HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-180 CCR1
1
1
Member Celia Scott
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -180
introduced the following
RESOLUTION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF APPLICATION
NO. 90022 SUBMITTED BY THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
WHEREAS, Application No. 90022 submitted by the City of
Brooklyn Center proposes rezoning from I -1 (Industrial Park) to C1A
(Service /Office) six parcels of land lying between Summit Drive and
Interstate 94 and between Shingle Creek Parkway and Highway 100;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called
public hearing on August 16, 1990 when testimony regarding the
request was taken; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission on August 16, 1990
considered and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 90 -2
recommending approval of the proposed rezoning in light of the
Guidelines for Evaluating Rezoning in the Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Council considered the rezoning proposal at
its August 27, 1990 regular meeting and held a duly called public
hearing at which testimony regarding the matter was taken; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that the proposed rezoning is
in the best interests of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Brooklyn Center that Application No. 90022 submitted by the
City of Brooklyn Center is hereby approved in consideration of the
following:
1. The C1A zoning is consistent with the existing land
development in the area in question. The present
I -1 zoning allows for industrial uses which would
be inconsistent with other land uses in this area.
2. All permitted uses in the C1A zoning district can
be contemplated for development of the subject
properties.
3. Since the original I -1 zoning of this land, the
Shingle Creek Parkway interchange with the freeway
has been constructed which has improved access to
the area and made high density development more
desirable.
4. The City's interest in quality aesthetics and
increased tax base and keeping the character of the
area high -rise office will be served by the
proposed rezoning.
1
1
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -180
5. The subject properties will bear fully the
ordinance development restrictions for the CIA
district.
6. The location of the six parcels contained in the
rezoning application is no longer suited to
industrial uses.
7. The rezoning will result in the expansion of a
zoning district which is warranted by a) the
City's Comprehensive Plan; b) the lack of
developable land in the CIA district; and c) the
best interests of the community.
8. The best long -term use of the parcels in question
is high -rise office.
9. In light of the above, it is felt that the proposed
rezoning is consistent with the Guidelines for
Evaluating Rezonings contained in Section 35 -208 of
the Zoning Ordinance and is, there •re, in the best
interests of the r munity.
August 27, 1990
Date
ATTEST: `C W l A k f%)....1-J__.
Deputy Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by member Philip Cohen and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist,
Celia Scott, Todd Paulson, Jerry Pedlar, and Philip Cohen;
and the following voted against the same: none,
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.