Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025.07.28 CCP REGULARCITY COUNCIL MEETING City Hall Council Chambers July 28, 2025 AGENDA 1. Call to Order - 7:00 p.m. Attendees please turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full meeting packet is available in the binder at the entrance to the Council Chambers. 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Informal Open Forum This is an opportunity for the public to address the City Council on items that are not on the agenda. It is limited to 15 minutes. It may not be used to make personal attacks, air personal grievances, make political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with the presenter. Questions from the Council will be for clarification purposes only. It will not be used as a time for problem-solving or reacting to the comments made but for hearing the presenter for informational purposes only. The first call will be for those that have notified the Clerk that they would like to speak during the open forum and then ask if anyone connected to this meeting would like to speak. When called upon, please indicate your name and then proceed. Please be sure to state your name before speaking. a. Meeting Decorum 5. Invocation Councilmember Kragness 6. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda These items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There isn't a separate discussion for these items unless a Councilmember so requests, then it is moved to the end of the Council Consideration Items. a. Approval of Minutes b. Approval of Licenses c. Resolution Identifying the Need for LCA Predevelopment Funding and Authorizing an Application for Grant Funds for Amani Construction & Development, LLC for Townhomes at the 5400 block of Brooklyn Blvd d. Resolution Adopting the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report of the City of Brooklyn Center for the Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2024 7. Presentations/Proclamations/Recognitions/Donations Page 1 of 74 a. 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update b. Parliamentary Procedures and Robert's Rules of Order Review 8. Public Hearings 9. Planning Commission Items 10. Council Consideration Items 11. Council Report 12. Adjournment Page 2 of 74 COUNCIL MEETING DECORUM To ensure meetings are conducted in a professional and courteous manner which enables the orderly conduct of business, all persons in attendance or who participate in such meetings shall conduct themselves in a manner that does not interfere with the ability of others to observe and, when allowed, to participate without disruption or fear of intimidation. A. Decorum. Persons who attend meetings must avoid conduct that disrupts, interferes with, or disturbs the orderly conduct of the meeting or the ability of other attendees to observe and participate as appropriate. To that end, persons who attend meetings are subject to the following: (1) Members of the public may only speak during meetings when allowed under Council Rules and only after being recognized by the presiding officer. The presiding officer may establish time limits for the acceptance of public comments or testimony. (2) Public comments or testimony must be addressed to the presiding officer and not to other Council Members, staff, or others in attendance. (3) All elected officials shall be referred to by their proper title and surname. (4) Public comments should avoid personal accusations, profanity, or other improper content for a public meeting. (5) Intimidating behaviors, threats of hostility, or actual violence are disallowed. (6) Audible demonstrations intended to disrupt the meeting should be avoided, including stomping of feet, snapping of fingers, clapping of hands, and other conduct that may be intimidating or threatening to others. (7) Holding, displaying, or placing banners, signs, objects, or other materials in any way that endangers others, prevents the free flow of individuals within the chamber, or obstructs or prevents the viewing of the meeting by others is not allowed. B. The presiding officer shall request any person(s) who disrupt, interfere with or disturb the orderly conduct of a meeting to cease the conduct and, as necessary, shall issue an oral warning to the individual(s) found to be in violation. If the individual(s) persists in disrupting, interfering with, or disturbing the meeting, the presiding officer may have the individual(s) removed or, under appropriate circumstances, temporarily clear the gallery. If for any reason the presiding officer fails to take such action, a majority vote may be substituted for action by the presiding officer to maintain order and decorum over the proceedings. C. The Council Chambers capacity is 76 persons per fire code. Page 3 of 74 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 7/28/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes Requested Council Action: Motion to approve the following minutes: • July 14, 2025, Study Session • July 14, 2025, Regular Session Background: Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2025.07.14 SS - unapproved 2. 2025.07.14 CC - unapproved Page 4 of 74 7/14/25 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION JULY 14, 2025 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session, called to order by Mayor April Graves at 6:04 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor April Graves and Councilmembers Dan Jerzak, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, and Laurie Ann Moore. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards, Interim City Clerk Shannon Pettit, and City Attorney Siobhan Tolar. Councilmember Teneshia Kragness was excused. CITY COUNCIL MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION ITEMS Councilmember Jerzak discussed the unintended consequences of the enlargement of the letters for public safety. He gave an example of the Fire Hall, where letters had to be carved into the building, as well as anything that had to be carved into granite or stone, and how problematic that is. He stated that he would own his role in voting in favor of this in the past, but would like to revisit this issue as a Council and have a complete work session. Councilmember Jerzak asked if there could be a poll done with the Council to stay any enforcement of this issue until the Council can work through it, and either repeal it or modify it. Mayor Graves stated she is open to having that discussion and should not be needlessly strict on everyone being in compliance. Councilmember Moore asked if anyone had the Code of Ordinance, and if the Council could do a stay of revocation in the motion. Mayor Graves stated this issue was about something different. Councilmember Moore confirmed she was talking about the same thing Councilmember Jerzak was discussing, and asked City Manager Reggie Edwards to clarify. Dr. Edwards stated that if there is a consensus of the Council, then no action will be taken by City Staff until it comes back to deliberation with the Council. Page 5 of 74 7/14/25 -2- DRAFT Mayor Graves asked if there was an agreement with the Council on not enforcing the ordinance regarding address numbers. All Councilmembers agreed. Mayor Graves said she had an amendment to the regular agenda with a motion to go into closed session before the public hearing. Councilmember Jerzak asked what Mayor Graves is referring to. Mayor Graves stated she would like the Council to go into a closed session so they can discuss the statute with the City Attorney before the public hearing. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to add a closed session before the public hearing during the regular session meeting. Councilmember Moore stated that Dr. Edwards had provided some updates in the weekly summary regarding the park permitting and the process, as well as responses from residents when things have not gone as planned within the parks. She asked if this was something that the Council needed to revisit and talk about whether there should be any permits. She also asked for a status update on cameras being put up in the parks. Dr. Edwards said that regarding noise violations and residents not following policies with their permits, he asked that those issues come back to the Council towards the end of the summer to be discussed. This time frame would give City Staff time to see how everything played out for the enforcement of policies, and the response from citizens, as well as provide more information for the Council. Dr. Edwards said he did not think there were any cameras purchased for the parks. The City does have trailers that can be used as a strategy to address some issues, if there is potential for incidents. Dr. Edwards said that when he comes back and reports how the Parks and Recreation Department is addressing some issues in the parks, the camera issue can be addressed then, too. Councilmember Moore said she was out on Saturday evening, and one of the trailers was deployed at North Park, and there was no one there. She said she did not know if that was good or bad, but a resident did reach out to her and said the trailer had been deployed on Wednesday. Councilmember Jerzak asked about cameras in the parks and thought that Crime Prevention had provided cameras and brackets a while ago to use and deploy at various places in conjunction with the Police Department. He asked that when Dr. Edwards makes his presentation, the camera issue be addressed and clarified. Councilmember Jerzak got a message from at least one resident who was very happy with the deployment of the camera trail and wanted to acknowledge that. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson made a correction to the minutes; on page two of the regular session, Senator Pau's name is misspelled. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson also asked about addressing people by title in the minutes versus Mr. and noted that in the previous minutes, Keith Flesland is referred to as Mr. Flesland. She asked if there could be a conversation with Chief Flesland to find out what he would prefer to be addressed as. Her perspective is that if she were reading the minutes for the first time, she may not know who Mr. Flesland is. Page 6 of 74 7/14/25 -3- DRAFT Dr. Edwards stated that the minutes are done by a service and can be edited afterwards by City Staff. They want to be consistent with all individuals when referring to titles and will ensure that titles are assigned correctly. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson said that is what she thought, and asked City Attorney Siohban Tolar if City Staff approves the minutes with the corrections that are going to be made, or if City Staff does not approve the minutes. Ms. Tolar asked if Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson was referring to approving the minutes with the edits that have been put on the record, in addition to the future edits. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson said no. In the minutes, Chief Flesland is referred to as Mr., and they have agreed to be consistent with using titles, so do the minutes with amendments to make those changes, get approved, or do the minutes get rejected? Ms. Tolar said no, the minutes do not get rejected; the minutes get approved with the amendment. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson thanked her for the clarification. Dr. Edwards stated he would like to move the Strategic Planning Update Report to the next meeting, as the Deputy City Manager is out on a personal matter and is presenting on that item. That item will need to be moved to July 28. He asked that the Council move up the work session item on permitted districts for commercial animal establishments from the work session to the study session. Mayor Graves asked if everybody was ok with that. Council agreed. Mayor Graves said she is going camping tomorrow, and Councilmember Kragness is already out of town. With both Mayor Graves and Councilmember Kragness out of town, it would fall to Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson as the most senior Councilmember. Councilmember Moore asked if Mayor Graves and Councilmember Kragness would be out of town for next Monday's meeting. Mayor Graves said she would be back on Sunday, and Councilmember Kragness will be back on Saturday. Councilmember Jerzak asked that when Dr. Edwards presents at the end of the summer about the park's progress, he include a legal opinion on what the City can and cannot do to regulate the size of events. He mentioned that Director Wiseman noted that the Parks and Recreation Department can not force people to use Centennial Park, but was wondering if there are regulations regarding the size of an event, then the City could require citizens to use a certain park with a permit. Mayor Graves said she thought those requirements were already in place, but she does not know if the Council got that information from the Parks and Recreation Department. Page 7 of 74 7/14/25 -4- DRAFT CITY MANAGER MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION ITEMS CITY LIQUOR STORE #2 DISCUSSION Dr. Edwards stated that the Director and Liquor Store Manager were present, and he also communicated with all the Councilmembers collectively that he would like to know if the Council had any interest in reviewing a potential three-year lease for Liquor Store #2. Dr. Edwards stated that the Council had already deliberated on this issue and made a decision to move to a six-month lease, which, by default, led to the eventual closure of Liquor Store #2, and that process had begun. Liquor Store #2 has started to deplete its inventory and make plans to remove the interior components of the store to bring it back to a bare commercial building. Doors to Liquor Store #2 will be closed by