HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-116 CCRMember Kragness introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-116
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING A CONTRACT,
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2024-06 2024 POND 48-001 MAINTENANCE
PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Project No.
2024-06 2024 Pond 48-001 Maintenance Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated on
the 30th day of October, 2024. Said bids were as follows:
Bidder Total Base Bid
New Look Contracting, Inc. $122,286.00
Peterson Companies $157,916.57
Veit & Company, Inc. $174,970.25
Kurilla Contracting $195,439.40
Rachel Contracting, LLC $229,843.00
Meyer Contracting, Inc. $265,430.45
Park Construction Company $305,375.43
WHEREAS, it appears that New Look Contracting, Inc. of Rogers, Minnesota is
the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter
into a contract with New Look Contracting, Inc. of Rogers, Minnesota in
the name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project No.
2024-06 2024 Pond 48-001 Maintenance Project, according to the plans and
specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the
office of the City Engineer.
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-116
2. The estimated project costs and revenues are as follows:
Amended Amended
COSTS Estimate per Low Bid
Contract $ 156,625.60 $ 122,286.00
Contingency $ 15,662.56 $ 50,002.16
Subtotal Construction Cost $ 172,288.16 $ 172,288.16
Admin/Legal/Engr. $ 153,278.84 $ 153,278.84
Total Estimated Project Cost $ 325,567.00 $ 325,567.00
Amended Amended
REVENUES Estimate per Low Bid
Street Assessment --- ---
Sanitary Sewer Utility --- ---
Water Utility Fund --- ---
Storm Drainage Utility Fund $ 325,567.00 $ 325,567.00
Street Reconstruction Fund --- ---
Total Estimated Revenue $ 325,567.00 $ 325,567.00
November 25, 2024
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Assistant City Manager/City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Jerzak
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Butler, Graves, Jerzak, Kragness
and the following voted against the same: none
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.