Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025.01.13 CCP REGULARCITY COUNCIL MEETING City Hall Council Chambers January 13, 2025 AGENDA 1. Call to Order - 7:00 p.m. Attendees please turn off cell phones and pages during the meeting. A copy of the full meeting packet is available in the binder at the entrance to the Council Chambers. 2. Swearing-In of City Council Members a. Council Member Kris Lawrence-Anderson b. Council Member Laurie Ann Moore 3. Roll Call 4. Pledge of Allegiance 5. Informal Open Forum This is an opportunity for the public to address the City Council on items that are not on the agenda. It is limited to 15 minutes. It may not be used to make personal attacks, air personal grievances, make political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with the presenter. Questions from the Council will be for clarification purposes only. It will not be used as a time for problem- solving or reacting to the comments made but for hearing the presenter for informational purposes only. The first call will be for those that have notified the Clerk that they would like to speak during the open forum and then ask if anyone connected to this meeting would like to speak. When called upon, please indicate your name and then proceed. Please be sure to state your name before speaking. a. Meeting Decorum 6. Invocation - Graves 7. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda These items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There isn't a separate discussion for these items unless a Councilmember so requests, then it is moved to the end of the Council Consideration Items. a. Approval of Minutes b. Approval of Licenses c. Resolution Designating Official Newspaper for 2025 d. Resolution Appointing Mayor Pro Tem and President Pro Tem for 2025 e. Resolution Declaring Commitment to the Brooklyn Center City Charter for 2025 Page 1 of 155 f. Resolution Recognizing the Contributions of Ethnic Populations and Heritage Celebrations for 2025 g. Resolution Designating the Depositories for City Funds for 2025 h. Resolution Opting Not to Waive Limited Tort Liability for 2025 i. Resolution Granting Corporate Authority for Signing of Checks and Transactions of Financial Business Matters for 2025 j. Resolution Appointing Council Members to Commissions and Outside Organizations for 2025 k. Resolution Appointing Brooklyn Center Representatives to the Executive Committee and/or Board of Directors of the Brooklyn Bridge Alliance for Youth, Hennepin Recycling Group, Local Government Information Systems (LOGIS), Northwest Tourism, North Metro Mayors Association, Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission, Pets Under Police Security (PUPS), and Twin Lake Joint Powers Organization l. Resolution Appointing Municipal Trustees to the Brooklyn Center Fire Relief Association Board of Trustees m. Resolution Approving the 2025 Fee Schedule n. Resolution Affirming Acceptance of Minnesota Department of Transportation Grant Funds o. Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids, Improvement Project No. 2025-02, 67th Avenue and James Avenue Mill & Overlay p. Resolution Accepting Work Performed and Authorizing Final Payment, Improvement Project Nos. 2023-04 and 05, 2023 Trail and Parking Lot Improvements q. Appointments to the Shingle Creek/West Mississippi Watershed District r. Resolution Acknowledging Awarded Funds for the Hennepin County Youth Activities Grant and Authorizing Acceptance of Grant Funds s. Resolution Acknowledging Awarded funds from the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Foundation and Authorizing Acceptance and Execution of Grant Funds for a 2025 Community Open House t. Resolution Accepting Additional Grant Funding for an Additional Intensive Comprehensive Peace Officer Education & Training (ICPOET) Position 8. Presentations/Proclamations/Recognitions/Donations a. Minneapolis Northwest Tourism Annual Report 9. Public Hearings Page 2 of 155 a. Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Improvement Project No. 2025- 02, 67th Avenue and James Avenue Mill & Overlay to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls 10. Planning Commission Items 11. Council Consideration Items a. Consideration of Appointments to City Commissions 12. Council Report 13. Adjournment Page 3 of 155 COUNCIL MEETING DECORUM To ensure meetings are conducted in a professional and courteous manner which enables the orderly conduct of business, all persons in attendance or who participate in such meetings shall conduct themselves in a manner that does not interfere with the ability of others to observe and, when allowed, to participate without disruption or fear of intimidation. A. Decorum. Persons who attend meetings must avoid conduct that disrupts, interferes with, or disturbs the orderly conduct of the meeting or the ability of other attendees to observe and participate as appropriate. To that end, persons who attend meetings are subject to the following: (1) Members of the public may only speak during meetings when allowed under Council Rules and only after being recognized by the presiding officer. The presiding officer may establish time limits for the acceptance of public comments or testimony. (2) Public comments or testimony must be addressed to the presiding officer and not to other Council Members, staff, or others in attendance. (3) All elected officials shall be referred to by their proper title and surname. (4) Public comments should avoid personal accusations, profanity, or other improper content for a public meeting. (5) Intimidating behaviors, threats of hostility, or actual violence are disallowed. (6) Audible demonstrations intended to disrupt the meeting should be avoided, including stomping of feet, snapping of fingers, clapping of hands, and other conduct that may be intimidating or threatening to others. (7) Holding, displaying, or placing banners, signs, objects, or other materials in any way that endangers others, prevents the free flow of individuals within the chamber, or obstructs or prevents the viewing of the meeting by others is not allowed. B. The presiding officer shall request any person(s) who disrupt, interfere with or disturb the orderly conduct of a meeting to cease the conduct and, as necessary, shall issue an oral warning to the individual(s) found to be in violation. If the individual(s) persists in disrupting, interfering with, or disturbing the meeting, the presiding officer may have the individual(s) removed or, under appropriate circumstances, temporarily clear the gallery. If for any reason the presiding officer fails to take such action, a majority vote may be substituted for action by the presiding officer to maintain order and decorum over the proceedings. C. The Council Chambers capacity is 76 persons per fire code. Page 4 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Barb Suciu, City Clerk THROUGH: Reggie Edwards, City Manager BY: Shannon Pettit, Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve meeting minutes • December 9, 2024, Study Session • December 9, 2024, Regular Session • December 19, 2024, Special Council Meeting Background: In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 15.17, the official records of all meetings must be documented and approved by the governing body. Budget Issues: - None Inclusive Community Engagement: - None Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: - None Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2024.12.09 Study Session 2. 2024.12.09 Regular Session 3. 2024.12.19 Special Session Page 5 of 155 12/9/24 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION DECEMBER 9, 2024 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session called to order by Mayor April Graves at 6:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor April Graves and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, Dan Jerzak, and Teneshia Kragness. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk Barb Suciu, and City Attorney Jason Hill. CITY COUNCIL MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION ITEMS Councilmember Jerzak noted he would like for Consent Agenda Item 6e. Resolution Adopting a City Council Code of Conduct and Ethics be moved to allow for discussion. The previous minutes allude to Mayor Graves’ preference for further discussion as well. Finally, Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson was unavailable to participate in the previous discussion on the topic. Mayor Graves confirmed Consent Agenda Item 6e. Resolution Adopting a City Council Code of Conduct and Ethics would become Council Consideration Item 10b. Resolution Adopting a City Council Code of Conduct and Ethics. Councilmember Jerzak added he would like Consent Agenda Item 6f. 2025 Brooklyn Center Legislative Priorities to be discussed. There was a canceled Council meeting, and there hasn’t been sufficient discussion. There is also an error in the document which requires review. Councilmember Jerzak stated he would like to recognize the brave men and women who handled the dangerous, difficult situation over the weekend. He requested the Council join him in the recognition. Councilmember Butler noted her appreciation of how the incident was handled. Mayor Graves agreed with the comments. Councilmember Jerzak asked for clarification regarding Council Consideration Item 10a. Brooklyn Center Community Safety Violence Prevention Commission. The item states that the staff requested the Council “to enable the resolution,” but no resolution was provided. He asked if a final draft of the resolution was provided to Council. City Manager Reggie Edwards stated the resolution was not included in the packet, but it will be made available to the Council during the presentation. Page 6 of 155 12/9/24 -2- DRAFT Councilmember Jerzak explained transparency is important. He requested the Council consider pushing back the item to allow for a review of the document and public notice. Dr. Edwards stated a resolution doesn’t have any legal obligation to provide notice, and the documents are available to the public. Councilmember Jerzak asked when the document was made available to the public. Dr. Edwards stated there was an administrative error where the resolution was marked as private when the packet was sent out. It will be provided during the presentation. Councilmember Jerzak pointed out there was previous consensus to refine and discuss the entirety of the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Act. Also, there was an administrative error that inhibited the document’s release. Mayor Graves stated she would like the item to remain on the agenda. After the presentation, the Council has the option to table the resolution if they are not comfortable voting on it. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson pointed out she has asked to review the entire document consistently over the past two years. The fifth item in the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock- Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Act hasn’t been thoroughly discussed. She stated she would also like to table the item. Mayor Graves stated the presentation may address some of her concerns. Also, there will be time for discussion after the presentation. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson reiterated she has asked to review the entire document consistently over the past two years. The discussion hasn’t taken place, and the sudden request to approve the document at the final meeting of the year is concerning. Mayor Graves noted there has been discussion of an advisory committee long before the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Act was passed. Director of Community Prevention, Health and Safety LaToya Turk even presented information that had been provided to the Council years prior by a Brooklyn Center Police Department Commander. Mayor Graves stated she would rather continue the dialogue and receive the presentation rather than tabling it completely. Councilmember Jerzak stated the timing of the item is concerning as it is the final meeting of the year, and the other discussion hasn’t been completed. Mayor Graves noted continuing the conversation is important, but the Council doesn’t need to vote on it after they receive the presentation and discuss it. Councilmember Jerzak pointed out he has been asking to review the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Act for a long time. Mayor Graves stated the presentation and subsequent discussion of the resolution regarding the Community Safety and Violence Prevention Commission is part of the Council’s desire to review the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Act. Page 7 of 155 12/9/24 -3- DRAFT It was the consensus of the Council to keep the Council Consideration Item 10a. Brooklyn Center Community Safety Violence Prevention Commission. Mayor Graves stated she needs to assign some Liaison positions and Mayor Pro Tem for 2025. She asked if the Council had any input. Councilmember Kragness stated she would like to remain with the Financial Commission. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she would like to remain with the Housing Commission. Councilmember Jerzak offered to stay on the Hwy 252 Task Force and to return to the Crime Prevention Committee. Mayor Graves added she planned to make Councilmember Kragness Mayor Pro Tem for 2025. Mayor Graves noted she would be out of town for a few days to attend a conference in Los Angeles and to visit her son. Councilmember Butler pointed out Wangstad Commons will be hosting a ribbon-cutting ceremony on Thursday, December 12, 2024. Mayor Graves added the Hmong New Year Celebration will be hosted at the Community Center. However, there is some conflicting information on the details of the event. Assistant City Manager/City Clerk Barb Suciu confirmed she would put the items on the Council calendar. Mayor Graves clarified the Hmong New Year Celebration will be at Brooklyn Park’s Community Center. DISCUSSION ON STUDY SESSION PROCEDURES Dr. Edwards noted the format of the Study Session was created on a trial basis to allow for more organic conversations. There was some input from Staff to request the Study Session be held from 6:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. to allow for a Work Session from 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. However, the length of time needed for the Study Session varies. It is challenging to schedule speakers for Work Session topics due to the late hour. Mayor Graves stated she does move to Work Session items if time allows. Overall, she doesn’t feel the Study Session meeting has changed too much. Councilmember Kragness noted she supports the current setup of the Study Session and how Mayor Graves runs the meeting. Councilmember Jerzak agreed with Councilmember Kragness. Page 8 of 155 12/9/24 -4- DRAFT Councilmember Jerzak pointed out the Engineering Department’s recent project came in under budget. The project is being approved on the Consent Agenda. He thanked Staff for their hard work. It was the consensus of the Council to continue the Study Session format. CITY MANAGER MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION ITEMS 2025 BUDGET DEBRIEF City Manager Reggie Edwards stated Staff would like to establish a process to debrief after budgeting. They want to ensure the budget discussion’s timeline is appropriate, the priorities of the Council are being met, and for the Council to be prepared to make an informed decision. Councilmember Kragness stated she appreciated the latest format to discuss the budget. However, they could have benefited from an additional meeting. She added that regular presentations from Departments are beneficial. Mayor Graves agreed with Councilmember Kragness. Councilmember Jerzak agreed with Councilmember Kragness’ comments. An additional meeting could have supported more discussion on the levy percentages. Dr. Edwards pointed out Staff is also working to reflect on the budgeting process. Staff also has an interest in an opportunity to reinform Council of updates made based on Council feedback. Mayor Graves stated Council would be interested in the information on the back end of the budget process. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson noted not all of the budget items have been discussed, yet the budget and levy have passed. That cannot happen again. Dr. Edwards stated all budget items have been presented to the Council. The item that hasn’t been presented is regarding utility rates, and it is on the agenda for that meeting. Councilmember Jerzak suggested the timing of Staff’s presentation regarding surprising items could be planned more effectively to elicit a better response from Council. Mayor Graves pointed out the audit was received later than the Council was preferred for the last two years. COMMISSION APPLICATIONS AND PROCESS Dr. Edwards stated engagement was an issue when he started working at Brooklyn Center. However, it is a value of Brooklyn Center to create an inclusive community. The Commissions are an effort to promote inclusivity. Additionally, the Commissions are an opportunity for the Council to receive input from the community. Unfortunately, some of the Commissions have not been meeting quorum and, thus, have not fulfilled those goals. Dr. Edwards pointed out the Page 9 of 155 12/9/24 -5- DRAFT Commissions have been rather homogenous in the past. They hope to promote engagement, retention, and inclusivity throughout the Commissions. Mayor Graves stated Staff and Council should be marketing Commissions on a regular basis at community events. The work the City has done with Brooklyn Bridge Alliance for Youth could help grow Commissions as well. Councilmember Kragness stated she looked forward to the annual Commissioner luncheon when she served on the Financial Commission. Presentations to the Council by Commissioners would also be beneficial to promote communication between bodies and to empower Commissioners. Mayor Graves agreed the joint Commission meetings are beneficial. However, other community partnerships weren’t invited. Dr. Edwards noted Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson has also expressed interest in joint gatherings. Councilmember Butler stated CAPI, CEAP, Brooklyn Center schools, and other local organizations host events, and the City should be present at said events to promote Commissions and other engagement opportunities. As for vacancies, she asked if it would make sense to combine Commission meetings if there is some similarity. For example, the Housing Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission could share a meeting. Councilmember Jerzak pointed out BrookLynk did a Council “takeover” that the youth enjoyed. Youth in City Government is another opportunity to get young people involved. He asked if the water bills can notify residents of Commission openings. Councilmember Kragness noted she had a conversation with the Mayor during her time at the Financial Commission. It was a thorough discussion to show how serious she was about the role and to share her skills. Mayor Graves stated she and Ms. Suciu have made some phone calls. However, it would be a great way for the Council Liaisons to assist in the process. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson suggested Commission applicants be required or strongly encouraged to attend a meeting of the Commission they want to be a part of. It shows a higher level of commitment and also educates the applicant. Mayor Graves agreed that attendance at a meeting should be strongly encouraged. Mayor Graves added the application itself could be refined to allow applicants to fully express their interest and what they would offer a Commission. The accessibility of the application must also be considered. Ms. Suciu noted the application is on the City website and is available in any language. Mayor Graves requested physical copies of the application in multiple languages be made available to the Council. Councilmember Kragness noted the community is interested in seeing past Commission minutes online, and it would help to inform potential applicants about what the Commission does. Page 10 of 155 12/9/24 -6- DRAFT Councilmember Jerzak suggested the openings be included on the City’s digital signs. Councilmember Butler pointed out the Parks and Recreation Commission’s minutes are not available online. Mayor Graves asked if there is a time frame that minutes are required to be posted. Ms. Suciu stated the minutes should be posted once they are approved. However, liaisons may not be posting the minutes separately from the agenda once they are approved. Dr. Edwards asked for more ideas to promote engagement, retention, and inclusivity throughout the Commissions. Mayor Graves pointed out that many of the suggestions would address engagement and inclusivity. Mayor Graves suggested Staff could encourage current Commissioners to help with recruitment as part of their meeting agenda. Personal invitations can go a long way. The City isn’t in a position to provide a stipend for attendance. However, providing snacks or beverages is enticing. Councilmember Butler noted gauging the preferences of meeting times of interested applicants. She requested Staff figure out why Commissioners aren’t attending or staying involved. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated the appreciation luncheon used to be in April. The gesture is simple but well-received. It is an opportunity for the Council to meet Commissioners. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Graves closed the Study Session at 7:02 p.m. Page 11 of 155 12/9/24 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION DECEMBER 9, 2024 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor April Graves at 7:03 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Mayor April Graves and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, Dan Jerzak, and Teneshia Kragness. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards, Parks and Recreation Director Cordell Wiseman, Director of Fiscal & Support Services Angela Holm, Director of Community Prevention, Health and Safety LaToya Turk, Planner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk Barb Suciu, and City Attorney Siobhan Tolar. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 4. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM Mayor April Graves opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum and reviewed the rules of Decorum. She pointed out the rule disallowing public comments on agenda items is waived for comments regarding the resolution thanking Councilmember Butler for her service. Nahid K. thanked Councilmember Butler for her eight years of service. Julie B. thanked Councilmember Butler for her time and support. She will be sorely missed. She has done a lot to promote equity in Brooklyn Center. Councilmember Butler has also been kind to Julie B.’s daughter and made an impact in her life. Mayor Graves pointed out that the Code of Conduct cannot be addressed during the Open Forum because it is an agenda item. Pam S. introduced herself as Councilmember Butler’s proud mom. Councilmember Butler has experienced hatred, death threats, and other negative things as a Councilmember. However, she can hold her head high knowing she made a positive impact on Brooklyn Center. Page 12 of 155 12/9/24 -2- DRAFT Abdul O. shared his experience of campaigning for Councilmember Butler and pointed out she has made a significant impact on the community due to her service. Lori B. stated words cannot express her thankfulness for Councilmember Butler. Former Mayor Elliott stated Councilmember Butler has been a leading voice promoting change and dignity in the community. She has an unwavering commitment to social justice and is a compassionate leader. She has led with a deep sense of purpose and humanity. Her contributions to Brooklyn Center have been transformative. Elizer D. stated it has been an honor to witness Councilmember Butler’s leadership at the local, State, and National levels. She is level-headed, calm, and resolute. Her leadership style is inspiring. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded to close the Informal Open Forum at 7:25 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 5. INVOCATION Councilmember Butler shared a quote from Coretta Scott King, “The greatness of a community is most accurately measured by the compassionate actions of its members.” 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Graves pointed out Consent Agenda Item 6e. Resolution Adopting a City Council Code of Conduct and Ethics would become Council Consideration Item 10b. Resolution Adopting a City Council Code of Conduct and Ethics and Consent Agenda Item 6f. 2025 Brooklyn Center Legislative Priorities would become Council Consideration Item 10c. 2025 Brooklyn Center Legislative Priorities. Councilmember Butler moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda, as amended, and the following consent items were approved: 6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. October 28, 2024 – Study Session 2. November 25, 2024 – Study Session 3. November 25, 2024 – Regular Session 4. November 25, 2024 – Work/EDA Session 6b. LICENSES GASOLINE SERVICE STATION Brooklyn BP 6044 Brooklyn Boulevard Page 13 of 155 12/9/24 -3- DRAFT Brooklyn Center Municipal Garage 6844 Shingle Creek Parkway Pump & Munch 1505 69th Avenue N MECHANICAL Midwest Maintenance & Mech. 750 Pennsylvania Avenue S Golden Valley 55426 4front Energy 3230 Gorham Avenue Suite 1 St. Louis Park 55426 ON-SALE INTOXICATING Dos Hermanos II 1400 Shingle Creek Crossing Embassy Suites 6300 Earle Brown Drive ON-SALE SUNDAY Dos Hermanos II 1400 Shingle Creek Crossing Embassy Suites 6300 Earle Brown Drive OFF-SALE 3.2 MALT LIQUOR Pump & Munch 1505 69th Avenue N RENTAL INITIAL (TYPE IV – six-month license) 5818 Emerson Avenue N Quality Residences/danmark Properties, Llc INITIAL (TYPE II – two-year license) 6331 Beard Avenue N 6401 Beard LLC 4201 Lakeside Avenue N #113 Meoldy Hanna 7211 Camden Avenue N YUNUS KATUNDU/JASMINE BLAIR RENEWAL (TYPE IV – six-month license) 5712 Logan Avenue N Ali Mir 2118 Ericon Drive Marco Panora 3501 47th Avenue N 6939 Baird Llc 7013 Fremont Avenue N Ih2 Property Illinois Lp 4900 Zenith Avenue N Ih2 Property Illinois Lp Page 14 of 155 12/9/24 -4- DRAFT 7131 Indiana Avenue N Jeremy Paskewich 6710 Orchard Lane Marvin Gardens Townhomes Lp 1900 Brookview Drive Ih3 Property Minnesota Lp 6740 Grimes Place Victoria Townhouses 1 5260 Twin Lake Boulevard E HERON VERDE LLC RENEWAL (TYPE II – two-year license) 5535 Colfax Avenue N Christopher Nicholls 1100 69th Avenue N TYLER NASH 5411 72nd Circle Maya Ly RENEWAL (TYPE I – three-year license) 1507 Humboldt Place N Kyan (Jimmy) Hui 1113 73rd Avenue N Mary Carroll 5001 Ewing Avenue N Bartholomew F Dabrowski 3000 62nd Avenue N Daniel L & Susan C Soffa Trs 5713 Humboldt Avenue N Janice Biorn TOBACCO Holiday Stationstore #2099 6890 Shingle Creek Parkway Sun Foods, Inc. 6350 Brooklyn Boulevard Quick Shop 5808 Xerxes Avenue N Van's Automotive 6840 Humboldt Avenue N Pump & Munch 1505 69th Avenue N Walgreens 6390 Brooklyn Boulevard 6c. RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NOS. 1-4, ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT, PROJECT NO. 2024-07, LIFT STATION NO. 5 REHABILITATION PROJECT Page 15 of 155 12/9/24 -5- DRAFT 6d. RESOLUTION SETTING EMPLOYER BENEFITS CONTRIBUTION FOR FULL-TIME NON-UNION EMPLOYEES FOR 2025, 2026, AND 2027 6e. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A CITY COUNCIL CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS This item was removed from the Consent Agenda and was addressed during Council Consideration Items. 6f. 2025 BROOKLYN CENTER LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES This item was removed from the Consent Agenda and was addressed during Council Consideration Items. 6g. APPROVE THE 2025 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE Motion passed unanimously. 7. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS 7a. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING COUNCIL MEMBER MARQUITA BUTLER FOR HER YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Councilmember Butler read a letter she wrote. She thanked her support system for their consistency throughout her time on Council. She thanked her son and her parents for his unwavering support. Brooklyn Center has experienced some groundbreaking moments, especially over the past four years. She encouraged the Council to continue making big changes and thanked them for their service. Councilmember Butler noted she is proud of pushing for improved community engagement, challenging Staff to be engaging and expansive, promoting City cleanliness, and questioning systems. She thanked Staff for their work to promote the City. Councilmember Butler encouraged the Council to consider those with different backgrounds and perspectives than themselves, seek innovative solutions, celebrate those who are involved in the City, and speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves. She stated she hopes Brooklyn Center is better than it was eight years ago due to the work of the Council. Mayor Graves stated she is sad to see Councilmember Butler leave. Prior to Councilmember Butler joining the Council, Mayor Graves was only the second woman of color to serve on the Council. Councilmember Butler’s presence and work has encouraged Mayor Graves to continue showing up even when circumstances were hard. Mayor Graves read a resolution recognizing Council Member Marquita Butler for her years of service to the City of Brooklyn Center. Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2024-131 recognizing Council Member Marquita Butler for her years of Page 16 of 155 12/9/24 -6- DRAFT service to the City of Brooklyn Center. Motion passed unanimously. 7b. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE SERVICE OF ARVID "BUD" SORENSON ON THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Mayor Graves read in full a Proclamation expressing recognition and appreciation to Arvid "Bud" Sorenson for 45 years of dedicated service as a City of Brooklyn Center Parks and Recreation Commission Member. Arvid "Bud" Sorenson stated he served the community because he wanted to impact change. He thanked his community for the support and pointed out he and his wife will be celebrating their 60th anniversary in August. It is time for a younger voice to take his spot. Mayor Graves noted Mr. Sorenson is welcoming and respectful of different ideas. His service on the Commission has been powerful. Councilmember Butler thanked Mr. Sorenson for his commitment to the City, attention to detail, and willingness to ask questions. Councilmember Jerzak agreed Mr. Sorenson is organized and meticulous. His long-term dedication is unheard of. Councilmember Kragness noted Mr. Sorenson regularly receives recognition for his kind acts throughout the community which shows his character beyond the Commission service. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson thanked Mr. Sorenson for his service. Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to adopt a RESOLUTION NO. 2024-132 expressing recognition and appreciation to Arvid "Bud" Sorenson for 45 years of dedicated service as a City of Brooklyn Center Parks and Recreation Commission Member. Motion passed unanimously. 7c. RANDOM ACTS OF KINDNESS Mayor Graves read in full a Proclamation declaring November 12, 2024, to be Designated as Random Acts of Kindness Day. Councilmember Kragness moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to adopt Proclimation declaring November 12, 2024, to be Designated as Random Acts of Kindness Day. Motion passed unanimously. Page 17 of 155 12/9/24 -7- DRAFT Mayor Graves read the list of nominees: BKBM Engineers, TopGolf, Luther of Brookdale, Friends of Palmer Lake, Rob and Debbie Pain, Dan Do, Roberta Branson, Jeff and Julie Banshee, Rita Ascher, Raven Robinson, the Organization of Liberian Women in MN, Diane Sannes, Brooklyn Center Lions Club, Brooklyn Center Lady Lions Club, Kids on Move Daycare, Ashlee and Sharon Kepheart, Jack MacMillan and Jill Dalton, Hennepin Tech Photosynthesizers Club, Brooklyn Center Rotary Club, Tony Trice, Shawn Evers, Kimoyda Yaya Cochran, Beverly Truran, Stacy Johnson and Laurie Aziz, Kathie LeRoy, Amanda Engle, Rick Nordstrom, Jill White, Susan Crumptin, Minneapolis Elks Lodge #44, Matt Horwath, Wilson Sr., Wilson Jr., Maria, Nancee, and Jose Mendez, Tessa Gedatus, Jeff Bradley, Allan and Darnell Hancock, Daryll Sannes, Anas Hassan, Sandy Becker, Erwin Heisler, Barb Sorenson, Living Christ’s Mission Church, Brookdale United Methodist Church, and Brookdale Covenant Church. Mayor Graves thanked the nominees for their contributions to the Brooklyn Center community. 7d. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT UPDATE City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited Parks and Recreation Director Cordell Wiseman to make the Staff presentation. Parks and Recreation Director Cordell Wiseman pointed out the mission of the Parks and Recreation Department is to enhance the quality of life for the community by providing diverse, accessible and inclusive opportunities. The ultimate goal of the Department is to create a thriving, vibrant community where people of all ages and backgrounds can connect, grow, and enjoy enriching experiences. Mr. Wiseman stated there are three units within the Department. There is the General Fund which is the Community Center, Special Revenue which is the Centerbrook Golf Course, and the Enterprise Fund which is the Heritage Center. Mr. Wiseman noted that the staff within his department are some of the best people he has ever worked with. Golf Course Superintendent Steve Makowske, Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation Clarissa Goebel, Sales Director Tami Buetow-Staples, and Outreach Manager Charles Walker were present to participate in the presentation. Mr. Wiseman explained the Centerbook Golf Course currently has one Superintendent and 10 part- time seasonal Staff. There will be one more full-time person added in 2025. They plan to extend their hours, and they are open every day during the golf season. He showed a table summarizing the expenses, revenues, and net income. 2021 was the first time in about 12 years that the Golf Course had a positive net income. In 2021 and 2022, there was a transfer of $85,000. In 2023, the transfer was lowered to $80,000. The 2024 transfer of $80,000 was not included in the table. Based on the trends, they anticipate a net loss for 2025. However, the end of 2026 is projected to be a net operating income. Golf Course Superintendent Steve Makowske explained the golf industry rests entirely on weather. Staff plans to continue to deliver a high quality of service through golfing opportunities and Page 18 of 155 12/9/24 -8- DRAFT programming. By adjusting the programming model, revenue has increased each month since 2012. Local schools cut the golf programs, but he is working to restore the team. In the past, the venue captured $1,500 in additional revenue. From the Juneteenth Golf event, the Course captured $1,600 in additional revenue. Guest Days have captured $1,100 in additional revenue and Lady’s Days have captured $900 in additional revenue. Lastly, Youth on Course, a national program in which Brooklyn Center was an early participant, allowed the Course to capture an additional $3,500. Mr. Wiseman noted by opening up the golf course for winter programming and opportunities, Staff projects additional revenue. An example is hosting weddings and events over the winter months. It will also provide affordable rental opportunities for Brooklyn Center residents and businesses. Staff estimates hosting 15 events in the first year, which could bring in $12,000 in room rental revenue. Also in 2025, there will be new simulators. Projections anticipate the first year's revenue to be approximately $88,000. The upgrades to Lions Park will also promote the use of Centerbrook Golf Course. Mr. Wiseman stated the Heritage Center had 23 full-time equivalent positions while 2024 and 2025 had 22. The Heritage Center consists of three business units: Convention Center, Catering Operations, and Office Rentals. He showed a table of expenses, revenues, and net income since 2020. The net income continues to be in the red, though it is getting closer to zero each year. Based on the trending numbers, Staff anticipates that the net loss will be reduced by the end of 2024. By the end of 2026, there should be a net operating income. Sales Director Tami Buetow-Staples explained that Heritage Center plans to continue to deliver a high quality of service and maintain a 90 percent repeat client rate through ongoing customer satisfaction. All room rental fees were increased and contracts will include a room rental fee moving forward. In 2023, the room rental revenue was $494,195. For 2024, the projected room rental revenue will be $749,000, and 2025 will likely see another ten percent increase. Also, the menu pricing increased by around six percent to stay on pace with competitors and make up for inflation. Ms. Tami Buetow-Staples added a marketing company was hired to promote the Heritage Center and drive more leads. Overall, there has been an increase in leads, site visits, and contracts while decreasing monthly marketing fees. In 2025, the Heritage Center’s agenda will be rich with community-centric events, as current planning efforts are diligently underway, taking into account both budget constraints and event space availability. Mr. Wiseman pointed out many requests were made of him such as accessibility and diversity. There will be a new catering contract as of January 1, 2025. It is a gross profit share contract that will help to lower the Heritage Center’s catering expenses and meet the community’s needs in terms of pricing. Mr. Wiseman stated that in 2025, there are plans to remodel the D-Barn into a rentable space. This will help generate additional revenue. It will also provide affordable rental opportunities for Brooklyn Center residents and businesses. Over 100 leads each year due to lack of affordability. Page 19 of 155 12/9/24 -9- DRAFT They projected one-fourth of the leads could be captured with the remodeled D-Barn. The additional leads would generate close to $62,000. He noted the new catering contract would allow an external licensed caterer to be used for the D-Barn. Mr. Wiseman added there are plans to offer events sponsored by the Heritage Center. By planning and operating their own events, revenue opportunities will be maximized. They are planning a Valentine’s Dinner Event, and they hope to sell 700 tickets and bring in $56,000 in additional revenue with minimal costs to the venue. Mr. Wiseman noted the ongoing efforts to boost revenue is crucial in ensuring the Heritage Center’s financial sustainability. Mr. Wiseman explained when he started working in Brooklyn Center, an immediate need was to address membership for residents, youth sports, and building community pride. There have also been ongoing concerns about safety and gathering in parks. The budget was restructured to address issues in the parks. Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation Clarissa Goebel showed a chart with Staffing levels for the Parks and Recreation Department. There were 30 full-time equivalent positions in 2024, and there will be 28 in 2025 due to restructuring. Ms. Goebel pointed out a resident rate was added which has increased the number of resident memberships and the overall revenue. The new rate has made the Community Center more accessible without driving away non-resident members. Ms. Goebel noted the aquatics Staff have worked to increase accessibility to the pool, especially for people of color. Brooklyn Center co-hosted the World’s Largest Swim Lesson with Brooklyn Park. It was a free swimming lesson to offer a barrier-free way to introduce people of all ages to swimming. They hosted Sensory Swim on Sundays which is a quiet space for folks with sensory needs to enjoy. The Spooky Splash was a successful Halloween event, and there is a Winter Waterland event coming up. Mr. Wiseman added a new lift was added to the pool. Ms. Goebel stated the Community Center received a Local Food Purchase Assistance Grant. They partnered with local BIPOC farmers from Hamel, Ogilvie, and Otsego. From June through October, over 400 boxes of fresh produce were purchased and distributed to more than 2,500 people. Ms. Goebel added the Community Center also received a Northside Wellness Grant. They partnered with CAPI and Yoga Sanctuary to provide space for local BIPOC individuals who are training to become Yoga instructors. They offered two community events in February and May and two classes per week from June to November, one of which was a bilingual Spanish class. They hope to retain at least one instructor. Ms. Goebel explained Staff is really proud of their youth soccer programming and its growth. Before 2022, there was a six-week skill-building opportunity for kids ages 3 to 13. In 2022, an in- house league was formed and included 37 kids. In 2023, the league grew to 78 kids. In 2024, there were 100 kids, hired local coaches for a younger kids’ clinic instead of contracting, and added Page 20 of 155 12/9/24 -10- DRAFT goalie training. A grant from Luther Auto funds the high-quality Brooklyn Center jerseys. Also, a semi-professional team came to interact with players. Ms. Wiseman thanked the Staff member Patrick for his creativity and work to grow the youth soccer program. Ms. Goebel stated a Parks and Recreation Outreach Team was been enhanced and partners with public safety Staff from across the City. If law enforcement is too busy, they can call on the Outreach Team. First responders engage and interact with park users and permit holders. They also focus on relationship-building with youth, teens, residents, and organizations. There were three large, unpermitted teen gatherings in Brooklyn Center parks, and the Outreach Team has been available to respond to the events. Ms. Goebel explained the Outreach Team oversaw youth and teen outreach efforts from October through May open gym offerings. Thanks to partnerships with local schools, they host events on Mondays at Brooklyn Center Elementary, Wednesdays at Garden City, and Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays at the Blue Barn and Brooklyn Center Middle School and Brooklyn Center High School. The Aquatics Supervisor is also in local schools once per week to teach a class. Pop-up events including basketball and Trunk or Treat. She thanked the Staff for organizing the back-to-school event. Mr. Wiseman reiterated the importance and impact of the Parks and Recreation Department collaborating with various City entities and local groups. Mayor Graves agreed the partnerships have been extremely beneficial for the community. Mayor Graves pointed out Mr. Wiseman has done a lot to grow the Department in his short three years and honors Staff well. She has optimism for the impacts of Mr. Wiseman’s leadership in Brooklyn Center. Mayor Graves asked if the Outreach Team was cut from the budget. Mr. Wiseman explained there was a Supervisor and Manager position, but only one was ever filled. He eliminated the Supervisor position. Councilmember Kragness thanked Staff for the presentation. She stated the positive changes and plans implemented have been very successful in building both revenue and community. The change in revenue takes a lot of work. Mr. Wiseman pointed out the success of the Department is thanks to his Staff. Councilmember Butler thanked Staff for the presentation. The Department has dramatically improved its offerings. She asked if hosting weddings at Centerbrook would negatively affect the green. She also asked if the recycling bins in the parks are actually being recycled. Mr. Wiseman stated that weddings would be during the winter, so the green isn’t a concern. Ms. Goebel stated cross-contamination in the parks is a concern. Staff tries to recycle the contents of the bins, but if there are non-recyclable materials in a recycling bin, they must be thrown away. Page 21 of 155 12/9/24 -11- DRAFT The issue requires community education among other efforts, and there is not currently space in the recycling budget for such changes. Mayor Graves agreed there needs to be a larger marketing campaign to promote recycling. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson suggested there be signs added. Ms. Goebel stated the cans are labeled. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated a separate sign promoting recycling and community pride would be helpful in encouraging proper practices. Councilmember Jerzak asked if the golf simulators had been purchased already. Mr. Wiseman stated they hadn’t been purchased. Councilmember Jerzak asked if the $300,000 to remodel the D-Barn has been approved. Mr. Wiseman stated the new contract includes an agreement for the vendor to provide $300,000 to renovate the D-Barn. Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to approve the presentation. Motion passed unanimously. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8a. RESOLUTIONS TO APPROVE THE UTILITY RATES FOR 2025 City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited Director of Fiscal & Support Services Angela Holm to make the Staff presentation. Director of Fiscal & Support Services Angela Holm explained approving utility rates requires a public hearing. While considering the rate changes, the primary aim is to maintain service levels. Another consideration is to provide cash for operating needs, capital projects, and debt service. The 2025 proposed rates were included in the budget presentation on December 2, 2025. Staff completes a long-term analysis to promote stabilization of rate changes. Ms. Holm showed a table with 2025 proposed rate changes. Water rates would see a 25 percent increase, four percent increase for sanitary sewer, three percent increase for storm sewer, and 75 percent for recycling. The water increase is likely to be the most impactful on residents. The large increase in recycling rates is to better cover the contracted charges for the service. Ms. Holm showed a table with the proposed rate change’s impact on the average Brooklyn Center household. For the average user, folks would see a $22.80 increase in water costs, $4.33 for sanitary sewer, $0.78 for storm sewer, $1.47 for street lights, and $10.64 for recycling, which creates a total of $40.02. Page 22 of 155 12/9/24 -12- DRAFT Ms. Holm pointed out Staff considered how comparable cities fund infrastructure operations, maintenance, and replacement for large projects. They also looked into the infrastructure needs, replacement timing, and policies on funding mechanisms. Ms. Holm showed a graph comparing water utility rates with other cities. In 2024, Brooklyn Center had one of the lowest rates. The 2025 rates are unknown, but the 2025 cost would be in the middle of the 2024 rates. She showed the same graph for sanitary sewer, and Brooklyn Center is around the middle. Storm drainage utility rates are on the lower end for comparable cities. Lastly, she showed a graph comparing the total utility rates for comparison. In 2024, Brooklyn Center was the second lowest. Ms. Holm stated only a few cities charge for street lights. Brooklyn Center had an average rate in 2024. Similarly, not all cities charge for recycling. Brooklyn Center contracts with the same service as Crystal and New Hope. Crystal and New Hope have the same rate, but Brooklyn Center didn’t charge a high enough rate in 2024 due to an error in the billing process. The 2025 increase will make up for the lower 2024 recycling billing numbers. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked if there is a plan to address the broken water meters. The current situation is inequitable. Ms. Holm stated various Staff are collaborating to fix the meters. The meters reading zero are a priority. The meters with estimated reads are next in line for replacement. It is a large project, so it will take considerable time. However, the efforts are underway. Ms. Holm encouraged residents with a zero read to contact Staff to set up a time to fix the meters. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked if Staff expects residents to reach out. Ms. Holm stated she is cautiously optimistic. Councilmember Jerzak noted his appreciation of the plan. The Public Works Staff is already overworked, and now they are expected to fix around six meters per day until the approximately 400 meters are addressed. The audit showed a potential loss of $100,000. He asked if Council has considered bringing in an external contractor to fix the meters. Councilmember Jerzak added there are 886 delinquent accounts with around $900,000 in unpaid water bills. People cannot afford their utilities, and the proposed increase is concerning. The City has a number of folks on a fixed income. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked if residents would be more interested in receiving a monthly bill instead of a quarterly bill. She asked if such a change would be an administrative burden. Ms. Holm explained Staff has discussed changing the billing times. More people are moving to online billing which would make the administration easier. There hasn’t been a strong interest in moving to monthly billing. Councilmember Jerzak asked if there is a way to recover any funds from non-metered water usage. Ms. Holm confirmed there is not such an option. Page 23 of 155 12/9/24 -13- DRAFT Councilmember Jerzak stated it is concerning for the metered users to be paying for the non- metered users. Ms. Holm stated the new rates aren’t going to fix the issue of missing funds. However, the fixes for the meters will impact the funds down the line. Councilmember Butler moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Laurie M. pointed out Brooklyn Center adopted a 7.92 percent increase for property taxes though she implored the City to consider a lower rate. The vote was not resident-centered, particularly for folks on a fixed income. Laurie M. noted her appreciation for acknowledging the billing error that impacted future recycling rates. Laurie M. asked if a non-metered house can be charged a minimum rate. Laurie M. noted her support of a contracted service to address broken meters. Laurie M. stated the City is not collecting franchise fees from Xcel Energy. Anyone paying an electric bill has an additional tax. She asked where the franchise fees were going. Rick P. pointed out Staff cited 18,000 gallons as the average water use. He uses 5,000 gallons but he is charged at a minimum of 6,000 gallons. He asked what the extra money was used for. Ms. Holm stated residents are only charged for their water usage. Rick P. stated he has been charged a minimum for around ten years. Ms. Holm stated Staff would need to review his water bill. Jeff L. noted residents are charged a base fee on top of the cost for the usage, and it was noted in the presentation. He asked what the base fee is for. He is charged at a minimum 6,000 gallons. Mayor Graves requested Jeff L. follow up individually with Staff. Jeff L. explained he is talking about all residents because they are all being charged a minimum. Mayor Graves stated the presentation showed rates based on general usage. Jeff L. stated everyone is charged a base fee regardless of usage. Ms. Holm confirmed that is correct. Usage is an additional charge for every 1,000 gallons. They don’t calculate the base fee based on gallons. Dr. Edwards stated Staff would provide an answer directly to Jeff L. Councilmember Butler moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Kragness asked what would happen if the new rates don’t pass since they are already in the approved budget. Dr. Edwards explained Staff would need to redo the budget Page 24 of 155 12/9/24 -14- DRAFT accordingly. The rates would need to be calculated with the adjustments. The proposed increases are necessary to meet the costs of the utilities. Mayor Graves requested the audience remain quiet. Ms. Holm added the 2024 rate would remain in place. Staff would calculate the rate’s impact on cash flow and pending projects. Ultimately, Staff can bring rates back to the Council at any time for approval. Councilmember Kragness noted it would make more sense to set the rates prior to the budget. Ms. Holm agreed with Councilmember Kragness and the next round of budget discussions have the rate presentation earlier in the schedule. Councilmember Jerzak thanked Ms. Holm for her comments. The rates could impact the bonding rate, and he asked for clarification. Ms. Holm stated the 25 percent increase for water would be the lowest increase advised by Staff because of its impact on the bond rating. The 25 percent increase would get the City out of a negative cash amount in four years. The bond-rating folks do not appreciate negative cash amounts without an aggressive plan to address the deficit. The City has been advised to show an aggressive response to the deficit. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to adopt a Resolution for 2025 Water Utility Rates Councilmember Kragness pointed out she doesn’t like the rates, but something needs to be done to address the negative cash balance. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson noted her agreement with Councilmember Kragness and noted her begrudging support of the recommendation. Councilmember Jerzak voted against the same. Motion passed. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2024- 134, a Resolution for 2025 Sanitary Sewer Utility Rates. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson reiterated her begrudging support of the recommendation. Councilmember Jerzak voted against the same. Motion passed. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2024- 135, a Resolution for 2025 Storm Sewer Utility Rates. Councilmember Jerzak pointed out he supports the item because there are design plans for the Public Works Garage which is essential for Brooklyn Center. Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2024- 136, a Resolution for 2025 Street Light Rates. Page 25 of 155 12/9/24 -15- DRAFT Councilmember Jerzak explained he supports the item because many constituents have expressed concerns about streetlights throughout the City. Motion passed unanimously. Dr. Edwards noted there will be an additional increase to the recycling rates due to organics. The Council previously discussed the topic. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2024- 137, a Resolution for 2025 Recycling Rates. Councilmember Jerzak noted his appreciation of Staff’s transparency regarding the billing issue that requires such an increase. Motion passed unanimously. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 9a. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2024-012, SUBMITTED BY KKMBA BROOKLYN CENTER LLC, FOR A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR GOVERNMENTAL OFFICES (2501 COUNTY ROAD 10) - PUBLIC HEARING Dr. Edwards introduced the item and noted Planning Commission could not meet quorum to discuss the application or host the public hearing. He invited Planner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh to continue the Staff presentation. Ms. McIntosh explained KKMBA Brooklyn Center LLC is requesting an amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD) that would allow for “governmental offices” as a permitted use within the Shingle Creek Crossing shopping center and at 2501 County Road 10. This request is associated with a proposal for the Social Security Administration to enter into a 15-year lease to operate a field office in an approximately 12,500-square-foot tenant space on the property. The shell tenant space was constructed in 2019, yet despite numerous proposals over the years, no viable user has been identified. As proposed, the existing 9,000-square-foot Social Security Administration office, which is located less than one mile away at 3280 Northway Drive in Brooklyn Center, would be vacated. Ms. McIntosh pointed out that the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD stems from what was originally the Brookdale Mall. In 1999, City Council adopted Resolution No. 99-37, which approved a PUD/re-zoning of the Brookdale Mall properties from the C2 District to PUD/C2. In May 2011, what is known as the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD was approved to re-develop the Brookdale Mall. The Shingle Creek Crossing PUD has been amended numerous times to account for future Page 26 of 155 12/9/24 -16- DRAFT alterations/demolition of the remaining mall, re-platting/revisions to certain building pad sites, and changes to the approved uses within the Shingle Creek Crossing shopping center. Ms. McIntosh stated in June 2024, City Staff were informed that the approximately 12,500-square- foot shell space attached to HOM Furniture had been leased for use as a new Social Security Administration field office. City Staff informed Applicant/Property Owner KKMBA Brooklyn Center LLC that the proposed use of “governmental offices” was not a permitted use at that location per the approved PUD development plans and that as a TIF agreement had been executed, this could be considered a default under the agreement if not remedied. Ms. McIntosh noted that HOM Furniture received City approvals in 2017 to renovate the former Kohl’s building, construct an approximately 24,000-square-foot addition, and receive approvals for future improvements on Building Site X. Ms. McIntosh stated on October 15, 2024, applicant KKMBA Brooklyn Center LLC submitted a Planning Commission application for a major amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD that would allow for “governmental offices” as a permitted use within the Shingle Creek Crossing shopping center and at the property. Ms. McIntosh pointed out on October 31, 2024, a Public Hearing Notice published in the Sun Post. Unfortunately, on November 14, 2024, the Planning Commission failed to meet a quorum, so no hearing was held. On November 28, 2024, per Applicant's request, and in line with Section 35- 7203, a public hearing notice was re-published for the December 9, 2024, City Council meeting. Also on December 2, 2024, a 60-day letter of extension was issued to the applicant. Ms. McIntosh noted the existing Social Security Administration (SSA) office is located less than a mile away at 3280 Northway Drive, but desires to enter into a 15-year lease to operate an expanded field office at the property. Per the applicant, the SSA did not renew their lease term at their existing location as they require an expansion to meet the SSA’s new standards, with plans to vacate in early 2026 or sooner. Ms. McIntosh stated the approximately 12,500-square-foot shell space was completed in 2019, but despite numerous proposals over the years, no viable user has been identified. Shingle Creek Crossing shopping center is zoned PUD/C2, and while “governmental offices” is permitted as one of the limited C1 District uses allowed in the C2 District, the 2017 approval for the addition was for “multi-tenant retail” and not “governmental office” use. As the request is for the introduction of a new use not included within the PUD approval, the applicant is required to request approval of a “major amendment” to the PUD. Ms. McIntosh explained that was due to the fact that when HOM Furniture received approvals under City Council Resolution Nos. 2017-25 and 2017-174, the aforementioned approvals included tax increment considerations by the City’s Economic Development Authority (EDA) to address costs associated with certain stormwater improvements and the City’s EDA entered into a Tax Increment Finance (TIF) agreement with HOM Furniture to renovate the former Kohl’s Page 27 of 155 12/9/24 -17- DRAFT building, construct an approximately 24,000-square foot addition, of which included the 12,500- square foot addition intended for multi-tenant retail, and future improvements for Pad Site X. Ms. McIntosh showed an image of the site plan from a previous application from HOM. The buyer’s initial plan was to correct the existing blight of the Kohl’s building. The first level was intended to be market-rate retail space for rent. Additional development was planned to be market- driven and to develop the non-HOM balance of the site with aggressive marketing and adding complementary uses to the site. The goal was to fully develop the site to its densest and most complementary use. Ms. McIntosh showed images of the concept from HOM’s initial application. She then showed a proposed layout for the SSA use. Ms. McIntosh noted the applicant provided a narrative, interior layout, and architectural buildout set as part of their application submittal, which identifies a public entrance/vestibule, 36-seat waiting area, public restrooms, guard desk, VIP kiosk, writing counters, and partitioned counters for customers. There is also an employee entrance/vestibule, employee restrooms, cubicle and office space, a conference and break room, and a storage room to serve 28 staff. The hours of operations would be Monday through Friday 7 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. for employees and 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. for the public. Ms. McIntosh pointed out that the same SSA uses would be provided at the new location. Social security card services are not currently provided at the existing Brooklyn Center office but would be provided as part of an expanded location. Other existing metro locations include Minneapolis, Bloomington, and St. Paul. Ms. McIntosh stated per the applicant, “The SSA field office provides critical public services such as retirement, disability, and healthcare benefit management for Brooklyn Center and the surrounding areas. The high visitor volume underscores the community’s reliance on these services. The establishment of a government office in this location will enhance the availability of public services for the residents of Brooklyn Center and the surrounding areas. Government offices provide essential services such as public safety, administrative functions, and public outreach.” Ms. McIntosh added a report pulled for September 2024 indicated that 65 percent of visitors, which equates to 1,950 people, for the existing Brooklyn Center SSA office were residents within 4.5 miles of Brooklyn Center. Of those, 27 percent appear to be Brooklyn Center area residents per zip codes. The median age of a visitor to the SSA office is 33 years old. Ms. McIntosh noted the applicant states in their narrative that the SSA office has a positive economic impact on local businesses with approximately 50,000 visits per year, and that the SSA office supports local businesses by driving foot traffic to establishments with the majority of impact within a one-mile radius. However, visitor behavior data provided to the City notes that just six percent of visitors frequent nearby shopping centers, five percent visit grocery stores in the area, 12 percent of visitors continue on to local shops and services, and 13 percent proceed to local dining establishments within a three-mile radius. Page 28 of 155 12/9/24 -18- DRAFT Ms. McIntosh stated the applicant indicates in their narrative that the proposed use, “aligns with the City of Brooklyn Center’s Comprehensive Plan, while encouraging the adaptive reuse of properties to meet changing community needs and supporting the provision of essential community services boosting the local economy of Brooklyn Center. Government offices is a permitted use in the C2 district which overlays the Subject Property.” Ms. McIntosh pointed out the entirety of Shingle Creek Crossing is located within the City’s Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) future land use designation, and notes that the City has experienced significant change in the past decade regarding its changing demographics and land. With the closure of the Brookdale Mall, the retail landscape has shifted and changed. Although market conditions continue to pose challenges in forwarding Phase 1 of the Opportunity Site, which is located across from the property, City staff are optimistic about the recent adoption of the Master Plan. Despite closures within Shingle Creek Crossing, the shopping center has had renewed interest from users more aligned with the demographics and needs in Brooklyn Center, rather than the national chains the shopping center was originally envisioned for. Ms. McIntosh explained in reviewing the documentation provided by the applicant, City Staff has concerns regarding the overall complementariness of “governmental offices” at this location as shopping centers, in general, are typically designed to support uses like retail, dining, and other customer-facing services that drive foot traffic and economic activity. While “governmental offices” provide some level of face-to-face contact, these uses do not typically attract the same level of shoppers or contribute as robustly to a shopping center’s experience or vitality. Operation during daytime hours, less urgent traffic patterns, and generally more passive use that is not reliant on customers and purchases. Ms. McIntosh noted PUD and TIF Agreements aside, the subject property and Shingle Creek Crossing are positioned in the core of Brooklyn Center, where valuable real estate should be optimized for maximum potential use. It is assumed that the applicant and HOM Furniture would desire a user that would be complementary to their business and perhaps court customers to frequent their showroom and purchase their products. Ms. McIntosh stated Section 35-8304 (PUD Criteria) notes that, in addition to the criteria outlined in Section 35-7703 for conditional use permits, which does not apply for this PUD, the City Council shall base its decision upon the following additional criteria: compatibility of the development plan with the standards, purposes, and intent of this section, consistency of the development plan with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the impact of the development plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located, and the adequacy of internal site organization, uses, densities, circulations, parking facilities, public facilities, recreational uses, open spaces, and buffering and landscaping. Ms. McIntosh reiterated that the public hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on October 31, 2024; however, due to a failure in meeting quorum at the November 14, 2024, Planning Commission meeting, the public hearing notice was re-published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on November 28, 2024, for the December 9, 2024, City Council meeting. Page 29 of 155 12/9/24 -19- DRAFT Ms. McIntosh added notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners and physical addresses. The two major owners in proximity to the subject property include Gatlin Development Company and the City’s Economic Development Authority. Frank Gatlin corresponded with City staff regarding the proposed use and noted that, while he understood the struggle of the applicant to fill the approximately 12,500 SF space, as he himself has experienced in building out Shingle Creek Crossing, he did not think, “this particular tenant will be of any help to Shingle Creek as far as bringing in retail customers.” Mr. Gatlin noted that it would fill a dark space and the location is far enough from his retail that it would likely not have a negative impact, but it would also not have a positive impact with except one of having less empty space. Mr. Gatlin did not explicitly have any objection to the use other than having a desire to find better users to complement the center and create more traffic. Ms. McIntosh noted from the planning perspective, which included a review of the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Master Plans and documents, Planning Commission Application Nos. 2017- 001 and 2017-007, the City’s zoning provisions, and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, City planning Staff finds that the requested amendment to allow “governmental offices” within the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD, and as a replacement of the approved multi-tenant retail use at 2501 County Road 10 is inconsistent with the vision and objectives of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD and shopping center, is not the highest and best use for the Subject Property given daytime/weekday hours, and less urgent traffic patterns, which conflict with the dynamic nature of shopping center and tenants. Overall, the components have potential impacts on future development and economic growth for remaining sites, and given operations. Plus, the data provided by the applicant from Placer AI suggests use would not significantly increase foot traffic or customer visits, which are essential for the success of the shopping center. Ms. McIntosh pointed out the Staff recommendation for the Council is a motion to deny the requested major amendment to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development to allow "governmental offices" as a permitted use at the Subject Property located at 2501 County Road 10 and as contemplated under Planning Commission Application No. 2024-012. City planning Staff maintains the position that, based on the findings presented within the provided Staff report, the requested major amendment to the Planned Unit Development should be denied; however, if City Council elects to recommend approval of the request to allow for “governmental offices” within Shingle Creek Crossing shopping center, the motion language should be to approve the requested amendment to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development to allow for “governmental offices,” and with revised findings. Ms. McItnsoh stated the EDA and KKMBA Brooklyn Center LLC entered into a TIF Development Agreement, dated December 11, 2017, in conjunction with the developer’s proposed construction of the minimum improvements and stormwater improvements, but the developer has not completed the conditions for the disbursement of the TIF assistance under the TIF Agreement. Ms. McIntosh explained that the Developer is proposing the use of the property that is inconsistent with the retail use contemplated in the TIF Agreement and PUD, the developer noted a willingness to terminate the TIF Agreement if the PUD Amendment for “government use” is approved. If City Page 30 of 155 12/9/24 -20- DRAFT Council supports approving the major PUD amendment, which would allow “governmental offices” within the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD and on the subject property, City Staff further advises Council to approve the Planning Commission application contingent on termination of the related TIF Agreement. Ms. McIntosh offered to answer questions for the Council and noted the developer is present. Councilmember Jerzak pointed out the Planning Commission provides valuable perspective on such applications. He doesn’t tend to disagree with Staff’s recommendations. The existing blight and no use of the site is not the highest and best use. HOM has made a significant effort to market the space. The SSA is unlikely to prohibit future tenants. In fact, governmental offices typically have security which could encourage prospective tenants. Also, the traffic won’t compete with other businesses. Plus, Mr. Gatlin has no communicated objections to the proposed use. Councilmember Jerzak stated the other SSA offices are difficult to access, particularly for those with mobility issues or the elderly. The new location is light and accessible. The essential service trumps a desire for the highest and best uses. Overall, he supports the proposed use. Councilmember Kragness noted the proposed tenant isn’t compatible with the development plan, and the SSA wouldn’t bring in retail customers. Because the sites have been vacant for so long, they are being pressured to change the vision of the area. The City should prioritize recruiting businesses and find better fits. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to open the public hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Kevin S. disagreed with objections to the proposed use and stated the local community should have easy access to such essential services. The building is better than the existing one and is more accessible for those with accessibility considerations. There are plenty of spots to add retail in Shingle Creek Crossing among other places. Jeff L. stated the SSA is going to leave their current building, and they may move to another city. Regardless of the best use for the site, the SSA office should remain in Brooklyn Center. Mayor Graves reminded speakers to address comments to the presiding officer. Nahid K. noted her support of the government office at the proposed site. There are government offices in retail spaces all over the Twin Cities. Additional marketing efforts for the retail area would be beneficial. Brooklyn Center businesses have been advertising Maple Grove establishments when they should support local businesses instead. Laurie M. pointed out there used to be a Hennepin County office building surrounded by retail uses and a movie theater in the City. Zero percent of retail is still zero. Getting people to visit the Page 31 of 155 12/9/24 -21- DRAFT area is better than the existing use. The visitor data presented by Ms. McIntosh was encouraging rather than discouraging. Laurie M. added the existing SSA office is in need of a change. There hasn’t been a new tenant there is years. The NorthWest Tourism Board needs to do more work as well. Julie B. expressed her support of the proposed use. She frequents SSA offices, and another location to obtain a SSA card would be widely impactful. It may take an entire day at the South Minneapolis cases to merely obtain a card. John Pierce, a representative of the developer, explained five different brokers have worked on the site since its purchase in 2017. Before purchasing the site, the developer presented a number of ideas to Staff. Staff requested the developer to focus on building the HOM site. At that time, the site across the street had similar plans to be developed which didn’t come to fruition. Along with market conditions, it has been difficult to find a use for the retail space. Mr. Pierce explained Placer AI uses phone user traffic and shows that 3,700 people visit local food establishments after leaving an SSA office, 3,400 visit local shops, 1,700 visit shopping centers, and 1400 visit grocery stores. Mr. Pierce noted he has a number of comments on the topic, but the public comments support the developer’s proposal and the need for the proposed use. Mr. Pierce added the excerpts of the email from Mr. Gatlin didn’t include his plan to amend the PUD to allow for more uses. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to close the public hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to approve the requested major amendment to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development to allow "governmental offices" as a permitted use at the Subject Property located at 2501 County Road 10 and as contemplated under Planning Commission Application No. 2024-012 contingent on termination of the related TIF Agreement. Councilmember Kragness pointed out she believes there is a better use for the space, though she supports the services offered by the SSA. Councilmember Kragness voted against the same. Motion passed. 10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS It was the consensus of the Council to rearrange the order of the Council Consideration Items. Council Consideration Item 10a. Brooklyn Center Community Safety and Violence Prevention Page 32 of 155 12/9/24 -22- DRAFT became Council Consideration Item 10c. Brooklyn Center Community Safety and Violence Prevention. Council Consideration Item 10b. Resolution Adopting a City Council Code of Conduct and Ethics became Council Consideration Item 10a. Resolution Adopting a City Council Code of Conduct and Ethics. Additionally, Council Consideration Item 10c. 2025 Brooklyn Center Legislative Priorities became Council Consideration Item 10b. 2025 Brooklyn Center Legislative Priorities. 10a. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A CITY COUNCIL CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS Mayor Graves explained this item was pulled from the Consent Agenda because Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson wasn’t present for the previous discussion. Some Councilmembers have expressed interest in waiting for the 2025 Council to vote on the item. However, the present Council has been working on the item for a number of months. Councilmember Jerzak noted one reason he asked to pull the item was to allow Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson to provide input. There was also a correction missing from the document as previously requested by the Council. Councilmember Jerzak pointed out a new Councilmember has some grave concerns about the document and also believes it will be weaponized. The City has gone years without such a policy, and the new Councilmember will have to abide by it for four years. Therefore, the new Councilmember should have input. Councilmember Jerzak stated he doesn’t see a way he will support the policy. It will be used for political gamesmanship and weaponization. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson explained she thoroughly read the minutes of the previous conversation on the topic. She noted there is no definition for what constitutes a censure. She had requested clarification, but she has not received a response. The only issue she has with the document is the unclear accountability measures. Mayor Graves stated the first step is a verbal warning, then a written warning, and then the Council would have to agree to censure a Councilmember. There has also been a discussion on the accountability process for Commissions. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she would write, legal clarification of what offenses would warrant a censure. City Attorney Siobhan Tolar stated a violation of the policy could result in an accountability measure. The document includes relationships between Councilmembers and various entities such as the public, Staff, and other Councilmembers. The first step is a verbal warning, the second is a written warning, and the third would be a vote to censure. Ms. Tolar explained Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson previously asked for a definition of a censure. A censure is a public admonition by the Council that declares an individual has violated the Code of Conduct. Page 33 of 155 12/9/24 -23- DRAFT Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she agrees with much of the document, but she does agree with points made by Councilmember Jerzak. This is not an item that should be handled at the final meeting of the year. Ms. Tolar added the proposed resolution includes a provision for potential future amendments. The Council has the opportunity to revise the resolution as needed. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson pointed out that the Charter also addresses conduct and ethics. Mayor Graves stated the Charter doesn’t include any accountability measures. Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to table the Resolution Adopting a City Council Code of Conduct of Ethics. Councilmembers Butler and Kragness and Mayor Graves voted against the same. Motion failed Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2024- 128, a Resolution Adopting a City Council Code of Conduct of Ethics. Councilmembers Lawrence-Anderson and Jerzak voted against the same. Motion passed. SUSPENSION OF ADJOURNMENT RULES Mayor Graves moved and Lawrence-Anderson seconded to suspend the rules and allow the meeting to continue past 10:00 p.m. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked if there is a certain time limit for the meeting. Mayor Graves stated the meeting would conclude once the agenda was complete or 11:00 p.m., whichever was sooner. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she would only be willing to participate until 10:30 p.m. Councilmember Jerzak voted against the same. Motion passed. 10b. 2025 BROOKLYN CENTER LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES Councilmember Jerzak explained he requested this item be discussed because the Council hasn’t had a chance to review it. There are a few issues with the priorities as proposed. On page 11, the transportation priorities need to include the updated demands the City has provided to the Department of Transportation (MnDOT). Councilmember Jerzak noted on page 3, the City shouldn’t be involved in private business leases and negotiations. Councilmember Jerzak pointed out his first priority is the Public Garage, then the TIF, and the last one being third. Page 34 of 155 12/9/24 -24- DRAFT Councilmember Jerzak stated on page 6, he doesn’t want carve-outs for housing. A hodgepodge of ordinances throughout various cities make it difficult for landlords to conduct business. Councilmember Jerzak added on page ten, the Police Chief needs to weigh in on some of the priorities that would impact his Department, referring to legislation regarding 21st Century Policing. Mayor Graves noted she is comfortable with the legislative priorities. It is the same document that was presented to their representatives. There are a few priorities for big ticket items the Council previously agreed upon. Dr. Edwards stated all priorities are chosen by the Council and are intended to reflect the values of the Council. It is the purview of the Council to choose each of the legislative priorities. As for the top items, the three priorities highlighted have been emphasized by Council again and again. The three items will receive the most time and attention from Staff and the City’s representatives. Dr. Edwards pointed out 21st Century Policing has been integral to the Brooklyn Center Police Department for more than a decade, and the Police Chief has participated in the concept in the past. Councilmember Jerzak stated that is all he needed to know on the policing item. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to approve the 2025 Brooklyn Center Legislative Priorities. Motion passed unanimously. Dr. Edwards asked if Council wants to hear from the Chief of the Police Department. Mayor Graves stated the item has been approved, so Councilmember Jerzak can speak directly with the Police Chief if needed. Councilmember Jerzak stated he wanted to ensure the Chief was on board with the legislative item, and Dr. Edwards’ confirmation was all he needed. 10c. BROOKLYN CENTER COMMUNITY SAFETY AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION COMMISSION City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and reviewed the history of the discussion. The topic was delayed until the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Act could be further discussed by the Council. Since then, the Act has been discussed by the Council on several occasions. Staff has incorporated feedback from the discussions into the proposed resolution. Director of Community Prevention, Health and Safety LaToya Turk explained the Act calls for the establishment for a Community Safety and Violence Committee. The Commission is designed as an advisory to fulfill said mandate. Page 35 of 155 12/9/24 -25- DRAFT Ms. Turk noted the proposed committee ensures all members will be Brooklyn Center residents in alignment with the Act’s focus on lived experiences, members with direct interactions with criminal justice systems, or related services will be prioritized. The proposal specifies that City Staff will serve as non-voting liaisons to the Commission, ensuring their role is supportive rather than directive. Ms. Turk stated the purpose of the Commission includes reviewing current public safety policies and practices, such as responses and the effectiveness of models. This directly corresponds to the Act’s directive to review protest responses and recommend improvements. Ms. Turk noted while the Commission does not specifically function as a civilian oversight committee, its role in developing recommendations on public safety policy and advising on structural reforms supports the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Act’s intent to enhance civilian input and provide recommendations on critical issues, including labor agreements and policy amendments. Ms. Turk pointed out the Commission’s objectives encompass improving community health, addressing systemic inquiries, and advancing holistic violence prevention strategies, as envisioned in the initial Act. Its work supports the Act’s call for programs and policies aimed at improving community health in Brooklyn Center. Ms. Turk explained by promoting transparency, ongoing community forums, and reviewing public safety metrics, the proposed Commission creates a structured avenue to address community concerns, including responses to protests and other public safety incidents. The Commission’s ability to provide policy recommendations also allows for the review of City ordinances, fines, and fees, ensuring alignment with the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Act’s directive to examine provisions that impact community equity. Ms. Turk added by adopting an evidence-based approach and aligning with national best practices, the Community Safety and Violence Prevention Commission supports the Act’s overarching goal of creating a safer, more just community by using proven and forward-thinking public safety strategies. Ms. Turk stated the Commission would be composed of a chairperson, six voting members, and four non-voting members. All voting members must be residents with direct experience with public safety, judicial, or public health systems. All non-voting advisors must also have direct experience with public safety, judicial, or public health systems. Ms. Turk noted the City Manager would assign one Staff member to serve as liaison to perform administrative duties on behalf of the Commission. In addition, Staff from all public safety departments will attend meetings. The Office of Community Prevention, Health, and Safety would serve as the liaison for the Commission. Page 36 of 155 12/9/24 -26- DRAFT Ms. Turk pointed out the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Act initially called for a committee, but Staff is proposing a commission instead. She then reviewed the layout and headers within the resolution. Ms. Turk stated the duties and responsibilities of the Commission would include developing, advising, recommending, and upon adoption by the City Council, monitoring the execution of a comprehensive plan and recommending amendments to the plan as warranted relevant to community safety and violence prevention matters in the City, including the Act. Ms. Turk noted an additional responsibility would be advising and assisting the City in the adoption of policies and procedures by the City Council responsive to changing diverse community needs and concerns in matters of community safety and violence prevention, creating an annual report for the City Council regarding accomplishments toward fulfillment of such comprehensive plan and recommend amendments to the plan as warranted, advising and assisting the City in reviewing and discussing community safety and violence prevention policies for the City, and making recommendations to the City Council concerning community safety and violence prevention in the City. Ms. Turk continued to explain duties would be working with City Staff and other Commissions on matters regarding community safety and violence prevention in the City, reviewing current community safety and violence prevention initiatives, practices, and policies, working with neighborhood committees to understand the community safety and violence prevention needs of each area in the City, identifying high-priority areas for community safety and violence prevention in the community and analyzing methods of fulfilling these needs and interests and presenting alternative recommendations for actions to the City Council. Ms. Turk added responsibilities would include providing opportunities for the citizens of Brooklyn Center to voice their concerns and opinions regarding community safety and violence prevention matters, recommending new and innovative concepts in community safety and violence prevention for the City, advising, reviewing, and making recommendations for the City’s response to protests, reviewing the current collective bargaining agreement between the City make recommendations prior to final approval to the City Manager, and making any other recommendations to the City Council related to the initiation of programs or policies to improve community health in Brooklyn Center. Ms. Turk reiterated the Commission would be composed of a chairperson, six voting members, and four non-voting members. All voting members must be residents with direct experience with public safety, judicial, or public health systems. All non-voting advisors must also have direct experience with public safety, judicial, or public health systems. Ms. Turk added as for the method of selection, it is proposed the Office of Community Prevention, Health and Safety would provide the Mayor with a list of Commission candidates to serve on the Commission after review with the Brooklyn Center Police Department, Brooklyn Center Fire Department, and Brooklyn Center Parks and Recreation Department. The Mayor would then recommend candidates to the City Council for appointment. The City Council shall appoint Page 37 of 155 12/9/24 -27- DRAFT members to the Commission by resolution. The initial appointment would be staggered but would have term lengths, resignations, vacancies, chairpersons, vice chairs, compensation, bylaws, rules, and procedures would be the same as existing commissions. Ms. Turk pointed out the goal is to have the Commission launched by the second quarter of 2025. Ms. Turk stated the City Manager shall assign one member of Staff to serve as liaison to the Commission. The liaison assigned shall perform administrative duties on behalf of the commission. In addition to the Staff Liaison, City Staff from all public safety departments will attend commission meetings including the Office of Community Prevention Health and Safety, Brooklyn Center Police Department, Brooklyn Center Parks and Recreation Department and Brooklyn Center Fire Department with the Office of Community Prevention, Health and Safety serving as the liaison for the Commission. Also, there is a provision regarding neighborhood representation. Councilmember Butler stated the topic has been discussed to the point of exhaustion. It has been signed off on by all Department directors and legal Staff. The Project 252 Task Force didn’t receive full support, and it is mind-boggling that Council would be uninterested in input from community members with direct experience on a particular topic. Ultimately, the Police Chief remains the sole disciplinary body. Councilmember Kragness thanked Ms. Turk for the presentation and noted her support for the compromises and edits made by Staff. She noted she has a concern about the wording regarding the composition of the Commission. She suggested that portion be reworded to ensure all voting members are residents. Ms. Turk confirmed the edit would be made. Mayor Graves pointed out there is some benefit to include business owners or school employees who may not be residents. Councilmember Kragness agreed there should be non-resident community members included in the Commission, but voting should remain a privilege for residents, similar to other commissions. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Act doesn’t align with the presented composition. Mayor Graves agreed there isn’t perfect alignment precisely because the Council doesn’t agree with all components of the original Act. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson pointed out the initial Act is still an active document. Mayor Graves stated the original document can be edited to reflect the proposed composition. Councilmember Jerzak stated the presentation did address some of his concerns. However, the fact remains that the document wasn’t provided to the City Council or the public in advance of the meeting. He would like additional time to review the resolution prior to voting on approval. There are many well-intentioned Staff that don’t completely understand the implications of an ordinance. Councilmember Jerzak added the Commission may be a great opportunity, but it may be set up for failure if it believes its recommendations will automatically be approved. Page 38 of 155 12/9/24 -28- DRAFT Mayor Graves asked why he believes that for the proposed Commission and not the existing ones. Councilmember Jerzak explained his belief is based on personal experience. Mayor Graves asked if Councilmember Jerzak is referring to a past group that discussed public safety concerns but isn’t the Financial Commission, Housing Commission, Planning Commission, or the Parks and Recreation Commission. Councilmember Jerzak stated the Council has not had an opportunity to completely review the document. The proposal is monumental, and needs a thorough review. Also, the Daunte Wright and Kobe Dimock-Heisler Community Safety and Violence Prevention Act from which it derives has not been entirely reviewed by the Council. Councilmember Butler moved and Mayor Graves seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2024- 138, a Resolution for the Community Safety and Violence Prevention Commission. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson noted her preference to table the item. Motion passed (3-2, Councilmembers Jerzak and Butler). Mayor Graves pointed out she is open to continued conversation with other Councilmembers. 11. COUNCIL REPORT None. 12. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 10:31 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Page 39 of 155 12/19/24 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIAL SESSION DECEMBER 19, 2024 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council was called to order by Mayor April Graves at 5:02 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Mayor April Graves and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, Dan Jerzak, and Teneshia Kragness. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards, Equity and Human Resources Director Jim Langemo, Deputy City Clerk Shannon Pettit, and City Attorney Siobhan Tolar. 3. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS Dr. Edwards stated before we get started, he had an amendment to the agenda items 3c. should read Motion to Approve the Revised Contract for Dr. Edwards and 2b. should read Motion to Approve the Summary Performance Review for Dr. Edwards. 3a. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2025 LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES Dr. Edwards stated the 2025 Legislative Priorities were approved at the December 9, City Council Meeting but during the application process staff were notified that a resolution needed to be submitted. So tonight, we are simply asking for the council to approve the resolution. Mayor Graves made note that the language for the Highway 252 item has been changed and indicated the new language was much better. Mayor Butler moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded to approve the Summary Performance Review for Dr. Edwards. Motion passed unanimously. 3b. SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR DR. EDWARDS Mayor Graves stated the City Council met in closed session on November 25 and December 9, 2024, to conduct the performance evaluation of City Manager, Dr. Reggie Edwards. The council reviewed the City Manager’s self-evaluation form and other documents. Each council member then submitted their own impressions regarding the City Manager’s performance over the last year. Next, council members met to summarize their collective opinions. They identified certain areas for Dr. Edwards to focus on: enhancing economic growth, developing financial sustainability, Page 40 of 155 12/9/24 -2- DRAFT increasing safety for the community and our employees, improving engagement, and establishing effective communication. The summary was shared with Dr. Edwards on December 17, 2024. The City Council has also revised the City Manager’s job description and finalized the employment agreement with the City Manager. Mayor Butler moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded the motion to accept the summary of performance review for Dr. Edwards. Motion passed unanimously. 3c. REVISED CONTRACT FOR DR. EDWARDS Mayor Butler moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded the motion to accept the summary of performance review for Dr. Edwards. Motion passed 3-2 (Jerzak and Lawrence-Anderson). 4. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 5:10 Motion passed unanimously. Page 41 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Shannon Pettit, Deputy City Clerk THROUGH: Barb Suciu, City Clerk BY: Shannon Pettit, Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Approval of Licenses Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve the licenses as presented. Background: The following businesses/persons have applied for City licenses as noted. Each business/person has fulfilled the requirements of the City Ordinance governing respective licenses, submitted appropriate applications, and paid proper fees. Applicants for rental dwelling licenses are in compliance with Chapter 12 of the City Code of Ordinances unless comments are noted below the property address on the attached rental report. Mechanical Hamlin Installations 1552 97th Avenue, Hammond, WI 54015 Jackson Family Heating and Cooling LLC 5007 49th Ave N, Crystal 55429 Gasoline Service Station Christy's Auto Service 5300 Dupont Ave N Tobacco Royal Tobacco 5625 Xerxes Ave N Brook Center Plus 615 66th Ave N Budget Issues: - None Inclusive Community Engagement: - None Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: - None Strategic Priorities and Values: Page 42 of 155 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Rental Criteria 2. For Council Approval 1.13.25 FOR COUNCIL 12.2 to 12.31 Page 43 of 155 Page 2 of 2 b.Police Service Calls. Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12-911, and events categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, auto theft and arson. Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the victim and suspect are “Family or household members” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (b) and where there is a report of “Domestic Abuse” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (a). License Category Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Service & Part I Crimes (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category Impact 1-2 0-1 3-4 units 0-0.25 5 or more units 0-0.35 Decrease 1 Category 1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 3-4 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 Categories 1-2 Greater than 3 3-4 units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria License Category (Based on Property Code Only) Number of Units Property Code Violations per Inspected Unit Type I – 3 Year 1-2 units 0-2 3+ units 0-0.75 Type II – 2 Year 1-2 units Greater than 2 but not more than 5 3+ units Greater than 0.75 but not more than 1.5 Type III – 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 5 but not more than 9 3+ units Greater than 1.5 but not more than 3 Type IV – 6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 9 3+ units Greater than 3 Page 44 of 155 Location Address License Subtype Renewal/Initial Owner Property Code Violations License Type Police CFS* Final License Type** Previous License Type*** Consecutive Type IV's 3907 65th Ave N Multiple Family 3 Bldgs 53 Units Initial Granite Peaks Llc 228 = 4.3 per unit Type IV N/A Type IV N/A 0 3016 Quarles Rd Single Initial Khemchand Ramcharitar 7 Type III N/A Type III N/A N/A 5341 72nd Cir Single Initial Sledge Deffoe 12 Type IV N/A Type IV N/A N/A 5418 Penn Ave N Single Initial Sonny Vang 2 Type I N/A Type II N/A N/A 5924 June Ave N Single Initial William Nhia Her Vang 6 Type III N/A Type III N/A N/A 7001 Logan Ave N Single Initial UNICORN PROPERTIES LLC 3 Type II N/A Type II N/A N/A 7156 Unity Ave N Single Initial Ameen Haidari 2 Type I N/A Type II N/A N/A 4500 58th Ave N Multiple Family 46 Bldgs 276 Units Renewal Tln Lanel A Ltd Partnership 418 = 1.5 per unit Type II 0 Type II Type II N/A 4806 Twin Lake Ave N Multiple Family 1 Bldg 4 Units Renewal Pheng Lee Did not meet requirements 6 = 1.5 per unit Type II 0 Type III Type III N/A 5301 Dupont Ave N Multiple Family 1 Bldg 6 Units Renewal Wright Team Properties 28 = 4.6 per unit Type IV 0 Type IV Type IV 3 5500 Bryant Ave N Multiple Family 1 Bldg 4 Units Renewal N Mejia-morales & V Idrovo Did not meet requirements 2 = 0.5 per unit Type I 0 Type III Type III N/A 6305 Camden Ave N Multiple Family 6 Bldgs 217 Units Renewal Melrose Gates Apartments 352 = 1.6 per unit Type III 0 Type III Type II N/A 4220 Lakeside Ave N Two Family Renewal R G Arntson/k J Arntson Etal 5 Type II 0 Type II Type I N/A 4748 Twin Lake Ave Two Family Renewal Rco Holdings Llc Met Requirements 5 Type II 0 Type II Type IV N/A 5337 Queen Ave N Two Family Renewal Edith Perlin/gregory Perlin 18 Type IV 0 Type IV Type IV 8 5344 Russell Ave N Two Family Renewal Cloeshette King Torboh 0 Type I 0 Type I Type II N/A 4207 Lakeside Ave N, #138 Condo Renewal Patrick Hall Met Requirements 0 Type I 0 Type I Type III N/A 1331 67th La N Single Renewal Matthew Weinacht Met Requirements 0 Type I 0 Type I Type III N/A 1619 73rd Ave N Single Renewal SFR ACQUISITIONS 2 LLC 14 Type IV 0 Type IV Type IV 2 Rental Licenses for Council Approval 1.13.24 Page 45 of 155 3121 Lawrence Rd Single Renewal Empire Care Systems Did not meet requirements 2 Type I 0 Type IV Type IV 2 4600 69th Ave N Single Renewal Aisheh Wazwaz & Sami Ameri Did not meet requirements 0 Type I 0 Type IV Type IV 3 4734 Twin Lake Ave N Single Renewal R A Becht & E A Armstrong 2 Type I 0 Type I Type I N/A 5300 Penn Ave N Single Renewal Ashley E Sykora 0 Type I 0 Type I Type II N/A 6229 Brooklyn Dr Single Renewal Joy Vang 2 Type I 0 Type I Type II N/A 7024 Ewing Ave N Single Renewal MOUA STAR HOMES, LLC 0 Type I 0 Type I Type II N/A 7025 Grimes Ave N Single Renewal SFR ACQUISITIONS 3 LLC 15 Type IV 0 Type IV Type II 0 *CFS = Calls for service for renewal licenses only (Initial licenses are not applicable to CFS and will be listed as N/A) **License type being issued ***Initial licenses will not show a Type I = 3 year, Type II = 2 year, Type III = 1 year, Type IV = 6 months All properties are current on City utilities and property taxes Page 46 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Barb Suciu, City Clerk THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Barb Suciu, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Designating Official Newspaper for 2025 Requested Council Action: - motion to approve a resolution designating the official newspaper for 2025 Background: Section 12.01 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter requires the City Council to annually designate a legal newspaper of general circulation of the City as its official newspaper in which the City will publish ordinances, bids, public hearing notices, advertising for proposals, assessments, bonds, financial reports, and other matters as required by law. City staff solicited several companies for quotes and only received information from Adams Publishing Group. Once again, staff is requesting that the City Council consider designating Brooklyn Center Sun-Post to be the official newspaper for 2025. Brooklyn Center Sun-Post meets all necessary requirements of a qualified newspaper under MN Statutes 331A.02, Subd. 1. The rate structure is attached is the quote from East Central Minnesota. Budget Issues: This item is already considered in the 2025 budget. Inclusive Community Engagement: None Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: None Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2025 Annual_Newspaper_Designation 2. 20250109111906792 Page 47 of 155 Member ______ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION DESIGNATING OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER WHEREAS, Section 12.01 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter requires the City Council to annually at its first meeting of the year designate a legal newspaper of general circulation in the city as its official newspaper in which shall be published such ordinances and other matters as are required by law to be so published and such other matters as the council may deem it advisable and in the public interest to have published in this manner; and WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Sun-Post has previously been so designated; and WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Sun-Post meets all necessary requirements for designation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the Brooklyn Center Sun-Post is hereby designated as the official newspaper for the City of Brooklyn Center for the year 2025. January 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 48 of 155 Page 49 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Barb Suciu, City Clerk THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Barb Suciu, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Appointing Mayor Pro Tem and President Pro Tem for 2025 Requested Council Action: - motion to approve the appointment of Mayor Pro Tem and President Pro Tem for 2025 Background: Section 2.06 of the City Charter requires the Council to choose from its members a President Pro Tem who shall hold office at the pleasure of the council and shall serve as President in the Mayor's absence and as Mayor in case of the Mayor's disability or absence from the City. City Council Resolution No. 92-262, Establishing and Designating an Acting President Pro Tem of the City Council, states the most senior Council member shall preside in the absence of both the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem, and that in the event two or more members have equal seniority, then that member shall preside who received the most votes in their most recent election. • Kris Lawrence-Anderson (first elected November 6, 2012) • Teneshia Kragness (first elected November 8, 2022) • Dan Jerzak (first elected November 8, 2022) • Laurie Ann Moore (first elected November 5, 2024) Budget Issues: None Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2025-Mayor_Pro_Tem Page 50 of 155 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Member _____introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION APPOINTING PRESIDING OFFICERS – MAYOR PRO TEM AND ACTING MAYOR PRO TEM FOR 2025 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that for 2025 the Mayor Pro Tem be Councilmember Teneshia Kragness and the Acting Mayor Pro Tem be the most senior councilmember present in accordance with Resolution 92-262. January 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: none whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 51 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Barb Suciu, City Clerk THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Barb Suciu, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Declaring Commitment to the Brooklyn Center City Charter for 2025 Requested Council Action: - motion to approve a resolution declaring commitment to the Brooklyn Center City Charter Background: The City Manager is directed to place this resolution for re-adoption on the agenda for the first meeting of the City Council each January as information as and reminder of Council/Manager responsibilities. Budget Issues: - None Inclusive Community Engagement: - None Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: - None Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2025 Charter Commitment Page 52 of 155 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Member ______ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION DECLARING COMMITMENT TO THE BROOKLYN CENTER CITY CHARTER WHEREAS, Brooklyn Center voters in 1966 adopted a City Charter creating a Council/Manager form of government; and WHEREAS, said Charter provides that the City Council shall determine all matters of policy, and the City Manager shall be the head of the administrative branch of the City Government; and WHEREAS, the Charter provides that there be no separate administrative boards or commissions other than advisory boards or commissions; and WHEREAS, numerous advisory commissions have served the City since adoption of the Charter; and WHEREAS, the Charter provides that the City Manager shall control and direct all departments and divisions of the City and shall have the right to take part in Council discussion and shall recommend such measures as deemed necessary; and WHEREAS, the Charter prohibits Council members from dictating the appointment of any person to office or employment by the City Manager except as provided in Chapter 6 of this Charter; and WHEREAS, the Charter requires the Council to deal with and control the administrative service solely through the City Manager and prohibits any Council member from giving orders to any subordinate of the City Manager, either publicly or privately; and WHEREAS, the City Manager is charged by the Charter to see that the City Charter and the laws and resolutions of the City are enforced; and WHEREAS, the Council as a whole also has an obligation to ensure that its business is conducted pursuant to the City Charter and the norms of acceptable and courteous business behavior; and WHEREAS, Council members must depend upon the City Manager and staff to provide them with a great amount of background information, data, and expertise to aid in deliberating issues, developing policy, and administering the Council’s responsibilities; and Page 53 of 155 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the effectiveness of the services provided by the staff is in large part determined by a relationship of trust and mutual respect between the staff and the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council: 1. To rededicate itself to the spirit and letter of the City Charter and to commit itself to ensuring compliance by the City Council collectively and individually with that spirit and letter of the City Charter. 2. To rededicate itself to the checks and balances of the City Charter that keep City government accountable. 3. To pledge that in its dealings with citizens and City staff, that the City Council will treat such citizens and staff with respect and courtesy. The Council shall deal with staff in accordance with the City Charter through the City Manager. 4. To discharge its responsibilities as intended and established by federal, state, and local laws and the City Charter, and to do so in a fair and impartial manner for the good of the whole City and without regard for personal gain or interests. 5. To direct the City Manager to place this resolution for re-adoption on the agenda for the first meeting of the City Council each January hereafter, as information and reminder of Council/Manager responsibilities. January 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: none whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 54 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Barb Suciu, City Clerk THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Barb Suciu, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Recognizing the Contributions of Ethnic Populations and Heritage Celebrations for 2025 Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve a resolution recognizing the contributions of ethnic populations and heritage celebrations Background: Since 2003, as part of the City Council's goal of inclusiveness, one of the aspects was to recognize the various ethnic populations and their contributions as well as heritage celebrations. The proposed resolution implements that Council policy by an inclusive list of celebrations and contributions in one resolution. By adopting this resolution, the City acknowledges these many events that occur throughout the course of the year. This list is reviewed and amended annually. Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Annual_recognizing_the_contributions_of_ethic_populations Page 55 of 155 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF ETHNIC POPULATIONS AND HERITAGE CELEBRATIONS WHEREAS, the City Council has established a goal to promote the inclusion of all residents in Brooklyn Center’s community life by emphasizing opportunities to include all residents in the community’s activities and plans; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that its cultural composition has changed significantly over the past two decades, with its ethnic population over half of its total population; and WHEREAS, Brooklyn Center is strengthened by the rich cultural diversity of its people, and welcomes individuals of all races, religions, and cultural backgrounds; and WHEREAS, each individual brings a part of his or her own heritage and over time each heritage becomes part of our common heritage, leading us to become a more united people; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the vital contributions ethnic populations have made to the strength and diversity of our community and recognizes their rich legacy of ingenuity, perseverance, and achievement; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the following heritage celebrations and all other heritage celebrations reflected in Brooklyn Center’s population are recognized for the purpose of encouraging our citizens to learn more about the history of ethnic populations and how they have contributed to the culture and heritage of our community: February African-American History Month March National Women’s History Month March Irish-American Heritage Month March 25 Greek Independence Day April National Arab American Heritage Month April 14 Pan American Day May Asian and Pacific American Heritage Month May Jewish American Heritage Month May 17 (Syttende Mai) Norwegian Constitution Day May 21 World Day for Cultural Diversity June Caribbean-American Heritage Month June 6 Swedish National Day September 15-October 15 Hispanic Heritage Month October Italian American Heritage Month October 6 German-American Day November American Indigenous Heritage Month Page 56 of 155 RESOLUTION NO. January 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 57 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Angela Holm, Director of Finance THROUGH: BY: Barb Suciu, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Designating the Depositories for City Funds for 2025 Requested Council Action: Background: At the beginning of each fiscal year, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 118A.02 and City Council Policy 2.22.4.A, the City Council considers a resolution authorizing depositories for City funds. The resolution includes banks with a presence in Brooklyn Center as well as any banks with whom the City deals on a regular basis throughout the year. The attached resolution designates banks which may not currently hold City funds but which may during the fiscal year, become a depository for City funds. Other financial depositories, such as the 4M Funds, are included because we are members of those depositories. Not all investment dealers/brokers are part of the City’s current program but are authorized, after filing the appropriate Broker Certification Form, a requirement of Minnesota Statutes 118A, to transact business with the City of Brooklyn Center. If the City has no contact or activity with a dealer/broker during the previous fiscal year, that firm is removed not included in the succeeding year’s list. All banks, depositories, investment dealers and brokers, with the exception of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, are checked for certification by FDIC, SIPC or other certification as required by Minnesota Statutes 118A. All of this documentation is reviewed by the City’s auditors during the financial statement audit each year. Budget Issues: - None Inclusive Community Engagement: - None Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: - None Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Annual_Designating_Depositories_of_City_Funds_2024 Page 58 of 155 Page 59 of 155 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Member _____ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES OF CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, Section 7.01 of the City Charter provides the City Council with authority over City funds that includes the safekeeping and disbursement of public monies; and WHEREAS, Section 7.10 of the City Charter provides that City funds shall be disbursed by check bearing the actual or facsimile signature of the City Manager and City Treasurer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota as follows: 1. That US Bank, NA is hereby designated as a depository for funds of the City of Brooklyn Center for operational banking and investment purposes. 