Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-11-18 PCPPLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER VIRTUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 18, 2021 This VIRTUAL meeting is being conducted by electronic means in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.021. Public access to the Webex meeting is below: Online: logis.webex.com | Phone: (312) 535-8110 Meeting Number (Access Code): 2455 692 8416 Passcode: BCPC11182021 1.Call to Order – 7 p.m. 2.Roll Call 3.Approval of Agenda a.Motion to Approve Planning Commission Meeting Agenda for November 18, 2021 4.Approval of Minutes a.Motion to Approve Regular Meeting Minutes for September 9, 2021 b.Motion to Approve Regular Meeting Minutes for August 12, 2021 5.Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 6.Planning Items a. Planning Commission Application No. 2021-006 (PUBLIC HEARING) Applicant: McGlynn Partners LLC | ODAA Center LLC Project Location: 6440 James Circle North Summary: The Applicant is requesting review and consideration of a proposal to re-develop the former Earle Brown Bowl property, located at 6440 James Circle North, to an approximately 64,000-square foot mixed office and light industrial building with related site improvements on an approximately 4.03-acre site. The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides the Subject Property as “Business Mixed-Use.” 7.Discussion Items a.Upcoming Joint Planning and Housing Commissions Work Sessions (November 30th | December 14th) b.December 9th Planning Commission Meeting c.2022 Planning Commission Schedule 8.Adjournment PC Minutes 09-09-21 -1-DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 9, 2021 1.CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Koenig at 7:12 p.m. The meeting was conducted via Webex. 2.ROLL CALL C hair Alexander Koenig and Commissioners Paul Oman, Peter Omari, Alfreda Daniels - Juasemai, Stephanie Jones, and Paris Dunn. City Planner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh was also present. 3 .APPROVAL OF AGENDA – SEPTEMBER 9, 2021 There was a motion by Commissioner Jones , seconded by Commissioner Omari, to approve the agenda for the September 9, 2021, meeting as presented. V oting on the motion: Chair Koenig and Commissioners Omari, Jones, Daniels -Juasemai, and Dunn voted aye. The motion passed unanimously. 4.APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4a) Motion to Approve Regular Meeting Minutes for June 10, 2021 There was a motion by Commissioner Daniels -Juasemai, seconded by Commissioner Dunn, to approve the minutes of the June 10, 2021 meeting as presented. V oting on the motion: Chair Koenig and Commissioners Omari, Jones, Daniels -Juasemai and Dunn voted aye. The motion passed unanimously. 4b) Motion to Approve Regular Meeting Minutes for August 12, 2021 – Request to Move to Future Planning Commission Meeting C ommissioner Daniels -Juasemai stated she does not recall that there was actually a meeting in Augus t 2021. She added the meeting was closed because it was not available to the public. C ity Planner Ms. McIntosh stated she would follow up with the City Attorney. She added it was her understanding that it was agreed that there was no intention to violate the Open Meeting Law and the meeting was ended. PC Minutes 09-09-21 -2-DRAFT Chair Koenig stated he would support moving forward with receiving minutes for August 12, 2021, at a future Planning Commission meeting, since there was a meeting that was opened and closed and there was substantial discussion. C ommissioner Daniels -Juasemai stated she does not recall having a substantial discussion about any item. C hair Koenig stated the meeting was not called to order and then immediately adjourned. He added Ms. McIntosh has indicated she will determine the correct procedure. C ommissioner Daniels -Juasemai stated she is not expressing an opinion but rather requesting clarification regarding the meeting minutes. Commissioner Omari stated, for the record, the meeting did take place. He added the meeting was publicly opened and closed, and everything that transpired should be included in minutes for the public record. Chair Koenig agreed. There was a motion by Commissioner Daniels -Juasemai, seconded by Commissioner Omari, to move the August 12, 2021, Planning Commission meeting minutes to a future Planning Commission meeting to be determined. V oting on the motion: Chair Koenig and Commissioners Omari, Jones, Daniels -Juasemai and Dunn voted aye. The motion passed unanimously. 5 .CHAIR’S EXPLANATION C hair Koenig explained the Planning Commission’s role as an advisory body. One of the Commission’s functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 6 .PLANNING APPLICATION ITEMS 6 a) Planning Commission Application No. 2021 -003 (PUBLIC HEARING) Applicant: Evangelical Lutheran Church of the Master Property Address: 1107 Emerson Lane, 6907 Dupont Avenue North, 1100 69th Avenue North, and 1200 69th Avenue North Summary: The Applicant is requesting review of a proposal to re -plat approximately 6.69 acres of property located at the northwest corner of 69th Avenue North and Dupont Avenue North, which would allow for the sale of an existing seven- unit apartment building on approximately 0.47 acres. The request also requires approval of certain re -zoning, an amendment to the Planned United Development, and issuance of a Special Use Permit to allow for the continuation of certain church/ancillary uses. A PC Minutes 09-09-21 -3-DRAFT Comprehensive Plan amendment shall be requested to reflect the updated zoning and separation of the apartment building from its association with the adjacent church and future land use designation as an institutional use. Ms. McIntosh reviewed a proposal from the applicant, Lutheran Church of the Master (LCM) to replat 6.69 acres of property at the northwest corner of 69th Avenue and Dupont Avenue, to allow the applicant to sell a stand-alo ne 7-unit apartment building that they have owned for some time. This item is a review of approvals including rezoning, Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment, issuance of a Special Use Permit for continuation of ancillary uses, and a Comprehensive Plan amendment to reflect zoning and separation of the apartment building from its association with LCM. Ms. McIntosh stated the applicant acquired each of the apartment buildings on the site with the intention of phasing each building into the church campus. Recommended approvals are subject to execution of a development agreement between the City and the applicant. The applicant did not record a final plat with Hennepin County or meet the Special Use Permit requirements as outlined in the development agree ment, so the zoning reverted to R-4. Re -approvals are required to continue with current uses. Ms. McIntosh stated the applicant intends to sell the stand-alone 7-unit apartment building at 1100 69th Avenue, lot 2, but maintain the other two apartment buildings, which are connected by breezeway to the main church building. Minimum parking requirements would be met with current parking of 14 onsite parking spaces. The entrance to the apartment building would need to be brought up to ADA accessibility standards, as well as one ADA parking space and loading space, and a review of the fire system. Ms. McIntosh stated the PUD amendment and rezoning is required as the applicant wants the church and connected buildings to be rezoned back to PUD/R-1. The standalone apartment building does not need to be rezoned and will remain R-4. Ms. McIntosh stated a Special Use Permit is required as the site is operating as a church and religious use. Ms. McIntosh stated an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is required to redesignate the standalone apartment building site to medium density residential zoning. City Council approval and Met Council approval will be required. Ms. McIntosh stated notices for a public hearing were sent on June 10, 2021, after which the applicant withdrew the application due to additional questions. A new public hearing notice was sent on July 29, 2021, with additional flyers delivered on August 9, 2021 following the City’s emergency orders and the decision to change the mee ting to a remote meeting. The August 12, 2021 meeting was cancelled due to technical issues, and notices were sent again to 121 properties, as well as an extension to the application with a new deadline of November 10, 2021. City Staff received two phone calls from residents requesting information. PC Minutes 09-09-21 -4-DRAFT Ms. McIntosh stated City Staff recommends Planning Commission recommendation of City Council approval of Planning Application 2021-003 for rezoning, Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment, issuance of a Special Use Permit for continuation of ancillary uses, and a Comprehensive Plan amendment. C ommissioner Omari asked whether there is room for 14 parking spaces. Ms. McIntosh stated the replat was structured with the explicit purpose of ensuring 14 parking spaces. C hair Koenig asked, when the property is put up for sale, what type of use it will be sold as, or if the church will retain it. Ms. McIntosh stated the applicant intends to sell the south 7-unit apartment building, as it will be on its own lot, zoned R -4. C ommissioner Omari asked whether there will be sufficient parking for the tenants of the other 2 properties after the building is sold. Ms. McIntosh stated the other two buildings are connected to the church by breezeway and are not being used as apartment buildings, with the exception of approximately four apartments for church use. P arking for those two buildings will be in the main church parking lot. A proposed driveway easement off Dupont Avenue will be maintained as an access point. C ommissioner Dunn asked whether each apartment will be assigned parking spaces. Ms. McIntosh stated the 7-unit apartment building would be sold and would be no longer be under church ownership. The building’s new owner would be responsible for parking management. C ommissioner Daniels -Juasemai asked how many rooms are in each apartment, and whether families in the apartments will have enough parking. P astor Dan Haukos, LCM, stated there are four 2-bedroom apartments and three 1-bedroom apartments. He added the legal recommendation is two parking spaces per apartment. C ommissioner Daniels -Juasemai stated she understands the legal recommendation, but residents may have more than 2 cars. She asked if there is a back-up plan for additional parking. Ms. McIntosh stated the City’s Zoning Code has required two parking spaces per dwelling unit for many years. She added recent reviews of existing multi-family apartments in the City and their respective parking have shown that the City requires too much parking, rather than not enough. Oftentimes, the parking issues that arise are more out of the overall management or a desired access by residents. She noted this property will be sold to a private ownership, and parking will be the responsibility of the new owner. C ommissioner Daniels -Juasemai asked who will be purchasing the building. A church representative stated the building is not yet for sale. OPEN TO PUBLIC COMMENTS – APPLICATION NO. 2021-003 There was a motion by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Omari, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2021-003. PC Minutes 09-09-21 -5-DRAFT Voting on the motion: Chair Koenig and Commissioners Omari, Jones, Daniels -Juasemai and Dunn voted aye. The motion passed unanimously. There were no public comments. MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENTS (HEARING) There was a motion by Commissioner Daniels -Juasemai, seconded by Commissioner Jones , to close the public hearing on Application No. 2021-003. V oting on the motion: Chair Koenig and Commissioners Omari, Jones, Daniels -Juasemai and Dunn voted aye. The motion passed unanimously. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2021-002 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2021-003 The re was a motion by Commissioner Omari, seconded by Commissioner Jones , to approve Planning Commission RESOLUTION NO. 2021-002 recommending approval of Planning Application 2021-003 for rezoning, Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment, issua nce of a Special Use Permit for continuation of ancillary uses, and a recommended Comprehensive Plan amendment. V oting on the motion: Chair Koenig and Commissioners Omari, Jones, Daniels -Juasemai and Dunn voted aye. A nd the following voted against the sa me: None The motion passed unanimously. Ms. McIntosh stated this item will be on the September 27, 2021 City Council meeting agenda. C hair Koenig thanked the applicant for their patience and diligence. 6b) Planning Commission Application No. 2021-0 04 (PUBLIC HEARING) Applicant: Kyle Thompson of Hoyt Properties (on behalf of Fraser) Property Address: 6701 Parkway Circle Summary: The Applicant is requesting review and consideration of a request that would allow a children’s day treatment clinic within an approximately 8,248-square foot space. The Subject Property is zoned PUD -I1 (Planned Unit Development/Industrial Park) District and the amended and restated Planned Unit Development agreement on record requires that the Subject Property be limited only to permitted uses in the city’s I-1 zoning district. As medical clinics are not an outlined use within the underlying I-1 PC Minutes 09-09-21 -6-DRAFT District, the Applicant would require a special use determination per Section 35-330 of the City Code of Ordinances. Ms. McIntosh reviewed a request for issuance of Special Use Permit to operate a children's day clinic treatment center in an 8,200-square foot space currently zoned PUD I-1, Industrial Park Distric t, at 6701 Parkway Circle. Medical use is currently not a permitted use in this district, so the Special Use Permit is being requested for a medical clinic use. The PUD established approved off -site parking allocations as well as flexibility in developing industrial sites, which became more restrictive in 1995, and medical us es were not permitted for the Subject Property. However, a medical clinic under the same PUD exists at 6601 Shingle Creek Parkway and is an outlined permitted use . City Staff’s recommendation is to pursue the Special Use Permit for use determination for this particular use. Ms. McIntosh stated the proposal includes a sidewalk extension and bus zone as well as 40 proposed parking spaces in the common parking area, and spaces set aside for parents or guardians who might want to park and bring children in. The clinic would serve up to 48 children between the ages of 3-6 years who are in need of intensive mental health services, 7 hours a day from Monday through Friday, and employ up to 61 staff. No outdoor play area is proposed, and is not allowed on the property, but interior play areas are proposed. Ms. McIntosh stated proposed parking of 55 spaces has been deemed sufficient by City Staff. The requests and uses are in alignment with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A public hearing notice was submitted to the Sun Post on August 26, 2021, and notices sent to properties within the notification area. She noted she received one comment from a commercial property to the east expressing concern about pedestrian safety and suggesting restriping of a crosswalk. She forwarded a copy of the staff report and spoke to them on the phone. These concerns were relayed to the Applicant. Ms. McIntosh stated City Staff recommends Planning Commission recommendation of City Council approval of issuance of a Special Use Permit for operation of a children’s day treatment center at 6701 Parkway Circle, subject to the conditions of approval. C hair Koenig asked whether children will be brought by bus to the center, and how often they will come and go. The applicant stated transportation providers will children off between 8:45 – 9:15 a.m. He added there are generally 1-3 children per minivan, and they are escorted into the building by staff who go out to the van. He noted it is a very controlled environment and children are not left unattended. Drivers are not allowed to take children out of the vehicles. C hair Koenig stated he is familiar with Fraser and their organization, and this should end up to be a great project for the City. C hair Koenig asked what level of employees there will be, and whether there is the possibility for employment of local residents. The applicant stated there will be professionals associated with the site, and they often hire locally from within communities and colleges and provide behavioral therapist training. He added there are also educational opportunities for employees. PC Minutes 09-09-21 -7-DRAFT He noted this will be a good opportunity for people in the community as well as the children they serve. C ommissioner Omari asked how many parking spots will be available. Ms. McIntosh stated the applicant denotes 40 parking spaces in the common parking area and 10 reserved spaces for clients in the on-site parking lot. She added the minimum requirement for this type of use is 55 spaces, which assumes a more typical medical clinic. She noted the applicant has indicated there will be a maximum of 61 staff. K yle Thompson, Hoyt Properties, stated he is the leasing agent for the property associated with building ownership. He added his company acquired this building two years ago, along with 6601 Shingle Creek Parkway. He noted these types of properties are considered flexible, as they are designed industrial by nature but can be built out to 100% office or other uses. Many flex properties are used for medical clinics, and there are many located around the metro area. Mr. Thompson stated the amount of parking is sufficient for the property, with 118 stalls dedicated to Freeway Business Center 3, as well as a shared common lot across the street and additional stalls in the front and rear. Commissioner Omari stated he knows people who have received medical care from Fraser, and his wife volunteers at Fraser at the U of M. He added he respects what they do believes they will be a good addition to the community. The applicant stated they are excited to provide services in Brooklyn Center, and eager to move forward, as they are now a few months behind schedule. He added he appreciates the time and effort that City Staff have spent preparing this application, but they would love to move forward without much further delay. OPEN TO PUBLIC COMMENTS – APPLICATION NO. 2021-004 There was a motion by Commissioner Jones , seconded by Commissioner Omari, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2021-004. V oting on the motion: Chair Koenig and Commissioners Omari, Jones, Daniels -Juasemai, and Dunn voted aye. The motion passed unanimously. There were no public comments. MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENTS (HEARING) There was a motion by Commissioner Omari, s econded by Commissioner Daniels -Juasemai, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2021-004. V oting on the motion: Chair Koenig and Commissioners Omari, Jones, Daniels -Juasemai and Dunn voted aye. The motion passed unanimously. PC Minutes 09-09-21 -8-DRAFT ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2021-003 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2021-004. The re was a motion by Commissioner Jones , seconded by Commissioner Omari, to approve Planning Commission RESOLUTION NO. 2021-003 recommending Issuance of a Special Use Permit to Allow for a Children's Treatment Center and Medical Clinic at 6701 Parkway Circle subject to the Applicant and Property Owner Complying with Conditions of Approval. V oting on the motion: Chair Koenig and Commissioners Omari, Jones, Daniels -Juasemai, and Dunn voted aye. The motion passed unanimously. A nd the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. Ms. McIntosh stated this application will be reviewed at the September 27, 2021, City Council meeting. 