August 1, and the transition of Staff will happen at that time. Staff that need to transition are three full-time positions and 12 part-time positions. Dr. Edwards said there was new information regarding the audit that needed to be brought to the Council's attention. The audit demonstrated that the liquor stores did, in fact, generate revenue in 2024. At this point, he is not able to distinguish whether all that revenue came from Liquor Store #1 or #2, but the assessment of the Staff is that there is some portion of the net income in 2024 that would pertain to Liquor Store #2. The audit numbers are not broken down by stores. Dr. Edwards asked if the Council would be open to considering a three-year lease option for Liquor Store #2, based on the new audit information that the Liquor Stores did have a net gain in 2024, along with projections around net gains specifically for Liquor Store #2 over the next few years. If the Council is not interested in revisiting the topic, Liquor Store #2 will move forward with shutting down operations. If the Council is open to considering it, then City Staff will bring back the lease option at the July 28 meeting, and Liquor Store Staff will hold off on closing efforts. Mayor Graves thanked Dr. Edwards for the new information. Councilmember Jerzak stated that in a previous one-on-one meeting with Dr. Edwards, they had an honest conversation about Liquor Store #2, and any Councilmember has to be open and willing to take a look at new financial information. After reading the memorandum provided to the Council and considering the new audit information, he remains steadfast in closing Liquor Store #2 and is not willing to revisit the issue. A number of issues influenced his decision, and publicly, he wanted to say that he thoroughly reviewed all of the information provided and was open to new information regarding the store, but he also did not want to revisit every decision that the Council made. He stated he shared some valuable information with Dr. Edwards in their one-on-one meeting, but he is not willing to litigate decisions that were made or not made, nor is it his intention to embarrass any of the Staff or previous decisions. Mayor Graves asked if any other Councilmembers wanted to weigh in. Councilmember Moore concurred with Councilmember Jerzak’s statement; she also would not support a three-year lease option for Liquor Store #2. She stated that rather than going through all of the reasoning, she was very clear in previous meetings about how she felt. The City still has one Liquor Store open and does not see the added value of having two stores, so debating over the Page 8 of 74 7/14/25 -5- DRAFT A/C units and a new roof does not matter to her. She does not see Liquor Store #2 as a valuable asset to the City. The employees who have worked diligently at the store are an asset, but looking at the total impact of keeping that store open for all residents, the Council cannot continue to subsidize the store. Even with projections presented to the Council, the projections do not break down income from last year for Liquor Store #2, and previous projections in presentations were all proposed for this year. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson concurred with Councilmember Jerzak and Councilmember Moore for reasons that she said she has stated before, and is remaining with her decision to close Liquor Store #2. Mayor Graves stated she remains opposed to closing Liquor Store #2. She stated she thinks it is an asset to the City, and having both stores helps offset the cost of inventory, as explained by City Staff in previous presentations. The plan and changes made by City Staff were reflected in their projections and were convincing. Mayor Graves is disappointed that the rest of the Council will not reconsider closing the store. Councilmember Jerzak said he appreciated Mayor Graves' comment, but he would like to ask some questions out loud to help the Council avoid this situation in the future. He stated he thought very hard about this. He was an employee at the City for a long time and knows what it is like to feel like you could lose your job. He has been laid off before, so he understands all those feelings. He would like the Council to consider, at least for discussion, that they have a feasibility analysis. A feasibility analysis is a comprehensive analysis that evaluates the practicality and potential success of a project, examining various factors like technical, financial, market, and operational aspects, and helps to determine if a project is worth pursuing. The reason he brought up the analysis is that he does not want that Department to feel like it was singled out. He wants all of the information to be front and center. He would like this analysis to be used for the Heritage Center and the Golf Course. An incident just happened at the Golf Course where a bridge went out, and there will be costs associated with repairing that, in addition to what the City already subsidized from the budget. The earlier information is presented to the Council, the better. The Council has known for a long time that the lease was ending for Liquor Store #2, and the Council had their differences of opinion on what was a good lease and what was not. He is disappointed in the cost of closing Liquor Store #2 primarily because the Council tipped its intention early on. All of those factors go into tight finances. He asked if there was any interest amongst the other Councilmembers in taking a look at the feasibility analysis of these types of special enterprise funds to help bring the facts to light in the future. Councilmember Moore asked if Councilmember Jerzak was asking a question of the other Councilmembers. Mayor Graves asked if Councilmember Moore had a comment first. Councilmember Moore stated that she agrees with Councilmember Jerzak. Prior to being a Councilmember at the end of last year, the Council received information with projected ideas to increase income at the Heritage Center, and at that time, at least one Councilmember talked about being a landlord. There was also a vibrant discussion regarding the Golf Course and what the Page 9 of 74 7/14/25 -6- DRAFT future may hold for that special revenue fund. She is in agreement that a feasibility analysis is long overdue. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson said she has no other comments. Mayor Graves asked if that was in response to Councilmember Jerzak’s question. Councilmember Jerzak asked Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson if she would be interested in the Council conducting a feasibility analysis. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson responded yes. Mayor Graves stated that it is the Council's consensus to conduct a feasibility analysis. Dr. Edwards stated that at some point, the City will be doing feasibility studies, and they do take time and money, but the City will be doing them. STRATEGIC PLANNING UPDATE AND REPORTING This item has been moved to the meeting on July 28. PERMITTED DISTRICTS FOR COMMERCIAL ANIMAL ESTABLISHMENTS This item has been moved from the Work Session to the Study Session. Dr. Edwards introduced Associate City Planner Krystin Eldridge, who will be presenting on this issue. Dr. Edwards explained that this item came before the Council in an Open Forum where a comment was made that pertained to humane pet stores, and other Cities had adopted ordinances that ensured pet stores were not purchasing animals from industrialized facilities. The Council had also discussed whether or not pet stores were permitted within the City, so Dr. Edwards had asked City Staff to look into that and present their findings to the Council. Associate City Planner Krystin Eldridge stated that in 2017, Roseville passed a ban on the sale of dogs and cats after HarMar Pet Store closed following years of complaints of animal neglect and abuse. Many Cities have passed similar ordinances since, including Coon Rapids, Columbia Heights, Maple Grove, Shoreview, and Blaine. In 2024, animal advocates approached the legislature to propose a bill that would prohibit the sale of dogs and cats from commercial breeders; however, pet stores may engage with animal shelters, rescues, and other organizations to rehome animals. The bill language stated pet stores already operating for at least one year, and have the same ownership can continue the sale of cats and dogs but any animal offered or sold must be obtained by a USDA licensed or state licensed facility and the license number must be disclosed, and all advertisements must disclose the breeder's state or USDA license number. The bill proposed that local units of government may enforce stricter guidelines via ordinance regarding the transfer of ownership of animals or the prohibition of selling or offering animals for sale by a pet dealer or other entity. The bill ultimately did not pass the legislative session. Page 10 of 74 7/14/25 -7- DRAFT Ms. Eldridge continued that Megan Helling of The Humane Society has presented stories from other families regarding the inhumane practices of pet store acquisition and asserts that pet stores do not consider animal welfare when purchasing or selling dogs. Dogs are not walked, touched, or offered any physical wellness checks within this system. The Humane Society Fact Sheet criticizes USDA Oversight as a broken system with weak enforcement, without the ability to ensure the overall health of the animals. It is a widely accepted practice of the pet store industry to accept animals from puppy mills or to operate as commercial breeding facilities themselves. There has not been a commitment to prevent animal cruelty or ensure the health and welfare of the animals before being placed in new homes. Even if pet stores offer extensive paperwork from reputable pet organizations, there are still instances of neglect reported, as well as health issues and even death for the animals after being adopted. The Humane Society is engaging with the Cities to help tackle this issue. Ms. Eldridge noted that under the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), Chapter 35 Zoning regulates Commercial Animal Establishments (formerly kennels) and animal hospitals. The Commercial Animal establishment definition was broadened under the new zoning code to include "Commercial Animal Establishment (formerly kennels). Any business that raises, breeds, sells, boards, distributes, or exhibits animals for either entertainment or education purposes, including but not limited to: kennels, aquariums, pet shops, petting zoos, riding schools or stables, zoological parks, or performing animal exhibitions." Commercial Animal Establishments are permitted in Commercial (C), Business Mixed-Use (MX-B), and Industrial districts (I). Permitted means it does not require City Council approval, and no public review is necessary. Animal hospitals are permitted in every non-residential district except the I district. Some of the City's PUD District properties, like Shingle Creek Crossing, may allow for pet stores and animal hospitals in the underlying C2 District. An example would be that animal hospitals are a special use, and the retail sale of pets is a permitted use. The ability to place standards on the operation through licensing would allow for additional oversight. Ms. Eldridge showed the Council a zoning map of the City and highlighted the light purple and the dark purple shaded areas of the map, as those are areas where commercial kennel establishments are permitted without City review. A small portion of the City that is zoned Commercial (C) is a leftover District from previous zoning that would also allow commercial kennels. The rest of the districts that are not residential would allow animal hospitals. Ms. Eldridge continued that commercial animal establishments are currently allowed in the MX-B, I, and C Districts of the City. She asked if there are any zoning districts that the Council would like City Staff to review and change, or include or restrict use. Ms. Eldridge asked if the Council had any interest in City Staff pursuing an amendment to the City Code of Ordinances that would require the humane sourcing of animals for pet stores/commercial animal establishments. City Staff conducted a review of the City's Code of Ordinances and believes any language would best be located in Chapter 1 (Animals), as it already contains municipal licensing requirements for commercial kennels and standards for commercial kennels. Page 11 of 74 7/14/25 -8- DRAFT Mayor Graves thanked Ms. Eldridge for her presentation and research on the topic. She noted that currently, Brooklyn Center does not have a pet store in the City, but she would be most interested in City Staff pursuing an amendment to the code that would require Humane sourcing of animals. She asked other Councilmembers for opinions or comments. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson concurred with Mayor Graves. No one else wished to comment, and Mayor Graves thanked Ms. Eldridge again for her presentation. Mayor Graves said the only other item under Study Session was a quick discussion around Dr. Edwards’ schedule. Dr. Edwards explained that the schedule presented to the Council is in the annual schedule for performance. There have been some slight modifications to the schedule. On July 28, the Council had agreed to Dr. Edwards' Mid-Year review at that time. At this meeting, the Council will be provided with an evaluation of Dr. Edwards' work, which he has completed for himself. Council will also provide their own individual comments or thoughts on Dr. Edwards' Mid-Year review, to Common Sense, and those comments will be compiled by Common Sense. Common Sense would have a conversation with the Council on the message that would be conveyed to Dr. Edwards on August 18 during the scheduled Mid-Year Review. The August 18 date has been newly added to the schedule, and Dr. Edwards asked if the Council is amenable to that date to have a conversation about his Mid-Year review. The rest of the schedule the Council has already seen, and it takes the Council through the balance of the year, going into a final review and goal setting for 2026. Mayor Graves thanked Dr. Edwards. Councilmember Moore asked about Council feedback regarding Dr. Edwards' appointment being due by July 23. She noted that it is only a week away. Councilmember Moore asked if that would be sent by Common Sense and if that date can be adjusted. Dr. Edwards clarified that the July 23 date is a check-in on the Council's thoughts, and between now and July 23, the Council will have provided their individual feedback on Dr. Edwards' Mid- Year review to Common Sense. Common Sense would come to the July 28 meeting with the summary of the Council's feedback and Dr. Edwards' own performance feedback. The Council could deliberate on that feedback at that time. Councilmember Moore asked if the timeline is still the same, and is due a week from today. Dr. Edwards responded that the timeline can be moved, but that is up to the Council. Mayor Graves asked if Councilmember Moore needed more time. Councilmember Moore asked if Dr. Edwards was doing his performance feedback on the 15th. Dr. Edwards said that is correct, and the Council will have Dr. Edwards' own performance review by then. Councilmember Moore asked if Common Sense is sending the Council a form to fill out, and the Council does not have that form yet, as it is currently July 14. Dr. Edwards confirmed that is correct. Councilmember Page 12 of 74 7/14/25 -9- DRAFT Moore reiterated that if Common Sense gets the form to the Council in a timely fashion, then there still has to be a week turnaround time on that feedback, and a discussion is still scheduled on that feedback on July 28. Dr. Edwards confirmed that all of that information and the timeline is correct. Councilmember Moore said she would see what she could do then, and she is clear on the dates and requirements. She thanked Dr. Edwards. Mayor Graves stated August 18 does not work for her, as she will be out of town to give a presentation for her public health work. Dr. Edwards said that if the Council is open to it, he could send a few different option dates to the Council via email with the City Clerk, and it can be scheduled that way. Mayor Graves said she will be out August 18-22. Councilmember Jerzak said he is flexible and will accommodate her schedule. Councilmember Moore asked if the meeting on August 18 should be a separate date from a regularly scheduled Council meeting, since this is not a regularly scheduled Council date. She asked if it could be scheduled for August 11 or August 25. Mayor Graves suggested meeting earlier on August 25 and utilizing the Study Session. Councilmember Jerzak asked if they could meet at five o'clock on the 25th. Mayor Graves said 5:30 would work better. Mayor Graves said that is a strong suggestion, and hopefully that date works for Councilmember Kragness. Councilmember Jerzak stated it is important that Dr. Edwards gets this feedback on a timely basis. He stated that the Council should do its best to accommodate Dr. Edwards's request out of fairness. Mayor Graves agreed with that statement and asked the Council for any other discussion or questions. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Graves adjourned the Study Session at 6:44 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Page 13 of 74 7/14/25 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION JULY 14, 2025 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor April Graves at 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Mayor April Graves and Councilmembers Dan Jerzak, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, and Laurie Ann Moore. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards, City Planner Krystin Eldridge, Interim City Clerk Shannon Pettit, and City Attorney Siobhan Tolar. Councilmember Teneshia Kragness was absent. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 4. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM Mayor April Graves opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum and reviewed the Rules of Decorum. Syed H. stated he was there representing ownership of the Baymont Inn. Mayor Graves said the Council cannot address items that are on the agenda. Councilmember Moore noted that Syed H. was from Baymont. Mayor Graves apologized and told Syed H. to continue. Syed H. appreciated all the dialogue that he has been having with the Council, and he is working towards restoring the license for the Baymont Inn. An exhaustive list was provided to Baymont to restore the license. Syed H. wanted to bring to the Council's attention that he has completed the list that the City asked him to and is in the final phase of the work required. Syed H. wanted to bring it to the Council's attention that he has been cooperating with the requirements given to him and the City. Syed H. stated that as he looks forward to getting to the Baymont Inn reinstated, hopefully tomorrow, he wanted to assure the Council of his continued cooperation and partnership with the City. Syed H. thanked the Council for the support, as well as Dr. Edwards and City Clerk Page 14 of 74 7/14/25 -2- DRAFT Shannon Pettit for all their help. Syed H. invited the Council to come and look at the property once it has reopened to show the Council the improvements that have been made. Mayor Graves thanked Syed H. and said she would take him up on the invite to the Baymont. She did see the email inviting her to check out the property; she just has not had the time to respond. Syed H. said that whenever the Council has time, he wants to be transparent and show them his commitment. Syed H. noted that the timely reopening of the Baymont is important not just to him but to all of the employees as well, so with the help of the City, he is looking forward to getting beyond that and starting the next chapter. Councilmember Jerzak asked for Syed’s name again. Syed H. spelled his name for the Council and thanked the Council again. Dr. Edwards said online that there is difficulty with the sound, and people are not able to call in. Mayor Graves said that was good to know, but disappointing, and hopefully that will get figured out before the next meeting. Dr. Edwards said the Council should give it a shot and see if people are able to call in and if the sound works. Mayor Graves told Julie B. online to go ahead and see if the Council could hear her speak. Mayor Graves stated that, apparently, there is still an issue as there is no sound, and they cannot hear Julie B. Mayor Graves said City Staff will try to get that addressed and figure out what the bugs are, and asked City Staff to send a message apologizing to people online for the technical difficulties. Sound was restored, and Julie B. can be heard. Julie B. asked if anyone could give her a thumbs up if she could be heard, because she could not hear herself. Someone in the audience gave her a thumbs-up. Julie B. thanked the Council for the opportunity to speak. She missed the discussion that had happened previously because she was not able to hear it, but she wanted to comment on concerns about the budget. Some of the language used around the decisions made regarding the budget. Julie B. stated it is frustrating as a community member not to have explanations for decisions being made regarding budgeting, and the decision about Liquor Store #2. Julie B. said the language calling things fluff pieces is really disparaging to some of the City's Staff who are involved in those projects. She continued that she thinks there is a lack of insight into the impact of labeling things as fluff, and there has not been a lot of clarification from Councilmembers on what they meant by that, but from things that have been discussed by Councilmembers, Julie B. can put two and two together. Julie B. stated she hopes there is more mindfulness moving forward, looking at the impact of some of the projects being mislabeled and the impact of language on the community. Julie B. thanked the Council for their time. Page 15 of 74 7/14/25 -3- DRAFT Mayor Graves thanked Julie B. Naheed called in, but could not be heard. No one else wished to speak. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to close the Informal Open Forum at 7:09 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 5. INVOCATION Mayor Graves shared a poem that she wrote in May of 2025 and presented at the Rise and Remember Event at George Floyd Square called "In Their Steps." “Breathe in deep the air our ancestors shaped. Winds that carried voices raised, whispers of struggle, echoes of fight, woven through time both day and night. They tried to bend us, knowing we’ll never break. The situation suspect, the motives opaque. Yet through the mist, truth remains steady as fire, bold as flames. Walk steady where they once stood, feet pressed firm and soiled in wood. Marching hearts, relentless strides, bearing hope where fear resides. Much as we long for a moment’s reprieve, when the distressed call sounds, we must believe. This moment, asking what we’re truly about. Faith in our roots or tangled in doubt. We breathe for those stripped of their air, stolen by hatred or lost to despair. Whose cries were drowned in passages deep or silenced where sirens sweep. For those chained beneath the stolen sky, torn from home with no goodbye, cast adrift on waves of grief, their names unspoken, their pain unleashed. For those struck down in flashing light, their bodies broken, stolen rights. No crime but life, no sin but skin, lost to hands that won't rescind. For lands erased, for voices lost, for history's silence, for lives that paid the cost. Colonial hands that stole and bled. Genocide's shadow where ancestors tread. Their hands built fire, their words broke chains. They bore the wounds, they spoke the names. They stood when silence crushed the meek. They fought so we could dare to speak. Ordained to obtain true freedom’s light, determined to dream turns to sight. Too long a fallacy forged in greed, a false success that lets egos feed. Justice is built on many hands, protest in streets where courage stands. Policy drafted, systems redesigned, breaking the cycle long enshrined. This time to care, to heal the pain, to hold each other through the rain. For rest is fuel, and love is might. Both beating hearts still poised to fight. We rise and remember. Honor the past. Our struggles united, bound to last. From different moons, yet one refrain, resistance burning through the pain. So breathe now, deep and strong. Let the rhythm push us on. Step by step, breath by breath, we rise, we carry defying death. The journey stretches, but we endure, voices rising, hearts made sure. Bound by history, lit by grace, standing tall in sacred space. 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Moore moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda, as amended, with amendments to the minutes as stated during the Page 16 of 74 7/14/25 -4- DRAFT Study Session, adding the Permitted Districts For Commercial Animal Establishments discussion, and moving the Strategic Planning Update And Reporting to the July 28 regular session, to the Consent Agenda, and the following consent items were approved: 6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. June 23, 2025 – Study Session 2. June 23, 2025 – Regular Session 6b. LICENSES AMUSEMENT DEVICES Empire Foods 1200 Shingle Creek Crossing Sun Foods 6350 Brooklyn Boulevard MECHANICAL Endless Quality and Comfort 1010 Newton Avenue N, Minneapolis 55411 Marsh Heating & A/C 6248 Lakeland Avenue N, Brooklyn Park 55428 Mespo Heating & Cooling Inc. 1904 Glenwood Avenue N, Minneapolis 55443 Owens Companies, Inc. 500 West 92nd Street, Bloomington 55420 PB Services LLC 9410 Bataan Street NE, Blaine 55449 Perfection Heating & Air 1770 Gervais Avenue, Maplewood 55109 Veteran Mechanical 3751 200th Street E, Prior Lake 55372 RENTAL INITIAL (TYPE III – one-year license) 5116 Ewing Avenue N J Sedlezky & A Faschingbauer INITIAL (TYPE I – three-year license) 7145 Unity Avenue N Rodolfo Arturo Trijillo RENEWAL (TYPE IV – 6-month license) Page 17 of 74 7/14/25 -5- DRAFT 6740 Grimes Place Victoria Townhouses 1 5306 Knox Avenue N Antonio Vizcarra-moreno 5556 Emerson Avenue N Thomas D Belting RENEWAL (TYPE III – one-year license) 4207 Lakeside Ave N, #236 Judith C Spanberger RENEWAL (TYPE II – two-year license) 6125 Lilac Drive N Lanel Crossings Ltd Ptnrshp RENEWAL (TYPE I – three-year license) 5401 63rd Avenue N Ayodeji Gbayisomore 4214 Lakeside Avenue J E Shoultz & G R Shoultz 4291 Lakeside Avenue N, #111 Yohannes Seyoum 4207 Lakeside Avenue N, #320 H Pollinger & L Pollinger Tr 1325 68th La N Roth Wagner 2 Llc 2006 55th Avenue N Pedram Nastaean 3519 53rd Place N Jewel Johnson 3906 61st Avenue N Zinfandel Properties LLC 3912 58th Avenue N Prosperous Property LLC 4707 Eleanor La Cosco Property 4 Llc 5260 Twin Lake Boulevard E HERON VERDE LLC 5418 70th Cir Jazz Properties MN LLC 5827 Ewing Avenue N J C Quito-villa Et Al 6336 Fremont Avenue N Xample Renovations Llc 6628 Camden Dr Wells Bovard 7085 Unity Avenue N I-chang Wen & Yanhua Sun 7024 Oliver Circle JULIANA KOE Page 18 of 74 7/14/25 -6- DRAFT SIGNHANGER BMS Signs & Printing 3125 84th Lane NE, Blaine 55421 6c. RESOLUTION 2025-66 ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2023-10, I694/DUPONT AVE WATER MAIN CROSSING REPLACEMENT PROJECT 7. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS 7a. MINNESOTA RECREATION AND PARKS ASSOCIATION AWARDS OF EXCELLENCE PRESENTATION Dr. Edwards explained that there are two awards, a statewide award with two distinguished programs within Brooklyn Center that were recognized. Dr. Edwards introduced Carrie Anderson from the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association (MRPA) Awards Committee to present the awards. Dr. Edwards said he would like to honor Charles Gray, the Recreation Coordinator for the local food purchase, and Patrick Reese, the Recreation Manager for Yoga For All. After the awards are presented, Dr. Edwards asked if a picture could be taken of the Council, Ms. Anderson, and City Staff. Ms. Anderson stated she was there to present two awards to the City of Brooklyn Center for the 2024 Award of Excellence Program. Ms. Anderson gave a brief overview of MRPA and said it was formed in 1937 to foster the growth and development of the Parks and Recreation profession throughout the state of Minnesota. Currently, there are around 850 professional corporate board commission student and retiree members throughout the state. Members of the MRPA come from municipal, county, state, district, commercial, and private agencies. The award of Excellence is an annual program of the MRPA that was solely created to recognize agencies and their Staff and was either implemented in 2024 or received substantial revisions in 2024. The MRPA members may nominate a project for an Award of Excellence in seven different categories. Nominations are received, reviewed, evaluated, and scored by Awards Committee members; only the top- scoring nominations are selected to receive an Award of Excellence. Ms. Anderson presented an Excellence Award in the category of Sponsorship and Partnership for the project called Harvest For All, which is a local food purchase assistance program that distributes produce. This program partnered with a local food purchase assistance grant through Hennepin County to address nutrition and food insecurities in Brooklyn Center by distributing locally grown vegetables from Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) Farmers to community members at no cost. The program aimed to help local farmers by purchasing directly from them. The program also aimed at accessibility, ensuring distribution occurred at flexible times and locations to accommodate varying schedules and transportation limitations within the community. For its ability to improve health outcomes, foster community resilience, and serve as a model of equity and sustainability, this program is designated as an MRPA Award of Excellence recipient. Page 19 of 74 7/14/25 -7- DRAFT Ms. Anderson said the next award is also in the category of Sponsorship and Partnership for the project called Yoga For All. This program set out to remove barriers to make yoga more accessible for the Brooklyn Center community. Partnering with the Brooklyn Center Community Center, The Yoga Sanctuary, and CAPI USA, the initiative recruited and trained local instructors by making training accessible and relevant to immigrants and BIPOC community members. With CAPI USA's partnership and grant funding, the classes could remain free, reducing barriers. Yoga For All provides a connection to mental and physical health and community connection while providing opportunities to those who historically did not have access to yoga. Ms. Anderson stated on behalf of the MRPA Award Committee that it is her pleasure to present two awards to the City of Brooklyn Center for its winning projects, Harvest For All and Yoga For All. Ms. Anderson stated the MRPA Award Committee would also like to recognize Charlie Gray and Patrick Reese, who nominated these projects for the Award of Excellence. Ms. Anderson congratulated Brooklyn Center on their awards. Mayor Graves stated that the City Staff did an excellent job, congratulated them on the awards, and noted how beneficial both programs are to the community. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to accept the presentation of the Minnesota Recreation and Parks Association Award of Excellence. Motion passed unanimously. 7b. PROCLAMATION ACKNOWLEDGING AND PROCLAIMING JULY AS “PARK AND RECREATION MONTH” Mayor Graves read in full a Proclamation recognizing July 2025 as Park and Recreation Month. Councilmember Moore moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to adopt a PROCLAMATION Recognizing July 2025 as Park and Recreation Month. Motion passed unanimously. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS Mayor Graves stated they would prepare to go into closed session after the City Attorney provides a brief factual basis. Mayor Graves will entertain a motion to close this portion of the meeting for the discussion, litigation, and potential settlement options. City Attorney Siobhan Tolar stated that the open meeting law allows City Councils to enter into closed sessions for attorney-client privileged meetings. The City has received notice of a court filing at the Minnesota Court of Appeals by BC Seva LLC, Suburban Studio, and Care Chexx. Ms. Tolar stated that, for brevity, they should be addressed as Suburban Studios. Suburban Studios' appeal alleges that the City's decision to revoke Suburban Studios' Hospitality Accommodation License was arbitrary and capricious and not based on substantial evidence. Page 20 of 74 7/14/25 -8- DRAFT Suburban Studios also submitted a proposal for resolution to the City late last week. Ms. Tolar continued that the City takes these actions seriously and that the situation requires a candid and open discussion between the City Council and the City Attorney without the presence of potential litigants. For those reasons, the purpose is served by the attorney-client privilege against those served, whereas the open meeting law dictates the need for absolute confidentiality. The closed session will be limited to the scope of the litigation and the potential resolution. Ms. Tolar noted that the Council needed to make a motion to go into closed session, as stated on the agenda. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Moore seconded to go into closed session pursuant to Minnesota statute Section 13D.05, subdivision 3B for an attorney-client protected discussion with the City’s Attorney regarding litigation and potential settlement options from BC Seva LLC, Suburban Studios regarding Hospitality Accommodation License Revocation. Motion passed unanimously. CLOSED SESSION - PURSUANT TO M.S. 13D, SUBD. 3.C.3. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Moore seconded to reopen the meeting Motion passed unanimously. 8a. CONSIDERATION OF SUBURBAN STUDIOS STAY OF HOSPITALITY ACCOMMODATION LICENSE REVOCATION REQUEST PURSUANT TO MINN. R. CIV. APP. P. 108.02 AND 115.03. Mayor Graves explained that the Council had gone into a closed session to discuss a possible settlement with Suburban Studios but would now be discussing this agenda item. This item is on the agenda to consider requests from Suburban Studios to stay Revocation of their Hospitality Accommodation License. Mayor Graves stated that at this time, City Staff or the City Attorney will make remarks related to the request for a stay of Revocation. Dr. Edwards introduced City Attorney Siobhan Tolar to present this item. Ms. Tolar stated that right now, the Council is considering Suburban Studios' stay of Hospitality Accommodation License Revocation request. Ms. Tolar continued by providing some background on the situation. On June 23, 2025, the City Council revoked the Hospitality Accommodation License for BC Seva, LLC, dba Suburban Studios, based on violations of Sections 23-2402(C) and 23-2413(A)(6) of the Brooklyn Center Hospitality Accommodation Ordinance. License revocation was delayed 21 days to allow for current occupants of the facility to vacate the premises. Revocation is set to become effective July 14, 2025. On July 2, 2025, Suburban Studios requested a Stay of Revocation pursuant to Minnesota Rules of Appellate Procedures Rules 115.03 Subd. 2(b) and 108.02. The request specifics were that the City's Revocation of the hotel license by stayed and not enforced in its entirety pending a final judicial determination regarding the legality Page 21 of 74 7/14/25 -9- DRAFT of the Revocation, or that the City's Revocation of the hotel license be stayed and not enforced for all hotel services exclusive of recuperative care, which will remain in effect pending a final judicial determination regarding the legality of the Revocation, and no bond or security as the rules require. An additional request was submitted that if the City decides to deny stay of Revocation, Suburban Studios would like a week extension for the effective date of Revocation, the new effective date would be July 21, 2025. Ms. Tolar explained the Council's actions for either denying the stay of revocation request or granting a stay of Revocation. She explained the legal standard for licensing decisions and noted, "When local governmental units exercise their licensing authority, they must determine whether continued operations will be ‘detrimental to the public good.’” She noted that in addition, “when determining whether or not to grant a stay pending appeal, the governmental unit must balance the appealing party’s interest (in this case, Suburban Studios interest) in preserving the status quo, so that effective relief will be available if the appeal succeeds, against the interests of the public (the City) or the prevailing party in enforcing the decision and ensuring that they remain ‘secure in victory’ while the appeal is pending.” Ms. Tolar explained that these quotes are from case laws notated in the slide presented to the Council. Ms. Tolar explained the Staff recommendation is for Council to grant Stay of Revocation exclusive of any Recuperative Care operations, with no bond, for the following reasons: if the City were to allow Suburban Studios to continue operations solely as a Hospitality Accommodation without the Recuperative Care Facility/Operations, the City would be in fundamentally the same position it was prior to the change in use of the establishment. It serves the City's purpose of maintaining functional hotels within its borders. Supports adherence to the City's ordinances (specifically the Hospitality Accommodation Ordinance). Waiver of the bond or other security would result in minimal financial loss to the City if the Revocation were to take effect. Suburban Studios could lose revenue for the duration of time it took to conclude the appeal. Ms. Tolar stated that Staff also recommends a grant of Stay of Revocation exclusive of Recuperative Care with the following conditions: Suburban Studios et al. (BC Seva, LLC, Care Chexx) must continue to pay lodging taxes and all utilities, and abide by all City, state, and federal laws. Suburban Studios must abide by their level 1 Hospitality License requirements and any other requirements outlined in Section 23-2400 of the Brooklyn Center City Code, including 23-2402(C) defining hospitality accommodations as “facilities or places offering six or more lodging units to guests for periods of less than 30 days.” Ms. Tolar noted that Staff wanted it to be reiterated that all stays must be less than 30 days. Suburban Studios must submit to unannounced inspections of the entire premises at the City’s discretion. The Stay of Revocation and terms/conditions must be reduced to writing and filed with the Court. Any violation of the agreement on the part of Suburban Studios will result in an automatic and immediate revocation of the Hospitality License. Upon that occurrence, the City will initiate closure of the building, and all guests must immediately vacate the premises. Ms. Tolar noted the requested Council action with the motion language on the slide presented to the Council, but she stated that before making the motion, Suburban Studios wanted to speak to Page 22 of 74 7/14/25 -10- DRAFT the Council. She noted that the Council can come back to the requested Council action, whether it was to stay the revocation request or deny the revocation request. Mayor Graves thanked Ms. Tolar for the presentation and asked if Suburban Studios or their legal counsel wanted to make a statement to the Council. Attorney Catherine Cochran spoke on behalf of her clients, BC Seva LLC, and Care Chexx, the landowner and the care provider. Ms. Cochran stated that the Revocation of the Hospitality License goes into effect today, July 14, 2025, and Ms. Cochran's office sent a letter on July 2, requesting that the Revocation be stayed during the pendency of the case, pending at the Court of appeals. She stated she would not go over all the points in the letter sent on July 2, but that the Council and City Staff already had a good summary and did not want to waste the Council's time. Ms. Cochran wanted to cover a few points that have happened since that letter was sent on July 2. First, as a direct result of the Revocation, the Department of Human Services (DHS) has informed Care Chexx that it is no longer on active status because DHS “received notice from a local government that the facility is not eligible to provide” Recuperative Care services at the facility. If the stay is granted, DHS has indicated it will reinstate Care Chexx as a provider of Recuperative Care services. If Care Chexx is unable to operate for an extended period of time, for example, a period of six months, it will turn away approximately 180 persons needing Recuperative Care services. Ms. Cochran noted that some of those persons might not have another place to go, due to limited availability of other providers in the area; therefore, those persons may not receive care at all. Ms. Cochran also noted that the economic impact of denying a Stay of Revocation would be severe for both of her clients. This would result in dozens of hotel staff losing their jobs, and may result in the permanent closure of the hotel operations. Care