Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2025.06.09 CCP REGULAR
CITY COUNCIL MEETING City Hall Council Chambers June 9, 2025 AGENDA 1. Call to Order - 7:00 p.m. Attendees please turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full meeting packet is available in the binder at the entrance to the Council Chambers. 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Informal Open Forum This is an opportunity for the public to address the City Council on items that are not on the agenda. It is limited to 15 minutes. It may not be used to make personal attacks, air personal grievances, make political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with the presenter. Questions from the Council will be for clarification purposes only. It will not be used as a time for problem-solving or reacting to the comments made but for hearing the presenter for informational purposes only. The first call will be for those that have notified the Clerk that they would like to speak during the open forum and then ask if anyone connected to this meeting would like to speak. When called upon, please indicate your name and then proceed. Please be sure to state your name before speaking. a. Meeting Decorum 5. Invocation - Jerzak 6. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda These items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There isn't a separate discussion for these items unless a Councilmember so requests, then it is moved to the end of the Council Consideration Items. a. Approval of Minutes b. Approval of Licenses c. Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Letter of Engagement with Carson, Clelland & Schreder Law Firm for Legal Services d. Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Contract Extension with Kennedy & Graven, Chartered Law Firm for Legal Services e. Canceling and Re-Assessing Special Assessments for 6030 Vincent Ave N to Hennepin County Tax Rolls (BC Little League Fields) 7. Presentations/Proclamations/Recognitions/Donations Page 1 of 96 a. Proclamation - June 19th, Juneteenth b. Proclamation in Celebration of Colors of Southeast Asia (COSA) Fest c. Proclamation recognizing June 2025 as LGBTQIA+ Pride Month in the City of Brooklyn Center d. Public Works Update e. Community Development Annual Report 8. Public Hearings 9. Planning Commission Items 10. Council Consideration Items 11. Council Report 12. Adjournment Page 2 of 96 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 6/9/2025 TO: City Council FROM: THROUGH: BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes Requested Council Action: Background: Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2025.05.27 SS - unapproved 2. 2025.05.27 CC - unapproved 3. 2025.05.27 WS - unapproved Page 3 of 96 5/27/25 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION MAY 27, 2025 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session called to order by Mayor April Graves at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor April Graves and Councilmembers Dan Jerzak, Teneshia Kragness, and Laurie Ann Moore. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards, Interim City Clerk Shannon Pettit, and City Attorney Siobhan Tolar. Councilmember Kris Lawrence-Anderson was excused. CITY COUNCIL MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION ITEMS Councilmember Jerzak stated he submitted two corrections for the meeting minutes to Staff. One was correcting the name of the Councilmember who testified at the Capitol. The other correction was changing the word from “sunset” to “daylight.” Councilmember Kragness stated for the May 5, 2025 minutes on page 55 of 160 in the fourth paragraph, she requests that the word “material” be changed to “shrinkage.” For the May 12, 2025 minutes, she requested a change to her comments about the hotel owners’ focus on profits over the guests. She stated she was misquoted. Councilmember Jerzak noted the community has shown interest in having the Study Session recorded on CCX. He explained he would like to discuss the possibility further. Mayor Graves stated she would like for the Study Session to be on CCX. Councilmember Moore stated she would prefer to talk about the Code of Respect before changing the CCX recordings, though she isn’t opposed to the idea. She explained she thought the recording was posted online. Mayor Graves stated it used to be posted online, but they decided to stop posting it. CODE OF RESPECT Page 4 of 96 5/27/25 -2- DRAFT City Manager Reggie Edwards explained that the proposed changes are a response to Council comments. The document prioritizes collaborative behavior and having a shared path forward. The effort is intended to be restorative. He commended the Council on their idea to create a Code of Respect instead of a Code of Conduct. City Attorney Siobhan Tolar reiterated that she implemented recommendations from the Council and softened the language. The idea is for the Council to agree to the Code of Respect, which details how they will treat one another. Ms. Tolar noted there is a pathway for both sanctions and restoration. On page 11, there are accountability measures. The bulk of substantive changes were in the accountability measures. There is an agreement to attempt restorative efforts prior to employing sanctions. Within sanctions, there is a warning, then a reprimand, then censure. Factors that will be considered in determining the appropriate restorative measure or sanction may include the seriousness of the violation and the number of preceding violations. Ms. Tolar pointed out that she created a grid to act as a visual guide for the violation tier, restorative measures, and sanction steps. For example, a first violation may be a “Disrespectful or offensive comment to Council Member, constituent, appointed official, or staff”. The restorative measure would be a “Private conversation amongst the parties with or without a mediator to try to resolve the issue; parties resolve the issue in public.” If the restorative step fails, then the process may escalate to a sanction such as a “public verbal warning from the presiding officer.” Ms. Tolar stated a second violation example could be, “Continued disrespectful exchanges with same or different Council Member, constituent, appointed official, or staff.” The restorative measure would be, “Public conversation at study or work session regarding behavior and potential causes and solutions; Offending Party attempts to resolve the issue by offering solutions for corrective behavior; Parties resolve the issue in public. If the Offending Party cannot agree to resolution, then move to step 2.” The second step of a sanction would be “Reprimand via Written Letter approved by Council, signed by the Mayor or Pro Tem.” Ms. Tolar further explained that a third minor or moderate violation may be “continued disrespectful comments/exchanges with Council Member, constituent, appointed official, or staff” after the first and second violations. There is no prescribed restorative measure. Instead, the prescribed sanction would be “Public censure via Council resolution.” Councilmember Moore noted the terms “restorative” and “sanction” remind her of a criminal code of conduct. She asked if there is a consensus of the Council before any violations are carried out. Ms. Tolar stated that the Council may decide if a consensus is required. There is a procedure by which someone may complain, and there is an investigation process. The grid merely illustrates a violation and potential responses. Ms. Tolar pointed out that Tier 2 violations are moderate to severe violations and may be Page 5 of 96 5/27/25 -3- DRAFT considered inappropriate. For example, “directing staff to investigate a constituent matter unknown to Council or City Manager” would qualify as a moderate to severe violation. The restorative step would include a “public conversation regarding behavior at study or work session” and the “offending party issues a verbal public apology to those involved. If that step fails, the sanction would be “reprimand via written letter approved by Council, signed by the Mayor or Pro Tem.” Ms. Tolar noted another Tier 2 violation could be if a Councilmember were to “publicly endorse political candidate at a Council meeting.” The restorative measure is a “public conversation regarding behavior at work or study session.” If that step fails, the sanction would be an “immediate verbal public reprimand by Presiding Official; reprimand via written letter from approved by Council, signed by Mayor or Pro Tem.” Ms. Tolar added the third Tier 2 violation example is if a Councilmember were to “misrepresent a City position / Speak on behalf of the City with no Council consensus on the matter at hand.” For a third violation, there is no restorative measure. Instead, the prescribed sanction is a “public censure via Council resolution.” Ms. Tolar stated a Tier 3 violation is categorized as egregious which may include clear misconduct or violation of the law. The example in the grid is, “Use profane language toward Council member(s), staff, constituent, appointed official; After investigation, found to have violated Minnesota Government Data Practices Act.” There is no restorative step. Instead, the sanction would be a censure or applicable criminal consequence. Ms. Tolar pointed out she compared the document to the Charter, and she noted whenever the document overlapped with the Charter. The complaint process details ethics and various procedures, which are also mentioned in the drafted Code of Respect. Mayor Graves thanked Staff for their work on the item. Councilmember Kragness expressed her appreciation of Staff’s work and the softening of the language. Councilmember Jerzak noted his agreement with Councilmember Kragness. He stated on page 15 of 19, he suggested that reporting a potential violation to the City Attorney may be added, referring to item b. He offered the same suggestion for the Investigation Procedure portion of the Code of Respect. Councilmember Jerzak explained Staff must abide by a Code of Conduct. He asked if the Council may report a Staff violation of their Code of Conduct, similar to Staff’s ability to report the Council per item 4b. Ms. Tolar pointed out that page five addresses Staff Criticism and allows for Councilmembers to express concerns about Staff privately to the City Manager. Councilmember Jerzak stated he understands the purpose of item 10i. Personal Attacks. He stated the “tone of voice” may be difficult to enforce without bias, as some people speak more passionately or loudly than others. Page 6 of 96 5/27/25 -4- DRAFT Mayor Graves stated the item doesn’t require people to know every cultural difference or preference. Instead, the aim is for Councilmembers to be self-aware. Someone disliking another’s tone of voice doesn’t rise to the level of a violation. It is a different consideration if a certain tone of voice is used consistently over time. Councilmember Jerzak pointed out he wants to maintain the opportunity for a public apology, such as, “Madam Mayor, I apologize if my comments were disrespectful.” Sometimes his directness and passion come off as intimidating, but he is well-intentioned. His goal is to remain respectful while maintaining his passion and directness. Mayor Graves agreed she would like for Councilmembers to communicate their concerns or feelings of disrespect at the moment when appropriate. Similarly, it would stand to reason that another individual may express their apology as an immediate response. Councilmember Jerzak stated he supports the document as a whole. He stated he would like for the Code of Respect and similar documents for Staff and Commissioners to be voted on altogether. Councilmember Moore pointed out Personal Attacks are mentioned on three separate pages. She explained she doesn’t like the term “personal attack” in a Code of Respect document. Folks have previously expressed that rolling one’s eyes is disrespectful, or body language is deemed disrespectful. She learned that she received a complaint against her as a Commissioner for rolling her eyes and raising her voice. Ultimately, cultural differences, body language, tone of voice, and the like are too subjective. She noted she has felt disrespected in her role as a Councilmember, and she has been accused of being disrespectful. Councilmember Moore stated the language of restorative practices is off-putting because of its connotation related to criminal acts. The illustrations in the grid are helpful and much appreciated. The document doesn’t address a requirement for Council to reach consensus about which tier a certain action may fall under. A constituent recently commented on eye-rolling, and the incident was subjective. The communication needs to be more clear. Councilmember Moore added the Councilmembers were elected to represent the community in a respectful way and to make important decisions regarding tax dollars. While she isn’t opposed to the Code of Respect, there is ambiguous language. Also, the Mayor or presiding officer has sole authority to impose a restorative step or sanction. Ms. Tolar explained if someone were to believe there was a Code of Respect violation, they may report it to the City Manager, for example. The City Manager would participate in fact-finding to determine if there was a violation. The next step would be a notice and hearing. The Investigation Procedure is detailed on page 15 of 19. Only when a sanction is imposed, then the Council may vote and discuss a letter of reprimand or censure. A reprimand or censure would require a public hearing and consensus of the Council. Page 7 of 96 5/27/25 -5- DRAFT Councilmember Moore stated she went through the process as a Commissioner, and she never received information on the conclusion. Ms. Tolar stated the Code of Respect addresses Councilmember conduct. Councilmember Moore explained she received a complaint from a Councilmember while she was not on the Council. Mayor Graves stated that is not where the complaint came from. Councilmember Moore stated she didn’t know where the complaint came from. Councilmember Moore asked how that process fits into the Code of Respect. Ms. Tolar explained the complaint process acts as a sort of funnel of information. The Council can make a decision for a complaint’s fact-finding process to include the Council, though the accused party wouldn’t be included in the fact-finding effort. Councilmember Jerzak stated he is comfortable with the City Attorney’s proposed document and answers to the Council’s questions. Councilmember Kragness agreed that the reporting process and investigation process be the same. Whoever receives the report should be the one to determine the next step. Once the severity is determined, it can go to the Council. Ms. Tolar pointed out the point of restoration is for the offending party to participate in the resolution. A sanction may be imposed if the offending party is uninterested or unwilling to participate in a restorative effort. Ms. Tolar added the language for the “Personal Attacks” is not new; it is merely softened. The piece lives in each section so it would apply to different situations and involved parties. Councilmember Kragness noted her appreciation of the language because it clearly indicates that tone of voice may be inappropriate. Mayor Graves stated the Council has shown overall support for the Code of Respect. They will hold off on voting on the item until similar documents for Staff and Commissions are reviewed. Councilmember Jerzak asked if the Council supported his idea to add the City Attorney to the list of folks who may receive a complaint. Councilmember Kragness stated it seemed like it was just a typo because the City Attorney was listed as a receiving party throughout