6c) Planning Commission Application No. 2021-0 05 (PUBLIC HEARING) Applicant: Evangelical Lutheran Church of the Master Property Address: 1200 69th Avenue North Summary: The Applicant is requesting review and consideration of a proposal to replace an existing monument sign with a new Dynamic Messages Sign (DMS) at approximately the same location as an existing sign along the south portion of the Subject Property and fronting 69th Avenue North. Per Section 34.140.1.I, approval and issuance of a Special Use Permit is required. Ms. McIntosh reviewed a request to replace an existing free-standing sign with a new dynamic messaging sign (DMS) and electronic message board. The new DMS sign can be remotely controlled and display images and will be installed at the same location as the current sign. The City’s current Sign Code, which is currently being updated, includes requirements and standards for maximum brightness, sign area, allowances and minimum distancing from residential dwellings. The closest property to the sign location is the City’s pump house across the street, and the closest residential property is approximately 145 feet to the southeast, from the existing sign to the roofline of the home. Ms. McIntosh reviewed provisions under the existing Sign Code for one free-standing sign not to exceed 36 feet, not more than 10 feet above ground level, or one free-standing sign not to exceed 72 square feet and no more than 15 feet above ground level, with two or more street frontages. This property has more than one street frontage, so 72 square feet would be the maximum allowance. PC Minutes 09-09-21 -9-DRAFT Ms. McIntosh stated, under the Sign Code, a DMS sign must be free -standing, perpendicular to the adjacent roadway system, and the road must be a collector or arterial road as identified in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. This sign would be aligned perpendicular to 69th Avenue, which is identified as a collector street. DMS sign area is limited to 50% of the maximum allowable size of a free-standing sign, which would be 36 square feet, and the applicant is proposing 26 square feet. Ms. McIntosh stated the DMS sign must be located no less than 50 feet from any residential dwelling and must remain stationary or static for at least eight seconds or more. The sign’s fabricator has indicated that all requirements will be met, including ambient light requirements. The sign regulations can be controlled by City Code enforcement. Ms. McIntosh stated, with regard to Special Use Permit standards, there has been an illuminated sign at this location in some fashion for decades. The sign will be placed in the same location and should not be a detriment to the neighborhood. Ms. McIntosh stated the public hearing was noticed on August 26, 2021, and notifications sent to 82 properties in the notification area. No public comments were received prior to the meeting. Ms. McIntosh stated City Staff recommends Planning Commission recommendation of City Council approval of a request for a Special Use Permit for a DMS sign for the property at 1200 69th Avenue North, subject to conditions of approval. OPEN TO PUBLIC COMMENTS – APPLICATION NO. 2021-005 There was a motion by Commissioner Omari, seconded by Commissioner Jones , to open the public hearing on Application No. 2021-005. V oting on the motion: Chair Koenig and Commissioners Omari, Jones, Daniels -Juasemai, and Dunn voted aye. The motion passed unanimously. There were no comments. MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENTS (HEARING) There was a motion by Commissioner Omari, seconded by Commissioner Daniels -Juasemai, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2021-005. V oting on the motion: Chair Koenig and Commissioners Omari, Jones, Daniels -Juasemai and Dunn voted aye. The motion passed unanimously. C ommissioner Omari stated there is a sign on I -94 between Shingle Creek Parkway and Brooklyn Boulevard that flashes , and it is too bright. He added he feels that should be addressed. He noted a sign at the former Evergreen Elementary school has a large sign with tiny bulbs. He asked whether the proposed DMS sign would be similar to that. PC Minutes 09-09-21 -10 -DRAFT A representative from the sign company stated the sign will have small LED lights that are surface-mounted very close together. He added it is not a tv screen. He noted the sign will have 256 levels of automatic dimming, as well as dimming software. P astor Haukos stated the sign will be similar to the sign at Evergreen Elementary. C ommissioner Omari expressed concern about potential complaints from the residents at the nearby apartments, and whether the sign will be too bright. The sign company representative stated the sign will have a stationary message on a black background, and maybe the time and temperature. He added he does not believe it will cause any complaints. P a stor Haukos stated the sign will have ambient light sensitivity, so it will continue to dim itself automatically. Ms. McIntosh stated public use DMS signs are permitted under the current Sign Code via Special Use, but they must remain static for eight seconds, and the overall Sign Code prohibits any flashing, bouncing, or flares. There needs to be a seamless, on/off transition between messaging. Chair Omari agreed that is acceptable. Chair Koenig stated DMS signs look good, and he is satisfied with the ability to dim the sign’s illumination. C ommissioner Jones stated she likes DMS signs, and she has seen them for other businesses and employers, and it makes communication easier for the orga nization. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2021-004 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2021-005 The re was a motion by Commissioner Omari, seconded by Commissioner Daniels -Juasemai, to approve Planning Commission RESOLUTION NO. 2021-004 recommending Issuance of a Special Use Permit for a DMS sign for the property at 1200 69th Avenue N subject to conditions. V oting on the motion: Chair Koenig and Commissioners Omari, Jones, Daniels -Juasemai, and Dunn voted aye. A nd the following voted against the same: None T he motion passed unanimously. Ms. McIntosh this item will be on the agenda for the City Council’s September 27, 2021, meeting. PC Minutes 09-09-21 -11 -DRAFT 7 .DISCUSSION ITEM S a.Availability for Joint Planning and Housing Commission Work Sessions Ms. McIntosh stated she would like to determine the Commissioner’s availability so City Staff can schedule joint Planning Commission/Housing Commission work sessions. C ommissioner Omari requested brevity in the meetings. He added the same substance can be reviewed by spending less amount of time. Commissioner Daniels -Juasemai agreed. Ms. McIntosh stated the meeting will include a presentation by Bolton & Menk which typically last 2 hours, but she can inform them that efficiency is important. C hair Koenig stated the meetings could perhaps be reduced to 1.5 hours. Commissioner Omari agreed. The consensus of the Planning Commission was that Thursdays at 6:30 p.m. is preferred, and September 30, 2021, at 6:30 p.m. works for everyone. Ms. McIntosh stated she would need to confirm this with the Housing Commission. Ms. McIntosh stated another joint work session date could be October 14, 2021, which is a regularly scheduled Planning Commission me etin g. She added there may be one application for that night, and if it is a public hearing it could be substantial. b.October 14th Planning Commission Meeting Ms. McIntosh stated she will know by Tuesday whether there will be a public hearing at the Planning Commission’s October 14, 2021, meeting. 8.ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Daniels -Juasemai, seconded by Commissioner Omari, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. V oting on the motion: Chair Koenig and Commissioners Omari, Jones, Daniels -Juasemai, and Dunn voted aye. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:57 p.m. _______________________________ _______________________________ Ginny McIntosh, Secretary Alexander Koenig, Chair PC Minutes 08-12-21 -1-DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AUGUST 12, 2021 1.CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Koenig at 7:0 9 p.m. The meeting was conducted via Webex. 2.ROLL CALL C hair Alexander Koenig and Commissioners Peter Omari, Alfreda Daniels-Juasemai, Stephanie Jones, and Paris Dunn. City Pla nner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh, Community Development Director Meg Beekman, and Ass ociate Planner Olivia Boerschinger were also present. 3.APPROVAL OF AGENDA – AUGUST 12, 2021 There was a motion by Commissioner Omari, seconded by Commissioner Jones , to approve the agenda for the August 12, 2021, meeting as presented. V oting on the motion: Chair Koenig and Commissioners Omari, Jones, Daniels-Juasemai, and Dunn voted aye. The motion passed unanimously. 4.APPROVAL OF MINUTES -None. 5.CHAIR’S EXPLANATION C hair Omari explained the Planning Commission’s role as an advisory body. One of the Commission’s functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 6 .PLANNING APPLICATION ITEMS 6 a) Planning Commission Application No. 2021-0 03 (PUBLIC HEARING) Applicant: Evangelical Lutheran Church of the Master Property Address: 1107 Emerson Lane, 6907 Dupont Avenue North, 1100 69th Avenue North, and 1200 69th Avenue North Summary: The Applicant is requesting review of a proposal to re -plat approximately 6.69 acres of property located at the northwest corner of 69th Avenue North and Dupont Avenue PC Minutes 08-12-21 -2-DRAFT North, which would allow for the sale of an existing seven- unit apartment building on approximately 0.47 acres. The request also requires approval of certain re -zoning, an amendment to the Planned United Development, and issuance of a Special Use Permit to allow for the continuation of certain church/ancillary uses. A Comprehensive Plan amendment shall be requested to reflect the updated zoning and separation of the apartment building from its association with the adjacent church and future land use designation as an institutional use. Ms. McIntosh reviewed an application from Lutheran Church of the Master (LCM). She stated the applicant withdrew their application in June to allow more time to work through some items. Ms. McIntosh stated the applicant, Lutheran Church of the Master, intends to replat and sell the 7-unit apartment building at the corner of 69th Avenue and Dupont Avenue, which is currently combined with two other buildings on the site. She reviewed the requests related to this application: preliminary and final plat; Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment; Special Use Permit; rezoning; and Comprehensive Plan amendment. She noted approval of these requests would allow the applicant to sell the building as well as address conditions of approval that were not previously met. Ms. McIntosh stated the main church building was constructed in 1961, with a series of approvals over the years for additions and operations. She added, in 1994, a request was approved to rezone the property to R-1 and PUD -R1 to allow the church to expand into a campus over the years, conditioned upon satisfaction of certain requirements in the development agreement. Resident Randy Christensen stated the meeting is not available online. Chair Koenig stated he was able to access the link earlier, but that link is no longer available. He added the only link that works is in the email sent to the Planning Commission by Ms. McIntosh. He noted that is not available to the public. He asked whether the Open Meeting Law will be violated , as it is not a public meeting that anyone can join. Ms. McIntosh stated she is not able to amend the web meeting hyperlink due to permissions issues. She added mail notifications were sent to 100 properties with details for joining tonight’s Webex meeting and that it appeared the meeting number information identified in the City calendar event and mail notification was correct, but that the hyperlink displayed on the City website was re-directing to an earlier Planning Commission meeting. Ms. Beekman stated, since the Planning Commission does not have the benefit of the City Attorney’s opinion, and there are obviously technical difficulties, she would like to suggest that Ms. McIntosh continue with the presentation. She added the meeting was originally intended to be held in-person. She noted the Planning Commission can still make a recommenda tion, then PC Minutes 08-12-21 -3-DRAFT confer with the City Attorney, and potentially hold another public hearing at the City Council level. Commissioner Daniels -Juasemai stated she is uncomfortable with that, as the Planning Commission could be in direct odds with the Open Meeting Law. She added she would prefer to hear from the City Attorney before moving forward with this public hearing. Chair Koenig stated he concurs with Commissioner Daniels -Juasemai, but the Planning Commission could move forward with this item, separating the public hearing from the presentation, and making a decision at a later date. Ms. Beekman stated she is concerned about requirements for public hearings as it pertains to subdivision of property. She added State statute requires a public hearing, but it does not require that the public hearing must be held at the Planning Commission meeting. She noted the point about Open Meeting Law is a valid one. Resident Myrna Kauth stated it would be helpful to know how many people are connected to the meeting tha t are not on the Planning Commission. Ms. McIntosh stated there are five members of the public in attendance: Myrna Kauth, Randy Christensen, Andy Ristrom, Pastor Dan Haukos, and Patti Bauman. Randy Christensen stated holding the public hearing at a different meeting would require another meeting notice, and he is unsure whether the time frame would work. He added it is difficult to balance the Open Meeting Law even if the Planning Commission s till holds the meeting but moves the public hearing. Commissioner Daniels -Juasemai stated she is not comfortable discussing the issue but not voting on recommendations at this meeting. Commissioner Dunn stated this is a public hearing, but the public c annot hear or see this meeting. He asked how members of the public will be able to vote . Chair Koenig stated the public does not vote at Planning Commission meetings; however, their opinion is required and can be considered a vote of sorts. Commissioner Dunn agreed that the public should have an opportunity to voice their opinion. Commissioner Omari stated this is an issue that some of us were not aware of. He added it is a public meeting that the public is unable to access. He noted he is uncomfortable with holding a public meeting without being able to accommodate the church or neighborhood residents who may wish to speak. Commissioner Daniels -Juasemai stated she will remove herself from the meeting if any questions are asked about the project, to e nsure that there is no quorum. She asked what the next steps would be. PC Minutes 08-12-21 -4-DRAFT Ms. Beekman stated she spoke to the City Attorney via phone, who agreed that this is a gray area. She added his recommendation is to extend the application to 120 days. She noted this was clearly an unintentional error, as the meeting was planned to be held in person and was then changed to a virtual meeting following emergency orders declared. She noted this was an error of communication and on the website. Ms. Beekman stated the City Attorney recommended that this item be tabled to the Planning Commission’s next meeting to ensure that the public hearing is posted correctly and in compliance with State law. Commissioner Daniels -Juasemai stated, although this confusion is not intentional, she would not be comfortable with moving forward with the meeting, which is in violation of Open Meeting Law. Ms. Beekman stated this is the only item of note on the Agenda, and the entire meeting should be adjourned. Chair Koenig offer sincere apologies to the applicant for the technical difficulties. He added the application has already been delayed a few times. He asked whether the applicant had any comments or questions. Commissioner Daniels -Juasemai stated the meeting should be adjourned before any further comments are made. She added there is a quorum, and the Planning Commission is in violation of the Open Meeting Law. Commissioner Omari stated we realize this issue is due to technicalities beyond our control, and nothing has been discussed substantively. He added he supports moving ahead, taking comment and closing the meeting. Chair Koenig stated his intent in taking comments was to give the applicant an opportunity to get their voice on record, so that it does not appear as though the City did not allow them to give comments regarding adjournment. Pastor Dan Haukos stated he looks forward to hearing back from the City regarding this issue and moving forward with their request. 7.DISCUSSION ITEMS This Agenda Item was not discussed. 8 .ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Daniels -Juasemai, seconded by Commissioner Omari, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. PC Minutes 08-12-21 -5-DRAFT Voting on the motion: Chair Koenig and Commissioners Omari, Jones, Daniels-Juasemai, and Dunn voted aye. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 7:49 p.m. _______________________________ _______________________________ Ginny McIntosh, Secretary Alexander Koenig, Chair ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 1 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: November 18, 2021 Application No. 2021-006 Applicant | Property Owner: McGlynn Partners LLC | ODAA Center LLC Location: 6440 James Circle North Request: (1) Site and Building Plan, (2) Establishment of a Planned Unit Development, and (3) Rezoning I NTRODUCTION McGlynn Partners LLC (“the Applicant”) is requesting review and consideration of a proposal to re- develop the former Earle Brown Bowl property, located at 6440 James Circle North (“the Subject Property”), to an approximately 64,000-square foot mixed office and light industrial building with related site improvements on an approximately 4.03-acre site —refer to Exhibit A. The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides the Subject Property as “Business Mixed-Use.” T he Subject Property was formerly home to the AMF Earle Brown Lanes, which closed in 2015. The building and site subsequently sat vacant until 2017, when the property was purchased by Tashitaa Tufaa /ODAA Center LLC (“the Property Owner”). While the Property Owner successfully brought through a request for issuance of a Special Use Permit in 2018 to operate an event center with ancillary restaurant and bar, and requested a re -issuance of the permit in 2019 to allow additional time to initiate the project, the plans were never realized. Although the site and building plan request does not require a public hearing, the request for the establishment of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and re -zoning requires that a public hearing be scheduled. A public hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on November 4, 2021 (Exhibit B ). Mail notices were also sent out to those taxpayers and occupants with property falling within the designated notification area, and the City of Brooklyn Center Public Works installed two “Development Proposal Under Review” signs on the Subject Property and facing Freeway Boulevard and the west portion of James Circle North for additional visibility. 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING STANDARDS L and Use Plan: Business Mixed-Use (BM -U) Neighborhood: Shingle Creek Existing Zoning: C2 (Commerce) District Surrounding Zoning: North: I1 (Industrial Park) District East: C2 (Commerce) District South: C2 (Commerce) District West: C2 (Commerce) District •Application Filed: 10/19/2021 •Review Period (60-day) Deadline: 12/18/2021 •Extension Declared: N/A •Extended Review Period Deadline: N/A ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 2 Site Area: Approximately 4.03 acres Setback Standards: The proposal requests establishment of a Planned Unit Development (PUD), as well as a rezoning. As the Subject Property is located on a loop road (James Circle North), with one side fronting Freeway Boulevard, and two sides fronting James Circle North, this property would be considered a “triple frontage” lot. If viewing the Subject Property as having three frontages, the setbacks would be: Front Yard #1: 25 feet Front Yard #2: 62 feet Front Yard #3: 25 feet Side Interior Yard: 115 feet Although the Subject Property is zoned C2 (Commerce) District, the proposed use is light industrial in nature. With the current Zoning Code underway with a major update, City staff reviewed the proposal against the existing setback standards for the I1 (Industrial Park) District, which are: Front Yard: 50 feet Corner Side Yard: 50 feet Interior Side Yard: 10 feet Rear Yard : 25 feet B ased on the proposed setbacks, the Applicant will need to obtain flexibility from the existing Zoning Code with regard to minimum building setbacks. Additionally, no parking shall be permitted within 15 feet of the street right -of-way (ROW), and this area shall be maintained as a “green strip” under the City’s Zoning Code. This area is reflected on the submitted site plan (Sheet C-2.0) and the provided parking layout appears to meet the minimum green strip standards. Conformity to: 2040 Land Use Plan: Yes Zoning Ordinance: No—would require a re-zoning, but in line with 2040 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Designation Subdivision Ordinance : Existing —no alterations proposed (Tract F, Registered Land Survey #1482, Hennepin County, MN) Sign Ordinance: No requests under consideration at this time The Subject Property is currently zoned C2 (Commerce) District; however, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designates the property as, “Business Mixed-Use ”: Table 1. Business Mixed-Use (B -MU) Designation Description under 2040 Comprehensive Plan. ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 3 Map 1. 2040 Future Land Use Designations (Subject Property in Red). As noted in Map 1 above, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which was adopted in January 2020, identifies the Subject Property and surrounding area as a “potential area of change,” and the Business Mixed-Use land use designation, which is a new designation, is generally a flexible land use intended to accommodate manufacturing, warehouse, office, and other uses typically considered under the existing adjacent I1 Distr ict properties to the north, but also supporting retail and other commercial uses that would allow for a more dynamic business park area. BACKGROUND The existing approximately 35,462-square foot building was originally approved for and constructed in 1978 for use as the Earle Brown Bowl (bowling alley) under Planning Application Nos. 78023 and 78024 following site and building plan and Special Use Permit approvals by the City Council. The approval of Special Use Permit s under these applications allowed for live entertainment and a bowling alley in an area that was previously zoned I1 (Industrial Park) District . This allowed for the Subject Property to function as a bowling alley, restaurant, and game room/recreational facility. Map 2. 1975 City of Brooklyn Center Zoning Map—approximate location of Subject Property (Highlighted in Red). T he bowling alley and restaurant closed in April 2015 and sat vaca nt until 2017 when the current Property Owner purchased the property. The Property Owner subsequently brought through a request to renovate the bowling alley into an event center with ancillary restaurant and bar. City Council ultimately granted approval of the site and building plan and issued a Special Use Permit, which were contemplated under Planning Commission Application No. 2018-002 in 2018. ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 4 Special Use Permits require work to commence on the use within one (1) year of issuance of said permit, unless a request for extension is approved prior to expiration of the one year period. The Property Owner requested an extension under Planning Commission Application No. 2019-018; however , no work was undertaken or permits pulled to move the event center use forward and the Special Use Permit extension has since expired. It should be further noted that the building’s interior was substantially cleared out a couple years ago following water damage and the building is now effectively a shell. The Property Owner remained in contact with City staff and discussed potential redevelopment opportunities for the Subject Property as they came up. The Property Owner eventually partnered with Applicant Patrick McGlynn (McGlynn Partners LLC) and through their discussions determined that an industrial-type product might be better suited for the Subject Property. A concept review ultimately went before City Council on May 24, 2021 for the proposed approximately 64,000-square foot mixed office and light industrial building. Refer to Exhibit C for an excerpt of the meeting minutes. SITE AND BUILDING PLAN REVIEW Building The proposal c alls for the construction of a mixed office a nd light industrial building on the Subject Property located at 6440 James Circle North. T he Subject Property is a pproximately 4.03-acres in size and would be in close proximity to freeway access via Interstates 94 a nd 694, a s w ell a s T runk H ighways 252 and 100. A civil set, c ontaining site, ut ility, g rading a nd drainage, landscaping, a nd photometric plans, ha ve been provided by the Applicant a nd are a ttached as Exhibit A. Map 3 . Subject Property Location (Highlighted in Red). ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 5 As proposed, the existing former bowling alley building and site improvements would be razed to accommodate the new building. A demolition and removals plan was not provided as part of the submittal, but would need to be provided as part of any construction set submitted for any permit issuance. The west elevation fronting the Super 8 (6445 James Circle North) and Travelodge (6415 James Circle North) hotels would be designated office space, while the rear portion of the building, which backs along Jambo Africa (1601 Freeway Boulevard) and the Quality Inn (1600 James Circle North), would be designated industrial/warehouse space. The architectural set pr ovided outlines interior, floor, and exterior elevations and renderings of the new building, which would feature 28-foot clear heights and an overall 36-foot height, but does not provide a deta iled breakdown of the building material composition. It appears the majority of the building would be comprised of tip up walls (precast concrete) and glazing. I mage 1 . Proposed 694 Business Center—North and West Elevations (6440 James Circle North). I mage 2 . Proposed 694 Business Center—East Elevation (6440 James Circle North). The City does reference a set of design guidelines when reviewing site and building plan applications, and more so in cases where a Planned Unit Development (PUD) is to be established. These guidelines are based on the Shingle Creek Crossing Architectural Design Guidelines, which were approved in 2011. These guidelines strive to have at least 50-percent of all four sides (wall surfaces) of new buildings constructed with Class I mate rials, with the remaining surfaces to be constructed of Class II materi als. In certain cases, buildings may be allowed to have two of its elevation faces (typically front and back faces) with at least 50% of Class I and 50% Class II; with the remaining side faces of 25% Class I and 75% Class II materials. It should be noted that this location is highly visible from not only Freeway Boulevard and James Circle North, but also Interstate 694/94. ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 6 Class I materials include: brick or acceptable brick-type material, marble; granite; other natural stone or acceptable natural looking stone; textured cement stucco; copper; porcelain, glass; architectural textured concrete pre-cast panels; and other materials including masonry units with enhanced detailing such as patterns, textures, color, dimension, banding, and brick inlay, as approved by the City Planning Commission and City Council. Class II materials include: exposed aggregate concrete panels; burnished concrete block; integral colored split face (rock face) and exposed aggregate concrete block; cast-in-place concrete; artificial stuc co (e.g., E.I.F.S., Drivit); artificial stone; fiber-reinforced cement board siding with a minimum thickness of ¼ inch; canvas or vinyl awnings; prefinished metal; and other materials not listed elsewhere, as approved by the City Planning Commission and City Council. Following a review by City staff of the proposal, and in consideration of the request for establishment of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and the existing adjacent uses, City staff had requested that the following alterations be made to the plan set: •Push 4-sided architecture, with articulation and architectural consideration on all four sides; •Additional glazing, particularly focused around entrances and the building front ; •Additional/enhanced design elements around entrances: metal canopies, architectural ornamentation attached to exterior panels; •Fencing along rear (east) property line between loading area and adjacent properties – enhanced fencing materials such as cedar, or ornamental metal; and •Enlarged glazing along rear of property, in the upper area over the loading bays T he Applicant updated their architectural set; however, did not address a number of the above items. The Applicant had initially submitted their application for review at the October 2021 Planning Commission meeting, but as City staff was still waiting for the outstanding architectural revisions, along with signature pages, and the payment of the application fee/escrow, the application was determined t o be incomplete and a letter was sent to the Applicant, informing of this decision, on September 30, 2021. T he Applicant ultimately re-submitted their application but only addressed revisions to the north elevation of the proposed building in the revised architectural set. As part of any approval, City staff is requesting that the above items be included as conditions of approval, and particularly as the general area surrounding the Subject Property is designated under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan as “Business Mixed-Use” has been identified as an area of potential change. This area also has good visibility from adjacent roadways and Interstate 694/94, and pending any approval, would be the first major redevelopment in the area, with the exception of the FBI Regional Headquarters (2010). As the proposed building’s loading docks would face a restaurant (Jambo Africa) and hotel (Quality Inn), City staff is requesting that this area provide enhanced screening, as well as attention to detail in terms of offering additional glazing in the upper areas above the loading bays. Similarly, as the building will front multiple streets, City staff is requesting revisions to the materials and ornamentation (e.g. metal canopies) at the building corners. An example of this would be the recently approved Arbor Lakes Phase II project in Maple Grove, which provided a series of metal canopies and stonework to break up the overall flatness of the tip up panels. Endeavor Development , who has been working in conjunction with Applicant McGlynn Partners, LLC on this project is also involved with the Arbor Lakes Phase II project. ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 7 ACCESS AND PARKING Vehicular Access The site plan submitted identifies the addition of a new curb cut along the north end of the Subject Property and fronting Freeway Boulevard. Per City staff discussions, there was concensus that this curb cut should not be necessary given there are already two access points off Freeway Boulevard via James Avenue North. Both access points provide full access and allow quick access to I -694, 94, 100, and 252. City staff has, in general, taken an approach to minimizing additional curb cuts, both through consolidation and elimination. Given that there are already a number of curb cuts along this portion of Freeway Boulevard, the fact that neither end of James Avenue North is a controlled intersection, and discussions about the intensity of use, the proposed curb cut should not be necessary. Section 35-600 of the City’s Zoning Code also specifies that berth access “shall be located as to provide convenient access to a public street or alley in a manner that will least interfere with traffic.” With the removal of the curb cut off Freeway Boulevard, the Subject Property would still provide two access points off James Circle North for those utilizing the west parking lot, and a 30-foot wide curb cut would be maintained off James Circle North along the south portion of the site for both vehicular and truck traffic. Parking The proposed driveway aisles would meet the minimum two-way, 90-degree drive aisle requirement of 24-feet in width, and the proposed 90-degree parking spaces along the west and east portions of the Subject Property would meet the City’s minimum requirements as the site plan notes a typical width of nine (9) feet wide by 18 feet deep. I n reviewing the potential overall parking needs, and specifically, in reviewing parking for a speculative industrial development, City staff looked to other neighboring communities who have brought through similar type development —specifically, Brooklyn Park and Maple Grove. As part of the submittal, the Applicant offered the following assumptions with regard to use: Provided # of Stalls Square Feet of Use Minimum Parking Language Minimum Parking Provided # of Stalls Office (9.3%) ±6,000 SF Office buildings, exclusive of those specific uses otherwise listed (20,000 SF and under): Gross Floor Area ÷ 200 30 stalls 40 stalls Warehouse (90.6%) ±57,900 SF 1 space for every 2 employees based on max planned employment during any work period OR 1 space for each 800 square feet of Gross Floor Area — whichever requirement is greater. Assumption: 1 space for each 800 SF of GFA 73 stalls 73 stalls Total (100%) ±63,900 SF 103 stalls 117 stalls (noted) Table 2. Submitted Parking Requirement Breakdown (Refer to Section 35 -704). ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 8 As part of the conditions for any approval, City staff is requesting that a minimum 20-percent finish level be maintained at full lease up. Assuming a minimum of 20-percent office space and 80-percent industrial/warehouse, the following would need to be provided for under typical Code requirements: Provided # of Stalls Square Feet of Use Minimum Parking Language Minimum Parking Office (20 %) ±12,780 SF Office buildings, exclusive of those specific uses otherwise listed (20,000 SF and under): Gross Floor Area ÷ 200 64 stalls Warehouse (80 %) ±51,120 SF 1 space for every 2 employees based on max planned employment during any work period OR 1 space for each 800 square feet of Gross Floor Area —whichever requirement is greater. Assumption: 1 space for each 800 SF of GFA 64 stalls Total (100%) ±63,900 SF 128 stalls Table 3 . Parking Requirement Breakdown –Assuming 20-Percent Office Use | 80-Percent Warehouse (Refer to Section 35 -704). With the existing City Zoning Code currently underway with a major update and all sections under review, including parking, City staff is comfortable with the proposed 117 parking stalls, as outlined in the submitted site plan. Should it be determined that additional parking is required, the Applicant would need to revise the site plan set to allocate additional parking —likely along the east portion of the building, near the proposed loading berths. Loading Berths A series of loading berths are provided along the east portion of the Subject Property. The City’s Zoning Code requires a minimum of three (3) berths for those retail commerce, wholesale commerce, manufacturing, and warehousing uses with between 40,000 to 100,000-square feet of aggregate Gross Floor Area. These berths are to be located a minimum of 25 feet from the intersection of any two street right -of-way lines and no loading berths are to occupy any yard requirements bordering a street. As proposed, the plans meet this requirement. Section 35 -600 (Off-Street Loading) specifies that the first berth required not be less than 12 feet in width and 50 feet in length. Additional berths shall not be less than 12 feet in width and 25 feet in length. Per a review of the site plan, the depth requirement would be met. Although not indicated on the plan set, City staff is not concerned about the Applicant meeting the width requirement. LIGHTING | TRASH | SCREENING Lighting Per the City Zoning Code, “all exterior lighting shall be provided with lenses, reflectors, or shades, so as to concentrate illumination on the property of the owner or operator of said illumination devices.” Additionally, glare shall not emanate from or be visible beyond the boundaries of the illuminated premises. Section 35-712 (Lighting) of the City Zoning Ordinance further specifies that light ing shall not exceed ten (10) foot candles when measured at the property lines abutting the street right -of-way or ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 9 non-residentially zoned