Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025.10.13 CCP REGULARCITY COUNCIL MEETING City Hall Council Chambers October 13, 2025 AGENDA 1.Call to Order - 7:00 p.m. Attendees please turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full meeting packet is available in the binder at the entrance to the Council Chambers. 2.Roll Call 3.Pledge of Allegiance 4.Informal Open Forum This is an opportunity for the public to address the City Council on items that are not on the agenda. It is limited to 15 minutes. It may not be used to make personal attacks, air personal grievances, make political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with the presenter. Questions from the Council will be for clarification purposes only. It will not be used as a time for problem-solving or reacting to the comments made but for hearing the presenter for informational purposes only. The first call will be for those that have notified the Clerk that they would like to speak during the open forum and then ask if anyone connected to this meeting would like to speak. When called upon, please indicate your name and then proceed. Please be sure to state your name before speaking. a.Meeting Decorum 5.Invocation - Jerzak 6.Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda These items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There isn't a separate discussion for these items unless a Councilmember so requests, then it is moved to the end of the Council Consideration Items. a.Approval of Minutes b.Approval of Licenses c.Resolution Approving the City of Brooklyn Center City Council Code of Respect - Motion to approve the Resolution Adopting the City Council Code of Respect and Ethics d.Resolution Approving the City of Brooklyn Center Commission Code of Respect - Motion to approve the Resolution Adopting the City Commission Code of Respect and Ethics Page 1 of 269 e. Approval of the Council Meeting Decorum -Motion to Approve the Amended Council Meeting Decorum f. Resolution Approving Participation in the Brazos Citation Software Solution - Motion to approve the Resolution Approving Participation in the Brazos Citation Software Solution g. Approval of Special TIF Legislation - Motion to Approve the Resolution Approving Special Legislation Related to Brooklyn Center Tax Increment Financing Authority h. Resolution Acknowledging and Accepting LCA Predevelopment Grant Funds for Amani Construction & Development, LLC for Townhomes at the 5400 block of Brooklyn Blvd - Motion to Approve a Resolution Accepting LCA Predevelopment Grant Funds for Amani Construction & Development, LLC for Townhomes at the 5400 block of Brooklyn Blvd i. Resolution in Support of an Application to the Minnesota Brownfield Gap Financing Grant Program for Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment for the Amani Construction & Development Townhomes Project. - Motion to Approve a Resolution in support of an application to the Minnesota Brownfield Gap Financing Grant Program for Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessment for the Amani Construction & Development Townhomes project. j. Resolution Providing for the Issuance and Sale of General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A in the Proposed Aggregate Principal Amount of $6,180,000 and Obligating the City to be Bound By and Use the Provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 446A.086 to Guarantee the Payment of the Principal and Interest on Certain Bonds and Authorizing the Execution of a Credit Enhancement Program Agreement - Motion to Approve a Resolution Providing for the Issuance and Sale of General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A in the Proposed Aggregate Principal Amount of $6,180,000 and Obligating the City to be Bound By and Use the Provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 446A.086 to Guarantee the Payment of the Principal and Interest on Certain Bonds and Authorizing the Execution of a Credit Enhancement Program Agreement k. Resolution Approving a Lease Agreement Between the City of Brooklyn Center and LOGIS through December 31, 2028 - Motion to Approve a Resolution Approving a Lease Agreement Between the City of Brooklyn Center and LOGIS through December 31, 2028 7. Presentations/Proclamations/Recognitions/Donations a. Hennepin Recycling Group (HRG) Update - Motion to accept the presentation. Page 2 of 269 b. Proclamation Declaring October as Domestic Violence Awareness Month in the City of Brooklyn Center - Motion to approve the Proclamation c. Proclamation Declaring October as Breast Cancer Awareness Month in the City of Brooklyn Center - Motion to approve the Proclamation 8. Public Hearings a. Public Hearings on Proposed Special Assessments for Nuisance Abatement Costs, Administrative Fines/Citations, Tall Grass and Weed Abatement Costs, Dead/Disease Tree Abatement Costs, and Administratively Registered Vacant Properties. -Motion to open the public hearing for Administrative Citation; -Motion to close the public hearing for Administrative Citations; and -Motion to Adopt Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Administrative Citations to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls. -Motion to open the public hearing for Diseased Tree Removal Costs; -Motion to close the public hearing for Diseased Tree Removal Costs; and -Motion to Adopt Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Diseased Tree Removal Costs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls. -Motion to open the public hearing for Weed Removal Costs; -Motion to close the public hearing for Weed Removal Costs; and -Motion to Adopt Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Weed Removal Costs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls. -Motion to open the public hearing for Nuisance Abatement Costs; -Motion to close the public hearing for Nuisance Abatement Costs; and -Motion to Adopt Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Nuisance Abatement Costs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls. -Motion to open the public hearing for Administratively Registering Vacant Properties; -Motion to close the public hearing for Administratively Registering Vacant Properties; and -Motion to Adopt Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Administratively Registering Vacant Properties to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls. b. Public Hearings on Certification of Special Assessments for Delinquent Public Utility Service Accounts and Emergency Private Utility Service Repairs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls - Motion to Open Public Hearing on Delinquent Public Utility Service Accounts; -Take Comments; -Motion to Close Public Hearing on Delinquent Public Utility Service Accounts; and -Motion to Approve a Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Page 3 of 269 Delinquent Public Service Utility Service Accounts to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls - Motion to Open Public Hearing on Emergency Private Utility Service Repairs; -Take Comments; -Motion to Close Public Hearing on Emergency Private Utility Service Repairs; and -Motion to Approve a Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Emergency Private Utility Service Repairs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls 9. Planning Commission Items 10. Council Consideration Items a. On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Application for WK Brown, LLC, Wayne Brown, Palm Grove Event Center, 2590 Freeway Blvd Staff is seeking city council consideration of an application for On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License pursuant to Chapter 11 Sections 11-115 and Sections 11-122 of the Brooklyn Center City Code. Motion options: - Motion to approve On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License as presented; - Motion to approve On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License with conditions; and - Motion to deny On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License. b. Repeal Of Chapter 12-310 - Premises Identification - Motion to approve an ordinance repealing section 12-310 of the Brooklyn Center City code regarding commercial premises Identification (First reading) 11. Council Report 12. Adjournment Page 4 of 269 COUNCIL MEETING DECORUM To ensure meetings are conducted in a professional and courteous manner which enables the orderly conduct of business, all persons in attendance or who participate in such meetings shall conduct themselves in a manner that does not interfere with the ability of others to observe and, when allowed, to participate without disruption or fear of intimidation. A. Decorum. Persons who attend meetings must avoid conduct that disrupts, interferes with, or disturbs the orderly conduct of the meeting or the ability of other attendees to observe and participate as appropriate. To that end, persons who attend meetings are subject to the following: (1) Members of the public may only speak during meetings when allowed under Council Rules and only after being recognized by the presiding officer. The presiding officer may establish time limits for the acceptance of public comments or testimony. (2) Public comments or testimony must be addressed to the presiding officer and not to other Council Members, staff, or others in attendance. (3) All elected officials shall be referred to by their proper title and surname. (4) Public comments should avoid personal accusations, profanity, or other improper content for a public meeting. (5) Intimidating behaviors, threats of hostility, or actual violence are disallowed. (6) Audible demonstrations intended to disrupt the meeting should be avoided, including stomping of feet, snapping of fingers, clapping of hands, and other conduct that may be intimidating or threatening to others. (7) Holding, displaying, or placing banners, signs, objects, or other materials in any way that endangers others, prevents the free flow of individuals within the chamber, or obstructs or prevents the viewing of the meeting by others is not allowed. B. The presiding officer shall request any person(s) who disrupt, interfere with or disturb the orderly conduct of a meeting to cease the conduct and, as necessary, shall issue an oral warning to the individual(s) found to be in violation. If the individual(s) persists in disrupting, interfering with, or disturbing the meeting, the presiding officer may have the individual(s) removed or, under appropriate circumstances, temporarily clear the gallery. If for any reason the presiding officer fails to take such action, a majority vote may be substituted for action by the presiding officer to maintain order and decorum over the proceedings. C. The Council Chambers capacity is 76 persons per fire code. Page 5 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: THROUGH: BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve the following minutes: • September 22, 2025, Study Session • September 22, 2025, Regular Session Background: Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2025.09.22 SS Draft 2. 2025.09.22 CC Draft Page 6 of 269 9/22/25 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION SEPTEMBER 22, 2025 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session called to order by Mayor April Graves at 6:02 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor April Graves, Councilmembers Teneshia Kragness, Dan Jerzak, and Laurie Ann Moore. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards, City Clerk Shannon Pettit, and City Attorney Siobhan Tolar. Councilmember Kris Lawrence-Anderson was absent and excused. CITY COUNCIL MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION ITEMS Mayor Graves asked for any agenda questions or miscellaneous discussion items. Dr. Edwards stated there are two items: Resolution Authorizing Brooklyn Center Staff to Execute All Necessary Documents to Ensure Participation in the Multistate Settlements Relating to Opioid Supply Chain Participants, to be added to Council Consent, item 6d., which we had previously participated in; as well as add a Closed Session discussion to the Regular Agenda, item 11. Councilmember Jerzak asked for clarification on the Code of Respect since the only one on the agenda was for Commissioners. He asked if the Council Code of Respect is considered done. He also noted that he did not find any changes to the Commission Code of Respect, other than what was requested by Council. Dr. Edwards said in principle yes, there are minor tweaks, but there is no structural fundamental change, and some clarification to draw some distinction between the role of Councils and Commissioners, but that is pretty much it. Mayor Graves said there has not been any discussion on the Decorum yet, but that would happen. Councilmember Jerzak said he thought a thorough vetting was appropriate, but he would like to move the Code of Respect along. Mayor Graves said there has not been a chance to discuss after receiving feedback on the Code of Respect, but that it would happen. Page 7 of 269 9/22/25 -2- DRAFT CITY COMMISSION CODE OF RESPECT AND ETHICS DISCUSSION Mayor Graves asked Dr. Edwards if he could give an overview of the feedback and minor tweaks that were made on the Code of Respect and Ethics. Dr. Edwards said he could, and by the time he is finished, he hopes City Attorney Siobhan Tolar will be there because she was the principal author, but he can speak to the changes that were made and the rationale behind them. Dr. Edwards explained that the Code of Respect was sent out to Commissioners for feedback and asked for more time at the last Council meeting. A few additional comments did come in from the Financial Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, the Culture of Arts, and Sister Cities Commission. He explained that the responses were very similar across Commissions, with three primary concerns being brought forward. One issue was the possibility of infringement upon First Amendment rights, primarily freedom of speech, in particular, and modifications were made to the Code of Respect that he would address later. The second was the process being used unfairly to dismiss a Commission member, meaning if a Councilmember did not like a perspective or a particular individual, the process would be used in a way to easily dismiss that Commissioner without due process. The third issue raised was the prospect that the Council adopt the Code of Respect, execute it, and model the behavior that the Council wants to see prior to the Commissioners adopting the Code of Respect. Dr. Edwards said he would now address what is being done regarding the three concerns raised by Commissioners, and then City Attorney Siobhan Tolar would discuss the changes, as she is the principal drafter. Regarding First Amendment rights, while it was not felt that the document infringed on First Amendment rights, it should be made clear, and some additional language was added to the document on page two, which states, "these guidelines are meant to establish professional boundaries between Commissioners. And are in no way meant to be a restriction on speech. Decorum rules governing the conduct are essential to the smooth operation of public meetings." This clearly states up front that First Amendment rights are not intended to be infringed upon by this policy. In addition, there was a section taken out of the policy that related to the context of private conversations Commissioners could have within their homes or privately with citizens, because it was not applicable and confusing. This policy applies to elected officials, and Commissioners do not operate in the same way as elected officials, so this policy would only apply to Commissioners when they are acting in a role at a City-sanctioned event or meeting. The City has no authority over Commissioners to govern behavior or conversations a Commissioner has as an individual citizen. Dr. Edwards continued that he wanted to speak to the issue of concern that a Commissioner could be dismissed easily and in an unfair way. There is a three-step process at a minimum, with aspects of the process that would mitigate the dismissal in an unfair way. Nothing is ever 100 percent fail- safe; however, Dr. Edwards believes that the process outlines the steps, particularly beginning with the restorative process, which lends itself to being able to protect someone from being targeted. If conflicts were to arise, there is an opportunity for Commissioners to address and resolve them prior to anything being punitive. In the event there is a complaint filed after the restorative process has occurred, there is an investigation that would take place, which would also prevent the process Page 8 of 269 9/22/25 -3- DRAFT from being abused. The results of that investigation would be provided to the Council in a blind way, with no names provided that would identify the individual, again to make sure that there was no bias, and the process could not be abused to dismiss anyone unfairly. Dr. Edwards reiterated that this process is intended to be restorative in nature and that adults may resolve conflicts amongst themselves. If there is a complaint, there is a due process and investigation with blind results provided that could then hopefully be resolved through mediation, if not, the Council could make an appropriate decision. Dr. Edwards asked City Attorney Siobhan Tolar if she had anything to add regarding the concerns about the Code of Respect or changes that were made. City Attorney Siobhan Tolar stated that Dr. Edwards is correct, there is a restorative component in this, but that complaint comes first. A sanction or restorative measures are how the complaint is addressed, and the complaint goes to the City Manager or to the Mayor. From there, the complaint would be investigated, and from there it would be determined what type of addressing the situation needed, and would begin with restorative measures, where the two parties would begin mediation. If one person is uninterested in mediating, then it would move to sanctions depending on the severity of the offense. Once the restorative process has played out, and if nothing has been resolved, then the sanction process would begin, which is the most severe punishment, and would be a blind process for the Council. The Council would not know which Commission, or Commissioner, the sanction pertained to, only the facts of the situation to determine if that warranted dismissal from the Commission. Councilmember Moore thanked Dr. Edwards and Ms. Tolar for that summary. She asked about the process to initiate the complaint and where in the policy it details the complaint process. Ms. Tolar said it stated on page seven, under section three, which details the complaint and reporting process. Ms. Tolar explained that the City Staff member may bring a potential Code of Respect violation by a Commissioner to the City Manager or the Human Resources Manager. Councilmember Moore said she got lost because that page started with conduct with other public, and then poor conduct and accountability measures, and then the process is in there, but she could not find it at first. Ms. Tolar explained that the policy is structured basically the same way the Council’s Code of Ethics is and describes the code, and the process if the code is violated. Ms. Tolar said if there were suggestions on reordering the way it is written, she and Dr. Edwards would be happy to hear them. Councilmember Moore said she would go with the consensus of her colleagues on that, and has read this code quite a few times, but still could not find the complaint- filing process in the code. She continued that if everyone else is clear on the process, and the Commissioners did not bring it up, then it must not have been an issue for anyone else. Councilmember Kragness asked how freedom of speech is being balanced, and gave the example of someone making derogatory comments on social media or participating in bad behavior that reflects poorly on the employer; the employee could be let go. She noted that employers do not want to be connected to bad behavior, even if the employee is participating in bad behavior when Page 9 of 269 9/22/25 -4- DRAFT they are not on the clock with their employer. Ms. Tolar said that is a very good question, and that the First Amendment law is very much influx right now, but there are laws regarding employment with clear guidelines to what an employee can say and how the City can respond, as well as a principal called First Amendment retaliation, but it is a very fine line on what people can and cannot say, and would have to be handled on a case-by-case basis. She reiterated that the government cannot limit one’s speech, and the City has to be careful. Mayor Graves thanked Dr. Edwards and Ms. Tolar for incorporating the feedback from the Commissions into the Code of Respect, and making changes to differentiate Councilmembers and Commissioners and how they are all held accountable, and adamantly stating that their Code of Respect is not meant to infringe on anyone's freedom of speech. MEETING DECORUM DISCUSSION Mayor Graves said she has been reading this document since shortly after taking office as Mayor, and some things in the document felt culturally insensitive to her. Some parts of this document are also around the freedom of speech, as well, and the City Attorney has not looked through this document, but she advised that the City Attorney does so to ensure that the Council is not overstepping boundaries with the Decorum. She stated that the first paragraph of the Decorum is just boilerplate policies to ensure meetings are conducted in a professional and courteous manner. Mayor Graves discussed the Decorum for persons who attend meetings and must conduct themselves in a manner not to disrupt, interfere with, or disturb the speaker, and are only allowed to speak under Council rules and after being recognized by the presiding officer, with a time limit. Public testimony must be addressed to the presiding officer and not other Councilmembers, Staff, or others in attendance. All elected officials shall be referred to by proper title and surname. Public comments should avoid personal accusations, profanity, or other improper content for a public meeting. Intimidating behaviors, threats, hostility, or actual violence are disallowed. All demonstrations intended to disrupt the meeting should be avoided, including stomping feet, snapping fingers, clapping of hands, and other conduct that may be intimidating or threatening to others. Mayor Graves said clapping and cheers only seemed like a problem when it had been a more contentious topic. The other item she would like to discuss is the portion regarding holding, displaying, or placing banners, signs, objects, or materials in any way that endangers others or prevents the free flow of individuals within the chamber. She said she does not have an issue with this part of the policy as long as signs are still allowed, unless the sign was derogatory or inappropriate. Mayor Graves continued that the policy stated that the presiding officer shall request any person who disrupts, interferes with, or disturbs the meeting to cease the conduct, and as necessary, the presiding officer will issue an oral warning to the individuals found to be in violation. If the individual is persistent, the presiding officer may have the individual removed or, under appropriate circumstances, temporarily clear the gallery. If the presiding officer fails to take such action, a majority vote may be substituted for action by the presiding officer to maintain order and Page 10 of 269 9/22/25 -5- DRAFT Decorum over the proceedings. She stated that she does not have a problem with this either and would be more likely to clear the gallery than order an individual to be removed. Mayor Graves said the main policy that she has an issue with is number six, the portion regarding people clapping or snapping fingers, because while the Council does not want people purposely disrupting the meeting, she also does not want to get to a place where sometimes people are allowed to clap or snap their fingers and other times they are shut down because that shows favoritism. In situations like that, people could argue that the Council is stifling free speech that the Council does not agree with. Mayor Graves asked for other Councilmembers' opinions on that. Councilmember Jerzak stated under section A1, he would like to offer, instead of the presiding officer, that the Council may establish time limits for speaking, but there are already established time limits. He stated that the Mayor already gives good leeway for speakers when they are discussing something important, she lets them continue over the time limit for a little while, but as a general rule, the Council should also be able to establish a time limit. He understands her concerns with number six, and he does not have a problem with residents having signs as long as they are not inappropriate or derogatory, and he does not want a disruption of freedom of speech, but those things need to be determined in a case-by-case situation. He stated he would go with whatever the Council consensus is, but he sees these as bookends and guidelines. Councilmember Kragness said she would recommend taking number six out and not reading it aloud as a rule of Decorum. She stated that snapping fingers is a way of showing agreement without disrupting the meeting, but it is not equivalent to shouting. She stated that anytime this has happened during a meeting, it has been momentary and is not continual, and she does not have a problem with it. She stated this goes along with First Amendment rights, as they have been discussing tonight, people have the right to speech, so number six should be removed entirely. Mayor Graves asked which policy already covers how to handle a disruptive person. Councilmember Kragness said that with section A, and as long as clapping or snapping is not disrupting the meeting, it should not be called out as it is culturally insensitive. She said if the Council is going to start labeling every type of disruption, it goes beyond the scope of what the Council is trying to achieve at this moment. Councilmember Moore said she would agree with Councilmember Kragness regarding section A of the Decorum, but asked Ms. Tolar to weigh in on free speech and if snapping, stomping, clapping, or humming are considered free speech, as well as signs or banners. Ms. Tolar said that signs fall under free speech, conduct is something she would have to research, but she would err on the side of yes because it is a way of demonstrating physically versus verbally, because some people are non-verbal. Councilmember Moore said she would be fine taking out both sections six and seven of the rules of Decorum. Her main concern is that the presiding officer, whoever that is, should be following the rules of Decorum consistently, and if there is snapping or clapping, it should either all be allowed or none at all. She stated that in her opinion, none of it should be allowed because the Council is conducting a business meeting regarding the affairs of the City. She said that if a banner is part of free speech, what is or is not appropriate, and who makes that determination. She Page 11 of 269 9/22/25 -6- DRAFT continued that there are a lot of symbols and words in other languages, that she does not know what they mean, and would not know if a sign using those would be inappropriate or offensive to any group or individual, and if it was, how that determination would be made. Ms. Tolar said she does not know who would be responsible for making that determination, but these meetings are a public forum for people to come in and speak, and in some forms that can be limited, and in other forms it cannot. She stated she does not love giving legal advice on the record, but she would research this issue a little bit to give the Council a more definitive answer. She noted that the First Amendment law is very much in flux right now, in terms of what is considered offensive and not offensive, and what is allowed and what the government can and cannot do. Traditionally, hate speech is not protected by the government, but again, First Amendment rights are in flux, and who gets to decide what is hate speech, and a lot of these issues are litigated in court. In some ways, this would be a best judgment call, and this conversation is very productive, but she does not think the Council will be able to come to a decision today, only because the Council needs more legal guidance and guidelines, and she cannot give that to them right now. She noted that the Council should keep in mind that the First Amendment does protect all speech, whether the Council likes it or not, and could be almost anything. Councilmember Moore said she agrees with Councilmember Jerzak that the Council has established the two-minute time limit rather than the presiding officer. She asked Mayor Graves about her statement regarding clearing the gallery rather than an individual and asked for clarity on what point or level a person can get to before the Mayor would ask someone to leave. Mayor Graves said she would ask someone to leave, but she is not comfortable with ordering someone to be removed. Councilmember Moore said that language might need to be softer then and wants it to be clear on clearing the gallery versus an individual, and what the tipping point is for the presiding officer, whoever that may be, to determine that the individual needs to be removed. She asked if an individual needs to be removed, who removes them, and if that has ever happened before. She stated she does not know the history, but would like the policy to be clearer for anyone who is in that position on how to handle that, and if anyone knows what the threshold is to remove someone. Councilmember Kragness said the policy states that removing an individual is based on the presiding officer's discretion. If the presiding officer does not feel that it is at the level of threatening or needing to have that person removed, then it is the presiding officer's responsibility to determine that, and if not, then the policy also states that the majority can step in. She stated that Councilmember Moore’s questions are answered within that portion of the policy. She noted that the policy states that the presiding officer may have the individual removed, but it does not say that the presiding officer has to. Mayor Graves said she does not feel comfortable removing someone and will not do it, even if she may. Councilmember Moore asked that if this did come up, would it be a motion from a Councilmember and then a consensus to have the person removed, and then a process, or how would it work? She stated she just wants to ask the question, and she does not necessarily want a presiding officer to be the one making that call to remove someone, but it does allow the Council consensus as well. Mayor Graves said some type of action would have to be taken, and someone would have to make Page 12 of 269 9/22/25 -7- DRAFT a motion, a second, and then at least three votes in favor to have them removed. Mayor Graves continued that if someone is being disruptive or rude, that is one thing, but if someone was being physically violent, she would hope that the majority of the Council would agree to remove that person, and that is not the type of situation she was originally referring to. Councilmember Moore asked Dr. Edwards, under Freedom of Speech, at what point is the threshold to remove someone from a meeting. Dr. Edwards said there have been similar conversations in other jurisdictions about this, which have had to remove individuals from their meetings. He explained that first, the threshold to remove someone is significantly high, meaning the individual is an imminent threat or danger to City Staff, or a crime has occurred. He explained that he would not be comfortable asking anyone on City Staff other than a police officer to remove someone from a meeting. He acknowledged that having a police officer remove someone creates challenges because it may exacerbate the problem, so in that instance, it may be better to clear the gallery as opposed to escalating the situation. He said that in some cases, some people come to the meetings with the intent to escalate and create a situation, so he advised the Council to do their best not to engage in those circumstances. Councilmember Jerzak said the more he thinks about the policy under number six regarding snapping and clapping, the more he questions how to control a spontaneous reaction. He noted that the guide should always allow more speech. He stated he concurs with Mayor Graves about removing people, and it is better to de-escalate or shut down. Mayor Graves said clapping or snapping is mildly disruptive for a short amount of time, and it does not seem productive to try to stifle that because it may create a bigger issue. Councilmember Jerzak said it would be like telling a kid not to do something, and then they do it twice. Mayor Graves said as long as the clapping or snapping is not continually disruptive to the meeting, she lets it go, but if someone is constantly talking in the back of Council Chambers and is distracting, she would ask them to take their conversation outside of Chambers. She noted that it is more about recognizing that if you want to have conversations in the middle of a Council meeting, that would be the place to do it, and it is not good manners. Dr. Edwards said if someone is talking in the background, he would be comfortable asking City Staff to ask them to step outside and escort them, but that is different than removing someone from Council Chambers. Mayor Graves said she does not feel like the City Attorney needs to go back and do additional editing of the Decorum, and that there is enough consensus from this conversation to remove sections six and seven as they are both thoroughly covered by the first paragraph in the Decorum around avoiding conduct that interferes with or disturbs the conduct of the meeting, or the ability of the attendees to observe and participate as appropriate. She also said she has no problem changing the time limit for speakers being established by the Council. Councilmember Moore said that individuals who are talking amongst themselves during the meeting and whispering are no different than someone clapping, stomping, or snapping their fingers. Individuals who do this are engaging with the Council in a way, and to her, she would Page 13 of 269 9/22/25 -8- DRAFT rather the presiding officer not squelch people who are talking about something that may have been discussed by the Council. She stated she also does not want to squelch speech, which could include a variety of things. Mayor Graves said she understands what Councilmember Moore is saying, and she is not trying to squelch anyone's speech either, but if someone is being disruptive, then that is a different scenario. Councilmember Moore said she thinks she and Mayor Graves are in agreement, and is in favor of removing sections six and seven, and asked if the Decorum rules should also include section B, or not. Councilmember Kragness said that section B. should be kept because it reminds the audience each time what the expectation is, instead of assuming it is known, it is clearly stated. Mayor Graves said Section B. speaks to the consequences of not following the rules of Decorum and is important to keep, hopefully, as a diversion to prevent any bad behavior from happening. Mayor Graves asked if the Council wanted to wait until there is a new edited version of the Decorum and then put it on the next agenda. That way, Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson could also be present to vote. The Council unanimously agreed. Dr. Edwards said, based on the conversations they had tonight, he thought the Council was clear on the direction, and it would come under the Consent Agenda. Mayor Graves stated she was fine with it being on the Consent Agenda. Mayor Graves asked if there were any other miscellaneous items for the Council to discuss. The Council had no other issues it wished to discuss. Mayor Graves asked if there were any Work Session items to discuss. Dr. Edwards said there were no Work Session items on the agenda. CITY MANAGER MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION ITEMS ADJOURNMENT Mayor Graves adjourned the Study Session at 6:49 p.m. Page 14 of 269 9/22/25 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION SEPTEMBER 22, 2025 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL The Brooklyn Center City Council met in an Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor April Graves at 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Mayor April Graves, Councilmembers Teneshia Kragness, Dan Jerzak, and Laurie Ann Moore. Also present were City Manager Reggie Edwards, Community Development Director Jesse Anderson, Finance Director Angela Holm, City Clerk Shannon Pettit, and City Attorney Siobhan Tolar. Councilmember Kris Lawrence-Anderson was absent and excused. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 4. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM Mayor April Graves opened the meeting for the purpose of an Informal Open Forum and reviewed the Rules of Decorum. No one wished to address the Council. Councilmember Moore moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded to close the Informal Open Forum. Motion passed unanimously. 5. INVOCATION Mayor April Graves recited a poem she wrote, titled “Be the Blueprint.” “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. We were warned by the smoke from burning ballads, by the bruises left by billy clubs. By the hush of textbooks that skipped chapters, and spent centuries in footnotes. We were warned, but still, here we Page 15 of 269 9/22/25 -2- DRAFT are. A nation seemingly addicted to amnesia, rewriting oppression in prettier fonts and calling it progress. But history doesn't whisper anymore, it shouts. From Ferguson to Flint, to fires on sacred lands, from stolen lives to stolen votes. From bans on books to bans on bodies. This ain’t new. It’s the remix of the same old song. Power hoarding, truth distorting, systems exploiting, people resisting. Power concedes nothing without a demand. So tell me, what will be the demand when the ballot feels broken and the breath in our chest comes with a price. When justice comes with conditions, and freedom has a footnote. Don’t say the system works when it was never designed to work for all of us. A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything. And too many are falling still, for flag colored lies, for law and order. The murders in the daylight for silence, masquerading as peace. We watch the Pledge of Allegiance with one hand, while signing death warrants with the other. But I don't pledge to hypocrisy. I don't kneel to systems that devour the people they claim to serve. We were warned. But warnings mean nothing if we don't change course. Change isn't in slogans. Change is in Community Gardens and restorative circles. Food drives that double as survival plans. A mother teaching her son that he's more than what the system says. Change is small, relational. Radical in its insistence that everyone has the right to live whole. So we reach back to Fannie Lou, who said, 'I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired.' To Angela, who said, 'You have to act as if it were possible to radically transform the world, and you have to do it all the time.' So we act, not to save a broken thing, but to build something new. To school, the state, and lessons, it refuses to learn, like human lives are not collateral. Black indigenous futures are not negotiable. Gender is not a threat. And liberation, that's not a luxury, that's a right. We were warned, but warnings become wisdom only when we listen, and wisdom becomes power only when we act. So write the real history, teach the truth loud, stand with the silenced, not the proud. Don’t just follow the path, be the blueprint. Etch freedom in action, not just in intent. Be fire and foundation, be mirror and movement, be the dream and the disobedience. Because justice isn’t passive, and love isn’t silent. So don’t wait for what’s coming, be the blueprint today.” 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Moore moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda, as amended, with amendments to add to the Consent Agenda, item 6d. The Opioid Settlement, and added item 11, to be in closed session after Council Consideration Items, and the following consent items were approved: 6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. September 8, 2025 – Study Session 2. September 8, 2025 – Regular Session 6b. LICENSES AMUSEMENT DEVICES Rigel Llc 1200 Shingle Creek Crossing Page 16 of 269 9/22/25 -3- DRAFT Rigel Llc 6350 Brooklyn Boulevard MECHANICAL Admiral Radon Mechanical Services LLC 13816 Utah Avenue Savage 55378 United States Mechanical 3526 88th Avenue NE Blaine 55014 Zahl Petroleum Maintenance 3101 Spring Street NE Minneapolis 55413 RENTAL INITIAL (TYPE IV – six-month license) 5408 Girard Avenue N JDK Premier Properties 5849 Colfax Avenue N Bismuth Bridge PropCO LLC INITIAL (TYPE III – one-year license) 3415 65th Avenue N Granite City Apts LLC INITIAL (TYPE II – two-year license) 4207 Lakeside Avenue, #231 Paris Gatlin INITIAL (TYPE I – three-year license) 4201 Lakeside Avenue, #106 Wallace A Sharp & Janet L Sharp RENEWAL (TYPE IV – six-month license) 3600 Admiral Lane N HPA CL1 LLC RENEWAL (TYPE III – one-year license) 4100 Lakebreeze Avenue N PBK Properties LLC RENEWAL (TYPE II – two-year license) 5442 James Avenue N Brandon J Stigsell 5621 Humboldt Avenue N Abad Martinez RENEWAL (TYPE I – three-year license) 2924 67th Avenue N Ivan Tkach 3906 52nd Avenue N Randy Hammond 6800 Dupont Avenue N Caml LLC Page 17 of 269 9/22/25 -4- DRAFT 6c. RESOLUTION APPROVING JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE INTERNET CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN TASK FORCE (ICAC) 7. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS 7a. HIGHWAY 252/I-94 PRESENTATION BY THE 252 SAFETY TASK FORCE Dr. Edwards stated that several years ago, the Council had authorized and supported the Highway 252 Task Force, which is a group of community members that raised their voices around the issues related to Highway 252, and they have a presentation for the Council as well as an update on their work. Highway 252 Safety Task Force member Tom Corey thanked Mayor Graves and the Council for the opportunity to provide a Highway 252 Safety Task Force Update and for the work towards improving this project. Mr. Corey explained that this presentation will focus on topical areas of concern and provide recommendations. He asked that the Council hold questions until the first recommendation slide topic is presented. The five topical areas are: Minnesota vs. Federal Environmental Law, Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) promises, public engagement contracts, congestion as soon as Highway 252 opens, and community betterment areas. MnDOT law provisions are generally stricter than federal law provisions; the stricter provision applies. Critically important is the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Substantive Standards, stating that no action should result in pollution, impairment, or destruction of natural resources if a feasible and prudent alternative exists, even if the alternative is more expensive. When Interstate 35E was being planned from 94 down to Highway 5, the original design proposed a direct route with a bridge across Blackhawk Lake. Local residents objected, citing environmental concerns, especially the impact on water quality, wild habitat, aesthetics, and quietude. The case escalated all the way to the Minnesota Supreme Court, which ruled in 1980 that the highway must avoid the lake because there was a less environmentally harmful alternative. MEPA’s core principle is that you cannot damage the environment unless there is no viable alternative, and it was a key part of the court's decision. Thanks to MEPA, the plan was changed, and Interstate 35E now curves around the lake. Mr. Corey continued that Presidential Executive Order number 14173 made the Federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental law weaker by eliminating environmental justice and equity. He said the City needs to take full advantage of Minnesota environmental law to push a vision of how to benefit Brooklyn Center residents, and Minnesota law is on the City's side. Highway 35E between I-94 and Highway 5 was built as a lower speed four-lane parkway rather than a typical six-lane freeway as a compromise to local residents. The parkway design is a lower speed, with commercial vehicles over 9,000 pounds banned, and extensive landscaping used for noise control. Community input was key to making tangible changes, and Minnesota law was applied to an interstate freeway. Mr. Corey stated that the Highway 252 Task Force has asked for many of these same elements, for safety measures and a formal environmental impact study, but it has all been rejected due to not meeting a narrow transportation focus, purpose, and need. Page 18 of 269 9/22/25 -5- DRAFT He said the bottom line is that there is a precedent for environmental law and public engagement to reshape a major infrastructure project. Mr. Corey reiterated that the City needs to aggressively articulate its position on this issue. Mr. Corey compared the Minnesota MEPA law to the Federal NEPA law. MEPA provides much stronger protection in almost every category and is more comprehensive. MEPA looks at economic impacts, which are very important to Brooklyn Center, where NEPA does not. MEPA also looks more comprehensively at community impacts. Mr. Corey stated that the bottom line is that the decision is based solely on federal NEPA law and is not acceptable, and does not protect the residents of Brooklyn Center. Mr. Corey continued that after the Presidential Order eliminated Environmental Justice and Equity, his Council raised concerns on May 7. The Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) Chair sent a letter addressed to all PAC members, PAC meeting attendees, and the Highway 252 Safety Task Force regarding Environmental Justice and Equity concerns that they have heard over the past seven years. The May 7 letter stated that the community concerns are a priority, and there is a commitment to updating the MnDOT process to include those community concerns. Mr. Corey stated that he has not received any written document stating specifically what Brooklyn Center will receive from this project. Mr. Corey stated that MnDOT has made a lot of commitments, and talks about the Livability Initiative on their website, and that Highway 252 is one of three projects where MnDOT will be working with a Brooklyn Center project team. Mr. Corey has not seen or clearly been told by MnDOT what specific deliverables will be included in the project to fulfill those commitments. Mr. Corey said MnDOT needs to fulfill its commitments with measurable deliverables. He stated that decisions on alternatives to move forward in the EIS access locations in highway overpasses and under have already been made without full consideration of Minnesota Environmental Law, MnDOT commitments, and community needs, and that it is faulty decision-making. This type of decision-making will impede Brooklyn Center's ability to meet its vision. Mr. Corey has been told that a MEPA document will be created when the draft EIS comes out in mid-2026. Given the current way decisions are being made, making changes after the draft EIS release in 2026 to account for MEPA and MnDOT commitments will be difficult, or next to impossible. Decision- making must take into account all project objectives, MEPA, and livability initiative commitments. Mr. Corey continued that there is precedent going up to the Minnesota Supreme Court for environmental law and public engagement to reshape a major infrastructure project. Collaboration in Minnesota laws was key in making I-35E changes to benefit the residents. Recommendations made by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) should push for all tax decision-making to be based on MEPA, NEPA, and all MnDOT commitments. This includes thinking beyond the narrow NEPA transportation-focused purpose and the need to consider broader community impacts that would fall under Minnesota law. Mr. Corey recommended aligning the processes so that design decisions are concurrently based on both MEPA and NEPA. Past decisions may need to be revisited if incompatible with MEPA and or MnDOT commitments. Much like the I-35E project, the City needs to articulate the details of what will meet each MEPA requirement, along with MnDOT commitments. Collaboration is key between the City and MnDOT. Mr. Corey stated Page 19 of 269 9/22/25 -6- DRAFT that Amber Blanchard is the current MnDOT Project Manager, and she has an appreciation of community impact from recently managing the Stone Arch Bridge project. He stated his interactions with her have generally been positive, and collaborative meetings to define specific commitments would be a good next step. Mr. Corey said ideas that City Staff and MnDOT should discuss would be lower speed limits, banning commercial vehicles in green ways that were previously rejected, and should be revisited since there is a precedent. Mr. Corey strongly recommended an initial working document by the end of the year containing details of the specific features and requirements expected to be delivered with this project, for meeting MEPA and MnDOT commitments, and anything less is not acceptable. He reiterated that the City needs those details to make an informed decision on this project and what the best alternative is. Mr. Corey continued that five public engagement-related subcontracts totaling over $588,000 have been executed for this project by the prime contractor, HDR Engineering. He asked if these public engagements are being done to check off NEPA-required process steps or to identify what the community requires. He stated that the City needs to see tangible benefits from this public engagement reflected in the design of this project. Mr. Corey gave a concerning example that the Council should be aware of. The MnDOT decision for Highway 252 to go over the local road at 66th Avenue North, despite public preference being for the highway to go under 66th Avenue North. The interchange distance also violates MnDOT rules in Federal Highway Administration guidelines. There will be increased noise and pollution. The roadway going over will have a negative impact on property values. Another study shows that roadways should not be elevated in urban areas due to adverse effects. Mr. Corey asked if more aggressively applying and adhering to the intent of the Minnesota environmental law would result in better decisions for the City. Mr. Corey continued that MnDOT has stated that congestion on connecting highways will cause congestion for vehicles on Highway 252 on the first day it is completed. Backups on eastbound 694 will limit vehicles entering and exiting Highway 252, and solving congestion resulting from these other roadways is not part of the Highway 252 project. A MnDOT study of Interstate 694 from Shingle Creek to Lexington will likely start in February 2026, with a major rebuild of Interstate 694 anticipated to start in 2032. The Interstate 694 study would be too late to help the Highway 252 project and would likely require more work on parts of Highway 252. Mr. Corey stated that his recommendations are that the decision regarding Highway 252 going over 66th Avenue North be revisited and looked at in a holistic fashion. With so many negatives regarding Highway 252 going over and concerns with property acquisition for Highway 252 to go under 66th Avenue North, the option of no interchange at this location should be reconsidered. Any decision on an interchange at or near 66th Avenue should reflect anticipated changes to Interstate 694 and Highway 100, or the decision should be delayed until planned changes are known, and a temporary solution could be used in the interim. Mr. Corey noted that Brooklyn Center has a vision to shape its future around health, safety, affordability, and cultural preservation, and this project must enhance the community. He stated there are many benefits of public transit using the Highway 252 corridor, including better business and jobs, support for people without cars, less pollution and congestion, and social connections. Page 20 of 269 9/22/25 -7- DRAFT Public transit would connect people to other areas of Brooklyn Center as well. Mr. Corey recommended that the City Council require a clear definition of both Brooklyn Center's minimum acceptable and desired level of public transit, along with a written document from Metro Transit defining what is required to meet those levels of service. A preliminary, written, detailed document of what will be provided should be produced no later than January 31, 2026. Project approval would be contingent on meeting an acceptable transit level of service. Mr. Corey discussed the problem with noise pollution, stating that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency sets noise limits based on land use, time of day, and amount of time. The noise level limits for residential areas are 60 and 65 decibels during the day from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. The nighttime limits are 50 and 55 decibels from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. Many of the homes in Brooklyn Center already exceed the noise limits, and current plans will result in increased noise pollution with MnDOT’s plan to elevate Highway 252, increasing the noise levels even further, resulting in additional residences exceeding noise limits. MnDOT has stated that they do not provide individual home noise abatement. Mr. Corey stated that if general noise mitigation efforts do not reduce noise levels within the Minnesota Pollution Control limits, then individual resident home noise mitigation should be required for homes that are currently expected to exceed the limit. Mr. Corey continued that safety was the number one reason for the Highway 252 project more than 15 years ago. Detailed safety analysis and modeling of alternatives have not been done by MnDOT, with an interchange going over 66th Avenue North that violates Federal Highway Administration safety guidelines. He suggested the City hire an independent analysis by a Safety Traffic Engineer and must not compromise on safety. Mr. Corey concluded that Brooklyn Center has many amenities, including its proximity to the Mississippi River, parks, downtown, and diversity, and all must be enhanced with infrastructure projects. His recommendations, just presented to the Council, will help achieve this goal. He asked if the Council had any questions and stated that other members of the Highway 252 Safety Task Force, such as Bill Newman, would also be available to make some additional comments relating to safety. Bill Newman stated that he was not sure if the audience was aware, but the TAC group had every intention of embracing the Executive Order, and it was only through pressure of the City Council and the Highway 252 Task Force that a May 7 memo was sent back to the Highway 252 Task Force that TAC would consider the environmental justice and equity of the project. He continued that the City cannot assume that MnDOT is going to act in good faith unless the City makes them. He stated that if the City can get MnDOT to commit to MEPA in writing, there is a much better chance for a good outcome of the Highway 252 project. As far as the safety of the project goes, 66th Avenue is the biggest concern. Mr. Newman continued that MnDOT highway design rules require a minimum of 2,000 feet between an on-ramp and off-ramp, and they have been looking at 800 to 1,000 feet for Highway 252, which is absurd. He noted that when the Highway 252 Safety Task Force met with MnDOT in July, MnDOT was claiming that by adding an auxiliary lane and a collector-distributor lane, it models out and is fine to have the on and off-ramps at a closer distance. He explained that the auxiliary lane allows vehicles to get up to speed and match traffic speed to merge, but it shortens the merge distance. He noted that if in that auxiliary lane, Page 21 of 269 9/22/25 -8- DRAFT there would only be 100 to 200 feet to merge, which only allows drivers a few seconds to merge, and that is not safe. Mr. Newman continued This is why it is important to get an independent safety analysis done to look at different interchange location options, and putting an interchange further north of the major system between Highway 252 and Interstate 694 interchange would be in compliance with state and federal design rules and much safer. He said that MnDOT claims they are doing modeling to ensure safety, but have not shown the City anything, and an independent expert would do that analysis and share it with the City. Mr. Newman said he would refer to Mr. Corey if the Council had any questions. Mayor Graves thanked Mr. Corey for his presentation and the comments from Mr. Newman and asked the Council if they had any questions. Councilmember Kragness thanked Mr. Corey and Mr. Newman for their presentation and stated that the Highway 252 Safety Task Force is always very thorough, and she appreciates that. She agreed that MnDOT has not shown the Council anything in writing, and a representative from MnDOT did come and address the Council and speak about core values, but nothing was presented to the Council in writing, and if there is no push to require that, the City probably will not get it. She thanked the Highway 252 Safety Task Force for leading the effort to get documents in writing from MnDOT. Councilmember Moore thanked the Highway 252 Safety Task Force for their presentation and noted that she is not as involved with the Highway 252 Safety Task Force as Mayor Graves and Councilmember Jerzak, but does receive updates on it. She asked if anyone on the Highway 252 Safety Task Force could comment on the reality of the project actually coming to fruition in the next three years, and the dollar amount towards the project. A member of the audience stated that it is really difficult to speculate, and they are all wondering the same thing. Councilmember Moore asked if anyone had an opinion. Mr. Corey stated that right now, there is no money to complete the project. Councilmember Moore thanked Mr. Corey for his response and asked when the City did the corridor on I-35E because she used to work down there. (Member of the public spoke from seat; unable to hear what was being said.) Councilmember Moore said it was completed in the 1980s and asked if he could think of any other examples of work done, because Highway 252 goes through a residential and retail area, and that should be at the forefront of what it can look like, and should look as nice as the corridor down on I-35E does. Councilmember Moore said the I-35E corridor was just an example for today, but she could visualize it, and that corridor has to slow traffic for neighborhoods, businesses, and a parkway. She thanked Mr. Corey for his comments. Mayor Graves thanked the Highway 252 Safety Task Force for all of the work that they have done, and the Council would not be unified in voice and at the point they are now without the Highway Page 22 of 269 9/22/25 -9- DRAFT 252 Safety Task Force and all of the work they have done. She stated that the purpose and need statement is one of the first things the Council tried to change as well, and Brooklyn Park was in on that request as well, and MnDOT refused and continues to refuse to address the issues that mean the most to community members. She stated she appreciates all of the work the Highway 252 Safety Task Force is doing, understands their frustrations, and will continue to advocate and be a voice for them. Councilmember Jerzak stated he wanted to acknowledge Highway 252 fatigue and apologized for things being the way they currently are. He stated the Highway 252 Safety Task Force should not offer their resignation to MnDOT because they will accept it. He continued that when he had asked MnDOT what the benefits of this project are for Brooklyn Center, they have never been able to define them. Brooklyn Center is the most impacted by this project from Minneapolis to Brooklyn Park, but one positive is that Brooklyn Park is in lockstep with Brooklyn Center. One thing to consider is that if Brooklyn Center has to pay its fair share for this project, it would bankrupt the City. He said he feels like MnDOT is asking the City to commit to this project, without acknowledging what the City would actually be committing to, and that is very troubling. From MnDOT’s perspective, they are telling the City they can have any color car as long as it is green; in other words, MnDOT designs it and tells the City they will love it. He admired the tenacity of the Highway 252 Safety Task Force and heard the passion in last week’s meeting he went to with them. He stated he could not promise them anything, but told them to continue their work, and he would echo their legitimate concerns and support their efforts. Mayor Graves thanked the Highway 252 Safety Task Force again and took pictures of all the concise recommendations given to the Council, so if she is ever in a conversation about this topic, she can go back and reference all of them to effectively advocate for all of them. A community member who was present said she was in earlier discussions with the Highway 252 Safety Task Force and is a band member who travels all summer along Highway 10 up to Cass Lake and passes through a tiny town called Royalton that has one red stoplight that causes traffic backups. She noted that somehow Royalton has kept that traffic light there, despite it being problematic. She said she has owned her home in Brooklyn Center for 26 years and will fight with the Highway 252 Safety Task Force for the project. Jeff B. said he was at the meeting that Councilmember Jerzak was referring to earlier, and he had asked Amber Blanchard from MnDOT a question regarding the 45-mile-per-hour speed limit on I-35E, and she did not really give him an answer. He stated Ms. Blanchard responded that the speed limit there is not working. He stated that if a speed limit is not working in a certain area, why is it not changed, and that it is frustrating to hear that. Councilmember Moore moved, and Councilmember Kragness seconded to accept the presentation from the Highway 252 Safety Task Force. Motion passed unanimously. 