Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020 08-24 CCPCouncil Study Session V I RT UA L meeting being conducted by electronic means in accordance with Minnesota S tatutes, section 13D.021 P ublic portion available for connection by calling 1-312-535-8110 A ccess Code: 133 316 6939 A ugust 24, 2020 AGE NDA 1.City Council Discussion of Agenda Items and Questions - 6 p.m. 2.M iscellaneous 3.Discussion of Work S ession Agenda Item as T ime P ermits 4.Adjourn C IT Y C O UNC IL M E E T I NG V I RT UA L meeting being conducted by electronic means in accordance with Minnesota S tatutes, section 13D.021 P ublic portion available for connection by calling 1-312-535-8110 A ccess Code: 133 316 6939 A ugust 24, 2020 AGE NDA Meeting Mute Testing: The host will place all attendees on mute and ask that all attendees unmute themselves before starting the meeting. 1.Informal Open Forum with City Council - 6:45 p.m. Provides an opportunity for the public to address the C ounc il on items which are not on the agenda. Open Forum will be limited to 15 minutes, it is not televised, and it may not be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with presenter. Questions from the C ounc il will be for c larific ation only. Open Forum will not be used as a time for problem solving or reacting to the c omments made but, rather, for hearing the presenter for informational purposes only. I will first c all on those who notified the Clerk that they would like to speak during open forum, and then I will ask if any one else c onnected to this meeting would like to speak. W hen I do, please indicate y our name and then proc eed when I call on you. Please be sure to state your name and address before speaking. 2.Invocation - 7 p.m. - Councilmember Butler 3.Call to Order Regular Business M eeting This meeting is being conduc ted electronic ally under Minnesota Statutes, section 13D .021 due to the pandemic. For those who are connec ted to this meeting, please keep your microphone muted. I f there is an opportunity for public c omment, y ou may unmute and speak when called upon. Please do not talk over others and any one being disruptive may to ejec ted from the meeting. The packet for this meeting is on the City's website, whic h is linked on the calendar or can be found on "City Council" page. 4.Roll Call 5.P ledge of Allegiance 6.Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda The following items are c onsidered to be routine by the C ity Council and will be enac ted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the c onsent agenda and considered at the end of Council Consideration I tems. a.Approval of Minutes - Motion to approve minutes for the following meetings: August 3 - Work Session with Financial Commission August 7 - Conti nuati on Work Session wi th Financial Commi ssion August 10 - Study Session August 10 - Regular Session August 10 - Work Session b.Approval of L icenses - Motion to approve licenses as presented. c.Resolution A ccepting Work Performed and Authorizing Final P ayment, Project No. 2020-06, 2020 Pond Maintenance - Motion to approve a resolution accepting work performed and authorizing final payment, Project No. 2020-06, 2020 Pond Maintenance. d.Resolution A uthorizing Xcel Energy to Recover Cost of Undergrounding Brooklyn B oulevard Electric Transmission Facilities by a S urcharge to Brooklyn Center Xcel Ratepayers - Brooklyn B oulevard Corridor P roject Phase 2, P roject No. 2021-05 - Motion to approve a resol ution authorizing Xcel Energy to recover the cost of undergrounding Brookl yn Boulevard electric transmi ssion facilities by a surcharge to Brooklyn Center Xcel ratepayers for Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Project Phase 2, Project No. 2021-05. e.F irst Reading of an Ordinance A mending Chapter 4 of the City Code of Ordinances Regarding Water Conservation Restrictions - Moti on to approve the First Reading of an Ordi nance Amending Chapter 4 of the City Code of Ordinances Regarding Water Conservation Restrictions. f.Resolution A ccepting Work Performed and Authorizing Final P ayment, Project No. 2019-15, 70th Avenue S torm Sewer Rehabilitation P roject - Motion to approve a resolution accepting work performed and authorizing final payment, Project No. 2019-15, 70th Avenue Storm Sewer Rehabilitation Project. g.Annual Report on Franchise F ees - Receive the Annual Report on Franchise Fees 7.P resentations/Proclamations/Recognitions/Donations 8.P ublic Hearings The public hearing on this matter is now open. I will first call on those who notified the Clerk that they would like to speak to this matter, then I will ask if anyone else on this meeting would like to speak during this hearing. W hen I do, please indic ate your name and then proceed when I call on you. Please be sure to state your name and address before speaking. 9.P lanning Commission Items a.Planning Commission A pplication No. 2020-004, for Preliminary and Final P lat and Site and B uilding Plan Approvals, and the E stablishment of a P lanned Unit Development for Certain P roperties L ocated in the 6000 B lock of Brooklyn B oulevard (Commonly known as 6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 Brooklyn B oulevard) (i) Motion to adopt a resolution to approve Pl anni ng Commission Application No. 2020-004 for Preliminary and Final Plat and Site and Building Plan Approval s and the Establishment of a Planned Unit Development for the Subject Property located within the 6000 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard and commonly known as 6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 Brooklyn Boulevard, based on the findi ngs of fact and submi tted plans, and as amended by the conditions of approval in the resolution. (ii ) Moti on to approve a fi rst readi ng of an ordinance amending Chapter 35 of the Zoning Code of Ordi nances regarding the zoning classi fi cations of the Subject Property l ocated at 6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 Brooklyn Boul evard, and set the second reading and publ ic heari ng for September 14, 2020. b.Resolution Regarding Planning Commission A pplication No. 2020-004 for Preliminary and Final P lat and S ite and Building P lan A pprovals, and the Establishment of a Planned Unit Development for Certain Properties L ocated in the 6900 B lock of Brooklyn B oulevard (Commonly K nown as 6921, 6927, 6933, and 6939 B rooklyn Boulevard) (i) Motion to adopt a resolution to approve Pl anni ng Commission Application No. 2020-005 for Preliminary and Final Plat and Site and Building Plan Approval s and the Establishment of a Planned Unit Development for the Subject Property located within the 6900 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard and commonly known as 6921, 6927, 6933, and 6939 Brooklyn Boulevard, based on the findi ngs of fact and submi tted plans, and as amended by the conditions of approval in the resolution. (ii ) Moti on to approve a fi rst readi ng of an ordinance amending Chapter 35 of the Zoning Code of Ordi nances regarding the zoning classi fi cations of the Subject Property l ocated at 6921, 6927, 6933, and 6939 Brooklyn Boul evard, and set the second reading and publ ic heari ng for September 14, 2020. 10.Council Consideration Items a.Resolution A uthorizing Staff to P roceed with the B C Beyond C O V I D Community I nnovation Grant P rogram Pilot P roject, with will be funded by the General Fund through the Use of Available Contingency F unds - Approve of a resolution authorizi ng staff to proceed with the BC Beyond COVID Community Innovation Grant Pilot Project, which will be funded by the General Fund through the use of Available Contingency Funds. 11.Council Report 12.Adjournment C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:8/24/2020 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:C urt Boganey, City Manager T H R O U G H :D r. Reggie Edwards, D eputy C ity M anager BY:Barb S uciu, C ity C lerk S U B J E C T:A pproval of Minutes B ackground: I n accordance with M innesota S tate S tatute 15.17, the official records of all mee5ngs must be documented and approved by the governing body. B udget I ssues: -None. S trategic Priories and Values: O pera5onal Excellence AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip5on U pload D ate Type A ugus t 3 8/18/2020 Backup M aterial A ugus t 7 8/18/2020 Backup M aterial A ugus t 10 S tudy S es s ion 8/18/2020 Backup M aterial A ugus t 10 Work S es s ion 8/18/2020 Backup M aterial A ugus t 10 Regular S ession 8/19/2020 Backup M aterial MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/FINANCIAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND STATE OF MINNESOTA JOINT WORK SESSION AUGUST 3, 2020 CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council/Financial Commission Joint Work Session was called to order by Mayor Elliott at 6:30 p.m. The meeting was conducted via Zoom. Mayor Elliott thanked everybody who took the time to join this very important meeting. He added the City faces grave economic challenges as a community and as individual households. He noted there is an eviction moratorium at the State level, and mortgage forbearance program for federally backed loans, with private lenders extending the same courtesy to mortgage holders. He stressed the importance of crafting a budget that acknowledges these realities. ROLL CALL Present were Mayor Mike Elliott and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence-Anderson and Dan Ryan. Also present were Financial Commissioners Teneshia Kregness, David Dwapu, Dean Van Der Werf, Taofeek Ishola and Emmanuel Kpaleh. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Finance Director Mark Ebensteiner, Community Development Director Meg Beekman, and City Clerk Barb Suciu. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There was a motion by Councilmember Ryan and seconded by Councilmember Butler to approve the agenda as submitted. The motion passed. INTRODUCTIONS Councilmember Dan Ryan stated he is in his 14th year of service on the City Council. Councilmember April Graves stated this is her 6th year on the City Council. Councilmember Marquita Butler stated this is her 4th year on the City Council. Councilmember Kris Lawrence- Anderson stated this is her 8th year on the City Council. Commissioner Teneshia Kregness stated she has served on the Financial Commission for 10 years. Commissioner David Dwapu stated this is his 2nd year on the Financial Commission. Commissioner Taofeek Ishola stated this is his 1st year on the Financial Commission. Councilmember Kpaleh stated this is his 2nd meeting. Commissioner Dean Van Der Werf stated he has served on the Financial Commission since 2011. OPERATING BUDGET VALUES DEVELOPMENT Mayor Elliott stated this is the second budget meeting, and this meeting will focus on the operating budget. City Manager Curt Boganey stated City Staff is seeking the City Council and Financial Commission’s input and policy direction for the budget. He added he hopes there will be consensus 8/03/2020 Page 2 around the City’s values for ongoing service needs, values related to strategic priorities, and values related to issues of tax and fee burden for residents and customers. BUDGET APPROVAL PROCESS AND TIMELINE Mr. Boganey stated the preliminary levy limit is required by State statute to be approved by the City Council no later than September 30, 2020. The City Council is also required to hold a public hearing on the preliminary budget and proposed levy between November 25 and 28, 2020, and approve certification of the final budget and levy on or before December 28, 2020. BUDGETARY CONDITIONS OVERVIEW Mr. Boganey stated this presentation will focus on the City’s General Fund, which receives 75% of its revenue from property tax; 8% from Local Government Aid (LGA); 7% from lodging and other taxes; and 5% from licenses and permits. He added the City is anticipating LGA of $2.2 million in 2021, with 50% reserved for capital funding and 50% for general operations. Mr. Boganey stated an increase in the debt service levy of approximately $86,000 is anticipated to help fund the City’s share of the neighborhood street reconstruction program, and those bonds have already been sold. He added an additional $220,000 is needed over the next 2 years, and $195,000 for 2024, to continue with the neighborhood street reconstruction program. Mr. Boganey stated the general levy increased from $14.1 million in 2015 to $18 million in 2020. A significant portion of the increase is related to inflation, but the majority of the increases are related to strategic investments that the City has made over this time period. These investments include youth development through Brooklyn Bridge Alliance and BrookLynk; expansion of City communications; and Community Engagement staffing. In this year’s budget, City Staff anticipated filling a new staff position in Human Resources that would be focused on staff development, specifically in the areas of equity and inclusion practices. These spending increases are in response to the strategic priorities and direction of the City Council. Mr. Boganey stated the general fund levy provides the major revenue source for the general fund, which pays for basic government services: Police, Fire, Code Enforcement, Planning, Zoning, Business Support, Inspections, Streets, Parks, Community Recreation, Elections, Building Maintenance and Administration. He added property taxes make up 75% of the general fund, and a commercial taxable market value of $383 million is anticipated for 2021. He noted this is a 6% increase over last year’s budget and is due to increasing market values. Mr. Boganey stated an industrial taxable market value of approximately $177 million is anticipated, or an 11% increase, and residential market value of approximately $1,541,000,000 or a 5.9% increase. He added the overall taxable market values are expected to increase by 7.1%. Mr. Boganey stated tax capacity, based on a specific formula, is the basis for tax payments. He added the residential share of tax capacity is 51.2% in 2020 and 50.7% in 2021; the commercial share of tax capacity is 25.1% in 2020 and 24.9% in 2021; apartments tax capacity is 12.6% in 2020 and 12.9% in 20201; and industrial tax capacity is 11.1% in 2020 and 11.5% in 2021. Mr. Boganey noted residential properties will pay less of the levy share and the median residential property value will increase to $207,000 in 2021. 8/03/2020 Page 3 Mr. Boganey stated a 3-5% increase in utility fees is anticipated as bond payments will need to be made in 2021 to fund utility improvements. Mr. Boganey stated it is anticipated that 2020 taxes will not be paid at the same rate as they have been historically, due to the pandemic. He added the general fund shortfall was originally expected to be over $2 million, but the good news is that the shortfall is now anticipated to be closer to $1.1 million. He noted City Staff have made efforts to reduce budgeted costs in the general fund budget, and an allocation of $2.4 million was received from the federal government to offset Covid-related costs. Mr. Boganey stated TIF District #3 is scheduled for decertification in 2021, which will result in an increase in taxable market value of nearly 10% in 2022. The City will have the opportunity to reduce tax rates overall by 2023 and generate revenue at a higher rate. Additionally, the City’s current franchise agreements will expire in 2023, creating an opportunity for renegotiation. Bond replacement and special assessments can be significantly reduced, and the costs covered with renegotiated franchise fees. Mayor Elliott stated it would be helpful if the slide presentation had footnotes that indicate the data source. He added, for example, he would like to have information about projections for commercial and residential property taxes, and about market value forecasts. He asked whether the forecasts for property market values is based on the change in property values from 2018-2019, or 2019-2020. Mr. Boganey stated values for taxation lag by 1 year, so residents will pay taxes on the value of properties last year. Mayor Elliott stated he was asking how the change is calculated, and whether it is a forecasted change. Finance Director Mark Ebensteiner stated the term “forecast” is not used by Hennepin County, but rather they go through a process of evaluating properties to set taxes to be collected in 2021. The values are already set by the county for each of the property classifications. Mayor Elliott asked whether the County bases their projects on the previous year. Mr. Boganey stated it is not a projection, but rather a valuation, that is based on data previous to January 2, 2020. Mayor Elliott stated where he is going with this is that what happened before January 2, 2020 is very different from what happened after January 2, 2020. He added the question is what budgetary implications do these projections have for Brooklyn Center, as they are not reflective of the reality of 2020. Mr. Boganey stated the County’s valuations are part of a formula, and they are not projections. The property valuations are established on January 2, 2020 and do not reflect how property values will change in the coming year. Mayor Elliott asked whether it is reasonable to assume that the County increases valuations when market conditions improve and decreases valuations when market conditions worsen. He added this 8/03/2020 Page 4 would include overall market conditions, the health of the economy, and people’s ability to pay taxes. Mr. Boganey stated there is not an attempt on the part of the assessor to determine anybody’s ability to pay. Mayor Elliott stated he knows that, but as a general economic condition, evaluations rise and fall based on the general population’s ability to pay. Mr. Boganey stated the levy, in the state of Minnesota, is established by the City Council, and the City Council has the authority to establish and take into account people’s ability to pay. Commissioner Kpaleh stated he understands property values are based on the County’s valuations. He added, with this situation the country is now facing, the market is going down, and people are losing their jobs. He asked whether values can be withheld for a period of time, so people can adjust to this kind of situation, or whether they have to go up. Mr. Boganey stated the City has very limited control over what the valuations are going to be. He added property value is determined by the County Assessor, using sales data and other variables to determine how much each property is worth, as of January 2, 2020. He noted the City must accept that information to determine tax capacity that will be used in the following year’s budget. Mr. Boganey stated the City Council has the authority to decide how much taxes they want to collect from property owners. He noted that is a different decision than determining property values. Community Development Director Meg Beekman stated generally speaking, property values are not tied to property taxes. She added the levy, rather than property valuations, have an impact on how much residents pay. She noted, as an economic development tool, the residential tax burden decreases in cities that have a higher percentage of commercial and industrial tax bases. DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OVERVIEW Mr. Boganey stated Brooklyn Center has historically experienced higher unemployment than Hennepin County. He added the City currently has the highest gap since 1990, with unemployment at 13.5% in Brooklyn Center and 10.3% in Hennepin County. He noted single family home sales are strong, with the average home sale price in June at $225,000, representing a 12% increase over a 12- month period. Mr. Boganey stated a recent survey of local landlords showed that 16 of 61 landlords said they have tenants who cannot pay rent, while 37 landlords said that fewer than 5% of renters struggled to pay rent. He added 56% of the landlords reported that they have been able to work something out with their renters. Mayor Elliott asked whether this was a local landlord survey. He added he does not understand the data points. Mr. Boganey stated the deepest impact of the current recession is likely to occur in 2020 and early in 2021, based on the status of federal stimulus legislation and conditions related to the pandemic. He added CEAP has been providing hundreds of thousands of dollars for rent assistance. He noted 8/03/2020 Page 5 many groups are affected differently, as 1 out of 2 black Minnesotans have applied for unemployment, compared to 1 in 4 white Minnesotans. City Staff believes Brooklyn Center is likely to be more affected by the recession than other communities. Mayor Elliott stated the City has a lot of naturally occurring affordable housing, as opposed to legally binding affordable units. He added this affordability is an economic competitive advantage. He noted it is important to understand how tenuous the affordability is in Brooklyn Center. Commissioner Kpaleh stated he is concerned about how apartment owners and renters, as there is no control and they have their own rules. He added the City loses tax income when people move away from Brooklyn Park. He asked whether the City has any control that they can leverage on property owners. He noted, for example, apartment complexes do not allow visitors, and cars will be towed. He asked what the City can do to give rights to tenants so there will be more occupants, and units will not be empty. Mayor Elliott stated Commissioner Kpaleh’s questions for City Staff are whether the City has control over landlords increasing rent, and not allowing visitors to park. Commissioner Kpaleh stated he is not asking about increased rent, but rather severe rules that landlords impose on renters. He added, because of this, people are moving to different cities and the population is decreasing. He asked what can be done to get more people to move to Brooklyn Center and boost the population. Mr. Boganey stated population growth in Brooklyn Center has been significant over the last 5-10 years. He added the City can influence the availability of rental properties by building more units, which is being done, and continues to be done. He noted he agrees that an increase in population can be good for the economy and livability of the City, but Brooklyn Center has not had difficulty in terms of population growth. Mr. Boganey stated, with regard to regulating management of rental properties, the City’s authority is limited as it could be considered discriminatory. He added, however, the city can exercise regulatory authority when it is deemed necessary. Ms. Beekman stated the Community Development staff addresses property issues and license complaints. She added anyone who has a question about a specific property can contact City Staff and it can be addressed separately. Ms. Beekman stated City Staff is undertaking a review of tenant protections within City Ordinance, in an effort to strengthen a tenant protection Ordinance adopted in 2019. She added cities are limited in their authority over landlords. She noted the City Council will be reviewing a naturally occurring affordable housing preservation program, and discussion around mixed income policy. Mr. Boganey asked whether the City Council believes the City should diversify its revenue. He added annual revenue is estimated using objective processes for three-year periods and are reviewed and updated annually to ensure sound appraisal practices. He noted these policies have served the City well over the years. 8/03/2020 Page 6 Councilmember Graves stated she was thinking about community programs that the City Council has supported in recent years, that have been free and open to the public at the Community Center and in Centennial Park. She asked how to continue community engagement as a policy while ensuring that necessary services are provided to those most in need. Mr. Boganey stated that is a great question. He added the policies that are being discussed are goals or best practices, and financially conservative. He noted the City Council has other policy goals that sometimes have to take precedence over certain best practices. Councilmember Ryan stated he appreciates Councilmember Grave’s comments. He added the City Council should shift away from charges and user fees in the interests of equity, especially for recreation programs for low-income families. He noted this will be beneficial for building non- residential tax capacity. Mr. Boganey stated City Staff can take a look at that policy, as policy objectives can be amended based on the goals of the City Council. He added some new language could be added to balance that policy. Councilmember Graves stated she would be interested in seeing that language. COUNCIL VALUES, PRIORITIES AND GOVERNING FOCUS Mr. Boganey reviewed the City’s current policy statements, to assist in developing the City’s budget. He stressed the importance of ensuring that the policy statements are relevant and accurate. City of Brooklyn Center Vision Statement - We envision Brooklyn Center as a thriving, diverse community with a full range of housing, business, cultural and recreational offerings. It is a safe and inclusive place that people of all ages love to call home, and visitors enjoy due to its convenient location and commitment to a healthy environment. City of Brooklyn Center Mission Statement - The mission of the City of Brooklyn Center is to ensure an attractive, clean, safe, and inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust. Mr. Boganey asked whether there is anything in either of these statements that the City Council would view as harmful or problematic to the City of Brooklyn Center for the coming year. He added it is assumed that these policy statements are acceptable unless there is a consensus that they should be changed. Mayor Elliott stated it is too late for him to be engaging in doing mission and vision work. He added this is a process that is built around strategic planning and he will not comment on this as he does not have the energy to go through this right now. He noted there should be a process for reviewing and amending the policy statements. 8/03/2020 Page 7 Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she does not see anything offensive about the mission or vision statements. She added she is not opposed to revisiting these policy statements with the new Mayor at some point. She added, however, she truly believes in both the vision and mission statements that were adopted by previous City Councils. Councilmember Butler asked where this question is coming from, regarding whether the policy statements are harmful or problematic. She added the mission statement was adopted four years ago, during her tenure. Mr. Boganey stated the City’s budget should reflect the adopted values of the City Council. Councilmember Butler stated she is fine with the policy statements and does not have any questions or comments, nor does she feel that they are harmful. Councilmember Ryan stated he is fine with the mission and vision statements, as well as the stated values and strategic priorities. He added the priorities stated within them provide sufficient flexibility to rise to the challenges that are being discussed tonight. Councilmember Graves stated she does not find the policy statements problematic at all. She added they are really just statements about what the City Council wants to focus on, and how to support the community. She noted they are well-crafted, inclusive and wholistic. Councilmember Graves stated the real challenge is what the values will mean in the budget; how the City interacts with community members and business owners; and how quickly and efficiently the City implements these values. Mayor Elliott stated there is a lot of value in the policy statements as they are ow. He added the City Council should review them in a few years as a matter of practice, based on current conditions within Brooklyn Center. Mr. Boganey asked the City Council would consider customer service and operational excellence as important values. Councilmember Graves confirmed this, adding she has no objections. Mr. Boganey asked whether the City Council supports the six strategic priorities under which the City has operated for the past four years: enhanced community image; residential economic stability; inclusive community engagement; targeted redevelopment; safety, security and stability; and key transportation investments. Mayor Elliott stated he believes these strategic priorities need to be adjusted, but not at tonight’s meeting. Councilmember Graves asked whether Mayor Elliott can provide a few points for discussion. 8/03/2020 Page 8 Mayor Elliott stated he is not prepared to do that tonight, as the facilitative process is not in place. He added he does not believe the six strategic priorities listed by Mr. Boganey are priorities of the current City Council and they should be reviewed. Councilmember Graves stated she looks forward to that discussion, as she agrees they should be reviewed. She added, however, she does not believe any of them are harmful, but maybe the wording can be reviewed. She added she has been involved in two strategic priority reviews in her 6 years on the City Council. She noted another review was starting when the Mayor was appointed. Councilmember Graves stated she would find it helpful to have a breakdown of the budget that shows how much money is being spent in each of the priorities. She added several priorities will overlap within City enterprises, and some will depend upon the market. She noted, other than that, she is fine with moving forward and having a discussion on this issue when time permits. Mayor Elliott stated he agrees that budgetary breakdowns would be helpful. He added he would also like to see measurable goals attached to strategic priorities. Councilmember Graves stated there are measurable goals, they are just not included in the Staff presentation. Mr. Boganey stated City Staff was working on an electronic report that could be generated upon request on a quarterly basis. He added this work was being done before the pandemic. He noted City Staff can continue to work on that and provide it more frequently if needed. Mr. Boganey stated each of the 6 strategic priorities are important, but it would be helpful in preparing the budget to get City Council direction on whether any priorities merit greater emphasis or resources. He added City Staff could include that information in the budget. Councilmember Graves stated resident economic stability will be a very important focus, given the current context of what’s going on in society and in the City. She added safe, secure and stable community is also important. She noted, however, she does not want that to come across as increased policing. She stressed the importance of continuing to increase community engagement, to implement priorities in an effective and sustainable way. Mayor Elliott agreed those are the two most important areas of focus. He added the City should invest in housing assistance as well as food and social service aid. He noted the City should make substantial budget allocations to those areas, which may mean making choices. Councilmember Ryan stated he agrees with Councilmember Grave’s assessment that residential economic stability, a safe secure community, and community engagement are the three priorities. Councilmember Butler agreed. Commissioner Kpaleh requested consideration of having a redevelopment process. He added there are a lot of vacant buildings in the City. He asked whether there is anything the City can do in the future to fill the vacant buildings and increase redevelopment in the City. 8/03/2020 Page 9 Mr. Boganey stated targeted redevelopment has been a priority in Brooklyn Center for many years. He added the Community Development Director works actively with developers and other parties to look for ways to support redevelopment. He noted the City has had success with a number of projects in progress, including Jerry’s Food site, Brooklyn Boulevard reconstruction project, single family homes on 252, and housing proposals on 2 different sites on Brooklyn Boulevard. Mr. Boganey stated he would be happy to schedule a separate conversation with Commissioner Kpaleh to review redevelopment activities and provide additional information. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson thanked City Staff and the City Manager for all their hard work on behalf of the residents of Brooklyn Center. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated residential economic security is a key point, and a safe and secure community is paramount. She added she supports assistance for all of the City’s businesses, not just start-ups and entrepreneurs. She noted all local businesses help the community by generating tax revenue. She noted safety is critical. Mayor Elliott stated the City Council has identified resident economic stability and a secure, stable community as two priorities, but probably does not agree on what that means, as they are broad categories with a myriad of programs and solutions. He added, in terms of resident economic stability, there should be money in the budget to support mortgage and rental assistance, as well as assistance for nonprofit organizations that sustain residents in times of great unemployment and economic crisis. Mayor Elliott stated housing and food security and mental health issues are a crucial part of a safe, secure community. He added the City Council must grapple with the meaning of a safe, secure and stable community, and what meaningful adjustments are required within the budget to achieve it. Mayor Elliott stated the City Council is already committed to addressing these issues but should also specifically name the issues of racial justice, economic justice and addressing disparities within the community. Mr. Boganey asked what outcomes residents should be expected to experience next year for the City Council to feel that the City has been successful in making meaningful progress toward achieving priorities. Mayor Elliott stated historical data should be reviewed to have a baseline around evictions and foreclosure rates. He stressed the importance of keeping those rates low, however that is defined. Councilmember Graves stated she agrees a baseline would be helpful. She added the City would need to work in collaboration with Hennepin County as they already provide rental assistance, although not necessarily for homeowners. She noted she would not want to see a foreclosure problem, although that is how she was able to buy her home in Brooklyn Center. 8/03/2020 Page 10 Councilmember Graves stated she would like to see an increase in the area of preventative programming initiatives within the Police Department budget. She added all of these strategic priorities are connected. She noted economic stability could mean support for businesses, homeowners and educational establishments that need financial assistance. Councilmember Graves stated there is a report in the meeting packet that shows details about residents who live below the poverty line, and what kind of households. She stressed the importance of being intentional about outreach and community engagement by getting ideas about tailoring support to what residents say works for them. The City should listen to the community and respond to that. Mayor Elliott stated support for small businesses and micro-preneurs is extremely important. Mr. Boganey requested input from the City Council regarding what they would like to see within the two strategic priority areas, to feel that the budget was successful. Councilmember Graves stated she supports consideration of strategic priorities from a public health perspective, with regard to the public health crises of racism and Covid-19, as well as mental health issues. She stressed the importance of being intentional with implementation of environmental, mental, physical, emotional and spiritual well-being initiatives within those priorities, which would be a successful outcome. Mr. Boganey quickly reviewed slides showing City Department goals, including CARS, Customer Service, Marketing, Community Development, the Fire Department, Finance, Police Department, and Public Works. Mayor Elliott requested that these slides be reviewed again at the next meeting. He added it is important to know more about departmental goals. Mr. Boganey agreed. Councilmember Graves stated domestic violence and reduction in youth crime, and overall crime, are important goals. She added the Police Department needs to have a goal around community accountability and transparency. She noted Police Chief Gannon is already working on this, but it should be a very specific goal stated in the strategic priorities. Mayor Elliott stated he would like to schedule another meeting to continue this discussion. He requested input from the City Council and Financial Commission regarding holding a meeting on Thursday or Friday of this week, August 6 or 7, 2020. Mr. Boganey stated the meeting could be a 90-minute meeting to address departmental goals and tax burden expectations. Councilmember Graves stated she is not available to join the meeting either Thursday or Friday due to a prior commitment. She added she can review the materials submit comments to City Staff before the meeting. 8/03/2020 Page 11 There was a majority Consensus of the City Council and Financial Commissioners to hold a follow- up Work Session on Friday, August 7, 2020 at 6:30 p.m. Mr. Boganey stated the meeting would be approximately 90 minutes. He agreed to send meeting packets ahead of time for advanced preparation. Councilmember Graves requested that any items that require Consensus from the City Council be included in the information that City Staff sends to her prior to Friday’s meeting. Mr. Boganey agreed. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Graves and seconded by Councilmember Ryan to adjourn the meeting at 9:21 p.m. The motion passed. MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/FINANCIAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND STATE OF MINNESOTA JOINT WORK SESSION AUGUST 7, 2020 CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council/Financial Commission Joint Work Session was called to order by Mayor Elliott at 6:30 p.m. The meeting was conducted via Webex. ROLL CALL Present were Mayor Mike Elliott and Councilmembers Marquita Butler and Dan Ryan. Councilmembers April Graves and Kris Lawrence-Anderson were absent and excused. Also present were Financial Commissioners Teneshia Kregness and Dean Van Der Werf. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey and City Clerk Barb Suciu. INTRODUCTION Mayor Elliott stated tonight’s meeting is the continuation of a Work Session focused on the City’s Operating Budget. The City Council’s role is to inform and instruct the City Manager to craft a budget that reflects the City Council’s goals and priorities, current realities and the needs of the community. He added City Council feedback and comments will be requested regarding the City’s departmental goals, budgets and programs. 2020 DEPARTMENT GOALS Mr. Boganey stated the focus of this evening’s meeting is Department goals. He added it would be better to address maximum levies and fees with the full City Council present. He added the Agenda Item related to CIP is a continuation of the City Council’s discussion a few weeks ago, which can be postponed. He reviewed a presentation providing context and background on each of the City Departments. Mr. Boganey stated the departmental goals reviewed in this presentation were established for 2020. The City Council is requested to provide feedback and comments as well as requests or expectations for other goals that should be reflected in the 2021 budget. He reviewed the City’s departmental goals for 2020. Administration -fostering a culture of inclusion and inclusive engagement -Systematic administrative approaches across the organization to achieve customer service goals that account for gender equity in the hiring process Community Activities, Recreation and Services (CARS) – government buildings, recreation, the community center, Earle Brown Heritage Center, and Centerbrook Golf Course. -Continued improvements in customer service for all functions -Enhanced internal and external marketing efforts for all divisions 8/07/2020 Page 2 Community Development - Building construction regulation, rental licensing, property maintenance, Code enforcement, housing programs, planning and zoning, redevelopment, long range strategic, Economic Development Authority (EDA), business retention, and workforce development. -Preserve and enhance quality of life for residents and businesses in Brooklyn Center by guiding development with effective measures Fire Department – Administration, fire prevention, operations, training, and emergency management. -To protect lives and property during emergencies -Enrich the community by providing non-emergency services focused on safety and prevention -Achieve 9-minute response time for 15 firefighters for structure fires -NFPA Standard 1720 goals reached 90% of the time -Confine a fire to room of origin at least 75% of the time Finance Department – Finance staff, utility billing, municipal liquor store. Finance Department Mission is to provide accurate and timely information to all users of financial information; provide administrative and professional support in financial matters to all City Departments. -Ensure financial stability of the City -Enhance customer access to utility account information and actions Police Department – Vision: committed to helping provide an exceptionally safe and secure community for residents, businesses and visitors, with great dignity and respect. Mission: to protect and serve in a manner that preserves the public trust. -Reduce domestic violence -Reduce youth crime -Reduce crime in general Mayor Elliott asked if the Police Department has indicated how they are going to achieve this, and whether these are their current goals. Mr. Boganey stated there is some discussion about methods in the budget narrative. He confirmed these are the Police Department’s 2020 goals. Public Works – Mission: Ensure maintenance and operations of City’s infrastructure and facilities in a quality and cost-effective manner. -Meet or exceed minimum infrastructure maintenance standards -PASER pavement management -Continue to improve streamlined management strategies and techniques, using refined methods and technologies CITY COUNCIL FEEDBACK ON DEPARTMENTAL GOALS Mr. Boganey requested the City Council’s consideration regarding items that they believe should be included in the 2021 budget for the City to be successful. He stressed the importance of considering outcome and results, rather than how something should be done. He added City Staff is capable in their ability to do research and analysis, and provide approaches, strategies and methods. He noted the City Council has probably heard of projects or tactics being used by other communities, that they may want City Staff to be aware of. 8/07/2020 Page 3 Mr. Boganey stated Councilmember Graves provided her comments which have already been incorporated into a working document. Mayor Elliott stated he would like to get feedback and comments from the rest of the City Council before reviewing Councilmember Grave’s comments. Mr. Boganey stated Councilmember Grave’s comments have already been added to the document. He added however Mayor Elliott wants to proceed is fine. Administration Mr. Boganey stated the Administration Department includes Human Resources, City Clerk’s office, City Manager’s office, elections, IT, the receptionist, and strategic leadership for the organization as a whole. Many of the Administration Department’s 2020 goals will carry over to 2021. Mayor Elliott stated, in addition to gender equity, there should be focus on the overall diverse makeup of the City in hiring practices. Councilmember Ryan stated that has already been a key goal for many years, under Administration and in other departments. He added he believes it is entirely appropriate. Councilmember Butler agreed, adding the City’s overall hiring process should reflect the racial and gender make-up of the community. She added it is not just about who people see in City Hall, but also who they see out in the community. Mr. Boganey asked whether gender equity should stay on the list of goals. Mayor Elliott stated gender equity stays on the list, as well as reflecting the overall diversity of the community. He added those two goals should rise to the top. Councilmember Ryan stated communication and community education are especially important during the pandemic and related economic crisis. He added it is essential that residents are kept informed of what the government is doing, and he is glad there are qualified City Staff who are assigned to communication duties. He noted it has always been a challenge to keep residents informed and engaged. Financial Commission Chair Teneshia Kregness expressed the importance of ensuring equity by setting limits and requirements for progress. Mayor Elliott stated it is important for goals to remain general yet specific. He added he agrees equity is an important goal, but it should also be called out and named, so it gets the attention it needs. He noted that applies to both gender and racial justice equity. CARS – Community Activities, Recreation and Services Mr. Boganey reviewed Councilmember Graves’ comments: “Increased cultural competency of employees and programmatic offerings; explore potential mental health issues relevant to the community.” 8/07/2020 Page 4 Mr. Boganey stated CARS provides a variety of high-quality, inclusive programs and services. He added the goal for government buildings is quality, efficient service and a clean, healthy environment in which people can work and do recreational activities, providing health and leisure benefits to all residents. Councilmember Butler stated it will be necessary to be innovative and diversify the City’s current recreational program offerings. She added it is not known when Covid will go away, and whether things will return to normal. She noted virtual programming will be an area that will continue to grow and become more important, and the City should be innovative and creative with technology, creating programs for residents that are beneficial and safe. She added, for instance, there is an activity kit that residents can pick up to take home. Councilmember Butler stated that should be a CARS goal, to continue to be creative and diversify the City’s recreational offerings. Mayor Elliott stated he agrees with that goal 100%. He added families and kids are unable to connect with each other, and many do not have internet access, which is a unique challenge faced by the community. He noted a recent Star Tribune article referenced Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park as communities that have been most negatively affected the most by Covid-19 in the Twin Cities area. Mayor Elliott stated it will take real effort for Brooklyn Center to meet the challenges it faces - financial, economic, health-related, and education-related. He added this is a wholistic crisis. Mayor Elliott stated, from a public health standpoint, Brooklyn Center is in the “center” of the pandemic, with its harsh realities and negative impacts. He added there will be a great financial burden on the community. He noted The City Council will need to focus on each of the goals to find balance and prioritize, as the City has limited resources, and residents have a limited capacity to pay taxes. He agreed with Councilmember Butler’s statements, adding innovation is the key to reaching kids and families and getting them through this time. Councilmember Ryan stated the idea of new virtual programming is innovative, but the real challenge will be residents without internet access, and how to deal with that. He added the mental health aspect of CARS is open-ended, and Councilmember Graves has background and expertise in that area. City Staff should be supported and encouraged to seek partnerships with the County, as they are already working on some of these initiatives. The City can work with the County to identify residents who need support services. Mayor Elliott stated there is a trail system in Brooklyn Center that might be used for recreational programs for residents who are unable to use the Community Center. He added this would be a way of bringing recreation to residents. He noted CARS could play a role by getting information out to residents, promoting programs, and encouraging people to use the City’s outdoor spaces. Community Development 8/07/2020 Page 5 Mr. Boganey reviewed Councilmember Graves’ comments: “Establish and implement a workforce development program in collaboration with City departments, multi-jurisdictional partners, and community organizations.” Mayor Elliott stated there should be significant investments in housing assistance including rental and mortgage assistance. He added loans should be made available for small to mid-sized businesses, especially micro entrepreneurs. He noted significant financial investment is required to support food shelves like CEAP and CAPI, and other nonprofit organizations that are helping to fill the gap and sustain people. Mayor Elliott stated the City must invest in child-care systems. He added this could go under the City Council budget, including funding to hire experts or consultants that can assist with evaluating best practices around the reforms that the City Council is putting into place. He noted he understands this is not one of the areas that is being reviewed tonight. Councilmember Ryan stated “reforms” is a general term. He asked whether Mayor Elliott can be more specific. Mayor Elliott stated the City Council had conversations before George Floyd’s murder about public safety and policing in Brooklyn Center. He added some policies may be adopted out of those conversations, and it would be helpful to have external resources and experts in that type of work to provide advice about completing strategic policy work to improve public safety in Brooklyn Center. Councilmember Ryan stated Police Chief Gannon gave a presentation to the City Council on the results and recommendations of the Ellison and Harrington Police Use of Force report. He added Chief Gannon was supportive of those reforms. He asked whether Mayor Elliott is not satisfied with the advice and expertise of the Police Department, and why he would want additional outside expertise. Councilmember Ryan stated a 2007 study completed by the Professional Law Enforcement Research Federation addressed challenges faced by cities and counties with regard to police reform. He added, if this were a normal budget year, he would be fine with Mayor Elliott’s suggestion to hire an outside expert, although he is unsure of the cost. Councilmember Ryan stated Mayor Elliott was previously listing other budget goals that will really stress the City’s limited revenues, although he fully supports some of them. He added the City is experiencing an 80% drop in revenue from hotels, and the governor could potentially un-allocate Local Government Aid. He noted the City will not be in a financial position to hire a new CARS Director for a while. He noted there may be sources that City Staff can use to enhance the recommendations of the Police Chief. He expressed his skepticism at the idea of adding another position, if it can be avoided. Mayor Elliott stated he appreciates that. He added he is always speaking about having a lean budget, and he has stressed the importance of striking a balance between community needs and people’s ability to pay taxes, which has decreased. He noted it is incredibly important to have the resources to be able to do that. 8/07/2020 Page 6 Councilmember Ryan stated the City Council agrees there is a trust deficit within a subset of the community. He added trust is a gold standard, and the City must continue to be transparent and accountable. He noted it may take time to see whether new legislation is effective. Councilmember Ryan stated, in a recent presentation, Police Chief Tim Gannon made the point that the Police Department’s procedures exceed the standards set by the POST Board and in State statute. He added Police Department employees are committed to a higher standard for policing, continued work toward expanded community engagement, and renewed efforts to listen to all voices. He noted time is limited this evening, but this can be re-visited, and he would like to leave it as a question mark. Councilmember Ryan stated support for food shelves, and ensuring food security, is at the top of his list. He added he spoke with the Director of CEAP about the importance of ensuring that there is no gap in providing food security, related to both City support and foundations that provide funding to food shelves. He noted housing assistance is more problematic, as the State will not be in a good place financially to meet these demands if the economic situation continues to decline. He expressed the importance of residential financial assistance at the federal level. Mr. Boganey stated it would be preferable if the City Council could articulate desired results in specific areas, as opposed to how-to recommendations. He added that will free up staff to focus on various options. He noted, for instance, funding food shelves is one way to address the need for food security, but the goal is food security as opposed to how the City Council thinks the need should be addressed. Mr. Boganey stated City Staff are open to all suggestions and ideas, and all options will be evaluated. He stressed the importance of identifying outcomes that the City Council is seeking. Mayor Elliott stated these outcomes are all related to economic stability. He added, for instance child-care assistance is especially important for residents who are health care workers, faced with the additional burden of supporting and sustaining the community. He noted food security and housing assistance are broader goals, and support allocations from the City’s resources, however modest it would be, is extremely important, keeping in mind the financial constraints the City is facing. Mayor Elliott stated he has always advocated for as lean a budget as possible. He added he is still very much tuned in to that goal and objective. He added Brooklyn Center is one of the hardest hit communities in this health and financial crisis and will be required to take actions that have never before been taken. He noted this includes investing in outside resources to assist with doing the work around public safety, racial equity and justice. He noted this is not a question mark for him. Mayor Elliott stated this is an investment that the City of Brooklyn Center must make, especially right now, just a few months after the brutal murder of George Floyd. He added these recent events have had all of us looking at how to improve public safety in the community. Councilmember Ryan stated he is fine with that and looks forward to City Staff’s recommendations for how to get the desired results. 8/07/2020 Page 7 Mayor Elliott stated these improvements would include increasing transparency and access to data regarding stops, complaints, and other pertinent data related to public safety. He added this would also include a commitment to implement reforms to improve public safety. Mr. Boganey asked Mayor Elliott for clarification in terms of the types of outcomes he would expect for improving public safety. Mayor Elliott stated improved public safety is the goal. He added there are some key indicators that the City Council should review. Mr. Boganey requested that Mayor Elliott send him an email with more information on these two issues he referenced: public safety and emergency management plan. Mayor Elliott stated they could schedule some time to have a discussion. Councilmember Butler stated she agrees with the comments of Mayor Elliott and notes from Councilmember Graves and has no additional comments. Mr. Boganey stated his goal is to share this feedback with City Staff and have a review of the outcomes to identify effective strategies to achieve the outcomes. He added City Staff will do their best to associate a cost estimate with the outcomes and include strategies and costs as part of the preliminary budget. He noted he anticipates the preliminary budget will be multiple budgets showing the costs of a balanced budget, and whether the tax burden is reasonable, or higher than what the City Council is willing or prepared to pay. Mayor Elliott stated many City Councils typically have a Budget Committee to work on this process. He added that might be something Brooklyn Center should consider. He noted it might be helpful to have assessments to review when appropriately sizing the budget to meet residents’ ability to carry a certain tax levy. Mr. Boganey stated City Staff will hopefully be able to provide performance measurements related to these goals and expectations, to know what success would look like for 2021 in some of these areas, and determine at the end of the year whether the performance objectives have been achieved. Mayor Elliott stated the rest of tonight’s agenda will be addressed at a future meeting. He thanked the meeting attendees for their commitment to this process and working together to come up with the best possible budget for Brooklyn Center. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Ryan and seconded by Councilmember Butler to adjourn the meeting at 8:14 p.m. The motion passed. 08/10/20 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION AUGUST 10, 2020 CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session called to order by Mayor Mike Elliott at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was conducted via Zoom. ROLL CALL Mayor Mike Elliott and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence- Anderson, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, City Clerk Barb Suciu, and City Attorney Troy Gilchrist. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF AGENDA ITEMS AND QUESTIONS Mayor Elliott stated the meeting started off on an unfortunate note. He added there is a short agenda for tonight’s Regular Session meeting. MISCELLANEOUS There were no miscellaneous items. DISCUSSION OF WORK SESSION AGENDA ITEMS AS TIME PERMITS ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP, LITTER AND TRASH NUISANCE City Manager Curt Boganey stated the City Council received a report on this item at their last meeting, but there was not sufficient time to complete the discussion. Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards reviewed a staff presentation, beginning where the discussion ended at the last meeting. He stated there have been several discussions over the years regarding this subject. He added City Staff are prepared to take action to implement a plan to address trash and litter, and truly solve the problem. He noted Community Development Director Meg Beekman will provide a review of potential initiatives to move toward a long-term solution. Dr. Edwards stated the issue of trash and litter in the City’s public areas has become more of a problem recently, with residents getting outside into the City’s parks and outdoor areas and leaving more trash than usual. He added City Staff were prepared to address this issue before the pandemic, which shut down their efforts. He noted there is an acute problem right now, not only in business and commercial districts, but also parks and other areas of the City. 08/10/20 -2- DRAFT Dr. Edwards stated while obviously trash and litter are the main problem, it is also important to consider what is the mindset that people have when they throw trash on the ground, and not in trash cans. He added City Staff are considering interventions similar to the shopping cart issue, where shoppers leave their carts at the transit stop and businesses are required to collect them. He noted disrupting the pattern of littering is the best way to address the problem and create change. Dr. Edwards stated City employees can be assigned to pick up trash, and extra staff can be hired. He added this solution assumes that the core problem is people littering, and not necessarily businesses cleaning up their sites. He noted businesses and the transit hub are not the cause of the litter. Dr. Edwards stated the City can be aesthetically pleasing and free of litter with the right approach. He added there are many places that have more people and more businesses than Brooklyn Center, where litter is not a problem. He noted there are a few ways to achieve this same level of cleanliness. Community Development Director Meg Beekman stated there has been an uptick in the amount of litter and more comments from local businesses about litter on their property. She added the City has allocated more staff time to cleaning up properties, and this could continue if Code Enforcement staff are assigned away from residential duties. She noted many commercial businesses are focused on their business and not on what is happening in their parking lot. Ms. Beekman stated Ordinance amendments can be considered, that would provide an emergency abatement process, although this is considered a punitive approach. She added most businesses are not opposed to making positive change when it is pointed out to them, and enforcement is a tool that is available. She noted the abatement process takes time, and by the time it is enforced, the litter might be gone, but new litter may have taken its place. Ms. Beekman stated City Staff considered a shopping cart Ordinance, similar to the one in the City of Minneapolis, in which shopping carts are picked up, and a fee is required to be paid to get them back. She added the Public Works Department picks up shopping carts on a daily basis. She noted City Staff have considered addressing this issue by expanding contracts that are in place for maintenance of EDA-owned properties, or other staff-led clean-up efforts. Ms. Beekman stated these efforts can have a negative effect, as businesses begin to expect that type of clean-up service from the City. She added emergency clean-up situations are often managed by City Staff, and that is something that could be considered. Ms. Beekman stated City Staff are reviewing a potential safety/security matching grant to offset improvement costs, which could be expanded to include beautification and litter cleanup. She added, through such a program, the City can offset businesses’ costs for purchase of trash receptacles or putting together a pick-up program. Dr. Edwards stated, from a long-term perspective, the process of preventing people from littering should be considered. He added people should be encouraged to view public places with pride, and keep them clean, and not put trash on the ground. He noted, if trash does get on the ground, 08/10/20 -3- DRAFT the City should consider how it can be quickly collected to keep public areas clean and reinforce that sense of pride. Dr. Edwards stated this issue was being reviewed by City Staff before the pandemic. He added the goal is for residents to have respect and pride in their public spaces. He added City Staff was considering a Beautification Commission that would partner with local businesses, develop a relationship with them through communication and support to ensure that clean-up is sustainable. He noted businesses, residents and the City are all part of the solution in instituting a successful litter education campaign, that will include signage, messaging, decorating trash cans, expressing pride of place. Businesses will be required to create a beautification plan that may be accompanied by a grant of some kind. Dr. Edwards stated City Staff proposes that businesses are required to form clean-up districts with resources to fund staff and equipment to clean areas on a regular basis. He added the other approach is creation of a tax district with a fee that businesses pay to have the City hire staff to clean regularly, in partnership with business districts. He noted this was being planned, and meetings organized with local businesses before the pandemic, and this strategy would require a structured agreement and an investment program. Dr. Edwards stated groups of City residents volunteer to do clean-up events, but these strategies would provide regular clean-up in a more robust way. He added City Staff believes that a combination of strategies, getting to the root cause of the problem and providing potential solutions will address the trash and litter issue in the City’s business areas. Dr. Edwards asked whether the City Council has any thoughts or ideas of short-term solutions in areas that require immediate clean-up, that would overlap with long-term strategies. Councilmember Butler thanked City Staff for taking the time to research this issue and put the presentation together. She stated this is an issue about which she is very passionate, and she feels it is important to improve this in the City. She added this has been an issue for a very long time, she has been complaining about it, and sending photos to Mr. Boganey, during the whole time that she was has been on the City Council. She stressed the importance of being careful about what type of narrative is created on this issue by City Staff. Councilmember Butler stated many other cities are dealing with this same problem and are handling it a lot better. She added, for instance, she shops in Crystal, and she has seen Target employees at different times of the day out in their parking lot, cleaning up trash. She noted she does not think it is a good idea to use City Staff time and resources to clean up businesses’ parking lots, as that is essentially giving them a crutch. Councilmember Butler stated Brooklyn Center’s homeowners are held accountable for the condition of their property and are assessed a fee if they do not comply. She added businesses should be held to the same standards. She noted, if a citation is issued to a business and they are required to clean up their property, it should not matter if it is old litter, or new litter. 