HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-14-22 CCP
!"# $ %
&
'
&
%
( ) #)*#*)
*+,,
(
-- * .# #/$
(
*""**/
. #"##
! "#$%&
$&
%%
'
%
0
!1%
2
3
&
4
%
4 %
&
4
%
'
% %
%%
! 0
%
!
5
'
0
' '
!1%
2
'%
&
'
%
'
'
%%
!
'
'
0
4
4
%
4
%
'
4 '
4
%
4!6
%
%
!$
'
%
4
!
' (! )* +",
- ./0*1 11
0
!"#
%
!2
%
4
% %
!'
%%
'%
%
4
%
!$
4&
% &
7
'
!
%4
'
0 8
4
'
90 0
9%
!
! 0
:
% /
& 2.0
0 !
#
(
0..1
0.
'
0 0
!
%
'
0
;
&
&
'
'0
0
!
! %%&'
! %%&'
!
%%&
0
'
'1%
<
=1<>.,=$ 64
>
0 '
?4
0
'
0
@
#"##
!"
#
$ !"#%& '($)* +
,
%
-
,
.
/
!
$ :
1
'
:
#"-3+ &
:
*
* 0/12
3
!
%
64$
'
A
2
$
%&
$7
:!#" ,)" "# "
".
%&
,
4
5
)
6 3 /0(/05/5/7/'5
5
8
!
'!
%
?
0
%&
$7
:!#"##)" "# "
". 6
%&
)
%%&
%
%
BC% 0%
' %&
$7
:!
#"##)" "# "
". 6
%&
!
!
0
4D6
%% 6
0
8
,9+
+
8 :
, 21 132! 13/!0 13 1
! 01 ,%
,
4 25 !6 01
%
%
! '
'
0
4
4
%
4
4 '
4
%
4
!6
%
%
!$
'
%
4
!
7 2 0 11 1
8 ! 1 . 1
!
%
<
1
:!#"##)"
;
'2
0&
$ ?
0
#
"
3
//0
;
)* -
!
%
?4
0
0
0
$
-
,
)
!
A
'' %
% E #*.
$
2
#"#.
4 <75='5077
)
/'
!
<
$
$
$
'
0 '?4
0
:
*
-
,
53
! /
'
.9
We Agree To
Internal Council Relations – Norms for 2021 – Practiced for next 90 days
• Seek to not repeat or re-iterate points that were already shared
• Engage in discussion and sharing alternate perspectives without weaponizing other
people’s words
• Recognize others with “What I heard you say is _____, with your permission, I’d like to
move forward now.”
• Call for consensus when it’s time to make a discussion
• Allow new solutions in a time of dynamic change, process: (1) name the problem (2) find
the process to resolve (3) have the discussion (4) make a decision.
• After open discussion, close down the chat during council chamber discussion (*need to
vote on it).
!"
# $%# &
'( ' )*"
+
*$',
--. / !
0 1 ! * * 23"1 4 !/ 5 6 !5!) 5
--. )1 . )
&
&
&
!
- 6 7
""# $"
!-6 $- -
8* * !! 8
' +-
8 * !! 8
' +-
2/28/22 -1-
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
STUDY SESSION
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
VIA ZOOM
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session called to order by Mayor Mike Elliott at
6:03 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Mike Elliott and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence-
Anderson, and Dan Ryan were present. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards,
Community Development Director Meg Beekman, and City Clerk Barb Suciu.
CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF AGENDA ITEMS AND QUESTIONS
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she would like to have further discussion on Council
Consideration Item 10b. Resolution Establishing the Community Safety and Violence Prevention
Implementation Committee. She asked if they could move the item to the Work Session to allow
for more discussion.
Mayor Mike Elliott stated they have a presentation on item 10b. Resolution Establishing the
Community Safety and Violence Prevention Implementation Committee, and he would like for
the Council to take action on the item that evening. If the Council is not ready to proceed after
the presentation, then the item can be tabled. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she
was amenable to his suggestion.
Councilmember Ryan noted his agreement with Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson as he also
has several questions. There was a lot of interest in the Implementation Committee, and it would
be difficult to choose its members. He thanked Mayor Elliott for the suggestion to possibly table
the item, but he would like the item to move forward in a timely manner.
MISCELLANEOUS
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated a resident had indicated a change to minutes that have
already been submitted to the City Clerk for the regular meeting. The change was a minor detail
from Diane S. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson noted she received the request through email.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson explained the resident would like her comments regarding
diverse population to use the Community Center to specify she was referring to the community’s
senior population. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson added Diane S. would also like for her
2/28/22 -2-
comments to specify her desire for the Council to be thoughtful in the future use of the Heritage
Center.
Mayor Elliott agreed they could change the record to reflect the resident’s comments. He asked
City Clerk Barb Suciu if she had any comments on the change. Ms. Suciu stated she did not have
anything to add.
Mayor Elliott stated the May 10 event at the Heritage Center is not on the agenda, but they need
to decide if they want to move forward with the event. If they do not receive feedback from the
Council, the Event Committee may change the date or move the event to another location. He
asked Councilmembers for their opinions on the event and when the event could be discussed
further.
Councilmember Ryan noted he submitted several detailed questions to Staff regarding the event
that he has not received a response about. He stated the event would be good for the community,
but he has operational concerns. His support of the event depends on responses from Staff.
Mayor Elliott stated the next meeting is March 14, 2022. City Manager Edwards confirmed the
next Council meeting is March 14, 2022. Mayor Elliott asked for more feedback from the Council.
Councilmember Graves stated she has a couple of questions, but she would like to hear the answers
to Councilmember Ryan’s questions as well. Her questions were reflected in the minutes from the
previous meeting.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson noted her agreement with Councilmember Graves and
Councilmember Ryan. As a matter of policy, the Council needs to decide what types of events the
City would waive the fees for. They need to be careful from a revenue standpoint because it is an
enterprise fund.
Mayor Elliott stated Staff will return with answers to the Council’s questions for the March 14,
2022 meeting. He added the event planners may move the date or location of the event in the
interim.
Councilmember Ryan stated the Council should consider returning to in-person meetings while
taking into account guidance from the Center for Disease Control and the Department of Health.
Many other cities are returning to meet in person. As mentioned by the City Manager, there could
be health safety measures implemented for the meetings. He has heard concerns from community
members about connectivity issues with the online meetings. Also, having meetings in person
would improve credibility. He added he would like to hear the opinions of other Councilmembers.
Councilmember Graves agreed she would like for the meetings to be in-person again. The staff
has mentioned ways for the community to be part of the meeting digitally such as submitting
questions or watching the meeting. She added she would not be able to go past 10:00 p.m. for that
evening’s meeting.
2/28/22 -3-
Mayor Elliott stated staff will look at the timeline to return to holding meetings in person. He
noted there are benefits to both methods. As for the timing, he hopes they will complete the
meeting by 9:00 p.m. while still allowing for discussion and hearing from the public.
Councilmember Graves noted she suggested they discuss the American Rescue Plan Act funding
item that has been pushed back a few times. Mayor Elliott confirmed they would get to that item.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated they should address current mask policies and
COVID-19 updates. They may want to consider rescinding the current emergency mask mandate.
Mayor Elliott asked if Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson was asking for a presentation on
current COVID-19 conditions. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she would like a very
brief presentation, a synopsis for the public, and a discussion about removing the current mask
mandate.
DISCUSSION OF WORK SESSION AGENDA ITEMS AS TIME PERMITS
CONTINUE ALLOCATION OF AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUNDS
Dr. Edwards noted this would be the third presentation about the American Rescue Plan Act
(ARPA) funds. On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed the ARPA of 2021 into law. The
ARPA provides $1.9 trillion in additional relief to respond to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19).
The City of Brooklyn Center received a total allocation of $3,200,000 with half the funds received
earlier in 2021 and another half available to be requested in 2022.
Dr. Edwards stated similar to CARES Act funding, there were principles for the use of ARPA
Funding established. An inter-department group of Staff initially met to begin discussing the use
of funds, the process for allocation, and to develop a framework through which funding decisions
would be made. Principles intended to serve as a guide for the City expenditure of ARPA funding.
Dr. Edwards stated the guiding principles of the ARPA funds include serving a clear and direct
public purpose and benefit, taking measures that err on the side of improving the safety and the
health of staff and the public related to the COVID-19 Pandemic, bolstering long-term
communication capacity between the City and residents, promoting public health through
encouraging vaccines, COVID awareness in general, bolstering communications throughout the
City related to events, facilities, accessibility, and services, enhancing communication for various
emergency and safety campaigns, and recovering or providing reimbursement for operational
financial hardship.
Dr. Edwards explained they plan to maximize the use of funds to invest and increase capacity
within the community to recover and thrive beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. The first year would
use 60 percent of the funds for community investment and 40 percent for operational investment.
Then in the second year, 70 percent would be used for community investment, and the remaining
30 percent would be used for operational investment.
Dr. Edwards stated additional guiding principles of the ARPA funds include using funding in a
manner that provides long-term, multi-generational wealth-building and economic stability and
2/28/22 -4-
using funding in a manner that lowers the overall tax burden of residents. He noted any new
programs developed or funded with ARPA funds will have an identified sustainability plan for
how they will continue after the funding period is over. Dr. Edwards invited Community
Development Director Meg Beekman to continue the presentation.
Community Development Director Meg Beekman stated there has been extensive community
engagement to identify projects to focus on. In the summer of 2021, the City convened a group of
community stakeholders to develop a framework for a new direction for the City. As part of a
follow-up to this work, this group was reconvened over two meetings to provide input and
guidance on the use of ARPA funds.
Ms. Beekman explained during their initial sessions, this group of community stakeholders
identified four key areas that were critical to stabilizing the community and initiating real change.
These areas were around public safety and security, economic development, public health, and
community life resources. The four areas were carried forward into the ARPA funding discussions
as a way to identify priorities and ensure that the funds were being used most effectively.
Ms. Beekman noted a community group convened twice over two weeks. During their first
meeting, the community stakeholders learned about the ARPA funding program, the established
guiding principles, and the programs and projects that had been proposed previously. They
identified gaps in the program proposals and discussed key areas of focus. At their second meeting,
the community stakeholders worked together to come to a consensus on priorities for the use of
the funds and the programs to be funded. The input gathered from the work determined the funding
priorities included in the ARPA Funding Plan.
Ms. Beekman stated out of the community engagement process and through the work of
identifying program funding, several themes arose around which ARPA-funded initiatives
revolved. The funding focuses on programs that build capacity, center economic development,
youth, and build capacity.
Ms. Beekman explained the focus of building capacity is achieved through leveraging existing
assets in the community, strengthening partnerships, and investing in the community. As for
centering economic development and youth, a majority of the programs and initiatives that were
prioritized through the community engagement process involved a focus on multi-generational
wealth building and youth engagement. Additionally, the process to create the ARPA investment
plan was embedded in the community, and involved community-based visioning. The funding
intends to strengthen community partnerships and resources.
Ms. Beekman stated with the ARPA funds, one of the guiding principles was to utilize a great
proportion of the funds externally, and to build capacity within the community. The proposed
ARPA Investment Plan utilizes 75 percent of the funds externally and 25 percent of the funds on
internal projects and revenue recovery.
Ms. Beekman added, based on the program priorities identified by the community stakeholder
group, Staff has prepared a proposed ARPA Investment Plan. The investment plan includes a mix
of internal and external funding programs and allows flexibility in terms of what program year the
2/28/22 -5-
funds will be delivered in. The project will be moved forward based on the timing and availability
of the funds, and Staff will provide annual reports on the use of the funds and program
implementation.
Ms. Beekman showed a slide with a table depicting the programming for the ARPA funding plan
in order of priority. The highest priority is workforce development, and many of the components
are in partnership with Brooklyn Park. They would seek out sub-grants for community partner
organizations to deliver workforce development training, a Youth Entrepreneurship Program
through expansion of Brooklynk Services and programming, connecting higher barrier youth and
Black Indigenous Person of Color job seekers to jobs, and a Career Pathways Program focused on
adult, meaning those aged 24 and up, workforce development. Brooklyn Park has also committed
funds to workforce development efforts.
Ms. Beekman stated the next priority is regarding youth outreach and engagement. They would
contract with community partners to establish a Youth Outreach team, continue to work on Youth
on Boards and work on online and in-person youth outreach to enhance and expand youth and
family participation and engagement.
Ms. Beekman noted the next priority is a Commercial Property Development Fund, which is a
wealth-building strategy. The fund would establish a fund to support local small businesses with
the acquisition of bricks and mortar real estate. Funds will be used to provide equity to leverage
private lending and to provide gap financing for commercial development that supports small
businesses.
Ms. Beekman stated another priority is food access. They would like to use the funding to support
food distribution operations in the City and expand access through the creation of a mobile food
distribution program in partnership with CEAP and CAPI. It would be similar to Rec on the Go
but be Food on the Go.
Ms. Beekman noted an additional component of the ARPA funding plan is a Small Business
Resource Hub, which is a community-based space to support workforce development, co-working
space, innovation lab, and hub for small business technical support.
Ms. Beekman stated another program is the Humboldt Neighborhood Peace, Harmony, and
Prosperity Small Area Plan. For that program, the idea is to develop a community-led vision for
the future of the Humboldt Neighborhood that includes goals for housing, open space, street-
scaping, and business development and to identify short and longer-term implementation strategies
and support an initial investment in the neighborhood to catalyze the vision.
Ms. Beekman added Health on the Go is a program with some ARPA funding allocated which
would expand upon the partnerships created as part of the pilot Health on the Go program and
expand services to residents.
Ms. Beekman stated some of the funding could be used for central beautification and business
improvement districts. They hope to utilize funds to establish a central Business Improvement
District to enhance clean-up, snow removal, seasonal lights and greenery, and placemaking,
2/28/22 -6-
meaning programming to be designed in partnership with district businesses.
Ms. Beekman stated Public Art Matching Fund would be funding to cost-share public art initiatives
on private property. Lastly, they would like to create a Daunte Wright Memorial by
commissioning an artist.
Mayor Elliott stated they were going to move into open forum, so Ms. Beekman would have to
continue the presentation at a later time.
ADJOURN STUDY SESSION TO INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL
Hearing no objection, Mayor Elliott closed the Study Session at 6:47 p.m.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss. Certification of Minutes
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER)
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, certifies:
1. That the attached hereto is a full, true, and complete transcript of the minutes of a Study
Session of the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center held on February 28, 2022.
2. That said meeting was held pursuant to due call and notice thereof and was duly held at
Brooklyn Center City Hall.
3. That the City Council adopted said minutes at its March 14, 2022, Regular Session.
City Clerk Mayor
2/28/22 -1- DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
VIA ZOOM
1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor Mike
Elliott at 6:47 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Mike Elliott and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence-
Anderson, and Dan Ryan were present. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards,
Community Development Director Meg Beekman, Deputy Director of Building and Community
Standards Jesse Anderson, City Clerk Barb Suciu, and City Attorney Troy Gilchrist.
Mayor Mike Elliott opened the meeting for Informal Open Forum.
Roger C. stated there has been discussion about remodeling the Community Center. He explained
he goes to the Community Center to exercise from time to time, and he does not see the need for
any remodel. If the Council decides to remodel the Community Center, he asks for them to appeal
to the State to access their excessive funds.
Ebony asked how long it will take for the City to implement the no-knock warrant changes. She
explained it is unsettling for her and her family. She asked for the City to give something back to
the Wright family and the community as a whole. She asked if the Council will show progress in
2022 because they have been holding meetings for years without results.
Randy C. stated the Council’s role is to hear from the presenters but not to engage with them. He
stated he would not like the celebration to turn into a political event.
Lori B. stated the event at the Heritage Center sounds like an exciting opportunity for the
community without much pushback from the Council. As for the Implementation Committee, she
urged the Council to ask questions before moving forward with approving the Committee
appointments.
Lori B. added she emailed members of the Council regarding the City’s no-knock warrant policy.
She said she only received a response from Councilmember Ryan and thanked him for his
response. Brooklyn Center has had enough trauma, and they cannot afford to have another
incident. Lori B. urged the Council to push forward a policy prohibiting no-knock warrants.
2/28/22 -2- DRAFT
Brooklyn Center Police Department currently has the authority to carry out no-knock warrants,
and that is frightening. The City can create a moratorium on no-knock warrants. Organizations
are working on legislation to ban them completely, but a moratorium would be an easy temporary
fix for the unsafe policy.
Jeffrey D. stated he does business and organizing in the Brooklyn Center area. He urged the
Council to accept the proposed Implementation Committee appointments as that would be a sign
of action being taken. He added he would like the Council to ban no-knock warrants in Brooklyn
Center.
Mira A. stated her biggest concern is no-knock warrants. She explained she is a Brooklyn Center
resident with children. She would like to see no-knock warrants banned as they are detrimental
and unsafe for the community and police officers.
Joy stated the City has $3 million of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds that can be used
through 2024. She stated the Council doesn’t want to rush into decisions about an event in May.
Similarly, the Council should not rush any decisions about the use of the ARPA funds. There were
four priorities mentioned in the ARPA presentation, but those pillars were not reflected in the
programs presented.
Joy noted Staff claimed that there was extensive community engagement, but there were only two
meetings within two weeks. They have plenty of time to use the funds, and there should be more
community engagement to decide the use of the funds.
Joy stated she would like to see the elimination of no-knock warrants as that will make their
community safer. The Council needs to meet the needs of the community rather than the needs of
officers.
Joy asked if the ARPA funds could be used for the Community Center. As mentioned by another
resident, the Council could ask the State for dollars to fund the Community Center projects.
Joy noted there was a lot of partnership with Brooklyn Park mentioned in the presentation of the
ARPA funds. The Council should consider why they are funding programming in another city.
She asked why some ARPA funding was used for an HVAC system and door handles since Staff
went remote. She asked if there was a way for the public to look at an itemized list of the use of
the funds so far. She asked how the City is measuring the use of the funds to determine if they are
being successful.
Joy stated she hopes the Council will pass the appointments of the Implementation Committee.
She noted the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence
Prevention Resolution was passed almost a year ago, and she would like to see the initiatives move
forward. She added there seems to be a mindset of division, and that is not the intention of the
Resolution.
Mayor Elliott stated Staff will follow up on the spending of ARPA funds and what success looks
like.
2/28/22 -3- DRAFT
Jean L. noted he has similar concerns as Joy regarding the community engagement process for the
allocation of ARPA funds. He thanked City Manager Edwards and Community Development
Director Beekman for putting together the presentation. He stated he would like to hear more
about the community engagement process and transparency about who was engaged. He explained
he works with community members, and many members of the community don’t know what
ARPA funding even is. The Council needs to allocate the dollars in partnership with the
community. He added he would like to see a no-knock warrant ban in Brooklyn Center. The City
carried out two no-knock warrants last year, and it was two too many.
Jean L. thanked Council for their leadership in pushing for the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-
Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Resolution and funding it. He thanked those
who served on the interview panel for the Implementation Committee. He explained he would
like to see the initiative move forward to be an example for the rest of the State.
Mariah S. stated the City is advertising that it is a good City for small businesses, but she has run
into issues trying to run a small business in the City while living in the City. Some ordinances
need to be changed. For example, she is not allowed to park her commercial vehicle in her
driveway. She asked if there could be an option for a permit to keep a commercial vehicle in her
driveway. She added she supports the ban of no-knock warrants in the City.
Mayor Elliott stated the City needs to take action on no-knock warrants. He asked Staff to look
into Mariah’s comments about commercial vehicles being parked in residential driveways. The
City allows large vehicles such as RVs to park in driveways, which are regularly larger than
commercial vehicles.
Mayor Elliott moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the Informal Open Forum at
7:15 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
2. INVOCATION
Councilmember Ryan stated Russia has invaded the sovereign nation of Ukraine. He deplored the
unlawful act of aggression and the egregious loss of life that is likely to follow. He added his
concern for the violence occurring throughout the Country and their own community. He asked
for a prayer for peace around the world, region, State, and City.
3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session called to order by Mayor Mike Elliott
at 7:18 p.m.
4. ROLL CALL
2/28/22 -4- DRAFT
Mayor Mike Elliott and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence-
Anderson, and Dan Ryan were present. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards,
Community Development Director Meg Beekman, Deputy Director of Building and Community
Standards Jesse Anderson, City Clerk Barb Suciu, and City Attorney Jason Hill.
