Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021 11-29 CCP SpecialCouncil Special M eeting V I RT UA L meeting being conducted by electronic means in accordance with Minnesota S tatutes, section 13D.021 P ublic portion available for connection via telephone Dial: 1-312-626- 6799 Meeting I D: 85315419931# Passcode: 112921# November 29, 2021 AGE NDA 1.Call to Order The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full City C ounc il packet is available to the public . The packet ring binder is loc ated at the entrance of the council chambers. 2.Roll Call 3.Agenda Items A.Continued discussion of Curfew Ordinance B.Continued discussion of 2022 Budget 4.Adjourn 1 BR291-4-763891.v2 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER EMERGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 2021-04 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE IMPOSING A CURFEW AND AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF THE CURFEW IF NEEDED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE I. Preamble. The City of Brooklyn Center (“City”) experienced civil unrest in the aftermath of the killing of Daunte Wright by police officer Kim Potter, who has since resigned from the City’s police department (“Former Officer”). While the vast majority of those who participated in the protests were peaceful, some took advantage of the situation to engage in a range of criminal activities, including damage to property and looting. The City Council reasonably anticipates the trial of the Former Officer will be occasioned by gatherings of citizens wishing to exercise their First Amendments rights regarding the trial and the outcome. The City is committed to protecting those expressions of free speech, while also protecting the safety of residents and their property within the City. The City determines, based on information provided by law enforcement and what has occurred in other communities during similar situations, there is a high probability there will be gatherings near the City’s police station, and perhaps other areas of the City, on the day the verdict is read. Such gatherings are anticipated regardless of the outcome of the trial. The City Council determines it is necessary to establish a curfew associated with the reading of the verdict in order to protect public health, safety, and welfare within the City. ARTICLE II. Legislative Findings. The Brooklyn Center City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: (a) The City Council is authorized by Section 3.06 of the City Charter to adopt emergency regulations to protect health, safety, and welfare within the City. (b) The trial for the Former Officer is scheduled to start on November 30, 2021. The City does not know how long the trial will last or when the verdict will be read. (c) It is reasonable for the City Council to anticipate that people will gather on the day the verdict is read, and potentially in the days that follow, to express their First Amendment rights regarding the trial and the verdict. (d) The City has already experienced how some people attempt to take advantage of such gatherings to foment social unrest that results in damage to property, threats to public safety, and other unlawful activities. One of the purposes of establishing a curfew is to avoid, or at least minimize, the types of harm caused to those living in the apartments across the street from the police department during the unrest that followed the killing of Daunte Wright. 2 BR291-4-763891.v2 (e) The City Council reasonably expects gatherings will occur on the day the verdict is read and determines it needs to act now to address the situation rather than waiting to call an emergency meeting on the day the verdict is read in an attempt to react to the situation that has already developed. (f) Deciding in advance to impose a curfew allows the City to prepare and, more importantly, allows those intending to gather to exercise their First Amendment rights to plan their activities accordingly. The City desires to avoid the public confusion that occurs when a curfew decision is not made until people have already gathered or shortly before the curfew is to go into effect. Such delay also undermines efforts to enforce the curfew and increases the potential for unwanted interactions between law enforcement and protesters. (g) While the City Council can anticipate gatherings on the night the verdict is read, it is more difficult to determine if, and for how long, those gatherings will continue. To avoid having to call and act in multiple emergency meetings to address such a potential, and in order to