08/10/20 -4- DRAFT Councilmember Butler stated she also takes issue with the statement that business owners are only concerned with what is happening inside their business, and not in the parking lot. She added most business owners do not live in the community, and they do not care about the appearance of the community. She noted the City should hold local businesses more accountable for the state of their property. Councilmember Butler stated the increase in litter and trash in the City’s parks can be at least partially attributed to the pandemic, as more people than usual are using the parks. She added increased park usage and trash in the parks can be attributed to the current situation, but local businesses have been neglecting to clean up their properties for the past 5 years. Councilmember Ryan stated he agrees that businesses should be held accountable in the same way that residential properties are. He added he goes to Cub Foods, and their parking lot is always clean, and there are always employees collecting carts. He noted he has spoken to Cub Foods Manager Paul Jackson, and he is actively aware of and addressing the trash issue in the parking lot. Councilmember Ryan stated the McDonald’s property is always clean as well. He added once a business has that priority, the behavior and diligence will follow. He noted he feels that business leaders should take the lead on whether to pursue special service districts. Discussion of this item continued at the August 10, 2020, Work Session. ADJOURN STUDY SESSION TO INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL Mayor Elliott adjourned the Study Session at 6:52 p.m. 08/10/20 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WORK SESSION AUGUST 10, 2020 CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council/Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Work Session called to order by Mayor/President Mike Elliott at 7:19 p.m. The meeting was conducted via Webex. ROLL CALL Mayor/President Mike Elliott and Councilmembers/Commissioners Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, Public Works Director Doran Cote, City Clerk Barb Suciu, and City Attorney Troy Gilchrist. ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP (LITTER AND TRASH NUISANCE) Cont’d Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards resumed the discussion regarding picking up trash and litter in Brooklyn Center. He requested feedback and comments from the City Council. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves stated, for short-term solutions, she likes the following items in the staff presentation: #1 (additional Code enforcement for commercial businesses), #3 (an Ordinance related to shopping carts) and #5 (beautification incentives). She added 1 and 3 are administrative and staff-focused, while 5 is more of a collaborative approach. She noted she likes the balance of those 3 approaches. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves stated she would support the second strategy related to an educational campaign about litter. She added, although it is important for City Staff to partner with businesses, it may be beneficial to have a Commission at some point. She noted an educational campaign would be more visible and possibly more effective. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves stated prevention measures would be helpful, and she would need to learn more about them. She added she is interested in exploring clean-up actions and business district beautification. She noted she is open to discussing all the measures. Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated she especially likes the Ordinance related to shopping carts, similar to that which is in place in Minneapolis. She added she concurs that businesses should be encouraged to keep their property clean and free of litter. 08/10/20 -2- DRAFT Mayor/President Elliott stated City Staff has done a really great job of putting together some strategies that can have impact in the short and long term. He added there is a consensus around having businesses pay the cost of keeping their properties clean, as opposed to taking the cost on as a City, and he concurs with that, as these are largely businesses that can afford to keep their properties clean. He noted he would like to see additional information about the potential degree of effectiveness of the proposed approaches, for example, a review of the Minneapolis shopping cart Ordinance, to see what impact the Ordinance has had on the problem since it was instituted. Mayor/President Elliott stated he would like more information on the resources that would be required to make these approaches successful. He thanked City Staff for the presentation, which is well thought-out and very promising. Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated she believes the City should take more responsibility for the aesthetic appearance of community gardens and landscaped areas. She added there are areas on 63rd Avenue that are overgrown with weeds, that were supposed to be beautiful gardens, as well as landscaped areas along Brooklyn Boulevard that are not being maintained. She asked whether maintenance of those gardens is the responsibility of the resident, or the City. She noted she would support having the City allocate adequate finance resources to maintain those gardens. Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated this discussion is about taking pride in the community and cleaning up litter on the ground. She added the City’s gardens and landscaped areas are not well-maintained, and that sets the tone and projects an image that the City does not want to convey. She noted she understands there are budget constraints and staffing issues due to COVID-19, but the gardens and landscaped areas should be maintained, or replaced with grass or solid surface. Mayor/President Elliott stated he concurs with Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence- Anderson’s comments, particularly about the flower gardens along the curbs. He added many residents have complained that the City is not taking care of those gardens. Mr. Boganey stated he would like to ask Public Works Director Doran Cote about the rain gardens on 63rd Avenue, and whether they are the responsibility of the City or the resident. He added maintenance of landscaped areas along Brooklyn Boulevard is the City’s responsibility. He noted this has been observed, and maintenance will be increased along Brooklyn Boulevard. He noted the City currently has about one-third of the seasonal staff that is typically hired, but there will be an upgrade in maintenance on Brooklyn Boulevard. Public Works Director Doran Cote stated some residents have adopted the rain gardens and care for them. He added there is a limited number of seasonal staff that also maintain the rain gardens. He added City Staff discussed this issue that morning and committed two seasonal staff and 2 interns to do intense maintenance on Brooklyn Boulevard. Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated a volunteer effort could be launched to maintain parks and landscaped areas, to reduce staff time but also increase community pride. She added she lives on 63rd Avenue, and the neighbors could come together to each spend 15-20 08/10/20 -3- DRAFT minutes a month maintaining the flower gardens and keep them well-groomed. She noted this might be something to consider under the current budgetary constraints. Mr. Boganey agreed, adding he would review at the “adopt a park” program, which was designed for volunteer projects in the parks. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan stated, following up on Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson’s suggestion, he is involved with the Lions Club and they are looking for outdoor service projects as part of their public service activities. He added parks clean-up was one of their ideas, and the “adopt a park” program would be a good way to organize groups and residents of the neighborhoods, and free up staff time to address other common areas that are blighted with litter. Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated church youth groups and other organizations could adopt a particular corner for maintenance and beautification. She added this could be accompanied by a positive media campaign and would be a goodwill gesture within the community. Mr. Boganey stated City Staff will review this issue and report back to the City Council. He added City Staff are reviewing labor-saving equipment that would improve efficiency in parks clean-up. Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated the equipment would probably be helpful for parks maintenance, but the neighborhood gardens and landscaped areas would benefit from volunteers who are willing to pull weeds. Mr. Boganey stated parks maintenance equipment would free up staff time to work on beautification of the City’s landscaped areas. Mayor/President Elliott stated he needs to end the meeting sooner rather than later. He added he is still processing what happened earlier in the meeting, and he needs to step away. He added Councilmember/Commissioner Butler can take over if the rest of the City Council wants to continue this discussion. He noted he would like to schedule another work session to address the Housing policy. Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated the City Council can reschedule so the Mayor/President can weigh in on some of these other issues, including Housing, which is a large issue. She added her preference would be to adjourn the meeting early and reconvene at another date. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan stated he appreciates and respects Mayor/President Elliott’s feelings. He added Mayor/President Elliott should be involved in the remaining discussions that are respectful of each other’s positions. He noted he supports Mayor/President Elliott if he feels the need to step back at this time. Mayor/President Elliott stated he appreciates the comments of Councilmembers/Commissioners Lawrence-Anderson and Ryan. 08/10/20 -4- DRAFT Mayor/President Elliott stated he would like to adjourn the meeting, noting another meeting is scheduled to focus on Housing. Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson requested that the City Council receive a text message from City Staff when a Special Meeting is scheduled. She added this is pursuant to the Special Meeting that was held on Friday, August 7, 2020, of which she was not aware. She apologized for not joining that meeting as she was up north doing maintenance on her property. Mr. Boganey agreed that City Staff can send a text to alert Councilmembers/Commissioners about Special Meetings. He added the City Council set that meeting date and time at their Monday, August 3, 2020 Special Meeting as a continuation. He noted City Staff can send out a text message regardless of whether the meeting was scheduled or not, and also if the meeting time is changed. City Clerk Barb Suciu stated a meeting is scheduled on Friday, August 14, 2020 for canvasing the primary results. Mayor/President Elliott requested that City Staff send a text reminder for that meeting. ADJOURNMENT Mayor/President Elliott moved and Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson seconded adjournment of the City Council/Economic Development Authority Work Session at 8:38 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 08/10/20 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION AUGUST 10, 2020 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor Mike Elliott at 6:45 p.m. The meeting was conducted via Webex. ROLL CALL Mayor Mike Elliott and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence- Anderson, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, City Clerk Barb Suciu, and City Attorney Troy Gilchrist. Mayor Mike Elliott opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum. Joy Anderson, a Brooklyn Center resident, read a letter that she prepared for the City Council. “I spoke a few weeks ago at a City Council meeting about Wi-Fi in the City's parks and the planned pilot in one of the parks. My strong objection is not being heeded. I am very scared about the plans to move forward with Wi-Fi. You call it a pilot in one of the parks, but I believe you are not being honest with your plans. What is the pilot for? We currently have public Wi-Fi in locations, and I suspect the plan is for citywide Wi- Fi, and you are not being honest and forthright. I realize this plan is not coming from our elected City Officials but rather from the City Manager and Deputy City Manager. We cannot make this harmful decision arbitrarily. Our elected officials are not involved in the decision and neither are the citizens that live here. Injecting harmful, artificial energy 24/7 will adversely affect people, nature and animals. It affects the cells of our body and our nervous system. If you inject this energy into the parks, you will remove the beneficial natural energy of nature that heals and restores us. For me personally, you will remove my ability to enjoy the parks. I suspect you do have a bigger plan to have City-wide Wi-Fi, and if that is so, people that are more sensitive and exposed to it 24/7 will become very ill. For me personally, if there were to be City-wide Wi-Fi, I would literally constantly be suffering. I am not alone in this. This is very serious, and I am very scared, and I asked you to stop what you are doing. There are other solutions for internet. I plead with elected officials to take over the Wi- Fi issue and stop it, and to my fellow residents to come forward and talk about this.” Mayor Elliott thanked Ms. Anderson for her comments. 08/10/20 -2- DRAFT Mayor Elliott requested additional discussion on this issue and asked that City Staff come up with a hands-on approach for the City Council to address the issue of Wi-Fi in the parks and in the City. He asked that this issue be added to tonight’s Work Session agenda. Mr. Boganey asked Ms. Anderson whether she can refer him to any sources of information supporting the concept that Wi-Fi is harmful to people’s health. Ms. Anderson stated there is a lot of information on the internet. She added, from personal experience, she knows what Wi-Fi does to her nervous system and her body. She added she is a living example of that. Mr. Boganey thanked Ms. Anderson. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Graves seconded to close the Informal Open Forum at 6:58 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 2. INVOCATION Councilmember Ryan read a quote attributed to John Adams in March 1770 during a trial of British soldiers involved in the Boston Massacre. John Adams defended the British soldiers in the interests of the defense of justice. "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." 3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session called to order by Mayor Mike Elliott at 7:00 p.m. 4. ROLL CALL Mayor Mike Elliott and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence- Anderson, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, City Clerk Barb Suciu, and City Attorney Troy Gilchrist. 5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA 08/10/20 -3- DRAFT Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda, and the following consent items were approved: 6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. July 20, 2020 – Work Session with Financial Commission 2. July 22, 2020 – Work Session 3. July 27, 2020 - Study Session 2. July 27, 2020 – Regular Session 6b. LICENSES Entertainment License Earle Brown Heritage Center 6155 Earle Brown Drive Brooklyn Center, 55430 Hospitality Accommodations License Country Inn & Suites 2550 Freeway Blvd Brooklyn Center, 55430 Mechanical Licenses Aquarius Water Conditioning 3180 County Dr Little Canada, 55117 Comfort Matters 18071 Territorial Rd Maple Grove, 55369 Farr Plumbing 2525 Nevada Ave N Golden Valley, 55427 Master Mechanical 1027 Gemini Rd Eagan, 55121 Van Kirk Heating & Air 4505 Crosstown Blvd Ham Lake, 55304 Intoxicating and Sunday Liquor License Irie Vybz Jamaican Restaurant 6056 Shingle Creek Pkwy Brooklyn Center 55430 RENTAL INITIAL (TYPE II – two-year license) 2403 54th Ave N Brittney Lundeen 6019 Colfax Ave N Alice Teamah Cooper RENEWAL (TYPE III – one-year license) 6018 Camden Ave N Crystal Brummer / Brummer Realty 3007 Ohenry Rd IH3 Property Illinois RENEWAL (TYPE II – two-year license) 3612 Commodore Ave N IH3 Property Illinois LP ‐ missing cpted 08/10/20 -4- DRAFT RENEWAL (TYPE I – three-year license) 3307 63rd Ave N Rosemond Coleman ‐ met requirements 2107 70th Ave N Xiong Lin / Infinite Property 1112 Emerson La Mark Ronea / Bodhi Tree ‐ met requirements 6349 Halifax Dr Qiang Fang 6012 Kyle Ave N James Hager 6900 Newton Ave N FYR SFR Borrower ‐ met requirements 7024 Newton Ave N Troy Phingsten 5712 Northport Dr Cindy & Raymond Scherbing 5836 York Ave N Courtney Thao Tran 5918 Zenith Ave N Traci Austin & Dylan DeMarais 6c. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XX DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE REMOVAL OF DEAD TREES AT CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN BROOKLYN CENTER, MN Motion passed unanimously. 7. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS -None. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS -None. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS -None. 10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS -None. 11. COUNCIL REPORT -None. 12. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Graves moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 7:04 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:8/24/2020 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:C urt Boganey, City Manager T H R O U G H :D r. Reggie Edwards, D eputy C ity M anager BY:A lix Bentrud, D eputy City Clerk S U B J E C T:A pproval of Licens es B ackground: The following bus inesses /persons have applied for C ity licens es as noted. Each bus iness/pers on has fulfilled the requirements of the C ity O rdinance governing respec4ve licens es, s ubmi5ed appropriate applica4ons, and paid proper fees. A pplicants for rental dwelling licens es are in compliance with C hapter 12 of the City Code of O rdinances, unless comments are noted below the property address on the a5ached rental report. Garbage H auler L icense S animax U S A L L C 505 H ardman Ave S S outh S t Paul 55075 AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip4on U pload D ate Type Rental C riteria 7/7/2020 Backup M aterial 8-24-2020 Rentals 8/18/2020 Backup M aterial Page 2 of 2 b.Police Service Calls. Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12-911, and events categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, auto theft and arson. Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the victim and suspect are “Family or household members” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (b) and where there is a report of “Domestic Abuse” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (a). License Category Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Service & Part I Crimes (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category Impact 1-2 0-1 3-4 units 0-0.25 5 or more units 0-0.35 Decrease 1 Category 1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 3-4 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 Categories 1-2 Greater than 3 3-4 units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria License Category (Based on Property Code Only) Number of Units Property Code Violations per Inspected Unit Type I – 3 Year 1-2 units 0-2 3+ units 0-0.75 Type II – 2 Year 1-2 units Greater than 2 but not more than 5 3+ units Greater than 0.75 but not more than 1.5 Type III – 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 5 but not more than 9 3+ units Greater than 1.5 but not more than 3 Type IV – 6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 9 3+ units Greater than 3 Property Address Dwelling Type Renewal or Initial Owner Property Code Violations License Type Police CFS * Final  License  Type ** Previous  License  Type *** 2800 67th Ave N Single Initial Curtis Griffin 4II N/A II 5325 70th Cir Single Initial Boukary Kabore 4 II N/A II 6207 Chowen Ave Single Initial Doreen Kalema / Butterfly Bound Care 11 IV N/A IV 6712 Drew Ave N Single Initial Adam Hardy 2 II N/A II 5301 France Ave N Single Initial Lance Rosenberg / Juniper Land Trust 6 III N/A III 5350 Logan Ave N Single Initial Matthew Forster / Elbrus Mgt 9 III N/A III II 904 53rd Ave N Single Renewal Moshe Vorotinov 0 I 0 I II 3000 64th Ave N Single Renewal Infinite Property 1 I 0 I I 1323 67th Ave N Single Renewal Ali Sajjad / 786 Homes LLC 0 I 0 I II 5348 70th Cir Single Renewal Xin Zhou 2 I 0 I I 5707 Bryant Ave N Single Renewal Lin Shuang LLC 2 I 0 I I 5214 Drew Ave N Single Renewal Paris & Nicole Fadden 0 I 0 I I 5432 Dupont Ave N Single Renewal Xiangming Guan ‐ Met Mitigation Plan 17 IV 0 IV IV 5416 Fremont Ave N Single Renewal Luisa Narvaez ‐ met requirements 1 I 0 I III 7137 Grimes Ave N Single Renewal Shawn Banks 0 I 0 I I 6761 Humboldt Ave N Single Renewal Li‐Chwen Su 0 I 0 I II 3813 Janet La Single Renewal Abdirahman Dhunkal 0 I 0 I IV 5332 Knox Ave N Single Renewal Ira Kovalsky 0 I 0 I I 2812 Ohenry Rd Single Renewal Mains'l Properties 2 I 0 I II 6800 Orchard Ave N Single Renewal Prosperous Property 1 I 0 I I 3213 Quarles Ave N Single Renewal Infinite Property 1 I 0 I I 6143 Regent Ave N Single Renewal Patricio Angamarca‐Romero ‐ Missing  CPTED follow up & CFH Cert 1 I 0 I III * CFS = Calls For Service for Renewal Licenses Only (Initial Licenses are not applicable to calls for service and will be listed N/A.) ** License Type Being Issued *** Initial licenses will not show All properties are current on City utilities and property taxes Type 1 = 3 Year    Type II = 2 Year      Type III = 1 Year Rental Licenses for Council Approval on August 24, 2020 C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:8/24/2020 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:C urt Boganey, City Manager T H R O U G H :D oran Cote, P ublic Works D irector BY:A ndrew H ogg, A ssistant City Engineer S U B J E C T:Res olu,on A ccep,ng Work Performed and A uthoriz ing F inal Payment, P roject No. 2020- 06, 2020 Pond Maintenance B ackground: O n D ecember 3, 2019, the City C ouncil aw arded P roject 2020-06 to Peterson C ompanies, I nc. of Chisago City, M innesota for the 2020 Pond M aintenance P roject. Peterson C ompanies, I nc. has succes s fully completed the w ork and is reques ,ng final payment for the project. B udget I ssues: The original contract amount w ith Peter s on C ompanies , I nc. for the impr ovements w as $206,1 3 5 .50. The total v alue of wor k cer,fied for final payment is $201,114.38. T he total pr oject cost including con,ngencies /administra,on/engineering /legal is $229,003.38 and was completed 7.0 percent under budget in the amount of $1 7 ,132.1 2 . The aAached res olu,on prov ides a s ummar y of the final amended cos ts and funding s ources for the project. S trategic Priories and Values: Enhanced Community I mage AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip,on U pload D ate Type Res olu,on 8/13/2020 Cover Memo Pay Voucher 8/13/2020 Cover Memo Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO._______________ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT, PROJECT NO. 2020-06, 2020 POND MAINTENANCE WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, Peterson Companies, Inc. of Chisago City, Minnesota has completed the following improvements in accordance with said contract: Project No. 2020-06, 2020 Pond Maintenance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. Final payment shall be made on Project No. 2020-06, 2020 Pond Maintenance Project, taking the contractor’s receipt in full. The total amount to be paid for said improvements under said contract shall be $201,114.38. 2. The estimated project costs and revenues are hereby amended as follows: COSTS As Awarded As Final Construction Cost $ 206,135.50 $ 201,114.38 Engineering and Administrative $ 30,000.00 $ 27,889.00 Contingency $ 10,000.00 $ 0.00 TOTAL $ 246,135.50 $ 229,003.38 REVENUES As Awarded As Final Storm Drainage Utility Fund $ 246,135.50 $ 229,003.38 August 24, 2020 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Project No. 2020-06 Payment Voucher No. 4 For Period Ending July 24, 2020 City of Brooklyn Center to: Peterson Companies, Inc. 8326 Wyoming Trail Chisago City, MN 55013 651-257-6864 Amount of Contract: $206,135.50 Date Contract Approved: 1/8/2020 TOTAL: $206,135.50 Project Description: 2020 Pond 40-001 Maintenance Project Value Less Less of Work Charges 5 Less Net Project Account Contract Certified and Percent Previous Amount Number Number Amount To Date Deducts Retained Payments Due Storm 49411-6530-08202006 $206,135.50 $201,114.38 $191,058.66 $10,055.72 Total Project $206,135.50 $201,114.38 $0.00 $191,058.66 $10,055.72` Payment 1 $64,719.70 Payment 6 $0.00 Payment 2 $120,969.29 Payment 7 $0.00 Payment 3 $5,369.67 Payment 8 $0.00 Payment 4 $10,055.72 Payment 9 $0.00 Payment 5 $0.00 Total Payments $201,114.38 This is to certify that work items shown on this statement of work certified herein have been actually furnished for the referenced project in accordance with plans & specifications approved and the total work is 98% complete. ______________________________ _____________________________ Project Manager/Inspector City Engineer WSB CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Date: 7/24/2020 Date: ______________ CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION Date: _____________ _____________________________ CONTRACTOR I hereby authorize payment of this voucher. Date: ___________ ____________________________ City Manager CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ____ Hold check and call when ready. ___ Send check to address shown above. Contractor's signature below certifies the following: That final payment, quantities and values of work certified herein are fair, complete and include all project work items; that all Contract Revisions, Extension of Contract Time and "Notificatons for Contract Revisons" set forth in MnDOT 1402, 1403 and 1806 are complete, have been reconciled and no more will be submitted; and that contractor waives all rights to make any further claims or adjustments pertaining to the project in its entirety and hereby accepts final payment in full. Acceptance and waiver does not satisfy or nullify other contractual duties, liabilities, obligations, warranties and/or other requirements. 7/30/2020 X C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:8/24/2020 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:C urt Boganey, City Manager T H R O U G H :N/A BY:D oran M. Cote, P.E., P ublic Works D irector S U B J E C T:Res olu,on A uthoriz ing X cel Energy to Recover C os t of Undergrounding Brooklyn Boulevard Electric Transmis s ion Facili,es by a S urcharge to Brooklyn C enter X cel Ratepayers - Brooklyn Boulevard C orridor P roject P hase 2, P roject No. 2021-05 B ackground: O n M arch 2 5 , 2019, the C ity Council dir ected staff to proceed w ith the preliminary des ign, environmental documenta,on, easement acquis i,on and final des ign w ork for the Brooklyn Boulev ard C or ridor P roject P has e 2 (Bas s L ake Road to I nterstate 94), P roj ect N o. 2 0 2 1 -0 5 . This proj ect is s cheduled to be constructed in 2021 and 2022. The proposed s tr eet recons truc,on and s treetscape improvements will improve roadw ay s afety, enhance traffic oper a,ons , reduce acces s points and provide impr oved bicycle and pedes trian facili,es for a one-mile s egment of corridor in Brooklyn C enter between Bass L ake Road (C S A H 10) and I nterstate 9 4 . The project w ill enhance bicycle and pedes trian trav el by adding a tr ail, improv ing s idew alks , tr ans it s tops , adding s treetscaping and landscaping and improving the func,onality of inter s ec,ons w ith modified turn lanes and acces s contr ol throughout the corridor. This pr oject cons is ts of P roj ect N os . 8 and 9 from the C orridor S tudy. O n S eptember 21, 2 0 0 1 , the P ublic U ,li,es C ommis s ion (P U C ) approv ed that X cel Energy es tablis h a Community Reques ted Facility S urcharge (C R FS ) Rider to recover the cos ts of dis tribu,on facili,es being undergrounded where reques ted or ordered by a C ity where the City elects not to prepay the cos ts . The City w ould receive no,ce of the incremental cos ts as s ociated w ith a dis tribu,on under gr ounding project and could then elect to pr epay or allow recov ery through the C R FS mechanis m. For other projects, the affected municipality would receive no,ce of any rate filing w ith the C ommis s ion to recov er s pecial facility cos ts by surcharge from the customers in the municipality. The s urcharge op,on, C R FS , is available for thos e projects w here each rate pay er of the City w ould have a s mall s urcharge added to their electric bill bas ed on a formula to finance the cos t of the w ork over a period of ,me. T he C R FS has been us ed previous ly by the C ity of Brooklyn Center to pay for all or a por,on of the cos ts to underground overhead X cel Energy facili,es including the project noted above. I t is r ecommended that the cos ts to bury the X cel E nergy pow er lines be funded through the C R FS program. S taff applied for a H ennepin County Roadside Enhancement Partners hip P rogram (R E P ) grant to help offs et a por,on of the cos ts but the County has indicated that other than what is curr ently pr ogr ammed in their C I P no addi,onal funds will be available for any pr oject in the County due to the economic impacts of the pandemic. I f the undergrounding is to enhance the v is ual aes the,cs of the corr idor, the R E P program would have contributed at a 33 percent level. B udget I ssues: The Brookly n B oulev ar d Corridor P roj ect P hase 2 (Bass L ake Road to I nters tate 94) is iden,fied in the City ’s 2020 C apital I mprovement P rogram and the total project cos t is es ,mated to be $1 5 ,000,0 0 0 . The es,mated cost to underground the X cel Energy pow er lines is $376,000. S trategic Priories and Values: Key Transporta,on I nvestments AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip,on U pload D ate Type Res olu,on 8/17/2020 Cover Memo X cel Energy S tatement of Work 8/17/2020 Cover Memo Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. _______________ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING XCEL ENERGY TO RECOVER COST OF UNDERGROUNDING BROOKLYN BOULEVARD ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION FACILITIES BY A SURCHARGE TO BROOKLYN CENTER XCEL RATEPAYERS - BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR PROJECT PHASE 2, PROJECT NO. 2021-05 WHEREAS, the City will be undertaking reconstruction and streetscape improvements to improve roadway safety, enhance traffic operations, reduce access points and provide improved bicycle and pedestrian facilities for a 1-mile segment of the corridor in Brooklyn Center between Bass Lake Road (County Road 10) and Interstate 94; and WHEREAS, streetscape improvements also include burying the existing overhead power lines as was done in 2001 on Brooklyn Boulevard from south of 63rd Avenue to the north City limits and in 2018 from 49th Avenue to Bass Lake Road; and WHEREAS, the City understands that Xcel Energy will not place its facilities underground on a County Road unless the City agrees to Xcel's collection of its necessary, actual and reasonably incurred additional costs by a surcharge on its customers within the City; and WHEREAS, the City had applied for a Hennepin County Roadside Enhancement Partnership Program (REP) grant to help offset a portion of the costs of burying the existing overhead power line but that request was denied. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that 1. Xcel Energy is hereby requested and directed to relocate its overhead facilities on Brooklyn Boulevard from just north of Bass Lake Road (County Road 10) to just south of 63rd Avenue underground. 2. The City agrees that Xcel Energy may collect its necessary, actual and reasonably incurred costs, or a portion thereof, by a surcharge as determ ined b y t he underground tariff issued by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. 3. The City requests that Xcel Energy recover $376,000 of the total estimated costs to place their facilities underground. RESOLUTION NO. _______________ August 24, 2020 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. DATE: The estimate is compromised of the following major components: The following shall constitute the "Work" to be performed by Xcel Energy: The City of Brooklyn Center has requested Xcel Energy to relocate and replace the existing overhead facilities along Brooklyn Blvd with an underground systemd. This work is to be done along Brooklyn Blvd between 59th Ave N and just north of 62nd Ave N. The cost for the conversion of these facilities is $375,146.12. The City of Brooklyn Center has agreed to procede with the City Requested Facility Surcharge (CFRS) process. Municipality agrees to pay Xcel Energy for Xcel Energy's actual total cost of the Work, subject to the Municipality's right of cost review in accordance with the terms of this Statement of Work ("Statement"). The current estimate for the Work is $376,000.00 ("Estimate"). WORK LOCATION: Brooklyn Blvd from 59th Ave N to 62nd Ave N ADDRESS: Brooklyn Center, MN CONSISTING OF: 08/17/20 WORK REQUESTED BY: The City of Brooklyn Center ("Municipality") STATEMENT OF WORK REQUESTED BY COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR TOWNSHIP FOR PROJECTS WITH ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS OVER $25,000 right therin. Municipality's and Xcel Energy's rights and obligations with respect to the facillities and services provided through the facilities are subject to the terms of this Statement, as well as the additional terms and conditions provided in the Xcel Energy Electric Rate Book, as now exists or may hereafter be changed, on file with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commision. fifty (50) percent of the Estimate ("Down Payment"). All Work shall be performed pursuant to good utility practice (as that term is generally understood in the utility industry) utilizing Xcel Energy's commercially reasonable efforts to complete the Work within the Estimate under Xcel Energy's then current design standards, operating procedures, and safety procedures. The facillities installed or removed by Xcel Energy shall be the property of Xcel Energy and any payment by Municipality shall not entitle Municipality to any ownership interest or Total: The undersigned herby requests and authorizes Xcel Energy to perform the Work. In consideration thereof and in lieu of a City Requested Facilities Sucharge, the City agrees to pay Xcel Energy on the ("Statement"). The current estimate for the Work is ($188,000.00 ) which is Component Sub-estimate Costs are derived from the boring in of new three phase feeder & tap level cable and pulling new feeder cable through existing duct and manhole system along Beard Ave N. The installation of new poles and padmounted facilities to keep overhead commercial radials fed. Costs also include the removals of Xcel Energy overhead facilities. Costs derived do not inlcude those of any communication facilities that need to be relocated due to this project. Xcel Energy poles cannot be remove until communication facilities have been removed and relocated. Payment of $ in performance of the Work in good faith. In the event Xcel Energy and Municipality are unable to resolve any such disputes, the parties may seek redress in a forum with jurisdiction over the dispute. This Statement of Work is agreed to by Xcel Energy and Muncipality and receipt of the above Down 188,000.00 is herby acknowledged on behalf of Xcel Energy. complete. Upon receipt of the invoice for the cost balance, the City shall have the right to require that Xcel Energy provide reasonable cost support documentation, including change orders, for its actual total cost of the Work. The Municipality shall pay the balance of cost not subject to reasonable dispute within the timeframe set forth in the Minnesota Municipal Prompt Payment Act, Minn. Stat. 471-425. Xcel Energy and Municipality shall reasonably try to resolve any disputes with respect to costs incurred Energy shall provide Muncipality the opportunity to review more detailed documentation of the Work performed and related costs. Xcel Energy agrees to keep Municipality reasonably informed with respect to Xcel Energy's performance of the Work, consistent with good utility practice and will, at minimum, apprise Municipality when half of the Estimate has been spent and when ninety percent of the Estimate has been spent. Xcel Energy also agrees to timely nortify the Municipality when the Work is substantially notice of any proposed change orders increasing the cost of the Work. Municipality acknowledges that change orders that result from request of Municipality with respect to the performance of the Work or the scope of the Work may increase Xcel Energy's acutal cost of the Work. Upon Completion of the Work, Xcel Energy agrees to provide Municipality with final detal of the actual work performed and the actual costs of such work performed. Xcel Energy will identify any information included in such information that is non-public pursuant to Minn. Stat. Ch. 13. Upon request by Muncipality, Xcel In advance of the Work, Muncipality agrees to inform Xcel Energy of any Municipality-related or other projects that may affect the Work. During the Work, Xcel Energy agrees to provide the Muncipality Print Full Name and Title (if applicable) Address: Address: Phone: Phone: E-mail: E-mail: Estimated Total $ Form 17-7012 Estimated Construction $376,000.00 Estimated Removal $ 376,000.00 Joshua.H.Wubbena@xcelenergy.com Xcel Energy Work Order # Maple Grove, Mn 55369 763-493-1649 Print Full Name and Title Signature Signature of Authorized Representative 8701 Monticello Lane Northern States Power Company [Municipality] a Minnesota corporation ("Xcel Energy") James P Carlson - Design Manager C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:8/24/2020 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:C urt Boganey, City Manager T H R O U G H :N/A BY:D oran Cote, P ublic Works D irector S U B J E C T:F irs t Reading of an O rdinance A mending Chapter 4 of the C ity C ode of O rdinances Regarding Water Conserva1on Restric1ons B ackground: I n accordance w ith S tate S tatue, the C ity is required to update the C ity ’s Water S upply P lan every ten years . The mos t recent update approv ed by the C ity C ouncil on S eptember 23, 2 0 1 9 w as the third genera1on of the C ity ’s plan. This update built on the original plan approved by the C ity C ouncil in A pril, 1996. A s a part of the S tate S tatue regarding Water S upply P lans, S ec1on 103 G .291 requires ci1es to adopt and enforce conserva1on res tric1ons w hen the governor declares a cri1cal water deficiency. This requirement is above and beyond the C ity ’s exis 1ng sprinkling ban. The new propos ed ordinance will allow for greater control ov er water usage during 1mes of cri1 cal w ater deficiencies. The ordinance is based on the model ordinance from the League of M innesota Ci1es. The ordinance, as proposed, sets the following levels of water us e restric1ons during a cri1cal deficiency: Level 1 – D efault w ater use and there are no restric1ons other than the sprinkling ban. L evel 2 – Watering law ns not allowed betw een 10:0 0 a.m. and 4 :00 p.m., how ever, new s eed or sod and watering shrubs , flowers and plants is allow ed as is recrea1onal water us e. Was hing v ehicles is not allowed betw een 10:0 0 a.m. and 4:0 0 p.m. Bus inesses that rely heav ily on us e of outs ide w ater (e.g. golf courses ) may apply for a permit for increas ed usage. Level 3 – S ame as L evel 2 but permiBed days would be s et by the city. Level 4 – Total ban of outside w ater use. A change in w ater us e level does require no1fica1on to each property w ithin the city limits . The propos ed ordinance als o establis hes penal1es for viola1ng the ordinance. Consistent w ith the C ity C harter, this firs t reading of the or dinance w ill es tablis h a date for a s econd reading and public hearing to consider the propos ed or dinance w hich will be s cheduled for S eptember 28, 2020 if approved. B udget I ssues: There are no budget is s ues to consider with this ac1on. S trategic Priories and Values: S afe, S ecure, S table C ommunity AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip1on U pload D ate Type O rdinance Regula1ng Water U s age 8/13/2020 Cover Memo CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that an on-line public hearing will be held on the 28th day of September, 2020, at approximately 7:00 p.m. The Zoom meeting can be accessed electronically by https://zoom.us/meeting/tJMsf- GtqTstEtEmB9ACdz2OEheVhTQbaCeA/ics?icsToken=98tyKuCvrzMiH9OVtxGCRowEBYqg We_wtmJaj7d4kT28IgNXeFHZE-pHBLpLIdrR or by calling 1-312-626-6799 Meeting ID: 97188570785 Passcode: 780519. As City Hall is currently closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we strongly encourage you to forward your comments and questions to the City Clerk at bsuciu@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us or by phone at 763-569-3306. ORDINANCE NO. __________ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING WATER CONSERVATION RESTRICTIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE I. Water Conservation. Chapter 4 of the Brooklyn Center City Code is hereby amended by adding a new Section 4-206 as follows: Section 4-206. WATER CONSERVATION RESTRICTIONS. Subdivision 1. Purpose. The City Council finds that water conservation is critical to the City’s welfare and to the efficient and economical provision of safe water. When necessary and in its sole discretion, the city shall enforce restrictions on the use of water outside of any residence or business, including use of private water supplies to the extent allowed by state law, other than on permitted days and hours. This section establishes water conservation restrictions that may be enforced without the declaration by the governor of a critical water deficiency under Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.291. The restrictions in this section are in addition to those established under Section 4-202. Subdivision 2. Water Use Levels. The following water use restriction levels are established for the City. The restrictions established herein shall not apply to the use of water by the City’s fire department in performing its firefighting and related duties, including washing its vehicles. a. Level 1. Level 1 is the default water use restriction level and does not impose any specific restrictions on the use of outside water except for the restrictions established under Section 4-202 including, but not limited to, the even-odd sprinkling ban from May 1 to September 30 each year. b. Level 2. Under a Level 2 water use designation, the use of water outside of a residence or business, regardless of the source, shall comply with the following restrictions. (1) Watering lawns. Watering lawns is not permitted between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. In addition, watering lawns will only be permitted on an odd/even basis. A total lawn watering ban shall be in effect for properties on the odd side of the street on even numbered days of the month, and for properties on the even side of the street on odd days of the month. (2) Watering shrubs, flowers and new lawns. Watering shrubs, flowers and plants, and watering new sod or new seed that has been placed within the previous 30 days to establish a lawn are not subject to the watering restrictions established in this subdivision. Over-seeding an established lawn is not considered new seed. The property owner must, upon request, provide evidence of the date the new sod or seed was planted. (3) Other outside water use. Reasonable recreational use of outside water is permitted. Use of outside water for washing vehicles shall not occur between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. (4) Business use. A business which relies heavily upon the use of outside water in a way that conflicts with these restrictions may apply to the Director of Public Works for a permit allowing increased usage. The permit may include reasonable restrictions as necessary. If the Director of Public Works denies a permit request, the business may file an appeal under subdivision 6 of this section, except that the notice of appeal shall be filed with the Director of Public Works. c. Level 3. Under a Level 3 water use designation, the use of outside water is permitted as listed above, except the permitted days and hours of use shall be set by the Director of Public Works. No recreational use of outside water is permitted. The Director of Public Works may revise increased use permits issued for businesses when Level 3 restrictions are imposed. d. Level 4. Under a Level 4 water use designation, a total ban is imposed on the use of all outside water within the City. The exceptions identified in Level 2 shall continue to be allowed. No recreational use of outside water is permitted. The Director of Public Works may revise increased use permits issued for businesses when Level 4 restrictions are imposed. Subdivision 3. Normal Use Level. Level 1 shall constitute the normal level of use of outside water. If the Director of Public Works changes the water use restriction level, the restrictions associated with the identified level shall apply until the water use restriction level is returned to Level 1. Subdivision 4. Change in Use Level. If the Public Works Director determines enhanced water conservation restrictions need to be imposed to protect the public water supply, the Public Works Director may raise the water use restriction level to Level 2, Level 3, or Level 4, dependent upon water availability. A notice containing the provisions of the upgraded restriction level shall be provided to each property within the City limits, posted in the lobby at City hall, placed on the City’s website, and other reasonable efforts will be made to inform the public of the upgraded restrictions. The notice shall include the dates and times that the upgraded level shall commence. A person claiming to have not received individualized notice shall not be excused from the restrictions or surcharges imposed by this section. The City shall post on its website and undertake other reasonable efforts to notify residents when the water use restriction level returns to Level 1. It is a violation of this section to use outside water in a way that does not comply with the restrictions in effect under the applicable water use restriction level. Subdivision 5. Violations. Any person who violates this section shall be subject to a surcharge for water service as provided in this subdivision. The City Clerk, or designee, is authorized to enforce this section, including issuing violation notices and imposing surcharges. Surcharges shall be imposed and collected along with the charges for water service in accordance with Section 4-105. The imposition of a surcharge under this section shall not limit the right of the City to pursue other legal remedies to correct a violation or to recover applicable charges and surcharges. a. First Violation. Upon the first violation of this section, the City shall issue a written warning that identifies the violation and the penalties that could result if the violation continues. b. Second Violation. A second violation of this section occurring within 12 months of the first violation shall result in the imposition of a surcharge on the water service bill for the property in the amount identified in the City of Brooklyn Center Fee Schedule. c. Subsequent Violations. Each subsequent violation of this section occurring within 12 months of a previous violation shall result in the imposition of a surcharge on the water service bill for the property in the amount identified in the City of Brooklyn Center Fee Schedule. d. Notices. The City shall mail written warnings and notices of violation issued under this section to the person identified in the City’s system to receive the water service bill for the property. e. Equipment Failure. The City Clerk may grant an administrative waiver of a notice of violation if the person receiving the notice presents written documentation from a qualified vendor or an equipment replacement receipt within 10 days from the date of the notice showing, to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Clerk, the violation resulted from equipment failure. Subdivision 6. Appeal. A person who receives a notice of violation imposing a surcharge may appeal the violation in the same manner, and subject to the same restrictions, established for appealing an administrative citation under Sections 18-206 through 18-209. The notice of appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk. ARTICLE II. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty days following its legal publication. Adopted this 28th day of September, 2020. ____________________________ Mike Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ City Clerk Date of Publication _________________________ Effective Date _____________________________ (Strikeout indicates matter to be deleted, double underline indicates new matter.) C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:8/24/2020 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:C urt Boganey, City Manager T H R O U G H :D oran Cote, P ublic Works D irector BY:A ndrew H ogg, A ssistant City Engineer S U B J E C T:Res olu,on A ccep,ng Work Performed and A uthoriz ing F inal Payment, P roject No. 2019- 15, 70th Avenue S torm S ewer Rehabilita,on P roject B ackground: O n J anuary 13, 2020, the C ity Council awarded P roject 2019-15 to Engineering and Construc,on I nnovators (E C I ) of O akdale, M innesota for the 70th Av enue S tor m S ewer Rehabilita,on P roj ect. E C I has s uccessfully completed the w ork and is reques ,ng final payment for the project. B udget I ssues: The or iginal contract amount w ith E C I for the improv ements w as $265,1 7 0 .00. The total value of work cer,fied for final payment is $231,988.00. The total project cos t including con,ngencies /administra,on/engineering /legal is $296,3 7 4 .45 and w as completed 17 percent under budget in the amount of $6 1 ,331.5 5 . The aCached res olu,on prov ides a s ummar y of the final amended cos ts and funding s ources for the project. S trategic Priories and Values: Enhanced Community I mage AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip,on U pload D ate Type Res olu,on 8/14/2020 Cover Memo Pay Request 3 F inal LeCer 8/14/2020 Cover Memo Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO._______________ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT, PROJECT NO. 2019-15, 70th AVENUE STORM SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, Engineering and Construction Innovators (ECI) of Oakdale, Minnesota has completed the following improvements in accordance with said contract: Project No. 2019-15, 70th Avenue Storm Sewer Rehabilitation Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. Final payment shall be made on Project No. 2019-15, 70th Avenue Storm Sewer Rehabilitation Project, taking the contractor’s receipt in full. The total amount to be paid for said improvements under said contract shall be $231,988.00. 2. The estimated project costs and revenues are hereby amended as follows: COSTS As Awarded As Final Construction Cost $ 265,170.00 $ 231,988.00 Engineering and Administrative $ 70,536.00 $ 64,386.45 Contingency $ 20,000.00 $ 0.00 TOTAL $ 357,706.00 $ 296,374.45 REVENUES per Awarded As Final Storm Drainage Utility Fund $ 357,706.00 $ 296,374.45 August 24, 2020 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. H:\BRCN\C17119792\7_Construction\E_Pay Applications\PR 3 & Final\2020-08-13 Pay Req 3 and Final Letter 119792 .docx August 13, 2020 Mr. Andrew Hogg Assistant City Engineer City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 RE: 70th Avenue Storm Sewer Trunk Line Rehabilitation Project City of Brooklyn Center Project No. C17.119792 Dear Mr. Hogg, Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 3 and Final from Engineering & Construction Innovations for work completed on the 70th Avenue Storm Sewer Trunk Line Rehabilitation Project through July 21, 2020. At this time all punch list items have been completed. We have received and reviewed the Contractor’s close-out documents including IC134 Labor compliance and are satisfied that ECI has met their requirements to make final payment on the project. We have reviewed the contractor’s request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the amount of $11,599.40 to Engineering & Construction Innovations which includes full payment of the remaining retainage, which had been held at 5 percent. This project was awarded at a total Contract of $231,998.00 and all work has been completed for a total Contract completion of $265,170.00, which represents a 12.5% underrun. The Contract is now considered complete. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Brian D. Simmons, P.E. Project Manager Bolton & Menk, Inc. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Project No. 2019-15 Payment Voucher No. 3 & Final For Period Ending July 21, 2020 City of Brooklyn Center to:Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc 7002 6TH ST N Oakdale, MN 55128 (651) 313-6346 Amount of Contract: $265,170.00 Date Contract Approved: 1/13/2020 TOTAL (Adjusted Contract):$265,170.00 Project Description: 70th Ave Trunk Storm Sewer Value Less Less of Work Charges 0 Less Net Project Account Contract Certified and Percent Previous Amount Number Number Amount To Date Deducts Retained Payments Due Storm 49411-6530-8201915 $265,170.00 $231,988.00 $0.00 $0.00 $231,988.00 Total Project $265,170.00 $231,988.00 $0.00 $0.00 $231,988.00` Payment 1 & 2 $220,388.60 Payment 7 $0.00 Payment 3 $11,599.40 Payment 8 $0.00 Payment 4 $0.00 Payment 9 $0.00 Payment 5 $0.00 Payment 6 $0.00 Total Payments $231,988.00 This is to certify that work items shown on this statement of work certified herein have been actually furnished for the referenced project in accordance with plans & specifications approved and the total work is 87%complete. ______________________________ _____________________________ Project Manager Public Works Director Bolton & Menk, INC. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Date: 8/13/2020 Date: ______________ CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION Date: _____________ _____________________________ CONTRACTOR I hereby authorize payment of this voucher. Date: _______________________________________ City Manager CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ____Hold check and call when ready. ___ Send check to address shown above. Contractor's signature below certifies the following: That final payment, quantities and values of work certified herein are fair, complete and include all project work items; that all Contract Revisions, Extension of Contract Time and "Notificatons for Contract Revisons" set forth in MnDOT 1402, 1403 and 1806 are complete, have been reconciled and no more will be submitted; and that contractor waives all rights to make any further claims or adjustments pertaining to the project in its entirety and hereby accepts final payment in full. Acceptance and waiver does not satisfy or nullify other contractual duties, liabilities, obligations, warranties and/or other requirements. APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATION FOR PAYMENT AIA DOCUMENT G702 PAGE ONE OF 2 PAGES TO OWNER: City of Brooklyn Center PROJECT: 70th Ave SS Rehab APPLICATION NO: 3 Distribution to: x OWNER x ARCHITECT PERIOD TO: 03/01/20 to 03/31/20 CONTRACTOR FROM CONTRACTOR: VIA ARCHITECT: Engineering & Construction Innovations PROJECT NOS: 2019-25 CONTRACT FOR: 70th Ave Storm Sewer Trunk Line Rehabilitation CONTRACT DATE:1/15/2020 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowledge, Application is made for payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract.information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached.completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM $265,170.00 2. Net change by Change Orders $(33,182.00)CONTRACTOR: 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ± 2) $$231,988.00 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO $231,988.00 DATE (Column G on G703)By:Shane McFadden Date: 5. RETAINAGE: a.0 % of Completed Work $$0.00 State of:County of: (Column D + E on G703)Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of b.% of Stored Material $Notary Public: (Column F on G703)My Commission expires: Total Retainage (Lines 5a + 5b or Total in Column I of G703) $ 0.00 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE $231,988.00 In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and the data (Line 4 Less Line 5 Total)comprising the application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR Architect's knowledge, information and belief the Work has progressed as indicated, PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate) $220,388.60 the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE $ 11,599.40 is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, INCLUDING RETAINAGE $0.00 (Line 3 less Line 6)AMOUNT CERTIFIED . . . . . . . . . . . $ CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS (Attach explanation if amount certified differs from the amount applied. Initial all figures on this Total changes approved Application and on the Continuation Sheet that are changed to conform with the amount certified.) in previous months by Owner ARCHITECT: Total approved this Month ($33,182.00)By: Date: TOTALS $0.00 ($33,182.00)This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AIA DOCUMENT G702 · APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATION FOR PAYMENT · 1992 EDITION · AIA · ©1992 · THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AV., N.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20006-5292 · WARNING: Unlicensed photocopying violates U.S. copyright laws and will subject the violator to legal prosecution G702-1992 CAUTION: You should use an original AIA document which has this caution printed in red. An original assures that changes will not obscured as may occur when documents are reproduced. ($33,182.00) 04/08/20 NET CHANGES by Change Order AIA Document G703TM - 1992 CONTINUATION SHEET PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATION FOR PAYMENT, APPLICATION NO: 3 containing Contractor's signed certification is attached.APPLICATION DATE: 4/8/20 In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar.PERIOD TO: 03/01/20 to 03/31/20 Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply.ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 2019-25 A B C D E F G H I J ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED WORK COMPLETED MATERIALS TOTAL % BALANCE RETAINAGE NO.VALUE FROM PREVIOUS THIS PERIOD PRESENTLY COMPLETED (G ÷ C)TO FINISH (IF VARIABLE APPLICATION STORED AND STORED (C - G) RATE) (D + E)(NOT IN TO DATE D OR E) (D+E+F) 10 Mobilization $13,875.00 $3,468.75 $10,406.25 $0.00 $13,875.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 20 Traffic Control $7,500.00 $1,875.00 $5,625.00 $0.00 $7,500.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 30 Dewatering $27,000.00 $13,500.00 $13,500.00 $0.00 $27,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 40 Erosion Control $550.00 $137.50 $412.50 $0.00 $550.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 50 Site Restoration $1,500.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 60 Reinforced Concrete Pipe Joint Repair $3,510.00 $0.00 $3,510.00 $0.00 $3,510.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 70 Corrugated Metal Pipe External Void Grout $4,480.00 $0.00 $4,480.00 $0.00 $4,480.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 80 Corrugated Metal Pipe External Void Fill Drill Holes $850.00 $0.00 $7,650.00 $0.00 $7,650.00 900.00% $0.00 $0.00 90 72" CMP Lining $34,830.00 $0.00 $34,830.00 $0.00 $34,830.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 100 Reinforced Concrete Pipe Invert Patching - type 1 $8,733.00 $0.00 $21,812.00 $0.00 $21,812.00 249.77% $0.00 $0.00 110 Reinforced Concrete Pipe Surface Patching $5,208.00 $0.00 $5,208.00 $0.00 $5,208.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 120 Reinforced Concrete Pipe Joint Patching $3,534.00 $0.00 $3,534.00 $0.00 $3,534.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 130 24" RCP Connection Repair $4,000.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 140 MH/CB Connection Repair $3,720.00 $0.00 $4,650.00 $0.00 $4,650.00 125.00% $0.00 $0.00 150 Invert Repair - type 2 $95,760.00 $0.00 $41,769.00 $0.00 $41,769.00 43.62% $0.00 $0.00 160 Invert Repair - type 3 $50,120.00 $0.00 $50,120.00 $0.00 $50,120.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 CO1 Deductions for quantities reduction ($33,182.00) $265,170.00 $18,981.25 $213,006.75 $0.00 $231,988.00 $0.00 $0.00 CAUTION: You should sign on original AIA Contract Document, on which this text appears in RED. An original assures that changes will not be obscured. AIA Document G703TM-1992. Copyright © 1963, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1970, 1978, 1983 and 1992 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA ® Document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. Purchasers are permitted to reproduce ten (10) copies of this document when completed. To report copyright violations of AIA Contract Documents, e-mail The American Institute of Architects' legal counsel, copyright@aia.org. 3/24/2020 https://www.mndor.state.mn.us/tp/eservices/_/Retrieve/0/c-/v3VIYmARCdyr06pIcTQv0g__?FILE__=Print2&PARAMS__=6983690092933… https://www.mndor.state.mn.us/tp/eservices/_/Retrieve/0/c-/v3VIYmARCdyr06pIcTQv0g__?FILE__=Print2&PARAMS__=6983690092933581459 1/1 Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number:0-096-093-728 Submitted Date and Time:24-Mar-2020 7:55:12 AM Legal Name:ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION INNOVATIONS INC Federal Employer ID:42-1494741 User Who Submitted:Eci7002 Type of Request Submitted:Contractor Affidavit Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number:1280516096 Minnesota ID:4728656 Project Owner:CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Project Number:2019-25 Project Begin Date:18-Dec-2019 Project End Date:06-Mar-2020 Project Location:70TH AVENUE BROOKLYN CENTER Project Amount:$231,988.00 Subcontractors:No Subcontractors Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll-free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Monday - Friday. Please print this page for your records using the print or save functionality built into your browser. C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:8/24/2020 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:C urt Boganey, City Manager T H R O U G H :N/A BY:M ark Ebens teiner, F inance D irector S U B J E C T:A nnual Report on F ranchis e Fees B ackground: A s a condi,on of the ordinances adopted to establis h and implement the franchise fees on X cel Energy and Center Point Energy, s taff is required to report to the City Council annually on the collec,on of franchis e fees . This memorandum will serve that purpose. No formal ac,on is required at this ,me. The 2019 fis cal y ear w as the 16th year for collec,on of fr anchis e fees fr om X cel E ner gy and C enter Point Energy. Receipts for the year from each of the franchisees were as follows: Company D ate Received X cel Energy 5/03/2019 $ 110,025.73 1s t Q uarter X cel Energy 8/01/2019 111,080.74 2nd Q uarter X cel Energy 10/31/2019 111,482.49 3rd Q uarter X cel Energy 2/01/2020 111,008.11 4th Q uarter S ubtotal $ 443,597.07 2019 Center Point Energy 5/08/2019 $ 66,871.76 1s t Q uarter Center Point Energy 7/24/2019 67,394.92 2nd Q uarter Center Point Energy 11/01/2019 66,819.89 3rd Q uarter Center Point Energy 2/03/2020 66,571.75 4th Q uarter S ubtotal $ 267,658.32 2019 TO TA L $ 711,255.39 2019 B udget I ssues: A ll dollars receiv ed fr om the franchis e fees w ere receipted to the S treet Reconstruc,on F und for us e in the repair and recons truc,on of C ity s treets . T he actual amount received in 2019 exceeded the total budgeted amount of $689,0 0 0 in franchis e fee rev enue. A ll remaining funds at year-end will be carried forw ard in the fund for future repair and recons truc,on of City s treets. S trategic Priories and Values: Key Transporta,on I nvestments C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:8/24/2020 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:C urt Boganey, City Manager T H R O U G H :M eg Beekman, C ommunity D evelopment D irector BY:G inny M cI ntosh, City P lanner / Zoning A dminis trator S U B J E C T:P lanning Commission A pplica/on No. 2020-004, for P reliminary and F inal P lat and S ite and Building P lan A pprovals, and the Es tablishment of a P lanned U nit D evelopment for C ertain P roper/es L ocated in the 6000 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard (Commonly known as 6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 Brooklyn Boulevard) B ackground: C A lan H omes (“The A pplicant ”) is reques /ng approval of a preliminary and final plat, s ite and building plan, and es tablishment of a P lanned U nit D evelopment for a s er ies of pr oper /es located w ithin the 6000 block of Br ookly n B oulev ar d, s outh of the S anctuary at Br ookly n C enter and 61s t Avenue North, and w est of Brooklyn Boulevard. These proper/es are all cur rently ow ned by the Economic D ev elopment A uthority of Brooklyn C enter and encompas s the following addresses : 6 0 2 5 , 6 0 3 1 , 6 0 3 7 , and 6045 Br ookly n Boulevard (“The S ubject P roperty ”). This reques t is associated with a s econd reques t from C A lan H omes to develop a s econd s et of triplexes along the 6 9 0 0 B lock of Brooklyn Boulevard at the addres s es commonly known as 6921, 6927, 6933, and 6939 Br ookly n Boulev ard, and filed separately for considera/on under P lanning Commission A pplica/on No. 2020-005. O n May 11, 2020, C A lan H omes ' concept plan for the 6000 and 6900 blocks of Brooklyn Boulevard, as contemplated under P lanning Commission A pplica/on N os . 