properties, or three (3) foot candles for residentially-zoned properties. T he Applicant furnished a photometric plan of the Subject Property (Sheet P-1.0), which indicates maximum foot candles on-site and along the property lines. Although the property is commercially- zoned, the Applicant should verify that the overall foot candle maximums along the Quality Inn (hotel) are three (3) foot candles or below at property line as the plans currently reflect maximums slightly above this range. This request is due to there being hotel rooms along the portion facing the proposed truck court/loading area. All lighting is proposed to be at a height of 30 feet. Per the City’s Architectural Guidelines, lighting should not exceed 28 feet at entry points and the Applicant should review opportunities for pedestrian level lighting at the requested sidewalk connection between Freeway Boulevard and the west parking area. Per the unofficial City architectural design guidelines, light poles, fixtures, and bases should maintain a consistent in color and feature dark sky-friendly or cutoff style fixtures. The Applicant should revise their plans to ensure all lighting that abuts the Quality Inn is concentrated towards the ground and provide shields if necessary to minimize light spray. The Applicant should also review opportunities to ensure lighting is concentrated along the west portion of James Avenue North, although City staff recognizes the importance of lighting for safety and security. As part of the building permit submittal, the Applicant will need to provide imagery of the proposed lighting , as well as fixture specifications. Trash The existing on-site trash enclosure, which is in poor condition, would be removed as part of any redevelopment. A new trash enclosure is proposed along the southeast end of the proposed building — near the loading berths. The civil plan set references the architectural set for details on the trash enclosure; however, City staff was unable to find any additional information. The Applicant will need to provide specifications as part of any approval and building permit submittal. As City staff is not aware of the overall trash and recycling needs for the proposed building and future tenants, an updated detail sheet would be requested at time of submittal for building permits. Image 3 . Proposed Trash Enclosure (East Elevation). Screening Trash enclosure s and any other ground mounted equipment (e.g., transformers, mechanical) shall be effectively screened from adjacent public rights-of-way and adjacent properties by a solid wall or opaque fence constructed of wood, masonry, or other durable materials that are complementary to the materials used on the primary building. Any r oof-mounted equipment shall also be screened from view ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 10 through use of parapets, wall/fencing materials, or paint to match surrounding colors when visible from the public right -of-way. As noted earlier in the report, City staff is requesting the Applicant revise their plan sets to account for fencing along the rear (east) property line, between the loading area and adjacent properties. The fencing material should be enhanced through use of a higher quality wood or ornamental metal. LANDSCAPING The project submittal includes a landscape plan, schedule, and details sheet. Although City Code does not have any specific requirements for landscape plantings, the City has operated under and held new and redeveloped areas to complying with the City’s adopted Landscape Point System policy, which assigns points to a given site based on the acreage of a development. The Point System requires light industrial type sites to provide a specific amount or number of landscaping units, and is based on a maximum percentage of certain materials (i.e., 50% shade trees; 40% coniferous trees; 35% decorate trees, and 25% shrubs). As the proposed mixed office/warehouse building would be located on approximately four (4) acres, the development would need to achieve a minimum of 270 points, assuming a development use category of “Light Industrial.” Planting Type Minimum Size Points Per Planting Maximum Points (%) Points Accrued Shade Trees 2 ½” diameter 10 50% or 135 points 135 points (MAX) (15 trees * 10 points) Coniferous Trees 5’ height 6 40% or 108 points 48 points (8 trees * 6 points) Decorative Trees 1” diameter 1.5 35% or 94.5 points 25.5 points (17 trees * 1.5 points) Shrubs 12” diameter 0.5 25% or 67.5 points 77.5 points (155 shrubs * 0.5 points) Total 100% = 270 points (minimum) 286 points accrued Table 4. Landscape Point System Policy Breakdown for Subject Property. The Applicant provided a landscape plan (Sheet L -1.0) t hat depicts the planting of deciduous, ornamental (decorative), evergreen and flowering shrubs; As summarized in Table 4 above, the Applicant will need to accrue the minimum number of points and factor for a diversity of planting types to meet the City’s Landscape Point System Policy requirements. Based on a review of the planting schedule, the Applicant would meet and exceed the minimum requirements under this policy. As an added note, the Applicant intends to provide plantings that are greater than the minimum sizing/caliper required. This would assist in “establishing” the site more quickly. The Applicant should reference the City’s unofficial Architectural Design Guide lines regarding overall landscaping and site treatment. As part of any approval, the Subject Property will require an irrigation system to be installed and a plan to be submitted to the City. CITY ENGINEER REVIEW Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg conducted a review of the application submittal and documents. Comments regarding this application can be found in the memorandum to city staff dated November 10, 2021, and attached hereto (Exhibit D ). It should be noted that some of the outlined conditions may be ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 11 applicable at time of approval for future land disturbance (alteration) or building permits. T he entirety of the site (4.03 acres) would be disturbed as part of the proposal and all existing improvements on site (e.g. former Earle Brown Bowl, trash enclosure, parking areas) would be demolished and removed. A demolition and removals plan would be required as part of any approvals. As the total disturbed area is greater than one (1) acre, an NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permit will be required. T he submitted grading and erosion control plan (Sheet C-3.0) indicates a proposed stormwater pond and the southwest corner of the Subject Property. A stormwater narrative was submitted to City staff as part of the application submittal. Per City staff comments, easements should be identified on the submitted utility plan, and a Utility Facilities Easement Agreement is required. The Applicant will also need to complete a Construction Management Plan and Agreement. T he installation or revision of all utility services and lines, and the finished grading of the Subject Property are to be reviewed and conducted under issuance of a separate Land Disturbance (Alteration) permit, which is reviewed and approved by City engineers, and inspected for completeness by the City Engineering and Building Official staff. T he Applicant will also need to address requests to align the northwest entrance to match the centerline of the entrance on the west side of James Circle North, remove the proposed new north curb cut along Freeway Boulevard, and provide a detailed vehicle turning and tracking movement diagram for delivery and semi-truck vehicles, garbage trucks, etc. Unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer, the perimeters of all driving and parking areas shall be bounded by type B6-12 curb and gutter. BUILDING OFFICIAL REVIEW Building Official Dan Grinsteinner conducted a review of the application submittal and documents and an on-site r eview of the site and building and provided his initial comments in a memorandum dated November 12, 2021 (Exhibit E). The Applicant will need to apply for a SAC (Sewer Access Charge) determination from the Metropolitan Council. This determination and any charges will be due upon issuance of any building permit. The building will also require installation of a fire sprinkler system, and fire access shall be provided. As this is not an all-encompassing list of requirements or a review of construction plan sets, the Applicant shall work wit h the Fire Inspector and Building Official to ensure all aspects of the site meet Fire Code and Building Code requirements. SIGNAGE Although wall signage is identified in the submitted architectural renderings, no formal requests for approval were made as part of the application submittal. Any new signage, including wall and monument signs, would require conformance with City Code requirements. Any requests beyond t he allowances identified under the City’s sign provisions would require that the Applicant apply for and receive approval to deviate from the outlined requirements. The Applicant will need to file a separate application with the City for any proposed signage. B ased on staff findings, staff recommends Planning Commission recommendation of the requested site and building plans for the Subject Property, located at 6440 James Circle North; subject to the ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 12 Applicant receiving approval of a rezoning and establishment for a Planned Unit Development at the Subject Property and complying with all conditions of approval. REZONING AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Section 35-355 (Planned Unit Development) of the City’s Zoning Code notes that upon the rezoning for a PUD, the district shall be designated by the letters “PUD” followed by the alphanumeric designation of the underlying zoning district, which may be either the prior zoning classification or a new classification. Given that the major update to the City Zoning Code is currently underway and changes to districts are anticipated in order to align with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the request would be to re-zone following guidance from the 2040 Comprehensive Plan future land use designations for the Subject Property. This allows for flexibility within the Zoning Code for developments which would not be allowed under the existing regulations. PUDs are often used to achieve a higher quality development, or achieve other City goals, in exchange for zoning flexibility from the City Code. PUDs may only contain uses consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the uniqueness of each PUD requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities, public facilities, and the approval of a land subdivision may be subject to modifications from the City ordinances generally governing them— essentially the City Council may approve plans that are not in compliance with the usual specifications or ordinance requirements where it is found that such are not required in the interests of residents or the City, although plans shall comply with all watershed, state, and federal storm water, erosion control, and wetlands requirements. In this particular case, the Applicant would be requesting flexibility from the City’s existing Zoning Code to allow for lesser building setbacks—and specifically, the north and south front yard setbacks (approximately 25 feet each from property line). As approval of any development plan for the Subject Property shall constitute a re-zoning to PUD, approvals to establish a PUD require the City Council to base its actions on the re-zoning under the following criteria: 1.Compatibility of the plan with the standards, purposes, and intent of this se ction (Section 35- 355); 2.Consistency of the plan with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; 3.The impact of the plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located; and 4.The adequacy of internal site organization, uses, densities, circulation, parking facilities, public facilities, recreational areas, open spaces, and buffering and landscaping. With regard to the intended rezoning, Section 35-208 (Rezoning Evaluation Policy and Review Guidelines), outline that it is the City’s policy that: a.Zoning classifications must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; a nd b.Rezoning proposals shall not constitute “spot zoning,” defined as a zoning decision which discriminates in favor of a particular landowner, and does not relate to the Comprehensive Pla n or to accepted planning principles. Furthermore, requests for rezonings should be assessed against a series of guidelines outlined under the City’s Zoning Code: a.I s there a clear and public need or benefit? ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 13 b.Is the proposed zoning consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use classifications? c.Can all permitted uses in the proposed zoning district be contemplated for development of the Subject Property? d.Have there been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area since the Subject Property was zoned? e.In the case of City-initiated rezoning proposals, is there a broad public purpose evident? f.Will the Subject Property bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed z oning districts? g.Is the Subject Prope rty generally unsuited for uses permitted in the present zoning district, wit h respect to size, configuration, topography, or location? h.Will the rezoning result in the expansion of a zoning district, warranted by: 1.Comprehensive Planning; 2.The lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district; or 3.The best interests of the community? i.Does the proposal demonstrate merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of a n individual parcel? As proposed, the request would be to re-zone the Subject Property from C2 (Commerce) District to Planned Unit Development/Business Mixed-Use (PUD/B -MU). The Subject Property has been zoned C2 since the late 1970s. Prior to this, the area encompassing the Subject Property was zoned I1 (Industrial Park) District. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides the Subject Property under a future land use designation of “Business Mixed-Use,” which, as noted earlier in the report, is a new designation. T his future land use designation is generally a flexible land use intended to accommodate manufacturing, warehouse, office, and other uses typically considered under the existing adjacent I1 District properties to the north, but also supporting retail and other commercial uses that would allow for a more dynamic business park area. Residential uses, with the exception of some limited live-work opportunities, are not permitted under this land use designation. As has been noted earlier in the report, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies this property, as well as the immediate surrounding area, as an area of likely proposed changes to the uses that exist today, and City staff has long viewed this area as an area waiting to transition. The entire area located north of Freeway Boulevard is currently zoned I1 District and shares a future land use designation of “Business Mixed-Use” under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. While there has been some redevelopment and construction of newer style industrial/office buildings in the south portion of Brooklyn Center (e.g. Caribou Headquarters), the majority of industrial buildings located in proximity to the Subject Property are of 1960s to 1980s vintage and often do not possess the clear heights desired in today’s industrial market. On November 8, 2021, Julie Kimble of KimbleCo presented her findings to City Council following a review of market demand and regional market trends affecting Brooklyn Center. Her overview noted that a typical clear height for distribution product types is oft en greater than 28 feet in height, whereas office/warehouse products are typically 24 feet in height or more. The c lear heights for flex, research and development, and office showrooms range between 14 and 20 feet—this is what is more often seen in the Cit y’s I1 District. Although this space is still valuable, the City more often sees these spaces remaining vacant for longer periods of time. The City also fields contacts with a number of interested parties seeking non-typical industrial uses in these areas (e.g. autism centers, medical clinics, churches, ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 14 non-profits). These uses are often at odds with industrial spaces given the parking needs and requirements to retrofit buildings for their usage (e.g. additional fireproofing, panic hardware, inadequate parking). As proposed, the clear height of the approximately 64,000-square foot building would be 28-feet, with an overall height of 36-feet. Although the clear height borders on the minimum clear heights necessary for a distribution facilities, City staff is requesting that as a condition of approval distribution fac ilities not be permitted except in cases where there is a manufacturing facility or a warehouse where a product is made or packaged on-site . In those situations, the distribution facility could only be accessory in nature. Pending approval, City staff is also requesting a minimum 20 -percent finish level be maintained upon full lease -up. These requests are intended to address City staff concerns regarding overall truck traffic generation and the transition and overall impact of this use on the adjacent properties. I ndustrial space is generally in high demand with a current market demand of 15-million square feet and a vacancy across the Twin Cities of 4.2-percent. The City often receives inquiries for industrial space that the City cannot accommodate—this is both due to the fact that the stock available in the adjacent I1 District is majority-wise of lower clear heights (under 20 feet), and the fact that the City is fairly built out. In reviewing recent approvals for industrial products in Brooklyn Park and Maple Grove, both Cities have received applications for and approved numerous speculative industrial developments. G iven the location of the Subject Property, it is understandable why this location would be of interest to an industrial user as these types of uses depend on access to freeway infrastructure. Although the Subject Property is in proximity to a number of hotels, the majority of the City’s hotels are actually in proximity to industrial users and in some cases are actually zoned I1 District. The nearest residential neighborhood is located to the east —across the on/off ramps for Highway 100. The nearest multi-family residential property (Pines Apartments—located at 6511 Humboldt Avenue North) is located to the northeast, across Freeway Boulevard and behind Winner Gas Station (6501 Humboldt Avenue North). Although the entirety of the James Circle North loop is currently zoned C2 (Commerce) District, the last development in this area was the FBI Regional Headquarters (2010). The City’s EDA had previously acquired the property prior to its redevelopment and the City’s EDA also owns 1601 James Circle North, which was formerly the site of a Cracker Barrel and Olive Garden restaurant. The remaining properties within this loop are three hotels (two constructed in 1980 and one in 1995), CES Imaging and print shop (constructed in 1996), and two restaurants (constructed in 1989 and 1996). Assuming the Applicant can meet the outlined conditions of approvals, of which address usage and requests to provide enhanced architectural design and site elements to minimize impacts to adjacent permitted uses, City staff believes the proposed redevelopment could successfully bring the Subject Property back online at a higher use that will provide new business and jobs in the City. B ased on staff findings, staff recommends Planning Commission recommendation of the requested establishment of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and rezoning of the Subject Property, located at 6440 James Circle North from C2 (Commerce) District to PUD/BM-U (Planned Unit Development/Business Mixed-Use); subject to the Applicant receiving approval of the aforementioned site and building plan and complying with all conditions of approval. ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 15 APPROVAL CONDITIONS: Staff recommends the following conditions be attached to any positive recommendation on the approval of Application No. 2021-006 for 6440 James Circle North (Subject Property): 1.T he building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits; and the final location or placement of any fire hydrants or other fire -related building code items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Inspector. a.Any major changes or modifications made to this Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to the approved Site and Building Plan as approved by the Cit y Council. Per City staff comment, the following shall be revised: i.Update the submitted civil set to remove the proposed new curb cut along Freeway Boulevard; ii.Provide and maintain sidewalk access from Freeway Boulevard and identify opportunities to provide pedestrian level lighting along this connection; iii.Provide space for installation of a bike rack/bike facilities given Subject Property proximity to the Shingle Creek Regional Trail as well as bus stops located just off-site along Freeway Boulevard; iv.Provide clear, internal crosswalk connections for those parking spaces indicated a long the east portion of the Subject Property; v.Provide four -sided architecture, with articulation and architectural consideration on all four sides and in consideration of the City’s Architectural Design Guidelines; vi.Provide a dditional glazing, and enhanced design elements, particularly focused a round entrances and the building front , including, but not limited to: metal canopies, architectural ornamentation attached to exterior panels; vii.Provide enlarged glazing along rear of property, in the upper area over the loading bays; a nd viii.Install fencing along rear (east) property line between loading area and adjacent properties using enhanced materials such as cedar, ornamental metal, or other product as approved by the City. b. Compliance with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer’s Review memorandum and redlined plan set da ted November 10, 2021. c.Compliance with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Building Official’s Building Review dated November 12, 2021. d.The Applicant shall verify that the proposed building and site has met all City Code requirements and specifications. e.A pre-constr uction conference shall be held with City staff and other entities designate d by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. 2.D istribution facilities are not a permitted use. For the purposes of this Planned Unit Development (PUD), a distribution facility is defined as a business that receives packages, sorts, and delivers them without product storage. Distribution as an accessory use is permitted only when it occurs from a manufacturing facility or a warehouse where a product is made or packaged on-site. 3.No outdoor storage or display of materials, equipment, or products accessory and necessary to ________________ App. No. 2021-006 PC 11/18/2021 Page 16 a principal and permitted use is permitted. 4.T he Applicant shall enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center. This agreement is to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. The agreement shall further assure compliance with the development plans submitted with this application. 5.The Property Owner/Developer shall execute a separate Performance Agreement with supporting financial guarantee approved by the City, which ensures the Subject Property will be constructed, developed, and maintained in conformance with the plans, specifications, a nd st a ndards comprehended under this site and building plan. 6.Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view per City Code requirements and with materials complementary to the principal building, and an updated details sheet provided. 7.Provide a revised photometric plan that reduces the maximum foot candles along the east portion of the property to three (3) foot candles or be low, and furnish fixture specifications a nd imagery of proposed light installations as part of the Building Permit submittal. 8.An irrigation system shall be installed on-site and irrigation shop drawings shall be provided to the City for review and approval prior to installation. 9.A sign permit application shall be submitted for any proposed signage as part of the development proposal. Signage is subject to the provisions of the City Code. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above -noted findings, Planning Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommends City Council approval of the requested site and building plan, rezoning, and establishment of a Planned Unit Development for the Subject Property located at 6440 James Circle North, and as contemplated under Planning Commission Application No. 2021-006, subject to the Applicant complying with the outlined conditions of approval. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A – Submitted Application Narrative, Documents, and Plans for 6440 James Circle North, prepared by McGlynn Partners, LLC, Mohagen Hansen, and Alliant Engineering, Inc. Exhibit B – Published Notice for 6440 James Circle North, published on November 4, 2021 in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post. Exhibit C – Select City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes, dated May 24, 2021. Exhibit D – Review Memorandum, prepared by Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg, dated November 10, 2021. Exhibit E – Review Memorandum, prepared by Building Official Dan Grinsteinner, dated November 12, 2021. Brooklyn Center Industrial Submitted By: McGlynn Partners LLC. September 14, 2021 Introduction The development site is a 4.03 acre parcel located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Freeway Boulevard and James Circle North. We are proposing to construct a mixed office and light industrial building which will cover approximately 63,780 square feet. The site is bounded on the north by Freeway Boulevard, on the west and south by James Circle North, and on the east by two commercial parcels. Comprehensive Guide Plan Designation The site is currently a Commercial Land Use but is guided for Business Mixed-Use (B-MU) in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Per the 2040 Plan, B-MU is a new designation which guides land for a mixture of uses including commercial, office, general business and light industrial uses. No Land Use designation change is requested. Zoning Classification The property has a current zoned as Commerce (C2). A zoning change to Industrial Park (I1) is requested. Surrounding Sites & History: The site’s previous use was as a bowling alley, Earle Brown Lanes, originally constructed in 1978 and closed in the summer of 2015. While the site was considered for redevelopment as an event center and granted a permit in 2017 and again in 2020, the site has ultimately remained vacant since 2015. Surrounding Property Designations: Land Use (Per 2040 Comprehensive Plan) The site is surrounded on all sides by land guided Business Mixed-Use (B-MU). Zoning The site is surrounded by two uses, Industrial Park (I1) and Commerce (C2) North – Freeway Boulevard and Industrial Park (I1) East – Commerce (C2) South – James Circle Road and Commerce (C2) West – James Circle Road and Commercial (C2) Exhibit A Stormwater & Utilities The site is located in the Brooklyn Center Regional Treatment credit area, thus the project will provide treatment for the 1.1 inch “first flush” rainfall event on-site. We are required to have a reduction in stormwater rates. Additionally, stormwater must be treated prior to discharge to remove 60 percent of phosphorus and 85 percent of total suspended solids. Treatment may be provided by one or more permanent sedimentation and water quality ponds or a combination of BMPs that together will meet removal requirements. We anticipate the on-site stormwater will be treated via a pond in the southwest portion of the site. The site is currently served by existing utilities on the north side of the site. Existing utilities will be reused to the greatest extent possible. Traffic The site has two primary parking areas. The west lot will serve office users and has two access points on to James Circle North, one to the north west and one to the south. The east lot provides access to truck docks and has two access points as well. The north access from Freeway Boulevard is intended for entry only and will be signed and enforced with a “Do Not Enter” sign facing toward the lot. The second truck access, to the south of the east lot, is to James Circle North. Conclusion McGlynn Partners LLC seeks to revitalize a vacant underutilized site with good highway access, but which has remained vacant since 2015. The project is environmentally conscious in redeveloping a parcel currently served by existing utilities and roadway infrastructure. The proposed office and light industrial building is in keeping with the City’s vision for the area, as articulated in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and with a diversity of users will contribute to the vitality of the area. SITE LOCATION AREA MAP BUILDING IMAGE 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Drive Suite 200, Wayzata, MN 55391 T: 952-426-7400 F: 952-426-7440PROJECTCLIENTPROJECT ADDRESSDATEPROJECT PHASEPROJ. NO.MohagenHansen.com MCGLYNN / 21136 / CITY SUBMITTAL / 694 Business Center694 Business Center 9-30-2021 21136 CITY SUBMITTAL BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 NEW CONSTRUCTIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCERTIFICATION 18074 TODD MOHAGEN, AIA, NCARB I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. REGISTRATION NUMBER: SHEET INDEX SHEET # SHEET DESCRIPTION CITY SUBMITTAL: 09-14-2021CITY SUBMITTAL UPDATE: 09-30-2021GENERAL A000 SHEET COVER ●● ARCHITECTURAL A100 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN ●● A201 FLOOR PLAN ●● A300 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS ●● A301 ENLARGED ENTRY ELEVATION ●● A302A RENDERING - NORTH WEST ENTRY ●● A302B RENDERING - WEST ENTRY ●● A302C RENDERING - SOUTH WEST ENTRY ●● A302D RENDERING - NORTH WEST AERIAL ●● A310 BUILDING SECTIONS ●● I ACCEPT AND APPROVE THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS DRAWING SET AS A REPRESENTATION OF OUR DESIGN INTENT. SHOULD OWNER INITIATE CHANGES THAT RESULT IN REVISIONS AND/OR MODIFICATIONS ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICE FEES WILL BE CHARGED. CLIENT APPROVAL TITLE: AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF: PROPOSED BUILDING: 63,800 GSF DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DRAWING INFORMATIONPHASEISSUE RECORDREGISTRATIONARCHITECTPROJECT NAMECOMPUTER DIRECTORY:SHEET DESCRIPTIONTHE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION18074 TODD MOHAGEN, AIA, NCARB I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. REGISTRATION NUMBER:CITY STAMPC:\Revit Projects\21136_694BusinessCenter_Master_jjohnson@mohagenhansen.com.rvtA100 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN B.HUNKE/ T.MOHAGEN J.JOHNSON 9-30-2021 21136 694_BusinessCenter\21136_ShellAndCore CITY SUBMITTAL 694 Business Center NEW CONSTRUCTION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1" = 20'-0"A100 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN N NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CITY SUBMITTAL 09-14-2021 UP A3002 A300 A300 A300 4 1 A A B B C C D D E E F F G G H H J J K K 11 22 33 44 30'-0"15'-0"45'-0"60'-0"50'-0"50'-0"50'-0"50'-0"50'-0"50'-0"30'-0"20'-0"50'-0"50'-0" 3 MECH 113 WAREHOUSE 100 S6 2 1 A310 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 A310 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EQ EQ 1 A700 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ A800 28 A800 29 450'-0"150'-0"45'-0"45'-0"60'-0"S62 S62 32'-0"24'-8 3/8" 10'-4" 3'-4"150'-0"30'-0"9'-0"111'-0"16'-0" 12'-0" 11'-0" 9'-0" 18'-4" 3'-4" 17'-4" 9'-0"32'-0"9'-0" 17'-4" 3'-4" 15'-4" 9'-0"31'-0"9'-0" 22'-4" 3'-4"4'-8"3'-4" 18'-4" 9'-0"30'-0"9'-0" 18'-4" 3'-4" 20'-4" 9'-0" 18'-0" 9'-0" 22'-0" 12'-0" 2'-4"3'-4" 10'-4"9'-0" 16'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0"85'-0"24'-0"8'-0"12'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"26'-4"3'-4"2'-4"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"24'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"2'-4"3'-4"2'-4"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"22'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"2'-4"3'-4"2'-4"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"24'-0" 1.61.6 C.4 C.4 N DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DRAWING INFORMATIONPHASEISSUE RECORDREGISTRATIONARCHITECTPROJECT NAMECOMPUTER DIRECTORY:SHEET DESCRIPTIONTHE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION18074 TODD MOHAGEN, AIA, NCARB I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. REGISTRATION NUMBER:CITY STAMPC:\Revit Projects\21136_694BusinessCenter_Master_jjohnson@mohagenhansen.com.rvtA201 FLOOR PLAN B.HUNKE/ T.MOHAGEN J.JOHNSON 9-30-2021 21136 694_BusinessCenter\21136_ShellAndCore CITY SUBMITTAL 694 Business Center NEW CONSTRUCTION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1/16" = 1'-0"A201 1 FLOOR PLAN NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CITY SUBMITTAL 09-14-2021 PCP-1 INSULATED PRE-CAST PANEL - STEEL FORM FINISH PRECAST PANEL - PAINTED COLOR: LIGHT TAN EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND MTL-1 PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING AND TRIM - FIRESTONE UNICLAD COLOR: BONE WHITE P-1 COLOR: TO MATCH PAINT PCP-1 PAINT COLOR PCP-2 INSULATED PRE-CAST PANEL - STEEL FORM FINISH PRECAST PANEL - PAINTED COLOR: DARK BRONZE PCP-3 INSULATED PRE-CAST PANEL - STEEL FORM FINISH PRECAST PANEL - PAINTED COLOR: MEDIUM GRAY NOTES: 1. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT MULLION/ FRAME: CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM 2. OVERHEAD DOCK DOOR: PRE-FINISHED WHITE 3. OVERHEAD DOCK BUMPERS: PRE-FINISHED WHITE 4. GLAZING: CLEAR LOW-E 5. HM DOORS: P-1 6. METAL SUNSHADE: SUNSHADE CANTILEVERED TYPE AS MANUFACTURED BY INDUSTRIAL LOUVERS - ST SERIES W/ 2"X24" RECTANGULAR FASCIA AND OUTRIGGERS. 2"X24" FASCIA ATTACHED TO PRECAST PANEL W/ MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD BRACKET CONNECTION. SEPARATOR SHEET, SLIP SHEET OR APPLIED COATING TO ENSURE NO REACTION BETWEEN STEEL, ALUMINUM AND OTHER DISSIMILAR MATERIALS. FINISH OF ALL COMPONENTS TO BE PRE-FINISHED WHITE. 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" B.O. DECK-LOW - SEE STRUCT. 130' - 5 1/2" T.O. PANEL-A 133' - 0" T.O. PANEL-B 136' - 0" A B C D E F G H J K B.O. DECK-HIGH - SEE STRUCT. 132' - 3" B.O. SUN SHADE 112' - 0" PCP-1 MTL-1 PCP-2 INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL A301 2 A301 3 A301 2 CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL PCP-3 REV WALL PACK WALL PACK WALL PACK WALL PACK WALL PACK C.4 30'-0"11'-3"1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" B.O. DECK-LOW - SEE STRUCT. 130' - 5 1/2" T.O. PANEL-A 133' - 0" DOCK LEVEL 96' - 0" T.O. PANEL-B 136' - 0" 1 2 3 4 B.O. DECK-HIGH - SEE STRUCT. 132' - 3" B.O. SUN SHADE 112' - 0" PCP-1 MTL-1 PCP-2 WALL PACK CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" WALL PACK 1.6 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" B.O. DECK-LOW - SEE STRUCT. 130' - 5 1/2" T.O. PANEL-A 133' - 0" DOCK LEVEL 96' - 0" T.O. PANEL-B 136' - 0" 1234 B.O. DECK-HIGH - SEE STRUCT. 132' - 3" B.O. SUN SHADE 112' - 0" PCP-2 MTL-1 WALL PACK CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" WALL PACK WALL PACK 1.6 PCP-3 INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL PCP-1 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" B.O. DECK-LOW - SEE STRUCT. 130' - 5 1/2" T.O. PANEL-A 133' - 0" DOCK LEVEL 96' - 0" T.O. PANEL-B 136' - 0" ABCDEFGHJK B.O. DECK-HIGH - SEE STRUCT. 132' - 3" PCP-1 MTL-1 PCP-2 WALL PACK CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" WALL PACK WALL PACKWALL PACKWALL PACKWALL PACK C.4 N DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DRAWING INFORMATIONPHASEISSUE RECORDREGISTRATIONARCHITECTPROJECT NAMECOMPUTER DIRECTORY:SHEET DESCRIPTIONTHE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION18074 TODD MOHAGEN, AIA, NCARB I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. REGISTRATION NUMBER:CITY STAMPC:\Revit Projects\21136_694BusinessCenter_Master_jjohnson@mohagenhansen.com.rvtA300 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS B.HUNKE/ T.MOHAGEN J.JOHNSON 9-30-2021 21136 694_BusinessCenter\21136_ShellAndCore CITY SUBMITTAL 694 Business Center NEW CONSTRUCTION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1/16" = 1'-0"A300 1 ELEVATION - WEST 1/16" = 1'-0"A300 2 ELEVATION - SOUTH 1/16" = 1'-0"A300 4 ELEVATION - NORTH 1/16" = 1'-0"A300 3 ELEVATION - EAST NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CITY SUBMITTAL 09-14-2021 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O. PANEL-A 133' - 0" T.O. PANEL-B 136' - 0" A B T.O. SUN SHADE 114' - 0" B.O. SUN SHADE 112' - 0" BACKLIT SIGNAGE INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL METAL SUNSHADE INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL PCP-1 MTL-1 CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" PCP-2 PCP-2 MTL-1 PCP-3 PCP-1 PCP-1 INSULATED PRE-CAST PANEL - STEEL FORM FINISH PRECAST PANEL - PAINTED COLOR: LIGHT TAN EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND MTL-1 PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING AND TRIM - FIRESTONE UNICLAD COLOR: BONE WHITE P-1 COLOR: TO MATCH PAINT PCP-1 PAINT COLOR PCP-2 INSULATED PRE-CAST PANEL - STEEL FORM FINISH PRECAST PANEL - PAINTED COLOR: DARK BRONZE PCP-3 INSULATED PRE-CAST PANEL - STEEL FORM FINISH PRECAST PANEL - PAINTED COLOR: MEDIUM GRAY NOTES: 1. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT MULLION/ FRAME: CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM 2. OVERHEAD DOCK DOOR: PRE-FINISHED WHITE 3. OVERHEAD DOCK BUMPERS: PRE-FINISHED WHITE 4. GLAZING: CLEAR LOW-E 5. HM DOORS: P-1 6. METAL SUNSHADE: SUNSHADE CANTILEVERED TYPE AS MANUFACTURED BY INDUSTRIAL LOUVERS - ST SERIES W/ 2"X24" RECTANGULAR FASCIA AND OUTRIGGERS. 