allow timely public notice, the City Council determines it is appropriate to authorize the City Manager to determine, based on the criteria set out in this Ordinance, whether to continue the curfew for additional nights. ARTICLE III. Curfew. Section 1. Imposed. A City-wide curfew for all persons within the City of Brooklyn Center shall be imposed on the day the verdict is read in the trial of the Former Officer. The curfew shall be in effect as of 9:30 p.m. and it shall extend until 6:00 a.m. the following day. Section 2. Exceptions. The curfew imposed by this Ordinance does not apply to individuals traveling directly to and from work or religious services, recognized members of community groups authorized by the City to be present at the site of civil unrest to defuse protesters, emergency services, law enforcement, people seeking medical care or fleeing danger, persons experiencing homelessness, or the news media. Section 3. Curfew Extended. (a) Authority to Extend. The City Manager is authorized to extend the curfew imposed by this Ordinance for up to four additional days if the City Manager determines, based on the criteria established herein, that the continuation of the curfew is necessary to protect public health, safety, or welfare. The curfew, if extended, shall be for the same period and have the same exceptions as the first day of the curfew. The City Manager shall separately evaluate the criteria each day the curfew may be imposed and, if the curfew is extended, the decision must be made and announced in time to provide the public notice required by this Ordinance. The City Manager shall immediately notify the City Council whether the curfew will be extended. If the City Manager determines not to extend the curfew, this Ordinance terminates on that day and cannot be relied upon to impose any additional curfews. 3 BR291-4-763891.v2 (a) Criteria to Extend. The City Manager shall consider the following criteria to determine whether to extend the curfew imposed by this Ordinance: (1) The gatherings associated with the verdict that occurred the previous night involved or resulted in: (i) Multiple incidences of criminal activity including, but not limited to, assault, theft, or property damage; and (ii) The City was required to rely on outside law enforcement agencies to respond to the activities arising out of the gatherings; (2) Based on all information reasonably available to the City, the City Manager determines it is probably the activities associated with the reading of the verdict that occurred the previous night will continue that night; and (3) The extension of the curfew is needed to protect public health, safety, and welfare. Section 4. Notice. The City shall provide public notice of the period of the curfew no later than 1:00 p.m. on the day the curfew will be in effect. The methods of providing notice shall include posting on the City’s website, sending messages on the City’s messaging platforms, and notifying the news outlets in the area. If the City does not become aware that the verdict will be read until after 1:00 p.m. on that day, the City shall provide notice as soon as it reasonably can upon learning the verdict will be read. Section 5. Enforcement. A violation of this Ordinance is a petty misdemeanor and is subject to a fine of $50. Section 6. Effect. This Ordinance shall be in effect on the day the verdict in the trial of the Former Officer is read and shall end either upon the decision by the City Manager not to extend the curfew, or four days after the reading of the verdict, whichever occurs first. The four-day extension period shall begin on the day following the reading of the verdict. Adopted this 22nd day of November, 2021 by a unanimous vote of the council members present. ____________________________ Mike Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ City Clerk Date of Publication December 2, 2021 BR291-413-763686.v7 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2021-____ CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION BUDGETING FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT THE DAUNTE WRIGHT AND KOBE DIMOCK-HEISLER COMMUNITY SAFETY AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION ACT AND PROVIDING FURTHER DIRECTION TO THE IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE WHEREAS, the City Council acted at its May 15, 2021 meeting to adopt Resolution No. 2021-73 establishing the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Act (“Safety Act”); and WHEREAS, the Safety Act directs the implementation of the Safety Act, including the creation of an Implementation