Chexx has already furloughed over 30 employees as of today’s date. Ms. Cochran stated that since she has already requested a stay for her clients, her request now is for the Council to weigh the appealing party’s interest against the public interest and that of the City. She explained that the balance of interest was heavily in favor of granting her request for a stay, as it would benefit not only her clients but also the communities that her clients both serve. Ms. Cochran stated that for the reasons she stated, she would like to request the Council vote to stay the Revocation of the Hospitality License in full during the pendency of the appeal. She thanked the Council for their time. Mayor Graves asked if the Council had any follow-up questions for Ms. Cochran. Councilmember Moore asked Dr. Edwards about the Staff's recommendation to stay the Revocation of the Hospitality Accommodation License and if that would mean Suburban Studios would not be able to continue to be a Recuperative Care facility because it is against Brooklyn Center's zoning. Dr. Edwards confirmed that is correct. Councilmember Moore asked if the Council made a motion to stay the Revocation; no matter what Ms. Cochran said about DHS, it was not affected by the Council’s decision. Ms. Tolar stated she would like to help frame the decision for the Council. Ms. Tolar stated that the Council is hearing Suburban Studios' requests, but the Council is not obligated to grant those Page 23 of 74 7/14/25 -11- DRAFT requests. The Council is considering, from a City Staff standpoint, the reinstatement of the Hospitality Accommodation license exclusive of Recuperative Care based on the licensing violation. The Council thanked Ms. Tolar for the clarification. Mayor Graves asked if any other Councilmembers had questions. Councilmember Moore moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to Stay the Suburban Studios Hospitality Accommodation License Revocation as it pertains to the operation of a Hospitality Accommodation exclusively without a security bond pending appeal of the license revocation and the underlying zoning determination, and pending Suburban Studios strict compliance with the following terms of the Stay of License Revocation: 1. BC Seva LLC, Suburban Studios, Care Chexx or any other company may not operate a Recuperative Care facility or provide Recuperative Care as defined in Minnesota statutes 256B.0701, or provide anything resembling care services at 270101 Freeway Boulevard. 2. Suburban Studios et al. must continue to pay lodging taxes and all utilities and abide by all City, state, and federal laws. 3. Suburban Studios et al. must abide by their level one Hospitality License requirements and any other requirements outlined in section 23-2400 of the Brooklyn Center City Code, including 23-2402(C) defining Hospitality Accommodations as facilities or places offering six or more lodging units to guests for periods of less than 30 days. 4. Suburban Studios et al. must submit to unannounced inspections of the entire premises at the City's discretion. 5. The Stay of Revocation and terms and conditions there too must be reduced to writing, signed by the parties, and filed with the Court. Any violation of the agreement on the part of Suburban Studios et al. will result in automatic and immediate Revocation of the Hospitality and Accommodation license. At that time, the City will initiate closure of the building, and all guests must immediately vacate the premises. Motion passed unanimously. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS 10a. ORDINANCE 2025-07 ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 23-2750 IN THE BROOKLYN CENTER CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES TO REGULATE TEMPORARY CANNABIS EVENTS (FIRST READING) Dr. Edwards introduced City Clerk Shannon Pettit, supported by City Attorney Siobhan Tolar, to present this item to the Council. Ms. Pettit stated this was the first reading of the ordinance amendment to Chapter 23-2750 of the City code to regulate the temporary cannabis events. Ms. Pettit shared some background on the ordinance amendment. The state established the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) to create Page 24 of 74 7/14/25 -12- DRAFT statutes and licensing processes. The OCM released the Local Guide for Adult-Use Cannabis in August 2024 and held the Licensing Lottery on June 5 for social equity and general applicants. City Council approved the Cannabis Business Licensing Ordinance, effective June 7, 2025. City Staff continues working on ordinance creation and changes to comply with OCM statutes and licensing processes. City Staff and the City Attorney worked together to update the ordinance to comply with all OCM standards and regulations while keeping the requirements and language similar to that of the Special Event permits and requirements. Ms. Pettit discussed the licensing parameters, which include the following: any person or organization desiring to hold a Temporary Cannabis Event in the City of Brooklyn Center must apply for a permit. The application must be filed a minimum of 45 days prior to the event. Events with an anticipated attendance of 1,000 people or more must apply a minimum of 90 days prior to the event. One week prior to the event, the organizer must submit proof of state licensure. The organizer must provide proof of liability insurance and automobile insurance (if required). This permitting process is similar to the current special events permit requirements. Ms. Pettit continued that the licensing parameters also include required documentation in the form of an application/form, diagram of the event site, security and emergency plan, parking and traffic plan, special services (if any), and sound amplification (if any). Ms. Pettit outlined the licensing regulations, which state that the event may not be held on City- owned property or school property. If held outdoors, it may not be held on property within 500 feet of a residential property or treatment facility (measurements to be made from the entrance of each building or tenancy). The event may not be held at any single location more than four times in a calendar year, or for more than three consecutive days. Events can only be held between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. On-site consumption of edible cannabinoid products and lower- potency hemp products is permitted; however, on-site consumption of alcohol or tobacco is not permitted pursuant to Minnesota statute section 342.40, Sub. 8(d). The applicant must provide a 10-day notice to residents within 500 feet of the event. Ms. Pettit noted the Cannabis Temporary Event Permit Application fee is $100.00 with enforcement and violation fees that mirror those which were approved for the Cannabis Retail Registration Fines as follows; the first violation constitutes a $1,000 penalty, second violation constitutes a $1,250 penalty, the third violation constitutes a $1,500 penalty, and the fourth violation constitutes a $2,000 penalty. Ms. Pettit asked the Council if they had any questions. Mayor Graves asked if the violation is on par with the typical violation strikes one, two, and three. Ms. Pettit stated that it does, and mimics what was approved for the retail registration fees. Councilmember Moore stated that it was safe to say that cannabis has been heavily regulated in the state, even though it was approved, including increasing the taxes, which will probably prohibit people from accessing it, since no one will be able to afford it. She asked about the Minnesota statute on on-site consumption of alcohol and tobacco, and if that meant someone could have a cannabis pop-up party but could not smoke a cigarette or have a beer at the same event. Page 25 of 74 7/14/25 -13- DRAFT Ms. Pettit stated that this regulation is specifically talking about edible cannabis. If the cannabis produces any type of odor, it would not be allowed. Councilmember Moore asked to back up and asked if the entire event was for edibles only. Ms. Pettit explained that if the event is indoors, it would be for cannabis edibles only. If the event is outdoors on City property, smoking is not allowed. Councilmember Moore asked if these events allowed smoking marijuana. Ms. Pettit shook her head no. Councilmember Moore stated the regulations were not clear on the events. Ms. Tolar explained that at a cannabis event held indoors, there is no smoking allowed. Councilmember Moore concurred because smoking of any kind is not allowed indoors. Ms. Tolar continued that a cannabis event can not happen on City property. If the cannabis event was on private property, the permit would need to indicate whether or not smoking would be allowed. Councilmember Moore asked if smoking would be allowed then, as long as the applicant followed the permit process and was not on City property or indoors. Ms. Tolar stated she would have to look up the statutes and ordinances and does not want to say on the record that Councilmember Moore is correct, but she does not think that it is expressly prohibited on private property. Councilmember Moore asked about the 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. time frame and the reason the event would have to end at 10:00 p.m. Ms. Pettit stated that the time frame follows sound regulations. Councilmember Moore responded that it would be treated like a party, and understood why there would be a time frame. Councilmember Jerzak asked if these regulations were based on a model like the League of Minnesota Cities and if these regulations follow what other cities are doing. Ms. Pettit stated that City Staff and the City Attorney looked at what other surrounding cities are doing, as well as the League of Minnesota Cities and the OCM, and it varies. Many of the cities are not allowing temporary cannabis events or are allowing them with little to no regulation. City Staff approached it in a way to be prepared ahead of time, for cannabis events to happen. Ms. Tolar concurred that there is a broad range of how cannabis events are being regulated across the state. The state statutes also outline some requirements for temporary cannabis events, so City Staff tried to stay in line with what the state requires and what the City requires for special events, as well as the City's stance on cannabis. Mayor Graves asked if there were any more questions. Councilmember Moore said her only comment was that she dissents from having any regulations, but she knows that there has to be some regulation because cannabis, in general, has already been over-regulated by the state. Councilmember Moore moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded to approve an ordinance establishing Chapter 23-2750 to regulate Temporary Cannabis Events. Page 26 of 74 7/14/25 -14- DRAFT Motion passed unanimously. Ms. Tolar asked if the Council could revisit item nine, the Hospitality Accommodation License Revocation request, and stated she thinks the Council forgot to adopt the resolution as well. Councilmember Jerzak moved and Mayor Graves seconded to reconsider the consideration of the Suburban Studios Stay of Hospitality Accommodation License Revocation request. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Jerzak moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2025 City Council, City of Brooklyn Center Resolution staying the Revocation of the Hospitality Accommodation License for BC Seva LLC, doing business as Suburban Studios. Motion passed unanimously. 11. COUNCIL REPORT 12. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Jerzak seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 8:14 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Page 27 of 74 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 7/28/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Approval of Licenses Requested Council Action: The following businesses/persons have applied for City licenses as noted. Each business/person has fulfilled the requirements of the City Ordinance governing respective licenses, submitted appropriate applications, and paid proper fees. Applicants for rental dwelling licenses are in compliance with Chapter 12 of the City Code of Ordinances unless comments are noted below the property address on the attached rental report. Amusement Devices New King Buffet 5927 John Martin Dr. Background: Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. For Council Approval 7.28.25 FOR COUNCIL 7.1 TO 7.15 2. Rental Criteria Page 28 of 74 Location Address License Subtype Renewal/Initial Owner Property Code Violations License Type Police CFS* Final License Type** Previous License Type*** Consecutive Type IV's 5342 70th Cir Single Initial Pai Lor 0 Type I N/A Type II N/A N/A 5901 Aldrich Ave N Single Initial EDWIN CRUZ GUERRERO 5 Type II N/A Type II N/A N/A 5207 Xerxes Ave N Multiple Family 1 Bldg 12 Units Renewal Djwb Inc 5 = 0.42 per unit Type I 8/8/2024 Disturbance Type I Type I N/A 5415 69th Ave N Multiple Family 1 Bldg 63 Units Renewal Phs Maranatha Inc 54 = 0.86 per unit Type II 0 Type II Type II N/A 5235 Drew Ave N Two Family Renewal Jay Nelson Battenberg 0 Type I 0 Type I Type I N/A 3121 Lawrence Rd Single Renewal Empire Care Systems Did not meet requirements 0 Type I 0 Type IV Type IV 3 5818 Emerson Ave N Single Renewal New Prospect Holdings Did not meet requirements 1 Type I 0 Type IV Type IV 3 1606 71st Ave N Single Renewal G A Lang & V L Lang Rev Trst Met Requirements 1 Type I 0 Type I Type III N/A 3018 Ohenry Rd Single Renewal Godiva Properties Llc 4 Type II 0 Type II Type I N/A 6000 Bryant Ave N Single Renewal Rto Investments Llc Did not meet requirements 2 Type I 0 Type III Type III N/A 6407 Orchard Ave N Single Renewal Hpa Borrower 2018-1 Ms Llc Met Requirements 1 Type I 0 Type I Type III N/A 6436 Dupont Ave N Single Renewal AA Homes LLC 1 Type I 0 Type I Type II N/A 7025 Drew Ave N Single Renewal SFR BORROWER 2022-1 LLC Met Requirements 5 Type II 0 Type II Type III N/A *CFS = Calls for service for renewal licenses only (Initial licenses are not applicable to CFS and will be listed as N/A) **License type being issued ***Initial licenses will not show a previous Type I = 3 year, Type II = 2 year, Type III = 1 year, Type IV = 6 months All properties are current on City utilties and taxes Rental Licenses for Council Approval 7.28.25 Page 29 of 74 Page 2 of 2 b.Police Service Calls. Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12-911, and events categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, auto theft and arson. Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the victim and suspect are “Family or household members” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (b) and where there is a report of “Domestic Abuse” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (a). License Category Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Service & Part I Crimes (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category Impact 1-2 0-1 3-4 units 0-0.25 5 or more units 0-0.35 Decrease 1 Category 1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 3-4 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 Categories 1-2 Greater than 3 3-4 units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria License Category (Based on Property Code Only) Number of Units Property Code Violations per Inspected Unit Type I – 3 Year 1-2 units 0-2 3+ units 0-0.75 Type II – 2 Year 1-2 units Greater than 2 but not more than 5 3+ units Greater than 0.75 but not more than 1.5 Type III – 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 5 but not more than 9 3+ units Greater than 1.5 but not more than 3 Type IV – 6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 9 3+ units Greater than 3 Page 30 of 74 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT AND AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR AMANI CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is a participant in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (“LCA”) Local Housing Incentives Program for 2025 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is therefore eligible to apply for Predevelopment grant funds Livable Communities Demonstration Account ("LCDA"); and WHEREAS, the City has identified proposed projects within the City that meet LCDA purposes and criteria and is consistent with and promotes the purposes of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act and the policies of the Metropolitan Council’s adopted metropolitan development guide; and WHEREAS, the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to adequately manage an LCDA grant and; WHEREAS, the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement; and WHEREAS, the City acknowledges LCDA grants are intended to fund projects or project components that can serve as models, examples or prototypes for LCDA development or redevelopment elsewhere in the Region, and therefore represents that the proposed project or key components of the proposed project can be replicated in other metropolitan-area communities; and WHEREAS, the City acknowledges Met Council Predevelopment grants from the Livable Communities Demonstration Account are intended to fund projects through the predevelopment phase of construction. WHERES, only a limited amount of grant funding is available through the Metropolitan Council’s Livable Communities Demonstration Account LCDA initiative during each funding cycle and the Metropolitan Council has determined it is appropriate to allocate those scarce grant funds only to eligible projects that would not occur without the availability of grant funding. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, after appropriate examination and due consideration, the governing body of the City: 1.Finds that it is in the best interests of the City’s development goals and priorities for the following proposed Predevelopment projects to occur at this particular site at this time: Page 31 of 74 Amani Construction & Development - 54XX Block of Brooklyn Blvd 2. Finds that that LCDA Project component(s) for which Livable Communities LCDA is sought: a.Will not occur solely through private or other public investment within the reasonable foreseeable future; and b.Will occur within the term of the grant award (three years for Development grants,) only if Livable Communities LCDA funding is made available for this project at this time. 3. Authorizes the City Manager to submit on behalf of the City an application for Metropolitan Council Livable Communities LCDA grant funds a for the project components identified in the application, and to execute such agreements as may be necessary to implement the Project on behalf of the City. July 28, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 2 Page 32 of 74 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 1/27/2025 TO: Council/EDA Work Session FROM: Ian Alexander, Economic Development Manager, Amy Loegering, Associate Planner THROUGH: Jesse Anderson, Community Development Director BY: Amy Loegering, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Concept Review: 5400 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard (Townhouse Development) Requested Council Action: Staff request that the City Council review a development concept, provide comments, ask questions and indicate whether the City would be open to the project. Background: The concept review process is an opportunity for the City Council to review a development concept prior to a formal proposal from an applicant, and provide comments, ask questions, and indicate whether the City would be open to the project. The concept review process is helpful for projects that would involve EDA-owned land or public subsidy, as it provides insight to City staff and the applicant regarding the City Council’s level of interest, and any specific concerns related to a project. A concept review is considered advisory and is non-binding to the City and the applicant. No formal action can be taken at a work session, and the Council is not being asked to vote on the proposal; however, as the Subject Property is owned by the City’s Economic Development Authority (“EDA”), City staff and the applicant seek feedback and direction to inform any next steps. If the applicant chooses to submit a formal application to the City to proceed, it would be subject to the full City review process, as with any other development application. The Subject Property is comprised of three lots located south of 55th Avenue North and formerly addressed as 5415, 5407, and 5401 Brooklyn Boulevard. These lots were re- platted in 2019 as an approximately 1.13-acre site, and guided for a medium-density residential use under the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan and zoning map. Another site (including 5455 and 5459 Brooklyn Boulevard) and located north of 55th Avenue North, which was also under City ownership and included in the 2019 re-plat, was conveyed to Robbinsdale School District in 2023 as the site was deemed unbuildable and already contained some of the Northport Elementary's stormwater ponding. Developer Information: The Developer, Amani Construction & Development, LLC is a locally owned, woman and BIPOC-led residential development and construction firm with over a decade of experience in building affordable and market-rate single-family housing. The Developer’s work includes partnerships in the Minneapolis Homes program and the St. Page 2 of 6Page 33 of 74 Paul Inspiring Communities program, which has allowed the Developer to become adept at navigating city processes and coordinating resources to create high-quality, affordable homes. As the General Contractor on its own projects, the Developer leads a dedicated team focused on expanding affordable housing and addressing homeownership disparities. They note they have successfully developed multiple new construction homes through the Minneapolis Homes program, primarily serving households within the 60-115% Area Median Income (AMI) range and in historically underserved communities. By designing and constructing accessible, affordable units, the Developer is committed to making homeownership a reality for a more diverse population, supporting its mission to reduce inequities in housing. Project Concept: Amani Construction & Development, LLC (the “Developer” or “Applicant”) has submitted a proposal to purchase the Subject Property to construct an 11-unit townhouse development. As is currently proposed, the homes would provide three (3) for four (4) bedrooms per unit, and the the homes' exteriors would be a mix of LP siding and brick. Each townhouse would feature a rear load two-car garage. The homes would be designed to be 20% more energy efficient than homes built to standard codes, reducing greenhouse gas emissions by up to 80% and feature high performance windows, advanced insulation, and smart home technology for efficient energy management and enhanced convenience. Each unit will have a front yard and a rear balcony or deck. The development also features 15 visitor parking stalls, a small playground, and shared green space. The marketing plan currently calls for these townhomes to be owner- occupied and targeted for households earning 60-80% of the Area Median Income. Brooklyn Center would benefit from the addition of denser, market rate housing alternatives. Currently, Brooklyn Center’s housing mix relies primarily on single-family detached homes and large-scale rental housing complexes. Single family attached homes provide a needed alternative, filling the gap between rental and single family detached home options. Denser, smaller scale housing development efficiently utilizing infill opportunities are a City need, increasing the revenue base, and visual appeal along one of the City’s primary corridors. In addition, this type of housing furthers the City Council's Strategic Priority of strengthening and diversifying business development and housing. 5401, 5407 and 5415 Brooklyn Boulevard: The Subject Property is a combined, approximately 1.13-acre parcel, and comprised of 5401, 5407 and 5415 Brooklyn Boulevard. These properties were acquired by the City around 2016 and 2017 as part of the Phase I Brooklyn Boulevard project. The aforementioned realignment of the Brooklyn Boulevard frontage road ultimately incorporated certain intersection improvements at 55th Avenue North, including additional queuing for those vehicles exiting Northport Elementary (5421 Brooklyn Boulevard), which is located adjacent to the Subject Property. Page 3 of 6Page 34 of 74 Per EDA Resolution No. 2016-15, it appears these properties were acquired for $825,000 total; however, $560,000 was proposed to be paid from the Capital Improvement Program, with the remaining funded by the Tax Increment District 3 Housing Fund (TIF #3). Historically, final right-of-way acquisition as part of the Phase I and Phase II Brooklyn Boulevard project were a 50/50 cost share between the City and Hennepin County. Although the City was able to pull demolition permits for all three properties in 2017, City staff is still researching any final costs associated with the demolition. The Subject Property is approximately 1.13 acres and is zoned Medium Density Residential (M3) and allows for Developer’s proposed use and density range. Development Agreement: The EDA has not yet begun negotiations with Developer regarding the specific terms of a development agreement. The EDA anticipates that any future development agreement will require an earnest money payment to the EDA of not less than $10,000, and will include a reverter clause allowing EDA to re-enter and re-possess the property in the event the Developer does not substantially complete improvements within the terms of the development agreement. Next Steps: If the Council wishes to proceed, the EDA and Developer will continue discussions regarding the terms of a development agreement and will present the development agreement for consideration at a future meeting. The Developer will conduct its due diligence on the Subject Property and prepare a Planning Commission application, with full architectural and civil plan sets. This application would go through full review with City staff, the Planning Commission, and City Council. Should a recommendation for approval of the project be granted, City staff would negotiate a purchase agreement for the Subject Property, which would go to the City EDA for consideration, and as part of a public hearing. Budget Issues: Budget Issues: The Subject Property was acquired by the City of Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority between approximately 2016 and 2017. Negotiations regarding the Developer’s proposed purchase price are ongoing. The Developer is not seeking a public subsidy as part of its proposal at this time. Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: Page 4 of 6Page 35 of 74 ATTACHMENTS: 1. 5401 Brooklyn Blvd -SITE PLAN 111124 Page 5 of 6Page 36 of 74 NEW ZONING: R3 -MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIALBROOKLYN BLVD FRONTAGE RD5 5 T H A V E N 255.7 5 9 .3 2 0 4 . 3 8 1 1 5 . 3 5 5 6 . 9 1 R = 3 3 0R=2702 4 4 . 9 6 SIDE SETBACK 10 ' - 0 " SIDE SETBACK 10' - 0" F R O N T S E T B A C K35' - 0 " S E C O N D A R Y F R O N T S E T B A C K 1 5 ' - 0 " POND 5' - 0 " 30 4 . 