Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2025.05.05 CCP REGULAR
CITY COUNCIL MEETING City Hall Council Chambers May 5, 2025 AGENDA 1. Call to Order - 7:00 p.m. Attendees please turn off cell phones and pages during the meeting. A copy of the full meeting packet is available in the binder at the entrance to the Council Chambers. 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Informal Open Forum This is an opportunity for the public to address the City Council on items that are not on the agenda. It is limited to 15 minutes. It may not be used to make personal attacks, air personal grievances, make political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with the presenter. Questions from the Council will be for clarification purposes only. It will not be used as a time for problem- solving or reacting to the comments made but for hearing the presenter for informational purposes only. The first call will be for those that have notified the Clerk that they would like to speak during the open forum and then ask if anyone connected to this meeting would like to speak. When called upon, please indicate your name and then proceed. Please be sure to state your name before speaking. a. Meeting Decorum 5. Invocation - Lawrence-Anderson 6. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda These items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There isn't a separate discussion for these items unless a Councilmember so requests, then it is moved to the end of the Council Consideration Items. a. Approval of Minutes b. Approval of Licenses c. Resolution Authorizing Execution of a Professional Services Agreement, Project No. 2026-05, Humboldt Area Pedestrian Improvement 7. Presentations/Proclamations/Recognitions/Donations a. Resolution Declaring April 25, 2025, to be Arbor Day and May 2025 to be Arbor Month in Brooklyn Center b. Resolution Recognizing Brooklyn Center as a Tree City USA for the Thirty- Third Consecutive Year c. Office of Community Prevention, Health and Safety Annual Council Report 8. Public Hearings Page 1 of 221 a. Resolution Authorizing the Continuation of Municipal Liquor Operations in the City of Brooklyn Center 9. Planning Commission Items a. Resolution Regarding the Recommended Approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2025-002 for a Major Site and Building Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit for Conversion of an Approximately 14,000-Square Foot Former Credit Union to a New Horizon Academy Early Learning Center (7100 Brooklyn Boulevard) 10. Council Consideration Items 11. Council Report 12. Adjournment Page 2 of 221 COUNCIL MEETING DECORUM To ensure meetings are conducted in a professional and courteous manner which enables the orderly conduct of business, all persons in attendance or who participate in such meetings shall conduct themselves in a manner that does not interfere with the ability of others to observe and, when allowed, to participate without disruption or fear of intimidation. A. Decorum. Persons who attend meetings must avoid conduct that disrupts, interferes with, or disturbs the orderly conduct of the meeting or the ability of other attendees to observe and participate as appropriate. To that end, persons who attend meetings are subject to the following: (1) Members of the public may only speak during meetings when allowed under Council Rules and only after being recognized by the presiding officer. The presiding officer may establish time limits for the acceptance of public comments or testimony. (2) Public comments or testimony must be addressed to the presiding officer and not to other Council Members, staff, or others in attendance. (3) All elected officials shall be referred to by their proper title and surname. (4) Public comments should avoid personal accusations, profanity, or other improper content for a public meeting. (5) Intimidating behaviors, threats of hostility, or actual violence are disallowed. (6) Audible demonstrations intended to disrupt the meeting should be avoided, including stomping of feet, snapping of fingers, clapping of hands, and other conduct that may be intimidating or threatening to others. (7) Holding, displaying, or placing banners, signs, objects, or other materials in any way that endangers others, prevents the free flow of individuals within the chamber, or obstructs or prevents the viewing of the meeting by others is not allowed. B. The presiding officer shall request any person(s) who disrupt, interfere with or disturb the orderly conduct of a meeting to cease the conduct and, as necessary, shall issue an oral warning to the individual(s) found to be in violation. If the individual(s) persists in disrupting, interfering with, or disturbing the meeting, the presiding officer may have the individual(s) removed or, under appropriate circumstances, temporarily clear the gallery. If for any reason the presiding officer fails to take such action, a majority vote may be substituted for action by the presiding officer to maintain order and decorum over the proceedings. C. The Council Chambers capacity is 76 persons per fire code. Page 3 of 221 4/14/25 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION APRIL 14, 2025 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor April Graves at 7:01 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Mayor April Graves and Councilmembers Kris Lawrence-Anderson, Dan Jerzak, Teneshia Kragness, and Laurie Ann Moore. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards, Director of Public Works Elizabeth Heyman, Assistant City Engineer Lydia Ener, Planning and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh, Economic Development Manager Ian Anderson, City Clerk Barb Suciu, and City Attorney Siobhan Tolar. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 4. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM Mayor Graves explained that the conversation about the Community Safety and Violence Prevention Commission from the Work Session will be postponed to a future Work Session. 4a. MEETING DECORUM Mayor April Graves opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum and reviewed the Rules of Decorum. Lori B. pointed out that the most effective oversight opportunity is community-led. The Community Safety and Violence Prevention Commission would review complaints and create an open dialogue. The Duante and Kobe No More Names Initiative fully supports the Community Safety and Violence Prevention Commission. If the Council repeals the Community Safety and Violence Prevention Commission, the Duante and Kobe No More Names Initiative will step up to hold the Police Department accountable. They have the capacity, experience, and knowledge to address law enforcement violence and provide an unbiased report on complaints. Lori B. explained there was a call for a civilian oversight group in Brooklyn Center after Kobe Dimock-Heisler was killed by the Brooklyn Center Police Department. Again, in April 2021, the Page 4 of 221 4/14/25 -2- DRAFT ACLU was going to recommend an oversight group just days after the police killing of Daunte Wright. Jerry S., Jeremy M., and a group of young people requested a basketball court be built in Brooklyn Center. There needs to be an option for youth other than drugs and being on the streets. Councilmember Kragness thanked the young people for attending the meeting. It shows the importance of a Community Center renovation. Katie W., mother of Duante Wright and co-founder of the Duante and Kobe No More Names Initiative, noted that Officer Mike Johnson was rehired by the Brooklyn Center Police Department. Officer Johnson was involved in the traffic stop that killed her son in 2021. He was in charge of Kim Potter and previously trained officers on the use of force. Katie W. noted that Kim Potter used inappropriate force during the 2021 traffic stop by pulling a gun instead of a taser. Officer Johnson testified at Kim Potter’s trial and stated he would have done the same thing in her position. He told the world that it is acceptable not to follow policy, even if it results in the death of an innocent person. Katie W. pointed out that Officer Johnson left the Brooklyn Center Police Department shortly after her son was killed. His rehiring shows the City wants to stick to the status quo. She asked who rehired an officer who didn’t follow policy. She asked if Dr. Edwards, Mayor Graves, or Ms. Turk were involved in the rehiring. The Brooklyn Center community wasn’t involved. Katie W. requested that the Council implement the Community Safety and Violence Prevention Commission. There are plenty of community members who are ready to step up and make a difference in the community, whether or not the Council supports it. Katie W. added Duante Wright’s four-year angel-versary was on April 11, 2025. Amity D., mother of Kobe Dimock-Heisler and co-founder of the Duante and Kobe No More Names Initiative, noted her agreement with Katie W. and Lori B. It is frustrating that the Community Safety and Violence Prevention Commission continues to be postponed. Michelle G., a representative of Communities United Against Police Brutality, implored the Council to implement the Community Safety and Violence Prevention Commission. The public safety response requires many components beyond law enforcement, such as expanded response and commission. A commission keeps the public safety response efforts in line with the community’s changing needs. The commission should include community members, Staff, and experts. Michelle G. added that she brought copies of research materials about the economic benefits of expanded response. She provided them to Staff to be passed along to the Council. Page 5 of 221 4/14/25 -3- DRAFT Julie B. pointed out there is a lack of transparency about decisions the Council has made and individual Councilmembers’ lack of participation and support of fact-finding efforts. White- bodied people need to acknowledge that others have a different lived experience. The Council’s decisions impact every resident of Brooklyn Center. Julie B. noted the Council is charged with protecting the people of Brooklyn Center, solving problems facing the City, making changes as needed to align with trends, and collaborating with Staff to make financial decisions. A Councilmember cannot uphold their role if they refuse to meet with Dr. Edwards. Julie B. stated that a legal conflict of interest doesn’t mean there is an ethical conflict of interest. Community members should be allowed to serve on commissions, but it is a conflict for Councilmembers to serve on commissions. Julie B. added that there was an egregious microaggression during the previous City Council meeting. The City’s black Mayor was accused of potential violence related to throwing a gavel. The Mayor deserves an apology. There was applause from the audience. Julie B. explained she is a low-income, disabled, single mother who has owned her home for 15 years. She doesn’t agree with the decisions that are being made in the name of some of her identities. Councilmembers shouldn’t want to be on the wrong side of history. The record should be clear that community members are willing to stand up to the Council. Andrew K. pointed out that Que Viet makes extremely delicious pho. He detailed the ingredients and how the dish is assembled. There are rules about public comment that may violate the First Amendment. He explained it might sound like he swears, but he is only talking about soup. Councilmember Moore moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded to close the Informal Open Forum at 7:21 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 5. INVOCATION Councilmember Jerzak read a quote by Runde and Flanagan from a book on leadership, “The better able team members are to engage, speak, listen, hear, interpret, and respond constructively, the more likely their teams are to leverage conflict rather than be leveled by it.” 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Graves reiterated that the conversation about the Community Safety and Violence Prevention Commission from the Work Session will be postponed to a future Work Session. Page 6 of 221 4/14/25 -4- DRAFT Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda, as amended, and the following consent items were approved: 6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. March 24, 2025 – Study Session 2. March 24, 2025 – Regular Session 6b. LICENSES AMUSEMENT CENTER DEVICES BC Community Center 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy HOSPITALITY ACCOMMODATIONS Travelodge 6415 James Circle N MECHANICAL A&E Heating & Air Conditioning 1841 161st Lane NE Ham Lake 55304 Woodbury HVAC Service@q.com 14720 5th Street S. Afton 55001 MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSES Luther Honda 6800 Brooklyn Boulevard Luther Mazda Mitsubishi 4435 68th Avenue N Brookdale Toyota 6700 Brooklyn Boulevard Luther Volkswagen 6801 Brooklyn Boulevard Luther Chevrolet 6701 Brooklyn Boulevard Luther Buick GMC 4301 68th Avenue N RENTAL INITIAL (TYPE II – two-year license) 4201 Lakeside Avenue N, #108 Kerwin Ness & Sheryl Ness 819 Woodbine Lane CAG MINNESOTA FUND II LLC 6015 Dupont Avenue N CAG MINNESOTA FUND II LLC 6125 Emerson Avenue N MAI HER & TOU LEE Page 7 of 221 4/14/25 -5- DRAFT 6300 Kyle Avenue N Kyle Substad RENEWAL (TYPE IV – six-month license) 5336 Russell Avenue N CHRISTOPHER M BARNARD 5301 France Avenue N Juniper Land Trust Llc 5410 France Avenue N SFR BORROWER 2022-1 LLC 5556 Emerson Avenue N Thomas D Belting 6206 Brooklyn Boulevard Paul Yang 6712 Beard Avenue N Mlmjr Properties & Invst Llc 6725 Bryant Avenue N Vong Duong 7131 Ewing Avenue N The Next Edison Trust 7243 Riverdale Road Ih2 Property Illinois Lp RENEWAL (TYPE III – one-year license) 6700 Humboldt Avenue N Mimg Clxxxiv Sterling Sq Sub 5350 Logan Avenue N Ccf3 Llc 6342 June Avenue N D A Swartout Jr/t L Swartout RENEWAL (TYPE II – two-year license) 6710 Orchard Lane Marvin Gardens Townhomes Lp 807 Woodbine Lane J P Green & E E Green 4112 Woodbine Lane Shoua Vang & Nancy Xiong 5300 Colfax Avenue N Thao Pha 6907 Palmer Lake Drive W JULIA A CELLERI MERCHAN & MIGUELRIERA RENEWAL (TYPE I – three-year license) 7240 West River Road Nedzad Ceric 4201 Lakeside Avenue N, #117 Jacqueline M Lanerd Et Al Tr Page 8 of 221 4/14/25 -6- DRAFT 818 Woodbine Lane QZ Funding LLC 3224 62nd Avenue N Laura A Mills 3821 Oak Street Biota Holdings, LLC 4007 Joyce Lane John Jorgensen 5043 Brooklyn Blvd Thr Property Illinois L P 5801 Irving Avenue N Ih3 Property Minnesota Lp 6430 Major Avenue N CHRISTAL PACHEE HER 6633 Xerxes Place N BEREKET S GEBREMARIAM SIGNHANGER Signcrafter’s Outdoor 14050 Lincoln Street NE Ham Lake 55304 6c. RESOLUTION NO. 2025-038 ACCEPTING THE FY2024 EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT (JAG) AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT 6d. RESOLUTION NO. 2025-039 IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR LCA PREDEVELOPMENT FUNDING AND AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR MORTY'S BARK AND BREW Motion passed unanimously. 7. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS 7a. PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING AND HONORING PAN AMERICAN DAY ON APRIL 14, 2025 Mayor Graves read in full a Proclamation recognizing and honoring Pan American Day on April 14, 2025. Councilmember Kragness moved, and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to accept the proclamation. Motion passed unanimously. 7b. RESOLUTION NO 2025-040 DECLARING APRIL 22, 2025, AS EARTH DAY IN BROOKLYN CENTER Page 9 of 221 4/14/25 -7- DRAFT Mayor Graves read in full a Resolution declaring April 22, 2025, as Earth Day in Brooklyn Center. Councilmember Kragness moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to adopt a resolution declaring April 22, 2025, as Earth Day in Brooklyn Center. Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Graves pointed out there is a Shingle Creek clean-up on April 22, 2025. Public Works Director Elizabeth Heyman explained the Shingle Creek clean-up was rebranded and moved to May 17, 2025. They are collaborating with a swap event in hopes of a better turnout and better weather. Councilmember Moore noted the Brooklyn Center Lady Lions does another clean-up event. She asked if Staff had a list of planned park clean-ups. Ms. Heyman stated she would compile a list and provide it in the weekly update. 7c. ECONOMIC GROWTH PLAN INTRODUCTION/UPDATE City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited Economic Development Manager Ian Alexander to continue the Staff presentation. Economic Development Manager Ian Alexander pointed out that the City’s consultant, Breanne Rothstein of Thrive Consulting, used to work for Brooklyn Park as their Community Development Director. Breanne Rothstein, Thrive Consulting, explained that the Economic Growth Plan was created to assess Brooklyn Center’s economic strengths and opportunities, identify key market niches and target industries, and develop strategies to support business growth, workforce development, and community prosperity. The data collection and research have been completed. Compiling community engagement and stakeholder input has been an ongoing effort. The next step is to draft a strategy and offer recommendations. Ms. Rothstein showed a pie chart with employment by industry in Brooklyn Center. 26 percent of employment in Brooklyn Center is for health care and social assistance, while 18 percent is manufacturing. Those rates are much higher than the seven-county Metro area. Ms. Rothstein explained that the plan will have recommendations to lean into their strengths or to grow smaller industries such as professional and technical services. Two percent of Brooklyn Center’s employment is professional technical services in comparison to the Metro’s seven percent for the sector. Ms. Rothstein showed a list of top manufacturers in the community, including National Purity, Showdown Displays, Casmo, TT Electronics, Sandvik, and Boise Cascade. Page 10 of 221 4/14/25 -8- DRAFT Ms. Rothstein showed a table with data reflecting the largest employers in the City. 2013 and 2022 are used for comparison. Medtronic, Luther Auto Group, and the City have the highest employment numbers. It is good news that there isn’t one extremely large employer that controls the success of the job market. Ms. Rothstein pointed out that their research looked into economic prosperity for both the City and its residents. She explained that the bottom and second quintiles of wealth come from real estate and other assets. Real estate, especially primary ownership of homes, is a critical wealth builder. Ms. Rothstein stated that Brooklyn Center is younger on average than the Twin Cities and Brooklyn Park. 29 percent of Brooklyn Center residents are under 18, and 31 percent are aged 25 to 44. The City should alter marketing strategies to focus on the younger demographics and promote employment opportunities for younger groups. She added that the elderly population in Brooklyn Center is a smaller proportion of its total population than the rest of the Metro. Ms. Rothstein noted that Brooklyn Center’s unemployment rate is comparable to the Twin Cities Metro, Minneapolis, and Brooklyn Park. Brooklyn Center’s rate is slightly higher than the Metro area. Too low of an unemployment rate makes it more difficult to fill jobs. She showed two different graphs with more data. Ms. Rothstein showed a chart depicting the annual average wages for Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, and the Twin Cities. On the whole, Brooklyn Center’s annual wages are lower than both the County’s and the Twin Cities’ annual wages. Ms. Rothstein reiterated that homeownership is an important way to build wealth. She showed a graph of homeownership rates for Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, and the Twin Cities. Brooklyn Center has a healthy homeownership rate, which is on par with the County. The Twin Cities region has a slightly higher homeownership rate. Ms. Rothstein showed a graph with the median housing values over the years. Brooklyn Center’s median housing value is lower than the County and the Metro area. The age of the housing stock and macro-level factors contribute to the lower value. Ms. Rothstein showed a map depicting resident access to jobs in the City. 13,000 people come into the City to work while over 15,000 people leave the City for work. Only 992 people live and work in Brooklyn Center, which is around seven percent. The average city has 13 percent of its population working in the city. She pointed out that creating local jobs doesn’t guarantee that residents will receive the jobs. The City needs to develop relationships with businesses to promote local hiring. Ms. Rothstein summarized the findings of her research. Brooklyn Center’s employment, while diverse in the industry, is more weighted towards healthcare, social assistance, and manufacturing than the Metro, which tends to pay less than professional services. Page 11 of 221 4/14/25 -9- DRAFT Ms. Rothstein noted that Brooklyn Center has various market assets such as the strategic location along I-94 and the proximity to downtown Minneapolis, vacant land owned by the City, a diverse population, growing entrepreneurial local businesses, and access to opportunities and housing for young people. Ms. Rothstein added that preliminary economic growth and prosperity goals would be to increase resident wages, increase housing values, grow connection to the workforce, promote homeownership, invest in the growing tax base, invest in healthcare and manufacturing land uses, and the workforce. Mayor Graves pointed out that the City used to have a down payment assistance program. However, there was a great need for home improvement funds, so the money was transferred. She stated she would like ideas on how to promote homeownership for residents while improving the housing stock. Mayor Graves noted it makes sense to lean into the community’s strengths in healthcare and manufacturing. However, professional services have higher wages. The two recommendations to increase resident wages and invest in healthcare and manufacturing land uses, and the workforce are at odds with one another. Mayor Graves stated there are two organizations newer to the City that focus on workforce development. Staff also works on workforce development, and Brooklyn Center can better tap into resources to promote workforce development. Mayor Graves added she was attracted to Brooklyn Center because there was a younger population and affordable homes. Councilmember Kragness noted the average income for residents is listed as $56,000. However, a majority of folks working in Brooklyn Center live elsewhere. She asked what the average salary is in Brooklyn Center. Ms. Rothstein offered to gather the data on household income or per capita income and provide it to Councilmember Kragness. Councilmember Kragness pointed out Target and Walmart left Brooklyn Center in recent years. She asked if the employees had found jobs in Brooklyn Center or in other cities. Ms. Rothstein stated that the data can’t specifically show where the employees went. However, she can find more updated employment numbers within the City. Councilmember Jerzak stated that the Council has very little influence on how much private businesses pay their employees. Also, the income required to afford a home is more than the City residents’ median income. It is problematic if the City tries to increase wages for folks who mostly don’t live in Brooklyn Center. Councilmember Jerzak added that some of the data is old. For example, Caribou Coffee moved to Maple Grove. He requested that calculations be completed on net gain and loss for employees. Page 12 of 221 4/14/25 -10- DRAFT Mayor Graves explained she was able to buy her home because it was after the market crash. She asked if there were opportunities to create a similar situation for current residents. For example, they could connect potential homeowners to blighted properties at a much lower cost. Ms. Rothstein agreed it was a good idea. Also, it would be helpful for sellers to target current renters if they are looking to sell their homes. Mayor Graves moved, and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to accept the Economic Growth Plan Introduction/Update. Motion passed unanimously. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8a. ORDINANCE NO. 2025-04; AMENDING CHAPTER 23-2700 OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TO ESTABLISH CANNABIS AND HEMP BUSINESSES REGULATIONS - SECOND READING City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited City Clerk Barb Suciu to continue the Staff presentation. He noted Ms. Suciu was participating in the meeting remotely. Ms. Suciu explained that Minnesota established the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) to create statutes and licensing processes. The OCM released the Guide for Local Governments on Adult-Use Cannabis in August 2024; however, the Guide was subsequently revised in November 2024 and again in early January 2025. Currently, licenses are expected to be announced in May or June of 2025. Ms. Suciu stated that the OCM regulates the cannabis industry Statewide and provides guidance on the standards for the State. The OCM notifies cities of a license application to check for zoning compliance, governs the application and licensing process for cannabis and hemp businesses, including the specific requirements for each type of license and their respective business activities, and conducts enforcement and inspection activities across the Minnesota cannabis and hemp industries. It also requires all cannabis and Lower Potency Hemp Edible (LPHE) businesses to obtain a license once the State of Minnesota has established the licensing process. Ms. Suciu stated the OCM was in a public comment period for the Rulemaking Draft until February 12, 2025. The Social Equity Verification deadline was January 30, 2025. All applicant windows open on February 18, 2025. Licenses will be approved in May or June of 2025. There are multiple Chapters of the City Code that will be impacted. Ms. Suciu explained that there are licensing parameters to be considered. A pre-license certification is standard procedure for the OCM to ensure the licensee has complied with local zoning laws and regulations prior to the State issuing a cannabis or hemp business license. Ms. Suciu noted another license is Local Government as a Cannabis Retailer. The City cannot hold a Cannabis Retailer registration and a lower-potency hemp product (LPHP) registration. Page 13 of 221 4/14/25 -11- DRAFT Currently, the two municipal liquor stores and Centerbrook Golf Course hold LPHP registrations. Section 23-2705 states retail registration is required. Ms. Suciu stated Cannabis Retailer Registration Limits 23-2706, subd. B stated local governments may limit the number of retailers and microbusinesses or mezzobusinesses with retail endorsements, but in no case can there be less than one retail location per 12,500 residents. The City of Brooklyn Center has 33,982 residents per the 2023 Minnesota State Demographer Estimates. Therefore, the City would be expected to provide for a minimum of three licenses. She noted retail registrations for LPHE retailers are not required but may not be limited in number by the government. Ms. Suciu stated 23-2712 Issuance of Registration or Renewal states registrations will be issued if the applicants meet the requirements of the ordinance. 23-2712 Cannabis Retailer Operating Regulations address hours of operation and samples. The hours are set to match liquor store hours. The samples are prohibited per Proposed Rules Section 9810. Ms. Suciu explained that 23-2716 prohibits smoking indoors and 23-2717 lists sanctions for violations. A retail sale without retail registration would result in a $2,000 fee. Other violations have a fee schedule; the first violation is $1,000, the second is $1,250, the third is $1,500, and the fourth is $2,000. Ms. Suciu pointed out that 23-2718 states that the penalty for an individual would be a misdemeanor-level offense. IT is similar to selling tobacco to a minor. Enforcement 23-2719 requires age certification compliance checks to be completed at least once per calendar year. Ms. Suciu added that other cities are not limiting the number of cannabis retail businesses. Mayor Graves noted the Council previously discussed buffers. She asked if Staff could estimate how many retailers could be allowed with the buffers in place. Ms. Suciu stated that the buffer approved was 300 feet from schools. The Community Development Department has fielded many calls with concerns. Mayor Graves asked if 21 cannabis retailers could be in the City with the buffers in place. City Attorney Siobhan Tolar stated the question is an issue of zoning. Anywhere without a blue circle on the map could have a retail business. Residential neighborhoods and other zones would not allow a retail use. Councilmember Kragness requested that a map be generated of potential cannabis retailer sites. Each gap between the blue circles would only allow one cannabis retailer. Ms. Tolar pointed out there isn’t a buffer to space out cannabis retailers per Council direction. Zoning and Planning Administrator Ginny McIntosh reiterated that the Community Development Department has fielded many calls with concerns. The buffer measurements for schools begin at the front door. For some schools, the 300-foot buffer doesn’t go beyond a school’s property. Therefore, a cannabis retailer could be added next door to schools. Page 14 of 221 4/14/25 -12- DRAFT Mayor Graves asked if the residential and commercial areas on Brooklyn Boulevard should change. Ms. McIntosh explained that some of the mixed-use zoning allows for commercial uses. A cannabis business could be established in commercial areas. There are no spacing requirements between cannabis businesses, so any number of the 13 cannabis licenses could co-locate in one area. The buffers have a minimal impact on restrictions. Councilmember Kragness stated she understood the buffer was measured from the edge of a school’s property. The measurements should be revisited. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked if the measurement could be done from the edge of the property rather than the front door. Ms. Tolar noted Staff completes zoning measurements from the front doors. It is not recommended for there to be multiple measurement standards. It is unlikely a 500-foot buffer would do much more than the 300-foot buffer. Ms. McIntosh noted the Council intended to align with the alcohol buffers. Park attractions are measured from the primary attraction. She asked if the measurement could be from a property’s edge rather than a front door. Ms. Tolar stated the Zoning Ordinance would need to be amended, which would take at least 30 days. Councilmember Jerzak stated he didn’t want to introduce reefer madness to recess, and he misunderstood the buffers. He asked if part of the item could be approved while they work to revise the buffers. Ms. Tolar stated the Council has been asked to take action on capping the number of cannabis retailers in Brooklyn Center. The Council is welcome to amend the ordinance as they see fit. She explained the OCM is getting ready to issue licenses. The City needs a framework in place to avoid gaps. Mayor Graves asked if any Councilmembers or Staff have recommendations regarding a cap for cannabis retailers. Ms. Tolar stated many of the municipal clients of Kennedy Graven have implemented a cap in line with the State’s Statutory maximum. The cap doesn’t apply to medical marijuana businesses. Ms. McIntosh added the Planning Commission has acknowledged there is no financial incentive to capping or limiting cannabis retailers. There are many cannabis business license types beyond the retailers that cannot be capped. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated that Brooklyn Center doesn’t need more than three cannabis retailers in the City, which aligns with the State’s calculations for the minimum. Councilmember Jerzak agreed he doesn’t believe Brooklyn Center needs more than three. The market may become saturated both within Brooklyn Center and in the surrounding areas. Councilmember Moore agreed that capping the number of cannabis retailers is a good place to start. Page 15 of 221 4/14/25 -13- DRAFT It was the consensus of the Council to cap the number of cannabis retailers at three. Mayor Graves added that if Brooklyn Center’s population grows, they may need to allow a fourth retailer. Ms. Tolar stated the State is working to amend LPHE restrictions, so the City may be able to have its own business. Ms. Tolar pointed out that the Council previously decided to accept cannabis retail businesses on a lottery basis. If the City receives more than three applications, then it must conduct a lottery. Ms. Suciu suggested that the language of the cap aligns with the population-based measurement rather than a specific number of retailers. Mayor Graves confirmed the Council has reached a consensus for such language. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked if the potential change in legislation would allow the City to sell cannabis at their municipal store. Ms. Tolar clarified that the potential change would allow the City to sell LPHE at a municipal liquor store or municipal cannabis store. Councilmember Kragness asked for Staff to calculate how many feet the 300-foot buffer actually is in practice. Mayor Graves moved, and Councilmember Kragness seconded to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Brian B. explained he lives on the border of Minneapolis and Brooklyn Center. He stated he owns a cannabis microbusiness, and he plans to open a location in Brooklyn Center. He expressed his support for the proposed Ordinance. He pointed out that there is a significant difference between larger retailers and smaller cannabis retailers. Similarly, medical retailers are very different than recreational ones. Medical cannabis is extremely important for veterans like himself and others with medical concerns. Councilmember Kragness asked if Brian B.’s business would be subject to the cap. Ms. Tolar stated Brian B.’s business is a combination model of medical and recreational cannabis, so she would need to research the legal implications of the model. Kevin S. pointed out that many areas of the country are experiencing oversaturation and subsequent implosion. Also, cannabis retailers are unable to be insured, so any robberies put the business owner at a severe loss. Plus, the cannabis is very powerful. He stated the cap of three business retailers is the right choice. He added that the Police Department is already working at a reduced staffing level. Nahid K. explained that almost 30 percent of Brooklyn Center’s population is minors. Unfortunately, the State’s population calculation includes youth who cannot legally partake in Page 16 of 221 4/14/25 -14- DRAFT cannabis anyway. She asked why the youth were included in the calculation. Mayor Graves agreed it is a valid question. Mayor Graves moved, and Councilmember Kragness seconded to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Moore seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 2025- 04; Amending Chapter 23-2700 of the City of Brooklyn Center City Code to Establish Cannabis and Hemp Businesses Regulation. Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Moore seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2025- 041 for the summary publication of an ordinance amending chapter 23-2700 of the City of Brooklyn Center City Code to Establish Cannabis and Hemp Businesses Regulations. Motion passed unanimously. 8b. ORDINANCE NO. 2025-05 VACATING A CERTAIN PORTION OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF THE PLAT OF STEEN ADDITION IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited Assistant City Engineer Lydia Ener to continue the Staff presentation. Assistant City Engineer Lydia Ener explained that the Planning Commission has reviewed the final plat for Steen Addition. In connection with the final plat and easement dedication proceedings, the developer is requesting the release and termination of easements that are either no longer needed or are being replaced by new easements. Ms. Ener noted it is the Staff’s opinion that the easement proposed to be vacated is no longer needed and should not negatively affect rights to public easements. They were unaware of any entity objecting to the proposed vacation. Mayor Graves moved, and Councilmember Kragness seconded to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Ms. Ener pointed out that relevant parties had been notified of the Public Hearing, but Staff did not receive any communication regarding the item. Mayor Graves noted Julie B. had her hand raised on Zoom. Julie B. stated she had her hand raised for the previous item. Page 17 of 221 4/14/25 -15- DRAFT Mayor Graves moved, and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Moore moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to adopt RESOLUTION vacating a portion of a drainage and utility easement in the CAPI site redevelopment in connection with the proposed final plat of Steen Addition. Mayor Graves stated the item is an ordinance. Councilmember Moore stated that the recommended action is for a resolution. Motion passed unanimously. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS 10a. ORDINANCE NO.2025-06 ADDING A NEW SECTION TO CHAPTER 33 OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A LOCAL HOUSING TRUST FUND City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited Economic Development Manager Ian Alexander to continue the Staff presentation. Economic Development Manager Ian Alexander stated the Local Housing Trust Fund is a way to accept funds that may be used to help grow the City economically. Breanne Rothstein, the City’s consultant from Thrive Consulting, explained that a Local Housing Trust Fund is a policy in the form of an ordinance. It isn’t so much a fund as a separate bucket for dedicating resources to housing. The Fund can be used for multiple types of housing. Participation is a statement about a city’s commitment to housing to inspire contributions. The Fund would allow Brooklyn Center to access non-city resources for housing, access new resources for housing, and save money for larger projects. Once the money is in the Trust Fund, it must be used on housing efforts. Ms. Rothstein pointed out that each funding source will have its own set of requirements for spending, eligibility, and affordability levels. In addition to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) levy and Local Affordable Housing Aid (LAHA) from the sales tax, private donations, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME), Tax Increment Financing (TIF), and loan proceeds are other potential sources of funding for a local housing trust fund. Federal funds can be tricky to work with. Excess TIF could be put into a Local Housing Trust Fund. Ultimately, the Fund is extremely flexible. Ms. Rothstein added that the creation of the fund doesn’t require any money to be allocated to it. Page 18 of 221 4/14/25 -16- DRAFT Ms. Rothstein explained that Minnesota promoted the creation of the fund in 2024 by matching local contributions. There may be another matching effort in the future. Mayor Graves asked what other kinds of trust funds a city may open. Ms. Rothstein offered to research additional options. Councilmember Moore moved and Mayor Graves seconded to approve the first reading of an ORDINANCE adding a section to Chapter 33 of the Brooklyn Center City Code of Ordinances regarding the establishment of a Local Housing Trust Fund. Motion passed unanimously. 11. COUNCIL REPORT Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson reported on her attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: •Attended the Firefighters’ Relief Association Dinner. Councilmember Jerzak reported on his attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: •Attended the Firefighters’ Relief Association Dinner. •Attended the grand opening for Pollo Campero. •Testified at the State Capitol. •Met with several constituents. Councilmember Kragness reported on her attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: •Attended the Brooklyn Center Lions’ 70th Anniversary Dinner. •Met with youth. •Testified at the State Capitol advocating for a new Public Works site. •Attended the Firefighters’ Appreciation Dinner. Mayor Graves reported on her attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: •Attended the grand opening for Pollo Campero. •Participated in two one-on-one meetings with Dr. Edwards. •Met with the Cultural and Public Arts Commission. •Participated in her monthly meeting with the Mayor of Brooklyn Park. •Met with a group about partnering with the City for musical events. •Collaborated with the Brooklyn Bridge Alliance. Page 19 of 221 4/14/25 -17- DRAFT •Testified at the State Capitol advocating for a new Public Works site. 12. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Graves moved, and Councilmember Kragness seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 8:49 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Page 20 of 221 4/14/25 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WORK SESSION APRIL 14, 2025 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council/Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Work Session called to order by Mayor/President April Graves at 9:01 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor/President April Graves and Councilmembers/Commissioners Kris Lawrence-Anderson, Dan Jerzak, Teneshia Kragness, and Laurie Ann Moore. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards, Economic Development Manager Ian Anderson, Economic Development Coordinator Amy Loegering, and Deputy City Clerk Shannon Pettit. ACTIVE DISCUSSION ITEMS HOTEL ORDINANCE AMENDMENT City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited Economic Development Manager Ian Anderson to continue the Staff presentation. Economic Development Manager Ian Anderson pointed out that many City Departments were part of the effort. He explained there are a few hotels of concern in Brooklyn Center. The Brooklyn Center Police Department received over 2,000 calls for service to hotels in 2024. Inspections indicate health and safety issues, including fire safety concerns. The hotels have long-term lodgers, including family units, who need permanent housing and social services. Mr. Anderson stated that the current point system is keyed to police calls for service only and excludes inspection data. Hotels are issued a Level I license upon new ownership, and no initial inspection is required. License suspension, revocation, or non-renewal are the only enforcement tools, all of which require City Council/EDA approval. Mr. Anderson stated Staff hopes to reduce police calls through strategic interventions. They want to provide the Police Department with the ability to issue citations for certain violations, clarify the ordinance to better define the types of police contacts that are included in the license point calculation, and increase cooperation between hotels and law enforcement by eliminating points of calls initiated by hotel staff. Page 21 of 221 4/14/25 -2- DRAFT Mr. Anderson noted that another strategy is to increase fire and housing inspections to ensure hotels provide a safe, clean environment for lodgers. The changes would allow inspectors to issue citations for violations, require an inspection upon transfer of ownership before a new license is issued, and require ongoing annual inspections for all hotels prior to license renewal. Mr. Anderson added Staff also hopes to reduce the use of hotels as long-term housing by focusing strategies to identify vulnerable individuals to connect with permanent housing and allied services, coordinating with Hennepin County to provide housing and services, and including embedded social workers during inspections to connect with vulnerable parties. Mr. Anderson pointed out that the state of the hotels is troubling. The current ordinance lacks clarity. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak agreed that the current ordinance is insufficient and unenforceable. The City Council/EDA needs to reach a consensus about the goal of the ordinance. They may want to address trafficking, other crimes, excessive calls for service, or social issues. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak pointed out that Hennepin County handles the lodging inspections. Brooklyn Center doesn’t need to duplicate a licensing process. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak stated that some hotels consider police calls the cost of doing business. One hotel has hired someone to dispute the calls for service because it was the cheaper option for them. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak added that the County works with nonprofits to place vulnerable individuals in hotels. There was a situation where 19 Indigenous people were placed at a hotel. Due to the traumas they had experienced, they didn’t allow anyone to enter their rooms. Subsequently, no enforcement could be completed. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak stated that some people are hesitant to negatively impact licensing. However, there is no point in licensing if the regulations aren’t enforced. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak asked if the Staff has reached out to other cities that have faced similar issues. Robbinsdale, for example, has an ordinance regarding excessive consumption. Staff need to find out what is working elsewhere. Brooklyn Center has an alternative response strategy that could offer services to long-term lodgers in their downtime. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak pointed out that the proposed ordinance has been needed for a long time. Councilmember/Commissioner Kragness asked what the cost is for someone to live in a hotel long- term in comparison to affordable housing. Economic Development Coordinator Amy Loegering stated they were unable to determine the cost of long-term hotel stays. Those supporting the long- term hotel stays are very tight-lipped about the process. Page 22 of 221 4/14/25 -3- DRAFT Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak noted that a nonprofit may take a block of rooms and fill rooms as available. There are HIPAA regulations and other confidentiality standards that the nonprofits uphold. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak explained a situation where a hotel was required to have armed security. However, there was no way to enforce it. There wasn’t someone monitoring if the armed security was doing their job and addressing overly intoxicated folks or people sleeping in cars. It is difficult to enforce cameras and lighting as well. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak stated there is a line about graffiti and a seven-day timeline. However, there is another ordinance in place already addressing graffiti. Mr. Anderson asked if the City Council/EDA supports the proposed ordinance. Mayor/President Graves stated she supports the proposal. The components are rather straightforward. She asked for the reasoning for the change of points calculation, to avoid counting calls for service that originate with hotel managers, and to increase citation-issuing power for inspectors. Ms. Loegering stated that the current ordinance doesn’t define what a verified call is. Officers have taken the most conservative view of a verified call as ones that trigger a complaint. However, calls for service without an official complaint filed are being missed. Additionally, officers felt strongly that removing managerial calls for service would reduce friction and significantly improve relationships with hotels. There are ordinance requirements to maintain lighting and the like. Inspectors can write a citation for a broken light or graffiti. Inspectors are at the hotels most often. Increasing their ability to issue citations would be an impactful, preventative measure. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak pointed out that managers would pressure their employees to avoid calling the police, as it could change the licensing category for the hotel and, subsequently, the need to lay off employees. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak noted that the same system needs to be used to handle graffiti violations. The process for code enforcement by law enforcement and inspectors needs to be ironed out to avoid duplicating work. Police officers admit that they are not the experts on the City Code. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak offered to meet with Staff to provide more input based on his professional experience with code enforcement. Mayor/President Graves asked if Hennepin County is unfairly pushing the burden of unhoused individuals in Brooklyn Center hotels over other municipalities. If that is the case, then it needs to be addressed with the County. Councilmember/Commissioner Moore noted she has professional social worker experience with Hennepin County. It is difficult to find beds for people in need, even if they are transitional. Page 23 of 221 4/14/25 -4- DRAFT Mayor/President Graves pointed out that the City relies upon lodging taxes, and nonprofits putting vulnerable people in Brooklyn Center hotels. She has no desire to push anyone out of hotels that is in need of shelter. It is unfortunate if Brooklyn Center is carrying the weight of homelessness for the County, especially because it doesn’t have a strong tax base as it is. Affordable housing projects tend to go up in communities that are already struggling with finances and relevant services. Ultimately, it is an issue of equity. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak suggested they sit down with the County. Commissioner Lunde is their representative, but he can’t do much without the specifics of the undue burden Brooklyn Center has been given. Brooklyn Center has a lower cost for hotels, so many nonprofits are attracted to their hotels. Hotels have not been providing the proper services for folks hosted by nonprofits. Councilmember/Commissioner Moore asked if the Housing Commission could provide input on the topic. Mr. Anderson thanked Ms. Loegering for her work. COMMUNITY SAFETY AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION COMMISSION This item was postponed to a future meeting. ADJOURNMENT Mayor/President Graves moved, and Councilmember/Commissioner Kragness seconded adjournment of the City Council/Economic Development Authority Work Session at 9:31 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Page 24 of 221 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 5/5/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Shannon Pettit, Deputy City Clerk THROUGH: Barb Suciu, City Clerk BY: Shannon Pettit, Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Approval of Licenses Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve the licenses as presented. Background: The following businesses/persons have applied for City licenses as noted. Each business/person has fulfilled the requirements of the City Ordinance governing respective licenses, submitted appropriate applications, and paid proper fees. Applicants for rental dwelling licenses are in compliance with Chapter 12 of the City Code of Ordinances unless comments are noted below the property address on the attached rental report. Mechanical 4front Energy, 3230 Gorham Ave A&E Heating & Air Conditioning, 1841 161st LN NE Absolute Mechanical, 7338 Ohms Lane Ace Heating & Air Conditioning Inc, 7174 Hwy 95 NW Affordable Comfort Mechanical, 1167 Viking Dr E Air Express, Inc, P.O. Box 490400 AJ Mechanical LLC, 8939 Kirkwood Cir N API HVAC Services, 7450 Flying Cloud Drive Blue Yeti Services LLC, 6325 Cambridge St. Bonfes Plumbing Heating & Air Service, 455 Hardman Ave Bruce Nelson Plbg & Htg, 7012 6th Street North BWS Plumbing Heating and Air, 6321 Bury Drive Centerpoint Energy, 6161 Golden Valley Rd Comfort Matters Htg & Cooling Inc., 18071 Territorial Rd Commercial Plumbing & Heating, Inc., 24428 Greenway Ave Cool Air Mechanical, Inc, 1544 134th Ave NE Deans Home Services, 6701 Parkway Cir Ductech, LLC, 1022 S. Robert St. Elk River Heating & Air Conditioning Inc., 11110 Industrial Cir NW Faircon Service Company, 764 Vandalia St Genz-ryan Plbg & Htg Co, 2200 Highway 13 W Gr Mechanical, 12401 Ironwood Circle #500 Hearth & Home Technologies LLC, 7571 215th Street W Heating & Cooling Two Inc., 18550 County Rd 81 Hendrickson and Sons Plumbing, 28263 708th Ave Hero Home Services, 10900 Hampshire Ave S Hoffman Refrigeration & Heating, 5660 Memorial Ave N HOME ENERGY CENTER, 2415 Annapolis Lane N #170 Page 25 of 221 Jayhawk Mechanical Inc., 3307 N 2nd Street Joel Smith Heating & A/C, 4672 236th Ln NE KAB Plumbing LLC, 20725 196th Ave NW Larson Plumbing Inc., P.O. Box 459 MAJOR MECHANICAL LLC, 7601 NORTHLAND DRIVE N Master Mechanical, Inc., 1027 Gemini Rd Mechanical Air Systems, 6995 20th Ave N Midwest Electric and Generator, 10215 Twin Lakes Rd NW MK Mechanical Inc., 23996 Olinda Trail N MN Heating and Cooling LLC, 410 Pleasant Crest Cir Modern Heating & A/C, 2318 First Street NE Modern Plumbing, LLC, 16373 226th Ave NW Myles Mechanical, 17522 Concord Dr Nac Mechanical & Electrical Services, 1001 Labore Industrial Court, Ste. B North State Mechanical, 2283 Sycamore Tr. Northland Mechanical Contr, 9001 Science Center Dr Professional Mechanical Services, 19640 200th Ave NW Pronto Heating & A/C, 7415 Cahill Rd Ron the Sewer Rat, 875 Blue Gentian Road Rts Mechanical LLC, 795 Tower Drive St Marie Sheet Metal, 7940 Spring Lake Road NE St Paul Plumbing & Heating Co, (aka) Msp Plumbing, 640 Grand Ave Standard Heating & A/C, 130 Plymouth Ave N Street Plumbing Inc., 1201 Cliff Road East Sun Mechanical Inc., 10834 178th Circle Ty's Heating and A/C LLC, 12689 Zilla St NW Uhl Company Inc., 9065 Zachary Lane N Uneed HVAC, Inc., 4249 Edinbrook Terrace Warners Stellian Co Inc., 550 Atwater Circle Sign Hanger's License Scenic Sign Company, Po Box 881 Signcrafters Outdoor, 14050 Lincoln St NE Hospitality Accommodations Embassy Suites 6300 Earle Brown Dr, Brooklyn Center, MN Suburban Studios 2701 Freeway Blvd Garbage Haulers Ace Solid Waste 6601 McKinley St NW, Ramsey, MN Aspen Waste 2951 Weeks Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN Darling Ingredients 9000 382nd Ave, Blue Earth MN Suburban Waste MN LLC 7125 126th St W, Savage MN Page 26 of 221 Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Rental Criteria 2. For Council Approval 4.28.25 FOR COUNCIL 4.1 to 4.15 Page 27 of 221 Page 2 of 2 b.Police Service Calls. Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12-911, and events categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, auto theft and arson. Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the victim and suspect are “Family or household members” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (b) and where there is a report of “Domestic Abuse” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (a). License Category Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Service & Part I Crimes (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category Impact 1-2 0-1 3-4 units 0-0.25 5 or more units 0-0.35 Decrease 1 Category 1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 3-4 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 Categories 1-2 Greater than 3 3-4 units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria License Category (Based on Property Code Only) Number of Units Property Code Violations per Inspected Unit Type I – 3 Year 1-2 units 0-2 3+ units 0-0.75 Type II – 2 Year 1-2 units Greater than 2 but not more than 5 3+ units Greater than 0.75 but not more than 1.5 Type III – 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 5 but not more than 9 3+ units Greater than 1.5 but not more than 3 Type IV – 6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 9 3+ units Greater than 3 Page 28 of 221 Location Address License Subtype Renewal/Initial Owner Property Code Violations License Type Police CFS* Final License Type** Previous License Type*** Consecutive Type IV's 7230 West River Rd Multiple Family 1 Bldg 4 Units Initial Jack Keiffer 3 Type I N/A Type II N/A N/A 5841 Xerxes Ave N Single Initial SHENG ZHENG 56 Type IV N/A Type IV N/A 0 6243 France Ave N Single Initial FYR SFR TRS LLC 3 Type II N/A Type II N/A N/A 6337 June Ave N Single Initial Franlia Properties Llc 4 Type II N/A Type II N/A N/A 6925 France Ave N Single Initial ERIC STOKES 0 Type I N/A Type II N/A N/A 7131 Kyle Ave N Single Initial Philip L Littlefield 8 Type III N/A Type III N/A N/A 3501 47th Ave N Multiple Family 1 Bldg 11 Units Renewal 6939 Baird Llc 35 = 3.18 per unit Type IV 0 Type IV Type IV 4 3513 47th Ave N Multiple Family 1 Bldg 11 Units Renewal 6939 Baird Llc 39 = 3.55 per unit Type IV 0 Type IV Type IV 5 3601 47th Ave N Multiple Family 4 Bldgs 44 Units Renewal 8411 Balboa Llc 138 = 3.14 per unit Type IV 0 Type IV Type III 0 5306 Russell Ave N Two Family Renewal Jonathan & Donna Reinarz 0 Type I 0 Type I Type I N/A 2806 66th Ave N Single Renewal Thown Va Thor Met Requirements 1 Type I 0 Type I Type IV N/A 3125 66th Ave N Single Renewal Christina Duong & Danny Vo 2 Type I 0 Type I Type I N/A 5121 France Ave N Single Renewal Ih2 Property Illinois Lp Met Requirements 4 Type II 0 Type II Type III N/A 5337 Oliver Ave N Single Renewal Benyam M Sahle Did not meet requirements 6 Type III 0 Type IV Type IV 2 5410 Girard Ave N Single Renewal Cel Monton LLC 1 Type I 0 Type II Type III N/A 5619 Hillsview Rd Single Renewal John Glaubitz 1 Type I 0 Type I Type I N/A 5720 Logan Ave N Single Renewal Jenny Investments Llc Met Requirements 0 Type I 0 Type I Type III N/A 5925 Zenith Ave N Single Renewal SFR BORROWER 2022-1 LLC Did not meet requirements 6 Type III 0 Type III Type III N/A 5956 Beard Ave N Single Renewal SFR BORROWER 2021-2 LLC 11 Type IV 0 Type IV Type III 0 Rental Licenses for Council Approval 4.28.25 Page 29 of 221 6615 Camden Dr Single Renewal Johnson Organization Inc 1 Type I 0 Type I Type I N/A 7131 Indiana Ave N Single Renewal Jeremy Paskewich Met Requirements 3 Type II 0 Type II Type IV N/A *CFS = Calls for service for renewal licenses only (Initial licenses are not applicable to CFS and will be listed as N/A) **License type being issued ***Initial licenses will not show a Type I = 3 year, Type II = 2 year, Type III = 1 year, Type IV = 6 month All properties are current on City Utilities and taxes Page 30 of 221 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 5/5/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Kory Andersen Wagner, Public Works Planner THROUGH: Elizabeth Heyman, Director of Public Works BY: Shannon Pettit, Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Execution of a Professional Services Agreement, Project No. 2026-05, Humboldt Area Pedestrian Improvement Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve a Resolution Authorizing Execution of a Professional Services Agreement, Project No. 2026-05, Humboldt Area Pedestrian Improvement Background: The City of Brooklyn Center issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) on March 13, 2025, seeking professional services for the design of the Humboldt Area Pedestrian Improvements. The project includes: • Full Depth Reclamation on N Humboldt Avenue (65th Avenue N to 69th Avenue N) • Sidewalk installation on 67th Avenue N (N Humboldt Avenue to Dupont Avenue N) • Mill and Overlay on 65th Avenue N (N Humboldt Avenue to Camden Avenue N) • Pedestrian safety enhancements throughout the corridor SRF Consulting Group, Inc., was selected as the most qualified and cost-effective firm to carry out the project. SRF demonstrated a clear understanding of the scope, an experienced team, and an approach that aligns with City goals. Pending City Council approval on April 28, 2025, SRF will begin work in May 2025. Construction is anticipated to begin in spring 2027 and be completed in fall 2027. Budget Issues: The current estimated total project cost is $7,400,000, which includes design, land acquisition, construction administration, and construction. This project is programmed in the City's Capital Improvement Program. Lastly, $2,000,000 of the project costs are covered by a 2024 Metropolitan Council Regional Solicitation Award for Pedestrian Improvements. Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Page 31 of 221 Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Humboldt Area Project Phase 2 Consultant Selection Memo 2. Humboldt Area Project Phase 2 Consultant Selection Resolution 3. _SRF_Proposal for Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Improvements in the Humboldt Area - City Project 2026-05 Page 32 of 221 COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust DATE: April 28, 2025 TO: Dr. Reggie Edwards, City Manager THROUGH: Elizabeth Heyman, Public Works Director FROM: Kory Andersen Wagner, Public Works Planner SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Execution of a Professional Services Agreement, Project No. 2026-05, Humboldt Area Pedestrian Improvements Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the resolution authorizing execution of a Professional Services Agreement with SRF Consulting Group, Inc. for preliminary and final design services for Project No. 2026-05, Humboldt Area Pedestrian Improvements. Background: The City of Brooklyn Center issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) on March 13, 2025, seeking professional services for the design of the Humboldt Area Pedestrian Improvements. The project includes: • Full Depth Reclamation on N Humboldt Avenue (65th Avenue N to 69th Avenue N) • Sidewalk installation on 67th Avenue N (N Humboldt Avenue to Dupont Avenue N) • Mill and Overlay on 65th Avenue N (N Humboldt Avenue to Camden Avenue N) • Pedestrian safety enhancements throughout the corridor SRF Consulting Group, Inc., was selected as the most qualified and cost -effective firm to carry out the project. SRF demonstrated a clear understanding of the scope, an experienced team, and an approach that aligns with City goals. Pending City Council approval on April 28, 2025, SRF will begin work in May 2025. Construction is anticipated to begin in spring 2027 and be completed in fall 2027. Budget Issues: The current estimated total project cost is $7,400,000, which includes design, land acquisition, construction administration, and construction. $2,000,000 of this cost is covered by the 2024 Metropolitan Council Regional Solicitation Award for Pedestrian Improvements. Page 33 of 221 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. _______________ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, PROJECT NO. 2026-05, HUMBOLDT AREA PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City’s Capital Improvement Program identifies the Humboldt Area Pedestrian Improvements Project to be constructed in 2027; and WHEREAS, the City issued a Request for Proposals on March 13, 2025, for the provision of professional services for the design and delivery of said project; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute a professional services agreement with SRF Consulting Group, Inc., to provide design services for the Humboldt Area Pedestrian Improvements project. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 34 of 221 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Improvements in the Humboldt Area City Project 2026-05 SRFCONSULTING.COM Page 35 of 221 Marketing or promotional statements about SRF’s professional services are provided solely for general information and not as a contract commitment. Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55416 763.475.0010 www.srfconsulting.com In compliance with the Request for Proposals and to all conditions imposed therein, the undersigned offers and agrees to furnish the services in accordance with the attached signed proposal or as mutually agreed upon by subsequent negotiation. By signature hereto, the respondent certifies that all representations and certifications contained in its proposal are complete and accurate as required. SRF affirms, to the best of our knowledge, that this proposal does not present any conflicts of interest with any party or entity. April 3, 2025 Kory Andersen Wagner City of Brooklyn Center Subject: Proposal for the Humboldt Area Pedestrian Improvements Project (City Project 2026-05) Dear Kory and Members of the Selection Committee, Neighborhood infrastructure projects such as the Humboldt Area Pedestrian Improvements project require thoughtful planning and execution to ensure safety, accessibility, and minimal disruption to the community. The City is seeking a consulting partner that understands the importance of these elements and is committed to a collaborative approach. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. (SRF) is pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional engineering and consulting services that align with the City’s goals. Our team brings extensive experience in pedestrian infrastructure improvements, public engagement, and project management, and can leverage our experience and relationships with the agency partners at MnDOT to ensure that we meet and exceed the City’s expectations. A successful project depends on ongoing communication and proactive problem-solving. Our approach includes continuous engagement with City staff and stakeholders from project initiation through design development, public outreach, and final implementation. SRF is committed to transparency, responsiveness, and fostering trust within the community throughout all project phases. Key advantages of partnering with SRF for this project include: Effective, Consistent Communications. We will work closely with City staff to ensure alignment from the start, conducting regular check-ins and providing timely updates. Our team prioritizes clear and frequent communication to keep the project on track and maintain stakeholder confidence. Experienced Project Leadership. Our project team, led by Amber Ortlepp, PE, will provide expert oversight, coordination, and guidance to ensure the successful execution of the Humboldt Area Pedestrian Improvements project. Utilizing the knowledge gained during our current preliminary design of this project, we will build on that effort efficiently working toward final design. Amber has demonstrated effective project management and will continue through project end. We are dedicated to delivering a comprehensive and community-focused solution. We are excited about the opportunity to support the City of Brooklyn Center in enhancing pedestrian infrastructure and accessibility. We look forward to discussing this project in greater detail and demonstrating our commitment to delivering high-quality, sustainable solutions. Should you have any questions regarding our proposal, please feel free to contact Amber at 763.452.4774 or aortlepp@srfconsulting.com. Sincerely, Amber Ortlepp, PE Dave Nelson, PE Project Manager Vice President Page 36 of 221 CONTENTSTABLE OF Project Overview/Understanding ........................1 Deliverables ........................................1 Experience and Qualifications .........................3 Project Staff and Team ...............................4 Proposed Work Plan and Approach .....................6 Subconsultants ...................................10 Appendix A - SRF Detailed Cost Breakdown Appendix B - Braun Intertec Detailed Cost Breakdown Appendix C - Exceptions to Contract Page 37 of 221 SRF Consulting Group 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW/UNDERSTANDING Over the past 10 years, the area surrounding Brooklyn Center High School has seen numerous crashes involving bicycles or pedestrians, including two fatalities. As such the City of Brooklyn Center is committed to improving the area by providing safety improvements for pedestrians. The City secured funds from the 2024 Metropolitan Council Regional Solicitation for Pedestrian Facilities and was able to advance the project to the 2026 construction season. The project will include work on Humboldt Ave, 65/66th Ave, Camden Ave, Dupont Ave, and 67th Ave. Pedestrian crossing enhancements such as median refuges, curb extensions, and ADA compliant ramps are the main project goals. The project also includes pavement upgrades, i.e. full depth reclamation and mill and overlays, to facilitate a road diet which will in turn reduce crashes and improve safety. In addition to the project considerations identified to the right, the following page outlines additional issues and opportunities that we will address during preliminary and final design. SRF will deliver an approved bid package with final plans, specifications, cost estimates, and required permit applications, ensuring compliance with regulatory agency requirements. Our work will prioritize pedestrian safety, accessibility, and connectivity through close coordination with the City of Brooklyn Center, MnDOT, MnDOT State Aid, and other permitting agencies. Special considerations will be given to the following: Property Impacts. Construction limits will be defined at 60% design to allow time for the right of way process to conclude prior to construction. Construction Staging. Given the project proximity to schools, emergency service facilities, and local residences, construction staging is an important piece of final design. SRF will collaborate with City staff to develop staging alternatives and distinguish the least impactful staging plan for residents and the traveling public that also promotes a safe and efficient work zone. Active Transportation and Cooperative Agreement Processes. In order to lower the risk of project delays, SRF will develop a strong communication strategy with agency partners early in the design, adhere to the project description as was approved by the Transportation Advisory Board, and meet the minimum design guidance from the MnDOT Facility Design Guide. DELIVERABLES SRF will provide a comprehensive set of deliverables to support the successful planning, design, and implementation of pedestrian improvements in the Humboldt area. Our team will ensure that all deliverables align with project objectives, regulatory requirements, and community needs, guiding the process from conceptual design through final documentation. The following outlines the key deliverables we will provide as part of our approach to this project. • Schedule, facilitate, and document project meetings • Updated monthly project schedule • Monthly invoices • QA/QC documentation • Attend public engagement meetings and provide City staff with meeting materials • Prepare meeting minutes and consolidate public comments received • Utility layouts and plans provided to utility owners • Utility coordination meeting minutes and documentation • Level 2 Geometric Layout and Design Memorandum for Highway 100/Humboldt Ave/65th Ave intersection • Signal Justification Report • Draft and final preliminary layout • Preliminary cost estimate • Feasibility Report • Staging Layouts • Approved bid package for construction letting • 60, 90, and 100 percent cost estimates and plans • Cost-sharing estimate • Final certified plans and specifications • Design data • Stormwater Management Report Page 38 of 221 SRF Consulting Group 2 R i v e r w o o d Humboldt Ave N H u m b o l d t A v e N J a m es Ave N Irv i n g Av e N 70 t h Ave N 70th Ave N Hum b o l d t Av e N 6 9 t h A v e N69th Ave N 67th Ave N 67th Ave N J a m e s Av e N E m e r s o n A v e N Irving Ln N F r e mont P l N 6 3 r d L n 6 5th Ave N H u m b o l d t A v e N James Cir N 64 t h Av e N W River Rd 70th Av e N B r y a n t A v e N D u p o n t A v e N 69th Av e N D a l l a s Rd 6 6 t h A v e N 6 6 t h A v e N 70th Ave N 6 8 t h L n N 5 t h S t N C a m d e n A v e N A l d r i c h A v e N C o l f a x A v e N W R i v e r R d Willow Ln D u p o n t A v e N B r y a n t A v e N C o l f a x A v e N E m e r s o n A v e N L il a c D r N C a m d e n A v e N 6 3 r d L n Willow Ln W i l l o w L n Willow Ln Brooklyn Center High School Brooklyn Center East Fire Station Brooklyn Center East Fire Station Brooklyn Center Police Department Brooklyn Center Police Department 252 100 67TH AVE (HUMBOLDT AVE TO DUPONT AVE) Construction of sidewalk = Pedestrian Enhancement Location CAMDEN AVE - Mill and Overlay Potential sidewalk construction on east side of Camden Ave 65TH AVE/66TH AVE - Mill and Overlay - Potential to add medians to enhance crossing safety and curb extensions Coordination with private utilities early and determine relocations Coordination with Brooklyn Center Community Schools on fence relocation Consolidate traffi c lanes and develop Level 2 layout for MnDOT approval Coordination with Metro Transit to fulfi ll bus stop needs Potential RRFB location Potential for a mini-roundabout HUMBOLDT AVE (65TH AVE TO 69TH AVE) - Full depth pavement reclamation - Road diet opportunity, potential to add medians to enhance crossing safety, reconstruction of west sidewalk. ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES MAP Potential for a mini-roundabout 1 2 3 4 We could probably add in some specific site photos to this page to fill it out more. Right now I have it as 8.5x11, but we can go up to 11x17 if we want Issues and Opportunities Students crossing 65th Street in front of the High School 65th Ave at Dupont Ave - Potential Mini-roundabout location Future location of curb extension mid-block crossing on Dupont Ave Humboldt Ave at 67th Ave - Potential RRFB location 1 2 3 4 Page 39 of 221 SRF Consulting Group 3 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Established in 1961, SRF Consulting Group is headquartered in Minneapolis and employs more than 400 engineers, planners, and designers who work with public sector clients across the Midwest. SRF’s award-winning projects range from designing city streets and bridges to planning statewide transportation systems to revitalizing neighborhoods and urban spaces. We are committed to delivering quality that stands the test of time, striving for innovation and sustainability, providing superior service, and being true to the spirit of collaboration. Our long-term client relationships reflect our ability to provide quality services and creative solutions that make a difference. The SRF Team has specific project experience with several similar projects. The following summaries provide brief descriptions of some of SRF’s recent projects. Brooklyn Center Pedestrian Improvements Preliminary Design The City of Brooklyn Center requested SRF to begin preliminary design for the pedestrian improvements project after helping the city secure grant funding for the project. The goal of the project is to complete a City approved design layout that fulfills the description provided in the TAB grant application, which includes construction of sidewalk, ADA compliant ramps, curb extensions, and median refuges. SRF has successfully collaborated with City staff and other stakeholders throughout this project. 36th and Wooddale The City of St. Louis Park hired SRF to develop final design plans for pedestrian and signal improvements for the intersections of 36th St at Wooddale Ave and at Xenwood Ave. The project goal was to improve vehicle mobility and bring the pedestrian crossings into ADA compliance. SRF also provided construction administration services for the project. Columbia Heights SRTS SRF is the lead design firm for the 2024 Columbia Heights Safe Routes to School Project. The goal of the project is to enhance pedestrian safety and security, promote a healthy environment through walkability, and provide better accessibility to schools and other destinations. The project focuses on the 49th Avenue area which includes Valley View Elementary School, Columbia Academy, Columbia Heights High School, and Highland Elementary School. The project design assists in removing pedestrian gaps/ barriers, improving connections, and maintaining system compliance. SRF has collaboratively coordinated will the City of Columbia Heights, Anoka County, MnDOT State Aid, Columbia Heights Public Schools, and utility owners to aid in meeting the Plans previously established for enhancing the community network. 106th Street at I-35W Interchange Recommended Interchange Looking East Before 106th Street at I-35W Interchange The City of Bloomington hired SRF to develop an interchange concept at I-35W and 106th Street that would improve operations and safety in the existing interchange area. SRF coordinated with the City’s residents, emergency services and school district to develop an interchange concept that provides designated trails/walkways for safer routes to school, improves sight lines for vehicles and pedestrians, reduces conflict points through the closure of the frontage road, and improves traffic operation for future volumes. Engagement efforts were key for the project team to coordinate with stakeholders to ensure the safety goals of this project were met. Snelling/CR E Roundabout SRF was retained by Ramsey County to perform a traffic study and geometric design for the intersection of County Road E/Lake Johanna Boulevard and Old Snelling Avenue, located in the City of Arden Hills. This important and busy intersection has a wide variety of users including passenger cars, semi-trucks, pedestrians and bicyclists. A single lane roundabout was identified as the optimum solution to improve safety and mobility while reducing delays. SRF recently finalized plans, secured permits, and was subsequently engaged by Ramsey County to oversee construction last summer. Dupont Ave Reclamation SRF provided preliminary and final design, public involvement, and construction management for the reconstruction of Dupont Avenue (57th Ave to 73rd Ave) in Brooklyn Center. Spanning under two miles, the project required maintaining access to 140 residences, two schools, and a fire station. As a Minnesota State Aid Route originally built in the 1960s, improvements ranged from mill and overlay to full pavement replacement, with curb and sidewalk upgrades as needed. Traffic calming measures included curb-chokers with integrated rain gardens for stormwater treatment and aesthetics. Utility upgrades addressed watermain, sanitary, and storm sewer replacements, requiring extensive coordination with private utilities. The project was successfully completed while ensuring continuous access and essential services. Page 40 of 221 SRF Consulting Group 4 PROJECT STAFF AND TEAM Amber Ortlepp, PE | Project Manager Amber has 19 years of experience including the development of preliminary design and final design plans for both municipal and highway projects. His expertise spans transportation engineering, traffic control, and roadway and roundabout design. Known for her calm, collaborative approach and attention to detail, Amber fosters trust and efficiently resolves challenges. Her strong communication skills and diligent management consistently deliver complex, multi-jurisdictional projects on time and within budget, ensuring client goals are met effectively. Amber received her BCE from the University of Minnesota. Brooklyn Center Pedestrian Improvements Preliminary Design. Amber is currently the project manager for the preliminary design efforts for the City of Brooklyn Center’s Pedestrian Improvements Project. She has managed stakeholder collaboration to develop a City-approved design layout aligning with the TAB grant application, incorporating sidewalks, ADA-compliant ramps, curb extensions, and median refuges. Amber also coordinated with City staff and key stakeholders to ensure project goals and community needs were met. West 36th Street/Wooddale Avenue Intersection Improvement, St Louis Park, Minnesota. Amber was the lead roadway design engineer. She developed the final plans, specifications, and estimates for the project. CSAH 19 (Woodbury Drive) Mobility and Safety Improvement Project, Washington County, Minnesota. This project expanded the roadway to a four-lane urban section that includes a multi-lane roundabout at the intersection of Dale Rd and trails on both sides of the road to facilitate the rapid residential and commercial development. Amber was the deputy project manager/lead designer on the project. Washington County CSAH 18 (Bailey Road) Safety and Improvement Projects, Woodbury, Minnesota. Amber was the lead designer for three reconstruction projects along the Bailey Road corridor. The final design of these projects included upgrading a signalized intersection into a roundabout and conversion to a four-lane divided roadway with improved pedestrian facilities. Quality Manager Mike Turner, PE Public Involvement Dan McNiel, AICP Project Manager Amber Ortlepp, PE Core Design Team Project EngineerAmber Ortlepp, PE Design Support and Utility CoordinationEmily Quandt, PE Multimodal/PedestrianChris Brown, AICP, PTP Traffic Clayton Bayer, PE, PTOE Drainage and PermitsDustin Anderson, PE Public UtilitiesEmily Quandt, PE LightingSteve McHenry, PE Construction StagingAmber Ortlepp, PE Topographic Survey Nathan Vaughn, PLS Agency Coordination • MnDOT • State Aid • Metro Transit • Brooklyn Center Schools • Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission • Emergency Services City of Brooklyn Center Kory Andersen Wagner Lead Inspector Dan Herzog, PE Right of Way Ken Helvey Organizational Chart SRF brings extensive expertise in project coordination, traffic analysis, engineering, and public engagement. We have assembled our most experienced team to efficiently meet the project objectives outlined in the RFP. Our strong relationships with involved agencies and expertise in delivering both pedestrian level improvements as well as street, pavement and roundabout design improvements will help streamline reviews and approvals by ensuring compliance with requirements and schedules. As shown in the organizational chart below, our in-house technical experts are well-equipped to deliver this project without the need for subconsultants at this time. Phase I & II ESA (Optional) Braun Intertec Page 41 of 221 SRF Consulting Group 5 Mike Turner, PE | Quality Manager Mike has 30 years of experience and is respected as an excellent design engineer and project manager. He has a reputation for his attention to detail and ability to complete projects under tight deadlines, making him perfect to oversee all QA/QC Review. Over the years, Mike’s work has focused on municipal engineering projects, specifically the design and construction of complex roadways and pedestrian improvement projects. He has successfully designed and assisted with the implementation of many State and Federal Aid and Cooperative Agreement projects. Mike received his BCE from the University of Minnesota, Institute of Technology. Dan McNiel, AICP | Public Involvement With eight years of experience in public engagement and planning, Dan has facilitated meaningful input for infrastructure projects, ensuring opportunities to educate and involve community members. Committed to accessible and responsive outreach, he focuses on incorporating underrepresented perspectives into planning processes, fostering inclusive and impactful community engagement. Dan received his Bachelor of Individualized Studies in Communications, Management, and American Indian Studies and his Master of Urban and Regional Planning, both from the University of Minnesota. Emily Quandt, PE | Design Support and Utility Coordination Emily has six years of experience in concept development, preliminary design, final design, and construction inspection. Emily assisted with the preliminary and final design of the reconstruction of Brooklyn Boulevard, which included pedestrian facility design, 3D modeling, intersection design, utility coordination, and cost estimating. Emily received her BCE from the University of Minnesota. Chris Brown, AICP, PTP | Multimodal/Pedestrian Chris has 11 years of experience managing and supporting corridor studies, multimodal projects, SRTS studies, and grant writing. As a planner, Chris strives to enhance mobility options, accessibility, and safety for those of all ages and abilities through detailed data analysis, comprehensive community outreach, and using the latest tools and best practices. Chris received his MBA and Master of Urban and Regional Planning from the University of Colorado-Denver and his BS is Urban Studies from the University of Minnesota. Clayton Bayer, PE, PTOE | Traffic Clayton has more than 10 years of experience in traffic and transportation engineering. He is primarily involved with traffic signal design, signing/pavement marking design, temporary traffic control plans, and construction inspection. Additionally, he has been involved in asset management projects with several agencies. He has also played key roles in completing traffic management plans and intersection control evaluation (ICE) and signal justification reports. Clayton received his BCE from the University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire. Dustin Anderson, PE | Drainage Dustin has nine years of experience working on city municipal roadways, county highways, and state highways. He has performed preliminary hydraulic design through final storm sewer design on a wide variety of projects. Dustin is proficient in culvert design, storm sewer design, hydrologic design, hydraulic analysis, and water quality analysis as well as construction plan preparation and review. Dustin received his BCE from Minnesota State University - Mankato. Steve McHenry, PE | Lighting Steve has 35 years of expertise in electrical engineering, Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), National Transportation Communication for ITS Protocol (NTCIP), control systems, and solar power systems. Steve also led the development of embedded firmware for ITS equipment controllers and web-based ATMS software for ITS devices in numerous ITS-related protocols, platform tools, and programming languages. Steve received his BS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin - Platteville. Nathan Vaughn, PLS | Topographic Survey Nathan has led major construction, geospatial, and land survey projects across the country. His more than 20 years of experience in geospatial and land surveying encompassing topographic, right-of-way, PLS corner restoration, NGS leveling projects, boundary surveys, construction survey, as well as mobile and terrestrial LiDAR and GIS data collection and processing. Nathan received his BS in Geography from the University of Wisconsin - Whitewater. Ken Helvey | Right of Way Since 1993, Ken has provided public and private sector clients with project management, acquisition, compilation of information to prepare work files, coordination of appraisals, negotiations with land owners to acquire right of way and settle damages, completion of relocation services, recording of pertinent documents, and closing of files and preparation of closing documents. Ken received his BA in Political Science from the University of Minnesota and is licensed as a Real Estate Broker in the state of Minnesota. Dan Herzog, PE | Lead Inspector Dan has more than 10 years of experience including coordination with contractors, construction observation, construction inspection, measurements for quantity calculations, managing and administering contract requirements and change orders, and project certification of workmanship and materials per State and Federal Aid requirements. Dan received his BS in Civil Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Platteville. Page 42 of 221 SRF Consulting Group 6 Project Management Amber Ortlepp will be the Consultant Project Manager for the project and will facilitate regular communication with the City Project Manager to: • Provide updates on works tasks and deliverables • Review and manage the schedule and next steps • Coordinate project team members including the SRF Team, city staff, and key project stakeholders like MnDOT, MnDOT State Aid, and Metro Transit. Amber will lead day-to-day project coordination efforts, oversee project meetings, including scheduling, preparation of materials, and documentation. The SRF Team is committed to delivering high-quality products that meet Brooklyn Center’s expectations and project goals. Amber will be supported by Mike Turner who will develop and oversee the Project-Specific Quality Management Plan (QMP) to meet standards, reduce risk, and enhance design and cost efficiency. Mike will assist with internal quality checks that will be performed on each deliverable to ensure accuracy and completeness. Quality is one of our core values and is infused throughout our company from project managers through individual technicians, engineers, and planners. The net effect of SRF’s quality check will be to provide the City with quality deliverables which helps ensure competitive bids, on time construction and better adherence to project budget through less field changes and costly change orders. PROPOSED WORK PLAN AND APPROACH This section provides a description of the SRF Team work plan and identifies major tasks to be accomplished. The work plan is also used as a scheduling and managing tool and will be the basis for invoicing and progress updates to the City Project Manager. The SRF Team approach to the project will use methods we have developed during many years of experience. Our team emphasizes a strong commitment to project management and coordination. Our team will bring the energy and creative solutions to work through difficult design issues that arise and will continue to work as the City’s driving force to deliver this project. As an initial step of the project, Amber Ortlepp and the SRF Team will continue the preliminary design work already underway and start to involve other groups including Traffic Engineering and Design, Drainage, and Right of Way. Clayton Bayer and the SRF Traffic Engineering Design team will provide traffic analysis services and reports that will facilitate the MnDOT Level 2 Layout approval process for the intersection improvements at Highway 100, Humboldt Avenue, and 65th Avenue. A Project Feasibility Report will wrap up the preliminary design phase of the project. The report will provide an overview of the existing conditions, proposed improvements, and estimated project costs and funding sources. The project has the potential to, at a minimum, temporarily impact properties within the project area. SRF will work to minimize those impacts and identify right of way needs and coordinate with property owners and City staff. In the final design phase of the project, SRF will develop 60%, 90%, and Final Construction Plans, cost estimates, and Project Manual, delivered in accordance with MnDOT Cooperative Agreement project guidelines and standards, and the goals approved by TAB. Page 43 of 221 SRF Consulting Group 7 Public Involvement We understand that City of Brooklyn Center staff will lead much of the public engagement required to complete final design and construction. Dan McNiel will help prioritize a process that prepares compelling visuals and plain language materials to help achieve engagement goals and ultimately community-supported improvements for all roadway users. A neighborhood meeting, public hearing, and project fact sheets will clearly explain the purpose of the project, show visuals of the planned improvements, and how to stay informed about the project through construction. UNIVERSITY AVENUE S E A N D FOURTH STREET SE PROJECT Reconstruction of University A v e n u e SE and Fourth Street SE.•University Avenue: From Ba n k Street to Tenth Street.•Fourth Street: From Central Avenue to Tenth Street.The pavement has reached the e n d o f its useful life and is in need of r e p a i r s . A protected, sidewalk level bi k e f a c i l i t y will be installed. The I-35W Univ e r s i t y Avenue and Fourth Street brid g e s will be replaced, and raised to m e e t bridge height standards. This p r o j e c t will also include improvement s t o m e e t Americans with Disabilities Act ( A D A ) standards, and bus stop improv e m e n t s to correspond with the upcom i n g E Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) r o u t e . SE 4th and SE University Ave Project Roadway Area Project Bridge Area 35W SE 2 n d S t SE M a i n S t SE U n i v e r s i t y A v e SE 4 t h S t SE 5 t h S t Holmes Park Father Hennepin Bluff Park Mis s i s s i p p i R i v e r SE 6 t h S t SE 7 t h S t SE 8 t h A v e SE C e n t r a l A v e MINNEAPOLISMINNEAPOLIS SE 7 t h A v e SE 6 t h A v e SE 4 t h A v e SE 3 r d A v e SE 5 t h A v e SE 2 n d A v e Ba n k S t Univ e r s i t y A v e Project Description Adjacent Projects •University Ave and Fourth St P r o j e c t(Hennepin County)•Highway 47 Project (MnDO T )•F Line BRT (Metro Transit) Spring 2024 Public and Stakeholder Engagement Summer 2024-Winter2025 Preliminary Design Approvals & Final Geometric Layout 2025-2026 Final Design Spring 2027 Construction Schedule Stakeholders •Metro Transit•Hennepin County•City of Minneapolis•University of Minnesota•Minneapolis Park and Recreatio n B o a r d•Community Stakeholders›Marcy Holmes Neighborhood Association›UMN Student Life›Southeast Seniors Key Project Area Improvem e n t s•Reconstruct I-35W Universit y Avenue and 4th Street bridg e s•Roadway reconstruction incl u d i n g infrastructure enhancements .•Lane adjustments along Univ e r s i t y Avenue immediately west of C e n t r a lAvenue•New E Line BRT stations(Metro Transit led)•Protected sidewalk level bike f a c i l i t i e s(Figure 1 ) 20 2 4 20 2 5 20 2 6 20 2 7 Figure 1 New Sidewalk Level Bicycle Faci l i t i e s Example graphics and fact sheets that SRF has recently developed Additionally, we recommend project information be shared via the City of Brooklyn Center’s website. The SRF Team will work with the City’s project manager to ensure residents have access to meaningful information and the project is actively engaging key stakeholders. We have learned from experiences that transparency is vital to building trust and maintaining active engagement throughout the planning process. Website content will align with the City’s branding and include an overview of the planned roadway and pedestrian improvements, project updates, schedule, and contact information. In addition to providing community updates via the project webpage, the engagement plan will leverage traditional promotional tools, including City Watch newsletter, email notification, press releases, social media advertising, and posted on bulletin boards at community spaces. Utility Coordination Emily Quandt will lead Utility Coordination and follow a straightforward Utility Coordination Process. Emily will first conduct a Gopher State One Call to verify existing utility information is accurate and aligns with topographic survey. A utility layout will be created and shared with utility owners to confirm depiction and act as an early Utility Information Meeting exhibit to initiate discussions regarding potential relocations. Emily will continue to engage and work with utility owners to discuss the project and help plan their relocation work ahead of project construction. Survey A review of the survey provided by the City will be conducted by Nathan Vaughn and Emily to identify additional survey needs early in the project to maintain schedule and minimize design impacts. The survey review will focus on areas that typically need a higher level of survey data for critical design data such as elevations. Right of Way and Easements Ken Helvey has the experience and resources to provide the real estate services required for this project. Our acquisition activities comply with the Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, as well as all State (MnDOT) guidelines as specified in the State Aid Manual - Chapter 5.2. Because the Active Transportation Regional Sales Tax Funding are not federal funds, a R/W Certificate No. 1 or a R/W Certificate No. 1-A will not be needed. Layout This task includes the design activities required to develop a MnDOT Level 2 Geometric Layout of the improvements at the intersection of Highway 100, Humboldt Avenue, and 65th Avenue. A Design Memo will also be prepared as a way to summarize the project’s design standards and document design decisions. A critical element of the layout is to confirm that any lane reassignments will not infringe on the existing signal operations. Clayton Bayer will prepare a Signal Justification Report (SJR) for this intersection consistent with MnDOT State Aid requirements. Thirteen-hour traffic counts will be collected to perform a warrant analysis to ensure traffic signal control at this intersection is still warranted based on the procedures outlined in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD). This report will be submitted to the City and MnDOT for review and comments. Once comments have been addressed, we will then coordinate with stakeholder agencies for SJR approval and final signatures. The SJR will supplement the geometric layout and Design Memo. SRF has extensive experience with layout development, and we will apply our knowledge, engage State Engineers early, and follow the MnDOT process. Feasibility Report and Preliminary Design Amber will refine the preliminary layout that has been developed previously by utilizing the Geotechnical Report and the existing utility inspection reports provided by the City. A field walk will also be conducted to determine and document existing curb, pavement, and utility conditions. SRF will review the geotechnical report provided by the City and determine if any additional borings or information is needed. Amber will work closely with City staff to make sure all pertinent improvements are incorporated into the preliminary layout and Feasibility Report. A project Feasibility Report will be created to provide the public with insight into the purpose and details of the project. The public-facing report will document project background Page 44 of 221 SRF Consulting Group 8 information, the roadway and utility existing conditions, the proposed improvements, and estimated costs and associated funding sources. The preliminary design phase will solidify proposed geometric improvements, identify right of way needs, and determine which existing public utilities will be replaced and rehabilitated. Final Construction Plans Continuing with the refined design, SRF will analyze two construction staging alternatives. This item will be critical as the project will need to remain open for emergency services and all residents along the corridors. Project construction duration and timing will also be scrutinized as it relates to the Brooklyn Center Community Schools schedules and bus routes. The staging alternatives will be compared based on impacts to project cost and construction duration to inform a decision on the best staging option. SRF will prepare construction plans for the project based on City of Brooklyn Center standards, the guidelines and standards for a MnDOT Cooperative Agreement Project, State Aid design guidelines, and other accepted design standards. Construction plans, specifications, and cost estimates will be prepared based on the preliminary layout. Draft plans and cost estimates will be submitted at the following milestone points to provide an opportunity for agency review and comment: • 60% - Draft plans of typical sections, detours, construction staging, alignment plans and tabulations, inplace utility, removals, construction plans and profiles, proposed utilities, and cross sections. • 90% - Complete plan set, which incorporates all previous agency comments and allows for a comprehensive review and final input. • 100% - Final submittal will be provided to the City for final approval. This will also include final cost estimates with complete cost sharing breakdowns by funding source, and Project Manual. Stormwater Management Report Dustin Anderson will work closely with our ADA design team. We understand that these two design elements strongly impact each other when determining curb profile grades, gutter slopes, and catch basin placement. Also, since Humboldt Avenue and 65th Avenue are State Aid roads the design must meet State Aid standards for storm sewer sizing and allowable spread. We reviewed the proposed typical section change on Humboldt Avenue with respect to allowable spread. Due to the proposed shoulder width increase we expect the allowable spread to increase, which would not require additional catch basins and storm sewer to meet State Aid Standards. SRF will review the project improvements and the need for stormwater treatment. The project will need to meet the standards of the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission, the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit, and the City Ordinances. Based on our understanding, the proposed mill and overlay and full depth reclamation activities will not expose the underlying soil beneath the pavement section. As a result, stormwater treatment is not expected to meet stormwater permitting requirements. We will confirm this immediately upon NTP with our regulatory partners. All stormwater computations and a narrative will be included in a final Stormwater Management Report. Amber will provide assistance in the preparation of documents to be used in the bidding process, respond to bidder questions, prepare and issue addenda, and prepare an award recommendation letter. Optional Tasks As we have prepared this scope of services we have identified the following optional tasks that may be required or desired by the City to deliver a successful and comprehensive project. Roundabout Justification Reports for 2 intersections - SRF can prepare roundabout justification reports (RJR) for the potential roundabouts at 65th Ave and Dupont Ave and/or Humboldt Ave and 69th Ave to be consistent with MnDOT State Aid requirements. Traffic counts would be collected to properly analyze the intersections. The report will review crash data, perform operational analysis, and conduct a warrant analysis. SRF would submit the RJRs for review and comments. Once comments have been addressed, we will then coordinate with stakeholder agencies for RJR approval and final signatures. Roundabout Design - If it is determined that a roundabout will be the preferred design at the intersection of Humboldt Avenue and 69th Ave and/or at 65th Avenue and Dupont Ave, SRF will refine the mini roundabout design and include it in the preliminary layout and final design tasks. Roundabouts would require additional design services from drainage, lighting, and possibly public utilities. In addition, construction staging and traffic control can become more complicated; SRF will work with City staff to develop options regarding roadway closures. Our drainage group will also determine if stormwater treatment is necessary and will work with regulatory partners on any permitting requirements. Draft Operations & Maintenance guidance for stormwater treatment infrastructure – SRF Water Resources staff will develop guidelines and recommendations for long term maintenance of any added stormwater infrastructure upon request from the City. Phase I and Phase II ESA – SRF will coordinate with Joseph Foline, of Braun Intertec, to perform Environmental Site Assessments upon request. Construction Support – SRF is available to provide construction administration with an experienced, fully MnDOT-certified inspector. SRF staff would coordinate regularly with the contractor, residents, and city staff. Additionally, SRF staff would review the project area for safe access of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. SRF staff would focus on reviewing work quality of the contractor, daily construction diaries, quantity documentation by established funding groups, including materials testing review and coordination. Right of Way (Temporary Easements Only) – SRF will make efforts in design to minimize impacts to properties, however given the placement of new and reconstructed sidewalk there is a potential to impact additional properties. SRF will provide right of way services necessary to complete the project. Page 45 of 221 SRF Consulting Group 9 Schedule SRF has developed the following schedule to account for the potential for easement acquisition. It will be important to establish construction limits at the 60% plans, so the acquisition process can commence, allowing for a 2026 project letting (our understanding is the Active Transportation Regional Sales Tax Funding requires a 2026 Letting), with a majority of construction in 2027, wrapping up before school start in late summer 2027. 2025 2026 M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 1. Project Management - AmberOrtlepp/SRF Monthly Invoices/Weekly Conference Calls Agency meetings Design Quality Management Plan 2. Public Engagement - Dan McNeil/SRF Meetings Fact Sheets 3. Utility Coordination - Emily Quandt/SRF Meetings and Utility Coordination Review Relocation Plans/Permit Apps 4. Topographic Survey - Emily Quandt/SRF Review and City Survey 5. R/W Services - Ken Helvey/SRF Legal Descriptions and Parcel Exhibits Minimum Damage Acquisition (MDA) Reports Acquisition Process (Off ers, Negotiation, Settlements) Eminent Domain (if necessary) 6. MnDOT Staff Approved Layout - Amber Ortlepp/SRF Level 2 Intersection Layout and SJR 7. Feasibility Report & Preliminary Design - Amber Ortlepp/SRF Review Information Provide Recommendations Preliminary Layout and Cost Feasibility Report 8. Final Construction Plans - Amber Ortlepp/SRF 60% Plans, Construction Limits, and Cost Estimate 90% Plans, Project Manual, Cost Estimate, Permitting 100% Plans, Project Manual, Cost Estimate, Permitting Approvals Advertisement Bid Letting/Contracting 9. Construction and Administration 2027 Notice To Proceed Schedule Letting in November 2026. Construction Complete Before School Starts Fall 2027 GSOC GSOCMM NM NMAHPH Crital Path Connection NM = Neighborhood Meeting PH = Public Hearing AH = Assessment Hearing GSOC = Gopher State One Call M = Meeting Page 46 of 221 SRF Consulting Group 10 Hours/Cost Breakdown Below is a summary of our proposed cost breakdown. A detailed cost breakdown can be found in Appendix A. SUBCONSULTANTS If it is determined that a Phase I and Phase II ESA are necessary, SRF has partnered with Braun Intertec to complete this optional task consistent with the attached scope and proposal and as identified in the Optional Tasks above. TASK TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH SUPPORT TOTAL EST. FEE 1.0 Project Management 24 -130 -20 ----174 $34,676 2.0 Public Involvement --20 48 24 ----92 $14,792 3.0 Utility Coordination --4 -12 40 40 --96 $12,380 4.0 Topographic Survey --4 -4 ----8 $1,356 5.0 Right-of-Way and Easements 4 10 5 30 70 ---5 124 $19,236 6.0 MnDOT Staff Approved Geometric Layout --10 -16 54 -8 -108 $14,408 7.0 Feasibility Report and Preliminary Design --54 -70 28 ---184 $27,978 8.0 Final Construction Plans --104 56 260 516 200 106 -1,242 $167,324 Total Estimated Person Hours 28 10 331 134 476 638 292 114 5 2,028 Average Hourly Billing Rates $264 $185 $196 $155 $143 $130 $117 $100 $138 Estimated Labor and Overhead $7,392 $1,850 $64,876.$20,770 $68,068 $82,940 $34,164 $11,400 $690 $292,150 Estimated Direct Non-Salary Expenses $4,650 Total Estimated Fee (without optional tasks)$296,800 Optional Tasks 9.1 Roundabout Justification Report --6 --34 ---40 $5,596 9.2 Roundabout Design --20 40 -40 40 20 -160 $22,000 9.3 Draft Operations & Maintenance Guidance for stormwater treatment infrastructure ---16 -----16 $2,480 9.4 Phase I and Phase II ESA --4 -------$784 Braun Intertec Services (see Appendix B for more detail)$53,273 9.5 Construction Administration and Inspection $231,000 9.6 Right of Way (Temporary Easements Only)23 30 -60 111 --14 -238 $46,389 Total Estimated Person Hours 23 30 47 116 145 74 40 34 0 509 Estimated Direct Non-Salary Expenses (Title Reports - 17 reports at $250 each)$4,250 Total Estimated Optional Tasks $365,772 Total Estimated Fee (with optional tasks)$662,572 Page 47 of 221 APPENDIX A - SRF DETAILED COST BREAKDOWN 4/1/2025 Page 1 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Improvements in the Humboldt Area Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.SUMMARY OF TASKS Project Overview: 11..00 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 22..00 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 33..00 UTILITY COORDINATION 44..00 TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY 55..00 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS 66..00 MnDOT STAFF APPROVED GEOMETRIC LAYOUT 77..00 FEASIBILITY REPORT AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN 88..00 FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS 99..00 OPTIONAL TASKS Preliminary and Final Design Humboldt Area Pedestrian Improvements North Humboldt Avenue Full Depth Reclamation, Sidewalk Improvements on 67th Avenue N, and Mill and Overlay on 65th Avenue N In Brooklyn Center, Minnesota City Project 2026-05 The project includes targeted street improvements: • Full-depth pavement replacement on Humboldt Avenue • 2-inch mill and overlay on 65th Avenue and Camden Avenue • Approximately 30% curb replacement • New sidewalk installation on the south side of 67th Avenue • Pedestrian improvements throughout the project area The estimated construction cost for the project is $3,320,000. Funding sources include Special Assessments, Municipal State Aid (MSA), Storm Drainage Utility, Sanitary Sewer Utility, Water Utility, Street Light Utility, and Outside funds from the 2024 Metropolitan Council Regional Solicitation Active Transportation Regional Sales Tax Funding. Currently no Federal Funding. The anticipated project start date is May 2025 and will conclude final design plans in October 2026. Blue text indicates additions or revisions to original City of Brooklyn Center scope. SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 48 of 221 4/1/2025 Page 2 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 11..00 PPRROOJJEECCTT MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT Assumptions: Project Design Duration: 18 months (May 2025-October 2026) Weekly Conf Calls: 1 hour/call Monthly progress reports and schedule updates: 2 hours/month 20 agency meetings, virtual, 2 hours/ meeting, includes prep and minutes for 2 people Client Deliverables: Topographic Survey A topographic survey coded using the City of Brooklyn Center’s standard point descriptions and an AutoCAD 2023 base map depicting all lines and surveyed features will be provided. Geotechnical Report The selected consultant will be provided with a geotechnical report with the following information; • A Cad Sketch showing exploration locations • Pavement summary logs of the pavement cores and material thicknesses • Boring logs describing materials encountered. • Recommendations for pavement section design, utility construction, and estimated infiltration rates. • Logs of the borings describing the materials encountered and presenting the results of groundwater measurements, pavement thicknesses, and laboratory tests. • A summary of the subsurface profile and groundwater conditions. • Consultant to advise on any additional borings to support design. The city will be responsible for obtaining additional borings. Existing Utilities The selected consultant will be provided with the following existing utility information; • Sanitary sewer televising videos and inspection reports. • Storm sewer main televising and inspection reports. • Storm and sanitary manhole condition reports. 1.1 The selected Consultant will coordinate with the designated City Project Manager. The selected Consultant will be expected to make periodic progress reports to and provide information as requested by City staff. --90 ------ 90 $17,640.00 1.2 Agency Meetings (MnDOT Metro, MnDOT CO, State Aid, Coop Agreements, Hennepin County, City, Metro Transit, School, Emergency Services) --40 -20 ---- 60 $10,700.00 1.3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 24 --------24 $6,336.00 SRF Deliverables: Schedule, facilitate, and document project meetings Updated monthly project schedule Monthly invoices QA/QC documentation SSUUBBTTOOTTAALL -- TTAASSKK 11 2244 00 113300 00 2200 00 00 00 00 117744 $$3344,,667766..0000 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 49 of 221 4/1/2025 Page 3 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 22..00 PPUUBBLLIICC IINNVVOOLLVVEEMMEENNTT Assumptions: City coordinates and reserves meeting(s) location. City staff coordinates notices of meetings, website updates and notifications, prepares prints, and mails notices. Client Deliverables: City Staff will complete the Assessment Hearing without the selected Consultant Review and comment of Fact Sheets Mailings/Invitations to Meetings Meeting Location 2.1 The selected Consultant must prepare (3) three fact sheets for presentations.--4 24 ----- 28 $4,504.00 2.2 Meetings will include (1) one neighborhood meeting, (1) one public hearing, and (1) one additional meeting as deemed necessary by City Staff. --16 24 24 ---- 64 $10,288.00 SRF Deliverables: Attend public engagement meetings and provide City staff with meeting materials Prepare meeting minutes and consolidate public comments received SSUUBBTTOOTTAALL -- TTAASSKK 22 00 00 2200 4488 2244 00 00 00 00 9922 $$1144,,779922..0000 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 50 of 221 4/1/2025 Page 4 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 33..00 UUTTIILLIITTYY CCOOOORRDDIINNAATTIIOONN Assumptions: Assumes Steps 1-6, and 9 of the MnDOT Utility Coordination Process with be followed. Major processes include the following: Gopher State One Call Kickoff Meeting Design Meeting Permit Submittal Coordination Utility coordination meetings are virtual, 1 hour meetings with 2 staff members. Assumes no utility easements and no utility agreements are needed. Public utility relocation and design covered under other tasks Utility Plan Sheet Development budget under PRELIMINARY AND FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS Client Deliverables: Attendance at meetings, review meeting minutes 3.1 The selected Consultant must coordinate installation, replacement and/or relocation of private facilities within or adjacent to the project. --4 -12 40 40 -- 96 $12,380.00 SRF Deliverables: Utility layouts and plans provided to utility owners Utility coordination meeting minutes and documentation SSUUBBTTOOTTAALL -- TTAASSKK 33 00 00 44 00 1122 4400 4400 00 00 9966 $$1122,,338800..0000 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 51 of 221 4/1/2025 Page 5 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 44..00 TTOOPPOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL SSUURRVVEEYY Assumptions: City to incorporate additional survey into existing topography design file. Client Deliverables: A topographic survey coded using the City of Brooklyn Center's standard point descriptions and an AutoCAD 2023 base map depicting all lines and surveyed features will be provided. 4.1 The selected Consultant must perform a review of the City provided survey, and provide requests for additional survey. City to coordinate additional survey needs. --4 -4 ----8 $1,356.00 SRF Deliverables: Survey Request SSUUBBTTOOTTAALL -- TTAASSKK 44 00 00 44 00 44 00 00 00 00 88 $$11,,335566..0000 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 52 of 221 4/1/2025 Page 6 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 55..00 RRIIGGHHTT--OOFF--WWAAYY AANNDD EEAASSEEMMEENNTTSS Assumptions: Assume no Right of Way and Easement work needed on City property (Park, Police Station, and Fire Station) Assume Minimum Damage Acquisition (MDA) Forms (No Appraisals) Assume no federal funds, therefore no R/W Certificate No. 1 or a R/W Certificate No. 1-A needed. Title documentation will be obtained from a title company as an expense (cost summarized under: Direct Non-Salary Expenses) Assumes no impacts to parking, driveways or accesses Assumes 5 parcels with permanent and temporary easements only Consents to easement will be obtained on the 5 PE parcels (lender fees are estimates only) Additional right of way and easement work for potential temporary easements is included in the Optional Tasks Client Deliverables: Sample Conveyance documents, timely review of submissions and approvals Approval of MDA's Payments to owners Recording 5.1 Prepare Legal Descriptions and Parcel Exhibits (5 of each)--5 -15 ----20 $3,125.00 5.2 Minimum Damage Acquisition (MDA) Reports- 5 reports 2 6 --25 ----33 $5,213.00 5.3 Title review -2 -------2 $370.00 5.4 Acquisition Process (Field Title, Document Preparation, Offers, Negotiation, Settlements) 2 2 -30 30 ---5 69 $10,528.00 SRF Deliverables: Exhibits, legal descriptions, negotiations, document preparations, titles, MDA Reports SSUUBBTTOOTTAALL -- TTAASSKK 55 44 1100 55 3300 7700 00 00 00 55 112244 $$1199,,223366..0000 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 53 of 221 4/1/2025 Page 7 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 66..00 MMnnDDOOTT SSTTAAFFFF AAPPPPRROOVVEEDD GGEEOOMMEETTRRIICC LLAAYYOOUUTT Assumptions: MnDOT Level 2 Geometric Layout with 1 round of revisions (2 submittals). Design meeting with MnDOT staff is included in Project Management task. Assumes intersection lanes will shift and/or change requiring a Signal Justification Report (SJR) Client Deliverables: Review and comment of Geometric Layout 6.1 Develop and prepare a Level 2 Geometric Layout and Design Memo (as determined by MnDOT) with the appropriate design standards form for the intersection of Highway 100/Humboldt/65th only and obtain MnDOT and City staff approval. --4 -16 20 20 8 - 68 $8,812.00 6.2 Develop a SJR for the intersection of Highway 100/Humboldt/65th (ADDED TASK) 6.2.1 Data Collection/Processing Data -----10 ---10 $1,300.00 6.2.2 Signal Justification Report (SJR)--6 --24 ---30 $4,296.00 SRF Deliverables: Level 2 Geometric Layout and Design Memorandum for Highway 100/Humboldt Ave/65th Ave intersection SSUUBBTTOOTTAALL -- TTAASSKK 66 00 00 1100 00 1166 5544 2200 88 00 110088 $$1144,,440088..0000 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 54 of 221 4/1/2025 Page 8 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 77..00 FFEEAASSIIBBIILLIITTYY RREEPPOORRTT AANNDD PPRREELLIIMMIINNAARRYY DDEESSIIGGNN Assumptions: The feasibility report will be a 10 to 15-page public-facing memo. The purpose is to outline the existing conditions and provide justification for the recommended design and project scope. The report should be geared toward ensuring the City Council and residents understand why the project is being recommended. The feasibility report should include: • Summary of existing conditions • Pavement design recommendation • Utility replacement recommendation and justification STREET IMPROVEMENTS Humboldt Avenue and 65th Avenue are designated Municipal State Aid (MSA) Routes. The roadways in the project area were last improved in 1999, 2006, 2007, and 2018. • Humboldt Avenue width: 50 to 70 feet • 65th Avenue width: 40 to 66 feet • Camden Avenue width: 40 feet The project includes targeted street improvements: • Full-depth pavement replacement on Humboldt Avenue • 2-inch mill and overlay on 65th Avenue and Camden Avenue • Approximately 30% curb replacement • New sidewalk installation on the south side of 67th Avenue • Pedestrian improvements throughout the project area (per SRF Concept Layout) WATER MAIN Approximately 40 percent of the water main in the project area is 6-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP) installed in 2006. The remaining system consists of 6-inch and 8- inch cast iron pipe (CIP) installed between 1960 and 1968. • Historical records show seven water main breaks on the CIP water main (project is anticipated to include watermain replacement) • One property has experienced a frozen service • The project includes insulating the frozen service and making casting SANITARY SEWER Approximately 53 percent of the sanitary sewer system is PVC or has a cured-in- place pipe (CIPP) lining, installed in 1968 and 2006. The remaining system consists of 8-inch and 10-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) installed in 1960, 1965, and 1968. • No history of root intrusion • The project includes lining the existing VCP and replacing manhole castings (assume no sanitary manhole rehabilitation required) STORM SEWER The storm sewer system directs flow to trunk lines on 65th Avenue and 69th Avenue. The system consists of 15-inch high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and 15- inch to 66-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). • 33 percent of the storm sewer was installed between 1999 and 2006 • The remaining system was installed between 1960 and 1973 • The project includes casting replacement SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 55 of 221 4/1/2025 Page 9 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE STREET LIGHTING The existing street lighting system consists of a mix of overhead and underground power, with wood and fiberglass poles and cobra head LED light fixtures. • The project includes replacing one wood pole with one fiberglass pole, with a cut-off type LED light fixture and underground power Client Deliverables: The city will provide all work related to assessments (assessment roll, maps, etc.). The city will provide existing public utility GIS data. 7.1 Site walk to determine curb, pavement and utility conditions --6 -6 ----12 $2,034.00 7.2 Review provided geoetech and utility information --8 -8 ----16 $2,712.00 7.3 Provide recommendations for public utility replacements. a. Sanitary main replacement and or lining feasibility and recommendations. b. Water main replacement recommendations. --8 -16 ---- 24 $3,856.00 7.4 The project layout will be further developed based on the concept layout already prepared as part of preliminary design and must incorporate expected and developed revisions based on work as part of project. --8 -16 20 24 -- 68 $9,264.00 7.5 A project construction cost estimate update will be included as part of this preliminary work that will be used for final funding participation determination. --8 --8 8 -- 24 $3,544.00 7.6 Draft and Final Feasibility Report --16 -24 ----40 $6,568.00 SRF Deliverables: Draft and final preliminary layout Preliminary cost estimate Feasibility Report SSUUBBTTOOTTAALL -- TTAASSKK 77 00 00 5544 00 7700 2288 3322 00 00 118844 $$2277,,997788..0000 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 56 of 221 4/1/2025 Page 10 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 88..00 FFIINNAALL CCOONNSSTTRRUUCCTTIIOONN PPLLAANNSS Assumptions: The selected Consultant shall provide preliminary and final construction plans for the project and follow the guidelines and standards for a MnDOT Cooperative Agreement Projects which will be reviewed both by Metro State Aid functional groups and also MnDOT Central Office. The selected Consultant will be expected to respond to MnDOT, Hennepin County, City and Metro Transit comments as part of the plan review and approval process. Project footprint and sheet layout based on SRF Concept Layout, dated 03/07/2025. Milestone Plan Submittals : 60%, 90%, and 100% Plans Client Deliverables: Review and comment on Milestone submittals Permit application fees 8.1 Plan Preparation. a. Title sheet and general layout b. Statement of Estimated Quantities c. Soils / construction notes d. Standard plates e. Tabulations f. Typical sections and Pavement Design g. Miscellaneous Details h. Standard Plan sheets i. Detour Plan sheets j. Construction Staging and Traffic Control Plans - Analyze two (2) staging alternatives, evaluating construction duration and project cost impact k. Alignment plans and tabulations l. In place Topo, Utility m. Removal plans n. Construction plans and profiles o. Intersection details p. ADA pedestrian ramp details s. Erosion Control Plans (Includes Temporary Erosion/Sediment Control) t. Turf establishment plans v. Signing and Striping plans w. Cross section sheets x. Lighting Plans (ADDED TASK) y. Signal Plans (ADDED TASK) --80 -180 360 200 80 - 900 $119,620.00 8.2 Storm sewer design must meet the City’s Minimum Engineering Standards for Stormwater Conveyance q. Drainage plans, profiles and tabulation sheets r. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ---16 -40 -10 - 66 $8,680.00 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 57 of 221 4/1/2025 Page 11 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 8.3 Stormwater Management Report including: a. Calculations for watershed and ordinance compliance, treatment volume for the project, treatment planned per facility and for the total project, water quality, and rate control calculations for the total project. Compliance will be approved by the city, presentation at a watershed commission meeting is not anticipated. b. Include annual pollutant removal for TP and TSS (from MIDS or other approved WQ model) c. Narrative to support the plan to meet the requirements and to document the findings of the above tasks. d. Demonstrate adherence to the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission and MPCA requirements. ---20 -40 --- 60 $8,300.00 8.4 Permits: Permitting associated with the improvements will be produced and coordinated by the consultant. 8.4.1 Shingle Creek Watershed Permit ---10 -20 ---30 $4,150.00 8.4.2 Provide a fully executed Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) “Notice of Termination” document for the Construction Stormwater permit for the project file. ---10 ----- 10 $1,550.00 8.5 Public Utility Design u. Sanitary and water main plans, profiles and tabulations. --8 -24 24 --- 56 $8,120.00 8.6 Prepare final construction cost estimate broken down by funding sources.--4 -8 16 ---28 $4,008.00 8.7 Project Manual --4 -32 ---- 36 $5,360.00 8.8 Bid Management (Prepare & Submit Ad for Bids, Distribute Plans & Specs, Maintain Planholders list, Respond to Bidder Questions, Prepare & Issue Addenda, Bid Opening, Bid Tab, Prepare Award Recommendation Letter) --8 -16 16 --- 40 $5,936.00 8.9 AutoCAD preferred design software. MicroStation is acceptable with full conversion at end of project to AutoCAD. All design and sheet files in AutoCAD are part of the project deliverables. -------16 - 16 $1,600.00 SRF Deliverables: Staging Layouts Approved bid package for construction letting 60, 90, and 100 percent cost estimates and plans Cost-sharing estimate Final certified plans and specifications Design data Stormwater Management Report Permits Applications SSUUBBTTOOTTAALL -- TTAASSKK 88 00 00 110044 5566 226600 551166 220000 110066 00 11,,224422 $$116677,,332244..0000 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 58 of 221 4/1/2025 Page 12 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE TTOOTTAALL EESSTTIIMMAATTEEDD PPEERRSSOONN--HHOOUURRSS 2288 1100 333311 113344 447766 663388 229922 111144 55 22,,002288 AVERAGE HOURLY BILLING RATE $264.00 $185.00 $196.00 $155.00 $143.00 $130.00 $117.00 $100.00 $138.00 ESTIMATED LABOR AND OVERHEAD $7,392.00 $1,850.00 $64,876.00 $20,770.00 $68,068.00 $82,940.00 $34,164.00 $11,400.00 $690.00 $292,150.00 SRF ESTIMATED DIRECT NON-SALARY EXPENSES $4,650.00 $296,800.00 TTOOTTAALL EESSTTIIMMAATTEEDD FFEEEE ((wwiitthhoouutt OOppttiioonnaall TTaasskkss))$$229966,,880000..0000 TTOOTTAALL EESSTTIIMMAATTEEDD FFEEEE ((wwiitthh OOppttiioonnaall TTaasskkss))$$666622,,557722..0000 SRF ESTIMATE OF DIRECT NON-SALARY EXPENSES: MILEAGE:Personal Vehicles 2000 Miles @ $0.700 $1,400.00 Title Reports 5 Reports @ $250.00 ea $1,250.00 Lender Fees 5 Fees @ $400.00 ea $2,000.00 SSRRFF EEXXPPEENNSSEESS::$$44,,665500..0000 SUBTOTAL: (SRF Labor and Expenses) SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 59 of 221 4/1/2025 Page 13 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 99..00 OOPPTTIIOONNAALL TTAASSKKSS Assumptions: Each task to be started at the direction of the City. Client Deliverables: Review and comments 9.1 RRoouunnddaabboouutt JJuussttiiffiiccaattiioonn RReeppoorrtt - this task will be necessary if the City elects to construct a roundabout per MnDOT State Aid requirements. Task hours includes time for traffic counts, review of crash data, perform operational analysis, and report approval. *cost per intersection evaluation --6 --34 --- 40 $5,596.00 SRF Deliverables: Roundabout Justification Report 9.2 RRoouunnddaabboouutt DDeessiiggnn - optional task to provide roundabout design in place of the traditional intersection as shown on the preliminary layout. Task hours include extended roadway (preliminary and final) design, drainage, and lighting design for roundabout inclusion into final plans. *incremental cost per roundabout --20 40 -40 40 20 - 160 $22,000.00 9.3 DDrraafftt OOppeerraattiioonnss && MMaaiinntteennaannccee GGuuiiddaannccee ffoorr ssttoorrmmwwaatteerr ttrreeaattmmeenntt iinnffrraassttrruuccttuurree ---16 ----- 16 $2,480.00 SRF Deliverables: Design Memo 9.4 PPhhaassee II aanndd PPhhaassee IIII EESSAA - this task could be performed by Braun Intertec. Cost for their work is included as an expense below. Hours associated with this task is SRF coordination and quality review only. --4------4$784.00 9.4.1 BBrraauunn IInntteerrtteecc SSeerrvviicceess -- sseeee aappppeennddiixx ffoorr mmoorree iinnffoorrmmaattiioonn $53,273.00 9.5 CCoonnssttrruuccttiioonn AAddmmiinniissttrraattiioonn aanndd IInnssppeeccttiioonn $231,000.00 Assumptions: Construction services are included as an optional task. Estimate based on project layout and preliminary design. Review of cost and construction scope should be reviewed once final design is complete and construction schedule has been determined. SRF to provide full construction administration and inspection per MnDOT State- Aid and City requirements. This is to include oversight of construction, measure and record pay items, review traffic contractor measures, monthly labor compliance interviews, review temporary and permanent erosion control measures, and ensure construction practices and materials used are compliant with project specifications. Construction survey, testing, and plant inspection to be completed by Others. Fee and budget based on an approx. 7.0% of assumed $3.3M in construction cost. 9.6 RRiigghhtt ooff WWaayy ((TTeemmppoorraarryy EEaasseemmeennttss OOnnllyy)) - our preliminary and final design will make efforts to minimize impacts to properties however given the placement of new and reconstructed sidewalk there is a potential to impact up to 17 properties. Assumptions: SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 60 of 221 4/1/2025 Page 14 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE Assume Minimum Damage Acquisition (MDA) Forms (No Appraisals) Assumes no impacts to parking , driveways or accesses 9.6.1 Legal Descriptions and Parcel Exhibits (17 of each)--17 -34 ----51 $8,194.00 9.6.2 Minimum Damage Acquisition (MDA) Reports- 17 reports 20 20 --51 ----91 $16,273.00 9.6.3 Acquisition Process (Field Title, Document Preperation, Offers, Negotiation, Settlements) 3 10 -60 60 --14 - 147 $21,922.00 SRF ESTIMATE OF DIRECT NON-SALARY EXPENSES: Title Reports 17 Reports @ $250.00 ea $4,250.00 SRF Deliverables: Exhibits, legal descriptions, negotiations, document preparations, titles, MDA Reports SSUUBBTTOOTTAALL -- TTAASSKK 99 2233 3300 4477 111166 114455 7744 4400 3344 00 550099 $$336655,,777722..0000 OOPPTTIIOONNAALL TTAASSKKSS TTOOTTAALL ((SSRRFF wwiitthh SSuubbccoonnssuullttaannttss))$$336655,,777722..0000 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 61 of 221 4/1/2025 Page 15 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE SUMMARY OF COSTS:PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 6,336.00$ -$ 25,480.00$ -$ 2,860.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $34,676.00 2 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT -$ -$ 3,920.00$ 7,440.00$ 3,432.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $14,792.00 3 UTILITY COORDINATION -$ -$ 784.00$ -$ 1,716.00$ 5,200.00$ 4,680.00$ -$ -$ $12,380.00 4 TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY -$ -$ 784.00$ -$ 572.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $1,356.00 5 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS 1,056.00$ 1,850.00$ 980.00$ 4,650.00$ 10,010.00$ -$ -$ -$ 690.00$ $19,236.00 6 MnDOT STAFF APPROVED GEOMETRIC LAYOUT -$ -$ 1,960.00$ -$ 2,288.00$ 7,020.00$ 2,340.00$ 800.00$ -$ $14,408.00 7 FEASIBILITY REPORT AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN -$ -$ 10,584.00$ -$ 10,010.00$ 3,640.00$ 3,744.00$ -$ -$ $27,978.00 8 FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS -$ -$ 20,384.00$ 8,680.00$ 37,180.00$ 67,080.00$ 23,400.00$ 10,600.00$ -$ $167,324.00 TTOOTTAALLSS $$77,,339922..0000 $$11,,885500..0000 $$6644,,887766..0000 $$2200,,777700..0000 $$6688,,006688..0000 $$8822,,994400..0000 $$3344,,116644..0000 $$1111,,440000..0000 $$669900..0000 $$229922,,115500..0000 9 OPTIONAL TASKS 6,072.00$ 5,550.00$ 9,212.00$ 17,980.00$ 20,735.00$ 9,620.00$ 4,680.00$ 3,400.00$ -$ $308,249.00 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 62 of 221 4/1/2025 Page 16 of 16 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Brooklyn Center Project: Preliminary and Final Design of Pedestrian and Roadway Subconsultants:Braun Intertec 19063.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE SUMMARY OF HOURS:PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH.SUPPORT TOTALS 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 24 -130 -20 ----174 2 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT --20 48 24 ----92 3 UTILITY COORDINATION --4 -12 40 40 --96 4 TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY --4 -4 ----8 5 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS 4 10 5 30 70 ---5 124 6 MnDOT STAFF APPROVED GEOMETRIC LAYOUT --10 -16 54 20 8 -108 7 FEASIBILITY REPORT AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN --54 -70 28 32 --184 8 FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS --104 56 260 516 200 106 -1,242 TTOOTTAALLSS 2288 1100 333311 113344 447766 663388 229922 111144 55 22,,002288 9 OPTIONAL TASKS 23 30 47 116 145 74 40 34 -509 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brooklyn Center Humboldt_ScopeOfWorkTemplateBasic.xlsx MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 63 of 221 AA/EOE Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com April 1, 2025 Proposal QTB213242 Amber Ortlepp, PE SRF Consulting Group, Inc. 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Re: Proposal for Environmental Services North Humboldt Avenue Full Depth Reclamation, Sidewalk Improvements on 67th Avenue North, and Mill and Overlay on 65th Avenue North Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Dear Ms. Ortlepp: Braun Intertec Corporation appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal to complete environmental services for the North Humboldt Avenue Full Depth Reclamation, Sidewalk Improvements on 67th Avenue North, and Mill and Overlay on 65th Avenue North project. Project Information Per the City of Brooklyn Center (City) RFP provided by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. (SRF), we understand the proposed project will include full depth reclamation and reconstruction on North Humboldt Avenue between 65th Avenue North and 69th Avenue North, installation of a sidewalk on 67th Avenue North between North Humboldt Avenue and Dupont Avenue North, mill and overlay on 65th Avenue North between North Humboldt Avenue and Camden Avenue North, pedestrian safety enhancements throughout the project corridor, and utility improvements throughout the project corridor. Purpose It is our understanding the project is currently in the design phase and the City may elect to complete optional environmental services including a Modified Corridor Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and a Phase II ESA. The purpose of a Modified Corridor Phase I ESA is to serve as a cost-effective environmental screening tool to identify, to the extent possible, existing sources of contamination (based on present or former uses) at locations that could impact project construction. A Modified Corridor Phase I ESA is also a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requirement for obtaining liability assurance (i.e., No Association Determinations) in advance of acquisition of contaminated properties if sought by project partners. The purpose of a Phase II ESA is to characterize soil and/or groundwater contamination that may be present along the Corridor and to define its horizontal and vertical extents. Data collected during the investigation will be used to aid in the project design, including material management planning, as well as in determining the need for requesting liability assurances for potential acquisition or easement parcels. APPENDIX B - BRAUN INTERTEC DETAILED COST BREAKDOWN Page 64 of 221 SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Proposal QTB213242 April 1, 2025 Page 2 Scope of Services We propose the following tasks to help achieve the stated purpose. If we encounter unfavorable or unforeseen conditions during the completion of our tasks that lead us to recommend an expanded scope of services, we will contact you to discuss the conditions before resuming our services. Modified Corridor Phase I ESA The primary approach used to identify environmental risks will be the timely completion of a corridor assessment using protocols established by Minnesota Department of Transportation’s (MnDOT) Office of Environmental Stewardship (OES). This approach will be completed using a modified version of the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) methodology E 1527 -21, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessment: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. The approach is modified from ASTM standards as the Limited Phase I ESA will be conducted along a linear corridor, limited to a 300-foot buffer (based on the urban setting) from the centerline of the proposed alignments, and does not meet all the requirements of ASTM Standard E1527-21 nor All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI). The approach is accepted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for contaminant management planning and property evaluation when seeking liability assurances. All properties in the 300-foot buffer from edge of pavement/shoulder will be reviewed and ranked as having a high, medium, or low potential for contamination based on criteria established by MnDOT OES. Rankings will be presented on summary tables, figures, and within the text of the report. Braun Intertec will prepare a Site Data Summary sheet for each site exhibiting a high or medium potential for contamination along the Project corridor and will document how and why the site is given this ranking/classification. These rankings will be based solely on the sites’ potential for contamination and not on the sites’ locations with respect to proposed construction limits. Site rankings may be adjusted based on evidence collected and professional judgement. As described in the ASTM Standard for the Phase I ESA process, Braun Intertec’s assessment will include review of a regulatory database report, historical documents, completion of interviews where warranted, and a site reconnaissance. Braun Intertec’s research will include but not be limited to MPCA and Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) files, fire insurance maps, city and county files, Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) files and/or Minnesota Well Index (MWI) files, historical maps, and aerial photographs. Findings will be included in the Modified Phase I ESA report. Schedule We anticipate the draft Modified Phase I ESA report will be completed within 10 weeks from the date of written authorization and confirmation of study area. This is based on current turnaround of MPCA file requests. We will only submit an electronic copy of our report to you unless you request otherwise. At your request, we can also send the report to additional project team members. Page 65 of 221 SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Proposal QTB213242 April 1, 2025 Page 3 Phase II ESA Drilling Investigation A Phase II work plan and Phase II ESA drilling and sampling activities will be dependent on results of the Modified Corridor Phase I ESA and available project plans. For the purposes of this proposal, we have included costs to conduct up to 8 soil borings, each to a depth of 20 feet using direct push (Geoprobe®) methods. Braun Intertec has assumed the collection of up to 16 soil samples and 4 groundwater samples. The Phase II Work Plan will be provided to the Project team for review and approval prior to initiating the drilling activities. Staking In preparation for the Phase II Drilling Investigation fieldwork, we will stake prospective subsurface exploration locations and obtain surface elevations at those locations using GPS technology. For purposes of linking the GPS data to an appropriate reference, we request that you provide CAD files indicating location/elevation references appropriate for this project. Utility Clearance Prior to drilling, we will contact Gopher State One Call and arrange for notification to the appropriate utility vendors to mark and clear the exploration locations of public underground utilities. Braun Intertec has not included fees in the Scope of Services for a private utility locating subcontractor to assist in locating private utilities. Depending on access requirements, ground conditions or potential utility conflicts, our field crew may alter the exploration locations from those proposed to facilitate accessibility. Permits We will obtain the necessary right-of-way permit with the City prior to beginning our fieldwork. We assume the City will waive the associated permit fees as we will be completing the work for them. If soil borings are needed outside of the public right-of-way, we assume you or the City will be responsible for obtaining written permission from all affected property owners for the proposed exploration locations. If any of our assumptions above are incorrect, we will need to be contacted as we will need to revise our scope and fee accordingly. Traffic Control The borings will likely extend into the drive lanes of the Corridor roadways with potentially limited shoulders. Protection of our field crews will require traffic control signs that will alert motorists to our work within the roadway. We are including fees for a subcontractor to provide traffic control services for the roadway borings. Soil Screening During boring activities, subsurface materials encountered at the borings will be monitored by an environmental field professional. Soils will be classified in field and soil discoloration and odors also will be documented, if detected. In addition, soil samples will be screened for the presence of organic vapors with a photoionization detector (PID) using the headspace method of analysis recommended by the MPCA. Page 66 of 221 SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Proposal QTB213242 April 1, 2025 Page 4 Soil Sampling and Analytical Testing Selected soil samples will be collected and chemically analyzed to determine the presence of impacts. Soil samples will be collected from depth intervals in the unsaturated zone where indications of contamination are observed in the field. If no indications of contamination are observed, the soil samples will be collected from depths most likely to be impacted based on the potential contaminant source or depths likely to be constructed. For the purposes of this proposal, we assume that a maximum of 16 soil samples (two per boring) will be collected and analyzed the following parameters: ▪ Volatile organic compounds VOCs using United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8260 ▪ Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) using EPA Method 8270 ▪ Diesel range organics (DRO) using the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Method ▪ Gasoline range organics (GRO) using the WDNR Method ▪ The 8 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals using EPA Methods 6020 and 7471 Groundwater Sampling and Analytical Testing Temporary monitoring wells will be installed to evaluate groundwater conditions at select locations. The temporary monitoring wells will be installed in up to 4 of the soil borings. Prior to sampling the temporary monitoring wells, static groundwater levels in each monitoring well will be measured to the nearest 0.01 foot and recorded. The groundwater samples will be collected according to Braun Intertec SOPs and following MPCA sampling guidance. Groundwater samples will be placed directly into laboratory-supplied containers, preserved appropriately, and submitted to the laboratory for chemical analysis. The budget for this task assumes that a total of 4 groundwater samples will be collected from the temporary monitoring wells and submitted to the laboratory for analysis of a combination of the following parameters: ▪ VOCs using EPA Method 8260 ▪ PAHs using EPA Method 8270 ▪ DRO using the WDNR Method ▪ GRO using the WDNR Method ▪ Dissolved eight RCRA metals using EPA Methods 6020 and 7470 Page 67 of 221 SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Proposal QTB213242 April 1, 2025 Page 5 Since our planned exploration will include the collection of groundwater, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will require that we complete notifications and well sealing records. Therefore, we have included fees required to complete the notifications and well sealing record requirements. The results of the investigation will be presented within a Phase II ESA report. The report will also include implications related to the design/construction of the project. The report will be presented to the project team for review and comment prior to finalization. We will only submit an electronic copy of our report to you unless you request otherwise. At your request, we can also send the report to additional project team members. Schedule We anticipate performing our Phase II ESA work according to the following schedule: ▪ Phase II ESA Work Plan – within about 10 weeks following receipt of written authorization to allow preparation of the Modified Phase I and review of available plans. ▪ Drill rig mobilization – within about 4 weeks following approval of the Limited Phase II Drilling Investigation work plan. ▪ Field exploration – 2 days on site to complete the work. ▪ Laboratory analysis – within 3 weeks after completion of field exploration. ▪ Report submittal – within about 3 weeks after completion of laboratory testing. If we cannot complete our proposed scope of services according to this schedule due to circumstances beyond our control, we may need to revise this proposal prior to completing the remaining tasks. Fees We will furnish the services described in this proposal on a time and materials basis for the estimated fee of $53,273. We are attaching a tabulation showing hourly and/or unit rates associated with our proposed scope of services. Our work may extend over several invoicing periods. As such, we will submit partial progress invoices for work we perform during each invoicing period. General Remarks We will be happy to meet with you to discuss our proposed scope of services further and clarify the various scope components. We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal to you. Please sign and return a copy to us in its entirety. Page 68 of 221 SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Proposal QTB213242 April 1, 2025 Page 6 We based the proposed fee on the scope of services described and the assumptions that you will authorize our services within 30 days and that others will not delay us beyond our proposed schedule. This proposal was prepared under the understanding an Environmental Subconsultant Agreement will be prepared by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. This agreement will outline the terms and conditions of our services. To have questions answered or schedule a time to meet and discuss our approach to this project further, please contact Joe Foline at 612.360.5849 (jfoline@braunintertec.com or Mary Canino at 612.599.5234 (mcanino@braunintertec.com). Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Joseph M. Foline, CHMM Mary A. Canino, PG, CHMM Senior Manager, Senior Scientist Vice President, Principal Scientist Attachments: Project Proposal – QTB213242 MDH Notification Form The proposal is accepted, and you are authorized to proceed. Authorizer’s Firm Authorizer’s Signature Authorizer’s Name (please print or type) Authorizer’s Title Date Page 69 of 221 Client:Service Description:Work Site Address: 3701 Wayzata Boulevard Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55416 SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Michael Turner 3701 Wayzata Boulevard Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55416 (763)475-0010 Modified Corridor Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Phase II ESA Description Quantity Units Unit Price Extension Phase 1 Project Management Activity 1.1 Meetings, Scheduling, Updates, & Invoicing $2,816.00 125 Project Control Specialist 4.00 Hour 144.00 $576.00 396 Senior Consultant II 8.00 Hour 220.00 $1,760.00 397 Principal Consultant I 2.00 Hour 240.00 $480.00 Phase 1 Total:$2,816.00 Phase 2 Modified Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Activity 2.1 Modified Phase I ESA Research $13,230.00 390 Staff Consultant III 8.00 Hour 135.00 $1,080.00 391 Project Consultant I 30.00 Hour 145.00 $4,350.00 396 Senior Consultant II 30.00 Hour 220.00 $6,600.00 SUB Subcontractor 1.00 Each 1,150.00 $1,150.00 1868 ENV Trip Charge 1.00 Each 50.00 $50.00 Activity 2.2 Modified Phase I ESA Report $5,000.00 397 Principal Consultant I 2.00 Hour 240.00 $480.00 396 Senior Consultant II 4.00 Hour 220.00 $880.00 391 Project Consultant I 20.00 Hour 145.00 $2,900.00 371 GIS/CAD Specialist II 4.00 Hour 136.00 $544.00 138 Project Assistant 2.00 Hour 98.00 $196.00 Phase 2 Total:$18,230.00 Phase 3 Phase II ESA Activity 3.1 Phase II ESA Work Plan $1,644.00 397 Principal Consultant I 1.00 Hour 240.00 $240.00 396 Senior Consultant II 4.00 Hour 220.00 $880.00 391 Project Consultant I 2.00 Hour 145.00 $290.00 371 GIS/CAD Specialist II 1.00 Hour 136.00 $136.00 138 Project Assistant 1.00 Hour 98.00 $98.00 Activity 3.2 Drilling Services $13,397.00 205 Site layout and utility clearance 4.00 Hour 114.00 $456.00 1862 Utility Trip Charge 1.00 Each 50.00 $50.00 371 CADD/Graphics Operator 1.00 Hour 136.00 $136.00 5902 Trimble Catalyst GPS, Submeter, per day 0.50 Each 134.00 $67.00 288 Project Assistant 2.00 Hour 98.00 $196.00 9902 Sealing records, each 4.00 Each 250.00 $1,000.00 9954 Steam cleaning of drill rig and tool, per steam 1.00 Each 350.00 $350.00 Page 1 of 204/01/2025 09:06 AM Project Proposal QTB213242 N Humboldt Ave Full Depth Reclamation, Sidewalk Improvements Page 70 of 221 Proposal Total:$53,273.00 1087 Mobilization 1.00 Each 300.00 $300.00 9400 GeoProbe Services, per hour 16.00 Each 420.00 $6,720.00 9405 GeoProbe consumables, DT325, per 5 feet 12.00 Each 6.00 $72.00 9704 Piezometer or well casing - 1" PVC, per foot 60.00 Each 8.00 $480.00 9714 Well Screen - 1" PVC, per foot 20.00 Each 19.00 $380.00 9730 Grout with bentonite, materials per foot 160.00 Each 5.00 $800.00 3001 Peristaltic Pump per day 2.00 Each 45.00 $90.00 SUB1 Subcontracted Traffic Control 1.00 Each 2,300.00 $2,300.00 Activity 3.3 Sample Collection & Field Analysis $3,616.00 390 Staff Consultant III 20.00 Hour 135.00 $2,700.00 1868 ENV Trip Charge 2.00 Each 50.00 $100.00 5036 PID w/10.6 eV lamp, per day 2.00 Each 125.00 $250.00 5084 Water Level Meter, per day 2.00 Each 45.00 $90.00 6912 Water sampling tubing & consumables, per foot 4.00 Each 7.00 $28.00 5027 Field filtering water, per sample 4.00 Each 45.00 $180.00 5902 Trimble Catalyst GPS, Submeter, per day 2.00 Each 134.00 $268.00 Activity 3.4 Laboratory Analysis $8,270.00 SUB2 Subcontracted Laboratory Cost 1.00 Each 8,270.00 $8,270.00 Activity 3.5 Phase II ESA Report $5,300.00 391 Project Consultant I 16.00 Hour 145.00 $2,320.00 396 Senior Consultant II 8.00 Hour 220.00 $1,760.00 397 Principal Consultant I 2.00 Hour 240.00 $480.00 371 GIS/CAD Specialist II 4.00 Hour 136.00 $544.00 138 Project Assistant 2.00 Hour 98.00 $196.00 Phase 3 Total:$32,227.00 Page 2 of 204/01/2025 09:06 AM Project Proposal QTB213242 N Humboldt Ave Full Depth Reclamation, Sidewalk Improvements Page 71 of 221 AA/EOE Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com April 1, 2025 Proposal QTB213242 Amber Ortlepp, PE SRF Consulting Group, Inc. 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Re: Minnesota Department of Health Well Sealing Notification Form North Humboldt Avenue Full Depth Reclamation, Sidewalk Improvements on 67th Avenue North, and Mill and Overlay on 65th Avenue North Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Dear Ms. Ortlepp: Please have the property owner, representative or agent complete the “Well Owner” section only of the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Well Sealing Notification form below and return it to Braun Intertec along with the signed proposal. We will complete the remainder of the form and submit it to the MDH. NOTE: This form must be completed and returned to Braun Intertec prior to us scheduling the mobilization of our equipment and crews to the project site. Page 72 of 221 APPENDIX C - CONTRACT EXCEPTIONS If SRF is the successful proposer, we respectfully request the ability to negotiate the following provisions from the Brooklyn Center Professional Services Agreement to ensure both SRF and the client are protected: 8. Services Products and Ownership of Documents. Upon full payment to Consultant, all deliverables and products of the Services including, but certainly not limited to, complete and incomplete records, materials, information, reports, recommendations, drawings, plans, and specifications prepared and developed in connection with the provision of the Services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of the City, but the Consultant may retain copies of such materials and may reuse standard portions of such materials in the normal course of its business. Consultant shall have no liability for errors and omissions in draft or otherwise unfinished products or deliverables. The City agrees and understands that if any deliverable or products are reused for anything other than its intended purpose, such use is solely at the City’s risk and the City shall indemnify and hold Consultant harmless of any claims or damages arising out of that unintended use. SRF does not warrant the contents of the deliverables or products. 18. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. In providing the Services hereunder, the Consultant must exercise due professional care to abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provision of the Services to be provided. Any violation will constitute a material breach of this Agreement and entitle the City to immediately terminate this Agreement. 21. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Consultant, and the Consultant’s successors or assigns, agree to protect, defend, save, and hold harmless the City, its officials, agents, and employees from all claims, suits, or actions of any kind, nature, or character, and the costs, disbursements, and expenses of defending the same including, but not limited to, attorneys’ fees, professional services, and other technical, administrative, or professional assistance (collectively “Damages”) to the extent the Damages result from or arise out of the negligence, breach of contract, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its subcontractors, agents, or employees related to or arising out of the performance of, or failure to perform, the Services under this Agreement. There shall be no limitation on the Consultant’s liability, except that Consultant shall not be liable for Damages resulting from or arising out of the negligence, breach of contract, or willful misconduct of the City or its officials, agents or employees. Nothing herein shall be construed as a limitation on or waiver of any immunities or limitations on liability available to the City under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466, or other law. 22. Insurance. During the entire term of this Agreement, the Consultant must maintain workers’ compensation insurance (to the extent required by law) and commercial general liability insurance with a per occurrence limit of no less than $1,500,000 and $2,000,000 aggregate, for both personal injury and property damage. The commercial general liability policy shall name the City as an additional insured for the Services provided under this Agreement and shall provide, as between the City and the Consultant, that the Consultant’s coverage shall be the primary coverage in the event of a loss. If the Consultant is providing either architectural or engineering services, the Consultant must also maintain during the term of this Agreement a professional liability insurance policy with the same limits as for commercial general liability. A certificate of insurance on the City’s approved form which verifies the existence of these insurance coverages must be provided to the City before work under this Agreement is commenced. Page 73 of 221 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 5/5/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Lydia Ener, Assistant City Engineer THROUGH: Elizabeth Heyman, Director of Public Works BY: Lydia Ener, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Declaring April 25, 2025, to be Arbor Day and May 2025 to be Arbor Month in Brooklyn Center Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve a resolution declaring April 25, 2025, to be Arbor Day and May 2025 to be Arbor Month in Brooklyn Center. Background: Arbor Day originated in 1872 in America as a national holiday in which individuals and groups are encouraged to plant and care for trees. Each year, Brooklyn Center typically celebrates National Arbor Day and Arbor Month by hosting local volunteer/educational events with students from an elementary school and other groups within the City. This year, as part of the Arbor Month celebrations, the City Forester and Public Works staff will be planting trees at the East Fire Station with twenty-two children from a local daycare. During the event, the children will be shown the proper way to plant and care for trees, the effects of pests such as emerald ash borer, and the importance of planting diverse tree species to maintain our urban canopy. This event and resolution support the City’s Forestry Program that has resulted in Brooklyn Center receiving its thirty-third consecutive national Tree City USA award by the National Arbor Day Foundation. Budget Issues: NA Inclusive Community Engagement: NA Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: NA Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Arbor Day and Month Resolution Page 74 of 221 Page 75 of 221 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. _______________ RESOLUTION DECLARING APRIL 25TH, 2025, TO BE ARBOR DAY AND MAY 2025 TO BE ARBOR MONTH IN BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, Trees are an increasingly vital resource in Minnesota today, enriching lives by purifying air and water, helping conserve soil and energy, serving as recreational settings, providing habitat for wildlife of all kinds, and making our cities more livable; and WHEREAS, Trees in our City increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community; and WHEREAS, Human activities such a pollution, as well as drought, disease, and insects threaten our trees, creating the need for concerted action to ensure the future of urban and rural forests in our state, country, and world; and WHEREAS, People can contribute to the environmental stewardship of our community by locally planting trees and ensuring that these trees are nurtured, protected, and wisely used in the years ahead; and WHEREAS, The City of Brooklyn Center desires to continue its tree management efforts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that 1. APRIL 25TH, 2025, to be Arbor Day in the City of Brooklyn Center. 2. MAY 2025 to be Arbor Month in the City of Brooklyn Center. 3. I urge all citizens to support efforts to care for our trees and woodlands and to support our City’s Community Forestry Program. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Page 76 of 221 RESOLUTION NO. _______________ whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 77 of 221 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 5/5/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Lydia Ener, Assistant City Engineer THROUGH: Elizabeth Heyman, Director of Public Works BY: Lydia Ener, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Recognizing Brooklyn Center as a Tree City USA for the Thirty-Third Consecutive Year Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve a resolution recognizing Brooklyn Center as a Tree City USA Background: For each of the past thirty-three years, Brooklyn Center has strived for and achieved designation as a Tree City USA by the National Arbor Day Society. The City has again been notified that Brooklyn Center has received this recognition for its 2024 efforts. This national award recognizes communities with effective community forestry programs. Also, the City has been notified that Brooklyn Center has received a Growth Award for additional commitment to expanding its forestry efforts. The City’s Forestry Program includes the following: • Care for and planting of park and boulevard trees • Diseased and nuisance tree removal program • Mandatory tree contractor registrations requiring certain minimums of liability insurance • Boulevard tree planting permits requiring proper placement of trees and selection of tree species • A tree ordinance specifying proper standards of care for all trees • An Arbor Day and Month Program that includes educational activities and an event to promote the planting of trees • Awarded Canopy Grant Improvement Projects Budget Issues: Funding needed to support and meet the goals of this program in 2025 is included in the 2025 Forestry operating budget. Inclusive Community Engagement: NA Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: NA Page 78 of 221 Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Tree City USA 2025 Resolution Page 79 of 221 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO._______________ RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE DESIGNATION OF BROOKLYN CENTER AS A TREE CITY USA FOR THE THIRTY-THIRD CONSECUTIVE YEAR WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is committed to preserving and enhancing its urban forest; and WHEREAS, the National Arbor Day Society has designated the City of Brooklyn Center as a Tree City USA in recognition of 2024 forestry activities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The City Council hereby recognizes and accepts the designation of Tree City USA for the thirty-second consecutive year. 2. The City Council hereby recognizes and accepts the designated Growth Award. 3. The City Council reaffirms its commitment to urban forestry and directs staff to continue reforestation efforts as planned and budgeted in 2025. 4. The City Council commends Brooklyn Center residents and staff for their work in maintaining and enhancing Brooklyn Center’s urban forest. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 80 of 221 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 5/5/2025 TO: City Council FROM: LaToya Turk, Director of Community Prevention, Health & Safety THROUGH: BY: LaToya Turk, Director of Community Prevention, Health & Safety SUBJECT: Office of Community Prevention, Health and Safety Annual Council Report Requested Council Action: No Council request for this presentation Background: Annually, all departments present to the City Council department updates. This is the annual report from the Office of Community Prevention, Health and Safety. Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. OCPHS Department Annual Report Page 81 of 221 4/24/2025 1 OCPHS Department Annual Report April 28th,2025, City Council Meeting LaToya Turk, Director Overview •Office of Community Prevention, Health and Safety structure •Division presentations: Community Engagement, Arts & Beautification, Public Health & Safety •2025 Priorities 2 1 2 Page 82 of 221 4/24/2025 2 Director Community Engagement Coordinator Community Engagement Specialist Artist in Residency 3 Community Engagement 4 3 4 Page 83 of 221 4/24/2025 3 Core Functions Outreach and Trust-Building •The team facilitates direct connection between the City and the community through relationship-centered outreach. This includes presence at community events, neighborhood conversations, and targeted efforts to engage all stakeholders, especially underrepresented populations. By listening and responding to stakeholders, the team fosters transparency, accessibility, and trust in local government. Program Collaboration •The community engagement team works with city wide departments to plan community-informed programs and initiatives. Whether it's co-creating policies, gathering feedback on city initiatives, or coordinating public forums, the engagement team ensures that the community is an active partner in shaping outcomes that impact their quality of life. Equity, Inclusion, and Cultural Responsiveness •Ensuring that engagement practices are inclusive, culturally competent, and accessible is a cornerstone of the engagement team's work. This includes providing language support, designing multi-format engagement options (in-person and virtual), and centering voices from a diverse group of backgrounds. Community Engagement 5 Internal/External strategic planning team Community Partnerships Metric incorporation Program Highlights 2004 Accomplishments 6 5 6 Page 84 of 221 4/24/2025 4 2024 metrics 7 8 7 8 Page 85 of 221 4/24/2025 5 2025 Community Engagement Priorities Strengthen Community Partnerships for Shared Impact Deepen relationships with residents, grassroots/local organizations, faith institutions, businesses, and regional partners to build a more collaborative ecosystem of engagement. Key Strategies: •Formalize partnerships with community-based organizations. •Establish a Community Partner Advisory Group to co-design programs and provide feedback on city initiatives. •Support co-hosted events and initiatives that elevate trusted community voices and increase resident participation. 9 2025 Community Engagement Priorities Analyze and Leverage Community Data to Drive Decision-Making Use disaggregated community data and engagement analytics to identify trends, measure reach and equity, and ensure engagement efforts are effectively meeting the needs of all stakeholders. Key Strategies: •Develop an annual Community Engagement Report to track participation. •Utilize data from surveys, public feedback, and digital platforms to guide program improvements. •Incorporate qualitative community stories and lived experience into reports to complement quantitative metrics. 10 9 10 Page 86 of 221 4/24/2025 6 2025 Community Engagement Priorities Implement a Citywide Engagement Strategy Create a unified and consistent approach to public engagement across to increase transparency, coordination, and resident trust. Key Strategies: •Launch and implement a Citywide Community Engagement Strategic Plan guided by the IAP2 framework. •Provide staff training and a standardized toolkit for equitable engagement practices. •Align departmental calendars to support coordinated outreach efforts and reduce engagement fatigue in the community. 11 2025 ARTS & BEAUTIFICATION 12 11 12 Page 87 of 221 4/24/2025 7 Arts & Beautification CORE FUNCTIONS I. CULTURAL AND PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION On April 8, 2024, the City Council established a resolution to establish the inaugural Cultural and Public Arts Commission. This commission serves as a guiding body to enhance community vibrancy by integrating public art into public life. With diverse representation, the commission plays a crucial role in creating a more inclusive, connected, and enriched city environment. The Commission embraces a holistic view of art—as something placed in public space, something that is public space, and something that serves the public interest. This includes: Seek funding opportunities Contributing to improved community health and overall quality of life through arts access Art as a platform for dialogue, inclusion, and cultural expression Art as a tool for placemaking and community identity Public art as an interactive and transformative experience Enhancing the built environment and social infrastructure through public art 13 Major Projects Completed in 2024 14 13 14 Page 88 of 221 4/24/2025 8 Arts and Beautification 2025 PRIORITIES I. Cultural and Public Art Commission II. Public Art Policy III. Adopt-a-Park 15 PUBLIC ART POLICY 16 15 16 Page 89 of 221 4/24/2025 9 17 Public Health & Public Safety Core Functions Strengthening Community Relationships: Focusing on partnering with local organizations to provide health and wellness resources where critical healthcare services Continue to create a coordinated ecosystem of public health stakeholders to improve access to needed services (public safety, mental health resources, economics and access to life essential resources). 18 17 18 Page 90 of 221 4/24/2025 10 Collaborations that focus on service delivery and community partnerships/collaborations •Medpods •Health Fair •Opioid and Narcan Administration Education •Community Crisis Response Team Monthly Meetings •Expanded Response Model 2024 Year in Review 19 2025 Priorities Community Resource Mapping & Gap Analysis Identify existing public health and safety resources across city departments, nonprofits, and health systems. Key Strategies: •Conduct a citywide audit of crisis response services, mental health providers, housing supports, and prevention programs. •Use GIS mapping to visualize areas of over- or under-resourced services. •Create a centralized public dashboard for internal and external stakeholders. 20 19 20 Page 91 of 221 4/24/2025 11 2025 Priorities Data-Driven Framework Objective:Integrate real-time and historical data to shape responsive policy and funding requests. Key Strategies: •Use the Expanded Response Team reports to identify behavioral trends, seasonal shifts, and hotspot emergence. •Convene annual data reviews with civic and business stakeholders. 21 2025 Priorities Strategic Public Health Plan Development Objective:Draft a citywide public health strategy that explicitly addresses social determinants and public safety co-responses. Key Strategies : •Partner with Public Health departments for technical assistance. •Align plan pillars with violence prevention, behavioral health response, emergency preparedness, and environmental health. •Host community listening sessions to co-create objectives and outcomes. 22 21 22 Page 92 of 221 4/24/2025 12 2025 OCPHS Department Strategic Priorities 23 2025 Strategic Priority #1 Ensure a coordinated, public health orientated approach that relies on a diversity of evidence-based approaches to public safety, health, economics and access to life essential resources for residents and business owners within the City. 1. Collaborate with regional partners to develop a public health strategic plan for the City 24 23 24 Page 93 of 221 4/24/2025 13 2025 Priority #2 Continue to provide leadership, programming, coordination and evaluation for implementation on preventative, health equitable and safe practice work plans for an intentional City-centered engagement framework. 2. Implement a citywide community engagement strategic plan. 25 2025 Priority #3 Continue to address the community's need for a holistic approach to the intersection of public health and community safety. 1. Work with internal and external partners to evolve Expanded Response Model (prevention, intervention response and recovery) 26 25 26 Page 94 of 221 4/24/2025 14 Questions 27 27 Page 95 of 221 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 5/5/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Angela Holm, Director of Finance THROUGH: Reggie Edwards, City Manager BY: Angela Holm, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing the Continuation of Municipal Liquor Operations in the City of Brooklyn Center Requested Council Action: Approve a Resolution Authorizing the Continuation of Municipal Liquor Operations in the City of Brooklyn Center Background: Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution - Continuing Liquor Operations 2. 2025 BC Liquor Fund Presentation - Public Hearing Page 96 of 221 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO._______________ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUATION OF MUNICIPAL LIQUOR OPERATIONS IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, The City of Brooklyn Center lawfully owns and operates two municipal liquor stores as defined by Minnesota Statute 340A.601 ; and WHEREAS, The Minnesota Office of the State Auditor issues an annual Analysis of Municipal Liquor Store Operations; and WHEREAS, The State Auditor issued the report for the Year Ended December 31, 2023 on April 2, 2025 in which municipal liquor operations in the City of Brooklyn Center showed a net loss of $42,671 for 2023; and WHEREAS, The State Auditor issued the report for the Year Ended December 31, 2022 on December 13, 2023 in which municipal liquor operations in the City of Brooklyn Center showed a net loss of $59,236 for 2022; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 340A.602 requires that the City Council, shall, in any city in which the report of the operations of a municipal liquor store has shown a net loss in any two of three consecutive years, hold a public hearing on the question of whether the city shall continue to operate a municipal liquor store; and WHEREAS, municipal liquor operations in the City of Brooklyn Center are experiencing increased sales, gross profits, and decreased operating expenses; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, this resolution authorizing continuation of municipal liquor operations is approved. April 28, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Page 97 of 221 RESOLUTION NO. _______________ and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 98 of 221 4/25/2025 1 Liquor Operations Public Hearing October 8, 2018 Review City Council/Public Hearing, April 28, 2025 Angela Holm, Finance Director Greg “Woody” Keehr, Liquor Operations Manager Department Mission Mission: Operate two municipal retail liquor stores to provide for the controlled sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages in the community. Profits from the operations are used to fund projects benefitting the community and avoiding the necessity of larger property tax levies for such projects. 2 1 2 Page 99 of 221 4/25/2025 2 Department Description •Operates within the Fiscal & Support Services Department •Products include spirits, wine, beer, low dose hemp products and related items such as glassware, ice, and non-intoxicating beverages. •Store #1 – 1350 Shingle Creek Crossing •Store #2 – 6930 Brooklyn Boulevard •Enterprise Operation •Focus on Excellent Customer Satisfaction while Maintaining a Positive Fiscal Position •Community Engagement •Food Drive goes to CEAP •Pet Drive goes to Hennepin Humane Society •Partner with other Enterprises or Businesses to Promote The City and its Benefits 3 Staffing Levels 4 2025 FTEs2024 FTEs2023 FTEsPositions 111Liquor Operation Manager 232Liquor Store Manager 223Liquor Store Assistant Manger 222Liquor Store Category Lead (FT) 4.24.24.2Liquor Store Shift Lead (6 PT Staff) 5.55.55.5Store Clerk/ Stocker (19-22 PT Staff) 16.717.716.7TOTAL 3 4 Page 100 of 221 4/25/2025 3 Key Initiatives for 2025 Staff Development •Reintroduce GUEST model customer service training. •Continued Product Training – Knowledge and Location. •Operational education and training for future advancement in the industry Upkeep of Stores •Negotiate and new lease for Store #2 – fiscally and logistically responsible to operations success •Refresh operations aesthetics – partner with distributors for updating in-store and window signage. •Optimize shelving and floor space for product presentation, improved customer flow, and staff safety Review Operations and Adjust for Optimal Efficiency and Fiscal Responsibility •Conduct detailed review of the operation to ensure we are providing great customer experience while delivering a fiscally responsible outcome for the City. Changes will be implemented using an objective and detailed process that ensures positive outcomes. •A good example would be an analysis of promotional sales and hours of business – where can we remove operational costs resulting in an efficient operation/decreasing operational costs while excelling at customer service and interaction. 5 2025 Performance Objectives 6 Performance Objectives Performance LevelsDescription of Performance Measure Target ValueActual Value (2024) Not finalized Previous Value (2023) (2024) $6,700,000 (2025) $6,800.000 $6,721,012.05$6,637,907.39Total Sales (2024) $2,010,000 (30%) (2025) $2,176,100 (32%) $2,064,687.00 (30.72%)$1,974,895.67 (29.75%)Gross Profit (2024) $4,620,00 (2025) $4,623,900 $4,656,325.05$4,663,011.67Cost of Goods 5 6 Page 101 of 221 4/25/2025 4 Operational Impacts •Shifts in social and economic conditions during 2020 and 2021 impacted the stores’ long-standing customer base •Construction of the new store in Shingle Creek Crossing in 2019 led to higher expenses at a time when profits margins were lower than expected •Depreciation – impacts net income/loss •Bond Interest Payments – impacts net income/loss •Bond Principal Payments - impacts cash balance 7 Pathway to Profitability Management roles and expectations set to allow more experience on sales floor Reduction in overall part-time hours Cost savings of $22,000+ with reduction of 30+ part-time hours per week Increased training time for new/existing employees Creates path for employee promotion Creates increasing interest in operations success. Increased Safety for employees and customers Reduction in loss due to theft Engage customers and staff to build relationships and community 8 7 8 Page 102 of 221 4/25/2025 5 Pathway to Profitablity Focused Purchasing Purchase deals on top 30+ selling products. Increased profit through lower costs Cyclical sale pricing on products to maximize sales Competitive pricing on products increase repeat customer base Focused Pricing Maximize profit through set pricing structure Consistent evaluation of pricing to maintain Gross profit margin Create in store sale pricing Competitive with local stores Competitive with larger chains Advertise in windows and on displays to show savings 9 Pathway to Profitability – Trend Tracking Monthly recap of sales A detailed report to both the City Manager and Finance Director Monthly and YTD year over year data Broken down by Store location and total operation Gross Sales Customer counts Average sales Gross Profit by month, year-to-date, and year-over-year Gross sales Cost of Goods sold Gross Profit Profit percentage 10 9 10 Page 103 of 221 4/25/2025 6 Pathway to Profitability 11 Requested Council Action Staff are recommending Council: •Open Public Hearing •Take Public Comments •Close Public Hearing •Approve a Resolution Authorizing the Continuation of Municipal Liquor Operations in the City of Brooklyn Center 12 11 12 Page 104 of 221 4/25/2025 7 13 Questions ? 