2 0 2 0 -0 0 4 and 2020-005, w as pr es ented to the City C ouncil for Concept Review. The proposal was to develop two s eparate sites along Br ookly n Boulevard into a combined 1 3 triplex buildings (39 total dwelling units ), and addr es s ed the re-plaFng of eight (8 ) E DA - ow ned lots into tw o s eparate development sites to allow for said redev elopment. The proposal for the S ubject P r oper ty contemplates construc/on of s ev en (7) triplexes for a total of 21 dw elling units and associated site improvements . O n J une 22, 2020, City C ouncil approv ed a P reliminary D evelopment A greement w ith C A lan H omes , L L C for the tw o s ets of E DA -owned pr oper /es . The purpos e of this agreement was to allow the A pplicant /me to rev iew the property, obtain financing, and nego/ate w ith the E D A of Brooklyn Center on an agreement for the purchase of the S ubject P roperty and property to the nor th (6900 B lock of Brooklyn Boulevard). This A greement is s et to expire on D ecember 3 1 , 2020 but als o allows the /me neces s ar y to work through the land us e appr ovals contemplated under this applica/on. S hould the A pplicant receiv e appr oval for the proposed us e, the E DA w ould need to nego/ate a purchas e agreement for the S ubj ect P roperty, which w ould require a separate public hearing and approval from the E DA . A public hearing was or iginally s cheduled at the P lanning C ommis s ion mee/ng for J uly 9 , 2020; how ever, this hearing w as re-s cheduled follow ing City s taff concerns regarding adjus tments to the s ubmiIed s ite plan to account for addi/onal easements required for the P has e I I Brooklyn Boulev ard project, scheduled to begin in 2 0 2 1 , and ques /ons s ur rounding access off Br ookly n Boulev ard. A public no/ce w as publis hed in the Brooklyn C enter S un Post on J une 25th, 2 0 2 0 , and tw o s epar ate s ets of mail no/ces w ere s ent out to both taxpayers and res idents in proximity of the S ubject P roperty w ith a one-page informa/on flyer on the project. C ity s taff ins talled a “D ev elopment Under Rev iew ” sign on the S ubj ect P roperty for addi/onal no/ce. The P lanning Commis s ion held a joint public hearing for P lanning C ommis s ion A pplica/on Nos . 2020-004 and 2020-005 at their mee/ng on A ugus t 13, 2020. T he dis cus s ion was lengthy and cov ered a range of topics , including: screening and buffering from adj acent s ingle-family r es iden/al, loca/on of the s outh trash enclosure for the S ubj ect P roperty, minimum par king requirements , management of the pr oper /es , and the proposed loca/ons and finis hes for the proposed 2 0 -percent of units s et as ide for S ec/on 8 voucher holders . A few res idents w er e in aIendance for the v irtual public hearing, and City staff r eceived calls from a few other r es idents in advance of the mee/ng. The comments from the public during the hearing regarding the S ubject P roperty related to s aid buffering from s ingle family residen/al proper/es, and addi/onal informa/on from the A pplicant on their plans for w ho would manage the pr oper /es following cons truc/on. City s taff did not receive any comments from the pubic that w ere in outright opposi/on of the project. Following clos e of the public hearing and addi/onal dis cus s ion among the P lanning C ommis s ioner s and the A pplicant, the P lanning C ommis s ion elected to unanimously (7 -0 ) recommend City Council approv al of the requested preliminary and final plat, site and building plan, and establis hment of a P lanned Unit D evelopment, w ith the caveat that the as s ociated res olu/on be amended to pr ovide language outlining that the S ec/on 8 units be offered on vary ing floors of the tr iplex, r ather than just the basement or garden units , as was originally indicated by the A pplicant. Follow ing dis cus s ion, the A pplicant agreed with Commissioners and expres s ed a w illingnes s to comply w ith this request. A copy of the P lanning C ommis s ion Report for P lanning C ommis s ion A pplica/on No. 2020-004, dated A ugust 1 3 , 2020, and the C ity C ouncil res olu/on regarding the approv al of the pr eliminar y and final plats , s ite and building plan, and establis hment are included w ith this memorandum. The C ity ’s Engineering D iv is ion prepared an updated memor andum to reflect clarifica/on in comments and requirements as rela/ng to the pr eliminar y and final plats. S aid memorandum has been incorpor ated into the s taff report exhibits. F inally, following discussion with the C ity AIor ney ’s office, C ity s taff incorporated an addi/onal condi/on that the A pplicant vacate all eas ements as neces s ary per the C ity E ngineer and file no/ce of comple/on of vaca/on with the H ennepin County Recorder ’s office prior to filing of the final plat and as s ociated Mylar. A s the r eques t by the A pplica/on includes a reques t to re-z one the S ubject P roperty from C-1 (S ervice/O ffice), R -5 (Mul/ple Family Res idence), and R -1 (O ne Family Res idence) D is tricts to P lanned Unit D evelopment-Neighborhood/Mixed U s e (P U D -N/M U ) D is trict, City C ode dictates that the C ity Zoning O rdinance be amended to reflect the re-z oning. A draN copy of the ordinance language is included for review. S hould the C ity C ouncil proceed with the re-z oning, a mo/on to approv e a firs t r eading of an ordinance amending Chapter 35 of the Zoning C ode of O rdinances regarding the S ubject P roperty located a t 6025, 6031, 6 0 3 7 , and 6 0 4 5 Br ookly n Boulevard would be needed. Following the mo/on, a s econd reading and public hearing would be s cheduled for S eptember 14, 2020. B udget I ssues: None to cons ider at this /me. S trategic Priories and Values: Enhanced Community I mage, Targeted Redevelopment AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip/on U pload D ate Type P C S taff Report - 6000 Block of Brooklyn Blvd - C A lan H omes , L L C 8/18/2020 Backup M aterial Exhibit A -A pplica/on and D ocumenta/on - 6000 Block of Brooklyn Blvd - C A lan H omes , L L C 8/18/2020 Backup M aterial Exhibits B through E - 6000 Block of Brooklyn Blvd - C A lan H omes , L L C 8/18/2020 Backup M aterial O rdinance-A mending C hapter 35 of C ity C ode of O rdinances Regarding the Zoning C lassifica/on of C ertain L ands L ocated A long Brooklyn Boulevard 8/18/2020 O rdinance Res olu/on-D is pos i/on of P lanning Commission A pplica/on No. 2020-004 8/18/2020 Resolu/on LeIer App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 1 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: August 13, 2020 Application No. 2020-004 Applicant: C Alan Homes Location: 6000 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard (6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 Brooklyn Boulevard) Requests: (1) Preliminary and Final Plat, (2) Site and Building Plan, (3) Establishment of a Planned Unit Development for the development of seven triplexes and related site improvements REQUESTED ACTION C Alan Homes (“The Applicant”) is requesting approval of a preliminary and final plat, site and building plan, and establishment of a Planned Unit Development for a series of properties located within the 6000 block of Brooklyn Boulevard, south of the Sanctuary at Brooklyn Center and 61st Avenue North, and west of Brooklyn Boulevard (Exhibit A). These properties are all currently owned by the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center and encompass the following addresses: 6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 Brooklyn Boulevard. Due to the nature of the requests, including the establishment of a Planned Unit Development and preliminary and final plat approvals, a public hearing is required. A public notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on June 25th, 2020 (Exhibit B). Following City staff concerns regarding adjustments to the submitted site plan to account for additional easements required for the Phase II Brooklyn Boulevard reconstruction and modernization project, scheduled to begin in 2021, and questions surrounding driveway access off Brooklyn Boulevard from Hennepin County, City staff requested an extension to the application review period as granted under Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, Subd. 3 (f)—refer to Exhibit C. This request was intended to provide additional time for the Applicant to address the aforementioned items. Due to the continuance of the public hearing, City staff mailed updated public notices out to residents and/or taxpayers and incorporated a one page informational flyer on the project in the mailing. City staff also requested Public Works install a “Development Proposal Under Review” sign on site which provides a contact number for any questions regarding the proposal. Since the requested extension, the Applicant has revised the site plan to reflect the necessary easements along Brooklyn Boulevard and the City was provided with a recommendation from Hennepin County regarding driveway access off Brooklyn Boulevard, which is detailed in this report. BACKGROUND Developer The City was approached by Terry Robertson and Curt Brekke with C Alan Homes, a local builder and remodeling company specializing in high-end single family homes, in the spring of 2020. Mr. Robertson and Mr. Brekke are interested in diversifying the focus of C Alan Homes and are seeking to develop two • Application Filed: 6/15/2020 • Review Period (60-day) Deadline: 8/14/2020 • Extension Declared: 7/7/2020 • Extended Review Period Deadline: 10/13/2020 App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 2 sets of EDA-owned sites along Brooklyn Boulevard with a series of triplexes that would be available for rent. Each triplex would consist of three, three bedroom units. The anticipated rents would likely range between $1,850 and $2,200 per month, and the Applicant has committed to providing 20% of the units as set aside for Section 8 voucher holders. Due to the Applicant’s background in high-end single family home construction, the Applicant has indicated that each building would have the look and feel of a large, high quality single family home, with a combination of individual and shared on-site amenities. Conformance with City Policies and Property Background The EDA has been acquiring single family and undersized parcels along Brooklyn Boulevard for many years as part of a larger strategy to improve safety by reducing and consolidating access points, and assembling land for redevelopment into higher density land uses. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan created an overlay district along the corridor and re-guided most of the future land uses to “Neighborhood Mixed Use” or “NMU;” allowing medium density residential and/or neighborhood-serving commercial uses. As transportation and land use patterns along the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor have changed, the EDA has strategically acquired property for redevelopment. With Phase II of the Brooklyn Boulevard reconstruction and modernization project scheduled to begin in 2021, land use patterns will be affected as access points are consolidated and the roadway altered to allow for a more walkable, neighborhood- oriented development pattern. As a result of the roadway reconstruction plans, as well as the re-guiding of most of the future land uses along the corridor, the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan Implementation Chapter included a plan for a comprehensive land use study of the Brooklyn Center corridor, which is currently underway. The intended outcome of the land use study will result in the creation of a regulatory framework for development along the corridor as well as design guidelines to help facilitate the creation of a more walkable, neighborhood-oriented development pattern along Brooklyn Boulevard. The Brooklyn Boulevard land use study will include a health impact assessment as well as a market analysis of the area in terms of feasible land uses. One of the goals of the study is to look at EDA-owned sites, and particularly those that are only as deep as a single-family lot, to determine how they could be redeveloped in ways that puts them back into productive use without negatively impacting surrounding neighborhoods. The recently completed market analysis found that a mid-density residential product, such as row- homes or townhomes, or a low density office condo product, would be suitable along the corridor between controlled intersections given the access constraints that will exist after the roadway is reconstructed. The market analysis further indicated that higher intensity commercial/retail uses would be more suitable focused around signalized intersections where access is better. The market analysis also found the current market would likely not bear new low and mid-rise multi-family housing development without subsidy given low market rents. The findings of the market analysis are not unique to Brooklyn Center. The cost of construction, combined with the challenge of putting together financing for projects, make it difficult to complete multi-family developments without some form of gap financing or subsidy. As a result, the vast majority of multi-family housing that is built is either market rate and in locations that can achieve the highest rents, or alternatively, affordable housing, financed through federal sources and maintained at rents affordable to those making 50-60% area median income. Very little housing is constructed that is App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 3 considered affordable to those mid-income earners making between 80-120% area median incomes. So little, in fact, that in cities across the nation this type of housing is called “the missing middle”. The land use study found that the vacancy rate for apartments along Brooklyn Boulevard is 1.3%, with lower than average market rents. The study notes that there is an opportunity to add newer inventory of all unit types, including market-rate, workforce, affordable, and senior housing. With current rental rates in Brooklyn Center low compared to the rest of the market, increasing construction costs, and higher capitalization rates (which help indicate an anticipated “rate of return” on investments and overall risk), lower density multi-family developments, such as triplexes, duplexes, and perhaps townhouses, are outlined in the market analysis as a potentially more feasible option. The EDA currently owns four properties located at the southwest corner of 61st Avenue North and Brooklyn Boulevard, which total approximately 1.65 acres. These properties, in addition to a series of four properties on the west side of the 6900 block of Brooklyn Boulevard (0.98 acres), are both under consideration for the development of triplexes by C Alan Homes, and are identified under Planning Commission Application Nos. 2020-004 (6000 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard) and 2020-005 (6900 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard). Although these development proposals are for the same type of product and the same application requests, a separate staff report has been prepared for each of the sites. On May 11, 2020, C Alan Homes' concept plan for the 6000 and 6900 blocks of Brooklyn Boulevard, as contemplated under Planning Commission Application Nos. 2020-004 and 2020-005, was presented to the City Council for Concept Review. The proposal was to develop two separate sites along Brooklyn Boulevard into a combined 13 triplex buildings (39 total dwelling units). The proposal addressed the re- platting of eight (8) EDA-owned lots into two separate development sites to allow for said redevelopment. On June 22, 2020, City Council approved a Preliminary Development Agreement with C Alan Homes, LLC for the two sets of EDA-owned properties. The purpose of this agreement was to allow the Applicant time to review the property, obtain financing, and negotiate with the EDA of Brooklyn Center on an agreement for the purchase of the Subject Property and property to the north (6900 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard). This Agreement is set to expire on December 31, 2020 but also allows the time necessary to work through the land use approvals contemplated under this application. Should the Applicant receive approval for the proposed use, the EDA would need to negotiate a purchase agreement for the Subject Property, which would require a separate public hearing and approval from the EDA. Site Data 2040 Land Use Plan: Neighborhood Mixed Use (N-MU @ 15.01-31 DU/Ac.), High Density Residential (HDR @ 15.01-31 DU/Ac.), and Low Density Residential (LDR @ 3.01-5 DU/Ac.) Neighborhood: Kylawn Current Zoning: C1 (Service/Office), R5 (Multiple Family Residence), and R1 (One Family Residence) Districts Site Area: 1.65 acres App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 4 Surrounding Area Direction 2040 Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use North Low Density Residential (LDR) C1 (Service/Office) District Vacant (EDA-owned) South Low-Density Residential R-1 (One Family Residence) SF Detached East Right-of-Way Right-of-Way (ROW) Brooklyn Boulevard West Low-Density Residential R-1 (One Family Residence) SF Detached Note: The Subject Property is located within the identified Brooklyn Boulevard Overlay District under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Map 1. Subject Property COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Subject Property is currently comprised of four properties with three different future land use designations: Neighborhood Mixed Use, High Density Residential, and Low Density Residential. As proposed, the Subject Property would be located within the identified Brooklyn Boulevard Overlay District, which is a 1,200 foot wide corridor. The 2040 Plan stresses the creation of a walkable, transit connected, experience-based place that brings the City forward and offers new opportunities to existing and future residents. “The idea that the community will thrive with a more integrated land use pattern is fully accepted, and promoted through this Plan. The areas that are planned for this type of change are guided within this Plan for Neighborhood Mixed-Use, Commercial Mixed-Use, Business Mixed-Use and/or are designated in the Brooklyn Boulevard Overlay District.” App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 5 The 2040 Comprehensive Plan also identifies the following Housing and Neighborhood Goals: • Promote a diverse housing stock that provides safe, stable, and accessible housing options to all of Brooklyn Center’s residents. • Recognize and identify ways to match Brooklyn Center’s housing with the City’s changing demographics. Approximately 37% of the City’s housing stock is comprised of rental housing, the vast majority as multi- family units. The majority of multi-family units in the City were constructed prior to 1979, with the bulk of units having been constructed between 1966 and 1969, making the majority of multi-family inventory between 51 to 54 years in age. With the exception of the two Real Estate Equities projects currently under construction at Northway Drive and County Road 10, there has been no new construction of multi-family units since the 1970s. With the exception of three rental townhome developments, all of the City’s multi-family rental housing is comprised of one and two-bedroom units. As a result of this highly homogenous housing stock, the cost of housing in Brooklyn Center fits within a relatively narrow affordability band. One of the goals of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is to provide a more diverse range of housing options and price points, which makes for a more economically resilient community. As part of the community engagement process for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan residents expressed a need for larger rental units. More diverse housing options would allow families to stay in Brooklyn Center if they chose as their housing needs change. In fact, the City sees a drop in population relative to Hennepin County in residents aged 45 to 65. This is due to residents moving out to find alternative housing options as their families grow. The proposed project would provide a housing type that would fulfill a segment of this current housing gap in the community. Since 2010, the number of households with children in both single-parent and married couple households has grown significantly, and the percentage of Brooklyn Center households with children is approaching 40 percent, which is well above the rate in Hennepin County and the metro area. Unlike the surrounding region, the median age of Brooklyn Center residents is younger, at 32.8 years old. This is largely due to a significant increase in residents aged 25 to 34, who oftentimes are starting families and having children. The Metropolitan Council projects that the City of Brooklyn Center will add nearly 2,000 new households to the community between 2020 and 2040. Given that the City is mostly built out, it is expected that a substantial portion of future housing would be provided in the form of multi-family units. Residents also communicated a desire to have housing options that were closer to supportive retail, commercial, and services so that they could walk, bike, or easily use transit to meet their needs. REQUESTS The nature of the Applicant’s requests would require approval of a preliminary and final plat to accommodate the anticipated site improvements and triplex buildings, the establishment of a Planned Unit Development to offer certain flexibility for the intended use and alignment with the recently adopted 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and approval of a site and building plan, as all properties above an R2 (One and Two Family Residence) District use require one. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT The proposed preliminary and final plat for what would be known as ROBERTSON AND BREKKE’S BROOKLYN BOULEVARD FIRST ADDITION would subdivide four (4) existing Economic Development Authority (EDA) of Brooklyn Center lots into seven (7) new parcels and an outlot to accommodate the App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 6 seven (7) proposed triplexes at the Subject Property located south of 61st Avenue North and west of Brooklyn Boulevard. City staff is requesting that the plat be updated to absorb the proposed south outlot into lot #7. As all the new lots will contain segments of drive aisle and on-site parking, the Applicant should be consistent in combining lot #7 and the south outlot. This will also provide clarity in terms of maintenance should the Applicant ever sell the Subject Property. Per comments #44 through #48 provided in the memorandum by Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg and dated August 4, 2020 (Exhibit D), the Applicant will need to address edits necessary to reflect vacated easements, proposed easements, existing and proposed utilities, and all associated easement documents for City review. A 10 foot drainage and utility easement is required for dedication around the entire perimeter of the Subject Property. An additional utility easement shall be dedicated on the plat to allow for any future maintenance of private water mains and sanitary sewer per Development Agreement requirements. The Applicant will need to submit legal descriptions and easement vacations for all existing easements and certain vacations of existing public easements, as determined by the City. The Applicant shall also provide and maintain a current abstract of title for City Attorney review. Following a review of the submitted final plat, the title block shall be updated to reflect “Brooklyn Center, Minnesota,” and “City Council of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota.” The submitted plat currently displays “Bloomington” in the text. The title block should also contain an attest section for the City Clerk. Based on the above noted findings and conditions above, City staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the requested approval of a preliminary and final plat for ROBERTSON AND BREKKE’S BROOKLYN BOULEVARD FIRST ADDITION for the Subject Property located on what is currently known as 6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 Brooklyn Boulevard, subject to the Applicant complying with the Conditions of Approval as noted below, and the related requests for the approval of a site and building plan and establishment of a Planned Unit Development. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The Subject Property is currently zoned a mix of C1 (Service/Office), R5 (Multiple Family Residence) and R1 (One Family Residence) Districts. The Applicant is requesting the property be re-zoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to accommodate the intended site improvements and housing product, which would offer three (3) dwelling units in each of the seven (7) proposed triplex buildings. PUDs grant flexibility within the Zoning Code to allow for developments which would not be allowed under the existing regulations. PUDs are often used to achieve a higher quality development, or achieve other City goals, in exchange for granting zoning flexibility from the City Code. Section 35-355 (Planned Unit Development) of the City Zoning Code notes that upon the rezoning for a PUD, the district shall be designated by the letters “PUD” followed by the alphanumeric designation of the underlying zoning district, which may be either the prior zoning classification or a new classification. Given that the major update to the City Zoning Code is currently underway and changes to districts are anticipated in order to align with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the request would be to re-zone following guidance from the 2040 Comprehensive Plan future land use designations for the Subject Property. App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 7 PUDs may only contain uses consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the uniqueness of each PUD requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities, public facilities, and the approval of a land subdivision may be subject to modifications from the City ordinances generally governing them— essentially the City Council may approve plans that are not in compliance with the usual specifications or ordinance requirements where it is found that such are not required in the interests of residents or the City, although plans shall comply with all watershed, state, and federal storm water, erosion control, and wetlands requirements. Therefore, the proposed rezoning would be to PUD-NMU (Neighborhood Mixed Use). “Neighborhood Mixed Use” is a new future land use designation that guides surrounding key neighborhood intersections for a mix of residential, retail, and commercial/office uses. This designation plans for the redevelopment of existing uses and assumes that a minimum of 50% of the land within this designation would be used for residential purposes, at densities between 15.01 to 31 dwelling units per acre, and the remaining areas under this land use designation would be developed with neighborhood scale retail, service, and commercial uses. The designation allows for mixed uses on each parcel, but does not require it. The Subject Property is currently comprised of three different future land use designations (refer to Map 2 below), but the Applicant is requesting a re-plat of said properties to accommodate the requested triplex development. As such, City staff reviewed the density ranges allowed within each of the three (3) future land use designations: Neighborhood Mixed Use (15.01-31 DU/Acre), High Density Residential (15.01-31 DU/Acre), and Low Density Residential (LDR @ 3.01-5 DU/Acre). With 1.1 acres of the total Subject Property designated at 15.01-31 DU/Acre, there could be between 17 to 34 units on-site. The remaining 0.55 acres (3.01-5 DU/Acre) could support between 2 and 3 dwelling units for a range of 19 to 37 units on the entire Subject Property. As submitted, the proposal calls for the construction of 21 total units on the Subject Property, which falls within the lower end of the range noted above. Map 2. Future Land Use Designations (2040 Comprehensive Plan) App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 8 The front setbacks requested under the application are generally less than what is allowed by Code for residential properties along a major thoroughfare (50 feet), which would severely limit development of the Subject Property, and the proposed front porches would therefore encroach closer to the property lines than is typically permitted. However, the proposed setbacks align with the guidance of the Comprehensive Plan to bring buildings closer to the corridor, provide parking in the rear, and create a more walkable, pedestrian friendly environment. A typical residential property not located on a major thoroughfare, be it single family or multi-family, requires a 35 foot front yard setback. The proposal also requests a higher percentage of three (3) bedroom units than is typically called for in the Zoning Code (no more than 10-percent); however, there are instances of multi-family dwelling units providing three (3) bedroom rental products at select multi-family properties in the City, such as Georgetown, Emerson Chalet, and Victoria Townhomes. The PUD proposal is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan in that it would align with the City’s strategic goal of Targeted Redevelopment by providing a type of mid-market housing that would fill a need in the community for larger unit rental dwelling units. The type of product proposed within this development would feature three (3) bedroom units with an estimated rent of between $1,850 to $2,200 per month, although these numbers have yet to be finalized. The Applicant is not requesting any municipal subsidy at this time, and has indicated plans to set aside 20% of the total units for Section 8 Voucher holders. The anticipated rents are considered affordable to those making 70-80% Area Median Income (AMI). As approval of any development plan for the Subject Property shall constitute a rezoning to PUD, approvals to establish a PUD require the City Council to base its actions on the rezoning under the following criteria: 1. Compatibility of the plan with the standards, purposes, and intent of this section (Section 35- 355); 2. Consistency of the plan with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; 3. The impact of the plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located; and 4. The adequacy of internal site organization, uses, densities, circulation, parking facilities, public facilities, recreational areas, open spaces, and buffering and landscaping. Based on the above noted findings and conditions above, City staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the requested establishment of a Planned Unit Development to allow for the re-zoning of the Subject Property, located on what is currently known as 6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 Brooklyn Boulevard, to be re-zoned to PUD-NMU (Planned Unit Development-Neighborhood Mixed Use) District, subject to the Applicant complying with the Conditions of Approval as noted below, and the receiving approvals for the related preliminary and final plat and site and building plans. SITE AND BUILDING PLAN The Applicant submitted plans for review as part of their proposal, along with a stormwater management plan, landscape plan, architectural renderings, and civil set containing utility, grading, drainage, and site plans. City staff reviewed the plans that were submitted and have provided comments for this report below: Site Design The proposed south site, located within the 6000 block of Brooklyn Boulevard, just south of the App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 9 Sanctuary of Brooklyn Center and 61st Avenue North, and west of Brooklyn Boulevard, proposes construction of seven (7) triplexes on approximately 1.65 acres. Each unit would contain a garden (or basement unit), a ground (main) level unit, and an upper level unit. As proposed, each triplex building would be approximately 3,885 feet in size, and provide approximately 1,295 square feet of living space per unit. Setbacks All setbacks in the proposal are measured from the right-of-way (ROW), which will be altered as part of the Phase II Brooklyn Boulevard Project scheduled to begin in 2021. The Applicant worked with City consultant SRF to obtain the revised County right-of-way specifications in advance of the Phase II construction, as they will impact the Subject Property. The chart below compares the current setback requirements with the requested standards for the proposed PUD. The underlying “Neighborhood Mixed Use” designation is a new designation that is not currently reflected in the Zoning Code; however, a major update to the Zoning Code is underway. In reviewing the typical setbacks for a medium density residential product (R3 and R4 Districts under current Zoning Code), City staff finds the following: Table 1. Setback Flexibility Requests Current Standard Requested Flexibility Front Yard Setback 50 feet (major thoroughfares) 35 feet (from front wall) Note: Minimum 25 foot setback assuming maximum 10 foot porch encroachment under Zoning Code 23-31 feet (from front wall) 17-25 feet (from covered porch) Interior Yard Setback 10 feet -- Corner Yard Setback 25 feet -- Rear Yard Setback 40 -- The requested range of front yard setbacks is due to the uniqueness of the Subject property, which staggers in overall lot depth along Brooklyn Boulevard. The north portion of the Subject Property is able to retain greater front yard setbacks due to the existing lots being deeper, as the lots were formerly home to an office building and small apartment complex. The south portion of the Subject Property becomes shallower as the lots were previously the sites of two single family homes. Between the anticipated construction start of the Phase II Brooklyn Boulevard reconstruction and modernization project, scheduled to begin in 2021, and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives, the intent has been to create a more walkable, transit connected, and experience-based place. Phase II of the Brooklyn Boulevard Project is intended to enhance bicycle and pedestrian travel by adding trail, improving sidewalks, transit stops, adding streetscaping and landscaping, and improving the overall functionality of intersections. As proposed, the existing sidewalk located along the eastern edge of the Subject Property would be converted from sidewalk to trail, which requires the acquisition of additional right-of-way. As the Subject Property is located within the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor and given the overarching desire to connect properties to the aforementioned amenities, City staff is comfortable with the App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 10 proposed setbacks, particularly as the Brooklyn Boulevard project is requiring additional right-of-way to accommodate the trail that would run adjacent to the proposed triplexes. Furthermore, the positioning of the triplexes closer to the roadway and trail enhances the walkability for residents who might potentially reside in one of the triplexes. This is as opposed to creating a more car-oriented feel by positioning a parking lot in front of the building, thus requiring potential residents to navigate the parking lot before entering their homes. Further, it is anticipated that the future Neighborhood Mixed Use zoning district will encourage shorter front yard setbacks along Brooklyn Boulevard to maximize setbacks from adjacent single family homes to the rear and encourage more walkability. Architectural Materials At this time, the City references a set of architectural design guidelines based off the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. To that end, the building materials referenced are typically intended for more commercial type projects (e.g. glazing, brick, stucco). Per the Applicant, the intent is to utilize James Hardie lap siding with aluminum soffits and fascia. The front stoops on each triplex would utilize cedar decking or similar and offer a concrete patio on the rear of each building. Each unit would be fitted with custom cabinetry with solid core doors and luxury vinyl tile flooring. The garden (basement) units would feature a large daylit window well running almost the entirety of the building width, while the main floor units would feature a front porch facing Brooklyn Boulevard. The Applicant also proposes to install a patio on the rear of each triplex building and provide grills. The Applicant has noted a desire to also offer community garden space on-site, and the proximity to neighboring Wangstad Park would offer residents with access to a playground, basketball court, and picnicking area. City staff indicated that the Applicant should strive to create a uniqueness about each building so as to create some vibrancy along the Boulevard through the use of differing roof pitches, siding colors, etc. The Applicant indicated that this was their intent. Image 1. Renderings of Proposed Triplex Buildings App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 11 Image 2. Example Main (1st) Floor Unit Access and Parking The Applicant proposes to install a driveway access off 61st Avenue North. Said access would run south along the western edge of the Subject Property before heading to a secondary right exit-only drive off Brooklyn Boulevard. As the driveway and parking will cross through all seven (7) new lots, the Applicant App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 12 will need to have cross access agreements in place. As proposed, the drive aisle would be 24 feet wide, which is the minimum required for two-way traffic and 90-degree parking. The Applicant notes 18 foot deep parking spaces, which is the minimum required, but will need to ensure each parking space is a minimum of 8.66 feet in width or the 9 foot typical width. Assuming a total of 21 dwelling units, the Applicant would need to provide a minimum of two (2) spaces per dwelling unit, or 42 on-site parking spaces. The Applicant initially provided for the minimum required on-site parking, but upon revising the site plan to incorporate trash enclosures the parking fell below minimum requirements. City staff is requesting the Applicant relocate the south trash enclosure to the west grassy median located at the rear of the southernmost triplex building. By relocating the trash enclosure, the Applicant will be able to recoup some parking spaces, and address City Code requirements that trash enclosures be located behind the front yard setbacks. The Applicant may also be able to achieve additional parking by removing a median or two in the rear parking area. Per Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg, the recommendation is to relocate any medians so as to align with the proposed individual lot lines. Refer to Image 3. Image 3. Submitted Site Plan for 6000 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 13 The Applicant will need to install sidewalk along the parking areas to allow for access to the sidewalks leading to each respective triplex building. This will require the proposed landscaping to be shifted elsewhere on the site (e.g. between buildings) and the landscape plan updated. City staff participated in a series of conversations with Hennepin County regarding the proposed drive access off Brooklyn Boulevard, as the long term goals of Brooklyn Boulevard have included the limiting of access and consolidation of driveway curb cuts, which is a County road. As part of the EDA acquisition of these properties, existing curb cuts were taken off line. The request from the Applicant is to install an access off 61st Avenue North and another access off Brooklyn Boulevard. The County has indicated that a right only exit, rather than a full access onto Brooklyn Boulevard would be acceptable. By providing a right out only exit, garbage trucks and any potential emergency vehicles would be able to navigate the site without having to attempt a turnaround. Additionally, the right out only aligns with both City and County desires to limit turns on Brooklyn Boulevard. Both City and County staff indicated the preference of a raised concrete median, similar to a “porkchop” to guide motorists into the right out only exit onto Brooklyn Boulevard and requested signage be installed. The County noted that the preference would be to locate the proposed right out only further to the north (between 6031 and 6037 Brooklyn Boulevard); however, this alteration would have substantial impacts to the usability of the site as currently proposed (i.e. seven triplexes and all associated site improvements). Pending any approval of the application, the Applicant and City will need to work with the County to address the access needs. The Subject Property is located in proximity to an existing bus stop located at the northeast corner of the site, at 61st Avenue North and Brooklyn Boulevard. Said transit stop serves local bus route 723, which offers direct connections to the Brooklyn Center Transit Center, North Hennepin Community College, and Starlite Transit Center in Brooklyn Park. Trash, Screening, and Lighting As mentioned above, City staff is requesting that the south trash enclosure be pulled back from in front of the building line of the southernmost triplex building and relocated west, towards the grassy median at the junction of the driveway aisle. Said trash enclosure shall be fully screened per City Code requirements with opaque front doors. Refer to Image 4 below. Image 4. Current Location of South Trash Enclosure. App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 14 Given the higher intensity residential use on the Subject Property in relation to the adjacent single family homes located to the west and south, the Applicant will be required to install a buffer. The Applicant has indicated installation of a fence along the west and south portions of the Subject Property on their submitted site plan. Due to buffering provisions found in Section 35-410, which addresses the special requirements of medium and higher density multi-family residential districts (R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7 Districts), City staff is requesting installation of a minimum 6-foot opaque fence that is in harmony with the surrounding residential neighborhood and provides sufficient screening of the triplexes and specifically drive aisles and parking, from the adjacent single family homes. A photometric/lighting plan was not provided as part of the submittal. Per the Zoning Code, “all exterior lighting shall be provided with lenses, reflectors, or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the property of the owner or operator of said illumination devices.” Additionally, glare shall not emanate from or be visible beyond the boundaries of the illuminated premises. Section 35-712 (Lighting) of the City Zoning Code further specifies that lighting shall not exceed ten (10) foot candles when measured at the property lines abutting the street right-of-way or non-residentially zoned properties or three (3) foot candles for residentially zoned properties. Given the presence of single family homes along the west and south property lines, the Applicant should be cognizant to provide sufficient lighting for residents navigating the parking lot at night or accessing the trash enclosures. This might perhaps be achieved through pedestrian level lighting that can provide sufficient illumination for residents to navigate to their respective homes. Additionally, lighting should be provided for each exterior door. The Applicant may also want to work with the City to determine anticipated improvements, including lighting upgrades and plantings, along Brooklyn Boulevard. Landscaping The project submittal includes a detailed landscape plan, which illustrates the proposed planting schedule (i.e., trees, shrubs, annuals/perennials, mature size, planting size, root conditions). Although City Code does not have any specific requirements on plant species, the City has operated under and held new and redeveloped areas to complying with the City’s adopted Landscape Point System policy, which assigns points to a given site based on the acreage of a development. The point system requires Multi-Family Residential sites to provide a specific amount or number of landscaping units, and is based on the maximum percentage of certain materials (i.e., 50% shade trees; 40% coniferous trees; 35% decorative trees; and 25% shrubs). Table 2. Landscaping Point System Policy Calculations for Subject Property Planting Type Minimum Size Points Per Planting Maximum Points (%) Points Accrued Shade Trees 2 ½” diameter 10 50% or 45 points (6 trees x 10 = 60) Coniferous Trees 5’ height 6 40% or 36 points (5 trees x 6 = 30) Decorative Trees 1” diameter 1.5 35% or 31.5 points (1 tree x 1.5 = 1.5) Shrubs 12” diameter 0.5 25% or 22.5 points (42 shrubs x 0.5 = 21) Total 100% (90 point min.) 97.5 points Assuming a Multi-Family Residential use, the Subject Property would need to provide a minimum of 90 points under the City’s Landscape Point System Policy. As provided, the Landscape Plan provides for 97.5 App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 15 points, which is above and beyond the minimum requirements. City staff reviewed the proposed showy mountain ash tree, which is a decorative (or ornamental) tree, and found that it is native to the northern North American climates and does not appear to be susceptible to the Emerald Ash Borer, as it is not a “true” ash tree. This tree may need to be relocated outside the designated sight triangle due to its corner location. Although not indicated on the submitted Landscape Plan and not counted in the Landscape Point System Policy, the Applicant should look for opportunities to plant perennial grasses or flowers along the triplex buildings, particularly near the front covered porches and in-between buildings for curb appeal. Furthermore, there may be opportunities for some plantings within the five (5) foot green strip between the fencing and drive aisles. If the south trash enclosure is relocated to the west grassy median, some proposed plantings (i.e. Cupressina Norway Spruce, Techny Arborvitae) may need to be relocated elsewhere on site and an updated landscape plan provided. The Applicant should ensure that any plantings located near the two driveways do not block visibility off 61st Avenue North and Brooklyn Boulevard. All green areas on the site will be sodded except in areas where viable turf exists and is totally undisturbed by construction. The burden will be on the developer to prove at the time of a site inspection that the groundcover has been properly maintained and restored. The Planting Notes on the submitted Landscape Plan indicate that any existing boulevard trees would be fenced off and protected during construction. As noted in the Irrigation Notes on the submitted Landscape Plan, the contractor would be responsible for providing an irrigation layout plan to the City pending submittal of any building permits for the proposed project. Safety and Security The Applicant should work with the Brooklyn Center Police Department to identify opportunities to provide sufficient security measures for each of the proposed triplexes. In the cases of multi-family residential properties, the Zoning Code outlines special requirements under Section 35-410 (Special Requirements in R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7 Districts). Such requirements include the installation of an approved security system to control access within each multiple family building, such as locked building entrances or foyer doors, and locked doors leading from hallways to individual units. Dead-latch type locks shall be provided with lever or door knobs on the inside of building entrance doors that can be locked from the inside and outside. Engineering Review Andrew Hogg, Assistant City Engineer, reviewed plans and provided a memorandum and a redlined set of plans, dated August 4th, 2020 (Exhibit D). All engineering comments must be addressed prior to the issuance of any permits for land disturbing activity. It should be noted that an as-built survey will be required upon project completion, and inspection for the private site improvements is to be performed by the Applicant’s design/project engineer with certification required upon project completion. The Applicant will need to work with the City and County to obtain and address any and all requirements and permitting prior to beginning work, including a cross access agreement, and Utility Facilities Easement Agreement. The final plat shall be recorded at the County prior to issuance of any permits. App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 16 Fire Inspection/Building Review Building Official Dan Grinsteinner and Fire Inspector Brandon Gautsch reviewed the submitted plans. Per Dan Grinsteinner’s memo, dated August 4, 2020 (Exhibit E), the Applicant will need to submit for a SAC (Sewer Accessibility Charge) determination to the Metropolitan Council. No building permits shall be issued until any SAC charges are determined and paid for upon release of building permits. In addition, a City SAC/WAC (Water Accessibility Charge) fee will be due. As the buildings are considered “Group R2,” the Applicant will need to provide for accessible units, and an accessible route shall be provided from any and all public transportation stops, accessible parking, accessible passenger loading zones, and public streets or sidewalks to any required accessible building entrances. Although each building is considered to be a “Group R2,” the buildings are not required to be sprinklered as they are under 4,500 square feet in size, so long as all Fire Code requirements relating to access are met. To that end, fire hydrants shall be provided in instances where they are not already in existence or in compliance with Fire Code. Based on the above noted findings and conditions above, City staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the requested site and building plan for the Subject Property located on what is currently known as 6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 Brooklyn Boulevard, subject to the Applicant complying with the Conditions of Approval as noted below, and the receiving of approvals for the related preliminary and final plat and establishment of a Planned Unit Development. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Staff recommends the following conditions be attached to any positive recommendation on the approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2020-004 for the Subject Property located within the 6000 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard and comprised of Anticipated Permitting 1. The Applicant shall apply for and receive a City Land Disturbance permit prior to commencing any grading or land clearance activities on the site. 2. The Applicant shall apply for and receive an NPDES permit from the MPCA. 3. The Applicant shall obtain any required permits from Hennepin County for work in the County right-of-way. 4. The Applicant shall meet all requirements of the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission, as specified by the City. 5. The Applicant shall apply for and receive all applicable City building permits prior to commencing construction of any work. 6. Other permits not listed may be required and is the responsibility of the developer to obtain and warrant. 7. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of applicable building and land disturbance permits. 8. A preconstruction conference must be scheduled and held with City staff and other entities designated by the City. Plat Review 9. Approval of the preliminary and final plats are contingent upon the addressing of comments by App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 17 Assistant City Engineer Hogg in his memorandum dated August 4, 2020, consolidation of the south outlot to proposed lot #7, and updating of the title block per City staff comments. 10. Final plat and mylar shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Code of Ordinances (Platting). 11. Any comments and/or requirements as provided by Hennepin County. 12. Any comments and/or requirements from the City Attorney’s office, and specifically regarding an updated certified abstract of title. 13. The successful recording of said plat (mylar) with Hennepin County. PUD / Site Plan Review 14. Any significant changes or modifications made to this request can only be made by an amendment to the approved Planned Unit Development as approved by the City Council. 15. The Applicant shall enter into a Purchase Agreement with the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center prior to the execution of the Final Plat. 16. The Applicant shall enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center prior to the execution of the Final Plat. 17. The Applicant shall enter into a Performance Agreement with supporting financial guarantee approved by the City shall be executed prior to the issuance of any permits. 18. The Applicant shall enter into a Construction Management Plan and Agreement, and a $5,000 escrow deposited, prior to the issuance of a Land Disturbance Permit. 19. The Applicant shall enter into a Public Improvement Agreement prior to the issuance of a Land Disturbance Permit. 20. The Applicant shall enter into a Utility Facilities Easement Agreement prior to the issuance of a Land Disturbance Permit. Engineering Review 21. The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer’s Review memorandum, dated August 4, 2020. a. Final grading, drainage, utility, and erosion control plans and any other site engineering related issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer for City site and building plan approval and prior to the issuance of permits. Fire Inspector/ Building Official Review 22. The Applicant shall work to ensure all applicable 2015 Minnesota Fire Code requirements have been met as part of any plan approval. 23. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 24. The Applicant shall apply for a SAC determination from the Metropolitan Council. Said determination shall be forwarded to the City and paid for upon issuance of any City permits. 25. The Applicant shall work with the Building Official to address all minimum requirements for accessibility as they relate to units, parking, accessible routes, etc. The aforementioned comments are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Other guarantees and site development conditions may be further prescribed throughout the project as warranted and determined by the City. RECOMMENDATION The findings of fact, based on the staff’s review of the submitted plans support a recommendation for App. No. 2020-004 PC 08/13/2020 Page 18 approval of the application. Based on the findings and the above-noted conditions of approval, staff recommends the following motion: Motion to approve a Resolution recommending the City Council approve Planning Commission Application No. 2020-004 for Preliminary and Final Plat, and site and building plan approvals, and the establishment of a Planned Unit Development for the Subject Property located in the 6000 block of Brooklyn Boulevard and known as 6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 Brooklyn Boulevard, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, as amended by the conditions of approval in the resolution. Attachments Exhibit A-Planning Application No. 2020-004 and documentation, submitted by C Alan Homes, LLC, and dated June 15, 2020 Exhibit B- Public Hearing Notice, dated June 25, 2020, as published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post, and updated Public Hearing Notice and one page informational flyer. Exhibit C- 60 Day Review Extension Letter, dated July 7, 2020. Exhibit D- Memorandum and Exhibits, prepared by Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg, and dated August 4, 2020. Exhibit E- Memorandum, prepared by Building Official Dan Grinsteinner, and dated August 4, 2020. tlo O Kt ,-. � ,,,..... 4' •""='*I*""='• CENTER AT THE•Cl:NTER ✓ I . ' . I For Office Use Only Date Received: Date Application Complete: Letter of Completeness: PC App No. 2020 Planning Commission Application Applicant Information: Nam e: C Al an Homes Address:521 5 Terraceview Ln N Plymouth MN 55446 Office Phone: Cell: 763-228-1785 ------------------ Em a i I: nationalchamp55442@yahoo.com FAX: ------------------ Property Owner Information* (if different from Applicant): Name: Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center Property Owner Address: _________________________________ _ Office Phone: __________________ Cell: _________________ _ Email: FAX: ________________ _ Project Information: Provide a general description of your project and request(s): Construction of Seven Tri Plex Units and Associated Site Improvements. Address/Location of Property: 6000 Brookl yn Blvd South Addresses. See attachment sheet Legal Description of Property: ______________________________ _ Application Type (Mark all that Apply) Comprehensive Plan Amendment $1,050 -,,Appeal $200 ,., Rezoning $1,050 , .. .��. Zoning Code Text Amendment $500 Special/Interim Use Permit $250 :'I Special/Interim Use Permit Amendment $150 ✓Site and Building Plan Review $750 i:l ., Variance $200 , ✓Planned Unit Development $1,800 Planned Unit Development Amendment $700 ..✓Preliminary Plat $400 ,. ✓ Final Plat $200 c,;,. IMPORTANT: All applications may be subject to additional fees for reimbursement of costs incurred by the City for filing, reviewing, and processing applications in the form of an escrow to the City. Application Fee: $3,150 Escrow Amount: $1 000 Receipt No: 2020-004 Exhibit A 06/15/2020 Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C : \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 0 0 0 - C O V R . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1 : 1 P L O T D A T E : 7 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 8 P M 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200504 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 07/23/20 BJL C000 CIVIL COVER SHEET BJL 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H BJL PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR PROJECT CONTACTS SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES HAS BEEN DESIGNATED UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL 'C'. THESE QUALITY LEVELS WERE DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02. ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA". VICINITY MAP GENERAL SITE WORK NOTES 1. ALL STOCKPILES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OR DESIGNATED STAGING AREAS. 2. ALL CONTROL OF WATER AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE SEQUENCED, INSTALLED, AND MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 3. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) FOR THE PROJECT. SEE SWPPP PLAN AND NOTES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 4. ALL PUBLIC ROADWAYS AND PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS INSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL REMAIN OPEN FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHOWN IS BASED ON A SITE SURVEY PERFORMED BY W BROWN LAND SURVEYING IN 2020. GENERAL EARTHWORK NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF TREES/SHRUBS NOT MARKED FOR REMOVAL, INCLUDING MINIMIZING DISTURBANCE OF SOILS WITHIN THE TREES' DRIPLINE ZONES. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT STOCKPILE MATERIAL INSIDE THE TREE DRIPLINES. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES NOT BEING MARKED FOR REMOVAL. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL DEMOLITION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY WORK WITH OWNER. 4. NO CONCRETE OR RUBBLE SHALL BE BACKFILLED ONSITE. BURNING OF DEBRIS ON SITE SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. 6000 BROOKLYN BLVD TRI-PLEX DEVELOPMENT BROOKLYN CENTER, MN SITE, GRADING, DRAINAGE, EROSION CONTROL, AND UTILITIES FOR OWNER CURT BREKKE C. ALEN HOMES 5215 TERRACEVIEW LANE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 (612) 282-7546 OFFICE CIVIL ENGINEER BENJAMIN LUCAS, PE SOLUTION BLUE, INC. 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651)294-0038 OFFICE PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT LOCATION SHEET INDEX SHEET NO.DESCRIPTION C000 CIVIL COVER SHEET C100 EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLAN C200 SWPPP NARRATIVE C201 SWPPP NARRATIVE C202 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS C210 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL - PHASE I C211 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL - PHASE II C300 CIVIL SITE PLAN C400 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C500 UTILITY PLAN C900 SITE DETAILS C901 UTILITY DETAILS C902 UTILITY DETAILS C903 BMP DETAILS ||| | | | | | | | | | REMOVE TREE (TYP.) CLEAR AND GRUB WOODED AREA DO NOT DISTURB NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES DURING CLEARING & GRUBBING ACTIVITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE INFLICTED TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. PROTECT POWER POLE IN PLACE REMOVE 45 LF± CURB & GUTTER AND SAWCUT PAVEMENT 2' FROM CURB REMOVE & REPLACE 500 SF± PAVEMENT FOR UTILITY CONNECTION PROTECT ELECTRICAL UTILITIES AND HYDRANT IN PLACE SALVAGE BUS BENCH AND COORDINATE WITH CITY CLEAR AND GRUB WOODED AREA REMOVE TREE CLUMPS (TYP.) PROTECT POWER POLE AND GUY WIRE IN PLACE DO NOT DISTURB NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES DURING CLEARING & GRUBBING ACTIVITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE INFLICTED TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. PROTECT TREE REMOVE 500 LF± OF CURB & GUTTER REMOVE & REPLACE 500 SF± PAVEMENT FOR UTILITY CONNECTION REMOVE 2,800 SF± SIDEALK. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PROTECTED ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN ROUTE APPROVED BY THE CITY DURING PUBLIC SIDEWALK DISTURBANCE COORDINATE AND CONFIRM DEMOLITION LIMITS IN ROW WITH CITY BEFORE STARTING WORK SAWCUT & REMOVE 1,120 SF± CONCRETE PAVEMENT PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C: \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 1 0 0 - E C & R E M . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1: 1 P L O T D A T E : 7/ 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 8 P M ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE SBI N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200504 07/23/20 BJL C100 EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLAN BJL COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) GENERAL SITE DEMOLITION AND CLEARING NOTES: LEGEND EXISTING PROPERTY LINE REMOVALS LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR 802 800 CURB & GUTTER STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN | DRAINTILE GAS LINE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE SWALE SPOT ELEVATION FLARED END SECTION OUTLET 800.00 RIP RAP SIGN & BOLLARD ADA PAVEMENT MARKING BUILDING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC FLARED END SECTION INLET CO LIGHT POLE SOIL BORINGS PARKING STALL COUNT CURB AND GUTTER REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BUILDING REMOVAL SAWCUT REMOVE PIPE TREE PROTECTION REMOVAL REMOVAL CONCRETE REMOVAL BJL 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C: \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 2 0 0 - E R O S . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1: 1 P L O T D A T E : 7/ 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 9 P M 200504 07/23/20 BJL C200 SWPPP NARRATIVE BJL COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) IS REQUIRED FOR THE GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (NPDES PERMIT) AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS). IN ADDITION TO THE SWPPP, AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA NPDES PERMIT IS INCLUDED IN THIS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT. PROJECT NAME:6000 BROOKLYN BLVD TRI-PLEX DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION:LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF 61ST AVE N AND BROOKLYN BLVD SITE ADDRESS:6000 BROOKLYN BLVD CITY:BROOKLYN CENTER STATE:MINNESOTA ZIP CODE:55429 COUNTY:HENNEPIN LATITUDE:43.0653°W (DECIMAL) LONGITUDE:-93.3260°N (DECIMAL) THIS PROJECT INCLUDES REPLATTING AND DEVELOPING THE 4 PROPERTIES AT THE INTERSECTION OF 61ST AVE N AND BROOKLYN BLVD, AND CONSTRUCTING A 7 UNIT TRIPLEX WITH ADJACENT SIDEWALKS, PATIOS, AND PARKING. A DRIVE LANE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH UTILITIES. FILTER STRIPS, OVERSIZED PERFORATED PIPES, AND INFILTRATION BASINS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT.. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION START DATE: XX-XX-XXXX ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION END DATE: XX-XX-XXXX B.REGULATORY CONTEXT: PLACEMENT OF FILL IN WATERS OF THE STATE: N/A DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA: N/A SPECIAL/IMPAIRED WATERS: 1.SHINGLE CREEK (COUNTY DITCH 15) - RIVER: IMPAIRED FOR BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE BIOASSESSMENTS; CHLORIDE; DISSOLVED OXYGEN; ESCHERIA COLI 2.UPPER TWIN LAKE - LAKE: IMPAIRED FOR MERCURY IN FISH TISSUE; NUTRIENTS; PCB IN FISH TISSUE; PFOS IN FISH TISSUE C.SOILS, SLOPES VEGETATION, AND CURRENT DRAINAGE PATTERNS 1.THE SOILS ONSITE ARE MOSTLY URBAN LAND-HUBBARD COMPLEX SOILS, WELL DRAINED, SANDY LOAM TYPE A SOILS. 2.GRADES GENERALLY SPLIT THE PROPERTIES WEST TO EAST, DRAINING TO THE WESTERN PROPERTY FENCE AND TO THE STORM SEWER IN BROOKLYN BLVD, RESPECTIVELY. 3.DRAINAGE PATTERNS WILL BE GENERALLY MAINTAINED FOR PROPOSED CONDITIONS. SURFACE RUNOFF FROM THE DRIVEWAY AND FRONT YARD AREAS WILL BE ROUTED THROUGH A SYSTEM OF FILTER STRIPS, INFILTRATION BASINS AND OVERSIZED STORAGE PIPES THAT ULTIMATELY DISCHARGE TO THE STORM SEWER IN 61ST AVE N. THE RUNOFF FROM THE REAR YARDS WILL FLOW THROUGH A FILTER STRIP BEFORE SURFACE DRAINING INTO THE CURB & GUTTER AND STORM SEWER IN BROOKLYN BLVD. GRADING OUTSIDE THE DRIVE AND YARD AREAS WILL MATCH EXISTING FLOW PATTERNS. 4.THE EXISTING SITE IS SHORT GRASS COVERED WITH SOME TREES. VEGETATION IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WILL BE REMOVED, AND SITE WILL BE REVEGETATED AFTER CONSTRUCTION AND PAVING ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED PER THE LANDSCAPING PLANS. 5.THE AVERAGE TOTAL ANNUAL PRECIPITATION IS ABOUT 28.32 INCHES. OF THIS, ABOUT 17.31 INCHES (61%) USUALLY FALL IN MAY THROUGH SEPTEMBER. THE AVERAGE ANNUAL SNOWFALL IS 57.3 INCHES. D.STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES: 1.THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OF CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMP'S AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCT INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ON-SITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAINING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. D.STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING SIZING CRITERIA APPLY TO THE DESIGN OF STORMWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES. N/A INDICATES NOT APPLICABLE OR NOT CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. 1.TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS: N/A 2.PERMANENT WET SEDIMENTATION BASINS: N/A 3.PERMANENT INFILTRATION/FILTRATION BMP: TWO (2) INFILTRATION BASINS, ELEVEN (11) VEGETATED FILTER STRIPS, 180 LF OVERSIZED PERFORATED PIPE. 4.PERMANENT REGIONAL PONDS: N/A 5.ALTERNATIVE METHODS: N/A SEE SHEET XXXX FOR VEGETATED FILTER STRIP, INFILTRATION BASIN & CHAMBER SYSTEM CROSS SECTION DETAILS, CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DESIGN CALCULATIONS. E.SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE DESCRIBES, IN GENERAL, THE WORK ON THE SITE: 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED AND/OR OBTAIN THE NECESSARY PERMITS. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM SITE INSPECTIONS, RECORD KEEPING AND RECORD RETENTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL PERMITS 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT A WRITTEN, NOT ORAL, WEEKLY SCHEDULE OF PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES FOR THE PROJECT ENGINEER'S AND OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE'S APPROVAL. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL PERIMETER AND DOWN-GRADIENT EROSION CONTROL AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S, CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES PRIOR TO SITE GRADING, EXCAVATION, STOCKPILING OR DISTURBING EXISTING VEGETATIVE COVER. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM PHASE I DEMOLITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DEMOLITION PLAN. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM SITE GRADING, EXCAVATION, STOCKPILING WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP). 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL, INSPECT, MONITOR AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL BMPS AS SHOWN ON PLANS & IN CONFORMANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLWING A 0.50 INCH OVER 24 HOUR RAIN EVENT DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION. 8.CONTRACTOR MUST INITIATE SOIL STABILIZATION METHODS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SOIL AND/OR VEGETATION DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES AND MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 7 DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE OR REPAIR EROSION CONTROL AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S THAT ARE NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A STORM EVENT OF AT LEAST 0.50 INCHES. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM PHASE II DEMOLITION IN ACCORDANCE WITHE THE DEMOLITION PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ITEMS 6-9 FOR AREAS BOUND BY PHASE II DEMOLITION WORK, AND FOR ANY REMAINING WORK WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION BOUNDARIES. 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM SITE RESTORATION ACTIVITIES FOR PERMANENT VEGETATIVE ESTABLISHMENT. 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES PRIOR TO SUBMITTING NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT). 13.SUBMIT NOT TO MPCA WITHIN 30 DAYS OF FINAL STABILIZATION. F.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FIELD REQUIREMENTS: ALL FIELD REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP). 1.THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMPLEMENT THE SWPPP AND PROVIDE BMPs IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP IN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTIONAL MANNER. 2.THE CONTRACTOR MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER FROM ADJACENT SURFACE WATERS. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESPOND TO CHANGING SITE CONDITIONS AND IMPLEMENT/SUPPLEMENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES UTILIZED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF DISTURBED SOILS AND ADEQUATE PREVENTION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT OFF-SITE. AT A MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FIELD REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE CAUTION TO MINIMIZE COMPACTION OF SOILS AND RESTRICT VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT USE IN INFILTRATION/FILTRATION BMP AREAS, AND AREAS WHERE FULL VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION WILL OCCUR. 5.AREAS OF COMPACTION SHALL BE UNCOMPACTED TO A DEPTH OF 18 INCHES BEFORE THE PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL. G.EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES: 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT TO PHASE ALL WORK TO MINIMIZE EROSION AND MAINTAIN VEGETATIVE COVER TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE DELINEATED ON THE SITE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. 2.INLET PROTECTION, SILT FENCE, ROCK LOGS, AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN DRAWING, OR AS MODIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER. 3.INLET PROTECTION FOR OFF SITE DRAIN INLETS NOT SHOWN IN THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN WILL BE INSTALLED AS NEEDED. 4.ALL EXPOSED SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY OR NO LATER THAN 7 DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED, INCLUDING STOCKPILES WITH SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS. 5.THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH THAT DRAINS WATER FROM A CONSTRUCTION SITE OR DIVERTS WATER AROUND A SITE MUST BE STABILIZED BY CONTRACTOR WITHIN 200 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE, OR FROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGE TO ANY SURFACE WATER WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCH SWALES BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED UNTIL THEY ARE NO LONGER USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM, AFTER WHICH THEY MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS. 6.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER. 7.ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED PRIOR TO THE ONSET OF WINTER. ANY WORK STILL BEING PERFORMED WILL BE SNOW MULCHED OR SNOW BLANKETED AND SNOW SEEDED. H.SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: 1.CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROLS BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT DISTURBANCE BEGINS. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN PERIMETER CONTROLS UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE GRADING AND BMP INSTALLATION TO LIMIT ALL SLOPES OF 3H:1V OR STEEPER TO AN UNBROKEN LENGTH OF 75 FEET OR LESS. 3.TIMING AND INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES CAN BE ADJUSTED BY CONTRACTOR TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING AND GRUBBING OR VEHICLE PASSAGE. ANY SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY MUST BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED AND IN ALL CASES PRIOR TO THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT. 4.IF PRESENT, ALL STORM SEWER INLETS AND OUTLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY CONTRACTOR WITH APPROPRIATE BMP'S DURING THE WORK. THESE PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL THE POTENTIAL SOURCES FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT TO INLETS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED BY CONTRACTOR. 5.TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS. SOIL STOCKPILES SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN SURFACE WATERS OR STORMWATER CONVEYANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE PROTECTION AROUND THE LIMITS OF ALL TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILE AREAS. ALL SOIL STOCKPILES THAT REMAIN UNDISTURBED FOR A PERIOD GREATER THAN 48 HOURS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY CONTRACTOR WITH COVER OF MULCH, EROSION CONTROL MATS, OR PLASTIC SHEETING. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT MEASURES TO CONTROL VEHICLE TRACKING OFF SITE. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES OR EQUIVALENT SYSTEM MUST BE INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR TO MINIMIZE TRACKING FROM SITE. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS AS REQUIRED BY THE PERMIT. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOIL AND SEDIMENT TRACKED OR OTHERWISE DEPOSITED ON PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PAVEMENT AREAS. REMOVE SOIL AND SEDIMENT ON A DAILY BASIS. STREET WASHING IS ONLY ALLOWED AFTER SWEEPING SEDIMENT FROM THE AREAS. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE SURFACE OF ANY AND ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK AREAS AND HAUL ROADS MOIST BY SPRAYING WITH UNCONTAMINATED WATER AS TO PREVENT AIRBORNE DUST FROM LEAVING THE SITE. THIS MAY INCLUDE SPRAYING AND SWEEPING FINISHED SURFACES ADJACENT TO THE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC, VEHICLE TRAFFIC, AND PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PROPERTIES.THIS RESPONSIBILITY SHALL REQUIRE CONTRACTOR TO SUSPEND CONSTRUCTION OR HAUL TRAFFIC UNTIL SUCH TIME AS CONTRACTOR CAN AND DOES PREVENT AIRBORNE DUST. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OVER SPRAY SO AS TO CREATE PROBLEMS, SUCH AS TRACKING OF MATERIAL ONTO PAVED SURFACES, OR MUDDY HAUL ROADS, DUE TO THE APPLICATION OF EXCESS MOISTURE. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL TREAT ANY SEDIMENT LADEN WATER WITH APPROPRIATE SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT OR FILTER SYSTEM BEFORE DISCHARGING TO THE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM. 11.INFILTRATION BASIN PERIMETER CONTROL AND EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL THE FINAL COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT OR VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED, WHICHEVER IS LATER. 12.INSTALLATION OF INFILTRATION/FILTRATION PRACTICES SHALL BE DONE DURING PERIODS OF DRY WEATHER AND COMPLETED BEFORE A RAINFALL EVENT. 13.EXCAVATION OF INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE COMPLETED USING A BACKHOE WITH A TOOTHED BUCKET. 14.SOILS IN THE INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE LOOSENED UP TO A MINIMUM OF 18" IN DEPTH. 15.THE BOTTOM EXCAVATION SURFACE OF THE INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE LEVEL WITHOUT DIPS OR SWALES. 16.DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE INFILTRATION AREAS, STORMWATER MUST BE ROUTED AROUND THE AREAS UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED AND THE TRIBUTARY SURFACES ARE CLEANED OF SEDIMENT. 17.THE ENGINEERED SOILS WITH IN THE INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL REMAIN UNCONTAMINATED BEFORE AND DURING INSTALLATION . 18.POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS MUST BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER. THE PERMITTEES MUST USE CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO CHEMICAL ADDITION AND MUST DIRECT TREATED STORMWATER TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR FILTRATION OR SETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. I.POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE FOLLOWING POLLUTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON THE SITE: 1.BUILDING PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. PERMITTEES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COVER OR PROTECT PRODUCTS WHICH ARE EITHER NOT A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TO STORMWATER OR ARE DESIGNED TO BE EXPOSED TO STORMWATER. 2.SOLID WASTE: COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT, CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 12.5 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. 3.PERMITTEES MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKED OVER. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7041. 4.HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: OIL, GASOLINE, PAINT AND ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE STORED IN APPROPRIATE CONTAINERS. INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGES. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA REGULATIONS, SEE SECTION 12.4 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. 5.PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS MUST BE PLACED UNDER COVER (PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS, ETC.) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. 6.A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE MUST BE DESIGNATED FOR USE AS A WASH AREA FOR TRUCKS AND OTHER EQUIPMENT. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. 7.CONCRETE WASHOUT CONTAINMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED ON SITE. THE CONTAINMENT METHOD MUST BE LEAK-PROOF WITH AN IMPERMEABLE LINER. OR ALTERNATIVELY, CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL BE PERFORMED AT THE CONCRETE MIX PLANT INSTEAD OF ON-SITE. 8.ANY FUEL OR CHEMICAL TANK STORAGE ON THE PROJECT AREA MUST BE PROTECTED BY A SOIL BERM OR HAVE A NEGATIVE GRADIENT TO ANY WATER RESOURCE AREA. A CONTINGENCY PLAN MUST BE CREATED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN THE EVENT OF A SPILL OR LEAK OF ANY CHEMICAL, INCLUDING PETROCHEMICALS, DEEMED HARMFUL TO THE ENVIRONMENT, AND HAVE ON HAND THE MATERIALS NECESSARY TO CAPTURE AND CONTAIN SAID CHEMICALS. 9.PERMITTEES MUST TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED INCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. PERMITTEES MUST REPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. 115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UP MEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE. J.DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING ALLOWABLE NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES, AS DEFINED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT, ARE LIMITED TO DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING. DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING THAT MAY HAVE TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF THE WATER CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMPS, SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER OR DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT DISCHARGE POINTS DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIPRAP, SAND BAGS, PLASTIC SHEETING OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. ADEQUATE SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED FRO DISCHARGE WATER THAT CONTAINS SUSPENDED SOLIDS. ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING MUST BE DISCHARGED IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE NUISANCE CONDITIONS, EROSION IN RECEIVING CHANNELS OR ON DOWNSLOPE PROPERTIES, OR INUNDATION IN WETLANDS CAUSING SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND. IF THE CONTRACTOR ELECTS TO UTILIZE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THE CONTRACTOR MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURN THE BACKWATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST REPLACE AND CLEAN THE FILTER MEDIA USED IN DEWATERING DEVICES WHEN REQUIRED TO RETAIN ADEQUATE FUNCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A WATER USE (APPROPRIATION) PERMIT FROM THE MN DNR FOR DEWATERING ACTIVITIES THAT WILL WITHDRAW MORE THAN 10,000 GALLONS OF WATER PER DAY OR 1 MILLION GALLONS PER YEAR. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE (1/2) - 6000 BROOKLYN BLVD TRI-PLEX DEVELOPMENT BJL 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C: \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 2 0 0 - E R O S . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1: 1 P L O T D A T E : 7/ 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 9 P M 200504 07/23/20 BJL C201 SWPPP NARRATIVE BJL COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N K.RECORD RETENTION CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP APPROPRIATE RECORDS OF INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, PRECIPITATION AND ALL OTHER RECORDS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT DURING THE DURATION OF THE WORK. THE SWPPP, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THE PORTION OF THE SITE. CONTRACTOR AND OWNER MUST KEEP THE SWPPP ON FILE FOR THREE YEARS AFTER THE SUBMITTAL OF THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION. INCLUDING THE RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. L.NOTICE OF TERMINATION PERMITTEE MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION WITHIN 30 DAYS IF ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: 1.FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ACHIEVED ON ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE FOR WHICH PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ALL TEMPORARY MEASURES SUCH AS SILT FENCE. 2.ANOTHER OWNER HAS ASSUMED CONTROL OVER ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE THAT HAVE NOT ACHIEVED FINAL STABILIZATION. PERMITTEE MUST ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE AND SUBMIT THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION WITHIN 30 DAYS OF FINAL STABILIZATION. FINAL STABILIZATION CAN BE ACHIEVED IN THE FOLLOWING WAY: 1.ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ARE COMPLETE AND A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH A DENSITY OF 70% OVER THE ENTIRE PERVIOUS SURFACE HAS BEEN ACHIEVED, INCLUDING STABILIZATION OF ALL DITCHES AND SWALES. 2.ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT. 3.REMOVAL OF ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC AND STRUCTURAL BMPS. ALTHOUGH BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON SITE MAY BE LEFT IN PLACE IF INDICATED BY THE PLAN. 4.REMOVAL OF SEDIMENT FROM STORM WATER CONVEYANCES AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY BASINS. M.CHANGES TO SWPPP THE PERMITTEE MUST AMEND THE SWPPP AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS, DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER: 1.THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION OR MAINTENANCE. 2.WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS THAT HAVE SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON DISCHARGE. INSPECTION IS REQUIRED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.50 INCHES. 3.INSPECTION OR INVESTIGATION BY SITE OPERATORS, LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE. 4.THE SWPPP IS NOT ACHIEVING THE GENERAL OBJECTIVES OF CONTROLLING POLLUTANTS OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT. 5.THE MPCA DETERMINES THAT DISCHARGE MAY CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO NON-ATTAINMENT OF ANY APPLICABLE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS OR THE SWPPP DOES NOT INCORPORATE THE REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO AN APPROVED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL). N.SWPPP CERTIFICATION THIS STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN WAS PREPARED BY INDIVIDUAL(S) TRAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PERMIT'S TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION OF SWPPPS. INDIVIDUAL(S) PREPARING THIS SWPPP: BENJAMIN LUCAS, PE PROJECT ENGINEER SOLUTION BLUE, INC. blucas@solutionblue.com 651-294-0038 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE (2/2) - 6000 BROOKLYN BLVD TRI-PLEX DEVELOPMENT BJL RESPONSIBLE PERSONS: BELOW IS A LIST OF PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS PROJECT WHO ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS. THEY SHALL OVERSEE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF EROSION PREVENTION, AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS BEFORE AND DURING CONSTRUCTION. CERTIFICATION OF KNOWLEDGE FOR SWPPP TEAM MEMBERS "I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT I UNDERSTAND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT THAT AUTHORIZES THE STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AT THE IDENTIFIED SITE AND THAT I HAVE READ AND WILL FOLLOW THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR THIS PROJECT." GENERAL CONTRACTOR: COMPANY: NAME: TITLE: PHONE: MN CONSTRUCTION SITE MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION EXPIRES (REQUIRED (OR EQUIVALENT)) MN CONSTRUCTION INSTALLER CERTIFICATION EXPIRES (REQUIRED OR REQUIRED BY SUB-CONTRACTOR) SUB-CONTRACTOR (EXCAVATION): COMPANY: NAME:TITLE: PHONE: MN CONSTRUCTION SITE MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION EXPIRES (PREFERRED) MN CONSTRUCTION INSTALLER CERTIFICATION EXPIRES (REQUIRED IF G.C. NOT CERTIFIED) SUB-CONTRACTOR (LANDSCAPING): COMPANY: NAME:TITLE: PHONE: MN CONSTRUCTION SITE MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION EXPIRES (PREFERRED) MN CONSTRUCTION INSTALLER CERTIFICATION EXPIRES (REQUIRED IF G.C. NOT CERTIFIED) SUB-CONTRACTOR (): COMPANY: NAME:TITLE: PHONE: MN CONSTRUCTION SITE MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION EXPIRES (PREFERRED) MN CONSTRUCTION INSTALLER CERTIFICATION EXPIRES (REQUIRED IF G.C. NOT CERTIFIED) SUB-CONTRACTOR (EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTOR): COMPANY: NAME:TITLE: PHONE: MN CONSTRUCTION SITE MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION EXPIRES (PREFERRED) MN CONSTRUCTION INSTALLER CERTIFICATION EXPIRES (REQUIRED IF G.C. NOT CERTIFIED) 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C: \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 2 0 0 - E R O S . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1: 1 P L O T D A T E : 7/ 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 9 P M BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200504 07/23/20 BJL C202 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS BJL COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N SITE LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) USGS MAP (NOT TO SCALE) PROJECT SITE PROJECT SITE PROJECT INFORMATION: BJL GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES: 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H EROSION CONTROL EROS-01 EROSION CONTROL EROS-02 EROSION CONTROL 6" MINIMUM DEPTH EROS-06 EROSION CONTROL EROS-07 EROSION CONTROL EROS-08 EROSION CONTROL EROS-16 EROSION CONTROL EROS-22 EROSION CONTROL EROS-29 1 MILE RADIUS IMPAIRED LAKE: UPPER TWIN LAKE IMPAIRED RIVER: SHINGLE CREEK ||| | | | | | | | | | SF SF S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F SF S F S F S F S F CB INSERT CB INSERT CB INSERT TREE PROTECTION RING CB INSERT PUBLIC ROW IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C: \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 2 0 0 - E R O S . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1: 1 P L O T D A T E : 7/ 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 9 P M ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE SBI N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200504 07/23/20 BJL C210 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL - PHASE I BJL LEGEND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR 802 800 802 800 CURB & GUTTER STORM SEWER DRAINTILE SWALE FLARED END SECTION OUTLET RIP RAP CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INLET PROTECTION BUILDING FLARED END SECTION INLET GUTTER OUT CURB SILT FENCE SF SOIL BORINGS DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW BIO-ROLL ITEM SILT FENCE UNIT LINEAR FEET QUANTITY 1,015 TREE PROTECTION RING EACH 1 CONSTRUCTION ROCK ENTRANCE EACH 1 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE EACH 4 RIP RAP CUBIC YARDS XXX PHASE I EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES BIO LOG LINEAR FEET 30 BJL 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H ||| | | | | | | | | | CO | | // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // / / / / / / // | | | | | | | | | | CO | | CO | CO |CO CO 8 6 0 86 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 859 861 8 6 1 8 6 1 86 1 8 6 1 861 86 1 86 1 8 6 1 8 6 1 861 86 1 8 6 1 86 1 8 6 0 8 5 7 8 5 8 8 5 9 // // // // // // / / // // // // // // // // // // // //// / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ////////////// // // // // SF SF S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F CB INSERT CB INSERT CB INSERT TREE PROTECTION RING CB INSERT SILT FENCE SILT FENCE CB INSERT CB INSERT PROPOSED INFILTRATION AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK OFF, STAKE AND PROTECT FRONT YARD FILTER STRIPS DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT COMPACTION (TYP). PROPOSED INFILTRATION AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK OFF, STAKE AND PROTECT BASIN DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT COMPACTION. PROPOSED INFILTRATION AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK OFF, STAKE AND PROTECT BASIN DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT COMPACTION. PROPOSED INFILTRATION AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK OFF, STAKE AND PROTECT REAR YARD FILTER STRIPS DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT COMPACTION (TYP). CLASS II RIP RAP AT OUTLET CLASS II RIP RAP AT OUTLET CB INSERT PUBLIC ROW IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS PERIMETER CONTROL CAN BE REMOVED ONCE PROPERTY FENCE IS INSTALLED AND PERMANENT COVER IS ESTABLISHED PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C: \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 2 0 0 - E R O S . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1: 1 P L O T D A T E : 7/ 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 9 P M ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE SBI N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200504 07/23/20 BJL C211 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL - PHASE II BJL COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) LEGEND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR 802 800 802 800 CURB & GUTTER STORM SEWER DRAINTILE SWALE WETLAND FLARED END SECTION OUTLET RIP RAP CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INLET PROTECTION BUILDING FLARED END SECTION INLET GUTTER OUT CURB SILT FENCE SF SOIL BORINGS DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW BIO-ROLL ITEM SILT FENCE UNIT LINEAR FEET QUANTITY 975 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SQUARE FEET 1,575 CONSTRUCTION ROCK ENTRANCE EACH 1 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE EACH 9 CL II RIP RAP CUBIC YARDS 2.6 PHASE 2 EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES BIO LOG LINEAR FEET 1,345 BJL 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H PAVEMENT AREA 0.41 AC BUILDING AREA 9,289 SF SEEDING AREA 0.70 AC PRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS 0.00 AC POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS 0.86 AC AREA SUMMARY DISTURBED AREA 1.65 AC CO // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // / / / / / / // CO CO CO CO CO // // // // // // / / // // // // // // // // // // // //// / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ////////////// // // // // VERSA-LOK 5' TALL RETAINING WALL AROUND INFITLRATION BASIN. SEE DETAIL. REMOVE AND REPLACE 61ST AVE N PAVEMENT SECTION IN KIND FOR UTILITY WORK REMOVE AND REPLACE BROOKLYN BLVD PAVEMENT SECTION IN KIND FOR UTILITY WORK PUBLIC ROW IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS (TYP.) RIGHT TURN & EXIT ONLY SIGNAGE DO NOT ENTER SIGNAGE RIGHT TURN & EXIT ONLY SIGNAGE 10' BOULEVARD AND 10' SIDEWALK IN PUBLIC ROW TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS PROPERTY FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG SEE REINFORCED CONCRETE SECTION FOR TRASH PAD SEE TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAIL ON SHEET C900 SEE REINFORCED CONCRETE SECTION FOR TRASH PAD SEE TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAIL ON SHEET C900 COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C: \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 3 0 0 - S I T E . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1: 1 P L O T D A T E : 7/ 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 3 0 P M ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE SBI N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200504 07/23/20 BJL C300 CIVIL SITE PLAN BJL LEGEND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CURB & GUTTER SWALE SIGN & BOLLARD ADA PAVEMENT MARKING STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE PAVING BUILDING LIGHT POLE SOIL BORINGS PARKING STALL COUNT GENERAL GEOMETRIC AND PAVING NOTES: SIGNAGE AND MARKING NOTES: SITE DATA BJL 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H ||| | | | | | | | | | CO | | // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // / / / / / / // | | | | | | | | | | CO | | CO | CO |CO CO 8 6 0 86 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 859 861 8 6 1 8 6 1 86 1 8 6 1 861 86 1 86 1 8 6 1 8 6 1 861 86 1 8 6 1 86 1 8 6 0 8 5 7 8 5 8 8 5 9 860.40860.04 860.20 860.61 860.54 860.74 860.65 859.93 859.57 859.58859.43 859.45 859.62 859.97 860.01 860.03 859.87 860.10 860.06 860.01 859.89 859.84 860.22 860.29 860.28 860.83 860.73 860.30 860.49 860.66 860.50 860.13 859.71 859.89 859.53 859.47 859.57 859.55 859.74 859.43 857.00 859.33 859.43 859.03 859.08 859.57 855.50 860.65 861.53 861.03 861.53 861.03 861.30 860.79 861.30 861.53 860.87 860.80 861.03 861.03 861.53 860.70 860.91 861.09 861.32 860.59 860.82 860.82 861.32 860.53 860.57 861.06 861.29 860.61 860.56 860.79 860.62 860.79 861.29 860.54 860.62 861.29 861.29 860.79 860.69 860.79 861.37 860.75 860.86 860.86 860.62 861.13 861.37 860.81 861.53 861.03 861.03 861.53 861.30 860.80 860.89 860.05 859.97 859.58 TW 860.50 (TYP.) BW 855.50 (TYP.) MA 859.49± MA 859.72± MA 860.25± MA 860.03± MA 859.91± MA 859.88± MA 859.93± MA 860.00± MA 860.03± MA 859.25±MA 859.10± -3.6% -4.2% -5.0% -5.0% -4.9% -4.6% -3.8% -0 . 9 % 0. 6 % -1.0%-1.5% -1.0 % -1.5 % -1.0% -1.5% -0.6% -0.6% - 1 . 0 % - 1 . 5 % -3:1 -3.7% -3.9% -3.0% -2.0% -4.4% -4.6% -12.3% 861.06 // // // // // // / / // // // // // // // // // // // //// / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ////////////// // // // // 860.57 A E O F 8 6 0 . 0 0 CBMH 05 RE: 859.08 IE: 855.00 53 LF 12" STM @ 1.5% 70 LF N-12 36" PERF STORAGE PIPE @ 0.0% SEE DETAIL CBMH 06 RE: 860.20 IE: 855.00 (S) TOP OF 6" WEIR WALL: 857.75 IE: 855.80 (E) OCS 04 RE: 859.70 IE: 855.00 FES 03 IE: 857.02 INFILTRATION BASIN A HWL: 859.94 OUTLET: 859.70 BOTTOM: 857.00 SEE DETAIL CBMH 02 RE: 859.55 IE: 857.08 (W, S) CB 01 RE: 859.47 IE: 857.37 FES 07 IE: 855.00 OCS 08 RE: 860.50 IE: 855.81 SEE DETAIL 9 8 L F 1 2 " S T M @ 0 . 3 % 20 LF 12" STM @ 0.3% 24 LF 12" STM @ 1.8% CONNECT TO EX STM CB IE: 855.39± CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY PIPE INVERT 113 LF N-12 36" PERF STORAGE PIPE @ 0.0% SEE DETAIL INFILTRATION BASIN B HWL: 859.45 OUTLET: 858.70 BOTTOM: 855.50 SEE DETAIL 5' WIDE VEGETATED FILTER STRIP OFFSET 5' FROM REAR PROPERTY LINE (TYP.) SEE DETAIL 10' WIDE VEGETATED FILTER STRIP OFFSET 5' FROM BOC & SIDEWALK (TYP.) SEE DETAIL A A A A A A B B B B B B B EO F 86 0 . 5 B B COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C: \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 4 0 0 - G R A D . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1: 1 P L O T D A T E : 7/ 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 3 0 P M ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE SBI N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200504 07/23/20 BJL C400 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN BJL LEGEND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR 802 800 802 800 CURB & GUTTER STORM SEWER DRAINTILE SWALE SPOT ELEVATION DRAINAGE SLOPE FLARED END SECTION OUTLET 1.0% 800.00800.00 RIP RAP BUILDING FLARED END SECTION INLET GUTTER OUT CURB EOFEMERGENCY OVERFLOW SOIL BORINGS 800.00 GENERAL GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES: KEY NOTES: BJL 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H ||| | | | | | | | | | CO | | // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // / / / / / / // | | | | | | | | | | CO | | CO | CO |CO CO // // // // // // / / // // // // // // // // // // // //// / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ////////////// // // // // SAN MH 01 RE: 859.57 IE: 852.73 (E) OE: 852.63 (S) 2" SAN SERV IE: 853.43 5' FROM HOUSE (TYP.) 2" WM SERV IE: 853.53 5' FROM HOUSE (TYP.) SAN CO 02 RE: 860.87 IE: 853.29 (N) IE: 853.34 (S) OE: 853.19 (W) SAN CO 04 RE: 860.91 IE: 853.30 (N) IE: 853.34 (S) OE: 853.20 (W) SAN CO 06 RE: 860.62 IE: 853.00 (N) IE: 853.04 (S) OE: 852.94 (W) SAN CO 07 RE: 860.69 IE: 853.04 (S) OE: 852.94 (W) SAN CO 08 RE: 859.57 IE: 851.89 (E) OE: 851.79 (SW) SAN CO 07 RE: 860.05 IE: 851.98 (E) OE: 851.88 (W) 7 LF 2" SAN SERV @ 2.0% 5' FROM HOUSE 4 LF 2" SAN SERV @ 2.0% 5' FROM HOUSE 7 LF 2" SAN SERV @ 2.0% 5' FROM HOUSE 4 LF 2" SAN SERV @ 2.0% 5' FROM HOUSE 7 LF 2" SAN SERV @ 2.0% 5' FROM HOUSE 4 LF 2" SAN SERV @ 2.0% 5' FROM HOUSE 4 LF 2" SAN SERV @ 2.0% 5' FROM HOUSE 2" GV 8" x 2" TEE WYE IE: 852.14 2" GV 8" x 2" TEE WYE IE: 851.38 2" GV 8" x 2" TEE WYE IE: 851.12 2" GV 8" x 2" TEE CONNECT TO EX. SAN MH IE: 849.80 93 LF 8" S A N @ 0 . 5 % 82 LF 2" W M S E R V 93 LF 6" SAN @ 1 . 9 % 82 LF 2" WM S E R V 82 LF 2" WM S E R V SAN MH 03 RE: 859.43 IE: 852.09 (N) OE: 851.99 (SE) SAN MH 05 RE: 859.74 IE: 851.77 (NW) OE: 851.67 (S) SAN MH 09 RE: 859.71 IE: 850.80 (N) OE: 850.70 (E) SAN MH 10 RE: 859.57 IE: 850.17 (W) OE: 850.07 (SE) 1 0 8 L F 8 " S A N @ 0 . 5 % 8 " D I P W M 110 LF 6" S A N @ 1 . 0 % 82 LF 2" W M S E R V 2" SAN SERV IE: 853.43 5' FROM HOUSE (TYP.) 2" WM SERV IE: 853.53 5' FROM HOUSE (TYP.) 2" SAN SERV IE: 853.13 5' FROM HOUSE (TYP.)2" WM SERV IE: 853.23 5' FROM HOUSE (TYP.) 2" SAN SERV IE: 853.13 5' FROM HOUSE 2" WM SERV IE: 853.23 5' FROM HOUSE 26 LF 6" SAN @ 1.9% 40 LF 2" SAN @ 2.6% 26 LF 2" SAN @ 2.6% 43 LF 8" SAN @ 0.5% 1 7 4 L F 8 " S A N @ 0 . 5 % 107 LF 8" SAN @ 0.5% 54 L F 8 " S A N @ 0 . 5 % WET TAP INTO EXISTING WATER MAIN 8" GV 8" D I P W M 8 " D I P W M 8" 12.5° BEND 8" 22.5° BEND 8" 22.5° BEND COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C: \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 5 0 0 - U T I L . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1: 1 P L O T D A T E : 7/ 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 3 0 P M ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE SBI N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200504 07/23/20 BJL C500 UTILITY PLAN BJL LEGEND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CURB & GUTTER STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN || DRAINTILE GAS LINE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE SWALE FLARED END SECTION OUTLET RIP RAP BUILDING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC FLARED END SECTION INLET CO CO LIGHT POLE EOFEMERGENCY OVERFLOW SOIL BORINGS ELEV GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: BJL 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C: \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 9 0 0 - D E T L . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1: 1 P L O T D A T E : 7/ 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 3 1 P M BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200504 07/23/20 BJL C900 SITE DETAILS BJL BJL 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H CIVIL SITE SITE-01 HEAVY DUTY (TRUCK ROUTE) NORMAL DUTY CIVIL SITE SITE-04 REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CIVIL SITE SITE-05 SITE-16 CIVIL SITE SITE-17 CIVIL SITE OUTFALL CURB & GUTTER INFALL CURB & GUTTER SITE-30 CIVIL SITE SECTION A-A A ISOMETRIC A SITE-33 CIVIL SITE SITE-31 CIVIL SITE EXPA N S I O N JOIN T EXPA N S I O N JOIN T SITE-37 CIVIL SITE PERSPECTIVE ADA-06 ACCESSIBLITY REQUIRED VEHICLE ID PARKING FOR VIOLATION UP TO $200 FINE VAN ACCESSIBLE SITE-51 CIVIL SITE COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C: \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 9 0 0 - D E T L . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1: 1 P L O T D A T E : 7/ 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 3 1 P M BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200504 07/23/20 BJL C901 UTILITY DETAILS BJL BJL 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H SANITARY SEWER SAN-01 SECTION PLAN SANITARY SEWER SAN-09 SANITARY SEWER SAN-10 SANITARY SEWER SAN-11 SANITARY SEWER SAN-14 SANITARY SEWER SAN-16 WATER MAIN WAT-03 WATER MAIN WAT-04 WATER MAIN WAT-05 WATER MAIN WAT-06 WATER MAIN WAT-09 WATER MAIN WAT-13 COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C: \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 9 0 0 - D E T L . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1: 1 P L O T D A T E : 7/ 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 3 1 P M BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200504 07/23/20 BJL C902 UTILITY DETAILS BJL BJL 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H STORM SEWER STM-03 STORM SEWER STM-04 STORM SEWER STM-05 STORM SEWER STM-08 STORM SEWER STM-12 STORM SEWER STM-18 B A B A 1 4 RIPRAP AT RCP OUTLETS CLASS II d50=6" CLASS III d50=9" CLASS IV d50=12" DIA. ROUND PIPE (IN.)L (FT.) 12" DEPTH RIPRAP (CU.YD.) 18" DEPTH RIPRAP (CU.YD.) 24" DEPTH RIPRAP (CU.YD.) 12 8 1.3 2.1 2.6 15 8 1.7 2.9 3.5 18 10 2.2 3.6 4.4 21 10 2.8 4.6 5.6 24 12 3.5 5.8 6.9 27 12 4.1 6.9 8.3 30 14 5.0 8.3 9.9 36 16 6.6 11.0 13.2 42 18 8.2 13.6 16.4 48 20 10.1 16.8 20.1 STORM SEWER STM-19 COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C: \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 9 0 0 - D E T L . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1: 1 P L O T D A T E : 7/ 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 3 1 P M BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200504 07/23/20 BJL C903 BMP DETAILS BJL BJL 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H GRADING GRAD-01 GRADING GRAD-02 GRADING GRAD-04 4 1 4 1 GRADING GRAD-07 GRADING GRAD-11 PROPOSED BMP DESIGN CALCULATIONS: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BMP-XX CO // // / / // // // // // // // // / / // / / // // // // // // / / // // / / // // // // // / / / / // // // / / // // // / / / / / / / / / / // // CO // // // // // // / / // // // / / // // / / // // // // // // / / // // // // // // | | | | | | | | | | PEBL PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION 07/27/20 PRELIM LANDSCAPE # 01 DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N PRELIM JONATHAN BLASEG 07.27.2020 56714 2023 07/23/20 JB JB JB 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H PEBL DESIGN 3243 Winpark Drive New Hope, MN 55427 t: 763.544.8002 www.pebl.design Scale:01 1/16" = 1' LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN NOTE: 1. ONLY PLANTS THAT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CITY'S POINT SYSTEM ARE SHOWN IN THIS PLAN. 2. THIS LAYOUT SHOULD EQUATE TO 112.5 POINTS, EXCEEDING THE REQUIRED 90 POINTS. MATCH LINE MATCH LINE Scale:02 1/16" = 1' LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN EV-1 04 EV-2 01 EV-2 01 EV-1 06 EV-1 06 EV-1 06 EV-1 06 EV-1 06 ST-2 01 ST-1 01 ST-3 01 ST-1 01 EV-3 01 EV-1 02 EV-1 02 EV-3 01 EV-1 05 EV-02 01 ST-3 01 ST-2 01 OR-1 01 L100 PLANTING LAYOUT: PLAN REVIEW TREE, REFER TO PLANTING PLAN FOR SPECIES, SIZE AND LOCATION DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE (3) PER TREE @ 120 DEGREE INTERVALS, TYPICAL 8' STEEL STAKE DOUBLE SHREDDED HW MULCH @ 3" DEPTH. DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH ROOT FLARE 2"x2" WOOD STAKE SET AT ANGLE PREPARED PLANTING SOIL ROOT BALL, REMOVE CAGE AND PULL BACK TOP 13 OF BURLAP AND TWINE SUBGRADE EDGE CONDITION VARIES NOTE: TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE ILLUSTRATED: IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING 2 x DIA. OF BALL MIN. FLAGGING, 1 PER WIRE 2 x DIA. OF BALL MIN. SHRUB, REFER TO PLANTING PLAN FOR SPECIES, SIZE AND LOCATION SUBGRADE EDGE CONDITION VARIES PREPARED PLANTING SOIL NOTE: HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL, SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTING PIT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION DOUBLE SHREDDED HW MULCH @ 3" DEPTH. DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH SHRUB STEM PRIMARY EDGE OF PLANTING BED SE C O N D A R Y E D G E O F P L A N T I N G B E D D DD D 12 D 12 D PERENNIAL OR GRASS, REFER TO PLANTING PLAN FOR SPECIES, SIZE AND LOCATION SUBGRADE EDGE CONDITION VARIES PREPARED PLANTING SOIL NOTE: HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL AND REMOVE ALL WIRE, PLASTIC, TAGS AND/OR SYNTHETIC MATERIAL FROM PLANTS PRIOR TO PLANTING D= TYPICAL ON CENTER (O.C.) SPACING AS INDICATED IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE DOUBLE SHREDDED HW MULCH @ 3" DEPTH. DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH PLANT STEM PLANT CENTER, TYPICAL 12 " M I N PEBL PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION 07/27/20 PRELIM LANDSCAPE # 01 DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N PRELIM JONATHAN BLASEG 07.27.2020 56714 2023 07/23/20 JB JB JB 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H PEBL DESIGN 3243 Winpark Drive New Hope, MN 55427 t: 763.544.8002 www.pebl.design Scale:01 NTS PLANTING DETAIL: TREE Scale:02 NTS PLANTING DETAIL: SHRUBS Scale:03 NTS PLANTING DETAIL: FORB/GRS GENERAL NOTES 1. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR GRADING, UTILITIES, EROSION CONTROL, HARDCOVER/PARKING LAYOUT, PROJECT EXTENTS/ BOUNDARIES AND DISTURBED SOIL RESTORATION AREAS. 2. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLAN LAYOUT AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN OR INTENT OF THE LAYOUT. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK AND MATERIALS SUPPLIED. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, WALKWAYS, TREES, LAWNS, AND OTHER SITE FEATURES DESIGNATED TO REMAIN DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. 9. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. 10. EXISTING CONTOURS, PAVEMENT, VEGETATION, UTILITIES AND OTHER FEATURES ARE BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE FOR DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT MATERIAL SELECTIONS AND OTHER SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR WARRANTY. UNDESIRABLE PLANT MATERIAL SELECTIONS OR SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. 12. ALL PLANTING BEDS NOT CONTAINED BY STRUCTURES, CURB OR PAVING MUST BE EDGED WITH COMMERCIAL GRADE STEEL EDGING (5" H x 3 16"). 13. ALL EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED AND PROTECTED (SEE L000) (EXISTING TREES ARE DRAWN AT NORMAL MATURE CROWN DIAMETER AND THIS DOES NOT REFLECT EXISTING CROWN SIZES, SEE SURVEY). PLANTING NOTES 1. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED HEIGHT. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO 'V' CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' FEET ABOVE THE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGING BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6' FEET ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 2. EXISTING BLVD TREES TO BE FENCED OFF AND PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION 3. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE WARRANTIED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER OWNER/ARCHITECT'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO THE ARCHITECT'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 4. NO PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA 5. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL FOR ALL TURF AND SEEDED AREAS. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF 1/3 TOPSOIL, 1/3 SAND, AND 1/3 COMPOST IN ALL SHRUB AND PERENNIAL BEDS. 6. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE STAKED AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND/OR AS DIRECTED IN THE FIELD BY THE ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE ALL STAKING LOCATIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING. 7. ALL PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS. 8. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES FROM THE GROUND TO THE FIRST BRANCH. WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE QUALITY, HEAVY WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO DECEMBER 1ST AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER MAY 1ST. 9. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED (COMMON OR LATIN NOMENCLATURE) WITH A PLASTIC TAG WHICH SHALL NOT BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL. 10. APPLY PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR APPROVED EQ) IN ALL PLANTING BEDS FOLLOWED BY 3" OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TOPPING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 11. ALL SEEDED AREAS AND PLANTINGS WITHIN THE PROJECT SCOPE MUST BE IRRIGATED OR WATERED VIA TEMPORARY HOSE BIBS THROUGH THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD. TURF/SOD NOTES 1. SOD ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND GRADING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 2. WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB ETC. 3. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DRAINAGE SWALES, SOD SHALL BE STAKED SECURELY. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER SOD THOROUGHLY IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION. THEN WATER SOD DAILY FOR THE FIRST 30 DAYS FOLLOWING INTALLATION. IRRIGATION NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN SPECIFICATIONS AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR INSTALLATION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT SODDED/SEED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. 2. SHRUBS AND PERENNIAL BEDS TO BE IRRIGATED WITH DRIP IRRIGATION. SOD TO BE IRRIGATED WITH SPRAY. RAIN GARDENS NOT TO BE IRRIGATED. 3. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A WATERING/LAWN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIALS GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. 4. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT SOIL CONDITIONS AND COMPACTION ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AROUND THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. UNDESIRABLE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE PROPER SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE IN ALL PLANTING AREAS. 5. COORDINATE IRRIGATION SLEEVING LOCATIONS WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 6. RAIN SENSORS TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE IRRIGATION DESIGN. 7. IRRIGATION LIMITS TO EXTEND TO STREET BACK OF CURB. IRRIGATION SHALL NOT OVER SPRAY PUBLIC SIDEWALKS OR PAVED SURFACES. L200 PLANTING DETAILS 6000 Brooklyn Blvd Tri-Plex Development STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. For Cedar Partners, LLC. June 12, 2020 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: __________________________________ Date: __06/12/2020_______ Benjamin Lucas, PE License No. 54265 06-12-20 6000 BROOKLYN PARK TRIPLEX DEVELOPMEN T: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 CONTENTS Background ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 Stormwater Management Plan ............................................................................................................................... 2 Existing Condition Calculations ............................................................................................................................... 2 Proposed Condition Calculations ............................................................................................................................ 3 Runoff Rate Control ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Volume Control ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Water Quality ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Sediment & Erosion Control ................................................................................................................................... 5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 APPENDIX A: Drainage Area Exhibits ...................................................................................................................... A APPENDIX B: HydroCAD Model Results ................................................................................................................... B APPENDIX C: MIDS Calculator Results ..................................................................................................................... C APPENDIX D: Geotechnical Evaluation Reports ...................................................................................................... D 06-12-20 6000 BROOKLYN PARK TRIPLEX DEVELOPMEN T: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2 BACKGROUND The proposed 6000 Brooklyn Boulevard Tri-Plex development project is located at the 6000 block of Brooklyn Boulevard and 61st Ave N in the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (“Site”). The project will consist of developing the four properties on the 6000 block into seven Tri-Plex buildings parking, sidewalks, utilities, stormwater treatment systems and landscaping. The Site is in the City of Brooklyn Center (“City) and also within the boundaries of the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission (“SCWMC”) and is subject to its stormwater regulations. The SCWMC is the Local Governing Unit (LGU) for stormwater permitting. The stormwater management for this site has been designed to comply with the stormwater management rule and the MPCA’s current NPDES/SDS Construction Stormwater General Permit. Rate Control: Runoff rates for the proposed activity shall not exceed existing runoff rates for Atlas 14 2-, 10- and 100-yr critical storm events (SCWMC Rule 3.b). Volume Control: The first one inch of rainfall from the site’s impervious surface shall be abstracted from the site and completely drawn down within 48 hours (MPCA 15.4 & SCWMC Rule 3.h.2) . Water Quality: The SCWMC Rule 3.g requires that permanent stormwater treatment systems must remove at least 85% of total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% of phosphorus (TP) shall be removed to the maximum extent possible before discharging runoff from the Site. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN The following document is intended to explain the existing and proposed stormwater management within the construction limits of the site project located at the intersection of 61st Ave N and Brooklyn Boulevard in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. The construction limits account for 1.65 acres of the site, encompassing the planned limits for constructing the new building and utilities. See Appendix A for the Drainage Maps with construction limits. Existing Site conditions show that there is no stormwater management on-site. The existing topography of the Site consists of an approximate vertical change of up to 2 feet from the west property line to the east property line (Brooklyn Boulevard). There is currently no development on the 4 properties within the construction limits and no installed stormwater management. Proposed impervious coverage will include the seven Tri-Plex buildings, on-site parking, drive lanes, and concrete pathways. Proposed BMPs include an oversized perforated storage pipes, infiltration basins and vegetated filter strips that provide stormwater storage and rate control and treatment. We analyzed the existing and preliminary proposed Site hydrology using HydroCAD. To estimate existing and proposed runoff rates, runoff volume, and water quality, we performed hydrology modeling for the existing and proposed Site. We divided the Site into drainage boundaries, input land use, soils information, surface storage, and precipitation depths corresponding to the required design storms. EXISTING CONDITION CALCULATIONS The existing Site is undeveloped and does not include any impervious coverage within the Construction Limits. There are no existing stormwater BMPs within the construction limits, the runoff surface drains to the west lot line and eastern bordering public street where it enters the City storm sewer through catch basin inlets. The underlying soils on this Site are assumed to be loam sand type soils across the site. These soils are typically classified as Type A soils with and estimated infiltration rate of 0.80 inches/hour according to the Web Soil Survey online resource. Refer to the soils map from Web Soil Survey in Appendix D for more information, a full 06-12-20 6000 BROOKLYN PARK TRIPLEX DEVELOPMEN T: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 3 geotechnical exploration of the Site will be completed after this report and plan set have been submitted to the City for Preliminary PUD review. An existing drainage area exhibit is included in Appendix A for reference. PROPOSED CONDITION CALCULATIONS The proposed Tri-Plex development will add approximately 37,462 square feet of new impervious surfaces to the Site. The proposed stormwater management design utilizes a treatment train approach, combining three different BMP’s to treat the runoff before leaving the site. Runoff that drains to the front yards will surface drain across 10’ wide vegetated filter strips that are 1.5’ deep with an 80/20 sand section mix. After the filter strips, the runoff will be collected by catch basin inlets and routed to Infiltration Basin A, which is a smaller basin with 3:1 side slopes that will allow some of the required water quality volume to be infiltrated. Once the runoff volume reaches the basin’s overflow, the water will be collected in a run of oversized perforated N-12 storm pipes that will also promote infiltration until the overflow depth is reached. The final BMP is another infiltration basin constructed with Versa-Lok retaining walls to provide enough volume to slow down the largest storm events. The stormwater runoff from the Tri-Plex unit’s backyard will filter through a 5’ wide vegetated filter strip before flowing into the storm sewer inlets along Brooklyn Boulevard. The infiltration basins and oversized perforated pipes have been designed with enough storage to account for the design rain events and the SCWMC volume control requirement. Storm sewer pipes have been designed to collect surface runoff from the parking lot surface, concrete sidewalks and landscaped areas and routed to the BMPs. The vegetated filter strips will provide some pretreatment before the stormwater runoff is collected in an adjacent catch basin inlet. The storm sewer has been sized to handle the 10-YR design storm, with a minimum pipe size of 12”, and minimum pipe velocity of 3 feet per second and a minimum slope of 0.3%. Existing drainage patterns in the ROW around the proposed building will be maintained when tying the proposed grades back into the existing ground elevations, see Proposed Drainage Areas Exhibit in Appendix A. RUNOFF RATE CONTROL To provide enough peak flow retention for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year events, a series of infiltration basins and oversized storage pipes have been proposed. By capturing and retaining stormwater runoff from the proposed parking spaces and drive aisle & sidewalk areas, the peak off-site discharge is attenuated below the existing runoff rates as required by the City and SCWMC. Table 1 shows the shows the total peak rates within the Site. Please note, the preliminary design does not meet rate control requirements by 0.10 cfs, this will be revised and corrected as design progresses. Table 1 Total Peak Runoff Rates 1 See Appendix B HydroCAD report: Existing. 2 See Appendix B HydroCAD report: Proposed. VOLUME CONTROL The proposed infiltration basins and oversized perforated storage pipes for this project are designed with the to collectively meet the required water quality storage volume. The outlet control structures will retain the required Rainfall Event (24 hour-Atlas 14) Existing Runoff Rate (cfs)1 Proposed Runoff Rate (cfs)2 2-yr 0.00 0.00 10-yr 0.01 0.00 100-yr 0.98 1.08 06-12-20 6000 BROOKLYN PARK TRIPLEX DEVELOPMEN T: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 4 water quality volume will control the discharge rate through an orifice or a weir wall overflow. The water quality volume is assumed to be an instantaneous volume between the bottom elevation of the BMP and the invert of the controlling outlet. See the calculations below for the volume retention for the Site’s BMPs: . ! "#,"% . ! ", " The design volumes of the proposed BMP’s are as follows: Infiltration Basin A: Bottom of Basin 857.70 feet Top of Basin 860.70 feet 27” Grate 859.70 feet WQV (Volume between grate and bottom) 1,281 cubic feet 100-yr Peak Elevation 859.94 feet Lowest Opening Elevation 860.79 feet Infiltration Basin B: Bottom of Basin 855.50 feet Top of Basin 861.50 feet 27” Grate 860.00 feet 6” Orifice 858.70 feet WQV (Volume between orifice and bottom) 4,541 cubic feet Weir Wall Elevation 860.00 feet 100-yr Peak Elevation 859.45 feet Lowest Opening Elevation 860.79 feet Oversized Storage Pipe: Bottom of Sand Section 854.50 feet Bottom of Pipe 855.00 feet Top of Pipe 858.50 feet Top of Sand Section 859.00 feet Weir Wall Elevation 857.70 feet WQV (Volume between weir wall and bottom) 2,091 cubic feet 100-yr Peak Elevation 859.03 feet Lowest Opening Elevation 860.79 feet Front Yard Filter Strips: Typical Bottom of Sand Filter 858.50 feet Typical Top of Sand Filter 860.00 feet Total WQV (Volume of 4 sand filters) 1,154 cubic feet 100-yr Peak Elevation 859.19 feet Lowest Opening Elevation 860.79 feet Back Yard Filter Strips: Typical Bottom of Sand Filter 858.50 feet Typical Top of Sand Filter 860.00 feet Total WQV (Volume of 7 sand filters) 1,197 cubic feet 100-yr Peak Elevation 859.19 feet Lowest Opening Elevation 860.79 feet 06-12-20 6000 BROOKLYN PARK TRIPLEX DEVELOPMEN T: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 5 WATER QUALITY The MIDS calculator was used to show that the proposed stormwater BMPs meet the TSS and TP removal requirements from the MPCA & SCWMC. The first 1.0” of stormwater runoff will be routed through vegetated filter strips in the front or back yards first to provide sediment and phosphorus removal before entering the infiltration basins or oversized storage pipes, which will infiltrate the majority of the runoff from the smaller storms. The table below shows the expected removal percentages for the proposed chamber system, the stormwater quality unit, and the Site overall. The MIDS Calculator Results are provided in Appendix C for reference. Table 4 Water Quality Calculation Results SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL The final Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (“SWPPP”) and an Operations & Maintenance Agreement (“O&M”) will be prepared as part of the construction documents and updated as required in the NPDES General Construction Permit. During construction, erosion control measures such as silt fence, erosion control blankets, inlet protection, dust control, rock construction entrance and concrete washout areas will be implemented per the SWPPP. Permanent BMPs such as the storage pipes, infiltration basins, vegetated filter strips, and established turf cover & swales will be properly constructed per the SWPPP and maintained as agreed upon in the O&M. CONCLUSION The proposed stormwater management plan for the Tri-Plex development project for the 6000 Brooklyn Boulevard properties will implement stormwater best management practices, providing adequate retention and treatment for the site to meet the City of Brooklyn Center and Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission requirements for rate control, volume control and water quality standards. The proposed stormwater management plan for the Site consists of the following stormwater BMPs: oversize storage pipes, infiltration basins, vegetated filter strips, and natural landscaping. The Site was modeled using HydroCAD for the existing and proposed 2-, 10-, and 100-year storm events to confirm that the project meets the stormwater rate requirements for the City of Brooklyn Center and Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission. Our findings indicate the Site will successfully achieve the goals for peak runoff rate, volume control and water quality. BMP Name Annual TSS Removed (%) Annual TP Removed (%) Infiltration Basin A 96 96 Infiltration Basin B 100 100 Oversized Perf. Storage Pipes 100 100 Front Yard Filter Strips 100 100 Back Yard Filter Strips 100 100 Overall Site 100 100 06-12-20 6000 BROOKLYN PARK TRIPLEX DEVELOPMEN T: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN A APPENDIX A: DRAINAGE AREA EXHIBITS SD SD SDSD S D S D S D S D S D WWW WWW W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W S A N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N S A N S A N SAN S A N 2X 1X 3X 4X CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C: \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ D R N - B A S E . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1: 2 P L O T D A T E : 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 0 9 : 0 7 A M ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE SBI N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) 1 OF 2 DRAINAGE MAP - EXISTING CONDITIONS SUBCATCHMENT LEGEND X POND X DRAINAGE BOUNDARY FLOW DIRECTION Tc LENGTH 06/12/2020 BJL BJL 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 200504 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H CO // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // CO CO CO CO CO 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 86 0 859 861 8 6 1 86 1 8 6 1 861 8 6 1 8 6 1 86 1 8 6 1 8 6 1 861 861 8 6 1 86 1 86 0 85 7 85 8 85 9 SD SD SDSD S D S D S D S D S D WWW WWW W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W S A N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N S A N S A N SAN S A N 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 1P 3P 2P 4P 5P CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C: \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 4 - 6 0 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 8 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ D R N - B A S E . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1: 2 P L O T D A T E : 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 2 0 9 : 0 7 A M ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE SBI N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) 2 OF 2 DRAINAGE MAP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS SUBCATCHMENT LEGEND X POND X DRAINAGE BOUNDARY FLOW DIRECTION Tc LENGTH BJL BJL 06/12/2020 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 200504 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H 06-12-20 6000 BROOKLYN PARK TRIPLEX DEVELOPMEN T: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN B APPENDIX B: HYDROCAD MODEL RESULTS 1X TO NW 2X TO BROOKLYN BLVD 3X TO WEST 4X TO SW 5L EXISTING Routing Diagram for 6000 Brooklyn Blvd Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc., Printed 6/11/2020 HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv 6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 2HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (selected nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 1.555 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A (1X, 2X, 3X, 4X) 1.555 39 TOTAL AREA 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv 6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 3HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Soil Listing (selected nodes) Area (acres) Soil Group Subcatchment Numbers 1.555 HSG A 1X, 2X, 3X, 4X 0.000 HSG B 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 1.555 TOTAL AREA 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv 6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 4HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Ground Covers (selected nodes) HSG-A (acres) HSG-B (acres) HSG-C (acres) HSG-D (acres) Other (acres) Total (acres) Ground Cover Subcatchment Numbers 1.555 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.555 >75% Grass cover, Good 1X, 2X, 3X, 4X 1.555 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.555 TOTAL AREA 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 5HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1X: TO NW [45] Hint: Runoff=Zero Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 5,981 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 5,981 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1X: TO NW Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=5,981 sf Runoff Volume=0.000 af Runoff Depth=0.00" Tc=10.0 min CN=39 0.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 6HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2X: TO BROOKLYN BLVD [45] Hint: Runoff=Zero Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 21,718 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 21,718 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2X: TO BROOKLYN BLVD Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=21,718 sf Runoff Volume=0.000 af Runoff Depth=0.00" Tc=10.0 min CN=39 0.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 7HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 3X: TO WEST [45] Hint: Runoff=Zero Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 16,182 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 16,182 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 3X: TO WEST Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=16,182 sf Runoff Volume=0.000 af Runoff Depth=0.00" Tc=10.0 min CN=39 0.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 8HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 4X: TO SW [45] Hint: Runoff=Zero Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 23,840 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 23,840 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 4X: TO SW Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=23,840 sf Runoff Volume=0.000 af Runoff Depth=0.00" Tc=10.0 min CN=39 0.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 9HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 5L: EXISTING Inflow Area = 1.555 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.00" for 2-yr event Inflow = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 5L: EXISTING Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 Inflow Area=1.555 ac 0.00 cfs 0.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 10HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1X: TO NW Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.56 hrs, Volume= 0.001 af, Depth= 0.08" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 5,981 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 5,981 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1X: TO NW Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=5,981 sf Runoff Volume=0.001 af Runoff Depth=0.08" Tc=10.0 min CN=39 0.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 11HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2X: TO BROOKLYN BLVD Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.56 hrs, Volume= 0.003 af, Depth= 0.08" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 21,718 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 21,718 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2X: TO BROOKLYN BLVD Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=21,718 sf Runoff Volume=0.003 af Runoff Depth=0.08" Tc=10.0 min CN=39 0.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 12HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 3X: TO WEST Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.56 hrs, Volume= 0.002 af, Depth= 0.08" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 16,182 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 16,182 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 3X: TO WEST Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=16,182 sf Runoff Volume=0.002 af Runoff Depth=0.08" Tc=10.0 min CN=39 0.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 13HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 4X: TO SW Runoff = 0.01 cfs @ 13.56 hrs, Volume= 0.004 af, Depth= 0.08" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 23,840 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 23,840 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 4X: TO SW Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=23,840 sf Runoff Volume=0.004 af Runoff Depth=0.08" Tc=10.0 min CN=39 0.01 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 14HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 5L: EXISTING Inflow Area = 1.555 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.08" for 10-yr event Inflow = 0.01 cfs @ 13.56 hrs, Volume= 0.010 af Primary = 0.01 cfs @ 13.56 hrs, Volume= 0.010 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 5L: EXISTING Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.01 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001 0 Inflow Area=1.555 ac 0.01 cfs 0.01 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 15HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1X: TO NW Runoff = 0.09 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.011 af, Depth= 0.94" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Area (sf) CN Description 5,981 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 5,981 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1X: TO NW Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.095 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Runoff Area=5,981 sf Runoff Volume=0.011 af Runoff Depth=0.94" Tc=10.0 min CN=39 0.09 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 16HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2X: TO BROOKLYN BLVD Runoff = 0.31 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.039 af, Depth= 0.94" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Area (sf) CN Description 21,718 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 21,718 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2X: TO BROOKLYN BLVD Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Runoff Area=21,718 sf Runoff Volume=0.039 af Runoff Depth=0.94" Tc=10.0 min CN=39 0.31 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 17HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 3X: TO WEST Runoff = 0.23 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.029 af, Depth= 0.94" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Area (sf) CN Description 16,182 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 16,182 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 3X: TO WEST Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.2 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Runoff Area=16,182 sf Runoff Volume=0.029 af Runoff Depth=0.94" Tc=10.0 min CN=39 0.23 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 18HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 4X: TO SW Runoff = 0.34 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.043 af, Depth= 0.94" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Area (sf) CN Description 23,840 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 23,840 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 4X: TO SW Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Runoff Area=23,840 sf Runoff Volume=0.043 af Runoff Depth=0.94" Tc=10.0 min CN=39 0.34 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Existing 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn Blv MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/11/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 19HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 5L: EXISTING Inflow Area = 1.555 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.94" for 100-yr event Inflow = 0.98 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.122 af Primary = 0.98 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.122 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 5L: EXISTING Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 Inflow Area=1.555 ac 0.98 cfs 0.98 cfs 1S TO N BASIN 2S NW DRIVE LANE 3S NORTH FRONT LAWNS 4S REAR LAWNS TO BROOKLYN BLVD 5S S FRONT LAWNS AND DRIVE LANE 1P INF BASIN A 2P INF BASIN B 3P STORAGE PIPE 4P FILTER STRIP 5P FILTER STRIP 7L PROPOSED Routing Diagram for 6000 Brooklyn Blvd Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc., Printed 6/12/2020 HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B 6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 21HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (selected nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 0.697 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A (1S, 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S) 0.857 98 Paved parking, HSG A (1S, 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S) 1.555 72 TOTAL AREA 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B 6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 22HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Soil Listing (selected nodes) Area (acres) Soil Group Subcatchment Numbers 1.555 HSG A 1S, 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S 0.000 HSG B 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 1.555 TOTAL AREA 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B 6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 23HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Ground Covers (selected nodes) HSG-A (acres) HSG-B (acres) HSG-C (acres) HSG-D (acres) Other (acres) Total (acres) Ground Cover Subcatchment Numbers 0.697 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.697 >75% Grass cover, Good 1S, 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S 0.857 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.857 Paved parking 1S, 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S 1.555 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.555 TOTAL AREA 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B 6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 24HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pipe Listing (selected nodes) Line# Node Number In-Invert (feet) Out-Invert (feet) Length (feet) Slope (ft/ft) n Diam/Width (inches) Height (inches) Inside-Fill (inches) 1 1P 855.00 855.00 10.0 0.0000 0.011 12.0 0.0 0.0 2 2P 855.81 855.39 23.6 0.0178 0.011 12.0 0.0 0.0 3 3P 857.25 857.00 62.0 0.0040 0.011 12.0 0.0 0.0 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 25HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: TO N BASIN Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 23.99 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 180 98 Paved parking, HSG A 3,210 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 3,390 42 Weighted Average 3,210 94.69% Pervious Area 180 5.31% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: TO N BASIN Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=3,390 sf Runoff Volume=0.000 af Runoff Depth=0.00" Tc=10.0 min CN=42 0.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 26HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW DRIVE LANE Runoff = 0.74 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.047 af, Depth= 2.22" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 10,316 98 Paved parking, HSG A 837 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 11,153 94 Weighted Average 837 7.50% Pervious Area 10,316 92.50% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2S: NW DRIVE LANE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=11,153 sf Runoff Volume=0.047 af Runoff Depth=2.22" Tc=10.0 min CN=94 0.74 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 27HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NORTH FRONT LAWNS Runoff = 0.08 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.009 af, Depth= 0.38" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 5,288 98 Paved parking, HSG A 7,466 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 12,754 63 Weighted Average 7,466 58.54% Pervious Area 5,288 41.46% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 3S: NORTH FRONT LAWNS Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=12,754 sf Runoff Volume=0.009 af Runoff Depth=0.38" Tc=10.0 min CN=63 0.08 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 28HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 4S: REAR LAWNS TO BROOKLYN BLVD Runoff = 0.15 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.016 af, Depth= 0.41" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 8,892 98 Paved parking, HSG A 11,755 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 20,647 64 Weighted Average 11,755 56.93% Pervious Area 8,892 43.07% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 4S: REAR LAWNS TO BROOKLYN BLVD Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=20,647 sf Runoff Volume=0.016 af Runoff Depth=0.41" Tc=10.0 min CN=64 0.15 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 29HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 5S: S FRONT LAWNS AND DRIVE LANE Runoff = 0.55 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.037 af, Depth= 0.98" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 12,674 98 Paved parking, HSG A 7,103 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 19,777 77 Weighted Average 7,103 35.92% Pervious Area 12,674 64.08% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 5S: S FRONT LAWNS AND DRIVE LANE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=19,777 sf Runoff Volume=0.037 af Runoff Depth=0.98" Tc=10.0 min CN=77 0.55 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 30HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: INF BASIN A Inflow Area = 0.454 ac, 64.08% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.98" for 2-yr event Inflow = 0.55 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.037 af Outflow = 0.02 cfs @ 16.61 hrs, Volume= 0.037 af, Atten= 97%, Lag= 270.1 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 16.61 hrs, Volume= 0.037 af Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 859.44' @ 16.61 hrs Surf.Area= 922 sf Storage= 1,026 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 757.8 min calculated for 0.037 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 757.5 min ( 1,612.0 - 854.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 857.70' 2,312 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 857.70 303 0 0 858.70 614 459 459 859.70 1,031 823 1,281 860.70 1,031 1,031 2,312 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 855.00'12.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 855.00' / 855.00' S= 0.0000 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 859.70'27.0" Horiz. Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 860.00'5.0' long x 5.0' breadth EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #4 Discarded 857.70'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 16.61 hrs HW=859.44' (Free Discharge) 4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=857.70' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Passes 0.00 cfs of 5.61 cfs potential flow) 2=Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=857.70' (Free Discharge) 3=EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 31HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: INF BASIN A Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Inflow Area=0.454 ac Peak Elev=859.44' Storage=1,026 cf 0.55 cfs 0.02 cfs 0.02 cfs 0.00 cfs 0.00 cfs Pond 1P: INF BASIN A Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 2,2002,0001,8001,6001,4001,2001,0008006004002000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 1,0009008007006005004003002001000 El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) 860 859 858 Custom Stage Data 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 32HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 2P: INF BASIN B Inflow Area = 1.081 ac, 60.45% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.00" for 2-yr event Inflow = 0.00 cfs @ 23.99 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Outflow = 0.00 cfs @ 24.09 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af, Atten= 20%, Lag= 6.0 min Discarded = 0.00 cfs @ 24.09 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 855.50' @ 24.09 hrs Surf.Area= 1,419 sf Storage= 0 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 53.8 min calculated for 0.000 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 54.0 min ( 1,428.6 - 1,374.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 855.50' 8,514 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 855.50 1,419 0 0 858.50 1,419 4,257 4,257 859.50 1,419 1,419 5,676 860.50 1,419 1,419 7,095 861.50 1,419 1,419 8,514 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 855.81'12.0" Round Culvert L= 23.6' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 855.81' / 855.39' S= 0.0178 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 858.70'6.0" Vert. Orifice C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 860.00'4.0' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) #4 Device 1 860.00'27.0" Horiz. Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #5 Secondary 860.50'2.0' long x 5.0' breadth EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #6 Discarded 855.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 33HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Discarded OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 24.09 hrs HW=855.50' (Free Discharge) 6=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.03 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=855.50' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 2=Orifice ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 3=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 4=Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=855.50' (Free Discharge) 5=EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pond 2P: INF BASIN B Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Inflow Area=1.081 ac Peak Elev=855.50' Storage=0 cf 0.00 cfs 0.00 cfs 0.00 cfs 0.00 cfs 0.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 34HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: INF BASIN B Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 8,5008,0007,5007,0006,5006,0005,5005,0004,5004,0003,5003,0002,5002,0001,5001,0005000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 1,4001,3001,2001,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) 861 860 859 858 857 856 Custom Stage Data 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 35HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 3P: STORAGE PIPE [79] Warning: Submerged Pond 1P Primary device # 1 by 1.55' Inflow Area = 1.003 ac, 64.73% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.57" for 2-yr event Inflow = 0.74 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.047 af Outflow = 0.02 cfs @ 10.90 hrs, Volume= 0.047 af, Atten= 97%, Lag= 0.0 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 10.90 hrs, Volume= 0.047 af Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 856.55' @ 14.71 hrs Surf.Area= 0.027 ac Storage= 0.028 af Plug-Flow detention time= 525.2 min calculated for 0.047 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 525.1 min ( 1,317.0 - 792.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 854.50' 0.035 af 6.50'W x 183.00'L x 4.50'H Field A 0.123 af Overall - 0.037 af Embedded = 0.086 af x 40.0% Voids #2A 855.00' 0.029 af ADS N-12 36" x 9 Inside #1 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf 0.064 af Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 857.25'12.0" Round Culvert L= 62.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 857.25' / 857.00' S= 0.0040 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 857.70'4.0' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) #3 Discarded 854.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 10.90 hrs HW=854.55' (Free Discharge) 3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=854.50' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 2=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 36HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 3P: STORAGE PIPE - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf 9 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long = 180.00' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 183.00' Base Length 1 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 18.0" Side Stone x 2 = 6.50' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 9 Chambers x 142.0 cf = 1,278.0 cf Chamber Storage 9 Chambers x 177.2 cf = 1,595.0 cf Displacement 5,352.7 cf Field - 1,595.0 cf Chambers = 3,757.8 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,503.1 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 2,781.1 cf = 0.064 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 52.0% Overall System Size = 183.00' x 6.50' x 4.50' 9 Chambers 198.2 cy Field 139.2 cy Stone 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 37HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 3P: STORAGE PIPE Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Inflow Area=1.003 ac Peak Elev=856.55' Storage=0.028 af 0.74 cfs 0.02 cfs 0.02 cfs 0.00 cfs Pond 3P: STORAGE PIPE Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (acre-feet) 0.060.0550.050.0450.040.0350.030.0250.020.0150.010.0050 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (acres) 0.0260.0240.0220.020.0180.0160.0140.0120.010.0080.0060.0040.0020 El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) 858 857 856 855 Field A ADS N-12 36" 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 38HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 4P: FILTER STRIP Inflow Area = 0.293 ac, 41.46% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.38" for 2-yr event Inflow = 0.08 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.009 af Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.009 af, Atten= 59%, Lag= 0.0 min Discarded = 0.03 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.009 af Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 858.60' @ 12.67 hrs Surf.Area= 1,803 sf Storage= 69 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 13.5 min calculated for 0.009 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 13.5 min ( 924.9 - 911.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 858.50' 1,154 cf SAND FILTER STRIP (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 2,885 cf Overall x 40.0% Voids Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 858.50 1,803 0 0 860.00 1,803 2,705 2,705 860.10 1,803 180 2,885 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 860.00'5.0' long x 180.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 #2 Discarded 858.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 12.15 hrs HW=858.53' (Free Discharge) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.03 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=858.50' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 39HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 4P: FILTER STRIP Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 Inflow Area=0.293 ac Peak Elev=858.60' Storage=69 cf 0.08 cfs 0.03 cfs 0.03 cfs 0.00 cfs Pond 4P: FILTER STRIP Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 1,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 1,8001,7001,6001,5001,4001,3001,2001,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) 860 859 SAND FILTER STRIP 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 40HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 5P: FILTER STRIP Inflow Area = 0.474 ac, 43.07% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.41" for 2-yr event Inflow = 0.15 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.016 af Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.016 af, Atten= 77%, Lag= 0.0 min Discarded = 0.03 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.016 af Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 858.75' @ 12.86 hrs Surf.Area= 1,870 sf Storage= 188 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 39.6 min calculated for 0.016 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 39.6 min ( 945.4 - 905.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 858.50' 1,197 cf SAND FILTER STRIP (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 2,992 cf Overall x 40.0% Voids Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 858.50 1,870 0 0 860.00 1,870 2,805 2,805 860.10 1,870 187 2,992 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 860.00'5.0' long x 180.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 #2 Discarded 858.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 12.10 hrs HW=858.53' (Free Discharge) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.03 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=858.50' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 41HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 5P: FILTER STRIP Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 Inflow Area=0.474 ac Peak Elev=858.75' Storage=188 cf 0.15 cfs 0.03 cfs 0.03 cfs 0.00 cfs Pond 5P: FILTER STRIP Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 1,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 1,8001,7001,6001,5001,4001,3001,2001,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) 860 859 SAND FILTER STRIP 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 42HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 7L: PROPOSED Inflow Area = 1.555 ac, 55.15% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.00" for 2-yr event Inflow = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 7L: PROPOSED Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 Inflow Area=1.555 ac 0.00 cfs 0.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 43HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: TO N BASIN Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 12.56 hrs, Volume= 0.001 af, Depth= 0.15" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 180 98 Paved parking, HSG A 3,210 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 3,390 42 Weighted Average 3,210 94.69% Pervious Area 180 5.31% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: TO N BASIN Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=3,390 sf Runoff Volume=0.001 af Runoff Depth=0.15" Tc=10.0 min CN=42 0.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 44HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW DRIVE LANE Runoff = 1.18 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.077 af, Depth= 3.61" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 10,316 98 Paved parking, HSG A 837 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 11,153 94 Weighted Average 837 7.50% Pervious Area 10,316 92.50% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2S: NW DRIVE LANE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=11,153 sf Runoff Volume=0.077 af Runoff Depth=3.61" Tc=10.0 min CN=94 1.18 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 45HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NORTH FRONT LAWNS Runoff = 0.36 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.026 af, Depth= 1.08" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 5,288 98 Paved parking, HSG A 7,466 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 12,754 63 Weighted Average 7,466 58.54% Pervious Area 5,288 41.46% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 3S: NORTH FRONT LAWNS Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.4 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=12,754 sf Runoff Volume=0.026 af Runoff Depth=1.08" Tc=10.0 min CN=63 0.36 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 46HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 4S: REAR LAWNS TO BROOKLYN BLVD Runoff = 0.63 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.045 af, Depth= 1.14" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 8,892 98 Paved parking, HSG A 11,755 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 20,647 64 Weighted Average 11,755 56.93% Pervious Area 8,892 43.07% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 4S: REAR LAWNS TO BROOKLYN BLVD Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=20,647 sf Runoff Volume=0.045 af Runoff Depth=1.14" Tc=10.0 min CN=64 0.63 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 47HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 5S: S FRONT LAWNS AND DRIVE LANE Runoff = 1.22 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.077 af, Depth= 2.04" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 12,674 98 Paved parking, HSG A 7,103 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 19,777 77 Weighted Average 7,103 35.92% Pervious Area 12,674 64.08% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 5S: S FRONT LAWNS AND DRIVE LANE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=19,777 sf Runoff Volume=0.077 af Runoff Depth=2.04" Tc=10.0 min CN=77 1.22 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 48HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: INF BASIN A Inflow Area = 0.454 ac, 64.08% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.04" for 10-yr event Inflow = 1.22 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.077 af Outflow = 0.57 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 0.077 af, Atten= 53%, Lag= 15.0 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 0.049 af Primary = 0.55 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 0.029 af Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 859.78' @ 12.35 hrs Surf.Area= 1,031 sf Storage= 1,366 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 543.6 min calculated for 0.077 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 544.5 min ( 1,376.0 - 831.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 857.70' 2,312 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 857.70 303 0 0 858.70 614 459 459 859.70 1,031 823 1,281 860.70 1,031 1,031 2,312 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 855.00'12.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 855.00' / 855.00' S= 0.0000 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 859.70'27.0" Horiz. Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 860.00'5.0' long x 5.0' breadth EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #4 Discarded 857.70'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.25 hrs HW=859.71' (Free Discharge) 4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.54 cfs @ 12.35 hrs HW=859.78' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Passes 0.54 cfs of 7.83 cfs potential flow) 2=Grate (Weir Controls 0.54 cfs @ 0.94 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=857.70' (Free Discharge) 3=EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 49HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: INF BASIN A Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 Inflow Area=0.454 ac Peak Elev=859.78' Storage=1,366 cf 1.22 cfs 0.57 cfs 0.02 cfs 0.55 cfs 0.00 cfs Pond 1P: INF BASIN A Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 2,2002,0001,8001,6001,4001,2001,0008006004002000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 1,0009008007006005004003002001000 El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) 860 859 858 Custom Stage Data 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 50HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 2P: INF BASIN B Inflow Area = 1.081 ac, 60.45% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.35" for 10-yr event Inflow = 0.65 cfs @ 12.57 hrs, Volume= 0.032 af Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 12.55 hrs, Volume= 0.032 af, Atten= 96%, Lag= 0.0 min Discarded = 0.03 cfs @ 12.55 hrs, Volume= 0.032 af Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 856.19' @ 15.48 hrs Surf.Area= 1,419 sf Storage= 976 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 376.7 min calculated for 0.032 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 376.6 min ( 1,190.8 - 814.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 855.50' 8,514 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 855.50 1,419 0 0 858.50 1,419 4,257 4,257 859.50 1,419 1,419 5,676 860.50 1,419 1,419 7,095 861.50 1,419 1,419 8,514 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 855.81'12.0" Round Culvert L= 23.6' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 855.81' / 855.39' S= 0.0178 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 858.70'6.0" Vert. Orifice C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 860.00'4.0' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) #4 Device 1 860.00'27.0" Horiz. Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #5 Secondary 860.50'2.0' long x 5.0' breadth EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #6 Discarded 855.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 51HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Discarded OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 12.55 hrs HW=855.59' (Free Discharge) 6=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.03 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=855.50' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 2=Orifice ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 3=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 4=Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=855.50' (Free Discharge) 5=EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pond 2P: INF BASIN B Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Inflow Area=1.081 ac Peak Elev=856.19' Storage=976 cf 0.65 cfs 0.03 cfs 0.03 cfs 0.00 cfs 0.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 52HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: INF BASIN B Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 8,5008,0007,5007,0006,5006,0005,5005,0004,5004,0003,5003,0002,5002,0001,5001,0005000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 1,4001,3001,2001,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) 861 860 859 858 857 856 Custom Stage Data 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 53HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 3P: STORAGE PIPE [79] Warning: Submerged Pond 1P Primary device # 1 by 2.83' Inflow Area = 1.003 ac, 64.73% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.26" for 10-yr event Inflow = 1.18 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.106 af Outflow = 0.67 cfs @ 12.57 hrs, Volume= 0.106 af, Atten= 44%, Lag= 28.6 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 9.75 hrs, Volume= 0.075 af Primary = 0.65 cfs @ 12.57 hrs, Volume= 0.031 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 857.84' @ 12.57 hrs Surf.Area= 0.027 ac Storage= 0.051 af Plug-Flow detention time= 634.6 min calculated for 0.106 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 635.7 min ( 1,420.7 - 785.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 854.50' 0.035 af 6.50'W x 183.00'L x 4.50'H Field A 0.123 af Overall - 0.037 af Embedded = 0.086 af x 40.0% Voids #2A 855.00' 0.029 af ADS N-12 36" x 9 Inside #1 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf 0.064 af Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 857.25'12.0" Round Culvert L= 62.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 857.25' / 857.00' S= 0.0040 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 857.70'4.0' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) #3 Discarded 854.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 9.75 hrs HW=854.55' (Free Discharge) 3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.62 cfs @ 12.57 hrs HW=857.83' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Passes 0.62 cfs of 0.95 cfs potential flow) 2=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.62 cfs @ 1.18 fps) 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 54HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 3P: STORAGE PIPE - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf 9 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long = 180.00' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 183.00' Base Length 1 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 18.0" Side Stone x 2 = 6.50' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 9 Chambers x 142.0 cf = 1,278.0 cf Chamber Storage 9 Chambers x 177.2 cf = 1,595.0 cf Displacement 5,352.7 cf Field - 1,595.0 cf Chambers = 3,757.8 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,503.1 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 2,781.1 cf = 0.064 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 52.0% Overall System Size = 183.00' x 6.50' x 4.50' 9 Chambers 198.2 cy Field 139.2 cy Stone 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 55HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 3P: STORAGE PIPE Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 Inflow Area=1.003 ac Peak Elev=857.84' Storage=0.051 af 1.18 cfs 0.67 cfs 0.02 cfs 0.65 cfs Pond 3P: STORAGE PIPE Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (acre-feet) 0.060.0550.050.0450.040.0350.030.0250.020.0150.010.0050 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (acres) 0.0260.0240.0220.020.0180.0160.0140.0120.010.0080.0060.0040.0020 El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) 858 857 856 855 Field A ADS N-12 36" 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 56HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 4P: FILTER STRIP Inflow Area = 0.293 ac, 41.46% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.08" for 10-yr event Inflow = 0.36 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.026 af Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.026 af, Atten= 91%, Lag= 0.0 min Discarded = 0.03 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.026 af Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 859.19' @ 13.34 hrs Surf.Area= 1,803 sf Storage= 494 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 137.6 min calculated for 0.026 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 137.5 min ( 1,005.3 - 867.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 858.50' 1,154 cf SAND FILTER STRIP (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 2,885 cf Overall x 40.0% Voids Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 858.50 1,803 0 0 860.00 1,803 2,705 2,705 860.10 1,803 180 2,885 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 860.00'5.0' long x 180.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 #2 Discarded 858.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 11.95 hrs HW=858.52' (Free Discharge) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.03 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=858.50' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 57HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 4P: FILTER STRIP Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.4 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 Inflow Area=0.293 ac Peak Elev=859.19' Storage=494 cf 0.36 cfs 0.03 cfs 0.03 cfs 0.00 cfs Pond 4P: FILTER STRIP Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 1,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 1,8001,7001,6001,5001,4001,3001,2001,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) 860 859 SAND FILTER STRIP 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 58HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 5P: FILTER STRIP Inflow Area = 0.474 ac, 43.07% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.14" for 10-yr event Inflow = 0.63 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.045 af Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.045 af, Atten= 94%, Lag= 0.0 min Discarded = 0.03 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.045 af Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 859.85' @ 14.51 hrs Surf.Area= 1,870 sf Storage= 1,007 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 315.1 min calculated for 0.045 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 315.0 min ( 1,179.7 - 864.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 858.50' 1,197 cf SAND FILTER STRIP (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 2,992 cf Overall x 40.0% Voids Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 858.50 1,870 0 0 860.00 1,870 2,805 2,805 860.10 1,870 187 2,992 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 860.00'5.0' long x 180.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 #2 Discarded 858.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 11.90 hrs HW=858.52' (Free Discharge) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.03 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=858.50' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 59HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 5P: FILTER STRIP Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Inflow Area=0.474 ac Peak Elev=859.85' Storage=1,007 cf 0.63 cfs 0.03 cfs 0.03 cfs 0.00 cfs Pond 5P: FILTER STRIP Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 1,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 1,8001,7001,6001,5001,4001,3001,2001,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) 860 859 SAND FILTER STRIP 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 60HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 7L: PROPOSED Inflow Area = 1.555 ac, 55.15% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.00" for 10-yr event Inflow = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 7L: PROPOSED Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 Inflow Area=1.555 ac 0.00 cfs 0.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 61HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: TO N BASIN Runoff = 0.08 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.008 af, Depth= 1.20" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Area (sf) CN Description 180 98 Paved parking, HSG A 3,210 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 3,390 42 Weighted Average 3,210 94.69% Pervious Area 180 5.31% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: TO N BASIN Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Runoff Area=3,390 sf Runoff Volume=0.008 af Runoff Depth=1.20" Tc=10.0 min CN=42 0.08 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 62HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW DRIVE LANE Runoff = 2.00 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.144 af, Depth= 6.76" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Area (sf) CN Description 10,316 98 Paved parking, HSG A 837 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 11,153 94 Weighted Average 837 7.50% Pervious Area 10,316 92.50% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2S: NW DRIVE LANE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 2 1 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Runoff Area=11,153 sf Runoff Volume=0.144 af Runoff Depth=6.76" Tc=10.0 min CN=94 2.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 63HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NORTH FRONT LAWNS Runoff = 1.16 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.079 af, Depth= 3.26" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Area (sf) CN Description 5,288 98 Paved parking, HSG A 7,466 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 12,754 63 Weighted Average 7,466 58.54% Pervious Area 5,288 41.46% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 3S: NORTH FRONT LAWNS Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Runoff Area=12,754 sf Runoff Volume=0.079 af Runoff Depth=3.26" Tc=10.0 min CN=63 1.16 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 64HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 4S: REAR LAWNS TO BROOKLYN BLVD Runoff = 1.95 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.133 af, Depth= 3.36" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Area (sf) CN Description 8,892 98 Paved parking, HSG A 11,755 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 20,647 64 Weighted Average 11,755 56.93% Pervious Area 8,892 43.07% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 4S: REAR LAWNS TO BROOKLYN BLVD Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 2 1 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Runoff Area=20,647 sf Runoff Volume=0.133 af Runoff Depth=3.36" Tc=10.0 min CN=64 1.95 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 65HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 5S: S FRONT LAWNS AND DRIVE LANE Runoff = 2.71 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.181 af, Depth= 4.79" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Area (sf) CN Description 12,674 98 Paved parking, HSG A 7,103 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 19,777 77 Weighted Average 7,103 35.92% Pervious Area 12,674 64.08% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 5S: S FRONT LAWNS AND DRIVE LANE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 3 2 1 0 MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47" Runoff Area=19,777 sf Runoff Volume=0.181 af Runoff Depth=4.79" Tc=10.0 min CN=77 2.71 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 66HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: INF BASIN A Inflow Area = 0.454 ac, 64.08% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.79" for 100-yr event Inflow = 2.71 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.181 af Outflow = 2.69 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.181 af, Atten= 1%, Lag= 1.1 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.052 af Primary = 2.67 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.129 af Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 859.94' @ 12.11 hrs Surf.Area= 1,031 sf Storage= 1,525 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 245.1 min calculated for 0.181 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 246.2 min ( 1,058.3 - 812.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 857.70' 2,312 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 857.70 303 0 0 858.70 614 459 459 859.70 1,031 823 1,281 860.70 1,031 1,031 2,312 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 855.00'12.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 855.00' / 855.00' S= 0.0000 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 859.70'27.0" Horiz. Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 860.00'5.0' long x 5.0' breadth EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #4 Discarded 857.70'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.00 hrs HW=859.83' (Free Discharge) 4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=2.60 cfs @ 12.11 hrs HW=859.93' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Passes 2.60 cfs of 7.96 cfs potential flow) 2=Grate (Weir Controls 2.60 cfs @ 1.58 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=857.70' (Free Discharge) 3=EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 67HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: INF BASIN A Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=0.454 ac Peak Elev=859.94' Storage=1,525 cf 2.71 cfs 2.69 cfs 0.02 cfs 2.67 cfs 0.00 cfs Pond 1P: INF BASIN A Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 2,2002,0001,8001,6001,4001,2001,0008006004002000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 1,0009008007006005004003002001000 El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) 860 859 858 Custom Stage Data 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 68HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 2P: INF BASIN B [81] Warning: Exceeded Pond 3P by 1.64' @ 12.85 hrs Inflow Area = 1.081 ac, 60.45% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.44" for 100-yr event Inflow = 3.84 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.220 af Outflow = 0.71 cfs @ 12.79 hrs, Volume= 0.220 af, Atten= 81%, Lag= 37.5 min Discarded = 0.03 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.128 af Primary = 0.68 cfs @ 12.79 hrs, Volume= 0.092 af Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 859.47' @ 12.79 hrs Surf.Area= 1,419 sf Storage= 5,640 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 1,004.9 min calculated for 0.220 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 1,005.3 min ( 1,808.4 - 803.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 855.50' 8,514 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 855.50 1,419 0 0 858.50 1,419 4,257 4,257 859.50 1,419 1,419 5,676 860.50 1,419 1,419 7,095 861.50 1,419 1,419 8,514 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 855.81'12.0" Round Culvert L= 23.6' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 855.81' / 855.39' S= 0.0178 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 858.70'6.0" Vert. Orifice C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 860.00'4.0' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) #4 Device 1 860.00'27.0" Horiz. Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #5 Secondary 860.50'2.0' long x 5.0' breadth EOF Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #6 Discarded 855.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 69HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Discarded OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 12.10 hrs HW=855.72' (Free Discharge) 6=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.03 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.68 cfs @ 12.79 hrs HW=859.47' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Passes 0.68 cfs of 6.73 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice (Orifice Controls 0.68 cfs @ 3.48 fps) 3=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 4=Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=855.50' (Free Discharge) 5=EOF ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pond 2P: INF BASIN B Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.081 ac Peak Elev=859.47' Storage=5,640 cf 3.84 cfs 0.71 cfs 0.03 cfs 0.68 cfs 0.00 cfs 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 70HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: INF BASIN B Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 8,5008,0007,5007,0006,5006,0005,5005,0004,5004,0003,5003,0002,5002,0001,5001,0005000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 1,4001,3001,2001,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) 861 860 859 858 857 856 Custom Stage Data 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 71HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 3P: STORAGE PIPE [93] Warning: Storage range exceeded by 0.03' [79] Warning: Submerged Pond 1P Primary device # 1 by 4.00' Inflow Area = 1.003 ac, 64.73% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.58" for 100-yr event Inflow = 4.63 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.299 af Outflow = 3.79 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.297 af, Atten= 18%, Lag= 3.8 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 6.85 hrs, Volume= 0.084 af Primary = 3.77 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.212 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 859.03' @ 12.17 hrs Surf.Area= 0.027 ac Storage= 0.064 af Plug-Flow detention time= 264.0 min calculated for 0.297 af (99% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 258.6 min ( 1,043.6 - 785.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 854.50' 0.035 af 6.50'W x 183.00'L x 4.50'H Field A 0.123 af Overall - 0.037 af Embedded = 0.086 af x 40.0% Voids #2A 855.00' 0.029 af ADS N-12 36" x 9 Inside #1 Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf 0.064 af Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 857.25'12.0" Round Culvert L= 62.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 857.25' / 857.00' S= 0.0040 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 857.70'4.0' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) #3 Discarded 854.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 6.85 hrs HW=854.55' (Free Discharge) 3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=3.66 cfs @ 12.17 hrs HW=858.98' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 3.66 cfs @ 4.66 fps) 2=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir (Passes 3.66 cfs of 17.66 cfs potential flow) 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 72HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 3P: STORAGE PIPE - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS N-12 36" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 36.1"W x 36.1"H => 7.10 sf x 20.00'L = 142.0 cf Outside= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 8.86 sf x 20.00'L = 177.2 cf 9 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long = 180.00' Row Length +18.0" End Stone x 2 = 183.00' Base Length 1 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 18.0" Side Stone x 2 = 6.50' Base Width 6.0" Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 4.50' Field Height 9 Chambers x 142.0 cf = 1,278.0 cf Chamber Storage 9 Chambers x 177.2 cf = 1,595.0 cf Displacement 5,352.7 cf Field - 1,595.0 cf Chambers = 3,757.8 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,503.1 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 2,781.1 cf = 0.064 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 52.0% Overall System Size = 183.00' x 6.50' x 4.50' 9 Chambers 198.2 cy Field 139.2 cy Stone 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 73HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 3P: STORAGE PIPE Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.003 ac Peak Elev=859.03' Storage=0.064 af 4.63 cfs 3.79 cfs 0.02 cfs 3.77 cfs Pond 3P: STORAGE PIPE Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (acre-feet) 0.060.0550.050.0450.040.0350.030.0250.020.0150.010.0050 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (acres) 0.0260.0240.0220.020.0180.0160.0140.0120.010.0080.0060.0040.0020 El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) 859 858 857 856 855 Field A ADS N-12 36" 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 74HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 4P: FILTER STRIP [93] Warning: Storage range exceeded by 0.05' Inflow Area = 0.293 ac, 41.46% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.26" for 100-yr event Inflow = 1.16 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.079 af Outflow = 0.80 cfs @ 12.31 hrs, Volume= 0.079 af, Atten= 31%, Lag= 12.2 min Discarded = 0.03 cfs @ 11.55 hrs, Volume= 0.054 af Primary = 0.77 cfs @ 12.31 hrs, Volume= 0.025 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 860.15' @ 12.31 hrs Surf.Area= 1,803 sf Storage= 1,154 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 256.3 min calculated for 0.079 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 256.4 min ( 1,096.3 - 839.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 858.50' 1,154 cf SAND FILTER STRIP (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 2,885 cf Overall x 40.0% Voids Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 858.50 1,803 0 0 860.00 1,803 2,705 2,705 860.10 1,803 180 2,885 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 860.00'5.0' long x 180.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 #2 Discarded 858.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 11.55 hrs HW=858.52' (Free Discharge) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.03 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.71 cfs @ 12.31 hrs HW=860.14' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.71 cfs @ 1.01 fps) 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 75HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 4P: FILTER STRIP Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 Inflow Area=0.293 ac Peak Elev=860.15' Storage=1,154 cf 1.16 cfs 0.80 cfs 0.03 cfs 0.77 cfs Pond 4P: FILTER STRIP Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 1,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 1,8001,7001,6001,5001,4001,3001,2001,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) 860 859 SAND FILTER STRIP 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 76HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 5P: FILTER STRIP [93] Warning: Storage range exceeded by 0.09' Inflow Area = 0.474 ac, 43.07% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.36" for 100-yr event Inflow = 1.95 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.133 af Outflow = 1.11 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.112 af, Atten= 43%, Lag= 3.7 min Discarded = 0.03 cfs @ 11.25 hrs, Volume= 0.063 af Primary = 1.08 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.049 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 860.19' @ 12.17 hrs Surf.Area= 1,870 sf Storage= 1,197 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 313.3 min calculated for 0.112 af (84% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 243.8 min ( 1,081.7 - 837.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 858.50' 1,197 cf SAND FILTER STRIP (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 2,992 cf Overall x 40.0% Voids Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 858.50 1,870 0 0 860.00 1,870 2,805 2,805 860.10 1,870 187 2,992 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 860.00'5.0' long x 180.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 #2 Discarded 858.