the document except for in one section. Mayor Graves noted she agreed with the City Attorney being a party eligible to receive a complaint. PROPOSED BUDGET SCHEDULE Page 8 of 96 5/27/25 -6- DRAFT Dr. Edwards explained the schedule was provided to the Council. The presentations were further spread out. Each meeting is a shorter period of time. Two sessions were added. The Council expressed interest in a priority-setting conversation, which is included in the schedule. Dr. Edwards pointed out that the schedule currently calls for an audit presentation on June 30, 2025. However, the auditor is unavailable on that date. The Council will receive the audit prior to June 30, which is on schedule. Staff suggests that the audit presentation be scheduled for July 7, 2025. The budget overview and levy discussion can also be held on that date. Councilmember Moore stated the June 30, 2025, date could be eliminated to add the July 7, 2025, meeting. Dr. Edwards stated the priorities will be discussed on June 9, 2025. Mayor Graves stated she would be willing to meet on July 7, 2025. Councilmember Kragness asked if the June 30, 2025, meeting would be eliminated should they agree to meet on July 7, 2025. Dr. Edwards stated July 7, 2025, is the most important. If the Council isn’t agreeable to June 30, 2025, then that meeting will go away. Councilmember Jerzak noted the previous minutes indicate that the Council had the option to move the audit up. However, Staff keeps pushing back the audit presentation. Dr. Edwards explained the City can move up the audit process in future years but not for the current year. The audit will still be provided to the Council as scheduled. Mayor Graves stated the audit presentation is being pushed back. Dr. Edwards stated the presentation is being pushed off by only one week. Councilmember Kragness pointed out that July 7, 2025, is the Monday following a holiday weekend. Dr. Edwards stated the audit presentation can be received whenever the Council desires after June 30, 2025. Councilmember Moore suggested the audit presentation be included on July 14, 2025, with the regularly scheduled meeting. Dr. Edwards stated he would confer with the auditors to confirm their availability. Mayor Graves stated it was the consensus of the Council to move the audit presentation to July 14, 2025. Councilmember Moore reiterated the Council is interested in moving up the audit timeline. Dr. Edwards explained that historically, the earliest the City has received the audit is the first week of June. Staff will work with the auditor to move up the audit timeline in the future. Page 9 of 96 5/27/25 -7- DRAFT Councilmember Kragness pointed out that Brooklyn Center has solid financials, so the audit itself isn’t providing new information. They can rely on the City’s financial reports because the audit has not shown material differences. Dr. Edwards reiterated that the Council will receive the audit on schedule. Councilmember Moore noted the Council hasn’t received any quarterly financials. Dr. Edwards stated the Council has sent out monthly financials for three of the five months. They don’t typically provide a report for the first month as Staff’s focus is preparing for the audit during that time. Staff has committed to the goal of providing quarterly financial reports in the future. Mayor Graves asked if the Council will still be meeting on June 30, 2025. Dr. Edwards stated he needs to schedule a time with Mayor Graves to discuss 360 and that process. June 30 was already on the schedule for Council, so they want to make use of that date somehow. CITY MANAGER MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION ITEMS BAYMONT INN & SUITES UPDATE City Manager Reggie Edwards explained that the intention is to help Baymont to move as quickly as possible. It is in the City’s best interest for Baymont’s business to be up and running. There is the topic of a reinstatement fee. Council may consider implementing a reinstatement fee as a Council Consideration Item. If it were passed and the conditions of the temporary license were resolved, the owner could go through the administrative process to have their license reinstated without using more of Council’s time. The recommended reinstatement fee is $300, which is 1.5 times the initial fee. The item would also authorize Staff to renew the license through an administrative process to save time for all parties. Baymont is not allowed to have new guests until the license is renewed. Councilmember Jerzak pointed out he thoroughly reviewed the resolution and met with Dr. Edwards one-on-one. The Council doesn’t want to put anyone out of business. However, they need to maintain City Code. There was a passionate email received from the owner. As long as the Baymont is in compliance with City regulations, then they should be able to operate their business. Councilmember Kragness noted her support of the $300 fee. It will also hold Staff accountable to support the Baymont in returning to operations. Councilmember Moore expressed her agreement with the other comments. It was the consensus of the Council to support the recommended $300 restatement fee. Dr. Edwards asked if the item could be moved to the Consent Agenda, should there be a unanimous agreement. Councilmember Jerzak asked if they are required to have a unanimous decision of all Page 10 of 96 5/27/25 -8- DRAFT five Councilmembers to move an item to the Consent Agenda. Dr. Edwards stated it requires unanimous support by all present Councilmembers. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to close the Study Session at 6:59 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Page 11 of 96 5/2725 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION MAY 27, 2025 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor April Graves at 6:59 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Mayor April Graves and Councilmembers Dan Jerzak, Teneshia Kragness, and Laurie Ann Moore. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards, Planning and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh, City Planner Krystin Eldridge, Interim City Clerk Shannon Pettit, and City Attorney Siobhan Tolar. Councilmember Kris Lawrence-Anderson was excused. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 4. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM Mayor April Graves opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum and reviewed the Rules of Decorum. Julie B. thanked Brooklyn Center employee Sam Francis for his patience and informative interaction with her mother. She pointed out Jennifer Olson is always a bright spot at City Hall. Julie B. added Shannon Pettit has been extremely helpful and flexible in her new role. Chief Flesland has also been helpful. Mary M. requested Brooklyn Center consider a humane pet store ordinance for the City. 12 other cities in Minnesota have enacted a similar ordinance. The majority of cats and dogs being sold at pet stores are sourced from inhumane breeders. The ordinance would require local pet stores to stop selling cats and dogs. They don’t want to shut down any pet stores; instead, the goal is to focus on selling pet supplies and goods rather than live animals. Mayor Graves thanked Mary M. for the comments and requested that more details be emailed to the Council. Kevin S. noted his appreciation for changes in the Brooklyn Center Police Department. They went from the death of a resident every 18 months to no deaths for three or four years. He has been Page 12 of 96 5/27/25 -2- DRAFT interacting with them more because they have been assisting with his group home neighbors. The officers have been cordial and respectful to group home residents. Kevin S. added he spoke with Director of Community Prevention, Health, and Safety LaToya Turk about the work the alternative response teams are doing. Their services are beneficial for Brooklyn Center’s less fortunate people. Nahid K. thanked Council for their participation in meetings and for representing the City of Brooklyn Center. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Moore seconded to close the Informal Open Forum at 7:09 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 5. INVOCATION Councilmember Kragness shared a quote from Zero Dean, “Teamwork sits alongside trust, communication, and tolerance as a building block of the best relationships. Teamwork is not “What can I get out of this relationship?” it's “What can I bring to this relationship to make it better?” Teamwork is the combined commitment to overcome obstacles. It’s support. It’s encouragement. It’s working together. It’s rising to the challenge of bettering yourself for the benefit of the whole. It’s providing the support and encouragement necessary to help others better themselves and succeed in their endeavors.” 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda, as amended, with amendments to the minutes as stated during the Study Session and adding 6e. Resolution authorizing the reinstatement fee for Baymont Inn and Suites and authorizing the City of Brooklyn Center to approve and issue the hospitality accommodations license, to the Consent Agenda, and the following consent items were approved: 6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. May 5, 2025 – Study Session 2. May 5, 2025 – Regular Session 3. May 5, 2025 – EDA/Work Session 4. May 12, 2025 – Study Session 5. May 12, 2025 – Regular Session 6b. LICENSES AMUSEMENT DEVICES American Legion 6110 Brooklyn Boulevard Page 13 of 96 5/27/25 -3- DRAFT FIREWORKS - TEMPORARY Renissance Fireworks 6211 Brooklyn Boulevard GARBAGE HAULER Midwest Grease 220 Ponderosa Road Redwood Falls 56283 MECHANICAL A&E Heating & Air Conditioning 1841 161st Lane NE, Ham Lake 55304 Air Comfort Htg & A/C 19170 Jasper St NW, Anoka 55303 Aquarius Water Conditioning 3180 Country Drive, Little Canada 55117 C & M Heating and Air Conditioning Inc. 7308 Blair Way, Wahkon 56386 Egan Company 11611 Business Park Boulevard, Champlin 55316 GV Heating & Air Inc. 5182 West Broadway, Crystal 55429 Highland Plumbing 718 8th Street NW, Buffalo 55313 Ideal Air, LLC 17900 Aztec Street NW, Andover 55304 Majestic Custom Heating 8800 Royal Court NW, & Air Conditioning Anoka 55303 Optimal Heating and Cooling LLC 5912 Washburn Avenue N, Brooklyn Center 55430 R A Ungerman Construction Co., Inc. 14000 21st Ave N, Plymouth 55447 Residential Heating and Air, Inc.Page 7454 Washington Avenue S, Eden Prairie 55344 Page 14 of 96 5/27/25 -4- DRAFT Scotts Heating & A/C LLC 2846 Bradshaw Circle S, Buffalo 55313 Shac, LLC 1240 Trapp Rd. Suite A., Eagan 55121 United Heating & A/C Inc. 132 Broadway Street E, Osseo 55369 RENTAL INITIAL (TYPE IV – six-month license) 6807 Humboldt Avenue N B & V Partnership LLC INITIAL (TYPE III – one-year license) 5250 Lakeside Place TMJ Properties LLC INITIAL (TYPE I – three-year license) 6539 Drew Avenue N BM Davis and CH Avitabile RENEWAL (TYPE III – one-year license) 4408 69th Avenue N Dmow Llc 6116 Aldrich Avenue N BRIDGE SFR IV SEED BWR LLC 6628 Camden Drive Wells Bovard RENEWAL (TYPE II – two-year license) 1302 69th Avenue N Aeon Holdings Llc 6220 France Avenue N Ewing Square Acquisition Partners,LP 6130 Scott Avenue N 2017 1 Ih Borrower L P 7201 Riverdale Road G PERSAUD & M PERSAUD RENEWAL (TYPE I – three-year license) 7018 Brooklyn Blvd Mains'l Communities Llc 2801 67th La N P J Carey & M J Carey 3318 Mumford Road Beng Thao & Xong Thao 4900 Zenith Avenue N Ih2 Property Illinois Lp Met Requirements Page 15 of 96 5/27/25 -5- DRAFT 6424 Toledo Avenue N HENNEPIN RP FUNDING LLC 7018 Drew Avenue N Michael Bocko SIGNHANGER DeMars Signs 410 93rd Ave, Coon Rapids 55433 Fastsigns Maple Grove-Osseo 300 Central Ave, Osseo 55369 6c. RESOLUTION NO. 2025-053 ACKNOWLEDGING AWARDED FUNDS FROM THE METROPOLITAN REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL (MRAC) AND AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FUNDS 6d. COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS 6e. RESOLUTION NO. 2025-054 AUTHORIZING THE REINSTATEMENT FEE FOR BAYMONT INN AND SUITES AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TO APPROVE AND ISSUE THE HOSPITALITY ACCOMMODATIONS LICENSE Motion passed unanimously. 7. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS 7a. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY 252 / I-94 EIS PROJECT UPDATE Dr. Edwards introduced the item and invited Amber Blanchard, representative of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), to continue the presentation. Ms. Blanchard showed a map of the project locations, one of which is Hwy 252 between Hwy 610 in Brooklyn Park and I-94/I-694 in Brooklyn Center. The other project area is I-94 between I- 94/I-694 in Brooklyn Park and North 4th Street and North 3rd Street in downtown Minneapolis. Ms. Blanchard stated the project is in the environmental impact portion. MnDOT has finished the recommendation for the phase regarding whether Hwy 252 should go over or under the local roadways. The next step is to consider Hwy 252 Access Combinations. Following that, the step of Hwy 252/I-94 Mainline Options is the final part of the environmental phase of the overall process. Ms. Blanchard noted Brooklyn Center received $17 million for the 66th Avenue interchange and $1.9 million for the 70th Avenue pedestrian overpass. Hennepin County has received $7 million for the 85th Avenue roadway interchange, and Brooklyn Park has received $10 million for the Brookdale Drive interchange. Overall, the Hwy 252/I-94 project has received $114 million. She Page 16 of 96 5/27/25 -6- DRAFT pointed out that the Corridors of Commerce were replaced with Mobility funds which are more flexible. Ms. Blanchard explained there have been some changes in Federal Executive Orders that have impacted the project. On February 11, 1994, Presidential EO 12898 established Environmental Justice. On January 21, 2025, EO 14173 revoked EO 12898 which removed environmental justice and equity from project considerations. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) removed environmental justice as a criterion in the evaluation criteria memo. However, MnDOT’s commitments have not changed. MnDOT is actively working to refine how equity, EJ, community needs, and MnDOT’s values will continue to be incorporated into its processes. MnDOT’s vision, mission, values, scoping, and equity health priorities have not changed. Ms. Blanchard reminded the Council that MnDOT recommended that Hwy 252 go over local road intersections. This method was recommended because of fewer property impacts including relocations, fewer direct impacts on community facilities, a reduction in stormwater impacts, and a reduction in potential biological resources impacts in many areas, and is consistent with stated objectives from the Policy Advisory Committee (PAC). The trade-off is a noise increase. Ms. Blanchard pointed out MnDOT has heard concerns about noise and preferences for the “under” alternative. MnDOT will look for mitigation options during the next phase of the project. Ms. Blanchard stated MnDOT studied how each access combination affects local roadways. They assessed safety, emergency response, traffic, walking and biking, transit, and City maintenance. The overall goal is to improve vehicle safety, vehicle mobility, emergency response times, pedestrian and bicycle safety and mobility, and transit accessibility on local roads. Ms. Blanchard added that MnDOT also studied how well each access combination addressed the project needs and the access combinations’ impacts on social, environmental, and economic criteria. Ms. Blanchard showed a table summarizing the access combination performance. Factors listed include safety, vehicle mobility, transit travel time, likely transit users and accessibility, bike and pedestrian safety, bike and pedestrian mobility and comfort, improved emergency response time, consistency with proposed future land uses and function of access location cross street, potential impacts to businesses and commercial activities, potential property relocations, potential project cost, community facilities, acreage of potential right of way acquisition, and potential property tax impacts. They weighed the factors of accessibility of likely transit users, improved emergency response time, consistency with proposed future land uses and function of access location cross street, potential impacts to businesses and commercial activities, and potential property relocations more heavily, which showed that access combination option one would be the most beneficial. Ms. Blanchard showed images comparing the various access combinations along with the no-build alternative. Page 17 of 96 5/27/25 -7- DRAFT Ms. Blanchard explained the benefits of Hwy 252 “over” and the first access combination include Hwy 252 crash reductions of approximately 50 percent for vehicles, bikes, and pedestrians, Hwy 252 improved travel time for vehicles and transit along Hwy 252 and bikes or pedestrians crossing Hwy 252, safer crossings for bikes and pedestrians under Hwy 252, a general reduction in traffic on local roads, reduced emergency response time to neighborhoods by two minutes on average, access to and from Hwy 252 being consistent with City land uses, and a minimized number of relocations. Ms. Blanchard pointed out there is likely to be additional traffic on 65th and 66th Avenue. A potential mitigation is to incorporate spot safety and to construct improvements on 65th and 66th Avenue. There are two potential business relocations and five potential residential locations, and MnDOT is looking for ways to mitigate those situations. Similarly, the potential relocations may have an impact on the tax base. The proposed project would also have increased noise levels, and MnDOT will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of noise walls. Ms. Blanchard reiterated that MnDOT has been and will continue to be in the community which has helped build relationships and get more in-depth on the issues. They acknowledge that both the community and Council have concerns. The plan is not perfect, and there will always be tradeoffs. Ultimately, MnDOT welcomes questions and assistance in assessing the data. She invited the community to join in the virtual table talk and the scheduled in-person open houses. Ms. Blanchard noted they hope to wrap up phase 1b regarding access combinations before the fall. From there, they will begin phase 2 regarding the Hwy 252 and I-94 mainline. Mayor Graves thanked Ms. Blanchard for the presentation. Councilmember Jerzak stated the Council has received a memo stating that MnDOT has recommitted to equity and environmental justice. The environmental impacts on the City are serious. The fair share payments have not been addressed. It is laughable that Brooklyn Center may be responsible for more than $25 million as it would virtually bankrupt the City. Councilmember Jerzak noted he brought up concerns at a recent PAC meeting. He asked how the project would be reconciled if the Federal government doesn’t provide funding. Councilmember Jerzak also asked what the benefit is for Brooklyn Center. Ms. Blanchard explained MnDOT is just starting to discuss the cost-sharing portion of the project, and their cost-sharing policy itself is undergoing changes. The policy changes will be implemented before any construction begins. Some of the changes will be substantial. Ms. Blanchard stated they may need to delay the project if they are lacking funding. Alternatively, they may seek out the funds later on in the project timeline. Ms. Blanchard added community wellness is a separate track of the project, and MnDOT wants to fund that portion of the project regardless of Federal funding. Page 18 of 96 5/27/25 -8- DRAFT Councilmember Jerzak explained that MnDOT can say whatever it wants, but he has not seen anything in writing committing to environmental justice and equity. Mayor Graves noted she would be interested in more information on MnDOT’s interest in community wellness. Brooklyn Center is committed to environmental justice. Mayor Graves pointed out air quality will be assessed during a future phase, but it seems like a rather large unknown. She asked why air quality is considered so late in the process. She also asked how the air quality and pollution will be quantified and compared. Ms. Blanchard stated air quality will be analyzed for all ten alternatives. Brooklyn Center has experienced 40 years of signalized highway; the stop-and-go traffic results in emissions. MnDOT is looking at what freeway options may entail. There will be more volume of traffic, but there will be less stop and go traffic. Mayor Graves asked if historical data would be included in the calculations. Ms. Blanchard stated she doesn’t have an answer to that question, but she will look into it further. Councilmember Kragness thanked Ms. Blanchard for her presentation. She stated while she appreciates MnDOT’s verbal commitment to environmental justice, pointing out that the Federal government no longer requires or supports environmental justice efforts shows that MnDOT isn’t required to promote environmental justice. MnDOT has yet to provide any commitments in writing, specifically about air quality and health impacts. Ms. Blanchard stated MnDOT is in new territory, and they are determining how to navigate the new normal. Councilmember Kragness stated if environmental justice is a core value of MnDOT, then it should be in writing. Ms. Blanchard agreed it is very important. Mayor Graves asked for more information on the community wellness plans. Ms. Blanchard explained the journey to community wellness picks up on MnDOT’s previous health assessments. One MnDOT commitment is to engage with the public and other agencies to identify solutions to improve public health and equity. There is an agency advisory group that has met twice. There is also a community advisory group to seek out more alternative solutions. There is a public forum on June 4, 2025, to seek out more solutions from the public. MnDOT cannot fund all ideas because they have a finite budget. However, they hope to fund some ideas while empowering other groups to launch other initiatives. Mayor Graves asked how many Brooklyn Center residents are in the community advisory group. Ms. Blanchard stated she doesn’t have the information, but she will provide the details to the Council. The community advisory group includes clinics or other health sources. The public forum is intended to engage the general public. Mayor Graves stated she would like to see a list of the work group participants to see how well Brooklyn Center is represented. They know Brooklyn Center has been underrepresented historically. Page 19 of 96 5/27/25 -9- DRAFT Mayor Graves noted the topic has been somewhat contentious, but Ms. Blanchard has continued to be empathetic and understanding, which is much appreciated by Brooklyn Center. Councilmember Jerzak explained there has been a previous breach of trust, and it is hard to build that back. There is concern that MnDOT will use the repealed EO to benefit itself rather than the impacted communities. Councilmember Kragness moved and Mayor Graves seconded to accept the presentation from the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Motion passed unanimously. 7b. RESOLUTION NO. 2025-055 RECOGNIZING MAY 2025 AS ASIAN AMERICAN, NATIVE HAWAIIAN, AND PACIFIC ISLANDER (AANHPI) HERITAGE MONTH Mayor Graves read in full a Proclamation recognizing May 2025 as Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) Heritage Month. Councilmember Kragness moved and Councilmember Moore seconded to adopt a RESOLUTION Recognizing May 2025 as Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) Heritage Month. Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Graves called for a brief recess at 7:50 p.m. Mayor Graves recalled the meeting at 8:00 p.m. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 9a. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2025-003 SUBMITTED BY CHARLOTTE PRATT OF OH PRETTI! EVENTS & RENTALS LLC FOR ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A MULTI-PURPOSE EVENT SPACE AND COMMERCIAL KITCHEN (6820 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH) City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited City Planner Krystin Eldridge to continue the Staff presentation. Associate Planner Krystin Eldridge reviewed a request for a Conditional Use Permit. Ms. Eldridge stated Charlotte Pratt of Oh Pretti! Events and Rentals LLC is requesting review and consideration of a proposal to open an approximately 2,051-square-foot multi-purpose event space and dedicated Page 20 of 96 5/27/25 -10- DRAFT catering kitchen at 6820 Humboldt Avenue North in the Humboldt Shopping Center. Upon review of the proposal, it was determined that the Applicant will require approval of a conditional use permit, assuming a most similar use of “Banquet, Event, or Conference Facility.” Ms. Eldridge noted that the owner of the property, Thomas Kite, purchased the property in 2021. He owns approximately 4.1 acres, which makes up the entirety of the Humboldt Shopping Center. The property is zoned Neighborhood Mixed Use 2 (MX-N2). Ms. Eldridge showed images of the location of the property. She stated that it is located next to the House of Hui’s, and Scoreboard Pizza is nearby. Ms. Eldridge noted that the Applicant approached them in March of 2025 after their lease was executed for the property. She stated Oh Pretti! Events & Rentals LLC specializes in tailored event planning, luxury furniture rentals, and custom-designed decorative cakes. They cater for weddings, corporate events, and other celebrations, offering a suite of services and partnerships to have a full events planning experience. The Applicant has an established online presence through their social media page and business website, where services may be booked. Ms. Eldridge explained that the Applicant provided the City Staff with an interior floor plan, which identifies the approximately 2,051-square-foot space and is primarily proposed for a flexible, open space located at the front of the tenant space. The Applicant has been in discussion with City Staff regarding the installation of a second bathroom, a new catering kitchen, and a storage area. Ms. Eldridge noted that the space was previously set up as a small market, Value Foods, although they did offer some convenience services in their suite, the space needs to be reconfigured a bit to meet the Applicant’s needs. Ms. Eldridge explained that the Applicant has met with City Staff to discuss potential interior layout modifications to address any ingress, egress, and emergency routing needs, as well as placement for kitchen coolers, and a revised bathroom layout. Ms. Eldridge explained “multi-use” or “flex spaces” as an increasing use in the community. These spaces are typically much smaller. They shift between uses depending on who wants to use the space, such as a conference center, a wedding venue, or a birthday party. The space can host both informal and formal events. Ms. Eldridge stated that the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) does not address this type of use; however, given the flexibility in use, the times used, the presence of a catering kitchen, and a dedicated assembly/events space, they are requesting a Conditional Use Permit. Ms. Eldridge added that the case-by-case nature of the Conditional Use Permit allows Staff and Planning Commission to review the business operations, the targeted events, the location of the use, the adjacent permitted uses, noise considerations, traffic, and any adverse impacts to other properties. She noted that should any major concerns arise as part of the review process, the City may apply conditions as part of any approval. Page 21 of 96 5/27/25 -11- DRAFT Ms. Eldridge stated that the Applicant plans to install an in-house catering kitchen; however, outside food may be permitted with prior approval. An on-site manager will be present during business hours and available during events. The Applicant projects between eight and 12 events per month, which will last about four to six hours in length. The occupancy load for the space is 111 persons; however, the provided interior seating layout provides accommodation for up to 80 seats, the business narrative indicates the event space will more typically host between 50 to 75 guests, and the Applicant will provide seven staff or more if needed. Ms. Eldridge noted that the hours of operation for the Applicant would be Monday through Thursday, 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m., Saturday 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., and Sunday 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Ms. Eldridge added that if one were to calculate the parking, assuming this was a public place for assembly and eating and drinking, it would require 30 parking spaces, which is inclusive of four spaces needed for seven staff. The site has approximately 268 on-site parking spaces, which are not well-striped or maintained, so it is hard to calculate; however, if constructed today, they are overparked if used for a retail center calculation, which would need a maximum of 160 parking spaces for the entire shopping center. Ms. Eldridge stated that Conditional Use Permits, as outlined under Section 35-7700, are those uses that have been identified because of their nature, operation, locations, special requirements, or characteristics, that they have to be considered for the Planning Commission and City Council. Ms. Eldridge noted that the City Council may not grant the Conditional Use Permit unless particular criteria are met. She added that they work with the property owner to think about how the parking lot is being lit, to provide safety. The Applicant is putting up security cameras and offering security staff so that people can safely leave and come freely to the events. Knowing that there are many places around that are zoned residential, the Applicant wants to be a good neighbor to all. They do not believe there will be many traffic concerns. She added that there are two curb cuts on the property, so people can leave where necessary off those curb cuts. There is no worry about congestion due to the abundance of parking. Ms. Eldridge noted that for the anticipated permitting and conditions, the Applicant should adhere to the provisions and the outline conditional use permit section. The issuance of a conditional permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations. Any violations, therefore, may be grounds for revocation. The Applicant shall obtain any and all permit or licensing approvals from Hennepin County Health, the State of Minnesota, and the City. Ms. Eldridge added that any music or sound emissions shall be contained or confined to the tenant’s space and shall not project past property lines. The Applicant did offer to install sound barriers in the space, to keep the noise impacts down that may be typical of this sort of space. Exterior site lighting shall be maintained and kept in operating condition outside of the main west doors and the rear east doors at all times. She stated that the City Code does require that proper addressing be had, so the applicant must work with the property owner to install numerals. She Page 22 of 96 5/27/25 -12- DRAFT added that any outside trash disposal facilities shall be contained in the on-site dumpsters. The east drive aisle shall remain free and clear for emergency access. Also, all sign