HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993 07-12 EDAM Special Session MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN
CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE
OF MINNESOTA
SPECIAL SESSION
JULY 12, 1993
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority met in special session and was
called to order by President Todd Paulson at 9:17 p.m.
ROLL CALL
President Todd Paulson, Commissioners Celia Scott, Dave Rosene, Barb Kalligher, and
Kristen Mann. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Community Development
Specialist Tom Bublitz, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Council Secretary Carla Wirth.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
JUNE 21. 1993 SPECIAL SESSION
There was a motion by Commissioner Rosene and seconded by Commissioner Scott to
approve the minutes of the June 21, 1993, EDA meeting as printed. The motion passed
unanimously with Commissioners Kalligher and Mann abstaining.
JUNE 28. 1993 SPECIAL SESSION
There was a motion by Commissioner Scott and seconded by Commissioner Rosene to
approve the minutes of the June 28, 1993, EDA meeting as printed. The motion passed
unanimously.
RESOLUTIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 93 -27
Commissioner Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING ONE (1) BROOKLYN CENTER ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GRANT (FILE NO. II -113 [80391)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Commissioner Dave Rosene, and the motion passed unanimously.
7/12/93 1
DISCUSSION ITEM
HOUSING COMMISSION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON HOME
REHABILITATION DEFERRED LOAN PROGRAM
The C6mmunity Development Specialist reported the Housing Commission discussed three
issues raised by the EDA at its April 12, 1993, meeting. He explained the first issue was
whether more than one grant should be issued to a particular property. He continued
presently there is no prohibition against awarding a second grant to a property providing five
years has expired between grant awards. He stated Brooklyn Center is part of the Urban
Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, and Hennepin
County guidelines governing the administration of the deferred loan program do not prohibit
the award of second or even more deferred loans as long as five years has expired between
the first and second deferred loans.
The Community Development Specialist noted of the last 36 deferred loans awarded from
1990 to present, eight were second deferred loans and six of the eight recipients were senior
citizens. He added there are currently 70 applicants on a waiting list for the deferred loan
program, three of which have previously received deferred loans from the City's program.
He reported the Housing Commission recommends no second deferred loans be awarded
until there are no applicants on the waiting list and exceptions be made only in extraordinary
circumstances related to health and safety concerns or as determined by the program
administrator.
With regard to the second issue under consideration, the Community Development Specialist
stated the Housing Commission discussed the value of the property being improved and
whether it was economically prudent to award grants to properties with a low market value.
He explained the Hennepin County CDBG program guidelines specify "the structure will
have remaining useful life such that the total amount of the repairs required to bring the
house up to Section 8 quality standards may be amortized over such life in an economically
prudent manner. Generally, the total amount of the required repairs should not exceed 50%
of the market value of the property, as indicted in the property tax statement."
The Community Development Specialist reported staff recommends a minimum value
requirement not be established for homes served by the CDBG program. He stated staff
recommends they prepare a cost repair estimate on homes valued at $55,000 or less (as
determined by the City Assessor) to determine if the property can be brought up to Section
8 standards with funds available.
The Community Development Specialist stated the third issue addressed was the types of
improvements and priorities given to improvements such as exterior versus interior
improvements. He reported Hennepin County and federal guidelines for this program
require the property receiving the deferred loan must be rehabilitated to Section 8 standards
to create a safe, healthy, and sanitary living environment. He noted these types of
improvements do not directly address aesthetics or appearance issues. He explained staff
believes the hierarchy of inspections for health and safety and energy improvements is
necessary to comply with the intent of the CDBG program. He added staff can make an
effort to dedicate a portion of the deferred loan to exterior improvements whenever
7/12/93 -2-
practical and /or the City could consider a separate allocation of EDA/City funds in addition
to CDBG funds which could be dedicated to exterior improvements only.
The Community Development Specialist stated HUD annually revises the program income
limits for the CDBG program, which the Housing Commission recommends be adopted by
the City. He further stated they will also consider whether the City's program should be a
true loan program rather than a deferred loan or grant program. He explained having a
grant program would allow the money to be paid back and reused for another applicant.
Commissioner Scott asked if the money received from loans could be used for aesthetic
improvements. The Community Development Specialist stated the money would still be
restricted since there is not much flexibility when federal dollars are involved. Commissioner
Scott pointed out that making more money available through a loan program would result
in more crucial improvements being made. Because of this, she thought the waiting list
would be reduced and potential for allowing exterior improvements increased. She added
siding also provides insulation for the home.
The Community Development Specialist reported Hennepin County is currently in the
process of reviewing their guidelines and these guidelines are more flexible than HUD
regulations. Commissioner Kalligher asked if the City can provide input to HUD and
Hennepin County.
President Paulson agreed with Commissioner Kalligher's suggestion and asked staff if they
could approach Hennepin County and ask them to include exterior improvements. He
agreed health safety issues were good public policy but thought exterior improvements visible
to the community were also good policy.
The City Manager suggested staff approach Hennepin County and HUD with this request
and ask for a response.
There was a motion by Commissioner Scott and seconded by Commissioner Mann to
approve the revised HUD program income limits for the CDBG program as presented in
the staff report, and accept the Housing Commission's three recommendations as presented.
The motion passed unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Commissioner Kalligher and seconded by Commissioner Scott to
adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center Economic
Development Authority adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
Todd Paulson, President
Recorded and transcribed by:
Carla Wirth
Timesaver Off Site Secretarial
7/12/93 3