HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007 05-14 CCP Regular Session CITY COUNCIL MEETING
City of Brooklyn Center
May 14, 2007 AGENDA
l. Informal Open Forum With City Council 6:45 p.m.
provides an opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the
agenda. Open Forum will be limited to 15 minutes, it is not televised, and it may not be used
to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political endorsements, or
for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with
citizens. Questions from the Council will be for clarification only. Open Forum will not be
used as a time for problem solving or reacting to the comments made but, rather, for hearing
the citizen for informational purposes only.
2. Invocation 7 p.m.
3. Call to Order Regular Business Meeting
—The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting.
A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is
located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary.
4. Roll Call
5. Pledge of Allegiance
6. Council Report
7. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda
—The following items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by
one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so
requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at
the end of Council Consideration Items.
a. Approval of Minutes
1. Apri123, 2007 Joint Meeting with Charter Commission
2. Apri123, 2007 Regular Session
3. Apri123, 2007 Work Session
4. Apri130, 2007 Joint Meeting with Brooklyn Park City Council
5. April 30, 2007 Board of Appeal and Equalization
b. Licenses
c. Resolution Accepting Work Performed and Authorizing Final Payment,
Improvement Project Nos. 2006-01, 02, 03, 04, Contract 2006-A, Centerbrook
Neighborhood Street, Storm Drainage and Utility Improvements
d. Resolution Accepting Quotation and Awarding a Contract, Improvement Project No.
2007-13, Contract 2007-C, Reforestation of 2006 Street Improvement Project Areas
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- May 14, 2007
8. Presentations/Proclamations
None.
9. Public Hearing
None.
10. Planning Commission Items
a. Planning Commission Application No. 2007-008 Submitted by Seth Oliver. Request
for a Planned Unit Development Amendment and Development Plan approval of the
first phase of a two building hotel complex consisting of an eight story, 175 room
hotel, 100 seat restaurant and an enclosed connection to the Earle Brown Heritage
Center. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this application at its
April 26, 2007, meeting.
1. Resolution Regarding the Disposition of Planning Commission Application
No. 2007-008 submitted by Seth Oliver.
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
b. Planning Commission Application No. 2007-009 Submitted by Brooklyn Center
Church of the Nazarene. Request for a Special Use Permit and Site and Building
Plan Approval for a three phase church addition and parking lot expansion at 501
73rd Avenue North. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this
application at their Apri126, 2007, meeting.
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to approve Planning Commission Application No. 2007-009 subject
to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission.
11. Council Consideration Items
a. Resolution Accepting Quotation and Awarding a Contract, Improvement Project No.
2007-16, Contract 2007-E, 2007 Diseased Tree Removal
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
b. Resolution Accepting Bid and Awarding a Contract, Improvement Project Nos.
2007-01, 02, 03, and 04, Contract 2007-A, Freeway Boulevard and Shingle Creek
Parkway Street, Storm Drainage and Utility Improvements
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
c. Resolution Establishing Improvement Project Nos. 2008-01, 02, 03, and 04, Contract
2008-A, Maranatha Area Neighborhood Street, Storm Drainage and Utility
Improvements
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- May 14, 2007
d. Resolution Authorizing the Acquisition of Easement along Willow Lane North
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
e. Resolution Rescinding Assessment of Unpaid Utilities to 5903 Emerson Avenue
North
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
f. Resolution Amending 2007 budgets for Central Garage Fund and Liquor Store 1 to
Enable Purchase of a Cargo Van
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
g. Resolution Authorizing Settlements with the Metropolita.n Council Environmental
Services (MCES) Division and Metro Transit Division of the Metropolitan Council
for Sanitary Sewer Services Rendered
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
h. Resolution Amending the City Council Code of Policies; Section 2.32 Water Utility
Meter Reading Policy and Amending the Fees for Delinquent Meter Readings
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
i. Charter Commission Recommendations Regarding Sections 3.11 and 4.04 of the City
Charter
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to consider Charter Commission recommendations and direct City
staff to prepare Ordinance amendment.
j. Resolution Authorizing the City Manager of Brooklyn Center to Enter into a Joint
Agreement with the City of Brooklyn Park and Police Executive Research Forum to
Conduct a Study on Violent Crime to Deliver a Comprehensive Crime-Reduction
Strategy for Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
12. Adjournment
Mayor's Activities Apri124 May 14 2007
Renort to the Brooklvn Center Citv Council Mav 14. 2007
1. 4/24/07 A welcome address to the Northwest Hennepin Family Services Collaboration,
the Northwest Teen Parent Connection Planning Commission at the Brooklyn Center
Willow Lane School
2. 4/26/07 Visited the Northport Schoo150 Anniversary Celebration at the Brooklyn
Center North Port School.
3. 4/29/07 Attended the Lions Pancake breakfast fundraiser at the Brooklyn Center High
School
4. 4/30/07 A welcome address to the Central Weights and Measures Convention
representing 12 Mid-west states including Minnesota at the Brooklyn Center Crown Plaza
Hotel
5. 4/30/07 Interview at City Hall with KSTP Channel 5, A promotional for our Earl
Brown Days June 21 St June 23 beginning June 21 St with the Earl Brown Days Parade.
6. 5/4-5/07 Minnesota Mayors Association Conference at the Holiday Inn Willmar hosted
by the City of Benson.
7. 5/6/07 An address to the 20 Year Pastor's Celebration Serviee at the Brooklyn Center
Unity Temple Church of Christ. Chief Bechtold, Chief Bowman and Council Member
Yelich also attended.
8. 5/9/07 Presented the Brooklyn Center Riverwood Neighborhood Association at a
luncheon at the Fish Lake Pavilion given by the North Hennepin Human Services
Council which awarded their Invest Northwest Award to the Riverwood Neighborhood
Association.
9. Sf 10/07 Attended the CEAP Taste of the Northwest fundraiser at the Brooklyn Park
Grand Rios Hotel
10. 5/12/07 A welcome address and presented a Mayor's Proclamation to the 29 Annual
Prayer Breakfast "Living by Faith" breakfast at the Brooklyn Center Earl Brown Heritage
Center.
Respectively Submitted,
Mayor Tim Willson
t
v,r z:z
r<
.ti f
5
x i
�a
s
r
28
.c
3
l
'i
.:i
Y
4 S
,i
s.;
�4
i s
..s
t
a':. j
Y
4
1.
+qM1 f+
u�
r•::: e
y
z.
I
e
...�r.�.
I
y'.
�'i x:
.s: h
f
r
...i:... :i
n .r
?n
..i�
i�
'i
.i "'r
i
r
H
'y
r
r
e ..i.
.i
.�.e.;.
i� 5 .'J
�..n.
i`y i
n 4.�
v
�i h<� ..F
.i
v.
v
a
r..�r.`
r'...'
i
.:5v
.n
2
i
v`^_�. .v..;
J
y
3 :.i.
i. w
e z„'
s:
u;
3
.n
,'si� Y
r i: a. .t:
r
...i:
n Y
i
y I
t��
,r.
i:
,a
-r :.t ',c
..a
a
.r.
e
v.
v:
v...
Office of the City Clerk
City of Brooklyn Cente�
A Millennium Community
MEMORANDUM
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk S��I�,�1f����1A�U��
DATE: May 14, 2007
SUBJECT: COLTNCILMEMBER LASMAN: Requested Change to Minutes
I
Councilmember Lasman requested the following change to the Regular minutes of April 23,
2007:
Pa�e 2
Councilmember Lasman reported attending the North Metro Mayors Association Board of
Directors meeting hosted by Brooklyn Center on April 11, 2007, where reports were given by
Senator Pogemiller and Representative Hortman on transportation issues. She reported attending
a Seminar Committee meeting hosted by North Memorial Trauma Center on underage alcohol
abuse. She further reported attending the Crime Prevention Program meeting to discuss the
upcoming golf tournament fundraiser on Mav 18, 2007, along with the Annual Crime
Prevention Program Police Citizens Awards Ceremony where inspiring stories were told and
50 awards were presented. She also reported attending the Great Shingle Creek Cleanup on April
21, 2007, where she participated in cleaning up the trail system.
Councilmember Lasman requested the following change to the Joint Meeting with Brooklyn
Park minutes of April 30, 2007:
Pa�e 2
It was the majority consensus of both City Councils to continue to study the options
for Highway 252.
(c*r indicates matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.)
I
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone TDD Number
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400
City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434
FAX (763) 569-3494
w w w. cityo f b rooklyncenter. org
I
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
1N THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY COUNCIL/CHARTER COMMISSION JOINT MEETING
APRIL 23, 2007
COUNCIL/COMMISSION CONFERENCE ROOM
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Work Session with the Charter Commission at City
Hall and was called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Mary O'Connor, Dan Ryan, and Mark
Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, and Deputy City Clerk Camille Worley.
Charter Commission Members present were Commissioners Stanley Leino, Bruce Lund, Edward
Nelson, Mary Nierengarten, Eileen Oslund, and Richard Phillips.
DISCUSSION OF CHARTER COMNIISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
There was discussion on the proposed Charter changes to Sections 3.11 and 4.04. It was
indicated that the Charter Commission felt the changes to Section 4.04 were necessary to help
cover administrative costs associated with candidate filing. It was also indicated that the change
will modernize the section along with requiring potential candidates to apply more fore-thought
to their candidacy. It was explained that "Minnesota" should be removed from "Minnesota
Affidavit of Candidacy" because the form used is "Affidavit of Candidacy" and a specific form
to Minnesota does not exist. There was concern expressed that the proposed language would
make charges for copies of Ordinances mandatory rather than discretionary. It was stated that
the City Code of Ordinances is available on the City's website.
There was discussion on the process of Charter amendments in previous years.
Charter Commission Chair Stanley Leino indicated that a recommendation would be forwarded
to the City Council following further discussion on the two sections at the April 25, 2007,
Charter Commission meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded adjournment of the City
Council meeting at 6:44 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
04/23/07 1 DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 1N THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
APRIL 23, 2007
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor Tim
Willson at 6:45 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Mary O'Connor, Dan Ryan, and Mark
Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Public Works Director/City Engineer Todd
Blomstrom, Community Development Director Brad Hoffman, Planning and Zoning Specialist Ron
Warren, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Deputy City Clerk Camille Worley.
Mayor Willson opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum.
Kris Lawrence-Anderson, 5213 Eleanor Lane, stated the rental Ordinance needs to be applied to all
units under five and stated the Ordinance is of the highest priority to her.
Philip Berglin, 601 Bellvue Lane, Financial Commissioner applicant, introduced himself and stated
he looks forward to working with the City.
Karen Bennett, 4008 71 St Ave N, stated she installed a fence on her property to keep her neighbors
out of her yard. She stated the neighbors are coming through the fence, to retrieve balls, leaving the
gate open. She expressed frustration and indicated that she spoke to the Police Department regarding
the matter.
Tracy Blaisdell, 4001 71 Ave N, stated concern with the incorrect placement of a stop sign and
speeding vehicles in her neighborhood. She indicated that two houses in her neighborhood have not
been maintaining properly, creating an eye-sore. She stated she has not contacted the Police
Department regarding the speeding vehicles because many of thern are from the house in which Ms.
Bennett stated concern.
John Peterson, 5212 64�' Ave N, stated the rental Ordinance is lacking regarding single family
housing and he would like to see resolution to the matter made a priority.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember O'Connor seconded to close the Informal Open
Forum at 6:58p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
04/23/07 -1- DRAFT
2. INVOCATION
Councilmember O'Connor offered a moment of silence as the Invocation.
3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at
7:00 p.m.
4. ROLL CALL
Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Mary O'Connor, Dan Ryan, and Mark
Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Public Works Director/City Engineer Todd
Blomstrom, CommuniTy Development Director Brad Hoffinan, Planning and Zoning Specialist Ron
Warren, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Deputy City Clerk Camille Worley.
5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
6. COUNCIL REPORT
Councilmember Ryan reported attending the Housing Commission meeting on April 17, 2007,
where the Point-of-Sale Ordinance was discussed. He reported attending the Annual Crime
Prevention Program Police Citizens Awards Ceremony on April 18, 2007, sponsored by the
Brooklyn Center Police Department and the Crime Prevention Program. He also reported
participating in a ride-along on April 20, 2007, in two patrol cars where he was able to observe
Police Officers in their normal duties. He stated he is impressed with the dedication and
professionalism of the Brooklyn Center Police Officers.
Councilmember Lasman reported attending the North Metro Mayors Association Board of Directors
meeting hosted by Brooklyn Center on April 11, 2007, where reports were given by Senator
Pogemiller and Representative Hortman on transportation issues. She reported attending a Seminar
Committee meeting hosted by North Memorial Trauma Center on underage alcohol abuse. She
further reported attending the Crime Prevention Program meeting to discuss the upcoming golf
tournament fundraiser on April 18, 2007, along with the Annual Crime Prevention Program Police
Citizens Awards Ceremony where inspiring stories were told and 50 awards were presented. She
also reported attending the Great Shingle Creek Cleanup on April 21, 2007, where she participated
in cleaning up the trail system.
Councilmember Yelich reported attending a seminar on Comprehensive Planning on April 18, 2007.
He extended a compliment to all residents who participated in the Shingle Creek Cleanup.
Councilmember O'Connor reported attending the Park and Recreation Commission meeting and
stated parks throughout the City will be visited during the next two meetings. She stated she
informed the Commission of the road reconfiguration at Bass Lake Road between Brooklyn
Boulevard and Hwy 81 where a Commissioner expressed concern of left turns in the middle lane,
which was a problem years ago. She further reported attending the Annual Crime Prevention
Program Police Citizens Awards Ceremony where she was pleased to learn about the new
04/23/07 -2- DRAFT
leadership award for children in honor of the Citgo gas station employee who was killed while
assisting a customer.
Mayor Willson reported attending the North Metro Mayors Association Board meeting on April 11,
2007. He re
ported attendin the Annual Crime Prevention Pro ram Police Citizens Awards
g g
Ceremony on April 18, 2007. He reported joining the Riverwood Neighborhood Association for a
neighborhood cleanup on Hwy 252. He further reported attending the National Youth Service
Learning Day at Garden City Elementary where 20 students from East and West African countries
put together a ceremony and peace book that they are soliciting funds for, with proceeds going to
charity.
I 7. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Lasman requested the following change to the Work Session minutes of
April 9, 2007:
Mr. Boganey distributed an update on the 57�' and Logan Development Agreement and discussed the
information presented. He illustrated that a larger plume of vapors have been found than expected.
He discussed the findings of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). He stated the City is
working with the County who has indicated more testing is needed. He stated after testing, it may be
I justified to enter the homes and implement a venting system. He stated Steiner Development would
like to proceed with the commercial aspect of their development, holding off on the residential
aspect. He discussed the options to be considered by the City CounciL
Councilmember O'Connor requested the following change to the Work Session minutes of
Apri19, 2007:
Pa�e 1
Councilmember O Connor asked if the house would be shut down if the water was to be turned off.
Mr. Boganev resnonded that he did not know.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember O'Connor seconded to approve the Agenda
and Consent Agenda, with amendments to the April 9, 2007 Work Session minutes, and the
following consent items were approved:
7a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Apri19, 2007 Study Session
2. Apri19, 2007 Regular Session
3. April 9, 2007 Work Session
4. April 16, 2007 I-694/94 Redevelopment Work Session
7b. LICENSES
MECHANICAL
Allan Mechanical, Inc. 7875 Fuller Road, Eden Prairie
CenterPoint Energy 9320 Evergreen Blvd NW, Suite B, Coon Rapids
Custom Mechanical Inc 14081 94�' Ave N, Maple Grove
Kumar Mechanical, Inc. 877 SW 3 Street, New Brighton
04/23/07 -3- DRAFT
Louis Degidio, Inc. 21033 Heron Way, Lakeville
MOTOR VEHICLE DEALERSHIP
Luther Brookdale Chevrolet 6701 Brooklyn Blvd
Luther Brookdale Chrysler Jeep Dodge 6121 Brooklyn Blvd
Brooklyn Center Motors, LLC 6800 Brooklyn Blvd
7c. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-61 DESIGNATING 2007 PLANTING LIST OF
ALLOWABLE BOULEVARD TREE SPECIES
Motion passed unanimously.
8. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
8a. TREE CITY USA
1. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-62 RECOGNIZING THE DESIGNATION OF
BROOKLYN CENTER AS A TREE CITY USA FOR THE FIFTEENTH
CONSECUTIVE YEAR
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO.
2007-62 Recognizing the Designation of Brooklyn Center as a Tree City USA for the Fifteenth
Consecutive Year.
Motion passed unanimously.
2. PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 27, 2007 ARBOR DAY AND MAY
2007 ARBOR MONTH IN BROOKLYN CENTER
Mr. Boganey explained that the City of Brooklyn Center forestry program includes an Arbor Day
and Month program which travels between elementary schools in Brooklyn Center, providing
teaching resources, learning activities, and an Arbor Day event to plant one or more trees. He stated
the students at Odyssey Charter School will participate in the 2007 Arbor Month celebration at
Kylawn Park on May 10, 2007, at 1:00 p.m. He stated the $200 monetary contribution from the
Sons of the American Legion will be dedicated to this event.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to adopt a Proclamation
Declaring April 27, 2007 Arbor Day and May 2007 Arbor Month in Brooklyn Center.
Motion passed unanimously.
9. PUBLIC HEARING
There was not a Public Hearing scheduled for this meeting.
10. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
10a. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2007-005 SUBMITTED BY
MANLEY COMMERCIAL, INC. REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPROVAL TO COMBINE AND REDIVIDE THREE LOTS AND SURPLUS
04/23/07 -4- DRAFT
RIGHT OF WAY INTO THREE NEW LOTS AND A COMMON AREA FOR A
DEVELOPMENT UNDER A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD).
Mr. Boganey introduced the item and sta.ted the Planning Commission recommended approval at its
April 12, 2007, meeting.
Planning and Zoning Specialist Ron Warren explained that the City is not involved in the acquisition
of the house located at 419 67�' Avenue North. He stated Manley Commercial has the option to buy
the property, pending the approval of this application.
Janelle Frechette, 6630 Camden Drive, distributed a letter to the City Council outlining her concerns
regarding landscaping, tree preservation, waste disposal, and traffic.
Mr. Warren stated the proposed plan is a modified plan in response to concerns expressed at the
Planning Commission meeting. He stated the applicant has agreed to consider retaining as much of
the landscaping on the west side of the property as they can. He explained that the applicant intends
to clear a portion of the landscaping due to grading; however he stated a 35-foot buffer would
remain. He stated additional landscaping has been added around the dumpster to enhance screening
of the waste receptacles. He discussed the traffic light on 66�' and Camden Avenues along with
access points of the townhome development.
There was a discussion on the hours of operation for the commercial uses.
Cindy Weber, Manley Commercial, Inc., stated the owners of the property located at 419 67�'
Avenue North are willing sellers. She stated a strong interest for a drive-through coffee shop,
however explained that restrictions to the hours of operation may prohibit such use. She discussed
other possible tenants such as a hair salon, dry cleaner, tax office, and restaurant.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded approval of Planning
Commission Application No. 2007-005 subject to the following conditions recommended by the
Planning Commission:
1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.
2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances.
3. Approval of this preliminary plat is contingent upon approval of Planning Commission
i Application No. 2007-006.
4. The owner association documents and declarations shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Attorney and filed with the final plat.
5. All easements necessary to provide utility service to the proposed site development shall be
dedicated to the public for public use, as approved by the City Engineer, prior to fmal plat
approval.
6. Water and sanitary sewer services to the existing home at 419 67�` Avenue North shall be
disconnected at the mains prior to building removal or demolition. Service disconnections shall
be done in conformance with sewer and water service disconnection specifications available at
the City Engineering department office.
04/23/07 -5- DRAFT
7. The home and accessory building at 419 67�' Avenue North shall be demolished and/or removed
from the property prior to the filing of the plat with Hennepin County or the execution of an
agreement to assure such removal.
r�
8. No vehicle access to the ro osed site shall be ained from an here alon 67 Avenue North.
P p g Y�' g
9. Building permits for construction of any building comprehended under Planning Commission
Application No. 2007-006 shall not be issued until the final plat has been approved by the City
Council and filed with Hennepin County.
10. All necessary easement and right of way vacations shall be accomplished by ordinance
amendment and formally requested by the applicant prior to final plat approval.
cn
11. The access a reement antin access to this site from 66 Avenue North shall be re-reviewed
g
g
by the City Attorney for appropriateness prior to final plat approval.
Motion passed unanimously.
lOb. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2007-006 SUBMITTED BY
MANLEY COMMERCIAL, INC. REQUEST FOR REZONING FROM C-2
(COMMERCE), R-3 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TOWNHOUSES) AND R-
1 (ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE) TO PUD/C-2 (PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT/COMMERCE) AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL
THROUGH THE PUD PROCESS OF A THREE BUILDING, 25,500 SQ. FT.
COMMERCIAL RETAIL/SERVICE CENTER.
1. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-63 REGARDING THE DISPOSITION OF
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2007-006 SUBMITTED BY
MANLEY COMMERCIAL, INC.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember R an seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO.
Y
2007-63 Regarding the Disposition of Planning Commission Application No. 2007-006 Submitted
by Manley Commercial, Inc.
Motion passed unanimously.
2. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES
REGARDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LAND
(NORTHWEST OF T.H. 252 AND 66 AVENUE NORTI�
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to approve first reading and set
second reading and Public Hearing for May 14, 2007.
Motion passed unanimously.
lOc. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2007-007 SUBMITTED BY
GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION INYESTMENT CO., INC: REQUEST FOR
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE THE PROPOSED
TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT AT 4821 TWIN LAKE AVENUE INTO TWO
LOTS AND A COMMON AREA.
04/23/07 -6- DRAFT
Mr. Boganey introduced the item and stated the Planning Cornmission recommended approval at its
April 12, 2007, meeting.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember O'Connor seconded approval of Planning
Commission Application No. 2007-007 subject to the following conditions recommended by the
Planning Commission:
1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.
2. The final plat is subject to the provisions to Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances.
3. A declaration of covenants and restrictions along with home owner association documents shall
be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to final plan approval.
4. The Outlot designation shall not be used for the common area lot. The final plat shall be
modified accordingly.
Motion passed unanimously.
11. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS
lla. MAYORAL APPOINTMENT FINANCIAL COMMISSION MEMBER
Councilmember O'Connor moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to ratify Mayoral
appointments of Philip Berglin, 601 Bellvue Lane and Jessica Roerick, 6119 Emerson Avenue, to
the Financial Commission.
Motion passed unanimously.
llb. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-64 AMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL CODE OF
POLICIES; SECTION 1.6 TO GUIDE CITY STAFF ON HOW TO INCORPORATE
COUNCIL MEMBER INITIATED ITEMS INTO THE WORK SESSION AGENDA
IN AN ORDERLY AND EQUITABLE MANNER
Mr. Boganey introduced the item and stated the purpose of the proposed resolution.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO.
2007-64 Amending the City Council Code of Policies; Section 1.6 to Guide City Staff on How to
Incorporate Council Member Initiated Items into the Work Session Agenda in an Orderly and
Equitable Manner.
Motion passed unanimously.
11c. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-65 APPROVING AN APPLICATION TO THE HENNEPIN
COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND
Mr. Boganey introduced the item and discussed the pending situation with the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency and stated the purpose of the proposed resolution.
04/23/07 -7- DRAFT
Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO.
2007-65 Approving an Application to the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund.
Motion passed unanimously.
lld. ORDINANCE NO. 2007-04 VACATING AN EASEMENT WITHIN PORTIONS OF
LOT 4 AND LOT 5, BLOCK 5, LAKEBREEZE ADDITION, 4821 TWIN LAKE
AVENUE NORTH
Mr. Boganey stated the item was first read on February 26, 2007; and a Public Hearing was held on
March 26, 2007, at which time the Ordinance was tabled to allow staff and the applicant to execute
the replacement easement.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO.
2007-04 Vacating an Easement Within Portions of Lot 4 and Lot 5, Block 5, Lakebreeze Addition,
4821 Twin Lake Avenue North, subject to receiving an executed copy of a replacement easement for
the property.
Motion passed unanimously.
lle. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-66 ESTABLISHING CITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NO. 2007-17, KYLAWN PARK IMPROVEMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Mr. Boganey introduced the item and stated the purpose of the proposed resolution. He stated to his
knowledge, the Park and Recreation Commission has not identified any use for the property. He
stated the tennis courts are in a condition that warrants removal.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO.
2007-66 Establishing City Improvement Project No. 2007-17, Kylawn Park Improvements, and
Authorizing a Professional Services Agreement.
Motion passed unanimously.
llf. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-67 GRANTING CORPORATE AUTHORITY FOR
TRANSACTION OF FINANCIAL BUSINESS MATTERS
Mr. Boganey introduced the item and stated the purpose of the proposed resolution.
Councilmember Yelich moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO.
2007-67 Granting Corporate Authority for Transaction of Financial Business Matters.
Motion passed unanimously.
12. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Willson moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded adjournment of the City Council
meeting at 8:10 p.m. in recognition of and respect for the life and contributions of Theodore Kauth.
Motion passed unanimously.
04/23/07 -8- DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
WORK SESSION
APRIL 23, 2007
CITY HALL COUNCIL C��AMBERS
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City CouncilBconomic Development Authority (EDA) met in Work Session called to
order by Mayor/President Tim Willson at 8:19 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor/President Tim Willson and Councilmembers/Commissioners Kay Lasman, Mary O'Connor, Dan
Ryan, and Mark Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Public Works Director/City
Engineer Todd Blomstrom, CARS Director Jim Glasoe, and Deputy City Clerk Camille Worley.
RECESS
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to recess the Work Session
at 8:20 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
RECONVENE WORK SESSION
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to reconvene the Work Session
at 8:27 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
FOLLOW-UP TO WATERSHED DISCUSSION
Commissioner Carmody stated a letter from the City directed to the Watershed Commission expressing the
City Council's opinion would be appropriate. She stated the 25% funding from a Hennepin County ad
valorem tax levy and the remaining 75% funding from "contributing/benefiting" cities is appropriate. She
stated she feels that it would also be appropriate for the City Council to endorse the following paragraph:
The Commission should consider development of some basic standards for the formal review
process by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), such as preparation of an engineering report
describing the proposed project, requiring that the TAC provide a formal written recommendation to
the Commission regarding proposed capital projects, and that the TAC recommendations are based
on a formal vote by the appointed TAC member from each member city.
04/23/07 -1- DRAFT
Commissioner Carmody stated the vote will be taken on Thursday, May 10, 2007, and she would like it to
be discussed by the Watershed Commission prior to the vote. She stated a letter from the City stating the
consensus of the City Council would be appropriate.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to express concurrence with Commissioner Carmody in
that 25% funding from a Hennepin County ad valorem tax levy and the remaining 75% funding from
"contributing/benefiting" cities is appropriate, along with the endorsement of the section of the paragraph
referred to above.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to direct the City Manager to prepare a letter stating
consensus of the City Council and include the letter in the Friday Update for City Council review. If the
letter is accepted by the City Council, it will then be forwarded to the Mayor for his signature and mailed to
the appropriate destination.
It was indicated that costs should be minimized along with duplication efforts with the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency.
SOCIAL SERVICE PRESENTATION NORTHWEST HENNEPIN
HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL
Susan Blood, Executive Director, provided an annual update that included information on services provided
by the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council. She discussed total funding and portions of which
are collected by serviced cities.
Anita Perkins, Emergency Services Coordinator, updated the Council on the Emergency Services provided
such as gas cards, food shelves, Domestic Violence Network, Car Care Saturday, New Immigrant Seminars,
Continue with Care (HUD funding), and Guide to Human Services booklet. She discussed assistance with
bus fares instead of gas cards and stated gas cards are in demand for many reasons and therefore less is
spent on bus fare tokens. She explained that the gas cards are purchased in bulk and at a discounted rate
with no discount for Metro Transit bus tokens. She stated approximately 3,500 copies of the Guide to
Human Services are distributed.
Mr. Boganey stated the Guide to Human Services booklet is available on the City's website.
Joshua Xiong, Brooklyn Center resident and member of NWHHSC, discussed the City Profile, employment
assistance, and his appreciation of the work of Susan Blood.
YOUTH COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL
CARS Director Jim Glasoe discussed current programs available to teens in Brooklyn Center. He stated due
to budget cuts in previous years, many teen programs were eliminated due to the fact that they were the
smallest revenue collectors. He stated attention was turned to other service providers who had activities for
teens, including those services in the program brochures. He discussed teen programs that are offered
through the City in 2006-2007. He distributed the Summer 2007 City Watch newsletter and discussed Teen
Activities included. He discussed the Strictly for Teens! brochure that is a collective catalog of programs
offered by Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Maple Grove, and School District No. 279. He discussed
efforts made to assist youth with transportation to programs however stated further efforts are needed.
There was discussion on the removal of the tennis courts at Kylaum Park.
04/23/07 -2- DRAFT
MISCELLANEOUS
There was discussion on the email received by the City Council from Housing Commissioner Kris
Lawrence-Anderson where she stated concern for the revision to Chapter 12-900. It was indicated that Staff
should complete the work on the matter before it is forwarded to the Housing Commission.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to direct the City Manager to draft a letter to the Housing
Commission stating Staff has indicated that the gathering of information is going to take considerable time
and since the City Council respects the time of the Housing Commission, it suggests that the Housing
Commission take the summer off so that progress can be made on the matter and when they return in
September, there should be substantial discussion matter.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council for Staff to continue with standards previously expressed
to Housing Commission.
CONSIDER ORDINANCE LIMITING RATIO OF NON-POROUS TO POROUS SURFACE AREA
WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION
This item was continued to a future Work Session.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember/Commissioner Lasman moved and Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan seconaed
adjournment of the City Council/Economic Development Authority Work Session at 10:32 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
04/23/07 -3- DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
1N THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
JOINT MEETING of BROOKLYN CENTER and BROOKLYN PARK CITY COUNCILS
APRIL 30, 2007
COUNCIL/CONIMISSION CONFERENCE ROOM
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in a Joint Meeting with the Brooklyn Park City Council
at City Hall called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Mary O'Connor, Dan Ryan, and Mark
Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Community Activities Recreation and
Services (CARS) Director Jim Glasoe, Police Chief Scott Bechthold, and Deputy City Clerk
Camille Worley.
Brooklyn Park members present were Mayor Steve Lampi, Councilmembers Rich Gates, Terry
Gearin, Jeff Lunde, Jeanette Meyer, Mark Mata, and Mike Trepanier. Also present were City
Manager poug Reeder, Police Chief Wade Setter, and City Engineer Gary Brown.
INTRODUCTIONS
OPENING REMARKS
Mayor Tim Willson stated this meeting was a good opportunity to meet Councilmembers from
our sister city and build upon and move forward with some of the shared issues.
Mayor Steve Lampi thanked the City for hosting the event. He stated both cities share common
problems, challenges, and goals and he hopes that this meeting will help to start joint efforts.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
RECREATIONAL SERVICES
CARS Director Jim Glasoe stated he would like to plant a seed regarding providing more
services, adding value to tax dollars, and exceeding the expectations of taxpayers. He said that
last fall there was discussion amongst the cities of Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, and New
Hope relating to the par-three golf courses and possibly creating a pass allowing residents of
Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, and New Hope to use all three par-three golf courses for one
price.
04/30/07 -1- DRAFT
Mr. Glasoe proposed that both cities market and promote the use of the Brooklyn Center aquatics
facility and the Brooklyn Park ice facility. He discussed ways through cooperation to exceed the
value expectations of taxpayers. He stated joint marketing would be an option along with
allowing residents to register for joint programs at both Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park
facilities. He discussed the It's Your Summer! brochure that is a joint activities listing with
Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, and Osseo School District No. 279. He stated there are a
number of similarities between programs offered in Brooklyn Center and programs offered in
I Brooklyn Park.
Discussions were held regarding the following: 1) common operations amongst the cities and
whether or not future discussions would continue; 2) whether other school districts were
collaborating with cities to produce a joint activities brochure; 3) providing the opportunity for
residents from both cities to have activities and programs available to them from both cities
i would provide added value and offer something to residents that is unique and extraordinary; 4)
pooling of resources is a good plan and the cities should explore similar efforts with the City of
Crystal and other neighboring cities; 5) activities offered by both cities and whether there was
overlap of some prograrns; 6) collaborative efforts have been successful in other cities; and 7)
possibly combining Park and Recreation Departments at both cities to eliminate duplicate staff
and programs.
HIGHWAY 252 IMPROVEMENTS
Brooklyn Park City Engineer Gary Brown distributed maps of Highway 252 and discussed
adding an additional lane southbound from Brookdale Drive to 73rd Avenue to increase capacity
when the light is green and reducing commute time. He stated concrete medians, catch basins,
and storm sewers will be needed. He discussed conversations with Mn/DOT to review the entire
corridor and impacts of closing intersections at Humboldt Ave and 81 st Avenue. He discussed
traffic statistics of the area and existing peak volumes. He stated an official traffic study has not
been completed; however, State Officials were interested in the proposal. He stated the lights
would be removed at the closed intersections and discussed a trial period. He discussed the
pedestrian traffic at 73rd Ave. He stated Mn/DOT has indicated that Highway 252 would be
reviewed as a possible freeway in 20 to 25 years.