7b. RETAIL MARKET ANALYSIS AND COMPARATIVE RETAIL NODE STUDY Page 23 of 269 9/22/25 -10- DRAFT Dr. Edwards said this presentation is part of the continuing efforts relating to the City's Economic Growth Plan. Dr. Edwards said Community Development Director Jesse Anderson would introduce the speaker, who is responsible for the study. Community Development Director Jesse Anderson said his Department is finishing up the Economic Growth Plan, and as part of that plan, there was a retail market analysis compared to a node retail study done to analyze the City's retail market and demands. He continued that the report had a lot of interesting data and is 72 pages long, and while all 72 pages would not be presented to the Council, a summary would be presented by Grant Martin from LOCi Consulting. Mr. Martin thanked the Council for having him there and stated that the purpose of this project was to provide commercial real estate market analytics to guide strategic economic development planning in the City of Brooklyn Center. The market analysis includes a site analysis of the general retail nodes, retail areas of Brooklyn Center, a demographic and economic analysis, and a review of the retail real estate market in Brooklyn Center, as well as five comparable retail areas in the Northwest area. The market analysis also includes demand analysis to determine what the demand is for additional retail space in Brooklyn Center, as well as key findings and recommendations. Mr. Martin continued that he would discuss what he thinks will happen in the City of Brooklyn Center over the next five years, so they know what to expect and what some of the challenges or key issues may be. He said his prediction can always change, but his goal is to present the most likely outcome over the next five years. Mr. Martin stated that the study was bound to the Brooklyn Boulevard I-694 and I-94 corridor and the Highway 100 corridor, as this is where the most retail space in the community is. It is where the old Brookdale Mall is located, and the Shingle Creek Crossing redevelopment is occurring. This area, in terms of retail development and how retail developers would look at this, is very connected to the Metro, with transportation corridors on I-94, I-694, and Highway 10 all being well connected with a lot of interchanges, and retailers often look at these aspects as great ways to bring in traffic to the area. Some of the drawbacks with this area are that the primary core of retail is not located where the highest traffic counts are, so some people traveling through the area may not know the Shingle Creek Crossing area is there. Mr. Martin showed a map with some of the major anchors in the area, and vacant spaces, with the area being around 1.4 million square feet and the major anchors being Cub Foods, Sun Foods, and Empire Foods. Anchors are large retailers that drive the most traffic to the area, and in the case of Cub Foods, it is probably generating about 750,000 trips to this area each year, and retailers look for this and want to be close to those anchors. Mr. Martin discussed the comparable retail nodes that he looked at, which included Maple Grove, Brooklyn Park, Crystal, Robbinsdale, and Fridley. He stated he would not go into a lot of detail regarding those comparable nodes, but there is a lot of information regarding them in the report. One of the key things that they look at is driving time, and what the population within 10 minutes of driving time is, and how frequently that population is visiting these retailers. Brooklyn Center is within a 10-minute drive of four of the comparable retail nodes, so they are overlapping and share a lot of the same trade areas. Page 24 of 269 9/22/25 -11- DRAFT Mr. Martin stated that the population and population growth rate for the area are projected from 2025 to 2030, and show a significant decline compared to what has been seen in the last 15 years, and that is due to slowed birth rates and a decline in immigration that is projected to occur in the next five years due to Federal policy. Due to declining growth, retail growth that has occurred in the last 15 years will also slow across the metro area. Mr. Martin stated that retailers often look at median household incomes to understand what the incomes are in the area that includes the 10-minute drive time for the comparative analysis. He stated that he uses a demographic provider that forecasts inflation at 2.4 percent over the next five years, so when a number for the median household growth is below 2.4 percent, it means that incomes are not keeping up with inflation in that area. This discrepancy can be caused by a lot of things; it can be driven by aging populations that move out of higher incomes and start collecting social security or pensions, and their incomes decline. Incomes can also decline because households become smaller, sadly, because maybe a partner or spouse has passed away. When looking at the Brooklyn Center retail node, some declines relative to inflation are projected. The only areas that are expected to see an increase in median household incomes are Brooklyn Park and Maple Grove, and that is probably because there is household growth in those areas. Mr. Martin continued that overall demand for retail space was very strong in 2023 and 2024, new retailers were coming, consumer spending was rebounding post-COVID, and there was some really strong growth. In 2025, things have slowed down, and that is one of the big issues that he is starting to see with vacancy rates going up in retail spaces, and construction of new retail spaces at a historic low. With construction rates being high and interest rates being higher, this has limited new construction, and with almost no new retail supply, vacancies are projected to remain low over the next five years across the metro area. Mr. Martin stated that the Brooklyn Center retail node has about 1.4 million square feet in retail space, whereas Maple Grove has over three million square feet in retail space, and that size difference puts Brooklyn Center at a real disadvantage. This same thing occurred 50 years ago, when Brookdale Mall was developed, and all the retailers came to Brooklyn Center as the retail center because of its proximity to Brookdale Mall. The vacancy rate for Brooklyn Center is also at 10 percent, which is much higher than the metro vacancy rate, which is around 2.5 percent. Mr. Martin said he also talked to brokers to get their thoughts on what is going on in Brooklyn Center, and many brokers said that population density and connectivity are selling points for the area. He stated that there is a rumor in the broker community that the local Walmart closed due to security issues that were making the store unprofitable; however, Mr. Martin said he could not verify that with Walmart or anybody else and wanted to communicate that with the Council. Walmart brought a lot of traffic to the area, and the other tenants in the area might be considering other options elsewhere because they do not have a strong anchor in the area. Market-wide, there is interest in smaller second-generation spaces, especially for discount grocers, discount retailers, and entertainment spaces. There will continue to be demand for retail space from lower-credit local businesses, small restaurants, and convenience businesses. Page 25 of 269 9/22/25 -12- DRAFT Mr. Martin highlighted some key findings for the site analysis and said that Brooklyn Center is well-connected to the transportation network and viable as retail real estate serving the community. The demographic analysis showed that population and household growth are projected to slow over the next five years relative to the previous 15-year period. When inflation is included, household incomes and total consumer expenditure in the trade area are projected to decline slightly over the next five years. The market analysis showed the retail vacancy rate in the Brooklyn Center retail node is much higher than the Minneapolis market, 10 percent versus 2.5 percent, and the published vacancy rate does not include large vacant properties like Sears and Brown College that are not marketed as retail or considered available for lease. The Brooklyn Center retail node has seen positive absorption, meaning new tenants have come in and absorbed space, but there is still a 10 percent vacancy rate. Mr. Martin said other key findings are that the demand for retail space in Brooklyn Center is projected to remain flat between 2025 and 2030, with published vacancy rates at 10 percent and a handful of prominent large vacant boxes; there is still too much retail supply in the market. Retail concentrated along Brooklyn Boulevard and Bass Lake Road will remain the most viable; retail along Shingle Creek Parkway will continue to struggle. The closure of Walmart is a significant loss to the retail node, reducing the overall number of shopping trips to the node and, with that departure and likely lower sales, many high-credit national chains and tenants are expected to consider options to relocate. The loss of national retailers will create opportunities for low-credit, local retailers and entrepreneurs; however, these changes can reduce the overall market value of shopping centers for landlords, because it is easier to sell the property when there is a national retailer nearby. Mr. Martin recommended that the City keep an eye on the vacant properties, as they may start to feel like they are losing value with more local tenants. Mr. Martin said his recommendations are that the City should try to focus its efforts on retaining and attracting retailers to existing spaces, rather than developing new traditional and/or mixed-use retail space. Develop and maintain relationships with shopping center owners to promote national retailer retention and facilitate local business placement. Prioritize retail development and enhancement in the areas along Brooklyn Boulevard and Bass Lake Road that are most likely to continue to support retail. Continue to work with property owners to quickly re-purpose or demolish vacant, obsolete retail space, especially in areas away from Brooklyn Boulevard and Bass Lake Road. Try to enhance small business support programs, as these businesses will become a more significant portion of the retail space occupiers. Focus retention efforts on large, high- traffic anchor retailers, such as maintaining Cub Foods, Sun Foods, and Empire Foods. Mr. Martin asked if the Council had any questions regarding the presentation and the report. Mayor Graves thanked Mr. Martin for his presentation and asked the Council if they had any questions. Councilmember Jerzak thanked Mr. Martin for the comprehensive report and said it confirmed a lot of the obvious for him. He wanted to highlight on page four of 55 with published vacancy rates of 10 percent, when Walmart pulled out, two prominent other businesses were able to adjust their leases so that percentage will go back up when those leases expire. He said there is a slight decline in consumer income, and one of the recommendations that Mr. Martin made, and Councilmember Jerzak said he will be discussing more in private one-on-ones, is how the City retains businesses, as that is easier in this environment than attracting new ones. He asked if any Page 26 of 269 9/22/25 -13- DRAFT efforts were made by the City to reach out to CVS, Denny’s, and BB’s BBQ before they closed, and whether the City is spending as much time reaching out to Sun Foods to try and retain them. He continued that if the City is only able to absorb 400 square feet of retail space a quarter, that is not much because it does not take attrition into account, and that is frightening. Councilmember Jerzak said in his opinion that until his colleagues are willing to seriously address the master plan, which is 10 to 15 years old and includes a lot of retail, then that ship has already sailed. He stated that no one is talking about the Amazon effect either, which is causing the City to see fewer and fewer entrepreneurs. He stated that the Council needs to address the outdated retail plan that they have inherited. He said there is ample evidence of this, with the fact that nothing has really taken off at the Opportunity Site over time, and he believes City Staff is well aware of this, and hopes that Staff is addressing that. He recognized that the City has its challenges and he believes they can be overcome, but he hopes that all City Staff take this comprehensive report to heart when discussing Economic Development in Brooklyn Center. He stated that he does not think most people understand that the work that starts now may not see a direct return for 15 to 20 years and will not be instantaneous. He stated the primary source of revenue for Brooklyn Center, as everyone knows, is property taxes. Councilmember Kragness thanked Mr. Martin for the presentation and said she would be interested in finding out how to bring in new businesses and what that step-by-step process would look like. She said it would also be helpful to know what the City can do to keep businesses in the City. Mr. Martin said those are valid points, but the scope of this project was not to do a deep dive into the City's Economic Development programs, but more to outline and understand the scale of the opportunity that Brooklyn Center has. Once the scale of opportunity is understood, he provides recommendations. He said he thought that is what the Economic Development plan is hoping to achieve, though, and his report is a tool that can be leveraged to help the City do that effectively. Councilmember Kragness thanked Mr. Martin for his remarks and said he made a good point, that this report will be helpful in the City's next steps, and not just a footnote. Mayor Graves asked what strengthening relationships around retention looks like. Mr. Martin said his analysis is more high-level, and that the Economic Development Plan that the City Staff is working on should outline how to do those things with concrete steps on what to do. Mayor Graves said the Council recognized early on that the businesses that were growing in Brooklyn Center were the small businesses, and are trying to lift up programs to support the small businesses, but she wondered if there are ways that the Council could be more supportive in their approach. Mr. Martin responded that the work that is being done through the Economic Development plan process is evaluating best practices to do just that. Mayor Graves told Community Development Director Jesse Anderson to come on up to further elaborate on the Economic Development plan. Mr. Anderson stated that at the next Council meeting, there would be a presentation about the Economic Growth Plan that would cover entrepreneurial efforts, retention and development, as well as trying to incorporate all of the data and information from the Node Retail Study. He stated this study is one piece of the puzzle that is leading towards the efforts of the Economic Growth Plan. Page 27 of 269 9/22/25 -14- DRAFT Mayor Graves asked about the recommendation to quickly get rid of obsolete retail space away from Brooklyn Boulevard and what the reason is. Mr. Martin responded that the way the market has shifted, the most vacant retail space is on the far East side of that district, and the most viable property has been along Brooklyn Boulevard and Bass Lake Road. The recommendation comes from the market organically changing, and most of the vacancies are in one area, versus being peppered around the City. He continued that trying to leverage all those vacancies and make them more viable in one area is going to be really difficult because there is not a lot of demand. Councilmember Moore said she lives two blocks north of the border of Minneapolis on the east side, and she stated she thinks that ship has sailed, unfortunately, especially along the Opportunity Site as a whole, and acknowledged it was a beautiful space at one point. She stated that the City needs to re-strategize what is possible and focus on retention. She said there is an Incubator and a new business that the Department is talking about all the time, but she thinks the focus needs to shift to retention because the Opportunity Site is not doing anything, and Community Development has acknowledged that in presentations earlier this year. She acknowledged that the market has changed for a variety of reasons, and high interest rates are still high. She thanked Mr. Martin for his presentation and said she wanted to take more time to digest the report. Councilmember Jerzak said a lot of this property was built when there was a fair amount of demand for retail. When you organically grow a number of entrepreneurs of smaller businesses, you spread your risks, so if one pulls out, it does not have an incredible impact on other small businesses around them. He acknowledged that the other aspect to consider is that entrepreneurs must have access to space that is affordable, and a lot of that space is not. He said he would not call out people by name, but it is simply not affordable for small businesses, and that has been reported to the Council. He said he knows that the Community Development Department is thinking about this, and he understands the challenges in delivering affordable space that does not have the reputation of being called low-credit and still provides a product that people want to seek out. He said that the City does not need that reputation that oftentimes can come with that type of thinking. He said the City wants a Home Depot, but that is not going to happen, and the emphasis needs to be re-concentrated elsewhere. He gave the example that CVS in Fridley was vacant for many years, and now it is a Krispy Kreme. Now, Brooklyn Center has a vacant CVS building, and the Council can help influence what that building could be used for in innovative ways. He said this would require the Council to get out in the community and ask entrepreneurs what they need and what is working or is not working for their businesses. Mayor Graves said she has never understood why a landlord would prefer to have a vacant space for a prolonged amount of time versus reducing the rent or lease and having the building filled. Mr. Martin said that with some of the triple net buildings, like CVS, they are still receiving rent even when it is closed, so they are not incentivized to rent the building. He said he does not know for sure if that is the case with CVS, but sometimes it is the case when a retailer closes because it is cheaper to pay the rent than it is to operate, so the landlord does not have any incentive to backfill it because they are still getting a rent check. The other problem is that the property may sit vacant because the landlord is waiting to get a national tenant in there, because once they accept a longer- term tenant from a non-national store, there may be a reduction in the property value. He said he Page 28 of 269 9/22/25 -15- DRAFT does not know what the solution is to get a landlord to accept a non-national tenant instead of them waiting it out for a national one. Mayor Graves said Mr. Martin spoke about the reasons Walmart pulled out earlier in the presentation, and it was widely talked about on social media. Although Walmart did not give that reasoning to the Council either, she asked how detrimental commentary like that is to the perceived viability with brokers. Mr. Martin said he thinks brokers are talking about these types of situations nationally, with increases in crime and shrinkage making retail properties difficult to operate, and thinks that there are a lot of valid concerns in that. However, he acknowledged that sometimes stores close and claim it is due to crime, but there may also be a competitor that just opened down the street, and so the reasons for closing may be a little less clear. He noted that the industry is very focused on shrinkage and operating stores profitably right now, as well as crime and organized crime. He said he mentioned it earlier because the City should be aware that perception is out there, but said that perception is in a lot of places. Mayor Graves said she realizes that perception is in a lot of places, but one of the strategic priorities in the past for the Council has been around clean-up campaigns, and public art to address the City's image, and she wondered if that helps influence people to be interested in investing economically in the City. Mr. Martin said those efforts absolutely make a difference and are valuable. He stated he worked for a retailer, and if retailers see the City making significant investments in the area, retailers feel reassured in their investments to build a new store in that area. Councilmember Kragness said she would like to volunteer the City of Brooklyn Center as a team player for Krispy Kreme, as they have a vacant CVS as well, and she would be willing to support it by purchasing. Dr. Edwards seconded that sentiment. Mayor Graves said there has been talk by the American Legion about consideration of the CVS building, as the American Legion needs more space, but she does not know if they have reached out to anyone about it yet. Mr. Anderson added that Community Development has gotten a lot of calls about the CVS building, with people checking zoning, and his gut tells him that it will not be vacant for an extended period of time. He said there have also been conversations with the owner of the Sears building and some progress has been made there, as well as Brown College, which just changed ownership, so things are going in the right direction. Councilmember Kragness moved and Councilmember Moore seconded to approve the presentation on the Retail Market Analysis and Comparative Retail Node Study. Motion passed unanimously. 7c. PROCLAMATION DECLARING SEPTEMBER 15, 2025, TO OCTOBER 15, 2025, AS NATIONAL HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Mayor Graves read in full a proclamation declaring September 15, 2025, to October 15, 2025, as National Hispanic Heritage Month in the City of Brooklyn Center. Page 29 of 269 9/22/25 -16- DRAFT Councilmember Kragness moved and Mayor Graves seconded to accept the PROCLAMATION declaring September 15, 2025, to October 15, 2025, as National Hispanic Heritage Month in the City of Brooklyn Center. Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Graves called for a 10-minute recess at 8:20. Mayor Graves recalled the meeting at 8:30. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS 10a. RESOLUTIONS APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY 2026 PROPERTY TAX LEVY AND PRELIMINARY BUDGET Dr. Edwards said he would be presenting this item with Finance Director Angela Holm. He noted that the purpose of the presentation is to provide an overview of the budget process to provide insight into factors that guided the development of the 2026 preliminary budget, as well as provide fiscal analysis, budget highlights, and impacts. Dr. Edwards said there have been conversations over the last several months around the general direction and landscape of all the City Departments, with presentations from each of them on their budgets, culminating in the presentation tonight, which is the preliminary levy and budget that will be adopted by December 1, 2025. Dr. Edwards said the City's strategic plan is the most important factor that drives the budget and shapes the long-term financial position of the City. He highlighted the City's mission statement, which states the City will provide high-quality, equitable City services that are safe, welcoming, and inclusive to the community and within the vision of the City. Dr. Edwards listed the strategic priorities because they narrow down what the priorities should be for this year, which are to maintain a strong financial position, improve community and employee safety, strengthen and diversify business development and housing, and improve employees' experiences. Dr. Edwards also stated some of the challenges that Brooklyn Center has, which are systemic societal wealth and cost of living, which is outpacing wealth, along with other jurisdictions having tax increases, which do impact how the City Staff thinks about Brooklyn Center's budget in the levy increase. The City has to consider the challenges of an immediate tax burden while also addressing long- term fiscal needs, such as the Central Garage and maintaining a fleet of vehicles. It is also challenging with the past three years of reductions and long-term sustainability regarding those reductions. Some past reductions dictate how the City can move forward as an organization. Dr. Edwards stated that the Retail Study will fold into the Economic Study, but Economic Growth investment is critical to the City. The reduction of operations will be more challenging and is not a viable option due to the reductions that have been made within programs and services. He said Page 30 of 269 9/22/25 -17- DRAFT the City will have to be more innovative and look at some long-term sustainable funding stability options. Dr. Edwards said initially, the levy was at 8.25 percent, but after the Council indicated it wanted to keep the budget tight and as low as possible, the Departments brought that number down to 4.98 percent. Dr. Edwards displayed a slide with the ten other comparable cities and the levy increases those cities are proposing, with Crystal proposing a 15.87 percent increase, Brooklyn Park proposing a 12.50 percent increase, and Maple Grove proposing a 6.35 percent increase. Dr. Edwards said it is worth noting that it is difficult to compare other jurisdictions, and it is not always an apples-to-apples comparison. He said he has engaged with research analysts at Minnesota Compass to model out what Brooklyn Center can afford related to levies and the tax burden to ensure that the City is taxing at an appropriate rate. He said the findings from Minnesota Compass should be available in the next few weeks. Dr. Edwards highlighted Maple Grove's tax levy increase at 6.35 percent, with one percent increase equaling $500,000, whereas Brooklyn Center's one percent increase equals $250,000. The economy in Maple Grove is more robust than Brooklyn Center's, and the population in Maple Grove is twice as large, so there are some trade-offs; it can be difficult to compare, but it does put things into context. Dr. Edwards noted some initial investments the City made and how the levy was decreased from 8.25 percent to 4.98 percent. He explained that no new staff were added, and Departments determined what was needed and what was essential, and no new programs were introduced. He continued that 3 percent went to wages and COLA at $899,014. The City's benefits contribution for City Staff was $55,000. FMLA is required in the state of Minnesota, and the City has to pay for that, which costs $60,907. He continued that Central Garage needed $348,389 to address some of the financial stability issues there, knowing that costs will continue to increase over time, so it is critical that the City positions itself to be able to address large-scale purchases for Central Garage. Another investment of $230,944 went to restoring some of the City's Reserves so that the account does not get depleted. Bonding costs came in at $15,000, and miscellaneous items came in at $290,746. All of these investments came in at a total of $1,900,000, and in order to get down to 4.98 percent, that meant that the budget had to be reduced by $893,000. Dr. Edwards highlighted some of the major reductions and adjustments that had to be made, with the Community Center closing on Sunday, saving $58,762. Delaying cell phone purchases for some employees saved $8,850 and lowered the City's reserve adjustment from 50 percent to 45 percent. He explained that the City already has a higher reserve percentage than the state requires, and he thinks that the City can lower its reserves and still maintain financial integrity and credibility. He said those funds will be used to address one-time issues, such as replenishing the emergency CIP reserve and other high-priced items, such as generators that City facilities need. An amount of $80,000 from those funds will also be used to address some issues, such as refurbishing office spaces. Dr. Edwards said the City could not reduce the budget by $893,000 without addressing some City Staff. He acknowledged that the Staff is the City's greatest asset but is also the most significant expense. He noted that eliminating COLA for part-time City employees saved the City $29,785, and eliminating two vacant positions for future firefighters saved $238,292. He explained that the Page 31 of 269 9/22/25 -18- DRAFT City did not receive the Safer Grant in order to help fund those firefighter positions, but will apply for it again in the future, and address those positions again at that time. A full-time Parks and Recreation Coordinator position was also eliminated to save $90,669. Dr. Edwards said this is the second position in the last couple of years that the Parks and Recreation Department has provided in order to maintain a low levy, and he commended them for doing so. Dr. Edwards spoke to all the Departments and asked each of them to identify at least one full-time position that could be reduced or two part-time positions, which is equivalent to one full-time. The Community Service had two part-time positions that were reduced, saving $62,771. The Artist- in-Residence reduction came to a savings of $11,165. The Artist-in-Residence position was partially grant-funded, and that grant has expired, so the City opted to forego funding their portion of that position and maintain the base funding for that position with funds from the General Fund, and remain under a certain number of hours in order to fund that position. A full-time employee was laid off from the Community Prevention, Health and Safety Department, saving $88,904, and one full-time Administration Communication position was laid off in order to save $98,114. Dr. Edwards said that other miscellaneous reductions equaled $205,840. Dr. Edwards said when looking at reductions, it was important to maintain employee morale, as that pertains to the productivity of employees as well as retention. Dr. Edwards said there was an employee survey done, and it showed that reductions were a significant issue as it relates to morale. Dr. Edwards noted that one of the priorities of the City is the employee experience, so it was critical that this was addressed. When reductions are made, it is imperative to maintain the integrity of the City’s programs and ensure that the reduction does not eliminate a program, so reductions were made across the organization to ensure that not only one program or Department was affected. Dr. Edwards said over the last several years, investments were made in various staffing positions, which resulted in a low levy rate, but the City had to reduce programming in order to offset spending in other areas. Dr. Edwards said that in order to keep the levy low, there cannot be significant funding spent on programs or services. To make reductions now, several positions were frozen or reduced, such as one Parks and Recreation Outreach full-time employee, an Outcome Performance Analyst, as well as programs like the Youth Prevention and Intervention, Brooklyn Boulevard Maintenance, landscaping and park maintenance, and the Park Entertainment and Juneteenth. He noted that the reduction of these programs really impacts the City in services and programs that can be offered at the Community Center. Staff reductions impact morale, productivity, and the quality of the City's services. He noted that some reductions are not prolonged resolutions, such as delaying cell phone purchases and firefighter positions, meaning the City will eventually fund those things, but will delay until it is able to. Dr. Edwards stated that the proposed 2026 levy increase dollar amount totals $1,313,631, which equates to 4.98 percent. He stated that Finance Director Angela Holm would detail more of the budget and levy details. Ms. Holm said that anyone who has been around for a while has seen some of this information already, so she will try to get through it quickly. She stated that budget policies provide a basic framework and assist in the decision-making process. The policy states the budget must be Page 32 of 269 9/22/25 -19- DRAFT balanced, current revenues should pay for current expenses, and the contingency could be up to five percent of the budget, although right now the contingency is very small at $25,000. The budget must provide adequate funding for Capital replacement and maintenance, and the budget should describe goals, services, and programs. Ms. Holm stated the revenue policies that direct how the City maintains the ability to pay for services. The Finance Department is always looking to maintain a diversified and stable revenue system. Annual revenue estimates are completed through an objective, conservative analytical process. Anyone who has a revenue stream is asked to look at that revenue and provide guidance and information on how those amounts were determined. User fees are reviewed and revised on an annual basis. Fees and user charges for Enterprise funds should fully support total direct and indirect costs, and while that is not part of today's discussion, user fees will be established to a level that recovers the City's full cost of providing that service. Ms. Holm continued that when looking at some of the economic conditions of the City, one of the first things that comes to mind is the median home value and since 2008 the median home values have taken a dip, but have steadily increased but in 2025 and 2026, the median home value only went up by about $9,000 from $272,000 to $281,000. In comparison to some of the other surrounding cities, Brooklyn Center is on the lower end, with Golden Valley coming in at the top with a median home value of $447,000. Ms. Holm explained that the reason why there could be such a discrepancy between Golden Valley and Brooklyn Center is that Golden Valley has a very broad range of values in homes. There are a lot of homes in Golden Valley similar to Brooklyn Center homes, and there are a lot of homes there that are dissimilar as well. When there is a large population like that in Golden Valley, it can skew the numbers pretty quickly, and it is a comparison point; it does not mean that every home in Golden Valley is substantially different than Brooklyn Center. She continued that Robbinsdale was nearly flat in median home value with no increase, and Crystal came in just slightly above Brooklyn Center, although Crystal does have a large levy increase that is being predicted this year. Ms. Holm stated another data point that the Finance Department looks at is the taxable market value estimates and the impact of a levy increase. This year, it is not surprising to see that the commercial and industrial values have gone down, as well as apartment values. Residential was really the only one that increased, as well as personal property, although personal property is not something that she would consider a strong data point from a tax levy standpoint. She noted that in 2024 and 2025, the City did see an increase in commercial and industrial tax values, but it is now swinging the other way. Ms. Holm stated that the property tax levy is at an overall increase of 4.98 percent, as stated before, and is determined by looking at the payable 2025 tax levies and the estimated 2026 tax levies. She explained that the HRA levy is actually formula-driven and has a very specific use. Once the City gets it, it is immediately transferred into the EDA for EDA programs. The total dollar change is $1,313,631. Page 33 of 269 9/22/25 -20- DRAFT Ms. Holm displayed a slide that shows an example of how the median property tax value of $1,668 is distributed across the City, with $637.00 of that going to the Police Department, Public Works, Community Development, Fire, general government, and some other more ancillary items. Ms. Holm showed a slide with a 2025 and 2026 taxable market value for a single-family residential home, and that taxable market value is the value with a homestead adjustment on it, so the property is qualified for a homestead adjustment that is calculated into that value with an overall $9,701 increase that equates to 3.88 percent from 2025 to 2026. That tax rate is what drives what the City taxes would be, so the tax rate is the total levy increase divided by the tax capacity, and while she does not generally speak about that percentage a lot, it is what drives the calculation. For this same median value home, the taxes were $1,531 in 2025 and, with the impact of the 4.98 percent levy, would go up by $137 for 2026, coming in at $1,668, and this is the change the homeowner would see. She said this example is important to understand what the tax capacity and tax levies' impact would be for the median homeowner. Ms. Holm highlighted the 2026 budget's next steps, which include a joint City Council and Finance Commission meeting on budgets, utilities, and grant funds on October 20, 2025. On November 3, 2025, another joint City Council and Finance Commission meeting will discuss budget request presentations on Enterprise Funds. On November 10, 2025, a joint City Council and Finance Commission meeting will discuss the utility rates in a public hearing, and on December 1, 2025, a special meeting will occur for the adoption of the 2026 budget and levy. Ms. Holm said that she is requesting that the Council approve a resolution for a preliminary tax capacity levy for the General Fund, Debt Service funds, and a market value levy for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority for property taxes payable in 2026. She is also asking the Council to approve a resolution for a preliminary budget for the 2026 fiscal year. She asked the Council if they had any questions. Mayor Graves thanked Dr. Edwards and Ms. Holm for the presentation and said she would open up to the Council for questions. Councilmember Moore thanked Dr. Edwards and Ms. Holm for the presentation and asked to confirm which handout she received was correct, because two of them are different. Ms. Holm said the handout provided on the dais is the correct one, not the one that was included in the packet. Councilmember Moore said that explains some things. She commended Dr. Edwards for providing direction and support to various Departments in order to trim the levy down to 4.98 percent because she knows that included a lot of difficult decisions. She said in terms of the reductions and adjustments, she agreed that it seems equitable across the Departments; however, the Artist-in-Residence position was kept and only reduced by 0.125. She stated that previous Councilmembers have discussed grant-funded positions and noted that there is no expectation to continue to fund those positions in future years. She stated she is also looking at the fact that the Community Center, which is an icon and asset to the City, is reducing Sunday hours, which also reduces revenue. She said she has had this conversation with Dr. Edwards, and said she cannot support or accept continuing an initial grant-funded position in times when every Department had Page 34 of 269 9/22/25 -21- DRAFT to look at cutting vacant positions, or laying off Staff who have been with the City for a number of years. Councilmember Moore continued that she also will not accept part-time employees not getting a cost-of-living increase, and while she does not know how many employees that affects, she noted that grant-funded position money could cover maybe a few hours of operation for the Community Center on Sundays, or give employees who are committed and working with the City a cost-of- living increase. Councilmember Moore said across the board, there is no equity in terms of wages and benefit increases over time, but Dr. Edwards spoke about equity when it came to reductions. She continued that her question is under Contractual Services on line 6449, and if that Canopy Service is going through June 30 of next year, or what the contract is. Ms. Holm said in the current budget that the Hennepin County Social Worker and Canopy are still grant-funded for the remainder of this year and a portion of 2026. Councilmember Moore said she thought the City had a contribution towards Canopy Services, and it was not 100 percent grant-funded. Dr. Edwards said as far as programming, the City has helped with some initial costs related to computers and office spaces, but it is very limited for the pilot model for Canopy. Councilmember Moore asked if the City also helped with the purchase of a van. Dr. Edwards confirmed that she was correct about the van. Councilmember Moore asked if the 2026 Canopy was all grant-funded. Dr. Edwards said that for half of the year 2026, it was grant-funded. Councilmember Moore asked on page 173 of 188, there is an Office of Prevention, Health and Safety, and then there is a Health and Social Environment with a number of wages, which is an increase because in 2024, there was no budget for that. She asked if anyone could explain what this program is, if there is a person who has a position in that program, and if it is under the Director of the Office of Prevention, Health and Safety. Dr. Edwards said the Health and Social Environment was a former organization and structure within Parks and Recreation that has changed, so names will change, but that is where the Outreach program is funded from and is distinctly different from the office of Prevention, Health, and Safety. Councilmember Moore asked if this includes more than one Outreach worker who is covered under wages, salaries, and full-time employees on that page. Dr. Edwards said it includes one full-time Outreach employee and some part-time employees. Councilmember Moore asked if it would fall under the umbrella of Parks and Recreation. Dr. Edwards said that it is correct. Councilmember Moore thanked him for that clarity. Councilmember Kragness asked to confirm the dates for the meetings on the budget for the next steps. She said she had written down November 3 as a budget meeting, and on November 10, she has that as a regularly scheduled Council meeting, and a joint meeting scheduled for November 17. Dr. Edwards said he would confirm, but currently, he has the meetings scheduled for November 3, November 10, and December 1. Councilmember Kragness asked if there is a meeting scheduled for November 17. Dr. Edwards said he would confirm and get back to her. Councilmember Kragness said she wanted to commend the Staff for acknowledging the request by the Council to keep the levy low, as it was probably uncomfortable to do and took a lot of Page 35 of 269 9/22/25 -22- DRAFT initiative to be creative with the numbers. She stated it is hard to support the Community Center closing on Sunday, as that is family day, and she thinks it is unfortunate to close it on Sunday since it is community-based. She stated that her understanding of the grant-funded Artist-in-Residence position was that the base funding was cut, not that the City is going to continue to fund that, but the City will continue to fund the portion that the City is responsible for. She wanted to make sure she was understanding that correctly. Dr. Edwards said the Artist-in-Residence position is a part- time position and a portion of it was grant-funded, but the City intended to pick up the grant- funded portion with General Fund dollars, and that was always the plan. He continued that five years ago, the plan was to seek grant money to fund something that the City could not afford to do at the time, but over time, it would begin to fund fully on its own. At this time, the City is only able to fund a part-time position, so it was only increased from 20 to 25 hours this year in the budget. Ms. Holm stated that in 2025, the Artist-in-Residence was partially funded by grant dollars from the Public Safety Aid and the General Fund. In 2026, the initial proposal was to make the position entirely funded by the General Fund as a 0.625 position, which equates to 25 hours a week. The proposal in front of the Council reduced that position to a 0.5, which is a reduction of 0.125 or about $11,000, and the position would be entirely funded at a 0.5 by the General Fund for 2026. Councilmember Kragness thanked Ms. Holm for clarifying that. She continued that she understands cutting vacant positions, but she has a hard time supporting the reduction of positions that have people in those positions who are doing their jobs and showing up every day for the City. She said that cutting four part-time Park liaisons will most likely affect the number of complaints the Council gets, and those are things that everyone needs to be thinking about, because if no one is there to maintain order at the Parks, then complaints will go up. She stated that the Youth Prevention and Intervention cost reduction is one of those things that, if it gets cut now, the City will be paying for it later. She does not support a reduction in anything that has to do with prevention, because it prevents expenses from coming to the City in a different form. She stated that the City just got Juneteenth, and now it is already being taken away. Mayor Graves said there was no Juneteenth celebration this year, because it was eliminated in last year's budget. Dr. Edwards said some of the reductions, such as the part-time liaisons, occurred in 2023. He continued that the other cuts that Councilmember Kragness mentioned occurred in 2024 and 2025, so in this case, the slide she was mentioning was just trying to show past reductions. Councilmember Kragness said the City is missing out on the services mentioned that would typically be provided for the citizens. She said she understands it is difficult and she appreciates that the levy is low, but wants everyone to understand what that means, and it is not just a number. She noted everyone wants to pay lower taxes, but it comes at the expense of reducing services that the community should get. She asked if it is fair and equitable to people who show up for work every day and noted that those employees are not just a number. Councilmember Jerzak said he wanted to acknowledge all the hard work the Staff has put into this budget and levy, with competing interests, it is difficult. He noted that Astigo just proposed a 19 percent levy increase, and he is very proud that Brooklyn Center's levy came in as low as 4.98 percent. He continued that he likes to protect jobs, but also has to be realistic, and unfortunately, in uncomfortable cuts that have to be made. He asked about the $290,746 on page four and does Page 36 of 269 9/22/25 -23- DRAFT not want to micromanage, but would like a breakdown of that to ensure equity. He said he supports what his colleagues brought up about closing the Community Center on Sunday as well, and wants to look out for residents with families who want to bring their children to a place that is affordable. He continued that on page five, or what used to be page 132 of 188, he is afraid that the City just kicked that can down the road for the Fire Department, and he understands the justification, but future Councils will have to deal with that. Councilmember Jerzak stated that on page 142 of 188, the travel and mileage at $10,400 and dues and subscriptions are at $57,000, which has been discussed before, but is still not ideal. He stated his other concern is the $68,000 under the City Manager contract, which is for coaching Directors, is a little harder to swallow because, for less than that, the Community Center could be kept open on Sundays. He stated he believes in the competence of the City's Directors, and they were hired because they are competent. He continued that on page 146 of 148, account 6301, if there was an explanation of the actual expenses for the audit and financial services totaling $118,920 in 2025, yet they have served their notice to discontinue service with the City. He noted that last year's budget was $85,000, so the auditor exceeded it by $33,950, and he knows that the City asked the auditor for some additional things, but the 2026 budget has the audit costing $65,000, and he asked how it can cost $20,000 less. He asked if the new audit contract, being cheaper, will contain everything the City wants, and noted that the contract with the new auditor has not even been issued yet. Ms. Holm said as far as the $65,000 goes, Councilmember Jerzak is correct there is no contract with an auditor yet, and she does anticipate the audit will cost around $85,000, however a portion of that is distributed to the City’s Enterprise funds and the $65,000 is the