13 Page 105 of 221 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 5/5/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Ginny McIntosh, Planning Manager THROUGH: Jesse Anderson, Community Development Director BY: Ginny McIntosh, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Resolution Regarding the Recommended Approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2025-002 for a Major Site and Building Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit for Conversion of an Approximately 14,000-Square Foot Former Credit Union to a New Horizon Academy Early Learning Center (7100 Brooklyn Boulevard) Requested Council Action: - Motion to adopt a resolution approving Planning Commission Application No. 2025- 002 for a major amendment to the site and building plan and Conditional Use Permit for conversion of an approximately 14,000-square foot former credit union to a New Horizon Academy Early Learning Center (7100 Brooklyn Boulevard), based on the findings of fact and submitted documentation. Background: New Horizon Academy (“the Applicant”) is requesting review and consideration of a proposal that would convert a former credit union and office building located at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard (“the Subject Property”) into an early learning center (Licensed Day Care Facilities—13 or greater persons). The Subject Property was sold to the current Property Owner, 7100 Brooklyn Blvd LLC, in March 2023. In 2023, Planning Commission Application No. 2023-007 was submitted for City review and consideration of a proposal that would have converted the existing building into a 17-unit multi-family residential building. The application was ultimately denied by City Council and the Subject Property has remained vacant as the Property Owner has not identified alternate uses. Should Planning Commission Application No. 2025-002 be approved, the Property Owner intends to sell the Subject Property to the Applicant. A public hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on March 27, 2025, for the application requests. Mail notifications were mailed to all physical addresses and taxpayers within 350 feet of the Subject Property and the notice posted to the City of Brooklyn Center’s website and to subscribers of the City’s weekly events bulletin. Following a review of the application requests, it was determined that a major amendment to the approved site and building plan was required due to proposed site modifications, including alterations to the existing parking lot to accommodate three (3) new playgrounds, as well as a 100- percent change in the floor use from a former credit union to a Day Care Facility. A public hearing was held at the April 10, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. During the meeting, comments were provided by two residents, who expressed support for the application requests. Page 106 of 221 Resident Diane Sannes noted that Willow Lane School, which was part of the Osseo School District, was located across the street from the Subject Property where the Northwest Family Service Center and CEAP now sit. She presented a photo at the meeting of the Willow Lane school annex, which was constructed on the Subject Property in 1955 and sold to the Village of Brooklyn Center in 1959. The Village of Brooklyn Center offices remained on the Subject Property from 1960 until 1971 and sat vacant for six years until it was renovated for local non-profit CEAP (Community Emergency Assistance Programs), which was founded in 1970. The original school building was destroyed by fire on December 31, 1977, and demolished in May 1978. She thought it interesting that everything appeared to be coming “full circle” with the current proposal for another education use to locate on the Subject Property. Resident Nahid Khan noted she was intrigued to find out that New Horizon Academy, which is a national business, was founded in Brooklyn Center. She mentioned she doesn’t often hear about large businesses being founded in our humble city and suggested that the design of the building reflects and celebrates that history and affirmed that Brooklyn Center does incubate successful businesses. She inquired on whether there might be any artistic or cultural components that could be incorporated into the exterior design of the building. She wished the Applicant success in moving the project forward. City staff received an email from resident Bill Lindig who suggested attention be paid to the anticipated volume of traffic around the entrance to the Subject Property. The resident noted that they did not know the expected traffic generation of the proposed New Horizon Academy, but expected it to be greater than when the building functioned as a credit union. This email was included as Exhibit F in the staff report packet. Representation of the Applicant were present and addressed questions of the Commissioners. New Horizon Academy Executive Vice President and General Counsel Jill Dunkley let the Commissioners know that her mother-in-law founded New Horizon in Brooklyn Center, and today they are the largest family-owned and operated childcare provider in the United States. New Horizon Academy has been in the City for 54 continuous years and are excited to hopefully continue to serve Brooklyn Center families. One of the Commissioners acknowledged resident Nahid Khan’s comment that it is amazing to see how many locations New Horizon Academy has opened and that it is likely one of Brooklyn Center’s most known business “brands.” Another Commissioner noted that the design of the site appeared conducive to the layout of a typical New Horizon Academy location, and appreciated the work put into altering the parking lot and playground layouts. He noted that the current Brooklyn Center New Horizon Academy location is shoehorned into the corner of a strip mall off Humboldt Avenue North and the proposed location would be a great improvement. He appreciated the logic with the new site layout, and noted it was a great solution for the property. Some discussion and questions surrounded proposed modifications of the existing site and stormwater considerations. Project Architect Peter Hilger provided clarification around the catch basins for drainage into the City storm system. Additional questions were presented by the Commissioners on proposed plans to remodel the interior of the building. Page 107 of 221 Mr. Hilger noted that he has worked on New Horizon locations since the late 1980s, and he is tasked with designing and arranging classrooms, and the overall functionality and flow of the interior space. He noted he was initially worried with the layout of the building and ductwork located on the second floor, but was able to work things out. The basement, which previously served as a staff training room, would be modified into an indoor play area. A Commissioner inquired on whether an existing stairwell empties out into the proposed play area. Mr. Hilger noted that the infants and toddlers would be located on the main floor due to licensing requirements, and the preschoolers would be located on the second floor. He noted that, in the event of an emergency, the best situation for younger children is to empty out into a fenced area, rather than an open parking lot. New direct access doors would be installed on the main floor for the infant and toddler rooms, and their procedures require infants to be rolled out in a safety crib. With respect to the traffic and access concerns, Mr. Hilger noted that early learning centers are not elementary schools. Generally, you do not have buses or parents lined up. Instead, you may have two to four cars at any given time for five to 10 minutes at a time. The operating hours do coincide with typical morning and evening rush hours; however, New Horizon Academy tries to educate parents regarding best practices in dropping off, picking up, and safely exiting the site. A Commissioner noted the struggles in exiting the site as a Spire Credit Union member. Mr. Hilger noted that perhaps the County might consider extending the median in the future, which would remove options and force right-turn only exits. It was noted by another Commissioner that in the case of the Penn Avenue location in Minneapolis, they need to operate in tight spaces out of necessity. He noted that the Northwest Family Service Center, which is across Brooklyn Boulevard, is often quite busy. One needs to weigh the practicalities of the site and realize that if there were a better option at present, that New Horizon Academy would locate there. Additional questions were with respect to the ability of a fire truck to turn around on site, the intended hours of operation, how children are brought into and out of the center and security procedures, the process to vacate certain easements, and coordination with Hennepin County given the Subject Property’s adjacency to Brooklyn Boulevard. Following close of the public hearing and consideration of the application and documentation, the Planning Commission elected to unanimously recommend City Council approval (5-0) of Planning Commission Application No. 2025-002. A copy of the April 10, 2025 Planning Commission report and Council resolution are included with this memorandum for Council’s review and consideration. Budget Issues: None to consider at this time. Inclusive Community Engagement: Page 108 of 221 Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report with Exhibits - Planning Commission Application No. 2025-002 2. City Council Resolution - Recommending Approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2025-002 Page 109 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 1 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: April 10, 2025 Application No. 2025-002 Applicant | Property Owner: New Horizon Academy Location: 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Requests: Site and Building Plan (Major Amendment) and Conditional Use Permit Map 1. Subject Property Location. Requested Action New Horizon Academy (“the Applicant”) is requesting review and consideration of a proposal that would convert a former credit union and office building located at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard (“the Subject Property”), into an early learning center (Licensed Day Care Facilities—13 or greater persons)—refer to Exhibit A. The Subject Property was sold to the current Property Owner in March 2023 per Hennepin County records. In 2023, Planning Commission Application No. 2023-007 was submitted for City review and consideration of a proposal that would have converted the building into a 17-unit multi-family residential building. The application was ultimately denied by City Council and the Subject Property has remained vacant as the Property Owner has not identified alternate uses. Should Planning Commission Application No. 2025-002 be approved, the Property Owner intends to sell the Subject Property to the Applicant. • Application Filed: 03/11/2025 • Review Period (60-day) Deadline: 06/09/2025 • Extension Declared: No • Extended Review Period Deadline: Page 110 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 2 Section 35-7605 (Amendments) provides that a major amendment to an approved site and building plan shall be triggered under certain outlined scenarios, including, but not limited to a “20 percent or greater change in the number of parking spaces provided or required.” A review of a major amendment under the City’s Unified Development Ordinance shall follow the procedure set forth for the issuance of a new site and building plan approval. Although Day Care Facilities do not have a standard parking requirement, the major amendment threshold would be triggered as the proposed parking lot and site modifications would result in a greater than 20 percent change to the existing parking lot with respect to the overall number of parking spaces provided as well as ground area coverage. Further, there would be a 100- percent change in the floor use of the former credit union building to accommodate the Day Care Facility use. A public hearing notice for the application requests were published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on March 27, 2025 (Exhibit B). Mail notifications were mailed to all physical addresses and taxpayers within 350 feet of the Subject Property and the notice posted to the City of Brooklyn Center’s website. Existing Conditions Page 111 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 3 Image 1. Existing Site Conditions at Subject Property. Background The Subject Property was home to City of Brooklyn Center City Hall offices for a time before relocation to its current address of 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway. In 1985, under Planning Commission Application No. 85011 (Exhibit C), requests for site and building plan and special use permit approvals were made by then Applicant Uhde/Nelson, Inc. to allow for the construction of two office buildings of a combined approximately 21,180-square feet. This was intended to be a two-phase proposal in which access to the sites was to have been via a single driveway off Brooklyn Boulevard. The first and larger phase (west), which was constructed, was a two-story, approximately 14,000-square foot office building that was noted for occupancy by Edina Realty and slated for 70 parking spaces. The second phase (east), which was never constructed, was earmarked for a smaller two-story, approximately 7,000-square foot office building with 44 parking spaces. At that time, the properties were collectively zoned R5 (Multiple Family Residence) District, which at the time would have accommodated townhouse and multi-family residential products as well as certain licensed residential and non-residential programs and daycare facilities as permitted uses. Certain service-office uses, which were demonstrated to be compatible to existing adjacent land uses, and as approved by City Council, were allowed through approval of a special use permit. With the adoption of the new Unified Development Ordinance in 2023, the Subject Property, along with a number of other properties fronting Brooklyn Boulevard, were re-zoned to the new Neighborhood Mixed-Used District zoning designations of MX-N1 and MX-N2. The Subject Property is currently zoned MX-N2 (Neighborhood Mixed-Use 2) District, which allows for Day Care Facilities with 13 or more persons through issuance of a conditional use permit. The intended nature of the MX-N2 District is to accommodate small-scale, mixed-use neighborhood activity centers with comfortable gathering places, located and scaled to provide minor/convenience services near low density residential neighborhoods. Although the Neighborhood Mixed-Use zoning districts previously had a cap of no more than 7,500- square feet of individual non-residential use within the MX-N1 District, and no more than 10,000-square feet of individual non-residential use in the MX-N2 District, these provisions were recently amended to reflect caps on individual retail uses, rather than all non-residential uses. The Applicant makes mention of a potential variance to exceed this limit in Exhibit A; however, City staff would like to point out that a variance is not needed as their use is not retail. Similarly, the Applicant requests a variance given proposed Page 112 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 4 changes to their front parking lot; however, as the parking lot would ultimately be smaller than it is now, a variance is not necessary. City staff and the Applicant have been in communication with one another since 2023 to identify potential locations for relocation within the City of Brooklyn Center as New Horizon Academy was founded in Brooklyn Center as “New Horizon Nursery School” in the 1970s. The Applicant currently operates in the Humboldt Shopping Center at 6842 Humboldt Avenue North; however, with their lease up in early 2026 and having outgrown their existing space, the Applicant desires to purchase property and expand their footprint in the City of Brooklyn Center. The Applicant has also expressed a desire to maintain its relationships with existing families and avoid any service interruption by securing a new location well before their lease is up. At the time of this application, the Applicant had already reviewed or submitted proposals for multiple properties, including consideration of construction on lands owned by the City’s Economic Development Authority (EDA) at 70th and Brooklyn Boulevard; however, the complexities in securing a revised access easement on lands owned by neighboring St. Alphonsus Church resulted in the Applicant having to identify an alternate location. Site Data: 2040 Land Use Plan: Neighborhood Mixed-Use (N-MU) – 15.01-31 DU/Ac. Neighborhood: West Palmer Lake Current Zoning: Neighborhood Mixed-Use District (MX-N2) – 15-31 DU/Ac. Site Area: Approximately 0.99 acres Surrounding Area: Direction 2040 Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use North PSP/Institutional | LDR (3.01-5 DU/Ac.) Neighborhood Mixed-Use District (MX-N2) | R1 (Low Density Residential) District Institutional (Brooklyn United Methodist Church Overflow Lot) | Single Family Detached South N-MU (15.01-31 DU/Ac.)Neighborhood Mixed-Use District (MX-N2) Office (Boulevard Plaza Office Condominiums) East Industrial/Utility Neighborhood Mixed-Use District (MX-N2) Undeveloped (City Stormwater Pond) West PSP/Institutional | High Density Residential (15.01-31 DU/Ac.) PUD/C1 (Planned Unit Development/Commercial 1) District | Neighborhood Mixed-Use District (MX-N1) Institutional (CEAP, Hennepin County Human Service Center, and Osseo Area Schools Offices) | Apartments (BLVD Apartments – 58 Units) SITE AND BUILDING PLAN The Applicant requests to convert a former credit union and office building, which was initially approved by City Council in 1985 and constructed in 1986, to a Licensed Day Care Facility use. Section 35-4103 (Allowed Use Table) of the City’s Unified Development Ordinance allows for “Licensed Day Care Facilities with 13 and greater persons”within the City’s Neighborhood Mixed-Use (MX-N2) District through approval of a conditional use permit. As the Applicant proposed revisions to existing site improvements, including the removal of certain parking areas on the west and east ends of the property, and conversion of the existing building from a financial institution/office use to a Day Care Facility, a major site and building plan amendment is triggered. Page 113 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 5 Table 1. Excerpt of Section 35-4103 (Allowed Use Table) and Proposed Use of Subject Property. Image 2. Revised Site Plan for Subject Property. Site Design The existing building is non-conforming with respect to its location on the Subject Property and the City’s new zoning provisions, which today would require the building to be located between 5 and 20 feet of the property line along Brooklyn Boulevard, and any parking to be located behind the front build-to line. The Applicant notes in their application submittal that full use of the site is limited as nearly 10% of the site area is comprised of easements, which run along the property perimeter and through the site. There Page 114 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 6 are no plans to expand the existing approximately 14,000-square foot building footprint; however, the Applicant proposes modifications to the site that would provide better functionality for the use. As proposed, the conversion from the existing office use to a childcare facility would require certain site modifications to accommodate three (3) new dedicated playground areas along the north and east ends of the Subject Property. Additionally, the Applicant would install new landscaping, site lighting, a new trash enclosure, play area storage shed, fencing, and monument sign. The Applicant further proposes installation of a new pedestrian link from the front entry of the building to the sidewalk running along the east side of Brooklyn Boulevard and bike rack as the Applicant has indicated some staff members rely on public transportation, ride sharing, or other means to commute to and from work. Minor changes are proposed to the building’s exterior through the installation of a covered entry canopy to offer shelter to parents and children during inclement weather, the restoration of the original roof profile, and new wall signage. As proposed, the site revisions would reduce the amount of impervious surfacing from 74.3% to 60.3%. The maximum allowable impervious surfacing per Chapter 35 in the MX-N2 District is 80%. Traffic | Access |Circulation | Connection The Subject Property is served by a multi-use trail which runs parallel to the property line of the Subject Property and along Brooklyn Boulevard. The 723 (local) Metro Transit bus line provides service at stops located just off the Subject Property, with service by the 761 (express) line located to the north. The Subject Property is accessed via a single, full access curb cut off Brooklyn Boulevard. There are no proposed alterations to this curb cut as part of this proposal. Image 3. Existing Access, Parking, and Circulation on Subject Property. Image 4. Proposed Access, Parking, and Circulation on Subject Property. Page 115 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 7 The Subject Property currently provides 64 on-site parking spaces. The Site Plan (Image 4 above) indicates plans to remove the majority of the front parking area fronting Brooklyn Boulevard to accommodate a toddler play area along the north end of the property. Four (4) parking spaces, and two (2) ADA stalls with a shared loading space would remain. This area has also been designed to provide a hammerhead configuration for a fire apparatus turnaround or emergency vehicles as the rear parking lot located along the eastern edge of the Subject Property would be removed to accommodate a dedicated preschool play yard. This would leave a total of 42 on-site parking spaces for the Subject Property. Similar to school uses, the City of Brooklyn Center does not outline a standard parking calculation for Day Care Facility uses. Instead, Section 35-4302.c (Licensed Day Care Facilities) notes that facilities located in non-residential zoning districts are subject to certain requirements: a.The size of the licensed day care facility is dependent on the size and capacity of the structure and the availability of parking; and b.Pick up/drop off area(s) must be located in close proximity to the front of the building and adjacent to a pedestrian area. The Applicant notes in their application that the Subject Property, as currently designed, is comprised of 64 parking spaces that take up 53% of the total site. As is typical with New Horizon Academy locations, children are physically brought into the facility by their caregivers. Stalls along the front of the building and adjacent to a private sidewalk would be reserved for pick-up and drop-off, with peak times of between 7 a.m. to 10 a.m. and 3:30 to 6:30 p.m. These spaces are, on average, occupied for between 5 and 10 minutes. With over 100 locations across the United States, New Horizon Academy has dialed in on their parking needs with respect to the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual and through establishing three separate calculation metrics. The Applicant assumes: •A rate of 0.24 spaces per student, using 0.24 x 150 students = 36 parking stalls •An average of 2.45 parking spaces per 1,000 SF = 11,750-square feet x 90% = 10,575 SF net/1,000 = 10.6 x 2.45 = 26 parking spaces •An average of 1.22 parking spaces per employee = 25 x 1.22 = 31 parking stalls The Applicant indicates that by averaging each of these metrics results in a need for 31 parking spaces, which is less than the 42 parking spaces identified in the submitted site plan. This does not account for any caregivers or staff that may utilize public transportation, walk, or bike to the Subject Property. City staff reviewed other standalone Day Care Facilities located within the city. The Aubrey Della Early Childhood Family Development Center is located at 6415 Brooklyn Boulevard and is a childcare center (HeadStart) with a total licensed capacity of 84 children. This center is also located in the Neighborhood Mixed-Use (MX-N2) District and along Brooklyn Boulevard, which is a county highway. This site appears to have approximately 60 on-site parking spaces; however, in reviewing their website, it appears Property Owner Parents in Community Action (PICA) also provides comprehensive services including health services, workforce development programs, and parent training opportunities. Another example would be the KinderCare Learning Center at 6020 Earle Brown Drive, which is in a different zoning district, more isolated on a less trafficked street, and farther from public transportation options. This center has a total licensed capacity of 107 children and 25 on-site parking spaces. As is demonstrated in the submitted plans, the minimum drive aisle widths and dimensional standards for parking spaces and drive aisles outlined within Section 35-5504 (Parking Space Standards) appear to be Page 116 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 8 met. The main parking lot would receive a mill and overlay, while the revised front parking lot and a portion of the east parking lot would require full reconstruction. All portions of the parking lot would be bound in B-612 curb and gutter, which is a City requirement. An exception to this would be a 15-foot section of the east parking lot, which would fall within a revised access easement that requires surmountable curb to ensure access to the City’s stormwater pond for maintenance and repairs. New parking lot striping and an internal crosswalk between the new pedestrian connection off the existing public sidewalk (Brooklyn Boulevard) and the front entrance would be provided. City staff requests the Applicant provide an exhibit demonstrating the ability of a fire truck to navigate the proposed hammerhead at the west end of the Subject Property. Lighting The Applicant originally submitted a photometric plan with their application on March 11, 2025. Following an initial review, City staff requested revisions to the plan to ensure illumination levels fell within the acceptable range of between 0.2 and 4-foot candles for an open-air parking lot (Section 35-5400). A revised photometric plan was submitted to the City on March 19, 2025; however, City staff requests additional revisions to provide additional lighting near the entrance to the Subject Property off Brooklyn Boulevard, as there appears to be minimal to no illumination. As there appears to be a light pole located in the County right-of-way adjacent to the site entrance, as well as a private light pole at the south end of the site, the Applicant may need to update the plans with this information or adjust the private light pole illumination levels. The Applicant will also need to revise the illumination levels within five (5) feet of all primary building entrances and exits and pedestrian ways to provide for a minimum of 10 foot-candles within five (5) feet of entrances and exits. The Applicant should ensure any new lighting limits glare for the Boulevard Plaza office condos located to the south of the Subject Property as their windows are located close to the shared property line and parking lot. Depending on when children are utilizing the outdoor play areas, the Applicant may want to determine whether additional pole or pedestrian level bollard lighting might be warranted as the preschool playground provides limited illumination. A total of four (4) new LED light poles and eight (8) new LED wall sconces are proposed for installation. As proposed, the identified mounting heights appear to meet the City’s exterior lighting provisions for maximum heights. Image 5. Proposed New Site Lighting. Page 117 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 9 Trash | Screening| Play Areas The existing trash enclosure located at the northeast corner of the building would be removed and replaced with a new trash enclosure, to be located at the southeast corner of the Subject Property. This relocation is necessary to accommodate the proposed play areas. As proposed, the new trash enclosure would be fully enclosed under a metal roof, with metal horizontal siding, brick, and an overhead door. The enclosure shall be located a minimum of five (5) feet from the interior side and rear property lines and ensure proper clearance from a relocated access easement necessary to provide maintenance and repairs for a stormwater pond located to the east, and existing fire hydrant. In visiting the Subject Property, City staff noted clear visibility to the neighboring single-family residential to the north—refer to Image 6 below. Although the City approvals noted under Planning Commission Application No. 85011 acknowledged an existing cedar hedge along the north and east property lines as an appropriate method of screening from the residential uses, it was also stipulated that replacement screening would be required were it to fail. Image 6. Proposed Trash Building and Fencing Materials. The Applicant proposes installation of three separate play areas to be fenced with a six (6) foot tall black steel ornamental picket fence as noted above (9) and where the area does not abut residential properties. Where the Subject Property abuts residentially zoned properties along the north end of property, the Applicant proposes installation of a six (6) foot high opaque PVC fence (10). Internal fences separating the Page 118 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 10 individual play areas for toddlers, infants, and preschoolers are proposed at five (5) feet in height and provided with gates that utilize panic hardware and pool alarms. In conversations with City Fire staff, it was expressed that the Applicant work with the City to ensure the building can be reasonably accessed in case of emergency, and that a direct path to the east building doors is provided and without the obstruction of multiple gates or fences. City Fire and Building staff further requests that the defined access area to the City stormwater pond and trash enclosure areas are striped for “no parking” to ensure this area is easily accessible, and as there is an existing fire hydrant located just across the property line on City property. All ground-mounted equipment over 30 inches in height or greater than 12 cubic feet (e.g., transformers, mechanical) shall be effectively screened from public view. Similarly, any roof-mounted equipment, including the proposed new HVAC units, shall also be screened from view through use of parapets, wall/ fencing materials, or paint compatible and complementary to the building. Architecture and Building Modifications Image 7. Proposed Exterior Modifications to Existing Building. Page 119 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 11 There are no plans to majorly alter the exterior of the building, with the exception of changes to the existing entrance to create a covered entry canopy for shelter during inclement weather and to create a “centering element.” An existing diamond-like roof element would be removed and the original roofline restored. The majority of the building is comprised of wythe brick and glazing, which meet minimum building material requirements under Section 35-5203. New doors would be installed on the ground floor to comply with licensing and building code direct exiting requirements for children under 30 months (infants and toddlers). The interior of the building would be fully remodeled for classroom space, administrative offices, a kitchen, and a basement training room converted into a large motor (exercise) room. This area would offer a direct exit to the proposed play areas via an existing stairwell on the north end of the property. The building is fully sprinklered at this time and has elevator and stair access. Landscaping The 1985 plans noted a provision for 13 deciduous trees (i.e. Japanese White Birch, Pin Oak, Green Seedless Ash), 15 Evergreens/Conifers (i.e. Colorado Green Spruce), 190 deciduous shrubs (i.e. Red- twigged Dogwood, Goldflame Spirea, Lilacs), and 29 Evergreen Shrubs (i.e. Mugho Pines, Moppet Junipers, Mint Julep Junipers). Although difficult to read, it appears certain ornamental trees, including Canada Red Cherry and Red Splendor Crab, were to be planted. Landscaping proposed for removal is noted on the provided removals plan (Sheet C1.0). City staff are aware of a number of trees that are in poor condition—this is as a tree inventory was submitted with the previously denied Planning Commission Application No. 2023-007, which identified a number of diseased Green Ash on-site, as well as some Siberian Elm and Hackberry. A recent inspection of the site revealed a large tree branch had fallen on an existing fence located on the north end of the property—City staff has requested the current Property Owner remove it. As proposed, all of the existing trees and plantings located along the north end of the Subject Property would be removed due to a combination of their deteriorating condition, as well as accommodating the three (3) play yards, screening, and fencing. Although code regulations under Section 35-5600 desire to preserve existing trees, City staff is supportive of the proposal to remove the plantings identified in Image 8 below due to their condition. Image 8. Proposed Landscaping Removal Along North End of the Subject Property. The Applicant submitted a revised landscape plan (Sheet L1) and planting schedule, which proposes new overstory and ornamental trees, as well as numerous shrubs. The plans presented would provide for grouped plantings, as the Subject Property is constrained with where landscaping and trees can be Page 120 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 12 installed given the number of easements. New landscaping would be installed along the new private pedestrian connection and existing private sidewalk along the south end of the building, around a new monument sign, at the north end of the new front parking lot, and along the north end of the property. Any disturbed portions of City-owned property containing the City’s stormwater pond, which serves the southern half of the Woodbine neighborhood and the Subject Property, would be seeded in a prairie mix. City staff requests the Applicant coordinate with the City on this, and in discussions with the relocation of the existing access easement. Image 9. Submitted Landscape Plan (Sheet L1). The City’s new provisions surrounding landscaping under Section 35-5600 stress that no more than 40- percent of the total trees should be of the same species—this is to promote species diversity and resilience. Additionally, landscape vegetation should emphasize native and resilient plant types where possible. Under the new code, the minimum landscaping requirements within the Neighborhood Mixed- Use District are based on a project’s valuation: Table 2. Minimum Landscape Requirements by Project Value. Page 121 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 13 The Applicant has provided a landscape valuation estimate as part of their submittal, which outlines a minimum landscape valuation in excess of the minimum needed. An underground irrigation system is required for installation in all landscaped areas to help facilitate site maintenance and was noted in the 1985 approvals. This requirement still stands today and any new areas of landscaping or areas with damaged or missing landscaping would require replacement. The submitted landscape plans note the proposed installation of an automatic and programmable underground irrigation system. Signs The Applicant has made no specific requests for signage and will need to comply with Section 35-6000 (Signs) of the City Code. As proposed, it appears the Applicant intends to remove an existing cabinet sign located at the front of the building. This sign would be replaced and the roofline restored with a new wall sign located on the west elevation of the building. The Applicant further proposes removal of an existing monument sign located immediately off the public sidewalk, and relocation to approximately where an existing ATM island is located. Any signage is subject to separate review and permit approval. Image 10. Proposed Wall and Monument Signage. Engineering Review Touyia Lee, Principal Engineer, reviewed the submitted plans and provided a memorandum dated April 4, 2025 (Exhibit D). The Applicant will need to amend plans as necessary, and meet all requirements as outlined within this memorandum. The Applicant will need to coordinate with Hennepin County as necessary to address any requirements of theirs and secure a right-of-way permit should any work take place within County right-of-way (Brooklyn Boulevard). Separately, the Applicant intends to vacate and dedicate certain easements to facilitate the proposed site improvements on the Subject Property. This will require the Applicant to apply for these revisions with the City of Brooklyn Center Engineering Division. Image 11. Proposed Easement Vacations (Red) and New Easements (Blue). Page 122 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 14 Building and Fire Review Building Official Dan Grinsteinner conducted a cursory review in a memorandum dated April 4, 2025 (Exhibit E) of the proposal for the Subject Property and indicated that fire sprinkler and monitoring systems are required by code and are to be maintained at all times. As was previously noted, the building is currently sprinklered. Given the proposed conversion, select sprinkler heads and systems may need to be relocated as part of the building’s renovation. The fire hydrant located on the City stormwater pond property and at the east end of the site shall maintain a minimum 20-foot clearance around the hydrant per City Ordinance Section 5-113. The Applicant will also need to meet any minimum ADA requirements for any exterior and interior building improvements. The exterior egress stairs provided from the lower level shall be provided with a guardrail to protect any children utilizing the play area from falling. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a SAC determination shall be submitted to the Metropolitan Council given the change of use. Any associated fees shall be paid at time of permit issuance. The Applicant will need to coordinate with the Hennepin County Health Department for the proposed kitchen area, and the State Department of Labor and Industry (DLI) will need to review any plumbing plans that identify the addition or relocation of more than five (5) fixtures. All building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. Other Considerations | Public Comment (to date) As mentioned in the beginning of the report, a public hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post, mail notifications were sent to all physical addresses within 350 feet of the Subject Property, and the notice published to the City’s website. To date, the City is in receipt of one email dated April 6, 2025. The email is from a residential property owner located off 71st Avenue North—Refer to Exhibit F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The Applicant requests issuance of a conditional use permit to allow for conversion of a former credit union and office building to a Licensed Day Care Facility. As proposed, the approximately 14,000-square foot building would serve up to 172 children and 23 staff; however, the Applicant reinforces that “172” is a maximum capacity. Operationally, occupancy at New Horizon’s existing centers averaged 143 children and 23 staff. The Applicant assumes an average 70% occupancy rate at any time, as “licensed capacity” in childcare settings is focused on design standards for classrooms and play spaces. Page 123 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 15 The interior of the building would be broken up into classroom and administrative space, kitchen, an approximately 1,014-square-foot large motor room, sensory room for individual or small group interactions, a mother’s room, and storage. Anticipated site improvements would result in the removal of parking spaces to accommodate three (3) new play yards for toddlers, infants, and preschoolers, new landscaping and lighting, signage, and a new pedestrian connection. Conditional use permits, as outlined under Section 35-7700, are those uses which have been identified, because of their nature, operation, location, special requirements or characteristics, and that may only be allowed in a particular zoning district after submittal of an application, review, and recommendation by the Planning Commission, and approval by the City Council. The conditional use permit process regulates: the location, magnitude, and design of conditional uses consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and the regulations, purposes, and procedures of this Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). A conditional use permit may not be granted by the City Council unless the following criteria have been satisfied (Note: Applicant responses are transcribed from the submitted narrative—Exhibit A): a.The conditional use will be in accordance with the general objectives, or with any specific objective, of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and this UDO. Applicant Response: We agree to the best of our knowledge and belief. City Staff Response (Finding): “Licensed Day Care Facility” uses with 13 or greater persons are permitted through issuance of a conditional use permit within the Neighborhood Mixed-Use (MX-N2) District where the Subject Property is located. The existing building located on the Subject Property was originally approved by City Council in 1985 and constructed in 1986. Although the Subject Property is non- conforming with respect to setbacks and the location of parking in front of the front building line, the Applicant is not proposing any expansion or increase in parking between the right-of-way and building that would render the property more non-conforming. In fact, the Applicant intends to substantially reduce parking in the front of the building and remove an existing ATM island to accommodate a smaller parking lot with emergency access turnaround, a dedicated toddler playground, and install new landscaping. A private pedestrian connection and sidewalk would be located off the public multi-use path and sidewalk running parallel to Brooklyn Boulevard and bike parking installed. City staff interpret these alterations as a means to make the property conform more with current code requirements. In 2019, the Subject Property was future re-guided to “Neighborhood Mixed-Use (N-MU):” Page 124 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 16 Although this is not a redevelopment site, the Applicant’s willingness to rehabilitate a property that requires reinvestment and reimagining for a second life address the City’s 2040 Land Use & Redevelopment Goals. The neighborhood nodes identified for the Neighborhood Mixed-Use (N-MU) designation call out the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor for potential smaller-scale retail, restaurant, and service amenities to the surrounding neighborhoods, and with the idea that existing neighborhood residents could walk, bike, or be within a reasonable distance to local amenities and services. Unlike the broader Twin Cities region, in which the population continues to age, Brooklyn Center’s population grew younger between 2000 and 2010. This is due to an increase in the number of people aged 25 to 34, many of which were starting families and having children. Not surprisingly, increases in the number of young families ultimately place demands on schools, housing affordability, and the types of retail goods and services needed. Although the 2040 Comprehensive Plan noted a median age of residents as 32.8 (2016), the 2020 US Census identified a median age of 32.4 in Brooklyn Center. The median age in Minnesota is 39. It should be of no surprise that the American Community Survey estimates (2018-2022) identify approximately 9% of Brooklyn Center’s population as being under 5 years of age. This demographic falls directly into the Applicant’s area of focus of providing childcare to children from infancy up through preschool years. In the last couple years, City staff has received additional interest and applications to establish daycares in the City. b.The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. Applicant Response: We do not believe our facility to be detrimental or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. City Staff Response (Finding): The Subject Property has been vacant for at least two years. The current Property Owner purchased the Subject Property and submitted a proposal for review and consideration of a conversion from office to multi-family residential; however, the request was ultimately denied. The building and property have remained vacant since. As proposed, the childcare center would operate Monday through Friday, from 6 a.m. to 6 or 6:30 p.m. New Horizon Academy currently operates over 100 locations across the country and their standard practice requires children to physically be brought into the center by their respective caregivers. Drop off areas are not used, and it is anticipated parking spaces would be reserved closest to the door for use by parents, guardians, etc. Peak drop-off typically occurs between the hours of 7 and 10 a.m., and pick-up is typically between 3:30 to 6:30 p.m. Parking spaces are generally occupied for short 5 to 10-minute periods of time. There is one full access curb cut that serves the Subject Property; therefore, limiting traffic to only those visiting the proposed childcare center. The Subject Property was last occupied by Electrus Credit Union and featured a standalone ATM located towards the front (west) of the building. All three play areas would be enclosed with a 6-foot exterior fence and internal 5-foot fences between play areas, and the gates provided with alarms. To minimize negative impacts on neighboring businesses, and to ensure adequate distancing from Brooklyn Boulevard, the play areas are proposed for location at Page 125 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 17 the north and east ends of the building. The closest play area to Brooklyn Boulevard (toddler) would be nearly 50 feet from the property line, and the play area closest to the City’s stormwater pond (preschool) would be fenced in, with the nearest gate located to the west and adjacent to the building wall. City staff are aware of numerous trees located on the Subject Property that are either diseased and/or in poor condition. As part of the Applicant’s proposal, these trees would be removed. This would help address some safety concerns as City staff noted a large tree branch had fallen on a chain link fence located at the north end of the property. The Applicant further outlines plans to modify the existing parking lot through either full reconstruction or a mill and overlay. A new trash enclosure building would be installed, obscuring any view of trash behind a garage door, and the north end of the property, which abuts single-family residential properties, screened with an opaque fence. c.The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. Applicant Response: We believe our conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. City Staff Response (Finding): City staff discussed concerns raised by neighboring property owners and with respect to a reuse of the Subject Property with the Applicant after the denial of Planning Commission Application No. 2023-007, which contemplated renovation of the Subject Property from a financial institution/office use to multi-family residential. The Applicant intends to invest over $2 million into the 38-year-old building and property through modifications to the parking lot, the installation of new play areas, fencing and screening, sidewalks, new exterior lighting, new signage, and revisions to the front entrance. New rooftop HVAC units would be installed, and the interior of the building renovated for the new use. The Applicant has designed the site to minimize any potential disruptions to surrounding businesses located in the Boulevard Plaza office condos to the south by locating the playground at the north end of the Subject Property and through enhancements to the property. Although it is likely the childcare center would operate during the same general hours as many of the businesses to the south, the peak traffic occurrences would be limited to the morning and evening hours, rather than throughout the day. d.The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. Applicant Response: We believe our proposed development does not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property. City Staff Response (Finding): The surrounding properties are generally developed with the exception of an overflow parking lot owned by neighboring Brooklyn United Methodist Church, which is utilized in the warmer months as an outdoor farmers’ market. There are some single-family residential property owners located to the north of the Subject Property, and an office condominium development (Boulevard Plaza) located to the south. The area to the east is owned by the City of Brooklyn Center and functions as a stormwater pond for properties located within the southern half of the Woodbine neighborhood, including the Subject Property. Directly across from the Subject Property, on the west side of Brooklyn Page 126 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 18 Boulevard, are the BLVD Apartments (formerly Willow Lane), CEAP (Community Emergency Assistance Programs), Hennepin County Northwest Human Service Center, and Osseo Schools Adult Education offices. City Staff does not foresee this business model and use interrupting the normal or orderly operations of surrounding property for the uses permitted for the Neighborhood Mixed-Use (N-MU) land use designation properties, including the Boulevard Plaza office condominiums and Brooklyn United Methodist Church overflow lot located along the east side of Brooklyn Boulevard. While the proposed use would generate more traffic to and from the site, as the Subject Property is currently vacant, the proposed Day Care Facility use would ultimately generate lesser traffic levels than certain other uses permitted within the MX-N2 zoning district (e.g. retail shopping center, grocery store). e.Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress, egress, and parking so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. Applicant Response: As we are using an existing, well-established point of ingress and egress, and parking is actually reduced from prior uses, it represents that we have taken adequate measures to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. City Staff Response (Finding): There are no plans to alter the existing ingress/egress off Brooklyn Boulevard. Although there are plans to modify the existing parking lot to remove parking spaces, the Applicant has provided an example traffic and parking study outlining typical trip generation and parking needs found at a New Horizon Academy location—refer to Exhibit A. The City does not have a standard parking calculation for licensed Day Care Facilities. In reviewing the materials provided, parents and caregivers would park in spaces located along the south side of the building and bring their children in. There would be no designated pick-up or drop-off area, so there should be no potential queueing in the public streets. Further, by removing the majority of parking from the front of the building, drivers would not need to make additional turn movements and would instead drive straight into the main parking lot, which extends to the back of the property. As is typical with childcare centers, traffic would peak during certain morning and evening hours, rather than carry on throughout the day (e.g. financial institution, retail store). In reviewing the Applicant’s provided parking and traffic information, they indicate that the maximum number of parking spaces occupied would likely be around 8 a.m. and assume 24 parking spaces in use. Although the Applicant intends to remove parking spaces, around 18 parking spaces would still be available based on these calculations. The Applicant notes that there is a regional justification for lowering the parking needs for the use as the Subject Property is served by public transportation, and they anticipate a higher level of mass transit users. The parking and traffic study provided, which utilizes their East Apple Valley location as a baseline, is not well served by public transportation. The Applicant’s architect has designed over 120 childcare centers across the country and in reviewing other locations with respect to parking densities, finds as follows for suburban locations: Page 127 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 19 Table 3. Childcare Center Site Comparisons based on Facility Size, Child Capacity, and Provided Parking Ratio. Based on the above information, the proposed Brooklyn Center location would be provided at a ratio of approximately 4.14. City staff reviewed other standalone daycare locations in Brooklyn Center, including the Aubrey Della Early Childhood Center off Brooklyn Boulevard, which has capacity for 84 children and approximately 60 on-site parking spaces, but also offers workforce development and parent training services, and KinderCare off Earle Brown Drive, which has a capacity for 107 children, but only 25 parking spaces. In reviewing both locations, it appeared both locations were providing sufficient parking. f.Impacts such as noise, hours of activity, and exterior lighting have been sufficiently addressed to mitigate negative impacts on nearby uses. Applicant Response: Other than the sound of children playing inconsistently during business hours, and we do not operate at night, we have adequately addressed this concern. City Staff Response (Finding): As proposed, the childcare center would operate Monday through Friday from approximately 6 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No weekend or evening childcare hours would be provided. The proposed play areas would be located toward the north end of the site, which would offer additional separation for any noise generated by children while playing, and from the office condo business owners. The Applicant also proposes to install new exterior site lighting in the form of new light poles and wall sconces. Although the Applicant will need to revise the provided photometric plans to address decreased illumination levels near the driveway entrance and front entry locations, the proposed lighting fixtures meet code requirements, and the majority of the parking lot falls within City-required illumination range levels. City staff requests that the Applicant ensure no excessive glare is cast off toward the Boulevard Plaza office condos to the south, as their windows face the Subject Property parking lot. g.The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. Page 128 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 20 Applicant Response: We agree to the best of our knowledge and belief. City Staff Response (Finding): City staff will continue to work with the Applicant pending approval of the requested conditional use permit to ensure the City’s regulations for the district in which the Subject Property is located are address. As is the case with any other property in the City of Brooklyn Center, should any business operations, nuisance, or property complaints arise, the City would address these through the typical channels (e.g. code enforcement). ANTICIPATED PERMITTING AND CONDITIONS Following a review of the submitted materials and the request, City staff recommends the following conditions be attached to any positive recommendation on the approval of a major site and building plan amendment and conditional use permit for Planning Commission Application No. 2025-002, which would allow for the conversion of the former Electrus (Spire) Credit Union office building, located at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard, to a New Horizon Academy early learning center: 1.The Applicant shall adhere to the provisions as outlined under Section 35-7700 (Conditional Use Permits) and coordinate with City staff to file a copy of the City Council resolution approving the requested conditional use permit, along with a legal description of the Subject Property for which the permit was issued, and list of any conditions set forth by City Council as a condition of said conditional use permit. A certified resolution shall be recorded by the Applicant with the Hennepin County Recorder—Registrar of Titles pending approval of the related application. i.The Day Care Facility shall maintain a valid license and a copy of said license and application shall be submitted to the City annually. Failure to maintain a license shall be subject to the conditions outlined under Section 35-7700. 2.Any major changes or modifications made to this Site and Building Plan, and as outlined within the City Code, can only be made by an amendment to the approved Site and Building Plan as approved by the City Council. i.The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official and as outlined in the memorandum dated April 4, 2025 with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. ii. The Applicant shall apply for and obtain separate City approval for the vacation and dedication of certain easements located on the Subject Property. iii. A SAC Determination shall be submitted by the Applicant to the Metropolitan Council for the change of use and any associated fees paid at the time of any permit issuance. iv. Photometric Plans and any proposed lighting fixtures are to comply with Section 35-5400 (Exterior Lighting). v.The Applicant shall ensure an irrigation system is in place to facilitate maintenance of new and existing site landscaping and green areas, and irrigation shop drawings for any new systems shall be submitted for review and approval prior to installation. 3.Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view per City Code requirements and a detail sheet provided. i.Per City Code requirements, the proposed trash enclosure shall be located a minimum of five (5) feet from the interior and rear property lines, provide a minimum 20-foot clearance from an existing fire hydrant located on City Page 129 of 221 App. No. 2025-002 PC 04/10/2025 Page 21 property, and the area shall be striped for no parking. 4.The Applicant shall work to ensure all applicable Minnesota Fire Code requirements have been met as part of any site plan approval and with respect to the proposed modifications to the building. i.A fire sprinkler system is required to be installed and shall be maintained on a consistent basis per City Code requirements. 5.The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the Principal Engineer’s review memorandum, dated April 4, 2025. 6.Application to and approval from the Hennepin County Health Department as needed for the proposed kitchen area. 7.The Applicant shall submit a Sign Permit Application for any proposed signage (e.g., wall, freestanding) and receive issuance of a permit prior to any installation. Signage shall comply with the City of Brooklyn Center sign code provisions for a Neighborhood Mixed- Use District property. Recommendation Based on the above-noted findings, City staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council: Approval of a major site and building plan amendment and conditional use permit that would allow for the renovation of a former financial institution and office building to an approximately 14,000-square foot New Horizon Academy early learning center (Licensed Day Care Facilities—13 or greater persons) located at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard, based on the submitted plans and findings of fact, as amended by the Conditions of Approval in the April 10, 2025 Planning Commission Report. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A – Planning Commission Application No. 2023-007 Plans and Documents, submitted March 11, 2025. Exhibit B – Public Hearing Notice, submitted for publication in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post, dated March 27, 2025. Exhibit C – Report and Documentation for Planning Commission Application No. 85011. Exhibit D – Review Memorandum, prepared by Principal Engineer, Touyia Lee, dated April 4, 2025. Exhibit E – Review Memorandum, prepared by Building Official Dan Grinsteinner, dated April 4, 2025. Exhibit F – Public Comment (email), dated April 6, 2025. Page 130 of 221 - 1 - Rylaur, LLC 14 Pheasant Lane North Oaks, MN 55127-2512 612-868-3636 March 11, 2025 SUMMARY REPORT TO: Ms. Ginny McIntosh; City Planner, City of Brooklyn Center FROM: A. Peter Hilger, AIA philger@rylaur.com RE: Proposal for New Horizon Academy 7100 Brooklyn Blvd. North Please find attached documentation necessary for the city of Brooklyn Center to review the feasibility of a childcare facility on the referenced parcel, and to issue a Conditional Use Permit thereon. ABOUT NEW HORIZON ACADEMY New Horizon Academy is a high-quality early learning provider that is 4-Star Parent Aware rated and accredited by the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC), the gold standard in the early childhood industry. New Horizon Academy has been serving metro area families since 1971. In fact, New Horizon Academy opened its first school in Brooklyn Center at 1200 69th Avenue N. Currently, it operates a school located at 6842 Humboldt Avenue N. Their current facility is tired, and numerous negotiations with their landlord for improvements to their school and the overall development have been unsuccessful. As such, New Horizon Academy would like to find a viable replacement option where it can create a new first-class school that will also increase the capacity in order for it to serve more families in the Brooklyn Center community. They have looked tirelessly for a viable option without success. Please see attached letter from New Horizon Academy. If it does not find a viable replacement option before their lease expires in 2026, enrolled families will be displaced, and the community will lose this cherished asset. This new school will be a first-class, remodeling of an existing two-story building to meet the site and building program criteria. It will include an indoor large motor room, 3 playgrounds; have increased capacity and additional programming features that their current facility is unable to provide. ABOUT THE SITE The site is located at 7100 Brooklyn Blvd. on one parcel roughly 48,095 SF with nearly 10% of the site area allocated for utility easements (PID:2711921330097). The site is currently zoned MX-N2 Neighborhood Mixed Use, but was constructed under an older ordinance. Childcare is an approved use by Conditional use Permit, as presently applied, and is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The ordinance limits buildings in this district to 10,000 SF of gross building area on this site, however, as this building is existing and was constructed in 1987, with no increase in building footprint proposed, we respectfully request a variance of 1,212 SF to increase to our desired capacity of roughly 12,127 SF (10% variance, excluding basement). Exhibit A Page 131 of 221 - 2 - Rylaur, LLC 14 Pheasant Lane North Oaks, MN 55127-2512 612-868-3636 The proposed use as a childcare center does not generate any environmental concerns, nor does it generate noise (except children at play – hopefully deemed a pleasant sound). Hours of operation are generally 6:00 AM to 6:00 or 6:30 PM, Monday through Friday. New parking lot and building lighting is proposed to be glare free and energy efficient. A Phase 1 Environmental Evaluation has been prepared by Caltha,LLP dated 02.17.2025 and summarized no recognized environmental hazards. A geotechnical evaluation has been ordered for the purposes of supporting playground equipment, and an ALTA survey by Civil Site Group is complete. The site is sufficiently large enough to accommodate adequate parking and sufficient play space, as this report will demonstrate. BUILDING AND OCCUPANCY At 12,127 SF+/-, this two-story building is intended to visually blend with, and improve, the general characteristics of its commercial neighbors. The actual program breaks down as follows: NEW CENTER Compared to EXISTING CENTER Infants: 2 rooms @12 = 24 Infants: 9 Transition: 1 room @14 = 14 Transition: 0 Toddler: 2 rooms @14 = 28 Toddler: 15 Preschool: 4 rooms @21 = 84 Young Pre: 14 PreSchool: 33 TOTAL CHILD COUNT: 150 + 24 staff 69 Typical Industry Occupancy Rate 80% (conservative) TOTAL Anticipated Population Daily Density: 133 With accessory spaces as follows: Large Motor Play Space: 1,014 SF for use by occupants (one full classroom at a time per licensing) Sensory Room: individual or very small group interactions Mother’s Room Various Storage, Service and Administrative functions Operationally, on any typical operating day during the school year at New Horizon’s typical existing centers, daily attendance averaged 143 children (typical school capacity is 172 children, 75% occupancy rate) and 23 staff, including families that have two children attending. Average for childcare centers generally is a 70% occupancy rate at any given time. It is important to note that licensed capacity is strictly focused on design standards for classrooms and play spaces. Rarely are any centers fully occupied. Finally, many staff also have their own children in the program, or also rely on public transportation, ride sharing and other means to access the site. A segregated, fully enclosed trash enclosure is proposed on the southeast side of the property, proposed to be constructed of similar materials to match the building. Its location is designed to avoid many utility easements. The building will be classified as Type II-N construction, I-4 / E occupancies with an existing fire sprinkler system for the entire building. Page 132 of 221 - 3 - Rylaur, LLC 14 Pheasant Lane North Oaks, MN 55127-2512 612-868-3636 ARCHITECTURE The building is relatively durable for a structure exceeding 38 years old. Constructed of full wythe brick spandrel panels and ribbon windows surrounding the entire perimeter, we had a structural, mechanical and electrical inspection completed. Some structural remediation may be necessary as new HVAC units are proposed to be added to meet current ASHRAE codes. The roof is in good condition, and the existing rooftop unit HVAC is also relatively new. Fully sprinklered and hosting a working, licensed elevator, the building is easily remodeled into a childcare facility. In order to comply with licensing and building codes, all children under 30 months (infant and toddlers) will be co-located on the ground floor with new exit doors to the exterior from the classroom spaces. The upper level will host four preschool rooms. Mobility to the lower-level playground spaces will be through the east stairwell and the elevator, as the case may require. Child-friendly handrails are provided at all stairs. The existing basement contains mechanical rooms and is serviced by the elevator and two stairwell exits. Formerly a training room, the windowless space is being converted into a large motor (exercise activity) facility and not as a permanent classroom space. Large motor rooms are a common accessory function within many childcare centers. Overall, the building is well- adapted to meet the needs of New Horizon Academy. Figure 1: View from southwest entrance of the existing facility Figure 2: View of north property frontage Page 133 of 221 - 4 - Rylaur, LLC 14 Pheasant Lane North Oaks, MN 55127-2512 612-868-3636 We do not plan any major changes to the building or its essential character other than to remodel the existing entrance elements, creating a covered entry canopy to best transition parents and children to enter during inclement weather, as well as to create a “centering element.” We will remove what we believe was an added diamond-like device at the roof line and restore the original roof profile and materials. The new entrance is planned to look like this: Figure 3: Redeveloped entry feature PLAY SPACES New Horizon Academy is committed to well-designed play-spaces, ones that do not rely solely upon large motor skill equipment, but also some natural elements that invite a child’s explorative curiosity in keeping with their mission. The plans call for the three different play areas (infant, toddler, and preschool). Additionally, the play areas will utilize best practices for safety, and all exceed the licensing 1,500 minimum play space requirement. The play areas are all designed well above the licensing standard minimum areas (75 SF per child except infants that do not require dedicated play space), proposed to be sized as follows: (subject to final site design): · Infant area: 496 SF for 12 infants = maximum one room per play (crawl) session · Toddler Area: 3,718 SF for 28 children = maximum two rooms max per session · Preschool Area: 6,011 SF for 63 children = maximum 2 or 3 classrooms per session The surfacing of the play areas is entirely a cushioned, low maintenance artificial turf (fall zone) with a subsurface drainage weep system. FENCING, AMENITIES, LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING, AND SIGNAGE Each of the three age-segregated play areas are proposed to be fenced with a 6’-0” high black steel ornamental picket style (no screening or opacity) where not abutting a residential neighbor. In that situation, we propose a 6’-0” high opaque screen plastic fence on the mutual property boundary. Internal fences separating play spaces from each other are 5’ high (such as between Toddler and Preschool play-spaces. All fence gates would be secured with panic hardware and pool alarms. Page 134 of 221 - 5 - Rylaur, LLC 14 Pheasant Lane North Oaks, MN 55127-2512 612-868-3636 The proposed landscape is designed for a variety of species, densities and textures. Landscaping is not specifically called for within the play spaces due to lack of survivability in that environment. Based on an existing tree inventory provided by the City, many of the existing trees will be removed as either diseased or invasive. Several specimen trees have been preserved. The landscape will be fully irrigated with a system using water efficient technologies such as water saving sensors, a flow meter, and dripline in the planting beds. A new pedestrian link from the front entry to the public way is also being created, along with a bicycle rack to improve pedestrian access. A new fully enclosed trash enclosure and a small storage shed serving the preschool play area is also proposed, to be clad partially in brick to match the building sill height, with the remainder as steel siding. We are proposing to install a ground mounted monument style sign consistent with our prototypical standards, as well as one building mounted sign on the brick spandrel facing Brooklyn Boulevard. Figure 4: Proposed Monument Sign (or similar) PARKING AND CIRCULATION Section 35-5506 of the Unified Development Code does not appear to provide a specific parking requirement for childcare use, however it does prohibit parking in the designated front yard. Paragraph (d) thereunder states that for uses not covered by the list, the minimum shall be the number of “spaces as required for the most similar use as determined by the zoning administrator.” Consider the following evidence: 1. The existing lot comprises 64 stalls over 25,575 SF of paved surface area (53% of lot). 2. We propose a 41-stall facility over 15,445 SF (32% of lot area) with a hammerhead configuration at the northwest end adequate for fire apparatus turnaround. 3. The existing front yard parking and ATM drive through area comprise 7,748 SF (16% of lot area) for 15 cars. The proposed front yard parking lot configuration reduces the paving to 2,723 SF (6% of lot area) for 6 cars, a reduction of 10% of the total paved lot area and 9 fewer cars parked while preserving an emergency vehicle turnaround. 4. The total paved surface area is reduced by roughly 10,000 SF, totaling 20% of lot area, and 39% of the hard surface parking area, converting that savings to children’s play spaces and improved landscaping. Given this significant reduction of parking in the front yard, and the fact this is a building and site that predates the current zoning ordinance, we respectfully request a variance to the full elimination of parking in the front yard. The difference in parking lot configurations is best illustrated as follows: Page 135 of 221 - 6 - Rylaur, LLC 14 Pheasant Lane North Oaks, MN 55127-2512 612-868-3636 Figure 5: Proposed Existing to New Parking Lot Configuration Children are not dropped off at the sidewalk or parking lot. Every child is brought into the center by their caregivers. Stalls along the front of the building are typically reserved for this function, the peak time of which is 7-10 AM and 3:30 – 6:30PM. The time of stall occupancy is fairly short, typically 5-10 minutes maximum. New Horizon Academy has extensive experience understanding its parking needs along with other data to support our design. First, the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual has established three separate calculation metrics: · a rate of 0.24 spaces per student, Using 0.24 X 150 students = 36 parking stalls · An average of 2.45 stalls per 1,000 SF = 11,750 SF gross X 90% = 10,575 SF net/1,000 = 10.6 X 2.45 = 26 parking stalls · an average of 1.22 spaces per employee = 25 X 1.22 = 31 parking stalls Averaging these three factors yields a parking stall count of 31 stalls, less than the 42 stalls we are proposing. Second, New Horizon Academy has commissioned a traffic study of their existing East Apple Valley center of a similar occupant load (168 vs 150 here), to provide empirical evidence of the licensed occupant load calculations and their impact on parking. Please see attached traffic study. Following are the actual peak hour and 14-hour total traffic trip generation for a typical week at the existing centers of similar size and design: Page 136 of 221 - 7 - Rylaur, LLC 14 Pheasant Lane North Oaks, MN 55127-2512 612-868-3636 The following chart summarizes the density of use of the parking lot from the East Apple Valley center from 5:30 - 7:30: From this study, the maximum number of occupied parking spaces at any given time was 24, occurring at 8:00 AM during the morning peak. Further New Horizon Academy has tied the employment at any given time to occupant load factors and parking demands for employees. Please see attached letter referencing employment and parking. Finally, there is plenty of regional justification for a lower standard. First, this site is well served by public transit, whereas East Apple Valley is not, and we expect a larger percentage of mass transit users, both staff and families, at this location. Second, Rylaur has designed over 120 childcare centers around the city and country, and offers the following examples of parking densities for similarly designed and managed facilities in suburban locations: Page 137 of 221 - 8 - Rylaur, LLC 14 Pheasant Lane North Oaks, MN 55127-2512 612-868-3636 This analysis suggests an average of 4.14 occupants per stall, meaning our 42-stall parking lot could support 174 occupants, matching our planned capacity of 174 staff and children at 100% occupancy. As you can see from this comparative study, we are right in line with regional evidence and experience, providing more parking than other codes and traffic standards would allow. Based upon this evidence from three separate source calculations, we respectfully request the parking determination as acceptable to meet our planned demand. EASEMENT ADJUSTMENTS Since this site was originally part of a larger planned development, easements covering roughly 10% of the site area were created. Most of these easements are workable, however two adjustments to easements are required. Figure 6: Lot 2 Pond Access Easement Adjustments Page 138 of 221 - 9 - Rylaur, LLC 14 Pheasant Lane North Oaks, MN 55127-2512 612-868-3636 First, there is an existing access easement over the south and east parking lot to enable the City to access the pond on Lot 2 (shown in green, Figure 4). The east parking lot is being removed and replaced with preschool play areas. We request a portion of this easement be vacated (red), and the current easement extended to our new surmountable curb line (blue), illustrated as follows: Second, there is a utility easement across the south parking lot connecting to Brooklyn Boulevard, containing water and sewer (green, Figure 5). However, when constructed, the sewer line ended up taking a slightly different route, ending up outside the easement (yellow). We request to vacate that portion of the easement devoid of utilities (red), and relocate an easement over the existing sewer line (blue), illustrated as follows: Figure 7: Adjustment requested to sewer line easement NEXT STEPS New Horizon Academy, as a long-time employer and childcare service in the city, respectfully requests that: 1) to generally support the development as proposed, including a variance to the full elimination of the front yard parking; and 2) approval of the changes to the utility and access easements as generally described, and 3) to approve the Site Plan and Conditional Use permit as presented. Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions, or need additional information, please advise. END OF SUMMARY REPORT Attachments: New Horizon Traffic Study - Apple Valley, SEH, October 20, 2021 City Submittal Drawing Package Letter from New Horizon Academy describing challenges on finding sites in Brooklyn Center. Page 139 of 221 NEW HORIZON ACADEMY March 18, 2025 The City of Brooklyn Center Attn: Ginny McIntosh, Planning Manager 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 gmcintosh@brooklyncentermn.gov RE: New Horizon Academy Condition Use Permit for 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard Dear Ms. McIntosh: I am writing in response to your request that New Horizon Academy address how we plan to satisfy the Conditional Use Permit Criteria for the new school to be located at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard. Please see the responses to each of the items mentioned in Section 35-7703 of the Unified Development Ordinance: a.The conditional use will be in accordance with the general objectives, or with any specific objective, of the City's Comprehensive Plan and this UDO. NHA Response: We agree to the best of our knowledge and belief b. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. NHA Response: We do not believe our facility to be detrimental or endanger_the public health, safety, morals or comfort. c.The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. NHA Response: We believe our conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. d.The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. NHA Response: We believe our proposed development does not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property. New Horizon Academy• 3405 Annapolis Lane N. • Suite 100 • Plymouth, MN 55447 • (763) 557-1111 • Fax: (763) 383-6101 • newhorizonacademy.net Page 140 of 221 Page 141 of 221 Company Profile New Horizon Academy Our Family Cares About Your Family Page 142 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile2 New Horizon Academy, a Minnesota family-owned and operated company, has been serving young children since 1971. Our founder, Sue Dunkley, began her career as an elementary school teacher. Sue knew she needed to provide a nurturing place for children to go before they ventured out into the big world and entered school, a place that would help them believe in themselves. That is why New Horizon was born. Today, Chad Dunkley, Sue’s son and one of New Horizon Academy’s first students, is our chief executive officer. Chad ensures that the commitment to excellence Sue strived for in New Horizon’s early years and the foundation that our company was built upon continue to be the cornerstone for each New Horizon Academy. Indeed, the entire mission, philosophy, and practices of New Horizon Academy are devoted to that commitment to excellence and the development of a healthy sense of self in every child enrolled in our programs. Because of our continuing love, belief, and dedication to children, we have flourished to become one of the nation’s most successful and respected providers of childcare and early education. As New Horizon Academy continues to grow and serve more families each year, we will always have family roots, a warm atmosphere, an open door, and a commitment to excellence. About Us Page 143 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile 3 Our Mission To open “New Horizons” of self-esteem and potential for the little people entrusted to our care, their families, and our employees by providing and continuously improving the best child development on the planet! Company Highlights We strive to provide the best early childhood experiences for young children, building their confidence so they can become capable and resilient lifelong learners. But beyond our classrooms, we care about all children. We fight to ensure all children have access to high-quality early learning experiences in their most critical time of brain development. Our Vision Page 144 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile4 Our Values Page 145 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile 5 Company Milestones 2000s 1970s Founded by Susan and William Dunkley, New Horizon Nursery School opens. 2010s We continue our commitment to innovation and create the farm-to-table program for our schools. We are one of the first childcare organizations to make a commitment to the Partnership for a Healthier America. 1990s Our commitment to excellence continues with our acquisition of several schools in Idaho and the operation of 47 schools in Minnesota. Our schools earn accreditation from the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). Our first onsite corporate school opens in Securian. A New Horizon “I believe each and every child deserves a new horizon.” - Susan Dunkley, Founder 1980s We are the first school to use sign language in infant classrooms to enhance communication and language development. 2018 We expand into the Iowa market by opening our downtown Des Moines school. 2019 We open another school in Boise, Idaho, by forming a partnership with The Salvation Army. 2019 Colorado expansion begins with opening our Centennial school. 2020 We continue to expand in Iowa and form a partnership with Pella Corporation. 2022 Nationwide expansion continues, and we open our first property in Kansas. Today We continue to thrive as one of the most successful and respected childcare providers. We currently operate over 100 nationally accredited schools in Minnesota, Idaho, Iowa, Colorado, and Kansas. All of our eligible schools are nationally accredited and many have earned the highest rating from QRIS programs. 2017 Most Admired CEO “We provide the best possible learning environment for children during their most formative years.” - Chad Dunkley, CEO Page 146 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile6 “New Horizon Academy has been a trusted partner in the care and education of my children. I am thankful that I can drop my children off and leave with peace-of-mind that they are safe and well cared for every day! The curriculum is top notch. I am always amazed at what my children have learned.” - Rachel M., Parent at New Horizon Academy Our Leadership Team It is not an average mission to provide the best child development on the planet, but New Horizon Academy is not an average company. New Horizon Academy is an exceptional organization with an abiding commitment to excellence in every aspect of the programs and services we provide. We have a very strong and consistent leadership team. In fact, since 1971, our company has had only two CEOs. The founder and current president remains actively involved in the strategic direction and mission of the organization, and that consistent leadership provides a firm foundation from which we continue to flourish. All of our senior leaders have at least 10-20 years of industry experience, and many of our senior leaders have been with New Horizon Academy for over 20 years. Most of our directors have been with us for a decade or more. Page 147 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile 7 About Chad Dunkley, Chief Executive Officer A passionate and published leader, speaker, and advocate, Chad Dunkley drives the strategy and culture of continuous improvement at New Horizon Academy. After earning a juris doctor degree from William Mitchell College of Law, Chad followed his mom’s footsteps into early care and education. He says the moment he held his infant son in his arms, he knew there was no more important work than providing the best early education programs for young children and their families. Throughout his career, Chad has earned international recognition as a leader. Chad was named a Most Admired CEO by the Minneapolis/ St. Paul Business Journal (2017) and an Exceptional Emerging Leader by the Child Care Information Exchange (2015). In 2004, the Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal recognized Chad as one of the region’s most outstanding leaders as one of their Forty Under 40 award recipients. Chad is co-chair of The Early Care and Education Consortium (ECEC), a nonprofit alliance representing over 7,000 multi-site and multi-state childcare programs nationally. Chad is also president of the Minnesota Child Care Association (MCCA), an executive board member of the Chad Greenway Lead the Way Foundation, and a board member of the Minnesota Business Partnership. Chad also completed a four- year term on the governing board of The National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) in 2017. Page 148 of 221 Leadership Team New Horizon Academy Company Profile8 Penny Allen Chief Financial Officer Penny serves as the chief financial officer for New Horizon Academy and Kinderberry Hill. In this role, Penny provides strategic leadership for the company’s business and finance functions, as well as for the management of its financial and capital resources. She oversees the areas that provide critical business functions including purchasing, payroll, financial reporting, accounts receivable and payable, revenue reporting and financial systems. Penny works collaboratively with all departments to help carry out the company’s mission of continuous improvement. Penny is a certified public accountant and received a B.A. in business administration from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She began her career in public accounting, and prior to joining the company in 1994 worked in various accounting and finance roles. Penny was recognized in 2018 as a CFO of the Year honoree from the Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal. Jill Dunkley Executive Vice President and General Counsel Jill serves as the chief legal officer and the executive vice president for New Horizon Academy. She provides advice and counsel to all departments within the organization, including overseeing a broad range of legal issues, real estate matters, regulatory matters, employment, acquisitions, and reputational risks. Prior to joining New Horizon Academy, Jill was an attorney with Dunkley and Bennett, P.A., where her primary practice areas included corporate, real estate, securities, mergers and acquisitions, employment, and a variety of commercial transactions. Jill received her juris doctor degree from William Mitchell College of Law and a bachelor’s degree in international studies from Hamline University. Jill actively supports philanthropic events that are focused on improving the lives of children. Page 149 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile 9 Jessie Watson Regional Vice President Jessie is responsible for all aspects of successful school operations in our multi-state market and employer-sponsored schools. She began her career at New Horizon Academy as a preschool teacher in 1990. After earning a BA in child psychology from the University of Minnesota, Jessie advanced to a director role before being promoted to district manager overseeing a district in Minnesota. As New Horizon Academy’s commitment to growth and expansion developed, Jessie was again promoted to regional vice president. As a previous validator, assessor, and presenter with NAEYC, Jessie remains closely involved with the national accreditation process. Jessie currently conducts NAEYC training for New Horizon Academy employees and participates in NAEYC’s Large System User Group. She is a member of and is on the Policy and Advocacy committee for the Early Childhood Education Association in Colorado. Kelly Ashton Regional Vice President Kelly has been with New Horizon Academy since 1987. She began her career as a preschool teacher, followed by director and district manager. Now as regional vice president for New Horizon Academy, Kelly oversees all school operations in Minnesota for over 60 programs, 6 districts and district managers, and over 1,000 employees. She has been on the board for Minnesota Childcare Association (MCCA) for over 20 years and acts as the conference chair for that organization, organizing two conferences a year open to all licensed childcare programs in Minnesota. She is a previous validator for both the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) and the National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA). Kelly received her BS degree in home economics from the University of Nebraska. Page 150 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile10 Cara Johnson-Bader Vice President of Marketing and Parent Experiences Cara Johnson-Bader is the vice president of marketing and parent experiences at New Horizon Academy. Cara is focused on enhancing the engagement of current and prospective families. Cara is responsible for corporate brand strategy, traditional and digital marketing, media and creative strategy, parent communication, as well as data analytics and business intelligence strategy. Cara joined New Horizon Academy in 2010 as director of parent experiences. She was promoted to vice president of marketing and parent experiences in 2017. Since then, Cara has led several initiatives to further the omnichannel marketing message of New Horizon Academy including a new website and best-in-class, modern digital marketing strategies to advance the organization’s reputation as a leader in the early childhood care and education industry. Cara has created and hosts a podcast called “Parenting Pickup,” and she is a featured columnist for Idaho Family Magazine, where she shares advice on everything from parent-child relationships to children’s behavior and parenting styles. Cara holds a B.A. from St. Catherine University. When not at work, Cara enjoys being the mother of two highly active boys who are themselves New Horizon Academy alumni. Carol Luo Vice President of Human Resources Carol joined New Horizon Academy in 2022 as the vice president of human resources. In this role, Carol leads the full-cycle human resources function supporting the operations of our schools in all markets. Carol believes in the power of relationships and leads through the lens of diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging. She has a passion in developing people and strives to find collaborative ways to bridge intercultural differences. Prior to joining New Horizon Academy, Carol held key leadership positions across several industries: health care, consulting, manufacturing, commercial real estate, luxury hospitality, and non-profit. Carol brings to New Horizon Academy twenty years of extensive experience in all areas of HR. She holds a bachelor’s degree in human resource management, a master’s degree in industrial relations, and a globally-recognized Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR) certification. Carol is bilingual and speaks Mandarin Chinese. Carol enjoys volunteering in her community. She has served as commissioner at the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Commission of Golden Valley City Council, and co-chaired the DEI Committee of the Parent Association Board at her daughter’s school. Page 151 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile 11 “I was the director at a non profit center for about three years prior to NHA acquiring our program. At the time, I thought I loved my job and my staff were happy. We were terrified of NHA taking over. Turns out, it was the most amazing thing that could have happened to me, my staff, and families! There was so much support and communication throughout the transition! We had no idea what we were missing out on with our prior company! Fully stocked classrooms, a corporate office support team, and upper management that cared about my school and staff! I am still with NHA, now a District Manager, and am so grateful that my staff and I were able to stay with such an amazing company!” - Angie Omeilianchuk, District Manager Bev Bauman Vice President of Staff Development and Education Bev has been with New Horizon Academy since 1989 and has held many positions focusing on curriculum development and implementation, organizing professional development classes and conferences, all while overseeing the education team and early childhood mental health specialists. She previously served as the department chair of the early child program at Rasmussen College. Bev is a graduate of Moorhead University with a BS degree in elementary education and has a master’s degree in educational leadership. Her passion includes training New Horizon Academy and Kinderberry Hill employees on the many aspects of the early childhood field. Clare Sanford Vice President of Government and Community Relations Clare joined New Horizon Academy in 2015 and also serves as government relations chair for the Minnesota Child Care Association. As an advocate and lobbyist, she works to increase childcare access, quality, and affordability for young children, families, and the professionals who support them. She began her career teaching in a high-poverty elementary school in Houston, Texas, an experience that spurred her to learn more about the macro issues affecting low-income children and families in our society. Since then, she has held varied positions in the government, philanthropic, and non-profit sectors, all focused on young children and vulnerable families. Clare was recognized in 2018 with a Women in Business award from the Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal, and in 2019 as an Exchange Leader by Child Care Exchange magazine’s leadership initiative. Clare received her BA from St. Olaf College and her MPP from Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government. Page 152 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile12 Jonathan Thomas Vice President of Information Technology Jonathan Thomas has over twenty years of experience as a senior IT leader and program manager with multiple Fortune 200 companies. Joining New Horizon Academy in 2019, Jonathan brings experience successfully delivering mission- critical multimillion-dollar projects, developing high-performing teams, and leading diversity and inclusion efforts. Jonathan holds multiple technical and project management industry certifications. Jonathan has three children and four grandchildren, is a certified life coach, and leads mentorship and community outreach programs. John Rosen Vice President of Real Estate Development John joined New Horizon Academy in January of 2019 as vice president of real estate development. John leads the company’s effort to identify and secure new markets and site opportunities. In the 30 years John has been in the childcare industry, he has been involved in the development of over 250 schools and acquisitions of nearly 100 operating school businesses. Prior to joining New Horizon Academy, John was vice president of real estate and development for Primrose School Franchising Company where he managed the full real estate development function across the county. Primrose delivered 130 new schools during John’s time with the company. From 1990 through 2003, John was executive vice president of real estate services for ARAMARK Educational Resources where he was responsible for real estate development, financing, lease and asset administration, purchasing, and facilities and fleet management. During John’s time at AER, the company grew from 400 to 650 schools. John attended the University of Denver where he obtained a BS in real estate and construction management. Heidi Pross Senior Director of Construction and Facilities Heidi joined New Horizon Academy in June 2021 with over 30 years of experience in the design and construction of commercial buildings ranging from retail to material handling to jet engine testing facilities. As the senior director for construction and facilities for all New Horizon Academy and Kinderberry Hill locations, it is her responsibility to ensure that we have safe and clean facilities for our teachers and children. She brings her knowledge of the design and construction industry to continuously improve the energy-efficiency, cost, and aesthetic of our spaces. She has a degree in architectural engineering from Penn State and an MBA from the University of St. Thomas. Page 153 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile 13 “The teachers, environment, and curriculum are absolutely wonderful! We are continually impressed by all the teachers and all that our son is learning! We love New Horizon Academy! - Valentia G., Parent at New Horizon Academy Page 154 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile14 Why We’re Unique Commitment to Our Employees New Horizon Academy has been named a Top Workplace for six consecutive years and leads the industry in compensation and benefits. We retain the best early childhood educators by offering a 401(k) match, employer-sponsored health insurance, 50 percent off childcare tuition, paid time off, educational reimbursement and scholarships, and advancement opportunities. Commitment to Accreditation At New Horizon Academy, 100 percent of our eligible programs are accredited by the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC), the recognized gold standard in the field of early care and education. This is an accomplishment we are very proud of, and we are confident that no other provider of our size has achieved this same recognition. Highest Quality Rating New Horizon Academy is proud to receive the highest rating possible from each state’s quality rating and improvement system. Achieving the highest-quality rating means New Horizon Academy excels in essential standards that support quality learning for all children. Page 155 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile 15 “I was worried about the transition from our current school to New Horizon Academy, but our directors and teachers stayed, they [New Horizon Academy] introduced an electronic communication app, new curriculum, and renovated the school. It was an amazing changeover. We liked our previous school, but we are now raving fans of New Horizon Academy. Our family fell in love with the new amenities and support systems. Way to go New Horizon Academy!” - Juan C., Parent at New Horizon Academy Quality Education Programs Our thoughtfully planned education programs are designed to meet the specific needs of the children enrolled in our schools. We currently use Creative Curriculum paired with the Teaching Strategies Gold Assessment process so parents can be actively engaged in their child’s growth and development. Creative Curriculum uses child-initiated learning focusing on the child’s interests, strengths, and learning styles. Creative Curriculum is a researched- based curriculum based on developmentally appropriate practices to enhance the learning in the classroom. Our goal is to help children become independent, self-confident, inquisitive learners. Teaching Strategies GOLD is the assessment tool that links with Creative Curriculum, which ensures parents can be actively engaged in their child’s growth and development. We use the Conscious Discipline social and emotional learning system. This multidisciplinary approach creates a sense of belonging, uses connection to teach self-regulation skills, and engages positive emotions to reduce stress and create an atmosphere of caring, encouragement, and meaningful contributions. Page 156 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile16 In addition, SEEDS and Character Education are intertwined with the Creative Curriculum daily. SEEDS helps children develop the social, emotional, language, and literacy skills children need to be ready for kindergarten. Beginning at birth, interactions are the medium for all character development. As children grow, they are shaped and influenced in fundamental ways by the quality of interactions they experience with key adults in their lives. Our new Character-Building Curriculum is designed around six important pillars of character: Trustworthiness, Respect, Responsibility, Fairness, Caring, and Self- Discipline. These lessons are weaved into daily activities to help prepare your child to develop these critical skills. Innovative Partnerships Yale University We have partnered with Yale University on an evaluation of our menus, nutritional guidelines and practices, and other aspects of our food program to ensure the healthiest options are available to our children. Harvard Business School Harvard Business School analyzed the potential return on investment with the St. Paul Scholarship Model at our New Horizon Academy school on Rice Street in St. Paul, Minnesota. Page 157 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile 17 “Change is hard, but New Horizon Academy hosted meet and greet events, sent continuous communication, and helped ensure a smooth transition. We have enjoyed the updates and upgrades and are excited about an upcoming facility renovation and new playground.” - Deshawn J., Parent at New Horizon Academy University of Minnesota We have partnered with the University of Minnesota Child Development Institute on a research project to evaluate the development of mindful thinking skills in young children. New Horizon Academy has also partnered with the University of Minnesota Center for Early Education and Development (CEED) to implement the SEEDS of School Readiness Emergent Literacy Curriculum in all New Horizon Academy classrooms. Minnesota Department of Health We participated in a Minnesota Department of Health pilot program called Learning About Nutrition Through Activities (LANA), which helped identify strategies for incorporating more fruits and vegetables into a young child’s diet. Partnership for a Healthy America New Horizon Academy partnered with the Partnership for a Healthier America and the Let’s Move campaign to promote healthier practices and to actively work to provide solutions to our nation’s increase in childhood obesity. Excellence in Customer Service Our mission is one of continuous improvement, and each year, we survey our families to gather their feedback. We consistently receive high scores on communication, curriculum, and learning progress. 98% of families recommend New Horizon Academy to friends, families, and co-workers. Commitment to Social Responsibility Giving back is foundational to our mission. We aspire to go above and beyond to make a positive impact in the lives of children, their families, our employees, and our community. We do this through our Caring Beyond the Classroom program. Our Caring Beyond the Classroom program helps children cultivate a lifelong commitment to service by offering activities, events, and opportunities that promote kindness and giving—all while promoting social responsibility, positive citizenship, empathy, and compassion. Dedication to Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging As a company that prepares children to reach their fullest potential, we are committed to nurturing a more diverse and inclusive generation of young children where inclusion, acceptance, and belonging are recognized and practiced, where respect and fairness are the building blocks of our programs, and where children and employees know that when they are with us, they are safe, respected, and valued. Page 158 of 221 “The peace of mind it provides to me as a parent. Every day, I know I am sending my child to a place that provides good, healthy meals, structure, and an environment with individualized curriculum focused on helping her develop both intellectually and emotionally (e.g. how to deal with big feelings, share, etc). The teachers work tirelessly, support each other, and also genuinely care about my child. They are teaching her far more than I would be able to on my own. My daughter truly loves going to school. I am endlessly grateful for New Horizon!” - Parent at New Horizon Academy Page 159 of 221 New Horizon Academy Company Profile 19 A Culture of Health and Wellness At New Horizon Academy, we are committed to promoting a culture of wellness. To accomplish this goal, we provide a wide variety of health and wellness programs to support all employees—healthy snacks and meals, a walking program, an employee life assistance program, a financial education program for our educators, and so much more! Advocacy The leaders of our organization participate in several events to make childcare and the ECE field top of mind for our federal and state leaders. We are consistently finding ways for our leadership, as well as our staff and families, to advocate for investments in both the field and for our families. Page 160 of 221 November 2024 (763) 557-1111 info@nhacademy.net www.newhorizonacademy.netContact: The Best Decision You Can Make for Your Child Home Office: 3405 Annapolis Lane North Suite 100 Plymouth, MN 55447 Page 161 of 221 Page 162 of 221 Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110-3507 651.490.2000 | 800.325.2055 | 888.908.8166 fax | sehinc.com SEH is 100% employee-owned | Affirmative Action–Equal Opportunity Employer MEMORANDUM TO: Heidi Pross, Senior Director of Construction & Facilities – New Horizon Academy John Rosen, Vice President of Real Estate Development – New Horizon Academy FROM: Erin Jordan, PE (IA, MN, WI) Leo Johnson, EIT DATE: October 20, 2021 RE: New Horizon Academy Traffic Study - Apple Valley Facility SEH No. NHOAC 163219 14.00 BACKGROUND New Horizon Academy has requested that data be collected at the existing Apple Valley, MN facility located at 14088 141st St W. This facility has an approximate 10,700 gross floor area (GFA) and a student capacity of 172. The data would determine trips generated and parking required for a prototypical, approximately 85% occupied New Horizon Academy Facility. The purpose is to use this study as part of the approval process for the development of future New Horizon Academy projects and determine a specific parking generation rate for New Horizon Academy facilities. This memorandum provides a summary of the trips entering and exiting the daycare during a weekday, parking lot utilization for buses, parents, and staff, and drop-off/pick-up parking space occupancy times. On the day of data collection (Tuesday, September 14th, 2021), the facility was operating at approximately 83% occupancy with 143 students and there were 23 staff members in attendance. Based on information provided by New Horizon Academy, a facility is considered operating at a very high-capacity utilization at 85% occupancy; it is rare to have a facility 100% occupied. DATA COLLECTION Trip Generation On Tuesday, September 14th, 2021, turning movements entering and exiting the daycare were collected at the west driveway along 141st St W and the south driveway along Upper 141st St W from 5:30 AM to 7:30 PM. The peak hours of activity were found to be from 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM and from 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM. Table 1 summarizes the entering and exiting trips from the development during the peak hours and the 14-hour total. Table 1 – Entering and Exiting Volumes (2021) Time Period Entering Exiting Total AM (7:15 - 8:15 AM) 61 56 117 PM (4:30 - 5:30 PM) 54 64 118 Daily (14-hr total) 259 259 518 Figure 1 also shows the turning movements into and out of the daycare during the AM and PM peak hours as well as the 14-hour totals. The Attachment includes the raw turning movement count data for the 14-hour period. Note: Traffic Study Conducted for Existing New Horizon Academy (Apple Valley) — Data Generated Intended for Establishing Baseline Parking and Traffic Needs for Prototypical, 85% Occupied New Horizon Academy Page 163 of 221 2021 Existing Conditions 140th St W Upper 141st St W 14 1 s t S t W 1 2 Project: NHOAC 163219 Figure 1New Horizon Academy, Apple Valley StudyMap by: ljohnson Projection: NAD 1983 HARN Dakota Source: ESRI Print Date: 10/4/2021 Apple Valley, MN Pa t h : X : \ K O \ N \ N H O A C \ 1 6 3 2 1 9 \ 5 - f i n a l - d s g n \ 5 1 - d r a w i n g s \ 9 0 - G I S \ T r a f f i c \ F i g u r e 1 - 2 0 2 1 E x i s t i n g C o n d i t i o n s . m x d I Speedway Driveway 14 1 s t S t 1 30 / (32) / [139] 2 / (2) / [10] 0 / (0) / [1] 3 / ( 4 ) / [ 2 1 ] 43 / ( 4 0 ) / [ 1 7 6 ] !"$West Driveway= >OP ³3 / (1) / [8] Upper 141st St So u t h D r i v e w a y 2 1 / (3) / [17] 13 / ( 9 ) / [ 5 2 ] 11 / ( 2 1 ) / [ 5 7 ] 11 / (6) / [37] !"$> =>= Intersection ID Turning MovementsOP X !"$Minor Street Stop Control XX / (XX) / [XX] AM Peak Hour Volume (7:15 - 8:15 AM) PM Peak Hour Volume (4:30 - 5:30 PM) Daily Volumes Page 164 of 221 New Horizon Academy Traffic Study October 20, 2021 Page 3 Parking Lot Occupancy Parking data was processed every 15 minutes during the peak pick up and drop off hours and every 30 minutes during non-peak periods. Parking data was collected by observing two traffic cameras filming the parking lot activity. There is a total of 31 parking spaces, including two accessible parking spaces and two school bus parking spaces. Figure 2 shows the parking lot occupancy from 5:30 AM to 7:30 PM for buses, staff, and parent activity. Figure 2 - Parking Lot Occupancy The maximum parking spaces occupied during the day was 24 spaces, which occurred at 8:00 AM. Once the PM pick-up period began, the maximum parking spaces occupied was 23 spaces, which occurred at 4:00 PM. These totals include the spaces occupied by school buses and staff and indicate that the current parking lot provides adequate capacity for the site. Duration of Parking Space Occupancy The amount of time vehicles were parked during the AM peak (drop-off) and PM peak (pick-up) times was measured from when the vehicle came to a stop in a parking space until the vehicle began exiting the parking space. Parking times were collected from video of the parking spaces in the northeast section of the parking lot between the daycare entrance and the daycare bus parking area, which was observed to have the highest pick-up/drop-off activity in the parking lot. The west and southeast portions of the parking lot were found to be used primarily by employees who parked for the day. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 5: 3 0 A M 6: 0 0 A M 6: 3 0 A M 7: 0 0 A M 7: 3 0 A M 8: 0 0 A M 8: 3 0 A M 9: 0 0 A M 9: 3 0 A M 10 : 0 0 A M 10 : 3 0 A M 11 : 0 0 A M 11 : 3 0 A M 12 : 0 0 P M 12 : 3 0 P M 1: 0 0 P M 1: 3 0 P M 2: 0 0 P M 2: 3 0 P M 3: 0 0 P M 3: 3 0 P M 4: 0 0 P M 4: 3 0 P M 5: 0 0 P M 5: 3 0 P M 6: 0 0 P M 6: 3 0 P M 7: 0 0 P M 7: 3 0 P M Oc c u p i e d P a r k i n g S p a c e s Time Buses Staff Parents Total Available Parking Spaces (31) Page 165 of 221 New Horizon Academy Traffic Study October 20, 2021 Page 4 AM Peak Hour (Drop-off) · The average occupancy time was for 4 minutes 28 seconds · The median time was 5 minutes 59 seconds · The fastest a parent occupied a space was for 1 minutes 15 seconds · The slowest a parent occupied a space was for 7 minutes 40 seconds PM Peak Hour (Pick-up) · The average parent occupied a parking space for 6 minutes 10 seconds · The median time was 3 minutes 56 seconds · The fastest a parent occupied a space was for 1 minutes 43 seconds · The slowest a parent occupied a space was for 11 minutes 37 seconds Between the two peak hours, the average time a parent occupied a parking stall was 5 minutes and 19 seconds and the average median time was 4 minutes and 58 seconds. Table 2 shows the drop-off and pick-up parking space occupancy data. Table 2 – Duration of Parking Space Occupancy Count Drop-Off Parking Space Occupancy Time Pick-Up Parking Space Occupancy Time 1 0:07:03 0:07:12 2 0:06:17 0:03:32 3 0:03:39 0:11:37 4 0:02:54 0:05:55 5 0:03:17 0:06:02 6 0:05:52 0:06:17 7 0:06:38 0:09:41 8 0:03:29 0:05:59 9 0:03:30 0:03:21 10 0:02:55 0:07:53 11 0:05:29 0:05:08 12 0:03:01 0:04:21 13 0:03:45 0:11:04 14 0:03:49 0:07:58 15 0:05:05 0:04:00 16 0:05:17 0:06:43 17 0:07:40 0:07:47 18 0:03:47 0:08:28 19 0:04:04 0:04:04 20 0:06:22 0:05:13 21 0:02:29 0:03:38 22 0:07:32 0:04:17 23 0:07:06 0:01:43 24 0:02:47 25 0:02:58 26 0:05:44 27 0:03:14 28 0:01:15 29 0:03:34 30 0:03:56 31 0:04:17 32 0:04:38 33 0:04:13 Page 166 of 221 New Horizon Academy Traffic Study October 20, 2021 Page 5 PARKING GENERATION ITE Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) conducts parking demand research and routinely publishes the findings and data in its Parking Generation Manual. This manual is one of the most used and accepted tools among traffic engineers to estimate parking demand for land uses. The ITE Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition includes data for a Day Care Center and parking generation rates based on size of the facility, number of employees, and number of students. Table 3 summarizes the estimated parking generation using the ITE rates, assuming a 100% occupied Apple Valley facility with 27 employees and 172 students as a conservative approach. Table 3 – ITE Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition Day Care Center – 100% Occupied Units (X) 1,000 SF GFA Employees Students Quantity 10.7 27 172 Rate (Stalls per X) 2.45 1.22 0.24 Parking Generation 26 33 41 New Horizon Academy Parking Generation The data collected at this New Horizon Academy facility revealed the parking demand specific to New Horizon Academy facilities. Mirroring the units provided in the ITE Parking Generation Manual, three parking generation rates were calculated based on the maximum parking occupancy (24), the size of the facility (10,700 SF), and number of employees (23) and students in attendance (143) on the day of observation. Rates were calculated using the following equations: 1,000 SF GFA Rate ÷ 1,000 = 24 ÷ 10,700 1,000 = !.!# 1,000 Employees Rate ÷ $ % & % ' ( ) = 24 ÷ 23 % = +.,# % Students Rate ÷ & % ' ( ) = 24 ÷ 143 = ,.+- Table 4 summarizes the New Horizon Academy specific parking generation using the calculated rates, assuming a 100% occupied facility with 27 employees and 172 students as a conservative approach. Table 4 – New Horizon Academy Parking Generation New Horizon Academy – 100% Occupied Units (X) 1,000 SF GFA Employees Students Quantity 10.7 27 172 Rate (Stalls per X) 2.24 1.04 0.17 Parking Generation 24 28 29 As shown in Tables 3 and 4, the ITE parking generations are comparable to the New Horizon Academy parking generations, with the ITE parking generation showing slightly higher demand. ITE best practices and engineering judgment recommends utilizing site-specific data whenever possible to determine parking generation for similar land uses to achieve the most appropriate designs. Page 167 of 221 New Horizon Academy Traffic Study October 20, 2021 Page 6 Using the New Horizon Academy parking generation rates, the recommended number of parking stalls recommended for a New Horizon Academy facility should be based on the maximum parking generation among the three units and for 100% occupancy. For example, the facility in Apple Valley requires a maximum of 29 parking stalls when the site is at 100% student capacity, which is accommodated with the available 31 parking stalls. It is recommended that planning efforts use the New Horizon Academy specific parking generation rates determined in this memo (see Table 4) to help define the number of parking stalls required for maximum capacity at future facilities. Attachments: · Turning Movement Counts c: Scott Blank, AIA-SEH x:\ko\n\nhoac\163219\8-planning\87-rpt-stud\final new horizon academy traffic study - apple valley facility memo_101521.docx Page 168 of 221 Attachment - Turning Movement Counts Page 169 of 221 Location: Count Date: Counted By: Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Int. Total 5:30 1 000000000000000 1 5:45 0000000000000000 0 6:00 1 000001 0000001 00 3 6:15 5 000002 000000000 7 6:30 3 000001 0001 00000 5 6:45 5 0000150001 001 00 13 7:00 8 000004 0001 00000 13 7:15 9 000007 0001 001 00 18 7:30 11 000019000000000 21 7:45 11 0000150002 00000 19 8:00 12 000009 0000002 00 23 8:15 7 0000150001 00000 14 8:30 3 000114000000000 9 8:45 2 000003 000000000 5 9:00 5 000002 000000000 7 9:15 4 0000031001 00000 8 9:30 0000001 0001 00000 2 9:45 1 000001 000000000 2 10:00 0000001 0000001 00 2 10:15 0000000000000000 0 10:30 0000000000000000 0 10:45 0000000000000000 0 11:00 1 000000000000000 1 11:15 0000001 0001 00000 2 11:30 0000011000000000 2 11:45 000001 0000000000 1 12:00 2 000001 000000000 3 12:15 1 000000000000000 1 12:30 0000002 0001 00000 3 12:45 0000001 000000000 1 13:00 0000001 000000000 1 13:15 00000000000001 00 1 13:30 0000000000000000 0 13:45 0000001 000000000 1 14:00 1 000000000000000 1 14:15 0000000000000000 0 14:30 1 000000000000000 1 14:45 0000001 000000000 1 15:00 00000000001 00000 1 15:15 3 000003 000000000 6 15:30 0000002 000000000 2 15:45 8 000001 0001 00000 10 16:00 5 000008 0002 00000 15 16:15 11 0000150001 00000 18 16:30 10 0000170000001 00 19 16:45 12 0000010 0001 00000 23 17:00 8 0000011 0001 00000 20 17:15 10 0000140002 00000 17 17:30 7 000005 000000000 12 17:45 7 000008 0001 00000 16 18:00 1 000002 000000000 3 18:15 0000001 000000000 1 18:30 0000000000000000 0 18:45 0000000000000000 0 19:00 0000000000000000 0 19:15 0000000000000000 0 Total1760001101391002100800 354 Cars+172000191350002000800 345 Trucks4000014100100000 10 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 2.9 100.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0% Trucks New Horizon Apple Valley West Driveway 9/14/2021 LJ TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT DATA 141st St West Driveway 141st St Speedway Driveway Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound All Vehicles 2.82.3 3.3 4.8 0.0 Page 170 of 221 Location: Count Date: Counted By: Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Int. Total 5:30 0000000000001 000 1 5:45 0000000000000000 0 6:00 001 0000000000000 1 6:15 1 0 1 0001 000001 000 4 6:30 0000001 000001 000 2 6:45 1 0 2 0001 000003 000 7 7:00 3 0 2 0002 000002 000 9 7:15 2 0 3 0000000003 000 8 7:30 3 0 4 0000000002 000 9 7:45 3 0 1 0001 000004 000 9 8:00 3 0 5 0000000002 000 10 8:15 1 0 2 0000000001 000 4 8:30 002 0001 000001 000 4 8:45 001 0001 000000000 2 9:00 3 000000000000000 3 9:15 0000000000000000 0 9:30 0000000000000000 0 9:45 002 0000000000000 2 10:00 0000000000000000 0 10:15 0000000000000000 0 10:30 0000000000000000 0 10:45 0000000000000000 0 11:00 0000000000000000 0 11:15 0000000000000000 0 11:30 0000000000001 000 1 11:45 0000000000000000 0 12:00 0000000000000000 0 12:15 1 000001 000000000 2 12:30 0000000000000000 0 12:45 0000000000001 000 1 13:00 0000000000000000 0 13:15 002 0000000000000 2 13:30 0000000000000000 0 13:45 1 000000000000000 1 14:00 0000000000000000 0 14:15 0000000000001 000 1 14:30 002 0001 000000000 3 14:45 0000001 000000000 1 15:00 1 0 1 0000000001 000 3 15:15 001 0000000000000 1 15:30 0000000000000000 0 15:45 001 0001 000001 000 3 16:00 1 0 3 0000000004 000 8 16:15 2 0 4 0000000000000 6 16:30 4 0 3 0000000001 000 8 16:45 4 0 3 0001 000003 000 11 17:00 4 0 1 0002 000001 000 8 17:15 9 0 2 0000000001 000 12 17:30 5 0 1 0002 000001 000 9 17:45 5 0 1 0000000000000 6 18:00 001 0000000000000 1 18:15 0000000000000000 0 18:30 0000000000000000 0 18:45 0000000000000000 0 19:00 0000000000000000 0 19:15 0000000000000000 0 Total57052000170000037000 162 Cars+54052000160000035000 157 Trucks3000001000002000 6 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0% Trucks New Horizon Apple Valley South Driveway 9/14/2021 LJ TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT DATA South Driveway Upper 141st St 0 Upper 141st St Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound All Vehicles 3.72.8 5.9 0.0 5.4 Page 171 of 221 S89°42'00"W 230.72 S0 0 ° 1 8 ' 0 0 " E 16 4 . 9 8 N 3 6 ° 4 7 ' 3 0 " W 3 2 . 7 2 1 7 2 . 0 2 Δ = 0 ° 2 5 ' 5 1 " R = 2 2 8 7 6 . 3 2 351.96 N89°42'00"E 49 . 9 95.3 65 . 0 80.1 6. 9 3.1 7.73.1 7. 0 N36° 2 6 ' 0 4 " W 13.5 6 1 3 2 . 1 3 Δ = 1 ° 0 9 ' 3 8 " R = 6 5 2 3 . 