Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997 02-03 CPTFMMINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TASK FORCE OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 3, 1997 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Myrna Kragness called the meeting to order at 7:09 p.m. in the City council chambers. INTRODUCTIONS Members of the task force introduced themselves. Present were: Mayor Kragness, Councilmembers Kathleen Carmody, Kay Lasman, and Robert Peppe; Planning Commissioners Graydon Boeck, Mark Holmes, Rex Newman, Dianne Reem, Brian Walker, and Tim Willson; appointed public members: Jerry Blarney, Maurice Britts, Jim Cole, Tom Donaldson, Toni Johns, Tom Kouri, Tony Kuefler, Frank Slawson, and Ron Thomas; City Manager Michael J. McCauley; Secretary to the Planning Commission/Planning and Zoning Specialist Ronald Warren; Planning Consultants Bill Webber and Suzanne Rhees, BRW, Inc.; and Recording Secretary Arlene Bergfalk. Appointed public members excused were Dale Greenwald and Carroll Vomho£ Refer to Comnrehensive Plan Update Task . Force Anointed: 1-13-97 (attached) for complete listing of names and affiliations of the 24-member task force. OVERVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Mr. Webber explained the purpose of the comprehensive plan and reviewed the year-long timetable for work on the update which includes a public hearing and submission of the plan to the Metropolitan Council, culminating with final City Council approval of the plan at year-end (October 1997). Mr. Webber outlined the various components of the comprehensive plan. Documents dated 2-3-97 were distributed: 1) City of Brooklyn Center Comprehensive Plan 2020: Strengths. Weaknesses. Onortunities and Threats: 2) Issues: 3) Preliminarv Goals and Objectives. ROLE OF THE TASK FORCE It was generally agreed that each member of the task force, which represents a relevant cross-section of citizens and city officials, has equal participation in the updating process; however, the City Councilmembers will ultimately determine specific issues. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE ANALYSIS OF CONDITIONS Using overhead transparencies, Ms. Rhees reviewed extensive demographic data developed from the 1990 census and Metropolitan Council predictions that serve as the basis for updating the comprehensive plan. She summarized observations gleaned from the data that describe the current condition of the City of Brooklyn Center. 2-3-97 1 During discussion, some disagreement with the data and predictions presented were expressed. Specifically, expansion of employment opportunities and school population projections were questioned. City Manager McCauley suggested the City develop its vision for the future with explanations of reasons for disagreement with forecasts of the Metropolitan Council. OUTCOME OF JOINT ISSUE IDENTIFICATION MEETING Mr. Webber reviewed the document entitled: Comprehensive Plan 2020, Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats, which is a compilation of the specific issues important to the City's elected and appointed officials, identified and prioritized at the work session conducted on October 30, 1996. Mr. Webber reviewed the document entitled: Comprehensive Plan 2020, Issues. This paper condenses and categorizes the opinions listed in the previous document into a framework to guide the development of plan goals, objectives, policies, physical plans, and implementation programs for the City's future. The general issues are: image and appearance; business and economic development; housing; neighborhood design and zoning; infrastructure and municipal services; transportation and linkages. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Mr. Webber reviewed the document entitled: Comprehensive Plan 2020, Preliminary Goals and Objectives. The fundamental goals are intended to support the City's opportunity to build on community attributes to become a "suburban village." Using visual drawings, Mr. Webber described the City as a village with a commercial and civic center, a central green space, surrounded by pleasant and intimate neighborhoods with safe quiet streets, and a strong community spirit. The challenge for the City is to retrofit, refocus and link it's "raw materials" into a unique and desirable niche in the Twin Cities area. This paper also provides detailed objectives and action plans in the areas of community development, neighborhood development, image and appearance, housing, natural environment, transportation and circulation, and fiscal matters. During discussion, Mr. Thomas, general manager of the Brookdale shopping center, provided information regarding the issues facing the center and answered questions from task force members about the center's status and role in the City's future. Mr. Webber encouraged the members to contemplate the information presented for further consideration and discussion at the next meeting of the task force. He pointed out that revision, refinement and additions to the objectives should be made throughout the planning process. TASK FORCE MEETING SCHEDULE The task force members accepted the proposed dates for subsequent meetings: April 7; May 5; June 2; and July 21, 1997. 2-3-97 2 ADJOURNMENT The next meeting of the task force will be at 7 p.m., Monday, April 7, in the City council chambers. The meeting concluded at 9:15 p.m. Chair b Recorded and transcribed by: Arlene Bergfalk TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial 1 2-3-97