portion that would be applied to the General Fund. Councilmember Jerzak asked about the Other Contractual Services that have increased by $12,000 and what those increases were for, as well as the Human Resources 41810 reduction of $177,551 and the reason behind that. He continued that there was a $400,000 allocation for open or vacant positions, and it looked like that had disappeared from the budget. Ms. Holm said the $400,000 is its own business unit, and so it should be towards the end of the packet in those pages. The Human Resources Department had a placeholder for the Fire Department, and it is probably a combination of a reduction of the firefighter positions and the reduction of a Human Resources employee who was moved over to Communications. Councilmember Jerzak asked to confirm that 6449, with the increase of $42,00, is the Comprehensive Plan that is due and has the associated costs with it that are under Planning and Zoning and were announced before. Ms. Holm nodded that he was correct. Councilmember Jerzak said his final comment is that his colleagues brought up some important points about the community, and he knows that levy increases for residents on fixed incomes is challenging and while the Staff has done a very good job at looking at all the places to save money, he has to echo Councilmember Kragness’s sentiment particularly in servicing the community, saving a dollar cannot be the only answer. He said it is hard for him to justify a contribution from the General Fund of over $155,000 from a non-performing asset, and then closing down the Community Center on Sundays. He said he made a commitment to supporting the 4.98 percent levy increase, and it hurts, but everyone is living in a time when things cost more. He said he does not have the answer to get more services while spending less, and he does not want to micromanage Dr. Edwards. The Page 37 of 269 9/22/25 -24- DRAFT things that have been cut or reduced must have been for good reasons, and just because he does not like something does not mean that it should not be so. Councilmember Moore said she wanted to go back to the Mayor and Council budget on page 142 of 188, 6449 other contractual services, and that it pertained to Common Sense for $46,000, and said that should be eliminated. She continued that she cannot figure out how subscriptions keep going up from $57,000 to $59,000, and if those are actually necessary. She thanked Ms. Holm for clarifying the accounting question that Councilmember Jerzak had asked. She said she has had a lengthy discussion with Dr. Edwards and commended him on his work with the City's Directors, and will continue to have conversations with Dr. Edwards as he will with his Directors. She thanked Dr. Edwards and Ms. Holm for their presentation. Councilmember Jerzak said he had looked at dues and subscriptions, and there are a lot of things that the City almost has to have. By the time he got done sorting it out, a lot of the dues and subscriptions had to do with the ability to have lobbying done on behalf of the City of Brooklyn Center. He said the only budget he can say anything about is the Council budget, and he would be willing to give that portion up in order to keep the Community Center open on Sundays, but that is not his call. He reiterated that the Council’s only job is to give Dr. Edwards a levy dollar figure. Councilmember Kragness said she supports the lower levy, but the Council needs to recognize what the City actually values, and if that is not recognized, it is easy to cut. She gave the example of Common Sense, and the purpose of Common Sense was to create an environment where the Council would learn to work as a team and together, instead of having shouting matches with each other. She said the Council does not have to agree on everything but should be able to talk to each other cordially, and asked how long it took just to get a Code of Respect together. She said that was an asset put into place to help the Council, and if the Council does not value that as an asset, it is easy to get rid of. She stated that continuing education programs are in the position to be cut, along with people, but the City is expecting people to do more, and education and training might be needed to do more. She said these are all things the Council needs to talk about. She said if Dr. Edwards and the Council say they do not believe in additional education, then the City will become stagnant, especially with the resources that the City currently has; no one can continue to go uphill with less. She continued that if they have to lay people off, then the Council needs to make sure that they are doing better as a City to be good stewards of the money that they are entrusted with. Mayor Grvaes said she appreciates all the comments from her fellow Councilmembers and all the work that the Staff has done to bring back a budget that is within a proposed reduction that Councilmembers felt they could live with. She said she was willing to go a lighter higher than 4.98 percent, recognizing that there is a lot of frustration with wages not keeping up with the cost of living and inflation. She agreed with the other Councilmembers that she wished the Community Center did not have to close at all, and questioned if Sunday would be the most appropriate day to do so, since that is when parents are off work and children are out of school. She said she would have liked to know what the revenue and usage were of the Community Center on Sunday, in order to come to that decision. She agreed with Councilmember Kragness about the importance of not laying off employees, especially when thinking about the City's strategic priorities and the Page 38 of 269 9/22/25 -25- DRAFT importance of improving employees' experience and safety. She stated she understands times are tough, but asked what a one percent levy increase would do, and whether that could potentially save the City from having to lay off Staff. She asked if raising the levy by one percent would improve morale and help City Staff feel as though the Council values and invests in employees who implement the things that the Council decides as a governing body. She said she would be willing to go up another percentage, which would only cost the average homeowner $15.00 more per year, in order to hold on to Staff and not create more lay-offs. She said that when the consensus of the Council was to lay off 13 other employees with the closure of Liquor Store #2 earlier this year, that brings the total to 15 employees who were laid off this year alone. She continued that she does not know what kind of message those lay-offs send, but if that were her, she would start wondering if she should move somewhere else. Mayor Graves stated that when she started as the Mayor, the City was hemorrhaging employees, and she just started feeling like employees were getting back to being valued, but due to the Council's fiscal hawkishness, the needle is moving in the other direction. She said the Council has to remember that without employees, the City can not do anything. She reiterated that no one wants to pay taxes, but the local taxes are the most important ones that residents pay. She suggested the levy be raised to 5.98 percent, and asked if the Council would be amenable to that in order to avoid laying off any more City Staff. Councilmember Moore said she wanted to respond regarding the Common Sense program, and said that the contract predates Councilmember Jerzak, Councilmember Kragness, and her. She said she takes offense to the fact that by suggesting cutting Common Sense and reducing the budget by $46,000, it means she does not want to be an adult and work with her colleagues. She said she sees a bigger picture beyond this, the Department Directors were tasked because of Federal, state, county, utility fees, housing, and transportation fees, and said the residents have been taxed to the point of wanting to leave or cannot afford to stay. She stated that it is important to remember that Brooklyn Center is the most financially disadvantaged suburb, according to the numbers, and increasing the levy will have an impact. She acknowledged it was a difficult decision for all Departments to determine lay-offs, but the Departments made those decisions based on the benefit of the City, and budget, not because a few Councilmembers said the residents could not afford an increase. Mayor Graves said she believed that City Staff was following the direction of the consensus of the Council as far as the cuts that were made, and she applauded the Staff for trying to do that in an equitable and fair way across the City enterprise. Mayor Graves said she started on the Council in 2015, and back then, there was no Communications Department, and there was no community engagement department. She said that communications and some community engagement were happening, but there was no intentional space around that. She stated that the Council needs to make sure they are doing a good job communicating and engaging with the community, as well as the communication that needs to happen internally, because otherwise Departments get siloed. All of these things are connected and relate to economic development as well. If residents are not feeling safe, and the City does not get ahead of the narrative that business owners do not want to open shops in the City due to crime, then the Council is doing a disservice to the City economically. Page 39 of 269 9/22/25 -26- DRAFT Mayor Graves continued that spending another $180,000 to hold on to City Staff that are doing critical roles then that is a worthy investment, and she thinks that most households would say paying $15.00 more a year is worth having Staff that are focused on important skills that does affect the amount of money that the City is bringing in to offset the tax burden on residents. She stated that paying for prevention now can prevent problems in the future, such as having safer communities, better communication, and a better narrative around Brooklyn Center, making investors want to come and develop in the City. She stated that the Council cannot act as if all of this only affects a few individuals; it affects all of the City's strategic priorities. She stated that while she is mindful of not adding financial pressure on residents, she believes that if people understood that a small increase could lead to better community engagement, safety, and communication, and that dedicated individuals within the City and Council are working in the public’s best interest, they would be willing to support it, especially since the cost is less than a tank of gas. She said she is trying to make a case and realizes she is only one vote, but she does not think a lot of people would disagree with her. Councilmember Jerzak said the $15.00 is not the issue; it is the proposed possible double-digit tax increase from the county, along with inflation and tariffs, homeowner's insurance that has doubled, utilities that are increasing, and so on. He continued that one of the strategic priorities is financial sustainability and responsibility, and the Council has to balance those. He said he was one of the Councilmembers who wanted a zero percent levy increase, and in the spirit of cooperation and discussions with Dr. Edwards, he saw the merits in the increase of 4.98 percent, but could not support anything more than that. He said he would not speak for Councilmember Lawrence- Anderson, who was absent, but she had said in past meetings that the City needed to get back to basics. Mayor Graves said she is grateful that Councilmember Jerzak did not stick to his zero percent levy, because the City would be looking at losing a lot more people. Councilmember Jerzak said he had those conversations with Dr. Edwards, and he gave his word at 4.98 percent. It hurts, but during the pandemic, the City had to lay off 100 employees, and some of those people were colleagues of his. He suspected that no matter what the Council would say, there would be a counter to it. He said he would stick with the 4.98 percent increase, but could not support any higher, and wanted to advocate for those on a fixed income who do not have a voice at the dais. Councilmember Kragness said that a zero percent increase is not even realistic; there is COLA, and maintaining the cost of living would require an increase in itself, so a zero percent increase was never really an option. She said she was voicing the things that she does not support, but also wanted to commend and recognize that those were tough decisions that Dr. Edwards and Staff had to make, and she knows it was not easy. She said it is unfortunate to lose those resources, but knows it costs money to run a City. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded to approve the RESOLUTION approving the Preliminary 2026 Property Tax Levy for the General Fund, and Debt Service Funds, and the Market Value Levy for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority for Property Taxes payable in 2026. Page 40 of 269 9/22/25 -27- DRAFT Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Moore seconded to approve the RESOLUTION for the Preliminary Budget for the 2026 Fiscal Year. Motion passed unanimously. 10b. RESOLUTION AMENDING CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF THE STAY OF REVOCATION OF THE HOSPITALITY ACCOMMODATION LICENSE FOR BC SEVA LLC DBA SUBURBAN STUDIOS Dr. Edwards explained that back when the Council had issued a revocation of the Hospitality Accommodation for BC Seva LLC and Suburban Studios, there were certain conditions that were stipulated in order to maintain that Hospitality License. In recent conversations with BC Seva LLC and Suburban Studios, there seems to be an issue related to unannounced inspections, which is a point of difficulty for the group of people who are staying at the Hotel. He continued that the request was to have unannounced inspections of common areas, spaces outside of rooms, and rooms that do not have people staying in them, and a 24-hour notice for anyone who is staying within a room. This would require a change in the resolution in order to make those changes. Dr. Edwards said City Staff thought the Council would be amenable to that, to ensure that the property is still in compliance with the Hospitality License. Dr. Edwards asked Ms. Tolar if she had anything to add. Ms. Tolar said another point is to try to stay in line with the existing plan; there needs to be a development agreement, and the Hospitality Accommodation Ordinance defines Hospitality Accommodation as something for 30 days or less. The existing PUD for the property allows for an extended stay hotel, which, in the solution, can be up to 60 days, so there is a conflict there. To resolve that conflict, the Hotel needs to comply with the PUD and all other license requirements. Mayor Graves asked if there were any questions from Councilmembers. Councilmember Kragness asked Ms. Tolar to repeat what she said so the Council could confirm. Ms. Tolar said there needed to be two amendments to the conditions for the stay of the Hospitality Accommodation revocation, the first being unannounced inspections need to be modified to allow for a 24 hour written notice for occupied rooms or emergency inspections can be done right away, and secondly that Suburban Studios strictly adhere to their planning and development agreement pursuant to the zoning code and the Hospitality Accommodation license. Councilmember Jerzak said he read through this thoroughly and saw it more as a clean-up of a current understanding, and would not have any problem or objections to moving forward. Councilmember Kragness said she understands the language around the notice of 24 hours, but anyone who has in-laws knows that you can get your house in order in 24 hours, and if someone is doing something they should not be doing, it gives them time to get things in order. She said Page 41 of 269 9/22/25 -28- DRAFT she wanted to note that she would be voting against this, and was not here for the initial vote on the stay of revocation, but she did not support it then and does not support the changes now to make it even more flexible. Councilmember Moore asked if, since the revocation went into place in July, there have been 24- hour written notices given or emergency inspections. Ms. Tolar said she does not know what kind of inspections have taken place, but the owner is trying to work with City Inspectors to make sure that everything is cleaned up and under control. Councilmember Moore asked if the change in the resolution was a request made by Suburban Studios. Dr. Edwards said that it is correct, the 24-hour notice for inspections was something that was requested by Suburban Studios, and the second issue, to adhere to the license itself, is something the Council needs to maintain. Councilmember Moore asked if there have been any concerns regarding a 24-hour notice or emergency inspections at the Hotel. Dr. Edwards said there have not been any concerns that he is aware of, and he has spoken to City Staff, and nothing has arisen. Councilmember Jerzak said it is a courtesy to give notice, particularly for those who may be vulnerable, for example, members of the Indigenous Nations who have a lot of problems with male inspectors; it gives them time to find an alternative place to be during the inspections. He said he completely understands and supports this, and there is still an ability to enter for an emergency, and it is more of a clean-up of language. Ms. Tolar said that Councilmember Jerzak is correct, this only amends two of the conditions, there are still many conditions remaining, and if the Suburban Studios owner or Staff violates this, their Hospitality Accommodation license will be revoked, so there are still safeguards in place for the City to manage this. Councilmember Kragness said that the proposal is to give notice, and that would give notice to someone who has shown they will operate with a license improperly. She continued that not giving prior notice to them would discourage someone from following the rules. Mayor Graves said she does not disagree with Councilmember Kragness’s statements, and giving notice to people does give them a chance to clean up things that maybe they should not be doing, but there also has to be balance, and inspectors can still go in without notice to any other space. She stated that it is important to hold accountable the entity that is running the business, and still respecting the people who have paid for rooms that have nothing to do with the owner. She stated that if City Staff says they are not concerned about being able to make sure that the Hotel is adhering to the requirements of the stay of revocation, then she trusts City Staff that that is the case. Councilmember Jerzak said the primary cause of the action started with a non-performing enunciator, which is a sprinkler or warning system for a fire. He said there are obvious reasons the City Staff is asking for this, and he trusts their judgment. Page 42 of 269 9/22/25 -29- DRAFT Councilmember Jerzak moved and Mayor Graves seconded to approve the Resolution Amending Certain Conditions of the Stay of Revocation for the Hospitality Accommodation License for BC Seva LLC DBA Suburban Studios. Councilmember Kragness voted against the same. Motion passed. 11. CLOSED SESSION COUNCIL - ATTORNEY DISCUSSION Mayor Graves said she would entertain a motion to close a portion of this meeting to discuss ongoing litigation and potential settlement options. Ms. Tolar said this portion of the meeting is to conduct a closed session pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 13D.05, Subd. 3(b) to discuss ongoing litigation and potential settlement options. Suburban Studios filed a lawsuit against the City on July 8, 2025, appealing the City’s decision to revoke their Hospitality Accommodation License. Suburban Studios' appeal alleges that the City's decision to revoke Suburban Studios' Hospitality Accommodation licenses was arbitrary, capricious, and not based on substantial evidence, among other bases. Litigation has been pending and ongoing since that time. On September 4, 2025, Suburban Studios communicated with the City's Attorneys regarding a possible visible resolution or settlement to this matter, which may also include discussions regarding litigation strategy. The situation requires a candid and open discussion between the City Council and the City Attorneys without the presence of potential litigants, and for these reasons, the purpose is served by the Attorney- Client privilege against those served by the open meeting law, which dictates the need for absolute confidentiality. The closed session will be limited to the scope of the litigation and potential resolution or settlement. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded to close the Open Session pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 13D.05, Subd. 3(b) for an attorney-client protected discussion with the City Attorney to discuss ongoing litigation and potential settlement options pertaining to BC Seva LLC, Suburban Studios, and the Hospitality Accommodation license revocation. Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded to close the Closed Session. Motion passed unanimously. 12. COUNCIL REPORT Councilmember Kragness reported on her attendance at the following events and provided information on the following upcoming events: • Went to the Public Works Open House. • Went to the NAACP Dinner at the Heritage Center, and there was a lot of praise for the food from MinTahoe. • There is a meeting on Wednesday, September 24, 2025, in the Evergreen neighborhood. Page 43 of 269 9/22/25 -30- DRAFT Councilmember Jerzak reported on his attendance at the following events and provided information on the following upcoming events: • Went to the Highway 252 Safety Task Force meeting. • Went to both of the Chief Walks through Centennial Park. Councilmember Moore moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded to suspend the rules and allow the meeting to continue past 10:00 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Moore reported on his attendance at the following events and provided information on the following upcoming events: • Councilmember Moore thanked Councilmember Kragness for reminding everyone of the Evergreen meeting, which is the last one of the year, at 7112 Bryant Avenue North. • There is a Pancakes and Fire Trucks event at Living Christ Mission Church at 6500 Dupont East Fire Station on Saturday, September 27, 2025, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. • There is Faith in Blue Pancakes at Living Christ Mission Church with the Police Department at 1200 69th Avenue North on Saturday, September 27, 2025, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. 13. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Graves moved and Councilmember Kragness seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 10:23 pm. Motion passed unanimously. Page 44 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: THROUGH: BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Approval of Licenses Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve the licenses as presented. Background: The following businesses/persons have applied for City licenses as noted. Each business/person has fulfilled the requirements of the City Ordinance governing respective licenses, submitted appropriate applications, and paid proper fees. Applicants for rental dwelling licenses are in compliance with Chapter 12 of the City Code of Ordinances unless comments are noted below the property address on the attached rental report. Mechanical Lund Heating and Cooling 4820 County Rd 35 W, Buffalo 55313 Plumbing Restoration & Services 889 Pierce Butler Route, St. Paul 55404 The Fireplace Guys 680 Hale Ave N, Suite 110, Oakdale 55128 Thelen Plumbing Heating & Air 19950 177th St., Suite 650, Big Lake Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Rental Criteria Page 45 of 269 2. For Council Approval 10.13.25 FOR COUNCIL 9.8 to 9.30 Page 46 of 269 Page 2 of 2 b.Police Service Calls. Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12-911, and events categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, auto theft and arson. Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the victim and suspect are “Family or household members” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (b) and where there is a report of “Domestic Abuse” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (a). License Category Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Service & Part I Crimes (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category Impact 1-2 0-1 3-4 units 0-0.25 5 or more units 0-0.35 Decrease 1 Category 1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 3-4 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 Categories 1-2 Greater than 3 3-4 units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria License Category (Based on Property Code Only) Number of Units Property Code Violations per Inspected Unit Type I – 3 Year 1-2 units 0-2 3+ units 0-0.75 Type II – 2 Year 1-2 units Greater than 2 but not more than 5 3+ units Greater than 0.75 but not more than 1.5 Type III – 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 5 but not more than 9 3+ units Greater than 1.5 but not more than 3 Type IV – 6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 9 3+ units Greater than 3 Page 47 of 269 Lo c a t i o n A d d r e s s L i c e n s e S u b t y p e R e n e w a l / I n i t i a l O w n e r Pr o p e r t y Co d e Vi o l a t i o n s Li c e n s e Ty p e P o l i c e C F S * Fi n a l Li c e n e s e Ty p e * * Pr e v i o u s Li c e n s e Ty p e * * * Co n s e c u t i v e Ty p e I V ' s 54 1 2 F r e m o n t A v e N T w o F a m i l y I n i t i a l L e n i n C a r d e n a s D u e n a s 1 0 T y p e I V N / A T y p e I V N / A N / A 24 0 6 E r i c o n D r S i n g l e I n i t i a l M A S O N G R O U P O N E L L C 8 T y p e I I I N / A T y p e I I I N / A N / A 56 4 2 D u p o n t A v e N S i n g l e I n i t i a l C K N C H O M E S L L C 9 T y p e I I I N / A T y p e I I I N / A N / A 60 1 2 B e a r d A v e N S i n g l e I n i t i a l T h o m a s D a n n e r 9 T y p e I I I N / A T y p e I I I N / A N / A 68 3 1 D u p o n t A v e N S i n g l e I n i t i a l S c h y n a e M a n w a 4 T y p e I I N / A T y p e I I N / A N / A 12 0 1 5 7 t h A v e N Mu l t i p l e F a m i l y 1 B l d g 4 U n i t s R e n e w a l Ed w a r d L D o l l & W i f e Me t R e q u i r e m e n t s 2 T y p e I 0 T y p e I T y p e I V N / A 39 0 7 6 5 t h A v e N Mu l t i p l e F a m i l y 3 B l d g s 5 3 U n i t s R e n e w a l GR A N I T E P R O P E R T I E S S P E Di d n o t m e e t r e q u i r e m e n t s 85 = 1 . 6 p e r un i t T y p e I I I 0 T y p e I V T y p e I V 2 48 1 9 A z e l i a A v e N Mu l t i p l e F a m i l y 1 B l d g 1 1 U n i t s R e n e w a l T h i r d S t r e e t / a z e l i a P r o p L l c 4 = 0 . 3 6 p e r un i t T y p e I 0 T y p e I I T y p e I I N / A 13 0 0 7 2 n d A v e N S i n g l e R e n e w a l Sc o t t & M a r i n e l a S e l s e t h Di d n o t m e e t r e q u i r e m e n t s 2 T y p e I 0 T y p e I I I T y p e I I I N / A 13 0 4 6 8 t h L a N S i n g l e R e n e w a l C r y s t a l A D o p p 1 T y p e I 0 T y p e I T y p e I N / A 21 1 4 7 0 t h A v e N S i n g l e R e n e w a l D e n n i s R M e j i a / g l o r i a M e j i a 4 T y p e I I 0 T y p e I I T y p e I I N / A 21 1 8 E r i c o n D r S i n g l e R e n e w a l Ma r c o P a n o r a Di d n o t m e e t r e q u i r e m e n t s 4 T y p e I I 0 T y p e I V T y p e I V 5 31 0 6 6 4 t h A v e N S i n g l e R e n e w a l I H 2 P R O P E R T Y B O R R O W E R L P 4 T y p e I I 0 T y p e I I I T y p e I I I N / A 54 0 0 Q u e e n A v e N S i n g l e R e n e w a l P r o s p e r o u s P r o p e r t y L l c 0 T y p e I 0 T y p e I T y p e I N / A 54 1 6 F r e m o n t A v e N S i n g l e R e n e w a l L u i s a N N a r v a e z 3 0 T y p e I V 0 T y p e I V T y p e I I 0 55 0 5 L y n d a l e A v e N S i n g l e R e n e w a l B r e t t R H i l d r e t h 0 T y p e I 0 T y p e I T y p e I N / A 55 0 6 J u d y L a S i n g l e R e n e w a l P r o s p e r o u s P r o p e r t y L l c 0 T y p e I 0 T y p e I T y p e I I N / A 55 1 0 F r a n c e A v e N S i n g l e R e n e w a l Ia s i s I L l c Me t R e q u i r e m e n t s 9 T y p e I I I 0 T y p e I I I T y p e I I I N / A Re n t a l L i c e n s e s f o r C o u n c i l A p p r o v a l 1 0 . 1 3 . 2 5 Pa g e 4 8 o f 2 6 9 57 1 2 L o g a n A v e N S i n g l e R e n e w a l P e n r o d L L C 0 T y p e I 0 T y p e I T y p e I V N / A 58 4 1 X e r x e s A v e N S i n g l e R e n e w a l Sh e n g Z h e n g Me t R e q u i r e m e n t s 8 T y p e I I I 0 T y p e I I I T y p e I V N / A 59 5 6 B e a r d A v e N S i n g l e R e n e w a l SF R B O R R O W E R 2 0 2 1 - 2 L L C Di d n o t m e e t r e q u i r e m e n t s 1 0 T y p e I V 0 T y p e I V T y p e I V 2 67 0 6 S c o t t A v e N S i n g l e R e n e w a l Gr e e n J a c k e t L L C Me t R e q u i r e m e n t s 0 T y p e I 0 T y p e I T y p e I V N / A 69 3 6 U n i t y A v e N S i n g l e R e n e w a l P a u l R J o h n s o n 0 T y p e I 0 T y p e I T y p e I I N / A 70 2 5 G r i m e s A v e N S i n g l e R e n e w a l SF R A C Q U I S I T I O N S 3 L L C Me t R e q u i r e m e n t s 5 T y p e I I 0 T y p e I I T y p e I V N / A *C F S = C a l l s f o r s e r v i c e f o r r e n e w a l l i c e n s e s o n l y ( I n i t i a l l i c e n s e s a r e n o t a p p l i c a b l e t o C F S a n d w i l l b e l i s t e d a s N / A ) ** L i c e n s e t y p e b e i n g i s s u e d ** * I n i t i a l l i c e n s e s w i l l n o t s h o w a p r e v i o u s T y p e I = 3 y e a r , T y p e I I = 3 y e a r , T y p e I I I = 1 y e a r , T y p e I V = 6 m o n t h s Al l p r o p e r t i e s a r e c u r r e n t o n C i t y u t i l i t i e s a n d t a x e s Pa g e 4 9 o f 2 6 9 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Reggie Edwards, City Manager THROUGH: BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Approving the City of Brooklyn Center City Council Code of Respect Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve the Resolution Adopting the City Council Code of Respect and Ethics Background: The City Council discussed at its study sessions throughout 2024 and 2025 the issue of adopting a City Council Code of Respect and Ethics (see attached) to better address Council interactions and behavior between Council Members, the Public, and the Media. The City Council previously adopted the City Council Code of Policies (“Code of Policies”) to address various items related to how the City Council conducts its business. The City Council Code of Respect and Ethics will be incorporated into the City Code of Policies as Section VIII (numerical assignment subject to future revision) and will include in-depth guidance for the City Council regarding behavior in and outside of Council Meetings, Ethics, and provides accountability measures for Council Members. The City Council determines it is in the City’s best interests to amend the City Code of Policies to include the City Council Code of Respect and Ethics to provide additional context and guidance on how the City Council can best exemplify the values of the City and model respectful interactions in the face of disagreement and discord. The City Council Code of Respect and Ethics will serve as a positive tool to maintain camaraderie, collaboration, and to assist the City Council in executing the business of the City. Attached is a copy of the City Council Code of Respect and Ethics and the authorizing resolution. Budget Issues: Page 50 of 269 NA Inclusive Community Engagement: Inclusive of all Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Applicable to all Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2025- City Council Code of Respect 2. Brooklyn_Center_City_Council_Code_of_Respect_and_Ethics Page 51 of 269 BR291-4-1044330.v1 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-___ RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY COUNCIL CODE OF RESPECT AND ETHICS WHEREAS, the City Council discussed at its study sessions throughout 2024 and 2025 the issue of adopting a City Council Code of Respect and Ethics to better address Council interactions and behavior between Council Members, the Public, and the Media; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously adopted the City Council Code of Policies (“Code of Policies”) to address various items related to how the City Council conducts its business; and WHEREAS, the City Council Code of Respect and Ethics will be incorporated into the City Code of Policies as Section VIII (numerical assignment subject to future revision) and will include in-depth guidance for the City Council regarding behavior in and outside of Council Meetings, Ethics, and provides accountability measures for Council Members; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines it is in the City’s best interests to amend the City Code of Policies to include the City Council Code of Respect and Ethics to provide additional context and guidance on how the City Council can best exemplify the values of the City and model respectful interactions in the face of disagreement and discord; and WHEREAS, the City Council Code of Respect and Ethics will serve as a positive tool to maintain camaraderie, collaboration, and to assist the City Council in executing the business of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center as follows: 1. The City Council Code of Respect and Ethics is hereby adopted in its substantial form, subject to future amendments as directed by Council and non-substantive updates by City Staff. 2. The City Code of Policies is hereby amended by adding the City Council Code of Respect and Ethics, attached as Exhibit A hereto, which is incorporated in and made part of this Resolution. 3. The City Manager and staff are authorized and directed to insert the new Section VIII into the City Code of Policies, and said updated document shall constitute the official Code of Policies. Page 52 of 269 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 53 of 269 EXHIBIT A Page 54 of 269 1 BR291-4-982190.v9 Brooklyn Center City Council Code of Respect and Ethics Table of Contents Brooklyn Center City Council Code of Respect and Ethics .......................................................................2 A. Council Conduct with One Another ............................................................................................2 1. In Public Meetings ....................................................................................................................2 2. In Private Encounters ...............................................................................................................3 B. Council Conduct with City Staff ...................................................................................................4 C. Council Conduct with the Public .................................................................................................5 1. In Public Meetings ....................................................................................................................5 2. In Unofficial Settings ................................................................................................................6 D. Council Conduct with the Media .................................................................................................7 E. Council Conduct with Other Public Agencies ..............................................................................7 F. Council Conduct with Boards and Commissions .........................................................................8 G. Accountability Measures .........................................................................................................9 1. Types of Accountability Measures ...........................................................................................9 2. Conduct ....................................................................................................................................9 CODE OF RESPECT VIOLATION GRID .............................................................................................10 3. Conduct During Meetings ......................................................................................................12 4. Reporting a Potential Violation ..............................................................................................12 5. Alternative Reporting .............................................................................................................12 6. Investigation Procedure .........................................................................................................12 H. Ethics ......................................................................................................................................13 1. Open Meeting Law .................................................................................................................13 2. Gift Law ..................................................................................................................................13 3. Conflict of interest ..................................................................................................................14 Page 55 of 269 2 Brooklyn Center City Council Code of Respect and Ethics A. Council Conduct with One Another Councils are composed of individuals with a wide variety of backgrounds, personalities, values, opinions, and goals. Despite this diversity, all have chosen to serve in public office in order to preserve and protect the present and the future of the community. In all cases, this common goal should be acknowledged even as Council may "agree to disagree" on contentious issues. 1. In Public Meetings (a) Council Member Interaction. Council Members agree to practice civility, professionalism and decorum in discussions and debate. Difficult questions, tough challenges to a particular point of view, and criticism of ideas and information are legitimate elements of a free democracy in action. Council Members can promote camaraderie and collaboration by refraining from making belligerent, personal, impertinent, slanderous, threatening, abusive, or disparaging comments. Shouting or physical actions that could be construed as threatening will not be tolerated. Council Members should make every effort to conduct themselves in a professional manner at all times, including listening actively during Council meetings. (b) Deference to Order. Council Members agree to honor the role of the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or Acting Mayor Pro Tem in maintaining order by deferring to their direction and guidance. It is the responsibility of the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or Acting Mayor Pro Tem to keep the comments of Council Members on track during public meetings. Council Members agree to honor efforts by the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or Acting Mayor Pro Tem to focus discussion on current agenda items. If there is disagreement about the agenda or the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or Acting Mayor Pro Tem’s actions, those objections should be voiced politely and with reason, following procedures outlined in parliamentary procedure. (c) Setting a Positive Example. One prominent goal of every council meeting should be to demonstrate a positive example of decorum and respect for constituents. To accomplish that goal, Council Members agree to avoid comments that personally attack other Council Members. If a Council Member is personally attacked by the comments of another Council Member, the offended Council Member will make notes of the actual words used and may call for a "point of order" to challenge the other Council Member to justify or apologize for the language used. The Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or Acting Mayor Pro Tem will maintain control of this discussion. (d) Collaborative Problem Solving. Another goal of the council meeting is to demonstrate effective problem-solving approaches. Council Members have a responsibility to show how individuals with disparate points of view can find common ground and seek a compromise that benefits the community as a whole. Page 56 of 269 3 (e) Timeliness. To ensure smooth and timely execution of each council meeting, Council Members agree to make best efforts to be punctual and keep comments relative to topics discussed. Every Council Member has made a commitment to attend meetings and participate in discussions. Therefore, it is important that Council Members be punctual and that meetings start on time. It is equally important that discussions on issues be relative to the topic at hand to allow adequate time to fully discuss scheduled issues. (f) Endorsement of Candidates. Council Members have the right to endorse candidates for all Council seats or other elected offices. It is inappropriate to mention endorsements during Council meetings or other official City meetings or functions. (g) Council Decisions. Once a majority decision of the governing body has been made, Council Members should endeavor to “speak with one voice,” respect the official position of the Council, and defend it if needed. (h) Professional Courtesy. Council Members endeavor to avoid putting colleagues in awkward or disadvantageous positions in an effort to capitalize on another colleagues’ vulnerability or to embarrass them publicly. Council Members agree to make every attempt to submit questions or concerns prior to formal meetings to surprising Council Members or staff at said meetings. (i) Avoid Personal Attacks. Council Members shall not personally attack, under any circumstance, another member of Council. Council Members acknowledge that cultural differences, body language, tone of voice, as well as the words they use, could be experienced as intimidating, off-putting, or aggressive to the message recipient. 2. In Private Encounters (a) Respectful Workplace Values. Council Members agree to continue to model respectful behavior in private. The same level of respect and consideration of differing points of view that are deemed appropriate for public discussions should be maintained in private conversations. (b) Data Practices. Council Members recognize that written notes, voicemail messages, social media and email may be public information. Technology allows words written or said without much forethought to be distributed wide and far. Council Members agree to consider the following examples: (1) how they, their family and/or friends would feel if a voicemail message was played on a speaker phone in a full office? Or broadcast on the nightly news; (2) What are the potential consequences if this email message was forwarded to others? Council Members agree that written notes, social media postings, voicemail messages and email should be treated as potentially “public” communication. (c) Public-Private Considerations. Even private conversations can have a public presence. Elected officials are always on display – their actions, mannerisms, and language are monitored by people around them that they may not know. Lunch table conversations could be overheard, parking lot debates may be watched, and casual comments between individuals before and after public meetings noted. Page 57 of 269 4 (d) Personal Comments. Council Members agree to refrain from making personal comments about other Council Members. It is acceptable to publicly disagree about an issue, but it is unacceptable to make derogatory comments about other Council Members, their opinions and actions. B. Council Conduct with City Staff The relationship between Council Members and administrative personnel is dependent on the form of government. Governance of the City is a cooperative effort, including elected officials, who set policy, and City staff, who implement and administer the Council’s policies. Therefore, every effort should be made to be cooperative and show mutual respect for the contributions made by each individual for the good of the community. Council Members will be careful to restrict that relationship to the defined channels. Unofficial Council interference in administrative affairs can disrupt business, weaken employee morale, and create antagonistic relationships between administrators and Council Members. Council Members should not attempt to exert any influence over the hiring and firing of administrative personnel, except for those people whose appointment they are responsible, namely the City Manager, City Attorney, and City Prosecutor. Federal, State, and local laws have made personnel administration a very complex affair, with mishandlings costing public employers hundreds of thousands of dollars in litigation, claims, and damages. The City of Brooklyn Center has a very strong commitment to providing its employees with a fair, accountable, and uniform system of personnel administration including procedures to address employee grievances. 1. Respectful Workplace Values. Council Members agree to treat all staff as professionals. Council Members agree to engage in clear, honest communication that respects the abilities, experience, expertise, and dignity of each individual. Berating, personal, impertinent, slanderous, threatening, abusive, or disparaging comments toward staff are not acceptable and are automatic grounds for a code of conduct violation. 2. Limited City Staff Contact. Pursuant to Brooklyn Center Charter Section 6.02, Council Members must limit contact with City staff. Questions of City staff and/or requests for additional background information should be directed to the City Manager or City Attorney. Council Members agree to copy the City Manager on or informed of any request. Except in extraordinary circumstances, Council Members agree to avoid disrupting City staff while they are in meetings, on the phone, or engrossed in performing their job functions. 3. Council Direction to staff. In accordance with Charter Section 2.09, individual Council Members cannot give direction to City staff either publicly or privately. The Council as a body may provide staff direction on matters that come before the Council. 4. Follow-up Requests or Directives. Council Member acknowledge that requests for follow-up or directions to staff should be made only through the City Manager or the City Attorney when appropriate. When in doubt about what staff contact is appropriate, Council Members will consult with the City Manager. Additionally, Council Members agree that requests for additional staff support – even in high priority or emergency situations – will be made to the City Manager who will work to allocate city Page 58 of 269 5 resources. Materials supplied to a Council Member in response to a request for information of interest to all Council Members will be made available to the entire Council so that all have equal access to the information. Limit requests for staff support. (see Brooklyn Center City Charter Section 2.09). 5. Staff Criticism. Council Members should not publicly criticize City Staff. Council Members agree to express concerns about the performance of a City staff person directly to the City Manager through private correspondence or conversation. Council Members will refrain from expressing concerns in public, to City Staff directly, or to the City staff person’s manager. 6. City Administrative Functions. Pursuant to Section 6.02 of the City Charter, the administrative functions of the City are the responsibility of the City Manager. To avoid the appearance of bias or to avoid violating the ethics code, Council Members will not attempt to influence City staff on the making of employment or personnel decisions, the awarding of contracts, the selecting of consultants, the processing of development applications, or the granting of City licenses and permits. 7. City Staff Meetings. If City Council Members desire to attend a staff meeting, Council Members agree to consult with the City Manager. Council Member attendance at meetings could imply support, show partiality, intimidate staff, and could impede staff’s ability to do their job objectively/effectively. 8. Political Solicitation. Council Members will not solicit any type of political support (i.e., financial contributions, display of posters or lawn signs, name on support list, etc.) from City staff. 9. Council, EDA and Commission agendas. Staff’s responsibility is to provide Council Members with the information needed for informed decision making. Council Members agree to make every effort to ask staff questions regarding Council, EDA and commission agendas before the meeting. 10. Personal Comments about other Council Members. Council Members agree to refrain from speaking ill of other Council Members to staff. This puts staff in an uncomfortable and compromising position because staff have the responsibility to treat all Council Members equally and with respect. 11. Avoid Personal Attacks. Council Members shall not personally attack, under any circumstance, a member of city staff. Council Members acknowledge that cultural differences, body language, tone of voice, as well as the words they use, could be experienced as intimidating, off-putting, or aggressive to the message recipient. C. Council Conduct with the Public 1. In Public Meetings (a) Create a Welcoming Environment. Making the public feel welcome is an important part of the democratic process. No signs of partiality, prejudice or disrespect should be evident on the part of individual Council Members toward an individual participating in a public forum. Every effort should be made to be fair and impartial in listening to public testimony. Page 59 of 269 6 (b) Speaking Time. Council as a body agrees to be fair and equitable in allocating public hearing time to individual speakers. Pursuant to Council Procedure, the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or Acting Mayor Pro Tem will determine and announce limits on speakers at the start of the public hearing process and ensuring those with Brooklyn Center addresses have an opportunity to speak. Generally, each speaker will be allocated two minutes to speak. Applicants or their designated representatives may be allowed more time. If many speakers are anticipated, the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or Acting Mayor Pro Tem may shorten the time limit and/or ask speakers to limit themselves to new information and points of view not already covered by previous speakers. (c) Public Hearing Speakers. No speaker will be turned away unless the speaker exhibits inappropriate behavior. Each speaker may only speak once during the public hearing unless the Council requests additional clarification later in the process. After the close of the public hearing, no more public testimony will be accepted unless agreed upon by the Council. (d) Avoid Public Debate. Council Members agree to avoid debate and argument with the public. Only the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or Acting Mayor Pro Tem – not individual Council Members – can interrupt a speaker during a presentation. However, a Council Member can ask the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or Acting Mayor Pro Tem for a point of order if the speaker is off the topic or exhibiting behavior or language the Council Member finds disturbing. Council Members may request that the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or Acting Mayor seek clarification from the speaker. (e) Mayor to Focus Discussion. If speakers become flustered or defensive by Council questions, it is the responsibility of the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or Acting Mayor Pro Tem to calm and focus the speaker and to maintain the order and decorum of the meeting. Questions by Council Members to members of the public testifying should seek to clarify or expand information. It is never appropriate to belligerently challenge or belittle the speaker. Council Members agree to refrain from providing personal opinions or revealing inclinations about upcoming votes until after the public hearing is closed. (f) Avoid Personal Attacks. Council Members shall not personally attack, under any circumstance, a member or members of the public. Council Members acknowledge that cultural differences, body language, tone of voice, as well as the words they use, could be experienced as intimidating, off-putting, or aggressive to the message recipient. (g) Parliamentary Procedure. Council Members agree to follow parliamentary procedure (outlined in the Council Procedure) in conducting public meetings. The City Attorney serves as advisory parliamentarian for the City and is available to answer questions or interpret situations according to parliamentary procedures. Final rulings on parliamentary procedure are made by the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or Acting Mayor Pro Tem subject to the appeal of the full Council. 2. In Unofficial Settings (a) No Promises. Council Members may not make promises on behalf of the Council. Council Members may be asked to explain a Council action or to give their opinion about an issue as they meet and talk with constituents in the community. It is appropriate to give a brief overview of City policy and to refer to City staff for further information. It is inappropriate to overtly or implicitly promise Council action, or to Page 60 of 269 7 promise City staff will do something specific (fix a pothole, plow a specific street, plant new flowers in the median, etc.). (b) Personal Comments. Council Members agree to refrain from making personal comments about other Council Members to constituents. It is acceptable to publicly disagree about an issue, but it is unacceptable to make derogatory comments about other Council Members, their opinions and actions. (c) Public-Private Considerations. Council Members are constantly being observed by the community every day that they serve in office. Their behaviors and comments serve as models for proper conduct in the City of Brooklyn Center. Council Members agree to reflect honesty and respect for the dignity of each individual in every word, communication, (whether in social media or otherwise), and action taken by Council Members, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. It is a serious and continuous responsibility. D. Council Conduct with the Media Council Members may be contacted by the media for background and quotes. 1. Official Spokesperson. The Mayor is the official spokesperson for the representative on City position. The Mayor is the designated representative of the Council to present and speak on the official City position. If an individual Council Member (including the Mayor) is contacted by the media, the Council Member should be clear about whether their comments represent the official City position or a personal viewpoint. 2. When Speaking to the Media. Council Members agree to choose their words carefully and cautiously. Comments taken out of context can cause problems. Council Members agree to be especially cautious about humor, sardonic asides, sarcasm, or word play. It is never appropriate to use personal slurs or swear words when talking with the media. 