2"X24" FASCIA ATTACHED TO PRECAST PANEL W/ MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD BRACKET CONNECTION. SEPARATOR SHEET, SLIP SHEET OR APPLIED COATING TO ENSURE NO REACTION BETWEEN STEEL, ALUMINUM AND OTHER DISSIMILAR MATERIALS. FINISH OF ALL COMPONENTS TO BE PRE-FINISHED WHITE. 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O. PANEL-A 133' - 0" T.O. PANEL-B 136' - 0" F T.O. SUN SHADE 114' - 0" B.O. SUN SHADE 112' - 0" CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" BACKLIT SIGNAGE INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL METAL SUNSHADE INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL PCP-1 MTL-1 PCP-2 PCP-2 MTL-1 PCP-3 INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL INSIDE PANEL TO MATCH THIS ADJACENT PANEL 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" B.O. DECK-LOW - SEE STRUCT. 130' - 5 1/2" T.O. PANEL-A 133' - 0" T.O. PANEL-B 136' - 0" 2 B.O. DECK-HIGH - SEE STRUCT. 132' - 3" B.O. SUN SHADE 112' - 0" CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" METAL SUNSHADE MTL-1 PCP-2 1.6 PCP-3 DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DRAWING INFORMATIONPHASEISSUE RECORDREGISTRATIONARCHITECTPROJECT NAMECOMPUTER DIRECTORY:SHEET DESCRIPTIONTHE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION18074 TODD MOHAGEN, AIA, NCARB I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. REGISTRATION NUMBER:CITY STAMPC:\Revit Projects\21136_694BusinessCenter_Master_jjohnson@mohagenhansen.com.rvtA301 ENLARGED ENTRY ELEVATION B.HUNKE/ T.MOHAGEN J.JOHNSON 9-30-2021 21136 694_BusinessCenter\21136_ShellAndCore CITY SUBMITTAL 694 Business Center NEW CONSTRUCTION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1/4" = 1'-0"A301 2 ENLARGED ELEVATION - ENTRY CORNER 2 1/4" = 1'-0"A301 3 ENLARGED ELEVATION - ENTRY CENTER 1/4" = 1'-0"A301 1 ENLARGED ELEVATION - ENTRY CORNER 1 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DRAWING INFORMATIONPHASEISSUE RECORDREGISTRATIONARCHITECTPROJECT NAMECOMPUTER DIRECTORY:SHEET DESCRIPTIONTHE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION18074 TODD MOHAGEN, AIA, NCARB I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. REGISTRATION NUMBER:CITY STAMPC:\Revit Projects\21136_694BusinessCenter_Master_jjohnson@mohagenhansen.com.rvtA302A RENDERING - NORTH WEST ENTRY Checker Author 9-30-2021 21136 694_BusinessCenter\21136_ShellAndCore CITY SUBMITTAL 694 Business Center NEW CONSTRUCTION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DRAWING INFORMATIONPHASEISSUE RECORDREGISTRATIONARCHITECTPROJECT NAMECOMPUTER DIRECTORY:SHEET DESCRIPTIONTHE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION18074 TODD MOHAGEN, AIA, NCARB I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. REGISTRATION NUMBER:CITY STAMPC:\Revit Projects\21136_694BusinessCenter_Master_jjohnson@mohagenhansen.com.rvtA302B RENDERING - WEST ENTRY Checker Author 9-30-2021 21136 694_BusinessCenter\21136_ShellAndCore CITY SUBMITTAL 694 Business Center NEW CONSTRUCTION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DRAWING INFORMATIONPHASEISSUE RECORDREGISTRATIONARCHITECTPROJECT NAMECOMPUTER DIRECTORY:SHEET DESCRIPTIONTHE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION18074 TODD MOHAGEN, AIA, NCARB I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. REGISTRATION NUMBER:CITY STAMPC:\Revit Projects\21136_694BusinessCenter_Master_jjohnson@mohagenhansen.com.rvtA302C RENDERING - SOUTH WEST ENTRY Checker Author 9-30-2021 21136 694_BusinessCenter\21136_ShellAndCore CITY SUBMITTAL 694 Business Center NEW CONSTRUCTION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DRAWING INFORMATIONPHASEISSUE RECORDREGISTRATIONARCHITECTPROJECT NAMECOMPUTER DIRECTORY:SHEET DESCRIPTIONTHE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION18074 TODD MOHAGEN, AIA, NCARB I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. REGISTRATION NUMBER:CITY STAMPC:\Revit Projects\21136_694BusinessCenter_Master_jjohnson@mohagenhansen.com.rvtA302D RENDERING - NORTH WEST AERIAL Checker Author 9-30-2021 21136 694_BusinessCenter\21136_ShellAndCore CITY SUBMITTAL 694 Business Center NEW CONSTRUCTION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" B.O. DECK-LOW - SEE STRUCT. 130' - 5 1/2" T.O. PANEL-A 133' - 0" DOCK LEVEL 96' - 0" T.O. PANEL-B 136' - 0" 1234 B.O. DECK-HIGH - SEE STRUCT. 132' - 3" 1 A310 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" 1.6 1ST LEVEL 100' - 0" B.O. DECK-LOW - SEE STRUCT. 130' - 5 1/2" T.O. PANEL-B 136' - 0" ABCDEFGHJK B.O. DECK-HIGH - SEE STRUCT. 132' - 3" 2 A310 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" C.4 DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DRAWING INFORMATIONPHASEISSUE RECORDREGISTRATIONARCHITECTPROJECT NAMECOMPUTER DIRECTORY:SHEET DESCRIPTIONTHE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION18074 TODD MOHAGEN, AIA, NCARB I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. REGISTRATION NUMBER:CITY STAMPC:\Revit Projects\21136_694BusinessCenter_Master_jjohnson@mohagenhansen.com.rvtA310 BUILDING SECTIONS B.HUNKE/ T.MOHAGEN J.JOHNSON 9-30-2021 21136 694_BusinessCenter\21136_ShellAndCore CITY SUBMITTAL 694 Business Center NEW CONSTRUCTION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1/16" = 1'-0"A310 2 BUILDING SECTION - NORTH-SOUTH 1/16" = 1'-0"A310 1 BUILDING SECTION - EAST-WEST NO. DESCRIPTION DATE MECH113FREEWAY BOULEVARDJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES CIRCLE NORTH49226328STORMWATERPONDBROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX COVER SHEET 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXKnow what's below.Call before you dig.Dial 811BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEXBROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 6440 JAMES CIRCLE NORTHCLARK WICKLUND, PEALLIANT ENGINEERING INC.733 MARQUETTE AVE STE 700MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2340Phone 612-758-3080/Fax 612-758-3099cwicklund@alliant-inc.comPETER GOERS, PLSALLIANT ENGINEERING INC.733 MARQUETTE AVE STE 700MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2340Phone 612-758-3080/Fax 612-758-3099dolmstead@alliant-inc.comMARK KRONBECK, PLA, ASLAALLIANT ENGINEERING INC.233 PARK AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415Phone 612-758-3080/Fax 612-758-3099mkronbeck@alliant-inc.comVICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALESITE PLAN REVIEWCONTACT: JEREMIAH JOHNSONMOHAGEN HANSEN1000 TWELVE OAKS CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 200WAYZATA, MN 55391Phone 952-426-7439/FAX 952-426-7440JJOHNSON@MOHAGENHANSEN.COMSITECIVIL ENGINEER LAND SURVEYOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ARCHITECT PROPOSEDBUILDING R=50.00L=38.35=43°56'44"R=1225.36L=128.04Δ=5°59'12"R=75.00L=59.47=45°25'41"N72°33'19"W 147.15S86°53'18"W 259.66S03°09'58"E 492.28 S89°59'21"W 147.92S15°52'18"W 388.07 FREEWAY BOULEVARDJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES AVE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX EXISTING CONDITIONS 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXPROPERTY DESCRIPTIONTract F, Registered Land Survey No 1482, Hennepin County, Minnesota.1. This survey was prepared without the benefit of a title commitment and may not depict all easements, encumbrances,and appurtenances.2. The locations of underground utilities are depicted based on Gopher State One Call, available city maps, records andfield locations and may not be exact. Verify critical utilities prior to construction or design.3. The orientation of this bearing system is based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System NAD83 (86 Adjustment).4. All distances are in feet.5. The area of the above described property is 175,384 square feet or 4.026 acres.6. The elevations at curb are to top of curb.7. Benchmark: A bridge railing in Brooklyn Center, in the bridge railing in the Northeast corner of Northbound HumboldtAvenue Bridge Number 27914 over Interstate Highway 94 and Interstate Highway 694, has an elevation of 879.29(NGVD29).NOTESLEGEND R=50.00L=38.35=43°56'44"R=1225.36L=128.04Δ=5°59'12"R=75.00L=59.47=45°25'41"N72°33'19"W 147.15S86°53'18"W 259.66S03°09'58"E 492.28 S89°59'21"W 147.92S15°52'18"W 388.07 FREEWAY BOULEVARDJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES AVE NORTHMECH113 49226328STORMWATERPONDSTOP DO NOTENTERDO NOTENTERSTOPSTOPSTOPBROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX SITE PLAN 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXSITE DATA:SITE NOTES:LEGEND: R=50.00L=38.35=43°56'44"R=1225.36L=128.04Δ=5°59'12"R=75.00L=59.47=45°25'41"N72°33'19"W 147.15S86°53'18"W 259.66S03°09'58"E 492.28 S89°59'21"W 147.92S15°52'18"W 388.07 FREEWAY BOULEVARDJAMES CIRCLE NORTH JAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES AVE NORTHMECH113 BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXGRADING NOTES:13.“”LEGEND: BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXACTIVE SWPPP LEGENDUSGS TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP WEB SOIL SURVEY MAP WEB SOIL SURVEY LEGEND1 MILE RADIUS (APPROXIMATE):SWPPP BMP QUANTITIESCONTRACTOR:PROPERTY OWNER:EROSION CONTROL RESPONSIBLE PARTIES:SWPPP INSPECTION:ENGINEER:SWPPP BMP'S Know what's below.Call before you dig.Dial 811DISTURBED AREA/IMPERVIOUS SUMMARY:PERMANENT BMPDESCRIPTION:SWPPP DESIGNER CERTIFICATION:IMPAIRED WATERSPECIAL REQUIREMENT:SILT FENCENOT TO SCALE1INLET PROTECTION SEDIMENT FILTER SACKNOT TO SCALE2NOT TO SCALE3GEOTEXTILE FILTER AT STREETINLET WITH CURB BOX (SILT SACK)NOT TO SCALE4TEMPORARY DITCH CHECK USING SEDIMENT LOG BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX SWPPP NOTES 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXEROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE: EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: ”WINTER STABLIZATION: DEWATERING: SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐POLLUTION PREVENTION‐MANAGEMENT MEASURESCONSTRUCTION SEQUENCEFINAL STABLIZATION CONTRACTOR COORDINATION: R=50.00L=38.35=43°56'44"R=1225.36L=128.04Δ=5°59'12"R=75.00L=59.47=45°25'41"N72°33'19"W 147.15S86°53'18"W 259.66S03°09'58"E 492.28 S89°59'21"W 147.92S15°52'18"W 388.07 FREEWAY BOULEVARDJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES AVE NORTHMECH113 BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX UTILITY PLAN 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAX15" PERFORATED HDPEROCK BEDDING DETAIL36" DEEP PERFORATED SUMP MH 2NOTES LEGEND: RRPER)7RRHANDICAPPEDPARKINGVEHICLE IDREQUIRED)INIS+EDGR$DE SUR)$&E9$RIES P$9EDSUR)$&E P$9E0EN77<PE9$RIES &O0P$&7ED$GGREG$7EB$SESI=ENO$7PRO&7ORDENSI7<&O0P$&7EDSUBGR$DE&ON&RE7E&URB GU77ERBROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX DETAILS 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXKnow what's below.Call before you dig.Dial 811 BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX MNDOT & ADDITIONAL DETAILS 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAX1DERO ARC RACKNOT TO SCALE2DERO ARC RACK SPACINGNOT TO SCALEC-6.13TREE PROTECTION FENCENOT TO SCALEC-6.1C-6.1C-6.14A.D.A. ACCESSIBLE STALL SLOPESNOT TO SCALE5MNDOT PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAILSNOT TO SCALEC-6.1Know what's below.Call before you dig.Dial 811PO:DER&O$7BL$&.&OLOR:I7+GLOSS)INIS+0$7&+BUILDING)$&$DE$&&EN7SNO7EBI.ER$&.7OBESUR)$&E0OUN7ED7O&ON&RE7EP$D:I7+0ID:ES7)$S7ENERŠ;G$L9$NI=ED:EDGEE;P$NSION$N&+ORSUR)$&E0OUN7BI.ER$&.7OPRO9IDED&ON&RE7EP$9E0EN7RE)ER7OSI7EPL$N)ORLO&$7IONO)BI.ER$&.SONSI7E MECH113R=50.00L=38.35=43°56'44"R=1225.36L=128.04Δ=5°59'12"R=75.00L=59.47=45°25'41"N72°33'19"W 147.15S86°53'18"W 259.66S03°09'58"E 492.28 S89°59'21"W 147.92S15°52'18"W 388.07 FREEWAY BOULEVARDJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES CIRCLE NORTHBROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX LANDSCAPE PLAN 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXLEGEND: LANDSCAPE NOTES: SEEDING NOTES BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX ---- ---- LANDSCAPE DETAILS 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXTREE PLANTING DETAILSHRUB PLANTING DETAIL3PERENNIAL PLANTINGSNOT TO SCALEMULCH AT SOD DETAILNOT TO SCALE5MULCH AT SIDEWALK DETAILNOT TO SCALE4 R=50.00L=38.35=43°56'44"R=1225.36L=128.04Δ=5°59'12"R=75.00L=59.47=45°25'41"N72°33'19"W 147.15S86°53'18"W 259.66S03°09'58"E 492.28 S89°59'21"W 147.92S15°52'18"W 388.07 FREEWAY BOULEVARDJAMES CIRCLE NORTH JAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES AVE NORTHMECH113WP1WP1WP1WP1WP1WP1 AA4AA4AA4AA4WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2AA2AA2AA2WP1WP1WP1WP1WP10.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.20.30.30.20.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.20.30.30.40.40.30.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.40.50.60.50.40.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.20.20.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.30.40.60.70.70.70.50.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.30.30.30.20.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.40.60.70.90.90.80.70.50.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.40.50.50.40.30.20.20.20.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.30.50.80.91.11.11.00.90.70.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.60.70.70.60.40.40.40.40.30.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.40.71.01.21.31.41.31.10.90.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.00.00.10.60.80.90.90.80.60.60.60.60.60.40.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.51.01.31.41.51.61.51.50.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.41.30.40.10.10.10.81.11.21.11.00.80.70.80.80.80.60.30.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.30.71.51.81.81.71.81.92.10.87.30.90.10.00.01.51.61.51.41.10.90.91.01.01.10.90.50.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.31.12.12.32.11.91.92.33.66.72.72.01.61.21.01.11.21.31.41.30.70.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.51.52.92.92.52.12.12.74.85.13.22.31.71.31.11.21.41.61.81.90.90.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.40.62.13.93.62.82.22.32.94.23.73.42.61.91.41.21.41.72.12.42.51.00.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.40.72.64.64.03.12.42.42.93.74.43.92.92.01.51.31.62.02.53.13.20.80.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.40.72.64.33.93.12.52.42.73.04.43.93.02.11.51.41.72.22.73.43.80.60.30.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.72.23.53.42.92.62.52.52.63.83.72.92.11.61.41.72.22.83.43.70.50.30.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.61.82.82.92.82.72.62.42.23.43.42.92.21.61.41.72.12.63.13.10.50.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.61.52.32.62.72.82.72.52.23.33.43.02.31.71.51.72.02.32.52.50.60.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.61.32.02.42.62.82.82.72.53.83.63.12.31.71.51.71.92.12.11.90.60.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.61.21.82.22.52.93.03.44.46.94.13.22.41.81.61.71.81.92.01.50.50.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.30.61.21.82.22.52.93.34.18.56.54.33.22.41.81.61.71.81.91.91.30.50.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.30.71.31.92.22.63.03.54.24.55.24.23.32.31.71.61.71.92.01.91.30.40.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.30.81.62.12.42.73.03.44.03.84.43.93.02.21.61.61.71.92.12.11.50.30.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.31.02.02.52.62.82.93.23.52.93.63.42.82.11.61.51.82.12.42.51.90.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.41.32.63.02.92.82.93.03.12.03.13.12.62.01.51.51.92.32.83.12.20.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.30.51.83.53.63.12.82.82.82.91.42.92.92.51.91.51.62.02.53.13.62.30.30.20.10.10.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.40.72.24.34.13.32.82.72.82.91.02.53.02.92.51.91.51.62.02.63.23.82.10.40.20.10.10.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.40.72.44.54.13.32.82.72.93.51.24.03.63.02.41.81.51.62.02.53.13.41.80.30.20.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.62.13.83.73.02.72.73.25.311.14.83.22.41.81.41.51.82.22.62.81.50.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.51.72.93.02.82.62.83.44.84.25.34.53.42.51.81.51.51.72.02.12.21.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.51.32.32.52.52.62.83.34.24.64.33.42.51.81.51.51.71.81.91.70.90.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.41.11.82.22.32.62.83.23.63.93.93.22.41.81.61.61.71.81.81.50.70.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.40.91.41.82.22.62.93.03.13.33.43.02.41.81.61.61.71.81.81.40.60.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.40.81.21.62.12.63.03.13.02.93.12.92.31.81.51.61.71.81.91.40.50.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.71.11.52.02.73.13.43.52.83.02.82.31.71.51.61.82.02.01.70.50.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.30.61.01.42.02.83.33.75.53.13.12.82.21.61.51.72.02.22.42.30.40.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.30.50.91.42.12.83.74.13.54.83.62.92.21.61.51.82.22.73.02.80.30.20.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.40.81.52.23.04.04.64.17.84.03.02.21.61.61.92.43.03.63.30.40.20.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.40.81.52.43.24.35.14.35.14.13.12.11.61.72.02.53.13.73.40.40.30.10.10.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.71.72.83.64.34.64.94.63.93.02.21.71.72.12.63.13.53.00.40.20.10.10.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.61.83.44.14.44.54.62.52.11.63.93.62.92.21.81.82.02.42.83.02.40.30.10.10.10.00.10.10.20.20.40.61.94.14.74.64.44.22.92.72.53.43.32.92.31.81.82.02.32.52.51.90.20.10.10.00.00.10.10.20.20.40.61.74.45.24.74.34.13.54.53.23.22.82.31.81.82.02.22.42.31.50.30.10.10.00.00.10.10.20.20.40.61.33.94.94.54.24.24.24.23.23.12.82.21.81.82.02.22.32.21.30.30.10.10.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.50.92.84.03.93.94.34.65.63.93.83.22.62.11.71.82.02.32.52.41.20.20.10.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.30.61.83.03.33.64.24.95.710.95.23.32.51.91.71.82.12.52.72.71.20.20.10.10.00.00.10.10.10.20.20.41.22.22.73.23.85.05.85.24.53.32.41.71.61.82.22.73.23.11.00.20.10.10.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.30.81.52.12.83.74.96.14.44.03.12.21.61.51.82.32.93.53.70.60.30.20.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.30.61.01.62.43.34.67.13.53.32.71.91.51.41.72.22.83.43.90.60.30.20.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.40.71.22.02.93.96.82.62.62.21.71.41.31.62.12.73.23.40.50.30.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.51.01.72.43.11.41.92.01.91.51.21.21.41.82.22.62.70.50.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.40.81.42.02.40.90.00.00.00.00.23.91.41.61.61.41.11.11.31.51.72.02.00.50.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.61.11.61.80.60.20.00.00.00.11.00.80.10.00.10.11.01.21.31.21.01.01.11.21.41.51.40.50.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.50.91.21.30.40.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.00.10.10.70.91.01.00.90.80.91.01.11.10.90.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.40.70.90.40.30.