permitting should be followed as well. Ms. Eldridge added a public hearing was held at the Planning Commission meeting on May 8, 2025, where Applicant Charlotte Pratt described the proposed multi-use space as not only an event facility, but a location for social and community gatherings, and sees this type of use as a need in the community. Discussions with the Planning Commission surrounded how their use would be complementary to other tenants and uses in the neighborhood and any potential for conflicts (e.g. parking), noise, security, hours of operation, and event center operations. The Applicant provided the commissioners with examples of their work, which include small weddings, birthdays, and corporate events. Ms. Elrdidge noted that also at the meeting, the Applicant noted that anyone reserving their space could either enter into a contract for their catering services or elect to utilize an outside vendor. Similarly, the Applicant indicated no plans to obtain a liquor license. If someone would like liquor available during an event, they would need to contract separately with a licensed mobile bartending service and provide copies of any licensure, insurance coverage, etc. Ms. Eldridge pointed out that one of the commissioners noted that, while it was no fault of the Applicant, the Commissioner would like to see the owner of the Humboldt Shopping Center invest in their property by providing better lighting, improving the parking lot, which is degraded, and re-striping the parking lot. Ms. Eldridge stated following close of the public hearing, the Planning Commission elected to unanimously (5-0) recommend City Council approval of the requested issuance of a conditional use permit for an approximately 2,051-square-foot multi-use event space with a dedicated commercial kitchen, subject to the Applicant complying with the conditions as outlined in the Planning Commission Report dated May 8, 2025, and associated resolution. Councilmember Jerzak welcomed the business to Brooklyn Center and wished them luck. Councilmember Kragness pointed out the website looks great, as does the menu. Councilmember Moore noted her agreement with Councilmember Kragness. Councilmember Kragness moved and Councilmember __ seconded to adopt a RESOLUTION approving Planning Commission Application No. 2025-003 for issuance of a conditional use permit for the Subject Property located at 6820 Humboldt Ave North for an approximately 2,051- square-foot multi-purpose event space and commercial kitchen (Banquet, Conference, and Event Facility), based on the findings of fact and submitted application, and as amended by the conditions of approval in the resolution. Motion passed unanimously. Page 23 of 96 5/27/25 -13- DRAFT 9b. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2025-004 FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT FOR ADMIRAL LANE ADDITION AND DEDICATION OF CERTAIN RIGHT OF WAY (LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF ADMIRAL LANE AND BROOKLYN BOULEVARD) City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited Zoning and Planning Administrator Ginny to continue the Staff presentation. Zoning and Planning Administrator Ginny McIntosh reviewed a request for a preliminary and final plat, with nothing else attached to it. The City of Brooklyn Center is requesting approval of a preliminary and final plat for Admiral Lane Addition, which contemplates the creation of three out lots, the dedication of right-of-way, and certain drainage and utility easements. Ms. McIntosh showed images of the section on Admiral Lane and noted a nearby building, the Cross of Glory Church. Ms. McIntosh shared images of the preliminary plat that was prepared for the city by SRF, they were one of the consultants on the Brooklyn Boulevard project. She highlighted that there are three outlots: outlot A, just north of the Cross of Glory Church roof on the vacated portion of Admiral Lane, outlot B, and outlot C on the north side. These three outlots are being proposed because Public Works would like to ultimately see that the City no longer owns them, due to there not being much left of the outlots. Ms. McIntosh added that outlot C is in a little corner and that the resident’s driveway was moved off of Brooklyn Boulevard, and then a new curb was put in because they were trying to limit access to Brooklyn Boulevard. The resident’s driveway was shifted onto the newly realigned portion of Admiral Lane, leaving a tiny piece of grass on outlot C, which is unbuildable but needs to be mowed by the City. Ms. McIntosh explained that outlot B had a house on the property, which the Public Works Department worked with the owner to purchase the property, and it became a majority section of road with a little piece in the corner. The outlot B is a low-density residential lot but does not meet the minimum to be a legal lot. The outlot is being mowed and maintained, but it is unclear what is being done with it. Ms. McIntosh stated that outlot A is the largest portion of the three lots, however, this is the vacated portion of Admiral Lane, but the underground infrastructure was kept here. She added that this presents an issue because nothing can be constructed on top of the underground utilities, but it is unclear what is being done with it. Ms. McIntosh shared an image of the final plat. She described that the image is line work, and ultimately, what is recorded at the County and updated for parcel maps. She stated that the key goal with outlot A is to dedicate easements because the City needs to maintain access to those underground utilities to repair, maintain, and eventually replace them. Page 24 of 96 5/27/25 -14- DRAFT Ms. McIntosh stated that outlots B and C are unbuildable. She added that the realignment of Admiral was determined as part of the modernization efforts of Brooklyn Boulevard development over the past 50 years or so, which created a corridor that did not function as well as it should. So there was a lot of focus on trail and sidewalk connections for pedestrians and bicyclists, as can be seen now with the new sidewalk and multi-use trail along Brooklyn Boulevard, and then transit facilities. Ms. McIntosh added that in 2013, the City of Brooklyn Center, in cooperation with Hennepin County, Three Rivers Park District, Minnesota Department of Transportation, and Metro Transit, performed a corridor study along Brooklyn Boulevard from Interstate 94 to 49th Avenue. She stated that the project goals were aimed at enhancing traffic operations and improving roadway safety. She added that the key thing for the Brooklyn Boulevard project was getting curb cuts off of Brooklyn Boulevard, as it is a County road. There are still many single-family neighbors that are attempting to back out onto Brooklyn Boulevard, which may have as many as 20,000 to 30,000 cars per day. The City was trying to eliminate as many curb cuts as possible, leaving one property that had to shift its curb cut to Admiral. Then some curb cuts were consolidated as much as possible. She noted that one of the key things was for Admiral Lane to align with 60th Avenue North. Ms. McIntosh stated that there have been some discussions with property owners who are adjacent to each of these outlots to gauge their interest in potentially acquiring these parcels. She reiterated that the focus should be on creating outlots, dedicating right-of-way, and dedicated easements. She added that there have been no final determinations at this time for selling off the outlots and that would require a separate action by either the City or the EDA. Ms. McIntosh pointed out that the City of Brooklyn Center Public Works Department mows both 6000 Ewing Avenue North and 6001 Brooklyn Boulevard. The total weekly effort moving the properties during the summer months requires six to eight hours of Staff time each summer to maintain what are effectively unbuildable parcels. A transfer in ownership would eliminate this ongoing task and improve operational efficiency. Ms. McIntosh noted that in the case of 6001 Brooklyn Boulevard, which is adjacent to Cross of Glory Lutheran Church, this portion of land contains the former alignment of Admiral Lane as well as underground City infrastructure. The City intends to retain access to these areas to ensure continued access for inspection, maintenance, and future repairs. Ms. McIntosh stated that the City did work with SRF Consulting Group, Inc. back and forth, so the plat that was shown was revised multiple times to add in information that was needed for the preliminary plat. The plat identifies proposed five-foot easements for adjoining lot lines and ten- foot easements along public ways unless otherwise indicated. Ms. McIntosh added that a public hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on April 24, 2025, for the preliminary and final plat. Mail notifications were mailed to all taxpayers and physical properties within 350 feet of the Subject Property, and the notice was posted to the City of Brooklyn Center’s website and subscribers of the City’s weekly events bulletin. Page 25 of 96 5/27/25 -15- DRAFT Ms. McIntosh stated that on May 8, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the request for plat approval of ADMIRAL LANE ADDITION. One resident called in and requested clarification on the Planning Commission request to re-plat the Subject Property and expressed some frustration that the re-aligned Admiral Lane did not appear to address safety concerns such as speeding. City Staff indicated they could bring up these concerns with Public Works for discussion. Ms. McIntosh noted another resident, who is adjacent to proposed Outlot C, attended the meeting to learn more about the City’s plans for the excess lands and was worried his new driveway curb cut, which was relocated from Brooklyn Boulevard to Admiral Lane, would be sold off, and he would no longer have access to his property. City Staff let the resident know they would follow up with him, but that it was not the City’s intent to remove access to his property. The resident asked if the City could look into providing public hearing notices in alternative languages, such as Spanish. Ms. McIntosh added another resident made reference to the neighboring Cross of Glory Lutheran Church and if there were options for proposed Outlot A to have a cultural or public art installation. Ms. McIntosh stated City staff received communication from two other residents regarding the public hearing notice; however, their inquiries were not directed necessarily at the subdivision of land and dedication of right-of-way, but rather at the potential for redevelopment. Ms. McIntosh explained following close of the public hearing, the Planning Commission elected to unanimously (5-0) recommend City Council approval of the requested preliminary and final plats for ADMIRAL LANE ADDITION and dedication of certain right-of-way (ROW) for the Subject Property located in the vicinity of Admiral Lane and Brooklyn Boulevard, subject to the Applicant complying with the conditions as outlined in the Planning Commission report dated May 8, 2025, and associated resolution. Mayor Graves noted she also considered alternative uses such as a pollinator garden which would require less maintenance for mowing. Ms. McIntosh stated church leadership has had initial discussions about acquiring the largest parcel which is next to the Cross of Glory Church. Another outlot is mainly a driveway and doesn’t have enough land for another use. Councilmember Jerzak pointed out that a garden next to the church would require water access, which could only come from the church. Overall, he is supportive of selling the lots to the adjacent properties. Councilmember Jerzak moved and Mayor Graves seconded to adopt a RESOLUTION approving Planning Commission Application No. 2025-004 for preliminary and final plat approval of Admiral Lane Addition and dedication of certain right-of-way, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, and as amended by the conditions of approval in the resolution. Page 26 of 96 5/27/25 -16- DRAFT Motion passed unanimously. 10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS 11. COUNCIL REPORT Mayor Graves reported on her attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: •Attended a meeting about Kenyan Independence Day. •Attended the Northwest Cable Commission quarterly meeting. •Attended the 252 PAC meeting. •Attended the National League of Cities Federal Advocacy meeting. •Attended the Northwest Tourism Executive Committee meeting. •Participated in a biweekly meeting with Dr. Edwards. •Met with Brooklyn Bridge Alliance about youth on boards. •Attended the Northwest Tourism Happy Hour. •Attended the Park Center Orchestra Concert. •Attended the Osseo American Indian Ceremony for graduating seniors. •Spoke at the Rise and Remember event at George Floyd Square •Noted she will be doing the welcome for Ilhan Omar’s event the following day, attending the community meeting, and possibly attending a choir concert. 12. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Kragness moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 8:21 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Page 27 of 96 5/27/25 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WORK SESSION MAY 27, 2025 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council/Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Work Session called to order by Mayor/President April Graves at 8:27 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor/President April Graves and Councilmembers/Commissioners Dan Jerzak, Teneshia Kragness, and Laurie Ann Moore. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards, Finance Director Angela Holm, Liquor Operations Manager Greg “Woody” Keehr, City Attorney Siobhan Tolar, and Interim City Clerk Shannon Pettit. Councilmember/Commissioner Kris Lawrence-Anderson was excused. ACTIVE DISCUSSION ITEMS LIQUOR STORE OPERATIONS, STORE #2 City Manager Reggie Edwards introduced the item and invited Finance Director Angela Holm and Liquor Operations Manager Greg “Woody” Keehr to continue the Staff presentation. Finance Director Angela Holm explained the purpose of the presentation is to provide additional information to the Council/EDA about liquor operations. The desired outcome is to obtain guidance from the Council/EDA on continued liquor operations. Ms. Holm pointed out that shifts in social and economic conditions during 2020 and 2021 impacted the stores’ long-standing customer base. Construction of the new store in Shingle Creek Crossing in 2019 led to higher expenses at a time when profit margins were lower than expected due to depreciation and bond payments. Liquor Operations Manager Greg “Woody” Keehr showed a graph with historical sales data operation including the sales, cost of goods, and gross profit. In 2017, the sales were around $6.4 million. Sales decreased in 2020 due to COVID-19 and civil unrest but increased again in 2022. They refocused their marketing and discount programming to increase profits. Page 28 of 96 5/27/25 -2- DRAFT Mr. Keehr showed the historical sales data for Store #1. He pointed out that Walmart left Brooklyn Center in 2023, which impacted their sales. The annual sales are just under $2.5 million. The profit margins are improving due to improved purchasing strategies. He also showed the sales data for Store #2. There has been good growth from $1.7 million in 2017 to just under $2.5 million in 2024. They have been able to get better pricing due to chain purchasing with the two stores. Mr. Keehr showed a map of Store #2 and its competition. There are more than ten liquor stores within driving distance of Brooklyn Center. Liquor purchasing follows the gravity flow model, which means people will shop in the most convenient location to their current position. Store #1 would retain a small percentage of customers currently shopping at Store #2 if it were to close. Mr. Keehr explained that Liquor Stores started with six full-time roles in 2017. In 2023 and 2024, there were up to eight full-time employees. In 2025, there are six full-time roles. He pointed out he took on the operations role and eliminated that position. They are currently down an assistant manager. Mr. Keehr showed a graph depicting staffing cost reduction since 2020 for each of the stores. When the extra full-time positions were hired, it doesn’t appear the part-time folks had decreased hours. Once he started working with the City, he was able to decrease part-time hours and decrease staffing costs. Plus, the full-time employees offer more consistency and are more committed to the purpose of the stores. Mr. Keehr explained that the management and full-time roles have had expectations set to allow more experience on the floor. The reduction in overall part-time hours has resulted in cost savings of over $32,000. They have reduced the hours at Store #2 because they were losing money during the first two hours during weekdays. The goal for staffing is to use full-time employees for a majority of hourly coverage and then use part-time staff to cover the gaps. Mr. Keehr noted they are prioritizing focused purchasing and focused pricing. They offer purchase deals on the top 30 or more selling products. There is increased profit through lower costs. There is cyclical sale pricing on products to maximize sales and the competitive pricing on products increases the repeat customer base. Chain buying for two locations allows them to save money between the stores. Mr. Keehr added as for focused pricing, he hopes to maximize profit through a set pricing structure. The consistent evaluation of pricing will maintain the gross profit margin. They will also create store sale pricing to be competitive with both local stores and larger chains. They will advertise in windows and on displays to show savings. Mayor/President Graves asked if there is a benefit to the member program. Mr. Keehr explained the member program is a drain on the computers and requires internet access. Plus, the stores were sitting on liability while waiting to see if customers would spend their points. As an alternative, they have Mellow Mondays which offers ten percent off THC products on Mondays, and Wine Wednesdays. Tuesday is Senior Day. It is attractive for customers to get immediate savings rather than earning points for future savings. Page 29 of 96 5/27/25 -3- DRAFT Mr. Keehr showed examples of products that have been subject to focused purchasing markdowns. For Cuervo Tequila Liters, one case costs $221.90 at $18.50 per bottle. With a 28 percent margin, they can sell it for $25.99. That price is extremely inflated for the area. Purchasing through a small deal costs $187.24 at $15.61 per bottle. With a 28 percent margin, they can sell it for $21.99. When they utilize a chain deal cost, costs $162.00 at $13.50 per bottle. With a 32 percent margin, they can sell it for $19.99. The profit is higher for them and the cost is lower than competitors. Staff is trained to explain a liter of tequila is a better deal than the smaller bottle. They implement a similar strategy for E&J Brandy 1.75 and Remy Martin VSOP 750, which is a high-quality item. Mr. Keehr reiterated the proposed pathway to profitability is to maximize profit through a set pricing structure, create in-store sale pricing, and daily category sales. He showed three tables with profit margin percentages for liquor, wine, and beer based on product size. Mr. Keehr explained another way to increase profitability is to create a monthly recap of sales. He prepares a detailed report to both the City Manager and Finance Director. He showed an example of the table he prepares each month. Ms. Holm pointed out that the total net change for future years is shown to be positive. Staffing adjustments were added to the previous estimates. The full-time employees are committed to the cause and are prepared to do the work. Councilmember/Commissioner Kragness thanked Staff for the presentation and noted the numbers look better. She suggested Thirsty Thursdays be another special day. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak asked if a lease has been negotiated and if the necessary building improvements are included. He added the presentation didn’t include any information on shrinkage. Ultimately, he wouldn’t invest in the business from the perspective of an investor. Ms. Holm explained they are in the middle of lease negotiations. The terms are seemingly favorable. They have been waiting to receive guidance from the Council/EDA regarding the future of the stores before finalizing a lease. The landlord wants a ten-year lease. The City Attorney is assisting Staff in the negotiations. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak pointed out cannabis will be another competition source. Also, the lease is likely to require fixing up. Mr. Keehr stated the lease may require new HVAC units, updated flooring, and painting. They already have new signage coming in. The counter was recently re-wrapped as well. There are five HVAC units to consider, and the City will continue maintenance of the units should the lease continue. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak noted Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson has previously indicated her preference to close Liquor Store #2, and he agrees. Mr. Keehr reiterated that he would have less buying power if he couldn’t do chain purchasing. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak stated closing the store would save them money. Mr. Keehr stated closing one store impacts the profitability of the other store. With the current numbers, Page 30 of 96 5/27/25 -4- DRAFT turning a profit is more likely with two stores. He has previously worked with Richfield and Edina municipal stores, and they each had a location that didn’t make a profit. However, they kept the stores because of the purchasing power and convenience for customers. Also, closing the store will cause people to lose their jobs. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak acknowledged Mr. Keehr’s passion and support of his employees, but the Council must also think about the taxpayers. Dr. Edwards pointed out the taxpayers have not paid anything to the liquor stores. Instead, there is a spenddown from the reserves. The projections show that both stores will make money in 2026 which would generate money for the enterprise. Councilmember/Commissioner Moore stated she is not in favor of a ten-year lease. If Brooklyn Center opened up the opportunity for small businesses to sell liquor, then they would be supporting entrepreneurs. Robbinsdale had municipal liquor stores for several years and had to close. Other types of businesses need to be less restrictive in Brooklyn Center. She thanked Staff for the presentation and the more favorable numbers. She noted her appreciation of their effort and concern for current employees. Mayor/President Graves noted the initial opening of the stores was contentious. One location was supposed to host another small business as well. Even despite COVID-19 and civil unrest complications, one store is continuing to turn a profit. Ultimately, she supports Staff’s recommendations and trusts in their professional experience. Dr. Edwards added the lease has to return to the Council for review. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak noted the lease expires on June 30, 2025, so it needs to be addressed quickly. Ms. Holm explained leasing is the best option for Brooklyn Center. They have been aggressively negotiating with the landlord in recent weeks. Councilmember/Commissioner Kragness asked what the term of the current lease is. Ms. Holm stated the term was for one year because they were considering the purchase of a building. The rent would have gone up significantly if it were to extend past one year. The landlord approached the City early in 2025 and said he wouldn’t increase the rent if Brooklyn Center entered into a long-term agreement with them. The landlord has been responsive and is aware that the City is a good tenant. Mr. Keehr explained the pros and cons of entering into a 10-year lease. Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak asked what had changed since the last presentation, because they previously said Store #1 would be instantly profitable should the other store close. Ms. Holm stated nothing has changed with Store #1. It has been consistently profitable and has to make enough to cover the other location. The adjustments in staffing change the numbers to allow both locations to be profitable. Page 31 of 96 5/27/25 -5- DRAFT Councilmember/Commissioner Jerzak asked what caused Staff to seek out input from the Council. Ms. Holm stated the auditor looks at the fund in totality. ADJOURNMENT Mayor/President Graves moved and Councilmember/Commissioner Kragness seconded adjournment of the City Council/Economic Development Authority Work Session at 9:05 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Page 32 of 96 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 6/9/2025 TO: City Council FROM: THROUGH: BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Approval of Licenses Requested Council Action: The following businesses/persons have applied for City licenses as noted. Each business/person has fulfilled the requirements of the City Ordinance governing respective licenses, submitted appropriate applications, and paid proper fees. Applicants for rental dwelling licenses are in compliance with Chapter 12 of the City Code of Ordinances unless comments are noted below the property address on the attached rental report. Mechanical Home Care Heating and Air LLC 14450 Ewing Ave S, Burnsville 55306 Midwest Maintenance & Mech 750 Pennsylvania Ave S., Golden Valley 55426 MH Plumbing Inc. 6725 277th Ave NW, Isanti 55040 MJW HVAC, Inc. 13600 Edgewood Street, Becker 55308 Sign Hanger’s Signapolis, Inc. 7435 Washington Ave S, Minneapolis 55439 Fireworks-Temporary TNT Fireworks 3245 Co Rd 10 N Brooklyn Center MN, 55430 Garbage Hauler Allied Waste 8661 Rendova St NE Circles Pines, MN 55014 Curbside Waste 18150 118th Ave N Dayton, Mn 55369 Walters Recycling & Refuse Page 33 of 96 2830 101st Ave NE Blaine, MN 55449 Waste Management 10050 Naples St NE Blaine, MN 55449 Background: Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. For Council Approval 6.9.25 FOR COUNCIL 5.13 to 5.27 Page 34 of 96 Location Address License Subtype Renewal/Initial Owner Property Code Violations License Type Police CFS* Final License Type** Previous License Type*** Consecutive Type IV's 5316 Colfax Ave N Single Initial CAG MINNESOTA FUND II LLC 19 Type IV N/A Type IV N/A N/A 4809 Twin Lake Ave N Multiple Family 2 Bldgs 6 Units Renewal Twin Lake Apartments 7 = 1.16 per unit Type II 0 Type II Type II N/A 4708 Twin Lake Ave N Two Family Renewal Michael N Mohs Met Requirements 3 Type II 0 Type II Type III N/A 5925 Washburn Ave N Single Renewal Endura 5925 Llc 3 Type II 0 Type II Type I N/A 6242 Scott Ave N Single Renewal Cosco Property I Llc 10 Type IV 0 Type IV Type II 0 7025 Grimes Ave N Single Renewal SFR ACQUISITIONS 3 LLC 6 Type III 0 Type III Type IV 2 7141 Newton Ave N Single Renewal Ih2 Property Illinois Lp 17 Type IV 0 Type IV Type IV 5 *CFS = Calls for service for renewal licenses only (Initial licenses are not applicable to CFS and will be listed as N/A) **License type being issued ***Initial licenses will not show a Type I = 3 year, Type II = 2 year, Type III = 1 year, Type IV = 6 months All properties are current on City utilities and taxes Rental Licenses for Council Approval 6.9.25 Page 35 of 96 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 6/9/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Letter of Engagement with Carson, Clelland & Schreder Law Firm for Legal Services Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve a Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Letter of Engagement with a Law Firm for Legal Services Background: Staff is seeking an one-year extension of a Letter of Engagement with the Law Firm of Carson, Clelland & Schreder for representation of the City of Booklyn Center for municipal prosecution services in 2025 and 2026, with the intent of seeking bids for services in 2027. Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution_Awarding_Legal_Services_Engagement_Letter 2. Brooklyn Center Contract for Legal Services 9.13.10 Page 36 of 96 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LETTER OF ENGAGEMENT WITH CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER LAW FIRM FOR LEGAL SERVICES WHEREAS, the City Council Code of Policies Section 2.81 requires that the City solicit proposals for legal services every four (4) years and; WHEREAS, proposals were solicited in February of 2005 through a Request for Proposals for Legal Services; and WHEREAS, the Mayor, Council Members, City Manager, following the Code of Policies Section 2.81 has reviewed the proposals and recommended awarding of the engagement for legal services to Carson, Clelland & Schreder for prosecution services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the firm of Carson, Clelland & Schreder Law Firm is awarded an engagement letter for performing the legal services and that the City Manager is hereby authorized and requested to negotiate a Letter of Engagement for those legal services to be reviewed and considered for approval by the City Council. June 9, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 37 of 96 Page 38 of 96 Page 39 of 96 Page 40 of 96 Page 41 of 96 Page 42 of 96 Page 43 of 96 Page 44 of 96 Page 45 of 96 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 6/9/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Contract Extension with Kennedy & Graven, Chartered Law Firm for Legal Services Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve a Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Contract Extension with Kennedy & Graven, Chartered Law Firm for Legal Services Background: Staff is seeking approval of an one-year extension of the contract with Kennedy & Graven, Chartered Law Firm, for representation of the City of Brooklyn Center for services in 2025 and 2026, with the intent of seeking bids for services in 2027. Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution for Legal Services Kennedy and Graven 2. DOCSOPEN-#1031473-v2-Amendment_to_Legal_Services_Agreement Page 46 of 96 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT EXTENSION WITH KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED LAW FIRM FOR LEGAL SERVICES WHEREAS, the City Council Code of Policies Section 2.81 requires that the City solicit proposals for legal services every four (4) years and; WHEREAS, proposals were solicited in November 2022 through a Request for Proposals for Legal Services; and WHEREAS, the Mayor, two (2) Council members, City Manager, Communications and Community Engagement Manager and Interim Assistant City Manager, and Manager of the Office of Community Prevention, Health and Safety appointed by the City Council following the Code of Policies Section 2.81 has reviewed the proposals and recommended awarding of the engagement for legal services to Kennedy Graven. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the firm of Kennedy Graven is awarded an engagement letter for performing the legal services and that the City Manager is hereby authorized and requested to negotiate a Letter of Engagement for those legal services to be reviewed and considered for approval by the City Council. June 9, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 47 of 96 BR291-4-1031473.v2 AGREEMENT FOR CIVIL LEGAL SERVICES This Amendment to the Agreement for Civil Legal Services (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between the CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (“City”) and the law firm of KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED (“Law Firm”) effective as of January 1, 2025. In consideration of the mutual promises and conditions contained in this Agreement, the City and the Law Firm agree as follows: 1.Appointment. The City appoints the firm of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered to the position of City Attorney, with Siobhan L. Tolar acting as primary legal counsel for the City. The Law Firm shall also serve as the attorney for the City’s Economic Development Authority. 2.Term and Termination. This Agreement shall be effective as of January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2026, and shall continue thereafter until renewed or a different firm is selected to serve as City Attorney. During the term of this Agreement, either party may terminate this Agreement upon 60 days’ written notice to the other party. 3.Legal Services. The Law Firm agrees to perform all usual and customary civil legal services for the City in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The parties understand the Law Firm takes a team approach to providing legal services. As such, while Siobhan L. Tolar will be primarily responsible for providing legal services, others in the Law Firm will also directly and indirectly provide legal services to the City. 4.Compensation. The City agrees to pay the Law Firm for its legal services in accordance with the following: (a) Meeting Retainer. A meeting retainer fee for attendance at the City’s two (2) regular City Council meetings per month paid monthly as follows: Year Monthly Payment 2025 $1,100 2026 $1,200 (b) Legal Services. The Law Firm will charge a per hour rate for general counsel legal services as follows: Type of Service 2025 Hourly Rate 2026 Hourly Rate General Counsel Services (not otherwise specified) $180 $200 Other Non-Routine Services (civil litigation not related to ordinance and zoning enforcement, cable and telecommunications and labor/employment) $186 $206 Page 48 of 96 BR291-4-1031473.v2 2 Pass Through Fees (paid as part of public improvement or by third party) $250 $320 Bond counsel (as needed) Customary rates Customary rates Support Staff 2025 Hourly Rate 2026 Hourly Rate Paralegals $134 $144 Law Clerks $132 $142 (c) Expenses. The City will reimburse the Law Firm for actual, necessary, and reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the Law Firm in the performance of legal services under this Agreement. These costs and expenses include, but are not limited to, courier and delivery charges, process server fees, court filing fees, mileage and parking fees related to providing legal services, postage, printing and photocopying costs for large projects, document recording fees, and other actual costs of a similar nature. These fees and expenses will be specified on the Law Firm’s monthly billing statement sent to the City. 5.Billing. (a) Billing Statements. The Law Firm will submit to the City a monthly billing statement for legal services and expenses. The statement will itemize the date of services, identify the attorney, paralegal, and/or support personnel providing the services, list the time spent, provide a detailed description of the services performed, and state the fee for those services. The statements will organize billing based on activity and contact and will summary monthly (and annually) the cost by type of activity. Time shall be billed in tenths of an hour. (b) Billing Cycle. The Law Firm will bill monthly for legal services. Generally, bills will go out approximately 20-30 days after the end of the prior month, and Law Firm personnel will work with the City to timely place bills on the next City Council agenda. (c) Payment Expectations. The City will pay the bill of the Law Firm routinely according to its internal payment procedures by forwarding a check to the Law Firm paying for both legal services and expenses shown on the billing statements. (d) Disputes. In the event that the City disputes any aspect of the Law Firm’s invoice, the appropriate City representative will contact Siobhan L. Tolar at the Law Firm stating the nature of the dispute. The parties agree to work in good faith to resolve any such disputes. 6.Insurance. The Law Firm shall maintain professional liability (malpractice) insurance at a minimum coverage level of $1,000,000 per claim, and $3,000,000 annual aggregate. The Law Firm shall provide a current Certificate of Insurance to the City upon request. Page 49 of 96 BR291-4-1031473.v2 3 7.Attorney/Client Privilege. The Law Firm is authorized to utilize e-mail without encryption to transmit and receive confidential client information. The City specifically acknowledges that it understands the confidentiality risks associated with inadvertent interception of such information. 8.Assignment. The Law Firm will not assign any part of this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the City. 9.Conflict of Interest. The Law Firm will notify the City as soon as practicable if the Law Firm represents an opposing party to the City in a legal matter. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be duly executed by their proper officers and representatives as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER By ______________________ Its Mayor By Dr. Reginald Edwards Its City Manager Date:______________________________ KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED By Siobhan L. Tolar City Attorney Date:______________________________ Page 50 of 96 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 6/9/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Jesse Anderson, Community Development Director THROUGH: BY: Kat Ellgren, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Canceling and Re-Assessing Special Assessments for 6030 Vincent Ave N to Hennepin County Tax Rolls (BC Little League Fields) Requested Council Action: -Motion to Approve A Resolution Canceling Certified Special Assessments and Re- assessing Special Assessments for 6030 Vincent Ave N to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls Background: The Community Development Department has had recent discussions with the Brooklyn Center Little League regarding their upcoming tax forfeiture due to special assessments. This tax forfeiture situation is somewhat unique because the property is tax-exempt as a non-profit, meaning the forfeiture is based solely on City Assessments. The Little League has asked to have their past-due special assessments pulled back and reassessed as a five-year assessment. After discussions with Hennepin County, this can be done via a City Council resolution. Staff have prepared a resolution that would allow the Council to decide whether to cancel and reassess the delinquent utility and grass-mowing fees. Past Due Taxes: 2021 - $3,945.54 Assessed for Delinquent Utilities 2023 - $4,347.47 Assessed for Delinquent Utilities 2024 - $1,681.80 Assessed for Delinquent Utilities 2025 - $1,920.14 Assessed for Mowing and $1,622.77 for Delinquent Utilities Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: Page 51 of 96 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Floodplain Map 2. Resolution 3. Email Request Page 52 of 96 Hennepin County Natural Resources Map Date: 6/4/2025 Comments: This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is not suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2025 Legend PID: 0211821220004 Address: 6030 Vincent Ave N, Brooklyn Center 55430 Owner: Brooklyn Ctr Amer Little Lea Acres: 4.72 ¯1:1,200 Page 53 of 96 Hennepin County Natural Resources Map Date: 6/4/2025 Comments: This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is not suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2025 Legend PID: 0211821220004 Address: 6030 Vincent Ave N, Brooklyn Center 55430 Owner: Brooklyn Ctr Amer Little Lea Acres: 4.72 ¯1:1,200 Page 54 of 96 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CANCELLING CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND RE-ASSESSING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR 6030 VINCENT AVE N TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has caused Noxious weeds and tall grass abatement costs for certain properties within the City from September 16, 2022 thru September 16, 2023 under the authority of City Ordinance Section 18- 204 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 429; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues 444.075 and City Ordinances, Section 4- 105 and 4-201 authorize certification of such delinquent accounts to the County property tax rolls for collections; and WHEREAS, City Council had held previous public hearing for unpaid assessments for 6030 Vincent Ave N, approved the special assessment; and WHEREAS, there have been previous assessments for 6030 Vincent Ave N including, $3,945.54 in 2020 for delinquent utilities, $4,347.47 in 2022 for delinquent utilities, $1681.80 in 2023 for delinquent utilities, $1,920.14 in 2024 for delinquent grass mowing charges, and $1622.77 in 2024 for delinquent utilities; and WHEREAS, the special assessments the property at 6030 Vincent Ave N remined unpaid; and WHERASE, the city council recognizes the challenges that the property owners have faced regarding the property, and WHERASE, the City Council will cancel the unpaid assessments and reassess the unpaid amounts to be paid over 5 years with interest. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1.The previously assessed amount of $13,517.72 is cancelled. 2.The past due assessments costs of $13,517.72 incurred from 2020 through 2025 is hereby adopted and certified as Levy No. 26047. 3.The special assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable in equal annual installments with interest thereon at 7 percent per Page 55 of 96 RESOLUTION NO. _____________ 4.annum, extending over a period of five years. The first of the installments shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 2026, and shall bear interest on the entire assessment from December 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 5.The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the certification of the assessment to the County Auditor make a whole or partial payment to the City Treasurer. After November 27, 2025, he or she may pay the total special assessment, plus interest. Interest will accumulate from December 1, 2025 through the date of payment. Such payment must be made by the close of business November 27, 2025 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 6.The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplication of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. June 9, 2025 ________________________________ Date Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________________ City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 56 of 96 From:BCLL Baseball To:Jesse Anderson Subject:BCLL taxes Date:Tuesday, May 20, 2025 5:16:10 AM Good Morning, I would like to have this e-mail serve as a request to push the special assessment taxes onto a payment plan for the next 5 years. My name is Jennifer Brenny, my husband's family has lived here since 1984 and my family moved here in the early 1990's. Most have moved away, but my mother in law still owns a home in Brooklyn Center. I own a home just inside Minneapolis on 49th ave, still within Brooklyn Center Little League Booundaries. I was a Safety Officer for the BCLL Board amongst other positions for the last 10 years. My husband was a Coach, Concession manager, maintenance volunteer, and the one that took great care of the fields, even weedwacking. The former board president, Tracy Shocinski and Secretary Jamie Rykyto along with Nancy Mikulak were the last board members to run BCLL. Nancy Mikulak is still interested in helping out. She had some bad health problems that limited what she was able to do. Now cancer free, she is willing to help as much as possible to get the league back on track. We have a few other volunteers coming forward to possibly help form a Youth Baseball Organization for Brooklyn Center. At this time, I'm unsure if BCLL specifically can be continued. We face challenges when we are a Little League that our community can't cover. Being a Little League means All volunteer work. Very few people can actually get paid and if they are paid then the funds have to be found by BCLL. Little league international does not help with any funding, but may point us towards grants we can apply for (many are matching grants) if we are in good standing, which we are not. The previous board walked away because members of the community l, including player parents, do not show interest in volunteering for BCLL. Other challenges are hypodermic needles left in the dugouts, parties at the fields after hours with lots of trash left behind, break in after break in after break in of the sheds and score sheds. The equipment is either damaged or stolen. Leaving us with nothing to mow with. Then there was the break in and fire set to the bathrooms which ran a Huge water bill. It just seems the problems are compiled. It's discouraging because we know that police eat lunch in our parking lot, or go for walks around the trails still parking out parking lot. But the crime, homelessness and disparity continue. The homeless leave their clothes and trash in the dugouts along with drug paraphernalia and human feces. The community even walks their dogs at the field leaving behind the dog feces. We just cant keep up. I hope to save the fields from auction. This would give BCLL a little breather to see if we can change the fields and bring in income. I have a few leads on baseball programs that need practice fields, but we need to clean up and get things playable again. The best way I am seeing is if we are actually able to pay some workers. As the plan gets worked out I'm hoping the City of BC can show us some grace and mercy. Thank you for listening and I hope change is near. Sincerely, Jennifer Brenny Page 57 of 96 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 6/9/2025 TO: City Council FROM: THROUGH: BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Proclamation - June 19th, Juneteenth Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve a Proclamation Recognizing and Celebrating Juneteenth Background: This proclamations recognizes and celebrates June 19th as Juneteenth, Freedom Day. Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Juneteenth Proclamation25 Page 58 of 96 PROCLAMATION The City of Brooklyn Center Celebrates and Recognizes Juneteenth City of Brooklyn Center Proclamation in Honor of Juneteenth Freedom Day WHEREAS, Juneteenth, also known as “Freedom Day,” commemorates June 19, 1865, when Union soldiers arrived in Galveston, Texas, to inform the last remaining enslaved African Americans of their freedom—more than two years after the Emancipation Proclamation took effect; and WHEREAS, more than 41.1 million people of African and African American descent live in the United States, according to the 2020 U.S. Census Bureau, and WHEREAS, 33.9% of Brooklyn Center residents identify as African or African American, contributing significantly to the city’s cultural, civic, and economic vitality and WHEREAS, beginning in 1619, the first enslaved Africans were brought to colonial Virginia, and millions were forced into slavery. WHEREAS, Juneteenth serves as both a celebration of Black freedom and a day of reflection, education, and commitment to equity, justice, and WHEREAS, in 2021, President Joe Biden signed legislation officially declaring Juneteenth a federal holiday after years of advocacy from Black communities and leaders across the country and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center honors Juneteenth as a critical marker in American history and a time to uplift the voices, stories, and ongoing contributions of African and African American residents and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park will host its annual Juneteenth Celebration on Saturday, June 21, 2025, at North Hennepin Community College to commemorate this day with community, culture, and reflection; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mayor Graves, Mayor of the City of Brooklyn Center, on behalf of the City Council, staff, and residents, do hereby proclaim Thursday, June 19, 2025, as: Juneteenth Freedom Day in the City of Brooklyn Park We call upon all residents to join in celebrating, educating, and recognizing the continued resilience, contributions, and history of African and African American communities in Brooklyn Center. ___June 9th, 2025_ __________________ Date Mayor ATTEST: __________________ City Clerk 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy Brooklyn Center, MN 55433 Page 59 of 96 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 6/9/2025 TO: City Council FROM: THROUGH: BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Proclamation in Celebration of Colors of Southeast Asia (COSA) Fest Requested Council Action: - Motion to accept the proclamation Background: This proclamation celebrates and recognizes the Colors of Southeast Asia (Cosa) Fest on June 27th Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proclamation in Celebration of Colors of Southeast Asia 2025 Page 60 of 96 Proclamation IN CELEBRATION OF COLORS OF SOUTHEAST ASIA (COSA) FEST WHEREAS, the vibrant and diverse community of Brooklyn Center comes together to embrace and celebrate the rich cultural tapestries of Southeast Asia, acknowledging Fifty Years of the immense contributions by our Southeast Asian residents to the cultural, social, and economic vibrancy of our city; and WHEREAS, the Colors of Southeast Asia Fest stands as a beacon of unity, fostering mutual understanding and respect among all by highlighting the unique traditions, music, dance, art, and cuisine of Southeast Asian communities such as the Khmer, Lao, Vietnamese, Thai, Hmong, Tai Dam, Khmu, Mien, Lu, and many others; and WHEREAS, the festival provides an opportunity for celebration and education, offering colorful parades, engaging workshops, art exhibits, cultural performances, and culinary delights that captivate the senses and enrich the soul, thereby promoting cross-cultural friendships and global awareness; and WHEREAS, this gathering encourages both residents and visitors to partake in this joyful celebration of diversity, encouraging an inclusive environment where all voices and stories are honored and shared, strengthening the communal bonds within Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, the Colors of Southeast Asia Fest is organized with dedication and passion by volunteers, community leaders, and organizers whose hard work and commitment bring this spectacular event to life for the enjoyment and enrichment of all attendees; and WHEREAS, the city of Brooklyn Center acknowledges the importance of cultural heritage and global unity, embracing the shared values of peace, prosperity, and mutual respect, and expressing our pride in being a city that honors the cultural riches and traditions of its vibrant communities; WHEREAS, COSA Fest will be celebrated in the City of Brooklyn Center at Centennial Park on Saturday, June 7th, 2025, from 12pm-4pm; and NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mayor Graves, Mayor of Brooklyn Center, do hereby proclaim June 7th as **Colors of Southeast Asia (COSA) Fest Day** in Brooklyn Center, inviting all residents to join in this festive occasion, celebrate our shared humanity, and embrace the vivid colors of our city's diverse community and heritage. ___June 9th, 2025_ __________________ Date Mayor ATTEST: __________________ City Clerk 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy Brooklyn Center, MN 55433 Page 61 of 96 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 6/9/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Kat Ellgren, Administrative Assistant THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Proclamation recognizing June 2025 as LGBTQIA+ Pride Month in the City of Brooklyn Center Requested Council Action: - Motion to accept the Proclamation Background: This Proclamation recognizes June as LGBTQIA+ Pride Month in the City of Brooklyn Center Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proclamation of LGBTQIA Pride Month 2025 Page 62 of 96 Proclamation DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF JUNE 2025 AS LGBTQ+ PRIDE MONTH WHEREAS, our nation was founded on the principle of equal rights for all people, but the fulfillment of this promise has long been coming for many Americans. Some of the most inspiring moments in our history have arisen from the various civil rights movements that have brought one group after another from the margins to the mainstream of American society; and WHEREAS, in the movement toward equal rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBTQ+) people, a historic turning point occurred on June 28, 1969, in New York City, with the onset of the Stonewall Riots. During these riots, LGBTQ+ citizens rose up and resisted police harassment that arose out of discriminatory criminal laws that have since been declared unconstitutional. In the four decades since, civil rights for LGBTQ+ people have grown substantially, and LGBTQ+ pride celebrations have taken place around the country every June to commemorate the beginning of the Stonewall Riots; and WHEREAS, while civil rights are advancing, there is still further progress needed; it is essential to recognize and celebrate the substantial gains that have been achieved; and WHEREAS, LGBTQ+ residents in Brooklyn Center represent our families, friends, neighbors, teachers, employees, and community leaders. Across all religions, races, and communities, LGBTQ+ people are helping us become a perfect union in reaching our ideals proclaimed in our Declaration of Independence that all “people” are created equal and deserve to be embraced and treated as equals. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mayor Graves, Mayor of the City of Brooklyn Center, on behalf of the Brooklyn Center City Council and residents of Brooklyn Center, do hereby proclaim June 2025 as “LGBTQ+ Pride Month” in the City of Brooklyn Center and call upon its residents to eliminate prejudice everywhere it exists and celebrate the diversity of our community. ___June 9th, 2025_ __________________ Date Mayor ATTEST: __________________ City Clerk 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy Brooklyn Center, MN 55433 Page 63 of 96 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 6/9/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Lydia Ener, Assistant City Engineer THROUGH: Elizabeth Heyman, Director of Public Works BY: Lydia Ener, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Public Works Update Requested Council Action: Motion to accept the presentation. Background: Lydia Ener will give an overview of what the Public Works and Engineering Department accomplished in 2024 and the goals we are working towards in 2025. Budget Issues: NA Inclusive Community Engagement: NA Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: NA Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: None Page 64 of 96 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 6/9/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Ian Alexander, Economic Development Manager, Ginny McIntosh, Planning Manager, Xiong Thao, Housing and Community Standards Supervisor, Dan Grinsteinner, Building Official THROUGH: Jesse Anderson, Community Development Director BY: Jesse Anderson, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Community Development Annual Report Requested Council Action: - Motion to accept presentation Background: This memo provides a summary of the Community Development Department's activities, accomplishments, and initiatives in 2024/2025. Our department continues to work toward enhancing the quality of life in Brooklyn Center through careful planning, regulatory oversight, economic growth, housing, and code enforcement. Department Mission The Community Development Department’s mission is to ensure balanced growth, foster economic development, and provide services to both residents and businesses. By guiding the city’s development through effective planning, zoning, building oversight, economic development and code compliance, we strive to maintain Brooklyn Center as a thriving, diverse community. Organizational Structure The Community Development Department is led by a Community Development Director. Reporting to this role are the Building Official, Housing and Community Standards Manager, Economic Development Manager, and Planning Manager. The department includes various positions such as Building Inspectors, Code Enforcement and Housing Inspectors, Economic Development Coordinator, and Associate Planner, supported by Administrative Assistants and Interns. Overview of Services The department provides a comprehensive range of services, including: • Building and Community Standards o Building Construction Regulatory Program o Rental Licensing Program o Property Maintenance and Code Enforcement o Vacant Building Program o HRA/Housing Programs Page 65 of 96 • Business and Development o Planning and Zoning Services o Long Range Strategic Planning o EDA/Economic Development Programs o Business Retention and Expansion Program o Workforce Development Rental Program As of June 3, 2025, Brooklyn Center has approximately 3,608 rental units, making up 30.3% of the total 11,903 housing units. There are 668 active rental licenses, with 52.1% being three-year licenses, 31% two-year, 11.1% one-year, and 5.8% six-month provisional licenses. There are 43 expired licenses and 175 inactive group home properties. Key accomplishments in the Rental Program include: • Educating new apartment owners and property managers on the city's rental license program, inspections, and ongoing property maintenance. • Attending Resident Council meetings at Sonder House and engaging with senior management regarding tenant concerns. • Providing ongoing education on Tenant Protections to property owners/managers and tenants. Goals for the Rental Program include: • Sending out a Tenant Resource packet to all residents in Fall 2025. • Holding a Tenant Protection work session with the city council in Fall 2025. • Conducting a Rental License Program work session focusing on the points system with the city council in Fall 2025. • Updating the Rental Policy Process and Procedure Handbook. • Continuing to improve and automate rental license renewals and the program in iMS. Property Maintenance and Code Enforcement The department operates complaint-based and proactive code enforcement programs, including neighborhood and corridor sweeps. In 2024, there were 3,374 code enforcement cases, and as of year-to-date 2025, there have been 1,890 cases. Staff conduct door-to-door visits to discuss violations and engage with residents around vacant properties. There has been an increase in illegal dumping on commercial properties and vacant lots, and increased loitering on vacant EDA properties. For 2025/2026, initiatives include: • Completing a sweep of the entire city by the end of 2025 and restarting in 2026. • Continuing proactive and complaint-based enforcement activities, including door knocking and providing education. • Monitoring commercial vacant properties daily for trespassers and abating trash and dumping immediately. Page 66 of 96 • Proactive tall grass enforcement in May, as "No Mow May" was opted out of for 2025. • Ordinance amendments and additions to Chapter 12 and Chapter 19, addressing commercial addressing, commercial vehicle size, and occupied abatement. Vacant Building Program As of June 3, 2025, there are 65 active vacant properties. Notable commercial vacant properties include Sears, which has been sold with an active property management team, and the former Brown College, which is in the tax forfeiture process. Tall grass and weeds violations remain an issue, with one notice given for the entire growing season. Building Division Initiatives/Accomplishments (2024/2025) • Updated fixed fee permit schedule. • Continued cross-training in preparation for the Opportunity Site. • Updated handouts and brochures. • Reviewed updated codes for 2026 adoption. • Secured a new Electrical Inspection Contractor. • Updated the iMS permit flow. • Hired a Building Inspector Intern. • Provided continuous education to DIY Property Owners and Contractors. • Implemented a Change of Use review for single-family homes converting to MDH Assisted Living facilities, requiring Building Official review. Building Permit Project Valuation has fluctuated, with 2025 year-to-date at $9,887,780. The number of permits per year has also varied, with 1259 permits issued year-to-date in 2025. Planning Despite market conditions, 2025 has seen new development, repurposing of vacant properties, and re-filled tenant spaces. Planning case applications processed to date in 2025 include: 3 Site and Building Plans, 2 Conditional Use Permits, 1 Subdivision, 1 PUD/Amendment, 1 UDO/Ordinance Amendment, and 2 Concept Plan Reviews. Key initiatives for 2025/2026 in Planning and Zoning include: • Continuing to review the Unified Development Ordinance. • Implementing cannabis regulations and processing applications. • Monitoring and addressing "Missing Middle" legislation. • Streamlining the development process to enhance competitiveness. • Starting preparatory work for the 2050 Comprehensive Plan. • Initiating the Home Rehab Loan Program with a tentative start date of July 1, 2025, with an estimated funding of close to $500,000. • Continuing to explore funding opportunities for the Housing Trust Fund, adopted in 2025. Page 67 of 96 • Focusing on the initial phase development of the Opportunity Site. • Strengthening and diversifying business development and housing in priority areas such as the former Sears, former Target, former Brown College, 57th and Logan, Opportunity Site, and Shingle Creek Crossing. Construction Activity (2024-2025) Newly opened or opening soon establishments include Wangstad Commons (Dec 2024), Los Campeones Gym (Dec 2024), Pollo Campero (March 2025), ACER Innovation and Catalyst Center (April 2025), Surly Brewing Company - Fermentation Tanks (May 2025), Icon Beauty (June 2025), MTI Distributing Expansion (Summer 2025), Oh Pretti! Events and Rentals (Summer 2025), LC Coffee Lounge (Summer 2025), and Hello Fresh Distribution (Summer 2025), with ongoing Medtronic Capital Improvements. Economic Development • EDA-Owned Scattered Sites: RFP materials are being prepared for initial offerings at 902 53rd Avenue North, 7000 Brooklyn Boulevard, and 1601 James Circle North, with potential for additional sites in 2025. • Opportunity Site: Phase 1 (South End) financing is being structured by Alatus, seeking financial partners, bonding, and TIF legislation. • For the North End, a MOU with Minneapolis is in place, Sports Facility development partners and site acquisition partners are in discussions. • The Opportunity Zone is expected to be renewed, providing federal and tax incentives for investment, with goal to push for state legislation targeting Brooklyn Center's Opportunity Zone. • ARPA Fund Activities include support for Market Plaza, NEOO Phase 1 and 2, Sanders Technical Assistance, Kandiyo Consulting Environmental Consulting, Thrive Growth plan and Business Improved Districts, Fortis Capital Equity Fund Program, Brooklyn Center Chamber of Commerce, Collaborative Design Group and Design by Melo, DJR architects fit plan for Opportunity Site, and Shingle Creek Crossing Daylighting. • Small Business Support: Initiatives include Equity Fund Development, Brooklyn Center Chamber of Commerce resources, Facade improvement fund, Elevate Business - Onsight Navigator and Consultants, and BrookLynk (contracted through Brooklyn Park). • Shingle Creek Crossing: Efforts include daylighting Shingle Creek and applying for a MN Dept of Natural Resources Grant. • The Sears Site was sold to Scannell Properties, who currently have no immediate plans but are seeking development partners. • Jambo Africa: Development Agreement is are being negotiated, including technical assistance for site planning and financial structuring. • Morty's Bark & Brew: Development Agreement are being negotiated, including technical assistance for site planning, financial structuring, and discussions regarding environmental cleanup. • Townhouse Proposals: The 5400 Block Brooklyn Boulevard Townhouse Proposal is awaiting materials from Amani Construction. Page 68 of 96 • C. Allen Homes Townhomes, lender foreclosure is complete, and the lender is seeking a new developer. • Slumberland/Dollar Tree: Preliminary talks are underway with Restaurant Depot regarding expansion/relocation to the Slumberland site. • 6200/6300 Shingle Creek Parkway: Discussions are ongoing with owners to assist with re-purposing options and site maximization. 