It was the majority consensus of both City Council's to continue to study the options for
Highway 252.
i Mr. Boganey stated he would be more comfortable with the proposed improvements after
feedback is received from the traffic engineer.
CRIME REDUCTION PROPOSAL
Brooklyn Center Police Chief Scott Bechthold presented a proposal for a Crime Reduction
Strategy assembled by the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF). He discussed the
following four phases:
04/30/07 -2- DRAFT
1. PERF staff will become familiar with the cities of Brooklyn Park and Brooklyn Center
and their police departments, as well as the scope of the violent cnme problem m the two
communities. This will be accomplished through an analysis of open-research materials
as well as infortnation provided by the cities.
2. PERF will conduct a site visit to Brooklyn Park and Brooklyn Center. Additional data
will be collected, and the PERF team will conduct a series of interviews with key
members of the police departments, the cities' community leaders, and officials
representing pertinent criminal justice agencies.
3. A detailed analysis of available violent crime information will be conducted for both
cities. A clear understanding of the scope of the problem will be developed, including an
assessment of current crime prevention and reduction strategies employed by the
departments. Underlying conditions and other factors outside of the police departments
contributing to violent crime in the cities will also be identified. This thorough
evaluation will lead to the development of a comprehensive crime reduction initiative.
4. PERF will gather essential stakeholders to attend a one-day Crime Summit to evaluate
the proposed crime-reduction strategies. Participants will come together to cultivate a
common understanding of the violent crime problem in Brooklyn Park and Brooklyn
Center. The Summit will lead to the development of an intervention to reduce violent
crime and disorder in the cornmunities, which attendees can support and commit
themselves to implementing.
He discussed the funding of the proposal and stated the total cost is $44,381. He stated the
proposed cost sharing would result in responsibility of $29,588 for Brooklyn Park and $14,793
for Brooklyn Center.
Brooklyn Park Police Chief Wade Setter discussed the rise of violent crimes in both
communities. He stated Brooklyn Park saw a 92% rise in robberies and Brooklyn Center saw a
40% rise in robberies last year. He discussed trends from around the country and related them to
the two communities.
Discussions were held regarding the communities moving forward with the proposal; the
importance of benchmarks to gauge if the proposed action is working; and possibly including
housing policies in the study.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember O'Connor seconded adjournment of the
meeting at 6:55 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
04/30/07 -3- DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION
APRIL 30, 2007
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met as the Board of Appeal of Equalization called to order by
Mayor Tim Willson at 7:02 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Mary O'Connor, Dan Ryan, and Mark
Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, City Assessor Nancy Wojcik, Hennepin
County Assessor Tom May, Appraiser Jill Brenna, Appraiser Technician Karen Casto, and Deputy
City Clerk Camille Worley.
2. LOCAL BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION (LBAE) CERTIFICATION
FORM
City Assessor Nancy Wojcik explained new regulations and processes for the completion of the
Local Board of Appeal and Equalization Certification form.
3. THE PURPOSE OF THE LOCAL BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION
Ms. Wojcik explained the purpose of the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization.
4. QUESTIONS REGARDING THE LOCAL BOARD OF APPEAL AND
EQUALIZATION DUTIES
There were no questions regarding the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization duties.
5. THE ASSESSOR'S REPORT
e -ins ections for the
Ms. ik re orted rin he su r f 2006 her office conduct d re
Wo�c p that du g t mme o p
2007 assessment of the residential properties located North of 65th Avenue North and West of
Palmer Lake. In addition to all single-family homes located in the review area,
commercial/industrial and apartment properties were reviewed. The summer inspection area
involved the review of approximately 1,822 parcels. All parcels were inspected from the exterior
and the assessor's office inspected the interior of 51% or 936 homes, who responded to tags anc!
04/30/07 -1- DRAFT
I
I
advance notification. She stated the interior inspection percentage is down slightly from previous
i nal 1 602 ermit reviews to the
ears. She stat d review of n im rovem nts added an addit o
y e ew p e p
inspection total. She stated the City estimates that the total number of properties reviewed in 2006
was approximately 3,424.
The overall value changes made to the 2007 assessments were as follows:
Citywide (including all property types) 3.30 percent
Citywide (excluding new construction) 3.10 percent
Citywide (residential single-family detached only) 3.00 percent
Citywide (excluding new construction) 2.80 percent
Commercial (excluding new construction) 6.00 percent
Industrial (excluding new construction) 8.02 percent
Apartments (excluding new construction) -1.20 percent
Condominiums (excluding new construction) 7.30 percent
Co-ops (excluding new construction) 0.00 percent
Townhomes (excluding new construction) 2.40 percent
Double Bungalows (excluding new construction) 5.80 percent
Residential Neighborhoods: #50-#56 All Residential 3.00 percent
(excluding new construction) 2.80 percent
#50-#55 Residential Off Water 3.00 percent
(excluding new construction) 2.80 percent
#56 Residential Waterfront 2.90 percent
(excluding new construction) 2.70 percent
6. QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Councilmember O'Connor in uired about the difference between tax ca acity and assessed value.
q p
Ms. Wojcik responded by explaining that the assessed value is multiplied by a class rate to get the
tax capacity.
7. APPEARANCES BY TAXPAYERS WITH APPOINTMENTS
The following addressed the Council to appeal their 2007 estimated market value:
I Randy Bennett, 3613 Violet Ave N, submitted three market analyses from three realtors. He
discussed the age of the interior of his home and discussed previous increases in property value. He
stated the condition of the home does not warrant the determined property value. He distributed
photographs of neighboring homes and compared the number of bedrooms in his home and theirs.
City Manager Curt Boganey explained that some of the homes that were compared to this property
04/30/07 -2- DRAFT
I
I�
were foreclosure homes which are excluded when values are determined.
Ms. Wojcik explained the process of determining the value of homes in Brooklyn Center. She stated
there are 36 different characteristics considered.
Ms. Wojcik read the report and explained staff's recommendations for property located at 3613
Violet Ave N as included in the packet.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to reduce the property valuation to $191,400 as
recommended by staff.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember O'Connor seconded to reduce the estimated
market value to $191,400 for 3613 Violet Ave N. Motion passed unanimously.
Lorna Jacob, 4212 62 Ave N, stated she is not satisfied with the estimated market value of
$200,700 and stated that the only improvement she made was an additional toilet in the basement.
Ms. Wojcik read the report and explained staff's recommendations for property located at 4212 62
Ave N as included in the packet.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to reduce the property valuation to $196,000 as
recommended by staff.
Councilmember O'Connor moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to reduce the estimated
market value to $196,000 for 4212 62" Ave N. Motion passed unanimously.
William Kenny, 7036 Willow Lane, explained that with his experience in valuation of homes, he
feels his home valuation is incorrect. He stated the comparable sales used are inappropriate because
of the characteristics of the homes used. He displayed and discussed various market analyses
comparable to his home.
Ms. Wo'cik read the re ort and ex lained staff's recommendations for ro e located at 7036
J P P p P rtY
Willow Lane as included in the packet. She discussed the process of calculating the land valuation
and the home valuation.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to accept the property valuation as presented by
the City Assessor.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to sustain the estimated
market value of $374,700 for 7036 Willow Lane. Motion passed unanimously.
Henry Yang, 6207 Regent Ave N, did not appear before the board.
Ms. Wo'cik read the re ort and ex lained staff's recommendations for ro e located at 6207
J P p P p�'
Regent Ave N as included in the packet.
04/30/07 -3- DRAFT
It was the ma'ori consensus of the Ci Council to acce t the ro e valuation as resented b
J�' tY P P P rtY P Y
the City Assessor.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to sustain the estimated
market value of $197,900 for 6207 Regent Ave N. Motion passed unanimously.
Michael Barthold, 7216 Willow Lane, did not appear before the board.
Ms. Wojcik read the report and explained staff's recommendations for property located at 7216
Willow Lane as included in the packet.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to accept the property valuation as presented by
the City Assessor.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember O'Connor seconded to sustain the estimated
market value of $384,000 for 7216 Willow Lane. Motion passed unanimously.
Ralph Thomas, 2050 Freeway Blvd, AmericInn, did not appear before the board.
Ms. Wojcik read the report and explained staff's recommendations for property located at 2050
Freeway Blvd as included in the packet. She explained that the valuation of these properties is
primarily accomplished through an analysis of the rental market, potential income, and the sales
market. She stated the potential market income to a property is best estimated by analyzing recent
leases, rental listings, and published data like the Real Estate Tracking Service of the Minnesota
Real Estate Journal and the Colliers Towle Report. She stated all of these sources and more have
been employed by the assessor's office to ensure that the current assessed values follow the market
as closely as possible.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to accept the property valuation as presented by
the City Assessor.
Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to sustain the estimated market
value of $3,502,000 for 2050 Freeway Blvd. Motion passed unanimously.
Rosita Acosta, 5949 Xe�es Ave N, did not appear before the board.
Ms. Wojcik read the report and explained staffls recommendations for property located at 5949
Xe�es Ave N as included in the packet.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to accept the property valuation as presented by
the City Assessor.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to sustain the estimated market
value of $181,400 for 5949 Xerxes Ave N. Motion passed unanimously.
04/30/07 -4- DRAFT
Rosita Acosta, 5913 Admiral Lane did not a ear before the board.
PP
I
Ms. Wo'c' r i ns for ro e located at 5913
ik read the eport and explained staff's recommendat o p p rty
Admiral Lane as mcluded in the packet.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to accept the property valuation as presented by
I the City Assessor.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to sustain the estimated
market value of $199,600 for 5913 Admiral Lane. Motion passed unanimously.
8. APPEARANCES BY TAXPAYERS WITHOUT AN APPOINTMENT
I
Steve Schleif, 6724 Toledo Ave N, stated with his real estate experience, he feels the valuation
of his property is inappropriate.
Hennepin County Assessor Tom May discussed why foreclosure properties are not included in the
I valuation process.
Ms. Wojcik discussed the property and calculations of valuations for the property located at 6724
Toledo Ave N.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to direct staff to reinspect the property and revisit
the issue at the continuation hearing on May 14, 2007.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to continue the market value of
6724 Toledo Ave N to the May 14, 2007, hearing. Motion passed unanimously.
Larry Carlson, 5905 Ewing Ave N, stated he recently purchased the home and had it appraised at
$208,000.
Ms. Wojcik discussed the property and calculations of valuations for the property located at 5905
Ewing Ave N.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to direct staff to do an interior review of the
property located at 5905 Ewing Ave N.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to continue the market value of
5905 Ewing Ave N to the May 14, 2007, hearing. Motion passed unanimously.
9. CONSIDERATION OF WRITTEN APPEALS
Ms. Wojcik read the report and explained staff's recommendations for property located at 5915 John
04/30/07 -5- DRAFT
Martin Dr as included in the packet.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to accept the property valuation as presented by
the City Assessor.
Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to sustain the estimated market
value of $550,000 for 5915 John Martin Dr. Motion passed unanimously.
10. SET DATE OF LOCAL BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION
RECONVENE MEETING
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to reconvene the Board of Appeal and
Equalization meeting on May 14, 2007, at 6:00 p.m.
7. RECESS
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to adjourn the meeting at 9:38
p.m. Motion passed unanimously.
�i, 04/30/07 -6- DRAFT
E,,.,
a
F
Y
r.
S
3 3
i
s
i
k
F
J:
.:i r:
:i f
i ,Sx r .9
i
r
i i
'R'-: i
n
v y
�n
4
r
S
N.
3
.�l..
i
3
..,i
:.q z.>,
.l,
i
F., n
j
k^ :r
E 5
.r:
.:>i
'.:i
4
:i i:
t
i
..t
J
s
�����F� ���"�T' ���+�w�k� ����������'�IM�' �X����������M iRP l',:
z
i 3
�r
r.. r
F
P
,.i
r
s
.c
::e
E
r,
4
3
s
r
.9
t
4
'.t:: r.
zt
vk
S=
y i
x
t
i
S
I
4.
a� ..z `z:
ti
���'F
r
.�.'i
s: :.0
�L
n: .i
s 4
.t.
I ..i�
i�.
.4
'�i i.'. ';i
I
:y
i
o, 5
iIIL
CUUNCIL ITEM MEM(}RANLIUM
er
TU: Curt Boganey, �ty Manag
FRUN�: Sharan Knutson, City Clerk
DATE: Ivlay 8, 2Q07
I SITB�C1': Lice�s far Cauncil Appmvat
Rect�mmeudation.
1 recommend thai the +City Council approve the follawin� list c�f Iicenses at its May 14, 2�U7,
meeting.
�ackgrouiad:
The fotlowing busi�esseslpersans have applied for City licenses as noted. Each businesslperson
has fulfille� the reqwrements af the City Ordinance g4veming cespective lic�ns�s, subm�tted
�pp�pria#e applications, and paid proper fees.
AMUS�NNIE�T�' DIYICES
CDL {Davan�ni's, MTC4, Broc�klyn Center Legion) I 10°ll 93` Ave N, Maple Grtive
FIREWURKS-PERI4IANENT
Big Lots #�494 59�U Earle Brown Drive
FIREW4RKS-TEIVIPORARY
Cub Fvc�� 3245 County Ac�ad 0
ME�HA►lI:VIC�L
F�r� M�c�►anica� inc 3520 88� ,Aue N�, Blain�
Northern Heating Air Cond, Inc, 4431 Alpine i)rive NW, R:ainsey
Paul Sta�f'+�rd Electric, Htg, Go�linp 6225 �arnbridge Stree�t, Minnea�ol�s
Practical Systems 4342� Shady tlak �toad, Ho��
1125 American
Blvd E Bloo vn
lid Refri eratioan LLG t
So
g
St. Cloud Refrigeration 6(k� Lincoln Ave NE, St. Clond
T�tal Comfort 4Q00 Wuu�etka Ave P+t #1�0, New Hope:
tJHi. �ompany Ir�c 9Q65 Zachar�y I�ane 1�T, Maple Gxove
REN�"AL
R�newal
7(?t?-$9U b5�' Ave N �lie�sch Cc�nstrutctit�n
1 AssAU11
12 Dist �'eac�
1 �iu��lary
I We��ns
3 Grimes Against Family
i
1 Fire
1 Ubstn�cting Justice
1 Sex Crime
1 Auto heft
'I (Th� were no c�1s for service fc�r the following)
522� b5th Ave �1 Nick Morris
5637 Emers�n Ave N Do�glas Federson
6fl37 Ewing Ave N Thor Ya:ng
2'741 �re�way Blvd, (M�tel 6 Mana�:ger Apt.) Motel 6
3913 France Fl B�tty Nelson
5948 Fremont Ave N Ryan Catler
5548 Girard Ave N Berissv Bekuto
7211 Girarrd Ave 1'1 fiomrny "Vang
4519 Woadbine Ln Benson 'Vang
Initial
{�re wer� nfl ca�ls �or service f�r the following)
5801 ��vinng Ave N Christina Akinola
G412 Lee Ave N DeLaine Fritz
593b Unit� Ave i�I Edwina Willie
'12i7 �nity Ave N Franklin Stovatl
SIGN�IAN+�EIt
;Express Sig�s Balic�ns, Inc. 19324 Yucvn Str ATW, Ceda�r
�3iemeia"s Signs Graphics, Inc. 1035 E. Cli€f Rd, Burn�ville
Si�n�crafters 7775 Maiu� Str, Mi�neapolis
Tautvs Sign Co 17'�0 Z8U`� St, Shafer
'Toplin� AdveMis�ng 11775 Justen Ci�rcl�, N�apie �Grove
Bndge# Iss�uesz
'I"t�ere are no �ud�et issues to consider.
i
I
l..���
y
t. N
f
+L
;t
c
Y
y
i:: .;c
;t
'S:
r
^c`
n:�� i
S t
.,:.5
l
L y
3
e
.:t
f
n.
y l 5.
H
.�y
.:r
Y
n
...s: ..a
r
....i.
vi
9 r
.i
i:: :c
t
Z
:::.i
t,. ay
5
r k
..'S n,
..w.::
o:
alf
f.
t..
„r
A
i
Yt;
t.�
Q
i »w>
x
r
,s: i
:..r
4
t
z
,s.
x r,
4.
'i
�,s.::
:a i�
y
:s
r
.i
.:�:5.
.s r
r.:
I
r
....:a
.s x
,5
r
.,q
::.r
:a
3
I
�rc;
r ....:,w �3
CUUAtCIL 1TEM MEMO�UUM
T�; Curt Boganey, City M�nager
FRUM: Tutid Bloms�ram, I3ir�ctor of Pubtic Wc�rks '�"`l��
llATE; May 7, 2007
SUB.tECT: Resolution Accepting Wark Performed and Aathc�rizing Fina�l Payment,
Impmvemeni Pmje�t Nos. 2006-01, O2, 03 U4, Cantract 2Q06�-A, Centerbrook
Area N�ighborhood Street, Storm Draina�e and Utility Improvements
Reco�meadation:
Public Wc�rks siaffrecommends that the Braoklyn Center Ciry Cauncil accept the wark p�rfarmed
and au�or'tze final payment for the Centerbaok Area Neightx�rhaod Street, Starm Drainage and
UtAlity Improvement project.
Bsckgrc�und.
On April 2�, 2U06 tl�e City Council awazded Contract 200b-A #c� Ar�on Cc�nst�uction Cornpany, Tnc,
uf Ha�ris, N�.innesota for the cc>nstructian of the Centerbrook Area Neighbarbood Street and Utiiity
Itnprove�nent praje�ct. Arcan Construction has completed the ct�nsfiruction work aa�r►►d is now
t�qu�g final payment for the proj�ct.
Budget Issues:
fik�e origina� c+�ntract a?mount for the Centerbrook Area Neighborhood Improvements was
$2,230,66�.4f�, The City Couz�c�l ap�roved Change Order No. 1 on 3uly 1�, 204b in order to revise
t�e scope of work pursuant tQ the written contract. The tot�l valus of work eertified for final
payment is $2,23E,61�.36, which iTICIUCIE5 �Change Order Na. l�nid f�nal contract quantity
adjustr�aenis. The chala$e c�rder and final quantity adjus�ments resul;t in ax► increase frorn the arigin�l
cs�ntract amount of less th� ane l} percent. The attaehed resolutifln provides a swmmary of funding
sour+�es for t�e project.
Gsnterbrvo& Ftnal Paymenr R�xolutinn
Member introduc�d the following r�lution and rnoved
its auic��tic►�:
A;ESCJLUTION I�30.
RES4LUTIC?N ACCEPTING WORK PERFQR.MED AND AUTHQR.L�TNG FINAL
PAY`MEI'�IT, IMPRUVEMENT PR()3ECT NOS. 2�-�1, t�2, 03, 04,
Ct3NTRACT 2006-A, CENTERBROOK AREA 1V'EIG�BORH{�(]D STREET,
ST+(�RM D12AINAGE AND LITII.ITY IlVIPRQVEMENTS
�,�HEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the +City a�'Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, Arcon Construction Campany, Inc. of Harris, Minnesota has cc►mpleted the following
irnprovernent in accorclance with said conttact:
Improvernent �.'roject Nos. 2006-OI, Q2, 03 04, Cc�ntract 2U0�-A, C�nterbrook
Area l�eighborh�od Street, Storm Draina�e �nd Utility Improvements.
N{3'VV, THEREF4�tE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ciry Council of the City of
Braaklyn Center, Minnesota that:
l. Final payment shall be made on Improvem�nt pz�rject Nos. 2046-01, Q2,
03 and 04, Contract 2006-A, Centerbro�k Area Neighborhood Stre�t and
[Jtility Improvements, taking the contra�ctor's receipt in ftill, T'he total
estimat+edi amount to be paid for said improvem�nts under saad contract
sha11 be $2,236,619.36.
2. The estimated praject costs and revenues are hereby amended as fatiows:
�(3STS As Approved Av�ard, As Final
C�ni�t 2,234,6b7,4U 2,233,b44.36
Cuntingency Gosts 223,(300.04 7,259.72
Cl�ange (Jrd�rr 1"30, 1 S Q 2�975.40
Subtatal Constructi�n Cost 2,4S3,6C?.4U 2,243,87�.08
Ad�nnin/LegalJEngr. 20U,520.flU 1 I S,G25.00
Refarestataon 24.400,OU 13.I45.(l0
Total Estimated Project Cast 2,b74,18?.�U 2,375,�r49,{?8
RESOLUTIQN Np.
RE'VEAtUFS As A�proved Award As Final
S#reet Ass�essment 423,15C.� �23,156.p0
Storm D!rainage Assessment 124,484.U0 124,Q8Q.00
Water Utility Fund 461,+D9U.40 407,231.29
Sanitary S�wer Utility 520,337.05 46fi,321.29
Stvrm Draina�e Utility Fund 452,385.96 4U3,184,�9
St�eet Constr�etic�n Fund bb2,441,99 519,3'79.51
Street Light Utility S 30.696.00 31,296.00
Total Estimated Revenue 2,674,187.4p �,375,6�19.0$
Mav 14, 2Q0'7
Uate Mayoz�
ATTEST:
�ity Clerk
T'�e motion for the advption of th� faregoing resolutian was duly second� by rnember
and ug+�n vate bein� taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereaf
and the fc�llowia�� vc�ted against ttie san►e:
whereupon said res�Iution was declared duly passed and ad�pted.
F
a•
n.
1
i C
a
t
r'.
v .�i
u
.t..�..c
f
i
7
i
.ri
l
j
A
n .z
i:
i:
i 'i
Z
...i ..,z
5,.
Sl
Z f
x.
z
s
h
v.
�s
t
z
.z
�.:.:s
p'
;i
„E<..
..z
x
,.��r�x"'����k��w� .�.���A"' 3#���r. .�,.��4µ��'�� �����������w ��4N�'�
r
i
r;
3
n,
,::s
s:
i
i
s:
J
Y
r .3
s
i
s
F F
a
'1
4
i n
..i
b
�5. f e ;;'i
t
V� C
i
:.:i
i
r
i v ��'r 'r v
.r
..r. 9
3
5..
5
F
:y
r Y
t
i r
i
�t:..:
i
i h
,":x
Yf
;F
y
.0
f
F? Y�
b
f{.
h
rv 1'.
a;:
"i
1
a
:.c
s�.
:i
y
s
i i .i
.s
z
.:.c<
r
COUNCIL ITEM MEMt}RANI)UM
I TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
�RQM. Tc�dd Blomstram, Dir�+ctor af Public Works
T1ATE; May 7, 2007
SUBJECT; Resalution Accepting Quota.tian and Awarding a Contract, Impruv�ment Project
Nv. 2007-13, Cnntract 2047-C, Reforestatian of 20Q6 �treet Impravement Project
i +Areeas
Iltecomme�nd��oII:
I Public Works staff recommends ihat the Brooklyn Center ��ty Cour�cil aecept the lowest
quotation and a�ard a contr�t to Fair's Garden Center for Irnpr4ve�nent Project Na. 240'7-13,
Contract 2007-C, Refcrrestation �f 2UOb Street Improvement Project Areas.
Background:
As part of the Cent�rbrook Ar�a Neighborfiood Street and Utility �rnprovernents, trees w�re
xernoved frorn the boulevarcis nf properties due to conflicts with the installation of sanitaty sewer
�nd water services. The City's reforestation program aliows pxop�aty owners Lo replace one tree
I for every mature tre� lc�st. The City has implemented t�e reforestation prograrn for many yea�s.
�s
Earlier this wintterr, all residents within the 2006 proj�ct area w�o had a tr�e(s) remaved were
offered a s+el�tion ofih� following s�x species to replace the tree(s) lost:
Northwood �aple
American Li�den
Sug�r 1�laple
I Flowering Crabapple (Nc� Fnxit)
rado S ruc�
�olo
F
I�vuglas F'ir
Bas+�c1 on tlae respun�s fmm the praperty owners, a Request for Quotatioz�� was established and
s�nnt to fc�ur nuxseries in the metropolitan area. On April 8, 2U47, q�otations were r�ceived from
twa tree cc�ntrac#c�rs: Fair's Garden Center of Maple Grove in the arnount t�f �13,145.44 and
Midw�,st �.ands�ap�s in the a�macant of $14,Q72,9b. 'fk�e propos�d c�ntract inclt�des a t�tal Qf 63
tre+es fc�r reforesta#ion,
Budget Issu+�r
Funding for tre.� r�placements within the Centerbrook Area Neighborhaod Tmprovement Project
I wa� reserved by t�e Cit}� Council in 2006 during the proje�ct approval process.
R� ares#ativrr l2�sotution
f
I
Member intraduced the following res�lution and moved its
ad+�ptior�:
RESOLtJTI4N NO.
R�SOLUTI�N ACGEFTING QUOTATI4N AND AWARDII�G A C4NTRACT,
IIvIPRQVEMENT PROIECT NC}. 2007-13, COI+iTRACT 2QQ'�-C,
I�.EFORESTATrf3N QF 2�J06 STREET DviPROVEMENT PRtJJECT AREA�
VfJHEREAS, the follc�wing quotations were rec�ived and op�nec� an April 1 S, 2007 for
Irtriprowement Proj�ct No. 2007-13, Cc�ntract 2007-C, Reforestation t�f 2006 Street Impravement
Praj�t Areas. Said quatatic��s were as follows:
Bidder Bitt Amount
Fair's Gazden Ce�ter 3,145.4U
Midwesi I.andscape,s $14,072.96
WHEREAS, it appears tk�at Fair's Garden Cent�r is the lowest respanszble bidder.
NC)W, THEREFt}RE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City vf Broc�klyn
Center, I4�esota, that the City Manager is hereby authorized to �nter fnto a cor�tract vvith Fair's
Gazden Center in the n�me af the City of Brooklyn Center for Impraveme�it Project N�. 2007-13,
Reforess#atic�n af 20U6 Street Improvement Project Areas according tc� the plans and specificarions on
file in the office c�f the Uirectar af Public Works.
Mav 14, 2�07
Uate Mayor
A'T"T'EST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adopiion af t�e foreguing resolution was duly secc�nd� by m�nber
and up4n vote b�zng taken thereon, th� followin.g voted in favor tl�er�f:
and the following v+�t�d �ainst the same:
vvhereupc�n s,a�d resolution was d�lared duly passed and adopted.
4
F r
a i
e.
v 'i.�,.
t' r
4
i
...r:
.:x v
t,�
j,.,: l 4
,y>
i
4
�'S i�
s
�x
r
v
i��
i
I
l
y.
.c
c
v
�1
Y
J:
i
i..r
e
x
r
i t
4
w
..'.i
".c
3:
E
I
,{j%
I�p!
s
n
v
x.� i
J
5. t
..x s
P 4
i
i
3
I
yi������ +�+���u����+���.�r�� �.���M� �����i���l
a
r:
t
v
5
����s ������+�"����+�i,,.� ���������������,�x���
w
A.
x
.z
•2 ?:Q
.e..:
K,
i:
3..��: 5
I
x.:
F:
i. e
r
t:
':t
�ti�
5
H
r: t
:ti
n
E
.i'
v
<:v
,i.
e
I 4
..�:i
.i:
3:
v
;F
n
f'
r
y,..
t
t
r
r
F,
r
t
F.
s
r
u
�a
s
z
i
.v a;:
r
�r ���+�����.��J�w�. ���y����������'�"
.rt i� z
�ir
n
t: a
i
E
x
r
s
v
r
N
f
r
r
i v
r�
t
3
p
i
i�
a
v.
5
y
q�
t-, ro
3
..i
i
s
���r�+': �y���'�`�� 1�����M������� Mw��������� in�
y��w����� i"
`i 'a
v:.:,::
n
r
f
t.
M1
j
t��
'?t': i
r.
:q
x.:�
7
i
.S
n.:
':.Y:;
v: e:.
:v:
c 4
i
x
i
,'i
h i:
v
4
I
n�
Jr
::i
n:: �i.
.:y..
v i
z i
y::
..n
�T
.4
la :5
...e
v
r.� 5:
I v�.. i.
�'s
E i
i
E
i
�i'
�r:
i;: i
.i./ F
5
m
i:
.�i
v:.
i
v
..�ie.
t
...:e
s er,:�
.....ri
n. i
:.�x •a l
4
X
.i�
.�e:. y
.c e
TUc Cu�t Boganey, City �Vlanager
F'Rf3NI: Ranald A. Warr�n, Flannin aad Zonin S ialist �/+�'t,./
S b
Il►A'TEs May 7, 200?
SUBJEC"I'; Plannit�g Commission Appiication Na. 20Q7-0Q8
Recommenda�ion;
It is recommended that the City �uncil, follawing consideration €�f this matter, appmve th�e
applicatic�n subject t+� the coz�ditions and consideration re�or�nnende� in Pian�ung Commissi�n
Resalution Nr�. 2IX37-02, Attached for the City Cowncil'a ct�ns icleratioa is.
1, R�vlu�on Rxgarding tbe Uisposition of Plan�ain� Con��sic�n Applica�io� No.
�t�07-OU8 submitt�i by Seth Uliver.
C�n the l�ay 14, 2�Q4?' City Cuu�il Age�cla is Pl�naing Com�ssion Appii�io� Nt�. 2Q07-0�8
submi� by Seth tJiiver r+equestin� Flanneci Unit D�vclopr�nt An��nt �nd
d�v�lvpme�u pi�n agprovai of the first phase of a two building hotei �mp�ex cc�nsistiag of an
eight swry, 175 rc�am hotel, 1{l(I seat arestaurant and au enclased comae�tioa ta the Fart� Brc�wn
I�Ierita�e C�r, Tl�is matter was c.onsider�d by th�e Plat�nin� Commissic�n at ���r Apri12�,
2�'7 me�ting ar�d was rec�mme�3a3 for approval.
Atcach� �or yaur revi�w are cApi� of the Planning Commission Informaiion Shs�t fi>r
Pl �o io� Agplicatic>n No, 2007-0(�8 a�l also an area n�ap showing the locatiu� of
the pr ct�nsiderativn, varit�us site and building plans fc�r tb:e pr
developm��, the P�a�nia�g C sion minui�es rel to the �.'�ic�n's consiticratioa: of
this matter, Pianning Cr�mm�ssi�n� Resalution No. ?.00'7-4't a�i o�r suPPorti�g dcffcuments:
B�d�et 'Tl�ere are no bud�ct i�ues,
Applieation Filed o� 3-29-07
Ciry Gauncil Actic�n Should Be
c�
Take� By 5-28-U7 (6� Days}
Plan�g Commission inf'4nnatian Sheet
Appiication l�To. ZOt}7-�(Kt8
A�tplicant; Seth 01i�ve� (Bmakl�m Hutcl Partners, L,I.C�
Location: b34�? Earle Brown Drive
Request: Plaim� Unit I}evelt�pment Amendment
The applicant, Brian Mo�se of SJ.A Architects represen#ing Seth t3liv�r (Brocrkl�rn Hotel Partners,
LLG� is s+�icing a Flanued Unit F3evelopment Amendrneut and devetvpment plau approval for
thc first phas� nf twa huiidin� hotel camplex cansisting af an eight story,l7S roam h�teI and
i00 seat restaurant with an enclosexi canne�tion to the Earle Brc�wn H�it�e Ce�ter on a vacaat
6,2 acre site addressed as 6300 E�r1e Brown Ihive.
The prc>perty in qu�stion is zs�ned PUI�/CIA {P'lanned Unit Developm�nt/Service�-O�ce, no
heighi linut) ar�d is lucate� on the east side of the west 1eg €af Eari� Brc�wn Drive adjac�nt to #he
Eazle Bmwn �Ieritage Canter. It i� baund+ed on tbe west and no� by Earle B�ronwn I}rive urith a
six stt�ry of�ice building and i-94 right of way on the opgasite side of stteet; c�n the east by #he
Frarl� B�nown Heritage Center which is zoned C-2 (Commerce); and on the scruth by a high rise
offics building {City-Caunty Fedcral Credit Union) zaue�i CiA.
A Flaun�d Uni# Developm�nt rezoning from CIA to FUDfCIA snd development pian aq�pr�oval
for four and seven story, 25U arooaan hotel with 100 seat rc�taura�t and a 32,(�U sq. f�. water
park in�ludi.ng an �ncic�sed walkway conn��tion to the Earie Brc�wn Heritage Ce�ter was
apPmved for this same �ite by tirP City Council under Gity Council Resolutioz� ATa. 2�5-97 trn
]une 27, 2�45, Atta+ched for the Cc�mmissivn's review is a copy of the �olution containirt$
v�rious findings CQI1SIt�+�i'c�1,�4ILS �IId CQi1tIlh011S Of 8p]7�IOV+�I �O� �I �12t?]}0"a�
Tzansie�t lodging a�ci iat�ti uses are permittod uses in the CIA zoning district. fihe site in
question is also in #he �i#y's �C (Central Commerce (3verlay District� which lists allowabte and
pro�bited us�s in the C7verlay di�drict� Traasient lodging, e�atin� e�t�blishments including e,ating
estab ents offeriz�g live +�ntertainment and recreation and am�ent pla�es are uses alsa
a�lc►w�d in the t)verlay di�strict.