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 11.25 hrs HW=858.52' (Free Discharge) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.03 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.95 cfs @ 12.16 hrs HW=860.17' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.95 cfs @ 1.11 fps) 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 77HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 5P: FILTER STRIP Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 2 1 0 Inflow Area=0.474 ac Peak Elev=860.19' Storage=1,197 cf 1.95 cfs 1.11 cfs 0.03 cfs 1.08 cfs Pond 5P: FILTER STRIP Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 1,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 1,8001,7001,6001,5001,4001,3001,2001,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000 El e v a t i o n ( f e e t ) 860 859 SAND FILTER STRIP 6000 Brooklyn Blvd - Proposed 06/12/2020C:\Users\BLucas\Dropbox\Projects\200504 - 6000 Brooklyn B MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.47"6000 Brooklyn Blvd Printed 6/12/2020Prepared by Solution Blue, Inc. Page 78HydroCAD® 10.00-24 s/n 02082 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 7L: PROPOSED Inflow Area = 1.555 ac, 55.15% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.08" for 100-yr event Inflow = 1.08 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.141 af Primary = 1.08 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.141 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 7L: PROPOSED Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 Inflow Area=1.555 ac 1.08 cfs 1.08 cfs 06-12-20 6000 BROOKLYN PARK TRIPLEX DEVELOPMEN T: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN C APPENDIX C: MIDS CALCULATOR RESULTS Project Information Calculator Version:Version 3: January 2017 Project Name:6000 Brooklyn Blvd TriPlex Development User Name / Company Name:Solution Blue, Inc -BL Date:06/12/2020 Project Description: Construction Permit?:Yes Site Information Retention Requirement (inches):1. Site's Zip Code:55429 Annual Rainfall (inches):30.8 Phosphorus EMC (mg/l):0.3 TSS EMC (mg/l):54.5 Total Site Area Land Cover A Soils (acres) B Soils (acres) C Soils (acres) D Soils (acres) Total (acres) Forest/Open Space -Undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land 0 Managed Turf -disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed 0.697 0.697 Impervious Area (acres)0.857 Total Area (acres)1.554 Site Areas Routed to BMPs Land Cover A Soils (acres) B Soils (acres) C Soils (acres) D Soils (acres) Total (acres) Forest/Open Space -Undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land 0 Managed Turf -disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed 0.697 0.697 Impervious Area (acres)0.857 Total Area (acres)1.554 Summary Information Performance Goal Requirement Performance goal volume retention requirement:3111 ft3 Volume removed by BMPs towards performance goal:3111 ft3 Percent volume removed towards performance goal 100 % Annual Volume and Pollutant Load Reductions Post development annual runoff volume 2.1222 acre-ft Annual runoff volume removed by BMPs:2.1206 acre-ft Percent annual runoff volume removed:100 % Post development annual particulate P load:0.952 lbs Annual particulate P removed by BMPs:0.952 lbs Post development annual dissolved P load:0.779 lbs Annual dissolved P removed by BMPs:0.779 lbs Percent annual total phosphorus removed:100 % Post development annual TSS load:314.6 lbs Annual TSS removed by BMPs:314.4 lbs Percent annual TSS removed:100 % BMP Summary Performance Goal Summary BMP Name BMP Volume Capacity (ft3) Volume Recieved (ft3) Volume Retained (ft3) Volume Outflow (ft3) Percent Retained (%) Front Yard Filter Strips 2704 439 439 0 100 Back Yard Filter Strips 2805 741 741 0 100 Infiltration Basin A 1334 1056 1056 0 100 Infiltration Basin B 4541 15 15 0 100 Oversize Perf. Storage Pipes 2396 860 860 0 100 Annual Volume Summary BMP Name Volume From Direct Watershed (acre-ft) Volume From Upstream BMPs (acre-ft) Volume Retained (acre-ft) Volume outflow (acre-ft) Percent Retained (%) Front Yard Filter Strips 0.3248 0 0.3248 0 100 Back Yard Filter Strips 0.5412 0 0.5396 0.00160000000000005100 Infiltration Basin A 0.6951 0 0.6641 0.031 96 Infiltration Basin B 0.0344 0 0.0344 0 100 Oversize Perf. Storage Pipes 0.5267 0.031 0.5577 0 100 Particulate Phosphorus Summary BMP Name Load From Direct Watershed (lbs) Load From Upstream BMPs (lbs) Load Retained (lbs) Outflow Load (lbs) Percent Retained (%) Front Yard Filter Strips 0.1458 0 0.1458 0 100 Back Yard Filter Strips 0.2429 0 0.2422 0.0007 100 Infiltration Basin A 0.312 0 0.2981 0.0139 96 Infiltration Basin B 0.0154 0 0.0154 0 100 Oversize Perf. Storage Pipes 0.2364 0.0139 0.2503 0 100 Dissolved Phosphorus Summary BMP Name Load From Direct Watershed (lbs) Load From Upstream BMPs (lbs) Load Retained (lbs) Outflow Load (lbs) Percent Retained (%) Front Yard Filter Strips 0.1193 0 0.1193 0 100 Back Yard Filter Strips 0.1987 0 0.1981 0.0006 100 Infiltration Basin A 0.2552 0 0.2438 0.0114 96 Infiltration Basin B 0.0126 0 0.0126 0 100 Oversize Perf. Storage Pipes 0.1934 0.0114 0.2048 0 100 TSS Summary BMP Name Load From Direct Watershed (lbs) Load From Upstream BMPs (lbs) Load Retained (lbs) Outflow Load (lbs) Percent Retained (%) Front Yard Filter Strips 48.15 0 48.15 0 100 Back Yard Filter Strips 80.23 0 79.99 0.240000000000009 100 Infiltration Basin A 103.04 0 98.44 4.60000000000001 96 Infiltration Basin B 5.1 0 5.1 0 100 Oversize Perf. Storage Pipes 78.08 4.60000000000001 82.68 0 100 BMP Schematic 06-12-20 6000 BROOKLYN PARK TRIPLEX DEVELOPMEN T: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN D APPENDIX D: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORTS Soil Map—Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/4/2020 Page 1 of 3 49 9 0 1 5 0 49 9 0 1 7 0 49 9 0 1 9 0 49 9 0 2 1 0 49 9 0 2 3 0 49 9 0 2 5 0 49 9 0 2 7 0 49 9 0 2 9 0 49 9 0 3 1 0 49 9 0 1 5 0 49 9 0 1 7 0 49 9 0 1 9 0 49 9 0 2 1 0 49 9 0 2 3 0 49 9 0 2 5 0 49 9 0 2 7 0 49 9 0 2 9 0 49 9 0 3 1 0 474270 474290 474310 474330 474350 474370 474270 474290 474310 474330 474350 474370 45° 3' 56'' N 93 ° 1 9 ' 3 7 ' ' W 45° 3' 56'' N 93 ° 1 9 ' 3 1 ' ' W 45° 3' 51'' N 93 ° 1 9 ' 3 7 ' ' W 45° 3' 51'' N 93 ° 1 9 ' 3 1 ' ' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 0 35 70 140 210 Feet 0 10 20 40 60 Meters Map Scale: 1:805 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Hennepin County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 16, 2019 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 19, 2019—Aug 29, 2019 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map—Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/4/2020 Page 2 of 3 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI D64B Urban land-Hubbard complex, Mississippi River Valley, 0 to 8 percent slopes 1.9 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 1.9 100.0% Soil Map—Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/4/2020 Page 3 of 3 Exhibit B City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3300 | www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please take notice that the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center will hold an on-line public hearing on Thursday, August 13, 2020, at approximately 7:00 p.m. Meeting materials can be accessed by visiting the City of Brooklyn Center’s website at: https://www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org/index.aspx?NID=255. A definite time for this application to be considered cannot be given as it will depend on the progression of the agenda items. This public hearing was originally scheduled for July 9, 2020; however, the public hearing was continued to allow additional time to address necessary easements along Brooklyn Boulevard and access off Brooklyn Boulevard. TYPE OF REQUEST: Establishment of a Planned Unit Development, Site and Building Plan, and Preliminary and Final Plat Approvals PETITIONER: C Alan Homes PROPERTY OWNER: Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 PROPERTY ID: 03-118-21-12-0016, 03-118-21-12-0015, 03-118-21-12-0098, and 03-118-21-12-0087 BRIEF STATEMENT OF CONTENTS OF PETITION: Consideration of requests that would allow for four EDA- owned lots to be developed into seven triplexes and associated site improvements. As City Hall is currently closed to the public due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we strongly encourage you to forward your comments and questions to gmcintosh@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us up until noon on the day of the meeting, or contact Ginny McIntosh at (763) 569-3319. Your comments will be included in the record and addressed as part of the meeting. Alternatively, you may participate in the Planning Commission meeting via Webex at: logis.webex.com Meeting Number (Access Code): 141 666 5172 Password: BCPC08132020Mtng By Phone: 1 (312) 535-8110 (Enter Access Code) Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the City Clerk at (763) 569-3300 to make arrangements. Respectfully, Ginny McIntosh City Planner/Zoning Administrator Brooklyn Boulevard Beard Avenue North 61st Avenue North Ewing Avenue North Commodore Drive C Alan Homes Trip lex Project (600 0 Block of Brooklyn Blvd) Applicant: C Alan Homes Request: Establ ishment of a Planned Unit Development, Site and Building Plan, and Preliminary and Final Plat Approvals PROPOSED BROOKLYN BOULEVARD TRIPLEXES A series of new triplexes along Brooklyn Boulevard are being proposed for construction by C. Alan Homes (https://www.c-alanhomes.com/), a Minnesota based home design and construction company. Triplexes in each of the two locations will be arranged in a row and face the Boulevard. •Two locations totaling 39 new residential units,each proposed to have three bedrooms •Pedestrian access directly onto Brooklyn Boulevardand parking in the rear •Rents are estimated at $1850-$2200 per three-bedroom unit •20% of the units will be Section 8 eligible 6900 Brooklyn Blvd (north of Slim’s) •.98 Acres •6 buildings proposed •18 total units •Each unit approx 1295 sq ft 6000 Brooklyn Blvd (south of the Sanctuary at Brooklyn Center) •1.65 Acres •7 buildings proposed •21 total units •Each unit approx 1295 sq ft PROJECT LOCATIONS CO N T A C T Ginny McIntosh City Planner and Zoning Administrator City of Brooklyn Center 763.569.3319 gmcintosh@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us Renderings courtesy of C. Alan Homes LLC VIRTUAL PUBLIC HEARING Brooklyn Center Planning Commission Meeting Thursday, August 13th 7:00PM Visit https://www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org/ index.aspx?NID=255 July 7, 2020 C Alan Homes Attn: Terry Robertson and Curt Brekke 5215 Terraceview Ln N Plymouth, MN 55446 RE: City of Brooklyn Center, MN Planning Commission Application No. 2020-004 Request for Establishment of a Planned Unit Development, Site and Building Plan, Preliminary and Final Plat Approvals for the 6000 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard Mr. Robertson and Mr. Brekke, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Brooklyn Center is required to approve or deny a written request for certain land use actions within sixty (60) days from receipt of an application. Community Development Department records indicate the City received the above-referenced application and documentation on June 15, 2020, which means the City’s 60-day time limit would expire on August 14, 2020. By allowances granted under Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, Subd. 3(f), the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby providing official notice that the review period has been extended an additional sixty (60) days to allow the time necessary for City staff to prepare a resolution, including proposed conditions of approval, for review and action by City Council. The new deadline for completing the review and final action on this application is now October 13, 2020. As the public hearing has already been published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post for the July 9, 2020 Planning Commission meeting, the intent is to table the public hearing to provide sufficient time for you, the Applicant, to reconcile any adjustments to the site plan as relating to the additional easements necessary for Phase II of the Brooklyn Boulevard reconstruction and modernization project and determine the ability for driveway access off Brooklyn Boulevard from Hennepin County. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at (763) 569-3319 or email gmcintosh@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us. Sincerely, Ginny McIntosh City Planner and Zoning Administrator Exhibit C M E M O R A N D U M DATE: August 17, 2020 TO: Ginny McIntosh, City Planner/Zoning Administrator FROM: Andrew Hogg, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Preliminary Site Plan & Plat Review – Revised Brooklyn Boulevard 6000 Brooklyn Blvd Tri-plexes Public Works staff reviewed the following documents submitted for review for the proposed 6000 Brooklyn Blvd Tri-plexes (Planning Commission Application No. 2020-004): Preliminary Plans and plat submitted 07/24/2020 Subject to final staff Site Plan approval, the referenced plans must be revised in accordance with the following comments/revisions and approved prior to issuance of Land Alteration permit. C000 Title Sheet 1. No comments. C100 Removals Plan 2. Right of Way along Brooklyn Blvd is owned by Hennepin County. Obtain necessary permits prior to work with in Hennepin County Right of Way. 3. Protect existing bus stop sign along Brooklyn Blvd. Coordinate with Metro Transit to maintain bus service. 4. Remove the existing sidewalk from bus stop to south end of property. 5. Remove curb for proposed concrete drive to Brooklyn Blvd. 6. Remove existing service stubs to back of curb along Brooklyn Blvd. 7. Removal for utility connections in street shall extent curb to curb or to drive lane, no partial width removals. C200, 202 and 202 – SWPPP Plans 8. No comments. C210 and 211 – Erosion Control Plans 9. No comments. C300 – Site Plan 10. Need to provide parallel sidewalk along back side of new curb. 11.All utilities and storm water management facilities to be within a drainage & utility easement. 12. Remove curb bump outs or relocate to property lines. 13. Add No Right Turn sign on Brooklyn Blvd for south exit. 14. Show location of ADA stalls & access routes. 15. Only 40 stalls shown on plans (lost 2 for trash) – should provide 2.5 stalls per unit. 16. Reduce width of exit to 1 lane of traffic (12’-15’ or 20’ if part of emergency access route). 17. Eliminate southern lot (incorporate into most southern building lot). 18.Site triangles at entrance/exits of development shall be free and clear of any obstructions. Exhibit D PC Review Memo (Revised), August 17, 2020 19. Provide detailed vehicle turning and tracking movement diagrams for delivery vehicles and garbage trucks demonstrating specific and actual routes. 20. Use City Detail for City driveway aprons. 21. Developer removes the existing sidewalk and installs a 1.5" bituminous trail to ensure that their grading and elevations work. There is approximately 375’ of trail from the south property line to the bus stop pull off. The City Brooklyn Blvd Project will then install the final 1.5" bituminous lift on the trail and the pedestrian curb ramp at 61st Avenue with the road project. C400 – Grading and Drainage Plan 22. All city roadway embankment material installed within pavement patching areas of existing roadways shall be placed in lifts not to exceed 8-inches and compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of maximum density regardless of depth below the final pavement surface. The Engineer shall take a minimum of three (3) compaction tests at varying elevations within the pavement patch area. 23. Provide retaining wall elevations/grades. 24. Retaining walls over 3’ in height need to be certified by engineer and must include a safety railing/fence. 25. Verify constructability of OCS4, CBMH5 & CBMH6 with 36” pipe. 26. Verify that OCS4 to CBMH6 can be constructed without encroaching on adjacent property. 27. Storm sewer & infiltration areas to be privately owned & maintained. 28. Elevations on OCS8 are not correct/match up with detail. 29. Adjust elevations of the FES’s to match basin bottom elevations. 30. There appears to be a number of typos in the spot elevations & slopes, please review & adjust accordingly. C500 – Utility Plan 31. 8” watermain to be looped out to Brooklyn Blvd. 32. Provide separate service line to each bldg. or provide joint maintenance agreements for service lines. 33. They don’t make 2” DIP, adjust water main notes accordingly. 34. All on-site utility lines to be privately owned and maintained. 35. Verify water service sizes. 36. Provide on-site fire hydrant. 37. They don’t make a 12.5 degree watermain bend. 38. Minimum sanitary sewer service pipe size to be 4”. 39. Extend sanitary line and move Sanitary Manhole #10 overtop of existing main for connection location. 40. All improvements installed within public rights of way shall be constructed to City specifications/details. C900, 901, 902 and 903 – Details 41. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities must conform to the City standard specifications and details. The City’s standard details must be included in the plan. 42. Update to use current City plates. PC Review Memo (Revised), August 17, 2020 Preliminary Plat/Final 43. Drainage & Utility easements shall be adjusted to cover all shared/common utility lines (sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer) along with any storm water management features. 44. City & County will review permanent rights of way and easement needs along Brooklyn Blvd (Plats to be reviewed by Hennepin County Engineer). 45. Provide required separate cross access/cross parking easements. 46. Provide required separate trail & sidewalk easements. 47. Change Bloomington to Brooklyn Center in signature areas. 48. It appears that all property is Torrens, adjust Document block and signature blocks accordingly 49. Combine Outlot A with Lot 7. 50. Label & dimension proposed rights of way dedications 51. Change dedication language to include rights of way dedications 52. Need working copy of the preliminary plat to show all vacated easements, proposed easements, existing and proposed utilities and provide all easement documents for the City for review. A 10’ drainage and utility easement must be dedicated on the plat around the entire perimeter of the site. An additional utility easement must be dedicated on the plat for the private water main and sanitary to allow for maintenance access per the Developers Agreement. 53. Legal descriptions and easement vacation documents must be obtained for all existing easements. Existing public easements as determined by the City must be vacated, and proposed easements must be dedicated as part of the preliminary and final platting process. The formal vacation document must contain an easement vacation description and depiction exhibit signed by a professional surveyor. 54. An updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Planner and City Attorney for review at the time of the preliminary plat application (within 30 days of preliminary plat application). Additionally, this will need to stay current and be updated through the approval process as required to maintain and be current within 30 days of the release of final plat. 55. The applicant is responsible for coordinating site development plans with Xcel Energy, CenterPoint Energy, Qwest Communications and other private utility companies. Any further easements necessary to provide utility service to the proposed site development shall be dedicated to the public for public use with the final plat. 56. Provide right-out only at southern property line. This access must be documented in the PUD agreement for this parcel and the necessary cross access agreements will be required. This access is to be limited to right-out only with future Brooklyn Blvd reconstruction project that will include a raised center median. Miscellaneous 57. See redlines for additional site plan comments. 58. Provide landscape and irrigation plan. 59. Provide share access agreement and easement at south property line incase properties south of plan are redeveloped. PC Review Memo (Revised), August 17, 2020 60. Upon project completion, the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures; and provide certified record drawings of all project plan sheets depicting any associated private and/or public improvements, revisions and adjustments prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The as-built survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project as determined and directed by the City Engineer. 61. Inspection for the private site improvements must be performed by the developer’s design/project engineer. Upon project completion, the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer’s immediate and direct supervision.(see attached template letter) The engineer must be certified in the State of Minnesota and must certify all required as-built drawings (which are separate from the as-built survey). 62. The total disturbed area exceeds one acre; an NPDES permit is required. In addition, the total disturbed area is less than five acres. The applicant has submitted plans to the City of Brooklyn Center for project review on behalf on the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission. Provide an updated storm water plan that meets the requirements of the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission by revising the proposed 100yr storm event to below the existing run-off rate. Basin/storage must drain down in 48 hours. 63. The City has submitted the plans to Hennepin County for review. Applicant must meet requirements from Hennepin County’s review. 64. Utility Facilities Easement Agreement required. Prior to issuance of a Land Alteration 65. Final construction/demolition plans and specifications need to be received and approved by the City Engineer in form and format as determined by the City. The final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan and/or as amended by the City Engineer. 66. A letter of credit or a cash escrow in the amount of 100% of the estimated cost as determined b y City staff shall be deposited with the City. 67. During construction of the site improvements, and until the permanent turf and plantings are established, the developer will be required to reimburse the City for the administration and engineering inspection efforts. Please submit a deposit of $2,500 that the City can draw upon on a monthly basis. 68. A construction management plan and agreement is required that addresses general construction activities and management provisions, traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions, tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safet y provisions, definition of responsibilit y p rovisions, temporary parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non-compliance provisions. A separate $2,500 deposit will be required as part of the non-compliance provision. Anticipated Permitting: 69. A City of Brookl yn Center Land Disturbance Permit is required. PC Review Memo (Revised), August 17, 2020 70. Applicant to obtain required permits to work in County right-of-way. 71. A MPCA NPDES permit is required. 72. Conditions specified by the City to meet the requirements of the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission must be met. 73. Other permits not listed may be required and is the responsibility of the developer to obtain and warrant. 74. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of applicable building and land disturbance permits. 75. A preconstruction conference must be scheduled and held with City staff and other entities designated by the City. The aforementioned comments are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Other guarantees and site development conditions may be further prescribed throughout the project as warranted and determined by the City. City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3300 | www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org Community Development 763-569-3330 Direct August 4, 2020 C Alan Homes Development Building/Fire comments Upon review of documents provided for the development of multi-family dwelling units located at 6000 Brooklyn Blvd & 6900 Brooklyn Blvd. Items that are listed below need to be addressed: 1)A SAC determination shall be provided by MET Council with a determination letter presented to the Building Department prior to permit issuance. 2)City SAC /WAC fee is based on a determination of MET Council. If any MET Council SAC fee is applied to a structure. City SAC/WAC is applied on the Sewer and Water permit application as per Fee table located on back. Multi-family “Less than 5 acres” $4500 per multi-family structure in addition to state surcharge. 3)The buildings are considered a group R2. Per Chapter 11 and ICC ANSI A117.1-2009 with MN Amendments 1107.6.2.2.1. In Group R2 occupancies containing more than seven (7) dwelling units, at least 2 percent but not less than one of the units shall be a Type A unit. All group R2 units within a contiguous parcel of land development, irrespective of lot lines and public rights-of-way within the development, shall be considered to determine the total number of units and the required number of Type A units. a.Each development shall be provided with (1) Type A unit. b.The remaining units are NOT required to be Type B units as there is not (4) four or more dwelling units in a single structure per Chapter 11 and ICC ANSI A117.1-2009 with MN Amendments 1107.6.2.2.2. 4)At least (1) one accessible route within the site shall be provided from public transportation stops, accessible parking, accessible passenger loading zones and public streets or sidewalk to the accessible building entrance served Chapter 11 and ICC ANSI A117.1-2009 with MN Amendments 1104.1. An exterior accessible route with a slope not steeper than 1:20 that are part of an accessible route shall be (48”) forty-eight inches minimum in width per Chapter 11 and ICC ANSI A117.1-2009 with MN Amendments 403.5.4. a.Both sites that are to be provided with an accessible Type A unit shall have an exterior accessible route be provided to the main entrance of the dwelling unit. Exhibit E City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3300 | www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org 5) Accessible parking requirements and space for Group R2 occupancies shall be provided with not less than 1 accessible parking space and access aisle. 6) Buildings are NOT required to sprinklered per the Special Fire Protection systems subp. 2 adopted by the City of Brooklyn Center or by MNBC & MNFC 903.2.8 when a group R2 building area is less than 4,500 square feet. 7) Fire Department access roads that have a dead end shall not be in excess of (150’) one hundred-fifty feet or shall be provided with an approved area for turning around per MNFC 503.2.5. Exception where a dead-end road serves a Group R building that are equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with NFPA, the maximum dead-end length distance is permitted to be increased up to (300’) three hundred feet. 8) Fire hydrants shall be provided, if not already existing and compliant if a building within the jurisdiction is more than 300 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road as measured by and approved route around the exterior of the facility or buildings. On site fire hydrants and mains shall be provide where required by the fire code official per MNFC 507.5.1. Dan Grinsteinner Building Official City of Brooklyn Center 763-569-3313 1 583218v1BR291-4 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the ____ day of __________, 2020, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as part of the regular City Council meeting to consider an Ordinance amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances regarding the zoning classification of certain lands located along Brooklyn Boulevard. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please notify the City Clerk at 763-569-3306 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. 2020- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LANDS LOCATED ALONG BROOKLYN BOULEVARD THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Rezoning. Chapter 35, Section 35-1240 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended as follows: Section 35-1240. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUD). The following property is hereby established as being within a (PUD) Planned Unit Development District Zoning Classification: 12. The following properties are designated as PUD-N/MU (Neighborhood Mixed Use) District: Robertson & Brekke’s Brookyln Boulevard First Addition, Lots 1 through 7, Block 1. Robertson & Brekke’s Brookyln Boulevard Second Addition, Lots 1 through 6, Block 1. Adopted this day of , 2020. _____________________________ Mike Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Date of Publication 2 583218v1BR291-4 Effective Date (Note: Strikeout text indicates matter to be delete, double underline text indicates new matter.) Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2020-004 FOR PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT AND SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVALS AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE 6000 BLOCK OF BROOKLYN BOULEVARD AND KNOWN AS 6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2020-004, submitted by C Alan Homes (“the Applicant”), requests review and consideration for approval of a preliminary plat, final plat, and site and building plan, and establishment of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for four properties currently owned by the Economic Development Authority (EDA) of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, located just south of 61st Avenue North and west of Brooklyn Boulevard, and known as 6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 Brooklyn Boulevard (“the Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is currently a mix of C1 (Service/Office), R5 (Multiple Family Residence), and R1 (One Family Residence) District properties under the City’s Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the Applicant appeared before the City Council of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota on May 11, 2020 for a concept plan review of their proposed development of seven (7) triplexes and related site improvements on the Subject Property, in conjunction with a second proposal from the Applicant to construct another six (6) triplexes and related improvements to the north of the Subject Property at 6921, 6927, 6933, and 6939 Brooklyn Boulevard, and submitted for separate consideration under Planning Commission Application No. 2020-005; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 2020, the City Council of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota approved a Preliminary Development Agreement with C Alan Homes, LLC for the two aforementioned sets of properties located along Brooklyn Boulevard to allow the Applicant time to review the properties, obtain financing, work through City land use approvals, and negotiate with the EDA on the purchase of the properties pending approval of the aforementioned Planning Commission Application No. 2020-004; and WHEREAS, a public hearing for Planning Commission Application No. 2020-004 was initially scheduled for July 9, 2020; however, City staff exercised its rights under Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, Subd. 3(f) to extend the review period for an additional sixty (60) days to allow the Applicant additional time to reconcile adjustments necessary to the site plan for additional easements and determine the ability for driveway access off Brooklyn Boulevard from Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, on August 13, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota received and reviewed a planning report on the proposed preliminary plat, final plat, site and building plan, and Planned Unit Development proposals for the proposed new construction of seven (7) triplexes and related site improvements on the approximately 1.65 acre site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota held a duly noticed and called public hearing on August 13, 2020, whereby a planning staff report was presented and public testimony regarding the proposal were received. Notice of such public hearing was published in the official newspaper and notices were mailed to adjacent property owners as required by City Code, and notification signage was installed on the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota considered the requests in light of all testimony received, the guidelines and standards for evaluating the preliminary and final plat under Chapter 15 (Platting), site and building plans under Chapter 35 (Zoning) and specifically Section 35-230 (Plan Approval), and Planned Unit Developments as contained in Section 35-355 (Planned Unit Development) of the City’s Zoning Code, including compliance with the guidelines for re-zoning properties, and the request complies with the general goals and objectives of the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property would be re-zoned from a mix of C1 (Service/Office), R5 (Multiple Family Residence), and R1 (One Family Residence) Districts to PUD-N/MU (Planned Unit Development-Neighborhood/Mixed Use) District, which is consistent with the density allowed under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and reconciles the Subject Property density allowances, as the Subject Property is currently a mix of Neighborhood-Mixed Use, High Density Residential, and Low Density Residential future land uses designations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota to recommend that Planning Commission Application No. 2020-004, submitted by C Alan Homes, be approved based upon the findings of fact in the August 13, 2020, planning report and submitted plans, as amended by the following conditions of approval: Anticipated Permitting 1. The Applicant shall apply for and receive a City Land Disturbance permit prior to commencing any grading or land clearance activities on the site. 2. The Applicant shall apply for and receive an NPDES permit from the MPCA. 3. The Applicant shall obtain any required permits from Hennepin County for work in the County right-of-way. 4. The Applicant shall meet all requirements of the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission, as specified by the City. 5. The Applicant shall apply for and receive all applicable City building permits prior to commencing construction of any work. 6. Other permits not listed may be required and is the responsibility of the developer to obtain and warrant. 7. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of applicable building and land disturbance permits. 8. A preconstruction conference must be scheduled and held with City staff and other entities designated by the City. Plat Review 9. Approval of the preliminary and final plats are contingent upon the addressing of comments by Assistant City Engineer Hogg in his memorandum dated August 4, 2020 and revised August 17, 2020, consolidation of the south outlot to proposed lot #7, and updating of the title block per City staff comments. a. The Applicant shall complete the vacation of any identified easements and ensure notice of completion of vacation is recorded with Hennepin County prior to recording of final plat and mylar. 10. Final plat and mylar shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Code of Ordinances (Platting). 11. Any comments and/or requirements as provided by Hennepin County. 12. Any comments and/or requirements from the City Attorney’s office, and specifically regarding an updated certified abstract of title. 13. The successful recording of said plat (mylar) with Hennepin County. PUD / Site Plan Review 14. Any significant changes or modifications made to this request can only be made by an amendment to the approved Planned Unit Development and site and building plan as approved by the City Council. 15. The Applicant shall enter into a Purchase Agreement with the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center prior to the execution of the Final Plat. 16. The Applicant shall enter into a PUD Agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center prior to the execution of the Final Plat. 17. The Applicant shall distribute Section 8 units through each of the identified three floors of triplex buildings identified for Section 8 voucher holders so as to prevent designating a particular level for such units. 18. The Applicant shall execute a Performance Agreement with supporting financial guarantee approved by the City prior to the issuance of any permits. 19. The Applicant shall enter into a Construction Management Plan and Agreement, and supporting escrow deposited, prior to the issuance of a Land Disturbance Permit. 20. The Applicant shall enter into a Public Improvement Agreement prior to the issuance of a Land Disturbance Permit. 21. The Applicant shall enter into a Utility Facilities Easement Agreement prior to the issuance of a Land Disturbance Permit. Engineering Review 22. The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer’s Review memorandum, dated August 4, 2020. a. Final grading, drainage, utility, and erosion control plans and any other site engineering related issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer for City site and building plan approval and prior to the issuance of permits. Fire Inspector/ Building Official Review 23. The Applicant shall work to ensure all applicable 2015 Minnesota Fire Code requirements have been met as part of any plan approval. 24. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 25. The Applicant shall apply for a SAC determination from the Metropolitan Council. Said determination shall be forwarded to the City and paid for upon issuance of any City permits. 26. The Applicant shall work with the Building Official to address all minimum requirements for accessibility as they relate to units, parking, accessible routes, etc. August 24, 2020 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:8/24/2020 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:C urt Boganey, City Manager T H R O U G H :M eg Beekman, C ommunity D evelopment D irector BY:G inny M cI ntosh, City P lanner / Zoning A dminis trator S U B J E C T:Res olu/on Regarding P lanning C ommis s ion A pplica/on No. 2020-004 for P reliminary and F inal P lat and S ite and Building P lan A pprovals , and the Establis hment of a P lanned Unit D evelopment for Certain P roper/es Located in the 6900 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard (C ommonly Known as 6921, 6927, 6933, and 6939 Brooklyn Boulevard) B ackground: C A lan H omes (“The A pplicant ”) is reques /ng approval of a preliminary and final plat, s ite and building plan, and es tablishment of a P lanned U nit D evelopment for a s er ies of pr oper /es located w ithin the 6900 block of Brooklyn Boulevard, located just north of S lim’s Res taurant and 69th Avenue North, and wes t of Brooklyn Boulevard. These proper/es are all cur rently ow ned by the Economic D ev elopment A uthority of Brooklyn C enter and encompas s the following addresses : 6 9 2 1 , 6 9 2 7 , 6 9 3 3 , and 6939 Br ookly n Boulevard (“The S ubject P roperty ”). This reques t is associated with a s econd reques t from C A lan H omes to develop a s econd s et of triplexes along the 6 0 0 0 B lock of Brooklyn Boulevard at the addres s es commonly known as 6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 Br ookly n Boulev ard, and filed separately for considera/on under P lanning Commission A pplica/on No. 2020-004. O n May 11, 2020, C A lan H omes ' concept plan for the 6000 and 6900 blocks of Brooklyn Boulevard, as contemplated under P lanning Commission A pplica/on N os . 2 0 2 0 -0 0 4 and 2020-005, w as pr es ented to the City C ouncil for Concept Review. The proposal was to develop two s eparate sites along Br ookly n Boulevard into a combined 1 3 triplex buildings (39 total dwelling units ), and addr es s ed the re-plaHng of eight (8 ) E DA - ow ned lots into tw o s eparate development sites to allow for said redev elopment. The proposal for the S ubject P roperty contemplates cons truc/on of s ix (6) triplexes for a total of 18 dwelling units and associated site improvements . O n J une 22, 2020, City C ouncil approv ed a P reliminary D evelopment A greement w ith C A lan H omes , L L C for the tw o s ets of E DA -owned pr oper /es . The purpos e of this agreement was to allow the A pplicant /me to rev iew the property, obtain financing, and nego/ate w ith the E D A of Brooklyn Center on an agreement for the purchas e of the S ubject P roperty and property to the south (6000 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard). This A greement is s et to expire on D ecember 31, 2 0 2 0 but allow s the /me neces s ary to wor k thr ough the land us e approvals contemplated under this applica/on. S hould the A pplicant r eceive approval for the proposed us e, the E DA w ould need to nego/ate a purchas e agreement for the S ubj ect P roperty, which w ould require a separate public hearing and approval from the E DA . A public hearing was or iginally s cheduled at the P lanning C ommis s ion mee/ng for J uly 9 , 2020; how ever, this hearing w as re-s cheduled follow ing City s taff concerns regarding adjus tments to the s ubmiKed s ite plan to account for addi/onal eas ements r equir ed for a sidew alk re-alignment, and ques/ons s urrounding acces s off B rook lyn Boulevard. A public no/ce was publis hed in the B rook lyn Center S un Post on June 25th, 2020, and two separate s ets of mail no/ces were s ent out to both taxpayers and res idents in proximity of the S ubject P roperty w ith a one-page informa/onal fly er on the project. C ity s taff installed a “D evelopment Under Review ” sign on the S ubject P roperty for addi/onal no/ce. The P lanning Commis s ion held a joint public hearing for P lanning C ommis s ion A pplica/on Nos . 2020-004 and 2020-005 at their mee/ng on A ugus t 13, 2020. T he dis cus s ion was lengthy and cov ered a range of topics , including: s creening and buffering fr om adjacent s ingle-family residen/al, minimum parking requirements , on-street parking concer ns and traffic, management of the proper/es , and the propos ed loca/ons and finishes for the proposed 20-percent of units set aside for S ec/on 8 voucher holders . A few res idents w er e in aKendance for the v irtual public hearing, and City staff r eceived calls from a few other r es idents in advance of the mee/ng. The comments from the public during the hearing regarding the S ubject P roperty related s pecifically to the minimum park ing needs for the S ubject P roperty and concerns from a nearby res ident regarding traffic and park ing on the s treets, as the r es ident currently has issues with res idents of W illow L ane A partments w ho r epor tedly park along the dead end por/on of 70th Avenue North, jus t north of the S ubject P roperty. Following clos e of the public hearing and addi/onal dis cus s ion among the P lanning C ommis s ioner s and the A pplicant, the P lanning C ommis s ion elected to unanimously (7 -0 ) recommend City Council approv al of the requested preliminary and final plat, site and building plan, and establis hment of a P lanned Unit D evelopment, w ith the caveat that the as s ociated res olu/on be amended to pr ovide language outlining that the S ec/on 8 units be offered on vary ing floors of the tr iplex, r ather than just the basement or garden units , as was originally indicated by the A pplicant. Follow ing dis cus s ion, the A pplicant agreed with Commissioners and expres s ed a w illingnes s to comply w ith this request. A copy of the P lanning C ommis s ion Report for P lanning C ommis s ion A pplica/on No. 2020-005, dated A ugust 1 3 , 2020, and the C ity C ouncil res olu/on regarding the approv al of the pr eliminar y and final plats , s ite and building plan, and establis hment are included w ith this memorandum. T he C ity ’s E ngineering D ivision prepared an updated memorandum, dated August 17, 2020 to reflect clarifica/on in co mments and requirements as rela/ng to the preliminary and final plats. Said memorandum has been incorporated into the staff report exhibits. Finally, f o llo wing discussio n with the C ity AKorney ’s offi ce, C ity staff incorporated an addi/o nal condi/on that the Applicant vacate a ll easements as necessa ry per the C ity E ngineer and file no /ce o f comple/on of va c a/on with the Hennepin C ounty Rec o rder ’s o ffice prio r to filing of the final plat and associated Mylar. A s the r eques t by the A pplica/on includes a reques t to re-z one the S ubject P roperty from C-1 (S ervice/O ffice) D is trict to P lanned U nit D ev elopment-Neighborhood/M ixed Use (P U D -N/M U ) D is trict, C ity Code dictates that the C ity Zoning O rdinance be amended to reflect the r e-z oning. A dr aP copy of the ordinance language is included for review. S hould the C ity Council proceed w ith the re-zoning, a mo/on to approve a fir s t reading of an or dinance amending C hapter 3 5 of the Zoning C ode of O rdinances regarding the S ubject P roperty located at 6921, 6927, 6 9 3 3 , and 6939 Brooklyn Boulevard w ould be needed. Following the mo/on, a second reading and public hearing would be s cheduled for S eptember 14, 2020. B udget I ssues: None to cons ider at this /me. S trategic Priories and Values: Enhanced Community I mage, Targeted Redevelopment AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip/on U pload D ate Type P C S taff Report and Exhibits - 6900 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard - C A lan H omes, L L C 8/18/2020 Backup M aterial Res olu/on - D is pos i/on of P lanning Commission A pplica/on No. 2020-005 8/18/2020 Resolu/on LeKer O rdinance-A mending C hapter 35 of the City Code of O rdinances Regarding the Zoning Clas s ifica/on of Certain L ands A long Brooklyn Boulevard 8/18/2020 O rdinance App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 1 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: August 13, 2020 Application No. 2020-005 Applicant: C Alan Homes Location: 6900 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard (6921, 6927, 6933, and 6939 Brooklyn Boulevard) Requests: (1) Preliminary and Final Plat, (2) Site and Building Plan, (3) Establishment of a Planned Unit Development for the development of six triplexes and related site improvements REQUESTED ACTION C Alan Homes (“The Applicant”) is requesting approval of a preliminary and final plat, site and building plan, and establishment of a Planned Unit Development for a series of properties located within the 6900 block of Brooklyn Boulevard, just north of 69th Avenue North and Slim’s, and west of Brooklyn Boulevard (Exhibit A). These properties are all currently owned by the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center and encompass the following addresses: 6921, 6927, 6933, and 6939 Brooklyn Boulevard. Due to the nature of the requests, including the establishment of a Planned Unit Development and preliminary and final plat approvals, a public hearing is required. A public notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on June 25th, 2020 (Exhibit B). Following City staff concerns regarding adjustments to the submitted site plan to account for additional easements and questions surrounding driveway access off Brooklyn Boulevard from Hennepin County, City staff requested an extension to the application review period as granted under Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, Subd. 3 (f)—refer to Exhibit C. This request was intended to provide additional time for the Applicant to address the aforementioned items. Due to the continuance of the public hearing, City staff mailed updated public notices out to residents and/or taxpayers and incorporated a one page informational flyer on the project in the mailing. City staff also requested Public Works install a “Development Proposal Under Review” sign on site which provides a contact number for any questions regarding the proposal. Since the requested extension, the Applicant has revised the site plan to reflect the necessary easements along Brooklyn Boulevard and the City was provided with a recommendation from Hennepin County regarding driveway access off Brooklyn Boulevard, which is detailed in this report. BACKGROUND Developer The City was approached by Terry Robertson and Curt Brekke with C Alan Homes, a local builder and remodeling company specializing in high-end single family homes, in the spring of 2020. Mr. Robertson and Mr. Brekke are interested in diversifying the focus of C Alan Homes and are seeking to develop two sets of EDA-owned sites along Brooklyn Boulevard with a series of triplexes that would be available for • Application Filed: 6/15/2020 • Review Period (60-day) Deadline: 8/14/2020 • Extension Declared: 7/7/2020 • Extended Review Period Deadline: 10/13/2020 App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 2 rent. Each triplex would consist of three, three bedroom units. The anticipated rents would likely range between $1,850 and $2,200 per month, and the Applicant has committed to providing 20% of the units as set aside for Section 8 voucher holders. Due to the Applicant’s background in high-end single family home construction, the Applicant has indicated that each building would have the look and feel of a large, high quality single family home, with a combination of individual and shared on-site amenities. Conformance with City Policies and Property Background The EDA has been acquiring single family and undersized parcels along Brooklyn Boulevard for many years as part of a larger strategy to improve safety by reducing and consolidating access points, and assembling land for redevelopment into higher density land uses. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan created an overlay district along the corridor and re-guided most of the future land uses to “Neighborhood Mixed Use” or “NMU;” allowing medium density residential and/or neighborhood-serving commercial uses. As transportation and land use patterns along the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor have changed, the EDA has strategically acquired property for redevelopment. Although the Subject Property lies just north of the area identified for the Brooklyn Boulevard reconstruction and modernization project, which ends around 65th Avenue North, land use patterns will be affected as access points are consolidated and the roadway altered to allow for a more walkable, neighborhood-oriented development pattern. As a result of the roadway reconstruction plans, as well as the re-guiding of most of the future land uses along the corridor, the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan Implementation Chapter included a plan for a comprehensive land use study of the Brooklyn Center corridor, which is currently underway. The intended outcome of the land use study will result in the creation of a regulatory framework for development along the corridor as well as design guidelines to help facilitate the creation of a more walkable, neighborhood-oriented development pattern along the entirety of Brooklyn Boulevard. The Brooklyn Boulevard land use study will include a health impact assessment as well as a market analysis of the area in terms of feasible land uses. One of the goals of the study is to look at EDA-owned sites, and particularly those that are only as deep as a single-family lot, to determine how they could be redeveloped in ways that puts them back into productive use without negatively impacting surrounding neighborhoods. The recently completed market analysis found that a mid-density residential product, such as row- homes or townhomes, or a low density office condo product, would be suitable along the corridor between controlled intersections given the access constraints that will exist after the majority of Brooklyn Boulevard is reconstructed. The market analysis further indicated that higher intensity commercial/retail uses would be more suitable around signalized intersections where access is better. The market analysis also found the current market would likely not bear new low and mid-rise multi- family housing development without subsidy given low market rents. The findings of the market analysis are not unique to Brooklyn Center. The cost of construction, combined with the challenge of putting together financing for projects, make it difficult to complete multi-family developments without some form of gap financing or subsidy. As a result, the vast majority of multi-family housing that is built is either market rate and in locations that can achieve the highest rents, or alternatively, affordable housing, financed through federal sources and maintained at rents affordable to those making 50-60% area median income. Very little housing is constructed that is App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 3 considered affordable to those mid-income earners making between 80-120% area median incomes. So little, in fact, that in cities across the nation this type of housing is called “the missing middle”. The land use study found that the vacancy rate for apartments along Brooklyn Boulevard is 1.3%, with lower than average market rents. The study notes that there is an opportunity to add newer inventory of all unit types, including market-rate, workforce, affordable, and senior housing. With current rental rates in Brooklyn Center low compared to the rest of the market, increasing construction costs, and higher capitalization rates (which help indicate an anticipated “rate of return” on investments and overall risk), lower density multi-family developments, such as triplexes, duplexes, and perhaps townhouses, are outlined in the market analysis as a potentially more feasible option. The EDA currently owns four properties located at the northwest corner of 69th Avenue North and Brooklyn Boulevard, which total approximately 0.98 acres. These properties, in addition to a series of four properties on the west side of the 6000 block of Brooklyn Boulevard (1.65 acres), are both under consideration for the development of triplexes by C Alan Homes, and are identified under Planning Commission Application Nos. 2020-004 (6000 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard) and 2020-005 (6900 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard). Although these development proposals are for the same type of product and the same application requests, a separate staff report has been prepared for each of the sites. On May 11, 2020, C Alan Homes' concept plan for the 6000 and 6900 blocks of Brooklyn Boulevard, as contemplated under Planning Commission Application Nos. 2020-004 and 2020-005, was presented to the City Council for Concept Review. The proposal was to develop two separate sites along Brooklyn Boulevard into a combined 13 triplex buildings (39 total dwelling units). The proposal addressed the re- platting of eight (8) EDA-owned lots into two separate development sites to allow for said redevelopment. On June 22, 2020, City Council approved a Preliminary Development Agreement with C Alan Homes, LLC for the two sets of EDA-owned properties. The purpose of this agreement was to allow the Applicant time to review the property, obtain financing, and negotiate with the EDA of Brooklyn Center on an agreement for the purchase of the Subject Property and property to the south (6000 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard). This Agreement is set to expire on December 31, 2020 but also allows the time necessary to work through the land use approvals contemplated under this application. Should the Applicant receive approval for the proposed use, the EDA would need to negotiate a purchase agreement for the Subject Property, which would require a separate public hearing and approval from the EDA. Site Data 2040 Land Use Plan: Neighborhood Mixed Use (N-MU @ 15.01-31 DU/Ac.) Neighborhood: Willow Lane Current Zoning: C1 (Service/Office) District Site Area: 0.98 acres Surrounding Area Direction 2040 Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use North High Density Residential (HDR) R5 (Multi-Family Residence) Apartment Building South Neighborhood- Mixed Use (NMU) PUD/C2 (Planned Unit Development/Commerce) Restaurant App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 4 East Right-of-Way Right-of-Way (ROW) Brooklyn Boulevard West Neighborhood- Mixed Use (NMU) R-1 (One Family Residence) SF Detached Note: The Subject Property is located within the identified Brooklyn Boulevard Overlay District under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Map 1. Subject Property COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Subject Property is currently comprised of four properties, all with an identified future land use designation of “Neighborhood-Mixed Use.” As proposed, the Subject Property would be located within the identified Brooklyn Boulevard Overlay District, which is a 1,200 foot wide corridor. The 2040 Plan stresses the creation of a walkable, transit connected, experience-based place that brings the City forward and offers new opportunities to existing and future residents. “The idea that the community will thrive with a more integrated land use pattern is fully accepted, and promoted through this Plan. The areas that are planned for this type of change are guided within this Plan for Neighborhood Mixed-Use, Commercial Mixed-Use, Business Mixed-Use and/or are designated in the Brooklyn Boulevard Overlay District.” The 2040 Comprehensive Plan also identifies the following Housing and Neighborhood Goals: • Promote a diverse housing stock that provides safe, stable, and accessible housing options to all App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 5 of Brooklyn Center’s residents. • Recognize and identify ways to match Brooklyn Center’s housing with the City’s changing demographics. Approximately 37% of the City’s housing stock is comprised of rental housing, the vast majority as multi- family units. The majority of multi-family units in the City were constructed prior to 1979, with the bulk of units having been constructed between 1966 and 1969, making the majority of multi-family inventory between 51 to 54 years in age. With the exception of the two Real Estate Equities projects currently under construction at Northway Drive and County Road 10, there has been no new construction of multi-family units since the 1970s. With the exception of three rental townhome developments, all of the City’s multi-family rental housing is comprised of one and two-bedroom units. As a result of this highly homogenous housing stock, the cost of housing in Brooklyn Center fits within a relatively narrow affordability band. One of the goals of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is to provide a more diverse range of housing options and price points, which makes for a more economically resilient community. As part of the community engagement process for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan residents expressed a need for larger rental units. More diverse housing options would allow families to stay in Brooklyn Center if they chose as their housing needs change. In fact, the City sees a drop in population relative to Hennepin County in residents aged 45 to 65. This is due to residents moving out to find alternative housing options as their families grow. The proposed project would provide a housing type that would fulfill a segment of this current housing gap in the community. Since 2010, the number of households with children in both single-parent and married couple households has grown significantly, and the percentage of Brooklyn Center households with children is approaching 40 percent, which is well above the rate in Hennepin County and the metro area. Unlike the surrounding region, the median age of Brooklyn Center residents is younger, at 32.8 years old. This is largely due to a significant increase in residents aged 25 to 34, who oftentimes are starting families and having children. The Metropolitan Council projects that the City of Brooklyn Center will add nearly 2,000 new households to the community between 2020 and 2040. Given that the City is mostly built out, it is expected that a substantial portion of future housing would be provided in the form of multi-family units. Residents also communicated a desire to have housing options that were closer to supportive retail, commercial, and services so that they could walk, bike, or easily use transit to meet their needs. REQUESTS The nature of the Applicant’s requests would require approval of a preliminary and final plat to accommodate the anticipated site improvements and triplex buildings, the establishment of a Planned Unit Development to offer certain flexibility for the intended use and alignment with the recently adopted 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and approval of a site and building plan, as all properties above an R2 (One and Two Family Residence) District use require one. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT The proposed preliminary and final plat for what would be known as ROBERTSON AND BREKKE’S BROOKLYN BOULEVARD SECOND ADDITION would subdivide four (4) existing Economic Development Authority (EDA) of Brooklyn Center lots into six (6) new parcels to accommodate the six (6) proposed triplexes at the Subject Property located just north of 69th Avenue North and west of Brooklyn Boulevard. App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 6 Per comments #44 through #47 provided in the memorandum by Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg and dated August 4, 2020 (Exhibit D), the Applicant will need to address edits necessary to reflect vacated easements, proposed easements, existing and proposed utilities, and all associated easement documents for City review. A 10 foot drainage and utility easement is required for dedication around the entire perimeter of the Subject Property. An additional utility easement shall be dedicated on the plat to allow for any future maintenance of private water mains and sanitary sewer per Development Agreement requirements. The Applicant will need to submit legal descriptions and easement vacations for all existing easements and certain vacations of existing public easements, as determined by the City. The Applicant shall also provide and maintain a current abstract of title for City Attorney review. Following a review of the submitted final plat, the title block shall be updated to reflect “Brooklyn Center, Minnesota,” and “City Council of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota.” The submitted plat currently displays “Bloomington” in the text. The title block should also contain an attest section for the City Clerk. Based on the above noted findings and conditions above, City staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the requested approval of a preliminary and final plat for ROBERTSON AND BREKKE’S BROOKLYN BOULEVARD SECOND ADDITION for the Subject Property located on what is currently known as 6921, 6927, 6933, and 6939 Brooklyn Boulevard, subject to the Applicant complying with the Conditions of Approval as noted below, and the related requests for the approval of a site and building plan and establishment of a Planned Unit Development. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The Subject Property is currently zoned a C1 (Service/Office) District. The Applicant is requesting the property be re-zoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to accommodate the intended site improvements and housing product, which would offer three (3) dwelling units in each of the six (6) proposed triplex buildings. PUDs grant flexibility within the Zoning Code to allow for developments which would not be allowed under the existing regulations. PUDs are often used to achieve a higher quality development, or achieve other City goals, in exchange for granting zoning flexibility from the City Code. Section 35-355 (Planned Unit Development) of the City Zoning Code notes that upon the rezoning for a PUD, the district shall be designated by the letters “PUD” followed by the alphanumeric designation of the underlying zoning district, which may be either the prior zoning classification or a new classification. Given that the major update to the City Zoning Code is currently underway and changes to districts are anticipated in order to align with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the request would be to re-zone following guidance from the 2040 Comprehensive Plan future land use designations for the Subject Property. PUDs may only contain uses consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the uniqueness of each PUD requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities, public facilities, and the approval of a land subdivision may be subject to modifications from the City ordinances generally governing them— essentially the City Council may approve plans that are not in compliance with the usual specifications or ordinance requirements where it is found that such are not required in the interests of residents or the City, although plans shall comply with all watershed, state, and federal storm water, erosion control, and wetlands requirements. App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 7 Therefore, the proposed rezoning would be to PUD-NMU (Neighborhood Mixed Use). “Neighborhood Mixed Use” is a new future land use designation that guides surrounding key neighborhood intersections for a mix of residential, retail, and commercial/office uses. This designation plans for the redevelopment of existing uses and assumes that a minimum of 50% of the land within this designation would be used for residential purposes, at densities between 15.01 to 31 dwelling units per acre, and the remaining areas under this land use designation would be developed with neighborhood scale retail, service, and commercial uses. The designation allows for mixed uses on each parcel, but does not require it. All four parcels comprising the Subject Property hold a future land use designation of “Neighborhood Mixed Use” (refer to Map 2 below). With a total of 0.98 acres designated at 15.01-31 DU/Acre, there could be between 15 to 30 units on-site. As submitted, the proposal calls for the construction of 18 total units on the Subject Property, which falls within the lower end of the range noted above. Map 2. Future Land Use Designations (2040 Comprehensive Plan) The front setbacks requested under the application are generally less than what is allowed by Code for residential properties along a major thoroughfare (50 feet), which would severely limit the development of anything on the Subject Property, and the proposed front porches would therefore encroach closer to the property lines than is typically permitted. However, the proposed setbacks align with the guidance of the Comprehensive Plan to bring buildings closer to the corridor, provide parking in the rear, and create a more walkable, pedestrian friendly environment. A typical residential property not located on a major thoroughfare, be it single family or multi-family, requires a 35 foot front yard setback. The proposal also requests a higher percentage of three (3) bedroom units than is typically called for in the Zoning Code (no more than 10-percent); however, there are instances of multi-family dwelling units providing three (3) bedroom rental products at select multi-family properties in the City, such as Georgetown, Emerson Chalet, and Victoria Townhomes. The PUD proposal is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan in that it would align with the City’s strategic goal of Targeted Redevelopment by providing a type of mid-market housing that would fill a need in the community for larger unit rental dwelling units. The type of product proposed within this App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 8 development would feature three (3) bedroom units with an estimated rent of between $1,850 to $2,200 per month, although these numbers have yet to be finalized. The Applicant is not requesting any municipal subsidy at this time, and has indicated plans to set aside 20% of the total units for Section 8 Voucher holders. The anticipated rents are considered affordable to those making 70-80% Area Median Income (AMI). As approval of any development plan for the Subject Property shall constitute a rezoning to PUD, approvals to establish a PUD require the City Council to base its actions on the rezoning under the following criteria: 1. Compatibility of the plan with the standards, purposes, and intent of this section (Section 35- 355); 2. Consistency of the plan with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; 3. The impact of the plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located; and 4. The adequacy of internal site organization, uses, densities, circulation, parking facilities, public facilities, recreational areas, open spaces, and buffering and landscaping. Based on the above noted findings and conditions above, City staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the requested establishment of a Planned Unit Development to allow for the re-zoning of the Subject Property, located on what is currently known as 6921, 6927, 6933, and 6939 Brooklyn Boulevard, to be re-zoned to PUD-NMU (Planned Unit Development-Neighborhood Mixed Use) District, subject to the Applicant complying with the Conditions of Approval as noted below, and the receiving approvals for the related preliminary and final plat and site and building plans. SITE AND BUILDING PLAN The Applicant submitted plans for review as part of their proposal, along with a stormwater management plan, landscape plan, architectural renderings, and civil set containing utility, grading, drainage, and site plans. City staff reviewed the plans that were submitted and have provided comments for this report below: Site Design The proposed south site, located within the 6900 block of Brooklyn Boulevard, just north of 69th Avenue North and Slim’s, and west of Brooklyn Boulevard, proposes construction of six (6) triplexes on approximately 0.98 acres. Each unit would contain a garden (or basement unit), a ground (main) level unit, and an upper level unit. As proposed, each triplex building would be approximately 3,885 feet in size, and provide approximately 1,295 square feet of living space per unit. Setbacks All setbacks in the proposal are measured from the right-of-way (ROW). As the City has requested the Applicant provide a 10 foot boulevard with a 5 foot sidewalk and maintenance strip to allow for the realignment of existing sidewalk along Brooklyn Boulevard, the Subject Property is fairly shallow and faces space constraints given that the Subject Property was formerly comprised of single family properties. The chart below compares the current setback requirements with the requested standards for the proposed PUD. The underlying “Neighborhood Mixed Use” designation is a new designation that is not currently reflected in the Zoning Code; however, a major update to the Zoning Code is underway. In App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 9 reviewing the typical setbacks for a medium density residential product (R3 and R4 Districts under current Zoning Code), City staff finds the following: Table 1. Setback Flexibility Requests Current Standard Requested Flexibility Front Yard Setback 50 feet (major thoroughfares) 35 feet (from front wall) Note: Minimum 25 foot setback assuming maximum 10 foot porch encroachment under Zoning Code 11 feet (from front wall) Interior Yard Setback 10 feet -- Corner Yard Setback 25 feet -- Rear Yard Setback 40 -- As the Subject Property was formerly the location of four (4) single family homes, the six (6) proposed triplexes are able to maintain a fairly consistent setback along Brooklyn Boulevard. Between the Brooklyn Boulevard reconstruction and modernization project, which ends just blocks south of the Subject Property, and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives, the intent has been to create a more walkable, transit connected, and experience-based place. Phase II of the Brooklyn Boulevard Project, which will terminate near 65th Avenue North, is intended to enhance bicycle and pedestrian travel by adding trail, improving sidewalks, transit stops, adding streetscaping and landscaping, and improving the overall functionality of intersections. As proposed, the existing sidewalk located along the eastern edge of the Subject Property would be re-aligned per City requirements, which requires additional spacing for a boulevard and sidewalk maintenance strip. As the Subject Property is located within the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor and given the overarching desire to connect properties to the aforementioned amenities, City staff is comfortable with the proposed setbacks, particularly as the Brooklyn Boulevard project is requiring additional right-of-way to accommodate the re-aligned sidewalk that would run adjacent to the proposed triplexes. Furthermore, the positioning of the triplexes closer to the roadway and sidewalk enhances the walkability for residents who might potentially reside in one of the triplexes. This is as opposed to creating a more car- oriented feel by positioning a parking lot in front of the building, thus requiring potential residents to navigate the parking lot before entering their homes. Further, it is anticipated that the future Neighborhood Mixed Use zoning district will encourage shorter front yard setbacks along Brooklyn Boulevard to maximize setbacks from adjacent single family homes to the rear and encourage more walkability. Architectural Materials At this time, the City references a set of architectural design guidelines based off the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. To that end, the building materials referenced are typically intended for more commercial type projects (e.g. glazing, brick, stucco). Per the Applicant, the intent is to utilize modern James Hardie panels for siding with aluminum soffits and fascia to distinguish the north triplex project from the south triplex project, which has a more traditional appeal. Each unit would be fitted with custom cabinetry with solid core doors and luxury vinyl tile flooring, and the buildings would feature a concrete patio in the rear. App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 10 The garden (basement) units would feature a large daylit window well running almost the entirety of the building width, while the main floor units would feature a front porch facing Brooklyn Boulevard. The Applicant also proposes to install a patio on the rear of each triplex building with grills, and the proximity to neighboring Willow Lane Park would offer residents with access to a playground, basketball court, softball field, skating rink, and picnicking area. City staff indicated that the Applicant should strive to create a uniqueness about each building so as to create some vibrancy along the Boulevard through the use of differing roof pitches, siding colors, etc. The Applicant indicated that this was their intent. Image 1. Example Renderings of Proposed Triplex Buildings in 6900 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 11 Image 2. Example Main (1st) Floor Unit Access and Parking The Applicant proposes to install a driveway access off Lee Avenue North. Said access would run south along the western edge of the Subject Property before heading to a right only access off Brooklyn Boulevard. This access is reserved for emergency vehicles only per Hennepin County’s recommendation. Per the submitted site plan, the access would feature lockable bollards positioned at the end of the drive to allow for efficient snow removal. As the driveway and parking will cross through all six (6) new lots, the Applicant will need to have cross access agreements in place. As proposed, the drive aisle would only be 18 feet wide, which is below the minimum required for two- way traffic and 90-degree parking. City staff is requesting the Applicant revise the plans to allow for a 20-foot drive aisle, which is the minimum required for a fire access road under the Fire Code. This may require alterations to the front covered porches and rear patios. The Applicant notes 18 foot deep parking spaces, which is the minimum required, and tighter parking spaces provided at the minimum 8.66 feet in width. Assuming a total of 18 dwelling units, the Applicant would need to provide a minimum of two (2) spaces per dwelling unit, or 36 on-site parking spaces. As proposed, the Applicant is providing 30 spaces, which is 6 spaces shy of the minimum requirements. City staff is requesting the Applicant revise the site plans to determine if additional parking can be accommodated for on the separate five (5) car lot noted at the north end of the Subject Property. If only the 30 parking spaces are provided, it would be at a parking ratio of 1.66 spaces per dwelling unit. If the Applicant were able to, for instance, accommodate two (2) App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 12 more parking spaces, it would be at a ratio of 1.78 spaces per dwelling unit. Refer to Image 3. Image 3. Submitted Site Plan for 6900 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard The Applicant will need to install sidewalk along the parking areas to allow for access to the sidewalks leading to each respective triplex building. This will require some of the proposed landscaping to be shifted elsewhere on the site (e.g. between buildings) and the landscape plan updated. City staff participated in a series of conversations with Hennepin County regarding the proposed drive access off Brooklyn Boulevard, as the long term goals of Brooklyn Boulevard have included the limiting of access and consolidation of driveway curb cuts, which is a County road. As part of the EDA acquisition of these properties, existing curb cuts were taken off line. The request from the Applicant is to install an access off Lee Avenue North and another access off Brooklyn Boulevard. The County has indicated that, due to the higher volumes of traffic along this segment of Brooklyn Boulevard (over 30,000 Average Daily Traffic), three lanes of traffic, and the proximity of the proposed drive access to other nearby intersections, they would like to see no access off Brooklyn Boulevard; however, if not possible, the County would approve installation of an emergency exit only (e.g. reinforced gate with bollards). As proposed, there would be an emergency right-out only with a lockable bollard. Pending any approval of the application, the Applicant and City will need to work with the App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 13 County to address the access needs. City staff was able to work with the Applicant to identify a location on-site that allows garbage to be picked up off Lee Avenue North near the main proposed entrance, rather than requiring a garbage truck to enter the site and navigate back out. The Subject Property is located in proximity to an existing bus stop located at the northwest corner of 69th Avenue North and Brooklyn Boulevard, just down the street and in front of Slim’s. Said transit stop serves local bus route 723, which offers direct connections to the Brooklyn Center Transit Center, North Hennepin Community College, and Starlite Transit Center in Brooklyn Park. Trash, Screening, and Lighting As mentioned above, City staff worked with the Applicant to identify a location for the proposed trash enclosure that would not require a garbage truck to navigate the site with the emergency exit in place. As proposed, the trash enclosure would be located just inside the main access to the site and would allow a garbage truck to pull straight in and back straight back out onto Lee Avenue North. Said trash enclosure shall be fully screened per City Code requirements with opaque front doors. Refer to Image 4 below. Image 4. Location of Trash Enclosure. Given the higher intensity residential use on the Subject Property in relation to the adjacent single family home to the southwest and across Lee Avenue North, the Applicant will be required to install a buffer. The Applicant has indicated installation of a fence along this portion of the Subject Property on their submitted site plan. Due to buffering provisions found in Section 35-410, which addresses the special requirements of medium and higher density multi-family residential districts (R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7 Districts), City staff is requesting installation of a minimum 6-foot opaque fence that is in harmony with the surrounding residential neighborhood and provides sufficient screening of the triplexes and specifically drive aisles and parking, from the adjacent single family home. A photometric/lighting plan was not provided as part of the submittal. Per the Zoning Code, “all exterior lighting shall be provided with lenses, reflectors, or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 14 property of the owner or operator of said illumination devices.” Additionally, glare shall not emanate from or be visible beyond the boundaries of the illuminated premises. Section 35-712 (Lighting) of the City Zoning Code further specifies that lighting shall not exceed ten (10) foot candles when measured at the property lines abutting the street right-of-way or non-residentially zoned properties or three (3) foot candles for residentially zoned properties. The Applicant should be cognizant to provide sufficient lighting for residents navigating the parking lot at night or accessing the trash enclosures, but minimize illumination levels and glare to single family residential properties abutting the Subject Property and located across Lee Avenue North. This might perhaps be achieved through pedestrian level lighting that can provide sufficient illumination for residents to navigate to their respective homes. Additionally, lighting should be provided for each exterior door. Landscaping The project submittal includes a detailed landscape plan, which illustrates the proposed planting schedule (i.e., trees, shrubs, annuals/perennials, mature size, planting size, root conditions). Although City Code does not have any specific requirements on landscaping, the City has operated under and held new and redeveloped areas to complying with the City’s adopted Landscape Point System policy, which assigns points to a given site based on the acreage of a development. The point system requires commercial sites to provide a specific amount or number of landscaping units, and is based on the maximum percentage of certain materials (i.e., 50% shade trees; 40% coniferous trees; 35% decorative trees; and 25% shrubs). Table 2. Landscape Point System Policy Calculations for Subject Property. Planting Type Minimum Size Points Per Planting Maximum Points (%) Points Accrued Shade Trees 2 ½” diameter 10 50% or 45 points (5 trees x 10 = 50) Coniferous Trees 5’ height 6 40% or 36 points (5 trees x 6 = 30) Decorative Trees 1” diameter 1.5 35% or 31.5 points (1 tree x 1.5 = 1.5) Shrubs 12” diameter 0.5 25% or 22.5 points (41 shrubs x 0.5 = 20.5) Total 100% (90 point min.) 97 points Assuming a Multi-Family Residential use, the Subject Property would need to provide a minimum of 90 points under the City’s Landscape Point System Policy. As provided, the Landscape Plan provides for 97 points, which is above and beyond the minimum requirements. City staff reviewed the proposed showy mountain ash tree, which is a decorative (or ornamental) tree, and found that it is native to the northern North American climates and does not appear to be susceptible to the Emerald Ash Borer, as it is not a “true” ash tree. Although not indicated on the submitted Landscape Plan and not counted in the Landscape Point System Policy, the Applicant should look for opportunities to plant perennial grasses or flowers along the triplex buildings, particularly along Brooklyn Boulevard and in-between buildings for curb appeal. The Applicant may need to evaluate whether there is sufficient spacing for the two proposed Prairie Statesman Swiss Stone Pines located in proximity to the trash enclosure off Lee Avenue North. In addition, the Applicant will need to relocate at least some of the proposed Techny Arborvitae proposed along the northernmost triplex and the Cupressina Norway Spruce on the Lee Avenue North side as App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 15 there will need to be a sidewalk connection between the proposed five space parking lot on the north end of the site to the triplexes, assuming access towards the rear of the buildings. All green areas on the site will be sodded except in areas where viable turf exists and is totally undisturbed by construction. The burden will be on the developer to prove at the time of a site inspection that the groundcover has been properly maintained and restored. The Planting Notes on the submitted Landscape Plan indicate that any existing boulevard trees would be fenced off and protected during construction. As noted in the Irrigation Notes on the submitted Landscape Plan, the contractor would be responsible for providing an irrigation layout plan to the City pending submittal of any building permits for the proposed project. Safety and Security The Applicant should work with the Brooklyn Center Police Department to identify opportunities to provide sufficient security measures for each of the proposed triplexes. In the cases of multi-family residential properties, the Zoning Code outlines special requirements under Section 35-410 (Special Requirements in R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7 Districts). Such requirements include the installation of an approved security system to control access within each multiple family building, such as locked building entrances or foyer doors, and locked doors leading from hallways to individual units. Dead-latch type locks shall be provided with lever or door knobs on the inside of building entrance doors that can be locked from the inside and outside. Engineering Review Andrew Hogg, Assistant City Engineer, reviewed plans and provided a memorandum and a redlined set of plans, dated August 4th, 2020 (Exhibit D). All engineering comments must be addressed prior to the issuance of any permits for land disturbing activity. It should be noted that an as-built survey will be required upon project completion, and inspection for the private site improvements is to be performed by the Applicant’s design/project engineer with certification required upon project completion. The Applicant will need to work with the City and County to obtain and address any and all requirements and permitting prior to beginning work, including a cross access agreement, and Utility Facilities Easement Agreement. The final plat shall be recorded at the County prior to issuance of any permits. The Applicant will be responsible for removing any remaining driveways and sidewalk adjacent to Brooklyn Boulevard and installation of a re-aligned sidewalk south towards Slim’s. As mentioned previously, the Applicant is responsible to provide a 10 foot boulevard with a 5 foot sidewalk and maintenance strip to accommodate this. The Applicant will also need to install sidewalk along the proposed parking lot off Lee Avenue North as well as a connection between the proposed five space parking lot and the triplexes. Fire Inspection/Building Review Building Official Dan Grinsteinner and Fire Inspector Brandon Gautsch reviewed the submitted plans. Per Dan Grinsteinner’s memo, dated August 4, 2020 (Exhibit E), the Applicant will need to submit for a SAC (Sewer Accessibility Charge) determination to the Metropolitan Council. No building permits shall be issued until any SAC charges are determined and paid for upon release of building permits. In addition, a City SAC/WAC (Water Accessibility Charge) fee will be due. App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 16 As the buildings are considered “Group R2,” the Applicant will need to provide for accessible units, and an accessible route shall be provided from any and all public transportation stops, accessible parking, accessible passenger loading zones, and public streets or sidewalks to any required accessible building entrances. Although each building is considered to be a “Group R2,” the buildings are not required to be sprinklered as they are under 4,500 square feet in size, so long as all Fire Code requirements relating to access are met, including a minimum 20 foot wide drive aisle. To that end, fire hydrants shall be provided in instances where they are not already in existence or in compliance with Fire Code. Based on the above noted findings and conditions above, City staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the requested site and building plan for the Subject Property located on what is currently known as 6921, 6927, 6933, and 6939 Brooklyn Boulevard, subject to the Applicant complying with the Conditions of Approval as noted below, and the receiving of approvals for the related preliminary and final plat and establishment of a Planned Unit Development. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Staff recommends the following conditions be attached to any positive recommendation on the approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2020-005 for the Subject Property located within the 6900 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard and comprised of Anticipated Permitting 1. The Applicant shall apply for and receive a City Land Disturbance permit prior to commencing any grading or land clearance activities on the site. 2. The Applicant shall obtain any required permits from Hennepin County for work in the County right-of-way. 3. The Applicant shall meet all requirements of the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission, including incorporation of water quality measures, as specified by the City. 4. The Applicant shall apply for and receive all applicable City building permits prior to commencing construction of any work. 5. Other permits not listed may be required and is the responsibility of the developer to obtain and warrant. 6. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of applicable building and land disturbance permits. 7. A preconstruction conference must be scheduled and held with City staff and other entities designated by the City. Plat Review 8. Approval of the preliminary and final plats are contingent upon the addressing of comments by Assistant City Engineer Hogg in his memorandum dated August 4, 2020. 9. Final plat and mylar shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Code of Ordinances (Platting). 10. Any comments and/or requirements as provided by Hennepin County. 11. Any comments and/or requirements from the City Attorney’s office, and specifically regarding an updated certified abstract of title. 12. The successful recording of said plat (mylar) with Hennepin County. App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 17 PUD / Site Plan Review 13. Any significant changes or modifications made to this request can only be made by an amendment to the approved Planned Unit Development as approved by the City Council. 14. The Applicant shall enter into a Purchase Agreement with the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center prior to the execution of the Final Plat. 15. The Applicant shall enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center prior to the execution of the Final Plat. 16. The Applicant shall enter into a Performance Agreement with supporting financial guarantee approved by the City shall be executed prior to the issuance of any permits. 17. The Applicant shall enter into a Construction Management Plan and Agreement and provide a separate deposit for any non-compliance. Engineering Review 18. The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer’s Review memorandum, dated August 4, 2020. a. Final grading, drainage, utility, and erosion control plans and any other site engineering related issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer for City site and building plan approval and prior to the issuance of permits. Fire Inspector/ Building Official Review 19. The Applicant shall work to ensure all applicable 2015 Minnesota Fire Code requirements have been met as part of any plan approval, including installation of a minimum 20-foot wide drive aisle. 20. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 21. The Applicant shall apply for a SAC determination from the Metropolitan Council. Said determination shall be forwarded to the City and paid for upon issuance of any City permits. 22. The Applicant shall work with the Building Official to address all minimum requirements for accessibility as they relate to units, parking, accessible routes, etc. The aforementioned comments are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Other guarantees and site development conditions may be further prescribed throughout the project as warranted and determined by the City. RECOMMENDATION The findings of fact, based on the staff’s review of the submitted plans support a recommendation for approval of the application. Based on the findings and the above-noted conditions of approval, staff recommends the following motion: Motion to approve a Resolution recommending the City Council approve Planning Commission Application No. 2020-005 for Preliminary and Final Plat, and site and building plan approvals, and the establishment of a Planned Unit Development for the Subject Property located in the 6900 block of Brooklyn Boulevard and known as 6921, 6927, 6933, and 6939 Brooklyn Boulevard, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, as amended by the conditions of approval in the resolution. App. No. 2020-005 PC 08/13/2020 Page 18 Attachments Exhibit A-Planning Application No. 2020-005 and documentation, submitted by C Alan Homes, LLC, and dated June 15, 2020 Exhibit B- Public Hearing Notice, dated June 25, 2020, as published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post, and updated Public Hearing Notice and one page informational flyer. Exhibit C- 60 Day Review Extension Letter, dated July 7, 2020. Exhibit D- Memorandum and Exhibits, prepared by Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg, and dated August 4, 2020. Exhibit E- Memorandum, prepared by Building Official Dan Grinsteinner, and dated August 4, 2020. o O I< L 'b \\ ,,,,...... '+ For Office Use Only · -"="• I -�-C..,._..E,....N �l'E.R .· I ·. ·. AT }HE t,E�TER Date Received: Date Application Complete: Letter of Completeness: PC App No. 2020 Planning Commission Application Applicant Information: Name: C Alan Homes Address:5215 Terraceview Ln N Plymouth MN 55446 Office Phone: ________________ Cell: 763-228-1785 Email: nationalchamp55442@yahoo.com FAX:------------------ Property Owner Information* (if different from Applicant): Name: Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center Property Owner Address: ________________________________ _ Office Phone: __________________ Cell: _________________ _ Email: FAX: ________________ _ Project Information: Provide a general description of your project and request(s): Construction of Six Tri Plex Units and Associated Site Improvements. Address/Location of Property: 6900 Brooklyn Blvd north Addresses. See attachment sheet Legal Description of Property: ------------------------------- ✓ Application Type (Mark all that Apply) Comprehensive Plan Amendment $1,050 Rezoning $1,050 Special/Interim Use Permit $250 Site and Building Plan Review $750 Planned Unit Development $1,800 Preliminary Plat $400 LW ' 1; ,;, � - ll I· • 1-.,. ll,; ,., Appeal Zoning Code Text Amendment Special/Interim Use Permit Amendment Variance Planned Unit Development Amendment ✓Final Plat $200 $500 $150 $200 $700 $200 IMPORTANT: All applications may be subject to additional fees for reimbursement of costs incurred by the City for filing, reviewing, and processing applications in the form of an escrow to the City. Application Fee: $3,150 Escrow Amount: $ 1000 Receipt No: 2020-005 06/15/2020 Exhibit A COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : Be n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C : \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 3 - 6 9 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 6 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 0 0 0 - C O V R . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1 : 1 P L O T D A T E : 7 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 1 9 P M BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200503 07/23/20 BJL C000 CIVIL COVER SHEET BJL BJL PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR PROJECT CONTACTS OWNER CURT BREKKE C. ALEN HOMES 5215 TERRACEVIEW LANE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 (612) 282-7546 OFFICE CIVIL ENGINEER BENJAMIN LUCAS, PE SOLUTION BLUE, INC. 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651)294-0038 OFFICE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES HAS BEEN DESIGNATED UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL 'C'. THESE QUALITY LEVELS WERE DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02. ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA". VICINITY MAP PROJECT LOCATIONS PROJECT LOCATION GENERAL SITE WORK NOTES 1. ALL STOCKPILES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OR DESIGNATED STAGING AREAS. 2. ALL CONTROL OF WATER AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE SEQUENCED, INSTALLED, AND MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 3. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS FOR THE PROJECT. SEE EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN AND NOTES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 4. ALL PUBLIC ROADWAYS AND PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS INSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL REMAIN OPEN FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHOWN IS BASED ON A SITE SURVEY PERFORMED BY W BROWN LAND SURVEYING IN 2020. GENERAL EARTHWORK NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF TREES/SHRUBS NOT MARKED FOR REMOVAL, INCLUDING MINIMIZING DISTURBANCE OF SOILS WITHIN THE TREES' DRIPLINE ZONES. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT STOCKPILE MATERIAL INSIDE THE TREE DRIPLINES. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES NOT BEING MARKED FOR REMOVAL. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL DEMOLITION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY WORK WITH OWNER. 4. NO CONCRETE OR RUBBLE SHALL BE BACKFILLED ONSITE. BURNING OF DEBRIS ON SITE SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. 6900 BROOKLYN BLVD TRI-PLEX DEVELOPMENTBROOKLYN CENTER, MN SITE, GRADING, DRAINAGE, EROSION CONTROL, AND UTILITIES FOR 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H SHEET INDEX SHEET NO.DESCRIPTION C000 CIVIL COVER SHEET C100 EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS C200 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS C210 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL - PHASE I C211 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL - PHASE II C300 CIVIL SITE PLAN C400 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C500 UTILITY PLAN C900 SITE DETAILS C901 UTILITY DETAILS C902 UTILITY DETAILS | | | | | | | | | 2.4 0. 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | REMOVE TREE (TYP.) CLEAR AND GRUBWOODED AREA DO NOT DISTURB NEIGHBORINGPROPERTIES DURING CLEARING &GRUBBING ACTIVITIES. CONTRACTORSHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE INFLICTEDTO NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. PROTECT POWERPOLE IN PLACE REMOVE 39 LF± CURB &GUTTER AND SAWCUTPAVEMENT 2' FROM CURB REMOVE & REPLACE 526 SF±PAVEMENT FOR UTILITYCONNECTION REMOVE 2,550 SF± SIDEWALK.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEPROTECTED ACCESSIBLEPEDESTRIAN ROUTE APPROVEDBY THE CITY DURING PUBLICSIDEWALK DISTURBANCE PROTECTELECTRICAL MHIN PLACE PROTECT POWERPOLE IN PLACE PROTECT POWERPOLE & GUY WIREIN PLACE PROTECT BORDERFENCE IN PLACE REMOVE 32 LF± CURB &GUTTER AND SAWCUTPAVEMENT 2' FROM CURB REMOVE 64 LF± CURB &GUTTER AND SAWCUTPAVEMENT 2' FROM CURB COORDINATE AND CONFIRMDEMOLITION LIMITS IN ROWWITH CITY BEFORESTARTING WORK PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : B e n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C : \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 3 - 6 9 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 6 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 1 0 0 - E C & R E M . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1 : 1 P L O T D A T E : 7 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 1 9 P M ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE SBI N Know what's below.before you dig.Call R BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200503 07/23/20 BJL C100 EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS BJL COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) GENERAL SITE DEMOLITION AND CLEARING NOTES: LEGEND EXISTING PROPERTY LINE REMOVALS LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR 802 800 CURB & GUTTER STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN | DRAINTILE GAS LINE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE SWALE SPOT ELEVATION FLARED END SECTION OUTLET 800.00 RIP RAP SIGN & BOLLARD ADA PAVEMENT MARKING BUILDING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC FLARED END SECTION INLET CO LIGHT POLE SOIL BORINGS PARKING STALL COUNT CURB AND GUTTER REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BUILDING REMOVAL SAWCUT REMOVE PIPE TREE PROTECTION REMOVAL REMOVAL CONCRETE REMOVAL BJL 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : B e n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C : \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 3 - 6 9 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 6 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 2 0 0 - E R O S . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1 : 1 P L O T D A T E : 7 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 0 P M BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200503 07/23/20 BJL C200 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS BJL COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N BJL 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES: EROSION CONTROL EROS-01 EROSION CONTROL EROS-02 EROSION CONTROL 6" MINIMUM DEPTH EROS-06 EROSION CONTROL EROS-07 EROSION CONTROL EROS-08 EROSION CONTROL EROS-16 EROSION CONTROL EROS-22 EROSION CONTROL EROS-29 | | | | | | | | | 4.0 2.4 0. 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | CB INSERT TREE PROTECTIONRING CB INSERT CB INSERT SF SF SF SF S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F S F COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : B e n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C : \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 3 - 6 9 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 6 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 2 0 0 - E R O S . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1 : 1 P L O T D A T E : 7 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 0 P M ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE SBI N Know what's below.before you dig.Call R BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200503 07/23/20 BJL C210 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL - PHASE I BJL LEGEND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR 802 800 802 800 CURB & GUTTER STORM SEWER DRAINTILE SWALE FLARED END SECTION OUTLET RIP RAP CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INLET PROTECTION BUILDING FLARED END SECTION INLET GUTTER OUT CURB SILT FENCE SF SOIL BORINGS DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW BIO-ROLL ITEM SILT FENCE UNIT LINEAR FEET QUANTITY 552 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SQUARE FEET XXX CONSTRUCTION ROCK ENTRANCE EACH 1 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE EACH 3 TREE PROTECTION RING EACH 1 PHASE I EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES BIO LOG LINEAR FEET 370 BJL 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H | | | | | | | | | 2.4 0. 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | 868 | CO | CO | CO | | | | | | | CO -4.5% -5.0% -4.8% -4.3% -4.9% -2.5% -1.2% -1.3% -0.9% -0.9% -2.6% 866 86 5 867 867 868 868 868 868 // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // //// // // // // // // // CB INSERT TREE PROTECTIONRING CB INSERT CB INSERT CB INSERT CB INSERT SF S F S F S F S F S F S F S F PERIMETER CONTROL CAN BEREMOVED ONCE PROPERTY FENCEIS INSTALLED AND PERMANENTCOVER IS ESTABLISHED PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : B e n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C : \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 3 - 6 9 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 6 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 2 0 0 - E R O S . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1 : 1 P L O T D A T E : 7 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 0 P M ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE SBI N Know what's below.before you dig.Call R BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200503 07/23/20 BJL C211 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL - PHASE II BJL COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) LEGEND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR 802 800 802 800 CURB & GUTTER STORM SEWER DRAINTILE SWALE WETLAND FLARED END SECTION OUTLET RIP RAP CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INLET PROTECTION BUILDING FLARED END SECTION INLET GUTTER OUT CURB SILT FENCE SF SOIL BORINGS DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW BIO-ROLL ITEM SILT FENCE UNIT LINEAR FEET QUANTITY 450 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SQUARE FEET XXX CONSTRUCTION ROCK ENTRANCE EACH 1 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE EACH 5 TREE PROTECTION RING EACH 1 PHASE 2 EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES BIO LOG LINEAR FEET 480 BJL 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H PAVEMENT AREA 0.25 AC BUILDING AREA 7,050 SF SEEDING AREA 0.38 AC PRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS 0.00 AC POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS 0.55 AC AREA SUMMARY DISTURBED AREA 0.98 AC | | | | | | | | | 2.4 0. 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | CO CO CO CO // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // //// // // // // // // // REMOVE AND REPLACE LEEAVE PAVEMENT SECTION INKIND FOR UTILITY WORK 10' BOULEVARD AND5' SIDEWALK INPUBLIC ROW TO BECONSTRUCTED BYOTHERS EMERGENCY EXITONLY SIGNAGE DO NOT ENTERSIGNAGE PROPERTY FENCE TOBE INSTALLED ALONGPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY FENCE TOBE INSTALLED ALONGPROPERTY LINE SEE REINFORCEDCONCRETE SECTIONFOR TRASH PAD SEE TRASHENCLOSURE DETAILON SHEET C900 LOCKABLE BOLLARDSFOR EMERGENCYVEHICLE TRAFFIC ONLY COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : B e n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C : \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 3 - 6 9 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 6 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 3 0 0 - S I T E . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1 : 1 P L O T D A T E : 7 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 0 P M ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE SBI N Know what's below.before you dig.Call R BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200503 07/23/20 BJL C300 CIVIL SITE PLAN BJL LEGEND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CURB & GUTTER SWALE SIGN & BOLLARD ADA PAVEMENT MARKING STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE PAVING BUILDING LIGHT POLE SOIL BORINGS PARKING STALL COUNT GENERAL GEOMETRIC AND PAVING NOTES: SIGNAGE AND MARKING NOTES: SITE DATA BJL 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H | | | | | | | | | 2.4 0. 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | 868 | CO | CO | CO | | | | | | | CO -4.5% -5.0% -4.8% -4.3% -4.9% -2.5% -1.2% -1.3% -0.9% -0.9% -2.6% 866.91 866.83 866.33 866.41 866.41 866.91 867.46 866.96867.46 866.96 867.38 866.88 867.41 866.67 866.54 867.32 866.76 866.02 865.53 867.52 867.63 867.13 867.20 867.70 867.70 867.20 867.80 867.30 867.30 867.22 867.72 867.80 867.58 866.93 867.16 867.55 867.21867.21867.19 867.21 867.35867.38 867.65 867.86 867.36 867.44 867.94 867.94 867.44 867.61 867.61 867.53 867.03 867.11 867.11 867.37 867.09 866.47 867.40 866.97 866.70 865.02 864.30MA 864.25± MA 864.50± MA 865.50± 866.64 MA 866.76± MA 867.00± 866.88 MA 864.82± MA 865.1± MA 867.66± MA 867.73± MA 867.70± MA 867.66± MA 867.27± MA 866.76± 866 86 5 867 867 868 868 868 868 // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // //// // // // // // // // CB 02RE: 867.66IE: 862.93 2 1 7 L F 1 2 " S T M @ 1 . 5 % CONNECT TO EX STM CBIE: 859.50±FIELD VERIFY PIPE INVERT A B A B A B A B A B A B 12 LF 12" STM @ 1.5% CBMH 01RE: 867.20IE: 859.67 B B COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : B e n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C : \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 3 - 6 9 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 6 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 4 0 0 - G R A D . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1 : 1 P L O T D A T E : 7 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 1 P M ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE SBI N Know what's below.before you dig.Call R BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200503 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T 07/23/20 BJL C400 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN BJL LEGEND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR 802 800 802 800 CURB & GUTTER STORM SEWER DRAINTILE SWALE SPOT ELEVATION DRAINAGE SLOPE FLARED END SECTION OUTLET 1.0%800.00800.00 RIP RAP BUILDING FLARED END SECTION INLET GUTTER OUT CURB EOFEMERGENCY OVERFLOW SOIL BORINGS 800.00 BJL 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H GENERAL GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES: KEY NOTES: | | | | | | | | | 2.4 0. 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | CO | CO | CO | | | | | | | CO // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // //// // // // // // // // SAN MH 01RE: 867.47IE: 856.31 (NE)OE: 856.21 (W) 2" SAN SERVIE: 859.015' FROM HOUSE (TYP.) 2" WM SERVIE: 859.115' FROM HOUSE (TYP.) SAN CO 03RE: 866.97IE: 858.85 (NW)IE: 858.97 (SE)OE: 858.75 (SW) 8 LF 2" SAN SERV @ 2.0%5' FROM HOUSE 2" GV 8" x 2" TEE &8" 45° BEND CONNECT TO EX.SAN MHIE: 855.98±FIELD VERIFY INVERT 42 LF 2 " S A N @ 3 . 1 % 61 LF 2 " W M S E R V 1 9 2 L F 8 " S A N @ 0 . 5 % 8 " D I P W M WET TAP INTOEXISTING WATER MAIN 8" GV SAN CO 04RE: 867.59IE: 859.59 (NW)IE: 859.55 (SE)OE: 859.45 (SW) SAN CO 06RE: 867.87IE: 859.87 (NW)IE: 859.83 (SE)OE: 859.73 (SW) 2 LF 2" SAN SERV @ 2.0%5' FROM HOUSE 2" SAN SERVIE: 859.675' FROM HOUSE (TYP.) 4 LF 2" SAN SERV @ 2.0%5' FROM HOUSE 6 LF 2" SAN SERV @ 2.0%5' FROM HOUSE 2" SAN SERVIE: 859.055' FROM HOUSE (TYP.) 4 LF 2" SAN SERV @ 2.0%5' FROM HOUSE 6 LF 2" SAN SERV @ 2.0%5' FROM HOUSE 2" WM SERVIE: 859.775' FROM HOUSE (TYP.) 2" WM SERVIE: 860.055' FROM HOUSE (TYP.) 63 LF 2 " W M S E R V 63 LF 2 " W M S E R V 76 LF 2 " S A N @ 3 . 5 % 76 LF 2 " S A N @ 3 . 1 % 2" 45° BEND 2" GV 8" x 2" TEE 2" GV 8" x 2" TEE SAN MH 05RE: 867.43IE: 857.37 (NE)OE: 857.27 (NW) WYEIE: 856.77 SAN CO 02RE: 867.90IE: 857.47 (NE)OE: 857.37 (SW) 35 LF 2" SAN@ 3.1% 27 LF 8" SAN@ 0.9% COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N BENCHMARKS (BM) PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : B e n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C : \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 3 - 6 9 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 6 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 5 0 0 - U T I L . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1 : 1 P L O T D A T E : 7 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 1 P M ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE SBI N Know what's below.before you dig.Call R BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200503 07/23/20 BJL C500 UTILITY PLAN BJL LEGEND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CURB & GUTTER STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN || DRAINTILE GAS LINE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE SWALE FLARED END SECTION OUTLET RIP RAP BUILDING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC FLARED END SECTION INLET CO CO LIGHT POLE EOFEMERGENCY OVERFLOW SOIL BORINGS ELEV BJL 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : B e n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C : \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 3 - 6 9 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 6 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 9 0 0 - D E T L . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1 : 1 P L O T D A T E : 7 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 1 P M BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200503 07/23/20 BJL C900 SITE DETAILS BJL BJL 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H CIVIL SITE SITE-01 HEAVY DUTY (TRUCK ROUTE) NORMAL DUTY CIVIL SITE SITE-04 REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CIVIL SITE SITE-05 SITE-16 CIVIL SITE SITE-17 CIVIL SITE OUTFALL CURB & GUTTER INFALL CURB & GUTTER SITE-30 CIVIL SITE SECTION A-A A ISOMETRIC A SITE-33 CIVIL SITE SITE-31 CIVIL SITE EXPAN S I O N JOINT EXPAN S I O N JOINT SITE-37 CIVIL SITE PERSPECTIVE ADA-06 ACCESSIBLITY REQUIRED VEHICLE ID PARKING FOR VIOLATION UP TO $200 FINE VAN ACCESSIBLE SITE-51 CIVIL SITE COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : B e n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C : \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 3 - 6 9 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 6 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 9 0 0 - D E T L . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1 : 1 P L O T D A T E : 7 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 1 P M BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200503 07/23/20 BJL C901 UTILITY DETAILS BJL BJL 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H SANITARY SEWER SAN-01 SECTION PLAN SANITARY SEWER SAN-09 SANITARY SEWER SAN-10 SANITARY SEWER SAN-11 SANITARY SEWER SAN-14 SANITARY SEWER SAN-16 WATER MAIN WAT-03 WATER MAIN WAT-04 WATER MAIN WAT-05 WATER MAIN WAT-06 WATER MAIN WAT-09 WATER MAIN WAT-13 COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION XX/XX/2019 XXXX # XX DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N PRELIMINARY CA D D U S E R : B e n j a m i n L u c a s F I L E : C : \ U S E R S \ B L U C A S \ D R O P B O X \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 0 5 0 3 - 6 9 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D 6 U N I T S - C A L L E N H O M E S \ W O R K I N G F I L E S \ C A D \ D W G \ P L A N S H E E T S \ C 9 0 0 - D E T L . D W G P L O T S C A L E : 1 : 1 P L O T D A T E : 7 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2 : 2 1 P M BENJAMIN LUCAS XX.XX.2020 54265 200503 07/23/20 BJL C902 UTILITY DETAILS BJL BJL 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 69 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H STORM SEWER STM-03 STORM SEWER STM-04 STORM SEWER STM-05 STORM SEWER STM-08 STORM SEWER STM-12 STORM SEWER STM-18 B A B A 1 4 RIPRAP AT RCP OUTLETS CLASS II d50=6" CLASS III d50=9" CLASS IV d50=12" DIA. ROUND PIPE (IN.)L (FT.) 12" DEPTH RIPRAP (CU.YD.) 18" DEPTH RIPRAP (CU.YD.) 24" DEPTH RIPRAP (CU.YD.) 12 8 1.3 2.1 2.6 15 8 1.7 2.9 3.5 18 10 2.2 3.6 4.4 21 10 2.8 4.6 5.6 24 12 3.5 5.8 6.9 27 12 4.1 6.9 8.3 30 14 5.0 8.3 9.9 36 16 6.6 11.0 13.2 42 18 8.2 13.6 16.4 48 20 10.1 16.8 20.1 STORM SEWER STM-19 Scale:01 1/16" = 1' LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN EV-2 01 EV-1 04 SH-1 03 OR-1 01 L100 PLANTING PLAN NOTE: 1. ONLY PLANTS THAT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CITY'S POINT SYSTEM ARE SHOWN IN THIS PLAN. 2. THIS LAYOUT SHOULD EQUATE TO 102 POINTS, EXCEEDING THE REQUIRED 90 POINTS. EV-3 02 ST-1 01 SH-1 03 SH-1 03 SH-1 03 SH-1 03 SH-1 03 EV-1 03 EV-1 03 ST-2 01 EV-1 03 ST-3 03 EV-1 03 ST-1 03 EV-1 03 ST-2 03 EV-1 04 EV-3 02 PEBL PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION 07/27/20 PRELIM LANDSCAPE # 01 DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N PRELIM JONATHAN BLASEG 07.27.2020 56714 2023 07/23/20 JB JB JB 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H PEBL DESIGN 3243 Winpark Drive New Hope, MN 55427 t: 763.544.8002 www.pebl.design TREE, REFER TO PLANTING PLAN FOR SPECIES, SIZE AND LOCATION DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE (3) PER TREE @ 120 DEGREE INTERVALS, TYPICAL 8' STEEL STAKE DOUBLE SHREDDED HW MULCH @ 3" DEPTH. DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH ROOT FLARE 2"x2" WOOD STAKE SET AT ANGLE PREPARED PLANTING SOIL ROOT BALL, REMOVE CAGE AND PULL BACK TOP 13 OF BURLAP AND TWINE SUBGRADE EDGE CONDITION VARIES NOTE: TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE ILLUSTRATED: IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING 2 x DIA. OF BALL MIN. FLAGGING, 1 PER WIRE 2 x DIA. OF BALL MIN. SHRUB, REFER TO PLANTING PLAN FOR SPECIES, SIZE AND LOCATION SUBGRADE EDGE CONDITION VARIES PREPARED PLANTING SOIL NOTE: HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL, SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTING PIT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION DOUBLE SHREDDED HW MULCH @ 3" DEPTH. DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH SHRUB STEM PRIMARY EDGE OF PLANTING BED SE C O N D A R Y E D G E O F P L A N T I N G B E D D DD D 12 D 12 D PERENNIAL OR GRASS, REFER TO PLANTING PLAN FOR SPECIES, SIZE AND LOCATION SUBGRADE EDGE CONDITION VARIES PREPARED PLANTING SOIL NOTE: HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL AND REMOVE ALL WIRE, PLASTIC, TAGS AND/OR SYNTHETIC MATERIAL FROM PLANTS PRIOR TO PLANTING D= TYPICAL ON CENTER (O.C.) SPACING AS INDICATED IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE DOUBLE SHREDDED HW MULCH @ 3" DEPTH. DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH PLANT STEM PLANT CENTER, TYPICAL 12 " M I N Scale:01 NTS PLANTING DETAIL: TREE Scale:02 NTS PLANTING DETAIL: SHRUBS Scale:03 NTS PLANTING DETAIL: FORB/GRS GENERAL NOTES 1. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR GRADING, UTILITIES, EROSION CONTROL, HARDCOVER/PARKING LAYOUT, PROJECT EXTENTS/ BOUNDARIES AND DISTURBED SOIL RESTORATION AREAS. 2. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLAN LAYOUT AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN OR INTENT OF THE LAYOUT. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK AND MATERIALS SUPPLIED. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, WALKWAYS, TREES, LAWNS, AND OTHER SITE FEATURES DESIGNATED TO REMAIN DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. 9. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. 10. EXISTING CONTOURS, PAVEMENT, VEGETATION, UTILITIES AND OTHER FEATURES ARE BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE FOR DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT MATERIAL SELECTIONS AND OTHER SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR WARRANTY. UNDESIRABLE PLANT MATERIAL SELECTIONS OR SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. 12. ALL PLANTING BEDS NOT CONTAINED BY STRUCTURES, CURB OR PAVING MUST BE EDGED WITH COMMERCIAL GRADE STEEL EDGING (5" H x 3 16"). 13. ALL EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED AND PROTECTED (SEE L000) (EXISTING TREES ARE DRAWN AT NORMAL MATURE CROWN DIAMETER AND THIS DOES NOT REFLECT EXISTING CROWN SIZES, SEE SURVEY). PLANTING NOTES 1. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED HEIGHT. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO 'V' CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' FEET ABOVE THE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGING BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6' FEET ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 2. EXISTING BLVD TREES TO BE FENCED OFF AND PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION 3. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE WARRANTIED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER OWNER/ARCHITECT'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO THE ARCHITECT'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 4. NO PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA 5. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL FOR ALL TURF AND SEEDED AREAS. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF 1/3 TOPSOIL, 1/3 SAND, AND 1/3 COMPOST IN ALL SHRUB AND PERENNIAL BEDS. 6. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE STAKED AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND/OR AS DIRECTED IN THE FIELD BY THE ARCHITECT. THE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE ALL STAKING LOCATIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING. 7. ALL PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS. 8. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES FROM THE GROUND TO THE FIRST BRANCH. WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE QUALITY, HEAVY WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO DECEMBER 1ST AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER MAY 1ST. 9. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED (COMMON OR LATIN NOMENCLATURE) WITH A PLASTIC TAG WHICH SHALL NOT BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL. 10. APPLY PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR APPROVED EQ) IN ALL PLANTING BEDS FOLLOWED BY 3" OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TOPPING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 11. ALL SEEDED AREAS AND PLANTINGS WITHIN THE PROJECT SCOPE MUST BE IRRIGATED OR WATERED VIA TEMPORARY HOSE BIBS THROUGH THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD. TURF/SOD NOTES 1. SOD ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND GRADING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 2. WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB ETC. 3. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DRAINAGE SWALES, SOD SHALL BE STAKED SECURELY. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER SOD THOROUGHLY IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION. THEN WATER SOD DAILY FOR THE FIRST 30 DAYS FOLLOWING INTALLATION. IRRIGATION NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN SPECIFICATIONS AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR INSTALLATION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT SODDED/SEED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. 2. SHRUBS AND PERENNIAL BEDS TO BE IRRIGATED WITH DRIP IRRIGATION. SOD TO BE IRRIGATED WITH SPRAY. RAIN GARDENS NOT TO BE IRRIGATED. 3. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A WATERING/LAWN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIALS GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. 4. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT SOIL CONDITIONS AND COMPACTION ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AROUND THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. UNDESIRABLE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE PROPER SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE IN ALL PLANTING AREAS. 5. COORDINATE IRRIGATION SLEEVING LOCATIONS WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 6. RAIN SENSORS TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE IRRIGATION DESIGN. 7. IRRIGATION LIMITS TO EXTEND TO STREET BACK OF CURB. IRRIGATION SHALL NOT OVER SPRAY PUBLIC SIDEWALKS OR PAVED SURFACES. L200 PLANTING DETAILS PEBL PROJECT NO: REVISION HISTORY DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:REG. NO. CERTIFICATION 07/27/20 PRELIM LANDSCAPE # 01 DESIGNED: REVIEWED: PHASE: SUMMARY DRAWN: INITIAL ISSUE: NOT F O R CONS T R U C T I O N PRELIM JONATHAN BLASEG 07.27.2020 56714 2023 07/23/20 JB JB JB 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 60 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D T R I - P L E X DE V E L O P M E N T C. A L E N H O M E S 52 1 5 T E R R A C E V I E W L A N E N O R T H PEBL DESIGN 3243 Winpark Drive New Hope, MN 55427 t: 763.544.8002 www.pebl.design Exhibit B City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3300 | www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please take notice that the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center will hold an on-line public hearing on Thursday, August 13, 2020, at approximately 7:00 p.m. Meeting materials can be accessed by visiting the City of Brooklyn Center’s website at: https://www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org/index.aspx?NID=255. A definite time for this application to be considered cannot be given as it will depend on the progression of the agenda items. This public hearing was originally scheduled for July 9, 2020; however, the public hearing was continued to allow additional time to address necessary easements along Brooklyn Boulevard and access off Brooklyn Boulevard. TYPE OF REQUEST: Establishment of a Planned Unit Development, Site and Building Plan, and Preliminary and Final Plat Approvals PETITIONER: C Alan Homes PROPERTY OWNER: Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6921, 6927, 6933, and 6939 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 PROPERTY ID: 27-119-21-33-0014, 27-119-21-33-0013, 27-119-21-33-0012, and 27-119-21-33-0011 BRIEF STATEMENT OF CONTENTS OF PETITION: Consideration of requests that would allow for four EDA- owned lots to be developed into six triplexes and associated site improvements. As City Hall is currently closed to the public due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we strongly encourage you to forward your comments and questions to gmcintosh@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us up until noon on the day of the meeting, or contact Ginny McIntosh at (763) 569-3319. Your comments will be included in the record and addressed as part of the meeting. Alternatively, you may participate in the Planning Commission meeting via Webex at: logis.webex.com Meeting Number (Access Code): 141 666 5172 Password: BCPC08132020Mtng By Phone: 1 (312) 535-8110 (Enter Access Code) Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the City Clerk at (763) 569-3300 to make arrangements. Respectfully, Ginny McIntosh City Planner/Zoning Administrator B r o o k l y n B o u l e v a r d 69th Avenue North Le e A v e n u e N o r t h Ma j o r A v e n u e N o r t h 70th Avenue North Ky l e A v e n u e N o r t h B r o o k l y n B o u l e v a r d 70th Avenue North C Alan Homes Triplex Project (6900 Block of Brooklyn Blvd) Applicant: C Alan Homes Request: Establishment of a Planned Unit Development, Site and Building Plan, and Preliminary and Final Plat Approvals PROPOSED BROOKLYN BOULEVARD TRIPLEXES A series of new triplexes along Brooklyn Boulevard are being proposed for construction by C. Alan Homes (https://www.c-alanhomes.com/), a Minnesota based home design and construction company. Triplexes in each of the two locations will be arranged in a row and face the Boulevard. • Two locations totaling 39 new residential units, each proposed to have three bedrooms • Pedestrian access directly onto Brooklyn Boulevard and parking in the rear • Rents are estimated at $1850-$2200 per three-bedroom unit • 20% of the units will be Section 8 eligible 6900 Brooklyn Blvd (north of Slim’s) • .98 Acres • 6 buildings proposed • 18 total units • Each unit approx 1295 sq ft 6000 Brooklyn Blvd (south of the Sanctuary at Brooklyn Center) • 1.65 Acres • 7 buildings proposed • 21 total units • Each unit approx 1295 sq ft PROJECT LOCATIONS CO N T A C T Ginny McIntosh City Planner and Zoning Administrator City of Brooklyn Center 763.569.3319 gmcintosh@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us Renderings courtesy of C. Alan Homes LLC VIRTUAL PUBLIC HEARING Brooklyn Center Planning Commission Meeting Thursday, August 13th 7:00PM Visit https://www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org/ index.aspx?NID=255 July 7, 2020 C Alan Homes Attn: Terry Robertson and Curt Brekke 5215 Terraceview Ln N Plymouth, MN 55446 RE: City of Brooklyn Center, MN Planning Commission Application No. 2020-005 Request for Establishment of a Planned Unit Development, Site and Building Plan, Preliminary and Final Plat Approvals for the 6900 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard Mr. Robertson and Mr. Brekke, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Brooklyn Center is required to approve or deny a written request for certain land use actions within sixty (60) days from receipt of an application. Community Development Department records indicate the City received the above-referenced application and documentation on June 15, 2020, which means the City’s 60-day time limit would expire on August 14, 2020. By allowances granted under Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, Subd. 3(f), the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby providing official notice that the review period has been extended an additional sixty (60) days to allow the time necessary for City staff to prepare a resolution, including proposed conditions of approval, for review and action by City Council. The new deadline for completing the review and final action on this application is now October 13, 2020. As the public hearing has already been published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post for the July 9, 2020 Planning Commission meeting, the intent is to table the public hearing to provide sufficient time for you, the Applicant, to reconcile any adjustments to the site plan as relating to the additional easements necessary and determine the ability for driveway access off Brooklyn Boulevard from Hennepin County. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at (763) 569-3319 or email gmcintosh@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us. Sincerely, Ginny McIntosh City Planner and Zoning Administrator Exhibit C M E M O R A N D U M DATE: August 17, 2020 TO: Ginny McIntosh, City Planner/Zoning Administrator FROM: Andrew Hogg, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Preliminary Site Plan & Plat Review – Brooklyn Boulevard 6900 Brooklyn Blvd Tri-plexes (Revised) Public Works staff reviewed the following documents submitted for review for the proposed 6900 Brooklyn Blvd Tri-plexes (Planning Commission Application No. 2020-005): Preliminary Plans and plat submitted 07/23/2020 Subject to final staff Site Plan approval, the referenced plans must be revised in accordance with the following comments/revisions and approved prior to issuance of Land Alteration permit. C000 Title Sheet 1. No comments. C100 Removals Plan 2. Right of Way along Brooklyn Blvd is owned by Hennepin County. Obtain necessary permits prior to work with in Hennepin County Right of Way. 3.Removal for utility connections in street shall extent curb to curb or to drive lane, no partial width removals. 4.Remove driveways and existing sidewalk adjacent to Brooklyn Blvd. 5. Protect existing bus stop sign along Brooklyn Blvd. Coordinate with Metro Transit to maintain bus service. 6. Remove existing service stubs to back of curb. 7.Missing existing street light in front of Lot 2, review/adjust location as required. C200, 202 and 202 – SWPPP Plans 8. Silt fence line type is hidden under property line type. C210 and 211 – Erosion Control Plans 9. No comments. C300 – Site Plan 10.Overall some of the linetypes/thickness makes text hard to read. 11.Site triangles at entrance/exits of development shall be free and clear of any obstructions. 12.Use City Detail for City driveway aprons. 13. Developer to provide 10’ boulevard with a 5’sidewalk and maintenance strip, matching the properties to the north and south. Review site ensure grades and site feature still fit. 14. Install signage to discourage residents/guest from trying to access Brooklyn Blvd. 15.Verify clearance from curb to existing street light at south exit. 16. Provide parallel sidewalk along back side of new curb if possible 17. Add sidewalk to proposed parking stalls along Lee. 18.All utilities to be within a drainage & utility easement. 19. Add No Right Turn sign on Brooklyn Blvd for south emergency access. 20. Show location of ADA stalls & access routes. Exhibit D PC Review Memo (Revised), August 17, 2020 21. Only 30 stalls shown on plans for 18 units (1.7/unit) – should provide 2.5 stalls per unit 22. 18’ wide drive lane is inadequate for 2-way traffic or meeting fire code. Work with Fire Inspector and Planning to establish lane width. Minimum fire access lane width is 20’ per code 23. Add bollards to west end of access lane and sign to prevent traffic from heading down dead end. C400 – Grading and Drainage Plan 24. All city roadway embankment material installed within pavement patching areas of existing roadways shall be placed in lifts not to exceed 8-inches and compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of maximum density regardless of depth below the final pavement surface. The Engineer shall take a minimum of three (3) compaction tests at varying elevations within the pavement patch area. 25. Applicant will coordinate with Hennepin County for road embankment material installed within Brooklyn Blvd Right of Way. 26. Storm sewer to be privately owned & maintained. 27. Incorporate permanent water quality BMP’s. 28. No catch basin manhole on Lee at location shown – install new catch basin manhole. 29. Can storm sewer be installed without encroaching on adjacent property? 30. Review SW corner of access drive for slopes & drainage. 31. Provide 1.0% minimum slope on bituminous pavement. 32. Add missing spot elevations. C500 – Utility Plan 33. 8” watermain to be looped out to Brooklyn Blvd. 34. Provide separate service line to each bldg. or provide joint maintenance agreements for service lines. 35. They don’t make 2” DIP, adjust notes accordingly. 36. Existing watermain on Lee Ave is 6”, adjust wet tap note accordingly. 37. All on-site utility lines to be privately owned and maintained. 38. Verify water service sizes. 39. Provide on-site fire hydrant. 40. No sanitary sewer manhole on Lee at location shown – install new manhole. 41. Minimum sanitary sewer service pipe size to be 4”. C900, 901, 902 and 903 – Details 42. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities must conform to the City standard specifications and details. The City’s standard details must be included in the plan. 43. Update to use current City plates. Preliminary Plat/Final 44. Drainage & Utility easements shall be adjusted to cover all shared/common utility lines (sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer) along with any storm water management features. 45. City & County will review permanent rights of way and easement needs along Brooklyn Blvd (Plats to be reviewed by Hennepin County Engineer). 46. Provide required separate cross access/cross parking easements. 47. Provide required separate trail & sidewalk easements. PC Review Memo (Revised), August 17, 2020 48. Change Bloomington to Brooklyn Center in signature areas. 49. It appears that all property is Torrens, adjust Document block and signature blocks accordingly 50. Need working copy of the preliminary plat to show all vacated easements, proposed easements, existing and proposed utilities and provide all easement documents for the City for review. A 10’ drainage and utility easement must be dedicated on the plat around the entire perimeter of the site. An additional utility easement must be dedicated on the plat for the private water main and sanitary to allow for maintenance access per the Developers Agreement. 