5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to approve the
Agenda and Consent Agenda, and the following consent items were approved:
6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. February 14, 2022 – Study Session
2. February 14, 2022 – Regular Session
3. February 14, 2022 – Work Session
6b. LICENSES
GARBAGE HAULER
Suburban Waste MN LLC 7125 126th Street West #500
Savage, MN 55378
HOSPITALITY ACCOMMODATIONS
Brooklyn Center Hotel Group LLC 6250 Earle Brown Drive
dba: Fairfield Inn & Suites Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
MECHANICAL
Alliance Heating & Cooling LLC 1603 Morgan Avenue North
Minneapolis, MN 55411
Appliance Connections Inc 12850 Chestnut Boulevard
Shakopee, MN 55379
DNA Heating & Cooling 950 Bayview Drive
Excelsior, MN 55331
RENTAL
INITIAL (TYPE IV – six-month license)
7018 Girard Avenue North Carmen Ganga
6718 Quail Avenue North Ikran Hassa
2/28/22 -5- DRAFT
INITIAL (TYPE III – one-year license)
7201 Riverdale Road Gavindra Persaud
INITIAL (TYPE II – two-year license)
1713 70th Avenue North Priscilla Tiffany Chen / Larkin Street
Housing
6813 Beard Avenue North Ethan Lucas Spaid/Beard Bros
Housing
5410 France Avenue North SFR Acquisitions 1 LLC / Pathlight
6937 France Avenue North Susan Obwaya
6436 June Avenue North Terry Williams / Spirit Properties
LLC
6601 Xerxes Place North Gary Schlotfeldt
RENEWAL (TYPE IV – six-month license)
2023 Brookview Drive Home SFR Borrower / Scott Beck
6207 Chowen Avenue North Doreen Kalema / Butterfly Bound
Care
5333 Dupont Avenue North Home SFR Borrower / Scott Beck
RENEWAL (TYPE III – one-year license)
1302 69th Avenue North Aeon Holdings / Carrington Drive
Carrington Drive Apartments Holdings
1001 65th Avenue North Messiah Moore/Bright Path Homes
5406 Sailor Lane James Waters
RENEWAL (TYPE II – two-year license)
3412 62nd Avenue North Neng Zhang
6336 Beard Avenue North Chen Zhoa / Cosco Property I LLC
6734 France Avenue North Alexander Lang
3816 France Place Segun Olatayo / Olejola Azum
6413 June Avenue North D Wahl / Cel Monton
2/28/22 -6- DRAFT
RENEWAL (TYPE I – three-year license)
4703 68th Avenue North Bernard McDonough
6701 Bryant Avenue North IH2 Property LLC / Invitation
Homes
5147 Drew Avenue North Frank Jin & Emily Zhoa
6800 France Avenue North Wilburt Brooks
6c. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-25; APPROVING 2022 FEE SCHEDULE
AMENDMENTS
6d. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-26; ACCEPTING STATE CONTRACT PRICING
AND AWARDING A CONTRACT, PROJECT NO. 2022-07, 2022 PARK
PLAYGROUND REPLACEMENTS
6e. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-27; DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND
ORDERING THE REMOVAL OF DEAD TREES AT CERTAIN
PROPERTIES IN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA
6f. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-28; DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND
ORDERING THE REMOVAL OF DISEASED TREES AT CERTAIN
PROPERTIES IN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA
Motion passed unanimously.
7. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
8a. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-29; APPROVING THE PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS
FOR THE 2022 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE OF A SUB-
RECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY
City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited Deputy Director of Community
Development Jesse Anderson.
Deputy Director of Community Development Jesse Anderson explained Staff is seeking allocation
of the 2022-2023 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. CDBG funds are
provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to help with
community development activities that benefit low and moderate-income persons. The funds are
primarily intended for brick and mortar improvements, as opposed to public service activities.
Hennepin County receives CDBG funds directly from HUD as part of a consolidated pool of funds,
which is administered on behalf of participating suburban Hennepin County communities.
2/28/22 -7- DRAFT
Brooklyn Center is considered a Direct Allocation City and is a sub-recipient of the funds through
Hennepin County.
Mr. Anderson explained the Federal Authorizing Statute for the CDBG program requires that each
funded CDBG activity meet one of three national objectives: benefiting low-income persons,
preventing or eliminating slums and blight, or meeting urgent community needs.
Mr. Anderson stated as part of the administration of the CDBG funds, Hennepin County adopts a
five-year funding plan, which further defines the priority needs of the program and clarifies what
activities are eligible for funding. Overall, the priority needs are around continuing what’s
working, while shifting the focus to preserving affordable housing and reducing disparities in
housing stability. Priorities include efforts to preserve and create rental opportunities, preserve
and create homeowner opportunities, create housing opportunities for homeless populations,
support education, outreach, and services, encourage neighborhood revitalization, and stimulate
economic development.
Mr. Anderson noted Staff has been advised by Hennepin County to use the estimate of $258,000,
based on last year's allocation to determine the allocation of funds. However, this allocation
amount could be adjusted once HUD provides final amounts. Hennepin County receives the lump
sum from HUD and determines the allocation among the participating cities based on a formula
that takes into account population and need.
Mr. Anderson stated there is currently $215,000 of funds available in the Down Payment
Assistance Program that was allocated in previous funding years. The staff has discussed the
timing of the funding with the County, and the only step to continue the program with existing
funds will be to sign an addendum to the current sub-recipient agreement in July.
Mr. Anderson stated staff recommends allocating the entire $258,000 towards the Home Rehab
Program due to the high number of applicants on the waiting list, which is currently 164. He noted
the County has increased its efficiency in receiving applications which should assist with the
waiting list issues. The Down Payment Assistance Program would continue to use the $215,000
remaining or consider funding with Tax Increment Financing District Three funds.
Mr. Anderson added there is a housing study underway. Through the study, it is possible areas of
need or other programs may be identified. At that time, Staff may bring forward a request for
reallocation of CDBG funding.
Mayor Elliott moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to open the Public Hearing.
Motion passed unanimously.
Randy C. thanked Staff for their work on the item.
Joy asked if the CDBG funds can be used to support their renter base. Mr. Anderson stated staff
has reviewed options for rental assistance with the CDBG funds, but there are numerous
restrictions.
2/28/22 -8- DRAFT
Joy stated she was hoping for supporting families in bad rental situations, similar to the tenant
protection ordinance. Mr. Anderson stated they have only seen the funds used for unit
improvements and not for distribution directly to tenants. He explained HomeLine has been
funded through CDBG, and the County allocates those funds.
Councilmember Ryan stated there is aid that is being distributed throughout the County for
purposes relevant to Joy’s comments. Throughout 2020 and 2021, the County distributed $62
million in emergency rental assistance. In 2022, they will distribute about $60 million for rental
assistance and additional funds through ARPA. He explained it is encouraging to see there is so
much rental assistance out there, though there have been problems with the timing of the
distribution.
Mayor Elliott moved and Councilmember Graves seconded to close the Public Hearing.
Motion passed unanimously.
Mayor Elliott moved and Councilmember Graves seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
29; approving the projected use of funds for the 2022 Urban Hennepin County Community
Development Block Grant program and authorizing signature of a sub-recipient agreement with
Hennepin County.
Motion passed unanimously.
9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS
10a. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12 OF THE CITY CODE OF
ORDINANCE REGARDING TENANT PROTECTIONS AND APPROVE A
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-30; TO ALLOW A SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF THE
ORDINANCE
Dr. Edwards introduced the item and invited Ms. Beekman to make the staff presentation.
Ms. Beekman noted the item has been presented to the Council several times. Based on feedback
from the Council and the Housing Commission, Staff has prepared a Resolution and Ordinance
which includes a 30-day pre-eviction notice and removes the 90-day notice of non-renewal without
just cause provision.
Ms. Beekman explained on November 8, 2021, the City Council met and approved the first
reading. She noted the original proposal is very similar to the current proposal. On December 13,
2021, the City Council met and held a public hearing on this item. After the public hearing and
Council discussion, the vote on the second reading of the ordinance was delayed until January 24,
2022.
2/28/22 -9- DRAFT
Ms. Beekman stated on January 6 and January 12 of 2022, staff held meetings with property
owners and managers to discuss the proposed Ordinance. On February 14, 2022, the City Council
met, discussed a revised version of the Ordinance, and requested additional feedback from the
Housing Commission.
Ms. Beekman noted the Housing Commission met on February 15, 2022. They heard comments
from property owners, renters, and tenant advocates. They agreed a tenant protection ordinance is
needed The Commission would prefer a 30-day pre-eviction notice but would consider the 14
days to be a good compromise. The Commission was split on whether or not to include the 90-
day non-renewal notice without just cause. Three Commissioners preferred to remove the 90-day
non-renewal without just cause, and two Commissioners preferred to keep it in the Ordinance.
Finally, the Housing Commission agreed that the property owners and property managers should
be required to document and report non-renewals.
Ms. Beekman added Staff received feedback from Minneapolis and St. Louis Park as they are the
only cities in the State that have such ordinances. Both cities have not received any complaints
regarding violations of the ordinance. Minneapolis stated that they had originally proposed 30
days based on feedback from their public hearing, but they lowered it to 14 days after receiving
feedback from property managers and owners. St. Louis Park originally proposed 10 or 14 days
for a pre-eviction notice, but after the property owners opposed the length, they lowered it to seven
days. Both cities have been unable to determine the effectiveness of the program due to the
eviction moratorium.
Ms. Beekman stated the proposed Ordinance includes a 30-day pre-eviction notice and establishes
requirements that prevent a property owner or property manager from nonrenewing an existing
tenant lease without just cause. Reasons for just cause include non-payment of rent, material
noncompliance, refusal to renew, occupancy by the property owner or family member, building
demolishing or conversion, rehabilitation or renovation, complying with a government order to
vacate, occupancy conditioned on employment. She noted the 90-day non-renewal notice without
just cause removed.
Councilmember Ryan stated Minnesota has the fifth-lowest eviction rate in the nation and has
fewer evictions than before the pandemic. There is not an eviction wave. He added he has been
checking in on the County’s eviction dashboard, which is a tool to search for evictions by zip code
and housing provider. The majority of evictions in the area are in public housing and nonprofit
housing facilities. He added they do not have much data on non-renewals. He asked if that was
true. Ms. Beekman confirmed there is not much data on non-renewals.
Councilmember Ryan stated he is concerned with the 30-day pre-eviction notice. That provision
puts the property owner or manager in a tough position. Typically, a person gets five or seven
days of notice if their rent is late. It is an attempt to begin negotiation between the property owner
and the tenant to work out the payment of rent. If the property manager hesitates for a day or two,
that launches the non-payment into another month. That was a concern shared by many property
owners.
2/28/22 -10- DRAFT
Councilmember Ryan added 60 days is the best practice for non-renewal notices. By removing
the option for a non-renewal notice period, it would take away a valuable tool from property
owners. Additionally, it makes it difficult for property owners to remove problematic tenants. All
in all, Councilmember Ryan stated he was not comfortable with the Ordinance as presented.
Mayor Elliott stated Minnesota is sixth in the country when it comes to education, but education
as for people of color, the State ranks the second-lowest. Oftentimes, the data shows Minnesota
is good at achieving outcomes for white community members. The sad reality is that a similar
notion applies to evictions as well. Many people in Brooklyn Center have suffered greatly due to
evictions and are in fear of what may happen without further protection. It is very important to
them for the City Council to pass the Ordinance to protect tenants in the community.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she is concerned about protecting tenants, but she is
also concerned about their effort to help, they may cause more issues. The just cause provision
has good intentions. However, if they are taking away the non-renewal option from property
owners, they may be unintentionally forcing housing providers to evict rather than go the route of
non-renewal.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson added there are issues of renters operating without a license.
There are many issues they can solve with the application process. Additionally, she has concerns
about litigation against the City for intervening with private property management. She thanked
staff and the Housing Commission for their efforts.
Councilmember Butler noted her appreciation of the work by staff and the Housing Commission.
They have tried their best to look for a compromise while serving the tenants. She added an
attorney has been part of the process, and she is not concerned about litigation. She stated she
fully supports the current version of the Ordinance and the tenants of Brooklyn Center who have
been negatively impacted by property owners.
Councilmember Graves stated the City needs to craft a policy that works for everyone, including
small-time property owners. She asked why the Housing Commission wanted to remove the 90-
day provision.
Ms. Beekman stated staff spoke with the City Attorney about crafting the Ordinance to address
some nuances such as different license types or number of units. They tried to keep the Ordinance
as simple as possible to be the most legally defensible. The Ordinance focuses on affordable units.
There is research that suggests tenants in affordable units are deeply impacted by the practices in
question. City Attorney Jason Hill noted his agreement with Ms. Beekman’s summary of the
reasoning for the way they wrote the Ordinance.
Ms. Beekman deferred to Mr. Anderson to respond to Councilmember Graves’ questions about
the Housing Commission remarks. Mr. Anderson stated the Housing Commission was split on the
90-day provision. Some believed 90 days was enough time to find alternative housing while others
did not believe 90 days was sufficient time.
Councilmember Graves stated she appreciated the 90-day non-renewal provision and was confused
2/28/22 -11- DRAFT
why the Housing Commission was opposed to it. She asked for more details about the impact of
including or removing the 90-day non-renewal provision.
Ms. Beekman stated the original Ordinance only had a just cause non-renewal provision. The staff
has received feedback from property owners that non-renewals are an important tool to use as an
alternative to evictions. Housing advocates believe that property owners should not be able to
non-renew a lease without a just cause. The 90-day non-renewal without just cause provision is
an attempt at a compromise between the two parties.
Councilmember Graves stated if the 90-day non-renewal provision is removed then there are no
protections. Ms. Beekman stated non-renewal with just cause has been in the Ordinance
consistently throughout the revision process. The 90-day non-renewal without just cause portion
was added as an alternative but has been removed for the most recent version.
Mayor Elliott noted there has been a concern with the 90-day non-renewal without just cause
provision has been considered a loophole for property owners by housing advocates.
Councilmember Ryan stated the 30-day pre-eviction notice creates a bad dynamic. It is a business
relationship, and the 30-day notice would destroy that relationship. Providing rental housing is a
for-profit undertaking. One property has lost over one-third of its income due to unpaid rent. He
noted there has been an issue with the distribution of rent relief funds.
Councilmember Ryan added non-renewals are used as an alternative to evictions and do not cause
a bad record for tenants. Additionally, non-renewals are needed to remove problem tenants that
are making a negative impact on other tenants. The City must uphold fair practices for the best
interest of the public.
Councilmember Ryan stated several tenants have spoken up about poor living conditions at a
particular apartment building. After hearing the comments, he reached out to the property manager
and heard their side of the story. He explained he is not trying to defend property owners, but
some housing advocates automatically assume property owners are in the wrong. He would like
to see all local laws fully enforced. The Ordinance is not fair to both parties, and it is the role of
the City to remain fair and impartial.
Mayor Elliott stated Staff has worked with tenants, housing advocates, and property owners. The
Council has the opportunity to pass the Ordinance to protect the tenant community. There are
similar protections for homeowners, and there are not enough protections for tenants. It is
important for the Council to pass the Ordinance that evening to support the many community
members who have asked for protection.
Councilmember Graves asked for more information about just case non-renewals in other cities.
Ms. Beekman stated St. Paul passed a just cause non-renewal along with about ten other
protections. The ordinance was challenged in court, and the judge restricted St. Paul from
enforcing the ordinance while the court was deciding. In response, St. Paul rescinded the
ordinance, and they are working on an alternative. However, the language is similar to other just
cause non-renewal ordinances in other states.
2/28/22 -12- DRAFT
Ms. Beekman stated the provision does allow for non-renewals. Councilmember Graves asked if
Brooklyn Center was using the same language that was challenged in St. Paul. Ms. Beekman
stated Brooklyn Center was using the same language that was challenged in St. Paul, but the St.
Paul ordinance in total included more than ten provisions and the entire ordinance was challenged.
Councilmember Graves asked if St. Louis Park and Minneapolis have just caused non-renewals in
their tenant protection ordinances. Ms. Beekman stated St. Louis Park and Minneapolis do not
have just causes non-renewals in their tenant protection ordinances. However, they have pre-
eviction notices in their ordinances, one for 14-days and one for seven days.
Councilmember Graves stated the issue at hand is complex. There are varying opinions from all
parties. They want the Ordinance to protect tenants, but they want to avoid unintended
consequences. She stated she is concerned about the just cause non-renewal provision as it hasn’t
been implemented in Minnesota before. Councilmember Graves asked if other cities or other states
have used a just cause non-renewal.
Ms. Beekman stated there have been other cities in other states that have implemented a just cause
non-renewal provision. One example is Seattle, but there are other cities. Councilmember Graves
asked if there are any loopholes. Ms. Beekman stated she is not aware of any loopholes in the
Seattle ordinance.
Councilmember Graves stated she is okay with the recommendation from Staff, but it is hard to
know if it is the right decision. She asked for clarification about the pre-eviction notice. Ms.
Beekman stated most property owners provide an eviction notice within a week of non-payment
of rent. The pre-eviction notice would require the property owner to provide notice before filing
any eviction paperwork. The notice would allow for time to address the payment of rent. She
added the eviction process takes about three weeks.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated the proposed Ordinance requires a 30-day pre-eviction
notice. She asked what most standard leases require for eviction notices. Ms. Beekman stated she
is not familiar with leases that have a time frame for eviction notices.
Ms. Beekman explained non-renewals is a termination of a contract, and either party can determine
they do not want to continue in the contract. An eviction filing takes place in court and requires
just cause to be proved in court. It is typically for nonpayment of rent. Simply filing the eviction
puts a mark on the tenant’s rental history. Even if the eviction is not upheld, the eviction filing is
still on their record. The purpose of the pre-eviction notice is to provide time for the tenant and
landlord to work out a payment plan or other resolution and hopefully avoid filing any eviction
paperwork.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she understands the difference between non-renewals
and evictions. If a housing provider chooses to not renew, they must give a reason. However, a
tenant does not have to give a reason if they choose to not renew. She explained she is worried
about removing the non-renewal tool and forcing the housing provider to evict the tenant.
2/28/22 -13- DRAFT
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson explained she won’t support the Ordinance while there is a
just cause non-renewal provision. The Ordinance is not going to solve most of the concerns shared
by residents, and there are too many potential unintended consequences. She thanked the staff for
their work on the Ordinance.
Mayor Elliott asked Ms. Beekman to speak to the potential unintended consequences of the
Ordinance. He added the housing professionals, such as advocates from HomeLINE, likely
wouldn’t support an Ordinance that would have a negative impact on tenants.
Ms. Beekman stated filing an eviction needs substantial reasoning to be proven in court. There is
a higher burden of proof in an eviction process in comparison to a non-renewal process. Non-
renewals do not go to court unless a renter were to take it upon themselves to sue a housing provider
for not having a just cause for a non-renewal. She noted she is not sure how the Ordinance would
have an impact on screening criteria or other unintended consequences.
Councilmember Graves stated she does not feel completely comfortable voting on the Ordinance.
She thanked all of the voices that have been part of the discussion and noted she hopes to level the
playing field for everyone. She explained she is on the fence about the just cause provision and
feels pressure to pass an Ordinance to protect renters.
Councilmember Graves noted the Council wants to protect tenants. Those opposed to the current
Ordinance are still supportive of renters. She added further compromises could be a 21-day pre-
eviction notice or to add the 90-day non-renewal without just cause.
Mayor Elliott stated the Council can take action and study the data that will be collected thanks to
the data provided in the Ordinance. In six months, they could reassess the Ordinance based on the
data. He noted there were 54 people on the call, many of which are hopeful for something to pass.
Councilmember Graves thanked Mayor Elliott for his response. She asked if the City will be able
to track evictions. Ms. Beekman stated the goal is to track data, but six months may not be enough
time to collect a solid amount of data.
Councilmember Graves asked if there was a tangible way to track just cause uses or how screenings
may change. Ms. Beekman agreed it would be somewhat difficult to gather certain pieces of
information such as how screenings may change. There is always an option for anecdotal data.
Ms. Beekman pointed out the Council can make changes to the Ordinance. If the Ordinance were
to return to Staff, they would need further direction.
Councilmember Graves asked Councilmember Ryan and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson if
they were supportive of the previous version of the Ordinance in comparison to the current one.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she was at both of the January meetings with the
housing providers and housing advocates. At those meetings, the housing providers compromised
by adding the option of a 90-day non-renewal without just cause. The housing providers preferred
the 14-day notice to the 30-day notice. Landlords, both large- and small-scale, were present at the
meetings.
2/28/22 -14- DRAFT
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson added with the passage of 30-day pre-eviction notice, if rent
is not received on the day it is due, all non-paying renters will receive a pre-eviction notice.
Tenants that receive government funds or their paychecks consistently after the due date will no
longer have the ability to have an alternative arrangement. The just cause non-renewal would not
allow landlords to choose who they rent to. The City should not intervene.
Councilmember Ryan stated the second version of the Ordinance was a compromise that was
supported by housing providers. He stated he is opposed to the 30-day pre-eviction notice, but he
would accept the 14-day pre-eviction notice and the 90-day non-renewal without just cause
provision. Additionally, that is something the housing providers would accept.
Councilmember Ryan noted there are a lot of tenant protections at the State level. If tenants
document their conditions, they can access a pro bono attorney through organizations such as
HomeLINE to counteract any retaliation.
Councilmember Ryan added many tenants have complained about housing conditions, particularly
in the October 2021 meeting. However, the property manager was unaware of the conditions of
the units. The City also needs to get caught up with property rental unit inspections to further
support tenants.