2025/2026 Economic Development Initiatives • Continue initiatives for the Sports Facility. • Continue initiatives for the First Responder Education and Wellness Facility. • Continue initiatives for Phase 1 Opportunity Site. • Complete Equity Fund structure. • Monitor grant opportunities. • Continue small business opportunities. • Implement the Economic Growth Plan. Conclusion The Community Development Department made significant progress in 2024 and 2025 and remains dedicated to enhancing Brooklyn Center. From addressing housing and code enforcement issues to driving economic development and ensuring the success of major construction projects, our team remains focused on building a vibrant, resilient community. As we move forward into 2025 and 2026, we will continue to seek opportunities to foster growth, and quality of life for all residents and businesses. Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. CD Department Annual Report 06-2025 (1) Page 69 of 96 Community Development Department Annual Report Jesse Anderson, Community Development Director Page 70 of 96 Community Development Mission 2 The mission of the Community Development Department is to preserve and enhance the quality of life for the residents and businesses of Brooklyn Center by guiding development of the City with effective measures of planning, design review, construction plan approval, code compliance, housing and business assistance . Page 71 of 96 3 Community Development Organizational Chart Building Official Community Development Director Building Inspector Building Inspector Building Inspector Code Enforcement and Housing Inspector Code Enforcement and Housing Inspector Code Enforcement and Housing Inspector Code Enforcement and Housing Inspector Code Enforcement Intern Housing and Community Standards Manager BrookLynk Intern Economic Development Coordinator Economic Development Manager Associate Planner Planning Manager Administrative Assistant Administrative Assistant Page 72 of 96 •Building Construction Regulatory Program •Rental Licensing Program •Property Maintenance and Code Enforcement •Vacant Building Program •HRA/Housing Programs 4 •Planning and Zoning Services •Long Range Strategic Planning •EDA/Economic Development Programs •Business Retention and Expansion Program •Workforce Development Overview of Services Building and Community Standards Business and Development Page 73 of 96 5 •Process, track, and perform rental inspections •City-wide resource packet to all renters •Investigate and resolve property complaints •Investigate and enforce unlicensed rental properties •Provide education on Tenant Protection Ordinances Overview of Services Performance-based Rental Licensing Program •Rental licensing administration •CPTED Inspections •Negotiate rental plans for Type III and Type IV licenses •Inspecting 100% of multi-family units Page 74 of 96 Rental Program 6 •Out of 11,903 total housing units - approximately 3,608 rental units (30.3%) •8,300 SF Homes/514 SF Rentals (6.2%) •668 Active Rental Licenses •52.1% - Three-year licenses •31% - Two-year licenses •11.1% - One-year licenses •5.8% - Six-month provisional licenses •Expired Licenses: 43 •175 Inactive Group Home Properties Brooklyn Center Housing Data – Excluding Expired Licenses Page 75 of 96 7 Rental Program Accomplishments and Goals Accomplishments •Multiple apartment owner and property manager changes resulting in education on the city's rental license program, working through inspections, and ongoing property maintenance. •Attended 3 Resident Council meetings at Sonder House re: tenant concerns and met with senior management regarding tenant concerns •Ongoing education of Tenant Protections with property owners/managers and tenants •Increase enforcement and education on Just cause non -renewal. Goals •Tenant Resource packet to be sent out to all residents in Fall 2025 •Tenant Protection work session with city council in Fall 2025 •Rental License Program specifically rental license points system work session with city council in Fall 2025 •Update Rental policy process and procedure handbook •Continue to improve and automate rental license renewals and program in iMS. Page 76 of 96 8 •Complaint-based Program •Proactive Code Enforcement Program •Neighborhood Sweeps •Long grass •Corridor Sweeps •Commercial Property •Code Enforcement Engagement Program •Inspection staff will knock on doors to talk to residents about code violations found at the property. Talk to residents around vacant properties. •Administer citations and abatements •YTD – A quarter of the city has been swept for code violations •2024 –3,374Code Enforcement Cases •2025 YTD –1,890 Code Enforcement Cases •Increase in illegal dumping on commercial properties and vacant lots •Increase loitering on vacant EDA properties Property Maintenance and Code Enforcement Overview of Services Page 77 of 96 9 Status: •65 active vacant properties (6/3/2025) Commercial Vacant Properties •Sears has been sold and has an active property management team •Former Brown College is in the tax forfeiture process and the County has been active in property management of the building •EDA properties will be mowed on an as needed basis to save costs Tall grass and weeds violations continues to be an issue. Grass violations are given 1 notice for the entire grass growing season . Overview of Services Vacant Building Program Page 78 of 96 10 Code Enforcement •Complete sweep of the entire city by end of 2025 and restart in 2026 •Continue pro-active and complaint-based code enforcement activity •Door knocking and providing education with a follow and a formal compliance notice •Monitoring commercial vacant property daily for trespassers and abating trash and dumping immediately •No Mow May •2025 opted out, proactive tall grass enforcement in Month of May •Ordinance amendments and additions to Chapter 12 and Chapter 19 •Commercial addressing •Commercial vehicle size change •Occupied abatement 2025/26 Code Enforcement Initiatives Page 79 of 96 11 •Updated fixed fee permit schedule •Continue cross-training in preparation for Opportunity Site •Update handouts and brochures •Review updated codes for 2026 adoption •New Electrical Inspection Contractor •IMS permit flow update in process •Building Inspector Intern •Continuous education with DIY Property Owners and Contractors •Single family homes converting to MDH Assisted Living facilities require a Change of Use review (new CO) that requires Building Official review 2024/25 Building Division Initiatives/Accomplishments Page 80 of 96 12 2025 Planning Activities (to date) Planning Case Applications •3– Site and Building Plans •2– Conditional Use Permits •1– Subdivisions (Platting and Minor Subdivisions/Lot Splits) •1– PUD (Planned Unit Development) / Amendments •1– UDO/ Ordinance Amendments •2– Concept Plan Review 2025 Planning Highlights (to date) Despite market conditions, we saw some new development, the conversion of vacant property repurposed for new use, and tenant spaces re-filled •UDO Amendments •Expansion projects planned for this summer along Brooklyn Boulevard •New businesses in Humboldt Shopping Center •Restart of construction on C Alan triplex site (South Site) •Interest in potential additional density at existing multi-family residential and potential housing development Planning Page 81 of 96 13 Planning and Zoning •Continue reviewing Unified Development Ordinance for opportunities to strengthen/clarify document •Implement cannabis regulations and begin processing applications •Monitor and be proactive in addressing ongoing "Missing Middle" legislation •Review opportunities to be more efficient and streamlined with development process so Brooklyn Center can be more competitive •Some cities have been proactively streamlining their development approval processes to remove conditional uses and provide additional routes for administrative approvals (e .g. Rochester, Bloomington, Wayzata, Richfield) •Start prep work for the 2050 Comprehensive Plan (!) •Housing Policy Pan •Local Affordable Housing Act (LAHA) •Initiate Home Rehab Loan Program with a tentative start date of July 1, 2025 •Will review options for 2025 funds, when funding amount is determined . (Estimated to be close to $500,000) •Housing Trust Fund – Adopted in 2025 – Continue to explore funding opportunities •Opportunity Site – Initial Phase Development •Continue to seek additional opportunities for funding and identify development opportunities elsewhere within the site. Strengthen and Diversify Business Development and Housing Priority Areas:Former Sears, Former Target, Former Brown College, 57th and Logan, Opportunity Site Implementation, minimizing vacancies in existing retail spaces, and continued build out of Shingle Creek Crossing 2025/2026 Initiatives Page 82 of 96 14 •Wangstad Commons (December 2024) •Los Campeones Gym (December 2024) •Pollo Campero (March 2025) •ACER Innovation and Catalyst Center (April 2025) •Surly Brewing Company – Fermentation Tanks (May 2025) •Icon Beauty (June 2025) •MTI Distributing Expansion (Summer 2025) •Oh Pretti! Events and Rentals (Summer 2025) •LC Coffee Lounge (Summer 2025) •Hello Fresh Distribution (Summer 2025) •Medtronic Capital Improvements (Ongoing) 2024-2025 Construction Activity Now Open | Opening Soon | Investment Page 83 of 96 Construction Activity 15Page 84 of 96 16 •EDA-Owned Scattered Sites •Preparing RFP materials •Initial offerings to include: 902 53rd Avenue North 7000 Brooklyn Boulevard 1601 James Circle North •Additional sites may be added later in 2025, depending upon response Economic Development Page 85 of 96 17 •Opportunity Site: Phase 1 (South End) •Alatus continues structuring financing •Seeking financial partners •Bonding •TIF Legislation •Opportunity Site: North End •MOU with Minneapolis •Sports Facility development partners •Site acquisition partners Economic Development Page 86 of 96 18 •Opportunity Zone: Special Legislation •Opportunity Zones expected to be renewed, providing federal tax incentives •State legislation to provide state incentives for investment •State legislation to target Brooklyn Center's Opportunity Zone Economic Development Page 87 of 96 19 ARPA Fund Activities •Market Plaza •NEOO Phase 1 – Support City Led development •NEOO Phase 2 Technical Assistance •Sanders Technical Assistance program •Kandiyo Consulting Environmental Consulting •Thrive Growth plan and Business improved Districts •Fortis Capital Equity Fund Program •Brooklyn Center Chamber of Commerce •Collaborative Design Group and Design by Melo, DJR architects fit plan for Opportunity Site •Shingle Creek Crossing Daylighting Economic Development Page 88 of 96 20 Small Business Support •Equity Fund Development •Brooklyn Center Chamber of Commerce •Resources •Facade improvement fund •Elevate Business – Onsight Navigator and Consultants July 17, 2025 •BrookLynk – Contracted Through Brooklyn Park •CareerForce Center Economic Development Page 89 of 96 21 Economic Development Grant Update Opportunity Site Entrepreneurial Market Plaza (EMP)LCDA Development $1,500,000 Awarded Opportunity Site, PPL and RFWM TOD Development $2,000,000 Awarded Opportunity Site Phase 1, RFWM LCA Pre-Development $300,000 Awarded Opportunity Site, Public Infrastructure TEDI $500,000 Awarded Opportunity Site Infrastructure Hennepin County TOC $400,000 Awarded Opportunity Site Infrastructure Hennepin County TOD $500,000 Awarded Brooklyn Center Phase 1 Public Infrastructure 2024 TOD Development $2,000,000 Awarded Minnesota’s Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Grant for Land Acquistion (Shingle Creek Daylighting Grant) MN Dept of Natural Resources $6,000,000 Applied /Pending MN DOT Technical Assistance Grant MN DOT $30,000 Awarded Reconnecting Neighborhoods Grant Federal DOT $2,000,000 Program Cancelled Community Change Grant Federal EPA $20,000,000 Program Cancelled RAISE Grant Federal DOT $800,000 Program Cancelled Page 90 of 96 22 Shingle Creek Crossing •Daylighting Shingle Creek •Applied for MN Dept of Natural Resources Grant •Anticipated award in July/August 2025 •Watershed to perform daylighting Sears Site •Transformco sold property to Scannell Properties •Scannell has no immediate plans for site •Seeking development partners Economic Development Page 91 of 96 23 Morty's Bark & Brew •Negotiating Development Agreement •Technical assistance for site planning and financial structuring •In discussions with MPCA and Hennepin County regarding any required cleanup prior to site development Jambo Africa •Negotiating Development Agreement •Technical assistance for architectural and financial structuring Economic Development Page 92 of 96 24 Townhouse Proposal: 5400 Block Brooklyn Boulevard •Awaiting materials from Amani Construction to draft development agreement C. Allen Homes Townhomes •Lender foreclosure complete •Lender seeking new developer to complete project •Lender working with city staff to identify outstanding work items Economic Development Page 93 of 96 25 Slumberland/Dollar Tree •Preliminary talks with Restaurant Depot •Restaurant Depot may be interested in expanding/relocating to Slumberland site •Relocation would revitalize a large, underutilized location 6200/6300 Shingle Creek Parkway •In discussions with owners •Assisting with re-purposing options and site maximization Economic Development Page 94 of 96 26 2025/2026 Initiatives •Continue initiatives for Sports Facility •Continue initiatives for First Responder Education and Wellness Facility •Continue initiatives for Phase 1 Opportunity Site •Complete Equity Fund structure •Monitor grant opportunities •Continue small business opportunities •Economic Growth Plan Economic Development Page 95 of 96 27 The Community Development Department has worked hard in 2024 addressing the City’s housing, code enforcement, planning, building, and economic development needs while planning for future growth. As we move into 2025, we remain committed to economic development and ensuring that Brooklyn Center is a community where residents and businesses can thrive. Conclusion Page 96 of 96