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.60.70.80.80.70.70.70.80.80.80.60.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.30.50.70.20.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.40.60.60.60.60.50.50.60.60.50.30.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.40.50.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.30.40.50.40.40.30.40.40.40.30.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.30.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.30.30.30.20.20.20.20.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01 fc1 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.25 fc0.25 fcBROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAX Exhibit B The City Council consensus was reached to start the City Council retreat on June 26,2021, at 8:30 a.m. or 9 a.m. INFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK FOR THE OPPORTUNITY SITE DISCUSSION Dr. Edwards introduced the item and stated this item relates to the Opportunity Site infrastructure, sewer, and streets that can be moved forward. He asked if the City Council is available to meet on June 14, 2021, at 5 o'clock to provide information and move forward with this item. He noted this item has been delayed several times and is now time-sensitive in the context of all of the other items related to the Opportunity Site. Mayor Elliott polled the Council Members on availability on June 14,2021. Councilmember Ryan stated he is available at 5 p.m. for a briefing on the Opportunity Site before the regular June 14, 2021, City Council meeting. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she is also available. Councilmember Butler stated she will not be available to attend the June 14, 2021 meetings. Mayor Elliott asked whether it is known if Councilmember Graves is available at 5 p.m. Dr. Edwards stated he does not know at this time and can update the City Council once her schedule is confirmed. Mayor Elliott stated in his view, it is a meeting that all or a majority of the City Council should be present and asked staff to follow up with Councilmember Graves. Dr. Edwards suggested if Councilmember Graves is not available at 5 p.m., he present potential dates that would not be the same night as a regular Council meeting. The City Council agreed with the suggestion of Dr. Edwards. DISCUSSION OF WORK SESSION AGENDA ITEMS AS TIME PERMITS CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR 6440 JAMES CIRCLE Acting City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited Ms. Beekman to present the staff report. Community Development Director Meg Beekman displayed a PowerPoint presentation and stated this is a concept proposal for a 694 business center on the property at 6441 James Circle,the former Earle Brown bowling site that has been vacant for some time. She stated the interior of the building has been largely demolished and removed and the shell of the building remains with the rest of the site being vacant. Ms. Beekman stated this review is an opportunity for the City Council to ask questions and offer comments on a specific concept proposal before it comes as a formal land use application to the Planning Commission and City Council. The City Council could indicate if they are open to this concept and staff encourages questions by the developer and Council Members but this is a non- binding conversation. The City Council is not being asked to take formal action but, rather, OS/24/21 3- Exhibit C provide feedback and give direction to staff and the developer as they continue to work on the project. Ms. Beekman displayed a map of the subject 4-acre site, noting it is zoned C2 and guided for Business Mixed Use,which is a new land use designation created in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan to identify a base for what has historically been considered a light industrial district with broader land uses to create a business center-type of the environment to accommodate manufacturing, warehouse, and distribution, office, as well as hotels, restaurants, and other types of services that businesses within a business center might rely on or want to have. Residential is not a permitted use within the Business Mixed Use district but generally is a flexible land use otherwise. Ms. Beekman stated this site was acquired by Toushouta Tupra in 2017 and subsequently has gone through a Special Use Permit(SUP) approval process to allow for an event center. That SUP was renewed in 2019 but to date, that use has not come forward due to challenges with financing and identifying the right use for this property. The proposal is to demolish the existing structure and construct a 64,000 sq. ft. flex office light industrial building. She displayed an exterior building elevation, noting generally it would be thought these us s are conducive to office space, manufacturing, distribution, and warehousing. A similar development would be the Caribou headquarters that has a wide variety of flexible uses. Ms. Beekman stated the stormwater, parking, and truck circulation would be contained on-site without shared stormwater and parking as had been proposed previously. This project would be developed speculatively with tenants identified after approval and construction commenced. While the tenants are not known at this time, we can surmise what they might be based on market demands and what is being built in other communities. Ms. Beekman displayed a site plan, noting the 50-foot front setback from James Circle and 25- foot rear and side setbacks. The Zoning Code requires front yard setbacks on all sides fronting on major roadways. But in this case, to make the site work, one of the flexibilities would be around allowing lesser setbacks at the rear and side. It would also require a rezoning to PUD Business Mixed Use. The parking shows 80 stalls. She explained the parking demand is difficult to calculate as the parking requirement is based on use and we don't yet know the tenant mix. Also, over time, tenants can change. Ms. Beekman explained how staff calculated the parking requirement at 122 stalls, meaning that as proposed there would be a parking deficiency. One of the factors playing into this is the need to understand what the land uses will be and a parking study would be required to understand that. She stated this may include some land-use obstructions as part of the development agreement. She noted the City's current parking restrictions were established in the 1960s and are currently under review as part of the Zoning Code update. Ms. Beekman stated about financing, the developer has indicated an initial project gap of $1.4 million so Ehlers has been asked to review that documentation. Ehlers indicated they don't feel a 26-year TIF district would be supported by the project. The City knows the funds generated by a TIF district can only be applied to TIF eligible expenditures so the City needs to better understand what those eligible expenditures are to understand how the amount of TIF generated will pair with what might be eligible for costs. As part of a public subsidy application request,the amount of the subsidy has to be warranted in addition to those costs for eligible uses. The public subsidy OS/24/21 4- application will need to be fully analyzed and Ehlers will identify a recommendation regarding that. TIF will need to be found warranted by the City Council and then the City's public subsidypolicywouldapply. Ms. Beekman explained that based on tonight's discussion, the developer can proceed with a formal review process. In this case, it would be a Planning Case application for a PUD, rezoning,and a site and building plan review. These applications will go through the Planning CommissionfortheofficialpublichearingandrecommendationtotheCityCouncil. If a public subsidy is pursued, it would go through a formal review by the City's financial consultants to identify the warrants and pair those with eligible costs to assure there is a need for TIF and the subsequent useisappropriate. Any application for TIF would receive a formal review by both the City CouncilandEDAandrequireapublichearing. Ms. Beekman stated the discussion this evening is for City Council questions or comments directly related to the proposed concept including land use and site layout and if the City Council is opentoTIFiffoundtobewarrantedinthiscase. She noted this site has been vacant for several yearsandstruggledtofindthebestuse. She stated the developer is available to make a further presentation and answer questions of the City Council. Mayor Elliott stated he would like to wait to see what the Planning Commission comes back with. Councilmember Ryan stated when we consider the range and types of commercial development, retail is pretty much dead and we don't see demand for office, but in conversations, he has had with the Development Director, speculative light industrial buildings are attracting interest in a lot of places. He stated he would be favorably disposed to the concept and should it go forward, then the City Council and EDA may have a conversation about what types of restrictions should be placed in the zoning to ensure certain undesirable uses don't go into the property. He stated he isopentoTIFifitisdeterminedtobewarranted. Mayor Elliott stated on the retail sector, his thoughts are that retail for part of the market may beexperiencingretractionbutitdependsonthepartofthemarketyouaretalkingabout. He asked who we are building retail for, noting as an example, retail-like the Somali mall is bursting at theseamsandtheyneedmorespace. He stated it depends who you are building retail for as it couldbedeadorverymuchalive. Mayor Elliott stated he is interested in seeing what they come back with in terms of the financial package or the uses might be. Generally speaking,he thinks the CityCouncilshouldlookawayfromspeculativemarketsinsomecasesandbemoreintentionalinterms of the vision the City is building out for Brooklyn Center and how to go about building and specifically identifying the needs of the community. Patrick McGlynn, the developer, stated he is a multi-family developer that Mr. Tupra has brought on board to help develop this site he purchased three years ago. Mr. McGlynn stated he advised Mr. Tupra that doing an office-type or retail-type building in this market was probably not a greatidea. They decided the industrial market was growing at an incredible rate,there is quite a demand for that product demand, and they have already fielded several calls from interested tenants for this project type. He stated they are looking forward to getting something new and fresh on a site OS/24/21 5_ that has been underutilized,poorly maintained, and carries a connotation that the City of Brooklyn Center no longer wants to see, and neither do they. Mr. McGlynn stated they are excited to create some jobs for the City and deal with some of the environmental impacts of new construction. They have already applied for some programs with Xcel Energy and Center Point Energy to do their green building initiative and solar programs. They are working closely together to design the industrial building of the future that will be a transition into what new construction becomes. He stated he greatly appreciates the City Council taking the time to fit them into their agenda, noting the City Council has more pressing matters. He offered to answer questions of the City Council. Councilmember Ryan asked Mr. McGlynn to elaborate on his comment that retail and conventional office is probably not a good idea right now. He noted one concern of the City Council is how much market-rate development the City needs to have both in terms of relieving homestead property taxpayers so there is a tax base and financial wherewithal to do other types of development. He also asked Mr. McGlynn if he has experience with building this type of green building. Mr. McGlynn stated he has never done an industrial building but his partner, Josh Budish with Endeavor Development, spent the last number of years with Duke Realty, a nationally run company that focuses entirely on industrial property in the Midwest market. Mr. Boodish spearheaded their Minneapolis market so they have partnered with him on this project since he has intimate knowledge of what tenants are looking for, type of demand, aspects of construction that are important to tenants, and what brings businesses to certain areas. Mr. McGlynn stated the location of this site is very positive for industrial as it is easy to access, close to major highways, and feeds the demand for that type of product. He stated he does not think retail is necessarily dead and there is a need for well-placed retail. Councilmember Ryan stated Mr. McGlynn had mentioned that Brooklyn Center, in his opinion, is over retailed during a discussion on a different project. He noted some people may be put off by the term `speculative industrial' but in this market, it would be far more speculative to build retail unless it is extremely well placed and well-positioned, such as in Edina in a higher-income area. And to say nothing of the office where the trend is more people working from home. He stated when constructing an industrial building that does not have committed tenants is where the term speculative industrial' comes from but considering this is a growing segment of the real estate redevelopment market, he thinks it is probably a better bet than the other two options. Mr. McGlynn stated if you look at speculative buildings proposed and under construction now, 90% of the time before those buildings are completed, they are fully leased and committed. He explained they call it `speculative' to leave it open to multiple users to then tailor it to their specific needs, whether a larger office component and smaller manufacturing component or a larger manufacturing component and a smaller office component. That is where the term comes from. He stated they intend that this building will be fully committed before they even start construction since they have already had an interest in this location before they even have government approvals or architectural drawings completed. OS/24/21 6- ADJOURNMENT Mayor Elliott adjourned the Study Session at 6:48 p.m. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COLTNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss. Certification of Minutes CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER) The undersigned,being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, certifies: 1. That attached hereto is a full,true,and complete transcript of the minutes of a Study Session of the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center held on May 24, 2021. 2. That said meeting was held pursuant to due call and notice thereof and was duly held at Brooklyn Center City Hall. 3. That the City Council adopted said minutes at its June 14, 2021, Regular Session. City Clerk Mayor OS/24/21 7- M E M O R A N D U M DATE: November 10, 2021 TO: Ginny McIntosh, City Planner/Zoning Administrator FROM: Andrew Hogg, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Preliminary Site Plan – Crest Phase II Public Works staff reviewed the following documents submitted for review for the proposed Crest Phase II: Preliminary Plans dated August 8, 2021 Subject to final staff Site Plan approval, the referenced plans must be revised in accordance with the following comments/revisions and approved prior to issuance of Land Alteration permit. C1.0 – Existing Conditions 1. Provide demo and removals plan. 2.Protect existing sidewalk and utilities along Freeway Boulevard. C2.0 – Grading Plan 3.Align NW entrance to match centerline of entrance on west side of James Circle N. 4.Shift SE to allow for truck/trailer parking on ramp. 5. Remove North entrance on to Freeway Boulevard. 6. Provide detailed vehicle turning and tracking movement diagrams for delivery vehicles, garbage trucks, bus, etc. demonstrating specific and actual routes. 7.Meet zoning code green space requirements. C3.0 – Grading Plan 8. Review parking lot flooding in 100-yr event. 9.Clean up text and provide additional elevation. C5.0, – Utility Plan & Stormwater Details 10. Provide easements as noted on utility plan. 11.Utility Facilities Easement Agreement is required. C6.0, 6.1 – Detail Sheets 12. All work performed and materials used for construction of public utilities must conform to the City standard specifications and details. The City’s standard details must be included in the plan. 13.Update to use current City plates. Miscellaneous 14. See redlines for additional Site Plan comments. 15. Provide irrigation plan. Exhibit D Brooklyn Center Office Flex Site Plan Review Memo, November 10, 2021 16. Upon project completion the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures; and provide certified record drawings of all project plan sheets depicting any associated private and/or public improvements, revisions and adjustments prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The as-built survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project as determined and directed by the City Engineer. 17. Inspection for the private site improvements must be performed by the developer’s design/project engineer. Upon project completion, the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer’s immediate and direct supervision. The engineer must be certified in the State of Minnesota and must certify all required as-built drawings (which are separate from the as-built survey). 18. The total disturbed area exceeds one acre, an NPDES permit is required. The total disturbed area is less than five acres; the City of Brooklyn Center will review the plans per the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission rules. Applicant must meet requirements from the watershed’s rules review. 19. Applicant must apply for a Land Disturbance permit. Prior to Issuance of a Land Alteration 20. Final construction/demolition plans and specifications need to be received and approved by the City Engineer in form and format as determined by the City. The final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan and/or as amended, as required by the City Engineer. 21. A letter of credit or a cash escrow in the amount of 100 percent of the estimated cost as determined by City staff shall be deposited with the City. 22. During construction of the site improvements and until the permanent turf and plantings are established, the developer will be required to reimburse the City for the administration and engineering inspection efforts. Please submit a deposit of $2,500 that the City can draw upon on a monthly basis. 23. A Construction Management Plan and Agreement is required that addresses general construction activities and management provisions, traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions, tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions, definition of responsibility p rovisions, temporar y parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non-compliance provisions. A separate $2,500 deposit will be required as part of the non-compliance provision. Anticipated Permitting 24. A City Land Disturbance permit is required. 25.Watershed plan review is required. 26. A MPCA NPDES permit is required. 