Committee, Community Response Department, Traffic Enforcement Department, the Department of Community Safety and Violence Prevention, and the hiring of a Director to head the Department of Community Safety and Violence Prevention; and WHEREAS, the City has been working to implement the Safety Act, including partnering with FUSE to secure, at little to no cost to the City, two full-time fellows that started on November 1, 2021 and are working with the City to assist with its data collection and community outreach efforts related to implementing the Safety Act; and WHEREAS, the City has secured other grants to support its efforts and the implementation of the Safety Act; and WHEREAS, the City has received well-researched information regarding the costs of implementing the Safety Act and providing public safety services, including information from the ACLU attached hereto as Exhibit A and information on the City’s police budget considerations attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the City continues to seek financial assistance to implement the Safety Act, but it is necessary to allocate funds as part of the 2022 budget in order to continue the work to implement the Safety Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines as follows: (a) Kerner Commission recognized more than 50 years ago that the deep social and economic disparities that result from discrimination and racism must be addressed through massive investments to actually achieve public safety; (b) The City Council recognizes that its efforts at alternative response is important yet is still reactionary and recognizes that preventative action and investment in social support is proactive and necessary to attain true public safety and reduce the burden on or need for emergency response systems, including Food Deserts, Transportation within the City and BR291-413-763686.v7 access to current resources; political participation by marginalized communities; ways to enhance current services and remove barriers to access; and (c) Research has demonstrated programs that uplift, provide opportunities for health and meaningful skills building and education effectively decreases crime; and WHEREAS, allocating more funds than originally indicated in the proposed budget is necessary to carry out the City Council’s commitment to putting in place the measures set out in the Safety Act and for advancing its efforts to make the City a safer place to live and work for everyone; and WHEREAS, the City currently has more than $1,300,000 budgeted for positions that are currently vacant; and WHEREAS, the Implementation Committee is charged with the duty to develop and make recommendations to the City Council on the implementation of the Safety Act. In carrying out its work, it is important for the Implementation Committee to identify ways in which to build on existing resources within the community, collaborate with a wide range of partners, identify ways to ensure the continuity and sustainability of the programs it recommends, and to serve the needs of the whole individual; and WHEREAS, the City Council desire to provide further direction to the Implementation Committee to help ensure the Safety Act is implemented in a manner that is consistent with the City Council’s expectations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center as follows: 1. The City of Brooklyn Center’s proposed 2022 budget shall be revised to budget $1,220,000 from the general fund to the implementation of the Safety Act. The allocation of the budgeted amount shall include the following: Description 2022 Budget Amount Department of Community Safety and Violence Prevention $950,000 Community Programming and Supportive Programs $350,000 Traffic Enforcement Department and Pilot Study $270,000 Implementation Committee $150,000 Director of the Department of Community Safety and Violence Prevention Position $150,000 BR291-413-763686.v7 Sub Total $1,870,000 From Grants -$500,000 From CM Proposed Budget Line Item -$150,000 From Budget Unfilled Positions $1,220,000 2. The funds to be budgeted for Safety Act implementation under this Resolution shall, to the greatest extent possible, be transferred from funds allocated to current City staff vacancies, while ensuring the City maintains at least the current level of public services. 3. The City Manager is authorized and directed to revise the proposed 2022 budget to reflect the budget allocations contained within this Resolution and to take all other steps necessary to be able to present the revised budget at the public hearing scheduled for December 6, 2021, which may be continued to December 13, 2021 if needed. 