HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977 05-17 PRMMINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PARK AND
RECREATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN
CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE
OF MINNESOTA
REG ULAR SESSION
MAY 17, 1977
CITE' HALL
Call to Order The Brooklyn Center Park and Recreation Commission met
in regular session and was called to order by Vice-Chairman
Bogle at 7:05 p.m.
Roll Call Vice-Chairman Bogle, Commissioners Nyquist, Hickman,
and Vela sco . Also present were Councilman Tony Kuefler;,
David Larson, Park Service Area I; j3net Reardon, Park
Service Area IV; Director of Parks ar.d Recreation Gene
Hagel and Administrative Assistants Ronald Warren and
Brad Hoffman.
Commissioners The first item of business introduced by Vice-Chairman
Report on Kaleidoscope Bogle was a report from each of the Commissioners on
their observations and'feelings about the Commission's
booth at Kaleidoscope. Vice-Chairman Bogle stated that
• he did not speak to a great number of people but those
individuals with whom he did speak had indicated positive
support for the Central Park Development Plan. Commis-
sioner Vela sco added that he had spoken to three (3) indi-
viduals who live next to Central Park that desire the
development of the Park. He further stated that they had
indicated that most people in that area were eager for its
development.
The discussion continued with Councilman Kuefler noting
that the feedback that he had received about the Commis-
sion's booth had been very positive. Park and Recreation
Director Gene Hagel informed the Commission that the
display used at Kaleidoscope could be seen throughout the
summer in the Civic Center gallery. He added that park
plans for each park service area would be displayed some-
time during the summer and that he would contact the
Commissioners when the plans for their respective areas
would be on display.
Park Service Committee Commissioner Nyquist had not been informed of changes at
Reports - Commissioners Twin Lake and Park and Recreation Director Gene Hagel
Nyquist & Hickman indicated that he would see that she received a copy of
such changes. Commissioner Nyquist then indicated that
she would give her Park Service Committee Report at the
next meeting.
-1- 5-17-77
Commissioner Hickman noted that the shelter buildings
for Riverdale Park, as listed on the priority rating sheets,
should be crossed out. She also suggested that the rest-
rooms at Riverdale be given an 8a priority rating.
-The next item of business introduced by Vice-Chairman
Bogle was a report, requested by the Commission at the.
April, 1977- meeting, relative to the usage of lighted
tennis courts in other cities and the distance from courts
in Brooklyn Center to nearby residential homes. The
Secretary distributed additional data and Bob Hill gave a
detailed explanation of the data he had collected for the
Commission. Councilman Kuefler inquired why the
column for the year 1976 under the cities of Golden Valley
and St. Anthony were blank. Bob Hill explained that he
was not able to secure that information in time for this
Commission meeting.
Bob Hill then addressed himself to two (2) concerns of
the Commission. The first concern dealt with noise
levels from the tennis courts and the second was light
spillover from the tennis courts. Bob Hill noted that the
proximity of lighted tennis courts to residential homes
was just a single factor of consideration. He explained
that in many instances, natural barriers such as shrubbery
tended to alleviate the two (2) problems or concerns of
the Commission. He referred to 6921 Major Avenue North
as being a good example of this. The home itself is
approximately 95 ft. from the tennis court, the closest
of any in Brooklyn Center. However, lilacs and other
large shrubbery screen the court from the. view of the
house and help to lessen any noise emanating from the
court. -Park and Recreation Director Gene Hagel added
that tennis court lights are directional in nature and that
spillover from the lights is minimal. Commissioner
Schroeder stated that his primary concern has been the
effect noise levels would have on nearby residences
as well as the possible light spillover. He also indi-
cated that the status report helped to alleviate those
concerns. He inquired if other cities had experienced
the type of problems that had been just discussed.
Bob Hill replied that the City. survey indicates extremely
heavy usage of lighted tennis courts in other cities and
that they were not experiencing such problems. A
discussion then ensued as to the origin of the tennis
court lighting issue before the Commission. Commis-
sioner Schroeder noted that he had had some reservations
about tennis court lighting and if it should be included
in the priority listings for each park. Following a brief
discussion as to the lighting cost versus income, Com-
missioner Schroeder introduced 'a motion seconded by
Commissioner Hickman to recommend lighting tennis
courts as planned in the priority ratings for each park.
Tie vote was unanimous.