27. Other permits not listed may be required and is the responsibility of the developer to obtain and warrant. 28. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of applicable building and land disturbance permits. Brooklyn Center Office Flex Site Plan Review Memo, November 10, 2021 29. A preconstruction conference must be scheduled and held with City staff and other entities designated by the City. The aforementioned comments are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Other guarantees and site development conditions may be further prescribed throughout the project as warranted and determined by the City. MECH113FREEWAY BOULEVARDJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES CIRCLENORTH49226328STORMWATERPONDBROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX COVER SHEET 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXKnow what's below.Call before you dig.Dial 811BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEXBROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 6440 JAMES CIRCLE NORTHCLARK WICKLUND, PEALLIANT ENGINEERING INC.733 MARQUETTE AVE STE 700MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2340Phone 612-758-3080/Fax 612-758-3099cwicklund@alliant-inc.comPETER GOERS, PLSALLIANT ENGINEERING INC.733 MARQUETTE AVE STE 700MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2340Phone 612-758-3080/Fax 612-758-3099dolmstead@alliant-inc.comMARK KRONBECK, PLA, ASLAALLIANT ENGINEERING INC.233 PARK AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415Phone 612-758-3080/Fax 612-758-3099mkronbeck@alliant-inc.comVICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALESITE PLAN REVIEWCONTACT: JEREMIAH JOHNSONMOHAGEN HANSEN1000 TWELVE OAKS CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 200WAYZATA, MN 55391Phone 952-426-7439/FAX 952-426-7440JJOHNSON@MOHAGENHANSEN.COMSITECIVIL ENGINEERLAND SURVEYORLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ARCHITECTPROPOSEDBUILDING R=50.00L=38.35=43°56'44"R=1225.36L=128.04Δ=5°59'12"R=75.00L=59.47=45°25'41"N72°33'19"W 147.15S86°53'18"W 259.66S03°09'58"E 492.28 S89°59'21"W 147.92S15°52'18"W 388.07 FREEWAY BOULEVARDJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES AVE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX EXISTING CONDITIONS 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXPROPERTY DESCRIPTIONTract F, Registered Land Survey No 1482, Hennepin County, Minnesota.1. This survey was prepared without the benefit of a title commitment and may not depict all easements, encumbrances,and appurtenances.2. The locations of underground utilities are depicted based on Gopher State One Call, available city maps, records andfield locations and may not be exact. Verify critical utilities prior to construction or design.3. The orientation of this bearing system is based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System NAD83 (86 Adjustment).4. All distances are in feet.5. The area of the above described property is 175,384 square feet or 4.026 acres.6. The elevations at curb are to top of curb.7. Benchmark: A bridge railing in Brooklyn Center, in the bridge railing in the Northeast corner of Northbound HumboldtAvenue Bridge Number 27914 over Interstate Highway 94 and Interstate Highway 694, has an elevation of 879.29(NGVD29).NOTESLEGEND* Demo and Removals Plan Needed Lighen up ex pavement hatch so that underlying information is more visibleVerify ex pipe materialLabel pipe size & material fix line typeChange leader linetype so that it does not look like storm lines -typ.Show existing tree & landscapingFix Certification Protect R=50.00L=38.35=43°56'44"R=1225.36L=128.04Δ=5°59'12"R=75.00L=59.47=45°25'41"N72°33'19"W 147.15S86°53'18"W 259.66S03°09'58"E 492.28 S89°59'21"W 147.92S15°52'18"W 388.07 FREEWAY BOULEVARDJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES AVE NORTHMECH113 49226328STORMWATERPONDSTOP DO NOTENTERDO NOTENTERSTOPSTOPSTOPBROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX SITE PLAN 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXSITE DATA:SITE NOTES:LEGEND:Location of Transformer? End SidewalkReview for greenspace area to install fenceRemove Access to Freeway Blvd.Match centerline of entrance on west side of James CircleWhere is this shown on Arch?Provide truck turning template exhibitShow City standard commercial aprons at all drivewaysShow ex. sidewalk for tie-inProvide slope protection (guardrail or bollards) -TypBuilding over setback lineIf building is going to have multiple tenants, then ADA parking should be spread out and located near each bayProvide concrete pad for stair landings? - typTrash Encl?verify 24' min drive aisle with truck/trailer parkedAdjust to meet requirementsShift entrance drive east to allow truck/trailer parking on trunk ramp?RemoveVerify building not over setbackShow curb replacements and replacement walkCommercial Driveway apronVerify B612, Match City Plate20' Radius? R=50.00L=38.35=43°56'44"R=1225.36L=128.04Δ=5°59'12"R=75.00L=59.47=45°25'41"N72°33'19"W 147.15S86°53'18"W 259.66S03°09'58"E 492.28 S89°59'21"W 147.92S15°52'18"W 388.07 FREEWAY BOULEVARDJAMES CIRCLE NORTH JAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES AVE NORTHMECH113 BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXGRADING NOTES:13.“”LEGEND:Provide grading detail to ensure ADA compliant ramps/entranceLabel pavement & gutter slopes3:1 max slope or install retaining wallHow is this a drainage divide?Drainage arrow is incorrectAdd spot elevTop of curb and parking lot below 100-yr basin elev - will floodProvide addl curb elev's - typadd curb elevations for replacement curb sectionInlet ProtectionInlet ProtectionInlet ProtectionVerify less than 3 to 1 slopeSpotSpotInlet ProtectionstopsInlet ProtectionSpotRemove BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXACTIVE SWPPP LEGENDUSGS TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP WEB SOIL SURVEY MAP WEB SOIL SURVEY LEGEND1 MILE RADIUS (APPROXIMATE):SWPPP BMP QUANTITIESCONTRACTOR:PROPERTY OWNER:EROSION CONTROL RESPONSIBLE PARTIES:SWPPP INSPECTION:ENGINEER:SWPPP BMP'S Know what's below.Call before you dig.Dial 811DISTURBED AREA/IMPERVIOUS SUMMARY:PERMANENT BMPDESCRIPTION:SWPPP DESIGNER CERTIFICATION:IMPAIRED WATERSPECIAL REQUIREMENT:SILT FENCENOT TO SCALE1INLET PROTECTION SEDIMENT FILTER SACKNOT TO SCALE2NOT TO SCALE3GEOTEXTILE FILTER AT STREETINLET WITH CURB BOX (SILT SACK)NOT TO SCALE4TEMPORARY DITCH CHECK USING SEDIMENT LOG BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX SWPPP NOTES 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXEROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE: EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: ”WINTER STABLIZATION: DEWATERING: SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐POLLUTION PREVENTION‐MANAGEMENT MEASURESCONSTRUCTION SEQUENCEFINAL STABLIZATION CONTRACTOR COORDINATION: R=50.00L=38.35=43°56'44"R=1225.36L=128.04Δ=5°59'12"R=75.00L=59.47=45°25'41"N72°33'19"W 147.15S86°53'18"W 259.66S03°09'58"E 492.28 S89°59'21"W 147.92S15°52'18"W 388.07 FREEWAY BOULEVARDJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES AVE NORTHMECH113 BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX UTILITY PLAN 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAX15" PERFORATED HDPEROCK BEDDING DETAIL36" DEEP PERFORATED SUMP MH 2NOTES LEGEND: Verify roof drainage area vs pipe size - typVerify allowable pipe material for building servicesVerify allowable pipe material for building servicesLabel bendsShow fire dept connection and indicator valve locationsThis is lower that 100-yr pond elev, which means water will back-up into building systemVerify clearance between san service and storm pipeIs trench drain really going to be 5' deep w/sump? See trench drain detailIs infiltration from a truck dock area appropriate? potential pollution/spills concernslabel 10' seperationFix NoteProvide utility easement over storm line from ex cb on James Cir to ex cb on Freeway blvdProvide drainage & utility easement over proposed basinProvide utility easement over ex. electric to remainRequired storm water management/maintenance agreement?Verify operation of ex. valve & replace as requiredVerify operation of ex. valve & replace as requiredVerify ex. pipe inv elev??? RRPER)7RRHANDICAPPEDPARKINGVEHICLE IDREQUIRED)INIS+EDGR$DE SUR)$&E9$RIES P$9EDSUR)$&E P$9E0EN77<PE9$RIES &O0P$&7ED$GGREG$7EB$SESI=ENO$7PRO&7ORDENSI7<&O0P$&7EDSUBGR$DE&ON&RE7E&URB GU77ERBROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX DETAILS 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXKnow what's below.Call before you dig.Dial 811Use City detail for items in Public Right of WayWhere used?Where used?Show & label locations on site planLabel or note locations on site planreinforcement?recommend 6"Where usedWhere used where used9' on site plan BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX MNDOT & ADDITIONAL DETAILS 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAX1DERO ARC RACKNOT TO SCALE2DERO ARC RACK SPACINGNOT TO SCALEC-6.13TREE PROTECTION FENCENOT TO SCALEC-6.1C-6.1C-6.14A.D.A. ACCESSIBLE STALL SLOPESNOT TO SCALE5MNDOT PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAILSNOT TO SCALEC-6.1Know what's below.Call before you dig.Dial 811PO:DER&O$7BL$&.&OLOR:I7+GLOSS)INIS+0$7&+BUILDING)$&$DE$&&EN7SNO7EBI.ER$&.7OBESUR)$&E0OUN7ED7O&ON&RE7EP$D:I7+0ID:ES7)$S7ENERŠ;G$L9$NI=ED:EDGEE;P$NSION$N&+ORSUR)$&E0OUN7BI.ER$&.7OPRO9IDED&ON&RE7EP$9E0EN7RE)ER7OSI7EPL$N)ORLO&$7IONO)BI.ER$&.SONSI7EShow & label on site planWhere Used MECH113R=50.00L=38.35=43°56'44"R=1225.36L=128.04Δ=5°59'12"R=75.00L=59.47=45°25'41"N72°33'19"W 147.15S86°53'18"W 259.66S03°09'58"E 492.28 S89°59'21"W 147.92S15°52'18"W 388.07 FREEWAY BOULEVARDJAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES CIRCLE NORTHBROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX LANDSCAPE PLAN 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXLEGEND: LANDSCAPE NOTES: SEEDING NOTES 5 canes min?What's in large spaces between plantings? - typVerify that there is enough room for fully grown red maple along eastern parking lot area Recommend considering a columnar species of treeLabelNo BH on listShow ex. tree & landscapingFix certification BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX ---- ---- LANDSCAPE DETAILS 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXTREE PLANTING DETAILSHRUB PLANTING DETAIL3PERENNIAL PLANTINGSNOT TO SCALEMULCH AT SOD DETAILNOT TO SCALE5MULCH AT SIDEWALK DETAILNOT TO SCALE4Fix certification R=50.00L=38.35=43°56'44"R=1225.36L=128.04Δ=5°59'12"R=75.00L=59.47=45°25'41"N72°33'19"W 147.15S86°53'18"W 259.66S03°09'58"E 492.28 S89°59'21"W 147.92S15°52'18"W 388.07 FREEWAY BOULEVARDJAMES CIRCLE NORTH JAMES CIRCLE NORTHJAMES AVE NORTHMECH113WP1WP1WP1WP1WP1WP1 AA4AA4AA4AA4WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2WP2AA2AA2AA2WP1WP1WP1WP1WP10.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.20.30.30.20.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.20.30.30.40.40.30.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.40.50.60.50.40.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.20.20.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.30.40.60.70.70.70.50.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.30.30.30.20.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.40.60.70.90.90.80.70.50.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.40.50.50.40.30.20.20.20.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.30.50.80.91.11.11.00.90.70.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.60.70.70.60.40.40.40.40.30.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.40.71.01.21.31.41.31.10.90.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.00.00.10.60.80.90.90.80.60.60.60.60.60.40.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.51.01.31.41.51.61.51.50.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.41.30.40.10.10.10.81.11.21.11.00.80.70.80.80.80.60.30.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.30.71.51.81.81.71.81.92.10.87.30.90.10.00.01.51.61.51.41.10.90.91.01.01.10.90.50.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.31.12.12.32.11.91.92.33.66.72.72.01.61.21.01.11.21.31.41.30.70.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.51.52.92.92.52.12.12.74.85.13.22.31.71.31.11.21.41.61.81.90.90.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.40.62.13.93.62.82.22.32.94.23.73.42.61.91.41.21.41.72.12.42.51.00.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.40.72.64.64.03.12.42.42.93.74.43.92.92.01.51.31.62.02.53.13.20.80.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.40.72.64.33.93.12.52.42.73.04.43.93.02.11.51.41.72.22.73.43.80.60.30.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.72.23.53.42.92.62.52.52.63.83.72.92.11.61.41.72.22.83.43.70.50.30.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.61.82.82.92.82.72.62.42.23.43.42.92.21.61.41.72.12.63.13.10.50.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.61.52.32.62.72.82.72.52.23.33.43.02.31.71.51.72.02.32.52.50.60.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.61.32.02.42.62.82.82.72.53.83.63.12.31.71.51.71.92.12.11.90.60.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.61.21.82.22.52.93.03.44.46.94.13.22.41.81.61.71.81.92.01.50.50.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.30.61.21.82.22.52.93.34.18.56.54.33.22.41.81.61.71.81.91.91.30.50.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.30.71.31.92.22.63.03.54.24.55.24.23.32.31.71.61.71.92.01.91.30.40.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.30.81.62.12.42.73.03.44.03.84.43.93.02.21.61.61.71.92.12.11.50.30.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.31.02.02.52.62.82.93.23.52.93.63.42.82.11.61.51.82.12.42.51.90.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.41.32.63.02.92.82.93.03.12.03.13.12.62.01.51.51.92.32.83.12.20.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.30.51.83.53.63.12.82.82.82.91.42.92.92.51.91.51.62.02.53.13.62.30.30.20.10.10.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.40.72.24.34.13.32.82.72.82.91.02.53.02.92.51.91.51.62.02.63.23.82.10.40.20.10.10.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.40.72.44.54.13.32.82.72.93.51.24.03.63.02.41.81.51.62.02.53.13.41.80.30.20.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.62.13.83.73.02.72.73.25.311.14.83.22.41.81.41.51.82.22.62.81.50.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.51.72.93.02.82.62.83.44.84.25.34.53.42.51.81.51.51.72.02.12.21.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.51.32.32.52.52.62.83.34.24.64.33.42.51.81.51.51.71.81.91.70.90.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.41.11.82.22.32.62.83.23.63.93.93.22.41.81.61.61.71.81.81.50.70.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.40.91.41.82.22.62.93.03.13.33.43.02.41.81.61.61.71.81.81.40.60.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.40.81.21.62.12.63.03.13.02.93.12.92.31.81.51.61.71.81.91.40.50.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.71.11.52.02.73.13.43.52.83.02.82.31.71.51.61.82.02.01.70.50.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.30.61.01.42.02.83.33.75.53.13.12.82.21.61.51.72.02.22.42.30.40.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.30.50.91.42.12.83.74.13.54.83.62.92.21.61.51.82.22.73.02.80.30.20.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.40.81.52.23.04.04.64.17.84.03.02.21.61.61.92.43.03.63.30.40.20.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.40.81.52.43.24.35.14.35.14.13.12.11.61.72.02.53.13.73.40.40.30.10.10.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.71.72.83.64.34.64.94.63.93.02.21.71.72.12.63.13.53.00.40.20.10.10.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.61.83.44.14.44.54.62.52.11.63.93.62.92.21.81.82.02.42.83.02.40.30.10.10.10.00.10.10.20.20.40.61.94.14.74.64.44.22.92.72.53.43.32.92.31.81.82.02.32.52.51.90.20.10.10.00.00.10.10.20.20.40.61.74.45.24.74.34.13.54.53.23.22.82.31.81.82.02.22.42.31.50.30.10.10.00.00.10.10.20.20.40.61.33.94.94.54.24.24.24.23.23.12.82.21.81.82.02.22.32.21.30.30.10.10.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.50.92.84.03.93.94.34.65.63.93.83.22.62.11.71.82.02.32.52.41.20.20.10.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.30.61.83.03.33.64.24.95.710.95.23.32.51.91.71.82.12.52.72.71.20.20.10.10.00.00.10.10.10.20.20.41.22.22.73.23.85.05.85.24.53.32.41.71.61.82.22.73.23.11.00.20.10.10.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.30.81.52.12.83.74.96.14.44.03.12.21.61.51.82.32.93.53.70.60.30.20.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.30.61.01.62.43.34.67.13.53.32.71.91.51.41.72.22.83.43.90.60.30.20.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.40.71.22.02.93.96.82.62.62.21.71.41.31.62.12.73.23.40.50.30.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.51.01.72.43.11.41.92.01.91.51.21.21.41.82.22.62.70.50.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.40.81.42.02.40.90.00.00.00.00.23.91.41.61.61.41.11.11.31.51.72.02.00.50.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.30.61.11.61.80.60.20.00.00.00.11.00.80.10.00.10.11.01.21.31.21.01.01.11.21.41.51.40.50.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.50.91.21.30.40.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.00.10.10.70.91.01.00.90.80.91.01.11.10.90.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.40.70.90.40.30.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.60.70.80.80.70.70.70.80.80.80.60.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.30.50.70.20.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.40.60.60.60.60.50.50.60.60.50.30.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.40.50.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.30.40.50.40.40.30.40.40.40.30.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.30.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.30.30.30.20.20.20.20.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01 fc1 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.25 fc0.25 fcBROOKLYN CENTER OFFICE FLEX PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAX City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkw y | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3300 | www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org Community Development 763-569-3300 November 12, 2021 6440 Ja mes Circle Building review comments for newly proposed Flex office building to be located at 6440 James Circle. 1. A SAC Demo determination letter and review by MET Council is required prior to a building Demolition permit being issued. 2. The building will be required to have a sprinkler system installed. City of Brooklyn Center zoning ordinance 3-101 B. (2) as adopted by the Minnesota State Building code 1306 Special Fire Protection system 1306.0020 Subp. 2, Existing and New buildings. 3. If there is no access from the outside of the building into the Sprinkler riser room. A Post PIV, Wall PIV or OS & Y valve shall be provided per City Fire Inspector. 4. Prior to a Building permit being issued. A SAC determination for the new building will need to be done by MET Council and SAC determination letter received. Sincerely, Da n Grinsteinner Building Official City of Brooklyn Center 763-569-3313 Exhibit E