Th� applicant is nt� longer purs�umg the hateUwater parlc prc�sa� azid is now se�ektng a PU�
amendment to a11ow a two buildin� hotel complex with one building containing 175 hotel rocams
and a��4 seat restaurani a�i th� second building with ?5 rc�ms. The developm�nt piarn
ap�arpval compre,h�ds the f� phase c�nly that being an eight stQry, I7S toom hot+�l and
I restaura�t incl}�ding an enclos� c��me�tion to the F.arle Brown Heritage Ccnt��r. They are als�a
se�eking c�nc+�pt �pproval fs�r the se+co�nd ph�se, a fut�re 75 room hoteL Finat apprc�val fc�r the
sec+�nd p}� w�ll require aa� a�nendment to ttus proposed Planned Unit Develapment.
�-25 �7
i Page 1
As tl�e Commissic�n is a��re, #he PU� grocess invotv� a rez�ning af �and ta the PUll
designatic�n fc�Ilovved by an atpha numeric designation a�'the under�ying zoning district, This:
�d+�rlyin� zoning district provides the regulations gavertung usdes and strucha�res within the
Plar�nn�+d Unit I)evel�pment. The rules and regutation� governing that district (in this cas� C�A)
wauld apply ta the c�evelopmeat proposal unless the city wece ta d�#�,xmane that anat�er stanclard
ar use would be appropriate ,given miti�ating circumstances that aze c�ff s�t by the plaz�
submit#�c1 by the develop�r. One of the pwposes of the PUD district is ta givc the City Cc�uncil
the n�ecteci flexibility in addr�ing development and recievelapment problems. Iiegul�ions
�ov�rning uses and siructur�s may be modifieci by conditions ul#ima#ely impost�ci by the City
Council on tt�� develcrpm�n# p1a�s. The PLTD process involves a re��ing of laa+d, therefore, �s
subje�t to n� g the ci�'s Rezc�ning Evaluation Policy and R�vi�w Cuidelines t�at are
con#ainecl in S�c�ion 35-2U8 of the city's zoning ordina�ace. A.iso, proposals must l�t cvnsistent
witt� �ectic�a 35-355 ofthe city's zaning ardinance which ad es Plann�d Uni# I�veiopme:nts.
Attachccxi for the Con�missifln's re�ricw are capies of 3ectian 35-208 and 35-355 of fhe city's
z�ning ordinance. As mea�tioaed prr�vviausly, the City Ccruncil adpptt�d a resolutirnn appmving the
crverall �'IJD for #his area of the city. 'That resolution cont�ined the various findings and
cvnsiderations niecesssaiy fvr agpnoving thc PUD. Thr�e fix�dinings and cQns�derations were made
givcn the applicant's use and #h�is amendmen# is to aclrnowl�ige the �uildin� dctails and Ioca�on
of an �nended propQSal within t�e FtJD zoning district. Approval c�f th�s Plann�ti Unit
Development aanendrnent should acknawledge campatibil�ty with the Policies and Review
Guidelines oft�e previc�usly mentioned Section 35-20$ and also the pmvisions ofSection 35=355
o#'the zc�ni�g rrrdinance.
It is b+elieved that the propos�d amc:nndment submitted by the agPlicant is in ke�ir�g with the
fu� and considerativns a�ciateci with the original approval. The proposed amen+dment �arY
be c�nsidere� consistent and cvn�atible with s�urounding lanci uses in #his area, T'�e
dev�lopm�t p�an amendm�nt beizxg submitted will, like the originMal a}�pmval, seck
mt�d�fications t� o' ce standards to allow no 1 S#t, gr�n s�ip a�ang the Eazl+a Brown Dri��
st�et rig�t c�f w�y, No otheei� modiScations fram the und�rlyin$ �ni�zg r��ircme�fi:� a�e being
sc�ught by the appli�ant wit�i th�is Plannad Unit ]�velapm�nt. it i� believed ihat #he paro�sed use
�f the pr� �wil] be, as sh�ov�rn in the site ar►d building plan �on of this rep�rt, r.vnsisten�
and +c�umpatible wit� the i�nrn�iat�e �rrea surrc�unding t�e pmperty as we11 as in the general
vicinity. 'T1us sad amendment to be a�oad use of the pmperCy in the corrte�c# of
c�ve�all development i� this �rea and will be a goad long zainge us� and c�n b+e cc�nsidere�i tQ be in
the best %�ter�t of th� �nrnmw�ity.
SITTE ANI) �3UUII,DINGr PLAN PR:t�PQSAL
The pro PUD am�d�ent, as mention�i previausly� is far a two buildin� hoiel cumplex
witla ihe firs� bu�ildit�g bein� an eight �t�ry, 1'15 room �c�t�I with a� l UU seat restauraut havin�
�nc� conn�tia� tt� t�+� Earle Brawa� Heritage Ce�r. T'la� s�o�d b�ulding would be �?5
rooz�a hc�t�l (Pb�ase I�. F' appr��al for #he �xond p wili r�uir� an amendm�nt tr� this
p{c>�ci Planned U�at l��r��ogm�nt. A modification tc� th� CIA r�quire�me�t� 8 P���
by th� a�ppliC�t w�nuld be a�lc�yvecl to �ave no 15 ft. striip alcm� the F,arl+� B�wn Dr�ve
Pa�ge 2
street nght af way. This madification is propose� to make a more �ffici�ut t�se of the site which
is sli�,htly smallcr than neccssary to a�commodate parkicig and Ianciscaping requirements. The
�PPlicant has pro�crsed to �ffset or mitigate the negative a�sp�ects of #he lack t�f �n s�rip by
providing a 3 h to 4#�. high decorativ� fence of masonry piers and coatec� polymer fen�ing
simila�r to csther sc�reening/fencing materisi used where s#�p� in oth+er Planncd Unit
I3�velvprnen#s have been alloweci ta be less tha►i 15 ft. T'his was �Iso authori�ed ur�der ttie
origi�al p1�e�l Unit I}�velc�ment� It is betiewod that thi� ��nt aloi�g wi� the landscap�
plan shoUld pmvide an �prc�priate buffer ta offs�t the lack of 13 ft. gr�en s�ip in this ar�a.
ACCESS/PARI�iG
Access to this site will be at five tacations along Earl� Brawn I3rive. Twa of the ac.cess point�
are �hared accesses, one with the City +County Fc�eral buitdi�►� to #t�e south and the ather ta the
Eazle Brawn Heritage Center to the east, Twa af the ttc�n-shared accesses Iine up with the access
�rives �cross Farle Brr�wn l�ri�ve serving the of�'ice buildiag and the t:hird is directly to the north
of the hvtel building wiih nc� clase a+ccess on the opposite side of Earle Bmwa Drive.
1�. t4tal af 32� parking spaees aze require�i far the two hot�ts, one af which cunt��ins a lt� seat
resta�u�nt. The zaning ordi�ance �uires ane parking space for every hotel r�om and one sgace
ft�r eac� empi+�yee on any a�e �ft and one parking spr� for every two r�staurant s�ts and
every two emplcayees in the resta�rant operation. A ta�tal af at l+e�,st 325 pazking spaces would be
requared to a�ccommodate the t�o phase develapment, The firs� phase, h+�wever, would have a
parki�ag require�neni of 2S0 spaces. A totai of 295 pazking spaces arc to be cons�ructed underrthe
first phase leaving only 45 p spaces remaining for the '7S r+oom sec+ond pha�se deveic�pmen�
It is a1st� pl t�at the s�nd ph�s+e hotel siie would be divided 5�m this P�rpertY t�uSh
the platti�g p leaving, in tha# case, a deficiency on the firs# p�►�se hatel site. These
discr�.pancies must be a�3 appropriately priar ta r�comm�nding approval uf this Pla�ned
Unit I)evelap�ent, it is anticipat� that a farmal cross pa�kin� ent and �arking
cledacatio� with th� F.arle Brown Heritage Center will be accomplished at the time the pmperty is
r+�pla�tte�d,
GR�tIl+IGI�RAIl�IAGElUTILTTIES
The applicant has provic3ed pr�liminazy grading, drain�ge, utility and erosion co�h�i pla�ns w�ich
are being reviewred by the I�irextar of Fubiie Warks/City Engineer. His writte�n comm+�t� with
r to tlus pr��sal will l�e �ttach� with this infor.matiun she�et.
T�is si� is approximately 6.2 in area and will t� �qui�red to have a fommzal "�JV�tershed
a�ement Cc�mmissic�n review, Stc�rm sewer will be pruvided throug�ic�u# th�e �ite to col1�
storm w� to be conveyed ta ar� �pande�d pond on the �ite. "Tl�ia pcand �ves this si#e, thc C�ty
County Feder�l buil `�ite and tlae Earle Brovsrn Heritage +C�ter.
Sar��ary sewer and water are availabl� within Eazle Browa� D�ive right of way and s�we�r a�
water cc�nne.cti�ns are tc� be made to the buil+ding at vari�u� l+�catic�n� indica#ed on #he utility p�an.
P
A tra#�ic im act stud for the #h�n serl hateVwater was com leted b Bte�shoff a�d
P Y pmPa A� P
a f #hat
�!►ssociate�, Inc. t the time o the original Plarllaed Unit Development. That study indic�t�ci
the exist�n facilities would b the
be �1e ta ati uatel aGCOmttrnodate th traffie enerat
�9 Y Y
prapos+ed developmear►t. It zs not anticipate,� that this praject would ��nerai� a�ter am+�unt of
t�af�ic �:han t�e proposed hotel, res�aurant and water paric proposal a►nd, #h�efi�re, cxisting
facilities shc�uld 1� a�le tp adequately a�ccommodate the traffic gen�ted by t�tis amended
P��.
8612 curb and $utter zs r�quirecl aroun�d all pazking a�nd driving areas #a sssist with dr�ina�;e c�n
the site. The City En�gine�t is r�questi�ng a dedication af a drainage and utili�y �asement over all
portians vf th� e�cpandecl stonm water detention pond with �e hotet progerty.
LANDS�APIl�1G
I 1`he applicant h�s submitted a lantlscape plan in response to the landscage p�int system utilized
by the Planning Commissicrn to evaluate such plans. Tlais 6.2 acre site rec�uires 412 iandscape
p�ricnts, The lar� plan provided shaws a total of 453 Iand�cape �ir�ts divide�d betwe�n the
tw4 potential sites. The site pruposed for the eight stc�ry Embassy �uites and restaurant contains
284 paints w�1e the Future hotcl site contain�s 169 paints. T1�c t�t�l plan calls for 13 R�xlm+�nd
Lintien primu�ily in th� islanc� ar�as of the paTking lot fc�r the twa buildings a�td alsQ in the tar�e
island area by the fro�t en#ra�ce to tbe building. Tweanty conife�aels traes such as Alack Hi11s
Spruce and ��lsazn Fir ar� pruvided in various locations around tt�e two builciir�gs. Si�cty ni�ae
decorative #r�s inclu<iin� Ja�anese Tre� Lilac, Colurrua�r Crab Apple and Clurnp River Bircl� aze
also ss�sattered throughou� the site. The Columnar Crab Agple line the Pat�ing lot delineators ta
the west of th�e Embassy Suites Hot�l and are located on �e rn>rth side caf th� Embassy Suite and
the north side o� the praposed futvre hotel building. Japanese Tree L,ilac ar� to the �ast. of the
I Embassy �uites and the east of the new pmposed hotel while the Clump River Birch are
prirn�ly lo�te�l in island are�s tv the west of the buildings. Uver IO2 pc�ints for shrubs are
provid�+d inc�udiia�g cc3mpa+ct Amer�ica�n Compa�ct Vibe�nw�n, l'Viout�t Airy Fc�thergi�lay Russi�n
Cypress, n Mc�und Alpan� Cwrrant, and Rose Pavement Foxi. A� nat�l �reveously, a
decorative fenc� c�f 3'l� to 4� ft. in h�ight made up of brick piers a�ad coatetl `paiymer fencc will be
provi�ied all alc��g the n�rth and west where the gre�n strip is less than 1 S ft, in width. This fence
rnust be lc�ca�� within tbe PmpertY line and not wander into the public right c�f way.
BUILUIl�TG
I The applica�nt has submitted bt�ixdi�g elevations of the propuseci Emb�y Suite�, eight story
lauilding. The buildiug �ctexior wil� be primazily brick of tt�r� co�ors in v�rying sb,a+des af
I brovrn. An EIFS wail syst�tn will be parovided a�aw�d the top p+artior� c�f tl�e bui;ld�ng as well as
around the �itst floc�r az� coniainin� the en�nce, restau�ant, ��bby �d pool ar��s. The entrarice
ta the builc�ing will be �n th� sc�utli sitie witb a canopy extendi�g out ov�r a �Y P��B�
pick up and drup of� area,
Pa�e 4
LIGHTII�G/TRASH
1'l�e applicant t�as not submitted a tigl�ting plan indicatin� faot cax►dles far IiP,htir�g proposed f�rr
the site. �ection 35-712 af the City (�iinanc�s requires that all ext:erior ligh�ng be provided
rxriitth l+ens�s, refle�tors or sha<ies sc� as to cflncentrate illwnination c�n the proPertY. I�l ti4n is
not pern�ittc�d at an int�sity 1eve1 gt�ater than 10 foot candles measural at pmp�rty lines abutting
street right of way or non-residcntial property. No glare is allowed ta te firom or be vis�ble
beyend #he bound�ries af the illwninated premises. It is not ant�cipat+�d tha� lig�ttin� should be a
prahl�m with r�pect to this plan. The aPPlicant should, howev�r, provide an appropnate
lighting plan ft�r review prior tt� the issuance of building perrnits for the pm,je,�t. N� trash
container area i� shown on the site plan as well. Ther� is a scrvrice t�r�d lea+�ing to the west side
af th� Emba�.sy Suites buiitiin� wh�.�re it is as�ssumed that t�rash pick �xp amd deliveri�s tv the site
will be �camplished. The applican# shou}d ve�rify that t�as� witl b� cvnt�ained whally within t�e
buildi�,g and that #here is n� ne� for a screening �closed area far ��sh. If this asswnnption is
incorrect, the plan should be �ncydifi�l to show the 1c�cation ofar� aF�srogri�t� trash container.
PItUCEDL1�tE
,As pc�int� out previously, this proposal is an amendm�nt to the Flanned iJnit Deve�opment
approval granted on June 27, 24}QS far a then 250 room ho�1,14U seat restaura�nt, water garlc and
connection tv the Ear�e Bmwn H�ritage Center. As a Plann+� Unit Dev+�ictpment azn�nci�CCnent,
the proposal is r�uu�d to follow the proceciures follow�ci for the onginal Planned Unit
Deve�opment, 'This re�ui� public hearing, which has been sci�+�3ul+�i. Notices of t�te
Planning C+ammissi+an's consid�ra.tian have been sent and notice� also have bt�n publish� %n th+�
Brooklyn �+�ter SunlPost, All 'u► all, we believe the plan is cc�n�istent v�i�th the original
deve�opment plaan a�pmval and sho�ld be authorizeci as an aznendment to allow a twQ'phase
dev�lvpment of.a +eigh# story, l75 rocrm liotel, I OQ s�at restaurant and physical conn�tiot� to �e
Earl� Brown �i�rita�e �Ce�ter under Phas� I aud Phase II�'or futur� c�evelc�prnen� a�' a h�tel sit�.
L'�evel+�pment ofPhase II wi11 req�ire an amcndment #o t�e �'la�cd Unit Ih.wele►p�n+e�t apProval.
There arrc mratte�s to be resoiv� sucb as acceptable p' g �ment fc�r the property and
submissir�n vf a phatc�metric plan, Appmval of this applicatit�z� shc�utd ack�wledge th� findi�gs,
considerations a�i c�nditions thk�t are campazable to those made at the time the City Counci]
a�Pro�ed the ori� Plann�i Unit Devclopment. A dra� PI Conunission resolufiion is
of�'erecl for the G� ion's +r��sideration. This resolu�c�n outlines the �c�mmission's
consideratior� c�f the matter and also re�ammended considerations fc�r a�prov�l:l.
Page 5
�iiri
�I��irl�ii
J11111�1 �11 �i���l illl i��� �1���
�����r�r
��s���o� ��i
��11111 1111 WS� 1111 111 �1 i
x
111 1111 /11
Ifi��ii�'i�l 1111 111
I 11111111 I111 IIi i��■
����+�++7 1111 1�: 11111
:f ��t��e ♦11� 1��: 11111
1111� Il�il��' �I111
_,t� ��;tiiii� I���)1111�
fi
=�A 11
R�
I
f
1 1
n-
'c.
y
`"`t �l i��'�?I�i-�""�f7r,_c7 14�iti''!�
'A3R iT.�.� �9
I I
1
��.r �I
LOGISMap Outpu# Fage Page l of l
,�x
w
r �rar.�r►�sr�waooE
h#tp.11�i�.lo�is.org��,t�.;r�� A�Il�+IS/ims?ServiceName�bc L+4G�S�+iap t3V&!����nt"�t�ic�.,. A/171�t�7'
�'�ty c�f Brot�klyn C'enter
A Mallennium Community
MEMt?RAlVDUM
DATE; Apr�l 23, 2U07
TOc R.on Watren, Planning and Zoning Specia[ist
FItOMc Todd Blomstrc�m, Director of Public Wcrrks '"��'�7
SUB,TECT: Prelzrninary Site Plan Review
Planning Commission Applications 2407-Ot?8
Emhassy Sui#es Hotel
Public Works Deparlment staff reviewed the following pretiminary documents submitted for
review under Planning Commissian Application 2007-U(}8 for the praposed Ernbassy Suites
Hotel I3evelopment Siie,
Sh�et Cl.t�. Topvgraphic Survey, dated January 3Q, 2{�Q7
Sheet C2.0. Uemolition Plan, dated March 26, 2001
Sheet C3.0: Grading and Erosion ConkraI Plan, dated March 26, 2007
Sheet C4.U: Utility Plan, dated March 2b, 2UQ7
Sheet CS.�: Gec�metric Plan, dated March 2�, 2007
Sheet C�i.4: Givil Details, dated March 26, 20t�7
Sheei C?.0: St�rmwater Pollution Prevention Plan, dated March 26, 2U07
The applicant is prc�posing #o develop property consistin� of Lot 1, Btoek l, BrQOklyn Farm
Addition This property is curre�tly open vacant land adjacent to the Ear1e Brown Hentage Center.
Public Warks sta�recommendS that the following conditi�ns of apprc�val be adopted by the Flanning
Coammission and Gity Gouncil for Planning Commissicrn Application 2047-U08.
1. EASEMENT �EDI�AT`IUN
Community I)evelo�ment staff �ave indicated that the proposed dev�lo�meni site will be subdivided
by recc�rt�ing vf a sul�ivision plat. The proposed subdivisic�� plat wQUld provide two s�parate Iats
c
for the two proposed hotel sites. A preliminary plat has not been prepare�d at this tirne, The prvperty
emen 1 Q fe�t in widih alon alI r bmundaries
uwner shall dedicate a draina e and utilit eas t, P��'
g Y
and riedieate a draina�e and utility easement over all portions af ihe storm water d�tention pond
c hotel ra The draina e and utilit easetnent documents shall be executed and
within th rtY g Y n
P
rr�cc�rded �vith Henttepin County prior to issuance of a building pearrni#�
&31�1 .5hingl� �reek F'ark�vay Recrc�atior� and Community Cent�r f"hane cY: TU17 Number
Brooktvn Center, MIV 55�Sf1-2I �9 (763) 569-34(1D
Caty Hal� TDI) l�lumher (?63) 569-3�0(3 FAX (?6�3) 5�9-34��4 Pa� 1 of4
FAX (?S3) 569-349�1
www.cityo}tarvoktync�nter.vrg
2. SITE GAYUUT
The Gevmetric �'lan prvvides a tayout of th� proposed site impravements. A to�tal of five entrances
�e propased it�r the �ite consistin� of the comman souChem driv�way entrance witb the City-Caunty
Federal �redii Union Buitding, three new entrances atan� Earrle Brown Dnv�e, an� the common
northern driv�r�vay entrance wit� the Earle Brown Heritage Center.
A. The praposed �ite layout shov�+s parking areas adja�ent ta �arte Brown Drive with essentially
ncs set�ck frorr� the praperty baundary in many lc�c�►tions, Potions of th� p�rking lt�t and
curbi�g ap�aar to encro�h int� the public streeC right-of way, All aurbing and paved
surfaces for tYie prc+p+�sed development site sha�l have a r�unimum �f c�ne-foot setback from
�tc property bQUndary adjacent to the public street (ex�lu+ding the c3riveway entrances).
1'arking l+at encroachments into the pubtic right-of-way sha11 b� elimix�ted from Yhe plans.
B. Parking l4t sgaces and drive lane dimensians s�aall +camply with the minimurn d�si�n
stanc�rcis pravided in �ity �rdinance Sectian 35-7U2.
C. 'Tt�e prvposed driveway access points along Earle Brown Driue conflict �with �xisting street
lights io�ated a�long the street bouievard. The Developer shall relocate the existing street
li�ht units and tr�es in accordance with City standards at the Deveioper's expense.
Engineerin� pl�ns for street light relocation work shall be submitted to the Public Works
I)eparixrient for review.
2. PUBLIC UTII.TI'X SEitViGES
The proposed d�veloprnent �ite is currently served by publie w�ter s�pply and sanitary sewer wit�°iin
Earle Brawn thive. �Vater service is available from a 10-inc�i diameter water nnain� along the western
gorti�n af Earle Brown I?riv� at�d a 12-inch diameter water �rt�in a�ong th� z�arthern partion of Earle
Brown Drive. A. 12-inch diameter sanitaiy sewer was installed along the western portio� of Earle
Brown Utive during the 2046 cc�nstruction season.
A. T'he total ma�ci��um discharge rate to the public sanitary sewer system from the site
�inclt�ding bath. hot�l huildings) shalt not e�cceed 425 �allans per minute under ar��
circumstaTtces. The app�ieant shall provide sanitary se�we� p�ak �ischaz�ge calc�latians for
bo� buildings. 'T�+�se catculations shall be in written report form and certified by a iicensed
Pmfessional �:ngineer. A buildin� permit for th� pmposed cievelopment sha11 n+ot be issued
until sufficien# evidence is pmvided regarding compliance with sanitary sewer peak
di�chaige litnitations.
tem +�n Earle Brown I3rive in
w f the water s al
B. The a lica�t shall cvnduct fire fla testin o
PP 8 Y�
ta to ths �it
the precsence c�f Public Ut�irty staff. 'T'he appl��ant shall prc�v�de suf�`icient da y
Building t?f�ci�1 tc� d+�ument the extent of fire flow eapacity fbr the proposed building.
G. Sanitary s�wer manb��les shall be placed near th.e righ�-of-way alang alI sewer services
�rving the praposed resta��anr� or other central kitch�n facilities.
T?. The sanitary s++�ww�r �xvice extendin� from SSMH 1 shall be reduced tca an �-inch diameter
pipe �o reflect t�e req�irements of Item A above, un�ess tt►e applicant submits supporting
infarnnatit�n sl�owing th�e necessi#y for a 10-inch d�arneter sewer s�rviee.
Pa�c2 of4
E. �'�re and domesti� water services st�all be sepaxated prior to entering the buildings. Domestic
and �ire services slaall have separate exterior gate valves ar PNs to a�lr�w isolation of
individ�al r�vater servic+� lines.
F. Tracer wire and tracer w�re a���s bcsxe$ shall be installed along the proposed sanitary sewer
ser in ac�orciance with City stantlards.
G. Utility service extensior�s sha11 meet City of Brooklyn� Center design sta�zciaards. The Ic�ation
and methnd of c4nnectian tc� the existing water and sanitary sew�r mains shall be subje�t co
�PPT�va by t�e City Engineer and Supervisor af F'ublic Utilities.
H, The propc�sed hydrant locati4ns are subject eo ihe approval af the City Fire Ghief and
B�►ilding Official.
1. The Applica�t sha�l be responsihle for coordin�ting siie development plans wiih Xcel
Ene�+, Ce�terPc�int Energy, Q�west Communicati�ns and other private utitity �ompanxe�.
J. fihe app�icant shallpay City and Metropolitan Cauncil s�nit�ry sewer cotxzxection charges
and City water coz�n�tit�n charges for the praposed buildiz�g units.
3. TItAFFIC
In 2C�5, #he City hired a�raffic eonsultant to perform a firat�"ic Imp�ct Study for the prapPc3sed hotel
dev�lopment pmject, The Traffi� Tm�act Study investigated the projected tra�c vol�ammes that would
be generatcd from the proposed hotels, The sh►dy provided an analysis af the tr�ffic op�ration within
the ia�terse��ion ofEarle Brc�v�m I�rive and Summit Drive b�ssed on projected traffic gravvth,
The 2UU5 tra#�ic stud�y was based on a total of 225 hotel rooms and a I50 seat restaurant. The current
developrnent plan consists of 25fl hotel rooms and a lU0 seat restaur�nt. This mcxlificatian in room
count and res#auraait size does nat substantiaily change the result� of the traffic study. A co�y +of the
T�ra#fic �pact �tudy is attach�d to this memarandum.
4. GRADING, I3RAiNAGE ANI3 EROSI4N CONTROL
The applic�nt is proposing a cambi�t�on of storm drain�ge pipes, drainage swales, infiltration (rain
ns) and ex�ar�sit�n of t#�� existing storm water pand to manage surface water runoi�' f+�r th� sii�.
i M�na ement Gommissi�n on
h' e re�k Wat�ersh�d
The drainage plan was approv�d by the S angl C g
7.
A ril 12 Z(Ml
P
A. Gra�iing limi#s shall t�main within the property boundary unless forn3al arrangetnents have
been� made with adjacent pr�perty awners.
B. The Cirading I'lan shall be amended to show an emer�ency overflovv route far the stormwater
pot�d to Earle Brown Drive. The emergency overflaw path sha11 be a minirnum af two feet
belaw the finisheci floor elevation of both hotel buildings.
Pa�c 3 0#'4
G. fihe G�rading Pl�n shall be amended ta show the narn�tal water level and 100�-year high water
Ieve1 for the pon�.
D. 'T�e Aevelt�per sh�ll install an impervious g�textil� ar clay liner within the pond expansiun
area to minimize the amc�unt of infiltratian from the pond.
E. 'l he storm water pand curr�nily ontlets through 2U-ft long subm�rged pipe lead, 'Th� Utility
Plan shhall be amended tp include r�moval and r�instaitatic�n of' the existin� autlet pipe lead
and installat�on af a gipe �}aron set at the normal water ele�atian of 84U,0.
F. Ti�e property c�wner of the proposed developament sliart enter into ar� Agxee�nerct far
Mainten�nce and Ins ection o Utili and Storr� Drairtc� e Syst�ms with the City �f
T�
P .1� �1'
Brookl Cent�r to insure the continued mainiena,�c� c�f on-site utiliti�s and sturrn w�t�r
Y�
faciiibies.
The a1�ve comments are provided based on the infarmatian submitted by the a�plicant at the tirn� of
this reviev�r. "ubsequent apprc�val of th+e final plat and site glans may require addirional modifieations
based o�t engin�ering requirements associated with final desi�n of th� water supply, starm drainage,
sanitary sewer, finai grading and geametric design as establis�ed by the City Engineer and other
publie c�#�i�ials having jurisdiction aver approval of the final sit� plams.
Page 4 of 4
0���7���J� CX /'''��.7�7�V�!"i���.7
TRf►NSP{}FiTA71 tV R PEANNERS
t�N E t�INEE S AND
10417 EXt�LSEOR BOULLEVVARD, SURE TWO HOPlClt�tS. NIN 553431(952) 236-1�37 t FJ4X {�j 23$-i671
Apri16, 2�5 itefer tv Fil�: 05-24
���v�,��rnu�€
TO: Todd Blocnstram, City af Brooklyn G r
FRQM: Edvfracd F. Terhaar and David C. Ma�y
RE; Results of Traffic Impact Study for the Pmgosed Hotel Near the E�rle
Brc3wn Center
FURFflS�
The purp�se +�f this memorandum is to present results �f c�ur tx�`ic i�ct study for �a
prt� hot+e� and resta�►nt near the E�rle Browar C�t�er in Brooklyn �mter,
M' ta. Our work ta date has involved an estimatic�n c�f th� number of trips generated
by th�s develop�nt and tl�e determination of imp�acts on surrouading roadway
n�tvwork.
BACICGRUUND IIYF+QRM.�TIOPf
I.c�a�on t�haracteristics
The site for the prc��se�d hc�tel and restaurant is located on tt�e e�st side of Earle Br�wn
Drive, nc�rth of Sumnnit Drive and essi of Shingle +Creek P�rkway, as sl��w� in Fi�u� 1.
Tt�e EE»rrle Bruwn Genter is locat�+d farther to the north+east on Earle Br�wn Drive east of
the �ievelopm�at site. pffice builciing� are located on th� west side c�f �arle Bcc�wn Urive
opposite the devel+�pment site. Access to a shoppin,g center (featurin� a Tar$et) �s located
south of Sunn�a�t I}rive ite Earle Brown Ihive.
aPpos
I
r j
�'��+K 11 �AYE,, i k�f� 3t �_A4�tl x�*f� ��c �t�i
_.Jk j u�a. C*`^'� FfC� t� ._.a. y 3I i aYE. idt. i.
j i�l�.._ .y r V p j
L a j/ J itri
"'sl�''S 4I �,.'f r� A� t f j `t {:+nii*
y y� y
�i�n l� �f. "9 d y ..'"�M�
t
Y;;::".. �t Y1i�t :wi �Cli� i �'I..
#M %EftSt�S x xi t
c_r. �'"s�.a .a� f��...
t I r�r lk �A1i� 2 a tY y °�w'��`�-,..°�-:;;., l �'i f
n �T ay y w
f �a a�i I
�t� "k.Nl 1f1t#CEN#�AV�. ;n
r. �o a t 4�
.V�.. �+1.. k RY
''i m
��f y
i
Ij Rt
p
.�1111i,�+�t i �����i�, l �,,�i i
r��
c�
h!lSSEi ilt/E. l `a�. �r
w
tal ff n
r .ex.
��i.�� '��t l#tlEi. x""� t J r CN 1'i�i`
s
1 d�.t�; gV��
f�IYER p i "''"s"�1 f ►tr i t�W 1tz� .,'vt
y F 7 a
M
�,�1� 6+
�j r,'i� �'�i. i i� �A1iki1.lt7! k Vl
f m l�
n j �A,� ��..t� jr j
p. R_.._�' a l,,.�..' f u.. o�. t-�w e���I ♦Yt.
y a'
r Mi f�
fl !t y 7 �H t i j�y
.....,-M4f4tIt�K N 7 .,.��.a�JF.� �..1 �!i# 1�� x. *b Ad#!k p4
�y a C
a c E� �vt ;�S
�k1YI �...._�1 `�t` _n1�4 AVf4 S",.......,'�iY11M'e AYf� 4
a� ts�,r. l c
E n. W GiitA AV4..
�..+1#�'� ti. ti`�� ,-.�..It� 1 i1 R ",�aw z aas I �l r.
ClRAitU 1 ��AVE. n l, M ��i"` AY� �RR� N �AVf� ii�. #e11NT 1..--HfkEt��1I:. L v
l�"' ��,1
1.���
t�
�v�
tt�
*-,�...�..,.,,7 �dt �AVE�. ��`"'�i�' K" _.fif.,,.w,. �SY'f r.r�t...
�t tn�c,��� .,f€� r. M..
n ��ae�
x
+C ..W py �V�. i
ttk:FA1�C �r' �,ilY[r ��....�,._�4w-.•� C �C�l�l� R! 1"� .y
y� y n4i 4_ AVC. �^::::..y v��
aAA*��x N �Ew 'I�'� p. x
�Na
1, C�
I C�"�
q n
�p IL°..� �att.�� txut�.... xv�,
iD
m N
r, c� m ,4�,
il
»JI_.����..ft _...,..,.jl.,.�..»--� ,,�r""'."x:,, �r,�i9';
,�+M Z; tttao�yE �,y ($`I`� f
'_,,v_ r
,;,,,3 '�J�`ft� f. �.�„�a,, m r r„ c.i I�r�u 4 i5
4
�n""„ r RFVERM��1►� ���t'-�.
i+ w'" t eti�.` te ��p��.E R63.