Mayor Elliott asked which housing advocates would be in support of the 14-day pre-eviction notice
and the 90-day non-renewal without just cause provisions. Councilmember Ryan clarified that he
said the housing providers would be in support of the 14-day pre-eviction notice and the 90-day
non-renewal without just cause provisions.
Mayor Elliott stated they are having the same discussion as the last meeting. Renters are the people
affected by the issue. As COVID-19 protections for renters decrease, they will see an increase in
evictions. The pre-eviction notice just gives people 30 days to correct whatever the issue is. They
are debating whether to give a notice of 14 days or 30 days before an eviction is filed. They are
talking about families who may have difficulty finding housing down the line if they have an
eviction on their record. Therefore, it is incredibly important to maintain the 30-day pre-eviction
period. Landlords keep asking for less notice time. He stated he would like to hear from
HomeLINE, ACER, and the renters impacted by the Ordinance.
Councilmember Graves stated she has also spoken with community members about the Ordinance.
She proposed doing a 30-day pre-eviction notice along with the option for the 90-day non-renewal
without just cause. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she would support that option.
Councilmember Ryan stated Councilmembers are failing to understand the gravity of the 30-day
pre-eviction notice. The implementation of a 30-day pre-eviction notice would compel landlords
to implement an eviction notice on the second of the month after only one day of non-payment of
rent. If people receive county checks consistently on the third of the month, they would be
negatively impacted by the 30-day pre-eviction notice. He explained he would only support an
Ordinance with a 14-day pre-eviction notice and a 90-day non-renewal without just cause.
2/28/22 -15- DRAFT
Mayor Elliott stated he would like to hear from the community. He asked if the Councilmembers
would be willing to hear from the public.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated they have heard public comment over several months,
and she has attended the public meetings. She added she would prefer the 14-day pre-eviction
notice because she understands the consequences as pointed out by Councilmember Ryan, but she
supports the 30-day pre-eviction notice as a compromise.
Mayor Elliott stated he would like to hear from the advocates from ACER and HomeLINE.
Councilmember Graves stated the advocates are not going to say something they have not already
said. If they do hear from the public, then the time should be limited. Mayor Elliott stated he
would limit comments to three minutes.
Fadumo M. stated the community in question is one of the most vulnerable communities in the
State. Since the eviction moratorium ended, they have seen five times the number of evictions,
and they expect to see more evictions as more protections are eliminated. Fadumo M. added
housing is not just about four walls. It impacts mental health and the entire community’s stability.
Samuel S. stated housing is incredibly important to people. They are talking about families and
children. Evictions have an impact on health, education, and the community. It takes around a
year to remove a family from a home they own because the community has decided family stability
is more important than banks. Minnesota is lower in evictions than other states, but the goal is to
have no evictions ultimately. Samuel S. added it is very difficult to prove retaliation. He explained
he supports the current version of the Ordinance.
Mayor Elliott stated he would like to hear from the members of the public that have their hands
raised. He added he would limit the comments to two minutes.
Alfreda D. stated she is disappointed in comments from the Council saying that they have gotten
the landlord’s side of the story, but they have not seen the living conditions in Georgetown Homes.
The tenants do not have power, and they are reaching out to the Council to be their voice. She
stated she has been advocating for herself and the living conditions for a while. She has even been
escorted out of meetings for standing up for her rights.
Alfreda D. stated Councilmembers who claim to be on the fence have also had their campaigns
supported by property owners. She asked if Councilmembers are supporting the community or
their campaign supporters. There is a clear conflict of interest at play.
Joy stated cash benefits are issued on the last day of the previous month. She added they have
been speaking on the topic for over an hour. They have already heard from the community multiple
times, and they have spoken on the issue at multiple meetings. She asked what the Council has to
lose by passing the Ordinance.
Lovetee P. stated she is speechless after hearing from the Council. She explained she is trying to
represent the tenants of Georgetown. She stated there are people affected by their lack of
protection. Children are being pulled out of school, and families do not have places to live. People
2/28/22 -16- DRAFT
have been put on month-to-month leases without reason. Councilmembers do not know what they
are going through. Women, children, and families are suffering.
Randy C. stated he is a resident and past property owner. He noted his agreement with Alfreda D.
Each speaker is speaking about their special interests. Councilmembers need to make a decision
not just based on the loudest voice, but what will work best for the community.
Randy C. asked if the Ordinance would require the tenant to give 90 days of notice despite what
might be in the lease agreement. If the Ordinance is going to override provisions in the lease, it
needs to go both ways. He added the Ordinance will cause rent and down payments to increase
because the landlords are going to have more work and more paperwork. Randy C. added zero
evictions are never going to happen, and the City shouldn’t make an Ordinance that overrides
private contracts.
Samuel S. stated tenants are not given any ability to provide input on leases. Most laws are in
place to protect the tenants since they don’t have the financial ability or power to negotiate the
leases.
Mayor Elliott asked if Councilmember Graves would be amenable to passing an Ordinance with a
distinction between small and large landlords. Councilmember Graves stated Staff has said
making a distinction like that would make the Ordinance too open to legal challenges.
Mayor Elliott asked Mr. Hill about the feasibility of such a distinction. Mr. Hill stated if they
make a distinction, they would need some data or findings to support the reasoning for the
distinction.
Mayor Elliott asked if Councilmember Graves was open to supporting the distinction, then he
would be open to asking Staff to look into that provision. Councilmember Graves stated she would
be open to a distinction in the Ordinance.
Mr. Hill stated he wasn’t involved in the first draft of the Ordinance. Ms. Beekman stated Staff
had discussed ways to make the Ordinance more nuanced. The purpose of the Ordinance is to
protect renters. There wasn’t a rational nexus for a tenant to be treated differently based on the
size of the landlord.
Mike Elliott stated Lovetee P. has been put on a month-to-month lease, and she doesn’t know why.
He asked how the 90-day notice would impact her situation. Ms. Beekman stated the non-renewal
with just cause would make her lease go on in perpetuity until Lovetee P. was to not renew her
lease or until the landlord was to find a just cause. If the 90-day non-renewal notice without just
cause would more or less turn her lease into a 90-day lease. The landlord could not renew the
lease without just cause, and Lovetee P. would have 90 days to find new housing.
Councilmember Graves asked if there was another Councilmember interested in doing the 90-day
non-renewal without just cause along with the 30-day pre-eviction notice, she would still be
comfortable moving forward with that combination. She stated she would like to go for a 21-day
pre-eviction notice, but the 30-day pre-eviction notice is a form of compromise.
2/28/22 -17- DRAFT
Mayor Elliott stated he believes they should remove the 90-day non-renewal without just cause
because it creates a loophole for landlords and puts people like Lovetee P. in a precarious situation.
Councilmember Graves stated Lovetee P. was in support of the 90-day non-renewal notice, and it
would give her more time than the month-to-month currently allows.
Mayor Elliott stated he has spoken directly with Lovetee P. She has said the 90-day provision was
problematic. Additionally, many tenants in Brooklyn Center have said the 90-day non-renewal
without just cause puts people in a precarious situation.
Lovetee P. stated she is in favor of a just cause non-renewal. 90 days is not enough time to find a
place to live. Additionally, people do not want to switch the schools their children are in if they
need to find new housing.
Mayor Elliott stated Staff needs to have findings before returning to the Council with a draft. He
stated he would like the current version of the Ordinance to be passed so the Council takes action.
From there, they can change the Ordinance as needed.
Mayor Elliott moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2022-30;
approving of the second reading of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12 of the City of Ordinances
regarding tenant protection and summary publication of the Ordinance.
Councilmember Ryan stated Georgetown told him that people were put on month-to-month rent
because of the inability to pay rent. He inquired with the County about rental assistance to help
those tenants. The rental housing provider has to protect their interests as well. The Federal and
State government have put forth dollars to support renters.
Councilmember Graves stated she is not happy with the Ordinance, but she is willing to move
forward with the vote. She explained there needs to be more nuanced, and they need the 90-day
non-renewal without just cause. Also, she believes a 21-day pre-eviction notice may be a better
fit. She added her opinion has nothing to do with her desire to be in elected office. Instead, she
wants to have a balanced approach. She added she looks forward to seeing the data.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she would like to see an update from staff. Properties
are operating without a license due to Code violations. The City needs to take responsibility for
the Ordinance and Code enforcement. The proposed Ordinance has several unintended
consequences.
Councilmember Ryan asked if they could withdraw the motion to pass the Ordinance and table the
discussion for a later meeting. The issue is complicated, and they have heard from numerous
parties. He stated he wants tenants to be protected, but they need a balanced approach because
they want good landlords to operate in the City. The City cannot solve the issue of the housing
shortage as it is a regional problem. The City is trying to protect its vulnerable citizens, and the
proposed Ordinance may have unintended consequences.
Mayor Elliott stated the Council needs to take action and look at the data down the line to make
2/28/22 -18- DRAFT
the necessary adjustments.
Councilmembers Lawrence-Anderson and Ryan voted against the same. Motion passed.
Mayor Elliott thanked the Council for their comments and noted they will continue to monitor the
situation.
10b. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-31; ESTABLISHING THE COMMUNITY SAFETY AND
VIOLENCE PREVENTION IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE
Mayor Elliott stated on May 15, 2021, the City Council adopted the Daunte Wright and Kobe
Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Act. He explained they were looking
for seven to ten members to serve on the Implementation Committee, but they decided on 11
members to utilize as many voices as possible. He invited David Zaffrann, Public Safety
Implementation Committee Manager, to continue the Staff Presentation.
Mr. Zaffrann stated the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence
Prevention Act required the City to create an Implementation Committee including residents from
the City and other local, state, and national experts in public health-oriented approaches to
community safety, to be chaired by the Mayor, and with members recommended by the Mayor
and confirmed by the City Council. This Committee will propose amendments, ordinances,
resolutions, policies, guidelines, or other recommendations for the review, adoption, or
implementation by City Council or City Staff, as appropriate, that would fully implement the will
and intent of the City Council as expressed in the Act.
Mr. Zaffrann explained applications to serve on the Implementation Committee were distributed
and accepted over several months. Twenty-eight applications were received, and twenty-four
people were subsequently interviewed by a panel.
Mr. Zaffrann stated the Mayor is recommending ten members to serve on the Committee along
with himself as the Chair. The recommended members are Lori Bardal, Julie Bourque, Joecelia
Dameida, Matthew Branch, Amity Dimock, Joylenna Garcia, John Solomon, Mark Viste, Kia
Welch, and Katie Wright. He noted the first meeting of the Committee is planned for Saturday,
March 5 depending on the outcome of the Council’s vote.
Councilmember Ryan stated the printed packet did not include appointees such as Lori Bardal and
Matthew Branch. Matthew Branch is an Executive Director of a youth organization.
Councilmember Ryan thanked all of the applicants for their interest.
Councilmember Ryan noted there was an absence of younger black men amongst the applicants.
He explained he was excited to see the application of John Solomon as he has outstanding
qualifications. Young black men are all over Brooklyn Center and are most likely to experience
negative encounters with law enforcement.
Councilmember Ryan stated he would have liked to see Will Dinga and Trahern Pollard as
members of the Implementation Committee. He stated that Will Dinga and Trahern Pollard have
2/28/22 -19- DRAFT
worked hard to quell any violence in the community during the height of the civil unrest.
Mayor Elliott asked Mr. Zaffrann to speak to Councilmember Ryan’s question. Mr. Zaffrann
stated that Will Dinga and Trahern Pollard did not interview. Mr. Pollard scheduled an interview
and did not attend. Mr. Dinga was not extended an invitation to interview due to a clerical error
on behalf of the Staff. Mr. Zaffrann stated Staff tried to make as representative of a group of
people as possible for the Implementation Committee.
Councilmember Ryan thanked Mr. Zaffrann for his answer. He stated he has received comments
from the community that they were suspicious of the recruitment and interview process. He hopes
the Committee will be a place for honest and open debate.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson noted she read all of the applications. She stated she is
familiar with most of the applicants, but there are some people the City would be remiss if they
were overlooked. Barb Jensen, for instance, has a vast knowledge and understanding of the City.
She has experience on the Multi-Cultural Advisory Council and with mediation.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson explained she would like a more diverse group of ideas and
for the Implementation Committee to include those who were on the frontlines of the civil unrest.
It is unfortunate Will Dinga and Trahern Pollard were not interviewed. Additionally, Pastor
McKinley Moore could be an asset to the Committee. She stated she would like more time to
process the recommendations.
Mayor Elliott stated the applicants were interviewed by the panel and were considered together.
Barb Jensen will be an important member of at least one of the sub-committees, which is where a
lot of the work will take place. Other folks mentioned by Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson
will also be engaged through sub-committees because the panel wanted to utilize as much of the
community knowledge as possible.
Councilmember Butler recommended for Councilmembers to meet with Mr. Zaffrann as only a
couple of members of the Council have met him. She added it is irresponsible to delay the vote.
She thought they would have the Committee before the end of 2021, but they didn’t have Staff in
place until January. The council could have met with Mr. Zaffrann sooner than the current
meeting. The Council usually trusts staff in other processes, so they should not delay the vote,
especially since they could have asked more questions before the meeting.
Councilmember Butler noted it was close to 10:00 p.m. As stated in a previous meeting, she is not
willing to go past 10:00 p.m. consistently. Councilmember Butler pointed out Councilmember
Graves also stated she would not be going past 10:00 p.m.
Councilmember Ryan stated it is disingenuous to blame the Council for how long the process has
taken. The wording of the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and
Violence Prevention Act puts Mayor Elliott in the driver’s seat. It is not unreasonable for the
Council to ask questions. Councilmember Ryan pointed out he has met with Mr. Zaffrann, and he
has another meeting with him tomorrow.
2/28/22 -20- DRAFT
Councilmember Butler stated she does not like the mischaracterization of what she said. She stated
she has no issue with people asking questions. She does have a problem with Council not
respecting the process and trusting Staff. It is interesting when Council chooses to question Staff
or not. Councilmember Butler added she did not mention who has or has not met with Mr.
Zaffrann.
Mayor Elliott moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2022-31;
establishing the Community Safety and Violence Prevention Implementation Committee and
appointing its members.
Councilmember Graves stated it was not an easy process. She asked who was on the interview
panel. She added she would have liked to see more community members who acted as boots on
the ground during the civil unrest. Therefore, she believes they are missing the mark of who is on
the Committee.
Councilmember Graves added Barb Jensen is a great pillar of the community who knows how to
leverage her powers as a white woman. Additionally, she would have liked some youth voices to
be a part of the Committee.
Mayor Elliott stated there is active recruitment of young people to be part of the work through the
sub-committees and workgroups. They aim to include all of the voices possible.
Councilmember Ryan stated he would be willing to move forward with the recommendations if
there are assurances that the other applicants will be engaged in the process, in particular Pastor
McKinley Moore.
Mayor Elliott stated he has not spoken with Mr. Zaffrann on that topic, but he stated he would like
to see those people engaged as well. Mr. Zaffrann noted he did not include sub-committees or the
community engagement efforts in the presentation to ensure the Committee is informed and a wide
circle of people is included.
Councilmember Ryan stated the problem is if the other applicants are involved in the decision-
making processes. They need the widest possible collection of well-informed opinions. They
need a process that welcomes diverse debates because that will produce the best recommendations.
Mayor Elliott stated there will be sub-committees, and their expertise will be utilized in crafting
decisions. Councilmember Ryan stated they may not have a vote if they are not heard. Mayor
Elliott stated he will guarantee they will be heard. Councilmember Ryan stated the best way to
maintain trust is to stay true to one’s word.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she is not opposed to any of the recommendations.
She asked if there is potential to add other names the Council has mentioned. They would be
remiss if they didn’t consider more people, such as Diane Sannes. Everyone that has applied
obviously has an interest.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she has met with Mr. Zaffrann and will continue to
2/28/22 -21- DRAFT
follow up with him for more information. The Implementation Committee is already at 11
members. She explained she would support the motion, but she would like to add more voting
members.
Mayor Elliott stated there are some issues about Committee size and logistics. He added Mr.
Zaffrann can speak to how impactful the sub-committees will be. For example, Barb Jensen’s
voice is incredibly important to her personally. However, they went through a process with the
Selection Committee. He wants her voice to be included significantly.
Motion passed unanimously.
City Clerk Barb Suciu asked Mayor Elliott if Pastor McKinley Moore was added to the
Implementation Committee. Mayor Elliott stated he was not added to the Implementation
Committee.
Mayor Elliott asked if items from the Economic Development Authority agenda are time-sensitive.
Ms. Beekman stated the items can be moved to a later meeting.
11. COUNCIL REPORT
12. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Elliott moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded adjournment of the City Council
meeting at 10:08 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss. Certification of Minutes
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER)
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, certifies:
1. Attached hereto is a full, true, and complete transcript of the minutes of a Regular Session
of the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center held on February 28, 2022.
2. That said meeting was held according to due call and notice thereof and was duly held at
Brooklyn Center City Hall.
3. That the City Council adopted said minutes at its March 14, 2022, Regular Session.
City Clerk Mayor
!"
# $%# &
'( )' " *
+
,$'-
**. /0 ! !
1 / 2! !! !* !!1 . ** /
! ! ! 12! !!* !1 !
/3 1 4 5 !/1
. !* 6. ! !"!257 ***
** 6!" * ** / !** !/ ! ! 5* 1
1 *
/1
/ !" !!55 ! 2 1 ** !!1 7 1
*
8 ! #!*
2 ,* 9
: ;- 5 !
&
'+
&;;
, 1 . '+# < !
2 52 !!, !
: '
'+
&;;
'/ !<52 # 6 =, . ! ;;# 5 .
,1,< &;; >;
"00
? @ 1'!
,@
* !A;
8 B
6 00
;C ,
@ 2&;;
;
C , . !>
C! '. ,
@ ;;9>
! " #
$
"
%
* 6 )
&& '&$
!*6 $* *
:
' +*
!D D
?
' +*
Page 2 of 2
b. Police Service Calls.
Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per
year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include
disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12-911, and events
categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including
homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, auto theft and arson.
Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the
victim and suspect are “Family or household members” as defined in the Domestic
Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (b) and where there is a
report of “Domestic Abuse” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes,
Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (a).
License
Category
Number of
Units
Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct
Service & Part I Crimes
(Calls Per Unit/Year)
No
Category
Impact
1-2 0-1
3-4 units 0-0.25
5 or more units 0-0.35
Decrease 1
Category
1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3
3-4 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1
5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50
Decrease 2
Categories
1-2 Greater than 3
3-4 units Greater than 1
5 or more units Greater than 0.50
Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria
License Category
(Based on Property
Code Only)
Number of Units Property Code Violations per
Inspected Unit
Type I – 3 Year 1-2 units 0-2
3+ units 0-0.75
Type II – 2 Year 1-2 units Greater than 2 but not more than 5
3+ units Greater than 0.75 but not more than 1.5
Type III – 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 5 but not more than 9
3+ units Greater than 1.5 but not more than 3
Type IV – 6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 9
3+ units Greater than 3
Si
n
g
l
e
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
N
e
w
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
H
o
l
d
i
n
g
s
L
l
c
12
Ty
p
e
I
V
T
y
p
e
I
V
Si
n
g
l
e
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
O
l
u
s
o
l
a
A
A
g
u
n
b
i
a
d
e
11
Ty
p
e
I
V
T
y
p
e
I
V
Si
n
g
l
e
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
J
a
n
v
i
e
r
N
g
o
y
&
E
m
e
l
i
e
N
g
o
y
5
Ty
p
e
I
I
T
y
p
e
I
Si
n
g
l
e
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
A
n
n
e
t
t
e
R
o
s
s
-
W
e
b
b
&
M
a
r
k
W
e
b
b
6
T
y
p
e
I
I
I
T
y
p
e
I
I
Si
n
g
l
e
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
O
l
u
b
u
n
m
i
A
g
u
n
b
i
a
d
e
4
Ty
p
e
I
I
T
y
p
e
I
Si
n
g
l
e
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
T
J
A
r
m
s
t
r
o
n
g
/
s
A
A
r
m
s
t
r
o
n
g
4
Ty
p
e
I
I
T
y
p
e
I
Mu
l
t
i
F
a
m
i
l
y
8
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
4
8
Un
i
t
s
Re
n
e
w
a
l
V
i
c
t
o
r
i
a
T
o
w
n
h
o
u
s
e
s
38
X
Q
L
W
V
LQ
V
S
H
F
W
H
G
FR
U
U
H
F
W
L
R
Q
V
S
H
U
XQ
L
W
.1
pe
r
u
n
i
t
5
v
a
l
i
d
c
a
l
l
s
8/
3
0
/
2
1
-
A
g
g
r
a
v
a
t
e
d
A
s
s
a
u
l
t
@
6
8
2
1
Gr
i
m
e
s
3
/
1
9
/
2
1
-
O
b
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
@
6
8
4
5
G
r
i
m
e
s
5/
7
/
2
1
-
D
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
/
D
a
m
a
g
e
/
V
a
n
d
a
l
i
s
m
o
f
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
@
6
7
6
3
G
r
i
m
e
s
7/
1
3
/
2
1
-
D
i
s
t
u
r
b
a
n
c
e
@
6
8
2
1
G
r
i
m
e
s
3/
1
1
/
2
1
-
D
i
s
t
u
r
b
a
n
c
e
@
6
8
2
1
G
r
i
m
e
s
Ty
p
e
I
V
Si
n
g
l
e
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
F
y
r
S
f
r
B
o
r
r
o
w
e
r
L
l
c
11
Ty
p
e
I
V
T
y
p
e
I
V
Si
n
g
l
e
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
N
i
m
o
O
s
m
a
n
A
h
m
e
d
3
Ty
p
e
I
I
T
y
p
e
I
Si
n
g
l
e
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
M
i
c
h
e
l
l
e
A
S
h
a
f
f
e
r
2
Ty
p
e
I
I
T
y
p
e
I
Si
n
g
l
e
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
S
h
u
x
i
n
g
S
u
n
&
M
a
n
y
i
n
g
S
u
n
0
Ty
p
e
I
T
y
p
e
I
Si
n
g
l
e
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
A
&
m
E
s
t
a
t
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
L
l
c
4
Ty
p
e
I
I
T
y
p
e
I
Si
n
g
l
e
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
P
e
t
e
r
H
o
e
b
e
n
&
M
a
r
i
a
H
o
e
b
e
n
5
Ty
p
e
I
I
T
y
p
e
I
Si
n
g
l
e
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
A
l
k
i
s
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
i
d
e
s
E
t
A
l
3
Ty
p
e
I
I
T
y
p
e
I
Si
n
g
l
e
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
R
l
r
R
e
a
l
E
s
t
a
t
e
L
l
c
2
Ty
p
e
I
T
y
p
e
I
Si
n
g
l
e
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
7
1
3
0
F
r
e
m
o
n
t
A
v
e
N
L
l
c
2
Ty
p
e
I
T
y
p
e
I
Si
n
g
l
e
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
C
r
y
s
t
a
l
V
e
n
t
u
r
e
s
L
l
c
0
Ty
p
e
I
T
y
p
e
I
7\
S
H
,
,
,
6
T
y
p
e
I
I
I
T
y
p
e
I
I
Si
n
g
l
e
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
C
e
l
M
o
n
t
o
n
L
l
c
5
Ty
p
e
I
I
T
y
p
e
I
Si
n
g
l
e
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
C
e
l
M
o
n
t
o
n
L
l
c
5
Ty
p
e
I
I
T
y
p
e
I
Si
n
g
l
e
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
S
a
i
n
t
p
a
u
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
L
l
c
3
Ty
p
e
I
I
T
y
p
e
I
r
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
s
O
n
l
y
(
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
L
i
c
e
ns
e
s
a
r
e
n
o
t
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
t
o
c
a
l
l
s
f
o
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
b
e
l
i
s
t
e
d
N
/
A
.
