HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-130 CCRMember Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -130
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDMENT OF COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 82 -255
(COMPREHENSIVE PLAN) RELATIVE TO LAND ALONG BROOKLYN BOULEVARD
RECOMMENDED FOR OFFICE OR MID- DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the Council on December 20, 1982 adopted Resolution No. 82 -255,
adopting the updated Brooklyn Center Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at its August 4, 1983 meeting held a
duly called public hearing and coinsiCv red an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
to allow office uses and mid- density residential uses along Brooklyn Boulevard on
an interchangeable basis and recommended such an amendment favorably under Plan-
ning Commission Resolution No. 83 -3; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered such an amendment to the Plan at
its August 22, 1983 regular meeting; and
WHEREAS, the Plan (at page 98) recommends service /office development or
townhouse development at various locations along Brooklyn Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the Plan (at various pages in the Brooklyn Boulevard study)
recommends that areas of commercial and residential development be clearly
separated; and
WHEREAS, the Plan (at figures 26 and 27) treats office uses and medium
density residential uses as interchangeable in their relationship to the Boulevard
and to adjacent residential uses; and
WHEREAS, both office and medium density residential (townhouse) develop-
ment require 15' wide buffer strips and 4' high opaque fencing adjacent to single
family residential; and
WHEREAS, a policy of allowing offices and townhouses on an interchange-
able basis would not likely increase traffic or the demand on public utilities
beyond what is comprehended presently under the Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Brooklyn Center City Council
pursuant to Section 35 -202 of the City Ordinances, that Council Resolution No.
82 -255 (Comprehensive Plan) be amended to allow offices and townhouses on an
interchangeable basis along the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor and that the following
specific amendments be made in the text of the Plan:
At page 167:
"The residential area immediately south of I -94 and that area
north of 70th Avenue should receive infill development and
redevelopment with medium density. [Commercial] Retail and
service uses other than those already in existence should not
be allowed to stray into these residential enclaves and detract
from the character which is being sought."
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -130
At page 163:
RECOMMENDED CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVE
Land Uses
The recommended Conceptual Alternative for the continued evolution
of the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor recognizes the constraints
which certain existing developments have placed upon the City's
options for change within the corridor. Working within these
parameters, the Recommended Conceptual Alternative attempts
to strike a reasonable balance between the status quo shown in
conceptual Alternative A and the close -to -ideal situation
portrayed by Conceptual Alternative C. This option was designed
with the following objectives in mind:
to contain [commercial] retail and service land uses
within clearly defined sectors of the Brooklyn
Boulevard corridor; propose means of preventing the
evolution of a "strip" of retail and service businesses
from State Highway (TH) 100 to the northern City Boundary
1
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -1
At page'93:
TABLE 14
Land Use Plan Revisions
Location
Number Recommended -Land Use
Ia. Mid Density Residential or Public Land
1b. Mid- Density Residential
2. Single- Family Residential
3. Commercial Retail
4. Commercial Retail
5. Mid Density Residential
6a. Light Industrial
6b.. Light Industrial
6c. Mid Density Residential
7a. Single Family Residential
7b. Public Open Space
8. Multiple Family Residential
9. Commercial Retail
10. Commercial /Retail
110 Service /Office
12. Mid- Density Residential
13. Mid- Density Residential
14. Single- or Two Family Residential
15. Public Open Space
16. Public Open Space
17. Mid- Density Residential /Office
18. Light Industtrail
19. Commercial
20. Low Density Residential
21. Service /Office /iiid- Density Residential
22. Low- Density Residential
23. Service /Office /+l
id- Density P.esidential
24. Service /Office
25. Service /Office Plid- Density Residential
26. Service /Of*f ice /i i d- Density .^,esi denti ai
27. Service /Office /71id-Density Residential
28. Service /Off ice ii d- Density Residential
-29. Commercial Retail
30. Mid Density Residential /Office
31. Service /Office
32. Mid- Density Residential /Office
33.. Mid- Density Residential /Office
34. Mid Density Residential
35. Commercial Retail
36. Mid Density Residential /Office
37. Mid Density Residential
38. Single Family Residential
39. Service /Office
40. Commercial Retail
41. Service /Office /i;id- Density Residential
42. Mid- Density Residential
I
II U
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -130
Auaus 2
ATTEST:
1
Mayor /J
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Rich Theis and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof; Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis;
and the following voted against the same; none,
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.