HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-199 CCRMember Kay Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. qR-1 q9
RESOLUTION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
APPLICATION NO. 98021 SUBMITTED BY WILLIAM R. STONER
1
WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 98021 submitted by William
R. Stoner proposes rezoning from C-2 (Commerce) to C-1 (Service/Office) of the land located at
5001 Drew Avenue North; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on
November 12, 1998 when a staff report and testimony regarding the rezoning request were taken;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission requested review and comment from the
Southwest Neighborhood Advisory Group; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Application No.
98021 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 98-05 on November 12, 1998; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered Application No. 98021 at its November
23, 1998 meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the rezoning request in light of all
testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating rezonings contained in Section 35-208 of the
City's Zoning Ordinance, the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the
Planning Commission's recommendation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that Application No. 98021 submitted by William R. Stoner be approved in
consideration of the following;
1. The proposed rezoning to the C-1 zoning designation is considered to be a public
benefit by limiting the uses of the property to a less intense commercial use which
is considered to be more compatible with surrounding property, particularly the
R-1 zoned property to the north.
2. All permitted uses in the proposed C-1 zoning district can be contemplated for
development or redevelopment on the subject property.
City Council Resolution No. 98-199
3. The subject property will bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the
C-1 zoning district.
4. The property in question is considered to be more suitable for a C-1 rather than a
C-2 zoning designation given the surrounding land uses. The C-1 rezoning will
rule out more intense and perhaps less desirable commercial uses which are
otherwise allowed int he C-2 district.
5. Limiting the commercial utilization of this property to a less intense, less intrusive
service/office zoning designation is considered to be in the best interests of the
community.
6. In light of the above, it is believed that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the
guidelines for evaluating rezonings contained in Section 35-208 of the Zoning
Ordinance and is, therefore, in the best interests of the community.
1
November 23, 1998
Date
ATTEST: ? "'z6'
=ay
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Robert Peppe and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
Myrna Kragness, Kathleen Carmody, Eebra Hilstrom, Kay Lasman, and Robert Peppe;
and the following voted against the same: none,
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.