)
ed Ty
p
e
I
I
=
2
Y
e
a
r
T
y
p
e
I
I
I
=
1
Y
e
a
r
n
C
i
t
y
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
a
x
e
s
!"
# $%# &
'( )* "+ *#* ! !
,$'-
!.//0 1
2+ . $2 / . !3+$ 4
5 63789:! 4 1
2':
21
(
!"
# $
%&
#%
$
'
()((
1 1+$ 5 63/8 :!* 4 ;/ *8 "
1
1 $1 0 * . 2 1 1 ! < * !! !2
1! 8 * 0 ! 1 /8 :!* */ !2 2
= */ !1
< 1 * 1 !8 //0 8 0 21 * *8 ! / /.81
! 8!1 ! : .!2
1 . ! > 81 !
. .! 1 2
+
56?
' :
1 2
*/ 2 : !/ /1 ; !!! : .0. !1
: !! !0 1 /1 */ 8 .* 1 1 1 */ @!*
!1 !1A 8 */ ! 2 ***2 3
41!@/ ?1 23?
4.* !
1 */ @!8 ! /
+
5
?,&'(7(
1 5
789:!*/ ! 1 ! 81 !/ 0!! 0 B! 8B! !8 1 22
1
: 0 !*/ ! .2!1! 0 !;3C41!20 .* / 21
/ 8 1 21 : 1 ! 21 : 1
! 0 !1! !789:!*/ ! 1 ! 81 !/ 0!!! 0
B! 8B! !8 1 221
: 13 " ! "9 ! "1! 41 !
1 0 !*/ ! .2!1! 0 3
41!20 .* / 2 1 :
1! 0 !1! !789:!*/ ! 1 ! 81 !/ 0!!! 0
B! 8B! !8 1 221
1 0 !*/ ! .2!1! 0 3
4
1!20 .* / 2 11 ! 0 !1! !,1! 8/ !1 8 .1
*/ ! . 111 */ ! . 1! *
+
5
?# 5+(5D
- 1E
1 !
+
5
=?+&,$&
1
> 1 8 !2 * 1 1
1 !2 1 */ /
+
5
F?9%,
#$5
+++G=
++G ;H* : 3 4IG ;
H 3C
CF4IG6J
, /G
6 =;36=H2 ++4IG J
, /
G
J F;36 H2 ++4IG
FJJ
, /G
=
;3F=H2 ++4IG
JJ
, G
;3F H2 ++4IG
==F
1 G
==;H* : 3
==4IG
FJ;
H 3C=J 4IG=
.!
$.. !G
J=
* GC
5 G= 3 +++/!G= 4
$.. !
5 G= 3 +++/!G= 4
+ .0 ' ! 7 7 *
1
;/ 1 + .0 ?8 ! / * K 0 ! 1! :* !/ L
1 1 ! K 1 M8 !/.1!!/ L * 1 ?
! :/ 8 N1
1 0 8> .0 ?8 ! / 21 ;
, !7 :!
.N .7
*/
.N .*/ ! 1 * !/ L .N . 0 1
*/ @! : . ! 8 / G
=/ 10 1 8 ! 21 /!. 1
/ 2* !1 . !
*/ ! 1 * !/ L .N . 1 1 1 ! 0 * 1
!/ L .N .! 0 1 */ @! : . ! 8 / G = / 10 1 8 !
21 /!. 1 / 2* !1 . !
//! !21!/0!"!/ L .N .! 0 1 */ @! : . ! !
2 !
7 : ?789:!
.N ." !,1 / .! 1
.N "
.N 7 +!/ "
.N # 8 // "71 !
71 ! +$
5 6 /
.N "+,
.N 8!"
.N +!/
, ?789:!
.N ." !,1 / .! 1
.N "
.N 7 +!/ "
.N # 8 // "71 !
71 ! +$
5 6 /
.N "+,
.N 8!"
.N +!/
$.. ! 1 !
.N .7
1 .N .//. !2 1 ! $.. ! 1 1 0 1
!! ;/ K 221 ! //. !1 ! .0 //. ! *
O .0 21 E 1 0 1 ! .0
1 !?1
0 !1 , .N ./ *1 2 .0 ! /!!8 21
* 1 !1 N0 3=4 !1 20 1
*/ 1 0 1 2
.0 !
,
.N .*.0 5 1:3, !?F4IG
=0 8 !
:K/* 3, !?4IG
=0 8 !
! !!,/ !IG
=0 8 !
*:3, !?F4IG
=0 8 !
P
.N .! 1 0 *!8 * 1 .0 8 22
$.. ! ?789:!
.N ."71 !
71 ! +$ 5 6 /
.N G
=0 8 ! / 2 .N .G= / 10 8 ! / 2 1
1 0 + .1 ! .0 !"$. */ ! 1 0 1 2 .0 !21
0 1 0 !1 1 .N .1 1 K 9 /
.N ,?,
.N 1 K 21 ++/!.1 1 .N .1 ! K 1
M8 !/.
.N .1 1 1 ,?,
.N ?
!!,?
",?'",?IG
=/ 10 8 !
!!
9 /
.N IG
=/ 10 8 !
!!'9 /
.N IG
=/ 10 8 !
!!9 /
.N IG
=/ 10 8 !
P
.N . 1 0 *!8 * 1 .0 8 22
!!!+ *!
PP$&+ &7 7 ,5* 21! . !%21
1 $&+ &
/ : //! *0 ++ +++Q1 ! * . .
6 0 +++1 !1
!/ ./ 1 5 6
2
1 0 ! 8 1
H ! / 0!8 21
8
G=="F=C" ! 1 ; ! / ! 8 GCF"=
!
/ . ;
""# $"
!/. $/ /
!. J
!.5 <
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LABOR AGREEMENT FOR
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS (IUOE) LOCAL 49
(PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE) AND THE CITY OF BROOKLYN
CENTER FOR THE CALENDAR YEARS 2022
WHEREAS, Section 2.07 of the City Charter for the City of Brooklyn Center states
that the City Council is to fix the salary or wages of all officers and employees of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City has negotiated in good faith with IUOE Local 49 (Public
Works Maintenance) for a contract for the year 2022 as attached.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center approves the attached contract with IUOE Local 49 (Public Works Maintenance)
for the calendar year 2022; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that authorized wage and benefit adjustments not
to exceed the maximum contained herein shall become effective according to the schedule of the
contract which commenced January 1, 2022.
March 14, 2022 _________________________________
Date Mayor
ATTEST: ___________________________
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
!"
# $%# & '( "
(( ) *(
&+ , - "#!
((. !.* )!
.$&/
!0 123! - 2 ( 43!
5
67-) 3
- **
567-) 3! * 2- "/ ( !-(
- 4 ! 2 4!(( 4 0! -! ((
0
3) (2 5"
-
) (* 2* !) - ** "
- -! ") 8 !- (*! " * ' - !! . 9
!* 0 4 (0* * * ) - 0: 4 - !
2 (*! 44 !-- !) ; !- - (*! < (* ' --
!! !!4 00 !( *!
4 *!* 0 ! 3) (2 6"
- (*) ( ! 4-
) 0!
0 !! *! - . 9 < (* !* '- 2-
! !*!
4 *!* 0 ! 3) (2
"
- (*) ( ! 4-
) 0!- 0 !! *! - . 9 < (* '!( 2-
! !*!
4 *!* 0 ! 3) (2 "
- (*) ( ! 4-
) 0! . 9'' - 0 - * * - -! 2 (
-
4 *!* 0 ! (2 "
!( 4- ) 0!
4- =>! ! () 4(- ** - * ' - !! !(* - 0( 4
!* 0. 9 < (* ''- ! 2 !* ' - ( - 4! *)
- ( 0!-*- ** ?- ) ! !- ! 4 4- ** .- ! -
- - ** 2 (*
4 *!* 0 !(* (2 "
! 9!*' - * -! -
- = 2 () - ! !!- - !! !
4 *!* 0 !(* (2
"
- = ! () (* -
(*! !!0) 8 - !- - (*! - 2 () (! 0)
04@
6 !!! 4 ( 04 !- 2!
4 *!* 0 !(* / 7"
- (*! !!0) 8 - !-
- (*!
4 *!* 0 !(* /
"
! 9!*' - * -! - -
'! 92- ' - ) A ! ( () - (*! 2
- '
4 *!* 0 !(* / 5"
- (*! !- !!0) 0
. 9!*' - * -! - - ! ' - ) A ! ( () -
(*! . 9 B ) ( 4A ! ( 2- ) 8 (*! C
- 2 () 4(- **
/
"
A ! ( !* ! 0 - - ) !- 4*'* !! !!
- ) D8 !- - 0( 4*'*
/
5"
- (*! !*' *2A ! ( - ) - !--
*' *. 9!*' - * 2 *- ** - * ! -
- ) - !-*' *) - '
2 "
!* 0 !(* @
6 (! 0)
0 !!! 4- !-
- *' *2A ! ( @
6 (! 0)
0 !!! 40
* ' - !!
2 "
!* 0 ! - !-- 2 () 4(- )
(! 0)
04@6 !!! 4- ( 04 !- @
6 (! 0) 0 !
!! 4* ' - !!
- ** !*! ! ! ! ! 9- !2 2 ( ' -- **
- !!*' ! ) 9 * ! - () - ")!0 " 4 4-
- ! !2 ) - !*- **
2
"
; (* 0 4( - () - E' *
2 ( 2 *! - - "
( 0
!* 0 !(* 2
5"
- !-- 2 *' *- )
- ** 0 !2 ) 0. 9 !! ) - !* ' - !!
!* 0 !(* -"
- !- *' *- ) -
** 0 !2 ) 0
F4- !0! **) "! 9 *) ; 0 - ()
E'4 ** !9- ** F4- E'4 ** ! 2 -
(( ! - 2 (
& ! ; !"! 9 (( !-
*- ; !4-
F!* ! -
! -: -
2 - ! 2 () E'4 ** !
- !0( !4 - ** !@
" * !*! ( !!
!! !!4 2 ( 2 - !*!24 - " 4* "- !! 2
!* !! !! !- **
!
-
((F(
""# $"
!*0 $* *
1-! 7
) (
!0
!0G <
1/21/2022
1/21/2022
1/24/2022
1/24/2022
2/10/2022
2/10/2022
2/10/2022
2/10/2022
2/14/2022
2/14/2022
2/14/2022
2/22/2022
2/22/2022
3/4/2022
1
Member ___________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-______
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE ABATEMENT OF CONDITIONS CREATING A
PUBLIC NUISANCE PROPERTY EXISTING AT 1208 57TH AVENUE NORTH IN
THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
WHEREAS, the property located at 1208 57th Avenue North, legally described in the
attached Exhibit A, contains a single-family dwelling (the “Subject Property”) and is located in
the city of Brooklyn Center (the “City”) in the R1 – One Family Residence zoning district; and
WHEREAS, according to public records, the Subject Property is owned by James
Fuhrmann (the “Owner”); and
WHEREAS, to the best of the City’s knowledge, James Fuhrmann is the sole occupant of
the Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, City staff conducted physical inspections of the Subject Property on
November 8, 2021, November 15, 2021, November 22, 2021, November 30, 2021, December 3,
2021, December 14, 2021, December 22, 2021, January 7, 2022, January 12, 2022, January 18,
2022, February 1, 2022, February 14, 2022, February 28, 2022 and March 3, 2022; and
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2021, November 15, 2021 and November 22, 2021,
correction notices were posted at the Subject Property and were mailed to the Owner, notifying
the Owner of the violations of certain code provisions addressed herein, as well as the steps needed
to correct the conditions and associated deadlines; and
WHEREAS, during each of the aforementioned inspections, staff observed an
accumulation of refuse, rubbish and junk, including an overflowing garbage dumpster,
overflowing bins, junk furniture, full garbage bags, or other junk and debris in the front
yard/driveway of the Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, on December 22, 2021, an administrative citation was issued to the Owner
for the accumulation and storage of garbage and refuse on the Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, on January 28, 2022, the overflowing garbage dumpster was removed from
the Subject Property, but the accumulation and storage of garbage and refuse on the ground had
not been removed; and
WHEREAS, on February 1, 2022 and February 14, 2022, administrative citations were
issued to the Owner for the accumulation and storage of garbage and refuse on the Subject
Property; and
2
WHEREAS, on February 24, 2022, a final compliance notice was issued to the Owner, and
on February 28, 2022, a physical inspection of the Subject Property revealed that the accumulation
and storage of garbage and refuse had not been removed from the Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, a physical inspection was completed on March 3, 2022, and the garbage and
refuse remained on the Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, the City met and spoke with the Owner on a number of occasions to discuss
the condition of the Subject Property, issued administrative citations to the Owner, and
communicated to the Owner that if he failed to bring the Subject Property into compliance, the
City would institute additional enforcement action; and
WHEREAS, sections 7-102 and 7-105 of the Brooklyn Center City Code (the “Code”)
deem it unlawful to store or accumulate any refuse on private property, unless such accumulation
is in a container permitted, and the contents disposed of, under other provisions of the City Code;
and
WHEREAS, section 19-101 of the Code deems it a public nuisance to maintain or permit
a condition which unreasonably annoys, injures or endangers the safety, health, morals, comfort,
or repose of any number of members of the public; and
WHEREAS, section 19-103 of the Code deems it a public nuisance to permit or maintain
the accumulation of rubbish and junk on real property; and
WHEREAS, sections 12-301 through 12-306 of the Code impose certain requirements on
the maintenance of personal property and on the storage and disposal of rubbish and garbage; and
WHEREAS, the Owner has not corrected the aforementioned unlawful conditions at the
Subject Property and the City’s deadlines as provided in the letters have passed; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to sections 7-105, 19-105, and 12-1206 of the City Code, the City
Council may order the abatement of certain violations by the City on any premises; and
WHEREAS, the City mailed the Owner 10 days’ written notice indicating that at its
meeting on March 14, 2022, the City Council would consider a resolution deeming the Subject
Property a nuisance and ordering its abatement; and
WHEREAS, based on the information presented, the City Council has decided that the
condition of the Subject Property constitutes a public nuisance and violates local law and,
therefore, should be abated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The City Council adopts, as factual findings, all of the above-listed Recitals, and finds
violations of all code provisions listed herein.
3
2. The condition of the Subject Property constitutes a public nuisance in light of these
violations.
3. Pursuant to its authority under the City Code, City staff is authorized to take necessary
steps to conduct the abatement of the aforementioned violations and assess the costs
thereof against the Subject Property.
March 14, 2022
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
A-1
Exhibit A
Lot 4, Block 3, Bobendriers Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
!"
# $%# & !'"( )*+&!
,- & * !")"
.$,/
!( 0( +&) 12 '3 ) 2 "4205 2
)6 7!
89 "
" "4 ! . ".2 $(
4205 2 !
!"#$%#$ #" #&#'
(
)
)
*
+
!
/ "
8"'
4205 2 )6 7!
89 "
" .
+ 2 "41 0 %5 " ! 1!(1' 4 ! . ".2 "
$(4205 2 !.+ 2 "4' !! !!120 ' !( & !
: !( ; 0 2 1' 06
' 2 '.+ 2 "41' 06 205 2 ! !<8"==>"
=8
' 5 1 & (; 1; 0 2 !<8" 8
" =??=' 06 !
( ! 2! ( !< "
"
8?@
!20 80
* ' 21<@="
@?' A ' !(05 ! !22 1' ; 2
!! 1 ! !1' 06
7
7
!
B !0 (45 !2 !
""# $"
!0( $0 0
!( ?
5 2
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND AUTHORIZING
FINAL PAYMENT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2019-01, 02, 03 AND
04, INTERSTATE AREA STREET, STORM DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota, S.R. Weidema, Inc. of Maple Grove, Minnesota has completed the following
improvements in accordance with said contract:
Improvement Project Nos. 2019-01, 02, 03 and 04, Interstate Area Street, Storm
Drainage and Utility Improvements
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that
1. Final payment shall be made on Improvement Project Nos. 2019-01, 02,
03 and 04, Interstate Area Street, Storm Drainage and Utility
Improvements, taking the contractor’s receipt in full. The total amount to
be paid for said improvements under said contract shall be $9,492,468.86.
2. The estimated project costs and revenues are hereby amended as follows:
COSTS As Original Award As Final
Contract $ 9,667,269.33 $ 9,492,468.86
Lighting $ 33,945.00 $ 33,945.00
Contingency $ 290,800.00 $ 12,035.22
Subtotal Construction Cost $ 9,992,014.33 $ 9,538,449.08
Admin/Legal/Engr. $ 865,500.00 $ 782,849.44
Total Estimated Project Cost $10,857,514.33 $10,321,298.52
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
REVENUES As Original Award As Final
Street Assessment $ 1,123,389.00 $ 1,123,389.00
Storm Drainage Assessment $ 337,041.00 $ 337,041.00
Sanitary Sewer Utility $ 2,233,962.91 $ 2,048,537.03
Water Utility Fund $ 1,829,668.50 $ 1,823,813.80
Storm Drainage Utility Fund $ 1,890,198.55 $ 1,722,613.21
Street Light Utility $ 41,945.00 $ 36,998.11
Street Reconstruction Fund $ 3,224,633.37 $ 3,002,156.21
CenterPoint Energy $ 175,776.00 $ 153,576.00
MCES I&I Grant $ -0- $ 72,799.16
Miscellaneous (plan sales) $ 900.00 $ 375.00
Total Estimated Revenue $10,857,514.33 $10,321,298.52
March 14, 2022
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
!"
# $%# & !'"( )*+&!
,- & * !")"
.$,/
!( 0( ,
"1203 2 )4 5!
6 "
" "+ * . $(1203 2 !
6( 003 ' !( 0( ' ! !0!* * %#
!0'
0 ("71203 2 )4 5!
6 "
" "+ * .
$(1203 2 !
, !7' + * . $(1203 2 !")4 5!
6 "
" "
3 0 ' "
' * !! * *
!"
!
#$%&'(%'')*+,
) &
!(
20 8 "9
": 9
7' ;
<* ! 3 "' !* 78 ":"::
=> !!*2? *%#!0'
0 (
7
' !& " ! %#!0'
0 (' !' @0 " A02 0 A 7 !
' ! !0!* * 7' 04
' * 2 7 8 ":"::
=> ! ' '
* 2' !(2 *
( !" 2! (" ! 8>" " ! 2
8B"
B>":
=>" 00@2
90 ! ;! ? ' !(C
!! 3 !
