HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-160 CCR1
1
1
Member Dave Rosen introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 93 160
RESOLUTION REGARDING HENNEPIN COUNTY FUNDING OF COOPERATIVE
HIGHWAY PROJECTS
WHEREAS, in a policy dated June, 1978, Hennepin County established
parameters for determining an appropriate division of cost participation to be
used by the County in funding cooperative roadway and street construction
projects with municipalities; and
WHEREAS, since 1978 municipalities within the County have accepted
said policy and cooperated with the County in the construction and
reconstruction of County roads and highways; and
WHEREAS, municipalities have established capital improvement programs
which contemplate the improvement of County roads and highways based upon the
receipt of County funds as outlined in said policy; and
WHEREAS, in a draft policy dated June, 1993 and revised in August
1993, the County proposes a number of changes to the established parameters
contained in the June, 1978 policy; and
WHEREAS, all of the changes between the existing June, 1978 policy
and draft 1993 policy provide for a reduction of the County's cost
participation in the funding of cooperative roadway and street construction
projects within municipalities; and
WHEREAS, the draft June, 1993 policy includes a provision which, by
the County's own statement, is intended to discourage the use of tax increment
financing for the municipal share of a project, and when used, to require a
higher municipal cost share; and
WHEREAS, the cost division parameters contained in the June, 1978
policy have been accepted as an appropriate division of cost participation to
be used by the County and as a result has been the basis for long range
capital improvement planning by the City of Brooklyn Center; and
WHEREAS, the implementation of this policy will encourage development
in the rural or underdeveloped areas of the County and cause disinvestment in
the development areas as well as deterioration of existing facilities due to
the County's disparate funding formula. This disparity is due to the
reduction in the percentage of funding for the developed areas of the County
versus the rural areas; and
WHEREAS, the County's claim that a reduction in cost participation by
the County is justified because of the fact that County property tax funds are
becoming increasingly limited is, in fact, unjustified because in reducing its
participation, the County would shift the tax burden to the City; and
1
1
RESOLUTION NO. 93 -160
WHEREAS, the County's proposed policy relative to the use of tax
increment financing is a misguided attempt to punish municipalities attempting
to improve conditions in areas of need, when in fact, the expenditure of tax
increment financing will ultimately result in higher property tax receipts for
the County. Further, if tax increment financing is utilized, the costs of the
project to the City will increase, thereby potentially increasing the amount
of tax increment financing used, which in turn may delay the time period upon
which properties can be returned to the tax rolls.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
For the aforementioned reasons, the Hennepin County Commissioners are
urged to reject the proposed 1993 policy and retain the June 1978 policy
as an equitable means of establishing an appropriate division of cost
participation to be used by the County in funding cooperative roadway
and street construction projects with municipalities.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Brooklyn Center will assist
Hennepin County officials to obtain increased funding through the County State
Aid formula which is currently an unfair allocation according to population.
September 27, 1993
ATTEST:
ii,a/2Ayt kruttaix
Deputy Clerk
Date Todd Paulson, Mayor
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Celia Scott and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
Todd Paulson, Celia Scott, Dave Rosene, Barb Kalligher, and Kristen Mann;
and the following voted against the same: none,
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.