51. Legal descriptions and easement vacation documents must be obtained for all existing easements. Existing public easements as determined by the City must be vacated, and proposed easements must be dedicated as part of the preliminary and final platting process. The formal vacation document must contain an easement vacation description and depiction exhibit signed by a professional surveyor. 52. An updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Planner and City Attorney for review at the time of the preliminary plat application (within 30 days of preliminary plat application). Additionally, this will need to stay current and be updated through the approval process as required to maintain and be current within 30 days of the release of final plat. 53. The applicant is responsible for coordinating site development plans with Xcel Energy, CenterPoint Energy, Qwest Communications and other private utility companies. Any further easements necessary to provide utility service to the proposed site development shall be dedicated to the public for public use with the final plat. Miscellaneous 54. See redlines for additional site plan comments. 55. Provide landscape and irrigation plan. 56. Upon project completion, the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures; and provide certified record drawings of all project plan sheets depicting any associated private and/or public improvements, revisions and adjustments prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The as-built survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project as determined and directed by the City Engineer. 57. Inspection for the private site improvements must be performed by the developer’s design/project engineer. Upon project completion, the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer’s immediate and direct supervision.(see attached template letter) The engineer must be certified in the State of Minnesota and must certify all required as-built drawings (which are separate from the as-built survey). 58. The total disturbed area is less than one acre; an NPDES permit is not required. In addition, the total disturbed area is less than 1 acre, per Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission rules, the applicant should incorporate water quality measures. 59. Provide traffic memo highlighting a review sight lines and site distances for exiting the site. Documenting the anticipated traffic generated by the proposed site and a discussion on the parking needs on a daily use and for guest parking for events and holidays. PC Review Memo (Revised), August 17, 2020 60. The City has submitted the plans to Hennepin County for review. Applicant must meet requirements from Hennepin County’s review. Prior to issuance of a Land Alteration 61. Final construction/demolition plans and specifications need to be received and approved by the City Engineer in form and format as determined by the City. The final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan and/or as amended by the City Engineer. 62. A letter of credit or a cash escrow in the amount of 100% of the estimated cost as determined by City staff shall be deposited with the City. 63. During construction of the site improvements, and until the permanent turf and plantings are established, the developer will be required to reimburse the City for the administration and engineering inspection efforts. Please submit a deposit of $2,500 that the City can draw upon on a monthly basis. 64. A construction management plan and agreement is required that addresses general construction activities and management provisions, traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions, tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions, definition of responsibilit y p rovisions, temporary parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non-compliance provisions. A separate $2,500 deposit will be required as part of the non-compliance provision. Anticipated Permitting: 65. A City of Brooklyn Center Land Disturbance Permit is required. 66. Applicant to obtain required permits to work in County right-of-way. 67. Other permits not listed may be required and is the responsibility of the developer to obtain and warrant. 68. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of applicable building and land disturbance permits. 69. A preconstruction conference must be scheduled and held with City staff and other entities designated by the City. The aforementioned comments are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Other guarantees and site development conditions may be further prescribed throughout the project as warranted and determined by the City. City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3300 | www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org Community Development 763-569-3330 Direct August 4, 2020 C Alan Homes Development Building/Fire comments Upon review of documents provided for the development of multi-family dwelling units located at 6000 Brooklyn Blvd & 6900 Brooklyn Blvd. Items that are listed below need to be addressed: 1)A SAC determination shall be provided by MET Council with a determination letter presented to the Building Department prior to permit issuance. 2)City SAC /WAC fee is based on a determination of MET Council. If any MET Council SAC fee is applied to a structure. City SAC/WAC is applied on the Sewer and Water permit application as per Fee table located on back. Multi-family “Less than 5 acres” $4500 per multi-family structure in addition to state surcharge. 3)The buildings are considered a group R2. Per Chapter 11 and ICC ANSI A117.1-2009 with MN Amendments 1107.6.2.2.1. In Group R2 occupancies containing more than seven (7) dwelling units, at least 2 percent but not less than one of the units shall be a Type A unit. All group R2 units within a contiguous parcel of land development, irrespective of lot lines and public rights-of-way within the development, shall be considered to determine the total number of units and the required number of Type A units. a.Each development shall be provided with (1) Type A unit. b.The remaining units are NOT required to be Type B units as there is not (4) four or more dwelling units in a single structure per Chapter 11 and ICC ANSI A117.1-2009 with MN Amendments 1107.6.2.2.2. 4)At least (1) one accessible route within the site shall be provided from public transportation stops, accessible parking, accessible passenger loading zones and public streets or sidewalk to the accessible building entrance served Chapter 11 and ICC ANSI A117.1-2009 with MN Amendments 1104.1. An exterior accessible route with a slope not steeper than 1:20 that are part of an accessible route shall be (48”) forty-eight inches minimum in width per Chapter 11 and ICC ANSI A117.1-2009 with MN Amendments 403.5.4. a.Both sites that are to be provided with an accessible Type A unit shall have an exterior accessible route be provided to the main entrance of the dwelling unit. Exhibit E City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3300 | www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org 5) Accessible parking requirements and space for Group R2 occupancies shall be provided with not less than 1 accessible parking space and access aisle. 6) Buildings are NOT required to sprinklered per the Special Fire Protection systems subp. 2 adopted by the City of Brooklyn Center or by MNBC & MNFC 903.2.8 when a group R2 building area is less than 4,500 square feet. 7) Fire Department access roads that have a dead end shall not be in excess of (150’) one hundred-fifty feet or shall be provided with an approved area for turning around per MNFC 503.2.5. Exception where a dead-end road serves a Group R building that are equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with NFPA, the maximum dead-end length distance is permitted to be increased up to (300’) three hundred feet. 8) Fire hydrants shall be provided, if not already existing and compliant if a building within the jurisdiction is more than 300 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road as measured by and approved route around the exterior of the facility or buildings. On site fire hydrants and mains shall be provide where required by the fire code official per MNFC 507.5.1. Dan Grinsteinner Building Official City of Brooklyn Center 763-569-3313 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2020-005 FOR PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT AND SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVALS AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE 6900 BLOCK OF BROOKLYN BOULEVARD AND KNOWN AS 6921, 6927, 6933, AND 6939 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2020-005, submitted by C Alan Homes (“the Applicant”), requests review and consideration for approval of a preliminary plat, final plat, and site and building plan, and establishment of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for four properties currently owned by the Economic Development Authority (EDA) of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, located just north of 69th Avenue North and west of Brooklyn Boulevard, and known as 6921, 6927, 6933, and 6939 Brooklyn Boulevard (“the Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is currently zoned C1 (Service/Office) District under the City’s Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the Applicant appeared before the City Council of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota on May 11, 2020 for a concept plan review of their proposed development of six (6) triplexes and related site improvements on the Subject Property, in conjunction with a second proposal from the Applicant to construct another seven (7) triplexes and related improvements to the south of the Subject Property at 6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 Brooklyn Boulevard, and submitted for separate consideration under Planning Commission Application No. 2020-004; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 2020, the City Council of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota approved a Preliminary Development Agreement with C Alan Homes, LLC for the two aforementioned sets of properties located along Brooklyn Boulevard to allow the Applicant time to review the properties, obtain financing, work through City land use approvals, and negotiate with the EDA on the purchase of the properties pending approval of the aforementioned Planning Commission Application No. 2020-005; and WHEREAS, a public hearing for Planning Commission Application No. 2020-005 was initially scheduled for July 9, 2020; however, City staff exercised its rights under Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, Subd. 3(f) to extend the review period for an additional sixty (60) days to allow the Applicant additional time to reconcile adjustments necessary to the site plan for additional easements and determine the ability for driveway access off Brooklyn Boulevard from Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, on August 13, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota received and reviewed a planning report on the proposed preliminary plat, final plat, site and building plan, and Planned Unit Development proposals for the proposed new construction of seven triplexes and related site improvements on the approximately 0.98 acre site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota held a duly noticed and called public hearing on August 13, 2020, whereby a planning staff report was presented and public testimony regarding the proposal were received. Notice of such public hearing was published in the official newspaper and notices were mailed to adjacent property owners as required by City Code, and notification signage was installed on the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota considered the requests in light of all testimony received, the guidelines and standards for evaluating the preliminary and final plat under Chapter 15 (Platting), site and building plans under Chapter 35 (Zoning) and specifically Section 35-230 (Plan Approval), and Planned Unit Developments as contained in Section 35-355 (Planned Unit Development) of the City’s Zoning Code, including compliance with the guidelines for re-zoning properties, and the request complies with the general goals and objectives of the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property would be re-zoned from C1 (Service/Office) District to PUD/N-MU (Planned Unit Development-Neighborhood/Mixed Use) District, which is consistent with the future land use designation and density outlined in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota to recommend that Planning Commission Application No. 2020-005, submitted by C Alan Homes, be approved based upon the findings of fact in the August 13, 2020 planning report and submitted plans, as amended by the following conditions of approval: Anticipated Permitting 1. The Applicant shall apply for and receive a City Land Disturbance permit prior to commencing any grading or land clearance activities on the site. 2. The Applicant shall obtain any required permits from Hennepin County for work in the County right-of-way. 3. The Applicant shall meet all requirements of the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission, including incorporation of water quality measures, as specified by the City. 4. The Applicant shall apply for and receive all applicable City building permits prior to commencing construction of any work. 5. Other permits not listed may be required and is the responsibility of the developer to obtain and warrant. 6. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of applicable building and land disturbance permits. 7. A preconstruction conference must be scheduled and held with City staff and other entities designated by the City. Plat Review 8. Approval of the preliminary and final plats are contingent upon the addressing of comments by Assistant City Engineer Hogg in his memorandum dated August 4, 2020. a. The Applicant shall complete the vacation of any identified easements and ensure notice of completion of vacation is recorded with Hennepin County prior to recording of final plat and mylar. 9. Final plat and mylar shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Code of Ordinances (Platting). 10. Any comments and/or requirements as provided by Hennepin County. 11. Any comments and/or requirements from the City Attorney’s office, and specifically regarding an updated certified abstract of title. 12. The successful recording of said plat (mylar) with Hennepin County. PUD / Site Plan Review 13. Any significant changes or modifications made to this request can only be made by an amendment to the approved Planned Unit Development as approved by the City Council. 14. The Applicant shall enter into a Purchase Agreement with the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center prior to the execution of the Final Plat. 15. The Applicant shall enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center prior to the execution of the Final Plat. 16. The Applicant shall distribute Section 8 units through each of the identified three floors of triplex buildings identified for Section 8 voucher holders so as to prevent designating a particular level for such units. 17. The Applicant shall enter into a Performance Agreement with supporting financial guarantee approved by the City shall be executed prior to the issuance of any permits. 18. The Applicant shall enter into a Construction Management Plan and Agreement and provide a separate deposit for any non-compliance. Engineering Review 19. The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer’s Review memorandum, dated August 4, 2020. a. Final grading, drainage, utility, and erosion control plans and any other site engineering related issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer for City site and building plan approval and prior to the issuance of permits. Fire Inspector/ Building Official Review 20. The Applicant shall work to ensure all applicable 2015 Minnesota Fire Code requirements have been met as part of any plan approval, including installation of a minimum 20-foot wide drive aisle. 21. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 22. The Applicant shall apply for a SAC determination from the Metropolitan Council. Said determination shall be forwarded to the City and paid for upon issuance of any City permits. 23. The Applicant shall work with the Building Official to address all minimum requirements for accessibility as they relate to units, parking, accessible routes, etc. August 24, 2020 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 583218v1BR291-4 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the ____ day of __________, 2020, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as part of the regular City Council meeting to consider an Ordinance amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances regarding the zoning classification of certain lands located along Brooklyn Boulevard. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please notify the City Clerk at 763-569-3306 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. 2020- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LANDS LOCATED ALONG BROOKLYN BOULEVARD THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Rezoning. Chapter 35, Section 35-1240 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended as follows: Section 35-1240. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUD). The following property is hereby established as being within a (PUD) Planned Unit Development District Zoning Classification: 12. The following properties are designated as PUD-N/MU (Neighborhood Mixed Use) District: Robertson & Brekke’s Brookyln Boulevard First Addition, Lots 1 through 7, Block 1. Robertson & Brekke’s Brookyln Boulevard Second Addition, Lots 1 through 6, Block 1. Adopted this day of , 2020. _____________________________ Mike Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Date of Publication 2 583218v1BR291-4 Effective Date (Note: Strikeout text indicates matter to be delete, double underline text indicates new matter.) C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:8/24/2020 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:C urt Boganey, City Manager T H R O U G H :N/A BY:D r. Reggie Edwards S U B J E C T:Res olu*on A uthoriz ing S taff to P roceed with the B C Beyond C O V I D Community I nnova*on G rant P rogram P ilot P roject, w ith w ill be funded by the G eneral F und through the Use of Available C on*ngency F unds B ackground: O n J uly 13, 2020 s taff pr es ented to the C ouncil and E DA Commission the purpose, proces s and pilot projects for B C Beyond C O V I D I nnova*on I ni*a*ve. The purpos e of the ini*a*ve was : To w ork w ith res idents and bus inesses , so that they may survive, rebuild and thrive in the era of C O V I D -19 Worldwide Pandemic. The guiding principles for comple*ng the ini*a*ve w ere: We w ill ensure opportunity for all residents and busines s es to survive and thrive We w ill focus our efforts w here the needs are greates t We w ill act in profound and unprecedented w ays to match an unprecedented event We w ill embrace and s hape the C ity ’s new normal We w ill commit City neces s ary resources (i.e. human, skills , and capital) to meet imminent needs of res idents and bus inesses The following framew ork w as used in defining innova*on: Crea*ng an innova*ve organiza*on New ideas and ways of doing bus iness Looking for opportuni*es to create a break-through idea S olve uns olvable problems Exceeding ci*z en expecta*ons The process involved the following s teps: 1. I den*fy the need (research actual and similar events, interview res idents) 2. Research (S imilar events and innova*ons /strategies ) 3. Brainstorm strategies 4. Mockup projects efforts and internal s cenario tes t 5. P ilot (resident capacity, city s ervice, city opera*ons ) Bas ed on community res earch the follow ing top needs were iden*fied: Resources life essen*als (i.e. food, rent/housing, etc.) H ousing S tability Emo*onal and Mental H ealth Well-Being F inancial A s s is tance to Busines s Communica*on on C O V I D -19 and A cces s to Resources H igh S peed I nternet Job C rea*on S taff iden*fied over 70 innova*ve strategies to address those needs . S taff were asked to iden*fy innova*ons that would bes t addres s all or as many of the needs as pos s ible. O ne of the top innova*ons iden*fied was "B C Community I nnova*on G rant P rogram”. D uring concep*on of this innova*on s taff proposed the follow ing thought to thems elv es, “I magine The P roblems A N eighborhood I nnova*on G r ant C an H elp S olve”. I n think ing through that thought, the s cope and needs to be addressed w ere iden*fied. S C O P E A N D I S S U E S D ue to the coronavirus pandemic, the Neighborhood I nnova*on G rant w as designed to as s is t with the challenges individuals and neighborhood groups and/or busines s es opera*ng in Brooklyn Center w ere experiencing. Needs: F inancial assistance for bus iness, H igh-s peed internet and technology Emo*onal health and w ell-being Communica*on of health and s afety resources available to res idents Job crea*on O Hen, the bes t ideas and s olu*ons come fr om thos e within community. T hes e grants are to fund problem- s olving proj ects to as s is t in neighborhood impr ovement and beyond, through s kill inves tment. This pilot w ould prov ide Neighborhood I nnov a*on G rants to neighborhood-based gr oups , individuals and nonprofit organiza*ons oper a*ng in Brooklyn C enter to res olve a C O V I D related problem in the C ity. P rojects would need to be completed w ithin 90-days or unles s *me extension were to be granted. Timeline P ilot would be up and running as of O ctober 1, 2020 Rolling grant applica*on period with applica*ons being review ed quarterly. Review proces s will evaluate the applica*on and the impact the propos ed project w ould have on the community/bus iness/etc. A pplicants w ill be eligible to receive funds once per year. The program will con*nue annually as funds are budgeted. Limited resources played a significant factor in the implementa*on of the four pilot proj ects. C A R E S A C T F unding provides the opportunity to fund two of the four proj ects, w hich the B C Community I nnova*on G rant P r ogr am w as not one of them. Becaus e C A R E S A C T F unding and higher than expected tax collec*on this proj ect can be funded thr ough general fund emergency funds. Becaus e, this proj ect w as not included ini*ally in the budget and is an expenditure resul*ng fr om need to res pond to the C O V I D -19 Pandemic general fund emer gency dollars w ould be an appropr iate us e and adequate funding would be available ($50,000). S taff recommends moving forward with this pilot. I s there a consens us of the C ouncil direc*ng s taff to proceed with the B C Beyond C O V I D Community I nnova*on G rant P rogram with or w ithout loca*on modifica*ons? B udget I ssues: The total funding for this pilot is $50,000, w hich w ould be funded by the G eneral F und through the us e of available con*ngency funds. S trategic Priories and Values: Resident Economic S tability, I nclusive C ommunity Engagement, S afe, S ecure, S table C ommunity AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip*on U pload D ate Type Powerpoint 8/18/2020 Backup M aterial resolu*on 8/20/2020 Resolu*on LeLer 8/18/2020 1 BC Beyond COVID Brooklyn Center City Council Presentation Monday, July 13, 2020 BC Beyond COVID Purpose: •To  work with residents and businesses, so that they may  survive, rebuild and thrive in the era of COVID‐19 Worldwide   Pandemic.  Principles: •We  will ensure opportunity for all residents and businesses to  survive and thrive  •We  will focus our efforts where the needs are greatest •We  will act in profound and unprecedented ways to match an  unprecedented event  •We  will embrace and shape the City’s new normal •We  will commit City necessary resources (i.e. human, skills,  and capital) to meet imminent needs of residents and  businesses  July 13, 2020City Council Presentation 8/18/2020 2 Defining Innovate •Creating an innovative organization •New ideas and ways of doing  business •Looking for  opportunities to create a  break‐through idea •Solve unsolvable problems •Exceeding citizen expectations BC Beyond COVID Framework 8/18/2020 3 U Process IDEO Innovation Process 1. Identify the need (research actual and similar  events, interview residents) 2. Research (Similar events and  innovations/strategies)  3. Brainstorm strategies 4. Mockup projects efforts and internal scenario  test 5. Pilot (resident capacity, city service, city  operations) 8/18/2020 4 Community Deep Dive Questions:  1. What has been your experience as a resident and/or business with  the COVID‐19 Pandemic? 2. What have you observed regarding how COVID‐19 has affected  residents and/or businesses? Can you share a story to illustrate the  affect? 3. During the COVID‐19 Pandemic, what were the more challenging  issues experienced by residents and/or businesses? Can you share a  story to illustrate the challenge? 4. During the COVID‐19 Pandemic, what were some surprisingly positive  events experienced by residents and/or businesses? Can you share a  story to illustrate the event? 5. From your perspective, how do you believe the COVID‐19 Pandemic  will affect residents and/or businesses in the coming 3‐6 months? 6. From your perspective, how do you believe the COVID‐19 Pandemic  will affect residents and/or businesses in the coming 12‐18 months? BC Beyond COVID – Community Needs Ranking Conducting Ranking  Feedback •Comments of  Experience: •Difficulty •Deal with multifaceted  and dynamic problem •Organizational  innovative flexibility  Top  Rankings •Resources life essentials (i.e.  food, rent/housing, etc.) •Housing Stability  •Emotional and Mental  Health Well ‐Being •Financial Assistance to  Business  •Communication on COVID‐ 19 and Access to Resources •High Speed Internet •Job Creation  8/18/2020 5 BROOKLYN CENTER SENIOR IPAD/TABLET PROGRAM BC Beyond COVID‐19 / Pilot Project #1 Pilot Project Vision and Goals Vision •To  enhance connectivity and reduce the sense of isolation  amongst the senior population in Brooklyn Center Goals •Develop a sense of increased communal connectivity  amongst Brooklyn Center seniors •Reduced sense of emotional and physical isolation amongst  Brooklyn Center seniors •Increased participation in CARS programming amongst  Brooklyn Center seniors •Disseminate, at a minimum, 50 tablets to Brooklyn Center  seniors. 10 8/18/2020 6 Needs and Benefits Needs •Technology •Mental and  Emotional Health •Communications of  Health Resources Benefits •Telehealth •Recreation  Programming •Family Connections •Mobility Services  access •Essential Services  access 11 Senior Tablet  Action Items 12 Select Recipients Establish Tracking  Processes Budget Tracking Inventory Recipient Information Identify Useful Applications SilverSneakers Zoom Head Space Metro Transit Food Delivery Link to City Website 8/18/2020 7 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES: PARTNERS: 13 WiFi IN NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS BC Beyond COVID‐19 / Pilot Project #2 8/18/2020 8 15 WiFi in Brooklyn Center Parks Outcomes –Access internet during  park hours (5am‐10pm)  365 days a year –Those without internet  access can apply for jobs,  complete school work or  interact with others –City departments hold  educational opportunities  and programs to engage  community 16 8/18/2020 9 WiFi in Brooklyn Center Parks •Pilot Park: Firehouse Park –Close proximity to several  apartment complexes –Picnic shelter with tables –Near BC Middle and High  School •Estimated up and running  time –30 days •Pilot Length –1 year 17 NEIGHBORHOOD INNOVATION GRANT PROGRAM BC Beyond COVID‐19 / Pilot Project #3 8/18/2020 10 19 Imagine The  Problems A  Neighborhood  Innovation Grant  Can Help Solve  SCOPE AND ISSUES   Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the  Neighborhood Innovation Grant was  designed to assist with the challenges  individuals and neighborhood groups and/or  businesses operating in Brooklyn Center  were experiencing.  Needs: •Financial assistance for business,  •High‐speed internet and technology •Emotional health and well‐being •Communication of health and safety  resources available to residents •Job creation.  Often, the best ideas and solutions come  from those within community. These grants  are to fund problem‐solving projects to assist  in neighborhood improvement and beyond,  through skill investment.  8/18/2020 11 GEOGRAPHY / LOCATION  The Neighborhood Innovation  Grant is available to neighborhood‐ based groups, individuals and  nonprofit organizations operating  in Brooklyn Center DESIGN TO LEARN USEFUL  LESSONS AND EXPAND  Projects must be completed within  90‐days and funded applicants will  be asked to complete a brief report  (so we can learn from their work).  Extended time may be requested  and will be approved on case by  case basis.  22 Timeline Pilot would be up and running  as of October 1, 2020 Rolling grant application period  with applications being  reviewed quarterly.  Review process will evaluate the  application and the impact the  proposed project would have on  the community/business/etc. Applicants will be eligible to  receive funds once per year. The  program will continue annually  as funds are budgeted. Applicants who receive grants  will be asked to complete a W‐9  Form, which will be provided by  the City. 8/18/2020 12 BC COMMUNITY FOOD COLLECTIVE SUPPLYING HEALTHY FOOD EDUCATION JOBS      BC Beyond COVID‐19 / Pilot Project #4 Scope and Issues •Lack of access to  affordable healthy  food •Interruptions in  food supply chain •Lack of knowledge  about how to grow  and cook with fresh  produce 8/18/2020 13 Pilot Project Description •Deep Winter Greenhouse for  year‐round food production –Culturally‐appropriate produce •Job Opportunities •Training for residents •Tool library •CSA style pay‐what‐you‐can  membership model •Scalable and flexible program  and design •Urban agriculture Deep Winter Greenhouse Design 8/18/2020 14 Opportunities •Classes and workshops on how  to grow your own food, how to  compost, build a raised garden,  prepare and cook with fresh  food, etc. •Hire residents of various ages,  experiences and backgrounds  as onsite staff to provide  classes, oversee planting and  harvesting, organize garden  clubs, etc. •Hire residents to assist with the  work for money or CSA shares Opportunities •Solar power to the  greenhouse for  the  heating •Utilize a cistern  system to collect  stormwater runoff  to water the plants 8/18/2020 15 Location Location Advantages •Access to utilities •Access to parking •Access to bus  service •Access to  bathrooms/kitchen •Captive audience – existing health and  wellness programs Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. _______________ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING STAFF TO PROCEED WITH THE BC BEYOND COVID COMMUNITY INNOVATION GRANT PROGRAM PILOT PROJECT, WHICH WILL BE FUNDED BY THE GENERAL FUND THROUGH THE USE OF AVAILABLE CONTINGENCY FUNDS. WHEREAS, In July 2020, the City initiated the development of innovative actions to work with residents and businesses, so that they may survive, rebuild and thrive in the era of COVID- 19 Worldwide Pandemic; and WHEREAS, Based on community research the following top needs were identified: 1) Resources life essentials (i.e. food, rent/housing, etc.), 2) Housing Stability, 3) Emotional and Mental Health Well-Being, 4) Financial Assistance to Business, 5) Communication on COVID- 19 and Access to Resources, 6) High Speed Internet and 7) Job Creation; and WHEREAS, Staff identified over 70 innovative strategies to address those needs. However, the top innovative strategies were to address all or as many of the needs as possible. One of four top innovations identified was "BC Community Innovation Grant Program"; and WHEREAS, The BC Community Innovation Grant Program qualifies as an appropriate expenditure and there are sufficient General Fund contingency funds to cover the $50,000 total cost to implement the pilot. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, authorize staff to proceed with the BC Beyond COVID Community Innovation Grant Program pilot project, which will be funded by the General Fund through available contingency funds. August 24, 2020 Date President ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council/E D A Work S ession V I RT UA L meeting being conducted by electronic means in accordance with Minnesota S tatutes, section 13D.021 P ublic portion available for connection by calling 1-312-535-8110 A ccess Code: 133 316 6939 A ugust 24, 2020 AGE NDA AC T I V E D I S C US S IO N I T E M S 1.B C Beyond C O V I D W ifi in the Park Pilot P roject 2.T H 252/I -94 Update P E ND I NG L I S T F O R F UT URE WO RK S E S S IO NS 1.Pending I tems Housing P olicy - 9/2 City-wide S ewer Access Charge Policy - 9/14 Council P olicy for City Charter requirement of Mayor's signature on all contracts - 9/14 Tobacco Regulations - 9/14 Beautification and P ublic Art Strategic P lans for years 2018-2020 and 2021-2023 Council's Retreat Follow up NO A H P reservation P rogram Review Special Assessment Policy Earle Brown name Vehicle Tow Policy Citizen's Review Committee Organic Recycling MEMOR ANDUM - C OUNCIL WOR K SESSION DAT E:8/24/2020 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:N/A BY:Dr. R eggie Edwards , Deputy C ity Manager S UBJ EC T:BC Beyond C O VI D Wifi in the P ark P ilot P roject Recommendation: - S taff recommends that the C ouncil directs staff to proceed forward with the B C B eyond C O V I D Wifi in the P ark P ilot P roject Background: O n July 13, 2020 staff presented to the C ounc il the purpose, proc es s and pilot projec ts for BC Beyond C O VI D Innovation Initiative. T he purpos e of the initiative was: To work with residents and busines s es , s o that they may survive, rebuild and thrive in the era of C O VI D-19 Worldwide P andemic . T he guiding princ iples for completing the initiative were: We will ensure opportunity for all residents and busines s es to survive and thrive We will focus our efforts where the needs are greates t We will act in profound and unprecedented ways to match an unprec edented event We will embrace and s hape the C ity’s new normal We will commit C ity nec es s ary res ourc es (i.e. human, skills , and capital) to meet imminent needs of res idents and bus inesses T he following framework was used in defining innovation: C reating an innovative organization New ideas and ways of doing busines s Looking for opportunities to create a break-through idea S olve uns olvable problems Exc eeding c itizen expectations T he proc es s involved the following s teps: 1. Identify the need (res earch ac tual and similar events, interview res idents ) 2. R es earch (S imilar events and innovations/s trategies) 3. Brains torm s trategies 4. Moc kup projec ts efforts and internal s cenario tes t 5. P ilot (res ident c apacity, city s ervic e, city operations ) Based on community res earch the following top needs were identified: R es ourc es life es s entials (i.e. food, rent/housing, etc.) Housing S tability Emotional and Mental Health Well-Being F inancial As s is tance to Bus iness C ommunication on C O VI D-19 and Acc es s to R esources High S peed Internet Job C reation S taff identified over 70 innovative s trategies to addres s those needs. S taff were as ked to identify innovations that would best address all or as many of the needs as possible. O ne of the top innovations identified was "Wifi in the P ark". T he desired outcomes from this initiative are: T hos e without internet acc es s c an apply for jobs, c omplete s chool work or interac t with others Acc es s internet during park hours (5am-10pm) 365 days a year C ity departments hold educational opportunities and programs to engage c ommunity T he initiative was s cheduled to be up and running within 30 days and be evaluated for one year (pilot duration time). S taff pres ented piloting the initiative at the F irehous e P ark, becaus e of acc es s to C ity public : C los e proximity to several apartment c omplexes P icnic s helter with tables Near BC Middle and High S chool Limited res ourc es also played a signific ant fac tor in the selec tion of piloting at only one site. F ollowing the initiation and presentation of the pilot C AR ES AC T F unding became available and permits a broader pilot to inc lude five parks (e.g., F irehouse, Lions , C entennial, Northport and Willow Lane) s trategic ally placed throughout the C ity. S taff believes the expanded pilot would provide a better as s es s ment of the innovative s trategy impac ting the desired outcomes. F ollowing the C ounc il presentation a resident pres ented opposition to the pilot. Attached is an copy of communic ation between the res ident and staff, as well as, c opy of an article by the National R ecreation and P ark Assoc iation, Drawing Kids to Nature T hrough Tec h. Attac hed is a s econd article related to tec hnology and parks s pecific ally about the debate of technology in parks (Tom Dellner, May 1, 2017, P arks Us ing Tec hnology to Engage and Inspire). Policy Issues: Is there a cons ensus of the C ounc il direc ting s taff to proceed with the BC Beyond C O VI D P ilot with or without location modifications? S trategic Priorities and Values: R es ident Ec onomic S tability, Inc lusive C ommunity Engagement, S afe, S ec ure, S table C ommunity, C ustomer Intimac y AT TAC HME N T S: Desc ription Upload Date Type Email C ommunication with Ms. Joy on Wifi in P arks 8/18/2020 C over Memo Article Introducing Kids to Nature T hrough Tec h 8/18/2020 C over Memo P arks Using Tec h t Ins pire and Engage (Debate on Tech in P arks )8/18/2020 C over Memo P owerpoint 8/18/2020 Bac kup Material From: Reggie Edwards Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 12:01 PM To: 'Joy' <joypl@usfamily.net> Subject: RE: Wifi in BC Hello Ms. Anderson, Thank you for your comments and suggestions to the Council regarding Wi-Fi in the parks. I was out on vacation much of last week and I am just getting a chance to respond to your email. The City is looking to pilot the idea of Wi-Fi in the park for several reasons related to helping residents survive, rebuild and thrive in the COVID era. Some of the needs this pilot would meet include: • Access to internet services for youth and families who are unable to access it, • Access for job and/or training purposes (Resident Economic Stability), • Access for distant learning (Students), • Providing of positive and safe socialization to overcome increased social isolation during COVID and mental health • Increase use of parks/trails by residents and the experience of green space/outdoors The City does recognize your concern regarding the benefit of enjoying the natural environment and the natural energy that flows from it. The City would wholeheartedly agree with you on the benefits of experiencing the natural environment and the positive impact in has on the quality of life of people. The City shall seek to balance the various benefits of the parks and trails with the various needs of all residents. Please be assured that the City has heard you and will take into account at every step how we preserve the experience of nature in the parks and on the trails. Thanks again for raising your voice, concerns and sharing your wisdom. Respectfully Yours, Reggie Edwards, Deputy City Manager From: Joy <joypl@usfamily.net> Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 3:21 PM To: Reggie Edwards <redwards@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us> Subject: Wifi in BC Hi Reggie, I spoke during the open forum section on 7/27 /20 objecting to Wifi in our city parks and city wide. Did you hear about it or listen to what I said? I would like to make sure this has stopped and will not happen. Please update me. Thanks, Joy Joy Anderson 30 year Brooklyn Center resident joypl@usfamily.net 763-566-9785 ________________________________________ Email Confidentiality Statement: This message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete the message and all copies and backups thereof. onthly magazine July Park Pulse: Bridging Technology and Nature Connects Children to Parks July 6, 2018, Department, by National Recreation and Park Association  Research Each month, through a poll of Americans that is focused on park and recreation issues, NRPA Park Pulse will help to tell the park and recreation story. Questions span from the serious to the more lighthearted, and with this month’s poll, we asked Americans: How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement: merging tech and nature will increase children’s desire to go to parks? For example, having free Wi -Fi, interactive digital displays and games, or map-based apps for parks. Nearly 70 percent of Americans agree that merging technology and nature will increase children’s desire to go to parks. This includes having free Wi-Fi, interactive digital displays and games, or map-based apps for parks. Tech-savvy millennials are even more likely than Gen Xers and baby boomers to feel this way. Millennials 77% Gen Xers 71% Baby Boomers 61% The National Recreation and Park Association Survey was conducted by Wakefield Research (www.wakefieldresearch.com) among 1,000 adult Americans, ages 18+, between May 21st and May 25th, 2018, using an email invitation and an online survey. Quotas have been set to ensure reliable and accurate representation of the U.S. adult population 18 and older. Parks Using Technology to Engage and Inspire May 1, 2017, Department, by Tom Dellner  Technology Imagine a citywide system of smart parks. Visitors entering parks from their residences or urban work spaces, remaining seamlessly connected by Wi-Fi to their devices and, by extension, their families and work responsibilities, as they enjoy some sunshine and fresh air. Park users learning about, and registering for, park events and activities from smartphone apps or interactive digital displays. Children playing longer and more vigorously on smart playgrounds linked to gaming apps on their parents’ phones, which have been fully charged on a solar-powered park bench. Other kids of all ages using Pokemon GO-like apps to engage with, learn about and develop a connection with the outdoors, all while developing a lifelong love of parks and nature as they play. It’s anything but a futuristic vision. All these capabilities, and many more, exist today, and they may be more affordable and easily implemented than you might think. But first, does technology even belong in a park? The Great Tech Debate There remains a contingent of purists among park professionals — those who believe that technology has no place in a park, which should be a refuge, a place to escape from the fast pace of our tech-driven lives. Edward Krafcik, director of partnerships and business development at SOOFA, makers of a solar-powered phone-charging bench, encounters the tech naysayers fairly regularly, but he believes they comprise an ever-diminishing minority. “Many others are starting to question what happens if we refuse to provide services that are expected or demanded by the connected generation. Do we miss out on engaging an entire generation with our parks?” he asks. Mark Saferstein, of American Park Network, which provides Oh,Ranger! Wi-Fi services to parks, agrees. “I think the conversation about parks and technology is much like those we’ve all had each time a new technology emerges,” he says. “At first, there’s typically resistance to change, followed by a begrudging acceptance and then, ultimately, everyone wonders how we got along without this great new advancement.” A.P. Diaz, executive officer and chief of staff for the Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks, says, “Parks simply can’t afford to stand pat and expect to remain relevant and competitive in today’s fast-paced, technology-driven world. In L.A., we are quickly moving forward on technology and helping our visitors be more connected and engaged, and perhaps, we’re challenging traditional definitions of recreation in what we offer. But, I think as long as we are mindful of not inappropriately crossing the line so that a park is no longer recognizable as a park, we’ll be able to maintain the right balance and convert many of the naysayers by demonstrating that technology is a tool that can enhance the park experience.” Advantages — Obvious and Less So Today’s most common tech-based services come with fairly obvious advantages. Wi-Fi allows the always-connected consumer to maintain their online lifestyle inside the boundaries of a park, engaging with media — social and otherwise — and staying in touch with work and family. Charging benches are welcomed amenities that keep those smart devices up and running. Proprietary, park-designed apps can educate visitors about activities in a particular park, as well as others in the system that the visitor wasn’t even aware of, and give them the opportunity to register for events or reserve space. A new app that has been proven to be successful in Los Angeles allows park visitors to alert staff to areas of the park that require immediate maintenance or cleaning. This helps the parks more efficiently handle these issues and demonstrates to visitors the responsiveness and dedication of the park maintenance staff. A less obvious benefit of technology is the vast amount of data that many of these services can provide park agencies. Sensors on the SOOFA charging benches track smartphone hotspot searches, which can yield valuable attendance and usage data. The data can be used to establish baseline usage patterns, which can then be compared to data from special events or when new capital improvements are added. “Now, you can begin to ask whether a newly installed dog park or playground is getting the anticipated use,” says Krafcik. “‘Are they successful?’ ‘Should we make changes?’ Now we have a data-driven framework to begin to answer these questions.” Wi-Fi networks can deliver extremely valuable information about how people are using the network. This can give park staff important demographic data regarding their visitors or reveal potential new marketing channels based on the visitors’ online activity. Camera vision technology on light poles along paths can document and distinguish between walkers, runners and cyclists, which is data agencies couldn’t easily access before. Even traditional information- gathering tools, like surveys, can be made much more effective and generate a far greater response rate when attached to an app or interactive digital platform. Social media provides a wealth of benefits all its own. It can serve as its very own marketing and promotion channel. As visitors share their photos and comments about the great time they are having, they motivate their friends and followers to join in on the fun. Even if someone is unable to drop what they are doing and head to the park, the seed of a future park-goer has been planted. The unique Flying Shard art exhibit in Pershing Square in downtown Los Angeles is a great example. The spectacular, massive, moving sculpture went viral on social media. Photos and comments drove thousands to attend the exhibit and to visit Pershing Square during and after the exhibit. People drove in from the suburbs and workers in adjoining office buildings visited the park for the very first time because of the social media coverage. Larger parks are even using social media as “crowd-sourced, data-gathering tools” to help track the movement of wildlife throughout the park or to document the effects of climate change on vegetation patterns. Technology is also a wonderful way to bring social equity to the park system. Computer banks in youth or senior centers can teach valuable skills to underserved populations. Wi-Fi in neighborhood parks can provide free internet connection in parts of the community where it is otherwise scarce. App-based gaming systems, like the ones described below, are being made available in multiple languages and are being refined to put physically or emotionally challenged children at the center of play. Engaged Kids Of course, kids are thrilled to be able to use their beloved devices in a park. Indeed, it may often be what is required to get them to willingly go to a park in the first place. Several innovative companies are already using those screens in parks for more noble purposes. For example, in St. Petersburg, Florida, the parks and recreation department is working on a virtual application that will link all of its archeological parks together. “The ultimate goal of this project is that when a patron visits one of our archeological parks, they will be able to use their smart device to open an application that will allow them to see the site in real time, with an artist’s rendition of what that site would have looked like during the time Indians inhabited the area,” says Bryan Eichler, parks and recreation manager for St. Petersburg Parks and Recreation. Along with the visual component, the app will pull up information, articles and pictures of artifacts associated with the particular site, as well as locations of additional sites of interest (click here for an example of this technology). “We hope to work with local schools so they can use this resource as a teaching tool through our website and then actually visit the sites for an up- close experience,” Eichler adds. In the past three years, augmented reality games have also come to local playgrounds. More than 200 “smart playgrounds” that use app-based games in conjunction with playground equipment have been deployed across the United States by a company called Play Biba. Whether children are playing on Biba-powered equipment or equipment that has been converted into a smart playground, their parents simply have to open up an app that allows the children to play age- appropriate, interactive, imagination-fueled games. Other app-based games, such as Discovery Agents’ “Mission Maker,” promote getting kids out in nature and learning, and allow park staff to customize “missions” based on the features of the park. These missions use geo-triggered content, and challenges may center on the geographic landscape of a particular park. “We work with local schools to create grade-specific missions that are aligned with the schools’ curriculum,” says Ed Mastro, exhibit director at L.A.’s Cabrillo Beach. “Our park becomes an extension of the classroom. I’ve seen the ‘a-ha’ moments as the kids work through the game and solve challenges. It’s not tied to a teacher or a classroom; it’s tied to nature. And, you can see them getting distracted by the birds and flowers and other aspects of the outdoors, before getting back to the game. That’s all part of the magic.” Research has shown that these interactive games are not only a marvelously effective learning tool, but also cause kids to play longer, harder and more often. In addition, parents can access a dashboard showing their children’s physical activity profile, and parks are provided with a wealth of data, including usage patterns, distance walked, and challenges engaged with and solved. Challenges of Implementation The experts offer a number of best practices for implementing technology-based programs. Perhaps the most universal is not to think the project's complete once it’s operational. “These are not ‘set it and forget it’ endeavors,” says Saferstein. “They must be properly maintained, and should evolve to suit the changing needs of both parks and visitors. The worst thing you can do is offer a needed service and then let it wane or take it away. Also,when you implement new technology, the best results will come from collaboration. This means an open, on-going dialogue about how a digital portal in parks can help educate visitors, support operations and ’market’ the parks.” Krafcik agrees. “Don’t deem something a success just because it’s been implemented. Gather some data, analyze it and follow it through to an outcome — maybe something as simple as assessing the success of a special event,” he says. “But when you do that, you’re integrating the new system into your workflow and really bringing the innovation to life.” Perhaps the greatest obstacle is overcoming the resistance to change. “Any new endeavor seems daunting at the beginning,” says Diaz. “Technology especially can be overwhelming. So for us, the first step is always gaining knowledge, which is one of the reasons it’s so important for park agencies to be in communication with one another. Then we set attainable goals. “But it really comes down to not being afraid to try something. In L.A., our motto has always been to just try it. If it doesn’t work, what’s the worst thing that happens? You just pull it back. But it might be fantastic and engage park users and make parks more fun, interesting and relevant, and that’s what we’re here to do.” Tom Dellner is a Freelance Writer, based in Dana Point, California. 8/18/2020 1 BC Beyond COVID Brooklyn Center City Council Presentation Monday, July 13, 2020 BC Beyond COVID Purpose: •To  work with residents and businesses, so that they may  survive, rebuild and thrive in the era of COVID‐19 Worldwide   Pandemic.  Principles: •We  will ensure opportunity for all residents and businesses to  survive and thrive  •We  will focus our efforts where the needs are greatest •We  will act in profound and unprecedented ways to match an  unprecedented event  •We  will embrace and shape the City’s new normal •We  will commit City necessary resources (i.e. human, skills,  and capital) to meet imminent needs of residents and  businesses  July 13, 2020City Council Presentation 8/18/2020 2 Defining Innovate •Creating an innovative organization •New ideas and ways of doing  business •Looking for  opportunities to create a  break‐through idea •Solve unsolvable problems •Exceeding citizen expectations BC Beyond COVID Framework 8/18/2020 3 U Process IDEO Innovation Process 1. Identify the need (research actual and similar  events, interview residents) 2. Research (Similar events and  innovations/strategies)  3. Brainstorm strategies 4. Mockup projects efforts and internal scenario  test 5. Pilot (resident capacity, city service, city  operations) 8/18/2020 4 Community Deep Dive Questions:  1. What has been your experience as a resident and/or business with  the COVID‐19 Pandemic? 2. What have you observed regarding how COVID‐19 has affected  residents and/or businesses? Can you share a story to illustrate the  affect? 3. During the COVID‐19 Pandemic, what were the more challenging  issues experienced by residents and/or businesses? Can you share a  story to illustrate the challenge? 4. During the COVID‐19 Pandemic, what were some surprisingly positive  events experienced by residents and/or businesses? Can you share a  story to illustrate the event? 5. From your perspective, how do you believe the COVID‐19 Pandemic  will affect residents and/or businesses in the coming 3‐6 months? 6. From your perspective, how do you believe the COVID‐19 Pandemic  will affect residents and/or businesses in the coming 12‐18 months? BC Beyond COVID – Community Needs Ranking Conducting Ranking  Feedback •Comments of  Experience: •Difficulty •Deal with multifaceted  and dynamic problem •Organizational  innovative flexibility  Top  Rankings •Resources life essentials (i.e.  food, rent/housing, etc.) •Housing Stability  •Emotional and Mental  Health Well ‐Being •Financial Assistance to  Business  •Communication on COVID‐ 19 and Access to Resources •High Speed Internet •Job Creation  8/18/2020 5 BROOKLYN CENTER SENIOR IPAD/TABLET PROGRAM BC Beyond COVID‐19 / Pilot Project #1 Pilot Project Vision and Goals Vision •To  enhance connectivity and reduce the sense of isolation  amongst the senior population in Brooklyn Center Goals •Develop a sense of increased communal connectivity  amongst Brooklyn Center seniors •Reduced sense of emotional and physical isolation amongst  Brooklyn Center seniors •Increased participation in CARS programming amongst  Brooklyn Center seniors •Disseminate, at a minimum, 50 tablets to Brooklyn Center  seniors. 10 8/18/2020 6 Needs and Benefits Needs •Technology •Mental and  Emotional Health •Communications of  Health Resources Benefits •Telehealth •Recreation  Programming •Family Connections •Mobility Services  access •Essential Services  access 11 Senior Tablet  Action Items 12 Select Recipients Establish Tracking  Processes Budget Tracking Inventory Recipient Information Identify Useful Applications SilverSneakers Zoom Head Space Metro Transit Food Delivery Link to City Website 8/18/2020 7 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES: PARTNERS: 13 WiFi IN NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS BC Beyond COVID‐19 / Pilot Project #2 8/18/2020 8 15 WiFi in Brooklyn Center Parks Outcomes –Access internet during  park hours (5am‐10pm)  365 days a year –Those without internet  access can apply for jobs,  complete school work or  interact with others –City departments hold  educational opportunities  and programs to engage  community 16 8/18/2020 9 WiFi in Brooklyn Center Parks •Pilot Park: Firehouse Park –Close proximity to several  apartment complexes –Picnic shelter with tables –Near BC Middle and High  School •Estimated up and running  time –30 days •Pilot Length –1 year 17 NEIGHBORHOOD INNOVATION GRANT PROGRAM BC Beyond COVID‐19 / Pilot Project #3 8/18/2020 10 19 Imagine The  Problems A  Neighborhood  Innovation Grant  Can Help Solve  SCOPE AND ISSUES   Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the  Neighborhood Innovation Grant was  designed to assist with the challenges  individuals and neighborhood groups and/or  businesses operating in Brooklyn Center  were experiencing.  Needs: •Financial assistance for business,  •High‐speed internet and technology •Emotional health and well‐being •Communication of health and safety  resources available to residents •Job creation.  Often, the best ideas and solutions come  from those within community. These grants  are to fund problem‐solving projects to assist  in neighborhood improvement and beyond,  through skill investment.  8/18/2020 11 GEOGRAPHY / LOCATION  The Neighborhood Innovation  Grant is available to neighborhood‐ based groups, individuals and  nonprofit organizations operating  in Brooklyn Center DESIGN TO LEARN USEFUL  LESSONS AND EXPAND  Projects must be completed within  90‐days and funded applicants will  be asked to complete a brief report  (so we can learn from their work).  Extended time may be requested  and will be approved on case by  case basis.  22 Timeline Pilot would be up and running  as of October 1, 2020 Rolling grant application period  with applications being  reviewed quarterly.  Review process will evaluate the  application and the impact the  proposed project would have on  the community/business/etc. Applicants will be eligible to  receive funds once per year. The  program will continue annually  as funds are budgeted. Applicants who receive grants  will be asked to complete a W‐9  Form, which will be provided by  the City. 8/18/2020 12 BC COMMUNITY FOOD COLLECTIVE SUPPLYING HEALTHY FOOD EDUCATION JOBS      BC Beyond COVID‐19 / Pilot Project #4 Scope and Issues •Lack of access to  affordable healthy  food •Interruptions in  food supply chain •Lack of knowledge  about how to grow  and cook with fresh  produce 8/18/2020 13 Pilot Project Description •Deep Winter Greenhouse for  year‐round food production –Culturally‐appropriate produce •Job Opportunities •Training for residents •Tool library •CSA style pay‐what‐you‐can  membership model •Scalable and flexible program  and design •Urban agriculture Deep Winter Greenhouse Design 8/18/2020 14 Opportunities •Classes and workshops on how  to grow your own food, how to  compost, build a raised garden,  prepare and cook with fresh  food, etc. •Hire residents of various ages,  experiences and backgrounds  as onsite staff to provide  classes, oversee planting and  harvesting, organize garden  clubs, etc. •Hire residents to assist with the  work for money or CSA shares Opportunities •Solar power to the  greenhouse for  the  heating •Utilize a cistern  system to collect  stormwater runoff  to water the plants 8/18/2020 15 Location Location Advantages •Access to utilities •Access to parking •Access to bus  service •Access to  bathrooms/kitchen •Captive audience – existing health and  wellness programs MEMOR ANDUM - C OUNCIL WOR K SESSION DAT E:8/24/2020 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:N/A BY:Doran C ote, P ublic Works Director S UBJ EC T:T H 252/I-94 Update Recommendation: - R eceive report from M n D O T regarding the T H 252/I-94 F reeway C onversion update. Background: S taff fro m MnDO T will b e pres ent to disc uss with the C ity C ounc il the c urrent s tatus of the T H 252/I-94 F reeway C o nvers io n, the trans ition fro m an Environmental As s es s ment (E A) to an Enviro nmental Impac t S tatement (EI S ), a sc hedule update, the project goals and antic ipated or desired engagement efforts. Policy Issues: Are the project goals the correc t goals? W hat engagement efforts does the C ouncil des ire MnDO T to include in the process? S trategic Priorities and Values: Key Transportation Inves tments AT TAC HME N T S: Desc ription Upload Date Type P owerpoint 8/21/2020 P res entation Highway 252/I-94 Environmental Review Brooklyn Center City Council work session August 24, 2020 Agenda •Project update •Environmental Impact Statement  (EIS) Process & Schedule •Project Goals •Purpose & Need overview •TAC  Meetings & Council updates •Are the Project Goals correct? •What engagement efforts is the  Council interested in? 2 EIS Process 1. Establish purpose of the project & needs to be  addressed 2. Scoping Decision Document 3. Draft Environmental Impact Statement 4. Final Environmental Impact Statement/Record of  Decision 3 Current Schedule 4 Schedule subject to change Draft Goals •Improve safety, mobility, and bikeability/walkability  on & across Hwys 252 & 94  •Ensure solutions are consistent with local planning &  compatible with the existing  roadway network •Minimize the need to acquire additional property •Minimize social, environmental, and economic  impacts •Ensure impacts are balanced 8/21/2020 mndot.gov 5 Purpose & Need Statement –Overview  •Explains why an agency or agencies are  undertaking a project and the main objectives  of the project. •The “need”describes the transportation problems to  be addressed by the project.  •The “purpose”is a broad statement of the intended  transportation results of the project. •Helps decide where a project will begin and end by defining the “who, what, where, when and  why” of the transportation needs. 6 Draft Purpose & Need Statement –Project Purpose •“The purpose of the Highway 252/I‐94 Project is to improve vehicle safety  on Highway 252 between Highway 610 and I‐694; improve vehicle  mobility on Highway 252 and I‐94 between Highway 610 and downtown  Minneapolis; improve pedestrian and bicycle mobility across Highway  252; and address ADA deficiencies within MnDOT right of way along I‐94.”  (2019 EA) 7 8 Draft Project Needs TAC  Meetings & Council Updates 9 TAC  Meeting Anticipated Agenda City Council Updates August 2020 P&N and logical termini presented to TAC September 2020 TAC  provide comments to P & N & Logical  Termini Attend City Council mtgs to request input  on P&N and logical termini public  engagement October 2020 Present final P&N and logical termini Attend City council mtgs to present P&N  and logical termini November 2020 First TAC  SDD meeting. Review alternatives  considered under EA. Solicit additional  alternatives from TAC December 2020 Second SDD meeting. TAC  explains additional  alternatives to be developed Present previously developed  alternatives and solicit additional  alternatives for evaluation Are the Project Goals the correct goals? •Improve safety, mobility, and bikeability/walkability  on & across Hwys 252 & 94  •Ensure solutions are consistent with local planning &  compatible with the existing  roadway network •Minimize the need to acquire additional property •Minimize social, environmental, and economic  impacts •Ensure impacts are balanced 8/21/2020 mndot.gov 10 Anticipated Public Engagement Efforts 11Schedule subject to change Additional Discussion? 12 MEMOR ANDUM - C OUNCIL WOR K SESSION DAT E:8/24/2020 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:N/A BY:C urt Boganey, C ity Manager S UBJ EC T:P ending Items Recommendation: Housing P olicy - 9/2 C ity-wide S ewer Ac cess C harge P olic y - 9/14 C ouncil P olicy for C ity C harter requirement of Mayor's s ignature on all c ontracts - 9/14 Tobac co R egulations - 9/14 Beautific ation and P ublic Art S trategic P lans for years 2018-2020 and 2021-2023 C ouncil's R etreat F ollow up NO AH P res ervation P rogram R eview S pec ial As s es s ment P olic y Earle Brown name Vehic le Tow P olicy C itizen's R eview C ommittee O rganic R ec yc ling Background: