Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-13-23 CCPCouncil Study Session City Hall Council Chambers November 13, 2023 AGE NDA 1.City Council Discussion of Agenda Items and Questions - 6 p.m. 2.M iscellaneous 3.Discussion of Work S ession Agenda Item as T ime P ermits 4.Adjourn C IT Y C O UNC IL M E E T I NG City Hall Council Chambers November 13, 2023 AGE NDA 1.Informal Open Forum with City Council - 6:45 p.m. This is an opportunity for the public to address the City Council on items that are not on the agenda. It is limited to 15 minutes. It may no t be used to make personal attacks, air personality grievances, make political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with the presenter. Questions fro m the Council will be for clarificatio n purposes only. It will not be used as a time fo r proble m-solving or reacting to the comments made but for hearing the presenter for informational purposes only. The first call will be for those that have notified the Clerk that they would like to speak during the open forum and then ask if any one connec ted to this meeting would like to speak. W hen called upon, please indicate your name and then proceed. Please be sure to state your name before speaking. 2.Invocation - Butler - 7 p.m. 3.Call to Order Regular Business M eeting Attendees please turn o ff cell phones and pages during the meeting. A copy of the full me e ting packet is available in the binder at the entrance to the Council Chambers. 4.Roll Call 5.P ledge of Allegiance 6.Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda These items are considered to be routine by the C ity Council and will be enacted by one motion. There isn't a separate discussion for these items unless a Counc ilmember so requests, then it is moved to the end of the Council Consideration I tems. a.Approval of Minutes - Motion to approve the following meetings: 10/23/23 Study Session 10/23/23 Regular Session b.Approval of L icenses - Motion to approve the licenses as presented. c.Resolution regarding P lanning Commission Application No. 2023-006, Submitted by AW C Holdings L L C, for Conversion of an E xisting Two-Tenant Building to an Approximately 10,200-Square Foot Restaurant and B ar (Nightclub) and 704-S quare F oot Outdoor Patio (5927 J ohn Martin Drive) (i) Motion to adopt a resoluti on regarding Planning Commission Application No. 2023-006, submitted by AWC Holdings L L C, for approval of a variance for a 59-space parking defi ciency and conditional use permit that would all ow for the conversion of an existing two-tenant building to an approximately 10,200-square foot restaurant and bar (nightclub) with 704- square foot outdoor pati o at 5927 John Marti n Drive, based on the submitted findings fact, and as amended by the conditions of approval in the resolution. d.Resolution Declaring November 25, 2023, as S mall Business Saturday in the City of Brooklyn Center - Motion to approve a resolution declaring November 25, 2023, as Small Business Saturday in Brooklyn Center. e.Resolution Establishing 2024 S treet and Storm Drainage S pecial Assessment Rates - Motion to approve a resolution establ ishing the 2024 street and storm drainage special assessment rates for street and utility improvement projects. f.Resolution Establishing I nterest Rate for 2024 S pecial A ssessments - Motion to approve a resolution establishing i nterest rate for 2024 special assessments. g.Resolution Declaring Costs to be A ssessed and Calling for a P ublic Hearing on Proposed Special Assessments for I mprovement Project No. 2024-01, Orchard L ane East I mprovements - Moti on to approve a resolution declaring costs to be assessed and calling for a public hearing on proposed speci al assessments for Improvement Project No. 2024-01, Orchard Lane East Improvements. 7.P resentations/Proclamations/Recognitions/Donations a.2024 Random Acts of Kindness City Council Presentation 2024 P resentation recognizing nominators and nominees of Random Acts of Kindness. Council Members can take turns reading the nominations. 8.P ublic Hearings 9.P lanning Commission Items a.Planning Commission A pplication No. 2023-007, Submitted by 7100 Brooklyn Blvd L L C, for Conversion of a Former Credit Union and Office Building into a 17-Unit Multi-Family Residential Building and Related I mprovements (7100 Brooklyn B oulevard) City C ouncil is being asked to consider two alternatives regarding Planning Commission A pplication No. 2023-007: 1 . Approval of S ite and Building P lan (M ajor Amendment) for 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard Motion to direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the site and building plan (major amendment) as outlined in P lanning C ommission Application No. 2023-007, which would convert a former credit union and office building to a 17-unit multi-family residential building, subject to the outlined conditions of approval. 2 . Approval of S ite and Building P lan (M ajor Amendment) for 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard Motion to direct staf f to prepare a resolution denying the site and building plan (major amendment) as outlined in P lanning C ommission A pplication No. 2023- 007 with outlined findings of fact. 10.Council Consideration Items a.F ollow Up from S pecial A ssessment Hearing for Proposed Special Assessments for A dministrative Fines/Citation Costs - Motion to approve a resolution reducing the certified special assessments for certain properties for administrative fines and citation cost from the Hennepin County Tax Rolls b.Resolution A pproving the Grant A dministration Policy Motion to approve a resolution adopting the Grant Administration Policy located in the City Code of Policies; Financial Policies Section 2.25 11.Council Report 12.Adjournment C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:11/13/2023 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :N/A BY:Barb S uciu, A ssistant City Manager/C ity C lerk S U B J E C T:A pproval of Minutes Requested Council A con: - Moon to approve the following meengs: 10/23/23 S tudy S ession 10/23/23 Regular S ession B ackground: I n accordance with M innesota S tate S tatute 15.17, the official records of all mee5ngs must be documented and approved by the governing body. B udget I ssues: I nclusive C ommunity Engagement: A nracist/Equity Policy Effect: AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip5on U pload D ate Type 10.23 S tudy S es s ion 11/7/2023 Backup M aterial 10.23 Regular S ession 11/7/2023 Backup M aterial 10/23/23 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION OCTOBER 23, 2023 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session called to order by Mayor April Graves at 6:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor April Graves, Councilmembers Marquita Butler, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, Dan Jerzak, and Teneshia Kragness. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards, Director of Fiscal and Support Services Angela Holm, Director of Public Works Elizabeth Heyman, Community Development Director Jesse Anderson, Planner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh, Police Chief Kellace McDaniel, Director of Community Prevention, Health and Safety LaToya Turk, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk Barb Suciu, and City Attorney Jason Hill. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF AGENDA ITEMS AND QUESTIONS Councilmember Jerzak inquired about the discussion of the proposed Public Safety Act Meeting dates prior to the proposed resolution adoption of the traffic stop and consent search policies. Mayor Graves noted that the dates are focused on the permanent advisory committee rather than the resolution. Councilmember Jerzak noted that he believes there was a misunderstanding as it was his impression the resolution would be reviewed before discussing the passing of it. Mayor Graves stated she didn’t believe it was the best use of time to go over the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety & Violence Prevention Act line by line. Some of the items have already been implemented. The fifth item from the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety & Violence Prevention Act has not been implemented, so staff has put together recommendations based on the recommendations of the Implementation Committee regarding traffic stop and consent search policies. Councilmember Jerzak noted his understanding was the Council needed to discuss the second item as well. Mayor Graves stated there could be more discussion on the second item of the Act, but it won’t change the recommendations the Council has already received. 10/23/23 -2- DRAFT Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she hasn’t received a document from the League of Minnesota Cities and the City Attorney to ensure Brooklyn Center is in compliance with everything. She pointed out she was also under the impression the Council would meet with the Implementation Committee before voting on anything. Also, the Council hasn’t heard anything from the Police Chief on the traffic stops and consent searches. Mayor Graves stated Police Chief Kellace McDaniel presented on consent searches and traffic stops with Director of Community Prevention, Health and Safety LaToya Turk a few months ago, which accounted for the staff presentation. Dr. Edwards confirmed staff was instructed to return to Council with a policy reflecting the staff recommendations made during the presentation by Chief McDaniel and Ms. Turk, which is Council Consideration Item 10. Resolution Directing the Adoption of Traffic Stop and Consent Search Policies for the Brooklyn Center Police Department on the Regular Session agenda. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson requested the two policies be separated for voting consideration. Mayor Graves asked Dr. Edwards why the policies were in one motion when it was the recommendation of staff to have two separate policies. Dr. Edwards stated there are two separate policies, but there is one resolution to adopt the two policies. Mayor Graves asked if the Council only wanted to approve one of the policies. Dr. Edwards stated the resolution can be separated if that is the preference of the Council. Councilmember Jerzak pointed out that the Council isn’t allowed to talk about the settlement related to the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety & Violence Prevention Act. He asked how that can be reconciled with the policies. Dr. Edwards stated the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety & Violence Prevention Act came before the settlement, so the settlement is not the final decider on the outcome of the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety & Violence Prevention Act. There are separate decisions made for each document. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson noted the Council hasn’t discussed the consent search and traffic stops as a body. Mayor Graves stated they discussed the topic after the staff presentation. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated there are some aspects of each policy she is uncomfortable with. Mayor Graves stated the Council can discuss the policies after the presentation on the agenda. Mayor Graves explained the Council has received a presentation from the Implementation Committee and had a discussion, received a presentation from staff and had a discussion, and will receive another staff presentation. Also, each Councilmember has had the opportunity to review the policies and meet with Staff on their own time. 10/23/23 -3- DRAFT Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson pointed out that two members of the Council didn’t vote on the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety & Violence Prevention Act originally and have requested to review the document. Mayor Graves asked why the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety & Violence Prevention Act is more important than the subsequent policies. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated the policies are a product of the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock- Heisler Community Safety & Violence Prevention Act. The traffic stops and consent searches are part of the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety & Violence Prevention Act, and all stakeholders need to be in consensus. Mayor Graves stated Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson could make a motion to remove the item from the agenda if she wished. Councilmember Jerzak stated not all parties have had everyone at the table and had a robust discussion. There needs to be consensus in order for there to be buy-in. It is unsettling to be forced into a vote that he is uncomfortable with. Mayor Graves stated she thought the Council was ready to vote on it. She asked who else the Council wants to hear from. Councilmember Jerzak stated he wants to hear from law enforcement about any hesitations they have, particularly from the Police Chief. Dr. Edwards pointed out Chief Kellace will be presenting Council Consideration Item 10. Resolution Directing the Adoption of Traffic Stop and Consent Search Policies for the Brooklyn Center Police Department on the Regular Session agenda. Mayor Graves stated the item about the traffic stops and consent searches is on the agenda, and it is the policy that public commenters don’t comment on Council Consideration Items from the agenda. She asked the Council for their opinion on waiving the policy for the evening. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she isn’t opposed to public comment as long as there are time restrictions. She noted her preference for removing the item from the agenda due to the lengthy agenda. Councilmember Jerzak noted his agreement with Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson. Council Consideration Item 10. Resolution Directing the Adoption of Traffic Stop and Consent Search Policies for the Brooklyn Center Police Department on the Regular Session agenda deserves robust discussion. Councilmembers Butler and Kragness agreed they were open to public comment on the item. Councilmember Kragness added she would have liked more information on Council Consideration Item 10. Resolution Directing the Adoption of Traffic Stop and Consent Search Policies for the Brooklyn Center Police Department on the Regular Session agenda and would like to hear directly 10/23/23 -4- DRAFT from the Police Chief. As it stands, she is not comfortable voting on the item with the current information available to her. Mayor Graves pointed out the staff recommendations have been reviewed and approved by the Police Chief. Councilmember Kragness stated she hasn’t heard directly from the Police Chief , although he did co-present previously. Mayor Graves stated she wants to keep the item on the agenda as it is the same set of staff recommendations just in policy form. The Police Chief has already presented the item, and the Council has already had opportunities to ask questions of the Police Chief, both at the aforementioned presentation and outside of Council meetings. She asked what questions remain unanswered for the rest of the Council. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated the Council has not discussed the different types of traffic stops nor the conflicting language with the settlement the Council is unable to openly discuss. Mayor Graves pointed out, as did Dr. Edwards, that the settlement is separate from the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety & Violence Prevention Act. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she has read the settlement and understands its differences from the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety & Violence Prevention Act. However, the language used in the proposed policies is different from the language used in the settlement. Councilmember Jerzak stated he wants to hear directly from the Chief that police officers have provided input into the policies and are committed to the process. He wants to hear the information from Chief Kellace alone without a co-presenter. Councilmember Jerzak stated he wants the policies to pass, but he cannot make a well-informed decision without hearing the potential concerns of the parties who will enforce the policies. Mayor Graves asked if the Council could table the item after the planned presentation. City Attorney Jason Hill confirmed the item can be tabled after the presentation and prior to any vote approving or opposing the item. Mayor Graves noted it was the consensus of the Council to allow public comment regarding Council Consideration Item 10. Resolution Directing the Adoption of Traffic Stop and Consent Search Policies for the Brooklyn Center Police Department. She stated the public comment period would begin at 6:30 p.m. to allow for more commenters. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Graves called for a brief recess prior to the Regular Meeting. Hearing no objection, Mayor Graves adjourned the Study Session at 6:26 p.m. 10/23/23 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION OCTOBER 23, 2023 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor April Graves at 6:33 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor April Graves, Councilmembers Marquita Butler, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, Dan Jerzak, and Teneshia Kragness. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards, Director of Fiscal and Support Services Angela Holm, Director of Public Works Elizabeth Heyman, Community Development Director Jesse Anderson, Planner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh, Police Chief Kellace McDaniel, Director of Community Prevention, Health and Safety LaToya Turk, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk Barb Suciu, and City Attorney Jason Hill. Mayor April Graves opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum. Lori B. stated research has shown consent searches are not beneficial. She explained her two sons are of driving age and have similar demographics as Duante Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler. Complying with law enforcement doesn’t ensure safety for people of color. She read a poem about taking other people’s perspectives into consideration and violence against people of color, particularly at the hands of law enforcement. Amity D. thanked the Council for allowing for comments on traffic stops and consent searches. A majority of people supported the initial passing of the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety & Violence Prevention Act. People from all over applauded Brooklyn Center and its efforts. In the time since then, many parties have wasted their time and been met with barriers by the City. The Council cannot say they don’t have enough information after two years of discussions and presentations. She encouraged the Council to approve the proposed policies as the City cannot continue to shut down the Dimock family, the Wright family, and the Brooklyn Center community. John T. noted his best friend Philando Castille was murdered in 2016 by law enforcement, and there was a community response asking for change. However, the same things keep happening even in 2021 with Duante Wright. Kim Potter has already gotten out of jail, but the City hasn’t 10/23/23 -2- DRAFT made any significant changes. He addressed Councilmembers Lawrence-Anderson and Jerzak and noted he remembered who pointed out Emmett Till and who hung him. Katie W. pointed out she was optimistic coming into the meeting. However, the discussion by the Council during the Study Session was discouraging. The Implementation Committee did an immense amount of work and research in recent years. They have answered every question asked of them while maintaining their own full-time jobs and lives. Even the new Councilmembers cannot claim they don’t know what’s going on in the community. Katie W. listed a number of people of color who have been murdered by law enforcement during traffic stops. She stated that there should be more than enough information for the Council to make a change. Toshira G. shared a story of a loved one’s experience with St. Paul law enforcement in 2009. The person is a man of color named Justin Teigen who was brutally beaten by law enforcement and found in a dumpster. Katie Wright and Amity Dimock lost their sons but still dedicated time to the Implementation Committee and making changes in the community. She called for the Council and Staff to consider the Black men of color in each of their lives that could be the next Duante Wright or Kobe Dimock-Heisler. Michelle G. introduced herself as the president of Communities United Against Police Brutality and stated the organization sent a letter to the Council . She noted it is difficult to follow up such emotional commentary, but she would stick to policy recommendations. As for the consent search policy proposal, it must be noted that asking for a consent search means that there isn’t probable cause. However, law enforcement is not on equal footing as the people they are asking consent from, which doesn’t make it legitimate consent. Michelle G. pointed out Brooklyn Center Police Department is the deadliest law enforcement entity in the State based on its size. The Minnesota Department of Human Rights decree with Minneapolis bans consent searches. The consent decree also bans equipment stops entirely. Zoe C. noted she has been stopped for driving while Black multiple times. Her car is tinted and is stopped regularly for that as well. It is insulting to see Brooklyn Center moving backward rather than forward. She added the police need to be educated on how to interact with people of color rather than the other way around. Julie B. explained when she applied to be part of the Implementation Committee, she had no idea how long the process would take. It took extensive research, collaboration, time, and discussions to develop a response everyone could be supportive of. Councilmember Butler returned to the meeting at 7:00 p.m. Julie B. pointed out everyone wants to be safe in the community. One way to do that is to decrease interactions between law enforcement and the public, particularly with traffic stops. The Implementation Committee has worked diligently with law enforcement and other staff to create 10/23/23 -3- DRAFT a shared concept to move forward with related to traffic stops and consent searches. Chief McDaniel has previously expressed concerns with certain recommendations made by the Implementation Committee, but those have been removed. Chief Kellace McDaniel is in full support of the proposed policies. Julie B. added community members have shown their concern for public safety time and time again. She implored the Council to approve the policies to promote community safety. The decision process isn’t an easy one, but the Council has the responsibility to show up for what is right and do better. Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to close the Informal Open Forum at 7:02 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 2. INVOCATION Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson shared a quote from William Faulkner, “Never be afraid to raise your voice for honesty and truth and compassion against injustice and lying and greed. If people all over the world would do this, it would change the earth.” 3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session called to order by Mayor April Graves at 7:02 p.m. 4. ROLL CALL Mayor April Graves, Councilmembers Marquita Butler Kris Lawrence-Anderson, Dan Jerzak, and Teneshia Kragness. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards, Director of Fiscal and Support Services Angela Holm, Director of Public Works Elizabeth Heyman, Community Development Director Jesse Anderson, Planner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh, Police Chief Kellace McDaniel, Director of Community Prevention, Health and Safety LaToya Turk, Assistant City Manager and City Clerk Barb Suciu, and City Attorney Jason Hill. 5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Kragness moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda, and the following consent items were approved: 10/23/23 -4- DRAFT 6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. October 9, 2023 – Study Session 2. October 9, 2023 – Regular Session 3. October 9, 2023 – Work Session 6b. LICENSES MECHANICAL Season Control Mechanical Division, Inc. 6225 Cambridge St. #29, St. Louis Park 55416 RENTAL INITIAL (TYPE IV – six-month license) 6220 France Avenue N Ewing Square Acquisition Partners, LP INITIAL (TYPE II – two-year license) 7218 Oliver Avenue N Na Vang RENEWAL (TYPE IV – six-month license) 5112 70th Avenue N Ih3 Property Minnesota Lp 6225 Unity Avenue N HPA CL2 LLC 6749 Humboldt Avenue N Patrick Nguyen RENEWAL (TYPE III – one-year license) 201 65th Avenue N Riverwood LLC 6331 Beard Avenue N Ccfi Holdings Llc 6915 Humboldt Avenue N Lynwood Pointe Llc 3312 64th Avenue N Buildup Assets 64th Ave Llc 3800 Burquest Lane HENNEPIN RP FUNDING LLC 3906 Janet Lane E Anderson & K Knoepke 5207 Boulder Lane Herman Capt Partners V Llc 6000 Bryant Avenue N Rto Investments Llc 6218 Unity Avenue N ISHMAEL KOMARA 10/23/23 -5- DRAFT 6800 Bryant Avenue N Peter Nguyen RENEWAL (TYPE II – two-year license) 4819 Azelia Avenue N Third Street/Azelia Prop Llc 5415 69th Avenue N Phs Maranatha Inc 509 61st Avenue N Timothy Martin Daniel 2812 Ohenry Road Patrick Meier 3125 65th Avenue N Hp Minnesota I Llc 3819 61st Avenue N Fred Hanus Llc 5333 Bryant Avenue N Badikambudi Helene Kazadi 5336 Sailor Lane T J Agene & O E Agene 5415 Emerson Avenue N Mnsf Ii W1 Llc 5443 Logan Avenue N Imani Rock Group Llc 5814 Pearson Drive Ih2 Property Illinois Lp 5937 Vincent Avenue N Jack Johnson 7148 Morgan Avenue N FRED HANUS LLC RENEWAL (TYPE I – three-year license) 6012 Kyle Avenue N James R Hager 7037 Humboldt Avenue N Gao Qiang Liu 6c. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE AMENDMENT TO EASEMENTS FOR LOT 1, BLOCK 1, JOSLYN SECOND ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Motion passed unanimously. 7. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 10/23/23 -6- DRAFT 8a. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE FINES/ CITATIONS, TALL GRASS AND WEED ABATEMENT COSTS, AND DEAD DISEASE TREE ABATEMENT COSTS City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited Community Development Director Jesse Anderson to make the staff presentation. Community Development Director Jesse Anderson explained Minnesota law allows cities to recover costs of certain types of services through special assessment of the property. The City incurs costs associated with these public service programs and activities. If unpaid, the costs may be specially assessed to the property. A public hearing is required. Mr. Anderson noted there are four Public Hearings scheduled for October 23, 2023, to consider certification of proposed special assessments. The Notice of Public Hearing was posted in the City’s official newspaper, Sun Post, on September 28, 2023. All potentially affected property owners have been notified by mail of the date of the Public Hearing and the amount of the proposed special assessments. As of October 16, 2023, no formal appeals have been received by City staff. Mr. Anderson stated in instances where properties are found to be in violation of the Code, a written compliance notice is provided to the owner of record. In addition to notifying the owner of record, in certain cases, properties may be posted or other responsible parties may be notified. A follow-up inspection is conducted to verify that the property was brought into compliance with the code. If compliance has not been achieved, then the City will send additional notices or staff take corrective actions to remove the public nuisance or hazard, depending on the nature of the issue. Mr. Anderson pointed out that in the case of an abatement, the City bills the owner of record for the portion of costs the City incurred directly related to the abatement action. A service charge is applied to help recover administrative costs associated with the abatement process such as time spent on inspections, notifications, invoicing, overhead, and the like. The costs of the abatements are recorded as pending special assessments and this information is available to the public. Mr. Anderson pointed out there is an increased enforcement on unlicensed rental properties. Administrative citations were issued for operating without a rental license. For administrative citations and fines, an appeal process is prescribed by City Ordinance Chapter 18. Information about the appeal process and timeframes is provided with the citation. Mr. Anderson explained once an assessment roll is adopted by the Council, the owner of each property has two options. The first is to pay the entire amount of the special assessment, without interest, between October 24, 2023 and November 27, 2023. If payments are made with property taxes, the first payment will be due with taxes in 2024. The total principal will be payable in annual installments for the period stated on the levy roll and as indicated below. Interest of 3.5 percent is accrued on the unpaid balance. Based on feedback from the City Council, staff had a discussion with Hennepin County staff regarding partial payments. The County has stated that after an assessment is certified partial payments can't be accepted. However, they have granted Brooklyn 10/23/23 -7- DRAFT Center permission to accept partial payments prior to the assessments being certified to Hennepin County. Mr. Anderson noted these fees help recover some costs the City incurs related to services provided to specific properties. For accounting purposes, special assessment fees are included in the general fund as revenue. It is anticipated that these costs recovered through special assessments will be received in 2024, and are therefore included in the 2023 budget. The levy roll for administrative fines/citations totals $183,050. The levy roll for weed destruction totals $15,410. The levy roll for dead/diseased tree removal totals $27,157. Also, the levy roll for abatements totals $47,982.36. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to open the Public Hearings concurrently. Motion passed unanimously. Carol L. explained he was speaking on behalf of her ill son. She and her family have always lived in Brooklyn Center. Her son leased his property through his ex-fiancé’s mom and went to live with Carol L. The leasing agent isn’t allowing the son to check in on the rental property. Since then, Carol L.’s son has been assessed with administrative and weed abatement . The leasing agent has been hiding the notices from Carol L.’s son. She asked the Council why Brookl yn Center and its Staff are being unhelpful. Ultimately, it is unfair for her son to be held responsible for the abatements. Mayor Graves asked for Carol L. to provide her contact information to Dr. Edwards. Carol L. noted she had left a voicemail for Mayor Graves that was unreturned. She thanked the Council for their time. Matt F. stated he has a special assessment for tall grass and an inoperable vehicle. The fine doubles if the violation isn’t handled after the first violation. He explained he was going through a difficult time due to debt and his house was in foreclosure. The home was inherited from his mother after she passed. He acknowledged he understood the initial citation, and he had been saving up to address the concerns. However, the doubling of fines is burdensome, and his fines are around $9,000. Matt F. added an ex-girlfriend had left the inoperable car in his driveway. He has been unable to get in touch with her to obtain the title to do anything with the vehicle. He is still trying to find a solution to address the inoperable car. As for the grass, it has been maintained in recent months. Mayor Graves asked Matt F. to provide his contact information to the staff. An attorney on behalf of Matt F. pointed out that the assessed amount tripled in 23 days. October 3, 2023, there was a fee of $3,000. The next citation was for $6,000, and it is unclear if the total fee was then $6,000 or $9,000. 10/23/23 -8- DRAFT Mayor Graves asked if the tripling of the fine is a common practice. Mr. Anderson explained fees typically start at $125 or $300. There would be two letters followed by a citation. After 30 days, the fee increases. The fees increase up to $2,000 per violation. Mayor Graves asked for the Council to be sent a list of the fees and for a Work Session to be scheduled to review the citation process. Mr. Anderson stated the fines are part of the fee schedule, and the new fee schedule will be up for discussion prior to approval in the coming weeks. Councilmember Kragness asked if there is a way to stop the additional citations if the recipient contacts staff after receiving an earlier one to set up a payment plan. Mr. Anderson stated the citations aren’t issued due to nonpayment, and there aren’t any late fees. The citation is issued if the violation is still occurring. Staff typically grants extensions if requested. Alfreda stated she has heard concerns from other community members regarding the financial burden of the fees. COVID-19 has further crippled resident’s financial capacity. Also, businesses have been unable to afford the required maintenance. People are calling staff daily for help, and they are not receiving any assistance. She asked if the C ity offers resources to help with the cost burden or if staff could sit down with residents to explain the process and help. Councilmember Kragness moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to close the concurrent Public Hearings. Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Graves pointed out the City has a program regarding home maintenance. She asked the staff if there were other resources available. Mr. Anderson stated the City offers a grant program to help with home maintenance, but it has a very long waiting list. Another program is where the City partners up with an agency to offer a home repair loan with a lower interest rate. External organizations offer assistance such as handyman repairs. The information is all available on the City’s website. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to adopt Resolution No. 2023-95 Certifying Special Assessments for Administrative citations to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to adopt Resolution No. 2023-96 Certifying Special Assessments for Diseased Tree Removal Costs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Kragness moved and Mayor Graves seconded to adopt Resolution No. 2023-97 Certifying Special Assessments for Weed Removal Costs to the Hennepin County Property Tax 10/23/23 -9- DRAFT Rolls. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Butler moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to adopt Resolution No. 2023-98 Certifying Special Assessments for Abatements Costs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked for the City Council to be updated on conversations with Carol L. and Matt F. 8b. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DELINQUENT 2023 PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICE ACCOUNTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY TAX ROLLS City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited Director of Fiscal & Support Services Angela Holm to make the staff presentation. Director of Fiscal & Support Services Angela Holm explained Minnesota law allows cities to recover costs of certain types of services through special assessment to the property. The City incurs costs of providing public utilities, typically recovered through user charges. If the user charges remain unpaid, the costs may be assessed to the property. A public hearing is required for the assessment. Ms. Holm pointed out that the City of Brooklyn Center certifies delinquent utility bills to Hennepin County annually. The certified bills become assessments on the property owner’s property tax bill for the following year. Ms. Holm stated this process starts with a letter to the customer notifying them that their account is past due and that the amount will be certified against their property taxes. It is balances of $400 or more that are past due as of July 12, 2023. The letter details the process and the legal authority for certification. Recipients of this letter are advised they may dispute the charges at a public hearing. The date, time, and location of the public hearing was published in the official newspaper of the City. Customers who have not paid by the cut-off date in the letter, which is November 22, 2023, are included in the final assessment roll submitted to the County. Ms. Holm noted once an assessment roll is adopted by the Council, the owner has two options. First, the customer can pay the entire amount of the assessment without interest by November 22, 2023. Alternatively, the customer can pay the assessment with taxes in 2024 with interest accrued from December 1, 2023. The total principal and total interest is due in 2024. Current unpaid charges amount to $582,021.22. There are 597 unpaid accounts. 86 percent of certifications are under $1,000. The amount is similar to the numbers in 2021. 2022 was much 10/23/23 -10- DRAFT higher in terms of unpaid charges and accounts. Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Melissa T. explained she has been facing economic issues since COVID-19 and is a single parent of children who are also struggling with financial and mental health issues. She asked if there were resources available, similar to resources for heat utilities. Mayor Graves asked for Melissa T. to provide her contact information to Staff for them to follow up. Devon W. asked if he could speak directly with staff regarding his concerns. Mayor Graves asked for the commenter to provide his contact information to Staff for them to follow up. Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved and Mayor Graves seconded to adopt Resolution No. 2023-99 Certifying Special Assessments for Delinquent Public Utility Service Accounts to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls. Motion passed unanimously. 8c. RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2024-01, ORCHARD LANE EAST IMPROVEMENTS City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited Director of Public Works Elizabeth Heyman to make the staff presentation. Director of Public Works Elizabeth Heyman introduced Principal Engineer Lydia Ener to continue the presentation. Principal Engineer Lydia Ener showed a slide with the schedule of the process thus far and an image of the project area. The projects include partial street reconstruction which includes full- depth pavement replacement, miscellaneous repairs of concrete curb and gutter and driveway aprons, boulevard restoration, replacing catch basin castings as necessary within the project areas, and replacing or repairing catch basins and laterals where deteriorated or impacted by other utility work, replacing most of the main, along with the valves and hydrants, and lining of the sanitary sewer main, with spot replacements as necessary. Ms. Ener showed images of some of the streets. The pavement was last reconstructed in 1996. Roadway widths will remain at 30 feet. The curb was inspected, and there will be spot replacement as necessary. The existing storm sewer pipes are six inches to 12 inches and were constructed 10/23/23 -11 - DRAFT between 1956 and 1996. The existing lighting is owned by Xcel and exists at intersections and mid-blocks at approximately every 700 feet. Ms. Ener stated water main components were installed between 1956 and 1996 and existing pipes are six inches to 12 inches. Proposed improvements for the water main are replacing the older sections and hydrant and gate valve replacement. Ms. Ener noted the sanitary sewer was installed between 1956 and 1996 and existing pipes are eight inches to 12 inches, with some larger collector pipes. Condition surveys were taken of sewers and manholes. The recommended sanitary sewer improvements include lining of the main, with spot replacements as necessary. Ms. Ener pointed out there will be some tree impacts from the project. The impacts have been reviewed by the City’s forester. There will be removals of diseased trees and ash trees and some impacted by utility construction. Root cutting will be done where possible. Otherwise, there will be a one-to-one replacement of all removed trees. Ms. Ener added other impacts including driveway impacts. This will be determined by utility improvements and curb replacement. There will be saw-cutting for bituminous driveways, and removal to the nearest joint for concrete. Also, sodding will be added to impacted areas. Ms. Ener explained to gather information from the public on the project prior to feasibility, a neighborhood open house was held on August 3, 2023. Invitations for the meeting were mailed to properties and signboards were placed in the neighborhood prior to the meeting. The goal of the meeting was to provide project information to property owners and residents and gain input from the public on potential project upgrades. Each attendee was able to discuss how the project would impact their home. Some voiced concerns about driveway access during construction. Miscellaneous questions were asked about private utilities and the assessment process. All attendees seemed satisfied with having their questions answered, and many expressed interest in personal follow-up when construction begins. Ms. Ener stated in addition to the neighborhood meeting, surveys regarding the project and existing conditions were mailed to residents and made available online. The majority of survey responses indicated the properties had not had issues with flooding, sanitary services, or water services. Overall, the resident responses were not in favor of additional sidewalks or street lighting. Ms. Ener pointed out second neighborhood meeting was scheduled for Thursday, October 19th. Property owners were mailed invitations to the meeting. This meeting was a presentation style and provided additional information on action taken by the Council approving the Feasibility Report, the current progress of design, and will be an opportunity to provide more specific property impacts. In addition, the assessments included in the Feasibility Report were available to discuss with residents or answer questions. Questions were primarily on the assessment process, construction access, impacts, and timing. Ms. Ener stated the preliminary project is estimated to cost $11.8 million. About $1.5 million will 10/23/23 -12- DRAFT come from assessments. The rest of the funding is from utility fees and the street reconstruction plan. She noted corner lots are not assessed twice. Ms. Ener stated a majority of the properties fall under R1 and R2, and the assessment rate will be set at the November 13, 2023 meeting. The rate is based on the construction cost index. A typical R1 and R2 property will be assessed at approximately $4,015 per property. This was a 5.5 percent increase from the 2023 rate and accounts to $35 to $56 in monthly payments. The interest rate will be 5.5 percent, which is based on the City bonding. Ms. Ener added R4, R5, R6, R7, commercial, and industrial properties costs are determined by project costs. The interest rate will be 5.5 percent, which is based on the City bonding. Ms. Ener pointed out options are to pay in full before September 30, 2024, pay in full or partial payment from October 1, 2024, to November 17, 2024, with interest starting on October 1, 2024, or to pay in installments with property taxes over a ten-year period starting in 2025, which would be with a 5.5 percent interest rate. Councilmember Butler asked what the City’s responsibility is for the sod. Ms. Ener stated a sod letter will be sent to the homeowner with more information and best practices. The City is responsible for the first 30 days of the sod. There is an inspection of the sod at the end of the 30 days to ensure the installation was done correctly. Mayor Graves noted Brooklyn Boulevard looks very terrible due to the dead sod. She asked who is responsible for that sod. Ms. Ener offered for Staff to look into the warrant period. Ms. Heyman noted Brooklyn Boulevard is a County road. The City did take on maintenance responsibilities with the reconstruction project. She offered for staff to look into options. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked if someone could pay a partial amount and then choose to have the rest added to the tax roll. Ms. Ener confirmed that was correct. The partial payment option is new to the process. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked what the previous interest rate was. Ms. Ener stated the previous interest rate was 3.5 percent. Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Adam stated everyone would like a copy of the presentation to review. He asked if the assessment could be higher than the $4,015 projection. Ms. Ener stated it is a conservative assessment, so it won’t be higher than $4,015. Once the amount is set, it won’t be changed based on bids received or market conditions. She added the presentation would be added to the project website. 10/23/23 -13- DRAFT Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked for the presentation to be added to the City website. Ms. Ener stated the project website is within the City website. Councilmember Lawrence- Anderson asked for information on how to access the project website to be included in future notification letters. Ms. Ener stated the letters have and will continue to have a QR code to access the project website. Councilmember Jerzak read an email from concerned parties Carl and Morgan K. as they were unable to attend the Council meeting. They expressed their disagreement with assessments for basic City infrastructure as the tax dollars should already be allotted for such critical updates. They pointed to poor financial planning and urged the Council to find funding within the budget. Mayor Graves asked for the presentation to be sent to Carl and Morgan K. Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded to close the Public Hearing. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to adopt Resolution No. 2023-100 Ordering the Orchard Lane East Improvements, Improvement Project No. 2024-01, and Authorizing Preparation of Project Plans and Specifications. Motion passed unanimously. RECESS AND RECONVENE Mayor Graves called for a short recess at 8:13 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:22 p.m. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 9a. RESOLUTION FOR PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2023-006, SUBMITTED BY AWC HOLDINGS LLC, FOR CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TWO-TENANT BUILDING TO AN APPROXIMATELY 10,200-SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT AND BAR (NIGHTCLUB) WITH 704-SQUARE FOOT OUTDOOR PATIO (5927 JOHN MARTIN DRIVE) Dr. Edwards introduced the item and invited Planner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh to continue the staff presentation. City Planner Ginny McIntosh reviewed a request for review and consideration of a proposal that would convert the existing New King Buffet and former Tires Plus located at 5927 John Martin Drive into an approximately 10,200-square foot restaurant and bar with approximately 1,200- square foot outdoor patio. Jambo Africa, of which the applicant is associated, is a restaurant and bar currently located at 1601 Freeway Boulevard in Brooklyn Center that specializes in African cuisine. As is noted in their narrative, they note that they will be transferring, “all restaurant operations from the current location, 1601 Freeway Blvd, to the new location, 5927 John Martin Drive.” 10/23/23 -14- DRAFT Ms. McIntosh showed images of the site. The site is approximately 1.36 acres and is currently zoned for transit-oriented development. Ms. McIntosh stated the property originally received site and building plan approval in 1979 under Planning Commission Application No. 79035 for what was originally a Berger Brothers sporting goods shop. As originally contemplated, the building was to primarily serve as an approximately 8,820-square foot retail shop, with a proximately 1,425-square feet of storage area. At the time, the Subject Property was zoned C2 (Commerce) District, which allowed for retail uses, and contemplated 85 on-site parking spaces for the retail store. Ms. McIntosh noted that in 1991, the formerly single-use retail building received a proposal to convert into a two-tenant building when Tires Plus auto shop expressed interest in locating on the Subject Property and following the closure of Berger Brothers. Tires Plus ultimately took approximately 3,700 square feet of the west side of the property with the remaining approximately 6,500 square feet left available for a new user. The current Property Owner, Lin Shuang LLC, purchased the property in 2007. Tires Plus closed their location at the site last year and the property was listed for sale shortly thereafter. Ms. McIntosh stated the property is centrally located within the City’s designated approximately 80-acre Opportunity Site. A draft Opportunity Site Master Plan has been underway for a number of years and at present the plans are to move toward a final adoption by the end of this year. In July 2021, the City of Brooklyn Center City Council adopted an Infrastructure Framework for the Opportunity Site, which is intended to serve as a proactive, guiding document and focused on four core components within the 80-acre Opportunity Site. While the framework is intended to help inform decision-making, it was also designed to provide certain flexibilities and dependent upon market conditions. Ms. McIntosh noted in 2022, an approximately 16-acre Phase I redevelopment of the Opportunity Site was approved by the City Council under Planning Commission Application No. 2022-003— this phase is located south of the property. A proposed Garden Street is contemplated to run approximately between the property and 5939 John Martin Drive, which is owned by the City’s Economic Development Authority (EDA), and south through additional lands owned by the City’s EDA before connecting to a proposed public roadway extension approved as part of Phase I. Ms. McIntosh pointed out that the Infrastructure Framework specifically denotes John Martin Drive, which the Subject Property fronts, as a future “Main Street.” While dependent on market conditions and receptivity of existing land owners, the Infrastructure Framework calls out a potential future road running in proximity to the existing driveway curb cut, which serves both the Subject Property and 5939 John Martin Drive, which is owned by the EDA. Ms. McIntosh stated staff initially met with the applicant in July 2023, at which time the building reflected a restaurant and bar use. Conversion triggers a Major Site and Building Plan Amendment process under Section 35-7605 because there would be a 25 percent or greater change in the floor area of the structure. 10/23/23 -15- DRAFT Ms. McIntosh noted the staff had a follow-up meeting with the applicant to discuss the application and planned submittal materials. Following the submittal of plans, City Staff determined the building would be considered a nightclub use, which requires a CUP. On August 16, 2023, the applicant’s architect confirmed the use and began the CUP process. Ms. McIntosh stated on September 9, 2023, Staff formally requested the applicant apply for a parking variance, address concerns and revisions, and a 60-day application extension. The variance application, fee, and supplemental information were received by staff on September 13, 2023. On September 14, 2023, a public hearing was held for the building plan and CUP, but there was a request to continue the public hearing to October 12. There was proper publishing completed for the public hearing, which was held on October 12, 2023. Ms. McIntosh stated applicant outlines in their narrative that they would remodel the existing approximately 10,200-square foot building for a restaurant and bar with a nightclub. There are no plans to alter the exterior of the building other than the removal of an existing loading door on the south elevation, and the existing overhead bay doors used previously by Tires Plus on the west elevation, but those would be replaced with glass. This elevation would also feature an approximately 1,200-square foot outdoor patio that would project approximately 17 feet out and be located just under 8 feet from the property line shared with 5939 John Martin Drive, which is owned by the City’s EDA. Ms. McIntosh pointed out that access to the Subject Property is limited to the single shared curb cut located off John Martin Drive. As proposed, the existing curb cut and parking layout would remain. The only area proposed for modification, which would impact the existing site circulation is the west elevation where the bay doors to the former Tires Plus are located. The installation of the permanent patio would ultimately shift any vehicular traffic onto neighboring 5939 John Martin Drive, which is owned by the City’s EDA. City Code outlines a minimum of 24 feet in width for drive aisles accommodating two-way traffic, and a minimum of 20 feet is required under Minnesota Fire Code for fire access. Ms. McIntosh noted the determination of use and overall business function is crucial as it informs actual peak parking demands. Section 35-5502 (Off-Street Parking Requirements) provides that, “off-street parking and loading spaces shall be provided in all multi-family residential, mixed-use, commercial, and industrial districts in accordance with the requirements of this Unified Development Ordinance.” City Staff relayed concerns early on as to whether all minimum parking needs would be met on-site given the use and size of the establishment and the Applicant inquired about potential options for parking off-site, including surrounding EDA-owned property. Ms. McIntosh stated there are provisions within the City Code that allow for a development to reduce the required off-street parking spaces by up to fifty percent when it can be demonstrated, in a parking-traffic study, and prepared consistent with City standards, and through the use of transit or demand management programs, noted special characteristics, etc. A parking traffic study was not provided as part of the submittal. Section 35-5503 allows for a portion of required parking spaces to be located on an adjacent property if the parking area complies with the standards and as authorized in accordance with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Although shared 10/23/23 -16- DRAFT parking is encouraged in instances where it may be mutually beneficial for multiple users, the City Code requires a burden of proof for a reduction in the total number of parking spaces. Ms. McIntosh added the property is surrounded on three sides by City EDA-owned property (5939 and 5915 John Martin Drive, and approximately 5.5 acres of 5910 Shingle Creek Parkway). HealthPartners Dental Clinic is located to the south; however, the majority of its on-site parking is located on yet another City EDA-owned property located at 5900 Shingle Creek Parkway via a driveway and parking easement. Ms. McIntosh noted the applicant inquired as to whether off-site parking might be an option at the strip mall located to the northwest of the site and located at 6000 and 6050 Shingle Creek Parkway; however, these properties are part of a Reciprocal Easement Agreement with the neighboring former Target, located at 6100 Shingle Creek Parkway and also owned by the City’s EDA. Said agreement provides shared parking and access between parcels with the majority of parking located on the Target site. Ms. McIntosh explained, as proposed, that no alterations would be made to the existing parking lot other than select re-striping. The submitted plans denote 80 available on-site parking spaces on the Subject Property. The original site and building plan approvals, as contemplated under Planning Commission Application No. 79035, identified 85 parking spaces; however, it appears five parking spaces were removed to accommodate a trash enclosure located at the southeast corner of the building and intended for the current restaurant use. Ms. McIntosh noted that City staff and the applicant were not in agreeance as to the determination of minimum parking needs for the Subject Property. The applicant’s architect had operated under the assumption that the entirety of the use would have parking calculated assuming an “Assembly” calculation, which would assume a minimum of one parking space for every three seats per person, including any staff. In reviewing the provided occupancy load calculations for the space, a maximum occupant load of 240 persons would indeed require a minimum of 80 parking spaces; however, the occupant load numbers were adjusted with respect to the dining, patio, and dance floor areas to calculate occupancy based off the provided layout of the tables and seating, as opposed to the occupant load as calculated under Minnesota Building Code. Ms. McIntosh concluded assuming 80 on-site parking spaces, City staff ultimately determined that the property is likely deficient by 74 parking spaces and would therefore require a parking variance. A site plan is provided; however, no dimensions are provided that note parking space dimensions, drive aisle widths, and alterations. As noted in the Assistant City Engineer’s memo, it also appears that ADA parking is insufficient. Should additional ADA loading spaces be required, this may increase the overall parking deficiency. Ms. McIntosh pointed out photometric plan was submitted with the application submittal; however, the originally provided plan does not provide the detailing necessary to determine whether it meets the code provisions as outlined under Section 35-5400. In response to a request for revised plans, the applicant provided an updated photometric plan and fixture specification on September 13, 2023. 10/23/23 -17- DRAFT Ms. McIntosh noted with that said, any photometric plan provided shall clearly demonstrate consistent levels of illumination across the existing open-air parking lot and avoid pockets of very high or low levels of illumination. Spot illuminations shall be provided to clearly demonstrate adherence to minimum and maximum illumination levels, as well as uniformity, and a fixture schedule provided. Ms. McIntosh added City staff had previously conveyed to the applicant that the existing pole and wall lighting on the property is non-conforming with respect to City Code requirements. Detail sheets were also requested of the applicant to demonstrate enhanced illumination overall primary building entrances or exits and any pedestrian pathways as outlined under Section 35-5401.m.2. Ms. McIntosh stated there are no plans to alter the exterior of the building, with the exception of adjustments to openings on the west and south elevations. As proposed, and as noted above, an existing loading dock door would be removed and patched to match the existing exterior. While the provided site plan notes this removal and patching, a detail sheet would be required for submittal as part of any building permit process. Ms. McIntosh pointed out that the west elevation currently features a series of garage bay doors that formerly served Tires Plus. As proposed, four of the garage bay doors would be removed and replaced with smaller, transom-style windows. The remaining sections below will be patched. Although this elevation notes the use of a “squared” concrete block to match the existing material, it appears the building material that this elevation is predominately comprised of is split rib or fluted concrete. City staff would request confirmation as it appears there is a squared or scored concrete block located in the section of the south elevation of the building. Ms. McIntosh explained the remaining two garage bay doors would be replaced with operable glass doors that would lead out onto a proposed 1,200-square foot outdoor patio. Said patio would be surrounded by an eight-foot-high fence. City staff question the functionality of the proposed outdoor patio, as it appears the only access would be via the garage door. Additional safety concerns were raised in the letter addressed to the applicant on September 9, 2023, regarding the identified gates for exiting, as they would open out onto the parking lot and drive aisles. Ms. McIntosh stated the project submittal includes a landscape plan and detail sheet; however, no inventory of existing plantings and species or types was provided and City staff was unable to conduct a full review. City Staff did make a formal request to the Applicant for this additional information as part of a letter dated September 9, 2023. City staff provided the Applicant with copies of the original and last revised landscape plans on file and as included with the preceding Planning Commission and City approvals on record from 1979 and 1991. Ms. McIntosh explained following a review of these plantings, which were all outlined on the original 1979 landscape plan schedule, City staff requested the Applicant replace the Japanese green leaf barberry with an alternate shrub, as the Minnesota DNR notes “Japanese Barberry” as a restricted planting with the propagation and sale of its numerous cultivars, including green barberry, noted as prohibited within the state of Minnesota. 10/23/23 -18- DRAFT Ms. McIntosh added no specific signage requests were made as part of the Application submittal. Any new signage would be required to comply with the provisions outlined within Section 35- 6000. Ms. McIntosh stated James Soltis, Assistant City Engineer, reviewed the submitted site plan and provided a memorandum dated September 5, 2023. The memo was most recently revised on October 5, 2023. There were questions regarding MN ADA compliance and potential impacts to the overall site circulation and safety considerations for safely exiting off the patio. Ms. McIntosh added Building Official Dan Grinsteinner conducted a cursory review of the proposal and worked with City staff through a determination of outlined and expected occupancy loads for the building and patio and with respect to the minimum required parking. A fire sprinkler and monitoring system is required for installation and is to be maintained at all times, and sufficient fire hydrants shall be provided. Additional detailing will be required to provide access to a fire sprinkler room or wall connections. Ms. McIntosh pointed out City staff requests that as part of any construction set review and in advance of any permit release, a CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Design) review be completed by City staff. Ms. McIntosh stated they need to coordinate with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MCPA) to address the abandonment of flammable interceptors as well as any potential regulations for conversion of use. City staff noted open permitting for above-ground tanks, per the MPCA website. Ms. McIntosh reiterated when City staff initially met with the applicant, where it was conveyed that the applicant intended to open a restaurant and bar at the property; however, the applicant’s architect has come to agree with City staff’s interpretation that there was a “nightclub” component and clarifying that, under building code, restaurants and nightclubs were in the same occupancy type category. They further agreed to apply for a Conditional Use Permit. Ms. McIntosh explained Conditional Use Permits, as outlined under Section 35-7700, are those uses that have been identified, because of their nature, operation, location, special requirements or characteristics, and that may only be allowed in a particular zoning district after submittal of an application, review, and recommendation by the Planning Commission, and approval by the City Council. The Conditional Use Permit process regulates: the location, magnitude, and design of conditional uses consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and the regulations, purposes, and procedures of this Unified Development Ordinance. Ms. McIntosh pointed out that in order to qualify for a CUP, the conditional must be in accordance with the general objectives, or with any specific objective, of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and this UDO. The site is within Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) and meets the objectives. Ms. McIntosh stated the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use must promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the 10/23/23 -19- DRAFT public health, safety, morals, or comfort of other establishments. Similarly, the conditional use can not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. Ms. McIntosh added the CUP requires the use will not impede on the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. Adequate measures will have to be taken to provide ingress, egress, and parking to minimize traffic congestion in the streets. Impacts such as noise, hours of activity, and exterior light must be sufficiently addressed to mitigate negative impacts on nearby uses. Lastly, the conditional use must confirm to applicable regulations of the district. Ms. McIntosh explained variances may only be granted when the Applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.357, subdivision 6, the City Council may only grant approval of a variance where “practical difficulties” exist as to the strict compliance with the City’s Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and each of the criteria are satisfied. Ms. McIntosh pointed out that the criteria include that the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the City’s Unified Development Ordinance, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Unified Development Ordinance, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, variance if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Ms. McIntosh noted the public hearing notice was published in the Sun Post on August 31, 2023, for the site and building plan and conditional use permit requests and September 28, 2023, for the variance requests. Mail notifications were sent out to taxpayers and physical properties located within 350 feet of the property. The public hearing notice was also published on the City website as a link. Ms. McIntosh stated based on the findings, and given the request by City staff in a letter to the applicant dated September 9, 2023, to apply for a parking variance, provision of additional information and revised plans, and the requested application extension. Ms. McIntosh pointed out that at the October 12, 2023, public hearing, the applicant and supporters of the project were present. City staff did not receive other public comments. The Planning Commission engaged in a lengthy discussion of the proposed use. First, there was concern about the alignment of the proposed use with the City’s Opportunity Site plans and adopted Infrastructure Framework, as the property is centrally located within the designated area. General inquiries were presented as to whether the applicant is on the same page with where the City is headed and if the applicant considered other locations. The Planning Commission expressed concerns relating to the proposed use already being and technically beyond capacity along with the inability for future expansion. 10/23/23 -20- DRAFT Ms. McIntosh stated next, there were concerns about ADA parking deficiencies, as identified by Staff, and the justification for using Uber and Lyft to offset parking needs. There weren’t details about where the services would be staged. Although staff noted the 58-spot parking space deficiency, it was later determined the provided site plan falls short of minimum ADA-required parking. MN Accessibility Code requires a minimum of four ADA spaces rather than the two spaces presented. Ultimately, this results in a deficiency of 59 spots to accommodate a shared ADA loading space. Ms. McIntosh added the Planning Commission had concerns about snow removal and storage plans for the property given the property is built out. The winter months would only exacerbate the parking deficiencies. Also, there was a lack of any proposed investment into the exterior of the existing building other than some wall patching and two glass garage doors. The building is more than 40 years old, and there needs to be consideration for the accelerated deterioration of the building in the last few years. Ms. McIntosh stated there were safety concerns relating to the egress and the proposed outdoor patio. Commissioner comments referenced past instances of restaurants and nightclubs where stampeding occurred during an emergency and if there was proper egress provided. The Commission made inquiries to Staff as to whether they were comfortable with the plans. Ms. McIntosh noted there were inquiries on the categorization of the “nightclub” use and questions relating to whether the proposed use would confirm to the City’s noise regulations. Questions were also raised related to the two glass doors that would need to remain open to allow for patio access. Ms. McIntosh pointed out the Planning Commission had concerns about the overall business operations and considerations for trash, safety, security, and sufficient lighting. Lastly, the Commissioners asked the City Attorney how tedious a process of revocation would be for a CUP. Ms. McIntosh stated following the close of the public hearing, the Planning Commission elected to recommend (3-2) City Council approval of the requested site and building plan, DUP, and parking variance. Ms. McIntosh stated there are three options for the Council to consider. First, is approval of the variance, CUP, and site and building plan. Second, is the approval of the variance but denial of the CUP and site and building plan. Lastly, the Council can deny all components. Mayor Graves asked why the process was different than normal. City Attorney Jason Hill stated staff wanted to avoid resolution of denial or approval due to the tightness of the vote. Staff didn’t want any resolutions to reflect that a decision had already been made. He noted he has done a similar process in other cities. Also, the Council may have suggestions for items to add to the resolution. In short, the alternative process is for the sake of efficiency and clarity. Mr. Hill stated the variance must be approved in order for the other items to be approved due to the requirements of the variance. Mayor Graves asked what would happen if the second choice was the decision of the Council. Mr. Hill stated denying the CUP and site and building plan would 10/23/23 -21- DRAFT trigger a variance to be denied. Mr. Hill stated there are three applications at hand for the Council to consider. For the creation of a record and for legal purposes, there is a difference between the second and third options although the outcome is similar. Councilmember Butler stated the alternative process is unnerving as it is new and the negative comments from the meeting were shared. Also, the Planning Commission approved it. It seems like the staff is trying to get the Council to approve the measure and isn’t giving the applicant a fair shake. She asked if staff had worked with the applicant to work out the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission. Ms. McIntosh stated staff first became aware of the project in July 2023. It was originally a restaurant use which triggered a site and building plan requirement. Once the plan turned more into a nightclub use, then the process for a CUP was triggered. That created more discussion between staff and the applicant about several components. Ms. McIntosh pointed out the applicant did reduce the size of the patio which also improved the parking deficiency. There isn’t room to add more parking unless a trash enclosure is removed, which would allow for five more spots. Ms. McIntosh agreed she shared the concerns of the Planning Commission, but she also shared the consistently positive comments during the public hearing. There is a lot of reliance on staff figuring out issues along the way. For example, the lighting plan is lacking but staff would work with the applicant to bring the lighting in alignment with the Code. Ms. McIntosh added it is extremely unusual to have such a close vote. Councilmember Jerzak summarized his previous professional experience working with the applicant and the building owner. He requested that he abstain from the vote in the interest of fairness. Mr. Hill stated there is no legal or financial obligation for Councilmember Jerzak to abstain from the vote, but it is his prerogative to abstain. Councilmember Jerzak confirmed he would abstain from the vote and the discussion. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked what the purpose of the glass door was. Ms. McIntosh stated the glass garage door is for patio access. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated the door is concerning due to the climate of Minnesota. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson pointed out two Commissioners were absent. Ms. McIntosh pointed out there were six Commissioners present throughout the discussion, but only five were present for the vote. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked if the item could be returned to the Planning Commission to allow for a full vote. Mr. Hill stated it is not recommended the item be returned to the Planning Commission meeting, but the Council has the option to table the item for further consideration by the Council. 10/23/23 -22- DRAFT Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she would like to review the Planning Commission recording to have a better understanding of the discussion. She asked how many restrooms are in the facility. Ms. McIntosh stated the bathrooms have to meet Code requirements for the proper capacity. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson agreed she had concerns about the alignment of the proposal with the Opportunity Site, similar to the concern expressed by the Planning Commission. Councilmember Kragness asked if staff recommendation was in line with the vote of the Planning Commission. Mayor Graves stated staff is not making a recommendation either way. Ms. McIntosh pointed out there are comments about Code and City regulations throughout the proposal document made by staff, but the staff is not making a recommendation either way. She noted it is typical for items such as a photometric plan to be commonly missing from the process. However, staff pointed it out due to the nighttime use of the facility. Mayor Graves asked what the issues are with the lighting. Ms. McIntosh stated two photometric plans have been submitted, but the style has not been seen by staff before. Therefore, staff doesn’t have a great understanding of the lighting plan. Additionally, there are newer lighting requirements in Brooklyn Center due to recent Code changes. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to adopt Resolution No. 2023-101 Approving a Variance, Site, Building Plan, and Conditional Use Permit as outlined in Planning Commission Application No. 2023-006 at 5927 John Martin Drive, with photometric plan and lighting issues being addressed to be in compliance. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson pointed out she doesn’t want to interfere with the vision of the Opportunity Site. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson voted against the same. Councilmember Jerzak abstained from the vote. Motion passed. 10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS 10a. RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMMERCIAL LEASE AGREEMENT WITH PHU BIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1350 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING Dr. Edwards introduced the item and invited Community Development Director Jesse Anderson to make the staff presentation. Mr. Anderson explained 1350B Shingle Creek Crossing was a vacant shell space the City constructed when the municipal liquor store was built. The intent of the shell space was to provide brick-and-mortar space for small business owners while maintaining commercial affordable in Brooklyn Center. The EDA has approved a $70,000 commercial build-out loan to Phu Bia Produce 10/23/23 -23- DRAFT LLC with the condition of executing a lease agreement between Phu Bia Produce LLC and the City of Brooklyn Center. The project scope consisted of new flooring, painted walls, walk-in cooler, a brand-new bathroom. Prior to Phu Bia, the shell space was empty and under-utilized. Mr. Anderson stated the City of Brooklyn Center is charging a base rate of fifteen dollars a square foot. Gross rent area is 3,500. The monthly rent collected from Phu Bia Produce LLC is $4,375. Rent payment is due on the first of each month. Rent payments were to start on August 1, 2022. In lieu of no build-out allowance on the shell space, six and a half months were granted to Phu Bia Produce LLC in order to support cash flow and minimize startup expenses. Mr. Anderson pointed out Phu Bia was not able to open according to schedule due to equipment availability at that time, contractor issues, and limited knowledge of navigating the health department and city process. Phu Bia recently received its certificate of occupancy and is now ordering products from their store. They've built out the empty shell space that the City owned and received a certificate of occupancy. Without an operating business, they have had a hard time paying rent and loan payments. Now that they are close to opening they anticipate being able to pay for their loan and lease going forward. Mr. Anderson noted as of October 17, the business owes $65,625 in back rent, $2,250 in late fees. They did make a payment of $6,105 towards their loan. The past due balance on the loan is $6,956.40. During a recent discussion with Mai Y Lor, owner of the business, Staff was notified that Phu Bia do not have the funds to pay the back rent and past due loan payments. Also, Ms. Lor does not foresee the ability to add any additional monthly expenses in the near future. Therefore, Staff have prepared a resolution modifying the loan and lease in order to address the past due balance. If the items is approved they are to start making lease payments on November 1, 2023. Mr. Anderson added City staff spoke with the City Attorney regarding actions that could be taken if the Council would prefer to not amend the lease and loan. According to the City Attorney, the following are potential actions that the City could take if there was no amendment. First, the lessee is in default for not paying rent. The City would provide at least 15 days-notice of default, and if not cured, the City can declare the lease terminated. The notice should include notice that personal property, equipment and fixtures must also be removed without damaging the premises. Mr. Anderson noted the City can immediately take possession of the premises, including personal property, equipment and fixtures. The City can commence an eviction action if the tenant remains on the premises. The City can bring suit against the lessee for amounts owed. The City can immediately make the premises ready for a new tenant, which includes removal of personal property, equipment and fixtures. If the City has to commence legal action, the lessee may be required to pay the City’s attorney’s fees. Councilmember Jerzak acknowledged the plight of the business, particularly ones out of control of the business owner. It appears to be a fragile business. There is no promise that Phu Bia will be able to pay the new agreement, and such an action could just be delaying the inevitable. Additionally, by waiving the outstanding $65,000, it would negatively impact other small businesses who would be able to access the funds through City programs. He doesn’t want different 10/23/23 -24- DRAFT businesses to be treated differently. Councilmember Jerzak pointed out there has been staff turnover, and there may be an issue with the City not intervening sooner or offering more resources to the business. He cited issues with requirements due to proximity with the Walmart building. Ultimately, it is a non-performing asset for the City. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked what the buildout cost was for the shell. Dr. Edwards stated the shell was an opportunity to subsidize startup micro BIPOC businesses. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated her understanding was the shell was built to offset the costs for building the liquor store, which was under Mayor Wilson. Mayor Graves noted her agreement with Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she is not comfortable forgiving $65,000 of taxpayer’s money. Dr. Edwards stated subsidizing startup micro BIPOC businesses doesn’t mean the revenue won’t benefit the prior construction costs of the Liquor Store. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson reiterated that the shell was built to offset the costs for building the liquor store. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson noted she would consider a forbearance but not outright forgiveness. Councilmember Butler noted her agreement with Dr. Edwards’ recollection of the purpose of the shell building. It seems like the City is setting the business up for failure, and it would be irresponsible of the City to move forward with the current tenant. Councilmember Kragness pointed out there is no ensured positive outcome if the City retains the current tenant. Councilmember Jerzak asked if the business is able to stop investing more money. Also, he suggested a settlement be reached regarding buyout of the lease that is amicable to both parties. Mr. Anderson stated there are products on the shelves, but he isn’t sure what they can or cannot get out of purchasing. The owner also has a permit and has purchased coolers. Mayor Graves agreed this is a tough issue, and she has received a number of emotional calls from the owner. There may have been some issues with language barriers and understanding the process to open a business. Not to mention, there were issues where the owner was taken advantage of throughout the construction process by third parties. Mayor Graves stated the shell space is a great idea and a wonderful opportunity for the City to promote small businesses. She added the City can do more to better support small businesses, such a Phu Bia, and noted Brooklyn Center has lost staff that could have helped in the situation. 10/23/23 -25- DRAFT Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to not adopt a resolution approving an amendment to the commercial lease agreement with Phu Bia limited liability company for property located at 1350 Shingle Creek Pkwy and direct staff to enter into discussions with the business owner regarding a settlement. Motion passed unanimously. 10b. RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ADOPTION OF TRAFFIC STOP AND CONSENT SEARCH POLICIES FOR THE BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE DEPARTMENT Dr. Edwards introduced the item and invited the Director of the Office of Community Prevention, Health and Safety LaToya Turk and Police Chief Kellace McDaniel to make the staff presentation. Ms. Turk explained in May 2021, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center adopted Resolution No. 2021-73, a resolution adopting the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Act . Since February 28, 2022, the Implementation Committee has conducted regular meetings, and working with experts to gather data and consider City Code amendments, ordinances, resolutions, policies, and guidelines with regard to public health-oriented approaches to community safety. In September of 2022, the Committee developed and prepared policy recommendations regarding traffic stops and consent searches. Ms. Turk pointed out that in June 2023, staff made recommendations to the City Council regarding traffic stops and consent searches based upon a review of the recommendations made earlier by the Implementation Committee. Following the staff’s presentation, the Council directed staff to bring back a resolution adopting a policy for traffic stops and consent searches based upon Council discussion consensus during the June meeting. Ms. Turk stated it was the consensus of staff to separate traffic stops and consent searches in the subject matter. Also, it was determined regulation for traffic stops and consent searches by controlled by policy rather than ordinance. Ms. Turk noted the traffic stop policy states law enforcement officers will use alternative traffic enforcement for original causes as the sole reason for minimum and moderate safety risk traffic stops. However, officers may stop a vehicle for original causes as the sole reason alone that they are high-risk traffic stops. Chief McDaniel showed a table of traffic stop safety ratings. He stated when the police department was given this exercise he and the Commanders put them in categories and talked about th e minimum, moderate, and maximum safety ratings. Chief McDaniel stated it is difficult for a Chief to tell his officers not to enforce certain State laws, as this policy would force him to do. He added he does discipline every day based on the actions of the officers. He stated he would continue the presentation, but he is not comfortable implementing these policies. He added there are ways to do a teaching aspect for alternative traffic 10/23/23 -26- DRAFT enforcement, but the ultimate training of law enforcement is to keep the community safe. Mr. Hill stated that based on findings and studies conducted by the Committee and City staff, the recommended regulation of the initiation of traffic stops and consent searches is in accordance with the goals of the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Act. The regulations should be enacted through the adoption of policies rather than ordinances, and standalone policies should be incorporated into the Brooklyn Center Police Department Policy Manual. In order to allow for training and education timing, the effective policy date would begin in March 2024. The proposed resolution also requires any amendments to the policy to be made by the Council. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she would like Chief McDaniel to be present when the Council meets with the Implementation Committee. She explained she supports most of the components, but a joint conversation with all parties is required for negotiations. She would like the City Council, Implementation Committee, Community, and Police Department . The Implementation Committee has worked very hard, and she wants to make sure the policies are properly written and implemented. Councilmember Jerzak noted his agreement with Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson. He noted his preference to table the item until the Council meets with the Implementation Committee and to allow for the Council to better understand the concerns of the Police Chief. Councilmember Jerzak pointed out he would prefer for the restrictions be made at the State level to allow for consistency in conduct by all law enforcement agencies. Councilmember Butler stated she isn’t opposed to allowing Councilmembers more time to consider the recommendation, though it is disappointing to hear that some Councilmembers aren’t ready to implement the recommendation. She noted her appreciation of the comments made by Chief Kellace. Brooklyn Center has the opportunity to reimagine what public safety looks like. At the start of the process, the City was praised for its innovation, but it has failed to come to fruition thus far. Growing pains are to be expected, but the Council must make the tough calls. The process has already taken too long. Councilmember Kragness stated she isn’t comfortable with the recommendations due to the hesitancy noted by Chief McDaniel. She added that she has empathy for the community but does not want to be forced into making a decision that she doesn’t feel is the right decision. Councilmember Jerzak asked if the Council could have a consensus on a hard date of when the decision is going to be made. The process has taken a long time, and the Council needs to respect the Implementation Committee. Mayor Graves stated the present meeting was meant to be the hard date for a decision. Mayor Graves pointed out there are some things the Council isn’t going to agree upon. Similarly, the community likely has a very different perspective on policies than law enforcement does. She explained how the consent decree was implemented in Minneapolis. She would like to see a 10/23/23 -27- DRAFT pretextual stop policy more similar to the one created in Minneapolis in conjunction with the Department of Human Rights. Mayor Graves read a quote from the Stanford Law Review regarding pretextual stops and racial profiling. Pretextual stops are not a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Data shows a statistically significant disparity in pretextual stops between White people and BIPOC. However, the burden of proof is on the victim to show that law enforcement targeted someone based on race rather than traffic violations. Mayor Graves asked if it is generally safer for someone with a broken taillight to drive around or for someone to potentially be racially profiled. She stated she and her loved ones have experienced racial profiling. The City has the opportunity to do better. Mayor Graves stated some law enforcement may be hesitant, but that is to be expected when people are told to do something they are not used to. It seems as though the argument may be about power and control rather than safety. Mayor Graves read the Fourth Amendment aloud. The presentation by staff was a compromise between multiple parties. The policy prohibits people from being harassed, and it doesn’t prohibit law enforcement from enforcing actual safety concerns. Mayor Graves read another quote about warrants, probable cause, and consent to expose one’s privacy. Many people do not know they have a Constitutional right to deny consent searches. Consent searches are very likely to be coerced. Probable cause gives permission for law enforcement to search based on the likelihood of productivity. Consent searches have no well- founded justifications for a search. Law enforcement should be promoting the Fourth Amendment rather than trying to get around it. Mayor Graves stated she isn’t going to call for a vote because it doesn’t sound like the policy will pass based on the previous comments of the Council. It is unlikely that law enforcement will compromise more than they already have. The staff’s presentation is the product of countless conversations among staff, Council, and community members. Dr. Edwards noted the consensus of the Council was to not take a vote. He suggested tabling the item until after the Council has an opportunity to meet with the Implementation Committee. Mayor Graves pointed out the community is clear on its preference. The lack of clarity is from law enforcement’s support of the policy. She stated the Council needs to speak directly with law enforcement leadership. Dr. Edwards stated staff can vet the policy more and bring it back to the Council, but the staff feels as though it has already completed that step. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she wants to be present in the room where the discussions are happening because she is a decision-maker. 10/23/23 -28- DRAFT Councilmember Jerzak noted his agreement with the comments of Councilmember Lawrence- Anderson. He stated he was taken aback by the comments made by Chief Kellace during that evening’s meeting. Councilmember Jerzak pointed out he has no desire to kill the policy, but he needs to hear the concerns of law enforcement directly. Mayor Graves pointed out she has consistently kept her door open to meet with law enforcement. She hasn’t felt welcome to do the same with law enforcement. The matter is meant to improve safety for all and not be adversarial. Dr. Edwards stated there is a process for the Council to engage with the various Departments, which is for the Council to make requests of staff and for staff to return to the Council with the request completed. He offered to facilitate a conversation between the Council and all relevant staff. He stated he would gather the availability of the staff and Implementation Committee and return to the Council with potential meeting dates. He pointed out the entire Council won’t be back together again until mid-December. Mayor Graves requested the meeting have proper representation from law enforcement leadership. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to table consideration of a resolution adopting traffic stop and consent search policies for the Brooklyn Center police department. Motion passed unanimously. 11. COUNCIL REPORT None. 12. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved and Mayor Graves seconded the adjournment of the City Council meeting at 10:00 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:11/13/2023 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :Barb S uciu, A ssistant City Manager/C ity C lerk BY:S hannon Pe,t, D eputy C ity C lerk S U B J E C T:A pproval of Licens es Requested Council A con: - Moon to approve the licenses as presented. B ackground: The following bus inesses /persons have applied for C ity licens es as noted. Each bus iness/pers on has fulfilled the requirements of the City O rdinance governing res pec5ve licenses , submi6ed appropriate applica5ons, and paid proper fees. A pplicants for rental dwelling licens es are in compliance with C hapter 12 of the City Code of O rdinances, unless comments are noted below the property address on the a6ached rental report. M echanical A J M echanical L L C 8939 K irkwood C ir N, M aple G rove 55369 Vu P ham I nc. 12409 Midway C ir N E, Blaine 55449 S ign H anger ’s A pparently G raphic, LT D 8870 Zealand Ave N, Brooklyn Park 55445 V is ion S ign C ompany L L C 704 11th Ave S W, I s an5 55040 B udget I ssues: - None I nclusive C ommunity Engagement: - None A nracist/Equity Policy Effect: - None S trategic Priories and Values: S afe, S ecure, S table C ommunity, O pera5onal Excellence AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip5on U pload D ate Type Rental C riteria 6/20/2023 Backup M aterial Rental P roper5es 11/7/2023 Backup M aterial Page 2 of 2 b.Police Service Calls. Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12-911, and events categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, auto theft and arson. Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the victim and suspect are “Family or household members” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (b) and where there is a report of “Domestic Abuse” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (a). License Category Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Service & Part I Crimes (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category Impact 1-2 0-1 3-4 units 0-0.25 5 or more units 0-0.35 Decrease 1 Category 1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 3-4 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 Categories 1-2 Greater than 3 3-4 units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria License Category (Based on Property Code Only) Number of Units Property Code Violations per Inspected Unit Type I – 3 Year 1-2 units 0-2 3+ units 0-0.75 Type II – 2 Year 1-2 units Greater than 2 but not more than 5 3+ units Greater than 0.75 but not more than 1.5 Type III – 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 5 but not more than 9 3+ units Greater than 1.5 but not more than 3 Type IV – 6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 9 3+ units Greater than 3 Location Address License Subtype Renewal/Initial Owner Property Code Violations License Type Police CFS* Final License Type** Previous License Type*** Consecutive Type IV's 1510 69th Ave N Multiple Family 1 Bldg 4 Units Initial Julius Cochran 5 = 1.25 per unit Type II N/A Type II N/A N/A 922 53rd Ave N Single Initial CASA VERDE LLC 2 Type I N/A Type II N/A N/A 3815 Oak St. Single Initial D & T Properties, LLC 24 Type IV N/A Type IV N/A 0 5124 66th Ave N Single Initial Dominic T Minor 28 Type IV N/A Type IV N/A 0 4210 Lakebreeze Ave N Multiple Family 1 Bldg 4 Units Renewal Simons Revocable Trust 11 = 2.75 per unit Type III 0 Type III Type I N/A 7200 Camden Ave N Multiple Family 5 Bldgs 80 Units Renewal Namaka Evergreen, LLC Did not meet requirements No CFMH, CPTED or plan 384 = 4.8 per unit Type IV 0 Type IV Type III 0 2307 54th Ave N Two Family Renewal James J Johnson 2 Type I 0 Type I Type I N/A 4207 Lakeside Ave N, #339 Condo Renewal Nathan J Greiner 0 Type I 0 Type I Type I N/A 707 69th Ave N Single Renewal HP MINNESOTA I LLC 11 Type IV 0 Type IV Type II 0 1300 72nd Ave N Single Renewal Scott & Marinela Selseth Did not meet requirements No CFMH, CPTED or plan 7 Type III 0 Type III Type III N/A 1519 Humboldt Pl N Single Renewal Johnson Organization Inc 3 Type II 0 Type II Type II N/A 1525 Humboldt Pl N Single Renewal Johnson Organization Inc 3 Type II 0 Type II Type II N/A 1543 Humboldt Pl N Single Renewal Peter Imasuen 4 Type II 0 Type II Type II N/A 1549 Humboldt Pl N Single Renewal Johnson Organization Inc 7 Type III 0 Type III Type II N/A 1555 Humboldt Pl N Single Renewal Johnson Organization Inc 2 Type I 0 Type I Type II N/A 1600 69th Ave N Single Renewal Hieu C Vo Met Requirements 1 Type I 0 Type I Type IV N/A 2806 65th Ave N Single Renewal A-jelil Abdella & N Said Met Requirements 9 Type III 0 Type III Type III N/A 3101 61st Ave N Single Renewal Janice K Leonard Rev Trust 7 Type III 0 Type III Type II N/A 3819 Burquest La Single Renewal Amir Chaboki 2 Type I 0 Type I Type I N/A 4506 71st Ave N Single Renewal Obafemi Oladeji Did not meet requirements No rental plan 0 Type I 0 Type III Type III N/A 5006 France Ave N Single Renewal A&m Estate Services Llc 15 Type IV 0 Type IV Type II N/A 5301 France Ave N Single Renewal Juniper Land Trust Llc Did not meet requirements No CFMH or CPTED 0 Type I 0 Type IV Type IV 3 5312 Queen Ave N Single Renewal Renee Anoje 2 Type I 0 Type I Type I N/A 5348 70th Cir Single Renewal Xin Zhou 2 Type I 0 Type I Type I N/A 5351 Irving Ave N Single Renewal Cel Monton Llc 9 Type III 0 Type III Type II N/A 5352 72nd Cir Single Renewal Alkis Michaelides 0 Type I 0 Type I Type I N/A 5410 Girard Ave N Single Renewal Cel Monton Llc 17 Type IV 0 Type IV Type II 0 5447 4th St. N Single Renewal Infinite Property LLC 2 Type I 0 Type I Type II N/A 5661 Northport Dr Single Renewal Allan Kemboi Did not meet requirements No CFMH, CPTED or plan 21 Type IV 0 Type IV Type IV 3 5640 Fremont Ave N Single Renewal Cel Monton Llc Met Requirements 5 Type II 0 Type II Type IV N/A 5700 Camden Ave N Single Renewal Danmark Properties Llc Met Requirements 0 Type I 0 Type I Type III N/A 5821 Ewing Ave N Single Renewal Ih2 Property Illinois Lp Met Requirements 1 Type I 0 Type I Type IV N/A 5949 Vincent Ave N Single Renewal Royal Priesthood Llc 18 Type IV 0 Type IV Type II 0 6001 Admiral Pl Single Renewal IH2 PROPERTY BORROWER LP 7 Type III 0 Type III Type I N/A 6113 Quail Ave N Single Renewal SFR ACQUISITIONS 3 LLC Did not meet requirements No CPTED or plan 16 Type IV 0 Type IV Type IV 2 6116 Aldrich Ave N Single Renewal BRIDGE SFR IV SEED BWR LLC 7 Type III 0 Type III Type II N/A 6131 Bryant Ave N Single Renewal Jun Wang & Jinxiu Wang Did not meet requirements No CFMH, CPTED or plan 11 Type IV 0 Type IV Type IV 2 6349 Halifax Ave N Single Renewal Qiang K Fang Met Requirements 6 Type III 0 Type III Type IV N/A 6413 June Ave N Single Renewal Cel Monton Llc 15 Type IV 0 Type IV Type II 0 6418 Major Ave N Single Renewal V Summers & J Summers Did not meet requirements No rental plan 15 Type IV 0 Type IV Type III 0 6701 Scott Ave N Single Renewal Royal Priesthood Llc 13 Type IV 0 Type IV Type II N/A 6725 Bryant Ave N Single Renewal Vong Duong & Ngoc-Kieu Huynh Did not meet requirements No CPTED or plan 15 Type IV 0 Type IV Type IV 3 6800 Fremont Pl N Single Renewal Sharon Mcgary Met Requirements 4 Type II 0 Type II Type IV N/A 6800 Quail Ave N Single Renewal Emmanuel Williams Met Requirements 14 Type IV 0 Type IV Type IV 2 6912 Logan Ave N Single Renewal Hpa Borrower 2017 1 Llc Met Requirements 6 Type III 0 Type III Type IV N/A 6912 Unity Ave N Single Renewal Geri L Williams 25 Type IV 0 Type IV Type I 0 7110 Riverdale Rd Single Renewal Acr Alta Vista Inc 1 Type I 0 Type I Type I N/A 7212 Lee Ave N Single Renewal Qiang K Fang 4 Type II 0 Type II Type I N/A *CFS = Calls for Service for renewal licenses only (Initial licenses are not applicaple to calls for service, and will be listed as N/A) **License type being issued ***Initial licenses will not show a Type I = 3 Year, Type II = 2 Year, Type III = 1 Year, Type IV = 6 months All properties are current on City utilities and property taxes C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:11/13/2023 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :J esse A nders on, C ommunity D evelopment D irector BY:G inny M cI ntosh, City P lanner and Zoning A dminis trator S U B J E C T:Res olu0on regarding P lanning Commission A pplica0on No. 2023-006, S ubmi5ed by AW C H oldings L L C , for Convers ion of an Exis0ng Tw o-Tenant Building to an A pproximately 10,200-S quare Foot Restaurant and Bar (Nightclub) and 704-S quare Foot O utdoor Pa0o (5927 J ohn Mar0n D rive) Requested Council A con: (i) Moon to adopt a resoluon r egar ding P lanning C ommission A pplicaon No. 2023-006, submi!ed by AW C H oldings L LC , for approval of a variance for a 5 9 -space park ing deficiency and condional use permit that w ould allow for the conver sion of an exisng two-tenant building to an appr oximately 10,200-square foot restaur ant and bar (nightclub) w ith 704-square foot outdoor pao at 5927 John M arn D rive, based on the submi!ed findings fact, and as amended by the condions of approval in the resoluon. B ackground: O n O ctober 23, 2 0 2 3 , C ity C ouncil made a mo0on to direct s taff to prepare a r esolu0 on approving a variance as outlined in P lanning Commission A pplica0 on No. 2023-006 for a 5 9 -par king s pace deficiency associated with r elated s ite and building plan and condi0onal use per mit requests that w ould allow for the conversion of an exis0 ng tw o-tenant building to an approximately 10,200-square foot r es taurant and bar (nightclub) w ith 704-square foot outdoor pa0o at 5 9 2 7 J ohn M ar 0n D rive, and s ubj ect to outlined condi0ons of approval. A copy of the P lanning C ommis s ion Report for P lanning C ommis s ion A pplica0 on No. 2023-006, originally dated S eptember 14, 2023, and las t rev is ed O ctober 12, 2023 is included, as w ell as the C ouncil memo provided for the O ctober 23, 2023 mee0ng. A dr aE res olu0on recommending approv al of P lanning Commission A pplica0on No. 2023-006 is als o a5ached for Council considera0on. B udget I ssues: None to cons ider at this 0me. I nclusive C ommunity Engagement: A nracist/Equity Policy Effect: S trategic Priories and Values: Targeted Redevelopment AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip0on U pload D ate Type Res olu0on - Regarding Recommended A pproval of P lanning C ommis s ion A pplica0on No. 2023-006 11/7/2023 Resolu0on Le5er O ctober 23, 2023 Council M emo - P C A pplica0on No. 2023- 006 11/7/2023 Backup M aterial S taff Report and Exhibits - 5927 John M ar0n D rive - Revised (O ctober 12,2023)11/7/2023 Backup M aterial Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2023-006 FOR THE CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TWO-TENANT BUILDING TO AN APPROXIMATELY 10,200-SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT AND BAR (NIGHTCLUB) WITH 704-SQUARE FOOT OUTDOOR PATIO (LOCATED AT 5927 JOHN MARTIN DRIVE) WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2023-006, submitted by AWC Holdings LLC (“the Applicant”) requests review and consideration of an application requesting site and building plan approval for the conversion of an existing two-tenant building located at 5927 John Martin Drive (“the Subject Property”) to an approximately 10,200-square foot restaurant and bar (nightclub) with 704-square foot outdoor patio; and WHEREAS, Section 35-7605 (Amendments) of the City Code stipulates that a major amendment to an approved site and building plan is triggered in situations where there is a 25-percent (%) or greater change to the floor area of any one structure, and the proposal, as contemplated under the submitted application, exceeds this threshold; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is situated in the City’s TOD (Transit-Oriented Development) District, where uses similar to nightclubs, such as, “banquet, event, and conference facilities,” and as outlined under Section 35-4103 (Allowed Use Table), are considered conditional uses in the TOD District where the Subject Property is located; and WHEREAS, outdoor dining for eating establishments may be permitted as a permanent use with a conditional use permit and subject to Section 35-4409 (Temporary Uses and Structures); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota held a duly noticed and called public hearing on September 14, 2023, whereby a planning staff report was presented and public testimony regarding the site and building plan and conditional use permit were received; and WHEREAS, City staff, in consultation with the City Attorney, requested the public hearing be continued to the October 12, 2023 Planning Commission meeting to allow the time necessary for review of a 59-parking space deficiency and the variance deemed necessary to forward the application and a second public hearing notice required for publication and notification to property owners and residents; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota convened at the October 12, 2023 meeting, whereby an updated planning staff report and additional revised material was presented regarding the site and building plan, conditional use permit, and RESOLUTION NO. variance requests, and public testimony regarding the aforementioned requests were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota considered the conditional use permit and variance requests in light of all testimony received, the guidelines and standards for evaluating the conditional use permit contained in Section 35-7700 (Conditional Use Permit) and variance contained in Section 35-71000 (Variance) of the City Code, the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and the Opportunity Site Infrastructure Framework, as well as information provided by the Applicant with respect to the proposed use’s operations, and the request generally satisfies the criteria as outlined within the above Sections; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 35-7604 of the City Code, the City Council finds as follows regarding Planning Commission Application No. 2023-006, submitted by AWC Holdings, LLC: a) The site and building plan fully complies with all applicable requirements of Chapter 35 of the City Code, subject to the variance approved herein; b) The site and building plan adequately protects residential uses from the potential adverse effects of a non-residential use; c) The site and building plan is consistent with the use and character of surrounding properties; and d) The site and building plan provides safe conditions for pedestrians or motorists and prevents the dangerous arrangement of pedestrian and vehicular ways. WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 35-7703 of the City Code, the City Council finds as follows regarding Planning Commission Application No. 2023-006, submitted by AWC Holdings LLC: a) The conditional use, as proposed, will be in accordance with the general objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the City’s Unified Development Ordinance; b) The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will promote or enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, or comfort; c) The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood; d) The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district; e) Adequate measures have been taken to provide ingress, egress, and parking so designated as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets; f) Impacts such as noise, hours of activity, and exterior light will be addressed to mitigate impacts on nearby uses; and g) The conditional use will conform to the applicable regulations of the district in RESOLUTION NO. which it is located; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 35-71003 of the City Code and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.357, subdivision 6, the City Council further finds as follows: a) The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the City’s Unified Development Ordinance; b) The variance is consistent with the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan; c) The Applicant proposes to use the Subject Property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the City’s Unified Development Ordinance; d) The plight of the Applicant is due to circumstances unique to the Subject Property and the parking issues are not created by the Applicant; and e) The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality in which it is located. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that it hereby approves Planning Commission Application No. 2023- 006 for the requested site and building plan, conditional use permit, and variance that would allow for the conversion of an existing two-tenant building to an approximately 10,200-square foot restaurant and bar (nightclub) with 704-square foot outdoor patio for the Subject Property located at 5927 John Martin Drive, conditioned on compliance with all of the following: 1. The 59-parking space variance granted herein allows the proposed use of the Subject Property without needing to strictly comply with the parking requirements in the City’s Unified Development Ordinance. Under no circumstances shall customers or staff be permitted to park off-site on private property or on public streets. 2. A violation of any condition set forth as part of the approval of the conditional use permit (nightclub) or variance shall be a violation of the City’s Unified Development Ordinance and subject to Sections 35-7707 (Revocation) and 35- 71005 (Conditions). 3. Any major changes or modifications made to this site and building plan, and as outlined within the City Code, can only be made by an amendment to the approved site and building plan as approved by the City Council. 4. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits, and with respect to the cursory review comments provided in the Building Official’s memorandum dated October 2, 2023. 5. The Applicant shall work to ensure all applicable Minnesota Fire Code requirements have been met as part of any site plan approval and with respect to the proposed modifications to the building. 6. A fire sprinkler system is required to be installed and shall be maintained on a consistent basis per City Code requirements. RESOLUTION NO. 7. A SAC Determination shall be submitted by the Applicant to the Metropolitan Council and any associated fees paid at time of any permit issuance for the building and outdoor patio uses. 8. Application to and approval from the Hennepin County Health Department for the intended restaurant and bar use. 9. The Applicant shall provide any final site and building plans to City staff for a CPTED review and make alterations as necessary prior to permit release. 10. A revised landscape plan and detailing shall be submitted to ensure compliance with the originally approved landscape plan (1979) and last revised landscape plan (1991), which contemplate a minimum required 108 landscape points for the Subject Property. a. Revise landscape schedule to provide inventory of existing landscape plantings. b. Replace proposed Japanese Barberry with alternate shrubs, to be approved by the City Planner. 11. The Applicant shall ensure an irrigation system is in place or install a new system where necessary to facilitate maintenance of site landscaping and green areas, and irrigation shop drawings for review and approval prior to installation. 12. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view per City Code requirements and a detail sheet provided. a. The existing trash enclosure located at the southwest corner of the Subject Property shall be removed and the area restored. 13. The Applicant shall furnish a plan indicated proposed areas or plans for snow removal and/or storage that does not increase the identified parking deficiency or constrain drive aisles and circulation within the site. 14. The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the Assistant City Engineer’s review memorandum, originally dated September 5, 2023, and revised October 5, 2023. 15. The Applicant shall work with the property owner located at 5939 John Martin Drive (Economic Development Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center) to determine necessity of an amendment or creation of a new covenant and easement for storm sewer, driveway purposes and pedestrian use, and development agreement and covenants for the construction and maintenance of the aforementioned storm sewer and driveway, and with respect to the proposed permanent outdoor patio. 16. Coordinate with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for abandonment and/or removal of the sand and oil interceptor, any trench drains, and any remediation efforts that may be required given the former auto shop use. 17. Application and approval of a City liquor license. 18. Application and approval of a City live entertainment license. 19. The Applicant shall submit a Sign Permit Application for any proposed signage RESOLUTION NO. (e.g., wall, freestanding) and receive issuance of a permit prior to any installation. All signage shall conform to City requirements. November 13, 2023 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Regular Meeng DATE:10/23/2023 TO:City Council FROM:Dr. Reggie Edwards, City Manager THROUGH:Jesse Anderson, Community Development Director BY:Ginny McIntosh, City Planner and Zoning Administrator SUBJECT:Resoluon for Planning Commission Applicaon No. 2023-006, Submied by AWC Holdings LLC, for Conversion of an Exisng Two-Tenant Building to an Approximately 10,200-Square Foot Restaurant and Bar (Nightclub) with 704-Square Foot Outdoor Pao (5927 John Marn Drive) Requested Council Acon: City Council is being asked to consider three alternatives regarding Planning Commission Application No. 2023-006: Approval of Variance, Condional Use Permit, and Site and Building Plan for 5927 John Marn Drive 1. Moon to direct staff to prepare a resoluon approving a variance as outlined in Planning Commission Applicaon No. 2023-006 for the 59-space parking deficiency associated with the conversion of an exisng two-tenant building to an approximately 10,200-square foot restaurant and bar (nightclub) with 704-square foot outdoor pao at 5927 John Marn Drive, and subject to the outlined condions of approval. 2. Moon to direct staff to prepare a resoluon approving the site and building plan and condional use permit as outlined in Planning Commission Applicaon No. 2023-006, which would convert an exisng two-tenant building to an approximately 10,200-square foot restaurant and bar (nightclub) with 704-square foot outdoor pao located at 5927 John Marn Drive, and subject to the outlined condions of approval. Approval of Variance and Denial of Condional Use Permit and Site and Building Plan for 5927 John Marn Drive 1. Moon to direct staff to prepare a resoluon approving a variance as outlined in Planning Commission Applicaon No. 2023-006 for the 59-space parking deficiency associated with the conversion of an exisng two-tenant building to an approximately 10,200-square foot restaurant and bar (nightclub) with 704-square foot outdoor pao at 5927 John Marn Drive, and subject to the outlined condions of approval. An approval of the variance is condioned upon the approval of the site and building plan and condional use permit. 2. Moon to direct staff to prepare a resoluon denying the site and building plan and condional use permit as outlined in Planning Commission Applicaon No. 2023-006, which would convert an exisng two-tenant building to an approximately 10,200-square foot restaurant and bar (nightclub) with 704-square foot outdoor pao located at 5927 John Marn Drive, and subject to the outlined condions of approval. Denial of Variance, Condional Use Permit, and Site and Building Plan for 5927 John Marn Drive 1. Moon to direct staff to prepare a resoluon denying a variance as outlined in Planning Commission Applicaon No. 2023-006 for the 59- space parking deficiency associated with the conversion of an exisng two-tenant building to an approximately 10,200-square foot restaurant and bar (nightclub) with 704-square foot outdoor pao at 5927 John Marn Drive, and subject to the outlined condions of approval. By vong for denial, the parking deficiency (variance) of 59 parking spaces would be denied and due to the denial of the variance, the request for the site and building plan and condional use permit would be denied because the use, in accordance with the site and building plan and condional use permit, would not be in compliance with City Code. Background: AWC Holdings LLC (“the Applicant”) is requesng review and consideraon of a proposal that would convert the existing New King Buffet and former Tires Plus building located at 5927 John Martin Drive (“the Subject Property”) into an approximately 10,200-square foot restaurant and bar (nightclub) with approximately 704-square foot outdoor patio (originally contemplated as an approximately 1,200-square foot patio in the September 14, 2023 report). The Applicant is associated with Jambo Africa, which is a restaurant and bar currently located at 1601 Freeway Boulevard in Brooklyn Center that specializes in African cuisine. The Subject Property is located within the City’s Opportunity Site and is surrounded on three sides by properes owned by the City’s Economic Development Authority and intended for the future build out of the Opportunity Site. In order to proceed, the Applicant requires approval of all three of their requests: site and building plan approval, a condional use permit (for the nightclub use), and a variance that would grant a 59-parking space deficiency. As part of the applicaon process, a public hearing noce was submied to the Brooklyn Center Sun Post for the site and building plan and condional use permit (nightclub) requests on August 31, 2023 and noficaons mailed to those properes and owners located within 350 feet of the Subject Property (12 properes total—including the current owners of the Subject Property and four properes owned by the City’s Economic Development Authority). On September 9, 2023, City staff, in consultaon with the City Aorney, formally requested the Applicant file for a parking variance, in addion to the previously requested site and building plan and condional use permit, and further requested an extension to the 60-day review period, as outlined under Minnesota Statutes Secon 15.99, which was intended to provide the addional me necessary to review the variance and revised applicaon materials, as well as submit a second public noce for the variance. The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the site and building plan and condional use permit requests at their meeng on September 14, 2023 as the hearing had been noced, and per City request, the hearing was connued to October 12, 2023. The second public hearing noce was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on September 28, 2023. Mail noficaons were again sent to those properes and owners located within 350 feet of the Subject Property. The Applicant, their development team, and supporters associated with the Applicant and current Jambo Africa establishment were present for the public hearing on October 12, 2023. City staff was not in receipt of any public comment otherwise. As part of the public hearing process, the Planning Commissioners engaged in a lengthy discussion regarding the proposed use of the Subject Property and outlined the following concerns: 1. Alignment of the proposed use with the City’s Opportunity Site plans and adopted Infrastructure Framework, as the Subject Property is centrally located within this designated area, and consideraons for the nightclub use assuming buildout of the Opportunity Site. General inquiries were presented as to whether the Applicant is on the same page with the City as to where it is headed, and if the Applicant sought out other locaons as opons. 2. Concerns relang to the proposed use already being at and technically beyond capacity and the inability for any future expansion on the Subject Property. 3. ADA parking deficiencies idenfied by City staff and jusficaon in using Uber and Ly to offset parking needs—where might these services stage on-site? Although the staff report noted a 58-parking space deficiency, it was later determined the provided site plan falls short of minimum required ADA parking. MN Accessibility Code requires a minimum of four (4) ADA spaces rather than the two spaces presented, which would ulmately result in a 59-parking space deficiency to accommodate a shared ADA loading space. 4. Snow removal and storage plans for the Subject Property given the Subject Property is built out and the potenal for greater parking deficiencies during the winter months. 5. Lack of any proposed investment into the exterior of the exisng building other than patching of select walls and two glass garage doors. The building is over 40-years old at this me and concerns were expressed as to the accelerated deterioraon of the building within the last few years. 6. Safety concerns relang to egress and parcularly relang to the proposed outdoor pao, which would open out into the parking lot and drive aisle shared with neighboring 5939 John Marn Drive, which is owned by the City’s Economic Development Authority. Commissioner comments referenced past instances of restaurants and nightclubs where stampeding occurred during an emergency and whether proper egress was provided. 7. Inquiries of City staff as to whether they were comfortable with the plans, documentaon, and informaon presented regarding the proposal and whether all outstanding comments would be adequately addressed as part of any approval. 8. General inquiries on the categorizaon of the “nightclub” use and quesons relang to whether the proposed use would conform to the City’s noise regulaons. Quesons were further raised as they relate to the two glass garage doors that would need to remain open for access to the outdoor pao. 9. Addional concerns were noted as they relate to the overall business operaons and consideraons for trash, safety, security, and sufficient lighng given there are no real neighbors at this me. 10. Inquiries with the City Aorney as to how tedious a process of revocaon would be for a condional use permit and authority/oversight granted for condional use permit and variance requests. Following close of the public hearing, the Planning Commission elected to recommend (3-2) City Council approval of the requested site and building plan, condional use permit (nightclub), and parking variance for the Subject Property located at 5927 John Marn Drive and as contemplated under Planning Commission Applicaon No. 2023-006. It should be noted that while one of the Planning Commissioners requested the meeng minutes be included as backup material for City Council, me constraints did not allow for the minutes to be included with this item. The comments provided above have been compiled by City staff following a review of the recording for the October 12, 2023 Planning Commission meeng. A copy of the Planning Commission Report for Planning Commission Applicaon No. 2023-006, originally dated September 14, 2023, and last revised October 12, 2023 is included. City staff requests City Council review and consideraon of the provided materials and the recommended adopon of a moon that would direct City staff to prepare a resoluon for final acon and adopon at the November 13, 2023 City Council meeng. Budget Issues: None to consider at this me. Inclusive Community Engagement: Anracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priories and Values: Targeted Redevelopment ATTACHMENTS: Descripon Upload Date Type Staff Report and Exhibits - 5927 John Marn Drive - Revised (October 12,2023)10/18/2023 Backup Material App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 1 Planning Commission Report Original Meeting Date: September 14, 2023 Revised Meeting Date: October 12, 2023 Application No. 2023-006 Applicant: AWC HOLDINGS LLC Property Owner: Lin Shuang LLC Location: 5927 John Martin Drive, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Requests: Site and Building Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance Map 1. Subject Property Location. Requested Action AWC Holdings LLC (“the Applicant”) is requesting review and consideration of a proposal that would convert the existing New King Buffet and former Tires Plus located at 5927 John Martin Drive (“the Subject Property”) into an approximately 10,200-square foot restaurant and bar (nightclub) with approximately 704- square foot outdoor patio (originally contemplated as an approximately 1,200-square foot patio in the September 14, 2023 report)—Refer to Exhibit A. Jambo Africa, of which the Applicant is associated with, is a restaurant and bar currently located at 1601 Freeway Boulevard in Brooklyn Center that specializes in African cuisine. As is outlined in their narrative, they would transfer, “all restaurant operations from the current location, 1601 Freeway Blvd, to the new location, 5927 John Martin Drive.” • Application Filed: 08/23/2023 • Review Period (60-day) Deadline: 10/22/2023 • Extension Declared: Yes • Extended Review Period Deadline: 12/23/2023 App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 2 City staff initially became aware of the proposal following a request by the Applicant to apply for a plumbing permit. Following discussion on the reasonings for the permit, City staff was made aware of the Applicant’s intent to open a new restaurant at 5927 John Martin Drive (Subject Property). City staff held an in-person meeting with the Applicant and other representatives on July 19, 2023 to discuss their plans, at which time they reiterated plans to purchase the Subject Property and convert the existing two-tenant building into what would be an approximately 10,200-square foot restaurant and bar use. Based on information provided at the time, City staff determined the approval of a new site and building plan would be required to forward the proposal, as the renovation of the existing restaurant space and expansion into the adjacent former Tires Plus space would require a major site and building plan amendment under Section 35-7605 (Amendments) of the City Code, which is triggered by a 25-percent (%) or greater change in the floor area of any one structure. On August 15, 2023 (Planning Commission Application deadline), City staff held a follow up meeting with the Applicant to discuss the application and submittal materials. Although the plans were discussed, no hardcopy plan sets or .pdfs were provided to City staff in advance of or at this time. City staff ultimately reviewed the application materials submitted at the end of the day and determined that the proposal had changed from what was initially conveyed as a restaurant and bar use to a nightclub (i.e. VIP area and back entry, stage, DJ, green room). This is noteworthy as there are additional requirements (i.e. conditional use permit) and considerations as part of any approval under City Code. City staff expressed their confusion as to the changes in an email to the Applicant on August 15, 2023 and noted the Applicant would need to apply for a conditional use permit in addition to the site and building plan as uses similar to “banquet, event, and conference facilities” are considered conditional uses in the TOD (Transit-Oriented Development) District where the Subject Property is located. On August 16, 2023 the Applicant’s architect confirmed that the proposal, as contemplated under Planning Commission Application No. 2023-006, should be classified as a “nightclub” and indicated they would revise their plans and provide additional information addressing the criteria for conditional use permits and as outlined under Section 35-7700 (Conditional Use Permits) and 35-7703 (Conditional Use Permit Criteria). As part of the application process, a public hearing notice was submitted to the Brooklyn Center Sun Post for publication on August 31, 2023 (Exhibit B), and notices were mailed to property owners and actual locations within 350 feet of the Subject Property. A link to the public hearing notice was also published on the City’s website. It should be noted that while this area is largely under-developed, the Subject Property is located within the City’s designated Opportunity Site. Following an initial review of the Planning Commission application submittal, City staff determined there was a notable parking deficiency, which is detailed later in the staff report. Based on this, and in consultation with the City Attorney, City staff requested the Applicant subsequently file for a parking variance, in addition to the previously requested site and building plan and conditional use permit. As a public hearing notice was already published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post for the site and building plan and conditional use permit requests, a separate application request for the variance and public hearing notice was deemed necessary to forward the application submittal. City staff requested the Applicant confirm their intent to file for the aforementioned variance no later than September 13, 2023, provide all necessary fees, address the variance criteria as outlined under Section 35-7103, and provide additional detailing and revised plans based on the review conducted to date. App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 3 The City Attorney advised City staff that all application requests (i.e. site and building plan, conditional use permit, and variance) be reviewed at the same meeting. City staff also requested an extension to the 60-day review period, and as outlined under Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, which provided the additional time necessary to review the variance and revised materials—refer to Exhibit C. With that said, City staff initially prepared a staff report based on all information and plans provided as of August 23, 2023, which was presented at a public hearing scheduled for September 14, 2023. It was at that meeting that City staff requested the Planning Commission continue the public hearing to October 12, 2023 to allow the time necessary for a second public hearing notice to be published in the newspaper for the variance and all requests to be contemplated under a revised staff report. A public hearing notice for the variance request was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on September 28, 2023. Existing Conditions App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 4 Image 1. Existing Site Conditions at Subject Property. Background The Subject Property originally received site and building plan approval in 1979 under Planning Commission Application No. 79035 for what was originally a Berger Brothers sporting goods shop. As originally contemplated, the building was to primarily serve as an approximately 8,820-square foot retail shop, with approximately 1,425-square feet of storage area. At the time, the Subject Property was zoned C2 (Commerce) District, which allowed for retail uses, and contemplated 85 on-site parking spaces for the retail store. In 1991, the formerly single use retail building received a proposal to convert into a two-tenant building when a Tires Plus auto shop expressed interest in locating on the Subject Property and following closure of Berger Brothers. Tires Plus ultimately took approximately 3,700-square feet of the west side of the Subject Property’s building, with the remaining approximately 6,500-square feet left available for a new user. In reviewing City records, it appears a Certificate of Occupancy was issued for the short-term storage of merchandise for Kohl’s (1994) and another restaurant/buffet appears to have occupied the space in the late 1990s, and prior to New King Buffet taking on the other space. The current Property Owner, Lin Shuang LLC, purchased the property in 2007, and Tires Plus closed their location at the Subject Property last year, which left New King Buffet as the sole occupant. The Subject Property was listed for sale shortly thereafter. The Subject Property is centrally located within the City’s designated approximately 80-acre Opportunity Site. A draft Opportunity Site Master Plan has been underway for a number of years and at present the plans are to move towards final adoption by end of this year. In July 2021, the City of Brooklyn Center City Council adopted an Infrastructure Framework for the Opportunity Site, which is intended to serve as a proactive, guiding document and is focused on four core components (stormwater, access and connectivity, parks and open space, and land use) within the Opportunity Site. While the Framework is intended to help inform decision making, it was also designed to provide certain flexibilities dependent upon market conditions. In 2022, an approximately 16-acre Phase I redevelopment of the Opportunity Site was approved by City Council under Planning Commission Application No. 2022-003—this phase is located south of the Subject Property. As part of the Opportunity Site Infrastructure Framework, a proposed Garden Street is contemplated to run approximately between the Subject Property and 5939 John Martin Drive, which is App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 5 owned by the City’s Economic Development Authority (EDA), and south through additional lands owned by the City’s EDA (approximately 5.5 acres of 5910 Shingle Creek Parkway) before connecting to a proposed public roadway extension approved as part of Phase I. The below map is intended to convey areas of the Opportunity Site that would be covered by the approved semi-regional stormwater ponding located within the Phase I development; however, it also lays out general block patterns and new roadway connections. The Infrastructure Framework specifically denotes John Martin Drive, of which the Subject Property fronts, as a future “Main Street.” While dependent on market conditions and the receptivity of existing land owners, the Infrastructure Framework calls out a potential future road (Garden Street—Refer to Image 3 below) running in proximity to the existing driveway curb cut, which serves both the Subject Property and 5939 John Martin Drive (City EDA). Image 2. Aerial Map Noting Location of Subject Property (in red) in Relation to Infrastructure Framework for Connectivity. App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 6 Image 3. Access and Connectivity Framework for the Opportunity Site (Subject Property—in red). Site Data: 2040 Land Use Plan: Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Neighborhood: Centennial Current Zoning: Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) District Site Area: Approximately 1.36 acres Surrounding Area: Direction 2040 Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use North C-MU (Commercial Mixed Use) MX-C (Commercial Mixed-Use) Commercial (Restaurant Depot | Strip Mall) South TOD (Transit-Oriented Development) TOD | PUD/TOD (Planned Unit Development/Transit- Oriented Development) Office (Brooklyn Center Community Schools Administrative Offices | Brooklyn Center Early College Academy | Centaur Beginnings Childcare) | Undeveloped (City of Brooklyn Center EDA) East TOD (Transit-Oriented Development) TOD Undeveloped (City of Brooklyn Center EDA/former Perkins site) West TOD (Transit-Oriented Development) TOD Undeveloped (City of Brooklyn Center EDA/former St. Louis Park Clinic) | Office (Jani-King) App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 7 REQUESTS SITE AND BUILDING PLAN Image 4. Revised Site Plan for Subject Property. App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 8 Site Design As was noted in the Background, the Applicant originally sought out information on the process to apply for plumbing permits; however, it was later determined that the Applicant’s intent to convert the existing New King Buffet and former Tires Plus into an approximately 10,200-square foot restaurant and bar would trigger a major site and building plan amendment under Section 35-7605 (Major Amendments), which notes that, “the review of major amendments shall follow the procedure set forth above for the issuance of a new site and building plan approval.” The Applicant outlines in their narrative that they would remodel the existing approximately 10,200- square foot building for a restaurant and bar with nightclub. There are no plans to alter the exterior of the building other than the removal of an existing loading door on the south elevation, and the existing overhead bay doors used previously by Tires Plus on the west elevation—these areas would be repaired to match the adjacent wall materials with select transom glass and two retractable glass garage doors. This elevation would also feature an outdoor patio, which was modified between the plans originally reviewed at the September 14, 2023 Planning Commission meeting and this staff report from approximately 1,200-square feet to approximately 704-square feet. This patio would be surrounded by an 8-foot fence (wall) with two exit gates. In reviewing the original approvals under Planning Commission Application No. 79035, it appears the Subject Property and neighboring 5939 John Martin Drive, now owned by the City’s Economic Development Authority (EDA) but formerly home to a St. Louis Park Medical Clinic location, were to share a 30-foot wide common driveway/curb cut that was to be divided evenly between properties down the drive aisle. The report references common roadway agreements that would be necessary to forward the project at the time. City staff reviewed the records on file and did identify documentation outlining a covenant intended to create easements for storm sewer, ingress and egress for driveway purposes, and pedestrian use. No mention is made either in the Planning Commission report or covenants and agreements for any kind of shared parking situation; therefore, it is City staff’s interpretation that all available parking is limited to what is available on the Subject Property, with no rights to the neighboring EDA-owned property’s parking areas. Traffic | Access |Circulation | Connection Access to the Subject Property is limited to the single shared curb cut located off John Martin Drive. As proposed, the existing curb cut and parking layout would remain. The only area proposed for modification, which could potentially impact the existing site circulation in the future is the west elevation where the bay doors to the former Tires Plus are located. The original submittal initially contemplated an approximately 1,200-square foot outdoor patio. This patio has since been revised down to approximately 704-square feet to align with the existing curb. The patio’s width has also been altered, which minimizes, but does not eliminate impacts on the adjacent EDA-owned property. It should be noted that the revised patio provides approximately 16 feet of drive aisle clearance before reaching the existing property line. Although this is a shared drive, installation of the permanent patio would permanently shift any vehicular traffic onto neighboring 5939 John Martin Drive, which is owned by the City’s EDA. Although this is not currently a concern as the site is not actively under development, there will likely be constraints to consider when it redevelops and in consideration of the Infrastructure Framework, which outlines a proposed road in proximity to this drive. City Code outlines a minimum of 24-feet in width for drive aisles accommodating two-way traffic, and a minimum of 20 feet is required under Minnesota Fire Code for fire App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 9 access purposes. There have been examples of roadways with less width; however, this is conditioned upon sufficient fire coverage being provided for a building. The Applicant has requested that this section of drive aisle be considered as “one-way” drive. Under City Code, permanent outdoor seating for eating establishments may be permitted as a permanent use in conjunction with a conditional use permit. In situations where no grade separation is provided between vehicular traffic and the outdoor dining area, permanent railings or fencing shall be provided around the dining area—the Applicant notes the installation of an 8-foot fence (wall) as part of their proposal. City staff did note that the proposed gates open inward as opposed to outward, which requires revision. Assuming the gate swing was adjusted, and in case of an emergency, the gates would open out into the drive aisle, with no protection for those exiting from any vehicular traffic. These areas should be revised to allow for an area of refuge and to comply with any code requirements. Image 5. Existing Access, Parking, and Circulation on Subject Property | Revised Approximately 704-SF Outdoor Patio. Parking When City staff initially met with the Applicant, the Applicant conveyed a proposed restaurant and bar use; however, upon further review of the provided plan sets, it was later determined that the proposal would also function as a nightclub. Clear determination of use and overall business function is crucial as it informs actual peak parking demands. Section 35-5502 (Off-Street Parking Requirements) provides that, “off-street parking and loading spaces shall be provided in all multi-family residential, mixed-use, commercial, and industrial districts in accordance with the requirements of this Unified Development Ordinance.” City staff relayed concerns early on as to whether all minimum parking needs would be met on-site given the use and size of establishment and the Applicant’s inquiries on potential options for parking off-site, including surrounding EDA-owned property. App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 10 There are provisions within City Code that allow for a development to reduce the required off-street parking spaces by up to fifty percent (50%) when it can be demonstrated in a parking-traffic study prepared consistent with City standards, and through the use of transit or demand management programs, noted special characteristics, etc. A parking-traffic study was not provided as part of the submittal. Section 35-5503 (Shared Parking) allows for a portion of required parking spaces to be located on an adjacent property if the parking area complies with the standards and as authorized in accordance with approval of a conditional use permit (CUP). Although shared parking is encouraged in instances where it may be mutually beneficial for multiple users, City Code requires a burden of proof for a reduction in the total number of parking spaces and only in instances where: 1) A sufficient number of spaces is provided to meet the highest demand of the participating uses; 2) Evidence has been submitted by the parties operating the shared parking facility, to the satisfaction of the zoning administrator, documenting the nature of uses and the times when the individual uses will operate so as to demonstrate the lack of potential conflict between them; 3) The shared parking spaces will not be located in excess of 800 feet from the further most point of the space to the front door, or other viable building entrance as approved by the zoning administrator, of the use they are intended to serve; 4) Accessory off-site parking shall be located such that pedestrian traffic will not be required to cross a major thoroughfare as defined in Section 35-9200; 5) A shared parking agreement is submitted and reviewed as to form by the city attorney and addressing the provisions outlined under Section 35-9200.5; 6) The approved shared parking agreement shall be filed with the application for a zoning certificate or site plan and shall be recorded at Hennepin County in a manner as to encumber all properties involved in the shared parking agreement; 7) No zoning certificate will be issued until proof of recordation of the agreement is provided to the zoning administrator; and 8) Site improvements to ensure adequate lighting and pedestrian access between the shared parking and primary use may be required as a condition of approval by the City Council. The Subject Property is surrounded on three sides by City EDA-owned property (5939 and 5915 John Martin Drive, and approximately 5.5 acres of 5910 Shingle Creek Parkway). HealthPartners Dental Clinic (5901 John Martin Drive) is located to the south; however, the majority of its on-site parking is located on yet another City EDA-owned property located at 5900 Shingle Creek Parkway via a driveway and parking easement. This parcel is also part of the Phase I Opportunity Site redevelopment. The Applicant inquired as to whether off-site parking might be an option at the strip mall located to the northwest of the Subject Property and located at 6000 and 6050 Shingle Creek Parkway; however, these properties are part of a Reciprocal Easement Agreement (REA) with the neighboring former Target, located at 6100 Shingle Creek Parkway and also owned by the City’s EDA. Said agreement provides shared parking and access between parcels with the majority of parking located on the Target site. Although the Economic Development Authority (EDA) of the City of Brooklyn Center ultimately makes final decisions on the usage of land under ownership of the EDA, these lands have specifically been acquired in anticipation of the Opportunity Site redevelopment and historically, EDA lands have been conveyed for uses that will provide for the highest and best use given a particular zoning district and in alignment with the City’s guiding documents and strategic policies. App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 11 The above information is addressed if only to convey that there appear to be limited opportunities for off- site parking and to accommodate the Applicant’s identified parking needs. While there may be future opportunities for on-street parking as part of the Opportunity Site buildout and Main Street concept outlined in the adopted Infrastructure Framework, there are no known plans for this in the near future. The parking requirements are further detailed later under the Variance request portion of this report. Image 6. Submitted Sheet A1-300 (Square Footage Allocations for Proposed Use). As proposed, no alterations would be made to the existing parking lot other than select re-striping. The submitted plans denote 80 available on-site parking spaces on the Subject Property. The original site and App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 12 building plan approvals, as contemplated under Planning Commission Application No. 79035, identified 85 parking spaces; however, it appears five (5) parking spaces were removed to accommodate a trash enclosure located at the southeast corner of the building and intended for the current restaurant use. The Applicant originally provided an occupancy load breakdown for the proposed restaurant and bar (nightclub) use and noted the following: With the reduction in size of the outdoor patio, the occupant loads were updated slightly from the original 240 occupants to 213 occupants (see below): City staff and the Applicant were not in agreeance as to the determination of minimum parking needs for the Subject Property. The Applicant’s architect had operated under the assumption that the entirety of the use would have parking calculated assuming a nightclub or “Assembly” calculation, which would assume a minimum of one (1) parking space for every three (3) seats/persons, including any staff. In reviewing the provided occupancy load calculations for the space, a maximum occupant load of 240 persons would have indeed require a minimum of 80 parking spaces; however, it appears the occupant load numbers were adjusted with respect to the dining, patio, and dance floor areas to calculate occupancy based off the provided layout of the tables and seating, as opposed to the occupant load as calculated under Minnesota Building Code. App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 13 In calculating minimum parking requirements, it should be noted that rarely is the occupant load used as the only source for calculating parking in assembly scenarios. City staff reviewed the architect’s calculations for occupancy load (including assumed staffing), requested a separate calculation of occupancy load by the City Building Official, and asked the Applicant to provide a narrative and answer the conditional use permit criteria questions (as outlined later in this report) to gain a better understanding as to how the business might operate, peak usage based on potential events, etc. Additional staffing information is provided as part of the newly provided business summary and variance criteria questions in Exhibit A. City staff also reached out to a neighboring municipality (Brooklyn Park) for a second opinion. They too confirmed that they would calculate the proposed use based on function because it would ultimately provide the best estimate with respect to the actual demand for parking, rather than utilizing the most restrictive calculation for the entirety of the space. Occupant Areas Eating Establishment (1:2) Assembly (1:3) Main Level Seating 93-175 occupants Patio (Seasonal)—Revised 28-47 occupants Dance Floor 66-107 occupants DJ/Stage 12-18 occupants Kitchen Staff 4 occupants Bartenders (Service Only) 4 occupants Bar (Standing) 17 occupants Office | Entry | Mezzanine 6 occupants TOTAL 135-236 occupants 95-142 occupants Minimum Parking Range 68-118 spaces (93) 32-48 spaces (45) Table 1. Revised Interpretation of Occupancies and Use Areas to Determine Minimum Parking on Subject Property. In reviewing the provided plan sets, City staff noted the plans assumed no one would be standing at the bar and that the bar would be for service (4 bartenders) only; however, in calculating occupancy and even determining potential Met Council Sewer Availability Charges (SAC), this area is to be accounted for. Further, in reviewing the operation of the use, it was presumed that those on the dance floor, who might not have dedicated seating in the dining areas/VIP seating would likely walk up to the bar to place their drink order. The Building Official measured the bar area and presumed 17 occupants at 1 person for every 5 square feet, which is the calculation used for standing. City staff noted only a small area appeared to be dedicated for the dance floor (330 square feet or 66 occupants). The plans represent a large amount of square footage dedicated to hallway area (which does not count towards occupancy), and there appears to be a general disconnect from the stage area. City staff re-measured the area with the assumption that a minimum 36-inch hallway corridor be maintained on either end of the stage and seated dining/VIP seating areas and ultimately calculated an approximately 750-square foot dance floor. The Building Official assumed 7 square feet per person given the dancing area, hence a max occupancy of 107 in the above Table 1. It should be noted that in the newly provided business summary that they plan to use a “dance floor made up of digital floor panels,” hence their determination that all dancing would be limited to the noted 330 square feet. With respect to the proposed patio and dining areas, City staff noted an occupant load was provided; however, an assumption of occupancy was made given the seating plan (tables and chairs) provided. While this can serve as a good gauge of occupancy, it is also dependent upon several factors, including App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 14 whether the seating is fixed or not. Given this, Table 1 above notes a bottom range that assumes the architect’s seating plans and a top range based off building occupancy load for these areas. In determining minimum parking needs, City staff assumed a mid-range for calculating the dining and outdoor patio areas. The provided narrative notes that Jambo Africa offers full-service, dine-in, take out, and delivery via several online entities such as Uber Eats, Chow-Now, and Doordash. They also provide off-site catering. Hours of operation are provided in the narrative and note the following: Monday-Wednesday 11 a.m. to midnight Thursday-Sunday 11 a.m. to 2 a.m. City staff requested additional information regarding business operations, which was provided in the business summary (Exhibit A). The Applicant notes the provision of a security team that is to be on-site for all nightly activities, Thursday through Sunday. It should be noted that security staffing is not accounted for in the above Table 1 under staffing, and although the Applicant notes they utilize a “carpool policy” for their staff, no information is provided as to how security staff (estimated at between 4-7 staff) arrives. As no breakdown of operations was provided for the restaurant and nightclub, and as the designated dining area is also noted as a “VIP seating” area, City staff assumed both areas would be open to customers during these times. Assuming 80 on-site parking spaces, City staff initially determined in the original submittal, which contemplated the approximately 1,200-square foot outdoor patio, that the Subject Property was likely deficient by 74 parking spaces and would therefore require a parking variance. City staff conferred with the City Attorney as a public hearing was published for the site and building plan and conditional use permit requests in the August 31, 2023 Sun Post edition. City staff was directed to issue a letter outlining any missing information, the necessity and request for a variance, and an additional request to extend the 60-day review period for an additional 60-days as provided for under Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99— Refer to Exhibit C. In reviewing the revised plan submittal with the reduced outdoor patio of approximately 704-square feet, it appears the Subject Property is deficient by 58 parking spaces, which would still require the necessity of a parking variance. It should be noted that neither determination considers any parking needs for security staff and does not contemplate the Applicant’s “car pool policy” as the City does not have language within its Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) to account for such. This area is fairly isolated and while there is public transit, the closest stop is local (722 line). Additional service routes are available off Shingle Creek Parkway and Bass Lake Road (County Road 10) or at the Transit Center. It is more likely customers would either use a ride-share service (e.g. Uber, Lyft) or carpool. A site plan is provided (Sheet A1-100); however, no dimensions are provided that note parking space dimensions, drive aisle widths and alterations (assuming the proposed outdoor patio). As noted in the Assistant City Engineer’s memo, it also appears the ADA parking is insufficient. Should additional ADA loading spaces be required, this may increase the overall parking deficiency. The Applicant noted in their revised responses that ADA parking requirements are not outlined in the City Unified Development Ordinance; however, these are and have always been calculated using the Minnesota Accessibility Code. App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 15 Lighting A photometric plan was submitted with the application submittal; however, the originally provided plan did not provide the detailing necessary to determine whether it meets the code provisions as outlined under Section 35-5400 (Exterior Lighting). In response to a request for revised plans, the Applicant did provide an updated photometric plan and fixture specification on September 13, 2023; however, this plan still does not meet the City’s requirements. With that said, any photometric plan provided shall clearly demonstrate consistent levels of illumination across the existing open-air parking lot and avoid pockets of very low or high levels of illumination. Spot illuminations shall be provided to clearly demonstrate adherence to minimum and maximum illumination levels, as well as uniformity, proposed mounting heights for wall and parking lot lighting. The Applicant did provide fixture specifications; however, no detailing is provided as to the mounting heights, locations on the property, etc. The submitted wall fixtures, unless installed near the rear (south) loading and service areas, do not comply with City Code and will require revision. City staff had previously conveyed that wall- packs were not permitted. Detail sheets were also requested of the Applicant to demonstrate enhanced illumination over all primary building entrances/exits and any pedestrian path ways as outlined under Section 35-5401.m.2 (Lighting Standards). Given the intended hours of operation (Monday through Wednesday-11 a.m. to midnight, and Thursday through Sunday-11 a.m. to 2 a.m.) and the related conditional use permit request for the nightclub use, City staff is cognizant of potential safety concerns surrounding the existing lighting on-site and as this area is fairly isolated. The Subject Property abuts three vacant parcels of land owned by the City’s Economic Development Authority (EDA), and the other users within proximity operate primarily in the daytime hours (i.e. HealthPartners Dental Clinic, Brooklyn Center School District administrative offices, Early College Academy and Centaur Beginnings Childcare, Jani-King, and Restaurant Depot). Image 7. Revised Photometric Plan for the Subject Property. App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 16 Following a review of the revised photometric plan in Image 7 above, City staff noted areas of high illumination along the building where existing wall-packs are located (in green and blue colors), and in the general area of an existing freestanding sign, which has a spotlight attached and oriented toward the parking lot. The darker colors (dark blue, red, and purple colors) denote areas of lower illumination levels. This is likely due in part to the Subject Property not have any existing pole lights in the parking lot, with the exception of two, non-conforming globe lights on the north end of the Subject Property—refer to Image 8 below. Image 8. Existing Non-Conforming Lighting on Subject Property (circled in red). Trash | Screening No trash plans were provided with the proposal. There is currently a trash enclosure located at the southeast corner of the building that is intended to serve the existing New King Buffet restaurant space. This enclosure also appears to hold an above ground grease tank. This area was originally approved for five (5) parking spaces, but with the transition from a sole tenant to two tenant use, separate trash enclosures were installed. The other existing trash enclosure is located at the southwest corner of the Subject Property and is not currently utilized given the closure of Tires Plus, which occupied the other tenant space. This trash enclosure appears to be in poor condition and is likely unnecessary with a proposed conversion back to a single use; therefore, City staff would request its removal—Refer to Image 9 below. Image 9. Existing Trash Enclosures—New King Buffet (Left) and Former Tires Plus (Right). There appear to be additional enclosures located off the former Tires Plus space, which were likely for App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 17 used tire storage. The submitted plans denote no plans to remove the enclosures, although the south loading door (as depicted in Image 8 below) would be patched to match the existing concrete exterior. Image 10. Existing Enclosures for Former Tires Plus—to Remain. All ground mounted equipment over 30-inches in height or greater than 12-cubic feet (e.g., transformers, mechanical) shall be effectively screened from public view. Similarly, roof-mounted equipment shall also be screened from view through use of parapets, wall/ fencing materials, or paint compatible and complementary to the building. Architectural Materials There are no plans to alter the exterior of the building, with the exception of adjustments to openings on the west and south elevations. As proposed, and as noted above, an existing loading dock door would be removed and patched to match the existing exterior. While the provided site plan notes this removal and patching, a detail sheet would be required for submittal as part of any building permit process. The west elevation currently features a series of garage bay doors that formerly served Tires Plus. As proposed, four (4) of the garage bay doors would be removed and replaced with smaller, transom-style windows. The remaining sections below would be patched. Although this elevation notes the use of “squared” concrete block to match the existing material, it appears the building material that this elevation is predominately comprised of is split rib or fluted concrete. City staff would request confirmation as it appears there is squared or scored concrete block located in section of the south elevation of the building—refer to Image 10 above. The remaining two (2) garage bay doors would be replaced with operable (retractable) glass garage doors that would lead out onto a revised 704-square foot outdoor patio. Said patio would be surrounded by an 8-foot high fence (wall). Refer to Image 11 below. City staff question the functionality of the proposed outdoor patio, as it appears the only access would be via the garage door (with no separate side door access). Additional safety concerns were raised in the letter addressed to the Applicant on September 9, 2023 regarding the identified gates for exiting, as they would open out onto the parking lot and drive aisles. Although the patio size has since been reduced in size, it appears the two gates open inward as opposed to outward and directly into the drive aisle and parking areas, which is a safety concern. App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 18 Image 11. Existing and Proposed Alterations to the West Elevation of the Subject Property Building. City Code requires no less than 60-percent face brick, natural or colored stone, pre-colored or factory stained or stained on site textured pre-cast concrete panels, textured concrete block, stucco, glass, fiberglass, or similar materials. As proposed, this requirement would likely be met, although City staff requests an elevation-by-elevation percentage breakdown of materials for record purposes. Landscaping The project submittal includes a landscape plan and detail sheet; however, no inventory of existing plantings and species/types was provided and City staff was unable to conduct a full review. City staff did make a formal request to the Applicant for this additional information as part of a letter dated September 9, 2023. City staff provided the Applicant with copies of the original and last revised landscape plans on file and as included with the preceding Planning Commission and City approvals on record from 1979 and 1991. These plans denote a minimum required 108 landscape points, which shall be satisfied by the Applicant. City staff also reviewed the provided landscape plan against the City’s Unified Development Ordinance and specifically Section 35-5600 (Landscaping, Screening, and Fences). Image 12. Provided Landscape Schedule for the Subject Property. App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 19 It appears there are 19 existing plantings on the Subject Property at this time. As proposed, the Applicant would replace missing black hills spruce, skyline (honey) locust, and hackberry trees, all of which appear to be native to Minnesota, on the Subject Property. For shrubs, the Applicant proposes to replace missing juniper and Japanese green leaf barberry. Following a review of these plantings, which were all outlined on the original 1979 landscape plan schedule, City staff requests the Applicant replace the Japanese green leaf barberry with an alternate shrub, as the Minnesota DNR notes “Japanese Barberry” as a restricted planting with the propagation and sale of its numerous cultivars, including green barberry, noted as prohibited within the state of Minnesota. A revised landscape plan was submitted to City staff on October 10, 2023; however, staff has not had time to review the revised plans. Review and approval of the landscape plan would be a requested condition of any City approval. Although City staff has directed the Applicant to work off the originally approved and last revised landscape plans, which were reviewed on a point basis, the Applicant might also use the opportunity to explore opportunities to promote species diversity and resilience. The new landscaping requirements, which became effective in 2023, outline that no more than 40-percent of the total number of trees may be of the same species and that any landscape vegetation should utilize native and resilient plant types where possible in order to promote landscape resiliency and reduce site maintenance requirements. As has long been required, underground irrigation is also required for installation and maintenance. Signs No specific signage requests were made as part of the Application submittal. The Subject Property currently has existing wall signage and one (1) freestanding sign located on the Subject Property at this time. Any new signage would be required to comply with the provisions outlined within Section 35-6000 (Signs). Engineering Review James Soltis, Assistant City Engineer, initially reviewed the submitted site plan and provided a memorandum dated September 5, 2023. This memo has since been revised to reflect the updated plans— this revised memo is dated October 5, 2023 (Exhibit D). Memo comments addressed include deficiencies in available accessible parking, and additional detailing with respect to the proposed safety considerations for the patio in relation to the adjacent drive aisle. Building Review Building Official Dan Grinsteinner conducted a cursory review of the proposal in a memorandum dated October 2, 2023 (Exhibit E) and worked with City staff through a determination of outlined and expected occupancy loads for the building and patio and with respect to the minimum required parking. A fire sprinkler and monitoring system is required for installation and is to be maintained at all times, and sufficient fire hydrants shall be provided. Additional detailing will be required to provide access to a fire sprinkler room or wall connections. The Applicant will also need to meet any minimum ADA requirements with regard to the building and site improvements, and prior to issuance of any building permits, a SAC determination shall be submitted to the Metropolitan Council and any associated fees shall be paid at time of permit issuance. Given the restaurant use, City staff conversed with the Applicant on any proposed plans for a grease interceptor, as it does not appear the existing building has one. Per the provided memorandum, a grease interceptor will App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 20 be required to prevent any potential future blocking of City sanitary lines. The Applicant will also need to coordinate with Hennepin County Health Department for any approvals for the restaurant use, and with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for the abandonment of any flammable interceptors. Ultimately, building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. CPTED Review City staff requests that as part of any construction set review and in advance of any permit release, a CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Design) review be completed by City staff. Other Considerations As is noted above, the Applicant would need to coordinate with MPCA to address any abandonment of any flammable interceptors/oil and sand separators, City staff requests the Applicant coordinate with MPCA regarding any regulations they might have and given the proposed improvements. In reviewing the MPCA’s “What’s in my Neighborhood?” map, which is a publicly accessible map, it appears there is an active item for “aboveground tanks” (MPCA ID: TS0055275) associated with the former Tires Plus, which was located on the Subject Property. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT As noted in the beginning of the staff report, City staff initially met with the Applicant, where it was conveyed that the Applicant intended to open a restaurant and bar at the Subject Property; however, at time of initial application submittal (August 15, 2023) and upon a cursory review of the interior renovations City staff determined that the restaurant and bar layout contained a dance floor, large stage, green room, and dedicated DJ area. The original plans also denoted “VIP seating” on certain plan sheets and a “VIP back reception” off the rear entrance, which is now noted as a “back entry foyer.” At the time, the plan sets also only contemplated the main level dining area seating, outdoor patio, kitchen, bar (bartenders only, not service), office, and VIP back reception areas for occupancy purposes, but assigned no occupancies for the dance area, bar (service area), or stage/green room areas for a total of 160 occupants. These occupancies have since been revised. City staff emailed the Applicant the same day the plans were received with respect to the use and proposed occupancies and received a response on August 16, 2023 from the Applicant’s architect, agreeing with City staff’s interpretation that there was a “nightclub” component and clarifying that, under building code, restaurants and nightclubs were in the same occupancy type category. They further agreed to update the submitted plans to reflect updates to the occupancies to better evaluate minimum parking needs and apply for a conditional use permit. Conditional use permits, as outlined under Section 35-7700, are those uses which have been identified, because of their nature, operation, location, special requirements or characteristics, and that may only be allowed in a particular zoning district after submittal of an application, review, and recommendation by the Planning Commission, and approval by the City Council. The conditional use permit process regulates: the location, magnitude, and design of conditional uses consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and the regulations, purposes, and procedures of this Unified App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 21 Development Ordinance. A conditional use permit may not be granted by the City Council unless the following criteria have been satisfied (Note: Applicant responses transcribed from submitted narrative—Exhibit A): a. The conditional use will be in accordance with the general objectives, or with any specific objective, of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and this UDO. Applicant Response: Certainly. We would not operate without being in full accordance with City Plans. City Staff Response (Finding): The Subject Property is located within the City’s new Transit- Oriented Development (TOD) District, and is also future guided as Transit-Oriented Development under the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The TOD zoning district and future land use designation of TOD are brand new to the City as of 2023 and 2019, respectively. The purpose of the TOD District, as outlined under the City’s Unified Development Ordinance (Section 35-2304), is to, “support opportunities for dense, transit-supportive and transit-oriented development. The TOD District requires intensities and patterns of development that support vibrant pedestrian activity, and discourages land uses and development patterns that could decrease walkability or interfere with future growth of transit-oriented development and transit ridership. The District intends to promote sustainable urban places that include places to live, work, shop, and recreate, reduce reliance on automobiles, and encourage the use of public transit. The District intends to foster job creation and economic growth in near-proximity to transit, and provides citizens with new housing and lifestyle choices with a high level of amenities and spaces for social interaction.” Although the Subject Property contains an existing building with no plans for building expansion/alteration, the building and design standards for the TOD District emphasize overall pedestrian friendliness (e.g. placement of buildings towards the property lines to promote pedestrian access, provision and placement of parking to promote density, minimum heights, provision of gathering spaces). As the Subject Property is located within the City’s designated Opportunity Site, City staff reviewed the Opportunity Site Infrastructure Framework, which was adopted by City Council in July 2021 under City Council Resolution No. 2021-90. This Framework is a foundational component to the Opportunity Site Master Plan process, which is anticipated to wrap up by the end of 2023, and outlines guidance regarding land use, road network, public space network, and stormwater systems. Adoption of this Framework was critical to preserving and progressing the Opportunity Site Master Plan process because absent cohesive, site-wide policy guidance, the City would be severely limited in its ability to align private property reuse or redevelopment in the Opportunity Site with city and community goals through a development review process. Further, it lays out site-wide infrastructure planning, including future proposed road connections, and in general, this Framework supports implementation of the City of Brooklyn Center’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, upon which the Master Plan has been based. With respect to the proposed outdoor patio, outdoor seating for eating establishments may be permitted as a permanent use with approval of a conditional use permit. As such, certain App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 22 additional restrictions are outlined under Section 35-4409.g.3 (Temporary Uses and Structures— Outdoor Seating for Cafes or Restaurants). These standards specifically note that, “an outdoor dining area may be allowed accessory and incidental to a restaurant with indoor eating area on the same site provided that the outdoor eating area shall comply with the parking requirements in this UDO.” If no grade separation is provided between vehicular traffic and the outdoor dining area, such as in this case, permanent railings or fencing shall be provided around the dining area. The Applicant intends to install an 8-foot fence, which would actually be considered a wall under code. Although City staff is supportive of gathering spaces and particularly within the TOD District, concerns were identified as they relate to potential negative impacts and additional constraints to 5939 John Martin Drive, which is owned by the City EDA, and the locations of proposed egress, which would ultimately open out directly into the parking lot and shared drive aisle. While the patio has since been revised from 1,200-square feet to 704-square feet, the gates (egress) still open out into the adjacent drive aisle and parking areas, with no real buffer or area of refuge. b. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. Applicant Response: Absolutely. We are already active in the community, and we have a channel to help us reach out to the under-privileged. City Staff Response (Finding): City staff spoke to the Applicant and requested additional information concerning the proposed operation of the use as the narrative and provided conditional use permit criteria responses are brief in nature. Although the Applicant provided additional information on September 13, 2023, City staff still notes a significant parking deficiency. With no opportunities to expand parking, and given that this would not truly be in alignment with the purpose and function of the TOD district, City staff requested the Applicant look at ways to reduce their parking needs and overall intensity of use. While the Applicant reduced the size of their outdoor patio (74 parking space deficiency to 58 parking space deficiency), no other areas of the building were adjusted to reduce the overall intensity of use. As City staff requested the Applicant file for a variance in addition to the site and building plan and conditional use permit requests, the Applicant will need to also address the practical difficulties criteria, which is a three-factor test (all of which must be satisfied). This test is as laid out under Minnesota State Statutes 462.357, subdivision 6 and notes that, “variances may be granted when the applicant for a variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance.” The requested conditional use permit would ultimately be conditioned upon the Applicant obtaining approval of a variance. c. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. Applicant Response: Wholly agree. As we know, maintaining good relationships with your neighbors is very important and can be made or broken simply by whether or not you keep your lot clean. For instance, we have made it a point since 2017 to regularly clean our parking lot, and App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 23 we extend the trash pickup to the surrounding businesses, including two hotels and the FBI building, and the curbs along Freeway Blvd. City Staff Response (Finding): As noted above, the Applicant would need to provide additional information as part of the variance request to assuage any concerns that the proposed use might be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted. While the hours of operation may not impact current businesses, there are potential issues of liability if the proposed use expands onto other neighboring properties. These include potential issues of parking off-site by patrons, trash, and general noise considerations. The closest active uses to the Subject Property are the HealthPartners Dental Clinic, which is just over 50 feet away, and the Brooklyn Center School District office, Early College Academy, and Centaur Beginnings Child Care, which is located less than 500 feet away, and Jani-King, which is located a little over 200 feet away. Restaurant Depot is located a little over 300 feet away; however, is positioned across John Martin Drive. d. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. Applicant Response: That is correct. We don’t even have a clue how to go about impeding orderly development. City Staff Response (Finding): The Subject Property is surrounded on three sides by properties owned by the City’s Economic Development Authority (EDA), which are intended for the future creation of new, walkable blocks and development within the Opportunity Site. As is contemplated in the Council-adopted Infrastructure Framework (2021), John Martin Drive, on which the Subject Property abuts, is identified as a future “Main Street” and the Framework identifies a future potential Garden Street that would run perpendicular to John Martin Drive and generally between the Subject Property and EDA-owned 5939 John Martin Drive. These properties are currently served by a single, shared driveway. As proposed, the Applicant would build a revised 704-square foot outdoor patio with an 8-foot fence (wall). Although City staff appreciates the adjustment in patio size, there are still likely consequences in that traffic would ultimately be pushed onto the EDA property—this assumes redevelopment of the EDA property (5939 John Martin Drive) and the provision of minimum 20- foot lanes to provide minimum fire access. e. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress, egress, and parking so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. Applicant Response: Certainly. Our personnel have measures in place (tracking the number of vehicles into the lot, traffic redirection) to allow for safe entrance and exiting. City Staff Response (Finding): As noted above, the Subject Property and neighboring EDA-owned 5939 John Martin Drive share a common driveway off John Martin Drive. No secondary access points are available for either property at this time. Based on the narrative provided by the Applicant, the peak traffic demand for the Subject Property use would likely be generated in the evening or nighttime hours and on weekends. Considering the EDA-owned property is vacant, City staff is unable to determine potential traffic congestion issues in the public streets at this time. App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 24 As the parking at 5939 John Martin Drive was left in place, City staff has some concerns there may be spillover onto the EDA property for parking purposes and as it is relatively convenient to the main entrance and proposed outdoor patio. Although the impacts may be negligible in the interim, the future vision of this and the other surrounding EDA properties are to redevelop to the highest and best use possible and in alignment with the currently underway Opportunity Site Master Plan. As the proposed use is a restaurant/bar and nightclub, it is assumed there may be an exodus of customers at bar close, which is noted as 2 a.m. Thursdays through Sundays. The neighboring, existing users along John Martin Drive (i.e. HealthPartners Dental Clinic, Jani-King) are fairly low traffic uses and will likely not be impacted given their opposing hours of operation. The highest intensity use during the daytime is likely Restaurant Depot (5925 Earle Brown Drive), which is located to the north of the Subject Property. f. Impacts such as noise, hours of activity, and exterior lighting have been sufficiently addressed to mitigate negative impacts on nearby uses. Applicant Response: Absolutely. Our business hours of operations will have no more of a negative impact on the area than any other business. Our after-hours processes and procedures are in place to expedite a safe and complete exit once business closes. City Staff Response (Finding): To City staff’s knowledge, the surrounding brick and mortar businesses operate during the daytime hours; whereas, the peak demand for the proposed new Jambo Africa will likely be into the evening and nighttime hours. The Applicant notes in their narrative that they also offer “full-service dine-in, takeout, and delivery via several online entities such as Uber Eats, Chow-Now, and Doordash,” and “provide off-site catering.” City staff concerns regarding potentially negative impacts to nearby uses primarily relate to an outlined deficiency in on-site parking, based on the original plans provided. City staff reviewed the provided occupant loads and “actual” occupant loads given by the Applicant’s architect and compared them to occupancy load numbers calculated by the City Building Official. City staff also reviewed the provided narrative to further determine potential maximum activity on the property. It was from these numbers City staff was able to break down the eating establishment (restaurant) areas and assembly (nightclub) areas for parking calculation purposes. Based on this, it appears the Subject Property is at least 58 parking spaces short. Other potential future concerns may be as they relate to noise during the evening hours given the proposed late-night hours, outdoor patio with garage doors (e.g. potential noise from the stage and DJ if open), and any mingling in the parking lots upon bar close. g. The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. Applicant Response: Yes, certainly, Jambo Africa is committed to the conformation of all regulations. City Staff Response (Finding): While the use (restaurant and bar with nightclub) are permitted through issuance of a conditional use permit, the Applicant does not conform to the applicable App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 25 regulations of the district in which the Subject Property is located with respect to parking. As is outlined in the site and building plan review portion of this report, there appear to be no alternatives to satisfy this parking deficiency at this time. Although the future buildout of the Opportunity Site may present opportunities for on-street parking, which was approved for as part of the Phase I development, this is likely years from coming to fruition. VARIANCE Variances may only be granted when the Applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.357, subdivision 6, the City Council may only grant approval of a variance where “practical difficulties” exist as to the strict compliance with the City’s Unified Development Ordinance and each of the following criteria are satisfied (Note: Applicant responses transcribed from submitted narrative—Exhibit A): 1. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the City’s Unified Development Ordinance. Applicant Response: We believe that the variance meets the intent of the Unified Development Ordinance. The existing drive lane along the west of the building is adjacent to an abandoned parking lot and separated by a narrow green space. City Staff Response (Finding): The variance request is centered around the necessity of a parking variance, of which City staff determined to be approximately 58 parking spaces short of the minimum requirements outlined for eating and drinking places and assembly uses. This is of further concern as the Transit-Oriented District (TOD) in which the Subject Property is located, is intended to support, “vibrant pedestrian activity and discourages land uses and development patterns that could decrease walkability or interfere with future growth of transit-oriented development and transit ridership.” While City staff recognizes the Subject Property is non-conforming with respect to the building’s location (setbacks) and parking, there are potential negative factors to be considered given the intended use comes in advance of any build out of this portion of the Opportunity Site, which would likely require structured and on-street parking to meet the purpose of both the TOD District and Opportunity Site. The “abandoned parking lot” and half of the drive lane the Applicant references above is owned by the City’s Economic Development Authority and is intended for future redevelopment; therefore, it cannot be assumed it will remain in this condition. 2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Applicant Response: Our request for a variance is so we can use an existing concrete slab for seasonal outdoor dining which is beneficial for patrons during the short summer months. City Staff Response (Finding): The request for an outdoor patio is not the sole contributor to the necessity of a parking variance—although it contributes, the indoor usage and intensities are the greatest factor as to why the parking variance is needed. The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan designates this area with a future land use designation of “Transit-Oriented Development (TOD)” and the City’s Future Land Use Plan is intended to demonstrate how the City intends to create a, “dynamic, sustainable, and integrated community App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 26 long-term.” It further contemplates how the City might grow and change and breakdown future land uses in such a way as to create a, “balanced, and well-integrated land use pattern.” This includes the incorporation of a “central spine” that encourages a diverse, and integrated mix of uses that promotes transit and walkability. The TOD future land use designation is a new land use designation under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan that is planned for a mix of residential, commercial, office, and retail uses. Land is generally within a ½ mile of the Brooklyn Center Transit Station and is intended to provide these areas with frequent, and efficient bus/transit services and connections to the broader region. A minimum of 75-percent (%) of the land within this designation is planned for higher-density residential development, with the remainder developed for supporting retail, office, and commercial uses. This area would ultimately create a walkable, bikeable, and vibrant core in the City. The City acknowledges that redevelopment will not happen overnight and notes there should be thoughtful approaches as to how new development can incorporate and integrate existing uses into redevelopment efforts to achieve incremental improvements; however, it would also be irresponsible to approve a use that does not appear to have the current infrastructure to support it. 3. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Unified Development Ordinance. Applicant Response: We believe it is reasonable for the success of our business and an amenity for our patrons to provide an outdoor space for seasonal dining. City Staff Response (Finding): A request to offer outdoor dining space within the City of Brooklyn Center by itself in a City that has limited sit-down dining opportunities is commendable and appears to be desired by the community; however, the Subject Property was never designed to accommodate an approximately 10,200-square foot restaurant and bar (nightclub) and while the parking standards as outlined under Section 35-5500 (Parking and Driveways) offer opportunities to reduce minimum parking requirements via a parking study, or through use of shared parking, a parking study was not conducted and there do not appear to be opportunities at this point in time to accommodate a shared parking scenario. While the Applicant notes in their business summary (Exhibit A) that they enforce a “car pool policy” and even incentivize employees who bring other employees to work, the City does not currently have a policy in place for this or a means to calculate as part of the overall parking demands and would have concerns with setting precedent without this language in place. It appears that Saturdays require the greatest amount of staff given the “high volume of customers.” On these days, they note the following anticipated staffing levels: App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 27 Assuming this, there would potentially be upwards of 20 staff on hand. During the work week, they note a base staff of 5. In general, they employee 15 staff (4 full time, 11 part time with 4 of the 11 part time staff not working during night time activities). The Subject Property was originally designed for sole use as a retail sporting goods store and over time evolved into a two-tenant building. Although there is currently a restaurant (buffet) user, this use occupies only a portion of the space and was offset, up until this past year, by an auto shop that had significantly less of a parking demand than the restaurant use. As is discussed earlier in this report, City staff explored alternate opportunities for off-site parking and per the Applicant’s inquiry to park either on the neighboring EDA property (5939 John Martin Drive) or across the street at Shingle Creek Center; however, those were determined to not be options at this time. Although City staff discussed the future vision of the Opportunity Site and specifically John Martin Drive, which is conceived in the draft Master Plan and City Council adopted Infrastructure Framework (2021) as a “Main Street” with on-street parking, the final plan has yet to be adopted and the Phase I development of the Opportunity Site has yet to go under construction. 4. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Applicant Response: This is an existing property in which the land is maximized in regards to the existing building and paved parking areas. There is no space available to increase the existing number of parking spaces. City Staff Response (Finding): The existing property (Subject Property) was maximized in terms of the existing building and paved parking areas, and under the assumption of a retail store use as opposed to a restaurant and bar (nightclub). In reviewing the parking requirements for the original, approximately 8,820-square foot retail store with 1,425-square feet of storage, the staff report notes the “minimum required 85 parking stalls” was provided for. Over time, five (5) parking spaces approved as part of the 1979 City Council approvals were lost to accommodate an additional trash enclosure for restaurant use; however, the restaurant use did not occupy the whole building and the approximately 3,700-square foot Tires Plus required less parking as a use. Although City staff was unable to identify the minimum parking for Tires Plus within the documentation on file, the minimum parking would likely have been calculated assuming the App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 28 following: Three (3) spaces for each enclosed bay plus one space for each day shift employee plus a minimum of two spaces for service vehicles and one additional space for each service vehicle over two in number. Assuming this, the former Tires Plus would’ve likely required a minimum of 26 on-site parking spaces—whether located in each of the 6 original bays or in the surface parking lot and assuming 6 employees as noted per paperwork found on file. This would’ve left 54 on-site parking spaces for the current restaurant use and assumes the loss of the five (5) parking spaces to the restaurant trash enclosure. At one point in time, it appears the current New King Buffet space was utilized for the short-term storage of merchandise by Kohl’s per a Certificate of Occupancy dated 1994. It also appears there may have been a restaurant/buffet use in the late 1990s, post warehouse use (1994) and prior to New King Buffet occupying the space (2008). 5. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Applicant Response: We believe that our proposed vision is an excellent use of an existing building that may sit vacant for years to coming and be a benefit to the community and future uses of the adjacent property once developed. City Staff Response (Finding): The area the Subject Property is located within is positioned for great transformation over the coming years as part of the City’s Opportunity Site. This area has been contemplated for redevelopment since the 2000s and the Economic Development Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center has, to-date, acquired approximately 49 acres of the approximately 80-acre Opportunity Site, and as part of its commitment to the vision for a downtown Brooklyn Center. This vision is further laid out and reinforced within the draft Opportunity Site Master Plan (slated for adoption later this year), adopted Opportunity Site Infrastructure Framework (2021), 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and recently adopted Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). As proposed, the building, which is non-conforming with respect to the City’s TOD setback requirements and placement of parking, would remain. While the 2040 Comprehensive Plan outlines opportunities for working with existing uses, City staff is concerned with the long-term impacts and constraints the use might cause. Although the Applicant outlines opportunities to minimize parking needs through their “car pool policy” and notes that dancing would be limited to the 300-square foot dance floor because they use digital panels, City staff is unable to justify these as part of its review as there are no considerations outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance. It should be further noted that economic considerations alone shall not constitute a “practical difficulty.” In considering a variance application, “quasi-judicial” authority is exercised in that the City evaluates the facts presented against a legal standard (i.e. a City’s adopted minimum parking requirements given a use). Prior to requesting consideration of a variance, an Applicant should always review all possible alternatives that would meet code requirements before applying for a variance. App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 29 ANTICIPATED PERMITTING AND CONDITIONS Following a review of the submittal materials and the requests, approval of all three (3) application requests (i.e. site and building plan, conditional use permit, and variance) are required in order to forward this request. It should be reiterated that in order to approve the conditional use permit and variance requests, satisfaction of all criteria is required. City staff recommends the following conditions be attached to any positive recommendation on the approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2023-006 for the Subject Property located at 5927 John Martin Drive and approval of a restaurant and bar (nightclub) with approximately 704-square foot outdoor patio: 1. Any major changes or modifications made to this Site and Building Plan, and as outlined within the City Code, can only be made by an amendment to the approved Site and Building Plan as approved by the City Council. 2. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits, and with respect to the cursory review comments provided in the Building Official’s memorandum dated October 2, 2023. 3. The Applicant shall work to ensure all applicable Minnesota Fire Code requirements have been met as part of any site plan approval and with respect to the proposed modifications to the building. i. A fire sprinkler system is required to be installed and shall be maintained on a consistent basis per City Code requirements. 4. A SAC Determination shall be submitted by the Applicant to the Metropolitan Council and any associated fees paid at time of any permit issuance for the building and outdoor patio uses. 5. Application to and approval from the Hennepin County Health Department for the intended restaurant and bar use. 6. The Applicant shall provide any final site and building plans to City staff for a CPTED review and make alterations as necessary prior to permit release. 7. A revised landscape plan and detailing shall be submitted to ensure compliance with the originally approved landscape plan (1979) and last revised landscape plan (1991), which contemplate a minimum required 108 landscape points for the Subject Property. i. Revise landscape schedule to provide inventory of existing landscape plantings. ii. Replace proposed Japanese Barberry with alternate shrubs, to be approved by the City Planner. 8. The Applicant shall ensure an irrigation system is in place or install a new system where necessary to facilitate maintenance of site landscaping and green areas, and irrigation shop drawings for review and approval prior to installation. 9. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view per City Code requirements and a detail sheet provided. i. The existing trash enclosure located at the southwest corner of the Subject Property shall be removed and the area restored. 10. The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the Assistant City Engineer’s review memorandum, originally dated September 5, 2023, and revised October 5, 2023. 11. The Applicant shall work with the property owner located at 5939 John Martin Drive (Economic Development Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center) to determine necessity of an amendment or creation of a new covenant and easement for storm sewer, driveway purposes and pedestrian use, and development agreement and covenants for the App. No. 2023-006 PC 09/14/2023 | PC 10/12/2023 (Revised) Page 30 construction and maintenance of the aforementioned storm sewer and driveway, and with respect to the proposed permanent outdoor patio. 12.Coordinate with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for abandonment and/or removal of the sand and oil interceptor, any trench drains, and any remediation efforts that might be required assuming the former auto shop use. 13.Application and issuance of a City liquor license. 14.Application and approval of a City live entertainment license. 15.The Applicant shall submit a Sign Permit Application for any proposed signage (e.g., wall, freestanding) and receive issuance of a permit prior to any installation. All signage shall conform to City requirements. ALTERNATIVES 1.Vote to recommend City Council approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2023-006 for approval of a site and building plan, conditional use permit, and variance for the Subject Property located at 5927 John Martine Drive with the above-outlined conditions of approval. By voting to approve this application, the site and building plan and conditional use permit for the restaurant and bar (nightclub) and approximately 704-square foot outdoor patio with a parking deficiency (variance) of 58 parking spaces would be approved, subject to the above-noted conditions of approval. 2.Vote to recommend City Council denial of Planning Commission Application No. 2023-006 for approval of a site and building plan, conditional use permit, and variance for the Subject Property located at 5927 John Martine Drive. By voting to deny this application, the requests for site and building plan and a conditional use permit for a restaurant and bar (nightclub) and approximately 704- square foot outdoor patio with a parking deficiency (variance) of 58 parking spaces would be denied. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A – Planning Commission Application No. 2023-006 Plans and Documents, submitted August 23, 2023, and last revised September 13, 2023. Exhibit B – Public Hearing Notices, submitted for publication in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post, and dated August 31, 2023 and September 28, 2023. Exhibit C – Letter to Applicant, prepared by City Planner Ginny McIntosh, and dated September 9, 2023. Exhibit D – Review Memorandum, prepared by Assistant City Engineer James Soltis, and last revised October 5, 2023. Exhibit E – Review Memorandum, prepared by Building Official Dan Grinsteinner, and last revised October 2, 2023. Exhibit B Jambo Africa Restaurant and Bar 5927 John Martin Drive, Brooklyn Center, MN Narrative Description of Work We are submitting documents for city approval including a conditional use permit. We feel that what we are proposing is an excellent use for this property and will benefit the community. The proposed project consists of remodeling the entire interior space of the building for a nightclub with restaurant and bar. The existing use was a restaurant (east half) and auto repairs (west half). No work is planned for the exterior of the building with the exception of removing the existing overhead doors on the west facade and replacing with glass. Over the years some of the approved landscaping from 1991 is gone. We propose to add back any plants and trees to bring the landscaping back to what it was. The existing concrete pad along the west overhead doors will be used for seasonal patio seating. Usage of the Property Jambo Africa is a restaurant & Bar (nightclub), based in Brooklyn Center, Mn. We specialize inoriginal and authentic cuisine from the African continent, such as cassava, torborgee, plantain, and pepper soup, prepared and sauteed with special spices and sauces. We are one of the first African-owned restaurants in the Minneapolis/St Paul metro area to cater to members of the large and growing African communities in the Twin Cities. We offer full-service dine- in, takeout, and delivery via several online entities such as Uber Eats, Chow-Now, and Doordash. We provide offsite catering, and we have been recognized as one of the Preferred Vendors for several cities (Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Coon Rapids, etc) in the northern metro since 2017. We will be transferring all restaurant operations from the current location,1601 Freeway Blvd, to the new location, 5729 John Martin Drive. Hours of Operations Monday – Wednesday 11:00 am to 12:00 am Thursday – Sunday 11:00 am to 02:00 am We have established processes and procedures for safety, for our customers, and our team members, and a security team is in place and onsite for all nightly activities Thursday through Sunday. The following are the criteria for the conditional use permit: Section 35-7703 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CRITERIA. A conditional use permit may not be granted by the City Council unless the following criteria have been satisfied: a. The conditional use will be in accordance with the general objectives, or with any specific object of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and this UDO Applicant Response: Certainly. We would not operate without being in full accordance with City Plans. b. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, or comfort Applicant Response: Absolutely. We are already active in the community, and we have a channel to help us reach out to the under-privileged c. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within this neighborhood Applicant Response: Wholly agree. As we know, maintaining good relationships with your neighbors is very important, and can be made or broken simply by whether or not you keep your lot clean. For instance, we have made it a point since 2017 to regularly clean our parking lot, and we extend the trash pickup to the surrounding businesses, including two hotels and the FBI building, and the curbs alongside Freeway Blvd. d. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district Applicant Response: That is correct. We dont even have a clue how to go about impeding orderly development e. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress, egress, and parking so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets Applicant Response: Certainly. Our personnel have measures in place (tracking the number of vehicles into the lot, traffic redirection) to allow for safe entrance and exiting f. Impacts such as noise, hours of activity, and exterior lighting have been sufficiently addressed to mitigate negative impacts on nearby uses Applicant Response: Absolutely. Our business hours of operations will have no more of a negative impact on the area than any other business. Our after-hours processes and procedures are in place to expedite a safe and complete exit once business closes g. The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located Applicant Response: Yes, certainly, Jambo Africa is committed to the conformation of all regulations Thank you for your consideration. Jambo Africa 5927 John Martin Drive Brooklyn Center, MN Variance Criteria a) The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this UDO. We believe that the variance meets the intent of the Unified Development Ordinance. The existing drive lane along the west of the building is adjacent to an abandoned parking lot and separated by a narrow green space. b) The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Our request for a variance is so we can use an existing concrete slab for seasonal outdoor dining which is beneficial for patrons during the short summer month's. c) The property owner proposed to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this UDO. We believe it is reasonable for the success of our business and an amenity for our patrons to provide an outdoor space for seasonal dining. d) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and not created by the landowner. This is an existing property in which the land is maximized in regards to the existing building and paved parking area. There is no space available to increase the existing number of parking spaces. e) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. We believe that our proposed vision is an excellent use of an existing building that may sit vacant for years to come and be a benefit to the community and future uses of the adjacent property once developed. Additional Review Information 1) The proposed approximately 1,200-square foot outdoor patio will extend into the existing drive aisle that is shared with neighboring 5939 John Martin Drive. In consideration of the proposed patio, City staff has concerns regarding minimum fire access through this area and around the building, overall circulation on the Subject Property, safe exiting from the patio area given the locations of the proposed gates, and any mitigative measures considered to minimize negative impacts to the adjacent property, as outlined under Section 35-7703 (Conditional Use Permit Criteria). We are proposing that the existing drive aisle along the west side be a one way drive (south to north) for the primary use of trash removal vehicles. Please note that the property to the west is an abandened parking lot. 2) Revision of the submitted photometric plan to meet City Code requirements outlined under Section 35-5400 (Exterior Lighting), which shall clearly demonstrate consistent levels of illumination across the existing open-air parking lot and avoid pockets of very high or low levels of illumination. Spot illuminations shall be provided to clearly demonstrate adherence to minimum and maximum illumination levels, as well as uniformity, and a fixture schedule provided. As previously indicated, the existing pole and wall lighting is non-conforming. Detail sheets shall be provided clearly demonstrating enhanced illumination over all primary building entrances/exits and any pedestrian path ways as outlined under Section 35-5401.m.2 (Lighting Standards) of the City Code. Updated photometric plan and fixture types attached. 3) The submitted landscape plan shall be revised to provide an inventory of all existing plantings and species/types. The last revised landscape plan on file and dated November 14, 1991 indicated a minimum required 108 landscape points, which shall be satisfied by the Applicant. We have indicated 105 plants (new and replacement). Please note that an existing trash enclosure is located near the SE corner of the existing building which was not present on the 1991 plan. If required, we can locate the 3 missing plants elsewhere. 4) Revise proposed architectural plans to clearly identify proposed areas of change and a percentage breakdown of materials on an elevation-by-elevation basis. Provide additional west elevation rendering denoting the anticipated changes to the existing garage bay doors, as the proposed outdoor patio wall (fencing) makes it difficult to review. The west facade is the only exterior wall with modifications. 2 of the existing overhead doors will be replaced with full glass overhead doors. The remaining openings will have transom glass and the remainder of these opening infilled with scored concrete masonry units to match the existing. Updated west elevation attached. Jambo Africa 5927 John Martin Drive Brooklyn Center Business Operation Summary During regular business hours in the week, we employ a base crew consisting of 2 cooks, 1 Dish washer, 1 server and 1 manager. Since covid, 80% of our orders come through third-party apps including Door-Dash, Uber Eats, and Rushable. Approximately 20% of our clientele are walk-in/dine-in. We operate more as a takeout dining shop, which allows us to accommodate the dine-in customers with minimal staff. Our demographic tends to be the 21-35 plus range, there are some on Fridays and Sundays we see less activities, which is why the staff is so small on those days. Our overall staff includes 15 employees, 4 are full time and 11 are part time (4 of 11 don’t work during night activities) Additional notes: We enforce a strict dress code on the weekends, in hopes of deterring hoodlum customers. Our dance floor is made up of digital floor panels Our night staff follows our car-pool policy, ensuring we all leave together. **staff call pool policy Most of our staff live near each other and some don’t even drive, so with that in mind we started a car pool plan so that everyone has a ride to work at night cause uber and lift are expensive. I give 10 dollars per person brought to work by another employee on their check. Fri & Sun Bartenders = 1-2 Bar back = 1 Servers = 3.5 Kitchen = 1.5 Security = 3-4 Manager = 1 DJ = 1 Manager = 1 Saturday (we have the most staff on the premises due to the high volume of customers) Bartenders = 3 Bar back = 1 Servers = 4 Kitchen = 2 Security = 6 Manager = 1 DJ = 2 Manager = 1  Security Fri & Sun = 4 Saturday = 6-7 Jambo Africa 5927 John Martin Drive Brooklyn Center, MN Zoning plan review Items: A1-100 – Site Plan 1. Indicate the disturbed area due to patio and other site disturbances. Square footage over 10,000 sf will trigger a city land disturbance permit and additional site review requirements. The patio is located on an existing concrete slab along the west side of the building. We are putting a fence around it. 2. Site plan indicates a change in locations of accessible parking spaces from the previous use. Provide documentation the proposed locations meet MN Accessibility Code requirements. We are indicating 2 accessible stalls along the east of the building per the 1991 landscape plan we received. 2 additional stalls were indicated in the center north parking area that were designated for the previous business occupying the west suite. I am unable to find in the UDO the ratio of required accessible stalls. We will add the required number but ask for the # of stalls required. 3. The number of provided accessible parking spaces does not meet MN Accessibility Code for minimum number of accessible spaces. Indicate additional locations to meet this minimum number including documentation these locations meet applicable code requirements. I am unable to find in the UDO the ratio of required accessible stalls. We will add the required number but ask for the # of stalls required. 4. Proposed patio extends into the drive aisle along the North West side of building. Verify reduced drive width meets city minimum requirements for a two way drive as indicated in Section 35- 5504. PARKING SPACE STANDARDS. The patio is an existing concrete slab. The city property to the west is an abandoned parking lot. We are taking the patio area of the existing concrete slab back to the edge of the drive aisle. 5. Provide details of any alteration to the drainage patterns along the North Western drive regarding any patio work. We are not altering any existing grades. 6. Provide a description of the work related to the patio including any removal of pavement or adjustment to grades. Provide documentation the proposed patio meets MN Accessibility Code requirements. There is no removal of any pavements or disturbance of grades. 7. Provide a description of any safety considerations for the patio in regard to the adjacent drive. Pipe bollards will be placed at the SW and NW corner of the existing patio area. General Items: 8. From Section 35-320: Required Documents, the following are required as part of this submittal. A survey drawing by a registered engineer or land surveyor showing pertinent existing conditions, accurately dimensioned. We are not altering any existing paving or the building. We have been told due to this that a survey is not requied at this time. CONCRETE, STUCCO BLUESTONE /SLATE ETC. STEEL OSB, PARTICLE BD PLYWOOD- SMALL SCALE BATT/LOOSE FILL INSUL. SAND/MORTAR/ PLASTER/CUT STONE TERRAZZO FOAM INSULATION PLASTIC RIGID INSULATION GYPSUM WALL BOARD LARGE SCALE STEEL STUD-LARGE SCALE WOOD STUD LARGE SCALE POROUS FILL GRAVEL LARGE SCALE CONCRETE BLOCK BRASS ROUGH FRAMING GLASS BLOCK PLYWOOD, LVL GLASS FACE BRICK ALUMINUM BLOCKING FINISH WOOD EARTH/COMPAC T FILL CERAMIC TILE WOOD STUD- SMALL SCALE ACOUSTIC TILE BEARING STUD-SMALL 001 # L01 333A Room name 101 A1 INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DOOR TAG BUILDING AND WALL SECTIONS WINDOW TAG EQUIPMENT TAG GRIDS PLUMBING TAG ELEVATION HEIGHT ELECTRICAL AND LIGHTING FIXTURE TAG CENTER LINE WALL TAG KEY NOTES 1 REVISION TAG1 A101 SIM A-20 1 A 1 Name Elevation 001A 001 ROOM TAG Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 9/ 1 3 / 2 0 2 3 9 : 4 2 : 4 3 A M C: \ U s e r s \ p i x o x \ O n e D r i v e - R a y s D e s i g n s \ S h a r e d P U B L I C \ P r o j e c t s \ P r o j e c t _ 2 0 2 3 \ 2 3 7 1 0 - R S D - 5 9 2 7 J o h n M a r t i n D r , B r o o k l y n c e n t e r , M N 5 5 4 3 0 _ S i m o n e \ 0 5 - R e v i t \ 5 9 2 7 J o h n M a r t i n D r - C D - R e v i s i o n 3 _ 0 9 - 1 2 - 2 0 2 3 . r v t A0-001 TITLE 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 09-13-2023 ST PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PROJECT LOCATION: SITE LOCATION: PROJECT SCOPE: SITE: DRAWING INDEX: Sheet # Sheet Name A0-001 TITLE A0-101 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN A0-201 EXISTING ELEVATIONS A0-202 EXISTING ELEVATIONS A1-100 SITE PLAN A1-101 MAIN FLOOR PLAN A1-102 MAIN FLOOR PLAN - FF&E A1-201 MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN A1-203 RESTROOM ENLARGED PLAN & ELEVATION A1-204 RESTROOM ENLARGED PLAN & ELEVATION A1-300 AREA PLAN A1-301 FINISH PLAN A1-302 RCP A1-303 EMERGENCY EXIT PLAN A2-101 EXTERIOR ELEVATION A2-102 EXTERIOR ELEVATION A6-101 DOOR/WINDOW SCHEDULES & DETAILS A6-102 DETAILS A8-101 SPECIFICATIONS A8-102 ADAAG A9-101 3D VIEWS A9-102 3D VIEWS E1-100 EQUIPMENT PLAN MATERIAL SYMBOL TAG SYMBOL INTERIOR REMODEL 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT N BAR CODE SUMMARY SCOPE OF WORK:BUILDING REMODELING FOR A 1 STORY RESTAURANT & BAR (NIGHTCLUB) WITH MEZZANINE APPLICABLE CODES: 2020 MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE 2020 MINNESOTA ACCESSIBILITY CODE 2020 MINNESOTA BUILDING CONSERVATION CODE 2020 MINNESOTA STATE MECHANICAL AND FUEL GAS CODE 2020 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CODE 2020 MINNESOTA STATE PLUMBING CODE 2020 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE OCCUPANCY TYPE: A-2 (MBC SECTION 303.2) CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-B ~ S1 (MBC TABLES 506.2) EXISTING MASONRY BUILDING WITH STEEL BAR JOIST ROOF STRUCTURE OCCUPANT LOAD: MAIN LEVEL SEATED DINING: 2621 SF / 15 = 175 OCC (MBC 1004.5) (ACTUAL MAIN LEVEL SEATING PER PLAN) = 93 OCC PATIO (SEASONAL): 704 SF / 15 = 46 OCC (ACTUAL PATIO SEATING PER PLAN) = 28 OCC DANCE FLOOR:330 SF / 15 =66 OCC (NOTE: OCCUPANTS ON DANCE FLOOR ARE AMONG THOSE SEATED) DJ:37SF 1 OCC STAGE:160 SF / 15 = 11 OCC KITCHEN: 811 SF / 200 = 4 OCC BAR (SERVICE ONLY): 213 SF / 50 = 4 OCC OFFICE: 380 SF / 150 = 3 OCC STORAGE (MEZZANINE): 1204 SF / 500 =3 OCC TOTAL: 213 OCC SIGNAGE: PROVIDE TACTILE SIGNAGE AT ALL RESTROOMS PER MBC 703.1 EXIT LIGHTING:LED TYPE EXIT/EMERGENCY LIGHTS MUST BE LOCATED AT EACH EXIT PER IBC SECTION 1008 -ILLUMINATE BOTH INTERIOR & EXTERIOR. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER: EXISTING SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLED THROUGHOUT PLUMBING FIXTURES: FIXTURES REQUIRED: 3 WC / 3 LAV PER SEX (IBC TABLE 2902.1/ 2902.2) FIXTURES PROVIDED: 2 WC / 2U / 2 LAV (MEN) + 4 WC / 2 LAV (WOMEN) + 1 WC / 1 LAV @ 3 UNISEX + 1 WC / 2 LAV (STAFF) + SERVICE SINK GROSS FLOOR AREA: 10,106 SQ. FT. (MAIN LEVEL) 1458 SQ. FT. (MEZZANINE) BUILDING HEIGHT: EXISTING 1 STORY W/ MEZZANINE GENERAL NOTES 1.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING ALL DIMENSIONS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS. 2.SIMILAR MATERIALS INDICATED ON DIFFERENT PLANS, SECTIONS AND DETAILS, AND ANNOTATED ON ONE OR MORE PLAN, SECTION OR DETAIL SHALL BE CONSIDERED ANNOTATED, NOTED OR LABELED COMPLETELY ON ALL PLANS, SECTIONS AND DETAILS. 3.IN THE CASE OF AMBIGUITIES, DISCREPANCIES OR IRREGULARITIES IN THE DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, MANUFACTURING INSTRUCTIONS, SITE CONDITIONS OR APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS, REQUEST CLARIFICATION FROM THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING. THE COST OF CORRECTING WORK DONE AS A RESULT OF PROCEEDING WITHOUT OBTAINING CLARIFICATION WILL BE BORNE SOLELY BY THE CONTRACTOR. 4.THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR OWNER MUST VERIFY AND CHECK ALL NOTES, FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS, SECTIONS AND DETAILS AND NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY ERRORS OR OMMISSIONS FOR POSSIBLE CORRECTION PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 5.ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL & PLUMBING REMODEL PLANS (IF REQUIRED) SHALL BE SUPPLIED BY THE CONTRACTORS PERFORMING THE WORK. 6.SPRINKLER SYSTEM MODIFICATION LAYOUT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR PERFORMING THE WORK. 7.ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE BUILDING CODES & ORDINANCES. 8.SEE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. No. Description Date A B C D E 32 ' - 0 " 32 ' - 0 " 32 ' - 0 " 25 ' - 4 " 1 2 3 4 4' - 6 5/8" 3' - 5"7' - 5" 7' - 0 " 5' - 6 " 4' - 9" 8' - 10" 22' - 2 5/8" 13' - 11 1/4"7' - 9 3/8" 28' - 11 1/2" 5' - 3 3 / 8 " 7' - 4" 16' - 5 1/2" 28 ' - 9 1 / 2 " 35' - 0 3/8" 31 ' - 4 " 3' - 3" 1' - 1 1 " 1' - 6 " 22 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 13' - 1 3/4" 47 ' - 1 3 / 8 " 11 ' - 5 " 5' - 6" 1' - 9 3/8" 3' - 0 3 / 4 " 70 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 8' - 0 " 1' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 3' - 4 3 / 8 " 3' - 4 1/8" 19 ' - 2 " WH 3' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 3' - 6 1/8" 2' - 10 3/8" 7' - 3 1 / 8 " 8' - 8 1 / 8 " 14' - 9 3/4" 13 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 12' - 9 1/4" 4' - 8" 7' - 11 1/2" 5 1/4" 35' - 0 5/8" 6' - 4 " 13 ' - 6 " 5' - 7 5/8" 21' - 10 3/8" 29' - 4"29' - 4" 31 ' - 4 5 / 8 " 8' - 7 3 / 4 " 25 ' - 0 7 / 8 " 8 1 / 2 " 6' - 4 7 / 8 " 7' - 1 3 / 8 " 3' - 4 1/2" 3' - 1 1/2" 7' - 4 7/8" 2' - 8 1 / 4 " 16 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 3' - 6 " 3' - 2 1/2" 5' - 7 1/4" 4' - 11 5/8" 1' - 0" 10 ' - 7 " 12 ' - 1 0 " 2' - 7" COUNTER DINING S DINING ADINING C,D 23 ' - 0 " 13' - 7 1/2"12' - 7 1/8" BU F F E T BU F F E T BU F F E T 4' - 4" 4' - 9" BUFFET STATION + GRILL 41' - 8 3/4" COOLER FREEZER ELEC PANEL 12 ' - 7 1 / 4 " 14 ' - 5 3 / 8 " 4' - 11 1/8" 11 ' - 6 1 / 4 " 1' - 7 3/4" 16 ' - 7 3 / 4 " 2' - 2 1 / 8 " 12' - 9 1/8" 17 ' - 5 7 / 8 " 12' - 8 5/8" 3' - 0 3/4" 2' - 0 7 / 8 " 1' - 11" 17' - 1 3/8" 4' - 3 1/4" 1' - 2 5/8" 1' - 6"1' - 6" 6' - 5 5 / 8 " 6' - 0 1/8" 2' - 7" 6' - 7 7/8" 17 ' - 4 " 3' - 6 " 5 1 / 2 " 28' - 6 3/4" 2' - 7 3 / 8 " 1' - 7 " 81 ' - 6 5 / 8 " 12' - 2 3/4" UP 31 ' - 6 " 3' - 3 1 / 8 " RAMP RAMP 1' - 2 " 1' - 2" 6" X 6" POLE RESTROOM RESTROOM KITCHEN 5 1/4"10' - 7 5/8" 10 ' - 1 " 5 1 / 4 " 1' - 1 0 " 9' - 7 7/8" 3' - 9 3 / 8 " 14' - 11 1/4" 8' - 0 5 / 8 " 2' - 5 1/8"13' - 5 1/2"13' - 6 3/4" 6' - 5 7/8" 4' - 0 5 / 8 " 31 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 4' - 0"1' - 5"6' - 0"1' - 10 1/2"3' - 11"2 1/2"2' - 1"6' - 5"2' - 1" 2' - 2 1 / 4 " 4' - 1 1 " 4' - 9"3' - 11"16' - 2"7' - 3 1/4" 3' - 1 1/2" 3' - 8 1 / 2 " 4' - 6 " 2' - 7 " COOKFRYER MEAT CUTTER HANDSINK 10' - 7 3/4" 2' - 6" 6' - 0 3 / 4 " 2' - 5 " 6' - 5 1/4" 20 ' - 0 7 / 8 " 14' - 9 3/4" 8' - 1 " 3' - 5 1 / 2 " 29' - 2 5/8" 3' - 1 1 7 / 8 " 10' - 3 5/8" 40' - 7 1/2" 10' - 7 3/8" 5' - 0 7/8" 40' - 2 5/8" 43' - 2 7/8" 22' - 3 1/2" 6' - 0 5/8" 15 ' - 6 7 / 8 " 25' - 10 1/4" 90' - 0" 1' - 2" 29' - 4" 1' - 0 " 35' - 0 3/8" 35' - 0 5/8" 5' - 9 " 7 7 / 8 " 4' - 2 1 / 8 " 4' - 1 0 " 8" 3' - 6 " 3344 SF EXISTING RESTAURANT 111 SF FOYER 104 SF MEN'S 96 SF WOMEN'S 1026 SF KITCHEN 215 SF STORE 71 SF MECH. 21 SF TOILET 1137 SF AREA BELOW MEZZANINE 2773 SF EXISTING AUTOPARTS 524 SF FOYER 96 SF VESTIBULE 82 SF ENTRY 12 3 ' - 6 " 4' - 1 0 " A B C D E 1 2 3 4 20' - 11 1/8" 6' - 9 3 / 4 " 7' - 5 7 / 8 " 9' - 9 " UP5' - 11" 10' - 8 3/8" 11' - 2 1/4" 1' - 1 0 3 / 8 " 10' - 1 1/8"18' - 1 7/8" 4' - 3 1 / 4 " 16' - 4 1/4" 4' - 1 1 / 2 " 1' - 5 1/4" 6' - 7 1 / 4 " 20 ' - 9 5 / 8 " 44' - 4"27 ' - 1 0 1 / 8 " 25 ' - 5 1 / 8 " 23 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 5 / 8 " 5' - 7 5/8" 11' - 0 1/2" 11' - 0 1/2" 14 ' - 4 1 / 8 " 29' - 4"29' - 4"29' - 4"1' - 0" 58' - 5 1/2"31' - 7 1/2" 25 ' - 1 " 2' - 0 " 90' - 1" 32 ' - 0 " 32 ' - 0 " 32 ' - 0 " 25 ' - 4 " 12 3 ' - 6 " 5' - 3 3 / 8 " 1094 SF MEZANNINE AREA 106 SF ROOM 1 83 SF ROOM 2 Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/ 1 7 / 2 0 2 3 1 : 3 0 : 1 4 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p i x o x \ O n e D r i v e - R a y s De s i g n s \ S h a r e d P U B L I C \ P r o j e c t s \ P r o j e c t _ 2 0 2 3 \ 2 3 7 1 0 - R S D - 5 9 2 7 J o h n M a r t i n D r , B r o o k l y n c e n t e r , M N 5 5 4 30 _ S i m o n e \ 0 5 - R e v i t \ 5 9 2 7 J o h n M a r t i n D r - C D - R e v i si o n 2 _ 0 8 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 3 . r v t A0-101 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 ST PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1/8" = 1'-0"A0-101 1 EXISTING MAIN FLOOR 1/8" = 1'-0"A0-101 2 EXISTING MEZZANINE FLOOR No. Description Date MAIN FLOOR 0" 2ND FLOOR 16' -3 1/4" MAIN CEILING 10' -0" TOP LVL 20' -0" GARAGE -11 1/2" MEZZANINE FLOOR 8' -4" 10 ' - 0 1 / 2 " MAIN FLOOR 0" 2ND FLOOR 16' -3 1/4" MAIN CEILING 10' -0" TOP LVL 20' -0" GARAGE -11 1/2" MEZZANINE FLOOR 8' -4" Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/ 1 7 / 2 0 2 3 1 : 3 0 : 1 5 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p i x o x \ O n e D r i v e - R a y s De s i g n s \ S h a r e d P U B L I C \ P r o j e c t s \ P r o j e c t _ 2 0 2 3 \ 2 3 7 1 0 - R S D - 5 9 2 7 J o h n M a r t i n D r , B r o o k l y n c e n t e r , M N 5 5 4 30 _ S i m o n e \ 0 5 - R e v i t \ 5 9 2 7 J o h n M a r t i n D r - C D - R e v i si o n 2 _ 0 8 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 3 . r v t A0-201 EXISTING ELEVATIONS 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 ST PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3/16" = 1'-0"A0-201 3 NORTH EXIST 3/16" = 1'-0"A0-201 4 SOUTH EXIST No. Description Date MAIN FLOOR 0" 2ND FLOOR 16' -3 1/4" MAIN CEILING 10' -0" TOP LVL 20' -0" GARAGE -11 1/2" MEZZANINE FLOOR 8' -4" 6" 1' - 6 1 / 4 " 10 ' - 0 1 / 2 " 2" 12" MAIN FLOOR 0" 2ND FLOOR 16' -3 1/4" MAIN CEILING 10' -0" TOP LVL 20' -0" GARAGE -11 1/2" MEZZANINE FLOOR 8' -4" 6" 1' - 6 1 / 4 " 10 ' - 0 1 / 2 " 2" 12" Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/ 1 7 / 2 0 2 3 1 : 3 0 : 1 7 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p i x o x \ O n e D r i v e - R a y s De s i g n s \ S h a r e d P U B L I C \ P r o j e c t s \ P r o j e c t _ 2 0 2 3 \ 2 3 7 1 0 - R S D - 5 9 2 7 J o h n M a r t i n D r , B r o o k l y n c e n t e r , M N 5 5 4 30 _ S i m o n e \ 0 5 - R e v i t \ 5 9 2 7 J o h n M a r t i n D r - C D - R e v i si o n 2 _ 0 8 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 3 . r v t A0-202 EXISTING ELEVATIONS 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 SS PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3/16" = 1'-0"A0-202 1 EAST EXIST 3/16" = 1'-0"A0-202 2 WEST EXIST No. Description Date EXISTING BUILDING PROPERTY LINE JOHN MARTIN DR CANOPY OVERHANG PR O P O S E D P A T I O S E A T I N G 188.48 39 2 . 4 1 23 4 . 2 3 2 4 7 .6 8 DUMPSTER EXISTING ASHPHALT PAVEMENT EX I S T I N G A S H P H A L T P A V E M E N T E X I S T I N G A S H P H A L T P A V E M E N T EXISTING GREEN AREA EX I S T I N G G R E E N A R E A E X I S T I N G G R E E N A R E A SETBACK 10' - 0" SETBACK 10' - 0" S E T B A C K 1 0 ' - 0 " SETBACK 10' - 0" 161 2917 4230 43 65 66 76 7 7 8 0 H L L H L (3) JB (3) JB (3) JB (3) JB (4) JB (6) PJ(9) PJ (5 ) P J (7 ) P J L L L S S S S (4 ) J B (3) PJ (3) JB(5) JB(4) JB(3 ) J B (3 ) J B (3) JB S S E E E E E E E E E E E E EE E E E E E 9' - 6" PIPE BOLLARDS PIPE BOLLARDS LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE LEDGEND QUANTITY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE POINTS REMARKS H 2 HACKBERRY CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS 2 1/2" -3"10/30 L 6 SKYLINE LOCUST GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS 'SKYLINE' 10/110 S 6 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA 6/48 PJ 30 PFITXEN JUNIPER JUNIPER CHINENSIS PFITXERIANA 5/9.5 JB 42 JAPANESE GREEN LEAF BARBERRY BERBERIS THUNBERGI 5/19 2 1/2" -3" 3 1/2" -4" 18" -24" 18" -24" E EXISTING ADD NEW ADD NEW ADD NEW ADD NEW ADD NEW NOTE: VERIFY ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPING. EXISTING PLANTS TO REMAIN. ADD NEW PLANTS PER PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAN. 19 TOTAL PARKING : 80 Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 9/13/2023 9:42:44 AM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 3_ 09-12-2023.rvt A1-100 SITE PLAN 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 09-13-2023 SS PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3/64" = 1'-0"A1-100 1 SITE PLAN - PROPOSED No. Description Date UP UP UP UP A B C D E 1 2 3 4 EXIST. MECH. 12' - 9 1/4"21' - 8 5/8" 96 SF VESTIBULE 82 SF FOYER 149 SF MEN'S 138 SF WOMEN'S 4' - 5 " 6' - 6 1 / 4 " 18 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 2 1 / 8 " 29' - 0 3/8" 213 SF BAR AREA 21' - 10 7/8" RAMP 5' - 10 1/4" 3' - 7" 7' - 3 1 / 8 " 167 SF DRY STORAGE 71 SF MECH. FREEZER COOLER EX I S T I N G E L E C T R I C A L COAT CLO. 104 SF OFFICE SERVICE ENTRY ONLY 12' - 0 3/4" 7' - 5"15' - 2 1/4" 16 ' - 6 " 9' - 6" 160 SF STAGE 11 4 S F BA C K S T A G E 13 5 S F GR E E N R M 3' - 6"4' - 11 1/2" 36 SF STO. 8' - 5 1/2" 3' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 12 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 4' - 11 1/2" 11 ' - 1 1 / 4 " 1026 SF KITCHEN OP E R A B L E G L A S S GA R A G E D O O R 29' - 4"29' - 4"29' - 4" 90' - 1" 22' - 3 1/2"14' - 6 5/8"8' - 5 1/2"8' - 0"7' - 0 1/4"7' - 6 1/2"22' - 2 5/8" 12 3 ' - 6 " 58' - 5 1/2"6' - 0 5/8"25' - 10 1/4" 9' - 6 1 / 8 " 15 ' - 6 7 / 8 " 98 ' - 5 " 5' - 3 3 / 8 " 32 ' - 0 " 32 ' - 0 " 32 ' - 0 " 25 ' - 4 " 12 8 ' - 9 3 / 8 " 41' - 8 3/4" VIP SEATING 13 ' - 6 " EXIT ENTRY EXIT U P 7' - 3 1 / 2 " 6' - 0" DANCE FLOOR 8' - 1 0 1 / 2 " NEW OPENING 7' - 0" 8' - 7 7 / 8 " 5' - 0 " 8' - 0" 132 SF LIQUOR STORAGE 54 SF STO. 12 ' - 1 0 7 / 8 " 12 ' - 0 " 7' - 1 0 3 / 8 " 7' - 5 1 / 8 " 7' - 5" 36 SF RSTRM 3 12' - 2" 37 SF DJ 74 ' - 4 7 / 8 " 22' - 3 1/2"12' - 9 1/8" 17 ' - 5 7 / 8 " 500 SF ENTRY / WAITING AREA EX I T KI T C H E N E N T R Y / E X I T AD D N E W H I G H W I N D O W S AD D N E W H I G H W I N D O W S 30' - 0 1/2" 18 ' - 2 1 / 8 " 9' - 4 1 / 4 " A1-203 1 A1-204 7 A1-204 4 PATCH WALL TO MATCH EXISTING REFER EQUIPMENT DRAWINGS FOR DETAIL REENFORCED CONC. PLATFORM, TYP A A AA A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A C C C C E E E E E E E E E E E E W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 E D11D13D14 D17 D16 D12 E E E E E EE D8D7 D6 D5 D4 D3 E D2 0 D1 9 D1 8 E E E D1 D2 E 1 A6-102 3 A6-102 HT . T O CE I L I N G REFER BAR EQUIPMENT DRAWING FOR BAR DETAILS BAR TOP 70 4 S F PA T I O S E A T I N G 605 SF DINING 237 SF DINING A A PATCH WALL OPENING FINISH TO MATCH D26 D27 41 SF RSTRM 1 45 SF RSTRM 2 FENCE AROUND PATIO 8' HT TREX SECLUSIONS FENCE WITH 4' WIDE GATE D28 D27 3' - 0 " CLO 10' - 0"9' - 4"18' - 0" 327 SF OFFICE / STO. 32 ' - 6 " 35 4 S F HA L L W A Y 7' - 9 7 / 8 " 3' - 6" 3' - 6 " FILL TO BE RAISED FENCE AROUND PATIO 8' HT TREX SECLUSIONS FENCE WITH 4' WIDE GATE NO W O R K METAL RAILING, 48" HT OUTER DUMPSTER AREA DOOR W/ LOCK GATE WITH NOTE "STAFF ACCESS ONLY, NOT AN EXIT" D29 D31 A A METAL RAILING 48" HT A 1779 SF VIP SEATING COATS NOTE: SERVICE BAR ONLY, NO SEATED BAR A B C D E 1 2 3 4 REMOVE DOOR, PATCH WALL REMOVE DOOR, PATCH WALL REPLACE W/ GLASS GARAGE DOOR WALL LEGEND EXISTING WALL DEMOLISH NEW WALL C INTERIORNOT RATED 2X4 MTL STUDS @ 16 O.C. 1/2" GYP. BD. 4 MTL STUDS @ 16" O.C., 1/2" GYP. BD. ONE SIDE. WALL TYPES 1. ALL WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO BOTTOM OF ROOF DECK, EXCEPT AS NOTED. USE SLIP-TRACK AT TOP OF WALLS CONSTRUCTED TO DECK. PROVIDE W.R. (WATER RESISTANT) GYPSUM BACKING BOARD IN TOILET ROOMS, AND JANITORS CLOSET. 2. INSTALL WALL FLUSH WITH EXISTING WALL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE NOT RATED EXISTING WALLS TO REMAINEXISTING MARK DESCRIPTIONRATINGPLAN NOTES NOTES: HEIGHT EXISTING BOTTOM OF JOIST A 5 1/2" MTL STUDS @ 24" O.C. INTERIOR (1) LAYER 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYP. BD. (1) LAYER 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYP. BD. BATT INSULATION BOTTOM OF JOIST UNLESS NOTED D NOT RATED 5 1/2 MTL STUDS @ 16" O.C., 5/8" GYP. BD. EA. SIDE. INTERIORNOT RATED 2X6 WD STUDS @ 16 O.C. 5/8" GYP. BD. 2x6 WD STUDS @ 16" O.C., 5/8" GYP. BD. ONE SIDE.VARIES Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 9/13/2023 9:42:45 AM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 3_ 09-12-2023.rvt A1-101 MAIN FLOOR PLAN 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 09-13-2023 PRS JM 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1/8" = 1'-0"A1-101 1 MAIN FLOOR - PROPOSED PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0"A1-101 2 MAIN FLOOR - DEMO PLAN DEMOLITION NOTES: 1. UPON DEMOLITION IF THERE IS CONFLICTING INFORMATION CONSULT THE ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH DEMOLITION. 2. FOR WALLS THAT DO NOT EXTEND TO STEEL ROOF DECKING, THE ARCHITECT / ENGINEER DO NOT HAVE TO BE NOTIFIED TO PROCEED UNLESS THE CONTRACTOR BELIEVES THERE ARE OTHER CONSIDERATIONS. 3. SEE NOTES REGARDING WALLS THAT EXTEND TO THE STEEL DECKING. 4. CONTACT THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER / ARCHITECT AFTER PARTIAL REMOVAL TO DRYWALL SO THE ENGINEER CAN INSPECT THE ROOF CONNECTIONS AND SLAB CONNECTIONS TO DETERMINE IF THE WALLS ARE USED FOR STRUCTURAL SHEAR LOADING ETC. PRIOR DEMOLISHING ENTIRE WALL. No. Description Date OFFICE / STO. VESTIBULE FOYER ME N ' S W O M E N ' S BAR AREA DRY STORAGE MECH. COAT CLO. OFFICE STAGE BA C K S T A G E GR E E N R M STO. KITCHEN LIQUOR STORAGE STO. RS T R M 3 DJ ENTRY / WAITING AREA ENTRY HOST STANDING POST REFER BAR EQUIPMENT DRAWING FOR BAR DETAILS BANQUETTE SEATING 4 S E A T E R B O O T H BANQUETTE SEATING PATIO SEATING COATS 2 SEATER REFER EQUIPMENT DRAWINGS FOR DETAIL NO W O R K 1779 SF VIP SEATING Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 9/13/2023 9:42:46 AM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 3_ 09-12-2023.rvt A1-102 MAIN FLOOR PLAN - FF&E 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 09-13-2023 SS PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1/8" = 1'-0"A1-102 1 MAIN FLOOR - FF&E No. Description Date A B C D E 1 2 3 4 20 ' - 9 5 / 8 " 9' - 7 1 / 2 " 7' - 5 7 / 8 " 11' - 0 1/2" 6' - 9 3 / 4 " 11' - 2 1/4" 25 ' - 0 7 / 8 " 39' - 5 1/4" 4' - 8 5 / 8 " 24 ' - 1 1 7 / 8 " 1204 SF STORAGE 83 SF ROOF ACCESS D30 A 72" DOOR W/ LOCK METAL RAILING 48" HT WALL LEGEND EXISTING WALL DEMOLISH NEW WALL REMOVE RAILING AND ADD WALL REPLACE RAILING DEMO WALL, WINDOW & DOORS Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:23 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt A1-201 MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 PRS JM 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1/8" = 1'-0"A1-201 2 MEZZANINE FLOOR - PROPOSED No. Description Date 1/8" = 1'-0"A1-201 1 MEZZANINE FLOOR - DEMO PLAN 149 SF MEN'S 138 SF WOMEN'S 7' - 11 1/2"9"7' - 4" AA A D7 D8 5' - 7 1/4"2' - 4 1/4" 2' - 0 3/4" 3' - 5" 3' - 11" 2' - 11" 3' - 1 1/2" 3' - 1" 5' - 1" 5' - 1" 3' - 1" 3' - 1" 3' - 1" 4' - 0 1/2"3' - 11"3' - 11"3' - 5" 6' - 1 3/4"3' - 10 1/2"5' - 10 3/4" 1' - 4"2' - 11 1/4"1' - 4" 6' - 3 1/4" A1-203 4 A1-203 6 A A A1-203 5 A1-2037 1' - 2 1/2"2' - 11 1/4"1' - 4" 7' - 11 1/2"7' - 4" 2' - 0" 3' - 0"3' - 0" 2' - 0" 2' - 0" 2' - 0" 3' - 10 1/2" 8' - 0 1/2"3' - 10 1/2" A1-203 3 A1-203 2 45 SF RSTRM 2 41 SF RSTRM 1 6' - 0 1/8" 6' - 10 1/4" D26 6' - 0 1/8" 6' - 7 5/8"4' - 7 1/2" 7' - 6 1/2" D27 MAX 2' - 10" 6" 3' - 6" 8" 10" 1' - 4"2' - 11 1/4"1' - 4" 5' - 7 1/4" MIN 2' - 3" MIRROR SCONCE VERIFY 8' - 4" 2' - 10" 5' - 6" VERIFY 8' - 4"GRAB BAR 1' - 6"3' - 6"3' - 2"3' - 1 1/4"3' - 0 3/4"4' - 5 1/4"1' - 10" 5' - 0"9' - 4"6' - 3 1/4" D7 8" 0" 3' - 6" 6" MAX 2' - 10" MIN 2' - 3" URINAL 20' - 7 1/4" 2' - 6" 5' - 10" MAX 2' - 10" 6" 3' - 6" 8" MIN 2' - 3" 1' - 2 1/2"2' - 11 1/4"1' - 4" 5' - 5 3/4" MIRROR SCONCE D8 5' - 6" 2' - 10" MIN 2' - 3" 8" 0" 3' - 6" 6" 2' - 10" 1' - 10"4' - 0 1/4"6 1/2"2' - 11 1/2"3' - 1"3' - 2"3' - 6"1' - 6" 5' - 10 1/4"9' - 9"5' - 0" 20' - 7 1/4" VERIFY 6' - 10" 2' - 6" 5' - 10" GRAB BAR MIRROR SCONCE TOILET SINK GRAB BAR 2' - 10" 6 1/2" 1' - 6" 2' - 11 1/8" VERIFY 7' - 9 5/8" 8" 3' - 6" 4" 5 5/8" VERIFY 6' - 0 1/8" 1' - 6"3' - 0 1/8"1' - 6" 2' - 10" 5 5/8" 4" 3' - 6" VERIFY 6' - 0 1/8" 2' - 11 1/8" 1' - 6" 6 1/2" 2' - 10" VERIFY 7' - 9 5/8" MIRROR SCONCE TOILET SINK GRAB BAR 1' - 7"2' - 11 1/8"1' - 6" 8" 2' - 10" Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:25 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt A1-203 RESTROOM ENLARGED PLAN & ELEVATION 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 SS PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-203 1 MAIN FLOOR - ENLARGED PLAN 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-203 4 MEN'S RESTROOM - ELEVATION 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-203 5 MEN'S RESTROOM - ELEVATION 2 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-203 6 WOMEN'S RESTROOM - ELEVATION 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-203 7 WOMEN'S RESTROOM - ELEVATION 2 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-203 2 RESTROOM 1 - ELEVATION 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-203 3 RESTROOM 2 - ELEVATION No. Description Date 5' - 5" 2 3/8" 2" 3' - 6" 6" MAX 2' - 10" VERIFY 7' - 2 3/8" 1' - 4"2' - 9 1/4"1' - 3 3/4" MIRROR SCONCE MIN 2' - 3" 4' - 4 3/8" 2' - 10" 1' - 6"3' - 6" VERIFY 7' - 2 3/8" 5' - 0" GRAB BAR GRAB BAR 7' - 3 1/8" 2' - 10" 4' - 4 3/8" VERIFY 7' - 2 3/8" 32 SF RSTRM 4 A1-2045 6 D6 A A 2' - 10" 8" 3' - 6" 6" 10" VERIFY 8' - 4" MIRROR SCONCE 1' - 10 1/2"1' - 11 3/4" 3' - 10 1/4" 1' - 11 3/4"1' - 10 1/2" 3' - 10 1/4" VERIFY 8' - 4" 36 SF RSTRM 3 NEW VANITY D12 A A 1' - 6"3' - 6" 7' - 3 1/8" A1-204 1A1-2043 2 5' - 0" 5' - 5" 1' - 10" 5' - 5 1/8" 3' - 9 3/8" Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:26 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt A1-204 RESTROOM ENLARGED PLAN & ELEVATION 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 PRS JM 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-204 1 RESTROOM 3 - ELEVATION 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-204 2 RESTROOM 3 - ELEVATION 2 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-204 3 RESTROOM 3 - ELEVATION 3 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-204 4 MAIN FLOOR - ENLARGED PLAN 3 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-204 5 RESTROOM 4 - ELEVATION 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-204 6 RESTROOM 4 - ELEVATION 2 1/2" = 1'-0"A1-204 7 MAIN FLOOR - ENLARGED PLAN 2 No. Description Date 1204 SF STORAGE - 2 83 SF ROOF ACCESS 99 S F EL E C T R I C A L 104 SF OFFICE 132 SF STORAGE 12 6 3 S F PA T I O S E A T I N G 270 SF STAGE AREA 330 SF DANCE FLOOR 1779 SF SEATED DINING 299 SF BATHROOM 811 SF KITCHEN 545 SF BAR AREA 21 4 S F CO O L E R 80 SF BATHROOM 225 SF STORAGE 54 SF STORAGE 90 S F BA T H R O O M 32 SF BATHROOM 237 SF SEATED DINING 13 5 S F GR E E N R O O M 500 SF ENTRY / WAITING AREA BACK ENTRY FOYER BAR AREA BATHROOM COATS COOLER DANCE FLOOR ELECTRICAL ENTRY / WAITING AREA FOYER GREEN ROOM HALLWAY KITCHEN MECH OFFICE PATIO SEATING ROOF ACCESS SEATED DINING STAGE AREA STAIRS & RAMP STORAGE STORAGE - 2 TOTAL AREA 12,030 SF 467 SF BACK ENTRY FOYER 378 SF OFFICE 60 SF COATS 545 SF 98 SF FOYER 82 SF FOYER 35 4 S F HA L L W A Y 342 SF STAIRS & RAMP 86 SF STAIRS & RAMP 501 SF 24 SF 214 SF 330 SF 99 SF 180 SF 135 SF 1072 SF 811 SF 500 SF 2991 SF 1263 SF 428 SF 463 SF 270 SF 467 SF 71 SF MECH 71 SF 8 SF STORAGE 39 S F ST O R A G E 13 SF STORAGE 10 1 S F HA L L W A Y 605 SF SEATED DINING 22 SF STAIRS & RAMP 24 SF COATS 380 SF 605 SF SEATED DINING 963 SF HALLWAY 1204 SF 83 SF Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:28 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt A1-300 AREA PLAN 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 SS PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1/8" = 1'-0"A1-300 1 MEZZANINE FLOOR - AREA PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"A1-300 2 MAIN FLOOR - AREA PLAN No. Description Date 1 2 3 4 PSR PAINT TILE TILE 1 2 3 4 PSR PAINT TILE TILE 1 2 3 4 PSR PAINT TILE TILE DANCE FLOOR TILE BY OWNER, VERIFY 1 2 3 4 SP-1 FRP EPOXY QUARRY TILE 1 2 3 4 ACT-1 PAINT TILE EPOXY 1 2 3 4 SP-1 PAINT WOOD EPOXY 1 2 3 4 SP-1 PAINT WOOD EPOXY 1 2 3 4 SP-1 PAINT WOOD EPOXY 1 2 3 4 SP-1 PAINT WOOD EPOXY 1 2 3 4 PSR PAINT TILE TILE / PC 1 2 3 4 PSR PAINT TILE TILE / PC 1 2 3 4 PSR PAINT TILE TILE / PC 1 2 3 4 SP-1 PAINT WOOD EPOXY 1 2 3 4 PSR PAINT WOOD EPOXY 1 2 3 4 PSR PAINT WOOD EPOXY STAGE FLOOR ENGINEERED WOOD FINISH, VERIFY QUARRY TILE W/ COVE BASE RA I S E D P A T I O S E A T I N G ENGINEERED WOOD FINISH ON STAIRS, VERIFY FLOOR FINISH TO REMAIN, NEW CEILING, WASHABLE NO W O R K 1 2 3 4 PSR PAINT TILE TILE 1 2 3 4 PSR PAINT TILE TILE 1 2 3 4 SP-1 PAINT WOOD EPOXY 1 2 3 4 PSR PAINT WOOD WOOD XXX XXX XXX CLNG BASE WALL FLOOR FINISH PLAN SYMBOLS DENOTES EXTENT OF WALL FINISH MATERIAL DENOTES TRANSITION OF FLOOR MATERIALS 1 = CEILING FINISH TYPE 2 = WALL FINISH TYPE 3 = BASE FINISH TYPE 4 = FLOOR FINISH TYPE CEILING FINISH SCHEDULE 2'X6' ACT CEILING - NEW: MFR: VERIFY COLOR: WHITE GRID: SUPRAFINE XL FIRE GUARD 9__ 16" EXPOSED TEE GRID COLOR: WHITE ACT-1 WASHABLE SP-1 WITH WASHABLE PAINT OPEN CEILING PSR PAINTED SHEETROCK WASHABLE NOTE: -EXISTING SPRINKLERS TO REMAIN. SPRINKLERS ABOVE AND BELOW NEW CEILING. -COMMON RESTROOM PARTITION FINISH TO BE POWDER COATED STEEL. FINISH PLAN NOTES 1.ALL EXISTING GYPSUM BOARD CEILINGS, SOFFITS AND DRYWALL PARTITIONS THAT ARE PATCHED SHALL BE PAINTED IN THEIR ENTIRETY. 2.GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL FLASH PATCH AND PREPARE ALL FLOORS AS REQUIRED TO RECEIVE SPECIFIED FLOORING MATERIAL. 3. CARPET CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SUBFLOOR PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. THEY SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT AND/OR THE TENANT'S REPRESENTATIVE IN WRITING OF ANY CONDITIONS WHICH WILL PREVENT THEM FROM PRODUCING SATISFACTORY FINISH WORK. 4. FLOORS MUST BE FREE OF DUST, OIL AND ALL FOREIGN MATTER. BUILDING MUST BE PREHEATED TO A MINIMUM OF 65°, 24 HOURS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FLOOR COVERING. CRACKS 1/16" OR MORE, HOLES, AND OTHER UNEVENNESS MUST BE FILLED WITH A LATEX BASE FLOOR FILLER, HIGH SPOTS MUST BE LEVELED. FLOOR MUST BE SWEPT CLEAN, WET MOPPED WITH WARM WATER AND SWEPT AGAIN. IF SWEEPING LEAVES A RESIDUE, FLOORS SHALL BE VACUUMED. 5.CARPET CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY UNACCEPTABLE FINISH WORK CAUSED BY SUBFLOOR CONDITIONS. 6. ALL VINYL OR RUBBER BASE TO BE CONTINUOUS ROLL TYPE WITH SEAMING TO OCCUR ONLY ON INSIDE CORNERS OR AT LEAST 12" FROM WRAPPED OUTSIDE CORNER. 7. 8. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL METAL ANGLES AND/OR MARBLE REDUCING SADDLES PER DETAILS, IN ADDITION TO ANY FLOOR LEVELING AS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR SMOOTH TRANSITION AT ALL STONE OR TILE FLOORING/MATERIAL TRANSITION POINTS. 9. WHERE STONE, MARBLE, LIMESTONE AND HARD SURFACE FLOORING IS SPECIFIED, G.C. SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING/APPLYING SEALANT AS SPECIFIED OR AS RECOMMENDED BY SUPPLIER, FOR A CLEAN, LASTING SURFACE. 10. FLOOR COVERING IN CLOSETS SHALL BE THE SAME AS THAT OF THE SPACE ONTO WHICH THE CLOSET OPENS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 11. WHEN A GLUE DOWN INSTALLATION IS SPECIFIED, CARPETS SHALL BE LAID WITH TIGHT BUTT SEAMS LAID TRUE WITH AN APPROVED BRAND OF WATERPROOF QUICK RELEASE CEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 12. CROSS JOINTS NECESSARY DUE TO LENGTH OF ROLLS RECEIVED, SHALL BE PLACED TO AVOID OCCURRENCE AT CONSPICUOUS LOCATIONS NEAR DOOR OR AT DOORWAYS AND ENTRIES PERPENDICULAR TO DOORS OR ENTRIES. SEAMS OCCURRING PARALLEL TO DOORS SHALL BE CENTERED DIRECTLY UNDER THE DOOR. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SEAMING DIAGRAM FOR ARCHITECT'S REVIEW. 13. SEAMS SHALL BE TRIMMED AND SEAMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 14. 15. 16. 17. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE FIRE-RETARDANT BLOCKING FOR BLINDS ON EXTERIOR WINDOWS THROUGHOUT. 18. IN AREAS WITH EXPOSED OPEN CEILINGS, GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THEIR SUBCONTRACTORS ARE TO PAINT ANY AND ALL EXPOSED SPRINKLER PIPES, CEILING SLABS, BEAMS AND IF NEEDED PATCH CEILING SLAB SMOOTH TO RECEIVE NEW FINISHES. REFER TO FINISH PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND SPECIFICATIONS. 19. PAINTING OF ANY SURFACES NOT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED TO BE PAINTED HEREIN OR ON DRAWINGS, BUT FOR WHICH PAINTING IS OBVIOUSLY NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT OR WORK WHICH COMES WITHIN THE INTENT OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS, SHALL BE INCLUDED AS THROUGH SPECIFIED AND INCLUDED IN SCOPE OF WORK OF CONTRACTOR WITHOUT EXCEPTIONS. 20. ALL WALLS (NEW AND EXISTING) SHALL BE PROPERLY PREPARED (SPACKLED, SANDED, ETC.) FOR PAINTING AND/OR WALL COVERING AS PER FINISH PLAN AND MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 21. ALL PAINTS SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PARTICULAR SURFACE. 22. ALL SURFACES WHICH ARE TO BE PAINTED SHALL RECEIVE (1) COAT OF PRIMER AND (2) COATS OF FINISH PAINT. (3) COATS TOTAL. NOTE THAT BOTH CONTRACTOR AND ITS PAINTING SUBCONTRACTOR TO INCLUDE IN SCOPE OF WORK PAINT TOUCH UP DUE TO ANY DAMAGE DONE DURING CONSTRUCTION AS CAUSED BY NO FAULT OF THE PAINTING SUBCONTRACTOR BUT WHICH MIGHT OF BEEN CAUSED BY OTHER TRADES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CONSTRUCTION TRADES, VOICE/DATA AND SECURITY CONTRACTOR AND INCLUDING FURNITURE INSTALLERS AND MOVERS. CONTRACTOR AND PAINTING SUBCONTRACTOR TO INCLUDE PAINT TOUCH UP WITHIN THEIR SCOPE OF WORK WITHOUT EXCEPTION OR EXCLUSION FROM BIDS. 23. ALL WALLS, GYPSUM BOARD CEILINGS AND SOFFITS TO BE PAINTED SHALL BE PAINTED WITH A LATEX BASE EGGSHELL FINISH PAINT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL DOORS, DOOR FRAMES, WINDOW FRAMES, AND CONVECTOR ENCLOSURES SHALL BE PAINTED WITH AN ALKYD BASE SEMIGLOSS FINISH PAINT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CONVECTOR ENCLOSURES TO BE PAINTED SHALL HAVE THE GRILLES AND ACCESS PANELS REMOVED AND PAINTED SEPARATELY AND REINSTALLED WHEN THOROUGHLY DRY. ALL DOORS AND FRAMES TO BE PAINTED THE SAME COLOR AND TYPE OF PAINT ON BOTH SIDES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL WALLS, CEILINGS, SOFFITS AND SURFACES WHICH HAVE BEEN PAINTED WITH AN EGGSHELL FINISH AND MUST BE TOUCHED UP AS A PUNCH LIST ITEM SHALL BE REPAINTED ENTIRELY BETWEEN THE (2) CLOSEST BREAK POINTS. SAMPLES OF ALL FINISHES SPECIFIED SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT / DESIGNER FOR APPROVAL, IN TRIPLICATE, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK. CARPET, WALL COVERING, AND WOOD FINISH SAMPLES TO BE A MIN. 12" X 12". PAINT SAMPLES FOR GYPSUM BOARD. SURFACES TO BE PROVIDED ON 12"X12" PIECES OF GYPSUM BOARD. EXTRA MATERIALS: 1. PROVIDE 10 S.F. OF EACH SIZE, COLOR AND SURFACE FINISH OF TILE SPECIFIED. 2. PROVIDE 1 GALLON OF EACH FLOOR CLEANER. PROTECTION MATERIALS: 1. DO NOT PERMIT TRAFFIC OVER FINISHED FLOOR SURFACE FOR 4 DAYS AFTER INSTALLATION. 2. PROVIDE TWO LAYERS OF CRAFT PAPER OVER ALL TILE AND GROUT ON FLOORS. TAPE DOWN AND STAGGER SEAMS BY HALF THE WIDTH ON SECOND LAYER. SUBSTITUTIONS: 1. MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE PRE-APPROVED BY INTERIOR DESIGNER / TENANT PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS AND OR CONSTRUCTION / PLACING THOSE MATERIALS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE OF ALL MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS. Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:30 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt A1-301 FINISH PLAN 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 SS PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1/8" = 1'-0"A1-301 1 FINISH PLAN - MAIN FLOOR 1/8" = 1'-0"A1-301 2 FINISH PLAN - MEZZANINE FLOOR NOTE: No. Description Date 1. PLAN SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND TO CONVEY DESIGN INTENT. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. 2. MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH LANDLORD REQUIREMENTS AND BUILDING AS REQUIRED. 3. VERIFY ALL REQUIRED ACCESS PANEL SIZES AND LOCATIONS AT GYP. BD. CEILINGS. PROVIDE FLUSH ACCESS PANELS AT ALL EQUIPMENT, VALVES, DAMPERS, CONTROLS, CLEAN OUTS, ETC. PAINT TO MATCH CEILING FINISH. 4. ALL CEILING MATERIAL MUST HAVE CLASS "A" FIRE RATING. 5. SUPPORT WIRES FOR CEILING SUSPENSION SHALL BE ANCHORED TO STRUCTURE ABOVE AND AS REQUIRED BY LANDLORD. SUPPORT WIRES SHALL NOT BE CONNECTED TO ANY MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING OR FIRE PROTECTION PIPING OR EQUIPMENT. 6. SPRINKLER HEADS AT GYPSUM BOARD CEILINGS MUST BE FULLY RECESSED AND COVERED WITH METAL PLATES FINISHED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. 7. CENTER SPRINKLER HEADS, DIFFUSERS, LIGHT FIXTURES, AND OTHER RECESSED OR SURFACE MOUNTED ITEMS IN CEILING TILES. 8. PAINT OUT ALL DIFFUSERS, SPEAKERS, TRIM RINGS, AND EXPOSED DUCTS TO MATCH CEILING FINISH. 9. ALL GYP. BD. CEILINGS & SOFFITS SHALL HAVE LEVEL 5 FINISH & SHALL BE PAINTED. 10. WHERE PORTION OF EXISTING CEILING OR SOFFIT HAS BEEN IMPACTED BY DEMOLITION, PATCH, REFINISH OR REPLACE EXISTING CEILING AS REQUIRED TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITION, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 11. CENTER CEILING GRID IN ROOM UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL REMAIN OPERATIONAL THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING DURING THE PROJECT. WHEN TAKEN OUT OF SERVICE FOR TENANT WORK, A FIRE WATCH IS REQUIRED IN AREAS OF THE BUILDING AFFECTED BY THE SHUTDOWN. 13. ELECTRICAL / LIGHTING CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE EMERGENCY LIGHTING AT THE APPROXIMATELY LOCATIONS INDICATED SPACING TO MEET OR EXCEED BUILDING CODE, SEE 2020 MN BUILDING CODE AND BUT NOT LIMITED TO SECTIONS 1008, SUBSECTIONS 1008.2, 1008.3, SUBSECTION 1008.5 14. ILLUMINATION LEVELS NOT LESS THAN AN AVERAGE OF 1 FOOT CANDLE, STAIRWAY ILLUMINATION PER SECTION 1204.4, EXTERIOR LIGHT PER SECTION 1204.5. 15. ALL EMERGENCY LIGHTING AND ILLUMINATED EXITING SIGNS ON BATTERY BACK-UP POWER SUPPLY TO MEET OR EXCEED CODE. 16. SELECTIONS / DESIGN BUILD BY CONTRACTOR / INTERIOR DESIGNER. 17. BATHROOMS AND JANITORIAL CLOSETS: BATHROOM FAN AND LIGHTS TO BE SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR 18. T.V. INPUTS BY CLIENTS / INTERIOR DESIGNER, VERIFY. 19. HEIGHT, LOCATION & SIZE OF PLUGMOLD BY CONTRACTOR 20. OUTLETS PER CODE WHERE NOT INDICATED, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY. VERIFY HEIGHTS WITH TENANTS & DESIGNER. vERIFY WHERE USB COMBINATION OUTLETS ARE LOCATED. REFLECTED CEILING PLAN NOTES EXIT LIGHT W/ EMERGENCY LIGHTING LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION CEILING FINISH SCHEDULE 2'X6' ACT CEILING - NEW: MFR: VERIFY COLOR: WHITE GRID: SUPRAFINE XL FIRE GUARD 9__ 16" EXPOSED TEE GRID COLOR: WHITE ACT-1 WASHABLE SP-1 WITH WASHABLE PAINT OPEN CEILING PSR PAINTED SHEETROCK WASHABLE EXIT ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG NOTE: EXISTING SPRINKLERS TO REMAIN. SPRINKLERS ABOVE AND BELOW NEW CEILING. PSR PSR PSR SP-1 SP-1 SP-1 SP-1 SP-1 SP-1 SP-1 SP-1 SP-1 SP-1 SP-1 SP-1 SP-1 ACT-1 PST PSR PSR SP-1 EX I T EX I T EXIT EXIT EXIT EX I T EX I T EX I T EXIT EXIT EXIT EXIT FLOOR FINISH TO REMAIN, NEW CEILING, WASHABLE NO W O R K Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:31 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt A1-302 RCP 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 SS PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1/8" = 1'-0"A1-302 1 RCP - MAIN FLOOR 1/8" = 1'-0"A1-302 2 RCP - MEZZANINE FLOOR No. Description Date Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:33 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt A1-303 EMERGENCY EXIT PLAN 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 SS PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1/8" = 1'-0"A1-303 1 EGRESS PLAN - MAIN FLOOR 1/8" = 1'-0"A1-303 2 EGRESS PLAN - MEZZANINE FLOOR No. Description Date MAIN FLOOR 0" 2ND FLOOR 16' -3 1/4" MAIN CEILING 10' -0" TOP LVL 20' -0" GARAGE -11 1/2" MEZZANINE FLOOR 8' -4" NO CHANGE NEW 8' METAL FENCE MAIN FLOOR 0" 2ND FLOOR 16' -3 1/4" MAIN CEILING 10' -0" TOP LVL 20' -0" GARAGE -11 1/2" MEZZANINE FLOOR 8' -4" NO CHANGE NEW 8' METAL FENCE EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:35 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt A2-101 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 SS PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3/16" = 1'-0"A2-101 3 NORTH ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"A2-101 4 SOUTH ELEVATION No. Description Date MAIN FLOOR 0" 2ND FLOOR 16' -3 1/4" MAIN CEILING 10' -0" TOP LVL 20' -0" GARAGE -11 1/2" MEZZANINE FLOOR 8' -4" NO CHANGE MAIN FLOOR 0" 2ND FLOOR 16' -3 1/4" MAIN CEILING 10' -0" TOP LVL 20' -0" GARAGE -11 1/2" MEZZANINE FLOOR 8' -4" D2D1W1W1W1W1W1W1W1W1W1W1W1 EE NO CHANGE NEW 8' METAL FENCE NEW WINDOW NEW DOOR EXISTING WINDOW Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:37 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt A2-102 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 PRS JM 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3/16" = 1'-0"A2-102 1 EAST ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"A2-102 2 WEST ELEVATION No. Description Date MAIN FLOOR 0" 2ND FLOOR 16' -3 1/4" MAIN CEILING 10' -0" TOP LVL 20' -0" GARAGE -11 1/2" MEZZANINE FLOOR 8' -4" NO CHANGE MAIN FLOOR 0" 2ND FLOOR 16' -3 1/4" MAIN CEILING 10' -0" TOP LVL 20' -0" GARAGE -11 1/2" MEZZANINE FLOOR 8' -4" D2D1W1W1W1W1W1W1W1W1W1W1W1 EE NO CHANGE NEW 8' METAL FENCE NEW WINDOW NEW DOOR EXISTING WINDOW MAINTAIN EXISTING OPENING, VERIFY PATCH EXISTING OPENING W/ SQUARED CONC. BLOCK TO MATCH EXISTING NEW 8' METAL FENCE PATCH EXISTING OPENING W/ SQUARED CONC. BLOCK TO MATCH EXISTING NO CHANGE NO CHANGE Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 9/ 1 1 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 3 3 : 5 0 P M C : \ U s e r s \ p i x o x \ O n e D r i v e - R a y s De s i g n s \ S h a r e d P U B L I C \ P r o j e c t s \ P r o j e c t _ 2 0 2 3 \ 2 3 7 1 0 - R S D - 5 9 2 7 J o h n M a r t i n D r , B r o o k l y n c e n t e r , M N 5 5 4 30 _ S i m o n e \ 0 5 - R e v i t \ 5 9 2 7 J o h n M a r t i n D r - C D - R e v i si o n 2 _ 0 8 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 3 . r v t A2-102 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 PRS JM 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3/16" = 1'-0"A2-102 1 EAST ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"A2-102 2 WEST ELEVATION No. Description Date SINGLE FLUSH WOOD SWING DOOR GLASS GARAGE DOOR (NON OPERATIONAL SURFACE APPLIED) DOOR TYPES A B SEE SCHEDULE SEE SCHEDULE SEE SCHEDULE SEE SCHEDULE FRAME TYPES WOOD FRAME F1 3"SEE SCHEDULE 3" SEE SCHEDULE 3" 2 1/4"SEE SCHEDULE 2 1/4" SEE SCHEDULE 4" H.M. FRAME F2 KEY LEGEND EXISTING WINDOWE E EXISTING DOORHM HEAD DETAIL WINDOW JAMB HM SILL DETAIL 5/8" GYP. BD.5/8" GYP. BD. SEALANT JT. TYP EA SIDE INSTALL SEALANT PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS 5/8" GYP. BD.5/8" GYP. BD. INSULATION METAL STUD HEADER TRACK INSULATION SEALANT JT. TYP EA SIDE SEALANT JT. TYP EA SIDE 5/8" GYP. BD.5/8" GYP. BD. INSULATION JAMB STUDS INSTALL SEALANT PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:38 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt A6-101 DOOR/WINDOW SCHEDULES & DETAILS 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 SS PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-101 1 WD INTERIOR DOOR HEAD DETAIL (JAMB SIM.) 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-101 2 HM HEAD DETAIL @ ETAL STUD (JAMB SIM.) NOTE: •DOOR AND HARDWARE TO BE SELECTED & FINALISED BY OWNER / INTERIOR DESIGNER. •ALL EXIT DOOR TO REQUIRE ADA / ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE HARDWARE. •EXISTING HARDWARE TO REMAIN IF IN CODE COMPLIANCE. •DOOR WOOD SPECIES AND FINISH TO BE SELECTED BY INTERIOR DESIGNER/ OWNER / CONTRACTOR. •IF WOOD DOOR CASING IS NOT TO BE USED AT DOOR FRAMES INSTALL A TEARBEAD IN CAULK JOINT. •CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH INTERIOR DESIGNER / OWNER WHETHER OR NOT A DOOR FINISH CASING IS REQUIRED GLASS TYPE DESIGNATION: IG = INSULATED AND TEMPERED GLAZING TC = TEMPERED CLEAR GLAZING D-1 = 1 HR FIRE RESISTANT GLAZING DOOR -D-1 (1 HR. RATED GLAZING -SUPPLIER TO INCLUDE TEST DATA INDICATING SIZE AND AREA IS COMPLIANT WITH 2020 MN B.C. SECTION 716.2.2.3.1. LISTED FIRERESISTANCE RATING) DOOR SCHEDULE Mark Width Height Description Door Type Frame Type Glass Type Comments GARAGE D25 9' - 10 7/8" 12' - 0" MAIN FLOOR D1 10' - 4 3/4" 9' - 10 3/4" 2-1/8" Thick Aluminum Sectional Door B F1 TC D2 10' - 4 3/4" 9' - 10 3/4" 2-1/8" Thick Aluminum Sectional Door B F1 TC D3 2' - 6" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D4 2' - 6" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D5 3' - 0" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D6 3' - 0" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D7 3' - 0" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D8 3' - 0" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D11 3' - 0" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D12 2' - 6" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D13 3' - 0" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D14 3' - 0" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D16 5' - 8" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D17 3' - 0" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D18 5' - 8" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D19 5' - 8" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D20 5' - 8" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D26 3' - 0" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D27 3' - 0" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D28 3' - 0" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 D29 3' - 0" 6' - 8"BIFOLD A D31 3' - 0" 6' - 8"SINGLE PANEL WOOD SWING DOOR A F2 DOOR WITH LOCK MEZZANINE FLOOR D30 6' - 0" 7' - 0"DOUBLE PANEL SWING DOOR A6-101 3 DOOR THRESHOLD DETAIL 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-101 4 WINDOW HEAD, SILL AND JAMB WINDOW SCHEDULE Type Mark Width Height Head Height Description Count Comments MAIN FLOOR W1 3' - 5" 3' - 0" 9' - 0 1/2"11 Grand total 11 No. Description Date 2X10 @ 16" O.C. 3/4" PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR GLUED/SCREWED WOOD FLOORING 2X6 WOOD STUDS @ 16" O.C. 10' - 3 1/16"4' - 7 13/16" 10 3/4" 2' - 1 1/4" 6" METAL STUDS@ 16" O.C. 2 X 6 TRTD BOTTOM PLATE ON SILL SEALER 2 X 6 DOUBLE TOP PLATE 3' - 0" 11 1/2" 1"6 1/2" 8' - 8 3/4" 3 1/2" 3' - 4" 3' - 7 1/2" COUNTERTOP FRP OVER 5/8" WATER PROOF SHEET ROCK FINISH MATERIAL OVER PLYWOOD SHEATHING BY OWNER EXTEND FRP UNDER COUNTERTOP COVE BASE OVER WATERPROOFING6" METAL STUDS@ 16" O.C. 2' - 1" 6" COVED BASE WALL FINISH FLOOR FINISH BASE C INTERIORNOT RATED 2X4 MTL STUDS @ 16 O.C. 1/2" GYP. BD. 4 MTL STUDS @ 16" O.C., 1/2" GYP. BD. ONE SIDE. WALL TYPES 1.ALL WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO BOTTOM OF ROOF DECK, EXCEPT AS NOTED. USE SLIP-TRACK AT TOP OF WALLS CONSTRUCTED TO DECK. PROVIDE W.R. (WATER RESISTANT) GYPSUM BACKING BOARD IN TOILET ROOMS, AND JANITORS CLOSET. 2.INSTALL WALL FLUSH WITH EXISTING WALL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE NOT RATED EXISTING WALLS TO REMAINEXISTING MARK DESCRIPTIONRATINGPLAN NOTES NOTES: HEIGHT EXISTING BOTTOM OF JOIST A 5 1/2" MTL STUDS @ 24" O.C. INTERIOR (1) LAYER 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYP. BD. (1) LAYER 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYP. BD. BATT INSULATION BOTTOM OF JOIST UNLESS NOTED D NOT RATED 5 1/2 MTL STUDS @ 16" O.C., 5/8" GYP. BD. EA. SIDE. INTERIORNOT RATED 2X6 WD STUDS @ 16 O.C. 5/8" GYP. BD. 2x6 WD STUDS @ 16" O.C., 5/8" GYP. BD. ONE SIDE.VARIES Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:39 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt A6-102 DETAILS 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 SS PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-102 1 SECTION - STAGE 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-102 3 SECTION - BAR COUNTER DETAIL 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A6-102 4 COVE BASE DETAIL, TYP. No. Description Date 4. SAMPLES: MILLWORK, STAIN, PAINT, CABINET AND DOOR HARDWARE 29. SUBMISSIONS - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING ITEMS TO 3. SHOP DRAWINGS: CABINETS, WINDOWS, APPLIANCES, PLUMBING FIXTURES IN ADVANCE AND OBTAIN THE OWNERS APPROVAL IN WRITING BEFORE EXISTING BUILDING, NOTIFY THE DESIGNER AND THE OWNER 72 HOURS FOR REVIEW BY THE DESIGNER AND APPROVAL OF THE OWNER, A a. BEFORE COMMENCING ANY ALTERATION OR DEMOLITION WORK, SUBMIT b. PROPER TESTING FOR AND THE REMOVAL OF ANY ASBESTOS SHALL BE IN WILL TEMPORARILY DISCONTINUE OR DISRUPT SERVICE TO THE (ELECTRICAL, SEWER, WATER, HEAT, GAS, FIRE LINES, ETC.) THAT b. BEFORE STARTING ANY WORK RELATING TO EXISTING UTILITIES COMPLETION DATES FOR THE VARIOUS PARTS OF THIS WORK. SCHEDULE SHOWING THE COMMENCEMENT, THE ORDER, AND THE SPECIFICATION, COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS AND 2. DISCONNECTING, REMOVAL, AND/OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING 1. REINFORCING, CUTTING, AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS OF EXISTING OR SPECIFIED AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE a) WORK INCLUDED. PERFORM ALTERATIONS AND RELATED WORK AS SHOWN RECOMMENDATION OF ANSI A10.2, SAFETY CODE FOR BUILDING a. EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BY GOVERNING CODES AND BY THIS MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK, INCLUDING EQUIPMENT. BUILDING AFFECTED BY THE OPERATIONS UNDER THIS SECTION BY DUST a. REMOVE DEBRIS AS THE WORK PROGRESSES. MAINTAIN PREMISES GUARANTEE BONDS ARE IN FORCE AND EXECUTE THE WORK SO AS NOT INSTALLED. CONSULT THE OWNER TO ASCERTAIN IF EXISTING PROTECTION AS REQUIRED UNTIL NEW ROOFING AND FLASHING ARE REMOVE INSULATION AND SO ON. PROVIDE TEMPORARY WEATHERTIGHT WORK. CUT AND FOLD BACK EXISTING BUILT-UP ROOFING. CUT AND THE LIMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER INSTALLATION OF THE NEW k. CONFINE CUTTING OF EXISTING ROOF AREAS DESIGNATED TO REMAIN TO TO PROPERLY PROVIDE FOR PATCHING AND REPAIR OF THE RESPECTIVE j. CUT OUT IMBEDDED ANCHORAGE AND ATTACHMENT ITEMS AS REQUIRED PUT IN PERFECT WORKING ORDER. REFINISH AS DIRECTED. REUSED, REPAIR SUCH EQUIPMENT AND/OR FIXTURES AND REFINISH TO i. WHERE EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND/OR FIXTURES ARE INDICATED TO BE WORK. CLEAN EXISTING SURFACES OF DIRT, GREASE. LOOSE PAINT, h. FINISH NEW AND ADJACENT EXISTING SURFACES AS SPECIFIED FOR NEW TRADES THAT NORMALLY PERFORM PARTICULAR ITEMS OF WORK. ALTERATION WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE VARIOUS RESPECTIVE SPECIFIED, SHALL CONFORM TO THAT OF THE ORIGINAL WORK. EMPLOYED IN THE ALTERATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR COMMENCING OF THE WORK. THE MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP LEAVE IN AS GOOD A CONDITION AS EXISTED PRIOR TO THE MUCH THEREOF AS IS REQUIRED BY THE INVOLVED CONDITIONS, AND REMOVE, PATCH, REPAIR, OR REFINISH THE ADJACENT SURFACES OR SO g. WHERE ALTERATIONS OCCUR, OR NEW AND OLD WORK JOIN, CUT, NECESSARY TO PREVENT COLLAPSE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION, INSTALL f. IN GENERAL, DEMOLISH MASONRY IN SMALL SECTIONS. WHERE LEAST POSSIBLE DISTURBANCE TO THE PUBLIC AND TO THE OCCUPANTS e. EXECUTE THE WORK IN A CAREFUL AND ORDERLY MANNER, WITH THE THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER OR TO BE REINSTALLED SHALL BECOME d. MATERIALS OR ITEMS DEMOLISHED AND NOT DESIGNATED TO BECOME PROTECT AND STORE UNTIL REQUIRED. REPLACE MATERIAL OR ITEMS SUPERVISION OF THE TRADE RESPONSIBLE FOR REINSTALLATION; SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. REMOVE SUCH ITEMS WITH CARE UNDER THE c. MATERIALS OR ITEMS DESIGNATED TO BE REINSTALLED SHALL BE AS WITH CARE AND STORE THEM IN A LOCATION AT THE SITE TO BE OWNER SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. REMOVE SUCH ITEMS b. MATERIALS OR ITEMS DESIGNATED TO BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE WITH APPLICABLE TECHNICAL SECTIONS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS. PERFORM PATCHING, RESTORATION, AND NEW WORK IN ACCORDANCE PARTS OF EXISTING STRUCTURES OR ITEMS DESIGNATED FOR REUSE. DAMAGE THAT MAY BE CAUSED BY SUCH WORK TO ANY PART OR SHORING, BRACING, AND SO ON. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY THE DRAWINGS. PERFORM SUCH WORK WITH DUE CARE, INCLUDING a. DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND ALTERATION WORK SHALL BE SHOWN ON CONTENTS OF THE INSUFFICIENCY OF PROTECTION PROVIDED. g. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING STRUCTURE OR EGRESS. CONDUCT OPERATIONS WITH MINIMUM TRAFFIC INTERFERENCE. PLACE MATERIALS IN PASSAGEWAYS, STAIRS, OR OTHER MEANS OF WITHOUT THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE DESIGNER. DO NOT STORE OR f. DO NOT CLOSE OR OBSTRUCT WALKWAYS, PASSAGEWAYS, OR STAIRWAYS e. PROVIDE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL FIRE FROM THE ELEMENTS UNTIL SUCH OPENINGS ARE CLOSED BY NEW SIMILAR DEBRIS. PROTECT UNALTERED PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING RISING BY WETTING DEMOLISHED MASONRY, CONCRETE, PLASTER, AND d. TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT DUST AND DIRT FROM NEW WORK IS BEING DONE, CONNECTIONS MADE, MATERIALS HANDLED, STRUCTURE DESIGNATED TO REMAIN WHERE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL AND c. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY PROTECTION OF THE EXISTING SO AS TO FULLY PROTECT THE INTERIOR PREMISES AGAINST DAMAGE b. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN WEATHER PROTECTION AT EXTERIOR OPENINGS SHORING AND BRACING REQUIREMENTS SO AS TO PREVENT ANY DAMAGE WITH DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL. GIVE PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO ASCERTAIN ANT REQUIRED PROTECTIVE MEASURES BEFORE PROCEEDING a. MAKE SUCH EXPLORATIONS AND PROBES AS ARE NECESSARY TO OF CONSTRUCTION DUST, LABELS, STAINS, SPOTS, FOREIGN MATTER AND SHALL PROVIDE ALL TEMPORARY HEAT, LIGHT, POWER AND WATER DURING THE TERM OF THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. MARKINGS. ALL FILTERS SHALL BE REPLACED AND ALL CONSTRUCTION SHOP DRAWINGS ARE TO BE KEPT IN THIS OFFICE. ONLY APPROVED SHOP SHALL PROVIDE, ON THE PREMISES, A TEMPORARY OFFICE. DRAWINGS AND 27. TEMPORARY OFFICE AND MATERIALS STORAGE - THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR NEW WORK SHALL INDICATE ACCEPTANCE OF PRIOR WORK OR SURFACE BE DETRIMENTAL TO A SATISFACTORY FINAL RESULT. PROCEEDING WITH OTHERS TO INSPECT THIS WORK AND REPORT ANY CONDITIONS WHICH MAY CONTRACTOR DOING WORK OR INSTALLING MATERIAL OVER WORK DONE BY 26. VERIFICATION OF SURFACES - IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF EACH ON-SITE MATERIALS STORAGE AREAS WILL BE ESTABLISHED BY THE 25. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS - OWNER SHALL ESTABLISH CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. BE PROVIDED UNTIL THE WORK IS COMPLETE AND SHALL BE FOR THE USE 24. TELEPHONE SERVICE - PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN A TELEPHONE WHICH SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL GAS, ELECTRICAL AND WATER LINES BEFORE 28. TEMPORARY HEAT, LIGHT, POWER AND WATER - THE CONTRACTOR DRAWINGS SHALL BE KEPT ON FILE. PROVIDE STORAGE AND ENCLOSURES CONTRACTOR AND CONFORMED TO BY ALL SUB-CONTRACTORS. OF ALL CONTRACTORS AND THE DESIGNER OR REPRESENTATIVE. TO PROTECT AND PRESERVE ALL MATERIALS STORED ON THE SITE. SEWER CONNECTION BEFORE SETTING FLOOR ELEVATIONS, AND SHALL 23. UTILITIES - GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY INVERT AND LOCATION OF 22. BENCHMARK - GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A IF REQUIRED, SUBMITTALS SHALL BE CORRECTED AND RE-SUBMITTED. SPECIFICATIONS. DESIGNER AND OWNER SHALL REVIEW SUBMITTALS PROMPTLY THE DESIGNER FOR CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE WORK NOTED IN THE TECHNICAL 21. SHOP DRAWINGS - SHOP DRAWINGS AND/OR SAMPLES SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AGREEMENT. SUBMIT INSURANCE CERTIFICATE(S) CONTRACTOR IN DEFENSE OF ANY CLAIM OR SUIT ARISING OUT OF THE ACT OR OMISSIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR, INCURRED BY THE GENERAL INJURY TO PERSON OR PROPERTY OCCASIONED FULLY OR IN PART BY ANY OWNER AND DESIGNER HARMLESS FROM ANY LIABILITY ARISING FROM GENERAL CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INDEMNIFY AND SAVE COVERAGE. FIRE AND WIND STORM COVERAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED BY SUPPLIERS SHALL PROVIDE FULL LIABILITY AND WORKMEN S COMPENSATION 20. INSURANCE - THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUB-CONTRACTORS AND BENCHMARK TO BE USED TO SET ALL ELEVATIONS. COMMENCED UNTIL THE SUBMITTAL HAS BEEN APPROVED. NO PORTION OF THE WORK REQUIRING A SHOP DRAWING SHALL BE SUB-CONTRACTOR S RESPONSIBILITIES AND THE WORK UNDER THE LIGHT BULBS SHALL BE REPLACED WITH NEW ONES. CONDITIONS. TRENCHING OR EXCAVATING. TO OWNER. TO INVALIDATE SUCH BONDS. (NOT APPLICABLE IN THIS CONTRACT) 7. CLEANING UP: IN A NEAT AND CLEAN CONDITION. FINISHES. AND SO ON, BEFORE REFINISHING. 12. LIEN WAIVERS - AT THE TIME OF PAYMENT(S), THE CONTRACTOR AND 13. WARRANTY - THE CONTRACTOR AND SUB-CONTRACTORS SHALL FULLY GUARANTEE SUB-CONTRACTORS/SUPPLIERS SHALL FURNISH PROPER LIEN WAIVERS. DECORATED SURFACES TO THEIR ORIGINAL FINISH AND REMOVE ALL TRACES 19. FINAL CLEAN-UP - PRIOR TO THE OWNER S OCCUPANCY, THE CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR WILL PERFORM SUCH WORK AND DEDUCT COST FROM AND FINAL PHASES OF WORK. IF THIS CLEAN-UP IS NOT PERFORMED, OTHER MATERIALS RESULTING FROM THEIR WORK BOTH DURING ROUGH-IN FOR CLEANING UP AND REMOVAL OF WASTE MATERIALS, PACKING BOXES OR 18. SUB-CONTRACTOR CLEAN-UP - EACH SUB-CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE MISCELLANEOUS GARBAGE. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE A TRASH CAN FOR POP CANS, LUNCH SACKS AND THIS LOCATION AND SHALL NOT SPREAD TRASH ABOUT THE SITE. GENERAL THE PROJECT. SUB-CONTRACTORS SHALL PUT WASTE MATERIAL AND TRASH IN 17. CLEAN-UP - GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH ONE TRASH DUMPSTER NEAR OF WORK THEY HAVE LEFT NO HAZARDOUS OR UNSAFE CONDITIONS. SUB-CONTRACTORS SHALL ENSURE THAT AT THE END OF THE DAY OR PHASE 16. SITE SAFETY - GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND SUB-CONTRACTORS SHALL VOID. OWNER SHALL USE THE UNPAID BALANCE OF THE CONTRACT TO WORKING DAYS OR THE CONTRACT SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE BREACHED AND OWNER WILL GIVE NOTICE IN WRITING TO PERFORM WORK WITHIN THREE WORKING DAYS, THE CONTRACTOR OR SUB-CONTRACTOR HAS NOT COMPLIED, HARDWARE, TILE ,MARBLE, GLASS, CARPET, PAINTED, STAINED AND SHALL CLEAN, POLISH AND RETOUCH ALL FIXTURES, EQUIPMENT, FOR OVERALL CLEAN UP AND TRASH REMOVAL. MAINTAIN PREMISES IN SAFE AND HAZARD-FREE CONDITION FINISH OR PAY OTHERS TO FINISH THE WORK. CONTRACTOR TO FULFILL THE TERMS OF HIS CONTRACT. IF AFTER FIVE CONTRACT, AND HIRE OTHER SUB-CONTRACTOR(S) TO COMPLETE THE WORK. COMMENCE, PROCEED, FINISH, OR CORRECT THE WORK SPECIFIED IN HIS 15. TERMINATION - IF THE CONTRACTOR OR SUB-CONTRACTOR FAILS TO TWO WEEKS OF AWARD OF CONTRACT, A COMPLETE TIME SCHEDULE FOR WORK. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DELIVER TO THE OWNER, WITHIN NOTICE OF SCHEDULE REQUIRED AND HAVE PREMISES READY FOR SUCH 14. SCHEDULE - SUB-CONTRACTORS/SUPPLIERS SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE FROM THE DESIGNER OR OWNER, AT NO COST TO THE OWNER, INCLUDING SPECIFICATIONS. CORRECTION SHALL BE MADE PROMPTLY AFTER NOTICE THE DATE OF OCCUPANCY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE TECHNICAL ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF 12 MONTHS FROM NOTICE OF TERMINATION: OWNER SHALL GIVE VERBAL NOTICE TO CONTRACT IN A TIMELY MANNER, THE OWNER CAN TERMINATE THE COST OF RELATED WORK OF OTHER TRADES. SUB-CONTRACTOR. COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. TEMPORARY SHORES, STRUTS, OR BRACING. OF THE BUILDING. THE OWNER'S PROPERTY. DAMAGED IN ITS REMOVAL WITH SIMILAR NEW MATERIAL. DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER. 6. WORKMANSHIP: PROOF PARTITIONS AND OTHER ADEQUATE MEANS. DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION , FOURTEENTH EDITION 1997, IS PART OF 2. SUPPLEMENTS - AIA DOCUMENT A201 GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPLICABLE GUIDES AND STANDARDS FOR THAT TRADE. LABOR SHALL BE PERFORMED IN A GOOD, WORKMANSHIP MANNER. ALL WORK EMPLOY ONLY WORKERS SKILLED IN THEIR RESPECTIVE TRADE(S); ALL SUCH PROTECTION IS ESSENTIAL TO THEIR QUALITY AND SHALL BE STORED EQUIPMENT. MATERIALS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM THE WEATHER WHERE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPER STORAGE OF THEIR MATERIALS, TOOLS, AND 9. STORAGE OF MATERIALS - THE CONTRACTOR AND SUB-CONTRACTORS SHALL BE 8. MATERIALS - ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE NEW AND OF GOOD QUALITY, OF THE OR OTHERWISE TO THE GENERAL CONTRACTORS SATISFACTION THE SCOPE, 7. TERMS - EACH SUB-CONTRACTOR/SUPPLIER SHALL MAKE CLEAR IN WRITING MINNESOTA UNIFORM BUILDING CODES AND OTHER LOCAL HEALTH AND 5. CODES - ALL WORK AND CONTRACTORS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE STATE OF ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF ANY INACCURACY OR DISCREPANCY IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OR DRAWINGS. SUB-CONTRACTORS NOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ADVANTAGE OF AGREED UPON IN WRITING BEFORE THE CHANGE IS MADE, IF SUCH CHANGE 11. CHANGES - ANY CHANGE IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OR DRAWINGS MUST BE WILL INCREASE OR DECREASE THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION. 10. WORKMANSHIP - THE CONTRACTOR AND SUB-CONTRACTOR SHALL OFF THE GROUND FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STANDING WATER. GRADE, FINISH AND COLOR SPECIFIED OR AN APPROVED EQUAL. BUILDING ORDINANCES THAT ARE APPLICABLE. 4. IT IS THE INTENTION OF THE PARTIES HERETO THAT NEITHER THIS CONTRACT, AND IS INCORPORATED HEREIN AS FULLY AS IF HERE SET FORTH. DRAWINGS TO CORRESPOND AND TO EMBODY EVERY ITEM AND PART REVERSE, THE SAME SHALL BE FOLLOWED AS IF SET FORTH IN BOTH, AS AND ARE TO BE OF EQUAL FORCE. SHOULD ANYTHING BE MENTIONED IN WITH THESE SPECIFICATIONS ARE TO FORM THE BASIS OF THE CONTRACT 3. THE PLANS, ELEVATIONS, SECTIONS, AND DETAIL DRAWINGS, TOGETHER NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE STRUCTURE. IT IS THE INTENT OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCOMPANYING THESE SPECIFICATIONS AND NOT SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS, OR THE TERMS AND SCHEDULE OF HIS WORK. THE DESIGNER FOR INTERPRETATION. 5. PROTECTION: TO EXISTING CONSTRUCTION. OR EQUIPMENT MOVED. CONSTRUCTION. PROCEEDING WITH THIS PHASE OF THE WORK. 4. SCHEDULING: b) WORK OF OTHER SECTIONS: SECTION 180 - DEMOLITIONS/ALTERATIONS 3. STANDARDS: 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS 2. SCOPE: STRICT CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES. CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. STRUCTURAL MATERIAL. UPON EVERY SUB-CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. CONTRACT GIVEN UNDER THESE SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE BINDING 1. THE GENERAL CONDITIONS HEREIN SET FORTH SHALL APPLY TO ANY DIVISION 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS SECTION 100 - GENERAL CONDITIONS THE OWNER AND DESIGNER FOR APPROVAL: 6. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE 2. WORK SCHEDULE 5. LIEN WAIVERS 1. SCHEDULE OF VALUES 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS ITEMS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFIED HEREIN. EQUIPMENT AND RELATED ITEMS NECESSARY TO FURNISH ALL CABINETRY 2. SCOPE - THE WORK UNDER THIS SECTION INCLUDES ALL MATERIALS, LABOR, 8. WARRANTY - SHALL WARRANTY WORK FOR 1 YEAR AND SHALL INCLUDE 1 7. TUB, SHOWER WALLS AND CEILING - 1/2" DUROCK AS MANUFACTURED BY 6. CEILINGS AND 24" O.C. FRAMING - 5/8" GYPSUM DRYWALL. SW BOARD BY U.S. 5. WALLS AND 16" O.C. FRAMING - 5/8" GYPSUM DRYWALL. SW BOARD BY 4. DELIVERY - GYPSUM BOARD SUPPLIER SHALL DELIVER MATERIAL INTO HOUSE ON 3. INSTALLATION - ALL GYPSUM DRYWALL SHALL BE TAPED, SANDED COMPLETELY 2. QUALITY - ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE 9. CLEAN-UP - INSTALLER SHALL REMOVE ALL GYPSUM BOARD SCRAP AND BROOM 2. REFER TO PLANS FOR ITEMS TO BE PROVIDED. THE FEWEST NUMBER OF SPLICES POSSIBLE. 11. FINISH - STAIN AND FINISH BY PAINTING CONTRACTOR. SUBMIT SAMPLES FOR 10. SHOP DRAWINGS - PROVIDE COMPLETE SET OF SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ALL 9. SAMPLES - SUBMIT SAMPLES FOR APPROVAL OF ALL MILLWORK ITEMS. 6. MITERS - ALL JOINTS AND INTERSECTIONS SHALL BE MITERED. 5. INSTALLATION - MILLWORK SHALL BE INSTALLED IN FULL LENGTHS WITH IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO ORDERING AND SHALL CONSULT THE CONTRACTOR 4. FIELD VERIFICATION - MILLWORK SUPPLIER SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS DESIGNER AND OWNER APPROVAL. SECTION 641 - CABINETRY - BY OWNER MILLWORK ITEMS. 7. BASE - SEE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR DETAILS. AT THE TIME OF MEASUREMENT. 3. SCHEDULE - PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR, APPROVED BY OWNER. 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS SECTION 622 - MILLWORK PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. CLEAN HOUSE AT COMPLETION OF HANGING. RESISTANCE GREEN BOARD ON WALLS AND CEILING IN ALL BATHROOMS. U.S. GYPSUM - FULL HEIGHT ON WALLS AT TUB AND SHOWER. WATER APPROPRIATE FLOOR, PROTECTED FROM MOISTURE AS WELL AS POSSIBLE. SMALLER USEABLE PIECES SHALL BE USED IN CLOSETS, ETC. TO MINIMIZE PRACTICAL LENGTH SHALL BE USED TO MINIMIZED JOINTS IN ROOMS. SHALL BE NAILED SECURELY TO STUDS OR FRAMING. SHEETS OF MAXIMUM WITH METAL CORNER BEAD AT ALL OUTSIDE CORNERS. ALL CORNER BEADS OR DOUBLE NAILED AT 12" O.C. IN FIELD AND 8" O.C. AT VERTICAL EDGES, SMOOTH AND PREPARED FOR PAINTING. GYPSUM BOARD SHALL BE SCREWED RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE U.S. GYPSUM HANDBOOK. TRIP TO TOUCH UP ANY BLEMISHES OR FLAWS, FOLLOWING PAINTING AND U.S. GYPSUM. MATERIAL WASTE. DIVISION 8 - DOORS, WINDOWS AND GLASS 3. MATERIAL - MATCH EXISTING IF APPLIES. SUBMIT NEW MATERIAL FOR APPROVAL 2. WOOD STILE AND RAIL DOORS - SHALL MEET THE LATEST EDITION OF THE 3. SAMPLES - SUBMIT SAMPLES FOR APPROVAL. 2. HARDWARE SCHEDULE BY OWNER. SECTION 870 - FINISH HARDWARE AND ACCESSORIES 4. INSTALLATION - HARDWARE AND ACCESSORIES INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. 1. GENERAL CONTRACTORS 4. SCHEDULE - PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS AND SCHEDULE. SECTION 810 - DOORS 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS SECTION 925 - GYPSUM DRYWALL 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS DIVISION 9 - FINISHES INSTALLATION. STACK WASTE IN A SINGLE PILE. REASONABLY ORDERLY MANNER AND SHALL BROOM CLEAN JOB DURING 4. CLEAN-UP - CARPENTERS SHALL MAINTAIN MILLWORK STOCKPILE IN A NOTIFY OWNER PROMPTLY OF ANY MISSING OR DEFICIENT MATERIAL. 3. MATERIAL - CARPENTERS SHALL INSPECT MILLWORK UPON DELIVERY AND FITTED. ALL INSTALLATION OF MILLWORK SHALL BE WITH JOURNEYMAN 2. FINISH CARPENTRY - ALL WORK SHALL BE FLUSH, PLUMB, AND TIGHTLY EXPERIENCED AND SKILLED IN THE TRADE. 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS SECTION 611 - FINISH CARPENTRY REASONABLY ORDERLY MANNER AND SHALL BROOM CLEAN JOB ONCE A WEEK. 7. CLEAN-UP - CARPENTERS SHALL MAINTAIN LUMBER STOCKPILE IN A 6. BACKING - INSTALL BACKING FOR ALL CABINETRY, MILLWORK AND HARDWARE. 2X6 FRAMING. SHEATHING TO OVERLAP BLOCK WITH EXTERIOR FACE OF RIM 5. LAYOUT - EXTERIOR WALLS ARE DIMENSIONED AT 5-1/2 WHICH INCLUDES PROTRUDE FROM WASTE LUMBER ON TEMPORARY BRACING NOT IN USE. SCATTERED ABOUT THE SITE; ABSOLUTELY NO NAILS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO 4. FRAMING - SHALL BE LAID OUT TO MINIMIZE WASTE; LUMBER SHALL NOT BE VERIFY ACCURACY THROUGHOUT THE FRAMING PROCESS. FITTED. FRAMING SHALL BE LEVEL, PLUMB AND SQUARE. CARPENTER SHALL 3. FRAMING CARPENTRY - ALL WORK SHALL BE RIGIDLY FRAMED AND CLOSELY DIMENSIONS. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMITY WITH SHALL LAY OUT AL CARPENTRY WORK AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL 2. LAYOUT - THE CARPENTER SHALL PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY CARPENTRY LABOR, THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. JOIST AT EXTERIOR FACE OF BLOCK. DIVISION 6 - ROUGH CARPENTRY 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS SECTION 610 - CARPENTRY GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS AND QUALITY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM FOR SECTION ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK INSTITUTE S WOODWORK QUALITY STANDARDS, 1400 PREMIUM GRADE WOOD STILE AND RAIL DOORS. 8. CABINETRY - SHALL BE PREMIUM GRADE AS DEFINED IN THE QUALITY 7. COUNTERTOPS - SHALL BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED AS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 6. SHOP DRAWINGS - SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS, FULL SIZE SAMPLES OF DOORS, STANDARDS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK INDUSTRY AS PUBLISHED BY CONTINUITY SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER IN THE SHOP DRAWINGS. FINAL ADJUSTMENTS FOR CLEARANCES, EDGE CONDITIONS, AND DESIGN DRAWERS AND PANELS, AND FINISH SAMPLES TO DESIGNER FOR APPROVAL. SYSTEMS, OR APPLIANCES; AND MAKE ALLOWANCE FOR EQUIPMENT SIZE AND THE AMERICAN WOODWORK INSTITUTE. WIRING REQUIREMENTS. 5. COORDINATION - CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL 4. INSTALLATION - CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL OR SUPERVISE INSTALLATION 3. FIELD MEASUREMENTS - CABINET MAKER SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS IN BUILT-IN AUDIO VISUAL EQUIPMENT, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL AND PLUMB AND SCRIBED TO ADJACENT WALLS. NO FILLER PANELS OF ALL CABINETRY AND COUNTERTOPS. ALL CABINETRY SHALL BE TRUE THE FIELD PRIOR TO PRODUCTION OF SHOP DRAWINGS, FABRICATION OR ALLOWED. INSTALLATION. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BEFORE TRENCHING 7. FIXTURE SCHEDULE - SEE INT. DESIGN DRAWINGS 6. CLEAN-UP - THE INSTALLER SHALL REMOVE ALL ELECTRICAL SCRAP, WIPE CLEAN AND BROOM CLEAN ALL AREAS OF INSTALLATION. 7. PLUMBING FIXTURE SCHEDULE - BY OWNER, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR OUTLETS, SWITCHES AND ELECTRICAL PANELS HE WILL BE INSTALLING. 3. DRAWINGS - ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL, PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING DONE, PROVIDE DRAWINGS SHOWING LOCATION, TYPE AND CONNECTION OF LIGHTS, 4. WARRANTY - ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANT THAT THE ENTIRE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IS IN PERFECT WORKING ORDER. 5. PERMITS - ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY WORK WITH OTHER TRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF METERS, TESTS, PERMITS, LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS, SHALL COORDINATE ALL AREAS OF CAULKING AND BROOM CLEAN ALL AREAS OF INSTALLATION. COMPLETE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINNESOTA CIRCUIT BREAKERS AND ALL OTHER LABOR AND MATERIAL NECESSARY TO AND TO FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL WIRING RECEPTACLE, SWITCHES, CAPACITY OF SYSTEM TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE FUNCTIONING SYSTEM 2. SCOPE - ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE DRAWINGS AND CALCULATE STATE ELECTRICAL CODE. 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS SECTION 1601 - WIRING DIVISION 16 - ELECTRICAL 6. CLEAN-UP - THE INSTALLER SHALL REMOVE ALL PLUMBING SCRAP, WIPE CLEAN CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BEFORE LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS; SHALL COORDINATE WORK WITH OTHER TRADES. METERS, (INCLUDING GAS PIPING FOR ALL FIREPLACES), TESTS, PERMITS, 5. PERMITS - PLUMBING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY SYSTEM IS FREE OF LEAKS AND ALL FIXTURES ARE IN PERFECT WORKING ORDER. 4. WARRANTY - PLUMBING CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANT THAT THE ENTIRE PLUMBING PROVIDE DRAWINGS SHOWING LOCATION, TYPE OF EQUIPMENT AND CONTROLS 3. DRAWINGS - PLUMBING CONTRACTOR SHALL, PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING DONE, TESTED. PROPOSAL SHALL BE FOR THE COMPLETE SYSTEM. INSTALLED PER STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND ALL CONNECTIONS THOROUGHLY AND PERFORM ALL PLUMBING WORK. ALL PLUMBING SHALL BE PROPERLY DETERMINE WHAT SYSTEMS MUST BE INSTALLED, PROVIDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIAL 2. SCOPE - PLUMBING CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE, REVIEW THE DRAWINGS AND HE WILL BE INSTALLING. TRENCHING. 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS SECTION 1503 - PLUMBING CO. OR EQUAL. COLOR TO BE APPROVED BEFORE INSTALLATION. DIVISION 15 - MECHANICAL SECTION 1080 - BATH ACCESSORIES SECTION 1190 - KITCHEN APPLIANCES 3. INSTALLATION BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR, PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY POWER, 2. MATERIAL - ACCESSORIES SCHEDULE BY OWNER, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. DIVISION 11 - EQUIPMENT CONNECTIONS, AND HOOK-UPS. 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS 2. SCHEDULE EQUIPMENT- BY OWNER 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS SEAL, TWO COATS MOORE REGAL WALL LATEX. PRIME SEAL, 2 COATS MOORE REGAL WALL LATEX. APPLICATION. IF NECESSARY A BRUSH OUT SAMPLE SHALL BE PROVIDED 11. APPROVAL - COLOR SELECTIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO 10. SURFACES - ALL EXPOSED SURFACES SHALL BE PAINTED, STAINED OR SEALED. 9. INTERIOR GYPSUM WALLBOARD - ONE COAT MOORE LATEX QUICK DRY ANY PAINT ON OTHER SURFACES. CUT IN AGAINST ADJACENT MATERIALS, FREE OF BRUSH MARKS. CLEAN OFF 12. APPLICATION - ALL WORK SHALL BE EVENLY AND CAREFULLY APPLIED AND DIVISION 10 - SPECIALTIES FOR OWNER S REVIEW. 13. SCHEDULE - BY OWNER. SECTION 990 - PAINTING AND STAINING 5. SAMPLE - SUBMIT TILE SAMPLE FOR APPROVAL. PAINT, TWO COATS MOORE IMPERVO ENAMEL. METAL PRIMER. TWO COATS MOORE IMPERVO ENAMEL. BENJAMIN MOORE, OR APPROVED EQUAL. 8. INTERIOR PAINTED WOOD - ONE COAT MOORE LATEX QUICK DRY PRIME HOLES WITH MATCHING FILLER. SANDPAPER LIGHTLY BETWEEN COATS. MOORE SANDING SEALER, 2 COATS MOORE URETHANE VARNISH. FILL NAIL 7. INTERIOR WOOD - STAINED ONE COAT MOORE WIPING STAIN, ONE COAT 6. EXTERIOR FERROUS METAL - ONE COAT MOORE RETARDO RUST INHIBITIVE 5. EXTERIOR GALVANIZED METAL - ONE COAT MOORE IRONCLAD GALVANIZED 4. EXTERIOR STAIN - CABOT STAIN - APPROVED BY OWNER. 3. MATERIALS - ALL PAINTING MATERIALS SPECIFIED IN THIS SECTION ARE BY SURFACES TO WHICH PAINTING AND FINISHING MATERIALS ARE APPLIED. APPLICATORS AND TECHNIQUES BEST SUITED FOR THE MATERIAL AND AND APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER S DIRECTIONS. USE 2. INSTALLATION - ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE DELIVERED, STORED, PREPARED FINAL FINISH SMOOTH TO TOUCH. 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS 6. SCHEDULE - BY OWNER. SECTION 933-CERAMIC AND QUARRY TILE 4. GROUT - COLORED HYDROMENT JOINT FILLER MANUFACTURED BY THE UPCO PARALLEL, TO HAVE MINIMUM PRACTICAL AMOUNT OF JOINTS. AMERICAN TILE. IT SHALL BE LAID SQUARE, LEVEL, WITH ALL JOINTS CERAMIC TILE INSTALLATION, PUBLISHED BY THE TILE COUNCIL OF CURED IN ACCORDING WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF HANDBOOK FOR 3. INSTALLATION - TILE SHALL BE INSTALLED, GROUTED, PROTECTED AND 2. TILE - SEE SCHEDULE 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS 8. CASING - SEE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR DETAILS. PROFILE SELECTED BY OWNER. OTHER RECOMMENDED MATERIALS MUST BE APPROVED BY DESIGNER. SECTION 951 - ACOUSTICAL PANEL CEILING 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS 2. QUALITY - ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE U.S. GYPSUM HANDBOOK. 3. CEILING TILE - SEE A120 FOR SPECIFICATION SECTION 928 - GLASS BOARD 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS 2. QUALITY - ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE U.S. GYPSUM HANDBOOK. 3. GLASS BOARD - WHITE W/ WHITE CAULK JOINTS 3. STAINLESS STEEL - WALL, CORNER GUARDS AND COLUMN COVERS AS NOTED. - SUPPLIED BY OWNER, INSTALLED BY GC. 4. PROVIDED BY OWNER, INSTALED BY CONTRACTOR - PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER TOILET PAPER DISPENSER, ... Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:41 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt A8-101 SPECIFICATIONS 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 SS PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS No. Description Date IN ADDITION TO ALL A.D.A./A.D.A.A.G. REQUIREMENTS, THIS FACILITY SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LOCAL JURISDICTION FOR ACCESSIBILITY AS LISTED BELOW. * WHERE INFORMATION LISTED/SHOWN IN THIS SECTION CONFLICTS WITH THE A.D.A.A.G. INTERIOR ACCESSIBILITY COMPONENTS, THE MORE RESTRICTIVE OF THE TWO REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FOLLOWED 1.) THESE PLANS REFLECT INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE FEDERAL AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990, PUBLIC LAW 101-28CFR, PART 36. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL ASPECTS OF THIS LAW IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER. MEETING LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS DOES NOT ASSUME COMPLIANCE. 2.) THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE TO A BUILDING SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE HANDICAPPED. ALL OTHER ENTRANCES TO A BUILDING WHICH ARE LOCATED WITHIN SIX-INCHES OF ADJOINING GROUND ARE ALSO REQUIRED TO BE ACCESSIBLE. ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE SAME NUMBER AS REQUIRED FOR EXITS. AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 812, AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ALL PORTIONS OF A BUILDING. 3.) DOORWAY THRESHOLDS SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN ONE-HALF-INCH ABOVE ADJOINING FLOOR. THE EDGES OF THE THRESHOLD SHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NO GREATER THAN ONE IN TWO, IF THICKER THAN ONE-QUARTER-INCH. 4.) DOOR HARDWARE SHALL BE OPERABLE WITH A SINGLE EFFORT BY LEVER-TYPE HARDWARE, PANIC BARS, PUSH-PULL ACTIVATING BARS, OR OTHER HARDWARE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE PASSAGE WITHOUT REQUIRING THE ABILITY TO GRASP THE OPENING HARDWARE. ACCESSIBLE DOOR HARDWARE SHALL BE MOUNTED BETWEEN THIRTY AND FOURTY-FOUR-INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR. PANIC HARDWARE UNLATCHING FORCE SHALL NOT EXCEED EIGHT AND ONE-HALF POUNDS IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. 5.) THE LOWER TEN-INCHES OF DOORS ARE TO BE A SMOOTH, PLAIN SURFACE (NO RECESS OR TRAP IS ALLOWED, EXCEPT AT SLIDING AND AUTOMATIC DOORS). 6.) ACCESSIBLE BUILDING ENTRANCE ARE TO BE IDENTIFIED BY THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY. THE SYMBOL SHALL BE A W HITE FIGURE ON A BLUE BACKGROUND. 7.) RECESSED DOORWAYS (WHERE PROVIDED) SHALL BE ANCHORED. 8.) ALL FLOOR-LEVEL SIGNS AND MARKERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A MANNER AS TO NOT INTERFERE WITH WHEELCHAIR FOOTRESTS. 9.) A FORTY-EIGHT-INCH LONG CLEAR SPACE IS REQUIRED IN FRONT OF AN ACCESSIBLE WATER CLOSET. A SIXTY-INCH CLEAR SPACE IS REQUIRED FOR THE WIDTH OF AN ACCESSIBLE WATER CLOSET. GRAB BARS MAY ENCROACH NO MORE THAN THREE-INCHES INTO THESE SPACES. 10.) DOORS TO ACCESSIBLE WATER CLOSET STALLS SHALL HAVE AN AUTO-CLOSING DEVICE AND SHALL PROVIDE A THIRTY-TWO-INCH MINIMUM CLEAR WIDTH FOR FRONT ENTRY (THIRTY-FOUR-INCHES CLEAR AT SIDE ENTRIES). 11.) A FORTY-TWO-INCH LONG GRAB BAR AT THE SIDE OF THE WATER CLOSET AND A THIRTY-SIX-INCH LONG GRAB BAR BEHIND THE WATER CLOSET ARE REQUIRED. THE GRAB BARS SHALL BE MOUNTED BETWEEN THIRTY-THREE AND THIRTY-SIX INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR. 12.) GRAB BARS SHALL BE ONE-AND-ONE-HALF-INCHES IN DIAMETER WITH ONE-AND-ONE-HALF-INCHES OF CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE BAR AND WALL. THE GRAB BARS SHALL HAVE ONE-EIGHTH DIAMETER (MINIMUM) RADI ON ALL EDGES AND SHALL BE NON-ABRASIVE. THE GRAB BARS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING UP TO TWO HUNDRED FIFTY POUNDS PER FOOT IN BENDING, SHEAR, OR TENSION. 13.) THE FORCE REQUIRED TO ACTIVATE THE FLUSH VALVE OF A WATER CLOSET OR URINAL SHALL BE FIVE POUNDS (MAXIMUM). WATER CLOSET AND URINAL FLUSH VALVES SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN FORTY-FOUR-INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR. 14.) IF EMERGENCY WARNING SYSTEMS ARE REQUIRED, THEY SHALL ACTIVATE A MEANS OF WARNING FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED. FLASHING VISUAL WARNINGS SHALL HAVE A FREQUENCY OF NOT MORE THAN SIXTY FLASHES PER MINUTE. 15.) APPROVED TACTILE SIGNAGE SHALL BE MOUNTED ADJACENT TO THE LATCH SIDE OF DOORWAYS, SIXTY-INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR, AND SHALL BEAR APPROVED ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOLS AND BRAILLE LETTERING. 16.) ADDITIONAL BARRIER-FREE STANDARDS REQUIREMENTS MAY BE DETAILED ELSEWHERE IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ADDITIONAL ACCESSIBILITY COMPONENTS 1. ALL WALKS, HALLS, CORRIDORS, AISLES, SKYWALKS, TUNNELS, AND OTHER SPACES THAT ARE PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL COMPLY WITH A.D.A.A.G. 2. AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL CONNECT ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES WITH ALL ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND ELEMENTS. 3. AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A RUNNING SLOPE GREATER THAN 1:20 IS A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY WITH 4.8. NOWHERE SHALL THE CROSS SLOPE OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE EXCEED 1:50. PA T H O F T R A V E L MINIMUM CLEAR WIDTH FOR SINGLE WHEELCHAIR 60-IN DIAMETER SPACE T-SHAPED SPACE FOR 180° TURNS CHANGES IN LEVEL MINIMUM CLEAR WIDTH 90° TURN TURN AROUND AN OBSTRUCTION WALKING PARALLEL TO A WALL 1. ELEMENTS OF ACCESSIBLE RESTROOMS SHALL COMPLY WITH A.D.A.A.G. SECTIONS 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 4.18, 4.19, AND 4.22. 2. ACCESSIBLE URINALS SHALL BE STALL-TYPE OR WALL-HUNG WITH AN ELONGATED RIM AT A MAXIMUM OF 17" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR. URINALS SHALL HAVE A 30" X 48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE TO ALLOW A FRONT APPROACH AND THE FLUSH CONTROLS SHALL BE HAND-OPERATED WITH THE CONTROLS INSTALLED NO HIGHER THAN 44" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR. 3. HOT WATER AND DRAIN PIPES UNDER LAVATORIES SHALL BE INSULATED OR OTHERWISE CONFIGURED TO PROTECT AGAINST CONTACT. THERE SHALL BE NO SHARP OR ABRASIVE SURFACES UNDER LAVATORIES. 4. EXAMPLES OF ACCESSIBLE FAUCETS INCLUDE: LEVER-OPERATED, PUSH-TYPE, AND ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED. IF SELF-CLOSING VALVES ARE USED THE FAUCET SHALL REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST 10 SECONDS. 5. THE DIAMETER OR WIDTH OF THE GRIPPING SURFACES OF A GRAB BAR SHALL BE 1-1/4 IN TO 1-1/2 IN, OR THE SHAPE TO PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT GRIPPING SURFACE. THE SPACE BETWEEN THE WALL AND THE GRAB BAR SHALL BE 1-1/2”. THE GRAB BAR ASSEMBLY SHALL BE CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING BENDING STRESSES, SHEAR STRESSES, SHEAR FORCES, AND TENSILE FORCES OF UP TO 250 LBF. GRAB BARS SHALL NOT ROTATE WITHIN THEIR FITTINGS. 6. MOUNTING HEIGHTS TO OPERATING CONTROLS FOR RESTROOM ACCESSORIES NOT SPECIFICALLY CALL OUT IN THE A.D.A.A.G. SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REACH RANGES SPECIFIED IN A.D.A.A.G. SECTION 4.2.5.. RE S T R O O M S BACK WALL SIDE WALL GRAB BARS AT WATER CLOSETS STANDARD STALL STANDARD WALL (END OF ROW) TOILET STALLS FREE-STANDING FOUNTAIN OR COOLER BUILT-IN SOUNTAIN OR COOLER DRINKING FOUNTAINS AND WATER COOLERS CLEAR FLOOR SPACESPOUT HEIGHT AND KNEE CLEARANCES CLEAR FLOOR SPACE AT WATER CLOSETS 1. CONTROLS AND OPERATING MECHANISMS SHALL COMPLY WITH A.D.A.A.G. SECTION 4.27. 2. ALL CONTROLS & OPERATING MECHANISMS WHICH ARE INTENED FOR NORMAL USE BY BUILDING OCCUPANTS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A.D.A.A.G.-COMPLIANT CLEAR FLOOR SPACES & SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN 1" OF THE REQUIRED FORWARD OR SIDE APPROACH REACH RANGES (48" A.F.F. = FORWARD -54" A.F.F. = SIDE APPROACH). CO N T R O L S / O P E R A T I N G ME C H A N I S M S CLEAR FLOOR SPACE -PARALLEL APPROACH HIGH AND LOW SIDE REACH LIMITS SIDE REACH HIGH FORWARD REACH LIMIT FORWARD REACH 1. ACCESSIBLE STAIRS SHALL COMPLY WITH A.D.A.A.G. SECTION 4.9. 2. ACCESSIBLE STAIRS SHALL HAVE UNIFORM RISER HEIGHTS AND UNIFORM TREAD WIDTHS ALONG EACH RUN. 3. THE CLEAR SPACE BETWEEN HANDRAILS AND WALL SHALL BE 1-1/2". GRIPPING SURFACES SHALL BE UNINTERRUPTED BY NEWEL POSTS, OTHER CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, OR OBSTRUCTIONS. TOP OF HANDRAIL GRIPPING SURFACE SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN 34 IN AND 38 IN ABOVE STAIR NOSINGS.ST A I R S NOTE: X IS THE MINIMUM HANDRAIL EXTENSION REQUIRED AT EACH TOP RISER -Y IS THE MINIMUM HANDRAIL EXTENSION OF 12 IN PLUS THE WIDTH OF ONE TREAD THAT IS REQUIRED AT EACH BOTTOM RISER PLAN ELEVATION OF CENTER HANDRAIL EXTENSION AT BOTTOM OF RUN EXTENSION AT TOP OF RUN 1. ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH A.D.A.A.G. SECTION 4.30. 2. LETTERS AND NUMBERS ON SIGNS SHALL HAVE A WIDTH-TO-HEIGHT RATIO BETWEEN 3:5 AND 1:1 AND A STROKE-WIDTH-TO-HEIGHT RATIO BETWEEN 1:5 AND 1:10. 3. CHARACTERS AND NUMBERS ON SIGNS SHALL BE SIZED ACCORDING TO THE VIEWING DISTANCE FROM WHICH THEY ARE TO BE READ. THE MINIMUM HEIGHT IS MEASURED USING AN UPPER CASE X. LOWER CASE CHARACTERS ARE PERMITTED. SIGNS INSTALLED OVER 80" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CHARACTER HEIGHT OF 3". 4. LETTERS AND NUMERALS SHALL BE RAISED 1/32”MINIMUM, UPPER CASE, SANS SERIF OR SIMPLE SERIF TYPE AND SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED WITH GRADE 2 BRAILLE. RAISED CHARACTERS SHALL BE AT LEAST 5/8”HIGH, BUT NO HIGHER THAN 2”. PICTOGRAMS SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE EQUIVALENT VERBAL DESCRIPTION PLACED DIRECTLY BELOW THE PICTOGRAM. THE BORDER DIMENSION OF THE PICTOGRAM SHALL BE 6”MINIMUM IN HEIGHT. 5. THE CHARACTERS AND BACKGROUND OF SIGNS SHALL BE EGGSHELL, MATTE, OR OTHER NON-GLARE FINISH. CHARACTERS AND SYMBOLS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND --EITHER LIGHT CHARACTERS ON A DARK BACKGROUND OR DARK CHARACTERS ON A LIGHT BACKGROUND. 6. WHERE PERMANENT IDENTIFICATION IS PROVIDED FOR ROOMS AND SPACES, SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE WALL ADJACENT TO THE LATCH SIDE OF THE DOOR, INCLUDING AT DOUBLE-LEAF DOORS. SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE NEAREST ADJACENT WALL. MOUNTING HEIGHT SHALL BE 60” ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE SIGN. MOUNTING LOCATION FOR SUCH SIGNAGE SHALL BE SO THAT A PERSON MAY APPROACH WITHIN 3”OF SIGNAGE WITHOUT ENCOUNTERING PROTRUDING OBJECTS OR STANDING WITHIN THE SWING OF A DOOR. SI G N A G E INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITYDISPLAY CONDITIONS -INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY 1. ACCESSIBLE DOORS SHALL COMPLY WITH A.D.A.A.G. SECTION 4.13. 2. THRESHOLD AT DOORWAYS SHALL NOT EXCEED 3/4" IN HEIGHT FOR EXTERIOR SLIDING DOORS OR 1/2" IN HEIGHT FOR OTHER TYPES OF DOORS. RAISED THRESHOLDS AND FLOOR LEVEL CHANGES AT DOORWAYS SHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 1:2. 3. HANDLES, PULLS, LATCHES, LOCKS, AND OTHER OPERATING DEVICES ON ACCESSIBLE DOORS SHALL HAVE A SHAPE THAT IS EASY TO GRASP WITH ONE HAND AND DOES NOT REQUIRE TIGHT GRASPING, TIGHT PINCHING, OR TWISTING OF THE WRIST TO OPERATE. LEVER-OPERATED MECHANISMS, PUSH-TYPE MECHANISMS, AND U-SHAPED HANDLES ARE ACCEPTABLE DESIGNS. HARDWARE REQUIRED FOR ACCESSIBLE DOOR PASSAGE SHALL BE MOUNTED NO HIGHER THAN 48" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. 4. IF A DOOR HAS A CLOSER, THEN THE SWEEP PERIOD OF THE CLOSER SHALL BE ADJUSTED SO THAT FROM A OPEN POSITION OF 70°, THE DOOR WILL TAKE AT LEAST 3 SECONDS TO MOVE TO A POINT 3" FROM THE LATCH, MEASURED TO THE LEADING EDGE OF THE DOOR. 5. ACCESSIBLE DOORS THAT ARE NOT FIRE DOORS OR EXTERIOR HINGED DOORS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM FORCE FOR PUSHING OR PULLING THE DOOR OPEN OF 5 LBF. THIS FORCE DOES NOT APPLY TO THE FORCE REQUIRED TO RETRACT LATCH BOLTS OR DISENGAGE OTHER DEVICES THAT MAY HOLD THE DOOR IN A CLOSED POSITION. DO O R S CLEAR DOORWAY WIDTH FRONT APPROACHES -SWINGING DOORS HINGE SIDE APPROACHES -SWINGING DOORS LATCH SIDE APPROACHES -SWINGING DOORS TWO DOORS HINGED IN SERIES THIS STRUCTURE IS REQUIRED TO BE ACCESSIBLE AS SET FORTH IN THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1994. MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACT AND ITS ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES (A.D.A.), (A.D.A.A.G.). Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:42 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt A8-102 ADAAG 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 PRS JM 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS No. Description Date Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:44 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt A9-101 3D VIEWS 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 SS PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS A9-101 1 3D VIEW 1 A9-101 2 3D VIEW 2 No. Description Date Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:46 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt A9-102 3D VIEWS 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 SS PRS 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS A9-102 1 3D VIEW 3 A9-102 2 3D VIEW 4 No. Description Date 0 1 3 6 10' 3m1 20 SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" Q.T. Wine Racks to Ceiling Ice Machine Wine Cooler Bottled Beer Cooler Keg Cooler Blender Hand Sink 4-Comp Sink Tell Tale Drain P.O.S. System on Bar Cock t a i l St a t i o n Cocktai l Station P.O.S. System on Bar Liquor Shelf Liquor Shelf Cocktail Station Cocktail Station Glassware Glassware Glassware Glassware Cocktail Station Speed Rail Hand S 2-Keg Beer Tap Cooler Bottled Beer Cooler P.O.S. System Wine Cooler Liquor Shelves Above Bar Top 42" High 1'-9" 4'-6" 12'-6" 17'-0" PATIO SERVICE BAR Liquor Shelves Wine Racks Glassware Cocktail Station Hand S 1'-9" Bar Top 42" High MEZZANINE SERVICE BAR STAIR TO RESTROOMS 12'-0" 2'-0"4'-2" P.O.S. System on Bar on Bar P.O.S. System P.O.S. System on Bar 3'-6" 2'-0" 3'-0" 5'-3" 5'-3" 5'-0" 1'-6" Bottle Refr Beer Tap PRELIMINARY PLAN ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 3 CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: 8/17/2023 1:30:47 PM C:\Users\pixox\OneDrive - Rays Designs\Shared PUBLIC\Projects\Project_2023\23710 - RSD - 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn center, MN 55430_Simone\05 - Revit\5927 John Martin Dr - CD -Revision 2_ 08-14-2023.rvt E1-100 EQUIPMENT PLAN 23710 REMODEL JAMBO AFRICA RESTAURANT & BAR 08-17-2023 PRS JM 5927 John Martin Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS E1-100 1 EQUIPMENT PLAN No. Description Date U7 □== C N 0 Catalog Number Notes Type CONTRACTOR SELECT T WR LED ALO SWW Page 1 of 3 TWR LED LED Wall Pack Adjustable+Switchable+Photocell The Lithonia Lighting® TWR wall packs combine the power of the latest generation of LEDs in a popular and classic day-form to provide exceptional energy savings. These wall packs give ultimate versatility to both the distributor and contractor by offering 18 configurations in one product with their standard Adjustable Lumen Output (ALO), Switchable color temperature (SWW2), and adjustable photocell (PE) features. FEATURES: ¡Two sizes deliver from 2,300 lumens up to 16,100 lumens, replacing 70W to 400W HID luminaires ¡Energy savings of up to 86% when replacing HID wall packs with less than two year paybacks ¡Three power levels of adjustable lumen output. Switchable CCT(3000K/4000K/5000K) offers warm, cool and daylight in a single fixture ¡Standard photocell can be turned on or off ¡IP65 rated, Die-cast aluminum housing and borosilicate glass lens ¡Up to 155 LPW Contractor Select™ Catalog Number Adjustable Lumen Output ALO Switchable CCT SWW2 Dusk-to-Dawn Operation PE Input Voltage CRI TWR1 LED ALO SWW2 UVOLT PE DDBTXD 2,300 Lumens 5,300 Lumens 8,500 Lumens*Switchable 3000K, 4000K*, 5000K Included Standard, Selectable On*/Off 120-347V 80CRI TWR2 LED ALO SWW2 UVOLT PE DDBTXD 8,200 Lumens 12,100 Lumens 16,100 Lumens* * - Default out of the box settings Adjustable Lumen Output ALO Dusk-to-Dawn Operation PE Switchable CCT SWW2 TWR LED Stock Configuations Catalog Number UPC Ci Code Number of fixtures per pallet Traditional Replacement TWR1 LED ALO SWW2 UVOLT PE DDBTXD 00196183389947 *280GWW 50 70W - 250W HID TWR2 LED ALO SWW2 UVOLT PE DDBTXD 00196183390028 *280GX5 40 250W - 400W HID Ci Code Input Voltage Catalog Number UPC Number of fixtures per pallet Traditional Replacement *280GX1 120-277V TWR1 LED ALO SWW2 MVOLT PE E7WC DDBTXD 00196183389954 60 70W - 250W HID *2822T3 480V TWR2 LED ALO SWW2 480 DDBTXD 00196183765819 32 250W - 400W HID * Note: Made to order options are available with normal lead time Made To Order Options One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2023 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Rev. 08/10/23 RAD1 LED Radean Arm MountLED Area Luminaire Specifications Catalog Number Notes Type Introduction The RADEAN arm mount luminaire is the perfect choice for pedestrian applications where daytime aesthetics and visual comfort are needed. Adding architectural flair to any space, the RADEAN’s low-profile shape and smooth curves blend in while adding a touch of elegance. Perfect for campuses, parks, pedestrian malls, courtyards and pathways, the RADEAN arm mount is the Architect’s choice to provide beautiful aesthetics both day and night. Hit the Tab key or mouse over the page to see all interactive elements. L1 3.7”H L2 W RAD1 LED Series Performance package Color temperature Distribution Voltage Mounting RAD1 LED P1 3,000 Lumens P2 5,000 Lumens P3 7,000 Lumens P4 11,000 Lumens P5 16,000 Lumens 27K 2700K 30K 3000K 35K 3500K 40K 4000K 50K 5000K SYM Symmetric type V ASY Asymmetric type IV PATH Pathway type III MVOLT 2 120 2 208 2 240 2 277 2 347 480 SPA Square pole mounting (includes adapter) RPA Round pole mounting WBA Wall bracket Control options Other options Finish (required) Shipped installed NLTAIR2 nLight AIR 2.0 enabled 3 PE Button photocell 3 FAO Field adjustable output 3 SF Single Fuse 2 DF Double Fuse 2 L90 Left rotated optics R90 Right rotated optics Shipped separately HS Houseside shield 4 DDBXD Dark bronze DBLXD Black DNAXD Natural aluminum DWHXD White DDBTXD Textured dark bronze DBLBXD Textured black DNATXD Textured natural aluminum DWHGXD Textured white Ordering Information EXAMPLE: RAD1 LED P3 30K SYM MVOLT RPA PE DNAXD EPA:0.75 ft2 (0.05 m2) Length: L1 24” (61cm) L2 30” (60.96 cm) Width:24” (61cm) Height:4” (10.2cm) Weight (max): 29lbs (13.15Kg) NOTES 1 2700K and 3500K may require extended lead-times. 2 MVOLT driver operates on any line voltage from 120-277V (50/60 Hz). Single fuse (SF) requires 120, 277 or 347 voltage option. Double fuse (DF) requires 208, 240 or 480 voltage option. 3 NLTAIR2 not available with PE or FAO. Must link to external nLight Air network. Does not include occupancy sensor. For more information refer to rSBOR pole mount sensor. 4 Also available as a separate accessory; see Accessories information. Shield is field rotatable in 45º increments. Accessories Ordered and shipped separately. RADHS Houseside shield (shield is white) RADCS Decorative clamshell base for 4” RSS pole (specify finish) RADFBC Full base cover for 4” RSS pole (specify finish) For more control options, visit DTL and ROAM online. One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2023 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Rev. 08/24/23 RADPT LED Radean Post TopLED Area Luminaire Specifications Catalog Number Notes Type Introduction The architecturally-inspired shape of the RADEAN™ post top area luminaire embodies the grace and strength of the RADEAN family. The twin copper-core cast aluminum arms support the slender superstructure, creating a beautiful sculpture by day transforming into a beacon of comfort by night. Triangular arms redirect reflection maintaining its visually quiet appearance. With sleek lines and simple silhouettes, these LED luminaires use specialized lighting and visual comfort to transform common areas like courtyards, outdoor retail locations, universities and corporate campuses into pedestrian-friendly nighttime environments. EPA:1.02 ft2 (0.105 m2) Length:24” (61cm) Width:24” (61cm) H1 Luminaire Height: 4” (10.16cm) H2 Luminaire Height: 26” (66.04cm) Weight:38lbs (17.24Kg) Hit the Tab key or mouse over the page to see all interactive elements. W H2 4” L H1 RADPT LED Series Performance package Color temperature Distribution Voltage Mounting (required) RADPT LED P1 3,000 Lumens P2 5,000 Lumens P3 7,000 Lumens P4 10,000 Lumens P5 15,000 Lumens 27K 2700K 30K 3000K 35K 3500K 40K 4000K 50K 5000K SYM Symmetric type V ASY Asymmetric type IV PATH Pathway Type III MVOLT 2 120 2 208 2 240 2 277 2 347 480 PT4 3 Slips inside a 4” OD round metal pole RADPT20 Slips over a 2 3/8” diameter tenon (4” tall tenon required) RADPT25 Slips over a 2 7/8” diameter tenon (4” tall tenon required) Control options Other options Finish (required) Shipped installed NLTAIR2 nLight AIR 2.0 enabled 4 PE Button photocell 4 FAO Field adjustable output 4 SF Single Fuse 2 DF Double Fuse 2 R90 Rotated optics 5 Shipped installed HS Houseside shield 6 DDBXD Dark bronze DBLXD Black DNAXD Natural aluminum DWHXD White DDBTXD Textured dark bronze DBLBXD Textured black DNATXD Textured natural aluminum DWHGXD Textured white Ordering Information EXAMPLE: RADPT LED P3 30K SYM MVOLT PT4 PE DNAXD H2 City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3300 | www.brooklyncentermn.gov September 9, 2023 AWC Holdings LLC Attn: Adrian Virges, Jr 4416 78th Avenue North Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 Dear Applicant: The City of Brooklyn Center has conducted an initial review of Planning Commission Application No. 2023- 006, which requests approval of a (1) site and building plan and (2) conditional use permit to convert the existing New King Buffet and former Tires Plus located at 5927 John Martin Drive into an approximately 10,200-square foot restaurant and bar (nightclub) with approximately 1,200-square foot outdoor patio. Although the application submittal is considered complete, it has been determined that in order to proceed, a parking variance is required as the submitted application and intended use, as proposed, demonstrates deficiencies in providing minimum on-site parking as calculated under Section 35-5506 (Required Parking Spaces) of the City Code. As this is a separate application request and as a public hearing notice has already been published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post for the aforementioned site and building plan and conditional use permit requests, the following is requested of the Applicant by no later than Wednesday, September 13, 2023 in order to allow adequate time to submit a separate public hearing notice for the variance request: 1.Nonrefundable Application Fee of $200 for the Variance Request (a separate escrow is not required at this time as the initial $1,000 escrow was submitted to the City) 2.Responses to the Variance Criteria below, as outlined under Section 35-7103 of the City Code and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.357, subdivision 6, as the City Council may only grant approval of variances where practical difficulties exist as to strict compliance of the City’s Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and where each of the following criteria are satisfied: a)The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this UDO; b)The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; c)The property owner proposed to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this UDO; d)The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and not created by the landowner; and e)The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. It should be noted that economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Based upon this information, and considering a public hearing has been published for the site and building plan and conditional use permit requests, the City’s Planning Commission still intends to convene on Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Brooklyn Center City Hall, located at Exhibit C City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3300 | www.brooklyncentermn.gov 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430. At this time, we respectively request you indicate your intent to apply for a variance by no later than Wednesday, September 13, 2023, and further request your presence at the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for Thursday, September 14, 2023. Should you proceed with the variance request and provide all necessary information and fees by September 13, 2023, the anticipated timeline for consideration of your application is as follows: Thursday, September 14, 2023 (7 p.m.) | Planning Commission – Hold public hearing and request to continue the public hearing for the site and building plan and conditional use permit for 5927 John Martin Drive as provided under Planning Commission Application No. 2023-006 to Thursday, October 12, 2023. Thursday, October 12, 2023 (7 p.m.) | Planning Commission – Hold the continued public hearing for Planning Commission Application No. 2023-006 for consideration of the following amended requests: (1) site and building plan, (2) conditional use permit, and (3) variance. Monday, October 23, 2023 (7 p.m.) | City Council – Final review and consideration of Planning Commission Application No. 2023-006 for 5927 John Martin Drive. Should you choose to not proceed with the variance request, the Planning Commission may elect to recommend denial of Planning Commission Application No. 2023-006, which would then be considered by the City Council on Monday, September 25, 2023 at 7 p.m. With that said, and following an initial review, we are requesting the following additional information be provided in order to allow for a proper review of the application and applicable criteria as outlined under the respective conditional use permit and variance requests: 1.The proposed approximately 1,200-square foot outdoor patio will extend into the existing drive aisle that is shared with neighboring 5939 John Martin Drive. In consideration of the proposed patio, City staff has concerns regarding minimum fire access through this area and around the building, overall circulation on the Subject Property, safe exiting from the patio area given the locations of the proposed gates, and any mitigative measures considered to minimize negative impacts to the adjacent property, as outlined under Section 35-7703 (Conditional Use Permit Criteria). 2.Revision of the submitted photometric plan to meet City Code requirements outlined under Section 35-5400 (Exterior Lighting), which shall clearly demonstrate consistent levels of illumination across the existing open-air parking lot and avoid pockets of very high or low levels of illumination. Spot illuminations shall be provided to clearly demonstrate adherence to minimum and maximum illumination levels, as well as uniformity, and a fixture schedule provided. As previously indicated, the existing pole and wall lighting is non-conforming. Detail sheets shall be provided clearly demonstrating enhanced illumination over all primary building entrances/exits and any pedestrian path ways as outlined under Section 35-5401.m.2 (Lighting Standards) of the City Code. 3.The submitted landscape plan shall be revised to provide an inventory of all existing plantings and species/types. The last revised landscape plan on file and dated November 14, 1991 indicated a minimum required 108 landscape points, which shall be satisfied by the Applicant. 4.Revise proposed architectural plans to clearly identify proposed areas of change and a percentage City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3300 | www.brooklyncentermn.gov breakdown of materials on an elevation-by-elevation basis. Provide additional west elevation rendering denoting the anticipated changes to the existing garage bay doors, as the proposed outdoor patio wall (fencing) makes it difficult to review. As our Assistant City Engineer, James Soltis, recently completed his initial review of the plan sets, I am also including a copy of his review memorandum, dated September 5, 2023. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Brooklyn Center is required to approve or deny a written request for certain land use actions within sixty (60) days from receipt of an application. Community Development Department records indicate the City received the above-referenced application and documentation on August 23, 2023, which means the City’s 60-day time limit would expire on October 22, 2023. Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, subdivision 3.f, affords certain allowances to the City of Brooklyn Center to extend the review period by an additional sixty (60) days to allow the time necessary for City staff to process and review any fees and materials relating to the requested variance, including proposed conditions of approval, which would be reviewed for final action by City Council. This would ultimately extend the deadline for completing the review and final action on this application to December 21, 2023. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reach out to me at (765) 569-3319 or via email at: gmcintosh@brooklyncentermn.gov. Sincerely, Ginny McIntosh City Planner | Zoning Administrator City of Brooklyn Center Enclosure: Review Memorandum, prepared by James Soltis, Assistant City Engineer, and dated September 5, 2023. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: September 5, 2023 October 5, 2023 TO: Ginny McIntosh, City Planner/Zoning Administrator FROM: James Soltis, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Public Works – PUD / Site Plan 5927 John Martin Dr Jambo Africa Restaurant Public Works staff reviewed the following documents submitted for review for the proposed 5927 John Martin Dr redevelopment also known as Jambo Africa Restaurant. 