HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981 09-15 PRMMINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PARK AND RECREATION
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN TBE
_v COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
SEPTEMBER 15, 1981
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center Park and Recreation Commission met in regular session and
was called to order by Chairman Johnson at 7:30 p.m.-
ROLL CALL
Chairman Johnson, Commissioners Streitz, Sorenson-, and Den ssen. Also present
were Parks and Recreation Director Gene Hagel and Administrative Assistant Tom
Bublitz.
Chairman Johnson noted that Commissioners Kiefer, Albright, and Bradford would.
be absent from this evenings meeting and were excused. He also noted that
Councilmember Kuefler would be late for this evenings meeting but would be
in attendance.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - April 8, 1981 - May 19, 1981
Chairman Johnson noted that the approval of the April and May minutes would have
to be deferred until the next meeting since a quorum of commissioners present at
those two meetings are not present at this--evenings meeting and therefore cannot
approve the minutes.
REVIEW OF PARK DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES
The Director of Parks and Recreation reviewed a memorandum from himself to the
City Manager regarding a review of park bond monies for neighborhood, Palmer
Lake and Central Parks. He noted that with the demise of the Federal LAWCON
program the local share of any park grant monies has increased to 50%. Formerly
he pointed out, the local share was only 25% with 50% being provided by the
Federal Government through LAWCON and 25% through the State LCMR funds. In
review of the grant program demise the staff is recommending certain items be
deferred in the development of.the parks.
He pointed out that in the development proposed for the neighborhood parks
there are no federal dollars involved and that a balance of $19,659 remains
unexpended in this area. He explained that in the Palmer Lace Nature Area a
grant has been virtually assured and that the development of the area as per
the Brauer study would leave a net deficit of approximately $29,300. He noted
the deficit was due to the demise of the Federal LAWCON program under which
funds were anticipated in the original plans and would have increased the
funding by an additional 25% or approximately $60,000. In Central Park he
pointed out the staff is recommending deferral of certain items which they
believe would not be detrimental to the overall quality of the park. The
items which are recommended for deferral include baseball field lighting,
•
9-15-81 -1-
i
the building at the baseball diamond, a parking lot for the archery range, the
amphitheater, and the fencing to enclose the baseball and softball diamonds.
The Director of Parks and Recreation then proceeded to review several projects
which were not contemplated in the original bond issue including tennis courts
at Lions Park, toilet screens for the neighborhood parks, parkway lighting along
the Palmer Lake Nature Area and the dredging of Palmer Lake.as recommended by
the Brauer study.
After the report made by the Director of Parks and Recreation the Commission
disucssed the staff recommendations contained in the Diredtor's memorandum.
Chairman Johnson asked the Commissioners if they were ready to act on the
recommended modifications and priorities for park development. He pointed out
that the Commission should be reminded that deferring the ''lighting on the base-
ball field in Central Park may not remove the pressure on 'the Grandview field
as was indicated to the residents in the Grandview Park neighborhood during
the meetings conducted in the various City parks at the time of the bond issue.
The Director of Parks and Recreation noted that he will be talking with the
residents in the Grandview area regarding this subject.
There was a motion by Commissioner Streitz and seconded b~ Commissioner Sorenson
to recommend that the City Council approve the modified priorities in park
development items as recommended in the Director of Parksland Recreation memo
randum dated September 8, 1981. The vote on the motion was unanimous.
REVIEW OF CITY PARK PROPERTIES
The Director of Parks and Recreation reviewed a memorandum regarding the recom-
mended ratio of acres of park land to population based on!current population
statistics. He noted that the City Council had requested the Park and Recreation
Commission to review all City park property with regard to future parkland
requirements in an effort to determine the current and future need for park property.
Administrative Assistant Bublitz pointed out that the Council is looking for feed-
back from the Park and Recreation Commission regarding the total amoung of parkland
in Brooklyn Center and whether or not the Commission believes there is too much
or too little parkland based on standards used in the Park and Recreation field.
Discussion developed among Commissioners regarding usage of parks in Brooklyn
Center. There was a general consensus among Commission members that the parks
in Brooklyn Center are used extensively. Chairman Johnson noted that the
distribution of City parks is well balanced and that in general playgrounds are
within 1/4 of a mile of most homes.