3. Best Advice. The best advice for dealing with the media is to never go "off the record." E. Council Conduct with Other Public Agencies Council Members will be as clear as possible when representing City or personal interests. If a Council Member appears before another governmental agency or organization to give a statement on an issue, the Council Member must clearly state: 1. If his or her statement reflects personal opinion or is the official stance of the City; 2. Whether this is the majority or minority opinion of the Council. Even if the Council Member represents his or her own personal opinions, the Council Member must remember that the comments may reflect upon the City as an organization. If the Council Member is representing the City, the Council Member must support and advocate the official City position on an issue, not a personal viewpoint. Page 61 of 269 8 F. Council Conduct with Boards and Commissions The City has established several Boards and Commissions as a means of gathering more community input. The Council appoints members to all committees, boards, and commissions which serve in a purely advisory role for the Council. These commissions/committees/boards are as follows: • Cultural and Public Arts Commission, • Financial Commission; • Housing Commission; • Park and Recreation Commission; • Sister Cities Commission; • Planning Commission; and • Community Violence and Public Safety Commission The Council also appoints representatives to Visit Minneapolis Northwest Tourism, Watershed Commissions, and Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission. The Charter Commission is a statutory commission appointed by the Chief Judge of the District Court. See Minnesota Statutes 410.05 regarding appointment, terms, and discharge, of Charter Commission Members. Residents who serve on Boards and Commissions are a valuable resource to the City’s leadership and should be treated with appreciation and respect. 1. Council Liaison. “Liaison” means non-voting member of a commission who shall speak on behalf of the Council (or staff) as a whole, not as an individual, thus providing a communication link between the commission and Council (or staff). If a Council Member attends a Board or Commission meeting in the role of liaison, the Council Member agrees to execute the role as intended. 2. Limited Contact. Council Members agree to limit contact with Board and Commission Members. It is inappropriate for a Council Member to contact a Board or Commission member to lobby on behalf of an individual, business, or developer. Council Members may contact members of the Commission and staff liaison in order to clarify a position taken by the Board or Commission. 3. Commission Service. Council Members acknowledge that Boards and Commissions serve the community, not individual Council Members. The City Council appoints individuals to serve on Boards and Commissions, and it is the responsibility of Boards and Commissions to follow the policy established by the Council. However, Board and Commission members do not report to individual Council Members. Council Members cannot individually remove Board and Commission members if the parties disagree about an issue. 4. Respect Diverse Opinions. Council Members agree to be respectful of diverse opinions. The primary role of Boards and Commissions is to represent many points of view in the community and to provide the Council with advice based on a full spectrum of concerns and perspectives. Council Members agree to be fair and respectful of all residents serving on Boards and Commissions. Page 62 of 269 9 G. Accountability Measures 1. Types of Accountability Measures (a) Restorative Measures. Council Members agree to engage in restorative measures prior to initiating sanctions for violations of the Code of Respect. Restorative measures include, but are not limited to: (i) Private meeting between Council Members to discuss issues between Council Members (ii) Informal Mediation between Council Members (iii) Open discussion between Council Members at a Study or Work Session (iv) Training regarding the issue of contention (i.e. media training, first amendment training, etc.) (b) Sanctions. Council Members may face sanctions for failing to engage in restorative measures or for continued violations of the Code of Respect. Potential sanctions for the aforementioned violations may include, but are not limited to: (i) Warning. A warning shall be verbal and made by the Mayor as the Presiding Officer to the offending Council Member. (ii) Reprimand. A reprimand shall be administered to the Council Member by letter. The letter shall be approved by the City Council and shall be signed by the Mayor, or by the Mayor Pro Tem or Acting Mayor Pro Tem if the Mayor position is vacant, or if the matter involves the Mayor. (iii) Censure. A censure shall be administered pursuant to a formal resolution adopted by the Council. The resolution shall outline the offending behavior and the consensus of the Council to condemn that behavior. 2. Conduct (a) Violations. City Council Members who violate the Code of Respect are subject to warning, reprimand, or censure. Any violations that potentially constitute criminal conduct shall be handled by the criminal justice system. (b) Factors. Factors that will be considered in determining the appropriate restorative measure or sanction include but are not limited to the following: seriousness of the violation and number of preceding violations. See grid on following page for illustration of violations, corresponding restorative measures or sanctions. Page 63 of 269 10 CO D E O F R E S P E C T V I O L A T I O N G R I D AC T I O N EX A M P L E (N O N - I N C L U S I V E I L L U S T R A T I O N ) ST E P 1 : RE S T O R A T I V E M E A S U R E ST E P 2 : SA N C T I O N Ti e r 1 A M i n o r t o M o d e r a t e V i o l a t i o n Fi r s t V i o l a t i o n Di s r e s p e c t f u l o r o f f e n s i v e c o m m e n t t o Co u n c i l M e m b e r , c o n s t i t u e n t , a p p o i n t e d of f i c i a l , o r s t a f f ; • Pr i v a t e c o n v e r s a t i o n a m o n g s t th e p a r t i e s w i t h o r w i t h o u t a me d i a t o r t o t r y t o r e s o l v e t h e is s u e ; • Pa r t i e s r e s o l v e t h e i s s u e i n pr i v a t e • If s t e p 1 f a i l s , m o v e t o s t e p 2 . Pu b l i c V e r b a l W a r n i n g f r o m Pr e s i d i n g O f f i c e r Se c o n d V i o l a t i o n Co n t i n u e d d i s r e s p e c t f u l e x c h a n g e s w i t h sa m e o r d i f f e r e n t C o u n c i l M e m b e r , co n s t i t u e n t , a p p o i n t e d o f f i c i a l o r s t a f f • Pu b l i c c o n v e r s a t i o n a t s t u d y or w o r k s e s s i o n r e g a r d i n g be h a v i o r a n d p o t e n t i a l c a u s e s an d s o l u t i o n s ; • Of f e n d i n g P a r t y a t t e m p t s t o re s o l v e t h e i s s u e b y o f f e r i n g so l u t i o n s f o r c o r r e c t i v e be h a v i o r ; • Pa r t i e s r e s o l v e t h e i s s u e i n pu b l i c • If O f f e n d i n g P a r t y c a n n o t ag r e e t o r e s o l u t i o n , t h e n mo v e t o s t e p 2 . • If s t e p 1 f a i l s , m o v e t o s t e p 2 Re p r i m a n d v i a W r i t t e n L e t t e r ap p r o v e d b y C o u n c i l , s i g n e d by t h e M a y o r o r P r o T e m Th i r d V i o l a t i o n Af t e r f i r s t a n d s e c o n d v i o l a t i o n s , c o n t i n u e d di s r e s p e c t f u l c o m m e n t s / e x c h a n g e s w i t h Co u n c i l M e m b e r , c o n s t i t u e n t , a p p o i n t e d of f i c i a l , o r s t a f f N / A Pu b l i c c e n s u r e v i a C o u n c i l Re s o l u t i o n Pa g e 6 4 o f 2 6 9 11 Ti e r 2 A M o d e r a t e t o S e v e r e V i o l a t i o n F i r s t V i o l a t i o n Di r e c t i n g s t a f f t o i n v e s t i g a t e a c o n s t i t u e n t ma t t e r u n k n o w n t o C o u n c i l o r C i t y M a n a g e r • Pu b l i c c o n v e r s a t i o n r e g a r d i n g be h a v i o r a t s t u d y o r w o r k se s s i o n ; • Of f e n d i n g p a r t y i s s u e s a ve r b a l p u b l i c a p o l o g y t o t h o s e in v o l v e d • If s t e p 1 f a i l s , m o v e t o s t e p 2 Re p r i m a n d v i a W r i t t e n L e t t e r ap p r o v e d b y C o u n c i l , s i g n e d by t h e M a y o r o r P r o T e m S e c o n d V i o l a t i o n Pu b l i c l y e n d o r s e p o l i t i c a l c a n d i d a t e a t Co u n c i l M e e t i n g • Pu b l i c c o n v e r s a t i o n r e g a r d i n g be h a v i o r a t s t u d y o r w o r k se s s i o n ; • If s t e p 1 f a i l s , m o v e t o s t e p 2 Im m e d i a t e v e r b a l p u b l i c re p r i m a n d b y P r e s i d i n g Of f i c e r ; R e p r i m a n d v i a w r i t t e n le t t e r f r o m a p p r o v e d b y Co u n c i l , s i g n e d b y M a y o r o r Pr o T e m T h i r d V i o l a t i o n Mi s r e p r e s e n t a C i t y p o s i t i o n / S p e a k o n be h a l f o f t h e C i t y w i t h n o C o u n c i l co n s e n s u s o n t h e m a t t e r a t h a n d Pu b l i c c e n s u r e v i a C o u n c i l re s o l u t i o n Ti e r 3 : An E g r e g i o u s V i o l a t i o n V i o l a t i o n Us e p r o f a n e l a n g u a g e t o w a r d C o u n c i l me m b e r ( s ) , s t a f f , c o n s t i t u e n t , a p p o i n t e d of f i c i a l ; Af t e r i n v e s t i g a t i o n , f o u n d t o h a v e v i o l a t e d Mi n n e s o t a G o v e r n m e n t D a t a P r a c t i c e s A c t Ce n s u r e / P o s s i b l e C r i m i n a l Co n s e q u e n c e s Pa g e 6 5 o f 2 6 9 12 3. Conduct During Meetings (a) Inappropriate Statements. For inappropriate statements or conduct by Council Members occurring during a Council meeting, a verbal correction by the Mayor (or Mayor Pro Tem or acting Mayor Pro Tem) will normally be the first step to address the matter, either during or after the Council meeting. (b) Further Incidents. Further incidents at the same meeting may be addressed by subsequent verbal corrections accompanied by use of the gavel. Repeated incidents can give rise to the Mayor not recognizing the offending Council Member to speak. A Council Member can request that the Mayor take any of these actions against an offending Council Member if the Mayor has not done so on her/his own. 4. Reporting a Potential Violation (a) A member of the Brooklyn Center City Council may report a potential Code of Respect violation by a member of the City Council by bringing the matter to the attention of the official of their choice, Mayor, City Manager, or City Attorney. (b) A Brooklyn Center staff member may report a potential Code of Respect violation by a member of the City Council by bringing the matter to the attention of the City Manager or Human Resources Manager. (c) If the potential violation involves the Mayor, it should be brought to the attention of the Mayor Pro Tem, City Manager or City Attorney. (d) A community member may report potential Code of Respect violations by a member of the City Council to the Mayor, City Manager or any member of the City Council. 5. Alternative Reporting If the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or Acting Mayor Pro Tem are unable to be involved in reviewing the Code of Respect complaint for any reason, the matter will be reviewed by the next most senior member of the Council that is not involved in the complaint. 6. Investigation Procedure (a) Triage. The Mayor and City Manager will gather initial information, consult with the City Attorney if necessary and decide how to move forward. (b) Fact Finding. If necessary, the matter will be referred to the criminal justice system. The Mayor and City Manager will determine whether to pursue independent fact-finding or internal fact-finding. (c) Possible Outcomes. As is referenced above, A restorative solution will be sought prior to moving to a sanction. (i) a verbal warning may be given to the Council Member by the Mayor, (ii) a reprimand may Page 66 of 269 13 be administered to the Council Member by a letter approved by the Council, or (iii) a censure may be administered pursuant to a formal resolution adopted by the Council. (d) Notice and Hearing. After voting to issue a reprimand or censure, the City Council will provide written notice to the Council Member at least fourteen (14) days prior to the Council’s formal action upon the reprimand or censure. The notice may be served by mail and shall specify the grounds for the reprimand or censure and state the date the Council will take action upon the reprimand or censure. At any time prior to the Council’s formal action, the Council Member may, in writing, request a hearing before the City Council, which shall be held at the next regular City Council meeting. After the hearing, the City Council shall decide whether or not to proceed with the reprimand or censure. H. Ethics 1. Open Meeting Law (a) State law requires that, with certain exceptions, meetings of the City Council be open to the public. A meeting is a gathering of a majority of City Council Members at which City business is discussed. It is not necessary that action be taken for a gathering to constitute a “meeting.” (b) A meeting does not include chance, social gatherings as long as public business is not discussed. (c) A majority of Council Members should not communicate with each other by phone, email, in-person, or otherwise, to discuss City business. (d) Use of social media does not violate the open meeting law as long as social media use is accessible to all Members of the public. See Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D, for further information regarding the Open Meeting Law. 2. Gift Law A City Council Member cannot accept a gift from someone who has an interest in any matter involving the City. A “gift” includes money, property, a service, a loan, forgiveness of a loan, or a promise of future employment. A “gift” does not include: • Campaign contributions; • items costing less than $5; • items given to members of a group; the majority of whose members are not local officials; • gifts given by family members; or • food or beverages given at a reception, meal or meeting at which a Council Member is making a speech or answering questions as part of a program See Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.895 City Charter, Section 14.04(A), and Section II, 2.95 of the Brooklyn Center Code of Policies for further information regarding the Gift Law and procedure. Page 67 of 269 14 3. Conflict of interest (a) City Council Members cannot have a personal financial interest in a sale, lease, or contract with the City. (b) City Council Members cannot participate in matters in which the Council Member’s own personal interest, financial or otherwise, is so distinct from the public interest that the (c) Council Member cannot be expected to fairly represent the public’s interest when voting on the matter. See Minnesota Statutes Section 471.87, and Section II, 2.95 of the Brooklyn Center Code of Policies of further information about Conflicts of Interest involving Public Officers. Page 68 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Reggie Edwards, City Manager THROUGH: BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Approving the City of Brooklyn Center Commission Code of Respect Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve the Resolution Adopting the City Commission Code of Respect and Ethics Background: The City Council discussed at its study sessions throughout 2024 and 2025 the issue of adopting a City Commission Code of Respect and Ethics (see attached) to better address Commissioner interactions and behavior between Commissioners, the Public, and City Staff. The City Commission Code of Respect and Ethics will be incorporated into the City Code of Policies as Section IX (numerical assignment subject to future revision) and will include in-depth guidance for all City Commissions regarding behavior in and outside of Commission Meetings, Ethics, and provides accountability measures for Commissioners. The City Council determines it is in the City’s best interests to amend the City Code of Policies to include the City Commission Code of Respect and Ethics to provide additional context and guidance on how City Commissioners can best exemplify the values of the City and model respectful interactions in the face of disagreement and discord. The City Commission Code of Respect and Ethics will serve as a positive tool to maintain camaraderie, collaboration, and to assist the Commissions and the City Council in executing the business of the City. Attached is a copy of the Brooklyn Center Commission Code of Respect and authorizing resolution. Budget Issues: NA Inclusive Community Engagement: Inclusive of all Page 69 of 269 Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Applicable to all Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2025- City Commission Code of Respect 2. Brooklyn_Center_City_Commission_Code_of_Respect_and_Ethics Page 70 of 269 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-___ RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY COMMISSION CODE OF RESPECT AND ETHICS WHEREAS, the City Council discussed at its study sessions throughout 2024 and 2025 the issue of adopting a City Commission Code of Respect and Ethics to better address Commissioner interactions and behavior between Commissioners, the Public, and City Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Commission Code of Respect and Ethics will be incorporated into the City Code of Policies as Section IX (numerical assignment subject to future revision) and will include in-depth guidance for all City Commissions regarding behavior in and outside of Commission Meetings, Ethics, and provides accountability measures for Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines it is in the City’s best interests to amend the City Code of Policies to include the City Commission Code of Respect and Ethics to provide additional context and guidance on how City Commissioners can best exemplify the values of the City and model respectful interactions in the face of disagreement and discord; and WHEREAS, the City Commission Code of Respect and Ethics will serve as a positive tool to maintain camaraderie, collaboration, and to assist the Commissions and the City Council in executing the business of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center as follows: 1. The City Commission Code of Respect and Ethics is hereby adopted in its substantial form, subject to future amendments as directed by Council, and non-substantive updates by City Staff. 2. The City Code of Policies is hereby amended by adding the City Commission Code of Respect and Ethics, attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is incorporated in and made part of this Resolution. 3. The City Manager and staff are authorized and directed to insert the new Section IX into the City Code of Policies, and said updated document shall constitute the official Code of Policies. October 13, 2025 Date Mayor Page 71 of 269 ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 72 of 269 Exhibit A Page 73 of 269 1 BR291-4-1038794.v10 Brooklyn Center City Commission Code of Respect and Ethics Table of Contents Brooklyn Center City Commission Code of Respect and Ethics ..........................................................2 A. Commissioner Conduct with One Another .............................................................................2 1. In Public Meetings .............................................................................................................2 2. In Private Encounters ........................................................................................................3 B. Commissioner Conduct with City Council ................................................................................4 C. Commissioner Conduct with City Staff ...................................................................................4 D. Commissioner Conduct with the Public .................................................................................5 1. In Public Meetings ............................................................................................................5 2. In Unofficial Settings .........................................................................................................6 E. Commissioner Conduct with Other Public Agencies ...............................................................6 F. Poor Conduct and Accountability Measures ..........................................................................6 1. Conduct .............................................................................................................................6 2. Types of Accountability Measures .....................................................................................7 3. Process ..............................................................................................................................7 4. Conduct During Meetings ..................................................................................................8 G. Ethics ....................................................................................................................................9 1. Open Meeting Law ............................................................................................................9 2. Gift Law .............................................................................................................................9 3. Conflict of interest .............................................................................................................9 Page 74 of 269 2 Brooklyn Center City Commission Code of Respect and Ethics A. Commissioner Conduct with One Another City Commissions are composed of individuals with a wide variety of backgrounds, personalities, values, opinions, and goals. Despite this diversity, all have chosen to serve the community. In all cases, this common goal should be acknowledged even as Commissioners may "agree to disagree" on contentious issues. These guidelines are meant to establish professional boundaries between Commissioners and are in no way meant to be a restriction on speech. Decorum and rules governing conduct are essential to the smooth operation of public meetings. 1. In Public Meetings (a) Commissioner Interaction. Commissioners agree to practice civility, professionalism and decorum in discussions and debate. Difficult questions, tough challenges to a particular point of view, and criticism of ideas and information are legitimate elements of a free democracy in action. Commissioners can promote camaraderie and collaboration by refraining from making belligerent, personal, impertinent, slanderous, threatening, abusive, or disparaging comments. Shouting or physical actions that could be construed as threatening will not be tolerated. Commissioners should make every effort to conduct themselves in a professional manner at all times, including listening actively during Commission meetings. (b) Deference to Order. Commissioners agree to honor the roles of Commission leadership including the Chair and Co-Chair in maintaining order by deferring to their direction and guidance. It is the responsibility of the Chair and/or Co-Chair to keep the Commission meetings on track during meetings. Commissioners agree to honor efforts by the Chair or Co-Chair to focus discussion on current agenda items. If there is disagreement about the agenda or Chair or Co-Chair’s actions, those objections should be voiced politely and with reason, following procedures outlined in parliamentary procedure. (c) Setting a Positive Example. One prominent goal of every commission meeting should be to demonstrate a positive example of decorum and respect for constituents. To accomplish that goal, Commissioners agree to avoid comments that personally attack other Commissioners. If a Commissioner is personally attacked by the comments of another Commissioner, the offended Commissioner will make notes of the actual words used and may call for a "point of order" to challenge the other Commissioner to justify or apologize for the language used. The Chair or Co-Chair will maintain control of this discussion. (d) Collaborative Problem Solving. Another goal of the commission meeting is to demonstrate effective problem-solving approaches. Commissioners have a responsibility to show how individuals with disparate points of view can find common ground and seek a compromise that benefits the community as a whole. Page 75 of 269 3 (e) Timeliness. To ensure smooth and timely execution of each commission meeting, Commissioners agree make best efforts to be punctual and keep comments relative to topics discussed. Every Commissioner has made a commitment to attend meetings and participate in discussions. Therefore, it is important that Commissioners be punctual and that meetings start on time. It is equally important that discussions on issues be relative to the topic at hand to allow adequate time to fully discuss scheduled issues. (f) Endorsement of Candidates. It is inappropriate to mention endorsements during commission meetings or other official City meetings or functions. (g) Professional Courtesy. Commissioners endeavor to avoid putting colleagues in awkward or disadvantageous positions in an effort to capitalize on another colleagues’ vulnerability or to embarrass them publicly. Commissioners agree to make every attempt to submit questions or concerns to the Staff Liaison prior to formal meetings to avoid surprising Commissioners, Council Liaisons, or Staff at said meetings. (h) One Voice. Commissioners are a part of a group that is charged with conducting business as a group. Individual Commissioners should not speak on behalf of the entire Commission unless directed by the Chair or majority vote of the Commission to present a Commission position to the City Council. Individual Commissioners should not act on behalf of the Commission if there has not been a Council, City Manager, or Commission majority, directive to do so. (i) Personal Attacks. Commissioners shall not personally attack, under any circumstance, another member of a Commission. Commissioners acknowledge that cultural differences, body language, tone of voice, as well as the words they use, could be experienced as intimidating, off-putting, or aggressive to the message recipient. 2. In Private Encounters (a) Respectful Workplace Values. Commissioners endeavor to model respectful behavior in private contact with other Commissioners. The same level of respect and consideration of differing points of view that are deemed appropriate for public discussions should be maintained in private conversations with other Commissioners. (b) Data Practices. Commissioners recognize that written notes, voicemail messages, social media and email may be public information. Technology allows words written or said without much forethought to be distributed wide and far. Commissioners agree to consider the following: (1) how they, their family and/or friends would feel if this voicemail message was played on a speaker phone in a full office? Or broadcast on the nightly news; (2) What could the consequences be if this email message was forwarded to others? Commissioners understand and acknowledge that written notes, social media postings, voicemail messages and email should be treated as potentially “public” communication. Page 76 of 269 4 B. Commissioner Conduct with City Council 1. Council Liaison. “Liaison” means non-voting member of a commission who shall speak on behalf of the Council (or staff) as a whole, not as an individual, thus providing a communication link between the commission and Council (or staff). If a Council Member attends a Board or Commission meeting in the role of liaison, each Commissioner should treat the Council Member with the same respect as the Commissioner would treat other Commission Members. 2. Limited Contact. Commissioners agree to limit contact with Council Members. It is inappropriate for a Commissioner to contact a City Council Member to lobby on behalf of an individual, business, or developer, or personal mission. Commissioners may utilize the staff liaison, Deputy City Manager, or City Manager in order to clarify or better understand a position taken by the Council. Notwithstanding the above, this section does not govern personal relationships between Commissioners as individual members of the community and Council Members as individual members of the Community. Both parties should endeavor to keep personal and professional relationships separate. 3. Commission Service. The City Council appoints individuals to serve on Boards and Commissions, and it is the responsibility of the Boards and Commissions to follow the policy established by the Council. However, Board and Commission members do not report to individual Council Members. 4. Respect Diverse Opinions. Commissioners agree to be respectful of diverse opinions. The primary role of Commissioners is to represent many points of view in the community and to provide the Council with advice based on a full spectrum of concerns and perspectives. Council Members agree to be fair and respectful of all residents serving on Boards and Commissions, and Commissioners agree to be fair and respectful of Council Members serving on the City Council. C. Commissioner Conduct with City Staff Governance of the City is a cooperative effort, including elected officials, appointed officials, and staff. Therefore, every effort should be made to be cooperative and show mutual respect for the contributions made by each individual for the good of the community. 1. Respectful Workplace Values. Commissioners agree to treat all staff as professionals. Commissioners agree to engage in clear, honest communication that respects the abilities, experience, expertise, and dignity of each individual. Berating, personal, impertinent, slanderous, threatening, abusive, or disparaging comments toward staff are not acceptable and are automatic grounds for a Code of Resect violation. 2. City Staff Contact. General questions regarding commission procedure, bylaws, commission activities, commission projects, commission meetings, etc. should be directed to the assigned Staff Liaison. Questions regarding compliance with general city policies, or questions related to staff liaison commission management should be directed to the City Manager. f 3. Staff Criticism. Commissioners should not publicly criticize an individual employee. Commissioners agree to express concerns about the performance of a City employee directly to the City Manager Page 77 of 269 5 through private correspondence or conversation. Commissioners will refrain from expressing concerns in public, to the employee directly, or to the employee’s manager. 4. Political Solicitation. Commissioners will not solicit any type of political support (financial contributions, display of posters or lawn signs, name on support list, etc.) from City staff. 5. Personal Comments about other Commissioners. Commissioners agree to refrain from speaking ill of other Commissioners to staff. This puts staff in an uncomfortable and compromising position because staff have the responsibility to treat all Commissioners equally and with respect. 6. Personal Attacks. Commissioners shall not personally attack, under any circumstance, a member of city staff. Commissioners acknowledge that cultural differences, body language, tone of voice, as well as the words they use, could be experienced as intimidating, off-putting, or aggressive to the message recipient. D. Commissioner Conduct with the Public 1. In Public Meetings (a) Create a Welcoming Environment. Making the public feel welcome is an important part of the democratic process. No signs of partiality, prejudice or disrespect should be evident on the part of individual Commissioners toward an individual participating in a public forum. Every effort should be made to be fair and impartial in listening to public testimony. (b) Speaking Time (For Commissions with Public Hearings). The Commission as a body agrees to be fair and equitable in allocating public hearing time to individual speakers. The Commission Chair or Co-Chair will determine and announce limits on speakers at the start of the public hearing process and ensuring those with Brooklyn Center addresses have an opportunity to speak. Generally, each speaker will be allocated two minutes to speak. Applicants or their designated representatives may be allowed more time. If many speakers are anticipated, the Chair or Co-Chair may shorten the time limit and/or ask speakers to limit themselves to new information and points of view not already covered by previous speakers. (c) Public Hearing Speakers (For Commissions with Public Hearings). No speaker will be turned away unless the speaker exhibits inappropriate behavior. Each speaker may only speak once during the public hearing unless the Commission requests additional clarification later in the process. After the close of the public hearing, no more public testimony will be accepted unless agreed upon by the Commission. (d) Avoid Public Debate. Commissioners agree to avoid debate and argument with members of the public. Only the Chair or Co-Chair – not individual Commissioners – can interrupt a speaker during a presentation, question, or comment. However, a Commissioner can ask the Chair or Co-Chair for a point of order if the speaker is off the topic or exhibiting behavior or language the Commissioner finds disturbing. Commissioners may request that the Chair or Co-Chair seek clarification from the speaker. (e) Commission Chair to Focus Discussion. If speakers become flustered or defensive by Commissioner questions, it is the responsibility of the Chair or Co-Chair to calm and focus the speaker and to maintain Page 78 of 269 6 the order and decorum of the meeting. Questions by Commissioners to members of the public testifying should seek to clarify or expand information. It is never appropriate to belligerently challenge or belittle the speaker. Commissioners agree to refrain from providing personal opinions or revealing inclinations about upcoming votes until after the public hearing is closed. (f) Personal Attacks. Commissioners shall not personally attack, under any circumstance, a member/members of the public. Commissioners acknowledge that cultural differences, body language, tone of voice, as well as the words they use, could be experienced as intimidating, off-putting, or aggressive to the message recipient. 2. In Unofficial Settings (a) No Promises. Commissioners may not make promises on behalf of the Commission. Commissioners may be asked to explain a Commission policy or recommendation or to give their opinion about an issue as they meet and talk with constituents in the community. It is appropriate to give a brief overview of City policy and to refer to City staff for further information. It is inappropriate to overtly or implicitly promise Commission or Council action, or to promise City staff will do something specific (fix a pothole, plow a specific street, plant new flowers in the median, etc.). (b) Public-Private Considerations. Commissioners may be observed by the community as they serve the city in their capacity as commissioners. Commissioner behaviors and comments serve as models for proper conduct in the City of Brooklyn Center. Commissioners endeavor to reflect honesty and respect for the dignity of each individual in every word, communication, and action taken by Commissioners. , E. Commissioner Conduct with Other Public Agencies Commissioners will be as clear as possible when representing City interests. If a Commissioner is directed to appear by Commission Leadership, City Leadership, or City Council, and appears before another governmental agency or organization to give a statement on an issue, the Commissioner must clearly support and advocate the official City position on an issue, not a personal viewpoint. F. Poor Conduct and Accountability Measures If Commissioner conduct becomes an issue that must be addressed more seriously, the City has outlined a restorative procedure to address poor Commissioner conduct. Commissioner restoration is the goal, not sanction. However, Commissioners may face more serious consequences the more serious their conduct becomes. 1. Conduct (a) Violations. Commissioners who violate the Code of Respect will be subject to accountability measures. Any violations that potentially constitute criminal conduct shall be handled by the criminal justice system. Page 79 of 269 7 (b) Factors. Factors that will be considered in determining the appropriate restorative measure or sanction include but are not limited to the following: seriousness of the violation and number of preceding violations. 2. Types of Accountability Measures (a) Restorative Measures Commissioners agree to engage in restorative measures prior to the City initiating sanctions for violations of the Code of Respect. Restorative measures include, but are not limited to: (i) Private meeting between the Commissioner and the City Manager (ii) Informal Mediation between involved parties and a Mediator (iii) Mediator issues recommendations (i.e. training, public apology, meeting suspension, etc.) (iv) Commissioner and/or Involved Parties to follow recommendations (v) If Commissioner refuses to follow recommendations, then the process moves to sanctions. (b) Sanction Commissioners may face commission removal for failing to engage in restorative measures or for continued violations of the Code of Respect. 3. Process (a) Filing a Complaint and/or Reporting a Code of Respect Violation (i) A Commissioner may report a potential Code of Respect violation by another Commissioner by bringing the matter to the attention of the official of their choice, Mayor, or the City Manager. (ii) A Brooklyn Center staff member may report a potential Code of Respect violation by a City Commissioner by bringing the matter to the attention of the City Manager or Human Resources Manager. (iii) If the potential violation involves the Mayor, it should be brought to the attention of the Mayor Pro Tem, City Manager, or City Attorney. (iv) A community member may report potential Code of Respect violations by a member of a City Commission to the Mayor, City Manager or any member of the City Council. (b) Investigation (i) Triage. The Mayor and City Manager will gather initial information, consult with the City Attorney if necessary and decide how to move forward. (ii) Fact Finding. If necessary, the matter will be referred to the criminal justice system. The Mayor and City Manager will determine whether to pursue independent fact-finding or internal fact-finding. Page 80 of 269 8 (iii) Possible Outcomes. After an investigation, the City Manager, in consultation with proper staff, will determine if the complaint is substantiated or unsubstantiated. A restorative solution will be sought prior to moving to a sanction. (1) If Substantiated: The Commissioner will have a consultation with the City Manager, if that is unsuccessful, then the parties move to a graduated resolution process: • Informal mediation with harmed individuals and City designee (Mediator); • Mediator issues recommendations • Commissioner / Involved Parties to follow recommendations • If Commissioner refuses to follow recommendations, then the process moves to sanction. (2) Sanction: (Last Resort) • City Manager compiles redacted report for Council review (names, commission, other identifying information will be removed from the report) • After review of the circumstances and recommendation, Council will use a standard form provided by the Administration to communicate their vote • Administration will provide Council forms to Mayor • Mayor will state Council vote on the record • If Commissioner is removed from service, Commissioner will receive a letter of removal from the Council • Commission Removal results in automatic bar from Commission Appointment for 2 years (3) If Unsubstantiated: City Manager to work with City Attorney to determine resolution compliant with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act 4. Conduct During Meetings (a) Inappropriate Statements. For inappropriate statements or conduct by Commissioners occurring during a Commission meeting, a verbal correction by the Commission Chair will normally be the first step to address the matter, either during or after the meeting. (b) Further Incidents. Further incidents at the same meeting may be addressed by subsequent verbal corrections accompanied Repeated incidents can give rise to Chair not recognizing the offending Commissioner to speak. A Commissioner can request that the Chair take any of these actions against an offending Commissioner if the Chair has not done so on her/his/their own. Page 81 of 269 9 G. Ethics 1. Open Meeting Law (a) Meetings of Council Commissions must be open the public. A meeting is a gathering of a majority of Commissioners at which City business is discussed. It is not necessary that action be taken for a gathering to constitute a “meeting.” (b) A meeting does not include chance social gatherings as long as public business is not discussed. (c) A majority of Commissioners should not communicate with each other by phone, email, social media, in-person, or otherwise, to discuss City business. (d) Use of social media does not violate the open meeting law as long as social media use is accessible to all Members of the public. See Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D, for further information regarding the Open Meeting Law. 2. Gift Law A City Commissioner cannot accept a gift from someone who has an interest in any matter involving the City. A “gift” includes money, property, a service, a loan, forgiveness of a loan, or a promise of future employment. A “gift” does not include: • Campaign contributions; • Items costing less than $5; • Items given to members of a group; the majority of whose members are not local officials; • Gifts given by family members; or • Food or beverages given at a reception, meal or meeting at which a Council Member is making a speech or answering questions as part of a program See Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.895 City Charter, Section 14.04(A), and Section II, 2.95 of the Brooklyn Center Code of Policies for further information regarding the Gift Law and procedure. 3. Conflict of interest (a) Commissioners cannot have a personal financial interest in a sale, lease, or contract with the City. (b) Commissioners cannot participate in matters in which the Commissioner’s own personal interest, financial or otherwise, is so distinct from the public interest that the Commissioners cannot be expected to fairly represent the public’s interest when voting on the matter. See Minnesota Statutes Section 471.87, and Section II, 2.95 of the Brooklyn Center Code of Policies of further information about Conflicts of Interest involving Public Officers. Page 82 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Reggie Edwards, City Manager THROUGH: BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Approval of the Council Meeting Decorum Requested Council Action: -Motion to Approve the Amended Council Meeting Decorum Background: The City Council desires to amend the existing City Council Meeting Decorum policy (see attached) to reflect the current posture of the sitting council and to better communicate desired outcomes at City Council Meetings involving members of the public. The Council Meeting Decorum policy will hereinafter be titled the City Council Meeting Decorum for the Public, and said policy will be incorporated into the City Code of Policies as Section X (numerical assignment subject to future revision). The City Council Meeting Decorum for the Public is hereby amended to remove Paragraphs A(6) and A(7), and to restate Paragraph A(1) to read: “Members of the public may only speak during meetings when allowed under Council Rules and only after being recognized by the presiding officer. The City Council has established time limits for the acceptance of public comments or testimony. The City Council Meeting Decorum for the Public Policy will serve as a positive tool to maintain order, flow, and aid in the seamless execution of Council meetings; thereby serving the community and efficiently executing the business of the City. Attached is a copy of the amended City Council Meeting Decorum and authorizing resolution. Budget Issues: NA Inclusive Community Engagement: Inclusive of all Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Applicable to all Page 83 of 269 Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution_-_City_Council_Meeting_Decorum_for_the_Public 2. City_Council_Meeting_Decorum_for_the_Public Page 84 of 269 BR291-434-1053795.v1 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-___ RESOLUTION AMENDING CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECORUM FOR THE PUBLIC WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the existing the City Council Meeting Decorum policy to reflect the current posture of the sitting council and to better communicate desired outcomes at City Council Meetings involving members of the public; and WHEREAS, the Council Meeting Decorum policy will hereinafter be titled the City Council Meeting Decorum for the Public, and said policy will be incorporated into the City Code of Policies as Section X (numerical assignment subject to future revision); and WHEREAS, the City Council Meeting Decorum for the Public is hereby amended to remove Paragraphs A(6) and A(7), and to restate Paragraph A(1) to read: “Members of the public may only speak during meetings when allowed under Council Rules and only after being recognized by the presiding officer. The City Council has established time limits for the acceptance of public comments or testimony;” and WHEREAS, the City Council Meeting Decorum for the Public Policy will serve as a positive tool to maintain order, flow, and aid in the seamless execution of Council meetings thereby serving the community and efficiently executing business of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center as follows: 1. The City Council Meeting Decorum for the Public is hereby adopted in its substantial form, subject to future amendments as directed by Council, and non-substantive updates by City Staff. 2. The City Code of Policies is hereby amended by adding the City Council Meeting Decorum for the Public, attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is incorporated in and made part of this Resolution. 3. The City Manager and staff are authorized and directed to insert the new Section X into the City Code of Policies, and said updated document shall constitute the official Code of Policies. Date Mayor Page 85 of 269 ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 86 of 269 Exhibit A Page 87 of 269 BR291-434-1053794.v1 COUNCIL MEETING DECORUM FOR THE PUBLIC To ensure meetings are conducted in a professional and courteous manner which enables the orderly conduct of business, all persons in attendance or who participate in such meetings shall conduct themselves in a manner that does not interfere with the ability of others to observe and, when allowed, to participate without disruption or fear of intimidation. A. Decorum. Persons who attend meetings must avoid conduct that disrupts, interferes with, or disturbs the orderly conduct of the meeting or the ability of other attendees to observe and participate as appropriate. To that end, persons who attend meetings are subject to the following: (1) Members of the public may only speak during meetings when allowed under Council Rules and only after being recognized by the presiding officer. The City Council has established time limits for the acceptance of public comments or testimony. (2) Public comments or testimony must be addressed to the presiding officer and not to other Council Members, staff, or others in attendance. (3) All elected officials shall be referred to by their proper title and surname. (4) Public comments should avoid personal accusations, profanity, or other improper content for a public meeting. (5) Intimidating behaviors, threats of hostility, or actual violence are disallowed. B. The presiding officer shall request any person(s) who disrupt, interfere with or disturb the orderly conduct of a meeting to cease the conduct and, as necessary, shall issue an oral warning to the individual(s) found to be in violation. If the individual(s) persists in disrupting, interfering with, or disturbing the meeting, the presiding officer may have the individual(s) removed or, under appropriate circumstances, temporarily clear the gallery. If for any reason the presiding officer fails to take such action, a majority vote may be substituted for action by the presiding officer to maintain order and decorum over the proceedings. C. The Council Chambers capacity is 76 persons per fire code. Page 88 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Garett Flesland, Chief of Police THROUGH: Reggie Edwards, City Manager BY: Garett Flesland, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Resolution Approving Participation in the Brazos Citation Software Solution Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve the Resolution Approving Participation in the Brazos Citation Software Solution Background: The City of Brooklyn Center Police Department, along with other LOGIS Public Safety member agencies, has long utilized the APS/Ticketwriter system for electronic citations. This system, owned by CentralSquare, is outdated, has ongoing technical limitations, and is no longer being enhanced or fully supported. The LOGIS Police Executive Steering Committee (PESC) directed staff to research and evaluate replacement solutions. After a two-year process that included multiple product reviews and a site visit with existing users, the committee recommended the Brazos citation software by Tyler Technologies. The Brazos system offers significant improvements in functionality, user support, and long-term sustainability. It will be implemented as a LOGIS-supported cloud-based product through a site-license subscription, with proportional costs allocated to each participating member city or county. The LOGIS membership voted on September 16, 2025, to move forward with Brazos. Each participating agency is required to secure governing body approval and execute a Letter of Understanding before LOGIS finalizes the contract. Budget Issues: The estimated implementation cost for the Brazos product across all members is $204,460, which will be covered through LOGIS Public Safety Development Funds. Ongoing annual support costs are estimated at $232,234 for all users, with Brooklyn Center’s proportional share included in the annual LOGIS budget process. Inclusive Community Engagement: N/A Page 89 of 269 Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: N/A Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. DRAFT Brazos Resolution 2. Letter of Understanding_Brazos Page 90 of 269 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- RESOLUTION APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN THE BRAZOS CITATION SOFTWARE SOLUTION IN COOPERATION WITH THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (LOGIS) ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has identified specific technology needs necessary to carry out public safety functions and services, including the use of an electronic citation system; and WHEREAS, LOGIS Public Safety members, including the City of Brooklyn Center, have long utilized the APS/Ticketwriter product, which is now outdated, has limited support, and will no longer be sustained in the future; and WHEREAS, after a multi-year evaluation process and upon recommendation of the LOGIS Police Executive Steering Committee (PESC), Tyler Technologies’ Brazos citation product was selected as the replacement solution, offering improved functionality, better technical support, and cost-effectiveness; and WHEREAS, LOGIS will enter into a contract with Brazos on behalf of its member agencies through a site-license subscription, with costs proportionally allocated to participating members as part of the annual LOGIS budget; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center desires to participate in this project and acknowledges its responsibility for its share of the licensing and implementation costs as outlined in the attached Letter of Understanding. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The City Council approves participation in the Brazos citation software solution in cooperation with the Local Government Information Systems (LOGIS) Association. 2. The City Manager and Chief of Police are authorized to execute the Letter of Understanding, agreements, and related documents necessary to implement the Brazos citation software solution on behalf of the City. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Page 91 of 269 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 92 of 269 Page 1 of 2 Brazos Citation Software Solution Letter of Understanding September 19, 2025 Dear LOGIS Member, This Letter of Understanding is intended to memorialize the members’ decision to authorize LOGIS to enter into a contract with Brazos, a Tyler Technologies company, to acquire access to a new electronic citation software solution on behalf of its members. In prior communications, members were informed that the Brazos solution is being provided to the membership through an annual site-license subscription between Brazos and LOGIS. With the cost of this subscription being proportionally allocated to the members as part of the annual budget process. The site license must be procured prior to beginning the process to migrate members from the legacy system to Brazos. As such, if a member chooses to terminate their participation in the Brazos service offering, they remain responsible for their share of the software licensing that has been secured by LOGIS on their behalf. The following table depicts each member’s share of the 2026 site license as presented at the September 16, 2025, Police Executive Steering Committee meeting: Page 93 of 269 Page 2 of 2 Please note that members should expect annual inflationary-type increases in subsequent calendar years. This Letter of Understanding has been reviewed and approved as indicated below. [Member representative name] Christopher K. Miller [Member organization name] LOGIS Executive Director Date: Date: Page 94 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: THROUGH: BY: Jesse Anderson, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Approval of Special TIF Legislation Requested Council Action: - Motion to Approve the Resolution Approving Special Legislation Related to Brooklyn Center Tax Increment Financing Authority Background: While working toward redevelopment of the Opportunity Site, staff recognized that existing tax increment financing (TIF) options were not going to be adequate to achieve the City’s development objectives on the site. The challenges stemmed from two primary issues: 1. The City’s existing TIF District No.7 set up for the project is already collecting increment, so the clock started ticking on the district’s duration. In the best-case scenario, a project starting today would have only 16 years of increment to work with, instead of the full 26 years in a new district. 