4. The Implementation Committee, in performing its work as directed in the Safety Act, shall consider the range of issues that affect public safety including, but not limited to, the conditions that drive, contribute, and lead to public safety issues; a framework for social and economic justice policies and plans; youth and community programming in health, technology, financial, and education; tutoring and mentoring options focused on a whole-person approach to provide hope and critical crime prevention and healthy community supports; and a design for the City’s public safety departments that identifies and integrates systems to address the whole needs of the City’s residents in a comprehensive way. November 22, 2021 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. BR291-413-763686.v7 EXHIBIT A ACLU Budget Testimony Dated November 12, 2021 [attached hereto] Budget Testimony To:Brooklyn Center City Council and other City Officials From:ACLU of Minnesota and National ACLU Date:11/12/21 Subject:Budget Proposal, Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety Act Summary At the request of Mayor Mike Elliot, the ACLU is submitting this testimony providing suggestions regarding the City of Brooklyn Center ’s funding for the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety Resolution. We urge the Council to consider ways to adequately fund this visionary Act to ensure it is as impactful as Council Members intended . We suggest that Brooklyn Center commit at least $1.5m in the FY22-23 budget toward implementing the most important policy goals as a foundation to the Resolution. $1.5m is 7% of the City's overall budget1 and 15% of the City's overall policing budget.2 That amount is a significant first-year commitment that will both result in (1) immediate impacts for Brooklyn Center residents this year; and (2) allow BC to lay a strong foundation for the safe and successful implementation of the Resolution for years to come. One of the most famous quotes to come out of the uprisings and protests of the past year is that “Budgets are Moral Documents.” What a city values, prioritizes, and the direction it is headed can all be seen in the allocation of money and resources within its budgets.We strongly encourage all Brooklyn Center city officials to take the legal commitments they already passed in the Resolution seriously and to work to provide meaningful funding to build this far-sighted new model of public safety. The City Council — and the residents they represent — overwhelmingly supported the Resolution,3 and we’re confident you’ll now be equally committed to funding it. 3 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sYEkGfWIfeW0Q_bpjm0e8CTmDxJCIEEW/view 2 https://ccxmedia.org/news/brooklyn-center-approves-preliminary-budget-in-4-0-vote-mayor-elliott-abstains / 1 https://www.hometownsource.com/sun_post/news/government/brooklyn-center-approves-1-3-million-preli minary-budget-levy-increase-for-2022/article_87a30b74-2b6e-11ec-a20e-b71d4f4078fc.html 1 Funding Priorities: Policy Objectives Estimated Cost Policy Objective 1:Fully fund Community Response Department $823k Policy Objective 2:Funding for hiring a Director of Community Safety and Violence Prevention $150k Policy Objective 3:Funding for the Implementation Committee $150k Policy Objective 4:Funding for Community Programming and Supportive Programs $350k Policy Objective 5:Fund Traffic Enforcement Department Pilot Study $20,000 The ACLU recommends that Brooklyn Center focus on the following five priorities for year one funding: 1)Fully fund the new Community Response Department a)The Community Response Team will serve a range of functions. Specifically, it will provide critical and appropriate responses to situations that not only don’t require armed law enforcement, but are too often escalated by armed officers (including when a resident is primarily experiencing a medical, mental health, disability-related, or other behavioral or social need). b)The Community Response Team will work proactively with residents to offer supports such as conflict resolution and suicide prevention, as well as providing and connecting people with wrap-around services such as housing programs, substance treatment, etc. i)The Law Enforcement Action Partnership conducted a quantitative analysis that examined, among other factors, the population in Brooklyn Center and the cost of similar programs in cities like Denver, Colo., and 2 Eugene, Ore. LEAP estimated4 it would cost approximately $823,333 to fully fund the program (which would include 24/7 in-person responder teams with five teams of two), which is only 8% of the $9.6 million5 budget the city has allocated to the police department. 