11N.CQ�f LA.�P'��^" _.r"' eY� �ei °'�l
Mr, Tc,dd Blc�mstr�,nn -3- Aptil b, 2t1U5
Develc�nment Cbarscteristics
'T'�e ru sed s�evelo m
p� ent consists af a 225 roam hc��tel anri a Y S4 seat r�staurant within
P
the hotel. An indoc�r water park is also planued for the Pzop�rtY, hciwever, the us� of the
vvater park is projected t� be exetusiue to hotel guests {no additional vehicie trips are
g�nerated). Access to t3�� development will tx prr��id� via tu+o exclusive driveways
from Et��l� Brown D�ive, with �e-ins provided to two existing driveway� frorn Earle
Brown Ih�iv�. Figure 2 shows the proposed development site pl�r►..
�xisting It.c�dwav Cl�azacteristics
Summit D�ive, Earle Brown Ih�ive, and tlu Targe# �hc�prping ce�ter accces,s interse�ct st a
four-way int�rsect�on apptoxinnately 500 fcet east of Shingle Crr�ek Faxk�way. The
I intersectian is curre�tly cz��arolled by swp signs fc�r southbownd traf�ic on Earlc Brown
Lkive and for nc�rthbound tra�c exirin� tt�e Targei shoPPing center. The eastbound
appnoaeh of Sum�ni� Drivs �as a dedicated right t� Ia�ne, a through lane, and a shareci
throughi'te�t-tum la�te. The w�stbaund approach af Summit Drive has a shared
through/ieft�turn l�ne aa�d a share� through/right-turn lane. T�ie sauthbound appraach
Earlc Brc�w� Lhive and the northbaund apgroach of thc sl�c►pping cenier acces�s° each have
de�dieat�l right-t�ni lane and a sharad through/'teft-hun lan�e. Sumrnit I}rive has a
posted speEd limit of 35 m�th.
E�s��'Traf�c Valumes
Ir� c�rci�r tc� detetmine the baseline traffic volumes, tutrnin$ movement coturts were
conducted on Thursday, N�rch 14, 2005 from 7:U0 .A.I�t to 9:{�1 AM and Froffi 4:� PM w
i5;� Pl�?t. fih� resulting existing volumes recorded thxaugh these cvu�ats are preseniecl
later in this rep4ct.
T'RAF�'IC FURECASTS
Traffic f�recasts w�rc es�abiiab�d fur existing ccn�i�io�s, tl� y�ar 2fl07 with oniy
ba�k�und growth {"no-build" condition), and the y� 2Q07 ari#� deve�o t trips
�`*build" condiiinn), °t'he traffic farr.�a�sts consist af exisiing i�ff�c vo back��zui
grrswth, and n�w dev�l+oprnent tti�s. Trip gencration rates foz all in #�e area w�
esit�►btished ba�ed on data prese�d in the seventh e�iirion nf�p Gcnezatic�n (20U3),
publist�+d by t� Institute of Transportation En
d
I
vy ,��z
I
t
I �MO a�T�M,u
i
r
t,
.4
1iN�lY+Mf�
irx x
11�L1011Mp11�liaY!( r..��
7t+070l0. R. i
t
r.�.`.., ."k.,�wieto+►�wt�ia�j
».w
�l i
«t� 1 9
a
y
s...
i:_
x
i.
C�"-- 4� y
F
a+., v
�y
i�i�� 6'R ����'i i i'11'1� �V 1�'L�7 ��ii fi
!'"�'1V1' V� i
�Q� �i�.l��f7
I
Mr. Todd Bl�mstmrn -5- April 6, 2A{}5
l�e�elc�nment T�i� Gen�ratirn�
Table 1 pt�esents tl�e rr�suttant trips generatcd by th+e development duning the weekt�ay
AM peak haur, �nd Table 2 presents tbe resultant trips genexated by the developme�t
durin� the we,eicday PM p�eak hour.
Table 1
WeekdAy AM Peak Aonr Trip Ge�eratloa
Adjuste�d
i Grass Trivs Grc�ss Trit�s New T'rivs Pass-B TX ri�
t1s� Sizz� In I Ouc In i Cxut In 9 Out in i 4ut
x�� ���n�� �o,� 1 z2s ��o,� I» I ag 1 r� 1�� rr as I o I
a�#�y I�so s� 2�_ i� x l� a z 2 I o� o
�rc�°r�:!t: �9 I s� I�� I s� �s► I sa o� o
Table 2
We�lcday PM Pe�alc Huur Trip Geaeratio�
Gross Tri�s Grass "C��_ New� Pass- Tn�
Us�e Size I In Oui in Uut in Out In Qut_.
Hatc! Mectin� Rooma 1 225 Rooms 7fl 63 �'70 63 10 63
_r.
_..�u� it3+ Re�kaurant 1 S0 26 i� 13 9 i 9�` l fl 15 1 �._.�4 2
TOTAL 9� 76 i 89 "f3 8S 71 4� 2
It is expeet�ecl t1�t a percentag� of tbe gross vehicle trips $e�+erated by #he rr�staurant will
c�ccur ini��rnal #o the site (i.e., fic>m the l�t�el to the resta:uaat and vice-v�rsaj. A
reducti�n of 2S°!u was applicd to the gross vehicle t�ips for the tesia�rant durit�g tt� PM
1�ur. "i'�e a�djusted trip� generatod by the develc�pment sit� can be classified
in� �rn� of �e fotlowi�ag triP types:
Idew Tcips Trips so�edy w and from the sui�je�ct c�v�lopment
s Pass-By Trips Existiang thro�gh trips on Surnmit iarive that will iaciude a s#op st t#�e
devel�gm�n# sit�
Frnr PM hour ori�ps generated by tbe restaurant, 80°✓Q of th�e trips generated wer+e
t�t�rmine+d w be new trips, anc120% were determined to be p�-by trip� &+om Snmmit
Drive, Fur AM hc�ur re�tauramt t�nrips and all hc>t�l trips, all trips were determined to
be a�w trips.
Mr. Toctc� �t�mstrarn -6- April 5, 2IX35
Dire.ctionat Distri�utian af Tri�
In �eneral, new tr'rps �ene�ated by the development w�i11 be distribut�d as fo�laws;
7�%o to/&om west on SumFr��t ihive towards Shingle Gre�k Parkway
1 S°lo toJ&om east on Stimmit I}rive towards TH 1 Ot�
5°1� tolfrom the 'Target s�c�pping center
tolfr�m Esrie Hrawn Drive towards the �rle $rowrt Genter
�'�ss-by t�rs �erieratec� by #he developrnent are expecte�d tc� b�e distribut� as follows:
6S% firnn W�3 Swnmit Utive
35°10 fram �B �ummit Dtive
Backstrnund Growth in Traffic Valumes
firat�ic volu�nes on Sumrnnt T�rive are expected to increase regardless of the pro��d
developcnent cf�e to continuin� growth in the area B�S� Qz! t�iC txi0$t I�GCIIt SY�tI�3C�
daily volum� cowrrts in the azea, ti�rough votumes oa �umxt�it I�rive wers ir�crease�3
by 2°Jo per year in or�ier to a��aunt for such growth in traffic vc►lumes by the yc�r 2{�?7.
Total Prc�iect�d 'i'raffic VQtumes
A#�er accounting far existir�g volua�s, backgrocu�d valu�ne growth, and volum�es due ta
the proposed development, we have prepared the tatal volume forecas#� shown i� Fi�ur�
3. This figure shows the prajected weekday AM and PM peak ��ur tr�t�c volumes for
e�ch of the fotlawing scen�uxos:
Existing Conuditia�s
2QU7 N�r-Build {hack�,round Craffia growBn)
2UU7 Buitd (b�ckground traffic growth plus develo�nent trig$)
p
NrQ7' 1f8
����1��
T
-a
3
r
r
i.KIIG7` ��,�47�
XXf�Ct/f�X
N
��st
a
41l4't/�
9!�/i�181
2q� �EI�#'M�3
2�7'1�BR�.O
�lXX
BRLiOKLYN {:E1�iTFR TRAFFlC $TUt�1( FtN� YI���,�#�"
R'�� �/VrYY� f�!
�#�1. i
����l��
Mr. Tc�d Blomstrom -8- April 6, 2U05
TRAFFIC Al�lALY�IS
TI� intersectian af �ummit Drive snd Earle Brown flrive was analyzed ta determine th�
impaccts of traffic generat�ed by the propos�ed hotel �nd restaurant development, Ca�ity
analyses v�ere p�rfarmerl using Highway Capaciry Saftw�re (H�S). 'I'h� results are
present�d in terms af level af service (L(?S), wt�ich range fram A tc� F. Lt3S A represents
the l�esc imt�rs�ctian c�per�tia�, v�ith very little delay fc�r each vehicle usit�g the
intersec�io�, I.OS repre�ents tiie worst intersGCtion opera�ion wi� e�tcessive delay,
The LUS results are shawn in Figure 4.
t?ur�ng the v�re�kday AAri pea�tc hour, both approach�s �f Summit �,}rive c�perate at L�S A
under all �three sc+enarios. Right hurns from both the saU.thbc�und Earte B�'nwz� Dmive
appro�ch and the northbount� shopping center appraach o�ate at LOS A under �Ii three
scenarios, while northbQ� a�xi sauthbaund left t�u�ns and #hroug� movetnents operate ai
LC.�S C u�nder a�ll t�ee s�enarios. Durin� the AM peaGk hcrur, all movements operat� at
acce�table levels of s�n+ice under all thrce ssccet�rios.
Duri�n� the rueekday PM peak hour, both approaches o�' Summit I7rive op�rate at LOS A
under a1� ihre�e scenarins. Ri�tt #urns from the southbound E�rlc Brown Drive appxc»cch
�oper�te at LOS B u�der ali tt�ree scenarios. Through movements a�td 1eft turns frorn che
saut�bound �arle Brown Driwe approach operate ac LOS C uncl�er exi�tting conditaons and
the 2{�17 no-build scenaria, and LQS D under the 2(�1? bui1�3 �cenarin. �i.ight �iun,s from
�tae nczrthbound shopping center approach operate �t Lt'JS A wnd�r a�ll �ce sccnarios.
Left ax►d th�rough moverner�ts from the noithbouz�d shoPping center �pprra�+ch
c��a�ate a� LUS C under e�stir�g canditions, LOS I� under th�e 20U? no-build s��aario,
an�i LC3S E undcr the 2+�7 build scenario.
During the we,�lcday PM �eak l�our, the northbound and sauthbound left iurn a�►d fi�hrough
movem+ents ear�erietice inc �ielays due to the backgrQUnd growt�i and urips
gen+crated by the pco}�osed d+cvelopmcn�. While the ic�creas�ad dc�ys will m�ke these
mavernents less desarable, it is our apinion that motorists will nc�t find th�se mr�vements
overly difficult or Ratl�r, motorists will nee�d to waat slig�tly l+�nger h+�fore
an acceptarble gap u� �ffic to enoer onto S�arnit Drive. I� addition, traffie
�xiting th� Target site have oth�r access alternati�res availabie.
N
NC� 9CN�
e?�� NA/A
NA/A
uaA
a���n
��z
�c�u�
NAIJ►
1 l�
�N� �i T
uaf�a
��Z
�r �u�
aa�x
F��U�
8�'#t�3KL"Yl�i +GEi+�I'�R TAAFFiC STUDY FO� y��K�AY
#�POSEp A.�A�A. At�D P,1�l.
��N�� ��t3�'t�s, �tC. H4TEt. Sf't'E PEA1� HI�iUR
L��1.S t� 33Efi�E
Mr. Todd Blomsttom -I0- Aprit 6, ZU45
C4NCLUSIO1�iS AlVT11�ECt3�4IMENDATIONS
Based on the �nalys�is presented in this report, we ha�e carrclud�i ihe fc�llowing,
•'T'ke proposed �iotel and restaurant development are estiznated tcs generate i 30 t�rip�
dunn� ttt�e weekday AM p�s�k h�ur arid 162 trips drxring w�kday PM pealc h�ur.
i�uurin� the week+d�y AM peak hour, all turneng movement� fram bakin diarec�ions �f
�um�it Drive �s tla€e western interse.ction with l�arle Bre�wn Tlrive rape�tate at L�5 A
under existin� conditic�t�s, the nabuild scenario, and past-d�vetc�pn�ent
build�u#. Left turns a�d thrvugh mov+ements fri�m Esrle Brovv� Urive and'-from the
Tar�et shuppin�, centee operatc at Ll3S C undec all thr�: sce►narias; ri�ixt tau� �perate
at Lt?� A.
Duriz�g the weekday PM geak hour, all turning maveinents frorn both directions of
Sumanit Uriv� at ths w�stern intersection with Farle Brown Thive +aperate at L4S A
undsr �xasting conci�tiions, the no-build scenar`tc�, atu� ur�d�r pt�st-c�evelopment
buildout. LeR tu�cns and ttuou$h moveme�ts appraachix�g Summit Drive &om Earle
B�rawn Drive o}�rate at Lt�S C under existing condirit�ns and th� no-bu�d s�enaria;
th�e rnQVements operate �t L4S D under post-cievelopm�nt build cunc�icron�. L�eft
t7urns a�d thrc�ugh movements a�raaching Sum�it Urive from the T�r�et shopping
center operate at LC3S C u�ader e�sting conditio�s, L,�S D unc�r the nabuiid
sc��ria, and LC}� E u�d�r posi-development build r,�tiditians,
s We aa�e confident the sub�;je�t intersec#ion will i� �blc to adequately accorn�date tha
traffic �en�rated by the proposed deveiopment. The existing two�way swp cc�ntrol a�t
thc inter�ecion will function adsquat�ly under the post-development buald condition.
-iAt �l c lu {�st :r�a 1f�.. �Y 9 --..1 Ils�' 1 s 1 H;1 .•e 1�
�..s,t�:e'�.4��
f I,i
I t 1' i i i 1
1 i! f i 1 1'
��1` s�� ���un r i�a I 1 i ��w• 1�
,R i i) {i' �'�1t i;v I�.S i 1 ltt� t•
e�c -e t i •'s't� ae': a i i,r �er r .i.. a u
t �y .:i o i �M 1 i e M
�t'� MU�rt�' .,y II' .Y 4! Itt' IR�, t ty II'. '4t� i I'.
s .�F �1! t t�'��'H�a4i �1 i�l �i t II AI I,i 1 a+s IIY. 9 9f�'. �s;
i� i i 1 Fa •.;a s� ei tt� rr� It
k�� 4!' 1�1 /lr' 1 IYi�I ':5;� ��M'.. �f M'. 1' I M' i 1 1
s tl��.<.� :+k' r.1.4s ��t ��11�♦ 1 if i #.If ��6 f� •'9 IK' 1, 1 F
.:1r t p
#:�1' �r r, i�� {n�� ttt� W e r M F
i l i s •'r �t� t �u�� �'i a r i! i t rt i l 4
!�1" t i i�. ��.a �f t 1 t 1: i
�i t��...:� w,•
�'J4' r��, t� �u'�,.� r ���r'���,-�tF
t `-F{ 1 i,.n: �Ilt.k�i �rM �r� 1 k y+' i'i f 'ti !'0 .•�s �.i I
i.: s ts e s i v: s or ec� e! II r�►�i i.
t i Ir: 1 ��!'l91: #1 r:i ll .:MI i 1 il 4.1 i' tr: �Y i�lltt���
1�: t ��.�i�i i11 0�` It !I Y �Mi`/t lt��,.�I 1.i f
�.R.� �s��` i r�� E� li�: d 4 mq:
i t i -t�4i �r�'� t /!h 1 1 er �r..� t�� t� t
1, (i. M i�` Kt .t .f. :.N�il i
y {ti"�f f 11 •"ill�': 1 i 1 i�: ;1�' 1�: i: 1! i�.k-'
1'. 11 1�. ���.«1 1 1 ��'�'Ii�. I i 1� •�t 1,' ��4 1� 1'
r e�..�s t �'��n��.��� p�,. i 1 t �ti'�
t a •���t�� t tt �s�: ►t s r��
t� i1CH�. t s tfl -ti Y '!i �...M i! 1.� it��'�:�� •�.d �t rf 1
i'� 7 i i"•
RE.S�C}I.►UT�f,)i�T NO. 20Q5-97
�Th� u at� of` t�c pr�rpat�► �a pmpo�cl ua�cr t�e �T� �re�
Raos�g i� �can�ifdetred a r�abk use af tt�e Prt�ertY strd will cunfiQr�n �tth
t�rdin�ace �arde e�t fat stlowi�g a g�a �rip slcrng t2� Esrl Arown Ihivc
rtg,l� af way tb�t ia kaa thaa 1S !t. Tl�s mc�d�f�atioa fr�m tl� C1A a�i�a�ce
�aadsrd #s ,�ifi�d on t6+e baaia of t�e d�� plau bc.� �uu ,apprc�n�e
p�t for t�ia arGa sad that it ia off set mi�i�d lr�r vai�ua ��a�
the apQrcived a� pl�n,
A�. "1"'he t�nit Devela�m�t�t pr+�o�al is cc�sid�d ca�ia� �+ith tbe
re�mmes�dations vf tl�e Cit3►'s Cosngr�ivc F�s� for this ar�ea of tt�c city.
T't�e Uuit I�w� Prc�ai a�g�c� W be a g+dc�d lcmg rang+e us� �f
tt�e e�ci�ng land an�i thia devetopm�t cam be crn�si�red an assc� ta the
�c�ttity.
b. In 1�►t +�f t3�e a1�+c w�i�cat��, h ia t�t�� t�t the {3u�Iit�s f�r
E�a1 R�.�:�,� as co�ainad in 35-?A8 �f the City's Z�m�tg
thdi�ace m�t aad tbc p�rapo�aE then:fcme, i�t tt�e hc� i�er�st of tfi�e
�.%ty.
HE IT F'tJRT�iER R.F.SOLVED t6e C' f:r�uic�l �f tt� City c�f Bra�k�iyn
�Y
t�at App n Na. ?C1Q�S-010 be ap�provcd aubject to che followusg c.��dit�ona and
coa�id�rati+�s.
2• `!'�C builcli�g pla�t arc �bjax to r�w�:vi► a�d ag�+v�l by chc Huifld�ng C}f�ciai
a►it� t+e� �o �licable cadea priar ut #�c �sauan�c oY p�ermits,
2. Gra+�ing, drai�g�e. utilitY at�d erc�ius� controt g� ar� �tject ravi�w and
val by tbe CitY En� Prior to th� i�sua�ce Qf
3. 4 A aiie �er€o�G and aa�pparting fit�anrMi�t guat�it�x in an to
be de�i�d �a1 c� a�st e�dm�a shall be �ul�mitped �r to tb�e issu� of
t�31di� permita w sssure cc»�rktioa af aU r+equired sfqe im�ncv�m�r�ts.
4, A awnimum 8-612 a�rb atrd gutter s�all �ie prrnritc�d arewn� a�l p�rlcing and
dri�+i�g ar�.
S. Any �uts�de trash an�d t�oft�p or cm mu
equip� sh�ll bc apprc�priatcly scr+xne� fi�m vi�w.
II ItES4L'[TTIt�N Np. �t'�5-97
6. 'I't�e b�tilcii�g shal:i bc ccg�i�ed wlth �n �matic firc cx�3n�t�is�g s�►,st�m to
me�et 1�FPA �tazYluda sad a�atl bt crnn� to d�:v�e
�rdat� wipth Cha�er S of the C�tj+ t)r�di�.
1. Utulergr� i�r,'�gati+an ah�il be �tallad `n� �11 la�sc:apad atcas to facilitate sitc
m�t��e.
8. �'laa s�rc►v�il ia +ac��hia�va af'sll aigne�y w2�ch is s�tb,ject to 34 of the �ity
C?rdinat�s.
9, Ti�e s�tic�t s�l �ub�t ur u built �aarr+cy c�f t�e ptoperty, improvam�s and
trtitity serv%ee �in� pr�r �a tbe reles�e flf t�e p�ar�ac�e gu�arants�e.
1�I. Al1 wa�c p�araa�d �nd �la us�d for c�asc��n af utilit#� ah�1 c+��rm
ta t�re �ity af Braak�►n Ce�r 3��ad�rd Specif"�catia�,s and Uc�ti1�.
11. Tho �lic� a�all gmvide ap t� �ioan c�ntmi cons�uctic�n as
a�v+�d b�' City Enginxri� DePert�n�t� a�f W�tain aa NFDFS cans�n
aioe e�icm co�rol ger�s�t frosa t�e Mitu�a�ota P+�Ih�tion C��mal Ag�cy pri� t�a
diatt�rbi�g the �i�.
12. T�e a�rl�ca�'� �tann wr�+er n�a�e� plan s�2t t�c a�rove�l by tt�e Slhingle
Cr+�c Wat�craherd I��aaa$cment Coa�s�on gr�r ta d�e i�� c►f "buitc�i�g
p� for �is �rc�Ct.
13. The a�l� shall cs�r iffio a PiJD agr+�cmr�r� vv�tth t2�e City of Hr+�olclyn C.
w be revitw+� and appravad by thc �i�y Att�rne�► �rt�Cn t� t� i��sa�:c of
t�uild'u�g pcarm�ta. S�t�d a� tac fi�+.d wi� the titic to t� gr��crt�+ and
a� ac�awkdg�e tt�e apxific modifscatios� ttrc G1A w�de�lyi� uaniag dia�iur�
as well as �r ccmdit� af approval. 'T�ae agr�met� �a11. fiu#� a�u�u�
r,t�npli�.vrc wittt t�e de�►cl�me�t pl�t�s submitt�d with t1a� application.
14. Thc dev�lt�menc plamt �all be nrodified ut t�e f+at�
a. T�a pmvid� a 3 sh to 4 ft. hi�h d�coruiv� f�e aio� t#�e ed�e nf the
Pr�perty l%nc abutting the Earl� H�►a Drive rigbt t�f w�y �t ar
mitigau t�e negative sapccc:tts af a r�cd�d .'T� 'vc
�nce �ll c+o�sut of co� pi�rs uid �+ro��t ir� ai�il�r t� it�ajt
I prQVidad at t�e 69'' and Bm�aalct�m �i1GVa�rd pm,�at.
g
�Y��Yi- ��i �VY�#!
b. A m�fi�ed pla� to be t�' wittt.� ape pomt
�Y� ��S 4I21anda�ca�e pai�s sad a prc�ar di�rib�tt3on of
pts�c�it� cm tbe ait�.
c. M' t� w the parlcimg plaa to prov� a m�
w�th c�f 8!E. 8 ia.
ATTEST.
City Cl�#c
The m�tion fvr ��piioa of t�u foregaiag resalutit�n wa�s duly sr,�a�i by mcmber
K�y
an�d upa� v�te b�e�z�,g talca� tt�t following vot�d ini fsvor f,
�r� �►cha�.� r,�ay, �►y tx:� r����;
t�tu ffc�ll�awing votai t�e sa�e: p�
said nsol�c� wa� de�cla�i duly p�ased aad ad�ptcd.
4
City oi Brookly� �cn#er
�on 3�-�1}8 REZt3NiNG EVALUATI(}1�T PULICY AND REVTEVV GUIDELIl�tES.
I. Pt�
"I'h� Gi� Goa�cil fi�da that ef[e�tive maintenance of tite comprehe�si�ve gl�n�tiag snd isa�l ase
cist�Ific�t�oas`� eahaaced t�roug6 �tniiorm and �ta�b�e ev�wi�at�o� �f perl�dic propoat+�
c�tnge� tto th�s �nin� ()ttdTw�tnce; s�d for t6fs P�►s+�, by tite xdop�n of R�aol�t�on Na. "f'7-
1167 the Clty Cetuat�l hsts t!Stab�is6ed a ttzo�g evtttu�ttio� pt►l�Cy a�d t'8vi�vv guitiel�tes.
Z. P�l��w
It is t6+� pnl�cy of t!►�e City tbat. A) Zaafa� ctaasiflestt�ons m�s# �re cc��siatent wi}th the
�Comprehen�fve @lan, and, B� Re�oni�ai= propoaats vvyill �ot +ec��tstit�te "spu►t z�rn�ng", d,�#ined
as a��� deeislaa, w�ct� discr�inates 1� fivar of a psr#c�tl�r �da��v�er �id d�tc �ot
relate to the Comprel�e�sive P�u or #o accepted pl�nntn� prin�fpl+es.
3. P�ru�ccdnre
Eaeh re�oniag prrapasal �filC be conaidernl oa #ta merits, �eas�re�[ :t thc �bove polic�►
a�d t�ese gaide�aes, w�fiic� may be welg�ed co�le�ettively or i�divid�atiy as de�aed by
t6e C�.
4, G�idellne�
A. Is th�r+c a cic�r �nd pab�ic �e�d ar benefii?
B. I� t�e pro�se� zanin� co�steat wit� �d compat�ble r�vf#� ��ra�adi�g l�ad �ss�
ciassifta�t#oas'!
C. �sn �11 per uses ia #�i�e propoted zonia� ct be ct�atempla#ed f�tr devei�pm�ai of
the snb�ect praperty?
H�rve t�re b�� sabs�atisrl physical or mntag c c�t�un ch�e.� in t�� surea a�ce t6e
��abject pro�erty w�s za�ed?
F.. I� the c�e Cityy-in�i#isKti�d rea�oai�$ proposnl� is t6cre x bruad p�tb�c purgaac �de�t?
F. Wii� th+e ��b ject property bear !'�11�► t�e orcli�asc� dev�pme�t r�ric#ans �'or tl�e
pro ��iag diatr�c�?
Is t�e sab3� P���'�3' Seneralty easaited for gses perm!#ted I� t�ie pr��t zo�fng d3stctet,
wit� r ta �Ze, coa�i�aratioa, topagraphy ur �ti��'?
Will the rc�smtng r��tit ia #he ezpstasloa of a zoai�g dis#rlct, w�trrstste+d byc 1}
C�mpre�e�sive p x) Ti�e Isck of dcveic►pAb[e ta�►d i� �e propfrrsed �aiag ct;
or, 3} The be�t iater�#s �f t�e com�n�nity?
D�es �e proposs�! dcmona�te mertt b�yond t�+e ta#ereata �t' xn o�v�i�r �r ow�+era a� s�n
i�dtvid�l pArcel?
2) Public rxreational buildings �d parks� pla�grounds and athletic
fiel�is.
33 Si�s as pezmitted ia th� Brooklyn G�t�r Sign Ckdit�ance.
5ectic�n 3S-35S PLA1�iIVED LJNIT DEVELt33P�tT.
'v�saQn 1. c.
�,'he g�upo,� of tlte Plan�ed Unii Deaetapment (P'tJi3} �:ct i� #a �mt�te fl�ibilityin Ia�d
d�cv+elc�pmen# r�velopment, praseive �etically sig�r�ar�t aud a��imnm�taUy
s�nsi#ive �ite featt��s, conserve energy and a hi�h quatity of de+�ign.
S�Ctivision 2_ t:laa�ificati+�� of PLJD �?jistricts: Pe�mi� IJ�;,�plieahle R�Zlations.
a. Upon �ezoning for a PUD, the district shall be desi� by the tctt�rs
"PUD" follawed by the alph�num�ric de�i,�utic�n of fi]� undearlY�B �8
dzs�riict which may 1� eitl�ec tt� prior zoaing cts�sificatic�r� or a new
classification Ia cases of milced PtiD�, the City Cc�uncil shall,
�anably gracticsble, spoci£�r underlying zc�tung clas�iftcetians far the
variau� parts of the PUD.
When it is iwt reasonably practicable to so �pecify u�lY�B �+�5
c cations, the Council may rezone the '`ct, or �y part to
"'FU�t-MLXED."
b. Reg�ilation� gov+etning uses at�+d savctt�t in 1''tTI3a �all b� #h� �ame t�se
gove�a�ing thc uu�dcrlyiag zaning c;t �ubj�ct tc� thc fc,�llowing:
1. Ragulations may bc nnc�di�i�1 e�cpt�sty by cotuditicras by thc
Council at the time of zr,�oning to PUD,
2. Regulation� are modified by irnplic,aticm on�y t4 t� ext�a►t ne�ssary
to comply with thc d�.welopment plam cfthe PUI�.
3. I� the case of districts �ned. t4 FLJA- the Cou�eil
�xifY regulations a�Ii�abl� ta us� �d �tur�cs in va�ious Parts
of the district.
Ci#y of Brao�yri Cente�r 35-47 C'itty++ Ordinance
c. For p�rposes of dctermining applicable re;gul�tions for uee� or structu� on
l�d �dja�t tu ar in the vicinity a�f thc PUD disfinict which cm the
zQning of the F�? disorict, the ying �rni� c' c,ati�n af �'UD
c�i�t�icts �11 b� decmad to be t1�e� �g cl�assific,�ian c�fthc �t. It� tlte
ca�e o� a distnict z+�ned PUD-h�, t�e-wr�de��.yi�g zctning cla�sificat�on
s�iaU l�e de�m�i to be the clas�ific.ati�n whic�r allows �s a pe�mitt�e;tl nse eny
u� which is p�rna�ittod in the PUI) district aad which ra�ts iu the m�st
�ictive regulation of adjac�nt ar ne�rb� `es,
Subdirra€sic�n 3. Devet�ent Staz��
,a. A PUt3 sh�U have s minimwa arca af one a�re, �rcchuling la�l in�ch�ded
within the flc�odway or flood fiv�ge ovexiay di�ricts excludi�tg
rights-�f-way, waic�s the City fi� that at Ie�st ane vf tb�e following
ctrntiiti�ans e�ists;
1. Thare are ur�usual physical f of �.e pmperty ur of thh�
sa�armu�n�ding neighbori�od �uch th�# development as a PUI) will
ca e a physical or f of im�nce to the
neighbarlyood or community;
2. The pmperty is directty a+d��t tQ or a�mss a public r�ght-of-way
firom pmporty+ which prewic�u�Iy wss d�.wet�d as a PPUT1 a�d the new
FI3D will pca+ceived as a�ui fiu�tton as �n �te�on of that
pn�►iously approved d�vclapmcnt; or
3. T�+c pmpe�rty i� located in a 'tional area b+c�v� di�+�t t�ud
use� and the de,welopmmt will b� as a t�ut�er betw+� #he us+�s.
b. Withi�r PUD, ovaraU d�ity for r+esideatial d+�vclopme�nts �it t�e
c,cnc�.istent with SectiQn 35-400 �f this ordin�acc. I�ivid�l build�ngs rnr lots
within a PUD may exceed theac standar+ci�, providad #h�t de�sity for #t� anturc
PjJI) do� not e�cceed the per�i�cl st�aciar+ds.
Setback�, b�+c�rs and �trip� withua a PLII�► be �rrith
Scction 3S-44t3 to 35-414 and Se�cticm 35-7Q0 of thia �rdin�c+G tt�a
devel� c�n d�onstratc t� the �ity's f�ction i�ai a 1 stan�iar�i
shauld be peramitted with ihc addi�icm of a scre�inig �t or othc�
miti e m�easur�s.
�City v,�Brookl�m Center 35-48 Cu,� Ord�nance
t�,, �BT�g pL�YIE�Gd �OT 118C8 withtII 8 P� SbBu �C COIlS18�CL1� vwl�l t�bC p8i�1II$
'I t8 GClDt8lTiCd III $�Otf �",�i��{}e} p�' �Y1S O�C�1�� fi3i1�C88
t�lqEt�
t�trl�IB�CF G8i! �O�StTBtC t0 fi�l� !CI��►'S 88�18�$t?t1
1�1�D12�t� �C pCnIItt� 4D $tE $[Ot3IIt� Qf �iC tAffi}1�CIIL�I'11�` O�� p
d�usa�ls t�y the uses within the PUD. ThQ City may r�quire �ac�cu�ian af a
r�ciive covcasnt limiting fi�tute use a� the PmpettY to tha� us,e�s which
will conti�ue this parking compi�nmtarity, a�r which are a��rwise a�gprov�l
by the City.
Suk�ivi�icu� 4. Gen�eral Standard�,
a. The City may allaw more than ane pri�rcip�t building be ccros�nictad an
e�ch plattead lot within a PUD.
b. A I'U� wbich involves anly on� lat�d usc ar a single �u�ing ty� may be
permi�d provided that it is vth ca�ts�is�it wi#�► tLc purpc�ses anci
objactivss of ttiis section
�c. A PUD may only contain uses consisteat witfi the City's Camp�ve Plan.
d. AU property w be included within a PUD shaU bc wQUtet' ws%fied t�wne�ip or
control or subjcct to such legal re�s4rictions Qr �ov as n�aY be n��arY
tc� campliance with thc a�mvcd d�evelopme,nt pla� �d �ite plaa.
s. The w�iqumaess of each PUD rcquir�s that spc�ificatic� aa�i stan�dards far
s� �lities, Public facilities and the approval of la�d su�bdivision may be
subje+ct �a modific,ati4ns from t3� City ca� �e��ilY �"��'�8
Tlae City Cou�il may, t�efoarc, apPro�rc utilities, pubtic fa�ilities
��i la�l subdivisions whiich ar� �i ia �ompli�ance with ww�al '�tc.a�ic�ns
or ordinan�cc re�quirements whe�e it i� fotu�d that such �nc n�t raquimd i� the
t� of thc residextts or of t�,c Ci�y, e�tcc,pt that subdivisians ancl
I pl�s must �e in confosmancc witb a12 w �r�
wa�, erasi�n contml, and wei�u� r�q t�•
'si+on 5. Anol'� 'cm Raview.
a, Impl+c�enta#ion of a PUD si�all be cantmlled by tt� develc�aent pl�u. Ttte
develc�aea�t pisn may be appr�v� or roved �y the �ity Council
�avaluation by ihe Plsaning Cammission.