2. Many of the buildings in the Opportunity Site either have or will be torn down. The creation of new redevelopment TIF districts relies on the presence of substandard buildings. Without buildings on a particular redevelopment site, the city would not be able to create a new redevelopment TIF district under current statute. Having the ability to leverage TIF Districts throughout the Opportunity Site with a full 26- year duration is going to be critical in meeting city objectives. The cost of infrastructure, development financing gaps, and other community benefits are significant. These TIF districts are the City’s primary mechanism to help pay for these costs and achieve the outcome on the site that the City Council wants to see. Given this need, Brooklyn Center staff worked with the City Council, State Legislature, the city’s lobbyist, Kennedy and Graven, and Ehlers to advance special TIF legislation for the Opportunity Site. This effort began with the 2024 legislative session, but during that session there were no special TIF bills passed for any City. The City renewed this effort in the 2025 session and was fortunate in securing the special legislation necessary for the Opportunity Site. Special Legislation The approved special TIF legislation will allow the City to create up to two (2) redevelopment tax increment financing districts within the Opportunity Site even though Page 95 of 269 many of the buildings have already been removed. This was a critical change necessary to allow up to 26 years of increment collections for Opportunity Site projects. In addition, since many of the sites are owned by the EDA and buildings are already removed, the special legislation also exempts the City from the provision in statute (469.176 subd. 4j) requiring at least 90 percent of the revenues derived from tax increments be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation of the redevelopment district. This provides needed flexibility for use of the increments. The City Council must still approve new tax increment financing plans to establish new TIF Districts using this authority. The authority to approve a tax increment financing plan under the special legislation expires on December 31, 2031. Next Steps The special TIF legislation is only effective after the City (1) adopts a resolution approving the special legislation, and (2) filing the approved resolution with the Secretary of State’s Office. The purpose of this action is to consider approval of the necessary resolution. If approved, city staff will work to file the resolution with the Secretary of State’s Office. Once those steps are complete, the legislation is considered effective. The City will then have the ability, but not the requirement, to establish up to two (2) new redevelopment TIF districts for Opportunity Site Projects. Budget Issues: This item will have no immediate effect on the budget. Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. FINAL Legislation 2. DOCSOPEN-#1046087-v1- Resolution_Adopting_Minn__Sess__Law__1st_Special_Session_2025- 2026__Chapter_13__Article_5__Section_7 Page 96 of 269 Minnesota Session Laws, 2025, 1st Special Session, Chapter 13, Article 5, Section 7. Sec. 7. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER; TIF AUTHORITY. Subdivision 1. Establishment. Under the special rules established in subdivision 2, the economic development authority of the city of Brooklyn Center or the city of Brooklyn Center may establish not more than two redevelopment tax increment financing districts located wholly within the area in the city identified as the "Opportunity Site," which includes the area bounded by Shingle Creek Parkway from Hennepin County State-Aid Highway 10 to Summit Drive North; Summit Drive North from Shingle Creek Parkway to marked Trunk Highway 100; marked Trunk Highway 100 from Summit Drive North to Hennepin County State-Aid Highway 10; and Hennepin County State-Aid Highway 10 from marked Trunk Highway 100 to Shingle Creek Parkway, together with internal and adjacent roads and rights of way. Subd. 2. Special rules. If the city or the authority establishes a tax increment financing district under this section, the following special rules apply: (1) the district is deemed to meet all the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.174, subdivision 10; and (2) Minnesota Statutes, section 469.176, subdivision 4j, does not apply to the district. Subd. 3. Expiration. The authority to approve a tax increment financing plan to establish a tax increment financing district under this section expires on December 31, 2031. EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day after the governing body of the city of Brooklyn Center and its chief clerical officer comply with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3. Page 97 of 269 BR291-16-1046087.v1 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. ________ RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIAL LEGISLATION RELATED TO BROOKLYN CENTER TAX INCREMENT FINANCING AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Minnesota legislature, in 1st Special Session, 2025 Minn. Laws, Chapter 13, Article 5, Section 7, approved special legislation which provides authority to the Economic Development Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center (“EDA”) or the City of Brooklyn Center (“City”) to establish not more than two redevelopment tax increment financing districts located wholly within the area in the city identified as the "Opportunity Site” before December 31, 2031; WHEREAS, the Minnesota legislature, in 1st Special Session, 2025 Minn. Laws, Chapter 13, Article 5, Section 7, approved special legislation which describes aforementioned “Opportunity Stie” as including the area bounded by Shingle Creek Parkway from Hennepin County State-Aid Highway 10 to Summit Drive North; Summit Drive North from Shingle Creek Parkway to marked Trunk Highway 100; marked Trunk Highway 100 from Summit Drive North to Hennepin County State-Aid Highway 10; and Hennepin County State-Aid Highway 10 from marked Trunk Highway 100 to Shingle Creek Parkway, together with internal and adjacent roads and rights of way; WHEREAS, the aforementioned Section provides that the TIF districts established under this authority are deemed to meet all of the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.174, subdivision 10, and that Minnesota Statutes, section 469.176, subdivision 4j does not apply to the district, which requires that 90 percent of the increment be spent on correcting blight and similar type conditions; WHEREAS, the aforementioned Section provides that each the special legislation is not effective until the local governing body of the City of Brookyln Center and its chief clerical officer complies with Minn. Stat., section 645.021, subds. 2 and 3; WHEREAS, under Minn. Stat., section 645.021, subds. 2 and 3, the City must approve the special legislation by resolution and the chief clerical officer must comply with certain filing and procedural requirements to demonstrate valid approval of the special legislation before the first day of the next regular session of the legislature. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Approval of special law. The City of Brooklyn Center hereby approves the provisions of 1st Special Session, 2025 Minn. Laws, Chapter 13, Article 5, Section 7. 2. Actions Required. The City Clerk and staff are authorized and directed to file with the Minnesota Secretary of State a certificate stating the essential facts necessary to valid approval Page 98 of 269 and to take all other actions necessary and appropriate to implement the terms of the special legislation. Adopted this _____ day of______, 2025. Page 99 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Jesse Anderson, Community Development Director THROUGH: Krystin Eldridge, Associate Planner BY: Krystin Eldridge, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Resolution Acknowledging and Accepting LCA Predevelopment Grant Funds for Amani Construction & Development, LLC for Townhomes at the 5400 block of Brooklyn Blvd Requested Council Action: - Motion to Approve a Resolution Accepting LCA Predevelopment Grant Funds for Amani Construction & Development, LLC for Townhomes at the 5400 block of Brooklyn Blvd Background: On January 27, 2025, Amani Construction & Development (the “Developer”) submitted a proposal for purchase and development of the EDA-own property located at 54XX Brooklyn Boulevard. The Subject Property is comprised of three lots located south of 55th Avenue North and formerly addressed as 5415, 5407, and 5401 Brooklyn Boulevard that were re- platted in 2019 into an approximately 1.13 acres site. The developer proposes construction of an 11-unit townhouse development. The Council generally supported the effort with the understanding that a development agreement was required before the project could move forward. The City applied on behalf of Developer to the Metropolitan Council’s LCA’s Predevelopment fund to address activities related directly to development of the site, prior to beginning construction. The grant is allocated every year in two rounds and is highly competitive for real estate development. The Developer was awarded predevelopment funding to assist in activities like acquisition, architectural design, and financial modeling. Metropolitan Council has awarded Amani Construction for $152,500. Metropolitan Council's Livable Communities Grants offers the grant programs below: • The Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) supports development and redevelopment projects that link housing, jobs and services and use community and regional infrastructure efficiently. • The LCDA – Transit Oriented Development (LCDA-TOD) grants are focused on high density projects that contribute to a mix of uses in the TOD-eligible area. TOD-eligible areas can be along light rail, commuter rail, bus rapid transit, and high frequency bus corridors. • The Pre-development grants are for teams who are defining or redefining a project that will support Livable Communities and Imagine 2050 goals. Page 100 of 269 • The Policy Development program provides funding to participating cities to support locally adopted policies that influence physical development and further both LCA and Imagine 2050 goals with an emphasis on equitable development. • The Tax Base Revitalization Account (TBRA) helps clean up contaminated land and buildings for subsequent development. These grants are intended to provide the greatest public benefit for the money spent, strengthen the local tax base, and create and preserve jobs and/or affordable housing. TBRA has three different funding opportunities: Contamination Cleanup, Site Investigation, and SEED. • The Local Housing Incentives Account (LHIA) helps expand and preserve lifecycle and affordable housing, both rented and owned. The Metropolitan Council provides funding for development to foster economic growth, by increasing density, adding new housing or jobs, minimizing climate impact, or further equity outcomes and mitigating specific barriers to access for historically marginalized populations. The City encouraged Developer to apply for this grant. Recommended Action: City staff recommend that the Council execute the Resolution Accepting LCA Predevelopment Grant Funds for Amani Construction & Development, LLC for Townhomes at the 5400 block of Brooklyn Blvd. Budget Issues: This is a pass through grant and does not involve city funds. Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution Accepting Funds for Amani Construction- Unsigned 2. Metropolitan Council Community Development Committee Report 3. Amani Construction Webgrants application Page 101 of 269 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. _______________ RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING AW ARD ED FUNDS FOR LIV ABLE COMMUNITIES ACT LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT FUNDING AND AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FUNDS FOR AMANI CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT FOR 54XX BROOKLYN BOULEVARD WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota was a participant in the Livable Communities Act ("LCA") Local Housing Incentives Account Program for 2025, as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and was therefore eligible to apply for Livable Communities Demonstration Account ("LCDA") funds; and WHEREAS, only a limited amount of grant funding is available through the Metropolitan Council's LCA initiatives during each funding cycle and the Metropolitan Council has determined it is appropriate to allocate those scarce grant funds only to eligible projects that would not occur without the availability of LCA grant funding; and WHEREAS, the City has identified proposed projects within the City that meet LCDA purposes and criteria and the proposal submitted by Amani Construction and Development for a project located at 54XX & Brooklyn Boulevard is consistent with and promotes the purposes of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act and the policies of the Metropolitan Council's adopted metropolitan development guide; and WHEREAS, the City has traditionally supported grant applications by agreeing to act as legal sponsor for the project; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota formally identified the need for Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding and authorized City staff to submit on behalf of the City an application to said account for Amani Construction and Development on July 28, 2025 and under City Council Resolution No. 2025-068; and, WHEREAS, the City-supported by Amani Construction and Development for a project located at 54XX & Brooklyn Boulevard was ultimately awarded $152,500 in LCDA grant funds on September 10, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City acknowledges LCDA grants are intended to fund projects or project components that can serve as models, examples, or prototypes for development or redevelopment projects elsewhere in the region, and therefore represents that the proposed project or key components of the proposed project can be replicated in other metropolitan-area communities; and WHEREAS, the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and Page 102 of 269 RESOLUTION NO. _______________ regulations as stated in the grant agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The development proposed by Amani Construction and Development for a project located at 54XX & Brooklyn Boulevard contains components for which LCDA funding was awarded and: a. Will not occur solely through private or other public investment within the reasonably foreseeable future; and b. Will occur within the term of the grant award two years for Development grants expiring December 31st, 2027. 2. It authorizes its City Manager to accept the awarded funds on behalf of the City for the application for the Fall 2025 funding cycle for Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds, for the project components identified in the application, and to execute such agreements as may be necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City. October 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 103 of 269 Page 104 of 269 Page 105 of 269 Page 106 of 269 Page 107 of 269 Page 108 of 269 Page 109 of 269 Page 110 of 269 Page 111 of 269 Page 112 of 269 Page 113 of 269 Page 114 of 269 Page 115 of 269 Page 116 of 269 Page 117 of 269 Page 118 of 269 Page 119 of 269 Page 120 of 269 Page 121 of 269 Page 122 of 269 Page 123 of 269 Page 124 of 269 Page 125 of 269 Page 126 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Ian Alexander, Economic Development Manager, Amy Loegering, Economic Development Coordinator THROUGH: Jesse Anderson, Community Development Director BY: Amy Loegering, Economic Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Resolution in Support of an Application to the Minnesota Brownfield Gap Financing Grant Program for Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment for the Amani Construction & Development Townhomes Project. Requested Council Action: - Motion to Approve a Resolution in support of an application to the Minnesota Brownfield Gap Financing Grant Program for Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessment for the Amani Construction & Development Townhomes project. Background: On January 27, 2025, Amani Construction & Development (the “Developer”) brought forward a proposal for purchase and development of the EDA-own property located at 54XX Brooklyn Boulevard (the “Subject Property”). The Subject Property is comprised of three lots located south of 55th Avenue North and formerly addressed as 5415, 5407, and 5401 Brooklyn Boulevard that were re-platted in 2019 into an approximately 1.13 acre site. The Developer proposes construction of an 11-unit for-sale townhouse development. The Council generally supported the effort with the understanding that a development agreement was required before the project could move forward. The Developer is seeking funding to assist with Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessment. The City would apply on behalf of Developer to the Minnesota Brownfields Gap Financing Program. The grant program operates on a rolling basis. Staff recommends that City Council approve a resolution in support of an application to the Minnesota Brownfield Gap Financing Grant Program for Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessment for the Amani Construction & Development Townhomes project at the Subject Property. Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Page 127 of 269 Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution re Brownfield Grant Page 128 of 269 Member ________________introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- ________ RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A GRANT FROM THE MINNESOTA BROWNFIELDS GAP FINANCING GRANT PROGRAM FOR PHASE I AND PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FOR THE ARMANI CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT TOWNHOMES PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center supports the Armani Construction & Development Townhomes Project; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Brownfields Gap Financing Program (the “Program”) permits funding for, among other things, Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment; and WHEREAS, Armani Construction & Development desires to obtain funding for Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessment through the Program, and WHEREAS, the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to adequately manage a Program grant and; WHEREAS, the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, after appropriate examination and due consideration, the governing body of the City: 1. Finds that it is in the best interests of the City’s development goals and priorities to apply for a Minnesota Brownfield Gap Financing Program grant to fund Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessment for the Armani Construction & Development Townhomes Project. 2. Finds that the Minnesota Brownfield Gap Financing Program grant funds may be used for this purpose. 3. Authorizes the City Manager to submit on behalf of the City an application to the Minnesota Brownfields Gap Financing Program for grant funds for this purpose. Date: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against the same: Page 129 of 269 Whereupon said resolution as declared duly passed and adopted. Page 130 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Reggie Edwards, City Manager THROUGH: BY: Angela Holm, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Resolution Providing for the Issuance and Sale of General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A in the Proposed Aggregate Principal Amount of $6,180,000 and Obligating the City to be Bound By and Use the Provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 446A.086 to Guarantee the Payment of the Principal and Interest on Certain Bonds and Authorizing the Execution of a Credit Enhancement Program Agreement Requested Council Action: - Motion to Approve a Resolution Providing for the Issuance and Sale of General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A in the Proposed Aggregate Principal Amount of $6,180,000 and Obligating the City to be Bound By and Use the Provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 446A.086 to Guarantee the Payment of the Principal and Interest on Certain Bonds and Authorizing the Execution of a Credit Enhancement Program Agreement Background: The proposed bond issuance will fund various utility improvements projects throughout the city, including: Well No. 3; Water Treatment Plant HSP (backwash) Well and Lift Station Roof Replacements Water Treatment Plant Catwalk Improvements Well No. 11: Well and Pumphouse Lift Station No. 9 Rehabilitation Lift Station No. 9 Force Main Replacement Golf Course Area Sanitary Rehabilitation These projects were contemplated in the 2025 Capital Improvement Plan as approved by City Council in December 2024. The estimated total cost of these projects is $6,350,000. Of this total cost, $6,180,000 will be financed through bond proceeds and paid from utility revenues. The remainder ($170,000) will be paid by existing funds in the sanitary sewer and water funds. Budget Issues: The utility funds pay for infrastructure replacement and improvement costs through utility charges. Issuing debt to provide funding for these improvements will allow the City to minimize the impact on those charges. The 2025A issue includes $2.85 million Page 131 of 269 in water utility costs and $3.33 million in sanitary sewer utility costs that will be funded through water and sanitary sewer utility fees. A copy of the pre-sale report prepared by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers, is attached. This report includes projected debt schedules for the bond. As noted in the pre-sale report, the City will submit an application to the State of Minnesota to receive credit enhancement from the State. This will bring the City's current rating of "AA" to "AAA", which should result in interest savings over the term of the bond. Competitive proposals will be received by the City's financial advisor on November 24, 2025 and a resolution to award sale of the bonds will occur that evening at the regular Council meeting. The estimated closing date is December 18, 2025 with funds received at that time. The City has sufficient liquidity to start or continue construction work on these projects. Bond proceeds will be used to reimburse the City for preliminary expenses (such as engineering costs), as well as existing or future construction costs. Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Brooklyn Center GO 2025A SET SALE RESOLUTION 2. PreSaleReportRevised.Brooklyn Center.2025A Page 132 of 269 1 4902-1843-1337.3 RESOLUTION NO. ____ RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2025A IN THE PROPOSED AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $6,180,000 AND OBLIGATING THE CITY TO BE BOUND BY AND USE THE PROVISIONS OF MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 446A.086 TO GUARANTEE THE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST ON CERTAIN BONDS AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CREDIT ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM AGREEMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the “Council”) of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (the “City”) as follows: Section 1. Bonds Authorized 1.01. It is hereby found, determined and declared that the City should issue its General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds (the “Bonds”) in the approximate principal amount of $6,180,000, in order to finance various utility improvements, including without limitation the Well No. 3: water treatment plant HSP (backwash), well and lift station roof replacements, catwalk at water treatment plant, Well No. 11: well and pumphouse, Lift Station No. 9: rehabilitation, Lift Station No. 9: force main replacement, golf course area sanitary rehabilitation (collectively, the “Projects”), including costs of issuance of the Bonds, subject to further details regarding the sale of the Bonds to be set forth in a resolution to be considered by the City Council at a subsequent meeting. 1.02. City staff are authorized and directed to take all other actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution. 1.03. The City desires to participate in the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority Credit Enhancement Program (the “Credit Enhancement Program”) with the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority (the “PFA”) to provide credit enhancement for the Bonds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 446A.086 (the “PFA Act”). Section 2. Authority of Municipal Advisor. Ehlers and Associates, Inc. (the “Municipal Advisor”) is authorized and directed to negotiate the sale of the Bonds. The City Council will meet on Monday, November 24, 2025, or another date selected by City staff, to consider proposals on the Bonds and take any other appropriate action with respect to the Bonds. Section 3. Authority of Bond Counsel. The law firm of Kutak Rock LLP, as bond counsel for the City (“Bond Counsel”), is authorized to act as bond counsel and to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents, certificates and instruments relating to the Bonds. The officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to assist Bond Counsel in the preparation of such documents, certificates, and instruments. Page 133 of 269 2 4902-1843-1337.3 Section 4. Covenants. In the resolution awarding the sale of the Bonds, the City Council will set forth the covenants and undertakings required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 444 and 475, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). Section 5. Official Statement. In connection with the sale of the Bonds, the officers or employees of the City are authorized and directed to cooperate with the Municipal Advisor and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. Section 6. Credit Enhancement Application; Fee; Agreement. The Mayor and City Administrator, or designee, are hereby authorized to submit, on behalf of the City, an application to the PFA to participate in the Credit Enhancement Program with the PFA along with a nonrefundable application fee in the amount of $500.00, and to enter into an agreement with the PFA (the “Agreement”), all in accordance with and as required by the Act. The Mayor and City Administrator, or designee, are hereby authorized to execute any and all applicable forms prescribed by the PFA in connection with the Credit Enhancement Program. Section 7. Guarantee of Payment. (a) The City hereby covenants and obligates itself to notify the PFA of a potential default in the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, and to use the provisions of the Act to guarantee payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds when due. The City further covenants to deposit with the registrar or any successor paying agent 3 days prior to the date on which a payment is due, an amount sufficient to make that payment or to notify the PFA that it will be unable to make all or a portion of that payment. The registrar for the Bonds is authorized and directed to notify the City Administrator and the PFA if it becomes aware of a potential default in the payment of principal or interest on the Bonds or if, on the day 2 business days prior to the date a payment is due on the Bonds, there are insufficient funds to make that payment on deposit in the registrar. The City understands that as a result of its covenant to be bound by the provisions of the Act and the PFA Act, the provisions of those laws shall be binding as long as the Bonds remain outstanding. (b) The City further covenants to comply with all procedures now or hereafter established by the PFA and the Commissioner of Management and Budget of the State of Minnesota pursuant to the Act, and otherwise to take such actions as necessary to comply with that section. Section 8. Declaration of Official Intent to Reimburse Expenditures. 8.01 The Internal Revenue Service has issued Treas. Reg. § 1.150-2 (the “Reimbursement Regulations”) providing that proceeds of tax-exempt bonds used to reimburse prior expenditures will not be deemed spent unless certain requirements are met; the City expects to incur certain expenditures with respect to the Projects that may be financed temporarily from sources other than bonds, and reimbursed from the proceeds of the tax-exempt Bonds in a principal amount of up to $6,180,000. Page 134 of 269 3 4902-1843-1337.3 8.02 The City has determined to make a declaration of official intent (the “Declaration”) to reimburse certain costs with respect to the Projects from proceeds of the Bonds in accordance with the Reimbursement Regulations. 8.03 All reimbursed expenditures will be capital expenditures, costs of issuance of the Bonds, or other expenditures eligible for reimbursement under Section 1.150-2(d)(3) of the Reimbursement Regulations. 8.04 This Declaration has been made not later than sixty (60) days after payment of any original expenditure to be subject to a reimbursement allocation with respect to the proceeds of the Bonds, except for the following expenditures: (a) costs of issuance of bonds; (b) costs in an amount not in excess of $100,000 or 5% of the proceeds of an issue; or (c) “preliminary expenditures” up to an amount not in excess of 20% of the aggregate issue price of the issue or issues that finance or are reasonably expected by the City to finance the project for which the preliminary expenditures were incurred. The term “preliminary expenditures” includes architectural, engineering, surveying, bond issuance, and similar costs that are incurred prior to commencement of acquisition, construction or rehabilitation of a project, other than land acquisition, site preparation, and similar costs incident to commencement of construction. 8.05 This Declaration is an expression of the reasonable expectations of the City based on the facts and circumstances known to the City as of the date hereof. The anticipated original expenditures for the Projects and the principal amount of the Bonds described herein are consistent with the City’s budgetary and financial circumstances. No sources other than proceeds of the Bonds to be issued by the City are, or are reasonably expected to be, reserved, allocated on a long- term basis, or otherwise set aside pursuant to the City’s budget or financial policies to pay such expenditures. 8.06 This Declaration is intended to constitute a declaration of official intent for purposes of the Reimbursement Regulations. Approved this October 13, 2025 by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA ______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ City Clerk Page 135 of 269 Page 136 of 269 • • • • • • • • • Page 137 of 269 Page 138 of 269 Page 139 of 269 • • Page 140 of 269 Page 141 of 269 City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota $6,180,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 50bps Sources & Uses Dated 12/18/2025 | Delivered 12/18/2025 Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $6,180,000.00 Total Sources $6,180,000.00 Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (1.200%)74,160.00 Costs of Issuance 84,000.00 Deposit to Project Construction Fund 6,018,396.00 Rounding Amount 3,444.00 Total Uses $6,180,000.00 2025A GO Utility Rev Bond | SINGLE PURPOSE | 10/ 8/2025 | 10:55 AM Page 142 of 269 City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota $6,180,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 50bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 12/18/2025 ----- 08/01/2026 --128,695.78 128,695.78 - 02/01/2027 515,000.00 3.150%103,880.00 618,880.00 747,575.78 08/01/2027 --95,768.75 95,768.75 - 02/01/2028 555,000.00 3.100%95,768.75 650,768.75 746,537.50 08/01/2028 --87,166.25 87,166.25 - 02/01/2029 570,000.00 3.100%87,166.25 657,166.25 744,332.50 08/01/2029 --78,331.25 78,331.25 - 02/01/2030 590,000.00 3.150%78,331.25 668,331.25 746,662.50 08/01/2030 --69,038.75 69,038.75 - 02/01/2031 605,000.00 3.200%69,038.75 674,038.75 743,077.50 08/01/2031 --59,358.75 59,358.75 - 02/01/2032 625,000.00 3.300%59,358.75 684,358.75 743,717.50 08/01/2032 --49,046.25 49,046.25 - 02/01/2033 645,000.00 3.400%49,046.25 694,046.25 743,092.50 08/01/2033 --38,081.25 38,081.25 - 02/01/2034 670,000.00 3.500%38,081.25 708,081.25 746,162.50 08/01/2034 --26,356.25 26,356.25 - 02/01/2035 690,000.00 3.650%26,356.25 716,356.25 742,712.50 08/01/2035 --13,763.75 13,763.75 - 02/01/2036 715,000.00 3.850%13,763.75 728,763.75 742,527.50 Total $6,180,000.00 -$1,266,398.28 $7,446,398.28 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $36,443.17 Average Life 5.897 Years Average Coupon 3.4749952% Net Interest Cost (NIC)3.6784901% True Interest Cost (TIC)3.6975304% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 3.4645117% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)3.9662874% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 3.4749952% Weighted Average Maturity 5.897 Years 2025A GO Utility Rev Bond | SINGLE PURPOSE | 10/ 8/2025 | 10:55 AM Page 143 of 269 City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota $6,180,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 50bps Detail Costs Of Issuance Dated 12/18/2025 | Delivered 12/18/2025 COSTS OF ISSUANCE DETAIL Municipal Advisor $43,000.00 Bond Counsel $20,000.00 Rating Agency Fee $20,000.00 Miscellaneous $1,000.00 TOTAL $84,000.00 2025A GO Utility Rev Bond | SINGLE PURPOSE | 10/ 8/2025 | 10:55 AM Page 144 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager THROUGH: BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Approving a Lease Agreement Between the City of Brooklyn Center and LOGIS through December 31, 2028 Requested Council Action: - Motion to Approve a Resolution Approving a Lease Agreement Between the City of Brooklyn Center and LOGIS through December 31, 2028 Background: Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. LOGIS Lease 2. Resolution 2025- LOGIS Lease Agreement Page 145 of 269 LG100\2\1033411.v1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT This First Amendment to Lease Agreement (this “First Amendment”) is made this 13 day of October, 2025 by and between LOGIS (Local Government Information Systems), a Minnesota joint powers entity (the “Tenant”) and the City of Brooklyn Center, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”). WHEREAS, the City and the Tenant entered into that certain Lease Agreement dated January 12, 2016 (the “Lease”) providing for the Tenant to lease a portion of a City building located within the City’s Police Department; and WHEREAS, the Lease expires on December 31, 2025; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to extend the term of the Lease; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: 1. Section 1 of the Lease is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Term. A. City hereby leases the Leased Premises to Tenant, and Tenant hereby leases the same from City, for a term beginning January 12, 2016 and ending on December 31, 2028 (the “Term”). B. Prior to the end of the Term, the City will negotiate in good faith with Tenant for additional lease terms as long as the facility and space are available for lease by the City and requested by Tenant. 2. Section 2 of the Lease is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. Rental. Tenant shall pay to City $20.00 per square foot in rent for area defined as Leased Premises until December 31, 2025. On January 1, 2026, the rent shall be increased to $27 per square foot. Rent shall be payable by Tenant to City in 12 monthly installments plus the cost of electrical utilities, to be billed separately to Tenant. Page 146 of 269 LG100\2\1033411.v1 A. Each installment payment shall be due in advance on the first day of each calendar month during the Term to City at: City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 or at such other place designated by written notice from City to Tenant. The rental payment amount for any partial calendar months included in the Term shall be prorated on a daily basis. B. When the Emergency Area is required by Tenant for emergency use, Tenant shall pay an annual lease rate of $10.00 per square foot pro- rated for the number of days or partial days of usage plus an operating expense of $5.00 per square foot for the period of usage. These rates shall remain in effect until December 31, 2025. On January 1, 2026, Tenant shall pay an annual lease rate of $13.00 per square foot pro- rated for the number of days or partial days of usage plus an operating expense of $7.00 per square foot for the period of usage. Said Emergency Area rent is payable with the first monthly rent payment due more than one month after such emergency use. C. At the conclusion of the Term of this Lease, it is anticipated that space within the Leased Premises will need to be rented by Tenant from the City in order to preserve space for Tenant’s existing fiber and associated data closet which serves multiple Tenant members in the region. The space that will need to be rented by Tenant will consist of a smaller footprint that will comprise approximately 20 square feet. The City will negotiate in good faith a lease with Tenant for this particular space. 3. Section 21 of the Lease is hereby amended as follows: Any notice required or permitted under this Lease shall be deemed sufficiently given or served if sent by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: If to City: Reginald Edwards, City Manager City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 If to Tenant: Page 147 of 269 LG100\2\1033411.v1 Chris Miller, Executive Director LOGIS 5750 Duluth Street Golden Valley, MN 55422 4. Miscellaneous. Except as amended by this Amendment, the Lease shall remain in full force and effect. (Remainder of this page intentionally left blank.) Page 148 of 269 LG100\2\1033411.v1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment to Lease Agreement as of the date written above. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER By: ________________________________ April Graves Its: Mayor By: ______________________________ Reginald Edwards Its: City Manager LOGIS By: _________________________________ Chris Miller Its: Executive Director Page 149 of 269 Member ______ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-________ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (LOGIS) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2028 WHEREAS, the City and LOGIS entered into a Lease Agreement dated January 12, 2016 (the “Lease”) providing for the Tenant to lease a portion of a City building located within the City’s Police Department; and WHEREAS, the Lease expires on December 31, 2025; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to extend the term of the Lease and modify lease terms; and WHEREAS, the terms and conditions set forth in the lease attached hereto, as Exhibit 1, appear to be reasonable and proper. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the Mayor and City Manager be and hereby are authorized to execute the lease attached hereto as Exhibit 1 on behalf of the City of Brooklyn Center with such finalization of the exact language to be set forth in the Exhibits as are deemed acceptable by the City Manager to finalize the exact descriptions set forth in the Exhibits. October 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 150 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Elizabeth Heyman, Director of Public Works THROUGH: BY: Elizabeth Heyman, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Hennepin Recycling Group (HRG) Update Requested Council Action: - Motion to accept the presentation. Background: The purpose of this presentation is to share an update on the Hennepin Recycling Group (HRG) ahead of Recycling Utility rates being proposed at the joint Council and Finance Committee meeting on October 20th, 2025. Tim Pratt, from Hennepin Recycling Group (HRG), will give a presentation to update the Council on: • Organics Recycling • Curbside Bulky Waste Cleanup • 2026 HRG Budget Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Hennepin_Recycling_Group_Update Page 151 of 269 Page 152 of 269 Page 153 of 269 Page 154 of 269 Page 155 of 269 Page 156 of 269 Page 157 of 269 Page 158 of 269 Page 159 of 269 Page 160 of 269 Page 161 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: THROUGH: BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Proclamation Declaring October as Domestic Violence Awareness Month in the City of Brooklyn Center Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve the Proclamation Background: Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proclamation-Domestic Violence Awareness Month Page 162 of 269 PROCLAMATION DECLARING OCTOBER AS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, National Domestic Violence Awareness Month (DVAM) was established in 1989, DVAM is an annual campaign to raise awareness and educate communities about relationship abuse, support survivors, and prevent violence; and WHEREAS, Throughout the month, organizations and individuals unite to remember victims, uplift survivors, and promote healthy, safe relationships; and WHEREAS, These efforts are often symbolized by the color purple, a reminder of our collective responsibility to end domestic violence and build communities rooted in safety, respect, and healing; and WHEREAS, Brooklyn Center asks residents and staff to wear purple on Friday, October 17th, to bring awareness to domestic violence. Domestic Violence prevention and support resources are available on the City’s website and in the second-floor corridor. NOW, THEREFORE, I, April Graves, Mayor of the City of Brooklyn Center, do hereby declare October to be Breast Cancer Awareness Month in the City of Brooklyn Center. October 13th, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Page 163 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: THROUGH: BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: Proclamation Declaring October as Breast Cancer Awareness Month in the City of Brooklyn Center Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve the Proclamation Background: Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proclamation-Breast Cancer Awareness Month Page 164 of 269 PROCLAMATION DECLARING OCTOBER AS BREAST CANCER AWARENESS MONTH IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, The Breast Cancer Awareness campaign began in 1985 as a week-long awareness campaign by the American Cancer Society, which has grown into a month-long event; and WHEREAS, People of every country, race, ethnic group, and income level are affected by breast cancer. In the U.S., the percentage of women diagnosed with breast cancer has been slowly rising for the past couple of decades; and WHEREAS, With routine mammogram screening and follow-up testing, the disease can be detected early when it can be most effectively treated and save lives; and WHEREAS, Being aware of the health information, education, treatment and support methods available can help individuals find and receive the appropriate care and resources they need to improve their quality of life; and WHEREAS, Breast Cancer Awareness Month is an international health campaign that’s held every October and aims to promote screening and reduce the risk of the disease, which affects 2.3 million women worldwide. Noticed widely for its pink ribbon color theme, there are also specific dates designed to raise awareness of specific groups within the breast cancer community during the month of October. NOW, THEREFORE, I, April Graves, Mayor of the City of Brooklyn Center, do hereby declare October to be Breast Cancer Awareness Month in the City of Brooklyn Center. October 13th, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Page 165 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Xiong Thao, Housing and Community Standards Manager THROUGH: Jesse Anderson, Community Development Director BY: Xiong Thao, Housing and Community Standards Manager SUBJECT: Public Hearings on Proposed Special Assessments for Nuisance Abatement Costs, Administrative Fines/Citations, Tall Grass and Weed Abatement Costs, Dead/Disease Tree Abatement Costs, and Administratively Registered Vacant Properties. Requested Council Action: -Motion to open the public hearing for Administrative Citation; -Motion to close the public hearing for Administrative Citations; and -Motion to Adopt Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Administrative Citations to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls. -Motion to open the public hearing for Diseased Tree Removal Costs; -Motion to close the public hearing for Diseased Tree Removal Costs; and -Motion to Adopt Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Diseased Tree Removal Costs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls. -Motion to open the public hearing for Weed Removal Costs; -Motion to close the public hearing for Weed Removal Costs; and -Motion to Adopt Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Weed Removal Costs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls. -Motion to open the public hearing for Nuisance Abatement Costs; -Motion to close the public hearing for Nuisance Abatement Costs; and -Motion to Adopt Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Nuisance Abatement Costs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls. -Motion to open the public hearing for Administratively Registering Vacant Properties; -Motion to close the public hearing for Administratively Registering Vacant Properties; and -Motion to Adopt Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Administratively Registering Vacant Properties to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls. Background: Five (5) Public Hearings are scheduled for October 13, 2025 to consider certification of proposed special assessments. The Notice of Public Hearing was posted in the City’s official newspaper, Sun Post, on September 25, 2025. All potentially affected property owners have been notified by mail of the date of the Public Hearing and the amount of the proposed special assessments. As of October 7, 2025, no formal appeal has been Page 166 of 269 made to City staff. The following is a brief summary of the minimum process involved in City-facilitated abatements. • Once a violation is verified or correction is identified, a written compliance notice is provided to the owner of record. In addition to notifying the owner of record, in certain cases, properties may be posted or other responsible parties may be notified. • A follow up inspection is conducted to verify that the property was brought into compliance with the code. • If compliance has not been achieved, the city will send additional notices, or take corrective actions to remove the public nuisance or hazard, depending on the nature of the issue. • In the case of an abatement, the city bills the owner of record for the portion of costs the city incurred directly related to the abatement action. A service charge is applied to help recover administrative costs associated with the abatement process such as time spent on inspections, notifications, invoicing, overhead, etc. • The costs of the abatements are recorded as pending special assessments and this information is available to the public. • When a property is sold, title companies, real estate agents, or other parties are obligated to conduct property searches to determine the pending and levied special assessment amounts. Payments of any pending or levied special assessment should be negotiated by the sellers and buyers as part of the sales transactions. For administrative citations/fines, an appeal process is prescribed by City Ordinance Chapter 18. Information about the appeal process and timeframes is provided with the citation. Properties that are vacant for more than 30 days and the owner has not registered the property after two notices, staff will administratively register the property as vacant. The owner will have to pay the inspection fee and pass the vacant building inspection to obtain a certificate of re-occupancy. Public Hearing Process Staff recommends that the City Council conduct the hearings concurrently. The attached resolutions certifying the assessments to the Hennepin County tax rolls are provided for Council consideration upon closing of the Public Hearings. If any additional property owner files an appeal with the City Clerk prior to the Public Hearing, or should any person appear at the hearing and object to an assessment, staff recommends that the Council refer any substantive objections to staff for a report back to the Council at a continued hearing to take place in two weeks. This would provide Page 167 of 269 staff time to research the details of the items and assemble documentation for Council's consideration. If any assessments are removed from the proposed levy roll, it is recommended that the Council consider adopting the remaining proposed assessments. If an appeal for a specific property is filed within district court, the City Attorney will advise the Council of options for handling the dispute and potential litigation issues. Payment Options available to Property Owners Once an assessment roll is adopted by the Council, the owner of each property has the following options: 1. Pay the entire amount of the special assessment, without interest, between October 14, 2025 and November 21, 2025. 2. If payments are made with property taxes, the first payment will be due with taxes in 2026. The total principal will be payable in annual installments for the period stated on the levy roll and as indicated below. Interest of 7 percent is accrued on the unpaid balance. Nuisance Abatement Costs One Year Administrative Fines/Citations One Year Tall Grass and Weed Abatements One Year Administratively Registered Vacant Properties One Year Dead and Diseased Tree Abatements Five Years Partial prepayments: The County has stated that after an assessment is certified partial payments can't be accepted. However, they have granted Brooklyn Center permission to accept partial payments prior to the assessments being certified to Hennepin County. The Certification occurs on December 1 annually. Therefore, any current assessment could allow for the assessment amount to be reduced with a partial payment prior to November 21, 2025. Budget Issues: These fees help recover some costs the City incurs related to services provided to specific properties. For accounting purposes, special assessments fees are included in the general fund as revenue. It is anticipated that these costs recovered through special assessments will be received in 2026, and are therefore included in the 2026 budget. The levy roll for administrative fines/citation totals $219,980.00. ($165.675.00 - 2024 total). The levy roll for weed destruction totals $19,120.00. ($17,661.25 - 2024 Page 168 of 269 total) The levy roll for dead/diseased tree removal totals $11,740.00. ($46,160.44 - 2024 total) The levy roll for abatements totals $28,530.00. ($76,399.55 - 2024 total) The levy roll for vacant property Registrations totals $17,250.00. ($800.00 – 2024 total) An updated list will be provided at the Council Meeting reflecting payments made by October 13, 2025. Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Public Hearing Notice 2. Assessment Resolutions 2025 3. 2025 Special Assessments List 4. 2025 Citations Page 169 of 269 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers of Brooklyn Center City Hall at 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, on Monday, October 13, 2025 at 7 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to hear and pass upon any objections to the proposed assessments for the following: DELINQUENT PUBLIC UTILITY ACCOUNTS Special Assessments are proposed for public utility charges to those tracts or parcels where such charges were delinquent as of July 31, 2025, and, after due notice to the property owner, remain unpaid, pursuant to City Ordinances, Section 4-105 and Section 4-201. DELINQUENT NUISANCE ABATEMENT ACCOUNTS It is proposed to assess the costs of delinquent abatement costs to those tracts or parcels where, pursuant to City Ordinance Section 12-1101, 12-1206, 12-1504 and in accordance with MS 429 and 463.251, abatement procedures were performed by order of City Inspectors and the cost for such abatement remains unpaid. DELINQUENT ADMINISTRATIVE FINES/CIT A TIO NS It is proposed to assess the costs of delinquent administrative fines/citations to those tracts or parcels where, pursuant to City Ordinance Section 18-204, 18-210 and in accordance with MS 429, delinquent administrative fines/citations were issued and the cost for such fines remains unpaid. DISEASED TREE REMOVAL COSTS It is proposed to assess the cost of diseased tree removal to those tracts or parcels where trees were removed by written agreement with the property owner or by order of the City Council pursuant to City Ordinances, Section 20-301 through 20-305 and in accordance with MS 429. DELINQUENT WEED REMOVAL ACCOUNTS It is proposed to assess the cost of noxious weed destruction to those tracts or parcels where, pursuant to City Ordinance Section 19-1601 through 19-1604 and in accordance with MS 429, noxious weeds were destroyed by order of the City Weed Inspector and the cost for such destruction remains unpaid. UTILITY REP AIR COSTS It is proposed to assess the cost of utility repairs to those tracts or parcels where, pursuant to City Ordinances, Section 04-201 through 04-305 service lines were repaired and the cost for such repairs remain unpaid. DELINQUENT ADMINISTRATIVE VACANT BUILDING REGISTRATIONS It is proposed to assess the cost of administratively registering vacant buildings to those tracts or parcels where, pursuant to City Ordinance Section 12-1504 and in accordance with MS 429, Page 170 of 269 administrative vacant building registration procedures were performed by order of the City Inspectors and the cost for such registration remains unpaid. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION FOR OBJECTIONS TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. No such appeal as to the amount of an assessment for a specific parcel of land may be made unless the owner has filed a written objection to that objection to that assessment, signed by the affected property owner, with the City Clerk prior to the hearing or has presented such a written objection to the presiding officer at the hearing. These assessments are now on file at City Hall and open to public inspection. Written or oral objections to the proposed assessments will be considered at this meeting, but the City Council may consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. AUXILIARY AIDS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours (4 days) in advance of the hearing. Please contact the City Clerk at 763-569-3300 to make arrangements. Shannon Pettit, City Clerk By order of the City Council Page 171 of 269 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DISEASED TREE REMOVAL COSTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has caused the removal of trees on certain properties within the City during 2025 under the authority of Minnesota Statutes, Section 18G.13, City Ordinance Section 20-301 through 20-306 and/or by written agreement with the owners of such property; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2025, certain tree removal costs remained unpaid; and WHEREAS, an assessment roll for unpaid accounts during 2025, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk, tabulating those properties where tree removal costs are to be assessed, together with the amounts proposed to be assessed to each property; and WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute authorizes the certification of delinquent tree removal costs to the County tax rolls for collection; and WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for tree removal costs. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The special assessment roll of tree removal costs incurred during the year 2025 is hereby adopted and certified as Levy No. 26005. 