2. That the following named bankers and brokers are hereby designated as additional depositories to be used for investment purposes: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund) Minnesota Municipal Money Market Plus Fund (4M Plus Fund) Minnesota Municipal Money Market Time Series Pools (4M Time Series) Oppenheimer & Co., Inc Moreton Capital Markets, LLC The City Treasurer is hereby authorized to deposit funds in accounts guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Securities Insurance Protection Corporation (SIPC), successors of the FDIC or SIPC or other governmental institutions insuring the safety and liquidity of public monies. Funds deposited with designated depositories in excess of the insurance limits available through FDIC, SIPC or its successor institutions shall be covered by collateral in the form of government securities held in the City’s name or other collateral proposed by the institution and approved by the City of not less than 110% of the value of the uninsured deposits. 3. That the following named clearinghouses for credit card transactions are hereby designated for accepting payments: Wells Fargo Merchant Services Fidelity Payment Services Paya Payment Services PayTrac Payment Services Page 60 of 155 RESOLUTION NO.______________ GolfNOW Payment Services 4. Principal Custody Solutions is hereby designated as the safekeeping depository for investment instruments in the City’s investment portfolio and as clearinghouse for the City’s investment portfolio transactions. 5. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager, the City Treasurer, or the Deputy City Treasurer to act for the City in all of its business activities with these designated depositories. January 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: none whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 61 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Angela Holm, Director of Finance THROUGH: BY: Barb Suciu, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Opting Not to Waive Limited Tort Liability for 2025 Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve a resolution adopting the no waiver option for statutory tort liability insurance Background: Each year the City must choose whether to waive tort liability limit protections of Minnesota Statutes 466.04 as part of the insurance policy renewal application process. M.S. 466.04 states that the maximum liability for a city for any claim is $500,000 with an aggregate maximum of $1,500,000 per incident. In past years the City Council has chosen not to waive the liability limits and the regular premium for insurance has covered all claims. If the City were to waive the limits set by statute, it would be prudent to purchase additional insurance coverage to cover possible higher awards in liability claims. Premiums for such insurance would be approximately $6,700 per year. Budget Issues: The 2025 budget anticipates leaving the no waiver option in place for 2025 and has anticipated insurance premiums based on that no waiver option. Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2025 Non_waiver_of_liability_limits_resolutions Page 62 of 155 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION OPTING NOT TO WAIVE LIMITED TORT LIABILITY FOR 2025 WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has an option to waive its protection under the tort liability limitation contained in Minnesota Statutes 466.04; and WHEREAS, the statutory tort limit for 2025 is $500,000 per individual with an aggregate of $1,500,000 per incident; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has not opted to waive its rights to limited tort liability in past years and is required to make a declaration of its intention every year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the City does not waive the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04 for 2025. January 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 63 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Angela Holm, Director of Finance THROUGH: BY: Barb Suciu, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Granting Corporate Authority for Signing of Checks and Transactions of Financial Business Matters for 2025 Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve a resolution granting corporate authority for signing checks and transactions of financial business matters to the City Manager and Finance Director for the City of Brooklyn Center. Background: Many investment firms require the adoption of a resolution by the corporate board, in this case the City Council, authorizing specific officers to transact financial business involving treasury notes, certificates of deposit and other securities. The attached resolution fulfills that requirement by appointing the City Manager, and the Finance Director, who serves as the City Treasurer, as the officers authorized to transact such business. Budget Issues: - None Inclusive Community Engagement: - None Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: - None Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2025 Granting_Corporate_Authority Page 64 of 155 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION GRANTING CORPORATE AUTHORITY FOR SIGNING OF CHECKS AND TRANSACTIONS OF FINANCIAL BUSINESS MATTERS WHEREAS, the City Treasurer must be a signatory to any and all checks issued by the City in payment of obligations of the City; and WHEREAS, specific individuals must be designated by the City Council as authorized to sell, assign, and endorse for transfer various financial instruments in the regular conduct of City business. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Dr. Reggie Edwards, City Manager, and Angela Holm, Finance Director, are hereby authorized to sell, assign and endorse for transfer certificates representing treasury notes, bonds, or other securities now registered or hereafter registered in the name of this municipality. January 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 65 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Barb Suciu, City Clerk THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Barb Suciu, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Appointing Council Members to Commissions and Outside Organizations for 2025 Requested Council Action: Background: Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2025-Annual_Appointments_to_Commissions_and_outside_organizations. (1) Page 66 of 155 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Member ________introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION APPOINTING CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO SERVE AS LIAISONS TO CITY ADVISORY COMMISSIONS AND AS CITY REPRESENTATIVES/VOTING DELEGATES FOR OTHER ORGANIZATIONS FOR 2025 WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center City Council members are appointed to serve as liaisons to City Advisory Commissions and to serve as City Representatives/Voting delegates for other organizations annually; and WHEREAS, this resolution will ratify the appointments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the following appointments are hereby approved: Commission/Organization Council Member Cultural & Public Art Commission Mayor April Graves Financial Commission Councilmember Teneshia Kragness Housing Commission Councilmember Kris Lawrence-Anderson Park & Recreation Commission Councilmember Laurie Ann Moore Brooklyns Youth Council Councilmember Teneshia Kragness Crime Prevention Program Mayor April Graves/Councilmember Dan Jerzak League of Minnesota Cities Councilmember Kris Lawrence-Anderson Metro Cities Councilmember Laurie Ann Moore 252 Project Advisory Committee Councilmember Dan Jerzak January 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: none whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 67 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Barb Suciu, City Clerk THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Barb Suciu, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Appointing Brooklyn Center Representatives to the Executive Committee and/or Board of Directors of the Brooklyn Bridge Alliance for Youth, Hennepin Recycling Group, Local Government Information Systems (LOGIS), Northwest Tourism, North Metro Mayors Association, Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission, Pets Under Police Security (PUPS), and Twin Lake Joint Powers Organization Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve a resolution appointing Brooklyn Center Representatives to the Executive Committee and/or Boards Background: Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2025 Annual_Appointments_of_BC_Reps_to_JPOs Page 68 of 155 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Member _____ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION APPOINTING BROOKLYN CENTER REPRESENTATIVES TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND/OR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE BROOKLYN BRIDGE ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH, HENNEPIN RECYCLING GROUP, LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, MINNEAPOLIS NORTHWEST TOURISM NORTH METRO MAYORS ASSOCIATION, NORTHWEST SUBURBS CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, PETS UNDER POLICE SECURITY, AND TWIN LAKES JOINT POWERS ORGANIZATION WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center entered into a Joint Powers Agreement for the establishment of the Brooklyn Bridge Alliance for Youth on November 24, 2008, and Article III, Section 3.2, of the joint powers agreement states that each member appoints one member of its governing body as a voting Director, one Alternate Director, one Director from the City’s Police Department, and one Director from the City’s Parks and Recreation Department; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center entered into a Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the establishment of Hennepin Recycling Group on August 1, 1988, and Article IV, Section 2, of the joint powers agreement states that the governing body of a member appoints directors; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center entered into a Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the establishment of Local Government Information Systems (LOGIS), on May 1, 1972, and Article IV, Section 1, of the joint powers agreement states that the governing body of a member appoints directors; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center entered into a Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the establishment of the North Metro Convention and Tourism Bureau, now known as Minneapolis Northwest Convention & Visitors Bureau, on September 8, 1986, and Article IV, Section 2, of the bylaws states that each member City may appoint one Director and one Alternate Director to the Board of Directors. WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center entered into a Joint Powers Agreement for the establishment of the North Metro Mayors Association on June 26, 1989, and the joint powers agreement states that the governing body of a member appoints two directors, one of whom shall be the City Manager or other designee; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center entered into a Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the establishment of the Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission on September 24, 1979, and Article VI, Section 1, of the joint powers agreement states that the City Council of a member appoints Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center entered into a Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the establishment of Pets Under Police Security (PUPS) on September 10, 1990, and Article IV, Section 2, of the joint powers agreement states that the governing body of a member appoints directors; and Page 69 of 155 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center entered into a Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the establishment of the Twin Lakes Joint Powers Organization on January 14, 1991, and Article IV, Section 2, of the joint powers agreement states that the governing body of a member appoints directors; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the following appointments are hereby approved: Brooklyn Bridge Alliance for Youth, Member Mayor Graves Brooklyn Bridge Alliance for Youth, Alternate Member Brooklyn Bridge Alliance for Youth, Police Garett Flesland Brooklyn Bridge Alliance for Youth, Parks and Recreation Carissa Goebel Hennepin Recycling Group, Director Liz Heyman Hennepin Recycling Group, Alternate Director Reggie Edwards Local Government Information Systems (LOGIS), Director Reggie Edwards Local Government Information Systems (LOGIS), Alternate Director Kao Yang Minneapolis Northwest Tourism, Director Cordell Wiseman Minneapolis Northwest Tourism, Director Jesse Anderson Minneapolis Northwest Tourism, Alternate Director Ian Alexander North Metro Mayors Association, Director – City Manager Reggie Edwards North Metro Mayors Association, Director April Graves Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission, Council Dan Jerzak Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission, Resident Darryl Sannes Pets Under Police Security, Director Richard Gabler Pets Under Police Security, Alternate Director Garett Flesland Twin Lakes Joint Powers Organization, Director Tony Gruenig Twin Lakes Joint Powers Organization, Alternate Director Richard Gabler January 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: none whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 70 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Todd Berg, Fire Chief THROUGH: Reggie Edwards, City Manager BY: Barb Suciu, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Appointing Municipal Trustees to the Brooklyn Center Fire Relief Association Board of Trustees Requested Council Action: Approve a resolution appointing municipal trustees to the Brooklyn Center Fire Relief Association Board of Trustees Background: Article V of the Brooklyn Center Firefighters Relief Association Bylaws states that the Board of Directors shall consist of three (3) officials drawn from the Municipality. The three (3) Municipal Officials must be one (1) elected municipal official and one (1) elected or appointed municipal official who are designated as municipal representatives by the municipal governing board annually, and the chief of the municipal fire department. Elected Municipal Official, April Graves Elected or Appointed Municipal Official, Angie Holm Fire Chief, Todd Berg Budget Issues: None Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Annual_Appointments_to_BC_Firefighters_Relief_Association_2025 Page 71 of 155 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION APPOINTING MUNICIPAL TRUSTEES TO THE BROOKLYN CENTER FIREFIGHTERS RELIEF ASSOCIATION BOARD OF TRUSTEES WHEREAS, Article V of the Brooklyn Center Firefighters Relief Association Bylaws states that the Board of Directors shall consist of three (3) officials drawn from the Municipality; and WHEREAS, the three (3) Municipal Officials must be one (1) elected municipal official and one (1) elected or appointed municipal official who is designated as municipal representatives by the municipal governing board annually, and the chief of the municipal fire department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the following appointments are hereby approved for 2025: Elected Municipal Official April Graves Elected or Appointed Municipal Official Angie Holm Fire Chief Todd Berg January 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 72 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Barb Suciu, City Clerk THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Barb Suciu, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Approving the 2025 Fee Schedule Requested Council Action: -motion to approve the 2025 Fee Schedule Background: This is the annual approval the fee schedule. Any amendments that haven't been approved by resolution are distinguished in red. Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: - None Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: - None Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2025-Fee_Schedule 2. 2025 FEE SCHEDULE WORKING DOC Page 73 of 155 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2025 FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has a comprehensive fee schedule that is used by staff during the year; and WHEREAS, this fee schedule has been amended for the 2025 calendar year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the 2025 Fee Schedule be adopted. January 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 74 of 155 2025 FEE SCHEDULE Approved 1.13.25 Page 75 of 155 Introduction In March 1987, the Brooklyn Center City Council approved an amendment to the City Ordinances that removed the fees for licenses and permits from the City Ordinances and established fees by Council resolution. The resolutions establishing fees for licenses and permits were collated into the following fee schedule, and it is updated whenever fees are amended, or new fees are established. It provides a means by which fees for permits, licenses, and miscellaneous services are incorporated into one document to aid employees who need to collect fees or provide public information regarding fees. Fees for licenses and permits are set forth by Council resolution. Fees for copies, research projects, maps, and ordinances are generally set by the City Manager. Fees relating to the Community Center and Centerbrook Golf Course can be obtained directly from the Recreation Department and are not included in this fee schedule. Fees relating to the Heritage Center of Brooklyn Center can be obtained directly from the Heritage Center and are not included in this fee schedule. Page 76 of 155 Table of Contents City Clerk’s Office Licenses Licenses Amusement Device ........................................................................................................................1 Animals..........................................................................................................................................1 Bowling Alley .................................................................................................................................1 Christmas Tree...............................................................................................................................1 Entertainment................................................................................................................................1 Filling Station.................................................................................................................................1 Filming & Photography..................................................................................................................1 Fireworks .......................................................................................................................................1 Garbage/Rubbish Collection...........................................................................................................1 Hospitality......................................................................................................................................1 Liquor – Consumption and Display.................................................................................................1 Liquor – Off-Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor....................................................................................................1 Liquor – Off-Sale Brew Pub.............................................................................................................1 Liquor – Off-Sale Microdistillery.....................................................................................................1 Liquor – Off-Sale Small Brewer License...........................................................................................2 Liquor – On-Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor....................................................................................................2 Liquor – On-Sale Brew Pub.............................................................................................................2 Liquor – On-Sale Brewer Taproom..................................................................................................2 Liquor – On-Sale Club.....................................................................................................................2 Liquor – On-Sale Intoxicating .........................................................................................................2 Liquor – On-Sale Microdistillery Cocktail Room..............................................................................2 Liquor – On-Sale Sunday Sales........................................................................................................2 Liquor – On-Sale Temporary...........................................................................................................2 Liquor – On-Sale Wine....................................................................................................................2 Massage Establishment.................................................................................................................2 Motor Vehicle Dealer.....................................................................................................................2 Pawnbroker ...................................................................................................................................2 Rap Parlor, Conversation Parlors, Adult Encounter Groups, Adult Sensitivity Groups, Escort Service, Model Services, Dancing Services, or Hostess Services.............................................................................................3 Saunas or Sauna Baths...................................................................................................................3 Secondhand Goods Dealer.............................................................................................................3 Sign Hanger ...................................................................................................................................3 Special Events ................................................................................................................................3 Taxicab...........................................................................................................................................3 Tobacco Related Products..............................................................................................................3 Page 77 of 155 Table of Contents Community Development Permits/Licenses Permits/Licenses Building and Fire Protection...........................................................................................................4 Cesspool Cleaning..........................................................................................................................5 Courtesy Bench ..............................................................................................................................5 Demolition.....................................................................................................................................5 Electrical Residential......................................................................................................................5 Electrical Commercial.....................................................................................................................6 Flood Plain Use...............................................................................................................................7 House moving................................................................................................................................7 Land Disturbing Activities...............................................................................................................7 Mechanical Systems License...........................................................................................................7 Mechanical Systems.......................................................................................................................7 Planning Commission Fees.............................................................................................................7 Plumbing........................................................................................................................................8 Rental ............................................................................................................................................8 Right-of-Way..................................................................................................................................8 Sign................................................................................................................................................8 Community Center Daily Admission.............................................................................................................................9 Punch Cards...................................................................................................................................9 Memberships ................................................................................................................................9 Miscellaneous Abatement Application ...............................................................................................................10 Abatement ..................................................................................................................................10 Accident Reports (Police) ............................................................................................................10 Administrative Penalty System Fees............................................................................................10 Appeal Filing Fee – Chapter 12 and Chapter 19 ..........................................................................10 Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Administrative Review...............................................................10 Beekeeping Registration..............................................................................................................10 Copy Charges...............................................................................................................................11 Dogs.............................................................................................................................................11 Fingerprinting (Police...................................................................................................................12 Franchise (Natural Gas) ...............................................................................................................12 Franchise (Electric) ......................................................................................................................12 Hearing Request Deposit.............................................................................................................12 Inspections...................................................................................................................................12 Page 78 of 155 Intoxilyzers Logs (Police) ..............................................................................................................12 Lot Combination...........................................................................................................................12 Maps............................................................................................................................................12 NSF Check ....................................................................................................................................12 Opportunity Site Stormwater Fee ................................................................................................13 Police Reports ..............................................................................................................................13 Public Subsidy Application Fee ....................................................................................................13 PUD Amendment (Minor) ...........................................................................................................13 Right of Way Registration ...........................................................................................................13 Site and Building Plan Amendment (Minor) ...............................................................................13 Special Assessment Charge for Unpaid fine amounts that are assessed.....................................13 Special Assessment Interest Rate................................................................................................13 Special Computer Search (Police) ...............................................................................................13 Subdivision (Minor) .....................................................................................................................13 Tow to City Property (Police) ......................................................................................................13 Tree Contractor Registration.......................................................................................................13 Tree Removal...............................................................................................................................13 Vacant Building Registration.......................................................................................................13 Vacation – Street, Alley, Easement (Engineering) ......................................................................13 Video Taping Duplicating (Police) ...............................................................................................13 Weed Inspection .........................................................................................................................14 Well Water Test ..........................................................................................................................14 Zoning Letter ...............................................................................................................................14 Utility Recycling Utility (Quarterly rates)...............................................................................................15 Sanitary Sewer Utility (Quarterly rates) ......................................................................................15 Storm Sewer Utility (Quarterly rates) .........................................................................................15 Street Light Utility (Quarterly rates) ...........................................................................................15 Street and Storm Drainage Special Assessment Rates Partial Street Reconstruction....................................................................................................16 Pavement Rehabilitation ..........................................................................................................16 Water and Sanitary Sewer Connection........................................................................................16 Water Utility (Quarterly rates)....................................................................................................17 Appendix A Opportunity Site Stormwater Map..............................................................................................18 Page 79 of 155 1 City Clerk’s Office Licenses License Type Annual Fee Expiration City Code Reference Amusement Device $15/location, plus June 30 23-2101 Operator $15/machine Minn. Stat. 449.15 Res. 87-31 Kiddie Ride $10/ride Animals (Cats and Dogs) Commercial Kennel Res. No. 97-180 $100 September 30 1-102 Bowling Alley Res. No. 97-180 $20/alley December 31 23-209.01 Christmas Tree Sales Deposit Res. No. 97-180 $60/lot $100/lot January 5 23-1301 Edible Cannabinoid Sales License Background Check $450 $200 23-2701 Entertainment Res. No. 2020-17 $300 December 31 23-301 Filling Station First Nozzle/Hose Each Additional Nozzle/Hose Res. No. 2023-115 $100 $15 December 31 23-402 Filming & Photography $400 23-2500 Ord. No. 2017-02 Fireworks Temporary Stand Permanent Structure Res. No. 2004-65 $350/location $100/location December 31 19-403 Garbage and/or Rubbish Collection Company Vehicle Res. No. 2023-115 $250 $50 June 30 7-103 Hospitality Res. No. 2023-115 April 30 23-2401 Level I $200 Level II Level III $250 $350 Liquor – Civil Penalties Offense Civil Fine Suspension/Rev 1st Offense……..$ 500……… None 2nd Offense…… $1,000……..1 day Suspension 3rd Offense…… $1,500…….. 3 day Suspension 4th Offense…… $2,000….…. 5 day Suspension 5th Offense…… $2,000……..Revocation Res. No. 2019-116 11-107 Liquor – Consumption and Display Temporary (maximum 10 days for City) Res. No. 2017-203 $300 $25 December 31 N/A 11-106 Liquor – Off-Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor Res. No. 2017-203 $100 December 31 11-106 Liquor – Off-Sale Brew Pub Res. No. 2017-203 $200 December 31 11-106 Liquor – Off-Sale Microdistillery Res. No. 2017-203 $200 December 31 11-106 Page 80 of 155 2 License Type Annual Fee Expiration City Code Reference Liquor – Off-Sale Small Brewer License Res. No. 2017-203 $200 December 31 11-106 Liquor – On-Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor Temporary Res. No. 2017-203 $500 $10/day December 31 N/A 11-106 Liquor – On-Sale Brew Pub On-Sale Intoxicating On-Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Res. No. 2017-203 $6,500 $500 December 31 11-106 Liquor – On-Sale Brewer Taproom Res. No. 2017-203 $600 December 31 11-106 Liquor – On-Sale Club Up to 200 members 201-500 members 501-1,000 members 1,001-2,000 members 2,001-4,000 members 4,001-6,000 members Over 6,000 members $300 $500 $650 $800 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 December 31 11-106 Liquor – On-Sale Intoxicating Res. No. 2017-203 December 31 11-106 Hotels & Clubs $6,500 The Heritage Center of Brooklyn Center $5,000 Culinary Class $100 Liquor – On-Sale Microdistillery Cocktail Room Res. No. 2017-203 $600 December 31 11-106 Liquor – On-Sale Sunday Sales Res. No. 2017-203 $200 December 31 11-106 Liquor – On-Sale Temporary Maximum 3 consecutive days; no more than 12 days per year Special Event Permit Maximum 10 consecutive days; no more than 40 days per year $25/per day $25/per day 11-106 Liquor – On-Sale Wine Res. No. 2017-203 $2,000 December 31 11-106 Massage Establishment Res. No. 87-31 December 31 23-1703 Establishment $3,000 Investigation – Establishment $1,500 Masseur or Masseuse $50 Investigation – Masseur/Masseuse $100 Motor Vehicle Dealer Class A Class B Res. No. 97-180 $250 $75 April 30 23-1202 Pawnbroker Establishment Investigation Res. No. 2004-101 $3,000 $1,500 December 31 23-603 Page 81 of 155 3 License Type Annual Fee Expiration City Code Reference Rap Parlors, Conversation Parlors, Adult Encounter Res. No. 87-31 December 31 23-1804 Groups, Adult Sensitivity Groups, Escort Services, Model Services, Dancing Services, or Hostess Services $1,500 Investigation $1,500 Saunas or Sauna Baths Res. No. 87-31 December 31 23-1602 Establishment Investigation $3,000 $1,500 Secondhand Goods Dealer Res. No. 98-227 December 31 23-652 $750, plus $1.50 per reportable transaction Investigation $1,500 Sign Hanger Res. No. 97-180 $60 April 30 34-160 Special Events $100 application fee Additional fees may be charged 23-2600 Res. No 2022-25 Taxicab Res. No. 2004-101 $100/vehicle December 31 23-702 Tobacco Related Products Res. No. 2023-115 December 31 23-101 License Fee Investigation $300 $150 Page 82 of 155 Page 4 Community Development Permits/Licenses Permit Type Fee City Code Reference Building and Fire Protection 3-103 Valuation $1 to $1,000 Valuation $1,001 to $2,000 $49.50 for the first 1,000 plus $3.25 for Res. No. 2018-09 each additional $100 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000 Valuation of$2,001 to $25,000 $82.00 for the first $2,000 plus $14.85 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000 Valuation of $25,001 to $50,000 $423.55 for the first $25,000 plus $10.70 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000 Valuation of $50,001 to $100,000 $691.05 for the first $50,000 plus $7.45 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to including $100,00 Valuation of $100,001 to $500,000 $1,063.55 for the first $100,000 plus $6.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $500,00 Valuation of $500,001 to $1,000,000 $3,463.55 for the first $500,00 plus $5.10 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000 Valuation of $1,000,001 and up $6,013.55 for the first $1,000,000 plus $4 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof Plan Check Fee 65% of the amount of the permit fee Investigation Fee Same amount as building permit fee Residential Siding Replacement up to 4 units $150 per unit Residential Siding Replacement up to 4 units $150 per unit not including flat roofs Residential Solar Panel Installation $200 Egress Window $100 up to two windows; $150 for 3 more Window or Door Replacement $100 up to two windows, $150 for 3 or more Residential Deck up to 4 units $200 up to 120 sq ft $150; over 120 sq ft $250 Residential Driveway (non-ROW)$25 Residential Fence Inter-Agency Inspections (MDH or DHS) Residential Dwelling Conversion to Assisted Living $25 $150 $150 $500 M.S. 326B.103 Page 83 of 155 Page 5 Permit Type Fee City Code Reference Cesspool Cleaning Permit $18.75 7-502 Res. No. 87-32 Courtesy Bench 23-902 Permit $50/bench 23-903 Inspection $50/bench Res. No. 2007-47 Demolition Permit $50 $75 $150 23-1501 Res. No. 2005-65 $50 per trip 3-103 Res. No. 2020-20 $100 (includes two inspections) $110 $55 $160 includes two inspections $50 $100 per unit $190 includes three inspections $50 first unit plus $25 each additional unit $40 Electrical Minimum Fee for one inspection trip Two trip fee (Every job where wiring will be covered needs a rough-in and final inspection. Examples: remodel or new bath, kitchen, porch, basement, laundry, detached garage, swimming pool, etc.) Service changeout Temporary service Service changeout with one or two remodeled or added rooms Subpanel change out New or major remodel of apartment or condominium (this includes main service, feeders, house panel, circuit breakers, and temp power) Residential maximum (includes new houses, townhouses, remodels with 50% or more of the lights, receptacles and switches being replaced Outside electrical reinstalled after siding replacement, house, duplex, triplex, four-plex, attached townhouses, and apartments Electronic inspection fee for these items only: furnace, air conditioning, bath fan, fireplace, or receptacle for water heater vent. Must email require pictures. Solar fees for PV System: Residential & Commercial 0 – 5,000 watts 5,001 – 10,000 watts 10,001 – 20,000 watts 20,001 – 30,000 watts 30,001 – 40,000 watts $90 $150 $225 $300 $375 plus $25 for each additional Residential Commercial Page 84 of 155 Page 6 Commercial Electrical Fees Description Valuation $1 to $1,000 Valuation $1,001 to 2,000 Valuation $2,001 to $25,000 Valuation $25,001 to $50,000 Valuation $50,001 to $100,000 Valuation $100,001 to $500,000 Valuation $500,000 to $1,000,000 Valuation $1,000,000 and up Re-inspection Fee (in addition to all other fees) Investigation Fee (working without a permit) Refunds issued only for permits over Fee calculation $50.00 $50 for the first $1,000 plus $3.25 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000 $82.00 for the first $2,000 plus $14.85 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000 $423.55 for the first $25,000 plus $10.70 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000 $691.05 for the first $50,000 plus $7.45 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000 $1,063.55 for the first $100,000 plus $6.00 for each additional $1,0001,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000 $3,463.55 for the first $500,000 plus $5.10 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000 $6,013.55 for the first $1,000,000 plus $4 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof $50 $1 Page 85 of 155 Page 7 Permit Type Fee City Code Reference Flood Plain Use Up to 1 acre $50 35-2182 Res. No. 2005-65 1 acre to 5 acres $50/acre Over 5 acres $250 plus $37.50 per acre for each acre or fraction thereof over 5 acres House moving 23-1501 Permit $200 Res. No. 2005-65 Code Compliance Review Prior to Moving Structure $100 into City Land Disturbing Activities Permit Res. No. 2005-162 $50 35-235 35-7900 Mechanical Systems License Res. No. 97-180 $60 April 30 23-1500 Res. No. 2018-09 $25 $75 3-103 $25 $75 plus 2% of value of any amount in excess of $500 $1,012.50 plus 1% of value of any amount in excess of $50,000 65% of base permit fee $5.75 each $2.50 each $15 each $3.25 each $60 $75 $60 $125 $60 $75 $60 $100 $60 $75 $500 35-71300 $1,050 35-210 35-71300 $750 35-230 35-7600 $400 15-104 35-8106 $200 35-8107 $200 35-240 35-71000 $250 35-310 35-7800 $150 35-310 35-7800 $250 35-220 35-7700 $250 35-220 35-7700 $100 35-220 $200 35-251 35-7300 $1,800 35-355 35-8300 Mechanical Systems Valuation $0 to $500 Valuation $501 to $50,000 Valuation Over $50,000 Mechanical Plan Review (only when submitted without a building permit) 2” and less diameter pipe 1-3 fixtures Additional openings 2” and over diameter pipe 1-3 fixtures Additional opening Residential Air Conditioner Installation Residential Air Conditioner & Furnace Installation Residential Boiler or Fireplace up to 4 units Residential Furnace Installation Residential Gas Stove or Dryer up to 4 units Planning Commission Fees - For all Planning Commission Applications, a refundable escrow of $1,000 will be added to the fee to cover any additional costs associated with the review of the application. Additional escrows may be required subject to the determination of the City Planner. Zoning Code Text Amendment Rezonings Site and Building Plan and Major Amendments Preliminary Plat Final Plat Variance Interim Use Permit (IUP) IUP Extension/Amendment Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP Amendment Extension of Existing Special Use Permit Appeal Planned Unit Development (PUD) PUD Amendment - Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment $700 $1,050 35-355 35-8300 35-71200 Page 86 of 155 Page 8 Permit Type Fee City Code Reference Plumbing Minimum Fee Res. No. 2018-09 $25 $75 3-103 Repair or alteration of existing system 2% of estimated cost New residential or commercial building 2% of estimated cost Plumbing Plan Review (only when submitted without a building permit)65% of base permit fee Residential Water Heater up to 4 units $60 $85 Residential Water Softener up to 4 units $60 $85 Residential Water Heater and Softener up to 4 units $60 $85 Plumbing Fixtures RPZ Installation/Rebuild RPZ Test $60 $75 up to 3 fixtures; $10 $15 for each additional $50 (plus $1 state surcharge) $25(plus $1 state surcharge) Rental Single Family Dwelling Initial License/New Owner Renewal License (no change in license holder) Two Family Dwelling Each Rental Unit Multiple Family Dwelling Each Building Each Unit Minimum Base Fee License Reinstatement Conversion to Rental A residential property converted to a rental property, or a registered residential vacant building re- occupied as a rental property. This applies to lawful single-family and Single-family attached dwellings. Res. No. 2005-152 $400 $300 $200 $200 $18 $450; Res. No. 2011-65 $500; Res. No. 2008-150 12-901 12-910 12-902 Right-Of-Way Administration Fee Excavation Fee Obstruction Fee Res. No. 2018-42 $100 per permit $250 per permit $200 per permit 25-1009 Pole Attachment Fee Extension Penalties: Delay Penalty $1,500 per site $50 per permit $50/day for pavement; $25/day for boulevard/turf Sign 50 sq. ft in area or less Over 50 sq. ft in area Res. No. 2005-65 $50 $50/1st 50 sq. ft and $15.00 for 34-150 35-6000 Minimum Fee Footing inspection, when required each additional 50 sq. ft or fraction $50 $50 Temporary Sign $25 Page 87 of 155 Page 9 Community Center Daily Admission AGES RESIDENT NON-RESIDENT 2-14 & 62+$4 $6 15-61 $5 $7 Punch Cards Daily admission and punch cards provide daily access to all amenities included in a community center membership AGES 10 25 10 25 RESIDENT NON-RESIDENT 2-14 & 62+$38 $90 $57.50 $143.50 15-61 $47.50 $112.50 $67.50 $162.50 Memberships MONTHS 1 12 1 12 RESIDENT NON-RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL $23 $175 $38 $291 DUAL $29 $220 $48 $367 SENIOR $19 $164 $31 $273 HOUSEHOLD $32 $252 $53 $420 Page 88 of 155 Page 10 Miscellaneous Services Service Fee Abatement Application (Assessing) Taxpayer caused only (others no charge) $45 Abatement (City-Facilitated)/Administrative Service Charge $999 or less $1,000 or Higher Res. No. 2008-150 $75 $150 Accident Reports (Police)< 10 pages no charges $0.25 per page $0.15 per page, if subject of data $0.50 per report, commercial user [defined as a user who requests access to more than five reports per month M.S. § 169.09, Subd. 13(5) (f)] Administrative Penalty System Fees Level 1 $50 Level 2 Level 3 - Single Family - 2 - 4 Units - 5 plus Units $125 $100 $300 $500 $1,000 Maximum fine amount per violation per day cannot exceed $1,000 Violation Type (Ordinance reference)Level Waste container setback violation (7-102)1 Local Traffic and Parking (27) Parking Surface violation (12-316) 1 2 All other city code violations, designated as a 2 misdemeanor or petty misdemeanor Animal (10)2 Failure to register a vacant property (12-1500)2 Failure to obtain a permit or license 3 Tenant protection violation (12-912D)4 Appeal Filing Fee – Chapters 12 and 19 $50 Res. No. 2005-65 Alarm Fire Police 1st – No charge 2nd - $150 3rd - $300 1 -4 - No charge 5th - $50 After 5th alarm, each alarm increases by $25 Res. No. 93-233 Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Administrative Review $100 Beekeeping Registration $40 Res No. 2019-26 Page 89 of 155 Page 11 Service Fee Copy Charges for Public Government Data Requests Not from the Data Subject 100 Pages or Fewer Black and White Photocopies 8.5 x 11 or 8.5 x 14 Two-Sided Copy (8.5 x 11 or 8.5 x 14) All Other Public Government Data Requests The city will charge the requester actual costs of searching for and retrieving the data, including the cost of employee time, and for making, certifying, compiling, and transmitting copies of the data or the data themselves Exception: There will be no charges for searching, retrieving, compiling, and electronically transmitting readily available data Minn. Stat. 13.03, Subd. 3 (c) < 10 pages no charge $0.25 $0.50 Actual Costs Labor – $0.40 per minute Paper – $0.01 per sheet Black/White Photocopier – $0.01 per page Color Photocopier - $0.07 per page Black/White Printer – $0.02 per page Color LaserJet Printer – $0.09 per color page Other Actual Costs that may or may not be included – refer to the document Fees for Providing Copies of Public Government Data compiled by the State of Minnesota, Department of Administration, Information Policy Analysis Division at www.ipad.state.mn.us or 651-296-6733 Total Actual Costs require that you add labor cost at $0.40 per minute to the supply and materials costs to establish total actual costs Copy Charges for Public Government Data Requests by the Subject of Data When the requester is the subject of the data, the city will not charge for searching for and retrieving data. The requester will be charged the actual costs associated with making, certifying, compiling, or transmitting copies of the data themselves. Exception: There will be no charge for compiling and electronically transmitting readily available data. Actual Costs <10 pages no charge $0.15 per page Dogs Registration – Dangerous and Potentially Dangerous Contest Declaration Hearing Fee Review Declaration Hearing Fee $35/annual Res. No. 2004-132 $250 Res. No. 2014-43 $100 Res. No. 2014-43 Contest Sterilization Requirement for Potentially Dangerous $250 Res. No. 2015-31 Boarding Fee Joint & Cooperative Agreement Impounding Penalty with PUPS $31/day Fingerprinting (Police) Brooklyn Center resident or Brooklyn Center business owner and/or owner’s employees (Saturday 1:00 pm to 7:00 pm)$10/card Page 90 of 155 Page 12 Service Fee Franchise (Natural Gas) Residential Commercial A Commercial Industrial B Commercial C SVDF A SVDF B LVDF Franchise (Electric) Residential Small Commercial & Industrial – Non-Demand Small Commercial & Industrial – Demand Large Commercial & Industrial Public Street Lighting Municipal Pumping – Non-Demand Municipal Pumping – Demand Ord. No. 2019-03 $1.66/month $1.74/month $5.63/month $22.50/month $56.23/month $107.96/month $107.96/month Ord. No. 2023-08 $1.65/month $4.25/month $22.75/month $103.00/month $13.50/month $13.50/month $13.50/month Hearing Request Deposit $50 Res. No. 2011-55 No Charge No Charge $100 $150 $200 $50/each Res. No. 2009-130 Res. No. 2008-150 $100 $100 for each common area, plus $50 for each unit/Res. No. 2008-151 $115 $195 $195 $275 $415 Res. No. 2009-29 Inspections Fire Inspection, Commercial Initial Inspection First Re-Inspection Second Re-Inspection Third Re-Inspection Fourth and Subsequent Re-Inspections Fire Inspection, Daycare Re-inspection A re-inspection fee for the second re-inspection and each subsequent re-inspection shall be collected from the applicant, owner, or responsible party. Properties with 1 to 3 units Properties with 4 or more units Re-Occupancy Inspection - A property maintenance re-occupancy inspection fee is required for registered vacant buildings. Apartment/Condo Townhome Single Family Duplex (same owner) Triplex (same owner) Fourplex (same owner)$550 Res. No. 2009-29 Intoxilyzers Logs (Police)$5/page Lot Combination $100 Maps $3 8 1/2 x 11 $5 8 1/2 x 11 with Imaging (aerials)$4 11 x 17 $6 11 x 17 with Imaging (aerials)$10 24 x 24 $15 24 x 24 with Imaging (aerials) 23 x 36 $15 $25 23 x 36 with Imaging (aerials) NSF Check (Finance)$30 Page 91 of 155 Page 13 Service Fee Opportunity Site Stormwater Fee (per acre of developable property See Appendix A for map $97,250.18 Police Reports (Police)< 10 pages no charge $0.25 per page $0.15 per page, if subject of data $0.50 per page, commercial user PUD Amendment (Minor)$350 Public Subsidy Application Fee Escrow for consulting services related to review of application $3,000 $10,000 Site and Building Plan Amendment (minor)$375 Special Assessment Charge for unpaid fine amounts that are specially assessed $30 Special Assessment Interest Rate Res. No. 24-114 7 Percent (7%) Special Computer Search (Police)$7/each address Subdivision (Minor)$300 Tow to City Property (Police)Tow charge plus $15 admin fee Tree Contractor Registration Res. No. 2000-09 $35 Tree Removal Each non-assessed diseased tree /stump removed (by agreement) Special Assessment Service Charge Capitalized interest charge (assessed trees only) $50 $30/parcel in which a special assessment is levied $30/per tree Vacant Building Registration An annual registration fee shall be collected from the applicant, owner, or the party responsible. The categories shall apply to residential properties of 4 or fewer units: Category 1 – property vacant for less than 1 year and does not have any code violation or has not been issued a compliance notice for code violations. Category 2 – property vacant for less than 1 year and has a code violation(s) or has been issued a compliance notice for code violations. Category 3 – property vacant for 1 year or more. Category 4 – property vacant for 3 years or more. Below will apply to residential properties of 5 or more units and all commercial properties: Less than 10,000 sq ft Less than 10,000 sq ft and vacant for more than 1 year Less than 10,000 sq ft and vacant for more than 1 year More than 10,001 sq ft - $2,000 More than 10,001 sq ft and vacant for more than 1 year More than 10,001 sq ft and vacant for more than 2 years Res. No. 2008-151/2023-115 $100 $400 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $2.000 $5,000 $7,500 Page 92 of 155 Page 14 Service Fee Vacation – Street, Alley, Easement (Engineering)$125 Res. No. 92-132 Video Tape Duplicating (Police)$20 Weed Inspection/Removal Weed cutter’s fee Special assessment service charge Capitalized interest charge (assessed weeds only) Res. No. 2000-09 $60/hour $30 per parcel on which a special assessment is levied $10 per notice Well Water Test $10 Zoning Letter (Community Development)$75 Page 93 of 155 Page 15 Utility Services Service Fee Recycling Utility Minimum charge per household per quarter Certification for collection with property taxes Res. No. 2024-137 $24.84/quarter $50 Sanitary Sewer Utility Base Rate Quarterly Residential Single Family Apartment Senior Citizen Non-Residential Rate SAC Charges set by MCES Certification with property taxes Line cleaning charge Sanitary Sewer Connection Res. No. 2024-134 $112.68 $79.61 $61.97 $4.79 per 1,000 gallons Fee established by MCES $50 Labor, materials, equipment and overhead Established annually by resolution Storm Sewer Utility (quarterly rates) Base Rate Cemeteries and Golf Course Parks Single Family, Duplex, Townhouse School, Government Buildings Multiple Family, Churches Commercial, Industrial Vacant Land Certification for collection with property taxes Private facility cleaning charge Res. No, 2024-135 $81.42 per acre $20.36 per acre $40.71 per acre $20.36/lot $101.78 per acre $244.29 per acre $303.17 per acre As assigned $50 Labor, materials, equipment and overhead Street Light Utility (quarterly rates) Single, Double, and Multiple Family Residential Parks Schools, Government Buildings, Churches Retail and Service-Office Commercial and Industrial Vacant Land and Open Space Certification for collection with property taxes Res. No. 2024-136 $8.83/dwelling unit $15.03 $30.08 $45.10 $45.10 As Assigned $50 Page 94 of 155 Page 16 Street and Storm Drainage Special Assessment Rates Land Use R-1 zoned, used as one-family that cannot be subdivided R-2 zoned, used as a two-family site that cannot be subdivided R-3 zoned (per unit) Partial Street Construction R-1 zoned, used one-family that cannot be subdivided R-2 zoned, or used as a two-family site that cannot be subdivided R-3 zoned (per unit) Pavement Rehabilitation R-1 zoned, used one-family that cannot be subdivided R-2 zoned, or used as a two-family site that cannot be subdivided R-3 zoned (per unit) The residential assessment rates for street and storm drainage construction and pavement rehabilitation shall not apply to R-4 and R-5 zoned districts. The assessment rates for street reconstruction and pavement rehabilitation for R-4 and R-5 zoned property shall be based on evaluation of the project cost and the project benefit for each project. Res. No. 24-115 $5,338 per lot (street) $1,601 per lot (storm drainage) $71.1733 per front foot with a $5,338 per lot minimum (street) $21.3467 per front foot with a $1,601 per lot minimum (storm drainage) Assessable frontage x $71.1733 (street) Number of residential units Assessable frontage x $21.3467 (storm) Number of residential units $4,002 per lot (street) $53.3600 per front foot with a $4,002 per lot minimum (street) Assessable frontage x $53.3600 (street) Number of residential units $1,764 per lot (street) $23.5200 per front foot with a $1,764 per lot minimum (street) Assessable frontage x $23.5200 (street) Number of residential units Water and Sanitary Sewer Connection Commercial/Industrial Water > 5 Acres Commercial/Industrial Sewer > 5 Acres Commercial/Industrial Water < 5 Acres Commercial/Industrial Sewer < 5 Acres Retail/Office Water > 5 Acres Retail/Office Sewer > 5 Acres Retail/Office Water < 5 Acres Retail/Office Sewer < 5 Acres Multi Family Water > 5 Acres Multi Family Sewer > 5 Acres Multi Family Water < 5 Acres Multi Family Sewer < 5 Acres Water per connection Single Family Sewer per connection Res. No. 2001-161 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $3,000 $5,000 $3,000 $3,000 $1,500 $5,000 $3,000 $3,000 $1,500 $1,000 $1,000 Page 95 of 155 Page 17 Water Utility Water Conservation Rate 5/8” and ¾” meter 0-30,000 gallons per quarter 30,001-60,000 gallons per quarter 60,001 or more gallons per quarter Base Rate Quarterly minimum rate 1” meter 1 1/2 “ meter 2” meter 3” meter 4” meter 6” meter 8” meter 10” meter Water Meter Charge 5/8” or 3/4” Water Meter Charge larger than 3/4" Certification for collection with property tax Quarterly fire service line charge Fire Protection inspection Private hydrant maintenance Service restoration, Monday – Friday (except holidays) Between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Service restoration, Saturday, Sunday and holidays Between the hours of 3:00 p.m. and 7:30 a.m. Assistance with seasonal shut-down and restoration of commercial irrigation systems, Monday – Friday (except holidays) Between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Hydrant Meters (water use will be billed at the commercial rate in addition to the meter rental fee) 5/8” or 3/4” meter Deposit Rental fee (per month or portion thereof) 3” meter Deposit Rental fee (per month or portion thereof) Penalty for violation of odd-even sprinkling Water Conservation Violations (based on preceding 12-month period) First offense Second offense Subsequent offenses Res. No. 2024-133 $28.49 $4.75 per 1,000 gallons $5.93 per 1,000 gallons $8.84 per 1,000 gallons $82.76 $106.41 $206.92 $413.92 $697.76 $1,596.60 $3,023.88 $4,031.86 $149.00 Actual cost + $2.00 $50 $12.50/Res. No. 2007-140 $52 Labor, materials, equipment and overhead $31 $83 $45/ hour with 1 hour minimum $250 $25 $2,500 $150 $25 Res. No. 2020-80 Warning $25 $50 Page 96 of 155 Page 18 APPENDIX A Page 97 of 155 Page 19 Page 98 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Ian Alexander, Economic Development Manager, Amy Loegering, Associate Planner THROUGH: Jesse Anderson, Community Development Director BY: Amy Loegering, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Resolution Affirming Acceptance of Minnesota Department of Transportation Grant Funds Requested Council Action: Motion to approve a Resolution affirming acceptance of Minnesota Department of Transportation Grant Funds Through State Funded Program fo IIJA Discretionary Grant Assistance SAP 109-579-001. Background: Background: Staff request that the City Council approve the Minnesota Department of Transportation form Resolution as the Council has already approved the Minnesota Department of Transportation technical assistance grant by Resolution No. 2024-081 dated July 22, 2024, and staff have submitted the IIJA grant per Council’s Resolution No. 2024-86 dated September 22, 2024, for which the technical assistance grant was obtained. The current resolution, using the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s approved form, is required to release the funds from the Minnesota Department of Transportation technical assistance grant to reimburse the City. On June 22, 2024, Council passed Resolution No. 2024-081, authorizing the Economic Development Manager to accept Minnesota Department of Transportation technical assistance grant funds to prepare a grant application to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods Grant Program (“Reconnecting Neighborhoods Grant”). The purpose of the Reconnecting Neighborhoods Grant is to study the area around the John Martin Drive bridge over Trunk Highway 100, which the Minnesota Department of Transportation intends to remove during maintenance of Trunk Highway 100 currently scheduled for approximately 2028. On September 9, 2024, the Council passed Resolution No. 2024-86, authorizing the Economic Development Manager to submit a Reconnecting Neighborhoods Grant application. The application has been prepared and submitted and the Minnesota Department of Transportation technical assistance grant funds have been spent. The Minnesota Department of Transportation requires the use of their form resolution to release their grant funds to pay for the technical assistant related to preparing the Reconnecting Neighborhoods Grant application. Therefore, the Minnesota Department of Transportation form Resolution is submitted to the Council with the request that Council approve this resolution as Council has already authorized the Minnesota Department of Transportation technical assistance grant. Page 99 of 155 Budget Issues: There is no requirement for matching funds for the Minnesota Department of Transportation technical assistance grant. Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution Affirming MN DOT Technical Assistance Grant 2. Resolution re MNDoT Technical Assistance Grant 3. Resolution re IIJA Reconnecting Communities Grant Page 100 of 155 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION AFFIRMING ACCEPTANCE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GRANT FUNDS THROUGH STATE FUNDED PROGRAM FOR IIJA DISCRETIONARY GRANT ASSISTANCE SAP 109-589-001 WHEREAS, City of Brooklyn Center has applied to the Commissioner of Transportation for a grant from the State Program for IIJA Assistance, as authorized by its Resolution No. 2024-081; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation has given notice that funding for this project is available; and WHEREAS, the amount of the grant has been determined to be $30,000.00 by reason of the lowest responsible bid; NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that City of Brooklyn Center does hereby agree to the terms and conditions of the grant consistent with Minnesota Laws 2023, Chapter 68, Article 1, Section 2, Subdivision 5(a), and will pay any additional amount by which the cost exceeds the estimate and will return any amount appropriated for the project but not required. The proper City officers are authorized to execute a grant agreement and any amendments thereto with the Commissioner of Transportation concerning the above-referenced grant. Date Mayor ATTEST: The motion for the adoption of the forgoing resolution was duly seconded by: and upon vote duly taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 101 of 155 Page 102 of 155 Page 103 of 155 Page 104 of 155 Page 105 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Lydia Ener, Assistant City Engineer THROUGH: Elizabeth Heyman, Director of Public Works BY: Lydia Ener, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids, Improvement Project No. 2025-02, 67th Avenue and James Avenue Mill & Overlay Requested Council Action: Motion to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids, Improvement Project No. 2025-02, 67th Avenue and James Avenue Mill & Overlay Background: On September 23, 2024, the City Council received the project feasibility report and called for a public hearing to be held on October 28, 2024 to consider these improvements. At that meeting, the City Council ordered the improvements and directed staff to prepare plans and specifications for the project. Construction plans, specifications, and contract documents have been prepared for the project. The overall scope of the project remains consistent with improvements outlined in the feasibility study. Staff is prepared to begin the project bidding process upon authorization from the City Council. The bidding process would involve the advertisement of the project in the City’s official newspaper and in Finance and Commerce. Sealed bids will be collected through in- person bidding, opened at the scheduled bid opening date, and tabulated by the City Clerk and City Engineer. Staff anticipates that the bid results will be presented to the City Council for consideration in March 2025. Budget Issues: The total project cost is estimated to be $790,000. The total amount proposed to be assessed is $379,980.46. Funding sources for the project are budgeted from sources as described in the project feasibility report previously accepted by the City Council. The special assessment rates were adopted by the City Council on November 25, 2024. Inclusive Community Engagement: Staff conducted a public informational meeting with property owners on August 29, 2024. An Improvement Public Hearing was held on October 28, 2024, to receive public comments pertaining to the proposed improvements. An Assessment Public Hearing will be held on January 13, 2025. Page 106 of 155 Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: NA Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 67th & James_Approve Plans and Specs Res Page 107 of 155 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. _______________ RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2025-02, 67TH AVENUE AND JAMES AVENUE MILL & OVERLAY WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center City Council, by Resolution No. 2024-108, ordered Improvement Project No. 2025-02 and authorized the preparation of plans and specifications for the improvements; and WHEREAS, said plans and specifications have been prepared under the direction of the City Engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The plans and specifications for Improvement Project No. 2025-02, 67th Avenue and James Avenue Mill & Overlay are hereby approved, ordered, and filed with the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper and in Finance and Commerce an advertisement for bids for the making of such improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, shall specify the work to be done, and state the time and location at which bids will be opened by the City Clerk and City Manager or their designees. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the City Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier’s check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City of Brooklyn Center for five percent of the amount of such bid. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 108 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Lydia Ener, Assistant City Engineer THROUGH: Elizabeth Heyman, Director of Public Works BY: Lydia Ener, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Accepting Work Performed and Authorizing Final Payment, Improvement Project Nos. 2023-04 and 05, 2023 Trail and Parking Lot Improvements Requested Council Action: Motion to approve a resolution accepting work performed and authorizing final payment, Improvement Project Nos. 2023-04 and 05, 2023 Trail and Parking Lot Improvements Background: On June 12, 2023, the City Council awarded Improvement Project Nos. 2023-04 and 05, 2023 Trail and Parking Lot Improvements to Bituminous Roadways, Inc. of Mendota Heights, Minnesota for construction. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. has successfully completed the construction work and is requesting final payment for the project. Budget Issues: The original contract amount with GMH Asphalt Corporation for the project improvements was $609,884.85. The total value of work certified for final payment is $636,212.70. The total project cost including contingencies/administration/engineering/legal is $786,557.24 and was completed 13 percent under the budget total project cost of $905,684.85. The attached resolution provides a summary of the final amended costs and funding sources for the project. Inclusive Community Engagement: NA Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: NA Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2023 Trails - Final Payment - Res Page 109 of 155 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. _______________ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2023-04 AND 05, 2023 TRAIL AND PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, Bituminous Roadways, Inc. of Mendota Heights has completed the following improvements in accordance with said contract: Improvement Project Nos. 2023-04 and 05, 2023 Trail and Parking Lot Improvements NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that 1. Final payment shall be made on Improvement Project Nos. 2023-04 and 05, 2023 Trail and Parking Lot Improvements, taking the contractor’s receipt in full. The total amount to be paid for said improvements under said contract shall be $636,212.70. 2. The estimated project costs and revenues are hereby amended as follows: COSTS Original Award As Final Contract $609,884.85 $636,212.70 Contingency $ 61,000.00 $ -0- Subtotal Construction Cost $670,884.85 $636,212.70 Admin/Legal/Engr. $234,800.00 $150,344.54 Total Estimated Project Cost $905,684.85 $786,557.24 REVENUES Original Award As Final Capital Project Funds $905,384.85 $786,257.24 Miscellaneous (plan sales) $ 300.00 $ 300 Total Estimated Revenue $905,684.85 $786,557.24 Page 110 of 155 RESOLUTION NO. _______________ January 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 111 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Barb Suciu, City Clerk SUBJECT: Appointments to the Shingle Creek/West Mississippi Watershed District Requested Council Action: - motion to appoint David Mulla to the Shingle Creek/West Mississippi Watershed commissioner and Dave Vlasin as alternate commissioner. Background: These appointments are for the Shingle Creek/West Mississippi Watershed District. David Mulla and Dave Vlasin have been serving in these positions for several years. Budget Issues: None Inclusive Community Engagement: None Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: None Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: None Page 112 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Kory Andersen Wagner, Public Works Planner THROUGH: Elizabeth Heyman, Director of Public Works BY: Kory Andersen Wagner, Public Works Planner SUBJECT: Resolution Acknowledging Awarded Funds for the Hennepin County Youth Activities Grant and Authorizing Acceptance of Grant Funds Requested Council Action: Motion to approve a resolution acknowledging the awarded funds for the Hennepin County Youth Activities Grant and authorizing acceptance of grant funds. Background: The City of Brooklyn Center applied for and was awarded $100,000 through the Hennepin County Youth Activities Grant to upgrade playground surfaces at six parks: Bellvue, Centennial, Centennial West, Firehouse, Lion’s, and Northport. These playgrounds are highly utilized by the community, particularly the City’s diverse and young population, where 18% of residents are under 10 years old. The grant-funded improvements involve the installation of pour-in-place surfaces, durable and low-maintenance material that enhances playground safety and accessibility for children of all abilities. This project aligns with Brooklyn Center’s commitment to providing equitable access to quality recreational spaces and addressing disparities in park and playground facilities. The upgrades will replace outdated bark chip surfaces with seamless, impact-absorbing materials, ensuring compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards and promoting inclusivity for children with mobility challenges. Community engagement in the planning process, including surveys and listening sessions, demonstrated resident support for these improvements. Additional Information: The Hennepin County Youth Activities Grant supports projects that enhance recreational opportunities for youth, ensuring equitable access to safe, engaging play spaces. The goals of the initiative include: • Increasing recreational opportunities for diverse and underserved populations. • Promoting accessibility and inclusivity in public facilities. • Supporting community well-being through quality play environments. The proposed upgrades align with these goals, contributing to the City’s efforts to improve the quality of life for residents while fostering a sense of community. The project is slated for completion in the summer of 2025, with a ribbon-cutting ceremony planned in the fall. Page 113 of 155 Budget Issues: The total project cost is $284,739.01. Hennepin County awarded the City $100,000, and the remaining $184,739.01 will be funded through the City’s Park Improvements fund as part of the 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution for Accepting the Pour in Place Grant 2. HCYAG_Fall_2024_Play_Area_Application_BrooklynCenter 3. HCYAG Notice of Award - City of Brooklyn Center Page 114 of 155 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. _______________ RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING AWARDED FUNDS FOR THE HENNEPIN COUNTY YOUTH ACTIVITIES GRANT AND AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Youth Activities Grant provides funds to help communities enhance recreational opportunities for youth and support equitable access to safe and inclusive play areas; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center applied for the Hennepin County Youth Activities Grant to upgrade playground surfaces with pour-in-place materials at six city parks: Bellvue, Centennial, Centennial West, Firehouse, Lion’s, and Northport; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has been awarded $100,000 through the Hennepin County Youth Activities Grant to implement these improvements, complementing the City’s commitment of $184,739.01 from its Park Improvements fund; and WHEREAS, the proposed playground improvements include durable and low- maintenance surfaces made from recycled materials, aligning with the City’s sustainability goals and enhancing the overall quality of life for the community; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The City Council authorizes the City Manager to accept the grant funds awarded on behalf of the City and to execute all agreements and documents necessary to implement the project. 2. The City Council directs staff to proceed with the planning and execution of the playground upgrades at the identified locations, ensuring adherence to grant requirements and community priorities. January 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Page 115 of 155 and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 116 of 155 HCYAG 1 Play Area Grant Application Fall 2024 Submit your application via the Hennepin County Supplier Portal. Applications should be completed in size 10, 11 or 12 black font. No other font colors will be accepted. Font options include Times New Roman, Segoe or Garamond. Font should be clearly laid out and easy to read. Section 1: Applicant Information Name of Local Government Unit (LGU) applying for funding City of Brooklyn Center Legal address of LGU 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 LGU Grant Contact Name Kory Andersen Wagner Professional Title Public Works Planner Email kanderwag@brooklyncentermn.gov Phone (763) 913-2490 Signatory Authority (Name, Professional Title) Elizabeth Heyman, Public Works Director Signatory Email eheyman@brooklyncentermn.gov Delegation of Authority (Name, Email, Phone) N/A Partner Organization(s) N/A Partner Organization Contact (Name, Email, Phone) N/A Project Title Brooklyn Center Pour-in-Place Playground Upgrade Site Locations(s) Bellvue, Centennial, Centennial West, Firehouse, Lion’s, and Northport Applying for: ☐ Youth Sports Facility ☒ Playground ☐ Other: Click or tap here to enter text. Is this a new project, upgrade to existing structure, or replacement of equipment? ☐ New ☒ Upgrade ☐ Replacement ☐ Other: Click or tap here to enter text. Number of youths served (numerical value only) 6000 Total Grant Request (currency value only) $284,739.01 Page 117 of 155 HCYAG 2 Section 2: Project Proposal 2.1 Statement of Need 1. Provide information on the need for grant funding for this project. 1-3 paragraphs The City of Brooklyn Center is applying for the Hennepin County Youth Activities Play Area Grant to help fund the installation of pour-in-place playground surfaces across the City. Pour-in-place playground surfaces enhance the safety and accessibility of these spaces for all children. Brooklyn Center is the most diverse City in Minnesota. Nearly a quarter of the City's residents are immigrants, and over a third speak a language other than English at home. The City also has a very young population, with a median age of 32.4 years, compared to the state median of 39 years. Additionally, 18% of residents are under ten years old, higher than the statewide figure of 12%. Furthermore, 40% of households in Brooklyn Center have children (<18 years old), which is well above the County and Metro percentage. The City is also low-income, with the median household earning $70,692 annually – just three-quarters of the median Hennepin County resident ($92,595). Given the lower incomes, the City has a limited capacity to fund playground and park improvements consistently. Considering the significant youth population in Brooklyn Center, the impact of the Play Area Grant would be considerable. 2. Describe the upgrades or need for the structure at the proposed site location(s). Attach pictures of the current site and project planning maps for the proposed project as supplemental documentation. 1-2 paragraphs Brooklyn Center plans to upgrade 9,241 square feet of playground surfaces to pour-in-place surfaces. The playgrounds selected have a high percentage of youth under 10 in the area, are destination playgrounds, and are heavily used during events and after-school / summer programming. The parks are Bellvue, Centennial, Centennial West, Firehouse, Lion’s, and Northport. Lion’s Park is in a census block group where 30% of the population is under ten years old. The lowest is Centennial West at 17%, but this location is known for hosting events that attract kids beyond the census block group. Pour-in-place offers enhanced safety by providing consistent impact absorption and reducing injury risks. Additionally, the surface improves accessibility, allowing easy navigation for children with disabilities. Pour- in-place surfaces offer significant maintenance advantages over traditional bark chips—the current surface used at the six playgrounds. Unlike bark chips, which require regular replenishment and can scatter, these surfaces are durable and low-maintenance, withstanding various weather conditions and heavy use. 3. Provide information about the project planning and design process. Include information about community surveys, listening sessions or other ways community feedback was included during the planning and design process. Page 118 of 155 HCYAG 3 1-2 paragraphs The planning and design process for the playground upgrades in Brooklyn Center has been comprehensive and inclusive. While developing Brooklyn Center's first Park Capital Investment Plan in 2024, City staff engaged with nearly 1,000 residents through in-person and online platforms, including community surveys and listening sessions. The feedback showed a strong desire for investment in existing facilities and playground improvements. Notably, youth under 18 years old represented nearly 20% of the survey participants, ensuring that the voices of younger residents were well represented in the planning process. This emphasis on community involvement ensures that the proposed upgrades align with residents' priorities and reasserts Brooklyn Center's unwavering commitment to meeting their needs. 2.2 Project Overview 1. Describe the proposed play area (youth sports facility, playground, or structure upgrade). 1-3 paragraphs The proposed project involves upgrading six playgrounds across Brooklyn Center with pour-in-place surfaces. The surface is a rubberized material mixed on-site and poured over existing playground structures to create a continuous, seamless layer. It consists of a resilient rubber base and a top layer of EPDM (ethylene propylene diene monomer) rubber, which provides shock absorption and durability. The process involves preparing the playground area by removing existing materials and leveling the ground. The rubber mixture is then poured and spread to form a smooth, cushioned surface that conforms to the shape of the playground equipment and ground contours. This method ensures a consistent, impact- absorbing surface that enhances safety by reducing the risk of injuries from falls. 2. What methods will be used to reduce barriers, mitigate negative impact, and ensure the project is inclusive, accessible, and considers the needs of diverse populations? 1-2 paragraphs To ensure the playground upgrade project is inclusive, accessible, and considerate of diverse populations, several methods will be employed: • Inclusive Design: The pour-in-place surfaces will be designed to accommodate children of all abilities. This includes ensuring the playground equipment is accessible to children with disabilities and that the surfaces are smooth and even to facilitate easy navigation for wheelchairs and mobility devices. This is currently a challenge with the existing bark chips. • Accessibility Standards: The design and installation of the pour-in-place surfaces will adhere to established accessibility standards, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This will ensure that the playgrounds are accessible to children with various physical and sensory needs. 3. Who will benefit from the proposed project? Address whether this project will benefit populations who have been underserved or have experienced structural or institutional inequality. 1-2 paragraphs Page 119 of 155 HCYAG 4 The proposed playground upgrades will significantly benefit residents across Brooklyn Center, particularly young families and those seeking affordable activities to do with their children. As previously noted, Brooklyn Center is the most diverse City in Minnesota. Brooklyn Center is also low-income. The median household income is nearly 30% lower than that of Hennepin County, and 18% of the population is under ten years old. Given this dynamic, the Hennepin County grant would significantly impact young families. As of 2022, 23% of Brooklyn Center’s residents are foreign-born, compared to 9% of Minnesotans. Establishing oneself in a new country can be challenging, and foreign-born individuals often face barriers to accessing resources and opportunities. The proposed pour-in-place surfaces will not only ensure that playgrounds are welcoming and usable for children of all abilities but also foster community cohesion. This investment will enhance the quality of life for Brooklyn Center’s residents and promote equitable access to recreational opportunities for all. 4. Include the number of kids who will benefit from the project. How was this number estimated? What data sources were used to calculate or estimate the number of kids who will benefit from the project? 1-2 paragraphs The proposed playground upgrades will benefit approximately 6,000 children under 10 in Brooklyn Center based on their proximity to the playgrounds. This estimation is based on the United States Census American Community Survey 2022 ACS 5-Year Estimate (B01001 Sex by Age). This number is more given that the playgrounds identified for upgrade are often used for annual events, with kids traveling from outside of Brooklyn Center to use the structures. 5. Describe whether the project will be located on public land and whether the space will be publicly accessible. If it will not be publicly accessible or will have limited accessibility, describe the reasons why. 1 paragraph The playground upgrades will be in public parks across Brooklyn Center and accessible during standard park hours. All locations are on public land, ensuring the improvements are available to the entire community. Some neighboring schools will also benefit from the upgrades as they use the City parks for recess and after- school programs. 6. Describe planned signage for the project. Include pictures of planned signage or highlight signage on the site planning map included with your application. 1 paragraph Signage at the site acknowledging Hennepin County Youth Activities Grants as a funder is required. Grant funding can cover the cost to purchase and install a sign at the site and should be listed in the Grant Funding Request section if you plan to use grant funds to cover the cost of signage. The planned signage for the playground upgrades will prominently acknowledge the support of the Hennepin County Youth Activities Grants. Each sign will include, "Funding for this project provided by the Page 120 of 155 HCYAG 5 2024 Hennepin Youth Activities Grant." The signage will also feature the official logos provided by Hennepin County to ensure consistent and clear recognition of the grant funding. These signs will be installed at each upgraded playground location, positioned for high visibility to inform the community of the project's funding source. The design will be durable and weather-resistant, maintaining legibility and appearance over time. This example signage from 2023 will be updated and serve as a public acknowledgment of the financial support received and the positive impact of the Hennepin County Youth Activities Grants in the community's recreational spaces. 7. Describe sustainability for the proposed project, including ongoing operating or maintenance funds, the environmental impact of the project, and the impact of creating a play area for the community. 1-2 paragraphs The proposed project is designed with sustainability in mind. Pour-in-place surfaces are low-maintenance and highly durable, reducing the need for frequent upkeep compared to traditional materials like bark chips. The City's existing park management budget will support this longevity, covering ongoing maintenance costs through regular inspections. Environmental sustainability is also a key consideration. The pour-in-place surfaces are made from recycled rubber, which helps reduce landfill waste and minimizes resource consumption by eliminating the need to replace playground materials frequently. Additionally, the upgraded playgrounds will foster physical activity, social interaction, and community cohesion, enhancing the quality of life for residents and supporting the well-being of children and families in Brooklyn Center. 2.3 Collaborations and Partnerships 1. What entities and organizations will be involved in the proposed project? Describe the role of the Local Government Unit (LGU). If the LGU will be serving as the fiscal agent, provide information about the implementing agency including organizational capacity to implement the project. 1-2 paragraphs The City of Brooklyn Center will be the Local Government Unit (LGU) for the entire project. As the LGU, the Page 121 of 155 HCYAG 6 Brooklyn Center will oversee all aspects of the playground upgrades, including project planning, execution, and coordination. The City is well-equipped to manage this initiative, with a history of successful park improvements and experienced staff in contracting and project management. This organizational capacity ensures that the project will be implemented effectively and efficiently, leveraging the City's expertise and resources. This reassures the stakeholders about the City's commitment to enhancing recreational facilities across Brooklyn Center. 2.4 Implementation Timeline 1. Include a proposed timeline for project implementation and grant fund usage. The playground upgrade project is planned to occur during the summer of 2025. The timeline for implementation is as follows: • Early 2025: Hire the contractor to begin preparations and project planning. • April 2025: Commence the park improvements, starting with site preparations and initial work. • Summer 2025: Execute the playground upgrades at all designated locations. • Early Fall 2025: Complete the installation of pour-in-place surfaces and finalize all improvements. This schedule ensures that the project is completed efficiently, with all upgrades in place by early fall 2025, utilizing grant funds effectively throughout the implementation period. 2. Include information about planned groundbreaking ceremonies, ribbon cuttings or other public events for the site. 1 paragraph To celebrate the completion of the playground upgrades, the City of Brooklyn Center will host a public ribbon-cutting ceremony in the fall of 2025 at Centennial Park. This event will mark the official opening of the newly upgraded play areas and allow the community to unite and celebrate. Section 3: Grant Funding Request Include a line-item budget with a narrative explanation about the grant funding being requested. Listed expenses should be allowable, necessary, and reasonable. Allowable means that the listed items are consistent with Section 1.3 of the Request for Applications (RFA). Necessary means it is important to the success of the project, reasonable means you are listing fair market prices. 3.1 Grant Request 1. Total project cost (currency value only): $284,739.01 Page 122 of 155 HCYAG 7 2. If the total project cost exceeds the grant request, explain what costs will not be covered by grant funding. 1-2 paragraphs The City is requesting $100,000 from Hennepin County to supplement the City’s contribution of $184,739.01. The City funds come from the City’s Park Improvements fund in the City Council approved 2025 Capital Improvement Program. 3. Describe the amount of grant funds you are requesting and provide a narrative justification for the requested amount. 1-3 paragraphs The City of Brooklyn Center requests $100,000 from the Hennepin County Youth Activities Grants to supplement the City's contribution of $184,739.01 for the playground upgrade project. This funding will cover the costs of installing durable, low-maintenance pour-in-place surfaces at multiple playgrounds across the City. The grant will enable the City to enhance the safety and accessibility of these public play areas, ensuring that they meet the needs of our diverse and young population. The requested amount is calculated to bridge the gap between the City's budget and the total cost. With Brooklyn Center having a low household income, nearly 30% lower than that of Hennepin County, it is challenging, if not impossible, for the City to fund park improvements without grants. This funding will allow the City to provide high-quality spaces that are inclusive and accessible to all residents, benefiting young families and children who rely on these playgrounds for physical activity, social interaction, and community connection. 4. Include descriptions and pricing information of anticipated items for which you will be requesting grant reimbursement in the table below. Attach pricing information for proposed equipment and construction costs from vendors in supplemental documentation. If pricing information is not available, provide an explanation. If additional space is needed, attach a supplemental document with a table showing additional line items. GRANT BUDGET Project Item Description and Justification Cost EXAMPLE Paint Supplies Paint Brushes, 4 sets at $12/set Acrylic paint in multiple colors, 10 colors at $5/paint $98 1 Mobilization Mobilization of Installation Crew to Job Site (Trailer Skid Steer Augur, Tools, Mixer, Etc. $1,580.39 2 Removal of EWF (12" of Material) Excavation & Footing Spoils Redistributed or Piled Neatly on Site $4,368.85 3 Hauling of Excavated Material (CY) Trucking costs to remove material from the project location to the disposal site $2,633.09 Page 123 of 155 HCYAG 8 4 Disposal of Excavated Material (CY) Cost to dispose of material at approved site $2,633.09 5 Contingency Unknown costs associated with removal of existing synthetic turf $1,404.80 6 Compacted Aggregate Base (Recycled Concrete or Class 5) (Tons) Material & Install 4" - 6" Compacted $10,355.71 7 Drain Tile (LF) Wrapped w/ Clear Agg - Drain Stubs Required Inside Container $0.00 8 Poured In Place Rubber Surfacing (Sq. Ft.) 50/50 mix of Standard Colors/Black Speckled $67,933.16 9 Site Security 24 Hr. Site Security required during Installation & Cure Time. Cure Times vary with weather and thickness. Defects or damage due to trespass before enough cure time will not be covered by warranty. $9,090.91 10 Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. TOTAL GRANT REQUEST $100,000.00 5. Describe additional sources of funding for the project that will cover costs exceeding grant funding. Include information about matching funds. 1-2 paragraphs To cover costs that exceed the grant funding, the City of Brooklyn Center will utilize its park improvements funds. These funds are allocated specifically for enhancing and maintaining public parks, ensuring that any additional expenses related to the playground upgrades can be met. The City’s commitment to investing in its parks demonstrates a robust financial strategy to support the project beyond the scope of the grant. This approach ensures that the project can proceed as planned, with comprehensive funding to cover all necessary improvements. PROJECT MATCHING FUNDS Matching Fund Source Description Amount 1 Mobilization Mobilization of Installation Crew to Job Site (Trailer Skid Steer Augur, Tools, Mixer, Etc. $2,919.61 2 Removal of EWF (12" of Material) Excavation & Footing Spoils Redistributed or Piled Neatly on Site $8,070.96 3 Hauling of Excavated Material (CY) Trucking costs to remove material from the project location to the disposal site $4,864.35 4 Disposal of Excavated Material (CY) Cost to dispose of material at approved site $4,864.35 5 Contingency Unknown costs associated with removal of existing synthetic turf $2,595.20 Page 124 of 155 HCYAG 9 TOTAL MATCHING $184,739.01 Section 4: Additional Information Provide a narrative of any additional information deemed relevant to your application. Project Matching Funds Continued - The cell formatting does not allow for additional rows. These are the remaining rows: Compacted Aggregate Base (Recycled Concrete or Class 5) (Tons) - $19,131.03 Drain Tile (LF) - Wrapped w/ Clear Agg - Drain Stubs Required Inside Container - $0.00 Poured In Place Rubber Surfacing (Sq. Ft.) - 50/50 mix of Standard Colors/Black Speckled - $125,499.04 Site Security - 24 Hr. Site Security required during Installation & Cure Time. Cure Times vary with weather and thickness. Defects or damage due to trespass before enough cure time will not be covered by warranty - $16,794.47 Section 5: Supplemental Documents Indicate whether you will be uploading additional documents with your application: ☒ City Resolution If a city resolution is not available at the time of application submission, please provide an explanation of why one was not included. If applicable, provide a timeline for receiving and submitting the city resolution: Click or tap here to enter text. ☒ Site pictures ☒ Project plans and/or maps ☒ Community letters of support (optional) ☒ Other: Click or tap here to enter text. Page 125 of 155 HCYAG 10 Application Checklist Before submitting your application to the Supplier Portal, check that you have completed all sections of the application and have a signed attestation letter: ☒ Attestation Letter ☒ Completed Application ☒ Section 1: Applicant Information ☐ Section 2: Project Proposal ☒ Section 3: Grant Funding Request ☒ Section 4: Additional Information ☒ Section 5: Supplemental Documents ☒ City resolution ☒ Site pictures ☒ Project plans and/or maps ☒ Community letters of support (optional) ☒ Other: Click or tap here to enter text. Application Affirmation: ☒ This check box serves as acknowledgement that the information contained herein is accurate to the best of your knowledge. You are also acknowledging that the application has been reviewed and approved by the LGU signatory authority who has provided their consent for this application to be submitted. Name of person who checked the box Elizabeth Heyman Professional Title Public Works Director Phone 763-569-3328 Email eheyman@brooklyncentermn.gov Page 126 of 155 HCYAG 11 Page 127 of 155 December 12, 2024 Dear Kory Anderson Wagner: Thank you for submitting a proposal on behalf of City of Brooklyn Center in response to the Hennepin County Youth Activities Grants (HCYAG) request for applications for Play Area grants. The evaluation process has been completed, and we are pleased to inform you that your application was selected by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners for contract negotiations with funding of $100,000 for multiple playgrounds through the city. A Hennepin County representative will contact you soon to discuss next steps, which may include submitting additional documentation, discussion of eligible/ineligible expenses, and confirmation of the grant agreement review process and signatory authority. This process may take several weeks. Eligible expenses may be incurred on or after January 1, 2025, prior to full execution of the grant agreement, with written pre-approval from Hennepin County. Please contact Youth.Grants@hennepin.us with questions. Sincerely, Sarah Breyette, Program Manager Youth Activities Grants Program Hennepin County Grants Management and Administration Contact Us Hennepin County Youth Activities Grants Youth.Grants@hennepin.us Follow us Page 128 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Garett Flesland, Chief of Police THROUGH: Reggie Edwards, City Manager BY: Garett Flesland, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Resolution Acknowledging Awarded funds from the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Foundation and Authorizing Acceptance and Execution of Grant Funds for a 2025 Community Open House Requested Council Action: -Motion to approve the resolution acknowledging awarded funds from the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Foundation and authorizing acceptance and execution of grant funds for a 2025 Community Open House. Background: Staff applied for a grant through the Minnesota Chief's of Police Foundation Community Partnership Grant Program to support a Community Open House at the Brooklyn Center Police Department during 2025. Budget Issues: The total grant award is $2,500. Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. MCPA Grant for Community Open House Resolution 2. MCPF Community Partnership Grant Program Grant Approval Notification Page 129 of 155 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING AWARDED FUNDS FROM THE MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE FOUNDATION AND AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE AND EXECUTION OF GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS, the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Foundation (MCPF) established the Community Partnership Grant Program to support police departments in fostering strong relationships and trust within their communities; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center Police Department applied for and has been awarded grant funding under this program in the amount of $2,500 to support its Spring 2025 Community Open House; and WHEREAS, the awarded funds will be used to purchase promotional items and food for the event, promoting community engagement and transparency; and WHEREAS, the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as outlined in the MCPF Grant Agreement and will submit a Post-Grant Report detailing the grant’s impact; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The City Council formally acknowledges and accepts the $2,500 grant awarded by the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Foundation. 2. The City Manager and Chief of Police Garett Flesland are hereby authorized to execute any necessary agreements, amendments, or other documents to implement the project as outlined in the grant application. 3. The City expresses its gratitude to the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Foundation for its support in promoting community engagement and fostering positive police-community relationships. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Page 130 of 155 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 131 of 155 Page 132 of 155 Page 133 of 155 Page 134 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Garett Flesland, Chief of Police THROUGH: Reggie Edwards, City Manager BY: Garett Flesland, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Resolution Accepting Additional Grant Funding for an Additional Intensive Comprehensive Peace Officer Education & Training (ICPOET) Position Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve the resolution authorizing acceptance and execution of additional awarded funds for a fourth Intensive Comprehensive Peace Officer Education & Training position. Background: On November 25, 2024, the Brooklyn Center City Council previously approved the acceptance of an initial $150,000 in Intensive Comprehensive Peace Officer Education & Training (ICPOET) program grant funding from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety Office of Justice Programs (OJP) for three ICPOET candidate positions. On January 7, 2025, the OJP notified the City of Brooklyn Center that they would be adding an additional $50,000 to the city's 2025 ICPOET grant for one additional candidate position. These funds will be added to the city's current award through an amendment to the original grant agreement. Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. ICPOET Resolution for Additional Funds Page 135 of 155 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ADDITIONAL GRANT FUNDING FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS FOR AN ADDITIONAL INTENSIVE COMPREHENSIVE PEACE OFFICER EDUCATION & TRAINING (ICPOET) POSITION AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT AMENDMENT WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Public Safety Office of Justice Programs initially awarded $150,000 in grant funding to the City of Brooklyn Center Police Department through the Intensive Comprehensive Peace Officer Education & Training (ICPOET) program to support three new ICPOET cadet positions; and WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center City Council previously approved the acceptance of the initial $150,000 in ICPOET grant funding through Resolution No. 2024-111 on November 25, 2024; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Public Safety Office of Justice Programs has now awarded an additional $50,000 in grant funding to support one additional ICPOET cadet position, thereby further enhancing law enforcement capacity within the community; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center acknowledges the importance of this additional funding in further addressing recruitment challenges, creating new opportunities for qualified community members to pursue careers in law enforcement, and fostering a diverse workforce reflective of the community served; and WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Police Department, under the leadership of Chief of Police Garett Flesland, intends to use this additional funding to support personnel wages, academic tuition, and essential training resources for the additional ICPOET cadet position; and WHEREAS, the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the amended grant agreement; and WHEREAS, the additional grant award amount is $50,000, with no matching requirement, will help cover wages, fringe benefits, contracted services, program expenses, and office expenses as detailed an the amended grant budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, after appropriate examination and due consideration, the governing body of the City: 1. Acceptance of Additional Grant Funding: The City Council formally accepts the additional $50,000 in grant funding awarded by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety Office of Justice Programs for one additional ICPOET position. Page 136 of 155 2. Authorization to Execute Amendment: The City Council authorizes City Manager Dr. Reggie Edwards and Chief of Police Garett Flesland to execute any agreements, amendments, or other necessary documents related to the ICPOET grant funding on behalf of the City. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 137 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Barb Suciu, City Clerk THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Barb Suciu, City Clerk SUBJECT: Minneapolis Northwest Tourism Annual Report Requested Council Action: - Motion to accept the presentation Background: This is the annual report from Minneapolis Northwest Tourism. Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. BC City council PPT_1-13-2025 (002) Page 138 of 155 City Council Presentation January 13, 2025 Page 139 of 155 2025 Budget Page 140 of 155 Occupancy Update 44.8 98.35 44.0652.3 98.15 51.3648.2 96.64 46.54 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Occupancy %ADR RevPAR Trend Minneapolis Northwest Nov '24 Nov '23 Nov '22 59.2 108.94 64.5557.4 107.34 61.5652.6 101.52 53.45 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Occupancy %ADR RevPAR Year to Date 2024 2023 2022 Page 141 of 155 Marketing & Promotions Page 142 of 155 Sales & Travel •Sports Express •Sports ETA •Connect Diversity •HelmsBriscoe Annual Business Conference •Connect Associations •Small Market Meetings (September) •Northstar Travel Small Meetings Fall (October) •US Sports Congress (December) Hotel blocks US Cup Soccer – July Week-long event -1,568 room nights at The Embassy Suites, Fairfield Inn and Marriott NW Visitor swag bags / Hotel welcome signs with QR codes linked to area restaurants. Page 143 of 155 Gus Macker Update Page 144 of 155 Gus Macker Update Twin Cities Gus Macker Goals 1. A wholesome, family-oriented event 2. A tournament designed for players 3. A value to sponsors 4. A fundraising event for the community 5. A major media sporting event 6. Entertaining for the spectators 7. Community unifier 8. Female player percentage record 9. Heighten perception of the Brooklyns 10. Create hotel room overnight stays In the end we had a goal of 150 teams – we had 160 teams We had a goal of $20,000 for the six nonprofit beneficiaries – we raised $37,500 We set a record of having nearly 30% girls/women as registered players setting a modern day record! Page 145 of 155 Gus Macker Update •74.9% of visitors observed in the destination during the dates of 8/15-8/19 were from out-of- state •Chicago, IL, Fargo, ND and Superior, WI were the top 3 out-of-state origin markets •60% of cardholders observed during these dates were between the ages of 25-54, 52% of them have children in the household and 32% have a household income of over $100k •20% of spending that occured at restaurants during this time came from visitors (meaning $20 out of every $100 that restaurants brought in, is from visitors) •69% of spending that occurred in retail during this time came from visitors (meaning $69 out of every $100 that retail stores brought in was from visitors) •55% of visitor spending that occured at attractions, came from visitors ($55 out of every $100 that attractions brought in, is from visitors) Page 146 of 155 2025 Preliminary Strategy 1.Conduct Listening Sessions with residents and businesses 2.Update website and other photography to enhance traffic 3.Create updated newsletter and focus on increased distribution 4.Conduct a Familiarization Tour for meeting planners and media 5.Participate in tradeshows and events to promote tourism and leads 6.Host the Gus Macker tournament with board approved revisions 7.Continue to update hotel partners on information received and best practices in industry 8.Continue the blog and feature partners to highlight activities in the Brooklyns 9.Determine if rebranding is necessary Page 147 of 155 Questions & Thank You Leslie Wright President & CEO Leslie@mplsnw.com Page 148 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Lydia Ener, Assistant City Engineer THROUGH: Elizabeth Heyman, Director of Public Works BY: Lydia Ener, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Improvement Project No. 2025-02, 67th Avenue and James Avenue Mill & Overlay to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls Requested Council Action: Motion to approve a resolution certifying special assessments for Improvement Project No. 2025-02, 67th Avenue and James Avenue Mill & Overlay to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls. Background: A public hearing is scheduled on January 13, 2025, to consider certification of proposed special assessments for street improvements for Improvement Project No. 2025-02. All potentially affected property owners have been notified by mail of the date of the assessment public hearing and the amount of proposed special assessments. An open house was held for adjacent properties and property owners on August 29, 2024. Due to commercial and industrial property uses, the meeting was held midday over the typical lunch hours rather than in the evening, to promote the attendance of the commercial properties. Six properties provided responses, with five attending in person, representing five properties of the eleven adjacent to the project. Each attendee was able to discuss how the project would impact their business and access, as well as voice any concerns that could be addressed with the project. Most questions asked related to truck parking, access for shipments during construction, and the assessment process. All attendees seemed satisfied with having their questions answered, and many expressed intertest in personal follow-up when construction begins. I. Explanation of Improvements The proposed project includes roadway and minor utility improvements on 67th Avenue N and James Avenue N. On September 23, 2024, the City Council received the project feasibility report and called for a public hearing to be held on October 28, 2024, to consider these improvements. The project feasibility report provides a description of recommended improvements for the proposed area and an estimated project budget. The proposed improvements are as follows: 1. Street Improvements – Milling and overlaying of existing bituminous pavement, miscellaneous repairs of concrete curb and gutter and driveway Page 149 of 155 aprons, and boulevard restoration. 2. Storm Drainage Improvements - The recommended storm sewer improvements consists of replacing catch basin and manhole castings. 3. Water Main Improvements - The recommended water main improvements include replacing approximately half of the existing valves and hydrants. 4. Sanitary Sewer Improvements - The recommended sanitary sewer improvements consists of replacing manhole castings. II. Summary of Assessments Special assessments are proposed as one of several funding sources for the improvements located within the project area. On November 25, 2024, the City Council adopted the 2025 special assessment rates for street and storm drainage improvements. The 2025 rates were established in accordance with the City’s Special Assessment Policy. The feasibility report includes a preliminary assessment roll identifying the affected properties, as well as the zoning designations and associated preliminary assessment. See attached Pending Assessment Roll and Assessment Map from the project feasibility report. The special assessments will not exceed the amounts on the attached special assessment roll. The commercial and industrial properties within the project area are proposed to be assessed on an area basis. An “A” zone benefit includes the area abutting the street to be improved, extended to the depth of 200-feet and a “B” zone of lesser benefit for the remainder of the property area. The “A” zone rate is based on assessing 70 percent of the total street project cost deemed to benefit the property and the “B” zone rate is based on 30 percent. Based on cost estimates for the street improvements, the unit rate has been determined to be “A” zone rate of $0.3453 per square foot and a “B” zone rate of $0.1480 per square foot. It should be noted that historically the assessments have been levied based on estimated costs rather than actual costs, understanding that the project costs are levied at a reduced percentage (70 and 30 percent as indicated above). The remaining street construction costs would be funded from the Street Reconstruction Fund. A summary of the proposed special assessments for street improvements is provided in Appendix A. Appeals Process If an appeal for a specific property is filed with district court, the City Attorney will advise the City Council of options for handling the dispute and potential litigation issues. Currently, staff is not aware of any substantive objection and recommends approval accordingly. Payment Options Available to Property Owners Once an assessment roll is adopted by the City Council, the owner of each property has the following payment options: Page 150 of 155 1. Pay the entire amount of the special assessment, without interest, between April 15 and September 30, 2025. 2. From October 1, 2025, to the end of the business day on November 14, 2025, a property owner may pay the total assessment, with interest calculated from October 1, 2025, to the date of payment. 3. A property owner may pay the assessment over a 10-year period. The first payment will be due with taxes in 2026. The total principal will be payable in annual installments. Interest at 7.0 percent is paid on the unpaid balance. 4. The City will accept partial prepayments of special assessments. III. Recommended Council Procedure Public Hearing for Special Assessments: Staff recommends that a presentation be provided to the City Council prior to holding the assessment public hearing. Following the presentation, a public hearing to consider certification of proposed special assessments for street improvements should be conducted to receive public comments. The attached resolution certifying special assessments for street improvements for Improvement Project No. 2025-02 to the Hennepin County tax rolls is provided for City Council consideration upon closing of the public hearing. Budget Issues: The estimated cost for street improvements is $560,000. The total amount proposed to be assessed for street improvements is $379,980.46. The total project cost for the 67th Avenue and James Avenue Mill & Overlay project is estimated to be $790,000. Funding sources for the project are proposed from a variety of sources as described in the feasibility report. The Draft Special Assessment Levy Roll for Improvement Project No. 2025-02 is included in Appendix A of the feasibility report. The project funding sources, as described in the September 23, 2024 Feasibility Report, are currently estimated to be: Special Assessments $ 379,980.46 Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund $ 30,000.00 Water Utility Fund $ 90,000.00 Storm Drainage Utility Fund $ 110,000.00 Street Reconstruction Fund $ 180,019.54 Total $ 790,000.00 Inclusive Community Engagement: Staff conducted a public informational meeting with property owners on August 29, 2024. An Improvement Public Hearing was held on October 28, 2024 to receive public comments pertaining to the proposed improvements. Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: NA Strategic Priorities and Values: Page 151 of 155 ATTACHMENTS: 1. 1_67th & James Certifying Assessments Res Page 152 of 155 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO._____________ RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2025-02, 67TH AVENUE AND JAMES AVENUE MILL & OVERLAY TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met, heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed Special Assessment Levy No. 26001; and WHEREAS, assessment rolls, copies of which are attached hereto and part hereof by reference, have been prepared by the City Engineer and City Clerk, tabulating those properties where street improvement costs are to be assessed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. Such proposed assessments, Special Assessment Levy No. 26001 for street improvements, made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute special assessments against lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessments levied against it. 2. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years as indicated on the assessment roll. The first of the installments shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 2026, and shall bear interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 7.0 percent per annum from October 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of assessment to the County Auditor pay the whole assessment, to the City Treasurer, without interest, if entire assessment is paid on or before September 30, 2025. After September 30, 2025, they may pay the total assessment, plus interest. Interest will accumulate from October 1, 2025, through the date of payment. Such payment must be made by the close-of-business November 14, 2025, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If the owner wishes to pay off the balance at some point in the future, such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this Page 153 of 155 RESOLUTION NO. _______________ assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 154 of 155 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Barb Suciu, City Clerk THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Barb Suciu, City Clerk SUBJECT: Consideration of Appointments to City Commissions Requested Council Action: - appoint individuals to respective commissions Background: The following individuals have applied to serve on commissions. If the council is in agreement, they could be appointed to the respective commission. Cultural and Public Arts Marie Martin Michelle Thayer Park & Recreation Commission Jill Dalton Jack MacMillan Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: None Page 155 of 155