S� ''c�n af the dcvcloprm�tt piaa� 1��nacie thc �it�eto� of
p g aad Iaspection on �uch f�nr�s,aad aai�dhy irsf `o�
�nd +t�tation as �e Git�+ naay ary or conv�ni�t, but
ivaclu�dc at a rninimum tlu follt�wisg:
�'iry of Bmo�tyn Center 35-49 City �rdinance
1. Str�t �xl utility l�tians a�d sizesb
2. A clrainage p1aA, including lacstian �d '�rae c�� pipes �d wateet�
st�orage areas;
3. A�rsdin8 P�, ���8 �P��Y ar�d p�man�nt t�sian cunttoi
pmvisions;
4. A iata�ap� P�;
5. A liBh�E P�
6, A pl�n far timiag and phasing c�f the de�relopm�t;
7. Cov�n;aats or othar restrictions gmpos«i �aar th�e regnlation. af the
dev�iopme�t;,
8. A�ite plan showiag the 1oc�tion af all siruct�u�s a�d parkimg
9. Building rendaings or eleva�ion drawi�g;s of atl sid� afsll builclings
t� 1� cc3nstcuctod in at lea�t the 5rst ph� of de.wel�►pmea�t; and
10. Pmpc�s5ed und�rty�ing z�uing classific,atio�ar c� �lassificat%on�.
Such infurma�ion may be in a prelinais�ary foTTn, but .c�tly
complc� ar�ti accurate to allow �u evai�ati4a ofthc d�welopment b}► the City,
b. 'Tl�e Ptanning Cammi�ion shall �old public hearing on the c�e.welopment
pl�►n. Nvtice of �ch publia h' l� publishesd in th� officiai
new actuai notice sball i� �aailed to the �pplic,ant anci acljaceat
P�P�Y aw��s as roquirad by Scctior� 35-210 of this ordinan�e. Tl�c
Plaan%ng �ommiss%on shaU review the d�cv�lopmc�t gtpm a�cl �akc such
rcc�omu�► 'cros as it dxnns r�ate rcgsa�rrti��g thc pi�a within the time
limits li�hai by Se+ctioa 35-21Q Qfthi� 4r+dinsuce.
c. Fc�llowin� rcceipt of the necomm�dations ofthe P1au�ing C sion, t�e
City Coww�cil sh�ll b�ld. such h�ca�ing as it agpr!apria�te re thc
matter. The Gity Council :hail act upon the d�r�elc�pmmt plaa wiihin #he
timc 1'units c�bli�sh�ci by Sectivn 35-2It3 oft3us ordinance.
A�p�va1 afthe d�+elopmeat plan �nstitute razot�iag t�f� pr+o�ty to
PU.i) �i con�tual approval ofthe ele�ne�ts ofthe pi�. In �ddition the
guidelinc.�s pr�vided in Section 35-20� of ihis c�rdi�anc�, thc City C�un�il
�hall bas� its actions on the re�aanin,� ur�rn th�e f�ll+awimg cnt�ia:
City of Brookl�m C�enter 3S-SO �iry 4rdinanGe
Compatibility af the plaa with the st�a�lt�+ds, p a�d inte�t �f
t�is �tioa;
2. Ca�#mcy c�f the plan with ttu goals ,az� palicies of #�e
Coa�epmeherysive Pl�a;
3, Tfie �npa�t of the plan an the n�ighbonc�3od in which it is ta be
Ic�c�teci; and
4. 'The adoquac3+of intcrnal site or��.atian, u�, de�ti�s, �ula�ian,
P�S facilitics, pia�biic f�►cilitie,s, ��anal areas, ope� spacces,
and buffr�ring and l�nt�capiag.
The City Cc�uncil may attach �uch canditicros tv i#s approval as it may
dete�mi�e t+a be necessary+ to bet�er �mplish th�e prupose�s of the PUD
distriet
d. Priar tc� constivctian on any sit� za�nai PUT�, i�u devetop� sh�l s�dc plaa
a�roval pwrsusnt to Secti�n 35-23{} of this ordinau�e. In ati�ition to the
informaticro speciScsUy raqui�ed by S�tion 3�-230, the d�uel� �hall
�ubmit sur�h informa�ron as may b� da�ncd ner�sar,� or ca��v�tieint by t�c
City to review thc consiste�cy of the cd dcvclapment vv�ith the
v�d develapmea�t plan.
Th� p�an subautied for approval pursuani tc� S�ection 35-230 s�aU be ia
subs#�a� cc>mplia�ce with iha appmved devclopm�nt plan. Substantia�
compli�nnce shall mean that buildin�s, Parking area� and ro�3,s are in
aUy the samc location as previou�ly;�pproved; th� numbar o�dvvc�lting
wuts, if any has not incxeasad or d�reascd by more ti�tan S p�+cent; th�e flocn
aze� o�noaresidea�al aress has uot inc c�r dec by mo� tha�
S Pc�cat; no building has bc� uacz�ad in the aumber af fl�ors; ap�
has a�a►t bcean al or alta�cd from its origiu�al dasign or use, a�rd lvt
cove�a�e of any individual buiidi�ng has n�t b� i�creasad vr d�crca�ed by
mo�e t�aa 10 p��
e. P�i1or w construction on any sita PUD, tha �evelap�r sb�sTt eate�e a
cieveiopme�t a�ant in a forta to the Cit�y.
f. Applicants may combine deveic>pm�n.t plan appraval with ti�� plan �mval
z+cquired by Sectian 35-230 by sub�uttin� at1 infoan�ti+�t z�aqw�ed for both
�imt�antsty.
g. Attcr agpnaval c�f #hc d�.wel4pm�nt �rle� a�nd the pl� a}�prc�v�l x�uir+od by
Scsction 35-230, n�thing sh�11 b� c�n�tr�ctod on the �it�s a�d no buil�ing
�e�mit� sball bc issued exc.ept in co��rmity with t�+e �groved p
�iry of BroQklyn Center 35-51 City C3rdi�zar:ce
h, If wit�in 12 montl�s following �praval by the City Cc�unc.�il o�' #he
c�wel A1aa, building p�rmit� l�ave be� ob or if withiu 12
mont�s a#�er the isswance of bu�i� pe�mits const�ucriaa �s aan�
on t�uc �rea approvad farr the PtJU disccic� the City Cc�u�il may initiate
rezoniag uf the property.
i, Anym�or amcndm�nt to the dcvelo�pment�laa maybc agprovalbyt� City
Cou�il follovving the same �tirx and h�arinig Proc+ddwr�s �tCifi� in t�is
�ctian. An aumendmeat sha�l be canside�d ma�or'ifit iavclve�o sn�+ ��sage
th�a tha# pe�mittod by Subdiv�on �d of tttis �ion. C'i�ng� �ich
azo dct+�rmined by ttu City Cou�ncil ta be nunar may mas�e if arppraved by
t� P Cvmunission� afte� such n4tice and hearing as m�y be d�aned
apPmpri� by the Planning Cammisaion.
Cuy nf �rookljm Center 35-52 �ty 4rdinan�e
w a a a r
�H�t��
F s
Bt�UN�ARY AN1J TOPaCRAl'HY SfIf�V�'I'
F'vr
a�rv�z cv�rt�,en!r�s
rN 7'£R s TA T�' #�t t GH WA p�
N 0 g g �««:.`.:M:.....
e ^w a
v ir,_,, ..a
a ,r
r
V r
w x
,i�
0.
y ....:-.R:"""`•,.� F
r f-" r.�..
w+..i..�.r.b ve'�ww..w
r .-r�w.w�.+..�`
�w r� r� �m.w '�,;rtrc .....,�..w�»�,,.r
C? .r r
V w Q 1
O ..r :+:.w�.�". a
r i�
4 t i� y 1� 9 :��5°LK:�,,^�°
�G j� r r 'q rw
r r r r T d 1+ .+rw.�
P t� t r •r ♦.�+r�� w��
Ar
A
1,�i r�� r ,y�"
e �..."�""r ��..�w. �l
Ki e. A' ,.r .r 4 �i i
4 i .r
�S"'�-�..,�, i..�+ w 7Rdi>i i".�.. C
e
�.s...f n, ekn,�,ceA
c t ,�....P.1" -c
r i .s ,.r ��i r
V A �r
.+.+f> �n'" J MM A�NMtI
L
j
q„- n �i.a,� yRIpR
j ��w�Mw�ias+MY+�twr.wwwrrw..i �r
t l rr tsw�.+r�#�Yr��ar#rY! �pvt
f pr r i x w`,
i t r !YS �M�MNN/M��IIIw�w1�
A y �'i"'�w"wr�Er.'h'�'e: w I
i
r t i w
�I i Gae Cr �COT s�
{,���E XSMAF�"R' dfY CAIM'7Y�l�AAt C'�nC�7 {AIY�W :4w.g���.�.xf
w�L.«iY/fL,�� h i. wr wY� warMMka
�'Y
'I
Il�i
;0 l s 1 1
I
I
I
I
a s r 4
i N
r
a' a 1
y
w
L k x!
r �E� `.�.,yy,��,�
a ,r a
H �'71���iW40
v ��I.�w�
f �g� IMM 1Mi�
y
q r.. „�n
+�l O O� m *1 �Y
.+a
,F wws aa.. i
i
•w r
A,
.:wMYAYA-
y, �w�: .�..._.e^' 4 t Y9A
�h, a
t wM. �.w�RSn
4 C` yR �+r+�tMfw
r a... ws
"f. awr.
�4 7
t, m
t t Af'PkQ7tifkXfiTE w +sr h..a..�
DFSTVRHEO AR�A 15
1a r 8,29 ACR�S
91 x r�,c r+s*t�a.+. E
w a 4 r�w a�w �r
pl t "�w
�,i a� �1
t
w
`y
3 Y 4�i `4 f� s t^` yanpr[p gL�..
a'
y 8
f
p G.' r i f d �t P M1�1C�)
�{F S M �t 1„„�
��1 dx
r 1 `�w�„ �t?a",�' .se��*a`"w��:'".s�"a
�«r e
I,��rL1
r��'"
r
�,f y 'y R j«. m.wnemw
4 ����i f ��/�y. ����u+ir.»s. 0
..e t a a
y f
ri
3. :4 f r _i «ee uY.o`.
�i r ...�.�„e �r�� '�3
a
j
a ....LV 3 I� ffi j�
�I
.r, rJ
t t
.�n.w 90 V �.t
I t C i 7 k w
K� r r'fa 7f 4'�'b+,`�'i'} W .�.w...w�. +r.+M+.
.x� r� 'S 1"'-' S l!}..» +..�.ww�..�.irr.
wi�« ;.y �4_., r,.� m'�r.;+�"won"�: ,w.�.... I
i 'r t s flt r'i 4 i 7:a �,�r'�`,y�+�+,� M arr sw�wew. I
.b.
y` tiA s+ f �„g€ r"?`�j. R I
t
s. j t �t 6 'v... G f 7,. �sZ: aa.rer�.w...
A f a ..._f �,�.i t 3 '�'��i t.:�e �+w,.�.rw.w...«Rw
`o-. A
I 'L+. a .i t P t r �.sr�rrer
t t`" �,d' p 1 th Z a` Y 4 ���x# k i,�a �+*C"+�:�.�.`�w""seM�
sr r '.r. w r�ii„ i I t �il 9 ..v'C� t,�t..,.'� '*-:x
�t�„ T A
t .,.i� rt� ..a r���a �4
x
m.
w i t `A�"' EB..*+ I
i .r �+���x,� r �F� r��.� ,f i j i ��":���'i''�`:+`�.
t t4 r �Y
�p t �'s,., w"""`".+ 4 J Mt+ i k ""�."�".:s �"r��.w����
r.., yy.fwr ��+y��� a r I L7CV�l�I I
f�
w j ::s�"'�.m'a�s.:�s»�z.�.
�VV.IiI Q ���L(�%�'Y!} Vii ��'�'ly�r T 4 Y.rWqxMMF1i�RMwRlAMYMKMiAttwl6�Irw�. ��IMtl�.�1��1�11
ww�s� 4:"5
z �i S r Cp' r,��. "a *�ow 1L7`:�..,�..�.A+.�. +�.w.�
.z C4NFERE ��,CEIV �.:r��.�...�r....,.-�..�,�—
�t�v� et �r �.�'t�.�v, a� tr, "�z. ��r t:xr, �Nt.:aa
,,,,v�r: _...�.m,. P1.M1
��.a��«�k... �:m'�.. F �t�.�.
M. m..�ww..«.�.�..,.ar«�...a...w..Y.�.w....�.�.��.� �"�'..'�"'iilf�l"iL..r
.w
.°�wet'ws�'+x`�.: w�.ar.�...w.�..+r. �w..�'"eia
.,��x. ;w��n�.,rr...:.�f'.cw '�'""""wir.
.����"'"'«S'eS�"..."�� �n.
t 6 i 7
�,�,.h.
x
�.fA
o .Ma,wr acw K�n
t rr i ""r' �a �yj���
w, .ervn�ue
r '�",n c» arq,r
r h�aeal6 --•�^e1kM+—
uk ,,..-a 1WF
wa u.--..._ Mq+!Nnuw o�YiM
ww m r.:..
.<^t g
r y Mm+ P
.r L�6A«._.... YMW fMt�
�G'
f,w ��4 piMMQ rtdR NMMw
pMw
k r,.
.su'ud,...,..�+....._.fti
ti u ws k
1.. 4 .t 7
`y t �......���i.�........
t
i
e
an s s ,t� W �i
t' i!i i
s ,wa p
e m e�,.. e
t E�" r�",r` AFYPROX1AtA7E a'w
LN�UR�D AREA iS +.`"�w.
f r F �g g+�� 1<s 6.20 NCftES
.wF t f w�-r��wt a.
�ac w x aw+�
..,J f w .r�w..s w
d �t�,
�y 3 C s m,.
y i
f r r 1' t �'Li�.as.."'�. w i s w+w�rr� rtn rr..r
'm� .�'r` �,�r,= n ...1 �?r... 1:.�..r
...r �Q,
g y
I
r 4 r �,...�..«M'. `Xi•"�.diS4�3S•�E'�l:t.M
..d...�...�«,.«�.......wr+
3 :.i" '�f.l�G� ^4i.'7L..
,i�. r�.S'�rru...�r.r..we•..a..u.w�w.w�•
e
f -7 r i 1�. y„
+r
�i j T L j M r r��
4, t o To
Y f R. i Om t }k� jvf �3T.i5'�
'�.y,.. i a .���i"i+ .��'�r.w...
��1.. t t r�� ITY ��r�..�+rwww �r�. r
0� r.r t"'p ��'�'.t.�:w'�"1is '�r"�`��r`��. C
1 f P�'�`�¢ b1i i r` t i r�s
�."7�L'#' �l"'
.�,w I, 'lr �s`,'j:kj. 'a�' ��t;`�"',� j y�j•;„• a �+,i"�:.'k+'�"'�.�� �.w�r�
b i 2�� r��� A.� d j y¢�,, r„,.
A i. rr
r r
F, ti��l
y wpw�w
f f y t S d
�i�k f� rwwr�`^ir`R WRw���"�"�ww'��`�'�
"•.�.�r.�� t t t f t 4�i�i'"�'�"�a"�w�."13"'�Fk'A4
f i p f �t t j 4�'.,,
P 3, ...+nwww�r...
�.S�.�n
°•f� 4 F +rwrws reua�wwrer �.srarwrwwyr�� �.wvw
y l 1 r �+.r� ww
t
.1S i �t �y 4 f i.. u�.�"ari+Ss"i�
.I�
l�
�,..ny� t d��,+ i� i 1„ i� i�ir.r.rr...nw*rwwic+M�+ew��+�nw.ni+.
�..:iaw 4` �.rd
s. �.w:y; �t r s 9u�a�
a.
'a '�*'*,:4 a„i.., s st a .�.t�wrw�..�w.aw.wrrwa+s.rrvs�
-+W.. y
j 7'yr rc ,.w�i+� .k-.._ ":�x+ �r i�'.'."".+�w":r" �'�nJC�'T.� +ea..nr+..
�+llCJ�lYI (L�fl�A�Y.���i(f�� ���'a•y#'�},w:.q:�-�•`�•h w. �,,;�r u awtw4aw+tiw„rsrarFr+.,wr.it+�.�aw�+�srwNt d�iY9rMw+Yx.
y v».. 4 re.r.�s u.w..rna..«w,wwawa.aRww
,�.�w �•+w.wwrww.wra.+.�..+wn.�+re.ra
4�d,..` ,.s��..��„e� �s 1 »w� ���4 e�.
CON�'EREI�`��CEr�� �s"�" �c; �a,
a.s,�sa��ssss I
+.�...r.+w y�.�.
a Ot w..w�+.«+« .w.«.h+. 'ir y 1 r
k a�rwM1WY�itlwYO�M ar QFruw+U!{.w+h♦ rtew�. wR�♦!6 w
M9K iFY�i �iM1MN�f! Mip�IS
r+�ae+aswow�ws�s 7�AF N "l a�r.. w ��w'r�iiG A� a.r
�e
"i �wr+sw.s:
t`x .a m� i Ett...,.i. ���.'�:"..u."£S#C'.i5'lii .3,..�` �°.�'�.."L.`r'�ar�.x'3S�".`"A'o" r���
.�,:�0'„d m'"'".�,.'°Z"'..+w� ��w.«i ".++ww"w�� a�.4"e.'�'���� ,�."�w�. .wr�.�
�.wr r.
Yis� �+sa M°°'r`�eu
W�.�� i
R r
1 a f a 1 M i
N ye �+w..y
i! E +w..r
�1 r. w.rr wwa
T' �.o..�.
r�t p#w$s��
v .r� }iyyy f� wYSaw.w� NwW
f t ..�w�+.+< «i�!
N a 1 v� w
w w.�.eA.� w.x.
_.A
iY rrws� 't
W. w
..a.. a o» a_„ ,n �t
r
�,is _..w.».R—
a
��..,wwa_.a�
r
t
ti 1 �+nv .w. w.wn..r.m�n,..e..s w perw.
e �s:�"��$.3�+r�.�'�+.wrrr �?"r"i. «+'""'�wdwr '^...r
,.q.w.......�.w.... «».�.«.......«v...�...
4 a rv. s�OW�Mb4il�nk
M ��4M+Mi�X�Y.wf
rY X Y
4 p� 8 wwt },awwds� M«"'e'ar�+wewG:sw aarwrw�w+wM.+<1urr.��ew
i <r.r.w�+..ro.�.r.awww�
1� w.ww.ew�+raw�wwsr�+.a�rr«wrewr.a:
�.wwwrwwsw� swn.r.►�rw
a
1�. tl'Y�MIM 9 4M rY�4Mt Wkt i ts�.dMYY
��Mlwp
E ,,+w.«��"'«,#7��r`�:;.w.....,....�...�....
iPB �.0 i e
�w...«...�.....«�,»..
a
w
�"...sa�. u i .�+.iwti:`ww,w.«a..Mr.�.r,r.r
u-� +arw a r. re. i rF .r a
ra» r .+w. w �r �r«nw:
awtw� ...0 rr .1
y�� a+iw. w w ws
s v..�.
1 E+w(a .L i :rw.
E Mr+.f e «ae i
f L.�'�'" 1 .w.
'+r.,+��r.��.�.f..-..,'�". H+1 ..s.
�,�r �r s.rw
r o.
,c +r. r «r «r. �w
r. t tii i'..�� _�.v._,. ,1'
'w sne .w a+
�i� "_x� y..��. w. �W�� .v+:.i
f I eE �..w. «.w. �J. 'x�.T r'
F rw
f 1 ti
r 1`�: .-Mw 1
n
r�rw E �r r i
�r t 4 u G�� n» �...r i
F i_.�.
r+iw�w'� e�,131� t ?k'"..� F r ♦.w o ...wr wv, .ws i
p° wF w
jj w,wrr 4 a 1 ..9...... G
t d r 3 r, i F aar+,.. a 1 7+w+* MMe
f Y ta Y k.�:�: trsN!a�. +r 4+W� w�Y a.,a�+w�,.ws.....��..�
k
i
��4 i �5�'� �O�11FMY�IlT11F �..MaiiMM.+il�iYMM'
�'j" r.—r.. 4 a e :e�.w. u.r
y�^�
j f r �f li a r .Z.,`w,. `w��
w�
,.,a wrwi...
y j f I `'t a� t',� e DI r'+"�'r'L�".�"i5�.�.'9'�" o A"�
t i f Q ,�i�"r'S'€3YR�'�Sw'" +'w'�r�u"�s1Ai"'
r
a 4 C �p ....b'iPw"S.w�i�9'�"it
x
v. t"�� y Y t s 4"Y.�.. "'.�..T�'"',Y�".."S S� "!Gl
�v'
j ttr° q r i .C�°:. `*L r B►p4�q QI►dM
q 4 �*r+.+ i L '.i�8'li'0�lt.'.�.."C'�7'.'�It'+�Sa
��1 'ik 1.1 �f 91"� '�+Yi'5...+kr..:..�F ""J' �'"bn.
y
..-......o...........,..s._�.....
COUNTY FE!)�'i'��'�'/� �_.a� .�s�` �'rc�a�-��
�w
f
"��7� ��.��r+rw�.awr«rrrww.�..rarrr.+w.rrr.w
�M++�w�rwr�
.y wrnw�uw.aaw.+w�w,w....urwr,+►..wr�w.u.
C�DNFERE P �EI�T' �n�urr
y
a"' Y�S�t+ ��rWa��YMWr��.AM�R,fISa+MMY#RlYww�i+'nYIM I I
�IiV a �f M!!.
�M Y�e pWM�M 1 ���/itMll'MYP Ni�Yw I
t i I +w IbCw, i+�M Yc Y�w Vi�ns M+M4r F� a, V KT Wa NFC��+w�Yf a /iM�w eB� wwY
�r�rw�t 1 9 w.rr«�«a,wa«iwr.w.rwu �t we«+rwor+c��r.+..aa �w+w:�...�«�..+w�.frww..
.�a,.� w.i..�r..w +s+w..<aw
o.wrn[ f «v�*r ++..wr..a ww ww.+wa.wa w.wmr ��....w���w w:� �I
ARA&20lSIMdAT rwr f iw'E� n .�s.w�e�.a.�.r.ee �a+e "�ivr�e'.'wrounrrn�wwaswrw.r +nene�.m. ��r*ws�
E rrrsre.+w�wrwauwwwrar+ e�rwr.sw.
O15TUR�p AR'EA'S� �.w+�..w.�.r.v..+w.e ��..+�r.rw...��..a..ar.,+.��.e.. 'O�'
6.2b�ACR�S (awwra� J wu.�r..c+wr.«wr..wer ��.r.v�wa.���.rr.sws�o+..�rr .ww�eaoa..eww+.w. '"•w'�+�
�'.r�wr.+�:"a'��a. ..w..w...w.«e»r... r��a� w+
V"# �i
t s s s y
i...
I
f
�1
;r
°G'�-. P�'; i �"r, ty..
�s ���r�',�-- i ,r�
i ..t..,.
s� g Ci
p
r sst�
a "r�� 1 �t���t�[EI �'s�
'y�
a ^yy rt
5�`+Y#'F �i. b:.« pT f R f w M iF i
"�,Afi;t+>s. t t r t s t 7 F
Y y,
�i�'� r1 :.��7 i
M..... F t[.d.. e......� �s.�
F:` �i S �ii�i +++eee/// �!g• i
G k 0 T S
y� 1
o t fi�
r ��iS.S#i�ra# t'. 3 5
t.� 6 ��s33!l:::9`x ��������is
tt
1 r� Y�93�9�
e�g y
B L::«1�!!SS e
kt s� 0
v
1j �z3:�t#it! q
o j
t
I �31L �_J
r a ...a":
t
y �r
a
r.
p
b 3 ��A"'. 1 .k ±A'1,. .tdb*i
4 E i.. �1:
k 1°'�� 'a5 ��3�
1 h r x,�-K.._ i; 1+�u.
0 7
i t 1
1 _r E i
�4"` r
I i i c "`,"�t�v'? t e t f�
J t �e s j f� x E
j i 1 T` �i �1�
Y 4 i E r j �(,r' e t+ w Y'_ r
_tl'
fw 5 t 11Af, w 3 �"�#�iY'. YI
r e �k
k s i i �t�
t s S E
i� i
R
i
t f A a 1�
a ��:!*�:4i ��I �i��
s
t���,.-
1 i �F� 4rv f
�.Y *�i .::w.^. t�.
i�`` y s_ 3 n
m
i.{�'
i.�
�.�y`' y a� E
lm Ya���
s""-^ f
f .�J
1 1 7 u �.�.3..
a` ,�.,.r- �...q�
y R
i M
�Y
�..�M.��:,,�
SJI� Ar�
+w..� �w �+r
��,�,�,..c.n u..,.,... w �.w� rrwa �N}�� f
aN ��,„w.r^!�"�
..w..��w... Ib
.x
i .�aw+..r.r. 1�
y
��r `.tr:�""'� ,'�.i
�y �A'�"`..
t r e
r y` M Y -�i i _....a�aua
r 1 APAROXtAGiT�
g atsruaee�s ar�n es
"{s'
.Qf: 6.20 ACRES
x rj r, �...o.... ...�.�y,n..�,..� /�*t`. p
4 !s aQ i6 i0 ��""i"`. E
ia.�a...
1�I8 �ISO.0 1 �r
y,'.
E 1 3�
r f u`�
ww«wqw.u�anrwR+w+r.�w+��.�[rnwn.rewre
f k i .aww�wMrotew+Yw+xw.� snai+�+nsrw
r, s
r r:�� �¢r.. I '�".'1'�".'3' .�wawr..w.� .r+ar.�.s.w
P ..8 r �.�Jk��J-� .��K.�'L'�,+�. rr...s.
y
y ��Y 4;� �a�i..'�°� 0
t
x i a
r a
r
.a' e� t �+.t° m�r„oo
"`F n/" 1 y �t�� ,.w.w.......r.w..ww.....
,�7 f A1ffil"L�Et'LT'i 39'C�R'iSQ .ffi'L9G�.S�$.'�
..r.+ww.�..+w....ww+.
r
I dA�.
m ....A...,...,,.....
m m
.�.e.,........
V �,,.r s 4. w.�.......�,.......�..��..».»m�,
r
t •'.j• l t6�"'t
i
7�7�
�"�G f; a� 2 1p+ru�s�r�+w�w.+wE
`L R ,w ffirr..w.+«».++w�ew.�r..r....�w..
J i i 3 Oq�.u...r..tiw�swe.w,�« p
C PF6 Hl:� a' .•l'`! 7
u� jp 1 �+rwsw+.ws�srrer,ea�asw
`V ftl l ti� b p wrprls.�AaMR�� �..rr
F
.+.s. �t i t 4 r f 4 r f ��+w��w,,�± o.rsr� «�wwrwa.�n.
1��..i p t p� ti .r i �&�iti+'w:�"�w'i"`i �swwu�ruw.'w+:'�.
L r j f �t 1 YY �i v @l w. «r «.n.a n. w .+,w�
i r �t a l l Y w w. r. w..`w. wu
f a �l�j` h �,...»«.,..�.�.,»..�nr..
.i Yi 1 i �.w.+rr+rw.rt�vi.�
s s
r i
s r. r
.wr.. w�..r.w� �w+nw ws.
�u7'"�. c l j t� E j drutwe�rrewnrwrwwwn�.
,h. v S
t -v f a�.. e j t i
��"W ,a r Y r 3 �.�a p F
E.;'�i x� ly�, r' k I Gi�11
i,' Q�N st�
G�IUNTY F�1)�`17�I���'`R�f�ld` r j �x�.�
y n.3a.^� ...�rr- �+,.4 i k k
.�r...M .,d l,
q
�.e �'i�. �x.... 7 Q. t ..r -t...
�r r.
CoN�EREl+��'.a CEtr 7�,,�,'
s �r�� t
�„�.�4..,;� a��-°-..
1
TOTAI STAtI C(JUWT: 295
TOTAL NANOtCAf�F�E{? STAl1.5: 11
REfJUIRED WANOIG0.t STAI�.S: t t '"'�m�u'ae"•••.•�
R�GULAFt SiAI�.S
i 3 lsR4V ACGESSABI.E STALi. �.r�:�
�..d� ar`z"
��i..... 4Pub
s s
t ,.r. .r,..
ss
a„t
y
ra
k
w fi' S-a. iHiH? s
,F.r�.
.s„
7 i e�
:c�.
'.x_?. r
..N".
.'y"-.
IF*s �L1
..:``s` 3.r7" ��r�r �r.a
i3 I� II�' a���`S, f16.��TS��f
._.u-�
e' z m►i..�e��h���•�����
a` I�
'SS
r4"b .4k, i2�:
���.,n..
m Zy+ �a�. ti! �'ki� 1.!
F D
rc:-c �r_s= �ca,., ,�c,:=
�i1111i1 m
2,,
s��� s�'°'«
f;•
i?�,�
r�
.��.�....�.r
Ar��
�1 �r e.
�w yy
c cr i: T r"�+c�i�
�1: r- r. �Y:
EF i+ tLt
t ..r'..
f[ r 2 't���:
LY�� �k:�. w�a
I��€
,i J����Lc\►ic r'/ .i.�`1 f�i
a�► i �11�i
i�ir i ��1i��i �i�..�x
r
_~M�MIi���'!%' c �.:ar�r,�
i
ic,� tir:.u�.
l� 'M3�11��i� ca,r.:uH;
'�wls/'' �..N r.i��si n
t' <v:5` cs�
.�..r t
:'FS: :�4't. i'E'F, T.. ;:[C�
+�i �c. a ,t ,r„
'�1�:3'.'. .._.Ji..«...._.. „t„_ �IG'Z. 7yk'
f4'1= Ilf[:°Y` .ja......��ll�[—L�[.�'.�.
�.i
w i "!r+.!".
4u+'u'r+0.'AY
�1..��w__�QQn�.��� 'r Ra{�
a ��4srt.� Ta+� ...�i
1 11 �'��5 ���.t., k �0. i 4 �r
1� v„ C'„x«.+,.. k
...a
i
r-t
y w.
a a... �1!$t1� 6
x. �4. �r....
.:a �.'3;
V�1 .�m �.t
4 �v.
;:h. ��M. 4.i �leio o
M4 A o a �o t,,� f ti
r i.► o p,�~✓`
4't4 o'f
i,r t,► a Q ,a
:,l o
f'�
t�
a 1
a
i�+.,, �o 1:,,
p°s o o> 7� t;�y -r..• ,eQ
p°°OO ��f d(,Y n �I;
�►,i n1� e f r o.
�t �i1
�R �a o
o s.. '1
04�
a 90 j
e c os �1 4t►
T�' YI
.rk1 4'. �,.r hy J�
5 F ^z
t y�r� ,s "�xg &,y i ��4 1v.�+.� �.x^�
tt'e x �A x a
f► ao. e �'a��'s�' s >x
o+ 1# F�l,i _a w:r F�s y 1 u
=a 3 1�4 1,► t.f �f�i o Y�������� A �a?fi�
t��, t r► �a�
�(,w: r Y T4 i �x
w I` �'a �'f��► Fal'°
li"�'r >7/ R'.w� x�`,s�.�+��@ s
Ix► ..es. Y��� �rs��
�iM 1ti► tt'��^ 4�1r o00 ::.,w. .�a pss:
t�> ywA 'f� f 'a
S;' I ��D 0 ,Qp�p�� i i ��t3'" �.-e-,3.„x
r oe s 1� w s r �a �x
C i t�fli.► �P ,�I •�,�^n'� s� �i a
1�► o a
o g`�^ 4 t ir
m k3� �R.