9 4 326.15 28.20 202.52 RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com PROJECT INFORMATION: CLIENT INFORMATION: Sheet No NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 7100 BROOKLYN BLVD. BROOKLYN CENTER NEW HORIZON ACADEMY ANAPOLIS AVE PLYMOUTH, MN SHEET TITLE: Drawn By: VJH Project Architect: Drawing History/Revisions: Drawing Date: Checked By: APH 03.11.2025 A. PETER HILGER, AIA 2025 RYLAUR, LLCC A001 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 1 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" 17 Stalls @ 9'-0" each Trash Bldg RENOVATED CHILDCARE CENTER Infant Yard 42 PARKING STALLS RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com PROJECT INFORMATION: CLIENT INFORMATION: Sheet No NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 7100 BROOKLYN BLVD. BROOKLYN CENTER NEW HORIZON ACADEMY ANAPOLIS AVE PLYMOUTH, MN SHEET TITLE: Drawn By: VJH Project Architect: Drawing History/Revisions: Drawing Date: Checked By: APH A. PETER HILGER, AIA 2025 RYLAUR, LLCC SITE DEMO KEYNOTES DEMOLISH TRASH ENCLOSURE NEW ACCESS POINT VIA EASEMENT WITH NEW SURMOUNTABLE CURB1 # A TERMINATE, ABANDON & REMOVE THIS HYDRANTB DEMOLISH EXISTING CURBING AS INDICATED IN BLUEC EXISTING PARKING STALLS OMITTED AS INDICATED IN BLUED DEMOLISH BANK TELLER ISLAND IN ITS ENTIRETYE DEMOLISH EXISTING TREES & APPLICABLE BUSHES, ETC. AS INDICATED IN BLUE REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR FULL REMOVAL SCOPE F DEMOLISH EXISTING CANOPY (PERIMETER BLDG OVERHANG TO REMAIN)G DEMOLISH NIGHT DEPOSIT BOX REFER TO SHEET A201 FOR FACADE RENOVATIONH OMIT STRIPPED ACCESS AISLE & HC PARKING SIGNS & STALLS AT THIS LOCATIONI 1 4 S t a l l s @ 9 ' E a 45'-0" 1 1 ' - 4 " 16'-0 " 4 2 19 17 A B C C C C C C C E D D D D D D FFFFF FF F G H I RELOCATE EXISTING LIGHT POLE (Qnty = 3) SEE KEYNOTE #13 FOR NEW LOCATIONSJ J J J ABANDON THIS EASEMENT AND ACCESS POINT SURFACE TO DRAIN SOUTHK K NEW PARKING LOT CURBING2 NEW PARKING STALLS3 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 DEMOLISH EXISTING MONUMENT SIGNL L NEW MONUMENT SIGN SEE 2/A0014 4 5 NEW ENTANCE CANOPY & PILLARS5 NEW BLACK METAL PICKET PLAY YARD FENCE INDICATED ON PLANS AS6 7 NEW BLACK METAL PICKET PLAY YARD FENCE ONTOP OF 12" wide FLAT CONC. CURB EDGING - SEE 9/A0027 30 7 7 INSTALL FENCE AROUND EXISTING ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER8 8 NEW OUTDOOR STORAGE BUILDING SEE 5/A001 10 11 12 NEW ENCLOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE BUILDNG w/CONC. APRONS - SEE 4/A00112 REPLACE EXISTING RAILNG ONTOP OF EXISTING STAIRWELL WALL w/NEW BLACK METAL PICKET FENCE9 9 11 10 EXISITNG GENERATOR TO REMAIN REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR NEW PLANTINGS RELOCATED LIGHT POLE AS INDICATED ON PLANS SEE PHOTOMETRICS PLAN13 13 13 13 SITE PLAN KEYNOTES# NEW CONC. SIDEWALK14 14 14 14 14 NEW HARDSCAPE IN TODDLER PLAY YARD (CONC.)15 15 16 NEW HARDSCAPE IN PRESCHOOL PLAY YARD (CONC.)16 INFANT PLAY YARD 565 TOTAL SF @ 35 SF PER CHILD = 16 CHILDREN w/ FALLZONE AREA = 380 SF / HARDSCAPE = 185 SF 17 TODDLER PLAY YARD 3630 TOTAL SF @ 75 SF PER CHILD = 48 CHILDREN w/ FALLZONE AREA = 2635 SF / HARDSCAPE = 995 SF 18 PRESCHOOL PLAY YARD 6300 TOTAL SF @ 75 SF PER CHILD = 84 CHILDREN w/ FALLZONE AREA = 4885 SF / HARDSCAPE = 1415 SF 19 17 Toddler Yard18 Preschool Yard19 PASSIVE PLAY YARD GATE20 EXIT PLAY YARD GATE w/PANIC HARDWARE21 2020 21 21 SITE STATISTICS BASMENT LEVEL AREA = 1866 sf MAIN LEVEL AREA = 6062 sf UPPER LEVEL AREA =6065 sf TOTAL BUILDING AREA = 13,993 sf PARKING STALLS = 42 Stalls Strg EXISTING PORTION OF CONC. SIDEWALK TO REMAIN. PROTECT DURING CONSTRUCTION22 18'-0"24'-0"18'-0" 18 ' - 0 " 27 ' - 7 " ± 18 ' - 0 " 19 Stalls @ 9'-0" each F 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 7 5' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 12'-0"6 7 6 1414Existing Sidewalk to Remain REMOVE EXISTING FLAG POLEM M 26 REMOVE EXISTING SIDEWALK ON THIS PROPERTYN N 22 NEW EXIT DOOR w/STOOP23 23 23 232323 EXISTING EXTERIOR DOOR TO REMAIN24 24 24 EXISTING BASEMENT EXIT - DOOR & STAIRWELL TO GRADE TO REMAIN25 25 20 BICYCLE PARKING DERO HITCH OR SIMILAR - SEE 1/A00226 14 ILLUMINATED EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED SIGN 65 SF27 PAVMENT STRIPPING FOR PUBLIC WAY CROSSING28 28 2 22 27 NEW SIDEWALK OUT TO PUBLIC WAY w/ADA CURB RAMPS29 29 THIS 152'-0" long FENCE LENGTH TO BE 6'-0" PVC FULL SCREEN FENCE - REFERENCE 10/A002 NEW BLACK PVC SCREEN WALL FENCE ONTOP OF 12" wide FLAT CONC. CURB EDGING - SEE 10/A00230 30 30 7001 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER, MN SHEET INDEX A001General Sheets CONSULTANT INDEX Client COVER SHEET & SITE DETAILS NEW HORIZON ACADEMY HEIDI PROSS 3405 ANNAPOLIS LANE NORTH SUITE 100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 P: 763-383-6216 Email: hpross@nhacademy.net Architect RYLAUR, LLC A. PETER HILGER, AIA 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612-868-3636 Email: philger@rylaur.com Photometrics C0.0C0.1 TITLE SHEET PROJECT NOTES 3.11.2025 City Submittal C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN CIVIL DETAILS SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS CIVIL DETAILS CIVIL DETAILS SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS C3.0 GRADING PLAN UTILITY PLANC4.0C5.0C5.1C5.2SW1.0SW1.1SW1.2SW1.3 SWPPP - NARRATIVE SWPPP - DETAILS A002 SITE DETAILS Landscape Design SIMONET DESIGN CARMEN SIMONET, PLA P: 651-695-0273 Email: carmen@simonetdesign.com Civil Engineer CIVIL SITE GROUP DAVID KNAEBLE 5000 GLENWOOD AVENUE GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 P: 763-234-7523 Email: dknaeble@civilsitegroup.com STEEN ENGINEERING, INC. JOHN ALSETH STEEN ENGINEERING 5430 DOUGLAS DRIVE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55429 P: 763-235-4796 Email: johna@steeneng.com Civil Sheets C2.0 SITE PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LOWER LEVEL BASEMENT PLANA100 A200A201A202 Architectural Sheets MAIN GRADE LEVEL PLANA101 UPPER LEVEL PLANA102 L1 LANDSCAPE PLAN Landscape Sheets BUILDING SECTIONSA301 BUILDING SECTIONSA302 L2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L3 LANDSCAPE NOTES Page 172 of 221 T/Monument Sign 6'-0" T/Cap 2'-0" Grade BRICK VENEER T/Footing See Struct T/Parapet 10'-11" T/Cap 2'-10" T/Parapet 10'-11" Floor Slab T/Stone 2'-10" T/Service Dr 7'-4" T/Parapet 10'-11" T/Stone 2'-10" Pavement Roll Up Dr 8'-0" T/Rear Wall CMU 10'-0" Trash Encl Conc. Slab T/Footing See Struct8" high x 8" thick CONC. BLOCK FOUNDATION WALL PER STRUCTURAL CONC. APRON ON COMPACTED BASE PITCH AWAY FROM BLDG PAVEMENT CONC. TRASH ENCLOSURE SLAB, SLOPED TO FRONT SEE STRUCTURAL T/Front Wall CMU 10'-0" T/Stone 2'-8" T/Masonry Opening 7'-4" 2 x 8 RAFTERS - SEE STRUCTURAL EXPANSION JOINT CONC FOOTING PER STRUCTURAL COVER RIGID INSULATION w/METAL CAP FLASHING & RUN UP CMU WALL BEHIND BRICK ASSEMBLY 2" RIGID INSULATION TO PREVENT STONE HEAVING PERIMETER BRICK WAINSCOT HORIZONTAL METAL SIDING 15 COURSES 8" high x 8" thick CMU BLOCK WALL 2 x 10 LEDGER T/Parapet 10'-11" 1' - 0 " METAL COPING TO EXTEND DOWN AND OVER TOP OF CMU RIB TREATED 2x LEDGER w/JOIST HANGER CONNECTION SEE STRUCTURAL U-SHAPE METAL SCUPPER w/DRIP LIP Trash Enclosure 8" 1' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " O v e r h e a d D o o r M . O . INSTALL INSULATION CRICKETS SLOPING TO REAR SCUPPER INSTALL INSULATION CRICKETS SLOPING TO REAR SCUPPER METAL CAP FLASHING OVER TOP BRICK (3) TREATED TOP PLATES ALONG REAR METAL COPING TO EXTEND DOWN TO & OVER CMU RIBBED FACADE PLANE TREATED 2 x 6 INTERIOR BUCKS BOND BEAM COURSE Trash Enclosure RM 001 180 sf Roofed Outodoor Storage RM 002 120 sf © RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com PROJECT INFORMATION: CLIENT INFORMATION: Sheet No NEW HORIZON ACADEMY ANAPOLIS AVE PLYMOUTH, MN SHEET TITLE: Drawn By: VJH Project Architect: Drawing History/Revisions: Drawing Date: Checked By: APH 03.11.2025 A. PETER HILGER, AIA 2025 RYLAUR, LLCC A002 SITE DETAILS 6 LOWER LEVEL BASEMENT PLAN TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATION Project Architect: C 7 TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"8 TRASH ENCLOSURE REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" 3 TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"4 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" 2 MONUMENT SIGN SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 5 OUTDOOR STORAGE PLAN SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" 3 A002 3 A002 6 A002 5 A002 7 A002 7 A002SIM 5 A002 SIM 7 A002 SIM 3 A002 1 BIKE RACK SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" DERO "HITCH" BIKE RACK OR SIMILAR (1) BIKE RACK - SEE A/A001 FOR LOCATION 3 A002 METAL HORIZONTAL SIDING METAL CAP FLASHING METAL ROOF COPING METAL OVERHEAD DOOR BRICK WAINSCOT TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDING GALVANIZED STEEL DOOR SCUPPER OPENING CONC. FILLED STEEL BOLLARDS 10 SCREEN FENCE SCALE: N.T.S. 9 PICKET FENCE SCALE: N.T.S. BLACK METAL PICKET FENCE & MATCHING PLAY YARD GATES 6' - 0 " T a l l A b o v e G r a d e BLACK PVC HORIZONTAL SCREENWALL PRIVACY FENCE 6' - 0 " T a l l A b o v e G r a d e Page 173 of 221 S89°42'00"W 230.72 S0 0 ° 1 8 ' 0 0 " E 16 4 . 9 8 N 3 6 ° 4 7 ' 3 0 " W 3 2 . 7 2 1 7 2 . 0 2 Δ = 0 ° 2 5 ' 5 1 " R = 2 2 8 7 6 . 3 2 351.96 N89°42'00"E 49 . 9 95.3 65 . 0 80.1 6. 9 3.1 7.7 3. 1 7. 0 2 Story Brick Sided Building Foundation Area = 6,127 +/- Sq. Ft. Existing Building Existing Building Bituminous Parking Lot Bituminous Parking Lot Bituminous Parking Lot Bi t u m i n o u s P a r k i n g L o t B i t u m i n o u s P a t h B i t u m i n o u s P a t h ( A P u b l i c R / W ) B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D ( C O U N T Y R O A D N O . 1 5 2 ) 12" P V C 6" PVC 12" PVC 33 " R C P 2 7 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 27" RCP (Per Rec.) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 15" R C P (Per R e c . ) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" W M ( P e r R e c . ) 11 1 5 5 8 10 19 7 2 5 M o n u m e n t S i g n Concrete Steps Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y [A] Concrete Walkway Crosses Property Line A c c e s s Generator Water Service (Per Rec.) Concrete Chain Link Fence [B] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line [C] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line Trash Enclosure Landscaping Rock C o l u m n O v e r h a n g Ov e r h a n g Ov e r h a n g Concrete Retaining Wall Edge of Woods Edge of Wo o d s Edge of Woods Edge of Woods Edge of Ice Edge of Ice [13] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Doc. No. 5122813 [12], [13] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Doc. Nos. 5036941 and 5122813 [ 1 6 ] H i g h w a y E a s e m e n t P e r D o c . N o . 8 6 6 0 1 2 7 [14] Vehicular Parking Easement Per Doc. No. 5268706 [17] Access Easement Per Doc. No. 11188033 Pond PID: 2711921320004 Address: Unassigned Owner: Brooklyn Ctr Meth Ch PID: 2711921320058 Address: 4513 71st Ave N Owner: Amy Yang PID: 2711921320059 Address: 4507 71st Ave N Owner: Gorpu Daniels/James Gbanjah PID: 2711921320060 Address: 4501 71st Ave N Owner: T Christensen/R Chistensen PID: 2711921320061 Address: 4419 71st Ave N Owner: W R Lindig & K S Lindig PID: 2711921320062 Address: 4413 71st Ave N Owner: James Campbell PID: 2711921330080-2711921330096 Address: Multiple Owner: Multiple PID: 2711921330097 Address: 7100 Brooklyn Blvd PID: 2711921330098 Address: Unassigned Owner: City of Brooklyn Center Found 1/2 Inch Open Iron Pipe Found Nail W/ Flagging Found 1/2 Inch Iron Pipe W/ Illegible Cap Found Rebar Overhang ( P l a t = 3 2 . 7 5 ) (Plat=230.80) ( P l a t = 1 7 1 . 9 7 ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) N36° 2 6 ' 0 4 " W 13.5 6 1 3 2 . 1 3 Δ = 1 ° 0 9 ' 3 8 " R = 6 5 2 3 . 9 4 N 3 7 ° 3 5 ' 4 2 " W 6 0 . 4 8 8" P V C Sanitary Service (Per Rec.) 326.1525.81 28.20 202.52 [13 ] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y Eas e m e n t P e r D o c . N o . 512 2 8 1 3 [ 1 2 ] , [ 1 3 ] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y E a s e m e n t P e r D o c . N o s . 5 0 3 6 9 4 1 a n d 5 1 2 2 8 1 3 [13] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Doc. No. 5122813 [13] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Doc. No. 5122813 [12], [13] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Doc. Nos. 5036941 and 5122813 [ 1 5 ] S i d e w a l k E a s e m e n t p e r D o c . N o . 6 6 7 8 1 1 8 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 1, Block 1, 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition, as platted and recorded. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property GENERAL SURVEY NOTES 1. Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (1986 Adjustment). 2. Elevations are based on the NGVD 29 Datum. Site Benchmark is the top nut of the fire hydrant located on the northeasterly side of Brooklyn Boulevard, approximately 27 feet northeast from the northwest corner of the subject property, as shown hereon. Elevation = 869.78. 3. We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from the following sources: plans obtained from utility companies, plans provided by client, markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources. We have used this information to develop a view of the underground utilities for this site. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY NOTES (numbered per Table A) 1. Monuments placed and/or found at all major corners of the boundary of the surveyed property as shown hereon. 2. Site Address: 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55429. 3. This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0204F, effective date of November 4, 2016. 4. The gross land area is 48,095 +/- square feet or 1.104 +/- acres. Right of Way Easement Area= 4,397 +/- square feet or 0.101 +/- acres. Total Area Minus Right of Way= 43,698 +/- square feet or 1.003 +/- acres. 7. (a) Exterior dimensions of buildings at ground level as shown hereon. (b)(1) Square footage of exterior footprint of buildings at ground level as shown hereon. 8. Substantial features observed in the process of conducting the fieldwork as shown hereon. Please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observed all site features located on the subject property. 9. The number of striped parking stalls on this site are as follows: 61 Regular + 3 Handicap = 64 Total Parking Stalls. 13. The names of the adjoining owners of the platted lands, as shown hereon, are based on information obtained from the Hennepin County Interactive Property Map. SURVEY REPORT 1. This map and report was prepared with the benefit of a Loan Policy of Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services, Commitment No. NCS-1250338-KCTY, Date of Policy: February 2, 2025. We note the following with regards to Schedule B II Exceptions of the herein referenced Proforma: a. Item no.'s 1-11 and 18-21 are not survey related. b. The following are numbered per the referenced Title Commitment: [12]. Drainage and utility easements as shown on the recorded plat of 7100 Corporate Plaza, recorded September 27, 1985, as Document No. 5036941. Easements are located around the perimeter of the subject property, as shown hereon. [13]. Drainage and utility easements as shown on the recorded plat of 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition, recorded June 24, 1986, as Document No. 5122813. Easements are located around the perimeter and a middle portion of the subject property, as shown hereon. [14]. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, obligations and easements as contained in Declaration dated March 18, 1987, filed May 15, 1987, as Document No. 5268706. Document creates an easement for vehicular parking and for constructing, repairing, and maintaining an asphalt parking surface with the benefit to Lot 1 Block 1, 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition. Easement is located over the Easterly 3 feet of Lot 2 Block 1, 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition, as shown hereon. [15]. Terms, conditions and easement for sidewalk purposes, including any incidental rights, in favor of the City of Brooklyn Center, a Minnesota municipal corporation, as contained in Easement/Agreement for Sidewalk Maintenance and Liability, dated June 7, 1985, recorded December 26, 1996, as Document No. 6678118. This easement covers the westerly 8 feet of the subject property as shown hereon. [16]. Terms, conditions and easement for highway purposes, including any incidental rights, in favor of the County of Hennepin, as contained in Final Certificate - Parcel Nos. 29, 30, 31, and 32, dated September 22, 2005, filed September 23, 2005, as Document No. 8660127. Document creates a highway easement located over the southwesterly portion of the subject property, a shown hereon. [17]. Terms, conditions and easements, including any incidental rights, in favor of the City of Broolkyn Center, a Minnesota municipal corporation, as contained in Access Easement and Utility Facilities Agreement, dated March 16, 2023, recorded March 16, 2023, as Document No. 11188033. Access easement benefiting Lot 2, Block 1, 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition, is located through the middle portion of the subject property, as shown hereon. 2. Conflicts such as (but not limited to): encroachments, protrusions, access, occupation, and easements and/or servitudes: [A]. Concrete walkway crosses the north line of the subject property, as shown hereon. [B]. Chain link fence crosses the north line of the subject property, as shown hereon. [C]. Chain link fence crosses the east line of the subject property, as shown hereon. ALTA CERTIFICATION To: 7100 Brooklyn Blvd LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company; New Horizon Real Estate Development 6, LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership; First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2021 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 7(a), 7(b)(1), 8, 9, and 13 of Table A thereof. The fieldwork was completed on 1-31-2025. Dated this 5th day of February, 2025. ________________________________________________________ Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565 rory@civilsitegroup.com VICINITY MAP 71 0 0 B r o o k l y n B o u l e v a r d Br o o k l y n C e n t e r , H e n n e p i n C o u n t y , M i n n e s o t a 5 5 4 2 9 14 P h e a s a n t L a n e , N o r t h O a k s , M i n n e s o t a 5 5 1 2 7 Ry l a u r , L L C PR O J E C T PROJECT NO.: 25020.00 COPYRIGHT 2025 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION V1.0 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 4-3-2025 Update Title Commitment . . . . . . . . . . N 44565 RORY L. SYNSTELIEN LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 2-5-2025 N CL I E N T civilsitegroup.com QA/QC FIELD CREW DRAWN BY REVIEWED BY UPDATED BY DP/MG DS CJ . OVERHEAD UTILITIES GASMAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER FIBER/COMM. LINE ELECTRIC LINE (RECORD) WATERMAIN ELECTRIC LINE GASMAIN (RECORD) CHAINLINK FENCE LINE Linetype & Symbol Legend CONCRETE SURFACE PAVER SURFACE BITUMINOUS SURFACE GRAVEL/LANDSCAPE SURFACE IRON FENCE LINE GUARDRAIL WATERMAIN (RECORD) SANITARY SEWER (RECORD) STORM SEWER (RECORD) FIBER/COMM. LINE (RECORD) TELEPHONE LINE (RECORD) TELEPHONE LINE SIGNSANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE CABLE TV BOX TELEPHONE MANHOLE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE BOX TRAFFIC SIGNAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER WATER MANHOLE WATER VALVE AIR CONDITIONER BOLLARD CATCH BASIN ELECTRIC MANHOLE GAS VALVE FLAG POLE HANDICAP SYMBOL FOUND IRON MONUMENT HYDRANT CAST IRON MONUMENT SET OR TO BE SET IRON MONUMENT FLARED END SECTION POWER POLE UTILITY MANHOLE GUY WIRE CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE ROOF DRAIN SEWER CLEAN OUT FIRE CONNECTION WELL UTILITY VAULT POST INDICATOR VALVE GAS MANHOLE HAND HOLE FIBER/COMM. MANHOLE MAIL BOX FUEL TANK ELECTRICAL OUTLET SB SOIL BORING LIGHT POLE ACCESS RESTRICTION WOODEN FENCE LINE SATELLITE DISH BUSH/SHRUB 40102001020 SCALE IN FEET Page 174 of 221 FIRE TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 2025 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 3/11/25 CITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT MANAGER DAVID KNAEBLE CONTACT NUMBER 763-234-7523 DRAWN BY BB REVIEWED BY DK PROJECT NUMBER 25020 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 34 0 5 A N N A P O L I S L A N E N , P L Y M O U T H , M N 5 5 4 4 7 48776 David J. Knaeble LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/11/25 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 OW N E R C0.0 TITLE SHEET NEW HORIZON ACADEMY BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA SITE LOCATION MAP N ISSUED FOR: CITY SUBMITTAL 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. 4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 5. CIVIL SITE GROUP SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER FOR ANY COSTS ARISING OUT OF THE CLIENTS DECISION TO OBTAIN BIDS OR PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION BEFORE CIVIL SITE GROUP HAS ISSUED FINAL, FULLY-APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ALL PRELIMINARY PLANS ARE SUBJECT TO SUBSTANTIAL REVISION UNTIL PLANS ARE FULLY APPROVED AND ALL PERMITS ARE OBTAINED. SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C0.0 TITLE SHEET C0.1 PROJECT NOTES C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN C2.0 SITE PLAN C3.0 GRADING PLAN C4.0 UTILITY PLAN C5.0 CIVIL DETAILS C5.1 CIVIL DETAILS C5.2 CIVIL DETAILS SW1.0 SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS SW1.1 SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS SW1.2 SWPPP - DETAILS SW1.3 SWPPP - NARRATIVE PROJECT CONTACTS NAME & ADDRESS CONTACT CIVIL ENGINEER CIVIL SITE GROUP 5000 GLENWOOD AVE GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 DAVE KNAEBLE 612-615-0060 DKNEBLE@CIVILSITEGROUP.COM PROPERTY OWNER ARCHITECT RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 A. PETER HILGER 612-868-3636 PHILGER@PHILGER@RYLAUR.COM SURVEYOR CIVIL SITE GROUP 5000 GLENWOOD AVE GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 RORY SYNSTELIEN 612-615-0060 X 712 RORY@CIVILSITEGROUP.COM GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TBD TBD REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION Know what's below. before you dig.Call R NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 3405 ANNAPOLIS N, SUITE 100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 HEIDI PROSS 763-383-6216 HPROSS@NHACADEMY.NET SITE LOCATION TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM Page 175 of 221 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 2025 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 3/11/25 CITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT MANAGER DAVID KNAEBLE CONTACT NUMBER 763-234-7523 DRAWN BY BB REVIEWED BY DK PROJECT NUMBER 25020 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 34 0 5 A N N A P O L I S L A N E N , P L Y M O U T H , M N 5 5 4 4 7 48776 David J. Knaeble LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/11/25 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 OW N E R C0.1 PROJECT NOTES REMOVAL NOTES: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER REMOVAL NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES. 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 3. REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 4. REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 5. EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS. 6. REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 7. ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS. 8. EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. 9. PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 10. MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. FOR ANY WORK ON ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER PRIOR TO ANY WORK. 11. DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 12. PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 13. SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 14. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 15. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 16. SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 17. STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 18. ALL EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC/REGULATORY SIGNAGE TO BE INVENTORIED AND IF REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TO LGU. 19. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SITE LAYOUT NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS & ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. 6. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 7. CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. 9. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL. 10. CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. 11. SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL. 12. ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 14. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS. 15. PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 16. ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP. 17. BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 18. ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS. 19. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO INSTALL ANY SIDEWALK AND CURBING PER DESIGN PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL CURBS AND SIDEWALKS WILL DRAIN PROPERLY IN FIELD CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEER 24-HOURS PRIOR TO ANY CURB AND/OR SIDEWALK INSTALLATION TO REVIEW AND INSPECT CURB STAKES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CURB OR SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT IF THIS PROCEDURE IS NOT FOLLOWED. GENERAL GRADING NOTES: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER GRADING NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES. 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS, (FFE, LFE, GFE), PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION BY CROSS CHECKING WITH ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL ELEVATIONS FOR EQUIVALENT "100" ELEVATIONS. THIS MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AND INSTALLATION OF ANY FOOTING MATERIALS. VERIFICATION OF THIS COORDINATION SHALL BE CONFIRMED IN WRITING BY CIVIL, SURVEYOR, ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL AND CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 3. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 5. ANY ELEMENTS OF AN EARTH RETENTION SYSTEM AND RELATED EXCAVATIONS THAT FALL WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY WILL REQUIRE A “RIGHT OF WAY EXCAVATION PERMIT”. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AQUIRING THIS PERMIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IF APPLICABLE 6. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 7. GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 8. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 10. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:1. 11. PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES. 13. IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. 14. EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. 15. FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK. 16. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS. 17. TOLERANCES 17.1. THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 17.2. THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 17.3. AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. 17.4. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 18. MAINTENANCE 18.1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. 18.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED. 18.3. WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER UTILITY NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC UTILITY NOTES. REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC SITE NOTES. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R OPERATIONAL NOTES SNOW REMOVAL ALL SNOW SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE OUTSIDE PARKING LOT. WHEN FULL, REMOVAL CO. SHALL REMOVE EXCESS OFF-SITE. TRASH REMOVAL TRASH SHALL BE PLACED IN INTERIOR SOLID WASTE COLLECTION POINT, MOVED TO TEMPORARY EXTERIOR LOCATION ON COLLECTION DAY AND REMOVED BY COMMERCIAL CO. DELIVERIES DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR AT THE FRONT DOOR VIA STANDARD COMMERCIAL DELIVERY VEHICLES (UPS, FED-EX, USPS). 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 4. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. 5. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION. 6. UTILITIES CONNECTIONS ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. 7. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 8. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL. 10. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. 11. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 12. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 13. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED. 14. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 15. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 16. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 17. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 21. FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS 25' IN EACH DIRECTION. SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOW POINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. Page 176 of 221 S89°42'00"W 230.72 S0 0 ° 1 8 ' 0 0 " E 16 4 . 9 8 N 3 6 ° 4 7 ' 3 0 " W 3 2 . 7 2 1 7 2 . 0 2 Δ = 0 ° 2 5 ' 5 1 " R = 2 2 8 7 6 . 3 2 351.96 N89°42'00"E 49 . 9 95.3 65 . 0 80.1 6. 9 3.1 7.7 3. 1 7. 0 2 Story Brick Sided Building Foundation Area = 6,127 +/- Sq. Ft. Existing Building Existing Building Bituminous Parking Lot Bituminous Parking Lot Bituminous Parking Lot Bi t u m i n o u s P a r k i n g L o t B i t u m i n o u s P a t h B i t u m i n o u s P a t h ( A P u b l i c R / W ) B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D ( C O U N T Y R O A D N O . 1 5 2 ) 12" P V C 6" PVC 12" PVC 33 " R C P 2 7 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 27" RCP (Per Rec.) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 15" R C P (Per R e c . ) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" W M ( P e r R e c . ) 11 1 5 5 8 10 19 7 2 5 M o n u m e n t S i g n Concrete Steps Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y [A] Concrete Walkway Crosses Property Line A c c e s s Generator Water Service (Per Rec.) Concrete Chain Link Fence [B] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line [C] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line Trash Enclosure Landscaping Rock C o l u m n O v e r h a n g Ov e r h a n g Ov e r h a n g Concrete Retaining Wall Edge of Woods Edge of Wo o d s Edge of Woods Edge of Woods Edge of Ice Edge of Ice [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y Eas e m e n t P e r P l a t [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [ 1 0 ] H i g h w a y E a s e m e n t P e r D o c . N o s . 7 2 9 1 1 2 4 & 8 6 6 0 1 2 7 [13] Vehicular Parking Easement Per Doc. No. 5268706 [14] Access Easement Per Doc. No. 11188033 Pond PID: 2711921320004 Address: Unassigned Owner: Brooklyn Ctr Meth Ch PID: 2711921320058 Address: 4513 71st Ave N Owner: Amy Yang PID: 2711921320059 Address: 4507 71st Ave N Owner: Gorpu Daniels/James Gbanjah PID: 2711921320060 Address: 4501 71st Ave N Owner: T Christensen/R Chistensen PID: 2711921320061 Address: 4419 71st Ave N Owner: W R Lindig & K S Lindig PID: 2711921320062 Address: 4413 71st Ave N Owner: James Campbell PID: 2711921330080-2711921330096 Address: Multiple Owner: Multiple PID: 2711921330097 Address: 7100 Brooklyn Blvd PID: 2711921330098 Address: Unassigned Owner: City of Brooklyn Center Found 1/2 Inch Open Iron Pipe Found Nail W/ Flagging Found 1/2 Inch Iron Pipe W/ Illegible Cap Found Rebar [ 9 ] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y E a s e m e n t P e r P l a t Overhang ( P l a t = 3 2 . 7 5 ) (Plat=230.80) ( P l a t = 1 7 1 . 9 7 ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) N36° 2 6 ' 0 4 " W 13.5 6 1 3 2 . 1 3 Δ = 1 ° 0 9 ' 3 8 " R = 6 5 2 3 . 9 4 8" P V C Sanitary Service (Per Rec.) 326.15 28.20 202.52 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT AND BASE MATERIAL AND PARKING SIGNS, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING TREE AND ROOT BALL, TYP. FOR ALL FENCE REMOVALS OR PRESERVATIONS ON LOT LINES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM OWNERSHIP OF FENCE PRIOR TO REMOVAL AND COORDINATE WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER. ALL EXISTING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES TO REMAIN (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE). PROTECT FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT & REMOVE PVMTS., CURBS, AND WALKS FOR INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. UPON COMPLETION OF UTILITY WORK, REPLACE ALL MATERIAL, IN KIND. BITUMINOUS MILL & OVERLAY, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT AND BASE MATERIAL AND PARKING SIGNS, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER, TYP. REMOVE FLAG POLE REMOVE STRUCTURE AND FOUNDATIONS REMOVE MONUMENT SIGN AND FOUNDATION EXISTING TRANSFORMER TO REMAIN, PROTECT FROM DAMAGE SAW CUT FULL DEPTH AT REMOVAL LIMITS, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE AND STORM SEWER PIPE SAW CUT FULL DEPTH AT REMOVAL LIMITS, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING CONC. AND BASE MATERIAL EXISTING TRANSFORMER TO REMAIN, PROTECT FROM DAMAGE EXISTING GENERATOR TO REMAIN, PROTECT FROM DAMAGE EXISTING CONC. STAIRS AND WALL TO REMAIN, PROTECT FROM DAMAGE REMOVE EXISTING METAL HAND RAIL REMOVE LIGHT POLE. SALVAGE AS NECESSARY. COORD. W/OWNER AND ELEC'L,TYP. REMOVE LIGHT POLE. SALVAGE AS NECESSARY. COORD. W/OWNER AND ELEC'L,TYP. REMOVE EXISTING HYDRANT BACK TO MAIN GRIND DOWN CONC. SO THAT IT IS FLUSH WITH PROPOSED SIDEWALK REMOVE LANDSCAPE ROCK EX. SAN. MH TO REMAIN. ADJUST CASTING PER PROPOSED GRADES. ROTATE OUT OF PROPOSED CURB LINE. EX. STM. MH TO REMAIN. PROTECT FROM DAMAGE EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, PROVIDE TREE PROTECTION FENCING, TYP. PROTECT EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN, TYP. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, PROVIDE TREE PROTECTION FENCING, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING FENCE AND FOUNDATIONS REMOVE EXISTING FENCE AND FOUNDATIONS CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY IF EXISTING ELECTRIC LINE EXISTS. IF IT EXISTS, RELOCATE AS NECESSARY FOR PROPOSED PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT. COORD. W/UTILITY OWNER. REMOVALS PLAN LEGEND: TREE PROTECTION TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 2025 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 3/11/25 CITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT MANAGER DAVID KNAEBLE CONTACT NUMBER 763-234-7523 DRAWN BY BB REVIEWED BY DK PROJECT NUMBER 25020 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 34 0 5 A N N A P O L I S L A N E N , P L Y M O U T H , M N 5 5 4 4 7 48776 David J. Knaeble LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/11/25 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 OW N E R C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF IN RIGHT-OF-WAY, COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT. SEE SHEET C0.1 FOR GENERAL REMOVAL NOTES SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.3 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: CONSTRUCTION LIMITS REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTIONPROPERTY LINE REMOVAL OF TREES AND VEGETATION INCLUDING STUMPS AND ROOT SYSTEMS 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R OWNER INFORMATION NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 3405 ANNAPOLIS N, SUITE 100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 HEIDI PROSS 763-383-6216 HPROSS@NHACADEMY.NET REMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL, INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS. BITUMINOUS MILL AND OVERLAY Page 177 of 221 S89°42'00"W 230.72 S0 0 ° 1 8 ' 0 0 " E 16 4 . 9 8 N 3 6 ° 4 7 ' 3 0 " W 3 2 . 7 2 1 7 2 . 0 2 Δ = 0 ° 2 5 ' 5 1 " R = 2 2 8 7 6 . 3 2 351.96 N89°42'00"E 49 . 9 95.3 65 . 0 80.1 6. 9 3.1 7. 73.1 7. 0 2 Story Brick Sided Building Foundation Area = 6,127 +/- Sq. Ft. Existing Building Existing Building Bituminous Parking Lot Bituminous Parking Lot Bi t u m i n o u s P a r k i n g L o t B i t u m i n o u s P a t h B i t u m i n o u s P a t h ( A P u b l i c R / W ) B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D ( C O U N T Y R O A D N O . 1 5 2 ) 12" P V C 6" PVC 12" PVC 33 " R C P 2 7 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 27" RCP (Per Rec.) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 15" R C P (Per R e c . ) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" W M ( P e r R e c . ) 5 Concrete Steps Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y [A] Concrete Walkway Crosses Property Line A c c e s s Generator Water Service (Per Rec.) Chain Link Fence [B] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line [C] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line Ov e r h a n g Ov e r h a n g Concrete Retaining Wall Edge of Woods Edge of Wo o d s Edge of Woods Edge of Woods Edge of Ice Edge of Ice [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y Eas e m e n t P e r P l a t [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [ 1 0 ] H i g h w a y E a s e m e n t P e r D o c . N o s . 7 2 9 1 1 2 4 & 8 6 6 0 1 2 7 [13] Vehicular Parking Easement Per Doc. No. 5268706 [14] Access Easement Per Doc. No. 11188033 Pond PID: 2711921320004 Address: Unassigned Owner: Brooklyn Ctr Meth Ch PID: 2711921320058 Address: 4513 71st Ave N Owner: Amy Yang PID: 2711921320059 Address: 4507 71st Ave N Owner: Gorpu Daniels/James Gbanjah PID: 2711921320060 Address: 4501 71st Ave N Owner: T Christensen/R Chistensen PID: 2711921320061 Address: 4419 71st Ave N Owner: W R Lindig & K S Lindig PID: 2711921320062 Address: 4413 71st Ave N Owner: James Campbell PID: 2711921330080-2711921330096 Address: Multiple Owner: Multiple PID: 2711921330097 Address: 7100 Brooklyn Blvd PID: 2711921330098 Address: Unassigned Owner: City of Brooklyn Center Found 1/2 Inch Open Iron Pipe Found Nail W/ Flagging Found 1/2 Inch Iron Pipe W/ Illegible Cap Found Rebar [ 9 ] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y E a s e m e n t P e r P l a t Overhang ( P l a t = 3 2 . 7 5 ) (Plat=230.80) ( P l a t = 1 7 1 . 9 7 ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) N36° 2 6 ' 0 4 " W 13.5 6 1 3 2 . 1 3 Δ = 1 ° 0 9 ' 3 8 " R = 6 5 2 3 . 9 4 8" P V C Sanitary Service (Per Rec.) 326.15 28.20 202.52 REF FRZ 24 " 48 " 24" 36" 48.2 NO PA R K I N G 4 S P A C E S @ 9. 0 = 3 6 . 0 2 S P A C E S @ 9 . 0 + 1 AC C E S S I S L E @ 9 . 0 = 2 7 . 0 19 SPACES @ 9.0 = 171.0 17 SPACES @ 9.0 = 153.0 5.0 25.0 5. 0 30 . 0 79 . 6 68.55.0 12.05.029.5 5. 0 5. 0 15 . 5 42.669.5 23. 6 38. 5 48.6 18.0 24.0 18.0 18 . 0 27 . 5 18 . 0 13.4 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 15 . 0 B612 C&G, TYP. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE, INCL. SIGNAGE, STRIPING AND RAMPS. RE-USE SALVAGED SIGNS. FULL BIT. PVMT. RECONSTRUCT, TYP, SEE FINAL GEOTECH FOR THICKNESS TRASH ENCLOSURE, SEE ARCH'L PLANS FOR DETAILS CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO INSTALL ANY SIDEWALK AND CURBING PER DESIGN PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL CURBS AND SIDEWALKS WILL DRAIN PROPERLY IN FIELD CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEER 24-HOURS PRIOR TO ANY CURB AND/OR SIDEWALK INSTALLATION TO REVIEW AND INSPECT CURB STAKES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CURB OR SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT IF THIS PROCEDURE IS NOT FOLLOWED. TODDLER PLAY YARD W/ FALL ZONE MATERIAL, SEE ARCH'L PLANS FOR DETAILS INFANT PLAY YARD W/ FALL ZONE MATERIAL, SEE ARCH'L PLANS FOR DETAILS SECURITY YARD FENCE, SEE ARCH'L PLANS FOR DETAILS, TYP. 48" WIDE GATE, TYP. COORD. W/ARCH'L PRESCHOOL PLAY YARD W/ FALL ZONE MATERIAL, SEE ARCH'L PLANS FOR DETAILS 12" FLUSH CONCRETE CURB 12" FLUSH CONCRETE CURB. CURB TO BE THICKENED ALONG THIS EDGE. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR HEIGHT. 12" FLUSH CONCRETE CURB. CURB TO BE THICKENED ALONG THIS EDGE. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR HEIGHT. MATCH TO EXISTING CURB MATCH TO EXISTING CURB 3' CURB TAPER MATCH EXISTING SIDEWALK, TYP. FULL BIT. PVMT. RECONSTRUCT, TYP, SEE FINAL GEOTECH FOR THICKNESS INSTALL SURMOUNTABLE CURB BITUMINOUS MILL & OVERLAY PVMT. STRIPING, TYP. MONUMENT SIGN. SEE ARCH'L FOR DETAILS 15' ACCESS EASEMENT, COORD. W/CITY GRIND DOWN CONC. SO THAT IT IS FLUSH WITH PROPOSED SIDEWALK ADD RAILING AT TOP OF STAIRS, SEE ARCH'LACCESSIBLE ROUTE ARROW. DO NOT PAINT, FOR CODE REVIEW ONLY, TYP. 3' CURB CUT W/3' TAPERS THICKENED EDGE CONCRETE. SLOPE WALK TO MEET GRADE INSTALL THICKENED EDGE CONC. ALONG PLAY AREA TO ALLOW FOR PLAY SURFACE ATTACHMENT INSTALL THICKENED EDGE CONC. ALONG PLAY AREA TO ALLOW FOR PLAY SURFACE ATTACHMENT B612 C&G, TYP. MATCH EXISTING SIDEWALK 10.0 CROSSWALK STRIPING BIKE POST, SEE ARCH'L COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 2025 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 3/11/25 CITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT MANAGER DAVID KNAEBLE CONTACT NUMBER 763-234-7523 DRAWN BY BB REVIEWED BY DK PROJECT NUMBER 25020 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 34 0 5 A N N A P O L I S L A N E N , P L Y M O U T H , M N 5 5 4 4 7 48776 David J. Knaeble LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/11/25 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 OW N E R SITE PLAN LEGEND: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED. HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGN NP = NO PARKING FIRE LANE ST = STOP CP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY PROPERTY LINE CURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUT GUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLAN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TO ACCESSIBILITY ROUTE ARROW (IF APPLICABLE) DO NOT PAINT. CONCRETE PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETE DEPTHS, WITHIN ROW SEE CITY DETAIL, WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY SEE CSG DETAIL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C2.0 SITE PLAN SEE SHEET C0.1 FOR GENERAL SITE NOTES 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R OWNER INFORMATION NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 3405 ANNAPOLIS N, SUITE 100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 HEIDI PROSS 763-383-6216 HPROSS@NHACADEMY.NET BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE). SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL. BITUMINOUS MILL & OVERLAY FALLZONE MATERIAL Page 178 of 221 S89°42'00"W 230.72 S0 0 ° 1 8 ' 0 0 " E 16 4 . 9 8 N 3 6 ° 4 7 ' 3 0 " W 3 2 . 7 2 1 7 2 . 0 2 Δ = 0 ° 2 5 ' 5 1 " R = 2 2 8 7 6 . 3 2 351.96 N89°42'00"E 49 . 9 95.3 65 . 0 80.1 6. 9 3.1 7. 73.1 7. 0 2 Story Brick Sided Building Foundation Area = 6,127 +/- Sq. Ft. Existing Building Existing Building Bituminous Parking Lot Bituminous Parking Lot Bi t u m i n o u s P a r k i n g L o t B i t u m i n o u s P a t h B i t u m i n o u s P a t h ( A P u b l i c R / W ) B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D ( C O U N T Y R O A D N O . 1 5 2 ) 12" P V C 6" PVC 12" PVC 33 " R C P 2 7 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 27" RCP (Per Rec.) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 15" R C P (Per R e c . ) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" W M ( P e r R e c . ) 5 Concrete Steps Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y [A] Concrete Walkway Crosses Property Line A c c e s s Generator Water Service (Per Rec.) Chain Link Fence [B] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line [C] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line Ov e r h a n g Ov e r h a n g Concrete Retaining Wall Edge of Woods Edge of Wo o d s Edge of Woods Edge of Woods Edge of Ice Edge of Ice [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y Eas e m e n t P e r P l a t [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [ 1 0 ] H i g h w a y E a s e m e n t P e r D o c . N o s . 7 2 9 1 1 2 4 & 8 6 6 0 1 2 7 [13] Vehicular Parking Easement Per Doc. No. 5268706 [14] Access Easement Per Doc. No. 11188033 Pond PID: 2711921320004 Address: Unassigned Owner: Brooklyn Ctr Meth Ch PID: 2711921320058 Address: 4513 71st Ave N Owner: Amy Yang PID: 2711921320059 Address: 4507 71st Ave N Owner: Gorpu Daniels/James Gbanjah PID: 2711921320060 Address: 4501 71st Ave N Owner: T Christensen/R Chistensen PID: 2711921320061 Address: 4419 71st Ave N Owner: W R Lindig & K S Lindig PID: 2711921320062 Address: 4413 71st Ave N Owner: James Campbell PID: 2711921330080-2711921330096 Address: Multiple Owner: Multiple PID: 2711921330097 Address: 7100 Brooklyn Blvd PID: 2711921330098 Address: Unassigned Owner: City of Brooklyn Center Found 1/2 Inch Open Iron Pipe Found Nail W/ Flagging Found 1/2 Inch Iron Pipe W/ Illegible Cap Found Rebar [ 9 ] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y E a s e m e n t P e r P l a t Overhang ( P l a t = 3 2 . 7 5 ) (Plat=230.80) ( P l a t = 1 7 1 . 9 7 ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) N36° 2 6 ' 0 4 " W 13.5 6 1 3 2 . 1 3 Δ = 1 ° 0 9 ' 3 8 " R = 6 5 2 3 . 9 4 8" P V C Sanitary Service (Per Rec.) 326.15 28.20 202.52 REF FRZ 24 " 48 " 24 " 36" NO PA R K I N G CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS INSTALL MNDOT CLASS III RIP RAP AROUND LOW POINT COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 2025 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 3/11/25 CITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT MANAGER DAVID KNAEBLE CONTACT NUMBER 763-234-7523 DRAWN BY BB REVIEWED BY DK PROJECT NUMBER 25020 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 34 0 5 A N N A P O L I S L A N E N , P L Y M O U T H , M N 5 5 4 4 7 48776 David J. Knaeble LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/11/25 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 OW N E R C3.0 GRADING PLAN 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL GRADING PLAN LEGEND: SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTER SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT) EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 41.26 1125 891.00 G 891.00 TC 891.00 BS/TS 1137 EOF=1135.52 TO SPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTING891.00 ME GB GRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS SEE SHEET C0.1 FOR GENERAL GRADING NOTES SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.3 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: CONSTRUCTION LIMITS REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES: 1.PROJECT DISTURBANCE AREA IS LESS THAN 1.0 ACRE, SO NO COMMISSION PROJECT REVIEW IS REQUIRED PER THE SHINGLE CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION AND NO PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS REQUIRED. 2.SINCE THE PROJECT WILL BE REDUCING THE IMPERVIOUS AREA ON SITE, NO RATE CONTROL WILL BE REQUIRED PER THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER. 3.CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER REQUESTS STORMWATER BMP'S BE PROVIDED TO PROVIDE TSS REMOVAL. 4.THIS PROJECT IS UTILZING TWO SUMPED STORM MANHOLES WITH OUTLET HOODS TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED STORMWATER BMP'S TO MEET CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER REQUIREMENTS. Page 179 of 221 S89°42'00"W 230.72 S0 0 ° 1 8 ' 0 0 " E 16 4 . 9 8 N 3 6 ° 4 7 ' 3 0 " W 3 2 . 7 2 1 7 2 . 0 2 Δ = 0 ° 2 5 ' 5 1 " R = 2 2 8 7 6 . 3 2 351.96 N89°42'00"E 49 . 9 95.3 65 . 0 80.1 6. 9 3.1 7. 73.1 7. 0 2 Story Brick Sided Building Foundation Area = 6,127 +/- Sq. Ft. Existing Building Existing Building Bituminous Parking Lot Bituminous Parking Lot Bi t u m i n o u s P a r k i n g L o t B i t u m i n o u s P a t h B i t u m i n o u s P a t h ( A P u b l i c R / W ) B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D ( C O U N T Y R O A D N O . 1 5 2 ) 12" P V C 6" PVC 12" PVC 33 " R C P 2 7 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 27" RCP (Per Rec.) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 15" R C P (Per R e c . ) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" W M ( P e r R e c . ) 5 Concrete Steps Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y [A] Concrete Walkway Crosses Property Line A c c e s s Generator Water Service (Per Rec.) Chain Link Fence [B] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line [C] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line Ov e r h a n g Ov e r h a n g Concrete Retaining Wall Edge of Woods Edge of Wo o d s Edge of Woods Edge of Woods Edge of Ice Edge of Ice [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y Eas e m e n t P e r P l a t [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [ 1 0 ] H i g h w a y E a s e m e n t P e r D o c . N o s . 7 2 9 1 1 2 4 & 8 6 6 0 1 2 7 [13] Vehicular Parking Easement Per Doc. No. 5268706 [14] Access Easement Per Doc. No. 11188033 Pond PID: 2711921320004 Address: Unassigned Owner: Brooklyn Ctr Meth Ch PID: 2711921320058 Address: 4513 71st Ave N Owner: Amy Yang PID: 2711921320059 Address: 4507 71st Ave N Owner: Gorpu Daniels/James Gbanjah PID: 2711921320060 Address: 4501 71st Ave N Owner: T Christensen/R Chistensen PID: 2711921320061 Address: 4419 71st Ave N Owner: W R Lindig & K S Lindig PID: 2711921320062 Address: 4413 71st Ave N Owner: James Campbell PID: 2711921330080-2711921330096 Address: Multiple Owner: Multiple PID: 2711921330097 Address: 7100 Brooklyn Blvd PID: 2711921330098 Address: Unassigned Owner: City of Brooklyn Center Found 1/2 Inch Open Iron Pipe Found Nail W/ Flagging Found 1/2 Inch Iron Pipe W/ Illegible Cap Found Rebar [ 9 ] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y E a s e m e n t P e r P l a t Overhang ( P l a t = 3 2 . 7 5 ) (Plat=230.80) ( P l a t = 1 7 1 . 9 7 ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) N36° 2 6 ' 0 4 " W 13.5 6 1 3 2 . 1 3 Δ = 1 ° 0 9 ' 3 8 " R = 6 5 2 3 . 9 4 8" P V C Sanitary Service (Per Rec.) 326.15 28.20 202.52 REF FRZ 24 " 48 " 24 " 36" NO PA R K I N G CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EX. SANMH EX. RIM=866.47 PR. RIM=866.20 EX. IE=857.90 ROTATE CASTING SO IT IS OUT OF PROP. CURB LINE EX. CBMH EX. RIM=865.18 PR. RIM=865.18 EX 12" IE=861.23 (FIELD VERIFY) PR 12" IE=861.23 CORE DRILL NEW CONNECTION TO EXISTING MH. DRILL CONNECTION FOR DT STUB IN FIELD CB 1 RIM=865.06 IE=861.51 SUMP=857.51 INSTALL HOOD ON OUTLET 28 LF 12" SCH40 STORM @ 1.00% MH 11 RIM=865.63 EX 12" IE (E)=858.58 (FIELD VERIFY) PR 6" IE (W)=859.33 PR 12" IE (S)=859.33 CONSTRUCT MH OVER EXISTING PIPE. DRILL CONNECTION FOR DT STUB IN FIELD. 40 LF 12" HDPE STORM @ 2.50% CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT & REMOVE PVMTS., CURBS, AND WALKS FOR INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. UPON COMPLETION OF UTILITY WORK, REPLACE ALL MATERIAL, IN KIND. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL THE UTILITY SERVICES WITH BOTH THE CIVIL AND MECHANICAL PLANS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SEE DEMO PLAN FOR ALL EXISTING UTILITY REMOVAL INFORMATION 6" PERF. DRAIN TILE. SEE PLAYGROUND PLANS FOR FINAL LAYOUT AND ARCH'L FOR DETAILS, TYP. 6" PERF. DRAIN TILE. SEE PLAYGROUND PLANS FOR FINAL LAYOUT AND ARCH'L FOR DETAILS, TYP. 6" PERF. DRAIN TILE. SEE PLAYGROUND PLANS FOR FINAL LAYOUT AND ARCH'L FOR DETAILS, TYP. 6" DRAIN TILE CLEAN OUT. SEE PLAYGROUND PLANS FOR FINAL LAYOUT AND ARCH'L FOR DETAILS, TYP. 6" DRAIN TILE CLEAN OUT. SEE PLAYGROUND PLANS FOR FINAL LAYOUT AND ARCH'L FOR DETAILS, TYP. 31 LF 6" SOLID SCH40 STORM @ 1.00% 26 LF 6" SOLID SCH40 STORM @ 1.00% 8 LF 6" SOLID SCH40 STORM @ 1.00% CBMH 12 RIM=864.33 IE=860.33 SUMP=856.33 24" NYLOPLAST STRUCTURE WITH 24" DOMED GRATE. INSTALL HOOD ON OUTLET CONNECT TO EXISTING 6" STORM STUB IE=859.64 (FIELD VERIFY SIZE AND INVERT) INSTALL MNDOT CLASS III RIP RAP AROUND LOW POINT 5 LF 6" SOLID SCH40 STORM @ 1.00% COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 2025 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 3/11/25 CITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT MANAGER DAVID KNAEBLE CONTACT NUMBER 763-234-7523 DRAWN BY BB REVIEWED BY DK PROJECT NUMBER 25020 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 34 0 5 A N N A P O L I S L A N E N , P L Y M O U T H , M N 5 5 4 4 7 48776 David J. Knaeble LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/11/25 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 OW N E R UTILITY PLAN LEGEND: CATCH BASIN GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATER MAIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT MANHOLE FES AND RIP RAP SEE SHEET C0.1 FOR GENERAL UTILITY NOTES CONSTRUCTION LIMITS DRAINTILE TRENCH DRAIN REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C4.0 UTILITY PLAN 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R Page 180 of 221 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 2025 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 3/11/25 CITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT MANAGER DAVID KNAEBLE CONTACT NUMBER 763-234-7523 DRAWN BY BB REVIEWED BY DK PROJECT NUMBER 25020 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 34 0 5 A N N A P O L I S L A N E N , P L Y M O U T H , M N 5 5 4 4 7 48776 David J. Knaeble LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/11/25 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 OW N E R C5.0 CIVIL DETAILS REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION ACCESSIBLE PARKING PAVEMENT MARKING N T S NO PARKING NOTE: 1. ADHERE TO ALL STATE & FEDERAL ADA STANDARDS FOR PARKING, PAINT & SIGNAGE. 2. VERIFY AND LAYOUT ALL PAINTED FORMS & STRIPING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 3. SEE PLAN FOR ACTUAL PARKING SPACES LAYOUT 4. ALL PAINT COLORS MUST CONFORM TO STATE AND FEDERAL ADA STANDARDS NO PARKING NO PARKING 4" WIDE PAINTED STRIPING, 45° CROSS STRIPE PATTERN AT 2' O.C. AT ACCESS AISLE FACE OF CURB ADJ. SIDEWALK ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP. SEE GRADING & DETAILS HANDICAP SIGN, CENTERED AT HEAD OF PARKING SPACE AND ACCESS AISLE 2' MIN,. AND 8' MAX. FROM FACE OF CURB HANDICAP PARKING ACCESS AISLE WITH PAINTED 12" HIGH LETTERING OF "NO PARKING" CENTERED TOWARD DRIVE AISLE NO PARKING SIGN CENTERED AT HEAD OF SPACE ON CENTER STRIPE HANDICAP PARKING SPACE WITH PAINTED INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY WITH CONTRASTING SQUARE BACKGROUND, CENTERED TOWARD DRIVE AISLE NOTE: FOR REFERENCE ONLY, USE STANDARD ADA PVMT. PAINT TEMPLATE 6" RADIUS 12" DIAMETER 6" LINE WIDTH FOR FIGURE 6" LINE WIDTH OUTSIDE BORDER 5'-6" SQUARE OVERALL 18" RADIUS "WHEEL" SHAPE PAINTED SYMBOL DIAGRAM 8' MIN. 8' MIN. 8' MIN. PE R C I T Y CO D E 9 6" 3' - 6 " 3' - 6 " 60 " - 6 6 " FR O M P A V E M E N T T O BO T T O M O F S I G N ACCESSIBLE SIGN & CHANNEL POST - LOT LOCATION N T S 1'-6" NOTE: 1. SIGN SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED. 2. BOTTOM OF SIGNS TO BE MOUNTED 60"-66" FROM PARKING GRADE, SEE SIGN POST INSTALLATION DETAIL 3. VERIFY POST PAINT C0LOR WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 14" METAL PLATE WELDED TO BOTTOM OF 6” PIPE GROUT INSIDE OF INNER PIPE ANNULAR SPACE TO 1" FROM TOP ADJACENT PVMT. - MATERIAL VARIES, SEE PLAN & DETAILS SLOPE TOP OF FOOTING AWAY FROM BASE, TYP. 1" SILICONE RUBBER OR ASPHALTIC CAULKING COMPOUND 6" OUTSIDE DIA. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE PAINT 1 COAT ANTI-RUST PRIMER PRIMER 3-3/16", 2 LBS./FT., COMMERCIAL GRADE, GALVANIZED STEEL "CHANNEL" STYLE SIGN POST METAL SIGN(S) ACCORDING TO MN STATE CODE, PROVIDE SHOP DRAWING OF SIGN MODEL GALVANIZED STEEL FASTENER (TYP. OF 2), INCLUDE REINFORCING PLATE AT EACH BOLT LOCATION (3"X3") TRIM POST TO BELOW TOP OF SIGN 6" 14" THICK, COMMERCIAL GRADE THERMOPLASTIC POLYETHYLENE PROTECTIVE SLEEVE, PER IDEAL SHIELD OR SIMILAR. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED. PROVIDE COLOR SELECTION OPTIONS CUT TOP OF POLYETHYLENE SLEEVE TO ACCOMMODATE CHANNEL POST (ON-SITE) COMMERCIAL GRADE CONSPICUITY MARKINGS (TAPE), 3M DIAMOND GRADE SERIES 973, OR SIMILAR COMPACTED AGG., TYP. 6" INSIDE DIA. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE PAINT WITH ANTI-RUST PRIMER CONC. FOOTING, SONOTUBE® FORM RECOMMENDED NO PARKING TO BE USED IN FRONT OF STRIPED ACCESS AISLE 8 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - ALL TYPES N T S "A" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA340B) TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357) "B" BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330B) "C" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASE (MNDOT 3138) COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR MAX. DRY DENSITY) PAVEMENT DESIGN TYPE WEAR (A) BASE (B) AGG.(C) NOTE: IF NO DESIGN IS DEFINED IN ABOVE CHART, SEE GEOTECH REPORT FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTION. IF DESIGN IS DEFINED IN ABOVE CHART, IT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO GEOTECH FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTION. 2 LIGHT DUTY 2.0" 2.0" 8" FINISHED GRADE NOTES: 1. ALL CONCRETE PVMT. ON-SITE SHALL INCLUDE FIBER REINFORCING - 3 LBS./C.Y. CONC. MACRO-FIBERS PER ASTM C1116 2. INSTALLATION SHALL BE CERTIFIED AND IN ACCORDANCE TO AN ON-SITE A.C.I. TECHNICIAN AS SPECIFIED. 3. SEE GEO-TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GROSS WEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. 4. SEE LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR LIMITS OF WALKS. 5. SEE CONCRETE JOINT DETAIL FOR REQUIREMENTS. 6. 1/2" WIDE EXPANSION JOINT AND SEALANT AT ALL CURBS. 7. IF NO DESIGN IS DEFINED IN CHART, SEE GEOTECH REPORT FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTION. 8. IF DESIGN IS DEFINED IN CHART, IT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO GEOTECH FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTION. CONCRETE PVMT./WALK/PAD N T S (PRIVATE PROPERTY) 12" RADIUS, 34" DEPTH TOOLED CONTROL JOINT LIGHT BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO TRAFFIC "A" CONCRETE AS SPECIFIED "B" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE THIS OCCURS ONLY WHERE MULCH MEETS EDGE OF WALK LEAVE TOP OF MULCH DOWN 1" FROM TOP OF WALK PAVEMENT DESIGN TYPE CONC. (A) AGG.(B) 3 LBS. / C.Y. CONC. MACRO-FIBER REINFORCING 1. CURING: 1.1. APPLY CURING COMPOUNDS IMMEDIATELY UPON FINISHING OF CONC. SURFACE. 1.2. ALL CONC. SURFACES SHALL HAVE CURING COMPOUNDS ALLIED PER ASTM C-309. AT 200 S.F. PER GAL. 1.3. ALL CURING COMPOUNDS SHALL BE TYPE 1 (CLEAR) AND CONTAIN ACRYLIC BASED CLASS B RESTRICTED RESIN SOLIDS. 3" 2" 1 WALKS 5"6" CONC. PVMT.7"6" EXPANSION JOINT SEALANT DETAILS N T S NOTES: 1. SEPARATING TAPE OR BACKER MATERIAL REQUIRED TO PREVENT JOINT SEALANT FROM FLOWING INTO SAWCUT, TO SEPARATE NONCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS AND TO PREVENT SEALANT FROM BONDING TO BOTTOM OF RESERVOIR. 2. TOP OF SEALANT WILL BE 1/8" TO 1/4" BELOW TOP OF PAVEMENT. W= WIDTH OF SEALANT RESERVOIR 1/2" MINIMUN 5/8" MAXIMUM EXCEPT FOR 3/4" EXPANSION JOINTS D= DEPTH OF SEALANT 1.0 TO 1.5 TIMES W T= DEPTH OF INTIAL SAWCUT, 1/4 OF THE SLAB THINKNESS FOR PAVEMENT LESS THAN 12" POURED JOINT SEALANT SEPARATING TAPE SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 POURED JOINT SEALANT SEE NOTE 2 BACKER MATERIAL SEE NOTE 1 W D T T W D POURED JOINT SEALANTSEE NOTE 2 BACKER MATERIAL SEE NOTE 1 T W D COMPACTED CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE. SEE SOIL REPORT FOR DEPTH, 6" MIN. EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 3 1. INSTALLATION AND REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO A CERTIFIED, ON-SITE A.C.I. TECHNICIAN AS SPECIFIED. 2. SEE GEO-TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOILS ENGINEER'S PVMT. SECTION REQUIREMENTS. 3. SEE LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR LIMITS OF WALKS. 4. SEE CONCRETE JOINT DETAIL FOR REQUIREMENTS. 5. 1/2" WIDE EXPANSION JOINT AND SEALANT AT ALL CURBS. 