5927 John Martin Dr Narrative (Not dated) Plans (08-17-2023 Construction Documents) Photometric Plan (Not dated) Plans (09-13-2023 Construction Documents) Site Plan Response (Not dated) Photometric Plan (Not dated) Subject to final staff approval, the referenced plans must be revised in accordance with the following comments/revisions and approved prior to issuance of any permits. In the response memo provided by the applicant on 9/27/23 it was indicated that there will be no removal of pavement on the site. This memo has been updated based of this clarification of work and newly provided documents. Plan Items: A1-100 – Site Plan 1.Indicate the disturbed area due to patio and other site disturbances. Square footage over 10,000 sf will trigger a city land disturbance permit and additional site review requirements. 2.Site plan indicates a change in locations of accessible parking spaces from the previous use. Provide documentation the proposed locations meet MN Accessibility Code requirements. 3.The number of provided accessible parking spaces does not meet MN Accessibility Code for minimum number of accessible spaces. Indicate additional locations to meet this minimum number including documentation these locations meet applicable code requirements. Minimum accessible parking spaces can be found under the MN Accessibility Code Table 1106.1 Accessible Parking Spaces which can be found online at https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/MNAC2020P1/2020-minnesota-accessibility-code-2 4.Proposed patio extends into the drive aisle along the North West side of building. Verify reduced drive width meets city minimum requirements for a two way drive as indicated in Section 35- 5504. PARKING SPACE STANDARDS. You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Exhibit D 5.Provide details of any alteration to the drainage patterns along the North Western drive regarding any patio work. 6.Provide a description of the work related to the patio including any removal of pavement or adjustment to grades. Provide documentation the proposed patio meets MN Accessibility Code requirements. 7.Provide a description of any safety considerations for the patio in regard to the adjacent drive. General Items: 8.From Section 35-320: Required Documents, the following are required as part of this submittal. A survey drawing by a registered engineer or land surveyor showing pertinent existing conditions, accurately dimensioned. All aforementioned items, comments and recommendations are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. The site plan must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the referenced plans, unless modified by the staff recommended conditions above. Subsequent approval of the final plan may require additional modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of the final grading, geometric design and other design elements as established by the City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3300 | www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org Community Development 763-569-3330 October 2, 2023 Jambo Africa Restaurant & Bar Building review comments for newly proposed Jambo Africa Restaurant & Bar to be located at 5927 John Martin Dr. 1.Prior to a Building permit being issued. A SAC determination for the new building will need to be done by MET Council and SAC determination letter received. 2.Separate permits and signed plans required for Building, Mechanical, Plumbing & Electrical. A Fire sprinkler and Fire alarm permit with plans is required to be submitted to the Building Department for this building review. The Community Development Department must be contacted on all proposed signage for this building. Permits are required for all exterior signage. 3.The building will be required to have a sprinkler system installed if not already installed. City of Brooklyn Center Ordinance 3-101 B. (2) as adopted by the Minnesota State Building Code 1306 Special Fire Protection system 1306.0020 Subp. 2, Existing and New buildings. 4.Hennepin County Health Department shall approve the restaurant plans prior to any City permits being issued. 5.All plumbing plans shall be reviewed by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry Plumbing Department. All submitted documents shall be signed as required by Minnesota state statues. 6.Any flammable interceptors shall be properly abandoned per MPCA and city requirements. If a grease interceptor is not already installed. A grease interceptor will be required to prevent any future blocking of City Sanitary lines. 7.Building plans to be submitted to the City Building Department for review. If any items need to be addressed, comments will be provided in a plan review letter addressed to the architect of record. Exhibit E City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3300 | www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org 8)Patio doors shall swing in the direction of travel and not into drive areas per MNBC 1010.1.2.1. Gates shall be provided with push hardware or similar hardware to panic or fire exit hardware per MNBC 1010.1.10. Sincerely, Dan Grinsteinner Building Official City of Brooklyn Center 763-569-3313 C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:11/13/2023 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :N/A BY:J esse A nders on, C ommunity D evelopment D irector S U B J E C T:Res olu-on D eclaring November 25, 2023, as S mall Bus iness S aturday in the City of Brooklyn C enter Requested Council A con: - Moon to approve a resoluon declaring November 25, 2023, as S mall Business S aturday in Brookly n C enter. B ackground: The C ity of Brooklyn C enter par-cipates w ith H ennepin C ounty to support local busines s es through their Elevate H ennepin program. Elevate H ennepin draws together experts , tools and programs inten-onally des igned to help new and establis hed busines s es gain their foo-ng, plan for their next steps , and take their s uccess to a new level. Through Elevate H ennepin, H ennepin C ounty is inves-ng in a bus iness support ecosys tem that is s haping the region to become even s tronger and resilient. Hennepin C ounty offers an E levate Hennepin resource hub, accessed technical assistance, or par-cipated in a cohort-learning program. This year Elevate H ennepin will be promo-ng a L ove Local Marke-ng Campaign in advance of S mall Busines s S aturday. The program w ill offer L ove Local W indow Clings for local s mall bus inesses . The C ity will distribute the w indow clings and promote local bus inesses by pos-ng on social media, s haring informa-on informa-on in our new s le8er, and promo-ng through other local communica-ons outlets. B udget I ssues: I nclusive C ommunity Engagement: A nracist/Equity Policy Effect: S trategic Priories and Values: Resident Economic S tability AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip-on U pload D ate Type Res olu-on 11/3/2023 Resolu-on Le8er L ove Local Toolkit 11/3/2023 Backup M aterial Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING NOVEMBER 25, 2023 AS SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, Hennepin County and Brooklyn Center celebrates our local small businesses and the contributions they make to the local economy and community; according to the United States Census, there are more than 38,000 small businesses with fewer than 100 employees in Hennepin County, representing over 96 percent of businesses in the county; and WHEREAS, the Small Business Administration as well as advocacy groups and other public and private organizations across the country have endorsed the Saturday after Thanksgiving as Small Business Saturday; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has partnered with Brooklyn Center, several cities in the county and the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority to support Small Business Saturday with the multijurisdictional Love Local campaign which encourages residents to support local, independently owned businesses that create jobs, boost the local economy, and make our communities vibrant and livable; and WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities including their planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance are vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill of Public Works personnel. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, does hereby proclaim November 25, 2023, Small Business Saturday and urges those who live and work in our communities to support small businesses and merchants on Small Business Saturday and throughout the year. November 13, 2023 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 Love Local marketing toolkit for city partners We are excited for the enthusiasm you’ve shown for reviving the Love Local small business marketing campaign in advance of Small Business Saturday. Love Local is an ongoing initiative from Hennepin County to highlight the vibrant small business community that makes our county so great. We plan to feature Love Local on Hennepin County and Elevate HennepinSM communications channels and will be promoting the opportunity for business owners to get their own Love Local window cling. Please join us in promoting local businesses by posting on social media, sharing information in your newsletters, and promoting through your local communications outlets. Please feel free to use and tailor the sample copy and creative collateral included in this document for your unique audiences. For Love Local program questions contact brandon.bell@hennepin.us. And don’t forget to share your images with Hennepin County, please tag us in posts or send us photos of your Love Local activities directly. 2 Contents Love Local marketing toolkit for city partners ...................................................................................... 1 Images and pictures ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Window clings ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Sample website content ............................................................................................................................... 4 Newsletter/email content ............................................................................................................................ 5 Social media example posts ....................................................................................................................... 7 3 Images and pictures You can download Love Local images for use on web, print, newsletter, and social media platforms through Dropbox here. Window clings Hennepin County has designed window clings for small businesses to display and demonstrate they are a local business and an important part of our community. Clings are being distributed in several ways: 1) If you would like to customize this cling to add your city logo, you can access the modifiable Adobe Illustrator files, here (must have Adobe software to modify). We encourage you to work with a local printer in your community to print these to either have available for pickup at your city hall or other convenient location, or to distribute to businesses directly. 2) Hennepin County will also be printing a limited number of clings without specific city branding. Please email Brandon at Brandon.Bell@hennepin.us by November 8th if you would like up to 50 of these standard clings delivered to your city hall prior to Small Business Saturday. 4 Sample website content The Love Local campaign is an effort to encourage residents to shop locally and keep this a vibrant, small-business friendly community. That’s why [city name] has partnered with Hennepin County’s Elevate HennepinSM initiative to launch the multijurisdictional Love Local campaign, which encourages residents to support local businesses that create jobs, boost the local economy, and enrich our communities. [Option – for cities that have window clings on-hand] We encourage business owners to stop by city hall to pick up a Love Local window cling to show your community pride. Get in touch with [email contact] to get yours today! 5 Newsletter/email content For a general audience These messages are tailored for a general resident/public audience. Option 1 – before Small Business Saturday November 25 We ‘Love Local’ businesses Small Business Saturday is November 25, and it’s the perfect time to shop at the local businesses that are an essential part of this community. [your city] has partnered with Hennepin County’s Elevate HennepinSM initiative in a promotional effort called Love Local to highlight our love for local businesses. Look out for Love Local signs in the windows of your favorite local restaurants and retailers and be sure to shop local and show our businesses lots of love this holiday season. [insert window cling image] Option 2 – throughout holiday season Shop local this holiday season The holiday shopping and entertaining season is here! It’s the busiest time of year for the many local retailers and venues that we love in our community. We’ve partnered with Hennepin County’s Elevate HennepinSM initiative to help promote shopping local this holiday season through the ‘Love Local’ campaign. As you’re out and about, look for Love Local signs at local businesses. These are the businesses that sponsor our local sports teams, employ your neighbors, and make this community so vibrant and unique. [insert window cling image] 6 For a business audience These messages are tailored for a business audience if your city communicates with local business owners directly. Option 1 – before Small Business Saturday November 25 Remind customers you’re part of the community this Small Business Saturday Small Business Saturday is November 25, and it’s a perfect time to remind shoppers that your business is an integral part of this community. [your city] is partnering with Hennepin County’s Elevate HennepinSM initiative in a promotional effort called Love Local to encourage residents to shop locally and keep this a vibrant, small business friendly community. We encourage you to pick up a Love Local window cling to show your local pride. [Insert best way for businesses in your community to get a cling - see ‘window clings’ section above] [insert window cling image] Option 2 – throughout holiday season Remind shoppers you’re local this holiday season The holiday shopping season is here! It’s the busiest time of year for many local retailers and shoppers are in a buying mood. Remind them how important you are to the community. [your city] has partnered with Hennepin County in the Love Local to encourage community members to shop local this season. We encourage you to pick up a Love Local window cling to show your local pride. [Insert best way for businesses in your community to get a cling - see ‘window clings’ section above] 7 Social media example posts The following posts can be shared throughout the month and can be re-worded to fit the needs of your audience. More images can be found below or can be downloaded here: Web and Social Media Imagery Tag county and Elevate Hennepin℠ profiles As you are posting, please consider tagging the following Hennepin County and Elevate Hennepin℠ profiles and use the hashtag #LoveLocalHC. Hennepin County: Hennepin County | Facebook Hennepin County | Twitter Hennepin County | Instagram Hennepin County | LinkedIn Elevate Hennepin℠: Elevate HennepinSM MSP | Facebook Elevate HennepinSM | Instagram Elevate HennepinSM | LinkedIn For posting ahead of November 25 November 25 is #SmallBusinessSaturday. Remember to shop small this Saturday and year-round. Small businesses are essential for creating vibrant, unique, inclusive places 8 to live. Thank you to our small business neighbors and their contributions to our economy and communities! For Posting on November 25: Happy #SmallBusinessSaturday! Friendly reminder to support your local small businesses today and year-round. #LoveLocalHC Celebrate #SmallBusinessSaturday by supporting our local business districts today! Shop, eat, and enjoy your local small businesses that make [your city] so exceptional. #LoveLocalHC #ShopSmall 9 For posting anytime in the holiday shopping season: Small businesses are the backbone of our economy and the heart of our community. They help create two out of every three new jobs and reflect our growing diversity. Be sure to support local businesses for your holiday shopping, dining, and entertainment! #LoveLocalHC Looking for something unique, something personal? Visit your local small businesses this holiday shopping season! (And don’t forget to grab some great food too.) #LoveLocalHC C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:11/13/2023 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :Elizabeth H eyman, P ublic Works D irector BY:Lydia Ener, P.E., P rincipal Engineer S U B J E C T:Res olu2on Establis hing 2024 S treet and S torm D rainage S pecial A sses s ment Rates Requested Council A con: - M oon to approve a resoluon establishing the 2 0 2 4 str eet and stor m drainage special assessment rates for street and ulity improvement projects. B ackground: Each year the City C ouncil es tablishes as s essment rates for R1, R2, and R3 res iden2al z oned proper2es based on the C ity ’s S pecial A s s es s ment Policy. W ithin thes e z oning dis tricts, the asses s ment rate for s treet and storm drainage improvements is based on a unit amount that applies to all single-family res iden2al proper2es. T he unit amount r epr es ents a specific por2 on of the average cost for r econs tr uc2ng a typical res iden2al street and s torm drainage s y s tem. S treet as s es s ments for non-residen2al and R4 to R7 res iden2al proper2es are computed separately for each project. S pecial as s essment rates are typically adj us ted each year to reflect normal infla2onary increas es in cons truc2on costs. The City ’s S pecial A s s es s ment Policy indicates that “the unit asses s ment s hall be adjus ted annually to reflect cos t of liv ing incr eas es as measured by the C ons truc2 on I ndex” (C ity Council Code of Policies S ec2on I I – 2.10.2.B.1.a.2). The Engineering New s Record (E N R) C ons truc2on C os t I ndex has experienced an average annual percent change for 2023 of 1.2 percent, as shown in the table below. Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2 0 2 2 2023* 12-mo avg. annual % change 1.4 3.5 5.3 0.9 1.0 4.6 3.1 1.2 S ource: E N R w ebsite, Note: * 12-month average November 2022 – O ctober 2023 Bas ed on the 2 0 2 3 informa2 on above, staff recommends adjus 2 ng the s pecial as s essment rates by an increase of 1 .2 per cent for 2024, w hich will be an increas e of $79 from the 2023 total as s es s ment amount for full street and storm r econs tr uc2on pr ojects . This rate should con2 nue to maintain the por 2on of s treet and s tor m drainage cos ts that ar e as s es s ed at approximately 33 percent of the total cos t for s treet and s torm drainage improv ements . The City C ouncil has his torically tar geted 33 percent as the por2on of s treet and storm drainage improvements that are asses s ed to adjoining R1, R2, and R3 res iden2al proper2es . B udget I ssues: The table below shows the propos ed 2024 s pecial asses s ment rates for R 1 s ingle-family res iden2 al lots. The aLached res olu2on provides the corresponding adjustments for R2 and R3 z oned proper2es based on the proposed unit asses s ment rates. P roject Type 2 0 2 4 S treet I mprovements R1 A sses s ment Rates 2024 S torm D rainage I mprovements R1 A sses s ment Rates F ull S treet Reconstruc2on $5 ,138 $1 ,541 Par2al S treet Reconstruc2on (full pavement replacement)$3 ,852 N A Pavement Rehabilita2on (mill and overlay)$1 ,698 N A I nclusive C ommunity Engagement: N A A nracist/Equity Policy Effect: N A S trategic Priories and Values: Key Transporta2on I nvestments AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip2on U pload D ate Type Res olu2on 11/6/2023 Resolu2on LeLer Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO._______________ RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2024 STREET AND STORM DRAINAGE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RATES WHEREAS, the residential assessment rates for street and storm drainage improvements are annually reviewed and approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the residential assessment rates should be adjusted annually to be effective January 1; and WHEREAS, the 2024 street and storm drainage assessment rates for R1, R2 and R3 zoned districts are based on a specific proportion of approximately 33 percent of the average cost for street and storm drainage improvements; and WHEREAS, the R4, R5, R6 and R7 zoned districts will continue to be assessed based on an evaluation of project cost and project benefit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The residential street and storm drainage special assessment rates for street reconstruction and pavement rehabilitation shall apply to properties in R1, R2 or R3 zoned districts. These rates shall also be applied to parcels of property in other land use zones when such parcels (a) are being used as one-family or two-family residential sites at the time the assessment roll is levied; and (b) could not be subdivided under the then-existing Subdivision Ordinance. 2. The residential assessment rates for street and storm drainage reconstruction effective January 1, 2024, shall be as follows: Land Use 2024 Assessment Rates R1 zoned, used as one-family $5,138.00 per lot (street) site that cannot be subdivided $1,541.00 per lot (storm drainage) R2 zoned, or used as a two-family $68.5067 per front foot with a site that cannot be subdivided $5,138.00 per lot minimum (street) $20.5467 per front foot with a $1,541.00 per lot minimum (storm drainage) RESOLUTION NO. _______________ Land Use 2024 Assessment Rates R3 zoned (per unit) Assessable frontage x $68.5067 (street) Number of residential units Assessable frontage x $20.5467 (storm) Number of residential units 3. The residential assessment rates for partial street reconstruction effective January 1, 2024, shall be as follows: Land Use 2024 Assessment Rates R1 zoned, used as one-family $3,852.00 per lot (street) site that cannot be subdivided R2 zoned, or used as a two-family $51.3600 per front foot with a site that cannot be subdivided $3,852.00 per lot minimum (street) R3 zoned (per unit) Assessable frontage x $51.3600 (street) Number of residential units 4. The residential assessment rates for pavement rehabilitation effective January 1, 2024, shall be as follows: Land Use 2024 Assessment Rates R1 zoned, used as one-family $1,698.00 per lot (street) site that cannot be subdivided R2 zoned, or used as a two-family $22.6400 per front foot with a site that cannot be subdivided $1,698.00 per lot minimum (street) R3 zoned (per unit) Assessable frontage x $22.6400 (street) Number of residential units 5. The residential assessment rates for street and storm drainage reconstruction and pavement rehabilitation shall not apply to R4, R5, R6 or R7 zoned districts. The assessment rates for street reconstruction and pavement rehabilitation for R4, R5, R6 or R7 zoned property shall be based on an evaluation of the project cost and project benefit for each project. RESOLUTION NO. _______________ November 13, 2023 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:11/13/2023 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :Elizabeth H eyman, P ublic Works D irector BY:Lydia Ener, P.E., P rincipal Engineer S U B J E C T:Res olu2on Establis hing I nterest Rate for 2024 S pecial A sses s ments Requested Council A con: - Moon to approve a resoluon establishing interest rate for 2024 special assessments. B ackground: Each year the C ity Council s ets an interes t rate for special as s es s ments lev ied against proper2 es based on the C ity ’s S pecial A s s es s ment and I nternal L oan I nterest Rate Policy. T he obj ec2 ve of this policy is to establis h an equitable interes t rate that w ill not unfairly bur den the property ow ner yet recov er the cos t of borrow ing from outside s ources , r ecov er the cos t of adminis ter ing the special as s essments, and pr otect the City from the possibility that s pecial as s essment pr epayments might impair the City ’s ability to serv ice the bonds . City C ouncil policy has been to es tablis h the s pecial as s essment inter es t rate by calcula2 ng the s um of the interest rate for the most recent gener al obliga2on bond, adding tw o percent to cover the overhead costs described above and rounding to the neares t one-half percent in accordance with the policy. The most recent improv ement bond sale by the C ity of Brookly n C enter was a G eneral O bliga2on I mprov ement Bond at 3.5 percent which results in a s pecial asses s ment interest rate of 5.5 percent for 2024. B udget I ssues: N A I nclusive C ommunity Engagement: N A A nracist/Equity Policy Effect: N A S trategic Priories and Values: Key Transporta2on I nvestments AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip2on U pload D ate Type Res olu2on 11/6/2023 Resolu2on Le?er Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO._______________ RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING INTEREST RATE FOR 2024 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council levies special assessments for certain neighborhood street and utility projects, delinquent utility bills, and other services provided to property owners that go unpaid; and WHEREAS, amounts outstanding are certified to Hennepin County for collection with property taxes; and WHEREAS, by City Council policy, interest is to be charged on outstanding amounts certified to Hennepin County for collection with property taxes; and WHEREAS, the interest rate to be charged is two percent over the net interest rate for the most recent City General Obligation bond sale rounded up to the next one-half percent; and WHEREAS, the most recent General Obligation Improvement Bond sale resulted in a net interest rate of 3.5 percent. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the interest rate charged on outstanding special assessments for the year 2024 is hereby established at 5.5 percent. November 13, 2023 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:11/13/2023 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :Elizabeth H eyman, D irector of P ublic Works BY:Lydia Ener, P.E., P rincipal Engineer S U B J E C T:Res olu3on D eclaring Costs to be A s s essed and C alling for a P ublic H earing on P ropos ed S pecial A sses s ments for I mprovement P roject No. 2024-01, O rchard Lane East I mprovements Requested Council A con: - M oon to approve a r esoluon declar ing costs to be assessed and calling for a public hearing on proposed special assessments for I mprovement P roject No. 2024-01, Orchard Lane East I mprovements. B ackground: The O rchard L ane A rea is iden3fied in the Capital I mprovement P rogram (C I P ), and is slated for improvements during the 2 0 2 4 and 2 0 2 5 cons truc3 on season. T he a>ached feas ibility report prov ides a s ummary of the project evalua3 on proces s and preliminary s treet and u3lity improv ements . O n S eptember 25, 2023, the City C ouncil received the project feasibility report and an improvement public hearing w as conducted on O ctober 23, 2023, to consider thes e improvements. The a>ached res olu3on declar es certain project cos ts to be as s es s ed for the O rchard L ane East I mprovements and calls for a public hearing on the proposed s pecial asses s ments on D ecember 11, 2023. The purpose of holding the special as s es s ment hear ing prior to beginning the pr oject is to as s ur e that any objec3ons to or appeals of the as s es s ments ar e know n prior to enter ing into a cons truc3 on contract or is s uing bonds to finance the as s es s ed por 3on of the project. The establis hed as s essment r ate w ould s et the maximum levy amounts , guaranteeing property ow ners of the final cost they w ill pay for the pr oject. S pecial asses s ments for this project have been calculated in accordance w ith the C ity ’s S pecial A s s essment Policy. B udget I ssues: The total project cos t for the O rchard L ane East I mprovements is es 3mated to be $11,792,000. T he total s pecial asses s ments for this project are es 3mated to be $1,438,753.37 for street improvements . F unding s ources for the project are budgeted from s ources as des cribed in the project feas ibility report previously accepted by the City C ouncil on S eptember 25, 2023. T he s pecial asses s ment rates are propos ed to be adopted by the City C ouncil on N ovember 13, 2023, and funding s ource amounts that are included in the feas ibility report, amended w ith the rates proposed to be s et at the N ovember 13th City Council mee3ng, are: S pecial A s s essments $ 1,438,753.37 S anitary S ewer U 3lity F und $ 1,990,000.00 Water U3lity F und $ 3,978,000.00 S torm D rainage U3lity F und $ 884,000.00 S treet Recons truc3on F und $ 3,501,246.63 Total $ 11,792,000.00 I nclusive C ommunity Engagement: S taff conducted public informa3onal mee3 ngs w ith residents and property ow ner s on A ugust 3, 2023 and O ctober 19, 2023. A n I mprovement P ublic H earing w as held on O ctober 23, 2023 to receiv e public comments pertaining to the proposed improvements . A nracist/Equity Policy Effect: N A S trategic Priories and Values: Key Transporta3on I nvestments AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip3on U pload D ate Type Res olu3on 11/6/2023 Resolu3on Le>er D raH A s s essment Roll 11/6/2023 Backup M aterial D raH A s s essment M ap 11/6/2023 Backup M aterial Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO._______________ RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2024-01, ORCHARD LANE EAST IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center City Council has accepted the Engineer’s Feasibility Report for Improvement Project No. 2024-01, Orchard Lane East Improvements; and WHEREAS, the total cost of the street improvement portion of said project is estimated to be $3,501,246.63; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer have prepared a proposed assessment roll showing the proposed amount to be specifically assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. That portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners for street improvements included in City Improvement Project No. 2024-01 is declared to be $1,438,753.37. 2. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 11th day of December, 2023, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as part of the regular City Council meeting as the matter may be heard to pass upon said assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by said improvements will be given the opportunity to be heard with reference to said assessment. 3. The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. 4. The City Clerk shall cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. RESOLUTION NO. _______________ November 13, 2023 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. PROPERTY ID HOUSE STREET NAME LEVY# STREET NOTES 3411921320067 4300 63rd Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320001 4500 63rd Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320056 4518 63rd Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320075 4309 64th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320035 4501 64th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320009 4506 64th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320036 4507 64th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320037 4513 64th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320038 4601 64th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320025 4606 64th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320039 4607 64th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320040 4613 64th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320041 4619 64th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310081 3907 65th Avenue North 35,177.78$ R5 3411921310083 4001 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310084 4007 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310085 4013 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310086 4023 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310065 4107 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240018 4112 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240050 4200 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310032 4201 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240049 4206 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240048 4212 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240047 4218 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230066 4300 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230065 4306 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230064 4312 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230063 4318 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230062 4400 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320108 4401 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230061 4406 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230060 4412 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230059 4418 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230082 4500 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230081 4506 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320017 4507 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230080 4512 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230079 4518 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230078 4600 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230077 4606 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230076 4612 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230075 4618 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921140009 4706 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921140010 4712 65th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240025 4110 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240026 4200 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240032 4201 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240027 4206 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240033 4207 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240028 4212 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240034 4213 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240029 4218 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240035 4219 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240030 4224 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240036 4225 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240031 4230 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230003 4300 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230035 4301 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230004 4306 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230036 4307 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL November 13, 2023 2024 ORCHARD LANE EAST IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2024-01 1 PROPERTY ID HOUSE STREET NAME LEVY# STREET NOTES CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL November 13, 2023 2024 ORCHARD LANE EAST IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2024-01 3411921230005 4312 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230037 4313 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230006 4318 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230038 4319 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230007 4400 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230039 4401 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230108 4406 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230040 4407 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230009 4412 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230041 4413 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230103 4418 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230042 4419 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230100 4500 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230019 4501 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230102 4506 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230020 4507 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230110 4512 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230021 4513 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230014 4518 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230022 4519 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230105 4600 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230023 4601 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230109 4606 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230024 4607 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230104 4612 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230025 4613 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230101 4618 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230026 4619 66th Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310111 6437 Brooklyn Boulevard 12,516.14$ MX-N2 3411921240055 6503 Brooklyn Boulevard 35,155.45$ MX-N2 3311921410012 4700 Eleanor Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410025 4701 Eleanor Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410026 4707 Eleanor Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310099 6306 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310046 6307 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310098 6312 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310045 6313 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310097 6318 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310044 6319 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310096 6324 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310043 6325 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310095 6330 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310042 6331 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310041 6337 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310040 6343 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310039 6401 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310074 6406 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310038 6407 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310075 6412 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310037 6413 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310076 6418 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310036 6419 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310077 6424 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310035 6425 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310078 6430 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310034 6431 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310079 6436 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310033 6437 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310064 6442 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240019 6506 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240020 6512 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 2 PROPERTY ID HOUSE STREET NAME LEVY# STREET NOTES CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL November 13, 2023 2024 ORCHARD LANE EAST IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2024-01 3411921240021 6518 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240022 6524 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240023 6530 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240024 6536 Indiana Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310048 6300 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310049 6306 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310050 6312 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320065 6313 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310051 6318 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320064 6319 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310052 6324 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320063 6325 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310053 6330 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320062 6331 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310054 6336 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320061 6337 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310055 6342 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320060 6343 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310056 6400 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320099 6401 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310057 6406 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320098 6407 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310058 6412 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320097 6413 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310059 6418 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320096 6419 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310060 6424 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320095 6425 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310061 6430 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320094 6431 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310062 6436 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320093 6437 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310063 6442 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320092 6443 June Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320051 4500 Kathrene Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320052 4501 Kathrene Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320050 4506 Kathrene Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320053 4507 Kathrene Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320049 4510 Kathrene Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320054 4513 Kathrene Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320048 4514 Kathrene Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320047 4518 Kathrene Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320055 4521 Kathrene Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320046 4522 Kathrene Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320045 4526 Kathrene Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320068 6300 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320083 6301 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320069 6306 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320082 6307 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320070 6312 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320081 6313 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320071 6318 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320080 6319 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320072 6324 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320079 6325 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320073 6330 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320078 6331 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320074 6336 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320077 6337 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320076 6343 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320100 6400 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3 PROPERTY ID HOUSE STREET NAME LEVY# STREET NOTES CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL November 13, 2023 2024 ORCHARD LANE EAST IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2024-01 3411921320115 6401 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320101 6406 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320114 6407 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320102 6412 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320113 6413 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320103 6418 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320112 6419 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320104 6424 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320111 6425 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320105 6430 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320110 6431 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320106 6436 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320109 6437 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320107 6442 Kyle Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320084 6300 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320085 6306 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320059 6307 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320086 6312 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320087 6318 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320088 6324 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320089 6330 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320090 6336 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320091 6342 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320116 6400 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320008 6401 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320117 6406 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320007 6407 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320118 6412 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320006 6415 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320119 6418 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320005 6419 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320120 6424 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320004 6425 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320121 6430 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320003 6431 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320122 6436 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320002 6437 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320123 6442 Lee Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320010 6400 Major Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320024 6401 Major Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320011 6406 Major Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320023 6407 Major Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320012 6412 Major Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320022 6413 Major Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320013 6418 Major Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320021 6419 Major Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320014 6424 Major Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320020 6425 Major Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320015 6430 Major Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320019 6431 Major Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320016 6436 Major Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320018 6437 Major Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310094 6400 Marlin Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310073 6401 Marlin Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310072 6407 Marlin Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310092 6412 Marlin Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310091 6418 Marlin Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310071 6419 Marlin Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310090 6424 Marlin Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310070 6425 Marlin Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310089 6430 Marlin Drive 3,852.00$ R1 4 PROPERTY ID HOUSE STREET NAME LEVY# STREET NOTES CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL November 13, 2023 2024 ORCHARD LANE EAST IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2024-01 3411921310069 6431 Marlin Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310088 6436 Marlin Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310068 6437 Marlin Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310087 6442 Marlin Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310067 6443 Marlin Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921310066 6449 Marlin Drive 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320042 6324 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410011 6331 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410010 6337 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410009 6343 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320026 6400 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410008 6401 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320027 6406 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410007 6407 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320028 6412 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410006 6413 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320029 6418 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410005 6419 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320030 6424 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410004 6425 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320031 6430 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410003 6431 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320032 6436 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410002 6437 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320033 6442 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410001 6443 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921320034 6448 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921140008 6501 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921140007 6507 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921140006 6513 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921140005 6519 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921140004 6525 Noble Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410028 6300 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410046 6301 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410045 6307 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410027 6312 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410044 6313 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410043 6319 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410013 6324 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410042 6325 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410014 6330 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410041 6331 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410015 6336 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410040 6337 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410016 6342 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410039 6343 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410017 6400 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410038 6401 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410018 6406 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410037 6407 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410019 6412 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410036 6413 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410020 6418 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410035 6419 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410021 6424 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410034 6425 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410022 6430 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410033 6431 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410023 6436 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410032 6437 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921410024 6442 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 5 PROPERTY ID HOUSE STREET NAME LEVY# STREET NOTES CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL November 13, 2023 2024 ORCHARD LANE EAST IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2024-01 3311921410031 6443 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921140011 6500 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921140012 6506 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921140013 6512 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921140014 6518 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921140015 6524 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921140002 6530 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3311921140003 6536 Orchard Avenue North 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240041 4200 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240042 4201 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240040 4206 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240043 4207 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240039 4212 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240044 4213 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240038 4218 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240045 4219 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240037 4224 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921240046 4225 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230050 4300 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230051 4301 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230049 4306 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230052 4307 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230048 4312 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230053 4313 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230047 4318 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230054 4319 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230046 4400 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230055 4401 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230045 4406 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230056 4407 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230044 4412 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230057 4413 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230043 4418 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230058 4419 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230034 4500 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230067 4501 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230033 4506 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230068 4507 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230032 4512 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230069 4513 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230031 4518 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230070 4519 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230030 4600 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230071 4601 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230029 4606 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230072 4607 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230028 4612 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230073 4613 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230027 4618 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 3411921230074 4619 Winchester Lane 3,852.00$ R1 Total Assessments 1,438,753.37$ 6 §¨¦694 ")152 HALIFAX DR E W I N G A V E N 63RD AVE N 65TH AVE N L E E AV E N P E R R Y AV E N J U N E AV E N 66TH AVE N JOYCELN I N D I A N A AV E N N O B L E AV E N K Y L E AV E N WINCHESTER LN HOWE LN Q U A I L AV E N O R C H A R D AV E N M A R L I N D R D R E W AV E N 6 4 T H A VE N M A J O R A V E N REGENT AVE N KATHE R I N E D R F R A N C E AV E N G R I M E S A V E N ELEANO R LN WINC H E S T E R L N N O B L E AV E N K Y L E A V E N F R A N C E AV E NB R O O K L Y N B L V D M A J O R AV E N FRA NC E AVE N 66THAV E N ORCHARD A V E N 6511 4020 3907 6503 6404 6437 4 6 1 8 4 6 1 2 4 6 0 6 4 6 0 0 4001 4526 4522 4 6 1 3 45 0 0 4 5 1 2 4 5 0 6 4 4 1 8 4 0 0 7 6412 4 4 0 6 6407 6536 4 6 0 7 6324 4 6 0 1 4201 6512 4 5 1 0 6313 6506 6 3 0 7 4 4 1 96 5 3 6 4700 4200 4 5 1 46319 4 5 0 0 4 5 0 1 4 2 1 2 4 2 1 8 4 2 2 4 6307 4 2 3 0 4 3 0 0 4 3 0 6 4 3 1 2 4 3 1 8 4 4 0 0 4 4 1 2 4 5 1 8 6324 6300 6 4 4 9 6306 6312 6437 6 4 1 9 4 1 0 7 6400 4201 6507 6442 6 5 0 0 6 5 0 1 6318 4013 6325 6 5 1 8 4606 6431 4 4 1 8 6448 6 4 1 3 4 4 1 8 4 2 0 6 6 4 1 2 63244518 6 4 1 8 642 4 6430 4 11 2 4507 4513 6 4 0 7 4200 6513 6 4 2 4 6 4 3 7 4201 6330 64 01 6412 64136413 6 4 19 4212 4218 4312 4300 4306 4400 4318 4412 4406 4206 4212 4412 4413 4213 4207 64 2 5 44 1 9 6 4 0 6 402 36 43 6 6 4 3 0 6425 6512 6518 6530 6524 6 4 3 1 6 4 4 3 6 4 3 7 6 4 2 5 4507 6 5 0 6 4 5 3 0 6 43 6 6 3 0 0 64 3 1 6437 6431 4 5 0 6 6415 4309 6343 6336 6337 6330 6331 6318 6319 6312 6313 6306 4 3 0 06300 6313 64 19 4 6 1 9 6307 6 4 1 86424 6 4 0 1 6 4 1 2 6 4 3 0 6 4 2 4 6 4 3 6 6 4 1 8 6 4 0 6 6 4 3 0 6336 6342 6400 6 44 2 6406 6418 6424 6430 6436 6337 6401 6419 6443 6343 6407 6425 6437 6431 64426443 6437 6431 6425 6331 6419 6407 4206 4 5 0 1 4 5 0 7 4 5 1 3 6401 4 6 0 7 4 6 1 3 4 6 0 1 4 6 1 9 4 5 1 9 4 5 0 6 4 5 0 0 4 5 1 2 4 6 0 0 4 6 1 2 4319 4 6 0 6 4313 4413 4401 4 5 1 8 4 6 1 8 4407 4219 4225 4301 4307 4213 4207 6343 6337 6331 4218 4224 4300 4306 4312 4318 4400 44064 6 1 2 4 6 1 8 4 5 1 2 4 5 1 8 4 6 0 6 4 5 0 0 4 6 0 0 4 5 0 6 4 6 1 3 4 6 0 1 4 5 1 3 4 5 1 9 4 5 0 1 4 6 0 7 4 6 1 9 4 5 0 7 4407 4401 4319 4313 4307 4301 4225 4219 6330 6436 6430 6312 6306 6442 45004518 64016400 6407 6401 6406 6400 6413 6407 6412 6406 6419 6413 6418 6412 64196418 64316430 6437 6431 6436 6430 6443 6437 6442 6436 44016442 6300 6301 6 4 1 8 6306 6307 6312 6313 6318 6319 6330 6331 6336 6337 6342 6343 4110 6425 64196412 6413 6325 6407 6401 6 3 1 2 6343 6337 6331 6324 6400 6319 6 4 4 2 6301 4 7 1 2 4 7 0 6 6424 6418 6412 6406 6400 6342 6336 6330 6318 6300 6 4 3 6 6519 4 2 0 0 6407 4 7 0 1 6 4 0 0 4 5 0 1 6 3 0 1 6 4 0 6 4 7 0 7 6424 6425 6424 6425 6 4 0 1 6324 632563246325 6525 4 5 0 6 4521 6530 45074513 6524 Assessment MapOrchard Lane East Improvement Area Ü8/2/2023 Legend Proposed R1 Assessment (Unit Amount Basis) Proposed R5 Assessment (Acreage Basis) Proposed Mixed Use Neighborhood Assessment (Acreage Basis) Previously Assessed City Owned Property C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:11/13/2023 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :N/A BY:L aToya Turk, O ffice of C ommunity P reven/on, H ealth and S afety S U B J E C T:2024 Random A cts of K indnes s City Council P res enta/on Requested Council A con: 2024 P resenta/on recognizing nominators and nominees of Random A cts of K indnes s . Council M embers can take turns reading the nomina/ons . B ackground: The C ity of Brooklyn C enter proclaimed and designated O ctober 25th (in 2021) as Random A cts of K indnes s D ay. The C ity of Brooklyn C enter has celebrated Random A cts of K indnes s s ince 1997. A ll nominees are recognized by the City Council and pres ented a cer/ficate of apprecia/on at a separate celebra/on on S aturday, November 18th, 2023 at the Brooklyn C enter C ommunity C enter-Cons/tu/on H all from 12:00pm to 3:00pm. B udget I ssues: N/A I nclusive C ommunity Engagement: Random A cts of K indness promotes and recogniz es community engagement and s upport to all. A nracist/Equity Policy Effect: N/A S trategic Priories and Values: Enhanced Community I mage, I nclusive C ommunity Engagement, S afe, S ecure, S table Community, O pera/onal Excellence AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip/on U pload D ate Type R A K Nominator and Nomina/on S preadsheet 11/9/2023 Backup M aterial P roclama/on 11/9/2023 P roclama/on Nominator Nominee 1 Nominee 2 Nominee 3 Nominee 4 Allan Hancock BC Lions Club Mandora Young Darryl Sannes Chuck Humke Armando Oster Christina Jones Lydia Sheilds Arvid (Bud) Sorensen Sandy Becker Erwin Heisler Brenda Johnson Madeline Mork Wendy Christensen Darnell Hancock Michelle Auld Joan Schonning Dianne Sannes Susan Arneson Darryl Sannes Igbo Women League of MN Covid-19 Community Engagement- Amrill Okonkwo Alan Hancock Yang Family (quantity 5-6 individuals) Ms. Kim Kenny David Blas Michael Crenshaw Diane Sannes Pastor Ruth Ann Ramstad/BMUC Jill Dalton/Jack MacMillan Jamar Hester (Cub Store Manager) Megan Lindstrom (Doherty Staffing) Ginny Exel Russel Waisanen/Richard Kopf Lois Hattenberger Kathy and Don Winn John Solomon Barb Suciu Kavess'e Wicker Pamela Solomon Mrs. Kim Jones John Trautmann Jill Dalton (BC Garden Club) Julie Bourque Rebecca Walker Diana Bourque David Yang Melissa Morehouse Chance Thao Terrance Tate Suzy Juarez Parez Roxana Cruz-Lozano Ariel Ortega Peralta Sandra Domingo Silvia Lozano Alberto Vazquez Maria Ibarra Carillo Daniel Miranda Victor Marquez Brigida Martinez-Rubio Cesar Berrera Marina Olmeda Ezequial Aredondo Karen Jacobson Jan Tieden Kathy Winn Pastor Jim Verbout (LCM) Mary Senner Craig Phillips Nancy Lundgren Eddie Chesmer Raquel Goutierez Lowell Kpanyor Gladys Castellano Reese and Denise Fadina Keevin Miller Robin Hall Derrick and Andrea Lanz Greg and Donna Jones Robin Brisse Butch Zang Jeff Foss Jeff and Julie Basche Susan Arneson BC Lady Lions Chief Todd Berg and Commander Tony Soldiers 6 Tom Agnes TaLeia "ACE" Thomas C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:11/13/2023 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :J esse A nders on, C ommunity D evelopment D irector BY:G inny M cI ntosh, City P lanner and Zoning A dminis trator S U B J E C T:P lanning Commission A pplica0on No. 2023-007, S ubmi5ed by 7100 Brooklyn Blvd L L C , for Convers ion of a Former Credit U nion and O ffice Building into a 17-Unit M ul0-Family Res iden0al Building and Related I mprovements (7100 Brooklyn Boulevard) Requested Council A con: City C ouncil is being asked to cons ider tw o alterna0ves regarding P lanning C ommis s ion A pplica0on No. 2023-007: 1. A pproval of S ite and B uilding P lan (M ajor A mendment) for 7100 B rooklyn B oulevard Mo0on to direct s taff to pr epare a resolu0on approving the s ite and building plan (maj or amendment) as outlined in P lanning C ommis s ion A pplica0on N o. 2 0 2 3 -0 0 7 , w hich w ould conv ert a former credit union and office building to a 17-unit mul0-family residen0al building, s ubject to the outlined condi0ons of approval. 