* !<
-
../
.
5
0/1/2
5
1
3
D !0 (13 !2 !
4
!0( $0 0
!( :
3 2
)4 :
3 2
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING A CONTRACT,
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2022-01, 02, 03 AND 04, WOODBINE
AREA STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Project Nos.
2022-01, 02, 03 and 04, bids were received, opened and tabulated by the City Clerk and
Engineer on the 4th day of March, 2022. Said bids were as follows:
Bidder Total Base Bid
GMH Asphalt Corporation $4,183,882.67
Park Construction Company $4,192,318.09
WHEREAS, it appears that GMH Asphalt Corporation of Chaska, Minnesota is the lowest
responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter
into a contract with GMH Asphalt Corporation of Chaska, Minnesota in
the name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project Nos.
2022-01, 02, 03 and 04, according to the plans and specifications therefore
approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City
Engineer.
2. The estimated project costs and revenues are as follows:
Amended Amended
COSTS Estimate (11/8/21) per Low Bid
Contract $ 5,767,500.00 $ 4,183,882.67
Lighting $ 16,400.00 $ 16,400.00
Contingency $ 579,100.00 $ 420,100.00
Subtotal Construction Cost $ 6,363,000.00 $ 4,620,382.67
Admin/Legal/Engr. $ 637,000.00 $ 637,000.00
Total Estimated Project Cost $ 7,000,000.00 $ 5,257,382.67
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
Amended Amended
REVENUES Estimate (11/8/21) per Low Bid
Street Assessment $ 937,768.00 $ 937,768.00
Sanitary Sewer Utility $ 990,000.00 $ 604,809.86
Water Utility Fund $ 1,700,000.00 $ 1,546,464.70
Storm Drainage Utility Fund $ 850,000.00 $ 263,438.86
Street Light Utility $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00
Street Reconstruction Fund $ 2,302,232.00 $ 1,684,341.25
Municipal State Aid Fund $ 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00
Miscellaneous (plan sales) $ -0- $ 560.00
Total Estimated Revenue $ 7,000,000.00 $ 5,257,382.67
March 14, 2022
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
71
S
T
A
V
E
N
FRANCE AVE N
BRO
O
K
L
Y
N
B
L
V
D
GRIMES AVE N
KYLE AVE N
WO
O
D
B
I
N
E
L
N
N
NOBLE AVE N
70
T
H
A
V
E
N
EWING AVE N
LEE A
V
E
N
HALIFAX AVE N
JUNE AVE N
PERRY AVE N
INDIANAAVEN
MAJOR AVE N
7
1
S
T
A
V
E
N
73
R
D
A
V
E
N
W
I
N
G
A
R
D
P
L
N
O
B
L
E
C
T
N
WIN
G
A
R
D
LN
S
H
A
R
I
A
N
N
L
N
N
72
N
D
A
V
E
N
VI
O
L
E
T
A
V
E
N
PERR Y C T E
DREWAVEN
73
R
D
A
V
E
N
WO
O
D
B
I
N
E
L
N
70
T
H
A
V
E
N
72
N
D
A
V
E
N
72
N
D
A
V
E
N
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
A
r
e
a
Wo
o
d
b
i
n
e
A
r
e
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ü Fi
g
u
r
e
1
!"
# $%# &
'( ' )*"
+, -!!!
*$'.
*/
+0 !!!!!110 !/
--!! !
! 2/ ! 3 4 !5-*/
+0 !!!!!110 !/
--!! 3
6 !! /1!75--!! // 3 /!! /!
! +!/ 85- 7 !
0/)/1 7 ! - 5/!! /"! 2 !9! !! // /
&
&
&
!
1 7 :
""# $"
!17 $1 1
- ;
' +1
1
Barbara Suciu
From:D Mulla <mulla003@umn.edu>
Sent:Tuesday, February 8, 2022 10:34 AM
To:David Vlasin
Subject:Re: Care to swap back?
Caution:Thisemailoriginatedoutsideourorganization;pleaseusecaution.
HiDave:
Nicehearingfromyou.Yes,I'mwillingtohelprelieveyouasyourworkschedulerampsup.I'venotcheckedonmyterm
either.
WithCovid,mytravelschedulehasdroppedtonearlyzero,sothatfreesupquiteabitoftime.
Sincerely,
David
OnTue,Feb8,2022at9:54AMDavidVlasin<david.vlasin@rwmwd.org>wrote:
HiDavid,
CaretoswapbacktotheCommissionerforthenextterm?–Myworkscheduleisgoingtogetfairlybusywithacouple
projectsandweeklymeetingsgettingscheduledforThursdays.MeetingarestillbeingheldvirtuallyviaZoom
IneedtoreachouttotheCity,butIreceivedanemailfromKarenJaegertodayandsoundslikemytermpossibly
expiredin2021.
Letmeknowyourinterestplease,
Dave
DaveVlasin|WatershedProjectCoordinator
RamseyͲWashingtonMetroWatershedDistrict
2665NoelDrive|LittleCanada,MN|55117
OͲ651Ͳ792Ͳ7970|CͲ612Ͳ810Ͳ5885|www.rwmwd.org
ͲͲ
D.J.Mulla
ProfessorandW.E.LarsonChairforSoilandWaterResources
Dept.Soil,Water&Climate
UniversityofMinnesota
2
St.Paul,MN55108
612625Ͳ6721
https://www.swac.umn.edu/directory/faculty/davidͲmulla
!"
# $%# &
'( ' "
) *
+$',
-./$0
!
0 1 2
""# $"
!01 $0 0
0 0 3
4 ! 1
3/15/2022
1
COVID DISCUSSION
CouncilMeeting,3/14/2022
Todd Berg,FireChief
COVID -19 by County
2
COVIDͲ19CommunityLevelscanhelpcommunitiesandindividualsmakedecisionsbasedontheirlocalcontextandtheiruniqueneeds.
Withcurrenthighlevelsofvaccinationandhighlevelsofpopulationimmunityfrombothvaccinationandinfections,theriskofmedicallysignificantdisease,hospitalization,anddeathfromCOVIDͲ19isgreatlyreducedfor mostpeople.At thesametime,weknowthatsomepeopleandcommunities,suchasouroldestcitizens,peoplewhoareimmunocompromised,andpeoplewithdisabilities,areathigherriskforseriousillnessandfacechallengingdecisionsnavigatingaworldwithCOVIDͲ19.
KnowyourCOVIDͲ19communitylevelandtakeprecautionstoprotectyourselfandothers.
3/15/2022
2
COVID -19 Community Levels
3
COVIDͲ19CommunityLevelsareanewtooltohelpcommunitiesdecide
whatpreventionstepstotakebasedonthelatestdata.
Levelscanbelow,medium,orhighandaredeterminedbylookingat
hospitalbedsbeingused,hospitaladmissions,andthetotalnumberof
newCOVIDͲ19casesinanarea.
Layeredpreventionstrategies— likestayinguptodateonvaccines,
screeningtesting,ventilationandwearingmasks—canhelplimitsevere
diseaseandreducethepotentialforstrainonthehealthcaresystem.
COVID -19 Community Levels
4
Somecommunitysettingssuchasschoolsandcongregatesettingsmight
includeadditionallayersofprevention(e.g.,physicaldistancing,contact
tracing)basedoninformationanddataaboutthecharacteristicsofthat
setting.
Take precautionstoprotectyourselfandothersfromCOVIDͲ19basedon
theCOVIDͲ19CommunityLevelinyourarea.
3/15/2022
3
5
What prevention steps should you take
based on your COVID-19 community
level?
Low Medium High
•Stay uptodate withCOVIDͲ19
vaccines
•Gettested ifyouhavesymptoms
•Ifyouare athighriskforsevere
illness,talktoyourhealthcare
provideraboutwhetheryouneed
towearamaskandtakeother
precautions
•Stay uptodate withCOVIDͲ19
vaccines
•Gettested ifyouhavesymptoms
•Weara mask indoorsinpublic
•Stay uptodate withCOVIDͲ19
vaccines
•Gettested ifyouhavesymptoms
•Additionalprecautionsmaybe
neededforpeople athighriskfor
severeillness
Peoplemaychoosetomaskatanytime.Peoplewithsymptoms,apositivetest,orexposuretosomeone
withCOVIDͲ19shouldwearamask.
3/15/2022
4
COVID-19 By the Numbers
March10,2022
•Total Tests Completed:19,023,778
•Total PositiveCases:1,422,344increaseof530
•MinnesotansNoLongerinIsolation:1,405,731
•Currentlypositive:16,613
•MinnesotansWhoDied:12,280increaseof167fromLTC
•HennepinCountyPositiveCases:295,722increaseof96
•HennepinCountyDeaths:2,535increaseof3(1Ͳ70,2Ͳ90)
7
8
•BrooklynCenter:
9,827 cases and 82 deaths an increase of 23 cases and 0 deaths from BC
over the last week. BC represents 2.51% of the County population,
3.3% of the cases and 3.2% of the deaths due to COVID. *updated on
3/7*
3/15/2022
5
9
VaccineData
10
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2/15Ͳ2/28
3/15/2022
6
Questions?
11
We respectfullyrequestadiscussionamongstCouncilonourcurrentmask
mandatewhichissettoexpireonMarch26andtopickadatefor hybrid
Councilmeetingstotakeplaceinperson.
!"
# $%# &
'(
)$'*
!+ , - &
. / 0 $! 1
2 !34' ! 00
!"
# $
! " #
!,+ $, ,
!+
!+5 6
) -
' 7,
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION REPEALING EMERGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 2022-01
REQUIRING THE USE OF FACE COVERINGS IN PUBLIC BUILDINGS WITHIN
THE CITY
WHEREAS, on August 9, 2021, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota (“City”) adopted Emergency Ordinance No. 2021-01 requiring the use of face
coverings in public buildings within the City as a result of the spread of the Delta Variant of the
COVID-19 virus; and
WHEREAS, Emergency Ordinance No. 2021-01 provided that face coverings were
required within public buildings during times when Hennepin County is classified as being either
a substantial or high transmission area by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”);
and
WHEREAS, Emergency Ordinance No. 2021-01 was amended on August 16, 2021 and re-
enacted by the City Council on September 27, 2021, December 9, 2021, and January 24, 2022
(Emergency Ordinance No. 2022-01); and
WHEREAS, in addition to requiring face coverings only when Hennepin County is
classified as being either a substantial or high transmission area by the CDC, the current version
of the face covering requirements, set forth in Emergency Ordinance No. 2022-01 adopted on
January 24, 2022, expires (1) sixty-one (61) days after its effective date, (2) upon repeal of the
Emergency Ordinance by the City Council, or (3) the enactment of a statewide emergency order
by Governor Walz requiring face coverings in indoor areas; and
WHEREAS, the residents of the City have been hit hard by the pandemic, both from a
health perspective and financially, and the spread of the Delta and Omicron variants of the COVID-
19 virus created enhanced risks to public health and significant surges in the spread of the virus;
and
WHEREAS, although Hennepin County experienced a surge in COVID-19 cases and
hospitalizations due to the Omicron Variant, cases and hospitalizations have decreased
significantly, and in response to the downward trend in cases and hospitalizations and high
vaccination rates, the CDC no longer finds Hennepin County to be an area of high transmission,
and it currently defines Hennepin County as a low transmission area; and
WHEREAS, as a low transmission area, the CDC provides that wearing a mask is a
personal preference based on an individual’s personal level of risk; and
WHEREAS, the City has been conducting meetings by electronic means as authorized
under Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.021, and is working to transition back to in-person meetings
while exploring options to allow the public to continue to attend at least regular City Council
meetings electronically; and
WHEREAS, on March 14, 2022, the Mayor, as the presiding officer for the City, issued an
updated statement providing that the City shall return to in-person meetings as of 11:59 p.m. on
March 31, 2022; and
WHEREAS, due to the CDC’s identification of Hennepin County as a low COVID-19
transmission area, and the diminished public health risk, the City Council determines that it is in
the best interests of the City and its residents to end the face covering requirements as of 11:59
p.m. on March 14, 2022.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn
Center as follows:
1. Emergency Ordinance No. 2022-01 requiring face coverings in public buildings within
the City shall end and is repealed effective as of 11:59 p.m. on March 14, 2022.
2. The Mayor, City Manager, City staff, and City attorney are authorized and directed to
take any and all additional steps and actions necessary or convenient in order to
accomplish the intent of this Resolution.
March 14, 2022
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Presiding Officer Statement Directing the Return to In-Person Meetings
As Mayor and Presiding Officer in the City of Brooklyn Center, I find as follows:
a. On August 9, 2021, as a result of the dramatic increase in COVID-19 infections and the
determination by the CDC that Hennepin County was a high transmission rate area, I, as
the presiding officer, issued a statement under Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.021
directing that the meetings of the City Council, the Economic Development Authority, and
of all other City boards, committees, and commissions were to be conducted by telephone
or other electronic means.
b. The statement was based on findings that it was not practical or prudent, and that was not
feasible, to require any Councilmember or staff to be present in the meeting room during
the meetings and the public was prohibited from being in the meeting room.
c. The City and its residents have faced many challenges during the pandemic, but fortunately
the development and distribution of vaccines have resulted in a sharp decrease in serious
illness from COVID-19.
d. Additionally, in response to a significant downward trend in cases and hospitalizations and
high vaccination rates, the CDC no longer finds Hennepin County to be an area of high
transmission, and it currently defines Hennepin County as a low transmission area.
e. It is once again practical, prudent and feasible to allow Councilmembers and staff to return
to in-person meetings.
Based on the above findings, I hereby determine and state as follows:
1. Effective as of 11:59 p.m. on March 31, 2022, meetings of the City Council, Economic
Development Authority, and of all other City boards, committees, and commissions shall
return to in-person meetings.
2. The previous statement directing meetings to be conducted by electronic means is
rescinded effect as of 11:59 p.m. on March 31, 2022.
Dated this 14th day of March 2022.
__________________________________
Mike Elliott, Mayor
!"
# $%#
&! ' " ( ) * '
+, - . ! "/ '0* 1!
0$+-
!) *) +2
''
! / 0
1 3 ! "3 ) * ' 3 !. ) ' ! * ! ' 3
( !(3 ''
/3 ! (3 ! ! 3 ' 3 !(3 ! !! !!3 )(3
( /3 ! ! *. ' 4(! *!" . ! 1 !''
1 !" !1 56 3 *!3 ( 3 3 2 !
3 '' 3 ( . 2 !( !) 1 !' !3 ( 3
!1 ! 3 " 7" ' . ! 3 8 7& 3! 7(! * !
* !3*' ) ! ' (' ' ) ! 3*. 3 *!
3 * '' )!! '' ('3 ' 3 3 *. 1 !
'' *1
+ !2 . 1 . !
9 2 : 2
; ** )*
)
) (' 3 !* !
!*3 ! ! ' ' *3 !! ' 2 !!3 ' 2 !!
!3 3 < =( 1!!' (' 3 ' !
/3 !
(3 ! / 0 ) ' 3 * ( *)(3 ''
3! 3 3' )! ( 3 ' 2 !
!:! 1 )(3 ( 3 *)3 ! .3 ! ''>
/ 2!?& ! 1 ) @* !(3 (
/3 ! (3 ! ! 2 3 6 *(' (3 * ( *)92 3
@* ! ! 1 3 .
A 3 ! ''> / 2?& * ( *)"3 *) !* !
3 *. 1 3 * ! 3 *)3 / 2! )
''!!+33
*.3 > ''!! ! 2 3 *)* !
3!3 !. * !!3 3 ! 2 **@' ( ! *)3 *1
!* !( )1) !"''!* !( 3 " . ( !) ' 3 3 +2
''
3 !'* )3 . . *) 3!!
3 33 ! '' ' 3 !. *! B / 2?& *3 !
"! B / 2?&3! ' (! *' ) !"! * !3*' ) !"
' !3 ' 3 !( 3 3 ''(3 *! *3 (
*3 ! (3 ! "3 * *! 2 3 * (3 *)!
)' 3 * ( *) 3 * ( *) ! "3 *) !* !
1 3 ! 3 / 2! )
''!!3 * ( *) ! !*!
3 ! ***: ! ''' '. ! !2 1 ( . 23 *)(
3 ( . 2 1 3 !. *!)1 1 1
! "
#
$
3
''9' "9!1
'' ' " 1 *' "0 ( "0 "
0 .
''" * ) @
%%& '%#
!*) $* *
!)+2
' ! / 0 C
!); >
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING BROOKLYN CENTER COMMUNITY CENTER
MASTER PLAN STUDY
WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Community Center Master Plan (Master Plan)
will be a multi-phased planning document initiated in 2022, to vision the future of the Brooklyn
Center Community Center, and;
WHEREAS, a master plan is a big picture, values-driven plan crafted to guide
future development of the Brooklyn Center Community Center. Master plans are not intended to
provide specific details, and;
WHEREAS, the Community Center Master Plan is based on input from
community engagement focused on community priorities for the facility, as well as the physical
and geographic realities of the site, and;
WHEREAS, the Infrastructure Framework is not a final layout of the
community center, but rather a guide to inform the continued community engagement efforts, as
well as the study, design and engineering of the community center, and;
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center expects continued community
engagement, which will inform elements of the Brooklyn Center Community Center and help
refine technical details of the Facility, and;
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center affirms and commits to continued
public engagement around the Brooklyn Center Community Center, which will help refine and
guide the overall community center project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center as follows:
1. The Community Center Master Plan shall be used as the guiding yet flexible framework
in which to progress planning efforts of the Brooklyn Center Community Center.
2. The City and its partners shall continue engagement and refinement of all elements of the
future Brooklyn Center Community Center.
March 14, 2022 _____________________________
Date Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
ATTEST: _______________________________
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
!"
# $%# &
'( !"
)$'*
!+,- ) .)/ /0"
1 "2 ! 3
!, ,
!
"
#$
,"
"3 ! ' ! , 2 ! 3 4356
,
3/7 !08 + 6 !/ , 7 7!4
9:;85
, $) / 2 6, !",
7!) < ! 7 !/7
!=! + 6!6 ! !, /, + , / 2" !!!6 " ,
6 +6 ! > = 7
,
6'?
7 +60"
" ,, 6, 6 ! 7
, , 6 7 = = > !
) * ", , ! ,
22/ !" ! !" =! !! ! /@ - +!" ! . 7 /
7 !2 / 636 !
A,
)6 ! 2 7 =
", +2 !/ ,! 6 ! !7
!,! !"2!6, , 6 7 !! =,
" , !
6! !// 7 6/B ! #9
!! 2/ !" 2/
!"!2 =! !!!//"6 !, 6/ +!" 227 +7 + +7 !,
= =! 7 // !
, ! 6! 6 6! . , /=
7 2=! ,
6 C/ !2 !/! ,
9:;3 2
# / ! !!77 " !/ ,7 = 4/D2,!5,
9:;83 2
! %!
)2
)6 "!2 // !6, ! 63 ! =!, ;
/ 2 /6! .+ 2 = !!! , ! 66 !", / !!6 +"
7 / 6 2 ?, , ,, !! =6 = 2 , 6// !
= !! 7 ! 6,
C/ 636
) 7 /=//! = @
? 2 ! !, , ! 62/7 , ! 6 , ,6! . , /= ,
9:;83 2
'! < ; 2
22 +
/ = ,
! !4
2 22 +!E , ! 5E/2+ /=, ,, ,
7 !"
9: !! "'! 22 +!, ,,
7 !"6 + !" !!=" ! 7 !, 22 +67 !
2 ! 6 2/ !4 "7 !" 5
7 2=! 2 6/ + @ , !,/
C2- ! 66 !7 ! ! / ,, 22 7 ,7
= ,
9:;83 2
( ;1 F227 !2 F/ + 7 !2
( ;G F227 !2 F/ + 7 !2
$! 6 2 , /7 ! ; 2"2+; + ,= 2
! =
$! 6 2 , !7 C= 6 ! !
/ 2! 7 / 6 ,36 ! , 7 +@ !! =
/ 6, , + H 6 / !7
A,, 6 2 ? ! =!, " / 2 ! 22/ ! !? +6/!!=
! !66 !"! , ! =!, // ! ! 2 C
& '( !
:!22 6
",
7 /622! ? , ! 7 / 6 2 ?6
+6,
, !!6, ? ! / + ( )
*'&
+
& '&
&'" 62 , = !!66 > !!! 7 /, ,/
- +!!/ 6 6 ;/,! ?",! / ! 7 7 2 + !/7
/ , ! 636 !
, + ! !!!",! /622! ? , ! +@ 6? !,
+ ! =- 22 + + , , ! ! 53=
) 6 ) I
52 7 /2 I53=# ,I 5
22<6 ! !4 6
,! 5, ! 6 ! 6 , 36 !!!! ! +6
/+ ! ! , , 6 ! = ! 2! . +7
, @!2 + ", 22! ? , ! =, 36 / 2",
! =!, // !" , / 2! /B !, , = //! / 7!,
+@ /!, / 2//! ! !!! ? !66!