�s •a �r i► N`�.��'�, �.�s f
M I�► �i !s b �u xn.'�' .�t, �r
O Y l Y�'
I �i►1 a a �i� t M ".M. 1 z �a_� .1
a �:��t i +x°t 5 f u�i�"
e .r'�';r i`� i=i1��''�`
�r
4A f,f �M�Il�irl��i1��,)�� s :�'^.^.^'.rd 's P!'! "'.""T�11��17� i++�?��3��,r`�. 't��'� J �a� t y
:i t;k .r p. r x,
�x tR .•�a,�i, .r► ar d oi f i} 1,
i+
{I ,►1 a d� n„�
y� a e1,t m�► �t'�i mt"�':�� r,:.� 1 ��,�s a�':
i:v i �"4 er M r�.,.�
td 1�R "r
���4 ��a��,
�Irl w a '1�` r �r.� a
w �a ������=r�� �iE �'',f
�,f sa► _�rrr :��1M �i rwr JIY ,96� ��„y�`
t�► �`dyA k s■ t �tua�«' �,'iFx`�-�.y�'v-,'xsS�'a� '�r
i x ��s •r 4 >����i,.;1', r xt,��`�'� ��c:;
j s r° u k,t �Z �"a4 ar a s��
1 t yk �`'s. :m e �e" y
�r <AN i "�'v� s 3'* �F r e, s. s a, k��t 5;�� ,:r,'���
J �j�i rMr.... d o-l:A.:i ,�.,^�'"'�s"` i���
i.. ixr��:._..... r.�� �ie,+,� y �y�y�
fi
o
a o �+(t'M t .r t z R ,.t_y C .�.�i..,i:f�"..
e J
i p +a
.r._:�, ,r Q
o
x a
oo e�
f
fl{ yr f `e I
4�, 4 `t.
l.�/i ,r�.�.;�.�..-
ee �e� ee
i �ee .ee
t
e�. ae
.-a.. r v
oa a:
a
A I
i• j' ,r
�1�► �M, t.t �`w0 9 `a'0 r
�nr�
j...' �.�t k� +�a���» ,..c
I. a r F r��,�U�
1��l� o a i� g o o.�. e�'z� x p,�"a� tS.��'�`
t^�� �N�'��.► d�� �'1��k� �.�a��°°�. tz .z,. v±�
x� o
�re� r f ►�1�M 't�* a o y rm I! *,�a�r t�
r, r,� �:e� �it r
i i�
1�� f�t 'I�► a o a, �'-,x,
t�► e V t
�j a w m 3
S r O aP�� 1 4'�� .W"
r i► tdw 9'�`"��:'�r�'�'�` �Y 7kb
a a a i
�4 ��i�►�� s�� x`
Ii� Cj.► 'a:hu ,+r- 3 k
".,i s
�e �y,�''`
r U i 9�
R a �y r d '4.,�
4 e i
d� ril� y y Ss �.r*1' ,y
�w►� ��ic>, r
a i x 's„, �i �'�a k�
x,� F"� �`"��'E i ;c t#S��
4� �I, •o ■AiR }If#.�, m 0''�? a �.t`
Tl• e,► Tiy�1i►�`1;i�1,A +p �r., a ���'1����� t�Ls��� h�'1 x ,�a 1�'"��' z
s aa
r
d,! jr r'� q I a ���Z�'� "�Ftst"#r°�.k a 1
N�lk lh ,iss i�rci�� kt'^:� �k a B�� t a
d� *l� .�i'� 'y► "tll' p 3 a t t. r+
�1' 9 '�i i 4 r,�"� x f
�1 t
j b �f �af r� s,,...�� s�����. f
t�.t�'r,* ��`d,� r. -n y
t/ u y�a;�. zi "i �`4�' -c;
I
1 m' 4♦ 4'♦ -a^�`+'e
f:� di. �I�� r� ��i:�r� t t
�"l�i1,.�� �t i y w ��'a s�
1 �1w4�.'i�►����► 1,M !i �.-�Ii11�11�t��e�111�__7�, L�F_ia► r+
�i► Y q �7 �a,�' a�
5 4 t y C r i r, z �A«"Sv t s
*0�� I e ��r x b r r '�r' t.� k y +�u fv k,„ .`z �i`h arv �a'� c e��4.�� ��9��'�4 e
ti'�r t ��r, z�.",�" �,�yJ.� -t ;"3�:�a�'k. �+�z Y y re.i 7
ryb c-7 w *:s u x `.s t t
ri,► 4 o. r
1 '��:'IrA 'y►�
,t s,. R
o I
a a �ar
�'r�
--CJ -49
a�a�� a r� r� c� o �o er a m a�c c+e b���e 4� ��c o o ���+�c fl�m o a am c� o 0 0 0 o u
M
r_.�
■l�r�1�1■ i
a+� .�i��.� �s...s�� �w
rii ri6d wr�rri �iirsi fri iri I Gwi ,r
o 4 ���"�'.�.������E„� .r.�`�il �J'�ll���� 11
,._a, Q
a
-y i a3' �l �L
oi►�-� i- i i h
w1
r
y it 1�
ti t �,1 ,-a
I' �Mf l n ��J
�1 .'S'. K 1 IY.:
'iJ
o, �Y_ ti�_ r �W'' k. �,:r J,%'r
a
o ji' J"r'+� I'��� ��',M;1!I�
u
E p
n'
i `i v
t r
d r. r. r-� �f 8 4 r y o
V V y✓ �,g r r N i �i'1�
o "a'� p
O� -ra 0 .r�. x r.r.�.. +e' e' T �1 �O
—i y jF
Q1����RI�i L'�_: .'9�,,1 :'*A�� t� r� P�I; ,w. .r•I��e=° Q
f.. i e. a ;r P P�( aw a�� a M� q p
s r
7' ■r
r j iuw
w
v
r x a
.r
3 i a �a ln e k ��R v.�
u
e
v
m
�i,�',�1 v v ��r r� i Na�
a o
"iL°� o
i r� a:,�„-', r �y,�. I�
�m
"�",1 It �I'.�, j_
II�II I 3
e ..'�:'7 ip�i
i� �i
i
e Y t� .i.iy� A �����I�� r
n
9 wriaG.
I 1' 1 I
r.
Ey I i� tj ,Ci i �T�:. P i 'C7 ��L �i "tilb
r
r a+a•��� i���e a ti i �r
o Q I I f� L �'�t `�O
..m.. 'r..e�a� .,1��������reii��rr�!'!�fl���r s=►.�,�
��!!.d=�� v s ,At:a�.-.e!sE i+++e _.,s• ar. ._rs...�t
t -������1�4���
<i 6 6> c�`tJ ��q o O C� C� C+ C G Cr C� 6� Fa m�� O o� U l�
�J `t:�` v u a�.i v
Gy O O 4 m p 4�� w G C� Siv +D �t� PD O O O fl [i O
*f.., y.
F
•��T��ewr
O �n�..Ai��pr nnr{:S� �.i .i� E�.,«.u{ F��:.��il�Ia .a� r�..�il 1 Iro" y o��..r ���.ao�� a u 4 r. r ar .�.��i e- n: e«-e,e..�: �,;'Ei
rv t�llllil ll(I�I{1I11111I1I1��fIIPII��tfII���IIIIIIE�III:ll�ll�l��16111111�1��lyl�l�lll�l
�wr ��i�t���(til���ui��,��[���ntE ii�ha�i�i�1���»��u�Einlr�tEifi k�tlu�EU��l��ivai� iiial�
'�1
o o
r r r. �r
J ��wr�
'a r t e O
O._.
`i.A�� A^7
.,ur, 'tJ l:►
..iw. �r��i�.,.�„�
�a .r�
�w "'sl� ii�"
4� a_r
d
Q �r�. ,�s. R` `�'O
r� �i �F�f..
y
t:; I, w J A,w,• w
sarr d
a i� �IIw�' �rsa _1��'+� 1 �j ,Vv
i fiY_"AiYYi��IIY����y�� �.SI�������� ����R'� v
i Ir i.+l 1
O
�;..r 1
y a�. r_z�.o ,,,�1 FS• �.iu t�.rru Yi lu� Ita� iu�.x.��� 1
r
ts,t R 1 e I 1� r i
pr �a e :'t.
a R/ 1 6�t I r 8/r s` �...i��ay;.. m 1
a
i 3
�,wAY
r Q
s... ,..4:.�...,.. �d
b
�i a...�.
0 Cr 6� 3 4 O r� �i7� O i4 G F� Cs� 6� G C; Cr L) rrD Ct 6 tD Ct O O D U
C✓ X:) .......-1..7 L.� W
Y�.�J lJ V� ;�j
4;r i✓
h s
�f Q
srr ee� Ets n� .i
ne En ���e a�a n�� 'aaA �ax
a
Q iI4M� !t6 BM! �.R4� ■i! iii i} *�'Z`
O tYl� i6� l.i,.pR6 iF� :a.i ■i
1��`�F p
�a� �E� �EE sa■ roa E��
ee�+ �ES •r� �r�- �sr' •�u ■�R� e�r �as e�a s� I
r�aNg ■�s ��s a�e r�cr ss o
1i a
e�ej ��E �Me sa■ �rM �e� x z�
e:a, ■aa :��e ees sst ue er■ eat o�e ��a ris ■�o ae
a�rr �r� icr ��a ■�r aa t
��.,t
r ��t`i� ■�e ■sA srA �sa �wa w�■ e� e■ ae e, a� a� e
1� �AS s�n er' au rea roo ,e■ ss{ a■ ia ae at aa f�
4��
;a s s i
F a�t m >a nP sa �a •s a s
!R ■R i�a �l U If� 'r&
Q i ;��6 �/t i� i■ i➢I �iz i aiil■
t a
rx
e� ■i am ef tr E 4 err na ■�a ��i Eee �ar ■e
■we
s! 0i �il 9i 11l11 {/1 !fi Y�f i�0 :Oi/ i�
p n v x 1 1 '3
E/H 6ki AR0 N7A# iR! iii i#1t 6Pi' �E�B AWM .RiB !fE .:IRi
RRP ffi6 '.M!■ C3E� i!� ii6�- 0!�
e w as� �a� e�ea eeE �r��
a s r
�tlY {i� ���4lt iit���it4 Eii�iM# t� C�
3 t1i�i t0■ .lbi iiE. !H ■E6 Oi• i� dM� is■ �t6■ eiY .ata i■ a r
i��( ilkl! 18! �tll! iiR '#E6 1111
d
!!f ..lfi 6iE: i0i Yii St9 j
,e� �e .tli� RER'�'9R6 NiR'�� [Ilpi k/t... �R■ i .s i�� HNB R6� fi9 �fOY �f6i� i�i
L 6 a .a c.". Gi: &w
a �at
�it3 �ii �8ii ■(f� ■if ii■ ifi ltt� ii■ fi9 ■i# �6B #/0 ri ■Li$
[ii� ��.9@! 66E !OR B!t iiA iAll� 6FM i9M.� M4i MMYE �iii
s !ii '�l�I�
v :t a r■ �.ii:�e
E! r� �ti if Ili �i e ifi' ■�E 8i! �ii9 itl9:. 0�i i
"4�� f• O ii i■ fi E! E
9 a� i9i, ■iL �i�..� ff� i11! '89i R ,ii
Q
i �a`=t_ f ,ra,,.: s i F y i o 'n�i
Elf IIE i■ f■ (i tt f s ��1; !li f[{ 1�� Y�t 4ii a:.�ttie
�iE �E i1F ■i iM,. f� i �wo� �07 i�/R fA! ��Nt� 60! ���liE z;■�=YIs
`z f s:.,. 3 s x,,." i a., w�r�e
�,.�-r*, -�.-�--r-.-,.- a--w-. —+r
�es es�� wet .At rtt ■aa oe �3�`
k:� �u nE c�e ■�s �ia ear �wr�.,�:���t'.
t :I rrrri
6 ��i ��i a�� ��a rs� i a r■
��a a�� i�t�t rxr: �r� n■ �a� z
C� �1�
r .�..�.t�.�
na M�r ee� rar eMt ��r es■
aaA'= a�ew n� e�a au tas t
E ■s�� mes ■�a ■ae .�a j=
C cr�, �c�a r�a r�■ wa� �y�
:#J�� z �tf� �l�R !!I_ q� !�t 11t! i-�� r+� i �iici�
t t i�t� ■�y �fYll ■tll II/� ■II� �ii M.'i F EM�� �Illf Si► il�� "!C/ �YS
��1 �16 t 3 CCR Ci. ..9� �a
y Y f v �g�
/f �i �•M 3 �az' f
tf �1 11� if i■ M! r_� IMl11 t�■ {/i Mll� �C! �lllly t� '�r7
n n t 3.v t s 4 d 7 sa iEi� �!f !!B 510 i�! �Bli 'w`� -�i.e��
e
6 aa u r y i
IIY !9 8� �i s-�. !f!i !i� Si& .116 EM4 �.CEB 16. n ■P-'7
11i t� f� i8. tli i�'. iR, �-s �i6� �S! Q6H /1■ �li
.z dr.;, ct�:.::.,.."r, t
v
z !i! Mi� !it rii E�■ 66i �0� x.•.^ I rr ��+irs
�:cea te! f�s ■�i.. Re6 !t#. YtY f s-„� 'f Eesf t!1! /Y! �.YMd ffiiE1 i/i i '���.7 ..cJ�
IICM �9i •196 iNl ��Yi
6 r{ 4 s�3 a�� t
LL isi� 0iO ii9� !9! 6t{ j Gi
4 '�..i ■!E �w� 9ti��. Rii �!N'. ii■ ■E■ iYf �.�5! �tM■ I!N R
t /#i f6� t08 ��OSi i/� �6fN !i
a s'� r
f
4 11�f !�E ".4lf F�i� i!! f/f��� Cill I�� ii9� !ii til .��i� C�Y �,il8 !f
x '�!!Q /EF IE� EY#�.... tli� ili�� y�i g/i� iie !�l �����t �!i '.lia (f
L' 9 i
��Er■ aa� r�■ :ax ss■ ui s�t r rr
n■ s�� raa tr■ ertl ■rn •�w asr; �sr a's ea� e�e ase cs
■is ais �e! ssa ms
a. rd �:�#m �'�ii lill i�; if �Y� r�
iB fll :■i t■ 'Bt� ►tD f!i i�fi YrY 6!■ llfi !r 2� I w 9
s g �y �t�� aryE trl s�f� aax !i[ cr@ rrrrC
i� ic .J r c.c c �,^r�� i r 5 a
il ii E� S ��i
���f !B E11 •11 P t
�11 t� r! !i /i i� i tM :■i i� !1�� i! Q Mrr
i�. .is t `.sk. »r 3.
�n- fi�;+ �x
K ile s!R #116 07R� 'tli� 16/L 3 E! ::i■ 8i f! Ei �■i
rt�t �orr �E■� ■e■ ■sr�, si� i
SA '#9 i■ ��..EE R� tN Il
`�s:��=Se� .xn .a.., xs,..,.,.
�i /i�� i�� li0! •�Ilt Fill �•!i ii
�.x� y N'd� /�il 1i! �.IIEI fit ��.t!!
t3 t ��c
,�f��� �E/ ■i! �EEY �wi
f��� tiY��F■ ■if��� i4! .�Ifl i0� i��!! [�i Rii Y[! .iS6 WY
k' tlplf' iti LL!0 6ii �./tN l�
t; f I
j� j` E
lki� !E6 U{' II/l.�. liE (�f' �fs tl��. ��tE II�� !p .•!4 �ii t:
�ItR !!i', lRi�� II�l�.� !�E^ r�i; �Yi iiC 9fi iEi '..ilM rIN i!! i1F11
p a I�i� ,..s.�. E�
y t a t s t
�i m—,
w r
w�A��rr t p
..y a...a.....�.�A...
..ri�i w�r+rlM ��q.�_.__�
f
+�p
1MR71i.Y11�ii 6MIG'�I� .r�+r� �+Wt-^""��
rr 'st�' «�R+�'
���'M�1IO�A .111##i
k �f�Ml� t
11MD i
I E r +�w.w�"
E I
f I I 4 r q� t
i
.,.,,I,,, i y
y I -.�e�1Mt—
i i i i 1 i i �nr�ww
I
I I: 1 i I I „�t« �`�o`�
f x
t
Y t 1 t i i r
b a
���N�
l� ww�wr���w�
s �r
wrr
f
-,..�a�►—�—k-4----------�--- ..�+r►
t
a
-�aMt "°i�+►
--.o�----� -��s�- +.4'�t C7�
«rr��ii
t
'��,y I
I I I I I 1
I I I I I
I ,M�,
�:z,«��� I I I
1 ���z��
f
LI1P7M�MnMtVMO 1 e 1 t t e t .�i
rrnwtrw y f b
wrw�sr
+!�wew�a.� �r�"i� +u �u i eiwa�rw�rww�n
a E r
M�nber int�oduced tfie follawing resoivation and �veci
it� �doption;
PLAt�T�fiING Ct}MhiISSION RESC}LUTIUP�I N4. 2U47'-02
R�SflLLTTIOi� 1�:EGARDING THE �O��h1�tED IIISPpSITIUI+T OF
I'LA�+TN�N�S COR+�MISSI4N APPLICATIC}N N�. 2U07-008 �UBMITTED BY`
S� CILNER (BRO�KI.YI�1 HOTEL P'AItTNERS, LLG�
WHE1tEAS, �it�r Cauncil Resolutian No. 2flQS-97 �t�►pted on 3un� 27, ?AQS
apprt�ved a re�ni� from C1A (S�rvice-0ffice, no heigiit l�mit) to Pt�IC1A �l°'lanned tlnit
DevelopmeutlService- C1�'ice, height limit) of a 6.2 �re site iocated on the east side af the
w�st leg of Earle Brown Drirre (tc� ��ressed as 630f1 Earle Brown Driv�};
WHEREAS, that proposdl comprehe�ded the rewa�ing of the above mentioned
property ar� development plan approval for a 2.50 raam hotei containiug a 1OQ se-at restatu ant
ar� 32,(?00 sq. ft. water park faciliry on the above mentioned site; az�i
'�iF..REAS, rhat sgecific development pl�nn is nc� ion�er bcigg considex�d for
implem�ntatian; a�;
�VHEREAS, Pl�ning Commission Application i�l"a. 2UQ7-+D�S cc�nsisti�ng c�f a
Pt7D a ment to allow canstrur,tion of a two buixldin,� �tel c.omplex ccrnsistin� of aa �igist
st+��+, 17S rcx�m ��ssy Suites botel ar�d 100 seat re�stacu�nt with a physical cc�n�tioa ta the
Earle Brcr�vn �eri#ag� Cenier has t�en proposed by Seth 4liver {�3ro4klyn Hc�t�e1 Par�rs, LL.C);
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission t�eld a duly caUUect public heating an Agril
?6, wh�n a s�ff report arrcl �ublic testimony re�artiin� the Pl�ned Unit Uevelopm�eanc
ndm�t wer� �iv�d; a�d
WHEREAS �e Plannin$ Cotnmissia�n cc>;a�ider�d th� Pla�ed Unit D�velo
azne� t in light +�f �ll testimony re,ceiv�ci, the C�ieliu� for Evalu�g Rezonings
con �n Section 35-2A8 c�f t� �ity' s Zaning Qrdi�aancc�e, the provis�ns of the Pl�� Unit
Deveiopm�nt t7rd�n�ncc� cu�� in Seation 3S-3S5 of t�e City' s Zo� 4rclinance, th�e
City' s Comp ive P�an a�xl Ciry C'ouncil R�sahrtion 1`�a. 2U�D5-97.
�+1flW, THE;REF�URE, BE IT RESOLVFD by the P�an�i�g Advisory �ssion
c�f ihe City c�f Brooklyn Ccnter tcy r�c�nn�e�d to the City Cauz�cil of #he City r�f Br�okt�rn Ce�
tt�at Ap�r ""cm �ta, 2(�7-0(� submrttad by Seth Oliver (Bro�l�yn H�el Partne�rs, L�} be
approvecl in light c�f the follo cvnsiderations:
Pa�c 1
1. 'The l�ann►ed Unit Uevelo�rneni is cotngatti.�Ie with C6e s#$ndaurds, Pur�ases a�a�
intent of tl� P"lanned Unit Development se�ic�n of the City' s Zoni�g {hd'u�urce,
2. The Pla�n�ti Un�t Dewelopm�nt proposal wilt aI}.c�w f�rr thc utiti�ation crf the land
in questiQn in a n�anner which is com�tible with, c�mplimentary tc> and of
c,�npara�ile intensity to adjacent land us+�s as well as t�ase p�errnitted an
swrrow�ling Iand.
3, The utilization Qf the property as propased under the P1an�ed Unit De�relogme�nt
Rez+�ning is considered a reasonable use c�f the property �td wili coaforrn with the
ordir�ance standards except for allowing a green s�tnp aiong the Ear1 Brov�m Dnve
rigt�t �f way that is less tl�an 15 ft. This ma�iGfi�i%o� from th� C1A ordinance
star�dard is justified on the lr�sis of the developm�e� p;lan being an �propnate plan
�ar this area �d that ic is off set or mitigated by various fac�rs ccm�i�ed in the
apprav+�d site pian,
4. The P Unit I3evelop�nt proposal is r.oinsider+�l consi+�te�t with the
�o clations of the City' s Comprehensive F�an for tlus azea �af the city.
S. The Planned Uni� Development Pi'�sal a tv b� a gcwd long ran$e uus+ee c�f
t�e eacisting ia�d a�i this �velop�rat ca�nn be consid�r�i a►n a�sse�t to tt�e
ct�mmunity.
G, In l�ght of the abov� consideratia�s, it is believed that Ehe GuisteUnes for
Eval�;ating Rezonings as contai�d in S�ct:ian 35-2U8 of t�e G�ty' s Zao�g
C?�dinauce are m�et and the propasal is, therefare, in t� best iaterest of the
c�mmnaity,
BE IT FURT�iER RESQLVED by tI� F Advisc�ry Ct�mrnissian nf the
City of �a�aklyn Ceuter t�r r�+ammend to t1� City Coui�cil that Applicaa�tion i�ta. 24d7-00� be
a�roved subject to thc foll�awing co�diticros and consir�ratiox�s.
l, T'h� ing plans are subject to review au� aippmval by Cl�itcial
wi� tu a�licable cpdes pr�or to t#� iss�a�ce c�f gern��s,
2. Gra�c�ing, dra►iinaSe, uti�tity ar�d erosiun cc,ntrol plans are sub,je� tc� review a�ci
apprcrval by ihe Cit�► Engin�eer �rior ta tla� iss of p�rn�its.
3. A s� pe�fumnaw��e ag�r� and �g fia�auci�a] guar in an t co
�e d� on cc�st shall 1ae sub pno�r t� tl�e is�suauce vF
b�uild°u�g permiis ic� assure completion of alt requ�red sixe am�nrc�v�zus.
4. B�i12 txu�a an� gutter sb�all be provicled amur�d all PazkinB at� driving ar�.
Page 2
I
5. outside #�ash facilitie,s and re�ofto ar on grc�u�i mech�wical
AnY d��al o P
eqtupment shalt be appropriately �ned fram view,
6. The bu�ding sh�t be equipped with an a�utomatic fir� extin�hi�g system to
me,�t NFPA �ta�rdards a�d shatl be carmected to a cen�al mumito device in
acccrrdance with Ghapter S af the City Ordjinances.
7. Undergrow�i irrigation shall be installed "m ali 1an�iscap�d areas ta �aucilitate site
m�ntenance.
8, Plam approval is oxclusive af all sig�ry which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City
Chdinanc�s.
The appliGant shall submit an as built survey of tb►e prc�percy, %u�rovements a�
utility s+ervice lines priar to tl� retease of Che perfonnanct� guarante�.
10. All work performed a�d materials usr�cci for con�mtctian of utiiiiies shall conform
t� the Ciiy c�f Brookl�yn Center Standard Sp�ifications arui Details,
11. The applicant s��all provide appragriat� erosion cAntrol durin� aQnstivctinn as
apprvved by �e CitY �8i�'�8 �a�rtme�t a�i obta�in an N�'DES consmu�tion
site erosion cantrol pernut from the ta Pallutit�n �;o�trol A�ez�+cy priar to
d�turbin� the site.
i2> applicant' s stor� water manager�ent plan s�l b�e approved by the Shingte
Creek �Vaterst�ed Management Comznission prior t� the is of build'uig
permits f�rr t� projec�.
13. 'The a�pl�can# �a11 enier intc> a PUD agr�tneut with the City of Brooklyn Center
to be ravi�wed ar�d ap�roved b�+ t�e Gity Ai�n�ney grior to th� iss�ance of building
'�s. Said a�r shall be filed w�th ibe title to #he Prc�pertY a�d shatl
�knowled�e the sgecific mc�di�ications tc� tta� C1A w�derlying zt�ni�g district as
we�1 as c�heie cur�ditians of approval. 'T7�e ent sha�ll fiu�her �ssure
sha ll fiu h
comgliauce with the c�velc�pment pians submitted with thi�s a�lication.
�4. '�e d�vel t planns shall bc modifie�t in tt�e fallowing maru�er.
a. Tc� prov� a lightin8 PLan ct�istent with tl� requir af Secucm
35-7i2 of ihe City Ordinanc�s r�azdin$ lighring.
b. �'ca provi�e a�rlan8 Plan co�sistent with t1� par requir �or
a t�tel a� restaurant c�m}alex or as3 a�rc� vff site par
Pa�e 3
an'snger�c�t that wili accomtnoc�te ti�e twa phase pmposal.
c, To provide the el'uYUnatian of all p�rkin� lat encr ts �ta the
public right of way.
l�. A�praval of the 7S room hc�tel indicated as fiuure develapm�nt on the site is
s�bj� ta thc Planhed Unit D�.welcfpm�rtt az�udn�ent prc�cess pri�c to the
issuan� c�f t�il� perinits for that proj�t.
16. "T"� prope�rty aw�r shall enter intu an agreetnemt frnr nancc� and
'vn af utility ami starm drai�age syste�ns, as a�rc�ved �y the Gity'
Er�gi�eer, to insure continued maintenan+ce of o� site utilitie�s a�i storm water
faciiities.
17. The Fropert� aw�r shall dedicaie a draina►�e a� utility ent c�ver all
porti�ns of the storm water detention pa�d within the hc�l P�P�Y
a�proved by �he City F.angi�eer.
D�t+e C�'
ATTE3T:
The m�tiQn for th� �dc�ption of the foregoing resotution was duly sec��lerl by member
an�d upcm vc�te being taken ther�n, ttte fottowia�g vc� in favor
tl�r�af:
a� the foliowing vated agaiust the sau�:
w pon sa�i resolution was t�eclar+od duly passed anci ad
M�nt�' Crayd�n Boeck introduur.e�i the fc�llowing resolution anfi
move� its �dapt�n:
1'LANT�II�1'C CO�SSION RESt3LUTi�ft�i NC1. 2U0'!-02
1�FSEILUTI{}�+i �EGARDING TI�E RECQ N�T3ED DL"Pt�STT'IC�N (?F
PLANfN�NG Ct)A+Ik[ISSI4N APPLICATI{7►N NC3. 2U�7-0E?�B �[7BMIT'I�1Ct BY`
SE;TH f�LNEIt {BRC�KLYN HOTEI. PAR:TNF�tS, LLG`�
Wf�EREAS, City Ccw�il Resa�ludon Ato, ?.t1�5�97 adapt�d ctn June 27, ?.U05
�ov�i a re�z�i�ng fmm �lA (S�rrvice-Oi�ce� beight limit} to PUDICIA {P Unit
Devei tfS�ervice- t}f�Ce, uo t�eight limit) of a 6.2 acre sice lt�catc�d on the �t side of t�ee
wes�t leg �f E�rie Browu Dr�vc (w be addresscd as 6300 Earle Br�rwn I3rive),
WHEREAS, that Praposal comPre tl�e r�nni�g c� the abave arentin�d
prt�p� ��v�l plaa aq�roval €ar a 250 c�oom �I r�ntaining 100 seat restat�ant
a�d 3�,IX� sq. ft, water park ��cility an the �bove rnentioned sitc; and
4 ��`HH�REAS, that specific develcygment plan is �0 1on�er being considered for
i�lem�on; a�u3;
V�JI�R�AS, Plaatiing Coaunission A�lication �+To, ?,0�7-t1�8 consisting of a
PUU AIC�1�iC!!t tQ �IUW CO��'�Ct10II A� 8 tW0 �1tJ�� COti�1��CX COIISIS of an eight
story, 1"75 room E y Sui#�s �tel and 100 seat restawrant witla a physical c.o n tc� the
Earle Brown Heritagc Center has pro�a�Cd by Sc�h C?�ver (Broc�kl�m Hcacel s, LI.C);
WH �.5, the P' g Cona�missian held a: duly �blic �eariag o� Apri1
Zb, 2Q07 whcn a sta�f re�c�rt a�i �blic testimonY reSaz'dia$ the PI�d ilmit Devel
were received; a�i
WHER�AS, the Plaiwiqg Couunisaion considercd ihe Ua�it T�ve�o
r�u�st in c�f all ny raxivec�, th�e Gui�l�iin� for Evalua�tiwg Rezonings
+co iu n 3S-?A8 of tt� City' s Z+oning 4rdinawce, provis�s of Pla�cd Unit
i�ve� +Qrd' co in Scction 35-3�� of th� City' s?�+c3iuflg 4rdi�nc+�,
City' Co� iv�c P�an a�d City Council Rssoiu�n No. 20�S-�T.
t+TC1W, THETtEF�QR�, BE IT RESt)LYEI) by t� P g Advisory G� ion
of tbe City of B�aklyn t� reconu�nd to t�e City Cow�il af the City af Brca�klyn Center
L�t 1�►�? II �O. Sit�tt� by $Ct�l {��lY�! {$i00�iyII �(3tC�
a�roved in li�ht of thc follov�rin� consiclerations:
Page 1
1, 'T�1C I�� U1131t �.}Cir�lt� l3 E:t3tl�18i1�IC Wit�i t�1C StBIlt�Bt`d3, �tlt�(35�8
i�ent of the P1a�e+d Unit I)evela�pment se�ic�n of the City` s Qrdi�ance.
2. "T'he P Unit Drevelopment proparsa! will atlow for ct� utili�n of t� lan�l
in question in ma�ncr which is c�a�ble wich� coutpti�tary to and c�f
ca Ie �nt�nsity to adj,ace�nt l�i as well as cl�e pertnitt�xi nn
surraun+ding �nmd.
3. 'Th� utilizatian �f the progerty as prop�sed urrrfer the P"i�n+�! CTnit Dcvelo�p�ent
R�ni� is c�nsaidered a reasooabk use c�f the pr�perty a�d wiU conform w�ith t�e
ordin�nce sta�ds�ds e�cept far allowing a gre� strip �long t�ae Fari Br�wn Drive
rig�t of way t� is less than 15 ft. T:tzis naodifitc�aiau firt�m the �lA ordinaucs
standard is jus c�n the bssis of tl�e dcvel plan beiug an a�r�r� p�
for this area a�rd t�t it is off set or mitig�d by va�rio� Factors a��tained in t�
a�raved s�te pta�at.
4. 'I'he Plann�d iJnit Development pr is cans�rec� +ccrosisteni with t�e
recou�ne�lations a�f the City' s Compr ive Flan f+�r this azea +�f city.
5. Thc Uni� De,welop�nt pmp+� to be a�aad Ion� tau$e tts� of
tl�e exi�sti� 1a�d a�i thi� dsvel can be �nsider�d an asset to the
6. in light of tt�e above considerations, it is believ�i d�at th� Guidelin�s for
Ev�Iu�ating �gs as contained in S�ction 35-2Q8 of th� City' s�nin�
flrdi�aac� are t�t a;ad che propQSal is, t��re, in t�e besi is�terest of tt�
'ty.
SE IT FURTH�R RFSOLVED by tt� Planuiag Advi�ry Commissio� af the
City �f Brapkl�++a w nd to the City +Cc�un�il t}�at Applic�ion No. ?A09'-0t�8 l�e
v�i subject ta tt� fo�lowiag canditions and �onsic�eraticans.
1. Ttte ing plans are �bjcct to r�.wiew a�l �►al by the Building C?�ciai
with co ap��icabl� �aies prior w the iss�n,e� c�f permits.
G`, utiliEy and er�it��n 1 p a� suhj� t� rev�c�v and
�roval by t� �itY �8� P�r to t� is ,e �af 't�.
3. A site perfc� agreement and supportin$ fi�Cia� t�ee i�► aa tc�
t�e 'ned based on cost estinnaces a�sil l�e su�m��ci prior w tbue issttaace c►f
b` germmiits to assuts aomplction af a�1 r+�,uire�i sit,� improv t�.
4. �3-b12 curb �ci s�all be pmvid� amw�d all parku� a�nd drivi�g
Page 2
Any autside trask� disposal facilities and rooftog or on grou�d rnec,��uical
�quti�n�mt shall 1�c appraPriately acreened fmm view.
6. 2'#� l�i�din� sh�ll be �quiPged with an automatic fire �xtin�uishin� syst�m ta
me�t IwtF'PA stan�i�rds and shall bc co ta a��at�al m�aitcsci�tg �evice in
�ar�an+c� with Chaapte�r S of tt�e City Chd'u�nces.
7`. tJ�dergrcwu�ti irrig�ution shall be installed in atl lau�d�peci areas w faci�litat� site
��in�nan+cc.
8, Flan a�prov2tl is e�lusi�+e of all sig�ery which is subj� W Chagter 34 of tt�e Gity
C�rd�n�nc�s.
9. Tl�e apgi� s�atl sub�niit an as built survey Qf tt� propezty, imAmv�ents a�d
util�ty s�cvirae lines prior to the rele,as�e of the per.foranauc� t�e.