2)Hire a Director of the Community Safety Department a)In order to effectively and successfully implement the resolution, the City must budget for and hire a Director for the new Community Safety and Violence Prevention Department, which will contain the two existing public safety departments (fire and police) and the two new departments (traffic enforcement and community response). Hiring the Director is paramount as the city begins to develop, fund, and implement its new model of public safety. 3)Fund the Implementation Committee a)The implementation committee is responsible for drafting any and all amendments, ordinances, resolutions, policies, guidelines or other recommendations for review, adoption, and/or implementation by City Council or City Staff. It’s necessary to provide stipends to the residents and experts who will sit on the committee and provide any additional resources the committee may need (e.g. for research, data analysis, community outreach, etc.) in order for the implementation to move forward in a timely and effective manner. 4)Provide Community Programs, Resources a)Community-based, life-affirming, and supportive services such as housing,health care,jobs programs,education,after-school programs,environmental design, and violence interruption programs have all been proven to disrupt and reduce violence. It’s imperative the City provide the Brooklyn Center community these resources via community programming that residents need not only to survive but thrive. i)In particular, this funding should go to aiding the residents of Humboldt Court and Stirling Square - for example, for youth programming, job training, senior care services, and improving infrastructure and community environments. (1)This is to help address the issues of those (in Humboldt and Stirling apartments) most affected by the Protests earlier this spring. 5)Conduct a Civilian Traffic Enforcement Pilot Study a)The resolution is ambitious and groundbreaking, and it’s already provided an exciting opportunity for Brooklyn Center to serve as a model for the state and 5 https://www.hometownsource.com/sun_post/news/government/brooklyn-center-approves-1-3-million-preli minary-budget-levy-increase-for-2022/article_87a30b74-2b6e-11ec-a20e-b71d4f4078fc.html&sa=D&sour ce=docs&ust=1636581687365000&usg=AOvVaw1lW8K-MDnORyidUVewc2Jt 4 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10TXiTKlnk48xtcIxhe2BXcbvyBDMKthHaGg9A0vOn5Q/edit 3 nation. This multi-year effort will require studies and research. While cities across the country are working on deploying civilian traffic enforcement teams, most are still in the pilot phase, so there’s limited data. In order to develop and build this department in Brooklyn Center, the City should first fund a pilot study that will allow it to appropriately and accurately allocate money to fully fund this new department. Suggested Budget Model 1)Maintain current staffing level of Police Department a)Transfer the previously allocated money for hiring more police to funding the aforementioned policy priorities b)City would then be able to divert approximately $1.5 million toward resolution implementation Since the Resolution explicitly requires the city to fully implement6 all of the components of the resolution, it is incumbent that city officials work together this budget cycle to analyze the current city and Police Department budget and determine where the best sources of funding should come from. Since the majority of police funding comes from personnel costs, specifically salaries and benefits, the best way to find additional funding is by simply not hiring for the numerous open positions that exist and have been budgeted for. The figure below illustrates the difference in the breakdown of the current 2022 budget and our suggested model, which includes diverting approximately $1.5 million toward the varying programs, services, and departments outlined in the resolution.( Graphic Below) 6 http://www.mediaaccess.info/brooklyncenter/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Community-Safety-and-Violenc e-Prevention-Resolution.pdf 4 Budget Considerations 1.As alternative programs, specifically the community response and traffic enforcement departments, begin to function at full capacity,police officers will be asked to respond to fewer incidents, thus decreasing the need for such high police staffing and funding. 