2. A pproval of S ite and B uilding P lan (M ajor A mendment) for 7100 B rooklyn B oulevard Mo0on to direct s taff to prepare a res olu0on denying the s ite and building plan (maj or amendment) as outlined in P lanning Commission A pplica0on No. 2023-007 with outlined findings of fact. B ackground: 7100 Brooklyn Blvd L L C (“the A pplicant”) is reques 0ng review and cons idera0on of a proposal that would convert a former credit union and office building located at 7 1 0 0 Brookly n B oulev ar d (“the S ubject P roperty ”), into a 1 7 -unit mul0-family residen0al building. The S ubject P r oper ty w as s old to the P roperty O w ner and A pplicant in March 2023 per H ennepin County records. S ec0on 35-7605 (A mendments) prov ides that a major amendment to an appr oved s ite and building plan s hall be triggered under certain outlined s cenarios, including a, “2 0 percent or greater change in the number of res iden0 al units .” A r ev iew of a major amendment under the C ity ’s U nified D ev elopment O rdinance s hall follow the procedure set forth for the issuance of a new site and building plan approval. A s the propos al w ould res ult in a 100-percent change in the number of residen0al units , this threshold is triggered. A public hearing no0 ce for the s ite and building plan request was published in the Br ookly n C enter S un Post on S eptember 28, 2 0 2 3 . M ail no0 fica0 ons were mailed to all phys ical addr es s es and tax payers within 350 feet of the S ubject P roperty and the no0ce pos ted to the City of Brooklyn Center ’s webs ite. The P lanning C ommis s ion held a public hearing and review ed the applica0 on reques t at their mee0ng on O ctober 12, 2023. I n advance of the public hearing, C ity staff received communica0on from the neighboring Brooklyn U nited M ethodist Church, who ow ns an overflow parking lot to the north of the S ubject P roperty (P I D : 27-119-21-32-0004) and a pe00 on compris ed of s ignatur es from 3 1 indiv iduals opera0ng out of the Boulevard P laza office condominiums located to the south of the S ubject P roperty. The author of the pe00on le5er, J eane5e Tuz ins ki, was als o present virtually during the hearing and s poke against the project, expr es s ing that this ar ea w as a bus ines s dis trict and w as not a res iden0 al area. S he noted that, despite ther e being 5 0 or s o parking s paces on-s ite, the credit union only ever us ed 15 or 20 parking spaces at mos t and it (S ubj ect P roperty) was essen0ally vacant. L ater in the hearing, she noted that the propos al was , “a good concept and I like it, just not there.” Tom Fos ter, Trus tee C hair for Brookly n U nited M ethodis t Church, w as als o pr esent at the mee0 ng and indicated that the only concer n they had was a reques t to extend a priv acy fence between the Church and S ubject pr oper 0es and towards Brooklyn Boulevard due to pedes trian traffic and dumpings on their overflow lot. H e indicated that, follow ing the pr es enta0 on prov ided by C ity staff and the noted occupancy w ithin the building, the us e likely won’t be as large of an issue as previous ly thought, but they s0 ll desired the fence. Resident D iane S annes inquired on the number of res idents who could poten0ally occupy each of the units and where the r es idents might recreate. A ddi0onal ques 0 ons w er e rais ed regarding the C ity ’s s tormw ater pond and the ability to fence the area and the number of vehicles parked on the S ubj ect P roperty. S he also noted a damaged tr ans for mer (later confirmed to be a phone company pedes tal) located jus t off of the S ubject P roperty in the right-of-way and general blight around the property. Representa0on of the A pplicant and P roperty O w ner w er e pres ent and addres s ed ques0 ons pos ed by the P lanning C ommis s ion, provided an ov erview of the building code r equir ements neces s ary to convert the building, and expr es s ed an overall w illingnes s to wor k w ith the C ity to meet City C ode r equir ements for the proposed us e. A s part of the public hearing process, the P lanning C ommis s ioners entered into a dialogue regarding the project and concerns iden0fied in the s ubmi5ed pe0 0on le5ers. The follow ing ques0 ons were pos ed by the P lanning C ommis s ioners : 1. Availability for outdoor amenity s pace (e.g. grilling areas) 2. S afety and security w ithin the building 3. The types of tenants likely to occupy the building (e.g. families , s ingle occupants ), unit mix, and propos ed rents 4. Availability of on-s ite management and general ques0ons regarding property ow ner 5 . O pportuni0es to addr es s concerns addr essed by the neighboring property owners and op0 ons for a fence adjacent to the Brooklyn U nited M ethodist C hurch overflow lot and along the City s tormw ater pond Following clos e of the public hearing, the P lanning Commission elected to r ecommend (3-2) City Council denial of the reques ted site and building plan (major amendment) for the S ubject P roperty located at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard and as contemplated under P lanning Commission A pplica0on No. 2023-007. Following the O ctober 12, 2023 P lanning Commission mee0ng, the A pplicant requested addi0 onal 0 me to address the concerns iden0 fied by Brooklyn United M ethodis t C hurch and B oulev ar d P laza O ffice Condominiums and make revis ions to their plans in advance of C ity C ouncil review. P urs uant to M innes ota S tatutes S ec0on 15.99, s ubdivis ion 3.f, C ity s taff requested a 60-day extens ion to the applica0on rev iew to allow the addi0 onal 0 me neces s ary for the A pplicant to res pond to the concerns pres ented by the neighboring property ow ners and for C ity staff to review the pres ented revis ions . The staff report has been updated to reflect thes e updates , w hich include s ome minor modifica0 ons to the east por0on of the parking lot, the addi0on of bike r ack s , and the extens ion of priv acy fencing along the northern property line. The photometric plan has also been updated per C ity s taff comment, and the A pplicant provided res pons es follow ing the P lanning C ommis s ion mee0 ng to addres s concerns outlined by thos e pres ent at the public hearing. A lthough the A pplicant expres s ed a w illingnes s to install a fence along the eastern property line and adjacent to the City ’s s tormw ater pond, there ar e numerous eas ements running through this area and there w ere addi0onal complexi0es in that the City requires access to the area for ongoing maintenance and repair of the pond area. The A pplicant inquired on w hether fencing along the s outher n pr oper ty line (B oulev ar d P laza O ffice Condominiums) was a possibility ; however, C ity staff expres s ed concerns with poten0ally boxing ow ner s in given the limited separa0 on between the S ubj ect P roperty, neighboring Boulevard P laz a, and their exterior mechanical equipment. Following the public hearing, P ham-Vang O ptometr y, w ho was one of the 3 1 pe00 oner s from the Boulevard P laz a O ffice Condominiums , s ubmi5ed a s eparate pe0 0on le5er. A ddi0onal email communica0on w as receiv ed from Brooklyn U nited M ethodis t C hurch in which Tom Fos ter noted that they w ere, “s ur pris ed w ith the disapproval of the propos al.” I t was further reiter ated that they w ould like to keep the r eques t for the privacy fence and inquired on the next s teps for r ev iew w ith C ity Council. Thes e communica0ons have been included for the record under Exhibit F in the updated s taff report. The C ity of Brooklyn Center H ous ing C ommis s ion receiv ed infor ma0on r egar ding the propos al at their mee0ng on O ctober 17, 2023 and w ere generally in favor of the propos ed conv er s ion of the former S pire (Electrus ) C r edit U nion building to 17-units of mul0-family r esiden0al and cited housing divers ity and choice as part of their s upport of the propos al. A ddi0onal comments w er e outlined regarding how the neighboring bus iness owner ’s grievances might be addressed, as well as gener al ques0 ons regarding the former building ’s us e and A DA accessibility. A n addi0onal request was made to review the mee0 ng minutes and recording of the P lanning Commission mee0ng on O ctober 12, 2023. City s taff has als o been in communica0 on w ith the A pplicant and P roperty O w ner regarding vehicles stored on the S ubj ect P roperty and their r emoval. The A pplicant noted that they w ere unaw are at the 0 me that the s toring of v ehicles w as not permi5ed in the dis trict the S ubject P roperty is located w ithin and hav e s ince removed vehicles from the property. A copy of the P lanning C ommis s ion Report for P lanning C ommis s ion A pplica0 on No. 2023-007, originally dated O ctober 12, 2023, and las t updated for the City C ouncil mee0 ng on N ovember 13, 2023 mee0 ng, is included. C ity staff requests C ity Council review and considera0on of the prov ided materials and the recommended adop0 on of a mo0on that would direct C ity s taff to pr epare a res olu0on for final ac0on and adop0on at the November 27, 2023 C ity C ouncil mee0ng. B udget I ssues: None to cons ider at this 0me. I nclusive C ommunity Engagement: A nracist/Equity Policy Effect: S trategic Priories and Values: Targeted Redevelopment AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip0on U pload D ate Type S taff Report and Exhibits - 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard (las t revis ed November 13, 2023)11/7/2023 Backup M aterial App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 1 Planning Commission Report Original Meeting Date: October 12, 2023 Last Revised: November 13, 2023 Application No. 2023-007 Applicant | Property Owner: 7100 Brooklyn Blvd LLC Location: 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Requests: Site and Building Plan (Major Amendment) Map 1. Subject Property Location. Requested Action 7100 Brooklyn Blvd LLC (“the Applicant”) is requesting review and consideration of a proposal that would convert a former credit union and office building located at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard (“the Subject Property”), into a 17-unit multi-family residential building—refer to Exhibit A. The Subject Property was sold to the Property Owner and Applicant in March 2023 per Hennepin County records. Section 35-7605 (Amendments) provides that a major amendment to an approved site and building plan shall be triggered under certain outlined scenarios, including a, “20 percent or greater change in the number of residential units.” A review of a major amendment under the City’s Unified Development Ordinance shall follow the procedure set forth for the issuance of a new site and building plan approval. As the proposal would result in a 100-percent change in the number of residential units, this threshold is triggered. A public hearing notice for the site and building plan request was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun •Application Filed: 09/12/2023 •Review Period (60-day) Deadline: 11/11/2023 •Extension Declared: Yes •Extended Review Period Deadline: 01/10/2024 App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 2 Post on September 28, 2023 (Exhibit B). Mail notifications were mailed to all physical addresses and tax payers within 350 feet of the Subject Property and the notice posted to the City of Brooklyn Center’s website. Existing Conditions Image 1. Existing Site Conditions at Subject Property. App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 3 Background The Subject Property appears to have originally been home to the City of Brooklyn Center City Hall offices before relocation to its current address of 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway. In 1985, under Planning Commission Application No. 85011 (Exhibit C), requests for site and building plan and special use permit approvals were requested by then Applicant Uhde/Nelson, Inc. to allow for the construction of two office buildings of approximately 21,180-square feet total. This was intended to be a two-phase proposal in which access to the sites were to have been via a single driveway off Brooklyn Boulevard, which was where the old City Hall entrance was located. The first and larger phase (west), which was ultimately constructed, was a two-story, approximately 14,000-square foot office building that was noted for occupancy by Edina Realty and slated for 70 parking spaces. The second phase (east), which was never constructed, was earmarked for a smaller two-story, approximately 7,000-square foot office building with 44 parking spaces. At that time, the Subject Property was collectively zoned R5 (Multiple Family Residence) District, which allowed for limited “office uses” as special uses in the R5 District. Although true mixed-use districts were not in place until adoption of the City’s Unified Development Ordinance in January 2023, the preceding zoning code did allow for limited non-residential uses within its higher density multi-family residential districts through issuance of a special use permit. Special uses at that time and within these districts included nursing homes, religious uses, public and private elementary and secondary schools, and “certain service-office uses” which were demonstrated to be compatible to and of comparable intensity to permitted R5 district land uses. These office uses were subject to what were then the C1 (Service/Office) District provisions and further restricted in that not all C1 District uses were permitted. An example of this would be the adjacent Boulevard Plaza office condominiums development, which was zoned R3 (Multiple Family Residence) District up until January of this year. This development, like the Subject Property, would’ve been limited to low intensity office uses such as financial, employment, and legal offices, and medical, dental, and chiropractic offices. It can be inferred from the former zoning code provisions that these office uses were specifically permitted through issuance of a special use permit as their intensities and general operations/hours would have minimal impacts on those uses which were permitted within the district (i.e. multi-family residential). With the adoption of the new Unified Development Ordinance in 2023, which includes the City’s zoning provisions, the Subject Property, along with a number of other properties fronting Brooklyn Boulevard, were re-zoned to the new Neighborhood Mixed-Used District designations of MX-N1 and MX-N2. With City approval of the two-phase commercial development in 1985, which included the Subject Property, the Subject Property and neighboring parcel to the east, which is unaddressed, were re-platted to 7100 Corporate Plaza Addition, and re-platted again to 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition. Certain shared access and signage provisions were recorded as part of these approvals given that the second phase would’ve been landlocked and without direct right-of-way access. In January 2023, and as part of the pending sale, City staff worked with the former property owner and the proposed buyer (Applicant) of the Subject Property to prepare an access easement and utility facilities agreement to ensure the City had a perpetual easement in place for access to certain drainage and utility easements running through the Subject Property and to the City’s stormwater pond, which is located where the second phase would have been located. This storage and treatment pond not only serves the App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 4 Subject Property, but the southern half of the City’s Woodbine neighborhood. City staff also worked through the termination of a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Maintenance Agreement for a private road intended for the second phase, which was never constructed, and a License Agreement for certain signage to be located on the Subject Property, which was no longer necessary. The Applicant initially entered into formal communication with City staff regarding plans to submit a Planning Commission application in June 2023. Although initial plans were submitted in July 2023 to City staff, a letter of incomplete was provided to the Applicant on July 24, 2023 as certain information, including project background information, civil and landscape plans, were not provided. It was at this time that City staff asked for revisions to the application materials, and requested a pre-application meeting to walk through the materials in advance of the upcoming Planning Commission application deadlines. City staff met with the Applicant and development team on August 15, 2023 to discuss the required plans and information for the proposal. A revised submittal was provided to City staff on September 12, 2023. Although the staff report was originally dated for the October 12, 2023 Planning Commission meeting, this staff report has since been updated to reflect revised architectural (October 25, 2023), civil (October 25, 2023), photometric (October 25, 2023), and landscaping (October 25, 2023) plans. The Applicant has also provided a series of responses to concerns raised regarding the Subject Property proposal at the October 12, 2023 Planning Commission meeting—refer to Exhibit A. Site Data: 2040 Land Use Plan: Neighborhood Mixed-Use (N-MU) – 15.01-31 DU/Ac. Neighborhood: West Palmer Lake Current Zoning: Neighborhood Mixed-Use District (MX-N2) – 15-31 DU/Ac. Site Area: Approximately 0.99 acres Surrounding Area: Direction 2040 Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use North PSP/Institutional | LDR (3.01-5 DU/Ac.) Neighborhood Mixed-Use District (MX-N2) | R1 (Low Density Residential) District Institutional (Brooklyn United Methodist Church Overflow Lot) | Single Family Detached South N-MU (15.01-31 DU/Ac.)Neighborhood Mixed-Use District (MX-N2) Office (Boulevard Plaza Office Condominiums) East Industrial/Utility Neighborhood Mixed-Use District (MX-N2) Undeveloped (City Stormwater Pond) West PSP/Institutional | High Density Residential (15.01-31 DU/Ac.) PUD/C1 (Planned Unit Development/Commercial 1) District | Neighborhood Mixed-Use District (MX-N1) Institutional (CEAP, Hennepin County Human Service Center, and Osseo Area Schools Offices) | Apartments (Willow Lane – 58 Units) SITE AND BUILDING PLAN REQUEST The Applicant requests to convert a former credit union and office building, which was initially approved by City Council in 1985 and constructed in 1986, to a 17-unit multi-family residential building. Section 35-4103 (Allowed Use Table) of the City’s Unified Development Ordinance allows for “multiple family dwellings” as a permitted use within the City’s Neighborhood Mixed-Use (MX-N2) District, subject to City Council approval of a site and building plan and in conformance with the City’s density requirements for the aforementioned district (15-31 dwelling units per acre), requirements with respect App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 5 to the site (e.g. parking, landscaping, photometric, screening), and as provided for within the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Table 1. Excerpt of Section 35-4103 (Allowed Use Table) and Proposed Use of Subject Property. The submitted proposal contemplates a conversion of the building to a 17-unit multi-family residential building, which is in conformance with the MX-N2 District’s density allowances for the 0.99-acre Subject Property. As proposed, the proposed redevelopment would be on the lower end of density permitted within the City’s MX-N Districts. This is reinforced through the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which denotes the Subject Property’s future land use designation as “Neighborhood Mixed-Use (N-MU)” and again, allows for a density range of 15.01 to 31 dwelling units per acre (DU/Ac.). A unit mix is provided in the architectural plan set, which indicates the following: Main Floor Unit # Unit Type Square Feet (SF) 101 2-Bedroom 706 102 1-Bedroom 686 103 Studio 495 104 Studio 466 105 1-Bedroom 482 106 1-Bedroom 476 107 1-Bedroom 677 Second Floor Unit # Unit Type Square Feet 201 1-Bedroom 617 202 1-Bedroom 344 203 1-Bedroom 342 204 1-Bedroom 344 205 Studio 302 206 Studio 428 207 1-Bedroom 531 208 Studio 252 209 1-Bedroom 395 210 1-Bedroom 414 Table 2. Unit Mix Breakdown for the Subject Property. App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 6 In reviewing the above table, City staff noted that the Applicant should verify unit types and sizes, as it appeared some of the 1-bedroom units are smaller than proposed studio units. As proposed, community amenities within and on the Subject Property would be fairly minimal. A shared laundry room is provided for on the main level and a private residence party room with small kitchenette space is located in the basement level—this space was formerly used as a training room for the former user, Electrus (Spire) Credit Union. The civil plans have been updated to incorporate a bike rack to the east end of the property. Image 2. Revised Site Plan for Subject Property (October 25, 2023). Site Design As proposed, the proposed conversion from the existing office building use to multi-family residential would result in limited impacts to the existing exterior areas of the Subject Property. Although there are plans to remove an existing standalone ATM located at western edge of the property, re-stripe and remove certain parking within the surface parking lot, and install a new, expanded trash enclosure along the eastern edge of the property, almost all work would be contained to the interior of the building. Traffic | Access |Circulation | Connection There are no plans to alter the existing curb cut, which is located off the east side of Brooklyn Boulevard and provides full vehicular access to and from the Subject Property. Similarly, there are no major plans to alter the existing surface parking lot and circulation given that the majority of work would be contained to the interior of the former office building. A multi-use trail currently runs parallel to the property line of the Subject Property and along Brooklyn Boulevard. The 723 (local) Metro Transit bus line provides service at stops located just off the Subject Property, with service by the 761 (express) line located to the north. Following communication with City staff, the Applicant revised their plans to incorporate a bike rack to the east side of the building. App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 7 Image 3. Existing Access, Parking, and Circulation on Subject Property. Parking The Subject Property appears to have 64 parking spaces available to date, although some of the parking spaces appear too narrow for parking purposes. As proposed, the Applicant intends to remove five (5) parking spaces located just outside the doors located on the east side of the building to allow for the turning movements necessary for a garbage truck and the bike rack and an additional five (5) parking spaces at the northeast end of the parking lot to accommodate the new trash enclosure. The City’s Unified Development Ordinance, as outlined under Section 35-5506 (Required Parking Spaces), notes a maximum provision of two (2) parking spaces per dwelling unit in multi-family residential situations. Assuming 17 dwelling units, a maximum of 34 parking spaces is required per Code. Even with the removal of parking spaces, the Applicant intends to provide 52 on-site parking spaces. Although this results in a surplus of approximately 18 parking spaces, City staff did not push for the removal of existing impervious to fall within Code requirements to provide additional green or amenity space as there are other potential implications to consider with respect to Watershed rules. As it stands, the submitted plans denote a total impervious surface coverage of 76-percent, which falls below the City’s newly outlined maximum impervious coverage of 80-percent for Neighborhood Mixed- Use District properties. As the Subject Property is non-conforming with respect to setback regulations and parking lot placement as outlined under the Neighborhood-Mixed Use District provisions, City staff would welcome future opportunities to provide residents with additional outdoor amenity space. As is demonstrated in the submitted plans, the minimum drive aisle widths and dimensional standards outlined within Section 35-5504 (Parking Space Standards) appear to be met. In order to manage parking and as part of the plan updates, the Applicant also intends to provided dedicated parking space (numbering) for each of the units and as a means to manage parking. App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 8 Lighting Image 4. Revised Photometric Plan for the Subject Property (October 25, 2023). An original photometric plan submitted as part of the October 12, 2023 report contained a number of deficiencies with the lighting requirements as outlined under City Code for open air parking lots, fixture types, and illumination levels with respect to the neighboring uses. In response to City staff comments, the Applicant worked with a different lighting contractor to revise the lighting plans per City Code requirements. Any and all lighting and fixtures shall comply with City Code provisions as outlined under Section 35-5400 (Exterior Lighting). The revised plans appear to generally fall within the allowable open- air parking lot illumination levels permitted under City Code. Similarly, the proposed light poles are noted as 20 feet in height, which falls within the maximum allowable pole heights, and the wall fixtures have since been revised from wall-packs, which are not permitted except for service/loading areas, to LED wall sconces. The illumination levels along the building have also since been reduced following City staff concerns regarding excessive lighting levels and potentially negative impacts on abutting single family residential properties. Given the proximity of single-family residential to the north, it is important that any and all lighting limits glare and light spill into the backyards of these properties. Although the wall fixtures appear to generally meet the minimum illumination levels for primary entrances and exits, City staff requests additional illumination levels be provided for the lighting over the exit door located on the north elevation. Trash | Screening An existing trash enclosure is located on the east side of the Subject Property; however, the Applicant proposes to replace and relocate the trash area further to the east, towards the edge of the parking lot. The existing trash enclosure would be removed and the area would be re-purposed for snow storage. When City staff first met with the Applicant, concerns were raised as to a garbage truck’s ability to App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 9 navigate this area as it appeared there were no areas to turn around. This would have required a garbage truck to pick up trash at the eastern edge of the parking lot and navigate in reverse all the way back (west) towards the Brooklyn Boulevard entrance before turning around. Image 5. Turning Movement Diagram for Subject Property. City staff requested the Applicant provide a turning diagram showing that the turning movements could be made by a typical garbage truck. Following this, the Applicant’s team revised the site plan to make alterations to the east portion of the parking lot and removed the parking located just outside the east doors to allow for maneuvering. A turning movements diagram (Sheet C6—Exhibit A and Image 5 above) was provided that demonstrates the ability for a 30-foot long truck to navigate the trash enclosure and parking lot area. City staff had previously requested striping and signage to ensure no one parked or obstructed this area—the civil plans have since been revised to indicate a painted access aisle with white cross hatching. As proposed, the new, expanded trash enclosure would be constructed of brick or stone to match the existing brick building and with precast concrete caps. The enclosure appears to feature wooden, opaque doors. Although no measurements are provided, the new trash enclosure should be located a minimum of five (5) feet off the interior property line. All ground mounted equipment over 30-inches in height or greater than 12-cubic feet (e.g., transformers, mechanical) shall be effectively screened from public view. Similarly, roof-mounted equipment shall also be screened from view through use of parapets, wall/ fencing materials, or paint compatible and complementary to the building. In visiting the Subject Property, City staff noted clear visibility to the neighboring single-family residential to the north—refer to Image 6 below. Although the City approvals noted under Planning Commission Application No. 85011 acknowledged an existing cedar hedge along the north and east property lines as an appropriate method of screening from the residential uses, it was also stipulated that replacement screening would be required were it to fail. App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 10 Image 6. Existing Parking Lot (Eastern) at Subject Property and Visibility of Single-Family Residential | Revised Fencing. Although there is an existing chain link fence in place, City staff requested the Applicant revise the screening along the north property line to comply with the City’s screening standards and specifically to minimize the negative impacts of vehicle lights shining into single-family residential yards as they navigate the parking lot—these provisions are addressed under Section 35-5608 (Screening). In reviewing the originally submitted preliminary landscape plan, a new section of 6-foot cedar fence was provided for along the north end of the east parking lot. City staff requested the fence be located outside the identified easement running along the northern property line. Following the Planning Commission and public hearing on October 12, 2023, the Applicant requested City staff allow for the revision of plans to address comments made by Brooklyn United Methodist Church for a privacy fence along the northern property line and to address City staff comments. Although concerns were also raised regarding the City holding pond, which is to the east of the Subject Property, there are a number of easements running through the Subject Property and the City has an agreement with the Subject Property ownership for continued and unrestricted access to the holding pond via the Subject Property for ongoing maintenance and repair of the pond. This presented challenges and constraints with respect to the type of fencing required and minimum clear access requirements for equipment. The revised plans now reflect a 6-foot cedar fence running almost the entire length of the northern property line. In communication with the Applicant, City staff requested a buffer from the above ground equipment (e.g. transformers) located off Brooklyn Boulevard as Xcel Energy has minimum buffer requirements for equipment walls and doors and to comply with maximum height provisions in the front yard area. Architectural Materials There are no plans to alter the exterior of the building, with the exception of some identified tuckpointing required on the existing brick exterior. A new engineered canopy would be installed over a proposed exterior mailbox area located outside the main doors and to match the existing main entry canopy—refer to Image 7 below. City Code requires no less than 60-percent face brick, natural or colored stone, pre-colored or factory stained or stained on site textured pre-cast concrete panels, textured concrete block, stucco, glass, App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 11 fiberglass, or similar materials. Although this requirement appears to have been met, City staff requests a rendering with a schedule breakdown of building materials by percent—this is both for compliance and for record-keeping purposes. Image 7. Subject Property Exterior with Proposed Minor Alterations and Maintenance. Landscaping As there is a previously approved landscape plan on file for the Subject Property, approved in 1985 under Planning Commission Application No. 85011, City staff requested the Applicant work off this plan as a baseline. It should be noted that the approved landscape plan contemplated the two-phase development; therefore, there are certain plantings contemplated in the original 1985 plan that were never installed. The 1985 plans noted a provision for 13 deciduous trees (i.e. Japanese White Birch, Pin Oak, Green Seedless Ash), 15 Evergreens/Conifers (i.e. Colorado Green Spruce), 190 deciduous shrubs (i.e. Red- twigged Dogwood, Goldflame Spirea, Lilacs), and 29 Evergreen Shrubs (i.e. Mugho Pines, Moppet Junipers, Mint Julep Junipers). Although difficult to read, it appears certain ornamental trees, including Canada Red Cherry and Red Splendor Crab, were to be planted. The Applicant provided a preliminary plan schedule and landscape plan, which was reviewed as part of the October 12, 2023 report. At the time, City staff noted that, while Green Ash trees are native to Minnesota, they have generally been overplanted and with the presence of Emerald Ash Borer in the state, are becoming less and less common. The provided Field Tree Inventory Log (Table 4—below) denotes a five (5) Green Ash trees present on the Subject Property that are identified as in “poor condition” and noted with “EAB” (Emerald Ash Borer). City staff requests the Applicant determine if there are any opportunities to treat the trees given their deteriorating condition. If not, City staff requests the Applicant work with a City approved certified arborist to remove the trees in a manner that minimizes the spread of Emerald Ash Borer. In addition, select Hackberry and Siberian Elms were noted as in poor condition as well. These trees, if removed, would ultimately require replacement of similar type. The City’s new provisions surrounding landscaping stress that no more than 40-percent of the total trees should be of the same species—this is to promote species diversity and resilience. Additionally, landscape vegetation should emphasize native and resilient plant types where possible. App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 12 The Applicant has since revised the landscape plans (October 25, 2023) to incorporate 10 additional Isanti Redosier Dogwoods (shrubs). An underground irrigation system is required for install in all landscaped areas to help facilitate site maintenance and was noted in the 1985 approvals—this requirement still stands today and any new areas of landscaping or areas with damaged or missing landscaping would require replacement. The submitted landscape plan identifies existing turf and irrigation lines intended to remain as well as new drip irrigation to be installed around the building foundation planting areas. In reviewing the originally submitted landscape plans, City staff noted a considerable area along the northern property line was proposed for the installation of wood mulch, which is considered a temporary ground cover. Although edging can be utilized to help contain the mulch, City staff expressed concern with the proximity of this area to the City’s stormwater pond and the fact that a portion of this area is intended for snow storage. With this in mind, City staff requested the Applicant identify alternative landscaping measures for this area. The Applicant has since revised the landscape plans to reflect the installation of rock mulch in those areas surrounding the trash enclosure and snow storage areas before transitioning to wood mulch along the property line area. This is generally acceptable to City staff. Table 3. Revised Preliminary Plant Schedule for the Subject Property. App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 13 Table 4. Submitted Field Tree Inventory Log for the Subject Property. Signs The Applicant requested reuse of the existing sign cabinet located at the top of the building and facing Brooklyn Boulevard, which is approximately 61-square feet in size. Any new signage would be required to comply with the provisions outlined within Section 35-6000 (Signs) of the City Code. Although the sign size appears to exceed the City’s maximum wall size provisions for multiple family dwelling units, Section 35-6300 (Nonconforming Signs) stipulates that, “nonconformities will generally be permitted to continue under the provisions of this Code;” therefore, it is interpreted that a replacement panel would be permitted. Should the wall sign be majorly altered or the cabinets replaced in the future, the sign would be required to comply with City Code requirements. Engineering Review James Soltis, Assistant City Engineer, reviewed the submitted plans and provided a memorandum dated October 4, 2023 (Exhibit D). Although a review of the revised plan sets was conducted, all conditions outlined in the October 4, 2023 memo are still applicable. The memo requests alterations to the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) identification signage locations. Further, the proposed sidewalks do not appear to meet ADA regulations with respect to grading and will require revision to meet Section 406 of the 2020 Minnesota Accessibility Code provisions for landings and ramps. The Applicant will also be required to obtain permits from Hennepin County for any potential work in the right-of-way (Brooklyn Boulevard). Building and Fire Review Building Official Dan Grinsteinner conducted a cursory review in a memorandum dated October 9, 2023 (Exhibit E) of the proposal for the Subject Property and indicated that fire sprinkler and monitoring systems are required by code and are required to be maintained at all times. Given the proposed conversion, select sprinkler heads and systems may need to be relocated as part of the multi-family buildout. The Applicant will also need to meet any minimum ADA requirements for any exterior and interior building improvements, and prior to the issuance of building permits, a SAC determination shall be submitted to App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 14 the Metropolitan Council given the change of use. Any associated fees shall be paid at time of permit issuance. Although the work appears to be minimal, the Applicant should coordinate with the Hennepin County Health Department to ensure no approvals are necessary for the private residence party room located in the basement level. All building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. CPTED Review City staff requests that as part of any construction set review and in advance of any permit release, a CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Design) review be completed by City staff. Further, the Property Owner (Applicant) will be required to apply for and maintain a rental license with the City of Brooklyn Center, and in advance of any occupancy. Other Considerations | Public Comment (to date) As mentioned in the beginning of the report, a public hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post, and mail notifications sent to all physical addresses within 350 feet of the Subject Property. On October 4, 2023 City staff received a voicemail from a business owner located within the Boulevard Plaza office condominiums, located just south of the Subject Property. On October 6, 2023, City staff received a letter with an attached petition comprised of signatures from 31 individuals operating out of the Boulevard Plaza office condominiums. The aforementioned letter is included for the record as Exhibit F— it should be noted that City staff has redacted the email addresses and phone numbers on the petition. The letter provided outlines a variety of concerns, including but not limited to: •Changing the environment of the area to one of a residential area rather than business district; •Ongoing and continued safety concerns; •Ongoing and increased traffic (both foot and vehicle); •Dumping concerns; and •Privacy concerns On October 11, 2023 City staff received an email from representation of Brooklyn United Methodist Church, who indicated a, “vested interest in the housing proposal because our parking lot abuts the property in question.” They inquired on the proposal and requested installation of a privacy fence between the Subject Property and the overflow lot. A follow-up email was sent to City staff following the public hearing. Pham-Vang Optometry, who initially signed the petition letter presented by the Boulevard Plaza office condominiums submitted a separate letter of petition following the public hearing on October 13, 2023. These letters have been included as part of Exhibit F. ANTICIPATED PERMITTING AND CONDITIONS Following a review of the submittal materials and the request, City staff recommends the following conditions be attached to any positive recommendation on the approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2023-007 for the conversion of the former Electrus (Spire) Credit Union office building, located at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard, to a 17-unit multi-family residential building: 1.Any major changes or modifications made to this Site and Building Plan, and as outlined App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 15 within the City Code, can only be made by an amendment to the approved Site and Building Plan as approved by the City Council. i.Photometric Plans and any proposed lighting fixtures are to comply with Section 35-5400 (Exterior Lighting). ii.Revise submitted preliminary landscape plan to clearly identify mitigative measures to address existing trees, including Green Ash, that are in “poor condition.” A plan noting proposed tree removals should be provided with proposed replacements. Any landscaping removed shall be replaced with similar planting types and in accordance with Section 35-5600 (Landscaping, Screening, and Fences). 2.Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view per City Code requirements and a detail sheet provided. All trash and recycling shall be contained within the enclosure area and regular trash and recycling pick ups scheduled based upon the needs of residents. i.Per City Code requirements, the proposed trash enclosure shall be located a minimum of five (5) feet from the interior and rear property lines. 3.The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official and as outlined in the memorandum dated October 9, 2023 with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 4.The Applicant shall work to ensure all applicable Minnesota Fire Code requirements have been met as part of any site plan approval and with respect to the proposed modifications to the building. i.A fire sprinkler system is required to be installed and shall be maintained on a consistent basis per City Code requirements. 5.A SAC Determination shall be submitted by the Applicant to the Metropolitan Council for the change of use and any associated fees paid at time of any permit issuance. 6.Application to and approval from the Hennepin County Health Department as needed for the amenity space identified as the private residence party room. 7.The Applicant shall provide any final site and building plans to City staff for a CPTED review and make alterations as necessary prior to permit release. 8.The Applicant shall ensure an irrigation system is in place to facilitate maintenance of new and existing site landscaping and green areas, and irrigation shop drawings for any new systems shall be submitted for review and approval prior to installation. 9.The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the Assistant City Engineer’s review memorandum, dated October 4, 2023. 10.The Applicant shall submit a Sign Permit Application for any proposed signage (e.g., wall, freestanding) and receive issuance of a permit prior to any installation. 11.The Property Owner (Applicant) shall apply for and maintain a City of Brooklyn Center Rental License. No building occupancy shall be granted prior to issuance of a City Rental License. ALTERNATIVES 1.Vote to recommend City Council approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2023-007 for approval of a site and building plan for the Subject Property located at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard with the above-outlined conditions of approval. By voting to approve this application, the site and building plan would be approved for the conversion of a former credit union and office building to a 17-unit multi-family residential building, subject to the above-noted conditions of approval. App. No. 2023-007 PC 10/12/2023 | Revised CC 11/13/2023 Page 16 2.Vote to recommend City Council denial of Planning Commission Application No. 2023-007 for approval of a site and building plan for the Subject Property located at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard. By voting to deny this application, the request to convert the former credit union and office building to a 17-unit multi-family residential building would be denied with outlined findings of fact. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A – Planning Commission Application No. 2023-007 Plans and Documents, submitted September 12, 2023, and last revised October 25, 2023. Exhibit B – Public Hearing Notice, submitted for publication in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post, dated September 28, 2023. Exhibit C – Report and Documentation for Planning Commission Application No. 85011. Exhibit D – Review Memorandum, prepared by Assistant City Engineer James Soltis, dated October 4, 2023. Exhibit E – Review Memorandum, prepared by Building Official Dan Grinsteinner, dated October 9, 2023. Exhibit F – Boulevard Plaza Office Condominiums Letter of Petition, dated October 6, 2023, Email Communication from Brooklyn United Methodist Church, dated October 11, 2023 and October 13, 2023, and Pham-Vang Optometry LLC Letter of Petition, dated October 13, 2023. Exhibit A T-100 LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE 1 N 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 2 9 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 7100 BOULEVARD PLAZA 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 SHEET INDEX2 PROJECT LOCATION SHEET T-100 TITLE SHEET WITH LOCATION MAP AND SHEET INDEX SHEET T-101 CODE REVIEW / PROJECT NARRATIVE SHEET T-102 SECURITY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS / UNIT BREAKDOWN SHEET A-001 BASEMENT PLAN SHEET A-101 MAIN FLOOR PLAN SHEET A-102 SECOND FLOOR PLAN SHEET A-201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET A-202 EXTERIOR PHOTO SHEET A-301 BUILDING WALL SECTION / INT ELEV / DETAIL SHEET A-302 ADA BATH PLAN / ELEVS SHEET A-303 LAUNDRY ROOM ELEVS / BATH DETAILS SHEET A-304 ADA KITCHEN ELEVATIONS / DETAILS SHEET A-501 UL DETAIL IIC STC SHEET A-502 UL DETAIL IIC STC SHEET A-503 DOOR SCHEDULE SHEET A-504 DOOR SCHEDULE T-101 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 2 9 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 CODE REVIEW1 PROJECT NARRATIVE2 Code Review Code Review by Deborah Everson 612.237.0108 Owner of Project = 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard LLC Project Location = 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Intent = Conversion / Alteration from B office to new apartments R-2 Code Used = 2020 Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings 301.3.1 Prescriptive Compliance Method which refers to 2020 Minnesota Building Code Existing Building Height = 2 stories (31'-2”) with partial basement Existing Building Footprint Main = 6046 sf Gross F (7 Apartments) 2nd = 5533 sf Gross (10 Apartments) Building Area (to outside of walls / footprint) Basement = 1927 sf Gross with Small Assembly Room = 735 sf This Building has an existing sprinkler system, a fire detection system and a fire alarm system. These items will be reviewed and updated by Professionals as required. This Building has an existing parking lot, ADA parking spaces and ADA way into the building. Parking lot also has pole lighting. IBC 1004.5 Proposed Occupant Load Basement Assembly Room = 735sf/15sf/O = 49 Occupants Main Floor = 4300 sf / 200 sf / O = 22 Occupants Second Floor = 4315 sf / 200 sf / O = 22 Occupants (Total OL = 93) Previous Occupancy = B (Bank) Proposed Occupancy = Non Separated R-2 (17 Apartments) with Accessory Use of B (one small assembly room in basement] Note MCCE 1011.4.1 R Apartments are a higher means of egress hazard than banks, therefore use IBC Chapter 10. IBC 601 Fire Resistance Rating Requirements for building elements for Type of Construction = IIIB + Sprinkled throughout Primary Structural Frame, Interior Partitions, Floor, Roof = 0 Bearing Walls = 2 System required and provided (to be reconfigured by Professional) IBC 1006.3 Minium Exits At main and second floor = 2 exits provided with Maximum common path of egress travel distance = 125' Provided at second floor - exist paths less than 125' MCCE 1011.7.2 Stairways exception 2 = stair enclosure not required if stairs serve one other floor IBC 1020.1 All corridors to have ½ Hour Fire Resistance Rating All doors on corridors to have 20 minute Fire Rating IBC 1020.2 Minium corridor width 44 inches, provided is minimum 60 inches IBC1020.6 Corridor Continuity - to include the unenclosed stairways IBC 1008.2.1 Minimum 1 foot candle at walking surface under emergency power IBC 1030.1 Emergency Escape and Rescue Exceptions 4.1 and 4.2 = Building has automatic sprinkler system and 2 means of egress IBC Sound Transmission = Partitions & Floor /Ceilings = Minimum 50 STC & IIC IBC 1209.2 Finish Materials for walls, floors and showers shall comply IBC 1206 Interior walls between units to have STC rating of not less than 50 IBC 404.6 exception 3 & 4 Atrium - no smoke control required as atrium is not more than 2 floors high IBC 420.5 Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Detection Alarms in every Bedroom and Kitchen in every Unit. Project narrative There are many reason this building works as an apartment building: The building appears to be in a sale location of the city: ·7100 Brooklyn Blvd is located across the street from Northwest Human Services Center / Community Emergency Assistance. ·The parking lot wraps the building on three sides for clear visual to the front door ·The building itself is simple and there are no hidden places for trouble to begin The building has a layout that is conducive to apartment living: ·Only two stories make exiting in case of an emergency very obvious and fast ·Exits on either end of the main corridor make choice of emergency exit simple ·Atrium in main entrance is welcoming and full of daylight. It is a nice building to enter into ·An elevator is helpful for anyone unable to use stairs ·Ribbon windows allow natural light into every unit ·Small number of apartments: 17 units available ·49 person event room in the lower level is access by stairs or elevator for events, celebrations, parties, etc. The Building location is advantageous to the tenants - many amenities close by: ·One block to St. Alphonsus Park and Willow Lane Park ·½ mile north of Hyw 94 / 694 ·Only blocks to churches, grocery stores, restaurants, clinics and other important places ·On site laundry (shared) ·On site recycling and garbage (outside) ·Surface parking with 2 parking spaces per apartment and guest parking available Current rental rates in Brooklyn Center (north side of 94/694 with similar amenities) ·Studio Apartments $1000 ·One Bedroom Apartments $1200 ·Two Bedroom Apartments $1500 T-102 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 2 9 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 UNIT BREAKDOWN2 UNIT # 101 TYPE - TYPE B - 2 BDRM SQ FT 706 102 B - 1 BDRM 686 103 B - STUDIO 495 104 466B - STUDIO 105 482B - 1 BDRM 106 476B - 1 BDRM 107 677A - 1 BDRM 201 617B - 1 BDRM 202 344B - 1 BDRM 203 342B - 1 BDRM 204 344B - 1 BDRM 205 302B - STUDIO 206 428B - STUDIO 207 531B - 1 BDRM 208 252B - STUDIO 209 395B - 1 BDRM 210 414B - 1 BDRM MA I N F L O O R SE C O N D F L O O R SECURITY SYSTEM ORDINANCE1 ELEVATOR 111 CLOSET 004 739 SF PRIVATE RESIDENCE PARTY ROOM 005 KITCHEN 006 HALL 001 BATH 007 STAIR A 110STORAGE 002 BASEMENT PLAN DRAWN BY OTHERS - DRAWING DIMENSIONS HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS IN FIELD. THIS PLAN IS EXISTING TO REMAIN - WITH SOME MINOR MODIFICATIONS OR FINISH UPDATES 28'-5 1/4" ELECTRICAL OUTLETS UPDATE REQUIRED ONE WAY DOOR PUSH PLATE PANIC HARDWARE REQUIRED PROVIDE DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE TO INFORM USER ABOUT EXISTING ADA COMPLIANT UNISEX RESTROOM ON MAIN FLOOR FIRE SUPPRESSION SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM TO BE UPDATED BY PROFESSIONAL FIRE SUPPRESSION COMPANY SMOKE & CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTION ALARMS REQUIRED A-001BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 N 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 2 9 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR LOCATION OF TRASH ENCLOSURE TRASH ENLOSURE SIZE IS 11'X30' WITH 2 STEEL FRAMED SWING DOORS - CEDAR FACING - EACH 10' WIDE UP K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS UP DN DN K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS 4'- 0 " MI N COLUMN 5' - 0 " 5'-0" 2'-0" COLUMN ENTRY 109 DRAWING DIMENSIONS HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS IN FIELD. HATCHED AREAS ARE EXISTING TO REMAIN - WITH SOME MINOR MODIFICATIONS OR FINISH UPDATES TEXTURED ADA BARS AT EVERY TOILET, SHOWER AND TUB VESTIBULE 108 ELEVATOR 111 BATH 112 CORRIDOR 113 706 SF/2 BR UNIT 101 101 686 SF/1 BR UNIT 102 102 498 SF/STUDIO UNIT 103 103 466 SF/STUDIO UNIT 104 104 482 SF/1 BR UNIT 105 105 476 SF/1 BR UNIT 106 106 677 SF/1 BR UNIT 107 107 STAIR A 110 STAIR B 115 EXIT 116 127 SF LAUNDRY 114 52' EGRESS PATH55' EGRESS PATH 11'-10 3/8"11'-9 1/4"14'-3"9'-7"22'-8"19'-8 1/2" 24 ' - 3 3 / 8 " 15 ' - 3 " 23 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 33 ' - 7 3 / 8 " 30 ' - 7 3 / 8 " 12'-6 1/2"11'-5 1/2"14'-2 1/8"23'-10 1/8" 10 7 A 10 7 B 10 7 C 107D 10 6 A 106B 106C 10 6 D 10 5 E 10 5 A 105B 105C 105D 10 4 A 104B 10 4 C 103A 103B 103C 102B 10 2 A 102C 102E 10 1 A 101B 101C 101D 101E 101F 101G 101H 102D DW 116 116A SMOKE AND CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTION ALARMS IN EVERY BEDROOM AND KITCHEN & LAUNDRY AREA SD SD/CO SD SD/CO SD SD SD/CO SD SD/CO SD/CO SD SD/CO SD SD/CO SD/CO SD 10 6 E 10 5 F PER CITY ORIDINANCE CHAPTER 35 SECTION 35-5301 SECURITY SYSTEMS AND DEVICES: SEE TEXT ON SHEET T-101 MA I L USPS 4C MAILBOX WITH NEW CANOPY 3'-0" 5' - 0 " 28 ' - 2 7 / 8 " 16 ' - 9 3 / 8 " 13 ' - 6 3 / 8 " 13 ' - 2 7 / 8 " 10 ' - 8 1 / 8 " 2' - 0 " 4' - 7 " 14 ' - 7 1 / 4 " 4'-0" 6' - 2 1 / 2 " 7' - 4 " 10 ' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 4'-0" 5'-0" 5' - 0 " 9' - 4 5 / 8 " 8' - 7 7 / 8 " 7' - 2 1 / 4 " 10 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 1 1 / 2 " 6' - 8 " 5' - 0 " 9'-7" 11 ' - 9 " 13 ' - 7 " 13 ' - 9 " 28 ' - 6 " 14'-5" 18'-3 3/4" 12 ' - 1 1 / 4 " 11'-7 1/8"11'-5"11'-10 1/8" 19'-8 1/2" 6' - 7 " 5' - 0 " 6' - 1 " 11'-3 1/8" 9'-6 1/2" 10'-3 7/8"11'-9 1/8" 31 ' - 5 3 / 8 " 31 ' - 5 3 / 8 " 62 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " BATH FAN TO EXTERIOR REQUIRED AT EVERY BATHROOM 11 4 A-101MAIN FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 N 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 2 9 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 DN DN DRAWING DIMENSIONS HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS IN FIELD. HATCHED AREAS ARE EXISTING TO REMAIN - WITH SOME MINOR MODIFICATIONS OR FINISH UPDATES K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS EXISTING MECHANICAL ROOM TO REMAIN ROOF ACCESS K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS 5' - 0 " K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS UP SHIPLADDER K-T14428-4PURISTFAUCETSBRASS ALTER EXISTING GUARDRAIL FOR ADA COMPLIANCE 5' - 0 " TEXTURED ADA BARS AT EVERY TOILET, SHOWER AND TUB OPEN TO BELOW 617 SF/1 BR UNIT 201 201 344 SF/1 BR UNIT 202 202 342 SF/1 BR UNIT 203 203 344 SF/1 BR UNIT 204 204 302 SF/STUDIO UNIT 205 205 428 SF/STUDIO UNIT 206 206 531 SF/1 BR UNIT 207 207 352 SF/STUDIO UNIT 208 208 395 SF/1 BR UNIT 209 209 414 SF/1 BR UNIT 210 210ATRIUM 211 CORRIDOR 212 STAIR A 110 STAIR B 115 ELEVATOR 111 95' EXIT PATH90' EXIT PATH 18'-10 5/8"12'-0"12'-0"12'-0"16'-3 7/8"18'-8 3/4" 33 ' - 7 3 / 8 " 30 ' - 7 3 / 8 " 13'-11 1/2"14'-1 3/8"14'-2 3/8"19'-8 1/2" 28 ' - 1 1 5 / 8 " 9' - 7 7 / 8 " 24 ' - 3 3 / 8 " 201A 201B 201C 201D 20 2 A 202B 202C 203B20 3 A 20 3 D 203C 20 4 A 204B 204C20 4 D 20 5 A 205B 20 5 C 206A 206B 20 6 C 20 7 A 207B 207C 20 7 D 20 8 A 208B 208C 20 9 A 209B 209C 20 9 D 21 0 A 210B 210D 21 0 E 210C SD SD/CO SD/CO SD SD SD/CO SD SD/CO SD SD/CO SD SD/CO SD SD/CO SD/CO SDSD SD/CO 10'-7 5/8"7'-8" 9' - 4 7 / 8 " 7'-7"10'-8 5/8" 15 ' - 8 3 / 4 " 5' - 4 7 / 8 " 9' - 1 0 " 5' - 0 " 7'-4 1/8" 2' - 6 " 2' - 6 " CENTERLINE BUILDING 10 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 8' - 6 1 / 4 " 12 ' - 1 3 / 8 " 6' - 0 " 17'-0 1/8" 8' - 4 " 6'-2" 17 ' - 1 3 / 8 " 6' - 7 " 20'-11 1/8" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 10 ' - 6 " 11 ' - 1 1 7 / 8 " 6' - 0 " 13 ' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 9' - 2 5 / 8 " 10 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 9' - 2 5 / 8 " 10 ' - 5 1 / 4 " 7' - 2 " 6' - 9 1 / 2 " 8' - 7 " A-102SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 N 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 2 9 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION DRAWING DIMENSIONS HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS IN FIELD. TUCK POINTING AS REQUIRED AT EXTERIOR ADA ACCESS AISLE SIGNAGE TO BE ON BUILDING PER CODE 502.4.4 NEW ADA SIGNAGE NEW ADA SIGNAGE NEW ENGINEERED CANOPY OVER MAILBOX - MATCH EXISTING NEW MAILBOX WITH PARCEL LOCKER - USPS APPROVED 4C (NATIONAL MAILBOXES H3915D-18 OR EQUAL) NEW SIGNAGE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT WEST ELEVATION 11'-7 1 2" SECOND FLOOR ELEVATION 22'-6" PERIMETER JOIST BRACING 0'-0" MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION 26'-2" TOP PARAPET WALL 31'-2" ROOF RIDGE ELEV NEW MAILBOX WITH PARCEL LOCKER - USPS APPROVED 4C (NATIONAL MAILBOXES H3915D-18 OR EQUAL) NEW SIGNAGE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT NEW ENGINEERED CANOPY OVER MAILBOX - MATCH EXISTING A-201EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 2 9 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 A-202EXTERIOR ELEVATION IMAGE1 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 2 9 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 EXISTING SIGN ABOVE FRONT DOOR IS 7-0"' HIGH AND 8'-9" WIDE ROOF DECK ON METAL JOISTS CONCRETE SLAB FLOOR WITH DROP CEILING 8' - 3 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " CONCRETE SLAB FLOOR WITH DROP CEILING TYPE IIIB WALL CONSTRUCTION TYPICAL A-301WALL SECTION 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 2 9 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 PARTITION GAP CLOSURE NOT TO SCALE 4 PERMANENT SEAT CONTROL END WALL 2'-4 1/4"5'-0"2'-3" 3' - 0 " HEAD END WALL BACK WALL 1'-3" 3' - 0 " 2' - 3 " 1'-0"TUB 5'-0"1'-6" 9'-7 1/4" 11 ' - 9 " 2' - 3 " 4' - 3 " 8' - 9 " ICC ANSI A117.1 607 BATHTUBS PERMANENT SEAT 607.5 LOCATION OF BATHTUB CONTROLS 1' - 5 " 3' - 0 " TILE FLOOR WITH COVE BASE QUARTZ COUNTER & BACKSPLASH TUBTUB2' - 1 0 " TILE SURROUNDTILE SURROUND BACK WALL GRAB BARS PER ICC ANSI A117.1 607.4.1.1 CONTROL END WALL HEAD END WALL HEAD END WALL ICC ANCI A117.1 607.4.2.3 SEAT 17"-19" ICC ANSI A117.1 FIG 610.2 SS DOOR PROTECTION 2' - 1 0 " 4' - 2 " TILE SURROUND CL T U B ICC ANCI A117.1 FIG 607.5 LOCATION OF BATHTUB CONTROLS CONTROL END WALL ICC ANCI A117.1 607.4.2.2 ICC ANCI A117.1 607.6 HAND SHOWER WITH VERTICAL GRAB BAR (MAX 48" FOR ALL CONTROLS) 2'-6" A-302 UNIT 107 ADA BATH PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 3 0 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 N UNIT 107 ADA BATH ELEVATIONS 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 CODE REQUIREMENTS NTS 3 2' - 1 0 " ADA COUNTER HEIGHT 24" LAUNDRY SINK 7' - 4 " 1' - 6 " MAPLE VENEER PLASTIC LAMINATE CABINETS - SELF CLOSING HARDWARE - 250 POUND HINGE SUPPORT 3' - 0 " W D W D W D W D A-303 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 3 0 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 LAUNDRY ROOM ELEVATIONS 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 CODE REQUIREMENTS 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 CODE REQUIREMENTS 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 ADA REF ADA RANGE SINK 2' - 1 0 " 1' - 6 " 4' - 0 " HOOD 8' - 4 " SHALLOW SINK ALL UPPER CABINETS TO HAVE CONTINUOUS PLUG MOULD AND LED LIGHTING 2' - 1 0 " REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE COVER AT SINK BASE 3' - 0 " ADA DW OPEN BELOW GFIC DUPLEX GFIC DUPLEX STRAIGHT ON ANGLEDANGLED A-304 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 3 0 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 UNIT 107 ADA KITCHEN ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 CODE REQUIREMENTS 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 A-501 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 3 0 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 WALL PARTITIONS NOT TO SCALE 1 A-502 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 3 0 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 FLOOR/CEILING STC/IIC EQUIVALENCY NOT TO SCALE 1 A-503 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 3 0 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 DOOR SCHEDULE NOT TO SCALE 1 114 D 3'-0" 7'-0" 6 PUSH PUSH/PULL HARDWARE NO LOCKING - SELF CLOSING 6 LAUNDRY ROOM A-504 7100 BROOKLN BOULEVARD REMODEL AR C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 61 2 . 2 3 7 . 0 1 0 8 ww w . d o m a i n a r c h . c o m do m a i n 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N BO U L E V A R D L L C 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 DWG N0. ISSUE DATE c DOMAIN 2023 Oc t 2 5 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 3 0 p m D : \ P \ O l a t a y o 7 1 0 0 B r o o k l y n B l v d \ C A D \ M o d e l \ A - F P . d w g AL L R E P O R T S , D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , C O M P U T E R F I L E S , F I E L D D A T A , N O T E S , A N D O T H E R D O C U M E N T S A N D I N S T R U M E N T S P R E P A R E D B Y D O M A I N A S I N S T R U M E N T S O F S E R V I C E S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F D O M A I N . D O M A I N SH A L L R E T A I N A L L C O M M O N L A W , S T A T U T O R Y A N D O T H E R R E S E R V E D R I G H T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E C O P Y R I G H T T H E R E T O . c DOMAIN 2023 LICENSE NO.ARCHITECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24341 REVIEW 2023 SEPT 9 PERMIT 2023 SEPT 11 RENAME 2023 OCT 9 PERMIT 2023 OCT 25 DOOR SCHEDULE NOT TO SCALE 1 LEGEND THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION DEPICTED IN THESE PLANS ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO CI/ASCE 38-02, "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA," LEVEL D STANDARDS. LEGEND D S 830 867.4 867.0 Cleanout fdc Hydrant Catch Basinrim=865.44 12" inv=861.42 inv=858.19S Sanitary Manholerim=866.74 FFE867.0866.9 867.0 867.2867.2 867.8 LightPole LightPole Column Column V ATM Machine 867.1 FlagPole Gate Valve SignSign Sign 866.8 866.7tcc867.23 tcc866.69 tcc866.50 tcc866.83 tcc867.12 tcc866.75 tcc866.85 tcc866.95 tcc867.01 tcc867.40 tcc867.56 tcc867.60 tcc867.67 tcc867.55 tcc867.61 tcc867.55 tcc867.15 tcc867.00 tcc866.90 tcc866.86 tcc866.32tcc866.39tcc866.79 tcc866.79 tcc866.71tcc866.68 tcc866.75 tcc866.86tcc866.81 tcc866.68 tcc866.75 tcc866.89 tcc866.47 tcc866.78 tcc866.58 tcc866.29 tcc866.01 tcc865.68 tcc865.71 tcc865.90 tcc866.03 tcc866.46 LightPole tcc864.98 E ElectricManholerim=865.43 865.7 865.9 C cped 867.5866.6 865.0 865.7 866.0 865.9865.2 tcc864.97 tcc865.20 Catch Basinrim=864.67 tcc865.57 865.6 tcc865.89 865.9 E ElectricManholerim=866.30 867.1 866.2 866.4 866.5 tcc866.61 tcc867.12 tcc867.09 tcc867.04 LightPole 867.0 tcc866.93 Ccped C cped LightPole 866.7 866.0 tcc866.78 tcc866.56 tcc866.18 tcc865.97Gate Valve 865.7 865.6 865.6 865.1 866.8865.6 14" 14865.6 tcc865.65 tcc865.54tcc865.09 tcc865.05 tcc865.66 865.1 864.9 864.8 Catch Basinrim=863.8612" inv=859.72 864.4 864.6 864.7 865.0 865.2 865.4865.6865.7866.1 tcc866.36 tcc866.22 tcc865.83tcc865.71 tcc866.23 tcc865.66 tcc865.42 LightPole Gate Valve 864.5 863.6 864.1 864.6 12""inv=857.67 8""inv=857.02 FES "inv=856.42 866.6 866.9 G GasMeter 867.0 866.9 866.7 866.4 866.6 866.3 866.5 866.6865.9 rf line893.2 865.5PowerPole 864.8 865.9865.7865.5867.4 PowerPoleGuyAnchor867.2 866.0 PowerPole 867.7 867.7 867.8 867.1 867.1856.5Drain WO856.8 866.7 866.2 866.0867.2 867.2 867.7 867.4 E Transformer 866.2 866.1 865.9 865.8 867.7867.7 868.1 868.6 868.5 867.8 tcc867.08 tcc866.99tcc866.87tcc866.63 tcc866.58 Gate Valve Gate Valve 866.3 866.1 Catch Basinrim=865.44 Catch Basinrim=865.42inv=862.39 inv=860.58inv=860.52 LightPole V Vault HydrantTransformer Transformer 867.7 Riser E Elec.Meter C cped 869.0 869.0 Transformer 868.6 866.1866.2866.6 FES "inv=853.64 Water Elevation854.36 inv=861.67 Hydranttnh=868.28 Hydranttnh=869.28 80.0 21 . 0 1.05 . 2 4. 3 4.7 36 . 1 95.1 49 . 921.2B i t u m i n o u s S u r f a c e 866 8 6 4 866868 868 20 . 6 20 . 6 Concrete Curb Concrete Curb C o n c r e t e C u r b O v e r h e a d W i r e s E n t r y F e n c e TrashEnclosure B R O O K L Y N B L V D . C o u n t y R o a d N o . 1 5 2 N 89°38'04" E 325.85 S 0 0 ° 2 1 ' 5 6 " E 1 6 4 . 9 8 S 89°38'04" W 202.42 6 0 . 8 6 1 3 . 0 6 N 3 7 ° 3 6 ' 4 7 " W N 3 6 ° 2 7 ' 0 9 " W 12 . 5 12 . 5 12.5 12.5 7. 5 7. 5 7. 5 7. 5 10 15 7. 5 7. 5 N 89°38'04" E 179.00 N 0 0 ° 2 1 ' 5 6 " W 8 2 . 0 8 S 89°46'53" W 99.62 N 89°38'04" E 32.00 N 44°27'05" E 43.1 3S 87°02'30" E 99.84 N 89°22'57" E 169.86 S 59 ° 2 8 ' 1 3 " E 1 9 5 . 