Commissioner Sorenson questioned whether the parkland ratio to population in the
southeast neighborhood would be considerably less than the rest of the City.
The Director of Parks and'Recreation stated that it probai)ly would be less than
other areas of the City. Commissioner Sorenson suggested that this area may
experience a high turnover in its population due to the m unber of younger families
moving into the area. Administrative Assistant Bublitz reviewed the proposed
elderly housing project which is designed to allow elderly persons desiring to
leave their single family home to live in a townhouse or condominimum style
dwelling while allowing younger families to purchase theilt single family homes.
9-15-81 -2-
I
The Director of Parks and Recreation noted that people in the southeast neighbor-
hood may experience some disadvantage compared to other areas of the City with
regard to distance to City parks. Administrative Assistant Bublitz stated the
Council's inquiry is whether or not the Commission believes there is a need for
any less parkland or more parkland in Brooklyn Center. After some discussion
the Commissioners arrived at a concensus that there was not an excess amount of
parkland in the City of Brooklyn Center. Chairman Johnson stated a review of
the amoung of parkland in the City will be an ongoing discussion but at this
point in time the Commission does not believe there is an excess of parkland in
the City. Also he pointed out the Commission appears to agree that the southeast
neighborhood may require additional parkland. .
RECESS
The Brooklyn Center Park and Recreation Commission recessed at 8:30 p.m. and
reconvened at 8:45 p.m.
PROGRESS REPORT ON PARK DEVELOPMENT
The Park and Recreation Director reviewed the status of park development in the
City including the Shingle Creek Trailway bridge over highway 94.which is to
open in the fall of this year. He stated that bids were let on the F & M
exercise trail and that this will be completed by the fall of 1981. He reviewed
the status of development in neighborhood parks noting that the apparatus areas
in 8 of the neighborhood parks are complete to date and that curbing around the
apparatus areas will be completed within two weeks.
Councilmember Kuefler arrived at 8:50 p.m.
PARK LAND ACQUISITION
The Director of Parks and Recreation informed Commission members that the City
had obtained an option on a portion of a parcel of land lying west of Shingle
Creek across from Lions Park. He noted the area is approximately 16 acres and
that the City has the option on the majority of the project area. Administrative
Assistant Bublitz noted that the Council has requested the Park and Recreation
Commission to review the acquisition of this parcel as public land. He noted
that the land could be used for future park purposes and also to gain control of
the flood plain in the area pointing out that the entire area is within the flood
plain. He noted that October 19, 1981 is the last regular Council meeting at
which the option to purchase the property could be exercised.
Chairman Johnson inquired if there was any merit in holding a public meeting
regarding the purchase of the property. Administrative Assistant Bublitz
stated that community wide input with notices sent to a targeted area would be
a possible way of approaching the public meeting. Commissioner Sorenson then
inquired what the reason was for obtaining public input. Councilmember Kuefler
stated that the impact of acquiring more land by the City is really a community
wide issue. Chairman Johnson suggested that notice of public meeting be
published in the Brooklyn Center Post and that specific letters be sent to the
neighborhood bordering the area in question.
The Park and Recreation Commission discussed the acquisition of the property and
an informal polling of Commissioners present indicated a high degree of support
for the acquisition of the property but the Commission would first like to invite
further input from the community. Chairman Johnson recommended the October Park
9-15-81 -3-
*0
and Recreation Commission meeting be held on the 13th of October and that this
meeting be used as a public forum to consider the park land acquisition.
REVIEW OF PROPOSAL FOR LOCATION OF SOCCER FIELDS
The Director of Parks and Recreation presented a proposal for the location of the
soccer fields proposed under the park improvements plan in conjunction with the
bond issue. He noted that the soccer fields had originally been proposed for
Central Park but that sail conditions and other space considerations made their
location in Central Park inadvisable. He explained the proposal is to place the
soccer fields on the property currently occupied by the City Maintenance Annex
and on property owned by Evergreen School. He explained the City Maintenace
Annex would be relocated to tax forfieted property acquired by the City along
Camden Avenue east of Evergreen Park.
After a brief discussion of the proposal presented regarding the relocation of
the soccer fields there was a consensus of Commission members present to endorse
the proposal.
I
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Commissioner Streitz and seconded by Commissioner Denissen
to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. ~he Brooklyn Center Park
and Recreation Commission adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
0
Chairman
9-15-81, -4-