2.Based on data from other cities that have implemented similar models,these alternative programs could save the city thousands or potentially millions in ambulance and emergency hospitalization costs alone.7 3.Increased police budgets do not correlate to safer communities8 and have no connection to rates of violence9 4.However, inadequate social service funding increases rates of violence10 10 https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/10/e016379 9 https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/06/07/over-past-60-years-more-spending-police-hasnt-nec essarily-meant-less-crime/ 8 https://www.thedailybeast.com/fentanyl-guns-and-murder-mean-you-should-get-ready-for-a-bloody-summ er 7 https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2020-06-12/portland-eugene-defund-police-alternative 5 Conclusion The Brooklyn Center City Council passed the Daunte and Kobe resolution and now has the responsibility and the opportunity to ensure this resolution is fully realized. To make this resolution as successful as possible, the ACLU of MN and ACLU National recommend: ●Brooklyn Center officials commit at least $1.5m in the FY22-23 budget toward funding the Community Safety Act ●Ensure the five policy goals outlined above are deemed funding priorities that include, but are not limited to, repurposing money from currently vacant Full-Time Employees in the Police Department ●Council Members, staff or community members in need of a more comprehensive budget analysis should instruct the City Manager or any other proper authority in charge of budgetary functions to provide more information and analysis on all possible options. The ACLU looks forward to continuing its work with the Council and community on implementation of the resolution. We would be happy to submit additional testimony at the request of Council and/or as additional budgetary and fiscal estimate data become available. The Resolution and the public support behind it (as shown in this poll11) indicates a clear mandate for the Council to act and follow through on their past commitments to the people of Brooklyn Center to make all residents safe. Thank you, ACLU of Minnesota National ACLU 11 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sYEkGfWIfeW0Q_bpjm0e8CTmDxJCIEEW/view 6 BR291-413-763686.v7 EXHIBIT B Brooklyn Center Policing Budget Considerations [attached hereto] 11/22/2021 1 2022 Annual Preliminary Budget Continued Public Safety Discussion October 8, 2018 Review City Council November 22, 2021 Dr. Reggie Edwards, City Manager Presentation Purpose •Introduction •Need •Strategies To  Meet Need •Police Cost •Police Service Impact •2022 Fiscal Direction •Questions 2 11/22/2021 2 Introduction Expertise •Lived Experience •Educated and Trained Experience •Professional Management Experience 3 The Need (Beyond Brooklyn Center) •Eliminate Systemic Racism •Eliminate Inequalities •Prevent the Lose of Life by Police •Shift of Mindset, Structures, Patterns of Behavior Related to  Systemic Racism and Inequalities •Build Community Trust  Particularly Those Historically  Marginalized •Feel of Safe and Protected 4 11/22/2021 3 Strategies Proposed To Address Need Public Safety Act (Patterns of Behavior and Structure Change) •Unarmed Personnel Non‐Motorize Traffic  Offenses •Community Response –Unarmed Mental Health and Social Worker  Practioners Address  911 Calls for Mental Health, Social and Medical. •Citation and Summons Instead of Arrest for Some Misdemeanor Offenses •Personal Scenario City Efforts Underway (Patterns of Behavior, Structure and Mindset Change) •Public Health (i.e. Health on the Go, Mental Health, and Embedded Social Worker) •Prevention ‐Youth  Health Violence Prevention •Fire Department –Medical 911 Calls •Community Transformational Change Innovation Process (Evolving Brooklyn  Center – 2022 Year) 5 Police Services Cost October 8, 2018 Review 11/22/2021 4 Cost of Policing in Brooklyn Center 7 Met Council 2019 City Est. Population PD Expenses General Fund Exp. Ratio Source Shoreview 26,695 2,479,250.00 11,965,378.00 20.72%2020 final Golden Valley 22,715 6,732,035.00 23,532,695.00 28.61%2021 adopted Crystal 23,262 6,742,843.00 17,303,181.00 38.97%2021 adopted Richfield 36,993 10,926,920.00 27,868,330.00 39.21%2022 proposed Fridley 29,374 7,414,180.00 18,564,290.00 39.94%2021 adopted Brooklyn Center 32,722 9,986,134.00 24,822,696.00 40.23%2022 proposed White Bear Lake 25,362 5,002,617.00 12,115,591.00 41.29%2021 budget New Hope 22,376 7,113,886.00 15,936,977.00 44.64%2021 adopted Maplewood 41,738 10,413,750.00 22,673,770.00 45.93%2021 adopted Roseville 36,644 8,811,445.00 18,022,285.00 48.89%2021 adopted PD Represent Approx.  