6. WIRE MESH AND CHAIRS REQUIRED FOR ALL WALKS OR IN LOCATIONS FOR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. THICKENED EDGE CONC. WALK N T S VA R I E S SE E G R A D I N G PL A N 6" NOTE: COMPACTED SUBGRADE CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE MIN. 6" UNDER CONCRETE (VERIFY W/ SOILS ENGINEER) W1.6 X W1.6 WIRE MESH W/ SPACING CHAIRS. CENTER MESH IN CONC. POUR, ALL DIRECTIONS. (REGARDLESS OF WALK SECTION CONCRETE DETAIL, MESH IS REQ. THROUGHOUT ENTIRE WIDTH OF ALL "THICKENED EDGE" WALKS.) INSTALL ADJ. MULCH OR LAWN 1" FROM TOP OF WALK, WHERE APPLICABLE CONC. PVMT. SECTION - TYP. 5", SEE DETAIL FOR WALK SECTION, VERIFY W/ SOILS ENGINEER ADJACENT PVMT., SEE SITE PLAN FOR LAYOUT, DETAIL FOR SECTION AND VERIFY W/ SOILS ENGINEER. ENSURE WATER FLOWS AWAY FROM ALL INSTANCES OF "THICKENED EDGE WALK". COORDINATE W/ GRADING PLAN FINISH SURFACE, SEE DETAILS FOR SCORING PATTERN AND TEXTURE, VERIFY WITH OWNERCONTROL JOINTS PER SITE PLAN 6" 1" 5" 6 NOTES: 1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10'-0" O.C. +/- 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS, SEE SOILS REPORT N T S SURMOUNTABLE CURB 28" 10-12"17-12" 7" 4" 11 " 16" 12" FACE OF CURB SLOPE GUTTER 3 4" PER 1'-0" TIP OUT CONDITION WHERE SHOWN ON SITE PLAN, MATCH ADJ. PVMT. (MIN. 0.5% SLOPE OUT) 28 " R 12 " R FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE COMPACTED SUB-BASE SOIL COMPACTED CLASS 5 AGG. BASE, COORDINATE WITH SOILS REPORT FOR DEPTH - MIN. 6" ADJ. PVMT. SECTION, SEE DETAILS & PLANS 7 N T S B-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 7" 13 1 / 2 " 6" FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE 3" RADIUS CORNERS 1:3 BATTER SLOPE GUTTER 3/4"/1' 0.5% SLOPE-CONSTRUCT WITH REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER WHERE THE PAVEMENT SLOPES AWAY FROM CURB 1/2" RADIUS 6" 8"12" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUB-BASE, COORD. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL (6" MIN.) COMPACTED SUB-BASE, EXIST. NATIVE OR PER SOILS REPORT NOTE: 1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10'-0" O.C. +/- 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS 1/2" RADIUS 4 12" FINISHED GRADE NOTES: 1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10'-0" O.C. +/- 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS 6" 6" PLAYGROUND CURB N T S ADJ. PVMT. SECTION, OR OTHER MATERIALS, SEE PLAN CONTINUOUS SLOPE CONCRETE "CURB" ADJ. PVMT. SECTION, LAWN, BIT. PVMT., OR OTHER MATERIALS, SEE PLAN COMPACTED CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, SEE SOIL REPORT FOR DEPTH, 6" MIN. COMPACTED SUB-BASE, NATIVE SOIL OR AS PER SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS FINISHED GRADE 7" 5 Page 181 of 221 S89°42'00"W 230.72 S0 0 ° 1 8 ' 0 0 " E 16 4 . 9 8 N 3 6 ° 4 7 ' 3 0 " W 3 2 . 7 2 1 7 2 . 0 2 Δ = 0 ° 2 5 ' 5 1 " R = 2 2 8 7 6 . 3 2 351.96 N89°42'00"E 49 . 9 95.3 65 . 0 80.1 6. 9 3.1 7. 73.1 7. 0 2 Story Brick Sided Building Foundation Area = 6,127 +/- Sq. Ft. Existing Building Existing Building Bituminous Parking Lot Bituminous Parking Lot Bituminous Parking Lot Bi t u m i n o u s P a r k i n g L o t B i t u m i n o u s P a t h B i t u m i n o u s P a t h ( A P u b l i c R / W ) B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D ( C O U N T Y R O A D N O . 1 5 2 ) 12" P V C 6" PVC 12" PVC 33 " R C P 2 7 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 27" RCP (Per Rec.) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 15" R C P (Per R e c . ) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" W M ( P e r R e c . ) 11 1 5 5 8 10 19 7 2 5 M o n u m e n t S i g n Concrete Steps Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y [A] Concrete Walkway Crosses Property Line A c c e s s Generator Water Service (Per Rec.) Concrete Chain Link Fence [B] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line [C] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line Trash Enclosure Landscaping Rock C o l u m n O v e r h a n g Ov e r h a n g Ov e r h a n g Concrete Retaining Wall Edge of Woods Edge of Wo o d s Edge of Woods Edge of Woods Edge of Ice Edge of Ice [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y Eas e m e n t P e r P l a t [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [ 1 0 ] H i g h w a y E a s e m e n t P e r D o c . N o s . 7 2 9 1 1 2 4 & 8 6 6 0 1 2 7 [13] Vehicular Parking Easement Per Doc. No. 5268706 [14] Access Easement Per Doc. No. 11188033 Pond PID: 2711921320004 Address: Unassigned Owner: Brooklyn Ctr Meth Ch PID: 2711921320058 Address: 4513 71st Ave N Owner: Amy Yang PID: 2711921320059 Address: 4507 71st Ave N Owner: Gorpu Daniels/James Gbanjah PID: 2711921320060 Address: 4501 71st Ave N Owner: T Christensen/R Chistensen PID: 2711921320061 Address: 4419 71st Ave N Owner: W R Lindig & K S Lindig PID: 2711921320062 Address: 4413 71st Ave N Owner: James Campbell PID: 2711921330080-2711921330096 Address: Multiple Owner: Multiple PID: 2711921330097 Address: 7100 Brooklyn Blvd PID: 2711921330098 Address: Unassigned Owner: City of Brooklyn Center Found 1/2 Inch Open Iron Pipe Found Nail W/ Flagging Found 1/2 Inch Iron Pipe W/ Illegible Cap Found Rebar [ 9 ] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y E a s e m e n t P e r P l a t Overhang ( P l a t = 3 2 . 7 5 ) (Plat=230.80) ( P l a t = 1 7 1 . 9 7 ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) N36° 2 6 ' 0 4 " W 13.5 6 1 3 2 . 1 3 Δ = 1 ° 0 9 ' 3 8 " R = 6 5 2 3 . 9 4 8" P V C Sanitary Service (Per Rec.) 326.15 28.20 202.52 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION AT ALL DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS. INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING CATCH BASIN BEING REMOVED, TYP. PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 2025 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 3/11/25 CITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT MANAGER DAVID KNAEBLE CONTACT NUMBER 763-234-7523 DRAWN BY BB REVIEWED BY DK PROJECT NUMBER 25020 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 34 0 5 A N N A P O L I S L A N E N , P L Y M O U T H , M N 5 5 4 4 7 48776 David J. Knaeble LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/11/25 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 OW N E R SW1.0 SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER EROSION CONTROL NOTES:SWPPP LEGEND: EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DRAINAGE ARROW SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT 1125 ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. THIS PROJECT IS LESS THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL NOT REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 3. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.3 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. 4. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, MAINTENANCE AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMIT. SWPPP NOTES: 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R Page 182 of 221 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 2025 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 3/11/25 CITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT MANAGER DAVID KNAEBLE CONTACT NUMBER 763-234-7523 DRAWN BY BB REVIEWED BY DK PROJECT NUMBER 25020 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 34 0 5 A N N A P O L I S L A N E N , P L Y M O U T H , M N 5 5 4 4 7 48776 David J. Knaeble LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/11/25 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 OW N E R C5.1 CIVIL DETAILS REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PIPE BEDDING - PVC N T S "BC" DENOTES OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE COARSE FILTER AGG. (MNDOT SPEC. 3149H MODIFIED)MINIMUM 2D+BC+12" D VARIABLE PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN GOOD SOILS PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN GOOD SOILS MIN.=BC+12 BC BC "BC" DENOTES OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE COMPACTED BACKFILL GR A N U L A R B O R R O W (M N D O T S P E C . 3 1 4 9 A MO D I F I E D ) 6" 12 " COMPACTED BACKFILL BE D D I N G FOUNDATION 12 " 6" 4 BASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARD PRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT, OR POURED 8" SLAB REINFORCED WITH 6" x 6" 10/10 MESH 16 " O . C . VARIABLE 27" 112" VA R I A B L E 18" MIN. STORM MANHOLE N T S DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB (BOC) TO CENTER OF PIPE: 4' DIA. MH - 9" IN FROM BOC 5' DIA. MH - 3" IN FROM BOC 6' DIA. MH - 3" BEHIND BOC 7' DIA. MH - 9" BEHIND BOC 8' DIA. MH - 15" BEHIND BOC COVER SHALL BE STAMPED "STORM SEWER" METAL SEWER CASTING - REFER TO STRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR TYPE MIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTING RINGS. GROUT BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING, AND ALONG OUTSIDE. PRECAST CONCRETE CONE SECTION STEPS ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE GROUT SHELF AND CHANNELS 1 BASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARD PRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT, OR POURED 8" SLAB REINFORCED WITH 6" x 6" 10/10 MESH 16 " O . C . VARIABLE 27" 112" VA R I A B L E 18" MIN. STORM CATCH BASIN W/ SUMP N T S DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB (BOC) TO CENTER OF PIPE: 4' DIA. MH - 9" IN FROM BOC 5' DIA. MH - 3" IN FROM BOC 6' DIA. MH - 3" BEHIND BOC 7' DIA. MH - 9" BEHIND BOC 8' DIA. MH - 15" BEHIND BOC COVER SHALL BE STAMPED "STORM SEWER" METAL SEWER CASTING - REFER TO STRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR TYPE MIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTING RINGS. GROUT BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING, AND ALONG OUTSIDE. PRECAST CONCRETE CONE SECTION STEPS ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE 48 " S U M P CASTING SCHEDULE CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE/RISER GRATE TYPE (NEENAH)REMARKS 1 R-3067 STORM CURB INLET 11 R-1642 STORM MANHOLE NOTE: 1. CASTINGS SHALL BE NEENAH FOUNDRY CASTINGS OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 2. CASTINGS SHALL BE STAMPED WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY NAME ("STORM SEWER", "SANITARY SEWER") CASTING SCHEDULE N T S3 INSTALL HOOD ON OUTLET PIPE 2 Page 183 of 221 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 2025 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 3/11/25 CITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT MANAGER DAVID KNAEBLE CONTACT NUMBER 763-234-7523 DRAWN BY BB REVIEWED BY DK PROJECT NUMBER 25020 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 34 0 5 A N N A P O L I S L A N E N , P L Y M O U T H , M N 5 5 4 4 7 48776 David J. Knaeble LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/11/25 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 OW N E R C5.2 CIVIL DETAILS REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION Page 184 of 221 S89°42'00"W 230.72 S0 0 ° 1 8 ' 0 0 " E 16 4 . 9 8 N 3 6 ° 4 7 ' 3 0 " W 3 2 . 7 2 1 7 2 . 0 2 Δ = 0 ° 2 5 ' 5 1 " R = 2 2 8 7 6 . 3 2 351.96 N89°42'00"E 49 . 9 95.3 65 . 0 80.1 6. 9 3.1 7. 73.1 7. 0 2 Story Brick Sided Building Foundation Area = 6,127 +/- Sq. Ft. Existing Building Existing Building Bituminous Parking Lot Bituminous Parking Lot Bi t u m i n o u s P a r k i n g L o t B i t u m i n o u s P a t h B i t u m i n o u s P a t h ( A P u b l i c R / W ) B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D ( C O U N T Y R O A D N O . 1 5 2 ) 12" P V C 6" PVC 12" PVC 33 " R C P 2 7 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 27" RCP (Per Rec.) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 15" R C P (Per R e c . ) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" W M ( P e r R e c . ) 5 Concrete Steps Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y [A] Concrete Walkway Crosses Property Line A c c e s s Generator Water Service (Per Rec.) Chain Link Fence [B] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line [C] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line Ov e r h a n g Ov e r h a n g Concrete Retaining Wall Edge of Woods Edge of Wo o d s Edge of Woods Edge of Woods Edge of Ice Edge of Ice [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y Eas e m e n t P e r P l a t [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [ 1 0 ] H i g h w a y E a s e m e n t P e r D o c . N o s . 7 2 9 1 1 2 4 & 8 6 6 0 1 2 7 [13] Vehicular Parking Easement Per Doc. No. 5268706 [14] Access Easement Per Doc. No. 11188033 Pond PID: 2711921320004 Address: Unassigned Owner: Brooklyn Ctr Meth Ch PID: 2711921320058 Address: 4513 71st Ave N Owner: Amy Yang PID: 2711921320059 Address: 4507 71st Ave N Owner: Gorpu Daniels/James Gbanjah PID: 2711921320060 Address: 4501 71st Ave N Owner: T Christensen/R Chistensen PID: 2711921320061 Address: 4419 71st Ave N Owner: W R Lindig & K S Lindig PID: 2711921320062 Address: 4413 71st Ave N Owner: James Campbell PID: 2711921330080-2711921330096 Address: Multiple Owner: Multiple PID: 2711921330097 Address: 7100 Brooklyn Blvd PID: 2711921330098 Address: Unassigned Owner: City of Brooklyn Center Found 1/2 Inch Open Iron Pipe Found Nail W/ Flagging Found 1/2 Inch Iron Pipe W/ Illegible Cap Found Rebar [ 9 ] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y E a s e m e n t P e r P l a t Overhang ( P l a t = 3 2 . 7 5 ) (Plat=230.80) ( P l a t = 1 7 1 . 9 7 ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) N36° 2 6 ' 0 4 " W 13.5 6 1 3 2 . 1 3 Δ = 1 ° 0 9 ' 3 8 " R = 6 5 2 3 . 9 4 8" P V C Sanitary Service (Per Rec.) 326.15 28.20 202.52 REF FRZ 24 " 48 " 24 " 36" NO PA R K I N G CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION AT ALL DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS. PLACE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON ALL SLOPES 4:1 OR STEEPER, TYP. (MNDOT CATEGORY 3) INLET PROTECTION AT PROPOSED CATCH BASIN, TYP PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. INSTALL MNDOT CLASS III RIP RAP AROUND LOW POINT COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 2025 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 3/11/25 CITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT MANAGER DAVID KNAEBLE CONTACT NUMBER 763-234-7523 DRAWN BY BB REVIEWED BY DK PROJECT NUMBER 25020 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 34 0 5 A N N A P O L I S L A N E N , P L Y M O U T H , M N 5 5 4 4 7 48776 David J. Knaeble LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/11/25 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 OW N E R SW1.1 SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER EROSION CONTROL NOTES:SWPPP LEGEND: INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DRAINAGE ARROW 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 1137 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. THIS PROJECT IS LESS THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL NOT REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 3. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.3 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. 4. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, MAINTENANCE AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMIT. SWPPP NOTES: ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL1125 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R Page 185 of 221 SW1.3 SWPPP - NARRATIVE OWNER INFORMATIONTRAINING SECTION 21 PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. AREAS AND QUANTITIES: SWPPP CONTACT PERSON CONTRACTOR:SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING: ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY A PERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT. TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPP NOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACT QUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES: THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES. SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER): NA THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHO IMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATED AUGUST 1, 2018 # MNR100001) AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS SWPPP THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOW LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT. THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE 3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS 4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL ADJACENT AND DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS 5. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL 6. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (SECTION 14) 7. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE 8. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL 9. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE 10. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES 11. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES 12. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S 13. INSTALL STREET SECTION 14. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER 15. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS 16. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH 17. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND 18. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.) 19. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. RECORDS RETENTION: THE SWPPP (ORIGINAL OR COPIES) INCLUDING, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS. ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE (3) YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN SECTION 4. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT. 1. THE FINAL SWPPP; 2. ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT; 3.RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE SECTION 11, INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE); 4. ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE; AND 5. ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAINING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OR AS SOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE: 4.1. NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PER SECTION 21 OF THE PERMIT. 4.2. DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING. 4.3. CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING. 5.FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNER IS EXPECTED TO FURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS SWPPP AMENDMENTS (SECTION 6): 1. ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.A OR ITEM 21.2.B OR ANOTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL MUST COMPLETE ALL SWPPP CHANGES. CHANGES INVOLVING THE USE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP MUST INCLUDE A JUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOW THE REPLACEMENT BMP IS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS. 2.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVING A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER. 3.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BY THE SITE OWNER OR OPERATOR, USEPA OR MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE IN ELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER OR THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES (E.G., NUISANCE CONDITIONS AS DEFINED IN MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE OBJECTIVES OF A USEPA APPROVED TMDL. BMP SELECTION AND INSTALLATION (SECTION 7): 1. PERMITTEES MUST SELECT, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN THE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP AND IN THIS PERMIT IN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTIONAL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES. EROSION PREVENTION (SECTION 8): 1. BEFORE WORK BEGINS, PERMITTEES MUST DELINEATE THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED. 2.PERMITTEES MUST MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR DISTURBANCE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT WITH STEEP SLOPES. WHEN STEEP SLOPES MUST BE DISTURBED, PERMITTEES MUST USE TECHNIQUES SUCH AS PHASING AND STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNED FOR STEEP SLOPES (E.G., SLOPE DRAINING AND TERRACING). 3.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, INCLUDING STOCKPILES. STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 14 CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) BUT PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE. 4.FOR PUBLIC WATERS THAT THE MINNESOTA DNR HAS PROMULGATED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURING SPECIFIED FISH SPAWNING TIME FRAMES, PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE WATER'S EDGE, AND THAT DRAIN TO THESE WATERS, WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING THE RESTRICTION PERIOD. 5.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF THE LAST 200 LINEAR FEET OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES OR SWALES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF REMAINING PORTIONS OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. 6. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DURING CONSTRUCTION (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK-DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES, ETC.) DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THESE AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THEIR USE AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM CEASES 7. PERMITTEES MUST NOT USE MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES WITHIN ANY PORTION OF THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE SECTION WITH A CONTINUOUS SLOPE OF GREATER THAN 2 PERCENT. 8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT ALL PIPE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER OR PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. 9. PERMITTEES MUST NOT DISTURB MORE LAND (I.E., PHASING) THAN CAN BE EFFECTIVELY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 11. SEDIMENT CONTROL (SECTION 9): 1. PERMITTEES MUST ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERS OF THE SITE AND DOWNGRADIENT AREAS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO ANY SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN AND MUST KEEP THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES IN PLACE UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER. 2.IF DOWNGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED, BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OR EXCESSIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND AMEND THE SWPPP TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN ITEM 6.3. 3. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK-CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. 4. A FLOATING SILT CURTAIN PLACED IN THE WATER IS NOT A SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP TO SATISFY ITEM 9.2 EXCEPT WHEN WORKING ON A SHORELINE OR BELOW THE WATERLINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT TERM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G., INSTALLATION OF RIP RAP ALONG THE SHORELINE) IN THAT AREA IS COMPLETE, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL AN UPLAND PERIMETER CONTROL PRACTICE IF EXPOSED SOILS STILL DRAIN TO A SURFACE WATER. 5. PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES, IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. 6.PERMITTEES MUST PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS USING APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER ON ALL AREAS WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET. 7. PERMITTEES MAY REMOVE INLET PROTECTION FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (E.G. STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) IS IDENTIFIED BY THE PERMITTEES OR THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G., CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER). PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE NEED FOR REMOVAL IN THE SWPPP. 8. PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF STOCKPILES ON THE DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER. 9. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE STOCKPILES OUTSIDE OF NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. 10. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING BMP TO MINIMIZE THE TRACK OUT OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR ONTO PAVED ROADS WITHIN THE SITE. 11. PERMITTEES MUST USE STREET SWEEPING IF VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO THE STREET. 12. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14. 13. IN ANY AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE FINAL VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION WILL OCCUR, PERMITTEES MUST RESTRICT VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT USE TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. 14. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 15. PERMITTEES MUST DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 16. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR, IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE ON THE SITE, PROVIDE REDUNDANT (DOUBLE) PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTH DISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT LEAST 5 FEET APART UNLESS LIMITED BY LACK OF AVAILABLE SPACE. NATURAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED ADJACENT TO ROAD DITCHES, JUDICIAL DITCHES, COUNTY DITCHES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, AND SEDIMENT BASINS. IF PRESERVING THE BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE REASONS IN THE SWPPP. SHEET PILING IS A REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROL IF INSTALLED IN A MANNER THAT RETAINS ALL STORMWATER. 17. PERMITTEES MUST USE POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER. THE PERMITTEES MUST USE CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO CHEMICAL ADDITION AND MUST DIRECT TREATED STORMWATER TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR FILTRATION OR SETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (SECTION 10): 1. PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MAY DEWATER TO SURFACE WATERS IF THEY VISUALLY CHECK TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND NUISANCE CONDITIONS (SEE MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) WILL NOT RESULT FROM THE DISCHARGE. IF PERMITTEES CANNOT DISCHARGE THE WATER TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING A SURFACE WATER, PERMITTEES MUST TREAT IT WITH APPROPRIATE BMPS SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE SURFACE WATER OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES. 2.IF PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE WATER CONTAINING OIL OR GREASE, THEY MUST USE AN OIL-WATER SEPARATOR OR SUITABLE FILTRATION DEVICE (E.G., CARTRIDGE FILTERS, ABSORBENTS PADS) PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. 3. PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN-DRAINING ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION OR SCOUR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS OR INUNDATION OF WETLANDS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS THAT CAUSES SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND. 4.IF PERMITTEES USE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THEY MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURN THE BACKWASH WATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SECTION 11): 1. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE A TRAINED PERSON, AS IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 21.2.B, WILL INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH IN 24 HOURS. 2.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT BMPS. 3. PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS. PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY UNLESS ANOTHER TIME FRAME IS SPECIFIED IN ITEM 11.5 OR 11.6. PERMITTEES MAY TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME IF FIELD CONDITIONS PREVENT ACCESS TO THE AREA. 4.DURING EACH INSPECTION, PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS BUT NOT CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITION. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. PERMITTEES MUST USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ACCESS. IF PRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF OBTAINING ACCESS. PERMITTEES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLE PERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK IN SURFACE WATERS. 5. PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FOR SEDIMENTATION FROM EROSION OR TRACKED SEDIMENT FROM VEHICLES. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM ALL PAVED SURFACES WITHIN ONE (1) CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY OR, IF APPLICABLE, WITHIN A SHORTER TIME TO AVOID A SAFETY HAZARD TO USERS OF PUBLIC STREETS. 6.PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. 7. PERMITTEES MUST DRAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND REMOVE THE SEDIMENT WHEN THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME. 8. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THAT AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT ON THE SITE (OR AVAILABLE TO THE PROJECT SITE IN THREE (3) CALENDAR DAYS) IS TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.B. 9. PERMITTEES MAY ADJUST THE INSPECTION SCHEDULE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 11.2 AS FOLLOWS: a. INSPECTIONS OF AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH, EVEN IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUES ON OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE; OR b. WHERE SITES HAVE PERMANENT COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING ANYWHERE ON THE SITE, INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH AND, AFTER 12 MONTHS, MAY BE SUSPENDED COMPLETELY UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY RESUMES. THE MPCA MAY REQUIRE INSPECTIONS TO RESUME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT; OR c. WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, INSPECTIONS MAY BE SUSPENDED. INSPECTIONS MUST RESUME WITHIN 24 HOURS OF RUNOFF OCCURRING, OR UPON RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 10. PERMITTEES MUST RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEING CONDUCTED AND THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. THESE RECORDS MUST INCLUDE: a.DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; AND b. NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; AND c. ACCURATE FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE NEEDED; AND d. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES); AND e. DATE OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALL FOR EACH EVENT. PERMITTEES MUST OBTAIN RAINFALL AMOUNTS BY EITHER A PROPERLY MAINTAINED RAIN GAUGE INSTALLED ONSITE, A WEATHER STATION THAT IS WITHIN ONE (1) MILE OF YOUR LOCATION, OR A WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES SITE SPECIFIC RAINFALL DATA FROM RADAR SUMMARIES; AND f. IF PERMITTEES OBSERVE A DISCHARGE DURING THE INSPECTION, THEY MUST RECORD AND SHOULD PHOTOGRAPH AND DESCRIBE THE LOCATION OF THE DISCHARGE (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, SETTLED OR SUSPENDED SOLIDS, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHER OBVIOUS INDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS); AND g. ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION MUST BE DOCUMENTED AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 6 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (SECTION 12): 1. PERMITTEES MUST PLACE BUILDING PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. PERMITTEES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COVER OR PROTECT PRODUCTS WHICH ARE EITHER NOT A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TO STORMWATER OR ARE DESIGNED TO BE EXPOSED TO STORMWATER. 2.PERMITTEES MUST PLACE PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. 3.PERMITTEES MUST STORE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE, (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) IN SEALED CONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7045 INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AS APPLICABLE. 4.PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7035. 5.PERMITTEES MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKED OVER. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7041. 6.PERMITTEES MUST TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED INCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. PERMITTEES MUST REPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. 115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UP MEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE. 7.PERMITTEES MUST LIMIT VEHICLE EXTERIOR WASHING AND EQUIPMENT TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. PERMITTEES MUST CONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND MUST DISPOSE WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY PROPERLY. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS, OR SOLVENTS. 8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS (E.G., CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PERMITTEES MUST PREVENT LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES FROM CONTACTING THE GROUND AND MUST DESIGN THE CONTAINMENT SO IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA RULES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A SIGN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY. PERMIT TERMINATION (SECTION 4 AND SECTION 13): 1. PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ALL TERMINATION CONDITIONS LISTED IN SECTION 13 ARE COMPLETE. 2.PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER SELLING OR OTHERWISE LEGALLY TRANSFERRING THE ENTIRE SITE, INCLUDING PERMIT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ROADS (E.G., STREET SWEEPING) AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINAL CLEAN OUT, OR TRANSFERRING PORTIONS OF A SITE TO ANOTHER PARTY. THE PERMITTEES' COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT TERMINATES AT MIDNIGHT ON THE SUBMISSION DATE OF THE NOT. 3.PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MUST INSTALL PERMANENT COVER OVER ALL AREAS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. VEGETATIVE COVER MUST CONSIST OF A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATION WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATES NO VEGETATION, SUCH AS IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR THE BASE OF A SAND FILTER. 4.PERMITTEES MUST CLEAN THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND MUST ENSURE THE SYSTEM MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 15 THROUGH 19 AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED. 5.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. 6.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. PERMITTEES MAY LEAVE BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON-SITE IN PLACE. 7.FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ONLY, PERMIT COVERAGE TERMINATES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IF THE STRUCTURES ARE FINISHED AND TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL IS COMPLETE, THE RESIDENCE SELLS TO THE HOMEOWNER, AND THE PERMITTEE DISTRIBUTES THE MPCA'S "HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET" TO THE HOMEOWNER. 8.FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (E.G., PIPELINES ACROSS CROPLAND), PERMITTEES MUST RETURN THE DISTURBED LAND TO ITS PRECONSTRUCTION AGRICULTURAL USE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. SEED NOTES: ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS: THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SALVAGE AND PRESERVE EXISTING TOPSOIL NECESSARY FOR FINAL STABILIZATION AND TO ALSO MINIMIZE COMPACTION IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDING THE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET. SEED ·TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111 (OATS COVER CROP) FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEED MIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT A SEEDING RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE. MULCH ·IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE SEED GERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90% COVERAGE (2 TONS PER ACRE OF STRAW MULCH) SLOPES ·3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH ·SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. ·SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS. REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 3405 ANNAPOLIS N, SUITE 100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 HEIDI PROSS 763-383-6216 HPROSS@NHACADEMY.NET PROJECT NARRATIVE: PROJECT IS A REDEVELOPMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING INTO A DAYCARE. SITE, GRADING, UTILITY AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL OCCUR. INFILTRATION NARRATIVE: INFILTRATION IS NOT PROVIDED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT BECAUSE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED. SOIL CONTAMINATION NARRATIVE: SOILS ONSITE HAVE NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED AS CONTAMINATED. SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED): SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT REQUIRED BECAUSE AN NPDES PERMIT IS NOT REQUIRED. PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC: PERMANENT SEED MIX ·FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE PERMANENT SEED MIX. ··AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PER ACRE. ··DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE. ·MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. THIS PROJECT IS LESS THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS NOT REQUIRED AND DOES NOT NEED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 2025 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 3/11/25 CITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT MANAGER DAVID KNAEBLE CONTACT NUMBER 763-234-7523 DRAWN BY BB REVIEWED BY DK PROJECT NUMBER 25020 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 34 0 5 A N N A P O L I S L A N E N , P L Y M O U T H , M N 5 5 4 4 7 48776 David J. Knaeble LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/11/25 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 OW N E R NATIVE BUFFER NARRATIVE: PRESERVING A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER AROUND WATER BODIES IS NOT REQUIRED OF THIS PROJECT BECAUSE WATER BODIES ARE NOT LOCATED ON SITE. DESIGN ENGINEER: DAVID J. KNAEBLE P.E. TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPP TRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA INSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMAN DATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 8/22/2012- 8/23/2012 TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12 DATE OF RECERTIFICATION: 4/22/22 EXPIRATION: 5/31/2025 Page 186 of 221 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c PR O J E C T PRE L I M I N A R Y : NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N 2025 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 3/11/25 CITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT MANAGER DAVID KNAEBLE CONTACT NUMBER 763-234-7523 DRAWN BY BB REVIEWED BY DK PROJECT NUMBER 25020 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D , B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 2 9 NE W H O R I Z O N A C A D E M Y 34 0 5 A N N A P O L I S L A N E N , P L Y M O U T H , M N 5 5 4 4 7 48776 David J. Knaeble LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3/11/25 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 OW N E R SW1.2 SWPPP - DETAILS REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION NOTES: 1. REPLACE INLET GRATE UPON COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF INLET PROTECTION FABRIC. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM THE SURFACE OF THE SYSTEM AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND AT THE COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE DANDY SACK OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT FOR STRUCTURES WITHOUT CURBING.CURB INLET SACK N T S OVERFLOW IS 12 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY EXISTING CURB, PLATE, BOX, AND GRATE DANDY CURB SACK OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT HIGH-FLOW FABRIC 1 FLOW 24 " 24 " 24 " MI N . 6" 6" SEDIMENT FENCE N T S FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE SUPPORT NET AS SPECIFIED. METAL POST AS SPECIFIED. SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4"X4" WIRE HOOKED ONTO PERFORMED CHANNELS ON POSTS AS SPECIFIED. EXISTING GROUND SURFACE METAL POSTS 8'-0" O.C. MAX. CARRY WIRE SUPPORT NET DOWN INTO TRENCH ANCHOR FABRIC WITH SOIL, TAMP BACKFILL FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURE TO WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METAL CLIPS 12" O.C. 2 TYPICAL STAPLE #8 GAUGE WIRE 1 1/2" 10 " NOTE: 1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. EROSION BLANKET N T S PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. 'D' EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SILT TRENCH AND TAMPED. DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES 'C' OVERLAP: BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A' AND 'B'. OVERLAP END OF TOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE 'B' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROM TRENCH 'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4" OR MORE IN DEPTH 'E' OVERFALL 3 PROFILE PLAN TO CONSTRUCTION AREA N T S STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS 24 ' ( M I N ) NOTES: 1. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. 2. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE. 3. REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. 4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 6. CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1-1/2" DIA. CLOSE GRADED, AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118. EX I S T I N G U N D I S T U R B E D R O A D W A Y GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 6" MIN. CRUSHED STONE 75' MINIMUM EXISTING UNDISTURBED ROADWAY TO C O N S T R U C T I O N A R E A 30' FROM EDGE OF ROAD TO FRONT OF SPEED BUMP 35' R . 3 5 ' R . 4" HIGH, 18" WIDE SPEED BUMPFINISHED GRADE 4 Page 187 of 221 TODDLER PLAY YARD PRESCHOOL PLAY YARD BUILDING TRASH BUILDING DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D EX.TREE (TYP.) SEED ALL DISTURBED SOILS IN ADJACENT NATURAL AREA W/ MNDOT 35-241 MESIC PRAIRIE MIXEDGER (TYP.) INFANT PLAY YARD EX. 10" HONEYLOCUST EX. 5" SPRUCE MONUMENT SIGN BIKE RACK GENERATOR DRAINAGE & UTIL. EASEMENT LIGHT POLE (TYP.) FENCE (TYP.) EX. 40" COTTONWOOD RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com PROJECT INFORMATION: CLIENT INFORMATION: 2025 RYLAUR, LLCC Sheet No.: SHEET TITLE:LANDSCAPE PLAN Project Architect: Drawing History/Revisions: Drawing Date: A. PETER HILGER, AIA L1 Carmen Simonet Design LLC 354 Stonebridge Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 695-0273 carmen@simonetdesign.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: CI T Y S U B M I T T A L 03 . 1 1 . 2 0 2 5 SOD KEY NOTES: 1. SEE SHEETS L2-L3 FOR PLANTING DETAILS & LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL SOD, TREES, AND PLANTING BEDS TO BE IRRIGATED. SEED WITH MNDOT 35-241 MESIC PRAIRIE GENERAL LANDSCAPE PLAN1 PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL QTY CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME/COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS OVERSTORY TREES (ALL TREES TO HAVE STRAIGHT TRUNK & SINGLE LEADER) 2 CO CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS 2"BB SEE PLAN FOR SPACING HACKBERRY 2 GT GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS 'HARVE' 2"BB SEE PLAN FOR SPACING NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUST 2 QB QUERCUS BICOLOR 2"BB SEE PLAN FOR SPACING SWAMP WHITE OAK ORNAMENTAL TREES (ALL TREES TO HAVE STRAIGHT TRUNK & SINGLE LEADER) 2 AG AMELANCHIER x GRANDIFLORA 'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE'2"BB SEE PLAN FOR SPACING AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY SHRUBS (24" MIN. SHRUB SIZE AT TIME OF INSTALLATION) 7 AA AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA 'REGENTS' #5 CONT. SPACE 4' O.C. REGENTS SERVICEBERRY 14 AI ARONIA MELANOCARPA 'MORTON' #5 CONT. SPACE 4' O.C. IROQUOIS BEAUTY 18 CS CORNUS SERICEA 'ALLEMAN'S'#5 CONT. SPACE 5' O.C. ALLEMAN'S COMPACT REDTWIG 58 DL DIERVILLA LONICERA #5 CONT. SPACE 3' O.C. DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE 42 SB SPIREA BETULIFOLIA 'TOR'#5 CONT. SPACE 3' O.C. TOR SPIREA PERENNIALS 57 AM ALLIUM 'MILLENIUM'#1 CONT. SPACE 18" 0.C. MILLENIUM 76 CP CAREX PENSYLVANICA #1 CONT. SPACE 18" to 24" O.C. PENNSYLVANIA SEDGE 24 NF NEPETA FAASSENII 'WALKER'S LOW' #1 CONT. SPACE 24" to 30" O.C. WALKER'S LOW CATMINT 5 HS HOSTA SIEBOLDIANA 'ELEGANS'#1 CONT. SPACE 36" O.C. SIEBOLDIANA ELEGANS HOSTA 15 SS SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM #1 CONT. SPACE 24" O.C. LITTLE BLUESTEM 32 SH SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS #3 CONT. SPACE 24" O.C. PRAIRIE DROPSEED LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS DETERMINING NUMBER OF PLANTS DISTRICT: MX-N2 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED-USE TOTAL PROJECT VALUE ESTIMATE: $2,000,000 LANDSCAPE VALUE:REQUIRED ON THIS PLAN $40,000 $54,384 03.11.2025 March 11, 2025 NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 7100 BROOKLYN BLVD. BROOKLYN CENTER NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 3405 ANNAPOLIS LANE N. PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 18CS 5SB 7SS 8SH 4SH 16AM 12SB 24NF 28AM 4AI 2AG 10DL 38CP 1QB 24DL 5HS 8SS 15SB 22CP 24DL 13AM 10SB 20SH 1QB 7AA 2CO 16CP 2GT10AI Page 188 of 221 PLANTING DETAILS PLANTING ON A SLOPE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 5 L2 1 L2 TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 2 L2 EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. WIDTH OF PLANTING HOLE: 18" MIN. LARGER THAN ROOT BALL, ON ALL SIDES. 2. DEPTH OF HOLE: ROOT FLARE TO SIT AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE TOP OF THE FINISHED SOIL ELEVATION. LEAVE SOIL UNDISTURBED BENEATH THE ROOT BALL. 3. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. 4. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. 6. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. 7. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS OR REJECT PLANT. 8. SLIT REMAINING BURLAP AT 6" INTERVALS. 9. PLUMB & BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. THOROUGHLY WATER IN TREE WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANT AND FILL VOIDS. 10.BACKFILL VOIDS AND WATER A SECOND TIME. 11.PLACE DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING. NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT W/ TRUNK OR BRANCHES. 12.TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF STAKING TREES ARE ILLUSTRATED IN DETAIL. 13.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. STAKE TREES IF SITE CONDITIONS, SUCH AS SOIL AND WIND, PREVENT THE TREES FROM STAYING PLUMB. USE 16" X 1.5" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE STRAPS, ATTACH TO POST OR STAKE WITH 10 GAUGE WIRE. REMOVE WITHIN ONE YEAR. 14.REFER TO PLAN AND SPECS. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. NOTES: 1. REMOVE DEAD OR DAMAGED BRANCHES. RETAIN THE NATURAL FORM OF THE TREE. DO NOT CUT THE LEADER. 2. WIDTH OF PLANTING HOLES: 18" MIN. LARGER THAN ROOT BALL, ON ALL SIDES. 3. DEPTH OF HOLE: ROOT FLARE TO SIT AT, OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE TOP OF THE FINISHED SOIL ELEVATION. LEAVE SOIL UNDISTURBED BENEATH THE ROOT BALL. 4. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. 5. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. 6. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. 7. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 8. SLIT REMAINING BURLAP AT 6" INTERVALS. 9. PLUMB & BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL AMENDED WITH COMPOST. THOROUGHLY WATER IN TREE WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 10.BACKFILL VOIDS AND WATER A SECOND TIME. 11.PLACE 4" MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING. NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT W/ TRUNK. 12.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. IF NEEDED, STAKE TREES USING 16" LONG, 1.5" WIDE STRAPS, AND ATTACH TO POST WITH WIRE. INSTALL POST 3' INTO GROUND. REMOVE WITHIN ONE YEAR. 13.WRAP TRUNK IN FALL REMOVE IN SPRING. 14.REFER TO SPECS. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. NOTES: 1. DIG SHRUB HOLE 12" MIN. LARGER THAN CONTAINER SIZE, ALL SIDES. 2. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. 3. REMOVE DEAD OR DAMAGED BRANCHES. RETAIN THE NATURAL FORM OF THE SHRUB. 4. HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL. SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. 5. SET SHRUB ON UNDISTURBED SOIL OR ON THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE TOP OF ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE. 6. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL AMENDED WITH COMPOST. THOROUGHLY WATER IN SHRUB PRIOR TO PLACING MULCH. 7. ALL SHRUB PLANTINGS RECEIVE 4" DEPTH MULCH. 8. REFER TO SPECS. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. NOTES: 1. PLANT INTO PREPARED PLANTING BED. REMOVE WEEDS, LOOSEN COMPACTED SOILS TO A DEPTH OF 6", AND AMEND PLANTING SOIL WITH COMPOST. 2. PLANT AT SAME DEPTH AS IN CONTAINER. 3. PLACE DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OVER PERENNIAL BED. DO NOT PLACE ANY MULCH ON VEGETATION. 4. THOROUGHLY WATER IN PLANTS. 5. REFER TO PLAN AND SPECS. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 2-3" DEPTH MULCH PLANT PER SCHEDULE 6" DEPTH PLANTING SOIL SUBGRADE 3 L2 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 4 L2 PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 4" DEPTH MULCH SHRUB PER SCHEDULE PLANTING SOIL SUBGRADE SLIGHTLY CROWN BOTTOM OF HOLE ROOT BALL PLANTING SOIL SUBGRADE 4" DEPTH MULCHROOT FLARE TREE WRAP TREE PER SCHEDULE GUYING 7'0" STEEL POST ROOT BALL ADJACENT CONDITION VARIES SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN SLIGHTLY CROWN BOTTOM OF HOLE TREE PER SCHEDULE SUBGRADE PLANTING SOIL 2" X 2" X 24" WOOD STAKE SET AT ANGLE STEEL POST GUYING WIRE (TYP)STRAP FLAGGING ONE PER WIRE 4" MULCH SLIGHTLY CROWN BOTTOM OF HOLE ADJACENT CONDITION VARIES SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN ROOT BALL ROOT FLARE CI T Y S U B M I T T A L 03 . 1 1 . 2 0 2 5 RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com PROJECT INFORMATION: CLIENT INFORMATION: 2025 RYLAUR, LLCC Carmen Simonet Design LLC 354 Stonebridge Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 695-0273 carmen@simonetdesign.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 7100 BROOKLYN BLVD. BROOKLYN CENTER NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 3405 ANNAPOLIS LANE N. PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 Sheet No.: SHEET TITLE:LANDSCAPE DETAILS Project Architect: Drawing History/Revisions: Drawing Date: A. PETER HILGER, AIA L2 03.11.2025 March 11, 2025 Page 189 of 221 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS TREES, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS 1. REFERENCES A. MnDOT - Minnesota Department of Transportation, Standard Specifications for Construction, 2020 Edition. B. American Standard for Nursery Stock, ANSI Z60.1-2014. C. ASTM, American Society for Testing and Materials. 2. QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Work shall be performed by a landscape contractor with extensive horticulture knowledge, and a min. of 3 years of experience. B. Handle plants in such a way as to protect from damage either physical or by exposure to sun and wind. Mishandled plants are subject to rejection by Landscape Architect. C. Plants used on this project shall meet the grading standards recommended by the ANSI Z60.1-2014. D. Each tree and shrub shall have a plant tag with botanical and common name attached to it for verification of item.Tag to remain on until acceptance of project. 3. PRODUCTS A. Plants: Provide as specified on Plant Schedule. B. Edging: Colmet steel edging 3/16" x 5" with stakes, black color, or equal. C. Mulch: Double shredded hardwood mulch. D. Water: Contractor to provide. E. Planting Soil: rich friable, loam topsoil, free of debris and seeds, conforming to MnDOT 3877.2, Loam Topsoil Borrow. F. Compost: Conforming to MnDOT 3890.2, Grade 2. G. Tree Wrap: White plastic tree guards or light colored two-ply weather resistant paper product. 4. PLANTING DATES: Spring Planting: Apr. 1 - June 15. These dates may be extended if daytime temps. remain below 80 degrees. Fall: Sept. 30 - Oct. 30th. Daytime temps. need to drop below 80 degrees before planting begins, and may continue until freeze up. Coniferous trees Aug. 15 - Oct. 1st. Plant under favorable weather conditions, do not plant during days of extreme heat. 5. EXECUTION A. Prior to digging, Contractor to have utilities located. B. Contractor to notify Owner and Landscape Architect 3 days in advance of when planting work will occur. C. Plant into prepared planting beds, free of weeds. D. Install trees, shrubs, and perennials per planting details, adjust location if in conflict with utilities. Verify new location with Landscape Architect prior to planting. E. Separate all shrub and perennial beds from sod areas with edger. F. Clean-up entire site following planting operations. 6. ACCEPTANCE OF PLANTING WORK A. Contractor to notify Owner when planting work is complete for review and punch list. B. Contractor to water and maintain the trees, shrubs, and perennials until Owner Acceptance. C. Owner will give Acceptance of Work following satisfactory correction of punch list items. D. Watering and regular landscape maintenance of trees, shrubs, and perennials will be Owners responsibility following acceptance of work. 7. GUARANTEE PERIOD A. Contractor to warranty trees, shrubs and perennials for one year following acceptance of Work by Owner. B. Contractor to maintain the trees in a plumb position throughout the guarantee period. C. Contractor to remove all staking/wiring/ straps and plant tags from trees at the end of the guarantee period. D. Replacements: At the end of the guarantee period, all plants which are unhealthy, dead, not having a normal density, size, shape or color shall be shall be replaced. Replacements shall match caliper and/or height of the other plants at time of replacement. Selection of replacement material and installation practices shall follow the requirements of the Drawings and Specifications. SODDING 1. AREAS TO SOD A. Sod areas as shown on plan 2. REFERENCES A. MnDOT - Minnesota Department of Transportation, Standard Specifications for Construction, 2020 Edition. 3. PRODUCTS A. Sod: Provide drought tolerant, strongly rooted sod, machine cut to pad thickness of 1", excluding top growth and thatch. Sod to be at least 2 years old, free of weeds, disease, or other material which might be detrimental to the development of the sod. Sod to be moist when cut and maintained in moist condition during transportation and storage at the site. Do not use sod that shows signs of visible heating on this project. B. Fertilizer: Slow release 5-10-5 starter fertilizer. C. Water: Contractor to provide. D. Topsoil: provide rich friable, sandy loam, free of debris and seeds, and conforming to MnDOT 3877.2 Common Topsoil Borrow. 4. SOIL PREPARATION A. Verify all sod areas have a minimum of 4" of topsoil. B. Immediately prior to sodding, loosen topsoil to minimum depth of 3". C. On slopes operate cultivating equipment at right angles to the direction of surface drainage. D. Contractor to work all areas to receive sod until the soil is smooth and an even grade is established. Fill all holes, depressions and rivulets to ensure an even grade and that proper elevation is established. Fill material shall be compacted sufficiently to provide uniform density and to resist erosion. Remove all rubble, sticks, branches, stones and other extraneous material over 1/2" in diameter on the surface prior to sodding. E. For all areas to be sodded work in dry, free flowing slow release starter fertilizer into the top 1 inch of soil. 5. EXECUTION A. Install sod during favorable weather, do not sod if ground is frozen or sod is dormant. B. Lay sod with tightly fitting joints, no overlapping joints, and stagger rows to offset joints. Anchor sod on slopes to prevent slippage. C. Thoroughly water sod immediately after installing. Continue watering at frequency necessary to initiate rooting, and until the work is accepted by Owner. D. Clean up and remove all debris resulting from sodding activity and dispose of properly. Restore all areas disturbed by sodding operation to their original condition. 6. ACCEPTANCE OF SOD WORK A. Contractor to notify Owner when sod work is complete for review and punch list. B. Owner to accept work following satisfactory correction of punch list items. C. Contractor will maintain all turf areas in a healthy, growing condition by watering, mowing, and any other maintenance necessary to establish the lawn, for a minimum of 30 days from time of acceptance. D. Any sod that does not show definite growth and establishment during the 30 days from time of acceptance, shall be replaced and established at the proper season by the Contractor at Contractor's expense. IRRIGATION 1. DESCRIPTION A. Work includes: design, furnish, and install complete, fully automatic and programmable underground irrigation system, capable of alternate date watering for all landscape areas. The system shall provide full coverage with uniform levels of total precipitation throughout all irrigated areas. B. The system is to include a master valve and water efficient technologies including: a smart controller with a WaterSense label, a flow meter, soil moisture and/or evapotranspiration (ET) sensors, a rain sensor, and be calibrated to meet all applicable City Codes. C. Dripline to be used in perennial and shrub beds not covered by lawn sprinklers. D. The system is to meet state department of health standards and have a backflow preventer. E. Materials, equipment, and methods of design and installation shall comply with, but not be limited to, the following codes and standards: ·All local and state laws and ordinances, and with all the established codes applicable thereto. ·National Electrical Code. ·American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). ·National Sanitation Foundation (NSF). ·The best management practices developed by the Irrigation Association. F. The designer shall provide balanced pressure and flow and optimum operating efficiency. G. The contractor is responsible for obtaining all permits and licenses required for installation of irrigation system. 2. QUALITY ASSURANCE A. The irrigation system shall be designed and installed by a contractor specializing in irrigation work, and will have a minimum of 5 years of experience designing and installing systems of similar scope and size. B. The contractor shall maintain a skilled foreman on site during the installation of all work and the foreman will have a Minnesota Power Limited Technician License. 3. SUBMITTALS A. Shop Drawings: submit irrigation plan, product schedule, and specifications for review and acceptance. B. Operation and Maintenance Manual: following completion of work, provide the Owner with an operation and maintenance manual of the complete system in a digital pdf file format and one hard copy. C. As-Built Plan: following completion of work, contractor to furnish Owner a scaled as-built irrigation map, with dimensions as needed, on durable paper or laminated to be mounted on wall with the main control panel and a digital file in pdf format. The map shall indicate the zones, location of all controls, piping and depths, heads (including type), drip-lines, valves, connection to water service, and other related components. 4. PRODUCTS A. Select products suitable to the landscape areas. B. All products and materials used in the system shall be new and professional grade. C. Provide sprinkler heads, driplines, electric valves, and automatic controller from one manufacturer: Toro, Rainbird, Hunter Industries, or equal. 5. EXECUTION A. Prior to digging, contractor to have utilities located. B. Water Coverage: Provide uniform water coverage over turf areas and planting beds. C. Turf: Turf areas to be irrigated with spray heads. Locate heads to avoid overspray onto sidewalks, parking areas, signs and buildings. D. Planting Beds: All continuous shrubs, trees, perennial beds to be irrigated with a drip system and spray heads where drip lines are impractical. E. Winterization: System to accommodate winterization by blowing system dry with compressed air. F. Install the irrigation system per contractor's plan and specifications. G. Instructions: Contractor to instruct the Owner in proper operation and maintenance of the system. H. Cleanup: Replace landscaping disturbed by operations. Cleanup all debris and restore site to original condition. 6. REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE A. Contractor to test system to a hydrostatic pressure of not less than 100 psi. Remove and replace any components that do not pass test. B. Contractor to contact Owner and perform operational test after system is fully in place and demonstrate to the Owner that the irrigation system meets coverage requirements and that automatic controls function properly. Any corrective work identified shall be completed within two weeks of receipt ofcomments. C. Owner to accept work following: satisfactory completion of any corrective work, receiving hands-on instructions for operation, and receiving as-built plan and operation and maintenance manual submittals. 7. MAINTENANCE A. Contractor to drain and winterize irrigation system in the fall, following first year of operation, and shall put the system back in service the following spring as part of the work of this contract at no additional cost to the Owner. 8. GUARANTEE A. Warranty irrigation system materials and labor for one year following acceptance of work by Owner. Contractor to promptly furnish and install, at no cost to Owner, any parts that prove defective in material or workmanship. CI T Y S U B M I T T A L 03 . 1 1 . 2 0 2 5 NATIVE SEED ESTABLISHMENT 1. REFERENCES A.MnDOT - Minnesota Department of Transportation, Standard Specifications for Construction, 2020 Edition. B. MnDOT - Minnesota Department of Transportation, Seeding Manual 2023 Edition. 2. QUALITY ASSURANCE A.Qualifications: Contractor to have a minimum of three years of experience in prairie seed establishment. All crews to be under the supervision of a crew leader with min. 3 years of experience with native grass and forb seed establishment, B. Herbicide applicators to be licensed with State of MN Department of Agriculture. C. Native Plant Establishment Requirements, sheet L2, for education and documentation submittals. D.Delivery and Storage of Seed: Contractor shall protect seed from weather or other conditions which would damage or impair the products. 3. PRODUCTS A. Topsoil: Provide friable topsoil, free from weeds, stones, lime, concrete, ashes, slag, or other deleterious matter, conforming to MnDOT 3877.2, A, Common Topsoil Borrow. B. Native Seed Mix: MnDOT 35-241 Mesic Prairie General, conforming to MnDOT 3876.2 requirements. Seed viability to be tested and labeled in accordance with MnDOT 3876.3. C. Mulch: MnDOT 3882.2, Type 3, grain straw, or native grass straw, certified noxious weed free. D.Erosion Control Blanket: MnDOT 3885.2, Cat 20, 2-sided straw. E. Water: Contractor to verify water source and availability prior to construction. If permits or water meters are required the cost shall be borne by the Contractor. Contractor to supply all hoses and appropriate equipment to obtain water. 4. PLANTING BED PREPARATION A. Verify finished grade is complete and ready for seeding work. B. Prior to cultivation, Contractor shall examine site and remove noxious weeds and birdsfoot trefoil. Contractor to remove it, using herbicides appropriate for the types of vegetation to be removed. Apply in proper weather conditions. Reapply if initial application does not take. C. Prepare the soil to minimize soil erosion and to provide a media for plant and root establishment conforming to MnDOT 2574.3, A.3. D. Contractor shall not work soil when moisture content is so great that excessive compaction will occur, nor when it is so dry that dust will form in the air or that clods will not break readily. Apply water, if necessary, to bring soil to an optimum moisture content for tilling. Do not work soil when muddy or frozen. E. Contractor shall use equipment of appropriate size and low ground pressure equipment to achieve a relatively smooth soil surface free of high areas, depressions and tracks, and to minimize soil compaction. 5. SEEDING A. Seed areas as identified on the Drawings. B. Time of Planting: Planting operations are to be conducted under favorable weather conditions. Season of planting can be extended based on current weather patterns. Native grass and forb seeding dates: Spring: April 15 to July 20, Fall: September 20 to October 20. C. Placing native seed mix shall conform to MnDOT 2575.3, A, and B. D.Uniformly sow the seed using a mechanical spreader at the rate specified in the seed mixture. Adjust as needed to achieve the required PLS rate of MnDOT table 3876.2-1, state seed mixes. Do not broadcast seed with wind velocities greater than 15mph. E. Lightly rake and pack the seedbed using a cultipacker or a lawn roller to produce good soil to seed contact. F. Install erosion control blanket over all seeded areas as specified inMnDOT 2575.3, G.1.a 6. CLEAN-UP A. Contractor shall clean up and remove deleterious materials and debris from the entire work area prior to final completion. B. ACCEPTANCE OF NATIVE SEED ESTABLISHMENT Contractor to notify Owner when native seeding work is complete and the following performance standard is met. Native vegetation cover: No less than 70% absolute cover Non-native vegetation: No more than 15% absolute cover Bare ground:No more than 15% absolute cover 7. 3- YEAR MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT A.Maintenance agreement for native planting areas shall last 3 years from acceptance of seeding date. B. Contractor to provide 3 site visits per year to mow/weed whip, spot treat invasive species, and hand weed. Reseed bare areas that are 9 square feet or larger. Remove and reseed solid patches of non-native vegetation. Site visits to be timed to mow before weeds go to seed. Mow height to be just above the new native seedlings, rake off cuttings if weeds have already flowered. C. Following each site visit submit a monitoring report to the Owner with the date of site visit, an assessment of the vegetation cover, and activities performed. RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com PROJECT INFORMATION: CLIENT INFORMATION: 2025 RYLAUR, LLCC Carmen Simonet Design LLC 354 Stonebridge Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 695-0273 carmen@simonetdesign.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 7100 BROOKLYN BLVD. BROOKLYN CENTER NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 3405 ANNAPOLIS LANE N. PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 Sheet No.: SHEET TITLE:LANDSCAPE NOTES Project Architect: Drawing History/Revisions: Drawing Date: A. PETER HILGER, AIA L3 03.11.2025 March 11, 2025 Page 190 of 221 S89°42'00"W 230.72 S0 0 ° 1 8 ' 0 0 " E 16 4 . 9 8 N 3 6 ° 4 7 ' 3 0 " W 3 2 . 7 2 1 7 2 . 0 2 Δ = 0 ° 2 5 ' 5 1 " R = 2 2 8 7 6 . 3 2 351.96 N89°42'00"E 49 . 9 95.3 65 . 0 80.1 6. 9 3.1 7.7 3. 1 7. 0 2 Story Brick Sided Building Foundation Area = 6,127 +/- Sq. Ft. Existing Building Existing Building Bituminous Parking Lot Bituminous Parking Lot Bituminous Parking Lot Bi t u m i n o u s P a r k i n g L o t B i t u m i n o u s P a t h B i t u m i n o u s P a t h ( A P u b l i c R / W ) B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D ( C O U N T Y R O A D N O . 1 5 2 ) 12" P V C 6" PVC 12" PVC 33 " R C P 2 7 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 27" RCP (Per Rec.) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 15" R C P (Per R e c . ) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" W M ( P e r R e c . ) 11 1 5 5 8 10 19 7 2 5 M o n u m e n t S i g n Concrete Steps Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y [A] Concrete Walkway Crosses Property Line A c c e s s Generator Water Service (Per Rec.) Concrete Chain Link Fence [B] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line [C] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line Trash Enclosure Landscaping Rock C o l u m n O v e r h a n g Ov e r h a n g Ov e r h a n g Concrete Retaining Wall Edge of Woods Edge of Wo o d s Edge of Woods Edge of Woods Edge of Ice Edge of Ice [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y Eas e m e n t P e r P l a t [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [ 1 0 ] H i g h w a y E a s e m e n t P e r D o c . N o s . 7 2 9 1 1 2 4 & 8 6 6 0 1 2 7 [13] Vehicular Parking Easement Per Doc. No. 5268706 [14] Access Easement Per Doc. No. 11188033 Pond PID: 2711921320004 Address: Unassigned Owner: Brooklyn Ctr Meth Ch PID: 2711921320058 Address: 4513 71st Ave N Owner: Amy Yang PID: 2711921320059 Address: 4507 71st Ave N Owner: Gorpu Daniels/James Gbanjah PID: 2711921320060 Address: 4501 71st Ave N Owner: T Christensen/R Chistensen PID: 2711921320061 Address: 4419 71st Ave N Owner: W R Lindig & K S Lindig PID: 2711921320062 Address: 4413 71st Ave N Owner: James Campbell PID: 2711921330080-2711921330096 Address: Multiple Owner: Multiple PID: 2711921330097 Address: 7100 Brooklyn Blvd PID: 2711921330098 Address: Unassigned Owner: City of Brooklyn Center Found 1/2 Inch Open Iron Pipe Found Nail W/ Flagging Found 1/2 Inch Iron Pipe W/ Illegible Cap Found Rebar [ 9 ] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y E a s e m e n t P e r P l a t Overhang ( P l a t = 3 2 . 7 5 ) (Plat=230.80) ( P l a t = 1 7 1 . 9 7 ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) N36° 2 6 ' 0 4 " W 13.5 6 1 3 2 . 1 3 Δ = 1 ° 0 9 ' 3 8 " R = 6 5 2 3 . 9 4 N 3 7 ° 3 5 ' 4 2 " W 6 0 . 4 8 8" P V C Sanitary Service (Per Rec.) 326.1525.81 28.20 202.52 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 1, Block 1, 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition, as platted and recorded. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property GENERAL SURVEY NOTES 1. Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (1986 Adjustment). 2. Elevations are based on the NGVD 29 Datum. Site Benchmark is the top nut of the fire hydrant located on the northeasterly side of Brooklyn Boulevard, approximately 27 feet northeast from the northwest corner of the subject property, as shown hereon. Elevation = 869.78. 3. We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from the following sources: plans obtained from utility companies, plans provided by client, markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources. We have used this information to develop a view of the underground utilities for this site. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY NOTES (numbered per Table A) 1. Monuments placed and/or found at all major corners of the boundary of the surveyed property as shown hereon. 2. Site Address: 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55429. 3. This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0204F, effective date of November 4, 2016. 4. The gross land area is 48,095 +/- square feet or 1.104 +/- acres. Right of Way Easement Area= 4,397 +/- square feet or 0.101 +/- acres. Total Area Minus Right of Way= 43,698 +/- square feet or 1.003 +/- acres. 7. (a) Exterior dimensions of buildings at ground level as shown hereon. (b)(1) Square footage of exterior footprint of buildings at ground level as shown hereon. 8. Substantial features observed in the process of conducting the fieldwork as shown hereon. Please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observed all site features located on the subject property. 9. The number of striped parking stalls on this site are as follows: 61 Regular + 3 Handicap = 64 Total Parking Stalls. 13. The names of the adjoining owners of the platted lands, as shown hereon, are based on information obtained from the Hennepin County Interactive Property Map. SURVEY REPORT 1. This map and report was prepared with the benefit of a Loan Policy of Title Insurance Proforma issued by Commercial Partners Title, a division of Chicago Title Insurance company as agent for Chicago Title Insurance Company, File No. CP71429, Date of Policy: Date and Time of Recording. We note the following with regards to Schedule B II Exceptions of the herein referenced Proforma: a. Item no.'s 1-8 and 11-12 are not survey related. b. The following are numbered per the referenced Proforma: [9]. Drainage and utility easements as shown on the recorded plat of 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition. Easements are located around the perimeter and the middle portion of the subject property, as shown hereon. [10]. Easement for highway purposes in favor of the County of Hennepin described as Parcel 29 contained in Notice of Lis Pendens filed April 26, 2000, as Document No. 7291124, and in Final Certificate dated September 22, 2005, filed September 23, 2005, as Document No. 8660127. Document creates a highway easement located over the southwesterly portion of the subject property, a shown hereon. [13]. Terms and conditions of and easements contained in Declaration dated March 18, 1987, filed May 15, 1987, as Document No. 5268706. Document creates an easement for vehicular parking and for constructing, repairing, and maintaining an asphalt parking surface with the benefit to Lot 1 Block 1, 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition. Easement is located over the Easterly 3 feet of Lot 2 Block 1, 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition, as shown hereon. [14]. Terms and conditions of Access Easement and Utility Facilities Agreement dated __________________, recorded _______________, as Document No. ___________________. Please note it appears said access easement has been recorded per Document No. 11188033, dated 3-16-2023, provided to us by the client. Access easement benefiting Lot 2, Block 1, 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition, is located through the middle portion of the subject property, as shown hereon. 2. Conflicts such as (but not limited to): encroachments, protrusions, access, occupation, and easements and/or servitudes: [A]. Concrete walkway crosses the north line of the subject property, as shown hereon. [B]. Chain link fence crosses the north line of the subject property, as shown hereon. [C]. Chain link fence crosses the east line of the subject property, as shown hereon. ALTA CERTIFICATION To: 7100 Brooklyn Blvd LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company; Associated Bank, its successors and/or assigns as their respective interests may appear; Commercial Partners Title, a division of Chicago Title Insurance; and Chicago Title Insurance Company: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2021 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 7(a), 7(b)(1), 8, 9, and 13 of Table A thereof. The fieldwork was completed on 1-31-2025. Dated this 5th day of February, 2025. ________________________________________________________ Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565 rory@civilsitegroup.com VICINITY MAP 71 0 0 B r o o k l y n B o u l e v a r d Br o o k l y n C e n t e r , H e n n e p i n C o u n t y , M i n n e s o t a 5 5 4 2 9 14 P h e a s a n t L a n e , N o r t h O a k s , M i n n e s o t a 5 5 1 2 7 Ry l a u r , L L C PR O J E C T PROJECT NO.: 25020.00 COPYRIGHT 2025 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION V1.0 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY . . . . . . . . . . . . N 44565 RORY L. SYNSTELIEN LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 2-5-2025 N CL I E N T Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 QA/QC FIELD CREW DRAWN BY REVIEWED BY UPDATED BY DP/MG DS CJ . OVERHEAD UTILITIES GASMAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER FIBER/COMM. LINE ELECTRIC LINE (RECORD) WATERMAIN ELECTRIC LINE GASMAIN (RECORD) CHAINLINK FENCE LINE Linetype & Symbol Legend CONCRETE SURFACE PAVER SURFACE BITUMINOUS SURFACE GRAVEL/LANDSCAPE SURFACE IRON FENCE LINE GUARDRAIL WATERMAIN (RECORD) SANITARY SEWER (RECORD) STORM SEWER (RECORD) FIBER/COMM. LINE (RECORD) TELEPHONE LINE (RECORD) TELEPHONE LINE SIGNSANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE CABLE TV BOX TELEPHONE MANHOLE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE BOX TRAFFIC SIGNAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER WATER MANHOLE WATER VALVE AIR CONDITIONER BOLLARD CATCH BASIN ELECTRIC MANHOLE GAS VALVE FLAG POLE HANDICAP SYMBOL FOUND IRON MONUMENT HYDRANT CAST IRON MONUMENT SET OR TO BE SET IRON MONUMENT FLARED END SECTION POWER POLE UTILITY MANHOLE GUY WIRE CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE ROOF DRAIN SEWER CLEAN OUT FIRE CONNECTION WELL UTILITY VAULT POST INDICATOR VALVE GAS MANHOLE HAND HOLE FIBER/COMM. MANHOLE MAIL BOX FUEL TANK ELECTRICAL OUTLET SB SOIL BORING LIGHT POLE ACCESS RESTRICTION WOODEN FENCE LINE SATELLITE DISH BUSH/SHRUB 40102001020 SCALE IN FEET VA C A T E ADDEXISTING Page 191 of 221 S89°42'00"W 230.72 S0 0 ° 1 8 ' 0 0 " E 16 4 . 9 8 N 3 6 ° 4 7 ' 3 0 " W 3 2 . 7 2 1 7 2 . 0 2 Δ = 0 ° 2 5 ' 5 1 " R = 2 2 8 7 6 . 3 2 351.96 N89°42'00"E 49 . 9 95.3 65 . 0 80.1 6. 9 3.1 7.7 3. 1 7. 0 2 Story Brick Sided Building Foundation Area = 6,127 +/- Sq. Ft. Existing Building Existing Building Bituminous Parking Lot Bituminous Parking Lot Bituminous Parking Lot Bi t u m i n o u s P a r k i n g L o t B i t u m i n o u s P a t h B i t u m i n o u s P a t h ( A P u b l i c R / W ) B R O O K L Y N B O U L E V A R D ( C O U N T Y R O A D N O . 1 5 2 ) 12" P V C 6" PVC 12" PVC 33 " R C P 2 7 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 27" RCP (Per Rec.) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 8 " W M ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 15" R C P (Per R e c . ) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" WM (Per Rec.) 6" W M ( P e r R e c . ) 11 1 5 5 8 10 19 7 2 5 M o n u m e n t S i g n Concrete Steps Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y Co n c r e t e W a l k w a y [A] Concrete Walkway Crosses Property Line A c c e s s Generator Water Service (Per Rec.) Concrete Chain Link Fence [B] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line [C] Chain Link Fence Crosses Property Line Trash Enclosure Landscaping Rock C o l u m n O v e r h a n g Ov e r h a n g Ov e r h a n g Concrete Retaining Wall Edge of Woods Edge of Wo o d s Edge of Woods Edge of Woods Edge of Ice Edge of Ice [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y Eas e m e n t P e r P l a t [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [9] Drainage and Utility Easement Per Plat [ 1 0 ] H i g h w a y E a s e m e n t P e r D o c . N o s . 7 2 9 1 1 2 4 & 8 6 6 0 1 2 7 [13] Vehicular Parking Easement Per Doc. No. 5268706 [14] Access Easement Per Doc. No. 11188033 Pond PID: 2711921320004 Address: Unassigned Owner: Brooklyn Ctr Meth Ch PID: 2711921320058 Address: 4513 71st Ave N Owner: Amy Yang PID: 2711921320059 Address: 4507 71st Ave N Owner: Gorpu Daniels/James Gbanjah PID: 2711921320060 Address: 4501 71st Ave N Owner: T Christensen/R Chistensen PID: 2711921320061 Address: 4419 71st Ave N Owner: W R Lindig & K S Lindig PID: 2711921320062 Address: 4413 71st Ave N Owner: James Campbell PID: 2711921330080-2711921330096 Address: Multiple Owner: Multiple PID: 2711921330097 Address: 7100 Brooklyn Blvd PID: 2711921330098 Address: Unassigned Owner: City of Brooklyn Center Found 1/2 Inch Open Iron Pipe Found Nail W/ Flagging Found 1/2 Inch Iron Pipe W/ Illegible Cap Found Rebar [ 9 ] D r a i n a g e a n d U t i l i t y E a s e m e n t P e r P l a t Overhang ( P l a t = 3 2 . 7 5 ) (Plat=230.80) ( P l a t = 1 7 1 . 9 7 ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) 1 2 " R C P ( P e r R e c . ) N36° 2 6 ' 0 4 " W 13.5 6 1 3 2 . 1 3 Δ = 1 ° 0 9 ' 3 8 " R = 6 5 2 3 . 9 4 N 3 7 ° 3 5 ' 4 2 " W 6 0 . 4 8 8" P V C Sanitary Service (Per Rec.) 326.1525.81 28.20 202.52 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 1, Block 1, 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition, as platted and recorded. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property GENERAL SURVEY NOTES 1. Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (1986 Adjustment). 2. Elevations are based on the NGVD 29 Datum. Site Benchmark is the top nut of the fire hydrant located on the northeasterly side of Brooklyn Boulevard, approximately 27 feet northeast from the northwest corner of the subject property, as shown hereon. Elevation = 869.78. 3. We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from the following sources: plans obtained from utility companies, plans provided by client, markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources. We have used this information to develop a view of the underground utilities for this site. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY NOTES (numbered per Table A) 1. Monuments placed and/or found at all major corners of the boundary of the surveyed property as shown hereon. 2. Site Address: 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55429. 3. This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0204F, effective date of November 4, 2016. 4. The gross land area is 48,095 +/- square feet or 1.104 +/- acres. Right of Way Easement Area= 4,397 +/- square feet or 0.101 +/- acres. Total Area Minus Right of Way= 43,698 +/- square feet or 1.003 +/- acres. 7. (a) Exterior dimensions of buildings at ground level as shown hereon. (b)(1) Square footage of exterior footprint of buildings at ground level as shown hereon. 8. Substantial features observed in the process of conducting the fieldwork as shown hereon. Please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observed all site features located on the subject property. 9. The number of striped parking stalls on this site are as follows: 61 Regular + 3 Handicap = 64 Total Parking Stalls. 13. The names of the adjoining owners of the platted lands, as shown hereon, are based on information obtained from the Hennepin County Interactive Property Map. SURVEY REPORT 1. This map and report was prepared with the benefit of a Loan Policy of Title Insurance Proforma issued by Commercial Partners Title, a division of Chicago Title Insurance company as agent for Chicago Title Insurance Company, File No. CP71429, Date of Policy: Date and Time of Recording. We note the following with regards to Schedule B II Exceptions of the herein referenced Proforma: a. Item no.'s 1-8 and 11-12 are not survey related. b. The following are numbered per the referenced Proforma: [9]. Drainage and utility easements as shown on the recorded plat of 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition. Easements are located around the perimeter and the middle portion of the subject property, as shown hereon. [10]. Easement for highway purposes in favor of the County of Hennepin described as Parcel 29 contained in Notice of Lis Pendens filed April 26, 2000, as Document No. 7291124, and in Final Certificate dated September 22, 2005, filed September 23, 2005, as Document No. 8660127. Document creates a highway easement located over the southwesterly portion of the subject property, a shown hereon. [13]. Terms and conditions of and easements contained in Declaration dated March 18, 1987, filed May 15, 1987, as Document No. 5268706. Document creates an easement for vehicular parking and for constructing, repairing, and maintaining an asphalt parking surface with the benefit to Lot 1 Block 1, 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition. Easement is located over the Easterly 3 feet of Lot 2 Block 1, 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition, as shown hereon. [14]. Terms and conditions of Access Easement and Utility Facilities Agreement dated __________________, recorded _______________, as Document No. ___________________. Please note it appears said access easement has been recorded per Document No. 11188033, dated 3-16-2023, provided to us by the client. Access easement benefiting Lot 2, Block 1, 7100 Corporate Plaza 2nd Addition, is located through the middle portion of the subject property, as shown hereon. 2. Conflicts such as (but not limited to): encroachments, protrusions, access, occupation, and easements and/or servitudes: [A]. Concrete walkway crosses the north line of the subject property, as shown hereon. [B]. Chain link fence crosses the north line of the subject property, as shown hereon. [C]. Chain link fence crosses the east line of the subject property, as shown hereon. ALTA CERTIFICATION To: 7100 Brooklyn Blvd LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company; Associated Bank, its successors and/or assigns as their respective interests may appear; Commercial Partners Title, a division of Chicago Title Insurance; and Chicago Title Insurance Company: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2021 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 7(a), 7(b)(1), 8, 9, and 13 of Table A thereof. The fieldwork was completed on 1-31-2025. Dated this 5th day of February, 2025. ________________________________________________________ Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565 rory@civilsitegroup.com VICINITY MAP 71 0 0 B r o o k l y n B o u l e v a r d Br o o k l y n C e n t e r , H e n n e p i n C o u n t y , M i n n e s o t a 5 5 4 2 9 14 P h e a s a n t L a n e , N o r t h O a k s , M i n n e s o t a 5 5 1 2 7 Ry l a u r , L L C PR O J E C T PROJECT NO.: 25020.00 COPYRIGHT 2025 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION V1.0 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY . . . . . . . . . . . . N 44565 RORY L. SYNSTELIEN LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 2-5-2025 N CL I E N T Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 QA/QC FIELD CREW DRAWN BY REVIEWED BY UPDATED BY DP/MG DS CJ . OVERHEAD UTILITIES GASMAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER FIBER/COMM. LINE ELECTRIC LINE (RECORD) WATERMAIN ELECTRIC LINE GASMAIN (RECORD) CHAINLINK FENCE LINE Linetype & Symbol Legend CONCRETE SURFACE PAVER SURFACE BITUMINOUS SURFACE GRAVEL/LANDSCAPE SURFACE IRON FENCE LINE GUARDRAIL WATERMAIN (RECORD) SANITARY SEWER (RECORD) STORM SEWER (RECORD) FIBER/COMM. LINE (RECORD) TELEPHONE LINE (RECORD) TELEPHONE LINE SIGNSANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE CABLE TV BOX TELEPHONE MANHOLE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE BOX TRAFFIC SIGNAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER WATER MANHOLE WATER VALVE AIR CONDITIONER BOLLARD CATCH BASIN ELECTRIC MANHOLE GAS VALVE FLAG POLE HANDICAP SYMBOL FOUND IRON MONUMENT HYDRANT CAST IRON MONUMENT SET OR TO BE SET IRON MONUMENT FLARED END SECTION POWER POLE UTILITY MANHOLE GUY WIRE CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE ROOF DRAIN SEWER CLEAN OUT FIRE CONNECTION WELL UTILITY VAULT POST INDICATOR VALVE GAS MANHOLE HAND HOLE FIBER/COMM. MANHOLE MAIL BOX FUEL TANK ELECTRICAL OUTLET SB SOIL BORING LIGHT POLE ACCESS RESTRICTION WOODEN FENCE LINE SATELLITE DISH BUSH/SHRUB 40102001020 SCALE IN FEET VACATE ADD E X I S T I N G 7'-6" 7'-6" 7'-6" 7'-6" SEWER LINE OUT OF EASEMENT Page 192 of 221 STAIR C RM 144 85 sf ELEVATOR STAIR A TLT RM #05 49 sf UNISEX Storage RM #02 57 sf HALL RM #01 51 sf CLST RM #07 41 sf LARGE MOTOR RM RM #09 1014 SF MECH RM RM #03 225 SF UTILITY RM RM #04 41 SF 28 CHILDREN OverflowCar Seat RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com PROJECT INFORMATION: CLIENT INFORMATION: Sheet No NEW HORIZON ACADEMY ANAPOLIS AVE PLYMOUTH, MN SHEET TITLE: Drawn By: VJH Project Architect: Drawing History/Revisions: Drawing Date: Checked By: APH 03.11.2025 A. PETER HILGER, AIA 2025 RYLAUR, LLCC A100 PRELIMINARY LOWER LEVEL BASEMENT PLAN 1 LOWER LEVEL BASEMENT PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Project Architect: C NEW PERIMETER HVAC SOFFIT INSTALL NEW FOOTING FOR NEW PILLARS Page 193 of 221 CAR SEATS REF FRZ 24 " 48 " STAIR B / EXIT RM 116 167 sf HC TLT RM 124 54 sf HC TLT RM 105 58 sf UNISEX HALL A RM 110 258 sf HALL B RM 106 84 sf ELEVATOR STAIR A RM 101 103 sf VESTIBULE 100 44 sf INFANT A RM #111 510 sf @ 1:4 12 Kids / 3 Staff CRIB A RM #112 12 Cribs 195 sf CRIB B RM #115 12 Cribs 186 sf INFANT B RM #114 490 sf @ 1:4 12 Kids / 3 Staff LOBBY RM #103 460 sf OFFICE RM #104 155 sf @ 1:150 1 Staff TODDLER 2 RM #117 504 sf @ 1:7 14 Kids / 2 Staff TODDLER 1 RM #120 505 sf @ 1:7 14 Kids / 2 Staff INFANT TRANSITION RM #122 507 sf @ 1:7 14 Kids / 2 Staff KITCHEN RM #107 308 sf @ 1:200 1 Staff 2 4 " 36 " CONF RM RM #108 207 gsf171 net sf/15 = 11 occ COT RM 123 16 sf LANDING RM 109 37 sf COT RM 121 16 sf COT RM 118 16 sf TLT RM 119 82 sf MOTHER RM #102 54 sf LAUNDRY RM 113 59 sf JOINT Si g n I n C o u n t e r RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com PROJECT INFORMATION: CLIENT INFORMATION: Sheet No NEW HORIZON ACADEMY ANAPOLIS AVE PLYMOUTH, MN SHEET TITLE: Drawn By: VJH Project Architect: Drawing History/Revisions: Drawing Date: Checked By: APH 03.11.2025 A. PETER HILGER, AIA 2025 RYLAUR, LLCC A101 PRELIMINARY MAIN GRADE LEVEL PLAN 1 MAIN GRADE LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Project Architect: C NEW DOWNSPOUT TO TIE INTO STORM DRAIN NEW DOWNSPOUT TO TIE INTO STORM DRAIN NEW PILLARS SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NEW CANOPY w/BUILT-IN GUTTER SYSTEM 10'-4 " 8'- 0 " Page 194 of 221 COT RM 212 16 sf COT RM 208 16 sf TLT RM 206 31 sf HC TLT RM 205 51 sf TLT RM 210 34 sf HC TLT RM 209 45 sf NewChase STAIR B ELEVATOR Open to Below TLT RM 214 34 sf HC TLT RM 213 45 sf TLT RM 218 48 sf HC TLT RM 219 43 sf COT RM 204 22 sf HC TLT RM 202 50 sf INISEX COT RM 216 16 sf STAFF RM RM #105 154 SF & MECH RM RM #220 262 gsf PRESCHOOL RM #207 738 sf @ 1:10 21 Kids / 3 Staff PRESCHOOL RM #211 741 sf @ 1:10 21 Kids / 3 Staff PRESCHOOL RM #215 746 sf @ 1:10 21 Kids / 3 Staff PRESCHOOL RM #203 739 sf @ 1:10 21 Kids / 3 Staff HALLWAY RM #201 648 sf REF NewChase STORAGE RM 212 16 sf STORAGE NewChase SENSORY RM RM #105 204 SF 200 net sf +/- Existing Ventilation Ductwork RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com PROJECT INFORMATION: CLIENT INFORMATION: Sheet No NEW HORIZON ACADEMY ANAPOLIS AVE PLYMOUTH, MN SHEET TITLE: Drawn By: VJH Project Architect: Drawing History/Revisions: Drawing Date: Checked By: APH 03.11.2025 A. PETER HILGER, AIA 2025 RYLAUR, LLCC A102 PRELIMINARY UPPER LEVEL PLAN 1 UPPER LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Project Architect: C Page 195 of 221 RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com PROJECT INFORMATION: CLIENT INFORMATION: Sheet No NEW HORIZON ACADEMY ANAPOLIS AVE PLYMOUTH, MN SHEET TITLE: Drawn By: VJH Project Architect: Drawing History/Revisions: Drawing Date: Checked By: APH 03.11.2025 A. PETER HILGER, AIA 2025 RYLAUR, LLCC A200 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1 FRONT FACADE SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Project Architect: C EXTERIOR DEMO KEYNOTES REMOVE EXISTING STOREFRONT WINDOW & CUT DOWN WALL BELOW SILL DOWN TO FLOOR FOR NEW EXTERIOR DOOR & SIDELIGHT INSTALLATION REMOVE EXISTING OUTDOOR STAIRWELL GUARDRAILING - DEMO SHOWN DASHED BLUE, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING CANOPY & REPLACE w/NEW CANOPY STRUCTURE AT FRONT WALL REMOVE EXISTING NIGHT DEPOSIT DROP BOXES EXTERIOR KEYNOTES INSTALL NEW ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DOOR & SIDELIGHT - MATCH EXISTING STOREFRONT INSTALL NEW BLACK METAL PICKET FENCE ALONG EXIST OUTDOOR STAIRWELL & AT TOP LANDING AREA w/ EMERGENCY EGRESS GATE. REPLACE STAIRWELL HANDRAILS AS/IF NEEDED INFILL WALL w/SALVAGED BRICK WHERE NIGHT DEPOSIT DROP BOXES HAVE BEEN REMOVED # 1 2 3 4 5 # A B C D E A 1 3 C REMOVE EXISTING SIGN BOX & RESTORE ORIGINAL ROOF PROFILE & MATERIALS NEW ILLUMINATED "NEW HORIZON ACADEMY" WALL SIGN AT FRONT BLDG ENTRANCE = 67 sf max. Approx. 19'-4" x 3'-6" INSTALL NEW CANOPY STRUCTURE AT FRONT BLDG ENTRANCE w/BUILT-IN GUTTER SYSTEM 4 D E EXISTING FRONT ENTRY SIDE PHOTODEXISTING FRONT ENTRY PHOTO F EXISTING FRONT ENTRY SIDE PHOTO A REMOVE EXIST FIRE HYDRANT PHOTO B REMOVE EXIST TRASH ENCLOSURE 4 D 4 D 3 C C EXISTING BLDG PHOTO FROM BROOKLYN BLVD 4 D 2 B REMOVE EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN - SEE 2/A002 FOR NEW MONUMNET SIGN DETAILS - SEE A001 FOR LOCATIONF FEXISTING LIGHT POLE WHERE INDICATED ON SITE PLAN TO BE RELOCATED - SEE A001 FOR LOCATIONG REMOVE EXISTING FLAG POLEH REMOVE EXISTING ATM ISLAND IN ITS ENTIRETYI G H I DEMOLISH EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE SEE A001 FOR LOCATION OF NEW TRASH BUILDING REFERENCE 4/A002 FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION DETAILS J J ABANDON EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT - SEE CIVIL PLANSK F 4 CUT DOWN BRICK WALL BELOW SILL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF NEW EXIT DOOR - SALVAGE BRICK & REFERENCE KEYNOTE #5 FOR RE-PURPOSE LOCATION L L REMOVE EXISTING ROOF "DIAMOND" & RESTORE TO ORIGINAL ROOF PROFILE & MATERIALSM RESTORE ROOF FACADE TO ORIGINAL PROFILE w/MATERIALS TO MATCH EXISTING6 6 M 6 M 6 M 6 M L Angled View NEW CANOPY ROOFING TO MATCH EXISTING METAL ROOF7 7 8 WOOD GRAIN NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT HORIZONTAL SIDING8 CANOPY PILLAR PAINTED NEW HORIZON BLUE9 BRICK PILLAR BASE BRICK TO MATCH EXISTING AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE10 9 10 Page 196 of 221 Upper Level 2 11'-7 1/2" Grade Level 1 0'-0" Roof Joist 22'-6" T/Parapet 26'-2" Upper Level 2 11'-7 1/2" Grade Level 1 0'-0" Roof Joist 22'-6" T/Parapet 26'-2" RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com PROJECT INFORMATION: CLIENT INFORMATION: Sheet No NEW HORIZON ACADEMY ANAPOLIS AVE PLYMOUTH, MN SHEET TITLE: Drawn By: VJH Project Architect: Drawing History/Revisions: Drawing Date: Checked By: APH 03.11.2025 A. PETER HILGER, AIA 2025 RYLAUR, LLCC A201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Project Architect: C 1 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A 1 A 1 2 B 3 C 4 D L L 9 10 8 7 6 M 6 M Page 197 of 221 Upper Level 2 11'-7 1/2" Grade Level 1 0'-0" Roof Joist 22'-6" T/Parapet 26'-2" Upper Level 2 11'-7 1/2" Grade Level 1 0'-0" Roof Joist 22'-6" T/Parapet 26'-2" RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com PROJECT INFORMATION: CLIENT INFORMATION: Sheet No NEW HORIZON ACADEMY ANAPOLIS AVE PLYMOUTH, MN SHEET TITLE: Drawn By: VJH Project Architect: Drawing History/Revisions: Drawing Date: Checked By: APH 03.11.2025 A. PETER HILGER, AIA 2025 RYLAUR, LLCC A202 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Project Architect: C 1 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A 1 A 1 A 1 2 B 2 B 3 C 4 D 5 E L L L +/ - 3 ' - 6 " +/- 19'-4" 4 9 10 8 7 6 M Page 198 of 221 Upper Level 2 11'-7 1/2" Grade Level 1 0'-0" Roof Joist 22'-6" T/Parapet 26'-2" Upper Level 2 11'-7 1/2" Grade Level 1 0'-0" Roof Joist 22'-6" T/Parapet 26'-2" 18d Beam .75" metal deck 1' - 8 " .75" subfloor 1' - 1 0 " 18d Beam 1.5" metal deck 1' - 8 " .75" subfloor 1' - 1 0 " MECHANICAL ROOM 20d Barjoist22d Barjoist 20d Barjoist22d Barjoist Upper Level 2 11'-7 1/2" Grade Level 1 0'-0" Roof Joist 22'-6" T/Parapet 26'-2" Upper Level 2 11'-7 1/2" Grade Level 1 0'-0" Roof Joist 22'-6" T/Parapet 26'-2" WOMENSJANITOR WOMENSMENSJAN LARGE MOTOR ROOM 24d Beam 21d Beam 18d Beam .75" metal deck.75" subfloor 22d Barjoist RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com PROJECT INFORMATION: CLIENT INFORMATION: Sheet No NEW HORIZON ACADEMY ANAPOLIS AVE PLYMOUTH, MN SHEET TITLE: Drawn By: VJH Project Architect: Drawing History/Revisions: Drawing Date: Checked By: APH 03.11.2025 A. PETER HILGER, AIA 2025 RYLAUR, LLCC A301 BUILDING SECTIONS 2 BUILDING SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Project Architect: C 1 BUILDING SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Page 199 of 221 Upper Level 2 11'-7 1/2" Grade Level 1 0'-0" Roof Joist 22'-6" T/Parapet 26'-2" Upper Level 2 11'-7 1/2" Grade Level 1 0'-0" Roof Joist 22'-6" T/Parapet 26'-2" 18d Beam .75" metal deck 1' - 8 " .75" subfloor 1' - 1 0 " 18d Beam 1.5" metal deck 1' - 8 " .75" subfloor 1' - 1 0 " RESTROOMJANITOR 20d Barjoist22d Barjoist 20d Barjoist22d Barjoist Upper Level 2 11'-7 1/2" Grade Level 1 0'-0" Roof Joist 22'-6" T/Parapet 26'-2" .75" metal deck.75" subfloor 24d Beam 21d Beam 18d Beam RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com PROJECT INFORMATION: CLIENT INFORMATION: Sheet No NEW HORIZON ACADEMY ANAPOLIS AVE PLYMOUTH, MN SHEET TITLE: Drawn By: VJH Project Architect: Drawing History/Revisions: Drawing Date: Checked By: APH 03.11.2025 A. PETER HILGER, AIA 2025 RYLAUR, LLCC A302 BUILDING SECTIONS 2 BUILDING SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Project Architect: C 1 BUILDING SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Page 200 of 221 Luminaire Locations No. Label X Y Z Location MH Orientation Tilt X Y Aim Z 1 AA 511162.50 206698.00 20.00 20.00 269.40 0.00 511161.20 206698.00 0.00 3 AA 511204.40 206594.40 20.00 20.00 359.90 0.00 511204.40 206595.70 0.00 4 AA 511286.90 206594.80 20.00 20.00 359.90 0.00 511286.90 206596.10 0.00 5 AA 511318.30 206669.00 20.00 20.00 180.11 0.00 511318.30 206667.70 0.00 1 BB 511200.00 206736.00 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 511200.00 206736.50 0.00 2 BB 511235.10 206736.30 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 511235.10 206736.80 0.00 3 BB 511256.80 206736.40 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 511256.80 206736.90 0.00 4 BB 511182.80 206716.90 10.00 10.00 270.00 0.00 511182.30 206716.90 0.00 5 BB 511230.90 206670.90 10.00 10.00 180.00 0.00 511230.90 206670.40 0.00 6 BB 511188.90 206676.10 10.00 10.00 225.19 0.00 511188.60 206675.70 0.00 7 BB 511278.80 206721.10 10.00 10.00 90.00 0.00 511279.30 206721.10 0.00 8 BB 511278.80 206683.90 10.00 10.00 90.00 0.00 511279.30 206683.90 0.00 Schedule Symbol Label Image Quantity Manufacturer Catalog Number Description Number Lamps Lumens Per Lamp Light Loss Factor Wattage Plot AA 4 NLS LIGHTING NV-1-T4-32L-1-40K7- HSS NV-1 site fixture with version 1 backs shields 1 8235 1 106 BB 8 GARDCO GCS-A01-840-T2M Geoform Wall Sconce - cylinder, 20 LED's, 4000K CCT, TYPE T2M OPTIC, 80CRI 1 1537 1 10.2 Statistics Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min Property LIne 0.2 fc 1.5 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A Site 1.0 fc 4.0 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A 1.5 1.5 1.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.10.10.20.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.10.10.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.6 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.6 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.7 1.2 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.8 3.0 3.3 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.5 2.3 1.9 1.1 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.9 3.5 3.6 3.1 2.6 2.5 2.3 1.8 1.1 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.4 1.9 2.2 2.1 2.6 3.2 3.8 3.4 2.8 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.8 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 1.1 1.9 2.1 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.1 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.4 2.3 1.8 1.3 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.2 1.2 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.9 1.7 2.1 2.0 1.7 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.6 2.2 2.8 2.8 2.2 1.5 0.9 1.2 0.9 0.5 0.2 1.2 2.2 2.5 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.5 2.5 2.8 2.3 1.2 1.0 0.5 0.2 1.2 2.6 2.8 2.5 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.7 2.4 2.7 1.8 1.5 0.7 0.2 1.5 3.1 3.2 2.6 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.0 2.5 2.0 1.0 0.3 1.9 3.7 3.6 2.8 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.2 0.2 2.9 2.4 1.2 0.3 2.0 3.6 2.8 2.2 2.0 2.1 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.4 2.7 2.2 1.1 0.3 1.8 3.6 3.5 2.7 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.6 2.3 1.8 0.9 0.3 1.4 3.0 3.2 2.6 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.6 0.8 0.3 1.2 2.5 2.7 2.4 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.4 1.0 1.5 1.7 2.0 1.6 0.9 0.3 1.2 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.6 1.3 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.0 1.0 0.3 1.2 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.7 1.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 2.4 1.3 0.4 1.1 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.6 1.5 2.4 2.6 3.5 2.9 1.5 0.5 0.9 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.5 1.2 1.8 2.0 3.5 2.9 1.5 0.4 0.7 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.3 3.5 2.8 1.4 0.4 0.8 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 3.4 2.8 1.5 0.4 1.0 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 3.5 2.9 1.5 0.4 1.0 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 3.1 2.6 1.3 0.4 1.0 2.3 2.6 2.5 2.2 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.3 1.9 1.0 0.3 1.0 2.3 2.6 2.4 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 1.6 1.3 0.7 0.2 1.2 2.9 3.1 2.7 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.3 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.1 1.5 3.4 3.5 2.9 2.3 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.7 2.1 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.0 1.6 1.6 2.0 2.5 2.9 2.7 2.1 1.4 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.3 1.7 3.9 3.7 3.0 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.0 1.9 2.5 2.8 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.9 2.3 2.8 2.5 1.9 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.4 0.2 1.7 3.9 3.7 3.0 2.4 2.5 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 1.7 1.3 1.6 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 1.5 3.3 3.4 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.5 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 1.1 2.8 3.0 2.7 2.3 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.6 2.3 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.2 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.9 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.7 2.9 2.7 1.1 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.0 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.8 3.4 3.2 1.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.9 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.4 3.0 3.7 3.8 1.6 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.8 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.2 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.4 2.4 3.0 3.8 1.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.4 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.3 2.9 3.6 3.5 1.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.7 3.1 2.9 1.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.4 1.6 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.5 2.6 2.3 0.9 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.5 2.6 2.3 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.2 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.7 0.8 0.2 0.1 AA @ 20' AA @ 20'AA @ 20' AA @ 20' BB @ 10'BB @ 10'BB @ 10' BB @ 10' BB @ 10' BB @ 10' BB @ 10' BB @ 10' 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 763−585−6757 fax 5430 Douglas Drive North Minneapolis, MN 55429 Email: steen@steeneng.com 763−585−6742 PROJECT INFORMATION: RYLAUR, LLC. 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com ©2025 RYLAUR LLC. CLIENT INFORMATION: SHEET TITLE: DRAFTED: REVIEWED: SHEET DATE: NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 7100 BROOKLYN BLVD. NEW HORIZON ACADEMYANAPOLIS AVE BROOKLYN CENTER, MN PLYMOUTH, MN STEEN # RYL202502 3/ 1 9 / 2 0 2 5 1 1 : 5 5 : 3 8 A M E001 SITE PHOTOMETRICS JLA RDB St a t u s 3/11/25 REVISION SCHEDULE NO DESCRIPTION DATE NOT TO SCALE1Site Photometric Calculations Page 201 of 221 763−585−6757 fax 5430 Douglas Drive North Minneapolis, MN 55429 Email: steen@steeneng.com 763−585−6742 PROJECT INFORMATION: RYLAUR, LLC. 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com ©2025 RYLAUR LLC. CLIENT INFORMATION: SHEET TITLE: DRAFTED: REVIEWED: SHEET DATE: NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 7100 BROOKLYN BLVD. NEW HORIZON ACADEMYANAPOLIS AVE BROOKLYN CENTER, MN PLYMOUTH, MN STEEN # RYL202502 3/ 1 9 / 2 0 2 5 1 1 : 5 5 : 3 8 A M E002 Photometric Cut Sheets JLA RDB St a t u s 3/11/25 REVISION SCHEDULE NO DESCRIPTION DATE Page 202 of 221 Exhibit B Page 203 of 221 Exhibit C Page 204 of 221 Page 205 of 221 Page 206 of 221 Page 207 of 221 Page 208 of 221 Page 209 of 221 Page 210 of 221 Page 211 of 221 Page 212 of 221 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: April 7, 2025 TO: Ginny McIntosh, Planning Manager FROM: Touyia Lee, Principal Engineer SUBJECT: Public Works – Preliminary Site Plan 7100 Brooklyn Blvd – New Horizon Academy Public Works staff reviewed the following documents submitted for review for the proposed 7100 Brooklyn Blvd development known as New Horizon Academy. •2025-03-11 City Submittal This document included the following: o Preliminary Plans Subject to final staff Site Plan approval, the referenced plans must be revised in accordance with the following comments/revisions and approved prior to issuance of any permits. Plan Items C4.0 – Utility Plan 1.Denote all utilities including underground system as private including proposed MH 11. L1 – Landscape Plan 1.Irrigation system as-built must be provided to the city upon completion of work. General Items 2.The total disturbed area is less than one acre, a NPDES permit is not required however a SWPPP plan shall still be implemented. The total disturbed area is less than five acres; the City of Brooklyn Center has reviewed the plans per the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission rules. From preliminary review the applicant has met watershed’s rule requirements. 3.The applicant shall be responsible for coordinating site development plans with all private utility companies (Xcel Energy, CenterPoint Energy, Qwest Communications, Comcast, etc. ) Applicant shall be responsible for verifying all utilities are absent from the easement proposed to be vacated. 4.The City has submitted the plans to Hennepin County for review. Applicant must meet requirements from the review. Agreements 5.During construction of the site improvements, and until the permanent turf and plantings are established, the developer will be required to reimburse the City for the administration and engineering inspection efforts. Please submit a deposit of $5,000 that the City can draw upon. Exhibit D Page 213 of 221 6.A Construction Management Plan and Agreement is required that addresses general construction activities and management provisions, traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions, tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions, definition of responsibility provisions, temporary parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non-compliance provisions. A $5,000 deposit will be required as part of the non-compliance provision. 7.An overall Easement Agreement is required that will provide the City perpetual accessibility to all private utilities and storm drainage areas to inspect and enforce proper utility service and maintenance for the entire site. This easement agreement also includes private inspection, maintenance, and reporting responsibilities. Easements to provide utility service to the development should be dedicated as necessary. 8. Upon project completion, the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures, and provide certified record drawings for any associated private and/or public improvements prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project as determined and directed by the City Engineer. 9.Inspection for the private site improvements must be performed by the developer’s design/project engineer. Upon project completion, the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer’s immediate and direct supervision. The engineer must be certified in the State of Minnesota and must certify all required as-built drawings (which are separate from the as-built survey). Anticipated Permitting 10.A City of Brooklyn Center land disturbance permit is required. 11.A Water and Sewer Permit is required. 12.If applicable, applicant will need to obtain required permits to work in County right-of-way. 13.Other permits not listed herein may be required. It is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain such permits as warranted. Prior to Issuance of Land Alteration 14. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City. 15.Final construction plans and specification must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer. The final construction plans must be certified by a licensed engineer in the state of Minnesota. 16.The Construction Management Plan and Agreement has been executed and the associated separate cash escrow has been deposited with the City. 17.A preconstruction conference is scheduled and held with City staff and other entities designated by the City. All aforementioned items, comments and recommendations are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Subsequent approval of the final plan may require additional modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design as established by the City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans. Page 214 of 221 City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3300 | www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org Community Development 763-569-3330 April 4, 2025 7100 Brooklyn Blvd Building Building review comments for newly proposed Daycare Building to be located at 7100 Brooklyn Blvd. 1.Prior to a building permit being issued, a SAC determination for the new building will need to be done by MET Council and SAC determination letter received. 2. Separate permits and signed plans required for Building, Mechanical, Plumbing & Electrical. A Fire sprinkler and Fire alarm permit with plans is required to be submitted to the Building Department for this building review. The Community Development Department must be contacted on all proposed exterior signage for this building as permits are required. 3. Fire Hydrant located at East end of parking lot shall not be obstructed. City ordinance requires a minimum of 20’ ft clearance around hydrant. City Ordinance 5-113. 4. Exterior egress stairs provided from lower level shall be provided with a guardrail to protect the occupants located in the play area from falling. 5. The building will be required to have a sprinkler system installed if not already installed. City of Brooklyn Center Ordinance 3-101 B. (2) as adopted by the Minnesota State Building code 1306 Special Fire Protection system 1306.0020 Subp. 2, Existing and New buildings. 6.Hennepin County Health Department shall approve the kitchen area located in the basement prior to any City permits being issued. 7.Plumbing plans where more than 5 fixtures are added/relocated shall be reviewed by the Department of Labor and Industry Plumbing Department. All submitted documents shall be signed as required by Minnesota State Statues. 8. Building plans to be submitted to the City Building Department for review. If any items need to be addressed, comments will be provided in a plan review letter addressed to the architect of record. Exhibit E Page 215 of 221 City of Brooklyn Center | 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 | (763) 569-3300 | www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org 9. Trash enclosure shall be screened by an opaque fence per city ordinance 12-713. Sincerely, Dan Grinsteinner Building Official City of Brooklyn Center 763-569-3313 Page 216 of 221 • Exhibit F Page 217 of 221 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2025-002 FOR A MAJOR SITE AND BUILDING PLAN AMENDMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CONVERSION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 14,000-SQUARE FOOT FORMER CREDIT UNION TO A NEW HORIZON ACADEMY EARLY LEARNING CENTER (7100 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD) WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2025-002, submitted by New Horizon Academy (“the Applicant”) requests review and consideration of an application for approval of a major site and building plan amendment and issuance of a conditional use permit to convert an approximately 14,000-square foot former credit union to a Licensed Day Care Facility—13 or greater persons at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard (“the Subject Property”), as legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and of which would allow for the re-use of the property as a New Horizon Academy; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property sits on approximately 0.99 acres and the MX-N2 (Neighborhood Mixed-Use 2) District where the Subject Property is located allows for Licensed Day Care Facilities—13 or greater persons through issuance of a conditional use permit, as identified within Section 35-4103 (Allowed Use Table); and WHEREAS, Section 35-7605 (Amendments) provides that a major amendment to an approved site and building plan shall be triggered under certain outlined scenarios, including but not limited to a 20 percent or greater change in the number of parking spaces provided or required or change in the ground area covered by the project, or a 25 percent or greater change in the floor area use of any one structure, and City staff determined this threshold had been met; and WHEREAS, a public hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on March 27, 2025, mail notifications were sent to adjacent property owners and physical properties, and notices were provided for on the City’s website and via a weekly bulletin; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota held a duly noticed and called public hearing on April 10, 2025, whereby a planning staff report was presented and public testimony regarding the proposed building and site modifications and conditional use permit were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota considered the major site and building plan amendment and conditional use permit requests in light of all testimony received, the guidelines and standards for evaluating the conditional use permit contained in Sections 35-7600 (Site & Building Plan Approval) and 35-7700 (Conditional Use Permit), the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, as well as information provided by the Applicant with respect to the proposed use’s operations and any potential impacts, and the request generally satisfies the criteria as outlined within the above Sections; and Page 218 of 221 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows regarding Planning Commission Application No. 2025-002, as submitted by Applicant New Horizon Academy: a) The proposed use, in terms of intensity, is substantially similar in nature to, or a less intense use with respect to other permitted and conditional uses within the MX-N2 District, including retail operations, and the Subject Property’s previous operation as a financial institution with standalone ATM, and its potential impacts on the surrounding community as a Day Care Facility are addressed through documentation provided by the Applicant; b) The conditional use, as proposed, will be in accordance with the general objectives of the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the City’s Unified Development Ordinance given the Subject Property’s future land use designation under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is “Neighborhood Mixed Use” (N-MU) and the Subject Property’s zoning designation of Neighborhood Mixed-Use 2 (MX-N2) District allows for Licensed Daycare Facilities—13 or greater person through issuance of a conditional use permit; c) The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will promote or enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, or comfort; d) The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood, and the Applicant intends conduct a full remodel of the interior building space and undertake exterior site modifications, including installation of three new play areas that would be located at the north end of the Subject Property and away from the neighboring Boulevard Plaza office condominiums to the south; e) The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district; f) Adequate measures have been taken to provide ingress, egress, and parking so designated as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets, and the Applicant has submitted plans to remove parking deemed unnecessary for their operations, as supported through a traffic study developed for prototypical, 85- percent occupied New Horizon Academy facilities; g) Impacts such as noise, hours of activity, and exterior light have been either sufficiently addressed to mitigate impacts on nearby uses, or will be addressed as an identified condition of approval; and h) The conditional use will conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that it hereby approves Planning Commission Application No. 2025- 002 for approval of a major site and building plan amendment and conditional use permit for Page 219 of 221 RESOLUTION NO. renovation of a former credit union and office building located at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard to an approximately 14,000-square foot New Horizon Academy early learning center (Licensed Daycare Facilities—13 or greater persons), and conditioned on compliance with all of the following: 1. The Applicant shall adhere to the provisions as outlined under Section 35-7700 (Conditional Use Permits) and coordinate with City staff to file a copy of the City Council resolution approving the requested conditional use permit, along with a legal description of the Subject Property for which the permit was issued, and list of any conditions set forth by City Council as a condition of said conditional use permit. A certified resolution shall be recorded by the Applicant with the Hennepin County Recorder—Registrar of Titles pending approval of the related application. a. The Day Care Facility shall maintain a valid license and a copy of said license and application shall be submitted to the City annually. Failure to maintain a license shall be subject to the conditions outlined under Section 35-7700. 2. Any major changes or modifications made to the Site and Building Plan, and as outlined within the City Code, can only be made by an amendment to the approved Site and Building Plan as approved by the City Council. a. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official and as outlined in the memorandum dated April 4, 2025 with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. b. The Applicant shall apply for and obtain separate City approval for the vacation and dedication of certain easements located on the Subject Property. c. A SAC Determination shall be submitted by the Applicant to the Metropolitan Council for the change of use and any associated fees paid at the time of any permit issuance. d. Photometric Plans and any proposed lighting fixtures are to comply with Section 35-5400 (Exterior Lighting). e. The Applicant shall ensure an irrigation system is in place to facilitate maintenance of new and existing site landscaping and green areas, and irrigation shop drawings for any new systems shall be submitted for review and approval prior to installation. 3. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view per City Code requirements and a detail sheet provided. a. Per City Code requirements, the proposed trash enclosure shall be located a minimum of five (5) feet from the interior and rear property lines, provide a minimum 20-foot clearance from an existing fire hydrant located on City property, and the area shall be striped for no parking. 4. The Applicant shall work to ensure all applicable Minnesota Fire Code requirements have been met as part of any site plan approval and with respect to the proposed modifications to the building. a. A fire sprinkler system is required to be installed and shall be maintained on Page 220 of 221 RESOLUTION NO. a consistent basis per City Code requirements. 5. The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the Principal Engineer’s review memorandum, dated April 4, 2025. 6. Application to and approval from the Hennepin County Health Department as needed for the proposed kitchen area. 7. The Applicant shall submit a Sign Permit Application for any proposed signage (e.g., wall, freestanding) and receive issuance of a permit prior to any installation. Signage shall comply with the City of Brooklyn Center sign code provisions for a Neighborhood Mixed-Use District property. April 28, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 221 of 221