, ! 2 + ", 22! ? , ! ? , 2 ! !!/+ !
6, ! 6, 6 ! , / 2!= 6 , / , 62, ? 2 ,
6 /+ ! , 3 3
! ,!
' ! , / 2/+ ! +@ =, 22! ? , /"! ., !/ /
//! 3:7 !2 3 , 7 !2 / ! 2C6 C 6
/ 2! !J C= 2!6 , / 2 , 6 ! = 7
6, 22 2 / !!" , ,, ?6 +6 / 26 ! 7
, 2 ! ! ,,36 + +7 ! 77 , 6 6! !/ 2!,
' / ,!6!! , 7 , , 7 C!+ !! !, 22"
! , / !,/! 7 !+ 22
2 7 /2 ,2 B6, / 2! + +7 !,
/+- , ,, 22 2 / !!77 6!2+; +
,= , 2
' 22, / !! , 37 !2 / !2= 22"
77 22;= ! 7! , 6 ! ! , 22
/ !,/! ! !
< ! ",
7
)6 " ,, ! /7 662, . !6,
/ 2, ! 6 ! != 22+ ! , 7 !,+2 6!/ , 2
" ,7 K 2!6, !/ = ? ! !"2!6,
6 ! +- ,
/7 7 2 ? = 6 2/7 2 !
!2 / 6, 6 ! C /7 6!2 =! !! !
, 22 - +!/7 22! 7 !
A,, 36 !" 6, // ! !+- //+6, 6 ! C "
= / ,22, //! 3:7 !2 3 +- !GL/ 6,
6 ! C
L/ 6, 6 ! /B ! 7 7
, 63:7 !2 3 ! K , ,! /" ,2 !/+!6, 6
/ 2!+ +7 !
! ,!
, 3:7 !2 3 ! ! 2 / 6, 36 ! =
! 7 7 / " ! . 27 /B !6 = ! 7 = 6 !
/ 2+2
) .//! !/7 /,
, ! 6, 6 ! / 2
2/ 2 +, :7 !2 3 !6J C=7 +2 " B!2 !2 = 2
!2 62 += 2 !? = 7 + +7 !
,
7 !+2 0"
1 "2 ! 3 6 ! ,, 6 ,
//! 3:7 !2 3
22 2 !! , ,, / !! +6? 6! !" 7 ///!
/ 2! + 7 ! /+- , ! 66
% // !6, ! 636 !6 2 7 /2 ", ,
2 !" 2+; + ,=
!
,
22:2 " ! 2) =") 6 ") ") =
22" / +
C
""# $"
!/+ $/ /
3:7 !2 3 G
' ?/
!+ G
!+< K
/ ! + L
3 ! +
<ĞLJƌĞĂƐŽĨ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐ/ŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚƚŽ ǀŽůǀĞƚŚĞŝƚLJ
ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ>ŝĨĞĂŶĚZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ;ŝ͘Ğ͘ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĂŶĚĨŽŽĚͿ
ZW&ƵŶĚŝŶŐWƌŝŶĐŝƉůĞƐ
WŽƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJŽĨƐƉĞŶĚŝŶŐĂůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͍
dŽƚĂůůůŽĐĂ ϯ͕ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ
/ŶƚĞƌŶĂů ϵϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬ͘ϬϬй
džƚĞƌŶĂů Ϯ͕ϭϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϬ͘ϬϬй
'ĞŶĞƌĂů&ƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬ͗
WƵďůŝĐ^ĂĨĞƚLJ
WƵďůŝĐ,ĞĂůƚŚ
ŶŚĂŶĐĞ͕ŵŽĚŝĨLJĂŶĚͬŽƌŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶŚŝŐŚůĞǀĞůŽĨĐŝƚLJƐĞƌǀŝĐ
ŶLJŶĞǁƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚŽƌĨƵŶĚĞĚǁŝƚŚZWĨƵŶĚ
^ĐĂůĞŽƌĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞƉŝůŽƚĨŽƌƉƌŽŵŝƐŝŶŐĞLJŽŶĚKs//ŶŶŽ
ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
^ĞƌǀŝŶŐĂĐůĞĂƌĂŶĚĚŝƌĞĐƚƉƵďůŝĐƉƵƌƉŽƐĞĂŶĚďĞŶĞĨŝƚ
dĂŬĞŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐƚŚĂƚĞƌƌŽŶƚŚĞƐŝĚĞŽĨŝŵƉƌŽǀŝŶŐƚŚĞƐĂĨĞƚ
ƌĞĐŽŐŶŝƚŝŽŶŽĨǁŽƌŬĚƵƌŝŶŐKs/
ŽůƐƚĞƌŝŶŐ>ŽŶŐͲƚĞƌŵŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĂƉĂĐŝƚLJďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚ
ZĞĐŽǀĞƌŝŶŐŽƌƌĞŝŵďƵƌƐĞŵĞŶƚĨŽƌŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂůĨŝŶĂŶĐŝĂůŚĂ
>ĞǀĞƌĂŐĞĨƵŶĚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐƚŽĞŶŚĂŶĐĞŝŵƉ
DĂdžŝŵŝnjĞƵƐĞŽĨĨƵŶĚƐƚŽŝŶǀĞƐƚĂŶĚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJǁŝƚ
RzĞĂƌKŶĞͲϲϬйĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚĂŶĚϰϬ
RzĞĂƌdǁŽͲϲϬйĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚĂŶĚϰϬ
hƐĞĨƵŶĚŝŶŐŝŶĂŵĂŶŶĞƌƚŚĂƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐůŽŶŐͲƚĞƌŵ͕ŵƵůƚŝͲŐĞ
hƐĞĨƵŶĚŝŶŐŝŶĂŵĂŶŶĞƌƚŚĂƚůŽǁĞƌƐŽǀĞƌĂůůƚĂdžďƵƌĚĞŶŽĨ
hƐĞŽĨ&ƵŶĚƐ͗
ĐĞƐ;Ks/ZĞůĂƚĞĚZĞƐƉŽŶƐĞŽƌEĞǁtĂLJŽĨtŽƌŬŝŶŐͿ
ĚƐǁŝůůŚĂǀĞĂĐůĞĂƌůLJŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJƉůĂŶĨŽƌŚŽǁƚŚĞLJǁŝůůĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞĂĨ
ŽǀĂƚŝǀĞ/ŶŝƚŝĂƚŝǀĞƐƉƌŝŽƌƚŽĨƵŶĚŝŶŐŶĞǁŝŶŝƚŝĂƚŝǀĞƐ
LJͬŚĞĂůƚŚŽĨƐƚĂĨĨĂŶĚƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞKs/ͲϭϵWĂŶĚĞŵŝĐͲ^ƚĂĨĨƐĂĨĞƚLJ͕
ŚĞŝƚLJĂŶĚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ;ŝƚLJǁŝĚĞĂŶĚ ŵĞƌŐĞŶĐLJĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐͿ
ƌĚƐŚŝƉ
ƉĂĐƚƚŽƌŽŽŬůLJŶĞŶƚĞƌƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐĂŶĚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͘
ŚŝŶƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƚŽƌĞĐŽǀĞƌĂŶĚƚŚƌŝǀĞďĞLJŽŶĚƚŚĞKs/ͲϭϵWĂŶĚĞŵŝĐ
ϬйŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂůŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚ
ϬйŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂůŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚ
ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂůǁĞĂůƚŚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͕ŚĞĂůƚŚĂŶĚͬŽƌĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐƐƚĂďŝůŝƚLJ͘
ĨƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ
džƉůĂŝŶƐŚŽǁLJ
ƚĞƌĨƵŶĚŝŶŐƉĞƌŝŽĚŝƐŽǀĞƌ
ŚĞĂůƚŚ;ƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůŽƌŵĞŶƚĂůͿĂŶĚŵŽƌĂůĞĂŶĚ
džĂŵƉůĞƐ'ŝǀĞŶƵƌŝŶŐtĞď
DŝŶŝŵƵŵŝŶĐŽŵĞĨŽƌĨŽůŬƐƚŚĂƚ
tŽƌŬĨŽƌĐĞƚƌĂŝŶŝŶŐ
/ŵƉĂĐƚĞĚŝŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĞƐͲƚƌĂǀĞůĂŶĚ
ZĞŚĂďŝŶŐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĨŽƌŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕
sĞƌLJŐĞŶĞƌŽƵƐŽŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŝŶŐĐŚ
LJŽƵǁŝůůƐŚŽǁƚŚĞŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐŝĨŶŽƚĞdžƉůŝĐŝƚĞůLJŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚŝŶůŝƐƚ
ĂŶdƌĂŶƐĨĞƌĨƵŶĚƐƚŽ͗
ďŝŶĂƌ
ĐĂŶΖƚĨŝŶĚǁŽƌŬ͍
ƚŽƵƌŝƐŵ;ŶŽůŝŵŝƚƚŽĂŝĚƚŽƚŚŽƐĞĚŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƌƚŝŽŶĂƚĞůLJŝŵƉĂĐƚĞĚ͘Ϳ
ƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚŝĞƐƚŽŚŽƵƐĞŚŽŵĞůĞƐƐ͘
ŚŝůĚĐĂƌĞĂŶĚĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘
Ž
Ɛ
ƚ
;d
Ś
ƌ
Ž
Ƶ
Ő
Ś
Ϯ
Ϭ
Ϯ
ϰ
Ϳ
^Ƶ
ď
Ͳ
Ő
ƌ
Ă
Ŷ
ƚ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ž
Đ
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
Ƶ
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
Ɖ
Ă
ƌ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
Ž
ƌ
Ő
Ă
Ŷ
ŝ
nj
Ă
ŝ
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ž
Ě
Ğ
ů
ŝ
ǀ
Ğ
ƌ
ǁ
Ž
ƌ
Ŭ
Ĩ
Žƌ
Đ
Ğ
ĚĞ
ǀ
Ğ
ů
Ž
Ɖ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ƚ
ƌ
Ă
ŝ
Ŷ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ő
;
W
Ă
ƌ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
Ɛ
Ś
ŝ
Ɖ
ǁ
ŝ
ƚ
Ś
ƌ
Ž
Ž
Ŭ
ů
LJ
Ŷ
W
Ă
ƌ
Ŭ
Ϳ
zŽ
Ƶ
ƚ
Ś
Ŷ
ƚ
ƌ
Ğ
Ɖ
ƌ
Ğ
Ŷ
Ƶ
Ğ
ƌ
Ɛ
Ś
ŝ
Ɖ
W
ƌ
Ž
Ő
ƌ
Ă
ŵ
Ͳ
dž
Ɖ
Ă
Ŷ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ž
Ĩ
ƌ
Ž
Ž
Ŭ
ů
LJ
Ŷ
Ŭ
^
Ğ
ƌ
ǀ
ŝ
Đ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
ƉƌŽ
ŐƌĂ
ŵ
ŵ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ő;WĂ
ƌ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
Ś
Ɛ
ŝ
Ɖǁ
ŝ
ƚ
Ś
ƌ
Ž
Ž
Ŭ
ů
LJŶ
W
Ă
ƌ
Ŭ
Ϳ
Ž
Ŷ
Ŷ
Ğ
Đ
ƚ
Ś
ŝ
Ő
Ś
Ğ
ƌ
ď
Ă
ƌ
ƌ
ŝ
Ğ
ƌ
LJ
Ž
Ƶ
ƚ
Ś
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
ů
Ă
Đ
Ŭ
/
Ŷ
Ě
ŝ
Ő
Ğ
Ŷ
Ž
Ƶ
Ɛ
W
Ğ
ƌ
Ɛ
Ž
Ŷ
Ž
Ĩ
Ž
ů
Žƌ
;
/
W
K
Ϳ
ũŽď
Ɛ
Ğ
Ğ
Ŭ
Ğ
ƌ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ž
ũŽď
Ɛ
Ă
ƌ
Ğ
Ğ
ƌ
W
Ă
ƚ
Ś
ǁ
Ă
LJ
Ɛ
W
ƌ
Ž
Ő
ƌ
Ă
ŵ
Ͳ
&
Ž
Đ
Ƶ
Ɛ
Ğ
Ě
Ž
Ŷ
Ě
Ƶ
ů
ƚ
;
Ϯ
ϰ
н
Ϳ
ǁ
Ž
ƌ
Ŭ
Ĩ
Ž
ƌ
Đ
Ğ
ĚĞ
ǀ
Ğ
ů
Ž
ƉŵĞ
Ŷ
ƚ
;WĂ
ƌ
ƚ
Ŷ
Ğ
ƌ
Ś
Ɛ
ŝ
Ɖǁ
ŝ
ƚ
Ś
ƌ
Ž
Ž
Ŭ
ů
LJŶ
W
Ă
ƌ
Ŭ
Ϳ
Ž
Ŷ
ƚ
ƌ
Ă
Đ
ƚ
ǁ
ŝ
ƚ
Ś
Đ
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
Ƶ
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
Ɖ
Ă
ƌ
ƚ
Ŷ
Ğ
ƌ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ž
Ğ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ă
ď
ů
ŝ
Ɛ
Ś
Ă
z
Ž
Ƶ
ƚ
Ś
K
Ƶ
ƚ
ƌ
Ğ
Ă
Đ
Ś
ƚĞ
Ă
ŵ
zŽ
Ƶ
ƚ
Ś
Ž
Ŷ
Ž
Ă
ƌ
Ě
Ɛ
KŶ
ů
ŝ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
ŝ
Ŷ
Ͳ
Ɖ
Ğ
ƌ
Ɛ
Ž
Ŷ
LJ
Ž
Ƶ
ƚ
Ś
Ž
Ƶ
ƚ
ƌ
Ğ
Ă
Đ
Ś
ƚ
Ž
Ğ
Ŷ
Ś
Ă
Ŷ
Đ
Ğ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ğ
dž
Ɖ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
LJ
Ž
Ƶ
ƚ
Ś
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
ĨĂ
ŵ
ŝ
ů
LJ
Ɖ
Ă
ƌ
ƚ
ŝ
Đ
ŝ
Ɖ
Ă
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ğ
Ŷ
Ő
Ă
Ő
Ğ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
Ğ
ƌ
Đ
ŝ
Ă
ů
W
ƌ
Ž
Ɖ
Ğ
ƌ
ƚ
LJ
Ğ
ǀ
Ğ
ů
Ž
Ɖ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
&Ƶ
Ŷ
Ě
Đ
Ž
Ŷ
Ž
ŵ
ŝ
Đ
Ğ
ǀ
Ğ
ů
Ž
Ɖ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
;
Ƶ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
Đ
Ž
Ŷ
Ž
ŵ
ŝ
Đ
^
ƚ
Ă
ď
ŝ
ů
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
Ϳ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ă
ď
ů
ŝ
Ɛ
Ś
Ă
Ĩ
Ƶ
Ŷ
Ě
ƚ
Ž
Ɛ
Ƶ
Ɖ
Ɖ
Ž
ƌ
ƚ
ů
Ž
Đ
Ă
ů
Ɛ
ŵ
Ă
ů
ů
ď
Ƶ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
Ğ
Ɛ
ǁ
ŝ
ƚ
Ś
ƚ
Ś
Ğ
Ă
Đ
Ƌ
Ƶŝ
Ɛ
ŝ
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ž
Ĩ
ďƌ
ŝ
Đ
Ŭ
Ɛ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
ŵ
Ž
ƌ
ƚ
Ă
ƌ
ƌ
Ğ
Ă
ů
Ğ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ă
ƚ
Ğ
͘
&
Ƶ
Ŷ
Ě
Ɛ
ǁ
ŝ
ů
ů
ď
Ğ
Ƶ
Ɛ
Ğ
Ě
ƚ
Ž
Ɖ
ƌ
Ž
ǀ
ŝ
Ě
Ğ
Ğ
Ƌ
Ƶŝ
ƚ
LJ
ƚ
Ž
ůĞ
ǀ
Ğ
ƌ
Ă
Ő
Ğ
Ɖ
ƌ
ŝ
ǀ
Ă
ƚ
Ğ
ů
Ğ
Ŷ
Ě
ŝ
Ŷ
Ő
͕
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
ƚ
Ž
Ɖ
ƌ
Ž
ǀ
ŝ
Ě
Ğ
Ő
Ă
Ɖ
Ĩ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ă
Ŷ
Đ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ő
Ĩ
Ž
ƌ
Đ
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
Ğƌ
Đ
ŝ
Ă
ů
ĚĞ
ǀ
Ğ
ů
Ž
Ɖ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ƚ
Ś
Ă
ƚ
Ɛ
Ƶ
Ɖ
Ɖ
Ž
ƌ
ƚ
Ɛ
Ɛ
ŵ
Ă
ů
ů
ď
Ƶ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
Ğ
Ɛ
͘
Ψ
ϳ
Ϭ
Ϭ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
&Ž
Ž
Ě
Đ
Đ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
Ƶ
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
>
ŝ
Ĩ
Ğ
Z
Ğ
Ɛ
Ž
Ƶ
ƌ
Đ
Ğ
Ɛ
&Ƶ
Ŷ
Ě
ŝ
Ŷ
Ő
ƚ
Ž
Ɛ
Ƶ
Ɖ
Ɖ
Ž
ƌ
ƚ
Ĩ
Ž
Ž
Ě
Ě
ŝ
Ɛ
ƚ
ƌ
ŝ
ď
Ƶ
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ž
Ɖ
Ğ
ƌ
Ă
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ś
Ğ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ğ
dž
Ɖ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
ĂĐ
Đ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ś
ƌ
Ž
Ƶ
Ő
Ś
ƚ
Ś
Ğ
Đ
ƌ
Ğ
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ž
Ĩ
Ă
ŵ
Ž
ď
ŝ
ů
Ğ
Ĩ
Ž
Ž
Ě
Ě
ŝ
Ɛ
ƚ
ƌ
ŝ
ď
Ƶ
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ɖ
ƌ
Ž
Ő
ƌ
Ă
ŵ
ŝ
Ŷ
ƉĂƌ
ƚ
Ŷ
Ğ
ƌ
Ɛ
Ś
ŝ
Ɖǁ
ŝ
ƚ
Ś
W
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
W
/
Ψ
ϭ
Ϯ
ϱ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
^ŵ
Ă
ů
ů
Ƶ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
Z
Ğ
Ɛ
Ž
Ƶ
ƌ
Đ
Ğ
,
Ƶ
ď
Đ
Ž
Ŷ
Ž
ŵ
ŝ
Đ
Ğ
ǀ
Ğ
ů
Ž
Ɖ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
;
Ƶ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
Đ
Ž
Ŷ
Ž
ŵ
ŝ
Đ
^
ƚ
Ă
ď
ŝ
ů
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
Ϳ
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
Ƶ
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
Ͳ
ď
Ă
Ɛ
Ğ
Ě
Ɛ
Ɖ
Ă
Đ
Ğ
ƚ
Ž
Ɛ
Ƶ
Ɖ
Ɖ
Ž
ƌ
ƚ
ǁ
Ž
ƌ
Ŭ
Ĩ
Ž
ƌ
Đ
Ğ
Ě
Ğ
ǀ
Ğ
ů
Ž
Ɖ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
͕
Đ
Ž
Ͳ
ǁ
Ž
ƌ
Ŭ
ŝŶ
Ő
ƐƉ
Ă
Đ
Ğ
͕
ŝ
Ŷ
Ŷ
Ž
ǀ
Ă
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
ů
Ă
ď
͕
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ś
Ƶ
ď
Ĩ
Ž
ƌ
Ɛ
ŵ
Ă
ů
ů
ď
Ƶ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ğ
Đ
Ś
Ŷ
ŝ
Đ
Ă
ů
Ɛ
Ƶ
Ɖ
ƉŽ
ƌ
ƚ
Ψ
Ϯ
ϱ
Ϭ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
,Ƶ
ŵ
ď
Ž
ů
Ě
ƚ
E
Ğ
ŝ
Ő
Ś
ď
Ž
ƌ
Ś
Ž
Ž
Ě
W
Ğ
Ă
Đ
Ğ
͕
,Ă
ƌ
ŵ
Ž
Ŷ
LJ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
W
ƌ
Ž
Ɛ
Ɖ
Ğ
ƌ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
^
ŵ
Ă
ů
ů
ƌ
Ğ
Ă
W
ů
Ă
Ŷ
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
Ƶ
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
>
ŝ
Ĩ
Ğ
Z
Ğ
Ɛ
Ž
Ƶ
ƌ
Đ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ğ
ǀ
Ğ
ů
Ž
Ɖ
Ă
Đ
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
Ƶ
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
Ͳ
ů
Ğ
Ě
ǀ
ŝ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ĩ
Ž
ƌ
ƚ
Ś
Ğ
Ĩ
Ƶ
ƚ
Ƶ
ƌ
Ğ
Ž
Ĩ
ƚ
Ś
Ğ
,
Ƶ
ŵ
ď
Ž
ů
Ě
ƚ
EĞ
ŝ
Ő
Ś
ď
Ž
ƌ
Ś
Ž
Ž
Ě
ƚ
Ś
Ă
ƚ
ŝ
Ŷ
Đ
ů
Ƶ
Ě
Ğ
Ɛ
Ő
Ž
Ă
ů
Ɛ
Ĩ
Ž
ƌ
Ś
Ž
Ƶ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ő
͕
Ž
Ɖ
Ğ
Ŷ
Ɛ
Ɖ
Ă
Đ
Ğ
͕
Ɛ
ƚ
ƌ
Ğ
Ğ
ƚƐ
Đ
Ă
Ɖ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ő
ĂŶ
Ě
ď
Ƶ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
Ě
Ğ
ǀ
Ğ
ů
Ž
Ɖ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
͘
/
Ě
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ŝ
Ĩ
LJ
Ɛ
Ś
Ž
ƌ
ƚ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
ů
Ž
Ŷ
Ő
Ğ
ƌ
Ͳ
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
ŵ
ŝ
ŵ
Ɖ
ů
Ğ
ŵ
ĞŶ
ƚ
Ă
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ɛƚ
ƌ
Ă
ƚ
Ğ
Ő
LJ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ɛ
Ƶ
Ɖ
Ɖ
Ž
ƌ
ƚ
Ă
Ŷ
ŝ
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
ŝ
Ă
ů
ŝ
Ŷ
ǀ
Ğ
Ɛ
ƚ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ŝ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ś
Ğ
Ŷ
Ğ
ŝ
Ő
Ś
ď
Ž
ƌ
Ś
Ž
Ž
Ě
ƚŽ
Đ
Ă
ƚ
Ă
ů
LJ
nj
Ğ
ƚŚ
Ğ
ǀ
ŝ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
͘
Ψ
Ϯ
ϱ
Ϭ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
,Ğ
Ă
ů
ƚ
Ś
Ž
Ŷ
ƚ
Ś
Ğ
'
Ž
W
Ƶ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
,
Ğ
Ă
ů
ƚ
Ś
dž
Ɖ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ƶ
Ɖ
Ž
Ŷ
ƚ
Ś
Ğ
Ɖ
Ă
ƌ
ƚ
Ŷ
Ğ
ƌ
Ɛ
Ś
ŝ
Ɖ
Ɛ
Đ
ƌ
Ğ
Ă
ƚ
Ğ
Ě
Ă
Ɛ
Ɖ
Ă
ƌ
ƚ
Ž
Ĩ
ƚ
Ś
Ğ
Ɖ
ŝ
ů
Ž
ƚ
,
Ğ
Ă
ů
ƚ
Ś
Ž
Ŷ
ƚ
Ś
Ğ
'
Ž
Ɖƌ
Ž
Ő
ƌ
Ă
ŵ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ğ
dž
Ɖ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ɛ
Ğ
ƌ
ǀ
ŝ
Đ
Ğ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ž
ƌ
Ğ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ě
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ɛ
Ψ
Ϯ
Ϯ
ϱ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ƌ
Ă
ů
Ğ
Ă
Ƶ
ƚ
ŝ
Ĩ
ŝ
Đ
Ă
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ƶ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
/ŵ
Ɖ
ƌ
Ž
ǀ
Ğ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ŝ
Ɛ
ƚ
ƌ
ŝ
Đ
ƚ
WƵ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
^
Ă
Ĩ
Ğ
ƚ
LJ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
Ƶ
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
>
ŝ
Ĩ
Ğ
ZĞ
Ɛ
Ž
Ƶ
ƌ
Đ
Ğ
Ɛ
hƚ
ŝ
ů
ŝ
nj
Ğ
Ĩ
Ƶ
Ŷ
Ě
Ɛ
ƚ
Ž
Ğ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ă
ď
ů
ŝ
Ɛ
Ś
Ă
Đ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ƌ
Ă
ů
Ƶ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
/
ŵ
Ɖ
ƌ
Ž
ǀ
Ğ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ŝ
Ɛ
ƚ
ƌ
ŝĐ
ƚ
ƚ
Ž
ĞŶ
Ś
Ă
Ŷ
Ğ
Đ
ů
Ğ
Ă
Ŷ
Ͳ
Ƶ
Ɖ
͕
Ɛ
Ŷ
Ž
ǁ
ƌ
Ğ
ŵ
Ž
ǀ
Ă
ů
͕
Ɛ
Ğ
Ă
Ɛ
Ž
Ŷ
Ă
ů
ů
ŝ
Ő
Ś
ƚ
Ɛ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ő
ƌ
Ğ
Ğ
Ŷ
Ğ
ƌ
LJ
͕
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ɖů
Ă
Đ
Ğ
ŵ
Ă