Tennis Court Lightin,*
& Usage Report
•
Skating Rink Discussion At the April, 1977 Park and Recreation Commission meeting,
Commissioner Schroeder introduced a motion to recommend
to the City Council that an energy conservation commission
be established and that they be charged with the responsi-
bility of reviewing all energy expenditures on the part of
the City and to formulate a comprehensive energy policy
for the City. It was decided at that meeting to discuss
the resolution at the May 17, 1977 Park and Recreation
Commission meeting.
Commissioner Hickman inquired of Councilman Kuefler
what actions or steps the City Council had taken to
conserve energy used by the City. Councilman Kuefl.er
replied that the Council had not taken any specific actions
but had supported the staff in their efforts to curb energy
usage over the past three (3) years. The Secretary added
that the staff had taken a number of measures which
included but were not limited to; the use of smaller more
economical automobiles for the staff, police officers and
all other city vehicles, installation of new windows for
City Hall to reduce heat loss, the reduction in the number
of light bulbs throughout the City Hall, administrative
policies regulating the heating and cooling of the building,
office temperatures were set at 550 over weekends, the
closing of the Civic Center on some weekends, and the
use of tachographs in City vehicles in order to maintain
an ongoing study of the City's driving needs and habits.
He further noted that while the City does not have a formal.
written energy policy the City has examined where energy
is consumed and has taken mea cures to reduce that con-
sumption.
Councilman Kuefler left at 8:30 p.m.
It was also noted by the Secretary that the Conservation
Commission, which is already in existence, has been
charged with the responsibilities noted in the Park and
Recreation Commission Resolution.
A lengthy discussion ensued with Vice-Chairman Bogle.
reviewing the progression of the skating rink issue. Ile
noted that the Commission had been charged with review-
ing and recommending to the Council which skating rinks
should be closed to conserve fuel.
Cost factors of maintaining rinks were then discussed.
David Larson, from Park Service Area I, inquired as to the
cost of maintaining skating rinks. Park and Recreation.
Director Gene Hagel. noted that it was one of the most
• expensive single items for the Park and Recreation Depart-
ment in terms of mant!ours. Commissioner Schroeder
suggested that closing skating rinks would hurt the City's
image because so many citizens identify local government
with but a few departments such as Park and Recreation
-3- 5-17-77
and the Police Department. He further suggested an effort
should ;Je made to make people aware if the engegy conser-
vation measures taken by the City. He inquired why alterna-
tive heating sources for warming houses had not been explored,
Administrative Assistant Ronald Warren replied that warming
houses were far from being energy efficient and at present no
practical alternative was available. Commissioner Velasco
inquired if the City had not provided unheated warming houses
in the past. Park and Recreation Director Gene Hagel indicated
that it was true that unheated warming houses had been used
in the past but experience indicated that the skating rinks
were not used under such conditions. Commissioner Hickman
stated that she would like to talk to her committee again and
vote on the skating rink issue at the next meeting. Vice-
Chairman Bogle replied that the Commission had an obligation
to make a recommendation to the Council and that the matter
had been before them long enough.
Commissioner Schroeder re-introduced his resolution calling
for a comprehensive energy plan on the part of the City in
the formation on an energy conservation commission. Com-
missioner Nyquist seconded the motion. After a brief
discussion in which the Secretary reemphasized the measures
taken by the City and the inconsistency of the resolution
with those measures, Commissioner Hickman called for a
vote. The Park and Recreation Commission voted unanimously
against the motion.
Commissioner Velasco then moved and Commissioner Hickman
seconded the motion to close all City skating rinks except
the ten playfield skating rinks suggested by the staff for a
period of one (1) year for energy conservation purposes. The
motion recommends that the City Council review the matter at
the end of the one (1) year. Commissioner Schroeder then in-
troduced an amendment to the motion to include Firehouse and
Orchard Lane Parks with those parks having skating rinks. The
amendment was seconded by Commissioner Velasco and the
Commission voted unanimously to accept the amendment: The
Commission then voted on the original motion as amended.
The motion passed unanimously.
Vice-Chairman Bogle noted that priority ratings had already
been covered in the Commissioner's Committee Report and
moved to the next item.
Commissioner Nyqust moved and Commissioner Hickman
seconded the adjournment to the meeting. The motion passed
unanimously. The Brooklyn Center Park and Recreation
Commission adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
Chairman
Priority Ratings
Adjournment
•
•
w
-4- 5-17-77