9‐10% of $100M Total   City Budget Cost of Policing in Brooklyn Center 8 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% Shoreview Golden Valley Crystal Richfield Fridley Brooklyn Center White Bear Lake New Hope Maplewood Roseville Ratio Brooklyn Center 40.23%  of General Fund or Rank  6th Among Ten   Comparable Cities (2021  Budgets) 11/22/2021 5 Police Services Impact October 8, 2018 Review Rate of Violent Crime per 100,000 people 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Brooklyn Center PD Brooklyn Park PD Champlin PD Columbia Heights PD Crystal PD Fridley PD New Hope PD St Louis Park PD 2018 2019 2020 * Violent Crime includes: Murder, Rape, Robbery and Aggravated Assault 11/22/2021 6 Rate of Property Crime per 100,000 people 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Brooklyn Center PD Brooklyn Park PD Champlin PD Columbia Heights PD Crystal PD Fridley PD New Hope PD St Louis Park PD 2018 2019 2020 * Property Crime includes: Burglary, Larceny, Auto Theft, Arson and Human Trafficking Rate of Part 2 Crime per 100,000 people 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Brooklyn Center PD Brooklyn Park PD Champlin PD Columbia Heights PD Crystal PD Fridley PD New Hope PD St Louis Park PD 2018 2019 2020 * Part 2 Crime includes: Other Assaults, Forgery, Embezzlement, Stolen Property, Vandalism,  Weapons, Prostitution, Other sex offenses, Narcotics, Gambling, Family offenses, DUI, Liquor  Laws, Disorderly Conduct and Other offenses (excluding traffic) 11/22/2021 7 BC Community Survey 2012 What do you think is the  most serious issue facing   Brooklyn Center today? 13 BC Community Survey 2017 What do you think is the  most serious issue facing   Brooklyn Center today? •DON’T KNOW/REFUSED......7% •NOTHING................16% •LACK OF JOBS...........11% •LACK OF BUSINESSES......9% •CRIME..................22% •FORECLOSURES............7% •HIGH TAXES..............8% •DIVERSITY...............6% •RUNDOWN PROPERTIES......6% •LOW INCOME HOUSING......7% •SCATTERED...............2% 14 11/22/2021 8 Community Survey 2008 - 2012 15 Community Survey 2017 16 11/22/2021 9 Police Department Budgeted Unfilled Positions 14 Positions $1,303,284 17 18 11/22/2021 10 19 Policing Service Implications •What don’t we get with the current level of 34 police officers: •No community engagement •Reduction in proactive law enforcement, including traffic stops (motorized or moving) and response related to crime trends. •Patrol minimums vary throughout the day as calls for service increase and decrease. In summary, having 20  patrol officers would affect the schedule by forcing us to consistently be at minimum staffing until that  changes. It would be extremely challenging to train, allow for vacation, and officer wellness programs would  have to be suspended. There are always sick calls and this would have to be filled with overtime call‐backs  and forced overtime. •Having four sergeants would mean time periods with no patrol supervision. There are four rotating 12 hour  shifts (two days and two nights) –if one shift is working the other shift is off. If one sergeant takes the day off,  has training, or is sick, we will have no supervision.  •The Street Crimes Unit is the group of officers dedicated to be law enforcement liaisons with business owners  and hotel managers. Without SCU there will be no proactive law enforcement liaisons in the business areas.  •Comparing the wages (savings) of a police officer to taking parking complaints, responding to abandoned  vehicles and similar calls for service as the previous presenter did very is misleading. The police department  doesn’t send police officers to those calls, but Community Service Officers (CSOs) who are unarmed, part‐ time staff with an average wage of $19/hour and non‐benefit earning.  20 11/22/2021 11 Policing Service Implications Pre April 11, 2021 •Calls for  service were holding for  an average of 9 minutes 50 seconds. •Average response times to the calls for service were 9 minutes 52 seconds. As of September 1, 2021 •Calls for  service were holding for  an average of 17 minutes 58 seconds. •Average response times to the calls for service were 10 minutes 47  seconds. •The data above reflects an 83% increase for holding time and almost a 10%  increase for response time. The comparison data is from 2 months ago. •Calls are not 1:1, police must respond to certain calls, and the type of call such  as violent crime require multiple police respondents. 