2. The special assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable in equal annual installments with interest thereon at 7.0 percent per annum, extending over a period of five years. The first of the installments shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 2026, and shall bear interest on the entire assessment from December 1, 2025 through December 31, 2026. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the certification of the assessment to the County Auditor pay the whole of the Page 172 of 269 RESOLUTION NO. _______________ assessment, to the City, without interest, if the entire assessment is paid on or before November 21, 2025. After November 22, 2025, he or she may pay the total special assessment, plus interest. Interest will accumulate from December 1, 2025 through the date of payment. Such payment must be made by the close of business November 21, 2025 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplication of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. October 13, 2025 __________________________________ Date Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________________ City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 173 of 269 Member introduced the following resolution and moves its adoption: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR WEEDS AND TALL GRASS REMOVAL COSTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has caused noxious weeds and tall grass to be cut down on properties within the City under the authority of Minnesota Statutes Section 18.78 and City Ordinance Section 19-1601 through 19-1604; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2025, certain weed destruction accounts for removal of said weeds and tall grass costs remained unpaid; and WHEREAS, an assessment roll for unpaid accounts from 2025, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk, tabulating those properties where unpaid weed destruction account costs are to be assessed to each property; and WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute authorizes the certification of delinquent weed destruction accounts to the County tax rolls for collection; and WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for weed destruction costs. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The special assessment roll of unpaid weed destruction accounts incurred during the year 2025 is hereby adopted and certified as Levy No. 26003. 2. The special assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 2024, in one annual installment with interest thereon at 7.0 percent per annum and shall bear interest on the entire assessment from December 1, 2025 through December 31, 2026. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the certification of the assessment to the County Auditor pay the whole of the assessment, to the City Treasurer, without interest, if the entire assessment is paid on or before November 21, 2025. After November 22, 2025, he or she may pay the total special assessment, plus interest. Interest will accumulate from December 1, 2025 through the date of payment. Such payment must be made by the close of business November 21, 2025 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Page 174 of 269 RESOLUTION NO. _______________ 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplication of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. October 13, 2025 ________________________________________ Date Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________________ City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 175 of 269 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT COSTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has caused abatement removal on certain properties within the City from September 16, 2023 thru September 17, 2025 under the authority of City Ordinance Section 12-1504 and 19-105 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 429 and/or by written agreement with the owners of such property; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2025, certain abatement accounts remained unpaid; and WHEREAS, an assessment roll for unpaid accounts from September 16, 2024 thru September 17, 2025, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk, tabulating those properties where abatement costs are to be assessed, together with the amounts proposed to be assessed to each property; and WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute authorizes the certification of delinquent abatement accounts to the County tax rolls for collection; and WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for abatement costs. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The special assessment roll of abatement costs incurred from September 16, 2024 thru September 17, 2025 is hereby adopted and certified as Levy No. 26004. 2. The special assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 2026, in one annual installment with interest thereon at 7.0 percent per annum and shall bear interest on the entire assessment from December 1, 2025 through December 31, 2026. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the certification of the assessment to the County Auditor pay the whole of the assessment, to the City Treasurer, without interest, if the entire assessment is paid on or before November 21, 2025. After November 22, 2025, he or she may pay the total special assessment, plus interest. Interest will accumulate from December 1, 2025 through the date of payment. Such payment must be made by the close of business November 21, 2025 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Page 176 of 269 RESOLUTION NO. _____________ 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplication of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. October 13, 2025 ______________________________ Date Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________________ City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 177 of 269 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE FINES/CITATION COSTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has caused Administrative Fines/Citation costs for certain properties within the City from September 16, 2024 thru September 17, 2025 under the authority of City Ordinance Section 18-204 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 429; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2025, certain Administrative Fines/Citation costs remained unpaid; and WHEREAS, an assessment roll for unpaid accounts from September 16, 2024 thru September 17, 2025, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk, tabulating those properties where Administrative Fines/Citation costs are to be assessed to each property; and WHEREAS, City Ordinance Section 18-210 and Minnesota State Statute authorizes the certification of certain delinquent Administrative Fines/Citation accounts to the County tax rolls for collection; and WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for Administrative Fines/Citation costs. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The special assessment roll of Administrative Fines/Citation costs incurred from September 16, 2024 thru September 17, 2025 is hereby adopted and certified as Levy No. 26002. 2. The special assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 2026, in one annual installment with interest thereon at 7.0 percent per annum and shall bear interest on the entire assessment from December 1, 2025 through December 31, 2026. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the certification of the assessment to the County Auditor pay the whole of the assessment, to the City Treasurer, without interest, if the entire assessment is paid on or before November 21, 2025. After November 22, 2025, he or she may pay the total special assessment, plus interest. Interest will accumulate from December1, 2025 through the date of payment. Such payment must be made by the close of business November 21, 2025 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Page 178 of 269 RESOLUTION NO. _____________ 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplication of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. October 13, 2025 ________________________________ Date Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________________ City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 179 of 269 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR ADMINISTRATIVELY REGISTERED VACANT PROPERTIES COSTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has caused administratively registered vacant properties on certain properties within the City from September 16, 2024 thru September 17, 2025 under the authority of City Ordinance Section 12-1504 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 429 and/or by written agreement with the owners of such property; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2025, certain administratively registered vacant property accounts remained unpaid; and WHEREAS, an assessment roll for unpaid accounts from September 16, 2024 thru September 17, 2025, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk, tabulating those properties where registered vacant property costs are to be assessed, together with the amounts proposed to be assessed to each property; and WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute authorizes the certification of vacant property registration accounts to the County tax rolls for collection; and WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for abatement costs. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The special assessment roll of administratively vacant building costs incurred from September 16, 2024 thru September 17, 2025 is hereby adopted and certified as Levy No. 26006. 2. The special assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 2026, in one annual installment with interest thereon at 7.0 percent per annum and shall bear interest on the entire assessment from December 1, 2025 through December 31, 2026. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the certification of the assessment to the County Auditor pay the whole of the assessment, to the City Treasurer, without interest, if the entire assessment is paid on or before November 21, 2025. After November 22, 2025, he or she may pay the total special assessment, plus interest. Interest will accumulate from December 1, 2025 through the date of payment. Such payment must be made by the close of business November 21, 2025 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Page 180 of 269 RESOLUTION NO. _____________ 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplication of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. October 13, 2025 ______________________________ Date Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________________ City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 181 of 269 Page 182 of 269 Page 183 of 269 Page 184 of 269 Page 185 of 269 Page 186 of 269 Amended Special Assessment Certified Roll (Admin Fines/Citations) 2025 Administrative Penalty/Citation Printed October 08, 2025 Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year Levy No.Property ID Pending AmountProperty Address Capital Interest Charge Special Assessment Charge Total Amount Certified 26002 01-118-21-12-0036 6,050.006006 Camden Ave N 10.00 30.00 6,090.00 26002 01-118-21-13-0040 100.005834 Camden Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 01-118-21-21-0020 100.005931 Colfax Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 01-118-21-21-0022 100.005919 Colfax Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 01-118-21-21-0066 300.006019 Camden Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 01-118-21-21-0106 100.005932 Colfax Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 01-118-21-22-0017 9,300.005951 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 9,340.00 26002 01-118-21-22-0032 100.006035 Dupont Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 01-118-21-22-0074 250.006032 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 290.00 26002 01-118-21-22-0083 6,000.006007 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 6,040.00 26002 01-118-21-23-0014 700.005700 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 740.00 26002 01-118-21-23-0026 600.001108 57th Ave N 10.00 30.00 640.00 26002 01-118-21-23-0032 5,050.005725 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 5,090.00 26002 01-118-21-23-0075 100.005807 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 01-118-21-23-0100 100.005818 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 01-118-21-24-0018 1,100.005849 Colfax Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,140.00 26002 01-118-21-24-0022 50.005817 Colfax Ave N 10.00 30.00 90.00 26002 01-118-21-24-0037 200.005730 Aldrich Ave N 10.00 30.00 240.00 26002 01-118-21-24-0066 1,600.00816 57th Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,640.00 26002 01-118-21-24-0097 50.005835 Bryant Ave N 10.00 30.00 90.00 26002 01-118-21-24-0105 1,000.005711 Camden Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,040.00 26002 01-118-21-31-0006 1,900.00801 57th Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,940.00 26002 01-118-21-31-0011 300.005637 Bryant Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 01-118-21-31-0112 1,700.005600 Aldrich Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,740.00 26002 01-118-21-32-0010 300.005556 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 01-118-21-32-0035 100.005538 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 01-118-21-32-0059 600.001424 55th Ave N 10.00 30.00 640.00 26002 01-118-21-32-0062 1,900.005524 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,940.00 26002 01-118-21-32-0066 200.005568 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 240.00 26002 01-118-21-32-0078 1,500.005637 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,540.00 26002 01-118-21-32-0096 100.005507 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 01-118-21-33-0008 100.005345 Fremont Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 01-118-21-33-0011 600.005336 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 640.00 26002 01-118-21-33-0012 100.005330 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 01-118-21-33-0017 100.005301 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 01-118-21-33-0023 2,400.005337 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 2,440.00 26002 01-118-21-33-0055 400.005421 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 440.00 26002 01-118-21-33-0067 7,600.005430 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 7,640.00 26002 01-118-21-33-0074 100.005451 Dupont Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 01-118-21-33-0086 400.005424 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 440.00 26002 01-118-21-33-0098 100.005415 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 01-118-21-33-0109 300.005452 Fremont Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 01-118-21-33-0149 3,400.005324 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 3,440.00 26002 01-118-21-33-0161 100.005335 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 Page 1 of 5City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 187 of 269 Amended Special Assessment Certified Roll (Admin Fines/Citations) 2025 Administrative Penalty/Citation Printed October 08, 2025 Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year Levy No.Property ID Pending AmountProperty Address Capital Interest Charge Special Assessment Charge Total Amount Certified 26002 01-118-21-34-0092 1,600.005322 Dupont Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,640.00 26002 01-118-21-34-0104 300.005357 Colfax Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 01-118-21-34-0125 600.005316 Colfax Ave N 10.00 30.00 640.00 26002 01-118-21-34-0130 600.005327 Bryant Ave N 10.00 30.00 640.00 26002 01-118-21-42-0032 100.005614 Camden Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 01-118-21-42-0034 300.00520 56th Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 02-118-21-12-0010 1,300.005930 Earle Brown Dr 10.00 30.00 1,340.00 26002 02-118-21-14-0006 300.005712 Logan Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 02-118-21-14-0057 100.005743 Irving Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 02-118-21-14-0100 100.005744 Logan Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 02-118-21-22-0038 1,900.005931 Vincent Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,940.00 26002 02-118-21-22-0065 300.005907 Upton Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 02-118-21-34-0002 100.005301 Russell Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 02-118-21-34-0025 100.005414 Queen Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 02-118-21-34-0043 3,900.005307 Penn Ave N 10.00 30.00 3,940.00 26002 02-118-21-34-0054 600.005340 Russell Ave N 10.00 30.00 640.00 26002 02-118-21-41-0059 500.005603 James Ave N 10.00 30.00 540.00 26002 02-118-21-41-0119 200.005520 James Ave N 10.00 30.00 240.00 26002 02-118-21-42-0008 400.005549 Logan Ave N 10.00 30.00 440.00 26002 02-118-21-42-0049 100.002205 Brookview Dr 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 02-118-21-42-0074 100.002229 Brookview Dr 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 02-118-21-43-0060 300.005331 Morgan Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 02-118-21-44-0018 1,800.005433 Knox Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,840.00 26002 02-118-21-44-0134 100.005413 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 03-118-21-11-0015 100.003012 61st Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 03-118-21-11-0110 100.005948 Zenith Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 03-118-21-12-0068 600.003612 Commodore Dr 10.00 30.00 640.00 26002 03-118-21-12-0075 1,300.006101 Beard Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,340.00 26002 03-118-21-13-0008 100.005717 Brooklyn Blvd 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 03-118-21-13-0034 300.005826 Ewing Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 03-118-21-13-0100 100.005801 Brooklyn Blvd 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 03-118-21-14-0036 300.005803 Xerxes Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 03-118-21-14-0037 100.005801 Xerxes Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 03-118-21-21-0108 6,900.003906 61st Ave N 10.00 30.00 6,940.00 26002 03-118-21-23-0027 2,000.005805 Shores Dr 10.00 30.00 2,040.00 26002 03-118-21-23-0030 2,800.005811 Shores Dr 10.00 30.00 2,840.00 26002 03-118-21-23-0051 900.005835 Lake Curve La 10.00 30.00 940.00 26002 03-118-21-24-0104 750.005801 Halifax Ave N 10.00 30.00 790.00 26002 03-118-21-41-0025 100.005545 Xerxes Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 03-118-21-41-0030 100.001400 Shingle Creek Crossing 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 03-118-21-43-0084 3,300.003601 55th Ave N 10.00 30.00 3,340.00 26002 03-118-21-44-0007 1,800.005341 Brooklyn Blvd 10.00 30.00 1,840.00 26002 03-118-21-44-0022 1,800.005308 Lilac Dr N 10.00 30.00 1,840.00 26002 10-118-21-11-0022 100.005211 Xerxes Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 Page 2 of 5City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 188 of 269 Amended Special Assessment Certified Roll (Admin Fines/Citations) 2025 Administrative Penalty/Citation Printed October 08, 2025 Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year Levy No.Property ID Pending AmountProperty Address Capital Interest Charge Special Assessment Charge Total Amount Certified 26002 10-118-21-11-0023 300.005201 Xerxes Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 10-118-21-12-0027 100.005250 Ewing Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 10-118-21-12-0042 3,200.005130 Ewing Ave N 10.00 30.00 3,240.00 26002 10-118-21-13-0013 500.003321 50th Ave N 10.00 30.00 540.00 26002 10-118-21-13-0019 300.003349 49th Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 10-118-21-13-0059 8,050.003607 50th Ave N 10.00 30.00 8,090.00 26002 10-118-21-13-0069 100.004902 France Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 10-118-21-21-0077 100.003847 Oak St 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 10-118-21-32-0052 600.004200 Lakebreeze Ave 10.00 30.00 640.00 26002 10-118-21-32-0064 50.004100 Lakebreeze Ave 10.00 30.00 90.00 26002 10-118-21-32-0071 14,850.004110 Lakebreeze Ave 10.00 30.00 14,890.00 26002 10-118-21-42-0028 50.003601 47th Ave N 10.00 30.00 90.00 26002 10-118-21-42-0030 100.003501 47th Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 25-119-21-31-0066 100.001005 72nd Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 25-119-21-31-0075 750.00731 Woodbine La 10.00 30.00 790.00 26002 25-119-21-31-0090 100.00801 Woodbine La 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 25-119-21-32-0015 100.007205 Fremont Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 25-119-21-32-0045 100.007113 Fremont Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 25-119-21-32-0057 100.007208 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 25-119-21-32-0088 100.007049 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 25-119-21-33-0061 100.007025 Fremont Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 25-119-21-33-0075 50.007036 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 90.00 26002 26-119-21-41-0010 300.007121 Knox Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 26-119-21-41-0078 7,000.007201 Knox Ave N 10.00 30.00 7,040.00 26002 26-119-21-41-0094 200.001619 73rd Ave N 10.00 30.00 240.00 26002 26-119-21-42-0033 600.007142 Morgan Ave N 10.00 30.00 640.00 26002 26-119-21-43-0008 100.006906 Morgan Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 26-119-21-43-0012 200.006930 Morgan Ave N 10.00 30.00 240.00 26002 26-119-21-43-0029 100.006907 Newton Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 26-119-21-43-0034 200.006912 Oliver Ave N 10.00 30.00 240.00 26002 26-119-21-43-0049 100.006936 Morgan Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 26-119-21-44-0041 600.001713 70th Ave N 10.00 30.00 640.00 26002 26-119-21-44-0056 350.007018 Irving Ave N 10.00 30.00 390.00 26002 26-119-21-44-0070 1,000.006915 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,040.00 26002 26-119-21-44-0096 900.006912 Logan Ave N 10.00 30.00 940.00 26002 27-119-21-31-0025 100.004008 72nd Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 27-119-21-31-0037 100.007119 Grimes Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 27-119-21-32-0012 1,500.007124 Lee Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,540.00 26002 27-119-21-32-0059 3,450.004507 71st Ave N 10.00 30.00 3,490.00 26002 27-119-21-32-0124 2,900.004407 71st Ave N 10.00 30.00 2,940.00 26002 27-119-21-33-0032 100.006918 Major Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 27-119-21-33-0040 100.006927 Major Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 27-119-21-41-0011 200.003412 72nd Ave N 10.00 30.00 240.00 26002 27-119-21-43-0096 200.003606 Urban Ave 10.00 30.00 240.00 Page 3 of 5City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 189 of 269 Amended Special Assessment Certified Roll (Admin Fines/Citations) 2025 Administrative Penalty/Citation Printed October 08, 2025 Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year Levy No.Property ID Pending AmountProperty Address Capital Interest Charge Special Assessment Charge Total Amount Certified 26002 28-119-21-43-0024 100.007049 Regent Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 28-119-21-44-0043 300.007025 Quail Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 28-119-21-44-0058 700.007024 Regent Ave N 10.00 30.00 740.00 26002 33-119-21-11-0009 7,000.006836 Orchard Ave N 10.00 30.00 7,040.00 26002 33-119-21-11-0061 700.006830 Quail Ave N 10.00 30.00 740.00 26002 33-119-21-11-0102 100.006706 Regent Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 33-119-21-11-0103 1,000.006700 Regent Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,040.00 26002 33-119-21-12-0031 50.005413 68th Ave N 10.00 30.00 90.00 26002 33-119-21-12-0040 2,900.006736 Toledo Ave N 10.00 30.00 2,940.00 26002 33-119-21-12-0043 100.006718 Toledo Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 33-119-21-12-0058 100.006836 Scott Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 33-119-21-12-0066 100.006837 Scott Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 33-119-21-12-0071 100.006807 Scott Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 33-119-21-13-0029 300.005107 Winchester La 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 33-119-21-13-0075 100.006609 Unity Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 33-119-21-14-0031 100.005012 65th Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 33-119-21-14-0049 1,500.004900 Howe La 10.00 30.00 1,540.00 26002 33-119-21-41-0131 700.006300 Perry Ave N 10.00 30.00 740.00 26002 33-119-21-42-0024 2,200.006324 Scott Ave N 10.00 30.00 2,240.00 26002 33-119-21-42-0045 2,100.006401 Scott Ave N 10.00 30.00 2,140.00 26002 33-119-21-44-0021 300.006106 Quail Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 34-119-21-12-0060 100.003801 69th Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 34-119-21-12-0068 700.006800 France Ave N 10.00 30.00 740.00 26002 34-119-21-12-0077 900.006742 France Ave N 10.00 30.00 940.00 26002 34-119-21-13-0036 700.006533 Drew Ave N 10.00 30.00 740.00 26002 34-119-21-13-0075 200.003409 66th Ave N 10.00 30.00 240.00 26002 34-119-21-14-0081 1,000.003016 Quarles Rd 10.00 30.00 1,040.00 26002 34-119-21-21-0022 700.006715 Grimes Ave N 10.00 30.00 740.00 26002 34-119-21-21-0026 100.006740 Grimes Pl 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 34-119-21-32-0101 1,200.006406 Kyle Ave N 10.00 30.00 1,240.00 26002 34-119-21-33-0034 100.006242 Lee Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 34-119-21-33-0096 3,500.006106 Lee Ave N 10.00 30.00 3,540.00 26002 34-119-21-34-0084 700.004006 Joyce La 10.00 30.00 740.00 26002 34-119-21-41-0076 100.003300 Ohenry Rd 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 34-119-21-43-0037 900.006142 Brooklyn Blvd 10.00 30.00 940.00 26002 34-119-21-44-0013 400.003301 63rd Ave N 10.00 30.00 440.00 26002 34-119-21-44-0050 900.003201 Mumford Rd 10.00 30.00 940.00 26002 34-119-21-44-0109 300.003121 Lawrence Rd 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 35-119-21-11-0005 100.001505 69th Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 35-119-21-11-0017 100.006753 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 35-119-21-11-0018 300.006749 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 35-119-21-11-0019 100.006757 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 35-119-21-11-0020 100.006761 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 35-119-21-11-0021 100.006769 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 Page 4 of 5City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 190 of 269 Amended Special Assessment Certified Roll (Admin Fines/Citations) 2025 Administrative Penalty/Citation Printed October 08, 2025 Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year Levy No.Property ID Pending AmountProperty Address Capital Interest Charge Special Assessment Charge Total Amount Certified 26002 35-119-21-11-0022 100.006765 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 35-119-21-11-0023 100.006773 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 35-119-21-11-0024 100.006777 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 35-119-21-13-0012 100.002200 Freeway Blvd 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 35-119-21-23-0088 200.002701 Freeway Blvd 10.00 30.00 240.00 26002 35-119-21-24-0008 100.002550 Freeway Blvd 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 35-119-21-32-0001 300.006312 Brooklyn Dr 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 35-119-21-32-0036 6,400.006400 Xerxes Ave N 10.00 30.00 6,440.00 26002 35-119-21-32-0062 100.002801 64th Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 35-119-21-32-0068 700.002913 64th Ave N 10.00 30.00 740.00 26002 35-119-21-32-0084 300.006305 Brooklyn Dr 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 35-119-21-32-0095 200.002901 Ohenry Rd 10.00 30.00 240.00 26002 35-119-21-33-0009 100.006224 Brooklyn Dr 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 35-119-21-42-0011 1,700.006415 James Cir N 10.00 30.00 1,740.00 26002 36-119-21-12-0056 700.006721 5th St N 10.00 30.00 740.00 26002 36-119-21-13-0002 4,400.006648 West River Rd 10.00 30.00 4,440.00 26002 36-119-21-13-0097 700.006618 Camden Dr 10.00 30.00 740.00 26002 36-119-21-22-0008 50.006807 Dupont Ave N 10.00 30.00 90.00 26002 36-119-21-22-0034 100.006801 Emerson Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 36-119-21-22-0047 100.006800 Humboldt Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 36-119-21-24-0047 300.00700 66th Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 36-119-21-31-0041 3,500.001007 65th Ave N 10.00 30.00 3,540.00 26002 36-119-21-32-0036 100.006430 Girard Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 36-119-21-33-0016 200.001106 62nd Ave N 10.00 30.00 240.00 26002 36-119-21-33-0018 400.001118 62nd Ave N 10.00 30.00 440.00 26002 36-119-21-34-0028 200.006139 Colfax Ave N 10.00 30.00 240.00 26002 36-119-21-34-0039 9,000.006138 Dupont Ave N 10.00 30.00 9,040.00 26002 36-119-21-34-0097 100.00810 61st Ave N 10.00 30.00 140.00 26002 36-119-21-34-0101 300.006135 Camden Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 26002 36-119-21-43-0003 300.00516 62nd Ave N 10.00 30.00 340.00 Total:219,640.00 Page 5 of 5City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 191 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: THROUGH: BY: Angela Holm, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Public Hearings on Certification of Special Assessments for Delinquent Public Utility Service Accounts and Emergency Private Utility Service Repairs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls Requested Council Action: - Motion to Open Public Hearing on Delinquent Public Utility Service Accounts; -Take Comments; -Motion to Close Public Hearing on Delinquent Public Utility Service Accounts; and -Motion to Approve a Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Delinquent Public Service Utility Service Accounts to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls - Motion to Open Public Hearing on Emergency Private Utility Service Repairs; -Take Comments; -Motion to Close Public Hearing on Emergency Private Utility Service Repairs; and -Motion to Approve a Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Emergency Private Utility Service Repairs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls Background: Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Utility Assessment Memo - Public Hearing 2025 2. 20251007 Council Packet Cert Listing 3. Utility Repairs - Special Assessment 26008 4. Resolution - Emergency private utility repairs - 2025 Page 192 of 269 5. resolution assessments_final_fall_2025 Page 193 of 269 COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: October 13, 2025 TO: Reggie Edwards, City Manager FROM: Angela Holm, Finance Director SUBJECT: Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Delinquent Public Utility Service Accounts and Emergency Private Utility Service Repairs to the Hennepin County Property Tax Rolls Recommendation: Motion to approve a resolution certifying special assessments for delinquent public utility service accounts to the Hennepin County property tax rolls. Motion to approve a resolution certifying special assessments for emergency private utility service repairs to the Hennepin County property tax rolls. Background: The City of Brooklyn Center certifies delinquent utility bills to Hennepin County annually. The certified bills become assessments on the property owner’s property tax bill for the following year. This process starts with a letter to the customer notifying them that their account is past due and that the amount will be certified against their property taxes. This letter details the process and the legal authority for certification. Recipients of this letter are advised they may dispute the charges at a public hearing. The date, time and location for the public hearing was published in the official newspaper of the City. Customers that have not paid by the cut-off date in the letter (November 21, 2025) are included in the final assessment roll submitted to the County. The City has approximately 8,900 public utility service accounts. Comparative number of accounts and dollars certified are as follows: 2019 661 $487,227.89 2020 489 $377,574.76 2021 663 $513,875.17 2022 968 $877,967.32 2023 622 $582,021.22 2024 886 $905,656.82 2025 878 $862,410.48 City staff have not received any written requests for Council review of their certification. Page 194 of 269 COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM The City has a policy that provides assistance to residents who are facing the unexpected financial burden of a needed exterior private utility repair. These repairs often involve the sewer line from a residential property to the main street line. This portion of the sewer system is the responsibility of the property owner. For taxes payable in 2026, there are five assessments that will be included on the final roll sent to Hennepin County. A listing of these items is included with this agenda item. Budget Issues: The assessed values are recorded as receivables and recognized as revenues in the current budget year. However, the actual collections of these accounts will likely occur in future years. Strategic Priorities: • Maintain a strong financial position Page 195 of 269 Le v y # Ac c o u n t Nu m b e r Se r v i c e A d d r e s s Ce r t i f i c a t i o n Ba l a n c e Pr o p e r t y I D # 26 0 0 7 00 2 6 9 9 0 0 0 6 42 0 1 J A N E T L A $1 4 , 5 8 9 . 3 4 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 0 8 5 7 0 0 0 5 59 5 1 E A R L E B R O W N D R $8 , 3 0 0 . 9 7 02 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 3 26 0 0 7 00 9 9 9 9 0 2 0 6 12 0 0 S H I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G $8 , 2 8 7 . 4 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 1 8 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 17 0 0 F R E E W A Y B L V D $7 , 0 1 8 . 0 4 35 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 2 2 0 0 0 6 68 1 3 H U M B O L D T A V E N $6 , 6 1 3 . 4 8 35 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 6 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 2 1 0 0 0 7 68 1 9 H U M B O L D T A V E N $6 , 2 9 1 . 9 4 35 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 4 5 4 0 0 0 4 16 0 1 W O O D B I N E L A $6 , 0 8 2 . 3 0 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 6 3 26 0 0 7 00 7 1 0 8 0 0 0 3 53 0 1 R U S S E L L A V E N $6 , 0 0 3 . 3 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 0 0 2 26 0 0 7 00 8 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 58 3 0 L O G A N A V E N $5 , 9 1 4 . 6 8 02 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 0 2 5 26 0 0 7 00 4 7 6 1 3 0 0 4 14 0 0 S H I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G $5 , 1 5 8 . 9 2 03 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 0 3 0 26 0 0 7 00 1 9 1 6 0 0 0 5 49 0 0 H O W E L A $4 , 5 2 4 . 6 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 4 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 4 0 0 0 0 2 28 0 0 F R E E W A Y B L V D $4 , 3 9 4 . 6 1 35 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 0 5 2 26 0 0 7 00 3 1 8 9 0 0 0 1 62 1 5 B R O O K L Y N B L V D $4 , 2 2 0 . 2 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 6 26 0 0 7 00 0 8 7 6 0 0 0 2 59 1 0 S H I N G L E C R E E K P K W Y $3 , 1 8 5 . 4 9 02 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 26 0 0 7 00 4 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 57 0 1 B R O O K L Y N B L V D $3 , 1 3 9 . 1 5 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 5 7 26 0 0 7 00 3 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 66 0 7 E W I N G A V E N $3 , 0 6 8 . 3 2 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 9 3 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 6 5 0 0 0 0 64 2 4 O R C H A R D A V E N $3 , 0 0 2 . 1 0 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 8 5 3 4 0 0 0 5 54 0 0 H U M B O L D T A V E N $2 , 8 4 1 . 6 4 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 0 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 7 8 0 0 0 5 63 3 7 N O B L E A V E N $2 , 8 3 8 . 1 2 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 1 0 26 0 0 7 00 5 9 3 5 0 0 0 4 66 4 2 D U P O N T A V E N $2 , 6 5 3 . 4 5 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 4 0 0 4 5 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 7 5 0 0 0 4 41 1 0 L A K E B R E E Z E A V E $2 , 6 1 2 . 8 6 10 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 7 1 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 8 8 0 4 72 7 2 U N I T Y A V E N $2 , 5 2 3 . 4 4 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 9 6 0 0 0 0 8 44 1 3 6 6 T H A V E N $2 , 3 7 8 . 3 7 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 3 0 0 4 1 26 0 0 7 00 4 8 1 6 0 0 0 5 40 0 7 5 8 T H A V E N $2 , 2 4 3 . 3 8 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 3 6 0 0 0 4 70 2 5 E W I N G A V E N $2 , 1 5 6 . 8 4 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 4 1 26 0 0 7 00 3 2 8 3 0 0 0 1 30 1 3 6 5 T H A V E N $2 , 0 7 0 . 3 0 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 1 0 8 26 0 0 7 00 4 1 5 2 0 0 0 7 60 0 7 P E A R S O N D R $2 , 0 6 5 . 1 2 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 3 3 26 0 0 7 00 7 7 4 3 0 0 0 4 55 4 2 L I L A C D R N $2 , 0 5 6 . 0 4 02 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 3 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 P O E R D $2 , 0 4 3 . 2 0 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 6 0 26 0 0 7 00 0 8 4 5 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 S H I N G L E C R E E K P K W Y $2 , 0 3 3 . 9 0 35 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 8 26 0 0 7 00 7 9 5 4 0 0 0 8 56 4 2 E M E R S O N A V E N $1 , 9 2 7 . 1 7 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 1 7 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 5 69 1 9 O L I V E R A V E N $1 , 9 0 2 . 3 3 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 3 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 4 5 4 0 0 0 7 71 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D $1 , 8 2 1 . 8 6 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 9 7 26 0 0 7 00 1 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 62 1 3 U N I T Y A V E N $1 , 8 0 0 . 7 4 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 9 2 Pa g e 1 9 6 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 3 8 8 4 0 0 0 4 59 3 1 V I N C E N T A V E N $1 , 7 9 6 . 4 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 3 8 26 0 0 7 00 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 9 63 0 0 S H I N G L E C R E E K P K W Y $1 , 7 8 9 . 3 7 35 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 7 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 2 1 0 3 0 6 71 1 0 Q U A I L C I R E $1 , 7 4 3 . 9 1 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 1 9 1 26 0 0 7 00 6 5 0 4 0 0 0 5 50 1 9 E W I N G A V E N $1 , 7 3 9 . 5 0 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 4 0 26 0 0 7 00 3 8 6 0 0 0 0 2 59 0 7 U P T O N A V E N $1 , 7 1 7 . 4 3 02 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 6 5 26 0 0 7 00 7 9 5 2 0 0 0 0 11 0 7 5 7 T H A V E N $1 , 7 1 7 . 1 7 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 1 8 26 0 0 7 00 2 8 0 4 0 0 0 8 42 1 3 6 3 R D A V E N $1 , 7 1 4 . 7 5 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 1 1 3 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 2 6 0 0 0 2 69 0 1 M O R G A N A V E N $1 , 7 1 2 . 7 2 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 1 8 26 0 0 7 00 4 4 7 5 0 0 0 7 39 0 0 5 7 T H A V E N $1 , 6 8 0 . 9 7 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 5 3 26 0 0 7 00 3 5 2 7 0 1 0 6 60 3 0 V I N C E N T A V E N $1 , 6 7 4 . 1 1 02 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 4 26 0 0 7 00 6 3 9 5 0 2 0 5 37 1 5 5 0 T H A V E N $1 , 6 3 7 . 1 9 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 8 0 26 0 0 7 00 5 0 2 6 0 0 0 4 71 2 4 W E S T R I V E R R D $1 , 5 4 3 . 3 9 25 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 1 9 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 3 8 0 0 0 3 53 3 6 C O L F A X A V E N $1 , 5 3 4 . 0 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 0 7 4 26 0 0 7 00 3 4 7 3 0 0 0 1 26 1 3 6 5 T H A V E N $1 , 5 0 9 . 1 0 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 7 4 3 4 0 0 0 8 53 0 9 H U M B O L D T A V E N $1 , 5 0 1 . 7 5 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 0 3 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 49 1 2 6 5 T H A V E N $1 , 4 9 6 . 2 0 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 3 5 26 0 0 7 00 3 3 8 4 0 0 0 9 32 0 6 6 3 R D A V E N $1 , 4 8 8 . 8 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 1 0 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 6 4 0 0 0 7 42 0 0 L A K E B R E E Z E A V E $1 , 4 8 1 . 7 6 10 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 5 2 26 0 0 7 00 4 3 2 8 0 0 0 6 60 4 3 H A L I F A X A V E N $1 , 4 7 7 . 5 7 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 8 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 5 5 0 0 0 4 64 0 7 P E R R Y A V E N $1 , 4 6 1 . 1 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 7 1 26 0 0 7 00 2 4 2 5 0 0 0 7 62 1 3 L E E A V E N $1 , 4 5 4 . 4 7 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 5 0 26 0 0 7 00 2 1 9 6 0 0 0 4 64 1 2 U N I T Y A V E N $1 , 4 5 3 . 1 4 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 8 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 6 8 5 0 0 0 2 61 4 2 F R A N C E A V E N $1 , 4 3 4 . 0 8 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 5 8 26 0 0 7 00 5 9 6 5 0 0 0 7 68 0 7 D U P O N T A V E N $1 , 4 2 9 . 7 0 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 8 26 0 0 7 00 6 6 1 3 0 0 0 3 39 3 1 5 1 S T A V E N $1 , 4 1 7 . 1 9 10 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 2 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 0 5 0 4 72 4 8 U N I T Y A V E N $1 , 4 0 7 . 0 9 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 5 4 4 0 0 0 3 62 0 0 L E E A V E N $1 , 3 9 8 . 9 9 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 4 1 26 0 0 7 00 8 2 9 0 0 1 0 8 71 1 B E L L V U E L A $1 , 3 9 6 . 6 0 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 1 3 9 26 0 0 7 00 3 5 8 3 0 0 0 8 33 0 1 6 2 N D A V E N $1 , 3 9 4 . 0 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 8 4 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 8 6 0 1 0 0 40 4 0 L A K E S I D E A V E $1 , 3 9 0 . 8 8 10 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 1 26 0 0 7 00 6 3 9 9 0 0 0 3 36 0 7 5 0 T H A V E N $1 , 3 8 7 . 9 7 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 5 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 4 2 0 1 0 9 27 8 1 F R E E W A Y B L V D $1 , 3 7 8 . 6 6 35 1 1 9 2 1 2 3 0 0 8 6 26 0 0 7 00 8 4 1 3 0 0 0 1 53 0 8 E M E R S O N A V E N $1 , 3 7 4 . 5 4 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 1 4 8 26 0 0 7 00 6 9 7 4 0 0 0 6 33 2 1 5 0 T H A V E N $1 , 3 7 0 . 4 9 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 1 3 26 0 0 7 00 3 2 9 8 0 0 0 4 64 0 6 B E A R D A V E N $1 , 3 6 1 . 4 5 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 1 2 3 26 0 0 7 00 8 9 0 4 0 0 0 2 59 5 1 E M E R S O N A V E N $1 , 3 6 1 . 1 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 1 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 8 9 0 0 0 5 70 1 8 G I R A R D A V E N $1 , 3 5 8 . 5 7 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 6 9 Pa g e 1 9 7 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 3 2 9 2 0 0 0 0 32 0 7 6 5 T H A V E N $1 , 3 5 7 . 9 9 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 1 1 7 26 0 0 7 00 3 3 6 5 0 0 0 2 33 1 3 P O E R D $1 , 3 4 8 . 9 3 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 6 2 0 0 0 2 53 5 7 C O L F A X A V E N $1 , 3 2 4 . 9 7 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 1 0 4 26 0 0 7 00 7 2 5 0 0 0 0 9 53 2 4 N E W T O N A V E N $1 , 3 0 2 . 7 0 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 1 1 26 0 0 7 00 9 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 62 0 0 D U P O N T A V E N $1 , 3 0 1 . 3 8 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 7 0 26 0 0 7 00 1 2 7 2 0 0 0 4 16 1 9 I R V I N G L A N $1 , 3 0 0 . 6 6 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 7 2 26 0 0 7 00 3 6 3 7 0 0 0 4 32 0 6 M U M F O R D R D $1 , 3 0 0 . 0 5 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 2 5 26 0 0 7 00 2 8 6 3 0 0 0 6 64 0 6 I N D I A N A A V E N $1 , 2 9 7 . 3 4 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 7 4 26 0 0 7 00 6 9 0 5 0 0 0 0 49 3 7 B E A R D A V E N $1 , 2 9 4 . 6 4 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 2 7 26 0 0 7 00 7 2 6 3 0 0 0 4 54 1 3 M O R G A N A V E N $1 , 2 7 9 . 9 3 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 9 0 26 0 0 7 00 2 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 72 2 4 D U P O N T A V E N $1 , 2 7 8 . 9 8 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 5 9 26 0 0 7 00 4 0 2 6 0 0 0 1 58 3 5 A B B O T T A V E N $1 , 2 7 5 . 9 9 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 0 1 5 26 0 0 7 00 3 4 3 9 0 0 0 4 26 0 7 6 4 T H A V E N $1 , 2 7 2 . 1 8 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 5 6 26 0 0 7 00 6 3 9 5 0 1 0 6 37 2 1 5 0 T H A V E N $1 , 2 6 8 . 3 4 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 8 0 26 0 0 7 00 3 7 3 9 0 0 0 1 28 1 9 6 3 R D A V E N $1 , 2 6 5 . 0 4 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 2 2 26 0 0 7 00 4 9 2 7 0 2 0 9 58 1 1 S H O R E S D R $1 , 2 5 5 . 8 2 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 3 0 26 0 0 7 00 3 2 2 2 0 0 0 5 31 1 9 6 6 T H A V E N $1 , 2 5 0 . 4 2 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 5 9 26 0 0 7 00 3 5 5 5 0 0 0 2 33 0 1 L A W R E N C E R D $1 , 2 4 6 . 9 9 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 1 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 4 6 7 5 0 0 0 5 53 1 9 N O R T H P O R T D R $1 , 2 4 5 . 9 9 03 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 4 7 26 0 0 7 00 7 5 7 7 0 0 0 5 55 3 3 L O G A N A V E N $1 , 2 4 3 . 7 4 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 1 0 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 9 7 1 1 0 3 68 0 1 A L D R I C H A V E N $1 , 2 4 1 . 9 4 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 1 0 1 0 7 26 0 0 7 00 3 0 7 2 0 1 0 0 66 1 2 D R E W A V E N $1 , 2 4 1 . 8 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 9 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 8 3 5 0 0 0 3 62 3 7 P E R R Y A V E N $1 , 2 4 0 . 8 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 3 7 26 0 0 7 00 1 8 7 4 0 0 0 5 64 0 1 U N I T Y A V E N $1 , 2 3 8 . 9 9 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 9 7 26 0 0 7 00 6 8 3 6 0 0 0 4 50 2 4 L I L A C D R N $1 , 2 3 7 . 7 7 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 2 8 26 0 0 7 00 7 4 2 1 0 0 0 3 54 0 0 I R V I N G A V E N $1 , 2 2 2 . 2 7 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 0 8 6 26 0 0 7 00 4 0 2 2 0 0 0 5 59 0 6 A B B O T T A V E N $1 , 2 2 0 . 1 0 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 1 0 0 8 5 26 0 0 7 00 9 9 9 9 0 5 5 6 60 1 6 9 T H A V E N $1 , 2 1 2 . 7 9 36 1 1 9 2 1 1 2 0 0 8 2 26 0 0 7 00 8 0 4 8 0 0 0 4 56 4 6 B R Y A N T A V E N $1 , 2 1 2 . 0 9 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 9 8 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 9 51 0 6 7 0 T H A V E N $1 , 2 1 0 . 6 1 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 3 2 26 0 0 7 00 2 8 3 8 0 0 0 8 63 0 0 I N D I A N A A V E N $1 , 2 0 6 . 1 2 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 8 7 0 0 3 71 0 4 U N I T Y A V E N $1 , 2 0 3 . 1 4 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 1 3 2 26 0 0 7 00 2 5 6 9 0 0 0 3 64 3 7 K Y L E A V E N $1 , 2 0 2 . 3 4 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 1 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 4 5 4 7 0 0 0 1 39 0 1 E C K B E R G D R $1 , 2 0 1 . 7 7 03 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 7 8 26 0 0 7 00 3 3 1 2 0 0 0 6 31 0 0 6 4 T H A V E N $1 , 2 0 0 . 1 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 2 0 26 0 0 7 00 2 6 2 5 0 0 0 5 64 0 6 K Y L E A V E N $1 , 1 9 5 . 5 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 1 0 1 26 0 0 7 00 7 7 9 3 0 0 0 3 55 3 8 G I R A R D A V E N $1 , 1 9 2 . 5 5 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 3 5 Pa g e 1 9 8 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 6 4 8 2 0 0 0 1 52 4 3 E W I N G A V E N $1 , 1 9 1 . 8 9 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 2 26 0 0 7 00 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 6 31 1 3 6 6 T H A V E N $1 , 1 9 0 . 6 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 5 8 26 0 0 7 00 3 1 6 8 0 0 0 6 63 1 9 F R A N C E A V E N $1 , 1 8 7 . 8 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 1 8 26 0 0 7 00 1 7 7 6 0 0 0 4 61 4 3 R E G E N T A V E N $1 , 1 8 6 . 8 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 5 7 9 9 0 0 0 9 81 1 6 9 T H A V E N $1 , 1 8 5 . 2 4 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 4 3 6 0 0 0 4 61 0 0 L E E A V E N $1 , 1 7 4 . 5 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 9 5 26 0 0 7 00 1 7 8 9 0 0 0 9 62 1 8 R E G E N T A V E N $1 , 1 7 3 . 3 2 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 5 3 26 0 0 7 00 2 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 45 3 0 K A T H R E N E D R $1 , 1 7 1 . 3 4 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 4 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 9 9 5 0 0 0 9 52 0 6 W I N C H E S T E R L A $1 , 1 6 9 . 2 4 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 2 2 26 0 0 7 00 6 8 9 4 0 0 0 3 50 1 8 A B B O T T A V E N $1 , 1 6 8 . 8 1 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 0 8 5 26 0 0 7 00 3 2 4 5 0 0 0 8 30 0 8 Q U A R L E S R D $1 , 1 6 8 . 1 4 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 8 2 26 0 0 7 00 7 5 0 8 0 0 0 9 55 0 0 J A M E S A V E N $1 , 1 6 7 . 8 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 1 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 8 9 0 0 0 7 72 1 9 N E W T O N A V E N $1 , 1 6 4 . 6 2 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 7 3 26 0 0 7 00 6 4 8 6 0 0 0 7 52 2 5 E W I N G A V E N $1 , 1 6 0 . 9 4 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 5 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 7 4 5 0 0 0 0 40 1 2 6 2 N D A V E N $1 , 1 5 9 . 3 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 4 9 26 0 0 7 00 8 0 6 2 0 0 0 5 80 6 5 5 T H A V E N $1 , 1 5 8 . 3 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 1 5 0 26 0 0 7 00 7 9 2 1 0 0 0 8 56 2 0 F R E M O N T A V E N $1 , 1 5 7 . 4 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 1 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 7 9 1 2 0 0 0 9 56 4 9 F R E M O N T A V E N $1 , 1 5 6 . 7 4 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 7 2 26 0 0 7 00 7 6 0 7 0 0 0 9 21 1 2 B R O O K V I E W D R $1 , 1 5 5 . 9 7 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 4 2 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 4 2 0 0 0 9 12 0 1 7 3 R D A V E N $1 , 1 4 9 . 4 2 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 2 26 0 0 7 00 4 6 2 0 0 0 0 1 36 1 3 5 4 T H A V E N $1 , 1 4 9 . 4 2 03 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 2 9 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 9 7 0 0 0 6 67 3 7 A L D R I C H A V E N $1 , 1 4 9 . 4 2 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 1 0 0 8 9 26 0 0 7 00 7 6 7 7 0 0 0 4 55 0 7 J U D Y L A $1 , 1 4 9 . 0 3 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 8 5 26 0 0 7 00 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 6 51 5 0 D R E W A V E N $1 , 1 4 8 . 1 9 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 4 8 26 0 0 7 00 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 6 62 1 8 M A J O R A V E N $1 , 1 4 6 . 0 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 6 0 26 0 0 7 00 8 2 6 6 0 0 0 9 54 4 4 C A M D E N A V E N $1 , 1 4 3 . 3 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 4 7 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 9 18 0 1 7 0 T H A V E N $1 , 1 4 2 . 2 1 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 2 4 26 0 0 7 00 4 3 2 9 0 0 0 5 60 4 7 H A L I F A X A V E N $1 , 1 4 1 . 5 4 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 8 3 26 0 0 7 00 7 5 1 7 0 0 0 8 56 0 3 J A M E S A V E N $1 , 1 4 1 . 2 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 0 5 9 26 0 0 7 00 5 1 1 3 0 0 0 8 71 2 5 W I L L O W L A N $1 , 1 4 1 . 2 4 25 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 1 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 1 8 8 0 0 0 4 53 1 8 E L E A N O R L A $1 , 1 3 9 . 3 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 7 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 9 3 7 0 0 0 0 51 2 5 H O W E L A $1 , 1 3 8 . 4 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 8 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 9 8 7 0 0 0 9 65 2 4 U N I T Y A V E N $1 , 1 3 8 . 4 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 3 0 7 6 0 0 0 7 65 3 2 D R E W A V E N $1 , 1 3 8 . 4 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 5 7 26 0 0 7 00 1 5 3 4 0 0 0 1 72 3 0 L E E A V E N $1 , 1 3 7 . 0 2 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 5 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 63 0 0 P E R R Y A V E N $1 , 1 3 4 . 6 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 1 3 1 26 0 0 7 00 2 7 0 4 0 0 0 9 42 1 2 J A N E T L A $1 , 1 3 2 . 7 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 0 2 Pa g e 1 9 9 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 8 4 0 5 0 0 0 1 53 2 3 D U P O N T A V E N $1 , 1 3 2 . 7 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 1 4 1 26 0 0 7 00 6 7 1 5 0 0 0 0 38 4 7 O A K S T $1 , 1 2 9 . 8 6 10 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 7 7 26 0 0 7 00 3 1 6 0 0 0 0 4 63 0 9 G R I M E S A V E N $1 , 1 2 8 . 5 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 2 8 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 7 9 2 0 0 4 16 1 2 6 8 T H L N N $1 , 1 2 7 . 0 1 35 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 4 1 26 0 0 7 00 3 8 9 3 0 0 0 3 59 4 2 W A S H B U R N A V E N $1 , 1 2 5 . 3 9 02 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 5 1 26 0 0 7 00 4 3 0 5 0 0 0 3 60 0 1 H A L I F A X P L $1 , 1 2 2 . 2 6 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 5 7 26 0 0 7 00 7 9 8 0 0 0 0 6 56 2 5 D U P O N T A V E N $1 , 1 1 9 . 4 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 8 0 6 0 0 0 8 62 1 9 Q U A I L A V E N $1 , 1 1 7 . 5 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 2 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 9 0 2 0 0 0 9 65 3 6 O R C H A R D A V E N $1 , 1 1 5 . 4 5 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 0 3 26 0 0 7 00 3 6 2 9 0 0 0 4 33 1 9 M U M F O R D R D $1 , 1 1 4 . 4 3 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 5 7 26 0 0 7 00 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 7 39 1 9 6 1 S T A V E N $1 , 1 1 3 . 