4 2 5' - 0" 4 0 ' T Y P I C A L D E P T H T Y P I C A L , 1 1 U N I T S 2 0 ' - 0 " CENTER 8'X5' BALCONY @MAIN FLOOR ABOVE GARAGE DOOR, TYP 2 0 ' - 0 " 2 2 ' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 " AREA FOR COMMON SPACE/AMENITY ( 1 5 ) G U E S T P A R K I N G A R E A 2 0 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 8 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 4 0 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 16' - 0 1/4" Project number Date Drawn by Checked by Revision Schedule CO P Y R I G H T 2 0 2 4 MINNEAPOLIS, MN tel: 612.470.2789 email: priyanka@rays-designs.com www.rays-designs.com CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, AS BUILT CONDITIONS (IF APPLY) AND SITE CONDITIONS, BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL OR DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBS MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO DESIGNER IMMEDIATLY. AS BUILT AND SITE CONDITIONS OFTEN HAVE UNIQUE CONDITIONS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED OR FORSEEN AT DESIGN COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR, SUBS AND DESIGNER WILL WORK TOGETHER TO REACH A SOLUTION IF ANY SITUATION MAY ARISE. TERMS: N O T F O R C O N S T R U C TIO N 11 / 8 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 2 5 : 2 9 P M C : \ U s e r s \ a d m i n \ O n e D r i v e - R a y s De s i g n s \ S h a r e d P U B L I C \ P r o j e c t s \ P r o j e c t _ 2 0 2 4 \ 2 4 7 5 1 - R S D - 5 4 0 1 B r o o k l y n B o u l e v a r d , B r o o k l y n c e n t e r - T ow n h o m e s \ 0 5 - R e v i t \ 5 4 0 1 B r o o k l y n B l v d - R e v i s i o n O P T3 . r v t A1-10 SITE PLAN 24751 TOWN HOMES BROOKLYN CENTER 11-08-2024 ST PRS 5401 Brooklyn Blvd, Minneapolis, MN 55429 SCHEMATIC DESIGN No. Description Date 3/64" = 1'-0"A1-10 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN Page 6 of 6Page 37 of 74 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 7/28/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Angela Holm, Director of Finance THROUGH: Reggie Edwards, City Manager BY: Angela Holm, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Resolution Adopting the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report of the City of Brooklyn Center for the Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2024 Requested Council Action: Motion to Accept a Resolution Adopting Annual Comprehensive Financial Report of the City of Brooklyn Center for the Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2024 Background: Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. ACFR 2024 Adoption Resolution Page 38 of 74 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-______ RESOLUTION ADOPTING ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2024 WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is required by State Statute and City Charter to annually produce financial statements for submission to the Office of the State Auditor by June 30 each year; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is required to provide an auditor’s opinion as to the representations in the annual financial statements; and WHEREAS, the financial statements have been audited by the independent CPA firm of Abdo as required; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Financial Commission received a presentation of the 2024 Financial Statement Audit from Abdo on July 21, 2025; and WHEREAS, Abdo opined that the general-purpose financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the City of Brooklyn Center as of December 31, 2024. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the City of Brooklyn Center for the calendar year ended December 31, 2024, and all supporting documentation, is hereby adopted as the official financial record for the 2024 fiscal year. July 28, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 39 of 74 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 7/28/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Garett Flesland, Chief of Police THROUGH: Reggie Edwards, City Manager BY: Garett Flesland, Chief of Police SUBJECT: 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update Requested Council Action: Accept the presentation. Background: This is simply a mid-year snapshot / update regarding Crime Reduction within the city. Budget Issues: Fiduciary responsibility is part of the city's approach to public safety and crime reduction. Inclusive Community Engagement: Community engagement is a part of the city's public safety and crime reduction strategy. Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: N/A Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2025 mid year crime reduction and strategy update (for presentation on 20250728) Page 40 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update Garett Flesland, Chief of PoliceBrooklyn Center City Council Meeting July 28, 2025 Page 41 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Agenda •Mid-Year Crime Trends (2025 vs. 2024) •Interdepartmental Collaboration •Hotspot Focus(es) •Camera Trailer Deployments •Proactive Policing Trends •Forecasts 2 Page 42 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Violent Crime Mid-Year Comparison (2025 to 2024)   Crime 2025 2024 1yr % Change   Homicide 0 0 N/A   Rape 18 16 12.5%   Robbery 26 43 -39.5%   Aggravated Assault 51 64 -20.3%     (Domestic Aggravated Assault) 31 30 3.3%   Total Violent Crime 95 123 -22.8% 3 Page 43 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Property Crime Mid-Year Comparison (2025 to 2024)   Crime 2025 2024 1yr % Change   Burglary 41 62 -33.9%   Larceny 337 308 9.4%   Auto Theft 71 123 -42.3%   Arson 0 2 -100.0%   Human Trafficking 1 1 0.0%   Total Property Crime 450 496 -9.3%   Total Part I Crime 545 619 -12.0% 4 Page 44 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Violent Crime Variation (1/1/2024-7/1/2024 vs 1/1/2025-7/1/2025) 5 Page 45 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Collaboration Across Departments •Crime Reduction Strategy (CRS) meetings now citywide (monthly) •Evolving communication between all departments within the city •Park and Rec Outreach Teams deployed in parks •Community Crisis Response Team meetings ongoing (monthly) •Hotel workgroup •Youth-focused pop-up events •Business engagement 6 Page 46 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Community Prevention, Intervention, Response and Recovery •Working in parks, schools and other high-activity areas •Focus on visibility, conflict resolution, and connection to services •Efforts in alignment with best practices of credible messengers, trauma-informed, and equity-focused •Ongoing Expanded Response Team pilot project 7 Page 47 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Hotspot Focus •Regular crime analyst analysis and reports inform hotspot focuses •Sector sergeants lead coordinated efforts, which have included: •Directed patrols •Camera trailer deployments •Overtime details •Community engagement opportunities •Three consistent primary focus areas: •Commercial Area •Brooklyn Blvd Corridor •Humboldt Ave 8 Page 48 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Camera Trailer(s) Deployment Patterns & Community Impact 9 Page 49 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Proactive Policing Trends •Emphasis on increased visibility throughout the community •Speed and curfew OT details •TZD traffic enforcement returned for first time since 2019–2020 •Proactive policing details outlined in March have begun 10 Page 50 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Tiger Team: Impact on Crime (1 week prior and 1 week after) Following their deployments:Violent Crime fell by 17% Part 1 crime fell by 7% Targeted call types fell by 11% 11 1 week prior (combined) Tiger Team weeks (combined) 1 week after (combined) % change TT week vs 1 week prior % change TT week vs 1 week after % change 1 week prior to 1 week after Violent Crime 6 4 5 -33%-20%-17% Serious Crime 36 29 34 -19%-15%-6% Total Part 1 Crime 42 33 39 -21%-15%-7% Group A Crime 80 85 77 6%10%-4% Targeted Call Types (disturbance, fight, juvenile problem, loud music/party, narcotics, suspicious activity, trespassing, unwant)180 192 161 7%19%-11% Page 51 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Tiger Team: Visibility and Proactive Policing (1 week prior and 1 week after) •The increased proactive policing appears to have had a disruptive effect on criminal activity •Tiger Team officers were highly proactive and productive •200% increase in the number of weapons recovered 12 1 week prior combined Tiger Team weeks combined 1 week after combined % change TT week vs 1 week prior % change TT week vs 1 week after % change 1 week prior to 1 week after Weapons Recovered 2 6 1 200%500%-50% Proactive activity (traffic stops & subject stops)174 489 202 181%142%16% Page 52 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Crime Comparison 6 4 5 36 29 34 Violent Crime Serious Crime 1 week prior (combined)Tiger Team weeks (combined)1 week after (combined)0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Violent Crime Serious Crime 13 Page 53 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Targeted Call Types Comparison 1 week prior (combined)Tiger Team weeks (combined)1 week after (combined) 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 180 192 161 14 Page 54 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Traffic Stops and Subject Stops (5/4/2025-5/11/2025 and 6/8/2025-6/14/2025) 15 Page 55 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Tiger Team Focus: Brooklyn Blvd Corridor Proactive Policing and Violent Crime Variation 16 Page 56 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Tiger Team Focus: Commercial Area Proactive Policing and Violent Crime Variation 17 Page 57 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Forecasted Prediction: Violent Crime Will Remain At Lower Levels 45474 45505 45536 45566 45597 45627 45658 45689 45717 45748 45778 45809 45839 45870 45901 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Total Violent Crime Forecast(Total Violent Crime) 18 Page 58 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Forecasted Prediction: Part 1 Crime Will Remain At Lower Levels 45474 45505 45536 45566 45597 45627 45658 45689 45717 45748 45778 45809 45839 45870 45901 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Total Part 1 Crime Forecast(Total Part 1 Crime) 19 Page 59 of 74 2025 Mid-Year Crime Reduction & Strategy Update July 28, 2025 Closing Thoughts •Visibility is up •Crime is down •Collaboration is working •Momentum is building 20 Page 60 of 74 Thank You Questions? Garett Flesland, Chief of PoliceBrooklyn Center City Council Meeting July 28, 2025 Page 61 of 74 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 7/28/2025 TO: City Council FROM: THROUGH: BY: Reggie Edwards, City Manager SUBJECT: Parliamentary Procedures and Robert's Rules of Order Review Requested Council Action: Receive a presentation of the city's policy regarding Parliamentary Procedure and Roberts Rules of Order. Background: In 2024-2025, the City Council desired to review its Parliamentary Procedure and Roberts Rules of Order. The Council will receive an overview from the City Attorney. Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Parliamentary Procedures 2. SECTION I, 1.3 Page 62 of 74 7/24/2025 1 Parliamentary Procedures Overview A presentation by City Attorney Siobhan Tolar Parliamentary Procedure & Roberts Rules of Order •Pursuant to City Charter 3.03, “The Council shall determine its own rules and order of business.” •The Council has adopted Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised for conducting meetings. •BC Parliamentary Procedure seems to be a modified version of Robert’s Rules of Order (“RR”) because practical use of RR is difficult and doesn’t always comply with MN Law •RR should be used as a guide if or when your rules of procedure don’t specify clear action 2 1 2 Page 63 of 74 7/24/2025 2 Purpose of Parliamentary Procedure To establish fair and orderly meetings and conventions To create a clear record of Council decisions To help members of the public follow the meeting 3 Guiding Principles of Robert’s Rules & Brooklyn Center Parliamentary Procedure Everyone has a right to participate in discussion if they wish, before anyone may speak a second time; Everyone has the right to know what is going on at all times; Only urgent matters may interrupt the speaker; Only one thing (motion) can be discussed at a time. 4 3 4 Page 64 of 74 7/24/2025 3 Brooklyn Center Parliamentary Procedures •BC Rules of Procedure has 14 Sections •Section 1.3 outlines BC Parliamentary Procedures 1. Points of Order 2. Parliamentary Appeal 3. Decorum and Order – Council Members 4. Decorum and Order – Employees 5. Decorum and Order – Public 6. Enforcement of Decorum 8. Conflict of Interest 9. Limitation of Debate 10. Dissents and Protests 11. Rules of Presiding Officer Final Unless Overruled Sections 1.10-1.14 discuss additional Parliamentary Procedure; 1.13 discusses motions 5 Role of Presiding Officer 6 •All members of Council have an equal voice and an equal vote •Section2.06oftheBrooklynCenterCity Charter designates the Mayor as Presiding Officer of the City Council and aMayorprotemwhoservesasMayorin the Mayor’s absence. •In the absence of the Mayor and Mayor pro tem, the Acting Mayor pro tem shall preside. The most senior Council Member shall be designated as Acting Mayor pro tem. 1.Determines all points of order, subject to the right of any Council Member to appeal to the Council 2.Recognizes speakers on the City Council and other speakers at the Council meeting 3.Calls speakers to order 4.May order the removal of any person who makes inappropriate remarks of who become boisterous while addressing the Council and bar that person from further audience with the Council 5.Directs and leads the meeting through the city council agenda 6.Maintains general order of the meeting 7.*Decides all questions of interpretation of the rules of procedure, points of order, and other questions of procedures requiring rulings. A ruling shall be final and binding for purposes of the matter under discussion 8.Revise order of business with the exception of noticed public hearings 5 6 Page 65 of 74 7/24/2025 4 Parliamentary Appeal •Any member may appeal to the Council from a ruling of the Presiding Officer. •If the appeal is seconded, the member may speak once solely on the question involved and the Presiding Officer may explain his/her ruling, but no other Council Member shall participate in the discussion. •The appeal shall be sustained if it is approved by a majority of the members present exclusive of the Presiding Officer. -Rule 1.3(2) Council Rules of Procedure 7 Making Redactions What is a motion: A motion is a “topic under discussion.” •After being recognized by the Presiding Officer, any Council Member can introduce a motion as long as no other motion is on the table. A motion requires a second to be considered. •Each motion must be addressed: passed, defeated, tabled, or postponed indefinitely. 8 Motions 7 8 Page 66 of 74 7/24/2025 5 Types of Motions 1.Main Motions:Introduce items for consideration 2.Subsidiary Motions: Change how a main motion is handled, and are voted on before a main motion 3.Privileged Motions: Used to bring up items that are unrelated to the pending question but are urgent or important enough to interrupt consideration 4.Incidental Motions: Provide means of questioning procedure concerning other motions 9 Motion Examples •Main Motion: “I move to adopt the Consent agenda as is” •Subsidiary Motion: “I move to amend the pending motion to the following…” •Privileged Motion: “I move that we adjourn” •Incidental Motions: “A point of information please” 10 9 10 Page 67 of 74 7/24/2025 6 Incidental Motions 11 MOTIONACTION “A Point of Information please”When you want to inquire as to the facts affecting the business at hand, or as for clarification regarding the business at hand “Madam Mayor, I move that I be allowed to withdraw the motion.” When you want to remove your question from consideration after the motion has been restated by the Presiding Officer “A Parliamentary Inquiry, please” When you would like the opinion (not a ruling) of the Presiding Officer on a matter of parliamentary procedure as it relates to the business at hand “A Point of Order, please” When you want to challenge an error in procedure and requires a ruling by the Presiding Officer Subsidiary Motions 12 MOTIONACTION “I move to reconsider”When you have changed your mind about something that was voted on earlier in the meeting for which you were on the winning side “I move to rescind”Whenyouwanttochangeanactionvotedonat an earlier meeting “I move to amend by: adding, striking, or adding and striking [insert word or phrase]” When you want to change some of the wording in a motion under discussion “I move to substitute your motion for [insert motion.” *After it is seconded, discussion will continue on both motions and the body will vote on the motion they prefer* When you like the idea of a motion being discussed, but you need to reword it beyond simple word changes 11 12 Page 68 of 74 7/24/2025 7 Motions in the BC Council Rules of Procedure 13 1.13 Motions When a motion is made and seconded, it shall be stated by the Presiding Officer before debate. A motion shall not be withdrawn by themover without the consent of the person seconding it. 1.Motions Out of Order With majority consent of the Council, the Presiding Officer may at any time allow an item to be considered out of the regular agendaorder. 2.Division of Question If the question contains two or more propositions, the Presiding Officer may, and upon request of a member, shall divide the same. 3.Precedence of Motions When a motion is before the Council, no other motion shall be entertained except the following which shall have precedence in thefollowing order: •Adjourn •Fix Hour of Adjournment •Table •Limit or Terminate Discussion •Amend / Postpone Motions in the BC Council Rules of Procedure 4.Motion to Adjourn (Not Debatable) a)A motion to adjourn shall be in order at any time except: o When made as an interruption of a member while speaking, o When discussion has ended and vote on a motion is pending, and o While a vote is being taken b)A motion to adjourn "to another time" shall be debatable only as to the time towhich the meeting is adjourned. 5.Motion to Fix Hour of Adjournment All meetings and Work Sessions of the Council shall be adjourned by 10:00 p.m. unless otherwiseagreed to by at least a majority of the Council. A motion to set a different, specific time at which toadjourn shall be undebatable and shall be unamendable except by extraordinary vote (4/5ths). 6.Motion to Table A motion to table shall be undebatable and shall preclude all amendments or debate of the subjectunder consideration. If the motion prevails, the matter shall be "taken from the table" at any timeprior to the end of the next regular meeting, unless the motion is to either table indefinitely or to adate certain. If the motion is to table indefinitely, the matter shall not be rescheduled without atleast majority approval of the Council. 14 13 14 Page 69 of 74 7/24/2025 8 Motions in the BC Council Rules of Procedure 7.Motion to Limit or Terminate Discussion A motion to limit or terminate discussion may be used to limit or close debate on, or prohibit further amendment to, the pending motion. It is undebatable. If the motion fails, debate shall be reopened; if the motion passes, a vote shall be taken on the pending motion. 8.Motion to Amend A motion to amend shall be debatable only as to amendment. A motion to amend an amendment shall be in order, but a motion to amend an amendment to an amendment shall not be in order. An amendment modifying the intention of a motion shall be in order, but an amendment relating to a different matter shall not be in order. A substitute motion on the same subject shall be acceptable, and voted on before a vote on the amendment. Amendments shall be voted first, then the main motion as amended. 9.Motion to Continue Motions to continue to a definite time shall be amendable and debatable as to propriety of postponement and time set. 15 Important Things to Remember To speak, all Council Members must be recognized by the Presiding Officer All motions must be seconded and voted on unless amended or rescinded Making and preserving a good record is more important than the procedure itself 16 15 16 Page 70 of 74 7/24/2025 9 Sources •Robert’s Rules of Order Online http://www.robertsrules.com •Brooklyn Center City Council Meetings, Processes and Procedures – Online Version https://www.brooklyncentermn.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/290/637749881523670000 •Robert’s Rules of Order Simplified- Cornell University https://assembly.cornell.edu/sites/default/files/roberts_rules_simplified.pdf •Robert’s Rules of Order Overview and Summary, Dr. Lawrence F. Keller https://www.clevelandheights.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3728/Roberts-Rules-Overview 17 Questions? 18 17 18 Page 71 of 74 SECTION I – CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS, PROCESSES, AND PROCEDURES City of Brooklyn Center Page 104 City Council Code of Policies In addition, there is a provision for special or emergency meetings where the Council may transact any form of City business. That provision sets specific procedures the Council must follow in calling the meeting. Reference: City Council Resolution Nos. 2006-46 1.3 Parliamentary Procedure The City Council has adopted Roberts Rules of Order Newly Revised for the conduct of meetings. Parliamentary procedure is usually viewed as complex, but it can simply be considered as a set of tools used to assure that a meeting goes smoothly and fairly. It is used to facilitate a group coming to a majority decision when there are differing points of view. 1. Points of Order The Presiding Officer shall determine all points of order subject to the right of any member to appeal to the Council. 2. Parliamentary Appeal Any member may appeal to the Council from a ruling of the Presiding Officer. If the appeal is seconded, the member may speak once solely on the question involved and the Presiding Officer may explain his/her ruling, but no other Council Member shall participate in the discussion. The appeal shall be sustained if it is approved by a majority of the members present exclusive of the Presiding Officer. 3. Decorum and Order – Council Members A. Any Council Member desiring to speak shall address the Presiding Officer and upon recognition, shall address only the question under debate. B. Council Member desiring to question the staff shall address the question to the City Manager or City Attorney, in appropriate cases, who shall respond to the inquiry or designate a staff member to do so. C. A Council Member, once recognized, shall be interrupted while speaking only if called to order by the Presiding Officer, a point of order is raised by another Council Member, or the speaker chooses to yield to questions from another Council Member. D. Any Council Member called to order while speaking shall cease speaking immediately until the question of order is determined. If ruled to be in order, he or she shall proceed. If ruled to be not in order, he or she shall remain silent or shall alter his/her remarks so as to comply with rules of the Council. Page 72 of 74 SECTION I – CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS, PROCESSES, AND PROCEDURES City of Brooklyn Center Page 105 City Council Code of Policies E. Council Members shall accord courtesy to each other, to City employees, and to the public appearing before the Council and shall refrain at all times from rude and derogatory remarks, reflections as to integrity, abusive comments, and statements as to motives and personalities. F. Any Council Member may move to require the Presiding Officer to enforce the rules. Upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the Council, the Presiding Officer shall do so. 4. Decorum and Order – Employees Staff members shall observe the same rules of procedure and decorum applicable to members of the Council. The City Manager shall ensure that they observe such decorum. Any staff member, including the City Manager, desiring to address the Council or members of the public shall first be recognized by the Presiding Officer. All remarks shall be addressed to or through the Presiding Officer. 5. Decorum and Order - Public Members of the public attending Council meetings shall observe the same rules of order and decorum applicable to the Council. The Presiding Officer may order the removal of any person who makes inappropriate remarks or who becomes boisterous while addressing the Council and bar that person from further audience with Council. 6. Enforcement of Decorum The City Manager shall carry out the orders and instructions of the Presiding Officer for maintaining order and decorum in the Council Chambers. 7. Personal Privilege The right of a member to address the Council on a question of personal privilege shall be limited to cases in which his/her integrity, character, or motives are questioned or impugned. 8. Conflict of Interest Any Council Member prevented from voting because of a conflict of interest shall refrain from debate and voting. That Council Member may choose to leave the Council Chambers during debate and voting on the issue. 9. Limitation of Debate A Council Member normally should speak only once on a subject until every other member choosing to speak has done so. Page 73 of 74 SECTION I – CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS, PROCESSES, AND PROCEDURES City of Brooklyn Center Page 106 City Council Code of Policies 10. Dissents and Protests Any Council Member shall have the right to express dissent from or protest any action of the Council. A Council Member wishing to have the dissent or protest entered in the minutes should state so with language such as "I would like the minutes to show that I am opposed to this action for the following reasons:" 11. Rulings of Presiding Officer Final Unless Overruled The Presiding Officer shall decide all questions or interpretation of these rules, points of order, or other questions of procedure requiring rulings. Unless overridden or suspended by a majority vote of the Council Members present and voting, a ruling shall be final and binding for purposes of the matter under consideration. Reference: City Council Resolution Nos. 2011-167; 2006-46 1.4 Order of Business The order of business of each meeting shall be as contained in the agenda prepared by the City Manager. The agenda shall be a listing of subjects which shall be taken up for consideration in the following order: 1. Informal Open Forum with City Council - 6:45 p.m. 2. Invocation* - 7 p.m. 3. Call to Order Regular Business Meeting 4. Roll Call 5. Pledge of Allegiance 6. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda 7. Presentations 8. Public Hearing 9. Planning Commission Items 10. Council Consideration Items (includes ordinances, resolutions, discussion items) 11. Council Report 12. Adjournment *All members of the City Council shall share equally in the responsibility for determining who shall be permitted to deliver said invocations, and said invocations shall not exceed two minutes in length, nor shall said invocations deliver any political message, but instead will stringently adhere to the concept of what an invocation, by definition is, which is, a petition for guidance, and lastly that any reference to a deity in any invocation shall use the inclusive term “God” which is the broad-based spiritual term used in our nation’s Pledge of Allegiance, “. . . one nation under God,” and is also the term used on our currency and coins, “IN GOD WE TRUST.” Reference: City Council Resolution Nos. 2008-146; 2001-146; 98-28; 97-176; 97-12; 96-162 Page 74 of 74