10. All work �erfora�+ct an�d materi�als used far c,onstntction ��utilities shait conform
tci the City o� Broaklyn Center Standard Sp�e�ific�tions and Iletaals.
11, "1'he applic�t ahall prc�iru�c a�opriate er+�si�n cuntmt dt�ring const�rruction as
approv�i by the City Engi�ring I�partr€ne�,i a�d �btain. an NFDES ca�s�n
sate emsion contcol permit from thc M' ta PbllutiQn Contmi A�et�c:Y Prior tn
�istu�rbing tb� site.
12, 'T�e a�li�aut' s stc�rm water nlanag plan st�all be apprc�vcd by the Sl�ingle
Creek Wate�sh�d iVianaget�cni Comtnissi+� prior io �c �su�ce of �itdistg
ts for thi�s proj�t,
13. Tt�c applicaut si�ail enter i�to a PUD �mt witt� the Gity of Src�yn ��r
tci be reviewai a�d �►roved by the Ciiy Attan�y �rior to tI� is�uan� of l�il
'�s� a nt shall be filed wi� t�e title to the pm��rty s1�all
ack�wledge tt�e �pecific �xii.fications to the C1A lying z+�� districi as
well as other co +�n�s of approval. �,a�re�mcnt s�aii ft�tt��r
c�a►�lia�c�e with tt�e devel plans subr+ni�ted wiurh this "�ic�n,
14. T�ue c#+evelopment plaz�s shail be modi�ied i�► t�te following �nan�:er.
a. Tu provide a ti;ghting plan c�o�istent with the r+�uir af Se�ti�n
35-? 12 €�f t� City Ordinances regardin� li
b. To prc�v�de a P�`�S P� with t�ae g r��r for
I a�� ar�i re�autant c;onaplcar or a� cypriat+t oi� site
xx
Fage 3
aztan�eu�ent ihat will �ccommvds�te the twt� pha�e propnsal.
c. To provide the elimination of a�l par'king lc� e int� the
public righ�t af way.
I5. Appmval of tl� 7'S room �Otel i�dirart�d a�s fitture cievelopme� o� th� sit� is
subje�t to the Unit Deve p grior w t�
i�suauce of t�aiiding peru�its for that praj+xi,
1C�. Thc grc�pecrty ow�' shail e�r into an agree�ment for tr�aiz�tenan�e a�d.
inspecti+�n of utili�y and storm drainage syste�ms, as appr�ved by the Gity
Engine�r, ;to insure cx�ntimued mainteataance of o� site u�ilities at�l st�rm wa�er
fa�ilities.
17'. The praperty owaer sbaU cle�icate a drainage and utility ea�ement aver atl
porti�ns of the storm water detention p��d witt�in the i�el propert3+ as
a�ppr+�ved by the City Fngi�er.
I)ate hair Pro Tena
AZ'T'ES'�:
S�;�tary
'I`he �tir�n for tb�e a�iapti+�n af the foregoing rc�lution was duiy secasui� by u�mb�r
1 and u�pan vcxe being talc�n th�rec�n, tt�e f�►liow�ng vc�tc�d in favor
tl�r�f: CCt�aair Pm T� T'im R�cl�, Com�nissioners Grayd�n B+aeck, �r Fo�i, �b+el Lun�d
a�d �el�a Yauag.
a,�ci t� fullo vut,ed a�iuu�tt tfi� No�
w pun said was t�clared duly passed and ad�p�teed.
M�ber irmodu�l tb�e fio�lawing r�talution az� �rv�ri
its adc�ptiflr�:
RESULUTION �IO.
RESt3LUTION RE+�ARDING TH� U�,SPOSITI(?N Q� PLA�+INING
Ct�I�IMMISSIC3i�T AFPLICATION NQ. 2t)(}7-t�A8 SUB�+II�I`ED BY S�;TH
t3I�IVER (BRC�I£LY1�T HtJTEL PARTI'�ERS, LLC}
WHEREA�S, City Cow�il Resolutian No. 2405-97 �dapted an Jux� 27, ?A4�5
apprQVed a re�ning fi�om C1A (Se�vice-0ffice, height limit) ta PUDlC1A (Pt�u�ncd Unit
L�ve1 t/S�ervice- Uffice, n�r h�ight li�nit} of a 6.2 a�cre site located on t�e c�st side of the
west leg c�f Earle Brown I)rive (tv be a�ddressed as 6300 Earle Brown Drive);
"WI�E;REAS, P�ai� �mPr�b� the rez+ani�ng +�f the abave tnentio�
prapertY at�d development plan appmval for a?.SO rc�m hc�tel ctiutauu�img a l0U seat restaurant
aYUI a 32,t�t1 ft. v�+a#er park ��cility an tt�e above �tic�� �it�; az�
WHEREAS, tt�at sgacific c�velop�nt pla�n is lc�n�er being r.o�siclered for
impl�ntation, a�d;
WHFRFAS, Plan�aing Co�nission Ap�lic�tiou No. 2f147-OU8 co�sistit�g af a
PUD a�uu�dment to allow �onstnutian of the first phase of a two buildi�ng hoteti compl�x
consist�ag of an eight su�ry, 115 room Exnbassy S�ui�tes �1 and 10U �eat with a
physical co n w the Earle �r�rwn Heritage Cente� b�as baen p�pc�se�i by �h Oliver
(E�rcwklyn Iiotel P�rtners, LL,C); a�d
WI�EREAS, the Planning Commission held duly ca�led p�blic h�aring on April
26, 2('�'J w�en a� repo�rt anucl public t�aay reg�urdiug the Plana�d Unii Devel
ent were re�ived; a�
WHEREAS, t� Ptaun�i� Cammission r nded approval of A�lication N�n.
�-�IO$ P�i�II�, CflIDiYll8Sl0�1 RCSOIl1Lk3A N4 Z�C}7-02 c�n April 26, ?.:fJO 7, aa�t
�F.�.A�" C1L3► COUACII COASI�t.`I� A�1I1 `C�UOII N4. 11S
14, 2{�7
WHE;REAS, the City Cou�cil consideared thi+s P Unit Devel
a� t in light of all t�tinnony received, the {.�udetin�es fa�r EvaiuuaLing ite�onings
r�o in Se�ion 35-2� +�f the City' s Zoning O,cdi�ce, the grovisic�ns a►f the LTnit
Deveic�rment +Urdi�ance cc>��tained in Searon 35-355 of t� City' s Zvning Chdinan�, tt�
City' s C"tm�r�hensive Plan, +City Cou�cil Reso�uti�n Na. 2Ui}5-97 a� th�e P�anniag
Commission' s recc��ndations.
ReSUIU#iOn NO.
NflW, THEItEFURE, BE IT ItFSC}LVED by tt� City Cot�il af the City of Broakiyn Cent�'
that Applicatic��n Na, 2�7-OQ8 subauaed by Seth Oliver �r�klyn Hate1 Partners, LLC} be
a�rrowed in li�ht of the following c�nsicier�tians:
1, The Platmed Unit Develop�nt is compatabie with ttt� stand�t�s, F�upc�ses a�d
intent a� t�e PLanu�ed Unit Devela�pment section of the City' s�oning Ordi�anc�.
2, The Pta�ned Unit �evelapment propasat will allaw f+�r th� utilizat�n of the 1�aand
in question in a ma�nner which is co�ibie with, complunenta�y to a�d o�
able int�nsity to �jacent land uses a�s well as thase pernutt�ed on
surr+o�ding la�d.
3. The utili�tio� of th�e property as prapased w�der the Pl�nn�ci Uni� Develvp�
Rczoning is co�si�eerecl a reasonable use of the pxc�erty and will canfonn with the
ordira�nc:e staudards ex�x for allowing a gr� strip a�Iong the F.arlBrown Drive
rigi�t of way that is less tl�an 13 ft. This mc�dificatiom fcom the C1A ordinance
sta�daed is 'ustified on the basis of th� de�el n# lan au r riatc lan
1 P �'P P
f4r this azea az�l that it is off se�t or miti�atext by varic�us factars contaun�d in the
approveci site plan.
4. The P Unit Deveiapment prc>pasal is cc�nsi co�sist� with th�
re�ommendationr of the City' s Compreliensive Flan for #his area of the city.
I S. The P Unit Development PruF�sa1 t� be a�+aod long rang� use of
th�e exisiing land aral dus development can he considere�d am asset W the
ct>ta�uni�ty.
6, I� li�ht t�f tbe ab�v� �oasiderations, it is belie.wed that the t�#uideliu�es fvr
Evat Rezonian� as contaiined in Sect�io� 3S-?A8 of t,he CitY' s��ning
{)rdinau�e a�re met and the proposal i�, therefo�re, iw t�e bcst intere�t af thte
comm�wity.
of tt� Ci of Bro�l
BE Tf FURT`HF.,�t RESt�LVED b d� �i Cow�c�l
£Y Y�
Y
r that A�lication No. ?A(Y7-4Q8 be approved subject to the fc�ll�wing +ct��aditions a�d
consid�rations.
l. ''3'he b'' plans aze subject to review a�d approval by the Bualdi�g Uff�ial
with respect w a�licable cades priar to ths �suaa�nce of p�nnits,
2. Cxradi�g, dr�inage, utility a� erosion cantrol gla�ns �re subject to review az�l
val by the +City Engi�er prior to t� i�s� of p�ruts.
Resol�tion No.
3, A site perfonn�e agreement and supparting fin�ucial �uaza3nzee u[ an ann�utxt t+G�
b� deterimin�d bas�d an cc�t estimates shall be svbmitted �uior to the issu�� of
builcling perimits ta ass�re camgletion af all re�uired si� improvements.
4. B-612 curb aud gut�er shall t� provided arcn�ad all parkin� aa� driving azeas.
5. Any vutside #rash d�spasal fa�ilities a�i rr�oftap t�r c� grou�l m�ical
�ment sl�ali be appropriately screened frc�m view.
6. 1'l�e buitdia� �ha12 be equip�ed with an autatnatic fue e��ng�isl�g syste�m to
meet NFPA st�ndards ar�d sriall be can�d to a�n�tral moniwrin� device in
accordat�ce with Chapt�er 5 af the City �rdi�.
7. U�tergrou�t irrigation shaEl be installed in all lan�isca�d areas tn facilitate site
rns�in
8. Plan appmval is e�clusive af all signery wtuch is svbje�t to Chapter 3� af the Ciry
Urrlinances.
9. 'The a�licaut shall submit an as built stu�vvel► af the gt�perty', imProve�me��s a�i
utility servi�+e tir�s priar to tl� rel� of t6e perfc�rmance guar�tte.e.
lU. Ali w�rk performeci a�d materials used for cansuvction of uti�itic� s1�all confarm
to the �ity of Brtwklytt Center Standarc! Sp�c'�ficativus ancl ��tails.
11. Th� applicant shall provide �ropriate erosian ccm�l du�riug consiructio�n a,s
apgnoved by the CitY �8���8 �P'�n�nt.�nt aa�i ol� a� NPDES const�tion
�it� +�rc�sion co�rul permit from the M' ta Palluticm Contral AS�Y P�or to
t�isturbi�eg the site,
12. Thc applicaat' s str�rm water managc�nernt glaa shatt be apgrflved by #h�e Shingle
Cr�� Watersheci 14ianagem�n�t Commissi�o� pnor to the issciaia�ce of bui�diung
p+e�rmits for thi� pzb!ject.
13. 'Th� ap�iicant shall e�ter into a PUD a�,r t with tl� City c�f B�k�ys� C..e�utcr
icx be revieweci a�ui a�proved by the City Attorn�e� prior to the i�saa�nce c�f bui�ciing
permits, Sa�d a eni shaU be filed with the ti�1e to the propert.y a�d s�all
�kna►wle�dge #he spe�ific modifications to the ClA �u�derlying r�ning districct as
well as �her cx��litians of approval. T� a sh�ll fiuther assur�
lian�e vvitb t� dw�+elopm�ent plans submi�l with this �li�atio�.
14, The devel plaas shall be modified in the follc�wing
Resolutio�t l�to.
a. To pr4� a lighting plan cc,a�isLent with tl�e requirements of Se�tian
�5-712 crf the Ciry Ordinan�es re�ardin,� 2i$htin�.
b, Ta prc�vide a parking plan �nsist�u with the �'king req�ureme�ts for
a hotel a� restaurant con�tte�c or an �propri�ate off site park�g
arr�emeni th�i will aa;ammodate t�e tv�►u pI� parap�sal.
c. To provide elinnin,ation of all parking lawt encrc�ach�nents ivata the
public right of way.
IS. Appz�ov�l of the 75 room hotel indicated as futtue develap�ern on ihe site �s
subject ta tt�; Planned Unit Developme�nt am��nt proce� prior to the
issuua��nce ef bui�tdi:ag pennits for that project.
lb. '1� pro}�erty c�wner shall enter urta au a�reem�e� for maintenan�e and
inspection of utility and storm drainage sys�, as a�mved by the City
E�tgi�a+�er, to insure contin�uod mainten� vf on site utiliti��.s a�d storm water
�ilities.
l�'. "�'he pro��erty ow�r shall dedicate a drainage a�i uEilaity �asem�a�t over all
partions ,�f the stonm water detention pc»d wiihin the hotel PropertY as
a�roved by the City Engincer.
T?ate 'Tim VVillson, Mayor
ATT�:
Ciiy �rk
The �tion f�nr the n of the for�going re�iution was duly s� by me�ber
a� apon votc bcin� th�r�n, the f�llowi�g vc►t�i u� favor
thc��of:
a�l the followi�g vcYted a�ins# t1�e
wh�r�upon saxd r+�h�tion was dcclarcd duly �ssod and adapt�d.
MINUTES C)F 'THE T'Itt3CEEDINGS OF T'HE PLAI"�T!'�TING CC�I��SST+4N
4F THE +�TTY dF BIt04KLYN CENfiEI� 1N THE C�UNTY (}F
H�NI�E�'IN AND THE STATE OF ��lNl�t'LSOTA
STUDY SESSIQN
APRII, 26, 20U7
CALL TO t3RDER
The Planning Comrmiission meetiug was called to order by Ghair Pro Tern Roche at 7.02 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Chaar Pm Tem Tim Roche, Co�unissioners Crraydon Baeck, Gazy F�rd, Rachel Lwzci, and Uella
Yt��g w+�re p�ent. A1so pr�sent were Community Uevelopment Uirec#or B�ad Ht�;ff�u�,
S�r�;t�ry the Planning Commission/Planning and Zaning �pecialist Ronaid W�, and
Plar�nin� Co icrn Recardirrg Se�retary Rebe�ca Crass. Chair S�an Ralui and C€�mmission�r
Michael Parks were absent anci �ccused
APPRI�VAL OF MIl�[JT'E� APRII.12, 2+(�7
There w�s a motion by Gommission�r Ford, seconded by C4�nissioner Bc�k,
to aPProve the minutes of the A��il 12, 20Q? meeting as submitted, The motion passad.
Commiasioner Lund abstained as she w�s not present at the meeting.
CHAIIt'S EXPLANATION
Chair Pro TeYn I�oche e�cplai�e�d the Planx�ing Com�ussion's role as an �visury bady. 4ne of
t3�e t;ommissAOn's fiu�ction� is tc� hold public h�arinzgs. In the matters concemed in the�e
�aearings, �he Cammission mak�es re�ommendations t+� the City Council. The City �ouncil makcs
all final decisions in these matters.
AFPLICA"TIC}l� NO. 20U7-0(?$ SETH OLIVER BROOKLYN HUTEL PARTNEIt�� LI.�I
+Chair Pro Tem ;t�he introcluc�d Applicatian No. 2�7-048, a r�quest fcrr Plann+ed Unit
Aevelopment Amendmeant �nnd development plan approval of th� first ph�se of a twc� buildin�
hotel r,�mpiesc consisang o�'aa� eigaat story,175 room hote�, �t'� seat r�t�aurant and a� encl+c�d
c�onn�ction to t�� �arte Br�w� Heritagc C�nt�rr.
Mr, Warcen pr+esenteii #he staff re�rt describin,g the lacation c�f the pmp�rty and the praposal,
{5fe P Cor�ussion Inft�rmation Sheet dated 426-46 and the Airector o� Public
WorkslCity Enginee�r's memo 423-07, for Applicatit�n No. 2+�7-UU8, attached.} A
1'lan�eci Unit Develc�rment rez�siing from C 1 A to PUD/C 1.A, and deveiopme�t plan �pmvat for
a faur and s+ev� stary, 2S0 roor�a hot�el with a lUQ seat restaurant and a 32,UOt? sq. f�, water park
inclt�din,� au enciose� walkway �naection to the Earle Brow� H�ritage Ceater was appmved fur
this same sitt� by th� City Cuuncil ux►der Pianning Co�nmissio� Resulutio�t N'o, 24�}5-I�' an June
27, 2005. Th� appfir.�t is nc� longer pursning the hoteUwater P�rk lmap�al and is nc�w s��in� a
I'UD �mensi�nent to allcr�v a#wo building hotel complex with c�a�e building containin� 17S hc>tel
r+�rms and a 1t�1 se�t restauracnt a� the s�cond building with 75 rc�m�.
425-U7
Pa$e 1
�LJ�3Li� HEARING APPLICATI4N NO. 2007-0U8
Th�re was a�wtiun by Cammissioner Ford, seconded by Gommissivner Yaun�, ta apen the
public hearing c�n Application Na. 2U07-�8, at 7:45 p.m, The mation passed ausly.
Chau Pro Tem Roche called for comments &om the public.
Mr. I��t t�liv�r, fatthher af applicant Seth bliver, spoke an beh�f af the �pPlicant. He stat�c! that
he �r��iously ad+dr��d the Comamission in 2W5 re�aarding this A�plica�ian. �Ie respanded to
the Cc> iox�'s que�ticros r+�$azding the locatiott af the trash container which witl be
inside the building. H+� add� that a7ny electrical deviceas, or the �sformer, wi� screen�
praperly and the lig�in8 plan will tae pmvidect at a�a#er date �,rtd all �requirements will �e met.
Commissianer Bc�ck asked Mr, C3liver if he was familiar wit� the F..ngineer's r�rt re g an
emergency averflow path and a�ked for clariScation regardi�g what was submitted on the plan.
Mr. Brimn Morse, S7A Arcbztects, addresaed the Comm.ission and pc>inted aut on the pL�cas where
the surge ovsrflpw areas are lc�ate�i on the site in tt�e �nd'u3g az�a.
Coinmissioer Boeck pc�inted out to the applicant that the Engine�r's re�urt stated that an
ad�uat�ly cc��strcicted emerg,ency overflow from th� d�artion pond out tc� Eazle Bruwn Dniv�
was reqiured and it shouid b� sometttin� otlaer than a pipe,
Comrnissione.r'Yo�ung inquired c�f t�ie applicant as to which acc�ss wc�uld b� us�i dwwr��ng
c� ctic�n. Mr. Morse respQnd�: that the issue has not l�een discuss�i with tbe ccynt�ctor but
pmper use ofthe site dunng const�uctaon will be followed with access at une er tw+� to�ons
being used and ccyntmit%�g tr�ffic i� and out as well as s�iiment control.
Commissisrner Ys�wn� fiarther asked tlic a�plicant a�aut their pla�ns fur a rain �de,� dwring
construction. Mr. I�Ior�e r�ponded that such d�sils are Ieft to be disc wi#h t.�� contractor
and the Gity Et�gi�eer aGnd to the best of his lcnowlcdge a rain garden will not 1� used.
C`haiar Prc� T�m Rc�hc inquirc�d as t+� the exterior colars o� the pr�pc�sed bt�i�cling, Mr, Mn�
n�led t1�at the b�.ilding will be c��np�i�mentazy ta, but not inte�xded ta match, t:�e Earle
Bmwn Hcriiage Center since they will be cc�nnected bux wil� have a reddish �mwra color with
s�ome r+�d accelat.
Chaar Pra Tem Roche ask+eti the applicant when theY Progose ta break ground. Mr. Morse
r�spo that thsy plan �o break grc�urid this summer and hope to be open for busin�s by June
ZOUB,
No �oth+er gersons from the public �eared before the C�mmission the public heazing on
Applic,,at�ion N'o. �t�7-��D8.
CIASE PLJ.BLiC HEAR.ING
There was a mo#ic�n by C` ion�er Lund, secondetl by Canma�i�ssiamer Ford, tci clase t�e
public h�g cm Applica�ion No. 21�0�-008, at 7:58 p.m, The m�tion ou�ly.
4-2b-0'7
Pag� 2
`X'he Chair called �`or fiuther +c�scussion or uestions &om the Cammissianers.
q
The Commi�sion+�s in�rposed ncr objecaons to �ppruval af the .Appiication,
ACTiON T� REC{}MM'END AP'PROVAL QF A.PPI�ICATIt��+I Nt). 200►�'-{�8
'Th+�re was a motion by Ct� ''vner Baeck, secon�+CCi by Cvma�issianer Lund, t� aPProve
Plauxning Commissis�n Resalution No. 2007-02 regarding tlae r�ccrm�mendecl di�itic�n of
Pla�puung CamYnissi�n Applic�tic�n No, 2flp7-008 submitteci by S�th Clliver (Broaklyn Hotel
Partners, LLC).
Votir�g in favvr: Chau Pro T+�m Roche COIIfA3IS�lOII£T'S, Baec�, Ford, Lwnd, and Yovng.
The matian passed unanimously.
Th� Cauncil will consider the a�►plica�ian at its May 14, 2fJ0? m�. The apglieant must be
present. Major cha��es to the �a'Plication as reviewed by the P g Cammis�ion wi�l r�quire
t�at the applicatic�n be retwTted to the Commission for r�cons�deration.
APPLICATI�3N I+T�. 2{}07-UU9 BROOKLYN CENTER CHL7RCH OF T�E NAZARE1tiTE
�ha�ir Pm Tem Rc�he intr�oduced Appticatian Na. 204?-009, a re�uest for Sp�cial Use P�rnut
and Site and Building Plan approval for a#hree phase church a�ddition and parkang lat expaasion
at 5{�1 73'� Avenue North.
Mr. W�rren presented the �f'r�port de,�ribing the Ic�catian of t�e pmperty and tt�e pmposals.
{S� Pl g Ct�minission Inf�aatipn Shect clated M2fr�7 aztd the Dir�tor of Pub�ic
''UVorksJCity F�n,ginc:cr's memo dat�d 4-24U7 for Ap�Iic.atic�n Nca. 2007-049, attached.) Mr.
W�r�n �x��+e� that the appl�cant pr+oposes to do the additions and alteratians in thr�e phas�s,
Commussianer Z.und asked Mr. Wan�en if there was �lequate lighti�g o� the site. Mr. Wazxe�
respvndad that he felt it was ad+�uat� as �hown on the plan.
Comm�issiQner'Young askad for fiu�er clarification on the scz�ing requ�rem�nts. Mr. VVarren
responded tlaat s�rcening shciuld t� not confused with sccurity. There az� no provisions in #he
city ordinanc,es that require this F�ropertY to be se�eure but r�ther i# has to m� screening
req�irem�nts in ar�as vwrheze it abuts residendal pmperty. He noted th+� applicant is requesting
that he be allowed to p�avide landscape screening ra#her thaa a 6 ft. higtz 4pac�u� fence or wa�1
a�ong tb:e we�t �id� wher� th� pm�^�erty abuts R1 z�ne+d pmper�ty.
PITF3LIC H��ING APPLit;ATIC3N N(). 2007-IXI9
Thesrre was s mvtic�n by Co io�►er Lund, secondeci by► �ommissic�ner Fard, to t�en the public
g c�r� Applic,ation Nc�. 2(�'7-t�9, at 8.48 p.m. Th�e motio� 'm+ausly.
C'haur Pro T�m R�che ca�l� ft�r comments fram the public,
NIr, Deat� Poits,10269 Yorktovv�n L�e, lwiaple Gmve, pastor of the church intrt�duc�+d lf to
the Commission.
426-07
P�;g� 3
Commissioner Ford asi�ed if tbey l�ave a plan to sc:reen the �art.�erly prt�perties. Afir. Potts
re�a�d�l i�a�# they �tan to fill in that area with Evergreens,
C'hair Pro T+�n R�che asked abaut the location of a sidewalk area le�ding to the b�,s sh�lter.
Pastor Potts r�nc�e,� tbat it atlows then acccss to a pmpased dre�p� off lane during Phass� I and
a possible area for tr�sh enclasure i�n the future.
Chair Pm Tem Rc�he pointed out khe City Engineer's ca�un�nts regardin� th�e gropc>s+�d
reten#ion basin specifi��r t�►at it �nay nat have to be �s d�.p as it is propased which cauld
crea:te cost savings. Mr. Potts not�ci tt�at he had review� the City En,gineer's comm�nts and
tt►ey wc�uld be 1�►king at that ar�a again in light of hi� ccf�neuts.
Chair Pro Tem Roche asked if they have an estimated time line to r.c�mplete all tla� phases. Mr.
Po#ts responded that they do nat have a time line in mind for the e�tire praject but hope to have
Phase I co�nple#�i by the end af the year. Chair Pro Te�n. na�ted that this church has nat seen a�ny
improvert�e�ts in years. Mr. Potts acknowiedg� that �u1 str�ted �haut �ince this parkitng lot wiil
also be used by M�o Traa�,sit for a Pazk and Ride lot, they will be as�isttng with some ofthe
cost to th� impr4vements of the parking lot.
Chair Pro T�na �:to�he su ec� t� Mr. Potts that they consider `stePPing up' the la�ndscaping to
create a marc aesthe�ically pl�sing look to the azea,
No c�ther }aersons �irom the public �arai before thc Cammission during the publie hearin� c�n
Application No, 2{HI7-049.
GLOSE PUBLIG HEA�C
There was a motion by C'hair Pm T�m Rache, second�i by Camrnissioner Farti, #o clase the
public hearing on Application No. 2+�7-00�9, at 9:03 p.m. Tf�e motion passed un�imously.
T'here was discussic�n by the Comrni�ssion regarding fenciA� and screenirig on #he site �ad
wheth�r add�tional scm.cnYng should be a rtquirement, It �vas the consensus af the Commiss�on
to add a condition of �mval #hat would r�uire both a 6 ft. opaque fenc� and a�itiazial
�nif�us tree� alt�ng the r+�sidential PzopertY abutting the ch�ch pr�rperty cm the west side
exc�p# wh�re the prop�erh�+ abuts the city pump house.
The �mmissicmers interpos�d no c�bjections to approval of the Applicatian.
ACTI{}N TO RECC�M�I+�END APPRUVAL �F APFLICATIC}N N(). 2tlt}7-�9. BRCXJKLYN
CENTER C C�i t?F THE NAZAREIVE
There was a xnation by Cornmissiaa�er Lund, seaondeti by C;am�us�aianer Youn$, to r�commenc�
to the City Couucil that is agprove Ap�lication No. 2047-�9, submitted by Bmolclya C�t�r
Church of the I+T e, for S�ial Use Fermit and Sit� and Builciin$ P�an appmval fuz a t#�ree
�hase building additia� and parking lot expansion fQr the Cliurch of the Naz�rene Iocat�i at 501
73'� Av�nue Nc3rth sub�e�t ta #he following conditians:
1. Thc: buiiding plans are subject to review aztd �pmvat by the Building Qi�cial
426-07
Page 4
with respect ta applicable c,odes prior to the issuance ofbuildin:g pe�tits.
2. G�ding, drainage, utility and erosion can�l plan ate subject ta review and
approval by the City Engine.er prior to the issuance c�f permits.
3 A$i� p�OlAl8ilC6 8�T8CQiCIIi 8IId St1�1j3Qrt1II� flAaIlC18I �l�t�.�� 121 �1 �Alt}lttlt tt7
be determined bas�i on cast ��tinlates shall be sub�nitt� prior EQ the issu�nce of
building pefi�mits.
4. Any oucside trash d7ispa�a�a1 facilid� and roof tc�p or on graund rnechanical
�uipment shall be priately scre�ned frc�m 'view.
5. B�i12 curb and gutter shall be provided around �.11 parlwng and driving areas.
6. .�Aan as built survey c�f the pmperty, impmvements an+d utility service lines shall be
submitted t+� the City Engineering Department.
7. All wcrrk p�'armed sud materials v�ed for constiuct�on Qf utili�ies sha�il cunform
to the City af Brooklyn Center's current steu�dard,s speci?fications and details,
8. The a�plicant sha11 provide agpropriate erosian and sediime�zt control devic� an
site durin� c�nstruction as approved by the� ��ty Engineering I�arbment and
shali obtain a�n NPD�S construction �ite erosim� c+�ntrvl p�mit from thc
Minn�esota Pollution Contml Agency prior tc� disturbia�tg the site.
3. A special us� �enmit is gcanted to tho Broaklyn Genter Church of the Naz�re�e to
expae� the church in the proposed tt�ree phase devel�pment and to provide far a
�+Ie� Transit Pazk and Ride facility �s comprch�ade�i by t.h� plans, An�
expansio� or alt.era�aion of this site, not camprehendexl by the zonin� ordinance or
by these appmved pla�s shall not be authoriz�i a�►d would be subj�ct to an
amendme�t to the special e�se permit.
1U. 'Tt�e sp��l use permit is subject to all �pplicabl� �c�e�, ordin�z�s and
regvlations. �,ny violatic�ns thereof cauld be gmunds fc►r revocatic�n.
I 11, 'I'he plans shall be madi5ed #o provide a b ft, hiK� �P�l�� f�c� alrn�g the �est
praperty line to screen all Rl zoned pmperty elcc�t for the City's well hc�use
P��Y�
Voting �n favar. Chair Fra Tem Roche, Commissione�rs, Boe.�k, Ford, Lund, and �''oung.
The n�otion p►assed unanimously.
"I'h� Cowa�il will co�ide.r th� appli+�ation at its May 14, 2007 m+��. The �aplicant must be
�re,sent� 'ar c�n es to t�►e Iic.ation as review+�i b the P1a�nu� Commissicm will �aire
P 8 �PP Y S �4
I thai �e applicacatiic�n 1� r�tum+�d to tlze Commission for rec�nsid 'c�n
4-Zb-0"7
Fag� 5
i
'I`h� W85 i!b O�i�i bU3i31�5S.
T he�e wss a motion by Ct�rmrnissic�ner &�eck, s�onded b�r C4m�ussia�ner Yaung, ta adjourn the
Planiung �onunission meeting. The rnatian passed unanimo�tsly, 'The m�ng adjo�rned at
9.18 p.m,
Chaiar
lZecorded and transcn'beci by:
Rebecca C'rass
I
4-2b-07
Pag� 6
f P k
I
U
5 m
g.
H
.1
i
J
S':
:.:t v
i
.,.y
c
f
x..'
i:
x
E
r..� L
A
ye
L
2
N
i.
'i..
Y
t
.i
b
f
r
s..
5
f �4
�v
x
E,.:
r
.E,;;
x:
a:
,.E
V
i
L
S
z
a-.
J
r. y
wI
.i
..:.s
:y.
t'
x::
,F 3
.2
F
i::. ti
l
y
v
w
`c��
i'
r� •.x.�,: .y7
i.��i
v
f
f
q
..i..
E
f
i�
,ro- i
w''::
:t;
4 3
a
n�
e
y::.
..i:: y
.i t
Y
i 1;
"J' c..
b
v
..0 .n.
'.i::
G
j
3
�'�5
8
i
r.
�.s.; t 4
i+.
.X �Y�i
:�.i
r.: .rz
:T
.i..
..:y
v
r
i
r:
.r. s F
j''. y�
f
�g
i
m X
w
..x�
x r:.
y
..r
:i
5
S
I +C4UNCIL IT��:M MEMt�RAI�iI?i3N#
TU: Curk Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Ronald A. Warren, Planning and Zoning ialist C✓t
DATE: May 7, 2Q07
SUBJECT: Plannin� Gouunission Application No. 2UC)7-009
R�comme�ds#Ian:
It is re�o�nme�de�i that the City Couacil, following cansideratian of this matter,
approve the appliGatic�n subject to the canditions re�omm�ded hy the Flan�ung
Comut�issior�.
B�ckgragnd:
{)n the Niay 14, 2007 Cir� Cc>wncil Agen�a is Pia�ing Gommission Appli�aaon No.
20�'7-U(?9 submitt�l by �3ra�klyn �Centtr Church of the Nazarene requesting a Sp�cial
tJse Fermii and Site at�d Building Plan Apgroval for a thre� phase church actdition and
�TI(tII� lU#. �X�;�flS10II �L SO� AYCIIUC NOtCb This r was considered by the
P '�g Cciimmissir�n at their April 26, 2Q07 meetin� and was r+e�c�mmended fc�r
appr�val.
Attac:��i far your review are c,opi� of the Planni�ng Gomaaission information Sh�et for
Pl g C sian Agplication Nu. 200'7-009 a�d also aa� atec� map showin� ihe
ar
l+r�tion of the pra�rty ur�der consideradon, various site and bui�ding plans for the
pr developm�nt, the P1aAning Conamission minutes relatin;� w tt�+� Commissivn's
cons;deratiun �tf this matt��r an�d other supporting dc�cuments.