Ŭ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ő
;
Ɖ
ƌ
Ž
Ő
ƌ
Ă
ŵ
ŵ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ő
ƚ
Ž
ď
Ğ
Ě
Ğ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ő
Ŷ
Ğ
Ě
ŝ
Ŷ
Ɖ
Ă
ƌ
ƚ
Ŷ
Ğ
ƌ
Ɛ
Ś
ŝ
Ɖ
ǁ
ŝ
ƚ
Ś
Ě
ŝ
Ɛ
ƚƌ
ŝ
Đ
ƚ
ďƵ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ϳ
Ψ
ϳ
ϱ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
WƵ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
ƌ
ƚ
D
Ă
ƚ
Đ
Ś
ŝ
Ŷ
Ő
&
Ƶ
Ŷ
Ě
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
Ƶ
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
>
ŝ
Ĩ
Ğ
Z
Ğ
Ɛ
Ž
Ƶ
ƌ
Đ
Ğ
Ɛ
&
Ƶ
Ŷ
Ě
ŝ
Ŷ
Ő
ƚ
Ž
Đ
Ž
Ɛ
ƚ
Ɛ
Ś
Ă
ƌ
Ğ
Ɖ
Ƶ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
Ă
ƌ
ƚ
ŝ
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
ŝ
Ă
ƚ
ŝ
ǀ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ž
Ŷ
Ɖ
ƌ
ŝ
ǀ
Ă
ƚ
Ğ
Ɖ
ƌ
Ž
Ɖ
Ğ
ƌ
ƚ
LJ
Ψ
ϳ
ϱ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
dž
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
Ŷ
Ă
ů
ͬ
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
Ƶ
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
W
Ă
ƌ
ƚ
Ŷ
Ğ
ƌ
Ɛ
Ś
ŝ
Ɖ
Ɛ
zŽ
Ƶ
ƚ
Ś
K
Ƶ
ƚ
ƌ
Ğ
Ă
Đ
Ś
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ŷ
Ő
Ă
Ő
Ğ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
Ƶ
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
>
ŝ
Ĩ
Ğ
Z
Ğ
Ɛ
Ž
Ƶ
ƌ
Đ
Ğ
Ɛ
͕
W
Ƶ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
^Ă
Ĩ
Ğ
ƚ
LJ
͕
W
Ƶ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
,
Ğ
Ă
ů
ƚ
Ś
͕
Đ
Ž
Ŷ
Ž
ŵ
ŝ
Đ
Ğ
ǀ
Ğ
ů
Ž
Ɖ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ψ
ϭ
ϱ
ϴ
͕
ϭ
ϯ
ϯ
Wƌ
Ž
Ő
ƌ
Ă
ŵ
ŝ
ƚ
Ğ
ŵ
W
Ƶ
ƌ
Ɖ
Ž
Ɛ
Ğ
ͬ
Ě
Ğ
Ɛ
Đ
ƌ
ŝ
Ɖ
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
<Ğ
LJ
ƌ
Ğ
Ă
tŽ
ƌ
Ŭ
Ĩ
Ž
ƌ
Đ
Ğ
Ğ
ǀ
Ğ
ů
Ž
Ɖ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
W
ƌ
Ž
Ő
ƌ
Ă
ŵ
Ψ
ϱ
ϲ
Ϭ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
Đ
Ž
Ŷ
Ž
ŵ
ŝ
Đ
Ğ
ǀ
Ğ
ů
Ž
Ɖ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
;
Z
Ğ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ě
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ĂŶ
Ě
Ƶ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
Đ
Ž
Ŷ
Ž
ŵ
ŝ
Đ
^
ƚ
Ă
ď
ŝ
ů
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
Ϳ
Ă
Ƶ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ğ
t
ƌ
ŝ
Ő
Ś
ƚ
D
Ğ
ŵ
Ž
ƌ
ŝ
Ă
ů
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
Ƶ
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
>
ŝ
Ĩ
Ğ
Z
Ğ
Ɛ
Ž
Ƶ
ƌ
Đ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
ŝ
Ɛ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ă
ƌ
ƚ
ŵ
Ğ
ŵŽ
ƌ
ŝ
Ă
ů
Ψ
Ϯ
ϱ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
dž
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
Ŷ
Ă
ů
d
Ž
ƚ
Ă
ů
Ψ
Ϯ
͕
ϰ
ϰ
ϯ
͕
ϭ
ϯ
ϯ
ŝ
Ő
ŝ
ƚ
Ă
ů
D
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
Ă
Ő
Ğ
Ž
Ă
ƌ
Ě
Ɛ
W
Ƶ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
,
Ğ
Ă
ů
ƚ
Ś
͕
W
Ƶ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
^
Ă
Ĩ
Ğ
ƚ
LJ
dž
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
Ŷ
Ă
ů
Ě
ŝ
Ő
ŝ
ƚ
Ă
ů
ŵ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
Ă
Ő
Ğ
ď
Ž
Ă
ƌ
Ě
Ɛ
Ă
ƚ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
Ĩ
Ă
Đ
ŝ
ů
ŝ
ƚ
ŝ
Ğ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ž
Ɖ
ƌ
Ž
ŵ
Ž
ƚ
Ğ
ď
Ğƚ
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
ĐŽ
ŵ
ŵ
Ƶ
ŝ
Đ
Ă
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ɛ
ƚ
ƌ
Ă
ƚ
Ğ
Ő
ŝ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ψ
ϭ
Ϯ
Ϯ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ž
Ě
Ğ
Z
Ğ
Ě
W
Ƶ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
,
Ğ
Ă
ů
ƚ
Ś
͕
W
Ƶ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
^
Ă
Ĩ
Ğ
ƚ
LJ
Z
Ğ
ǀ
Ğ
Ŷ
Ƶ
Ğ
ƌ
Ğ
Ɖ
ů
Ă
Đ
Ğ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ƚ
Ž
Ɖ
Ă
LJ
Ĩ
Ž
ƌ
Ž
Ğ
Z
Ğ
Ě
Ɛ
Ğ
ƌ
ǀ
ŝ
Đ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ĩ
Ž
ƌ
ƚ
Ś
ƌ
Ğ
Ğ
LJ
Ğ
Ă
ƌ
Ɛ
Ψ
Ϯ
ϰ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
WŽ
ů
ŝ
Đ
Ğ
ů
Ă
ď
Ž
ƌ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ƶ
Ě
LJ
W
Ƶ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
^
Ă
Ĩ
Ğ
ƚ
LJ
^
ƚ
Ƶ
Ě
LJ
ƚ
Ž
Ě
Ğ
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
ŵ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ŷ
Ƶ
ŵ
ď
Ğ
ƌ
Ž
Ĩ
Ɖ
Ž
ů
ŝĐ
Ğ
Ž
Ĩ
Ĩ
ŝ
Đ
Ğ
ƌ
Ɛ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ğ
Ě
Ğ
Ě
ƚ
Ž
ŵ
Ă
ŝ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ă
ŝ
Ŷ
Ɛ
Ğ
ƌ
ǀ
ŝ
Đ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ψ
ϭ
ϯ
Ϭ
͕
ϬϬ
Ϭ
ŝ
ƌ
&
ŝ
ů
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
Ɛ
W
Ƶ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
,
Ğ
Ă
ů
ƚ
Ś
/
Ŷ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ă
ů
ů
Ă
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ž
Ĩ
Đ
ů
Ğ
Ă
Ŷ
Ă
ŝ
ƌ
Ĩ
ŝ
ů
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ś
Ğ
Đ
Ă
ď
Ɛ
Ž
Ĩ
Ĩ
ŝ
ƌ
Ğ
ƚ
ƌ
Ƶ
Đ
Ŭ
Ɛ
Ψ
ϭ
Ϯ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
YƵ
Ă
Ŷ
ƚ
ŝ
Ĩ
ŝ
ƚ
Ϯ
ƌ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɖ
ŝ
ƌ
Ă
ƚ
Ž
ƌ
ƚ
Ğ
Ɛ
ƚ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ő
ƐLJ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ğ
ŵ
WƵ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
,
Ğ
Ă
ů
ƚ
Ś
WƵ
ƌ
Đ
Ś
Ă
Ɛ
Ğ
Ă
ƌ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɖ
ŝ
ƌ
Ă
ƚ
Ž
ƌ
ƚ
Ğ
Ɛ
ƚ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ő
Ɛ
LJ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ğ
ŵ
ƚ
Ž
ƚ
Ğ
Ɛ
ƚ
ƌ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɖ
ŝ
ƌ
Ă
ƚ
Ž
ƌ
Ĩ
ŝ
ƚ
Ͳ
ƚ
ĞƐ
ƚ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ő
ƌ
Ğ
Ƌ
Ƶ
ŝ
ƌ
Ğ
Ě
ĂŶ
Ŷ
Ƶ
Ă
ů
ů
LJ
ϭϯ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ψ
&ƌ
Ž
Ŷ
ƚ
>
ŝ
Ŷ
Ğ
Z
Ğ
ƚ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
ZĞ
Đ
Ž
Ő
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
/
Ŷ
Đ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ŝ
ǀ
Ğ
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
Ƶ
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
>
ŝ
Ĩ
Ğ
Z
Ğ
Ɛ
Ž
Ƶ
ƌ
Đ
Ğ
Ɛ
W
ƌ
Ž
ǀ
ŝ
Ě
Ğ
Ă
ď
Ž
Ŷ
Ƶ
Ɛ
Ĩ
Ž
ƌ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ɛ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ŝ
Ă
ů
Ĩ
ƌ
Ž
Ŷ
ƚ
ů
ŝ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ğ
ŵ
Ɖ
ů
Ž
LJ
Ğ
Ğ
Ɛ
ǁ
Ś
Ž
ǁ
Ž
ƌ
Ŭ
Ğ
Ě
ŝ
Ŷ
Ͳ
Ɖ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ž
Ŷ
ƚŚ
ƌ
Ž
Ƶ
ŐŚ
ƚ
Ś
Ğ
ƉĂŶ
Ě
Ğ
ŵ
ŝ
Đ
Ψ
Ϯ
ϴ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
WƵ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
^
Ă
Ĩ
Ğ
ƚ
LJ
W
ƌ
Ž
ũ
Ğ
Đ
ƚ
D
Ă
Ŷ
Ă
Ő
Ğ
ƌ
WƵ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
^
Ă
Ĩ
Ğ
ƚ
LJ
E
Ğ
ǁ
Ɖ
Ž
Ɛ
ŝ
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
ƚ
Ž
Ă
Ɛ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ɛ
ƚ
ǁ
ŝ
ƚ
Ś
Đ
Ž
Ž
ƌ
Ě
ŝ
Ŷ
Ă
ƚ
ŝ
Ŷ
Ő
ƚ
Ś
Ğ
W
Ƶ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
^
Ă
Ĩ
Ğ
ƚ
LJ
Z
Ğ
Ɛ
Ž
ů
Ƶ
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
/ŵ
Ɖ
ů
Ğ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ă
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
ŝ
ƚ
ƚ
Ğ
Ğ
͘
d
Ś
ŝ
Ɛ
ŝ
Ŷ
Đ
ů
Ƶ
Ě
Ğ
Ɛ
ϭ
&
d
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ɛ
Ƶ
Ɖ
Ɖ
ů
ŝ
Ğ
Ɛ
Ĩ
Ž
ƌ
ϭϮ
ŵŽ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ś
Ɛ
͘
Ψ
ϭ
ϱ
Ϭ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
WŽ
ů
ŝ
Đ
Ğ
Z
Ğ
ƚ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
/
Ŷ
Đ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ŝ
ǀ
Ğ
WƵ
ď
ů
ŝ
Đ
^
Ă
Ĩ
Ğ
ƚ
LJ
d
Ś
ŝ
Ɛ
ŵ
Ğ
Ă
Ɛ
Ƶ
ƌ
Ğ
ǁ
Ă
Ɛ
ƚ
Ă
Ŭ
Ğ
Ŷ
Ă
Ɛ
Ɖ
Ă
ƌ
ƚ
Ž
Ĩ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ő
Ž
ƚ
ŝ
Ă
ƚ
ŝ
Ž
Ŷ
Ɛ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ă
ŵ
Ğ
Ă
Ŷ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ž
Ɛ
ƚ
Ă
ď
Ă
ů
ŝ
nj
Ğ
ĂŶ
Ě
ƌ
Ğ
ƚ
Ă
ŝ
Ŷ
ƉŽů
ŝ
Đ
Ğ
Ž
Ĩ
Ĩ
ŝ
Đ
Ğ
ƌ
Ɛ
Ě
Ƶ
ƌ
ŝ
Ŷ
ŐĐ
ŝ
ǀ
ŝ
ů
Ƶ
Ŷ
ƌ
Ğ
Ɛ
ƚ
͘
Ψ
ϭ
ϵ
Ϯ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
,Ğ
ƌ
ŝ
ƚ
Ă
Ő
Ğ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
ZĞ
ǀ
Ğ
Ŷ
Ƶ
Ğ
ƌ
Ğ
Ɖ
ů
Ă
Đ
Ğ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ĩ
Ž
ƌ
ƚ
Ś
Ğ
,
Ğ
ƌ
ŝ
ƚ
Ă
Ő
Ğ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
Ͳ
Ƶ
ƚ
ŝ
ů
ŝ
nj
Ğ
Ĩ
Ƶ
Ŷ
Ě
Ɛ
ƚ
Ž
Ğdž
Ɖ
ů
Ž
ƌ
Ğ
ǁĂ
LJ
Ɛ
ƚ
Ž
Ğ
dž
Ɖ
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ă
Ŷ
Ě
Ğ
Ŷ
Ś
Ă
Ŷ
Đ
Ğ
ƚ
Ś
Ğ
,
Ğ
ƌ
ŝ
ƚ
Ă
Ő
Ğ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
Ζ
Ɛ
Đ
Ž
ŵ
ŵ
Ƶ
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
LJ
ď
Ğ
Ŷ
Ğ
Ĩŝ
ƚ
Ɛ
Ψ
ϭ
ϱ
Ϭ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
/Ŷ
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
Ŷ
Ă
ů
d
Ž
ƚ
Ă
ů
ϴϮ
ϭ
͕
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ϭ
Ψ
dŽ
ƚ
Ă
ů
ŝ
Ŷ
ǀ
Ğ
Ɛ
ƚ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
Ψ
ϯ
͕
Ϯ
ϲ
ϰ
͕
ϭ
ϯ
ϯ
/Ŷ
ƚ
Ğ
ƌ
Ŷ
Ă
ů
W
ƌ
Ž
Ő
ƌ
Ă
ŵ
Ɛ
ͬ
/
Ŷ
ŝ
ƚ
ŝ
Ă
ƚ
ŝ
ǀ
Ğ
Ɛ
ͬ
Z
Ğ
ǀ
Ğ
Ŷ
Ƶ
Ğ
Z
Ğ
Ɖ
ů
Ă
Đ
Ğ
ŵ
Ğ
Ŷ
ƚ
ĐƚŝǀŝƚLJ dŝŵĞůŝŶĞ
ZĞĐĞŝǀĞZW'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ :ƵŶĞ͕ϮϬϮϭ
ZĞĐĞŝǀĞZW&ƵŶĚŝŶŐ ƵŐƵƐƚ͕ϮϬϮϭ
ƐƚĂďůŝƐŚZW džƉĞŶĚŝƚƵƌĞWƌŝŶĐŝƉůĞƐ ^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌ͕ϮϬϮϭ
^ŽůŝĐŝƚŝŶƚĞƌŶĂůƐƉĞŶĚŝŶŐǀŝĂĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ ^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌ;ϯƌĚǁĞĞŬͿ͕ϮϬϮϭ
ŽƵŶĐŝůZĞƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶĐĐĞƉƚŝŶŐZW&ƵŶĚŝŶŐ ^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌ;ϯƌĚǁĞĞŬͿ͕ϮϬϮϭ
'ƌŽƵƉ^ĞůĞĐƚ/ŶƚĞƌŶĂů
ƌĞĂƚĞƐƚĂĨĨƵƉĚĂƚĞĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĞƐƐƌĞƉŽƌƚŽŶ
ĞLJŽŶĚKs//ŶŶŽǀĂƚŝŽŶ/ŶŝƚŝĂƚŝǀĞƐ ^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌ;ϰƚŚǁĞĞŬͿ͕ϮϬϮϭ
KŶďŽĂƌĚĞǀĂůƵĂƚŽƌĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚĨŽƌĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ
Z ^d/ŶŶŽǀĂƚŝŽŶ/ŶŝƚŝĂƚŝǀĞƐĂŶĚZW
ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ/ŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚWƌŽũĞĐƚƐ
^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌ͕ϮϬϮϭʹ^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌ͕ϮϬϮϮ;ϭϮŵŽŶƚŚƐͿ
^ŽůŝĐŝƚƉƵďůŝĐƌĂŶŬŝŶŐŽĨŶĞĞĚƐ;ƉĞƌŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚ
ĂƌĞĂƐĨŽƌZ ^&ƵŶĚŝŶŐͿĂŶĚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ KĐƚŽďĞƌ;Ϯ ŶĚǁĞĞŬͿ͕ϮϬϮϭ
ƌĂĨƚďƵĚŐĞƚƵƐĞŽĨĂůůZWĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ EŽǀĞŵďĞƌKĐƚŽďĞƌ^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌ;ϭƐƚϯƌĚϰƚŚǁĞĞŬͿ͕ϮϬϮϭ
WƌĞƐĞŶƚZWĨƵŶĚŝŶŐĞdžƉĞŶĚŝƚƵƌĞƉůĂŶƚŽƚŚĞ
ŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝů EŽǀĞŵďĞƌKĐƚŽďĞƌϮϱ͕ϮϬϮϭ
/ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƚŚĞZWĨƵŶĚŝŶŐĞdžƉĞŶĚŝƚƵƌĞƉůĂŶ͘ EŽǀĞŵďĞƌ͕ϮϬϮϭ
&ĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞŽĨĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶǁŝƚŚĂĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŐƌŽƵƉ
ƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨ
ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚĨŽƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
KĐƚŽďĞƌ;ϭ ƐƚǁĞĞŬͿ^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌ;ϯƌĚǁĞĞŬͿ͕ϮϬϮϭ
ŽŵŵĞŶƚ
dŽĚĚͬZĞŐŐŝĞ
DĞŐƐĞŶĚŽƵƚĨŽƌŵƚŽĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘
'ƌŽƵƉ
ĂƌŝƐƐĂͬŶĚƌĞǁ,͘
ZĞŐŐŝĞ
WʹĐƌĞĂƚĞĚďƵĐŬĞƚƐƚŚĞŶZ&WĨŽƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƚŽ
ĐŽŶĚƵĐƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚŽƐĞĂƌĞĂƐ
'ƌŽƵƉZĞĐŽŶǀĞŶĞʹKŶƵĐŬĞƚƐŽƌƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨƉƌŽƉŽƐĂůƐ
WƌŽĐĞƐƐ;ϮƉĂƌƚŵĞĞƚŝŶŐͿ͗
Ͳ'ƌŽƵƉŽŶǀĞƌƐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƵƉĚĂƚĞŽŶĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ
/ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĂůƐĞƐƐŝŽŶŽŶƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐĞĨĨŽƌƚƐ
Ͳ/ŶƚĞƌĂĐƚŝǀĞĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶŽŶƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝĞƐƚŚĂƚŝŶĨŽƌŵ
ďƵĐŬĞƚƐ
DĞŐͬ:ĂŶĞůůĞͬZĞŐŐŝĞ
ĂƌďͬŶŐĞů
ŶĚƌĞǁ^͘
'ƌŽƵƉ
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SPEND UP TO $3,264,133 IN
AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUNDS THROUGH 2024
WHEREAS, on March 11, 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act
of 2021 (H.R. 1319) into law. The American Rescue Plan Act provides $1.9 trillion in
additional relief to respond to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19); and
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center was allocated $3,264,133 which can be used to
support urgent COVID-19 response efforts to continue to decrease the spread of the virus and
bring the pandemic under control, replace lost revenue for eligible state, local, territorial and
Tribal governments to strengthen support for vital public services and help retain jobs, support
immediate economic stability for households and business and address systemic public health
and economic challenges that have contributed to the unequal impact of the pandemic, as well as
necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, on June _, 2021, the City of Brooklyn Center received $1,623,762.20, and
a supplemental distribution of $53,173.74 of the $3,264,133 with the remaining balance being
available for requesting in June 2022; and
WHEREAS, the period of performance for the American Rescue Plan Act is from March
3, 2021 and must be obligated by December 21, 2024, which means all funds must be
encumbered and projects contracted. By December 31, 2026, all projects must be complete,
including all payments made for encumbrances and projects; and
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has established guiding principles for the use
of the funds and has utilized community feedback to develop a 2021-2024 investment plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center hereby authorizes staff to spend up to $3,264,133 in American Rescue
Recovery Act funds between 2022 and 2024 in accordance with the proposed investment plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all planned investments that do not occur in a given
year will roll forward to the following year, provided all funds are expended by the end of 2024.