8 6 N 84°03'58" W 95.2 9 S53°2 2 ' 4 4 " W 2 4 . 3 2 N 4 7 ° 2 8 ' 5 9 " W 5 8 . 6 9 5 55 5 12 . 5 12 . 5 84.0 Concrete Curb 1 7 . 0 0 N 51° 3 4 ' 1 0 " E 3 7 . 9 9 S 87°16'54" W 150.84 56 . 6 0 14.03 6" DIP 12" R C P 12.5 12.5 7.5 7.5 7. 5 7. 5 EXISTING2-STORY BRICK BUILDINGNo. 7100 1-STORY BRICK BUILDING"Boulevard Plaza" Generatoron conc. S i g n C o n c r e t e C o n c r e t e B i t u m i n o u s F e n c e C o n c r e t e L = 1 3 2 . 1 3 R = 6 5 2 3 . 9 4 = 0 1 ° 0 9 ' 3 8 " DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENt ROADWAY EASEMENTPER DOC. No. 5122814 DRAI N A G E & U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T P E R P L A T SEE M I S C . N O T E # 8 F O R P O S S I B L E EXCE P T I O N T O I T S L O C A T I O N DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT PER PLAT DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT wall w/railing steps 3' EASEMENT FOR PARKING LOTPURPOSES PER DOC. No. 5268706 RO A D W A Y E A S E M E N T PE R D O C . N o . 5 1 2 2 8 1 4 UTILITY ACCESS EASEMENT R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E P E R D O C . N o . 8 6 6 0 1 2 7 354 355 356 357 358 359 362 361 360 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 Light Light Light L i g h t Light Light Li g h t Li g h t Li g h t Light LEGEND Cleanout fdc Hydrant Catch Basinrim=865.44 12" inv=861.42 inv=858.19S Sanitary Manholerim=866.74 LightPole LightPole Gate Valve LightPole E ElectricManholerim=865.43 C cped Catch Basinrim=864.67 E ElectricManholerim=866.30 LightPole Ccped C cped LightPole Gate Valve 14" 14865.6 Catch Basinrim=863.8612" inv=859.72 LightPole Gate Valve 12""inv=857.67 8""inv=857.02 FES "inv=856.42 G GasMeter PowerPole PowerPoleGuyAnchor PowerPole 867.8 Drain E Transformer Gate Valve Gate Valve Catch Basinrim=865.44 Catch Basinrim=865.42inv=862.39 inv=860.58inv=860.52 LightPole V Vault HydrantTransformer TransformerRiser E Elec.Meter C cped Transformer FES "inv=853.64 Water Elevation854.36 inv=861.67 Hydranttnh=868.28 Hydranttnh=869.28 80.0 21 . 0 1.05 . 2 4. 3 4.7 36 . 1 95.1 49 . 921.220 . 6 20 . 6 O v e r h e a d W i r e s E n t r y B R O O K L Y N B L V D . C o u n t y R o a d N o . 1 5 2 N 89°38'04" E 325.85 S 0 0 ° 2 1 ' 5 6 " E 1 6 4 . 9 8 S 89°38'04" W 202.42 6 0 . 8 6 1 3 . 0 6 N 3 7 ° 3 6 ' 4 7 " W N 3 6 ° 2 7 ' 0 9 " W 84.0 6" DIP 12" R C P EXISTING2-STORY BRICK BUILDINGNo. 7100 1-STORY BRICK BUILDING"Boulevard Plaza" Generatoron conc. S i g n C o n c r e t e C o n c r e t e F e n c e L = 1 3 2 . 1 3 R = 6 5 2 3 . 9 4 = 0 1 ° 0 9 ' 3 8 " wall w/railing steps R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E P E R D O C . N o . 8 6 6 0 1 2 7 354 355 359 362 361 363 364 365 366 367 368 370 Light Light Light L i g h t Light Light Li g h t Li g h t Li g h t Light V I S I T O R S 101 101 102 102 103 103 104 104 105 105 202202 201203203204204205205206206207207208208209209210210 10 6 10 7 10 7 20 1 10 6 V V VV V V V V V V V V V V V BI K E S NO P A R K I N G SITE DATA: 830 LEGEND ►► 830 864.9 864.8 tcc866.22 tcc865.83 tcc865.71 866.6 G GasMeter 866.7 866.2 866.0866 Catch Basinrim=863.8612""INV=859.72 LightPole G GasMeter FFE867.0 SignSign Sign 866.2 867.1 867.1 867.0 867.0 867.0 867.0 867.2 Cleanout fdc Hydrant 866.9 866.9 SignSign Sign 866.7 866.8 866.8 tcc866.86 tcc866.32 tcc866.39 tcc866.79 tcc866.79tcc866.68 tcc866.71 tcc866.68 tcc866.75 tcc866.75 tcc866.84 tcc866.86 tcc866.86 tcc tcc866.70 tcc866.75 tcc866.89 tcc866.81 tcc866.47 tcc866.40 tcc866.78 866.8 866.9 866.9 SignSign Sign E ElectricManholerim=865.43 E ElectricManholerim=866.30 14" 14865.6 867.8 Drain E Elec.Meter 80.0 21 . 0 1.05 . 2 4. 3 4.7 36 . 1 95.1 49 . 9 2 1 . 2 E n t r y B R O O K L Y N B L V D . C o u n t y R o a d N o . 1 5 2 6" DIP EXISTING2-STORY BRICK BUILDINGNo. 7100 1-STORY BRICK BUILDING"Boulevard Plaza" S i g n 354 355 359 362 361 363 364 365 366 367 368 370 SU- 3 0 - S i n g l e U n i t T r u c k SU- 3 0 - S i n g l e U n i t T r u c k SU- 3 0 - S i n g l e U n i t T r u c k FIELD TREE INVENTORY LOG PROJECT NAME: Tree Inventory at 7100 Brooklyn Blvd, Brooklyn Center DATE: 8/25/2023 Lot Condition: Developed TIME: 10:30 AM Sunny 80 Degrees F. TAG NO. TREE DIA. (IN) SPECIES CONDITION NOTES 354 6 Black Hills Spruce Good 355 43 Cottonwood Fair 356 14 Green Ash Poor EAB 357 15 Green Ash Poor EAB 358 13 Green Ash Poor EAB 359 22 Siberian Elm Fair 360 9 Green Ash Poor EAB 361 19 Siberian Elm Fair 362 13 Siberian Elm Fair 363 8 Hackberry Poor 364 7 Siberian Elm Poor 365 8 Hackberry Poor 366 14 Siberian Elm Poor 2 Trunks: 11,14 367 7 Hackberry Poor 368 8 Siberian Elm Poor 369 8 Green Ash Poor EAB 370 10 Honey Locust Good 17 224 TOTAL INCHES INVENTORIED NO. OF TREES TAGGED Page 1 of 1 Da t e : 1 0 / 2 5 / 2 0 2 3 DISCLAIMER: Based on the information provided, all dimensions and luminaire locations shown represent recommended positions. Actual performance of any manufacturer's luminaires may vary due to changes in electrical voltage, tolerance in LEDs and other variable field conditions. Calculations do not include obstructions such as buildings, curbs, landscaping or any other architectural elements unless noted. Fixture nomenclature to be finalized by engineer and/or architect. This drawings is for photometric evaluation purposes only and should not be used as a construction document or as a final document for ordering product. De s i g n e d B y : K . T o m c z a k 71 0 0 B r o o k l y n B L V D Pl y m o u t h , M N Ch e c k e d B y : M i k e N e s d i l l Sc a l e : 1 " = 2 0 ' Lighting Ordinance: - 20' Max Pole Height - .2fc min, 4fc max point, 20:1 Uniformity - 1fc max property line spill Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Mounting Calculation Summary Project: CALCULATIONS Height Lum. Watts LLF Description Label Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Parking Lot9WP110, 14 34.3 0.900 LPW-16-30-NW-G3-3-2021(CONFIRM COLOR TEMP) Fc 1.63 4.0 0.3 5 P1 20 63.59 0.900 OPF-S-A03-740-T4M-HIS 5.43 13.33 S E C E C C G E V E C Drain 867.5866.6 867.1 866.7 866.0 865.7 865.6 865.6 865.1 865.6 864.5 863.6 864.1 864.6 864.8 866.7 866.2 866.0867.2 867.2 868.6 866.1866.2866.6 865.614" 14 866.9 867.0 867.2867.2 867.8 867.1 866.8 866.7 865.7 865.9 865.0 865.7 866.0 865.9865.2 865.6 865.9 866.2 866.4 867.0 866.9 866.7 866.4 866.6 866.3 866.5 866.6 865.9 867.7 867.7 867.1 867.1856.5867.7 867.4 867.7867.7 868.1 868.6 868.5 867.8 866.3 866.1 867.7 869.0 869.0 Light Light Light Lig ht Light Light Li g h t Li g h t Li g h t Light Cleanout 12" inv=861.42 inv=858.19 Pole Light Pole Light PoleLight cped PoleLight cped cped PoleLight 12" inv=859.72 Pole Light inv=857.6712"" inv=857.02 8"" PolePowerPole Power Anchor Guy PolePower Transformer inv=862.39 inv=860.58inv=860.52 Pole Light Vault Transformer TransformerRiser cped Transformer inv=861.67 865.5865.9865.7865.5867.4867.2 866.0 Hydrant Hydrant 854.36 Water Elevation 1658 L O T 2 L O T 1 867.8 inv=856.42FES " inv=853.64FES " rim=866.74Sanitary Manhole rim=865.43ManholeElectric rim=866.30ManholeElectric MeterElec. fdc Gate Valve Gate Valve Gate Valve Gate Valve Gate Valve tnh=868.28Hydrant tnh=869.28Hydrant MeterGas C o n c r e t e C o n c r e t e C o n c r e t e wall w/railing steps N 89%%d38'04" E 325.85 S 00 % %D21 ' 56 " E 16 4 . 98 S 89%%d38'04" W 202.42 6 0 . 8 6 1 3 . 0 6 N 3 7 % % D 3 6 ' 4 7 " W N 3 6 % % D 2 7 ' 0 9 " W = 0 1 ° 0 9 ' 3 8 " DL = 1 3 2 . 1 3 R = 6 5 2 3 . 9 4 R I G H T O F W A Y L I N E P E R D O C . N o . 8 6 6 0 1 2 7 SignSign Sign 6" DIP B R O O K L Y N B L V D . C o u n t y R o a d N o . 1 5 2 on conc. Generator B i t u m i n o u s S u r f a c e B i t u m i n o u s S i g n Concrete Curb Concrete Curb C o n c r e t e C u r b Concrete Curb O v e r h e a d W i r e s F e n c e 354 355 356 357 358 359 362 361 360 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 5ft 5ft 5ft P1 MH: 20 P1 MH: 20 MH: 20 P1 P1 MH: 20 MH: 20 P1 WP1 MH: 10 WP1 MH: 10 MH: 10 WP1 MH: 10 WP1 WP1 MH: 10 WP1 MH: 10 WP1 MH: 14 MH: 14 WP1 WP1 MH: 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.3 2.3 3.4 3.7 3.3 2.2 1.2 0.7 0.7 1.2 2.2 3.3 3.7 3.3 2.3 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.5 3.2 2.5 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.5 3.2 2.5 1.8 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.4 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.7 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.6 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.3 3.0 2.0 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 3.7 3.4 2.3 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 2.2 3.8 3.6 2.1 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.5 2.3 1.7 1.3 2.0 3.0 2.8 1.8 1.3 0.9 2.5 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.9 2.4 2.7 2.3 1.6 1.1 1.5 2.8 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.6 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.0 1.6 1.8 1.6 1.2 1.0 2.3 3.4 1.2 1.7 2.3 2.7 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.1 2.7 3.6 1.4 2.0 3.2 3.8 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 2.3 3.7 1.4 2.2 3.7 4.0 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.7 2.0 3.4 1.3 1.8 2.8 3.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.2 1.7 2.2 2.5 2.1 1.6 1.1 0.7 1.7 3.0 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.5 2.4 3.3 3.8 3.0 2.0 1.2 0.7 1.3 2.6 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.3 2.5 3.5 3.6 3.2 1.9 1.0 0.5 1.1 1.9 6.2 2.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.9 1.3 1.3 2.4 3.2 2.4 1.6 1.6 2.2 3.4 2.9 1.6 2.8 1.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.9 1.4 1.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.9 2.5 3.1 3.3 3.1 2.6 1.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.9 3.6 4.5 4.8 4.1 3.3 2.5 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.8 3.0 3.8 3.5 2.5 3.3 4.0 4.6 4.9 4.2 2.8 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.6 2.2 3.1 4.1 5.1 5.6 4.7 3.7 2.6 1.9 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.7 4.7 5.7 4.8 3.9 5.1 6.0 7.1 7.3 5.6 7.8 8.2 6.4 5.3 7.0 8.5 9.9 10.1 11.0 11.1 7.7 6.7 8.8 9.8 9.5 10.5 10.6 8.1 8.1 10.7 10.6 8.1 9.1 7.3 9.2 12.3 7.1 8.5 7.0 8.6 9.9 8.8 9.4 7.5 6.3 7.7 11.2 11.1 8.1 5.3 5.7 10.6 10.4 7.8 4.8 5.0 7.2 7.8 6.5 5.2 5.5 4.4 5.7 5.2 6.1 7.3 3.1 4.5 4.5 7.3 9.5 2.9 4.3 4.3 7.3 10.3 3.6 4.9 4.5 5.8 7.5 5.7 6.6 5.4 4.1 4.8 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 7100 BROOKLY N BOULEVARD, LLC 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard Brooklyn Center, Minnesota September 12, 2023 Prepared By: Demarc Land Surveying & Engineering 7601 73rd Avenue North Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55428 763.560.3093 I hereby certify that this Plan, Specification or Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Prepared For: 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard, LLC 10230 28th Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 Jeffrey A Prasch, PE Project Engineer 09.12.2023 Date 52706 License Number Stormwater Management Plan 7100 Brooklyn Blvd – Brooklyn Center, MN September 12, 2023 i Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................. i 1.0 Project Overview ....................................................................................................................... ii 2.0 Design Considerations ............................................................................................................. ii 3.0 Impervious Area ........................................................................................................................ ii Table 3.1 – Impervious Area Calculations ........................................................................ ii Appendix A – Figures Figure 1 – Drainage Areas Existing Conditions Figure 2 – Drainage Areas Proposed Conditions Stormwater Management Plan 7100 Brooklyn Blvd – Brooklyn Center, MN September 12, 2023 ii 1.0 Project Overview A building remodel is proposed at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. The site is 1.00 acres. The site is currently occupied by a building and vehicle parking lot. There are commercial properties to the south and residences to the north of the property. The lot to the east contains a stormwater pond. Currently, the majority of the stormwater on-site drains via surface flow to a catch basin at the northeast corner of the parking lot and then outlets to the pond to the east. A portion of the site drains via surface flow to a catch basin at the northwest corner of the parking lot which outlets to storm sewer in the street. A small portion of the site drains directly to the adjacent properties to the north and a small portion of the site drains directly to the street. The existing drainage conditions are shown in Figure 1. The proposed improvements include a larger trash enclosure and additional sidewalk. The existing trash enclosure and a portion of the existing parking near the northeast corner of the lot will be removed for the new trash enclosure, which will result in less overall impervious area for the site. The proposed drainage pattern of the site will remain the same. Figure 2 shows the proposed drainage conditions. 2.0 Design Considerations The City of Brooklyn Center (City) and the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission (SCWMC) dictate the rate, volume, and water quality requirements for this site. Since this is a redevelopment project resulting in less proposed impervious area than existing conditions, the City and SCWMC requirements are met. See Table 3.1 below for impervious area calculations. 3.0 Impervious Area Table 3.1 – Impervious Area Calculations Discharge Point Existing (sf) Proposed (sf) CB East 24,183 24,021 CB West 7,674 7,634 North Property 186 186 Street 1,029 1,029 Total 33,072 32,870 As shown in the table above, the proposed impervious area is less than the existing impervious area. Appendix A Figures Cleanout fdc Hydrant Catch Basinrim=865.4412" inv=861.42 inv=858.19S Sanitary Manholerim=866.74 LightPole LightPole Column ColumnVATM Machine FlagPole Gate Valve SignSign Sign tcc866.75 tcc866.85 tcc866.95 tcc867.01 tcc867.40 tcc867.56 tcc867.60 tcc867.67 tcc867.55 tcc867.61 tcc867.55 tcc867.15 tcc867.00 tcc866.90 tcc866.86tcc866.32tcc866.39tcc866.79tcc866.79tcc866.71tcc866.68 tcc866.75tcc866.86tcc866.81 tcc866.68 tcc866.75 tcc866.89tcc866.47tcc866.78 tcc866.58 tcc866.29tcc866.01 tcc865.68 tcc865.71 tcc865.90 tcc866.03 tcc866.46 LightPole tcc864.98E ElectricManholerim=865.43 Ccped tcc864.97 tcc865.20 Catch Basinrim=864.67 tcc865.57 tcc865.89 E ElectricManholerim=866.30 tcc866.61 tcc867.12 tcc867.09 tcc867.04 LightPole tcc866.93 CcpedCcped LightPole tcc866.78 tcc866.56 tcc866.18 tcc865.97Gate Valve 14" 14865.6 tcc865.65 tcc865.54tcc865.09 tcc865.05 tcc865.66 Catch Basinrim=863.8612" inv=859.72tcc866.36 tcc866.22tcc865.83tcc865.71 LightPole Gate Valve 12""inv=857.67 8""inv=857.02 G GasMeter PowerPole PowerPoleGuyAnchor PowerPole 867.8DrainETransformer tcc867.08 tcc866.99tcc866.87tcc866.63 tcc866.58 Gate Valve Gate Valve Catch Basinrim=865.44inv=860.58inv=860.52 LightPole VVault HydrantTransformer TransformerRiser E Elec.Meter Ccped Transformer inv=861.67 Hydranttnh=868.28 Hydranttnh=869.28 80.0 21 . 0 1.05 . 2 4. 3 4.7 36 . 1 95.1 49 . 9 2 1 . 2 866 8 6 4 866868 868 20 . 6 20 . 6 Concrete Curb Concrete Curb C o n c r e t e C u r b E n t r y B R O O K L Y N B L V D . C o u n t y R o a d N o . 1 5 2 84.0 Concrete Curb 2-STORY BRICK BUILDINGNo. 7100 1-STORY BRICK BUILDING"Boulevard Plaza" Generatoron conc. S i g n 354 355 356 357 358 359 362 361 360 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 Light Light Light L i g h t Light Light Li g h t Li g h t Li g h t Light LEGEND DRAINAGE ARROW Cleanout fdc Hydrant Catch Basinrim=865.4412" inv=861.42 inv=858.19S Sanitary Manholerim=866.74 LightPole LightPole Gate Valve tcc866.75 tcc866.85 tcc866.95 tcc867.01 tcc867.40 tcc867.56 tcc867.60 tcc867.67 tcc867.55 tcc867.61 tcc867.55 tcc867.15 tcc867.00 tcc866.90 tcc866.86tcc866.32tcc866.39tcc866.79tcc866.79tcc866.71tcc866.68 tcc866.75tcc866.86tcc866.81 tcc866.68 tcc866.75 tcc866.89tcc866.47tcc866.78 tcc866.58 tcc866.29tcc866.01 tcc865.68 tcc865.71 tcc865.90 tcc866.03 tcc866.46 LightPole tcc864.98E ElectricManholerim=865.43 Ccped tcc864.97 tcc865.20 Catch Basinrim=864.67 tcc865.57 tcc865.89 E ElectricManholerim=866.30 tcc866.61 tcc867.12 tcc867.09 tcc867.04 LightPole tcc866.93 CcpedCcped LightPole tcc866.78 tcc866.56 tcc866.18 tcc865.97Gate Valve 14" 14865.6 tcc865.65 tcc865.54tcc865.09 tcc865.05 tcc865.66 Catch Basinrim=863.8612" inv=859.72tcc866.36 tcc866.22tcc865.83tcc865.71 LightPole Gate Valve 12""inv=857.67 8""inv=857.02 G GasMeter PowerPole PowerPoleGuyAnchor PowerPole 867.8DrainETransformer tcc867.08 tcc866.99tcc866.87tcc866.63 tcc866.58 Gate Valve Gate Valve Catch Basinrim=865.44inv=860.58inv=860.52 LightPole VVault HydrantTransformer TransformerRiser E Elec.Meter Ccped Transformer inv=861.67 Hydranttnh=868.28 Hydranttnh=869.28 80.0 21 . 0 1.05 . 2 4. 3 4.7 36 . 1 95.1 49 . 921.2866 8 6 4 866868 868 E n t r y B R O O K L Y N B L V D . C o u n t y R o a d N o . 1 5 2 6" DIP 12" R C P 2-STORY BRICK BUILDINGNo. 7100 1-STORY BRICK BUILDING"Boulevard Plaza" Generatoron conc. S i g n 354 355 356 357 358 359 362 361 360 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 Light Light Light L i g h t Light Light Li g h t Li g h t Li g h t Light LEGEND DRAINAGE ARROW Exhibit B Exhibit C M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 4, 2023 TO: Ginny McIntosh, City Planner/Zoning Administrator FROM: James Soltis, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Public Works – 7100 Brooklyn Blvd Development Site Plan Review Public Works staff reviewed the following documents submitted for review for the proposed 7100 Brooklyn Blvd development. Architectural Plans (091123-Permit) Civil Plans (091223-Preliminary) Survey (081023) Photometric Plans (061523-Rev 1) Landscape Plans (091123-Preliminary) Stormwater Management Plans (091123) Subject to final staff approval, the referenced plans must be revised in accordance with the following comments/revisions and approved prior to issuance of any permits. Plan Items L-100 1.Per MN Administrative Rules 1341.0502 A117.1 Section 502, Parking Spaces identification signage can not be more then 96 inches from center head of an accessible space. Plan note indicates signage to be mounted on building which appears to be further then 96 inches. Correct or remove note. 2.Parking layout and number of provided parking spots do not match Civil Plans (091223- Preliminary). Revise to match and correct provided parking numbers. C-5 Grading Details 3.Proposed sidewalk grading does not meet ADA. Please revise per 2020 Minnesota Accessibility Code Section 406 indicating designated landings and ramps including dimensions and slopes. If existing signage is to be replaced please include details for signage and placement. General Items 4.The final construction plans must be certified by a licensed engineer in the state of Minnesota and forwarded to the City Engineer for approval. 5.Inspection for the private site improvements must be performed by the developer’s design/project engineer. Upon project completion, the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Exhibit D design/project engineer’s immediate and direct supervision. The engineer must be certified in the state of Minnesota and must certify all required as-built drawings. 6. C4-Site Plan indicates a disturbance area of 0.05 acres with a proposed reduction in impervious area. As the disturbed areas falls below the City and Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission threshold of 0.5 acres of disturbance no stormwater management review is required. Anticipated Permitting 7. As the indicated disturbance falls below 10,000 sf this project does not trigger a City Land Disturbance Permit. 8. If applicable, applicant will need to obtain required permits to work in County right-of-way. 9. Other permits not listed herein may be required. It is the Responsibility of the applicant to obtain such permits as warranted. All aforementioned items, comments and recommendations are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. The site plan must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the referenced plans, unless modified by the staff recommended conditions above. Subsequent approval of the final plan may require additional modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of the water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, final grading, geometric design and other design elements as established by the City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3300 | www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org Community Development 763-569-3330 October 9, 2023 7100 Brooklyn Blvd Building review comments for newly proposed apartment building to be located at 7100 Brooklyn Blvd. 1.Prior to a Building permit being issued. A SAC determination for the new building will need to be done by MET Council and SAC determination letter received. 2. Separate permits and signed plans required for Building, Mechanical, Plumbing & Electrical. A Fire sprinkler and Fire alarm permit with plans is required to be submitted to the Building Department for this building review. The Community Development department must be contacted on all proposed signage for this building. Permits are required for all exterior signage. 3.The building will be required to have a sprinkler system installed if not already installed. City of Brooklyn Center zoning ordinance 3-101 B. (2) as adopted by the Minnesota State Building code 1306 Special Fire Protection system 1306.0020 Subp. 2, Existing and New buildings. 4.Hennepin County Health Department shall approve the kitchen area located in the basement prior to any City permits being issued. 5.All plumbing plans shall be reviewed by the Department of Labor and Industry Plumbing Department. All submitted documents shall be signed as required by Minnesota state statues. 6. Building plans to be submitted to the City Building Department for review. If any items need to be addressed, comments will be provided in a plan review letter addressed to the architect of record. Sincerely, Dan Grinsteinner Building Official City of Brooklyn Center 763-569-3313 Exhibit E Exhibit F 1 Ginny McIntosh From: Sent:Wednesday, October 11, 2023 2:50 PM To:Ginny McIntosh Subject:Planning Commission 27-119-21-33-0097 7200 Brooklyn Blvd Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 From: Brooklyn United Methodist Church 12 Oct 2023 To: Ginny McIntosh City Planner and Zoning Administrator Brooklyn Center Planning Commission Subject; Multi Family Housing PID: 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center MN 55429 | 27-119-21-33-0097 Brooklyn United Methodist Church (BUMC) has a vested interest it the housing proposal because our parking lot abuts the property in question. The parking lot already has a lot of extraneous, unauthorized use. We are concerned that converting this property could increase overflow parking by residents and visitors. Is there adequate parking space available on the property for the expected occupancy? BUMC would be willing to have a discussion on the lease or sale of a section of our parking lot. Safety is a grave concern. With increased movement in and out of the housing area, and Brooklyn Blvd. being a very busy street, has the City considered increased accident potential. In conjunction with safety, will the City see a need for any additional streetlights in this area? 2 If approved, we request that the developer construct a privacy fence between the two properties. Our BUMC board of trustees would expect to be involved in the design and placement of this fence. Thank you, Tom Foster Trustee Chair officeadm@bumc.org BUMC Office Administrator email 1 Ginny McIntosh From: Sent:Friday, October 13, 2023 10:27 AM To:Ginny McIntosh Subject:7100 Brooklyn Blvd Multi-Housing proposal Hello Ginny, Diane and I were surprised with the disapproval of the proposal. We understand that it can move forward to the City Counsel. Are there steps they will be required to take prior to presenting to the City Counsel? Since the Chair recommended that a fence would be in the best interest of both parties, will it go forward as a requirement or just a recommendation? I'd surmise that the owners will want to continue pursing approval. Will we be notified if and when this will be presented? We want to make sure our request for a privacy fence stays in the package. Thank you, Tom Foster BUMC Trustee Chair C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:11/13/2023 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :J esse A nders on, C ommunity D evelopment D irector BY:X iong Thao, H ous ing and Community S tandard S upervis or S U B J E C T:Follow Up from S pecial A sses s ment H earing for P ropos ed S pecial A sses s ments for A dminis tra0ve F ines /C ita0on Costs Requested Council A con: - M oon to appr ove a resoluon r educing the cerfied special assessments for certain properes for administrave fines and citaon cost from the H ennepin C ounty Tax Rolls B ackground: At the City Council M ee0ng on O ctober 23, 2023, tw o proper0es appealed the A dministra0ve F ines/Cita0on C os ts during the S pecial A sses s ment H earing. City Council as ked staff to bring back informa0on regarding the proper0es to the November 13, 2023 City Council mee0ng. P roper0es 5936 F remont Ave N and 5520 James Ave N appealed and a8ached are the s ummaries for both proper0es. S taff is recommending that the amount of the A dminis tra0ve F ines /C ita0on Costs be reduced. There are s eparate reas ons for decreasing the A dminis tra0ve F ines /C ita0ons . The reasons are outlined in the s ummary for each property. I f the City Council would prefer to not reduce the cita0ons, no ac0on is needed. I f the City Council prefers to adjust the amount of the reduc0on, the res olu0on can be amended with the mo0on to approve. B udget I ssues: The fees for these s pecial asses s ments help recover s ome of the C ity costs as s ociated w ith providing a s ervice s pecific to a property. A dministra0ve fines occur w here voluntary compliance is not achieved and addi0onal staff 0me is required to gain compliance. I nclusive C ommunity Engagement: A nracist/Equity Policy Effect: S trategic Priories and Values: S afe, S ecure, S table C ommunity AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip0on U pload D ate Type Res olu0on 11/7/2023 Resolu0on Le8er C ode Enforcement S ummary 11/7/2023 Backup M aterial Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REDUCING THE CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE FINES AND CITATION COST FROM THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has caused Administrative Fines/Citation costs for certain properties within the City from September 16, 2022 thru September 16, 2023 under the authority of City Ordinance Section 18 -204 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 429; and WHEREAS, on October 23, 2023, City Council had a public hearing for unpaid Administrative Fines/Citations, approved the special assessment, and heard two appeals; and WHEREAS, City Ordinance Section 18-210 and Minnesota State Statute authorizes the certification of certain delinquent Administrative Fines/Citation accounts to the County tax rolls for collection; and WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passe d upon all objections to the proposed assessment for Administrative Fines/Citation costs. WHEREAS, staff reviewed the history of the two properties that appealed on October 23, 2023, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The amount of $4,000.00 will be removed from 5936 Fremont Ave N and impose $2,100.00 to the County tax rolls. 2. The amount of $6,000.00 will be removed from 5520 James Ave N and impose $3,000.00 to the County tax rolls RESOLUTION NO. _____________ November 13, 2023 ________________________________ Date Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________________ City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Property Number 1 Address: 5936 Fremont Ave N Owner: Cody Lafleur & Alexis Moore Appellant’s Statement: Appellant’s mother, Carol Lafleur, spoke on his behalf stating that they hired a property manager to manage the property. They were not aware that the property manager did not obtain a rental license until they saw the special assessment notice and called the City. Findings: During a proactive property code enforcement inspection on August 18, 2022, staff found junk/debris and furniture on the curb, which appeared that someone had just moved out of the property. Staff went to the property and att empted to talk to someone about the junk/debis and furniture on the curb. Staff found the property vacant. A renting without a license compliance notice was sent to owner. A follow up inspection was completed and the property appeared to be occupied. A second compliance notice was sent to the owner. The property was then posted as an unlicensed rental property. After several inspections and talking with the tenant, staff issued a $300.00 Administrative Citation for operating without a rental license . Staff continued to issue additional Administrative Citations of $600, $1200, and $2000 upon finding the property continued to remain occupied. The compliance notices were returned to the City as undeliverable and the unlicensed rental posting on the door was removed. A recent inspection was completed and the property is still occupied. Staff spoke with the property owner and confirmed that the property has been managed by a real estate agent since October 2021. Staff talked to the property manager regarding the rental license requirement and confirmed that the property has been occupied as a rental property since 2021. The property manager has stated that the current tenant has put a notice to vacate for January 31, 2024. In the meantime, a rental license will be obtained for the property. An email was sent to the property owners and property manager to complete the rental license application. Recommendation: Administrative Citations for renting without a license was issued after finding the property occupied and sending several compliance notices. The Administrative Citations were issued according to the city policies for operating without a license and they were not appealed by the property owner or property manager. The property owner notified city staff af ter receiving the special assessmenet notice and informed staff that they had a property manager that is managing the property. The property owner is responsible for the Administrative Citations, however, the property owner worked quickly to start the rental license application process. Staff is recommending that amount of $4,000.00 be dismissed and the owner completes the rental license application before December 1, 2023. If the rental license application is not completed by December 1, 2023 the City may continue to issue Administrative Citations for operating a rental property without a license. The total amount to be specially assessed is $2,100.00 plus the Certification fee of $40 to the property tax rolls. Violation Type Dates Action Fees Operating rental dwelling without a license 08/18/2022 A routine code enforcement inspection was conducted and found trash/debris and furniture on the curb. Staff knocked on the door and found the property vacant. A compliance notice was sent to the property owner to submit a rental license application. 09/06/2022 During a routine code enforcement inspection the property was cited for tall grass and weeds. Staff spoke to the property occupant about the tall grass violation. Verbal orders were given to mow the lawn. 09/07/2022 The compliance notice mailed on August 18, 2022 (renting without a license notice) was returned to the City as undeliverable and was not able to be forwarded to a current address. 09/12/2022 A follow up inspection was completed for tall grass and weeds and the property was in compliance. 09/14/2022 A follow up inspection was conducted and found the property is occupied. A second compliance notice was sent to the owner to submit a rental license application. 10/05/2022 A third inspection was conducted and staff spoke to an occupant. Staff explained to the occupant that the property is not licensed as a rental property. Staff posted the property as an unlicensed rental property and gave the occupant a business card to have the leaseholder call the City. A $300 Administrative Citation was issued for operating a rental property without a license. $300 10/06/2022 The compliance notice dated September 14, 2022 (renting without a license) was returned to the City as undeliverable and unable to be forwarded. 10/21/2022 A fourth inspection was conducted and the property appeared to still be occupied. Staff knocked on the door but no one answered the door. A $600 Administrative Citation was issued for operating a rental property without a license. $600 11/02/2022 Administrative Citation dated October 5, 2022 was returned to the City as undeliverable. 11/04/2022 A fifth inspection was conducted and the property appeared to be occupied. Staff attempted to talk to someone but no one answered the door. A $1200 Administrative Citation was issued for operating a rental property without a license. $1200 11/18/2022 A sixth inspection was conducted and the property appeared to be occupied. Staff knocked on the door but no one answered the door. A $2000 Administrative Citation was issued for operating a rental property without a license. $2000 12/08/2022 Administrative Citations dated October 21, November 4, and November 8 was returned to the city. 12/22/2022 A seventh inspection was conducted and the property appeared to be occupied. Staff knocked on the door but no one answered the door. A $2000 Administrative Citation was issued for operating a rental property without a license. $2000 12/27/2022 The Administrative Citation issued on December 22, 2022 was returned to the City as undeliverable. 05/22/2023 During a routing code enforcement inspection the property had trash bins that were left at the curb. A compliance notice was posted on the door and mailed. 05/25/2023 A follow up inspection was completed for the trash at the curb violation and the property was in compliance. 06/05/2023 During a routine code enforcement inspection the property was cited for tall grass and weeds and trash bin left at the curb. A compliance notice was posted on the door and mailed. 06/14/2023 A follow up inspection was completed and found the property still in violation for tall grass and weeds. 06/23/2023 A follow up inspection was completed and found the property was in compliance. Property Number 2 Address: 5520 James Ave N Owner: Matthew Gildemeister Appellant’s Statement: Mr. Gildemeister stated that the other occupants in his home left their inoperable vehicle at the property and he was not able to get the vehicle towed. He also stated that due to the overwhelming amount of advertising mail, he did not open his mailbox. He further stated that due to his financial situation, he is not able to pay the citation amounts. Findings: There have been several property code violations each year since 2018 due to complaints and proactive code enforcement actions. In the past, the City has met with Mr. Gildemesiter to discuss the code violations and an action plan prior to issuing Administrative Citations. Several Administrative Citations have been issued due to ongoing property code violations and lack of effort to work towards compliance. The Administrative Citations were not appealed by Mr. Gildemeister and have been specially assessed to the property tax rolls. The city received a complaint about the property conditions and staff completed an inspection of the property. During the inspections, staff noted several property code violations and spoke with Mr. Gildemeister about the property code violations. After several compliance notices and several conversations with Mr. Gildemeister about a plan, there was little to no improvement on addressing the property code violations. After several inspections and conversations with Mr. Gildemeister, Administrative Citations were issued totaling $9,000 for several property code violations. The Administrative Citations were not appealed Recommendation: After several attempts to work with Mr. Gildemeister on compliance with city ordinance, the property remained in violation. Legal notification requirements were followed in issuing notices and Administrative Citations. The Administrative Citations were issued according to the city policies and they were not appealed by the property owner. Staff is recommending that the amount of $6,000 be dismissed. The property has remained in compliance and maintained by the property owner. The amount to b impose is $3,000.00 plus the Certification fees of $40 be specially assessed to the property tax rolls. Violation Type Dates Action Fees 06/13/2022 The city received a complaint about the property conditions. The complainant stated that there were several broken down vehicles in the driveway, a broken down camper, and a fallen tree on the property. Accumulation of Junk/furniture; Illegal storage of vehicles; Inoperable vehicles; dead/diseased tree; accessory building 06/14/2022 An initial inspection was completed and found the property with several property code violations. Staff knocked on the door and no one came to the door. A compliance notice was posted to the door and sent. - Garage door: Garage overhead door is broken and not able to close. - Accumulation of Junk/furniture: Remove sofa, tote bins, and tires in the driveway. Remove windows, scrap metal, a/c units, cardboard boxes, extension cords, and miscellaneous items from the back yard. - Inoperable vehicle: Black truck, Maroon Saturn, and Red Dodge truck all have expired tabs. - Dead/diseased tree: Remove fallen spruce tree in front yard. - Storage of vehicle: Remove trailer parked on the grass in the front yard. 06/23/2022 A follow up inspection was done for the rubbish and parking on the grass violation. Staff spoke with Mr. Gildemeister and explained the property code violations and discussed a plan on addressing the property code violations. Some of the rubbish was cleaned but the tall grass violation remained. The vehicle was not parked on the grass. A compliance notice was sent for the remaining property code violations. 07/05/2022 Staff met with a complainant who expressed concerns about the property. The complainant wanted to know why the complaint entered was closed and the property is still in violation of city ordinance. It was explained that there is already a case for the same violations and the complaint was closed due to an already existing case. The complainant showed photos documenting the condition of the property. 07/14/2022 A follow up inspection was completed and there was no progress made on improving the conditions on the property. An Administrative citation was issued for the following violations: - Unlicensed/inoperable vehicle - $125.00 - Accumulation of Junk/furniture - $125.00 - Illegal parking/storage of vehicle - $125.00 - Dead/disease tree - $125.00 - Accessory building - $125.00 The property also had tall grass and weeds. A compliance notice was sent for the tall grass and wees violation. $625.00 07/21/2022 Mr. Gildemeister did mow the property but there were several areas that were not mowed. 07/28/2022 A follow up inspection was completed and there was some progress made, however, the property remained in violation. A compliance notice was sent. An Administrative Citation was issued for the following violations: - Unlicensed/inoperable vehicle - $250.00 - Accumulation of Junk/furniture - $250.00 - Dead/disease tree - $250.00 - Accessory building - $250.00 The tall grass and weeds still remain in violation and an abatement was ordered and sent to the grass contractor. $1,000.00 08/02/2022 Received confirmation from the grass contractor that the property has been mowed by the owner and is no in compliance. 08/12/2022 A follow up inspection was completed. The inoperable vehicle had updated tabs while the rest of the property remained in violation. 08/16/2022 An inspection was completed and the property conditions did not improve. A compliance notice was sent. 08/26/2022 A follow up inspection was completed and the inoperable vehicles were posted to be towed. The property code violations were not corrected and remained in violation. A tall grass and weed compliance notice was posted and mailed. 09/02/2022 A follow up inspection was completed on the tall grass and weeds violation. The property remained in violation. An abatement was ordered. 09/06/2022 A follow up inspection was completed on the tall grass and weeds violation. The contractor had abated the code violation. Ther is a small section that used to be a flower bed that has not been maintained and is now weeds. Contractor was sent back out to mow the area. 09/08/2022 A follow up inspection was completed and the contractor had mowed the former flower bed area. An abatement fee was charged. $275.00 09/15/2022 A follow up inspection was completed and 2 vehicles were in compliance however, there were 2 other vehicles that were still inoperable. A tow company was called however the vehicles could not be towed because they were blocked in by the other vehicles. An Administrative Citation was issued for the following violations: - Unlicensed/inoperable vehicle - $500.00 - Accumulation of Junk/furniture - $500.00 - Accessory building - $500.00 $1,500.00 10/03/2022 A follow up inspection was completed and the property remained the same, the inoperable vehicles were still in violation. An Administrative Citation was issued and posted for the following violations: $3,000.00 - Unlicensed/inoperable vehicle - $1,000.00 - Accumulation of Junk/furniture - $1,000.00 - Accessory building - $1,000.00 10/10/2022 The amount of $3,125.00 was approved to be specially assessed to the 2023 property tax rolls. 10/17/2022 A follow up inspection was completed and the RV had updated tabs. There was significant improvement in backyard. There is still an inoperable vehicle on the property with expired tabs from 2021 and the garage door did not properly close. A compliance notice was sent. An Administrative Citation was not issued due to the progress that was made on addressing the property code violations. 10/26/2022 A follow up inspection was completed and there was no progress on correction the property code violations. The property conditions did not change from the last inspection on 10/26/2022. An Administrative Citation was issued for the following violations: - Unlicensed/inoperable vehicle - $2,000.00 - Accumulation of Junk/furniture - $2,000.00 - Accessory building - $2,000.00 $6,000.00 11/08/2022 A complaint was received about an inoperable vehicle parked in the street for over a month. The complaint was forwarded to BCPD for follow up since it is a street parking violation. 11/09/2022 A follow up inspection was completed and there was no improvement on the property conditions. Staff spoke with Mr. Gildemeister and informed him of the new code vioaltions Additional property code violations found at the property were added along with the previous code violations. - Accessory building - Illegal parking/storage of vehicles - Unlicensed/inoperable vehicles - Accumulation of junk/furniture - Garbage storage/excessive volume - Waste container storage The vehicle was still parked on the street and saw that CSO had chalked the vehicle’s tires. 11/14/2022 A follow up inspection was completed and staff spoke with Mr. Gildemeister. The inoperable vehicle is accessible for towing and the garage door is still not repaired. The trash/junk is still on the property and a plan was discussed on when it will get removed. Mr. Gildemeister was informed that the recycling bins need to be pulled back to the property if Waste Management is not picking it up. The vehicle parked in the street was moved and the case was closed. 11/15/2022 A follow up inspection was completed and the property was in substantial compliance. Posting of the impound lot information was posted on the door. There were only 2 remaining code violations. - Accessory building - Accumulation of junk/furniture 11/30/2022 A follow up inspection was completed and the property is in compliance with city ordinances. June 14, 2022 Photos July 14, 2022 Photos July 28, 2022 Photos August 29, 2022 Photos September 2, 2022 Photos September 15, 2022 Photos October 3, 2022 Photos October 26, 2022 Photos C ouncil R egular M eeng DAT E:11/13/2023 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :N/A BY:A ngela H olm, F inance D irector S U B J E C T:Res olu+on A pproving the G rant A dministra+on Policy Requested Council A con: Moon to approve a resoluon adopng the G rant A dministraon Policy located in the C ity C ode of Policies; F inancial Policies S econ 2.25 B ackground: A s a result of the City's increased pursuit of and being awarded grants from governmental as well as non- governmental en++es, the C ity C ouncil requested a G rant A dministra+on Policy be establis hed. This w as ini+ally given to s taff and was later referred to the F inance Commission for comple+on. The F inance C ommis s ion members met in early 2023 to discuss the request and determine the most efficient way to complete the tas k. City s taff had obtained sample grant policies from other local municipali+es as well as municipali+es in other states. I t was determined that each member of the Commission would review one of the policies and the group w ould reconvene to discuss the components of their res pec+ve policies that best represented the City's priori+es . The group a9empted to reconvene s everal +mes but s truggled to s ecure the neces s ary quorum to take official ac+on. O ne policy that was received by the group was from the C ity of Bloomington, M N. This policy was a por+on of Bloomington's larger comprehens ive financial policy. I t had been ve9ed by their legal couns el and their City Council. There were many components that aligned well w ith Brooklyn Center's priori+es . D ue to not having quorum for mul+ple mee+ngs , C ity staff elected to proceed forw ard w ith a vers ion of the G rant A dministra+on Policy and pres ented to City Council on M ay 22, 2023 . At that Council mee+ng, a concern w as brought forw ard from a member of the community, and there w as a concern that all members of the F inance Commission had not approved the Policy. D ue to this , the Council requested that addi+onal w ork be done to address the concerns . O ver the course of the next s everal months , there w ere a9empts to reconvene the F inance Commission. Each of these a9empts was uns uccessful. D ue to this , staff elected to have one addi+onal mee+ng, and if that was not s uccessful the policy would be brought back to Council. The final mee+ng regarding the G rant A dminis tra+on Policy w as held on Tues day, November 8th at 6:00 pm at C ity H all. The mee+ng w as posted on the C ity calendar several days in advance. Email communica+on w as sent to all F inance C ommis s ion members reques +ng their a9endance. A remote access link w as provided for interested par+es . This mee+ng did not have quorum. The members pres ent did have a dis cus s ion about the policy. The mos t recent vers ion of the policy is on the consent agenda for the Council mee+ng on Monday, November 13, 2023. B udget I ssues: I nclusive C ommunity Engagement: A nracist/Equity Policy Effect: S trategic Priories and Values: O pera+onal Excellence AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip+on U pload D ate Type G rant A dministra+on Policy 11/8/2023 Exhibit Res olu+on - G rant A dministra+on Policy 11/8/2023 Resolu+on Le9er GRANT ADMINISTRATION The City of Brooklyn Center Grant Administration Policy Contents Introduction Key Resources for Grant Management Policy Statements Authorization to Apply for Grant Funds Award Notification, Review, and Acceptance Post-Award (Grant Execution and Reporting) Grant Closeout Policy Special Tests and Provisions Introduction The purpose of the Grant Administration Policy is to develop, implement, and maintain meaningful grant oversight and coordination for the City of Brooklyn Center (the “City”), the Economic Development Authority (the “EDA”), and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the “HRA”) thereby increasing grant-related revenue, limiting exposure to grant-related legal liability, and improving the efficiency and impact of programs and services funded through grants. To simplify the reference to the City, the EDA, and the HRA within this policy, hereafter they will be referred to collectively as the “The City,” unless specific emphasis is required. The Grant Administration Policy is intended to provide a uniform method of applying for and managing grants. Procedures represent an implementation of policy and should evolve over time as new tools emerge, new processes are designed, and risks change due to environmental changes. Employees throughout the City take on the role of a grant program administrator for a specific grant when they apply for a grant and use those funds. They are the main department or division contact for that specific grant. The Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards” require all recipients and sub-recipients of Federal funds to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Written policies and procedures are part of necessary internal controls and are required as a precondition to receiving grant funds. This policy is intended to be sufficiently comprehensive to adequately meet such requirements. However, in no case is this policy intended to supersede or limit Federal or State laws or regulations, or the provisions of individual grant agreements. Key Resources for Grant Management OMB Uniform Grant Guidance – Guidance provided by the Federal government that is updated yearly. Such updates are reviewed by the City as they become available, and policies and procedures will be revised accordingly when necessary. An example of the May 2022 version can be found at: www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/2022-Compliance- Supplement_PDF_Rev_05.11.22.pdf The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) - The codification of the general and permanent rules published in the Federal Register by the departments and agencies of the Federal Government. It is divided into fifty titles representing broad areas subject to Federal regulation. The Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) is a continuously updated online version of the CFR and provides enhanced features that are not part of the published CFR: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-2/subtitle-A/chapter-II/part- 200?toc=1 City of Brooklyn Center Personnel Policy – All City employees working on grants will comply with the City’s employment rules and policies as defined in the City’s Personnel Policy. City of Brooklyn Center Purchasing Guidelines – All grant purchases will comply with the City’s Purchasing Policy. City of Brooklyn Center Grant Administration Procedure Manual – All employees engaged in grant activities will reference the Grant Administration Procedures Manual for guidance on executing required grant policies. (Note: This procedure manual is currently being drafted to incorporate the policy provisions included in the final version of this policy) Policy Statements  Hierarchy of Authority. Following the guidance provided in the grant award documentation is the primary resource. In the event of conflicting guidance on the administration of Federal awards, the City has deemed Federal guidance to be most authoritative, followed by other State guidance and then local agency guidance.  Revisions. The City is required to establish and document policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the provisions of Federal and State regulations and the provisions of grant agreements. Grant policy and procedures revisions will be reviewed and updated as necessary, but not less than once every five years.  Training. City personnel will be provided necessary finance, procurement, and grant training. Procedures related to the policies within this document will be detailed in a separate Grant Administration Procedure Manual.  Compliance Failures. Compliance failures, whether noted internally or through the external audit process, will be addressed immediately by reviewing the reason for the failure with responsible personnel and devising an improved process to encourage compliance in the future. If discipline is deemed appropriate, the discipline outlined in the City’s Personnel Policy will be followed.  Contractual Requirements. The City will comply with all contractual requirements detailed in its duly executed grant agreements with awarding agencies. This includes adhering to all reporting requirements, eligible expenditure requirements, and grant periods as stated in the agreement.  External Financial Audit. The City will contract annually with an independent Certified Public Accountant firm for the purposes of conducting the City’s external financial audit. To the extent that the City has expended Federal awards more than the applicable Federal Single Audit limit (currently $750,000), the City will have a Federal Single Audit performed in accordance with the Uniform Grant Guidance, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart F, Audits.  Retention Policy. Accounting and financial records (including journal entries, timesheets, invoices, audit reports, and similar documents) shall be retained as required by contractual or regulatory requirements. The City has adopted a records retention schedule as its official guide for records storage, filing, and destruction of accounting and financial records. If the grant specifically requires a longer records retention policy, that grant requirement supersedes the City’s retention policy requirements.  Federal Suspension and Debarment List. Department and division Grant Program Administrators will be responsible for verifying that any vendor paid with Federal grant dollars is not on the Federal suspension and debarment list. This list is also a helpful tool for all vendors paid with grant dollars and should be consulted as appropriate.  Federal Capital Purchases. Inventory of Federal capital purchases will be maintained by the Finance Department, and all items will be tracked annually.  Publicity Statements. All department and division Grant Program Administrators will adhere to the funder’s guidelines for publicity statements in coordination with the City’s Communication Division. Proper acknowledgement will be given to the funder.  Minority and Women’s Business Enterprises. In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, all department and division Grant Program Administrators will take all necessary affirmative steps to ensure that minority businesses and women’s business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible.  Preference for materials purchased in the United States. In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, as appropriate and to the greatest extent practicable under the Federal grant award, there should be a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). Authorization to Apply for Grant Funds The City Manager will authorize grant application submissions and City Council will authorize award acceptance. All award acceptance authorized by the City Council shall also authorize any required budget adjustments for the City. The HRA or EDA Boards will approve authorization for HRA or EDA grant application submissions, award acceptance, and required budget adjustments. This is necessary to:  Ensure grant funds are aligned with strategic priorities;  Highlight any requirements for matching funds;  Allow for City Council, Commission, or Board consideration of the sustainability of the project or program after the grant period ends;  Ensure that grant funded personnel are on a contract basis;   Consider staff capacity to effectively manage the project or program; and  Bring awareness to the City Council, Commission members, Board members, and public of grant applications. Formula grants, recurring Federal funds, and recurring State aids are not required to follow these authorizations. All grant awarded shall have a resolution created and submitted to the City Council, EDA, or HRA Board to accept the award and approve any required budget adjustments. The resolution shall include the original grant solicitation and application including all documents submitted as part of the application as well as communications with the grantor regarding the grant application and award. All grant applications and supporting application documentation, including initial grant solicitations or advertisements, must be stored in accordance with the City’s Document Retention Policy. Award Notification, Review, and Acceptance  Within five (5) calendar days of receipt of the grant award, the department or division’s grant program administrator must forward a copy of the award notification, the grant agreement or contract, and any memoranda of understanding to the City’s Finance Department.  The City’s Finance Department, in collaboration with the City Attorney, shall conduct a review of all grant agreements to assess the terms and conditions of the agreements and ensure the City’s interests and obligations are identified.  If the legal review identifies any potential legal issues stemming from the terms and conditions of the agreement, the submitting department or division must contact the granting entity and seek to resolve the issue.  If the legal review identifies no potential legal issues stemming from the terms and conditions of the agreement, the Finance Department will forward the grant agreement and any related exhibits to the City Clerk for signature by the City Manager or the Mayor, remaining consistent with the signature guidelines contained within the City’s purchasing policy. Post-Award (Grant Execution and Reporting)  No grant funds shall be disbursed until the award letter has been received from the awarding agency, and a fully executed agreement has been signed by the City/EDA/HRA, as applicable, and the granting entity.  Grant funds awarded to the City shall not be used to supplant an existing expense so that current funds can be diverted to another use unless such use of grant funds is explicitly identified as allowable in writing by the granting entity in the grant award.  All revenue resulting from a grant-funded project or program shall adhere to the City’s policies and procedures and be managed and maintained as established in the award letter, grant agreement, contract, special conditions, or other documents generated by the granting entity.  All procurement activity associated with grant-funded projects or programs shall follow the procedures outlined in City’s Purchasing Policy.  All property acquired through grant funds shall be subject to the City’s Purchasing Policy and Statewide procurement requirements, as well as any restrictions and/or requirements set forth within the terms of the grant, including any applicable Federal rules or regulations.  Department and division grant program administrators are ultimately responsible for adherence to the conditions outlined in the approved grant award/contract to ensure that allowable expenditures are incurred.  Department and division grant program administrators in collaboration with the Finance Director are responsible for monitoring all grant related activities and expenditures to ensure compliance with the grant.  Department and division grant program administrators in collaboration with the Finance Director are responsible for the oversight and monitoring of any sub-recipients or sub- awardees.  All grant documentation including award letters, signed grant agreements, related appendices or exhibits, addendums, subsequent communications, and interim financial reporting must be stored in accordance with the City’s Document Retention Policy. Grant Closeout Policy  Upon completion of the grant period of performance, the department or division grant program administrator must prepare a memorandum to the Finance Director identifying the name of the grant and description of the final disposition of the funds and required activities.  If the grant is at risk of not being fully expended within six months prior to the end of the grant cycle, the department or division Grant Program Administrator and the Finance Director will develop a plan.  Upon review of the closeout memorandum and addressing any discrepancies, the Finance Director will confirm grant closeout and submit any final documentation to the granting entity. Special Tests and Provisions To ensure compliance with these requirements, the Finance Director will be assigned the responsibility of identifying financial-related compliance requirements for special tests and provisions, determining approved methods for compliance, and retaining any necessary documentation. Program-related compliance requirements will be the responsibility of the department or division administering the grant. Effective Date: (Originated 07-2023) Policy should be updated at least every 3 years. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. _______________ RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE GRANT ADMINISTRATION POLICY FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, the City Council tasked the Finance Commission to develop a city grant administration policy to establish consistent procedures for all grants secured by the city; and WHEREAS, the Finance Commission has crafted a Grant Administration Policy based on information from other municipalities; and WHEREAS, the Grant Administration Policy will be added to the City Code of Policies; Financial Policies; Section 2.25; Grant Administration Policy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota adopts the Grant Administration Policy located in the City Code of Policies; Financial Policies Section 2.25. November 13, 2023 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council/E D A Work S ession City Hall Council Chambers November 13, 2023 AGE NDA AC T I V E D I S C US S IO N I T E M S 1.F ire Truck P urchase P lan P E ND I NG L I S T F O R F UT URE WO RK S E S S IO NS 1.Upcoming I tems Memorial Policy Special Assessment Policy/Franchise F ees (referred to Financial Commi ssion) Beautification and P ublic Art Commission L iquor S tore 2 Organizational Chart-B udget work sessions New and Repeat Type I V Rental L icense Review (referred to Housing Commission) F ood Truck Ordinance/L icense Emerald Ash B orer Policy Review (referred to Park & Rec Commission November) Opioid Settlement A R PA Funds Grants: Revenues & E xpenses Purchasing Policy I nterveners I mpact Revisit Resolution 2021-73 C ouncil/E DA Work Session DAT E:11/13/2023 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :N/A BY:Todd Berg, F ire Chief/Emergency M anager and A ngela H olm, F inance D irector S U B J E C T:F ire Truck P urchase P lan Requested Council A con: B ackground: B udget I ssues: A nracist/Equity Policy Effect: S trategic Priories and Values: C ouncil/E DA Work Session DAT E:11/13/2023 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :N/A BY:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager S U B J E C T:U pcoming I tems Requested Council A con: Memorial Policy S pecial A s s essment Policy/F ranchise Fees (referred to Financial Commission) Beau/fica/on and P ublic A rt C ommis s ion Liquor S tore 2 O rganiza/onal Chart-Budget work ses s ions New and Repeat Type I V Rental Licens e Review (referred to H ousing C ommission) Food Truck O rdinance/Licens e Emerald A s h Borer Policy Review (referred to Park & Rec C ommission November) O pioid S e:lement A R PA F unds G rants: Revenues & Expens es P urchasing Policy I nterveners I mpact Revis it Resolu/on 2021-73 B ackground: B udget I ssues: A nracist/Equity Policy Effect: S trategic Priories and Values: