Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024.12.19 CCP SPECIALCouncil Special M eeting City Hall Council Chambers December 19, 2024 AGE NDA 1.Call to Order - 5:00 p.m. The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full City C ounc il packet is available to the public . The packet ring binder is loc ated at the entrance of the council chambers. 2.Roll Call 3.Council Consideration Items A.Resolution Approving the 2025 L egislative Priorities - Motion to Approve a Resolution Adopting the Brooklyn Center 2025 Legislative Priorities for the Purpose of Advocating at the State and Federal Levels on Issues that Impact the City of Brooklyn Center. B.Summary of Performance Review for Dr. E dwards C.Revised Contract for Dr. E dwards 4.Adjourn C ouncil Special Meeng DAT E:12/19/2024 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :N/A BY:D r. Reginald Edw ards , C ity M anager S U B J E C T:Res olu+on A pproving the 2025 L egis la+ve P riori+es B ackground: AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip+on U pload D ate Type 2025 L egis la+ve P riori+es 12/16/2024 Backup M aterial Res olu+on 12/16/2024 Backup M aterial Page 1 of 13 November 2024 City of Brooklyn Center 2025 Legislative Agenda Page 2 of 13 Overview The City of Brooklyn Center works together with its partners to support proposals for new legislation in Minnesota designed to strengthen the community. The following list of legislative priorities and positions, along with those prepare by the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority (EDA), constitute Brooklyn Center's legislative agenda for the 2024 legislative session. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion The City of Brooklyn Center, with our rich racial, ethnic and demographic diversity is committed to supporting local, state and federal policies and investments that advance the goals of eliminating racial and economic disparities in areas such as housing, employment, transportation, health care, safety, etc., and works towards a more inclusive economy. Many of the detailed advocated for in this document strive to achieve these goals. Page 3 of 13 Administration • BCLG 01-2025: Official Notifications / Information Access – The City of Brooklyn Center supports the state in eliminating outdated and unnecessary publication requirements no longer relevant or representative of the City's technological capabilities. Justification – Currently, the state has laws mandating the City to establish an "official" or "qualified" newspaper for formal city notifications. The law specifies that cities designate only "one" newspaper; it must be printed in English, and if it is a daily newspaper, it must be distributed at least five days each week, etc. While the notification standards established in 1949 were well intended, they may not be complete or applicable to contemporary methods of communication or cost-efficient. • BCLG 02-2025: Funding for Cultural Centers/Museums and Other Community Building Assets- the City of Brooklyn Center encourages the Legislature to provide funding and provide new rules that will support the establishment of Cultural Museum/Centers that reflect the unique traditions and values provided by immigrants, new Americans and diverse communities; thereby enriching the lives of all Minnesotans. Justification – As one of the most ethnically and culturally diverse communities in the State of Minnesota, we believe that this strength should be valued and shared. Various cultural organizations and groups would love the opportunity to collaborate with the government, non-profits, and others to share the benefits of their culture. We believe the state can play an extremely valuable role by providing funding to build capacity and facilitate opportunities for these groups to add to the culture of Minnesota in a lasting and meaningful way. We believe existing grant programs should be modified, or new funding should be approved to encourage Cultural Centers, Museums, and Arts to support the goal of cultural inclusion and diversity in the state. Business and Economic Development • BCLG 03-2025: Small Business Development – The city supports city and non-profit partnerships in developing small business centers, incubators, and other affordable commercial opportunities for small and BIPOC owned businesses. Agency’s such as African Career Education and Resources and CAPI USA provide support for small businesses and are critical in Brooklyn Center’s business community. • BCLG 04-2025: Business Tenant Protection – The city supports the state in creating more protection for tenants within commercial properties, with a focus on small lower-income businesses who are at greater risk of displacement. The City of Brooklyn Center has received more recent feedback relating to commercial tenants with challenging lease situation. • BCLG 05-2025: Youth Tax Credit – The City of Brooklyn Center supports efforts by the state to create an internship-to-work tax credit for organizations hosting young workers in Brooklyn Center. This type of tax credit program exists now but is targeted at Greater Minnesota. Page 4 of 13 Justification – One of the City's strategic priorities is "Resident Economic Stability". This program would provide an incentive for businesses to participate in the BrookLynk Program of the Brooklyn Bridge Alliance. • BCLG 06-2025: Workforce Readiness – The City of Brooklyn Center supports efforts of the state to fund fully the Minnesota Job Skills Partnership and other workforce training programs. The City also supports the state in providing flexible funding to local workforce councils and pursuing creative programming and funding. Finally, the City supports efforts to design and implement programs designed to address youth employment and workforce readiness. Justification – One of the City's strategic priorities is "Resident Economic Stability". This program would provide an incentive for businesses to participate in the BrookLynk Program of the Brooklyn Bridge Alliance. This effort would also, support the City's strategic priority of "Resident Economic Stability". BCLG 07-2025: TIF District Flexibility - The City of Brooklyn Center generally supports efforts of the State to increase the flexibility of TIF to facilitate redevelopment and housing activities and supports creating special legislation that will allow for creation of two or more redevelopment TIF districts within the Opportunity Site. Justification - In the Opportunity Site Redevelopment Area, The City has made significant investment in the acquisition and demolition of properties to achieve redevelopment goals laid out in the Master Plan. Market forces are also leading to significant delays in development of the property. Both factors a diminishing the effectiveness of TIF within the Opportunity Site. The City proposes special legislation that will allow for creation of one or more redevelopment TIF districts within the Opportunity Site., even if those areas cannot qualify based on existing statutory requirements. BCLG 08-2025: Opportunity Site Phase 1 Infrastructure Bonding - The City is requesting critical legislative funding that will fill gap funding necessary for the build out of Phase 1 of the Opportunity Site. The request is for $3,000,000 that will close the remaining funding gap allowing for the construction of infrastructure to phase 1 of the opportunity site. Justification – Phase 1 of the opportunity site will bring over 700 units of multifamily housing, local- oriented commercial business spaces, an event center and public gathering spaces. The city has already received $3.6 million in grants for the infrastructure and this final piece of state bonding would allow for construction to begin on the infrastructure. 1 2 Page 5 of 13 Essential Services BCLG 09-2025: Brooklyn Center Public Works Garage – The City of Brooklyn Center supports increased state funding for transportation maintenance facilities, like the Brooklyn Center Public Works Garage, which provides critical regional services. Justification – The 50-year-old Brooklyn Center Public Works garage is outdated, creating safety risks and operational inefficiencies. Its size and design limit the safe use of large equipment like snowplows and have insufficient space for modern upgrades, such as charging stations for an electrified fleet. Renovations are cost-prohibitive, with $3.5 million in deferred maintenance. Public Works operations are essential to regional mobility, including snow and ice control for areas like Shingle Creek Crossing, and aiding the movement of Brooklyn Center's significant essential worker population. Financial • BCLG 10-2025: Metro Area Fiscal Disparities (4D Transition Aid) – The supports state funding for cities recovering tax losses due to 4D Transition Aid. Justification - Our region needs more units of affordable housing and deeper levels of affordability. Brooklyn Center supports initiatives to increase affordable housing supply in in the state. The recent legislative changes to the 4d tax classification however, disproportionality affects cities with several 4d properties whose tax bases are already stressed. Brooklyn Center is expected to lose over $250,000 in tax capacity over 2021 levels when the new rate is effective in 2025 (from non TIF-captured parcels). This translates to $145,388 in the City's portion of taxes assuming pay 2024 tax rates. The new bill does support transition aid in 2025 and 2026 for communities whose tax capacity in 4d property exceeds 2% of total tax capacity. Based on current calculations, Brooklyn Center is now expecting $0 in aid under this program. The City supports increasing the transition aid to cover cost for the entire tax impact and extending the benefit past 2026. • BCLG 11-2025: Metro Area Fiscal Disparities - Brooklyn Center was once a net contributor to the Fiscal Disparities pool. Today as a net recipient, the fiscal disparity is a major factor contributing to the fiscal stability of the City and our taxpayers. Without Fiscal Disparities, the property tax burden in Brooklyn Center would escalate dramatically, perhaps more than 25%. We strongly encourage continued legislative support for Metro Area Fiscal Disparities. • BCLG 12-2025: Sales Tax Exemption Simplification - We advocate for a way to simplify the utility of the current sales tax exemption for construction materials. The process for using the current sales tax exemption on construction is so complicated, risky, and burdensome to contractors and cities that we are aware of no city that has decided to use this exemption. In Brooklyn Center, we estimate savings of $300-$400 thousand annually for our neighborhood street and utility construction projects if the sales tax exemption was viable. • BCLG 13-2025: Property Tax Relief – The City of Brooklyn Center supports efforts of the state to increase property tax relief for property owners experiencing high tax burdens due to property tax shifts. Justification - The City has experienced significant shifts in tax capacity growth from commercial to 3 Page 6 of 13 residential properties throughout the years of the most recent economic recession. As a result, residential property owners have endured a tax shift burden. We expect this trend to continue for the coming years as housing values continue to recover and commercial and industrial market values normalize. • BCLG 14-2025: Local Government Aid (LGA) – The City of Brooklyn Center supports the existing LGA funding formula as an appropriate mechanism to distribute LGA. The city supports adding an annual indexing factor to the formula. In addition, the city supports, adding a racial and economic equity factor to the existing formula and opposes special funding using LGA funds. Justification – LGA has been cut for many years. The City’s budget stability continues to be dependent on LGA funding. Any changes in the formula or siphoning of funds from the overall pool for special projects may be detrimental to the City’s financial stability. Health and Well-Being • BCLG 15-2025: Racial Trauma Treatment - The City of Brooklyn Center supports the state supports the state adding “racial trauma” to eligible conditions for psychological condition treatment. Justification – Currently state statute stipulates that an employee seeking psychological condition treatment approval shall pay the employee’s full salary and employer-provided benefits. The state does not list “racial trauma” as an eligible condition for psychological condition treatment. Thereby, currently staff cannot receive pay or benefits during a time of seeking psychological condition treatment. According to the National Center for PTSD, (website: www.ptsd.va.gov/understand/types/racial_trauma.asp, October 2024), “Racial trauma can lead to an increased risk of physical and mental health problems. University of Georgia, Department of Psychology, (website: https://psychology.uga.edu./coping-racial-trauma, 2019), states “experiences with racial discrimination are associated with negative mental (e.g., depression, anxiety, hopelessness, violent behavior) and physical (e.g., hypertension, thickening and calcification of the arteries, and hear rate variability) health outcomes (https://www.semanticsscholar.org/papter/Percieved-descrimination-health-%3A-a- review.-Pascoe-Richman/886863c7ce89acfe9551d8fca9699381297cef52).Psychologically (https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/cou-59-1-1.pdf), racial trauma can cause symptoms that mirror those of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): re-experiencing of distressing events, higher reports of somatization when distressed, chronic stress, negative emotions/depression, hypervigilance, and avoidance. Housing • BCLG 16-2025: Tenant Protections - The City of Brooklyn Center supports revising existing regulations that restrict local governments from enacting tenant protection measures. Further, the City of Brooklyn Center supports new legislation that clarifies and creates tools that support tenant protection measures, both locally and state-wide. These tools include but are not limited to, preventing discrimination based on income sources, limiting tenant screening practices, preventing non-renewals of leases without just cause, and retaliation by rental property owners. • BCLG 17-2025: Affordable Housing - The City of Brooklyn Center supports the creation of additional Page 7 of 13 programs, tools, and funding that address the concentration of poverty and ensure the fair distribution of affordable housing opportunities across the Twin Cities metro. Specifically, the State should establish a housing tax credit contribution fund, increase funding for the Economic Development and Challenge Fund Grant program, and support dedicated funding for housing through bonding and general fund revenue. Justification – Vacancy rates remain low, and the market is not keeping up with the demand for affordable housing options. Cities want to play a role in addressing this issue but lack the resources and the flexible tools to create partnerships with public and private entities to ensure an adequate supply of affordable housing options. The City of Brooklyn Center wants to ensure that current and future policies are sensitive to ensuring all communities within the Twin Cities metro are absorbing affordable housing at an equal rate to avoid segregating certain populations or concentrating poverty. As it stands, the City of Brooklyn Center is a heavily tax burdened community and over 2% of its net tax capacity is in 4d properties. • BCLG 18-2025: Group Homes and Assisted Living Licensures – The City of Brooklyn Center believes current regulations for group homes disproportionately impact lower-income communities and communities of color. The City requests that the Legislature amend these regulations to address unintended consequences, including allowing certain non-first-class cities to establish density requirements and reinstituting the ability of a municipality to require a rental license. Currently, only cities of the first class (with populations over 100,000) have the authority to mandate a minimum distance of 1,320 feet (1/4 mile) from existing MDH Assisted Living facilities. There are no minimum distance requirements for DHS Community Residential Setting facilities. Justification – Our experience shows that single-family affordable housing neighborhoods attract investors looking to profit from establishing group homes. Brooklyn Center has seen a significant increase in the number of these homes. This concentration in lower-income neighborhoods limits homeownership opportunities and wealth accumulation for residents, and it can alter the character of the community. Additionally, these properties place a strain on local emergency response agencies, as they tend to generate a higher volume of service calls. According to MN Statutes 245A.11, subdivision 1, individuals residing in group homes cannot be excluded from the benefits of normal residential surroundings by municipal zoning ordinances or land use regulations. Group homes with a licensed capacity of 6 or fewer persons are permitted as single- family residential uses for zoning purposes, and as of May 18, 2024, state-licensed group homes with 6 or fewer persons are exempt from rental licensing requirements in Minnesota, including those licensed under Minnesota Statutes 144G.45 and 245D.02. The Commissioner of the Department of Health must consider the population, size, land use plan, availability of community services, and the number and size of existing licensed MDH Assisted Living facilities in any city where an applicant seeks to operate a facility; however, as of October 2024, Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park— the only two cities in Hennepin County with over 50% BIPOC populations—hold nearly 50% of all MDH Assisted Living licenses in Hennepin County. • BCLG 19-2025: Emergency Shelter/Transitional Housing Use in Hotels – The City of Brooklyn Center supports a more even distribution of emergency homeless shelters and transitional housing at area Page 8 of 13 hotels and motels, as paid by voucher. Justification – The City of Brooklyn Center is home to 10 hotels; however, the City of Brooklyn Center has become increasingly aware of our hotels moving away from their original intended and approved use as a hotel facility and towards semi-permanent housing. In Brooklyn Center, hotels are lodging accommodations for stays of less than a month. The City is aware of hotels being purchased or considered for acquisition in the City for use as transitional housing. In the case of private ownership, this provides a guaranteed income stream by entering a contract with county services. Removal of hotel accommodations from our City is not in alignment with the City’s goals for economic competitiveness and employment, of which in part include the provision of accessible hotel accommodations to our City’s employment centers. As the City is built out, there are limited opportunities to provide quality accommodations for those visiting the area and has resulted in the increased use of City resources. • BCLG 20-2025: Building Officials – The City of Brooklyn Center supports efforts of the state to increase its efforts to train new and diverse building officials and provide sufficient education to help local officials administer and enforce construction regulations. Justification – The City has established city priorities related to resident economic stability and the value of diversity and inclusion. There is a shortage of building officials in the state and a greater shortage of building officials of color. Sufficient funding and support by the state would permit the City and other cities to have access to a broader pool of candidates for building officials in the future. Public Safety • BCLG 21-2025: Permanent Prevention and Intervention Public Safety Aid - The City supports extension and permanent funding of Public Safety Aid. Justification – In 2023, the State Legislature passed one-time funding “Public Safety Aid” for purposes of supporting public safety, including community violence prevention and intervention programs, community engagement; mental health crisis; victim serves; training programs; first responder- wellness; equipment related to fire, rescue, emergency services; or to pay other personnel or equipment costs. Public safety response strategies alone are not sustainable financially or to the well- being and health of humans. Cities, counties and communities have little to no abilities to fund the critical public safety strategies of prevention and intervention. Permanent funding of community- centered public safety prevention and intervention will lead to a more sustainable, healthier and well- being of people. • BCLG 22-2025: Support for a Deferred Retirement Option Plan (DROP) for Law Enforcement Officers - The City of Brooklyn Center supports the implementation of a Deferred Retirement Option Plan (DROP) or a similar program for law enforcement officers in Minnesota. Such programs allow senior officers to retire while continuing to work and accrue retirement benefits, providing financial incentives for experienced officers to extend their careers. The City recognizes the value of maintaining a seasoned workforce and the potential benefits of retaining senior officers to support leadership continuity, mentorship of younger officers, and overall departmental stability. Justification - DROP programs have been successfully implemented in various states, encouraging veteran officers to remain in service for a few additional years, thereby alleviating immediate staffing challenges and ensuring that experienced officers can contribute to departmental objectives. A Page 9 of 13 similar program in Minnesota could address ongoing recruitment and retention issues and enhance public safety by leveraging the skills of veteran officers. • BCLG 23-2025: Presumption of Privacy for Body-Worn Cameras Used by Non-Licensed Police Staff - The City of Brooklyn Center supports extending the presumption of privacy for Body-Worn Camera (BWC) footage to non-sworn staff, in alignment with the current state law that protects BWC data collected by licensed peace officers. This expansion would ensure that BWC data recorded by non- licensed police staff, such as Cadets, community service officers, or professional staff, is classified as private or nonpublic data, except when specifically required by law to be released. This adjustment aligns with the broader privacy protections afforded to licensed peace officers and supports the responsible use of technology to enhance public trust and safety without compromising individual privacy. Justification - BWCs have proven to be a valuable tool for transparency and accountability. However, it is important to extend the same privacy protections to non-licensed police staff, as their roles also involve sensitive interactions with community members. This proposal ensures consistency in data classification and builds community trust while respecting privacy. • BCLG 24–2025: Race Identification on Driver’s License – The City of Brooklyn Center supports legislative efforts to improve race-related data collection by offering individuals the option to self- identify their race on their driver’s license. This option should be voluntary and include safeguards to ensure that the data is used exclusively for the purpose of improving racial equity and reducing bias in law enforcement activities. Justification – Accurate race-related data is critical for assessing and addressing racial disparities in policing. Allowing individuals to self-identify their race on their driver’s license provides a more precise and voluntary method of data collection, supporting efforts to develop fair and equitable law enforcement practices. The City remains committed to reducing racial bias and inequity in policing through data-driven policies. • BCLG 25-2025: Cop Autism Response Education and Technologies - The City of Brooklyn Center supports legislative funding for the expansion of the COP Autism Response Education (CARE) training model and the development and utilization of innovative technologies that improve public safety responses to individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). These technologies could include apps, sensory tools, or other support systems that enhance communication and understanding between first responders and individuals on the autism spectrum. Justification- As more individuals are diagnosed with ASD, first responders must be equipped with tools to provide appropriate and effective services. The use of supportive technologies can help bridge communication gaps and ensure safer, more inclusive responses for all community members, without prescribing a specific technology, such as the Vitals App, which may not be universally suitable. • BCLG 26-2025: Juveniles in Municipal Jails – The City of Brooklyn Center supports efforts by the state to clarify state statutes that would allow juveniles to be held for questioning and booking in the City jail for up to six hours. Page 10 of 13 Justification – The City would have more of an opportunity and time to work with a juvenile to resolve or remedy their situations before being transported to Hennepin County Jails should the state increase the max time juveniles may be held in a licensed municipal jail. • BCLG 27-2025: 21st Century Policing – The City of Brooklyn Center reaffirms its support for implementing the principles and strategies outlined in the President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing and calls for sustained state funding to enhance training, officer wellness initiatives, and the adoption of modern policing technologies. This includes body-worn cameras, de-escalation techniques, and holistic safety approaches. The City encourages the integration of whole-of- government and whole-of-community strategies to achieve safe, healthy communities. Justification - The recent report, Task Force on 21st Century Policing: A Renewed Call to Action (April 2023), emphasizes the need for transformation in policing through collaboration, public trust, and reducing the harm associated with aggressive enforcement. By focusing on community safety over crime suppression and supporting training in de-escalation and other non-violent conflict resolution techniques, Brooklyn Center can ensure its officers are well-prepared to meet the demands of modern policing. Ongoing funding will allow the City to invest in technology, officer wellness programs, and community-led policing strategies, all of which align with the holistic safety model that prioritizes long-term trust and partnership between police and the community. • BCLG 28-2025: Appropriation; Fencing Consortium - $5,000,000 in fiscal year 2024 is appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of public safety for a grant to the Fencing Consortium for acquisition of anti-scale fencing, pedestrian doors, and vehicle gates for local government facilities statewide to improve equitable access to a de-escalation and safety tool. This appropriation is available until the project is completed or abandoned, subject to Minnesota Statutes, section 16A.642. This is a onetime appropriation. Justification – Currently there is a consortium of Hennepin County cities participating in this joint effort. Having the state take the lead on this effort would benefit all entities across the State of Minnesota. • BCLG 29-2025: Regional Live Fire Training Facility (located in Dayton) – The city supports funding for the Dayton Regional live fire training facility. Justification - The Dayton facility will include a live burn tower where we can teach and learn with live fire training and operations from a multi-story training building. There currently is no option for this type of training in the NW metro. Having this type of resource available to departments would be great in expanding fire training for our firefighters. The demand for this type of regional facility is in huge demand since many of our paid-on call firefighters have only a few years of service and very little real- life training. Brooklyn Center Fire Department would use this type of training facility many times annually. • BCLG 30-2025: Continued and increased funding to MNFIRE and MBFTE – The city supports continued and increased funding of MNFIRE and MBFE Page 11 of 13 Justification - Both State funded programs offer resources to fire fighters and fire departments that are crucial for the wellbeing of our fire fighters. Brooklyn Center takes advantage of both programs annually and the extra resources are vital to our budget. MNFIRE is a wellbeing program that helps firefighters deal with top problems many fire fighters encounter while or after serving their community, such as cancer, sleep, emotional trauma, and nutrition. BCFD has been trained in all their classes they currently offer for free. MBFTE give each city back training dollars and pays most of the initial firefighter training, again crucial for departments budgets to continue this. • BCLG 31-2025: Public Safety Responder Mental Health and Well-Being – The city supports creation and permanent funding for public safety responder mental health and well-being. Justification - During service to their community, front line first responders handle some of the most difficult calls. One call or the totality of calls in one’s career, can negatively impact their mental and physical health if not addressed properly. While we continue to normalize the conversations surrounding mental health, we must provide resources to first responder staff to live, work and retire healthy. PTSD related retirements have grown exponentially in the recent years. PTSD is treatable; we need to ensure we are providing prevention, resiliency and treatment options for our first responders. • BCLG 32–2025: Lithium-Ion Battery Safety - Brooklyn Center support efforts to ensure modernized firefighters training, fire suppression methods and fire codes. Lithium batteries supply power to many kinds of devices, but if not properly handled can catch fire or explode. Justification – Traditional firefighting techniques that use water to extinguish fire are inadequate when fighting these lithium-ion batteries. These fires in particular pose serious risks to life safety. Any legislation impacting the use or disposal of lithium-ion batteries, including requirements for EV charging stations should be vetted with input from MNFAC and the understanding of risks associated with the batteries, including thermal runaway, stranded energy, deep seated fire and generation of toxic and flammable gases. Transportation • BCLG 33-2025: Highway 252/I-94 Project – The City of Brooklyn Center supports the State in addressing the long-standing safety issues on Trunk Highway (TH) 252, while at the same time protecting human health, promoting regional equity, and enhancing the livability and prosperity of Brooklyn Center. Justification - The TH 252 corridor is dangerous by design. According to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), the full length of Highway 252 and I-94 within the project area has a demonstrated crash problem, and crossing Highway 252, on foot or by bike, can be difficult due to the number of lanes, crossing distances, and busy intersections. Brooklyn Center has long advocated that the safety issues along the corridor must be addressed. However, the solution to the problem needs to ensure the project protects human health, promotes regional equity, and enhances the livability and prosperity of Brooklyn Center. Specifically, the City supports the following initiatives: o Using racial and economic equity factors when considering state and local cost shares for the Highway 252/I-94 Project. Page 12 of 13 o Creating and funding strategies to mitigate the impact the project will have on the local tax base. o Zero cost share for the City in the event that MnDOT moves forward with a freeway alternative. o Payment in lieu of taxes for all lands taken off the tax rolls due to the project. • BCLG 34-2025: MVLST Funding - The City of Brooklyn Center supports including Hennepin County in the distribution of motor vehicle lease sales tax (MVLST). Justification - Hennepin County residents contribute substantially to the MVLST, but State Law excludes the county from receiving funding from this transportation source. If included, Hennepin County would receive $10.4 million annually for roads, bridges, and pedestrian and bikeway projects. The rationale to exclude Hennepin and Ramsey counties from receiving MVLST formula funds was based on enabling new taxing authority through the creation of the County's Transit Improvement Board (CTIB). With CTIB's dissolution in 2017, this rationale for excluding Hennepin and Ramsey counties from receiving MVLST Formula funds has ceased to exist. • BCLG 35-2025: Transportation Funding – The City of Brooklyn Center supports the state by providing more funding, including bonding, for improvements to all components of the transportation system. The City specifically supports funding for the TH 252/I-94 project and the Blue Line Light Rail Extension Justification – The City supports a well-funded regional transportation system. Additional funding by the Legislature would permit the City to access various funding sources from the Minnesota Department of Transportation for City projects. • BCLG 36-2025: City Cost Participation on State and County Roads – supports flexibility in, or exemption from, cost participation policies when a city cannot meet cost share obligations due to unique circumstances. The City calls for special or additional funding for cities that have burdens of additional cost participation in projects involving state and county roads including the placement of underground utilities due to those projects. Justification – When municipal state aid (MSA) eligible cities (those with populations greater than >5,000) face significant cost participation requirements related to state and county road projects, they commonly dedicate all or large portions of their available MSA to meet cost participation obligations. When this happens, MSA funds are not available for use on the MSA system within the city, and local taxpayers must fully fund their own local roads and stormwater infrastructure. This has been exacerbated by significant new transportation infrastructure investments on the trunk highway system authorized by the state and federal governments. Additionally, these state and county projects often present a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to replace or rehabilitate utilities under regional roadways, forcing cities to allocate resources immediately and defer more urgent utility infrastructure needs. “The one-size fits all” cost participation policies adopted by the state and counties are inequitable. They do not consider unique factors including a disproportionate number of trunk highway lane miles in some communities, the high cost of some projects, or tax base challenges that may limit the financial ability of some cities to pay. Cost participation obligations can consume the finances or debt capacity of communities for many years. Furthermore, regional agencies are mainly focused on facilitating travel Page 13 of 13 and commerce through--and not into--a local community. Trends in cost share policies, including ownership and long-term maintenance of regional assets, continue to add to the local burden every time a cost share policy is updated or developed. _____________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2024- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2025 BROOKLYN CENTER LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES WHEREAS, in February 2025, the Minnesota Legislature will start its annual legislative session, which will end by mid-May of this year; and WHEREAS, each year the City develops and adopts a legislative agenda for the purposes of advocating at the state and federal levels on issues that impact Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, in preparation for discussion and adoption of the Brooklyn Center 2025 Legislative Priorities, the following documents were provided for review: • 2024 – 2029 Strategic Plan • 2024 Legislative Priorities • Mockup of 2025 Legislative Priorities • Draft 2025 Annual Legislative Process WHEREAS, on December 9th, 2024, the Brooklyn Center City Council approved of the City’s 2025 Legislative Priorities; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Brooklyn Center City Council adopts these legislative priorities for the purpose of advocating at the state and federal level on issues that impact Brooklyn Center. December 19, 2024_ _______________________________________ Date Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ Assistant City Manager/City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member: and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. C ouncil Special Meeng DAT E:12/19/2024 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :N/A BY: S U B J E C T:S ummary of Performance Review for D r. Edw ards B ackground: AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip0on U pload D ate Type Performance S ummary 12/27/2024 Backup M aterial BR291-4-995428.v1 City Council’s Public Performance Review Summary of Dr. Reggie Edwards, City Manager December 19, 2024 Attendees: Mayor April Graves, Councilperson Marquita Butler, Councilperson Dan Jerzak, Councilperson Kris Lawrence-Anderson, Councilperson Teneshia Kragness This document is meant to be read to the public. It is a high-level summary of the performance review delivered by Council to Dr. Reggie Edwards, City Manager. The memo is just read. There isn’t an opportunity for discussion or questions. Summary: The City Council met in closed session on November 25 and December 9, 2024, to conduct the performance evaluation of City Manager, Dr. Reggie Edwards. The Council reviewed the City Manager’s self-evaluation form and referenced other documents. Each Councilmember then submitted their own impressions regarding the City Manager’s performance over the last year. Next, Councilmembers met to summarize their collective opinion. They identified certain areas for Dr. Edwards to focus on in the following areas: enhance economic growth, develop financial sustainability, increase safety for the community and our employees, improve employee engagement and establish effective communication. This summary was shared with Dr. Edwards on December 17, 2024. The City Council has also revised the City Manager’s job description and finalized the employment agreement with the City Manager. C ouncil Special Meeng DAT E:12/19/2024 TO :C ity C ouncil F R O M:D r. Reggie Edwards, City Manager T H R O U G H :N/A BY: S U B J E C T:Revised Contract for D r. Edw ards B ackground: AT TA C H M E N TS : D escrip.on U pload D ate Type C ontract 12/27/2024 Backup M aterial 1 BR291-431-994792.v1 City Manager Employment Agreement THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this 19th day of December, 2024 by and between the City of Brooklyn Center, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”) and Dr. Reginald M. Edwards (“Manager”). The City and the Manager may hereinafter be referred to individually as a “party” or collectively as the “parties.” RECITALS A. City wishes to engage the services of Manager as a professional employee of the City. B. The parties wish to set forth the terms and conditions of their relationship in this Agreement in order to secure and retain the services of Manager, assure the requisite flexibility to enable Manager to function as City’s chief administrative official, and to provide a means for the Brooklyn Center City Council (“Council”) to terminate Manager’s services if it determines such termination is appropriate. C. The nature of Manager’s position requires continued professional training and attendance at meetings during evenings and other non-traditional work times. D. Manager desires to accept employment as City Manager of City in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in this Agreement. AGREEMENT In consideration of the mutual covenants set forth in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows: 1. Duties. City agrees to employ Manager as City Manager to perform the functions and duties specified in the City Charter, City Code, Minnesota Statutes, chapter 412, as amended, and such other duties which are consistent therewith and as may be assigned from time to time by the Council. 2. Discharge of Duties. Manager shall be paid a salary as a professional employee and shall not be paid overtime for hours in excess of 40 hours per week, and similarly shall be able to be absent in consideration of extraordinary time expenditures. The discharge of Manager’s duties requires work outside the normal workday for meetings and projects. To that end, Manager will work flexible hours as is necessary to enable Manager to effectively discharge the duties of Manager’s position. 3. Outside Activities. Manager agrees to remain in the exclusive employ of City and neither to accept other employment nor to become employed by any other employer during the term of Manager’s employment. This provision does not prohibit Manager from engaging in occasional teaching, writing, consulting, or military reserve service performed during Manager’s time off, provided such outside activities do not interfere with the performance of 2 BR291-431-994792.v1 Manager’s duties for City. This provision does not prohibit Manager from seeking outside employment. 4. Evaluation. Council shall review Manager’s performance of the duties of the position annually, or at such other times as Council may determine are appropriate. Such evaluations shall be based on written performance goals established by the Council, and the general duties set forth in this Agreement. The goals should be (1) linked to the City’s strategic priorities (and other identified organizational outcomes), (2) include agreed up on metrics, and (3) be timebound within the evaluation period, which is usually the calendar year. Goals should be determined early enough in the calendar year for the city manager to be able to adequately pursue them. There should be at least one formal review at midyear, though informal feedback may be delivered to the city manager at other times during the year. 5. Term. This Agreement shall be effective as of the date on this contract and shall continue for an indefinite term until terminated by one or both of the parties as set forth in this Agreement. Manager and Council will review this Agreement every three years for potential amendment and/or revision. Time will be calculated using the most recent effective date of this Agreement between the Parties. Nothing in this Agreement prevents, limits, or otherwise interferes with the right of Council to terminate the services of Manager at any time, with or without cause, subject only to the provisions set forth in City Charter, Section 6.01 and this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement prevents, limits, or otherwise interferes with the right of Manager to resign at any time, subject only to the provisions of this Agreement. Nothing in this agreement prevents Council from reviewing this Agreement as requested or desired. 6. Participation in Employee Benefits. (a) Health Insurance. City shall provide health insurance coverage for Manager in the same fashion as it provides health insurance for non-union employees. (b) Life Insurance. City shall provide life insurance coverage for Manager in the same fashion as it provides life insurance for non-union employees. (c) Other Benefits. Except as otherwise specified within this Agreement, Manager shall receive or be eligible to participate in any other benefits provided City’s non-union employees generally. 7. Vacation and Holidays. (a) Vacation. Manager shall accrue days of vacation on the first day of each month equal to an annual rate of 20 days per year. Manager may accrue vacation to a maximum accumulation of 230 hours. Manager shall not be required to use vacation leave except for a whole day’s absence from performing Manager’s duties. Manager may, at Manager’s discretion, take ½ day increments of vacation leave for an absence from the performance of Manager’s duties. 3 BR291-431-994792.v1 (b) Holidays. Manager shall have the same paid holidays off from work as City’s non-union employees. 8. Sick Leave. Manager shall accrue days of sick leave at the same rate as other non-union employees. 9. Compensation. (a) Initial Salary. Manager’s initial salary as of the Effective Date of this Agreement shall be $173,608.79 per year. Such salary shall be paid at the intervals customarily used for other City employees. Any changes in the Manager’s salary shall be pursuant to the written agreement of Manager and City. All such amendments shall be incorporated in and made part of this Agreement. (1) Cost of Living Increase (COLA) Salary Increase. Manager’s annual COLA salary increase shall be determined at the same time and as commensurate with the salary increases for other non-union employees of City. It will be rewarded at the same time as other non-union employees. (2) Merit Increase. Manager may receive an increase in salary based on the results of an annual performance review (Section 4). It will be effective on the next pay period after the review has been presented to Manager. Pursuant to the final evaluation results, Manager will receive a four percent (4%) salary increase for a performance evaluation score of “exceeds expectations.” Manager will receive a two and a half percent (2.5%) salary increase for a performance evaluation score of “meets expectations.” Manager will not receive a performance-related salary increase for performance evaluation score of “below expectations.” (b) Personal Auto Usage. Manager shall be provided with a City-owned vehicle for traveling to and from work. City may, at any time after two years from the Effective Date of this Agreement, review the cost of providing a vehicle to Manager and, at its discretion, provide an annual lump sum payment in lieu of providing Manager a City-owned vehicle. The lump sum payment shall be in an amount that is equivalent to the amount of expense reimbursement provided to other city managers in the general area to travel to and from work at their respective cities as determined by the Council. The amount as of the effective date of this agreement is $6,000. Manager shall be reimbursed for personal automobile use for trips, meetings, work, and other use related to his employment (other than travel to and from home) at the rate consistent with Internal Revenue Service regulations. (c) Professional Membership Dues and Professional Subscriptions. City will pay the cost of membership in the International City/County Management Association, the Minnesota City/County Management Association, and like organizations and subscriptions to professional journals and publications. 4 BR291-431-994792.v1 (d) Participation in Professional Training/Development. City will pay the cost of Manager’s participation and attendance at the ICMA Annual Conference or similar national training opportunity, MCMA Annual conference, League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference and miscellaneous professional training programs offered within the State of Minnesota. 10. Expenses Incurred in Performing Duties. City shall reimburse or directly pay for actual expenses reasonably incurred by Manager that are directly related to performing Manager’s duties, including lodging following late or early City business. The parties contemplate Manager will incur expenses for travel, attendance at meetings, etc. 11. Retirement Benefits. City shall pay the employer’s portion of the Minnesota Public Employment Retirement Association contribution on Manager’s salary. Manager shall, in addition to the retirement benefits provided above, be allowed to participate, at Manager’s own expense, in IRS approved deferred compensation plans offered through City. 12. Discontinuance of Employment Relationship. Manager serves at the pleasure of the Council and is removable at the will of the Council, subject only to the limitations imposed by the City Charter (Section 6.01). Understanding Manager serves as the chief administrative official for City and Manager’s employment status can be affected by political influences that are independent of job performance, the parties wish to make arrangements that reflect the realities of the marketplace and are necessary to recruit qualified persons. The parties wish to assure flexibility for Council, while providing for the ability of Manager to perform Manager’s duties without undue concern for Manager’s financial security should the need arise to seek new employment. Therefore, the parties have made concessions and Manager, as part of Manager’s compensation agreement, has made concessions in the amount of salary and other forms of compensation in return for the covenants contained in this section relating to the discontinuance of the employment relationship. (a) Manager to Provide Notice. Manager shall give City 30 days’ notice prior to discontinuing Manager’s employment, where there has been no event constituting an involuntary separation as hereinafter set forth. The parties may mutually agree to waive such notice requirement. (b) Option to Resign. If Council proposes or acts on the “involuntary separation” of Manager, Manager may choose to resign immediately before the proposed action or, if the Council acts on the “involuntary separation” and sets a later effective date, prior to the effective date of such termination. Nothing in this section limits the ability of the Council to act immediately to remove the Manager. (c) Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “involuntary separation” shall mean a formal request adopted at a public meeting by Council that Manager resign or an action adopted by Council terminating this Agreement. The term “involuntary separation” shall also mean the resignation of Manager within 30 days of the occurrence of any of the following: 5 BR291-431-994792.v1 (1) A change in the form of government at City due to the adoption, amendment or repeal of a home rule charter, election to adopt or repeal a particular statutory form of government (other than for a Plan B statutory form of government), or an ordinance/resolution changing City’s organizational structure that diminishes or reassigns Manager’s authority; or (2) A fundamental change in the duties and authority of Manager adopted by Council, by special or general election, or by referendum or initiative such that City’s status as a council-manager plan city is changed to some status other than a council- manager form of government. (d) Payment upon Involuntary Separation. In the event of an involuntary separation, whether through resignation by Manager or termination by Council, Manager shall be entitled to the benefits and payments set out in this paragraph: (1) Accrued Benefits. Payment of all accrued vacation and sick leave at its full value at Manager’s current rate of pay and in accordance with City’s personnel policy. (2) Health Insurance. Payment by City of the full cost of family health insurance, at level of coverage in effect just prior to the involuntary separation for a period of nine full months from the date such involuntary separation becomes effective. In addition, Manager shall be entitled, at Manager’s own cost to continue participation in City’s group insurance plans for at least 18 months after City is no longer required to make full payment of premiums for Manager’s insurance coverage, provided City’s group insurance plan authorizes such continued participation. (3) Severance Payment. Manager shall receive severance benefits in the amount equal to six months gross salary. (4) Time of payment. All payments due under this paragraph shall be paid within 14 days after the involuntary separation becomes effective. (5) Termination for Cause. If Manager is terminated by Council for substantiated and proven malfeasance in office, or intentional misconduct, the City shall have no obligation to pay or provide benefits or severances payment listed in parts (1) through (3) of this paragraph, except to the extent specifically required by law. “Intentional misconduct” is defined as substantiated and proven sexual, racial or other unlawful harassment, distribution of pornography, acts of physical violence in the workplace, theft or conversion of City property or funds, willful and repeated neglect of duties, or conviction of a felony. “Intentional misconduct” and “malfeasance” as used in this paragraph do not include poor performance or general neglect of duties. (e) Payment Upon Voluntary Termination. Upon Manager’s voluntary termination of employment, Manager shall be entitled to full payment by the next following pay period of: 6 BR291-431-994792.v1 (1) Payment of all accrued vacation and sick leave at its full value at the Manager’s current rate of pay and in accordance with the City’s personnel policy. (2) Payment of all wages for days worked since the last payroll period prior to separation. (f) No Waiver. Nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver of any rights or claims that either party may have beyond the compensation due in the normal course of the separation of the Manager from the City’s employ. 13. City’s Personnel Policy. Any employment matter not addressed by this Agreement shall be determined in accordance with the City’s personnel policy, provided such determination does not conflict with an express provision of this Agreement. 14. Indemnification. City shall defend and indemnify Manager pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 466.07 and 465.76 as required by law. City shall also defend and hold harmless and indemnify Manager from all torts, civil damages, penalties, fines, provided the Manager was acting within the course and scope of Manager’s duties and is not charged with a crime. 15. Merger. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written communications between the parties. 16. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the employment relationship between City and Manager, and the parties agree that there were no inducements or representations leading to the execution of this Agreement except as herein contained. The current agreement between the parties designating the Manager the Acting City Manager is terminated as of the Effective Date of this Agreement. 17. Severability. In case any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement shall be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions contained in this Agreement will not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. 18. Governing Law. This Agreement will be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 19. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in two or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which together will be constitute one and the same instrument. 7 BR291-431-994792.v1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. By Mayor City Manager