HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024.10.14 CCP REGC IT Y C O UNC IL
M E E T I NG
City Hall Council Chambers
October 14, 2024
AGE NDA
1.Call to Order - 7:00 p.m.
Attendees please turn o ff cell phones and pages during the meeting. A copy of the full me e ting packet
is available in the binder at the entrance to the Council Chambers.
2.Roll Call
3.P ledge of Allegiance
4.Informal Open Forum
This is an opportunity for the public to address the City Council on items that are not on the agenda. It
is limited to 15 minutes. It may no t be used to make personal attacks, air personality grievances, make
political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a
dialogue with the presenter. Questions fro m the Council will be for clarificatio n purposes only. It will
not be used as a time fo r proble m-solving or reacting to the comments made but for hearing the
presenter for informational purposes only.
The first call will be for those that have notified the Clerk that they would like to speak during the
open forum and then ask if any one connec ted to this meeting would like to speak. W hen called
upon, please indicate your name and then proceed. Please be sure to state your name before
speaking.
a.Meeting Decorum
5.Invocation - Graves
6.Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda
These items are considered to be routine by the C ity Council and will be enacted by one
motion. There isn't a separate discussion for these items unless a Counc ilmember so requests,
then it is moved to the end of the Council Consideration I tems.
a.Approval of Minutes
- Motion to approve meeting minutes
September 23, 2024 Study Session
September 23, 2024 Regular Session
b.Approval of L icenses
- Motion to approve the licenses as presented.
c.Resolution A ppointing E lection J udges for the 2024 General E lection
- Motion to approve a resolution appointing election judges for the
November 5, 2024, General Election.
d.Resolution Requesting Adopting of the Hennepin County A ll-County Mitigation
Plan
- Motion to adopt the Hennepin County Al l-Hazard Mi ti gati on Plan.
7.P resentations/Proclamations/Recognitions/Donations
a.Proclamation Recognizing Open Hands, I nc. for their 25th Anniversary on
October 5, 2024
8.P ublic Hearings
a.Proposed Special Assessments for Nuisance A batement Costs,
Administrative F ines/Citations, Tall Grass and Weed Abatement Costs, Dead
Disease Tree Abatement Costs, and Administratively Registered Vacant
Properties
- Motion to:
· Open the public hearings concurrently;
· Take public input; and
· Close the public hearings.
- Motion to Adopt Resolution Certifying Speci al Assessments for
Administrative Citations to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls
- Motion to Adopt Resoluti on Certifying Speci al Assessments for Diseased
Tree Removal Costs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls
- Motion to Adopt Resolution Certifying Speci al Assessments for Weed
Removal Costs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls
- Motion to Adopt Resolution Certifying Speci al Assessments for
Abatements Costs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls
- Motion to Adopt Resolution Certifying Speci al Assessments for
Administratively Registered Vacant Properties Costs to the Hennepin
County Property Tax Rolls
b.Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Delinquent 2024 P ublic Utility
Service A ccounts and Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for
Emergency P rivate Utility S ervice Repairs to the Hennepin County Property
Tax Rolls
- Motion to:
Open the public hearing;
Take public input; and
Close the public hearing.
- Motion to approve a resolution certifying special assessments for
delinquent public utility service accounts to the Hennepin County property
tax rolls.
- Motion to approve a resolution certifying special assessments for
emergency private utility service repairs to the Hennepin County property
tax rolls.
9.P lanning Commission Items
a.An Ordinance A mending S ection 35-4103 (Allowed Use Table) of the City
Code of Ordinances Regarding Places for Religious Assembly in the
Business Mixed-Use (MX -B ) District - 2nd Reading
- Motion to deny the zoning text amendment proposed by Applicant Trinity
International Fellowship regarding Section 35-4103 (Allowed Use Table) of
the City Code of Ordinances, and as outlined under Planning Commission
Application No. 2024-011, that would allow for Places for Religious
Assembly as a conditional use within the Business Mixed-Use (MX-B)
District.
T he P lanning Commission recommended approval of the requested
amendment on a 3-2 vote at their S eptember 12, 2024 meeting. At the
September 23, 2024 City Council meeting, a request was made to table the
first reading of the proposed ordinance amendment and a request for
additional information was made.
City staf f maintains the position that, based on the findings presented within
the provided staf f report, the requested ordinance amendment should be
denied; however, if City C ouncil elects to recommend approval of the request
to amend S ection 35-4103 (A llowed Use Table) to allow f or P laces for
Religious Assembly as a conditional use in the B usiness Mixed-Use (MX-B)
District, the motion language should be to approve the second reading and
adopt the ordinance amendment.
10.Council Consideration Items
a.Brooklyn Center City Council's Official Public Comment on the Minnesota
Department of Transportation's Highway 252/I -94 Over-Under A nalysis
Preference
- Motion to approve a resolution declaring the Brooklyn Center City
Council’s official public comment on the Minnesota Department of
Transportation’s Highway 252/I-94 Over/Under analysis preference.
11.Council Report
12.Adjournment
COUNCIL MEETING DECORUM
To ensure meetings are conducted in a professional and courteous manner which enables the orderly
conduct of business, all persons in attendance or who participate in such meetings shall conduct
themselves in a manner that does not interfere with the ability of others to observe and, when allowed,
to participate without disruption or fear of intimidation.
A. Decorum. Persons who attend meetings must avoid conduct that disrupts, interferes with, or
disturbs the orderly conduct of the meeting or the ability of other attendees to observe and
participate as appropriate. To that end, persons who attend meetings are subject to the following:
(1) Members of the public may only speak during meetings when allowed under Council Rules
and only after being recognized by the presiding officer. The presiding officer may establish
time limits for the acceptance of public comments or testimony.
(2) Public comments or testimony must be addressed to the presiding officer and not to other
Council Members, staff, or others in attendance.
(3) All elected officials shall be referred to by their proper title and surname.
(4) Public comments should avoid personal accusations, profanity, or other improper content for
a public meeting.
(5) Intimidating behaviors, threats of hostility, or actual violence are disallowed.
(6) Audible demonstrations intended to disrupt the meeting should be avoided, including
stomping of feet, snapping of fingers, clapping of hands, and other conduct that may be
intimidating or threatening to others.
(7) Holding, displaying, or placing banners, signs, objects, or other materials in any way that
endangers others, prevents the free flow of individuals within the chamber, or obstructs or
prevents the viewing of the meeting by others is not allowed.
B. The presiding officer shall request any person(s) who disrupt, interfere with or disturb the
orderly conduct of a meeting to cease the conduct and, as necessary, shall issue an oral
warning to the individual(s) found to be in violation. If the individual(s) persists in disrupting,
interfering with, or disturbing the meeting, the presiding officer may have the individual(s)
removed or, under appropriate circumstances, temporarily clear the gallery. If for any reason
the presiding officer fails to take such action, a majority vote may be substituted for action
by the presiding officer to maintain order and decorum over the proceedings.
C. The Council Chambers capacity is 76 persons per fire code.
C ouncil R egular M eeng
DAT E:10/14/2024
TO :C ity C ouncil
F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager
T H R O U G H :D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager
BY:Barb S uciu, A ssistant City Manager/C ity C lerk
S U B J E C T:A pproval of Minutes
Requested Council A con:
- Moon to approve meeng minutes
S eptember 23, 2024 S tudy S ession
S eptember 23, 2024 Regular S ession
B ackground:
I n accordance with M innesota S tate S tatute 15.17, the official records of all mee4ngs must be documented
and approved by the governing body.
B udget I ssues:
- None
I nclusive C ommunity Engagement:
- None
A nracist/Equity Policy Effect:
- None
S trategic Priories and Values:
P rovide quality s ervices w ith fair and equitable treatment
AT TA C H M E N TS :
D escrip4on U pload D ate Type
09.23 S tudy S es s ion 10/11/2024 Backup M aterial
09.23 Regular S ession 10/11/2024 Backup M aterial
9/23/24 -1- DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
STUDY SESSION
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024
CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session called to order by Mayor April Graves at
6:07 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor April Graves and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, Dan Jerzak, and Teneshia Kragness.
Councilmember Kris Lawrence-Anderson was absent and excused. Also present were City
Manager Reggie Edwards, Recreation Department Customer Service Representative Rachel
Kenyon, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk Barb Suciu, Deputy City Clerk Shannon Pettit, and
City Attorney Cristina Cruz-Jennings.
CITY COUNCIL MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION ITEMS
Mayor Graves noted she emailed the Council about Open Hands, Inc. She read the email in full
describing the organization, its history, and its efforts in the community. Their 25th Anniversary
will be celebrated in October. She suggested drafting a letter or proclamation showing their
support and thankfulness for the organization’s impact on the community.
Councilmember Jerzak stated he would support a letter and proclamation.
Mayor Graves requested Staff draft a proclamation.
CITY MANAGER MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION ITEMS
City Manager Reggie Edwards pointed out City Attorney Siobhan Tolar is not present. In her
place, Cristina Cruz-Jennings is present.
2025 LEGISLATIVE PROCESS
City Manager Reggie Edwards explained the legislative process is an annual rhythm for the
Council to review their priorities. Dr. Edwards noted there is a tour of the Public Works Garage
for Brooklyn Center’s representatives because the City is seeking out funding for the Garage. He
stated there is an open house at the garage on Friday, October 25 at 9:00 a.m.
9/23/24 -2- DRAFT
Councilmember Jerzak indicated he is interested in attending the event. Councilmember Kragness
stated she is interested as well. Dr. Edwards confirmed invitations will be sent out. It would be
beneficial for Councilmembers present at the tour to further advocate for the funding.
Dr. Edwards pointed out there was a legislative breakfast hosted by the City during the previous
legislative session, and it was very successful. The next legislative lunch is November 20, 2024.
The time was moved to make the event more convenient. Save the Dates will be sent out in the
near future.
Mayor Graves confirmed she is available on November 20 for the event.
Dr. Edwards stated there will be an agenda item to further discuss legislative priorities after the
Public Works Garage tour. There will be two opportunities to discuss legislative priorities and the
priorities will be finalized November 12, 2024. The legislative session will begin in January 2025.
Then in June 2025, there will be a recap of the session provided to the Council.
Councilmember Jerzak requested the tables at the luncheon be a mix of folks to promote
networking. Additionally, he requested a microphone and podium be available. Lastly, he asked
that there be some time to eat food prior to entering discussions so everyone has the opportunity
to eat without awkwardness.
Councilmember Kragness expressed her support for the plan and explained she hopes to get their
priorities in front of the right people.
Mayor Graves asked if there are priorities of interest to the Council that aren’t currently on Staff ’s
radar.
Councilmember Jerzak asked for Staff to provide a list of priorities to the Council for review prior
to an official discussion. He noted he would like to see the Public Works Garage receive funding,
and he would like to prepare for possible testimony in support of the Garage.
Mayor Graves stated Staff could send a list of the previous year’s priorities for the Council to work
from. There has been consideration if the calculations for Local Government Aid are equitable for
cities like Brooklyn Center. She noted she recently met with the Crime Prevention Federal
Advocacy Committee through the National League of Cities, and they have prepared their
legislative priorities at the Federal level. She added there is an urge for the Federal government to
provide funds supporting crime prevention efforts at the local level, and she would like to see
Brooklyn Center prioritize the same concept.
Councilmember Jerzak pointed out that the Surgeon General recently declared a public health
crisis regarding social media. It may be worth learning more about the declaration and if there is
a place for legislative support.
Mayor Graves stated there is a need for more diverse voices at elective tables. She suggested more
9/23/24 -3- DRAFT
folks participate in committees and whatnot.
Councilmember Jerzak reiterated his interest in obtaining financial support for the Public Works
Garage. He would also like to see Tax Increment Funding timelines be extended. Highway 252
and alternative response teams could also benefit from some additional support.
Mayor Graves noted she would like to revisit the Council conduct documents.
Councilmember Kragness confirmed she has notes to discuss that topic.
Councilmember Jerzak stated he has reviewed the documents, but he has been more focused on
the budget lately. He stated he would prepare suggestions for the draft.
DISCUSSION OF WORK SESSION AGENDA ITEMS AS TIME PERMITS
PARKS AND SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT PROCESS
Dr. Edwards introduced the item and invited Customer Service Representative Rachel Kenyon and
Assistant City Manager/City Clerk Barb Suciu to continue the presentation.
Ms. Kenyon explained she and one other Staff member oversee the permitting process for park
use. There are shelter or building rentals available at fifteen parks throughout Brooklyn Center.
Rentals are available from May 1 through October 15. Brooklyn Center residents are able to make
reservations around mid-March of each year while non-residents can make reservations beginning
in late April. Rental applications must be filled out in person at the Community Center. A proof
of address is required when applying for a park permit. The permitholder must be onsite during
the rental.
Ms. Kenyon noted Staff has a number of procedures during the time of application. There are
different shelters and buildings recommended based on the party size, amenities, and available
dates. Staff reviews park policies and permitholder responsibilities at the time of the rental. If any
request has a component that would require a Special Events Permit, Staff refer the applicant to
the City Clerk’s Office.
Ms. Kenyon added Staff call permitholders the week of their rental to remind them of the park
policies and expectations. Parks and Recreation Outreach Staff stop by each rental to discuss
policies and expectations and act as a contact if the permitholder needs any assistance during their
rental. After the rental, Staff compiles feedback from Outreach Staff, Public Works Department
Staff, and law enforcement to determine whether a deposit will be refunded.
Assistant City Manager/City Clerk Barb Suciu pointed out that a Special Events License is issued
for a temporary, organized activity sponsored by an event organizer involving the gathering of
people to attend, participate, or observe an activity occurring entirely or partly outdoors on City or
private property.
9/23/24 -4- DRAFT
Ms. Suciu explained criteria for a Special Events License include the attendance of 100 or more
people, ancillary activities, and the use of sound amplification systems or speakers that will likely
result in noise levels that will unreasonably disturb others in the immediate area. City Ordinance
requires an event occurring on the same property shall not extend for more than three consecutive
days without special circumstances. Additionally, events that are scheduled to occur on a regular
basis or throughout an entire season can have one Special Event Permit for the entire period.
Ms. Suciu noted the fully completed application must be submitted at least 45 days before the
event’s starting date. For large-scale events involving 1,000 participants or more, the application
must be made 90 days in advance. The application is reviewed by the City Clerk’s Office for
completeness.
Ms. Suciu added the application is routed to various Departments. The Parks and Streets
Superintendent reviews the application for any necessary road closures and traffic control
measures. The Public Works Director considers utilities and clean-up. The Police Chief handles
amplified sound and security plans as needed. The Parks and Recreation Director handles any
approvals for park use and clean up. The City Planner or Building Official determines needs for
trash disposal, restrooms, food permits, and tents. Lastly, the City Clerk oversees any alcohol
permitting.
Ms. Suciu explained once an application is reviewed by all relevant Departments, the City Clerk
sees if the application has been approved or denied. From there, the City Clerk sends the applicant
the Special Events License if approved.
Councilmember Kragness asked if an applicant signed anything. Ms. Kenyon pointed out where
the applicant signs on the forms. There is an area to review policies before signing.
Councilmember Kragness stated the documents state tobacco and the like are prohibited from use
in the amphitheater or any City property, but it doesn’t specify the same for shelter rentals. Ms.
Kenyon stated not every Ordinance is listed on the application. However, the tobacco prohibition
detail can be added.
Mayor Graves noted the documents stated a County food license is required when serving food.
Later on, the document states gambling or charging admission is prohibited. She asked how an
event at the amphitheater can be a private event. Ms. Kenyon stated an amphitheater may be used
for a smaller gathering, but there isn’t anything such as a physical barrier to keep others out of the
amphitheater.
Councilmember Jerzak asked if there has been a study to determine if the fees match the required
Staff time to process an application. Ms. Kenyon stated she wasn’t involved in the initial fee
calculations, but they do consider Parks and Recreation Staff timing. They also compare rates to
other parks.
Ms. Suciu added there is a debrief held after the rental season to discuss any changes that need to
9/23/24 -5- DRAFT
be made.
Mayor Graves thanked Staff for the presentation.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Graves adjourned the meeting at 6:51 p.m.
9/23/24 -1- DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024
CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor April
Graves at 7:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Mayor April Graves and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, Dan Jerzak, and Teneshia Kragness.
Councilmember Kris Lawrence-Anderson was absent and excused. Also present were City
Manager Reggie Edwards, Director of Fiscal & Support Services Angela Holm, Zoning
Administrator Ginny McIntosh, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk Barb Suciu, Deputy City
Clerk Shannon Pettit, and City Attorney Cristina Cruz-Jennings.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
4. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM
Mayor April Graves opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum. She reviewed
the rules of conduct.
Sophia W. suggested yard signs be made for residents to share information about the Community
Center referendum as it will be on the upcoming ballot. The link could also provide more
information on the ballot in general. Yard signs could be used year-round encouraging folks to
read about local politics to promote community engagement.
Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to close the Informal Open
Forum at 7:08 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
5. INVOCATION
Councilmember Butler shared a quote from the Dalai Lama, “Do not let the behavior of others
destroy your inner peace.”
9/23/24 -2- DRAFT
6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Jerzak moved and Mayor Graves seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent
Agenda, and the following consent items were approved:
6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. September 9, 2024 – Study Session
2. September 9, 2024 – Regular Session
3. September 9, 2024 – EDA/Work Session
6b. LICENSES
RENTAL
INITIAL (TYPE II – two-year license)
4307 66th Avenue N Fyr Sfr Borrower Llc
5712 Bryant Avenue N Fyr Sfr Borrower Llc
5901 Pearson Drive HOME TRS LLC
6243 France Avenue N Fyr Sfr Borrower Llc
RENEWAL (TYPE IV – six-month license)
1302 69th Avenue N Aeon Holdings Llc
5542 Judy Lane Kao Yang & Mai Yer Xiong
6400 Fremont Avenue N Jesus Vazquez Martinez
RENEWAL (TYPE III – one-year license)
3012 51st Avenue N Sri Lakshmi Valiveti
5906 Dupont Avenue N Bruce & Rebecca Goldberg
6613 Camden Drive Mark One Resources Llc
RENEWAL (TYPE II – two-year license)
4210 Lakebreeze Avenue N Simons Revocable Trust
5327 Queen Avenue N Myrka Zambrano
5322 Irving Avenue N Peter Phuong Nguyen
RENEWAL (TYPE I – three-year license)
4207 Lakeside Ave N, #238 Hussein G Seman
9/23/24 -3- DRAFT
2932 69th Lane N Mayerling Rios
5541 Morgan Avenue N 5541 Morgan Ave LLC
5818 June Avenue N Herman Capital Partners VII, LLC
5842 Washburn Avenue N Pryde Real Estate Solutions
6601 Unity Avenue N Cel Monton LLC
6737 Camden Avenue N Ronald F Jasicki
6749 Humboldt Avenue N Patrick Nguyen
7193 Unity Avenue N Mary R Turcotte
6c. RESOLUTION NO. 2024-89; APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
BROOKLYN CENTER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION BY-
LAWS
6d. RESOLUTION NO. 2024-90; REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR THE CITY
MANAGER TO SIGN A PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR A USED FIRE
ENGINE
6e. RESOLUTION NO. 2024-91; AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, PROJECT NO. 2026-01,
HUMBOLDT AVE (COUNTY ROAD 57) RECONSTRUCTION (53RD TO
57TH) PROJECT
6f. RESOLUTION NO. 2024-91; ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND
CALLING FOR AN IMPROVEMENT PUBLIC HEARING FOR
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2025-02, 67TH AVENUE AND JAMES
AVENUE MILL & OVERLAY
Motion passed unanimously.
7. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS
None.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
8a. AN ORDINANCE NO. 2024-10; AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 12 AND 19 OF
THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING PROPERTY
9/23/24 -4- DRAFT
MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS AND COMMERCIAL VEHICLE STORAGE
- SECOND READING
City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited Community Development Director
Jesse Anderson to make the staff presentation.
Community Development Director Jesse Anderson explained the first reading of the Ordinance
was held on August 12, 2024, and the Work Session was held on April 22, 2024. The proposed
changes are to Chapter 12 and Chapter 19, which include proposals for requiring mailboxes at all
licensed rental properties, commercial addressing requirements, and the changes to the definition
of commercial vehicles.
Mr. Anderson stated the proposed changes for Chapter 12 include mailbox requirements for
licensed rental properties. Inspection Staff has received complaints about multi-family properties
not replacing mailboxes which leads to mail delivery being held at the post office.
Mr. Anderson pointed out there are currently no requirements for mailboxes. Federal and State
regulations dictate the size, location, and type of mailbox but do not require properties to have a
mailbox. The proposal would be for the City to require that all rental properties are required to
provide a mailbox that meets Federal and State requirements for their tenants.
Mr. Anderson noted the City does not have an ordinance that specifies a size for the addressing of
a commercial or retail building. Residential buildings have requirements outlined in the Building
Code and in the International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC). Staff has looked into the
building code and the building code is silent on the matter. The proposed changes would only
impact retail and commercial properties and inserted into Chapter 12. One-story commercial
buildings would require the address to be 12 inches, 18 inches for two stories, and 24 inches for
three-story buildings and taller.
Mr. Anderson added that commercial vehicle storage in a residential district is enforced in both
Chapter 19 Public Nuisance and Petty Offenses and Chapter 35 Unified Development. Since the
adoption of the Unified Development Code in 2023, the definitions of commercial vehicles do not
match. The purpose of bringing this forward is to ensure that both definitions would be identical
and allow for smaller commercial vehicles to be stored in a residential district.
Mr. Anderson pointed out that currently, Chapter 19-103.12 identifies a commercial vehicle as a
vehicle that is “…a length greater than 21 feet, or a height greater than 8 feet, or a gross vehicle
weight greater than 9,000 pounds…” The proposed language would read as follows,
“Commercial vehicles will be defined as a vehicle length greater than 22 feet, a height greater
than 10 feet (measured from grade), or a gross vehicle weight more than 20,000 pounds.”
Mr. Anderson stated the newly adopted definition in chapter 35-5512.c only allows vehicles
identified as class 1-4 by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The proposed language
would allow small box trucks, step vans, and cube vans to be parked/stored in an R1 and R2
district. The language would continue to prohibit the storage of construction equipment, farm
9/23/24 -5- DRAFT
vehicles, dump trucks, construction trailers, backhoes, front-end loaders, bobcats, well drilling
equipment, farm trucks, combines, thrashers, tractors, tow trucks, and truck tractors.
Mayor Graves asked if there are any Ordinances regarding storage containers. Mr. Anderson
confirmed there are Ordinances restricting the use of storage containers, and the uses are different
depending on the type of property. Some properties may have been grandfathered in with previous
rules for accessory buildings.
Councilmember Jerzak asked if there was an opportunity to amend the Ordinance. Mr. Anderson
stated the item could be tabled to allow for revisions. However, the motion itself could include
minor changes.
Mayor Graves asked if it was legally permissible. City Attorney Cristina Cruz-Jennings confirmed
Mr. Anderson’s explanation was correct.
Councilmember Jerzak stated he could support the proposed changes to Chapter 19-103.12. He
requested the Council reconsider the commercial vehicle restrictions to add four feet to the length.
The Ordinance is virtually impossible to enforce. Additionally, food trucks can be longer than the
proposed length. Food trucks are often owned by minority business owners and don’t need
additional expenses for food truck storage. The proposed Ordinance is less restrictive than what
the City currently has, but they need to consider all food trucks.
Councilmember Butler stated she wants to support food trucks. However, larger trucks park on
the street and may create safety issues. There is additional wear and tear on the roads from the
large trucks.
Councilmember Jerzak stated he agrees with Councilmember Butler’s concerns about safety. It is
the role of the Police Department to handle parking violations that impact safety. Box trucks are
excluded from the proposed Ordinance. No matter what, there isn’t street parking allowed 2:00
a.m. to 6:00 a.m. He hasn’t heard complaints about food trucks, but he has heard complaints about
semi-trucks, box trucks, and the like.
Councilmember Kragness stated there needs to be a line drawn somewhere. She doesn’t oppose
food trucks.
Mr. Anderson stated that minor amendments could be made if the Council would like.
Mayor Graves asked if the number of food trucks in the City was considered. Mr. Anderson stated
there is not an inventory of food trucks in the City.
Councilmember Kragness asked how the length was chosen by Staff for the amendment. Mr.
Anderson stated Staff didn’t measure every food truck in the City. Instead, th ey measured a
handful of food trucks and other common vehicles that Staff has seen frequently.
9/23/24 -6- DRAFT
Councilmember Kragness stated Staff should do more measurements to ensure the majority of
food trucks are allowed. Mr. Anderson pointed out most food trucks are not allowed under the
current Ordinance, so it is possible not all food trucks would be around the City for measurements.
It would take some time to inventory 7,700 properties and find all commercial vehicles.
Mayor Graves asked what the downside is for implementing a longer truck length. Mr. Anderson
stated there could be some parking on the grass, but that would be addressed in another ordinance.
Councilmember Jerzak pointed out there are quite a few ways that food trucks are restricted already
such as with height or vehicle type. Any violations are based on reports from the community. He
requested the additional four feet be added to the Ordinance. If there is an issue with a maximum
length of 26 feet then Staff can bring the item back to Council.
Mayor Graves noted the importance of having a Councilmember with code enforcement
experience.
Councilmember Butler stated she is open to the proposed changes due to the clarification regarding
box trucks.
Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to open the Public Hearing.
Motion passed unanimously.
Kevin S. stated trucks that are currently stored elsewhere may be stored in Brooklyn Center should
the Ordinance change.
Lori B. asked if there could be an exception for current business owners to follow a longer truck
rule. Mayor Graves noted her agreement. There are issues with grandfathering some people in
because it gets confusing. The City also doesn’t know who does and who doesn’t have longer
trucks currently.
Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded to close the Public
Hearing.
Motion passed unanimously.
Councilmember Jerzak moved and Mayor Graves seconded to approve the second reading and
adopt ORDINANCE NO. 2024-10; Amending Chapter 12 of the City Code of Ordinance by
Adding Sections 12-309 and 12-310 regarding Property Maintenance Standards with an
amendment to allow trucks up to 26 feet in length.
Motion passed unanimously.
9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
9a. AN ORDINANCE NO. 2024-011; AMENDING SECTION 35-4103 (ALLOWED USE
9/23/24 -7- DRAFT
TABLE) OF THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING PLACES FOR
RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY IN THE BUSINESS MIXED-USE (MX-B) DISTRICT -
FIRST READING
Dr. Edwards introduced the item and invited Planning Manager Ginny McIntosh to co ntinue the
presentation. Ms. McIntosh provided an overview of zoning text amendment proposed by
Applicant Trinity International Fellowship regarding Section 35-4103 of the City Code of
Ordinances, and as outlined under Planning Commission Application No. 2024-011, that would
allow for Places for Religious Assembly as a conditional use within the Business Mixed-Use (MX-
B) District.
Ms. McIntosh stated per Section 35-71301, an amendment of the City’s Unified Development
Ordinance (UDO) may be initiated by the Council, Planning Commission, or a City property
owner. The use is currently permitted as a conditional use in the City’s R1, R2, C, and I districts.
A public hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on August 29, 2024. Mail
notifications were sent to 36 property owners and physical addresses within the Business Mixed-
Use District. A public hearing notice was also published on the City’s website.
Ms. McIntosh stated August 2023, City Council held a concept review of a proposal to allow for
places for religious assembly in the Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) District. City Staff presented the
proposal to City Council, identifying points to consider regarding a proposed conversion of 6010
Earle Brown Drive from office use to a place for religious assembly, and potential impacts to other
properties located within the MX-B District, of which in part included parking and traffic concerns
and considerations for the greater MX-B District.
Ms. McIntosh stated the applicant has spent the past year fundraising and working on plans for a
potential buildout of the property. If the amendment is approved, the applicant would still need to
enter into a purchase agreement with the property owner and receive separate approval of a
conditional use permit (CUP). Conditional uses are generally permitted uses so long as certain
conditions are met with respect to the mitigating of potentially negative impacts on neighboring
properties for uses already permitted.
Ms. McIntosh showed the Allowed Use Table and its proposed changes. She also showed the
property of interest on a map with 2040 Planned Land Use Designations.
Ms. McIntosh pointed out that the City’s Business Mixed-Use land use is a new designation under
the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan and includes properties located along Earle Brown Drive and
north of I-694 off Freeway Boulevard and Shingle Creek Parkway. Adoption of the City’s Unified
Development Ordinance in January 2023 resulted in the retirement of the City’s long-standing I1
(Industrial Park) District, and it was, for the most part, replaced with the City’s Business Mixed-
Use District.
Ms. McIntosh stated the designation encouraged redevelopment or development of commercial,
office, general business, and light industrial uses in coordination with supporting retail or
commercial uses to encourage a more dynamic and connected experience for workers.
9/23/24 -8- DRAFT
Ms. McIntosh noted the City is predominantly reserved for low-density residential, such as R1,
and there are limited opportunities for any new or expected additional employment opportunities
with the exception of certain land use designations.
Ms. McIntosh explained while the district’s predecessor, the I1 District, was very much a typical
business park/light industrial district, in that the uses were limited to manufacturing activities,
wholesale trade activities, service activities, public transportation terminals, foundries, and textile
mills, with retail permitted via special use as an accessory use only.
Ms. McIntosh stated new MX-B District does grant new flexibilities in use by allowing for non-
residential educational uses like business and trade schools, medical and health uses, brewpubs,
micro-wineries and distilleries, restaurants, grocery stores, indoor recreational fitness, and
hospitality lodging. However, these uses function differently than a place for religious assembly
might in that they are oftentimes centered around service times, and oftentimes operate outside of
typical business hours.
Ms. McIntosh stated the only example of a religious assembly use in a commercial area. The
building was formerly a veterinary hospital turned mosque at 4900 France Avenue North. Prior to
this, all places for religious assembly required primary vehicular access to be located on a collector
or arterial street in order to manage traffic volumes as people arrive and leave service. The mosque
is located on a dead-end cul-de-sac and, although a parking and traffic study was provided as part
of their special use application, with plans to operate a shuttle given limited on-site parking, their
conditions of approval are not being met and City staff has noted on-street parking during service
times, which constrains emergency vehicle access to the property’s sole access, access to
neighboring industrial businesses and residential homes, as well as parking occurring off-site at
the Xcel Transformer Station. As its location is not served by sidewalks, this
also forces members to walk in the City streets or across private properties.
Ms. McIntosh pointed out assembly uses, such as religious institutions, tend to have higher parking
demands than other types of uses due to the nature of their visitors. Industrial uses by contrast tend
to have low parking demands relative to their square footage because these uses generally have
lower employment densities, although the 2040 Comprehensive Plan seeks to add employment
intensity to the B-MU land use designation.
Ms. McIntosh stated places of public assembly, such as houses of worship, theatres, auditoriums,
mortuaries, stadiums, arenas, and dance halls require one parking space for every three seats, or
attendees, per Section 35-5506 under the City’s Unified Development Ordinance. Conversely,
industry and wholesale uses, as are more typically found in the City’s MX-B District, require one
space for every two employees based upon maximum planned employment during any work period
or one space for every 800 square feet of gross floor area, whichever requirement is greater. In the
event the latter requirement is greater, adequate land area shall be provided for the required off-
street parking area, but improved space need only be provided according to the employees ratio.
Ms. McIntosh showed images of the existing buildings. In reviewing the City’s existing MX-B
District properties, it was noted that the majority of properties are home to uses traditionally found
9/23/24 -9- DRAFT
in a business park/light industrial district. These include Medtronic, Endurable Building Products,
Hiawatha Rubber, Revival, RAO Manufacturing, the former Metro Transit Reuter Bus Garage,
and the City’s Public Works Garage. The majority of these properties are located on minor
roadways that are intended to provide access for employees, trucking, and logistics, with loading
docks, gated access, or outside storage present. Although there are some properties that do not fit
this description, these are the existing conditions for many of the 36 properties within the MX-B
District.
Ms. McIntosh added there are certain barriers that would also require consideration in retrofitting
industrial or office type buildings or tenant spaces for “assembly” type uses as they require higher
fire suppression standards than other types of uses due to the congregation of people that occurs
within buildings and the potential need for exiting in case of an emergency. Conversion of a
standalone building or tenant space would likely constitute a change of use from the perspective
of the Building and Fire Code and thus would trigger a change of use from the perspective of the
Building and Fire Code.
Ms. McIntosh stated in the case of the few multi-tenant office buildings located off Earle Brown
Drive and within the MX-B District, their building type could restrict the location of a proposed
place for religious assembly t ype use. For example, on a 2B construction-type building, an
assembly use could not be located higher than the third floor. In reviewing the standards for
approving an ordinance amendment, the proposed amendment shall be consistent with and
compatible with surrounding land use classifications; whether the proposal demonstrates merit
beyond the interests of an owner or, in this case, an interested party, for an individual parcel. The
specific policies and recommendations as outlined within the City’s Comprehensive Plan or other
City plans.
Ms. McIntosh explained although this is not contemplated within this application, any applicant
pursuing a conditional use permit (CUP) for a “Places for Religious Assembly” use would further
need to satisfactorily demonstrate that all conditional use permit criteria as outlined under Section
35-7703 (Conditional Use Permit Criteria) has been meet. These criteria include, but are not
limited to whether: the establishment of the conditional use will impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district, that
adequate measures have been or will be taken so as to provide ingress, egress, and parking so
designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets, be in accordance with the general
objectives, or with any specific objective, of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Unified
Development Ordinance, and not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the
immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair
property values within the neighborhood.
Ms. McIntosh pointed out that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested
ordinance amendment on a 3-2 vote at their September 12, 2024 meeting. No members of the
public were present, nor were any comments submitted in advance of the meeting. The applicant
and representation from their architect were present.
9/23/24 -10- DRAFT
Ms. McIntosh stated the Planning Commissioners held a lengthy discussion on the uses allowed
within the MC-B district, its intended purpose, and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan land use
designation of B-MU. The Planning Commission asked a number of questions. They asked if the
Heritage Center was within this District. Staff confirmed the Heritage Center is a non-confirming
use under the 2040 Plan and UDO and it was not a like-for-like comparison. The Commission
asked whether event centers would be permitted within the MX-B District if “Places for Religious
Assembly” are permitted as event centers as accessory uses.
Ms. McIntosh explained the Planning Commission commented a “Places for Religious Assembly”
use may be beneficial to industrial businesses in that they would operate during the off hours. If
the City were to allow it, they could see what would happen. One Commissioner asked how Staff
plans to address violations at 4900 France which is the only “Places for Religious Assembly” used
in the District.
Ms. McIntosh added Commissioners asked how likely it was that other properties in the MX-B
District might convert to a “Places for Religious Assembly” use. While it cannot be a reason for
determination as part of a land use application and the Planning Commission 's scope of duties,
there were considerations as to how “Places for Religious Assembly” would strengthen the City’s
tax base. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan outlines the B-MU land use as the City’s greatest
opportunity to provide employment intensity and be competitive economically as a City.
Ms. McIntosh noted the Planning Commission expressed concerns regarding potential impacts to
existing light industrial businesses in Brooklyn Center, the City’s support and protection of them,
and whether introducing the proposed use would be consistent in providing “highest and best” uses
in the area of the City. Finally, there were concerns about potential spot zoning to allow for use at
a property of interest. Ms. McIntosh pointed out that the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the requested ordinance amendment on a 3-2 vote at their September 12, 2024 meeting.
Ms. McIntosh stated following the September Planning Commission meeting, the City Attorney
informed City Staff that a Bill was passed during the legislative session regarding “sacred
settlements” or “sacred communities.” The Bill went into effect on January 1, 2024. The Bill
requires cities to allow religious institutions to permit micro-unit dwellings on properties owned
by religious institutions as a permitted or conditional use regardless of the zoning district they are
located.
Ms. McIntosh explained the change is intended to provide additional means for faith communities
to serve chronically homeless and extremely low-income individuals in accordance with religious
vocations. Micro-units cannot exceed 400 square feet and must be built on a permanent chassis
and anchored. Other minimum requirements include access to water and electricity and access to
a common kitchen, toilet, bathing, and laundry consistent with boarding house requirements. City
Staff doesn’t have enough information to determine whether these micro-unit dwellings would be
of consideration or feasible on any of the properties within the MX-B District. Ms. McIntosh
showed photo examples of micro-units.
9/23/24 -11 - DRAFT
Ms. McIntosh concluded City Staff remains in the position that, based on the findings presented
within the provided report, the requested ordinance amendment should be denied. However, if
the City Council elects to recommend approval of the request to amend Section 35-4103 to allow
for Places for Religious Assembly as a conditional use in the Business Mixed-Use (MX-B)
District, the motion language would need to be amended to approve a first reading and set the
second reading of the ordinance amendment to October 14, 2024.
Councilmember Kragness asked how the violations at 4900 France are being addressed and how
the conditions are impacting Staff’s recommendation to deny the present application. Ms.
McIntosh stated Staff has been paying more attention to 4900 France because of the new
application. It will be handled by Code Enforcement Staff and law enforcement.
Councilmember Kragness stated it is unfair for a new applicant to be hindered by another entity’s
violations. Ms. McIntosh confirmed the two situations are being handled separately. The issues
at 4900 France were only mentioned because it is the most similar use to the proposal. City Staff
is working with other religious assemblies to expand as they are bigger than they used to be. There
are requests for large auditoriums, schools, or call centers. Councilmember Kragness noted the
interest in expansion is a good thing.
Councilmember Jerzak explained he doesn’t like special permits or uses because each applicant
would believe they are entitled to special treatment. He also supports the recommendation from
Staff as they are professionals. He noted it is unclear if the entity is seeking tax -exempt status.
The Planning Commission referenced the use may be beneficial to the tax base, but that has not
been confirmed.
Mayor Graves asked if Staff had received complaints regarding the mosque. Ms. McIntosh
confirmed they have received complaints from neighboring businesses about the mosque.
Mayor Graves asked if Staff would have the same recommendation to deny the application if the
UDO wasn’t in place. Ms. McIntosh explained there was such a big gap between the previous
code and the updated code. In 2019, the UDO guided the property as B-MU. The UDO is in line
with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
Mayor Graves asked for clarification on the restrictions of the UDO. Ms. McIntosh stated th at
Section 35-4103 of the Unified Development Ordinance outlines manufacturing, assembly, and
processing of products, wholesale trade, foundries, and textile mills and mills products as uses
only allowed or permitted by conditional use in the City’s MX-B and I Districts.
Nyenatee Davis, Pastor of Trinity International Fellowship, introduced himself.
Councilmember Jerzak asked what tax status the church plans to seek out. Mr. Davis explained
they are working with an attorney to determine their tax status.
Mayor Graves asked how long Trinity has been operating and how many attendees it has. Mr.
Davis stated Trinity has been operating for five years, and they have around 128 regular attendees.
9/23/24 -12- DRAFT
Mayor Graves asked which building they were discussing. Ms. McIntosh showed an image of the
building being considered. There is one user, MinMor Industries, but they have shifted their
employees to primarily remote work. At most, there are about 20 employees on-site.
Mayor Graves asked if Trinity had any employees. Mr. Davis stated there are four employees.
Mayor Graves explained it is difficult to make decisions regarding conditional use permits,
especially when a property isn’t owned by the City. The City needs a larger tax base and they need
to be careful about how existing properties are redeveloped. However, they don’t want buildings
to sit unused.
Councilmember Jerzak moved to deny the zoning text amendment proposed by Applicant Trinity
International Fellowship regarding Section 35-4103 (Allowed Use Table) of the City Code of
Ordinances, and as outlined under Planning Commission Application No. 2024-011, that would
allow for Places for Religious Assembly as a conditional use within the Business Mixed-Use (MX-
B) District.
The motion failed for lack of a second.
Mayor Graves asked if there has been other interest in the building, specifically for uses that would
employ people or generate taxes for the City. Ms. McIntosh stated other interests cannot be used
in the decision-making process. In general, the B-MU and I Districts have been at a disadvantage
for business and industrial uses because the buildings are older and don’t meet modern building
standards for such uses. Many of the properties will need to be redeveloped, but there are some
larger uses such as MedTronic that have found value in the area. There are limitations for assembly
uses in office buildings along Earle Brown Drive because City Code will not allow for use above
the third floor for assembly. There is great visibility for the area because of the bricks and its
proximity to the highway.
Councilmember Jerzak asked if taxes are currently being paid by the owner. Ms. McIntosh stated
the current use is not exempt.
Councilmember Jerzak suggested the item be tabled to allow for more information gathering. He
requested information on the tax status of the proposed use. Ultimately, he doesn’t want to set a
precedent or ignore Staff’s recommendation.
Mayor Graves stated there could be a use similar to Resurrecting Faith World Ministries. Ms.
McIntosh noted a caveat of the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) funds for Resurrecting Faith World
Ministries was to create a for-profit arm because the City’s Economic Development Authority
owned the property.
Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to table consideration of the
zoning text amendment proposed by Applicant Trinity International Fellowship regarding Section
35-4103 (Allowed Use Table) of the City Code of Ordinances, and as outlined under Planning
9/23/24 -13- DRAFT
Commission Application No. 2024-011, that would allow for Places for Religious Assembly as a
conditional use within the Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) District.
Motion passed unanimously.
Dr. Edwards asked for the Council to notify Staff of information they would like presented on the
item. Mayor Graves stated she would like more information regarding the new Bill regarding
“sacred settlements” or “sacred communities.”
Councilmember Jerzak stated he would like information on the current tax status of the building,
the tax status of the proposed use, details on why Staff recommended the denial, and any
implications from setting a precedent through allowing the application.
10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS
10a. RESOLUTION NO. 2024-93; APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY 2025
PROPERTY TAX LEVY AND RESOLUTION NO. 2024-94; PRELIMINARY
BUDGET
City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and provided a presentation. He thanked Staff
for their work on the budget and levy. He explained the purpose of the presentation is to present
the 2025 preliminary levy and budget, provide insight into the factors that guided the development
of the 2025 preliminary and levy budget, provide budget highlights, note fiscal analysis and
impacts, and explain next steps.
Dr. Edwards noted on May 6, 2024, there was a Joint Work Session for the City Council and
Finance Commission to discuss Capital Improvement Plan and Capital Funds. August 19, 2024,
there was another Joint Work Session which included budget request presentations by Department
leaders, debt service, and the Central Garage.
Dr. Edwards pointed out that on November 18, 2024, the City Council and Finance Commission
will have a Joint Work Session to cover budget request presentations on EDA, utilities, Enterprise
Funds, and Grant Funds. Finally, on December 2, 2024, there will be a meeting to adopt the 2025
budget and levy.
Dr. Edwards explained the mission of Brooklyn Center is to actively provide a safe, welcoming,
and inclusive community. In pursuit of the vision of one Brooklyn Center, the City will provide
high-quality, equitable city services that demonstrate we are inclusive and welcoming. Through
its actions, the City will establish an engaged relationship with the community. This includes
increasing the safety and well-being of residents, City employees, businesses, and visitors while
adding a wide range of economic development improvements. All this leads to a renewed sense
of pride in the City, its physical condition, and its aesthetics.
Dr. Edwards noted guiding factors for the budget include recognizing unprecedented events and
challenges faced by residents and staff over the past few years, the economic condition and the tax
9/23/24 -14- DRAFT
capacity of residents, and an intent to balance the needs for economic growth, health , and well‐
being of people, longer‐term fiscal stability, pursuit of City Council direction, and providing City
services at an affordable cost for residents.
Dr. Edwards stated the initial request from Departments would require a 14.22 percent levy.
However, the budget was pared down to a proposed 8.96 percent. The basic costs such as debt
service, salary and benefit increases, and other inflation considerations, would require a levy
higher than 8.96 percent. Staff was asked to be creative about cutting funds in their Departments
to lower the levy further.
Dr. Edwards explained a $2.2 million investment includes $1 million for a three percent wages and
benefits increase, $161,440 for a gap fill, $239,000 for a 24-hour Fire Duty Crew, $40,000 for
service performance analysis, $100,00 for salary wage competitiveness, $515,000 for capital
infrastructure bonding, then $136,000 for other costs.
Dr. Edwards noted there were $1.3 million in reductions and adjustments. Administrative transfers
accounted for $291,000, one-time funding provided $106,000, there was $35,000 from
Entertainment in the Park and the Juneteenth celebration, $9,400 from interns and seasonal
workers, $50,000 from a reduction in salary competitiveness, $64,000 from overtime limits,
$112,000 from freezing Parks and Recreation outreach efforts, reducing prevention and
intervention efforts by $25,000, City-wide landscaping for $75,000, redirecting reserve
contributions by $231,000, $55,000 for maintenance on Brooklyn Boulevard, $84,000 for a shared
administrative assistant, and an additional $177,600 of miscellaneous reductions.
Dr. Edwards pointed out the 8.96 percent levy equates to $2,189,494 including the bonding. Staff
is looking for new revenue streams and overall economic growth of the City.
Director of Fiscal and Support Services Angela Holm explained the City’s current budget policies
provide a basic framework and assist in the decision-making process. Policies include a balanced
budget, current revenue should pay for current expenses, contingency of up to five percent of
the budget, providing adequate funding for capital replacement and maintenance, the budget
should describe goals, services and programs, and a targeted unassigned General Fund balance of
50 to 52 percent of the next year’s General Fund budget.
Ms. Holm noted there are also revenue policies that direct how the City maintains the ability to
pay for services it provides its customers. The policies include maintaining a diversified and sta-
ble revenue system, an annual revenue estimates completed through an objective conservative
analytical process, user fees should be reviewed and revised on an annual basis, fees and user
charges for Enterprise Funds should fully support total direct and indirect costs, and user fees for
City services will generally be established at a level which will recover the full cost of providing
the service.
Ms. Holm showed a graph of the median value homes in the City over the years. The value has
been steadily increasing since 2014. The median home value in 2024 is $272,100, which is a
slight increase from 2023’s median home value. She also showed a list of median home values
9/23/24 -15- DRAFT
in comparison to other cities. Brooklyn Center has a lower median home value than Golden
Valley, New Hope, Richfield, Crystal, and Robbinsdale. The median home values in nearby
neighborhoods in Minneapolis are slightly lower than in Brooklyn Center.
Ms. Holm showed a table with taxable market value estimates. Overall, there is a 0.6 percent
increase from 2024 to 2025. Industrial has somewhat increased, which allowed the residential
tax capacity to decrease and carry less of the burden.
Ms. Holm pointed out a property tax levy increase or decrease of one percent is approximately
$244,000 in revenue. The total payable levy from 2024 was around $24.4 million. The
estimated total levy for 2024 is $26,625,814, which is an 8.96 percent increase. The numbers
would be recalculated should the Council move forward with the proposed levy.
Ms. Holm also showed a pie chart for the annual cost of government in Brooklyn Center for the
median home. For example, the Police Department costs the median household $612 and
the Fire Department costs $150.
Ms. Holm then showed a slide with projected property tax impacts for 2025. With an 8.96
percent levy, the median single-family household would see an increase of $97 in the City
portion of taxes for the year. Each percent of the levy would add or decrease $14 for the average
single-family household.
Ms. Holm reiterated on November 18, 2024, the City Council and Finance Commission will have
a Joint Work Session to cover budget request presentations on EDA, utilities, Enterprise Funds,
and Grant Funds. Finally, on December 2, 2024, there will be a meeting to adopt the 2025 budget
and levy.
Dr. Edwards noted there are a number of scenarios that could impact the levy. First, if the City
were to receive the SAFER (Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response) Grant, the levy
could be reduced to 7.96 percent. If Brooklyn Center received the Grant and restored some cuts
that are reoccurring costs, then the levy could stay at 8.96 percent. If the City doesn’t receive the
SAFER Grant, they could reduce the levy to 7.96 percent by postponing the 24-hour Fire Duty
Crew or freeze other personnel. Alternatively, the budget and levy could stay as presented at 8.96
percent without the Grant.
Councilmember Kragness asked how much the SAFER Grant would be for. Fire Chief Berg stated
the grant would be $1.3 million for three years.
Councilmember Butler asked what impacts Brooklyn Center would see should the Duty Crew be
postponed. Dr. Edwards stated they would seek out the SAFER Grant again and wait until a future
budget cycle to implement a Duty Crew. In 2024, two positions were budgeted for. The Duty
Crew requires five personnel, so the Crew couldn’t be implemented without additional funds. The
two positions have not been hired for.
9/23/24 -16- DRAFT
Fire Chief Berg pointed out that 8,790 hours need to be covered by the Duty Crew throughout the
year.
Councilmember Kragness stated the Grant would be for $1.3 million for three years. If the levy
were to go down one percent, there would be a decrease in the budget by $244,000. However, the
Grant is much higher than a one percent change. Ms. Holm stated the SAFER Grant would cover
three additional personnel. The levy could go down by at least one percent because the SAFER
Grant would provide $433,000 per year. Staff would need to determine if the three years could be
lengthened to use the funds to create more gradual funding for the program.
Councilmember Jerzak noted Staff is in a hard position to make a lot of cuts while they have
interest in growing their programs. Employees are also unsure if their positions will remain
funded. The Council must consider the tax impacts and rent impacts of a steep levy along with the
population in Brooklyn Center. In an ideal scenario, there would be no levy.
Councilmember Jerzak stated Brooklyn Center has been promising a Duty Crew to its residents.
The overtime and on-call efforts for employees is unsustainable.
Councilmember Jerzak pointed out that the increase for taxpayers would be more than 8.96 percent
considering the County taxes, schools, and the potential referendum. There is a comment in the
budget that alludes to an increase in utility costs as well.
Councilmember Jerzak added another concern is the lack of money in the Emergency Fund, and
there isn’t enough being put into it with the proposed budget. He would like to see any excess
funds from underspending or frozen positions be attributed to the Emergency Fund.
Dr. Edwards explained the Emergency Fund is to address issues such as a bridge collapse.
However, there are other reserves. The City is somewhat short of its six months of reserves, but
that is a guiding tenet rather than a requirement.
Councilmember Jerzak noted on page 95, there was a transfer to the Economic Development
Authority (EDA) budget. He asked why the transfer was made. Dr. Edwards stated the transfer
was to promote balance. It is a top priority to grow the economy and maintain Staff, but they also
hope to keep the levy low. The permit fees were decreased for development. They hope to grow
their resources within the EDA.
Councilmember Jerzak stated he tries to understand the budget in a way he can easily explain to
neighbors. The monthly cost for public safety is less than $10 for the average household, and
people can get behind that.
Councilmember Kragness asked why Common Sense was moved from professional services to
other services. Ms. Holm explained the State has identified a number of services that are
considered professional services. Previously, Staff would put miscellaneous services under
professional services. Now miscellaneous services are categorized under other services. The goal
9/23/24 -17- DRAFT
is to align their finances more closely to the State’s chart of accounts. It is a painful transition, but
it will even out over the years.
Councilmember Kragness noted she didn’t realize there was an 80 percent increase. There may
have been a typo due to a discrepancy. She asked what else is included in an 80 percent increase
in the contract. Ms. Holm stated she would need to review the contract again to provide the most
accurate answer.
Mayor Graves stated her preferred scenario would be to keep the levy at 8.96 percent even if the
SAFER Grant were received. The City’s work around economic development is under-resourced.
Brooklyn Center needs to bring in more money to offset the tax burden on the residents.
Community Development funds only represent a small percentage of the services, but it needs to
have a higher priority because it would help to fund the other services.
Councilmember Jerzak noted his agreement with Mayor Graves. The permit revenues tend to
offset Community Development’s costs. He added Council previously had a consensus to fund a
Duty Crew.
Councilmember Kragness stated she would like to reduce the levy to 7.96 percent if possible. She
thanked Staff for their work on the budget and pointed out the process is much clearer than
in previous years.
Councilmember Butler agreed the process was more efficient this year. She stated she would
support the scenario with 8.96 percent and the SAFER Grant. A lower levy would require a more
burdensome increase in future budget cycles.
Councilmember Jerzak stated he would like any restored funds to go toward the Emergency Fund.
In that scenario, he could support a levy of 8.96 percent with the SAFER Grant.
Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2024-
93 approving a preliminary tax capacity levy for the General Fund and Debt Service Fund and a
market value levy for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority for property taxes payable in
2025 and to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2024-94 approving a preliminary budget for the 2025
Fiscal Year.
Motion passed unanimously.
11. COUNCIL REPORT
Councilmember Butler reported on her attendance at the following and provided information on
the following upcoming events:
Participated in a ride-along with CEAP for meal delivery. She recommended the
experience.
9/23/24 -18- DRAFT
Councilmember Kragness reported on her attendance at the following and provided information
on the following upcoming events:
Participated in a ride-along with CEAP for meal delivery. She recommended the
experience. She provided details on the routes and scope of services. There are
opportunities to volunteer for deliveries.
Attended a trip to Albuquerque to learn about an extended response model. There was a
lot of collaboration in the model and focused on the specific needs of the community.
Services were even expanded to provide clothes for community members.
Pointed out that the deadline for Random Acts of Kindness is October 18, 2024.
Councilmember Jerzak reported on his attendance at the following and provided information on
the following upcoming events:
Attended the Fire Department 75th Anniversary and thanked Staff for their work on the
event.
Noted he has a one-to-one meeting set up with the Hwy 252 Task Force.
Met with community members regarding the budget.
Mayor Graves reported on her attendance at the following and provided information on the
following upcoming events:
Attended the Fire Department 75th Anniversary.
Recorded a Mayor’s Minutes video.
Attended an event at the Brooklyn Park Small Business Center.
Participated in an interview regarding Hwy 252.
Completed administrative work related to the Tourism Board.
Attended the Crime Prevention Federal Advocacy Committee through the National League
of Cities.
Met with Dr. Edwards.
Met with the various community residents.
12. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded adjournment of the City Council
meeting at 9:20 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
C ouncil R egular M eeng
DAT E:10/14/2024
TO :C ity C ouncil
F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager
T H R O U G H :Barb S uciu, A ssistant City Manager/C ity C lerk
BY:S hannon Pe,t, D eputy C ity C lerk
S U B J E C T:A pproval of Licens es
Requested Council A con:
- Moon to approve the licenses as presented.
B ackground:
The following bus inesses /persons have applied for C ity licens es as noted. Each bus iness/pers on has fulfilled
the requirements of the City O rdinance governing res pec5ve licenses , submi6ed appropriate applica5ons,
and paid proper fees. A pplicants for rental dwelling licens es are in compliance with C hapter 12 of the City
Code of O rdinances, unless comments are noted below the property address on the a6ached rental report.
M echanical
D rew C an D o! L L C
3322 277th Ave N W, I san5 55040
G lowing H earth and H ome
5391 12th Ave. E., S hakopee 55379
H ap E H omes
409 6th S t W, H as 5ngs 55033
Riccar H ea5ng & A /C
2387 S ta5on Parkway N W, A ndover 55304
S ayler H ea5ng & A ir C ondi5oning, I nc.
6520 Wes t Lake S t, S t. L ouis Park 55426
Total Refrigera5on
949 S o Concord S treet, S outh S t. Paul, 55075
S ign
Kaufman S ign Company
2714 Eas t 33rd S treet, M inneapolis 55406
B udget I ssues:
- None
I nclusive C ommunity Engagement:
- None
A nracist/Equity Policy Effect:
- None
AT TA C H M E N TS :
D escrip5on U pload D ate Type
Rental C riteria 6/20/2023 Backup M aterial
Rentals 10/8/2024 Backup M aterial
Page 2 of 2
b.Police Service Calls.
Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per
year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include
disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12-911, and events
categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including
homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, auto theft and arson.
Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the
victim and suspect are “Family or household members” as defined in the Domestic
Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (b) and where there is a
report of “Domestic Abuse” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes,
Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (a).
License
Category
Number of
Units
Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct
Service & Part I Crimes
(Calls Per Unit/Year)
No
Category
Impact
1-2 0-1
3-4 units 0-0.25
5 or more units 0-0.35
Decrease 1
Category
1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3
3-4 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1
5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50
Decrease 2
Categories
1-2 Greater than 3
3-4 units Greater than 1
5 or more units Greater than 0.50
Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria
License Category
(Based on Property
Code Only)
Number of Units Property Code Violations per
Inspected Unit
Type I – 3 Year 1-2 units 0-2
3+ units 0-0.75
Type II – 2 Year 1-2 units Greater than 2 but not more than 5
3+ units Greater than 0.75 but not more than 1.5
Type III – 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 5 but not more than 9
3+ units Greater than 1.5 but not more than 3
Type IV – 6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 9
3+ units Greater than 3
Location Address License Subtype Renewal/Initial Owner
Property
Code
Violations License Type Police CFS*
Final License
Type**
Previous
License
Type***
Consecutive
Type IV's
5300 Colfax Ave N Single Initial Thao Pha
12 Type IV N/A Type IV N/A 0
6015 Dupont Ave N Single Initial HOME TRS LLC
2 Type I N/A Type II N/A N/A
7130 France Ave N Single Initial FAYSAL SAID/ZAM ZAM ALI 16 Type IV 0 Type IV N/A 0
3407 65th Ave N
Multiple Family
6 Bldg 163 Units Renewal
Soderberg Investments Llc
Met Requirements
115 = 1.42 per
unit Type II 0 Type II Type III N/A
6101 Beard Ave N
Multiple Family
1 Bldg 81 Units Renewal
6939 Baird Llc Et Al C/o Rtg
Met Requirements
60 = 0.74 per
unit Type I 0 Type I Type III N/A
6109 Beard Ave N
Multiple Family
1 Bldg 3 Units Renewal
SIMONS REVOCABLE TRUST
Met Requirements
3 = 1 per unit Type II 0 Type II Type IV N/A
7015 Brooklyn Blvd
Multiple Family
2 Bldgs 58 Units Renewal
Willow Lane Estates Llc
Met Requirements
86 = 1.45 per
unit Type II 0 Type II Type III N/A
7200 Camden Ave N
Multiple Family
5 Bldgs 80 Units Renewal
Namaka Evergreen, LLC
Met Requirements
180 = 2.25 per
unit Type III 0 Type III Type IV N/A
700 58th Ave N Single Renewal
WILBUR HUBBARD
Did not meet requirements
0 Type I 0 Type IV Type IV 2
707 69th Ave N Single Renewal
SFR Borrower 2021-2 LLC
Met Requirements
1 Type I 0 Type I Type IV N/A
1513 Humboldt Pl N Single Renewal Johnson Organization Inc
0 Type I 0 Type I Type II N/A
2113 55th Ave N Single Renewal
Ih3 Property Minnesota Lp
Met Requirements
0 Type I 0 Type I Type IV N/A
2606 65th Ave N Single Renewal
Hpa Ii Borrower 2020-2 Llc
Did not meet requirements
1 Type I 0 Type IV Type IV 2
3141 49th Ave N Single Renewal
Ccf3 Llc
Met Requirements
2 Type I 0 Type I Type IV N/A
5112 70th Ave N Single Renewal
Ih3 Property Minnesota Lp
Met Requirements 3 Type II 0 Type II Type IV N/A
5250 Great View Ave N Single Renewal
Cosco Property 5 Llc
Met Requirements
1 Type I 0 Type I Type III N/A
Rental Licenses for Council Approval 10.14.24
5412 1/2 Fremont Ave N Single Renewal
Larry Johnson
Did not meet requirements 3 Type II 0 Type III Type III N/A
5535 Bryant Ave N Single Renewal
E H Mendoza & E C Coto Mejia
Met Requirements
4 Type II 0 Type II Type III N/A
5636 Humboldt Ave N Single Renewal
Gao Qiang Liu
Met Requirements
1 Type I 0 Type I Type III N/A
5713 Humboldt Ave N Single Renewal Janice Biorn
22 Type IV 0 Type IV Type I 0
5857 Colfax Ave N Single Renewal
Cel Monton Llc
Did not meet requirements
2 Type I 0 Type IV Type IV 2
5936 Zenith Ave N Single Renewal S Banks & D J Banks
0 Type I 0 Type I Type II N/A
6349 Halifax Dr Single Renewal
Qiang Kevin Fang
Met Requirements 2 Type I 0 Type I Type III N/A
6712 Beard Ave N Single Renewal
Mlmjr Properties & Invst Llc
Did not meet requirements
4 Type II 0 Type IV Type IV 4
7018 Irving Ave N Single Renewal
Omar A & Ayanna Adams
Did not meet requirements 31 Type IV 0 Type IV Type IV 2
7018 Irving Ave N Single Renewal
Omar A & Ayanna Adams
Did not meet requirements 2 Type II 0 Type IV Type IV 3
7222 Dallas Rd Single Renewal
HERMAN CAP PARTNERS
VIILLC
2 Type I 0 Type I Type II N/A
*CFS = Calls for service for renewal licenses only (Initial licenses are not applicable to CFS and will be listed as N/A)
**License type being issued
***Intial licenses will not show a Type I = 3 year, Type II = 2 year, Type III = 1 year, Type IV = 6 months
All properties are current on City utilities and property taxes
C ouncil R egular M eeng
DAT E:10/14/2024
TO :C ity C ouncil
F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager
T H R O U G H :N/A
BY:Barb S uciu, A ssistant City Manager/C ity C lerk
S U B J E C T:Res olu,on A ppoin,ng Elec,on J udges for the 2024 G eneral Elec,on
Requested Council A con:
- Moon to approve a resoluon appoinng elecon judges for the November 5, 2024, G eneral Elecon.
B ackground:
Minnes ota S tatutes, S ec,on 204 B.21, subdivis ion 2, requires elec,on judges to be appointed by the
governing body at least 25 days before the elec,on at which the elec,on judges w ill s erve. T
Minnes ota S tatutes, S ec,on 203 B.121, provides that the absentee ballot board may include staff trained as
elec,on judges . Becaus e the absentee ballot board accepts or rejects absentee ballots in such a ,mely
manner, it is impera,ve that C ity S taff be appointed to the abs entee ballot board.
B udget I ssues:
- none
I nclusive C ommunity Engagement:
- none
A nracist/Equity Policy Effect:
- none
S trategic Priories and Values:
P rovide quality s ervices w ith fair and equitable treatment
AT TA C H M E N TS :
D escrip,on U pload D ate Type
Res olu,on 9/19/2024 Backup M aterial
Exhibit A 9/19/2024 Backup M aterial
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE 2024
GENERAL ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 5, 2024
WHEREAS, the Primary Election is November 5, 2024; and
WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. 204B.21, subd. 2, requires that persons serving as election
judges be appointed by the Council at least 25 days before the election at which the election judges
will serve.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the
individuals named on the attached exhibit A and on file in the office of the City Clerk are appointed
to perform the duties of election judge and/or be appointed as the Brooklyn Center Absentee Ballot
Board election judges.
BE IT RESOLVED the City Council also appoints other individuals and all
members appointed to the Hennepin County Absentee Ballot Board as authorized under Minn.
Stat. 204B.21, subd. 2, under the direction of the Assistant City Manager/City Clerk, to serve as
members of the Brooklyn Center Absentee Ballot Board.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Assistant City Manager/City Clerk is with
this, authorized to make any substitutions or additions as deemed necessary.
September 23, 2024
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Assistant City Manager/City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Arneson, Susan Khan, Nahid
Beard, Walter Knudsen, Marilyn
Bennethum, Lynn Koenig, Patricia
Bennethum, Ted Lalim, Jeremy
Bentrud, Andrea Landt, Emma
Berg, Susie LeNeau, Peter
Betzler, William Leonard, Owen
Bittmann, Daryl Long, Stephen
Bueckers, Kenneth Merritt, Gayle
Bumgarner, Don Mesenbrink, Patty
Byron Barfknecht, Tricia Miller, Sheteea
Carr, Margaret Mitlyng, Deborah
Cary, Mary Mudek, Todd
Castonguay, Daniel Nelson, Kathleen
Christians, Carol Paine, Debbie
Cooper, Pat Parnjan, Justin
Cramer, Thomas Pelkey, Bruce
Crest, Dale Perreault, Dale
Dagner, Ryan Peterson, Vanissa
Danek, Cathy Pettit, Shannon
DeRosier, Jon Phillips, Marie
Donkers, William Piekarczyk, Gary
Einberger McDonough, Wendi Saathoff, Holly
Ellgren, Kathryn Scherber, Kevin
Epps, Myra Shallenberger, Jane
Esele, Chidiebere Sharpe, Elizabeth
Fikes, Lillian Shepard, Devon
Gersetich, Mary Shibley, Paulette
Gilyard, Leslie Shold, Stephanie
Green, Carolyn Smith, Deborah
Hancock, Allan Smuk, Melanie
Hanna, Melody Steinhaus, Charles
Henrichs, Philip Stethem, Beverly
Higgins, Sherry Suciu, Barb
Holmes-Morris, Quincia Sullivan, Molly
Huot, Lori Sullivan, Timothy
Hurley, Charles Thomas, Julius
Ishola, Taofeek Truran, Beverly
Johnson, Charlene Turner, Yvonne
Johnson, Kirk Varhol, Cole
Jones, Christina Varhol, Paula
Jones, Stephanie Weaver, Thomas
Juul, Laura Wilks, Sarah
EXHIBIT A
Election Judges
Kallio, Julie
C ouncil R egular M eeng
DAT E:10/14/2024
TO :C ity C ouncil
F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager
T H R O U G H :N/A
BY:Todd Berg - F ire C hief/Emergency Manager
S U B J E C T:Res olu.on Reques.ng A dop.ng of the H ennepin C ounty A ll-C ounty M i.ga.on P lan
Requested Council A con:
- Moon to adopt the Hennepin County All-Hazard Migaon Plan.
B ackground:
H az ard mi.ga.on can be defined as , “to reduce or alleviate the loss of life, personal injury, and property
damage that can result from a dis aster through both long and short-term s trategies”. I t involves s trategies
s uch as planning, policy changes , programs , projects , and other ac.vi.es that can mi.gate the impacts of
hazards. The responsibility for haz ard mi.ga.on lies w ith many, including private property ow ners ;
bus iness and indus try; and local, s tate, and federal government.
The purpos e of this plan is to iden.fy the County ’s major haz ards , as s ess the vulnerability, and to reduce
risk us ing a variety of data and best prac.ce meas ures to implement mi.ga.on projects . This plan
iden.fies goals, objec.ves, recommended ac.ons , and cos ts by reviewing and working on ini.a.ves with
each county jurisdic.on or partner to reduce and/prevent injury and damage from haz ardous events. The
intent of the P lan is to provide unified guidance for coordina.ng mi.ga.on efforts prior to or following a
major emergency/dis aster by implemen.ng an on-going comprehensive county hazard mi.ga.on
s trategy intended to reduce the impact of loss of life and property due to effects of natural hazards.
Through con.nued collabora.on w ith each juris dic.on by providing staff exper.se, support, training and
educa.on opportuni.es , H ennepin County Emergency Management will con.nue to increas e its
res iliency to minimiz e the effects of natural hazards.
B udget I ssues:
By approving this plan, it w ould make us eligible for federal dollars in mi.ga.ng haz ards as well as, financial
assistance following emergency declara.ons of s uch hazards that effect Brooklyn C enter.
I nclusive C ommunity Engagement:
A nracist/Equity Policy Effect:
S trategic Priories and Values:
Maintain and enhance public places, I mprove community and employee s afety, Be an effec.ve partner w ith
other public en..es
AT TA C H M E N TS :
D escrip.on U pload D ate Type
Res olu.on 10/4/2024 Cover Memo
P lan sec.on 1 10/4/2024 Cover Memo
P lan sec.on 2 10/4/2024 Cover Memo
P lan sec.on 3 10/4/2024 Cover Memo
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO._______________
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ADOPTING THE HENNEPIN COUNTY
ALL-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has participated in the hazard mitigation
planning process as established under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, and
WHEREAS, the Act establishes a framework for the development of a multi -
jurisdictional County Hazard Mitigation Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Act as part of the planning process requires public involvement
and local coordination among neighboring local units of government and businesses; and
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Plan includes a risk assessment including past
hazards, hazards that threaten the County, an estimate of structures at risk, a general description of
land uses and development trends; and
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Plan includes a mitigation strategy including
goals and objectives and an action plan identifying specific mitigation projects and costs; and
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Plan includes a maintenance or implementation
process including plan updates, integration of the plan into other planning documents and how
Hennepin County will maintain public participation and coordination; and
WHEREAS, the Plan has been shared with the Minnesota Division of Homeland
Security and Emergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for
review and comment; and
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan will make the
county and participating jurisdictions eligible to receive FEMA hazard mitigation assistance
grants; and
WHEREAS, this is a multi-jurisdictional Plan and cities that participated in the
planning process may choose to also adopt the County Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, that the City of Brooklyn Center supports the hazard mitigation planning effort and
wishes to adopt the Hennepin County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan.
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
October 14, 2024
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
2024 HENNEPIN COUNTY
MULTI‐JURISDICTIONAL
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
VOLUME 1
Background and County Profile
01 February 2024
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
HENNEPIN COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, Minnesota 55304
February 1, 2024
On behalf of Hennepin County Emergency Management (HCEM), we are pleased to present the
2024 Hennepin County Multi‐Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan.
The purpose of this plan is to identify the Counties major hazards, assess the vulnerability, and
to reduce risk using a variety of data and best practice measures to implement mitigation
projects. This plan identifies goals, objectives, recommended actions, and costs by reviewing and
working on initiatives with each county jurisdiction or partner to reduce and/prevent injury and
damage from hazardous events. The intent of the Plan is to provide unified guidance for
coordinating mitigation efforts prior to or following a major emergency/disaster by implementing
an on‐going comprehensive county hazard mitigation strategy intended to reduce the impact of
loss of life and property due to effects of natural hazards.
Through continued collaboration with each jurisdiction by providing staff expertise, support,
training and education opportunities, Hennepin County Emergency Management will continue
to increase its resiliency to minimize the effects of natural hazards.
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
TABLE OF CONTENTS - VOLUME 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... 5
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 9
1.1. PLAN DESCRIPTION AND REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................... 9
SECTION 2: PLAN PURPOSE, AUTHORITY AND ADOPTION .............................................................. 11
2.1. AUTHORITY .................................................................................................................................. 11
2.2. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 11
2.3. PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 11
2.4. ADOPTION ................................................................................................................................... 11
SECTION 3: PLANNING PROCESS ...................................................................................................... 13
3.1. WHY PREPARE THIS PLAN‐ THE BIG PICTURE ............................................................................. 13
3.2. HENNEPIN COUNTIES RESPONSE TO THE DMA ......................................................................... 14
3.3. PURPOSE FOR PLANNING ........................................................................................................... 14
3.4. WHO WILL BENEFIT FROM THIS PLAN ....................................................................................... 14
3.5. PLAN UPDATE ‐ THE PLANNING PROCESS .................................................................................. 15
3.6. PLAN ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES ............................................................................................ 17
3.7. WHY PLAN ................................................................................................................................... 18
3.8. THE UPDATED PLAN‐ WHAT IS DIFFERENT ................................................................................. 18
3.9. SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS .......................................................................... 18
3.10. ORGANIZATION OF THE PLAN .................................................................................................. 19
3.11. PLANNING OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................. 20
3.12. ESTABLISH A REGIONAL REVIEW WORKING GROUP ............................................................... 20
3.13. FORMING A MITIGATION PLANNING TEAM ............................................................................ 21
3.14. COORDINATE WITH OTHER AGENCIES ..................................................................................... 22
3.15. REVIEW OF EXISTING PROGRAMS ............................................................................................ 22
3.16. PLAN DEVELOPMENT CHRONOLOGY/MILESTONES ................................................................ 23
3.17. DEVELOP A RISK ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................. 25
3.18. HCEM REGIONAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING REFERENCE COLLECTION .......... 25
3.19. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT‐ENGAGING THE PUBLIC ...................................................................... 27
3.20. STRATEGIES TO INFORM THE PUBLIC ....................................................................................... 27
3.21. SOCIAL MEDIA AND DIGITAL MEDIA PRESS RELEASE .............................................................. 29
3.22. SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE ......................................................................................................... 31
3.23. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT RESULTS .............................................................................................. 31
3.24. STAKEHOLDER AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN .................................................................. 31
3.25. GOALS FOR STAKEHOLDER AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ........................................................ 31
3.26. OUTREACH ACTIVITIES AND PARTICIPATION ........................................................................... 32
SECTION 4: COUNTY PROFILE ........................................................................................................... 33
4.1. HENNEPIN COUNTY GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................... 33
4.2. PHYSICAL FEATURES .................................................................................................................... 34
4.3. DIVERSITY .................................................................................................................................... 35
4.4. INCOME ....................................................................................................................................... 35
4.5. EMPLOYMENT ............................................................................................................................. 36
4.6. INFRASTRUCTURE ....................................................................................................................... 37
4.7. LANDCOVER................................................................................................................................. 37
4.8. WATERSHEDS .............................................................................................................................. 38
4.9. SCHOOL DISTRICTS ...................................................................................................................... 38
4.10. FUTURE COMMUNITY TRENDS FOR 2040 ................................................................................ 39
SECTION 5: COMMUNITY CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT ....................................................................... 43
5.1. COMMUNITY PLANNING TOOL ASSESSMENT ........................................................................... 43
5.2. PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM .......................................... 49
5.3. NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM IN MINNESOTA ...................................................... 49
5.4. REPETITIVE LOSS PROPERTIES ..................................................................................................... 53
5.5. COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM (CRS) .......................................................................................... 54
SECTION 6: HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN MAINTENANCE ................................................................. 57
6.1. MONITORING, EVALUATING AND UPDATING PLAN .................................................................. 57
6.2. FIVE YEAR REVISION PROCEDURE .............................................................................................. 59
6.3. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ................................................................................................................ 59
6.4. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HMP THROUGH EXISTING PROGRAMS AND PLANS ..................... 60
SECTION 7: APPENDICES ................................................................................................................... 63
APPENDIX A: REGIONAL REVIEW WORKING GROUP MEETING MINUTES ................................... 63
APPENDIX B: SOCIAL MEDIA AND DIGITAL MEDIA PRESS RELEASE .............................................. 67
APPENDIX C: SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE ......................................................................................... 73
APPENDIX D: COMMUNITY MAP SERIES ........................................................................................ 93
1. BODIES OF WATER DAM LOCATIONS ............................................................................. 93
FLOOD HAZARD AREAS ................................................................... 94
PUBLIC WATER AND WATERCOURSE INVENTORY ......................... 95
WATERSHED DELINEATION PROJECT .............................................. 96
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORG AND WATERSHED DISTRICT ... 97
2. GEOGRAPHY LANDCOVER CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (MLCCS) ............................. 98
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL ........................................................... 99
KARST LANDFORM ........................................................................ 100
LANDSLIDES ................................................................................... 101
3. INCOME AND POVERTY INCOME BELOW FEDERAL POVERTY LEVEL .................................. 102
MEDIAN INCOME HOUSEHOLD ..................................................... 103
CHILD POPULATION UNDER 18 LIVING BELOW POVERTY LEVEL.. 104
4. POPULATION BLACK OR AFRICAN‐AMERICAN POPULATION .............................. 105
AMERICAN INDIAN AND ALASKA NATIVE POPULATION ................ 106
ASIAN POPULATION ........................................................................ 107
WHITE POPULATION ....................................................................... 108
NATIVE HAWAIIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER POPULATION ............ 109
HISPANIC OR LATINO POPULATION ................................................ 110
SOME OTHER RACE POPULATION .................................................. 111
TWO OR MORE RACE POPULATION ............................................... 112
LANGUAGE‐ (AGE +5) TWO OR MORE LANGUAGES AT HOME ..... 113
MN DEPT OF EDUCATION‐ SCHOOL DISTRICTS .............................. 114
APPENDIX E: GROWTH TREND SUMMARIES ............................................................................... 115
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
9
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION
Across the United States, natural and manmade disasters have led to increasing levels of death, injury,
property damage, and interruption of business and government services. The impact on families and
individuals can be immense and damages to businesses can result in regional economic consequences.
The time, money, and effort to respond to and recover from these disasters divert public resources and
attention from other important programs and problems.
Hennepin County is vulnerable to a variety of potential hazards. With seven Presidential Disaster
Declarations since 2010, Hennepin County recognizes the consequences of disasters and the need to
reduce the impacts of natural and manmade hazards. This HMP focuses primarily on natural hazard.
The elected and appointed officials of the County also know that with careful selection, mitigation actions
in the form of projects and programs can become long‐term, cost‐effective means for reducing the impact
of natural and manmade hazards.
The 2024 Hennepin County Multi‐Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP or the Plan) for Hennepin
County, Minnesota, was prepared with input from the Mitigation Planning Regional Review Committee,
the Hennepin County Emergency Management (HCEM) Planning cell, county residents, responsible
officials, other HCEM department members, the state hazard mitigation officer, and in accordance with
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
The process to develop the HMP included a year of coordination and collaboration with representatives
from all the jurisdictions in Hennepin County. The HMP will guide the County toward paying down risk,
greater disaster resistance in harmony with the character, and needs of the community.
This section of the HMP includes an overview of the Plan, a discussion of the Plan’s purpose and authority,
and a description of the 45 incorporated cities, the Minneapolis/St. Paul Airport, and the Fort Snelling
unincorporated portion of the County.
1.1.1. PLAN DESCRIPTION AND REQUIREMENTS
Federal legislation has historically provided funding for disaster relief, recovery, and some hazard
mitigation planning. The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) is the latest legislation to improve
this planning process (Public Law 106‐390). The new legislation reinforces the importance of mitigation
planning and emphasizes planning for disasters before they occur. As such, DMA 2000 establishes a pre‐
disaster hazard mitigation program and requirements for the national post‐disaster Hazard Mitigation
Grant Program (HMGP).
Section 322 of DMA 2000 specifically addresses mitigation planning at the state and local levels. It
identifies requirements that allow HMGP funds to be used for planning activities and increases the
amount of HMGP funds available to states that have developed a comprehensive, enhanced mitigation
plan prior to a disaster. States and communities must have an approved mitigation plan in place prior to
receiving post‐disaster HMGP funds. Local and tribal mitigation plans must demonstrate that their
proposed mitigation measures are based on a sound planning process that accounts for the risk to and
the capabilities of the individual communities. State governments have certain responsibilities for
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
10
implementing Section 322, including:
Preparing and submitting a standard or enhanced state mitigation plan.
Reviewing and updating the state mitigation plan every three years.
Providing technical assistance and training to local governments to assist them in applying for
HMGP grants and in developing local mitigation plans; and
Reviewing and approving local plans if the state is designated a managing state and has an
approved enhanced plan.
DMA 2000 is intended to facilitate cooperation between state and local authorities, prompting them to
work together. It encourages and rewards local and state pre‐disaster planning and promotes
sustainability as a strategy for disaster resistance. This enhanced planning network is intended to enable
local and state governments to articulate accurate needs for mitigation, resulting in faster allocation of
funding and more effective risk reduction projects.
FEMA prepared an Interim Final Rule (IFR), published in the Federal Register on February 26, 2002 (44 CFR
Parts 201 and 206), which establishes planning and funding criteria for states and local communities. The
Plan has been prepared to meet Homeland Security Emergency Management (HSEM) and FEMA
requirements thus making the County eligible for funding and technical assistance from state and federal
hazard mitigation programs.
FEMA also requires that this plan meet the Local Mitigation Planning Policy Guide FP 206‐21‐0002,
released April 19, 2022, and went into effect on April 19, 2023. This policy provides 8 planning elements
that address 51 standards/requirements that must be addressed for FEMA Hazard Mitigation Plan
approval.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
11
2.1. AUTHORITY C1
This updated HMP complies with all requirements set forth by HSEM and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, Section 104 of the Disaster Mitigation of 2000. In addition, it
complies with all of FEMA’s Final Rule 44 CFR 201.6 (c)(3), which outlines criteria for approval of mitigation
plans.
2.2. SCOPE
The HMP identifies 19 natural hazards that pose a threat to this county, including both incorporated and
unincorporated areas, and provides goals, objectives, and a plan of action for mitigating these hazards.
This plan addresses and addresses natural hazards affecting Hennepin County as determined by frequency
of event, economic impact, deaths, and injuries. The plan addresses hazard risk, reviews current state and
local hazard mitigation capabilities, develops mitigation strategies and identifies partner agency and other
interagency working group’s actions to address mitigation needs. The plan, as agreed upon by all
participating jurisdictions, assists in collaborating local mitigation plans or projects. Mitigation
recommendations are provided through various federal, state, and local agency discussion and research.
The HMP identifies a variety of existing literature and resources that will be used to assist participants in
this plan, to succeed in their mitigation project application efforts. This is accomplished by establishing
countywide mitigation strategies, providing technical resources through state, county and local agency
staff expertise and support, to include, providing financial assistance through various grant programs,
declarations, training and education and other jurisdiction initiatives for example partnering within
community capital improvement.
2.3. PURPOSE
FEMA defines Hazard Mitigation as any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long‐term risk to
people and property from natural hazards for example, but not all‐inclusive, flooding, storms, high winds,
wildfires, earthquakes, etc. Mitigation efforts undertaken by communities will help reduce or eliminate
damages to buildings and infrastructure, such as water supplies, sewers, and utility transmission lines, as
well as natural, cultural, and historic resources.
The objective of the HMP is to rationalize the process of determining appropriate mitigation actions in
protecting citizens, critical facilities, infrastructure, private property, and the surrounding environment
from natural hazards. This objective can be achieved by identifying potential hazards in the jurisdiction,
share information, discuss options, determine funding availability, and submit applications for qualified
projects that would mitigate the effects of those hazards identified. This plan provides a framework for
planning against all natural hazards in the county. The HMP can be used as a foundation beyond local
mitigation plans in identifying additional collaborative partnerships in the county who wish to participate
in paying down risk within their communities.
2.4. ADOPTION F1a, F2a
In 2010, the incorporated cities and Hennepin County formed an agreement which established the
unification in the development of writing this plan. The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and
City Councils from each participating municipality were required to adopt the plan prior to its submittal
to HSEM and FEMA for final adoption.
SECTION 2 PLAN PURPOSE, AUTHORITY AND ADOPTION
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
12
The Plan is intended to serve many purposes, including:
Enhance Public Awareness and Understanding – to help residents of the County better understand
the natural and manmade hazards that threaten public health, safety, and welfare; economic
vitality; and the operational capability of important institutions.
Create a Decision Tool for Leadership, supervisors, or management – to provide information that
key decision makers of local government, business and industry, community associations, and
other key institutions and organizations that need to take steps or actions by addressing
vulnerabilities in reducing loss of life, prevent injury, and critical infrastructure damage with
unforeseen future disasters.
Promote compliance with State and Federal Program Requirements‐ to ensure that Hennepin
County and its incorporated cities can take full advantage of state and federal grant programs,
policies, and regulations that encourage or mandate that local governments develop
comprehensive hazard mitigation plans.
Enhance Local Policies for Hazard Mitigation Capability‐ to provide the policy basis for mitigation
actions that should be promulgated by participating jurisdictions to create a more disaster
resistant future.
Provide Inter‐Jurisdictional Coordination of Mitigation‐Related Programming‐ to ensure that
proposals for mitigation initiatives are reviewed and coordinated among participating
jurisdictions within the county; and
Achieve Regulatory Compliance ‐ To qualify for certain forms of federal aid for pre and post
disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with the federal DMA 2000 and its implementing
regulations (44CFR Section 201.6). DMA 2000 intends for hazard mitigation plans to remain
relevant and current. Therefore, it requires that state hazard mitigation plans are updated every
three years and local plans, including Hennepin County’s every five years. This means that the
HMP for Hennepin County uses a “five‐year planning horizon”. It is designed to carry the County
through a five‐year term, after which its goals, objectives, and actions will be reviewed with
revisions being submitted to the County Board for adoption and approval.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
13
This section provides an overview of the planning process used to update the 2023 Hennepin County HMP.
It includes who was involved in preparing the plan, how the public and stakeholders were involved, and
the review and incorporation of existing plans and studies.
3.1. Why Prepare This Plan – The Big Picture
Hazard mitigation can be defined as, “to reduce or alleviate the loss of life, personal injury, and property
damage that can result from a disaster through both long and short‐term strategies”. It involves strategies
such as planning, policy changes, programs, projects, and other activities that can mitigate the impacts of
hazards. The responsibility for hazard mitigation lies with many, including private property owners;
business and industry; and local, state, and federal government.
Types of hazard mitigation measures include the following (not all‐inclusive):
• Structural hazard control or protection projects
• Retrofitting of facilities
• Acquisition and relocation of structures
• Development of mitigation standards, regulations, policies, and programs
• Public awareness and education programs
• Development or improvement of warning systems
The benefits of hazard mitigation include the following (not all‐inclusive):
• Saving lives, protecting the health of the public, and reducing injuries
• Preventing or reducing property damage
• Reducing economic losses
• Minimizing social dislocation and stress
• Reducing agricultural losses
• Maintaining critical facilities in functioning order
• Protecting infrastructure from damage
• Protecting mental health
• Reducing legal liability of government and public officials
The Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA) of 2000 (Public Law 106‐390) required state and local governments to
develop hazard mitigation plans as a condition for federal disaster grant assistance. Prior to 2000, Federal
disaster funding focused on disaster relief and recovery with limited funding for hazard mitigation
planning. The DMA increased the emphasis on planning for disasters before they occur.
The DMA encourages state and local authorities to work together on pre‐disaster planning, and it promote
sustainability for disaster resistance. “Sustainable hazard mitigation” includes the sound management of
natural resources and the recognition that hazards, and mitigation must be understood in the largest
possible social and economic context. The enhanced planning network called for by the DMA helps local
government’s articulate accurate needs for mitigation, resulting in faster allocation of funding and more
cost‐effective risk reduction projects.
SECTION 3 PLANNING PROCESS A
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
14
3.2.1. Hennepin County’s Response to the DMA
In 2005, Hennepin County Emergency Management (HCEM) and municipalities agreed to work together
to establish a framework for hazard mitigation planning that would meet the local mitigation planning
requirements of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR 44). The result was a HMP that included
Hennepin County Departments, municipalities, and special jurisdictions. The plan provided local
governments with the tools to complete individual mitigation objectives and actions, as well as completing
a vulnerability assessment to meet their needs, while pooling resources and eliminating redundant
planning activities.
3.2.2. Purpose for Planning
HCEM and its planning partners have a long‐standing history of collaboration, proactive planning, and
program implementation by developing and adopting a multi‐jurisdiction all hazard mitigation plan.
Strategies in this plan were selected because they meet element requirements, provide eligibility for
project funding, and because they meet the needs of the planning partners for their residents. This HMP
will identify strategies, goals, objectives, projects, costs, and safety information, to reduce risk from
natural hazards. This HMP will help guide and coordinate mitigation activities throughout Hennepin
County. The plan has been developed to meet the following objectives:
Meet or exceed requirements of the DMA.
Enable all HMP participating partners to apply for federal grant funding to reduce risk through
mitigation.
Meet the needs of each planning partner as well as state and federal requirements.
Create a risk assessment that focuses on Hennepin County’s nineteen (19) identified hazards.
Create a single planning document that integrates all planning partners into a framework that
supports partnerships within the County and puts all partners on the same planning cycle for
future updates.
Create opportunity for local governments in the County not included in the previous plan to gain
DMA compliance.
Meet the planning requirements of FEMA’s Community Rating System (CRS), allowing planning
partners that participate in the CRS program to maintain or enhance their CRS classifications.
Coordinate existing plans and programs so that high‐priority initiatives and projects to mitigate
possible disaster impacts have an opportunity to funded and implemented.
3.2.3. Who Will Benefit from this Plan?
All communities, businesses, and residents of Hennepin County are the ultimate beneficiaries of this HMP.
The plan reduces risk for those who live in, work in, and visit Hennepin County. It provides a viable
planning framework for all natural hazards that may impact the County. Participation in development of
the plan by key stakeholders in the County help reduce risk and ensure that outcomes will be mutually
beneficial. The resources and background information in the plan are applicable countywide, and the
plan’s goals and recommendations can lay the groundwork for the development and implementation of
local mitigation projects, open discussions or share information across multiple jurisdictions wanting to
participate in the same mitigation project and develop or build relationships.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
15
3.2.4. Plan Update – The Planning Process A1A A1B
Hennepin County Emergency Management assumes the position of lead agency in preparing the HMP for
the county and participating jurisdictions. The HMP revision process took one year and six months to
complete, beginning in August 2022 with plan adoption in February 2024. Forty‐two municipalities, three
cities that share boundaries with adjacent counties, Fort Snelling, and MSP Airport were considered in this
plan. County Departments are also covered under the 2023 Hennepin County HMP. The planning process
used to develop this Plan is as follows:
A. A Regional Review Working Group (RRWG) was created to assess the plan. The RRWG consisted
of one Hennepin County Emergency Management staff member and the regional chair of each of
the four planning groups. The RRWG reviewed this plan mitigation goals and objectives,
determined that using the existing 2018 plan was reasonable to follow the framework for revision,
reviewed various county plans, and used the Local Mitigation Planning Policy Guide, FP 206‐21‐
0002, Released April 19, 2022, Effective April 19, 2023, OMB Collection #1660‐0062.
B. The RRWG met five times throughout 2022‐2023. (See TABLE 3.16A for schedule)
C. The plan established and carried over many of the FEMA elements from 2018 but placed an
emphasis primarily on those FEMA elements that were added in 2022 to include, critical
infrastructure, underserved populations, and climate change.
D. Hennepin County continued with the Hazard Mitigation Plan “Combination Model” for their
planning and review process. Using this model, Hennepin County’s four Area Planning Groups:
Minneapolis Group (5), Lake Minnetonka Regional Planning Group (21), North Suburban Regional
Planning Group (14) and South Planning Group (7) appointed one representative to serve on the
Hennepin County Mitigation Planning and Review Team to act on behalf of their regional group.
This model assisted several smaller municipalities that had limited resources to participate in the
overall early planning stages but were able to meet regionally or specifically with HCEM to work
through their supporting documentation for local plan adoption. (See section 3.13)
E. Public Participation was established using a community survey using a similar template from 2018
but made changes to meet the FEMA elemental requirements as recommended in 2022. The
survey was created by HCEM and disseminated through the county social media sites and several
city websites. See Section 7: appendix C)
TABLE 3.5A below is a summary of the 2024 HMP Update Process:
Task Date Action
Task 1:
Notification and FEMA
guidelines review
August 2022 State notification was received in preparation to
resubmit the next 5‐year plan. A review of the 2018
Hennepin County HMP was conducted by HCEM. It
was determined that the plan needed some revision
so that it was consistent with the new 2022 FEMA
Local Mitigation Planning Policy Guide. All meetings
were documented and included in this revision (see
TABLE 3.16A)
Task 2:
Building working groups
and planning teams
August 2022‐
June 2023
A Regional Review Working Group and Mitigation
Planning Teams were formed to reflect county, local
jurisdiction, and partner organization interests. Only
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
16
Task Date Action
one member of the former 2018 steering committee
was involved in this update. Each participating
jurisdiction had at least one representative as a
member of a planning team
Task 3:
Create an Outreach
Strategy
May 2023‐
November 2023
The county engaged the public and its participating
jurisdictions through surveys, regional, and quarterly
meetings. Stakeholder meetings were also conducted
by meeting independently with all 42 cities. Public and
stakeholder involvement is described below.
Task 4:
Review Community
Capabilities
May 2023‐
January 2024
Capabilities were assessed by each jurisdiction’s
emergency manager with additional support from
HCEM, from open‐source information, local agency
updates and resource list compiling
Task 5:
Risk Assessment
2010‐2024 The current overall hazard risk assessment was
reviewed. All 7 federal declarations with natural
hazard implication in Hennepin County since 2010,
were considered. Each participant also reviewed risk
against their priority 1‐ critical infrastructure.
Hennepin County’s Regional Emergency Management
Reference Collection was also available as a reference
to assess risk.
Task 6:
Mitigation Strategies
May 2023‐
November 2023
Ten goals were used to make decisions for paying
down risk. Participants built strategies by assessing
gaps and vulnerabilities within their jurisdictional
boundaries against those goals. Each participating
jurisdiction reviewed past projects that were
completed or yet to be completed and were carried
over to this HMP. Participants also submitted new
mitigation projects for future projects.
Task 7:
Plan Maintenance
Procedure
2024‐2029 Covid‐19 limited a normal review cycle during this
revision period. The 2018 base plan, nineteen natural
hazards, and all community qualifying documentation
products were reviewed, updated, crossed over, or
deleted for this 2024 plan. A cyclic review schedule will
occur routinely with a local mitigation strategies (LMS)
group.
Task 8:
Review and Adopt the
Plan
January 2024 A draft of the plan was reviewed by HCEM,
participating jurisdictions of the plan, Hennepin
County Board of Commissioners, the HSEM state
hazard mitigation officer, and the Regional Review
Working Group. The adopted plan (with some
redaction) will be made available to the public via the
county website and for participating agencies who
wish to upload a redacted version to their city
websites. The plan will be sent to HSEM/FEMA for
approval February 2024. Each participating
jurisdiction will also adopt this plan through resolution
in QTR 1 2024
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
17
Task Date Action
Task 9:
Final Plan Delivery
February 2024 Hennepin County Emergency Management will upload
a redacted and unredacted version for State, County,
local jurisdictions, and partner organization receipt.
3.2.5. Plan Organizational Changes E1
TABLE 3.6A below highlights key changes. Organizational changes were minimal to this HMP document.
2018 Plan 2024 Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
Section 1: Introduction
Section 2: Plan Purpose, Authority and Adoption
Section 3: Planning Process
Section 4: County Profile
Section 5: Community Capability Assessment
Section 6: Hazard Mitigation Plan Maintenance
Section 7: Appendices
All 7 sections remain as in 2018.
Removed outdated information
where appropriate. Removed
redundant information and
rearranged subsections for
easier transitions. Updated
where appropriate
Volume 2‐ Hazard Inventory
Section 1: Hazard Categories and Inclusions
Section 2: Disaster Declaration History and Recent Trends
Section 3: Climate Adaptation Considerations
Section 4: Comprehensive Natural Hazard Assessment Profiles
Section 5: Vulnerability Assessment
Section 6: Cultural Resource Inventory
Section 7: Critical Infrastructure Key Resources (CIKR)
The 2018 plan had 10 sections.
Sections 5, 6, and 7 were
removed due to their focus on
human caused incidents. The
CIKR inventory was expanded to
include more facilities and assess
hazard vulnerability
Volume 3‐ Community and Mitigation Strategies
Section 1: Mitigation Strategy, Goals and Objectives
Section 2: Mitigation Action Plan
Section 3: Mitigation Actions and Projects
Section 4: Minnesota Mitigation Crosswalk
Section 5: Acronyms and Abbreviations
Section 6: Glossary
Section 7: Appendices
Section 3 was revised to further
detail the progress of projects
from 2018 and reformatted to
condense its size. The
appendices also received
updates to the regulatory
crosswalk and jurisdiction
participation sheet.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
18
3.2.6. Why Update
44 CFR stipulates that hazard mitigation plans must present a schedule for monitoring, evaluating, and
updating project status of the plan. Updates provide an opportunity to reevaluate goals and objectives
and assess if impacts of those determined actions are currently being or have been accomplished. If the
intent is not being met the mitigation strategy may need to be reviewed or modified. Should this plan
reach its expiration date, participants will not be able to pursue elements of federal funding under the
Robert T. Stafford Act for which this adopted hazard mitigation plan is a prerequisite.
3.2.7. The Updated Plan – What is Different E2a
There are only a few changes to this 2024 plan which includes a change in the overall number of
participating agencies involved in the plan update process. So, while this plan is an update for several
participants, it is also the initial plan for new emergency managers who have been hired, selected, or
appointed since 2018. Therefore, it was important to establish a planning process that was consistent for
returning or new participants. The updated plan differs from the 2018 plan as described below:
The current risk assessment (VOL 1) continues to reflect the nineteen natural hazards identified
in this HMP. The updates cover the period between 2018‐2023 and will providing new information
regarding significant events within this new 5‐year timeline.
The update (VOL 3) creates an opportunity for the County and participants to review the plan in
whole and engage citizens directly through community outreach involvement, social media, and
surveys in a coordinated approach to gage their perception of risk and support of the concept of
risk reduction through mitigation.
The plan (VOL 3) identifies new mitigation strategies, goals, ideas, or recommendations for all
participants to review and consider.
The critical infrastructure risk assessment (VOL 3) was prepared to be informative to local
emergency managers and what facilities were critical in continuity and their daily operations.
Identifying infrastructure with risk assessment should better support future grant applications by
providing risk and vulnerability information that will directly support the measurement of “cost‐
effectiveness” required under FEMA mitigation grant programs.
An additional capability accountability tool (VOL 1) was created to identify ordinance and
regulation.
The dashboards (VOL 3) were modified to reflect references, social media, city websites, and any
updates as described by the jurisdiction’s emergency manager.
Given the extent of changes in this update, readers should consider this to be a simple revised or modified
plan. Previous or prior plan versions are used as references in identifying where relevant change and
correlations are required through discussion and cyclic review. Federal or state data or information
becomes relevant where new content is required to add to the next iteration in hazard mitigation
planning.
3.3. Summary of Previous Planning Efforts
HCEM developed its first HMP in 2005, which was led by then named Hennepin County Emergency
Preparedness. A Local Mitigation Planning Team was created and served as the planning team. The plan
included three generalized goals:
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
19
Protect life and Property.
Execute activities that assist in protecting lives by making homes, businesses, infrastructure,
critical facilities, and other property more resistant to losses from hazards.
Improve hazard assessment information to make recommendations for new and for existing
developments in areas vulnerable to hazards.
Public Awareness
Increase public awareness of the risks associated with hazards in the county.
Provide information on tools, partnerships, opportunities, and funding resources to assist in
implementing mitigation activities.
Partnerships and Implementation
Strengthen communication and coordinate participation among and within public agencies,
citizens, nonprofit organizations, business, and industry to gain a vested interest in
implementation.
Encourage leadership within public and private sector organizations to prioritize and implement
local, county, and regional hazard mitigation activities.
In 2010, HCEM re‐wrote the plan for the update due to several changes in the County’s risk assessment
as well as new technology (HAZUS‐MH) to estimate losses to critical infrastructure. A Steering Committee
was made up of HCEM personnel as well as the City of Minneapolis’s then Emergency Preparedness
Department.
In 2015, the HMP expired. Between 2015‐2018, HCEM took an additional 26 months to do a complete
review and overhaul to meet the FEMA elemental requirements. The steering committee provided seven
goals and each participating community was deeply involved in the planning process. The final adoption
of the plan took place in 2018.
The 2018 HMP expired in August 2023.
3.10 Organization of the Plan
The 2024 update to the HMP has undergone small changes from the 2018 version. Updates were made
using FEMA policy guidance, mitigation planning teams, federal hazard mitigation strategies, and
Hennepin County Emergency Management Director directive. The plan was organized to reflect current
practice and recommended guidance. However, content from the previous versions will continue to be
included. The HMP consists of and maintains three components, each are broken down in the following
volumes:
Volume 1: Background and County Profile (103 pages)
Section 1: Introduction
Section 2: Plan Purpose, Authority and Adoption
Section 3: Planning Process
Section 4: County Profile
Section 5: Community Capability Assessment
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
20
Section 6: Hazard Mitigation Plan Maintenance
Section 7: Appendices
Volume 2: Hazard Inventory (359 pages)
Section 1: Hazard Categories and Inclusions
Section 2: Disaster Declaration History and Recent Trends
Section 3: Climate Adaptation Considerations
Section 4: Comprehensive Natural Hazard Assessment Profiles
Section 5: Vulnerability Assessment
Section 6: Cultural Resource Inventory
Section 7: Critical Infrastructure Key Resources (CIKR)
Volume 3: Community and Mitigation Strategies (291 Pages)
Section 1: Mitigation Strategy, Goals and Objectives
Section 2: Mitigation Action Plan
Section 3: Mitigation Actions and Projects
Section 4: Minnesota Mitigation Crosswalk
Section 5: Acronyms and Abbreviations
Section 6: Glossary
Section 7: Appendices
3.11 Planning Objectives
To develop the Hennepin County HMP update, the County followed a process that had the following
primary objectives:
Establish a Regional Review Working Group.
Form a mitigation planning teams by jurisdiction.
Coordinate planning sessions with each participating jurisdiction (42).
Reviewing existing goals, objectives, actions, and past projects.
Develop a hazard risk assessment addressing critical infrastructure and the nineteen natural
hazards.
Engage the Public through social media with an opportunity to participate in a survey.
Add ordinance and regulations capability assessment.
3.12 Establish a Regional Review Working Group
Hazard mitigation planning invites collaboration and support among participating jurisdictions whose
communities can be affected by hazard losses. Participating jurisdictions can create partnerships that pool
resources to achieve a common vision for the community. A Regional Review Working Group was formed
to provide review, observations, and recommendations for plan updates. The members of this committee
included the four chairs of the regional planning groups and a staff member from Hennepin County
Emergency Management. Several meetings took place in 2022‐ 2023. Regional Review Working Group
meeting minutes are provided in Section 7: Appendix A (page 59‐62)
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
21
3.13 Forming a Mitigation Planning Team A2a
To assist with the development and implantation of this HMP update, the Regional Review Working Group
agreed that the Mitigation Planning Team (MPT) would consist of at least one lead representative from
each jurisdiction. HCEM’s Plans & Systems Integration Coordinator assumed the role as lead administrator
for review and training, scheduling a 2‐hour block of instruction for each jurisdiction. Each jurisdiction
could have as many representatives attend their mitigation document development training session.
Additional meetings were available should a jurisdiction need additional support. A PowerPoint tutorial
was created, and a SharePoint password was created to give and allow jurisdictions additional support to
review guidance and document updates, if needed. The MPT leads are listed for each jurisdiction and their
primary affiliation:
Lakes Region
Corcoran Matt Gottschalk Police
Deephaven Cory Johnson Police
Excelsior Brian Tholen Police
Greenfield Margaret Webb City Admin
Greenwood Brian Tholen Police
Independence Gary Kroells Police
Long Lake Marc Schultz Police
Loretto Jason Nelson Police
Maple Plain Gary Kroells Police
Medina Jason Nelson Police
Minnetonka Beach Corey Farniok Police
Minnetrista Paul Falls Police
Mound Greg Pederson Fire
Orono Corey Farniok Police
Rockford and Hanover Wright County
St. Bonifacious Paul Falls Police
Shorewood Brian Tholen Police
Spring Park Corey Farniok Police
Tonka Bay Brian Tholen Police
Wayzata Marc Schultz Police
Woodland Cory Johnson Police
North Region
Brooklyn Center Todd Berg Fire
Brooklyn Park Shawn Conway Fire
Champlain Glen Schneider Police
Crystal Mark Ray Public Works
Dayton Paul Enga Police
Golden Valley Fire
Maple Grove Tim Bush Fire
Medicine lake Joshua Hauble Emergency Management
New Hope Sarah Larson Fire
Osseo Shane Mikkelson Police
Plymouth Erik Fadden Police
Robbinsdale Patrick Foley Police
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
22
Rogers Patrick Farrens Fire
St. Anthony Zach Lundberg Public Works
South Region
Bloomington Ulyssess Seal Fire
Chanhassen Carver County
Eden Prairie Scott Gerber Fire
Edina Andrew Slama Fire
Hopkins Dale Specken Fire
Minnetonka Aaron Morris Fire
Richfield Jay Henthorne Fire
St. Louis Park Steve Koering Fire
East Region
Minneapolis Eric Gustafson Emergency Manager
3.14 Coordinate with other Agencies A2a
44CFR requires that opportunities for involvement in the planning process be provided to neighboring
communities, local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation, agencies with authority to
regulate development, business, academia, agencies that represent socially vulnerable communities, and
other private and non‐profit interests. The Mitigation Planning Team Representatives invited additional
agencies that fall under those classifications from within their jurisdictions, as well as watershed and
school districts. This effort resulted in the steering committee described below:
All 43 municipalities in Hennepin County (EM’s, PW, School districts, Watersheds)
Hennepin County Departments (GIS and Public Health)
Xcel Energy
University of Minnesota
3.15 Review of Existing Programs
44 CFR states that hazard mitigation planning must include review and incorporation, if appropriate, of
existing plans, studies, reports, and technical information. In addition, the following programs can affect
mitigation within the planning area:
Hennepin County Emergency Operations Plan
Emergency Operations Plans (Regional North, Regional Lakes, Independent South, and the City of
Minneapolis)
2019 Minnesota State Hazard Mitigation Plan
2019 Anoka County Mitigation Plan
2019 Carver County Mitigation Plan
2022 Dakota County Mitigation Plan
2019 Ramsey County Mitigation Plan
2021 Scott County Mitigation Plan
2023 Washington County Mitigation Plan
2023 Wright‐County Mitigation Plan
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
23
One of the Review Committee’s actions was to review the 2019 Minnesota State Hazard Mitigation Plan
(SHMP). The Review Committee identified hazards listed in the state plan (pg. 56) to which the Hennepin
County planning area is susceptible and to determine if there was a need to expand the scope of the
current Natural Hazard Risk Assessment. The SHMP includes 15/22 natural hazards which are currently
identified in this HMP, the other seven being industrial or manmade hazards, which are not included in
this plan. The Committee also reviewed the 2022 FEMA Local Mitigation Planning Policy Guide
determining that three additional goals were required to meet the new guidance.
3.16 Plan Development Chronology/Milestones A1a
TABLE 3.16A summarizes important milestones in the development of the plan update.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
24
Plan Development Calendar of Events
Date Event Milestone Attendance
2022
10/10/2022
10/26/2022
10/27/2022
HCEM Mtgs for
community outreach
Survey Questionnaire discussion, timeline, and
buildout
2‐5
11/10/2022 Regional Review
Working Group Mtg 1
Info sharing, establishing HMP timeline 7
11/16/2022 FEMA webinar
Steven Green
Hazard Mitigation planning guidance 5
12/01/2022 Community Outreach
Survey
Survey questionnaire launched 43
12/05/2022 Community Outreach
Survey
HMP email: QRC created and disseminated to
provide survey link
42
12/07/2022 Community Outreach
Survey
HMP email: Provide update and additional
survey information
42
2023
1/18/2023 Community Outreach
Survey
City Websites
advertise survey opportunity and announce
HMP revision
UNK
1/30/2023 HCEM Staff Mtg Check on progress discussion, accept
recommendations
2
2/22/2023 Community Outreach
HEMC Quarterly mtg
HMP progress, documents, and timeline update 82
4/20/2023 Regional Review
Working Group Mtg 2
Plan completion timeline, 44 CFR element
review, Natural Hazard review
5
5/18/2023 Regional Review
Working Group Mtg 3
Progress updates, community planning visits,
product checklist, timeline update
5
5/18/2023 Community Outreach
HEMC Quarterly mtg
HMP progress report 65
5/25/23 Community Outreach Lakes Group HMP information update 15
5/26/2023‐
12/15/2023
Participating
jurisdiction planning
1 on 1 city visits commence to plan HM. Two‐
hour blocks are scheduled with each jurisdiction
75
6/22/2023 Regional Review
Working Group Mtg 4
Progress updates, community visit completions,
product checklist, timeline update
5
7/13/2023 Community Outreach South Group HMP information update 20
8/03/2023 Community Outreach North Group HMP information update 15
8/16/2023 Community Outreach
HEMC Quarterly mtg
HMP progress report 65
8/24/2023 Regional Review
Working Group Mtg 5
Progress updates, community visit completions,
product checklist, timeline update
5
9/07/23 Community Outreach North Group HMP information update 15
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
25
Plan Development Calendar of Events
Date Event Milestone Attendance
10/05/23 Community Outreach North Group HMP information update 15
10/12/23 Community Outreach South Group HMP information update 20
11/15/23 Community Outreach
HEMC Quarterly mtg
HMP progress report 45
2024
1/16/24 County Review Board Action Request submitted 4
1/19/24 State Review FEMA elements review 1
1/23/24 County Adoption Hennepin County Board approves HMP 10
2/01/24 City Resolutions Cities begin adopting plan 42
3.17 Develop a New Risk Assessment
HCEM continued to use the same methodology of historic hazard data collection as it did in the 2018 plan.
State, Federal, and local information sources were used to identify any new data that has occurred over
the past five‐year period. In addition, HCEM continues to use the Hennepin County Regional Emergency
Management Reference Library and web‐based historical open‐source collection as a primary means in
data gathering.
3.18 HCEM Regional Emergency Management Planning Reference Collection A4
The purpose of Hennepin County Emergency Managements Regional Emergency Management Planning
Reference Collection (REMPRC) is intended to assist emergency managers and others involved in
emergency mitigation, preparation, response, and recovery. The collection is oriented toward historical
disasters, after actions, theory, emergency management strategic, operational, and tactical planning;
training and exercise design; as well as education, professional development and the evolution of
emergency management systems and processes. The reference material collected in the REMPRC was
created in 2010 and is categorized into very specific subject matter areas as it relates to disaster.
The priority is given to references related to the doctrine, organization, and professional practice of
emergency management, including theory, assessments, strategies, plans, and after‐action reviews. Also
collected are analysis and accounts of hazards or threats of a level that could require emergency
management employment (natural, technological, and adversarial).
The second priority is to gather references that are useful for understanding the present and future
environment that may have applications for strategic assessment and planning (demographics, economic
forecasts, technology assessments, etc.).
Last, the REMPRC gathers materials related to emergency practices within the disciplines that make up
the emergency management community (police, fire, emergency medical services, public works, public
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
26
health, etc.). Works dealing with technologies used in emergency management is assembled
(communications, data management, logistics, etc.).
The types of material collected is as follows, much of which was used to assist in the overall Risk
Assessment section of this plan.
A4a
Government documents, including formal doctrine, frameworks and other broad federal and
state level strategy and references. Also includes tactical references such as incident
management handbooks and other National Incident Management System (NIMS) and
Incident Command System (ICS) planning tools.
Mitigation plans, including state, county, and municipal plans to mitigate the impacts of
hazards.
Emergency operations plans, including standing contingency plans for operations during an
emergency at all levels of government as well as non‐government and private entities.
Incident action plans, including specific operational period plans utilized at incident sites for
upcoming operational periods. Also includes incident support plans developed at an
Emergency Operations Centers that focus on upcoming operational phases.
Continuity of operations plans, includes reference material related to government, industry,
or organizational plans to continue.
After action reviews, including hot‐wash notes, interviews, and other materials related to the
lessons learned from emergency management responses, training, exercises, and allied
activity. Such reports include, but are not limited to National Fire Academy reports, National
Transportation Safety Board reports, Congressional commissions, and inquiries.
Training and exercise materials, including materials related to capability assessment, training
strategy, training and exercise development, scenario development and the conduct and
evaluation of training and exercises.
Technical documents, including but not restricted to census and demographic data, soil
surveys, geological survey reports, USGS water supply papers, climate data, NOAA
assessments and related materials. Also includes materials related to technical specialties
and their employment in emergencies including Geographic Information Systems (GIS),
Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT), radio communications, information systems, and social
media/public affairs.
Legal reference material, including references for the main tenants of emergency planning
and management at the federal, state, and local levels, such as Public Laws, US Codes,
Minnesota Statutes and County Board Resolutions.
Maps and atlases, includes depictions of natural data in space and through time such as
geology, soils, hydrology, topography, vegetation, and climate. Specific geological threats
such as seismicity maps, flood plains, karst, and slope failure are also collected. The collection
also includes human and cultural depictions such as population density, land use,
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
27
transportation, population density, critical infrastructure, income distribution, age
demographics, key emergency facilities, and related information.
Textbooks, including works on comparative emergency management, crisis leadership,
emergency management organization, planning processes and tools, and specialized
emergency planning as it relates to hospitals, public health, public works, libraries, utilities,
schools, corporations, special events and other sectors. Also includes references on scientific
data that is crucial for emergency management such as meteorology, hazardous materials,
radiation, chemistry, microbiology, and other fields.
Books, includes non‐fiction case studies on specific disasters, emergencies, and critical
situations. Also includes projections and forecasts of the future natural, social, economic, and
security environment.
Historical materials, includes resources that describe historic emergencies, disasters and
crisis and their underlying threats and hazards. Also traces the evolution of emergency
planning, organization, response, and recovery.
Photographs and imagery, includes still and moving photography and images on various
formats including film and digital media involving all aspects of emergency management.
Audio includes recordings of public warning messages, news reports, and radio transmissions
involving disasters and emergency response.
White Papers includes academic literature or articles pertaining to professional development,
current practices, new theory, or forecasting trends in emergency management. Many times,
this literature is available through search engines on the web (i.e., google scholar)
3.19 Public Involvement/ Engage the Public A3
Broad public participation in the planning process helps ensure that diverse points of view about the
planning area’s needs are considered and addressed. 44CFR requires that the public have opportunities
to comment on disaster mitigation and during the drafting stages and prior to plan approval.
3.20 Strategies to inform the public.
Since this planning process involved an update for some planning partners and first‐time planning for
others, HCEM continued to use a comprehensive outreach approach, using multiple media sources
already established in participating jurisdictions and the County. The strategy for involving the public in
this plan update emphasized the following elements:
Use of social media (Facebook, X‐Twitter, Instagram, Nextdoor, and city websites) to provide
information and seek input on the plan.
Use a questionnaire to determine and identify the public’s perception of risk.
Attempt to reach as many planning area residents using multiple media sources.
Partner with Hennepin County’s Communication Division for a consistent message regarding the
update to the HMP.
Identify and involve planning area stakeholders to take part in wide dissemination.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
28
The following graphic (GRAPHIC 3.20) is the initial invitation that was provided to all jurisdictions after
doing a one‐week beta test with three communities.
GRAPHIC 3.20
HCEM Hazard Mitigation Community Survey
Who: Hennepin County Residents
What: All Hazard Multi‐Jurisdictional Community Survey
When: Launched December 1st, 2022, scheduled to end January 31st, 2023, May be extended
Why: To provide a whole community option in mitigation participation through community websites and social media outlets
Currently Launched: Links posted to HCEM Social Media (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Nextdoor) and on the HCEM website
Responses as of Today: 64
Total Questions and Average Completion Time: 47 questions, about 23 minutes on average to complete
Top three cities with the most participants: Crystal (15), Minneapolis (12), St. Louis Park (8)
IMPORTANT: Our goal is to reach as many residents as possible in Hennepin County. To that end, we are asking cities and
regional partners to push this survey out to the community. This can be done by posting the survey information to:
1. Your city webpage
2. Your EM Web pages
3. Your social media sites
4. Local Newspapers
5. Partners in areas of law enforcement, fire, EMS, public works, schools, parks and recreation, transportation,
equity, and any other partners you can cast a net over
6. Attaching to utility bills
We want to get the word out about this survey as much as we can! If you are interested in helping us accomplish this, contact
Bruce Kelii (bruce.kelii@hennepin.us) for information, including templates for posting on websites and social media, a hard
copy of the survey, and a link and QR code for the survey to distribute.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
29
3.21 Social Media and Digital Media Press Release
Social media was used to engage the public for input and feedback on the 2024 HMP. With Hennepin
County and our communities’ ability to pass this information through their city websites, both Facebook
and X (Twitter) were used to direct residents of Hennepin County to take part in this update by completing
the survey questionnaire described below. It was determined to provide a link and QR code options to
participate. We asked residents about their experiences about past disasters and their perception of
hazard risks to Hennepin County. Residents were able to respond through an open survey period
beginning December 1, 2022, and closed on March 31, 2023. To keep the messages consistent, the
following social media messages were provided to all participating jurisdictions of this plan to provide
wide dissemination during the open period.
Digital media was the primary mechanism for the HMP release of information. A variety of press releases
were provided through county and local community websites. The information provided included that an
update was being conducted, that a survey was available, and links to the 2018 plan for review. For
example, The University of Minnesota produced a mass e‐mail to their staff and student body describing
what a HMP is, and asked students and staff to consider to participation. There were a variety of cities
who also placed this information on their city websites. See Section 7: Annex B (pages 63‐68)
Twitter / social media:
As we prepare for the five‐year update cycle of the All‐Hazard Mitigation Plan, we want to give
you, the public, the opportunity to be a part of the planning process! Follow the link below to
provide your input! (Link) (Add QR code image)
Facebook:
It’s time for mitigation planning! Hennepin County Emergency Management is preparing for the
five‐year update of the All‐Hazards Mitigation Plan, and we want your input! Hazard Mitigation is
a whole community process, and community involvement is an important part of that. We created
this survey, so you and the community can participate in the planning process.
If you live and/or work in Hennepin County, follow the link below to take the survey. We are
interested in your thoughts and what you have to say, so we sincerely appreciate you taking the
time to do this. Please share this survey with your friends and family too. The more responses we
get, the better! (Link)
What is Hazard Mitigation?
Hazard mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long‐term risk to people
and property from natural hazards such as flooding, storms, high winds, wildfires, earthquakes,
etc. (Provide QR Code) (Multiple languages if possible)
Website Post:
Hennepin County is updating the All‐Hazard Mitigation Plan, as required by the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. Local jurisdictions are required to update
the plan every five years to remain eligible for pre‐disaster and post‐disaster mitigation grant
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
30
programs.
Community involvement and feedback are vital to the success of the plan. The information you
provide by completing the survey below will help us better understand your hazard concerns and
can lead to mitigation activities to help lessen the impact of future hazard events. (Link, QR
Code, embed)
The following graphic (GRAPHIC 3.21) was used by Hennepin County and its participating jurisdictions as
part of the press release campaign during the open survey period.
GRAPHIC 3.21
Provide feedback on Hennepin County’s All‐Hazard Mitigation Plan
Hennepin County Emergency Management is updating the All‐Hazard Mitigation Plan, as required by the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. Local jurisdictions are required to update the plan every five years to remain
eligible for pre‐disaster and post‐disaster mitigation grant programs.
Community involvement and feedback are vital to the success of the plan. The information you provide by completing the
survey below will help us better understand your hazard concerns and can lead to mitigation activities that can help lessen the
impact of future hazard events.
Click here to take the survey
What is Hazard Mitigation?
Hazard Mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long‐term risk to people and property from natural
hazards, such as flooding, storms, high winds, wildfires, etc. Some examples include:
‐ Retrofitting water supply systems
‐ Stabilizing erosion hazard areas
‐ Elevating or retrofitting structures and utilities
‐ Building public safe rooms
Mitigation efforts undertaken by communities help to minimize damage to buildings and infrastructure, as well as natural,
cultural, and historic resources.
Why Plan?
Hazard Mitigation planning helps emergency management planners to identify the types of hazards that could affect Hennepin
County. Hazard Mitigation planning also helps emergency managers and communities to identify actions that can help to
reduce losses from those hazards. Ultimately, hazard mitigation planning helps to protect the residents of Hennepin County.
Planning also helps to identify vulnerabilities and develop strategies to reduce the potential impacts of hazards. Building
partnerships and reducing duplication of effort among organizations with similar goals is also a benefit of mitigation planning.
In the end, Hazard Mitigation planning helps to build communities that are more resilient to disaster and increases public
awareness of local hazards and disaster preparedness.
For more about Hennepin County Emergency Management or to view a public copy of the 2018 All‐Hazards Mitigation Plan,
click the link below:
Emergency Management | Hennepin County
More information about hazard mitigation:
Minnesota Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Federal Emergency Management Agency
The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000
44 CFR 201
42 U.S.C. 5165 (Stafford Act, Section 322)
42 U.S.C. 4104c (National Flood Insurance Act, Section 1366)
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
31
3.22 Survey Questionnaire A3a
This HMP survey questionnaire was developed by the staff at HCEM to mimic the 2018 whole community
approach. It also considered the 2022 FEMA guidance in creating questions to meet that criterion. The
questionnaire was used to gauge household preparedness for natural hazards and the level of knowledge
that residents have of hazards affecting Hennepin County. This questionnaire was hosted on several
Hennepin County municipal social media and websites as well as posted to the Hennepin County
Emergency Management Facebook and Twitter pages. The QR code and Link was also presented at
monthly regional meetings and quarterly meetings as a reminder to point out the survey was “live”.
Mitigation Planning Team members distributed the survey within their communities, with their local
partners, and with their local vulnerable populations. A summary of the questionnaire results can be
found below (3.24) under Public Involvement Results. The full questionnaire and results can be found in
Section 7: Appendix C (page 69‐88)
3.23 Public involvement results
From the questionnaire and feedback on social media posts, we found that the public is not aware that
the county has a hazard mitigation plan but are aware of several natural hazards that affect them and the
communities in Hennepin County. Major topics include Climate change, severe weather, and hail.
3.24 Stakeholder and Public Involvement Plan
HCEM is committed to engaging stakeholders and the public in mitigation planning activities. To
accomplish this, a Stakeholder and Public Involvement Plan was developed in 2015 which describes the
approach, activities to engage stakeholders and the public in the development of the HMP.
Based on current Federal requirements, a Mitigation Plan must include adequate and reasonable notice
and opportunity for comment and other input from a variety of stakeholders, including the public, local
governments, and other interested parties. HCEM has sought comment and the involvement of these
stakeholders and the public through planning forums and questionnaires, interviews, as well as an online
survey.
Outreach activities were conducted as part of the 2024 HMP. These activities sought input and comments
on the overall vision and direction for Hennepin County Emergency Management to meet the federal and
state requirements, as well as consider local level development and participation in planning.
This HMP determines both short and long‐range mitigation needs in community improvement and
integrates within the scope of long‐range planning with HSEM‐ State of Minnesota.
3.25 Goals for Stakeholder and Public Involvement:
The goals for stakeholder and public involvement for this HMP:
• Gain an understanding of the need, the potential impacts of and opportunities for this HMP to
improve the overall efficiency and sustainability of our communities
• Solicit input relative to mitigation policies, projects, and programs to better meet the needs of
communities while also making Hennepin County a more attractive location to conduct business
and a better place to live; and
• Provide input for developing a strategy for making investment decisions to mitigate risk.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
32
3.26 Outreach Activities and Participation
A. Open Houses/Regional Meetings/Quarterly Meetings
HCEM held five plan review teams meetings. At each, a short presentation was given
providing community visits, completion timelines, and survey results. Following each
presentation was a discussion period and a brief question and answer period.
HCEM attended all monthly regional planning group meetings (North, South, Lakes, and
Minneapolis) to provide updates, instruction and receive feedback from these groups.
HCEM would also meet with individual communities throughout this process.
B. Survey Questionnaire
The public through each of the 42 municipalities were given the opportunity to complete the
HMP survey. Invitations were sent by email, social media, presented in county and local
meetings, and available through local and the HCEM websites. Multiple reminders were sent
to local emergency managers to promote wide dissemination. The survey was posted through
survey monkey. The survey not only had questions about overall needs improve, but also
questions about specific demographic information. Local jurisdictions ensured that this survey
was available to underserved and socially vulnerable populations within their geographic
area.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
33
SECTION 4 COUNTY PROFILE
4.1. Hennepin County General Information
Location:
Hennepin County is in east‐central Minnesota, in the north central United States.
GEOREF: UKDA30000000
LAT‐LONG: 45.0 N latitude, 93.0 W longitude
Maidenhead: NN65SA00A00
MGRS: 46TEQ3940783071
USNG: 15T WK 00000 82950
UTM: 46T 539407mE 4983071mN
Approximate magnetic declination is 3 degrees east.
Time zones:
Central Time Zone (‐ 6 hours from Universal Coordinated Time – UTC)
Central Standard Time (CST): UTC ‐ 6 hours
Central Daylight Time (CDT): UTC ‐ 5 hours
Military Time Zone: Sierra (‐6 hours from Zulu (UTC))
Hennepin County is the largest of Minnesota's 87 counties. With more than 1.2 million residents, it
supports almost a quarter of the state's population. Minneapolis, the county seat, is the largest of its 41
cities. Its population is projected to grow to 1,394,660 by 2030, an increase of approximately 2 percent.
Population:
The estimated population of Hennepin County is 1,260,121 (2022) +9.2% from 2010.
Housing units: 513,414 (2012), 571,408 (2022)
Households: 529,029 with an average 2.35 persons per household (2018‐2022)
Median household income: $63,559 (2012), 92,595 (2022)
Percentage of population below the poverty level: 12.6% (2012) 10.8% (2022)
Percentage of population under age 18: 22.5% (2012) 21.3% (2022)
Percentage of population over age 65: 11.9% (2012) 15.8% (2022)
Percentage of foreign‐born persons: 12.7% (2012) 13.7% (2018‐2022)
Non‐English language spoken at home: 16.6% (2012) 18% (2022)
Households with a computer 96% (2018‐2022)
Households with broadband internet subscription 91.5% (2018‐2022)
Governmental units in Hennepin County:
Number of incorporated cities: 45
Number of unincorporated areas: 1 (Fort Snelling)
Special jurisdictions or districts with own police and/or fire services: 5
Fire departments or districts: 30
Law enforcement agencies and police departments: 33
School districts: 22
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
34
4.2. Physical Features
Hennepin County landforms were formed in the recent geological past by the action of glaciers that
receded from the area about 10,000 years ago. The surface of the county may be classed into three broad
types. Smooth plains of outwash and river terraces are found especially in the northeast. Belts of hills and
gently rolling plains are interspersed throughout the rest of the county. Drainage is dominated by the
Mississippi River into which all other Hennepin County streams empty, either directly or indirectly. The
next major river is the Minnesota which forms the southern boundary of the County. The Crow River forms
the northwest boundary of the County. Seven other important streams course through the county. The
southwest portion of Hennepin County is dominated by Lake Minnetonka, a 14,528‐acre (59 square
kilometer) body of water.
Area:
Hennepin County has an area of 607 square miles (1,572 square kilometers)
Land area: 554 square miles (1,435 square kilometers) or 91%
Water area: 53 square miles (137 square kilometers) or 9%
Physical features:
Mean elevation is 925 feet (282 meters) above sea level.
Highest elevation: 1120 feet (341 meters) above sea level Minnetonka: 44.919 N, ‐93.459 W
Lowest elevation: 686 feet (209 meters) above sea level Fort Snelling: 44.893 N, ‐93.177 W
Vertical Relief: 434 feet (132 meters)
Hennepin County Geographical Space 2024
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
35
4.3. Diversity (see Section 7, Appendix 6‐ Community Map Series, Population)
In 2021, there were 5.14 times more White (Non‐Hispanic) residents (856k people) in Hennepin County,
MN than any other race or ethnicity. There were 167k Black or African American (Non‐Hispanic) and 91.2k
Asian (Non‐Hispanic) residents, the second and third most common ethnic groups. 7.03% of the people in
Hennepin County, MN are Hispanic (89.3k people).
4.4. Income (see Section 7, Appendix 6‐ Community Map Series, Income and Poverty)
Hennepin County remains one of the wealthiest counties in Minnesota with an average per capita income
of $55,199 and median family income of $92,595 compared to a statewide median family income of
$84,313.
From Data USA, in 2022, 9.88% of the population for whom poverty status is determined in Hennepin
County, MN (123k out of 1.25M people) live below the poverty line, a number that is lower than the
national average of 12.6%. The largest demographic living in poverty are Females 18 ‐ 24, followed by
Females 25 ‐ 34 and then Males 18 ‐ 24.
The most common racial or ethnic group living below the poverty line in Hennepin County, MN is White,
followed by Black and Hispanic. 15.7% of the population was living with severe housing problems in
Hennepin County, MN. From 2014 to 2022, the indicator did decline 1.47%. The following graphics are
based on 2021 demographics.
Racial disparities in poverty and per capita income can be partially explained by racial/ethnic differences
with factors such as family types, income distribution, and families with more than one child. While not
an exhaustive list, a recent example from Hennepin County that would affect poverty status or per capita
income across racial/ethnic groups include: a higher proportion of Hennepin County’s American Indian
and Black/African American families where single females are the head of household.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
36
Race or Ethnicity
Age
Gender, Race, and Ethnicity
4.5. Employment
From 2020 to 2021, employment in Hennepin County, MN grew at a rate of 1.2%, from 696k employees
to 705k employees.
The most common employment sectors for those who live in Hennepin County, MN, are Health Care &
Social Assistance (104,452 people), Manufacturing (85,227 people), and Professional, Scientific, &
Technical Services (79,671 people).
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
37
4.6. Infrastructure
Hennepin County has a well‐developed highway system. The Hennepin County Highway System consists
of approximately 571 miles of roadway. The Highway System is divided into two categories: County State
Aid Highways and County Roads. The County Road system consists of approximately 80 miles of roadway.
Metro Transit in Minneapolis recorded more than 42 million rides across all light rail, bus, and paratransit
services in 2022, up 17% compared with total ridership in 2021. Light‐rail ridership increased 16% year
over year with more than 12 million riders.
Xcel Energy, Wright‐Hennepin Electric and Minnesota Valley Electric are public utility companies that
provide natural gas and electric service to over 1 million residents in Hennepin County.
Maintaining an adequate supply of safe drinking water requires attention, investment, and responses to
new and ongoing challenges. Sustainable water resources are critical to personal and public health as well
as our economy. Protecting water sources, treating water, and testing water after it is treated are part of
the multi‐barrier approach to assuring an adequate supply of water that is safe to drink. The Minnesota
Department of Health protects our drinking water.
4.7. Land Cover (see Section 7, Appendix 6‐ Community Map Series, Geography)
Hennepin County consist of 388,100 acres of land that is divided into the following land cover:
Artificial Surfaces and Associated Areas
Planted or Cultivated Vegetation
Forests
Woodlands
Shrublands
Herbaceous
Nonvascular Vegetation
Sparse Vegetation
Water
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
38
4.8. Watersheds (see Section 7, Appendix 6‐ Community Map Series, Bodies of Water)
Watersheds are managed by either a Watershed Management Organization or a Watershed District. Both
are considered a separate unit of government and are governed by a Board of Commissioners. Watershed
District board members are appointed by the Hennepin County Commissioners, while Watershed
Management Organization board members are appointed by individual city councils.
Metro watershed management plans address:
protection, preservation, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention
systems.
minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water quality problems.
identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality.
establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater
management.
prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems.
promote groundwater recharge.
protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities; and
secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater.
Watershed organizations in Hennepin County are:
Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission
Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission
Lower Minnesota River Watershed District
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
Mississippi Watershed Management Organization
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
Pioneer‐Sarah Creek Watershed Management Commission
Richfield‐Bloomington Watershed Management Organization
Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District
Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission
West Mississippi River Watershed Management Commission
4.9. School Districts (see Section 7, Appendix 6‐ Community Map Series, School Districts)
There are 22 independent school districts in Hennepin County, two of which were part of the Mitigation
Planning Team. The following is a table of those Districts.
Hennepin County Independent School Districts
Special ISD 1 ‐ Minneapolis ISD 279 – Osseo
ISD 011 ‐ Anoka‐Hennepin ISD 280 – Richfield
ISD 110 – Waconia ISD 281 – Robbinsdale
ISD 111 – Watertown‐Mayer ISD 282 – St. Anthony
ISD 270 – Hopkins ISD 283 – St. Louis Park
ISD 271 – Bloomington ISD 284 ‐ Wayzata
ISD 272 – Eden Prairie ISD 286 – Brooklyn Center
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
39
ISD 273 – Edina ISD 728 – Elk River
ISD 276 – Minnetonka ISD 877 – Buffalo
ISD 277 ‐ Westonka ISD 879 – Delano
ISD 278 ‐ Orono ISD 883 ‐ Rockford
4.10. Future Community Trends for 2040
Hennepin County is facing many changes from shifts in travel behavior, demographics, technology, and
the environment. These shifts will affect how people, goods, and information move in the future. It is
important that we proactively plan to address these changes to achieve our transportation vision.
In anticipation of how community comprehensive plans will be structured for business development,
residential infrastructure, and improvement to transportation corridors It is expected that partnerships
will provide information at to the changes that will affect future hazard mitigation planning. Those city
officials and planners involved in this work tend to share or extrapolate existing community development
patterns providing information required in identifying areas of concern. Generally, the short‐term five‐
to‐ten‐year period has built in predictability with routine accuracy since change is often smaller and the
lead‐time of most large‐scale projects require that planning preparations are scheduled well in advance.
Longer‐term projections or immediate disaster impact planning are much more difficult since land use
policy, lifestyle shifts/attitudes, economic patterns and other actions affecting society are hard to foresee.
Strategic investments and partnerships that leverage geographic diversity, infrastructure, the strength of
the local economy, and increasingly diverse human capital are essential to the continued success and
wellbeing of Hennepin County and its residents.
Socio‐economic
Population growth will continue with an increase of 100K new residents.
Countywide will see an increase in 50K households.
Acknowledging Disparity
People of color in Minnesota and Hennepin County are more likely to use public transportation and are
also more likely to spend 30+ minutes commuting to work compared to their white counterparts.
Challenge: Provide a multimodal transportation system that is affordable and accessible to reduce
the cost of transportation for cost‐burdened households. We also must ensure that shared mobility
and other technological advances are available to all residents regardless of economic status.
The County will continue to grow more racially and ethnically diverse. Migration and birth rates
continue to move the county toward a less homogeneous people. This will bring different
expectations of the county and the region.
Aging Population
Meeting the needs of an older population will require adjusting our services and infrastructure. In 1990,
1 in 10 Hennepin County residents were aged 65 or older. By 2040, it is estimated this will increase to 1 in
3 residents.
Challenge: Create a transportation system that provides safe, accessible, and affordable
transportation options to enable our growing senior population to age in place and remain healthy,
active, and socially connected.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
40
We will experience an aging population. Meeting the needs of an older population will require
adjusting our services and infrastructure. An older population may work less overall but also has
more time and expertise to share.
Climate Change
Increased temperature variation, precipitation levels, and the frequency of extreme weather events are
impacting design, construction, maintenance, and operations of our transportation system resulting in
increased lifecycle costs.
Challenge: We will need to explore emerging technologies and employ innovative practices to reduce
the impact of the transportation system on the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the natural
resources we enjoy.
Weather pattern change will force adaptation in our infrastructure, services, and society. The
county will also face pressure to reduce its contribution to climate change.
Economy
Economic growth in Hennepin County depends on an efficient, reliable, and affordable transportation
system to maintain competitive commute times, retain, and attract businesses, and support efficient
movement of freight.
Challenge: Use technology and innovation to support economic growth and personal and freight
mobility by making more efficient use of the transportation system and preserving and maintaining
our aging infrastructure.
Technology is enabling the rise of a sharing economy and is redefining what work is. No longer
will we build one thing for everyone, and many products won’t be physical. The workforce is
becoming highly connected and mobile.
Infrastructure
More than 30% of our roads are more than 50 years old and are nearing the end of their useful life.
Ongoing maintenance, rehab and replacement is estimated to cost $2 billion.
Challenge: As we rehab and replace infrastructure, we need to explore new ways to incorporate
new technologies, innovations, and adaptations.
Technology
Technology is enabling the rise of a sharing economy and is redefining how, where, and when we work,
travel, and communicate. The transportation sector is relying on data to drive decisions, and on
technology to reimagine how we move people and goods. Mobile access to everything from traffic data
to transit schedules informs our travel choices. Technological advances are changing residents’ lives and
how the county does business and the services we provide.
Challenge: While technological advancements have the potential to improve safety, mobility, and
efficiency, we must recognize that without proactive planning and policy interventions, the
technologies could result in increasing sprawl, vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions, and limiting access for disadvantaged communities. Artificial Intelligence and
Generative pre‐trained transformers have opened avenues with deep learning and machine
learning and have positive and negative implication in its use.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
41
Transportation
Preferences are changing. In the region, people are driving less, using a variety of transportation modes,
and showing a clear preference for living in walkable, transit‐accessible neighborhoods.
Challenge: Hennepin County residents expect new and diverse mobility options that are affordable
and available throughout the county.
Mobility is rapidly evolving. Options for how we travel are expanding and our preferences are
changing, too. The sharing economy, transit, and autonomous vehicles have the potential to
profoundly and rapidly change how people get around. What we do today might not align with
future mobility needs.
Our infrastructure is aging. Many of our systems were built in the second half of the 20th century.
That infrastructure needs maintenance, but society has not budgeted for it. There are
opportunities to rethink these systems as we rebuild, incorporating new goals and technologies.
Local land use development patterns E1a
The principal guide in the forecasting of future land use development is with the comprehensive plans of
the individual Hennepin County municipalities. All 45 municipalities provide future land development
information on what types of land uses and the intensities of development they expect over the next
twenty years.
Land use planning, designations, and zoning are vested in the authority of individual municipalities.
Hennepin County will continue to collaborate with these agencies during activities such as development
reviews, corridor studies, and project improvements to encourage increased development densities,
expanded access to transit, transit corridor and station area planning. Hennepin County actively promotes
specific types of land use and development, including TOD, affordable housing, and brownfield
redevelopment through the incentive‐based funding programs, Transit‐Oriented Development,
Affordable Housing Incentive Fund, and the Environmental Response Fund, respectively.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
42
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
43
SECTION 5 COMMUNITY CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT
5.1. Community Planning Tool Assessment C1a, C1b
Hennepin County Emergency Management (HCEM) uses a variety of hazard mitigation implements to
assist local emergency managers identify additional capability that can be used to pay down risk. The
capability tables are meant to be informative with an understanding to build or be aware of plan sets,
programs, relationships, funding, training, and regulation. This capability assessment provides overall
awareness and can leverage what a community could draw from in making decisions about mitigation
actions or significant events. With respect to each community‐ each community determines their
capability and should consider closing any gaps if they come across an area not identified as a capability.
The capability listings in this section enables emergency managers a program to improve community
resilience through actions taken before, during and after a significant event that is within local capabilities.
For example, building codes, land use, development ordinances, and regulations are commonly used
which control rate of growth and limit development into flood prone areas.
This 2024 Plan update includes Hennepin County’s second HMP capability assessment. This assessment
was conducted using responses to the City Capabilities Questionnaire that was distributed to all Hennepin
County municipalities. Local emergency managers from each participating jurisdiction were directed to
update the City Capabilities matrix. Capabilities were categorized into planning (TABLE 5.1A),
administrative and technical (TABLE 5.1B), fiscal (TABLE 5.1C) and education and training (TABLE 5.1D).
In addition, a new, Ordinance and Regulation section (TABLE 5.1E) was developed and added to this HMP
revision.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
44
The results of the capability assessment are presented in the following tables.
TABLE 5.1A Planning Capability
Planning Tools
City State
Hazard
Mitigation
Plan
City
Emergency
Operation
Plan
Continuity
of
Operations
Plan
Post
Disaster
Recovery
Plan
Capital
Improvement
Plan
Economic
Development
Plan
Transportation
Plan
Flood
Management
Plan
Comprehensive
Plan
Other
Bloomington X X X X X X X X
Brooklyn
Center X X X X X X CCRP
Brooklyn Park X X X X X X
Champlin X X X X X X X X
Corcoran X X X X
Crystal X X X
Dayton X X X X X
Deephaven X X X X
Eden Prairie X X X X X X X X X
Edina X X X X X X
Excelsior X X X X
Golden Valley
Greenfield X X WMP
Greenwood X X X X
Hopkins X X X X X
Independence X X X X X X X
Long Lake X X X X X X
Loretto X X X X X X X
Maple Grove X X X X X X X
Maple Plain X X X X X X X
Medicine
Lake X X X X
Medina X X X X X X CWS
ERP
Minneapolis X X X X X X X
Minnetonka
Minnetonka
Beach X X X X
Minnetrista X X X X X
Mound X X X X X X
New Hope X X
Orono X X X X
Osseo X X X X
Plymouth
Richfield X X X X X X X X X
Robbinsdale X X X X
Rockford
Rogers X X X X X X
Shorewood X X X X X
Spring Park X X X X
St. Anthony X X IP X X X X
St. Bonifacius X X X X X
St. Louis Park
Tonka Bay X X X X X
Wayzata X X X X X X X
Woodland X X X X X
CCRP: Community Crisis Response Plan
CWS ERP: Community Water System Emergency Response Plan
IP: In Progress
WMP: Water Management Plan
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
45
TABLE 5.1B Administrative and Technical Capability
Administrative and Technical Capabilities
City Planning
Commission
Maintenance
Program
Mutual Aid
Agreements
Community
Rating
System
Member
Emergency
Manager
Community
Planner
Civil Engineer GIS
Specialist
Building
Inspector
Other
Bloomington X X X X X X X X X
Brooklyn
Center X X X X X X X X
Brooklyn Park X X X X X X X X X
Champlin X X X X X X X X X
Corcoran X X X X X X X
Crystal X X X X X X X
Dayton X X X X X X‐C
Deephaven X X X X X X
Eden Prairie X X X X X X X X X
Edina X X X X X X X X
Excelsior X X X X X X X X
Golden Valley
Greenfield X X X X X‐C X‐C X‐C X‐C
Greenwood X X X X X X X X
Hopkins X X X X X X X X
Independence X X X X X X X
Long Lake X X‐C X‐C X X‐C X‐C X‐C X‐C
Loretto X X X X X
Maple Grove X X X X X X X X X
Maple Plain X X X X X X
Medicine
Lake X X X X X X X X
Medina X X X X X X X
Minneapolis X X X X X X X X X
Minnetonka
Minnetonka
Beach X X X X X X
Minnetrista X X X X X X X X
Mound X X X X X X X X
New Hope X X X X X X X
Orono X X X X X
Osseo X X X X X X
Plymouth
Richfield X X X X X X X X
Robbinsdale X X X X X X X X
Rockford
Rogers X X X X X X X X‐C
Shorewood X X X X X X X X
Spring Park X X X X X
St. Anthony X X X X X X X
St. Bonifacius X X X X X
St. Louis Park
Tonka Bay X X X X X X
Wayzata X X X X X X X
Woodland X X X
X‐C: Contracted
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
46
TABLE 5.1C Fiscal Capability
Fiscal Capabilities
City Capital
Improvement
Project Funding
Authority to
Level Taxes for
Specific
Purposes
Utility Fees‐
Water, Storm,
Sewer, Gas,
Electric
Development
Impact Fees
Community
Developmental
Block Grants
Federal/State
Funding
Tax Incremental
Financing (TIF)
Other
Bloomington X X X X X X X
Brooklyn
Center X X X X X X X
Brooklyn Park X X X X X X X
Champlin X X X X X X X
Corcoran X X X X X
Crystal X X X X X X
Dayton X X X X X X
Deephaven X X X X
Eden Prairie X X X X X X X
Edina X X X X X X
Excelsior X X X X X X X
Golden Valley
Greenfield X X X X X
Greenwood X X X X
Hopkins X X X X X X X
Independence X X X X X
Long Lake X X X X X X
Loretto X X X X X X
Maple Grove X X X X X X X
Maple Plain X X X X X
Medicine
Lake X X X X
Medina X X X X X
Minneapolis X X X X X X
Minnetonka
Minnetonka
Beach X X
Minnetrista X X X X
Mound X X X X X X COPF
New Hope X X
Orono X X
Osseo X X X X X X
Plymouth
Richfield X X X X X X X
Robbinsdale X X X X X X
Rockford
Rogers X X X X X X
Shorewood X X X X X X X
Spring Park X X
St. Anthony X X X X X X X
St. Bonifacius X X
St. Louis Park
Tonka Bay X X X X X X X
Wayzata X X X X X X
Woodland X X X X
COPF: Co‐Operative Fire
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
47
TABLE 5.1D Education and Training Capability
Education and Training
City CERT
Team
Regular
Training
Exercises
(Tabletop to
Full‐Scale)
Hazard
Education in
Schools
Citizens
Group or
Non‐Profit
Focused on
EM
Public/Private
Partnerships
Storm
Ready
Fire
Wise
WebEOC Other
Bloomington X X X
Brooklyn
Center X X HSC
Brooklyn Park X X X
Champlin X X X X
Corcoran X X X X
Crystal X X X X
Dayton X X
Deephaven X X
Eden Prairie X X X X X X X X HSEM
Edina X X X X
Excelsior X
Golden Valley
Greenfield X X X
Greenwood X
Hopkins X X X X X X X
Independence X X X X X
Long Lake X X N/A X
Loretto X X X X X X
Maple Grove X X X X
Maple Plain X X X X X
Medicine
Lake X X X
Medina X X X X X
Minneapolis X X X X X
Minnetonka
Minnetonka
Beach X X X
Minnetrista X X X X
Mound X X X X X X RAVE
New Hope X X X X
Orono X X X
Osseo X
Plymouth
Richfield X X X X X X X X
Robbinsdale X
Rockford
Rogers X X X X X
Shorewood X X X
Spring Park X X X
St. Anthony X X X X
St. Bonifacius X X X X
St. Louis Park
Tonka Bay X X X X
Wayzata X X X X
Woodland X X
HSC: Heart Safe City
HSEM: Homeland Security and Emergency Management
RAVE: RAVE Mass Notification System
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
48
TABLE 5.1E Regulations and Ordinances Capability
Regulations and Ordinances
City Building
Codes
Growth
Control
Ordinance
Hazard
Setback
Regulations
Hillside
Ordinance
Historic
Ordinance
Shoreline
Ordinance
Wildfire
Ordinance
Zoning
Ordinance
Floodplain
Regulations
Other
Bloomington X X X X
Brooklyn
Center X X X X X
Brooklyn Park X X X X X
Champlin X X X X X BLF
Corcoran X X X X X
Crystal X X X X
Dayton X X X X X
Deephaven X X X X X X X
Eden Prairie X X X X X X X X X
Edina X X X X X X X
Excelsior X X X X X
Golden Valley
Greenfield X X X X X X BLF
Greenwood X X X X X X
Hopkins X X X
Independence X X X X X X
Long Lake X X X X X
Loretto X X X
Maple Grove X X X X X X X X X
Maple Plain X X X X X X
Medicine
Lake X X X X X X X X
Medina X X X X X X
Minneapolis X X X X X X
Minnetonka
Minnetonka
Beach X X X X X X
Minnetrista X X X X
Mound X X X X X X
New Hope X X X X X
Orono X X X X X
Osseo X X
Plymouth
Richfield X X X X X
Robbinsdale X X X
Rockford
Rogers X‐C X X X X
Shorewood X X X X
Spring Park X X X X X
St. Anthony X X X X X
St. Bonifacius X X X
St. Louis Park
Tonka Bay X X X X X X
Wayzata X X X X X
Woodland
BLF: Bluff Regulation
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
49
5.2. Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program C2a
Flooding is the most common natural hazard. In 1968, Congress created the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) in response to the rising cost of taxpayer funded disaster relief for flood victims and the
increasing amount of damage caused by floods. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
manages the NFIP and oversees the floodplain management and mapping components of the Program.
Nearly 20,000 communities across the United States and its territories participate in the NFIP by adopting
and enforcing floodplain management ordinances to reduce future flood damage. In exchange, the NFIP
makes federally backed flood insurance available to homeowners, renters, and business owners in these
communities.
The National Flood Insurance Program aims to reduce the impact of flooding on private and public
structures. It does so by providing affordable insurance to property owners and by encouraging
communities to adopt and enforce floodplain management regulations. These efforts help mitigate the
effects of flooding on new and improved structures. Overall, the program reduces the socio‐economic
impact of disasters by promoting the purchase and retention of general risk insurance, but also of flood
insurance, specifically.
5.3 National Flood Insurance Program in Minnesota C2a
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is the state administration agent for the NFIP in
Minnesota. The HSEM Hazard Mitigation branch works with the DNR, FEMA other agencies to help
communities develop effective local flood hazard mitigation plans and projects which includes adopting
required ordnances and mitigation plans necessary for the community to be eligible to participate in the
NFIP.
TABLE 5.3: Hennepin County community’s participation in the National Flood Program (as of 2‐01‐2024)
Community status book report for state MN (fema.gov)
Community Name CID Current Eff Map Date
Bloomington 274230B 11/04/16
Brooklyn Center 270151B 11/04/16
Brooklyn Park 270152B 11/04/16
Champlin 270153B 11/04/16
Chanhassen (Hennepin, Carver) 270051B 12/21/18
Corcoran 270155B 11/04/16
Crystal 270156B 11/04/16
Dayton 270157B 11/04/16
Deephaven 270158B 11/04/16
Eden Prairie 270159B 11/04/16
Edina 270160B 11/04/16
Excelsior 270161B 11/04/16
Golden Valley 270162B 11/04/16
Greenfield 270673B 11/04/16
Greenwood 270164B 11/04/16
Hanover (Hennepin, Wright) 270540B 11/04/16
Hopkins 270166B 11/04/16
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
50
Community Name CID Current Eff Map Date
Independence 270167B 11/04/16
Long Lake 270168B 11/04/16
Loretto 270659B 11/04/16
Maple Grove 270169B 11/04/16
Maple Plain 270170B 11/04/16
Medicine Lake 270690B 11/04/16
Medina 270171B 11/04/16
Minneapolis 270172B 11/04/16
Minnetonka 270173B 11/04/16
Minnetonka Beach 270174B 11/04/16
Minnetrista 270175B 11/04/16
Mound 270176B 11/04/16
New Hope 270177B 11/04/16
Orono 270178B 11/04/16
Osseo 270658B NSFHA
Plymouth 270179B 11/04/16
Richfield 270180B 11/04/16
Robbinsdale 270181B 11/04/16
Rockford (Wright, Hennepin) 270182B 11/04/16
Rogers 270775B 11/04/16
Shorewood 270185B 11/04/16
Spring Park 270168B 11/04/16
St. Anthony (Ramsey, Hennepin) 270716# 02/16/12
St. Bonifacius 270183B 11/04/16
St. Louis Park 270184B 11/04/16
Tonka Bay 270187B 11/04/16
Wayzata 270188B 11/04/16
Woodland 270189B 11/04/16
NSFHA‐ No special flood hazard area‐ All Zone C
TABLE 5.3
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
51
TABLE 5.4: Local Implementation of National Flood Insurance Program requirements as of March, 2024.
C2a
Local ImplementaƟon of NaƟonal Flood Insurance Program Requirements
Municipality Has adopted
NFIP minimum
floodplain
management
criteria via
Local
RegulaƟon.
Has
implemented
and enforce
Local
Floodplain
Management
RegulaƟons for
Special Flood
Hazard Areas.
Has partnered
with another
agency to
enforce Local
Floodplain
Management
RegulaƟons for
Special Flood
Hazard Areas.
Has appointed
a local zoning
department or
building official
to implement
NFIP
requirements.
Damaged
structures are
required to be
repaired to
current
floodplain
regulaƟons.
Bloomington Chapter 19, 21 Y N Y Y
Brooklyn
Center
Chapter 152,
secƟon 224
Y N Y Y
Brooklyn Park SecƟon 152 Y N Y Y
Champlin Chapter 114 Y N Y Y
Corcoran Chapter 10 Y N Y Y
Crystal SecƟon 515 Y N Y Y
Dayton Chapter 1000,
1001.09
Y N Y Y
Deephaven SecƟon 1360 Y N Y Y
Eden Prairie Chapter 11,
SecƟon 11
Y N Y Y
Edina Chapter 36,
ArƟcle 10
Y N Y Y
Excelsior Appendix E,
ArƟcle 61
Y N Y Y
Golden Valley Chapter 11 Y N Y Y
Greenfield 152.075 Y N Y Y
Hanover Chapter 10 Y N Y Y
Hopkins ArƟcle 12 Y N Y Y
Independence Chapter 5,
SecƟon 506
Y N Y Y
Long Lake SecƟon 17B Y N Y Y
LoreƩo SecƟon 413:05 Y N Y Y
Maple Grove ArƟcle 7,
Division 4
Y N Y Y
Maple Plain Chapter 10,
ArƟcle 2
Y N Y Y
Medicine Lake Ordinance 86 Y Y* Y Y
Medina SecƟon 826.74 Y N Y Y
Minneapolis ArƟcle 7 Y N Y Y
Minnetonka SecƟon 300.24 Y N Y Y
Minnetonka
Beach
SecƟon 512 Y N Y Y
Minnetrista SecƟon 510.05 Y N Y Y
Mound Chapter 113 Y N Y Y
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
52
Local ImplementaƟon of NaƟonal Flood Insurance Program Requirements
Municipality Has adopted
NFIP minimum
floodplain
management
criteria via
Local
RegulaƟon.
Has
implemented
and enforce
Local
Floodplain
Management
RegulaƟons for
Special Flood
Hazard Areas.
Has partnered
with another
agency to
enforce Local
Floodplain
Management
RegulaƟons for
Special Flood
Hazard Areas.
Has appointed
a local zoning
department or
building official
to implement
NFIP
requirements.
Damaged
structures are
required to be
repaired to
current
floodplain
regulaƟons.
New Hope Appendix D Y N Y Y
Orono ArƟcle 8 Y N Y Y
Osseo Chapter 154 Y N Y Y
Plymouth SecƟon 21660 Y N Y Y
Richfield SecƟon 550 Y N Y Y
Robbinsdale SecƟon 530 Y N Y Y
Rockford 1001.22 Y N Y Y
Rogers ArƟcle 125‐VI Y N Y Y
Saint Anthony
Village
Chapter 154 Y N Y Y
Saint
Bonifacius
Chapter 154 Y N Y Y
Saint Louis Park ArƟcle 4, Div
11
Y N Y Y
Shorewood Chapter 1101 Y N Y Y
Spring Park ArƟcle 6 Y N Y Y
Tonka Bay Chapter 1040 Y N Y Y
Wayzata Chapter 806 Y N Y Y
Woodland Chapter 10 Y N Y Y
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
53
5.4 Repetitive Loss Properties B2c
A Repetitive Loss property is any insurance building for which two or more claims of more than $1,000
were paid by the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) within any rolling ten‐year period, since 1978.
A Repetitive loss property may or may not be currently insurance by the NFIP.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
54
TABLE 5.4: Hennepin County Repetitive Loss Properties by Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction Number of Repetitive Loss
Properties
Type of Property
Bloomington 1 Residential
Brooklyn Park 1 Residential
Dayton 1 Residential
Edina 5 Residential
Golden Valley 2 Residential
Hopkins 1 Residential
Medicine Lake 1 Residential
Minneapolis 7 Residential
Mound 1 Residential
New Hope 1 Residential
Orono 1 Residential
Plymouth 1 Residential
Robbinsdale 1 Residential
Saint Louis Park 1 Residential
Tonka Bay 1 Residential
Wayzata 2 Residential
5.5 Community Rating System (CRS)
There are currently 0 Hennepin County municipalities that participate in the Community Rating System
(CRS).
The Community Rating System (CRS) recognizes and encourages community floodplain management
activities that exceed the minimum NFIP standards. Depending upon the level of participation, flood
insurance premium rates for policyholders can be reduced up to 45%. Besides the benefit of reduced
insurance rates, CRS floodplain management activities enhance public safety, reduce damages to property
and public infrastructure, avoid economic disruption and losses, reduce human suffering, and protect the
environment. Technical assistance on designing and implementing some activities is available at no
charge. Participating in the CRS provides an incentive to maintaining and improving a community's
floodplain management program over the years. Implementing some CRS activities can help projects
qualify for certain other Federal assistance programs.
In exchange for a community's proactive efforts to reduce flood risk, policyholders can receive reduced
flood insurance premiums for buildings in the community. These reduced premiums reflect the reduced
flood risk resulting from community efforts toward achieving the three CRS goals:
1. Reduce flood damage to insurable property.
2. Strengthen and support the insurance aspects of the NFIP.
3. Encourage a comprehensive approach to floodplain management.
Participation in the Community Rating System (CRS) is voluntary. By participating, communities earn credit
points that determine classifications. There are 10 CRS Classes: Class 1 requires the most credit points and
provides the largest flood insurance premium reduction (45 percent), while Class 10 means the
community does not participate in the CRS or has not earned the minimum required credit points, and
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
55
residents receive no premium reduction. The CRS Classes are based on completion of 19 creditable
activities organized into 4 categories:
1. Public Information
2. Mapping and Regulations
3. Flood Damage Reduction
4. Warning and Response
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
56
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
57
SECTION 6 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN MAINTENANCE D
This section describes the system that Hennepin County and participating jurisdictions have established
to monitor, evaluate, and update the HMP; implement the mitigation plan through existing programs; and
solicit continued public involvement with plan maintenance.
6.1. Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan D1, D2
This section of the plan describes the ongoing methods to keep the plan current. It describes how the
plan will be reviewed annually, how the public will be kept involved, and how the plan will be integrated
into other planning mechanisms. It details the formal process that will ensure that this HMP remains an
active and relevant document. The plan maintenance process includes a schedule for monitoring and
evaluating the plan annually, as well as revising it every five years. This section also describes how the
county will integrate public participation throughout the plan maintenance process.
Minimum changes have been made to these processes since the 2018 plan adoption. However, COVID‐
19 did change the way meetings were conducted. Many meetings were put on hold. Remote and hybrid
work were eventually developed which still delayed much of the maintenance work as minimal
representation attended these annual review meetings. Additional information will be presented at the
Hennepin Emergency Managers Community quarterly meeting.
6.1.1. Monitoring D2a, D2b
HCEM is tasked with the overall responsibility of monitoring this HMP. HCEM will develop a Local
Mitigation Strategy Working Group (LMS). The HMP project will continually be under review as
FEMA guidance is always evolving. This guidance will inform participants of funding sources,
current project considerations for application, and assist in prioritizing funding availability for
participating jurisdictions. By monitoring the implementation of the plan, HCEM and the LMS will
be able to assess which projects are moving forward, which projects we be delayed, which have
been completed, and which are no longer feasible or require additional planning as they no longer
meet federal or state criteria. Finally, the LMS will periodically inform the public about the
progress and success of its efforts through various community website or social media platforms.
The LMS will continue to meet regularly and communicate via email. As part of the monitoring,
evaluation and enhancement process, a participating jurisdiction meeting will be held in the 3rd
Quarter (Jul, Aug, Sept) annually, to create a best practice program. The LMS will be able to
address the following: FEMA updates, State updates, grant updates, and the application process.
Attendance and minutes must be kept supporting this HMP update in future revisions.
6.1.2. Evaluation D2b
Plan recommendations will be reviewed at the annual LMS meeting. The meeting will be used to
determine the effectiveness of mitigation plan programs and make changes that may affect
mitigation projects, priorities, or funding sources. As part of the evaluation process, responsible
agencies will be invited to share any updates on their mitigation projects at the meeting.
In addition, the following questions will be asked:
Are there any new hazards developed not addressed in the plan?
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
58
Have any communities experienced natural disasters that will need to be added in the plan?
Have any unanticipated developments occurred that is vulnerable to hazards (CIKR, zoning,
land use)?
Are there any additional mitigation ideas that need to be incorporated?
What projects are being considered, been initiated, and or completed?
What are the barriers to completing projects identified in the plan?
Are our HMP goals still reflective of community priorities to reduce hazard vulnerabilities?
Is there an open Presidential Disaster Declaration that has made mitigation monies available?
The purpose of these questions is to gauge community partners goals, objectives, and actions and
if they are still current and what changes need to be made in the plan. An update will be required
at the annual meeting and can be submitted any time to HCEM. The discussion will be
documented so that when the plan is revised, findings can be considered or incorporated in the
next five‐year plan revision.
Finally, the LMS will also evaluate how overall strategies and policies that drive augmentation,
revision, or implementation. Programs and policies for review may include but not limited to:
Sustainability
Critical Infrastructure
Climate initiatives
Underserved populations
Economic Growth
Growth Management
Environmental Preservation
Historic Preservation
Redevelopment
Health and/or safety
Recreation
Land use/zoning
Public Education and Outreach
Transportation
Technology
6.1.3. Updating the Plan D2c
HCEM receives a one‐year notification from Minnesota’s Homeland Security Emergency
Management‐ State Hazard Mitigation Officer. This notification indicates that the current adopted
plan will expire in approximately one year. This is the official notice to begin modifying the HMP.
Any of the following situations could trigger a review and update of the plan:
Occurrence of a major natural disaster in Hennepin County
Five‐year plan expiration
Change in state of federal regulations which direct or guide compliance.
The HMP will be periodically reviewed and updated by HCEM every five years unless it has
undergone a more recent revision (with associated FEMA approval). At the five‐year mark, several
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
59
questions will be asked:
Do the goals address current and expected conditions?
Meet the FEMA guidance elements list.
Has risk changed for participating jurisdictions?
What additional hazard events have occurred or have been tracked between the five‐year
planning period?
Have the community capabilities changed with planning, administrative and technical, fiscal,
training and education, and regulation and ordinance?
What progress has been made to complete mitigation actions?
How has the public remained involved over the past five years?
Have a participating jurisdictions critical infrastructure prioritization changed (CFI 1‐5)
6.2. Five Year Revision Procedure
When a major natural disaster occurs in Hennepin County, the staff from HCEM and the LMS working
group will meet following the recovery effort to review and determine if changes will be required to the
HMP. In the absence of a major natural disaster, the five‐year review will take place during the 12‐month
period preceding the State of Minnesota HSEM plan expiration notification letter. Following proper
notification for record, the Hennepin County Emergency Management Plans & Systems Integration
Coordinator will convene a review committee, and with their assistance, carry out the following tasks:
Create a timeline for completion.
Determine if current goals are still valid?
Meet one on one with each jurisdiction.
Review community capability data.
Compare historical hazards against local critical infrastructure.
Prioritize continuity by identifying priority 1 critical facilities.
Develop a mitigation projects list that would bring value and pay down risk for participating
jurisdictions.
Prepare a final draft. Submit to HSEM for FEMA element crosswalk compliance.
Present to County Board for Adoption and submit adoption to State and FEMA
Complete the participating jurisdiction plan adoption/resolution process and submit those by city
resolutions to State and FEMA
Receive FEMA approval letters for all participating jurisdictions.
6.3. Public Involvement D1a
The public is encouraged to be involved in the continual updates of the HMP. The following methods of
public involvement are options to ensure they are successful in having access. As technology or
accessibility matures, additional methods of public involvement will be implemented. For the previous
2018 plan, a redacted plan was available on Hennepin County’s website for the past 5 years. An
unredacted copy was provided to participating jurisdictions, departments, elected officials, and partner
agencies. HCEM will continue to be the lead agency to ensure the public remains involved over the next
five years via the following methods:
HCEM will use social media via Facebook and Twitter to inform the public as to the availability of
information and draft plan documents for review. This platform will be used extensively going
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
60
forward in engaging the public in ongoing hazard mitigation planning for public awareness.
Each jurisdiction having a dedicated website can post a redacted HMP as received from the Plans
& Systems Integration Coordinator for public consumption. The HC link can also be shared on their
city web page, or a redacted copy can be imported into a city web site.
HCEM and LMS working group will lead efforts to prepare and disseminate an annual fact sheet
on status of hazard mitigation planning and implementation to all stakeholders. These materials
will be passed out at various community engagement activities, regional planning working group
meetings, and at Hennepin Emergency Management Community quarterly meetings.
HCEM will continue to create a survey for the public that asks for feedback regarding their
understanding of hazard mitigation and various hazards in their communities. These survey forms
will be shared with participating jurisdictions for their use as well. These surveys will be
distributed at various community engagement activities.
6.4. Implementation of the HMP through Existing Programs and Plans A4a, D3
All participating jurisdictions will need to integrate this HMP into relevant government decision‐making
processes or mechanisms, where feasible. This includes integrating the recommendations or actions of
this HMP into other local planning strategies, processes, or by using local comprehensive or capital
improvement plans, as a project bridge, where funding may be allocated from multi sources. All
jurisdictions must be cognizant of their objectives and actions in that they do not increase hazard
vulnerability in Hennepin County.
Although it is recognized that there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this Plan into
other local planning strategy, the development and maintenance of this stand‐alone HMP is very effective
and an appropriate method ensuring successful implementation of local hazard mitigation projects.
TABLE 6‐4A below includes existing processes and programs through which the HMP could be
implemented. These processes and programs can also integrate this plan into their planning mechanisms.
E2c
TABLE 6.4A Integration of Plans D3a, D3b, D3c
Process Action Implementation of Plan
Administrative Departmental or
organizational work
plans, policies, and
procedural changes.
2019 State Hazard Mitigation Plan
HC Solid Waste Management Master Plan
HC Transportation Mobility 2040 Plan
HC 2021 Climate Action Plan
HC Natural Resources Strategic Plan 2015‐2020
HC 2040 Comprehensive Plan
Administrative Other Organizations’
Plans
Three‐Rivers Park District 2040 system Plan
Met Council’s 2023‐2028 Metro HRA and Regional
Parks CIP
Minneapolis Parks and Recreation Board (MPRB) Land
Policy
Minneapolis Resource Management Plan
2017‐2027 Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Water
Management Plan
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
61
Process Action Implementation of Plan
2015‐2025 Bassett Creek Watershed Management
Plan
2018‐2027 Lower Minnesota Watershed District
Management Plan
2018‐2027 Richfield‐Bloomington Watershed
Management Plan
Three Rivers Park Sustainability Plan
Elm Creek Watershed Management Plan
Pioneer‐Sarah Creek Watershed Third Generation
Watershed Management Plan
West Mississippi Watershed Third Generation Water
Management Plan
Shingle Creek Watershed – Third Generation Water
Management Plan
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Comprehensive
Water Resources Management Plan and individual
sub‐water shed plans.
Municipality Surface Water Management Plans
Xcel Energy Upper Midwest Resources Plan 2016‐2030
Metropolitan Council 2040 Transportation Policy Plan
Metropolitan Council 2040 Water Resources Policy
Plan
Metropolitan Council 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan
Include reference to this plan in Area Planning Group
Emergency Plans.
2030 Regional Parks Capital Improvement Program
Municipality Comprehensive Plans
Municipality Storm Water Management Plans
Municipality Stream Bank Restoration/Stabilization
Plans/Projects
Municipality Well Head Protection Plans
Include references in creation of
ordinances/resolutions or public education campaigns.
Include reference in watershed district plans.
Include reference in County storm water management
plan.
HC Emergency Operations Plan
Administrative Job Descriptions Unpaid internships/and or Paid On call staff to assist in
HMP maintenance.
Budgetary Capital and
operational budgets
Review county and jurisdictional budgets to include line‐
item mitigation actions
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
62
Process Action Implementation of Plan
Regulatory
Ordinances and other
directives
Comprehensive planning ‐ institutionalize hazards
mitigation for new construction and land use.
Comprehensive Planning – institutionalize hazard
mitigation techniques for new home construction
(Windstorm Mitigation Manual)
Zoning and Ordinances
Building Codes ‐ enforcement of codes or higher
standard in hazard areas.
National Flood Insurance Program ‐ Continue to
participate in this program and increase participation
throughout the county in the Community Rating
System Program.
Continue to implement storm water management
plans.
Municipality shoreline ordinances
Funding
Secure traditional
sources of financing
Apply for grants from federal or state government,
nonprofit organizations, foundations, and private
sources including Pre‐Disaster Mitigation Program
(PDM‐DMA 2000), Flood Mitigation Assistance
Program (FMA), and the Hazard Mitigation Grant
Program (HMGP‐Stafford Act, Section 404).
Research grant opportunities through U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development’s Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG).
Other potential federal funding sources include:
- Stafford Act, Section 406 – Public Assistance
Program Mitigation Grants
- Federal Highway Administration
- Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
- United States Fire Administration
- United States Small Business Administration Pre
and Post Disaster Mitigation Loans
- United States Department of Economic
Development Administration Grants
- United States Army Corps of Engineers
- United States Department of Interior, Bureau of
Land Management
- Other sources yet to be defined
Partnerships
Develop creative
partnerships, funding,
and incentives.
Public‐Private Partnerships
Community Emergency Response Team (CERT)
Community Volunteers
State Cooperation
Hennepin County Natural Resources Partnership
In‐Kind resources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
63
Appendix A Regional Review Working Group Meeting Minutes
Reference to: Section 3 3.12 page 20‐21
Regional Review Working Group Meeting Minutes #1 November 10, 2022
Hennepin County Memo
DATE: 11/10/22
TO: Eric Waage
FROM: Bruce Kelii
SUBJECT: 2023 HMP Regional Review Working Group, Kick off, Meeting #1
The first meeting of the HMP Regional Review Working Group took place on November 10, 2022. The
Working Group members present were:
Bruce Kelii‐ Deputy Director‐ Hennepin County Emergency Management
Scott Gerber‐ South Regional Chair‐ Eden Prairie Fire
Mark Ray‐ North Regional Chair‐ Crystal Public Works
Paul Falls‐ Lakes Regional Chair‐ Minnetrista Police
Eric Gustafson‐ East Regional Chair‐ Office of Emergency Management‐ Minneapolis
The main agenda item for this kick‐off meeting was for the Regional Review Working Group (RRWG)
to receive notification that the Hazard Mitigation Plan is due for adoption. Review the 2018 HMP and
to go over the FEMA Local Mitigation Handbook and review all 44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plan
requirements. The RRWG has the overall responsibility of recommending plan revisions, while the
Mitigation Planning Team, once determined, will be tasked with updating their jurisdiction mitigation
project strategies, objectives and actions, risk assessment, prioritizing, and plan monitoring,
evaluating and maintenance.
The next Regional Review Working Group Meeting is set for April 20, 2023.
Bruce Kelii
Deputy Director
Hennepin County Emergency Management
612‐596‐0249
bruce.kelii@hennepin.us
Regional Review Working Group Meeting Minutes #2 April 20, 2023
SECTION 7 APPENDICES
Emergency Management Phone: 612‐596‐0250
1600 Prairie Drive Fax: 763‐478‐4001
Medina, MN 55340‐5421 TDD: 763‐478‐4030
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
64
Hennepin County Memo
DATE: 04/20/23
TO: Eric Waage
FROM: Bruce Kelii
SUBJECT: 2023 HMP Region Review Working Group, Meeting #2
The second meeting of the HMP Regional Review Working Group took place on April 20, 2023. The
Working Group members present were:
Bruce Kelii‐ Deputy Director‐ Hennepin County Emergency Management
Scott Gerber‐ South Regional Chair‐ Eden Prairie Fire
Mark Ray‐ North Regional Chair‐ Crystal Public Works
Paul Falls‐ Lakes Regional Chair‐ Minnetrista Police
Eric Gustafson‐ East Regional Chair‐ Office of Emergency Management‐ Minneapolis
The agenda
• Mitigation Planning Team makeup
• 44CFR Element Review
• 2020 Funding Distribution‐ all applications
• Hennepin County Natural Hazards
• Plan Vision/ Timeline
• Products and Documents
• Survey Completed
• Vision and Mission
• Next Steps
The bench of work discussion
1. Jurisdiction Participation
2. 2018 Mitigation Strategy Review, Updates, Progress reports
3. Critical Infrastructure Index (CF1‐CF5 prioritizing)
4. Capability Assessments
5. Dashboards
6. Hazard Rankings
Next steps
1. Meet with Cities to prepare their plan portion.
2. Discuss assessments.
3. Strategy Reviews
Emergency Management Phone: 612‐596‐025o
1600 Prairie Drive Fax: 763‐478‐4001
Medina, MN 55340‐5421 TDD: 763‐478‐4030
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
65
4. CIKR updates
5. Capability Assessments
6. Dashboard Improvement
7. Historical Data
The next Regional Review Working Group Meeting is set for May 18, 2023.
Bruce Kelii
Deputy Director
Hennepin County Emergency Management
612‐596‐0249
bruce.kelii@hennepin.us
Regional Review Working Group Meeting Minutes #3 May 18, 2023
Hennepin County Memo
DATE: 5/18/23
TO: Eric Waage
FROM: Bruce Kelii
SUBJECT: 2023 HMP Region Review Working Group, Meeting #1
The third meeting of the HMP Regional Review Working Group took place on May 18, 2023. The
Working Group members present were:
Bruce Kelii‐ Deputy Director‐ Hennepin County Emergency Management
Scott Gerber‐ South Regional Chair‐ Eden Prairie Fire
Mark Ray‐ North Regional Chair‐ Crystal Public Works
Paul Falls‐ Lakes Regional Chair‐ Minnetrista Police
Eric Gustafson‐ East Regional Chair‐ Office of Emergency Management‐ Minneapolis
The agenda
• Progress Timeline Update
• Cities Scheduled
• Tutorial created to assist Mitigation Planning Teams
• Checklist‐ Products and Documents
The bench of work discussion
Priority of Schedule: Regional Chairs, Minneapolis, South, Lakes, North
Emergency Management Phone: 612‐596‐0250
1600 Prairie Drive Fax: 763‐478‐4001
Medina, MN 55340‐5421 TDD: 763‐478‐4030
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
66
Once initial meeting takes place touch meetings and discussions can follow until jurisdiction is
satisfied through any communication format: one on one, Team Meet virtual, emails, or phone
conversations.
Provide a tutorial for jurisdictions to review after initial review meeting.
The next Regional Review Working Group Meeting is set for June 22, 2023.
Bruce Kelii
Deputy Director
Hennepin County Emergency Management
612‐596‐0249
bruce.kelii@hennepin.us
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
67
Appendix B Social Media and Digital Media Press Release
Reference to: Section 3 3.21 page 29‐30
Hennepin County Website Post December 1, 2022
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
68
Facebook and Instagram Post December 1, 2022
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
69
Instagram Post December 5, 2022
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
70
Example support email December 7, 2022
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
71
Hopkins Website Post January 18, 2023
Brooklyn Center Website Post January 18, 2023
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
72
Minnetrista Website Post January 18, 2023
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
73
Appendix C Survey Questionnaire
Reference to: Section 3 3.22 Page 31
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT RESULTS
Questionnaire Analysis
329 people responded to the survey. To access the questionnaire, participants were provided an informed
consent form letting them know that their information was voluntary, that any free response questions
were optional, and that the results would be published as part of the 2024 HMP. We also wanted to know
how many respondents knew that a Hazard Mitigation Plan existed. 78% of the respondents did not know
the plan existed. This shows that just by participating in the questionnaire, people were learning about
mitigation. The survey asked if they were residents of Hennepin County. Of the 329 responses, 18
indicated they did not reside in Hennepin County.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
74
The next few questions pertained to residency, employment, and city of employment. The city with the
highest participation was Brooklyn Center at 22 %, second was Crystal with 12%. We had participants from
30 of the 47 cities to include Fort Snelling and one choosing “prefer not to answer” in Hennepin County.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
75
An overwhelming 65% of the respondents have lived in Hennepin County 20 or more years. 57%
responded that they work within Hennepin County.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
76
Survey participants worked in 29 different cities with 14% of the respondents working in Minneapolis.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
77
Some personal information was asked. The largest age demographic to respond was between the ages of
61‐71 or 23%
82% of the respondents were white, with 11% preferring not to answer.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
78
Household information was surveyed with questions about income, access and functional needs, and pets
or service animals. 23% of the respondents replied as making less than $60K.
14% said “yes” they have access and functional needs.
59% of respondents had pets and or service animals. With 70% not having an emergency plan for their
animals.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
79
Two questions were asked about having emergency kits. 59% of those responses said that they “did not.”
The reason given by 77% of the respondents was that they did not know what is included in making one.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
80
Two questions were asked about living situation and renters’ insurance. 82% own their home. 59% of
renters carry insurance.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
81
Several questions were included with floodplain and flood insurance. 4% live in a flood plain and 20%
wasn’t sure if they lived in a floodplain with 5% of all respondents having flood insurance.
For the 83% not requiring or needing insurance. 7% was not familiar with it or don’t know if they need it.
80% of the respondents have homeowner coverage if damages occur.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
82
Two questions addressed if a respondent was impacted by a disaster in the past 5 years. If so, what did
they experience? They were able to mark all that apply. 15% were impacted by pandemic, 15% were
impacted by hail, and 11% impacted by severe weather.
The respondents were able to rank hazards. Climate Change received the most concern, with severe
weather and utility failure rounding out the top 3. Participants were also asked if there were other hazards
not listed‐ with the majority of responses as “none”.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
83
Participants were asked to consider what hazards they felt they were most vulnerable too, and what are
they prepared to handle? Respondents were able to select all that apply.
Vulnerable Prepared to Handle
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
84
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
85
Respondents were asked to pick their “Top Three” most reliable and trustworthy information sources.
They were able to select all that apply. 16% each for the National Weather Service, Police, Fire, and EMS
followed by 12% getting their information from TV News
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
86
Respondents were able to rank community asset vulnerability and what assets were most important to
them.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
87
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
88
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
89
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
90
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
91
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
92
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
93
Appendix D Community Map Series
Reference to: Section 4 4.3 ‐4.9 Pages 35‐38
1. Bodies of Water
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
94
B1b
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
95
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
96
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
97
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
98
2. Geography
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
99
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
100
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
101
B1b
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
102
3. Income and Poverty
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
103
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
104
4. Population
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
105
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
106
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
107
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
108
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
109
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
110
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
111
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
112
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
113
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
114
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
115
Appendix E Community Growth Trend Summaries E1a
Each community that participates in this Mitigation Plan was given the opportunity to detail changes in
development that have occurred within their jurisdiction, if that development involved known hazard
prone areas, or if that development impacted underserved communities. The details provided by each
community that fall within the scope of this plan are provided in this appendix.
E.1: Champlin
The City has experienced moderate commercial and residential development over the past few years.
The residential development was mainly single‐family residential subdivisions. None of the new
development has been into any hazard prone areas or has affected vulnerable populations.
E.2: Dayton
The City of Dayton has seen enormous growth in residential and commercial properties. However, that
growth has yet to be in any hazard‐prone areas within the community, such as floodplains, and it has yet
to impact vulnerable populations within the community.
E.3: Edina
Over the past 5 years the City has approved several large scale re‐developments. As these sites were
already developed, there was no impacts on wetland, floodplains or hazard prone areas. There have not
been any developments that have affected vulnerable populations. Each site was reviewed by City staff
and consultants when necessary and found not to have negative impacts. The following projects have
been approved and built: 8 unit townhome replaced a 5‐unit townhome at 5132 Hankerson Avenue; 21‐
unit apartment replaced a day care at 4425 Valley View Road; a 118‐unit senior apartment replace an
office building at 4040 70th Street; a 408 unit apartment replaced a large office building at 4660 77th
Street; A 200 unit apartment replaced an office building at 4911 77th Street; A 196 unit apartment
replaced an office and Perkins at 4917 Eden Avenue; 24,000 square foot medical office replaced a
16,000 s.f. medical office at 6500 Barrie Road; New restaurant, indoor tennis courts and fitness center
built at Interlachen Country Club, 6200 Interlachen Blvd.; A 276 unit apartment replaced an office
building at 4600 77th Street; 4‐unit townhome replaced a beauty salon at 4404 Valley View Road;
Church and school expansion at 5051 Eden Avenue; 3‐story furniture store and restaurant built in the
parking lot at Southdale; 70‐unit apartment replaced a large recording studio at 4100 76th Street; 62
unit apartment replaced a laundromat at 7075 Amundson Avenue; A 10,000 square feet retail building
replaced an office building at 6950 France; A 167 unit apartment replaced a retail building at 3650
Hazelton Road.
E.4: Loretto
The Chippewa Estates Development was completed between 2018‐2020 and consists of four single‐
family residential homes. No part of this development is in a hazard prone area, nor did it affect
vulnerable populations.
E.5: Maple Grove
The City of Maple Grove is a fast‐growing community with a number of large areas undergoing rapid
development. Highlights include development of residential neighborhoods in the area of 105th Avenue,
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
116
construction of a large new headquarters building for Boston Scientific, residential neighborhoods in the
vicinity of the Hindu Temple north of Arbor Ridge Parkway (101st Avenue), as well as numerous other
residential and commercial buildings of various sizes. Maple Grove works within a comprehensive
master plan in coordination with the Metropolitan Council and the State of Minnesota to ensure that
new development has minimal effect on vulnerable populations and limited exposure to hazard prone
areas.
Maple Grove ‐ 105th Avenue Master Plan
In 2018, the City of Maple Grove initiated a planning process to guide future development in the 105th
Avenue North Growth Area. The study area is generally defined by Interstate 94 to the west, Interstate
610 to the south, County Road 81 and the rail line to the north, and Fernbrook Lane to the east.
Core objectives of the 105th Avenue North Growth Area Master Plan were to examine alternatives for
land uses, parks, trails and open space features and guide the design of the infrastructure network
needed to support the desired development. Additionally, another key objective was also to understand
the desires of existing landowners in the study area, some of whom are interested in developing their
property and others, primarily existing single‐family residences, who are interested in remaining. Finding
the right balance for new development, identifying what uses will likely remain, providing future
opportunities for land uses to transition over time, was fundamental to the success of the Master Plan.
The study area includes a variety of development areas, or districts, each with their own unique physical
characteristics and development and/or redevelopment potential. In order to understand and address
the many facets influencing development in the 105th Avenue North Growth Area, the planning team
worked to understand current and future market conditions, existing and currently proposed land uses,
potential transportation enhancements (vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian) and to identify necessary
parks and open space features.
Maple Grove – Gravel Mining Area South Master Plan
The GMA South study area is just over 400 acres. Located north of Interstate 94 and west of US Highway
169. Elm Creek Boulevard bisects the northern portions of the plan area. The existing land uses within
the GMA south area principally material extraction and industrial. Surrounding land uses include
regional‐scale commercial to the west, and low‐density residential to the south across I‐94. Ownership
of the parcels within the GMA South area is limited to a handful of entities.
According to the most recent comprehensive plans for Maple Grove and Brooklyn Park, the area
surrounding the gravel mining area south is envisioned for a wide range of uses. Commercial uses (Arbor
Lakes) are well established to the west and industrial use is expected to continue to the north. Housing
is planned to the west of the parkway shown north of the GMA area. A large business park to the east
across 169 (in Brooklyn Park) is planned to continue. An established neighborhood is located to the
south across I‐94, with some mixed use area available adjacent to the highway.
Maple Grove – Northwest ‐ 610 Master Plan
Existing land uses within the study area primarily consist of agricultural uses and undeveloped open
space. Approximately a dozen rural residences and farmsteads dot the study area. A 20‐acre parcel
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
117
containing the Minneapolis Northwest KOA campground and RV Park is located along Brockton
Lane/County Road 101. The Hindu Society of Minnesota owns approximately 80 acres within the study
area, which includes a Hindu temple facility. Adjoining land uses within Maple Grove City limits include a
combination of single‐family and townhome residences to the south within the Delgany Neighborhood.
Areas further to the southeast, include commercial and retail uses primarily within the Maple Commons
development. Directly west and across I‐94, land uses are similar to those within the study area,
consisting of primarily undeveloped open areas, with larger‐lot single‐family residences.
The City’s proposed 2018 Land Use plan designates the study area primarily low‐medium density
residential. Higher density residential categories are identified within the Hindu Society property in
recognition of their campus master plan. An additional area identified for highdensity residential is
located at the intersection of 105th and 101st Avenues. Areas east of 105th Ave and Lawndale Lane are
designated as mixed use, envisioned to contain a mix of residential, office, and office‐warehouse uses
primarily. The school district property is identified as a future public use.
E.6: Medicine Lake
Medicine Lake is making long‐term improvements to critical infrastructure beginning in the summer of
2024. These projects include complete reconstruction of all streets within the city of Medicine Lake,
municipal water main installation, sanitary sewer upgrades, and lift station reconstruction. Each of these
projects will impact all residents of Medicine Lake.
E.7: Medina
Recent residential development activity in Medina has included single‐family and townhome
development concentrated north of Highway 55. Commercial development included the new Adam’s
Pest Control office building and Loram Warehouse development. Okalee, a new senior housing/assisted
living facility has also been constructed and the Wealshire Memory Care facility has been expanded,
both housing populations with service needs. Development and construction have not been in hazard
prone areas.
E.8: Minneapolis
Minneapolis recently received an application for an addition to an existing home in the floodplain. An
existing home at 4845 James in the FP overlay and AE floodway proposed a building addition. They
received a CUP to build the addition on pilings as opposed to on fill, which would have been permitted
by code as of right. The proposed floor elevations were above the base flood elevation. No other
development that is of relevance to the hazard mitigation plan occurred.
E.9: Minnetrista
The Woodland Cove development has progressed over the past several years in the area just north of
Hwy 7 at Kings Point Road. It includes a variety of housing ranging from townhouses, villa homes, single
family homes and multi‐million dollar lake homes. Within the past year or so we have added
commercial property to include a grocery store, Caribou Coffee, a liquor store and a several hundred
unit apartment complex. Additionally, there are a couple other areas in the city currently zoned for
multi‐family development. None of these areas are prone to hazards.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
118
E.10: New Hope
As an inner‐ring suburb of Minneapolis, the city of New Hope is largely developed, with limited
opportunities for further development. However, New Hope continues to pursue opportunities for
redevelopment in all areas and has seen growth in commercial, industrial, and single‐family housing
areas, despite some slowing during the COVID19 pandemic. Single‐family home values have risen
steadily the past few years, increasingly the valuation of property for homeowners and slowly growing
the overall tax base of the city. The city’s population has held steady around the 21,000 mark for several
years, and population diversity remains relatively steady year‐over‐year.
A new consideration for the community to incorporate into vulnerability planning is the addition of a
new residential development. This development was completed on a 8.7 acre site, consisting of 32
single‐family homes near a known Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) freight railway, which does
transport hazardous materials, including crude oil. Continued development and redevelopment near
this transport site is a consideration going forward.
E.11: Plymouth
The City of Plymouth has recently developed the Hollydale Golf Course into a residential neighborhood.
This 160‐acre development is located east of Holly Lane N between the 4600‐block and the 5900‐block.
There are 231 lots for single family homesThere are no hazard prone areas in this new development.
Enclave mixed use project is currently under construction. The property is located along Bass Lake Rd,
west of Hwy 169 and consists of 19 acres. The project will contain commercial, office and mixed use
retail/residential. There are no known hazard prone areas in this development.
Parkera and Twin Cities Orthopedics: is currently under construction and is a redevelopment site of
Dundee Nursery. The site was remediated during initial construction and there are no known hazards.
When complete the site will have a 70,00 Square Foot medical building (complete/TCO) and a 210 unit
multi‐family building with 428 parking spaces (bus transit).
E.12: Robbinsdale
Recent development in Robbinsdale can be characterized as redevelopment of obsolescent or
underutilized commercial and office properties for high density multiple family uses. No building
occurred in any hazard prone areas and there was no impact to vulnerable populations.
E.13: Rogers
Residential Development
The City has seen approximately 2000 new single family lots be platted/subdivided (available for
construction, not necessarily built) over the past 5 years.
New Single Family and Townhome permits
265 new homes (single/townhomes) constructed in 2023.
226 in 2022
256 in 2021
141 in 2020
83 in 2019
Apartments
2019‐2021 – Vincent Woods apartments constructed with 165 units.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 1‐ Background and County Profile
119
2022 ‐ The Frederik apartments were constructed with approximately 175 units.
2023 ‐ Territorial Lofts constructed on Territorial Road, 75 units
2022 ‐ Quest Apartments constructed on 137th Avenue North, 135 units.
Commercial Development
Endeavor Distribution Center (Brockton Lane)
Graco expansion, 440,000 sq ft of industrial expansion of existing Graco facility. (David Koch)
Capitol Beverage Expansion (South Diamond Lake Rd)
Freddy’s/Dunkin strip mall (Main Street)
21st Century Bank (Rogers Drive)
I‐State Trucking (CR81)
Rogers Tennis Club (James Rd)
Primrose Daycare (South Diamond Lake Rd)
Construction of Norbella Senior Living and Memory Care development (40 units) could introduce new
vulnerable populations to the community on South Diamond Lake Road.
No recent developments are in a floodplain.
2024 HENNEPIN COUNTY
MULTI‐JURISDICTIONAL
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
VOLUME 2
Hazard Inventory
01 February 2024
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
TABLE OF CONTENTS- VOLUME 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... 3
SECTION 1: HAZARD CATEGORIES AND INCLUSIONS ...................................................................... 5
1.1. RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS ......................................................................................................... 5
1.2. FEMA RISK ASSESSMENT TOOL LIMITATIONS .............................................................................. 5
1.3. JUSTIFICATION OF HAZARD INCLUSION ....................................................................................... 6
SECTION 2: DISASTER DECLARATION HISTORY AND RECENT TRENDS ............................................... 9
2.1. DISASTER DECLARATION HISTORY ................................................................................................ 9
SECTION 3: CLIMATE ADAPTATION CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................... 11
3.1. CLIMATE ADAPTATION ............................................................................................................... 11
3.2. HENNEPIN WEST MESONET ........................................................................................................ 11
SECTION 4: COMPREHENSIVE NATURAL HAZARD ASSESSMENT PROFILES ..................................... 13
4.1. GEOLOGICAL HAZARDS ............................................................................................................... 13
4.1.1. LANDSLIDES ....................................................................................................................... 13
4.1.2. SINK HOLES ........................................................................................................................ 19
4.1.3. SOIL FROST ........................................................................................................................ 23
4.1.4. VOLCANIC ASH .................................................................................................................. 29
4.2. HYDROLOGICAL HAZARDS .......................................................................................................... 33
4.2.1. FLOODING, URBAN ........................................................................................................... 33
4.2.2. FLOODING, RIVER.............................................................................................................. 39
4.3. METEOROLOGICAL HAZARDS ..................................................................................................... 45
4.3.1. CLIMATE CHANGE ............................................................................................................. 45
4.3.2. TORNADO .......................................................................................................................... 69
4.3.3. WINDS, EXTREME STRAIGHT‐LINE.................................................................................... 81
4.3.4. HAIL ................................................................................................................................... 95
4.3.5. LIGHTNING ...................................................................................................................... 109
4.3.6. RAINFALL,EXTREME ........................................................................................................ 117
4.3.7. HEAT, EXTREME .............................................................................................................. 131
4.3.8. DROUGHT ........................................................................................................................ 143
4.3.9. DUST STORM ................................................................................................................... 153
4.3.10. COLD, EXTREME ............................................................................................................ 159
4.3.11. WINTER STORM, BLIZZARD/EXTREME SNOWFALL...................................................... 169
4.3.12. WINDS, NON‐CONVECTIVE HIGH ................................................................................. 185
4.3.13. ICE STORM .................................................................................................................... 205
SECTION 5: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................... 215
5.1. HAZARD RANKING MAPS .......................................................................................................... 215
SECTION 6: CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY .............................................................................. 233
6.1. INVENTORIES ............................................................................................................................. 233
6.2. NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES ‐ HENNEPIN COUNTY .......................................... 233
6.3. HENNEPIN COUNTY HISTORIC LANDMARK MAPS ................................................................... 241
SECTION 7: CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE KEY RESOURCES (CIKR) ................................................... 249
7.1. CRITICAL FACILITIES INDEX ........................................................................................................ 249
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
5
SECTION 1 HAZARD CATEGORIES AND INCLUSIONS
1.1.1. Risk Assessment Process
Risk from natural hazards is a combination of hazard and vulnerability. The risk assessment process
measures the potential loss to a community, including loss of life, personal injury, property damage and
economic injury resulting from a hazard event. The risk assessment process allows a community to better
understand their potential risk and associated vulnerability to natural, intentional human‐caused and
unintentional human‐caused hazards. This information provides the framework for a community to
develop and prioritize mitigation strategies and plans to help reduce both the risk and vulnerability from
future hazard events.
This section describes the natural hazards that have had historical impact within Hennepin County and
assesses their associated risk with future impact. There are 19 hazards that have affected Hennepin
County and are identified and defined in terms of their range of magnitude, spectrum of consequences,
potential for cascading effects, geographic scope of hazard, historical occurrences, and likelihood of future
occurrences. There were no hazards eliminated in this revision TABLE 1.1A was created to meet FEMA
guidance.
TABLE 1.1A B1a
Eliminated Hazards in 2024
There were no hazards eliminated in this revision
In addition, a thorough geospatial risk analysis was conducted using locally available parcel data and
building values. Further, maps were provided where hazard boundaries and data existed. These
improvements help to provide a more accurate assessment of risk in the county to develop mitigation
actions.
1.1.2. FEMA Risk Assessment Tool Limitations
In 1997, FEMA developed the standardized Hazards U.S., or HAZUS model to estimate losses caused by
earthquakes and identify areas that face the highest risk and potential for loss. HAZUS was later expanded
into a multi‐hazard methodology, HAZUS‐MH, with new models for estimating potential losses from wind
(hurricanes) and flood (riverine and coastal) hazards.
HAZUS‐MH is a Geographic Information System (GIS) based software program used to support risk
assessments, mitigation planning, and emergency planning and response. It provides a wide range of
inventory data, such as demographics, building stock, critical facility, transportation and utility lifeline,
and multiple models to estimate potential losses from natural disasters. The program maps and displays
hazard data and the results of damage and economic loss estimates for building and infrastructure.
However, due to the limitations of the software (only estimates losses for earthquakes, hurricanes, and
floods), Hennepin County did not use this software in 2018 or this new update in 2024. To estimate losses,
Hennepin County Emergency Management used the Hennepin County Critical Infrastructure and Facilities
Critical Facility Index (CFI) Priority Ranking Aid. This CFI was provided to municipalities, Hennepin County
Departments, and special jurisdictions to assist in identifying critical infrastructure and facilities in their
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
6
community and estimate the potential losses. This CFI considers all hazards that were identified in the
Risk Assessment.
1.1.3. Justification of Hazard Inclusion
TABLE 1.3A provides the types of natural hazards that have been identified through analysis and
assessment.
TABLE 1.3A. Natural Hazards B1a
Natural
Hazards
Types Justification for Inclusion
Geological Landslide Countywide vulnerable area, especially where
steep slopes are located, and heavy saturation
occurs.
Sink Hole History of occurrences, poses danger to
population and property
Soil Frost History of occurrences that have caused
infrastructure damage
Volcanic Ash Historic volcanic eruptions (western states) have
spread ash into Hennepin County. Future
occurrences may also impact the county
Meteorological Climate Change There has been climate research done at the
international level through the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and local through
the Minnesota State Climatology Office.
Tornado Hennepin County has a strong history of
tornadoes dating back to 1820. This hazard is a
consistent threat to both life safety and property
Winds, Extreme Straight‐Line Hennepin County has a strong history of derecho’s
dating back to 1904. The Storm Prediction Center
(SPC) also highlights Minnesota as being highly
impacted by derecho activity during the summer
months.
Hail Hailstorms occur during severe convective storms
and are an annual occurrence in Hennepin County.
Very large hail has been recorded back as far as
the National Weather Service has compiled data
(1950). These storms pose a significant threat to
people and infrastructure.
Lightning Lightning is a regular occurrence and is associated
with thunderstorm activity. Hennepin County has
a history of lightning deaths as well as damage to
property and infrastructure
Rainfall, Extreme Hennepin County has had a history of extreme
rainfall events, and the occurrences are becoming
much more frequent. The State Climatology
Office has published sixteen‐year research
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
7
documents on Minnesota flash floods caused by
extreme rainfall.
Heat, Extreme Extreme heat is an annual occurrence in Hennepin
County and there have been several historic heat
waves that have caused both deaths and injuries
to our residents.
Drought Several historic droughts have occurred across
Hennepin County dating back to 1863. These
events cause severe impacts on agriculture and
the economy as well as increasing wildfire
potential.
Dust Storm Hennepin County has a history of dust storms
going back to the 1930’s. These days’ dust storms
are the cascading events of extreme drought.
Cold, Extreme Extreme cold temperatures are an annual
occurrence in Hennepin County, with historic
outbreaks dating back to the 1800’s. These events
pose significant threat to people and
infrastructure.
Winter Storm,
Blizzard/Extreme Snowfall
Hennepin County has a history of winter weather
dating back to the late 1800’s. Varying degrees of
severity occur in Hennepin County due to the
different topography, with the worst conditions
occurring in western Hennepin County.
Winds, Non‐Convective High
Although rare, extreme wind‐producing non‐
convective event may affect well over 100,000
square miles with wind damage, and may produce
extreme impacts over tens of thousands of square
miles
Ice Storm Several ice storms have occurred in Hennepin
County dating back to the 1930’s. These storms
have caused great impact to infrastructure and
people. The cascading effect of power outages is
another threat that has occurred with past ice
storms.
Hydrologic Flooding, River Several historic flood events have occurred due to
the Mississippi, Crow, and Minnesota River in
Hennepin County.
Flooding, Urban Urban flooding is a consistent problem in
Hennepin County, due to torrential rainfall
associated with thunderstorm activity.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
8
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
9
SECTION 2 DISASTER DECLARATION HISTORY AND RECENT TRENDS
2.1. Disaster Declaration History
One method to identify hazards based upon past occurrence is to look at what events triggered federal
and/or state Disaster Declarations in Hennepin County. Disaster Declarations are granted when the
severity and magnitude of the events impact surpass the ability of the local government to respond and
recover. Disaster assistance is supplemental and sequential. When the local government’s capacity has
been surpassed, a state disaster declaration may be issued, allowing for the provision of state assistance.
If the disaster is severe enough that both the local and state government’s capacity is exceeded, a Federal
Declaration may be issued, allowing for the provision of Federal disaster assistance.
It is important to note that the Federal government may issue a Disaster Declaration through the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) and/or the Small Business Administration (SBA), as well as through
FEMA. The quantity and types of damages are the determining factors. Listed below in TABLE 2.1A are
the previous Disaster Declarations that are of concern to Hennepin County. There have been six
presidential declarations since 2010.
TABLE 2.1A. FEMA Declared Disasters (1965‐2023)
Date Disaster Type Assistance
Type
Disaster
Number
April 7, 2020 Minnesota Covid‐19 Pandemic Individual/Public
Assistance
DR‐4531‐MN
March 13, 2020 Minnesota Covid‐19 Public
Assistance
EM‐3453‐MN
November 2, 2016 Severe Storms and Flooding Individual
Assistance
DR‐4290‐MN
July 21, 2014 Severe Storms, Straight Line Winds,
Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides
Public
Assistance
DR‐ 4182‐MN
July 25, 2013 Severe Storms, Straight Line Winds, and
Flooding
Public
Assistance
DR‐ 4131‐MN
June 7, 2011 Severe Storms and Tornadoes Public
Assistance
DR‐ 1990‐MN
March 19, 2010 Flooding Public
Assistance
EM‐ 3310‐MN
August 21, 2007 I‐35W Bridge Collapse Public
Assistance
EM‐2378‐MN
September 13, 2005 Hurricane Katrina Evacuation Public
Assistance
EM‐ 3242‐MN
May 16, 2001 Flooding Individual
Assistance
DR‐ 1370‐MN
June 23, 1998 Severe Storms, Straight‐Line Winds and
Tornadoes
Public
Assistance
DR‐ 1225‐MN
August 25, 1997 Flooding Individual/Public
Assistance
DR1187‐MN
April 8, 1997 Severe Storms/Flooding Individual/Public
Assistance
DR‐ 1175‐MN
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
10
August 6, 1987 Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Flooding Individual/Public
Assistance
DR‐ 797‐MN
July 8, 1978 Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Hail,
Flooding
Individual/Public
Assistance
DR‐ 560‐MN
June 17, 1976 Drought Public
Assistance
EM‐3013‐MN
April 18, 1969 Flooding Individual/Public
Assistance
DR‐ 255‐MN
April 11, 1965 Flooding Individual/Public
Assistance
DR‐188‐MN
TABLE 2.1B. FEMA Declared Disasters (2019‐2023)
Date Disaster Type Declaration
Number
February 21, 2023 Severe Winter Storm EO 23‐02
April 12, 2021 Civil Unrest EO 21‐17
August 26, 2020 Civil Unrest EO 20‐87
May 28, 2020 Civil Unrest EO 20‐64
March 13, 2020 Pandemic EO 20‐01
April 11, 2019 Flooding EO 19‐30
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
11
SECTION 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION CONSIDERATIONS
3.1.1. Climate Adaptation
Climate includes patterns of temperature, precipitation, humidity, wind, and seasons. Climate plays a
fundamental role in shaping natural ecosystems and the human economies and cultures that depend on
the. Climate adaptation refers to the ability of a system to adjust to climate change to moderate potential
damage, to take advantage of opportunities, or to cope with the consequences. The International Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) defines adaptation as the “adjustment in natural or human systems to a new or
changing environment”. Adaptation to climate change refers to adjustment in natural or human systems
in response to actual or expected climatic stimuli or their effects, which moderates harm or exploits
beneficial opportunities.
3.1.2. Hennepin West Mesonet (HWM)
In order to adapt to climate change, Hennepin County has built the Hennepin West Mesonet, a network
of remote sensors which provide highly accurate, near real‐time measurements of weather, soil and water
conditions. Recent experiences across the Twin Cities metro area reveal a long‐standing vulnerability to
dangerous weather or human‐caused conditions that form very quickly without clear advance indications.
Fatal tornadoes in Rogers, MN (2006) and in North Minneapolis, MN (2011) both point to a need for more
complete and rapid surface observations from a network of sensors spread across the area. A fatal
landslide in Saint Paul, MN (2013) also shows that near real time soil temperature and saturation data
across the metro could be useful in providing alerts for evolving dangerous conditions. Other
vulnerabilities exist in our area to rapid‐onset flash flooding, straight‐line winds or hazardous materials
releases which require many sensors with quick detection capability to provide useful public warning or
evacuation decision‐making.
The Hennepin West Mesonet delivers normal at different temporal resolutions, thus providing more
precise climate monitoring. Through climate monitoring, the HWM provides an essential service and
benefit of observing and precisely detecting impacts on the environment and ecosystems both at the
geospatial and temporal scale in Hennepin County. Archived data and current observations provide
consistent and high‐quality information from decision‐makers and researchers, information that can be
utilized for development of research and prediction models, improving understanding of climate
variability, advancing public climate education, and supporting development of mitigation and/or
adaptation measures for local communities.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
12
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
13
SECTION 4 COMPREHENSIVE NATURAL HAZARD ASSESSMENTS
NATURAL HAZARD PROFILES
4.1. Geological Hazards
4.1.1. Hazard Assessment: LANDSLIDES
4.1.1.1. Definition. A landslide is the downward
movement of rock, soil, or other debris along a slope.
Other terms used for landslides are debris flow, earth
flow, mudslide, slump, slope failure, mass wasting, and
rock fall. The rate of landslide movement ranges from
sudden to very slow and may involve small amounts of
material up to very large amounts. The kinds of
movement include falling, sliding, and flowing. Material
can move as an intact mass or become significantly
deformed and unconsolidated. The slopes that have
landslides can range from near vertical to gently rolling
with slopes above 30% having the highest susceptibility.
4.1.1.2. Range of magnitude
Further work is needed among the Hennepin County landslide assessment team to develop range of
magnitude.
4.1.1.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
4.1.1.3.1. PRIMARY CONSEQUENCES:
4.1.1.3.1.1. Transportation: Mobility is frequently stopped or slowed by landslides.
When at the foot of slopes, roads and highways can be impacted by fallen rock, soil flows
and landslide debris. When routes are at the crest of slopes, surfaces may be undercut by
slides and fall away leaving voids and gaps in the road. Railroads are similarly impacted
by landslides. The practice of cut and fill in road and rail grade construction can increase
susceptibility to this problem. Besides direct damage to surface transportation routes,
secondary impacts can occur if vehicles carrying hazardous materials rupture if struck by
slides.
4.1.1.3.1.2. Electric utilities: Electric service lines often follow alongside roads, including
their routes through valleys and ravines or along the crests of slopes. This makes them
vulnerable to disruption from landslides. Cut power lines are a frequent feature of
landslide activity. Landsides impact both lines suspended from utility poles and buried
power lines.
4.1.1.3.1.3. Water, sanitary and storm sewer services: Cracked, broken or leaking water
or sewer lines often have a significant role in triggering landslides in susceptible areas.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
14
Inspections and maintenance of lines in vulnerable locations should be a priority to
reduce risk. Water and sewer lines are also vulnerable to damage and destruction by
landslide events.
4.1.1.3.1.4. Energy pipelines: Gas lines and other energy pipelines that pass‐through
landslide susceptible areas may become weakened or severed by slide action. Damages
may be caused by direct physical impacts or by indirect transmission of stresses through
soil to the pipeline causing weaknesses or deformation of the lines.
4.1.1.3.1.5. Telecommunications: Telecommunications cables that pass‐through
landslide susceptible areas may become weakened or severed by slide action. Damages
may be caused by direct physical impacts or by indirect transmission of stresses through
soil to the cable causing weaknesses or deformation of the lines. Fiber optic lines are
particularly susceptible to deformation which can cause erratic signals or total signal loss.
4.1.1.3.1.6. Structural damage: Landslides impacts to structures ranges from rapid
catastrophic destruction resulting from a landslide impact to gradual degradation of
structures from slow earth movements. Complex load factors act on structures that are
subject to landslide forces. Engineering assessment of compromised structures is vital to
both response and recovery phases of a landslide incident. Landslide impacts to
structures is both a life‐safety hazard and can also be an occasion for costly property
damage.
4.1.1.3.1.7. Recreational impacts: Parks and trails are frequently placed in areas subject
to landslides. Often parks or trails are in scenic areas in ravines or valleys associated with
rivers with natural slopes being a main feature. They may also be part of former railroad
rights‐of‐way that have been abandoned. Human‐modified slopes or other historic
disruptions of natural soils and terrain can elevate landslide susceptibility in parklands.
Slides in parks and trails is a risk to lives and safety, as well as a costly disruption to
recreation activities.
4.1.1.3.2. SECONDARY CONSEQUENCES:
4.1.1.3.2.1. Hazardous material spill or release: If cut by a landslide, pipelines may
release hazardous liquids or gasses, or polluting materials that can threaten lives, impact
property or harm the environment as a secondary hazard after the landslide.
4.1.1.3.2.2. Fire or explosion: In certain instances, landslides may trigger fires or
explosions at the site of buildings or other impacted structures, or where pipelines or
service lines carrying gas or other flammable material.
4.1.1.4. Potential for Cascading Effects
4.1.1.4.1. Life‐Safety: Landslides can result in deaths and have done so in Hennepin County (1955)
and adjacent metro counties (2013). Injuries have resulted in numerous other instances, as well
as close calls. The landslide at Fairview‐Riverside hospital in Minneapolis (2014) narrowly missed
pushing passing motorists on West River Road into the Mississippi River, for instance.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
15
4.1.1.4.2. Infrastructure Destruction: Landslides can impact many kinds of critical infrastructure.
Linear infrastructure such as roads, highways, railroads, pipelines, electric power lines and
telecommunications cables are particularly vulnerable to slides that cross their paths. Water and
wastewater infrastructure is not only vulnerable to slides as a linear system but may also help
trigger landslide activity if a break occurs in water, sewer or storm sewer lines at sites that have
other susceptibility factors. Point infrastructure located at susceptible sites anywhere between
the crest to the foot of slopes are also vulnerable.
4.1.1.4.3. Property Damage: Homes and businesses have been damaged or destroyed by
landslides in Hennepin County and surrounding counties. Lack of detailed landslide investigations
and awareness in some cases have led to development on susceptible terrain. The fact that
landslides are not covered by insurance policies has led to often catastrophic financial losses for
homeowners and businesses that are hit. Expensive litigation has also often resulted from these
incidents between property owners and cities.
4.1.1.5. Geographic Scope of Hazard B1c
Landslide activity depends on certain localized factors (see above critical values) that result in an uneven
distribution of landslides across Hennepin County. In general, Hennepin County landslide activity occurs
in the valley walls of the Minnesota, Mississippi and Crow Rivers and their tributaries. Some of the exposed
glacial sediments and bedrock layers in these valleys are unstable and subject to precipitation or spring‐
induced landslides. In the interior of Hennepin County, small landslides happen in steep slopes in glacial
sediments that are found along streams, ravines, lakeshores, and wetlands. Artificially steepened slopes,
often with disrupted soils and fills, also have been sites for landslides in Hennepin County. A Hennepin
County Landslide Hazard Atlas is in development and is set for release in late 2018.
4.1.1.6. Chronologic Patterns
Further work is needed among the Hennepin County landslide assessment team to develop
Chronological Patterns
4.1.1.7. Historical Data B1d
4.1.1.7.1. HISTORICAL RECORD: Hennepin County Emergency Management commissioned an
assessment of historic landslide activity in the county using archival data and historic news
accounts. There are around two dozen landslides in Hennepin County that were documented in
written accounts including a known location and date.
June 19, 2014 (DR‐4182)
June 1, 2014
April 2014
May 22, 2013
4.1.1.7.2. PRE‐HISTORIC EVIDENCE: Hennepin County Emergency Management commissioned an
assessment of pre‐historic landslide activity in the county using LiDAR (Light Detection and
Ranging) imagery. There are over one thousand sites in Hennepin County with landslide evidence
that have been discovered through imagery analysis.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
16
4.1.1.8. Future Trends B1e
4.1.1.8.1. TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS: The most significant trigger for landslide activity in
Hennepin County is precipitation. Documented trends in precipitation in Minnesota, as well as
projections into the future show an increase in overall rainfall, plus an increase in intense
precipitation events. Recent landslide activity in Minnesota and Hennepin County has risen. It
appears likely that landslide activity will continue to grow in tandem with precipitation trends.
4.1.1.8.2. EVENT PROBABILITIES: More analysis of the recently developed data is needed to
determine landslide event probabilities in Hennepin County.
4.1.1.9. Indications and Forecasting
Further work is needed among the Hennepin County landslide assessment team to develop modeling and
forecasting methods.
4.1.1.10. Detection & Warning
Additional work is needed among the Hennepin County landslide assessment team to develop detection
and warning criteria. Indications of changes in key factors will be accomplished in large part by the
Hennepin‐West Mesonet network of environmental sensors.
4.1.1.11. Critical Values and Thresholds
4.1.1.11.1. Slope. Also called the angle of repose, slope is a critical factor for landslide
susceptibility. In Hennepin County, landslide activity starts to increase above 20% slope, and is
most numerous on slopes between 30‐40%. Slopes may be either natural or artificially created by
human activities.
4.1.1.11.2. Soil type: Soil type is important to landslide susceptibility for several reasons.
Differences in the porosity and permeability of soils is important since it describes the degree to
which soil types will either slowly retain or quickly shed water. Other characteristics such as soil
structure may contribute to slope failure. Many soils in Hennepin have been disrupted or altered
in some way by human activities.
4.1.1.11.3. Soil moisture: Soil moisture is a critical factor in Hennepin County landslides. Among
other things, when water replaces air within soil pores, the overall weight of the soil increases.
Increasing the weight of near surface soils can increase the likelihood of the material moving
downslope and forming a landslide. The Hennepin County landslide assessment is developing
specific soil moisture criteria for alert purposes.
4.1.1.11.4. Precipitation. Precipitation is one of the most critical factors in triggering landslides
in Hennepin County. Duration, intensity, and recurrence of precipitation are important elements
in precipitation‐initiated landslide events. The Hennepin County landslide assessment is
developing specific precipitation thresholds for alert purposes.
4.1.1.11.5. Springs. Springs discharge water along slopes, increasing erosion and helping to trigger
landslides. Springs in Hennepin have been mapped in detail.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
17
4.1.1.11.6. Bedrock. The depth from the surface to bedrock is an important factor in some kinds
of slides. Exposed bedrock is required for rock falls for instance. A shallow depth to bedrock may
also facilitate flows and other forms of slides as well.
4.1.1.11.7. Surface conditions: Vegetation on slopes usually assists in stabilizing them against
failure. Plants with deep root systems, often native species, are recommended to help slow slope
erosion. Conversely, removal of vegetation that results in bare and exposed soil increases the risk
of landslides and mudslides.
4.1.1.11.8. Soil temperature: The action of winter and spring freeze‐thaw cycles seems to help
trigger some rock falls or topples. Thus, these types of landslides are the only ones that appear
to happen outside of the normal rainfall/thunderstorm season of Hennepin County. The freeze‐
thaw cycles allow water, trapped in voids and crevices in rock, to expand and push rock apart,
sometimes triggering a fall.
4.1.1.12. Prevention
Further work is needed among the Hennepin County landslide assessment team to develop prevention
methods.
4.1.1.13. Mitigation
4.1.1.13.1. Avoidance (Prevention). The most effective mitigation measure against landslide
fatalities, injuries, infrastructure disruption and property loss are avoiding development and
certain human activities at sites prone to landslides. This is a preventive action. Avoidance may
be accomplished through evidence‐based zoning policies that utilize local area landslide hazard
assessments that trigger site‐specific landslide investigations when appropriate if development or
other uses are proposed at sites inside identified hazard zones. Specific actions include avoiding
cutting into slope sides or at the food of slopes, and not placing excessive weight on the top of
slopes by erecting structures there.
4.1.1.13.2. Education and public alerts. Education of zoning officials, landowners and need
accurate local information in order to make sound decision regarding their development and
activities in landslide susceptible terrain. A simple knowledge of landslide risk also sets the
foundation for appropriate action when a public alert is issued. Public alert thresholds, messages
and distribution methods must be developed.
4.1.1.13.3. Active mitigation methods. Geometric methods include changes in slope angle to
reduce the chances of landslides. Hydrological methods consider surface, shallow and deep‐
water drainage and attempt to improve the ability of landslide‐susceptible sites to drain water
effectively. Finally, mechanical methods include the use of rock anchors, netting, retaining walls,
or pilings. In general, these methods are expensive and are suitable only of sites of limited size in
areas where development is of high importance.
4.1.1.14. Response
Further work is needed among the Hennepin County landslide assessment team to develop Response
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
18
methods.
4.1.1.15. Recovery
Further work is needed among the Hennepin County landslide assessment team to develop Recovery
methods.
4.1.1.16. References
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
19
4.1.2. Hazard Assessment: SINKHOLE
4.1.2.1. Definition.
A sinkhole is a bowl‐shaped depression in the land
surface. Sinkholes are also called subsidence, which is a
downward settling of the surface without any horizontal
movement. Sinkholes result from natural processes
where near‐surface carbonate bedrock is dissolved by
water to form underground spaces, also called voids.
These voids typically form along existing joints or cracks in
the rock that aid the movement of water. Some voids
grow toward the surface where infiltrating surface waters
meet and flow downward into the drain of the void. This
action weakens the rock. Eventually, the weight of
overlying materials can result in a collapse. Areas
favorable for sinkhole development are called karst terrain. Certain human activities may speed up the
natural sinkhole processes in karst areas. Human activities outside of normal karst terrain can also trigger
unexpected human‐caused ground collapses in materials not usually prone to sinkholes.
4.1.2.2. Range of magnitude
Unknown, pending conclusion of the Hennepin County Emergency Management‐sponsored sinkhole
hazard assessment in 2020.
4.1.2.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
4.1.2.3.1. PRIMARY CONSEQUENCES:
Sinkholes and other land subsidence can cause significant direct damage to buildings, roads, water
supply systems and other infrastructure. The loss of land usable for farming or other development
is another consequence of sinkhole activity. Finally, groundwater contamination is a significant
consequence of karst and sinkhole activity. Subsurface water flow in karst areas creates a
situation where surface water, along with their contaminants, quickly travel deep into aquifers
without significant filtration. The problem is worsened when people use sinkholes as garbage
dumps, which was formerly a common practice in the United States.
4.1.2.3.2. SECONDARY CONSEQUENCES:
4.1.2.3.2.1. Disease. Dumping of wastes into sinkholes maybe a source of disease. A
disease outbreak in Harmony, Minnesota (Fillmore County) was traced to a sinkhole used
as a disposal point for human waste.
4.1.2.3.2.2. Dam failures. There have been instances of dams and other water‐control
infrastructure being undermined by sinkholes and other karst activity.
4.1.2.3.2.3. Fires or explosions. When structures, or infrastructure such as pipelines are
impacted by sinkholes and gas lines are compromised, fires and explosions are possible.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
20
4.1.2.4. Potential for Cascading Effects
In Minnesota, most sinkholes are in rural areas and develop very slowly. These sinkholes are not
dangerous, and they do not cause much destruction except for the loss of crop land. When sinkholes
happen in developed urban areas however, they have the potential to be much more costly and, in some
cases, even dangerous. The active karst areas in southeast Hennepin County are in places with
concentrated developments of housing, businesses, schools and infrastructure. The potential for
destructive sinkhole events in Hennepin County has not been adequately assessed. Hennepin County
Emergency Management is initiating a study of sinkhole hazards in the county that is expected to be
complete by 2020.
4.1.2.5. Geographic Scope of Hazard B1c
The southeastern three‐quarters of Hennepin County is underlain by carbonate bedrock and is karst
terrain. The western and northern limits of this area begin in the south around Excelsior and extend
northward into Medina, then eastward into Brooklyn Center. Most of this area is comprised of covered
karst which has overlying glacial material more than 100 feet in depth. An area with pockets of transitional
karst which has overlying glacial material between 50 and 100 feet thick is roughly bounded in the south
by Edina, west to Wayzata, and northeast to Brooklyn Center. Active karst is found in mostly along the
Mississippi River from North Minneapolis south to Fort Snelling. Scattered outlying pockets of active karst
can be found westward from Golden Valley south to St. Louis Park. Active karst areas have less than 50
feet of overlying material covering them.
Note: Other types of land subsidence are directly caused by human activities and are dealt with in the
human‐caused, industrial/technological section of this hazard assessment. These include water or sewer
system breaks that cause sinkholes or collapse of underground tunnels.
4.1.2.6. Chronologic Patterns
Unknown, pending conclusion of the Hennepin County Emergency Management‐sponsored sinkhole
hazard assessment in 2020.
4.1.2.7. Historical Data B1d
The Seven Oaks Park in south Minneapolis is a sinkhole. The surface depression is approximately 300 feet
wide and over 20 feet deep. The time of formation of the sinkhole is unknown but predates the
construction of the structures around it. Seven Oaks Park is located between E 34th Street and E 35th Street
at 47th Avenue South in Minneapolis (USNG 15T VK 83754 76384). Other possible sinkholes are nearby but
await more definitive confirmation.
There have been no other naturally caused incidents that are within the scope of this plan.
4.1.2.8. Future Trends B1e
Unknown, pending conclusion of the Hennepin County Emergency Management‐sponsored sinkhole
hazard assessment.
4.1.2.9. Indications and Forecasting
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
21
Unknown, pending conclusion of the Hennepin County Emergency Management‐sponsored sinkhole
hazard assessment in 2020.
4.1.2.10. Detection & Warning
Unknown, pending conclusion of the Hennepin County Emergency Management‐sponsored sinkhole
hazard assessment.
4.1.2.11. Critical Values and Thresholds
4.1.2.11.1. Bedrock material: Areas susceptible to sinkholes (karst terrains) are underlain by
water‐soluble, but relatively impermeable bedrock such as limestone (calcium carbonate).
Soluble rocks dissolve when exposed to certain acids, including acidic water. Over time, acidic
water flowing through joints and cracks will dissolve and remove large amounts of soluble rock
creating many void spaces. In more unusual instances, sandstones or even quartzite may develop
sinkholes. In these cases, the bedrock is more permeable, but less soluble. Slower sinkhole
development may occur in these rocks.
4.1.2.11.2. Water acidity: Acidic surface water and groundwater is required for natural sinkhole
formation as the agent that dissolves soluble bedrock. Pure water has a pH of 7.0, which is neutral
– neither acidic nor base. However, water in nature is not pure. Instead, it contains natural
impurities which make it acidic. Unpolluted rainwater has a pH of around 5.6 (acidic). Rainwater
in Minnesota contains atmospheric pollutants which further lower the pH, increasing acidity.
Once at the surface, water can become further acidified by exposure to nitrogen fertilizers or
other chemicals. When this water infiltrates into the bedrock it begins to gradually dissolve any
carbonate rocks.
4.1.2.11.3. Bedrock depth: For a void to cause a collapse of the overlying surface material it must
be close to the surface. Active karst areas have carbonate bedrock less than 50 feet below the
surface. Transitional karst areas have carbonate bedrock covered by material between 50 and
100 feet. In some instances, sinkholes can occur in these conditions as well. Covered karst areas
have more than 100 feet of overburden. Sinkholes are unlikely to develop in such deep
conditions.
4.1.2.11.4. Bedrock topography. Once water penetrates the soil, it will arrive at the bedrock layer.
Typically, the bedrock is much less permeable than the overlying unconsolidated soils which
promotes lateral water flow. The water will flow according to the topography of the bedrock
finding crevices and valleys that collect water until a penetration point can be found into the
bedrock.
4.1.2.11.5. Joints, fractures, and bedding planes: These features provide easy routes for water to
travel through the rock. As water moves through this network of joints, fractures and bedding
planes, chemical action of the acidic water dissolves the bedrock. Joints and fractures are often
oriented in parallel and perpendicular patterns. Because of this, voids and sinkholes also are often
aligned to follow these patterns.
4.1.2.11.6. Water table: Fluctuations in ground water levels can affect sinkhole activity. Abrupt
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
22
changes in ground water level can induce sinkholes. Ground water drawdown often increases
sinkhole activity.
4.1.2.11.7. Construction and development. Human development activities that add extra weight
and pressure to land surfaces by construction of new buildings and other infrastructure may
accelerate sinkhole formation. The alteration of surface and subsurface drainage flows due to
human development may also accelerate sinkhole formation by increasing the flow of water
through sinkhole drains. Water and sewer lines in karst areas are susceptible to damage from
sinkholes and other land subsidence. When water or sewer lines leak or break, the released water
may enter sinkhole systems and quickly enlarge voids, accelerating sinkhole formation.
4.1.2.12. Prevention
4.1.2.12.1. Avoidance The most effective prevention/mitigation measure against sinkhole
fatalities, injuries, infrastructure disruption and property loss are avoiding development and
certain human activities at sites prone to sinkholes. This is a preventive action. Avoidance may
be accomplished through evidence‐based zoning policies that utilize local area sinkhole hazard
assessments that trigger site‐specific sinkhole risk investigations when appropriate if
development or other uses are proposed at sites inside identified hazard areas. Zoning‐based
measures would be challenging in Hennepin County because much of the karst areas have already
been developed.
4.1.2.13. Mitigation
4.1.2.13.1. Education. Education of zoning officials, landowners need accurate local information
to make sound decision regarding their development and activities in sinkhole susceptible terrain.
These require detailed sinkhole hazard maps. HCEM completed its Landslide Hazard Atlas to assist
in mitigation, avoidance, and planning response efforts. The atlas was release by 2020.
4.1.2.14. Response
With the completion of the Landslide Hazard Atlas in 2020. Response effort follows five key
principles: engage partnerships, have a tiered response, have a scalable, flexible, and adaptable
operational capability, unify your effort, and be ready to act. Scene stabilization will be achieved
when the immediate threat to life‐safety and property damage at the scene have been stopped.
4.1.2.15. Recovery
The recovery process begins soon after the incident happens. The objective is to bring households
and communities back to normal activities post‐disaster. Relief can come from a variety of ways.
Public Assistance, Individual Assistance, Emergency Repair, or Permanent Repair.
4.1.2.16. References
Hennepin County landslide Hazard Atlas. (July 2020). https://www.hennepin.us/‐
/media/hennepinus/residents/emergencies/landslides/landslide‐atlas‐cover‐contents.pdf
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
23
4.1.3. Hazard Assessment: SOIL FROST
4.1.3.1. Definition.
Soil frost is caused when water, which is present as a
component of soil, freezes into pore ice. The depth to which
this freezing penetrates is called the deep frost. Some soils
are vulnerable to frost heaving, which is the vertical
displacement of the surface due to frost expansion or the
development of ice lenses. Melt collapse happens when the
ice lenses melt. These effects can damage roads and building
foundations and other infrastructure. Deep penetration of
frost can also have a devastating impact on critical buried
infrastructure, such as water and wastewater pipes. In
extreme cases, fire hydrants and fire sprinkler water supplies may freeze. Hard impervious frost layers in
the soil also can worsen springtime rain and snowmelt flooding by not allowing water to penetrate the
soil and increasing run‐off.
4.1.3.2. Range of magnitude
Unknown, pending conclusion of the Hennepin County Emergency Management‐sponsored soil frost
hazard assessment in 2020.
4.1.3.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
4.1.3.3.1. PRIMARY CONSEQUENCES
4.1.3.3.1.1. Water utilities: In Hennepin County, water service lines are typically buried
between 78 to 90 inches (198.1 to 228.6 centimeters) deep. This depth is usually
protecting these lines against freezing. When particularly deep frost is formed, however,
water service lines may freeze, cutting off water services to residences, businesses, and
government facilities. Bottled water delivery is often the response of choice while
awaiting water service restoration. Water service freezing not only stops the flow of
potable water to an address, it may also interrupt fire protection systems such as
sprinklers or standpipes. Water mains, which are buried deeper than service lines, are less
likely to freeze. If they freeze, then fire hydrant services also are interrupted. Thawing
frozen water lines is difficult and time consuming. It requires special equipment and
experience. Some methods may cause structural fires. In widespread instances of frozen
water lines, service may be cut for days to weeks. Without intervention, frozen water
service lines in Hennepin County would thaw by May. Service line freezing may be
prevented by keeping a pencil‐sized flow of cold tap‐water always moving through the
system. Prevention is usually done at the request of the local water utility.
4.1.3.3.1.2. Wastewater services: In general, municipal sewer lines have similar depth
requirements as water service lines to prevent frost damage or disruption. Sewer lines
typically have fewer freeze problems during deep frost events than water lines, however.
Rather than frost causing problems for municipal sewer systems, a bigger issue seems to
be impacts to household septic systems.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
24
4.1.3.3.1.3. Energy pipelines: Gas and other pipelines are vulnerable to the effects of
frost. According to data from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), 82% of cold weather failures of distribution pipelines in the US (1984 through
2014) were caused by frost heave.
4.1.3.3.1.4. Communications: Buried fiber optic cables are susceptible to impacts from
frost. This occurs when water that has infiltrated the fiber optic conduit freezes. The most
vulnerable areas where sites were cables were shallow or exposed near bridges. While
freezing has no impact on copper cables, fiber optic cables may be bent by the expansion
of the ice. Various levels of signal degradation may occur, including complete failure. As
a countermeasure, some communication companies have injected their conduit with
anti‐freeze compounds.
4.1.3.3.1.5. Structural damage: Frost heave of soils can cause significant damage to
structures including cracked foundations or slabs and other effects from ground
movement.
4.1.3.3.1.6. Transportation: Roads and highways are impacted frost action. Differential
frost heaves are creating blisters in pavement that leads to cracking and potholes. Frost
can block proper drainage and lead to additional problems. Road load‐bearing capacity is
affected by freeze‐thaw cycles.
4.1.3.3.2. SECONDARY CONSEQUENCES:
Frost induced breaks in gas or oil pipelines can cause fires or explosions.
4.1.3.4. Potential for Cascading Effects
4.1.3.4.1. Specific sites. Deep frost can impact buried infrastructure that carry water, wastewater,
energy or communications causing service interruption by freezing or by physical damage. Frost
heaving can also cause damage to buildings and other structures. These damages are highly
dependent on localized conditions leading to impacts that area variable from address to address.
Frost depth impacts may be widespread but spotty.
4.1.3.4.2. General areas. Deep frost can create a frozen and temporarily impervious layer of soil
across wide regions which limits infiltration of snow‐melt water and rainwater in springtime. This
additional runoff worsens springtime flooding across river basins and stream watersheds.
4.1.3.5. Geographic Scope of Hazard B1c
All areas of Hennepin County and the State of Minnesota are vulnerable to soil frost during winter months.
Minnesota and the adjacent state of North Dakota are the center of deep frost activity in the 48
contiguous United States. While frozen soils are routine in all parts of Minnesota, problems occur when
frost penetrates deeper than normal. The Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) Rule 1303.1600 places
construction frost depth in Hennepin County at 42 inches (106.7 centimeters).
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
25
4.1.3.6. Chronologic Patterns
Unknown, pending conclusion of the Hennepin County Emergency Management‐sponsored soil frost
hazard assessment in 2020.
4.1.3.7. Historical Data B1d
4.1.3.7.1. Comprehensive. Hennepin County Emergency Management (HCEM) has not yet
systematically investigated historical records of local frost depth. Precise frost measurements
using frost tubes or other sensors are unlikely to have been conducted anywhere in Hennepin
County prior to the HCEM program which started in 2015. The nearest historic soil frost records
are probably measurements taken at the University of Minnesota, Saint Paul campus. These St.
Paul records are for frost under sod. It is possible that written historical accounts of frost depth
and their effects might be found in records of municipal utility providers. These records, if
discovered, would probably be for frost under pavement which impacted water lines and other
utilities.
4.1.3.7.2. Winter of 2013‐2014. The coldest Hennepin County winter since 1978‐1979 occurred
in 2013‐2014 with a sustained three‐month cold snap. The mean temperature for the months of
December, January and February was 9.8F degrees at MSP airport. The normal for this time period
is 18.7F degrees. More snow fell than average during the period as well (57.2 inches three‐month
total). Most of it fell late in the period. Frost was pushed much deeper than average. Anecdotal
reports by public work crews working on frozen water service lines reported frost as deep as 7 to
8 feet in Plymouth. Twelve cities, not including Minneapolis, provided information regarding
service interruptions. In these cities were a total of 324 water freeze up incidents, mostly service
lines. In addition, 1 hydrant froze, 2 water mains, and 4 sewer lines also became frozen. The
longest outages were over one week. Residences, businesses, care facilities, and government
buildings were impacted. In several instances, cities had to distribute bottled water to affected
residences.
There have been no other naturally caused incidents that are within the scope of this plan.
4.1.3.7.3. Pre‐Historic Evidence:
Unknown. HCEM has not found any research regarding pre‐historic frost depth in Hennepin
County.
4.1.3.8. Future Trends B1e
Undetermined. Climate change is having a significant impact on Minnesota and Hennepin County. Forces
generated by climate change are sometimes at odds over the net effect experienced in this area during
any winter. For instance, there has been an overall warming trend in Minnesota winters, including a
shorter winter season and higher average temperatures. More recently, prolonged outbreaks of extreme
cold air have impacted Minnesota and Hennepin County. These include the winter of 2013‐2014 and the
winters of 2016‐2017 and 2017‐2018. These cold outbreaks appear to be related to warming in the Arctic
that has weakened the Polar Jet Stream. The weakened jet stream is less able to contain cold Arctic air in
high latitudes and block it from streaming south. Some scientists theorize that prolonged outbreaks of
extreme cold polar air may be a recurring feature of future winters in Minnesota. When coupled with low
or no‐snow cover conditions, outbreaks of extreme cold may push frost deeper into the soil.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
26
EVENT PROBABILITIES: Unknown. Further research is needed to determine trends and probabilities of
future deep soil frost events in Hennepin County.
4.1.3.9. Indications and Forecasting
Additional study is needed to develop deep soil frost event models and forecasts for Hennepin County.
Adequate weather forecasting already exists and would certainly be a major factor in any future soil frost
forecasts. Better data on the behavior of frost in local soils under various temperature, surface material,
soil moisture and snow cover conditions is required to develop models and forecasts. Hennepin‐West
Mesonet data will provide much of the needed information.
4.1.3.10. Detection & Warning
In 2015, following the disruptive winter of 2013‐2014 when hundreds of water service lines were frozen,
Hennepin County Emergency Management (HCEM) began to install a network of manually read frost tubes
at locations around Hennepin County. When possible, two frost tubes were installed at the same site.
One tube was for measuring frost depth under sod, and the other for frost depth under pavement because
of the significant differences between the two. Frost tubes are usually located near a Hennepin‐West
Mesonet sensor station so that weather factors can be compared to the frost depth at the site. The
measurements, taken at least weekly, can provide indications that the frost is pushing deeper than normal
and is beginning to threaten water and sewer services, fire protection capabilities, and other vital services.
When appropriate, HCEM will send out alerts to public works officials that frost may threaten their water
and sewer infrastructure.
4.1.3.11. Critical Values and Thresholds
4.1.3.11.1. Air temperature: Air temperatures below freezing (32F/0C) are required to initiate
soil frost formation. A freezing index based on degree‐days of freezing may be used to roughly
estimate frost depth potential in an area.
4.1.3.11.2. Pavement. Human‐made surfaces, such as concrete or asphalt roadways create ideal
conditions for exceptionally deep frost penetration into soil. The differences between frost depth
under paved roads and frost depth under natural sod is large enough to produce a few feet of
difference at the same site. Therefore, measurements should specify of they are taken under
pavement or under sod. Factors such as the thermal conductivity of pavement and the removal
of snow cover combine to push frost deep into the underlying soils. This is important because a
lot of buried infrastructure is underneath immediately adjacent to roadways, increasing their
vulnerability to frost.
4.1.3.11.3. Surface albedo: Surface albedo is the ratio of irradiance of solar energy reflected to
the irradiance of solar energy absorbed by a surface. Asphalt, dark soils, turf grasses and forests
have low albedo. Snow cover, sand, and winter prairie grasses have higher albedo. The albedo
of the primary surface is important because it influences the snow cover characteristics of the
site. Snow cover is a central factor is controlling frost depth.
4.1.3.11.4. Soil type: Different soil types freeze at different rates. Frost tends to penetrate less in
clay (heavy textured) soils and more deeply in silty or sandy (lighter textured) soils. Inorganic soils
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
27
with >3% by weight of grains finer than 0.02 millimeter in diameter (silts, silty sands, and clays)
form frost lenses more easily and have a very high susceptibility to frost heaves.
4.1.3.11.5. Moisture content: Soil moisture effects the initial freezing of soil because of the
increased heat capacity and thermal conductivity of the soil surface. The initial freezing point of
soil is usually delayed with increasing amounts of soil moisture. As winter progresses, the soils
that have started with greater amounts of water filling pore spaces experience greater overall
frost depths due to increased thermal conductivity since air is a less efficient conductor of heat
than water. Water tables within 10 feet of the surface are a contributing factor for frost heaves.
4.1.3.11.6. Snow cover: The insulating effect of snow cover is a key factor in slowing the
penetration of frost into the soil. Each foot of undisturbed snow cover typically reduces the depth
of soil freezing by an equal amount. Snow cover is a function of the amount of snowfall received
at a location, along with the type of surface material at that location. Darker colored surfaces also
tend to help accelerate snow melting and help remove the insulating effect of snow (see albedo).
Snow removal on paved surfaces helps to push frost deeper by not allowing insulating snow cover
to accumulate.
4.1.3.11.7. Vegetative cover: Like snow, vegetation acts as an insulator to slow frost penetration
into the soil. Loose grasses or leaves can form insulating air pockets that reduce the depth that
frost can penetrate.
4.1.3.11.8. Geographic location: In general, in Minnesota the average initial soil frost date is
earlier with higher latitudes and more westerly longitudes. More northerly latitudes have longer
overall frost seasons on average. In Minnesota the change in average freezing date is about 3.3
days per degree of latitude.
4.1.3.11.9. Infrastructure condition. In general, older buried infrastructure such as service lines,
pipes and conduits are in a more deteriorated condition than newer infrastructure and are more
susceptible to damage from deep frost.
4.1.3.12. Prevention
Unknown, pending conclusion of the Hennepin County Emergency Management assessment in 2020.
4.1.3.13. Mitigation
4.1.3.13.1. Frozen water lines. Water lines can be protected against deep frost by ensuring they
are buried to the correct depth. Lines which are already installed can resist freezing by ensuring a
constant flow of a small amount of water (pencil‐diameter stream from a faucet) flowing in from
the service line. Typically, water utilities will request that customers maintain running water at
addresses that have had freezing problems in the past.
4.1.3.13.2. Buildings, roads, and infrastructure. When it occurs, typical vertical ground
movement due to frost heaves and melt collapse is between 4 to 8 inches. Extreme movement
can be up to 24 inches. These ground movements are enough to cause significant damage to
human‐made structures. Various mitigation measures can protect structures against frost heave
and melt collapse. Buildings which are heated rarely experience frost heave problems because of
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
28
a portion of the heat is received by the surrounding soil which prevents ice lens formation and
heave action. For unheated structures, heaves can be prevented through keeping waters out of
freezing zone. Another mitigation method is to ensure soils surrounding structures are those less
susceptible to frost problems.
4.1.3.13.3. Distribution pipelines. Pipelines are susceptible to frost heave‐produced ground
movements. Pipe materials, joining methods, soil conditions and water drainage are all important
factors in prevention of damages. In areas susceptible to frost heave damage, pipeline materials
should shift away from cast iron and threaded steel pipe and be replaced by plastic of welded
steel. Other measures can be taken to reduce the chances of frost damage to pipelines. These
include drainage to reduce water in the soil and eliminate standing water over pipelines. Soil
conditions may also be modified to reduce susceptibility to ice lens formation.
4.1.3.13.4. Flooding. Deep frost penetration can worsen spring meltwater flooding by preventing
soil absorption of snow melt or rainwater. Flood control and management measures must
consider the potential for deep frost effects in spring flood scenarios.
4.1.3.14. Response
Unknown, pending conclusion of the Hennepin County Emergency Management assessment in 2024.
4.1.3.15. Recovery
Unknown, pending conclusion of the Hennepin County Emergency Management assessment in 2024.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
29
4.1.4. Hazard Assessment: VOLCANIC ASH
4.1.4.1. Definition.
Volcanic ash consists of tiny particles of jagged rock and
natural glass blasted into the air by a volcano. This ash
poses threats to human and animal health, aircraft
engines, electronics, machinery, electrical power
generation and telecommunications. Winds may carry
ash thousands of miles, impacting areas and people far
away from the volcano itself. Volcanic ash is not the
product of combustion, and thus is not like the light ashes
made by burning leaves, wood, or coal, for example.
Volcanic ash particles are hard rock fragments that do not
dissolve in water. Ash is extremely abrasive, mildly
corrosive and can conduct electricity when wet.
4.1.4.2. Range of magnitude
Unknown, pending conclusion of the Hennepin County Emergency Management assessment in 2020.
4.1.4.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
4.1.4.3.1. PRIMARY CONSEQUENCES
4.1.4.3.1.1. Aircraft. Aircraft in flight are particularly vulnerable to the effects of exposure
to volcanic ash. Often the ash cloud is invisible to the flight crew, and must be detected
by the odor of sulfur, or by a haze developing on the windscreen. The electrically charged
ash particles can interfere with navigational and flight instruments, and communications
equipment. The ash may clog the pitot‐static system that indicates airspeed and feeds air
to several vital flight instruments. Abrasion by the jagged particles can erode leading edge
surfaces, and quickly produce a haze on windscreens so that pilots are unable to see
through them. Turbine compressor blades in jet engines can wear quickly. Finally, the low
melting temperature of volcanic ash means that the particles liquefy in the ignition
chamber of jet engines, but quickly cool in the next engine stage and end up coating
engine parts with a glaze of volcanic glass. Engines have failed from ingesting volcanic
ash. Repair costs from encounters with ash can cost millions of dollars per aircraft.
4.1.4.3.1.2. Surface transportation. At the surface, ash fall could produce hazardous
driving conditions by cutting visibilities when at least 1 millimeter (1/32 inch) of ash
accumulates on roadways. Ash fall amounts of accumulation greater than 1 mm (1/32
Inch) also obscure markings on roadways, causing confusion among drivers in the low
visibility conditions.
4.1.4.3.1.3. Human health. The main health impact of volcanic ash to people (and
animals) are to the respiratory tract and to the eyes. Ash particles less than 100
nanometers in size produce upper airway irritation. Ash particles less than 10
nanometers in size can penetrate deep into the lung and worsen the conditions of those
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
30
with various pre‐existing lung diseases. Ashes with high crystalline silica content may also
increase risk for suture silicosis. Technical analysis is required to determine silica
component of the ash.
4.1.4.3.2. SECONDARY CONSEQUENCES:
Unknown at this distance from source volcanoes.
4.1.4.4. Potential for Cascading Effects
Volcanic ash is capable of various degrees of destruction, largely based on the distance it has traveled
from the volcano of origin. Ash falling to the surface in areas near the volcano is much coarser and heavier
than the ash that winds can carry for hundreds of thousands of miles from the eruption. Since the principle
volcanic ash producing threats are located at least 800 miles west of Hennepin County, the destructive
potential is restricted to the characteristics of ash that can be wind‐transported that far. The most
significant impacts at this distance involve the critical safety threat of aircraft flying through invisible high‐
altitude ash clouds. Sensitive electronic devices including computers, communications equipment,
medical devices, and other critical equipment can be damaged by the abrasive and electrically charged
particles. Finally, human and animal health impacts can occur because of the effect that the irritating
volcanic ash has on the respiratory system and on eyes.
4.1.4.5. Geographic Scope of Hazard B1c
Most volcanic ash is produced during explosive volcanic eruptions. Explosive volcanoes are found along
the boundaries of Earth’s converging tectonic plates that are converging, such as along the Pacific Rim,
sometimes called the Ring of Fire. Other volcanic activity is at mantle plumes, called ‘hot spots, which melt
through tectonic plates. The closest volcano to Hennepin County is the Yellowstone Caldera, located about
800 miles west, in northwest Wyoming. The belt of volcanoes in the Cascade Range are about 1300 miles
west of Hennepin County in eastern Washington State. Prevailing winds from the west set up Minnesota
as a potential recipient of ash from volcanic eruptions in the western United States, Canada, and Alaska.
4.1.4.6. Chronologic Patterns
Unknown, pending conclusion of the Hennepin County Emergency Management assessment in 2024.
4.1.4.7. Historical Data B1d
Several major eruptions have occurred in North America where ash clouds traveled great distances. These
include the Spurr Volcano, Alaska (27 June 1992); Mount Saint Helens, Washington (18 May 1980) and
the Novarupta Volcano, Alaska (06 June 1912). Ash from the Spurr volcano traveled over Minnesota (see
graphic at the beginning of this section) in September 1992.
Pre‐Historic Evidence
Some extremely large volcanic eruptions occurred in the geologically recent past in the Yellowstone
Super‐Volcano complex in northwestern Wyoming. The United States Geological Survey estimates an
average recurrence rate of explosive volcanic eruptions at Yellowstone to be between 600,000 and
800,000 years. The pervious explosive eruptions have been the Lava Creek Eruption, Yellowstone, WY
(630,000 years ago); the Mesa Falls Eruption, Yellowstone, WY (1.3 million years ago); and the
Huckleberry Ridge Eruption, Yellowstone, WY (2.1 million years ago). Massive ash falls were generated
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
31
by these eruptions.
There have been no other naturally caused incidents that are within the scope of this plan.
4.1.4.8. Future Trends B1e
There is no evidence that typical volcanic activity levels among the volcanoes that pose an ash fall threat
to Hennepin County are either increasing or decreasing. These volcanic events happen in geologic time
in which eruption recurrence rates of hundreds, thousands or even hundreds of thousands of years are
possible.
Event Probabilities: The United States Geological Survey (USGS) has estimated the activity level and
eruption recurrence rate of each of the volcanoes in the western United States, Canada, and Alaska.
4.1.4.9. Indications and Forecasting
Volcanic forecasting is the responsibility of the United States Geological Survey and its Volcano
Observatories. USGS scientists categorize volcanoes and estimate their explosive potential based on
evidence of past eruptions.
4.1.4.10. Detection & Warning
USGS scientists monitor precursor activity and are often able to issue alerts of impending eruptions
months or weeks prior to the event. Ash clouds are tracked by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration. The Washington Volcano Ash Advisory Center (WVAAC) is responsible to provide alert and
warning services for aviation safety. The Minneapolis Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) is served
by the WVAAC.
4.1.4.11. Critical Values and Thresholds
4.1.4.11.1. Diameter: Ash particles are less than 2 millimeters in diameter down to very extremely
small particles of less than 0.001 millimeter. Volcanic ash is lofted high into the atmosphere and
can be blown thousands of miles away from the volcano. Larger and heavier particles will fall to
Earth much more quickly than smaller and lighter particles which may remain aloft for weeks or
longer. Extremely small particles suspended in the air can be invisible to the human eye, yet
present hazards to aviation.
4.1.4.11.2. Density: Ash particles have variable degrees of density (pumice, 700‐1200 kg/m3;
glass, 2350‐2450 kg/m3; crystals, 2700‐3300 kg/m3; and rock particles, 2600‐3200 kg/m3). The
high‐density ash particles are hard (5 Mohs scale). Window glass and steel have a Mohs hardness
of 5.5, for example. Ash particles have sharp edges making them very abrasive.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
32
4.1.4.11.3. Weight: Fallen volcanic ash is heavy and poses
a risk to buildings close to the eruption, particularly those
with flat roofs. A dry layer of ash 4 inches thick weighs 120
to 200 pounds per square yard, and wet ash weight is
usually double the dry totals. Ash weight should not be a threat
to Minnesota structures.
4.1.4.11.4. Prevailing winds. Both east‐west zonal flow and
Alberta Clipper systems bring winds to Minnesota from
regions that host active volcanoes.
4.1.4.12. Prevention
Unknown, pending conclusion of the Hennepin County Emergency
Management assessment in 2024.
4.1.4.13. Mitigation
4.1.4.13.1. Avoidance. Avoidance of flight through ash clouds is vital to aviation safety. Ash cloud
alerts and warnings provide air route control centers the information they need to vector aircraft
away from ash clouds.
4.1.4.13.2. Personal protection. Personal protective equipment such as filtration masks and eye
protection from covered goggles are needed to avoid some of the health risks posed by volcanic
ash.
4.1.4.13.3. Barriers. Sealing off rooms that have sensitive electronics can be done with plastic
sheets and duct tape. Covering individual devices may also help protect them against ash.
4.1.4.14. Response
Unknown, pending conclusion of the Hennepin County Emergency Management assessment.
4.1.4.15. Recovery
Unknown, pending conclusion of the Hennepin County Emergency Management assessment.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
33
4.2. Hydrological Hazards
4.2.1. Hazard Assessment: FLOODING, URBAN
4.2.1.1. Definition
Urban flooding occurs when rain overwhelms drainage systems
and waterways and makes its way into the basements, backyards,
and streets of homes, businesses, and other properties. As land is
converted from fields or woodlands to roads or parking lots, it
loses its ability to absorb rainfall. Because of this, densely
populated areas are at a high risk for flash floods. The
construction of buildings, highways, driveways, and parking lots
increases runoff by reducing the amount of rain absorbed by the
ground.
4.2.1.2. Range of magnitude
The 10‐year average of recent flood damages is about $20 billion. However, some years have run as high
as $40 billion.
Deadliest Flash Flood (Dam Collapse): 1889, Johnstown Pennsylvania: 2,200 people died.
Deadliest torrential rain flood: July 31, 1976, Big Thompson Canyon, Colorado: 143 people died
Longest duration: 1993 61 days; The Great Midwest Flood
Greatest USD Damage: $12 Billion 1993; The Great Midwest Flood
4.2.1.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
There are several ways in which storm water can cause the flooding: overflow from rivers and streams,
sewage pipe backup into buildings, seepage through building wall and floors, and the accumulation of
storm water on property and in public rights‐of‐way. Sometimes, streams through cities and towns are
routed underground into storm drains. During heavy rain, the storm drains can become overwhelmed and
flood roads and buildings. Low spots, such as underpasses, underground parking garages, and
basements can become dangerous.
The economic, social, and environmental consequences of urban flooding can be considerable. Water
quality issues can arise from sewer overflow’s debris contamination, fertilizer runoff from agriculture
etc.… which affect public health with possible contaminated drinking water and water borne illnesses. The
cost of removal of soil from landslides, or sediment deposits from flooding can be high, as well as wildlife
habitat reconstruction as wildlife habitat can be ruined by wash out, water contaminates, oxygen loss, or
loss of access to food sources.
Chronically wet houses are linked to an increase in respiratory problems, and insurance rates and
deductibles may rise to compensate for repeated basement flooding claims. Industry experts estimate
that wet basements can lower property values by 10‐25 percent and are citied among the top reasons for
not purchasing a home. According to FEMA, almost 40 percent of small businesses never reopen their
doors following a flooding disaster. Between 2006–2010 the average commercial flood claim made to the
NFIP amounted to just over $85,000. Urban flooding also erodes streams and riverbeds and degrades the
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
34
quality of our drinking water sources and the health of our aquatic ecosystems.
4.2.1.4. Potential for Cascading Effects
Structures that encroach on the floodplain, such as bridges, can increase upstream urban flooding by
narrowing the width of the channel which can cause sediment and debris carried by floodwaters further
because the flow is occurring at a higher stage past the obstructions. This can cause channels to become
filled with sediment or become clogged with debris causing issues farther upstream from where the initial
flooding occurred.
Depending on the extent of the flooding, water quality becomes an issue because it becomes necessary
to treat contaminated runoff, but depending on the contaminants present this process can be very costly
especially when compared to its benefits. In addition to water quality in the runoff poses issues, if any
sewer or water treatment plants have been flooded, homes may now not have access to clean water or
working restrooms.
4.2.1.5. Geographic Scope of Hazard B1c
The extent of urban flooding in Hennepin County really depends on an extremely complex set of
interactions between the surface and sub‐surface drainage networks and features of the environment.
Urban flooding can be small in geographic scope as in just a few streets or neighborhoods with minor
flooding damage, to large areas of entire cities being under water.
4.2.1.6. Chronologic Patterns
Urban flooding in Hennepin County typically occurs in the spring and summer months associated with
thunderstorms. Springtime urban flooding can come from both snowfall melt and runoff during the spring,
a spring thunderstorm that comes before the ground has had time to that completely preventing
infiltration, or just a normal thunderstorm (or multiple thunderstorms within a smaller period) with
excessive rainfall rates.
4.2.1.7. Historical Data B1d
Floods have been documented all the way back to 1776 in Minnesota. However official American records
don’t begin until 1873. As mentioned in river flooding, of the 24 State of Minnesota Flood Declarations,
Hennepin County has been included in six, with all having urban flooding issues with road and bridge
closures. There have been no other naturally caused incidents that are within the scope of this plan.
1965 Flooding (DR‐188)
1969 Flooding (DR‐255)
1997 Severe Flooding, High Winds, Severe Storms (DR‐1175)
2001 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes (DR‐1370)
2010 Flooding (DR‐3310)
2014 Severe Storms, Straight‐Line Winds, Flooding, Landslides and Mudslides (DR‐4182)
2016 Severe Storms & Flooding (DR‐4290)
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
35
4.2.1.8. Future Trends B1e
Urban flooding is a naturally occurring hazard that affects cities and regions around the world, and is
expected to become even more problematic in the future. Damages from floods are also increasing as are
the number of people who are affected by them.
Human‐induced land cover change and climate change are important factors in urban flooding. Rapid
population growth and increasing migration from rural areas to cities lead to intense urbanization, which
often increases flood risk. According to recent studies, the urban heat island effect and aerosol
composition can alter the climate mechanism, which plays an important role in the storm evolution of
urbanized regions. Global warming, the other main cause of hydrologic regime change, can induce the
acceleration of the water cycle, which can consequently affect the frequency and intensity of future storm
events. Research has shown that in the future we may not necessarily see more rainfall, but more rainfall
on less days. That is to say that if the monthly average total rainfall is four inches over eight different days,
we would now see that four inches come on three or four days. So same amount of rain, just coming more
at one time.
4.2.1.9. Indications and Forecasting
Currently, the operational method for forecasting flash floods at the National Weather service is to utilize
the Flash Flood Monitoring and Prediction software package to compare rainfall estimates with flood‐
induced rainfall accumulation thresholds, known as flash flood guidance values. The success of this
guidance depends on both accuracy of radar‐estimated rainfall rates and the flash‐flood guidance values.
The National Weather Service Weather Forecast Offices issues all flash‐flood advisories, watches, and
warnings for their respective county warning areas. The primary indicator used by forecasters to predict
onset of flash flooding, is when radar‐based rainfall estimates exceed flash flood guidance values over f 1,
3, or 6 hours. Flash‐flood guidance is defined as the threshold rainfall required to initiate flooding on small
streams that respond to rainfall within a few hours.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
36
4.2.1.10. Detection & Warning
The National Weather Service issues flash flood advisories, watches, and warnings.
Flood Advisory: Thunderstorms have produced heavy rainfall that may result in ponding of water
on roadways and in low‐lying areas, as well as rises in small stream levels, none of which pose an
immediate threat to life and property.
Flash Flood Watch: Atmospheric and hydrologic conditions are favorable for short duration flash
flooding and/or dam break is possible.
Flash Flood Warning: Excessive rainfall producing thunderstorms have developed, lead to short
duration flash flooding. A warning may also be issued if a dam break has occurred.
4.2.1.11. Critical Values and Thresholds
Using thresholds for flooding indicators can be intellectual traps for the uneducated and what constitutes
an important threshold in one situation may be unimportant in another. In broad terms, moderately high
rainfall rates begin at about 1 inch per hour, and moderately long durations begin at about one hour, but
these should be considered only as the crudest of guidelines.
Conversation with the local National Weather Service in Chanhassen, MN has concluded that local
forecasters tend to look at the rainfall rate and return period more than any amount threshold. It also
depends on antecedent conditions. Consensus between the hydrologist and an operation warning
forecaster is they look for model outputs to show them at least a 10‐year event as a starting point to get
flash flooding. In addition, using one particular source, they use a return period for precipitation to have
at least a 20–50‐year event to get flash urban flooding in the Twin Cities Metro area.
4.2.1.12. Prevention
To improve water management and protect the sewage system from damage, cities can revamp their
underground pipe and drainage systems by separating rainwater from the sewage system. The separation
enables the wastewater treatment plant to function properly, without it being overburdened by large
quantities of storm water.
Other more obvious methods are to keep sewer systems clean of clog up with waste, debris, sediment,
tree roots and leaves.
4.2.1.13. Mitigation
Areas that have been identified as flood prone areas can be turned into parks, or playgrounds, buildings
and bridges can be lifted, floodwalls and levees, drainage systems, permeable pavement, soil
amendments, and reducing impermeable surfaces. Reducing impervious surfaces could include the
addition of green roofs, rain gardens, grass paver parking lots, or infiltration trenches.
Other mitigation strategies include developing a floodplain management plan, form partnerships to
support floodplain management, limit or restrict development in floodplain areas, adopt and enforce
building codes and development standards, improve storm water management planning, adopt policies
to reduce storm water runoff, and improve the flood risk assessment.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
37
4.2.1.14. Response
One of the most important things to be done during the initial response is to make sure that people are
safe. If their homes have been damages and are unlivable, finding a place for them to stay is among one
of the top priorities. Next is the access to places if roads are washed out or still underwater. One
complicated factor with flood disasters, is sometimes you do not know how bad the damage is until the
water recedes, which can take time and slow the response. Another important part of response is to make
sure water supply is available as quick as possible if there has been any contamination. The role of
Hennepin County Emergency Management is to coordinate resources that our municipalities may need
to accomplish all response needs.
4.2.1.15. Recovery
As mentioned in river flooding, recovery from floods can take weeks, to months, to years. Urban flooding
is unlike quick disasters (e.g., tornadoes) where you can see the damage immediately, sometimes with
urban flooding you must wait for the flood waters to recede to find out what damage there is to recover
from. A lot of the time, the longer the water level stays too high, the more consequences are introduced
that you must then recover from.
4.2.1.16. References
Bumsted, J. M. 1997. Floods of the Centuries. Winnipeg: Great Plains Publications.
Chang, Heejun, and Jon Franczyk. 2008. 'Climate Change, Land‐Use Change, and Floods: Toward an
Integrated Assessment'. Geography Compass 2 (5): 1549‐1579. doi:10.1111/j.1749‐
8198.2008.00136.x.
Dartmouth.edu. 2015. 'Dartmouth Flood Observatory'. http://www.dartmouth.edu/~floods/Archives/.
Doswell, Charles A., Harold E. Brooks, and Robert A. Maddox. 1996. 'Flash Flood Forecasting: An
Ingredients‐Based Methodology'. Wea. Forecasting 11 (4): 560‐581. doi:10.1175/1520‐
0434(1996)011<0560:fffaib>2.0.co;2.
Gourley, Jonathan J., Jessica M. Erlingis, Yang Hong, and Ernest B. Wells. 2012. 'Evaluation of Tools Used
For Monitoring and Forecasting Flash Floods in the United States'. Wea. Forecasting 27 (1): 158‐
173. doi:10.1175/waf‐d‐10‐05043.1.
Greene, Scott, Yang Hong, Mark Meo, Baxter Vieux, Jonathan Looper, Zhanming Wan, and Amy Goodin.
2015. Urban Flooding and Climate Change. EBook. 1st ed.
http://eos.ou.edu/hazards/urbanflooding/files/Urban_Flooding_Brochure.pdf.
Huntington, Thomas G. 2006. 'Evidence for Intensification of the Global Water Cycle: Review and
Synthesis'. Journal of Hydrology 319 (1‐4): 83‐95. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.003.
Jung, I.‐W., H. Chang, and H. Moradkhani. 2011. 'Quantifying Uncertainty in Urban Flooding Analysis
Considering Hydro‐Climatic Projection and Urban Development Effects'. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15
(2): 617‐633. doi:10.5194/hess‐15‐617‐2011.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
38
Killen, Brian. 2015. 'Urban Flooding Impacts and Solutions'. In Association of State Floodplain Managers
Conference.
Konrad, C. P. 2014. 'Effects of Urban Development on Floods'. USGS. http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs07603/.
Lana, Juan. 2011. 'The Great Flood Of 1993'. Master, American Military University System.
NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory. 2015. 'Flood Basics'.
http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/education/svrwx101/floods/.
Ntelekos, Alexandros A., James A. Smith, Leo Donner, Jerome D. Fast, William I. Gustafson, Elaine G.
Chapman, and Witold F. Krajewski. 2009. 'The Effects of Aerosols on Intense Convective
Precipitation in the Northeastern United States'. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological
Society 135 (643): 1367‐1391. doi:10.1002/qj.476.
Oki, Taikan, and Shinjiro Kanae. 2006. 'Global Hydrological Cycles and World Water Resources'. Science
313 (5790): 1068‐1072. doi:10.1126/science.1128845.
Sene, Kevin. 2013. Flash Floods. Dordrecht: Springer.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1998. Ohio River Valley Flood Of March 1997. Silver Spring, MD.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
39
4.2.2. Hazard Assessment: FLOODING, RIVER
4.2.2.1. Definition
River flooding occurs when river levels rise and overflow
their banks or the edges of their main channel and inundate
areas that are normally dry. River flooding can occur from
both high precipitation weather events and/or ice/snow
melt in the spring. The amount of flooding is usually a
function of the amount of precipitation in an area, the
amount of time it takes for rainfall to accumulate, previous
saturation of local soils, and the terrain around the river
system, dam failures, rapid snowmelt, and ice jams. Over
750 of Presidential Disaster Declarations result from
flooding.
River flooding is classified as Action, Minor, Moderate, or Major based on water height and impacts along
the river that have been coordinated with the National Weather Service. Action means the National
Weather Service, or a customer/partner, needs to take mitigation action in preparation for potential river
flooding. Minor river flooding means that low‐lying areas adjacent to the stream or river, mainly rural
areas and farmland and secondary roadways near the river flood. Moderate flooding means water levels
rise high enough to impact homes and businesses near the river and some evacuations may be needed.
Larger roads and highways may also be impacted. Major flooding means that extensive rural and/or urban
flooding is expected. Towns may become isolated and major traffic routes may be flooded.
4.2.2.2. Range of Magnitude
United States
o Most destructive flood: Mississippi River, 1927 (500 killed; 600,000 homeless)
o Costliest Flood: Great Mississippi & Missouri River Flood of 1993 ($30.2 billion)
Minnesota
o Most destructive flood: 1997 Red River Flood (58 of 87 counties in Minnesota Federally
Declared Disasters)
o MN costliest flood: 1997 Red River Flood ($2 billion)
4.2.2.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
River flooding can affect both people and property. Losses in both wildlife and livestock can also occur,
which can drastically affect the economy. In addition, road washouts, power and water outages can also
be common with river flooding.
4.2.2.4. Potential for Cascading Effects
There is high potential for cascading consequences from river flooding. Depending on severity, there could
be public health sanitation problems, landslides, food spoilage and food production shortages from
farmland being underwater.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
40
4.2.2.5. Geographic Scope of Hazard B1c
River flooding occurs across all of Hennepin County. Three major rivers create Hennepin County borders
on the northwest, south and east side. Those include the Minnesota, Crow, and Mississippi Rivers. In
addition, several creeks and streams across Hennepin County have a history of flooding, which have
caused damage to property. Some of those include the Minnehaha Creek, and Nine Mile Creek. All these
rivers and creeks are susceptible to early spring snow‐melt flooding as well as summer and fall storm
seasons.
4.2.2.6. Chronologic Patterns
River flooding can occur because of both snowmelt and high precipitation events which makes the flood
season start from early spring to early winter. It of course depends on how warm we start to get in the
spring how early, to when we start to get below freezing in the winter. For example, if there is more than
average snowfall/snow depth tied together a spike in temperatures during the early spring, we are melting
snow without having a fully thawed out ground, making soil impervious, which increases the runoff and
subsequently increasing chances for flooding.
4.2.2.7. Historical Data/Previous Occurrence B1d
Floods have been documented all the way back to 1776 in Minnesota. However official American records
don’t begin until 1873. Minnesota has seen twenty‐four Disaster Declarations due to flooding, six of which
have been in Hennepin County. There have been no other naturally occurring incidents that are within
the scope of this plan.
1965 Flooding (DR‐188)
The Mississippi River at Fridley crested at 20 ft. on April 17th, 1965, which was 4 ft. over flood
stage.
On April 15, the Minnesota River at Savage crested at 719.40 ft., over 17 ft. above flood stage (702
ft.), and 7 ft. above major flood stage (712 ft.). A day later April 16th, the Mississippi river at St
Paul crested at 26.01 ft., 12 ft. above flood stage (14 ft.) and 9 ft. above major flood stage (17 ft.).
The St Croix River at Stillwater followed suit with a record crest of 94.10 ft. on April 18, is 7 ft.
above flood stage (87 ft.) and 5 ft. above major flood stage (89 ft.).
1969 Flooding (DR‐255)
The Mississippi River at Fridley crested at 17.50 ft. on April 14, 1969, which was 1.5 ft. over flood
stage.
Crow River crested at 16.5 ft. on April 11, 1969, which is 6.5 ft. over flood stage.
1997 Severe Flooding, High Winds, Severe Storms (DR‐1175)
The Mississippi River at Fridley crested at 17.10 ft. on April 10, 1997, which is 1.1 ft. over flood
stage.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
41
Crow River reached flood stage of 10 feet on 4/4/97 at Rockford which is the river monitoring
point. The river crested at 14.4 feet on 4/9/97 which was the fifth highest crest ever recorded.
The river subsided to below flood stage on 4/20/97. Substantial flooding occurred at a golf course
in the town of St. Michael. (NCDC Storm Events)
2001 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes (DR‐1370)
The Mississippi River at Fridley crested twice. First at 16.60 ft. on April 15, 2001, and second at
16.40 ft. on April 28th, 2001, 0.6 and 0.4 ft. over flood stage respectively.
Four factors contributed to the flooding of 2001: significant autumn precipitation, heavy winter
snowfall, less than ideal snowmelt scenario, and record‐breaking April precipitation
(http://climate.umn.edu/doc/journal/flood_2001/flood_2001.htm). April 16th the Crow River at
Rockford, MN crested at 14.5 feet with a peak discharge at 13,100 ft3/s which is 4.5 ft. over flood
stage.
2010 Flooding (DR‐3310)
Crow River at Rockford reached 13.99 ft. on March 22, 2010, which was 3.99 ft. over flood stage.
2014 Severe Storms, Straight‐Line Winds, Flooding, Landslides and Mudslides (DR‐4182)
Crow River at Rockford crested at 15.08 ft. on June 25th, 2014, which was 5.08 over flood stage.
4.2.2.8. Future Trends B1e
Changes in river flooding can be caused by changes in atmospheric conditions, land use/land cover, and
water management. These changes can occur in tandem, or individually which makes it difficult to
determine which factor acts as the driving force of changes in river flooding behavior. However, long‐term
data does show and increase in flooding in the norther half of the eastern prairies and parts of the
Midwest. Even with data showing days with heavy precipitation increasing, this trend does not strongly
relate to changes, or increases, in river flooding. One conclusion for this is the mismatch of seasons with
which the high precipitation events occur and most likely season for flooding in most river basins within
our region8. For example, the northern Great Plains typically sees peak river flooding during spring
snowmelt, however, generally the heaviest daily rainfall events occur during the summer.
When considering the issue of future river flood hazard changes, it is important to recognize that urban
and rural land‐use impacts, and water management have significant influence on river flood behavior.
While precipitation and flooding have been increasing in the northern half of the eastern prairies, general
circulation models do not show this as an area expected to have a substantial increase in runoff in the
twentieth‐century or the twenty‐first century forecast.
4.2.2.9. Indications and Forecasting
River Flooding typically occurs hours to days after a high precipitation event. Warnings for river floods can
often provide much more lead‐time that those for flash flooding.
4.2.2.10. Detection & Warning
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
42
The National Weather Service issues flood advisories, watches and warnings16.
Flood Advisory: Thunderstorms have produced heavy rainfall that may result in ponding of water
on roadways and in low‐lying areas, as well as rises in small stream levels, none of which pose an
immediate threat to life and property.
Flood Watch: Atmospheric and Hydrologic conditions are favorable for long duration areal or river
flooding.
Flood Warning: Long duration areal or river flooding is occurring or is imminent, which may result
from excessive rainfall, rapid snow met, ice jams on rivers or other similar causes.
4.2.2.11. Critical Values and Thresholds
The National Weather Service uses flood categories to communicate/categorize the severity of flood
impacts in the corresponding river/stream reach. The severity of flooding at a given stage is not necessarily
the same at all locations along a river reach due to varying channel/bank characteristics or presence of
levees on portions of the reach. Therefore, the upper and lower stages for a given flood category are
usually associated with water levels corresponding to the most significant flood impacts somewhere in
the reach.
The flood categories used by the National Weather Service are:
Minor Flooding ‐ minimal or no property damage, but possibly some public threat (e.g.,
inundation of roads).
Moderate Flooding ‐ some inundation of structures and roads near stream. Some evacuations of
people and/or transfer of property to higher elevations.
Major Flooding ‐ extensive inundation of structures and roads. Significant evacuations of people
and/or transfer of property to higher elevations.
Record Flooding ‐ flooding which equals or exceeds the highest stage or discharge observed at a
given site during the period of record. The highest stage on record is not necessarily above the
other three flood categories, it may be within any of them or even less than the lowest,
particularly if the period of record is short (e.g., a few years). It is also important to note that
minor, moderate, major flood categories do not necessarily exist for all forecast points. For
example, a location with a permanent levee may begin to experience impacts at moderate
flooding level.
4.2.2.12. Prevention
Most prevention methods of river flooding fall under mitigation actions. See Mitigation below for
methods of prevention.
4.2.2.13. Mitigation
There are many ways to mitigate flooding hazards. Two techniques are hard and soft engineering
mitigation techniques. Hard engineering techniques include building dams, levees, wing dykes, and
diversion spillways. Soft engineering techniques include floodplain zoning, afforestation, wet plain
restoration, river restoration, and removal of properties in flood prone areas.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
43
4.2.2.14. Response
Hennepin County Emergency Management Capabilities
Situation monitoring Station (SMS)
Immediate Impact Reconnaissance Teams
Hennepin County Emergency Operations Plan
4.2.2.15. Recovery
Recovery from floods can take weeks to months to years. One complicating factor when it comes to river
flooding, is unlike quick disasters (e.g., tornadoes) where you can see the damage immediately, river
flooding you must wait for the floodwaters to recede to find out what damage there is to recover from. A
lot of the time, the longer the water level stays too high, the more consequences are introduced that you
must then recover from.
4.2.2.16. References
Bumsted, J. M. 1997. Floods of the Centuries. Winnipeg: Great Plains Publications.
Environmental Science Services Administration. 1969. ESSA and Operation Foresight. Washington D. C.:
U.S. Department of Commerce.
FEMA. 2015. "Data Visualization: Summary of Disaster Declarations and Grants | FEMA.Gov". Fema.Gov.
http://www.fema.gov/data‐visualization‐summary‐disaster‐declarations‐and‐grants.
Jackson, Alex. 2015. "Flood Management". Geographyas.Info. https://geographyas.info/rivers/flood‐
management/.
National Weather Service. 2015. "NWS Flood Related Hazards". Floodsafety.Noaa.Gov.
http://www.floodsafety.noaa.gov/hazards.shtml.
National Weather Service. 2012. Hydrologic Services Program NWSPD 10‐9. Department of Commerce.
Peterson, Thomas C., Richard R. Heim, Robert Hirsch, Dale P. Kaiser, Harold Brooks, Noah S.
Diffenbaugh, and Randall M. Dole et al. 2013. "Monitoring and Understanding Changes in Heat
Waves, Cold Waves, Floods, and Droughts in the United States: State of Knowledge". Bull. Amer.
Meteor. Soc. 94 (6): 821‐834. doi:10.1175/bams‐d‐12‐00066.1.
U. S. Geological Survey. 2001. Flooding in the Mississippi River Basin in Minnesota. U.S. Geological
Survey.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
44
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
45
4.3. Meteorological Hazards
4.3.1. Hazard Assessment: CLIMATE CHANGE
4.3.1.1. Definition
Climate change is a significant and ongoing change in
the long‐term statistical and/or spatial behavior of
weather patterns and variables, as global temperatures
rise in response to the intensified combustion of fossil
fuels and deforestation, both of which increase
concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide and
other greenhouse gases. The increasing global
temperatures have, in turn, added additional moisture
to the air through higher evaporations rates, and modified patterns of global atmospheric circulation.
Climatic Background
Hennepin County has a highly variable, continental‐type climate with seasonal extremes and a wide range
of weather hazards. Its position near the center of the continent, and halfway between the Equator and
North Pole, subjects it to a wide variety of air mass types throughout the year. During a single year,
Hennepin County will experience heavy snow, frigid wind chills, howling winds, intense thunderstorms,
torrential rains, and heat waves, as well as dozens of bright and sunny days.
In addition to extreme variations between our seasons, Hennepin County’s climate also can include large
variations from one year to the next, or even at decadal and multi‐decadal scales. The extremely dry years
of 1910, 1936, 1976, and 1988 each were followed within 1‐3 years by extremely wet ones. In a six‐year
span of the 2010s, Hennepin County experienced its warmest November through March on record in
2011‐12, its 5th coldest on record in 2013‐14, and its 4th warmest on record in 2015‐16.
Climate Change in Hennepin County
In Hennepin County, climate change has meant distinct, measurable trends towards warmer, wetter, and
more humid conditions on average, even as occasional swings towards dry or cold conditions continue to
be part of the climate. As shown in TABLE 4.3.1A, county‐averaged temperature and precipitation have
increased by 3.1° F and 3.0 inches, respectively since 1895. The warmest year, winter, and spring, and the
wettest summer and winter, have all occurred since the year 2000. Additionally, nine of the county’s 10
warmest years and seven of the 10 wettest years from 1895 through 2023 occurred after 1970, with the
vast majority occurring after 1990.
The county’s most extreme precipitation events also occurred during this period, with major flash‐flooding
in 1977, 1987, 1997, 2014, and 2016. Record‐level humidity extremes occurred more frequently from
2000 through 2023 than at any other time in 121 years of record.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
46
TABLE 4.3.1A Annual, spring, summer, fall, and winter temperature and precipitation averaged over
Hennepin County showing the 1991‐2020 average values, the total change from 1895‐2023, the
maximum values and the minimum values. Bold indicates occurrence since the year 2000. Data from
Minnesota DNR Climate Trends Tool (https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/ewr/climatetrends/)
Season
Average Temperature (° F) Total Precipitation (inches)
Average,
1991‐2020
Change,
1895‐
2023
Max
(year)
Min
(year)
Average,
1991‐2020
Change,
1895‐
2023
Max
(year)
Min
(year)
Annual
45.15 +3.1 48.98
(2012)
38.83
(1917)
31.88 +3.0 41.91
(1991)
12.53
(1910)
Spring
(Mar‐
May)
45.11 +2.6 52.65
(2012)
37.38
(1907)
8.66 +1.7 14.54
(1938)
2.37
(1910)
Summer
(Jun‐
Aug)
70.02 +1.7 74.57
(1988)
64.43
(1915)
13.11 +1.7 22.76
(2002)
4.75
(1936)
Fall
(Sep‐
Nov)
47.72 +2.6 52.74
(1963)
38.62
(1896)
7.55 ‐0.1 15.54
(1900)
1.42
(1952)
Winter
(Dec‐
Feb)
17.68 +5.0 25.39
(2001‐
02)
4.42
(1935‐
36)
2.57 ‐0.3 5.65
(2022‐
23)
0.59
(1958‐
59)
As shown in GRAPHIC 4.3.1A, confidence about the extent to which climate change has influenced
changes in the frequency or magnitude of given weather hazards in Minnesota varies considerably. Some
hazards appear strongly linked to climatic change while other hazards have yet to show any influence at
all. In general, the most notable associations include cold weather extremes becoming less severe or less
frequent, and extremes of precipitation becoming more severe or more frequent. Humid heat waves have
a moderately‐strong and increasing association with climate change, because of increases in humidity.
Other common hazards, including tornadoes, hail, and strong thunderstorm winds; drought; and summer
high temperature extremes, show little or no long‐term change in frequency or magnitude yet.
GRAPHIC 4.3.1A Confidence that climate change has already impacted common Hennepin County
weather/climate hazards through 2023. Provided upon request by Minnesota State Climatology Office.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
47
Warming in Hennepin County
County‐averaged statistic indicate Hennepin County has warmed a total of 3.1° F since 1895, or at an
average rate of +0.24° F per decade, which exceeds global and national averages. As illustrated in
GRAPHIC 4.3.1B, using the same data source, nine of the 10 warmest years on record—including the
warmest year in 2012—have occurred since 1990.
GRAPHIC 4.3.1B Annual temperature, averaged over Hennepin County, 1895‐2023, with the trendline
showing average rate of change over the period of record. Table at right shows ten warmest years. Data
from Minnesota DNR Climate Trends Tool (https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/ewr/climatetrends/).
Although temperatures are increasing in every season, winter (December through February) has warmed
approximately three times faster than summer (June through August), with a total warming of 5.0° F
versus 1.7° F. Daily overnight low temperatures have also increased about three times faster than daily
high temperatures. The most extreme differences in warming rates are between winter low
temperatures, which have increased by an average of 6.4° F since 1895, and summer high temperatures,
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
48
which have shown very slight decreases over that same period.
Winter and nighttime‐driven warming is consistent across the planet and is especially pronounced in areas
with long and severe winters—when surface heat that would normally escape into space is trapped by
the growing concentration of greenhouse gases. This warming has reduced the availability and depth of
cold air masses, such that cold air outbreaks are not as frequent or severe as they were historically, while
mild winter air masses are now more frequent and often warmer than was typical historically. For
instance, GRAPHIC 4.3.1C shows that daily minimum temperatures of ‐20° F or lower are now less
common in the Twin Cities than in any other period back to 1873.
GRAPHIC 4.3.1C Frequency of ‐20° F low temperatures in the Twin Cities. Data source: Applied Climate
Information System, accessed via https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/historical/acis_stn_meta.html.
Across Minnesota and the region, this warming has led to far more warm records than cold records being
set. Since the year 2000, the Twin Cities airport has set 6.7 times more records for highest daily maximum
and highest daily minimum temperature, than for lowest daily minimum and lowest daily maximum
temperature (shown in GRAPHIC 4.3.1D). These recent years represent just 16% of the station history but
account for 33% of the warm records and only 5% of the cold records.
GRAPHIC 4.3.1D Number and types of daily temperature records set from 2000 through 2023 at the
long‐term Twin Cities observing site, currently at the MSP airport. Source: Threaded Extremes
(https://threadex.rcc‐acis.org/)
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
18
7
3
18
7
9
18
8
5
18
9
1
18
9
7
19
0
3
19
0
9
19
1
5
19
2
1
19
2
7
19
3
3
19
3
9
19
4
5
19
5
1
19
5
7
19
6
3
19
6
9
19
7
5
19
8
1
19
8
7
19
9
3
19
9
9
20
0
5
20
1
1
20
1
7
20
2
3
Number of Daily Minimum Temperatures ‐20° F or Lower
Twin Cities, 1873‐2023
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
49
As noted previously, summer temperatures are increasing in Hennepin County, albeit more slowly than
winter temperatures. The average summer daily maximum or high temperature (June through August)
shows a very slight decrease over time. This observation is matched by the fact that the count of daytime
high temperatures reaching or exceeding 90° F in the Twin Cities has shown no trend since peaking in the
1930s. Meanwhile, average summer minimum or low temperatures show have increased by 3.7° F since
1895, which exceeds the rate of annual average warming for the county. Therefore, the summer warming
experienced in the county so far is attributable to warmer nights, which result in higher minimum
temperatures. GRAPHIC 4.3.1E shows summer temperature behavior over in the Twin Cities and
Hennepin County.
GRAPHIC 4.3.1E Number of 90° F days per year in the Twin Cities, 1873‐2023, along with June through
August (summer) average maximum and minimum temperatures for Hennepin County, 1895‐2023. Data
for Twin Cities accessed via https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/historical/acis_stn_meta.html, and
for Hennepin County from https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/ewr/climatetrends/.
9
27
105
136
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120
135
150
Lowest Daily
Minimum
Lowest Daily
Maximum ("cold
highs")
Highest Daily
Maximum
Highest Daily
Minimum ("warm
lows")
Twin Cities Daily Temperature Records Set from 2000‐2023
(Period of Record 1873‐2023)
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
50
Although summertime high temperatures have not increased over the long‐term, there have been signs
that high‐humidity heat waves are now more common and severe than they were historically (see
Humidity sub‐section below)
Increased Precipitation
On a county‐averaged basis, precipitation in Hennepin County has increased by an average of 3 inches, or
just under 10% since 1895, with virtually all that increase occurring since 1970. As shown in GRAPHIC
4.3.1F, using the same data source, five of the 10 wettest years on record, including each of the top‐3 and
four of the top‐5, have occurred since 1990. Only one year since 1990 has made the list of 10 driest years
(2022 was 10th driest, not shown). The long‐term Twin Cities climate station, currently at the International
Airport, set all‐time annual precipitation records in 2016, and then again in 2019, and finished the 2010s
as the wettest decade on record since the 1870s.
Although at least one month from each season has increasing precipitation, the strongest seasonal
increases have been in spring and summer, whereas average precipitation during fall and winter hardly
changed or decreased slightly from 1895 through 2023. Please refer to TABLE 4.3.1A, at the beginning of
this chapter, for detailed information about seasonal precipitation in Hennepin County
52
56
60
64
68
72
76
80
84
88
0
10
20
30
40
50
18
7
3
18
7
9
18
8
5
18
9
1
18
9
7
19
0
3
19
0
9
19
1
5
19
2
1
19
2
7
19
3
3
19
3
9
19
4
5
19
5
1
19
5
7
19
6
3
19
6
9
19
7
5
19
8
1
19
8
7
19
9
3
19
9
9
20
0
5
20
1
1
20
1
7
20
2
3
Te
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(°
F
)
Nu
m
b
e
r
90
F
Da
y
s
90‐Degree Days in the Twin Cities, and Summer Average High
and Low Temperatures for Hennepin County
Number 90+ F Highs Average Summer Daily High
Average Summer Daily Low High Temp Trendline
Low Temp Trendline
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
51
GRAPHIC 4.3.1F Annual precipitation, averaged over Hennepin County, 1895‐2023, with the trendline
showing average rate of change over the period of record. Table at right shows ten warmest years. Data
from Minnesota DNR Climate Trends Tool (https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/ewr/climatetrends/).
Daily and multi‐day extremes of rain have become more common in recent decades as well. Rainfall
records for the Twin Cities go back to 1871, but the period since 1970 dominates the heavy rain statistics,
with four of the top‐six daily rainfall totals occurring during that period, including the two largest events
on record—which led to significant and even catastrophic flooding.
As shown in GRAPHIC 4.3.1G, annual precipitation and the number of days with heavy rain, or at least
one inch of precipitation, both increased during the most recent several decades.
Seasonal snowfall also has increased and remained historically high during the period of strong winter
warming and the great climatic change in Hennepin County. With snowfall records back to 1884‐85, each
of the top three, tour of the top five, and 14 of the 20 snowiest seasons on record occurred after 1980.
Most recently, the 2022‐23 winter was third snowiest on record in the Twin Cities, with 90.3 inches. The
period 1980‐2023 represents just 32% of the station history of the Twin Cities, but accounts for 70% of
the top‐20 seasonal snowfall totals.
Daily and multi‐day snowfall extremes are also more common in recent decades. Eight of the 10 largest
daily snowfalls on record occurred after 1980, including each of the top four. GRAPHIC 4.3.1H shows how
days with heavy snow and seasonal snowfall have hit historical high marks only recently.
GRAPHIC 4.3.1G (top) Annual precipitation and average number of days receiving at least one inch of
precipitation, by decade in the Twin Cities. GRAPHIC 4.3.1H (bottom) Seasonal snowfall and average
number of days with at least 4 inches of snow. Data source, both graphics: Applied Climate Information
System, accessed via https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/historical/acis_stn_meta.html.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
52
Even though periods of intense growing season drought have defined the climate of the early 2020s in
Hennepin County, these dry conditions have not reversed the long‐term trend towards more
precipitation. In fact, as can be seen in GRAPHIC 4.3.1G above, even with the drought episodes, annual
precipitation during the early 2020s is still higher than every decade from the 1920s through the 1960s.
This is because the dry conditions have been episodic, generally limited to the warm season, and often
followed by very wet conditions in the cooler months.
29.73
26.17 26.76
31.50
27.74
25.17 23.88
25.72 24.97
26.85 27.18
29.88 31.14 29.57
34.31
27.11
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Da
y
s
wi
t
h
1+
In
c
h
An
n
u
a
l
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
(i
n
.
)
Twin Cities Average Annual Precipitation and Heavy Rain Days by Decade
Annual Precipitation Average Number 1‐inch Precip Days
39.72 40.27
43.40 44.91
40.02 37.47 36.90
44.66
49.05
55.68
61.45
52.65
47.46
54.36
60.18
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Av
e
r
a
g
e
Nu
m
b
e
r
of
Da
y
s
Se
a
s
o
n
a
l
Sn
o
w
f
a
l
l
(i
n
.
)
Twin Cities Average Seasonal Snowfall and Heavy Snow Days by Decade
Seasonal Snowfall Days with 4+ Inches
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
53
For instance, the six months from May through October of 2022 were the 4th driest on record in Hennepin
County, with the US Drought Monitor indicating Extreme Drought, the second‐highest level, over much of
the county. A very wet period quickly followed it, however, and the six months from November through
April 2023 became the fourth wettest on record. Dry conditions set in again, with May through August
2023 ranking 3rd driest on record, followed by much‐above‐normal precipitation in September and
October, and then the third‐wettest December on record. This oscillation between wet and dry regimes
is illustrated in GRAPHIC 4.3.1I.
GRAPHIC 4.3.1I Sequential episodes of very dry and very wet conditions during 2022 and 2023 in
Hennepin County. Source: DNR Climate Trends (https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/ewr/climatetrends/).
Humidity
Increased humidity has been notable during all seasons in recent decades. From 2000 through 2023, the
Twin Cities long‐term climate station measured more daily record‐high and fewer daily record‐low dew
point temperatures (a measure of humidity) than any other time since records began in late 1902. Of the
14 documented days with extreme humidity yielding at least one hourly 80° F dew point reading, 10 have
occurred since 1990, and none occurred prior to the 1960s.
Even though the highest air temperatures of summer and the number of 90° or 95° F days has not
increased over the long‐term, extremely humid conditions have at times combined with hot air masses to
yield unprecedented Heat Index values, which measure what the air feels during heat waves. On July 19,
2011, Flying Cloud airport measured a Heat Index of 122°F, while the Twin Cities airport measured 119 °F.
On August 22, 2023, another intense heat wave fueled by high moisture and dew points, sent Heat Index
values into the upper 110s F across the county, with 120° F recorded at the Hennepin‐West Mesonet
stations located in Hanover and at the MSP Airport.
Record humidity has not been confined to the summer, when it is most noticeable to humans, but in fact
‐50% 4th driest
54% 4th wettest
‐55% 3rd driest
33% 20th wettest
‐80%
‐60%
‐40%
‐20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
June ‐ October 2022 November 2022 ‐ April
2023
May ‐ August 2023 September ‐
December 2023
De
p
a
r
t
u
r
e
Recent Precipitation Departures from 1991‐2020 Averages, and
Ranks from 1895 to 2023 Hennepin County
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
54
has been observed throughout the year with increased frequency during recent decades. Most notably,
in 2021 latest date a 50° F dew point had ever been recorded at the Twin Cities long‐term station advanced
10 days, to December 15th, in 2021, and then 10 more days, to December 25th in 2023. The latest 60° dew
point on record was measured on November 10th of 2022. The earliest date to measure 50° F was February
20, 2017, and the earliest 60° F dew point occurred on March 17, 2012.
Increased humidity is not just a human comfort concern; it also has implications for precipitation and
severe weather frequency, because water vapor is what fuels precipitating weather systems. The high
dew points recorded on December 15, 2021, were associated with an unprecedented winter outbreak of
tornadoes and damaging thunderstorm winds in southeastern Minnesota. The December 25, 2023, high
dew points were associated with an unusually heavy December rainfall event. The 60° F dew point on
March 17, 2012, was matched or nearly matched for several more days, and fueled a rash of rare mid‐
March severe thunderstorms across Minnesota.
4.3.1.2. Range of Magnitude
Climate change is unlike other hazards because it is not episodic and does not “strike.” Rising global
temperatures represent a constant and increasing force that is always present, even when it is not
obviously detectable in each weather pattern or climatological data set.
The magnitude of climate change is generally measured as the total warming of the earth’s atmosphere
above “pre‐industrial” temperatures, with that period reflecting 1850‐1900 averages in some data sets,
or simply beginning in 1880 in other data sets. These temperatures are closely, but not exclusively linked
to the global concentrations of carbon dioxide, as measured at the Mauna Loa observatory in Hawaii.
Carbon dioxide levels have increased annually for decades, but while global temperatures have increased
steadily, natural factors, like El Niño and some ocean circulation phenomena, drive normal fluctuations
the global heat content.
Virtually all data sets show that the earth has warmed between 1.1° and 1.3° C (2 – 2.3° F), and most show
a continued warming rate 0.1 to 0.2° C (.18° to 0.36° F) per decade. These warming magnitudes and rates
are smoothed to remove the influence of large short‐term variations, including the world‐record
temperature spikes observed in 2023, when global temperatures exceeded 1.5° C above pre‐industrial
levels at times, and when the average anomaly was 1.3° to 1.54° C for the year.
Translating the magnitude of warming globally, into weather or climate impacts experienced in Hennepin
County is not straightforward. The science of “attribution,” or determining how much of a given trend,
change, or event, is attributable to human‐caused climate change, has largely focused on events that to
date have not included the area. These studies usually indicate that climate change is responsible for all,
or nearly all long‐term warming in non‐urbanized areas, and that it enhances or intensifies some types of
extreme weather events but does not “cause” them.
Given that the Twin Cities airport climate station is and has always been in an urban, built‐up area, we
know that some of the temperature increase seen there is because of urban “heat island” effects and not
the changing global climate. At rural stations, and in homogenized data sets like the county‐averaged one
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
55
referenced in other sections in this chapter, the urban warming “bias” is minimized or even non‐existent.
Rural counties to the west have similar long‐term temperature increases to Hennepin County. It is
therefore likely that the vast majority of the 3.1° F of average annual warming and the other seasonal
warming reported for Hennepin County results from human‐caused climate change.
Applying findings from attribution studies in other areas to common hazards in Hennepin County suggests
the following:
Climate change is likely making humid heatwaves in Minnesota more severe by increasing Heat
Index values by 4°‐6° F over what would have been observed without a warmer global climate.
This also has the effect of increasing the probability of occurrence dramatically.
Extremes of precipitation, including snowfall, may be 10‐15% larger because of the higher water
content of the atmosphere due to rising global temperatures.
o Similarly, the damaging snows of December 13‐16, 2022, to the north of the Twin Cities
may have had two climate changes making them more likely: 1) the increased availability
of moisture because of higher global temperatures, and 2) the winter warming that
caused the snow to be wetter, heavier, and thus more destructive.
Out‐of‐season events that result from unusually warm conditions, like the severe weather
outbreak of December 15, 2021, or a record‐breaking heat wave in early October of 2023, may
have been much more likely because of climate change, and therefore would have been
substantially less probable without human‐caused warming.
Any events of these types will become more probably with continued warming, and that
continued warming would make larger contributions to future events, meaning potentially
greater extremes of precipitation and humid heat waves in the decades ahead.
4.3.1.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
In Hennepin County, climate change has led to warmer conditions in general, especially during winter;
more precipitation, including during drought years; greater extremes of rain and snow; and more intense
humidity‐driven heatwaves. Additionally, the seasonal ranges of heatwaves and severe weather events
have expanded. Even though year‐to‐year and multi‐year variations will continue, these changes are
projected to continue as well, with an enhancement of some hazards as the world warms.
Warmer winter conditions pose some benefits for human comfort and safety but pose recreational risks
because of dangerous lake ice that may be unsuitable for fishing and ice skating. Natural systems
dependent on cold weather to keep out competitive species and predators also suffer from enhanced
winter warming, which can alter ecosystems and natural resources.
Increased rain and snow extremes mean roads and their supporting infrastructure may face increased
damages if they are not built to higher design standards. Heavy, wet snow, as occurred in the 2022‐23
winter, can damage trees, knock out power, and overwhelm some structures with snow loads.
Greater precipitation totals during wet years also would imply high water levels on area lakes and streams,
increasing chances for erosion, pollution from runoff, degraded water quality, stream bank failure,
landslides, and residential flooding.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
56
Humid heatwaves pose significant dangers to those working, recreating, or living outside. Increases in
these dangerous conditions will affect larger proportions of the population, as the risk moves from those
most vulnerable, to the general population, and even those in excellent physical condition.
Following are some consequences expected with climate change in Hennepin County:
● Less reliable and more dangerous lake ice
● More periods of bare/snow‐free ground, allowing frost to penetrate to great depths during cold
outbreaks.
● Expansion of the heavy rainfall season, leading to enhanced peak stream flows, and altered timing
of normal flow regimes.
● Increased runoff and flash‐flooding as the largest events intensify and become more common.
● Water infrastructure damage from intense rainfall events
● Agricultural stress, from shifting crop ranges, heat, drought, and extreme rainfall
● More days with high water vapor content and heat index values
● Greater summer cooling costs, more days requiring cooling.
● New invasive species, both terrestrial and aquatic, especially those acclimated to warmer climates
or those that were cold weather limited.
● “Hyper‐seasonality,” as warm conditions develop during the “off‐season,” leading to bouts of
heavy rainfall or severe weather, followed by wintry conditions.
● Increase in frequency of freeze‐thaw cycles, as winter is increasingly infiltrated by warm
conditions.
Some positive benefits of a changing climate might include fewer automobile accidents and damage as
more winter precipitation falls in the form of rain rather than snow or ice. However, warmer winters
doesn’t necessarily mean rain instead of snow, it could mean more ice storms, which would lead to
dangerous driving conditions and power outages due to down power lines. Also, rain falling in the winter
can be disastrous if it is followed by sharply colder air and a “flash‐freeze.”
Additionally, summertime air temperatures are extremely likely to begin increasing in the decades ahead,
and possibly before 2030. When these hotter summers pair with normal dry swings in the climate, they
will increase drought severity and water demand, while also increasing the potential for wildfire (see
drought section of risk assessment).
Some new research (as of 2023) indicates that extreme windstorms associated with thunderstorms may
become more probable, larger, and possibly more intense as the world continues warming. These studies
indicate that, as a result, a given extreme wind event may have the ability to affect more people and more
property than in the past—not accounting for the growth and the expansion of Hennepin County’s
population.
In recent years, smoke from wildfires has degraded air quality, occasionally to dangerous levels in
Hennepin County. Climate models project that wildfires and downstream smoke infiltration will become
more common as northern forests are weakened by warming winters, more severe heat waves, and even
precipitation extremes. Increased smoke particulates are a health hazard for everyone, but
disproportionally affects those with respiratory challenges, limited mobility, other health conditions, and
those who cannot shelter from the smoke.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
57
4.3.1.4. Potential for cascading effects
Climate change enhances some hazards, so please see chapters on Extreme Heat, Straight‐line winds,
Extreme rainfall, and non‐convective winds, to understand the potential cascades that climate change
may enhance or cause.
The most novel group of cascading effects to consider with climate change is when warm conditions
produce a meteorological situation previously unheard of or quite rare. Winter severe thunderstorm
events, for example, may be more likely as winters continue warming, but to occur, they would almost
certainly be accompanied by a powerful low‐pressure system capable of producing plunging temperatures
and strong winds. Communities facing power outages, debris clean‐up, and even search‐and‐rescue
operations may then have to face with cold weather hazards.
4.3.1.5. Geographic scope of hazard B1c
Climate change is a global hazard and influences weather and climate patterns in some way virtually
everywhere. In Minnesota, the greatest warming has been in the northern part of the state, and the
largest precipitation increases have been in the southeastern and central portions of the state. However,
the entire state of Minnesota, including all of Hennepin County is at risk from increased precipitation
extremes, more intense humid heat waves, and the seasonal expansion of severe thunderstorms and
heat.
4.3.1.6. Chronological patters (seasons, cycles, rhythm)
Warming is occurring year‐round, though the most pronounced changes have been during winter. It
should be noted that the area’s climate exhibits natural high variability, and that variability will continue,
even as Minnesota warms. It should also be noted that hazard risk does not necessarily follow the cycle
of greatest warming. For instance, damaging rains are far more likely in the summer than the winter.
4.3.1.7. Historical Data/Previous Occurrence B1d
The year 2012 may be thought of as a preview of the years and decades ahead. The 2011‐12 winter was
warm and short, with bouts of 50s and 60s observed throughout Minnesota during January. March that
year saw 8 record high temperatures in Minneapolis, and 8 days above 70 degrees. Throughout the region,
March 2012 obliterated long‐standing daily and monthly temperature records.
The warmth continued through the remainder of the spring and into the summer, with over 30 days above
90 degrees in parts of Hennepin County, and 2 days above 100 at MSP. This was the first summer with
multiple 100‐degree readings since the summer of 1988.
Others may consider the late 2010s to be representative of the future, because:
Based on the Midwest chapter from the 2014, 2018, and 2023 National Climate Assessment, a review of
other recent research into the region, and analyses of quality‐controlled, nationally standardized, and
publicly available data, the recent trends can be described as follows.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
58
● Bouts of extreme cold in Hennepin County and throughout Minnesota and the region are now at
an all‐time low in terms of both frequency and severity. Of all changes, the loss of cold weather
extremes has the strongest link with climate change.
● Extreme rainfall episodes have become both more intense and more frequent, and Minnesota
has seen seven “mega‐rainfall” events since the year 2000. Changes in extreme rainfall behaviors
are strongly linked to climate change.
● A general increase in annual and seasonal snowfall has been punctuated by an uptick in the size
and frequency of large snowfall events. This is likely related to the presence of warmer air and
more water vapor during winter, which provides more energy to passing low pressure systems
capable of producing snow.
● Severe thunderstorms and tornadoes pose challenges to long‐term analyses because of changes
in reporting procedures and detection technologies over time. That said, Minnesota has been in
a pronounced severe weather lull since the summer of 2011, which followed a very active spring
and record‐setting year for tornadoes in 2010. Confidence in the link between climate change and
observed severe weather trends is low. However, the severe weather season has expanded
aggressively in recent years, with record‐early tornadoes in Minnesota on March 6, 2017, and
record late tornadoes (by 30 days) on December 15, 2021.
● Humid heat waves have increased in severity and frequency, in response to higher humidity.
Summertime high temperatures and the number of hot days has not changed yet.
● Despite three straight years of significant growing season drought in 2021‐2023, Hennepin County
still does not have a long‐term trend towards increased drought frequency or severity.
These are just some examples of the effects of climate change in Hennepin County.
4.3.1.8. Future trends/likelihood of occurrence B1e
Projections of future climates from multiple sources indicate that the area is likely to continue to see a
rapid erosion of winter extreme cold temperatures, and it is expected that Hennepin County will fail to
reach previously common benchmarks by increasingly large margins.
Extreme rainfall is projected to increase, but it should not be expected to do so on a year‐after‐year basis.
Instead, climate change is increasing the long‐term frequency and magnitude of these events, meaning
that storms of a certain size may come every 10‐20 years instead of every 50 years. By mid‐century, the
area should receive an additional 3‐8 days per decade with rainfall in the top 2% of the historical
distribution (GRAPHIC 4.3.1J). Thus, the expectation is that unprecedented rainfall events will occur at
some point this century, but their likelihood in the next decade will be limited by their overall statistical
rareness.
GRAPHIC 4.3.1J Average difference in number of days per year by mid‐century (2040‐2070) with rainfall
in upper 2% of distribution.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
59
Snowfall extremes should continue to increase as well, although the warming of winter in general and the
effect of increased winter rains should eventually begin decreasing seasonal snowfall. However, even the
most aggressively warm model scenarios show that snow will be a major if not dominant winter
precipitation through much of the century.
Severe convective storms and tornadoes are unlikely to remain at the current low incidence rates, and a
“rebound” appears likely within the next decade, based on historical frequency alone. The association
between this rebound and climate change will remain unclear, however. It is increasingly clear that severe
convective storms will have expanded seasonal and geographic ranges. It is possible, based on new
research, that extreme straight‐line thunderstorm winds will be larger and/or more intense as the climate
continues warming.
Humid heat waves have already begun increasing in response to greater available humidity. Projections
indicate that summer temperatures are likely to increase significantly in Minnesota as well during the 21st
century. It remains unclear when these trends would begin, given a lack of any recent trends toward
increasing summertime high temperatures. However, projections indicate that by mid‐century, the Twin
Cities should expect 5‐10 additional days per year above 95° F, which would more than double current
frequencies (GRAPHIC 4.3.1K)
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
60
GRAPHIC 4.3.1K Difference in number of days per year by mid‐century (2040‐2070) maximum
temperatures above 95° F.
Like severe convective storms, drought has shown no trend towards increasing in frequency, severity,
duration, or areal coverage in recent decades. This is because the increases in precipitation have
overwhelmed even recent significant drought episodes.
Projections, however, indicate that drought will at a minimum become more severe in the future—when
it occurs. This increase would be in response to the inevitable increase in summertime high temperatures.
It remains unclear whether the actual frequency of drought conditions will increase. Projected increases
in the number of consecutive dry days during dry spells suggest that drought frequency may increase, in
the form of short, “flash” drought episodes, as have been common in the early 2020s (GRAPHIC 4.3.1L).
GRAPHIC 4.3.1L Difference in number of consecutive days per year by mid‐century (2040‐2070) with less
than 0.01 inches of precipitation. An increase in this variable is associated with an increase in the chance
of drought in the future.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
61
Projected changes in the same weather hazards that were shown and discussed previously are shown in
GRAPHIC 4.3.1M, along with confidence associated with the projections. Highest scientific confidence is
in the continued warming of winter, the continued loss of cold weather extremes, and continued increases
in extreme rainfall, leading to occasional unprecedented events. Increases heat waves are projected with
high confidence, because of both the increases in humidity already ongoing, and the increases in summer
temperature extremes projected unanimously by climate models. With these increases in heat extremes,
drought becomes somewhat more likely too, as described above; the severity of drought should increase
as summer temperatures do, but it is unclear whether drought frequency will increase. As the century
wears on, heavy snow events may continue being more extreme, but they should become less frequent
as winter warms even more. Confidence remains moderately low with severe thunderstorms in general,
even though seasonality will continue changing.
GRAPHIC 4.3.1N combines information known about observed and projected climate trends in
Minnesota.
GRAPHIC 4.3.1M Confidence that various common Minnesota weather hazards will be impacted by
climate change through 2070.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
62
GRAPHIC 4.3.1N Confidence that various common Minnesota weather hazards will be impacted by
climate change beyond 2026.
4.3.1.9. Indications and Forecasting
Climate change is known to be ongoing and is continuously monitored by climatologists, atmospheric
scientists, chemists, biologist, physicists, oceanographers, geologists, and many others. This includes the
study of greenhouse gas concentrations, global temperatures, historical events, complex interactions
between varying earth systems, and building forecasting models to make sophisticated global, regional,
and local projections.
The state of the climate and the state of climate science are monitored and reported regularly by
thousands of scientists in an array of fields and summarized in assessment reports provided by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and by the US Global Change Research Program.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
63
4.3.1.10. Detection & Warning
The same scientists who contribute to the body of research summarized in the national and global
assessment reports also issue statements and warnings regarding the trajectory of the climate and the
steps needed to change that trajectory, and/or to protect ourselves against potentially dire consequences
of not changing that trajectory.
While there are no warnings for climate change like tornado warnings, or flash flood warnings, the IPCC
effectively issues warnings with the release of its reports. Some scientists also often issue warnings
individually or as smaller groups. The overwhelming consensus among climate scientists is that the climate
is changing faster than we can manage and that without fast reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, we
will face severe consequences from heat waves, rising sea levels, larger storms, and greater extremes in
general.
4.3.1.11. Critical values and thresholds
Climate change is an ongoing phenomenon that manifests itself through the persistent change in the
statistical behavior of climatic variables. Although no critical values and thresholds exist in Minnesota, the
following indicators represent rare and/or uncharted territory in Hennepin County, and would indicate
climate change mileposts:
February ice‐out, Lake Minnetonka; earliest on record is March 11, 1878
Lack of zero or colder temperature at MSP; has not happened yet, and fewest such readings was
two in 2001‐02
Winter average temperature above 27° F ‐‐has only happened once, during “year without a
winter” of 1877‐78
Low temperatures failing to reach ‐10° F. Previously it was ‐20° F, and then ‐15°F, but it we now
commonly fail to reach these thresholds.
No subzero high temperature all winter
Summertime minimum temperatures in excess of 80 degrees
90° F in March, 70° F in December or February
Tornadoes or severe convective storms at any time from November through February
4.3.1.12. Prevention
Preventing climate change requires global coordination and massively reducing the amount of coal, oil,
and natural gas burnt for personal, municipal, industrial, and vehicular purposes. However, in the
mitigation section you will find strategies to reduce the effects as well as adaptation examples for the
changing climate.
Hennepin County has a comprehensive Climate Action Plan that includes ambitious goals to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions across the county to “Net Zero” (no emissions, or all emissions balanced by
reductions) by 2050. While this alone cannot stop climate change, it represents the type of action needed
on a larger scale to do so.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
64
4.3.1.13. Mitigation
In climate change studies and policy, “mitigation” refers to prevention of the climate change specifically
through reducing greenhouse gas concentrations globally. The term “adaptation” generally refers to
protecting systems and communities from the changing climate.
Hennepin County’s Climate Action Plan lays out steps for not only reducing the greenhouse gas emissions
that lead to heat retention and rising global temperatures, but also to adapt the county to the changing
climate in a manner intended to improve resiliency and equity, while reducing vulnerabilities.
The plan has specific goals to:
Protect and engage people, especially vulnerable communities.
Enhance public safety.
Increase the resilience of the built environment and protect natural resources.
Reduce emissions in ways that align with core county functions and priorities.
Partner in ways that can be most impactful.
The overall risks of future climate change impacts can be reduced by limiting the rate and magnitude of
climate change by efforts to reduce or prevent emission of greenhouse gases.
Adaptation and mitigation are complementary strategies for reducing and managing risks of climate
change. Mitigation can mean using new technologies and renewable energies, making older equipment
more energy efficient, or changing management practices or consumer behavior. It can be as complex as
a plan for a new city, or as a simple as improvements to a cook stove design. Efforts underway around the
world range from high‐tech subway systems to bicycling paths and walkways. Protecting natural carbon
sinks like forests and oceans or creating new sinks through green agriculture are also elements of
mitigation. Adaptation examples are shown in Table 4.3.1B.
Table 4.3.1B.
Category Examples
Human Develop. Improved access to education, nutrition, health facilities, energy, safe housing &
settlement structures, & social support structures; Reduced gender inequality &
marginalization in other forms.
Poverty Alleviation Improved access to & control of local resources; Land tenure; Disaster risk reduction;
Social safety nets & social protection; Insurance schemes.
Livelihood Security
Income, asset & livelihood diversification; Improved infrastructure; Access to technology
& decision‐ making fora; Increased decision‐making power; Changed cropping, livestock
& aquaculture practices; Reliance on social networks.
Disaster Risk Management Early warning systems; Hazard & vulnerability mapping; Diversifying water resources;
Improved drainage; Flood & cyclone shelters; Building codes & practices; Storm &
wastewater management; Transport & road infrastructure improvements.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
65
Ecosystem Management
Maintaining wetlands & urban green spaces; Coastal afforestation; Watershed &
reservoir management; Reduction of other stressors on ecosystems & of habitat
fragmentation; Maintenance of genetic diversity; Manipulation of disturbance regimes;
Community‐based natural resource management.
Spatial or land‐use planning Provisioning of adequate housing, infrastructure & services; Managing development in
flood prone & other high‐risk areas; Urban planning & upgrading programs; Land zoning
laws; Easements; Protected areas.
Structural/Phy
Engineered & built‐environment options: Sea walls & coastal protection structures;
Flood levees; Water storage; Improved drainage; Flood & cyclone shelters; Building
codes & practices; Storm & wastewater management; Transport & road infrastructure
improvements; Floating houses; Power plant & electricity grid adjustments.
Technological options: New crop & animal varieties; Indigenous, traditional & local
knowledge, technologies & methods; Efficient irrigation; Water‐saving technologies;
Desalinization; Conservation agriculture; Food storage & preservation facilities; Hazard &
vulnerability mapping & monitoring; Early warning systems; Building insulation;
Mechanical & passive cooling; Technology development, transfer & diffusion.
Ecosystem‐based options: Ecological restoration; Soil conservation; Afforestation &
reforestation; Mangrove conservation & replanting; Green infrastructure (e.g., shade
trees, green roofs); Controlling overfishing; Fisheries co‐management; Assisted species
migration & dispersal; Ecological corridors; Seed banks, gene banks & other ex situ
conservation; Community‐based natural resource management.
Services: Social safety nets & social protection; Food banks & distribution of food
surplus; Municipal services including water & sanitation; Vaccination programs; Essential
public health services; Enhanced emergency medical services.
Institutional
Economic options: Financial incentives; Insurance; Catastrophe bonds; Payments for
ecosystem services; Pricing water to encourage universal provision and careful use;
Microfinance; Disaster contingency funds; Cash transfers; Public‐private
partnerships.
Laws & regulations: Land zoning laws; Building standards & practices; Easements; Water
regulations & agreements; Laws to support disaster risk reduction; Laws to encourage
insurance purchasing; Defined property rights & land tenure security; Protected areas;
Fishing quotas; Patent pools & technology transfer.
National & government policies & programs: National & regional adaptation plans
including mainstreaming; Sub‐national & local adaptation plans; Economic
diversification; Urban upgrading programs; Municipal water management programs;
Disaster planning & preparedness; Integrated water resource management; Integrated
coastal zone management; Ecosystem‐based management; Community‐based
adaptation.
Educational options: Awareness raising & integrating into education; Gender equity in
education; Extension services; Sharing indigenous, traditional & local knowledge;
Participatory action research & social learning; Knowledge‐sharing & learning platforms.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
66
Social
Informational options: Hazard & vulnerability mapping; Early warning & response
systems; Systematic monitoring & remote sensing; Climate services; Use of indigenous
climate observations; Participatory scenario development; Integrated assessments.
Behavioral options: Household preparation & evacuation planning; Migration; Soil
& water conservation; Storm drain clearance; Livelihood diversification; Changed
cropping, livestock & aquaculture practices; Reliance on social networks.
Spheres of change
Practical: Social & technical innovations, behavioral shifts, or institutional & managerial
changes that produce substantial shifts in outcomes.
Political: Political, social, cultural & ecological decisions & actions consistent with
reducing vulnerability & risk & supporting adaptation, mitigation & sustainable
development.
Personal: Individual & collective assumptions, beliefs, values & worldviews influencing
climate‐change responses.
4.3.1.14. Response
See Hennepin County Emergency Operations Plan
4.3.1.15. Recovery
Because it is very difficult to link a specific event to climate change, it is difficult to discuss recovery as it
pertains to climate change versus each individual event as in other hazards. Please refer to the other
hazard sections to review recovery from the specific hazard.
4.3.1.16. References
Brooks, H.E. 2013. "Severe Thunderstorms and Climate Change". Atmospheric Research 123: 129‐138.
doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.04.002.
Climate.nasa.gov, 2016. "Vital Signs of the Planet". http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/.
Diffenbaugh, N. S., M. Scherer, and R. J. Trapp. 2013. "Robust Increases In Severe Thunderstorm
Environments In Response To Greenhouse Forcing". Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 110 (41): 16361‐16366. doi:10.1073/pnas.1307758110.
Dnr.state.mn.us, 2012. "Balmy Winter in The Twin Cities 2011‐2012: Minnesota DNR".
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/11_12_balmy_winter.html.
Dnr.state.mn.us, 2015. "The Year without A Winter: 1877‐78: Minnesota DNR".
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/1877_1878_winter.html.
Freshwater Society,. 2013. "157 Years of Lake Minnetonka Ice‐Out History". http://freshwater.org/wp‐
content/uploads/joomla/iceout/2012iceout.pdf.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
67
González‐Alemán, J. J., D. Insua‐Costa, E. Bazile, S. González‐Herrero, M. Marcello Miglietta, P.
Groenemeijer, and M. G. Donat. 2023. Anthropogenic Warming Had a Crucial Role in Triggering the
Historic and Destructive Mediterranean Derecho in Summer 2022. Bulletin of the American
Meteorological Society, 104, E1526–E1532, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS‐D‐23‐0119.1.
Harding, Keith J., Peter K. Snyder, and Stefan Liess. 2013. "Use of Dynamical Downscaling To Improve the
Simulation of Central U.S. Warm Season Precipitation in CMIP5 Models". Journal of Geophysical
Research: Atmospheres 118 (22): 12,522‐12,536. DOI: 10.1002/2013jd019994.
Hennepin County. 2021. “Climate Action Plan.” https://www.hennepin.us/climate‐action/‐
/media/climate‐action/hennepin‐county‐climate‐action‐plan‐final.pdf
IPCC, 2018: Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the
impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre‐industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas
emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate
change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson‐Delmotte, V., P. Zhai,
H.‐O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma‐Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S.
Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T.
Waterfield (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3‐24,
doi:10.1017/9781009157940.001.
IPCC, 2023: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of
Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1‐
34, doi: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6‐9789291691647.001
Lasher‐Trapp, S., S. A. Orendorf, and R. J. Trapp. 2023. Investigating a Derecho in a Future Warmer
Climate. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 104, E1831–E1852, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS‐D‐22‐0173.1.
Marvel, K., W. Su, R. Delgado, S. Aarons, A. Chatterjee, M.E. Garcia, Z. Hausfather, K. Hayhoe, D.A.
Hence, E.B. Jewett, A. Robel, D. Singh, A. Tripati, and R.S. Vose, 2023: Ch. 2. Climate trends. In:
Fifth National Climate Assessment. Crimmins, A.R., C.W. Avery, D.R. Easterling, K.E. Kunkel, B.C.
Stewart, and T.K. Maycock, Eds. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA.
https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA5.2023.CH2
Minnesota DNR, 2021. “Mid‐December Tornadoes, Derecho, and Damaging Cold Front‐‐December 15‐
16, 2021.” https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/mid‐december‐tornadoes‐derecho‐and‐
damaging‐cold‐front‐december‐15‐16‐2021.html
Minnesota DNR, 2022. “Blizzard, Ice, Slush Storm, and Rain, December 13‐17, 2022”
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/blizzard‐ice‐slush‐storm‐and‐rain‐december‐13‐16‐
2022.html
Minnesota DNR, 2023. “Historic Autumn Heat, September 30 ‐ October 3, 2023”
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/historic‐autumn‐heat.html
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
68
National Climate Assessment, 2016. "National Climate Assessment".
http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/report.
Ncdc.noaa.gov, 2016. "Global Analysis ‐ Annual 2015 | National Centers for Environmental Information
(NCEI)". http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201513.
NOAA, Climate.gov, 2024. “What's in a number? The meaning of the 1.5‐C climate threshold.”
https://www.climate.gov/news‐features/features/whats‐number‐meaning‐15‐c‐climate‐threshold
Prein, A.F. 2023. Thunderstorm straight line winds intensify with climate change. Nature Climate Change
13, 1353–1359, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558‐023‐01852‐9
U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2013. Regional
Climate Trends and Scenarios for the U.S. National Climate Assessment. Washington, D.C.
USGCRP, 2023: Fifth National Climate Assessment. Crimmins, A.R., C.W. Avery, D.R. Easterling, K.E.
Kunkel, B.C. Stewart, and T.K. Maycock, Eds. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington,
DC, USA. https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA5.2023
Unep.org, 2016. "Climate Change Mitigation". http://www.unep.org/climatechange/mitigation/.
Wilson, A.B., J.M. Baker, E.A. Ainsworth, J. Andresen, J.A. Austin, J.S. Dukes, E. Gibbons, B.O. Hoppe, O.E.
LeDee, J. Noel, H.A. Roop, S.A. Smith, D.P. Todey, R. Wolf, and J.D. Wood, 2023: Ch. 24. Midwest.
In: Fifth National Climate Assessment. Crimmins, A.R., C.W. Avery, D.R. Easterling, K.E. Kunkel, B.C.
Stewart, and T.K. Maycock, Eds. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA.
https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA5.2023.CH24
World Weather Attribution, 2017. “Climate change fingerprints confirmed in Hurricane Harvey’s rainfall,
August 2017.” https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/hurricane‐harvey‐august‐2017/
World Weather Attribution, 2021. “Western North American extreme heat virtually impossible without
human‐caused climate change.” https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/western‐north‐
american‐extreme‐heat‐virtually‐impossible‐without‐human‐caused‐climate‐change/
World Weather Attribution, 2023. “Extreme humid heat in South Asia in April 2023, largely driven by
climate change, detrimental to vulnerable and disadvantaged communities.”
https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/extreme‐humid‐heat‐in‐south‐asia‐in‐april‐2023‐
largely‐driven‐by‐climate‐change‐detrimental‐to‐vulnerable‐and‐disadvantaged‐communities/
World Weather Attribution, 2023. “Extreme heat in North America, Europe and China in July 2023 made
much more likely by climate change.” https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/extreme‐heat‐in‐
north‐america‐europe‐and‐china‐in‐july‐2023‐made‐much‐more‐likely‐by‐climate‐change/
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
69
4.3.2. Hazard Assessment: TORNADO
4.3.2.1. Definition
A tornado is defined as a violently rotating column of air
that reaches from a wall cloud or updraft base of a
severe thunderstorm to the ground. Most tornadoes
occur in severe thunderstorms, but not all severe
thunderstorms will contain tornadoes. Tornado
development depends on either condensed moisture
from above and/or dust or debris from the surface to
become visible. The wind speeds, width, duration, and
length of travel of tornadoes vary widely. The degree of
destruction depends on both the strength of the tornado
and of what has been hit. Tornadoes may form alone or in some instances they may have satellites or
twins that are in proximity. Some regions may experience several tornadoes that form during a few hours
in a phenomenon called an outbreak. Outbreaks that repeat over several days are called an outbreak
sequence.
4.3.2.2. Range of Magnitude
Tornadoes can appear in a variety of shapes and sizes ranging from large wedge shapes with a diameter
greater than a mile down to thin rope like circulations. The strongest tornadoes can have wind speeds
more than 200 mph. Tornado wind speeds are estimated after the fact based on the damage they
produce. Tornadoes are characterized on a scale of 0 (weakest) to 5 (strongest) according to the Enhanced
Fujita (EF) Scale. The original Fujita Scale was devised in 1971 by Dr. Ted Fujita of the University of Chicago.
The scale gives meteorologist the ability to rate from F0 to F5 based upon the type and severity of damage
that the tornado produced. At that time, there were very few actual measurements of tornado wind
speeds that he could relate to the damage, but Dr. Fujita used them together with a lot of insight to devise
approximate wind speed ranges for each damage category.
In subsequent years, structural engineers have examined damage from many tornadoes. They use
knowledge of the wind forces needed to damage or destroy various buildings and their component parts
to estimate the wind speeds that caused the observed damage. What they found was that the original
Fujita Scale wind speeds were too high for categories F3 and higher, which may have led to inconsistent
ratings, including possible overestimates of associated wind speeds.
With these inconsistent ratings in mind, a panel of meteorologists and engineers convened by the Wind
Science and Engineering Research Center at Texas University devised the new Enhanced Fujita Scale,
which became active as of February 1, 2007. The EF Scale incorporates more damage indicators and
degrees of damage than the original “F” Scale, allowing more detailed analysis and better correlation
between damage and wind speed. You can see both scale charts below TABLE 4.3.2A.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
70
TABLE 4.3.2A Fujita Scale
The follow are records from around the County as well as Hennepin County.
Maximum wind speed
United States
o 318 MPH (Moore, OK, May 3, 1999)
Hennepin County
o 166‐200 (estimated)
Maximum width
United States
o 2.6 miles (El Reno, OK Tornado, May 31, 2013)
Hennepin County
o 880 Yards (St. Louis Park, May 22, 2011)
Longest track
United States
o 235 miles (Tri‐State Tornado, March 18, 1925)
Hennepin County
o Hennepin: 70.9 Miles (June 23, 1952)
Fastest forward motion:
United States
o 73MPH (Tri‐State Tornado, March 18, 1925)
Hennepin County
o 30 MPH (Champlin‐Anoka Tornado, June 18th, 1939)4
Largest outbreak
United States
o 211 tornadoes in 24 hours (SE US outbreak, April 27, 2011)
Hennepin County
o 3 tornadoes in 3 hours (May 6, 1965)
Longest duration
United States
o 3.5 hours (Tri‐State Tornado, March 18, 2915)
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
71
Greatest pressure drop.
United States
o 100 milibars (Manchester, SD, June 24, 2003). *An unofficial drop of 194 millibars
was noted from the Tulia, TX tornado on April 21, 2007.
Costliest tornado
United States
o $2.9 billion (Joplin, MO, May 22, 2011)
Deadliest tornado
United States
o 695 killed (Tri‐State Tornado, March 18, 1925)
Deadliest modern‐day tornado
United States
o 158 killed (Joplin, MO, May 22, 2011)
Deadliest tornado outbreak
United States
o 747 killed (Tri‐State Outbreak, March 18, 1925)
Deadliest modern‐day outbreak
United States
o 324 killed (SE US Outbreak, April 25‐28, 2011)
4.3.2.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
The consequences from tornadoes can range from minor damage and injuries to complete destruction
and death. Please see the chart below (TABLE 4.3.2B) that correlates the EF rating scale with the expected
damage seen.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
72
TABLE 4.3.2B EF Rating Scale
4.3.2.4. Potential for Cascading Effects
Beyond the destruction and lives that tornadoes leave behind, there are many cascading events or hazards
that can follow. If a tornado takes out a power source and there is expected extreme temperatures to
follow, you have now increased the number of people vulnerable to extreme heat or cold event
consequences. A lack of power impacts the ability of people to remain warm or cool and may also disable
medical equipment. If a tornado disrupts farming is, anyway, this can lead to food shortages and/or
disrupt the food chain. As debris is deposited anywhere and everywhere from a tornado, this can lead to
water contamination, and a fire hazard with lumber from houses, buildings and trees amongst damaged
power lines and gas leaks.
Another consequence is the economy impact. Indirect losses that occur from the destruction of a tornado
are hard to estimate directly after an event. Losses could include lost production, sales, incomes and labor
time, increased commute times and transportation costs from goods having to be rerouted, decreased
tourist activity, and utility disruptions. Some people might lose their jobs all together. The decreased
economic activity also results in lost taxable receipts and uses up federal disaster relief funds to help the
clean‐up, repair, and replacing of loss assets. Loss of production an also result in surging prices due to
shortages. A well‐known example of this occurred when refineries were affected by a tornado in the
southern United States in 2011, which caused gas prices to rise.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
73
4.3.2.5. Geographic Scope of Hazard B1c
The United States has the highest incidence of tornadoes worldwide, with more than 1,000 occurring
every year. This is due to the unique geography that brings together polar air from Canada, tropical air
from the Gulf of Mexico, and dry air from the Southwest to clash in the middle of the country, producing
thunderstorms and the tornadoes. The illustration below (GRAPHIC 4.3.2A) provides all tornadoes that
have occurred from 1950‐2012 as plotted by the Storm Prediction Center.
GRAPHIC 4.3.2A National Tornado Occurrence Map 1950‐2012
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
74
The illustration below (GRAPHIC 4.3.2B) provides all tornadoes that have occurred from 1820‐2014 as
listed by Hennepin County Archives.
GRAPHIC 4.3.2B Hennepin County Tornado Occurrence map 1820‐2014
4.3.2.6. Chronological Patterns
Tornadoes can occur during any time of day and any time of year. However, most tornadoes have occurred
in the afternoon hours and during the months of May through August. The graphic below (GRAPHIC
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
75
4.3.2C) shows the tornado reports nationally from 1950‐2014. You can see in the chart that tornadoes
occur (and are reported) more typically starting in April through September with the greatest months
being June and July. These two months are typically identified as Minnesota’s tornado season.
GRAPHIC 4.3.2C
4.3.2.7. Historical Data/previous occurrence B1d
Native peoples in tornado‐prone areas such as Hennepin County experienced tornadoes and developed
oral traditions to explain them. The first written record of an American tornado is from July 8, 1680, in
Cambridge, MA. The first officially recorded tornado in Minnesota was sighted near Fort Snelling in
Hennepin County on April 19, 1820. Because tornadoes are more numerous in the United States than any
other nation, tornadoes have been studied here more than anywhere else. In 1882, the U.S. Army Signal
Corps assigned Sgt. John Finley to investigate weather conditions that form tornadoes. Technology limits
made the early understanding of tornado anatomy difficult. The adoption of radar revolutionized the
study and forecasting of tornadoes. The first US Weather Bureau radar in Minnesota was installed at the
Minneapolis‐Saint Paul International Airport in the early 1960s. Air Force meteorologists issued the first
tornado forecast in March 1948. The US Weather Bureau followed suit by 1952. Important advancements
in understanding tornadoes were made by Theodore Fujita who studied tornado formation and damage
across the Midwest in the 1960s and 70s. Modern era radar was installed at the Twin Cities office of the
National Weather Service in 1996.
In Minnesota and Hennepin County, the record of tornado sightings encompasses nearly 200 years from
records kept at Fort Snelling. The local newspaper record, which often contain notices of weather events,
goes back over 160 years. In general, early reports are incomplete and may contain some factual errors.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
# of
Re
p
o
r
t
s
Month
Number of Tornado Reports Per ‐Month 1950‐2014
Storm Data, National Climatic Data Center, MN DNR 2014
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
76
As settlement and population density increased, human interactions with tornadoes also increased.
Reports became more numerous. GRAPHIC 4.3.2D and GRAPHIC 4.3.2E depict standardized and reliable
tornado data in Minnesota and in Hennepin County extending back to 1950. Advanced technology has
made detection easier and resulted in more reports of weak tornadoes.
May 22, 2011
May 6, 1965
There have been no other incidents identified.
GRAPHIC 4.3.2D
686
468
207
68 33 6
211
90
26 9 5 0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
F0/EF0 F1/EF1 F2/EF2 F3/EF3 F4/EF4 F5/EF5
Nu
m
b
e
r
of
Oc
u
r
e
n
c
e
s
Minnesota Tornadoes Since 1950
F Scale EF Scale
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
77
GRAPHIC 4.3.2E
4.3.2.8. Future Trends B1e
When looking at trends of tornado occurrences, one must keep in mind how reporting has changed over
the last decade as well as population increase. With more people covering a larger geographical area than
100 years ago, there is bound to be more reports of tornadoes occurring because people are there to see
them. There seems to be no trend since 1954 of the occurrences of F1 and stronger tornadoes and
increase in tornado reports results from an increase in the weakest tornadoes, F0. If just looking at
stronger events being reported, you can run into the problem of changes in tornado damage assessment
procedures in trend identification.
Taking out changes in population and reporting measures, there is less trend in the number of tornadoes
per year, as in there doesn’t seem to be a growing number of tornadoes each year, or less for that matter.
Research does show there seem to be more extreme swings in tornadoes per year. While years have
always varied in terms of number of tornadoes, they generally fell between a certain range. In the past
decade however, researchers have started seeing toad counts that have deviated well outside of that
range. Another trend researchers are seeing is the number of tornado days seems to be decreasing, while
the number of tornadoes per day has been increasing.
Researchers have also been looking into trends on when the ‘tornado season’ starts. The average start
days of tornadoes is March 22nd, and that has not changed (tornado season start is defined as first 50
tornadoes of F1/EF1 strength have been reported). However, there have been later and early starts to the
season in recent years. Seven of the 10 earliest tornado starts have occurred since 1996, and four of the
latest starts occurred between 1999 and 2013 of 60 years of records.
8
6
4
3
22
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
F0/EF0 F1/EF1 F2/EF2 F3/EF3 F4/EF4 F5/EF5
Nu
m
b
e
r
of
Oc
c
u
r
e
n
c
e
s
Hennepin County Tornadoes 1950
F Scale EF Scale
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
78
4.3.2.9. Indications and Forecasting
National responsibility for developing tornado indications and forecasts rests with the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration/National Weather Service’s Storm Prediction Center (SPC) in Norman,
Oklahoma. The SPC issues daily Convective Weather Outlooks. These outlooks give general categories that
explain the chances/risk of tornadoes each day. As conditions look to develop more favorable for tornadic
storms to occur, the SPC will issue Mesoscale Discussions (MDs). MDs contain a graphical depiction of the
mesoscale convective developments, an area affected line, concerning line, valid time, a summary
paragraph summary, and a paragraph for a technical discussion. There are five categories of concern
issued with the MD:
Severe Potential…Watch Unlikely (5 or 20%)
Severe Potential…Watch Possible (40 or 60%)
Severe Potential…Watch likely (80 or 95%)
Severe Potential…Tornado Watch likely (80 or 95%)
Severe Potential…Severe Thunderstorm Watch Likely (80 or 95%)
Severe Potential…Watch Needed Soon (95%)
After an MD is issued, SPC will monitor conditions and if tornadic potential still is likely, they will issue a
tornado watch. A tornado watch is issued when atmospheric conditions are favorable for the
development of severe thunderstorms capable of producing tornadoes. On average, Hennepin County is
included in 4 tornado watches each year. In addition to the SPC’s information about potential for
tornadoes, the National Weather Service Forecast Office will issue Hazardous Weather Outlook (HWO)
based on their thoughts for the potential of tornadoes occurring. In this discussion, they will highlight the
best time, and generally geographic location for storms to occur.
4.3.2.10. Detection and Warning
National responsibility for detection and warning of tornadoes falls on the local National Weather
Service’s Weather Forecast Offices (WFO). The local WFO for Hennepin County is in Chanhassen, MN. One
of the systems the WFO uses to detect tornadoes is RADAR. There are two RADAR sites that the
Chanhassen WFO uses, the NEXRAD WSR‐88D and the Terminal RADAR. The NEXRAD WSR‐88D is located
at the Chanhassen WFO office, and the Terminal RADAR is in Woodbury and is used daily for incoming
aircraft. There are many different products that the NWS can use from these RADARS that help them
detect whether a storm has a tornadic signature to it.
Another avenue that the WFO uses are spotter reports, or reports from emergency managers. In the
metro region, there is an organized amateur radio group called Metro SKYWARN that teach SKYWARN
spotter classes to amateur radio operators so they can make reports directly to the local WFO. Hennepin
County Emergency Management also trains internal SKYWARN spotters to report to the Hennepin County
Emergency Operations Center during activations or directly to the local WFO.
If the WFO sees evidence that there is a tornado either on the ground, or the potential, they will issue a
tornado warning. A tornado warning means a severe thunderstorm has developed and has either
produced a tornado or radar has indicated the presence of atmospheric conditions conductive to tornado
development. On average, Hennepin County is in a tornado warning between 30 and 45 minutes a year.
Once a tornado warning has been issued, there are a variety of notification systems that notified
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
79
automatically in which they then send off the notification of tornado warning as well: Wireless Emergency
Alerts (WEA), Outdoor Warning Sirens, Digital Message Signs, IPAWS, and NOAA Weather Radios. In
addition to the automatic notification, television and radio station may also begin to broadcast the
warning information.
4.3.2.11. Critical Values and Thresholds
According to NOAA, there is no single critical threshold values to confirm or predict the occurrence of
tornadoes of a particular intensity without looking at damage. The critical values of the F & EF tornadoes
scales can be seen above in the Range of Magnitude section.
4.3.2.12. Prevention
There is nothing you can do to prevent a tornado from occurring. However, you can prevent some of the
consequences from occurring by being prepared. It is crucial to always be aware of the weather forecast
and if there is a possibility of severe weather. Further, having multiple methods of receiving weather alerts
from official sources is also important.
4.3.2.13. Mitigation
While there is no way to prevent a tornado from occurring, you can prevent some of the consequences
from occurring by being weather aware for life safety, build safe rooms for sheltering or retrofit walls to
safe room standard. Here are some of the ideas from the FEMA Mitigations Handbook
Education and Awareness Programs:
Conduct outreach activities to increase awareness of tornado risk and impacts.
Educate citizen through media outlets.
Conducting tornado drills in schools and public buildings
Teaching schoolchildren about the dangers of tornadoes and how to take safety precautions.
Distributing tornado shelter location information
Supporting severe weather awareness week
Promoting use of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Weather Radios.
Construction of Safe Rooms:
Requiring construction of safe rooms in new schools, daycares, and nursing homes.
Encouraging the construction and use of safe rooms in homes and shelter areas of manufactured
home parks, fairgrounds, shopping malls, or other vulnerable public structures.
Encouraging builders and homeowners to locate tornado safe rooms inside or directly adjacent
to houses to prevent injuries due to flying debris or hail.
Developing a local grant program to assist homeowners who wish to construct a new safe room.
Require Wind‐Resistant Building or Retrofitting Techniques:
Structural bracing
Straps and Clips Anchor Bolts
Laminated or impact‐resistant glass.
Reinforcement pedestrian and garage door
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
80
4.3.2.14. Response
Hennepin County Emergency Management Capabilities
Situation monitoring Station (SMS)
HCEM Immediate Impact Reconnaissance Teams
Mutual Aid
4.3.2.15. Recovery
There are two types of recovery, short term, and long term. Initial short‐term recovery can be getting the
power back on or cleaning up debris. There are many things to consider when talking about long‐term
recovery. Depending on the extend of the tornado and location, large, wooded areas can pose a fire
threat, so damaged trees and branches need to be managed. Another important consideration is business
recovery. It took Joplin 3 years to be able to re‐build their hospital and high school. Other businesses have
been shown the struggle for one or more years after a disaster. Another consideration of recovery is the
mental recovery of not only victims, but of the rescue workers that responded and helped during the
initial short‐term recovery process.
4.3.2.16. References
Brooks, H. E., G. W. Carbin, and P. T. Marsh. 2014. 'Increased Variability of Tornado Occurrence in the
United States'. Science 346 (6207): 349‐352. doi:10.1126/science.1257460.
Kunkel, Kenneth E., Thomas R. Karl, Harold Brooks, James Kossin, Jay H. Lawrimore, Derek Arndt, and
Lance Bosart et al. 2013. 'Monitoring and Understanding Trends in Extreme Storms: State of
Knowledge'. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 94 (4): 499‐514. doi:10.1175/bams‐d‐11‐00262.1.
Metro Skywarn. 2015. 'Metro Skywarn'. https://metroskywarn.org/.
National Centers for Environmental Information. 2015. 'Severe Weather Data | National Centers For
Environmental Information (NCEI) Formerly Known As National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)'.
Ncdc.Noaa.Gov. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data‐access/severe‐weather
U.S. Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau. 1946. Climatological Data, Minnesota. National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental data and Information Service, National
Climatic Center.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
81
4.3.3. Hazard Assessment: WIND, EXTREME STRAIGHT‐LINE
4.3.3.1. Definition
Extreme straight‐line winds are thunderstorm winds
that exceed 70 mph and can reach or exceed 100
mph. Along with damage potential to trees, power
lines, vehicles and structures, these winds pose risks
to life and safety.
Most thunderstorms produce gusty winds from
downdrafts of air flowing from the tops of the storm.
Some thunderstorms produce winds of 58 mph or
stronger, officially making them “severe” by National
Weather Service standards.
Occasionally, severe thunderstorms will produce
destructive winds that far exceed the 58‐mph
threshold. These winds are often referred to as “straight‐line winds,” to differentiate them from the
cyclonic, turning winds of a tornado. Extreme straight‐line winds can indeed produce tornado‐like
damage.
Extreme thunderstorm winds can be highly localized, or widespread along an arc of storms extending
dozens of miles or concentrated locally in numerous individual cells within a line or cluster of storms. The
duration of straight‐line winds at a given location can be as brief as 30 seconds or can last upwards of 30
minutes. The storms producing the extreme winds may cover just 30 miles, or they may track for hours
and cover hundreds of miles.
The latter case represents an important class of extreme thunderstorm winds called “derechos.” A
Derecho is an extreme, widespread, and long‐lived windstorm, usually associated with bands of rapidly
moving showers or thunderstorms variously known as bow echoes, squall lines, or quasi‐linear convective
systems. If the swath of wind damage extends for more than 240 miles, includes wind gusts of at least 58
mph along most of its length, and several, well‐separated 75 mph or greater gusts, then the event may be
classified as a derecho.
In general, derechos follow two basic types: Progressive Derechos tend to form on the northern edge of a
steamy air mass, and the derecho is usually associated with one primary, very intense thunderstorm cell
that follows the boundary of the hot air. These derechos have the greatest potential for catastrophic
damage, and given enough instability, there is almost no limit to the intensity of their thunderstorm winds.
Serial Derechos, by contrast, tend to form to the west of warm and unstable air masses, often along cold
fronts, and often in the presence of very fast winds aloft. These instances lead to long, arcing, fast‐moving
lines of storms with many different cells, any of which can harness the strong winds aloft and produce
damaging winds. These derechos can produce widespread damage because of all the “candidate” storm
cells, but they generally lack the destructive potential of progressive derechos.
Hennepin County has been affected by numerous extreme straight‐line windstorms, including derechos.
Every decade from the 1950s through the 2010s had multiple extreme thunderstorm wind events within
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
82
the county.
4.3.3.2. Range of magnitude
Maximum wind speeds:
● Hennepin:
○ Measured 100 mph, Wold‐Chamberlain Field (MSP), July
20, 1951
○ Measured 86 mph at Flying Cloud Airport, on 15 July
1980
○ Estimated over 100 mph on July 3, 1983
● Other Twin Cities Metro:
○ 110 mph sustained, gust 180 mph, St. Paul, Aug 20, 1904
● Minnesota:
○ 121 mph, Donaldson, MN, September 1, 2011
○ 117 mph, Alexandria, July 19, 1983
● Region:
○ 128 mph (Northeast of Madison, WI May 31, 1998)
○ 126 mph, Atkins, IA, August 10, 2020 (140 mph estimated
from damage surveys)
Maximum width: 100 miles (Kansas – The “Super Derecho of May 8, 2009)
Longest track: 1300 miles (The Boundary Waters‐Canadian Derecho July 4‐5, 1999)
Longest duration: 22 hours (The Boundary Waters‐Canadian Derecho July 4‐5, 1999)
Costliest US Derecho: $7.5 Billion (The Iowa‐Midwest Derecho of August 10, 2020)
Deadliest US Derecho: 73 killed (The “More Trees Down” Derecho July 4‐5, 1980)
4.3.3.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
Extreme thunderstorm winds and derechos are most common in the warm season and pose risks to those
involved in outdoor activities. Campers or hikers in forested areas are vulnerable to being injured or killed
by falling trees. Boaters risk injury or drowning from storm winds and high waves that can overturn boats.
Trees around lakes pose risks to walkers, joggers, and cyclists. At outside events such as fairs and festivals,
people may be killed or injured by collapsing tents and flying debris. Additionally, anyone caught outside
may be injured by flying debris. Any person without adequate shelter is at significant risk in extreme
thunderstorm winds.
Occupants of cars and trucks also are vulnerable to being hit by falling trees and utility poles. Further, high
profile vehicles such as semi‐trailer trucks, buses, and sport utility vehicles may be blown over.
Even those indoors may be at risk for death or injury during derechos. Mobile homes may be overturned
or destroyed, while barns and similar buildings can collapse. People inside homes, businesses, and schools
are sometimes victims of falling trees and branches that crash through walls and roofs; they also may be
injured by flying glass from broken windows. Finally, structural damage to the building itself (for example,
removal of a roof) could pose danger to those within.
Throughout Hennepin County, and especially in suburban and urban areas, electrical lines are vulnerable
to high winds and falling trees. In addition to posing a direct hazard to anyone caught below the falling
lines, wind damage to the power infrastructure can result in massive, long‐lasting power outages.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
83
Hundreds of thousands of people may lose power for a week or more, as happened most recently in 2013.
In addition, unlike the localized damage produced by a tornado, often covering the equivalent of one
square mile, extreme thunderstorm wind damage can be widespread, affecting tens or even hundreds of
square miles within the county. As a result, repairs often require substantial effort, with additional delays
related to shortages in supplies.
Extreme straight‐line winds also can expose socio‐economic vulnerabilities among Hennepin County’s
diverse and growing population. Derechos and severe thunderstorms can strike quickly, posing serious
challenges to the elderly, or anyone with limited mobility who is caught outside. Those new to the region
who are unfamiliar with severe weather, how to access information about it, and how to respond, may
be caught off‐guard and unprepared for the dangerous winds. Language barriers also may prevent some
people from getting vital information as the storm is approaching. Anyone without adequate shelter will
be subject to all the risks of being outside during dangerous thunderstorm winds. In general, extreme
thunderstorm winds pose greater threats to disadvantaged populations that may lack the resources
others have to anticipate, plan for, seek shelter from, and recover from extreme straight‐line winds.
4.3.3.4. Potential for cascading effects
Flash Flooding ‐ On occasion, the convective system responsible extreme wind damage will stall,
back‐build, or regenerate, producing excessive rainfall. In other cases, the storm may simply
unload enormous quantities of rainfall. On July 1, 1997, a complex of thunderstorms produced
80‐110 mph winds and extensive damage from Wright into western Hennepin County, while
dropping 3‐5 inches of rain in 60‐90 minutes over much of the area. The rains flooded every type
of road in the county, submerging vehicles and significantly delaying emergency vehicles deployed
to respond to the extreme wind event.
Power Outages and Arctic Outbreaks – Dangerously cold air had never been considered a serious
concern in relation to extreme thunderstorm winds and derechos, which tend to form during the
warm season. On December 15, 2021, however, a historic outbreak of intense thunderstorm
winds and tornadoes struck southeastern Minnesota, knocking out power for 1‐3 days as
temperatures in the 10s F settled into the region.
Any extreme straight‐line wind occurring outside the usual warm season, and particularly
between November and March, may pose significant cold weather risks in its aftermath. Without
power, electrical baseboard heat will not operate, nor will many appliances, security systems,
electronic devices, or lights.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
84
Power Outages and Intense Heat – Some of the most intense summer thunderstorm winds and
the explosive class of “progressive derechos” tend to occur on the fringes of major heat waves.
The heat and deep moisture often pool near the boundary that promotes the development of
thunderstorms, and those ingredients
act to fuel the intensification of the
storms and the development of
destructive winds.
When thunderstorm winds damage the
electrical infrastructure during or prior
to intense heat waves, residents are left
without the benefit of air‐conditioning
while having to deal with intense heat.
This sort of cascading effect occurred in
the Ohio Valley and eastern US on June
29, 2012, when a derecho traveled for
700 miles, impacting 10 states and
Washington, D.C. An estimated 4 million
customers lost power for up to a week.
The region impacted by the derecho was
also during a heat wave, which claimed
34 lives in areas without power following
the derecho.
Wildland Fires – Extreme straight‐line winds and derechos can obliterate millions of trees across
miles of forest due to the extreme winds associated with them. This increases fuel loads on
forests and escalates the risk of wildland fire.
Tornadoes – Extreme straight‐line winds and tornadoes can and do occur with the same
convective system at times. In addition to the December 15, 2021, event discussed above,
damaging straight‐line winds and tornadoes also occurred near each other in or close to Hennepin
County on July 3, 1983, July 1, 1997, and September 21, 2005.
The tornadoes may occur with isolated supercells ahead of the derecho producing squall line, or
they may develop from storms within the squall line itself. Tornadoes have occurred with serial
derechos, as on December 15, 2021, and on May 12, 2022, in southwestern Minnesota, and they
have also occurred with progressive derechos, as on July 3, 1983.
Blizzards – It has yet to be documented in Minnesota, but any cold‐season derecho is likely to be
associated with a vigorous low‐pressure system and it would be possible for not just cold air, but
intense snow and wind, to follow damaging thunderstorms within 6 to 48 hours.
This map illustrates the large‐scale meteorological
environment favorable for progressive and serial
derechos on the northern or western fringe of a high‐
pressure area associated with a major heat wave over
central and eastern United States.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
85
4.3.3.5. Geographic Scope of Hazard B1c
Hennepin County is within a high‐frequency corridor for extreme thunderstorm winds and derechos that
covers much of the eastern half of the US.
Every part of the county has experienced
significant damage from unusually intense
thunderstorm winds. Within the county,
there are no favored areas. Winds estimated
to 80 mph hit downtown Minneapolis in April
of 1986, tearing a hole in the roof of the
Metrodome. Winds at least that strong winds
have hit every corner of the county, with 100
mph winds measured at the international
airport in 1951, and winds likely well over 100
mph striking the northern suburbs in July of
1983.
Nationally, derechos most commonly occur
along two axes. One track parallels the "Corn
Belt" from the upper Mississippi Valley
southeast into the Ohio Valley; the other
extends from the southern Plains northeast
into the mid‐Mississippi Valley. During the
cool season (September through April),
derechos are relatively infrequent but are
most likely to occur from east Texas into the southeastern states. Although derechos are rare west of the
Great Plains, derechos occasionally do occur over interior portions of the western United States, especially
during spring and early summer.
The highest annual frequencies of occurrence appear along the "Corn Belt," from Minnesota and Iowa
into western Pennsylvania, and in the south‐central states, from eastern parts of the southern Plains into
the lower Mississippi Valley. However, the frequencies vary by season. During the warm season (May
through August), derecho events are most frequent in the western part of the Corn Belt. During the
remainder of the year (September through April), the maximum frequencies shift south into the lower
Mississippi Valley
4.3.3.6. Chronologic patterns (seasons, cycles, rhythm)
Extreme straight‐line winds and derechos in the United States are most common in the late spring and
summer (May through August), with more than 75% occurring between April and August. The seasonal
variation of derechos corresponds rather closely with the incidence of thunderstorms. However, as noted
above, Minnesota (and neighboring states) experienced extreme straight‐line winds qualifying as a
derecho on December 15, 2021.
Approximate number of times "moderate and high intensity"
(MH) derechos affected points in the United States during the
years 1980 through 2001. Areas affected by 3 or more derecho
events are shaded in yellow, orange, and red.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
86
4.3.3.7. Historical data/previous occurrence B1d
The Independence Day Derecho of
1977
Although it did not affect Hennepin
County, the “Independence Day
Derecho of 1977” formed over west
central Minnesota on the morning of
Monday, July 4th. As the derecho
moved east‐southeast, it became
very intense over central Minnesota
around midday. From that time through the afternoon, the derecho produced winds of 80 to
more than 100 mph, with areas of extreme damage from central Minnesota into northern
Wisconsin.
The derecho continued rapidly southeast across parts of Lower Michigan during the evening,
producing winds up to 70 mph and considerable damage before finally weakening over northern
Ohio around 1:30 AM on Tuesday, July 5th. This event was notable for affecting recreationist and
travelers out enjoying the Independence Day holiday.
West Metro to Northern Wisconsin Derecho of 1983
On July 3, 1983, between 12:30
and 13:20 local time, a complex of
extremely severe thunderstorms
affected a southwest to northeast
swath of Hennepin County.
Damage was most extensive from
eastern Lake Minnetonka,
through Maple Grove and
Champlin. The storms continued
into Anoka County and produced
the Twin Cities area’s most recent
EF‐4 tornado in Andover (most
recent as of January 2024).
Extreme straight‐line winds
caused significant damage in a
southwest‐to‐northeast swath across Hennepin County. The storm complex raced northeastward
into Wisconsin during the next few hours, and aerial surveys conducted by the University of
Chicago found over 150 linear miles of continuous EF‐1‐equivalent straight‐line wind damage,
with pockets of EF‐2 damage—stretching from Carver County to Ashland, Wisconsin. The National
Weather Service Issued “Very Severe Thunderstorm Warnings” for the storm, to indicate winds in
excess of 75 mph, and sirens sounded throughout Hennepin County.
This storm remains (as of 2024) the most destructive severe convective storm event in the Twin
Cities Metropolitan Area, since the May 6, 1965, tornado outbreak.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
87
The I‐94 Derecho of 1983
Around dawn on the morning of Tuesday, July 19, 1983, well north of warm/stationary front over
South Dakota and northern Iowa, a bow echo moved out of northeast Montana and began
producing damaging winds in northwest North Dakota. This would be the beginning of a
noteworthy progressive derecho event that would move across the northern Great Plains and
upper Mississippi Valley and reach the Chicago metropolitan area by late evening.
As the convective system's cold
pool continued to deepen and
elongate east‐southeastward with
the mean cloud‐layer flow, it
ultimately reached the warm front
as that boundary advanced slowly
north across eastern South Dakota
and southern Minnesota. This
meeting occurred during the early
afternoon over west central
Minnesota, and likely accounts for
the appreciable increase in storm
strength observed around that time
as the convection became surface
based. At this time the storm
system also expanded in scale, evolving into a squall line with two and sometimes three bow echo
segments as it continued across Minnesota and later Wisconsin, with Interstate 94 near its central
axis.
Winds over 100 mph were recorded at the airport in Alexandria, Minnesota, Minnesota, where
planes and hangers were damaged and destroyed. The storm continued to produce much damage
as it moved east‐southeast across south central and southeast Minnesota; approximately 250,000
customers lost electrical power in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area, a record at that time. Thirty‐four
people were injured in Minnesota and Wisconsin from this storm. Of these injuries, 12 were from
mobile homes being blown over, and eight were from falling trees.
The Northwoods/ “Right Turn” Derecho of 1995
During the late afternoon of Wednesday,
July 12, 1995, thunderstorms formed over
southeast Montana and began producing
winds that damaged homes and barns. As
the storm system moved east across North
Dakota, vehicles were overturned, and a
grain bin was destroyed. Measured winds
reached 70 mph at Bismarck, ND. As the
system approached Fargo during the early
morning of July 13th, it became a well‐
defined bow echo storm with measured
winds of 91 mph at the Fargo airport. The
The path of the 1983 I‐94 Derecho as it crossed over six states on
July 19, 1983.
The path of the “Right Turn” Derecho of 1995. One of
three derechos to occur on consecutive days across
Northern Minnesota.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
88
derecho was becoming a "high end" event.
The derecho took a track similar to one of the previous nights, producing significant damage for
the second night in a row from southeast North Dakota eastward across northern Minnesota to
western Lake Superior. Damage was extreme across Minnesota, with over five million trees blown
down and many buildings damaged, and some destroyed. Six campers were injured from the
falling trees during the pre‐dawn hours. Trucks with plows were needed to clear many of the
roads, and some areas were without power for a week. Damage totaled well over $30 million in
1995 dollars.
Extreme Thunderstorm Winds and Other Hazards, July 1, 1997
A complex of very intense thunderstorms moved out of South Dakota during the afternoon and
approached the Twin Cities during the early evening, producing multiple tornadoes rated up to F‐
3 (now EF‐3), along with destructive winds that spread from central Minnesota into Wright,
Sherburne, Hennepin, and Anoka counties and beyond. Although not long enough to qualify as a
derecho, this storm was as destructive over a path that was over 100 miles long and 10 miles wide
in some areas.
Wind gusts estimated from 85 to 110 mph damaged small airports and planes; destroyed homes
and garages; snapped or uprooted tens of thousands of trees; flipped trailers and mobile homes;
blew down headstones in cemeteries; and produced over 100,000 power outages in the western
and northern Twin Cities area, including Hennepin County.
The storms also produced extreme rainfall rates, exceeding the threshold for 200 or even 500‐
years storms at the 1 and 2‐hour duration, as 3‐5 inches of rain occurred in 60‐90 minutes. The
rains overwhelmed drainage capacity across Hennepin County and stranded or submerged
vehicles on parts of Interstates 94, 394, 494, 694, 35‐W, along with parts of US Highways 10, 169,
and 212, and literally dozens of other state, county, and smaller roads. The intense flash‐flooding
hampered emergency responses in the parts of the county damaged by winds.
Hail Derecho, May 15, 1998
A severe squall line developed in western Texas around midnight and raced northeastward,
making it to south‐central Kansas by daybreak, southwestern Iowa by mid‐morning, and the Twin
Cities area by 16:00 local time. The storms produced widespread damaging wind along the 1000‐
mile‐long track, and reached peak intensity in Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, with fast‐moving
tornadoes and 1‐2” hail driven by 60‐80 mph winds.
This was an unusual extreme wind event, qualifying easily as a derecho, but not fitting easily into
the “progressive” or “serial” categories. This is among the only known damaging thunderstorm
events in Minnesota history to have originated in Texas.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
89
The storms produced a record number of power outages in Minnesota (the record has since been
broken twice), and snapped or uprooted thousands of trees in Hennepin County alone (with
estimates of over 1000
trees killed in Ramsey
County). A tornado tracked
from Roseville into Blaine,
at an estimated speed of 80
mph, causing significant
damage to homes. The
majority of the damages,
however, were from wind‐
driven hail, which broke
windows, damaged roofs,
bent garage doors, and
forced automobile
dealerships in Bloomington
to submit claims for their
entire outdoor inventories.
The compound hail and wind damage from this storm produced over a billion dollars, adjusted for
inflation, in home, automobile, and business property insurance claims.
The largest hail reported in the Twin Cities was 2 inches, and most reports were in the 1‐1.5” range.
However, the intense straight‐line winds turned the hail into dangerous projectiles, and produced
far more damage than would normally be expected.
The Southern Great Lakes Derecho of 1998
During the early evening of Saturday, May 30,
tornado‐producing supercells over eastern
South Dakota merged and became a squall
line that moved east into southern
Minnesota. As the squall line crossed
southern Minnesota it evolved into a bow
echo system that expanded in scale and
raced east across the southern Great Lakes
before finally dissipating over central New
York after sunrise on Sunday, May 31st. This
bow echo system produced one of the most
dangerous and costly derecho events in the
history of the Great Lakes region. The
"Southern Great Lakes Derecho of 1998"
adversely affected millions of people on the
weekend after Memorial Day. Many
casualties and record amounts of damage
occurred.
Radar at 16:25 local, as bowing hail core entered central Twin Cities on May
15, 1998
The Southern Great Lakes Derecho as it moved over
Hennepin County On Saturday, May 30th.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
90
The bow echo system began to produce significant wind damage over south‐central Minnesota
about 10 p.m. Saturday evening. As the system moved rapidly eastward it grew south into
northern Iowa and caused damaging winds over most of southeast Minnesota and northeast
Iowa. Many trees and power lines were blown down and several farm buildings were damaged or
destroyed.
The most intense damage occurred near the northern end of the bow echo system in Minnesota,
from Sibley and McLeod Counties eastward across southern portions of the Minneapolis/St. Paul
metropolitan area. Along this band, winds greater than 80 mph were measured; in some areas,
estimated speeds reached 100 mph. Tens of thousands of trees were blown down, 500,000
customers lost power, two semi‐trailer trucks were overturned, two apartment building roofs
were blown off, and 100 boats were destroyed. In addition, over 100 homes were destroyed or
badly damaged, and over 2000 others received some damage. Twenty‐two people were injured,
and damage to property was estimated to be about $48 million in 1998 U.S. dollars...with $35
million dollars of that damage occurring in Dakota County alone.
In summary, while crossing southern Minnesota and northeastern Iowa, the derecho event
caused about $50 million in 1998 U.S. dollars of damage, left about 600,000 customers without
power, and injured twenty‐two people. In some areas, power was not restored until nearly a week
after the event.
Boundary Waters – Canadian Derecho
On July 4, 1991, a major derecho in
the BWCAW, known as the
Boundary Waters‐Canadian
Derecho, lasted for more than 22
hours, traveled more than 1,300
miles, and produced wind speeds
averaging nearly 60 mph, peaking at
80‐100 mph. The blowdown caused
widespread devastation with
casualties both in Canada and the
United States. The storm front
initiated as large complex of
thunderstorms in South Dakota. The
storm moved west to east snapping
tree trunks in half that pulled power lines down with them in Cass, Crow Wing, Itasca and Aitkin
Counties. After blowing down trees on 1,300 acres on the Chippewa National Forest and dropping
heavy rains that eroded 9,000 acres of shorelines, the storm continued into northeast Minnesota.
The storm entered the Arrowhead region of northeastern Minnesota in the early afternoon. Here,
winds of 80 to 100 mph resulted in injuries to about 60 canoe campers and damage to tens of
millions of trees within 477,000 acres of forest land on the Superior National Forest in the course
of leveling a swath 30 miles long and 4 to 12 miles wide. The storm affected approximately
477,000 acres (16 percent of the Superior National Forest). The BWCAW sustained the heaviest
damage in a line from Ely to the end of the Gunflint Trail.
Figure 2. Percentage of trees blown down in Superior National
Forest in northeast Minnesota on July 4, 1999. Scale: 1" = 15
miles. (Courtesy of USDA Forest Service, Superior National
Forest)
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
91
Other Notable or Recent Extreme Thunderstorm Wind Events
o September 21, 2005 (Hennepin County)—Large, slow‐moving supercell thunderstorms
produced large hail, tornadoes, and extreme downburst winds in Anoka and northern
Hennepin County, with wind gusts estimated up 100 mph in Brooklyn Center, where a
man was killed by falling trees.
o September 20, 2018 (southern Minnesota)—A line of fast‐moving thunderstorms, like a
serial derecho but not traveling far enough to qualify, produced nearly continuous and
severe damage as tornadoes and straight‐line winds ravaged communities in south‐
central and southeastern Minnesota, including Waseca, Owatonna, Faribault, Northfield,
and Cannon Falls. National Weather Service surveys indicated straight‐line winds exceed
100 mph.
o July 19 (central Minnesota and July 20, 2019 (southern Minnesota)—An intense heat
wave with Heat Index values to 115° F fueled a derecho that tracked 490 miles from
central Minnesota into Michigan. The next day, as the heat dome settled southward,
another derecho tracked 860 miles from western South Dakota, through southern
Minnesota, Wisconsin, and northern lower Michigan, crossing the damage path of the
previous day’s extreme winds in Wisconsin.
o August 10, 2020 (Iowa and Midwest) – One of the most extensive and destructive
mainland storm events in US history, an extreme derecho tracked from the
Iowa/Nebraska border to the Indiana/Ohio border, reaching maximum intensity in
eastern Iowa, where winds gusted over 100 mph over an unusually large area, with 80‐
120 mph gusts lasting over 30 minutes in areas near Cedar Rapids.
o December 15, 2021 (Southeast Minnesota and Midwest) – By far the latest‐in‐the‐
season severe weather outbreak in Minnesota, this serial derecho traveled from southern
Nebraska into Wisconsin, producing widespread 75 mph winds and 22 tornadoes across
south‐central and southeastern Minnesota, damaging buildings and homes, uprooting
trees, and knocking out power. One man near Rochester was killed by straight‐line winds.
This event set a record back to 2004 for most reports of hurricane‐force (74 mph) wind
gusts. The storms were followed quickly by a strong cold front the dropped temperatures
into the 20s and 10s F, as extreme non‐convective winds associated with a powerful low‐
pressure area spread over the region.
o May 12, 2022 (Corn Belt into western Minnesota)– Another powerful serial derecho with
wind gusts of 85 to over 100 mph required just six hours to track from southern Nebraska
to the Brainerd Lakes area of Minnesota. This massive event produced a dust storm from
the dry conditions in western and central Minnesota, along with extensive damage to
towns and rural properties. As of October 2023, this event was estimated to have
produced over three billion dollars in damage across the region.
4.3.3.8. Future trends/likelihood of occurrence B1e
For decades, the science was inconclusive about the connection between climate change and extreme
thunderstorm winds or derechos, suggesting and trends in the frequency or intensity of these dangerous
hazards would be short‐lived and attributable primarily to “normal” variations in weather and climate
patterns.
Recent research, however, has suggested that a warming climate can influence the size and/or intensity
of derechos and other extreme thunderstorm wind events. Physical modelling simulations of the August
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
92
2020 derecho in Iowa revealed that while the storm would not necessarily have produced stronger winds
in a warmer world, the likelihood of a stronger nearby heat wave would have allowed the damaging winds
to cover more area and last longer.
Another investigation of extreme straight‐line wind occurrences showed an observed increase both their
intensity and their areal coverage in the United States as the climate has warmed and theorized a 7.5%
increase in intensity for each additional degree C (1.8 degrees F) of warming.
Similarly, a study of a lethal 2022 Mediterranean derecho showed that the marine heat wave in its vicinity
that helped fuel it was itself made substantially more likely and more intense by rising global
temperatures. This marine heatwave contributed substantial intensity and wind energy to the
thunderstorm complex, which simulations showed would have been of “ordinary” strength in the absence
of climate change.
Taken together, these studies suggest that the changing climate can make extreme straight‐line
thunderstorm winds and derechos larger, longer lasting, and in some cases, more intense. As the climate
continues warming, therefore, a given extreme straight‐line wind event may be more likely to affect
Hennepin County and neighboring areas.
4.3.3.9. Indications and Forecasting
National responsibility for developing tornado indications and forecasts rests with the National Weather
Service’s Storm Prediction Center (SPC) in Norman, Oklahoma, and the local National Weather Service
office in Chanhassen.
4.3.3.10. Critical Values & Thresholds
Winds in a derecho must meet the National Weather Service criterion for severe wind gusts (greater than
57 mph) at most points along the derecho path. Most other extreme straight‐line wind events are well
above this threshold as well. In stronger derechos, winds may exceed 100 mph.
Based on current warning criteria and analysis of local and regional storm events, the following thresholds
apply:
58+ mph: Entry level for “severe.” Some damage to trees and powerlines.
70+ mph: outdoor warning sirens activated in Hennepin County; significant tree and electrical
infrastructure damage, with structural damage possible.
80+ mph: Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEAs) triggered; structural and vehicular damage likely;
risks from airborne debris.
100+ mph: tornado‐like damage expected, with secondary damage from debris‐bombardment.
4.3.3.11. Preparedness
Hennepin County Emergency Management employs meteorologists who monitor the potential for
extreme straight‐line winds and communicate with an array of county personnel as conditions warrant.
Those planning to be outdoors for a significant length of time must be aware of the weather forecasts,
especially if well‐removed from sturdy shelter. Preparation means staying "connected" via television,
radio, NOAA Weather Radio, or social media. Extreme straight‐line winds rarely occur without warning,
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
93
although warning lead times may be comparatively limited during the early stages of storm development.
Emergency water and food supplies, can openers, batteries, and flashlights should be on‐hand in case of
power disruptions.
4.3.3.12. Mitigation
Education and Awareness Programs
Educating homeowners on the benefits of wind retrofits such as shutters and hurricane
clips.
Ensuring that school officials are aware of the best area of refuge in school buildings.
Educating design professionals to include wind mitigation during building design.
Structural Mitigation Projects – Public Buildings & Critical Facilities
Anchoring roof‐mounted heating, ventilation, and air conditioner units
Purchase backup generators
Upgrading and maintaining existing lightning protection systems to prevent roof cover
damage.
Converting traffic lights to mast arms.
Structural Mitigation Projects – Residential
Reinforcing garage doors
Inspecting and retrofitting roofs to adequate standards to provide wind resistance.
Retrofitting with load‐path connectors to strengthen the structural frames.
4.3.3.13. Recovery
Recovery from extreme straight‐line winds can take weeks as power outages from these storms can be
extensive. A widespread event, or one in densely populated areas, may require search‐and‐rescue
operations, which can be hampered when fallen trees or downed power lines block critical routes. Utility
and infrastructure repair needs can exceed local resources and staff availability. Homes and businesses
often require extensive repairs, bottlenecking the supply of contractors who provide such work, and
opening the door to out‐of‐state and even predatory contract services who exploit the desperation and
confusion often associated with disaster recovery.
Hennepin County Emergency Management Capabilities:
Situation Monitoring Station (SMS)
Virtual Situation Monitoring Station (VSMS)
Damage Assessment Teams.
Hennepin County Emergency Plans:
Hennepin County Emergency Operations Plan
4.3.3.14. References
2023. González‐Alemán, J. J., D. Insua‐Costa, E. Bazile, S. González‐Herrero, M. Marcello Miglietta, P.
Groenemeijer, and M. G. Donat. Anthropogenic Warming Had a Crucial Role in Triggering the Historic
and Destructive Mediterranean Derecho in Summer 2022. Bulletin of the American Meteorological
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
94
Society, 104, E1526–E1532, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS‐D‐23‐0119.1.
2023. Lasher‐Trapp, S., S. A. Orendorf, and R. J. Trapp. Investigating a Derecho in a Future Warmer
Climate. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 104, E1831–E1852, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS‐D‐22‐0173.1.
2023. Prein, A.F. Thunderstorm straight line winds intensify with climate change. Nature Climate Change
13, 1353–1359, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558‐023‐01852‐9
2022. Minnesota DNR. “Destructive thunderstorms, May 12, 2022.”
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/destructive‐thunderstorms‐may‐12‐2022.html
2021. Minnesota DNR. “Mid‐December Tornadoes, Derecho, and Damaging Cold Front‐‐December 15‐
16, 2021. https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/mid‐december‐tornadoes‐derecho‐and‐
damaging‐cold‐front‐december‐15‐16‐2021.html
2020. National Weather Service, Quad Cities. “Midwest Derecho ‐ August 10, 2020, Updated: 10/8/20 12
pm.” https://www.weather.gov/dvn/summary_081020
2019. Minnesota DNR. “Concentrated Thunderstorm Wind Damage, July 20, 2019.”
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/concentrated‐thunderstorm‐wind‐damage‐july‐20‐
2019.html
2019. Minnesota DNR. “Extreme Heat and Big Storms, July 19, 2019.”
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/extreme‐heat‐and‐big‐storms‐july‐19‐2019.html
2018. National Weather Service, Twin Cities. “September 20, 2018, Tornado Outbreak and Widespread
Damaging Wind (updated 11/15).” https://www.weather.gov/mpx/20180920_Severe_Weather
Date unknown. National Weather Service, Storm Prediction Center. “About Derechos.”
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/misc/AbtDerechos/derechofacts.htm. Retrieved 2015.
January 2013. “NOAA Service Assessment. The Historic Derecho of June 29, 2012.” U.S. Department of
Commerce.
2007. Mosier, Keith. “After the Blowdown: A Resource Assessment of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area
Wilderness, 1999‐2003.” United States Department of Agriculture.
2002. Sanders, Jim. “After the Storm. A Progress Report from the Superior National Forest.” United
States Department of Agriculture.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
95
4.3.4. Hazard Assessment: HAIL
4.3.4.1. Definition
Hail is precipitation that is
formed when updrafts in
thunderstorms carry raindrops
upward into extremely cold
areas of the thunderstorm where
they are continuously lofted and
form into hail. They eventually
become heavy and fall to the
ground. Hail can cause billions of
dollars of damage to structures,
cars, aircraft, and crops, and can
be deadly to livestock and
people.
Damaging hail is associated with
severe thunderstorms, and is
often found in proximity to
strong winds, torrential rainfall,
and even tornadoes.
Supercell thunderstorms are responsible for most Minnesota hail reports more than 1.5 inches in
diameter, and nearly all reports in excess of 2.5 inches. These supercell thunderstorms may or may not be
tornadic at the time of hail production. Damage becomes significantly more likely as hail size increases
because the impact factor increases exponentially with incremental growth (Table 4.3.4A).
Table 4.3.4A Hail diameter and impact. From Marshall et al. (2001).
Hail Diameter 1” 2” 3”
Impact (foot‐lbs) <1 22 120
4.3.4.2. Range of magnitude
Largest hail stones reported.
● Hennepin:
○ 3‐inch diameter, Minneapolis, August 11, 2023
○ 3‐inch diameter, Independence, August 5, 2019
○ 4‐inch diameter, Bloomington, Richfield, South Minneapolis, July 8, 1966
● Adjacent counties:
○ 4‐inch diameter, Delano, Wright County, August 5, 2019
○ 4.25‐inch diameter, New Prague, Scott County, August 24, 2006
Large hail, source NSSL (http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/education/svrwx101/hail/)
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
96
○ 4‐inch diameter, northern Anoka County, June 14, 1981
○ 4‐inch diameter, Zimmerman, Sherburne County, August 27, 1990
● Minnesota:
○ 6‐inch diameter, between Edgerton (Pipestone County) and Chandler (Murray County),
July 4, 1968
○ 6‐inch diameter, near Worthington, Nobles County, July 28, 1986
● US: Record diameter of 8” recorded at Vivian, SD, on July 23, 2010.
Costliest hail event
● May 15, 1998: $950 million USD in 1998 dollars (~3.1 billion in 2023) from damages in Minnesota
resulting from hail, straight‐line winds, and isolated tornadoes. Vast majority of losses were from
wind‐driven hail, which destroyed thousands of new and used vehicles, roofs and siding on
thousands of homes.
4.3.4.3. Spectrum of consequences
B2b
Ultimately, the thunderstorm
strength governs the size of
hailstones and dictates the amount
of time a given area will be exposed
to them. Hail falling in small
“popcorn” thunder‐ storms that
form with weak instability and low
shear tends to be short‐lived and sub
severe (less than 1” diameter),
although in rare instances can be up
to golf ball‐sized (1.75”). Hail in fast‐
moving squall‐lines tends to be
short‐lived and similar in size,
although intense winds may turn the
hail into dangerous and damaging
projectiles. In large and/or slow‐
moving supercell thunderstorms,
hail can fall for up to 30 minutes at a given location, and the high instability and shear producing these
storms also often yields golf ball‐or‐larger hail stones. Although somewhat rare, regenerating supercell
thunderstorms may produce multiple hailfalls over a given location during a single event.
Hail over one inch in diameter may produce small “dimples” or “pocks” on vehicle exteriors. At 1.5 inches,
damage to roofing materials becomes common. At sizes greater than 2”, windshields and rear windows
are often cracked or shattered, vehicle bodies damaged badly, residential windows may be broken,
residential siding welted, and many varieties of roofs badly damaged (Table 4.3.4B) for an example of roof
damage thresholds).
Although fatalities are uncommon, injuries to the head, shoulders, back, and arms are not. Severe bruising,
often in multiple locations, is the most typical type of injury. Drivers and passengers of vehicles also may
have cuts and lacerations from flying glass.
Significant mobile home damage from hail. Source: NSSL
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
97
Table 4.3.4B. Damage onset thresholds for various roofing materials. From Marshall et al. (2002).
Large hailstorms also tend to halt traffic and may require snow removal equipment to clear area roads. An
early morning hail event in November of 1999 caused traffic jams and spinouts in Eden Prairie, and
snowplows were needed to clear over 2 inches of accumulated hailstones from I‐494. ‘
Although the human toll from hail tends to be much lower than from tornadoes and straight‐line winds,
hailstorms are often costlier, because of the costs associated with cosmetic damages to residences,
vehicles, and businesses. Severe crop damage is also common, with soybeans and corn especially
susceptible to damages from wind‐blown hail. Hail rarely causes infrastructural damage.
4.3.4.4. Potential for cascading effects
The consequences of hail are generally limited to the duration of the hail event, providing few options for
cascading effects. However, large, and damaging hail events tend to be associated with strong or severe
thunderstorms that produce or can produce other convective weather hazards, which can exacerbate or
compound the impacts. The large hail core in a tornado‐producing supercell thunderstorm is often very
near the tornado itself. Thus, hail damage victims are at risk of becoming tornado victims as well. High
situational awareness is therefore required during large hail. Any person caught outside during a hailstorm
is also at significant risk from excessive rainfall and lightning. Any building or vehicle with shattered
windows is also more susceptible to flying debris through those now open windows as well.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
98
4.3.4.5. Geographic scope of hazard
B1c
Minnesota is north and east of the
spatial hail frequency maximum within
the US, which stretches from
southwestern South Dakota, into
Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Colorado,
and Texas.
Within Minnesota, hail tends to be
most common in the southern and
western portions of the state, although
large and damaging hail has been
observed in every county. The map of
all known 4” hail reports since 1955
does show a preference for western
and southern Minnesota, but also
shows a clustering of reports near the Twin Cities, where more people are available to observe and report
hail.
4.3.4.6. Chronologic patterns (seasons, cycles, rhythm)
Most years, Hennepin County sees at least one large hail
event. The seasonal hail threat coincides with the
thunderstorm season, generally from April through
September, with a notable peak in frequency in June
and July. Severe hail has been reported as early as
March in Hennepin County, and as early as February in
greater Minnesota. Hail was observed with
thunderstorms in the Twin Cities on December 16,
2015, though no damage was observed. Damaging hail
in Hennepin County has been reported in November
and has occurred several times during October.
Average number severe hail days, 2003‐2012, from Storm Prediction
Center WCM Page.
4”+ hail reports in Minnesota, from DNR
State Climatology Office
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
99
4.3.4.7. Historical (statistical) data/previous occurrence
May 6, 1965: Most widespread, intense, and long‐lasting hail event on record in Twin Cities. Although
May 6, 1965, is best known for its devastating tornadoes in the Twin Cities, the storms also produced
destructive hail for an unusually long duration and over an unusually large area. Hail the size of ping
pong balls, golf balls, tennis balls and baseballs were
reported throughout the evening, in association with both
the tornadic storms and the many non‐tornadic
thunderstorms cells. The largest hail stones were reported
in Hennepin County, generally inside what is now the 494‐
694 corridor. Hail reports were received before the first
tornado confirmations, and well after even the last
suspected tornado, and the hail event lasted
approximately six hours. Many areas were hit by
tornadoes early in the evening, and destructive hail later
in the evening, and some locations were hit by three
distinct waves of hail larger than golf balls. Locations in
Hennepin County reporting golf ball or larger hail include
Minneapolis, Bloomington, St. Louis Park, New Hope,
Brooklyn Center, Maple Grove, Brooklyn Park, Edina,
Deephaven, Crystal, and Eden Prairie.
May 15, 1998: Derecho hailstorm
A severe squall line developed in western Texas around
midnight and raced northeastward, making it to south‐
central Kansas by daybreak, southwestern Iowa by mid‐
morning, and the Twin Cities area by 16:00 local time. The
storms produced widespread damaging wind along the
1000‐mile‐long track, and reached peak intensity in Iowa,
Minnesota, and Wisconsin, with fast‐moving tornadoes and 1‐2” hail driven by 60‐80 mph winds.
The storms produced a record number of power outages in Minnesota (the record has since been
broken twice), and snapped or uprooted hundreds of trees in Hennepin County alone (with estimates
of over 1000 trees killed in
Ramsey County). A tornado
tracked from Roseville into
Blaine, at an estimated speed of
80 mph, causing significant
damage to homes. Most of the
damages, however, were from
the hail, which broke windows,
damaged roofs, bent garage
doors, and forced automobile
dealerships in Bloomington to
submit claims for their entire
outdoor inventories.
Wind (blue), hail (green), and tornadoes
(red) reported on May 15, 1998. Generated
from Severe Plot 3.0 (see references).
Radar at 16:25 local, as bowing hail core entered central Twin Cities
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
100
The largest hail reported in the Twin Cities was 2 inches, and most reports were in the 1‐1.5” range.
However, the intense straight‐line winds turned the hail into dangerous projectiles, and produced far
more damage than would normally be expected.
August 6, 2013: The National Night Out Storm
On an evening when many Minnesotans were outside at neighborhood block parties, a powerful
supercell thunderstorm moved across central Minnesota into western Wisconsin, producing a large
swath of severe weather. Most reports were concentrated just south of the I‐94 corridor, and the storm
caused extensive damage to crops and vehicles.
The National Night Out storm had
less wind but somewhat larger hail
than the May 15, 1998, storm.
Winds were generally confined to
65 mph or less, but hail sizes were
typically 1.5 ‐ 2 inches in the core
of the storm, which covered the
southwestern third of Hennepin
County. Damage to roofs and
vehicles was common from Maple
Plain, through the Lake
Minnetonka area, into Eden Prairie
and Bloomington. Damages were
not quantified locally, but Aon‐
Benfield counted $1.25 billion in
damages from storms over the
northern and central US on August
5‐7, noting that Minnesota and
Wisconsin were hardest‐hit.
Radar and report‐based hail tracks. Source Minnesota State Climatology Office
Damage to squad car. Image courtesy Eden Prairie Police Department
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
101
An additional significant hail event occurred on August 11, 2023. However, that incident did not have as
high of impacts as the other events already described.
4.3.4.8. Future trends/likelihood of occurrence B1e
Research into hail frequencies in a changing climate has been somewhat limited, though modelling efforts
have suggested that the frequency of hail may decrease at the expense of more days with straight‐line
winds, because the atmosphere may favor higher instability but lower‐shear profiles as the equator‐to‐
pole temperature gradients weaken (Brooks 2013). Other research has suggested there may be fewer hail
days, but more significant events on the days with hail. The bottom line is that significant hailstorms, some
significant, are still to be expected into the future.
4.3.4.9. Indications and Forecasting
Like other severe weather hazards, national responsibility for hail monitoring and forecasting lies with the
National Weather Service’s Storm Prediction Center (SPC) in Norman, Oklahoma. The SPC uses three
different “products” that detail in anticipation of a severe weather event:
Convective Outlooks are spatial products that assign risk categories for severe weather and
quantify the varying risk for hail (and other hazards) each day, along with an explanation of the
basis for the risk categories assigned. Outlooks are issued for Day 1 (day of), and days 2‐8. Only
Day‐1 outlooks contain hail‐specific probabilities. “Day 1” outlooks are issued at 01:00, 08:00,
11:30, 15:00 and 20:00 (all times CDT). For Day 1, risk categories include Marginal, Slight,
Enhanced, Moderate, and High. These risk categories are assigned based on the probabilities of
severe weather (or a particular hazard) occurring with 25 miles of a point. (As shown in Table
4.3.4C)
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
102
Table 4.3.4C
Risk categories and probabilities are displayed on maps as color contours. The image below shows
the slight risk and probabilities of specific hazards at the 15:00 CDT outlook, just hours ahead of the
National Night Out storm.
SPC probabilistic risk table with corresponding outlook categories
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
103
Mesoscale Discussions (MDs) are used to identify a particular area of concern within a risk area,
often when storms have developed or are expected to, and to communicate the possibility that a
watch may be issued. The MD will be tagged with a statement of likelihood regarding the issuance
of a Watch, as follows:
Severe Potential…Watch Unlikely (5 or 20%)
Severe Potential…Watch Possible (40 or 60%)
Severe Potential…Watch likely (80 or 95%)
Severe Potential…Watch Needed Soon (95%)
MDs can also be used to communicate additional concerns or trends during an ongoing event. Like
Convective Outlooks, MDs are both graphical and textual. The following MD graphic was issued
after the 15:00 CDT Convective Outlook, in anticipation of a watch issuance.
Convective outlook (upper left), tornado (upper right), severe wind (lower left), and hail probabilities on
august 6, 2013. From SPC’s severe weather events database.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
104
Watches are issued when atmospheric conditions are favorable for the development of severe
weather. They are more geographically specific than Convective Outlooks, and they have defined
geographic boundaries, as well as start and end times. Typically, a watch will cover about 50,000
square miles‐‐slightly more than half the size of Minnesota‐‐and will last between 5 and 8 hours.
Tornado watches are used when conditions favor development of tornadoes, in addition to other
forms of severe weather. Severe thunderstorm watches are used when the tornado risk is
relatively low and hail or strong winds are expected. Large hail can be expected with both types
of watches, and neither connotes a greater or lesser risk of hail.
The National Night Out hail even was initially covered by a Tornado Watch, which was replaced by
a Severe Thunderstorm Watch after a few hours, when it became apparent there was not enough
low‐level moisture or shear to produce tornadoes, but plenty instability aloft and mid‐level shear
to produce large hail and strong winds. Below is the Severe Thunderstorm Watch outline with
radar overlay.
Mesoscale Discussion graphic issued in anticipation of National Night Out severe weather event
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
105
In addition to the SPC’s information and products, the local National Weather Service Forecast Office
issues a Hazardous Weather Outlook (HWO), generally 1‐2 times per day, as situations warrant, to share
thoughts about the potential for severe weather, including hail. These outlooks often discuss likely timing
and locations.
4.3.4.10. Detection & Warning
Local responsibility for detecting and warning citizens about severe hail lies with the National Weather
Service forecast office in Chanhassen. The primary means to communicate urgent storm location and
timing information is with Severe Thunderstorm and Tornado Warnings. These warnings indicate that
severe weather is imminent and will be affecting the warned area for a specified period of time. As with
watches, hail can be expected in both Severe Thunderstorm and Tornado Warnings, and neither is a better
indicator than the other of hail risk.
The NWS uses a combination of trained spotters and radar to detect severe hail. NWS Chanhassen has a
RADAR site for remote monitoring of hail‐containing storms‐‐the NEXRAD WSR‐88D in Chanhassen.
Numerous tools and algorithms enable NWS staff in Chanhassen to use this system for identification of
severe hail in thunderstorms.
Severe thunderstorm Watch outline with radar overlay on August 6, 2013
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
106
Spotter reports, reports from emergency managers, and increasingly, reports from social media also help
forecasters in Chanhassen assess the severity of ongoing storms.
4.3.4.11. Critical values and thresholds
The National Weather Service considers hail to be
severe if it equals or exceeds one inch in diameter.
The NWS will issue a severe thunderstorm warning
with a “Considerable” tag when hail is expected to
be 1.75 inch in diameter or greater or will issue a
severe thunderstorm warning with a “Destructive”
tag when hail is expected to be 2.75 inches in
diameter or greater which would trigger a Wireless
Emergency Alert for those in the warning area.
Because impact increases exponentially with
incremental increases in hail size, larger hailstones
pose a significantly greater risk to safety and
property. Therefore, spotters are trained to use
common objects to make estimates about the size
of hailstones. It should be noted that few hailstones
are ever measured. Instead, they are often
observed, compared to the common objects, and
then the size is inferred from the size of the stated
objects. Thus, reported hail sizes are almost always
crude estimates. Table 4.3.4D summarizes the
common objects used as hail size references, along
with the approximate diameter. The diameters, and
often not the common objects, will be preserved in
the Storm Events Database.
4.3.4.12. Prevention
Hailstorms cannot at present be prevented and should be considered an occasional risk within Hennepin
County.
4.3.4.13. Mitigation
The risks of being killed or injured by hail are
greatest when hail is very large and/or wind driven. Thus, awareness of conditions that could lead to severe
weather and hail, and having a plan of retreat if storms approach is of primary importance.
As with all storms, the safest place to be when it’s hailing is inside, in a sturdy structure, away from
windows. Even though cars often lose windows and contain some flying glass, they may be safer than
being outside, if the travel distance to the vehicle is reasonable. If no shelter or vehicle is available, retreat
to lower ground, if possible, stay away from trees, which pose a lightning risk, and by covering the head
to avoid potentially lethal impacts from large hail.
Hailstone size comparisons of commonly reported
reference objects.
Table 4.3.4D
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
107
On the road, many drivers make choices that ultimately compromise the safety of other motorists. Driving
into hail at highway speeds increases a hailstone’s momentum (and therefore impact) substantially. Thus,
if it begins hailing while driving, slow down and look for potential shelter options off the road. There may
be none, but slowing down will reduce the impact of hail to the vehicle, reducing the risk for damage, and
potential injury from shattered glass. If slowing down does not adequately reduce the risks, pull
completely off the road, never under an overpass, and stop.
4.3.4.14. References
Aon‐Benfield, August 2013 Global Catastrophe Recap,
http://thoughtleadership.aonbenfield.com/Documents/20130904_if_august_global_recap.pdf
Brooks, H. E., 2013: Severe thunderstorms and climate change. Atmos. Res., 123, 129–138.
Changnon, S. A., D. Changnon, and S. Hilberg, 2009: Hailstorms across the nation. Illinois State Water
Survey, Champaign, IL,
Doswell, C. A., H. E. Brooks, and M. P. Kay, 2005: Climatological Estimates of Daily Local Nontornadic
Severe Thunderstorm Probability for the United States. Wea. Forecasting Weather and
Forecasting, 20, 577–595, doi:10.1175/waf866.1.
Hail Basics. NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory,
http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/education/svrwx101/hail/ (Accessed February 25, 2016).
Hail Size as Related to Objects (Storm Prediction Center),
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/misc/tables/hailsize.htm (Accessed February 25, 2016).
Marshall, T.P., R. Herzog, S. Morrison, and S. Smith. 2002. Hail Damage Threshold Sizes for Common
Roofing and Siding Materials. 21st Conf.Severe Local Storms. American Meteorological Society.
Minnesota DNR, National Night Out Storm: August 6, 2013.
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/130806_national_night_out_storm.html
NCDC, Storm data and unusual weather phenomena with late reports and corrections: May 1998,
volume 40.
NCDC, Storm Events Database: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/
NOAA/NWS, JetStream ‐ Thunderstorm Hazards: Hail
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/jetstream/tstorms/hail.htm
Storm Prediction Center, National Severe Weather Database Browser (Online SeverePlot 3.0),
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/sp3/plot.php
Storm Prediction Center (SPC), Storm Prediction Center WCM Page, http://www.spc.noaa.gov/wcm/
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
108
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
109
4.3.5. Hazard Assessment: LIGHTNING
4.3.5.1. Definition
Lightning is one of the oldest observed natural
phenomena on earth. It has been seen in volcanic
eruptions, extremely intense forest fires, surface nuclear
detonations, heavy snowstorms, in large hurricanes, and
most commonly, thunderstorms. Lightning is essentially
an electrical current where electrostatic discharges
between the cloud and the ground, other clouds, within a
cloud, or with the air. Within a thunderstorm, many small
bits of ice (frozen raindrops) bump into each other as they
move around in the air. Those collisions create an electric charge. The positive charges, or protons, form
at the top of the cloud and the negative charges, or electrons, form at the bottom of the cloud. Since
opposites attract, that causes a positive charge to build up on the ground beneath the cloud. The ground’s
electrical charge concentrates around anything that sticks up, such as metal conductors, tall buildings,
people, or trees. The positive charge coming up from these points eventually connects with the negative
charge reaching down from the clouds, and that is when you see the lightning strike.
4.3.5.2. Range of Magnitude
The magnitude of lightning is incredibly variable from storm to storm. Typically, when discussing
magnitude of lighting, one is concerned mostly with lighting strikes that hit the ground. GRAPHICS 4.3.5A
and 4.3.5B are using data from the National Climatic Data Center, which show the reported costs from
lightning for the past 10 years.
GRAPHIC 4.3.5A
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
$
Total Damage Cost from Lightning Per Year: Nation Wide
10 Year Average = $51 Million
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
110
GRAPHIC 4.3.5B
4.3.5.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
Lightning strikes are the leading causes of wildfires and have been responsible in the past for some of the
most devastating fires in the southwest United States. According to Storm Data, Minnesota ranks 28th in
the United States in lightning deaths from 1959‐2012. Lightning is not only a threat to public safety, but
also a threat for public and private structures because of the large number of structural fires started from
lightning each year. Lightning can have direct and/or indirect effect, depending on whether it strikes a
structure directly or not. The effects depend greatly on the conductivity of the materials the electricity
travels through.
Material Consequence
Electrical Electrical voltages created by electrical discharges dissipated in the ground
that is struck by lightning.
Thermal Substantial damage and injuries from fires, burns, and destruction caused by
a major release of heat.
Electrodynamic Forces of attraction occur between parallel conductors that are traversed by
currents in the same direction create mechanical stresses and strain.
Electromagnetic
The lightning current induces extremely high voltage and an extremely strong
electromagnetic field that generate very powerful electric pulses that can
damage sensitive electronic devices.
Electrochemical Corrosion due to currents circulating through buried conductors
Acoustic (Thunder and Windowpanes can be shattered a few meters from the point of impact.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
$
Total Damage Cost from Lightning Per Year: Minnesota
10 Year Average = 1.21
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
111
Pressure Waves)
Physiological
From simple dazzling to being struck dead by lightning, with a range of effects
in between: Nervous shocks, various forms of blindness, deafness, blacking
out, and momentary or prolonged comas.
A common misconception of people being killed from lightning is because they were struck. Most lightning
injuries and deaths are causes by mechanisms other than direct lightning strikes. Only 3‐5% of lightning
strike victims take a direct strike. 3‐5% of lightning victims are contact injuries where the person is
touching or holding an object to which lightning attaches, such as indoor wired telephones or plumbing
that transmits current to the person. 30‐35% of injuries are caused by a side flash, also called splash. Side
flashes occur when lightning hits an object such as tree or building and travels partly down that object
before a portion jump to a nearby victim. Most injury (50‐55%) come from ground current. Ground
current arises because the earth is not a perfect conductor. Ground current effects are more likely to be
temporary, slight, and less likely to produce fatalities. However multiple victims and injuries are more
frequent from ground current. Another 10‐15% of injury occur from upward leaders. Upward leaders are
upward discharges of lightning, which almost always occur from towers, tall buildings, or mountain tops.
A direct consequence to the body is an intense shock can severe impair most of the body’s vital functions.
Cardiac arrest is common. Commonly when there is a strike that affects the heart directly, there is a
massive shutdown. With every beat the heart depolarizes and changes its electrical signal. In addition,
people can develop problems days, weeks, or months after being struck or being close to a lightning strike.
4.3.5.4. Potential for Cascading Effects
Lightning strikes that hit the ground, called cloud to ground strikes, can have a vast array of consequences.
One of the most common cascading events is when a lightning strike causes a fire to start, which can then
spread to homes, or produce wildland fire. Another consequence would be if lightning strikes a
transformer and people are without power for days, those people could be at risk for heat illnesses if hot
and humid conditions persist.
When lightning strikes a building, transients are generated on adjacent power, data, telephone and/or RF
lines. As these transients pass through electronic equipment on their way to earth, they can cause both
immediate damage and longer‐term component degradation. However, the problem goes far beyond a
direct strike. Today our electronic systems are intrinsically connected to the outside world, not only by
mains power cables, but also through data and telephone lines, RF feeders, etc. Transient over voltages
from lightning activity up to 1 km away can destroy equipment inside a building, even when the building
itself has not been struck. As transients can be induced onto any conductive cable‐overhead or
underground, the power, data, telephone, or RF lines leaving a building to join the main network or even
running between buildings can provide a way in for transients looking for a path to earth. Lightning simply
striking the ground, or even cloud‐to‐cloud lightning, induces a transient overvoltage on those cables,
allowing access directly into the electronic heart of that theoretically protected building. The following is
a list of possible secondary consequences following a lightning event.
Downtime and disruption
Hardware damage
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
112
Software corruption
Data loss
Lost production
4.3.5.5. Geographic Scope of Hazard B1c
As mentioned, lightning is one of the oldest observed natural phenomena on earth and has been seen in
many different types of natural phenomena. This means lightning occurs across the world, including the
United States, and of course, Minnesota. Individual lightning strikes are relatively small in geographic
scope. However, when an area has a storm filled with lightning, or multiple storms filled with lightning,
you can have a large geographic area being affected all at the same time. Graphic 4.3.5C shows Flash
Density map from Vaisala which shows the flashes per square mile per year for the entire United States.
Graphic 4.3.5C
4.3.5.6. Chronologic Patterns
Lightning can happen any time of year, however it is more prominent with spring and summer months as
this is when most of the convective weather occurs.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
113
4.3.5.7. Historical Data B1d
Lightning is a usual occurrence in thunderstorms across the State and Hennepin County each year. Every
year, about four percent of Minnesota structural fires are caused by natural events, one can infer these
natural events to be lightning related. The National Climatic Data Center states that there have been
$700,000 dollars in damage and 6 injuries due to lightning strikes in Hennepin County since August of
1995. From 1959‐2014, Minnesota has had 64 lightning fatalities in the state.
Historically, data shows us that leisure‐related activities are the greatest source of lightning fatalities.
From a study that looked at lightning deaths from 2006 through 2013, fishing contributed to the most
lightning deaths with 11% of all deaths.
See GRAPHIC 4.3.5D for the top 11 activities that contributed most the lightning deaths during this period.
This is consistent with a study that was published in 1999 that looked at lightning casualties and damages
from 1959 to 1994 in the United States.
There have been are no other lightning related incidents that are within the scope of this plan.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
114
GRAPHIC 4.3.5D Lightning Fatalities
4.3.5.8. Future Trends B1e
Some studies have shown changes in lightning associated with seasonal or year‐to‐year variations in
temperature, but there have not been any reliable studies conducted to indicate future trends of
occurrence until recently. A study looked at two variables, precipitation, and cloud buoyancy and how
they might be a predictor of lightning (see more in the indications and forecasting section for predicting
and forecasting lightning). The scientists found that on average, climate models predict a 12 percent rise
in cloud‐to‐ground lightning strikes per temperature degree increase in the contiguous U.S. This is roughly
a 50 percent increase by year 2100 if earth continues to see the expected seven‐degree Fahrenheit
increase in temperature. While this is a step into looking into the future trends of lightning as our climate
continues to change, less is known about the exact locations on where strikes will increase.
4.3.5.9. Indications and Forecasting
“Lightning is caused by the charge separation within clouds, and to maximize separation, you have to lift
more water vapor and heavy ice particles into the atmosphere” (Romps, 2014). It is known that the faster
the updrafts, the more lighting, in addition, the more precipitation, the more lighting. How fast the updraft
of the convective clouds is determined by the convective available potential energy (CAPE) which is
measured by radiosondes, balloon‐borne instruments, released by each weather forecast office (WFO)
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
115
twice a day. CAPE is essentially how potentially explosive the atmosphere is. In essence, where forecasters
see high CAPE values, and high‐water vapor content in the atmosphere is where expected lightning and
thunderstorms are to occur.
4.3.5.10. Detection & Warning
Currently, there are no official alert or warning products that are issued by the National Weather Service
for just lightning. There are, however, certain programs that can be used that have lightning detection.
One of the leading lightning detection companies across the United States is Vaisala. Vaisala’s Global
Lightning Dataset was first launched in September 2009. However, currently there is no way to receive
lightning detection data from Vaisala, or other detection sources, without a paid subscription to a specific
service. There are also very few, if any, sources that will give you the distinction between cloud to ground
lightning, intra‐cloud, and cloud to air lightning, partly because the science is just starting to understand
how to detect the difference. Hennepin County has installed lightning sensors at select mesonet stations
in the Hennepin West Mesonet network which detect lightning strikes within a 20‐mile radius. These
sensors can provide some information on how close lightning is to cities in Hennepin County.
4.3.5.11. Critical Values and Thresholds
Although there are not watches or warnings for lightning, by using the detection services that available,
one can watch how lighting within a storm is changing. In general, if lightning activity is increasing within
a storm, one can infer that the storm is strengthening. If lighting activity is decreasing, one can infer that
the storm is weakening.
4.3.5.12. Prevention
You cannot prevent lightning from occurring, but you can prevent some of the consequences by being
aware of when thunderstorms are forecasted as well as being aware of the potential cascading
consequences that can accompany the lightning. If a person sees lightning or hears thunder, they should
go inside immediately.
4.3.5.13. Mitigation
While there is no way to prevent lightning from happening, there are mitigation strategies to help protect
from the effects of lightning. First is protecting critical facilities and equipment by installing protection
devices such as lightning rods and grounding on communications infrastructure, electronic equipment,
and other critical facilities. Another way to mitigate for lightning is through educational and awareness
programs. Developing brochures to hand out at festivals, or with monthly water bills is one of the popular
strategies. Additionally, teaching schoolchildren about the dangers of lightning and how to take safety
precautions is another way to reach the parents at home as well.
4.3.5.14. Response
Quick response when it comes to effects from lightning is crucial. When someone is struck or is affected
by a near strike, ground current, first aid and CPR is crucial. However, CPR must continue for a long time
because it takes a long time for the heart to beat again, the diaphragm to function, and even longer for
the brain to reboot and control vital organ functions. People who go into cardiac arrest from
lightning have a 75 percent mortality rate. Quick response is also needed when lighting causes a fire.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
116
Whether it is a structure fire or grass/wildland fire, the more spread, the more damage. Please see the
Wildland Fire section of this hazard assessment for more information about response.
4.3.5.15. Recovery
Assessing the damage is the first part of the recovery process. People who are victims of a strike or near
strike ay not ever fully recovery and may continue to have issues the rest of their lives. However, the faster
the treatment they can get immediately, the faster recovery they will see.
4.3.5.16. References
Holle, Ronald L. 2012. 'Recent Studies of Lightning Safety and Demographics'. 2012 International
Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP). doi:10.1109/iclp.2012.6344218.
Jensenius Jr., John. 2014. 'A Detailed Analysis of Lightning Deaths in the United States from 2006
through 2013'. National Weather Service Executive Summary.
López, Raúl, and Ronald Holle. 1995. 'Demographics of Lightning Casualties'. Seminars in Neurology 15
(03): 286‐295. doi:10.1055/s‐2008‐1041034.
Romps, D. M., J. T. Seeley, D. Vollaro, and J. Molinari. 2014. 'Projected Increase In Lightning Strikes In
The United States Due To Global Warming'. Science 346 (6211): 851‐854.
doi:10.1126/science.1259100.
Vaisala.com. 2015. 'Vaisala ‐ A Global Leader in Environmental and Industrial Measurement'.
http://www.vaisala.com/en/Pages/default.aspx.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
117
4.3.6. Hazard Assessment: RAINFALL, EXTREME
4.3.6.1. Definition
Extreme rainfall leads to flash
flooding, infrastructural and
property damage, and even loss
of life. Although the definition
varies by application, extreme
rainfall events are generally
understood to have rates that
meet or exceed a given
threshold, often tied to storage
or drainage capacity.
Virtually all extreme rainfall
events in Minnesota are
associated with thunderstorms.
Short‐duration extreme events,
in which an unusually large
quantity of rain falls in a short
amount of time (for example,
3 inches falling in one hour) are often associated with severe supercell thunderstorms, squall lines, and
mesoscale convective systems. Long‐duration events more than six hours tend to occur in environments
favorable for strong thunderstorms, but not favorable for sustained severe weather. In these situations,
there is often a stationary boundary allowing regenerating thunderstorms to pass over the same locations,
in a process known as “training.”
In forecasting applications, extreme rainfall drives the issuance of National Weather Service flash‐flood
products based on “flash‐flood guidance,” which is a changing, location‐dependent value that utilizes
pre‐existing soil moisture and land cover conditions. Unsaturated soils and ample vegetation require
higher precipitation rates to trigger flash‐flooding than saturated soils, denuded vegetation, or impervious
surfaces.
Extreme rainfall also is critical to hydrologic design of roads, trails, culverts, retention and detention ponds,
dams, and other types of infrastructure. Engineers and planners design these facilities to withstand all but
some small percentage of all heavy rainfall events. For instance, many non‐critical features like small roads
and trails are designed to withstand a storm that has a 10% probability in any given year (also known as
the 10‐year storm). More critical features will often be designed for 100‐year rainfall events‐‐those that
have a 1% probability in any given year. NOAA Atlas 14 contains the most recent scientific estimates of
rainfall amounts for durations from 5 minutes to 60 days, and with recurrence intervals of 1 through
500‐years.
Cars stranded on I-35 in south Minneapolis after excessive 1-hour rains fell on
July 1, 1997.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
118
4.3.6.2. Range of magnitude
Maximum Rainfall Amounts Observed in Twin Cities, Hennepin County and Minnesota
Rainfall duration Hennepin County Minnesota
24 hours Official: 10.00 inches, MSP July
23‐24, 1987
Unofficial: 12.75 inches,
Bloomington, July 23‐24, 1987
Official: 15.10 inches, Hokah,
Aug 18‐19, 2007
Unofficial, La Crescent, 17.21
inches, August 18‐19, 2007
5‐day 13.80” MSP, July 20‐24, 1987 17.45 inches, Hokah, August 18‐
22, 2007
Monthly 17.90 inches, MSP, July 1987 23.86 inches, Hokah, August
2007
4.3.6.3. Spectrum of consequences (damage scale, common impacts and disruptions, response needs)
B2b
The most dangerous result of extreme rainfall is flash flooding, which has numerous consequences, arises
from a combination of factors, and is covered in greater depth as its own chapter within this assessment.
Other severe hazards are not related to directly flooding. Following is a brief annotated list of common
consequences resulting from extreme rainfall:
● Injury, drowning, death: those unable to get to higher ground, and those stuck in vehicles that
either failed to navigate or are unaware of high water are at significant risk. Flooded roads,
particularly at night, are especially dangerous.
● Infrastructure damage: roads, culverts, drainage basins, bridges, and even dams can succumb to
the direct force of heavy flowing water, and to erosion from the ground below. Sewer and
wastewater systems may overflow.
● Stalled, stranded, or damaged vehicles. Many vehicle batteries die in high water, causing vehicles
to stall. Parked vehicles in low‐lying areas may also be inundated and stranded. Water frequently
gets inside the vehicles, damaging the electronics and the interior.
● Structural failure: eroding soils from a heavy rain may undermine the structural integrity of houses
and buildings, resulting in complete or partial collapse.
● Water damage. Water enters sub‐grade floors through small openings and in extreme events can
accumulate to inches or even feet on the lowest levels, as municipal sewer systems exceed
capacity and water backs up into residential lines. Electrical equipment becomes susceptible to
damage, and interior materials may be compromised and may develop dangerous mold or mildew.
● Crop damage: it is common for major extreme rainfall events to damage agricultural fields, often
wiping out an entire season’s worth of crops.
● Water quality: extreme rainfall washes high level of compounds into area waterways, which may
exceed allowable contaminant thresholds for days or even weeks after a major event.
● Recreational loss: extreme rainfall events target the lowest areas first, meaning that lakes and
rivers are susceptible to overflow. No‐wake laws impede water sports, and overflowing streams
and rivers can produce dangerous conditions for canoeing and other human‐powered water
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
119
activities. Trails and paths near lakes and rivers are often flooded, preventing bicycling, jogging,
and walking. Recreational departments will require extra labor hours to return recreational
resources to proper working conditions.
4.3.6.4. Potential for cascading effects
Most cascading effects associated with extreme rainfall are identical to those associated with flash‐
flooding and urban flooding.
Extreme rainfall hazards can easily be compounded by other pre‐existing hazards, as well as hazards that
develop after an event. In many cases, extreme rainfall‐‐especially of shorter durations‐‐occurs with severe
supercell thunderstorms, squall lines, and mesoscale convective systems. Almost by definition, these
systems are multi‐hazard events. Thus, straight‐line downburst winds, large hail, tornadoes, and frequent
lightning are often associated with the same storms that produce extreme rainfall rates. Power may be
out, which complicates efforts to remove water using sump pumps. This was the case in June of 2013,
following a major wind event in the Twin Cities. The July 23‐24 super storm produced record‐setting and
basement‐inundating rainfall from storms that also produced heavy damage from tornadoes. There were
instances during the evening in which tornado warnings and Flash‐Flood warnings were in effect for the
same area simultaneously. Seeking shelter in a basement posed flood‐related risks.
Extreme rainfall also can play a role in tree mortality, and associated damages to public sidewalks, personal
property, and electrical systems. On June 21, 2013, a major tree fall event that was also the largest
weather‐related power outage in state history, resulted not just from the prolonged downburst winds, but
also from intense rains that fell both earlier in the day, and during the storm. Though the winds were 50‐
60 mph with some higher gusts for over 10 minutes in many places, they produced far more damage than
would be expected at those speeds. The severity of tree damage likely resulted from the saturated soils,
which provided less resistance than normal, allowing trees to become “loose” and eventually topple.
Whether short or prolonged in duration, extreme rainfall is often associated with summerlike air masses.
Thus, extreme rainfall may occur before, during, or after an extreme heat event. Similarly, extreme rainfall
can occur during drought conditions, as was the case in 1987.
Additional specific cases of high‐impact multi‐hazard extreme rainfall events will be outlined in the
Historical (statistical) data/previous occurrence section.
4.3.6.5. Geographic scope of hazard B1c
Extreme rainfall rates may cover between 50 and 1500 square miles at a time. After accounting for
movement, the total area affected by rainfall more than 3 inches may cover thousands of square miles,
with hundreds of square miles receiving over six inches of rain. In exceptionally rare cases, 6‐inch rainfall
totals may cover an area greater than 1,000 square miles‐‐approximately the size of two Twin Cities area
counties. The Minnesota State Climatology Office has documented 12 of these “mega” rainfall events in
Minnesota since the mid‐1800s. These events are always associated with catastrophic damage and often
loss of life.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
120
4.3.6.6. Chronologic patterns (seasons, cycles, rhythm)
Extreme rainfall has been observed from April through November, but peak probabilities are generally
from June through August, and to a lesser extent, September. The frequency of 3 and 4‐inch rainfall peaks
during July.
Graphic of 2, 3, and 4‐inch daily rainfall totals in Minneapolis since 1871.
Like other convective weather hazards, extreme rainfall goes through more and less active periods.
Hennepin County has at times gone many years between major events. 2014, 2002, and 1997, on the
other hand, are relatively recent examples of years with multiple extreme events in the county.
4.3.6.7. Historical (statistical) data/previous occurrence B1d
NOAA Atlas 14 is the definitive source for extreme rainfall estimates and contains the most recent scientific
estimates of rainfall amounts for durations from 5 minutes to 60 days, and with recurrence intervals of 1
through 500‐years. The following table is for a point selected in central Hennepin County. The top row
contains recurrence intervals (or return periods), and the left column is storm durations. The value in bold
where they intersect is the likely amount in inches expected for a storm of that duration, at that recurrence
interval. The values in parentheses represent the 90% confidence range around the bold value Example:
For 24‐hour rainfall at a 100‐year recurrence interval is estimated to be 7.34 inches, and is 90% likely to
be between 5.55, and 9.65 inches.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
121
TABLE 4.3.6A is derived from a statistical technique that utilizes data from multiple stations and is based
on observations.
TABLE 4.3.6A Precipitation frequency estimates for a point in central Hennepin County
The 100‐year recurrence value for 24‐hour rainfall is the most frequently cited value, and indeed, many
structure are designed for such an event. It is, however, important to note that shorter durations of
excessive rainfall can also overwhelm systems, and many have therefore been designed for 1, 3, or 6‐hour
thresholds. Structural, civil, and hydrological engineers can provide further information on exceedance
thresholds used for infrastructure elements. Additionally, heavy rainfall over longer durations can
overwhelm systems, even when exceptional hourly rainfall rates are lacking.
Extreme rainfall, therefore, should be anticipated on a variety of timescales, and not just measured by
daily or 24‐hour rainfall only. Radar estimates and automated rain gauges help forecasters understand
rainfall quantities for shorter and longer durations, and noteworthy rainfall events of many duration‐
magnitude combinations have affected Hennepin County.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
122
July 23‐24, 1987, Super Storm
The heaviest rainfall ever officially recorded at a Twin Cities weather station fell between about
18:00 CDT on 23 July and about 02:00 CDT on 24 July 1987. During this eight‐hour interval,
observers at the Twin Cities International airport station measured an even ten inches of rain (9.15
inches of which fell in a five‐hour period). In addition to the heavy rainfall, the 23‐24 July storm
spawned an F3 tornado near Goose Lake in Hennepin County and produced extensive damage in
Maple Grove and Brooklyn Park. Damage in other areas was extensive, largely the result of flooded
homes and businesses, ruptured storm sewers, and washed out or inundated streets and
highways. Two flood related deaths were reported, and property damage was estimated to be in
excess of $30 million (1987 dollars).
The 23‐24 July storms occurred along an outflow boundary that had separated extremely warm,
moist air to the south and east and much cooler, drier air immediately to the north and west. The
interaction of these air masses produced intense thunderstorms with extremely heavy rainfall
over the southwestern portion of the Twin Cities on 20‐21 July 1987, two days prior to the 23‐24
July outbreak. Rainfall amounts during this event included 3.83 inches at the Twin Cities airport
station, 9.75 inches near Shakopee and 7.83 inches at the neighboring community of Chaska.
The 23‐24 and 20‐21 July storms, together with the rainfall produced by thunderstorms earlier
and later in the month, brought unprecedented July rainfall to the Twin Cities area.
The International airport station recorded 17.91 inches, approximately six times the July normal.
An unofficial monthly total of 19.27 inches was recorded in west Bloomington.
Ironically, July 1987's excessive rainfall came in the middle of a prolonged period of subnormal
precipitation. Precipitation had been below normal for every month from October 1986 through
June 1987 and, following about six weeks of wet weather in July‐August 1987, the drought
returned. Extreme dryness prevailed during much of the ensuing year with a near record dry June
and record warmth during the summer of 1988.
July 1, 1997, Derecho and Flood
An intense mesoscale system containing supercells and a fast‐moving squall line tore through the
central and northern Twin Cities area during the evening, producing extensive wind damage and
catastrophic flooding. Numerous tornadoes rated up to F3, were reported from the Willmar area,
through Wright and Sherburne Counties. Non‐tornadic winds more than 100 mph knocked out
power, severely damaged structures, and snapped and uprooted trees in Wright, Anoka,
Sherburne, and northern Hennepin counties.
As the storm complex moved into the central portions of the Twin Cities, it produced some of the
heaviest one‐hour rainfall ever measured in Minnesota. 3‐4 inches fell within one hour over the
central and eastern parts of Hennepin County, as well as adjacent portions of Ramsey and Anoka
counties. I‐35 and I‐94 were closed south of downtown Minneapolis and standing water more
than 10 feet in some areas prompted boat rescues in south Minneapolis and Richfield. Edison High
School in northeast Minneapolis sustained major flood damage, and hundreds of homes and
residential complexes were severely damaged by inundation.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
123
Late May through June 2014 ‐ repeated/persistent heavy rainfall events
A persistently wet pattern punctuated by
numerous heavy rainfall events during June
2014 led to significant flooding and
estimates of approximately $12 million in
damage throughout Hennepin County. The
greatest impacts tended to be focused near
water bodies and low‐lying areas.
Numerous stations in Minnesota reported
record monthly rainfall for June.
May 31‐ June 2: 2‐4 inches of rainfall was
common over the county, with 4.3”
reported at Flying Cloud. This was part of a
nearly statewide heavy rainfall event. Lake
Minnetonka rose to its highest levels in 109
years following this event.
June 6‐8: A scattered rainfall event, with up
to 2 inches in western Hennepin County,
and an isolated 3‐inch report near
Independence.
June 14‐16: 2‐3 inches throughout the county. Levels began rising rapidly along many waterways.
June 18: Isolated reports of up to 1 inch in association with a major event concentrated over
southern MN, and in advance of the more significant event on the following day.
June 19: Major, long‐duration intense rainfall event, with waves of heavy precipitation throughout
the day. Flooding became common and widespread. 3‐5 inches were common throughout the
county, with 4.13 reported at MSP—the heaviest daily total since October 2005. 5.47” was
reported by CoCoRaHS in Eden Prairie. Seven‐day rainfall amounts of 4‐8 inches were common
across the county, with even more to the south and west.
Municipalities, school districts, and other public interests within Hennepin County reported losses
and expenses more than $12 million USD (2014). The following list is not exhaustive, but rather
representative of the scale and impact of damage from the excessive rainfall.
Bloomington, $265‐270k: parkland damage; destruction of warming house
Eden Prairie, $360‐370k: pipe ruptures damage to Duck Lake Trail, Eden Prairie Road,
recreational trails, sewers, and banks of Riley Creek
Golden Valley, $90‐95k: unspecified damages to roads, sewers, culverts
Greenfield, $20‐25k: roads, sewers
Hennepin County Sheriff's Office, $26k: water patrol docks and one boat damaged.
Hopkins School District, $5k: washouts at High School, West Jr. High, Gatewood
Elementary, and Eisenhower
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
124
Minneapolis Park Board, $6.8M: Mudslide behind Fairview‐Riverside affecting 100' x 250'
slope and exposing facility oxygen tanks and require extensive re‐engineering and
restoration.
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, $180k: Lake Minnetonka reached record high water
mark of 931.11 feet, and Minnehaha creek exceeded 100‐year flow at Hiawatha (with 893
cu ft.). The entire creek watershed was severely impacted, as were many of the MCWD's
capital projects.
Minnetonka, $55k: unspecified damages to municipal property
Minnetonka Independent School District, $NA: Destruction/failure of retaining wall at
high school.
Mound, $1M: unspecified damages to streets, culverts, sewers, parks, and infrastructure
Orono, $150k: severe damage to Starkey Road and Balder Park Road
Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, $3.6M: Drainage system destroyed; sunken grade
creating sinkhole risk; low‐lying electrical circuitry inundated and damaged, pumping,
sandbagging and dewatering required; barriers construction.
Richfield, $70‐75k: Power failure at sanitary lift station, damage to pumps, trails and paths
inundated, littered with debris, and damaged.
St. Louis Park, $50‐55k: severe damage on Louisiana Ave
Wayzata, $70‐75k: city marina flooded and damaged; culverts damaged, requiring
emergency repairs.
August 18‐20, 2007 ‐ worst
rainfall event on record in MN
Perhaps the most extraordinary
precipitation event in
Minnesota's modern history
shattered Minnesota’s 24‐hour
rainfall record. The 15.10" total
recorded at 8:00 AM on Sunday,
August 19, 2007, near Hokah in
Houston County is the largest
24‐hour rainfall total ever
measured at an official National
Weather Service observing
station in Minnesota, breaking
the old record of 10.84 inches
by an astonishing 39%.
The storm also obliterated the state’s “unofficial” rainfall record, when a non‐National Weather
Service rainfall observer near La Crescent (Houston County) reported 17.21 inches for the 24‐hour
period ending 7:00 AM, Sunday, August 19. This is the largest 24‐hour value in the Minnesota State
Climatology Office database and broke the previous statewide non‐NWS observer record 12.75”
by a margin of 35%. Both new records far exceeded expected totals, even for record‐breaking
events, and are so large, a true return period estimation is virtually impossible.
Rainfall totals for entire 3-day rainfall event in southern Minnesota in
august of 2007. In most areas, 80-90% of the totals came within the
first 24 hours of the event.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
125
The rainfall was caused by a series of strong
thunderstorms moving along a stalled frontal
boundary for an unusually long time. The most
intense precipitation rates occurred during the
afternoon and evening hours of Saturday, August
18, and the early morning hours of Sunday, August
19. Over the course of the event, all or portions of
28 counties received at least four inches of rain. Six‐
inch totals were common across the region, and
portions of southeastern Minnesota reported
three‐day totals ranging from 8 to 20 inches. The
heaviest rainfall reports came from Winona,
Fillmore, and Houston counties, where 36‐hour
totals exceeded 14 inches. The largest multi‐day
rainfall total reported (through Monday, August 20)
was 20.85 inches observed near the town of
Houston in northern Houston County.
The deluge produced flooding tied to seven fatalities. Major flood damage occurred in many
southeastern Minnesota communities. Hundreds of homes and businesses were impacted.
Reports of stream flooding, urban flooding, mudslides, and road closures were numerous
throughout southern Minnesota.
The combination of huge rainfall totals and a very large geographic extent, make this an
extraordinary episode. The area receiving six or more inches during a 24‐hour period during this
torrent encompassed thousands of square miles‐ the largest such area known to the Minnesota
State Climatology Office.
There have been no other incidents that are within the scope of this plan.
Damaging mudslide near Hokah. Courtesy of
NWS-La Crosse
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
126
4.3.6.8. Future trends/likelihood of occurrence B1e
The 2023 National Climate Assessment indicates that winter and spring precipitation is expected to
increase, while summer and fall precipitation will be more variable (NCA5, 2023). By mid‐century (2041‐
2070), the latest science suggests that
rainfall events that would ranking in
the top 2% for the period 1981‐2010,
will become more common. Most of
Minnesota can expect, on average, an
additional day per year with these
events, which amounts to an
approximate doubling in frequency.
4.3.6.9. Indications and Forecasting
The Chanhassen Office of the National
Weather Service is the local authority
for extreme rainfall monitoring and
forecasting, and uses flash flood
guidance, based on soil moisture and
land cover conditions, to evaluate whether expected and/or ongoing heavy rainfall poses a significant
flooding risk. Additionally, NOAA’s Weather Prediction Center (WPC) has a legacy of advanced hydro‐
meteorological monitoring and prediction and offers Excessive Rainfall Outlooks and Mesoscale
Precipitation Discussions that are comparable to the severe weather products offered by the Storm
Prediction Center. Unlike the Storm Prediction Center, however, the WPC does not issue Watches of any
sort.
Forecasters monitor and analyze numerical weather models and other predictive tools to ascertain
potential extreme rainfall and associated flash flooding threats. The following sequence of
products may then be used in an idealized situation, though it should be noted that extreme
rainfall threats may appear of disappear at any step in this timeline:
4+ days out: Chanhassen NWS Office highlights threat for heavy or extreme rainfall and flash flooding
potential in Hazardous Weather Outlook products.
1‐3 days out: WPC issues Excessive Rainfall Outlook, indicating Marginal, Slight, Moderate, or High Risk of
excessive rainfall, according to the following probabilities:
Additional days per year with upper 2% rainfall events by mid-century
(2041-2071). Source, 2014 National Climate Assessment, Midwest Chapter.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
127
Risk Category Probability of Rainfall
Exceeding Flash Flood
Guidance at a Point
Marginal (MRGL) 2‐5%
Slight (SLGT) 5‐10%
Moderate (MDT) 10‐15%
High (HIGH) >15%
Current/valid Excessive Rainfall Outlooks can be found at: http://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov /qpf/ excess
_rain.shtml
Within 48 hours: Chanhassen NWS Office issues Flash Flood Watch, based on combination of expected
precipitation and local Flash Flood Guidance values.
→ Important: In early spring 2018, the NWS will no longer use Flash Flood Watches, and will
instead consolidate them into generic Flood Watches, as part of its Hazard Simplification
process: https://www.weather.gov/news/170307‐hazard‐simplification
Within 1‐6 hours: WPC issues Mesoscale Precipitation Discussion to highlight emerging flooding potential
from expected, developing, or ongoing thunderstorm and rainfall activity. These discussions are only used
for large areas of concern (generally the size of 25 or more Minnesota counties) and do not pertain to
highly localized extreme events.
Each discussion includes an annotated graphic indicating the area of concern, and a brief text discussion
focused on the mesoscale features supporting the anticipated heavy rainfall. The potential for flash
flooding within the area of concern will be highlighted by one of three headlines:
FLASH FLOODING LIKELY High confidence exists that environmental conditions are favorable, or
will become favorable, for heavy rainfall that will result in flash flooding.
FLASH FLOODING POSSIBLE Environmental conditions are favorable, or will become favorable, for
heavy rainfall, but there are questions about how the event will evolve and/or whether flash
flooding will occur.
FLASH FLOODING UNLIKELY High confidence exists that environmental conditions are
unfavorable, or will become unfavorable, for heavy rainfall that will result in flash flooding.
Once event has begun: Chanhassen NWS Office issues Flash Flood Warning, based on combination of
precipitation received, further precipitation expected, soil conditions, and stream levels and flow. A Flash
Flood Warning is issued when flash flooding is occurring or is imminent. These warnings differ from Severe
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
128
Thunderstorm and Tornado warnings, in that they are not issued in advance of the parent thunderstorm(s),
but instead after the storm has begun, ideally in advance of the flash‐flooding itself. The behavior of
approaching storms is erratic enough that pre‐storm lead time for flash‐flood warnings would lead to high
false alarm rates.
Flash Flood Warnings are issued as polygons that attempt to match the spatial extent of the true threat
(as opposed to covering entire counties). Like Severe Thunderstorm warnings, they may cover slivers of
counties, or multi‐county swaths. The warning period depends on the duration of the event itself, but
Flash Flood Warnings may continue for several hours after the precipitation has subsided.
4.3.6.10. Detection & Warning
The Chanhassen NWS Office and North Central River Forecast Center (adjoining the Chanhassen office)
monitor local flood conditions using a combination of manual and remotely sensed information. Key
warning detection and decision sources include but are not limited to:
Radar‐estimated precipitation, which can be used in conjunction with flash flood guidance values
to determine flood potential.
Automated, real‐time stream gaging, which indicates the level and flow of critical streams.
Real‐time, manual, or automated rainfall reports
Radar and local meteorological trends, indicating potential for storms to continue and/or
redevelop in or near affected areas.
Reports from spotters, emergency managers, first responders, the media, and the public
Images or videos shared via social media or other means.
The Chanhassen NWS Office will issue a Flash Flood Warning if the forecasters determine that information
from the above and other detection sources indicate that flash flooding is occurring or is imminent in each
area.
4.3.6.11. Critical values and thresholds
Unlike other weather hazards, Watch and Warning thresholds for flash floods vary with the pre‐existing
meteorological conditions. Conditions with saturated soils and high or overtopped streams require
substantially less precipitation to generate flash‐flooding than conditions with low soil moisture and low
stream levels. Although some anticipated precipitation amounts may suggest to forecasters that flash
flooding is possible, irrespective of soil conditions, the Watch and Warning thresholds are generally
determined on a case‐by‐case basis, by considering the Flash Flood Guidance for the area(s) of concern.
Flash Flood Guidance (FFG) values estimate the average amount of rainfall (in inches) for given a duration
required to produce flash flooding in the indicated county or area. These values are based on a
combination on current soil moisture conditions and land cover considerations, and therefore change in
response to the local hydro‐climatic situation. Throughout much of Hennepin County, and especially in
urban areas, less rainfall is required to produce flash flooding than in many neighboring areas, because of
the county’s high concentration of impervious surfaces.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
129
Current flash‐flood guidance for 1, 3, and 6‐hour rainfall can be found at:
https://www.weather.gov/ncrfc/LMI_ROF_NFP_FlashFloodGuidance
4.3.6.12. Prevention
To improve water management and protect the sewage system from damage, cities can revamp their
underground pipe and drainage systems by separating rainwater from the sewage system. The separation
enables the wastewater treatment plant to function properly, without it being overburdened by large
quantities of storm water.
Other more obvious methods are to keep sewer systems clean of clog up with waste, debris, sediment,
tree roots and leaves.
4.3.6.13. Mitigation
Areas that have been identified as flood prone areas can be turned into parks, or playgrounds, buildings
and bridges can be lifted, floodwalls and levees, drainage systems, permeable pavement, soil
amendments, and reducing impermeable surfaces. Reducing impervious surfaces could include the
addition of green roofs, rain gardens, grass paver parking lots, or infiltration trenches.
Other mitigation strategies include developing a floodplain management plan, form partnerships to
support floodplain management, limit or restrict development in floodplain areas, adopt and enforce
building codes and development standards, improve storm water management planning, adopt policies
to reduce storm water runoff, and improve the flood risk assessment.
4.6.3.14. Response
One of the most important things to be done during the initial response is to make sure that people are
safe. If their homes have been damages and are unlivable, finding a place for them to stay is among one
of the top priorities. Next is the access to places if roads are washed out or still underwater. One
complicated factor with flood disasters, is sometimes you do not know how bad the damage is until the
water recedes, which can take time and slow the response. Another important part of response is to make
sure water supply is available as quick as possible if there has been any contamination. The role of
Hennepin County Emergency Management is to coordinate resources that our municipalities may need
to accomplish all response needs.
4.6.3.15. Recovery
As mentioned in river flooding, recovery from floods can take weeks, to months, to years. Extreme
rainfall/flooding is unlike quick onset disasters (e.g., tornadoes) where you can see the damage
immediately, sometimes with excessive rainfall/flooding you must wait for the flood waters to recede to
find out what damage there is to recover from. A lot of the time, the longer the water level stays too high,
the more consequences are introduced that you must then recover from.
4.6.3.16. References
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
130
24‐hour Minnesota Rainfall Record Broken August 19, 2007. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30, 2016, from
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/24hour_rain_record.html
25th Anniversary of the 1987 Twin Cities Superstorm: July 23‐24, 1987. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30, 2016,
from http://climate.umn.edu/doc/journal/870723_24_superstorm.htm
Heavy Rain and Tornadoes: June 19, 2014. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30, 2016, from
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/140619_heavy_rain_tornadoes.html
Heavy Rains Fall on Southeastern Minnesota: August 18‐20, 2007. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30, 2016, from
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/ff070820.html
Heavy Rains of May 31‐June 2, 2014. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30, 2016, from
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/heavyrain140531_140602.html
Historic Mega‐Rain Events in Minnesota. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30, 2016, from
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/summaries_and_publications/mega_rain_events.html
Historic Rainfall and Flooding of August 18‐20, 2007. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30, 2016, from
http://www.weather.gov/arx/aug1907
Minnesota Flash Floods. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30, 2016, from
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/summaries_and_publications/flash_floods.html
National Climate Assessment. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30, 2016, from
http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/report/regions/midwest
PFDS (Precipitation Frequency Data Server/NOAA Atlas 14): Contiguous US. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30,
2016, from http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_map_cont.html?bkmrk=mn
Record‐Setting Rainfall in June 2014. (n.d.). Retrieved March 30, 2016, from
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/140630_wet_june.html
Winkler, J. A., Andresen, J. A., Hatfield, J. L., Bidwell, D., & Brown, D. G. (n.d.). Climate change in the
Midwest: A synthesis report for the national climate assessment.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
131
4.3.7. Hazard Assessment: HEAT, EXTREME
4.3.7.1. Definition
Conditions of extreme heat are defined as
summertime temperatures that are substantially
hotter and/or more humid than average for a location
at that time of year. Humid or muggy conditions,
which add to the discomfort of high temperatures,
occur when an area of high atmospheric pressure
traps hazy, damp air near the ground. Extremely dry
and hot conditions can provoke dust storms and low
visibility. Typically, when extreme heat conditions last for two days or longer, they are called heat waves.
4.3.7.2. Range of Magnitude
The magnitude of extreme heat can vary greatly. You can have extreme heat events where you have
shorter periods (3‐5 days) with much higher‐than‐normal temperatures, or you can have longer periods
(2‐3 weeks) with temperatures only 5‐10 degrees higher than normal temperatures.
Hottest Heat Wave on record MN: July 18, 2011
Longest Heat Wave on record MN: June 3‐10, 2021
Most Recent Heat Wave for Hennepin County: August 25th, 2013
Deadliest MN Heat Wave: August 4‐8, 2001; 5 fatalities
4.3.7.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
Extreme heat can be just as deadly as other natural hazards by pushing the human body beyond its limits.
Under normal conditions, the body’s internal thermostat produces perspiration that evaporates and cools
the body. However, in extreme heat and high humidity, evaporation is slowed, and the body must work
extra hard to maintain a normal temperature. Most heat disorders occur because the victim has been
overexposed to heat or has over exercised for his or her age and physical condition. Effects can be seen
through just a few people or by many depending on extent the temperatures rise above normal, or other
hazards occurring simultaneously. People most at risk include elderly and very young persons, chronically
ill patients, socially isolated people, urban residents, and people without access to air conditioning.
There are different conditions, or disorders, related to extreme heat illnesses: heat stress, heat
exhaustion, heat stroke, and hyperthermia. Heat stress is the perceived discomfort and physiological
strain associated with exposure to hotter than normal environment, especially during physical activity.
Heat exhaustion is a mild‐to‐moderate illness due to water or salt depletion resulting from exposure to
extreme heat conditions or strenuous physical activity. Heat stroke is a severe illness resulting from
exposure to environmental heat, or strenuous physical exercise during extreme heat conditions. Heat
stroke is characterized by a human body core temperature greater than 104oF along with central nervous
system abnormalities such are delirium, convulsions, or coma. Heatstroke can have a fast onset and poor
survival rate.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
132
4.3.7.4. Potential for Cascading Effects
One complicating factor when discussing impacts of extreme heat, is extreme heat doesn’t necessarily
immediately impact people when it sets in, instead it is when the periods of extreme heat last for days
and weeks that it takes its toll on people. Additionally, when overnight air temperatures do not cool below
70 degrees F, it does not give people’s bodies a break from the heat. An additional complicating factor is
when extreme heat conditions are paired with another hazard. For example, if severe thunderstorms
affect an area and knock out power right before extreme heat sets in, you now have additional people
exposed to extreme heat without working air conditioners. Extended durations of extreme heat can also
exacerbate drought conditions and can also lead to excessive power consumption needs causing the
potential for brown‐ and black‐outs, which would only make the exposure conditions worse.
Extended periods of extreme heat also contribute to wildfire hazard through a process wherein natural
materials, particularly sand and bare soil absorb solar radiation, holding the heat very near the surface,
resulting in extremely high surface temperatures. The hot surface heats the overlying air, which rises,
carrying the heat upward. The extremely hot surfaces generate strong updrafts, essentially creating local
winds that dry surrounding vegetation, increase fuel temperatures, and intensify and spread wildfires.
The dry vegetation, high fuel temperatures, and high winds increase the static electricity, increasing the
potential for spontaneous combustion, particularly during prolonged periods of drought. Extreme heat
temperatures can also force the closure of airports due to the lack of sufficient air density for take‐offs
and landings.
4.3.7.5. Geographic Scope of Hazard B1c
When this hazard happens, it can be as small as a local hazard, or countywide with areas of highest
concern in the largest metropolitan areas because of the Urban Heat Island (UHI). Urban heat islands are
large metropolitan urban areas that are warmer in temperature than surrounding rural areas because of
pavement, blacktop, and buildings. The University of Minnesota conducted a study showing the Twin
Cities metro area temperature differences in 2011.
Graphic 4.3.7A illustrates measured temperature differences of up to 10 degrees just within Hennepin
County.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
133
Graphic 4.3.7A
4.3.7.6. Chronologic Patterns
While the definition of extreme heat indicates an extended period where temperatures are above average
high temperature, you typically see extreme heat as an issue during the summer months of May through
September in Hennepin County.
4.3.7.7. Historical Occurrence B1d
There have been several past instances of extreme heat in Hennepin County. The earliest records of
extreme heat include the Dust Bowl of the 1930’s. The Dust Bowl years of 1930‐36 brought some of the
hottest summers on record to the United States, especially across the Plains, Upper Midwest, and Great
Lake States. For the Upper Mississippi River Valley, the first few weeks of July 1936 provided the hottest
temperatures of that period, including many record highs.
Two consecutive heat waves occurred in 1999. The first was on July 23‐25, 1999, when a massive upper
ridge over the central U.S. enabled heat to build into Minnesota. Heat indices ranged from 95‐110 on the
23rd, 90‐105 on the 24th, and climaxed at 95‐116 on the 25th. One death resulted from the heat wave after
a man fell asleep inside a closed vehicle on the 25th. The second heat wave of 1999 occur less than a week
later for central and south‐central Minnesota. This heat wave lasted from July 29th, 1999, through July
30th, 1999. This heat wave was stronger with heat indices climbing to the 95‐114 range with lows in the
70s and dew points in the middle 60s to 70s which produced heat indices 70‐85 even in the morning hours.
In 2001, there were another two heat waves, one that was from July 30 through August 1st, and a second
from August 4th through August 8th. The July 30th‐August 1st heat wave is commonly known for the heat
wave where Minnesota Vikings football player Corey Stringer collapsed on the football field around
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
134
midday on July 31 in Mankato and was taken to the hospital. Mr. Stringer died early on August 1st, 2001.
The second heat wave of 2001 came just three days later and persisted for five days. This heat wave
produced five fatalities all within Hennepin County. Hot weather and tropical‐like humidity pervaded the
region, as virtually all stations registered highs in the 90s all five days. Minneapolis‐St. Paul (MSP) reached
98 or 99 three straight days (August 5‐7) when highs were 98, 99 and 98 respectively; the highs at MSP on
August 6 and August 7 set records. A few noteworthy heat indexes, including the highest known value
around Minnesota for each day, are:
August 4 ‐ 110 at Morris (Stevens County), 107 at Redwood Falls (Redwood County), and 102 at
MSP.
August 5 ‐ 114 at Alexandria (Douglas County) and Morris (Stevens County), 110 at Maple Lake
(Wright County) and Montevideo (Chippewa County), and 107 at Mankato (Blue Earth County)
and at MSP.
August 6 ‐ 118 at Rush City (Chisago County), 114 at Redwood Falls (Redwood County), 110 at
Faribault (Rice County), and 109 at MSP.
August 7 ‐ 117 at Morris (Stevens County), 116 at Redwood Falls (Redwood County), 109 at MSP,
and 107 at Staples (Todd County).
August 8 ‐ 102 at Little Falls (Morrison County) and Staples (Todd County), 100 at Appleton (Swift
County), and 95 at MSP.
Another heat wave occurred in 2005. High temperatures at Minneapolis‐St. Paul International Airport
remained at or above 90 degrees for 9 consecutive days between July 9th and 17th. This extended period
of hot weather set a record for the 3rd longest streak of at or above 90‐degree highs since 1891 in the
Twin Cities. On July 12th, a laborer putting up a fence in Arden Hills in Ramsey County suffered severe
heatstroke. He collapsed at the work site and was rushed to a local hospital. His body temperature
reached 108.8 degrees, but miraculously he survived after receiving intensive medical attention. He
awoke from a medically induced sedation 24 hours after falling ill and made a full recovery.
Two heat waves occurred in 2011, one in June and one in July. The June heat wave occurred on June 7th,
where it broke the all‐time true temperature record for the day at 103oF. This was the warmest day in the
Twin Cities in almost 23 years, when July 31, 1988, had a high of 105 degrees. The second heat wave of
2011 occur in July as a large ridge of high pressure expanded across the Upper Midwest and allowed for
a stagnant pattern, and eventually oppressive heat and humidity to develop. The heat wave broke records
for temperature and dew point, and even heat indices across the region. Maximum heat index values of
115 to 125 were common. A record high minimum temperature was set on July 18th, when a low
temperature of 80 degrees was recorded at Minneapolis ‐ St. Paul International Airport. The previous
record was 78 degrees which was set in 1986. A record high minimum temperature was also set on July
20th, when a low temperature of 80 degrees was recorded. The previous record was 76 degrees which
was set in 1901, 1935 and 1940. A total of 44 fans were treated at Target Field (32 treated in their first aid
facilities and more than a dozen treated in their seats). The heatwave led to record power demand. Xcel
Energy set a record with the highest one‐day peak demand ever of a little more than 9,500 megawatts on
Monday, July 18th. The heat affected turkeys in southwest Minnesota, where 50,000 turkeys died due to
heat related causes near Redwood Falls. In addition to the turkeys that died, several news articles had
references to heat related deaths to livestock in southern and western Minnesota, but the articles were
not specific for counties. The heat and humidity were also blamed for road buckling on I‐94 in Minneapolis.
Two lanes of northbound I‐94 at Lowry Ave, and two lanes of eastbound I‐94 at 49th Ave, were closed
because of buckling pavement.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
135
The most recent heat wave occurred in 2013 specifically August 25th through August 27th. A large ridge of
high pressure built across the central part of the United States during the last week of August. Heat and
humidity increased across the Upper Midwest starting the weekend of August 25th and lasted until the
latter part of the week with a string of 90+ afternoon temperatures, combined with dew points in the 70s,
caused heat indices to rise above 100 degrees from Sunday, through Tuesday, August 27th. In the Twin
Cities metro area, heat indices remained above 80 degrees overnight, and afternoon heat indices
continued above 100 degrees through Thursday afternoon, August 29th. The Minnesota State Fair was
going on during the time. 216 people required treatment at medical stations at the fair for heat related
illnesses, 10 of whom were transported to local area hospitals. In addition, several record high
temperatures were observed, and a dew point temperature of 77 degrees on August 27th at 3:00 PM tied
the MSP high dew point temperature record set on August 27, 1990. It also tied the record for highest
dew point ever during the State Fair (77 degrees ‐ August 28, 1955, and August 27, 1990). Minneapolis
schools canceled all outdoor after‐school athletics practices during this period. The August 26th high of
96 degrees in the Twin Cities broke the 94‐degree record set in 1948. In Hennepin County, from the 25th
through the 29th, there were 28 people who were treated for heat related illnesses, either as walk‐ins at
emergency rooms, or transported by ambulance to hospitals.
There have been no other incidents that are within the scope of this plan.
4.3.7.8. Future Trends B1e
Numerous studies have documented that human‐induced climate change has increased the frequency
and severity of heat waves across the globe. While natural variability continues to play a key role in
extreme weather, climate change has shifted the odds and changed the natural limits, making heat waves
more frequent and more intense. In an unchanging climate both new record highs and new record lows
are set regularly, even while the total number of new records set each year may decrease as time goes
on. Sixty years ago in the continental United States, the number of new record high temperatures
recorded around the country each year was roughly equal to the number of new record lows. Over the
past decade, however, the number of new record highs recorded each year has been twice the number
of new record lows, a signature of a changing climate, and a clear example of its impact on extreme
weather.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
136
4.3.7.9. Indications and Forecasting
Heatwaves are most common in summer when high pressure develops across an area. High pressure
systems can be slow moving and persist over an area for a prolonged period such as days or weeks. Not
all high‐pressure systems bring heat waves. However, high pressure that is combined with high
temperatures and high dew points are those that bring the extreme heat events. Typically, with high
pressure, you have clear skies, which allows strong solar inputs as well. There has been a study done in
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
137
which showed local evaporation also plays a role in causing high moisture values near the surface.
4.3.7.10. Detection & Warning
The two crucial values for the National Weather Service issuing excessive heat products are described
below in the definitions of advisory, watch, and warning criteria.
Excessive Heat Advisory: The heat index will reach 95 °F for at least three hours one day. The
forecast maximum Wet Bulb Globe Temperature will reach 85 for three hours one day. The heat
index will reach 95 °F for two days in a row, along with an overnight low no cooler than 73 °F.
Excessive Heat Watch: A possibility the heat index will reach 100 °F for one day and/ro the forecast
maximum Wet Bulb Globe Temperature could reach 87 for one day, and/or the heat index could
reach 100 °F for two days in a row, along with an overnight low no cooler than 73 °F.
Excessive Heat Warning: Maximum heat index at MSP Airport reaches 100 °F or greater for at
least 1 day. The forecast maximum Wet Bulb Globe Temperature will reach 87 for one day. The
heat index will reach 100 °F for two days in a row, along with an overnight low no cooler than 73
°F. Advisory conditions for at least four consecutive days.
4.3.7.11. Critical Values and Thresholds
The heat index is what gives us the critical values for indications and warnings. The Heat Index is
sometimes referred to as the “apparent temperature”. The Heat Index, given in degrees Fahrenheit, is a
measure of how hot it feels when relative humidity is added to the actual air temperature.
Another measurement that is used to describe how the human body reacts to extreme heat is the Wet
Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT). This is different from the heat index because it factors in wind and solar
radiation along with temperature and humidity. The WBGT parameter has been used by the military for
heat safety since the 1950s as it is a better representation for individuals who are active in the heat, since
wind and sun factor into how out body cools itself off. Many athletic associations including the sports of
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
138
running, football, tennis, and soccer have used the WBGT as well. The critical values used by the military
can be seen below.
4.3.7.12. Mitigation
There are many ways to mitigate for extreme heat events. Mitigating from the health effects of extreme
heat can be having air conditioning, cities opening cooling centers, or adjusting work ours for those
individuals who work primarily outside. There are some energy efficiency measures in houses and small
commercial buildings can help to keep the indoor environment within comfortable temperature
conditions without use of air conditioning during extreme heat events such as: roof deck insulation, wall
insulation, high performance windows, and building orientation.
Mitigation strategies that require coordination and construction include shading of buildings, asphalt and
other dark surfaces with trees can reduce the UHI effect. Solar panels placed on canopies over parking
lots and other paved surfaces can also shade and reduce the UHI effect. Direct shading of buildings also
reduces heat in buildings in the event of power outages in an extreme heat event. However, tree planting
requires adequate space, water, and maintenance, and the correct selection of trees. Another mitigation
strategy is the management and restoration of parks in urban areas increases vegetated areas, which can
help reduce heat island effects. Increasing recreational and riparian spaces in urbanized areas has many
additional benefits including health benefits from air and water quality improvements. Additionally, there
are pavements that have technologies to reduce heat island effects. The pavements reflect more solar
energy, enhance water evaporation, are more porous, or have been otherwise modified to remain cooler
than conventional pavements.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
139
Education about extreme heat can also be a strategy.
TABLE 4.3.7A White‐Newsome et al (2014) describe educational strategies in their four‐city study:
TABLE 4.3.7A Four City Study
4.3.7.13. Response
There are many things an individual can do to respond to extreme heat events. The following list is from
the American Red Cross:
Listen to a NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) Weather Radio for critical
updates from the National Weather Service (NWS).
Never leave children or pets alone in enclosed vehicles.
Stay hydrated by drinking plenty of fluids even if you do not feel thirsty. Avoid drinks with caffeine
or alcohol.
Eat small meals and eat more often.
Avoid extreme temperature changes.
City Recommendations
Detroit
Revisit framing of heat warnings
Invest in full scale public relations campaign to educate residents on heat and
health.
Educate grade school students about climate change.
Ensure that county summer campaign includes a heat health component.
Develop messages that connect climate change to everyday life
New York
Identify strategies to prevent oversaturation of messaging (e.g., home‐based
care providers have many health messages to deliver)
Using focus groups, determine how and where to best promote cooling centers
to a greater diversity of vulnerable persons.
Make health messages that apply to everyone.
Consider additional risk factors in messaging, such as obesity and risk aversion
Philadelphia
Revisit messaging about where to go (e.g., ride public transportation, cooling
centers, mall) during heat waves.
Educate people to participate in traditional cooling behaviors.
Increase messaging to encourage buddy systems or checking on loved ones.
Consider use of social media or partnerships with GenPhilly
(http://www.genphilly.org) to remind younger generations to check on
vulnerable family members
Phoenix
Create clearinghouse of projects and materials
Develop ―check on your neighbor‖ programs or messaging.
Work with Salvation Army on trainings for social service providers
Improve collective definitions of heat wave.
Partner with academics to better translate study findings
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
140
Wear loose‐fitting, lightweight, light‐colored clothing. Avoid dark colors because they absorb heat
from the sun.
Slow down, stay indoors, and avoid strenuous exercise during the hottest part of the day.
Postpone outdoor games and activities.
Use a buddy system when working in excessive heat.
Take frequent breaks if you must work outdoors.
Check on family, friends and neighbors who do not have air conditioning, who spend much of
their time alone or who are more likely to be affected by the heat.
Check on your animals frequently to ensure that they are not suffering from the heat.
As an Emergency Management agency, opening cooling centers to the public, adjust cooling center and
homeless shelter hours to account for those at need during non‐traditional open hours are all response
strategies used. Many time neighborhood networks are also unofficially activated to check on their elderly
and vulnerable populations.
The City of Chicago stated that one of the biggest changes after the 1995 Chicago Heat Wave has been
technology. Chicago now has implemented a 311‐center phone number to reach City Hall. Someone in
another state with an elderly mother living alone in Chicago can call the 311‐center, and a well‐being
check will be conducted by the appropriate agency. This allows the city to be more proactive that reactive
when it comes to calls about extreme heat illnesses.
4.3.7.14. Recovery
Like many other weather‐related disasters, recovery from an extreme heat event is not fast. As
mentioned, consequences from extreme heat can begin to show after the extreme heat has subsided so
checking on vulnerable populations as part of the response, also carries over to the recovery process. It’s
important to acclimatize to changes in temperatures. So as the body has started to get used to extreme
heat once the temperature drops back down can have effects as well. Giving the human body time to
adjust to these shifts is important to remember for workers who may spend most of their day outside.
4.3.7.15. References
Bernard, Susan M., and Michael A. McGeehin. 2004. "Municipal Heat Wave Response Plans". Am J Public
Health 94 (9): 1520‐1522. doi:10.2105/ajph.94.9.1520.
Bouchama, Abderrezak, and James Knochel. 2003. "Heat Stroke". The New England Journal of Medicine
346 (25): 1978‐1988.
Climate Communication Science & Outreach. 2015. "Climate Communication | Heat Waves: The
Details". https://www.climatecommunication.org/new/features/heat‐waves‐and‐climate‐
change/heat‐waves‐the‐details/.
Ksi.uconn.edu. 2015. "Wet Bulb Globe Temperature Monitoring | Korey Stringer Institute".
http://ksi.uconn.edu/prevention/wet‐bulb‐globe‐temperature‐monitoring/.
Kunkel, Kenneth E., Stanley A. Changnon, Beth C. Reinke, and Raymond W. Arritt. 1996. "The July 1995
Heat Wave in the Midwest: A Climatic Perspective and Critical Weather Factors". Bull. Amer.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
141
Meteor. Soc. 77 (7): 1507‐1518. doi:10.1175/1520‐0477(1996)077<1507: tjhwit>2.0.co;2.
Minnesota, University. 2011. "Islands in the Sun | Institute on the Environment | University of
Minnesota". Islands.Environment.Umn.Edu. http://islands.environment.umn.edu/.
Ncdc.noaa.gov. 2015. "Storm Events Database ‐ Event Details | National Climatic Data Center".
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/eventdetails.jsp?id=473157.
Weather.gov. 2015. "Twin Cities, MN". http://www.weather.gov/mpx/.
White‐Newsome, Jalonne, Marie S. O'Neill, Carina Gronlund, Tenaya M. Sunbury, Shannon J. Brines,
Edith Parker, Daniel G. Brown, Richard B. Rood, and Zorimar Rivera. 2009. "Climate Change, Heat
Waves, and Environmental Justice: Advancing Knowledge and Action". Environmental Justice 2 (4):
197‐205. doi:10.1089/env.2009.0032.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
142
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
143
4.3.8. Hazard Assessment: DROUGHT
4.3.8.1. Definition
A generalized definition of drought is a period of
abnormally dry weather sufficiently prolonged for the
lack of water to cause serious hydrologic imbalance in
the affected area. In easier to understand terms, a
drought is a period of unusually persistent dry weather
that persists long enough to cause serious problems
such as crop damage and/or water supply shortages.
If the drought is brief, it is known as a dry spell, or
partial drought. A partial drought is usually defined as
more that 14 days without appreciable precipitation,
whereas a drought may last for years. Another type of drought is a flash drought, which is a “rapid onset
or intensification of drought […] set in motion by lower‐than‐normal rates of precipitation, accompanied
by abnormally high temperatures, winds, and radiation” (NIDIS, 2024). When a drought begins and ends
is difficult to determine because rainfall data alone won't tell you if you are in a drought, how severe your
drought may be, or how long you have been in drought.
The most used drought definitions are based on meteorological, agricultural, hydrological, and
socioeconomic effects:
1. Meteorological – A measure of departure of precipitation from normal. Due to climatic
differences, what might be considered a drought in one location of the country may not be a
drought in another location.
2. Agriculture – Refers to a situation where the amount of moisture in the soil no longer meets the
needs of a particular crop.
3. Hydrological – Occurs when surface and subsurface water supplies are below normal.
4. Socioeconomic – Refers to the situation that occurs when physical water shortages begin to affect
people.
4.3.8.2. Range of Magnitude
The severity of the drought depends upon the degree of moisture deficiency, the duration, and the size
of the affected area. The magnitude of a considered drought event corresponds to the cumulative water
deficit over the drought period, and the average of the cumulative water deficit over the drought period’s
mean intensity.
Most Severe Drought: 1030‐1936 Dust Bowl or ‘Dirty Thirties’
Longest Drought: 1944‐1950s: Southwestern United States
Costliest: Second to the Dust bowl that is estimated to have cost $1 billion in 1930’s money is the
drought of 1989 and 1999. It is estimated the drought costs somewhere between $80 and $120
billion worth in damage.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
144
4.3.8.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
Drought impacts are wide‐reaching and may come in different forms, such as economic, environmental,
and/or societal. A reduction of electric power generation and water quality deterioration are also
potential effects. Drought conditions can also cause soil to compact, decreasing its ability to absorb water,
making an area more susceptible to flash flooding and erosion. A drought may also increase the speed at
which dead and fallen trees dry out and become more potent fuel sources for wildfires. An ongoing
drought which severely inhibits natural plant growth cycles may impact critical wildlife habitats. Drought
impacts increase with the length of a drought, as carry‐over supplies in reservoirs are depleted and water
levels in groundwater basins decline. Impacts from drought can also be exacerbated because of dust
settling on snow, which causes increased solar energy absorption. As a result, snowmelt takes place earlier
in the season and runoff magnitudes increase.
The impacts related to early runoff pose problems for many important sectors in Minnesota including
agriculture, recreation, tourism, and municipal water supplies. Reservoirs may also be at capacity during
these constrained runoff periods, causing spills to be necessary. Ideally, to avoid releases of water
downstream, water is captured over a longer timeframe with gradual melting of snowpack. Alternatively,
dust produced from the hardening and drying of bare soil can also be exposed as vegetative cover
decreases due to extended periods of drought.
Although droughts can be characterized as emergencies, they differ from other emergency events in that
most natural disasters, such as floods or forest fires, occur relatively rapidly and afford little time for
preparing for disaster response. Droughts typically occur slowly, over a multi‐year period, and it is not
obvious or easy to quantify when a drought begins.
4.3.8.4. Potential for Cascading Effects
As mentioned, there are many different consequences that can occur from drought. Since droughts
typically occur over longer time periods of months, seasons, and years it’s possible to start with a few
consequences initially, but as the drought persists or worsens, your consequences can start to multiply.
This can happen within just the drought hazard itself, but another aspect is adding another hazard on top
of or as result of the drought. For example, in drought conditions that have persisted for many months, if
you have a rain event occur over a short period of time, the ground will not be able to absorb the moisture
quick enough creating a flash flood event. Another common cascading event is the threat and increase of
wildfires due to the dry conditions.
4.3.8.5. Geographic Scope of Hazard B1c
Due to natural variations in climate and precipitation, it is rare for all of Minnesota to be deficient in
moisture at the same level at the same time. However, single season droughts, and different magnitudes
and intensity over some portions of the State are quite common. In addition, it is typical for all of Hennepin
County to be within a drought at the same time, although possible to have part of Hennepin County in a
higher level of drought category than another part of the county.
4.3.8.6. Chronologic Patterns
Drought can occur any time of year, however people mostly think of its effects in the spring and summer
months. The onset of summer drought intensity can, and typically, begins with the prior fall and winter
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
145
being drier than average.
4.3.8.7. Historical Data B1d
Perhaps the most devastating weather driven event in American History, the drought of the 1920’s and
1930’s significantly impacted Minnesota’s economic, social, and natural landscapes. Abnormally dry and
hot growing season weather throughout the better part of two decades turned Minnesota farm fields to
dust and small lakes into muddy ponds. The parched soil was easily taken up by strong winds, often
turning day into night. The drought peaked with the heat of the summer of 1936, setting many high
temperature records that still stand today.
One of the most significant droughts to affect the County was the drought of 1976‐1977. The 1976‐77
drought was widespread and by some measures was exceeded only by the severity of conditions during
the 1930’s. In spring of 1976, the general lack of precipitation was statewide. Shallow residential and
farm wells began to go dry in June. Some municipalities also were affected. Precipitation continued to
be much less than normal for the rest of 1976 and gradually returned to normal during the summer of
1977. Minnesota’s State Climatology Office records show the precipitation total for the Twin Cities to be
16.50 inches, well below the 27‐inch average (based on the Twin Cities Monthly & Yearly Twin Cities Total
Average).
Another severe drought that had an impact on Hennepin County was the drought of 1988. A nationwide
event, the Drought of 1988 intensified in June with Minneapolis receiving only 0.22 inches of rain, making
it the driest June ever recorded in the metro area. The June average temperature for Minneapolis was
74.4 degrees Fahrenheit, which equaled the second warmest June ever. Statewide temperatures ranged
from 6 to 9 degrees above normal. By the end of June most of the state was classified as either in “severe”
or “extreme” drought.
The drought continued into July with temperatures six degrees above normal in Minneapolis and rainfall
1.5 to 3 inches below normal. Soil moisture levels reached record lows at most University of Minnesota
Experiment Stations. In the Minneapolis area, maximum temperatures of 90 degrees or greater were
recorded 17 days, a record high for July. Most locations reported maximum temperatures exceeding 100
degrees at least once during the month.
By August, the drought began to subside but not after severe agricultural damage was caused and several
records were broken across Hennepin County and the State of Minnesota including:
June precipitation averaged 1.40 inches statewide, replacing the old record low of 1.50 inches set
in 1910.
May through August average temperature at 69.7 degrees was nearly 2 degrees higher than the
old record set in 1936.
Minneapolis‐St. Paul Airport had 44 days with 90 degrees or more. The old record has been 36
days in 1936.
The Palmer Drought Index dropped below ‐7 in northwest Minnesota for the first time since
record keeping began at the turn‐‐ of‐the‐century. The old record had been ‐6 in September 1934.
Groundwater levels throughout the state reached new record low levels.
The Mississippi River at St. Paul reached low levels previously experienced only in 1934 and 1976,
prompting the first total sprinkling ban in Minneapolis and St. Paul.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
146
There have been no other incidents that are within the scope of this plan.
4.3.8.8. Future Trends B1e
In the past few years, there have been several studies published that show to have conflicting conclusions
when it comes to trends in past drought occurrence and how the future looks. Part of this is because of
the different definitions of drought. Because of the different definitions, a small reduction in the mean of
one parameter, can translate into a much larger increase in drought on the other parameters, or
definitions.
Many of the computer modeling have shown increased trends in drought occurrences across much of the
northern hemisphere. However, results of satellite‐based studies along with other observation‐based
studies conclude there is no significant trend in areas with drought in the past three decades.
4.3.8.9. Indications and Forecasting
Drought intensity categories are based on five key indicators and numerous supplementary indicators.
The accompanying drought severity classification table shows the ranges for each indicator for each
dryness level. Because the ranges of the various indicators often don't coincide, the final drought category
tends to be based on what most of the indicators show. The analysts producing the final determined
category also weighs the indices according to how well they perform in various parts of the country and
at different times of the year.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
147
Range
Category Description Possible Impacts Palmer
Drought
Index
CPC Soil
Moisture
Model
(Percentiles)
USGS Weekly
Streamflow
(Percentiles)
Standardized
Precipitation
Index (SPI)
Objective Short
and Long‐term
Drought
Indicator
Blends
(Percentiles)
D0
Abnormally
Dry
Going into drought:
short‐term dryness
slowing planting,
growth of crops or
pastures. Coming out
of drought: some
lingering water
deficits; pastures or
crops not fully
recovered
‐1.0 to ‐1.9 21‐30 21‐30 ‐0.5 to ‐0.7 21‐30
D1
Moderate
Drought
Some damage to
crops, pastures;
streams, reservoirs,
or wells low, some
water shortages
developing or
imminent; voluntary
water‐use
restrictions
requested
‐2.0 to ‐2.9 11‐20 11‐20 ‐0.8 to ‐1.2 11‐20
D2
Severe
Drought
Crop or pasture
losses likely; water
shortages common;
water restrictions
imposed
‐3.0 to ‐3.9 6‐10 6‐10 ‐1.3 to ‐1.5 6‐10
D3
Extreme
Drought
Major crop/pasture
losses; widespread
water shortages or
restrictions
‐4.0 to ‐4.9 3‐5 3‐5 ‐1.6 to ‐1.9 3‐5
D4
Exceptional
Drought
Exceptional and
widespread
crop/pasture losses;
shortages of water in
reservoirs, streams,
and wells creating
water emergencies
‐5.0 or less 0‐2 0‐2 ‐2.0 or less 0‐2
4.3.8.10. Detection & Warning
At present, the best approach for predicting the development, intensification, and demise of a drought is
a two‐fold strategy that combines the monitoring of both local water and climate conditions and large‐
scale wind patterns, including the comparison of current conditions to historical analogues, with the
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
148
interpretation of computer forecasts. This strategy is employed by both the monthly and seasonal drought
outlooks, which are issued monthly by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National
Weather Service, and Climate Prediction Center as an operational effort geared toward infusing such
advances into drought predictability. Although predicting drought on any scale remains a challenge,
progress in understanding global‐to‐regional scale climate‐system phenomena provides hope for
improving drought prediction at longer lead times.
Early warning of drought onset, and characterization of its evolving environmental and economic impacts,
can be further enhanced using regional‐scale early warning systems that promote sustained partnership
networks linking meteorological and climatological information providers to water, agriculture, and other
private and public management communities.
4.3.8.11. Critical Values and Thresholds
According to the Minnesota Statewide Drought Plan, there are five drought phases/triggers that follow
closely to the drought intensity categories. TABLE 4.3.8A describes the drought triggers from the
Minnesota Drought Plan. These triggers are based on conditions for the different watersheds across the
state.
TABLE 4.3.8A Drought Triggers
Drought Phase/Triggers Conditions
Non‐Drought Phase A signification portion of the watershed is not under drought
conditions according to the U.S. Drought Monitor.
Drought Watch Phase A significant portion of the watershed is “abnormally Dry” or in a
“moderate Drought”.
Drought Warning Phase A significant portion of the watershed is in a “Severe Drought”, or
from public water suppliers using the Mississippi River, the average
daily flow at the USGS gage near Anoka is at or below 2000 cfs for
five consecutive days.
Restrictive Phase A significant portion of the watershed is in an “Extreme Drought”,
or for public water suppliers using the Mississippi River, the
average daily flow at the USGS gage near Anoka is at or below
1500 cfs for five consecutive days.
Emergency Phase A significant portion of the watershed is in an “Exceptional
Drought”, or highest priority water supply needs are not met, or
there are threatened or actual electricity shortages due to cooling
water supply shortages, or for public water suppliers in the Twin
Cities, the average daily flow of the Mississippi Rover UGSG gage
near Anoka is at or below 1000 cfs for five consecutive days.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
149
4.3.8.12. Mitigation
Even though you can’t prevent a drought from occurring, they are hard to predict, or how long they will
last, there are ways you can protect from some of the consequences.
Monitor Drought Conditions: this can provide early warnings for policymakers and planners to
make decisions through actions including:
Monitor Water Supply: This can save water in the long run though the following actions:
Develop a drought emergency plan.
Develop criteria or triggers for drought‐related actions.
Develop agreements for secondary water sources that may be used during drought conditions.
Rotating crops by growing a series of different types of crops on the same fields every season to
reduce soil erosion.
Practicing contour farming by farming along elevation contour lines to slow water runoff during
rainstorms and prevent soil erosion, allowing the water time to absorb into the soil.
Using terracing on hilly or mountainous terrain to decrease soil erosion and surface runoff.
Planting “cover crops,” such as oats, wheat, and buckwheat, to prevent soil erosion.
Using zero and reduced tillage to minimize soil disturbance and leave crop residue on the ground
to prevent soil erosion.
Constructing windbreaks to prevent evaporation from reclaiming salt‐affected soil.
Collecting rainwater and using natural runoff to water plants.
Encourage farmers and agriculture interests to obtain crop insurance to cover potential losses
due to drought.
4.3.8.13. Response
When drought occurs, the water supplier and community must take action to reduce the demand for
water. While increasing water supplies would be of benefit, most such remedies require more than five
years to plan and construct new reservoirs, canals, and/or groundwater sources. Reducing water demand
can result in significant positive effects within only a few days.
Voluntary action from water users can result in up to 25% water use reduction for short periods of time.
Mandatory restrictions have resulted in as much as a 40% reduction of water use. This savings effect is
directly related to a) the public’s belief that the emergency is real; b) the public clearly understands the
actions required to reduce water use; and c) the active enforcement of mandatory water use restrictions.
It is very important for water suppliers to understand the public seldom sustains the voluntary water
conservation levels more than a few months. Drought response actions, even mandatory water use
restrictions are designed to be suspended once the drought is deemed over. Drought response programs
and water efficiency programs are two very different actions for two different problems.
Water efficiency programs are designed to effect long‐term (even permanent) water use reductions;
drought response is designed to solve short term water supply deficits. Water efficiency programs can
reduce the impact of subsequent droughts, but water efficiency strategies continue beyond the term of a
drought. Water efficiency planning is usually based on the economics of avoided costs or least cost
planning. Drought response is meant to solve an emergency supply shortfall; thus, does not always need
to be justified by avoided costs.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
150
4.3.8.14. Recovery
Like all disasters, recovery from drought can takes months to years to return to a state of normalcy. On
August 7, 2012, President Barack Obama called for an "all hands‐on deck" approach to the drought at a
White House Rural Council meeting. At the same meeting, the President asked that the USDA take the
lead in coordinating the Federal effort to help with drought response and recovery.
To support this collaboration across multiple federal agencies, the concepts and organizing principles of
the National Disaster Recovery Framework (NDRF) were leveraged to promote a more integrated and
cohesive response to drought. Based on the input received in the Drought Recovery Regional Meetings,
the NDRF team identified “big bucket” issues to organize Federal resources identified across all applicable
departments and agencies. These included technical assistance, grant programs, loan programs, and
information resources.
TABLE 4.3.8B shows resources for short‐term and long‐term recovery. The short‐term section provides
links to agencies providing relief resources and information. The long‐term recovery section is geared
more toward information to aid in mitigation and adaptation, but long‐term recovery resources are also
listed.
TABLE 4.3.8B Agency and Recovery Support
Agency Short Term Recovery Long Term Recovery
U.S. Department of
Agriculture provides
financial and technical
assistance to drought
affected areas and
services
The Natural Resources Conservation
Service
The Rural Development Program
The Farm Service Agency
Crop Production Losses
Disaster Assistance
Programs
Natural Resource Protection/Private
Lands
Environmental Quality
Incentives Program
Emergency Watershed
Protection
Community Water and Wastewater
Crop Insurance
Risk Management Agency
Natural Resource Protection/Private
Lands
Agricultural Water
Enhancement Program
Emergency Watershed
Protection ‐ Floodplain
Easement
Watershed Protection and
Flood Prevention
Wetlands Reserve Program
Conservation Technical
Assistance
Community Water and Wastewater
Us Department of
Interior
The Recovery Act
The Drought Water Bank
DOI's Bureau of Reclamation
administers the WaterSMART and
water and Energy Efficiency
Grants that aims to make more
efficient use of existing water
supplies through water conservation,
efficiency, and water marketing
projects. Funding is also available to
promote water use efficiency
program projects like rebate
programs, irrigation system
upgrades, water conservation
education programs and to address
and improve Best Management
Practices.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
151
Environmental
Protection Agency
EPA works with states to manage
programs that provide financial
assistance for projects that protect
public health and water quality. EPA
also manages the WaterSense
Program, which helps consumers
identify water‐efficient products,
practices and programs.
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric
Administration
Endangered Species Act
NIDIS
Endangered Species Act
NIDIS
Small Business
Administration
Economic Injury Disaster Loans Economic Injury Disaster Loans
4.3.8.15. References
ClimateStations.com. 2015. 'Graphical Climatology of Minneapolis (1820‐Present)'. Climatestations.Com.
https://www.climatestations.com/minneapolis/.
Damberg, Lisa, and Amir AghaKouchak. 2013. 'Global Trends and Patterns of Drought from Space'.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology 117 (3‐4): 441‐448. doi:10.1007/s00704‐013‐1019‐5.
National Drought Mitigation Center. 2015. 'Drought in the Dust Bowl Years'. Drought.Unl.Edu.
http://drought.unl.edu/DroughtBasics/DustBowl/DroughtintheDustBowlYears.aspx.
Robbins, William. 1989. 'Drought‐Stricken Areas Find Relief After Rains'. The New York Times.
Seneviratne, Sonia I. 2012. 'Climate Science: Historical Drought Trends Revisited'. Nature 491 (7424):
338‐339. doi:10.1038/491338a.
The National Drought Mitigation Center. 2015. 'United States Drought Monitor > About USDM >
Classification Scheme'. Droughtmonitor.Unl.Edu.
http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/aboutus/classificationscheme.aspx.
Trenberth, Kevin E., Aiguo Dai, Gerard van der Schrier, Philip D. Jones, Jonathan Barichivich, Keith R.
Briffa, and Justin Sheffield. 2013. 'Global Warming and Changes in Drought'. Nature Climate
Change 4 (1): 17‐22. doi:10.1038/nclimate2067.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
152
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
153
4.3.9. Hazard Assessment: DUST STORM
4.3.9.1. Definition
A dust storm is a strong, violent wind that carries fine
particles such as silt, sand, clay, and other materials,
often for long distances. The fine particles swirl
around in the air during the storm. A dust storm can
spread over hundreds of miles, rise over 10,000 feet,
and can have wind speeds of at least 25 miles per
hour. Dust storms usually arrive with little warning
and advance in the form of a big wall of dust and
debris. A common name for dust storms is Haboob,
which comes from Arabic word habb meaning wind.
4.3.9.2. Range of Magnitude
There are two main kinds of dust storms; one where the dust is carried along the surface, and the other
where dust is lifted high into the atmosphere. Each of these dust storm types can happen individually, or
together at the same time. If these two types of storms happen together at the same time, there is the
potential for greater magnitude of consequences versus each type individually. Below are a few examples
of dust storms from the National Climatic Data Center that have occurred in the United States since 1950.
Most Recent, Minnesota: May 12, 2022: Blowing dust ahead of a serial derecho (a type of fast‐
moving extreme thunderstorm wind) spread from eastern Nebraska to Sioux Falls, SD, and up
through western Minnesota, dropping visibility below ¼ mile, with zero visibility reported in
places. A lighter wave of blowing dust entered the western Twin Cities area, including Hennepin
County.
Longest Distance: May 17, 2001, Dust from a storm in China traveled across the ocean and
deposited dust from Alaska to Florida.
Most Costly: June 10th, 2013, Humboldt, Nevada, $1.5 million Property Damage
Deadliest: October 13, 2009, SW S.J. Valley, 3 fatalities
4.3.9.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
Dust storms can have environmental, health, social, and economic consequences. Health consequences
include poor air quality due to the increase in breathable suspended particles in the air which can be
almost an instant consequence with people choking on dust or a consequence from particles suspended
over time. Environmental consequence can be dust deposition on the landscape which can cause drying
of leaves, and negative growth of plant and damage to crops. Some of the social impacts can be road and
aviation accidents due to the poor visibility. Economic impacts can include damage to structures, and
roads, costs associated with cleaning of infiltrated dust inside the houses and buildings, costs associated
with accidents, material, crop, and production loss. On 75 million acres of land in the United States alone,
wind erosion is still a dominant problem, with four to five million acres moderately to severely damage
each year.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
154
Many believe that dust storms are not a worry for urban areas. However urban communities are not
immune to the harmful effects of dust storms either. One thing that is a concern when a dust storm hits
a town or city is power outages and infrastructure damage. Anyone of these two things could have a
negative result for a business. Also, there could be extensive damage to computers and communications
equipment from the buildup of dust. The dust particles can get into buildings and businesses and work
their way inside computers and telecommunications equipment, ruining the delicate technologies on the
inside. Again, with many businesses today being dependent on technologies such as computers and
communications equipment, this could have a negative impact on commerce.
Additionally, vulnerable populations within urban or other populated areas may experience
disproportional consequences from dust storms. For instance, those without shelter would have little to
protect themselves from the airborne particulates and may suffer more frequent or acute respiratory
distress. Those with limited mobility may find it similarly difficult to seek shelter. In all cases, persons with
respiratory conditions like asthma, the elderly, infants, and anyone with compromised health may bear a
greater cost from dust storms than the general population.
4.3.9.4. Potential for Cascading Effects
The immediate economic impact of dust storms is significant, but it doesn't rival major natural disasters
that destroy entire cities. For instance, the damage due to dust storms in China averages at about $6.5
billion per year. A single major earthquake can do damage five times that figure. However, experts argue
that the real economic impact of dust storms, particularly those that originate in areas of desertification,
is difficult to pin down because of the long‐term consequences they have on the livelihood of people who
live in the area. When dust storms kick up in agricultural dry lands that are degraded, they remove the
topsoil, which causes further desertification. As a result, farmers are forced to watch the topsoil, and their
livelihood, literally blow away. This cycle, if gone unchecked, threatens to displace whole communities in
some regions.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
155
4.3.9.5. Geographic Scope of Hazard B1c
The winds involved with dust storms can be as small as "dust devils" or as large as fast moving regional air
masses. Dust storms occur most frequently over deserts and regions of dry soil, where particles are loosely
bound to the surface. Dust storms don't only happen in the middle of the desert, however. They happen
in any dry area where loose dirt can easily be picked up by wind. Grains of sand, lofted into the air by the
wind, fall back to the ground within a few hours, but smaller particles remain suspended in the air for a
week or more and can be swept thousands of miles downwind. Dusts storms can reach as high as 10,000
feet with an aerial coverage on the leading edge that can stretch for hundreds of miles. However, on
average, they only travel around 25 to 50 miles.
4.3.9.6. Chronologic Patterns
Dust storms are not common around Minnesota, but they can happen any time of year, and have occurred
in the past. They are most common in desert regions, including the US Southwest and often are triggered
by downdraft winds from monsoon thunderstorms. They are slightly more common during the afternoons
and evenings than at cooler times of day, but only because of the importance of thunderstorms, which
tend to be most numerous and most intense during afternoons or evenings. Otherwise, diurnal cycles of
heating and cooling have no effect on dust storm behavior or probability.
In Minnesota, dust storms are most likely during persistently dry conditions, and/or when dry and loose
soil is also unprotected by mature vegetation. Because the growing season features higher rates of
moisture conduction between plants and soils, and because the same plants will shield underlying soils
from wind erosion, dust storms will tend to favor the pre‐green‐up periods of Late March into May, or
late September into early November.
GRAPH 4.3.9A shows the critical wind erosion period in Minnesota. It shows that March, April, and May
are the periods of the year where agricultural fields are particularly vulnerable to wind erosion, and to
extension dust storms, due to higher wind speeds with direction of prevailing wind than normal and low
vegetative cover on fields.
GRAPH 4.3.9A Critical wind erosion
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Jan Feb March Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Percent of Annual Erosive Winds
Minneapolis, MN
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
156
4.3.9.7. Historical Data B1d
The “Dust Bowl” era of the 1930s was so named because of massive dust storms that frequently ravaged
the Plains during that extraordinarily dry period. During this period, Minnesota saw some of the worst
dust storms in its history. In 1934, dry conditions combined with high winds to produce thick dust on five
or more dates at the end of the month. February had at least six more dust storm dates, followed by 15
dates in March, and 19 dates in April, with the worst of the dust storms occurring on May 9‐10.
Meteorologists at the time reported these latter dust storms were likely the most severe of their kind ever
experienced in the area, with extreme soil erosion exposing and subjecting new seed to the strong winds.
The most recent severe dust storm clipped western Minnesota and hit much of South Dakota head‐on
during a severe weather outbreak on May 12, 2022. Intense downburst winds generated by severe
thunderstorms advanced well ahead of the storms at speeds of 60‐80 mph. The region had been quite
dry, and soils were loose and unprotected by vegetation. As a result, a huge cloud of thick dust raced
north northeastward across the region, dropping visibilities to zero in spots, especially in Nebraska and
South Dakota. Visibility below a quarter mile was common in western Minnesota. A lighter cloud of
blowing dust moved into Hennepin County during the evening, though visibility was hardly reduced, and
no impacts were reported.
There have been no other incidents that are within the scope of this plan.
4.3.9.8. Future Trends B1e
There is no current research available on the direct effects of future climate conditions on the incidence
of dust storms. However, because drought conditions have the effect of reducing wetlands and drying
soils, droughts can increase the amount of soil particulate matter available to be entrained in high winds,
where agriculture practices include tilling. This correlation between drought conditions and dust storms
means that an increase in future droughts could increase the incidence of dust storms, even though the
drought is not directly related to the directly to the dust storm.
4.3.9.9. Indications and Forecasting
Dust storms move quickly. Other than seeing a wall of brown dust approaching in the distance, there is
not much warning before a dust storm arrives. However, they usually precede thunderstorms. So if
conditions have been dry, and one can see a large cumulonimbus cloud and feel the wind is picking up,
one can expect dust to be blowing with the possibility of dust storm type reduced visibilities and
consequences. Dust storm events are caused by different weather systems showing different intensities
and identifiable characterizes in observational systems.
There are four dust storm generation types: frontal, meso‐ or small‐scale, disturbances, and cyclogenesis.
Key features of cold front‐induced dust storms are their rapid process with strong dust emissions and a
large, affected area. Frontal dust storms typically last 3‐5 hours with wind speeds of 36‐83 mph and
typically affect an area of 7,700 to 77,000 square miles.
Meso‐ or small‐scale dust storms are the most common type of dust storm including thunderstorms,
convections along dry lines, gusty winds cause by high pressure, and more. The most common occurrence
are thunderstorms in which the organized outflow from the downdrafts of decaying thunderstorms blows
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
157
dust plumes. These storms can typically last 2‐5 hours with winds from 53 to 78 mph. They produce the
highest level of particle emission over a limited area, typically 2,000 to 6,000 square miles.
The third type of dust storms are caused by tropical disturbances. These typically show strong
concentration of dust in the air and last longer than frontal and meso‐ or small scale at 3‐7 hours with
wind speeds 30 to 58 mph. The typical area covered is just 200 to 4000 square miles.
The last type of dust storm occurs from cyclogenesis which is the development of strengthening or a lower
pressure area. Dust storms from cyclogenesis typically last longer than the others at 4‐21 hours with wind
speeds 38 to 65 mph because cyclogenesis tends to be stationary. These storms typically affect and area
of 4000 to 31,000 square miles.
4.3.9.10. Detection & Warning
As mentioned earlier, there is not a lot of indication for dust storms besides knowing the current
conditions that may present the storm from occurring. However, with each of the types of dust storms
mentioned above, there is never always a dust storm when those conditions are present. The National
Weather Service in Chanhassen does not have a specific definition for when they would issue a blowing
dust advisory or dust storm warning. In fact, The NWS Office in Chanhassen has never issued a blowing
dust advisory or dust storm warning. However, the Grand Forks National Weather Service has.
4.3.9.11. Critical Values and Thresholds
The blowing dust advisory conditions, visibilities at or below 1 mile, and dust storm warning, visibilities
less than ¼ mile, are the two critical values when it comes to warning the public for public safety concerns.
Among those concerns are health concerns when dust particles are inhaled. The particles that are small
enough to be inhaled are known as PM10 which are particulate matter less than 10 microns in size or
smaller.
4.3.9.12. Mitigation
The effects of sand and dust storms can be reduced by using several health & safety measures and
environmental control strategies. Large‐scale sand and dust storms are generally natural phenomena,
and it may not be always practicable to prevent it happening. However, control measures can be taken to
reduce its impacts.
To reduce the consequences of dust events that may not reach dust storm criteria, cities can take
appropriate control of dust raising factors such as increasing the vegetation cover where possible using
native plants and trees as buffer. These can reduce wind velocity and sand drifts at the same time of
increasing the soil moisture.
Some health and safety measures that should be taken to minimize the adverse impacts due dust storms
can be alerting vulnerable populations, using dust masks, and restricting outdoor activities and staying
inside when dust storms are occurring.
Mitigation strategies to reduce wind erosion from dust storms are lumped into two major categories:
reduce the wind force at the soil surface and create a soil surface more resistant to wind forces. Some of
these strategies are standing residues, planting perpendicular to prevailing winds, windbreaks, grass
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
158
barriers, strip cropping, or clod‐producing tillage.
4.3.9.13. Response
One of the most important things to be done during the initial response is to make sure that people are
safe. The role of Hennepin County Emergency Management is to coordinate resources that our
municipalities may need to accomplish all response needs.
4.3.9.14. Recovery
It is important to note that conditions and consequences from a dust storm may linger longer that one
can see to the naked eye. There may be lingering dust in the air after a dust storm so the first step to
recovery is to continue to avoid breathing in outdoor air for hours after a storm passes. From an
emergency management perspective, assessing the amount of property damage, preparing a list of
specific damage to property and buildings, and agriculture damage are top on the list to start the recovery
process.
4.3.9.15. References
Lei, H., and J. X. L. Wang. 2014. 'Observed Characteristics of Dust Storm Events Over The Western United
States Using Meteorological, Satellite, And Air Quality Measurements'. Atmospheric Chemistry and
Physics 14 (15): 7847‐7857. doi:10.5194/acp‐14‐7847‐2014.
Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience. 2012. State of Oregon Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan.
http://www.oregon.gov/LCD/HAZ/docs/OR_NHMP_2012.pdf.
Stefanski, R, and M V K Sivakumar. 2009. 'Impacts of Sand and Dust Storms on Agriculture and Potential
Agricultural Applications of A SDSWS'. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 7: 012016.
doi:10.1088/1755‐1307/7/1/012016.
Tatarko, John. 2004. Wind Erosion: Problem, Processes, and Control. Ebook. 1st ed.
http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_019407.pdf.
W. A., Mattice. 1935. 'Dust Storms Novemeber 1933 to May 1934'. Monthly Weather Review 63 (2): 53‐
55
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
159
4.3.10. Hazard Assessment: COLD, EXTREME
4.3.10.1. Definition
The term extreme cold can have varying definitions
in hazard identification. Generally, extreme cold
events refer to a prolonged period (days) with
extremely cold temperatures. An extreme cold event
is when temperatures are dangerously lower than
historical averages and pose risk to people, animals,
and critical infrastructure (CISA, 2024). The extreme
cold definition also depends on the area you live. In
southern regions relatively unaccustomed to winter weather, near freezing temperatures could be
considered extreme cold. In the North, extreme cold can mean temperatures well below zero.
When defining extreme cold one also must mention wind chill. The wind chill temperature is an apparent
temperature, or how cold it feels to people outside. Wind chill is based on the rate of heat loss from
exposed skin caused by wind and air temperature. As the wind increases, it draws heat from the body,
driving down skin temperature and eventually the internal body temperature.
4.3.10.2. Range of Magnitude
Lowest Temperature in MN: ‐60°F (Feb 2, 1996: St. Louis County)
Lowest Temperature in Hennepin County: ‐41°F (Jan 21, 1888)
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
160
Lowest Wind Chill in MN: ‐71 oF with new formula and ‐100 oF with old formula (Jan 9‐10, 1982)
Lowest Wind Chill in Hennepin County: ‐6‐73 oF with the new formula and ‐87 oF with the old
formula. (Jan 22, 1936)
Lowest Maximum Temperature for Hennepin County: ‐20 (Jan 15, 1988)
Longest period temperature below 32°F in Hennepin County: 66 Day 16 Hours (8PM Dec 18, 1977,
through 11 AM Feb 23, 1978)
Longest Period temperature below 0°F in Hennepin County: 7 Days 18 hours (8 PM Dec 31, 1911,
through 10 AM Jan 8, 1912)
4.3.10.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
Extreme cold temperatures have well known impacts on human health. On average, the United States
sees 29 cold weather‐related fatalities each year. In 2019, there were 62 cold‐related deaths in Minnesota
(MN DPH, 2019).
Human and animal exposure to cold temperatures, whether indoors or outside, can lead to serious or life‐
threatening health problems such as hypothermia, cold stress, frostbite or freezing of the exposed
extremities such as fingers, toes, nose, and ear lobes. Hypothermia occurs when the core body
temperature is less than < 95oF. If persons exposed to excessive cold are unable to generate enough heat
(e.g., through shivering) to maintain a normal core body temperature of 98.6oF, their organs can
malfunction. When brain function deteriorates, persons with hypothermia are less likely to perceive the
need to seek shelter. Signs and symptoms of hypothermia (e.g., lethargy, weakness, loss of coordination,
confusion, or uncontrollable shivering) can increase in severity as the body's core temperature drops.
Extreme cold also can cause emergencies in susceptible populations, such as those without shelter, those
who are stranded, or those who live in a home that is poorly insulated or without heat (such as mobile
homes). Infants and the elderly are particularly at risk, but anyone can be affected.
Damage to structures due to extreme cold events is relatively low. Freezing pipes can be the largest
problem. Extended periods of cold weather can increase the potential for frost depth problems. The depth
to which soils freeze and thaw is important in the design of pavements, structures, and utilities. Increased
depth of frost can also delay the frost thaw in the spring which would cause those in agriculture a later
start to their season, which may lead to less yield of crops. Broken water mains can put significant
demands on municipal public works departments.
4.3.10.4. Potential for Cascading Effects
Extremely cold temperatures often accompany a winter storm, so individuals may have to cope with
power failures and icy roads. Although staying indoors as much as possible can help reduce the risk of car
crashes and falls on the ice, individuals may also face indoor hazards. Many homes may become too cold
either due to a power outage or because the heating system is not adequate for the weather. The use of
space heaters and fireplaces to keep warm increases the risk of household fires and carbon monoxide
poisoning.
During cold months, carbon monoxide may be high in some areas because the colder weather makes it
difficult for car emission control systems to operate effectively. Carbon monoxide levels are typically
higher during cold weather because the cold temperatures make combustion less complete and cause
inversions that trap pollutants close to the ground reducing air quality.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
161
4.3.10.5. Geographic Scope of Hazard B1c
Extreme cold is typically associated with the northern states in the winter. However, extreme cold
conditions can occur as far south as Texas. As mentioned in the definition, the social impact or where/how
the public is accustomed to cold weather plays a factor in what is called extreme cold for a specific
geographical area.
GRAPHIC 4.3.10A shows an example from 2014. You can see extreme cold apparent temperatures for
most of the central United States.
GRAPHIC 4.3.10A
4.3.10.6. Chronologic Patterns
Extreme cold outbreaks occur most commonly during the December, January, February months of the
year.
4.3.10.7. Historical Occurrence B1d
Extreme cold is a regular occurrence in Minnesota and in Hennepin County. There have been no incidents
that are significant enough to be included in this plan.
GRAPHICS 4.3.10B and 4.3.10C shows historically the frequency of lows at or below ‐10oF and highs at or
below 0 degrees in Hennepin County.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
162
GRAPHIC 4.3.10B
GRAPHIC 4.3.10C
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
163
What is the coldest wind chill ever seen in the Twin Cities or Minnesota? The answer can be a little tricky
because in November 2001 the formula on how to calculate the wind chill was changed. Perhaps the
coldest wind chill the Twin Cities has ever seen was ‐67oF with the new formula (‐87oF with the old
formula) back on January 22, 1936. The temperature was ‐34oF with a wind speed of 20mph. All traffic in
the Twin Cities was severely impacted and several fatalities were caused by the cold. Without a lengthy
state‐wide wind record, it is difficult to say when the coldest statewide wind chill was. There are some
candidate dates though besides January 22, 1936. On January 9th and 10th, 1982 temperatures of ‐30oF
and winds of around 40mph were reported in Northern Minnesota. This would translate to ‐71oF by the
new formula (‐100oF by the old formula.)
A few other notable extreme cold events are:
1989 Feb 3:
At 6:00 AM in the Twin Cities the air temperature was ‐22oF with a wind speed of 17mph,
creating a wind chill temperature of ‐49oF (by the 2001 formula).
1994
On January 13, 1994, an arctic air mass settled over Hennepin County. From January 13
to January 19, true air temperatures dropped from ‐10oF on January 13 to ‐27oF on
January 19. The high temperature on January 18 was ‐16oF. Morning air temperature
readings were ‐26oF in the Twin Cities at 9am with a wind chill temperature of ‐48oF (by
the 2001 formula). The University of Minnesota on the Twin Cities campus closed on the
18th due to the cold and Governor Arne Carlson closed all public schools.
1996
On January 31, 1996, some of the coldest weather to ever hit Hennepin County settled
over the area and remained entrenched through February 4. Minneapolis set three new
record low temperatures as well as Minnesota recording the coldest day on record on
February 2. A mean temperature of ‐25oF was measured that day with a high of ‐17oF and
a low of ‐32oF. This was within two degrees of tying the record low temperature set in the
Twin Cities and the coldest temperature recorded this century. On the same date that
the Minnesota state record minimum temperature record was set on February 2, 1996 (‐
60oF near Tower), Governor Arne Carlson cancelled schools for cold a second time. In the
Twin Cities at 6am February 2, 1996, the air temperature was ‐30oF with a wind chill
temperature of ‐48oF (based on the 2001 formula).
Another extreme cold event took place on December 24, 1996. A strong low‐pressure
system that deposited heavy snow over northern Minnesota also brought down very cold
Canadian air. Temperatures fell to 15 to 35 degrees below zero. In addition, the high
temperature on Christmas Day in Minneapolis was only ‐9oF. Combined with the record
low temperature that morning of ‐22oF, the mean temperature for Christmas Day was ‐
16oF. Christmas Day, 1996 set a record for being the coldest Christmas Day on record for
the Twin Cities metro going back to when modern day records began in 1871. The
temperature in Minneapolis fell to ‐27oF.
2004
The first wind chill warning that was issued for the Twin Cities under the new wind chill
temperature formula established in 2001 was the arctic outbreak of January 29‐30, 2004.
The coldest wind chill observed in the Twin Cities during that period was ‐43oF at 8:00 AM
on January 30, 2004.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
164
2006
In the wake of a winter storm on February 17, 2006, strong high pressure moved in and
created strong winds and dangerous wind chills. The coldest wind chill seen at the Twin
Cities International Airport was ‐34oF. The coldest wind chill found statewide was ‐54oF at
Thief River Falls.
2014
Governor Mark Dayton cancelled K‐12 public schools statewide on Monday January 6th,
2014, due to extreme wind chills that were forecasted well in advance. The coldest wind
chill temperature in Minnesota was ‐63oF at Grand Marais Airport at 9:00 AM with a ‐31oF
air temperature and a 21mph wind. The coldest wind chill temperature in the Twin Cities
was ‐48oF at 5:00 AM with an air temperature of ‐22oF and a 15‐mph wind. Many schools
also cancelled classes the following day as well. The wind chill at 4am January 7th was ‐
28oF at the Twin Cities International Airport with an air temperature of ‐14oF and a wind
of 6mph. Statewide the coldest wind chill was ‐50oF reported at Duluth at 4:00 AM with
an air temperature of ‐23oF and a west wind of 16mph.
Schools were cancelled at many locations again on Thursday, January 23. The coldest wind
chill in the Twin Cities on January 23 was at 2:00 AM with a wind chill of ‐37oF with an air
temperature of ‐14oF and a NW wind of 15mph. The coldest statewide wind chill was ‐
51oF at Park Rapids at 6am with an air temperature of ‐33oF and as wind of 6mph.
Schools were cancelled for a fourth day across the Twin Cities on January 27 as well.
Classes were also canceled for the day for the University of Minnesota. The coldest wind
chill in the Twin Cities was ‐39oF at 4:00 AM (‐13oF air temp and wind NW 20mph). The
coldest wind chill statewide was ‐53oF degrees at the Grand Marais Airport at 8:00 AM (‐
26oF air temp, wind NE 16mph).
Schools were cancelled once more across the Twin Cities on Tuesday January 28th.
University of Minnesota classes were cancelled in the morning. The coldest wind chill in
the Twin Cities was ‐29oF at 9am with an air temperature of ‐12oF and a wind speed of
8mph. The coldest wind chill in the state was ‐52oF at Fosston at 7:00 AM with air
temperature of ‐33oF degrees and a wind speed of 7mph from the south.
4.3.10.8. Future Trends B1e
In Minnesota, there are climate change signals showing the loss of formerly normal cold temperatures.
That is saying that the coldest day of the year has warmed by about 8oF since the early 20th century and
the 15 coldest days have warmed by about 7o F over the same period.
GRAPHIC 4.3.10D shows this warming period of coldest temperatures from about 1970 forward. This
means the coldest high temperatures have warmed dramatically since 1970 and are now warmer than at
any other time on record. In addition, the high temperatures at or below zero have become much less
common in recent years and may soon be the exception, rather than the rule.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
165
GRAPHIC 4.3.10D
While temperatures during our winter months seem to be warming, and as mentioned high temperatures
at or below zero have become much less common in recent years, this does not mean we will not be
seeing any extreme cold events in the future.
4.3.10.9. Indications and Forecasting
The National Weather Service is responsible for forecasting all extreme cold events for Hennepin County.
Typically, extreme cold events occur when a continental polar or continental arctic air mass makes its way
down over Minnesota. These are air masses that originate over the ice and snow‐covered regions of
northern Canada and Alaska where long, clear nights allow for strong cooling of the surface. Extreme cold
typically occurs with or following a low pressure. As the system passes off to the east, continental polar
or continental arctic air gets pulled down on the backside of the low pressure.
4.3.10.10. Detection & Warning
The National Weather Service issues Wind Chill Advisories, Watches, or Warnings based on the following
forecasted criteria:
Wind Chill Advisory: Widespread wind chill values around ‐25oF to ‐34°F are expected.
Wind Chill Watch: Widespread wind chill values around ‐35oF or colder are possible.
Wind Chill Warning: Widespread wind chill values around ‐35°F or colder are expected.
Extreme Cold Watch: The possibility of wind chill or air temperatures colder than ‐35 °F.
Extreme Cold Warning: Wind chills or air temperatures colder than ‐35 °F are expected.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
166
4.3.10.11. Critical Values and Thresholds
Depending on where you live in the state, there are different critical values that related to the advisories,
watches, and warnings listed above. The critical wind chill values for Hennepin County are ‐25oF and ‐35oF.
It is at ‐25oF that exposed skin can start to see frostbite in 30 minutes of being outside. At ‐35oF, it can
take only 10 minutes for exposed skin to be susceptible to frostbite.
4.3.10.12. Mitigation
Education and Awareness Programs
Educating the public regarding the dangers of extreme cold and steps they can take to protect
themselves when extreme cold occurs.
Organize outreach to vulnerable populations, including establishing and promoting accessible
heating centers in the community.
Encourage utility companies to offer special arrangements for paying heating bills.
Educate homeowners and builders on how to protect their pipes including locating water pipes
on the inside of building insulation or keeping them out of attics, crawl spaces, and vulnerable
outside walls.
Informing homeowners that letting a faucet drip during extreme cold weather can prevent the
buildup of excessive pressure in the pipeline and avoid bursting.
4.3.10.13. Recovery
Depending on the consequences that occurred during the extreme cold event, recovery can be short or
long. Recovery time from frostbite depends on the extent of tissue that was affected. It can take
sometimes up to three months to determine the extent of the damage. When it comes to recovery from
deep frost depth, it can take months to years to recover from consequences of broken water mains or
broken roadways, or crop yield.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
167
4.3.10.14. References
Dnr.state.mn.us,. 2016. "Minneapolis/St. Paul Climate Data ‐ Extremes: Minnesota DNR".
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/twin_cities/extremes.html.
Kunkel, Kenneth E., Roger A. Pielke, and Stanley A. Changnon. 1999. "Temporal Fluctuations in Weather
and Climate Extremes That Cause Economic and Human Health Impacts: A Review". Bull. Amer.
Meteor. Soc. 80 (6): 1077‐1098. doi:10.1175/1520‐0477(1999)080<1077:tfiwac>2.0.co;2.
Medina‐Ramon, M, and J Schwartz. 2007. "Temperature, Temperature Extremes, And Mortality: A Study
of Acclimatisation and Effect Modification In 50 US Cities". Occupational And Environmental
Medicine 64 (12): 827‐833. doi:10.1136/oem.2007.033175.
Nws.noaa.gov,. 2016. "NWS Weather Fatality, Injury and Damage Statistics".
http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/hazstats.shtml.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,. 2014.
Deaths Attributed to Heat, Cold, And Other Weather Events in The United States, 2006‐2010.
Young, B.A. 1981. "Cold Stress as It Affects Animal Production". Journal Of Animal Science 52 (1): 154‐
163.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
168
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
169
4.3.11. Hazard Assessment: WINTER STORM, BLIZZARD, EXTREME SNOWFALL
4.3.11.1. Definition
Winter storms produce intense
snowfall rates and/or large
accumulations that can
immobilize entire regions and
paralyze cities, stranding
commuters, closing airports,
stopping the flow of supplies,
and disrupting emergency and
medical services. The weight of
snow can cause roofs to
collapse and knock down trees
and power lines. Homes, farms,
and businesses may be isolated
for days. The cost of snow
removal, repairing damages,
and the loss of business can
have severe economic impacts
on counties and municipalities. In Hennepin County, virtually all winter storms are generated by the
convergence of moisture and cold temperatures associated with low‐pressure systems.
Blizzards represent the most dangerous class of winter storms, combining strong winds with falling or
freshly fallen snow to reduce visibility for a period of time. Technically, they are defined as three hours or
more of sustained winds or frequent gusts of 35 mph or higher in falling or blowing snow, and visibilities
reduced to a quarter mile or less. The strong winds create deadly whiteout conditions that bring traffic to
a standstill, enabling the wind‐driven snow to form dangerous drifts that are impossible for many vehicles
to pass. In addition, the strong winds are often accompanied by falling temperatures and low wind chills,
subjecting stranded motorists to life‐threatening conditions that may persist for 24 hours or more. Lastly,
the strong winds of blizzards exert additional stress upon structures if they were already straining under
the load of heavy snow.
All winter storms have some combination of cold air, moisture, and lifting mechanisms that turn the
moisture into precipitation. Most winter storms affecting Hennepin County are associated with
extratropical cyclones (low‐pressure systems). Typically, the heaviest snow and blizzard conditions are
found on the left side of the path of the storm system.
Cars on Excelsior Boulevard after 1940 “Armistice Day Blizzard.” Courtesy
MN Historical Society
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
170
Typical weather pattern associated with major winter storms in Minnesota and Upper Midwest. Source
NOAA, http://www.nws.noaa.gov/os/winter/resources/Winter_Storms2008.pdf
Unfortunately, blizzards are not consistently tracked and are difficult to diagnose retroactively.
Moreover, most major winter storms in Hennepin County have not prompted Blizzard Warnings. In fact,
one of the last NWS‐issued Blizzard Warning in Hennepin County was on November 1‐2, 1991, during the
infamous Halloween Blizzard. However, many winter storms have produced Blizzard warnings in
neighboring counties, along with winds in Hennepin County that significantly compounded the impacts
from accumulating snow. Therefore, to avoid confusion and the misattribution of impacts, in this report, a
blizzard is any accumulating snow event known to have a significant wind‐driven and blowing snow
component.
While many winter storms produce sleet and/or freezing rain, Hennepin County Emergency Management
recognizes these as distinct hazards and will cover them separately.
4.3.11.2. Range of Magnitude
A given location in Hennepin County sees 24‐hour snowfall totals over six inches once or twice per year
on average, though there have been years with five or more such events. Blizzards, on the other hand,
recur approximately once every 3‐4 years in western and northwestern parts of the county, and every 6‐
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
171
8 years inside the 494‐694 loop. It should also be noted that blizzard conditions can occur without large
snowfall accumulations. These “ground blizzard” situations are most common in rural Minnesota, but can
occur in open areas of Hennepin County, west of the I‐494 corridor, and especially west of MN highway
101.
Duration Largest value at MSP Date
Calendar‐day snowfall 18.5” 11/1/1991
24‐hour snowfall 21.1” 10/31‐11/1/1991
2‐day snowfall 26.7 10/31‐11/1/1991
3‐day snowfall 34.6” 01/20‐22/1982
5‐day snowfall 39.1” 01/20‐24/1982
Monthly total 46.9” November 1991
Duration Largest value in Minnesota Date
24‐hour snowfall 36” (near Finland, Lake County) 01/07/1994
Snowstorm total 47” (near FInland, Lake County 01/06‐08/1995
Monthly total 66” (Collegeville) March 1965
4.3.11.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
Outdoor life safety hazards: Severe winter storms and blizzards are often accompanied by falling
temperatures and dangerous wind chills. Persons caught outside unprepared can face
disorientation, frostbite, hypothermia, and death. A quarter of winter storm casualties occur
among those caught outside in the storm.
Power outages/utilities: Heavy snow can cause power outages from direct loading on electrical
wires, and more commonly from indirect sources, for example when tree limbs become
overloaded with snow and fall onto wires. Heavy, wet snow can cause widespread power outages,
and strong winds exacerbate this impact. The duration of service outages is typically related to
the complexity and magnitude of the outage pattern, along with the ability of crews to get to
repair sites. Thus, high‐volume, heavy, wet, wind‐driven snow events are associated with higher
outage numbers and longer service delays.
Structural failure: Heavy snow will can cause roof collapse, not just at residences, but at larger
commercial facilities as well. Large roof spans lacking consistent support are especially vulnerable.
The former Hubert H Humphrey Metrodome Stadium in Minneapolis failed three separate times
from excessive snow loads causing the Teflon canopy to tear.
Transportation: By far the greatest and most common impacts from winter storms in Hennepin
County are to the transportation infrastructure, but there is no strict threshold above which heavy
snow is guaranteed to produce a particular impact. Stranded vehicles and snow removal costs
increase with greater accumulations, but accidents and spinouts are often a function of prior road
conditions, driver preparedness and awareness, and the consistency of the accumulating snow.
For instance, from January 31‐ February 2, 2004, a well‐forecast series of winter storms produced
widespread 8‐11" snowfall totals across the Twin Cities, but a relatively small impact, owing to
preparedness, and the generally fluffy nature of the snow. By contrast, a much smaller event on
March 8 that same year, produced only 1‐3 inches, but did so unexpectedly and within a 2‐hour
window. This "surprise" event caused hundreds of spinouts and accidents and forced the closure
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
172
of the I‐94 exit at Highway 280.
The NWS estimates that 70% of winter storm related casualties result from vehicular accidents.
Heavy snow impedes traffic, creates hazardous travel conditions, and requires plowing and
surface treatment to keep roads passable. It also significantly reduces visibilities, which
compromises driver reaction times. In blizzard conditions, the effect of wind further restricts
visibilities, often to zero, and can easily disorient drivers. Stranded drivers and those forced to
leave their vehicles because of accidents are often directly exposed to the harsh conditions
outside their vehicles and can quickly find themselves in a life‐threatening situation.
Airports frequently experience significant delays, and it is common for all runways to close for a
time during major winter storms.
4.3.11.4. Potential for cascading effects
Heavy snow and blizzard conditions can occupy a large portion of any strong, cold‐season extratropical
cyclone, and as a result can precede, follow, or be accompanied by a wide range of weather conditions.
Situational awareness is key to understanding if and how the effects of winter storm conditions will be
compounded by the following hazards.
Flooding: Unusually intense and/or repetitive snowfalls can drain local governments of their
resources, as crews put in long hours to maintain roads, and clear debris. As the heavy snow melts,
it poses flooding risks for area streams, basements, low‐lying intersections, and other areas prone
to ponding. Heavy rainfall events falling onto or just after the melting of a large snowpack pose
immediate flooding threats, as soil storage capacity is often very limited. In April of 2001, heavy
rains in southern Minnesota caused considerable flooding, after an unusually long and snowy
season left a large snowpack and saturated soils.
Extended power outages: A severe winter storm that knocks out power becomes much more
dangerous as the time to restore service increases. This is especially true of storms that are
followed by a rapid drop in temperatures. Residences and facilities dependent on electrical power
for heating or heat distribution can become dangerously cold within hours of power loss.
Sometimes a heavy snowfall event or blizzard occurs shortly after a major ice storm. In these
cases, the ice produces the initial critical loading, but then the snow and/or wind acts as the “final
straw,” resulting in severe and widespread power outages. In these situations, the snowstorm or
blizzard is just another link in a chain of cascading hazards already in progress.
Overexertion: Snow removal after a major event often results in a casualty spike related to
overexertion resulting from attempting to dislodge stranded vehicles and clear snow from
sidewalks and driveways. It is a major cause of winter‐related fatalities in the US.
Severe weather: In rare situations, a major winter storm can follow a significant severe weather
event. An infamous tornado‐blizzard combination affected Janesville, WI on November 11, 1911.
The tornado killed nine people and was followed almost immediately by a historic cold front that
brought blizzard conditions within a couple hours of the tornado’s passage, as temperatures fell
from the 60s and 70s into the teens. On April 26, 1984, a strong, killer tornado hit Minneapolis
and St. Anthony, and was followed within three days by up to 10 inches of snow. Most recently,
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
173
on March 31, 2014, a confirmed tornado struck near St. Leo in Lyon County MN, while a Blizzard
Warning was already in effect.
4.3.11.5. Geographic Scope of Hazard B1c
A given winter storm may affect several hundred
thousand square miles over a period of days, and often
will have an instantaneous footprint of 50,000 square
miles, under which dangerous winter weather
conditions are occurring. The swath of all precipitation
including rain and thunderstorms may cover an area
the size of several Midwest states.
Winter storms have occurred in virtually every part of
the US, except for coastal southern California, parts of
the Sonoran Desert, and southern Florida. The most
severe winter storms are found in the Central and
Northern Plains, and downwind of the Great lakes, and
along the East Coast. Comparatively, Minnesota
experiences storms that generally produce lesser
snowfall totals and/or weaker winds.
4.3.11.6. Chronologic patterns (seasons, cycles, rhythm)
Winter storm season in Minnesota extends from late October through April, with peak frequencies from
late‐November through mid‐March. Historically, February has had the fewest major snowstorms.
However, since 2004, February has become remarkably more active, while March has become less so.
4.3.11.7. Historical data/previous occurrence B1d
The Twin Cities has had dozens of major winter storms since the late 19th century, with 25 calendar‐day
snowfalls of 10 inches or greater, and 26 two‐day totals of at least 12 inches (TABLE 4.3.11A).
TABLE 4.3.11A Historical 2‐day snowfall totals of 12” or greater in the Twin Cities. Events in bold are known
blizzards in Hennepin County since 1940.
Date ending Total (in.) Date ending Total (in.)
11/17/1886 13.0 1/21/1982 17.4
3/12/1899 12.0 1/23/1982 20.0
3/1/1907 12.0 12/28/1982 16.5
4/28/1907 13.0 4/14/1983 13.6
12/17/1908 12.8 11/28/1983 12.2
Extent of precipitation associated with major winter
storm on December 11, 2010
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
174
Additionally, some smaller snowstorms have also produced blizzard conditions in Hennepin County.
Notable recent examples include March 1‐2, 2007, and February 21, 2014, when 6‐12 inches of snow were
finished off with 25‐40 mph winds. Following are more detailed accounts of some of the area’s most
noteworthy winter storms.
The Armistice Day storm of November 11, 1940
is the defining blizzard of the 20th century in Minnesota and remains the storm against which all
other blizzards in this state are compared. It was a high‐impact, high‐mortality blizzard affecting
a huge swath of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, and the Dakotas.
The storm began as a low‐
pressure area over Colorado on
the morning of November 10,
which then swung
northeastward and intensified
rapidly as it passed over La
Crosse and eventually Lake
Superior on the 12th.
Initially warm conditions gave
way to rapidly falling
temperatures, and rain turning
to extremely heavy windswept
snow. Winds were sustained
above 30 mph over much of
Minnesota, with gusts exceeding
65 mph in some areas. Snowfall
rates at times were as high as
three inches per hour. Snowfall
totals of 15‐25 inches were common across Minnesota, including Hennepin County.
The long duration of the storm, combined with its rapid onset and its severity contributed to
1/22/1917 16.0 3/4/1985 16.7
3/29/1924 12.0 3/31/1985 14.7
3/13/1940 15.6 12/1/1985 15.9
11/12/1940 16.7 11/1/1991 26.7
3/23/1952 14.1 11/30/1991 14.3
3/12/1962 12.7 3/9/1999 16.0
3/18/1965 12.2 12/11/2010 17.1
3/23/1966 13.6 2/21/2011 13.8
Surface pressure chart on November 11, 1940
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
175
extreme losses, including 49 deaths in Minnesota alone‐ many of whom were stranded motorists
who could not navigate the enormous snow drifts that were up to 15 feet high in open sections
of Hennepin County. Over a dozen of the dead were hunters who were dressed for pleasant
weather and were caught off‐guard and stranded on islands in the Mississippi River. One train
derailed, two were involved in a head‐on collision, and one could not complete its route because
of the snow. The regional death toll exceeds 150, with many of the non‐Minnesota deaths coming
from numerous capsized Great lakes vessels.
“Storm of the Century”, January 10‐12, 1975.
Formed by a then‐record‐setting low pressure system, this storm only produced 4‐8” of snow in
the Twin Cities but hit areas to the west and north much harder. There, hurricane‐force winds
gusts and blinding snowfall were common, with accumulations of up to 27 inches and drifts of 10‐
20 feet in open country. Ice accumulated over one inch in parts of southwestern and southern
Minnesota, and the combination of ice, heavy snow, and severe winds produced thousands of
power and telephone outages.
The storm claimed the lives of 35 Minnesotans, 21 of whom suffered heart attacks. The Red Cross
provided food and shelter to over 17,000 people. Despite the heavy losses, the storm was well
anticipated, and forecasts are credited with keeping the casualty toll in check.
Back‐to‐Back Record‐Breakers, January 20‐22, 1982.
A low‐pressure system interacting with an exceptionally air mass in retreat produced a broad
swath of heavy snow over much of Minnesota on January 20. Widespread daily totals of 10‐20
inches were common, and the Twin Cities recorded 17.1”, which broke the all‐time daily snowfall
record that had been set during the Armistice Day storm.
As the storm wound down and exited the region on the 21st, a more potent low‐pressure system
emerged from the Colorado Plains. This system intensified and moved into the region on the 22nd,
producing heavy snow, sleet, ice, thunder, and blizzard conditions, prompting the closure of
interstates 90 and 35 for part of the day. Snowfall totals of 10‐20 inches were again common, this
time over an even larger area. The Twin Cities recorded 17.2” on the 22nd, breaking the all‐time
snowfall record that had been set just two days earlier.
The extreme snow loads from these storms—in many cases greater than 30 inches—caused many
residential and commercial roof failures.
“Wall of White” blizzard, February 4, 1984.
A fast‐moving low‐pressure system and cold front charged through Minnesota, producing 2‐4
inches of light powdery snow and sustained winds more than 40 mph, with gusts as high as 75
mph.
The snow and wind were unexpected and moved southward at up to 50 mph. The sudden onset
of the blizzard caused severe traffic problems in rural areas, where visibilities fell to zero and snow
drifts covered many roads. Cars stalled in the snow, spun out, and motorists who ventured out
were subjected to subzero temperatures and 40‐60 mph winds.
The storm killed 21 people in a matter of hours, almost all from exposure, and almost all of whom
had been in stranded vehicles. This storm remains the most lethal single weather event in
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
176
Minnesota in the last 50 years.
Thanksgiving weekend Blizzard, 1985.
An unusually prolonged and widespread winter storm produced several waves of heavy snow over
Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin and the Dakotas between November 28th and December 1st, 1985.
In the Twin Cities, at
least 5 inches on three
consecutive days, with
each consecutive day
producing more snow
than the last—this
behavior is
unprecedented in the
area’s recorded history
and resulted in three‐
day totals in excess of
20 inches.
Although the snow
during the first two
days of the storm was
very heavy, it fell in
light winds as a cold air
mass remained in place
over the region. The
final wave of snow,
however, was
associated with a
powerful and
intensifying low
pressure system, and
produced a slight
warm‐up, followed by
strengthening winds
and rapidly falling
temperatures. The large geographical reach of this storm system overwhelmed Minnesota’s road
networks, and many state highways and local roads became impassible and had to be closed.
Thousands of travelers hoping to get into or out of Minnesota we forced to remain in place into
the following work week.
Halloween Blizzard, October 31 – November 2, 1991.
A low‐pressure system dove into southern Texas from eastern Colorado, picked up copious
moisture from the Gulf of Mexico, and then proceeded on a north‐northeast path, nearly
following the central portion of the Mississippi River, before passing through Wisconsin and out
over Lake Superior. This scenario and trajectory produced a historic period of heavy snow in the
Twin Cities and much of eastern Minnesota, followed by intense winds and plummeting
temperatures.
16”
12”
20”+
Snowfall pattern, From Nov 28 – Dec 1, 1985, modified from original, courtesy of
NOAA/NCDC, December 1985.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
177
The snow began around noon in the Twin
Cities and intensified throughout the day.
Five to 10 inches had already fallen by the
end of the day, and intense snowfall
continued throughout the overnight period.
By daybreak on November 1st, most of the
Twin Cities area already had well over a foot
of snow on the ground, with heavy snow still
falling. Many areas experienced a decrease in
snowfall intensity beginning in the late
morning, but snow nevertheless continued to
accumulate at a rate of an inch every 2‐3
hours throughout the afternoon and into the
evening.
Winds had picked up during the morning also,
and increased throughout the day, with
sustained speeds between 20 and 30 mph
with many gusts above 40 mph in the Twin
Cities. By mid‐evening, another band of
heavy snow spread across the area, as winds
reached peak speeds of 25‐40 mph with gusts
as high as 50 mph. Whiteout conditions
permeated the entirety of Hennepin County
during this period.
Snow continued at a lighter pace into the 2nd and even the 3rd of November, but most of the
snow had fallen, with 25‐30” totals falling on through the event.
The storm prompted school closings on both Friday November 1, and Monday November 4th in
some districts, as snow removal efforts were significantly behind schedule. The storm broke daily
and all‐time snowfall records in the Twin Cities, and in its aftermath, the earliest subzero
temperatures on record were observed.
Dome Teflon Roof #3 Snowstorm and Blizzard, December 10‐12, 2010.
A very potent winter storm developed over South Dakota and Nebraska on Friday, December
10th, then strengthened as it moved into Iowa through Saturday, December 11th. Moisture
surged into the Upper Mississippi River Valley ahead of the system on Friday, and precipitation
pushed into the region during the overnight hours. Both coverage and intensity increased during
the day on Saturday, and winds increased to 25‐40 mph with higher gusts by afternoon.
Snowfall totals from Halloween Blizzard. Courtesy of
Minnesota DNR State Climatology Office
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
178
Very heavy snow accompanied this system, with widespread totals between 12 and 24 inches.
The Twin Cities recorded 17.1 inches, making it the fifth largest snowstorm on record, and the
largest in December. For the third time in 30 years, the excessive snow load ripped and then
collapsed the Teflon roof of the Metrodome.
There have been no other incidents that are within the scope of this plan.
4.3.11.8. Future trends/likelihood of occurrence B1e
Research on the future of winter storms in Minnesota is lacking, but recent trends indicate a tendency
towards increases in the size of the largest snowfall events. However, this increase is not yet statistically
significant.
Climate change on one hand is causing a rapid warming of winter, and on another hand is putting more
water vapor into the atmosphere. Therefore, it is plausible that snowstorm intensity could increase, even
as seasonal snowfall decreases. However, using data from the Twin cities and Minnesota in general, there
is no evidence that seasonal snowfall is decreasing, even though significant winter warming is well
underway. It is possible that the current trend of an increase in high‐end snowfall events will continue.
Using the Twin Cities snowfall record from 1900‐2015, a daily snowfall of just of six inches can be expected
annually. The 10‐year snowfall amount for a calendar day is just over 12 inches. These values can be
analyzed for durations of up to 7 days and return periods of up to 100 years.
Snowfall totals from December 10-12, 2010, storm. Courtesy of NWS
Chanhassen
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
179
Snowfall amounts for a given event duration and return period, based on Twin Cities data from 1900‐
2015.
Using the same data somewhat differently, we can assess the expected frequency of common daily
snowfall amounts.
Frequency with which a daily snowfall total at a point in Hennepin County will equal or exceed a given
amount:
4.3.11.9. Indications and Forecasting
The Twin Cities/Chanhassen forecast office of the National Weather Service is the official forecasting
authority for major winter weather events affecting Hennepin County. High‐intensity winter storms are
usually well anticipated by the numerical weather prediction models, often up to a week in advance, and
forecasters tend to have high awareness of potentially dangerous winter conditions two days or more
before they develop.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
180
Warning Products Remarks
Blizzard
Warning
Sustained wind or frequent gusts greater than
or equal to 35 mph accompanied by falling
and/or blowing snow, frequently reducing
visibility to less than 1/4 mile for three hours
or more.
A major life safety hazard is ongoing or
imminent. Danger is greatest for those
traveling or caught outdoors. May be issued
2‐4 times per year in open areas of far
southern and western Minnesota. Very rare
in Hennepin County; one was November 1‐2,
1991.
Winter Storm
Warning
Significant and dangerous winter weather is
expected, generally within 24 hours. Six or
more inches of snow, not to exceed 48 hours,
half an inch of sleet and/or forecaster
discretion: a combination of snow, sleet,
freezing rain, blowing snow, and/or wind
leading to significant impacts.
This product spans a large range, from
heavy snow events with little or no wind, to
major wind‐driven events that produce
near‐blizzard conditions. Typically, 2‐4
issued for Hennepin County per winter.
Snow Squall
Warning
The occurrence of snow squalls (short bursts
of intense snow) meeting or exceeding one or
both of the following conditions:
Visibility 1/4 mile or less in
snow with sub‐freezing road
temperatures. Often
accompanied by wind gusts
greater than 30 mph.
Plunging temperatures
sufficient to produce a flash
freeze, along with a significant
reduction in visibility from
falling and/or blowing snow.
Additional factors to consider:
Time of day.
Highways and interstates
impacted.
These are polygon‐based warnings that last
usually an hour or less. Larger and longer
events are covered by Winter Storm
Warnings.
Severity tags:
General (no tag): Used
frequently. Snow squall
conditions are expected or
observed, but mitigating
actions, combined with societal
context, will reduce the threat
to safe travel.
"SIGNIFICANT" tag: Used only
when suspected or observed
A quick onset snow band with intense
snowfall with potential impacts.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
181
Warning Products Remarks
conditions, both meteorological
and non‐meteorological,
suggest a substantial threat to
safe travel, such that WEA is
warranted to alert all devices in
the path of the squall.
Watch Product Name
Winter Storm
Watch
Significant and dangerous winter weather is
possible, generally within 72 hours. Blizzard
conditions with visibility less than a quarter
mile due to falling and/or blowing snow and
frequent wind gusts to 35 mph, for three
hours or more. Six or more inches of snow
with an event, not to exceed 48 hours in
length. A quarter inch of ice. A half inch of
sleet. Forecaster discretion: a combination of
snow, sleet, freezing rain, blowing snow
and/or wind leading to significant impacts.
As certainty about an event approach, it
may be “upgraded” to a warning. Many
become lower‐standing Advisories, and
about 1/10 Watches end up with no
Warning or Advisory product.
Advisory Product Name
Winter
Weather
Advisory
Winter weather that causes inconvenience
but is not dangerous if proper caution is
exercised. 3‐6 inches of snow. Bowing snow,
causing local visibility reductions. Less than a
half inch of sleet. Less than a quarter inch of
ice. Forecast discretion: a combination of light
snow, sleet, freezing rain, blowing snow,
and/or wind leading to impacts.
In ideal situations, progression of NWS products used will include a Hazardous Weather Outlook, Watches,
and then Warnings or Advisories.
4.3.11.10. Critical Values & Thresholds
The baseline for a winter storm product (i.e., Watch or Warning) is generally 6 inches in 12 hours or 8
inches in 24 hours. The baseline for an Advisory is generally 3 inches in 12 hours. However, NWS
forecasters may issue Watches, Warnings and Advisories at lesser thresholds if other hazards or concerns
warrant a different standard.
4.3.11.11. Preparedness
Before the storm strikes, homes, offices, and vehicles should be stocked with an emergency kit.
At home or work, primary concerns are primary concerns are loss of heat, power and telephone service,
and a shortage of supplies in prolonged or especially severe and disruptive events. Essential supplies
include:
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
182
Flashlight and extra batteries
Battery‐powered NOAA Weather Radio and portable radio to receive emergency information.
Extra food and water such as dried fruit, nuts and granola bars, and other food requiring no
cooking or refrigeration.
Extra prescription medicine
Baby items such as diapers and formula
First‐aid supplies
Heating fuel
Emergency heat source: properly ventilated fireplace, wood stove, or space heater
Fire extinguisher, smoke alarm; test smoke alarms once a month to ensure they work properly.
Extra pet food and warm shelter for pets
Back‐up generator (optional) but never run a generator in an enclosed space.
Carbon monoxide detector
Outside vents should be clear of leaves, and debris, and cleared of snow after the storm.
In vehicles, the supplies in GRAPHIC 4.3.11A are essential for winter storm survival.
GRAPHIC 4.3.11A Source: NWS Winter Storm Safety (http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/winter/before.
shtml)
If traveling on the road for a significant length of time, be aware of the weather forecast, especially if you
will have long drives with large distances between towns. Stay "connected" via television, radio, NOAA
Weather Radio, or social media. Major winter storms rarely occur without warning, although road travel
can subject motorists to rapidly changing, sometimes unexpected weather conditions. Thus, check
forecasts throughout your route each day before your leave, and plan accordingly.
4.3.11.12. Mitigation
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
183
Education and Awareness Programs
● Vehicle fleet crews and others who spend substantial time on the road should be familiar
with NWS warning products, jurisdictions, and be familiar with how to obtain pertinent
information. All professional drivers should carry winter weather survival supplies.
● Homeowners and commercial properties should be aware of snow load safety and best
practices for preventing roof damage. See FEMA document P‐957, “Snow Load Safety
Guide” (January 2013)
● Members of the general public should understand the risks posed by winter storms, and
should review the information available at https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/hsem/weather‐
awareness‐preparedness/Pages/winter‐storms.aspx.
4.3.11.13. Recovery
Recovery from a major snow event can take days, or even weeks if it is complicated by a combination of
cold weather, power outages, fallen trees, ice, or snow. In forested areas, logging activities may be
significantly impacted, and fuel loads may exacerbate the potential for wildland fire. In addition to power
outages, persistent wind loading on structures has at times caused gas line ruptures.
4.3.11.14. References
Minnesota DNR State Climatology Office, 75th Anniversary of the Armistice Day Blizzard,
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/armistice_day_blizzard.html
Minnesota DNR State Climatology Office, Tornado of March 31, 2014,
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/tornadoes140331.html
National Weather Service, Winter Safety Home Page, http://www.nws.noaa.gov/os/winter/
National Weather Service, Winter Storms: The Deceptive Killers, ARC 4467 NOAA/PA 200160, 12 pp.
Available at http://www.nws.noaa.gov/os/winter/resources/Winter_Storms2008.pdf
National Weather Service‐ La Crosse Forecast Office, Armistice Day Storm ‐ November 11, 1940,
http://www.weather.gov/arx/nov111940
National Weather Service‐La Crosse Forecast Office, Blizzard / Winter Storm of December 10‐12, 2010,
http://www.weather.gov/arx/dec1110
Schwartz, Robert M., and Thomas W. Schmidlin. "Climatology of blizzards in the conterminous United
States, 1959‐2000." Journal of Climate 15.13 (2002): 1765‐1772.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
184
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
185
4.3.12. Hazard Assessment: WINDS, NON‐CONVECTIVE HIGH
4.3.12.1. Definition
Non‐convective high winds are rare, long‐lasting,
sustained events that can pose significant life
safety risks and produce widespread damage over
a large area, while originating from sources
unrelated to thunderstorms (i.e., not related to
tornadoes or thunderstorm downbursts). In the
Upper Midwest and most of the US, they form in
association with intense and/or rapidly intensifying
mid‐latitude cyclones (low pressure systems).
“Wake lows” developing behind thunderstorms
have been observed to produce relatively
prolonged bouts of non‐convective strong winds in
Minnesota‐‐sometimes resulting in damage‐‐ but
these events are best considered within the
spectrum of consequences and cascading effects
resulting from derechos and other severe
thunderstorms events.
The most common scenario in Minnesota, occurring 1‐3 times per year on a statewide basis, is for a
prolonged (multi‐hour) period of sustained 30‐45 mph winds, with frequent gusts to 60 mph, and isolated
gusts as high as 70 mph. These events tend to result in sporadic minor structural damage, and occasionally
cause isolated injuries or even deaths.
A more dangerous class of events occurs roughly once or twice per decade in Minnesota, and produces a
pocket of enhanced wind speeds, often sustained above 45 mph for several hours, with gusts exceeding
hurricane force. These events produce massive wind loadings that can result in significant infrastructural
and property damage, and the most extreme among them yield death and injury rates that resemble
those of tornado outbreaks.
Unfortunately, the meteorological differences between these two classes of events are quite subtle, and
identifying the potential for the higher‐impact extreme cases remains a forecasting challenge. In fact,
every instance of them on record in the Upper Midwest has been under‐forecast, in some cases
significantly. Like derechos, there is no specific National Weather Service warning product for them. Most
events in Minnesota have occurred during High Wind Warnings, within lower‐priority Wind Advisories,
and even during Blizzards Warnings. Those latter cases will be considered under Blizzards and will be
discussed only briefly here.
Further complicating matters, no standardized database or method for cataloging non‐convective
extreme winds exists. Therefore, precise statistics on areal extent, duration, and total impact are lacking.
4.3.12.2. Range of magnitude
Maximum event (Hennepin): measured gust 89 mph at MSP on October 10, 1949
Maximum event (non‐Hennepin): measured 100 mph at Rochester on October 10, 1949
Maximum duration: 36 hours, Wisconsin, October 26‐27, 2010
Satellite image of the October 26, 2010 cyclone that set
low pressure records in Minnesota and produced 24 hours
of non‐convective severe‐threshold winds covering over
100,000 square miles.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
186
Maximum sporadic wind damage footprint: 1000 mi long x 450 mi wide, November 10, 1998,
and October 26‐27, 2010
Maximum extreme wind damage footprint (MN): 400 mi long x 200 mi wide, October 10, 1949
Event
Type
Frequency
per decade
Maximum
sustained
winds
(mph)
Maximum
wind
gusts
(mph)
Damaging
wind
duration
(hr)
Extreme
wind
duration
(hr)
Footprint
High
Wind
10‐30 30‐45 55‐70 4‐8 NA Isolated minor
structural damage
covering an area the
size of MN.
Injuries/deaths in 5‐
10% of events
Extreme
Wind
1‐2 45+ 75‐100 6‐24 3‐6 Isolated minor
structural damage
covering several
states. Significant
infrastructural and
property damage
covering dozens of
counties. Numerous
injuries/deaths per
event common.
4.3.12.3. Spectrum of Consequences B2b
Non‐convective winds killed nine Minnesotans between 1980 and 2005, with several other deaths
possible between 2006 and 2014. Estimates suggest 20‐40 additional deaths occurred between 1940 and
1979. Thus, with at least 30 deaths (and possibly as many as 55) since 1940, non‐convective extreme winds
clearly present a life safety risk on par with those of tornadoes and convective storm hazards.
Research has shown that non‐convective wind fatalities are like derecho fatalities, in that the majority of
them occur outdoors, in boats, or in vehicles. Only 5% of documented US non‐convective wind deaths
between 1980 and 2005 occurred within structures. By contrast, over 70% of tornado‐related deaths
occur within buildings or homes, illustrating that people are less likely to seek shelter during non‐
convective high winds than during tornadoes.
Summary of typical versus extreme non‐convective wind events
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
187
Unlike derechos, the peak frequencies of non‐convective extreme winds occur during the mid‐spring and
especially mid‐fall transition seasons. This timing minimizes the number of outdoor recreational activities
and reduces the potential exposure to wind‐related hazards. The notable exceptions are 1) Minnesota’s
fishing opener, typically during the first half of May, at the end of the spring risk period, and 2) Minnesota’s
hunting seasons, which span the heart of the peak risk in October and November.
Boaters face substantial risks during non‐convective high wind events. The reduced friction of open water
often increases wind speeds and wave heights and threatens to capsize boats. Once overturned or
submerged, a boat’s occupants will be subject to the seasonally cold water, which poses serious risks for
hypothermia and eventual drowning. Given the harsh conditions, rescue operations can be difficult, if not
impossible. Several of the known deaths during the Armistice Day storm of 1940 were from skiffs that
capsized in the 40‐60 mph winds, hours before snow began to fall.
The prolonged nature of non‐convective high wind events means that hunters and others spending time
outdoors face extended risk exposure from falling trees. In urban or built‐up areas, falling trees and power
lines are the most typical sources of risk. During extreme events, urban inhabitants can be injured or killed
by flying debris. In rural areas, outbuildings are often damaged, and barns frequently collapse.
Sources and locations of US non‐convective wind fatalities, modified from Ashley and Black 2008 (see references)
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
188
Occupants of cars and trucks also are vulnerable to being hit by falling trees and utility poles. Further, high
profile vehicles such as semi‐trailer trucks, buses, and sport utility vehicles are frequently blown over
during sustained non‐convective wind events.
Though they only make up 5% of the 1980‐2005 deaths shown above, construction sites may make larger
proportional contributions during periods of high economic growth, when the number of large projects
multiplies. Workers have been and can be blown from ledges or scaffolding and bombarded by loose
materials.
Because they are so rare, the Twin Cities area has not experienced the consequences of a major non‐
convective wind event in several decades. Examination of the event in 1949, combined with what is known
about derechos, suggests that a current‐era repeat would be catastrophic. The total population exposed—
outdoors, on the streets, in traffic—would likely be several times larger than in 1949. Power disruptions
would cover the entire metropolitan area, and thousands of roads and street segments would be blocked
by fallen trees, wires, and utility poles. The breadth of an extreme system, acting on our complex and
dense concentration of overhead distribution feeders, would necessitate a massive temporary workforce
to restore service after an event. Outages would likely last days, which could be particularly dangerous if
winter conditions followed the high winds.
4.3.12.4. Potential for Cascading Effects
Non‐convective high winds can occupy a large portion of any strong extratropical cyclone, and as a result
can follow, precede, or be accompanied by a wide range of weather conditions. The parent intense low‐
pressure systems frequently produce severe thunderstorms and tornadoes in areas that are later affected
by the non‐convective high or extreme winds. In some cases, the dangerous winds stretch far
northwestward, into the portion of the cyclone where heavy snow is falling or has fallen. In these
situations, severe blizzard conditions develop, and the winds function as one of many mutually enhancing
hazards.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
189
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
Considering that thunderstorm hazards tend to be distributed in the southeast quadrant of a cyclone, that
blizzards tend to occupy the northwestern quadrant, and that any system capable of both will tend to
move northeastward through the region, it is unlikely that any given location will experience severe
thunderstorms, non‐convective extreme winds, and blizzard conditions from the same system. However,
a powerful system on November 11, 1911, did just that, producing killer tornadoes in Iowa, Wisconsin,
Illinois, and Missouri, followed by record‐setting temperature drops of 60‐80 degrees in 6‐10 hours with
blizzard conditions and wind gusts as high as 75 mph. This event is a true singularity in the central US, in
that nothing else like it has ever been recorded.
Perhaps the most common scenario for any one location in the Upper Midwest is that the extreme winds
follow a period of inclement but otherwise non‐hazardous weather and are followed by a return to non‐
hazardous weather as well.
The scenario a given event follows is determined by both relative position with respect to the center of
low pressure, and the depth of cold and/or warm air and moisture available to the system as it moves
through the region. Those factors, in turn, influence the likelihood of cascading effects. In Scenario 1, the
primary impacts are damage and power outages, and weather conditions in the storm’s wake generally
will not further escalate the situation. In all other scenarios, there is some potential for combinations of
the following cascading effects.
Severe weather – Virtually all known non‐convective extreme wind‐producing systems in the
Upper Midwest have also produced severe weather hazards somewhere within the storm’s warm
sector, which is in its southeast quadrant. Incidentally, concentrations of a system’s most extreme
non‐convective winds typically follow the cold front into the southeast quadrant as well. Thus, if
a sufficiently intense system produces tornadoes or straight‐line winds (both of which can form
in the high‐shear environments of these systems if enough instability is present), some of the
Scenario 1
Non‐hazardous
weather Extreme winds
Non‐hazardous
weather
Scenario 2
Severe
convective
storms
Extreme winds
Non‐hazardous
weather
Scenario 3
Non‐hazardous
weather Extreme winds
Blizzard &
dangerously
cold
Scenario 4
Non‐hazardous
weather Extreme winds
Dangerously
cold
The four generalized scenarios in which non‐convective extreme winds most frequently occur in the Upper Midwest. It
should be noted that a single system may produce different scenarios at different locations. The Armistice Day storm
1940 generated each of the four scenarios listed.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
190
areas affected will be at risk for non‐convective high or extreme winds, generally beginning 6‐24
hours after the severe weather. This occurred in south‐central and southeast Minnesota on
December 15, 2021, when severe thunderstorm winds to 75 mph or greater knocked out power
and were followed by non‐convective winds of 60‐80 mph several hours later.
In these situations, any debris generated by the severe weather will have the potential to become
airborne and further scattered by the non‐convective winds, prolonging the hazard exposure by
hours. Moreover, the sustained wind loadings will further weaken or damage already‐
compromised structures, causing the potential for further collapse. The winds will also threaten
to blow down trees and power structures previously spared. Lastly, these intense non‐convective
winds will add a layer of danger to ongoing search and rescue operations.
Blizzard – Although the very strongest winds tend to wrap into what had been the warm sector
and are often removed from the area of heavy snow, the broad area of strong and even dangerous
winds can reach back into areas experiencing (or previously experiencing) winter weather
conditions. In these cases, the wind hazards are compounded by falling temperatures, reduced
visibilities, and slippery or obstructed roads. Winds combined with heavy snowfall can knock
down trees, power lines and power poles, blocking streets and cutting some residents off from
their communities.
Cold – Even areas that do not experience blizzard conditions may see rapid temperature drops
behind the cold front. Because these events usually occur during the transition seasons, the
extent and depth of the cold air tend to be minimized. However, temperatures can fall near or
below zero, and wind chill temperatures can fall to ‐25 or lower. The cold weather risks are
greatest in areas that had lost power or utility service from extreme winds, as frostbite and
hypothermia become serious concerns.
Flash Flooding – Most of the systems capable of extreme winds move quickly enough that
precipitation amounts are kept under 2 inches. However, there have been instances of prolonged
heavy rainfall and at least minor flooding, raising the possibility of a joint flood/non‐convective
wind disaster at some point in the future, though none have been recorded in Minnesota. The
force of moving water combined with sustained strong winds would easily overwhelm stranded
vehicles and would significantly hamper rescue operations.
Wildland Fires – The swaths of trees toppled by non‐convective high winds can increase fuel loads
on forests and escalating the risk of wildland fire. Additionally, although most non‐convective
wind systems produce some precipitation, many of the extreme winds come through “dry,” and
even in fair conditions. If the system passes through during a drought or other condition with
unusually dry vegetation, the winds could easily enhance wildfire risk. Any existing fires would
have the potential to spread rapidly and uncontrollably.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
191
4.3.12.5. Geographic Scope of Hazard B1c
A typical extreme wind‐producing non‐
convective event may affect well over
100,000 square miles with wind damage
and may produce extreme impacts over
tens of thousands of square miles. The
total footprint may resemble those of
derechos, but the time signature is very
different because non‐convective events
often affect large areas simultaneously
and for much longer durations than
convective weather systems.
Non‐convective extreme winds have been
recorded in every state, but their impacts
are greatest in heavily populated areas,
even though their frequencies and
magnitudes may be greatest on the open
Plains of the central US. The highest death
rates per unit area are found in the
northeastern US, between Maryland and
New York state, where “nor’easters” can
expose large, dense populations to hurricane‐force (or greater) winds, and along the Pacific coast. Death
rates in these regions are 10 times higher than in Minnesota and the Upper Midwest, because of higher
frequencies of intense low‐pressure systems, the complex topography found between the mountains and
coasts induce wind‐enhancing terrain effects, and the much greater population concentrations.
Within the Midwest, Minnesota appears to lie on the northwestern side of a risk corridor, which
maximizes near Chicago.
4.3.12.6. Chronologic patterns (seasons, cycles, rhythm)
Non‐convective extreme winds associated with strong low‐pressure areas are most common during the
fall and spring transition seasons, when the polar jet stream’s mean track is near the Upper Midwest and
when continental temperature gradients are strong. Although strong cyclone development is more
common in spring than in fall, the conditions favoring explosive intensification are more common during
autumn, and thus, October and November have by far the highest frequency for non‐convective extreme
winds.
4.3.12.7. Historical data/previous occurrence B1d
The record of non‐convective extreme wind events in Minnesota is incomplete, owing to the lack of
adequate instrumentation, documentation, and categorization. Knowing the true frequency of extreme
winds in Minnesota would help estimate the likely recurrence of impacts on the modern landscape and
population. The following events are those known to have produced significant non‐convective wind
impacts in Minnesota and the surrounding region.
Number of non‐convective high wind fatalities in the lower 48
United States during the period 1980‐2005. Source:
http://earthzine.org/2011/06/04/death‐from‐a‐clear‐blue‐sky‐
extreme‐non‐convective‐high‐winds/ (modified from Ashley and
Black 2008)
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
192
The Armistice Day storm of November 11, 1940
Is best remembered as high‐impact, high‐mortality blizzard, but the extreme winds prior to the
snow were responsible for much of the cascading disaster that followed. Extreme non‐convective
winds capsized skiffs used by hunters in southern Minnesota, and produced impossible navigation
on the Mississippi River, which forced at least 12 hunters to shelter on islands, where they
ultimately froze to death. The winds wrecked large vessels on Lakes Michigan and Superior,
resulting in 59 fatalities. From Minnesota east into Michigan and Ohio, winds were sustained at
35 mph or greater for several hours, with many stations recording average speeds more than 50
mph. Gusts of 70‐80 mph are believed to have been common throughout the region. The
strongest winds were over
Wisconsin, Illinois, and western
Michigan, to the south and
southeast of the intensifying low‐
pressure center. The winds blew
down utility poles, and cut power
and communications to much of
Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois,
and Michigan, creating a
dangerous situation as
temperatures fell into the teens
and single digits.
The event produced all four
extreme wind scenarios
described previously in different
parts of the region. Across much
of Wisconsin, Lake Michigan and
Lower Michigan, the dangerous,
prolonged winds of 40‐60 mph
(gusting up to 80 mph) were the only significant hazard posed by the storm. Over Iowa and Illinois,
tornadoes and severe thunderstorms swept through the area during the morning, and then non‐
convective sustained winds of 25‐45 mph (gusting 55‐70 mph) blew for 8‐12 hours following the
passage of the strong cold front. Over western Iowa, much of Minnesota, northwestern Wisconsin
and the eastern Dakotas, non‐hazardous weather gave way to strong winds gusting up to 70 mph,
severe blizzard conditions, and dramatically falling temperatures; these conditions stranded and
killed at least two dozen motorists. Lastly, the central and western Dakotas had wind gusts to 65
mph, little or no snowfall, but dangerously cold temperatures.
On October 10, 1949
The most severe non‐convective wind event on record in Minnesota struck most of the state and
produced over 75,000 square miles of derecho‐level damage. Minneapolis recorded seven
straight hours of sustained winds above 40 mph, three hours of sustained winds above 50 mph,
and two hours of gusts exceeding 75 mph, including a maximum gust of 89 mph. In Rochester, a
100‐mph wind gust was recorded. Boat works facilities were demolished on Lake Minnetonka, as
well as numerous other Minnesota lakes; docks were destroyed, and sailboats were piled onto
the shores of Minneapolis lakes; windows were blown out of homes, storefronts, and office
buildings; and many brick buildings partially collapsed. In downtown Minneapolis, large
signboards were twisted, the 65‐foot chimney of the Sheridan Building fell onto and severely
Surface weather map, Nov 11, 1940. Shaded area represents
region of wind impacts. Dark area represents hurricane‐force
wind gusts. Modified from La Crosse NWS.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
193
injured several people, and workers
on upper floors of the Foshay Tower
fell ill from motion sickness due to the
extreme swaying of the building. The
winds inflicted destruction or severe
damage upon barns, windmills, water
towers, and grain elevators
throughout rural Minnesota. The
event claimed 27 lives region‐wide
(four in MN), and severely injured
hundreds (at least 100 in MN). Many
of the casualties were caused by
blunt trauma from flying or falling
objects, and lacerations from flying
glass. Northern States Power counted
approximately 4800 broken lines and
600 broken poles in southern
Minnesota alone. An additional 48
broken poles were counted in the
Fergus Falls area. In some areas,
outages lasted into early November. Losses exceeded $100 million USD (2014) at a time when
there was far less infrastructure and property than there is today.
This storm system produces a band of occasionally heavy rain that in some cases fell into the
howling winds, producing visibilities near zero at times. The rain itself otherwise had a marginal
impact (no significant flooding, no damage), and although severe weather was reported well to
the south of the region, no other significant hazards preceded or followed the extraordinary winds
in Minnesota and the Upper Midwest.
On November 10, 1998,
An explosively intensifying low pressure system tracked from Kansas to western Lake Superior,
producing a wide array of dangerous weather conditions, punctuated by a deadly, long‐lasting
bout of non‐convective extreme winds. The storm set the statewide low‐pressure record (at the
time), with 962.7 millibars registered at both Albert Lea and Austin.
Although most of Minnesota had widespread 30‐50 mph winds, with gusts up to 75 mph, the most
devastating winds stretched from central Iowa, through the majority of Wisconsin, and into Upper
and western Michigan. These areas experienced up to 18 hours of sustained 35‐50 mph winds
with frequent gusts of 65‐75 mph, and many gusts exceeding 85 mph, including a 93‐mph gust
recorded at the La Crosse NWS office. Wind gusts exceeded 85 mph over far southeastern
Minnesota.
Surface weather map, Oct 10, 1940. Shaded area represents
region of wind impacts. Dark area represents hurricane‐force
wind gusts Modified from Daily Weather Maps
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
194
The winds resulted in 10 deaths, 34
serious injuries, and at least $50
million USD (2014) in damages.
Wisconsin was hardest hit, but
impacts were severe in Minnesota,
where a school bus was blown of the
road, and hunters in the Paul Bunyan
State Forest were stranded in heavy
snow and high winds because dozens
of fallen trees blocked all possible
exits. Near Foxhome in northwestern
MN, 27 consecutive power poles were
snapped.
The Milwaukee and Green Bay, WI
National Weather Service offices
collected detailed information on the
storm. Some of the worst impacts (all
Wisconsin) included:
Green Lake Co: barn leveled on outskirts of Berlin. Shingles ripped off business in Green Lake.
Light poles bent by wind in Berlin.
Sauk Co: Shed demolished in Baraboo area. Tree fell on trailer near Lake Delton. Many trees
and power lines downed in eastern part of county near Wisconsin River, causing 1000
outages.
Columbia Co: 50‐year‐old woman killed when blown into Wisconsin River, where extreme
winds created powerful undercurrent. Semi‐truck tipped over on I‐94. Columbus, a home's
brick chimney damaged, and roof of balcony ripped off.
Iowa Co: elderly man near Cobb suffered head injury after being knocked down by a gust of
wind. Semi‐truck driver injured when vehicle flipped over by wind gust on Highway 80, just
north of Stephens. Five other semi roll‐overs in county. Apartment building and hotel in
Dodgeville sustained roof damage. New home under construction demolished. Barn collapsed
in rural Hollendale. New building destroyed near Spring Green.
Dane Co: 87‐year‐old man died after car blown into him on north side of Madison. Capitol
Square business had window blown in. Several businesses in Mt. Horeb sustained wind
damage. Roof torn off multi‐unit apartment building in Manona, and 4 other nearby buildings
also damaged. Two businesses in Stoughton damaged. 12 semi‐trucks flipped over in 10‐min
period on I‐90/94, and several more on US18/151 and Hwy 51. Several barns in county
damaged. Moored boats on Lake Kegonsa were pushed into each other, resulting in damage.
Lafayette Co: Large portion of Darlington High School roof ripped off. Elsewhere in county, 5
farm buildings destroyed, 15 more damaged. Five homes in county sustained damage due to
fallen trees, and 1 business suffered structural damage. Several county roads blocked by tree
debris.
Green Co: Semi roll‐overs reported on US 11/81, and Hwy 81 in town of Monroe. Airplane
flipped over at Brodhead airport. Silo roof blown off on County M. Damage inflicted on county
salt sheds in New Glarus and Brodhead. Approx. 5000 customers without power at one time.
Rock Co: Beloit, 25 large trees knocked down, damaging several homes. 1/3 of Janesville
Parker High School roof torn off. Evansville, two businesses with blown‐in windows, and siding
Surface weather map, 12:00 PM CST, Nov 10, 1998. Shaded
area represents region of wind impacts. Dark area represents
hurricane‐force wind gusts. Base map generated from
Plymouth State Weather Center.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
195
peeled off on 5 other buildings. Edgerton, 2 homes sustained damage from fallen trees, 5
businesses lost siding. Approx. 14,000 county electrical customers without power.
Fond du Lac Co: City of Fond du Lac, sheet metal and siding on a church steeple peeled off by
the wind, over 100 homes damaged. Eden, shed blown away. Two semis flipped by wind on
Hwy 41, and cars pushed or blown into ditch. Oakfield, roof of pig barn ripped off. 2800 county
electrical customers without power.
Sheboygan Co: woman in Sheboygan injured by flying glass debris after window blown out of
a business. Two other city businesses suffered roof/sheet metal damage. Barn near Plymouth
leveled. Semi‐truck tipped over on Hwy 23 west of Sunset Rd. Three homes in Sheboygan Falls
damaged by felled trees.
Dodge Co: scattered damage reported in all parts of county. Juneau, roof was ripped off
business building. Three semi‐trucks flipped over. Approx. 2000 county customers were
without electrical power at one time. Multiple‐vehicle accident near intersection of Hwy 151
and 16‐60 due to vehicles being pushed sideways by gusts.
Washington Co: Approx. 8000 customers lost electrical power. Two semi‐trucks flipped over
on Hwy 45, resulting in closure of road. County 911 center logged 54 calls for damage
assistance. Barn blown down on Hwy 28 near Kewaskum. Several schools closed early.
Ozaukee Co: Siding ripped off several homes and telephone poles snapped in Port
Washington. Belgium, about 1/4 of roof was torn off building under construction. Several
schools closed early in Mequon and Thiensville.
Jefferson Co: Ft. Atkinson woman injured after when blown into side of her home. Semi‐truck
driver injured when truck flipped over on I‐94 near Hwy 26 interchange. Another semi
overturned by a gust on US 18 near Hwy 89. At least 17 homes in county sustained damage
from tree debris. Many acres of corn crop flattened. Barn blown across Hwy 106 east of Ft.
Atkinson. Approx. 6000 customers lost electrical power. Concrete wall of new grocery store
In Ft. Atkinson, blown down.
Waukesha Co: Two women injured in Muskego when tree fell on car. New Berlin man injured
after motorized garbage cart rolled over by a wind gust. Hwy J, Pewaukee, driver injured after
tree fell on car. Approx. 15,000 customers lost electrical power. Semi‐truck flipped over by
gust on I‐94 near Hwy 83 interchange. At least 3 barns in county were badly damaged. In both
Muskego and Sussex, two new walls at school construction sites toppled. Construction site on
Hwy 36 near Burlington badly damaged. Several boats damaged on county lakes due to large
waves.
Milwaukee Co: 87‐year‐old man fell face‐first onto sidewalk when door he was opening blown
from his hand; went into coma and died November 16. Southridge Mall, woman sustained
head injury when blown over in parking lot. Hundreds of trees uprooted across county,
damaging dozens of homes, apartments, and businesses. 20,000 customers lost electrical
power. Traffic lights knocked out of service at 75 intersections. A train sustained damage from
tree debris while moving through northern part of county. Significant damage to gates,
ground equipment, and signs at General Mitchell Int'l Airport.
Walworth Co: Semi‐truck driver injured after vehicle flipped over on Hwy 11 near Racine Co.
line. Roof damage to at least 6 businesses and nursing homes in county. Semi‐truck rollover
on I‐43 near the Hwy X interchange resulted in spilled fuel that closed road. Several
Whitewater buildings and a stadium damaged. Walls blown down at construction sites in East
Troy and Elkhorn.
Racine Co: Woman injured when traffic signal light blew onto her vehicle. Racine, woman
injured when tree fell on home. Police officer injured by flying debris while out on a call.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
196
Construction wall blown down. Brown's Lake, shed destroyed. Several other homes and
businesses sustained damage from trees.
Kenosha Co: 16‐year‐old boy electrocuted in Bristol as he tried to escape after a wind gust
toppled a live electrical line on his car. Near Salem on Hwy 50, small car partially airborne by
wind gusts and blown into ditch. Semi‐truck was flipped over on I‐94.
Brown Co: Kaukauna, several dozen homes evacuated when top of water tower holding
225,000 gallons blew off. Green Bay, Interstate 43 Tower Bridge closed because of multiple
semi blow‐overs.
The record‐breaking extra‐tropical cyclone October 25‐27, 2010
This system brought a widespread severe weather event and serial derecho to the lower‐Midwest,
followed by a massive, 2‐day non‐convective high wind event that stretched from the Dakotas
and Nebraska to Michigan. The sea‐level pressure of 955.2 millibars at Bigfork, MN shattered the
previous state record set by the November 10, 1998, storm system. The reading at Bigfork is also
the lowest on record anywhere in the Central US and is a mere 0.2 millibars from the record for
contiguous US.
Despite the extraordinarily low pressure, the enormous area occupied by non‐convective high
winds, and the unusually long duration, this event lacked the wind severity of those in 1949 and
1998. 60 mph gusts were observed at most stations in the storm's 8‐state footprint, but not a
single station recorded an 80‐mph gust. The winds produced nearly 500,000 power outages (at
one point or another), toppled thousands of trees and power lines, but produced fewer casualties
(2 fatalities and 8 injuries), and less property and infrastructural damage than the other systems.
This result is not well understood, because wind speed and impacts tend to be highly and strongly
correlated with the strength of the cyclone, as represented by its lowest sea‐level pressure. It is
possible that this event, for a currently unknown reason, failed to produce or incorporate the
dynamical and mesoscale features that typically produce extreme winds in high‐intensity
systems.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
197
The October 2010 event was also
unusual because it produced pockets
of excessive rainfall. Typically, strong
regional winds aloft with these
systems prevent thunderstorms from
training and ensure that precipitation
is not prolonged. Thus, the highest
precipitation total is usually kept
below 2 inches. In this case however,
numerous clusters of thunderstorms
formed just east of the advancing low
center, producing widespread heavy
rainfall. As the cyclone reached peak
intensity, its forward motion slowed
dramatically, and heavy stratiform
precipitation (eventually changing to
heavy snow) impacted many of the
same areas that received repetitive
thunderstorms. Portions of northeast
Minnesota received over four inches
Locations of non‐convective 58 mph or greater gusts, cyclone center, and other hazards. Courtesy NWS Duluth.
Rainfall associated with October 25‐27 non‐convective high wind event.
Courtesy NWS Duluth.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
198
of precipitation, with isolated reports of over 5 inches, resulting in flooded intersections, submerged
roads, and minor damage to businesses and residences. The locations receiving the heaviest rainfall were
in the same position with respect to the cyclone center as areas that often receive the most intense non‐
convective winds; fortunately, however, this storm did not produce such winds, and there were few or no
compound flooding/extreme wind effects.
December 15, 2021
An unusual winter situation unfolded
during this evening as a muggy airmass
and a developing cyclone produced
intense thunderstorms that raced
northeastward from Nebraska into
southeastern Minnesota, producing 22
tornadoes in the state, along with
extensive straight‐line wind damage.
After the storms cleared the area, the
intensifying low‐pressure system
responsible for them approached, with
an “eye‐like” center of circulation and
a large area of strong non‐convective
winds. The winds moved into the same
areas damaged by the severe thunderstorms. Rochester, for instance, recorded 77 mph wind gusts with
the severe thunderstorms, and then three hours of 55‐70 mph non‐convective gusts, with another peak
of 77 mph just before midnight local time. Throughout southern Minnesota, non‐convective wind gusts
reached 60‐75 mph, producing tens of thousands of power outages as a much colder air mass settled into
the region.
The non‐convective winds were quite strong, especially considering the severe weather barrage they had
followed, but the peak winds remained below the levels of those witnessed in 1949 and 1998, likely
because this cyclone was not quite as intense, and because it was still gaining strength as the strongest
winds passed through Minnesota.
4.3.12.8. Future trends/likelihood of occurrence B1e
Non‐convective high winds are relatively rare, occurring, on average, fewer than three times per year in
Minnesota. Extreme events are even rarer, and only affect some part of the state approximately once or
twice per decade. Open areas of the state in the west and south are more conducive to extreme
thunderstorm winds than other areas, but extreme non‐convective winds do not appear to follow that
pattern. If anything, extreme winds, and especially the impacts of them, are slightly more common in the
hilly and tree‐filled eastern parts of the state than on the open prairies.
The frequency of non‐convective extreme wind in Minnesota is directly tied to the frequency of intense
mid‐latitude or extratropical cyclones. Unfortunately, the physical link between explosive cyclogenesis
(the process that leads to intense low‐pressure systems) and human‐caused climate change, is not well
understood, so research into the future of these systems has been inconclusive, with results depicting all
possible scenarios.
Eye‐like feature seen in eastern Nebraska on December 15, 2021, as
severe thunderstorms advance through southeastern Minnesota and
intense non‐convective winds move northeastward with the circulation.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
199
Consultation of all available research suggests that extreme non‐convective winds have a frequency like
high‐end tornado events, with recurrence intervals on the order of multiple decades within Hennepin
County.
4.3.12.9. Indications and Forecasting
Forecasting authority for non‐convective high wind events rests with local National Weather Service
forecast offices. High‐intensity mid‐latitude cyclones are usually well anticipated by the numerical
weather prediction models. As a result, forecasters tend to have high awareness of potentially strong
winds 2 days or more before they develop. In ideal situations, progression of NWS products used will
include a Hazardous Weather Outlook, High Wind Watch, and High Wind Warning. In some cases,
damaging and even deadly winds have arisen within Wind Advisories.
Despite high awareness of strong regional wind potential, most non‐convective high wind events in the
region, and all extreme events, have been under‐forecast. As a result, the impacts have come as surprises.
An after‐action report from the disastrous 1949 event concluded that forecasters had "little evidence by
which the severity might have been forecast." Although forecasting techniques have improved
dramatically since that time, underestimation is still a concern. The November 10, 1998, event forecast
products made no mention of winds exceeding 65 mph, yet there were dozens of separate instances of
winds exceeding 80 mph throughout the region. Even the lower‐impact, October 2010 event had dozens
of gusts exceeding the maximum thresholds named in forecast products. The forecasting challenges arise
from a combination of low event frequency, low priority (when compared with other hazards), and limited
understanding of the latest research.
Recently, mechanisms contributing to cyclone‐related, non‐convective extreme winds have become
better understood. Events with extreme winds share the following commonalities:
Intense cyclone. The strongest 5% of cyclones in the Upper Midwest have minimum sea‐level
pressure of 980 millibars or lower and produce strong regional winds. Both the likelihood and
coverage of high and extreme winds increase as the minimum pressure drops, with 972 millibars
serving as a threshold below which both are almost guaranteed.
The first indicator that extreme winds are possible is the forecast of a sub‐980 millibar
cyclone within the region. The lower the forecast minimum pressure, the greater the
potential for impacts. Potential can be ascertained several days in advance.
Cyclone passes north or northwest of area. Although non‐convective strong and high winds can
be distributed widely throughout the cool side of any intense cyclone, the most extreme winds
tend to be found to the south of the center of low pressure, especially in cyclones whose
minimum pressure is below 972 millibars. This is most likely within 300 miles of the cyclone, but
distances vary depending on the circulation structure. For example, the October 1949 event had
its maximum impact area 150‐300 miles southeast of the low, versus 25‐150 miles to the south
of the low in the November 1998 event.
The second indicator that extreme winds are possible is if the sub‐980 millibar cyclone is
forecast to pass northwest or north of the area. The nearer the cyclone (to the
north/northwest), the greater the potential for impacts, especially if the minimum
pressure is forecast below 972millibars. Potential can be ascertained 1‐3 days in advance.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
200
Presence of a “sting jet” or “mesoscale dry hook.” The most intense non‐convective winds tend
to form in the cool air circulation
that wraps around and to the south
of the cyclone, in association with
one of two features. The first is the
“sting jet,” which is associated with
the pointed end of the comma‐
shaped cloud formation that wraps
around the low. It is so named
because of its resemblance to a
scorpion tail. Another feature is the
“mesoscale dry hook,” which is a
sharp, reverse‐J‐shaped feature that
forms in the tightly rotating comma
head, which is found, incidentally,
north, and west of the sting jet. The
strongest winds are often found near
the base of the hook. The two
features often move closer to each
other as a cyclone reaches maximum
intensity. Both are associated with
descending or drying air, often
originating in the strong winds in the
mid‐troposphere or above. If the
descending air makes it to the ground,
extraordinarily strong surface winds
can result. The science is not
sufficiently evolved to determine
exactly which events were sting jets,
mesoscale dry hooks, or both.
However, either one is an excellent
indicator of extreme wind potential
when a surface cyclone is of sufficient
intensity (indicator 1 above). It should
be noted that these features may
form in the absence of a strong
cyclone, but their airflows will remain aloft and therefore will not pose serious threats.
The third indicator that extreme winds are possible is the formation of a sting jet or a
mesoscale dry hook (or both), which can be detected on satellite products.
TABLES 4.3.12A and 4.3.12B can be used as guides for anticipating non‐convective wind impacts, based
on pressure ranges, distance from the cyclone, and location relative to the cyclone.
Mesoscale dry hook with November 10, 1998, cyclone. Source:
Iacopelli and Knox 2001.
Sting jet (A), in association with strong system on Mar 12,
2012. Courtesy University of Wisconsin CIMSS.
A
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
201
TABLE 4.3.12A
High Winds
Nearest distance to cyclone center
> 500 mi 300‐500 mi < 300 mi
Lo
w
e
s
t
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e
(m
b
)
>980 Isolated Isolated Isolated Low Low Low
972‐980 Low Low Low Mod Mod Mod
<972 Low Low Mod Mod Hi Hi
No Yes No Yes No Yes
Does cyclone pass northwest or north of area?
TABLE 4.3.12B
Extreme Winds
Nearest distance to cyclone center
> 500 mi 300‐500 mi < 300 mi
Lo
w
e
s
t
Pr
e
s
s
u
r
e
(m
b
)
>980 Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Isolated Isolated Low
972‐980 Isolated Isolated Low Low Low Mod
<972 Isolated Isolated Low Mod Mod Hi
No Yes No Yes No Yes
Does cyclone pass northwest or north of area?
4.3.12.10. Critical Values & Thresholds
Because duration is such an important component of the wind loadings and total impacts, no firm
thresholds have been determined for non‐convective wind speeds. However, research has shown that
some impacts emerge when gusts exceed 60 mph. When gusts exceed 75mph, impacts are often
widespread, and casualties tend to increase dramatically.
4.3.12.11. Preparedness
If planning to be outdoors for a significant length of time, be aware of the weather forecast, especially if
you will be well‐removed from sturdy shelter. Stay "connected" via television, radio, NOAA Weather
Radio, or social media. Non‐convective high wind events rarely occur without warning, although warning
lead times may be comparatively limited during the evolution of an extreme wind episode. Because
protracted and extensive electrical and communication disruptions may occur, set aside emergency water
and food supplies, can openers, batteries, and flashlights.
Likelihood and coverage of high wind impacts, given cyclone intensity, distance, and location.
Likelihood and coverage of extreme wind impacts, given cyclone intensity, distance, and location.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
202
4.3.12.12. Mitigation
Education and Awareness Programs
● Field construction crews, public works employees, and those who work or spend
significant time outdoors should be educated about these risks.
● Members of the public should understand the risks posed by non‐convective wind events.
● Educating homeowners on the benefits of wind retrofits such as shutters and hurricane
clips.
● Ensuring that school officials are aware of the best area of refuge in school buildings.
● Educating design professionals to include wind mitigation during building design.
Structural Mitigation Projects – Public Buildings & Critical Facilities
● Anchoring roof‐mounted heating, ventilation, and air conditioner units
● Purchase backup generators
● Upgrading and maintaining existing lightning protection systems to prevent roof cover
damage.
● Converting traffic lights to mast arms.
Structural Mitigation Projects – Residential
● Reinforcing garage doors
● Inspecting and retrofitting roofs to adequate standards to provide wind resistance.
● Retrofitting with load‐path connectors to strengthen the structural frames.
.
4.3.12.13. Recovery
Recovery from non‐convective high winds can take weeks and may be complicated by a combination of
cold weather, power outages, fallen trees, ice, or snow. In forested areas, logging activities may be
significantly impacted, and fuel loads may exacerbate the potential for wildland fire. In addition to power
outages, persistent wind loading on structures has at times caused gas line ruptures.
4.3.12.14. References
Ashley, W. S., & Black, A. W. (2008). Fatalities associated with nonconvective high‐wind events in the
United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 47(2), 717‐725.
Iacopelli, A. J., & Knox, J. A. (2001). Mesoscale dynamics of the record‐breaking 10 November 1998 mid‐
latitude cyclone: A satellite‐based case study.National Weather Digest, 25(1/2), 33‐42.
Knox, J. A., Frye, J. D., Durkee, J. D., & Fuhrmann, C. M. (2011). Non‐Convective High Winds Associated
with Extratropical Cyclones. Geography Compass, 5(2), 63‐89.
Knox, J. A., & Lacke, M. C. (2011). Death from a clear blue sky: extreme nonconvective high winds.
Earthzine.org (http://earthzine.org/2011/06/04/death‐from‐a‐clear‐blue‐sky‐extreme‐non‐
convective‐high‐winds/)
Lacke, M. C., Knox, J. A., Frye, J. D., Stewart, A. E., Durkee, J. D., Fuhrmann, C. M., & Dillingham, S. M.
(2007). A climatology of cold‐season nonconvective wind events in the Great Lakes region. Journal
of Climate, 20(24), 6012‐6022.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
203
Minnesota State Climatology Office, Minnesota DNR, (2021). Mid‐December Tornadoes, Derecho, and
Damaging Cold Front‐‐December 15‐16, 2021. https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/mid‐
december‐tornadoes‐derecho‐and‐damaging‐cold‐front‐december‐15‐16‐2021.html
Minnesota State Climatology Office, Minnesota DNR, (2015). Anniversary of October 10, 1949
Windstorm. https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/491010_windstorm_anniversary.html
NOAA, National Climatic Data Center (1998). Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena November
1998, V 40 no 11.
NOAA, National Climatic Data Center (2010). Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena October
2010, V 52 no 10.
National Weather Service, Marquette MI. Storm Warning: Advancements in Marine Forecasting since
the Edmund Fitzgerald, http://www.weather.gov/mqt/fitz_gales
National Weather Service, La Crosse WI. Armistice Day Storm ‐ November 11, 1940,
http://www.weather.gov/arx/nov111940
National Weather Service, Duluth MN. The North American Extratropical Cyclone of October 26‐27,
2010. http://www.weather.gov/dlh/101026_extratropicallow
Vose, R. S., Applequist, S., Bourassa, M. A., Pryor, S. C., Barthelmie, R. J., Blanton, B., ... & Young, R. S.
(2014). Monitoring and understanding changes in extremes: Extratropical storms, winds, and
waves. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 95(3), 377‐386.
Williams, D.T (1949). A brief meteorological summary of the October 10, 1949, Windstorm at
Minneapolis, MN. Minnesota State Climatology Office event archives.
.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
204
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
205
4.3.13. Hazard Assessment: ICE STORMS
4.3.13.1. Definition
Ice storms are major winter weather events that produce
accumulations of ice, either from rain falling in sub‐freezing
surface temperatures, or from heavy sleet.
In Minnesota and Hennepin County, ice storms form most
commonly ahead of a warm front, resulting in warm air being
lifted over colder air in place, producing precipitation that is
warm enough for rain but then freezes on contact with sub‐
freezing objects. When the front is associated with strong low
pressure, the precipitation can be quite heavy, with rapid ice
accumulations. With weaker systems or when the front is
stationary, it may produce sustained light to moderate
precipitation for many hours. Either situation can lead to ice‐related impacts.
If the layer of freezing air near the surface is deep enough, the precipitation will fall as sleet instead of
freezing rain. The granular nature of sleet generally makes it less of a damage and safety hazard than
freezing rain, but sleet is nevertheless often a part of major ice storms.
4.3.13.2. Range of magnitude
Magnitude of ice accumulation is rarely measured, and most accounts are purely anecdotal. Severe ice
storms in Minnesota have been reported to leave a glaze up to 3 inches thick.
4.3.13.3. Spectrum of consequences B2b
Heavy accumulations of ice can bring down trees, topple utility poles, and damage communications
towers, disrupting power and communications for days, while utility companies make extensive repairs.
Ice also damages roofs, gutters, and downspouts, and falling tree limbs often cause devastating secondary
damages to structures and vehicles.
Even small ice accumulations can be extremely dangerous for motorists and pedestrians, and ice storms
often result in increased accidents, falls, and injuries. The following categories represent the most
common and severe consequences for ice storms:
Significant ice storm damage in southwestern
Minnesota in April 2013. Courtesy MPR.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
206
Outdoor life safety hazards
If associated with a severe winter
weather system, heavy snow, strong
winds, falling temperatures and
dangerous wind chills may follow the
ice storm. Persons caught outside
unprepared can face disorientation,
frostbite, hypothermia, and death.
25% of winter storm casualties occur
among those caught outside in the
storm.
Power/utilities
Ice storms can cause power outages
from direct loading on electrical wires,
and more commonly from indirect
sources, for example when tree limbs
become overloaded with ice and fall
onto wires. Ice accumulations greater
than a quarter inch can cause
widespread power outages, and strong winds exacerbate this impact. The duration of service outages
is typically related to the complexity of the outage pattern, along with the ability of crews to get to
repair sites. Thus, prolonged ice storms with strong winds are associated with higher outage numbers
and longer service delays.
Structural damage
Ice storms can damage roofs at residences, and at larger commercial facilities as well. Large roof spans
lacking consistent support are especially vulnerable. Secondary damage from falling ice‐coated tree
limbs is especially common. These falling limbs are often significantly heavier because of the ice and
can break windows and damage downspouts and gutters. In if the rain is especially heavy, ice can
penetrate vulnerable locations in roofs, deforming them and often leading to significant water damage
to plaster and drywall materials inside the structure.
Transportation
Ice storms are especially dangerous to the transportation. Major ice storms can paralyze the entire
transportation system, including public transportation and airports. Spinouts and accidents frequently
number in the hundreds. However, most large ice storms are anticipated, and road treatments are
possible ahead of time. Smaller events from freezing drizzle only cause minor ice accumulations, but
when unforeseen, can be devastating. A thin glaze from freezing drizzle on November 20‐21, 2010,
resulted in several hundred reported accidents, and at least two fatalities.
4.3.13.4. Potential for cascading effects
Extended power outages
An ice storm that knocks out power becomes much more dangerous as the time to restore service
increases. This is especially true of storms that are followed by a rapid drop in temperatures. Residences
and facilities dependent on electrical power for heat distribution can become dangerously cold within
hours of power loss.
Temperature profiles associated with freezing rain. Source: Midwest
Regional Climate Center.
http://mrcc.isws.illinois.edu/living_wx/icestorms/
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
207
Moreover, it is not uncommon for a major ice storm to be followed by or transition to a heavy snowfall
event or blizzard. In these cases, the ice produces the initial critical loading, but then the snow and/or
wind acts as the “final straw,” resulting in severe and widespread power outages. In these situations, the
snowstorm or blizzard is just another link in a chain of cascading hazards already in progress.
Flooding
Depending on hydrological and meteorological conditions, ice storms may prime areas for both flash‐
flooding, and river flooding. Flash‐flood scenarios unfold when the glaze of ice is especially thick,
temperatures rise to slightly above freezing, and a period of heavy thunderstorms or heavy rain occurs
before the ice can melt. Because of ice restricting flow into storm sewers, falling rain can lead to rapid
ponding on roads and low‐lying areas. If the storm water infrastructure is not obstructed, a heavy glaze on
the land will prevent absorption by soils, and will direct falling rain directly into area streams, which may
rise rapidly. It should be noted that these scenarios to date are extremely rare, and reports in Minnesota
have been highly localized.
River flooding can occur after a major ice storm if a large snowpack had been present and/or additional
rain falls over a large area. The melted snow would be the initial cause of rising river levels, which would
then be exacerbated by rain falling over ice, and to a lesser extent by the melting ice itself. Like flash‐
flooding, these situations are not common and would require a convergence of many factors. The main
risks would occur during the late winter snowmelt period.
Severe weather
In rare situations, it is possible for ice storms to follow or be followed by a significant severe weather event.
November, March, and April are currently the most likely months. Power outages and compromised
communications from ice storms may limit situational awareness needed to heed severe weather
warnings. A direct hit by a major severe weather event on an area recently affected by an ice storm would
further complicate damages and compound clean‐up efforts. Similarly, an ice storm following a damaging
severe weather event would threaten to worsen the impacts significantly, with additional tree, power,
structural, and interior damage possible.
4.3.13.5. Geographic scope of hazard B1c
Most major ice storms in Minnesota affect thousands to tens of thousands of square miles‐‐generally an
area the size of 10‐20 southern Minnesota counties. There have been larger events, and ice storms in the
central and southern US often cover 50‐100 thousand square miles at a time, with total footprint of up to
250 thousand square miles in some cases.
The State Climatology Office has noted that historically, ice storms have tended to favor higher terrain
locations just inland from the north shore of Lake Superior, and along the Buffalo Ridge in southwestern
Minnesota. While ice storms have affected every part of Minnesota, these areas have elevated
frequencies.
4.3.13.6. Chronologic patterns (seasons, cycles, rhythm)
GRAPHIC 4.3.13A shows the peak months, historically, for ice storms in Minnesota are January and April,
but the main season should be considered November through April. Rare ice storms have occurred in
Minnesota in October and May.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
208
GRAPHIC 4.3.13A
4.3.13.7. Historical (statistical) data/previous occurrence B1d
Most parts of Minnesota
average between 3 to 5 days
of exposure per season.
Approximately 6 to 9 hours
of that time includes
freezing rain. It should be
noted that freezing rain and
drizzle can occur while
transitioning between rain
and snow weather patterns.
The frequency of true ice
storms, however, is much
lower. Thirty ice storms
affected Minnesota in the 20
winter seasons between
1995‐96 and 2014‐15,
yielding an approximate
frequency of 1.5 per year.
However, ice storms can be highly episodic and clustered in time, with no ice storms in five of those years
(25%), and six events during the 1996‐97 winter alone.
The following noteworthy ice storms affected various parts of Minnesota:
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
209
Feb. 22, 1922.
Blizzard, ice and thunderstorms across Minnesota, with winds hitting 50 mph in Duluth while
thunderstorms were reported in the Twin Cities. Heavy ice over southeast Minnesota with 2 inches
of ice on wires near Winona. Over two inches of precipitation fell in many areas. This was also one
of the largest ice storms in Wisconsin history with ice four inches in diameter on telegraph wires.
One foot of ice‐covered wire weighed 11 pounds.
Jan. 9‐10, 1934.
Sleet and ice storm over southwest Minnesota. Hardest hit was Slayton, Tracy, and Pipestone. The
thickest ice was just east of Pipestone with ice measuring 6 to 8 inches in diameter. At Holland in
Pipestone County 3 strands of #6 wire measured 4 ½ inches in diameter and weighed 33 ounces
per foot. The ice was described as: “very peculiar in formation being practically round on three
sides, the lower side being ragged projectiles like icicles: in other words, pointed. The frost and ice
were wet, not flaky like frost usually is. In handling this, it could be squeezed into a ball and did
not crumble.”
March 3‐5, 1935.
Called “the worst ice storm in Duluth’s history,” the area covered by this storm was centered on
Duluth and extended up the Lake Superior coast to Beaver Bay, and east to Ashland, WI. The worst
of the storm extended about 40 miles to the west and south of Duluth. The storm began in the
evening of March 3, with rain and wet snow falling at the Duluth Weather Bureau, and a
temperature of 26 degrees. By morning the snow stopped but the rain continued. Ice had
accumulated to ⅜ inches by 11 AM and ⅞ inches at 4PM, at which point the lights started going
out. By the morning of the 5th, ice coatings were measured at 1.5 inches and Duluth was virtually
cut off from the outside world, except for short wave radio. A local ham radio operator sent the
Duluth Weather Bureau reports. Four streetcars had to be abandoned in the storm, three of them
in the western part of the city. A heavy salt mixture and pick axes were used to try to free the stuck
streetcars. A one‐mile stretch of telephone poles along Thompson’s Hill was “broken off as if they
were toothpicks” due to the ice. A Duluth, Masabi & Northern Railway engineer estimated up to
7 inches of ice on cables in Proctor. 75% of shade trees were reported ruined in Moose Lake, with
thousands of trees stripped of their limbs. Hibbing also had damage due to ice with the breaking
of large and small branches. The Portal Telephone Company in the city of Superior, Wisconsin
noted ice from ½ to 1 ½ inches in diameter.
Nov. 10‐11, 1940
(Armistice Day Storm). This destructive storm also produced up to ½ inch of ice on wires with ice
thickness to 1 inch in Pine City and Lake Benton. Combined with fierce winds, damage to power
poles was widespread. In correspondence with M.R. Hovde, the meteorologist in charge of the US
Weather Bureau Office, Northwestern Bell reported:
Northwestern Bell and Tri ‐State Telephone & telegraph Company Repairs and
Replacements. $79,000 total estimated cost.
Thickness of ice on wires‐ Generally 1/8‐to‐1/2‐inch diameter. 1 inch in diameter in two
small areas.
Time ice first began to form‐ Early morning of November 11, 1940
Length of time ice remained on wires‐ About 24 hours.
Locality of heaviest ice formation‐ 1‐inch diameter in small area near Pine City. 1‐inch
diameter in vicinity of Lake Benton.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
210
Approximate number of wires down ‐1600
Approximate number of poles down ‐2400
Extent of delay of service‐ Average 18 hours for toll and 36 hours for exchange lines out
of service.
Remarks: The above covers damage to both Northwestern Bell and Tri ‐State Telephone
Company plant in Minnesota. The greatest damage was in the area about 20 miles east
and west of a line from Sandstone to Albert Lea.
Jan. 14, 1952.
Glaze, sleet and ice storm across Minnesota from St Cloud south into Iowa. 1,100 Northwestern
Bell telephone wires down. The Buffalo Ridge in the Pipestone area the hardest hit with ¾ inches
of solid ice on Northern State Power wires with icicles to 3 inches. Northwestern Bell reported ice
to 1 ½ inches of ice on their wires in the same area. Thunder and a shower of ice pellets
accompanied the storm in New Ulm and Mankato. Minneapolis General Hospital treated 81
victims of falls on icy streets.
North Shore Ice Storm, March 23‐24, 2009.
A vigorous area of low pressure moved out of western Nebraska on March 22, and an area of
moderate rain reached northeast Minnesota after midnight on March 23rd. The surface air was
warm enough in places like Ely and Hibbing for only minor ice accumulations. However, along the
north shore of Lake Superior, near‐surface air temperatures remained below freezing. Moderate
rain continued through the day and tapered off by the early morning hours of March 24th. Two ‐
day precipitation totals include .91 inches at Grand Marais and 1.94 inches at Duluth. The .91
inches at Grand Marais was freezing rain.
Power outages began as tree
branches snapped and downed
power lines. Some of the places
hardest hit were Two Harbors,
Finland, and Grand Marais.
2,000 people were without
power in Lake County. The
crashing sounds of tree
branches could be heard in the
woods at Wolf Ridge
Environmental Learning Center.
November 20‐21, 2010.
A dangerous weather situation
set up late on Saturday
November 20th and into early
Sunday morning the 21st, as
freezing drizzle and light
freezing rain spread northward.
Although ice accumulations were very light, the glaze caused treacherous driving conditions,
resulting in over 400 accidents and two deaths in Minnesota.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
211
Southwest Minnesota Ice
Storm, April 9‐11, 2013.
A slow‐moving low‐pressure
system pumped copious
amounts of moisture up into a
subfreezing air mass, resulting
in up to 48 hours of nearly
continuous freezing rain in
southwestern Minnesota,
eastern Nebraska,
northwestern Iowa, and
eastern South Dakota. Just
north of the freezing rain,
heavy, wet snow accumulated
6‐14 inches. In southwestern
Minnesota, hundreds of trees
and power poles were snapped
by the ice, which accumulated
to nearly 1” thick near Worthington. Extensive secondary damage occurred to residences and
vehicles, as tree limbs snapped off and crashed through windows. Power outages lasted days in
some areas. Governor Dayton issued Executive Order 13‐03, to authorize state assistance for
recovery efforts in southwestern Minnesota.
There have been no other incidents that are within the scope of this plan.
4.3.13.8. Future trends/likelihood of occurrence B1e
Little is known about future trends with respect to ice storm activity. On one hand, damaging ice storm
frequency may decrease, as more and more winter events fall as above‐freezing liquid. Another argument
is that more events that would have been snowstorms will contain freezing rain, and hence, more ice
storms. Yet another line of reasoning suggests that increased wintertime moisture will result in more heavy
precipitation events, including heavy rain and freezing rain. The topic has received little research attention,
so there is virtually no “consensus” about what is likely to happen.
4.2.13.9. Indications and Forecasting
The Twin Cities/Chanhassen forecast office of the National Weather Service is the official forecasting
authority for major winter weather events affecting Hennepin County, including ice storms. High‐intensity
winter storms are usually well anticipated by the numerical weather prediction models, often up to a week
in advance, and forecasters tend to have high awareness of potentially dangerous winter conditions two
days or more before they develop. The potential for significant ice accumulation 1‐3 days out is also
monitored by the Weather Prediction Center, at NOAA/NWS headquarters.
4.3.13.10. Detection & Warning
Warning authority for ice storms also lies with the Twin Cities/Chanhassen forecast office of the National
Weather Service. An urgently severe ice storm will be covered by an Ice Storm Warning, which indicates
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
212
over a quarter inch of ice accumulation is expected. These situations may lead to damage and power
outages, in addition to dangerous or impossible travel.
If a severe ice storm is expected with other winter hazards, especially snow, the NWS may cover all hazards
under a Winter Storm Warning. Similarly, lesser ice accumulations with lighter accumulating snow may be
covered under a Winter Weather Advisory.
4.3.13.11. Critical values and thresholds
Ice storm or Winter Storm Warnings will be issued when over ¼ inch of ice accumulation is expected.
Damage to trees, along with power outages, increase dramatically after ½” of ice accumulation.
4.3.13.12. Preparedness
Because ice storms are likely to disrupt power and disable local transportation routes, before the storm
strikes, homes, offices, and vehicles should be stocked with needed supplies. At home or work, primary
concerns are loss of heat, power and telephone service, and a shortage of supplies in prolonged or
especially severe and disruptive events.
Essential Supplies
● Flashlight and extra batteries
● Battery‐powered NOAA Weather Radio and portable radio to receive emergency information.
● Extra food and water such as dried fruit, nuts and granola bars, and other food requiring no
cooking or refrigeration.
● Extra prescription medicine
● Baby items such as diapers and formula
● First‐aid supplies
● Heating fuel
● Emergency heat source: properly ventilated fireplace, wood stove, or space heater
● Fire extinguisher, smoke alarm; test smoke alarms once a month to ensure they work properly.
● Extra pet food and warm shelter for pets
● Back‐up generator (optional) but never run a generator in an enclosed space.
● Carbon monoxide detector
● Outside vents should be clear of leaves, and debris, and cleared of snow after the storm.
4.3.13.13. Mitigation
Education and Awareness Programs
● Vehicle fleet crews and others who spend substantial time on the road should be familiar with
NWS warning products, jurisdictions, and be familiar with how to obtain pertinent information.
All professional drivers should carry winter weather survival supplies.
● Members of the general public should understand the risks posed by winter storms, and should
review the information available at https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/hsem/weather‐awareness‐
preparedness/Pages/winter‐storms.aspx.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
213
4.3.13.14. Recovery
Recovery from a major ice storm can take days, or even weeks if it is complicated by a combination of
other weather hazards. In forested areas, logging activities may be significantly impacted, and fuel loads
from fallen trees may exacerbate the potential for wildland fire. In addition to power outages, persistent
wind loading on structures, associated with powerful winter storms, has at times caused gas line ruptures.
4.3.13.15. References
Changnon, S. A., & Karl, T. R. (2003, 09). Temporal and Spatial Variations of Freezing Rain in the
Contiguous United States: 1948–2000. Journal of Applied Meteorology J. Appl. Meteor., 42(9),
1302‐1315. doi:10.1175/1520‐0450(2003)0422.0.co;2
Homeland Security and Emergency Management. (n.d.). Retrieved April 11, 2016, from
https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/hsem/weather‐awareness‐preparedness/Pages/winter‐storms.aspx
Ice Storm ‐ Southwest Minnesota: April 9‐10, 2013. (n.d.). Retrieved April 11, 2016, from
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/journal/130410_winter_storm.html
Ice Storms. (n.d.). Retrieved April 11, 2016, from http://mrcc.isws.illinois.edu/living_wx/icestorms/
North Shore Ice Storm: March 23‐24, 2009. (n.d.). Retrieved April 11, 2016, from
http://climate.umn.edu/doc/journal/Ice_storm090323_24.htm
Overview of Extensive Ice Storms in Minnesota, retrieved from
http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/natural_resources/climate/summaries_and_publications/ice_storms
_in_minnesota.pdf
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
214
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
215
SECTION 5 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
After hazards were identified, they were given a ranking of “high”, “medium” or “low”. This was based
on their probability of occurrence, their impact on population, critical infrastructure, and the economy.
Each participating municipality may have differing degrees of risk exposure and vulnerability compared to
others due their geographic proximity to the hazard. However, many of the hazards are countywide risks
due to their size and their impacts, and because not all are geographically specific. Under each map
portion is a hazard ranking justification statement of why the hazard was given the ranking it received.
5.1 Hazard Ranking Maps B1b
The following pages provide hazard rankings (in alphabetical order) for the following hazards:
GRAPHIC 5.1A Blizzard 212
GRAPHIC 5.1B Climate Change 213
GRAPHIC 5.1C Drought 214
GRAPHIC 5.1D Dust Storms 215
GRAPHIC 5.1E Extreme, Cold 216
GRAPHIC 5.1F Extreme, Heat 217
GRAPHIC 5.1G Extreme, Rainfall 218
GRAPHIC 5.1H Flooding, River 219
GRAPHIC 5.1I Flooding, Urban 220
GRAPHIC 5.1J Hail 221
GRAPHIC 5.1K Ice Storm 222
GRAPHIC 5.1L Lightning 223
GRAPHIC 5.1M Tornado 224
GRAPHIC 5.1N Winds, Non‐Convective 225
GRAPHIC 5.1O Winds, Straight‐Line 226
GRAPHIC 5.1P Winter Storm 227
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
216
GRAPHIC 5.1A Blizzard
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
217
GRAPHIC 5.1B Climate Change
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
218
GRAPHIC 5.1C Drought
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
219
GRAPHIC 5.1D Dust Storms
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
220
GRAPHIC 5.1E Extreme Cold
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
221
GRAPHIC 5.1F Extreme Heat
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
222
GRAPHIC 5.1G Extreme Rainfall
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
223
GRAPHIC 5.1H Flooding, River
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
224
GRAPHIC 5.1I Flooding, Urban
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
225
GRAPHIC 5.1J Hail
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
226
GRAPHIC 5.1K Ice Storm
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
227
GRAPHIC 5.1L Lightning
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
228
GRAPHIC 5.1M Tornado
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
229
GRAPHIC 5.1N Winds Non‐Convective
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
230
GRAPHIC 5.1O Winds, Straight‐Line
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
231
GRAPHIC 5.1P Winter Storm
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
232
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
233
6.1. Inventories
The effects of a disaster can be wide‐ranging from human casualty to property damage to the disruption
of governmental, social, and economic activity. Often not considered, is the potential devastating effects
of disasters on historic properties and cultural resources. Historic buildings and structures, artwork,
monuments, family heirlooms, and historic documents are often irreplaceable, and may be lost forever in
a disaster if not considered in the mitigation planning process. The loss of these resources is more painful
and ironic considering how often residents rely on their presence after a disaster to reinforce connections
with neighbors and the larger community, and to seek comfort in the aftermath of a disaster.
To inventory the county’s cultural resources, the Steering Committee collected information from the
following sources:
National Register of Historic Places
Minnesota’s National Historic Landmarks
6.2. National Register of Historic Places ‐ Hennepin County
It should be noted that these lists may not be complete, as they may not include those currently in the
nomination process and note yet listed. TABLE 9.2A provides registered historical sites, please go to the
National Register of Historic Places website for additional information.
TABLE 6.2A Registered Historical Sites
National Register of Historic Places – Hennepin County
Advanced Thresher /Emerson – Newton
Implement Company
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Ames‐Florida House
City: Rockford
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1856
Anoka‐Champlin Mississippi River Bridge
City: Champlin
Historic Significance: Commerce/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Architects and Engineers Building
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Commerce/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Atwater, Isaac, House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899,
1850‐1874
Baird, George W., House
City: Edina
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Bardwell‐Ferrant House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Barry, Margaret, Settlement House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Education/Social History
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Bartholomew, Riley Lucas, House
City: Richfield
Basilica of St. Mary Catholic
City: Minneapolis
SECTION 6 Cultural Resources Inventory
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
234
National Register of Historic Places – Hennepin County
Historic Significance: Person
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899, 1850‐1874
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Bennett‐McBride House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Bovey, Charles Cranston & Kate Koon, House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Bremer, Frederika, Intermediate School
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Burwell, Charles H., House
City: Minnetonka
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899, 1850‐1874
Butler Brothers Company
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Cahill School
City: Edina
Historic Significance: Person
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924,
1875‐1899, 1850‐1874
Calhoun Beach Club
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Cappelen Memorial Bridge
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Carpenter, Elbert L., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Carpenter, Eugene J., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Cedar Avenue Bridge
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Chadwick, Loren L., Cottages
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Chamber of Commerce
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Chamber of Commerce Building
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad Grade
Separation
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Depot
City: Saint Louis Park
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924,
1875‐1899
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Depot,
Freight House & Train Shed
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Christ Church Lutheran
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Church of St. Stephen (Catholic)
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Coe, Amos B., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
235
National Register of Historic Places – Hennepin County
Como‐Harriet Streetcar Line & Trolley
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924,
1875‐1899
Country Club Historic District
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Crane Island Historic District
City: Minnestrista
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Cummins, John R., Farmhouse
City: Eden Prairie
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Cutter, B.O., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1850‐1874
Dania Hall
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
East Lake Branch Library
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Edina Mills
City: Edina
Historic Significance: NA
Period of Significance: NA
Eitel Hospital
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event, Person
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Excelsior Fruit Growers Association Building
City: Excelsior
Historic Significance: Agriculture, Commerce
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Excelsior Public School
City: Excelsior
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1950‐1974, 1925, 1949
Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Fire Station No. 19
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
First Church of Christ Scientist
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
First Congregational Church
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
First National Bank – Soo Line Building
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1950‐1974, 1925‐1949,
1900‐1924
Fisk, Woodbury, House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1850‐1874
Flour Exchange Building
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Fort Snelling
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899,
1850‐1874, 1825‐1849, 1800‐1824
Fort Snelling – Mendota Bridge
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Forum Cafeteria
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
236
National Register of Historic Places – Hennepin County
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949 Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Foshay Tower
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Fournier, Lawrence A. & Mary, House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Fowler Methodist Episcopal Church
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Social History
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Franklin Branch Library
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event/Person
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Gethsemane Episcopal Church
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Gideon, Peter, Farmhouse
City: Shorewood
Historic Significance: Person
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899, 1850‐1874
Glen Lake Children’s Camp
City: Eden Prairie
Historic Significance: Health/Medicine
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Gluek, John G, & Minnie, House & Carriage
House
City: Shorewood
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Grace Evangelical Lutheran Church
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Great Northern Implement Company
City: Wayzata
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1950, 1900‐1924
Grimes, Jonathan Taylor, house
City: Edina
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899, 1850‐1874
Hagel Family Farm
City: Rogers
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1950‐1974, 1925‐1949,
1900‐1924, 1875‐1899, 1850, 1874
Handicraft Guild Building
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Hanover Bridge
City: Rogers
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Healy Block Residential Historic District
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Hennepin County Library
City: Robbinsdale
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Hennepin Theater
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Hewitt, Edwin, H., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Hinkle‐Murphy House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Holmes, Henry E., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Intercity Bridge
City: Minneapolis
Interlachen Bridge (Ford Bridge)
City: Minneapolis
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
237
National Register of Historic Places – Hennepin County
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Interlachen Bridge (Cottage City Bridge)
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Jones, Harry W., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐2949, 1900‐1924,
1875‐1899
Lakewood Cemetery Memorial Chapel
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Legg, Harry F., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Linden Hills Branch Library
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event/Person
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Little Sister of the Poor Home for Aged
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Lock and Dam No. 2
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Lohmar, John, House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Lumber Exchange Building
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Madison School
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: NA
Period of Significance: NA
Martin, Charles J., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Masonic Temple
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Maternity Hospital
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Person
Period of Significance: 190‐1924
Milwaukee Ave Historic District
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Minneapolis Armory
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Minneapolis Brewing Company
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924,
1875‐1899
Minneapolis City Hall‐Hennepin County
Courthouse
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Minneapolis Fire Department Repair Shop
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Minneapolis Pioneers & Soldiers Memorial
Cemetery
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Minneapolis Public Library, North Branch
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
238
National Register of Historic Places – Hennepin County
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Minneapolis Warehouse Historic District
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924,
1875‐1899, 1850‐1874
Minneapolis YMCA Central Building
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Minnehaha Grange Hall
City: Edina
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899. 1850‐1874
Minnehaha Historic District
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899,
1850‐1874, 1825‐1849
Minnesota Soldiers’ Home Historic District
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 192‐1949, 1900‐1924.
1875‐1899
Minnetonka Town Hall
City: Minnetonka
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Company
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Morse Jr., Elisha & Lizzie, House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1850‐1874
Neils, Frieda & Henry J., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1950‐1974
New Century Mill (Boundary Increase)
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
New Century Mill (Boundary Decrease)
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
New Century Mill (Boundary Increase)
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
New Main – Augsburg Seminary
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Newell, George R., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Nicollet Hotel
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Nokomis Knoll Residential Historic District
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
North East Neighborhood House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1950‐1974, 1925‐1949,
1900‐1924
Northwestern Bell Telephone Company Building
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Northwestern Knitting Company Factory
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Ogden Apartment Hotel
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Old Log Theater Owre, Dr. Oscar, house
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
239
National Register of Historic Places – Hennepin County
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Parker, Charles & Grace, House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Peavey‐Haglin experimental Concrete Grain
Elevator
City: Saint Louis Park
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Pence Automobile Company Building
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event/Person
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Phi Gamma Delta Fraternity House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Pillsbury A Mill
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Pioneer Steel Elevator
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Pond, Gideon H., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Prescott House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Person
Period of Significance: 1850‐1874
Prospect Park Water Tower & Tower Hill Park
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Purcell, William Gray, House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Queene Avenue Bridge
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Rand Tower
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Roosevelt Branch Library
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Person
Period of Significance: 1924‐1949
Sanford, Maria, House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Person
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Sears, Roebuck & Company Mail‐Order
Warehouse & Retail Store
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1950‐1974, 1925‐1949
Second Church of Christ, Scientist,
Administration Building
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Semple, Anne C & Brank B., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Shubert, Same S., Theater
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Smith, H. Alden, House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Smith, Leno O., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Person
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
240
National Register of Historic Places – Hennepin County
South Ninth Street Historic District
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: NA
Period of Significance: NA
St. Anthony Falls Historic District
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924,
1875‐1899, 1850‐1874, 1825‐1849
State Theater
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Station 13 Minneapolis Fire Department
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
Station 28 Minneapolis Fire Department
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Stevens Square Historic District
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Stewart Memorial Presbyterian Church
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1925
Summer Branch Library
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Person/Event
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Swinford Townhouses & Apartments
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Thirty‐Sixth Street Branch Library
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event/Person
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Thompson Summer House
City: Minnetonka Beach
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924,
1875‐1899
Turnblad, Sawn, House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Twin City Rapid Transit Company Steam Power
Plant
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
United States Post Office
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924
University of Minnesota Old Campus Historic
District
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Van Cleve, Horatio P., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899, 1850‐1874
Van Dusen, George W & Nancy B., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Walker Branch Library
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event/Person
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924
Washburn A Mill Complex
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Washburn Park Water Tower
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Washburn – Fair Oaks Mansion District
City: Minneapolis
Wesley Methodist Episcopal Church
City: Minneapolis
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
241
National Register of Historic Places – Hennepin County
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1900‐1924, 1875‐1899
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
Westminster Presbyterian Church
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Event
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1924,
1875‐1899
White Castle Building No. 8
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Wiley, Malcolm., House
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949
Wirth, Theodore, House – Administration
Building
City: Minneapolis
Historic Significance: Person
Period of Significance: 1925‐1949, 1900‐1925
Wyer, Allemarinda & James, House
City: Excelsior
Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Period of Significance: 1875‐1899
6.3. Hennepin County Historic Landmark Maps
National Historic Landmarks (NHLs) are historic places that possess exceptional value in commemorating
or illustrating the history of the United States. The National Park Service’s National Historic Landmarks
Program oversees the designation of such sites. The following Hennepin County sites were designated by
the United States Secretary of the Interior because they met one of the criteria below
Sites where events of national historic significance occurred.
Places where prominent persons lived or worked.
Icons of ideas that shaped the nation.
Outstanding examples of design or construction.
Places characterizing a way of life or.
Archeological sites able to yield information.
TABLE 6.3A Minnesota’s National Historic Landmarks‐ Hennepin County
Minnesota’s National Historic Landmarks – Hennepin County
Landmark Year
Christ Church Lutheran, Minneapolis 1/16/09
Fort Snelling, 12/19/60
Peavey‐Haglin Experimental Concrete Grain Elevator, Saint Louis Park 12/21/81
Pillsbury A Mill, Minneapolis 11/13/66
Washburn A Mill Complex, Minneapolis 5/4/83
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
242
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
243
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
244
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
245
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
246
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
247
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
248
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
249
SECTION 7 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE & CRITICAL FACILITY INDEX (CFI) RANKING
Critical facilities and infrastructure are those that are essential to the health and welfare of the population.
These become especially important after a hazard event. Critical facilities typically include police and fire
stations, schools, and emergency operation centers. Critical infrastructure can also include roads and
bridges that provide ingress and egress and allow emergency vehicles access to those in need, and the
utilities that provide water, electricity, and communication services to the community.
7.1. Critical Facilities Index (CFI) Numbering Scoring System
For this update to the mitigation plan, Hennepin County Emergency Management (HCEM) ranked the
restoration priority of a facility using a score index of 1 to 5, 1 being the most critical to the overall health
of the community. Jurisdiction understand this as those critical facilities within their community that must
operate during times of disaster. The score is identified as an “all‐hazards” CFI, which applies to private
and public critical facilities and is directly related to business continuity and continuity of government.
The following are definitions of each score index:
CFI Priority 1: facility is identified as "critical" to public health, safety. These include Hospitals and
emergency medical facilities, emergency shelters, fire stations, police stations, prisons/jails, fire
rescue facilities, water pumping and wastewater facilities, major communication facilities, major
flood control structures, financial institutions, military installations, and critical electric utility
facilities. If possible, must be operational within 2 hours.
CFI Priority 2: facility may include some of the same types of facilities described for CFI Priority 1.
These facilities provide significant public services but are deemed to be somewhat less critical by
government agencies. These include Nursing homes, major water and sewer facilities, fire and
police stations, minor flood control structures, fuel transfer/loading facilities (ports), airports,
schools and park facilities used to support other critical government purposes. If possible, must
be operational within 8 hours.
CFI Priority 3: facility may include some of the same types of facilities described for CFI Priority 2
above. These facilities provide public services but are deemed to be somewhat less critical by
government agencies. These include apartment complexes for the elderly, assisted living
facilities, grocery distribution/large cold storage facilities, local water and sewer facilities, local
fire and police stations, medical service facilities (such as dialysis centers) and facilities having
critical impact on the environment. If possible, must be operational within 48 hours.
CFI Priority 4: These facilities provide public services but are deemed to be somewhat less critical
by government agencies, and include: supermarkets, banks, gas stations, hotels/motels, and
lodging. If possible, must be operational within 72 hours.
CFI Priority 5: These facilities provide a public service but are deemed to be less critical that the
other priority tiers.
CFI is used by HCEM with the intent for the coordination of restoration and post disaster economic
re‐development and in coordination with infrastructure service providers. This information is intended to
improve communication with local EOCs and other coordination centers during any type of emergency
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 2 – Hazard Inventory
250
event. This scoring system, as well as planning during normal operations, will ensure that community
services are restored in a flexible and coordinated manner.
The following communities participated in the Critical Facilities Index 1‐5 priorities risk assessment. Each
community used the 19 hazards in this plan and determined if the hazard affects their pre‐identified
priority 1 facilities.
Bloomington
Brooklyn Center
Brooklyn Park
Champlin
Corcoran
Crystal
Dayton
Deephaven
Eden Prairie
Edina
Excelsior
Golden Valley
Greenfield
Greenwood
Hanover
Hopkins
Independence
Long Lake
Loretto
Maple Grove
Maple Plain
Medicine Lake
Medina
Minneapolis
Minnetonka
Minnetonka Beach
Minnetrista
Mound
New Hope
Orono
Osseo
Plymouth
Richfield
Robbinsdale
Rockford
Rogers
Saint Anthony
Saint Bonifacius
Saint Louis Park
Shorewood
Spring Park
Tonka Bay
Wayzata
Woodland
Each city has two documents in this section.
1. The CFI 1 Facilities Hazard Vulnerability Assessment.
2. The Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources Overview
2024 HENNEPIN COUNTY
MULTI‐JURISDICTIONAL
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
VOLUME 3
Community Mitigation Strategies
01 February 2024
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
HENNEPIN COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, Minnesota 55304
February 1, 2024
On behalf of Hennepin County Emergency Management (HCEM), we are pleased to present the
2024 Hennepin County Multi‐Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan.
The purpose of this plan is to identify the Counties major hazards, assess the vulnerability, and
to reduce risk using a variety of data and best practice measures to implement mitigation
projects. This plan identifies goals, objectives, recommended actions, and costs by reviewing
and working on initiatives with each county jurisdiction or partner to reduce and/prevent injury
and damage from hazardous events. The intent of the Plan is to provide unified guidance for
coordinating mitigation efforts prior to or following a major emergency/disaster by
implementing an on‐going comprehensive county hazard mitigation strategy intended to
reduce the impact of loss of life and property due to effects of natural hazards.
Through continued collaboration with each jurisdiction by providing staff expertise, support,
training and education opportunities, Hennepin County Emergency Management will continue
to increase its resiliency to minimize the effects of natural hazards.
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
TABLE OF CONTENTS - VOLUME 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................... 5
SECTION 1: MITIGATION STRATEGY, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .................................................... 7
1.1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 7
1.2: 2024 HENNEPIN COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS ..................................................... 7
SECTION 2: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN ....................................................................................... 9
2.1: SELECTION OF MITIGATION ACTIONS ................................................................................. 9
2.2: PRIORITIZATION OF MITIGATION ACTIONS ........................................................................ 9
2.3: IMPLEMENTATION OF MITIGATION ACTIONS .................................................................... 9
SECTION 3: MITIGATION ACTIONS AND PROJECTS .................................................................... 11
3.1: JURISDICTION PARTICIPATION .......................................................................................... 11
3.2: FUNDING SOURCES ........................................................................................................... 12
3.1.1: CITY OF BLOOMINGTON ................................................................................................ 13
3.1.2: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ........................................................................................... 23
3.1.3: CITY OF BROOKLYN PARK ............................................................................................... 29
3.1.4: CITY OF CHAMPLIN ........................................................................................................ 35
3.1.5: CITY OF CHANHASSEN ................................................................................................... 43
3.1.6: CITY OF CORCORAN ....................................................................................................... 47
3.1.7: CITY OF CRYSTAL ............................................................................................................ 53
3.1.8: CITY OF DAYTON ............................................................................................................ 65
3.1.9: CITY OF DEEPHAVEN ...................................................................................................... 73
3.1.10: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ................................................................................................. 79
3.1.11: CITY OF EDINA ............................................................................................................. 85
3.1.12: CITY OF EXCELSIOR ...................................................................................................... 93
3.1.13: FORT SNELLING ............................................................................................................ 97
3.1.14: CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY ........................................................................................... 101
3.1.15: CITY OF GREENFIELD .................................................................................................. 105
3.1.16: CITY OF GREENWOOD ............................................................................................... 111
3.1.17: CITY OF HANOVER ..................................................................................................... 115
3.1.18: CITY OF HOPKINS ....................................................................................................... 119
3.1.19: CITY OF INDEPENDENCE ............................................................................................ 125
3.1.20: CITY OF LONG LAKE.................................................................................................... 135
3.1.21: CITY OF LORETTO ....................................................................................................... 139
3.1.22: CITY OF MAPLE GROVE .............................................................................................. 143
3.1.23: CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN ................................................................................................ 151
3.1.24: CITY OF MEDICINE LAKE ............................................................................................. 159
3.1.25: CITY OF MEDINA ........................................................................................................ 163
3.1.26: CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS ............................................................................................... 169
3.1.27: CITY OF MINNETONKA ............................................................................................... 187
3.1.28: CITY OF MINNETONKA BEACH ................................................................................... 193
3.1.29: CITY OF MINNETRISTA ............................................................................................... 199
3.1.30: CITY OF MOUND ........................................................................................................ 203
3.1.31: MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ................................................. 213
3.1.32: CITY OF NEW HOPE .................................................................................................... 215
3.1.33: CITY OF ORONO ......................................................................................................... 227
3.1.34: CITY OF OSSEO ........................................................................................................... 231
3.1.35: CITY OF PLYMOUTH ................................................................................................... 235
3.1.36: CITY OF RICHFIELD ..................................................................................................... 243
3.1.37: CITY OF ROBBINSDALE ............................................................................................... 255
3.1.38: CITY OF ROCKFORD .................................................................................................... 261
3.1.39: CITY OF ROGERS ........................................................................................................ 265
3.1.40: CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY ........................................................................................... 275
3.1.41: CITY OF SAINT BONIFACIUS ....................................................................................... 287
3.1.42: CITY OF SAINT LOUIS PARK ........................................................................................ 291
3.1.43: CITY OF SHOREWOOD ................................................................................................ 303
3.1.44: CITY OF SPRING PARK ................................................................................................ 307
3.1.45: CITY OF TONKA BAY ................................................................................................... 311
3.1.46: CITY OF WAYZATA ...................................................................................................... 317
3.1.47: CITY OF WOODLAND .................................................................................................. 321
3.1.48: HENNEPIN COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ..................................................... 327
SECTION 4: MINNESOTA MITIGATION CROSSWALK ................................................................ 331
4.1: MINNESOTA CROSSWALK – LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW TOOL ............ 331
4.1.1: REGULATION CHECKLIST .............................................................................................. 333
4.1.2: MULTI‐JURISDICTIONAL SUMMARY SHEET .................................................................. 339
SECTION 5: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................ 343
SECTION 6: GLOSSARY .............................................................................................................. 345
SECTION 7: APPENDICES ........................................................................................................... 347
APPENDIX A: APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATIONS ............................................. 347
APPENDIX B: HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADOPTION ........... 349
APPENDIX C: FEMA APPROVAL .............................................................................................. 353
APPENDIX D: MUNICIPAL AND LOCAL AGENCY ADOPTIONS ................................................. 355
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community and Mitigation Strategies
7
1.1. INTRODUCTION
The mitigation strategy provides a blueprint for Hennepin County to enhance its resiliency against a wide
spectrum of natural hazards. It is based on the efforts of the Planning Team, the findings and conclusions
of the Risk Assessment, and input from the public and stakeholders. The mitigation strategy includes
hazard mitigation objectives and hazard mitigation actions. The objectives serve as the guiding principles
for local future mitigation policy and project administration; actions serve as implemental items that
support and provide a way to reach those objectives. The mitigation strategy includes a process for
evaluating mitigation actions to ensure actions are feasible based on community capabilities, tied to plan
goals, and effective in reducing hazard losses for current and future structures and populations. This
section outlines the goals, objectives, and mitigation action evaluation and prioritization process
undertaken in Hennepin County. Each jurisdiction provided objectives, actions and prioritization and are
included in the Mitigation Action Plan (MAP), which can be found for each jurisdiction located in Section
3: Mitigation Plans
1.2. 2024 HENNEPIN COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN GOALS C3a
The plan goals are broad and reflect current needs and priorities of the county. They are intended to
reduce long‐term vulnerability to all hazards identified in this plan. The 2024 Hennepin County AHMJMP
goals were developed by the Mitigation Steering Committee and reviewed by the regional planning
working group. The planning team reviewed the goals and opted to keep the goals as written. The
mitigation planning goals are listed in TABLE 1‐2A
TABLE 1‐2A Hennepin County Mitigation Goals
Goal Number Goal
1 Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the
environment from natural and man‐made hazards.
2 Increase education, outreach, and awareness.
3 Protect natural and cultural resources.
4 Identify areas of greatest impact from hazards.
5 Enhance hazard mitigation coordination and communication with federal, state
and local governments.
6 Promote disaster‐resistant future development.
7 Build and support local capacity and commitment to become less vulnerable to
hazards.
8 Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable
populations, and those with access and functional needs.
9 Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the
economy, and the environment.
10 Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines
and critical infrastructure in becoming more resistant to failure and resilient to
natural hazards.
SECTION 1 MITIGATION STRATEGY, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community and Mitigation Strategies
8
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community and Mitigation Strategies
9
SECTION 2 MITIGATION ACTION PLAN
2.1. SELECTION OF MITIGATION ACTIONS E2a
Selected objectives and actions are provided within this volume. This volume is a functional plan for action
and is considered to be the most essential part of the mitigation planning process. This volume includes a
prioritized listing of proposed hazard mitigation actions (policies and projects) for each participating
jurisdiction. Each action includes accompanying information such as the department responsible for
completing the action, timeline, and cost estimate.
This volume provides each jurisdiction a description of their plan in implementing mitigation actions
providing an opportunity to reduce vulnerability over time. Further, the volume provides a mechanism to
monitor progress over time. Each action also considers the benefits and costs of an action, to ensure it is
cost effective, which is included in the priority. These actions are reviewed and revised by each
municipality, who prioritize these actions based on their own specific needs.
2.2. PRIORITIZATION OF MITIGATION ACTIONS C5a
All actions are considered cost‐effective including a cost‐benefit review for prioritization. In addition, local
knowledge or need, may necessitate a change in priority from the guidelines presented for priority below:
A priority number scale has been used with 1 being top priority and sequential numbers being less
priority. The scale may be limited on the number of identified actions for any objective listed.
• Low Priority Projects: Projects that is associated with low or infrequent hazard probability and
least likely to prevent loss of life. (Scale 8‐10)
• Medium Priority Projects: Projects associated with a less probable hazard with potential to
save lives or damage to property. (Scale 4‐7)
• High Priority Projects: Projects identified in response to one or more of the highest probability
hazards combined with the ability to save lives. (Scale 1‐3)
2.3. IMPLEMENTATION OF MITIGATION ACTIONS
This volume includes several measures to ensure actions are implemented. HCEM will serve as the
coordinating agency. However, each action is tied to a responsible agency or individual who will be
responsible for leading the completion of the mitigation action. By assigning responsibility, it increases
accountability and the likelihood of action.
In addition to the assignment of a local lead department or agency, an implementation time period or a
specific implementation date has been considered to assess whether actions are being implemented in a
timely fashion. Further, the county continues to look for and research funding sources to implement
mitigation projects in both the pre‐disaster and post‐disaster environments. Potential funding sources
continue to be discussed for proposed actions listed in this volume.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community and Mitigation Strategies
10
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community and Mitigation Strategies
11
SECTION 3 MITIGATION ACTIONS AND PROJECTS
3.1. JURISDICTION PARTICIPATION
The following list contains each jurisdiction, the point of contact, title, agency, and which group they have
planning membership. Each planning group routinely meets 4‐12 times a year to meet the planning needs
and requirements for their jurisdiction. Each planning group accounts for its own membership,
participation, and completion of the requirements within this plan. Participation is voluntary.
Jurisdiction Point of Contact Title Agency How participated
Bloomington U. Seal Fire Chief Fire Department South Region Planning
Brooklyn Center T. Berg Fire Chief Fire Department North Region Planning
Brooklyn Park S. Conway Fire Chief Fire Department North Region Planning
Champlin T. Schmidt Police Chief Law Enforcement North Region Planning
Corcoran M. Gottschalk Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
Crystal M. Ray Dir of Public Works City of Crystal North Region Planning
Dayton G. Henrickson Fire Chief Fire Department North Region Planning
Deephaven C. Johnson Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
Eden Prairie S. Gerber Fire Chief Fire Department South Region Planning
Edina A. Slama Fire Chief Fire Department South Region Planning
Excelsior B. Tholen, C.
Mackey
Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
Fort Snelling B. Kelii Deputy Director HCEM County Planning
Golden Valley J. Crelly Fire Chief Fire Department North Region Planning
Greenfield M. Webb City Administrator City of Greenfield Lakes Region Planning
Greenwood M. Meehan Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
Hanover J. Nash Emergency Mgr. City of Hanover County Planning
Hopkins D. Specken Fire Chief Fire Department South Region Planning
Independence G. Kroells Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
Long Lake M. Schultz Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
Loretto J. Nelson Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
Maple Grove T. Bush Fire Chief Fire Department North Region Planning
Maple Plain G. Kroells Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
Medicine Lake J. Hauble City Admin City of Medicine Lake North Region Planning
Medina J. Nelson Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
Minneapolis E. Gustafson Emergency Mgr. City of Minneapolis County Planning
Minnetonka
Beach
C. Farniok Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
Minnetonka A. Morris Fire Chief‐ Assist Fire Department South Region Planning
Minnetrista P. Falls Dir of Public Safety Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
Mound G. Pederson Fire Chief Fire Department Lakes Region Planning
Minneapolis/St.
Paul International
Airport
K. Rollwagen/ B.
Lane
Emergency Mgr. MSP Airport County Planning
New Hope S. Larson Fire Chief City of New Hope North Region Planning
Orono C. Farniok Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community and Mitigation Strategies
12
Jurisdiction Point of Contact Title Agency How participated
Osseo S. Mikkelson Police Chief Law Enforcement North Region Planning
Plymouth E. Fadden Police Chief Law Enforcement North Region Planning
Richfield J. Henthorne Police Chief Law Enforcement South Region Planning
Robbinsdale P. Foley Police Chief Law Enforcement North Region Planning
Rockford R. Harkins Fire Fire Department County Planning
Rogers B. Feist/ P.
Farrens
Fire Chief Fire Department North Region Planning
Shorewood B. Tholen, C.
Mackey
Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
Spring Park C. Farniok Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
St. Anthony M. Sitarz Fire Chief Fire Department North Region Planning
St. Bonifacius P. Falls Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
St. Louis Park S. Koering Fire Chief Fire Department South Region Planning
Tonka Bay B. Tholen, C.
Mackey
Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
Wayzata M. Schultz Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
Woodland C. Johnson Police Chief Law Enforcement Lakes Region Planning
3.2. Funding Sources
Mitigation Projects can receive funding through a variety of sources. This document will detail common
funding sources that have potential applications for each project. The below indicators will be used for
each project to reduce the size of this document:
Indicator: Potential Funding Source:
1 Local Funds
2 State Funds
3 Federal Funds
4 Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC)
5 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)
6 Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA)
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
13
3.3.1. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON C4a, C4b, C5b, E2B
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
14
2024 Bloomington Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Flooding/Dam Failure: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to failure
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Update inundation map every 10 years PW Undetermined 6 Months Complete
1A2 Review and compare existing flood control
standards, zoning, and building requirements
CD Undetermined 1 Year Ongoing Low 1
1A3 Review and update policies that discourage
growth in flood‐prone areas
CD Undetermined 3 Months Ongoing Low 1
1A4 Review and update city wide evacuation plan EM NA 6 Months Incomplete Low 1
1A5 Periodically exercise flood/dam failure
response actions
EM, PW NA 8 Months Ongoing Low 1, 3
1A6 Update flooding/dam failure response actions
in Regional EOP
EM Undetermined 6 Months Incomplete Low 1
Objective 1B: Wildland Fire: Develop a comprehensive approach reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to wildfire
1B1 Develop and publicize evacuation plans and
routes in areas threatened by wildland fires, as
resources are available
FD Undetermined 1 Year Incomplete Low 1
1B2 Ensure defensible firefighting space is afforded
adjacent to wildland and open space areas in
new developments, as resources are available
FD Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing 5 1, 2, 5
Objective 1C: Hazardous Material Release
1C1 Facility inspections for code compliance and
planning to include protect in
place/evacuation strategies
FD Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1C2 Maintain data on materials in fixed facilities FD Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1C3 Train/plan for transportation related HazMat
emergencies
FD Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1, 2
1C4 Train for HazMat emergencies in fixed facilities FD Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1, 2
Objective 1D: Terrorism
1D1 Continue to collaborate with LE, MNJAC and
emergency service partners to maintain
situational awareness of possible threats
FD, PD, MA Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
15
1D2 Plan/Train for terrorism incident response and
recovery
FD, PD Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1, 3
1D3 Maintain basic terrorism response capabilities‐
Chempack, detection, decon, etc.
FD, PD Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing 2 1, 3
Objective 1E: Severe Weather
1E1 Maintain outdoor warning/alert capability‐
cities 22 warning sirens
FD Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1E2 Increase severe weather awareness FD, EM Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1E3 Encourage severe weather planning in
residential and commercial occupancies.
FD, EM Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 1F: Critical Infrastructure Failure
1F1 Critical infrastructure failure planning‐ water
systems, communication systems and power
EM, FD, PD,
PW, CD
Undetermined 6 Months Ongoing 3 1, 4
1F2 Maintain/Revise the city’s Continuity of
Operations (COOP) and Emergency Operations
Plan (EOP)
FD, EM Undetermined 6 Months Ongoing 1 1
1F3 Contingency planning for vulnerable
populations
FD, EM, CS Undetermined 8 Months Ongoing Low 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Publicize and encourage the adoption of
appropriate hazard mitigation actions
EM, FD Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2A2 Provide information to the public on the city
website and through public education
opportunities
EM, FD, CS Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2B: Promote partnerships between the state, county, local jurisdictions, and partner agencies to identify, prioritize, and implement
mitigation actions
2B1 Participate as a member in local or regional
hazard mitigation planning groups
PW, FD, PD Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2B2 Support or provide public sector events,
workshops, symposiums, and continued
education opportunities
FD, EM, CS Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
16
Objective 2C: Work with Chamber of Commerce, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in local community
2C1 Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard
mitigation principles and practices
FD, PW, PD,
EM
Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2C2 Encourage businesses to develop and
implement hazard mitigation actions
FD, EM, PD,
PW
Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2C3 Support or provide private sector events,
workshops, symposiums, and continued
education opportunities
FD, EM, PW,
PD
Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Work with watershed districts to address water quality and storm water planning
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Update/adjust comprehensive plan to reflect
system capabilities for extreme events
CD, PW, FD,
PD, CS
Undetermined 1 Year Ongoing Low 1
3A2 Monitor current systems for potential
weakness or failures and ability to adjust
EM Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 3B: Maintain protections and monitor the Native American burial mounds on public and private property
3B1 Continue to monitor public and private
properties for development/encroachments
into protected sites
CD Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 3C: Maintain parks and support National Wildlife Refuge
3C1 Monitor for drought impact and invasive
species
P&R, FD, PW Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
3C2 Wildfire suppression/ and assist in wildland
management of fuels
FD, P&R Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing 4 1, 2, 5
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Update flood zone maps
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Work with FEMA, Watershed Districts, and
City Engineer to update/maintain current
flood zone maps to reflect current and
potential event predictions. Evaluate new
PW, FD, EM Undetermined 2 Years Ongoing Low 1, 5, 6
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
17
models that increase impacted properties and
intense event levels
Objective 4B: Update/maintain vulnerable populations locations and readiness capabilities
4B1 Identify nursing homes, assisted living care
facilities and group homes COOP planning and
resilience/self‐reliance capabilities and
measures
CD, FD, CS/PH,
EM
Undetermined 1 Year Ongoing Low 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Utilize current models and predictions for development requirements
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Enforce existing codes to ensure
developments meet standards
CD, FD Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
6A2 Encourage disaster resistant development
plans for new developments and
redevelopments
CD, FD Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Maintain COOP planning effort
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Update the city COOP FD, EM Undetermined 6 Months In process 1 1
7A2 TTX the COOP to identify gaps FD, EM Undetermined 8 Months 2nd ¼ 2024 1 1
Objective 7B: Maintain EOP/EOC planning effort and capabilities
7B1 Update the EOP FD, EM Undetermined 6 Months 2nd ¼ 2024 Low 1
7B2 TTX the EOP and practice EOC activation EM Undetermined 8 Months 3rd ¼ 2024 Low 1
Objective 7C: Encourage EOP/COOP planning effort for our business and non‐profit partners in the community
7C1 Outreach and assist community business and
non‐profit in the EOP/COOP planning effort to
increase community resiliency
FD, EM Undetermined 2 Years Planned Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
18
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
19
Bloomington 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Flooding/Dam Failure: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of
damage and losses due to failure
Project Title/Action 1A1: Update inundation map every 10 years
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 1A2: Review and compare existing flood control standards, zoning, and
building requirements
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 1A3: Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐prone
areas
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 1A4: Review and update city wide evacuation plan
Project Status Incomplete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 1A5: Periodically exercise flood/dam failure response actions
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 1A6: Update flooding/dam failure response actions in regional EOP
Project Status Incomplete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1B: Wildland Fire: Develop a comprehensive approach reducing the possibility of damage and
losses due to wildfire
Project Title/Action 1B1: Develop and publicize evacuation plans and routes in areas
threatened by wildland fires, as resources are available
Project Status Incomplete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 1B2: Ensure defensible firefighting space is afforded adjacent to wildland
and open space areas in new developments, as resources are available
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1C: Hazardous Material Release
Project Title/Action 1C1: Facility inspections for code compliance and planning to include
protect in place/evacuation strategies
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 1C2: Maintain data on materials in fixed facilities
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 1C3: Train/plan for transportation related HazMat emergencies
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 1C4: Train for HazMat emergencies in fixed facilities
Project Status Ongoing
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
20
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1D: Terrorism
Project Title/Action 1D1: Continue to collaborate with LE, MNJAC, and emergency service
partners to maintain situational awareness of possible threats
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 1D2: Plan/Train for terrorism incident response and recovery
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 1D3: Maintain basic terrorism response capabilities – Chempack, detection,
decon, etc.
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1E: Severe Weather
Project Title/Action 1E1: Maintain outdoor warning/alert capability – cities 22 warning sirens
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 1E2: Increase severe weather awareness
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 1E3: Encourage severe weather planning in residential and commercial
occupancies
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1F: Critical Infrastructure Failure
Project Title/Action 1F1: Critical infrastructure failure planning – water systems,
communication systems and power
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 1F2: Maintain/Revise the city’s Continuity of Operations (COOP) and
Emergency Operations Plan (EOP)
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 1F3: Contingency planning for vulnerable populations
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Educate the Public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions
Project Title/Action 2A1: Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard
mitigation actions
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 2A2: Provide information to the public on the city website and through
public education opportunities
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
21
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Promote partnerships between the state, county, local jurisdictions, and partner agencies to
identify, prioritize, and implement mitigation actions
Project Title/Action 2B1: Participate as a member in local or regional hazard mitigation
planning groups
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 2B2: Support or provide public sector events, workshops, symposiums, and
continued education opportunities
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2C: Work with Chamber of Commerce, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard
mitigation in local community
Project Title/Action 2C1: Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles
and practices
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 2C2: Encourage businesses to develop and implement hazard mitigation
actions
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 2C3: Support or provide private sector events, workshops, symposiums,
and continued education opportunities
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Work with watershed districts to address water quality and storm water planning
Project Title/Action 3A1: Update/adjust comprehensive plan to reflect system capabilities for
extreme events
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 3A2: Monitor current systems for potential weakness or failures and ability
to adjust
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 3B: Maintain protections and monitor the Native American burial mounds on public and private
properties
Project Title/Action 3B1: Continue to monitor public and private properties for
development/encroachments into protected sites
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 3C: Maintain parks and support National Wildlife Refuge
Project Title/Action 3C1: Monitor for drought impact and invasive species
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 3C2: Wildlife suppression/ and assist in wildland management of fuels
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
22
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Update flood zone maps
Project Title/Action 4A1: Work with FEMA, Watershed Districts, and City Engineer to
update/maintain current flood zone maps to reflect current and potential
event predictions. Evaluate new models that increase impacted propertied
and intense event levels
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 4B: Update/maintain vulnerable populations locations and readiness capabilities
Project Title/Action 4B1: Identify nursing homes, assisted living care facilities and group homes
COOP planning and resilience/self‐reliance capabilities and measures
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Utilize current models and predictions for development requirements
Project Title/Action 6A1: Enforce existing codes to ensure developments meet standards
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 6A2: Encourage disaster resistant development plans for new
developments and redevelopments
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Maintain COOP planning effort
Project Title/Action 7A1: Update the City COOP
Project Status In Progress
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 7A2: TTX the COOP to identify gaps
Project Status In Progress
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 7B: Maintain EOP/EOC planning effort and capabilities
Project Title/Action 7B1: Update the EOP
Project Status In Progress
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
Project Title/Action 7B2: TTX the COOP to identify gaps
Project Status In Progress
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 7C: Encourage EOP/COOP planning effort for our businesses and non‐profit partners in the
community
Project Title/Action 7C1: Outreach and assist community businesses and non‐profit in the
EOP/COOP planning effort to increase community resiliency
Project Status In Progress
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
23
3.3.2. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
24
2024 Brooklyn Center Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Preparation for Severe Weather Response
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Adopt the new Emergency Operation Plan and
safety manual then train employees.
City of
Brooklyn Ctr.
10,000 Short Ongoing 1 1
1A2 Construct a new Public Works garage that allows for
improved operations, space for new and existing
equipment, and storage of materials.
City of
Brooklyn Ctr.
$20,000,000‐
$30,000,000
Medium Delayed Medium 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Educate and inform the public and local businesses on how to better prepare and protect themselves from the impacts of
severe weather
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Develop an Emergency Preparedness website which
could educate the public and local businesses about
how to prepare their homes and businesses from
effects of severe weather. Due to the diversity
within the community this information will need to
be translated into various languages
City of
Brooklyn Ctr.
$25,000 Long In progress Med 1
Objective 2B: Notify and inform the public
2B1 Purchase and install electronic reader boards at key
critical infrastructure locations to aid in the
dissemination of emergency information.
City of
Brooklyn Ctr.
$120,000 Medium Ongoing Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
25
None
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Bury All Overhead Power Lines
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work within the community and Xcel Energy to
identify all power lines which could be buried to
reduce significant power failures throughout the
community
City of
Brooklyn Ctr.
$5,000,000‐
$20,000,000
Long Continuous Low 1, 4, 5
Objective 7B: Provide auxiliary power
7B1 Install an emergency generator at City
Hall/Community Center so the facility could be used
as a congregate care facility
City of
Brooklyn Ctr.
$300,000
Medium Will work in
with the
new
building
construction
Med 1, 4, 5
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
8A1 Community outreach programs through the OPCHS,
Opioid training, etc.
City of
Brooklyn Ctr.
$60,000 –
90,000
(Opioid
funds)
Short Planning 2 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
26
8A2 ART team model Henn CO./
City of
Brooklyn Ctr.
$80k – 120k Short Likely
starting
early 2024
3 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
9A1 Electrify the City’s fleet of vehicles; this would
include installing charging stations at City buildings
City of
Brooklyn Ctr.
$1,000,000‐
$5,000,000
Long Ongoing Long 1, 3
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
27
Brooklyn Center 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Preparation for Severe Weather Response
Project Title/Action 1A1: Upgrade technology within the EOC to aid in better mitigation of a
natural or manmade disaster
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1A2: Improve the capability of the community’s backup EOC
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City of Brooklyn Center
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Educate and inform the public and local businesses on how to better prepare and protect
themselves from the impacts of severe weather
Project Title/Action 2A1: Develop an Emergency Preparedness website which could educate
the public and local businesses about how to prepare their homes and
businesses from effects of severe weather. Due to the diversity within the
community, this information will need to be translated into various
languages
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency City of Brooklyn Center
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Notify and inform the public
Project Title/Action 2B1: Purchase and install electronic reader boards at key critical
infrastructure locations to aid in the dissemination of emergency
information
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 2B2: Purchase an emergency notification system, such as Everbridge, to aid
in the dissemination of emergency information
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency City of Brooklyn Center
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury All Overhead Power Lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work within the community and Xcel Energy to identify all power lines
which could be buried to reduce significant power failures throughout the
community
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City of Brooklyn Center
OBJECTIVE: 7B: Provide auxiliary power
Project Title/Action 7B1: Install an emergency generator at City Hall/Community Center so the
facility could be used as a congregate care facility
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency City of Brooklyn Center
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
28
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
29
3.3.3. CITY OF BROOKLYN PARK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
30
2024 Brooklyn Park Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Improve preparation for Severe Weather Response
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Upgrade technology within the EOC to aid in a
better mitigation of a natural or manmade disaster.
Brooklyn Park
Fire/EM
Department
$50,000 Short In‐Progress 1 1
1A2 Improve the capability of the community back‐up
EOC.
Brooklyn Park
Fire/EM
Department
$20,000 Medium Reviewing 2 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Educate and inform the public and local businesses on how to better prepare and protect themselves from the impacts of
severe weather
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Update the department website to include sections
for Emergency Preparedness which could educate
the public and local businesses about how to
prepare their homes and businesses from effects of
severe weather. Due to the diversity within the
community this information will need to be
translated into various languages
Brooklyn Park
Fire/EM
Department
$10,000 Short In‐Progress 3 1
Objective 2B: Notify and inform the public
2B1 Purchase an emergency notification system such as
Everbridge to aid in the dissemination of
emergency information.
Brooklyn Park
Fire/EM
Department
$20,000 Short Reviewing 4 1, 3
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to a hazardous materials spill
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
31
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Continue to use Brooklyn Park GIS to map and
update locations of fixed facilities using hazardous
materials and associated transportation routes in a
timely manner.
Brooklyn Park
Fire/EM
Department
No Cost Ongoing Ongoing 7 1
4A2 Provide Railroad & Pipeline Safety Awareness Level
training for First Responders.
Brooklyn Park
Fire/EM
Department
No Cost Short/Ong
oing
Ongoing 5 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Bury all overhead power lines
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work within the community and Xcel Energy to
identify all power lines which could be buried to
reduce significant power failures throughout the
community.
Brooklyn Park
Fire/EM
Department
$2,500,000 Long Reviewing 6 1, 4, 5
Objective 7B: Educate first responders to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions
7B1 Ensure that all essential city departments (police,
fire, public works) have the latest edition of the
Emergency Response Guidebook
Brooklyn Park
Fire/EM
Department
No Cost Ongoing Ongoing 8 1, 2
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
32
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
33
Brooklyn Park 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Improve preparation for Severe Weather Response
Project Title/Action 1A1: Upgrade technology within the EOC to aid in a better mitigation of a
natural or manmade disaster
Project Status Anticipated completion date: June 2026
Project Title/Action 1A2: Improve the capability of the community back‐up EOC
Project Status Anticipated completion date: June 2026
Responsible Agency Brooklyn Park Fire / EM Department
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Educate and inform the public and local businesses on how to better prepare and protect
themselves from the impacts of severe weather
Project Title/Action 2A1: Update the department website to include sections for Emergency
Preparedness, which could educate the public and local businesses about
how to prepare their homes and businesses from the effects of severe
weather. Due to the diversity within the community, this information will
need to be translated into various languages
Project Status Anticipated completion date: June 2024
Responsible Agency Brooklyn Park Fire / EM Department
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Notify and inform the public
Project Title/Action 2B1: Purchase an emergency notification system, such as Everbridge, to aid
in the dissemination of emergency information
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency Brooklyn Park Fire / EM Departments
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to a
hazardous materials spill
Project Title/Action 4A1: Continue to use Brooklyn Park GIS to map and update locations of
fixed facilities using hazardous materials and associated transportation
routes in a timely manner
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 4A2: Provide Railroad & Pipeline Safety Awareness Level training for First
Responders
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2024
Responsible Agency Brooklyn Park Fire / EM Department
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury All Overhead Power lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work within the community and Xcel Energy to identify all power lines
which could be buried to reduce significant power failures throughout the
community
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency Brooklyn Park Fire / EM Department
OBJECTIVE: 7B: Educate first responders to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation
actions
Project Title/Action 7B1: Ensure that all essential city departments (police, fire, public works)
have the latest edition of the Emergency Response Guidebook
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Brooklyn Park Fire / EM Department
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
34
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
35
3.3.4. CITY OF CHAMPLIN
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
36
2024 Champlin Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Flood Forecasting
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Work with a wide range of stakeholders to have a river
gauge installed on the Mississippi river
City/DNR $40,000
Installatio
n
(L)3‐5 yrs Complete
Objective 1B: Effective No Wake Activation
1B1 Work with a wide range of stakeholders to have a river
gauge installed on the Mississippi river
City/DNR $40,000
$18,000
(L)3‐5yrs Complete
Objective 1C: Wellhead Protection
1C1 The wellhead protection plan identifies potential
hazards to the groundwater supply from infiltration of
wells that are not properly capped or protected
City Engineer $20,000 (M)10yrs Ongoing 3 1
Objective 1D: Protection and Safeguarding of Vital City Data
1D1 Improve the Data Backup and protection Protocols for
City records
City IT $22,000
$4,000
(M)5yrs Ongoing 1 1
Objective 1E: Protection and Safeguarding of Vital City Data
1E1 Improve Campus Security in the event of a large‐scale
protest or civil disobedience
City PW
Director/Police
$1.5
Million
3‐5 yrs Ongoing 2 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Flood Forecasting
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Work with a wide range of stakeholders to have a river
gauge installed on the Mississippi river
City/DNR $40,000
Installatio
n
(L)3‐5yrs Complete
Objective 2B: Shoreline Stabilization
2B1 Work with a wide range of stakeholders to improve
shoreline stabilization on Elm Creek and the Mississippi
River
City / NNR /
Watershed
$150,000
x3=
$450,000.
00
(L)20yr Complete
Objective 2C: Wellhead Protection Plan
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
37
2C1 The wellhead protection plan is updated every 10 years
and identifies potential hazards to the groundwater
supply from infiltration of wells that are not properly
capped or protected.
City Engineer $20,000 (M)10yrs Ongoing 3 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Shoreline Stabilization
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Work with a wide range of stakeholders to improve
shoreline stabilization on the Mississippi River and
repair riverbank erosion
City / NNR /
Watershed
$150,000
x3=
$450,000.
00
(L)20yr Ongoing Low 1, 2, 5
3A2 Work with a wide range of stakeholders to improve
shoreline stabilization on the Champlin Mill Pond and
repair reservoir erosion
City / NNR /
Watershed
$150,000
x3=
$450,000.
00
(L)20yr Ongoing Low 1, 2, 5
3A3 Work with a wide range of stakeholders to improve
shoreline stabilization on Elm Creek
City / NNR /
Watershed
$150,000
x3=
$450,000.
00
(L)20yr Ongoing 5 1, 2, 5
Objective 3B: Wellhead Protection Plan
3B1 The wellhead protection plan is updated every 10 years
and identifies potential hazards to the groundwater
supply from infiltration of wells that are not properly
capped or protected
City Engineer $20,000 (M)10yrs Ongoing 3 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Update the wellhead protection plan to identify
potential hazards to the groundwater supply from
infiltration of wells that are not properly capped or
protected.
City Engineer $20,000 (M)10yrs Ongoing 3 1
Objective 4B: Flood Forecasting
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
38
4B1 Work with a wide range of stakeholders to install a river
gauge
City/DNR $40,000
Installatio
n
(L)3‐5yrs Complete
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Flood Forecasting
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Work with a wide range of stakeholders to install a river
gauge
City/DNR $18,000
Annual
Maintena
nce
(L)3‐5yrs Complete
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Protection and Safeguarding of Vital City Data
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Improve the data backup and protection protocols for
city records
City IT $22,000
$4,000
(M)5yrs Ongoing 1 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
39
9A1 Shoreline restoration of the Elm Creek as water levels
change due to projected Climate change effecting
source waters
City Engineer $450,000 6 Months Ongoing Low 1, 5
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
10A1 Upgrade and replace City Campus generator to ensure
continuity of government services should a large‐scale
power outage occur
City Utility
Services
$1.1
Million
5 years Ongoing 4 1, 4, 5
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
40
Champlin 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Flood Forecasting
Project Title/Action 1A1: Work with a wide range of stakeholders to have a river gauge installed
on the Mississippi River
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City/DNR
OBJECTIVE: 1B: Effective No Wake Activation
Project Title/Action 1B1: Work with a wide range of stakeholders to have a river gauge installed
on the Mississippi River
Project Status Complete
Summary of Project River Gauge Annual Maintenance
Responsible Agency City/DNR
OBJECTIVE: 1C: Wellhead Protection
Project Title/Action 1C1: The wellhead protection plan identified potential hazards to the
groundwater supply from infiltration of wells that are not properly capped
or protected
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City Engineer
OBJECTIVE: 1D: Protection and Safeguarding of Vital City Data
Project Title/Action 1D1: Improve the Data Backup and protection Protocols for City records
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 08/2024
Responsible Agency City IT
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Flood Forecasting
Project Title/Action 2A1: Work with a wide range of stakeholders to have a river gauge installed
on the Mississippi River
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City/DNR
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Shoreline Stabilization
Project Title/Action 2B1: Work with a wide range of stakeholders to improve shoreline
stabilization on Elm Creek and the Mississippi River
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City/NNR/Watershed
OBJECTIVE: 2C: Wellhead Protection Plan
Project Title/Action 2C1: The wellhead protection plan is updated every 10 years and identifies
potential hazards to the groundwater supply from infiltration of wells that
are not properly capped or protected
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City Engineer
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
41
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Shoreline Stabilization
Project Title/Action 3A1: Work with a wide range of stakeholders to improve shoreline
stabilization on the Mississippi River and repair riverbank erosion
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 3A2: Work with a wide range of stakeholders to improve shoreline
stabilization on the Champlin Mill Pond and repair reservoir erosion
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 3A3: Work with wide range of stakeholders to improve shoreline
stabilization on Elm Creek
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City/NNR/Watershed
OBJECTIVE: 3B: wellhead protection plan
Project Title/Action 3B1: The wellhead protection plan is updated every 10 years and identifies
potential hazards to the groundwater supply from infiltration of wells that
are not properly capped or protected.
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City Engineer
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Wellhead protection plan
Project Title/Action 4A1: Update the wellhead protection plan to identify potential hazards to
the groundwater supply from infiltration of wells that are not properly
capped or protected
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City Engineer
OBJECTIVE: 4B: Flood forecasting
Project Title/Action 4B1: Work with a wide range of stakeholders to install a river gauge
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City/DNR
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Flood forecasting
Project Title/Action 5A1: Work with a wide range of stakeholders to install a river gauge
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City/DNR
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Protection and Safeguarding of vital City data
Project Title/Action 7A1: Improve the data backup and protection protocols for city records
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City IT
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
42
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
43
3.3.5. CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
44
2024 Chanhassen Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Enhance resident awareness.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Partner with local agencies to enhance resident
understanding of local hazards.
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing 1 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Assess flood related hazards within the community. Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing 2 1, 6
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Coordinate with water districts.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Coordinate with regional water districts to assess flood
vulnerability.
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Ensure building code compliance and inspections are conducted on new construction projects.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
45
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Chanhassen 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
No Prior Projects.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
46
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
47
3.3.6. CITY OF CORCORAN
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
48
2024 Corcoran Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Improve storm water drainage capacity
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Identify and improve streets that are repeatedly flooded
and washed away with improvements that include
modifying and raising roads/streets, providing improved
drainage, and storm damage removal.
City $5,000,000.00 10 Years On
Schedule
2 1, 4, 5
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Increase severe weather awareness information for citizens.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Create and distribute severe weather awareness
information for citizens in print and on the internet.
EM $2,000.00 3 years Complete
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Improve Area coverage maps
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Update all City Road and infrastructure maps in digital
and print formats.
City $10,000.00 5 Years On
Schedule
6 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
49
Objective 6A: Improve Outdoor Warning Siren Coverage
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Install an outdoor warning siren in the City’s northeast
industrial district.
EM/City $35,000.00 5 years On
Schedule
4 1, 2
Objective 6B: Improve Outdoor Warning Siren Coverage
6B1 Install an outdoor warning siren in the City’s northwest
region.
EM/City $35,000.00 10 Years On
Schedule
7 1, 2
Objective 6C: Upgrade outdated warning Sirens
6C1 Develop a replacement schedule for all outdoor warning
sirens.
EM Staff Time 1 year Delayed 8 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Locate and develop sites to build a public safety center, fire station(s), and storm shelter.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Conduct a regional study for future public safety
infrastructure including a public safety center (possibly
including a training center), fire station(s), and storm
shelters, including site plan development, in order to
support disaster response.
City $100,000.00 5 Years On
Schedule
1 1, 4
7B1 St. Therese‐ Work with St. Therese to mesh their EOP
with the City’s
EM $5,0000 3 Years On
Schedule
3 1
7C1 Hope Community‐ Work with Hope Community
Development to mesh their EOP with the City’s
EM $5,0000 5 Years On
Schedule
5 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
50
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
51
Corcoran 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Improve storm water drainage capacity
Project Title/Action 1A1: Identify and improve streets that are repeatedly flooded and washed
away with improvements that include modifying and raising roads/streets,
providing improved drainage, and storm damage removal
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Increase severe weather awareness information for citizens
Project Title/Action 2A1: Create and distribute severe weather awareness information for
citizens in print and on the internet
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Improve Area coverage maps
Project Title/Action 5A1: Update all City Road and infrastructure maps in digital and print forms
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City/EM
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Improve Outdoor Warning Siren Coverage
Project Title/Action 6A1: Install an outdoor warning siren in the City’s northeast industrial
district
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City/EM
OBJECTIVE: 6B: Improve Outdoor Warning Siren Coverage
Project Title/Action 6B1: Install an outdoor warning siren in the City’s northwest region
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City/EM
OBJECTIVE: 6C: Upgrade outdated warning Sirens
Project Title/Action 61C: Develop a replacement schedule for all outdoor warning sirens
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EM
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Locate and develop sites to build a public safety center, fire station(s), and storm shelter
Project Title/Action 7A1: Conduct a regional study for future public safety infrastructure
including a public safety center (possibly including a training center), fire
station(s), and storm shelters, including site plan development, to support
disaster response
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency City
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
52
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
53
3.3.7. CITY OF CRYSTAL
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
54
2024 Crystal Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Increase Hail Risk Awareness
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Mail brochures with water bills. City Admin $648.00 Annually Cancelled
1A2 Post warnings at parks and public
buildings
Public
Works/Recreation
$258.00 Spring 2017 Cancelled
1A3 Social Media Public works $240.00/Year Annual Complete
Objective 1B: Lightning: Protect Critical Facilities and Equipment from Lightning.
1B1 Install lightning protection devices Public Works $10,250 Spring 2017 In‐Progress Low 1, 4, 5
1B2 Install surge protection. Public works ‐ In‐Progress Low 1
Objective 1C: Protect Power Lines and Infrastructure from Severe Winds.
1C1 Establish standards for all utilities
regarding tree pruning around lines.
Private Utility
Companies
‐ Annually Ongoing Low 1
1C2 Continue to trim Boulevard trees Streets Division ‐ Annually Ongoing Low 1
Objective 1D: Protect Public Buildings and Infrastructure from Extreme Winter Weather.
1D1 Add insulation to walls and attics Public Works $40,000 Spring 2018 Complete
1D2 Retrofit buildings to withstand snow
loads and prevent roof collapse.
City Engineer Estimates for
each project
needed
Spring 2018 Delayed Low 1, 4, 5
Objective 1E: Extreme Winter Weather
1E1 Identify specific at‐risk populations PD/FD Staff Hours Fall 2017 Delayed Low 1
1E2 Organize outreach programs. PD/FD Staff Hours Fall 2017 Delayed Low 1
Objective 1F: Protect Power Lines from Extreme Winter Weather.
1F1 Bury existing power lines when possible. Public works Depends on
the scope of
the project
Ongoing In‐Progress Low 1, 4, 5
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Extreme Cold: Educate property owners about freezing pipes.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
55
2A1 Educate homeowners and builders on
how to protect their pipes, including
locating water pipes on the inside of the
building insulation or keeping them out
of attics, crawl spaces and outside walls.
Community
Dev/Public Works
$0 Annually
during winter
Ongoing Low 1
2A2 Educate homeowners that letting a
faucet run a pencil width of water during
extreme cold weather can prevent the
buildup of excessive pressure in the pipe
and avoid bursting.
Community Dev/
Public works
0 Annually
during winter
Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2B: Conduct Lightning Awareness Programs
2B1 Post warning signs at parks and public
buildings.
Parks and Rec $2,000 Spring 2018 Cancelled
Objective 2C: Increase Severe Wind Risk Awareness
2C1 Inform residents of shelter locations. Parks and Rec Fall Billing
$500
Spring Billing Cancelled
2C2 Ensure school district is aware of the
best area of refuge in their buildings.
PD/FD Staff Hours Annual Not started Low 1
Objective 2D: Conduct Winter Weather Risk Awareness Actives
2D1 Inform the public about severe winter
weather impacts.
Public Works $0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2E: Conduct Tornado Awareness Activities
2E1 Educate citizens through media outlets. Communications 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2E2 Conduct tornado drills at public
buildings.
Admin 0 Spring
Annually
Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2F: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness.
2F1 Develop and implement a multi‐hazard
public awareness program.
West Metro
Fire/HSEM
Use FEMA
available
material at
no cost.
Minimal Cost
to create
Local specific
material.
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
56
Objective 2G: Perform Home Safety Inspections
2G1 Maintain an in‐home inspection program
promoting fire safety.
FD $8,000 Ongoing Ongoing 1 1
2G2 Install smoke detectors and CO detectors
in homes.
FD $500 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1, 2
Objective 2H: Create a severe weather awareness campaign for citizens that covers sirens information, NOAA Weather Radios, How the
National Weather Service issues warnings and the hazards that affect Hennepin County.
2H1 Distribute info via variety media sources Communications 0 Ongoing Ongoing 2 1
Objective 2I: Educate the community on recreational fires and prohibit open burning
2I1 Make recreational fire regulations
readily available to community.
FD 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2I2 Use local media to increase awareness. FD 0 Spring
Annually
Ongoing Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Continue to use Surface Water Management Plan approved by both the Bassett Creek and Shingle Creek Water Management
Commissions.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Submit development plans for review Community
Dev/Public Works
0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 3B: Monitor Water Supply
3B1 Regularly check for leaks to minimize
water supply losses.
Public Works $10,000 Ongoing Delayed Low 1
3B2 Improve water supply monitoring. Utilities Division. $3,000 Ongoing Cancelled
3B3 Replace/ Upgrade water pipes in
conjunction with utility projects
Public Works Depends on
the project
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Improve Storm Water Management Planning
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Complete storm water drainage study
for known problem areas.
Public Works ‐ Spring 2017 Complete
4A2 Prepare and adopt a storm water
drainage plan and ordinance.
Commercial
Dev/Public Works
‐ Spring 2017 Complete
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
57
4A3 Replace/ Upgrade sewer and storm
system in conjunction with utility
projects
Public Works ‐ Ongoing Ongoing Low 1, 4, 5
Objective 4B: Join or Improve Compliance with National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
4B1 Participating in NFIP Community Dev 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
4B2 Adopt ordinances that meet minimum
Federal and State requirements to
comply with NFIP.
Community Dev 0 Ongoing Complete
Objective 4C: Improve Storm Water Drainage System Capacity
4C1 Increase the capacity of storm drainage
system.
Utilities Varies Ongoing Ongoing 3 1, 4, 5
4C2 Install rain gardens to slow runoff and
improve water quality
Engineering $100,000 Ongoing‐
Seeking
improvement
Complete
4C3 Continue with the established sewer
maintenance program of jetting pipes.
Public Works $10,000 Spring 2016,
Ongoing
Ongoing 3 1
Objective 4D: Reduce Extreme Winter Weather impact to Roadways
4D1 Plan for and maintain adequate road and
debris clearing capabilities.
Public Works ‐ Spring 2017 Ongoing Low 1
Objective 4E: Assess Overall Community Risk, Identify Target Hazards in Community
4E1 Obtain local data, list all properties that
have the potential greatest impact on
community safety. Include public
buildings, private business, places of
gathering, and other locations, maintain
the database
FD ‐ Spring 2016 Delayed Low 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Update local emergency plans as needed and work with neighboring cities on their plan
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Meet with neighboring cities about
emergency plans (each department)
City Managers 0 Summer
2016
Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
58
5A2 Establish Joint EOC West Metro, Both
Cities
$80,000 Project
Began
December
2015
Ongoing Low 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Incorporate Flood Mitigation in Local Planning
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Mitigating hazards during infrastructure
planning.
Commercial Dev Project
Dependent
Fall 2017 Ongoing Low 1, 4, 5
6A2 Obtaining easements for planned and
regulated public use of privately‐owned
land for temporary water retention and
drainage
Commercial Dev ‐ Spring 2018 In‐Progress Low 1
Objective 6B: Adopt and Enforce Building Codes to protect against extreme winter weather
6B1 Adopt International Building Code and
International Residential Code.
Community
Development
0 Ongoing Complete
Objective 6C: Map and Assess Vulnerability to Subsidence
6C1 Use GIS to map areas that are
susceptible to subsidence.
HCEM $0 Spring 2018 Ongoing Low 1
Objective 6D: Ensure building compliance inspections are conducted on new construction projects.
6D1 Review sites On Scheduled basis Community
Development
Inspection
Hours
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
6D2 Update and enforce zoning ordinances Community
Development
Inspection
Hours
Annual Ongoing Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Create evacuation plan for a railroad emergency
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Determine a 1/2mile path on either side
of the rail line.
HCEM 0 March 2016 Complete
7A2 Educate the community on the
evacuation plan.
Multiple $1,000 Winter 2017 Delayed Low 1
Objective 7B: Identify businesses in the community that have hazardous processes and/or materials.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
59
7B1 Pre plan businesses with inspections. FD 0 Spring 2017 Ongoing Low 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8a
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
8A1 Identify underserved communities,
vulnerable populations, and those with
access and functional needs
HCEM/City Staff time Ongoing Low 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9a
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
9A1 Leverage existing and future
infrastructure plans to identify
opportunities for mitigation efforts
Public works Depends on
project
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
9A2 Leverage grant opportunities to expand
mitigation components on existing
programmed projects
Public works Depends on
project
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1, 4
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10a
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
10A1 Connect critical infrastructure to fiber
network for improved communications
and monitoring
Public Works $125,000 Multi‐year Complete
10A2 Continue routine maintenance of critical
infrastructure
Public Works Varies Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
60
Crystal 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Increase Hail Risk Awareness
Project Title/Action 1A1: Mail brochures with water bills
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency City Admin
Project Title/Action 1A2: Post warnings at parks and public buildings
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Public Works
Project Title/Action 1A3: Social media
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public works
OBJECTIVE: 1B: Lightning: Protect Critical Facilities and Equipment from Lightning
Project Title/Action 1B1: Install lightning protection systems
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency Public Works
Project Title/Action 1B2: Install surge protection
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency City of Crystal
OBJECTIVE: 1C: Protect Power Lines and Infrastructure from Severe Winds
Project Title/Action 1C1: Establish standards for all utilities regarding tree pruning around lines
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public Works
Project Title/Action 1C2: Continue to trim Boulevard trees
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public works
OBJECTIVE: 1D: Protect Public Buildings and Infrastructure from Extreme Winter Weather
Project Title/Action 1D1: Add insulation to walls and attics
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public Works
Project Title/Action 1D2: Retrofit buildings to withstand snow loads and prevent roof collapse
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency City Engineer
OBJECTIVE: 1E: Extreme Winter Weather / Assist Vulnerable Populations
Project Title/Action 1E1: Identify specific at‐risk populations
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency PD / FD
Project Title/Action 1E2: Organize outreach programs
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency PD / FD
OBJECTIVE: 1F: Protect Power Lines from Extreme Winter Weather
Project Title/Action 1F1: Bury existing power lines when possible
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Public works
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
61
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Extreme Cold: Educate property owners about freezing pipes
Project Title/Action 2A1: Educate homeowners and builders on how to protect their pipes,
including locating water pipes on the inside of the building insulation or
keeping them out of attics, crawl spaces and outside walls
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Community Development/Public works
Project Title/Action 2A2: Educate homeowners that letting a faucet drip during extreme cold
weather can prevent the buildup of excessive pressure in the pipe and
avoid bursting
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Community Development/Public Works
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Conduct Lightning Awareness Programs
Project Title/Action 2B1: Post warning signs at parks and public buildings
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Public works
OBJECTIVE: 2C: Increase Severe Wind Risk Awareness
Project Title/Action 2C1: Inform residents of shelter locations
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Parks and Rec
Project Title/Action 2C2: Ensure school district is aware of the best area of refuge in their
buildings
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency FD
OBJECTIVE: 2D: Conduct Winter Weather Risk Awareness Activities
Project Title/Action 2D1: Inform the public about severe winter weather impacts
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public works
OBJECTIVE: 2E: Conduct Tornado Awareness Activities
Project Title/Action 2E1: Educate citizens through media outlets
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public works /Administration
Project Title/Action 2E2: Conduct tornado drills at schools and public buildings
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Administration
OBJECTIVE: 2F: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Title/Action 2F1: Develop and implement a multi‐hazard public awareness program
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency West Metro Fire / HSEM
OBJECTIVE: 2G: Perform Home Safety Inspections
Project Title/Action 2G1: Maintain an in‐home inspection promoting fire safety
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency FD
Project Title/Action 2G2: Install smoke detectors and CO detectors in homes
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency FD
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
62
OBJECTIVE: 2H: Create a severe weather awareness campaign for citizens that covers sirens information,
NOAA Weather Radios, How the National Weather Service issues warnings and the hazards that affect
Hennepin County
Project Title/Action 2H1: Distribute info via variety media sources
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public works/ HCEM
OBJECTIVE: 2I: Educate the community on recreational fires and prohibit open burning
Project Title/Action 2I1: Make recreational fire regulations readily available to community
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency FD
Project Title/Action 2I2: Use local media to increase awareness
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency FD/Communications
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Continue to use Surface Water Management Plan approved by both the Bassett Creak and
Shingle Creek Water Management Commissions
Project Title/Action 3A1: Submit development plans for review
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public works
OBJECTIVE: 3B: Monitor Water Supply
Project Title/Action 3B1: Regularly check for leaks to minimize water supply losses
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency Public Works
Project Title/Action 3B2: Improve water supply monitoring
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Utilities Division
Project Title/Action 3B3: Replace/Upgrade water pipes in conjunction with street projects
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public works
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Improve Storm Water Management Planning
Project Title/Action 4A1: Complete storm water drainage study for known problem areas
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public Works
Project Title/Action 4A2: Prepare and adopt a storm water drainage plan and ordinance
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Community Development/Public Works
Project Title/Action 4A3: Replace/Upgrade sewer and storm system in conjunction with street
projects
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public Works
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
63
OBJECTIVE: 4B: Join or Improve Compliance with National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
Project Title/Action 4B1: Participating in NFIP
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Community Development/Public Works
Project Title/Action 4B2: Adopt ordinances that meet minimum Federal and State requirements
to comply with NFIP
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Community Development
OBJECTIVE: 4C: Improve Storm Water Drainage System Capacity
Project Title/Action 4C1: Increase the capacity of storm drainage system
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public Works
Project Title/Action 4C2: Install rain gardens to slow runoff and improve water quality
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public works
Project Title/Action 4C3: Continue with the established sewer maintenance program of jetting
pipes
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public Works
OBJECTIVE: 4D: Reduce Extreme Winter Weather impact to Roadways
Project Title/Action 4D1: Plan for and maintain adequate road and debris clearing capabilities
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public Works
OBJECTIVE: 4E: Assess Overall Community Risk, Identify Target Hazards in Community
Project Title/Action 4E1: Obtain local data, list all properties that have the potential greatest
impact on community safety. Include public buildings, private business,
places of gathering, and other locations, maintain the database
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency FD/Community Development
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Update local emergency plans as needed and work with neighboring cities on their plan
Project Title/Action 5A1: Meet with neighboring cities about emergency plans (each
department)
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City Managers/NSEMPG
Project Title/Action 5A2: Establish joint EOC
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency West Metro FD, Crystal, New Hope
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Incorporate Flood Mitigation in Local Planning
Project Title/Action 6A1: Mitigating hazards during infrastructure planning
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public Works
Project Title/Action 6A2: Obtaining easements for planned and regulated public use of
privately‐owned land for temporary water retention and drainage
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Community Development/Public works
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
64
OBJECTIVE: 6B: Adopt and Enforce Building Codes to protect against extreme winter weather
Project Title/Action 6B1: Adopt International Building Code and International Residential Code
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Community Development
OBJECTIVE: 6C: Map and Assess Vulnerability to Subsidence
Project Title/Action 6C1: Use GIS to map areas that are susceptible to subsidence
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency LOGIS/County
OBJECTIVE: 6D: Ensure building compliance inspections are conducted on new construction projects
Project Title/Action 6D1: Review sites on scheduled basis
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Community Development
Project Title/Action 6D2: Update and enforce zoning ordinances
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Community Development
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Create evacuation plan for a railroad emergency
Project Title/Action 7A1: Determine a ½ mile path on either side of the rail line
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency HCEM
Project Title/Action 7A2: Educate the community on the evacuation plan
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency Multiple
OBJECTIVE: 7B: Identify businesses in the community that have hazardous processes and/or materials
Project Title/Action 7B1: Pre‐Plan businesses with inspections
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency FD
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
65
3.3.8. CITY OF DAYTON
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
66
2024 Dayton Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Improve water system in NW Dayton
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Establish a backup water supply source for system users in
case of well failure
City of
Dayton
$1 Mil Short Delayed Low 1, 4, 5
1A2 Construct water storage to provide fire suppression City of
Dayton
$2 Mil Short Delayed Low 1
1A3 Explore emergency water supply connections to an
adjacent community system.
City of
Dayton
$800,000 Short Delayed Medium 1
Objective 1B: Purchase Property in Flood Zone Area
1B1 Update inundation map every 10 years Wenck
Engineering
$5000 Long Ongoing Low 1
1B2 Review and update policies that discourage growth in
flood‐prone areas
City of
Dayton
$1,000 Medium Ongoing Medium 1
1B3 Educate homeowners in flood zone areas on options that
can be offered to them
City of
Dayton
$1,000 Medium Ongoing Low 1
1B4 Promote the purchase of flood insurance for all residents in
the flood zone
City of
Dayton
$1,000 Medium Ongoing Low 1
1B5 Promote community participation in the National Flood
Insurance Program.
City of
Dayton
$1,000 Medium Ongoing Medium 1
1B6 Maintain sandbags and flood fighting equipment City of
Dayton
$20,000 Long Ongoing Medium 1
Objective 1C: Flood Forecasting
1C1 Work with a wide range of stakeholders to install a river
gauge on the Crow River at the discharge into the
Mississippi.
City of
Dayton
$200,000 Long Ongoing 1 1, 2
Objective 1D: Wild land fire
1D1 Develop and publicize evacuation plans and routes in areas
threatened by wildland fires.
City of
Dayton
$1,000 Medium Ongoing Medium 1
1D2 Enforce burning restrictions City of
Dayton
$1,000 Medium Ongoing Medium 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
67
1D3 Encourage citizens to purchase and use smoke detectors. City of
Dayton
$1,000 Medium Ongoing Medium 1
Objective 1E: Severe Weather/Tornado Response
1E1 Replace the storm shelter with a safe room at the Dayton
Park Properties
City of
Dayton
$353,000 Short Complete
1E2 Encourage residents with slab‐on‐grade homes to install a
safe room during construction
City of
Dayton
$1,000 Long Ongoing Medium 1
1E3 Update Dayton’s warning siren system. City of
Dayton
$150,000 Long Ongoing 3 1
1E4 Upgrade EOC and Equipment for Severe Weather/Tornado
Response.
City of
Dayton
$200,000 Long Ongoing 2 1
1E5 Purchase generators or Install generators at Critical
Infrastructure points in the city.
City of
Dayton
$300,000 Long Ongoing Low 1, 4, 5
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Shoreline/Bank Stabilization
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Work with a wide range of stakeholders to improve
shoreline stabilization on the Mississippi River and repair
riverbank erosion
City of
Dayton
$600,000 Long Ongoing Low 1, 5
3A2 Work with various stakeholders to improve shoreline
stabilization on the Crow River and repair riverbank
erosion.
City of
Dayton
$600,000 Long Ongoing Low 1, 5
3A3 Work with various stakeholders to improve bank
stabilization along Oakview Ln wetlands and repair
culverts.
City of
Dayton
$170,000 Long Complete
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A:
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
68
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Outdoor Warning Siren
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Identify future sites for new sirens in the new
developments
City of
Dayton
$150,000 Long Ongoing Medium 1
Objective 6B: Purchase/Install generators
6B1 Review and Install generators during the construction
process of development
City of
Dayton
$300,000 Long Cancelled
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Bury Power Lines
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work with the community to identify power lines that
could be buried to reduce power failures in heavily
populated areas
City of
Dayton
$450,000 Long Ongoing Medium 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
69
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
70
Dayton 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Improve water system in NW Dayton
Project Title/Action 1A1: Establish backup water supply source for system users in case of well
failure
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 1A2: Construct water storage to provide fire suppression
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 1A3: Explore emergency water supply connection to adjacent community
system
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2028
Responsible Agency City of Dayton
OBJECTIVE: 1B: Purchase Property in Flood Zone Area
Project Title/Action 1B1: Update inundation map every 10 years
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 1B2: Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐prone
areas
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 1B3: Educate homeowners in flood zone areas on options that can be
offered to them
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2028
Project Title/Action 1B4: Promote the purchase of flood insurance for all residents in the flood
zone
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 1B5: Promote community participation in the National Flood Insurance
Program
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2028
Project Title/Action 1B6: Maintain sandbags and flood fighting equipment
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2026
Summary of Project City of Dayton, Dayton Public Works
OBJECTIVE: 1C: Flood Forecasting
Project Title/Action 1C1: Work with a wide range of stakeholders to have a river gauge installed
on the Crow River at the discharge into the Mississippi
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency City of Dayton
OBJECTIVE: 1D: Wild Land Fire
Project Title/Action 1D1: Develop and publicize evacuation plans and routes in areas
threatened by wild land fires
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2027
Project Title/Action 1D2: Enforce burning restrictions
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1D3: Encourage citizens to purchase and use smoke detectors
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City of Dayton
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
71
OBJECTIVE: 1E: Severe Weather/Tornado Response
Project Title/Action 1E1: Replace the storm shelter with a safe room at the Dayton Park
Properties
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1E2: Encourage residents with slab on grade homes to install a safe room
during construction
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2028
Project Title/Action 1E3: Update Dayton’s warning siren system
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2028
Project Title/Action 1E4: Upgrade EOC and Equipment for Severe Weather/Tornado Response
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2028
Project Title/Action 1E5: Purchase generators or install generators at Critical Infrastructure
points in the city
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2025
Responsible Agency City of Dayton, Public Works
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Shoreline/Bank Stabilization
Project Title/Action 3A1: Work with a wide range of stakeholders to improve shoreline
stabilization on the Mississippi River and repair riverbank erosion
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 3A2: Work with a wide range of stakeholders to improve shoreline
stabilization on the Crow River and repair riverbank erosion
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 3A3: Work with a wide range of stakeholders to improve bank stabilization
along Oakview LN wetlands and repair culverts
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City of Dayton
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Outdoor Warning Siren
Project Title/Action 6A1: Identify future sites for new sirens in the new developments
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2027
OBJECTIVE: 6B: Purchase/Install generators
Project Title/Action 6B1: Review and install generators during construction process of
development
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency City of Dayton
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury Power Lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work with the community to identify power lines that could be buried
to reduce power failures in heavily populated areas
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City of Dayton
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
72
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
73
3.3.9. CITY OF DEEPHAVEN
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
74
2024 Deephaven Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A
Action Action Action Action Action Action Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate
hazard mitigation actions.
LE, City Staff 5K Medium Complete
2A2 Provide information to the public on the city website and
through public education opportunities
LE, City Staff 5K Medium In
Progress
3 1
Objective 2B: Promote partnerships between the state, counties, local jurisdictions, and partner agencies to identify, prioritize, and implement
mitigation actions.
2B1 Participate as a member in local or regional hazard
mitigation planning group
LE, City Staff 5K Medium In
Progress
2 1
2B2 Support or provide the public sector events, workshop,
symposium, and continued education opportunities.
LE, City Staff 5K Medium In
Progress
7 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Establish Multi‐Jurisdictional partnership to reduce runoff
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
75
Objective 5A: Continue the promotion of partnerships with federal, state, and local entities to develop successful mitigation plans and
operational strategies. Work towards a common comprehensive emergency operation plan that can be utilized on a larger regional platform.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Continue affording the opportunity for City Staff to attend
or join emergency management associations like Lakes
Area Emergency Management Planning Group, MEMA
(Metropolitan Emergency Managers Association) and
AMEM (Association of Minnesota Emergency Managers).
LE, HCEM,
State and
Local
Affiliates.
20K Long In
Progress
6 1
5A2 Continue participation in multi‐jurisdictional / multi‐
agency tabletop, drill, and full‐scale exercises.
LE, HCEM,
State and
Local
Affiliates.
20K Long In
Progress
1 1
5A3 Research and implement lessons learned from actual
hazardous events from local, regional, and national
jurisdictions to avoid probable mistakes from repeating
themselves.
LE, HCEM,
State and
Local
Affiliates.
20K Long In
Progress
5 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Outdoor Warning Siren
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Bury power lines
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work with the community to identify power lines which
could be buried to reduce power failures.
LE, City Staff,
City Council,
Zoning, Xcel
Energy
500K Long In
Progress
4 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
76
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
77
Deephaven 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions
Project Title/Action 2A1: Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard
mitigation actions
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 12/2026
Project Title/Action 2A2: Provide information to the public on the city website and through
public education opportunities
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency LE, City Staff
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Promote partnerships between the state, counties, local jurisdictions, and partner agencies to
identify, prioritize, and implement mitigation actions
Project Title/Action 2B1: Participate as a member in local or regional hazard mitigation
planning group
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 2B2: Support or provide the public sector events, workshop, symposium,
and continued education opportunities
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency LE, City Staff
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Continue the promotion of partnerships with federal, state, and local entities to develop
successful mitigation plans and operational strategies. Work towards a common comprehensive emergency
operation plan that can be utilized on a larger regional platform
Project Title/Action 5A1: Continue affording the opportunity for City Staff to attend or join
emergency management associations like Lakes Area Emergency
Management Planning Group, MEMA and AMEM.
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 5A2: Continue participation in multi‐jurisdictional / multi‐agency tabletop,
drill, and full‐scale exercises
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 5A3: Research and implement lessons learned from actual hazardous
events from local, regional, and national jurisdictions to avoid probable
mistakes from repeating themselves
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency LE, HCEM, State and Local Affiliates
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury Power Lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work with the community to identify power lines which could be
buried to reduce power failures
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency LE, City Staff, City Council, Zoning, Xcel Energy
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
78
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
79
3.3.10. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
80
2024 Eden Prairie Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Identify potential hazards with other city state and Federal groups
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Incorporate mitigation strategies in EOP EPFD 0 Ongoing Ongoing 1 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Develop new programs, collaterals and talking points to use at specific public events
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Use the following areas to increase our
touch points: Open House, Web Page,
National Night Out,
School Program
EPFD 500 Sept 2024 In Progress Medium 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Work with other city resources for identification
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Incorporate in Emergency Operations Plan EPFD $5,000 Sep 2024 In Progress Medium 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Gather information on potential impacted areas
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Incorporate in Emergency Operations Plan EPFD 0 Ongoing Ongoing Medium 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Coordination with other agencies
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Joint Operations exercises EPFD $1,000 Jan 2024 In Progress Medium 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
81
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: CERT and CSU Team Growth and Capabilities
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Recruitment of new members EPFD $2,500 Ongoing In Progress Medium 1, 2
7A2 Monthly Training in house/with other CERT
groups
EPFD $2,500 Ongoing In Progress Medium 1, 2
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A Work with Community Development to identify specific target areas
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
8A1 Leverage Race Equity Action Team (REAT) to
reach specific community groups.
EPFD 500 Sept 2024 In Progress Medium 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A Explore alternative fuel options for Daily operational needs
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
9A1 Reduce use of fossil fuel resources and
migrate to EV Alternates
EPFD 75,000 Ongoing In Progress 3 1
9A2 Incorporate battery equipment into
Emergency Responses (Lights, saw, other
light equipment
EPFD 20,000 Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A Identify Community resources in this area
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
10A1 Review capabilities and enhance resiliency of
resources
EPFD $500 Sept 2024 In Progress Medium 1
Objective 10B Identify public works projects to reduce impact from natural hazards
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
82
10B1 Dell Road from Crestwood Terrace to CSAH
61. Replace a gravel rural road with a
bituminous section road, includes a
stormwater management system and a new
concrete culvert crossing of Riley Creek.
EP Public
Works
$7.9M 2026‐27 Planning Medium 1, 4, 5
10B2 Purgatory Creek at Rainbow Drive Replace
old failed corrugated metal pipe that carries
Purgatory Creek under Rainbow Drive.
EP Public
Works
$250,000 2024 Scheduled Medium 1, 4, 5
10B3 Welters way west of Abbott court. Lining of
failed critical storm pipe.
EP Public
Works
$175,000 2024 Scheduled 2 1, 4, 5
10B4 EP Center Mall Installation of stormwater
storage facility to reduce flood risk in flood
prone area.
EP Public
Works
$1,000,000 2024‐2025 Planning Medium 1, 5
10B5 Lake Smetana Modify outlet structure from
lake to reduce downstream flood risk.
EP Public
Works
$200,000 2024 Scheduled Medium 1, 5
10B6 Valley View Road NW of Round Lake Reduce
flood risk of Valley View Rd. by making
stormwater storage and piping
improvements.
EP Public
Works
$250,000 2025 Planning Medium 1, 4, 5
10B7 Mitchell Rd. / Blakeney Rd. reduce flood risk
with stormwater piping improvements.
EP Public
Works
$350,000 2025 Planning Medium 1, 4, 5
10B7 Richard T Anderson conservation area.
Retaining wall installation and slope
stabilization to reduce steep slope failure.
EP Public
Works
$350,000 2024 Scheduled Medium 1, 5
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
83
Eden Prairie 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Identify potential hazards with other city, state, and federal groups
Project Title/Action 1A1: Incorporate mitigation strategies in EOP
Project Status Anticipated completion date: Sept 2023
Responsible Agency EPFD
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Develop new programs, collaterals, and talking points to use at specific public events
Project Title/Action 2A1: Use the following areas to increase our touch points: Open House,
Web Page, National Night Out, School Program
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EPFD
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Work with other city resources for identification
Project Title/Action 3A1: Incorporate in Emergency Operations Plan
Project Status Anticipated completion date: Sept 2024
Responsible Agency EPFD
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Gather information on potential impacted areas
Project Title/Action 4A1: Incorporate in Emergency Operations Plan
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency EPFD
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Coordination with other agencies
Project Title/Action 5A1: Joint Operations exercises
Project Status Anticipated completion date: Sept 2024
Responsible Agency EPFD
OBJECTIVE: 7A: CERT and CSU Team Growth and Capabilities
Project Title/Action 7A1: Recruitment of new members
Project Status Anticipated completion date: Sept 2024
Project Title/Action 7A2: Monthly Training in house/with other CERT groups
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EPFD
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
84
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
85
3.3.11. CITY OF EDINA
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
86
2024 Edina Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Review/update local emergency operations plan
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Twice a year review EOP to ensure all positions
are updated with correct personnel and contact
numbers.
Fire 0 Biannual Ongoing 1 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Prepare position aids (job descriptions) for key EOC personnel
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Develop laminated JD for each of the key
positions in the CFLOP organizational structure.
These will be available for EOC personnel to
reference during training or actual events.
Fire 200 2017 Complete
Objective 2B: Conduct in‐house IS 100 and 200 training for EOC personnel
2B1 Provide another option for staff to obtain the
necessary FEMA/DHS minimum training
through classroom session.
Fire 100 2025 Ongoing 2 1
Objective 2C: Provide IS 300 training for key EOC personnel
2C1 Identify key personnel to advance to IS 300
training. Bring in a training organization to
provide training
TBD 2500 2024 In Progress Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Review/update FEMA and local watershed flood maps
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Work with Engineering Department to ensure
updated maps are readily available. Have
printed copies in EOC storage room. Review
electronic access to records and history
Engineer 1000 2024 In progress Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
87
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Prepare and have on hand in the EOC key City maps and essential ICS wall charts and forms
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Work with local All Hazards Incident
Management Team to develop similar wall
posters for our EOC.
Fire 300 2024 In progress Medium 1
Objective 5B: Set up a pager group within our city CAD system for all primary and alternate EOC personnel and conduct test pages quarterly.
5B1 Work with our Communications Center to put
together a text message pager group for EOC
personnel and conduct quarterly test pages.
Dispatch 0 2025 In Progress Low 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Incorporate Heritage Resources Disaster Management Planning report from Preservation Planning Consultant as reference to
the City EOP
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Obtain report from Heritage Preservation
Consultant to have as a reference to the EOP.
The report outlines the important disaster
management practices recommended by the
consultant.
Planning 0 2024 In progress Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Develop city damage assessment plan (DAP)
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Prepare written DAP that outlines key
personnel and their responsibilities. Send draft
document out to all entities listed in the plan to
gain their feedback before final plan. Provide
training to all key personnel and evaluate and
adjust plan accordingly.
Fire 500 2025 In progress Low 1
Objective 7B: Conduct one Technology EOC activation and one Full EOC activation annually.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
88
7B1 Technology activation brings in our IT
Department to setup all the computers and
phones and update any necessary software. The
Full EOC activation will bring primary and
alternate EOC personnel together.
IT/Fire 0 Annual Ongoing 4 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
8A1 Identify communication methods that best
serve populations in regard to EM events that
impact residents
Fire/
Communications
500 2024 In Progress 5 1
8A2 Create alternative response unit to provide
access to critical emergency and non‐
emergency needs to connect residents with
service connecting public safety through public
health
Fire/ Public
Health
400,000 2024 In Progress 3 1
8A3 Review and implement strategies from the Bike
and Pedestrian plan to better improve safety
and travel for non‐vehicle traffic. Improving
access for all populations across roadways and
other difficult to access areas of the community.
Engineering 1,000,000 2027 Ongoing Low 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
9A1 Conversion to renewable energy fleet EV
alternatives
Sustainability 75000 Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
89
10A1 Review current critical infrastructure needs to
ensure reliability in natural hazards.
Fire 1000 2025 In Progress 6 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
90
Edina 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Review/Update local emergency operations plan
Project Title/Action 1A1: Twice a year review EOP to ensure all positions are updated with
correct personnel and contact numbers
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Fire
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Prepare position aids (job descriptions) for key EOC personnel
Project Title/Action 2A1: Develop laminated JD for each of the key positions in the CFLOP
organizational structure. These will be available for EOC personnel to
reference during training or actual events
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Fire
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Conduct in‐house IS 100 and 200 training for EOC personnel
Project Title/Action 2B1: Provide another option for staff to obtain the necessary FEMA/DHS
minimum training through classroom session
Project Status Anticipated completion date: Q2 2025
Responsible Agency Fire
OBJECTIVE: 2C: Provide IS 300 training for key EOC personnel
Project Title/Action 2C1: Identify key personnel to advance to IS 300 training. Bring in a training
organization to provide training
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Edina
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Review/Update FEMA and local watershed flood maps
Project Title/Action 4A1: Work with engineering department to ensure updated maps are
readily available. Have printed copies in EOC storage room
Project Status Anticipated completion date: Q4 2024
Responsible Agency Engineer
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Prepare and have on hand in the EOC key City maps and essential ICS wall charts and forms
Project Title/Action 5A1: Work with local All Hazards Incident Management Team to develop
similar wall posters for our EOC
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Fire
OBJECTIVE: 5B: Set up a pager group within our city CAD system for all primary and alternate EOC personnel
and conduct test pages quarterly
Project Title/Action 5B1: Work without Communications Center to put together a text message
pager group for EOC personnel and conduct quarterly test pages
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Dispatch
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Incorporate Heritage Resources Disaster Management Planning report from Preservation
Planning Consultant as reference to the city EOP
Project Title/Action 6A1: Obtain report from Heritage Preservation Consultant to have as a
reference to the EOP. The report outlines the important disaster
management practices recommended by the consultant
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency Planning
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
91
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Develop city damage assessment plan (DAP)
Project Title/Action 7A1: Prepare written DAP that outlines key personnel and their
responsibilities. Send draft document out to all entities listed in the plan to
gain their feedback before final plan. Provide training to all key personnel
and evaluate and adjust plan accordingly
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Fire
OBJECTIVE: 7B: Conduct one Technology EOC activation and one Full EOC activation annually
Project Title/Action 7B1: Technology activation brings in our IT Department to setup all the
computers and phones and update any necessary software. The Full EOC
activation will bring primary and alternate EOC personnel together
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency IT/Fire
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
92
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
93
3.3.12. CITY OF EXCELSIOR
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
94
2024 Excelsior Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Achieve certification in the National Weather Service Storm Ready Program
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Achieve certification in the National Weather Service Storm
Ready Program
SLMPD Staff Time 1‐2yrs Ongoing 1 1
Objective 2B: Improve citizens understanding of available communications for notification of severe weather warnings
2B1 Host annual severe weather awareness courses. SLMPD Staff Time 3‐5yrs Ongoing 2 1
2B2 Host annual SkyWarn course for local citizens and first
responders.
SLMPD Staff Time 3‐5yrs Ongoing 3 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Reducing Phosphorus in Crystal Lake
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
95
Objective 6A: Ensure building code compliance and inspections are conducted on new construction projects.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Design and implement checklists with timelines for all new
building projects.
Planning Staff Time 3‐5yrs Ongoing Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
96
Excelsior 2018‐2024 Mitigation Project Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Achieve certification in the National Weather Service Storm Ready Program
Project Title/Action 2A1: Achieve certification in the National Weather Service Storm Ready
Program
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency SLMPD
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Improve citizens understanding of available communications for notification of severe
weather warnings
Project Title/Action 2B1: Host annual severe weather awareness courses
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 2B2: Host annual SkyWarn course for local citizens and first responders
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency SLMPD
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Ensure building code compliance and inspections are conducted on new construction
projects
Project Title/Action 6A1: Design and implement checklists with timelines for all new building
projects
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency Planning
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
97
3.3.13. FORT SNELLING
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
98
2024 Fort Snelling Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Build up physical flood control measures
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Construct flood control walls and berms. Fort Snelling $1 Million 6 Months Not
Started
1 1, 5
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Enhance awareness of flooding hazards.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Conduct flood vulnerability assessment. Fort Snelling Personnel
Time
3 Months Not
Started
2 1, 6
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A:Enhance awareness of landslide hazards.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Conduct landslide vulnerability assessment. Fort Snelling Personnel
Time
3 Months Not
Started
3 1, 5
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Ensure building code compliance and inspections are conducted on new construction projects.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
99
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Fort Snelling 2018‐2024 Mitigation Project Progress Report
No Prior Projects.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
100
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
101
3.3.14. CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
102
2024 Golden Valley Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Enhance resident awareness.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Partner with local agencies to enhance resident
understanding of local hazards.
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing 1 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Assess flood related hazards within the community. Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing 2 1, 6
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Coordinate with water districts.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Coordinate with regional water districts to assess flood
vulnerability.
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Ensure building code compliance and inspections are conducted on new construction projects.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
103
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Golden Valley 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
No Prior Projects.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
104
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
105
3.3.15. CITY OF GREENFIELD
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
106
2024 Greenfield Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural and man‐made hazards
Objective 1A: Drainage/Culvert Improvements: Develop a repair/replacement plan for ditching and culvert replacement
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Implement storm water management plan City of
Greenfield
15K/Year Complete Complete
1A2 Implement capital improvement program projects
intended to reduce flood potential
City of
Greenfield
15K/Year Ongoing Ongoing 1 1
Goal 2: Increase education, outreach, and awareness
Objective 2A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation action
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Provide information to the public on the city website and
other opportunities.
City of
Greenfield
Staff Time Complete Complete
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Promote storm water management
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Adopt and implement storm water utility plan for future
water quality.
City of
Greenfield
Staff Time Complete Complete
Objective 3B: Reduce phosphorous levels of Lake Sarah
3B1 Apply for grants from BWSR and Hennepin County to fund
products that will reduce phosphorous levels coming from
the Dance Hall Creek Sub‐watershed for water quality
City of
Greenfield,
financial
partners,
Watershed
5K Grants Ongoing Ongoing 2 1
3B2 Work with Pioneer‐Sarah Creek Watershed to identify and
carry out projects to reduce TMDL levels
Greenfield/
Watershed
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Assess areas that are predisposed to natural disasters or manmade hazards that could be responsible for financial and/or
personal impact.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
107
4A1 Review areas of impact with staff – secure portable
generator for Water Plant
City of
Greenfield
50K Complete Complete
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Continue to meet State and Federal regulations with the
plan
City of
Greenfield
Staff Time Complete Complete
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development
Objective 6A: Complete City coverage with outdoor warning sirens
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Install the remaining four sirens at the sites that have
been identified
City of
Greenfield
90K Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
108
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
109
Greenfield 2018‐2024 Mitigation Project Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Flooding – Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and
losses due to flooding
Project Title/Action 1A1: Implement storm water management plan
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Greenfield Public Works
Project Title/Action 1A2: Implement capital improvement program projects intended to reduce
flood potential
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Greenfield Public Works
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation action
Project Title/Action 2A1: Provide information to the public on the city website and other
opportunities
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City of Greenfield
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Promote storm water management
Project Title/Action 3A1: Adopt and implement storm water utility plan for future water quality
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City of Greenfield
OBJECTIVE: 3B: Reduce phosphorous levels of Lake Sarah
Project Title/Action 3B1: Apply for grants from BWSR and Hennepin County to fund products
that will reduce phosphorous levels coming from the Dance Hall Creek Sub‐
watershed for water quality
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City of Greenfield
Project Title/Action 3B2: Work with Pioneer‐Sarah Creek Watershed to identify and carry out
projects to reduce TMDL levels
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City of Greenfield
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Assess areas that are predisposed to natural disasters or manmade hazards that could be
responsible for financial and/or personal impact
Project Title/Action 4A1: Review areas of impact with staff – secure portable generator for
Water Plant
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City of Greenfield
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Project Title/Action 5A1: Continue to meet State and Federal regulations with the plan
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City of Greenfield
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Complete City coverage with outdoor warning sirens
Project Title/Action 6A1: Install the remaining four sirens at the sites that have been identified
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City of Greenfield
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
110
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
111
3.3.16. CITY OF GREENWOOD
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
112
2024 Greenwood Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Improve citizens understanding of available communications for notification of severe weather warnings.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Host annual severe weather awareness courses. SLMPD Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
2A2 Host annual SkyWarn course for local citizens and first
responders.
SLMPD Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 4 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Upgrade storm water infrastructure
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
113
6A1 Identify storm water problem areas and incorporate
improvements into capital plan.
Public
Works
$30,000 5 Years Ongoing 1 1
Objective 6B: Encourage new or existing power lines to be buried for the reduction of future power outages
6B1 Include language in building code recommending buried power
lines.
Zoning Staff Time 2016 Ongoing 2 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
114
Greenwood 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
Under Revision by the Jurisdiction
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Improve citizens understanding of available communications for notification of severe
weather warnings.
Project Title/Action Host annual severe weather awareness courses.
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Greenwood
Project Title/Action Host annual SkyWarn course for local citizens and first responders.
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Greenwood
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Complete City coverage with outdoor warning sirens
Project Title/Action Identify storm water problem areas and incorporate improvements into
capital plan.
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Greenwood
Project Title/Action Include language in building code recommending buried power lines.
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Greenwood
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
115
3.3.17. CITY OF HANOVER
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
116
2024 Hanover Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Enhance resident awareness.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Partner with local agencies to enhance resident
understanding of local hazards.
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing 1 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Assess flood related hazards within the community. Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing 2 1, 6
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Coordinate with water districts.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Coordinate with regional water districts to assess flood
vulnerability.
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Ensure building code compliance and inspections are conducted on new construction projects.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
117
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Hanover 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
No Prior Projects.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
118
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
119
3.3.18. CITY OF HOPKINS
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
120
2024 Hopkins Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Flooding‐ Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to flooding.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Update inundation map every 10 years PW/GIS/EM 10K 3‐5yrs Ongoing Low 1
1A2 Review and compare existing flood control
standards, zoning, and building requirements
EM/City Planner 600 1‐2yrs Complete
1A3 Review and update policies that discourage
growth in flood‐prone areas
City/Watershed 450 2‐3yrs Complete
1A4 Review and update city wide evacuation plan LE/Fire/EM 450 2‐3yrs Complete
1A5 Periodically exercise flood response actions EM Exercise
team
5K 3‐5yrs Ongoing Low 1
1A6 Update flooding response actions in Regional
Emergency Operations Plan
EM/Plans Team 300 3‐5yrs Ongoing 1 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Publicize and encourage the adoption of
appropriate hazard mitigation actions.
EM/PD/FD 1.2K 1‐2yrs Complete
2A2 Provide information to the public on the city
website and through public education
opportunities.
EM 2.5k 1‐4yrs Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2B: Promote partnerships between the state, counties, local jurisdictions, and partner agencies to identify, prioritize, and
implement mitigation actions.
2B1 Participate as a member in local or regional
hazard mitigation planning group
Fire/EM 0 2‐3yrs Ongoing 2 1
2B2 Support or provide the public sector events,
workshop, symposium, and continued
education opportunities.
EM 0 2‐3yrs Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2C: Work with Civic groups, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in local community.
2C1 Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard
mitigation principles and practices
EM 2.5K 1‐4yrs Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
121
2C2 Encourage businesses to develop and
implement hazard mitigation actions
EM 2.5K 1‐4yrs Ongoing Low 1
2C3 Support or provide the private sector events,
workshop, symposium, and continued
education opportunities.
EM 2.5K 1‐4yrs Ongoing Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Prevent from building and encroaching on natural resources without effecting other cultural
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Work with Ed and Cultural groups to preserve
resources
EM/PW/Ed 450 3‐5yrs Ongoing Low 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Assess areas of the city for the impacts of natural disaster.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Partnering with PW, assess areas of city that
may be vulnerable to disasters.
EM 500 2‐3yrs Ongoing Low 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Work with state, county, and local officials to enhance mitigation strategies.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Meet with officials to see how we can
mitigate potential mitigation issues
EM/Ed 500 3‐5yrs Ongoing Low 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Work with City Departments to make sure that future development is disaster resistance.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Promote disaster resistance Buildings EM 500 3‐5yrs Ongoing Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Work to make city less vulnerable to disasters
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
122
7A1 Work with new contractors and developers to
build strong and less vulnerable.
EM/ED/PW 100 Annually Ongoing Low 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
Work with underserved community members in how to prepare
for emergencies and disasters; provide them with Resources and
information in their langue.
EM/PR 1000 2‐4Yrs Ongoing 3 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
Work with city, county and state governments on climate
change issues and provide resources to residents and
businesses in the City of Hopkins.
All City
Departments
Undetermined 1‐5Yrs Ongoing Low 1
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
Continue to work with Public works to assure that all
of the city infrastructures will protect and hold up in
natural or manmade hazards
EM/ PW Undetermined 1‐ 5yrs Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
123
Hopkins 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Flooding – Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and
losses due to flooding
Project Title/Action 1A1: Update the inundation map every 10 years
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency PW/GIS/EM
Project Title/Action 1A2: Review and compare existing flood control standards, zoning, and
building requirements
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM/City Planner
Project Title/Action 1A3: Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐prone areas
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City/Watershed
Project Title/Action 1A4: Review and update city wide evacuation plan
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 1‐2024
Responsible Agency LE/Fire/EM
Project Title/Action 1A5: Periodically exercise flood response actions
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 1‐2024
Responsible Agency EM Exercise team
Project Title/Action 1A6: Update flooding response actions in Regional Emergency Operations
Plan
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM/Plans Team
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions
Project Title/Action 2A1: Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard mitigation
actions
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM/PD/FD
Project Title/Action 2A2: Provide information to the public on the city website and through
public education opportunities
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Promote partnerships between the state, counties, local jurisdictions, and partner agencies to
identify, prioritize, and implement mitigation actions
Project Title/Action 2B1: Participate as a member in local or regional hazard mitigation
planning group
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Fire/EM
Project Title/Action 2B2: Support or provide the public sector events, workshop, symposium,
and continued education opportunities
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
124
OBJECTIVE: 2C: Work with Civic groups, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in
local community
Project Title/Action 2C1: Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles
and practices
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM
Project Title/Action 2C2: Encourage businesses to develop and implement hazard mitigation
actions
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM
Project Title/Action 2C3: Support or provide the private sector events, workshop, symposium,
and continued education opportunities
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Prevent from building and encroaching on natural resources with affecting other cultural
Project Title/Action 3A1: Work with Ed and Cultural groups to preserve resources
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 6‐2024
Responsible Agency EM/PW/Ed
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Assess areas of the city for the impacts of natural disaster
Project Title/Action 4A1: Partnering with PW, assess areas of city that may be vulnerable to
disasters
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Work with state, county, and local officials to enhance mitigation strategies
Project Title/Action 5A1: Meet with officials to see how we can mitigate potential mitigation
issues
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 8‐2024
Responsible Agency EM/Ed
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Work with City Departments to make sure that future development is disaster resistant
Project Title/Action 6A1: Promote disaster resistant buildings
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Work to make city less vulnerable to disasters
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work with new contractors and developers to build strong and less
vulnerable.
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM, ED, PW
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
125
3.3.19. CITY OF INDEPENDENCE
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
126
2024 Independence Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Flooding: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to flooding.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Review and compare existing flood control standards,
zoning, and building requirements. Review and develop
engineering plans with new street improvements, storm
sewer runoff design, and INI improvements
Public Works,
Engineers,
and water
shed districts.
$10,000 5 years Ongoing 1 1
1A2 Review and update policies that discourage growth in
flood‐prone areas
Public Works,
Engineers,
and water
shed districts.
$10,000 5 years Ongoing 2 1
Objective 1B: Gas Line Protection: Develop a comprehensive approach with gas line companies to reduce the possibility of damage to gas line
in City of Independence.
1B1 Develop emergency management plans with gas
companies to protect the underground and above
ground gas lines/values.
Public Works,
Engineers,
and water
shed districts.
$10,000 5 years Ongoing Low 1
Objective 1C: Main transmission electrical lines through Independence.
1C1 Identify the different main transmission lines through
Independence between Xcel Energy, Great River Energy
and Wright Hennepin
Public Works,
Engineers,
and water
shed districts.
$10,000 5 years Complete
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Invest in a comprehensive emergency notification system to immediately notify all citizens of an emergency, the action plan, and
response to the emergency.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Work with Independence to purchase Code Red or Ever
bridge notification system for our residents.
City Staff $5,000 1 Year Complete
Objective 2B: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions.
2B1 Provide information to the public on the city website
and through public education opportunities
City Staff.
West
Staff Time 1 Year Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
127
Hennepin
Police
Objective 2C: Work with citizens, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in local community.
2C1 Encourage businesses to develop and implement hazard
mitigation actions.
City Staff.
West
Hennepin
Police
Staff Time 1 Year Ongoing Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Reduction of waste and runoff into our lakes, streams, and watersheds.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Work with our local watershed districts to make
improvements to protect our lakes and streams for
water quality.
City
engineers,
watershed
districts,
Public Works
$10,000
annually
3‐5 years Ongoing 3 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Overhead power lines within the city.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Work with Excel Energy to remove and install
underground power on future development projects.
City Engineer,
Staff, Xcel
Energy.
>$1,000,000 10‐20
years
Ongoing Low 1
Objective 4B: West Hennepin Police Department
4B1 Security Protection, building upgrades, backup generator
installed
City and West
Hennepin
Police,
Wright
Hennepin.
$10,000 2 years Complete
Objective 4C: Highway 12 Corridor Improvements
4C1 Complete redesign of Highway 12 through
Independence
City and West
Hennepin
Police,
>$1,000,000 5‐20
years
In‐
Progress
Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
128
Wright
Hennepin.
Objective 4D: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
4D1 Identify and train staff on emergency response to a
railroad disaster on the railroad. Develop an emergency
response evacuation plan, educate citizens and train on
it.
City and West
Hennepin
Police,
Wright
Hennepin.
$10,000 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 4E: Lake Sarah and Lake Independence, local parks, and Lake Rebecca.
4E1 Installation of outdoor warning sirens to cover the Lake
Sarah, Lake Independence, Rebecca Park, and all local
parks within Independence.
City and West
Hennepin
Police,
Wright
Hennepin.
TBD 3 years Ongoing Low 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Continue to meet the state and Federal regulations with
the protection plan.
City Staff,
Public Works
Staff time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Outdoor Warning Sirens
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Identify future sites for new sirens if new development
and future group occurs.
City Staff and
Public Works,
West
Hennepin
Police
Staff time
siren install
$40,000
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 6B: In ground electrical lines.
6B1 Work with city engineers to promote and require all new
development to includes in ground power lines vs.
overhead power lines
City Staff and
Public Works,
West
Staff Time,
developer
costs.
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
129
Hennepin
Police
Objective 6C: Backup generators for sewer lift stations.
6C1 All future and current sewer lift stations must require a
backup generator to operate the system.
City Staff and
Public Works,
West
Hennepin
Police.
Staff Time,
developer
costs.
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Bury all power lines.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work with the community and Excel to identify power
lines that could be buried to reduce power failures in
Independence.
City planner,
engineer, city
staff.
Staff time
>$1,000,000
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1, 4, 5
Objective 7B: Trim back all trees/brush around Xcel Energy power lines to require road right of way setbacks
7B1 City and County Public Works and Excel energy remove
trees causing hazard to our power lines.
Public Works,
Xcel Energy
and other
power
companies
$50,000
Staff time
3‐5 years Complete
Objective 7C: Backup generator installed for West Hennepin Public Safety Department.
7C1 Install backup generator to operate West Hennepin
Police Department.
City $40,000 1 Year Completed
Objective 7D: Backup generators for sewer lift stations.
7D1 All future and current sewer lift stations must require a
backup generator to operate the system.
City 400,000 5‐10
years
Ongoing Low 1, 4
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A: Ensure vulnerable populations are adequately protected from the impacts of extreme temperatures
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
8A1 Create a database to track those individuals at high risk
of death, such as elderly, homeless, etc.
City/West
Hennepin EM
Staff time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
130
Objective 9A Reduce impacts of localized street flooding
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
9A1 Evaluate opportunities for County Road 92 ‐Crow River
flooding impacts and Townline Road
City Public
Works
5.0 million Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
10A1 Working with Lakes area Emergency Management
Groups on tabletops fall of 2024, towards a drill and
then functional exercise in 2024 and a full‐scale exercise
in 2025
West
Hennepin EM
7,000 2026 Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
131
Independence 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Flooding: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses
due to flooding
Project Title/Action 1A1: Review and compare existing flood control standards, zoning, and
building requirements. Review and develop engineering plans with new
street improvements, storm sewer runoff design, and INI improvements.
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 1A2: Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐prone
areas.
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Public Works, Engineers, and water shed districts.
OBJECTIVE: 1B: Gas Line Protection: Develop a comprehensive approach with gas line companies to reduce
the possibility of damage to gas line in City of Independence
Project Title/Action 1B1: Develop emergency management plans with gas companies to protect
the underground and above ground gas lines/values.
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency West Hennepin EM, Public Works, Engineers, and water shed districts.
OBJECTIVE: 1C: Main transmission electrical lines through Independence
Project Title/Action 1C1: Identify the different main transmission lines through independence
between Xcel Energy, Great River Energy and Wright Hennepin.
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public Works, Engineers, and water shed districts.
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Invest in a comprehensive emergency notification system to immediately notify all citizens of
an emergency, the action plan, and response to the emergency
Project Title/Action 2A1: Work with Independence to purchase Code Red of Everbridge
notification system for our residents.
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City Staff
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions
Project Title/Action 2B1: Provide information to the public on the city website and through
public education opportunities.
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City Staff. West Hennepin Police
OBJECTIVE: 2C: Work with citizens, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in local
community
Project Title/Action 2C1: Encourage businesses to develop and implement hazard mitigation
actions
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City Staff. West Hennepin Police
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Reduction of waste and runoff into our lakes, streams, and watersheds
Project Title/Action 3A1: Work with our local watershed districts to make improvements to
protect our lakes and streams for water quality
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City engineers, watershed districts, Public Works
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
132
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Overhead power lines within the city
Project Title/Action 4A1: Work with Xcel Energy to remove and install underground power on
future development projects
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City Engineer, Staff, Xcel Energy
OBJECTIVE: 4B: West Hennepin Police Department
Project Title/Action 4B1: Security Protection, building upgrades, backup generator installed
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City and West Hennepin Police, Wright Hennepin.
OBJECTIVE: 4C: Highway 12 Corridor Improvements
Project Title/Action 4C1: Complete redesign of Highway 12 through Independence
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City and West Hennepin Police, Wright Hennepin.
OBJECTIVE: 4D: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
Project Title/Action 4D1: Identify and train staff on emergency response to a railroad disaster
on the railroad. Develop an emergency response evacuation plan, educate
citizens and train on it.
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City and West Hennepin Police, Wright Hennepin.
OBJECTIVE: 4E: Lake Sarah and Lake Independence, local parks, and Lake Rebecca
Project Title/Action 4E1: Installation of outdoor warning sirens to cover the Lake Sarah, Lake
Independence, Rebecca Park, and all local parks within Independence
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency City and West Hennepin Police, Wright Hennepin.
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Project Title/Action 5A1: Continue to meet the state and Federal regulations with the
protection plan
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City Staff, Public Works
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Outdoor Warning Sirens
Project Title/Action 6A1: Identify future sites for new sirens if new development and future
group occurs
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City Staff and Public Works, West Hennepin Police.
OBJECTIVE: 6B: In‐Ground Electrical Lines
Project Title/Action 6B1: Work with city engineers to promote and require all new
development to includes in ground power lines vs. overhead power lines
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City Staff and Public Works, West Hennepin Police.
OBJECTIVE: 6C: Backup generators for sewer lift stations
Project Title/Action 6C1: All future and current sewer lift stations must require a backup
generator to operate the system
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City Staff and Public Works, West Hennepin Police.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
133
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury all power lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work with the community and Xcel to identify power lines that could
be buried to reduce power failures in Independence
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City planner, engineer, city staff.
OBJECTIVE: 7B: Trim back all trees/brush around Xcel Energy power lines to require road right of way setbacks
Project Title/Action 7B1: City and County Public Works and Xcel Energy remove trees causing
hazard to our power lines
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Public Works, Xcel Energy, and other power companies
OBJECTIVE: 7C: Backup generator installed for West Hennepin Public Safety Department
Project Title/Action 7C1: Install backup generator to operate West Hennepin Police
Department
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City
OBJECTIVE: 7D: Backup generators for sewer lift stations
Project Title/Action 7D1: All future and current sewer lift stations must require a backup
generator to operate the system
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Public Works
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
134
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
135
3.3.20. CITY OF LONG LAKE
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
136
2024 Long Lake Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Improve Community Notification Capabilities
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Review available products and vendors offering
notification systems
EM Director unknown 2 years On
Schedule
Low 1
1A2 Implement “Next Door” program for neighborhood
specific notifications
EM Director Staff
Time
2 years Cancelled
1A3 Prepare Community Presentation on emergency
response/notification.
EM Director Staff
Time
2 years Priority 2 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Achieve certification in National Weather Service StormReady program
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Meet requirements of the program EM Director Training
Time
2 years Delayed 1 1
2A2 Prepare Community Presentation on severe weather
awareness.
EM Director 1K 2 years Delayed 3 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A:
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Ensure water runoff choke points have adequate infrastructure to withstand flood.
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Inventory critical choke points and inspect and/or
improve infrastructure.
EM Director
EM Coord
unknown 2 years On
Schedule
4 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A:
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
137
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A:
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Bury Power Lines
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work with the community to identify power lines
that could be buried to reduce power failures in
heavily populated areas
EM Director
EM Coord
Staff
Time
Ongoing On
Schedule
5 1, 4, 5
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
138
Long Lake 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Improve Community Notification Capabilities
Project Title/Action 1A1: Review available products and vendors offering notification systems
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2026
Project Title/Action 1A2: Implement “Next Door” program for neighborhood specific
notifications
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1A3: Prepare Community Presentation on emergency response/notification
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2025
Responsible Agency Wayzata Police Department
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Achieve certification in National Weather Service StormReady program
Project Title/Action 2A1: Meet requirements of the program
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2025
Project Title/Action 2A2: Prepare Community Presentation on severe weather awareness
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2025
Responsible Agency EM Director
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Ensure water runoff choke points have adequate infrastructure to withstand flood
Project Title/Action 4A1: Inventory critical choke points and inspect and/or improve
infrastructure
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2026
Responsible Agency EM Director EM Coord
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury Power Lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work with the community to identify power lines that could be buried
to reduce power failures in heavily populated areas
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM Director EM Coord
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
139
3.3.21. CITY OF LORETTO
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
140
2024 Loretto Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Establish Multi‐Jurisdictional partnership to reduce runoff
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Work with the local water sheds to continue to protect our
lakes and streams for future water quality
City of Loretto 7.5K 5 years Ongoing Low 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Sewer Pond Connection to Sewer Line
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Connect old sewer ponds to the metro sewer system City of Loretto 850K 5 Years Complete
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Wellhead Protection Plan: Work with the State and County
to meet their requirements
City of Loretto Staff
Time
Ongoing Ongoing 2 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Outdoor Warning Siren
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
141
6A1 Replace aging siren City of Loretto 29K 5 years Ongoing Low 1
Objective 6B: Improve Intersection at Railroad crossing for quiet zone
6B1 Work with the County to improve the intersection over the
Canadian Pacific Railroad crossing for a future quiet zone
City of Loretto 240K Ongoing 2024 3 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Storm Shelter‐ South of Railroad Crossing
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Build a Storm shelter in the city park for severe weather
incidents
City of Loretto 600K 5 years Delayed 1 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
142
Loretto 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Establish Multi‐Jurisdictional partnership to reduce runoff
Project Title/Action 3A1: Work with the local water sheds to continue to protect our lakes and
streams for future water quality
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Loretto
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Sewer Pond Connection to Sewer Line
Project Title/Action 4A1: Connect old sewer ponds to the metro sewer system
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency City of Loretto
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Project Title/Action 5A1: Work with the State and County to meet their requirements
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Loretto
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Outdoor Warning Siren
Project Title/Action 6A1: Replace aging siren
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency City of Loretto
OBJECTIVE: 6B: Improve Intersection at Railroad crossing for quiet zone
Project Title/Action 6B1: Work with the County to improve the intersection over the Canadian
Pacific Railroad crossing for a future quiet zone
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency City of Loretto
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Storm Shelter – South of Railroad Crossing
Project Title/Action 7A1: Build a Storm shelter in the city Park for severe weather incidents
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency City of Loretto
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
143
3.3.22. CITY OF MAPLE GROVE
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
144
2024 Maple Grove Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Hazardous Materials Preparedness
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Hazardous Material facility inspections for code
compliance and planning to include protect in
place/evacuation strategies.
Maple Grove Fire 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1A2 Hazardous Material data maintained for materials in
fixed facilities
Maple Grove Fire 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1A3 Hazardous Material planning and training for
transportation related hazardous materials
emergencies
Maple Grove Fire Man
hours: 12
Annual Ongoing Low 1
Objective 1B: Wildland Fire
1B1 Use GIS mapping of wildfire hazard areas to identify
hazards and assess overall community vulnerability.
Maple Grove Fire 0 18
months
Delayed Low 1
1B2 Review comprehensive plan to ensure wildfire
mitigation has been addressed, including review of
code of ordinances.
Maple Grove Fire 0 18
months
Delayed Low 1
Objective 1C: Terrorism Awareness and Preparedness
1C Collaborate with LE, MNJAC, and Emergency service
partners to maintain situation awareness of possible
threats, including regional mass casualty response
training.
MG Police and
Fire
0 Ongoing Ongoing 9 1
Objective 1B: Severe Weather
1D1 Maintain outdoor warning/alert capability
(Maple Grove has 22 outdoor warning sirens)
Maple Grove Fire $25,000
per year
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1D2 Increase severe weather awareness and encourage
severe weather planning in residential and commercial
occupancies
Maple Grove Fire 0 Ongoing Ongoing 2 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Educate Public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
145
2A Provide information to the public on the city website
and through public education opportunities
Maple Grove Fire 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2B: Promote partnerships between state, county, local jurisdictions and partner agencies to identify, prioritize, and
implement mitigation actions
2B1 Participate as a member in local or regional hazard
mitigation planning groups (i.e. North Suburban
Emergency Management Planning Group, etc)
Maple Grove Fire Man
hours: 15‐
20
Ongoing Ongoing 8 1
2B2 Support or provide public sector events, workshops.
Symposiums, and continued education opportunities
Maple Grove Fire
and Police
Man
hours: 20
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2C: Work with businesses and other local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in local community
2C1 Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard
mitigation principles and practices
Maple Grove Fire
and CED
Man
hours: 50
Ongoing Ongoing 1 1
2C2 Encourage businesses to develop and implement
hazard mitigation actions
Maple Grove Fire
and CED
Man
hours: 25
Ongoing Ongoing 1 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Maintain parks and support Three Rivers Park District
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Monitor for drought impact and invasive species Maple Grove
Park and
Recreation
0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
3A2 Wildfire suppression and assist with wildland
management of fuels
MGFD and MGPR $20,000 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1, 2
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Encourage construction of Safe Rooms
4A1 Encourage the construction and use of safe rooms in
homes and shelter areas of parks, shopping malls, or
other vulnerable public structures
Maple Grove
Fire, CED, and
Park and
Recreation
0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 4B: Conduct Tornado Awareness Activities
4B1 Educate citizens through traditional and social media
outlets
MGFD 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
4B2 Conduct tornado drills in schools and public buildings MGFD 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
4B3 Support severe weather awareness week in Minnesota MGFD 0 Annual Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
146
Objective 4C: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to a hazardous materials spill.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4C1 Continue to use Maple Grove and Hennepin County
GIS to map and update locations of fixed facilities
using hazardous materials and associated
transportation routes in a timely manner.
Maple Grove Fire
Department
0 Ongoing Ongoing 6 1
4C2 Provide Railroad & Pipeline Safety Awareness Level
training for First Responders
Maple Grove Fire
Department
Man
Hours 12
Annual
Training
Ongoing Low 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Bi‐directional Amplifiers (BDA) Equipment
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Improve radio coverage in Boston Scientific Buildings Maple Grove Fire
Department
$30,000 2 years Ongoing 2 1
5A2 Review buildings in city with poor radio coverage and
meet with building owners regarding installing BDA
system
Maple Grove Fire
and Police
Man
hours:
Unknown
Ongoing Ongoing 2 1
Objective 5B: Distribute emergency messaging via mobile communication devices and broadcast radio
5B1 Code RED mass notification Maple Grove Fire
and Police
$10,500
per year
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
5B2 Encourage understanding and adoption of WEA and
IPAWS messaging
Maple Grove Fire
Department
0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
5B3 Promote use of NOAA Weather Radios and benefit of
owning a battery powered portable radio
Maple Grove Fire 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Reduce risk factors of private business, family, and public structures in addition to at risk populations
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Maple Grove Community and Economic Development
Department will continue to ensure that building
permits and codes current and meet industry
standards.
Maple Grove CED 0 Ongoing Ongoing 7 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
147
6A2 Maple Grove Park and Recreation Department will
work to avoid developing park areas near pre‐
identified high‐risk hazard locations.
Maple Grove
Park and
Recreation
0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Educate first responders to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Ensure that all essential city departments (police, fire,
public works) have the latest edition of the Emergency
Response Guidebook
Maple Grove Fire
Department
Man
hours: 5
Ongoing Ongoing 5 1, 2
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A Maple Grove Parks and Recreation Trail Barriers and Barrier Reductions
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
8A1 Identify restrictions to the trail system to increase access
to recreational facilities and amenities as outlined in MG
Comprehensive Plan
Maple Grove
Park Board
$2‐3M Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A Water conservation and water loss control
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
9A1 Encourage the use of water conservation kits to reduce
water consumption and preserve ground water resources
Maple Grove
Public Works
0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 9B Environmental Resilience
9B1 Restrict development in areas subject to natural disasters,
such as flood plains and wetlands.
Community
and Economic
Development
Department
0 Ongoing Ongoing 10 1
9B2 Encourage Sustainable design elements in building
construction, lighting HVAC systems, & stormwater
management.
CED 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
9B3 Engage in risk‐assessment process to identify areas most
at risk from likely natural disasters.
Maple Grove
Fire, CED, and
Public Works
Unknown Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
148
9B4 Review and upgrade stormwater facilities to meet current
and future needs
Maple Grove
Public Works
$3‐5M Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
9B5 Cost‐effective sewer system that provides equitably
financed new trunks, while operating and maintaining
existing system
Maple Grove
Public Works
$4‐8M Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A Economic Resiliency
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
10A1 Encourage self‐sufficiency in energy production and
resiliency to energy disruptions through micro‐grids, co‐
generation, protection of supply lines and other measures
MG CED and
Public Works
Departments
Minimal Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
10A2 Embrace energy efficiency to reduce associated costs MG CED and
Public Works
Minimal Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 10B Community lifelines
10B1 Proactively engage with civic organizations to help identify
residents most vulnerable to emergency events and help
prioritize responses
Maple Grove
Fire and Police
Departments
Unknown Ongoing Ongoing 4 1
10B2 Embrace complete street policies to allow alternative
transportation options and plan opportunities for
pedestrian and bicycle movement
CED 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
149
Maple Grove 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to a
hazardous materials spill
Project Title/Action 4A1: Continue to use Maple Grove and Hennepin County GIS to map and
update locations of fixed facilities using hazardous materials and associated
transportation routes in a timely manner
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 4A2: Provide Railroad & Pipeline Safety Awareness Level training for first
responders
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Maple Grove Fire Department
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Educate first responders to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation
actions
Project Title/Action 7A1: Ensure that all essential city departments (police, fire, public works)
have the latest edition of the Emergency Response Guidebook
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Maple Grove Fire Department
OBJECTIVE: 7B: Develop redundancy in communication infrastructure for routine and emergency notification
Project Title/Action 7B1: Link City radio assets by fiber optics
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 7B2: Implement/utilize VHF radio systems to provide backup paging and
communication capability
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 7B3: Institute SkyWarn warning base with multimode communication
capability
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency Maple Grove Fire Department
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
150
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
151
3.3.23. CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
152
2024 Maple Plain Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Flooding: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to flooding.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Review and compare existing flood control standards, zoning,
and building requirements. Review and develop engineering
plans with new street improvements, storm sewer runoff
design, and INI improvements.
Public Works,
Engineers,
and water
shed
districts.
$10,000 5 years Ongoing 1 1
1A2 Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐
prone areas
Public Works,
Engineers,
and water
shed
districts.
$10,000 5 years Ongoing 2 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Invest in a comprehensive emergency notification system to immediately notify all citizens of an emergency, the action plan, and
response to the emergency.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Work with Maple Plain to purchase Code Red or Ever bridge
notification system for our residents.
City Staff $5,000 1 year Complet
e
Objective 2B: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions
2B1 Provide information to the public on the city website and
through public education opportunities
City Staff,
West
Hennepin
Police
$5,000 1 year Complet
e
Objective 2C: Work with Chamber of Commerce, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in local community.
2C1 Encourage businesses to develop and implement hazard
mitigation actions.
EM Undeterm
ined
Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Reduction of waste and runoff into our lakes, streams, and watersheds.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
153
3A1 Work with our local watershed districts to make improvements
to protect our lakes and streams for water quality.
City
engineers,
watershed
districts,
Public Works
$10,000
Annually
3‐5 years Ongoing Low 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Overhead power lines within the city.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Work with Excel Energy to remove and install underground
power on future development projects.
City
Engineer,
Staff, Xcel
Energy
>$1,000,0
00
10‐20
years
Ongoing Low 1
Objective 4B: Maple Plain Water Treatment Facility.
4B1 Security Protection, building upgrades, backup generator
installed
City and
West
Hennepin
Police,
Wright
Hennepin.
$10,000 2 years Complet
e
Objective 4C: Highway 12 Corridor Improvements
4C1 Complete redesign of Highway 12 through Maple Plain City and
West
Hennepin
Police,
Wright
Hennepin.
>$1,000,0
00
5‐20 years Ongoing Low 1, 4, 5
Objective 4D: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
4D1 Identify and train staff on emergency response to a railroad
disaster on the railroad. Develop an emergency response
evacuation plan, educate citizens and train on it.
City and
West
Hennepin
Police,
Wright
Hennepin.
$10,000 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
154
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses, Non‐
Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Continue to meet the state and Federal regulations with the
protection plan.
City Staff,
Public Works
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Outdoor Warning Sirens
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Identify future sites for new sirens if new development and
future group occurs
City Staff and
Public Works,
West
Hennepin
Police
Staff Time
Siren
Install
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 6B: In ground electrical lines.
6B1 Work with city engineers to promote and require all new
development to includes in ground power lines vs. overhead
power lines.
City Staff and
Public Works,
West
Hennepin
Police
$40,000 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Bury all power lines.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work with the community and Excel to identify power lines that
could be buried to reduce power failures in Maple Plain.
City planner,
engineer, city
staff
Staff Time
>$1,000,0
00
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 7B: Trim back all trees/brush around Xcel Energy power lines to require road right of way setbacks.
7B1 City and County Public Works and Excel energy remove trees
causing hazard to our power lines
Public Works,
Xcel Energy,
and other
$50,000
Staff Time
3‐5 years Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
155
power
companies
Objective 7C: Backup generator installed for West Hennepin Public Safety Department.
7C1 Install backup generator to operate West Hennepin Police
Department.
City $40,000 1 year Complet
e
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A Ensure vulnerable populations are adequately protected from the impacts of extreme temperatures
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
8A1 Create a database to track those individuals at high risk of
death, such as elderly, homeless, etc.
City/West
Hennepin EM
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A Reduce impacts of localized street flooding
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
9A1 Evaluate opportunities for storm water drainage at Howard Ave
and other city street
City Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more resistant
to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
10A1 Working with Lakes area Emergency Management Groups on
tabletops fall of 2024, towards a drill and then functional
exercise in 2024 and a full‐scale exercise in 2026
West
Hennepin EM
7,000 2026 Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
156
Maple Plain 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Flooding: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses
due to flooding
Project Title/Action 1A1: Review and compare existing flood control standards, zoning, and
building requirements. Review and develop engineering plans with new
street improvements, storm sewer runoff design, and INI improvements
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 1A2: Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐prone
areas
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Public Works, Engineers, and water shed districts.
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Invest in a comprehensive emergency notification system to immediately notify all citizens of
an emergency, the action plan, and response to the emergency
Project Title/Action 2A1: Work with Maple Plain to purchase Code Red or Everbridge
notification system for our residents
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City Staff
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions
Project Title/Action 2B1: Provide information to the public on the city website and through
public education opportunities
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City Staff. West Hennepin Police
OBJECTIVE: 2C: Work with Chamber of Commerce, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard
mitigation in local community
Project Title/Action 2C1: Encourage businesses to develop and implement hazard mitigation
actions
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City Staff‐ West Hennepin Chamber
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Reduction of waste and runoff into our lakes, streams, and watersheds
Project Title/Action 3A1: Work with our local watershed districts to make improvements to
protect our lakes and streams for water quality
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City engineers, watershed districts, Public Works
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Overhead power lines within the city
Project Title/Action 4A1: Work with Xcel Energy to remove and install underground power on
future development projects
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City Engineer, Staff, Xcel Energy.
OBJECTIVE: 4B: Maple Plain Water Treatment Facility
Project Title/Action 4B1: Security Protection, building upgrades, backup generator installed
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City and West Hennepin Police, Wright Hennepin
OBJECTIVE: 4C: Highway 12 Corridor Improvements
Project Title/Action 4C: Complete redesign of Highway 12 through Independence
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City and West Hennepin Police, Wright Hennepin
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
157
OBJECTIVE: 4D: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
Project Title/Action 4D1: Identify and train staff on emergency response to a railroad disaster
on the railroad. Develop an emergency response evacuation plan, educate
citizens and train on it
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City and West Hennepin Police, Wright Hennepin
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Project Title/Action 5A1: Continue to meet the state and Federal regulations with the
protection plan
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City Staff, Public Works
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Outdoor Warning Sirens
Project Title/Action 6A1: Identify future sites for new sirens if new development and future
group occurs
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City Staff and Public Works, West Hennepin Police.
OBJECTIVE: 6B: In‐Ground electrical lines
Project Title/Action 6B1: Work with city engineers to promote and require all new
development to include in ground power lines vs. overhead power lines
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City Staff and Public Works, West Hennepin Police.
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury all power lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work with the community and Xcel Energy to identify power lines that
could be buried to reduce power failures in Maple Plain
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City planner, engineer, city staff
OBJECTIVE: 7B: Trim back all trees/brush around Xcel Energy power lines to require road right of way setbacks
Project Title/Action 7B1: City and County Public Works and Xcel Energy remove trees causing
hazard to our power lines
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Public Works, Xcel Energy, and other power companies
OBJECTIVE: 7C: Backup generator installed for West Hennepin Public Safety Department
Project Title/Action 7C1: Install backup generator to operate West Hennepin Police
Department
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City/West Hennepin
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
158
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
159
3.3.24. CITY OF MEDICINE LAKE
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
160
2024 Medicine Lake Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Remove hazard trees that pose a risk to public right of ways or
private or public property.
Public Works $50,000 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1A2 Clear downed trees and remove underbrush on City owned
property to reduce wildfire danger.
Public Works $15,000 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1A3 Develop, maintain, and revise the City’s Continuity of Operations
and Emergency Operations Plan.
City Council,
EM
N/A May 2024 On
Schedule
2 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Alert citizens during community events of existing severe weather
and disaster preparedness educational opportunities.
EM, Fire $1,000 December
2024
On
Schedule
Low 1
2A2 Host annual severe weather and disaster preparedness community
educational courses.
EM, Fire $500 December
2024
On
Schedule
Low 1
2A3 Inform citizens of current methods of communicating severe
weather warnings through mailings.
EM, Fire $500 December
2024
On
Schedule
Low 1
2A4 Educate community on flood precautions for private water wells
through mailings and at community gatherings.
EM, Fire $500 December
2024
On
Schedule
Low 1
2A5 Educate Public to the dangers to lake water quality by use of lawn
additives and ice melt on driveways and sidewalks.
TBD $500 December
2024
On
Schedule
Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Identify and remediate trees infested with destructive invasive
pests.
Public Works $50,000 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
3A2 Explore formation of a Water and Wetland Commission to protect
lake water quality, water level, and wetland preservation.
City Council N/A December
2024
On
Schedule
1 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
161
Objective 4A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses, Non‐
Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Explore formation of a Water and Wetland Commission to
coordinate and work with the multiple state, federal, and municipal
entities necessary to protect lake water level and quality and
wetland preservation.
City Council N/A December
2024
On
Schedule
Low 1
5A2 Obtain radio communications equipment for Emergency
Management personnel and conduct training related thereto.
City Council,
EM
$1,000 December
2024
On
Schedule
5 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Enforce existing codes to ensure future developments meet
standards set to promote resistance to disaster.
Zoning N/A Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Bury power lines. TBD $2 million 2024‐
2027
On
Schedule
Low 1, 4, 5
7A2 Convert City to municipal water system and prepare to connect
homes to municipal water on emergency basis in the event of
water well contamination.
City Council $2.7 million 2024‐
2027
On
Schedule
4 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
162
8A1 Develop, review, and revise City evacuation plans to assist citizens
with limited mobility.
EM, Fire N/A August
2024
On
Schedule
3 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
9A1 Explore formation of a Water and Wetland Commission to
coordinate and work with the multiple state, federal, and
municipal entities necessary to review lake water level issues
related to climate change related drought.
City Council N/A December
2024
On
Schedule
Low 1
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more resistant to
failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Medicine Lake 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
No Prior Projects.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
163
3.3.25. CITY OF MEDINA
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
164
2024 Medina Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Ensure all essential city first responders have the current revision of the Emergency Response Guidebook
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Distribute guidebooks when updated/received from Henn Co &
assure responders are trained on their use
Medina EM Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1, 2
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Post link to severe weather articles on social media to increase residential awareness
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Utilize HSEM (dps.mn.gov) website for article content;
post in April for ‘Severe Weather Awareness Week’
post in November for ‘Winter Hazard Awareness Week’
Medina EM Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 5 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Establish Multi‐Jurisdictional partnership to reduce runoff
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Work with the local watersheds to continue to protect our lakes
and streams for future water quality
City of
Medina
20K Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Identify at‐risk residents who may be exceptionally vulnerable in the event of a long‐term power outage
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Organize outreach and promote transitioning to a climate‐
controlled location during the power outage
Medina EM Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses, Non‐
Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Continue to meet the State and Federal regulations with the
protection plan
City of
Medina
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
165
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Outdoor Warning Siren
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Identify future sites for new sirens in the new developments Emergency
Manager
90K Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
Objective 6B: Maintain Inter County Roads
6B1 Work with the State and County to improve intersections with high
accident rates
City of
Medina
50K Ongoing Ongoing Low 1, 4
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Bury Power Lines
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work with the community to identify power lines that could be
buried to reduce power failures in heavily populated areas
City of
Medina
450K Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A: Ensure vulnerable populations are adequately protected from the impacts of extreme temperatures
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
8A1 Create a database to track those individuals at high risk of death,
such as elderly, homeless, etc.
Medina EM Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 4 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A: Reduce impacts of localized street flooding
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
9A1 Evaluate opportunities for Willow Drive and Tamarack Drive (x2) Medina
Public
Works
$1 million Ongoing Ongoing 2 1
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more resistant to
failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
166
10A1 Working with Lakes area Emergency Management Groups on
tabletops fall of 2024, towards a drill and then functional exercise
in 2024 and a full‐scale exercise in 2025
Medina EM 5,000 2026 Ongoing 1 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
167
Medina 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Establish Multi‐Jurisdictional partnership to reduce runoff
Project Title/Action 3A1: Work with the local watersheds to continue to protect our lakes and
streams for future water quality
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Medina
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Wellhead protection plan
Project Title/Action 5A1: Continue to meet the State and Federal regulations with the
protection plan
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Medina
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Outdoor Warning Siren
Project Title/Action 6A1: Identify future sites for new sirens in the new developments
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 6B: Maintain Inter‐County Roads
Project Title/Action 6B1: Work with the State and County to improve intersections with high
accident rates
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Medina
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury Power Lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work with the community to identify power lines that could be buried
to reduce power failures in heavily populated areas
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Medina
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
168
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
169
3.3.26. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
170
2024 Minneapolis Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Spring thaw and water bodies rising
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Improve Storm‐Water Management Planning Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Complete
1A2 Adopt Policies to Reduce Storm‐Water Runoff Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Complete
Objective 1B: Short term flooding from torrential rain
1B1 Improve Storm‐Water Management Planning Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Complete
1B2 Adopt Policies to Reduce Storm‐Water Runoff Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Complete
Objective 1C: Unusual snow event
1C1 Adopt and enforce building codes Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Complete
1C2 Protect buildings and infrastructure Undetermined Undetermined N/A Complete
1C3 Protect power lines Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1, 4, 5
1C4 Reduce impacts to roadways Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1, 4, 5
Objective 1D: Wind/Tornados
1D1 Encourage construction of safe rooms Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
1D2 Require wind‐resistant building techniques Undetermined Personnel Time 1 Year In Progress Low 1
Objective 1E: Evacuation routes‐downtown, rail/hazmat
1E1 Assess community risk Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
Objective 1F: Landslides/subsidence
1F1 Map and assess vulnerability to landslides Undetermined Personnel Time 1 Year In Progress Low 1
1F2 Prevent impacts to roadways Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
1F3 Map and assess vulnerability to subsidence Undetermined Personnel Time 1 Year In Progress Low 1
1F4 Manage development in high‐risk areas Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Complete
1F5 Consider subsidence in building design Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Complete
1F6 Monitor subsidence risk factors Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Complete
1F7 Remove existing structures from subsidence
hazard areas
Undetermined Undetermined N/A Cancelled
Objective 1G: Vulnerable populations, lack of resiliency
1G1 Improve household disaster preparedness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
171
1G2 Increase hazard education and risk awareness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
1G3 Assist vulnerable populations Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 1H: Warning notification ‐downtown
1H1 Assess community risk Emergency
Management
Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
1H2 Assist vulnerable populations Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 1I: Severe cold; close schools, impact on infrastructure
1I1 Reduce urban heat island effect Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
1I2 Increase awareness of extreme temperature
risk and safety
Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
1I3 Educate property owners about freezing pipes Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 1J: Severe hot weather
1J1 Reduce urban heat island effect Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
1J2 Increase awareness of extreme temperature
risk and safety
Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
Objective 1K: Lightning strikes
1K1 Protect critical facilities and equipment Undetermined Undetermined Undetermined In Progress Low 1, 4, 5
Objective 1L: Fire with high winds, structure, and conflagration
None
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Public outreach‐rail corridor
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Improve household disaster preparedness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
2A2 Increase hazard education and risk awareness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
2A3 Integrate mitigation into local planning Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
Objective 2B: Evacuation routes‐downtown, rail/hazmat
2B1 Protect infrastructure and critical facilities Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
172
2B2 Increase hazard education and risk awareness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
2B3 Improve household disaster preparedness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 2C: Wind/Tornados
2C1 Conduct tornado awareness activities Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
2C2 Increase hazard education and risk awareness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
2C3 Improve household disaster preparedness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
Objective 2D: Power grid down/interruption: Address heat and cold conditions
2D1 Protect infrastructure and critical facilities Undetermined Undetermined N/A Complete
2D2 Reduce urban heat island effect Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
2D3 Increase awareness of extreme temperature
risk and safety
Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
2D4 Protect power lines Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
2D5 Increase hazard education and risk awareness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
2D6 Improve household disaster preparedness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 2E: Vulnerable populations, lack of resiliency
2E1 Improve household disaster preparedness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
2E2 Increase hazard education and risk awareness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
2E3 Assist vulnerable populations Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 2F: Warning notification ‐downtown
2F1 Assess community risk Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
2F2 Assist vulnerable populations Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
2F3 Increase hazard education and risk awareness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
173
Objective 2G: Severe cold; close schools, impact on infrastructure
2G1 Increase awareness of extreme temperature
risk and safety
Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
2G2 Increase hazard education and risk awareness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
Objective 2H: Severe hot weather
2H1 Increase awareness of extreme temperature
risk and safety
Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
2H2 Increase hazard education and risk awareness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
2H3 Improve household disaster preparedness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress 3 1
Objective 2I: Lightning strikes
2I1 Conduct lightning awareness programs Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
2I2 Increase hazard education and risk awareness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In progress Low 1
2I3 Improve household disaster preparedness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 2J: Unusual snow event
2J1 Conduct winter weather risk awareness
activities
Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
2J2 Increase awareness of extreme temperature
risk and safety
Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
2J3 Increase hazard education and risk awareness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
2J4 Improve household disaster preparedness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time N/A Complete
Objective 2K: Landslides/subsidence
2K1 Educate residents about subsidence Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
2K2 Increase hazard education and risk awareness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
174
Objective 3A: Tree canopy decline
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Reduce urban heat island effect Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 3B: Landslides/subsidence
3B1 Map and assess vulnerability to landslides Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Cancelled
3B2 Prevent impacts to roadways Undetermined Undetermined N/A Cancelled
3B3 Map and assess vulnerability to subsidence Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Cancelled
3B4 Manage development in high‐risk areas Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
3B5 Consider subsidence in building design Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
3B6 Monitor subsidence risk factors Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Cancelled
3B7 Remove existing structures from subsidence
hazard areas
Undetermined Undetermined N/A Cancelled
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Security of water plant
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Protect infrastructure and critical facilities Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 4B: Power grid down interruption: Address heat and cold conditions
4B1 Protect infrastructure and critical facilities Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
4B2 Reduce urban heat island effect Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 4C: Landslides/subsidence
4C1 Map and assess vulnerability to landslides Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Cancelled
4C2 Map and assess vulnerability to subsidence Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Cancelled
4C3 Monitor subsidence risk factors Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Cancelled
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Evacuation routes‐downtown, rail/hazmat
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Assess community risk Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
5A2 Map community risk Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
175
5A3 Adopt development regulations in hazard
areas
Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Complete
5A4 Limit density in hazard areas Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Complete
5A5 Protect structures Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
5A6 Protect infrastructure and critical facilities Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 5B: Major planned events and their impact on the community‐scenario planning
5B1 Assess community risk Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
5B2 Map community risk Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress 2 1
5B3 Protect infrastructure and critical facilities Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 5C: Civil disturbance
5C1 Assess community risk Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Cancelled
5C2 Map community risk Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Cancelled
5C3 Protect infrastructure and critical facilities Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress 4 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Landslides/subsidence
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Map and assess vulnerability to landslides Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Cancelled
6A2 Map and assess vulnerability to subsidence Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Cancelled
6A3 Monitor subsidence risk factors Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Cancelled
6A4 Prevent impacts to roadways Undetermined Undetermined N/A Cancelled
6A5 Manage development in high‐risk areas Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
6A6 Consider subsidence in building design Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
6A7 Remove existing structures from subsidence
and landslide hazard areas
Undetermined Undetermined N/A Cancelled
Objective 6B: Short‐term flooding from torrential rain
6B1 Incorporate flood mitigation in local planning Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress 5 1
6B2 Limit or restrict development in floodplain
areas
Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Complete
6B3 Adopt and enforce building codes and
development standards
Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Complete
6B4 Adopt policies to reduce storm water runoff Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Complete
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
176
6B5 Protect infrastructure Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
6B6 Protect critical facilities Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 6C: Rail Corridor
6C1 Protect sensitive uses from rail corridors
potentially carrying hazardous materials
Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 6D: Extreme Heat
6D1 Reduce the urban heat island effect Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 6E: Wind/Tornado
6E1 Promote or require site and building design
standards to minimize wind damage
Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
6E2 Protect power lines and infrastructure Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Infrastructure failure‐water main e.g.,
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Protect infrastructure and critical facilities Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 7B: Drought; drinking water, source/intake
7B1 Protect infrastructure and critical facilities Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress 1 1
Objective 7C: Wind/Tornado
7C1 Conduct tornado awareness activities Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
7C2 Increase hazard education and risk awareness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
7C3 Improve household disaster preparedness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 7D: River contamination; drinking water, contamination
7D1 Protect infrastructure and critical facilities Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 7E: Evacuation routes‐downtown, rail/hazmat
7E1 Protect infrastructure and critical facilities Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
7E2 Increase hazard education and risk awareness Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
7E3 Improve household disaster preparedness Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Objective 7F: Landslide/subsidence
7F1 Map and assess vulnerability to landslides Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Cancelled
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
177
7F2 Map and assess vulnerability to subsidence Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Cancelled
7F3 Monitor subsidence risk factors Undetermined Personnel Time N/A Cancelled
7F4 Prevent impacts to roadways Undetermined Undetermined N/A Cancelled
7F5 Manage development in high‐risk areas Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
7F6 Consider subsidence in building design Undetermined Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
7F7 Remove existing structures from subsidence
hazard areas
Undetermined Undetermined N/A Cancelled
Objective 7G: Vulnerable populations, lack of resiliency
7G1 Improve household disaster preparedness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In progress Low 1
7G2 Increase hazard education and risk awareness Emergency
Management
Personnel Time Ongoing In Progress Low 1
7G3 Assist vulnerable populations Undetermined Undetermined Ongoing In Progress Low 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
178
Minneapolis 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Spring thaw and water bodies rising
Project Title/Action 1A1: Improve Storm‐water Management Planning
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1A2: Adopt Policies to Reduce Storm‐water Runoff
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1B: Short term flooding from torrential rain
Project Title/Action 1B1: Improve Storm‐water Management Planning
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1B2: Adopt Policies to Reduce Storm‐water Runoff
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1C: Unusual Snow Event
Project Title/Action 1C1: Adopt and Enforce Building Codes
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1C2: Protect Buildings and Infrastructure
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1C3: Protect Power Lines
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 1C4: Reduce Impacts to Roadways
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1D: Wind/Tornados
Project Title/Action 1D1: Encourage Construction of Safe Rooms
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 1D2: Require Wind‐Resistant Building Techniques
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1E: Evacuation routes‐downtown rail/hazmat
Project Title/Action 1E1: Assess Community Risk
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1F: Landslides/subsidence
Project Title/Action 1F1: Map and Assess Vulnerability to Landslides
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 1F2: Prevent Impacts to Railways
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 1F3: Map and Assess Vulnerability to Subsidence
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 1F4: Manage Development in High‐Risk Areas
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1F5: Consider Subsidence in Building Design
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1F6: Monitor Subsidence Risk Factors
Project Status Canceled
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
179
Project Title/Action 1F7: Remove Existing Structures from Subsidence Hazard Areas
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1G: Vulnerable populations, lack of resiliency
Project Title/Action 1G1: Improve household Disaster Preparations
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 1G2: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 1G3: Assist Vulnerable Populations
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1H: Warning notification ‐ downtown
Project Title/Action 1H1: Assess Community Risk
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 1H2: Assist Vulnerable Populations
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1I: Severe cold; close schools, impact on infrastructure
Project Title/Action 1I1: Reduce Urban Head Island Effect
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1I2: Increase Awareness of Extreme Temperature Risk and Safety
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 1I3: Educate Property Owners About Freezing Pipes
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1J: Severe hot weather
Project Title/Action 1J1: Reduce Urban Island Heat Island Effect
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 1J2: Increase Awareness of Extreme Temperature Risk and Safety
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1K: Lightning Strikes
Project Title/Action 1K1: Protect Critical Facilities and Equipment
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Public outreach‐rail corridor
Project Title/Action 2A1: Improve Household Disaster Preparedness
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 2A2: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 2A3: Integrate Mitigation into Local Planning
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Evacuation routes‐downtown, rail/hazmat
Project Title/Action 2B1: Protect Infrastructure and Critical Facilities
Project Status Canceled
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
180
Project Title/Action 2B2: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 2B3: Improve Household Disaster Preparedness
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2C: Wind/tornadoes
Project Title/Action 2C1: Conduct Tornado Awareness Activities
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 2C2: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 2C3: Improve Household Disaster Preparedness
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2D: Power grid down interruption: Address heat and cold conditions
Project Title/Action 2D1: Protect Infrastructure and Critical Facilities
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 2D2: Reduce Urban Heat Island Effect
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 2D3: Increase Awareness of extreme Temperature Risk and Safety
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 2D4: Protect Power Lines
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 2D5: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 2D6: Improve Household Disaster Preparedness
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2E: Vulnerable populations, lack of resiliency
Project Title/Action 2E1: Improve Household Disaster Preparedness
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 2E2: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 2E3: Assist Vulnerable Populations
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2F: Warning notification ‐ downtown
Project Title/Action 2F1: Assist Community Risk
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 2F2: Assist Vulnerable Populations
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 2F3: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2G: Severe cold; close schools, impact on infrastructure
Project Title/Action 2G1: Increase Awareness of Extreme Temperature Risk and Safety
Project Status Complete
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
181
Project Title/Action 2G2: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2H: Severe hot weather
Project Title/Action 2H1: Increase Awareness of Extreme Temperature Risk and Safety
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 2H2: Increase Hazard Education and Awareness
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 2H3: Improve Household Disaster Preparedness
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2I: Lightning Strikes
Project Title/Action 2I1: Conduct Lightning Awareness Programs
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 2I2: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 2I3: Improve Household Disaster Preparedness
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2J: Unusual snow event
Project Title/Action 2J1: Conduct Winter Weather Risk Awareness Activities
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 2J2: Increase Awareness of Extreme Temperature Risk and Safety
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 2J3: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 2J4: Improve Household Disaster Preparedness
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2K: Landslide/subsidence
Project Title/Action 2K1: Educate Residents about Subsidence
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 2K2: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Tree canopy decline
Project Title/Action 3A1: Reduce Urban Heat Island Effect
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 3B: Landslides/subsidence
Project Title/Action 3B1: Map and Assess Vulnerability to Landslides
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 3B2: Prevent Impacts to Roadways
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 3B3: Map and Assess Vulnerability to Subsidence
Project Status Canceled
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
182
Project Title/Action 3B4: Manage Development in High‐Risk Areas
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 3B5: Consider Subsidence in Building Design
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 3B6: Monitor Subsidence Risk Factors
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 3B7: Remove Existing Structures from Subsidence Hazard Areas
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Security of water plant
Project Title/Action 4A1: Protect Infrastructure and Critical Facilities
Project Status On‐Schedule
Summary of Project Protect drinking water supply by completing an all‐hazards vulnerability
assessment for drinking water system from source to tap.
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 4B: Power grid down interruption: Address heat and cold conditions
Project Title/Action 4B1: Protect Infrastructure and Critical Facilities
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 4B2: Reduce Urban Heat Island Effect
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 4C: Landslides/subsidence
Project Title/Action 4C1: Map and Assess Vulnerability to Landslides
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 4C2: Map and Assess Vulnerability to Subsidence
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 4C3: Monitor Subsidence Risk Factors
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Evacuation routes‐downtown, rail/hazmat
Project Title/Action 5A1: Assess Community Risk
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 5A2: Map Community Risk
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 5A3: Adopt Development Regulations in Hazard Areas
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 5A4: Limit Density in Hazard Areas
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 5A5: Protect Structures
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 5A6: Protect Infrastructure and Critical Facilities
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 5B: Major planned events and their impact on the community‐scenario planning
Project Title/Action 5B1: Assess Community Risk
Project Status On‐Schedule
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
183
Project Title/Action 5B2: Map Community Risk
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 5B3: Protect Infrastructure and Critical Facilities
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 5C: Civil Disturbance
Project Title/Action 5C1: Assess Community Risk
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 5C2: Map Community Risk
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 5C3: Protect Infrastructure and Critical Facilities
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Landslides/subsidence
Project Title/Action 6A1: Map and Assess Vulnerability to Landslides
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 6A2: Map and Assess Vulnerability to Subsidence
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 6A3: Monitor Subsidence Risk Factors
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 6A4: Prevent Impacts to Roadways
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 6A5: Manage Development in High‐Risk Areas
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 6A6: Consider Subsidence in Building Design
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 6A7: Remove Existing Structures from Subsidence and Landslide Hazard
Areas
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 6B: Short‐term flooding from torrential rain
Project Title/Action 6B1: Incorporate Flood Mitigation in Local Planning
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 6B2: Limit or Restrict Development in Floodplain Areas
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 6B3: Adopt and Enforce Building Codes and Development Standards
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 6B4: Adopt Policies to Reduce Storm water Runoff
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 6B5: Protect Infrastructure
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 6B6: Protect Critical Facilities
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
184
OBJECTIVE: 6C: Rail Corridor
Project Title/Action 6C1: Protect Sensitive Uses from Rail Corridors Potentially Carrying
Hazardous Materials
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 6D: Extreme Heat
Project Title/Action 6D1: Reduce Urban Heat Island Effect
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 6E: Wind/Tornado
Project Title/Action 6E1: Promote or Require Site and Building Design Standards to Minimize
Wind Damage
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 6E2: Promote Power Lines and Infrastructure
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Infrastructure failure‐water main e.g.,
Project Title/Action 7A1: Protect Infrastructure and Critical Facilities
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 7B: Drought; drinking water, source/intake
Project Title/Action 7B1: Protect Infrastructure and Critical Facilities
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 7C: Wind/Tornados
Project Title/Action 7C1: Conduct Tornado Awareness Activities
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 7C2: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 7C3: Improve Household Disaster Preparedness
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 7D: River contamination; drinking water, contamination
Project Title/Action 7D1: Protect Infrastructure and Critical Facilities
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 7E: Evacuation routes‐downtown, rail/hazmat
Project Title/Action 7E1: Protect Infrastructure and Critical Facilities
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 7E2: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 7E3: Improve Household Disaster Preparedness
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 7F: Landslides/subsidence
Project Title/Action 7F1: Map and Assess Vulnerability to Landslides
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
185
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 7F2: Map and Assess Vulnerability to Subsidence
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 7F3: Monitor Subsidence Risk Factors
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 7F4: Prevent Impacts to Roadways
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 7F5: Manage Development in High‐Risk Areas
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 7F6: Consider Subsidence in Building Design
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 7F7: Remove Existing Structures from Subsidence Hazard Areas
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 7G: Vulnerable populations, lack of resiliency
Project Title/Action 7G1: Improve Household Disaster Preparedness
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 7G2: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 7G3: Assist Vulnerable Populations
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
186
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
187
3.3.27. CITY OF MINNETONKA
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
188
2024 Minnetonka Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Improve Community Notification Capabilities
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Distribute guidebooks when updated ones are received from
Hennepin County, and assure responders are trained on their use
Minnetonka
Fire and EM
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 10 1, 2
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Achieve certification in National Weather Service StormReady program
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Continue to promote Storm Ready ideals of awareness, outreach,
and preparation.
Minnetonka
Fire and EM
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 12 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program. Minnetonka
Community
Development
and
Engineering
Staff Time
Ongoing
Ongoing 11 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Ensure water runoff choke points have adequate infrastructure to withstand flood
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Update GIS data based on changing city development and criteria
evolution.
Minnetonka
Engineering
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 7 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses, Non‐
Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Promote the use of WebEOC for communication with Hennepin County, for relaying to state and federal agencies.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
189
5A1 Conduct WebEOC training sessions for key staff once the major
software updates are installed.
Minnetonka
Fire and EM
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 9 1
Objective 5B: Tabletop Exercise
5B1 Conduct a tabletop exercise in the city’s emergency operations
center for city staff.
Minnetonka
Fire and EM
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 4 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Continue to enforce permitting, building, floodplain, and fire code
compliance on all development.
Minnetonka
Community
Development
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
6A2 Examine how zoning ordinances may create barriers to response
and recovery efforts pre‐, during, and post‐event, including equity
considerations.
Minnetonka
Community
Development;
EM; and
Diversity,
Equity
Inclusion
Coordinator;
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Bury power lines
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Continue to encourage the use of buried power lines and
floodplain mitigation in all development
Minnetonka
Community
Development,
engineering,
Fire, and Xcel
Energy
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 8 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
190
8A1 Identify barriers that prevent underserved communities, vulnerable
populations and those with access and functional needs from
participating in public meetings.
Minnetonka
Community
Development;
and Diversity,
Equity and
Inclusion
Coordinator
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 5 1
8A2 Review opportunities to expand translation services for public
education
Minnetonka
Community
Development;
and Diversity,
Equity and
Inclusion
Coordinator
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 6 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
9A1 Implement community‐wide Climate Action and Adaptation Plan. Minnetonka
Community
Development;
and Diversity,
Equity and
Inclusion
Coordinator
Staff time Ongoing Ongoing 1 1
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more resistant to
failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
10A1 Research, identify and secure grant funding for backup generators
for the Willison Fitness Center and the Marsh facilities that serve as
community lifeline/shelter and critical infrastructure for possible
natural hazards.
Minnetonka
Recreation;
Minnetonka
Public Works;
Staff Time 6 Months Delayed 2 1, 4, 5
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
191
and
Minnetonka
Fire and EM
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
192
Minnetonka 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Ensure that all essential city first responders have the current version of the Emergency
Response Guidebook
Project Title/Action 1A1: Distribute guidebooks when updated ones are received from
Hennepin County, and assure responders are trained on their use
Project Status Ongoing
Summary of Project Update
Responsible Agency Minnetonka Fire and E/M
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Maintain the city’s National Weather Service StormReady certification
Project Title/Action 2A1: Continue to promote StormReady ideals of awareness, outreach, and
preparation
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Minnetonka Fire and E/M
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Assure continued compliance and participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
Project Title/Action 3A1: Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Minnetonka Community Development and Engineering
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Utilize GIS data for identification of areas
Project Title/Action 4A1: Update GIS data based on changing city development and criteria
evolution
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Minnetonka Engineering
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Promote the use of WebEOC for communication with Hennepin County, for relaying to state
and federal agencies
Project Title/Action 5A1: Conduct WebEOC training sessions for key staff once the major
software updated are installed
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Minnetonka Fire and E/M
OBJECTIVE: 5B: Tabletop exercise
Project Title/Action 5B1: Conduct a tabletop exercise in the city’s emergency operations center
for city staff
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Minnetonka Fire and E/M
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Provide for compliant development
Project Title/Action 6A1: Continue to enforce permitting, building, floodplain, and fire code
compliance on all development
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Minnetonka Community Development
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Advocate for the use of buried power utilities and sound floodplain management
Project Title/Action 7A1: Continue to encourage the use of buried power lines and floodplain
mitigation in all development
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Minnetonka Community Development Engineering, Fire, and Xcel Energy
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
193
3.3.28. CITY OF MINNETONKA BEACH
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
194
2024 Minnetonka Beach Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Flooding: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to flooding
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐prone
areas
City of
Minnetonka
Beach
Staff Time 2024‐2028 Ongoing 4 1
1A2 Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program City of
Minnetonka
Beach
Staff Time 2024‐2028 Ongoing 3 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Work with Chamber of Commerce, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in local community
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles
and practices
City of
Minnetonka
Beach
Staff Time 2024‐2028 Ongoing 6 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Establish Multi‐Jurisdictional partnership to reduce runoff
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Work with the local watersheds to continue to protect our lakes
and streams for future water quality
City of
Minnetonka
Beach
Cost for
construction
of holding
ponds
Design
Construction
2024‐2028 Ongoing 5 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
195
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses, Non‐
Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Continue to meet the State and Federal regulations with the
protection plan
City of
Minnetonka
Beach
Staff Time 2024‐2028 Ongoing 2 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Build and support local capacity and commitment to become less vulnerable to hazards
Objective 7A: Bury Power Lines
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work with the community to identify power lines that could be
buried to reduce power failures in heavily populated areas
City of
Minnetonka
Beach
Plans
Construction
2024‐2028 Ongoing 1 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more resistant to
failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
196
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
197
Minnetonka Beach 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Flooding: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses
due to flooding
Project Title/Action 1A1: Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐prone
areas
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 1A2: Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Minnetonka Beach
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Work with Chamber of Commerce, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard
mitigation in local community
Project Title/Action 2A1: Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles
and practices
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Orono
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Establish Multi‐Jurisdictional partnership to reduce runoff
Project Title/Action 3A1: Work with the local watersheds to continue to protect our lakes and
streams for future water quality
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Minnetonka Beach
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Project Title/Action 5A1: Continue to meet the State and Federal regulations with the
protection plan
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Minnetonka Beach
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury Power Lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work with the community to identify power lines that could be buried
to reduce power failures in heavily populated areas
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Minnetonka Beach
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
198
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
199
3.3.29. CITY OF MINNETRISTA
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
200
2024 Minnetrista Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Flooding: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to flooding
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Review and update policies that discourage growth in
flood‐prone areas
City of
Minnetrista
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1A2 Continue to participate in the National Flood
Insurance Program
City of
Minnetrista
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Work with local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in local community.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard
mitigation principles and practices
City of
Minnetrista
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Establish Multi‐Jurisdictional partnership to reduce runoff
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Work with the local watersheds to continue to
protect our lakes and streams for future water quality
City of
Minnetrista
Cost for
construction
of holding
ponds
Design
Construction
Ongoing Ongoing 2 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
201
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Continue to meet the State and Federal regulations
with the protection plan
City of
Minnetrista
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Bury Power Lines
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work with the community to identify power lines that
could be buried to reduce power failures in heavily
populated areas
City of
Minnetrista
Plans
Construction
Ongoing Too cost
prohibitive
1 1, 4, 5
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
202
Minnetrista 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Flooding: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses
due to flooding
Project Title/Action 1A1: Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐prone
areas
Project Status In‐Progress
Responsible Agency Planning Department
Project Title/Action 1A2: Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program
Project Status Ongoing
Summary of Project Planning Department
Responsible Agency City of Minnetrista
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Work with local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in local community
Project Title/Action 2A1: Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles
and practices
Project Status Ongoing
Summary of Project Administration, Police Department
Responsible Agency City of Minnetrista
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Establish Multi‐Jurisdictional partnership to reduce runoff
Project Title/Action 3A1: Work with the local watersheds to continue to protect our lakes and
streams for future water quality
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Minnetrista
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Project Title/Action 5A1: Continue to meet the State and Federal regulations with the
protection plan
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Minnetrista
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury Power Lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work with the community to identify power lines that could be buried
to reduce power failures in heavily populated areas
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Minnetrista
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
203
3.3.30. CITY OF MOUND
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
204
2024 Mound Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Develop and Implement a basic “Hazard Assessment‐ Risk Reduction Plan” to circumvent loss of life, injuries, or disasters.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Require proper utility locates have been completed per city
ordinance and state laws
City of
Mound
N/A Ongoing In
progress
1 1
1A2 Designate and/or create safe haven storm shelters in the community,
and communicate locations to the public
City of
Mound
N/A Dec‐2025 In
progress
5 1, 5
Objective 1B: Maintain or replace warning sirens on a regular basis or as necessary to insure siren functionality and effectiveness
1B1 Replace one (1) outdoor warning siren that was installed in 2009: due
to age, system failures, and normal system life expectancy.
City of
Mound
$34,000 2029 On hold 7 1
1B2 Ensure all outdoor warning sirens have a back‐up power source (i.e.:
battery or solar power back‐up system).
City of
Mound
$600.00
Annually
6 Months Complete
1B3 Continue to monitor outdoor warning siren test results to identify
any required maintenance needs.
City of
Mound
$3,100.00
Annually
Ongoing In
progress
2 1
Objective 1C: Ensure that all of the essential city first responders have the current version of the Emergency Response Guidebooks (ERG)
1C1 Distribute ERG guidebooks when the updated version is received
from Hennepin County. Ensure responders are well trained on use of
ERG.
Mound FD
Orono PD
N/A Every 4
years
Complete
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Maintain the city of Mound Weather Ready Nation Ambassador program and increase public knowledge and awareness with regard to
Severe Weather Risks.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Continue to promote important Weather Ready ideals of awareness,
outreach, and preparation.
City of
Mound EM
N/A July 2024 In
progress
4 1
2A2 Promote the use of NOAA Weather Radios in government‐owned
facilities, childcare centers, and facilities with vulnerable populations.
City of
Mound EM
N/A N/A Canceled Low 1
2A3 Continue to take steps toward achieving the Storm Ready Community
Certification
City of
Mound EM
N/A July 2024 Delayed 5 1
Objective 2B: Maintain the city of Mound Operation of a Mass‐notification System
2B1 Continue to promote enrollment in the city of Mound mass‐
notification system.
City of
Mound EM
N/A Ongoing In
progress
1 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
205
2B2 Continue to utilize newsletters, social media, and other outreach
program methods to inform the public about life safety risks and pre‐
emptive actions related to weather emergencies
City of
Mound EM
$3,100.00
Annually
Ongoing In
progress
2 1
2B3 Expand the use of the existing city mass notification system to
include all‐hazards and Weather Ready information.
City of
Mound EM
N/A Ongoing In
progress
3 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Assure continued compliance with the city’s policy on preservation of indigenous burial mounds
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Continue to require all projects occurring on known indigenous sites
to have approval from the state archeologist prior to work beginning.
City of
Mound
N/A Ongoing In
progress
1 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Assess community for potential hazards and identification of greatest risk
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Promote community wide (citizen) participation in threat and hazard
identification and the risk assessment process.
City of
Mound EM
N/A Ongoing Delayed 4 1
4A2 Promote the use of the Calculated Priority Risk Index formula to
prioritize identified threats and hazards within the community.
City of
Mound EM
N/A July 2024 In
progress
1 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses, Non‐
Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Promote the use of the WebEOC as a communication tool within Hennepin County, for relay of information to local, state, and federal
agencies
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Conduct WebEOC training sessions for key EM, Fire, and PW staff. City of
Mound
N/A Ongoing In
progress
2 1
5A2 Continue to review and update our city‐wide equipment capabilities
in the WebEOC database, as required.
City of
Mound
N/A December
2024
In
progress
3 1
Objective 5B: Ensure all first responders radio equipment is ARMER compatible.
5B1 Continue to replace obsolete or non‐supported handheld, mobile,
and base radios for all first responders as required.
Mound FD
& Orono PD
$36,842.00
Annually
N/A Complete
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
206
Objective 6A: Provide for compliant development to ensure that new or remodeled commercial and residential structures are designed and built to the
current state codes, I.e., building code, electrical code, and fire code.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Continue to adopt and enforce the applicable codes, I.e., Minnesota
State Codes and International Property Maintenance Code.
Coty of
Mound
Mound FD
N/A Ongoing In
progress
3 1
6A2 Enforce all zoning, floodplain, permitting, building, and fire code
requirements to ensure compliance on development.
City of
Mound
Mound FD
N/A Ongoing In
progress
1 1
6A3 Continue to utilize a building official in the issuance of various
required permits and inspections.
City of
Mound
$275,000
Annually
Ongoing In
progress
2 1
6A4 Review and update city building, and zoning codes as required. City of
Mound
N/A Ongoing In
progress
3 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Advocate for the jurisdictional infrastructure improvements that eliminates or reduces life safety threats caused by severe weather or
other natural disaster type hazards.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Bury power lines whenever possible and as practical to reduce the
potential for life safety hazards.
Xcel Energy ‐ Ongoing Delayed 7 1, 4, 5
7A2 Improve roads, road elevation levels, and retaining walls to assure
roadway access for emergency response vehicles and city services,
plus others that are providing basic core services
City of
Mound
TBD
Varies by
year
Ongoing
In
progress
4 1
Objective 7B: Develop and maintain a Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Renewal Plan
7B1 Renew and properly size pump and force main components to ensure
effectiveness based upon system demand.
City of
Mound
TBD
Varies by
year
Ongoing In
progress
6 1, 4
7B2 Install or maintain permanent on‐ site back‐up power supply systems
to prevent back flow and back‐up of black water during high flow and
storm events.
City of
Mound
TBD Varies
by year
Ongoing In
progress
4 1, 4
Objective 7C: Develop and Implement a storm, surface water, and flood response plan
7C1 Develop critical infrastructure protection plans, asset prioritizing, and
a response procedure to ensure early detection and effective
City of
Mound
TBD Varies
by year
July 2024 In
progress
5 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
207
response to storm, outage, and flood events to minimize inundation,
risk, and property damage.
Objective 7D: Continue to maintain a Debris Management Plan
7D1 Develop City of Mound overlay plan to supplement the Lakes Area
EOP and Resource Manuals.
City of
Mound EM
N/A Ongoing In
progress
2 1
Objective 7E: Preplan and Prepare for both man‐made and natural disasters within the Community.
7E1 Develop and maintain an incident Resource List of suppliers and
contractors that can quickly respond to assist in time of need or
crisis.
City of
Mound EM
N/A December
2024
Complete
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A: Increase awareness of assistance programs offered by county and local non‐profit organizations
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
8A1 Focus on low‐income housing complexes, and assisted living
facilities to identify those in need, to provide information and
connect people with available resources such as churches, food shelf
and thrift shops
City of
Mound EM
N/A Ongoing In
progress
3 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A: Ensure continued compliance and participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
9A1 Community to adopt and enforce a floodplain management
ordinance to reduce future flood risks.
City of
Mound
N/A Ongoing In
progress
1 1
9A2 Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program. City of
Mound
N/A Ongoing In
progress
2 1
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more resistant to
failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A: Partner with local communications providers to ensure continuity of operations during a natural disaster
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
10A1 Reach out to our local communication providers to formulate a plan
to maintain our continuity of operations during severe weather
events and other natural disasters.
City of
Mound EM
N/A December
2024
In
progress
3 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
208
Mound 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Develop and Implement a basic “Hazard Assessment – Risk Reduction Plan” to circumvent loss
of life, injuries, or disasters
Project Title/Action 1A1: Require Proper utility locates are completed per city ordinance and
state laws
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1A2: Designate and/or create storm shelters within the community, and
communicate to public
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency City of Mound Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1B: Maintain or replace warning sirens on a regular basis or as necessary to insure siren
functionality and effectiveness
Project Title/Action 1B1: Replace two (2) outdoor warning sirens that were installed in 1987:
due to age, system failures, and normal life expectancy
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1B2: Ensure all outdoor warning sirens have a back‐up power source (I.e.:
battery or solar power back‐up system)
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1B3: Continue to monitor outdoor warning siren test results to identify and
required maintenance needs
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City of Mound Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1C: Ensure that all the essential city first responders have the current version of the Emergency
Response Guidebooks (ERG)
Project Title/Action 1C1: Distribute ERG guidebooks when the updated version is received from
Hennepin County and ensure responders are well trained on use of ERG
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Mound Fire Department
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Maintain the city of Mound Weather Ready Nation Ambassador program and increase public
knowledge and awareness regarding Severe Weather Risks
Project Title/Action 2A1: Continue to promote Weather Ready ideals of awareness, outreach,
and preparation
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 2A2: Continue to promote the use of NOAA Weather Radios in all
government‐owned facilities, childcare centers, and in facilities with
vulnerable populations
Project Status Canceled
Project Title/Action 2A3: Continue to take steps toward achieving Storm Ready Community
Certification
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency City of Mound Emergency Management
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
209
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Maintain the city of Mound operation of a mass‐notification system
Project Title/Action 2B1: Continue to promote enrollment in the city of Mound mass‐
notification system
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 2B2: Continue to utilize newsletters, social media, and other outreach
program methods to inform the public about life safety risks and pre‐
emptive actions related to weather emergencies
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 2B3: Expand the use of the existing city mass notification system to include
all‐hazards and Weather Ready information
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Mound Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Assure continued compliance with the city’s policy on preservation of indigenous burial
mounds.
Project Title/Action 3A1: Continue to require all projects occurring on known indigenous sites
to have approval from the state archeologist prior to work beginning.
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Mound Community Development Department
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Assess community for potential hazards and identification of greatest risk
Project Title/Action 4A1: Promote community wide (citizen) participation in threat and hazard
identification and risk assessment process
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 4A2: Promote the use of the Calculated Priority Risk Index formula to
prioritize identified threats and hazards
Project Status Anticipated completion date: July 2024
Responsible Agency City of Mound Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Promote the use of the WebEOC for communication tool within Hennepin County, for relay of
information to local, state, and federal agencies
Project Title/Action 5A1: Conduct WebEOC training sessions for key staff
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 5A2: Continue to review and update our equipment capabilities in the
WebEOC database, as required
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Mound Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 5B: Ensure all first responders radio equipment is ARMER compatible
Project Title/Action 5B1: Continue to replace obsolete or non‐supported handheld and console
radios for all first responders as required
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Mound Fire Department
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
210
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Provide for compliant development to ensure that new or remodeled commercial and
residential structures are designed and built to the current state codes, i.e., building code, electrical code, and
fire code
Project Title/Action 6A1: Continue to adopt and enforce the applicable codes, i.e., Minnesota
State Codes and International Property Maintenance Code
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 6A2: Enforce zoning, floodplain, permitting, building, and fire code
compliance on development
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 6A3: Continue to utilize building official in the issuance of required permits
and inspections
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 6A4: Review and update city building, and zoning codes as required
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Mound Community Development Department
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Advocate for the jurisdictional infrastructure improvements that eliminate or reduces life
safety threats caused by severe weather or other natural disaster type hazards
Project Title/Action 7A1: Bury power lines whenever possible and as practical to reduce the
potential for life safety hazards
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 7A2: Improve roads, road elevation levels, and retaining walls to assure
roadway access for emergency response vehicles and others that are
providing basic core services
Project Statuso Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Mound Public Works Department
OBJECTIVE: 7B: Develop and maintain a Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Renewal Plan
Project Title/Action 7B1: Renew and properly size pump and force main components to ensure
better coordination of system demand
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 7B2: Install or maintain permanent on‐site back‐up power system to
prevent back flow and back‐up of black water during high flow and storm
events
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Mound Public Works Department
OBJECTIVE: 7C: Develop and Implement a storm, surface water, and flood response plan
Project Title/Action 7C1: Develop critical infrastructure protection plans, asset prioritizing, and
a response procedure to ensure early detection and effective response to
storm, outage, and flood events to minimize inundation, risk, and property
damage
Project Status Anticipated completion date: July 2024
Responsible Agency City of Mound Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 7D: Continue to maintain a Debris Management Plan
Project Title/Action 7D1: Develop City of Mound overlay plan to supplement the Lakes Area
EOP and Resource Manuals
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Mound Emergency Management
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
211
OBJECTIVE: 7E: Preplan and Prepare for both man‐made and natural disasters within the Community
Project Title/Action 7E1: Develop and Maintain a prearranged incident Resource List of
suppliers and contractors that can quickly respond to assist in time of need
or crisis
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City of Mound Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 8A: Increase awareness of assistance programs offered by county and local non‐profit
organizations
Project Title/Action 8A1: Focus on low‐income housing complexes, and assisted living facilities
to identify those in need, to provide information and connect people with
available resources such as churches, food shelf and thrift shops
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Mound Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 9A: Ensure continued compliance and participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
Project Title/Action 9A1: Community to adopt and enforce a floodplain management ordinance
to reduce future flood risks
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 9A2: Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Mound Community Development Department
OBJECTIVE: 10A: Partner with local communications providers to ensure continuity of operations during a
natural disaster
Project Title/Action 10A: Reach out to our local communication providers to formulate a plan
to maintain our continuity of operations during severe weather events and
other natural disasters.
Project Status Anticipated completion date: December 2024
Responsible Agency City of Mound Emergency Management
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
212
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
213
3.3.31. MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
214
2024 MSP Airport Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
MSP Airport does not independently qualify for mitigation funding and coordinates with the jurisdictions it falls within to pursue mitigation
projects as a sub applicant.
MSP Airport 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
MSP Airport does not independently qualify for mitigation funding and coordinates with the jurisdictions it falls within to pursue mitigation
projects as a sub applicant.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
215
3.3.32. CITY OF NEW HOPE
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
216
2024 New Hope Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Increase Hail Risk Awareness
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priorit
y
Funding
Sources
1A1 Mail brochures with water bills. City Admin $590 Annually Canceled Low 1
1A2 Post warnings at parks and public buildings. Parks Dept. $193 Ongoing Canceled Low 1
1A3 Social Media IT Dept. $240/year Annually Ongoing Low 1
Objective 1B: Lightning: Protect Critical Facilities and Equipment from Lightning.
1B1 Install lightning protection devices. Public Works 20K Ongoing Ongoing Low 1, 4, 5
1B2 Install surge protection EM Undetermined 6 Months Ongoing Low 1
Objective 1C: Protect Power Lines and Infrastructure from Severe Winds.
1C1 Establish standards for all utilities regarding tree
pruning around lines.
Utilities Dept. 0 Annually Ongoing Low 1
1C2 Continue to trim Boulevard trees Utilities Dept. 3K Annually Ongoing Low 1
Objective 1D: Protect Public Buildings and Infrastructure from Extreme Winter Weather.
1D1 Add insulation to walls and attics Public Works 40K Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1D2 Retrofit buildings to withstand snow loads and
prevent roof collapse
City
Engineering
EST Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 1E: Extreme Winter Weather: Assist Vulnerable Populations.
1E1 Identify specific at‐risk populations PD/FD 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1E2 Organize outreach programs. PD/FD 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 1F: Protect Power Lines from Extreme Winter Weather.
1F1 Bury existing power lines when possible. Utilities Dept. Unknown Ongoing Ongoing Low 1, 4
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Extreme Cold: Educate property owners about freezing pipes.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priorit
y
Funding
Sources
2A1 Educate homeowners and builders on how to
protect their pipes, including locating water pipes on
the inside of the building insulation or keeping them
out of attics, crawl spaces and outside walls.
Community
Development
$500 Annually Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
217
2A2 Educate homeowners that letting a faucet drip
during extreme cold weather can prevent the
buildup of excessive pressure in the pipe and avoid
bursting.
Community
Development
0 Annually Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2B: Conduct Lightning Awareness Programs
2B1 Post warning signs at parks and public buildings. Parks and Rec 2K Ongoing Canceled Low 1
Objective 2C: Increase Severe Wind Risk Awareness
2C1 Inform residents of shelter locations. Parks and Rec $200 Ongoing Canceled Low 1
2C2 Ensure school district is aware of the best area of
refuge in their buildings.
PD/FD 0 Annual Delayed Low 1
Objective 2D: Conduct Winter Weather Risk Awareness Activities
2D1 Inform the public about severe winter weather
impacts.
Utilities $200 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2E: Conduct Tornado Awareness Activities
2E1 Educate citizens through media outlets. Billing 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2E2 Conduct tornado drills at schools and public
buildings.
Parks and Rec 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2F: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness.
2F1 Develop and implement a multi‐hazard public
awareness program.
West Metro
Fire/HSEM
1K 6 Months Delayed 1 1
Objective 2G: Perform Home Safety Inspections
2G1 Maintain an in‐home inspection program promoting
fire safety.
FD 8K Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2G2 Install smoke detectors and CO detectors in homes. FD $500 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2H: Create a severe weather awareness campaign for citizens that covers sirens information, NOAA Weather Radios, How the
National Weather Service issues warnings and the hazards that affect Hennepin County.
2H1 Distribute info via variety media sources IT 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2I: Educate the community on recreational fires and prohibit open burning.
2I1 Make recreational fire regulations readily available
to community.
FD 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2I2 Use local media to increase awareness. FD 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
218
Objective 3A: Continue to use Surface Water Management Plan approved by both the Bassett Creek and Shingle Creek Water Management
Commissions.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priorit
y
Funding
Sources
3A1 Submit development plans for review Community
Development
0 6 Months Ongoing Low 1
Objective 3B: Monitor Water Supply
3B1 Regularly check for leaks to minimize water supply
losses.
Public Works 10K Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
3B2 Improve water supply monitoring. Utilities Dept. 3K Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
3B3 Replace/ Upgrade water pipes in conjunction with
street projects
City
Management
City Planning Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Improve Storm Water Management Planning
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priorit
y
Funding
Sources
4A1 Complete storm water drainage study for known
problem areas.
Public Works 20K 6 Months Complete
4A2 Prepare and adopt a storm water drainage plan and
ordinance.
Commercial
Dev
0 6 Months Complete
4A3 Replace/ Upgrade sewer and storm system in
conjunction with street projects
Public Works Varies 6 Months Complete
Objective 4B: Join or Improve Compliance with National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
4B1 Participating in NFIP Community
Development
0 6 Months Delayed Low 1
4B2 Adopt ordinances that meet minimum Federal and
State requirements to comply with NFIP.
Community
Development
0 6 Months Delayed Low 1
Objective 4C: Improve Storm Water Drainage System Capacity
4C1 Increase the capacity of storm drainage system. Utilities Varies Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
4C2 Install rain gardens to slow runoff and improve
water quality
Engineering Varies Ongoing Ongoing Low 1, 5
4C3 Continue with the established sewer maintenance
program of jetting pipes.
Public Works 10K Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 4D: Reduce Extreme Winter Weather impact to Roadways
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
219
4D1 Plan for and maintain adequate road and debris
clearing capabilities.
Public Works 0 6 Months Delayed Low 1
Objective 4E: Assess Overall Community Risk, Identify Target Hazards in Community
4E1 Obtain local data, list all properties that have the
potential greatest impact on community safety.
Include public buildings, private business, places of
gathering, and other locations, maintain the
database
FD 0 Delayed Delayed Low 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Update local emergency plans as needed and work with neighboring cities on their plan
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priorit
y
Funding
Sources
5A1 Meet with neighboring cities about emergency plans
(each department)
City Managers 0 6 Months Complete
5A2 Establish Joint EOC West metro,
Both Cities
100K 6 Months Complete
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Incorporate Flood Mitigation in Local Planning
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priorit
y
Funding
Sources
6A1 Mitigating hazards during infrastructure planning. Commercial
Dev
0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
6A2 Obtaining easements for planned and regulated
public use of privately‐owned land for temporary
water retention and drainage
Commercial
Dev
0 5 Years In
progress
Low 1
Objective 6B: Adopt and Enforce Building Codes to protect against extreme winter weather
6B1 Adopt International Building Code and International
Residential Code.
Inspections 0 Ongoing Complete
Objective 6C: Map and Assess Vulnerability to Subsidence
6C1 Use GIS to map areas that are susceptible to
subsidence.
LOGIS/County $500 4 Months Delayed Low 1
Objective 6D: Ensure building compliance inspections are conducted on new construction projects.
6D1 Review sites On Scheduled basis Inspections Staff Hours Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
220
6D2 Update and enforce zoning ordinances Inspections Staff Hours Annual Ongoing Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Create evacuation plan for a railroad emergency
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priorit
y
Funding
Sources
7A1 Determine a 1/2mile path on either side of the rail
line.
County‐GIS 1K 1 Month Complete
7A2 Educate the community on the evacuation plan. Billing 1K Months Complete
Objective 7B: Identify businesses in the community that have hazardous processes and/or materials.
7B1 Pre plan businesses with inspections. FD 0 Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priorit
y
Funding
Sources
8A1 Identify underserved communities, vulnerable
populations, and those with access and functional
needs
HCEM/City Staff time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priorit
y
Funding
Sources
9A1 Leverage existing and future infrastructure plans to
identify opportunities for mitigation efforts
Public Works Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing 2 1
9A2 Leverage grant opportunities to expand mitigation
components on existing programmed projects
Public Works Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priorit
y
Funding
Sources
10A1 Continue routine maintenance of critical
infrastructure
Public Works Undetermined Continuou
s
Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
221
New Hope 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Increase Hail Risk Awareness
Project Title/Action 1A1: Mail brochures with water bills
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency City Admin
Project Title/Action 1A2: Post warnings at parks and public buildings
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Parks Dept
Project Title/Action 1A3: social media
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency IT Dept
OBJECTIVE: 1B Lightning: Protect Critical Facilities and Equipment from Lightning
Project Title/Action 1B1: Install lightning protection devices
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency Public Works
Project Title/Action 1B2: Install surge protection
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Public Works
OBJECTIVE: 1C: Protect Power Lines and Infrastructure from Severe Winds
Project Title/Action 1C1: establish standards for all utilities regarding tree pruning around lines
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Utilities Dept
Project Title/Action 1C2: Continue to trim Boulevard trees
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Utilities Dept
OBJECTIVE: 1D: Protect Public Buildings and Infrastructure from Extreme Winter Weather
Project Title/Action 1D1: Add insulation to walls and attics
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Public Works
Project Title/Action 1D2: Retrofit buildings to withstand snow loads and prevent roof collapse
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City Eng.
OBJECTIVE: 1E: Extreme Winter Weather Assist Vulnerable Populations
Project Title/Action 1E1: Identify specific at‐risk populations
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency PD/FD
Project Title/Action 1E2: Organize outreach programs
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency PD/FD
OBJECTIVE: 1F: Protect Power Lines from Extreme Winter Weather
Project Title/Action 1F1: Bury existing power lines when possible
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Utilities Dept
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
222
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Extreme Cold: Educate property owners about freezing pipes
Project Title/Action 2A1: Educate homeowners and builders on how to protect their pipes,
including locating water pipes on the inside of the building insulation or
keeping them out of attics, crawl spaces and outside walls
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Community Development
Project Title/Action 2A2: Educate homeowners that letting a faucet drip during extreme cold
weather can prevent the buildup of excessive pressure in the pipe and
avoid bursting
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Community Development
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Conduct Lightning Awareness Programs
Project Title/Action 2B1: Post warning signs at parks and public buildings
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Park and Rec
OBJECTIVE: 2C: Increase Severe Wind Risk Awareness
Project Title/Action 2C1: Inform residents of shelter locations
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency Parks and Recreation
Project Title/Action 2C2: Ensure school district is aware of the best area of refuge in their
building
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency PD/FD
OBJECTIVE: 2D: Conduct Winter Weather Risk Awareness Actives
Project Title/Action 2D1: Inform the public about severe winter weather impacts
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Utilities
OBJECTIVE: 2E: Conduct Tornado Awareness Activities
Project Title/Action 2E1: Educate citizens through media outlets
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Billing
Project Title/Action 2E2: Conduct tornado drills at schools and public buildings
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Parks and Rec
OBJECTIVE: 2F: Increase Hazard Education and Risk Awareness
Project Title/Action 2F1: Develop and implement a multi‐hazard public awareness program
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency West Metro Fire/HSEM
OBJECTIVE: 2G: Perform Home Safety Inspections
Project Title/Action 2G1: Maintain an in‐home inspection program promoting fire safety
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency FD
Project Title/Action 2G2: Install smoke detectors and CO detectors in homes
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency FD
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
223
OBJECTIVE: 2H: Create a severe weather awareness campaign for citizens that covers sirens information,
NOAA Weather Radios, How the National Weather Service issues warnings and the hazards that affect
Hennepin County
Project Title/Action 2H1: Distribute info via variety media sources
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency IT
OBJECTIVE: 2I: Educate the community on recreational fires and prohibit open burning
Project Title/Action 2I1: Make recreational fire regulations readily available to community
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency FD
Project Title/Action 2I2: Use local media to increase awareness
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency FD
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Continue to use Surface Water Management Plan approved by both the Bassett Creek and
Shingle Creek Water Management Commissions
Project Title/Action 3A1: Submit development plans for review
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Community Development
OBJECTIVE: 3B: Monitor Water Supply
Project Title/Action 3B1: Regularly check for leaks to minimize water supply losses
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Public Works
Project Title/Action 3B2: Improve water supply monitoring
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Utilities Dept
Project Title/Action 3B3: Replace/Upgrade water pipes in conjunction with street projects
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City Management
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Improve Storm Water Management Planning
Project Title/Action 4A1: Complete storm water drainage study for known problem areas
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public Works
Project Title/Action 4A2: Prepare and adopt a storm water drainage plan and ordinance
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Commercial Dev
Project Title/Action 4A3: Replace/Upgrade sewer and storm system in conjunction with street
projects
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Public Works
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
224
OBJECTIVE: 4B: Join or Improve Compliance with National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
Project Title/Action 4B1: participating in NFIP
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Community Development
Project Title/Action 4B2: Adopt ordinances that meet minimum Federal and State requirements
to comply with NFIP
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Community Development
OBJECTIVE: 4C: Improve Storm Water Drainage System Capacity
Project Title/Action 4C1: Increase the capacity of storm drainage system
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Utilities
Project Title/Action 4C2: Install rain gardens to slow runoff and improve water quality
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Engineering
Project Title/Action 4C3: Continue with the established sewer maintenance program of jetting
pipes
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Public Works
OBJECTIVE: 4D: Reduce Extreme Winter Weather impact to Roadways
Project Title/Action 4D1: Plan for and maintain adequate road and debris clearing capabilities
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Public Works
OBJECTIVE: 4E: Assess Overall Community Risk, Identify Target Hazards in Community
Project Title/Action 4E1: Obtain local data, list all properties that have the potential greatest
impact on community safety. Include public buildings, private business,
places of gathering, and other locations, maintain the database
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency FD
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Update local emergency plans as needed and work with neighboring cities on their plan
Project Title/Action 5A1: Meet with neighboring cities about emergency plans (each
department)
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City Managers
Project Title/Action 5A2: Establish Joint EOC
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency West Metro, Both Cities
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Incorporate Flood Mitigation in Local Planning
Project Title/Action 6A1: Mitigating hazards during infrastructure planning
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Commercial Dev
Project Title/Action 6A2: Obtaining easements for planned and regulated public use of
privately‐owned land for temporary water retention and drainage
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Commercial Dev
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
225
OBJECTIVE: 6B: Adopt and Enforce Building Codes to protect against extreme winter weather
Project Title/Action 6B1: Adopt International Building Code and International Residential Code
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Inspections
OBJECTIVE: 6C: Map and Assess Vulnerability to Subsidence
Project Title/Action 6C1: Use GIS to map areas that are susceptible to subsidence
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency LOGIS/County
OBJECTIVE: 6D: Ensure building compliance inspections are conducted on new construction projects
Project Title/Action 6D1: Review sites on scheduled basis
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Inspections
Project Title/Action 6D2: Update and enforce zoning ordinances
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Inspections
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Create evacuation plan for a railroad emergency
Project Title/Action 7A1: Determine a ½ mile path on either side of the rail line
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency County‐GIS
Project Title/Action 7A2: Educate the community on the evacuation plan
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Billing
OBJECTIVE: 7B: Identify businesses in the community that have hazardous processes and/or materials
Project Title/Action 7B1: Pre plan businesses with inspections
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency FD
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
226
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
227
3.3.33. CITY OF ORONO
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
228
2024 Orono Mitigation Goals/Objectives/Actions/Strategy/Priority Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Flooding: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to flooding
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐prone
areas
City of
Orono
Staff
Time
2024‐2028 Ongoing 5 1
1A2 Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program City of
Orono
Staff
Time
2024‐2028 Ongoing 4 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Work with Chamber of Commerce, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in local community.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles
and practices
City of
Orono
Staff
Time
2024‐2028 Ongoing 6 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Establish Multi‐Jurisdictional partnership to reduce runoff
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Work with the local watersheds to continue to protect our lakes and
streams for future water quality
City of
Orono
20K 2024‐2028 Ongoing 3 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses, Non‐
Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Continue to meet the State and Federal regulations with the
protection plan
City of
Orono
Staff
Time
2024‐2028 Ongoing 2 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
229
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Build and support local capacity and commitment to become less vulnerable to hazards
Objective 7A: Bury Power Lines
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work with the community to identify power lines that could be
buried to reduce power failures in heavily populated areas
City of
Orono
100K 2024‐2028 Ongoing 1 1, 4, 5
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more resistant to
failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
230
Orono 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Flooding: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses
due to flooding
Project Title/Action 1A1: Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐prone
areas
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 1A2: Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Orono
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Work with Chamber of Commerce, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard
mitigation in local community
Project Title/Action 2A1: Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles
and practices
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Orono
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Establish Multi‐Jurisdictional partnership to reduce runoff
Project Title/Action 3A1: Work with the local watersheds to continue to protect our lakes and
streams for future water quality
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Orono Public Works
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Project Title/Action 5A1: Continue to meet the State and Federal regulations with the
protection plan
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Orono Public Works
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury Power Lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work with the community to identify power lines that could be buried
to reduce power failures in heavily populated areas
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Orono Public Works
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
231
3.3.34. CITY OF OSSEO
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
232
2024 Osseo Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Continue to educate the public using several safety programs
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Work in purchasing material that can be sent to residents and using
both Police and Fire
City of
Osseo
500 Ongoing Ongoing 1 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses, Non‐
Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Generator at City Hall/Police Department
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
233
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more resistant to
failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
234
Osseo 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Continue to educate the public using several safety programs
Project Title/Action 2A1: Work in purchasing material that can be sent to residents and using
both Police and Fire
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency City of Osseo
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Generator at City Hall/Police Department
Project Title/Action 6A1: Have generator installed at City Hall/Police Department to operate
E.O.C
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City of Osseo
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
235
3.3.35. CITY OF PLYMOUTH
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
236
2024 Plymouth Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Flooding/Dam Failure: develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to flooding and dam
failure.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Update inundation map every 10 years (FEMW map panes) Engineering Personnel
Time
10 Years Ongoing 1 1
1A2 Review and compare existing flood control standards, zoning,
and building requirements
Engineering Personnel
Time
6 Months Ongoing 2 1
1A3 Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐
prone areas
Engineering Personnel
Time
6 Months Ongoing 3 1
1A4 Periodically exercise flood/dam failure response actions Engineering Personnel
Time
8 Months Ongoing Low 1
1A5 Update flood prone area mitigation protocol Engineering Personnel
Time
3 Months Ongoing Low 1
1A6 Implement capital improvement program projects intended to
reduce/alienate flood potential
Engineering Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1, 5
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard
mitigation actions
Communication
s
Personnel
Time
Ongoing On
Schedule
Low 1
2A2 Provide information to the public on the city website and
through public education opportunities
Communication
s
Personnel
Time
Ongoing On
Schedule
Low 1
Objective: 2B: Promote partnerships between the state, counties, local jurisdictions, and partner agencies to identify, prioritize and implement
mitigation actions
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2B1 Participate as a member in local or regional hazard mitigation
planning group
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing On
Schedule
Low 1
2B2 Support or provide the public sector events, workshop,
symposium, and continued education opportunities
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Delayed Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
237
Objective 2C: Work with Chamber of Commerce, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in local community
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2C1 Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation
principles and practices
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing On
Schedule
Low 1
2C2 Encourage businesses to develop and implement hazard
mitigation actions
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing On
Schedule
Low 1
2C3 Support or provide the private sector events, workshop,
symposium, and continued education opportunities
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing On
Schedule
Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Promote continued maintenance and management practices of water resources, green space
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Update and review City Park / Recreation and Community
Development policies to ensure continued best practices
Engineering Personnel
Time
6 Months On
Schedule
Low 1
3A2 Maintain wetland and natural resource inventories Water
Resources
Personnel
Time
Ongoing On
Schedule
Low 1
Objective: 3B: Promote maintenance and management of historic locations and buildings within the city
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3B1 Update and review any plans and budgetary resources to
maintain and promote the identified historic locations of the
city
Parks and
Recreation
Personnel
Time
Ongoing On
Schedule
Low 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: To assess specific geographical areas within the City that are predisposed to natural disasters and or man‐made hazardous situations,
both of which could be responsible for financial and/or personal impact or loss of life
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Annually review and update the City Risk / Threat Assessment
document and distribute the new version to the City Manager
all City Division Directors
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
3 Months On
Schedule
Low 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses, Non‐
Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Ensure effective partnerships with other public safety agencies
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
238
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Continue the promotion of partnerships with federal, state, and
local entities to develop successful mitigation plans and
operational strategies. Work towards a common
comprehensive emergency operation plan that can be utilized
on a larger regional platform.
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
5A2 Continue participation in multi‐jurisdictional / multi‐agency
tabletop, drill, and full‐scale exercises
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
5A3 Research and implement lessons learned from actual hazardous
events from local, regional, and national jurisdictions to avoid
probable mistakes from repeating themselves
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Reduce the risk factor of private business, family, and public structures in addition to at risk populations
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Use risk assessment modeling tools and resources / statistical
information to determine the highest risk areas in order to
avoid overpopulation or injection of at‐risk groups like children
or the elderly in pre‐identified high risk hazardous locations
Parks and
Recreation
Personnel
Time
1 Year On
Schedule
Low 1
6A2 The Plymouth Community Development Department will
continue to ensure that building permits and codes are current
or exceed industry standards
Parks and
Recreation
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
6A3 The Plymouth Park and Recreation Department will give
concentrated consideration of not developing park areas near
pre‐identified high risk hazardous locations
Parks and
Recreation
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Develop community stakeholders in mitigation strategies by use of local resources
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Encourage and continue development of CERT Teams and
Neighborhood Watch groups to assist in citizens to be self‐
reliant and responsible for their own safety measures lessening
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
239
the burden on the local government so a more concentrated
effort can be placed on the execution of COOP plans
7A2 Continue to monitor and document the completion of
mandatory NIMS training necessary for national compliance
standards
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more resistant to
failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
240
Plymouth 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Flooding/Dam Failure: develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of
damage and losses due to flooding and dam failure
Project Title/Action 1A1: Update inundation map every 10 years (FEMW map panes)
Project Status On Schedule
Project Title/Action 1A2: Review and compare existing flood control standards, zoning, and
building requirements
Project Status On Schedule
Project Title/Action 1A3: Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐prone
areas
Project Status On Schedule
Project Title/Action 1A4: Periodically exercise flood/dam failure response actions
Project Status On Schedule
Project Title/Action 1A5: Update flood prone area mitigation protocol
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1A6: Implement capital improvement program projects intended to
reduce/alienate flood potential
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Eng./Water Resource
OBJECTIVE: 1B: Wild land fire: Develop a comprehensive approach reducing the possibility of damage and
losses due to wildfire
Project Title/Action 1B1: Develop and publicize evacuation plans and routes in areas
threatened by wild land fires, as resources are available
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 1B2: Ensure defensible fire‐fighting space is afforded adjacent to wild land
and open space areas in new developments, as resources are available
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency Fire
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions
Project Title/Action 2A1: Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard
mitigation actions
Project Status On Schedule
Project Title/Action 2A2: Provide information to the public on the city website and through
public education opportunities
Project Status On Schedule
Responsible Agency Communications
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Promote partnerships between the state, counties, local jurisdictions, and partner agencies to
identify, prioritize and implement mitigation actions
Project Title/Action 2B1: Participate as a member in local or regional hazard mitigation
planning group
Project Status On Schedule
Summary of Project Ongoing participation in Hennepin County‐ NSEMPG (North Suburban
Emergency Management Planning Group)
Project Title/Action 2B2: Support or provide the public sector events, workshop, symposium,
and continued education opportunities
Project Status Delayed
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
241
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2C: Work with Chamber of Commerce, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard
mitigation in local community
Project Title/Action 2C1: Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles
and practices
Project Status On Schedule
Project Title/Action 2C2: Encourage businesses to develop and implement hazard mitigation
actions
Project Status On Schedule
Project Title/Action 2C3: Support or provide the private sector events, workshop, symposium,
and continued education opportunities
Project Status On Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Promote continued maintenance and management practices of water resources, green space
Project Title/Action 3A1: Update and review City Park / Recreation and Community
Development policies to ensure continued best practices
Project Status On Schedule
Project Title/Action 3A2: Maintain wetland and natural resource inventories
Project Status On Schedule
Responsible Agency Engineering and Water Resources
OBJECTIVE: 3B: Promote maintenance and management of historic locations and buildings within the city
Project Title/Action 3B1: Update and review any plans and budgetary resources to maintain
and promote the identified historic locations of the city
Project Status On Schedule
Responsible Agency Park and Recreation
OBJECTIVE: 4A: To assess specific geographical areas within the City that are predisposed to natural disasters
and or man‐made hazardous situations, both of which could be responsible for financial and/or personal
impact or loss of life
Project Title/Action 4A1: Annually review and update the City Risk / Threat Assessment
document and distribute the new version to the City Manager all City
Division Directors
Project Status On Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Continue the promotion of partnerships with federal, state, and local entities to develop
successful mitigation plans and operational strategies. Work towards a common comprehensive emergency
operation plan that can be utilized on a larger regional platform.
Project Title/Action 5A1: Continue affording the opportunity for Plymouth City Staff to attend
or join emergency management associations like NSEMPG (North Suburban
Emergency Management Planning Group), MEMA (Metropolitan
Emergency Managers Association) and AMEM (Association of Minnesota
Emergency Managers)
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 5A2: Continue participation in multi‐jurisdictional / multi‐agency tabletop,
drill, and full‐scale exercises
Project Status Ongoing
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
242
Project Title/Action 5A3: Research and implement lessons learned from actual hazardous
events from local, regional, and national jurisdictions to avoid probable
mistakes from repeating themselves
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Reduce the risk factor of private business, family, and public structures in addition to at risk
populations
Project Title/Action 6A1: Use risk assessment modeling tools and resources / statistical
information to determine the highest risk areas in order to avoid
overpopulation or injection of at‐risk groups like children or the elderly in
pre‐identified high risk hazardous locations
Project Status On Schedule
Project Title/Action 6A2: The Plymouth Community Development Department will continue to
ensure that building permits and codes are current or exceed industry
standards
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 6A3: The Plymouth Park and Recreation Department will give concentrated
consideration of not developing park areas near pre‐identified high risk
hazardous locations
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Parks and Recreation
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Develop community stakeholders in mitigation strategies by use of local resources
Project Title/Action 7A1: Encourage and continue development of CERT Teams and
Neighborhood Watch groups to assist in citizens to be self‐reliant and
responsible for their own safety measures lessening the burden on the
local government so a more concentrated effort can be placed on the
execution of COOP plans
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 7A2: Continue to monitor and document the completion of mandatory
NIMS training necessary for national compliance standards
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
243
3.3.36. CITY OF RICHFIELD
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
244
2024 Richfield Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Assess and upgrade the City/County warning system
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Creating a schedule to replace warning
siren systems within next 7 years
Police 100K Long Complete
1A2 Update our evacuation and sheltering
plans for Municipal buildings in 1 year
EM / Fire / Police / Exec. 500 Long Complete
1A3 Update our Emergency Operations Center
(EOC) concerning technology in 1 year.
Tabletop exercise and activation of EOC
within 1 year.
EM / All Depts. 1K Short Complete
1A4 Perform exercises to test the various
components of the EOC within 1 year
EM/All Depts. 1K Short Complete
1A5 Develop more information to
warn/mitigate disasters on our social
media in 6 months
Police/Exe 200 Short Complete
1A6 Use of our EVERBRIDGE system to warn
residents of hazardous weather or man‐
made hazards
Police 300 Long Complete
Objective 1B: Maintain Links to other sources of reliable information about infectious disease response, including quarantine
1B1 Maintain Contracts with Bloomington
Public Health for ongoing services
BPH / Police / City Gov. 200 Short Ongoing Low 1
1B2 Provide educational material along with
the location of vaccination clinics to
employees and the public.
EM / Police / BPH 1K Medium Ongoing Low 1
1B3 Working with our diverse community
through community outreach groups on
educational material regarding
vaccinations and illnesses.
EM / Police / Fire / JCCP 1.5K Short Ongoing 1 1
1B4 Review and Update Emergency Response
Pandemic Plan Protocols.
All depts./BPH 1K Short Complete
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
245
Objective 2A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions.
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Publicize and encourage the adoption of
appropriate hazard mitigation actions.
EM / Police / Fire 500 Short Ongoing 2 1
2A2 Provide information to the public on the
city website and through public education
opportunities
EM / Police 500 Short Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2B: Promote partnerships between the state, counties, local jurisdictions, and partner agencies to identify, prioritize, and
implement mitigation actions.
2B1 Participate as a member in local or
regional hazard mitigation planning group
Police/Fire 500 Short Complete
2B2 Support or provide the public sector
events, workshop, symposium, and
continued education opportunities.
EM / Police / Fire 1.5K Long Complete 3 1
Objective 2C: Work with Chamber of Commerce, businesses and other local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in local community.
2C1 Increase awareness and knowledge of
hazard mitigation principles and practices
EM / Police / Fire 2K Medium Ongoing Low 1
2C2 Encourage businesses to develop and
implement hazard mitigation actions
EM / Police / Fire 1K Medium Ongoing Low 1
2C3 Ensure that Police and Fire have the latest
edition of the Emergency Response
Guidebook
EM / Police / Fire 500 Long Complete
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
3A1 Work with the Park and Recreation and
Public Works on maintenance of parks and
other natural resources
Police/ParkRec/PW 25K Long Ongoing Low 1
3A2 Ensure that DNR requirements are being
met with improvements to Natural
wetlands and DNR regulations
Police/ParkRec/PW 5K Long Ongoing Low 1, 2
3A3 Meet with the Richfield Historical Society
to mitigate Historical and Cultural assets
within the community from natural
disasters
EM/ParkRec/Richfield
Historical Society
2K Long Ongoing Low 1, 5
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
246
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Create a strategy to work with private industry and businesses to identify locations of hazardous materials
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Meet with Hazardous material producers
to review state and federal guidelines
EM / Police / Fire / Bus 1.2K Medium Complete
4A2 Receive updated emergency operations
plans for private industry on their
protocols responding to Hazardous
material incidents
EM / Police / Fire / Bus 500 Short Ongoing Low 1
4A3 Receive updated locations of where
Hazardous materials are stored on site.
EM / Police / Fire / Bus 800 Short Complete
Objective 4B: Share SARA information with other city departments through ACTIVE 911 App.
4B1 Have access through the Fire Department
to other ACTIVE 911 User to receive the
SARA information overlay for other
departments specifically police.
Police/Fire 500 Short Complete
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Increase coordination with the State Duty Officer for Highway spills
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Work with the Fire Department and Public
works on spill protocols
EM / Police / Fire 700 Medium Complete
5A2 Update information with State Duty
Officer
EM / Police / Fire 500 Short Complete
Objective 5B: Maintain and Update plan to contact Utility Companies
5B1 Provide contact information for City
personnel to Utility Companies
EM / Police / Fire 500 Medium Ongoing Low 1
Objective 5C: Active Shooter situation. Coordination and Training with all local, county, and state agencies
5C1 Continue to develop “Play Book” for active
shooter incidents.
EM / Police / Fire 1.5K Medium Complete
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
247
5C2 Continue to train with Fire Department
and other agencies in response protocols
and procedures.
EM / Police / Fire 1.5K Long Ongoing Low 1
5C3 Apply and receive grant funding to train
on a more regional basis.
EM / Police / Fire 1.5K Long Ongoing Low 1
5C4 Continue to work with the Business and
School Communities in response protocols
and procedures, review actions, and build
plans
Community/EM/Fire/Police 1.5K Medium Ongoing Low 1
Objective 5D: CERT Training and Regional Asset sharing of resources
5D1 Continue to recruit and train CERT
volunteers
EM / Police / Fire 3K Short Ongoing Low 1
5D2 Work with local jurisdictions on exercises
and events.
EM / Police / Fire 2K Long Ongoing Low 1
5D3 Apply and receive grant funding to offset
the cost of the CERT Program.
EM, CERT Admin, Regional
Partners
5K Long Ongoing Low 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Work in Partnership with Community Development on education contractors and new developers on Hazard Mitigation
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Review and implement, if possible,
changes in city ordinances
EM / Police / Fire 5K Long Ongoing Low 1
6A2 Conduct Study Sessions with City Council
on new development possibilities and
include Hazard Mitigation/Disaster
protocols
Attorney / CD / City Counsel 5K Long Ongoing Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Training for Police, Fire, and Public Works personnel in response protocols to hazards
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Update training protocols and plans for all
City departments on hazard response
including evacuation.
EM / Police / Fire / City 1.5K Long Ongoing Low 1
Objective 7B: Continue with Business CERT and TEEN CERT models in the community
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
248
7B1 Train more businesses in the CERT Model
and solicit more volunteers.
EM / Police / Fire / CERT /
Admin / Businesses / Park and
Rec
1.5K Long Ongoing Low 1
7B2 Continue to train TEEN CERT volunteers in
our community.
EM / Police / Fire / CERT /
Admin / Businesses / Park and
Rec
1.5K Long Ongoing Low 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A: Identify and Mitigate Public Health and City Services for the community
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
8A1 Continue to focus on direct service (WIC,
vaccines, breastfeeding education and
support, maternal‐child health, infectious
disease, heath promotion) this work will
build resilience in the underserved
populations in the city of Richfield through
Bloomington Public Health
Community/City/BPH $100K Long Ongoing 4 1
8A2 Our community health improvement
partnership work is addressing complex
health issues and aims to reverse health
and racial inequities. It does this by
partnering communities, public health
agencies, health systems, and clinics,
housing developers providers, spiritual,
faith and cultural communities, schools,
and human service organizations.
Community/City/BPH $100K Long Ongoing Low 1
8A3 Working on Language barriers within our
diverse population. Translating all city in
languages spoken in Richfield and
increasing our staff to mirror the diverse
population we serve
City Government $500K Long Ongoing Low 1
8A4 Working with Planners and developers on
affordable housing and programs to help
our diverse community find housing.
Community Development $500K Long Ongoing 5 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
249
8A5 Work with community organizations that
support and provide resources to our
disability community
City Government/Community $100K Long Ongoing Low 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A: Follow the established City Climate Control Plan
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
9A1 Develop and Promote Energy Efficiency
Efforts‐Understand City’s energy usage
and how to reduce it while helping the
environment.
City Government/Community $750K Long Ongoing Low 1
9A2 Promote Renewable Energy Installation
and Purchasing‐Reduce reliance on fossil
fuel derived energy and educate residents
and businesses on installation incentives
City Government $750K Long Ongoing Low 1
9A3 Encourage Sustainable Design and
Building Practices‐ ensure design and
construction plans integrate
environmental best practices and
amenities, making the buildings life cycle
more environmentally efficient.
City Government/Community $500K Long Ongoing Low 1
9A4 Strengthen and Expand Natural Resource
Management‐Inventory various natural
resources and include the public in
restoration and maintenance of trees,
parks, and bodies of water
City Government/Community $750K Long Ongoing Low 1
9A5 Reduce Waste Generated and Promote
Responsible Disposal‐ Understand how to
responsibly dispose of many different
goods and materials while promoting a
circular, low waste economy.
City Government/Community $500K Long Ongoing Low 1
9A6 Improve Access to Local Healthy Food‐
Increase convenient purchasing
City Government/Community $500K Long Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
250
opportunities and create more gardening
and food population opportunities.
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A: Multiple Hazards as it relates to critical infrastructure and the community
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
10A1 Assess Community Risk‐Developing and
maintaining a database to track
community vulnerability (i.e., exposure to
known hazard areas.)
City Government/Community $30K Medium Ongoing Low 1
10A2 Map Community Risk‐Obtaining hazard
data and using GIS to map various hazards
Public Works/Community
Development/EM/Community
$30K Medium Ongoing Low 1
10A3 Prevent Development in Hazard Areas‐
Purchasing land and title in the name of
local government to remove structures
and enforce permanent restrictions on
development.
Community Development $50K Medium Ongoing Low 1
10A4 Adopt Development Regulations in Hazard
Areas‐Evaluating the use of
performance/impact zoning to set risk‐
based standards for land development.
Community Development. $30K Long Ongoing Low 1
10A5 Limit Density in Hazard Areas‐Ensuring the
zoning ordinance encourages higher
densities only outside of known hazards.
Community Development $30K Long Ongoing Low 1
10A6 Create Local Funding Mechanisms for
Hazard Mitigation‐Establish a local reserve
fund for public mitigation measures.
City Government/Community
Development
$750K Long Ongoing Low 1
10A7 Monitor Mitigation Plan Implementation‐
Preparing a plan implementation
monitoring schedule and outlining roles
for those responsible for monitoring (i.e.
local departments, agencies, and
committees.)
City Government/Community
Development
$100K Long Ongoing 6 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
251
Richfield 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Assess and upgrade the City/County warning system
Project Title/Action 1A1: Creating a schedule to replace warning siren systems within next 7
years
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Richfield Police
Project Title/Action 1A2: Update our evacuation and sheltering plans for Municipal buildings in
1 year
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency EM/Fire/Police/Exec
Project Title/Action 1A3: Update our Emergency Operations Center (EOC) concerning
technology in 1 year. Tabletop exercise and activation of EOC within 1 year
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency EM/All Depts
Project Title/Action 1A4: Perform exercises to test the various components of the EOC within 1
year
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency EM/All Depts
Project Title/Action 1A5: Develop more information to warn/mitigate disasters on our social
media in 6 months
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Police/Exe
Project Title/Action 1A6: Use of our EVERBRIDGE system to warn residents of hazardous
weather or man‐made hazards
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Police
OBJECTIVE: 1B: Maintain Links to other sources of reliable information about infectious disease response,
including quarantine
Project Title/Action 1B1: Maintain Contracts with Bloomington Public Health for ongoing
services
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency BPH/Police/City Gov
Project Title/Action 1B2: Provide educational material along with the location of vaccination
clinics to employees and the public
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency EM/Police/BPH
Project Title/Action 1B3: Working with our diverse community through community outreach
groups on educational material regarding vaccinations and illnesses
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Update
Project Title/Action 1B4: Review and Update EBOLA Response Plan Protocols
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency All Depts./BPH
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
252
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions
Project Title/Action 2A1: Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard
mitigation actions
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire
Project Title/Action 2A2: Provide information to the public on the city website and through
public education opportunities
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EM/Police
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Promote partnerships between the state, counties, local jurisdictions, and partner agencies to
identify, prioritize, and implement mitigation actions
Project Title/Action 2B1: Participate as a member in local or regional hazard mitigation
planning group
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Police/Fire
Project Title/Action 2B2: Support or provide the public sector events, workshop, symposium,
and continued education opportunities
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire
OBJECTIVE: 2C: Work with Chamber of Commerce, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard
mitigation in local community
Project Title/Action 2C1: Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles
and practices
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire
Project Title/Action 2C2: Encourage businesses to develop and implement hazard mitigation
actions
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire
Project Title/Action 2C3: Ensure that Police and Fire have the latest edition of the Emergency
Response Guidebook
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Create a strategy to work with private industry and businesses to identify locations of
hazardous materials
Project Title/Action 4A1: Meet with Hazardous material producers to review state and federal
guidelines
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire/Bus
Project Title/Action 4A2: Receive updated emergency operations plans for private industry on
their protocols responding to Hazardous material incidents
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire/Bus
Project Title/Action 4A3: Receive updated locations of where Hazardous materials are stored
on site
Project Status Complete
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
253
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire/Bus
OBJECTIVE: 4B: Share SARA information with other city departments through ACTIVE 911 App
Project Title/Action 4B1: Have access through the Fire Department to other ACTIVE 911 User to
receive the SARA information overlay for other departments specifically
police
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Police/Fire
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Increase coordination with the State Duty Officer for Highway spills
Project Title/Action 5A1: Work with the Fire Department and Public Works on spill protocols
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire
Project Title/Action 5A2: Update information with State Duty Officer
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire
OBJECTIVE: 5B: Maintain and Update plan to contact Utility Companies
Project Title/Action 5B1: Provide contact information for City personnel to Utility Companies
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire
OBJECTIVE: 5C: Active Shooter situation. Coordination and Training with all local, county, and state agencies
Project Title/Action 5C1: Continue to develop “Play Book” for active shooter incidents
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire
Project Title/Action 5C2: Continue to train with Fire Department and other agencies in
response protocols and procedures
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire
Project Title/Action 5C3: Apply and receive grant funding to train on a more regional basis
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire
OBJECTIVE: 5D: CERT Training and Regional Asset sharing of resources
Project Title/Action 5D1: Continue to recruit and train CERT volunteers
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire
Project Title/Action 5D2: Work with local jurisdictions on exercises and events
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire
Project Title/Action 5D3: Apply and receive grant funding to offset the cost of the CERT
Program
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Work in Partnership with Community Development on education contractors and new
developers on Hazard Mitigation
Project Title/Action 6A1: Review and implement, if possible, changes in city ordinances
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
254
Project Title/Action 6A2: Conduct Study Sessions with City Council on new development
possibilities and include Hazard Mitigation/Disaster protocols
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Attorney/CD/City Counsel
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Training for Police, Fire, and Public Works personnel in response to hazards
Project Title/Action 7A1: Update training protocols and plans for all City departments on hazard
response including evacuation
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire/City
OBJECTIVE: 7B: Continue with Business CERT and TEEN CERT models in the community
Project Title/Action 7B1: Train more businesses in the CERT Model and solicit more volunteers
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire/CERT Admin/Businesses/ Park and Rec
Project Title/Action 7B2: Continue to train TEEN CERT volunteers in our community
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency EM/Police/Fire/CERT Admin/Businesses/ Park and Rec
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
255
3.3.37. CITY OF ROBBINSDALE
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
256
2024 Robbinsdale Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Retrofit/Upgrade/Repair water main from Minneapolis to Crystal
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Inspect main to ensure its durability City of
Crystal
$300,000 Short Complete
Objective 1B: Provide a Mobile Command Post for use during critical incidents.
1B1 Conduct meetings with Police and Fire personnel to determine
vehicle needs and capabilities
City of
Robbinsdale
$500 Short Ongoing Low 1
1B2 Purchase a multi‐use Command Post Vehicle for use by Police and
Fire units
City of
Robbinsdale
$400,000 Medium Ongoing Low 1
Objective 1C: Update EOC
1C1 Review current technology and make upgrades as necessary City of
Robbinsdale
$30,000 Short Ongoing 1 1
1C2 Provide ongoing training for EOC users City of
Robbinsdale
$20,000 Long Ongoing Low 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Put information on city website providing up‐to‐date disaster awareness information
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Create a page and/or links on the city website related to disaster
awareness and preparedness
City of
Robbinsdale
$5,000 Short In
Progess
Low 1
2A2 Assign personnel to periodically update the website to ensure
accurate and up‐to‐date information is available to citizens
City of
Robbinsdale
$5,000 Long Ongoing Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Reducing Phosphorus in Crystal Lake
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Ensure newly installed Flocculation Plant is fully operational and
reducing Phosphorus according to plan and maintain a safe level
City of
Robbinsdale
$5,000 Short Ongoing Low 1
3A2 Continue testing throughout year and tracking data City of
Robbinsdale
$10,000 Long Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
257
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Monitor Burlington Northern Railway Blue Line Construction Project
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Attend meetings and engage Engineers and Designers of new system
throughout the construction process
City of
Robbinsdale
$2,000 Short Cancelled Low 1
Objective 4B: Partner with Burlington Northern to understand what Hazmat controls and response would be needed once construction completed
4B1 With chemicals being transported through the city. Create an
“emergency action plan” with Burlington Northern using hazardous
material release scenario
City of
Robbinsdale
$25,000 Medium Cancelled Low 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses, Non‐
Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Maintaining City Staff/Elected Officials that are aware of Emergency Management plans and procedures
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Require that all applicable city personnel receive training in current
Emergency Management and FEMA practices
City of
Robbinsdale
$5,000 Short Ongoing Low 1
5A2 Ensure that Disaster Plans are maintained and applicable city
personnel are familiar with them
City of
Robbinsdale
$5,000 Short Ongoing Low 1
5A3 Provide information and instructions on how they can access or
enroll in classes toward state certification
City of
Robbinsdale
$500 Short Ongoing Low 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Maintain City Building Codes to ensure to most up‐to‐date and disaster resistant designs are used for future construction and renovations
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Require that applicable city engineers and inspectors receive
adequate training in current building designs and renovation
processes that provide enhanced disaster resistance
City of
Robbinsdale
$5,000 Short Ongoing Low 1
6A2 Assist Elected Officials/Department Heads in reviewing and
implementing building codes that promote enhanced safety and
integrity of structures
City of
Robbinsdale
$1,000 Short Ongoing Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Bury All Overhead Power lines
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
258
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work within the community and Xcel Energy to identify all power
lines which could be buried to reduce significant power failures
throughout the community.
City of
Robbinsdale
$3,000,000 Long Ongoing 3 1, 4, 5
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
8A1 The City of Robbinsdale is striving to connect with these communities
and ensure basic needs are met and find ways to thrive to include;
Embedded Social Workers, Joint Community Police and Partnership
Programs, and a Multicultural Advisory Committee.
City of
Robbinsdale
$75,000 /
year
Short Ongoing Low 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
9A1 Become a host city for MN GreenCorps interns to aid the city in
reducing environmental impacts in the community through
education, policy changes, and participating in Green Programs.
City of
Robbinsdale
Short Ongoing Low 1
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more resistant to
failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
10A1 Continue with installation of fiber optics throughout the city to
establish an updated technology and ensure redundancy.
City of
Robbinsdale
$5,000,000 Long Ongoing 2 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
259
Robbinsdale 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Retrofit/Upgrade/Repair water main from Minneapolis to Crystal
Project Title/Action 1A1: Inspect main to ensure its durability
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency City of Robbinsdale
OBJECTIVE: 1B: Provide a Mobile Command Post for use during critical incidents
Project Title/Action 1B1: Conduct meetings with Police and Fire personnel to determine vehicle
needs and capabilities
Project Status Project Ongoing
Project Title/Action 1B2: Purchase a multi‐use Command Post Vehicle for use by Police and Fire
units
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency City of Robbinsdale
OBJECTIVE: 1C: Update EOC
Project Title/Action 1C1: Review current technology and make upgrades as necessary
Project Status Anticipated completion date: March 2024
Project Title/Action 1C2: Provide ongoing training for EOC users
Project Status Project Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Robbinsdale
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Put information on city website providing up‐to‐date disaster awareness information
Project Title/Action 2A1: Create a page and/or links on the city website related to disaster
awareness and preparedness
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 2A2: Assign personnel to periodically update the website to ensure
accurate and up‐to‐date information is available to citizens
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City of Robbinsdale
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Reducing Phosphorus in Crystal Lake
Project Title/Action 3A1: Ensure newly installed Flocculation Plant is fully operational and
reducing Phosphorus according to plan and maintain a safe level
Project Status Project Ongoing
Project Title/Action 3A2: Continue testing throughout year and tracking data
Project Status Project Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Robbinsdale
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Monitor Burlington Northern Railway Blue Line Construction Project
Project Title/Action 4A1: Attend meetings and engage Engineers and Designers of new system
throughout the construction process
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency City of Robbinsdale
OBJECTIVE: 4B: Partner with Burlington Northern to understand what Hazmat controls and response would be
needed once construction completed
Project Title/Action 4B1: With chemicals being transported through the city. Create an
“emergency action plan” with Burlington Northern using hazardous
material release scenario
Project Status Canceled
Responsible Agency City of Robbinsdale
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
260
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Maintaining City Staff/Elected Officials that are aware of Emergency Management plans and
procedures
Project Title/Action 5A1: Require that all applicable city personnel receive training in current
Emergency Management and FEMA practices
Project Status Project Ongoing
Project Title/Action 5A2: Ensure that Disaster Plans are maintained, and applicable city
personnel are familiar with them
Project Status Project Ongoing
Project Title/Action 5A3: Provide information and instructions on how they can access or enroll
in classes toward state certification
Project Status Project Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Robbinsdale
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Maintain City Building Codes to ensure the most up‐to‐date and disaster resistant designs are
used for future construction and renovations
Project Title/Action 6A1: Require that applicable city engineers and inspectors receive
adequate training in current building designs and renovation processes that
provide enhanced disaster resistance
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 6A2: Assist Elected Officials/Department Heads in reviewing and
implementing building codes that promote enhanced safety and integrity
of structures
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City of Robbinsdale
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury All Overhead Power Lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work within the community and Xcel Energy to identify all power lines
which could be buried to reduce significant power failures throughout the
community
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency City of Robbinsdale
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
261
3.3.38. CITY OF ROCKFORD
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
262
2024 Rockford Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Enhance resident awareness.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Partner with local agencies to enhance resident
understanding of local hazards.
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing 1 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Assess flood related hazards within the community. Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing 2 1, 6
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Coordinate with water districts.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Coordinate with regional water districts to assess flood
vulnerability.
Emergency
Management
Personnel
Time
Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Ensure building code compliance and inspections are conducted on new construction projects.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
263
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Rockford 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
No Prior Projects.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
264
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
265
3.3.39. CITY OF ROGERS
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
266
2024 Rogers Mitigation Goals/Objectives/Actions/Status Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Storm Shelter
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Construct a shelter in a Senior Development
Area
EM/PW 75K 5 Cancelled Low 1, 5
1A2 Construct a shelter in the New South Community
Park
EM/PW 75K 5 On going Low 1, 5
1A3 Provide shelters for severe weather EM/Fire/Police
/PW
Staff Time 10 Ongoing Low 1, 5
1A4 Approve construction documents EM/PW 15K 1 Cancelled Low 1
1A5 Construct storm shelters in existing parks and
school field areas
EM/PW 400K 10 On Going Low 1, 5
Objective 1B: Water Fill Station in the SW Quadrant of our City (Non‐Hydrant area)
1B1 Fill station for fire apparatus EM/Fire/PW 100K 4 On going 1 1
1B2 Reduce travel time to fill fire apparatus in our
non‐hydrant areas
EM/Fire/PW Staff Time Continuously On Going 2 1
1B3 Purchase land EM/PW 15K 3 Cancelled Low 1
1B4 Engineering study for well site EM/PW 25K 1 Cancelled Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
267
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Become a Storm Ready Community EM 5K 2 On‐going Low 1
2A2 Provide flood insurance education to community
through various platforms
EM/Fire 1K Continuous On‐going Low 1, 5
2A3 Spread emergency management and
preparedness messages across all community
social media pages
EM/FIRE/PD/City 1K Continuous On‐going Low 1
2A4 Become Fire Wise community EM/Fire 1K 5 On‐going Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Identify historic and culturally impactful
properties and areas within the community.
EM/PW 5K 5 On‐Going Low 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Create a strategy to work with private industry and businesses to identify locations of hazardous materials
Action Description Agency Estimated Estimated Status Priority Funding
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
268
Responsible Cost Timeline Sources
4A1 Conduct annual fire inspections – Tier 2 Facilities Fire 15K Yearly On‐going 3 1
4A2 Conduct fire inspections and pre‐plans of
commercial and industrial occupancies at 1, 3,
and 5 year benchmarks
Fire 15K Yearly On‐going Low 1
4A3 Implement hazardous materials operational
permits
Fire 10K Yearly On‐going Low 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Bi‐Directional Amplifiers (BDA) Equipment
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Improve radio coverage in large buildings EM 100K 5 Cancelled Low 1
5A2 Improve radio coverage at the Rogers High
School for REP
EM 20K 2 Cancelled Low 1
5A3 Improve radio coverage in underground parking
ramps and tunnels between buildings
EM 60K 3 Cancelled Low 1
5A4 Meet with building owners on installing a BDA
system
EM/Fire/Police Staff Time Ongoing Cancelled Low 1
5A5 BDA Engineer EM 10K 1 Cancelled Low 1
5A6 Meet with Hennepin County Dispatch on existing EM/Fire/Police Staff Time Ongoing Cancelled Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
269
radio coverage
5A7 Improve radio coverage and reliability
throughout the community
EM/Fire/Police Varies Continuously On‐going Low 1
Objective 5B: Mass Emergency Notification System
5B1 Distribute emergency messages via telephone EM 9.5K 2 Cancelled Low 1
5B2 Deliver pre‐recorded messages from the
National Weather Service
EM 3.5K 2 Cancelled Low 1
5B3 Smart phone Code Red app EM $1/Year Ongoing Cancelled Low 1
5B4 Promote the use of NOAA Weather Radios EM Staff Time Ongoing Cancelled Low 1
5B5 Code Red Sales Engineer EM/Fire/PD/PW Staff Time 1 Cancelled Low 1
5B6 Source and implement a mass emergency
notification system through the Rogers
Community
EM/Fire/PD/PW 7K 1 On‐going Low 1
Objective 5C: Severe Weather Siren Maintenance and Installation
5C1 Install storm sirens to develop redundancy and
coverage throughout the remainder of the
community
EM 200K 10 On‐going Low 1
5C2 Update aging storm sirens to more modern
technology and siren style
EM 125K 5 On‐going Low 1
5C3 Strengthen current siren maintenance by bird
proofing poles and conducting annual
EM 75K Continuously On‐going Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
270
inspections and maintenance
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Ordinance development
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Work to develop shoreland ordinance CED Staff time 2 On‐going Low 1
6A2 Consider and evaluate flood management plan EM/CED/PW Staff time 2 On‐going Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Plan development
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Develop economic development plan EM/CED Staff Time 5 On‐going Low 1
7A2 Develop post disaster recovery plan EM/CED/PW Staff Time 5 On‐going Low 1
7A3 Develop CERT program EM/Fire 35K 10 On‐going Low 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
8A1 Develop emergency management cache EM Staff time Continuous On‐going Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
271
8A2 Develop sheltering plan and identify additional
sheltering locations
EM Staff time Continuous On‐going Low 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
9A1 Assess wildfire risk of park district land EM/Fire Staff time Continuous On‐going Low 1
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
10A1 Develop continuity of operation plan EM/City Staff Time 5 On‐going Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
272
Rogers 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Storm Shelter
Project Title/Action 1A1: Construct a shelter in a Senior Development Area
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency EM/PW
Project Title/Action 1A2: Construct a shelter in the New South Community Park
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM/PW
Project Title/Action 1A3: Provide shelters for severe weather
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM/Fire/Police/PW
Project Title/Action 1A4: Approve construction documents
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency EM/PW
Project Title/Action 1A5: Construct storm shelters in existing parks and school field areas
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM/PW
OBJECTIVE: 1B: Water Fill Station in the SW Quadrant of our City (Non‐Hydrant area)
Project Title/Action 1B1: Fill Station for fire apparatus
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM/Fire/PW
Project Title/Action 1B2: Reduce travel time to fill fire apparatus in our non‐hydrant areas
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM/Fire/PW
Project Title/Action 1B3: Purchase Land
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency EM/PW
Project Title/Action 1B4: Engineering Study for well site
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency EM/PW
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Bi‐Directional Amplifiers (BDA) Equipment
Project Title/Action 5A1: Improve radio coverage in large buildings
Project Status Cancelled
Summary of Project Large Buildings
Responsible Agency EM
Project Title/Action 5A2: Improve radio coverage at the Rogers High School for REP
Project Status Cancelled
Summary of Project HS radio coverage
Responsible Agency EM
Project Title/Action 5A3: Improve radio coverage in underground parking ramps and tunnels
between buildings
Project Status Cancelled
Summary of Project Parking and Tunnels
Responsible Agency EM
Project Title/Action 5A4: Meet with building owners on installing a BDA system
Project Status Cancelled
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
273
Summary of Project Building Owners
Responsible Agency EM/Fire/Police
Project Title/Action 5A5: BDA Engineer
Project Status Cancelled
Summary of Project Engineer study
Responsible Agency EM
Project Title/Action 5A6: Meet with Hennepin County Dispatch on existing radio coverage
Project Status Cancelled
Summary of Project Meet/Time with HCSO
Responsible Agency EM/Fire/Police
OBJECTIVE: 5B: Code Red Emergency Notification System
Project Title/Action 5B1: Distribute emergency messages via telephone
Project Status Cancelled
Summary of Project Alert Messages
Responsible Agency EM
Project Title/Action 5B2: Deliver Pre‐recorded messages from the National Weather Service
Project Status Cancelled
Summary of Project NWS Messages
Responsible Agency EM
Project Title/Action 5B3: Smart phone Code Red app
Project Status Cancelled
Summary of Project Code Red Application renewal
Responsible Agency EM
Project Title/Action 5B4: Promote the use of NOAA Weather Radios
Project Status Cancelled
Summary of Project NOAA radios
Responsible Agency EM
Project Title/Action 5B5: Code Red Sales Engineer
Project Status Cancelled
Summary of Project Sales Engineer
Responsible Agency EM/Fire/PD/PW
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
274
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
275
3.3.40. CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
276
2024 Saint Anthony Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Connect all city facilities to City Hall along with security system cameras and access key cards: develop the ability to provide a
secure environment both from an entry access and visual standpoint of all city facilities from a central location. Facilities include water
treatment plant, well houses, city hall, fire station, public works, park shelters/warming houses and storage garage.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Complete Fiber Optic Connections to all city facilities and
infrastructure
ENG/PW $150,000 Medium In
Progress
4 1
1A2 Expand card system able to be controlled through one
central secure location
ENG/PW $120,000 Long In
Progress
4 1
1A3 Expand camera system able to be controlled through one
central location
ENG/PW $180,000 Long In
Progress
4 1
Objective 1B: Provide traffic control upon signal failure: Obtain 50 temporary, portable stop signs
1B1 Place reflective roll‐up temporary stop signs with
portable sign bases at all intersections with traffic signals
as needed during a power outage
PW $12,000 Medium In
Progress
Low 1
1B2 Provide neighboring municipalities with temporary stop
signs by request during a power outage
PW Staff Time Medium In
Progress
Low 1
Objective 1C: Severe Weather/Tornado Occurrence: Develop safe policies, procedures, and facilities to reduce injuries and losses resulting
from severe weather
1C1 Annually review severe weather protocols and
procedures with students, faculty, and staff
EM/ISD 282 Staff Time
10 hours
Short In
Progress
Low 1
1C2 Publish and publicize procedures and plans for orderly
and safe shelter of the community as a distribution
center and resource
EM/ISD 282 Staff Time
4 Hours
Medium In
Progress
Low 1
1C3 Develop facilities to serve community for emergency
access for both summer and winter protection
EM/ISD 282 Staff Time
40 Hours
Long Delayed Low 1
Objective 1D: Dangerous Intruder Entry: Develop safe policies, procedures, and facilities to protect students, faculty, and staff in situations
with dangerous intruders that have entered the campus
1D1 Annually review emergency evacuation and protection
protocols with faculty, staff, and emergency responders
EM/ISD 282 Staff Time
10 Hours
Short In
Progress
Low 1
1D2 Identify safe gathering and retreat locations protected as
against intruders and unwanted campus entry
EM/ISD 282 Staff Time
10 Hours
Medium In
Progress
Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
277
1D3 Develop facilities to serve as retreat locations for safety
and security of students, faculty and staff.
EM/ISD 282 Staff Time
40 Hours
Long Delayed Low 1
Objective 1E: Destruction of primary emergency infrastructure and facilities: Develop contingency plans to ensure secure remote command
center for local emergency responders in case of destruction or incapacity of primary facilities or infrastructure
1E1 Annually review protocols and responsibility shifting if
critical infrastructure fails with local stakeholders at
school, city, county, state, and federal levels as necessary
EM/ISD 282 Staff Time
16 Hours
Short In
Progress
2 1
1E2 Identify and construct contingency facilities capable of
serving and supporting critical infrastructure upon failure
of primary facilities
EM/ISD 282 Staff Time Long Delayed 2 1
Objective 1F: Prevent inflow and infiltration into sanitary sewer, prevent sanitary sewer system backups
1F1 Replace sanitary sewer pipe, manholes, and service pipe.
This allows the city to provide sanitary sewer capability
and reduce the risk of sewer backups
ENG $185,000/
YR
4 Years In
Progress
Low 1, 4
Objective 1G: Provide safe intersections for motorists and pedestrians
1G1 Install battery backup systems at all signalized
intersections
ENG/PW $90,000 3 Years Delayed 3 1
Objective 1H: Increase fire flow capacity of water main, provide sufficient water to the public
1H1 Replacement of water main pipe, hydrants, and service
pipe
ENG $90,000 Annually Ongoing 5 1, 4
1H2 Complete utility interconnect at Roseville Water
Connection
ENG $125,000 Short Delayed 5 1, 4
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Protect the City’s municipal water supply from contamination
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Continue implementation of wellhead protection plan
document, public education, and outreach, and
implement projects identified in wellhead protection
plan
ENG/PW $25,000 4 years In
Progress
Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
278
3A1 Continue implementation of stormwater BMP’s to
protect watershed in the area.
PW Undeterm
ined
Short Ongoing Low 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: School Campus: Identify ongoing concerns and risks facing facilities and spaces and identify critical infrastructure
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Annually review procedures with interested persons
including police, fire, medical regarding enhanced risks
and concerns
ISD 282 Staff
hours:
10 hours
annually
4 Months Delayed Low 1
4A2 Promulgate plans and contingencies to protect and
support critical infrastructure and facilities
ISD 282 Staff
hours:
10 hours
annually
1 Month Delayed Low 1
4A3 Identify and develop backup and support facilities and
infrastructure in case of failure or emergency use
ISD 282 Staff
hours:
40 hours
annually
1 Month Delayed Low 1
Objective 4B: Community Parks: Identify risks and issues preserving safety and security to users in parks and associated facilities shared by
school district and city (LGUs)
4B1 Annually review emergency protocols with emergency
responders and critical school stakeholders.
ISD/EM/LE/
Fire
Staff
hours:
10 hours
annually
Annually Ongoing Low 1
4B2 Identify and develop safe gathering and retreat locations
protected as against hazards including natural disaster or
man‐made emergencies
ISD/EM/LE/
Fire
Staff
hours:
40 hours
annually
Annually Ongoing Low 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Coordinate resources in shared environments: Review and discuss coordination of responses in shared facilities and spaces
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
279
5A1 Determine line‐of‐command discussions and needs to
alert protocol
ISD 282 Staff
hours:
10 hours
annually
Annually,
short term
Delayed Low 1
5A2 Develop and enhance facilities to serve multiple
jurisdictional needs and uses
ISD 282 Staff
hours:
40 hours
annually
Annually,
short term
Delayed Low 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Identify disaster‐resistant components to new construction: In a fully developed community, determine design guidelines and
facility needs required for Inclusion in construction and remodeling of existing facilities
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Identify best practices and procedures with police, fire,
medical, and other interested parties for access, safety,
and protection
ISD 282 Staff
hours:
10 hours
annually
Annually,
short term
In
Progress
Low 1
6A2 Determine novel multi‐use facilities capable to serve
multiple jurisdictional needs and priorities
ISD 282 Staff
hours:
10 hours
annually
Medium Delayed Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Increase the amounts of storm water removed from surface grade during rain events
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Replacement of undersized storm sewer piping; this
action allows the city to increase the amount of
rainwater removed that may cause flooding and aids in
prevention of structural damage
ENG/PW $200,000 Ongoing In
Progress
1 1, 4, 5
Objective 7B: Provide for emergency functions at City Hall and neighboring municipalities
7B1 Purchase a portable trailer mounted 300k Generator PW $150,000 Long Complete Low 1, 5
7B2 Configure separate circuit(s) for emergency functions PW $35,000 Long Complete Low 1, 4, 5
7B3 Provide neighboring municipalities the ability to use the
portable trailer mounted generator during power outage
PW Staff Time Long Complete Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
280
Objective 7C: Locate and create facilities capable of providing protection against likely hazards: Identify and construct optimal safe structures
to protect against probable hazards
7C1 Identify and prioritize hazards likely to occur with police,
fire, medical, and other interested parties for access,
safety, and protection
ISD 282 Staff
hours:
10 hours
annually
Short In
Progress
Low 1
7C2 Construct a shared, multi‐season, multiple‐use shelter to
maximize safety from and resulting after severe weather,
unwanted intruders, or other emergency situations
affecting the community and school facilities, that will
serve multiple‐jurisdictional needs and be available and
accessible for use by local cities and the general public
community in case of emergency situations occurring
either inside or outside Central Park including as a
remote operations center for emergency services in case
of failure of primary critical infrastructure.
ISD 282 $1 million 1 Year Delayed Low 1, 5
Objective 7D: Prevent failure of control systems for water treatment facilities and municipal wells 3,4, & 5
7D1 Upgrade SCADA System ENG/PW $100,000 2 years Complete Low 1
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
8A1 Expand city communications capabilities to include
multiple languages
EM/Commu
nications
Nominal;
use of
existing
capabilitie
s
Staff
hours: 10
hours
annually
Short Delayed Low 1
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
281
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
9A1 Enhance Groundwater and well monitoring capabilities to
ensure safe and adequate drinking water Levels
PW/ENG $50,000 Short In
Progress
Low 1
9A2 Work with Hennepin County EM to expand MESONET to a
monitoring site located in the city of St Anthony
EM Staff Time Short/Me
dium
In
Progress
Low 1
9A3 Begin Climate Action Study and potential subsequent
Climate Action Plan
Admin Staff Time Short In
Progress
Low 1
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
10A1 Expand 800 mhz Communication Capabilities of PW and
Admin to ensure lines of communications in an
emergency
EM/PW $250,000 Short Delayed 2 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
282
Saint Anthony 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Connect all city facilities to City Hall along with security system cameras and access key cards:
develop the ability to provide a secure environment both from an entry access and visual standpoint of all city
facilities from a central location. Facilities include water treatment plant, well houses, city hall, fire station,
public works, park shelters/warming houses and storage garage.
Project Title/Action 1A1: Complete Fiber Optic Connections to all city facilities
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2026
Project Title/Action 1A2: Expand card system able to be controlled through one central secure
location
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2026
Project Title/Action 1A3: Expand camera system able to be controlled through one central
location
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2026
Responsible Agency Eng./PW
OBJECTIVE: 1B: Provide traffic control upon signal failure: Obtain 50 temporary, portable stop signs
Project Title/Action 1B1: Place reflective roll‐up temporary stop signs with portable sign bases
at all intersections with traffic signals as needed during a power outage
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2025
Project Title/Action 1C2: Provide neighboring municipalities with temporary stop signs by
request during a power outage
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2025
Responsible Agency PW
OBJECTIVE: 1C: Severe Weather/Tornado Occurrence: Develop safe policies, procedures, and facilities to
reduce injuries and losses resulting from severe weather
Project Title/Action 1C1: Annually review severe weather protocols and procedures with
students, faculty, and staff
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 1C2: Publish and publicize procedures and plans for orderly and safe
shelter of the community as a distribution center and resource
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 1C3: Develop facilities to serve community for emergency access for both
summer and winter protection
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency ISD
OBJECTIVE: 1D: Dangerous Intruder Entry: Develop safe policies, procedures, and facilities to protect students,
faculty, and staff in situations with dangerous intruders that have entered the campus
Project Title/Action 1D1: Annually review emergency evacuation and protection protocols with
faculty, staff, and emergency responders
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2025
Project Title/Action 1D2: Identify safe gathering and retreat locations protected as against
intruders and unwanted campus entry
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 1D3: Develop facilities to serve as retreat locations for safety and security
of students, faculty, and staff
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency EM/ISD 282
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
283
OBJECTIVE: 1E: Destruction of primary emergency infrastructure and facilities: Develop contingency plans to
ensure secure remote command center for local emergency responders in case of destruction or incapacity of
primary facilities or infrastructure
Project Title/Action 1E1: Annually review protocols and responsibility shifting if critical
infrastructure fails with local stakeholders at school, city, county, state, and
federal levels as necessary
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 1E2: Identify and construct contingency facilities capable of serving and
supporting critical infrastructure upon failure of primary facilities
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency EM/ISD 282
OBJECTIVE: 1G: Prevent inflow and infiltration into sanitary sewer, prevent sanitary sewer system backups
Project Title/Action 1F1: Replace sanitary sewer pipe, manholes, and service pipe. This allows
the city to provide sanitary sewer capability and reduce the risk of sewer
backups
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2037
Responsible Agency Engineering
OBJECTIVE: 1H: Provide safe intersections for motorists and pedestrians
Project Title/Action 1G1: Install battery backup systems at all signalized intersections
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency Eng./PW
OBJECTIVE: 1I: Increase fire flow capacity of water main, provide sufficient water to the public
Project Title/Action 1H1: Replacement of water main pipe, hydrants, and service pipe
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2037
Project Title/Action 1H2: Complete utility interconnect at Roseville Water Connection
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency Engineering
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Protect the City’s municipal water supply from contamination
Project Title/Action 2A1: Continue implementation of wellhead protection plan document,
public education, and outreach, and implement projects identified in
wellhead protection plan
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency Eng./PW
OBJECTIVE: 4A: School Campus: Identify ongoing concerns and risks facing facilities and spaces and identify
critical infrastructure
Project Title/Action 4A1: Annually review procedures with interested persons including police,
fire, medical regarding enhanced risks and concerns
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 4A2: Promulgate plans and contingencies to protect and support critical
infrastructure and facilities
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 4A3: Identify and develop backup and support facilities and infrastructure
in case of failure or emergency use
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency EM/ISD 282
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
284
OBJECTIVE: 4B: Community Parks: Identify risks and issues preserving safety and security to users in parks and
associated facilities shared by school district and city (LGUs)
Project Title/Action 4B1: Annually review emergency protocols with emergency responders and
critical school stakeholders.
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2026
Project Title/Action 4B2: identify and develop safe gathering and retreat locations protected as
against hazards including natural disaster or man‐made emergencies.
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency ISD/EM/LE/Fire
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Coordinate resources in shared environments: Review and discuss coordination of responses in
shared facilities and spaces
Project Title/Action 5A1: Determine line‐of‐command discussions and needs to alert protocol
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 5A2: Develop and enhance facilities to serve multiple jurisdictional needs
and uses
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency EM/ISD 282
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Identify disaster‐resistant components to new construction: In a fully developed community,
determine design guidelines and facility needs required for Inclusion in construction and remodeling of existing
facilities
Project Title/Action 6A1: Identify best practices and procedures with police, fire, medical, and
other interested parties for access, safety, and protection
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 6A2: Determine novel multi‐use facilities capable to serve multiple
jurisdictional needs and priorities
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency EM/ISD 282
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Increase the amounts of storm water removed from surface grade during rain events
Project Title/Action 7A1: Replacement of undersized storm sewer piping; this action allows the
city to increase the amount of rainwater removed that may cause flooding
and aids in prevention of structural damage
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency Eng./PW
OBJECTIVE: 7B: Provide for emergency functions at City Hall and neighboring municipalities
Project Title/Action 7B1: Purchase a portable trailer mounted 300k Generator
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 7B2: Configure separate circuit(s) for emergency functions
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 7B3: Provide neighboring municipalities the ability to use the portable
trailer mounted generator during power outage
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency PW
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
285
OBJECTIVE: 7C: Locate and create facilities capable of providing protection against likely hazards: Identify and
construct optimal safe structures to protect against probable hazards
Project Title/Action 7C1: Identify and prioritize hazards likely to occur with police, fire, medical,
and other interested parties for access, safety, and protection
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2026
Project Title/Action 7C2: Construct a shared, multi‐season, multiple‐use shelter to maximize
safety from and resulting after severe weather, unwanted intruders, or
other emergency situations affecting the community and school facilities,
that will serve multiple‐jurisdictional needs and be available and accessible
for use by local cities and the general public community in case of
emergency situations occurring either inside or outside Central Park
including as a remote operations center for emergency services in case of
failure of primary critical infrastructure.
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency ISD
OBJECTIVE: 7D: Prevent failure of control systems for water treatment facilities and municipal wells 3,4, & 5
Project Title/Action 7D1: Upgrade SCADA System
Project Status Complete
Summary of Project Update; Redundant server is online, beginning in December 2023
Responsible Agency Eng./PW
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
286
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
287
3.3.41. CITY OF SAINT BONIFACIUS
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
288
2024 Saint Bonifacius Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Flooding: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to flooding
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Review and update policies that discourage growth in
flood‐prone areas
City of St.
Bonifacius
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1A2 Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance
Program
City of St.
Bonifacius
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Work with local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in local community
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation
principles and practices
City of St.
Bonifacius
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 2 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Establish Multi‐Jurisdictional partnership to reduce runoff
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Work with the local watersheds to continue to protect
our lakes and streams for future water quality
City of St.
Bonifacius
Cost for
construction
of holding
ponds
Design
Construction
Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A
Action Action Action Action Action Action Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
289
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Continue to meet the State and Federal regulations with
the protection plan
City of St.
Bonifacius
Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A
Action Action Action Action Action Action Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Bury Power Lines
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work with the community to identify power lines that
could be buried to reduce power failures in heavily
populated areas
City of St.
Bonifacius
Plans
Construction
Ongoing Too Cost
Prohibitive
1 1, 4, 5
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
290
Saint Bonifacius 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Flooding: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses
due to flooding
Project Title/Action 1A1: Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐prone
areas
Project Status In‐Progress
Responsible Agency City of St. Bonifacius
Project Title/Action 1A2: Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of St. Bonifacius
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Work with local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in local community
Project Title/Action 2A1: Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles
and practices
Project Status Ongoing
Summary of Project Administration, Police Department
Responsible Agency City of St. Bonifacius
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Establish Multi‐Jurisdictional partnership to reduce runoff
Project Title/Action 3A1: Work with the local watersheds to continue to protect our lakes and
streams for future water quality
Project Status Ongoing
Summary of Project Public Works Department, Watershed Districts
Responsible Agency City of St. Bonifacius
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Project Title/Action 5A1: Continue to meet the State and Federal regulations with the
protection plan
Project Status Ongoing
Summary of Project Public Works, Planning Department
Responsible Agency City of St. Bonifacius
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury Power Lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work with the community to identify power lines that could be buried
to reduce power failures in heavily populated areas
Project Status In‐Progress
Responsible Agency City of St. Bonifacius
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
291
3.3.42. CITY OF SAINT LOUIS PARK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
292
2024 Saint Louis Park Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Spring thaw and water bodies rising
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Improve storm water management
planning
Emergency Management Personnel Time Complete Complete 1 1
1A2 Adopt policies to reduce storm water
runoff
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled 2 1
1A3 Coordinate with Minnehaha Watershed Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
Objective 1B: Short term flooding from torrential rain
1B1 Improve storm water management
planning
Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1B2 Adopt policies to reduce storm water
runoff
Emergency Management Personnel Time 1 Year Delayed Low 1
1B3 Coordinate with Minnehaha Watershed Emergency Management Personnel Time Complete Complete Low 1
Objective 1C: Unusual snow event
1C1 Adopt and enforce building codes Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
1C2 Protect buildings and infrastructure Emergency Management Personnel Time Complete Complete Low 1
1C3 Protect power lines Emergency Management Personnel Time Complete Complete Low 1
1C4 Reduce impact to roadways Emergency Management Personnel Time Complete Complete Low 1
Objective 1D: Wind/Tornados
1D1 Encourage safe rooms Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
1D2 Require wind resistant building
techniques
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
1D3 Protect power lines Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 1E: Evacuation routes rail or hazardous materials
1E1 Assess community risk Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
Objective 1F: Vulnerable populations
1F1 Improve household disaster
preparedness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1F2 Increase hazard education and risk
awareness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
293
1F3 Assist vulnerable populations Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 1G: Severe cold, closed schools, impact on infrastructure
1G1 Reduce the effects of the urban heat
island effect
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
1G2 Increase awareness of extreme
temperature risk and safety
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
1G3 Educate property owners on cold
weather preparations
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
Objective 1H: Severe hot weather
1H1 Reduce urban heat island effect Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
1H2 Increase awareness of extreme
temperature risk and safety
Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1H3 Manage cooling centers Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
Objective 1I: Lightning strikes
1I1 Protect critical infrastructure Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
Objective 1J: Wild land urban interface
1J1 Educate on the importance of
maintaining debris and fuel loads close
to structures
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
Objective 1K: Train derailment/crude oil, ethanol, or other hazardous materials
1K1 Improve communications between rail
companies and responders
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
1K2 Train for response and evacuation Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
1K3 Educate stakeholders in high‐risk areas Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Public outreach – rail corridor
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Improve household disaster
preparedness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2A2 Increase hazard education and risk
awareness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2A3 Assist vulnerable populations Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
294
2A4 Integrate mitigation into local planning Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2B: Evacuation routes rail and hazardous materials
2B1 Protect infrastructure and critical
facilities
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2B2 Increase hazard education and risk
awareness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2B3 Improve household disaster
preparedness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
Objective 2C: Wind/Tornados
2C1 Conduct tornado awareness activities Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2C2 Increase hazard education and risk
awareness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2C3 Improve household disaster
preparedness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2D: Power grid down interruption: address heat and cold conditions
2D1 Protect infrastructure and critical
facilities
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2D2 Reduce urban heat island effect Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2D3 Increase awareness of extreme
temperature risk and safety
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2D4 Protect power lines Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2D5 Assess back‐up generator capacity Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2D6 Improve household disaster
preparedness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2E: Vulnerable populations, lack of resiliency
2E1 Improve household disaster
preparedness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2E2 Increase hazard education and
awareness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2E3 Assist vulnerable populations Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2E4 Assess vulnerable populations Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2F: Warning notifications
2F1 Assess community risk Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
295
2F2 Assist vulnerable populations Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2F3 Increase education and risk awareness Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 2G: Severe cold, close school, impact on infrastructure
2G1 Increase awareness of extreme
temperature risk and safety
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2G2 Increase hazard education Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
Objective 2H: Severe hot weather
2H1 Increase awareness of extreme
temperature risk and safety
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2H2 Increase hazard education and risk
awareness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2H3 Improve household disaster
preparedness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2H4 Assess cooling centers Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
Objective 2I: Lightning strikes
2I1 Conduct lightning awareness programs Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2I2 Increase hazard education and risk
awareness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2I3 Improve household disaster
preparedness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
Objective 2J: Unusual snow event
2J1 Conduct winter weather risk awareness
activities
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2J2 Increase awareness of extreme
temperature risk and safety
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2J3 Increase hazard education and risk
awareness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
2J4 Improve household disaster
preparedness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Cancelled Cancelled Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A:
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
296
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Security of water supply
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Protect infrastructure and critical
facilities
Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 4B: Power grid down/interruption; address heat and cold issues
4B1 ‐ Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Evacuation routes rail‐hazardous materials
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Assess community risk Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
5A2 Map community risk Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
5A3 Adopt development regulations in
hazard areas
Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
5A4 Limit density in hazard areas Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
5A5 Protect structures Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
5A6 Protect infrastructure and critical
facilities
Emergency Management Personnel Time Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 5B: Major city events and their impact on planning
5B1 Assess community risk Emergency Management Personnel Time Complete Complete Low 1
5B2 Map community risk Emergency Management Personnel Time Complete Complete Low 1
5B3 Protect infrastructure and critical
facilities
Emergency Management Personnel Time Complete Complete Low 1
Objective 5C: Civil disturbance
5C1 Assess community risk Emergency Management Personnel Time Complete Complete Low 1
5C2 Map community risk Emergency Management Personnel Time Complete Complete Low 1
5C3 Protect critical infrastructure and critical
facilities
Emergency Management Personnel Time Complete Complete Low 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
297
Objective 6A: Require fire sprinklers in all new construction
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Increase education and risk awareness Emergency Management Personnel Time Complete Complete Low 1
6A2 Improve household disaster
preparedness
Emergency Management Personnel Time Complete Complete Low 1
6A3 Assess community risk Emergency Management Personnel Time Complete Complete Low 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A:
Action Description Agency Responsible Estimated Cost Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
298
Saint Louis Park 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Spring thaw and water bodies rising
Project Title/Action 1A1: Improve storm water management planning
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1A2: Adopt policies to reduce storm water runoff
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 1A3: Coordinate with Minnehaha Watershed
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1B: Short term flooding from torrential rains
Project Title/Action 1B1: Improve storm water management planning
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 1B2: Adopt policies to reduce storm water runoff
Project Status Delayed
Project Title/Action 1B3: Coordinate with Minnehaha Watershed
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1C: Unusual snow event
Project Title/Action 1C1: Adopt and enforce building codes
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 1C2: Protect buildings and infrastructure
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1C3: Protect power lines
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1C4: Reduce impacts to roadways
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1D: Wind/Tornados
Project Title/Action 1D1: Encourage safe rooms
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 1D2: Require wind resistant building techniques
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 1D3: Protect power lines
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1E: Evacuation routes rail or hazardous materials
Project Title/Action 1E1: Assess community risk
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1F: Vulnerable Populations
Project Title/Action 1F1: Improve household disaster preparedness
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 1F2: Increase hazard education and risk awareness
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 1F3: Assist vulnerable populations
Project Status Ongoing
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
299
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1G: Severe cold, close schools, impact on infrastructure
Project Title/Action 1G1: Reduce the effects of the urban heat island effect
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 1G2: Increase awareness of extreme temperature risk and safety
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 1G3: Educate property owners on cold weather preparations
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1H: Severe hot weather
Project Title/Action 1H1: Reduce urban heat island effect
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 1H2: Increase awareness of extreme temperature risk and safety
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 1H3: Manage cooling centers
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1I: Lightning Strikes
Project Title/Action 1I1: Protect critical infrastructure
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1J: Wild land urban interface
Project Title/Action 1J1: Educate on the importance of maintaining debris and fuel loads close
to structures
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 1K: Train derailment/crude oil, ethanol, or other hazardous materials
Project Title/Action 1K1: Improve communications between rail companies and responders
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 1K2: Train for response and evacuation
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 1K3: Educate stakeholders in high‐risk areas
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Public outreach ‐rail corridor
Project Title/Action 2A1: Improve household disaster preparedness
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 2A2: Increase hazard education and risk awareness
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 2A3: Assist vulnerable populations
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 2A4: Integrate mitigation into local planning
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Evacuation routes rail and Hazardous materials
Project Title/Action 2B1: Protect infrastructure and critical facilities
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
300
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2B2: Increase hazard education and risk awareness
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2B3: Improve household disaster preparedness
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2C: Wind/Tornado
Project Title/Action 2C1: Conduct tornado awareness activities
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2C2: Increase hazard education and risk awareness
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 2C3: Improve household disaster preparedness
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2D: Power grid down interruption: address heat and cold conditions
Project Title/Action 2D1: Protect infrastructure and critical facilities
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2D2: Reduce urban heat island effect
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2D3: Increase awareness of extreme temperature risk and safety
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2D4: Protect power lines
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2D5: Assess back‐up generator capacity
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 2D6: Improve household disaster preparedness
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2E: Vulnerable populations, lack of resiliency
Project Title/Action 2E1: Improve household disaster preparedness
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 2E2: Increase hazard education and awareness
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 2E3: Assist vulnerable populations
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 2E4: Assess vulnerable populations
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2F: Warning notifications
Project Title/Action 2F1: Assess community risk
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 2F2: Assist vulnerable populations
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 2F3: Increase education and risk awareness
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
301
OBJECTIVE: 2G: Severe cold; close schools, impact on infrastructure
Project Title/Action 2G1: Increase awareness of extreme Temperature risk and safety
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2G2: Increase hazard education
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2H: Severe hot weather
Project Title/Action 2H1: Increase awareness of extreme temperature risk and safety
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2H2: Increase hazard education and risk awareness
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2H3: Improve household disaster preparedness
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2H4: Assess cooling centers
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2I: Lightning strikes
Project Title/Action 2I1: Conduct lighting awareness programs
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2I2: Increase hazard education and risk awareness
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2I3: Improve household disaster preparedness
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 2J: Unusual snow event
Project Title/Action 2J1: Conduct winter weather risk awareness activities
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2J2: Increase awareness of extreme temperature risk and safety
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2J3: Increase hazard education and risk awareness
Project Status Cancelled
Project Title/Action 2J4: Improve household disaster preparedness
Project Status Cancelled
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Security of water supply
Project Title/Action 4A1: Protect infrastructure and critical facilities
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 4B: Power grid down/interruption; address heat and cold issues
Project Title/Action 4B1:
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Evacuation routes rail‐hazardous materials
Project Title/Action 5A1: Assess community risk
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 5A2: Map community risk
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
302
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 5A3: Adopt development regulations in hazard areas
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 5A4: Limit density in hazard areas
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 5A5: Protect structures
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 5A6: Protect infrastructure and critical facilities
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 5B: Major city events and their impact on planning
Project Title/Action 5B1: Assess community risk
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 5B2: Map community risk
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 5B3: Protect infrastructure and critical facilities
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 5C: Civil disturbance
Project Title/Action 5C1: Assess community risk
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 5C2: Map community risk
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 5C3: Protect critical infrastructure and critical facilities
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Require fire sprinklers in all new construction
Project Title/Action 6A1: Increase education and risk awareness
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 6A2: Improve household disaster preparedness
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 6A3: Assess community risk
Project Status Complete
Responsible Agency Emergency Management
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
303
3.3.43. CITY OF SHOREWOOD
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
304
2024 Shorewood Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Achieve certification in the National Weather Service Storm Ready Program
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Achieve certification in the National Weather Service Storm
Ready Program
SLMPD Staff
Time
3 Years Ongoing 2 1
Objective 2B: Improve citizens understanding of available communications for notification of severe weather warnings.
2B1 Host annual severe weather awareness courses SLMPD Staff
Time
Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
2B2 Host annual Skywarn course for local citizens and first
responders
SLMPD Staff
Time
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Monitor Burlington Northern Railway Blue Line Construction Project
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
305
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A: Ensure building code compliance and inspections are conducted on new construction projects
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
6A1 Design and implement checklists with timelines for all new
projects
Inspections Staff
Time
Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Objective 6B: Encourage new or existing power lines to be buried for the reduction of future power outages
6B1 Include language in building code recommending buried power
lines
Planning Staff
Time
Ongoing Ongoing 1 1
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
306
Shorewood 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Achieve certification in the National Weather Service Storm Ready Program
Project Title/Action 2A1: Achieve certification in the National Weather Service Storm Ready Program
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency SLMPD
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Improve citizens understanding of available communications for notification of severe weather warnings
Project Title/Action 2B1: Host annual severe weather awareness courses
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 2B2: Host annual Skywarn course for local citizens and first responders
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency SLMPD
OBJECTIVE: 6A: Ensure building code compliance and inspections are conducted on new construction projects
Project Title/Action 6A1: Design and implement checklists with timelines for all new projects
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Inspections
OBJECTIVE: 6B: Encourage new or existing power lines to be buried for the reduction of future power outages
Project Title/Action 6B1: Include language in building code recommending buried power lines
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency Planning
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
307
3.3.44. CITY OF SPRING PARK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
308
2024 Spring Park Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Flooding: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to flooding
Action
Item
Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐
prone areas
City of
Orono
Staff Time 2024‐2028 Ongoing 5 1
1A2 Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance
Program
City of
Orono
Staff Time 2024‐2028 Ongoing 4 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Work with Chamber of Commerce, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in local community
Action
Item
Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation
principles and practices
City of
Orono
Staff Time 2024‐2028 Ongoing 6 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A: Establish Multi‐jurisdictional partnership to reduce runoff
Action
Item
Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
3A1 Work with the local watersheds to continue to protect our
lakes and streams for future water quality
City of
Orono
20K 2024‐2028 Ongoing 2 1
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A:
Action
Item
Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Action
Item
Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Continue to meet the State and Federal regulations with the
protection plan
City of
Orono
Staff Time 2024‐2028 Ongoing 3 1
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
309
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A:
Action
Item
Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Bury Power Lines
Action
Item
Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work with the community to identify power lines that could
be buried to reduce power failures in heavily populated areas
City of
Orono
100K 2024‐2028 Ongoing 1 1, 4, 5
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action
Item
Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action
Item
Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action
Item
Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
310
Spring Park 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Flooding: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses
due to flooding
Project Title/Action 1A1: Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood‐prone
areas
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 1A2: Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Orono
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Work with Chamber of Commerce, businesses, and other local agencies to promote hazard
mitigation in local community
Project Title/Action 2A1: Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles and
practices
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Orono
OBJECTIVE: 3A: Establish Multi‐Jurisdictional partnership to reduce runoff
Project Title/Action 3A1: Work with the local watersheds to continue to protect our lakes and
streams for future water quality
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Spring Park
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Wellhead Protection Plan
Project Title/Action 5A1: Continue to meet the State and Federal regulations with the protection
plan
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Spring Park
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury Power Lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work with the community to identify power lines that could be buried
to reduce power failures in heavily populated areas
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency City of Spring Park
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
311
3.3.45. CITY OF TONKA BAY
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
312
2024 Tonka Bay Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Reduce future losses to power lines due to severe storms
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Encourage new or existing power lines to be buried for the
reduction of future power outages
PW Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 2 1
Objective 1B: Reduce future losses to Lift Stations during storms
1B1 Repair /reline all of Lift Station #7’s lines PW 15,000 2‐5 yrs. Ongoing Low 1, 4, 5
1B2 Reduce future flooding around Lift Station #9 by elevating the
grade
PW 5,000 2‐5 yrs. Ongoing Low 1, 4, 5
1B3 Elevate land around Lift Station #1 & #2 above last known flood
level near Woodpecker Ridge Road.
PW 9,000 2‐5 yrs. Ongoing Low 1, 4, 5
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Achieve certification in the National Weather Service Storm Ready Program
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Achieve certification in the National Weather Service Storm
Ready Program
SLMPD Staff Time 3 Years Delayed 2 1
Objective 2B: Improve citizens understanding of available communications for notification of severe weather warnings
2B1 Host annual severe weather awareness courses. SLMPD Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 3 1
2B2 Host annual Skywarn course for local citizens and first
responders
SLMPD Staff Time Ongoing Ongoing 4 1
Objective 2C: Reduce the impact of flooding on private and public structures
2C1 Encourage participation in the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP)
PW NA Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Reduce future losses due to flooding
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
313
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Extend Woodpecker Ridge Road on the south end to prevent
flood water from getting into sewer manhole
PW 25,000 2‐5 yrs. Ongoing Low 1, 4, 5
4A2 Elevate West Point Road & west Point Drive above last known
flood level.
PW 55,000 2‐5 yrs. Ongoing Low 1, 4, 5
4A3 Elevate crabapple Lane to the last known flood level PW 15,000 2‐5 yrs. Ongoing Low 1, 4, 5
4A4 Build a berm along Woodpecker Ridge Road due to continual
flooding
PW 8,000 2‐5 yrs. Ongoing Low 1, 4, 5
4A5 Elevate Sunrise Avenue due to continual flooding PW 20,000 2‐5 yrs. Ongoing 1 1, 4, 5
4A6 Elevate power supply/transformer above last known flood level
along Woodpecker Ridge Road
PW 5,000 2‐5 yrs. Ongoing 3 1, 4, 5
4A7 Identify and mitigate future sinkholes along Pleasant Park Road PW 9,000 2‐5 yrs. Ongoing Low 1
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses,
Non‐Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
314
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more
resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
315
Tonka Bay 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Reduce future losses to power lines due to severe storms
Project Title/Action 1A1: Encourage new or existing power lines to be buried for the reduction
of future power outages
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency PW
OBJECTIVE: 1B: Reduce future losses to Lift Station during storms
Project Title/Action 1B1: Repair/reline all of Lift Station #7’s lines
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 1B2: Reduce future flooding around Lift Station #9 by elevating the grade
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 1B3: Elevate land around Lift Station #1 & #2 above last known flood level
near Woodpecker Ridge Road
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency PW
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Achieve certification in the National Weather Service Storm Ready Program
Project Title/Action 2A1: Achieve certification in the National Weather Service Storm Ready
Program
Project Status Delayed
Responsible Agency SLMPD
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Improve citizens understanding of available communications for notification of severe weather
warnings
Project Title/Action 2B1: Host annual severe weather awareness courses
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 2B2: Host annual Skywarn course for local citizens and first responders
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency SLMPD
OBJECTIVE: 2C: Reduce the impact of flooding on private and public structures
Project Title/Action 2C1: Encourage participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP)
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency PW
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Reduce future losses due to flooding
Project Title/Action 4A1: Extend Woodpecker Ridge Road on the south end to prevent flood
water from getting into sewer manhole
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 4A2: Elevate West Point Road & West Point Drive above last known flood
level
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 4A3: elevate Crabapple Lane to the last known flood level
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 4A4: Build a berm along Woodpecker Ridge Road due to continual flooding
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 4A5: Elevate Sunrise Avenue due to continual flooding
Project Status Ongoing
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
316
Project Title/Action 4A6: Elevate power supply/transformer above last known flood level along
Woodpecker Ridge Road
Project Status Ongoing
Project Title/Action 4A7: Identify and mitigate future sinkholes along Pleasant Park Road
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency PW
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
317
3.3.46. CITY OF WAYZATA
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
318
2024 Wayzata Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A: Improve Community Notification Capabilities
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
1A1 Review available products and vendors offering notification systems EM Director Staff Time 2 years On
Schedule
Low 1
1A2 Implement “Next Door” program for neighborhood specific
notifications.
EM Director Staff Time 2 years Cancelled Low 1
1A3 Prepare Community Presentation on emergency
response/notification
EM Director Staff Time 2 years Ongoing 2 1
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Achieve certification in National Weather Service StormReady program
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Meet requirements of the program EM Director Training
time
2 years Delayed 1 1
2A2 Prepare Community Presentation on severe weather awareness EM Director 1K 2 years Delayed 3 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A: Ensure water runoff choke points have adequate infrastructure to withstand flood
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
4A1 Inventory critical choke points and inspect and/or improve
infrastructure
EM Director
EM Coord
Unknown 2 years On
Schedule
4 1, 4, 6
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses, Non‐
Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
Objective 5A:
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
319
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Bury power lines
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work with the community to identify power lines that could be
buried to reduce power failures in heavily populated areas
EM Director
EM Coord
Staff Time Ongoing On
Schedule
5 1, 4, 5
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment.
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more resistant to
failure and resilient to natural hazards.
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
320
Wayzata 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 1A: Improve Community Notification Capabilities
Project Title/Action 1A1: Review available products and vendors offering notification systems
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2026
Project Title/Action 1A2: Implement “Next Door” program for neighborhood specific
notifications
Project Status Complete
Project Title/Action 1A3: Prepare Community Presentation on emergency response/notification
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2025
Responsible Agency Wayzata Police Department
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Achieve certification in National Weather Service StormReady program
Project Title/Action 2A1: Meet requirements of the program
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2025
Project Title/Action 2A2: Prepare Community Presentation on severe weather awareness
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2025
Responsible Agency EM Director
OBJECTIVE: 4A: Ensure water runoff choke points have adequate infrastructure to withstand flood
Project Title/Action 4A1: Inventory critical choke points and inspect and/or improve
infrastructure
Project Status Anticipated completion date: 2026
Responsible Agency EM Director EM Coord
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury Power Lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work with the community to identify power lines that could be
buried to reduce power failures in heavily populated areas
Project Status Ongoing
Responsible Agency EM Director EM Coord
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
321
3.3.47. CITY OF WOODLAND
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
322
2024 Woodland Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Update
Goal 1: Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment from natural hazards
Objective 1A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 2: Increase education opportunities and outreach, and improve resident awareness of natural hazards and hazard mitigation
Objective 2A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
2A1 Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard
mitigation actions
LE, City
Staff
5K Medium In
Progress
4 1
2A2 Provide information to the public on the city website and through
public education opportunities
LE, City
Staff
5K Medium In
Progress
2 1
Objective 2B: Promote partnerships between the state, counties, local jurisdictions, and partner agencies to identify, prioritize, and implement
mitigation actions
2B1 Participate as a member in local or regional hazard mitigation
planning group
EM Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
2B2 Support or provide the public sector events, workshop, symposium,
and continued education opportunities
EM Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 3: Protect Natural, Cultural, and Historic resources from future losses due to natural disasters
Objective 3A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 4: Identify areas with greatest impact, vulnerability, and risk from natural hazards
Objective 4A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 5: Enhance and improve coordination and communication between local, state, and federal levels of government, as well as businesses, Non‐
Governmental Organizations, and other private sector entities.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
323
Objective 5A: Continue the promotion of partnerships with federal, state, and local entities to develop successful mitigation plans and operational
strategies. Work towards a common comprehensive emergency operations plan that can be utilized on a larger regional platform.
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
5A1 Continue affording the opportunity for City Staff to attend or join
emergency management associations like Lakes Area Emergency
Management Planning Group, MEMA (Metropolitan Emergency
Managers Association) and AMEM (Association of Minnesota
Emergency Managers)
LE, HCEM,
State and
Local
Affiliates
20K Long Ongoing 1 1
5A2 Continue participation in multi‐jurisdictional / multiagency
tabletop, drill, and full‐scale exercises
EM Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
5A3 Research and implement lessons learned from actual hazardous
events from local, regional, and national jurisdictions to avoid
probable mistakes from repeating themselves
EM Undetermined Ongoing Ongoing Low 1
Goal 6: Promote disaster‐resistant future development throughout the county by reconsidering future development in high‐risk areas.
Objective 6A:
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 7: Support local communities’ capacity and ability to mitigate against natural disasters in becoming more resilient and sustainable.
Objective 7A: Bury Power Lines
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
7A1 Work with the community to identify power lines which could be
buried to reduce power failures
LE, City
Staff, City
Council,
Zoning,
Xcel Energy
500K Long Ongoing 3 1, 4, 5
Goal 8: Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and those with access and functional needs.
Objective 8A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 9: Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy, and the environment
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
324
Objective 9A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
Goal 10: Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and critical infrastructure in becoming more resistant to
failure and resilient to natural hazards
Objective 10A
Action Description Agency
Responsible
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Timeline
Status Priority Funding
Sources
None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
325
Woodland 2018 – 2024 Mitigation Strategies Progress Report
OBJECTIVE: 2A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions
Project Title/Action 2A1: Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard mitigation
actions
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 2A2: Provide information to the public on the city website and through
public education opportunities
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency LE, City Staff
OBJECTIVE: 2B: Promote partnerships between the state, counties, local jurisdictions, and partner agencies to
identify, prioritize, and implement mitigation actions
Project Title/Action 2B1: Participate as a member in local or regional hazard mitigation
planning group
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 2B2: Support or provide the public sector events, workshop, symposium,
and continued education opportunities
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency LE, City Staff
OBJECTIVE: 5A: Continue the promotion of partnerships with federal, state, and local entities to develop
successful mitigation plans and operational strategies. Work towards a common comprehensive emergency
operations plan that can be utilized on a larger regional platform
Project Title/Action 5A1: Continue affording the opportunity for City Staff to attend or join
emergency management associations like Lakes Area Emergency Planning
Group, MEMA, and AMEM
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 5A2: Continue participation in multi‐jurisdictional / multi‐agency tabletop,
drill, and full‐scale exercises
Project Status On‐Schedule
Project Title/Action 5A3: Research and implement lessons learned from actual hazardous
events from local, regional, and national jurisdictions to avoid probable
mistakes from repeating themselves
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency LE, HCEM, State and Local Affiliates.
OBJECTIVE: 7A: Bury Power Lines
Project Title/Action 7A1: Work with the community to identify power lines which could be
buried to reduce power failures
Project Status On‐Schedule
Responsible Agency LE, City Staff, City Council, Zoning, Xcel Energy
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
326
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
327
3.3.48. HENNEPIN COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
A. Hennepin County Objectives and Actions
Goal
1
Minimize loss of life, injury, and damage to property, the economy, and the environment
from natural and man‐made hazards.
OBJECTIVES ACTIONS
1A: Improve or Install sensor systems 1A1: Implementing monitoring mechanisms/procedures (i.e.,
visual inspection and the installation of electronic monitoring
systems).
1A2: Develop and maintain a countywide network of stream
stage sensors designed to measure stream height and transmit
data automatically.
1A3: Install a network of remote sensors, which provide highly
accurate, near real‐time measurements of weather, soil and
water conditions to help emergency leaders make critical public
warning and tactical decisions.
1A4: Install a countywide lightning detection system to warn
populations participating in outdoor recreational activities such
as parks, sports venues and outdoor special events.
1A5: Install a network of Wet Bulb Globe (WBGT) sensors in
order to enhance public warning messaging as well as protect
human life and property.
1A6: Install a network of freezing rain sensors that detect the
presence of icing conditions so that appropriate actions can be
taken to prevent damage to power and communication lines,
transportation systems such as mass transit and to warn of road
hazards.
1B: Assess, survey and recommend
mitigation actions
1B1: Conduct landslide hazard analysis and assessment.
1B2: Completing an inventory of locations where critical facilities,
other buildings and infrastructure are vulnerable to landslides
1B3: Elevating roads and bridges above the base flood elevation
to maintain dry access.
1C: Improve conditions for At‐Risk
populations
1C1: Identifying specific at‐risk populations that may be
exceptionally vulnerable in the event of long‐term power
outages.
1D: Improve flood resilience. 1D1: Using small construction projects such as walls and berms in
areas that cannot be mitigated through non‐structural activities.
Additionally using materials on existing riverbanks for flood
protection.
Goal
2
Increase education, outreach, and awareness.
OBJECTIVES ACTIONS
2A: Improve public awareness and
outreach
2A1: Developing and implementing a multi‐hazard public
awareness program.
2A2: Conduct outreach activities to increase awareness of natural
and man‐made hazards that pose a risk to Hennepin County.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
328
2A3: Promote the use of National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) weather radios.
2A4: Conduct tornado/severe weather table‐top drills for school
districts within Hennepin County.
2A5: Conduct winter weather table‐top drills for school districts
within Hennepin County.
2A6: Support Severe Weather Awareness Week.
2A7: Establishing an interactive website for educating the public
on hazard mitigation and preparedness measures.
Goal
3
Identify areas of greatest impact from hazards.
OBJECTIVES ACTIONS
3A: Develop partnerships, participate in
programs and Identify various risks that
need to be addressed not already
documented
3A1: Develop and maintain a County Community Wildfire
Protection Plan.
3A2: Participate in the NFPA’s Firewise Program.
3A3: Develop a historic database of natural and man‐made
hazards that post a risk to Hennepin County.
3A4: Identifying the most at‐risk critical facilities and evaluating
potential mitigation techniques.
3A5: Develop and maintaining a database to track community
vulnerability (i.e., exposure in known hazard areas).
3B: Improve Flood Risk Assessment Specifically incorporating technology and procedure to better
track high water marks, using GIS in conjunction with developed
plans to aid in historical flood impact and analysis of future
impact. Future mitigation projects may include reimplementation
of a river gauge local to the confluence of the Minnesota and
Mississippi rivers.
Goal
4
Build and support local capacity and commitment to become less vulnerable to hazards.
OBJECTIVES ACTIONS
4A: Build disaster Cache 4A1: Develop a countywide disaster caches to build local capacity
in the immediate aftermath of an incident/disaster.
4B: Improve Comprehensive Plans 4B1: Incorporating risk assessment and hazard mitigation
principles into comprehensive planning efforts.
4C: Improve Recovery Plan 4C1: Developing a recovery plan to facilitate decision making
following a hazard event/disaster.
4D: Map and Assess Vulnerability to
Landlslides
4D1: Based on data and recommendations from the 2020
Hennepin County Landslide Hazard Atlas, the Fort Snelling area
along the Mississippi River gorge is vulnerable to sudden
landslides that are difficult to predict (p. 21). Systems and tools to
monitor land movement, as well as better systems to log and
share information on landslide hazards are possible mitigation
projects. Specific areas along the Mississippi River gorge are
identified in the Landslide Hazard Atlas.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
329
LS‐3 Preventing Impacts to Roadways identifies implementing
monitoring tools and stabilization measures along roadways to
mitigate risk to landslides. The vulnerable areas along the
Mississippi River Gorge in Hennepin County are predominantly
traveled by trail, and areas can use these same mitigation
measures along traveled routes
Goal
5
Enhance hazard mitigation coordination and communication with federal, state and local
governments.
OBJECTIVES ACTIONS
None None
Goal
6
Promote disaster‐resistant future development.
OBJECTIVES ACTIONS
None None
Goal
7
Build and support local capacity and commitment to become less vulnerable to hazards.
OBJECTIVES ACTIONS
None None
Goal
8
Identify mitigation strategies for underserved communities, vulnerable populations, and
those with access and functional needs.
OBJECTIVES ACTIONS
None None
Goal
9
Mitigate against the potential impacts of climate change on local communities, the economy,
and the environment.
OBJECTIVES ACTIONS
None None
Goal
10
Enhance and improve the capability, capacity, and reliability of community lifelines and
critical infrastructure in becoming more resistant to failure and resilient to natural hazards.
OBJECTIVES ACTIONS
None None
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
330
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
331
Section 4 Minnesota Mitigation Crosswalk
4.1 Minnesota Crosswalk – Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Review Tool
The Local MiƟgaƟon Plan Review Tool (PRT) demonstrates how the local miƟgaƟon plan meets the
regulaƟon in 44 CFR § 201.6 and offers states and FEMA MiƟgaƟon Planners an opportunity to provide
feedback to the local governments, including special districts.
1. The MulƟ‐JurisdicƟonal Summary Sheet is a worksheet that is used to document how each jurisdicƟon
met the requirements of the plan elements (Planning Process; Risk Assessment; MiƟgaƟon Strategy;
Plan Maintenance; Plan Update; and Plan AdopƟon).
2. The Plan Review Checklist summarizes FEMA’s evaluaƟon of whether the plan has addressed all
requirements.
Plan InformaƟon
JurisdicƟon(s) Hennepin County
Title of Plan Hennepin County MulƟ‐JurisdicƟon MiƟgaƟon
Plan
New Plan or Update Update
Single or MulƟ‐JurisdicƟon MulƟ‐JurisdicƟon
Date of Plan January 15, 2024
Local Point of Contact
Title Bruce Kelii, Deputy Director of Emergency
Management
Agency Hennepin County Hennepin County
Address 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN
Phone Number
Email Bruce.Kelii@Hennepin.US
AddiƟonal Point of Contact
Title Dalton Herding, Senior Planner
Agency Hennepin County Emergency Management
Address 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN
Phone Number
Email Dalton.Herding@Hennepin.US
Review InformaƟon
State Review
State Reviewer(s) and Title
State Review Date
FEMA Review
FEMA Reviewer(s) and Title
Date Received in FEMA Region
Plan Not Approved
Plan Approvable Pending AdopƟon
Plan Approved
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
332
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
333
4.1.1 REGULATION CHECKLIST
The Plan Review Checklist is completed by FEMA. States and local governments are encouraged, but not
required, to use the PRT as a checklist to ensure all requirements have been met prior to submiƫng the
plan for review and approval. The purpose of the checklist is to idenƟfy the locaƟon of relevant or applicable
content in the plan by element/sub‐element and to determine if each requirement has been “met” or “not
met.” FEMA completes the “required revisions” summary at the boƩom of each element to clearly explain
the revisions that are required for plan approval. Required revisions must be explained for each plan sub‐
element that is “not met.” Sub‐elements in each summary should be referenced using the appropriate
numbers (A1, B3, etc.), where applicable. Requirements for each element and sub‐element are described
in detail in SecƟon 4: Local Plan Requirements of this guide.
Plan updates must include informaƟon from the current planning process.
If some elements of the plan do not require an update, due to minimal or no changes between updates,
the plan must document the reasons for that.
MulƟ‐jurisdicƟonal elements must cover informaƟon unique to all parƟcipaƟng jurisdicƟons.
Element A: Planning Process
Element A Requirements LocaƟon in Plan Met / Not Met
A1. Does the plan document the planning process, including how it was prepared and who was
involved in the process for each jurisdicƟon? (Requirement 44 CFR § 201.6(c)(1))
A1‐a. Does the plan document how the plan was
prepared, including the schedule or Ɵme frame and
acƟviƟes that made up the plan’s development, as
well as who was involved?
Volume 1, pages 15 ‐ 25
A1‐b. Does the plan list the jurisdicƟon(s)
parƟcipaƟng in the plan that seek approval, and
describe how they parƟcipated in the planning
process?
Volume 1, pages 15 ‐ 25
A2. Does the plan document an opportunity for neighboring communiƟes, local and regional agencies
involved in hazard miƟgaƟon acƟviƟes, and agencies that have the authority to regulate development
as well as businesses, academia, and other private and non‐profit interests to be involved in the
planning process? (Requirement 44 CFR § 201.6(b)(2))
A2‐a. Does the plan idenƟfy all stakeholders
involved or given an opportunity to be involved in
the planning process, and how each stakeholder
was presented with this opportunity?
Volume 1, page 21 ‐ 22
A3. Does the plan document how the public was involved in the planning process during the draŌing
stage and prior to plan approval? (Requirement 44 CFR § 201.6(b)(1))
A3‐a. Does the plan document how the public was
given the opportunity to be involved in the
planning process and how their feedback was
included in the plan?
Volume 1, pages 31 ‐ 32
A4. Does the plan describe the review and incorporaƟon of exisƟng plans, studies, reports, and
technical informaƟon? (Requirement 44 CFR § 201.6(b)(3))
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
334
A4‐a. Does the plan document what exisƟng plans,
studies, reports, and technical informaƟon were
reviewed for the development of the plan, as well
as how they were incorporated into the document?
Volume 1, pages 26 – 27, 59
ELEMENT A REQUIRED REVISIONS
Required Revision:
Element B: Risk Assessment
Element B Requirements LocaƟon in Plan Met / Not Met
B1. Does the plan include a descripƟon of the type, locaƟon, and extent of all natural hazards that can
affect the jurisdicƟon? Does the plan also include informaƟon on previous occurrences of hazard
events and on the probability of future hazard events? (Requirement 44 CFR § 201.6(c)(2)(i))
B1‐a. Does the plan describe all natural hazards
that can affect the jurisdicƟon(s) in the planning
area, and does it provide the raƟonale if omiƫng
any natural hazards that are commonly recognized
to affect the jurisdicƟon(s) in the planning area?
Volume 2, page 5 ‐ 7
B1‐b. Does the plan include informaƟon on the
locaƟon of each idenƟfied hazard?
Volume 1, pages 93, and 100
Volume 2, pages
Volume 2, pages 212 – 228
B1‐c. Does the plan describe the extent for each
idenƟfied hazard?
Volume 2, pages 15, 20, 24,
30, 34, 40, 56, 73 – 74, 85,
99, 112, 129, 132, 143, 153,
159, 171, 188, 204
B1‐d. Does the plan include the history of previous
hazard events for each idenƟfied hazard?
Volume 2, pages 15, 20, 25,
30 – 31, 34, 40 – 41, 56 ‐ 58,
75 – 77, 86 – 91, 113 – 114,
120 – 125, 133 ‐ 135, 144 ‐
145, 154, 159, 170 – 175, 187
– 194, 204 ‐ 207
B1‐e. Does the plan include the probability of
future events for each idenƟfied hazard? Does the
plan describe the effects of future condiƟons,
including climate change (e.g., long‐term weather
paƩerns, average temperature and sea levels), on
the type, locaƟon and range of anƟcipated
intensiƟes of idenƟfied hazards?
Volume 2, pages 16, 20, 25 ‐
26, 31, 35, 41, 57, 77, 91 –
92, 102, 114, 126, 133, 135 –
136, 145 ‐ 146, 154, 162 ‐
163, 175 – 176, 194 ‐ 195,
207
B1‐f. For parƟcipaƟng jurisdicƟons in a mulƟ‐
jurisdicƟonal plan, does the plan describe any
hazards that are unique to and/or vary from those
affecƟng the overall planning area?
N/A
B2. Does the plan include a summary of the jurisdicƟon’s vulnerability and the impacts on the
community from the idenƟfied hazards? Does this summary also address NFIP insured structures that
have been repeƟƟvely damaged by floods? (Requirement 44 CFR § 201.6(c)(2)(ii))
B2‐a. Does the plan provide an overall summary of
each jurisdicƟon’s vulnerability to the idenƟfied
hazards?
Volume 2, pages 13 ‐ 209,
244 ‐ 358
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
335
B2‐b. For each parƟcipaƟng jurisdicƟon, does the
plan describe the potenƟal impacts of each of the
idenƟfied hazards on each parƟcipaƟng
jurisdicƟon?
Volume 2, pages 13 – 15, 19 –
20, 23 – 24, 29 – 30, 33 – 34,
39, 54 – 56, 71 – 72, 82 – 84,
97 – 98, 110 – 112, 118 –
119, 131 – 132, 143, 151 –
152, 158, 168 – 170, 182 –
184, 201 – 203
.B2‐c. Does the plan address NFIP‐insured
structures within each jurisdicƟon that have been
repeƟƟvely damaged by floods?
Volume 1, page 53 ‐ 54
ELEMENT B REQUIRED REVISIONS
Required Revision:
Element C: MiƟgaƟon Strategy
Element C Requirements LocaƟon in Plan Met / Not Met
C1. Does the plan document each parƟcipant’s exisƟng authoriƟes, policies, programs and resources
and its ability to expand on and improve these exisƟng policies and programs? (Requirement 44 CFR §
201.6(c)(3))
C1‐a. Does the plan describe how the exisƟng
capabiliƟes of each parƟcipant are available to
support the miƟgaƟon strategy? Does this include a
discussion of the exisƟng building codes and land
use and development ordinances or regulaƟons?
Volume 1, pages 43 ‐ 48
C1‐b. Does the plan describe each parƟcipant’s
ability to expand and improve the idenƟfied
capabiliƟes to achieve miƟgaƟon?
Volume 1, page 43
C2. Does the plan address each jurisdicƟon’s parƟcipaƟon in the NFIP and conƟnued compliance with
NFIP requirements, as appropriate? (Requirement 44 CFR § 201.6(c)(3)(ii))
C2‐a. Does the plan contain a narraƟve descripƟon
or a table/list of their parƟcipaƟon acƟviƟes?
Volume 1, pages 49 ‐ 52
C3. Does the plan include goals to reduce/avoid long‐term vulnerabiliƟes to the idenƟfied hazards?
(Requirement 44 CFR § 201.6(c)(3)(i))
C3‐a. Does the plan include goals to reduce the risk
from the hazards idenƟfied in the plan?
Volume 3, page 8
C4. Does the plan idenƟfy and analyze a comprehensive range of specific miƟgaƟon acƟons and
projects for each jurisdicƟon being considered to reduce the effects of hazards, with emphasis on new
and exisƟng buildings and infrastructure? (Requirement 44 CFR § 201.6(c)(3)(ii))
C4‐a. Does the plan include an analysis of a
comprehensive range of acƟons/projects that each
jurisdicƟon considered to reduce the impacts of
hazards idenƟfied in the risk assessment?
Volume 3, pages 14 ‐ 322
C4‐b. Does the plan include one or more acƟon(s)
per jurisdicƟon for each of the hazards as idenƟfied
within the plan’s risk assessment?
Volume 3, pages 14 ‐ 322
C5. Does the plan contain an acƟon plan that describes how the acƟons idenƟfied will be prioriƟzed
(including a cost benefit review), implemented, and administered by each jurisdicƟon? (Requirement
44 CFR § 201.6(c)(3)(iv)); (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(iii))
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
336
C5‐a. Does the plan describe the criteria used for
prioriƟzing acƟons?
Volume 3, page 10
C5‐b. Does the plan provide the posiƟon, office,
department or agency responsible for
implemenƟng/administraƟng the idenƟfied
miƟgaƟon acƟons, as well as potenƟal funding
sources and expected Ɵme frame?
Volume 3, pages 12 ‐ 322
ELEMENT C REQUIRED REVISIONS
Required Revision:
Element D: Plan Maintenance
Element D Requirements LocaƟon in Plan Met / Not Met
D1. Is there discussion of how each community will conƟnue public parƟcipaƟon in the plan
maintenance process? (Requirement 44 CFR § 201.6(c)(4)(iii))
D1‐a. Does the plan describe how communiƟes will
conƟnue to seek future public parƟcipaƟon aŌer
the plan has been approved?
Volume 1, pages 58 ‐ 59
D2. Is there a descripƟon of the method and schedule for keeping the plan current (monitoring,
evaluaƟng and updaƟng the miƟgaƟon plan within a five‐year cycle)? (Requirement 44 CFR §
201.6(c)(4)(i))
D2‐a. Does the plan describe the process that will
be followed to track the progress/status of the
miƟgaƟon acƟons idenƟfied within the MiƟgaƟon
Strategy, along with when this process will occur
and who will be responsible for the process?
Volume 1, page 56
D2‐b. Does the plan describe the process that will
be followed to evaluate the plan for effecƟveness?
This process must idenƟfy the criteria that will be
used to evaluate the informaƟon in the plan, along
with when this process will occur and who will be
responsible.
Vo lume 1, page 56 ‐ 57
D2‐c. Does the plan describe the process that will
be followed to update the plan, along with when
this process will occur and who will be responsible
for the process?
Volume 1, pages 57 ‐ 58
D3. Does the plan describe a process by which each community will integrate the requirements of the
miƟgaƟon plan into other planning mechanisms, such as comprehensive or capital improvement
plans, when appropriate? (Requirement 44 CFR § 201.6(c)(4)(ii))
D3‐a. Does the plan describe the process the
community will follow to integrate the ideas,
informaƟon, and strategy of the miƟgaƟon plan into
other planning mechanisms?
Volume 1, page 59 – 61
D3‐b. Does the plan idenƟfy the planning
mechanisms for each plan parƟcipant into which
the ideas, informaƟon and strategy from the
miƟgaƟon plan may be integrated?
Volume 1, page 59 ‐ 61
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
337
D3‐c. For mulƟ‐jurisdicƟonal plans, does the plan
describe each parƟcipant's individual process for
integraƟng informaƟon from the miƟgaƟon strategy
into their idenƟfied planning mechanisms?
Volume 1, page 59 ‐ 61
ELEMENT D REQUIRED REVISIONS
Required Revision:
Element E: Plan Update
Element E Requirements LocaƟon in Plan Met / Not Met
E1. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in development? (Requirement 44 CFR § 201.6(d)(3))
E1‐a. Does the plan describe the changes in
development that have occurred in hazard‐prone
areas that have increased or decreased each
community’s vulnerability since the previous plan
was approved?
Volume 1, page 41, 114 ‐ 118
E2. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in prioriƟes and progress in local miƟgaƟon efforts?
(Requirement 44 CFR § 201.6(d)(3))
E2‐a. Does the plan describe how it was revised due
to changes in community prioriƟes?
Volume 3, pages 10 ‐ 323
E2‐b. Does the plan include a status update for all
miƟgaƟon acƟons idenƟfied in the previous
miƟgaƟon plan?
Volume 3, pages 14 ‐ 323
E2‐c. Does the plan describe how jurisdicƟons
integrated the miƟgaƟon plan, when appropriate,
into other planning mechanisms?
Volume 1, page 59 ‐ 61
ELEMENT E REQUIRED REVISIONS
Required Revision:
Element F: Plan AdopƟon
Element E Requirements LocaƟon in Plan Met / Not Met
F1. For single‐jurisdicƟonal plans, has the governing body of the jurisdicƟon formally adopted the plan
to be eligible for certain FEMA assistance? (Requirement 44 CFR § 201.6(c)(5))
F1‐a. Does the parƟcipant include documentaƟon
of adopƟon?
Volume 3, Appendices B and
D
Volume 1, Page 11
F2. For mulƟ‐jurisdicƟonal plans, has the governing body of each jurisdicƟon officially adopted the
plan to be eligible for certain FEMA assistance? (Requirement 44 CFR § 201.6(c)(5))
F2‐a. Did each parƟcipant adopt the plan and
provide documentaƟon of that adopƟon?
Volume 3, Appendix D
Volume 1, Page 11
ELEMENT F REQUIRED REVISIONS
Required Revision:
Element G: High Hazard PotenƟal Dams (OpƟonal)
Element G Requirements LocaƟon in Plan Met / Not Met
No High Hazard PotenƟal Dams IdenƟfied in Hennepin County
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
338
Element H: AddiƟonal State Requirements (OpƟonal)
Element H Requirements LocaƟon in Plan Met / Not Met
No AddiƟonal State Requirements IdenƟfied
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
339
4.1.2. MULTI‐JURISDICTIONAL SUMMARY SHEET
INSTRUCTIONS: Complete the Multi‐jurisdiction Summary Spreadsheet by listing each participating
jurisdiction which required Elements for each jurisdiction were ‘Met’ or ‘Not Met’. Adoption resolutions
may be tracked after the plan was reviewed by FEMA ‘pending local adoption’. This Summary Sheet does
not imply that a mini‐plan be developed for each jurisdiction; it should be used as an optional worksheet
to ensure that each jurisdiction participating in the Plan has been documented and has met the
requirements for those Elements (A through E).
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(county/city)
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identification
& Risk
Assessment
C. Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan Review,
Evaluation &
Implementation
E.
Plan Adoption
1 Bloomington City Y Y Y Y
2 Brooklyn
Center City Y Y Y Y
3 Brooklyn Park City Y Y Y Y
4 Champlin City Y Y Y Y
5 Chanhassen City Y Y Y Y
6 Corocoran City Y Y Y Y
7 Crystal City Y Y Y Y
8 Dayton City Y Y Y Y
9 Deephaven City Y Y Y Y
10 Eden Prairie City Y Y Y Y
11 Edina City Y Y Y Y
12 Excelsior City Y Y Y Y
13 Fort Snelling Unincorporated
area
Y Y Y Y
14 Golden Valley City Y Y Y Y
15 Greenfield City Y Y Y Y
16 Greenwood City Y Y Y Y
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
340
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(county/city)
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identification
& Risk
Assessment
C. Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan Review,
Evaluation &
Implementation
E.
Plan Adoption
17 Hanover City Y Y Y Y
18 Hopkins City Y Y Y Y
19 Independence City Y Y Y Y
20 Long Lake City Y Y Y Y
21 Loretto City Y Y Y Y
22 Maple Grove City Y Y Y Y
23 Maple Plain City Y Y Y Y
24 Medicine Lake City Y Y N Y
25 Medina City Y Y Y Y
26 Minneapolis City Y Y Y Y
27 Minnetonka
Beach City Y Y Y Y
28 Minnetonka City Y Y Y Y
29 Minnetrista City Y Y Y Y
30 Mound City Y Y Y Y
31 New Hope City Y Y Y Y
32 Orono City Y Y Y Y
33 Osseo City Y Y Y Y
34 Plymouth City Y Y Y Y
35 Richfield City Y Y Y Y
36 Robbinsdale City Y Y Y Y
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
341
# Jurisdiction
Name
Jurisdiction
Type
(county/city)
Requirements Met (Y/N)
A.
Planning
Process
B.
Hazard
Identification
& Risk
Assessment
C. Mitigation
Strategy
D.
Plan Review,
Evaluation &
Implementation
E.
Plan Adoption
37 Rockford City Y Y Y Y
38 Rogers City Y Y Y Y
39 Shorewood City Y Y Y Y
40 Spring Park City Y Y Y Y
41 St. Anthony City Y Y Y Y
42 St. Bonifacius City Y Y Y Y
43 St. Louis Park City Y Y Y Y
44 Tonka Bay City Y Y Y Y
45 Wayzata City Y Y Y Y
46 Woodland City Y Y Y Y
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
342
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
343
5.1. Acronyms and Abbreviations
ADA American Disabilities Act
ADT Animal Disease Traceability
APHIS Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
CAPE Convective Available Potential Energy
CDBG Community Development Block Grant
CDC Centers for Disease Control
CDFA California Drug and Food Administration
CERT Community Emergency Response Team
CFI Critical Facilities Index
CFR Code of Federal Regulation
COOP Cooperative Observer Program
CPR Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
CRS Community Rating Scheme
DMA Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000
DPH Department of Health
DNR Department of Natural Resources
EDI Emerging Disease Investigations
EF Enhanced Fujita Scale
EID Emerging Infectious Disease
EM Emergency Manager
EML Elevated Mixed Layer
EMRS Emergency Management Response System
EOC Emergency Operations Center
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FAD Foreign Animal Disease
FBP Forest Behavior Prediction
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Administration
FMA Flood Mitigation Assistance Program
FPI Fire Potential Index
FWI Fire Weather Index
GEOREF Geographical Reference
GIS Geographic Information System
GLS Gray Leaf Spot
HACCP Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point
HAZMAT Hazardous Materials
HAZUS Hazards United States
HAZUS‐MH Hazards United States‐ Multi Hazard
HCEM Hennepin County Emergency Management
HEPA High Efficiency Particulate Air
HMGP Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
HSEM Homeland Security Emergency Management‐ Minnesota
HWO Hazardous Weather Outlook
ICS Incident Command System
IFR Interim Final Rule
SECTION 5 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
344
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
LAT‐LONG Latitude and Longitude
MAP Mitigation Action Plan
MD Mesoscale Discussion
MEDSS Minnesota Electronic Disease Surveillance System
MGRS Military Grid Reference System
MJHMP Multi‐Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
MNICS Minnesota Incident Command System
MPRB Minneapolis Parks and Recreation Board
MSP Minneapolis/St. Paul
NAHERC National Animal Health Emergency Response Corp
NAHSS National Animal Health Surveillance System
NASA National Aeronautics Space Administration
NDRF National Disaster Recovery Framework
NFDRS National Fire Danger Rating System
NFIP National Flood Insurance Program
NHL National Historic Landmarks
NIDIS National Integrated Drought Information System
NIFC National Interagency Fire Center
NPIC National Preparedness and Incident Coordination Center
NVAP National Veterinary Accreditation Program
NWS National Weather Service
PDM Pre‐Disaster Mitigation Program
PIC Preparedness and Incident Coordination
POD Point of Dispensing
PRI Priority Risk Index
REMPRC Regional Emergency Management Planning Reference Collection
RF Radio Frequency
RH Relative Humidity
SBA Small Business Administration
SMS Situation Monitoring Station
SOP Standard Operating Procedure
SPC Storm Prediction Center
SPRS Surveillance, Preparedness and Response Services
UC‐ANR University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources
USDA US Dept. of Agriculture
USFA United States Fire Administration
USNG United States National Grid
UTC Coordinated Universal Time
UTM Universal Transverse Mercator
VS Veterinary Services
VSMS Vital Situation Monitoring Station
WBGT Wet Bulb Globe Temperature
WEA Wireless Emergency Alerts
WFAS Wildland Fire Assessment System
WFO Weather Forecast Office
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
345
6.1. Terms
Multi‐Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan‐ a countywide plan that identifies risks and ways to minimize
damage by natural and manmade disasters. The plan is a comprehensive resource document that serves
many purposes such as enhancing public awareness, creating a decision tool for management, promoting
compliance with State and Federal program requirements, enhancing local policies for hazard mitigation
capability, and providing inter‐jurisdictional coordination.
Area Planning Group‐ One of four groups in Hennepin County divided by region that meet routinely to
gather information, discuss issues, develop goals, prioritize goals, create approaches, prioritize
approaches, and develop plans. Each step is necessary to the overall development and creation of the
regional or jurisdictional plan.
Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA 2000)‐ is Public Law 106‐390, also called DMA2K, is U.S. federal legislation
passed in 2000 that amended provisions of the United States Code related to disaster relief. The amended
provisions are named after Robert Stafford, who led the passage of the Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act of 1988.
Hazard Mitigation Program Grant ‐ to help communities implement hazard mitigation measures following
a Presidential major disaster declaration. Hazard mitigation is any action taken to reduce or eliminate long
term risk to people and property from natural hazards. The HMPG is authorized under Section 404 of the
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act.
Incident Action Plan‐ a written plan that defines the incident objectives and reflects the tactics necessary
to manage an incident during an operational period.
Operational Period‐ An operational period is the period of time scheduled for executing a given set of
operational actions. The length of the operational period is typically 12 to 24 hours.
Planning Team‐ A team whose members usually belong to different groups, functions and are assigned to
activities for the same project.
Public Law 106‐390‐ to establish a national disaster hazard mitigation program— (1) to reduce the loss of
life and property, human suffering, economic disruption, and disaster assistance costs resulting from
natural disasters; and (2) to provide a source of pre‐disaster hazard mitigation funding that will assist States
and local governments (including Indian tribes) in implementing effective hazard mitigation measures that
are designed to ensure the continued functionality of critical services and facilities after a natural disaster.
Risk Assessment‐ is the determination of quantitative or qualitative estimate of risk related to a well‐
defined situation and a recognized threat (also called hazard assessment).
Social Media‐ are computer‐mediated tools that allow people or companies to create, share, or exchange
information, career interests, ideas, and pictures/videos in virtual communities and networks.
Steering Committee‐ a committee that provides guidance, direction and control to a project within an
organization.
SECTION 6 GLOSSARY
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
346
Vulnerability Assessment‐ the process of identifying, quantifying, and prioritizing (or ranking) the
vulnerabilities in a system.
Whole Community‐ an approach to emergency management that reinforces the fact that FEMA is only one
part of our nation’s emergency management team; that we must leverage all the resources of our collective
team in preparing for, protecting against, responding to, recovering from and mitigating against all hazards;
and that collectively we must meet the needs of the entire community in each of these areas.
Working Group‐ is an ad hoc group of subject‐matter experts working together to achieve specified goals.
Title 44 CFR Part 201‐ Identification name for Emergency Management and Assistance‐ specifically
Mitigation Planning within the Code of Federal Regulation. (1)‐The purpose of this part is to provide
information on the policies and procedures for mitigation planning as required by the provisions of section
322 of the Stafford Act, 42 U.S.C. 5165. (2)‐The purpose of mitigation planning is for State, local, and Indian
tribal governments to identify the natural hazards that impact them, to identify actions and activities to
reduce any losses from those hazards, and to establish a coordinated process to implement the plan, taking
advantage of a wide range of resources.
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
347
SECTION 7 APPENDICES
APPENDIX A APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATIONS
A. The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act), as amended by
the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, provides the legal basis for state, tribal, and local governments
to undertake risk‐based approaches to reducing natural hazard risks through mitigation planning.
Specifically, the Stafford Act requires state, tribal, and local governments to develop and adopt
FEMA‐approved hazard mitigation plans as a condition for receiving certain types of non‐
emergency disaster assistance.
B. Another law relevant to hazard mitigation planning is the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as
amended (42 U.S.C. § 4104c), which authorizes the Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) grant
program with the goal of reducing or eliminating claims under the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP). FMA provides funding to states, territories, federally recognized tribes, and local
communities for flood hazard mitigation projects, plan development, and management costs.
C. Title 44, Chapter 1, Part 201 (44 CFR Part 201) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) contains
requirements and procedures to implement the hazard mitigation planning provisions of the
Stafford Act.
D. FEMA policies are external, authoritative statements that articulate the Agency's intent and
direction to guide decision‐making and achieve rational outcomes for Agency activities. The
following mitigation planning guidance documents constitute FEMA’s official policy on and
interpretation of the hazard mitigation planning requirements in 44 CFR Part 201.
State Mitigation Plan Review Guide
Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide (English)
Tribal Multi‐Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance
Additional mitigation planning policies include:
State Mitigation Plan Review Guide Policy (FP 302‐094‐2, March 6, 2015)
Mitigation Planning (MT‐PL) Memorandum #15: Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide
(September 30, 2011)
Mitigation Planning Memorandum (MT‐PL) #1A: Implementation Procedures for States,
Territories and Indian Tribal Governments Without an Approved State Mitigation Plan ‐
Follow‐up Guidance (Attachment) (May 2, 2005)
Mitigation Planning Memorandum (MT‐PL) #1: Disaster Declaration Procedures After May 1,
2005, for States Without an Approved State Mitigation Plan (April 13, 2005)
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
348
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
349
APPENDIX B HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADOPTION F1a
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
350
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
351
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
352
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
353
APPENDIX C FEMA APPROVAL
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
354
2024 Hennepin County All‐Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
Volume 3 – Community Mitigation Strategies
355
APPENDIX D MUNICIPAL AND LOCAL AGENCY ADOPTIONS F1a, F2a
C ouncil R egular M eeng
DAT E:10/14/2024
TO :C ity C ouncil
F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager
T H R O U G H :N/A
BY:M ayor G raves
S U B J E C T:P roclama-on Recognizing O pen H ands, I nc. for their 25th A nnivers ary on O ctober 5,
2024
Requested Council A con:
B ackground:
B udget I ssues:
I nclusive C ommunity Engagement:
A nracist/Equity Policy Effect:
AT TA C H M E N TS :
D escrip-on U pload D ate Type
P roclama-on 10/11/2024 P roclama-on
PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING OPEN HANDS, INC.
FOR THEIR 25TH ANNIVERSARY ON OCTOBER 5, 2024
WHEREAS, Open Hands., Inc. is a small business in Brooklyn Center that owns two group homes
for vulnerable adults; and
WHEREAS, Open Hands, Inc., goal and vision is to empower individuals with the skills necessary
to become self-sufficient and live independently by providing daily living assistance
and specialized care in a group home setting for individuals with a wide-array of needs;
and
WHEREAS, Open Hands homes are staffed 24-hours a day to ensure that individuals receive the
support needed, and are grateful for the opportunity to serve the Brooklyn Center
community; and
WHEREAS, the longevity of Open Hand, Inc. has allowed then to work with numerous individuals,
providing valuable experience in dealing with a wide range of personal needs, goals,
and challenges; and
WHEREAS, Open Hands, Inc. empower individuals with skills they will need to live as
independently as possible; and
WHEREAS, Open Hands, Inc. has successfully assisted many clients in developing the essential
skills needed for self-sufficiency who have gone on to live independently and become
productive members of society.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, April Graves, Mayor of the City of Brooklyn Center, do hereby recognizing
Open Hands, Inc. for their 25th Anniversary on October 5, 2024.
October 14, 2024
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
C ouncil R egular M eeng
DAT E:10/14/2024
TO :C ity C ouncil
F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager
T H R O U G H :J esse A nders on, C ommunity D evelopment D irector
BY:X iong Thao, H ous ing and Community S tandard M anager
S U B J E C T:P roposed S pecial A s s essments for Nuisance A batement C os ts , A dminis tra2ve
F ines /C ita2ons , Tall G rass and Weed A batement C os ts , D ead D isease Tree A batement
C os ts , and A dministra2vely Registered Vacant P roper2es
Requested Council A con:
- Moon to:
· Open the public hearings concurrently;
· Take public input; and
· C lose the public hearings.
- M oon to A dopt Resoluon C erfying S pecial A ssessments for A dministrave C itaons to the H ennepin
C ounty P roperty Tax Rolls
- M oon to A dopt Resoluon C erfying S pecial A ssessments for D iseased Tree Removal C osts to the
H ennepin C ounty P roperty Tax Rolls
- M o on to A dopt Resoluon C erfying S pecial A ssessments for Weed Removal C osts to the H ennepin
C ounty P roperty Tax Rolls
- M oon to A dopt Resoluon C erfying S pecial A ssessments for A batements C osts to the H ennepin C ounty
P roperty Tax Rolls
- M oon to A dopt Resoluon C erfying S pecial A ssessments for A dministravely Registered Vacant
P roperes C osts to the H ennepin C ounty P roperty Tax Rolls
B ackground:
F ive (5) P ublic H earings are scheduled for O ctober 14, 2024 to consider cer2fica2on of proposed s pecial
asses s ments . The No2ce of P ublic H earing was pos ted in the City ’s official new s paper, S un Pos t, on
S eptember 26, 2024. A ll poten2ally affected property owners have been no2fied by cer2fied mail of the
date of the P ublic H earing and the amount of the proposed s pecial asses s ments . A s of O ctober 9, 2024, no
formal appeal has not been made to City s taff.
The following is a brief summary of the minimum proces s involved in C ity-facilitated abatements.
O nce a viola2on is verified or correc2on is iden2fied, a wri?en compliance no2ce is provided to the
ow ner of record. I n addi2on to no2fying the owner of record, in certain cases , proper2es may be
pos ted or other res pons ible par2es may be no2fied.
A follow up ins pec2on is conducted to verify that the property was brought into compliance with the
code.
I f compliance has not been achieved, the city w ill s end addi2onal no2ces , or take correc2ve ac2ons to
remove the public nuis ance or haz ard, depending on the nature of the issue.
I n the case of an abatement, the city bills the ow ner of record for the por2on of costs the city
incurred directly related to the abatement ac2on. A service charge is applied to help recover
adminis tra2ve costs as s ociated w ith the abatement proces s s uch as 2me s pent on inspec2ons,
no2fica2ons, invoicing, overhead, etc.
The costs of the abatements are recorded as pending special as s essments and this informa2on is
available to the public.
W hen a property is s old, 2tle companies , real estate agents , or other par2es are obligated to conduct
property s earches to determine the pending and levied s pecial asses s ment amounts . Payments of any
pending or levied s pecial asses s ment s hould be nego2ated by the s ellers and buyers as part of the
s ales trans ac2ons .
For adminis tra2ve cita2ons/fines, an appeal proces s is pres cribed by C ity O rdinance Chapter 18.
I nforma2on about the appeal proces s and 2meframes is provided with the cita2on.
Vacant proper2es are administra2vely regis tered aDer the property has been pos ted and no2ce has been
s ent to the lis ted property owner prescribe by O rdinance sec2on 12-1504. A Der s everal no2ces, the
property is then administra2vely regis tered as a vacant building. The vacant building fee does not include
the inspec2on cost of $195. That fee will be collected w hen the property ow ner requests to have the
building inspected. A ll compliance orders must be completed before a C er2ficate of Re-O ccupancy can be
is s ued to the property ow ner.
Public H earing Process
S taff recommends that the C ity C ouncil conduct the hearings concurrently. The a?ached resolu2ons
cer2fying the asses s ments to the H ennepin County tax rolls are provided for C ouncil cons idera2on upon
clos ing of the P ublic H earings .
I f any addi2onal property ow ner files an appeal with the City Clerk prior to the P ublic H earing, or should
any pers on appear at the hearing and object to an asses s ment, staff recommends that the Council refer any
s ubs tan2ve objec2ons to staff for a report back to the C ouncil at a con2nued hearing to take place in tw o
w eeks. This w ould provide staff 2me to res earch the details of the items and assemble documenta2on for
Council's considera2on. I f any as s essments are removed from the proposed levy roll, it is recommended
that the Council consider adop2ng the remaining proposed asses s ments .
I f an appeal for a specific property is filed within district court, the C ity A?orney will advise the C ouncil of
op2ons for handling the dispute and poten2al li2ga2on is s ues.
Payment O pons available to P roperty O wners
O nce an asses s ment roll is adopted by the C ouncil, the ow ner of each property has the follow ing op2ons :
1. Pay the en2re amount of the special as s essment, w ithout interest, between O ctober 14, 2024 and
November 22, 2024.
2. I f payments are made w ith property taxes , the first payment will be due with taxes in 2025. The total
principal w ill be payable in annual installments for the period s tated on the levy roll and as indicated below.
I nteres t of 3.5 percent is accrued on the unpaid balance.
Nuis ance A batement Costs O ne Year
A dminis tra2ve F ines /C ita2ons O ne Year
Tall G rass and Weed A batements O ne Year
A dminis tra2vely Regis ter Vacant Buildings O ne Year
D ead and D is eas ed Tree A batements F ive Years
Paral prepayments:
Bas ed on feedback from the City Council, s taff had a dis cus s ion w ith H ennepin C ounty S taff regarding
par2al payments . The County has stated that aDer an asses s ment is cer2fied par2al payments can't be
accepted. H owever, they have granted Brooklyn C enter permis s ion to accept par2al payments prior to the
asses s ments being cer2fied to H ennepin C ounty.
The C er2fica2on occurs on D ecember 1 annually. Therefore, any current asses s ment could allow for the
asses s ment amount to be reduced w ith a par2al payment prior to November 22, 2024.
B udget I ssues:
T hese fees help recover some costs the C ity incurs related to services provided to specific proper2es. For
accoun2ng purposes, special assessments fees are included in the general fund as revenue. I t is an2cipated that
these costs recovered through special assessments will be received in 2025, and are therefore included in the
2025 budget.
The levy roll for adminis tra2ve fines /cita2on totals $164,350. ($183,050 - 2023 total).
The levy roll for w eed destruc2on totals $17,661.25 ($10,223.75 - 2023 total)
The levy roll for dead/diseased tree removal totals $46,160.44. ($27,157 - 2023 total)
The levy roll for abatements totals $76,399.55 ($2,742 - 2023 total)
The levy roll for adminis tra2vely registered vacant buildings totals $400.00 ($0 - 2023
total)
A n updated lis t w ill be provided at the Council M ee2ng reflec2ng payments made by O ctober 14, 2024.
I nclusive C ommunity Engagement:
A nracist/Equity Policy Effect:
S trategic Priories and Values:
Maintain and enhance public places
AT TA C H M E N TS :
D escrip2on U pload D ate Type
P ublic hearing no2ce 10/4/2024 Backup M aterial
S un Post pos2ng 10/4/2024 Backup M aterial
Res olu2ons 10/9/2024 Resolu2on Le?er
Vacant A s s essment Roll 10/9/2024 Backup M aterial
Tree A sses s ment Roll 10/9/2024 Backup M aterial
Nuis ance A batement A s s essment Roll 10/9/2024 Backup M aterial
A dminis tra2ve C ita2on A s s essment Roll 10/9/2024 Backup M aterial
Weed A batement A s s essment Roll 10/10/2024 Backup M aterial
CITY OF
BROOKLYN CENTER
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING ON
PROPOSED SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS
Notice is hereby given that the
City Council of the City of Brook-
lyn Center, Minnesota, will meet in
the Council Chambers of Brooklyn
Center City Hall at 6301 Shingle
Creek Parkway, on Monday, Octo-
ber 14, 2024 at 7 p.m. or as soon
thereafter as the matter may be
heard, to hear and pass upon any
objections to the proposed assess-
ments for the following:
DELINQUENT PUBLIC UTILITY
ACCOUNTS
Special Assessments are pro-
posed for public utility charges to
those tracts or parcels where such
charges were delinquent as of July
31, 2024, and, after due notice to
the property owner, remain unpaid,
pursuant to City Ordinances, Sec-
tion 4-105 and Section 4-201.
DELINQUENT NUISANCE
ABATEMENT ACCOUNTS
It is proposed to assess the
costs of delinquent abatement
costs to those tracts or parcels
where, pursuant to City Ordinance
Section 12-1101, 12-1206, 12-
1504 and in accordance with MS
429 and 463.251, abatement pro-
cedures were performed by order
of City Inspectors and the cost for
such abatement remains unpaid.
DELINQUENT ADMINISTRA-
TIVE FINES/CITATIONS
It is proposed to assess the
costs of delinquent administrative
fines/citations to those tracts or
parcels where, pursuant to City
Ordinance Section 18-204, 18-210
and in accordance with MS 429,
delinquent administrative fines/
citations were issued and the cost
for such fines remains unpaid.
DISEASED TREE REMOVAL
COSTS
It is proposed to assess the cost
of diseased tree removal to those
tracts or parcels where trees were
removed by written agreement
with the property owner or by or-
der of the City Council pursuant to
City Ordinances, Section 20-301
through 20-305 and in accordance
with MS 429.
DELINQUENT WEED REMOVAL
ACCOUNTS
It is proposed to assess the
cost of noxious weed destruction
to those tracts or parcels where,
pursuant to City Ordinance Section
19-1601 through 19-1604 and in
accordance with MS 429, noxious
weeds were destroyed by order of
the City Weed Inspector and the
cost for such destruction remains
unpaid.
UTILITY REPAIR COSTS
It is proposed to assess the cost
of utility repairs to those tracts or
parcels where, pursuant to City Or-
dinances, Section 04-201 through
04-305 service lines were repaired
and the cost for such repairs re-
main unpaid.
DELINQUENT ADMINISTRA-
TIVE VACANT BUILDING REGIS-
TRATIONS
It is proposed to assess the
cost of administratively registering
vacant buildings to those tracts
or parcels where, pursuant to City
Ordinance Section 12-1504 and in
accordance with MS 429, adminis-
trative vacant building registration
procedures were performed by or-
der of the City Inspectors and the
cost for such registration remains
unpaid.
PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
FOR OBJECTIONS TO SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS
An owner may appeal an as-
sessment to district court pursu-
ant to Minnesota Statutes, Sec-
tion 429.081 by serving notice
of the appeal upon the Mayor or
City Clerk within 30 days after the
adoption of the assessment and
filing such notice with the district
court within ten days after service
upon the Mayor or City Clerk. No
such appeal as to the amount of an
assessment for a specific parcel of
land may be made unless the own-
er has filed a written objection to
that objection to that assessment,
signed by the affected property
owner, with the City Clerk prior to
the hearing or has presented such
a written objection to the presiding
officer at the hearing.
These assessments are now on
file at City Hall and open to public
inspection. Written or oral objec-
tions to the proposed assessments
will be considered at this meeting,
but the City Council may consider
any objection to the amount of a
proposed individual assessment at
an adjourned meeting upon such
further notice to the affected prop-
erty owners as it deems advisable.
AUXILIARY AIDS AVAILABLE
UPON REQUEST
Auxiliary aids for persons with
disabilities are available upon re-
quest at least 96 hours (4 days)
in advance of the hearing. Please
contact the City Clerk at 763-569-
3300 to make arrangements.
/s/ Barbara Suciu
Barbara Suciu, City Clerk
By order of the City Council
Published in the
Sun Post
September 26, 2024
1422630
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DISEASED
TREE REMOVAL COSTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has caused the removal of trees on
certain properties within the City during 2024 under the authority of Minnesota Statutes, Section
18G.13, City Ordinance Section 20-301 through 20-306 and/or by written agreement with the
owners of such property; and
WHEREAS, on October 14, 2024, certain tree removal costs remained unpaid;
and
WHEREAS, an assessment roll for unpaid accounts during 2024, a copy of which
is attached hereto and made part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk,
tabulating those properties where tree removal costs are to be assessed, together with the
amounts proposed to be assessed to each property; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute authorizes the certification of delinquent
tree removal costs to the County tax rolls for collection; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council
has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for tree removal
costs.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The special assessment roll of tree removal costs incurred during the year
2024 is hereby adopted and certified as Levy No. 25049.
2. The special assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable in equal
annual installments with interest thereon at 3.5 percent per annum, extending
over a period of five years. The first of the installments shall be payable with
ad valorem taxes in 2025, and shall bear interest on the entire assessment from
December 1, 2024 through December 31, 2025. To each subsequent
installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid
installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor pay the whole of the
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
assessment, to the City, without interest, if the entire assessment is paid on or
before November 22, 2024. After November 22, 2024, he or she may pay the
total special assessment, plus interest. Interest will accumulate from
December 1, 2024 through the date of payment. Such payment must be made
by the close of business November 22, 2024 or interest will be charged
through December 31 of the succeeding year.
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplication of this
assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the
county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same
manner as other municipal taxes.
October 14, 2024 __________________________________
Date Mayor
ATTEST: ___________________________________________
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and moves its adoption:
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR WEEDS AND
TALL GRASS REMOVAL COSTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX
ROLLS
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has caused noxious weeds and tall grass
to be cut down on properties within the City under the authority of Minnesota Statutes Section
18.78 and City Ordinance Section 19-1601 through 19-1604; and
WHEREAS, on October 14, 2024, certain weed destruction accounts for removal
of said weeds and tall grass costs remained unpaid; and
WHEREAS, an assessment roll for unpaid accounts from 2024, a copy of which
is attached hereto and made part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk,
tabulating those properties where unpaid weed destruction account costs are to be assessed to
each property; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute authorizes the certification of delinquent
weed destruction accounts to the County tax rolls for collection; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council
has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for weed
destruction costs.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The special assessment roll of unpaid weed destruction accounts incurred
during the year 2024 is hereby adopted and certified as Levy No. 25047.
2. The special assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable with ad
valorem taxes in 2024, in one annual installment with interest thereon at 3.5
percent per annum and shall bear interest on the entire assessment from
December 1, 2024 through December 31, 2025.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor pay the whole of the
assessment, to the City Treasurer, without interest, if the entire assessment is
paid on or before November 22, 2024. After November 22, 2024, he or she
may pay the total special assessment, plus interest. Interest will accumulate
from December 1, 2024 through the date of payment. Such payment must be
made by the close of business November 22, 2024 or interest will be charged
through December 31 of the succeeding year.
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplication of this
assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the
county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same
manner as other municipal taxes.
October 14, 2024 ________________________________________
Date Mayor
ATTEST: ___________________________________________
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR NUISANCE
ABATEMENT COSTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has caused abatement removal on certain
properties within the City from September 16, 2023 thru September 17, 2024 under the authority
of City Ordinance Section 12-1504 and 19-105 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 429 and/or by
written agreement with the owners of such property; and
WHEREAS, on October 14, 2024, certain abatement accounts remained unpaid;
and
WHEREAS, an assessment roll for unpaid accounts from September 16, 2023 thru
September 17, 2024, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof by reference, has
been prepared by the City Clerk, tabulating those properties where abatement costs are to be
assessed, together with the amounts proposed to be assessed to each property; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute authorizes the certification of delinquent
abatement accounts to the County tax rolls for collection; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council
has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for abatement costs.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The special assessment roll of abatement costs incurred from September 16,
2023 thru September 17, 2024 is hereby adopted and certified as Levy No.
25048.
2. The special assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable with ad
valorem taxes in 2025, in one annual installment with interest thereon at 3.5
percent per annum and shall bear interest on the entire assessment from
December 1, 2024 through December 31, 2025.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the certification
of the assessment to the County Auditor pay the whole of the assessment, to the
City Treasurer, without interest, if the entire assessment is paid on or before
November 22, 2024. After November 22, 2024, he or she may pay the total
special assessment, plus interest. Interest will accumulate from December 1,
2024 through the date of payment. Such payment must be made by the close
of business November 23, 2024 or interest will be charged through December
31 of the succeeding year.
RESOLUTION NO. _____________
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplication of this assessment
to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county and
such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other
municipal taxes.
October 14, 2024 ______________________________
Date Mayor
ATTEST: ___________________________________________
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
FINES/CITATION COSTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has caused Administrative Fines/Citation
costs for certain properties within the City from September 16, 2024 thru September 17, 2024
under the authority of City Ordinance Section 18-204 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 429; and
WHEREAS, on October 14, 2024, certain Administrative Fines/Citation costs
remained unpaid; and
WHEREAS, an assessment roll for unpaid accounts from September 16, 2023 thru
September 17, 2024, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof by reference, has
been prepared by the City Clerk, tabulating those properties where Administrative Fines/Citation
costs are to be assessed to each property; and
WHEREAS, City Ordinance Section 18-210 and Minnesota State Statute
authorizes the certification of certain delinquent Administrative Fines/Citation accounts to the
County tax rolls for collection; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Coun cil
has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for Administrative
Fines/Citation costs.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The special assessment roll of Administrative Fines/Citation costs incurred
from September 16, 2023 thru September 17, 2024 is hereby adopted and
certified as Levy No. 25046.
2. The special assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable with ad
valorem taxes in 2025, in one annual installment with interest thereon at 3.5
percent per annum and shall bear interest on the entire assessment from
December 1, 2024 through December 31, 2025.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the certification
of the assessment to the County Auditor pay the whole of the assessment, to the
City Treasurer, without interest, if the entire assessment is paid on or before
November 22, 2024. After November 22, 2024, he or she may pay the total
special assessment, plus interest. Interest will accumulate from December1,
2024 through the date of payment. Such payment must be made by the close
of business November 22, 2024 or interest will be charged through December
31 of the succeeding year.
RESOLUTION NO. _____________
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplication of this assessment
to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county and
such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other
municipal taxes.
October 14, 2024 ________________________________
Date Mayor
ATTEST: ___________________________________________
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
ADMINISTRATIVELY REGISTERED VACANT PROPERTIES COSTS TO
THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has caused administratively registered
vacant properties on certain properties within the City from September 16, 2023 thru September
17, 2024 under the authority of City Ordinance Section 12-1504 and Minnesota Statutes, Section
429 and/or by written agreement with the owners of such property; and
WHEREAS, on October 14, 2024, certain administratively registered vacant
property accounts remained unpaid; and
WHEREAS, an assessment roll for unpaid accounts from September 16, 2023 thru
September 17, 2024, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof by reference, has
been prepared by the City Clerk, tabulating those properties where registered vacant property costs
are to be assessed, together with the amounts proposed to be assessed to each property; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute authorizes the certification of vacant property
registration accounts to the County tax rolls for collection; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council
has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for abatement costs.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The special assessment roll of administratively vacant building costs incurred
from September 16, 2023 thru September 17, 2024 is hereby adopted and
certified as Levy No. 25050.
2. The special assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable with ad
valorem taxes in 2025, in one annual installment with interest thereon at 3.5
percent per annum and shall bear interest on the entire assessment from
December 1, 2024 through December 31, 2025.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the certification
of the assessment to the County Auditor pay the whole of the assessment, to the
City Treasurer, without interest, if the entire assessment is paid on or before
November 22, 2024. After November 22, 2024, he or she may pay the total
special assessment, plus interest. Interest will accumulate from December 1,
2024 through the date of payment. Such payment must be made by the close
of business November 23, 2024 or interest will be charged through December
31 of the succeeding year.
RESOLUTION NO. _____________
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplication of this assessment
to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county and
such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other
municipal taxes.
October 14, 2024 ______________________________
Date Mayor
ATTEST: ___________________________________________
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Amended Special Assessment Certified Roll (Administrative Vacant Building Registration )
September 13, 2023 to September 17, 2024 Administrative Vacant Building Registration
Printed October 09, 2024
Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year
Levy No.Property ID
Pending
AmountProperty Address
Capital
Interest
Charge
Special
Assessment
Charge
Total
Amount
Certified
25050 10-118-21-12-0027 400.00 5250 Ewing Ave N 10.00 30.00 440.00
Total:440.00
Page 1 of 1City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430
Amended Special Assessment Certified Roll (Trees)
2024 Tree Removal
Printed October 09, 2024
Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs Five Years
Levy No.Property ID
Pending
AmountProperty Address
Capital
Interest
Charge
Special
Assessment
Charge
Total
Amount
Certified
25049 01-118-21-33-0093 750.00 5447 Emerson Ave N 30.00 30.00 810.00
25049 02-118-21-42-0049 900.00 2205 Brookview Dr 30.00 30.00 960.00
25049 03-118-21-43-0057 7,850.00 3600 53rd Ave N 30.00 30.00 7,910.00
25049 33-119-21-11-0087 7,321.17 6700 Quail Ave N 30.00 30.00 7,381.17
25049 34-119-21-21-0019 3,050.00 6728 Grimes Ave N 30.00 30.00 3,110.00
25049 34-119-21-41-0002 2,825.00 3006 63rd Ave N 30.00 30.00 2,885.00
25049 35-119-21-13-0012 23,464.27 2200 Freeway Blvd 30.00 30.00 23,524.27
Total:46,580.44
Page 1 of 1City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430
Amended Special Assessment Certified Roll (Abatement)
September 13, 2023 to September 17, 2024 Abatement
Printed October 09, 2024
Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year
Levy No.Property ID
Pending
AmountProperty Address
Capital
Interest
Charge
Special
Assessment
Charge
Total
Amount
Certified
25048 01-118-21-31-0090 1,375.00 5607 Aldrich Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,415.00
25048 01-118-21-33-0055 675.00 5421 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 715.00
25048 01-118-21-33-0093 1,859.50 5447 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,899.50
25048 02-118-21-12-0013 61,680.27 5951 Earle Brown Dr 10.00 30.00 61,720.27
25048 03-118-21-12-0098 5,750.00 6037 Brooklyn Blvd 10.00 30.00 5,790.00
25048 35-119-21-41-0008 2,477.28 6440 James Cir N 10.00 30.00 2,517.28
Total:74,057.05
Page 1 of 1City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430
Amended Special Assessment Certified Roll (Admin Fines/Citations)
September 13, 2023 to September 17, 2024 Administrative Penalty/Citation
Printed October 09, 2024
Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year
Levy No.Property ID
Pending
AmountProperty Address
Capital
Interest
Charge
Special
Assessment
Charge
Total
Amount
Certified
25046 01-118-21-12-0031 1,500.00 6023 Lyndale Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,540.00
25046 01-118-21-21-0022 3,500.00 5919 Colfax Ave N 10.00 30.00 3,540.00
25046 01-118-21-21-0066 600.00 6019 Camden Ave N 10.00 30.00 640.00
25046 01-118-21-21-0102 100.00 5946 Colfax Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 01-118-21-22-0017 1,700.00 5951 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,740.00
25046 01-118-21-22-0083 2,800.00 6007 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 2,840.00
25046 01-118-21-22-0093 185.00 5914 Fremont Ave N 10.00 30.00 225.00
25046 01-118-21-23-0009 50.00 5700 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 90.00
25046 01-118-21-23-0100 2,300.00 5818 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 2,340.00
25046 01-118-21-24-0018 600.00 5849 Colfax Ave N 10.00 30.00 640.00
25046 01-118-21-24-0105 200.00 5711 Camden Ave N 10.00 30.00 240.00
25046 01-118-21-31-0011 60.00 5637 Bryant Ave N 10.00 30.00 100.00
25046 01-118-21-31-0035 300.00 5603 Bryant Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 01-118-21-31-0082 2,600.00 5544 Dupont Ave N 10.00 30.00 2,640.00
25046 01-118-21-31-0090 700.00 5607 Aldrich Ave N 10.00 30.00 740.00
25046 01-118-21-31-0150 100.00 806 55th Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 01-118-21-32-0010 900.00 5556 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 940.00
25046 01-118-21-32-0078 4,675.00 5637 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 4,715.00
25046 01-118-21-33-0011 300.00 5336 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 01-118-21-33-0023 100.00 5337 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 01-118-21-33-0055 100.00 5421 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 01-118-21-33-0069 500.00 5444 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 540.00
25046 01-118-21-33-0072 125.00 1425 55th Ave N 10.00 30.00 165.00
25046 01-118-21-33-0095 300.00 5431 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 01-118-21-33-0120 5,025.00 5309 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 5,065.00
25046 01-118-21-33-0139 300.00 5333 Dupont Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 01-118-21-33-0146 300.00 5301 Dupont Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 01-118-21-34-0044 50.00 5432 Bryant Ave N 10.00 30.00 90.00
25046 01-118-21-34-0104 835.00 5357 Colfax Ave N 10.00 30.00 875.00
25046 01-118-21-34-0130 3,875.00 5327 Bryant Ave N 10.00 30.00 3,915.00
25046 01-118-21-34-0131 200.00 5403 Bryant Ave N 10.00 30.00 240.00
25046 01-118-21-43-0047 50.00 5444 Camden Ave N 10.00 30.00 90.00
25046 02-118-21-12-0010 1,200.00 5930 Earle Brown Dr 10.00 30.00 1,240.00
25046 02-118-21-14-0006 250.00 5712 Logan Ave N 10.00 30.00 290.00
25046 02-118-21-14-0061 250.00 5724 James Ave N 10.00 30.00 290.00
25046 02-118-21-14-0071 1,200.00 5713 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,240.00
25046 02-118-21-22-0038 1,475.00 5931 Vincent Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,515.00
25046 02-118-21-31-0027 300.00 2312 Brookview Dr 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 02-118-21-32-0018 700.00 1200 Shingle Creek Crossing 10.00 30.00 740.00
25046 02-118-21-34-0043 4,900.00 5307 Penn Ave N 10.00 30.00 4,940.00
25046 02-118-21-41-0059 700.00 5603 James Ave N 10.00 30.00 740.00
25046 02-118-21-42-0103 1,900.00 2118 Ericon Dr 10.00 30.00 1,940.00
25046 02-118-21-42-0120 8,500.00 5601 Logan Ave N 10.00 30.00 8,540.00
25046 02-118-21-43-0077 300.00 2006 55th Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
Page 1 of 3City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430
Amended Special Assessment Certified Roll (Admin Fines/Citations)
September 13, 2023 to September 17, 2024 Administrative Penalty/Citation
Printed October 09, 2024
Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year
Levy No.Property ID
Pending
AmountProperty Address
Capital
Interest
Charge
Special
Assessment
Charge
Total
Amount
Certified
25046 02-118-21-43-0128 300.00 5400 Penn Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 02-118-21-44-0018 700.00 5433 Knox Ave N 10.00 30.00 740.00
25046 02-118-21-44-0128 700.00 5431 James Ave N 10.00 30.00 740.00
25046 03-118-21-12-0017 250.00 6019 Brooklyn Blvd 10.00 30.00 290.00
25046 03-118-21-22-0022 100.00 5925 June Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 03-118-21-23-0027 6,600.00 5805 Shores Dr 10.00 30.00 6,640.00
25046 03-118-21-23-0030 200.00 5811 Shores Dr 10.00 30.00 240.00
25046 03-118-21-24-0059 350.00 3715 58th Ave N 10.00 30.00 390.00
25046 03-118-21-24-0071 300.00 5833 Pearson Dr 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 03-118-21-44-0033 125.00 5501 Xerxes Ave N 10.00 30.00 165.00
25046 10-118-21-12-0042 300.00 5130 Ewing Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 10-118-21-12-0077 300.00 5049 Ewing Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 10-118-21-13-0013 500.00 3321 50th Ave N 10.00 30.00 540.00
25046 10-118-21-13-0032 10,150.00 3416 50th Ave N 10.00 30.00 10,190.00
25046 10-118-21-13-0040 700.00 5019 Ewing Ave N 10.00 30.00 740.00
25046 10-118-21-13-0051 2,800.00 3616 50th Ave N 10.00 30.00 2,840.00
25046 10-118-21-13-0059 3,700.00 3607 50th Ave N 10.00 30.00 3,740.00
25046 10-118-21-32-0071 6,600.00 4110 Lakebreeze Ave 10.00 30.00 6,640.00
25046 10-118-21-32-0102 4,100.00 4207 Lakeside Ave 00131 10.00 30.00 4,140.00
25046 10-118-21-32-0146 125.00 4207 Lakeside Ave 00234 10.00 30.00 165.00
25046 10-118-21-42-0028 1,000.00 3601 47th Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,040.00
25046 10-118-21-42-0029 1,300.00 3513 47th Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,340.00
25046 10-118-21-42-0030 1,300.00 3501 47th Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,340.00
25046 25-119-21-32-0045 125.00 7113 Fremont Ave N 10.00 30.00 165.00
25046 25-119-21-42-0060 6,000.00 7112 Dallas Rd 10.00 30.00 6,040.00
25046 26-119-21-42-0041 900.00 7113 Morgan Ave N 10.00 30.00 940.00
25046 26-119-21-43-0014 950.00 6925 Morgan Ave N 10.00 30.00 990.00
25046 26-119-21-44-0056 150.00 7018 Irving Ave N 10.00 30.00 190.00
25046 26-119-21-44-0068 100.00 1510 69th Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 27-119-21-32-0045 300.00 7213 Major Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 27-119-21-32-0123 375.00 4401 71st Ave N 10.00 30.00 415.00
25046 27-119-21-32-0124 100.00 4407 71st Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 27-119-21-33-0044 100.00 4600 69th Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 27-119-21-33-0103 300.00 6930 Brooklyn Blvd 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 27-119-21-42-0055 60.00 3701 Woodbine La 10.00 30.00 100.00
25046 27-119-21-42-0063 100.00 3806 72nd Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 27-119-21-43-0096 3,925.00 3606 Urban Ave 10.00 30.00 3,965.00
25046 28-119-21-42-0039 700.00 7184 Unity Ave N 10.00 30.00 740.00
25046 28-119-21-42-0055 300.00 5341 72nd Cir 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 28-119-21-44-0002 2,000.00 4702 69th Ave N 10.00 30.00 2,040.00
25046 33-119-21-11-0011 375.00 6824 Orchard Ave N 10.00 30.00 415.00
25046 33-119-21-11-0084 5,000.00 6718 Quail Ave N 10.00 30.00 5,040.00
25046 33-119-21-11-0087 1,900.00 6700 Quail Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,940.00
25046 33-119-21-41-0060 100.00 6330 Perry Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00
Page 2 of 3City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430
Amended Special Assessment Certified Roll (Admin Fines/Citations)
September 13, 2023 to September 17, 2024 Administrative Penalty/Citation
Printed October 09, 2024
Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year
Levy No.Property ID
Pending
AmountProperty Address
Capital
Interest
Charge
Special
Assessment
Charge
Total
Amount
Certified
25046 33-119-21-41-0103 100.00 5001 65th Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 33-119-21-42-0024 900.00 6324 Scott Ave N 10.00 30.00 940.00
25046 33-119-21-42-0092 4,650.00 6431 Unity Ave N 10.00 30.00 4,690.00
25046 33-119-21-43-0041 4,000.00 6113 Scott Ave N 10.00 30.00 4,040.00
25046 33-119-21-44-0021 5,875.00 6106 Quail Ave N 10.00 30.00 5,915.00
25046 34-119-21-11-0089 4,000.00 3112 Thurber Rd 10.00 30.00 4,040.00
25046 34-119-21-12-0060 300.00 3801 69th Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 34-119-21-12-0067 300.00 6801 Ewing Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 34-119-21-12-0068 100.00 6800 France Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 34-119-21-12-0077 500.00 6742 France Ave N 10.00 30.00 540.00
25046 34-119-21-13-0027 300.00 3701 66th Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 34-119-21-14-0081 600.00 3016 Quarles Rd 10.00 30.00 640.00
25046 34-119-21-14-0084 500.00 3025 Quarles Rd 10.00 30.00 540.00
25046 34-119-21-21-0018 600.00 6720 Grimes Ave N 10.00 30.00 640.00
25046 34-119-21-21-0020 5,500.00 6727 Grimes Ave N 10.00 30.00 5,540.00
25046 34-119-21-21-0022 300.00 6715 Grimes Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 34-119-21-21-0023 600.00 6707 Grimes Ave N 10.00 30.00 640.00
25046 34-119-21-31-0046 300.00 6307 Indiana Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 34-119-21-33-0036 600.00 6230 Lee Ave N 10.00 30.00 640.00
25046 34-119-21-41-0011 125.00 3212 63rd Ave N 10.00 30.00 165.00
25046 34-119-21-41-0053 100.00 3306 Poe Rd 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 34-119-21-41-0097 350.00 3006 65th Ave N 10.00 30.00 390.00
25046 34-119-21-44-0013 200.00 3301 63rd Ave N 10.00 30.00 240.00
25046 35-119-21-11-0018 1,800.00 6749 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,840.00
25046 35-119-21-11-0021 100.00 6769 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 35-119-21-13-0006 100.00 2101 Freeway Blvd 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 35-119-21-24-0007 1,400.00 2590 Freeway Blvd 10.00 30.00 1,440.00
25046 35-119-21-31-0009 1,200.00 6501 Brooklyn Dr 10.00 30.00 1,240.00
25046 35-119-21-32-0001 100.00 6312 Brooklyn Dr 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 35-119-21-32-0036 110.00 6400 Xerxes Ave N 10.00 30.00 150.00
25046 35-119-21-34-0004 50.00 6221 Shingle Creek Pkwy 10.00 30.00 90.00
25046 36-119-21-13-0002 600.00 6648 West River Rd 10.00 30.00 640.00
25046 36-119-21-22-0047 450.00 6800 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 490.00
25046 36-119-21-22-0058 300.00 1312 68th Ln N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25046 36-119-21-24-0047 400.00 700 66th Ave N 10.00 30.00 440.00
25046 36-119-21-32-0036 1,200.00 6430 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,240.00
25046 36-119-21-34-0012 100.00 6114 Bryant Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00
25046 36-119-21-34-0101 2,675.00 6135 Camden Ave N 10.00 30.00 2,715.00
Total:169,390.00
Page 3 of 3City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430
Amended Special Assessment Certified Roll (Grass/Weeds)
September 16, 2023 to September 17, 2024 Weed Destruction
Printed October 10, 2024
Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year
Levy No.Property ID
Pending
AmountProperty Address
Capital
Interest
Charge
Special
Assessment
Charge
Total
Amount
Certified
25047 01-118-21-12-0036 266.25 6006 Camden Ave N 10.00 30.00 306.25
25047 01-118-21-13-0040 477.50 5834 Camden Ave N 10.00 30.00 517.50
25047 01-118-21-23-0085 390.00 5748 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 430.00
25047 01-118-21-24-0106 266.25 5705 Camden Ave N 10.00 30.00 306.25
25047 01-118-21-31-0035 300.00 5603 Bryant Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25047 01-118-21-31-0091 165.00 5601 Aldrich Ave N 10.00 30.00 205.00
25047 01-118-21-33-0055 341.25 5421 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 381.25
25047 02-118-21-12-0013 3,180.00 5951 Earle Brown Dr 10.00 30.00 3,220.00
25047 02-118-21-22-0004 1,810.00 6030 Vincent Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,850.00
25047 02-118-21-31-0027 255.00 2312 Brookview Dr 10.00 30.00 295.00
25047 02-118-21-34-0015 315.00 5419 Queen Ave N 10.00 30.00 355.00
25047 02-118-21-34-0045 210.00 5300 Queen Ave N 10.00 30.00 250.00
25047 02-118-21-41-0060 165.00 5602 Knox Ave N 10.00 30.00 205.00
25047 02-118-21-42-0080 165.00 5537 Judy La 10.00 30.00 205.00
25047 02-118-21-42-0120 705.00 5601 Logan Ave N 10.00 30.00 745.00
25047 03-118-21-11-0018 705.00 6025 Abbott Ave N 10.00 30.00 745.00
25047 03-118-21-12-0015 465.00 6031 Brooklyn Blvd 10.00 30.00 505.00
25047 03-118-21-12-0016 465.00 6025 Brooklyn Blvd 10.00 30.00 505.00
25047 03-118-21-12-0087 210.00 6045 Brooklyn Blvd 10.00 30.00 250.00
25047 03-118-21-12-0098 210.00 6037 Brooklyn Blvd 10.00 30.00 250.00
25047 03-118-21-24-0064 210.00 5808 Pearson Dr 10.00 30.00 250.00
25047 10-118-21-12-0027 210.00 5250 Ewing Ave N 10.00 30.00 250.00
25047 10-118-21-21-0035 165.00 5261 Twin Lake Blvd E 10.00 30.00 205.00
25047 10-118-21-21-0049 255.00 5133 France Ave N 10.00 30.00 295.00
25047 25-119-21-42-0060 757.50 7112 Dallas Rd 10.00 30.00 797.50
25047 26-119-21-44-0020 165.00 7019 Knox Ave N 10.00 30.00 205.00
25047 27-119-21-31-0076 165.00 7113 Halifax Ave N 10.00 30.00 205.00
25047 27-119-21-33-0011 165.00 6939 Brooklyn Blvd 10.00 30.00 205.00
25047 27-119-21-33-0012 165.00 6933 Brooklyn Blvd 10.00 30.00 205.00
25047 27-119-21-33-0013 165.00 6927 Brooklyn Blvd 10.00 30.00 205.00
25047 27-119-21-33-0014 165.00 6921 Brooklyn Blvd 10.00 30.00 205.00
25047 28-119-21-44-0005 165.00 6931 Perry Ave N 10.00 30.00 205.00
25047 33-119-21-11-0065 165.00 6800 Quail Ave N 10.00 30.00 205.00
25047 33-119-21-12-0072 300.00 6801 Scott Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00
25047 33-119-21-42-0092 210.00 6431 Unity Ave N 10.00 30.00 250.00
25047 34-119-21-14-0058 266.25 3113 66th Ave N 10.00 30.00 306.25
25047 34-119-21-23-0080 187.50 4512 65th Ave N 10.00 30.00 227.50
25047 34-119-21-42-0009 495.00 6306 France Ave N 10.00 30.00 535.00
25047 34-119-21-43-0027 970.00 6206 Chowen Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,010.00
25047 35-119-21-33-0012 210.00 6264 Brooklyn Dr 10.00 30.00 250.00
25047 36-119-21-14-0002 442.50 6518 Willow La N 10.00 30.00 482.50
25047 36-119-21-21-0014 210.00 6839 Colfax Ave N 10.00 30.00 250.00
25047 36-119-21-21-0040 210.00 6718 Colfax Ave N 10.00 30.00 250.00
25047 36-119-21-33-0018 176.25 1118 62nd Ave N 10.00 30.00 216.25
Page 1 of 2City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430
Amended Special Assessment Certified Roll (Grass/Weeds)
September 16, 2023 to September 17, 2024 Weed Destruction
Printed October 10, 2024
Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year
Levy No.Property ID
Pending
AmountProperty Address
Capital
Interest
Charge
Special
Assessment
Charge
Total
Amount
Certified
Total:19,421.25
Page 2 of 2City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430
C ouncil R egular M eeng
DAT E:10/14/2024
TO :C ity C ouncil
F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager
T H R O U G H :N/A
BY:A ngela H olm, F inance D irector
S U B J E C T:Res olu+on C er+fying S pecial A sses s ments for D elinquent 2024 P ublic U +lity S ervice
A ccounts and Resolu+on Cer+fying S pecial A s s essments for Emergency P rivate U +lity
S ervice Repairs to the H ennepin County P roperty Tax Rolls
Requested Council A con:
- Moon to:
Open the public hearing;
Take public input; and
C lose the public hearing.
- Moon to approve a resoluon cerfy ing special assessments for delinquent public ulity service
accounts to the H ennepin C ounty property tax rolls.
- Moon to approve a resoluon cerfy ing special assessments for emergency private ulity service repairs
to the H ennepin C ounty property tax rolls.
B ackground:
The C ity of Brooklyn C enter cer+fies delinquent u+lity bills to H ennepin County annually. The cer+fied
bills become as s essments on the property ow ner ’s property tax bill for the follow ing year.
This proces s s tarts w ith a le7er to the customer no+fying them that their account is pas t due and that
the amount will be cer+fied against their property taxes. This le7er details the proces s and the legal
authority for cer+fica+on. Recipients of this le7er are advis ed they may dis pute the charges at a public
hearing. The date, +me and loca+on for the public hearing was publis hed in the official newspaper of the
City. Customers that have not paid by the cut-off date in the le7er (November 22, 2024) are included in the
final as s essment roll s ubmi7ed to the C ounty.
The C ity has approximately 8,900 public u+lity service accounts .
Compara+ve number of accounts and dollars cer+fied are as follows:
2018 677 $496,644.11
2019 661 $487,227.89
2020 489 $377,574.76
2021 663 $513,875.17
2022 968 $877,967.32
2023 622 $582,021.22
2024 886 $905,656.82
There is currently one res ident who has s ubmi7ed a le7er reques+ng review of the current as s essment.
The C ity als o has proper+es on its s outhern border with M inneapolis that are s erviced by M inneapolis
w ater services. City s taff have been no+fied that tw o of these proper+es have delinquent w ater charges
from 2023 that need to be cer+fied to H ennepin C ounty, as w ell as charges from 2024. Thes e charges will
be included in the cer+fica+on roll for taxes payable in 2025.
The C ity has a policy that provides assistance to residents w ho are facing the unexpected financial burden of
a needed exterior private u+lity repair. Thes e repairs oDen involve the s ewer line from a residen+al
property to the main street line. This por+on of the sew er s ystem is the res pons ibility of the property
ow ner. For taxes payable in 2025, there are three as s essments that w ill be included on the final roll sent to
H ennepin C ounty. A lis+ng of thes e items is included w ith this agenda item.
B udget I ssues:
These delinquent u+lity billings are recorded as receiv ables and r ecogniz ed as revenues in the current
budget year. H ow ever, the actual collec+ons of these accounts will likely occur in future years .
I nclusive C ommunity Engagement:
A nracist/Equity Policy Effect:
S trategic Priories and Values:
Maintain a s trong financial pos i+on, P rovide quality s ervices w ith fair and equitable treatment
AT TA C H M E N TS :
D escrip+on U pload D ate Type
U +lity A s s essment M emo 10/11/2024 Cover Memo
D elinquent U+lity A sses s ment Resolu+on 10/11/2024 Resolu+on Le7er
Emergency Repair Resolu+on 10/11/2024 Resolu+on Le7er
Emergency Repair S pecial A s s essments 10/11/2024 Backup M aterial
U +lites A s s essment P res enta+on 10/11/2024 P resenta+on
COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 14, 2024
TO: Reggie Edwards, City Manager
FROM: Angela Holm, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Delinquent Public Utility Service
Accounts and Emergency Private Utility Service Repairs to the Hennepin County Property Tax
Rolls
Recommendation:
Motion to approve a resolution certifying special assessments for delinquent public utility service
accounts to the Hennepin County property tax rolls.
Motion to approve a resolution certifying special assessments for emergency private utility service
repairs to the Hennepin County property tax rolls.
Background:
The City of Brooklyn Center certifies delinquent utility bills to Hennepin County annually. The
certified bills become assessments on the property owner’s property tax bill for the following
year.
This process starts with a letter to the customer notifying them that their account is past due and
that the amount will be certified against their property taxes. This letter details the process and
the legal authority for certification. Recipients of this letter are advised they may dispute the
charges at a public hearing. The date, time and location for the public hearing was published in
the official newspaper of the City. Customers that have not paid by the cut-off date in the letter
(November 22, 2024) are included in the final assessment roll submitted to the County.
The City has approximately 8,900 public utility service accounts.
Comparative number of accounts and dollars certified are as follows:
2019 661 $487,227.89
2020 489 $377,574.76
2021 663 $513,875.17
2022 968 $877,967.32
2023 622 $582,021.22
2024 886 $905,656.82
There is currently one resident who has submitted a letter requesting review of the current
assessment.
COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
The City also has properties on its southern border with Minneapolis that are serviced by
Minneapolis water services. City staff have been notified that two of these properties have
delinquent water charges from 2023 that need to be certified to Hennepin County, as well as
charges from 2024. These charges will be included in the certification roll for taxes payable in
2025.
The City has a policy that provides assistance to residents who are facing the unexpected
financial burden of a needed exterior private utility repair. These repairs often involve the sewer
line from a residential property to the main street line. This portion of the sewer system is the
responsibility of the property owner. For taxes payable in 2025, there are three assessments that
will be included on the final roll sent to Hennepin County. A listing of these items is included
with this agenda item.
Budget Issues:
The assessed values are recorded as receivables and recognized as revenues in the current budget
year. However, the actual collections of these accounts will likely occur in future years.
Strategic Priorities:
• Maintain a strong financial position
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DELINQUENT
PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICE ACCOUNTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY
PROPERTY TAX ROLLS
WHEREAS, the records of the Utility Billing Division list certain accounts as
delinquent as of July 31, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the owners of the properties served by each delinquent account have
been notified of the delinquency according to legal requirements; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 444.075 and City Ordinances, Sections 4-105 and
4-201 authorize certification of such delinquent accounts to the County property tax rolls for
collection; and
WHEREAS, a special assessment roll, a copy of which is attached hereto and made
part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk, tabulating those properties where a
delinquent public utility account is to be assessed with the amount and service charges to be
assessed; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council
has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessments for delinquent utility
service accounts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The special assessment roll of delinquent public utility accounts is hereby adopted
and certified as Assessment Roll No. 25051.
2. The special assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable with ad valorem
taxes levied in 2025, in one installment with interest thereon at three and one-half
percent (3.5%) per annum, and shall bear interest on the entire assessment from
December 1, 2024 through December 31, 2025.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the certification of
the assessments to the Hennepin County Auditor pay the entire assessment to the
City, without interest, if the entire assessment is paid on or before November 22nd
2024.
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to
the Hennepin County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County,
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other
municipal taxes.
October 14, 2024
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR EMERGENCY
PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICE REPAIRS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY
PROPERTY TAX ROLLS
WHEREAS, pursuant to the City’s Emergency Private Utility Service Repair
Assessment Policy provides assistance to Brooklyn Center residents who are facing the unexpected
financial burden of a needed exterior private utility repair; and
WHEREAS, the City has provided funds to the homeowner to complete a private
exterior repair; and
WHEREAS, the homeowner has agreed, as part of the assessment agreement, to
the assessment and to waive any and all procedural and substantive objections to the
improvement and assessment, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim
that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the property; and
WHEREAS, a special assessment roll, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk, tabulating those properties
where a private utility repair cost is to be assessed with the amount, including interest and
service charges if applicable, to be assessed,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that:
1. The special assessment roll of emergency private utility repairs is hereby adopted
and certified as Assessment Roll No. 25168.
2. The special assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable with ad valorem taxes
levied in 2025, in five installments with interest thereon at three (3.5) percent per annum.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the certification of the
assessments to the Hennepin County Auditor pay the entire assessment to the City,
without interest. Such payments must be made by the close of business on November 22,
2024 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year.
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
Hennepin County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such
assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
a
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
October 14, 2024
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Report Name: SA_Master Printed: 10/7/2024
Page: 1Special Assessment Master Report
S/A Number: 25051
City of Brooklyn Center
Payment Number: 0 Of: 5
S/A Number: 25051
Assessment Total: $0.00
Interest Rate: 3.5000
1st Yr. Int. Months: 13 1st Yr. Payable: 2024
Description: 2023 Utility Repair
Opened Date: 11/20/2023
1st Hearing:
2nd Hearing:
Levied:
Amortization Type: HC
County Admin Fee: $0.00
Status: Pending
Project Nbr: Fund: Contract Nbr: Fin Acct Nbr: 49141-4705
Resolution Number:
Grace Period End Date:
Category: Calc Daily Interest: No
Continue Calculating Deferred: No
Int Acct Nbr: 49141-4705
Sub Status:
Street Name Closed DescTotal Assessment Payoff AmtProperty ID House UnitSt Orig Assessment
$5,000.00 01-118-21-32-0030 1300 55th Ave N $5,000.00 A $5,000.00
$5,544.00 33-119-21-13-0092 5301 Howe La $5,544.00 A $5,544.00
$7,244.00 36-119-21-34-0070 6200 Dupont Ave N $7,244.00 A $7,244.00
A Total: $17,788.00 3A Count: $17,788.00 $17,788.00
Grand Total:$17,788.00 3Total Count:$17,788.00 $17,788.00
Special Assessment Public Hearing
Delinquent UtilitiesEmergency Private Utility Service Repairs
City Council Meeting, October 14, 2024
Angela Holm, Finance Director
Special Assessment Background
•October 8, 2018
•Minnesota State law allows cities to recover costs of certain
types of services through special assessments to the property
•The City incurs costs of providing public utilities, typically
recovered through user charges. If these user charges remain
unpaid, the costs may be assessed to the property.
•Public hearing required.
2
Delinquent Utility Process
•October 8, 2018
•Customer receives a regular utility bill (water/sanitary sewer/storm drainage/street light/recycling).
•Balances of $400 or more that are past due as of July 31, 2024
•Letter is sent to the customer notifying them the account is past due and amount will be certified against property taxes if not paid. Customers given the opportunity to pay outstanding bill prior to certification.
•As of October 11, 2024, one formal appeal has been made to staff.
3
Payment Options
Once an assessment roll is adopted by the Council, the owner of each
property has the following options:
•Pay the entire amount of the special assessment, without interest by
November 22, 2024
•Pay with taxes in 2025 with interest accrued from December 1,
2024. The total principal and total interest is due in 2025.
4
Summary
•Unpaid Charges -$905,656.82
•2023 -$582,021.22
•2022 -$877,967.32
•Unpaid Accounts –886
•2023 –622
•2022 –968
•72% of certifications are under $1,000 (86% in 2023)
•Current amount as of October 11, 2024
5
Next Steps
•Public Hearing for Delinquent Public Utility accounts at this evening’s
meeting
•Customers may provide a basis for their appeal during the public
hearing
•If needed, City Council may direct staff to investigate further and
public hearing will be continued for those properties.
•Staff will review cases and provide a report at the upcoming City
Council meeting for review by City Council
6
Emergency Private Utility Service
Repairs•October 8, 2018
•Emergency repairs are performed to ensure sewer service is
maintained at property
•Resident signs agreement to have cost of repairs assessed to their
property tax for the next year
•This cannot be challenged at the public hearing
•As of October 11, 2024, there are three assessments to be
included on the roll
7
Guidelines for Appellants
People wishing to appeal should:
•Approach the center podium and address the Council
•State their full name and their current address
•Provide the address of the property with the pending
special assessment (if different)
•State the reason they think they should not have to pay
the pending assessment costs
•Appellants should provide contact information to staff
8
Recommended Action
-Motion to adopt resolution certifying special assessments for
delinquent public utility service accounts to the Hennepin County
property tax rolls.
-Motion to adopt resolution certifying emergency private utility
service repairs to the Hennepin County property tax rolls.
9
C ouncil R egular M eeng
DAT E:10/14/2024
TO :C ity C ouncil
F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager
T H R O U G H :J esse A nders on, C ommunity D evelopment D irector
BY:G inny M cI ntosh, P lanning M anager
S U B J E C T:A n O rdinance A mending S ec/on 35-4103 (A llowed Use Table) of the C ity C ode of
O rdinances Regarding P laces for Religious A ssembly in the Bus iness M ixed-U s e (M X-B)
D is trict - 2nd Reading
Requested Council A con:
- M oon to deny the zoning text amendment pr oposed by A pplicant Tr inity I nter naonal Fellow ship
regarding S econ 35-4103 (A llow ed U se Table) of the C ity C ode of Or dinances, and as outlined under
P lanning C ommission A pplicaon No. 2024-011, that w ould allow for P laces for Religious A ssembly as a
condional use within the Business M ixed-U se (M X-B) D istrict.
The P lanning Commission r ecommended approv al of the reques ted amendment on a 3-2 v ote at their
S eptember 12, 2024 mee/ng. At the S eptember 23, 2024 City Council mee/ng, a request was made to table
the firs t reading of the propos ed ordinance amendment and a reques t for addi/onal informa/on w as made.
City s taff maintains the pos i/on that, bas ed on the findings pr es ented w ithin the prov ided s taff report, the
requested or dinance amendment should be denied; how ev er, if C ity Council elects to
recommend appr oval of the request to amend S ec/on 35-4103 (A llow ed U s e Table) to allow for P laces for
Religious A s s embly as a condi/onal us e in the Bus ines s M ixed-U s e (M X-B) D is trict, the mo/on language
s hould be to approve the s econd reading and adopt the ordinance amendment.
B ackground:
R aonale for C ity S taff Recommendaon
At the S eptember 2 3 , 2024 City C ouncil mee/ng, C ity s taff pres ented a fir s t r eading of a request to amend
the City ’s Unified D evelopment O r dinance (U D O ) to allow for “P laces for Religious A ssembly ” in the City ’s
Busines s M ixed-U s e (M X-B) D is trict as a condi/onal use. T he applica/on request was s ubmi@ed by
A pplicant Trinity I nterna/onal Fellow s hip w ho has an interest in purchasing an M X-B zoned property.
Following a pres enta/on by C ity s taff, and ques /ons pos ed by the City Council to C ity staff and the
A pplicant, a request to table considera/on of the firs t reading of the applica/on r eques t to the O ctober 14,
2024 mee/ng was made. A s part of that r eques t, City Council had reques ted addi/onal informa/on on
“S acred S e@lements ” and clarifica/on as to C ity s taff ’s recommenda/on of denial for the applica/on
request.
The reques t for addi/onal infor ma/on on S acr ed S e@lements s tems from conv ers a/ons follow ing the
S eptember 12, 2 0 2 4 P lanning C ommis s ion mee/ng, in which the C ity A@orney infor med C ity s taff that a bill
w as pas s ed during this las t legisla/ve s es s ion and went into effect on J anuary 1, 2 0 2 4 regarding “S acred
S e@lements .” T his informa/on was not provided to the P lanning C ommis s ion during their review of the
requested ordinance amendment, but w ould allow religious ins /tu/ons to s ite micro-unit dwellings on
proper/es ow ned by religious ins /tu/ons . City staff is currently uns ure as to w hether these micro-unit
dw ellings would be of cons idera/on or feas ible on any of the proper/es within the Bus iness M ixed-U s e
(M X-B) D istrict given how new this legis la/on is ; however, addi/onal informa/on has been provided.
City staff re comme nde d denial of P lanning C ommis s ion A pplicaon N o. 2 0 2 4 -0 1 1 . This determinaon
was made based on the following:
1. A pplicant res pons es to the ordinance amendment, w hich w ere ans w ered specific to the one property
of interes t (6010 Earle Brown D rive) as oppos ed to addressing the poten/al impacts of allowing for “P laces
for Religious A s s embly ” in the greater Bus iness Mixed-Use (M X-B ) D is trict, which w ould affect 36
proper/es;
2. Non-conformity with the City of Brooklyn Center ’s 2040 C omprehens ive P lan, including the purpos e of
the Busines s M ixed-U s e (B-M U) land use des igna/on, which s ubs tan/ally aligns with the C ity ’s Bus iness
Mixed-Use (M X-B) z oning dis trict, and the implementa/on strategies outlined to achieve the City ’s
employment intens ity goals under Chapter 3 (Land U se & Redevelopment) and economic development and
compe//veness goals under C hapter 5 (C ommunity I mage, Economic C ompeveness & S tability);
3. M is -alignment w ith the purpos e of the City ’s B us ines s M ixed-U s e (M X-B) zoning dis trict, w hich is
intended to accommodate land for a mix of bus iness and light indus trial us es, with allow ances for
s uppor/ng retail/service uses that encourage a more dynamic and connected experience for w orkers; and
4. A ny future applica/ons for the us e will need to meet all condi/onal us e permit criteria as outlined
under S ec/on 35-7700, w hich in par t requires any condi/onal us e to be in accordance w ith the general and
s pecific obj ec/ves of the City ’s Comprehensive P lan and U D O, not be injurious to the us e and enjoyment of
other property in the immediate vicinity for purpos es alr eady permi@ed, and prov ide adequate meas ures to
provide ingres s , egress, and parking so des igned to minimiz e traffic conges /on in the public s treets.
R LU I PA
W hen C ity planning staff r eceives a reques t or applica/on from a religious ins /tu/on, they ar e required to
refer to the land use provisions outlined in the Religious L and Use and I ns /tu/onaliz ed Per s ons A ct of 2000
or “R LU I PA .” T his act pr otects , “indiv iduals , hous es of w ors hip, and other religious ins /tu/ons from
dis crimina/on in z oning and landmark ing law s .” H is tor ically, thos e protected under R LU I PA include: hous es
of w orship, individuals holding prayer mee/ngs in their home, religious s chools , religious r etr eat centers ,
cemeteries , and faith-bas ed s ocial s erv ices prov ided by a religious en/ty (e.g. Teen Challenge res iden/al
s ubs tance abuse center).
I t is important to note that R LU I PA is not a blanket exemp/on from z oning laws. I n general, religious
ins /tu/ons must apply for the s ame permits , follow the s ame r equir ements , and go through the s ame land
us e processes as other land us ers ; however, R LU I PA pr ohibits a local government from apply ing z oning
laws or regula/ons in a w ay that:
P laces substan/al burdens on religious exercis e
E x a mp l e: This prohibits the implementa/on of any land use r egula/on that impos es a
“substan/al bur den” on the religious exercis e of a person or religious assembly or
ins/tu/ons, except w here jus/fied by a “compelling governmental interes t” that the
government purs ues in the leas t res tric/ve w ay pos s ible.
Results in unequal treatment for religious assemblies and ins/tu/ons
Example: Not allow ing churches in zoning districts w here similar as s embly -type us es s uch as
theaters, mee/ng halls, s tadiums , or other places of as s embly ar e permi@ed. Requiring
religious ins /tu/ons to under take addi/onal meas ures as part of an applica/on process
which are not imposed on s ecular/non-religious as s emblies (e.g. a requirement that churches
obtain the prior approval of 60% of neighbors located w ithin a 1,300-foot radius ).
S upports, upholds , etc. religious or denomina/onal dis crimina/on
E xample: Not allow ing a place for r eligious as s embly or ins/tu/on purely on the bas is of
religion or religious denomina/on (e.g. allow ing for a church, but not a mosque, synagogue,
or temple).
Completely excludes religious assemblies
E xample: A government or municipality cannot totally exclude religious as s emblies fr om a
jurisdic/on. The City of Brooklyn C enter currently allow s “P laces for Religious A s s embly ” in
the R1, R2, C, and I z oning districts of the C ity.
Creates unreas onable limita/ons on religious assemblies
E x a mp l e: A government or municipality cannot unreasonably limit religious assemblies ,
ins/tu/ons, or structures w ithin a jurisdic/on.
I f there is ev er a conflict between R LU I PA and the C ity ’s z oning code or how it is applied, R LU I PA , as a
federal civil rights law, takes precedence.
Common accessory uses found at r eligious ins/tu/ons or “P laces for Religious A s s embly ” and oLen
cons idered to be acces s ory us es, include:
1. C hild day cares and aLer-s chool programming;
2. Religious schools;
3. Religious camps and retreat centers ;
4. A dult day cares ;
5. Food s helves and emergency overnight shelters ;
6. Faith-bas ed social s ervices , counseling, and offices (e.g. administra/on, call centers); and
7. C ommunity mee/ng s pace
P urs uant to M innes ota S tatutes S ec/on 327.3 0 , ci/es mus t now allow religious ins /tu/ons or “P laces for
Religious A ssembly ” the ability to s ite micr o units on r eligious pr oper ty to hous e chr onically homeless
individuals , extremely low -income indiv iduals, and volunteers w ho elect to mov e into the s e@lement as
inten/onal neighbors or “designated volunteers .”
S acred S elements
Beginning on J anuary 1, 2024, ci/es were r equir ed to allow micr o-unit dwellings on religious ins/tu/on
property as a per mi@ed or condi/onal us e, and no ma+er the zoning district. I n Brooklyn C enter, this
w ould apply w herever “P laces for Religious A s s embly ” are permi@ed.
I n B rook lyn Center, “P laces for Religious A s s embly ” are considered a condi/onal us e, and require approval
by City Council. I t s hould be noted that “condi/onal uses ” are generally cons idered permi7ed us es with the
caveat that they address the condi/onal use permit criteria under S ec/on 35-7700 as a means to mi/gate
poten/al nega/ve impacts on neighboring proper/es for us es alr eady permi@ed. G iven the protected s tatus
of religious ins/tu/ons under R LU I PA , a municipality would very likely need to allow for a “s acred
s e@lement,” if proposed, in the leas t burdens ome w ay pos s ible.
The following loca/ons are current s acred se@lement communi/es:
Mosaic C hris/an C ommunity in St. Paul (6 /ny ho mes—f o ur for people experiencing chronic homelessness
and c ata strophic loss of family, and two for people who have not experienced homelessness but desire to
be “inten/onal family ”)
P rince of Peace Lutheran Church in Ros eville (3 /ny homes)
Woodland H ills Church in M aplew ood has partnered with non-profit S e@led to build /ny homes out in a
designated s ec/on of the chur ch’s parking lot un/l they are taken off-s ite to a S e@led C ommunity. The
parking lot would remov e exis/ng bituminous and ins tall na/v e plan/ngs and ponding s o as to park the /ny
homes , be staged to feel like a community, and provide gather ing s paces and opportuni/es for community
engagement. The chur ch does not cur rently propos e us e of the /ny homes as living s pace at this property.
A ddi/onal proposals include Faith L utheran C hurch in Fores t Lake and Trinity L utheran in D uluth.
“S acred S e@lements ” are compris ed of micro-unit dwellings or /ny homes of no more than 400-square feet
in s ize, and are to be built on a permanent chas s is and anchored to pin founda/ons w ith fas tener s . A dry,
compostable, or plumbed toilet shall be provided in unit. Res idents s hall be provided access to water and
electric u/li/es either by connec/ng the micr o units to the u/li/es that are s erving the principal building on
the lot or by other compar able means , or by pr oviding the res idents acces s to permanent common kitchen
facili/es and common facili/es for toilet, bathing, and laundry in accordance with the R-2 boarding hous e
provis ions under Minnes ota Rules, part 1305.2902.
F unc/onally, a S acred S e@lement or community shall hav e between one-third and 4 0 percent (%) of the
micro units occupied by "des ignated v olunteers " who have not exper ienced homeles s nes s and hav e been
approved by a religious ins/tu/on to live in a s acred community as their sole form of hous ing.
F rom the z oning perspec/v e, S acred S e@lement micro units must comply w ith municipal s etback
requirements es tablis hed by ordinance for manufactured homes. A s the City of Brooklyn C enter does not
have a s eparate s etback requirement for manufactured homes , micro units w ould need to be s etback on all
s ides by at leas t ten (10) feet, which is les s than required for a typical R1 or R 2 dis trict home, or the s etback
requirements w ithin the City ’s C or I dis tricts, w hich currently allow for P laces for Religious A ssembly as a
condi/onal us e. The micro unit ’s exterior mater ials would need to be compa/ble in “composi/on,
appearance, and durability to the exterior materials used in s tandard residen/al cons truc/on.”
F or more informaon on S acred S e+lements and R LU I PA :
Minnesota S tatutes S econ 327.30 (S acred C ommunies and Micro-Unit D w ellings):
h@ps ://www.revis or.mn.gov/statutes/cite/327.30#:~:text=
(g)%20%22 S acred%20community%22,designated%20volunteers %20that%20meets %20the
Focus on New Laws: S acred S e7lement (L eague of Minnesota C ies):
h@ps ://www.lmc.org /new s -publica/ons /new s /all/fonl-sacred-s e@lements /
Religious Land U se and I nstuonalized Persons A ct (U S D epartment of Jusce – C ivil Rights D ivision):
h@ps ://www.jus /ce.gov/d9/2024-03/2024_doj_le@er_-_rluipa-final.pdf
B ackground:
Trinity I nterna/onal Fellowship (“the A pplicant ”) is a non-denomina/onal L iberian minis tr y that is
reques/ng a text amendment to C hapter 35 of the City C ode to allow for “P laces for Religious A ssembly ” as
a condi/onal use within the City ’s Bus ines s Mixed-Us e (M X-B) z oning dis trict. “Condi/onal uses ” are
generally cons idered permi7ed uses so long as certain condi/ons are met w ith res pect to the mi/ga/ng of
poten/ally nega/ve impacts on neighboring proper/es for uses alr eady permi@ed w ithin a dis trict, in
addi/on to other criteria.
D ue to the natur e of the request, a public hearing no/ce w as publis hed in the Brooklyn Center S un Post on
A ugust 2 9 , 2024. Mail no/fica/ons w ere sent to all 36 pr oper ty owners and phy s ical addres s es located
w ithin the C ity ’s Bus iness Mixed-Use (M X-B) D istrict. A public hearing no/ce w as also uploaded to the
City ’s webs ite.
A public hearing w as held at the S eptember 1 2 , 2024 P lanning Commission mee/ng, w her e the P lanning
Commission engaged in a lengthy discussion regarding the propos ed amendments . N o members of the
public were present for the public hearing other than r epr esenta/on of A pplicant Tr inity I nterna/onal
Fellow s hip and their architect, Vanman A rchitects, and no comments w ere submi@ed to City s taff in
advance of the mee/ng.
The C ommis s ioners as ked ques /ons on the us es allowed w ithin the Bus ines s Mixed-Us e (M X-B) z oning
dis trict, its intended purpos e as a dis trict, and the 2040 C omprehens iv e P lan future land use designa/on,
Busines s M ixed-U s e (B -M U ). C ity staff indicated that, while the 2 0 4 0 Comprehensiv e P lan and new
Busines s M ixed-U s e zoning dis trict provided more flexibility than in prior years, this area of the City is s /ll
largely a light indus tr ial dis trict, and the new us es permi@ed within this dis tr ict are us es that can be
cons idered as an amenity for employers and employ ees alike (e.g. restaurant acces s , hotels for bus iness
clients, grocery stores). P rior to submiUng an applica/on, City s taff had explored op/ons with the A pplicant
for crea/ng lesser impacts through perhaps re-z oning the property the A pplicant has an interest in, or
determining an assembly us e similar to that of a place for religious as s embly (e.g. movie theater s , s tadiums ,
event centers ); however, there are no s imilar type uses permi@ed w ithin the M X-B D is trict.
O ne of the commis s ioner s noted that the H eritage Center w as within this dis trict, to w hich City s taff stated
that it w as currently a non-conforming us e under the 2040 Comprehensiv e P lan and Unified D evelopment
O rdinance and as such, it w as not a like-for-like comparison. A nother commis s ioner inquired on w hether
event centers w ould be permi@ed to locate within the M X-B D is trict by allow ing for P laces for Religious
A s s embly and giv en that event center s are oL en/mes ancillar y uses of P laces for Religious A s s embly. C ity
s taff noted that P laces for Religious A s s embly are granted extra protec/ons under the Religious L and U s e
and I ns /tu/onalized Pers ons A ct (R LU I PA ) of 2000 and that a pr ivate event center would not be afforded
the same rights to locate w ithin the M X-B D is trict.
A nother commis s ioner noted that the es tablis hment of P laces for Religious A s s embly might be beneficial to
the industrial busines s es in that they w ould likely operate on off hour s in the M X-B D is trict and that w e
might perhaps allow for it and s ee what happens . C ity s taff r elayed that both the 2040 Comprehensive P lan
and U nified D ev elopment O rdinance outline non-indus tr ial us es as “s uppor /ng retail and s er vice us es ” that
encourage a mor e dynamic and connected experience for w or ker s . A lthough there may be lesser impacts by
opera/ng at off hours , C ity staff ques /oned w hether it provided any benefit to w orkers.
A s there is only one current P lace for Religious A ssembly located in an industrial ar ea of Brook lyn C enter
(4900 F rance Av enue N orth), C ity s taff noted concerns regarding impacts to the neighboring industrial
bus inesses in the I (G eneral I ndus try ) D is trict follow ing its approval in 2 0 2 0 in that it appear ed they w ere
not mee/ng their condi/ons of approval. O ne of the commis s ioners inquired on how City staff w ere
planning to addr es s these apparent v iola/ons . A ddi/onal ques/ons s urr ounded how likely it was that a
property in the Bus iness M ixed-U s e (M X-B) D is trict might convert to a P lace for Religious A ssembly.
Two of the commissioners noted that, while it cannot be considered as a r eas on for determina/on as part of
a land us e applica/on and under the P lanning Commission’s s cope of du/es , there are cons idera/ons as to
how P laces for Religious A ssembly w ould strengthen the C ity ’s tax bas e and par/cularly as the 2040
Comprehensive P lan outlines the Bus iness M ixed-U s e (B-M U) land us e designa/on as the C ity ’s greatest
opportunity to provide employment intensity and be compe//ve economically as a city.
The commissioners fur ther noted concer ns regarding poten/al impacts to exis/ng light industrial
bus inesses here in the C ity (e.g. non-complementary uses , impacts to bus iness oper a/ons ), our s upport
and protec/on of them, and whether intr oducing this us e w ould be in keeping w ith providing the “highest
and bes t ” us es for a given ar ea of the C ity. O ne commis s ioner noted concerns of poten/ally s pot z oning the
property of interest.
Following clos e of the public hearing, the P lanning Commission elected to r ecommend (3-2) City Council
approval of the r eques ted ordinance amendment to S ec/on 3 5 -4 1 0 3 (A llowed Use Table) to allow for
P laces for Religious A s s embly as a condi/onal use in the Bus iness M ixed-U s e (M X-B) D is trict.
A copy of the P lanning C ommis s ion Report for P lanning C ommis s ion A pplica/on No. 2024-011, dated
S eptember 12, 2024 and or dinance amendment language is included with this memorandum. C opies of the
new Minnes ota S tate S tatute language r egar ding S acred S e@lements, as w ell as an ar/cle from the League
of Minnes ota are also included as reference.
B udget I ssues:
None to cons ider at this /me.
I nclusive C ommunity Engagement:
A nracist/Equity Policy Effect:
AT TA C H M E N TS :
D escrip/on U pload D ate Type
C ouncil Memo - P C A pplica/on No. 2024-011 (O ctober 14,
2024)10/10/2024 Cover Memo
L eague of Minnes ota C i/es A r/cle - Focus on New Law s
(S acred S e@lements )10/10/2024 Backup M aterial
M N S tatutes L anguage - S acred Communi/es and Micro Unit
D w ellings 10/10/2024 Backup M aterial
S taff Reports and Exhibits - O rdinance A mendment to A llow for
P laces for Religious A ssembly in the M X-B Zoning D is trict 10/10/2024 Backup M aterial
O rdinance Language - A mendment to S ec/on 35-4103 9/18/2024 O rdinance
S eptember 23, 2024 C ouncil Pow er Point - P C A pplica/on No.
2024-011 9/24/2024 P resenta/on
City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3330 |
www.brooklyncentermn.gov
BR291-16-981295.v1
DATE: October 14, 2024
TO: Dr. Reggie Edwards, City Manager
THROUGH: Jesse Anderson, Community Development Director
FROM: Ginny McIntosh, Planning Manager
SUBJECT: An Ordinance Amending Section 35-4103 (Allowed Use Table) of the City Code of
Ordinances Regarding Places for Religious Assembly in the Business Mixed-Use (MX-B)
District –2nd Reading
Recommendation:
Motion to deny the zoning text amendment proposed by Applicant Trinity International Fellowship
regarding Section 35-4103 (Allowed Use Table) of the City Code of Ordinances, and as outlined under
Planning Commission Application No. 2024-011, that would allow for Places for Religious Assembly as a
conditional use within the Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) District.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested amendment on a 3-2 vote at their
September 12, 2024 meeting. At the September 23, 2024 City Council meeting, a request was made to
table the first reading of the proposed ordinance amendment and a request for additional information
was made.
City staff maintains the position that, based on the findings presented within the provided staff report,
the requested ordinance amendment should be denied; however, if City Council elects to
recommend approval of the request to amend Section 35-4103 (Allowed Use Table) to allow for Places
for Religious Assembly as a conditional use in the Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) District, the motion language
should be to approve the second reading and adopt the ordinance amendment.
Rationale for City Staff Recommendation
At the September 23, 2024 City Council meeting, City staff presented a first reading of a request to amend
the City’s Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) to allow for “Places for Religious Assembly” in the City’s
Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) District as a conditional use. The application request was submitted by
Applicant Trinity International Fellowship who has an interest in purchasing an MX-B zoned property.
Following a presentation by City staff, and questions posed by the City Council to City staff and the
Applicant, a request to table consideration of the first reading of the application request to the October
14, 2024 meeting was made. As part of that request, City Council had requested additional information
on “Sacred Settlements” and clarification as to City staff’s recommendation of denial for the application
request.
City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3330 |
www.brooklyncentermn.gov
The request for additional information on Sacred Settlements stems from conversations following the
September 12, 2024 Planning Commission meeting, in which the City Attorney informed City staff that a
bill was passed during this last legislative session and went into effect on January 1, 2024 regarding
“Sacred Settlements.” This information was not provided to the Planning Commission during their review
of the requested ordinance amendment, but would allow religious institutions to site micro-unit dwellings
on properties owned by religious institutions. City staff is currently unsure as to whether these micro-unit
dwellings would be of consideration or feasible on any of the properties within the Business Mixed-Use
(MX-B) District given how new this legislation is; however, additional information has been provided.
City staff recommended denial of Planning Commission Application No. 2024-011. This determination
was made based on the following:
1. Applicant responses to the ordinance amendment, which were answered specific to the one
property of interest (6010 Earle Brown Drive) as opposed to addressing the potential impacts of
allowing for “Places for Religious Assembly” in the greater Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) District,
which would affect 36 properties;
2. Non-conformity with the City of Brooklyn Center’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, including the
purpose of the Business Mixed-Use (B-MU) land use designation, which substantially aligns with
the City’s Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) zoning district, and the implementation strategies outlined
to achieve the City’s employment intensity goals under Chapter 3 (Land Use & Redevelopment)
and economic development and competitiveness goals under Chapter 5 (Community Image,
Economic Competitiveness & Stability);
3. Mis-alignment with the purpose of the City’s Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) zoning district, which is
intended to accommodate land for a mix of business and light industrial uses, with allowances for
supporting retail/service uses that encourage a more dynamic and connected experience for
workers; and
4. Any future applications for the use will need to meet all conditional use permit criteria as outlined
under Section 35-7700, which in part requires any conditional use to be in accordance with the
general and specific objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and UDO, not be injurious to the
use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for purposes already permitted,
and provide adequate measures to provide ingress, egress, and parking so designed to minimize
traffic congestion in the public streets.
RLUIPA
When City planning staff receives a request or application from a religious institution, they are required
to refer to the land use provisions outlined in the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of
2000 or “RLUIPA.” This act protects, “individuals, houses of worship, and other religious institutions from
discrimination in zoning and landmarking laws.” Historically, those protected under RLUIPA include:
houses of worship, individuals holding prayer meetings in their home, religious schools, religious retreat
centers, cemeteries, and faith-based social services provided by a religious entity (e.g. Teen Challenge
residential substance abuse center).
City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3330 |
www.brooklyncentermn.gov
It is important to note that RLUIPA is not a blanket exemption from zoning laws. In general, religious
institutions must apply for the same permits, follow the same requirements, and go through the same
land use processes as other land users; however, RLUIPA prohibits a local government from applying
zoning laws or regulations in a way that:
• Places substantial burdens on religious exercise
o Example: This prohibits the implementation of any land use regulation that imposes a
“substantial burden” on the religious exercise of a person or religious assembly or
institutions, except where justified by a “compelling governmental interest” that the
government pursues in the least restrictive way possible.
• Results in unequal treatment for religious assemblies and institutions
o Example: Not allowing churches in zoning districts where similar assembly-type uses such
as theaters, meeting halls, stadiums, or other places of assembly are permitted. Requiring
religious institutions to undertake additional measures as part of an application process
which are not imposed on secular/non-religious assemblies (e.g. a requirement that
churches obtain the prior approval of 60% of neighbors located within a 1,300-foot
radius).
• Supports, upholds, etc. religious or denominational discrimination
o Example: Not allowing a place for religious assembly or institution purely on the basis of
religion or religious denomination (e.g. allowing for a church, but not a mosque,
synagogue, or temple).
• Completely excludes religious assemblies
o Example: A government or municipality cannot totally exclude religious assemblies from
a jurisdiction. The City of Brooklyn Center currently allows “Places for Religious Assembly”
in the R1, R2, C, and I zoning districts of the City.
• Creates unreasonable limitations on religious assemblies
o Example: A government or municipality cannot unreasonably limit religious assemblies,
institutions, or structures within a jurisdiction.
If there is ever a conflict between RLUIPA and the City’s zoning code or how it is applied, RLUIPA, as a
federal civil rights law, takes precedence.
Common accessory uses found at religious institutions or “Places for Religious Assembly” and often
considered to be accessory uses, include:
1. Child day cares and after-school programming;
2. Religious schools;
3. Religious camps and retreat centers;
4. Adult day cares;
City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3330 |
www.brooklyncentermn.gov
5. Food shelves and emergency overnight shelters;
6. Faith-based social services, counseling, and offices (e.g. administration, call centers); and
7. Community meeting space
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 327.30, cities must now allow religious institutions or “Places for
Religious Assembly” the ability to site micro units on religious property to house chronically homeless
individuals, extremely low-income individuals, and volunteers who elect to move into the settlement as
intentional neighbors or “designated volunteers.”
Sacred Settlements
Beginning on January 1, 2024, cities were required to allow micro-unit dwellings on religious institution
property as a permitted or conditional use, and no matter the zoning district. In Brooklyn Center, this
would apply wherever “Places for Religious Assembly” are permitted.
In Brooklyn Center, “Places for Religious Assembly” are considered a conditional use, and require approval
by City Council. It should be noted that “conditional uses” are generally considered permitted uses with
the caveat that they address the conditional use permit criteria under Section 35-7700 as a means to
mitigate potential negative impacts on neighboring properties for uses already permitted. Given the
protected status of religious institutions under RLUIPA, a municipality would very likely need to allow for
a “sacred settlement,” if proposed, in the least burdensome way possible.
The following locations are current sacred settlement communities:
• Mosaic Christian Community in St. Paul (6 tiny homes—four for people experiencing
chronic homelessness and catastrophic loss of family, and two for people who have not
experienced homelessness but desire to be “intentional family”);
• Prince of Peace Lutheran Church in Roseville (3 tiny homes)
Woodland Hills Church in Maplewood has partnered with non-profit Settled to build tiny homes out in a
designated section of the church’s parking lot until they are taken off-site to a Settled Community. The
parking lot would remove existing bituminous and install native plantings and ponding so as to park the
tiny homes, be staged to feel like a community, and provide gathering spaces and opportunities for
community engagement. The church does not currently propose use of the tiny homes as living space at
this property. Additional proposals include Faith Lutheran Church in Forest Lake and Trinity Lutheran in
Duluth.
“Sacred Settlements” are comprised of micro-unit dwellings or tiny homes of no more than 400-square
feet in size, and are to be built on a permanent chassis and anchored to pin foundations with fasteners. A
dry, compostable, or plumbed toilet shall be provided in unit. Residents shall be provided access to water
and electric utilities either by connecting the micro units to the utilities that are serving the principal
building on the lot or by other comparable means, or by providing the residents access to permanent
common kitchen facilities and common facilities for toilet, bathing, and laundry in accordance with the R-
2 boarding house provisions under Minnesota Rules, part 1305.2902.
City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3330 |
www.brooklyncentermn.gov
Functionally, a Sacred Settlement or community shall have between one-third and 40 percent (%) of the
micro units occupied by “designated volunteers” who have not experienced homelessness and have been
approved by a religious institution to live in a sacred community as their sole form of housing.
From the zoning perspective, Sacred Settlement micro units must comply with municipal setback
requirements established by ordinance for manufactured homes. As the City of Brooklyn Center does not
have a separate setback requirement for manufactured homes, micro units would need to be setback on
all sides by at least ten (10) feet, which is less than required for a typical R1 or R2 district home, or the
setback requirements within the City’s C or I districts, which currently allow for Places for Religious
Assembly as a conditional use. The micro unit’s exterior materials would need to be compatible in
“composition, appearance, and durability to the exterior materials used in standard residential
construction.”
For more information on Sacred Settlements and RLUIPA:
Minnesota Statutes Section 327.30 (Sacred Communities and Micro-Unit Dwellings):
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/327.30#:~:text=(g)%20%22Sacred%20community%22,design
ated%20volunteers%20that%20meets%20the
Focus on New Laws: Sacred Settlement (League of Minnesota Cities):
https://www.lmc.org/news-publications/news/all/fonl-sacred-settlements/
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (US Department of Justice – Civil Rights Division):
https://www.justice.gov/d9/2024-03/2024_doj_letter_-_rluipa-final.pdf
Background:
Trinity International Fellowship (“the Applicant”) is a non-denominational Liberian ministry that is
requesting a text amendment to Chapter 35 of the City Code to allow for “Places for Religious Assembly”
as a conditional use within the City’s Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) zoning district. “Conditional uses” are
generally considered permitted uses so long as certain conditions are met with respect to the mitigating
of potentially negative impacts on neighboring properties for uses already permitted within a district, in
addition to other criteria.
Due to the nature of the request, a public hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on
August 29, 2024. Mail notifications were sent to all 36 property owners and physical addresses located
within the City’s Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) District. A public hearing notice was also uploaded to the
City’s website.
A public hearing was held at the September 12, 2024 Planning Commission meeting, where the Planning
Commission engaged in a lengthy discussion regarding the proposed amendments. No members of the
public were present for the public hearing other than representation of Applicant Trinity International
Fellowship and their architect, Vanman Architects, and no comments were submitted to City staff in
advance of the meeting.
The Commissioners asked questions on the uses allowed within the Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) zoning
district, its intended purpose as a district, and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan future land use designation,
Business Mixed-Use (B-MU). City staff indicated that, while the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and new
City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3330 |
www.brooklyncentermn.gov
Business Mixed-Use zoning district provided more flexibility than in prior years, this area of the City is still
largely a light industrial district, and the new uses permitted within this district are uses that can be
considered as an amenity for employers and employees alike (e.g. restaurant access, hotels for business
clients, grocery stores). Prior to submitting an application, City staff had explored options with the
Applicant for creating lesser impacts through perhaps re-zoning the property the Applicant has an interest
in, or determining an assembly use similar to that of a place for religious assembly (e.g. movie theaters,
stadiums, event centers); however, there are no similar type uses permitted within the MX-B District.
One of the commissioners noted that the Heritage Center was within this district, to which City staff stated
that it was currently a non-conforming use under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development
Ordinance and as such, it was not a like-for-like comparison. Another commissioner inquired on whether
event centers would be permitted to locate within the MX-B District by allowing for Places for Religious
Assembly and given that event centers are oftentimes ancillary uses of Places for Religious Assembly. City
staff noted that Places for Religious Assembly are granted extra protections under the Religious Land Use
and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) of 2000 and that a private event center would not be afforded
the same rights to locate within the MX-B District.
Another commissioner noted that the establishment of Places for Religious Assembly might be beneficial
to the industrial businesses in that they would likely operate on off hours in the MX-B District and that we
might perhaps allow for it and see what happens. City staff relayed that both the 2040 Comprehensive
Plan and Unified Development Ordinance outline non-industrial uses as “supporting retail and service
uses” that encourage a more dynamic and connected experience for workers. Although there may be
lesser impacts by operating at off hours, City staff questioned whether it provided any benefit to workers.
As there is only one current Place for Religious Assembly located in an industrial area of Brooklyn Center
(4900 France Avenue North), City staff noted concerns regarding impacts to the neighboring industrial
businesses in the I (General Industry) District following its approval in 2020 in that it appeared they were
not meeting their conditions of approval. One of the commissioners inquired on how City staff were
planning to address these apparent violations. Additional questions surrounded how likely it was that a
property in the Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) District might convert to a Place for Religious Assembly.
Two of the commissioners noted that, while it cannot be considered as a reason for determination as part
of a land use application and under the Planning Commission’s scope of duties, there are considerations
as to how Places for Religious Assembly would strengthen the City’s tax base and particularly as the 2040
Comprehensive Plan outlines the Business Mixed-Use (B-MU) land use designation as the City’s greatest
opportunity to provide employment intensity and be competitive economically as a city.
The commissioners further noted concerns regarding potential impacts to existing light industrial
businesses here in the City (e.g. non-complementary uses, impacts to business operations), our support
and protection of them, and whether introducing this use would be in keeping with providing the “highest
and best” uses for a given area of the City. One commissioner noted concerns of potentially spot zoning
the property of interest.
Following close of the public hearing, the Planning Commission elected to recommend (3-2) City Council
approval of the requested ordinance amendment to Section 35-4103 (Allowed Use Table) to allow for
Places for Religious Assembly as a conditional use in the Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) District.
A copy of the Planning Commission Report for Planning Commission Application No. 2024-011, dated
September 12, 2024 and ordinance amendment language is included with this memorandum. Copies of
City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3330 |
www.brooklyncentermn.gov
the new Minnesota State Statute language regarding Sacred Settlements, as well as an article from the
League of Minnesota are also included as reference.
Focus on New Laws: Sacred
Settlements
September 5, 2023
Beginning Jan. 1, 2024, cities must allow faith communities to site micro units on religious
property to house chronically homeless individuals, extremely low-income individuals, and
volunteers.
During the 2023 legislative session, the Legislature passed a bill authorizing religious
institutions beginning Jan.1, 2024, to site micro-unit dwellings on religious institution property.
It also requires cities to permit sacred settlements of micro units either via a permitted use or
conditional use.
The bill was signed into law as Chapter 53 in 2023 Session Law. The language can be found in
Chapter 53, Article 11, Section 57.
Micro-unit eligibility
Micro-unit dwellings within sacred settlements are intended to provide an additional means
for faith communities to serve chronically homeless individuals, designated volunteers, and
extremely low-income individuals in accordance with their religious vocations.
An individual who meets the definition of being chronically homeless is someone who is
unhoused and lives or resides in a place not meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or in
an emergency shelter for at least one year, or on at least four separate occasions in the last
three years.
An individual who meets the definition of being extremely low income has an income that is
equal to or less than 30% of the area median income.
A designated volunteer is an individual who has not experienced homelessness and is
approved by the religious institution to live in the sacred settlement as their sole form of
housing.
The language defines a religious institution to include a church, synagogue, mosque, or
religious organization organized under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 315.
Micro-unit requirements
There are myriad of requirements and minimum standards in the statutory language that
address both the standards for the micro units themselves as well as requirements and
restrictions for faith communities that chose to establish a sacred settlement of micro units on
their religious property.
Under the new law, micro units must meet certain building requirements and standards to be
allowed for placement in a sacred settlement on religious property.
10/10/24, 10:07 AM Focus on New Laws: Sacred Settlements - League of Minnesota Cities
https://www.lmc.org/news-publications/news/all/fonl-sacred-settlements/1/3
All micro units must be built to the requirements of the American National Standards Institute
(ANSI) Code 119.5, which includes standards for heating, electrical, fire, and life safety.
Additionally, micro units are subject to inspection for compliance with statutory standards and
must meet the following minimum requirements:
Be no more than 400 gross square feet.
Be built on a permanent chassis and anchored to pin foundations with engineered fasteners.
Have exterior material compatible in composition, appearance, and durability to materials
used in standard residential construction.
Meet minimum framing standards and insulation ratings for doors and windows and include
a dry, compostable, or plumbed toilet meeting Minnesota Pollution Control Agency rules.
Include smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and comply with municipal setback
requirements if established by ordinance or be set back on all sides by at least 10 feet if no
ordinance exists.
Have access to water and electric utilities either by connecting the units to the principal
building or by providing access to permanent common kitchen facilities and common
facilities for toilet, bathing, and laundry consistent with boarding house requirements under
Minnesota Rules, part 1305.2902.
Minimum standards for settlements
In addition to the requirements for individual units, the law establishes minimum standards
for the religious institutionʼs operation of the settlement itself, which will be important to
reference if a city choses to permit settlements and units via a conditional use permit to ensure
compliance.
Minimum standards for settlements include:
Appropriate level of insurance and have between one-third and 40% of the micro units
occupied by designated volunteers.
Adherence to all laws governing landlord and tenants under Minnesota Statutes Chapter
504B.
A written plan provided to the city in which the settlement is approved by the religious
institutionʼs governing board that includes:
Plans for disposal of water and sewage if not plumped and septic tank drainage if plumped
units are not connected to the primary worship locationʼs system.
Adequate parking, lighting, and access to units by emergency vehicles.
Protocols for security and addressing conduct within the settlement as well as safety
protocols for severe weather.
Authorization by a municipality as either a permitted use or conditional use without the
application of additional standards not included in the bill.
Fur ther considerations
The League recommends that cities be in communication with the religious institutions in
their community and inquire about their plans with respect to this new law.
10/10/24, 10:07 AM Focus on New Laws: Sacred Settlements - League of Minnesota Cities
https://www.lmc.org/news-publications/news/all/fonl-sacred-settlements/2/3
Additionally, consider specific parameters in a conditional use permit or ordinance to ensure
compliance for micro units and sacred settlements that are outlined in statute leading up to the
effective date of Jan. 1, 2024.
The League will continue to closely monitor the impacts of this language and continue to help
provide guidance to cities on this new law.
Read more news articles
Your LMC Resource
Daniel Lightfoot
IGR Representative & Federal Relations Manager
(651) 281-1295 or (800) 925-1122
dlightfoot@lmc.org
10/10/24, 10:07 AM Focus on New Laws: Sacred Settlements - League of Minnesota Cities
https://www.lmc.org/news-publications/news/all/fonl-sacred-settlements/3/3
327.30 SACRED COMMUNITIES AND MICRO-UNIT DWELLINGS.
Subdivision 1.Definitions.(a) For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings
given.
(b) "Chronically homeless" means an individual who:
(1) is homeless and lives or resides in a place not meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter;
(2) has been homeless and living or residing in a place not meant for human habitation, a safe haven,
or in an emergency shelter continuously for at least one year or on at least four separate occasions in the last
three years; and
(3) has an adult head of household, or a minor head-of-household if no adult is present in the household,
with a diagnosable substance use disorder, serious mental illness, developmental disability, post-traumatic
stress disorder, cognitive impairments resulting from a brain injury, or chronic physical illness or disability,
including the co-occurrence of two or more of those conditions.
(c) "Designated volunteers" means persons who have not experienced homelessness and have been
approved by the religious institution to live in a sacred community as their sole form of housing.
(d) "Extremely low income" means an income that is equal to or less than 30 percent of the area median
income, adjusted for family size, as estimated by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
(e) "Micro unit" means a mobile residential dwelling providing permanent housing within a sacred
community that meets the requirements of subdivision 4.
(f) "Religious institution" means a church, synagogue, mosque, or other religious organization organized
under chapter 315.
(g) "Sacred community" means a residential settlement established on or contiguous to the grounds of
a religious institution's primary worship location primarily for the purpose of providing permanent housing
for chronically homeless persons, extremely low-income persons, and designated volunteers that meets the
requirements of subdivision 3.
Subd. 2.Dwelling in micro units in sacred communities authorized.Religious institutions are
authorized to provide permanent housing to people who are chronically homeless, extremely low-income,
or designated volunteers, in sacred communities composed of micro units subject to the provisions of this
section. Each religious institution that has sited a sacred community must annually certify to the local unit
of government that it has complied with the eligibility requirements for residents of a sacred community in
this section.
Subd. 3.Sacred community requirements.(a) A sacred community must provide residents of micro
units access to water and electric utilities either by connecting the micro units to the utilities that are serving
the principal building on the lot or by other comparable means, or by providing the residents access to
permanent common kitchen facilities and common facilities for toilet, bathing, and laundry with the number
and type of fixtures required for an R-2 boarding house under Minnesota Rules, part 1305.2902. Any units
that are plumbed shall not be included in determining the minimum number of fixtures required for the
common facilities.
(b) A sacred community under this section must:
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes
327.30MINNESOTA STATUTES 20231
(1) be appropriately insured;
(2) have between one-third and 40 percent of the micro units occupied by designated volunteers; and
(3) provide the municipality with a written plan approved by the religious institution's governing board
that outlines:
(i) disposal of water and sewage from micro units if not plumbed;
(ii) septic tank drainage if plumbed units are not hooked up to the primary worship location's system;
(iii) adequate parking, lighting, and access to units by emergency vehicles;
(iv) protocols for security and addressing conduct within the settlement; and
(v) safety protocols for severe weather.
(c) Unless the municipality has designated sacred communities meeting the requirements of this section
as permitted uses, a sacred community meeting the requirements of this section shall be approved and
regulated as a conditional use without the application of additional standards not included in this section.
When approved, additional permitting is not required for individual micro units.
(d) Sacred communities are subject to the laws governing landlords and tenants under chapter 504B.
Subd. 4.Micro unit requirements.(a) In order to be eligible to be placed within a sacred community,
a micro unit must be built to the requirements of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Code
119.5, which includes standards for heating, electrical systems, and fire and life safety. A micro unit must
also meet the following technical requirements:
(1) be no more than 400 gross square feet;
(2) be built on a permanent chassis and anchored to pin foundations with engineered fasteners;
(3) have exterior materials that are compatible in composition, appearance, and durability to the exterior
materials used in standard residential construction;
(4) have a minimum insulation rating of R-20 in walls, R-30 in floors, and R-38 in ceilings, as well as
residential grade insulated doors and windows;
(5) have a dry, compostable, or plumbed toilet or other system meeting the requirements of the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency, Chapters 7035, 7040, 7049, and 7080, or other applicable rules;
(6) have either an electrical system that meets NFPA 70 NEC, section 551 or 552 as applicable or a low
voltage electrical system that meets ANSI/RVIA Low Voltage Standard, current edition;
(7) have minimum wall framing with two inch by four inch wood or metal studs with framing of 16
inches to 24 inches on center, or the equivalent in structural insulated panels, with a floor load of 40 pounds
per square foot and a roof live load of 42 pounds per square foot; and
(8) have smoke and carbon monoxide detectors installed.
(b) All micro units, including their anchoring, must be inspected and certified for compliance with these
requirements by a licensed Minnesota professional engineer or qualified third-party inspector for ANSI
compliance accredited pursuant to either the American Society for Testing and Materials Appendix E541
or ISO/IEC 17020.
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes
2MINNESOTA STATUTES 2023327.30
(c) Micro units that connect to utilities such as water, sewer, gas, or electric, must obtain any permits
or inspections required by the municipality or utility company for that connection.
(d) Micro units must comply with municipal setback requirements established by ordinance for
manufactured homes. If a municipality does not have such an ordinance, micro units must be set back on
all sides by at least ten feet.
History: 2023 c 53 art 11 s 57
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes
327.30MINNESOTA STATUTES 20233
App. No. 2024-011
PC 09/12/2024
Page 1
Planning Commission Report
Meeting Date: September 12, 2024
Application No. 2024-011
Applicant | Property Owner: Trinity International Fellowship | MINMOR LLC
Requests: Ordinance Amendment (Text)
Map 1. Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) District Properties.
REQUESTED ACTION
Trinity International Fellowship (“the Applicant”) is a non-denominational Liberian ministry that is
requesting a text amendment to Chapter 35 of the City Code to allow for “places for religious assembly”
as a conditional use within the City’s Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) zoning district. In August 2023, City
Council held a work session with the Applicant and at that time, City Council expressed a general openness
to exploring an opportunity for religious assembly uses within the MX-B zoning district—refer to Exhibit
A.
Due to the nature of the request, a public hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post
on August 29, 2024. Mail notifications were sent to all 36 property owners and physical addresses located
within the City’s Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) District—refer to Exhibit B. A public hearing notice was also
uploaded to the City’s website.
•Application Filed: 08/13/2024
•Review Period (60-day) Deadline:
•Extension Declared:
•Extended Review Period Deadline: N/A
App. No. 2024-011
PC 09/12/2024
Page 2
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (TEXT)
Background
In August 2023, City Council held a concept review of a proposal to allow for places for religious assembly
in the Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) District. City staff presented the proposal to City Council, identifying
points to consider regarding a proposed conversion of 6010 Earle Brown Drive from an office use to a
place for religious assembly, and potential impacts to other properties located within the MX-B District,
of which in part included parking and traffic concerns and considerations for the greater MX-B District—
refer to Exhibit C.
It should be noted that, prior to discussions on amending the City’s Code, City staff reviewed the property
of interest (6010 Earle Brown Drive) for opportunities to perhaps re-zone the property, as this would result
in lesser impacts to the greater Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) zoning district; however, the surrounding
properties are either similarly zoned (MX-B District), Commercial Mixed-Use (which do not allow for
“Places for Religious Assembly”), or a Planned Unit Development (i.e. the Lux Apartments and Ecumen
Prairie Lodge).
Map 2. Property of Interest (in red) and Adjacent Property Zoning.
Table 1. Current District Allowances for Places for Religious Assembly.
City staff also looked at similar uses in the MX-B District as the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized
Persons Act (RLUIPA) protects religious institutions against discrimination in zoning; however, the most
App. No. 2024-011
PC 09/12/2024
Page 3
similar public assembly type uses, such as event centers (accessory use only), movie theaters, amusement
centers, and fraternal lodges, etc. are not permitted in the MX-B District as a permitted or conditional use.
Rezoning the property of interest (6010 Earle Brown Drive) from its current zoning designation of MX-B
to one of the above zoning districts that allow for places for religious assembly (i.e. R1, R2, C, and I
Districts) would likely constitute “spot zoning,” which is prohibited within the state of Minnesota.
Although the definition of the term “spot zoning” can vary from state to state, Anderson’s American Law
of Zoning, 4th Edition cites spot zoning as, “the process of singling out a small parcel of land for a use
classification totally different from that of the surrounding area for the benefit of the owner of such
property and to the detriment of other owners.” As the above-mentioned districts are not in close
proximity or adjacent to the property of interest, it was determined that an ordinance amendment to the
entire Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) District would be the only path forward for the Applicant.
Per Section 35-71301 (Applicability), an amendment of the City’s Unified Development Ordinance may be
initiated by the City Council, Planning Commission, or a City property owner. In this particular case, the
Applicant has an interest in purchasing 6010 Earle Brown Drive, which is located within the City’s Business
Mixed-Use (MX-B) District, and obtained permission from Property Owner MINMOR LLC to apply for a
text amendment that would allow for “Places for Religious Assembly” as a conditional use within the
aforementioned MX-B District. It should be noted that “conditional uses” are generally permitted uses so
long as certain conditions are met with respect to the mitigating of potentially negative impacts on
neighboring properties for uses already permitted within a district.
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4013 ALLOWED USE TABLE OF THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING
PLACES OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY IN THE BUSINESS MIXED-USE ZONING DISTRICT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Article I. Brooklyn Center City Code, Chapter 35, Section 35-4103 Allowed Use Table is amended by adding the following
double-underlined language:
P = PERMITTED USE, C = CONDITIONAL USE, I = INTERIM USE, A = ACCESSORY USE
Residential Commercial/ Mixed Use Nonresidential
Use-Specific
Standards
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
M X-
N1
M X-
N2
M X-
C
TO D
C
MX-
B
I
O
PUBLIC, INSTITUTIONAL, AND CIVIC USES
COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL FACILITIES
Places for religious assembly C C C C C
(Strikeout indicates matter to be deleted, double-underline indicates new matter.)
Per discussions with the Applicant and Property Owner, there is no current purchase agreement in place.
Although a work session was held in August 2023 with the City Council to discuss the proposal, the
Applicant has spent the past year fundraising and working on plans for a potential buildout of 6010 Earle
Brown Drive. The Applicant would need to enter into a purchase agreement with the Property Owner
App. No. 2024-011
PC 09/12/2024
Page 4
pending approval of the requested ordinance amendment to the MX-B District and receive separate
approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for 6010 Earle Brown Drive in order to proceed.
The approximately 20,000-square foot building of interest was originally approved as a City-County
Federal Credit Union location and drive-thru under the then C2 (Commerce) District in 1988. The current
owners, MINMOR LLC (Minmor Industries), purchased the property of interest in 2008 for their business,
which primarily works in the printing, packaging, and promotions industries under its numerous
companies (i.e. Mello Smello, OlymPak, Kidcentives, Mission Nutrition, and Safety Stop). Given shifts in
the locations of their employees and operations, the building has been underutilized for a number of years
and has been for sale or lease off and on for the last few years.
In reviewing requests for ordinance amendments, certain amendment criteria shall be considered as
outlined under Section 35-71304 (Amendment Criteria). The Planning Commission and City Council shall
review the necessary submittal requirements, facts, circumstances of the proposed amendment, and
make a recommendation and decision on the amendment based on, but not limited to, consideration of
the following criteria and policies:
a.Whether there is a clear and public need or benefit;
b.Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use
classifications;
c.Whether all permitted uses in the proposed zoning district can be contemplated for development
of the subject property;
d.Whether there have been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area since
the subject property was zoned;
e.Whether there is an evident, broad public purpose in the case of City-initiated rezoning proposals;
f.Whether the subject property will bear fully the UDO development restrictions for the proposed
zoning districts;
g.Whether the subject property is generally unsuited for uses permitted in the present zoning
district, with respect to size, configuration, topography, or location;
h.Whether the rezoning will result in the expansion of a zoning district, warranted by:
1)Comprehensive Planning;
2)The lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district; or
3)The best interests of the community.
i. Whether the proposal demonstrates merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of an
individual parcel.
j.The specific policies and recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan and other City plans;
k.The purpose and intent of this UDO, or in the case of a map amendment, whether it meets the
purpose and intent of the individual district; and
l.If applicable, the adequacy to buffer or transition between potentially incompatible districts.
2040 Comprehensive Plan
The City’s Business Mixed-Use (B-MU) land use designation, which is in alignment with the City’s defined
MX-B zoning district, is brand new under the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and is geographically
located along a portion of Earle Brown Drive, and north of Interstate 694 off Freeway Boulevard and
Shingle Creek Parkway. A Planned Unit Development zoned PUD/I1 and located off Parkway Circle is also
included within the B-MU designation. This designation, “guides for a mix of businesses, light industrial,
and supporting retail/service uses. This designation encourages redevelopment or development of
commercial, office, general business, and light industrial uses in coordination with supporting
App. No. 2024-011
PC 09/12/2024
Page 5
retail/commercial uses to encourage a more dynamic and connected experience for workers. This land
use does not plan for residential uses but may include limited live-work opportunities as established
through supporting official controls.”
Map 3. Business Mixed-Use (B-MU) Land Use Designation – 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
The Business Mixed-Use (B-MU) future land use designation is one of the five (5) land uses that are
identified for places of new or expected additional employment within the City of Brooklyn Center, with
the Business Mixed-Use (B-MU) land use designation anticipated to account for the greatest added
employment intensity (1,303) and 100% expected commercial or industrial usage across its 269 acres of
the City. Further, almost the entire B-MU land use designation is identified as a “potential area for
change.” As the City is predominantly a, “bedroom community,” with the overwhelming majority of lands
reserved for low density residential (e.g. R1 District), there are limited opportunities to add any major
employment opportunities with the exception of the following land use designations: Transit-Oriented
Development, Neighborhood Mixed-Use, Commercial Mixed-Use, Commercial, and Business Mixed-Use.
With that said, the City’s Commercial Mixed-Use (C-MU) and Business Mixed-Use (B-MU) land use
designations are identified within the 2040 Plan as “vibrant business centers” that are focused more
heavily on commercial, retail, office, and light industrial uses while continuing to emphasize the concept
of creating “experiences for the users.” The purpose is to promote and encourage businesses, commercial
users, retailers, etc. to plan for interconnected systems that result in a more active vibrant employment
center, and shift away from the traditional isolated campuses and strip mall concepts.
A key focus of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is Chapter 5 (Community Image, Economic Competitiveness,
and Stability), which reinforces the City’s vision to commit to redefining, reimagining, and redeveloping
key areas of the community with plans to elevate Brooklyn Center to an economically competitive City
within the greater region. This is defined as the, “City’s ability to compete effectively for economic
development that creates jobs, brings and retains corporations, successfully incubates new businesses
App. No. 2024-011
PC 09/12/2024
Page 6
and services on a local, regional, national, and international scale.” It also references the ability of the City
to attract jobs and employment that serves its residents, and emphasizes opportunities to access
education, job skills matching, and an improved quality of life for all of its residents.
It is recognized that the City of Brooklyn Center contains a great number of entrepreneurs, with residents
who would like the opportunity to work where they live and with others who are passionate about making
the City a great place to build and grow a business. Much of the City’s identified Business Mixed-Use (B-
MU) land use designation is comprised of older stock light industrial type buildings constructed between
the 1960s and 1970s that may not initially generate the interest of today’s typical industrial user, who
requires higher clear heights, more square footage, and larger truck courts. While this may be viewed as
a disadvantage to the City with respect to its overall economic competitiveness, it also presents an
opportunity to re-envision and perhaps redevelop.
Unlike the broader region, in which the population continues to age rapidly, Brooklyn Center’s population
grew younger between 2000 and 2010, due to an increase in the number of persons aged 25 to 34.
Although the 2040 Comprehensive Plan noted a median age of residents as 32.8 (2016), the 2020 census
identified a median age of 32.4 in Brooklyn Center. Increases in the number of young families ultimately
place demands on schools, housing affordability, and the types of retail goods and services needed.
The American Community Survey (2018-2022) data on record identifies an employment rate of 68.6% for
residents of Brooklyn Center as opposed to a Minnesota-wide employment rate of 65.7%. Of those
civilians employed and aged 16 or older: 23.3% worked in educational services, health care, and social
assistance; 18.4% worked in manufacturing; and 11.6% worked in professional, scientific, and
management, administrative, and waste management services. The average commute of a Brooklyn
Center resident is 23.3 minutes, which is just slightly longer than the average commute of a Minnesota
worker. The 2040 Plan notes more than four (4) times as many residents work in Minneapolis than
Brooklyn Center. This is an important consideration in identifying the potential to capitalize on more local
residents returning to the City for work and accessing our younger labor pool and offering a greater work-
life balance by allowing more residents to live and work in Brooklyn Center.
While many residents and policy-makers may have historically pointed to “retail” as a prevalent industry
and job provider in the City of Brooklyn Center, the “production, distribution, and repair” (PDR) industry
sector provides the most employment opportunities in the community, and accounts for over 3,100 jobs
in the City. The 2040 Plan notes that this is an important industry to maintain in the community now and
into the future, and that the Future Land Use Plan specifically identifies, supports, and plans for land uses
that will continue to promote and maintain light industrial and manufacturing, and other similar
businesses.
The PDR industry in Brooklyn Center is trailed slightly by the “Educational and Medical Services”
(Eds/Meds) industry, which has been booming across the Twin Cities region. This is presented in the more
recent investments made by Medtronic, who employs over 1,200 people in Brooklyn Center. Their
property has occupied nearly 19 acres of land under the B-MU land use designation since the early 1970s
and recently went through expansions at each of its buildings in 2018 (dry room addition) and 2019 (chiller
plant addition). Their facilities at 6700 and 6800 Shingle Creek Parkway have since been re-
branded as Medtronic’s Energy and Component Center (MECC), and as they forward their vision as
a med-tech campus.
App. No. 2024-011
PC 09/12/2024
Page 7
Unified Development Ordinance | Mixed-Use (MX-B) Zoning District
MX-B Uses
Adoption of the City’s Unified Development Ordinance in January 2023 resulted in the retirement of the
City’s long-standing I1 (Industrial Park) District, and it was, for the most part, replaced with the City’s
Business Mixed-Use District. This new zoning district reflects the 2040 Comprehensive Plan in that the
purpose of the MX-B District is to, “accommodate land for a mix of business and light industrial uses, with
allowances for supporting retail/service uses. This designation encourages redevelopment or
development of commercial, office, general business, and light industrial uses in coordination with
supportive retail/commercial uses towards encouraging a more dynamic and connected experience for
workers.”
While the district’s predecessor, the I1 District, was very much a typical business park/light industrial
district, in that the uses were limited to manufacturing activities, wholesale trade activities, service
activities (e.g. veterinarian and animal hospitals, kennels, laundering, dry cleaning, and dyeing, and
contract construction), public transportation terminals, foundries, and textile mills, with retail permitted
via special use as an accessory use only, the new MX-B District strives to provide a wider range of uses to
the benefit of employers and employees in the area, while still maintaining its origins as a light industrial
district.
Section 35-4103 of the Unified Development Ordinance outlines “manufacturing, assembly, and
processing of products, “wholesale trade,” “foundries,” and “textile mills and mills products” as uses only
allowed or permitted by conditional use in the City’s MX-B and I Districts. The new MX-B District does
grant new flexibilities in use by allowing for non-residential educational uses like business and trade
schools (but excluding public and private elementary and secondary schools), medical and health uses,
brewpubs, micro-wineries and distilleries, restaurants, grocery stores, indoor recreational fitness (but not
amusement centers), and hospitality lodging; however, these uses function differently than a place for
religious assembly might in that they are oftentimes centered around service times, and oftentimes
operate outside of typical business hours (e.g. Monday through Friday, 8 to 5 p.m.), although the below
example provides mid-day services on Fridays.
Potential Impacts and Other Considerations
Places for Religious Assembly are currently permitted as a conditional use within the City’s R1 (Low Density
Residential), which comprises the greatest amount of land in the City, R2 (Medium Low Density
Residential), C (Commercial), and I (Industrial) zoning districts. The majority of existing religious assembly
uses are predominately located within the City’s R1 District. There is only one religious assembly use
located in the City’s I (General Industry) District, and in what was formerly a veterinary hospital turned
mosque at 4900 France Avenue North. Prior to this request, all places for religious assembly were required
primary vehicular access to be located on a collector or arterial street. This was, in part, a means to
manage traffic volumes on City streets as people arrive and leave prior to and following a service.
The aforementioned place for assembly use at 4900 France Avenue North, which City staff sees as the
closest example given its location in the City’s heavier industrial I District, is located on a dead-end cul-de-
sac and, although a parking and traffic study was provided as part of their special use application, with
plans to operate a shuttle given limited on-site parking, their conditions of approval are not being met
and City staff has noted on-street parking during service times, which constrains emergency vehicle access
to the property’s sole access, access to neighboring industrial businesses and residential homes, as well
as parking occurring off-site at the Xcel Transformer Station. As its location is not served by sidewalks, this
App. No. 2024-011
PC 09/12/2024
Page 8
also forces members to walk in the City streets or across private properties (refer to Image 1 below):
Image 1. On-street parking at Location of Place for Religious Assembly in I (General Industry) District.
Assembly uses, such as religious institutions, tend to have higher parking demands than other types of
uses due to the nature of their visitors. Industrial uses by contrast tend to have low parking demands
relative to their square footage because these uses generally have lower employment densities, although
the 2040 Comprehensive Plan seeks to add employment intensity to the B-MU land use designation.
For example, places of public assembly, such as houses of worship (e.g. churches, mosques), theatres,
auditoriums (other than school auditoriums), mortuaries, stadiums, arenas, and dance halls require one
parking space for every three seats, or attendees, per Section 35-5506 (Required Parking Spaces) under
the City’s Unified Development Ordinance. Conversely, industry and wholesale uses, as are more typically
found in the City’s MX-B District, require one space for every two employees based upon maximum
planned employment during any work period or one space for each 800 square feet of gross floor area,
whichever requirement is greater. In the event the latter requirement is greater, adequate land area shall
be provided for the required off-street parking area, but improved space need only be provided according
to the employees’ ratio.
In reviewing the City’s existing MX-B District properties, it was noted that the majority of properties (in
terms of building square footage) are home to uses traditionally found in a business park/light industrial
district. These include: Medtronic, Endurable Building Products (aluminum deck systems), Hiawatha
Rubber, Reviva (remanufactured diesel engines/components), RAO Manufacturing (supplier of deep draw
formings, metal stampings, sheet metal fabrication, etc.), the former Metro Transit Reuter Bus Garage,
and the City’s Public Works Garage. The majority of these properties are located on minor roadways that
are intended to provide access for employees, trucking, and logistics, with loading docks, gated access, or
outside storage present. Although there are some properties that do not fit this description (e.g. multi-
tenant buildings off Earle Brown Drive, hotels and former Earle Brown Lanes bowling alley, which is
currently being converted to a Los Campeones Gym off James Circle North), these are the existing
conditions for many of the 36 properties within the MX-B District.
App. No. 2024-011
PC 09/12/2024
Page 9
App. No. 2024-011
PC 09/12/2024
Page 10
Image 2. Existing Parking Conditions at Different MX-B District Properties.
Image 3. Example Conditions of Road Access within MX-B District.
There are certain barriers that would also require consideration in retrofitting industrial or office type
buildings or tenant spaces for “assembly” type uses as they require higher fire suppression standards than
other types of uses due to the congregation of people that occurs within buildings and the potential need
for exiting in case of an emergency. Conversion of a standalone building or tenant space would likely
constitute a change of use from the perspective of Building and Fire Code, and thus would trigger a change
of use from the perspective of the Building and Fire Code.
In the case of the few multi-tenant office buildings located off Earle Brown Drive and within the MX-B
District, their building type could restrict the location of a proposed place for religious assembly type use.
For example, on a 2B construction type building, an assembly use could not be located higher than the
third (3rd) floor.
In reviewing the standards for approving an ordinance amendment, the proposed amendment shall be
consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use classifications; whether the proposal
demonstrates merit beyond the interests of an owner or, in this case, interested party, for an individual
parcel; and the specific policies and recommendations as outlined within the City’s Comprehensive Plan
or other City plans.
Although this is not contemplated within this application, any applicant pursuing a conditional use permit
(CUP) for a “Places for Religious Assembly” use would further need to satisfactorily demonstrate that all
conditional use permit criteria as outlined under Section 35-7703 (Conditional Use Permit Criteria) has
App. No. 2024-011
PC 09/12/2024
Page 11
been meet. These criteria include, but are not limited to whether: the establishment of the conditional
use will impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses
permitted in the district; that adequate measures have been or will be taken so as to provide
ingress, egress, and parking so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets; be in
accordance with the general objectives, or with any specific objective, of the City’s Comprehensive Plan
and Unified Development Ordinance; and not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other
property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and
impair property values within the neighborhood.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above-noted findings, and in response to Section 35-71304 (Amendment Criteria) of the City
Code, City staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council denial of Planning
Commission Application No. 2024-011, which would amend Section 35-4103 (Allowed Use Table) of the
City Code of Ordinances regarding places for religious assembly as a conditional use within the City of
Brooklyn Center’s Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) zoning district.
If City Council were to grant an approval of the above-requested amendment to Chapter 35 (Unified
Development Ordinance), it would require any applicant, including the Applicant for Planning Commission
Application No. 2024-011, to submit a separate application for review and consideration of a conditional
use permit (CUP).
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A – Planning Commission Application No. 2024-011 plans and documents, submitted August
13, 2024.
Exhibit B – Public Hearing Notice, submitted for publication in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post, and dated
August 29, 2024
Exhibit C – Council/EDA Work Session Memo for Concept Review of 6010 Earle Brown Drive and
Discussion on Potential Changes to MX-B District to Allow for Places of Religious
Assembly with Select Exhibits, dated August 28, 2023.
Exhibit D – Map of City MX-B District Properties and Table of Property Information.
a.Whether there is a clear and public need or benefit;
Trinity International Fellowship stands as a beacon of light, radiating passion and purpose. Its
teachings encompass all aspects of life, empowering believers to apply the principles of the Gospel
and e ect societal change. With a deep-rooted desire to witness transformation and impact, the
ministry equips its members with the necessary tools to delve into the Word of God, fostering
profound understanding.
Trinity International conducts community outreach such as food assistance programs (at no-cost),
counseling, and youth programing, with the intent to support the community of Brooklyn Center at
large.
b. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent and compatible with surrounding land
use classifications.
While not a Permitted Use, Places for Religious Assembly provide community care, guidance and
connectivity. Trinity International Fellowship believes this support should not be limited to specific
areas in the community.
c. Whether all permitted uses in the proposed zoning district can be contemplated for
development of the subject property;
The proposed amendment is less restrictive. Therefore, all existing permitted uses in the proposed
zoning district will remain eligible on the subject property.
d. Whether there have been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area
since the subject property was zoned;
Planning for the project started in 2021. Since then, there has been a substantial zoning
classification change when the City of Brooklyn Center updated its Comprehensive Plan. Under the
previous city code, Places for Religious Assembly were permitted uses on this site.
f. Whether the subject property will bear fully the UDO development restrictions for the
proposed zoning districts;
If the Text Amendment is accepted by the City of Brooklyn Center, the subject property will be in full
compliance.
g. Whether the subject property is generally unsuited for uses permitted in the present
zoning district, with respect to size, configuration, topography or location;
While this property could be developed for permitted uses, per the UDO, Places for Religious
Assembly are not Permitted Uses in any zoning district and are only permitted as Conditional Uses
in R1, R2, C, and I Zoning Districts. Trinity International believes the City of Brooklyn would benefit
from allowing Places for Religious Assembly to be located amongst a diverse group of sites.
h. Whether the rezoning will result in the expansion of a zoning district, warranted by:
1) Comprehensive Planning;
2) The lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district; or
3) The best interests of the community.
Places for Religious Assembly provide spiritual guidance and support for the community. Trinity
International conducts outreach programs such as food assistance programs, counseling, youth
Exhibit A
programs with the intent to support anyone in the larger community regardless of religious belief.
Thus, the rezoning will result in strengthening support for the community.
i. Whether the proposal demonstrates merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of
an individual parcel.
Trinity International Fellowship plans to invest millions of dollars in constructing a facility that has a
Sanctuary for services, gathering and meeting spaces for community use, spaces for youth ministry,
a food shelf to assist those in need, and o ices for ministry sta and community outreach. With
this, With the goal of aiding the poor, assisting the homeless, and promoting community
development, Trinity International Fellowship aims to be a pillar in the community for many years to
come.
k. The purpose and intent of this UDO, or in the case of a map amendment, whether it meets
the purpose and intent of the individual district; and
While not a Permitted Use, a Place for Religious Assembly will provide support to the neighboring
sites such as the residential district and hospital.
l. If applicable, the adequacy of a bu-er or transition provided between potentially
incompatible districts.
The proposed Amendment should not produce any incompatible districts.
From: Holly Burley <holly@vanmanab.com>
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2024 9:46 AM
To: Krystin Eldridge
Cc: Ginny McIntosh
Subject: RE: Trinity International - 6010 Earle Brown Additional Documents
Hi Ginny and Krystin,
A – Clear and Public need or benefit –
Beyond the benefits of fostering a religious community, Trinity International seeks to support the
Brooklyn Center community as a whole. We hear a lot about our communities facing significant
challenges such as food insecurity, mental health issues, and a lack of opportunities for youth. These
challenges disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, including low-income families, individuals
with disabilities, and the elderly. According to Metcouncil, Brooklyn Center has a higher unemployment
rate than the Hennepin County average with those numbers on the rise. Metcouncil has also defined
Brooklyn Center as an area of concentrated poverty with over 50% are residents of color and having
significant income inequality in the past 10 years of reporting. Based on these data backed needs of the
public, Trinity International seeks to utilize their already established ministries of food assistance
programs, counseling, and youth programming as well as establish new ministries based on specific
needs and feedback of the Brooklyn Center community to help meet that need.
B – Whether the proposed amendment is consistent and compatible with surrounding land use
classifications
The proposed amendment for the building location is within the MX-B district and adjacent to
PUDMIXED, C, R1, R3, R5. While Places of Religious Assembly is not a permitted use in any of the zoning
districts, it is a conditional use in all surrounding zones. In addition, many of the uses in the proposed
Trinity International building align with MX-B permitted, conditional, or accessory uses. The building
would have features of permitted uses including non-commercial recreation, as well as food bank
related services that may be similar to grocery establishments. Conditional uses for MX-B that would be
similar include library and indoor recreation uses – especially for children and youth. Allowable
accessory uses of eating establishment, and banquet and conference spaces would also be accessory
uses within Trinity International with potlucks, community gatherings, and space for special event
including weddings, funerals, and similar services.
Thank you,
Holly
Holly Burley
Senior Architect, Vanman Architects and Builders
P 763.541.9552 | M 507.621.2192 | E holly@vanmanab.com
W vanmanab.com | A 6701 W 23rd St, Minneapolis, MN 55426
From: Krystin Eldridge <keldridge@brooklyncentermn.gov>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 12:34 PM
To: Holly Burley <holly@vanmanab.com>
Cc: Ginny McIntosh <gmcintosh@brooklyncentermn.gov>
Subject: RE: Trinity International - 6010 Earle Brown Additional Documents
Hi Holly,
I am unsure how familiar you are with the project. We were looking through your submitted materials
for Planning Commission Meeting on September 12. For rezoning questions in particular (attached), we
are looking at a broader impact for the City and the Business Mixed Use districts. Can you expound on
how this use benefits the MX-B district, specifically A and B of the statement.
All the light purple areas are MXB. Let me or Ginny know if you need something else to help you with
these questions. Maybe you can add some examples of how it worked for other proposals?
I will not be in next week, but Ginny can help answer any questions you have.
Thank you,
Krystin Eldridge | Associate Planner
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-219
Direct: 763.569.3316 | General: 763.569.3330
General Email: communitydevelopment@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us
www.brooklyncentermn.gov | keldridge@brooklyncentermn.gov
From: Julian Akogyeram <julian@vanmanab.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2024 2:02 PM
To: Krystin Eldridge keldridge@brooklyncentermn.gov
Cc: Ginny McIntosh <gmcintosh@brooklyncentermn.gov>
Subject: Re: Trinity International - 6010 Earle Brown Additional Documents
Krystin,
Any updates on the process?
Thanks,
Julian
From: Julian Akogyeram
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2024 4:12 PM
To: keldridge@brooklyncentermn.gov <keldridge@brooklyncentermn.gov>
Cc: Ginny McIntosh <gmcintosh@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us>
Subject: Trinity International - 6010 Earle Brown Additional Documents
Krystin,
Please see the attached.
The document called “Rezoning Statement” has the answers to the questions we discussed earlier. I’ve
also attached the Site and Grading Plans. The Plans and Elevations are too large to add to this email, so
I’ll send those separately.
Please let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks,
This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. Click here to report this
email as spam.
Exhibit B
Council/EDA Work Session
DATE: 8/28/2023
TO: City Council
FROM: Dr. Reggie Edwards, City Manager
THROUGH: Jesse Anderson, Community Development Director
BY: Ginny McIntosh, City Planner and Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT: Concept Review for 6010 Earle Brown Drive and Discussion on Poten3al Changes to MX-B
District to Allow for Places of Religious Assembly.
Requested Council Acon:
- Consider a concept proposal for 6010 Earle Brown Drive, which would ul mately require an ordinance
amendment to the MX-B (Business Mixed-Use) District to allow for places of religious assembly, and
provide feedback.
Background:
Trinity Interna3onal Fellowship, a non-denomina3onal ministry based out of Liberia, has expressed interest
in purchasing 6010 Earle Brown Drive, which has long been home to MinMor Industries. The Subject
Property was originally approved for use as a bank and drive-thru in 1988, but was purchased by Minmor
LLC in 2008. The Subject Property has been marketed on and off for sale or lease for a few years now.
City staff and the architect working with Trinity Interna3onal Fellowship held numerous conversa3ons
surrounding the intended use of the Subject Property and poten3al impacts to the overarching MX-B
District. City staff outlined numerous concerns and considera3ons as part of these discussions. As City staff
determined there was no path forward for the use at the Subject Property under current City Code
provisions, the architect, in conversa3on with Trinity Interna3onal Fellowship, requested City Council weigh
in on the proposal in the form of a concept review work session.
Concept Review for 6010 Earle Brown Drive
The concept review process is an opportunity for the City Council to review a development concept prior to
a formal proposal from an applicant, and provide comments, ask ques3ons, and indicate whether or not the
City would generally be open to the project. Concept reviews also provide insight to City staff and the
applicant as to the City Council’s level of interest, and any specific concerns related to a project.
A concept review is considered advisory and is non-binding to the City and the applicant. No formal ac3on
can be taken at a work session, and the Council is not being asked to vote on the proposal. If the applicant
chooses to submit a formal applica3on to the City to proceed, it would be subject to the full City review
process, as with any other applica3on.
The Subject Property located at 6010 Earle Brown Drive was originally approved under Planning
Commission Applica3on No. 88019 as an approximately 20,000-square foot City-County Federal Credit
Union loca3on and drive-thru. At the 3me of approval, the Subject Property was zoned C2 (Commerce)
District—“financial ins3tu3ons” and “office buildings” were considered permiHed uses within this District.
Exhibit C
The staff report on file contemplated the parking requirements under this applica3on assuming a mix of
retail and office use for a total of 118 on-site parking spaces.
In 2008, MinMor Industries purchased the Subject Property. MinMor Industries provides print, design,
and manufacturing services and primarily works in the prin3ng, packaging, and promo3ons industries under
its numerous companies (i.e. Mello Smello, OlymPak, Kidcen3ves, Mission Nutri3on, and Safety Stop).
Given MinMor’s reduced office presence at this loca3on, the Subject Property has been for sale or lease off
and on for a few years now.
Trinity Interna3onal Fellowship provided a narra3ve (aHached), which notes an exis3ng membership of
between 180 to 250 members since opening their local chapter in 2018. The narra3ve further indicates
plans to purchase the Subject Property for use as a, “sanctuary for services, gathering and mee3ng spaces,
spaces for youth ministry, a food shelf to assist those in need, and offices for ministry staff and community
outreach.” Although there were conversa3ons about providing on-site daycare, no formal request was
outlined in the narra3ve. Further discussions with City staff outline plans to expand the exis3ng building
towards Highway 100 to allow for future membership growth. A mul3-phase expansion plan is included
with the memo as reference and further breaks down the poten3al usage of the building.
City staff reviewed the narra3ve and provided plans, which would accommodate an approximately 1,200
square foot sanctuary, bookstore, food shelf, office space, and group mee3ng rooms as part of an ini3al
Phase I remodel. As noted, the Subject Property was approved in 1988 with 118 on-site parking spaces.
Assuming an assembly use (1 parking space for every 3 seats/persons), the Subject Property would only
accommodate an addi3onal growth of likely less than 100 new members before minimum parking needs
would no longer be met on-site.
Assuming an exis3ng membership of 250, a minimum of 84 parking spaces would be required—this does
not account for parking needs for church staff (e.g. bookstore, office spaces, food shelf), other visitors, and
those receiving poten3al services. The total building occupant load outlined for the exis ng building today is
noted as 426 occupants. If City staff calculated parking needs purely off occupant load and assumed 100%
assembly use (which is not the case), a minimum of 142 on-site parking spaces would be required to serve
the exis3ng building, which is 24 more parking spaces than are currently available.
The proposed full Phase II expansion as presented would more than double the building occupancy load
from 426 occupants to 928 occupants. Again, if City staff calculated off building occupant load and assumed
100% assembly use (again, which is not the case), a minimum of 310 on-site parking spaces would be
required if the building were expanded. The submiHed Phase II expansion plans again contemplate a
dedicated food shelf, book store, pastoral offices, group mee3ng rooms, a further expanded approximately
5,300-square foot sanctuary with stage, classrooms, and a basement dedicated for a children’s play area,
nursery, and classrooms (e.g. young children, pre-school, toddlers).
These parking concerns were relayed by City staff who noted constraints to the future use of the property
as envisioned. City staff further inquired on the Northern States Power (NSP) powerline that appears to run
along the Subject Property and noted that any proposed plans to expand would require addi3onal review
depending on the width of the easement and any restric3ons. Although there are two exis3ng curb cut
access points off Earle Brown Drive, City staff addressed concerns surrounding ingress and egress as the
Subject Property is located off the intersec3on of Earle Brown Drive and Summit Drive (4-way stop) and it is
assumed all traffic would be concentrated at this intersec3on given Earle Brown Drive is a loop road.
Amendments to MX-B (Business Mixed-Use) District | Other Considera&ons
“Places for Religious Assembly” are permiHed through approval of a Condi3onal Use Permit (CUP) in the
City’s R1 (Low Density Residen3al), R2 (Medium Low Density Residen3al), C (Commerce—Service/Office),
and I (General Industry) Districts. The majority of exis3ng religious assembly uses are predominantly
located within the City’s R1 Districts. Only one religious assembly use is located within the I District.
City staff reviewed the City’s Unified Development Ordinance (Chapter 35) and the only perceived path
forward for Trinity Interna3onal Fellowship to purchase the Subject Property and occupy the space for
religious assembly would be for the City Council to amend the Unified Development Ordinance to allow for
“places for religious assembly,” as it is currently prohibited as a use in the MX-B District. In keeping with the
other districts, City staff assumes the path would be via approval of a Condi3onal Use Permit.
City staff reviewed other poten3al op3ons, such as re-zoning the Subject Property; however, the property is
en3rely surrounded by other MX-B District-zoned proper3es. The MX-C (Commercial Mixed-Use) District is
located to the south of the Subject Property, off Summit Drive; however, this District also prohibits “places
for religious assembly” as a use. The only other alternately zoned proper3es are located across Earle Brown
Drive (i.e. Lux Apartments, Ecumen Memory Care); however, these proper3es are zoned PUD/Mixed
(Planned Unit Development/Mixed Use) District and were specifically approved for mul3-family/senior
housing uses. “Spot zoning” a property is generally prohibited.
The majority of the City’s MX-B District is located just north of Interstates 94/694 and off the intersec3on of
Shingle Creek Parkway and Freeway Boulevard, although there are also MX-B zoned proper3es off Earle
Brown Drive. City staff counted a total of 38 proper3es across the City that are zoned with the MX-B District
designa3on. Although some proper3es feature mul3-tenant type buildings, other proper3es have
standalone buildings. Many of the MX-B proper3es appear to be located off either loop roads (e.g. Earle
Brown Drive, James Circle North), or cul-de-sacs (67th Avenue North).
The MX-B District’s purpose, as outlined in the City’s Unified Development Ordinance, is to, “accommodate
land for a mix of business and light industrial uses, with allowances for suppor3ng retail/service uses. This
designa3on encourages redevelopment or development of commercial, office, general business, and light
industrial uses in coordina3on with suppor3ve retail/commercial uses towards encouraging a more dynamic
and connected experience for workers. This land does not plan for residen3al uses, but may include limited
live-work opportuni3es as established through suppor3ng official controls.”
PermiHed uses within the MX-B District include uses like: medical and health uses, animal hospitals,
commercial animal establishments, brewpubs, micro-wineries, and micro-dis3lleries, office uses, automobile
and truck repair and service sta3ons, manufacturing, assembly, and processing of products, ar3san
produc3on and sales, wholesale trade, and business/trade/post-secondary schools, but not public and
private elementary and secondary schools.
Assembly uses, such as places of religious assembly, tend to have higher parking demands than other types
of uses, such as industrial, which typically have lower parking demands rela3ve to the overall square
footage of building, due in part to lower employment densi3es. For example, “places of religious assembly,”
and other assembly type uses (e.g. theatres, stadiums, arenas, and dance halls) require, “1 parking space for
every three seats/persons.” Industry and wholesales uses require a minimum of one (1) space for every two
(2) employees based on maximum shiO or one (1) space for every 800 square feet of gross floor area.
Medical and dental clinics, which are permiHed in the MX-B District, require a minimum of three (3) spaces
for each doctor or den3st, plus one (1) space for every two (2) employees or one space for each 150 square
feet of gross floor area. Office buildings require a minimum of three (3) parking spaces for every 1,000
square feet of gross floor area.
Depending on the exis3ng use, the conversion of a building could also trigger a “change of use” under the
Building Code, which requires addi3onal considera3ons, including but not limited to: installa3on of panic
hardware, fire separa3on/protec3on measures, or installa3on of an elevator/liO (dependent on
occupancies).
Policy Considera&ons
The City Council is being asked to consider a concept proposal for 6010 Earle Brown Drive, which would
ul3mately require an amendment to the MX-B (Business Mixed-Use) District to allow for “places for
religious assembly,” which is currently prohibited within this District.
Issues for the City Council to consider:
Are there aspects of the site layout, architecture, or form of the presented site plan for 6010 Earle
Brown Drive (Subject Property) that are concerning to the Council?
Is the development plan in keeping with the City's 2040 future land use plan and long-range vision for
the area?
Approximately 5.02% of the City of Brooklyn Center has a 2040 future land use designa3on of
“Business Mixed-Use.” This does not include approximately 15 acres of land located at 1297
Shingle Creek Crossing (Former Sears property) that was recommended last year for a
recommended comprehensive plan amendment re-designa3on to Business Mixed-Use, which
would bring the total acreage under this designa3on to approximately 5.3%.
Does the proposed amendment to the MX-B (Business Mixed-Use) District forward the City's
strategic priori3es?
The City’s priority of “Resident Economic Stability” notes that the, “economic stability of
residents is essen3al to vibrant neighborhoods and to retail, restaurant, and business growth.
We will lead by suppor3ng collabora3ve efforts of educa3on, business, and government
sectors to improve income opportuni3es for residents.” Further, the City’s values statement of
“Opera3onal Excellence,” notes that the City will, “commit ourselves to deliver quality services
in a cost effec3ve and efficient manner. We will be good stewards of the limited resources made
available to use by the ci3zens we serve.”
Certain classes of property are considered “exempt” and are therefore not subject to
property taxes. These typically include, but are not limited to: religious uses (e.g.
churches/houses of worship), certain ins3tu3ons of public charity (e.g. 501(c)(3)
organiza3ons), schools (e.g. public, charter schools), cemeteries/burial grounds, and
property used for public purposes (e.g. City Hall, Fire Sta3on). It is important to note
that while a property may become “tax exempt,” the burden does not disappear—rather,
it is shiOed to other tax payers within the City.
Although there are other factors to consider and the poten3al impacts unknown at this
3me, in reviewing the City’s MX-B proper3es, it was determined that the majority of MX-
B District proper3es appear to be classified for tax rate purposes as “Industrial
Preferred” or “Commercial Preferred,” which tax at a higher rate than other property
types. Dependent on interest, there could be implica3ons to the overall tax base that
would need to be accounted for in future City budget years.
Budget Issues:
None to consider at this 3me; however, as noted above, there may be future implica3ons to the overall tax
base in the future.
Anracist/Equity Policy Effect:
Strategic Priories and Values:
Resident Economic Stability, Opera3onal Excellence
ATTACHMENTS:
Descrip3on Upload Date Type
City of Brooklyn Center Zoning Map - MX-B District 8/22/2023 Backup Material
Narra3ve_Trinity Interna3onal Fellowship 8/22/2023 Backup Material
Site Floor Plans_6010 Earle Brown Drive 8/22/2023 Backup Material
presenta3on 8/28/2023 Presenta3on
N
o
b
l
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
B ro okdale D r i v e North
Schilling Park
I nterstate 9 4
U
n
i
t
y
Av
e
n
u
e
Nor
t
h
U
n
i
t
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
How e La ne
65th Avenue North 65t h A venue N orth
73rd Avenue Nor th
69 th A ve nu e N orth
B
r
o
o
kl
y
n
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Mac Park
Crystal Airport
864 ft
100
9
44t h Av enue N orth
C
o
u
n
t
y
R
o
a
d
8
1
W
e
l
come
A
v
e
n
ue
N
o
rt
h
O
r
c
h
a
r
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
P
e
r
r
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
Q
u
a
i
l
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
R
e
g
e
n
t
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
N
e
w
t
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
H
u
m
b
o
l
d
t
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
Brookdale
Dr
ive
North
Palmer Lake
Environmental
Area
Brookdale Park
850 ft
873 ft
PalmerLake
10
100
94
73rd Avenue No rth
F
r
a
n
c
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
F
r
e
m
ont
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
60t h
A
v
enue North
X
e
r
x
e
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
or
t
h
N
e
w
t
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
rt
h
B
e
a
r
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
P
a
l
merLak
eDr
i
v
eW
e
s
t
5 9 t h
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
orth
61st Avenue N o r t h
Freew
ay Bo u l e v a r d
6 6 t h A v enue North
H
u
m
b
o
l
d
t
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
69 th Avenue No rt h
Summi
t
D
r
i
ve
58th
A
v
e
n u e
N
o
r
t h
County
R
o
ad 10
B
r
o
o
k
l
y
n
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
57th Avenue No rt h
Brooklyn
Center
860 ft
TwinLake
100
152
43 r d
A
v
e
nue No rth
55th A v enu e
N
o
r t h
X
e
r
x
e
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
rt
h
R
u
s
s
e
l
l
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
4 0 t h A v enue N o rth
Fr
a
nce
Av
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
Z
e
n
i
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
51 s t A venue N o rth
4 9th A v e nue N or th
45 th Av enue N ort h
46th
A
v enue N orth
G
i
ra
r
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
th
Y
o
r
k
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
F
r
e
m
o
n
t
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
rth
A
b
b
o
t
t
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
V
i
n
c
e
n
t
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
Hu
m
b
o
l
d
t
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
C
o
u
n
ty
R
o
a
d
8
1
P
e
n
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
44 th A ven u e N o r thLakeDrive
H
u
m
b
o
l
d
t
Ave
nu
e
No
r
t
h
B
r
o
o
k
l
y
n
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Crystal Lake
Cemetery
Centerbrook
Golf Course
Shingle Creek
Crossing
Shingle Creek
Park
Victory
Memorial
Parkway
Thomas
Hollingsworth
Park
Robbinsdale
CrystalLake
81
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
V
i
n
c
e
n
t
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
R
u
s
s
e
l
l
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
39th Ave nue North
U
pt
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
rt
h
J
a
m
e
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
Q
u
e
e
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
G
i
r
a
r
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
I
r
v
i
n
g
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
W
a
s
hb
u
r
n
A
v
en
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
K
n
o
x
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
or
t
h
M
a
j
o
r
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
th
L
o
g
a
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
Hum
b
o
l
dt
A
v
e
nu
e
N
o
r
t
h
G
r
i
m
es
A
v
enu
e
N
o
rt
h
N
o
b
l
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
J
une
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
Lakeview
Terrace Park
Brookdale D rive Nort h M
i
s
s
i
s
s
i
ppi
La
n
e
N
o
r
t
h
Mis
s
i
s
s
i
ppi
R
i
v
e
r
252
94
73rd A ve n ue N ort h
Da
l
l
a
s
R
o
a
d
B
r
y
a
n
t
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
Br
y
a
nt
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
D
u
p
o
n
t
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
E
m
e
r
s
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
Wes
t
R
i
v
e
r
R
o
a
d
57 th A v enue
N
ort h
C
a
m
d
e
n
A
v
e
nu
e
N
o
r
t
h
E astRiv
er
R
oa
d
N
orthea
s
t
Mi
s
si
s
s
i
p
p
i
Rive
r
Mi
s
si
ss
ipp
i
R
i
ver
D
u
p
o
n
t
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
E
m
e
rs
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
B
r
y
a
n
t
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
6
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
o
rt
h
A
l
d
r
i
c
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
C
o
l
f
a
x
A
v
en
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
C
o
l
f
a
x
Av
en
u
e
N
or
t
h
Ly
n
d
al
e
A
ve
nu
eNo
r
th
42 nd Av e nue N o r th
Webber Park
St Anthony
Parkway
Anoka Co
Riverfront
Regional Park
A
l
d
r
i
c
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
C
o
l
f
a
x
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
B
r
y
a
n
t
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
39 th Ave nue
N
o rth
Dowling Avenue North
ROBBINSDALE
CRYSTAL
FRIDLEY
BROOKLYN PARK
MINNEAPOLIS
%&'(694
%&'(94
%&'(94
GVWX130
GVWX8
GVWX1
GVWX57
GVWX9
GVWX10
GVWX81
GVWX152
?@A@252
?@A@100
?@A@100
Ma
p
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
:
\
\
a
r
c
s
e
r
v
e
r
1
\
G
I
S
\
B
R
C
N
\
_
B
a
s
e
m
a
p
\
E
S
R
I
\
P
r
o
\
Z
o
n
i
n
g
\
Z
o
ni
n
g
M
a
p
\
Z
o
n
i
n
g
M
a
p
.
a
p
r
x
|
U
s
e
r
n
a
m
e
:
d
a
v
i
d
s
a
|
D
a
t
e
S
a
v
e
d
:
3
/
1
6
/
2
02
3
4
:
4
4
P
M
Legend
City Boundaries
Shoreland Areas
Mississippi River Corridor Critical
Area (MRCCA) Districts
District Description (District Code)
River Neighborhood District
(CA-RN)
Separated from River District
(CA-SR)
Water
Zoning Districts
R1 : Low Density Residential
R2 : Medium Low Density
Residential
R3 : Medium Density
Residential
R4 : Medium High Density
Residential
R5 : High Density Residential
MX-N1 : Neighborhood Mixed-
Use
MX-N2 : Neighborhood Mixed-
Use
MX-B : Business Mixed Use
I : General Industrial
MX-C : Commercial Mixed-Use
C : Commerce - Service/Office
TOD : Transit Oriented
Development
O : Public Open Space
PUD/C1 : Planned Unit
Development/Commercial 1
PUD/C2 : Planned Unit
Development/Commercial 2
PUD/C1A : Planned Unit
Development/Office-Service
PUD/I1 : Planned Unit
Development/Industrial 1
PUD/R1 : Planned Unit
Development/Residential 1
PUD/R3 : Planned Unit
Development/Residential 3
PUD/MX-C : Planned Unit
Development/Commercial
Mixed-Use
PUD/MX-B : Planned Unit
Development/Business Mixed
Use
PUDMIXED : Planned Unit
Development/Mixed
PUD/TOD : Planned Unit
Development/Transit Oriented
Development
0 1
Miles
Source: MnGeo, Hennepin County
!I
Brooklyn Center Zoning Map
Brooklyn Center, MN
Shoreland and MRCCA Areas
March 2023
Trinity International Fellowship, a non-denominational ministry, has made a remarkable impact
since its establishment in 1999. With its mega central headquarters in Monrovia, Liberia, and
branches spanning across three different nations, the ministry has witnessed continuous growth,
boasting an impressive membership of over 12,000 active individuals. In 2018, a new chapter
began as Trinity International Fellowship planted its roots in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, where
it quickly gained traction and now serves a thriving community of 180 to 250 members.
The ministry's commitment to serving the community is evident as it seeks to expand its reach by
purchasing the property located at 6010 Earle Brown Drive. This campus will consist of a
Sanctuary for services, gathering and meeting spaces, spaces for youth ministry, a food shelf to
assist those in need, and offices for ministry staff and community outreach. With the goal of
aiding the poor, assisting the homeless, and promoting community development, Trinity
International Fellowship aims to make a lasting impact through the teachings of Jesus Christ.
Plans are underway to invest millions of dollars in constructing a facility that aligns with the
architectural vision and gains approval from the city council, further solidifying the ministry's
commitment to their mission.
One of the driving factors behind choosing Brooklyn Center as the ministry's location is its
vibrant diversity. Trinity International Fellowship thrives in the multi-cultural atmosphere,
embracing the richness that comes from various backgrounds and traditions. Since their arrival in
2018, the congregants have been actively involved in fellowship, helping those in need and
distributing food and clothing. Led by the dedicated Senior Pastor, Nyenatee S. Davis, who is not
only a minister but also a doctorate student at the University of Minnesota and a successful
entrepreneur, the ministry's impact extends beyond the Sunday sermons.
Trinity International Fellowship stands as a beacon of light, radiating passion and purpose. Their
teachings encompass all aspects of life, empowering believers to apply the principles of the
Gospel and effect societal change. With a deep-rooted desire to witness transformation and
impact, the ministry equips its members with the necessary tools to delve into the Word of God,
fostering profound understanding. Their success is not measured solely by numbers, but by the
countless souls won through their unwavering dedication. Trinity International Fellowship
humbly acknowledges that all the glory belongs to God alone, as it continues to shine brightly in
its pursuit of sharing the Gospel.
DN
DN
3012 SF
sanctuary
269 SF
storage
250 SF
stair
257 SF
security
360 SF
vest
59 SF
elev249 SF
bookstore
151 SF
stair 'c'
2017 SF
fellowship/reception
220 seats
250 SF
women's
247 SF
men's
305 SF
cafe
410 SF
food shelf
231 SF
mother's
107 SF
nursing
information
desk
coat hooks
mech
patio
trash
enclosure
COPYRIGHT 2022C
TRINITY INTERNATIONAL PHASE 2 -SITE - OPTION 'B'
PID Acres County Address ZIP Property Owner Associated Business | Use
211821110005 3.67 6000 Earle Brown Drive 55430 B R Romine Et Al Trustees Park Nicollet Brookdale Clinic
211821110011 3.05 6010 Earle Brown Drive 55430 MINMOR LLC
Minmor Industries (printing,
design, and manufacturing
services under Mello Smello,
OlymPak, Kidcentives, Mission
Nutrition, and Safety Stop
companies)
211821110002 4.22 6040 Earle Brown Drive 55430 Heccl LLC Multi-tenant office building
3511921110012 8.49 1600 67th Avenue North 55430
Bradley Fam Dynasty Trust Endurable Building Products
(Aluminum deck systems and
products)
3511921110013 3.9 1700 67th Avenue North 55430
Popehn Limited Partnshp Lllp Hiawatha Rubber (Rubber
Assembly/Components)| Reviva
(Remanufactured Diesel
Engines/Components)
3511921120002 9.28 6820 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430
Gki Industrial Mpls Llc Shingle Creek Commerce Center
(Multi-tenant)
3511921120008 5.2 6801 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430
Breit Henn Ind Owner Llc
Lallak's Delivery Services Inc |
C&D Granite & Quartz | North
Star Warehousing and Distribution
3511921140003 6.42 6530 James Avenue North 55430
Rao Manufacturing Co Hldgs Llc
RAO Manufacturing (supplier of
deep draw formings, metal
stampings, sheet metal
fabrications, welded assemblies,
and tank heads for use in air
compressor tanks, cryogenic
tanks, paint sprayers, floor
clearning equipment, small
engines & generators, filter
housings, fireplaces, etc.)
3511921140017 3.14 1600 Freeway Boulevard 55430 Zaina Properties Llc Quality Inn
3511921230001 7.53 2700 Freeway Boulevard 55430
Freeway Blvd Investors Llc
Multi-tenant building (Bizzy
Coffee Headquarters, Revolution
Screen Works, B& R Drapery and
Home Furnishings, Firenet
Systems, Inc.)
3511921420006 2.43 6445 James Circle North 55430 Kaswa Hospitality Inc Super 8
3511921430007 5.53 6300 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430 Tks Brooklyn Center Hldg Llc Multi-tenant building
3511921140005 1.39 6645 James Avenue North 55430 SEWA-AIFW SEWA-AIFW (non-profit)
3511921140006 2.08 6660 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430
Hrrj Properties LLC Interscapes, Inc. (architectural
woodwork), Glass Specialists, and
Global African Foods
3511921410020 8.57 1501 Freeway Boulevard 55430 Ph Minneapolis LLC FBI Regional Headquarters
3511921420010 1.28 1701 James Circle North 55430
CADD/Engr Supply Inc
CES Imaging (printing, scanning)
3511921420011 2.11 6415 James Circle North 55430 SIYA LLC Travelodge
3511921420012 1.01 6405 James Circle North 55430 SRODES LLC Denny's Restaurant
3511921430017 5.8 6160 Summit Drive 55430 Brooklyn Center Summit LLC Multi-tenant office building
3511921440003 6.27 6120 Earle Brown Drive 55430 EARLE BROWN TOWER LLP Multi-tenant office building
3511921140002 1.19 22 Address Unassigned 0 Rao Manufctring Co Hldgs Llc Vacant Lot (parking)
3511921140008 7.33 1800 Freeway Boulevard 55430
St Paul Fire & Marine Ins Co
Geneva Group (Manufacturer of
Hauler Racks and ProRac Systems)
3511921140014 2.46 1601 67th Avenue North 55430
G&J Steffens Ltd Partnership Zip Scanners (police scanners),
Mile Four (Organic chicken feed
and coop essentials), and Sound
Ceilings, Inc. (MN and Dakota's
largest stocking distributor of
Crane Composites and Marlite
FRP)
3511921140016 2.78 1700 Freeway Boulevard 55430
J M Grundtner Fam Rev Trust
Precision Inc. (manufacturer of
custom magnetic components and
assemblies for the electronics
industry), and Climate Makers,
Inc. (Building automation systems
for temperature control)
MX-B District Properties
Exhibit D
3511921410008 4.03 6440 James Circle North 55430
Beans And Juice Llc Los Campeones Gym (under
construction)
3511921410015 1.12 1600 James Circle North 55430 Zaina Properties Llc Quality Inn
211821110010 0.88 6020 Earle Brown Drive 55430 2269 Ford-Fs Ptnrshp Llp Kindercare
3511921120015 18.87 6800 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430 Medtronic Inc Medtronic (North Building)
3511921140007 2.14 6540 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430 6540 Shngle Crk Hld Llc Etal CenturyLink
3511921210002 6.48 6844 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430
City Of Brooklyn Center City of Brooklyn Center Public
Works Garage
3511921210003 8.52 6840 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430
Gki Industrial Mpls Llc
The Academy MN (MMA, Jiu-Jitsu,
Muay Thai), Tiny Footprint Coffee
(World's First Carbon Neutral
Coffee/training classes), and SCP
Distributors (swimming pool
supply)
3511921210004 15.5 6845 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430
Metropolitan Transit Area Former Martin J. Ruter Garage
(being used as office/bus
rodeo/training currently)
3511921240004 4.69 2400 Freeway Boulevard 55430
Bc2400 Llc Abco Auto Parts (recycled auto
part supply)
3511921410014 1.05 1601 Freeway Boulevard 55430 Skc Holdings Llc Jambo Africa
3511921410021 4.93 1601 James Circle North 55430
Economic Development
Authority of the City of Brooklyn
Center
Vacant Lot for Future
Redevelopment (former Olive
Garden and Cracker Barrel)
3511921440002 3.6 22 Address Unassigned 0
City of Brooklyn Center Parking Overflow for Heritage
Center
3511921440013 7.46 6155 Earle Brown Drive 55430 HRA City of Brooklyn Center Heritage Center
69TH AVE N
D
U
P
O
N
T
A
V
E
N
INTE
R
S
T
A
T
E
S
9
4
/
6
9
4
FREEWAY BLVD
59TH AVE N
HIGH
W
A
Y
1
0
0
SHINGLE CREEK PKWY
63RD AVE N
X
E
R
X
E
S
A
V
E
N
B
R
O
O
K
L
Y
N
B
L
V
D
H
U
M
B
O
L
D
T
A
V
E
N
S
U
M
M
I
T
D
R
N
EA
R
L
E
B
R
O
W
N
D
R
JA
M
E
S
A
V
E
N
J
O
H
N
M
A
R
T
I
N
D
R
PARKWAY CIR
FREE
W
A
Y
B
L
V
D
JAMES CIR N
SH
I
N
G
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
P
K
W
Y
65TH AVE N
SHINGLE CREEK
PALMER LAKEPALMER LAKE
SHINGLE CREEK
EBHC POND
Applicant | Property Owner: Trinity International Fellowship | Minmor LLC
Request: Ordinance Amendment
MX-B District Properties
6010 Earle Brown Drive (Applicant Property)
1
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Please take notice that the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center will hold a public
hearing on Thursday, September 12, 2024 at 7:00 p.m. at Brooklyn Center City Hall, located at
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 to hear from the public, discuss, and
make a recommendation upon an ordinance amending Chapter 35 of the City Code to allow places
of religious assembly as a conditional use in the City’s Business Mixed-Use (MX-B) zoning
district. Public hearing materials can be accessed and will be available in advance of the meeting
by visiting the City of Brooklyn Center’s website at: https://www.brooklyncentermn.gov/
Interested persons are welcome to attend the hearing and be heard regarding this matter.
Comments and questions may be forwarded to Ginny McIntosh, Planning Manager, at
gmcintosh@brooklyncentermn.gov or by phone at (763) 569-3319 up until 4:30 pm on the day of
the hearing.
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance.
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 35-4103 ALLOWED USE TABLE OF THE CITY
CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING PLACES OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY IN THE
BUSINESS MIXED-USE ZONING DISTRICT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Article I. Brooklyn Center City Code, Chapter 35, Section 35-4103 Allowed Use Table is amended
by adding the following double-underlined language:
P = PERMITTED USE, C = CONDITIONAL USE, I = INTERIM USE, A = ACCESSORY USE
Residential Commercial/ Mixed
Use
Nonresidential
Use-
Specific
Standards
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
M X-
N1
M X-
N2
M X-
C
TO
D
C
MX
- B
I
O
PUBLIC, INSTITUTIONAL, AND CIVIC USES
COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL FACILITIES
Community Center C C C C C
Funeral and crematory
services
C C
Cemetery C
Libraries and art galleries C C C C C C C C C C C C C
2
Places for religious
assembly
C C C C C
Article II. Severability. Should any section or part of this ordinance be declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision will not affect the validity of the ordinance as
a whole or any part other than the part declared invalid.
Article III. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty
days following its legal publication.
Adopted this ____ day of _____________, 2024.
_______________________________________
April Graves, Mayor
ATTEST: _________________________
Barb Suciu, City Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
(Strikeout indicates matter to be deleted, double-underline indicates new matter.)
9/24/2024
1
City Council Meeting| September 23, 2024
Ginny McIntosh, Planning Manager
Ordinance
Amendment to
Chapter 35
2
Background
•Trinity International Fellowship requests an amendment to Section 35‐4103 (Allowed Use Table)
of the City Code of Ordinance, which would allow for “places for religious assembly” in the
Business Mixed‐Use District by issuance of a conditional use permit.
•Per Section 35‐71301 (Applicability), an amendment of the City’s Unified Development Ordinance
may be initiated by the City Council, Planning Commission, or a City property owner.
•This use is currently permitted as a conditional use in the City’s R1 (Low Density Residential), R2
(Medium Low Density Residential), and C (Commercial) and I (General Industry) zoning districts.
•A public hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on August 29, 2024.
•Mail notifications were sent to 36 property owners and physical addresses within the Business
Mixed‐Use District.
•Public hearing notice was published to the City’s website.
9/24/2024
2
3
Background
•August 2023: City Staff presented a concept review of a proposal to allow for places for religious
assembly in the Business Mixed‐Use (MX‐B) District.
•City staff reviewed the property of interest (6010 Earle Brown Drive) for opportunities to perhaps re‐zone
the property, as this would result in lesser impacts to the greater Business Mixed‐Use (MX‐B) zoning
district; however, ordinance amendment appeared to be only path forward.
•The Applicant has spent the past year fundraising and working on plans for a potential buildout of 6010
Earle Brown Drive.
•If ordinance amendment is approved, the Applicant would still need to enter into a purchase
agreement with the Property Owner and receive separate approval of a conditional use permit
(CUP) for 6010 Earle Brown Drive.
•“Conditional uses” are generally permitted uses so long as certain conditions are met with respect to the
mitigating of potentially negative impacts on neighboring properties for uses already permitted.
4
Request for Ordinance Amendment (Text)
Section 35‐4103 (Allowed Use Table)
9/24/2024
3
5
Request for Ordinance Amendment (Text)
2040 Comprehensive Plan
6
Request for Ordinance Amendment (Text)
2040 Comprehensive Plan
•The City’s Business Mixed‐Use (B‐MU) land use designation is brand new under the City’s 2040
Comprehensive Plan (2019), and includes properties located along Earle Brown Drive, and north
of Interstate 694 off Freeway Boulevard and Shingle Creek Parkway.
9/24/2024
4
7
Request for Ordinance
Amendment (Text)
2040 Comprehensive Plan
•The City is predominantly reserved for low
density residential (e.g. R1 District), and there
are limited opportunities for an new or
expected additional employment opportunities
with exception of certain land use designations.
8
Request for Ordinance Amendment (Text)
Unified Development Ordinance | MX‐B District
•January 2023:the City’s I1 (Industrial Park) District, was retired and it was replaced with the City’s
Business Mixed‐Use (MX‐B) District.
•The previous I1 District was a typical business park/light industrial district, in that the uses were limited
to manufacturing, wholesale trade, and service activities (e.g. veterinarian hospitals, kennels, laundering,
dry cleaning, and contract construction), public transportation terminals, foundries, and textile mills,
with retail permitted via special use as an accessory use only.
•Section 35‐4103 of the Unified Development Ordinance outlines “manufacturing, assembly, and
processing of products, “wholesale trade,” “foundries,” and “textile mills and mills products” as uses only
permitted by conditional use in the City’s MX‐B and I Districts.
•The new MX‐B District strives to provide a wider range of uses to the benefit of employers and
employees in the area, while still maintaining its origins as a light industrial district. Other MX‐Buses
include: medical and health uses; brewpubs; restaurants; and hospitality lodging.
9/24/2024
5
9
Request for Ordinance Amendment (Text)
•Example/Case Study:
•Traffic – minor streets faced with high traffic volumes
•Parking – higher parking demands for assembly type uses, resulting in off‐site parking
•Emergency Vehicle Access – access is constrained with street parked on street
10
Request for Ordinance Amendment (Text)
Unified Development Ordinance | Potential Impacts + Considerations
•Assembly uses, such as religious institutions, tend to have higher parking demands than other types of
uses due to the nature of their visitors. Industrial uses by contrast tend to have low parking demands
relative to their square footage because these uses generally have lower employment densities.
•Example:
Places of Public Assembly (Houses of Worship, Theaters, Auditoriums (other than schools),
Mortuaries, Stadiums, Arenas, and Dance Halls require one (1) parking space for every (3) three
seats or persons
Industry and Wholesale Uses require one (1) space for every two (2) employees on maximum
planned employment per work period or one (1) space for every 800 SF of GFA, whichever is
greater.
•Majority of existing MX‐B District properties are home to traditional business park/light industrial uses.
9/24/2024
6
11
Request for Ordinance Amendment (Text)
Example Parking Conditions at Different MX‐B District Properties
12
Request for Ordinance Amendment (Text)
Example Conditions of Road Access within MX‐B District
9/24/2024
7
13
Request for Ordinance Amendment (Text)
Unified Development Ordinance | Potential Impacts + Considerations
•Certain barriers in retrofitting industrial or office type buildings or tenant spaces for “assembly” type
uses as they require higher fire suppression standards than other types of uses due to congregation of
people and potential needs for exiting during emergency.
•Conversion of spaces may trigger change of use (Building/Fire Code).
•For certain multi‐tenant office buildings in MX‐B District, their building occupancy type could be limiting
factor.Example:2B construction type building does not allow for assembly uses to be located higher
than the 3
rd floor.
14
Request for Ordinance Amendment (Text)
•In reviewing requests for ordinance amendments, certain amendment criteria shall be
considered as outlined under Section 35‐71304 (Amendment Criteria). The Planning
Commission and City Council shall review the necessary submittal requirements, facts,
circumstances of the proposed amendment, and make a recommendation and decision on the
amendment based on, but not limited to, consideration of the following criteria and policies.
•Whether there is a clear and public need or benefit;
•Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use
classifications;
•Whether all permitted uses in the proposed zoning district can be contemplated for development of
the subject property;
9/24/2024
8
15
Request for Ordinance Amendment (Text)
•Whether there have been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area since the
subject property was zoned;
•Whether there is an evident, broad public purpose in the case of City‐initiated rezoning proposals;
•Whether the subject property will bear fully the UDO development restrictions for the proposed
zoning districts;
•Whether the subject property is generally unsuited for uses permitted in the present zoning district,
with respect to size, configuration, topography, or location;
•Whether the rezoning will result in the expansion of a zoning district, warranted by:
•Comprehensive Planning;
•The lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district; or
•The best interests of the community.
16
Request for Ordinance Amendment (Text)
•Whether the proposal demonstrates merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of an
individual parcel.
•The specific policies and recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan and other City plans;
•The purpose and intent of this UDO, or in the case of a map amendment, whether it meets the
purpose and intent of the individual district; and
•If applicable, the adequacy to buffer or transition between potentially incompatible districts.
9/24/2024
9
17
Request for Ordinance Amendment (Text)
•In reviewing the standards for approving an ordinance amendment, the proposed
amendment shall be consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use
classifications; whether the proposal demonstrates merit beyond the interests of an owner
or, in this case, interested party, for an individual parcel; and the specific policies and
recommendations as outlined within the City’s Comprehensive Plan or other City plans.
•Any applicant pursuing a conditional use permit (CUP) for a “Places for Religious Assembly”
use would further need to satisfactorily demonstrate that all conditional use permit criteria
as outlined under Section 35‐7703 (Conditional Use Permit Criteria) has been meet.
18
Summary
•Planning Commission held a public hearing at the September 12, 2024 Planning
Commission meeting – no members of the public were present, nor were any comments
submitted in advance of the meeting.
•Applicant (Trinity International Fellowship) and representation from their architect (Vanman
Architects) were present.
•Commissioners held lengthy discussion on the uses allowed within the MX‐B zoning district,
its intended purpose, and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Business
Mixed Use (B‐MU).Questions/Comments from the Planning Commission, included:
•The Heritage Center was within this district – City staff confirmed it was a non‐conforming
use under the 2040 Plan and UDO and was not a like‐for ‐like comparison.
•Questions on whether event centers would be permitted within the MX‐B District if “Places
for Religious Assembly” are permitted as event centers are oftentimes accessory uses.
9/24/2024
10
19
Summary (Cont.)
Questions/Comments from the Planning Commission :
•“Places for Religious Assembly” might be beneficial to industrial businesses in that they would
likely operate in the off hours in the MX‐B District and that perhaps the City might allow for it
and see what happens.
•Commissioner inquiry on how City staff planned to address apparent violations at 4900 France,
which is only other “Place for Religious Assembly” in an industrial district (I District).
•How likely it was that other properties in the MX‐B District might convert to a “Place for
Religious Assembly.”
•While it cannot be a reason for determination as part of a land use application and PC scope of
duties, there were considerations as to how “Places for Religious Assembly” would strengthen
the City’s tax base and particularly as the 2040 Comprehensive Plan outlines the Business
Mixed‐Use (B‐MU) land use designation as the City’s greatest opportunity to provide
employment intensity (1,303) and be competitive economically as a city.
20
Summary (Cont.)
Questions/Comments from the Planning Commission :
•Concerns regarding potential impacts to existing light industrial businesses here in the City
(e.g. non‐complementary uses, impacts to business operations), our support and protection
of them, and whether introducing this use would be in keeping with providing “highest and
best” uses for a given area of the City.
•Concerns of potential spot zoning to allow for use at property of interest.
•Following close of the public hearing, the Planning Commission elected to recommend (3‐2)
City Council approval of the requested ordinance amendment to Section 35‐4103 (Allowed Use
Table) to allow for Places for Religious Assembly as a conditional use in the MX‐B District.
9/24/2024
11
21
Summary (Cont.)
Sacred Settlements/Communities
•Following the September 12, 2024 Planning Commission meeting, the City Attorney informed
City staff that a bill was passed during the last legislative session (in effect as of January 1, 2024)
regarding “sacred settlements” or “sacred communities.”
•Requires cities to allow religious institutions to permit micro‐unit dwellings on properties owned by
religious institutions as a permitted or conditional use – no matter what zoning district they are
located in.
•Intended to provide additional means for faith communities to serve chronically homeless, designated
volunteers, and extremely low income individuals in accordance with religious vocations.
•Micro‐units cannot exceed 400 SF in size and must be built on permanent chassis and anchored.
•Other minimum build requirements (e.g. access to water/electric via principal building or access to
common kitchen/toilet/bathing/laundry consistent with boarding house requirements under MN Rules,
part 1305.2902).
•City staff does not have enough information to determine whether these micro‐unit dwellings would
be of consideration or feasible on any of the properties within the MX‐B District.
22
Summary (Cont.)
Prince of Peace Church ‐Roseville
Woodland Hills Church ‐Maplewood
9/24/2024
12
23
Recommendation
Motion to deny the zoning text amendment proposed by Applicant Trinity
International Fellowship regarding Section 35‐4103 (Allowed Use Table) of the City
Code of Ordinances, and as outlined under Planning Commission Application No.
2024‐011, that would for Places for Religious Assembly as a conditional use within
the Business Mixed‐Use (MX‐B) District.
Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested ordinance amendment on a 3‐2vote.City
staff remains of the position that, based on the findings presented, the requested ordinance amendment
should be denied; however, if City Council elects to recommend approval of the request to amend Section
35‐4103 (Allowed Use Table), the motion language would need to be amended to approve the first reading
andsetthesecondreading.
24
Alternative
Motion to approve the zoning text amendment proposed by Applicant Trinity
International Fellowship regarding Section 35‐4103 (Allowed Use Table) of the City
Code of Ordinances, and as outlined under Planning Commission Application No.
2024‐011, that would for Places for Religious Assembly as a conditional use within
the Business Mixed‐Use (MX‐B) District.
C ouncil R egular M eeng
DAT E:10/14/2024
TO :C ity C ouncil
F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager
T H R O U G H :Elizabeth H eyman - D irector of P ublic Works
BY:Reggie Edw ards , C ity M anager
S U B J E C T:Brooklyn C enter C ity C ouncil's O fficial P ublic C omment on the Minnes ota D epartment of
Trans porta5on's H ighway 252/I -94 O ver-U nder A nalys is P reference
Requested Council A con:
- M oon to approve a resoluon declar ing the Br ookly n C enter C ity C ouncil’s official public comment on the
Minnesota D epartment of Transportaon’s H ighway 252/I -94 Over/U nder analysis preference.
B ackground:
A s part of the M innesota D epartment of Tr ans por ta5 on’s (MnD OT) H ighw ay 2 5 2 /I -9 4 Environmental
review, MnD OT is asking Brookly n C enter to prov ide comment on the P has e 1 A : O v er/U nder H ighway 252
analysis. The analys is looks at w hether H ighw ay 252 s hould run ov er or under local s treets at all poten5al
interchange loca5ons . This decis ion point in the E I S proces s will allow MnD OT to set a ver5cal geometry
and begin more detailed des ign at each poten5al interchange loca5on.
Bas ed on both technical and outreach informa5on provided by M n D O T, P ublic Works staff will present the
impacts of the over/under decis ion to the C ouncil as well as a preference for over or under at 73rd, 70th, and
66rd Avenues. A draA leBer providing comments on this decis ion point is also aBached to this item for the
Council’s considera5on.
B udget I ssues:
N/A
I nclusive C ommunity Engagement:
N/A
A nracist/Equity Policy Effect:
N/A
S trategic Priories and Values:
Maintain and enhance public places
AT TA C H M E N TS :
D escrip5on U pload D ate Type
D R A F T C ouncil LeBer to MnD OT 10/11/2024 Backup M aterial
O ver Under Res olu5on 10/11/2024 Resolu5on LeBer
M ay 8, 2023 C ouncil LeBer to MnD OT 10/11/2024 Backup M aterial
Commission Nancy Daubenberger
Minnesota Department of Transportation
395 John Ireland Blvd
St. Paul, MN 55155
October 14, 2024
Re: Brooklyn Center City Council's Official Public Comment on the Minnesota Department of
Transportation's Highway 252/I-94 Over-Under Analysis Preference
Dear Commissioner Daubenberger,
On May 8, 2023, the City of Brooklyn Center sent a letter to the Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MnDOT) asking that the MN 252/I-94 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) analysis be
amended to protect human health, promote regional equity, and enhance the livability and prosperity of
Brooklyn Center, while also improving corridor safety (see attached letter). To the Council’s and our
community’s dismay, MnDOT declined to adjust the process to reflect any of the Council’s
recommendations. The Council believes the recommendations in the May 8, 2023 letter were a small
ask compared to the large impacts this project will have on the surrounding area, which is almost
completely an Environmental Justice community according to the EIS process standards. The Council
continues to stand firmly behind its May 8, 2023 recommendations.
While the Council’s recommendations have gone unaddressed, Brooklyn Center remains committed to
engaging in the EIS process and is writing to share our perspective on the project’s over-under analysis
(i.e. whether Highway 252 should run over or under the local street at each potential interchange
location). The Council has weighed the impacts of each option carefully and offer the following
preferences to MnDOT:
Highway 252 running under the local streets at 73rd and 70th Avenues: The Council supports an
'under' alignment at these intersections. While both 'over' and 'under' alignments present
challenges— including property loss, reduction in tax base, and noise pollution— running
Highway 252 under the local streets at these two locations is deemed best for long-term
livability and is preferred by the community, as reflected in MnDOT’s outreach summary. This
option minimizes noise impacts, impacts associated with long-term detrimental health impacts.1
The City understands the 'under' alignment requires more land and higher upfront costs, but if
1 Nina Roswall et al., "Residential Exposure to Traffic Noise and Health-Related Quality of Life—A Population-Based
Study," PLoS One 10, no. 3 (2015): e0120199, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120199.
MnDOT is insistent on moving only freeway options forward for study in the EIS, we believe the
‘under’ alignment is the best way to protect our community's health and quality of life.
Highway 252 running over the local street at 66th Avenue: The Council supports the 'over'
alignment. The ‘over’ alignment at 66th Ave. minimizes property impacts, specifically minimizing
impacts to the small businesses located at this intersection. Furthermore, no significant
difference in noise mitigation exists between the 'over' and 'under' alignments at this location.
Thereby, City supports MnDOT’s ‘over’ recommendation for this potential interchange location.
Carrying only freeway options forward guarantees the City permanently loses taxable properties within
the corridor. The Council's decision was guided by the desire to mitigate some impacts, particularly the
quality of life issue of noise, based on community feedback.
To address the burden that this project disproportionately places on Brooklyn Center, the City Council
requests MnDOT commit to the following:
Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT): To mitigate the permanent loss of land and tax base, we request
PILT. Brooklyn Center has one of the lowest per capita tax capacities in the Twin Cities metro
region, and any reduction to our tax base will disproportionately impact our residents. Unlike
wealthier neighboring communities, we cannot easily absorb these losses without increasing our
per capita tax burden.
Zero-Cost Share Participation: Given the guaranteed freeway approach, the City Council does
not believe the potential benefits of the MN 252/I-94 corridor outweigh the impacts to Brooklyn
Center residents or businesses, specifically in relation to air quality and noise impacts – both of
which were not analyzed during the Scoping Decision process. As a minority-majority
community being asked to shoulder new burdens, the Council requests zero-cost share
participation to acknowledge and mitigate these impacts.
We remain committed to working with MnDOT to ensure that our community's concerns are fully
addressed and that negative impacts are minimized. Brooklyn Center is willing to be a partner, but we
believe MnDOT must work diligently to reduce the long-term inequitable burdens placed on our
community while also ensuring any new facility is demonstrably safer than the existing condition.
Thank you for your continued committed collaboration.
Sincerely,
Mayor April Graves
Council Member Marquita Butler
Council Member Teneshia Kragness
Council Member Kris Lawrence- Anderson
Council Member Dan Jerzak
_____________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING THE BROOKLYN CENTER CITY
COUNCIL'S OFFICIAL PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S HIGHWAY 252/I-94 OVER-
UNDER ANALYSIS PREFERENCE
WHEREAS, on May 8, 2023, the City of Brooklyn Center requested
amendments to the MN 252/I-94 Scoping Decision Document to protect human health, promote
equity, and enhance livability, while also improving corridor safety; and
WHEREAS MnDOT declined to adjust the scoping process based on these
recommendations, despite the Council’s belief that these were reasonable requests for an
Environmental Justice community; and
WHEREAS the Council remains committed to its recommendations, the
Council’s preference for the over-under alignment analysis as follows:
Highway 252 running under the local streets at 73rd and 70th Avenues: The Council
supports the "under" alignment, as it is preferred by the community, minimizes noise, and
better protects long-term health and livability, despite higher upfront costs.
Highway 252 running over the local street at 66th Avenue: The Council supports the
"over" alignment given that it minimizes property impacts and given that there are
minimal differences in noise impacts between the over-under options.
WHEREAS the Council acknowledges the permanent loss of taxable properties
due to freeway options and requests the following to address these impacts:
Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT): To mitigate land and tax base losses, especially given
the disproportionate impacts the project will have on Brooklyn Center’s already low per
capita tax capacity.
Zero-Cost Share Participation: As an Environmental Justice community, as defined by
the EIS process, the Council requests zero-cost share participation to mitigate impacts
such as air quality and noise.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Brooklyn
Center remains committed to working with MnDOT and urges MnDOT to formalize these
commitments in an agreement with Brooklyn Center to reduce the long-term burdens on the
community. For additional details, review the attached Over-Under Letter to MnDOT, which
outlines the Council's recommendations in full.
_____________ _____ _______________________________________
Date Mayor
_______________________________________
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member:
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Minnesota Department of Transportation
395 John Ireland Blvd
St. Paul, MN 55155
May 8, 2023
Re: City of Brooklyn Center Comments on the Highway 252/I-94 Scoping Document and Draft Scoping
Decision Document
Dear Commissioner Daubenberger,
The City of Brooklyn Center appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on the Highway 252/I-
94 Scoping Document and Draft Scoping Decision Document (SDD). The Highway 252 corridor is
dangerous by design. According to the draft SDD, the full length of Highway 252 and I-94 within the
project area have a demonstrated crash problem and that crossing Highway 252, on foot or by bike, can
be difficult due to the number of lanes, crossing distances, and busy intersections. Brooklyn Center has
long advocated that the safety issues along the corridor must be addressed. Therefore, the City is
supportive of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) completing a holistic
environmental review process to chart a course for improving safety in the corridor, while at the same
time protecting human health, promoting regional equity, and enhancing the livability and prosperity of
Brooklyn Center.
It is well known that while Minnesota is one of the healthiest states in the country, it also has some of
the worst health disparities. All communities can experience poor health outcomes, but due to systemic
inequities, they disproportionately occur in communities of color and the American Indian community.
Research show that only 10 percent of health is influenced by clinical care, and another 10 percent by
genetics. The remaining 80 percent is a result of the physical environment, health behaviors, and social
and economic factors 1, making it exceedingly important to assess how plans for Highway 252/I-94 will
impact resident health.
1 Generations Health Care Initiative, “Connecting Health with Communities,” ghci.us/community-health; and World Health
Organization, “Health Impact Assessment: The Determinants of Health,” https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-impact-
assessment.
Furthermore, the majority of Brooklyn Center of residents are people of color and according to the first
report from the Highway 252/94 project’s Equity and Health Assessment,
“Compared to the typical Minnesotan, people living along the Hwy 252/I-94
corridor are at greater risk of disease, hospitalization, and death due to poor
air quality. Urban counties and counties with a higher proportion of people of
color, such as Hennepin County, have higher rates of emergency room visits,
hospitalizations, and deaths resulting from fine particle matter and ozone
exposure. Environmental Protection Agency models put the lifetime risk of
cancer from inhalation of air toxins at 31 parts per million for communities
along the corridor. This risk is a function of air toxic concentration, exposure
rates, and socioeconomic conditions.
MnDOT’s three Hwy 252 Corridor Elements recommended for advancement in the draft SDD have the
potential to deepen air quality related health inequities by introducing 34,400 – 54,500 more vehicles
per day to the Highway 252 corridor; a corridor that already carries 57,000 to 66,000 vehicles per day.
However, at this phase of the study, MnDOT is not assessing the air quality impacts of each alternative.
Given that we know the physical environment greatly influences the health, and therefore safety, of a
community, the Brooklyn Center City Council believes it is imperative to use a more holistic
understanding of safety to truly carry out an equitable analysis of the impacts of the project. Removing
all non-freeway options before air quality impacts are measured means Brooklyn Center residents, and
residents in the entire region, will never have true holistic understanding of how each alternative
performs from health and safety perspective.
Additionally, the Brooklyn Center City Council is concerned about the impact the recommended freeway
options may have on the City’s tax base. Brooklyn Center has among the lowest per capita tax capacity
within the Twin Cities metro region. This places a higher per capita tax burden on Brooklyn Center
residents compared to peer communities, including wealthier areas with a higher ability to pay. This is
partially the result of national and regional changes in commercial trends that has shifted the tax burden
from the city’s declining commercial core to the city’s modestly valued housing stock. Carrying only
freeway options through to the next phase of study guarantees decreases to the City’s tax base. The
decreases will come not just from land taken off the tax rolls through eminent domain, but also from the
property value decreases that will occur as properties directly adjacent to the proposed freeway
interchanges are negatively impacted by increased traffic levels and traffic noise.
Therefore, the Brooklyn Center City Council is asking MnDOT to make the following changes to the draft
SDD:
• Change the draft SDD to recommend the following Hwy 252 Corridor Elements for further
evaluation in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS):
o Six-Lane Expressway
o Four-Lane Low Speed Arterial Roadway
• Include pedestrian and bicycle overpasses in the definition of the Six-Lane Expressway and Four-
Lane Low Speed Arterial Roadway corridor elements.
• Revaluate how bicycle and pedestrian overpasses impact a corridor element’s multimodal level
of service.
o The City Council understands that not all users will utilize bicycle and pedestrian
overpasses. However, they find it unreasonable to accept no risk at ground-level
intersections when freeway alternatives come with their own set of risks, including
negative effects on health, safety, and property. In simpler terms, the Council believes
that incorporating bicycle and pedestrian overpasses into non-freeway Highway 252
corridor elements should result in a higher overall multimodal level of service rating,
meaning better accessibility and connectivity for various modes of transportation.
• Add project evaluation criteria that evaluate the project’s effect on the City’s tax base, including,
but not limited to, the following:
o Taxable property removed from the tax base
o Projected changes in property values
o Projected changes in business activity
• Update the project’s purpose and need statement to state:
o The purpose of the Hwy 252/I-94 Project is to improve the safe and reliable movement
of people and goods across multiple modes on and across Hwy 252 and I-94 between
Hwy 610 in Brooklyn Park and North 4th Street in Minneapolis, while protecting and
promoting human health, community livability and equity.
Sincerely,
Mayor April Graves
Council Member Marquita Butler
Council Member Teneshia Kragness
Council Member Kris Lawrence- Anderson
Council Member Dan Jerzak