0 7 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 1 2 7 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 2 5 0 0 0 3 67 5 7 H U M B O L D T A V E N $1 , 1 1 1 . 8 4 35 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 9 26 0 0 7 00 6 7 4 5 0 0 0 4 51 2 7 F R A N C E A V E N $1 , 1 0 4 . 2 1 10 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 5 0 26 0 0 7 00 8 2 3 1 0 0 0 1 54 2 7 4 T H S T N $1 , 1 0 3 . 0 7 01 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 5 7 26 0 0 7 00 7 4 5 2 0 0 0 5 55 0 1 H U M B O L D T A V E N $1 , 1 0 0 . 2 9 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 26 0 0 7 00 3 7 0 6 0 0 0 0 33 0 1 6 3 R D A V E N $1 , 0 9 9 . 4 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 1 3 26 0 0 7 00 4 4 4 7 0 0 0 2 57 1 9 D R E W A V E N $1 , 0 9 7 . 8 5 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 6 8 26 0 0 7 00 0 8 5 6 0 0 0 3 32 1 2 6 7 T H A V E N $1 , 0 9 7 . 3 9 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 8 4 1 0 9 53 3 1 7 0 T H C I R $1 , 0 9 6 . 5 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 8 9 26 0 0 7 00 9 0 4 3 0 0 0 2 62 3 3 C O L F A X A V E N $1 , 0 9 6 . 4 7 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 1 8 1 6 0 4 13 2 8 6 8 T H L N N $1 , 0 9 4 . 7 1 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 0 9 0 26 0 0 7 00 2 1 2 4 0 0 0 1 64 0 1 R E G E N T A V E N $1 , 0 9 4 . 7 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 3 1 26 0 0 7 00 6 6 0 1 0 0 0 7 38 0 6 5 1 S T A V E N $1 , 0 9 3 . 8 6 10 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 0 7 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 2 5 0 0 54 0 9 P O N D S D R $1 , 0 9 2 . 9 5 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 6 8 9 5 0 0 0 2 50 2 4 A B B O T T A V E N $1 , 0 8 9 . 9 6 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 0 8 6 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 8 8 0 0 0 2 54 3 8 D U P O N T A V E N $1 , 0 8 9 . 3 4 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 1 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 4 2 0 9 0 0 0 0 38 0 1 6 1 S T A V E N $1 , 0 8 7 . 9 5 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 7 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 50 1 2 6 5 T H A V E N $1 , 0 8 7 . 1 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 3 1 26 0 0 7 00 2 5 9 9 0 0 0 7 61 0 1 K Y L E A V E N $1 , 0 8 7 . 1 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 9 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 4 1 0 0 0 4 72 2 4 H A L I F A X A V E N $1 , 0 8 6 . 0 9 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 2 9 26 0 0 7 00 4 4 2 0 0 0 0 3 35 0 1 A D M I R A L L A $1 , 0 8 3 . 3 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 5 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 2 7 0 2 0 7 68 1 3 Y O R K P L $1 , 0 8 0 . 8 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 2 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 6 2 0 0 0 3 64 0 6 O R C H A R D A V E N $1 , 0 8 0 . 4 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 1 8 26 0 0 7 00 4 1 0 7 0 0 0 3 60 1 9 B R O O K L Y N B L V D $1 , 0 7 8 . 5 6 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 7 26 0 0 7 00 4 4 0 8 0 0 0 9 37 0 7 5 8 T H A V E N $1 , 0 7 7 . 6 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 5 9 26 0 0 7 00 7 6 2 0 0 0 0 2 55 4 8 M O R G A N A V E N $1 , 0 7 7 . 5 7 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 8 2 3 3 0 0 0 9 54 0 7 4 T H S T N $1 , 0 7 6 . 6 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 5 9 Pa g e 2 0 0 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 9 1 0 4 0 0 0 8 60 1 8 C O L F A X A V E N $1 , 0 7 4 . 6 2 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 9 6 26 0 0 7 00 8 5 3 8 0 0 0 1 54 4 0 H U M B O L D T A V E N $1 , 0 7 2 . 8 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 0 6 8 26 0 0 7 00 9 9 9 9 0 7 0 6 70 4 6 8 T H L N N $1 , 0 7 2 . 8 6 36 - 1 1 9 - 2 1 - 2 1 - 0 1 3 0 26 0 0 7 00 2 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 61 2 6 J U N E A V E N $1 , 0 7 1 . 9 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 0 1 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 3 52 0 6 6 3 R D A V E N $1 , 0 7 1 . 9 0 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 1 2 4 26 0 0 7 00 8 7 7 9 0 0 0 4 60 0 7 G I R A R D A V E N $1 , 0 7 0 . 9 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 8 3 26 0 0 7 00 8 4 4 5 0 0 0 3 53 3 5 E M E R S O N A V E N $1 , 0 6 8 . 1 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 1 6 1 26 0 0 7 00 2 3 3 7 0 0 0 5 72 0 6 9 T H A V E N $1 , 0 6 8 . 1 1 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 0 9 8 4 0 0 0 8 38 0 1 U R B A N A V E $1 , 0 6 6 . 7 0 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 6 5 26 0 0 7 00 4 2 8 3 0 0 0 9 59 1 8 A D M I R A L L A $1 , 0 6 6 . 2 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 9 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 9 5 0 0 0 4 64 3 1 M A J O R A V E N $1 , 0 6 6 . 2 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 1 9 26 0 0 7 00 3 3 3 8 0 0 0 6 32 1 6 P O E R D $1 , 0 6 2 . 6 9 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 5 6 26 0 0 7 00 2 8 9 3 0 0 0 0 65 0 1 N O B L E A V E N $1 , 0 6 2 . 4 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 0 8 26 0 0 7 00 8 6 4 9 0 0 0 2 58 0 7 K N O X A V E N $1 , 0 6 2 . 2 8 02 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 0 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 5 8 2 3 0 0 0 9 66 2 6 B R Y A N T A V E N $1 , 0 6 1 . 4 6 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 4 0 0 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 7 7 0 0 0 5 53 2 2 D U P O N T A V E N $1 , 0 6 1 . 3 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 0 9 2 26 0 0 7 00 3 4 7 1 0 0 0 3 26 0 1 6 5 T H A V E N $1 , 0 6 0 . 5 1 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 1 5 26 0 0 7 00 2 9 1 7 0 0 0 2 44 0 1 W I N C H E S T E R L A $1 , 0 5 9 . 5 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 3 0 0 5 5 26 0 0 7 00 2 9 7 0 0 0 0 6 42 0 7 6 6 T H A V E N $1 , 0 5 8 . 6 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 4 0 0 3 3 26 0 0 7 00 6 5 2 1 0 0 0 4 51 3 0 F R A N C E A V E N $1 , 0 5 6 . 8 1 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 8 3 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 6 9 0 0 0 8 50 0 6 6 3 R D A V E N $1 , 0 5 6 . 1 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 8 5 26 0 0 7 00 9 9 1 6 0 0 0 6 64 3 0 G I R A R D A V E N $1 , 0 5 5 . 8 5 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 3 6 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 5 3 0 0 0 4 48 0 6 6 3 R D A V E N $1 , 0 5 5 . 7 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 4 7 26 0 0 7 00 4 0 3 2 0 0 0 3 59 2 5 A B B O T T A V E N $1 , 0 5 4 . 8 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 1 0 0 6 2 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 8 2 0 4 0 9 67 0 8 I R V I N G P L N $1 , 0 5 4 . 8 1 35 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 5 7 26 0 0 7 00 3 3 0 3 0 0 0 7 32 2 4 6 4 T H A V E N $1 , 0 5 3 . 8 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 2 9 26 0 0 7 00 7 3 9 2 0 0 0 8 53 2 0 J A M E S A V E N $1 , 0 5 3 . 8 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 0 5 2 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 6 9 0 0 0 8 70 0 0 K N O X A V E N $1 , 0 5 2 . 9 1 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 2 69 1 8 G R I M E S A V E N $1 , 0 5 1 . 9 6 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 5 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 69 3 1 W I L L O W L A N $1 , 0 5 1 . 0 1 25 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 2 5 26 0 0 7 00 2 1 2 5 0 0 0 0 63 3 3 R E G E N T A V E N $1 , 0 4 9 . 1 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 3 0 26 0 0 7 00 1 8 2 3 0 0 0 7 61 0 0 Q U A I L A V E N $1 , 0 4 8 . 6 0 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 2 2 26 0 0 7 00 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 5 62 2 4 M A J O R A V E N $1 , 0 4 7 . 2 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 5 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 5 4 9 0 0 0 8 62 3 0 L E E A V E N $1 , 0 4 5 . 7 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 3 6 26 0 0 7 00 3 4 2 6 0 0 0 9 28 1 8 O H E N R Y R D $1 , 0 4 4 . 3 6 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 7 4 26 0 0 7 00 7 7 6 1 0 0 0 1 55 2 8 H U M B O L D T A V E N $1 , 0 4 4 . 1 7 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 6 3 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 7 7 0 0 0 6 63 4 3 N O B L E A V E N $1 , 0 4 1 . 5 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 9 Pa g e 2 0 1 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 7 2 0 0 0 0 53 0 1 C O L F A X A V E N $1 , 0 3 7 . 7 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 0 8 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 3 8 0 0 0 6 50 0 6 6 5 T H A V E N $1 , 0 3 6 . 5 3 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 3 2 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 6 4 0 0 0 1 64 1 8 O R C H A R D A V E N $1 , 0 3 6 . 1 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 2 0 26 0 0 7 00 2 9 3 0 0 0 0 5 65 3 0 I N D I A N A A V E N $1 , 0 3 5 . 8 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 4 0 0 2 3 26 0 0 7 00 8 4 7 6 0 0 0 5 54 2 1 F R E M O N T A V E N $1 , 0 3 1 . 8 5 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 1 6 5 26 0 0 7 00 8 6 8 1 0 0 0 1 57 2 7 J A M E S A V E N $1 , 0 3 1 . 4 7 02 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 0 3 5 26 0 0 7 00 0 5 9 5 0 0 0 9 70 4 9 R E G E N T A V E N $1 , 0 3 0 . 5 0 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 2 4 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 1 8 2 3 0 5 13 0 0 6 8 T H L N N $1 , 0 2 9 . 0 7 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 0 5 5 26 0 0 7 00 9 1 4 8 0 0 0 6 59 3 3 B R Y A N T A V E N $1 , 0 2 7 . 8 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 1 0 7 26 0 0 7 00 7 7 3 1 0 0 0 8 23 0 6 B R O O K V I E W D R $1 , 0 2 7 . 5 8 02 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 0 5 26 0 0 7 00 2 9 0 2 0 2 0 7 65 2 5 N O B L E A V E N $1 , 0 2 6 . 3 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 0 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 9 5 3 0 0 0 7 46 0 7 6 6 T H A V E N $1 , 0 2 6 . 0 5 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 3 0 0 2 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 5 8 4 0 0 0 4 44 0 1 6 3 R D A V E N $1 , 0 2 5 . 6 4 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 2 3 26 0 0 7 00 1 5 2 6 0 0 0 1 71 1 8 L E E A V E N $1 , 0 2 5 . 5 7 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 1 3 26 0 0 7 00 4 7 7 2 0 0 0 7 56 1 5 H A L I F A X A V E N $1 , 0 2 4 . 4 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 8 6 26 0 0 7 00 7 6 7 5 0 0 0 6 23 0 6 E R I C O N D R $1 , 0 2 2 . 5 1 02 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 3 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 9 2 8 0 0 0 1 49 1 3 H O W E L A $1 , 0 2 2 . 5 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 5 8 26 0 0 7 00 2 1 1 4 0 2 0 1 64 2 4 R E G E N T A V E N $1 , 0 2 2 . 5 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 1 0 8 26 0 0 7 00 7 2 1 1 0 0 0 7 21 1 8 5 5 T H A V E N $1 , 0 2 1 . 5 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 7 1 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 0 5 0 0 0 9 69 0 7 M A J O R A V E N $1 , 0 2 1 . 1 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 4 3 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 7 9 0 0 0 8 70 1 2 M O R G A N A V E N $1 , 0 2 0 . 6 1 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 5 3 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 5 7 0 0 0 4 72 4 3 M O R G A N A V E N $1 , 0 2 0 . 6 1 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 5 3 26 0 0 7 00 1 4 3 9 0 0 0 4 17 1 1 7 3 R D A V E N $1 , 0 1 9 . 6 6 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 1 0 7 26 0 0 7 00 7 4 4 4 0 0 0 6 54 1 3 H U M B O L D T A V E N $1 , 0 1 8 . 7 1 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 1 3 4 26 0 0 7 00 3 4 4 7 0 0 0 4 28 1 3 6 4 T H A V E N $1 , 0 1 7 . 7 6 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 6 6 0 6 0 0 0 2 39 0 0 5 1 S T A V E N $1 , 0 1 7 . 7 6 10 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 1 2 26 0 0 7 00 4 0 5 1 0 0 0 9 59 2 4 B E A R D A V E N $1 , 0 1 7 . 6 5 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 1 0 0 7 1 26 0 0 7 00 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 1 41 1 3 6 3 R D A V E N $1 , 0 1 6 . 8 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 1 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 9 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 59 1 4 C O L F A X A V E N $1 , 0 1 6 . 7 0 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 2 26 0 0 7 00 2 1 9 3 0 0 0 8 70 4 8 E M E R S O N A V E N $1 , 0 1 3 . 9 6 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 9 3 26 0 0 7 00 2 7 2 3 0 0 0 6 39 0 1 6 2 N D A V E N $1 , 0 1 2 . 0 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 7 1 26 0 0 7 00 4 2 8 5 0 0 0 7 58 0 1 H A L I F A X A V E N $1 , 0 1 2 . 0 6 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 1 0 4 26 0 0 7 00 3 8 6 1 0 0 0 1 59 0 1 U P T O N A V E N $1 , 0 1 2 . 0 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 3 1 6 3 0 0 0 1 63 0 6 G R I M E S A V E N $1 , 0 1 0 . 3 9 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 2 3 26 0 0 7 00 2 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 61 1 3 J U N E A V E N $1 , 0 1 0 . 0 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 1 0 2 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 8 69 3 0 H A L I F A X A V E N $1 , 0 0 9 . 6 2 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 3 9 26 0 0 7 00 8 1 0 8 0 0 0 1 56 2 4 C A M D E N A V E N $1 , 0 0 9 . 2 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 3 1 Pa g e 2 0 2 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 8 4 4 7 0 0 0 1 53 1 1 E M E R S O N A V E N $1 , 0 0 8 . 2 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 1 1 9 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 5 54 3 2 B R Y A N T A V E N $1 , 0 0 6 . 3 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 0 4 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 3 3 3 0 0 0 8 47 0 0 6 3 R D A V E N $1 , 0 0 2 . 5 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 3 0 26 0 0 7 00 8 1 1 2 0 0 0 5 52 0 5 6 T H A V E N $1 , 0 0 1 . 6 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 3 4 26 0 0 7 00 8 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 53 2 4 E M E R S O N A V E N $1 , 0 0 1 . 1 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 1 4 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 8 6 6 0 0 0 5 63 0 1 U N I T Y A V E N $1 , 0 0 0 . 6 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 1 0 5 26 0 0 7 00 2 6 1 9 0 0 0 3 63 1 8 K Y L E A V E N $9 9 8 . 7 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 7 1 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 0 5 0 0 0 7 67 3 3 E M E R S O N A V E N $9 9 7 . 8 1 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 0 3 5 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 7 7 0 0 0 2 47 4 6 L A K E V I E W A V E $9 9 6 . 8 6 10 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 2 7 26 0 0 7 00 3 9 8 3 0 0 0 4 59 4 8 Z E N I T H A V E N $9 9 5 . 9 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 26 0 0 7 00 1 7 3 1 0 0 0 8 62 1 8 U N I T Y A V E N $9 9 5 . 9 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 7 8 26 0 0 7 00 7 6 2 1 0 0 0 1 55 4 0 M O R G A N A V E N $9 9 4 . 9 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 2 0 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 0 9 0 0 0 3 68 1 9 E M E R S O N A V E N $9 9 4 . 9 6 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 0 3 1 26 0 0 7 00 1 2 6 9 0 0 0 2 71 3 0 G R I M E S A V E N $9 9 3 . 1 0 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 6 2 26 0 0 7 00 2 6 2 3 0 0 0 7 43 0 9 6 4 T H A V E N $9 9 1 . 1 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 7 5 26 0 0 7 00 7 1 0 5 0 0 0 6 30 0 0 5 3 R D A V E N $9 9 0 . 2 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 0 2 5 26 0 0 7 00 7 7 6 5 0 0 0 7 14 2 4 5 5 T H A V E N $9 8 7 . 8 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 5 9 26 0 0 7 00 7 4 0 8 0 0 0 0 54 1 3 I R V I N G A V E N $9 8 7 . 3 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 1 4 0 26 0 0 7 00 8 2 6 2 0 0 0 3 54 3 0 C A M D E N A V E N $9 8 6 . 4 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 5 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 6 1 0 0 0 6 63 1 9 P E R R Y A V E N $9 8 6 . 4 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 7 7 26 0 0 7 00 3 1 1 8 0 0 0 7 65 4 3 B E A R D A V E N $9 8 6 . 4 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 6 0 26 0 0 7 00 3 5 6 4 0 0 0 1 33 1 2 L A W R E N C E R D $9 8 4 . 5 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 8 9 26 0 0 7 00 4 5 3 3 0 0 0 7 39 1 2 E C K B E R G D R $9 8 4 . 5 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 9 0 8 2 0 0 0 4 92 1 5 8 T H A V E N $9 8 0 . 4 2 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 5 1 26 0 0 7 00 9 3 9 5 0 0 0 6 60 3 5 L Y N D A L E A V E N $9 7 9 . 0 9 01 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 2 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 7 7 0 0 0 0 8 62 1 2 J U N E A V E N $9 7 8 . 0 8 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 9 5 26 0 0 7 00 1 2 6 9 0 0 0 9 16 0 1 I R V I N G L A N $9 7 6 . 9 1 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 1 0 1 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 4 8 0 0 0 5 70 3 1 G I R A R D A V E N $9 7 6 . 9 1 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 5 2 26 0 0 7 00 3 0 9 4 0 0 0 5 65 1 9 C H O W E N A V E N $9 7 5 . 9 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 4 8 26 0 0 7 00 5 8 4 7 0 0 0 1 66 4 5 B R Y A N T A V E N $9 7 5 . 9 6 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 4 0 0 5 2 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 7 7 0 7 54 4 0 P O N D S D R $9 7 5 . 2 4 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 5 57 1 8 D R E W A V E N $9 7 4 . 5 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 7 5 26 0 0 7 00 2 1 7 5 0 0 0 0 12 1 3 W O O D B I N E L A $9 7 4 . 3 4 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 7 2 26 0 0 7 00 5 8 2 4 0 0 0 8 66 2 0 B R Y A N T A V E N $9 7 4 . 3 4 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 4 0 0 1 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 7 72 1 2 A L D R I C H C T $9 7 4 . 3 4 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 4 0 26 0 0 7 00 2 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 1 J O Y C E L A $9 7 4 . 0 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 1 0 5 26 0 0 7 00 6 4 7 9 0 0 0 6 52 5 0 E W I N G A V E N $9 7 2 . 6 7 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 2 7 Pa g e 2 0 3 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 2 3 6 0 0 0 9 71 0 0 L O G A N A V E N $9 7 2 . 1 6 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 8 6 26 0 0 7 00 5 6 7 1 0 3 0 9 66 1 8 C A M D E N D R $9 6 8 . 0 1 36 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 9 7 26 0 0 7 00 3 4 6 9 0 0 0 7 64 0 7 B R O O K L Y N D R $9 6 6 . 4 6 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 1 3 26 0 0 7 00 6 1 1 7 0 0 0 2 67 2 4 A L D R I C H A V E N $9 6 6 . 4 6 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 1 0 0 9 2 26 0 0 7 00 7 5 6 1 0 0 0 3 56 2 6 L O G A N A V E N $9 6 5 . 5 1 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 0 7 9 26 0 0 7 00 3 4 0 7 0 0 0 2 63 0 5 B R O O K L Y N D R $9 6 4 . 5 6 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 8 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 71 0 0 H U M B O L D T A V E N $9 6 3 . 6 1 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 4 0 0 4 0 0 72 0 5 U N I T Y A V E N $9 6 2 . 3 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 1 0 0 26 0 0 7 00 3 0 4 8 0 0 0 2 65 2 6 F R A N C E A V E N $9 6 2 . 1 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 3 1 26 0 0 7 00 6 4 6 8 0 0 0 9 51 4 4 E W I N G A V E N $9 6 1 . 0 8 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 4 5 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 3 6 0 4 0 8 72 0 6 P E R R Y C T E $9 6 0 . 4 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 8 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 3 7 5 0 0 0 7 62 4 1 M A J O R A V E N $9 5 9 . 8 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 6 1 26 0 0 7 00 2 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 64 3 6 M A R L I N D R $9 5 9 . 8 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 8 8 26 0 0 7 00 7 5 0 6 0 0 0 1 55 2 0 J A M E S A V E N $9 5 7 . 9 1 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 1 1 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 7 68 2 5 T O L E D O A V E N $9 5 7 . 9 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 3 26 0 0 7 00 7 5 1 2 0 0 0 3 55 2 5 J A M E S A V E N $9 5 6 . 9 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 1 0 4 26 0 0 7 00 7 6 4 7 0 0 0 1 22 0 1 E R I C O N D R $9 5 6 . 0 1 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 6 6 26 0 0 7 00 4 2 0 7 0 0 0 2 38 1 3 6 1 S T A V E N $9 5 5 . 3 5 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 1 3 2 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 4 1 0 1 0 4 48 2 5 T W I N L A K E A V E $9 5 5 . 0 6 10 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 5 0 26 0 0 7 00 1 7 6 6 0 0 0 6 62 1 2 S C O T T A V E N $9 5 4 . 1 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 2 4 26 0 0 7 00 3 3 9 2 0 0 0 9 30 0 6 6 3 R D A V E N $9 5 3 . 1 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 2 26 0 0 7 00 2 1 1 3 0 0 0 5 70 2 5 F R E M O N T A V E N $9 5 3 . 1 6 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 6 1 26 0 0 7 00 5 0 3 9 0 0 0 9 72 2 5 D A L L A S R D $9 5 2 . 2 1 25 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 3 6 26 0 0 7 00 9 0 6 7 0 0 0 3 59 1 9 C O L F A X A V E N $9 5 1 . 8 9 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 2 2 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 5 6 0 2 53 2 0 P O N D S D R $9 5 0 . 0 9 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 8 3 9 0 0 0 5 31 0 7 6 7 T H A V E N $9 5 0 . 0 3 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 1 7 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 1 7 0 4 0 9 13 1 5 6 7 T H L N N $9 4 9 . 3 6 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 1 1 3 26 0 0 7 00 4 0 7 7 0 0 0 9 58 2 1 D R E W A V E N $9 4 9 . 3 6 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 2 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 70 1 9 L O G A N A V E N $9 4 8 . 4 1 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 4 3 26 0 0 7 00 8 7 4 4 0 0 0 6 57 4 3 H U M B O L D T A V E N $9 4 8 . 3 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 0 9 0 26 0 0 7 00 7 9 3 3 0 0 0 4 55 0 1 E M E R S O N A V E N $9 4 6 . 1 0 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 9 5 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 69 4 3 D R E W A V E N $9 4 5 . 9 4 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 4 9 2 2 0 6 0 0 58 3 5 L A K E C U R V E L A $9 4 5 . 5 6 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 5 1 26 0 0 7 00 1 4 7 4 0 0 0 3 47 2 8 W I N G A R D L N $9 4 5 . 2 5 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 2 0 5 26 0 0 7 00 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 5 13 0 1 7 2 N D A V E N $9 4 4 . 6 1 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 4 3 26 0 0 7 00 8 4 3 4 0 0 0 6 54 3 5 E M E R S O N A V E N $9 4 4 . 6 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 0 9 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 4 7 0 0 0 8 41 0 1 W O O D B I N E L A $9 4 2 . 3 6 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 6 5 Pa g e 2 0 4 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 3 7 0 9 0 0 0 7 33 1 9 6 3 R D A V E N $9 4 1 . 7 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 7 7 5 3 0 0 0 1 56 2 0 H U M B O L D T A V E N $9 4 1 . 7 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 5 6 8 0 0 0 4 44 0 1 6 5 T H A V E N $9 4 0 . 8 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 1 0 8 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 7 0 0 0 0 3 64 3 7 N O B L E A V E N $9 4 0 . 8 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 2 26 0 0 7 00 1 5 1 8 0 0 0 1 72 1 5 L E E A V E N $9 3 8 . 6 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 2 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 9 8 0 0 0 1 64 1 3 M A J O R A V E N $9 3 7 . 4 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 2 2 26 0 0 7 00 8 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 90 7 5 7 T H A V E N $9 3 7 . 0 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 8 9 0 0 0 1 54 4 4 D U P O N T A V E N $9 3 6 . 0 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 1 1 5 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 1 6 0 0 0 9 54 4 7 B R Y A N T A V E N $9 3 5 . 1 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 0 4 9 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 8 6 0 0 0 4 54 0 8 D U P O N T A V E N $9 3 1 . 3 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 1 0 6 26 0 0 7 00 8 5 0 4 0 0 0 1 54 1 6 G I R A R D A V E N $9 3 0 . 1 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 0 5 0 26 0 0 7 00 3 2 4 4 0 0 0 9 30 1 6 Q U A R L E S R D $9 2 9 . 7 9 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 8 1 26 0 0 7 00 9 4 0 5 0 0 0 4 59 3 5 L Y N D A L E A V E N $9 2 6 . 5 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 8 6 9 2 0 0 0 8 57 4 2 J A M E S A V E N $9 2 6 . 2 8 02 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 0 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 1 3 5 0 0 0 6 67 0 1 Q U A I L A V E N $9 2 6 . 2 8 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 7 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 2 7 0 0 0 2 72 1 9 O L I V E R A V E N $9 2 5 . 2 1 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 1 0 3 26 0 0 7 00 8 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 55 1 9 C O L F A X A V E N $9 2 3 . 7 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 7 3 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 1 47 0 2 6 9 T H A V E N $9 2 3 . 4 1 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 0 2 26 0 0 7 00 1 9 0 5 0 0 0 8 51 2 4 H O W E L A $9 2 2 . 7 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 6 0 26 0 0 7 00 3 9 2 3 0 0 0 7 59 1 8 X E R X E S A V E N $9 2 2 . 7 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 2 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 2 7 0 0 0 7 63 3 0 P E R R Y A V E N $9 2 2 . 7 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 6 0 26 0 0 7 00 3 5 5 4 0 2 0 1 32 1 3 L A W R E N C E R D $9 2 0 . 8 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 1 1 2 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 9 2 0 0 0 9 64 2 4 Q U A I L A V E N $9 2 0 . 6 2 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 1 0 1 26 0 0 7 00 7 7 1 6 0 0 0 7 22 2 9 B R O O K V I E W D R $9 2 0 . 2 9 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 7 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 8 7 6 0 0 0 3 64 1 3 U N I T Y A V E N $9 1 8 . 8 9 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 9 5 26 0 0 7 00 7 3 3 9 0 0 0 4 54 3 3 K N O X A V E N $9 1 7 . 0 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 0 1 8 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 2 8 0 0 0 0 69 1 3 M O R G A N A V E N $9 1 7 . 0 6 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 8 0 8 1 0 0 0 2 56 0 1 A L D R I C H A V E N $9 1 6 . 1 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 9 1 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 8 6 0 0 0 7 63 4 0 Q U A I L A V E N $9 1 5 . 1 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 9 5 26 0 0 7 00 8 7 9 6 0 0 0 3 61 0 1 F R E M O N T A V E N $9 1 3 . 9 3 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 1 0 26 0 0 7 00 6 5 4 2 0 0 0 9 38 0 0 5 2 N D A V E N $9 1 0 . 4 1 10 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 5 8 9 7 0 0 0 0 66 0 7 C O L F A X A V E N $9 1 0 . 4 1 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 4 0 0 3 5 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 6 6 0 0 0 3 71 4 8 M O R G A N A V E N $9 1 0 . 0 0 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 3 4 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 4 6 0 0 0 3 54 1 2 C O L F A X A V E N $9 0 8 . 5 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 0 5 9 26 0 0 7 00 7 4 7 1 0 0 0 2 56 0 0 I R V I N G A V E N $9 0 7 . 5 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 0 2 0 26 0 0 7 00 8 4 4 4 0 0 0 4 53 3 9 E M E R S O N A V E N $9 0 6 . 6 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 1 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 9 3 7 0 0 0 0 5 60 0 6 C A M D E N A V E N $9 0 5 . 6 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 3 6 Pa g e 2 0 5 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 6 4 5 1 0 0 0 8 50 1 3 D R E W A V E N $9 0 1 . 8 6 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 5 0 26 0 0 7 00 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 3 68 3 6 O R C H A R D A V E N $9 0 1 . 8 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 9 2 6 0 0 0 0 8 57 3 1 A L D R I C H A V E N $8 9 9 . 6 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 4 0 26 0 0 7 00 7 9 6 1 0 0 0 9 56 0 0 E M E R S O N A V E N $8 9 8 . 1 7 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 1 1 26 0 0 7 00 3 6 8 7 0 0 0 3 30 1 3 N A S H R D $8 9 7 . 1 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 3 8 26 0 0 7 00 1 9 5 9 0 0 0 3 51 1 8 6 6 T H A V E N $8 9 7 . 1 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 1 0 6 26 0 0 7 00 3 4 3 4 0 0 0 9 27 0 0 O H E N R Y R D $8 9 4 . 2 6 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 8 2 26 0 0 7 00 7 9 7 7 0 0 0 1 56 0 1 D U P O N T A V E N $8 9 4 . 2 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 7 26 0 0 7 00 7 5 1 9 0 0 0 6 56 1 9 J A M E S A V E N $8 9 4 . 2 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 0 5 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 8 3 1 0 0 0 5 63 3 7 I N D I A N A A V E N $8 9 4 . 0 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 4 1 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 7 6 0 0 0 8 72 5 4 D U P O N T A V E N $8 9 3 . 3 6 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 7 5 0 2 0 0 0 5 56 0 2 J A M E S A V E N $8 9 3 . 3 1 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 0 5 1 26 0 0 7 00 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 1 72 3 6 K N O X A V E N $8 9 3 . 3 1 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 1 0 5 26 0 0 7 00 7 6 4 0 0 0 0 8 55 0 6 O L I V E R A V E N $8 9 2 . 3 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 6 1 26 0 0 7 00 7 3 0 6 0 0 0 3 18 2 1 5 5 T H A V E N $8 8 8 . 5 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 0 3 1 26 0 0 7 00 3 4 8 2 0 0 0 0 28 1 3 6 5 T H A V E N $8 8 7 . 6 0 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 3 0 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 9 5 0 0 6 54 3 5 7 2 N D C I R $8 8 7 . 3 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 4 6 26 0 0 7 00 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 6 72 1 8 A L D R I C H C T $8 8 6 . 6 6 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 3 9 26 0 0 7 00 3 1 0 3 0 0 0 4 34 0 9 6 6 T H A V E N $8 8 4 . 7 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 7 5 26 0 0 7 00 2 9 3 2 0 0 0 3 42 0 6 W I N C H E S T E R L A $8 8 4 . 7 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 4 0 0 4 0 26 0 0 7 00 3 2 7 9 0 0 0 7 30 0 6 6 5 T H A V E N $8 8 4 . 7 4 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 9 7 26 0 0 7 00 0 5 7 4 0 0 0 4 69 1 9 Q U A I L A V E N $8 8 2 . 5 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 5 1 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 5 8 0 0 0 4 71 1 3 H A L I F A X A V E N $8 8 1 . 1 4 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 7 6 26 0 0 7 00 6 7 1 3 0 0 0 2 38 5 3 O A K S T $8 8 0 . 0 1 10 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 7 8 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 9 2 3 0 0 53 3 2 7 1 S T C I R $8 7 9 . 7 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 6 4 3 4 0 0 0 0 52 2 1 D R E W A V E N $8 7 9 . 0 6 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 7 26 0 0 7 00 4 5 1 6 0 0 0 8 39 0 6 5 6 T H A V E N $8 7 8 . 1 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 4 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 3 3 4 0 0 0 8 72 3 6 D U P O N T A V E N $8 7 8 . 1 1 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 6 1 26 0 0 7 00 0 7 6 6 0 0 0 2 67 0 6 E W I N G A V E N $8 7 6 . 8 8 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 2 5 5 9 0 0 0 5 63 4 2 L E E A V E N $8 7 5 . 9 3 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 9 1 26 0 0 7 00 0 7 8 8 0 0 0 6 68 0 1 D R E W A V E N $8 7 5 . 9 3 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 2 0 0 4 7 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 1 8 0 2 0 2 71 1 2 P E R R Y P L $8 7 5 . 9 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 6 9 8 1 0 0 0 7 33 2 0 4 9 T H A V E N $8 7 5 . 2 6 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 0 7 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 8 4 0 0 0 3 69 3 0 Q U A I L A V E N $8 7 3 . 9 0 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 3 5 26 0 0 7 00 2 9 2 7 0 0 0 0 65 1 2 I N D I A N A A V E N $8 7 3 . 4 9 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 4 0 0 2 0 26 0 0 7 00 3 7 6 2 0 0 0 1 28 0 7 N A S H R D $8 7 1 . 5 6 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 3 7 26 0 0 7 00 1 8 1 8 0 0 0 4 62 0 0 Q U A I L A V E N $8 6 9 . 5 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 1 7 Pa g e 2 0 6 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 9 1 5 4 0 0 0 7 58 5 1 B R Y A N T A V E N $8 6 9 . 2 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 9 4 26 0 0 7 00 6 4 8 9 0 0 0 4 52 0 7 E W I N G A V E N $8 6 7 . 6 6 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 6 2 26 0 0 7 00 8 4 4 6 0 0 0 2 53 1 3 E M E R S O N A V E N $8 6 7 . 6 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 1 1 8 26 0 0 7 00 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 6 67 3 0 T O L E D O A V E N $8 6 7 . 3 8 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 2 0 0 4 1 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 51 1 3 W I N C H E S T E R L A $8 6 6 . 4 3 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 3 0 26 0 0 7 00 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 5 68 3 0 Q U A I L A V E N $8 6 5 . 3 2 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 6 1 26 0 0 7 00 3 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 30 1 9 Q U A R L E S R D $8 6 4 . 8 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 1 2 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 6 9 0 0 0 6 64 4 3 N O B L E A V E N $8 6 3 . 8 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 26 0 0 7 00 7 5 7 8 0 0 0 4 55 4 1 L O G A N A V E N $8 6 1 . 9 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 8 8 1 8 0 0 0 7 57 0 7 F R E M O N T A V E N $8 6 1 . 6 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 1 2 26 0 0 7 00 8 7 5 0 0 0 0 7 57 0 0 H U M B O L D T A V E N $8 6 1 . 6 7 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 4 1 5 7 0 0 0 2 59 1 3 P E A R S O N D R $8 6 1 . 0 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 3 8 26 0 0 7 00 8 7 9 5 0 0 0 4 61 0 7 F R E M O N T A V E N $8 6 0 . 7 3 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 1 3 6 0 0 0 5 67 0 7 Q U A I L A V E N $8 6 0 . 7 3 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 7 8 26 0 0 7 00 3 6 9 9 0 0 0 9 31 0 7 6 3 R D A V E N $8 5 9 . 1 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 0 6 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 7 9 0 5 0 3 16 0 5 6 7 T H L N N $8 5 7 . 8 8 35 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 5 5 26 0 0 7 00 9 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 60 1 3 C O L F A X A V E N $8 5 7 . 6 5 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 1 5 26 0 0 7 00 5 6 7 0 0 6 0 7 66 3 4 C A M D E N D R $8 5 6 . 2 6 36 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 9 1 26 0 0 7 00 4 6 8 1 0 0 0 7 53 5 5 N O R T H P O R T D R $8 5 5 . 7 7 03 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 3 2 26 0 0 7 00 7 2 7 8 0 0 0 7 53 4 4 M O R G A N A V E N $8 5 5 . 3 8 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 5 7 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 9 2 5 0 8 53 4 4 7 1 S T C I R $8 5 1 . 2 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 1 7 3 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 8 0 2 0 6 69 0 4 U N I T Y A V E N $8 5 1 . 0 4 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 4 8 26 0 0 7 00 3 1 4 3 0 0 0 6 63 5 3 H A L I F A X D R $8 5 0 . 0 0 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 0 2 26 0 0 7 00 6 5 2 0 0 0 0 5 51 2 4 F R A N C E A V E N $8 4 9 . 8 0 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 8 2 26 0 0 7 00 2 1 5 5 0 0 0 3 52 1 9 6 5 T H A V E N $8 4 9 . 6 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 3 3 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 2 9 0 8 0 9 29 3 3 6 9 T H L N N $8 4 9 . 3 3 35 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 0 2 6 26 0 0 7 00 4 8 1 3 0 0 0 8 57 1 9 H A L I F A X A V E N $8 4 9 . 3 3 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 0 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 2 4 0 3 0 9 68 4 5 Y O R K P L $8 4 7 . 4 3 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 9 4 5 0 4 71 8 8 U N I T Y A V E N $8 4 5 . 8 6 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 4 0 26 0 0 7 00 8 2 6 1 0 0 0 4 54 2 8 C A M D E N A V E N $8 4 5 . 8 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 8 6 26 0 0 7 00 0 9 8 9 0 0 0 3 37 0 1 U R B A N A V E $8 4 5 . 5 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 1 7 0 0 0 1 52 2 5 W I N C H E S T E R L A $8 4 5 . 5 3 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 3 8 26 0 0 7 00 7 2 5 1 0 0 0 8 53 1 8 N E W T O N A V E N $8 4 4 . 1 7 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 1 2 26 0 0 7 00 7 5 8 4 0 0 0 6 56 3 3 L O G A N A V E N $8 4 3 . 6 3 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 0 5 26 0 0 7 00 4 2 8 9 0 0 0 3 58 2 5 H A L I F A X A V E N $8 4 3 . 6 3 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 1 0 0 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 9 9 2 0 6 71 5 7 U N I T Y A V E N $8 4 2 . 6 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 8 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 3 7 9 0 0 0 3 62 1 7 M A J O R A V E N $8 4 2 . 0 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 6 5 Pa g e 2 0 7 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 8 52 4 4 G R E A T V I E W A V E $8 4 1 . 0 6 10 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 2 2 26 0 0 7 00 2 3 2 2 0 0 0 1 64 0 1 L E E A V E N $8 4 0 . 1 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 8 26 0 0 7 00 3 7 3 7 0 0 0 3 29 0 7 6 3 R D A V E N $8 3 9 . 1 6 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 2 4 26 0 0 7 00 8 2 9 2 0 1 0 6 80 1 B E L L V U E L A $8 3 8 . 5 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 1 3 7 26 0 0 7 00 3 3 3 9 0 0 0 5 32 1 2 P O E R D $8 3 8 . 2 2 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 5 7 26 0 0 7 00 8 9 4 6 0 0 0 2 59 4 6 E M E R S O N A V E N $8 3 6 . 9 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 1 5 26 0 0 7 00 7 4 7 5 0 0 0 8 55 2 4 I R V I N G A V E N $8 3 6 . 7 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 0 2 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 69 4 3 P A L M E R L A K E D R W $8 3 6 . 0 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 9 3 26 0 0 7 00 9 3 3 6 0 0 0 8 60 0 7 C A M D E N A V E N $8 3 4 . 1 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 6 8 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 1 8 0 5 0 9 71 0 6 P E R R Y P L $8 3 4 . 1 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 2 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 9 4 8 0 1 54 4 7 7 2 N D C I R $8 3 3 . 8 5 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 4 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 4 6 0 0 0 0 9 72 0 6 N O B L E A V E N $8 3 1 . 2 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 4 9 26 0 0 7 00 3 3 9 5 0 0 0 6 29 1 8 6 3 R D A V E N $8 2 9 . 6 6 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 9 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 2 4 0 0 0 4 69 0 6 N E W T O N A V E N $8 2 9 . 2 6 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 2 0 26 0 0 7 00 2 8 3 7 0 0 0 9 63 0 1 I N D I A N A A V E N $8 2 8 . 5 5 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 4 7 26 0 0 7 00 1 2 9 2 0 0 0 3 71 1 9 G R I M E S A V E N $8 2 8 . 4 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 3 7 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 2 2 0 0 0 1 54 0 5 B R Y A N T A V E N $8 2 8 . 0 5 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 0 5 7 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 4 8 0 0 0 7 72 2 5 H A L I F A X A V E N $8 2 6 . 7 7 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 6 6 26 0 0 7 00 8 9 9 5 0 0 0 2 57 1 5 D U P O N T A V E N $8 2 6 . 5 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 2 3 26 0 0 7 00 7 0 8 0 0 0 0 5 53 0 8 L I L A C D R N $8 2 5 . 8 6 03 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 0 2 2 26 0 0 7 00 8 6 5 2 0 0 0 6 57 2 7 K N O X A V E N $8 2 4 . 6 3 02 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 0 1 2 26 0 0 7 00 1 8 2 2 0 0 0 8 61 0 6 Q U A I L A V E N $8 2 4 . 0 4 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 9 8 9 0 0 0 0 6 64 3 0 H U M B O L D T A V E N $8 2 3 . 6 8 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 4 4 26 0 0 7 00 7 9 9 4 0 0 0 0 55 4 4 D U P O N T A V E N $8 2 1 . 1 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 8 2 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 7 7 0 0 0 2 48 0 6 6 9 T H A V E N $8 2 1 . 0 7 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 0 3 26 0 0 7 00 9 4 0 9 0 0 0 0 60 5 5 9 T H A V E N $8 2 1 . 0 0 01 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 2 9 26 0 0 7 00 3 2 5 1 0 0 0 9 30 2 5 Q U A R L E S R D $8 2 0 . 1 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 8 4 26 0 0 7 00 8 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 55 1 3 B R Y A N T A V E N $8 2 0 . 0 2 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 5 3 26 0 0 7 00 9 2 9 4 0 0 0 8 60 2 4 A L D R I C H A V E N $8 1 9 . 8 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 7 3 26 0 0 7 00 3 9 2 4 0 0 0 6 59 1 2 X E R X E S A V E N $8 1 8 . 2 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 2 8 26 0 0 7 00 2 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 63 2 6 R E G E N T A V E N $8 1 7 . 6 0 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 1 3 3 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 6 4 0 0 0 6 69 2 5 N E W T O N A V E N $8 1 5 . 4 1 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 2 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 0 8 0 0 0 7 36 1 6 V I O L E T A V E $8 1 2 . 2 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 1 2 2 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 1 8 0 4 0 0 71 0 8 P E R R Y P L $8 1 2 . 2 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 2 3 26 0 0 7 00 4 4 4 3 0 0 0 6 57 2 4 D R E W A V E N $8 1 0 . 1 6 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 7 4 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 1 7 2 3 0 6 68 3 9 F R E M O N T P L N $8 0 7 . 8 1 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 1 0 1 26 0 0 7 00 4 6 6 5 0 0 0 7 36 0 0 5 3 R D A V E N $8 0 6 . 5 8 03 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 5 7 Pa g e 2 0 8 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 3 5 0 5 0 8 49 0 6 W I N G A R D P L $8 0 6 . 5 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 1 8 7 26 0 0 7 00 0 9 4 9 0 0 0 2 68 0 6 B E A R D A V E N $8 0 6 . 5 8 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 3 8 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 9 6 0 0 0 1 70 1 9 P A L M E R L A K E D R W $8 0 6 . 5 4 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 8 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 3 6 0 1 0 1 72 0 0 P E R R Y C T E $8 0 4 . 6 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 9 2 26 0 0 7 00 9 3 6 8 0 0 0 9 59 5 8 C A M D E N A V E N $8 0 3 . 7 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 2 5 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 5 3 0 0 0 5 81 5 7 3 R D A V E N $8 0 2 . 2 7 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 9 36 1 9 7 2 N D A V E N $8 0 1 . 8 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 8 6 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 2 6 0 0 0 8 63 2 4 P E R R Y A V E N $8 0 1 . 5 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 6 1 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 1 5 0 0 0 0 54 5 3 B R Y A N T A V E N $8 0 0 . 6 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 0 4 8 26 0 0 7 00 9 2 3 3 0 0 0 2 61 0 7 A L D R I C H A V E N $7 9 9 . 9 3 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 9 6 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 7 9 0 4 0 4 16 0 1 6 7 T H L N N $7 9 9 . 2 6 35 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 5 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 4 4 5 0 0 0 6 16 1 2 W O O D B I N E L A $7 9 9 . 2 6 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 9 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 5 3 0 0 0 9 21 1 9 7 0 T H A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 9 6 26 0 0 7 00 3 7 4 7 0 0 0 1 27 1 2 N A S H R D $7 9 9 . 2 6 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 3 5 5 0 0 0 0 7 31 1 7 L A W R E N C E R D $7 9 9 . 2 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 1 0 8 26 0 0 7 00 2 8 8 7 0 0 0 8 45 1 2 6 5 T H A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 3 0 0 8 0 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 0 8 0 0 0 2 51 0 7 W I N C H E S T E R L A $7 9 9 . 2 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 2 9 26 0 0 7 00 4 6 8 4 0 0 0 4 53 4 8 N O R T H P O R T D R $7 9 9 . 2 6 03 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 4 2 26 0 0 7 00 8 4 7 1 0 0 0 0 54 5 2 F R E M O N T A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 1 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 7 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 55 2 5 J U D Y L A $7 9 9 . 2 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 8 2 26 0 0 7 00 7 4 5 3 0 0 0 4 55 2 7 H U M B O L D T A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 2 26 0 0 7 00 7 5 8 1 0 0 0 9 56 0 1 L O G A N A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 1 2 0 26 0 0 7 00 8 0 5 0 0 0 0 9 56 3 0 B R Y A N T A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 9 6 26 0 0 7 00 4 0 8 5 0 0 0 9 58 2 6 E W I N G A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 3 4 26 0 0 7 00 3 9 4 3 0 0 0 3 60 1 3 X E R X E S A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 1 0 0 3 8 26 0 0 7 00 3 9 4 6 0 1 0 9 60 1 8 Y O R K A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 1 0 0 4 0 26 0 0 7 00 3 8 4 5 0 0 0 2 61 0 1 X E R X E S A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 7 26 0 0 7 00 5 6 7 1 0 2 0 0 66 2 0 C A M D E N D R $7 9 9 . 2 6 36 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 9 6 26 0 0 7 00 5 7 7 2 0 0 0 0 67 3 6 C O L F A X A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 1 0 0 3 7 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 8 7 0 0 0 8 69 1 2 M O R G A N A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 3 70 0 0 H U M B O L D T A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 8 1 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 1 9 0 0 0 8 70 0 1 D U P O N T A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 1 0 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 70 0 7 D U P O N T A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 0 6 0 0 0 4 70 1 3 J A M E S A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 3 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 2 3 0 0 0 3 70 1 8 I R V I N G A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 5 6 26 0 0 7 00 5 0 5 8 0 0 0 5 71 1 2 D A L L A S R D $7 9 9 . 2 6 25 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 6 0 26 0 0 7 00 2 3 2 8 0 0 0 6 72 0 0 D U P O N T A V E N $7 9 9 . 2 6 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 5 5 Pa g e 2 0 9 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 7 1 0 0 0 3 91 2 W O O D B I N E L A $7 9 9 . 2 6 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 7 3 5 9 0 0 0 9 53 0 0 K N O X A V E N $7 9 9 . 1 9 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 0 6 0 26 0 0 7 00 6 4 1 4 0 0 0 4 51 0 0 D R E W A V E N $7 9 8 . 8 6 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 5 5 26 0 0 7 00 9 9 9 9 0 4 1 1 13 6 0 S H I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G S T E 2 0 6 $7 9 8 . 0 8 03 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 0 4 5 26 0 0 7 00 8 7 9 4 0 0 0 5 61 1 5 F R E M O N T A V E N $7 9 8 . 0 3 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 0 8 26 0 0 7 00 0 1 3 8 0 0 0 6 64 3 2 W I L L O W L A N $7 9 8 . 0 3 36 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 6 70 2 5 I R V I N G A V E N $7 9 7 . 4 1 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 4 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 5 8 0 0 54 0 0 P O N D S D R $7 9 7 . 3 6 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 8 9 5 0 0 0 6 33 0 1 6 8 T H A V E N $7 9 7 . 0 8 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 5 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 9 12 0 5 6 3 R D L A N $7 9 6 . 8 0 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 3 9 0 0 0 5 16 1 2 7 1 S T A V E N $7 9 6 . 6 5 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 3 2 26 0 0 7 00 9 9 9 9 0 6 5 6 68 1 9 5 T H S T R E E T N O R T H $7 9 6 . 1 3 36 - 1 1 9 - 2 1 - 1 2 - 0 0 9 6 26 0 0 7 00 9 3 7 3 0 0 0 2 60 2 4 C A M D E N A V E N $7 9 5 . 1 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 3 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 1 5 0 0 0 6 70 0 0 H A L I F A X A V E N $7 9 4 . 2 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 4 1 26 0 0 7 00 5 6 7 2 0 2 0 9 66 0 1 C A M D E N D R $7 9 3 . 2 8 36 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 1 0 5 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 0 7 0 0 0 3 42 0 0 W O O D B I N E L A $7 9 2 . 3 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 8 3 26 0 0 7 00 8 8 4 1 0 0 0 8 14 0 0 5 7 T H A V E N $7 9 0 . 4 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 0 7 26 0 0 7 00 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 8 70 0 1 Q U A I L A V E N $7 9 0 . 4 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 4 7 26 0 0 7 00 1 4 6 5 0 0 0 4 72 3 0 N O B L E A V E N $7 9 0 . 4 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 1 26 0 0 7 00 1 2 4 1 0 0 0 2 70 1 8 L O G A N A V E N $7 8 7 . 5 8 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 0 8 26 0 0 7 00 0 9 0 4 0 0 0 5 30 0 7 6 8 T H A V E N $7 8 7 . 0 3 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 7 2 26 0 0 7 00 8 7 2 4 0 0 0 0 58 0 6 I R V I N G A V E N $7 8 6 . 6 3 02 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 0 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 3 2 2 0 0 0 2 10 0 5 7 2 N D A V E N $7 8 6 . 2 6 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 6 6 26 0 0 7 00 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 54 1 3 6 8 T H A V E N $7 8 1 . 8 8 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 2 0 0 3 1 26 0 0 7 00 9 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 62 2 1 C O L F A X A V E N $7 8 1 . 8 8 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 6 6 26 0 0 7 00 3 2 0 7 0 0 0 4 31 1 8 6 6 T H A V E N $7 7 9 . 5 5 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 4 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 9 1 1 0 0 0 8 45 1 3 W I N C H E S T E R L A $7 7 7 . 2 3 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 3 0 0 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 9 5 8 0 8 53 4 7 7 2 N D C I R $7 7 2 . 7 7 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 5 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 5 7 0 0 0 7 34 1 2 7 2 N D A V E N $7 7 2 . 3 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 1 1 26 0 0 7 00 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 5 64 0 6 C O L F A X A V E N $7 6 9 . 5 3 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 0 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 6 S C O T T A V E N $7 6 9 . 5 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 4 0 1 4 0 8 72 3 5 U N I T Y A V E N $7 6 8 . 8 5 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 5 6 0 0 0 9 70 3 7 D R E W A V E N $7 6 8 . 5 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 9 4 2 0 0 0 3 52 1 9 H O W E L A $7 6 8 . 4 7 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 8 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 7 2 0 2 54 3 0 P O N D S D R $7 6 7 . 9 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 4 0 0 1 0 3 71 8 9 U N I T Y A V E N $7 6 7 . 6 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 9 7 26 0 0 7 00 3 1 4 9 0 0 0 0 63 2 9 H A L I F A X D R $7 6 4 . 7 8 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 0 9 Pa g e 2 1 0 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 9 6 0 0 0 0 34 0 6 W O O D B I N E L A $7 6 4 . 5 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 3 26 0 0 7 00 6 5 5 6 0 0 0 2 52 1 7 G R E A T V I E W A V E $7 6 2 . 8 8 10 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 2 7 26 0 0 7 00 6 9 4 6 0 0 0 1 49 4 8 Z E N I T H A V E N $7 6 2 . 5 2 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 0 2 8 26 0 0 7 00 9 2 3 4 0 0 0 1 81 0 6 1 S T A V E N $7 6 1 . 9 3 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 9 7 26 0 0 7 00 4 4 7 8 0 0 0 4 39 1 8 5 7 T H A V E N $7 6 1 . 7 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 5 0 26 0 0 7 00 8 9 8 3 0 0 0 6 59 0 1 D U P O N T A V E N $7 6 0 . 0 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 8 26 0 0 7 00 8 8 8 7 0 0 0 3 11 1 2 6 2 N D A V E N $7 5 9 . 0 8 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 1 7 26 0 0 7 00 3 4 7 4 0 0 0 0 26 1 9 6 5 T H A V E N $7 5 8 . 1 3 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 2 2 26 0 0 7 00 9 2 1 9 0 0 0 0 62 4 0 B R Y A N T A V E N $7 5 5 . 2 8 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 7 8 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 2 6 0 1 0 9 68 0 8 Y O R K P L $7 5 1 . 8 0 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 9 26 0 0 7 00 8 8 3 3 0 0 0 8 58 0 7 G I R A R D A V E N $7 5 1 . 4 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 5 5 26 0 0 7 00 4 4 2 1 0 0 0 2 56 6 1 N O R T H P O R T D R $7 5 0 . 0 0 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 5 5 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 7 71 2 4 M O R G A N A V E N $7 5 0 . 0 0 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 3 0 26 0 0 7 00 5 0 9 8 0 0 0 7 72 3 6 R I V E R D A L E R D $7 5 0 . 0 0 25 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 5 0 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 0 1 0 8 72 4 0 U N I T Y A V E N $7 5 0 . 0 0 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 3 1 0 1 0 2 29 0 4 6 7 T H L N N $7 4 9 . 5 8 35 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 0 4 2 26 0 0 7 00 7 0 8 4 0 0 0 1 53 2 4 L I L A C D R N $7 4 9 . 4 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 0 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 67 2 5 R E G E N T A V E N $7 4 8 . 6 3 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 0 9 0 0 0 5 69 3 3 M A J O R A V E N $7 4 8 . 6 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 3 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 8 9 0 3 72 7 4 U N I T Y A V E N $7 4 6 . 0 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 5 6 0 0 0 7 70 3 7 P E R R Y A V E N $7 4 5 . 7 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 1 8 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 4 0 1 9 0 3 72 4 5 U N I T Y A V E N $7 4 5 . 7 1 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 4 0 5 6 0 0 0 4 33 1 5 5 9 T H A V E N $7 4 4 . 7 5 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 0 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 4 9 9 0 0 0 4 44 0 6 7 1 S T A V E N $7 4 3 . 8 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 5 5 3 7 0 0 0 6 65 4 2 R I V E R W O O D L A $7 4 1 . 3 5 36 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 1 4 1 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 7 5 0 9 54 3 6 P O N D S D R $7 4 0 . 3 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 3 7 6 3 0 0 0 0 28 0 1 N A S H R D $7 3 7 . 7 1 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 3 6 26 0 0 7 00 8 8 2 3 0 0 0 0 57 2 4 G I R A R D A V E N $7 3 4 . 3 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 4 1 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 3 7 0 0 0 0 40 0 8 7 2 N D A V E N $7 3 3 . 4 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 2 5 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 5 5 0 0 0 9 72 0 7 P A L M E R L A K E D R W $7 3 3 . 4 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 5 7 7 0 0 0 9 72 0 0 J U N E A V E N $7 3 1 . 5 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 1 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 6 6 0 0 0 4 69 3 7 N E W T O N A V E N $7 2 9 . 2 6 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 9 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 8 3 4 0 0 0 4 62 3 1 P E R R Y A V E N $7 2 8 . 9 1 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 3 8 26 0 0 7 00 9 0 6 1 0 0 0 9 60 0 7 C O L F A X A V E N $7 2 8 . 6 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 8 6 7 6 0 0 0 8 58 1 5 J A M E S A V E N $7 2 6 . 7 8 02 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 0 2 9 26 0 0 7 00 9 0 7 6 0 0 0 2 58 1 7 C O L F A X A V E N $7 2 6 . 7 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 2 2 26 0 0 7 00 0 7 0 3 0 0 0 8 67 2 7 G R I M E S A V E N $7 2 6 . 7 8 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 1 0 0 2 0 Pa g e 2 1 1 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 3 0 6 7 0 0 0 8 65 3 3 D R E W A V E N $7 2 5 . 8 3 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 3 6 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 8 69 1 5 M A J O R A V E N $7 2 5 . 8 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 4 2 26 0 0 7 00 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 7 67 2 4 W I L L O W L A N $7 2 4 . 3 4 36 1 1 9 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 5 26 0 0 7 00 8 9 6 1 0 0 0 2 61 3 0 E M E R S O N A V E N $7 2 2 . 9 8 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 3 0 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 9 69 2 4 F R A N C E A V E N $7 2 2 . 9 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 5 0 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 8 8 8 0 3 70 8 1 U N I T Y A V E N $7 2 2 . 9 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 1 4 2 26 0 0 7 00 0 9 3 5 0 0 0 8 68 2 5 Z E N I T H A V E N $7 2 2 . 0 3 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 6 8 26 0 0 7 00 2 7 5 3 0 1 0 8 62 0 4 F R A N C E A V E N $7 2 1 . 1 3 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 5 7 26 0 0 7 00 4 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 57 0 7 H A L I F A X A V E N $7 2 0 . 4 0 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 0 6 26 0 0 7 00 2 8 2 3 0 0 0 5 64 3 7 I N D I A N A A V E N $7 2 0 . 3 5 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 3 3 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 1 4 0 0 0 7 69 3 6 H A L I F A X A V E N $7 1 9 . 3 4 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 4 0 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 4 7 0 0 0 1 70 1 2 E W I N G A V E N $7 1 9 . 1 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 3 2 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 9 1 0 0 0 6 36 1 3 V I O L E T A V E $7 1 7 . 2 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 1 2 6 26 0 0 7 00 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 66 0 7 C H O W E N A V E N $7 1 1 . 0 0 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 1 5 26 0 0 7 00 9 2 0 9 0 0 0 2 61 1 4 B R Y A N T A V E N $7 1 0 . 6 3 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 1 2 26 0 0 7 00 9 9 4 4 0 0 0 2 64 4 3 E M E R S O N A V E N $7 1 0 . 6 3 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 8 3 26 0 0 7 00 7 2 4 8 0 0 0 4 53 3 6 N E W T O N A V E N $7 1 0 . 2 2 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 7 0 0 4 54 2 6 P O N D S D R $7 1 0 . 0 4 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 5 6 7 0 0 2 0 1 66 4 4 C A M D E N D R $7 1 0 . 0 0 36 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 8 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 3 0 6 0 0 0 2 72 0 0 B R Y A N T A V E N $7 0 9 . 6 0 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 3 5 26 0 0 7 00 9 4 0 4 0 0 0 5 59 3 7 L Y N D A L E A V E N $7 0 8 . 7 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 3 26 0 0 7 00 8 7 7 0 0 0 0 3 60 3 2 H U M B O L D T A V E N $7 0 8 . 7 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 9 0 26 0 0 7 00 0 8 5 4 0 0 0 8 59 3 0 E A R L E B R O W N D R $7 0 8 . 1 1 02 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 0 8 0 0 0 3 72 0 4 H U M B O L D T A V E N $7 0 6 . 7 1 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 5 8 26 0 0 7 00 3 7 2 1 0 0 0 1 62 3 6 C H O W E N A V E N $7 0 6 . 6 9 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 1 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 7 1 3 0 0 0 6 67 2 8 G R I M E S A V E N $7 0 5 . 8 8 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 1 0 0 1 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 1 4 2 0 0 0 7 68 0 1 Q U A I L A V E N $7 0 5 . 8 8 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 7 2 26 0 0 7 00 3 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 6 6 5 T H A V E N $7 0 5 . 7 6 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 1 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 9 4 1 0 0 0 2 44 0 6 W I N C H E S T E R L A $7 0 5 . 3 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 3 0 0 4 5 26 0 0 7 00 1 5 4 1 0 0 0 2 72 0 1 K Y L E A V E N $7 0 5 . 0 2 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 8 2 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 7 9 0 0 0 5 72 4 3 B R Y A N T A V E N $7 0 4 . 9 3 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 4 5 26 0 0 7 00 7 7 5 4 0 0 0 0 56 1 0 H U M B O L D T A V E N $7 0 4 . 8 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 6 8 26 0 0 7 00 9 0 5 8 0 0 0 4 60 2 5 C O L F A X A V E N $7 0 3 . 9 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 1 3 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 2 6 0 0 0 7 53 2 7 B R Y A N T A V E N $7 0 3 . 7 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 1 3 0 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 4 0 0 1 53 1 1 P O N D S D R $7 0 2 . 3 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 8 6 2 0 3 54 3 0 7 0 T H C I R $7 0 2 . 0 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 1 1 0 26 0 0 7 00 4 7 2 4 0 0 0 6 56 4 9 N O R T H P O R T D R $7 0 0 . 1 8 03 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 1 0 Pa g e 2 1 2 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 7 8 0 0 0 9 70 1 8 M O R G A N A V E N $6 9 9 . 2 6 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 5 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 0 6 0 0 0 6 71 2 4 N E W T O N A V E N $6 9 9 . 2 6 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 4 8 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 3 1 0 7 0 6 29 2 8 6 7 T H L N N $6 9 9 . 2 3 35 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 0 4 8 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 1 7 0 0 0 6 37 2 4 V I O L E T A V E $6 9 9 . 2 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 9 9 26 0 0 7 00 3 4 5 3 0 0 0 5 64 0 0 X E R X E S A V E N $6 9 9 . 2 3 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 3 6 26 0 0 7 00 2 1 4 4 0 0 0 7 64 0 1 S C O T T A V E N $6 9 8 . 0 6 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 4 5 26 0 0 7 00 4 2 3 2 0 0 0 1 58 0 8 P E A R S O N D R $6 9 7 . 9 3 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 9 2 9 1 0 0 0 1 60 0 6 A L D R I C H A V E N $6 9 5 . 4 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 7 6 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 14 0 6 7 2 N D A V E N $6 9 3 . 0 9 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 3 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 5 8 8 0 0 0 8 70 2 4 R E G E N T A V E N $6 9 1 . 6 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 5 8 26 0 0 7 00 3 0 5 9 0 0 0 8 36 0 8 6 6 T H A V E N $6 9 1 . 1 9 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 3 7 8 0 0 0 0 9 62 1 9 B R O O K L Y N D R $6 9 1 . 1 0 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 6 3 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 3 9 0 0 0 1 70 0 7 E W I N G A V E N $6 8 8 . 7 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 4 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 8 9 6 0 0 0 5 32 1 9 6 8 T H A V E N $6 8 8 . 5 8 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 8 0 26 0 0 7 00 8 9 5 6 0 0 0 9 61 0 0 E M E R S O N A V E N $6 8 7 . 8 3 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 2 5 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 5 1 0 0 0 1 72 0 7 H A L I F A X A V E N $6 8 7 . 8 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 5 2 7 0 0 0 0 71 2 4 L E E A V E N $6 8 6 . 8 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 1 2 26 0 0 7 00 8 8 1 4 0 0 0 1 57 3 7 F R E M O N T A V E N $6 8 5 . 9 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 3 8 26 0 0 7 00 3 9 4 8 0 0 0 8 60 1 2 Y O R K A V E N $6 8 5 . 9 3 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 1 0 0 3 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 4 0 3 2 0 6 72 7 3 U N I T Y A V E N $6 8 4 . 3 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 9 5 1 0 0 0 9 46 1 9 6 6 T H A V E N $6 8 1 . 8 5 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 3 0 0 2 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 2 9 0 9 0 8 29 2 9 6 9 T H L N N $6 8 1 . 1 8 35 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 0 2 5 26 0 0 7 00 9 0 9 6 0 0 0 8 59 2 6 C O L F A X A V E N $6 8 1 . 1 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 1 0 8 26 0 0 7 00 1 4 9 5 0 0 0 8 45 0 7 7 1 S T A V E N $6 8 0 . 2 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 5 9 26 0 0 7 00 9 0 3 1 0 0 0 6 61 1 4 D U P O N T A V E N $6 8 0 . 2 3 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 3 6 26 0 0 7 00 2 5 7 6 0 0 0 4 63 4 3 K Y L E A V E N $6 8 0 . 1 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 7 6 26 0 0 7 00 2 5 5 1 0 0 0 3 62 4 2 L E E A V E N $6 7 9 . 1 4 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 3 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 9 0 2 0 5 54 3 3 7 1 S T C I R $6 7 8 . 3 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 1 5 2 26 0 0 7 00 7 6 9 0 0 0 0 7 20 0 9 B R O O K V I E W D R $6 7 7 . 7 2 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 5 5 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 3 0 1 2 0 0 29 1 1 6 8 T H L N N $6 7 7 . 3 8 35 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 0 3 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 7 9 0 0 0 9 44 0 7 7 1 S T A V E N $6 7 7 . 3 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 1 2 4 26 0 0 7 00 7 3 2 8 0 0 0 7 53 1 9 K N O X A V E N $6 7 7 . 1 0 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 0 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 8 0 7 0 0 0 0 5 55 3 1 C A M D E N A V E N $6 7 7 . 1 0 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 1 0 2 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 2 5 0 4 0 1 50 0 1 W I N G A R D P L $6 7 6 . 7 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 5 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 3 2 0 0 0 4 69 3 7 M O R G A N A V E N $6 7 5 . 0 0 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 6 6 26 0 0 7 00 8 8 9 6 0 0 0 2 60 5 3 E M E R S O N A V E N $6 7 4 . 1 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 4 6 26 0 0 7 00 9 3 0 5 0 0 0 5 62 1 5 C A M D E N A V E N $6 7 3 . 4 3 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 4 5 Pa g e 2 1 3 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 4 2 7 7 0 0 0 7 58 3 0 A D M I R A L L A $6 7 2 . 9 6 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 8 5 26 0 0 7 00 7 1 2 0 0 0 0 7 53 0 7 P E N N A V E N $6 7 2 . 3 5 02 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 0 4 3 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 73 1 W O O D B I N E L A $6 7 1 . 9 0 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 7 5 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 2 2 0 3 54 1 5 P O N D S D R $6 7 0 . 6 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 9 1 7 8 0 0 0 9 57 2 8 B R Y A N T A V E N $6 6 9 . 7 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 4 5 26 0 0 7 00 8 9 1 7 0 0 0 7 58 0 7 E M E R S O N A V E N $6 6 9 . 7 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 7 5 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 4 0 2 7 0 3 72 6 3 U N I T Y A V E N $6 6 8 . 1 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 4 2 4 8 0 0 0 3 38 1 1 C O M M O D O R E D R $6 6 7 . 6 0 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 2 3 26 0 0 7 00 8 9 0 8 0 0 0 8 59 2 1 E M E R S O N A V E N $6 6 6 . 9 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 9 5 26 0 0 7 00 7 6 5 3 0 0 0 2 23 1 3 E R I C O N D R $6 6 6 . 8 1 02 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 4 1 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 8 2 0 0 4 69 0 1 U N I T Y A V E N $6 6 4 . 0 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 5 8 26 0 0 7 00 8 0 4 4 0 0 0 8 56 3 7 B R Y A N T A V E N $6 6 3 . 1 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 1 1 26 0 0 7 00 9 2 4 0 0 0 0 3 60 0 9 A L D R I C H A V E N $6 6 2 . 1 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 8 3 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 3 4 0 9 53 2 5 P O N D S D R $6 5 9 . 6 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 8 7 8 0 5 71 3 3 U N I T Y A V E N $6 5 9 . 3 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 1 3 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 3 2 0 3 0 9 28 1 2 6 7 T H L N N $6 5 8 . 3 8 35 1 1 9 2 1 2 3 0 0 1 5 26 0 0 7 00 9 8 9 7 0 0 0 9 64 1 9 G I R A R D A V E N $6 5 8 . 1 0 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 7 0 26 0 0 7 00 9 0 0 6 0 0 0 7 58 0 8 D U P O N T A V E N $6 5 7 . 4 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 2 6 26 0 0 7 00 9 3 6 4 0 0 0 3 59 2 6 C A M D E N A V E N $6 5 7 . 4 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 9 9 7 5 0 0 0 4 63 3 7 D U P O N T A V E N $6 5 7 . 4 3 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 2 26 0 0 7 00 9 3 2 9 0 0 0 7 61 0 1 C A M D E N A V E N $6 5 7 . 4 1 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 8 9 26 0 0 7 00 9 3 8 7 0 0 0 6 61 2 7 L Y N D A L E A V E N $6 5 4 . 5 8 36 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 8 0 4 5 0 0 0 7 56 4 3 B R Y A N T A V E N $6 5 4 . 4 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 1 3 26 0 0 7 00 0 8 9 7 0 0 0 4 32 1 3 6 8 T H A V E N $6 5 4 . 1 8 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 7 9 26 0 0 7 00 8 7 6 6 0 0 0 9 60 0 6 H U M B O L D T A V E N $6 5 4 . 0 2 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 8 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 2 2 3 0 0 0 7 72 0 1 F R A N C E A V E N $6 5 3 . 6 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 0 8 26 0 0 7 00 2 5 4 2 0 0 0 5 61 3 6 L E E A V E N $6 5 3 . 3 5 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 4 3 26 0 0 7 00 4 3 3 3 0 0 0 9 40 1 3 6 1 S T A V E N $6 5 1 . 7 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 1 2 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 6 3 0 0 0 5 72 3 1 G I R A R D A V E N $6 4 9 . 2 6 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 2 6 26 0 0 7 00 3 8 4 3 0 0 0 4 30 1 2 6 1 S T A V E N $6 4 5 . 9 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 5 26 0 0 7 00 6 4 9 1 0 0 0 0 51 4 9 E W I N G A V E N $6 4 3 . 8 5 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 8 7 7 0 0 0 2 64 1 9 U N I T Y A V E N $6 4 3 . 6 2 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 9 4 26 0 0 7 00 8 8 8 5 0 0 0 5 11 0 0 6 2 N D A V E N $6 4 3 . 1 8 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 1 5 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 51 1 9 W I N C H E S T E R L A $6 4 1 . 2 8 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 3 1 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 2 8 0 0 0 4 71 1 9 E W I N G A V E N $6 4 0 . 7 2 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 4 9 0 0 0 0 3 71 1 9 M A J O R A V E N $6 4 0 . 3 3 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 5 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 5 8 0 0 0 1 63 3 7 P E R R Y A V E N $6 3 9 . 2 0 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 7 4 Pa g e 2 1 4 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 9 1 6 0 0 0 0 9 58 0 7 B R Y A N T A V E N $6 3 9 . 1 0 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 1 0 0 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 6 7 0 0 0 2 71 4 2 M O R G A N A V E N $6 3 8 . 8 2 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 3 3 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 1 6 0 1 54 2 9 P O N D S D R $6 3 5 . 8 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 1 3 0 4 54 3 5 P O N D S D R $6 3 5 . 8 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 8 7 0 5 72 7 0 U N I T Y A V E N $6 3 5 . 8 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 9 9 1 4 0 0 0 8 64 1 8 G I R A R D A V E N $6 3 5 . 5 8 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 5 3 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 2 4 0 1 54 1 1 P O N D S D R $6 3 2 . 3 9 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 7 3 4 0 0 0 1 67 0 1 F R A N C E A V E N $6 3 1 . 5 3 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 1 0 0 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 1 2 5 0 0 0 1 14 1 3 6 3 R D L A N $6 3 0 . 5 7 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 8 8 26 0 0 7 00 7 0 8 9 0 0 0 6 53 4 4 L I L A C D R N $6 2 9 . 6 0 02 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 0 1 1 26 0 0 7 00 8 4 3 4 0 1 0 5 54 3 1 E M E R S O N A V E N $6 2 7 . 9 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 0 9 5 26 0 0 7 00 8 6 3 5 0 2 0 6 57 2 4 L O G A N A V E N $6 2 7 . 9 8 02 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 1 0 5 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 8 4 2 0 8 53 2 5 7 0 T H C I R $6 2 7 . 1 0 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 9 0 26 0 0 7 00 6 8 8 8 0 0 0 1 50 1 3 Z E N I T H A V E N $6 2 6 . 4 7 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 0 7 9 26 0 0 7 00 9 9 1 8 0 0 0 4 13 0 7 6 5 T H A V E N $6 2 4 . 1 8 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 3 8 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 4 6 0 0 0 6 17 0 1 A M Y L A $6 2 4 . 1 8 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 1 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 8 8 1 0 0 0 2 31 1 2 T H U R B E R R D $6 2 4 . 1 8 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 8 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 0 9 0 0 0 1 42 1 2 W O O D B I N E L A $6 2 4 . 1 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 8 5 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 1 7 0 4 0 1 48 0 7 W I N G A R D P L $6 2 4 . 1 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 7 9 4 7 0 0 0 8 56 3 7 E M E R S O N A V E N $6 2 4 . 1 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 1 0 7 26 0 0 7 00 8 8 0 9 0 0 0 8 58 1 9 F R E M O N T A V E N $6 2 4 . 1 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 4 5 26 0 0 7 00 9 1 5 6 0 0 0 5 58 3 5 B R Y A N T A V E N $6 2 4 . 1 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 9 7 26 0 0 7 00 8 9 3 5 0 1 0 4 59 0 0 E M E R S O N A V E N $6 2 4 . 1 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 9 1 2 7 0 0 0 1 62 2 5 B R Y A N T A V E N $6 2 4 . 1 8 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 4 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 3 3 0 8 0 3 66 3 7 X E R X E S P L N $6 2 4 . 1 8 35 1 1 9 2 1 2 3 0 0 7 6 26 0 0 7 00 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 3 67 3 6 T O L E D O A V E N $6 2 4 . 1 8 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 2 0 0 4 0 26 0 0 7 00 0 7 4 4 0 0 0 9 68 0 6 F R A N C E A V E N $6 2 4 . 1 8 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 2 0 0 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 3 8 5 0 0 0 3 69 0 0 L E E A V E N $6 2 4 . 1 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 1 8 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 69 1 8 H A L I F A X A V E N $6 2 4 . 1 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 3 7 26 0 0 7 00 1 4 1 7 0 0 0 3 69 3 0 I N D I A N A A V E N $6 2 4 . 1 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 2 1 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 1 8 0 0 0 6 70 4 2 F R A N C E A V E N $6 2 4 . 1 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 6 1 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 1 7 0 0 0 2 70 4 2 H U M B O L D T A V E N $6 2 4 . 1 8 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 7 4 26 0 0 7 00 9 2 6 5 0 0 0 3 71 3 5 8 T H A V E N $6 2 4 . 1 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 3 5 26 0 0 7 00 9 1 6 9 0 0 0 0 91 6 5 7 T H A V E N $6 2 4 . 1 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 1 0 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 1 7 0 9 0 4 13 3 5 6 7 T H L N N $6 2 3 . 7 1 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 1 1 8 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 0 6 0 0 0 1 54 0 0 B R Y A N T A V E N $6 2 2 . 0 1 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 0 4 1 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 3 2 0 1 53 2 9 P O N D S D R $6 2 1 . 6 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 Pa g e 2 1 5 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 3 5 3 6 0 2 0 4 62 2 4 B R O O K L Y N D R $6 2 1 . 2 8 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 7 5 2 0 0 0 8 68 2 5 E W I N G A V E N $6 1 5 . 3 5 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 2 0 0 6 3 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 8 8 0 0 0 7 69 0 6 M O R G A N A V E N $6 1 3 . 3 9 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 8 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 8 8 6 0 5 71 0 1 U N I T Y A V E N $6 1 1 . 8 9 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 1 4 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 3 67 1 8 Q U A I L A V E N $6 1 0 . 1 0 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 8 4 26 0 0 7 00 3 4 6 1 0 0 0 5 27 1 2 6 4 T H A V E N $6 1 0 . 0 3 35 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 4 5 26 0 0 7 00 8 7 5 2 0 0 0 5 57 1 2 H U M B O L D T A V E N $6 0 9 . 4 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 1 0 26 0 0 7 00 9 9 9 9 0 7 7 1 61 3 5 C A M D E N A V E N $6 0 7 . 4 8 36 - 1 9 9 - 2 1 - 3 4 - 0 1 0 1 26 0 0 7 00 0 9 8 5 0 0 0 7 37 1 9 U R B A N A V E $6 0 5 . 8 5 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 6 6 26 0 0 7 00 9 9 9 9 0 3 9 6 55 0 0 B R O O K L Y N B L V D S T E 1 0 2 $6 0 5 . 4 0 03 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 0 3 2 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 8 5 0 7 72 6 6 U N I T Y A V E N $6 0 3 . 5 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 7 6 1 9 0 0 0 5 55 5 6 M O R G A N A V E N $6 0 0 . 6 0 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 2 2 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 4 0 1 6 0 6 72 3 9 U N I T Y A V E N $6 0 0 . 3 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 3 9 1 3 0 0 0 9 59 4 9 W A S H B U R N A V E N $5 9 9 . 3 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 1 7 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 4 72 2 5 N E W T O N A V E N $5 9 9 . 3 6 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 7 2 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 5 5 0 0 0 6 72 3 1 M O R G A N A V E N $5 9 9 . 2 6 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 5 5 26 0 0 7 00 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 7 53 1 8 6 8 T H A V E N $5 9 6 . 8 3 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 2 0 0 5 6 26 0 0 7 00 2 1 1 6 0 0 0 2 70 4 3 F R E M O N T A V E N $5 9 6 . 6 5 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 5 8 26 0 0 7 00 7 1 6 6 0 0 0 2 23 1 8 5 5 T H A V E N $5 9 6 . 3 5 02 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 7 5 0 1 0 0 0 6 56 1 2 J A M E S A V E N $5 9 5 . 2 8 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 0 5 0 26 0 0 7 00 7 1 5 4 0 0 0 6 54 1 9 Q U E E N A V E N $5 9 5 . 2 1 02 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 0 1 5 26 0 0 7 00 3 2 9 3 0 0 0 9 32 1 3 6 5 T H A V E N $5 9 4 . 2 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 1 1 8 26 0 0 7 00 2 7 8 7 0 2 0 7 62 2 6 F R A N C E A V E N $5 9 3 . 7 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 5 7 26 0 0 7 00 1 7 9 9 0 0 0 7 61 0 7 Q U A I L A V E N $5 9 1 . 6 0 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 3 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 3 4 1 1 0 7 66 6 9 X E R X E S P L N $5 9 1 . 6 0 35 1 1 9 2 1 2 3 0 0 5 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 7 63 4 2 C O L F A X A V E N $5 9 1 . 3 2 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 1 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 9 9 1 0 7 71 5 3 U N I T Y A V E N $5 8 7 . 5 2 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 8 8 26 0 0 7 00 3 0 4 7 0 1 0 2 65 3 2 F R A N C E A V E N $5 8 7 . 1 5 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 3 0 26 0 0 7 00 7 2 0 2 0 0 0 8 21 0 7 5 5 T H A V E N $5 8 6 . 8 5 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 1 1 8 26 0 0 7 00 9 2 4 1 0 0 0 2 60 0 1 A L D R I C H A V E N $5 8 5 . 7 8 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 8 4 26 0 0 7 00 9 0 3 8 0 0 0 9 62 1 8 D U P O N T A V E N $5 8 4 . 2 6 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 7 3 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 8 72 2 8 H U M B O L D T A V E N $5 8 3 . 1 4 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 5 3 26 0 0 7 00 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 69 1 8 M A J O R A V E N $5 8 3 . 0 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 3 2 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 2 7 0 0 0 3 47 1 1 T W I N L A K E A V E $5 8 2 . 1 0 10 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 1 9 8 26 0 0 7 00 2 0 6 7 0 0 0 0 49 1 8 6 3 R D A V E N $5 8 2 . 1 0 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 8 3 26 0 0 7 00 0 1 5 3 0 0 0 3 68 1 8 Q U A I L A V E N $5 8 2 . 1 0 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 6 2 26 0 0 7 00 1 1 7 2 0 0 0 8 38 0 6 7 2 N D A V E N $5 8 1 . 8 2 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 6 3 Pa g e 2 1 6 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 5 5 5 0 0 0 9 63 1 8 L E E A V E N $5 7 9 . 9 0 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 8 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 7 5 9 0 0 0 3 39 1 3 J O Y C E L A $5 7 9 . 8 2 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 1 0 6 26 0 0 7 00 6 5 4 3 0 0 0 8 38 0 6 5 2 N D A V E N $5 7 8 . 1 8 10 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 1 5 26 0 0 7 00 8 5 3 2 0 0 0 7 53 3 8 H U M B O L D T A V E N $5 7 7 . 3 5 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 0 2 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 1 6 0 0 0 2 70 0 1 I R V I N G A V E N $5 7 6 . 8 0 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 4 8 26 0 0 7 00 4 4 8 1 0 0 0 9 39 0 7 F R A N C E P L $5 7 5 . 9 0 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 4 7 26 0 0 7 00 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 2 11 1 8 6 2 N D A V E N $5 7 5 . 4 8 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 1 8 26 0 0 7 00 3 0 7 2 0 0 0 1 66 0 6 D R E W A V E N $5 7 2 . 6 0 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 1 8 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 4 0 2 0 0 0 72 4 7 U N I T Y A V E N $5 7 2 . 2 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 8 5 3 6 0 0 0 3 54 2 2 H U M B O L D T A V E N $5 7 0 . 9 9 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 0 6 6 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 1 7 1 0 0 1 13 3 9 6 7 T H L N N $5 6 7 . 8 5 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 1 1 9 26 0 0 7 00 6 8 8 3 0 0 0 6 50 2 4 Z E N I T H A V E N $5 6 7 . 8 5 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 0 7 6 26 0 0 7 00 9 0 2 2 0 0 0 7 60 0 6 D U P O N T A V E N $5 6 7 . 8 5 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 5 2 26 0 0 7 00 0 1 4 6 0 0 0 3 68 2 5 Q U A I L A V E N $5 6 7 . 8 5 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 6 8 26 0 0 7 00 6 4 1 8 0 0 0 0 51 3 2 D R E W A V E N $5 6 5 . 1 9 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 0 0 5 0 26 0 0 7 00 3 0 4 4 0 0 0 6 37 0 1 6 6 T H A V E N $5 6 3 . 1 0 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 2 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 7 8 0 1 0 5 10 1 3 W O O D B I N E L A $5 6 2 . 4 4 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 4 4 26 0 0 7 00 8 1 0 7 0 0 0 2 56 3 2 C A M D E N A V E N $5 5 8 . 3 5 01 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 0 0 3 0 26 0 0 7 00 2 5 7 4 0 0 0 6 64 0 7 K Y L E A V E N $5 5 8 . 3 5 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 1 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 4 9 2 8 0 1 0 9 58 0 1 S H O R E S D R $5 5 6 . 5 9 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 2 5 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 2 9 0 6 54 0 1 P O N D S D R $5 5 0 . 3 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 1 5 0 2 54 3 1 P O N D S D R $5 5 0 . 3 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 0 6 0 3 72 5 0 U N I T Y A V E N $5 5 0 . 3 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 8 6 0 6 72 6 8 U N I T Y A V E N $5 5 0 . 3 8 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 5 8 1 4 0 0 0 0 68 4 5 B R Y A N T A V E N $5 4 9 . 4 2 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 1 0 0 3 5 26 0 0 7 00 5 8 2 0 0 0 0 2 81 1 6 7 T H A V E N $5 4 9 . 4 2 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 4 0 0 1 3 26 0 0 7 00 5 0 4 4 0 0 0 2 72 0 1 D A L L A S R D $5 4 9 . 1 8 25 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 0 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 9 3 8 2 0 0 0 1 52 1 6 2 N D A V E N $5 4 9 . 1 0 36 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 3 2 26 0 0 7 00 1 6 2 9 0 7 0 0 29 3 7 6 9 T H L N N $5 4 7 . 3 0 35 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 7 6 0 0 0 5 70 4 0 D R E W A V E N $5 4 7 . 3 0 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 1 26 0 0 7 00 7 4 6 7 0 0 0 8 56 2 4 I R V I N G A V E N $5 4 4 . 2 3 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 0 1 6 26 0 0 7 00 0 5 6 7 0 0 0 3 70 1 9 Q U A I L A V E N $5 3 9 . 3 5 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 4 4 26 0 0 7 00 6 5 4 6 0 0 0 5 52 2 2 G R E A T V I E W A V E $5 3 8 . 5 3 10 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 1 9 26 0 0 7 00 7 3 3 2 0 0 0 1 53 4 3 K N O X A V E N $5 3 7 . 2 6 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 0 0 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 7 0 0 0 0 4 90 6 W O O D B I N E L A $5 3 6 . 6 3 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 0 0 2 2 26 0 0 7 00 7 3 2 9 0 0 0 6 53 2 5 K N O X A V E N $5 3 6 . 1 5 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 0 7 0 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 8 5 0 0 7 53 1 8 7 0 T H C I R $5 3 5 . 3 1 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 9 8 Pa g e 2 1 7 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 2 9 9 0 0 0 3 17 1 3 7 0 T H A V E N $5 3 2 . 9 3 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 4 1 26 0 0 7 00 3 0 6 9 0 0 0 6 36 0 1 6 6 T H A V E N $5 2 9 . 9 0 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 3 4 26 0 0 7 00 2 3 1 9 0 0 0 6 64 1 9 L E E A V E N $5 2 9 . 8 5 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 5 26 0 0 7 00 3 7 8 8 0 2 0 9 61 1 9 B E A R D A V E N $5 2 5 . 1 0 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 6 3 26 0 0 7 00 2 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 40 1 2 J A N E T L A $5 2 4 . 6 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 8 6 3 5 0 0 0 8 57 1 6 L O G A N A V E N $5 2 3 . 4 9 02 1 1 8 2 1 1 4 0 1 0 7 26 0 0 7 00 5 6 7 7 0 0 0 6 67 1 3 5 T H S T N $5 2 0 . 9 6 36 1 1 9 2 1 1 2 0 0 5 7 26 0 0 7 00 9 9 9 9 0 3 3 1 13 6 0 S H I N G L E C R E E K X I N G S T E 2 0 8 $5 1 9 . 0 9 03 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 0 4 5 26 0 0 7 00 2 7 6 6 0 0 0 4 41 1 3 J O Y C E L A $5 1 6 . 3 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 9 9 26 0 0 7 00 1 2 8 8 0 1 0 5 15 0 7 H U M B O L D T P L N $5 1 5 . 6 0 35 1 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 0 3 4 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 0 2 0 0 0 5 53 2 4 B R Y A N T A V E N $5 1 5 . 6 0 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 0 3 6 26 0 0 7 00 1 8 8 5 0 0 0 2 65 1 9 U N I T Y A V E N $5 1 5 . 6 0 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 5 0 8 0 0 0 0 7 71 2 5 R I V E R D A L E R D $5 1 5 . 6 0 25 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 1 4 26 0 0 7 00 6 1 2 3 0 0 0 4 67 2 5 C A M D E N A V E N $5 1 5 . 0 0 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 26 0 0 7 00 1 7 9 1 0 0 0 5 62 0 6 R E G E N T A V E N $5 1 3 . 9 3 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 4 0 0 5 5 26 0 0 7 00 9 9 3 9 0 0 0 9 64 1 8 F R E M O N T A V E N $5 1 0 . 8 5 36 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 3 1 26 0 0 7 00 7 3 9 8 0 0 0 2 53 0 5 I R V I N G A V E N $5 0 9 . 0 0 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 0 4 5 26 0 0 7 00 3 2 3 6 0 0 0 9 32 1 2 Q U A R L E S R D $5 0 8 . 3 4 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 4 0 0 7 3 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 2 5 0 0 0 9 63 1 8 P E R R Y A V E N $5 0 5 . 4 7 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 6 2 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 67 1 3 A L D R I C H A V E N $5 0 4 . 1 2 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 1 0 0 8 5 26 0 0 7 00 8 4 3 3 0 0 0 7 54 4 7 E M E R S O N A V E N $5 0 4 . 0 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 3 0 0 9 3 26 0 0 7 00 1 3 6 0 0 0 0 7 16 1 8 A M Y L A $5 0 2 . 6 5 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 5 3 26 0 0 7 00 7 2 0 8 0 0 0 2 22 1 2 5 5 T H A V E N $5 0 1 . 3 5 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 1 4 7 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 69 3 1 O L I V E R A V E N $4 9 9 . 2 7 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 1 0 2 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 1 8 0 2 0 0 13 0 9 6 8 T H L N N $4 9 9 . 2 6 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 0 6 3 26 0 0 7 00 3 0 7 4 0 0 0 9 35 0 9 6 6 T H A V E N $4 9 6 . 6 0 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 5 9 26 0 0 7 00 4 9 2 8 0 3 0 7 58 0 5 S H O R E S D R $4 9 6 . 6 0 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 2 7 26 0 0 7 00 8 9 8 6 0 0 0 3 58 2 5 D U P O N T A V E N $4 9 2 . 6 3 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 9 3 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 1 7 0 0 54 2 7 P O N D S D R $4 9 0 . 4 7 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 9 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 59 2 9 C A M D E N A V E N $4 8 7 . 1 0 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 6 26 0 0 7 00 3 9 2 8 0 0 0 2 58 4 2 X E R X E S A V E N $4 8 4 . 9 2 02 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 1 0 26 0 0 7 00 0 9 9 8 0 0 0 2 36 0 6 U R B A N A V E $4 8 3 . 0 2 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 9 6 26 0 0 7 00 6 7 3 3 0 0 0 8 51 2 0 T W I N L A K E B L V D E $4 8 1 . 9 0 10 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 0 0 5 7 26 0 0 7 00 2 2 1 7 0 0 0 9 53 1 2 6 3 R D A V E N $4 7 9 . 8 7 33 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 1 2 0 26 0 0 7 00 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 5 67 0 7 G R I M E S A V E N $4 7 7 . 8 6 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 1 0 0 2 3 26 0 0 7 00 6 0 1 8 2 0 0 8 13 1 2 6 8 T H L N N $4 7 7 . 6 0 36 1 1 9 2 1 2 2 0 0 5 8 26 0 0 7 00 9 3 7 8 0 0 0 7 61 0 6 C A M D E N A V E N $4 7 7 . 6 0 36 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 2 8 Pa g e 2 1 8 o f 2 6 9 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 7 6 1 0 5 54 0 6 P O N D S D R $4 7 4 . 8 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 2 6 4 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 37 0 6 U R B A N A V E $4 7 3 . 5 2 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 2 5 26 0 0 7 00 4 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 57 3 0 N O R T H P O R T D R $4 6 7 . 4 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 8 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 3 3 8 0 0 0 3 45 0 7 K A T H R E N E D R $4 6 5 . 6 1 34 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 0 5 3 26 0 0 7 00 4 6 3 9 0 0 0 0 53 4 9 S A I L O R L A $4 6 4 . 9 1 03 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 0 1 3 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 8 1 3 0 3 69 2 9 U N I T Y A V E N $4 6 3 . 9 5 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 6 5 26 0 0 7 00 8 9 7 0 0 0 0 1 60 3 5 D U P O N T A V E N $4 6 2 . 1 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 3 2 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 8 22 0 0 6 9 T H A V E N $4 6 0 . 6 0 26 1 1 9 2 1 3 4 0 0 0 3 26 0 0 7 00 1 8 8 8 0 0 0 9 66 0 1 U N I T Y A V E N $4 5 9 . 7 8 33 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 7 7 26 0 0 7 00 1 5 7 3 0 0 0 3 71 1 2 J U N E A V E N $4 5 9 . 7 8 27 1 1 9 2 1 3 2 0 1 0 3 26 0 0 7 00 1 4 6 1 0 0 0 5 17 1 2 7 2 N D A V E N $4 5 9 . 1 0 26 1 1 9 2 1 4 1 0 0 7 6 26 0 0 7 00 4 4 6 1 0 0 0 3 39 0 0 F R A N C E P L $4 5 8 . 6 9 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 4 0 0 3 4 26 0 0 7 00 8 3 6 0 0 0 0 4 54 1 7 C O L F A X A V E N $4 5 7 . 5 5 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 4 0 1 0 8 26 0 0 7 00 9 9 9 9 0 3 5 6 13 0 0 S H I N G L E C R E E K X I N G S T E 1 0 6 $4 5 4 . 9 8 03 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 0 4 0 26 0 0 7 00 4 9 2 7 0 6 0 5 58 1 9 S H O R E S D R $4 5 4 . 6 2 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 3 0 0 3 4 26 0 0 7 00 7 9 0 8 0 0 0 5 56 1 5 F R E M O N T A V E N $4 5 4 . 0 6 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 2 3 26 0 0 7 00 7 1 7 2 0 0 0 4 54 1 8 P E N N A V E N $4 5 3 . 8 5 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 3 0 1 3 1 26 0 0 7 00 7 3 1 7 0 0 0 0 53 3 8 L O G A N A V E N $4 5 3 . 0 0 02 1 1 8 2 1 4 4 0 0 0 2 26 0 0 7 00 8 9 7 6 0 0 0 5 59 5 1 D U P O N T A V E N $4 5 1 . 9 7 01 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 26 0 0 7 00 2 7 8 7 0 1 0 8 62 1 8 F R A N C E A V E N $4 5 1 . 0 4 34 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 5 7 26 0 0 7 00 6 9 0 3 0 0 0 2 34 0 0 5 0 T H A V E N $4 5 0 . 8 8 10 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 0 0 3 4 26 0 0 7 00 7 7 7 8 0 0 0 2 56 2 5 G I R A R D A V E N $4 5 0 . 3 4 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 4 8 26 0 0 7 00 1 0 8 6 0 0 0 3 37 0 1 V I O L E T A V E $4 5 0 . 0 0 27 1 1 9 2 1 4 2 0 1 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 9 8 4 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 6 6 T H A V E N $4 5 0 . 0 0 34 1 1 9 2 1 2 3 0 0 0 7 26 0 0 7 00 3 0 7 1 0 1 0 1 66 1 3 D R E W A V E N $4 5 0 . 0 0 34 1 1 9 2 1 1 3 0 0 8 6 26 0 0 7 00 4 3 7 6 0 0 0 7 59 2 5 J U N E A V E N $4 4 0 . 7 9 03 1 1 8 2 1 2 2 0 0 2 2 26 0 0 7 00 0 6 3 8 0 3 0 5 69 0 8 U N I T Y A V E N $4 2 9 . 1 3 28 1 1 9 2 1 4 3 0 0 4 9 26 0 0 7 00 2 1 6 2 0 0 0 5 70 3 1 E M E R S O N A V E N $4 1 9 . 9 1 25 1 1 9 2 1 3 3 0 0 2 8 26 0 0 7 00 6 9 2 7 0 0 0 4 32 0 1 4 9 T H A V E N $4 1 1 . 2 1 10 1 1 8 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 7 00 7 9 8 9 0 0 0 7 56 2 4 D U P O N T A V E N $4 1 0 . 6 0 01 1 1 8 2 1 3 1 0 0 2 4 87 8 To t a l B a l a n c e : $8 6 2 , 4 1 0 . 4 8 Pa g e 2 1 9 o f 2 6 9 Re p o r t N a m e : S A _ M a s t e r Pr i n t e d : 1 0 / 8 / 2 0 2 5 Pa g e : 1 Sp e c i a l A s s e s s m e n t M a s t e r R e p o r t S/ A N u m b e r : 2 6 0 0 8 Ci t y o f B ro o k l y n C e n t e r Pa y m e n t N u m b e r : 0 Of : 5 S/ A N u m b e r : 2 6 0 0 8 As s e s s m e n t T o t a l : $0 . 0 0 In t e re s t R a t e : 7. 0 0 0 0 1st Y r . I n t . M o n t h s : 13 1st Y r . P a y a b l e : 2 0 2 6 De s c r i p t i o n : 20 2 5 U t i l i t y R e p a i r Op e n e d D a t e : 09 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 4 1s t H e a r i n g : 2n d H e a r i n g : Le v i e d : 12 / 0 1 / 2 0 2 5 Am o r t i z a t i o n T y p e : S Co u n t y A d m i n F e e : $0 . 0 0 St a t u s : Pe n d i n g Pro j e c t N b r : Fu n d : Co n t r a c t N b r : Fi n A c c t N b r : 49 1 4 1 - 4 7 0 5 Re s o l u t i o n N u m b e r : Gr a c e P e r i o d E n d D a t e : 12 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 5 Ca t e g o r y : Ca l c D a i l y I n t e re s t : No Co n t i n u e C a l c u l a t i n g D e f e r re d : N o In t A c c t N b r : 49 1 4 1 - 4 7 0 5 Su b S t a t u s : St re e t N a m e Cl o s e d D e s c To t a l A s s e s s m e n t Pa y o f f A m t Pro p e r t y I D Ho u s e Un i t St Or i g A s s e s s m e n t $5 , 9 7 5 . 0 0 02 - 11 8 - 2 1 - 2 2 - 0 0 2 6 59 0 0 Xe r x e s A v e N $5 , 9 7 5 . 0 0 A $5 , 9 7 5 . 0 0 $3 , 0 5 1 . 0 0 02 - 11 8 - 2 1 - 3 3 - 0 0 2 7 28 0 0 53 r d A v e N $3 , 0 5 1 . 0 0 A $3 , 0 5 1 . 0 0 $5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 02 - 11 8 - 2 1 - 4 4 - 0 0 1 8 54 3 3 Kn o x A v e N $5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 A $5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $8 , 6 7 0 . 0 0 26 - 11 9 - 2 1 - 4 3 - 0 0 1 2 69 3 0 Mo rg a n A v e N $8 , 6 7 0 . 0 0 A $8 , 6 7 0 . 0 0 $7 , 0 6 0 . 0 0 26 - 11 9 - 2 1 - 4 4 - 0 0 7 9 17 0 8 69 t h A v e N $7 , 0 6 0 . 0 0 A $7 , 0 6 0 . 0 0 A T o t a l : $3 0 , 2 5 6 . 0 0 5 A C o u n t : $3 0 , 2 5 6 . 0 0 $3 0 , 2 5 6 . 0 0 Gr a n d T o t a l : $3 0 , 2 5 6 . 0 0 5 To t a l C o u n t : $3 0 , 2 5 6 . 0 0 $3 0 , 2 5 6 . 0 0 Pa g e 2 2 0 o f 2 6 9 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. _______________ RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR EMERGENCY PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICE REPAIRS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, pursuant to the City’s Emergency Private Utility Service Repair Assessment Policy provides assistance to Brooklyn Center residents who are facing the unexpected financial burden of a needed exterior private utility repair; and WHEREAS, the City has provided funds to the homeowner to complete a private exterior repair; and WHEREAS, the homeowner has agreed, as part of the assessment agreement, to the assessment and to waive any and all procedural and substantive objections to the improvement and assessment, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the property; and WHEREAS, a special assessment roll, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk, tabulating those properties where a private utility repair cost is to be assessed with the amount, including interest and service charges if applicable, to be assessed, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that: 1. The special assessment roll of emergency private utility repairs is hereby adopted and certified as Assessment Roll No. 26008. 2. The special assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable with ad valorem taxes levied in 2026, in five installments with interest thereon at seven (7.0) percent per annum. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the certification of the assessments to the Hennepin County Auditor pay the entire assessment to the City, without interest. Such payments must be made by the close of business on November 21, 2025 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the Hennepin County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. a Page 221 of 269 RESOLUTION NO. _______________ October 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 222 of 269 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. _______________ RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DELINQUENT PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICE ACCOUNTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, the records of the Utility Billing Division list certain accounts as delinquent as of July 31, 2025; and WHEREAS, the owners of the properties served by each delinquent account have been notified of the delinquency according to legal requirements; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 444.075 and City Ordinances, Sections 4-105 and 4-201 authorize certification of such delinquent accounts to the County property tax rolls for collection; and WHEREAS, a special assessment roll, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk, tabulating those properties where a delinquent public utility account is to be assessed with the amount and service charges to be assessed; and WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessments for delinquent utility service accounts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The special assessment roll of delinquent public utility accounts is hereby adopted and certified as Assessment Roll No. 26007. 2. The special assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable with ad valorem taxes levied in 2026, in one installment with interest thereon at seven percent (7.0%) per annum, and shall bear interest on the entire assessment from December 1, 2025 through December 31, 2026. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the certification of the assessments to the Hennepin County Auditor pay the entire assessment to the City, without interest, if the entire assessment is paid on or before November 21, 2025. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the Hennepin County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, Page 223 of 269 RESOLUTION NO. _______________ and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. October 13, 2025 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 224 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk THROUGH: Daren Nyquist, Deputy City Manager BY: Shannon Pettit, City Clerk SUBJECT: On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Application for WK Brown, LLC, Wayne Brown, Palm Grove Event Center, 2590 Freeway Blvd Requested Council Action: Staff is seeking city council consideration of an application for On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License pursuant to Chapter 11 Sections 11-115 and Sections 11-122 of the Brooklyn Center City Code. Motion options: - Motion to approve On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License as presented; - Motion to approve On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License with conditions; and - Motion to deny On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License. Background: The owner of Palm Grove Event Center applied for an On-sale Intoxicating Liquor License on September 4, 2025. This establishment previously held an On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, which lapsed on December 31, 2024. City staff reviewed the liquor license application and noted that the application was incomplete. The owner has since submitted the required documentation. However, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 340A.404 and Section 11-107(4) of the City Code, the City may issue an On-Sale Liquor License to 5 different types of establishments: (1) Restaurants “with a dining room that is open to the general public, with seating for not less than 30 guests at one time;” (2) Hotels with a dining room; (3) a Club; (4) a Business Establishment that conducts culinary or cooking classes; or (5) the Heritage Center. The applicant reports to the city that he has an onsite restaurant at his event center. Section 11-103 defines Restaurant as: “an eating facility, other than a Hotel, under the control of a single proprietor or manager, where meals are regularly prepared on the Premises, where full waitress/waiter table service is provided, where a customer orders food from printed menus where the main food course is served and consumed while seated at a single location and that has at least 30% of its applicable revenue derived from the serving of food for consumption on the Premises.” City staff has asked the applicant multiple times about the status of the onsite restaurant. A preliminary investigation showed that the restaurant was closed. The Page 225 of 269 applicant verbally confirmed that the restaurant was open. However, city staff conducted an audit of the restaurant which showed the restaurant was open one out of 6 days. On October 7, the applicant verbally stated that the restaurant would be open full-time beginning on Wednesday, October 8. Two visual audits were done during the day of Wednesday, October 8th which showed that the restaurant was closed. A final audit on the evening of October 8 indicated the restaurant was closed. City staff concluded that the restaurant was closed on October 8th, contrary to what the applicant reported to the city. To date, the applicant has not shown that there is or will be an operational onsite restaurant which is required to hold an On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License in the City of Brooklyn Center. Budget Issues: Inclusive Community Engagement: Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: None Page 226 of 269 Council Regular Meeting DATE: 10/13/2025 TO: City Council FROM: Xiong Thao, Housing and Community Standards Manager THROUGH: Jesse Anderson, Community Development Director BY: Xiong Thao, Housing and Community Standards Manager SUBJECT: Repeal Of Chapter 12-310 - Premises Identification Requested Council Action: - Motion to approve an ordinance repealing section 12-310 of the Brooklyn Center City code regarding commercial premises Identification (First reading) Background: During the July 14, 2025 City Council work session, it was a majority of the City Council who requested to stop enforcement of 12-310 Premises Identification ordinance until a further discussion with City Council in the future. At the August 11, 2025 City Council meeting, staff presented information about the ordinance and enforcement data. Staff presented four options for consideration. • Option 1: Remove the requirement for address numbers. This would eliminate the current amended ordinance changes. There are no standards in the building code, however, fire codes require 4" numbers similar to residential requirements. • Option 2: Require 6-inch numbers. This is a slightly larger size than what's required for single-family homes and is a common size available at most hardware stores. • Option 3: Standardize all numbers to 12 inches. This would eliminate the larger size requirements for multi-story buildings (currently 18 inches for two stories and 24 inches for three or more stories). 12 inch numbers are also more readily available online and in-stores. • Option 4: No changes to the current ordinance. Staff would then restart enforcement. The majority of City Council recommended staff move forward with Option 1, to remove the requirement for larger commercial addressing. This would revert back to building code addressing requirements. Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Inclusive Community Engagement: Page 227 of 269 Antiracist/Equity Policy Effect: Strategic Priorities and Values: ATTACHMENTS: 1. CC Memo Premises Identification 8.11.25 CC Meeeting 2. CC Memo Premises Identification 9.23.24 CC Meeeting 3. DOCSOPEN-#1049355-v1-Section_12-310_Ordinance_Repeal (003) Page 228 of 269 Page 229 of 269 Page 230 of 269 Page 231 of 269 Page 232 of 269 Page 233 of 269 Page 234 of 269 Page 235 of 269 Page 236 of 269 Page 237 of 269 Page 238 of 269 Page 239 of 269 Page 240 of 269 Page 241 of 269 Page 242 of 269 Page 243 of 269 Page 244 of 269 Page 245 of 269 Page 246 of 269 Page 247 of 269 Page 248 of 269 Page 249 of 269 Page 250 of 269 Page 251 of 269 Page 252 of 269 Page 253 of 269 Page 254 of 269 Page 255 of 269 Page 256 of 269 Page 257 of 269 Page 258 of 269 Page 259 of 269 Page 260 of 269 Page 261 of 269 Page 262 of 269 Page 263 of 269 Page 264 of 269 Page 265 of 269 Page 266 of 269 Page 267 of 269 1 BR291-16-1049355.v1 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 10th, day of November, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an ordinance repealing Section 12-310 Regarding Commercial Premises Identification Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the City Clerk at 763-569-3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE 2025-___ AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SEC. 12-310 OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER CITY CODE REGARDING COMMERCIAL PREMISES IDENTIFICATION The City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center does ordain as follows: Article I. Brooklyn Center City Code, Chapter 12 is amended as follows: Section 12-310 of Chapter 12 Building Maintenance and Occupancy is hereby repealed in its entirety. Article 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force after its passage and publication in accordance with Section 3.09 of the City Charter and applicable State law. Passed and adopted this ___ day of ____, 2025, by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center Date April Graves, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________ Shannon Petit, City Clerk First Reading: , 2025 Page 268 of 269 2 Second Reading: , 2025 Publication Date: , 2025 Effective Date: , 2025 Page 269 of 269