21 2022 Fiscal Direction October 8, 2018 Review 11/22/2021 12 Brooklyn Center Vision and Mission Vision Statement ‐We  envision Brooklyn Center as a thriving,  diverse community with a full range  of housing, business, cultural  and recreational offerings. It is a safe and inclusive place that  people of all ages love to call home, and visitors enjoy due to its  convenient location and commitment to a healthy environment. Mission Statement ‐The mission of the City of Brooklyn Center is  to ensure an attractive, clean, safe, and inclusive community that  enhances the quality of life for  all people and preserves the public  trust. 23 Brooklyn Center Strategic Priorities •Enhanced Community Image  •Resident Economic Stability  •Inclusive Community Engagement •Targeted  Redevelopment •Key  Transportation Investments 24 11/22/2021 13 2022 City Budget Priorities •Equitable Operations‐Enterprise  Wide •Innovation‐Enterprise Wide •Public Health‐Community  •Tax  Burden Relief •Beautification and Cleanliness‐ Community  •Economic Stability‐Businesses  •Economic Stability‐Residents •Engagement‐Enterprise Wide 25 26 City Council Police  Department Residents Fire Department  Office of  Inclusion, Equity  and Diversity City  Manager Department of  Administration Public Works   Department Department of  Community  Development Office of  Prevention,  Health & Safety Department of  Financial  Services e Advisory Committee 11/22/2021 14 Office of Community Prevention, Health and Safety Mission –To provide leadership, programming,  coordination and evaluation of prevention, health  and safety across the enterprise and in the  community.  Coordination of efforts within the  enterprise shall focus principally on all public safety  related departments. 27 Functions  •Prevention, Health and Community Safety Program  management and coordination •Civilian Traffic  Enforcement Division –Unarmed civilian  personnel response to non‐moving (motor not running)  traffic violations. •Community Response Division ‐Community mental health  911 and community health response . 28 11/22/2021 15 Department Budget Highlights •Initial start with coordination across the enterprise •Pilot civilian traffic response grant funded for  two years •Pilot mental health 911 calls and community response  grant funded for two years •Initiate data analysis and communication 29 30 Cities Population (2020  Census) Persons Below  Poverty Level (2015‐ 2019 ACS) Per Capita Income  (2019 dollars)  Median Housing Value   (2019 Dollars)  Champlin 23,919 5.00% $ 40,600.00 $ 237,800.00  Crystal 23,330 7.60% $ 33,800.00 $ 197,300.00  Fridley 29,590 9.60% $ 31,600.00 $ 198,200.00  Golden Valley 22,552 6.10% $ 57,600.00 $ 304,700.00  Maplewood 42,088 8.60% $ 33,800.00 $ 217,300.00  New Hope 21,986 10.00% $ 32,800.00 $ 225,100.00  Roseville 36,254 8.90% $ 38,700.00 $ 254,200.00  Shoreview 26,921 4.00% $ 48,800.00 $ 275,800.00  White Bear 24,883 5.70% $ 71,700.00 $ 226,000.00  Brooklyn Center 33,782 15.10% $ 24,900.00 $ 172,800.00  Brooklyn Park 86,478 8.40% $ 31,900.00 $ 224,300.00  11/22/2021 16 Department Budget by Program 31 Function 2022 2023 Office Manager and operations $154,850 $154,850 Pilot civilian traffic response grant funded $250,000 $250,000 Pilot mental health 911 calls and community  response grant funded $250,000 $250,000 Community Transformational Change Innovation Process (Evolving Brooklyn Center) $225,000 $225,000 Total  $879,850 $879,850 City Related 2022 –2023 Budget  32 Action 2022 2023 Implementation Committee Project Manager 80,000 FUSE Fellows 300,000 Office space Implementation Project Mgr./FUSE Fellows 10,000 Office of Prevention (i.e. Community Response Pilot, Traffic   Enforcement Pilot and Community Transformational Change  Innovation) $879,850 $879,850 Cities United –Youth Gun Violence Prevention 30,000 30,000 New Health Focus Embedded in Recreation Department 50,0000 50,000 Office of Inclusion, Equity and Antiracism 150,000 150,000 Total  Investment $1,499,850 $1,109,850 $2,609,700 Two  Year   Investment 11/22/2021 17 2022 Proposed Budget Highlights •Create Office •Pilot Efforts •Combine Mental Health Models •Maintain Public Safety  •Transformational Change •Fiscally Responsible and within the Means of the City 33 The preliminary budget is based on hearing the Council articulate a need  for policing service need, public health and well‐being and crime  prevention priorities. The preliminary budget is based on strategies to address these multi‐ variate and dynamic priorities without diminishing the quality of service  delivery.  The preliminary budget is based upon seeking innovative strategies to  address the needs articulated by the Council in an innovative, cost efficient  and service outcome effective manner. 34 2022 Proposed Budget Highlights 11/22/2021 18 Questions ? 35