RESOLUTION NO. _________
March 14, 2022
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
3/15/2022
1
AllocationofAmericanRescue
PlanActFunds
BrooklynCenterCityCouncilPresentation
Monday,February28,2022
ARPAFundsͲ Background
•March11,2021theAmericanRescuePlanAct
wassignedintolaw
•Provides$1.9trillioninrelieftorespondtothe
COVIDͲ19pandemic
•Fundingisprimarilyallocatedbasedon
population
•BrooklynCenterisprojectedtoreceive
$3,264,133inARPAfunds
•Halfofthefundswerereceivedin2021.The
balanceoffudswillbereceivedin2022.
•FundsmustbespentbyDecember2024
January10,2022CityCouncilPresentation
3/15/2022
2
ARPAFundsͲ Background
•WhenCARESActfundswereallocatedin2020,thetimeline
tospenddownwasveryshort. Asaresult,mostofthe
fundingwenttocovercostsincurredbytheCity,orwere
otherwisefocusedinternally.
•CARESActfundingsupportedavarietyofprojectsincluding
HVACsystemupgrades,employeewages,smallbusiness
support,foodshelfoperations,andcommunityinnovative
initiatives.
•TheCityabidedbyseveralprinciplesincluding:
–Erringonthesideofsafetyofstaffandthepublic
–RecoverorreimbursetheCityforexpendituresmadein
responsetotheCOVIDͲPandemic
–Helpingresidentssurvive,respondandthrivebeyond(upto18
months)theCOVIDͲ19Pandemic
January10,2022CityCouncilPresentation
ARPAFundsͲ Background
GuidingPrinciples:
•Servingaclearanddirectpublicpurposeandbenefit
•Take measuresthaterronthesideofimprovingthesafety/healthofstaffandthe
publicrelatedtotheCOVIDͲ19Pandemic
•BolsteringLongͲtermCommunicationCapacitybetweentheCityandresidents
(CitywideandEmergencycommunications–Electronicandotherwise)–
promotingpublichealththroughencouragingvaccines,COVIDawarenessin
general,Etc. BolsteringcommunicationsthroughouttheCityrelatedtoevents,
facilities,accessibility,andservices.Enhancedcommunicationforvarious
emergencyandsafetycampaigns(i.e.codered,vaccines,etc.)
•Recoveringorreimbursementforoperationalfinancialhardship
•Maximizeuseoffundstoinvestandincreasecapacitywithinthecommunityto
recoverandthrivebeyondtheCOVIDͲ19Pandemic
–Year OneͲ 60%communityinvestmentand40%operationalinvestment
–Year Two Ͳ 70%communityinvestmentand30%operationalinvestment
•UsefundinginamannerthatprovideslongͲterm,multiͲgenerationalwealth
buildingandeconomicstability.
•Usefundinginamannerthatlowersoveralltaxburdenofresidents
•AnynewprogramsdevelopedorfundedwithARPAfundswillhaveaclearly
identifiedsustainabilityplanforhowtheywillcontinueafterfundingperiodisover
January10,2022CityCouncilPresentation
3/15/2022
3
CommunityEngagementProcess
•SinceJune,theCityhascoordinatedwithcommunity
partners,residents,localbusinesses,nonprofitsandother
citystafftodevelopaninvestmentplanforthefunds
•EvolvingBrooklynCenter:ACommunityͲCenteredCity
•Keyareascriticaltostabilizingcommunity
–PublicSafety/Security
–EconomicDevelopment
–PublicHealth
–CommunityLifeResources(foodandhousing)
•CrossͲdepartmentstaffteammettoidentifypossibleuses
for fundsanddevelopprocessforidentifyingallocation
proposals.
January10,2022CityCouncilPresentation
CommunityEngagementProcess
•Communitygroupconvenedtwiceovertwo
weeks
–Meeting1:establishedguidelinesandreviewed
proposedprogramsandinitiatives.Identified
gaps.
–Meeting2:Builtconsensusonprioritiesfor useof
fundsandprogramstobefunded
January10,2022CityCouncilPresentation
3/15/2022
4
ARPAFundingPlan
•Outofthecommunityengagementprocess,andthrough
theworkofidentifyingprogramfunding,severalthemes
arosearoundwhichARPAfundedinitiativesrevolved.The
fundingfocusesonprogramsthat:
–Buildcapacity.Thisfocusisachievedthroughleveragingexisting
assetsinthecommunity,strengtheningpartnershipsand
investingincommunity.
–Centereconomicdevelopmentandyouth.Amajorityofthe
programsandinitiativesthatwereprioritizedthroughthe
communityengagementprocessinvolvedafocusonmultiͲ
generationalwealthbuildingandyouthengagement.
–Buildingcommunity.TheprocesstocreatetheARPAinvestment
planwasimbeddedincommunity,andinvolvedcommunityͲ
basedvisioning.Thefundingcentersaroundstrengthening
communitypartnershipsandresources.
January10,2022CityCouncilPresentation
ARPAFundingPlan
•75%offundingisallocatedexternally–with
communitypartners
•25%offundingisallocatedoninternalprojectsand
initiatives
•ARPAInvestmentPlanallowsforflexibilityovertime–
adjustmentsmaybeneededasmoreinformation
becomesknownaboutindividualinitiatives
•Projectwillbemovedforwardbasedontimingand
availabilityoffunds
•Staffwillprovideannualreportontheuseofthefunds
andprogramimplementation
January10,2022CityCouncilPresentation
3/15/2022
5
ARPAFundingPlan
January10,2022CityCouncilPresentation
ARPAFundingPlan
January10,2022CityCouncilPresentation
3/15/2022
6
ARPAFundingPlan
January10,2022CityCouncilPresentation
!"
# $%# &
'( ' )*"
+, -!!!
*$'.
!/! )!0 1/ 2 ! ! / 2 2 !30
3
'+
"&
4 5 6 !"3 0 -7 /30 $ * !
!!"0 ! ! !!
! 3 0 !! !!! 0 3 !!)+77 / 0 ! 8!7
- ) !7 " 4! " 9 : " 4 ) !-! ; ! )!00 ) !3
/4 !!0 - 0 4 0< ! = 0 7/30 ! 8! !/ 7 )
0"
) >"
"0 ! *7 2 !/ 774 ! 0
!! ? ! /4 ) !0
!! !/ 7 - !'+
!>0 ! /4 !/ 7 - '+
! /4 !"@'0
! )!0 ) ! ) A /4 !30 ! 7- / !@"
0 !/ 2
! !-- 30 ! 7! + ; ! )!07 !30
3'+
0 9!! 70 7 !! ! /3 4 B!/ 7 / 7 7 !7
7 !" 0 0 ! )!0 "-!)
3 !!) ! ) ) ) 7 !!C
0 -- / /4/ !
3 30 "; / /4/ !C
!-+ 3 C
D3 E D! 4
00 7 " B 70 - 7 - 7 7 ! 0
7 30 ! 0 - 30 7 )
0 ! / ! /3--: - / -/7 !0 !! 0 7
0!! / ! ! !/3! 4 0 /E ! # 7
/!! A
* A ! ) 7 !"! 4 !0 !
'+
0 -) 37 !3-! 4 5F6!B5<60 !B7 7 !0 4
- ! 3 D - !
7 7 ! /9 "0 B! 7 ! 4 7 ) ! ! -7
03 ! 2 ! ) !7) " !! " ! /4
!!2 ) !-!3 G4!) " : ) 70! 3 !G" 00! !
9 !! " ") 4 "7 + "4 "! -"!0 " " 0" 0;3; "
0 0 ! 4!) 3-0 0 D - !0 7
) ! !!)+) !# 7
74 0
0 7/ !/
!= " 00! );) ! %,*!= 0 !7 + 00
$*
!! ! !
-) 3!-!! !7 9 3 !/
0 ) !! !!
= 7 ) ! ! )!0 "0
/9 !# 7
- 730 4/
!!!7!
# 3< !3
774 ) 7)!0 0 *;2!
& !7 7 "
H 0 ! ! I " ! !7! 0
8! )! ! 4 !
4 / ) 30 7 7 7
&
!
0
--,- " 7 / B
""# $"
!7/ $7 7
!/
!/? I
7 ! / >
2 ! /
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING VOTING PRECINCTS AND DESIGNATING
POLLING PLACES FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MN
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center was divided into in seven voting
precincts described by Resolution No. 2012-43, adopted by the City Council March 12, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Minnesota has been redistricted; and
WHEREAS, city staff has engaged a selected number of residents to gain input
regarding re-establishing the voting precincts; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute Section 204B.14, subd. 3 (d) requires that
precinct boundaries must be re-established within 60 days of when the legislature has been
redistricted of at least 19 weeks before the state primary election, whichever comes first; and
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has been redistricted into six voting
precincts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the boundaries of the voting precincts are hereby established and
the polling places are hereby designated as follows:
PRECINCT 1 - Earle Brown Heritage Center, 6155 Earle Brown Drive
South boundary: commencing at the southeast city limits at the Mississippi River and the
centerline of 53rd Avenue North west to Shingle Creek Parkway.
West boundary: commencing at the centerline of 53rd Avenue North and Shingle Creek; north to
the centerline of County Road 10; east on County Road 10 to Shingle Creek Parkway; north on
Shingle Creek to the center line of John Martin Drive.
North boundary: commencing the centerline of John Martin Boulevard east to centerline of Lilac
Drive North; northeast to the centerline of 59th Avenue North; east to the City limits of the
Mississippi River.
East boundary: commencing at the centerline of 59th Avenue North and the east city limit of the
Mississippi River; south along the east City limit to the centerline of 53rd Avenue North.
PRECINCT 2 - Earle Brown Heritage Center, 6155 Earle Brown Drive
South boundary: commencing at Shingle Creek and County Road 10; north on centerline of
Shingle Creek to the centerline of John Martin Drive; east on John Martin Drive to the centerline
of Lilac Drive North; northeast to the centerline of 59th Avenue North; east on 59th Avenue North
to the east City limit of the Mississippi River.
West boundary: commencing at the centerline of County Road 10 and Shingle Creek north to the
centerline of I-94/694 and Shingle Creek; west along I-94/694 to the centerline of Xerxes Avenue
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
North to south to the centerline of 69th Avenue North.
North boundary: commencing at the going east on 69th Avenue North to the centerline of Dupont
Avenue North; south along the centerline of Dupont Avenue North to the centerline of 65th Avenue
North; east on the centerline of 65th Avenue North to the centerline of Willow Lane; north on
Willow Lane to the north property line of 6524 Willow Lane; go east on the north property line of
6524 Willow Lane to the City limits at the Mississippi River.
East boundary: commencing at the north property line of 6524 Willow Lane and the east City
limits at the Mississippi River; south along the City limits at the Mississippi River to the centerline
of 57th Avenue North.
PRECINCT 3 - Evergreen Park Elementary School, 7020 Dupont Ave N
South boundary: commencing at the east City limits at the Mississippi River and the south
property line of 6530 Willow Lane; south on the centerline of Willow Lane to the centerline of
65th Avenue North; west on the centerline of 65th Avenue North to the centerline of Dupont Avenue
North; north on the centerline of Dupont Avenue North to the centerline of 69th Avenue North;
west on the centerline of 69th Avenue North to Palmer Lake Drive.
West boundary: commencing at the centerline 69th Avenue North and West Palmer Lake Drive
north to the north City limits.
North boundary: commencing at the centerline of West Palmer Lake Drive and the north City
limits east to the northeast City limits at the Mississippi River.
East boundary: commencing at the northeast city limits at the Mississippi River south from the
centerline of 73rd Avenue North to the south property line of 6530 Willow Lane.
PRECINCT 4 - Spiritual Life Church, 6865 Shingle Creek Parkway
South boundary: commencing at the intersection of the centerline of Xerxes Avenue North and
the centerline of I-94/694 to the west City limits.
West boundary: commencing at the west City limits at the centerline of I-94/694 north to the
northwest City limits.
North boundary: commencing at the northwest City limits east to the centerline of West Palmer
Lake Drive.
East boundary: commencing at the north City limits at the centerline of West Palmer Lake Drive
south to the centerline of 69th Avenue North, east along the centerline of 69th Avenue North to the
centerline of Xerxes Avenue North, south along the centerline of Xerxes Avenue North to the
centerline of I-94/694.
PRECINCT 5 – Brooklyn Center Community Center, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
South boundary: commencing at the west City limit and 61st Avenue North; east on 61st Avenue
North to the east property lines of 4112 61st Avenue; north to the north property lines of 4106,
4100, 4012, 4006, 4000, 3918, 3912, 3906, 3900, 3824, 3818, 3808 61st Avenue North; continuing
east on 61st Avenue North to Brooklyn Boulevard; continuing east on the north property lines of
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
6100 and 6101 Brooklyn Boulevard, 3318, 3312, 3306, 3300, 3218, 3212, 3206, 3200, 3118, 3112,
3108, 3100, 3018, 3012, 3006 61st Avenue, then 6101 and 6030 Xerxes Avenue North, to Shingle
Creek. (following the south border of the Osseo #279 School District)
West boundary: commencing at the centerline of 63rd Avenue North and the west City limits
north to the centerline of I-94/694.
North boundary: commencing at the west City limits at the centerline of I-94/694 east to Shingle
Creek.
East boundary: commencing at the centerline of I-94/694 and Shingle Creek south to the
centerline of 61st Avenue North.
PRECINCT 6 – Northport Elementary School, 5421 Brooklyn Blvd
South boundary: commencing at Shingle Creek at the south City limits west to the southwest city
limits.
West boundary: commencing at the southwest City limits north to the centerline of 61st Avenue
North.
North boundary: commencing at the west City limit and 61st Avenue North; east on 61st Avenue
North to the east property line of 4112 61st Avenue; north to the north property lines of 4106, 4100,
4012, 4006, 4000, 3918, 3912, 3906, 3900, 3824, 3818, 3808 61st Avenue North; continuing east
on 61st Avenue North to Brooklyn Boulevard; continuing east on the north property lines of 6100
and 6101 Brooklyn Boulevard, 3318, 3312, 3306, 3300, 3218, 3212, 3206, 3200, 3118, 3112,
3108, 3100, 3018, 3012, 3006 61st Avenue, then 6101 and 6030 Xerxes Avenue North, to Shingle
Creek. (following the north border of Robbinsdale #281 School District.
East boundary: commencing at Shingle Creek south and the southeast corner of 6254 Brooklyn
Drive to the south City limits.
March 14, 2022
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
3/15/2022
1
Brooklyn Center
Redistricting
CityCouncilMeeting–March14,2022
BarbSuciu,CityClerk/InterimAssistantCityManager
What is Redistricting?
•Redistricting is the process of redrawing the boundaries of
election districts to ensure that people of each district are
equally represented.
•This is done after the completion of Congressional
reapportionment, which decides how many seats each
state has in the 435 member House of Representatives.
•Reapportionment happens following the Decennial
Census.
2
3/15/2022
2
Minnesota Redistricting
3
•October8,2018
•The State Legislature is responsible for drawing the legislative districts.
The deadline was February 15, 2022. The courts determined the
redistricting and released the final plan on February 15th.
•Cities deadline for finalizing the redistricting plan is March 30, 2022
Current
Precinct
Map
4
3/15/2022
3
Final Redistricting Plan
•Precinct1and2(SD#286)
•havebeensplitwiththe
intentionofincreasein
populationwiththe
opportunitysite.
•EarleBrownHeritageCenter
5
Final Redistricting Plan
•Precinct3(SD#11)
•eliminatedmultiple
schooldistricts
•EvergreenElementary
6
3/15/2022
4
Final Redistricting Plan
•October8,2018
•Precinct4and5(SD#279)
•Eliminatedmultipleschool
districtsintheseprecincts
•SpiritualLifeChurchand
CommunityCenter
respectively.
7
Final Redistricting Plan
•Precinct6(SD#281)
•eliminatedmultipleprecincts
•NorthportElementarySchool
8
3/15/2022
5
Final Redistricting Plan
•ThesechangeswillbeeffectivewiththeStatePrimaryElection
onAugust9,2022.
•EliminatedallmultiͲschooldistrictprecincts.
•Eliminatedoneprecinct
9
Council Action
•Approvetheresolutionestablishingvotingprecinctsand
designatingpollingplacesfortheCityofBrooklynCenter,MN
10
3/15/2022
6
Questions?
11
!"# $ %
&
'
&
%
( ) #)*#*)
*+,,
(
-- * .# #/$
(
*""**/
. #"##
! "#$
%
&
#
' (#