1'h�e applic�nt, Revere�t Dean Potts, wauld like the Gity Council to r�usider t.�te
P 'ng �Camynissina's re�umm;endation that there be a 6 ft, high woad al��n�
the Church's west property �iz►e to p�rovidc scr of the 1Qt trom the R-�
zo�d prt��.�rty to the west. Th�y �ad originally prc�posed 1 pe s�r�enisg
c+ansisiin� of Norway Spnu� a�d Te�h�ey Arborvitae as scr g a�oa� the west
pr liu�e, �e believ� �his wauld be apprapriate and mc�ets the ordin�ance
r�u' t, which c�lls for "a solid opaque fen ce or wall b ft. hi�h oar such vther
devic+e as may be approv�d by the Ciry Cauncil".
Btt�dget Is�ue.�» There �re no bud�et jssnes.
Appl�catiQn Fileci on 4112l07
City Cot�ncil Actic�n Should Be
'�ak�n By �l11lU�' (6f} l�aYs}
Planning Cammission Infama�ation �heet
Application Nc�. 200?-�9
Applicant: Brooklyn Center Church of th� Nazarene
�a►tion: 5�►1 73rd Aven�e Narth
R�uest: Sp�cial Use Perami�tlSite and Builc�g Plan Appmval
The app�lli�ant, Pastar De�an Pcrtts c��z b�halfc�f the Braokl�rtx Center Church o€the Nazazene, i�
seekin� a Spocial tTse Peimit and Site and Building Ptan aPProval for a three phase buildin$
aclditian and parking Iot expansion far the Church of the Nazar�e located at 501 fi3� Avenue
Nortly,
The property i� que�tion is zor��i R-1 {Oae Farnily Residence) �nd is locateti at the sauthwe.st
quadrant of'I`.H. 252 and 73'� Avenue North. It is susmunded on the north by fi3'� Avenue which
is the muni+cipal baundary between Brooklyn Center �d Broaklyn Pazk wit�► single family homes
on the opposite side of the street; on the east by T.H. 252; an the south by R-4 (Multiple
Residence) znned property cc�ntaining the Evergre.en Park apartments; and on tfie west by R-1
zone,�i prope�ty r,+�nt�ing single family homes and a city well bouse. Chur�hes are iisted as
spe�ial uses in the R-1 zoning district,
I'Rt�PQSAL
'i'he apPlican# proposes io da tbe abvve mentioned additions and �►lteration� in thr+� phases.
(S� the written narrative provici�i by Pastor Potts, attached.) Phase I includes a substaniial
expans�on tc� the e,ast, west and sc�uth side.s c�f the existing parking lot. The parking lot would
still be tc� the back side of #he church and would be �pand� to witlun 5 ft. Qf the sauth propertY
line,l5 ft, of th+� v►►est P�"P�Y line, and 15 ft. of the T.H. 252 right of way, w�iich are ali the
min%mwn re�uirexl pmperty lu�e se#backs in these cases. 'Tl�ey al�o plan to alter current drop
off ar�a on the �ast side of the church by removing the exi�ting canopy and drop� t�f�' area while
makin:g a relatively s�a11 �d�ditivn (1,U47 sq. ft.) to the sc�utheast ccrm�r of th� building to
�commodat+e an expand+ed sanctuary and a new foyer. Also to �+e add� at this time wauld be a
ne�v canc�py �avex a revised drop s�ff aze�a and an unfiniahed secc�nd fl�r addition. The Phase I
plan w�ill pmvid� a�ew dry pond �rea at the northwest corrier af the site tc� acc4mmcxiate and
cc�►ntrol water rur� off from the eupa�ded parking lot at�d pmgosed three phase l�uilding
expaz�iflns.
F'has� II wot�ld ian�c�l�ve an L- additian at the sout1�east corrne�r of the �hur�h along w�ith
p� g lot alteration�, �idewalk e�ansicros and finis�hing of spa�ces in th� second story adciition.
T'wer�t�y five new parlcin� sp� v�c�uld be providal on the w+�st sid� +of th� buiiding alan,g both
sides of the acc�ss drive frc�an 73`� Avenue North. A recc>nfi$ured d�rive uplci�rop off ar�a wc�uld
atsfl be a�ccomplished under this phase.
4-2b-�J7
���1
I
Fhase IlI wauld include a courtyard and fayer additioa a# tl�c n�rtheast a�i suuthwest carners of
the builc�ing respe�tiv�ly and expansion of the sanctua�y.
ACCESS/PARI�1NCx
Access tc� the site is unchan�e�l and is provided by a single curb bre�lc aff'73'� Av�nue North,
west of the existirig lc�ation of the church buitd.ing. The p g recl�irement for a�hur+ch is
bas�cl on its seatiun� cagacity. The ftnal e7cpansion of the chur�h w�uld h�ve a seating ca�a+city of
35U seats, ��quiring tatat of l 1'7 parldng spaces. Interim ex.pansion has a ma�cimum seating
capacity of 3fl� seats, re�quiring 104 parking spaces. T'he Phase parki�xg expansian and
re�onfig�ration wili accamrnodate 120 cars. f?ne hundr�d tt�irty four spac�s will be provid�d in
the final phas�, which exc�s the minirnum required €ar this facility.
G�ING/DRAINAGElUTILITIES
fih� applic.ant has provid�d a grading, drainage, utility a�d erosion cvntrol plan which is being
reviewed by #he City Engin+ecr. His written comments will be attae3�ed for the Cc�mmission's
review.
A pa�ding airea sazed to acco�date the fu11 expansion of the ehurch wilt be canstrueted durin,g
the Phase I expar�sipn, Storm sewer will be pmvided to cagture t�rainage to be evnveyed to t�e
pondin� area azid then dischazgeti inta th� public starm sewex system. B-612 curb and gt�t�er is
r�uire,d around a�l parking and driving areas.
The chw�c� serv+es as an in#'+�rma1 Me#ro Transit Park and Ride facility during ot�peak church
hours. The expanded pazkin� fa�%lity wiU accommodat+� additianal Park a�d Ride �ers and the
site wi�l be conu�t�i in tbe futur+� to ihe bus shelter adjacent to T.H. 252 by the sidewalk.
Ap�rroval of this �►plication should acknowledge the Park �nnd Ride arrangement betwe�n the
church and Metro 'Transit bas�ed on an offpeak use a€the prop�rty.
L,Al�1:DSCAP�J+GlSGRE�NiNC�
The applicant has paro tw+� pmvide some landsca�ing on the s�te i�a c4nju�cti�n wi#h his
req site and building pla� submittal. 'There are a f�w de+ci�iuc�u� tre� an�l shnibs on the site,
s�me of wl�cb will �av+� t� be r�rnoved fc�r construction. The appli�a�nt has prov�d�d with
th� la�dscape point syst�n �d by t�e Planning Commis�si�n for ev�luat�� laza plans. It
sh4uid be nQted that the lan�� point system does nc�t addr�ss church faciliti+� or school�, so
vve really bave nsa eval��ation �iteria We have suggest�d the servic�l4t�ce categ�ry as a
g�idel�aa� ft�r �valuating this lands�ape plan. Screening is alsc� s�quired wh� p' g 1�rts af six
c�r xnt�r� v��i�les abut r�s�den#ialty zonecl praperty. A 15 st�ip is r�quir� where t2us
property abu�.s R 1 an�d is pmvici�. No buff'er distance is rez�uire�i w�ere t�� churcb� praperty
abut,s with the apartment complex to the south, 'The parking lot screening star�dard require�s
e##��active screenir►g from abuttimg re�identialloLs by a solid agaque f�ce or wall 6#t. high or
su��a +�ther device as ma�► be appmv+�cl by the City Co�ncil, The City Cvuncil l�as a�rmvecl
Pa e 2
8
i
landscape scre�nin.g in ttze past that �►ill me,et the 6 ft. apaque stanc�arci,
Th� site zn ques�ion is �.2$ acres w�ich, if it were a seivice%ffic� use wc�uld rwquire 220
lat�dsca�se pc�ints. Their pl�n indicates two new Hackbezry tr�, to be placed aiang tbe northwes�
�een strip: four nevv Norway Sp�ce west of the retention gand; nine nevv shrubs pl�nted b ft.
a�part, we,st c�f the new parkin� lc�t; ten new shrubs pl�nted 6 ft. �park i� the twc� island delineation
ar� in the parking Ic�t, and 23 siuubs atong the south property 1'ute east of an eatistin� b ift. high
wood fence. The�re �ppears ta be three e�cisting deciduaus tr�es o� the site that will be saved.
'This to be a total poi�t value af 8S points, given the ]andscaPe I�int syst�.
The Cc�mmissian mus# determin� two things: 1. Is tl�is su#�icien� landscaping to meet the
r�uir+�naent af a lanclscape p�an? And 2, Is the scrr�nin� suffici�nt to re�ammend th� �rcrecning
plz�n t+� the City Council as bein� ade�e�ate to meet th� standazds of the s�rdinanr.c? S�re�ening is
r+�qu�reci alo�� th� w�t side and south side of the nevvly e�rp�nc�ed parking 14t. It should be
pt�inted +aut that there is an e�cisting b R. high waod�n fence that meattders along the pmperty line
between the Church crfthe �taza�r9ene and the apartrnent camplex to the south. The apaztment
cornpiex also had scr�ning requiz�ements where it abuts with the R 1 zoned chut9ch pro'Perty'. It
is believed that this f+enc+e is fvr s�cx�nin8 Purposes beiween th� twv uscs, hc�wever, it d+�es �nvt
scre.en the entire width vf the lat nvr would it provide screen�ng far the expanded parki�g area.
Again, the applicant propos�s to fill this area in with shrubs plantetl G ft, apart to me�t their
screenin� obl�gatiQn. Alo�g tlze west pmperty line are three existing single family homes and a
city weil house which has the appearance of a single fami�y hame. Again, scn�nuig is re�quired
along this area because af the abutting parking lot� We have advise�d the applicant that we do not
believe it is m�ndatory to sc�;en the parking lot from the city's weil hause, howev�r, the balance
of th+� residentia� property sh�uld be provided with screeniug that is consider� appmpriate far
this area.
�VILDING
I The applicant has pm�rided building elevatians showing the e�st and north building elevations for
the church in its fwal sta�e. 'Tt�ey gtan to have five inch vi.nyl siding with an a2uminw�n covereci
trim �oard am�,nd the perimeter of the building and a�hin�l�vd re�f. Flac�� ptans and buildix►g
sec#ions hav� alsa be�n �rovidecl showing the expanded sanctuary area, foyer, class�ms,
offices, restr�ams and kitch�n fc�r the revised f�ci�ity.
LIGHTIl�iGPTRASH
The appli+cant �as s 'tted a I�ghting plan showing f+aat candles at various 1ac,atians
surrounding t�►e �t�. Tt� plan shows seven li�t stanciards s�rrouadit�g the ne�v g faci�ity
on the south side of the church and one li�ht standard at the +�ntranc�. The �i,ghi�n$ plan shows
f�t candl� tc> b+e witk� L�e range c�f authorize�d lighting in res�d�ntial arr�s.
Section 35-'T12 of the City Ardinances r�uires that all ext+�aor lighting sh�il t� provided wit�
�I lenses, rc#lect�s or shad�;s scr as ta concentrate illuminatio� on the proPert�' ofthe +�vvne� or
P��� 3
operatc�r af the illumina�tion devices, Rays of light shall nat pass t�yan�d the property lines of #�e
premis�s at an �ntensify gr� thaxi 3 ft. candles me.ast�i at pcopertrty line� ahutting residentially
zon�i PmpertY. No glare shall e�manf�te from or be visible bsyand the boundauries oftl��
illuminated premise�. The appl�cant pmvides a note Qn #�ie plan indicatin� tha� fixtures are
"forward throw with shazp cut off �i�hts at required loc�tions such that lighting levels will be
zero at lot 1in�s",
"I"!ie �lan indi�ates nc� outside trash facilities. It is assumed that any trash vvill be cont�uned
vvithin th� buildir�,�. If this is nc�t the c.ase, the applicant shc3u�d prvvide a lucation for trash and
an a�Pnc�ariate screening device cc�mpatible with the buitr�ing t€� scre� the trast�► contain�s frarn
public vie�vv.
SPECIAL LISE PE'R11r�T STA.NDARDS
As �ndicat�l previo�sly, th� chunch is a special use in th� R-1 zoning district and is subje.ct to the
standards for special use peimits cc�ntained in Sectian 3S-22Q af the City Ordin�uces (copy
attach�l)� These st,andards far special u�e permits requure tha# th� prop4s� special use will
promc�te and enhance the general public welfare and not be d+e�imental to or endanger the health
and safety of the public; not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of Qt�e�r p�gerty in �he
imme�lia#e neiglzborhood, nor substan#ially diminish or impair property value.s; aot imp�e ttie
normai ar�d orderly de��lopment of sumounding pm�erty; be designed so as t4 minimi�e t�raffic
r.angesrion on the public str��ts; and conform with the applicable regulations af the disttrict in
which it is 1
W� wouid co�ent'�th�t the expansi�n of the Brooklyn Center Chcuch of the Nazatene would
nr�t 1� detrimental to +�r endanger the public health, saf�ty, morals or comfort, Furth�nore, it is
believ�i th�t t�is �xpansion will nnt be injurious to other property in #h� imrn�ii�►te vicuuty nor
wiil i# ``n�� i�pair property vatu� within thc neighbc�z�iood, Ad�uate meast�res h�ve
been taken tci p�c�vide pr��rty i�gress and e$ress and the parkin� on the site is ad�ua�te for the
uses pmvided a�ad ihe us+� �f the Parkin8 Iot facility at o#�'p�atc ti�� �irom tJ�e ct�ur�� use as a
Farl� �nd Ride facilit�+ is apprQgriate and should be en�uurra��. We �so do n4t see t�c
cc�n�estion on public str�ts to be care�ated wi#h this exgansi�n.
There are m�kers th�t n+� to be wo�ketl out with respect tc� the adequacy c�f tt�� proposed
land�c�ing a�d scr Plan. These do not r,cecn to be insunnountable and once s�atisfi�, it
cata be deterrr�ined thai the pro�sal m+�s the standards fc�r s��al use percnits ccantaaned in the
Cit}+'s Zoning fJrdinance and can b� recommended for apparoval.
.A public h' g has scheduled �vith respect to this sp�ci�l �use �rermit �nd no�ices have l�en
s�t to surmunciir�g prop�rty o
RE�4I�MEI�AT'I{)�1
Approval of this app�icatic�n is recornmended subject to the fcrltowin� conditions and
consideratic�ns:
1. The b�itding plans are subjeci to review and appmval by th� B�ilding 4fficial
w�ith t tc� applicable codes prior to the issuance of buildin� permits.
2. G�a�ding, drainag�, utility and erosion co�txni plan are subject to revi�erw aruud
a�rpraval by the City Engineer prior ta the issuau�ce af �ts.
3. A site performanc� agcecme�t and supporting f�ancial guarantee in an aanc>unt to
be determinai bas�l on cost estimates shali submitted prior t� the issuance �f
huilding p�rmits.
4. An�r outsid� trash dispasal faucilitie.s and aroof tQp or on grout�d me�hanical
equiprn+�t shall t�e appropriately screened frvrn view.
5. B512 eurb ancl gutter shall be providcci arau�nd all parking and driuing areas.
6. An as buiit survey of the praperty, improvements a�d utility service lines shall be
submitted to the City Engineering Department.
I 3. All wc�rk pe�foarmed and materials useti for cc��structio�n of utilities shall cor�form
to the Gity r�f B�kl}m Cen#er's cunent standards i5catic��s aAd details.
8. The applicant shatl provide appropriate emsion and sedim�t cnntroi devic�s an
site durin� canstnietion as approved by the City Engin+eening D�epari�me�nt and
s�all obtain an NPDES construction site erosion control �aet�nit from the
14:�innesc�ta Pc�ilutic�n +Control Agency pnoz tQ disturbin� the site.
9. A s�cial use 't i� granted to the Br+o�klyn Cent�r �urch of the Nazarene to
expand th� chuz�h in the pro�sed three ph�se develc�pm�t and tQ provide for a
Metro Transit Pazk aand Ride facility as coxr�pn��tended by these plaur�s. Any
�xpansian c�r altera#iun of this site, not campreh�nd�i by the zatii�g ordian�nce or
�y t��e ap�roved �1ans shall not be autharized and wanld be subject to an
amendmen# tc� the sp+�ial use permit.
U. s�cial use p�rmit is subject ta a�l app�cable +c�des, c�r�r►ances �nd
regeilations. Any violations thereof coul� be grounds for revocation.
l 1. The p�s shall be mo�ified in such a manner tc� bring the �an in� and
��ng pi�ns into campliance with city requirem+e�tts or the 1an�ape pla�s and
scre�ani��� plants sre recc>mmended to be in cvmplia�ace wi�h the provisions of the
zoning or ce far these two matters.
Page 5
f
��tl�i
�j� ��1
T r..,
r rr
���������e �1�1�� ■11 r� r
1� �11�1� ���r�� 7�����,.111
■i� .ro...,M�'f�
111�
w
r������
�'1� �i,�r
f��:�i�:Y�7
i�i i� ����/1�
I/�1� ���T�+:� C 1���1/1�/�
���r� ����r ,��W����
■�r�� ����I
111111`�r�r� �11� �1
�C�� 1111�11�1�1�1� �+���i�►�
v;
��I�����r� /11�//// /����1
r�
i�■� /1��/�/1�111� r//11/II�
r�� ■/�/I/llr
r r
%�IE�ti��1��1� f�11i�7r�Wr��llr, 11
"1'�" T
:r������: �rr�rr�r�r�/�,: ����i���
1111111
LC?GISMa� Qutput Pa�e Page 1 of 1
I
r». �.c��,mo�a�as
http.ilgas.l+�gi�.org/�.,(XiIS_ArcIlvlSluns?SexviceNam�bc L4GISM�,�C3�I&Clie�rtl�ersip... 4f3912�7
�'ity c�f Br�c�vklyn �'enter
A Mi�lennium Comtnunity
��MaRAr�nv�
DATE: Apri124, 20�7
T�: Ron Wazre�►, Planrung and Zoning Sp�ecialist
FRUMz Tc�dd Blomstroxn, I}ire�tor of Public Works ''r�
SUBJECT; Preliminary Site Plan Review
Pla�nning �ommission Applicatians 20p7-40'�
Gi�urch af 2�tazarene
Public Works pepartmeni staff reviewed the following prelimin�ry dacuments submitted for
review under P�anning GommissiQn Application 2007-009 for the propos�d building and parking
lc�t expansion at the Church of Nazarene,
Sheei C1, ALTA/A,GSM Survey, dated March 29, 200�
Sh�:et G2: Removal arid Dimension Plan, Not d�ted
Sheet C3: Grading, Drainage and Erosion Cantrol Plan, Nflt dat+ed
The applicant is propc�sing to deveIc�p property consisting of Lot 1, Block 1,1*1aza�'ene Addition Plat
2. fihis site is located at SOl 73'� Ave�ue North.
Public Wc�rks staffrecoxnrnec��is that #he foilowing conditi4ns ofapprcaval be adapted by the Planning
Commissit�n and Gity Gouncil for Plan�ing Commission Application 2Q4?-OU9.
1. SITE LAY�317T
The Rernovai and I�3imension Plan pravides layouts for a pragosed twr� phase expansion of the
�uilding and parking lat. A majority of the parking lot expansic�n is proposed with the frrst phase.
The applrcant is pr+aposi�ag to maintain the existing site access anto 73� Av�nu+� �torth, A median
c�pening and sbort l�ft turn la�n+� alting 73` Avenue is provifleci for th�e existing sit� acc�ss, A
maj�rity of the traffii+e generated with the proposed building and pa�lcing Iat expansion is projected to
follow a travel route fi�om Highway 252 to 73`� ,Avenue.
A. ParkYng lot spaces and drive lane dirnensi�ns shall comply with the minimum desi�,n
siand�rds rovided in City Ordinance Se�tion 35-702.
P
I 83tI1 Shingle aCr°�k Parktvu,Y Recreatior� und Ga�mrraunity C`enter Fhone 7't?17 ,�Vurraher
;8rooklyn Center, M.N 55430-�19� (?63) 569-3�Q0
City Hccll T�17 Numt�er (783) 5�i9-33Q� FAX (763? 56'9-34�4' Pagr 1 of3
F'AX (�63) 56,�-3494
ua�w.�ityofbr�kl�ncent�r.ar�
B. 1'he a licant shal� constru tic� rb 1on erimeter af a1l
PP n concrete cu and gutter a g th� p
driveways, parking lots, pa�king spaces and �av�d drivin� surfaces that are canstrticted
during each �hase of ex�ransit�n. Curb and gutter sha11 be constructed in accordance with the
dimensions �f'Type B-b 18 ar �-612 as per Gity design standards.
G. Parking and drive�ay areas shall be paved with bitumin�us ar conereEe pavement prior ttr
treing ptaced into use for parkir►g of vehicles.
D. The applicant shall abtain all necessary right-of-way perrnits from the Minnesc�ta I}epartment
of Tz�rtsportation for the praposed sidewalk extension into ttte MnIDC►T right-of-way.
2. FUBI.II� UTII.I'TY SERVI+CES
The existing water service tv t�e building is supplied from G-inch diameter water maain along 73"�
Avenue North. The existin�g sanitary sewer service to the building is supplied frc�m an 8-ir�ch
di�.meter sa�iiiary s�ww�r m�in alon,� Gamden Avenue, °The sewer service for the church buildin�
currently extends through private property located at 7242 Camden Avenue.
A. The applicant shall provide the Gity with a copy af the easement for the sanitary sewer
e�tending through 7242 �a�mt�en Avenue. If a► utility e�sea�ent does not existing for the
porti�� c�f fhe sanitary sewer s�rvice extending tlu�augh 7242 Camden Avenue, xhe applicant
shall acquire an easetne�t for this service pricsr to issuance of a bualding permit for this
p�jeci or relocate the sanitary sewer service though the �hurch ovrrned pr�perty locat.+� at
7236 Gamtlen Av�nue,
B. The applicant shall verify that the existin� wat�r and sewer services will prt�vide su#�cient
capacily to serve the proposed building expansion.
C. The applicant is p�ro�sing to construct a stamn wa�er deten�ion basin ov�r the top of the
exisring sanitary sewer service for the church building,. The grading plan shall be amended tc�
main#ain a miz�imum af2 feet ofground cover ov�r the sanitaiy sevir�r s�rvice. The site plaGns
�hall be �mer�ded to spe�ify that the sanitary sewer service shall be thorQUghly insulated
alt�ng all pipe segments with less ihan six feet of ground cover.
I3. 'The Applicant shall be responsible for coordinating site dev�lopment ��ans with Xcei
Energy, Center�oi»t Energy, Qwesi Communications and otla�r priv�te utility compani�es.
4. GRAI?It�t�, DRA.IN�+GE AN� ERQSIUN CONfiROL
The appli�ar�t is prc.�pusing a cornbinatian of storm drainage pipes and construct�nn +�f a storm watt�r
de#�n#ic�n �and ta� managc snrface water runofl for the site, The Pruposed sta�rn� water por�d is
located within ihe City's Drinking Water Supply Marta��e�nent Area, The proposed pon+d is �Isa
Ic�ccated wiihin 2flfl feet City Municipal Water Supply VVell Na 6.
City �#affh�s �n+�tified the applican#'s engineer that a wet {�peenr►anen# Pool) #ype pund would not be an
a�pr�priate �pplication ft�r this site due to patential cc�nt�ami�aatisan t�f the �roundwater aquifer
imr�$tliately adjacen� to Wel1 No. The applicant has also notified staff t�at future site uses rrlay
#'age 2 of 3
include au�sid� activities wi�h yc�un� children. Staff is therefare r�ommendi�zg that the pond be
d�signed ta prevent 14ng-t�rm standin� water and higher rates of infiltra�ic�x�>
A. Grading limits sha11 re�nain within the property briundary unless farmal amang�ments havc
been made with adjacent properiy owners.
B. The Gra+ding Plan shall be amended to show an emergency overflovv route ft�r the stc�rmwater
pond to an adjacent pubiic street ar the ditch alan� Highway 25�. The emer�ensy overf�aw
path shall be a minirnum af two feet below the fi�tished #loor elevation of all adjac�nt
buildings.
C. T`he a�plicant shall obtaim a permi# from the City of Brooklyn Park �or cannection inCc� the
sturrn sewer sys#em along the ncrrth side of 73'� Avenue prit►r to issuance of a building
perrnit.
D. The site plans shall be madified to include an outlet contmi strueture alon�g the side sloge of
the pond thaL will provide dir�ct drainage of the pc�nd to the bottorn grc�und elevatibn. The
grading plan staa3] be amend�d to include drain tile under the fuil length of the pond to
inlercept infittration and diseharge to the down strea�m storm sew�r.
E. Th� applicant shall me�t 4vith Pubtic Works staff to consider alternative pand outl+et desi�s,
which m,ay allow cQnnectian to the storm sewer atan� the sauth side c�f 73`� Avenue based on
ihe requirements of Item D alk�ve. This maiificat�an may elirninate the need for c�pen trench
con�tructian across 73`� Avenue and abtaining a perniit �rom the Gi#y ofBrovklyn Park.
F. firi+� site grading plan shall be amended to provide maacimum side slopes along tt�e pond of
3:1 (I�:iT).
G. T'he property owner af il�e proposecl develapment shall enter into an Agreemenr for
11�taintenance a�d lnspec#ivn of Utility and S1vrm DrQinage S�stems with ihe City af
Broo�lyn C��ter #v insur� the continued maintenance vf on-sit� uti}ities and storm water
facilii�+es.
H, The applicant shall provide a Storm Water Pc�llurion Ptevention F'lan wit� the documents
�t�brnitted for the buiiding permit application,
The ai,�ve cc�m�ner�ts are �rc�vaded basecl on the information submi#ted by the a�pplicant a# the time vf
this review. Subs�quent approval c�f the finai piat and site ptans may require additiunal rnodificacions
based c�n +cngineering requirements assc�iated with finai tl�sign of the wat�r supply, sto�n drainage,
sanitary sewer, final grading and geometric design as establishecl by the City En�;ineer and other
public ��cials having jurisdi�tion over approval of the fin�l site plans.
Psge 3 vf 3
Bra+uktyn Ce�ter Cl�urcb of the N�reae Baildin� Plan.
2�7 Phase 1.
The p�rk�ag iflt vv�U bae ��cpaaded from its curreni capacity gf 33 cazs to a total c�f 120
stalls. Clf this total, 8 staUs will be gained on the east side of�hk� b�ildiug due tc� #he
r�na�oval ofthe east side entrance c,an+apy. Ttus azea wi11 nc� long�r be desi as a fire
lane.
A drive thru Iane will be constructed along the �uth sido c�f the ct�nrent curb and a
portimn of tlae new additio�► wiil caver this lane for a cover�i drop-off area.
Five handicappeti parkin� sfQts will be designated (currentl�+ there ar�e nane).
A dry pond w�ll be c�►nstructed ta the wost which will hold the pe�k flow fiaom a 100
year storm of 24 �ur duration. The battom of the pond will �a.ve water toierant aad
flowers and will draua� by a series �af drain ril� lc�ated �aoat 1 ft bclow the s�rf`�.
fihese tii� will drai� �nt.� a header systecn that dr�uns inta the ston� sew�r sys�n at a
slc�w, contrt�ll�1 raie. Th� �nci is sizod to h�anale the runoff from phase 1 hard surface
areas �d all thc aciditional area� shown in the finai phase.
T6e build�ag ehan�es dnring the flrst ph�ue w�Ui be as f+�tMws �o pr�iiority ord�r.
Add a s�nd unfii�uish�ct floor over the flat roofed fell�wskzip a�d c om area and put
a pitcheci mof over the tap of ii, This is to addre�s the currcmt coof ieaking prohlems and
at the sa�ne time �mvide a�ssibility for future ex��aasion. As part of'this p the
curre�i fla# ro�f will havc a beam ar�d supports adde�i so that the roc�f will ha��clte fiiteir�
floor loa�is with better tti�uu re,quirai defle�tion allawances.
Thc sanct�ar�+ ruof wif� als+� be cover�i over by a�traight pitchecl mof to ma�ciz thc rest
u�th� building, Th� �rea above the cwrretit raof�l belc�w thc ncw roafwill pmvide
space fox bat iasula�ion and, in ihe future, air conditi�ning aand g ductwork.
To the s�ut� of t�e e7cis�i�g sancta�ary a new foye.r will be at�d�i using S6 ft lon�
n�in$ �rth and sou#�t. Th� ridge line will run ea�t-wc�t ancl %s ofthc area under the
will be encl�se�i to fcum a new foyer and �ntran�ee into t]ae n�w �an�tu�ry. '�he
ar�a that is not cc�los� will form a covered drap-aff atca.
Thc changes inside th� �xisting c m and sanctuary ar+�s will includ.e;
a) creatiou ofa handica�tp� ible toilet facility from an existuag t�rn thai was once
the main t�ilet facility for the building iu I 968. No ma��r plumbing eh��� a�r+ee r�ui�
but th� doar entrance wc�uld �ed to be widened.
d�vidin� an existing roc>� into two roams, onc for tab�� and cha�irr �ra�,re, c�ne for
class�room s�+ace.
c) dividing an exiting r�aom intcr a haliway aad office and mu�viag an e�isi�g doorway on
the san�tuary wali to align wiih thc hallway.
d) renaovin,g si�ie rooms from the sanctuary platform �rtd widening it, 'Ttus wi�t pmvide
room to put the piano and +�rgan on the plaiform iur�steati of an the s�anctu�y fl�r level.
removin� the c�i�ding watl betwee� saractuary az�d foyer and ex g#khe sanci:uary'
space.
ch�nging the main entra�nc+e lt�+cation from the east side tc� the south side �f the
bui�ding.
f} changing an sxisting c�ffic+� space into a corridvr &om the new foyer area to the
ci�ss�raam ar��i fctic�wship hall area af the building.
F'�t�nre Exp�nsioo Fla�aa�s, P��e 2.
Bwtid�n� �h��;�s
Ar� additic�n t� the 39 x Sb ft fr�yer area will be macie cnnverking ii to 56 x 8Q sanetuary
a�ui foyer area. �ea#in,� c,�a�city is cxpected ta he a�rut 25U. The +current sanctua�y will
be ccmverted ta a multi-purpOSe area and new classm+ams, t+�ilet facilities annd offic� wi11
be con�pleted in the upp�err fIoor above the cun�ent fcllowship/ed�tcational room,
As nesult of tbe new sanctuary +e�cpansian, the parkin►g �at c�n the �ast side ofthc buitding
will bc cut off and the northe�.st portion wiil be tume�i t�ack to gra�s.
Park�n� Lo# cLant+�.
Two new rows af parla.ng {2S �paces) will be adde� along�ide the entranicc c�rivew�y.
The existing asp�i on tbe calde,st part of the lot will be removed and tbe Iot will be
xegra�ded at�d paved. A1ew sidewallcs and curbs f�r a ncw curving dnve past th� south
sid� of the building will be install�d. 3idewalks alc�ng�ide the new sau�ctuary and to the
bus stop �ill bc completed,
i�#are Expansiou Ptans, �ase 3.
Bu��� c��nge�:
Th� f�nal stagc will oniy a�`ect the building. The fpyt�c in the saz�cuary will be r�noved
�d a n+�w foycr built tu the �outh af the aiucational wi��. 'Thi� wi11 allow the ss�ing
capacity t�a be incr+� to �50, T'his is dcem�d to be tha pr��i� m�ucimurn for tlus
acreag�,
In �d+ditiaan, a n�vv axad patio area will be it�sta,��d in thc n�rtheast c�arner of #he
pna�rt� v�'hich will be a p�rt of the finaGl beautification �ffort.
p
S
.ti
s� �i
8 15�
k .t �i t i
l ����'�l,��
�tII�
1 1� �tt�t
1�1111�� 111� 1 i
l
a
y rc .�h.�
1�
4 j 4 'ri�r�3' lr-,
g t y'
t k �#P 6 f A T
p4� p y i� Y
3"i
I ��a���-�
I g :..t
I
1
�k� 'w"'�
'a� k'`�����Z
y «s
f `�z's
I
:e
w�
�'Ay p #s� x w
,44 s
j
M
's� °y, 7.
r
I
i i
i f —TM x
s a�t� w�� ��i �i
1 --r s
�f
i Q
1S� f?lt��f
x
R y
aw�n� �n .w
�A
Y
ma-�-
PHASE 1 FINAL PHASE
LiOPF�R STATE ONE G AII
G�.w �v�a 6S�-/�a-0007
Ir ea w �-IOU-2�.-tiN
a
p i
i
..A_ �aiu h�,t i
v �X �F:r,:�clYN PARR AVtr-i��
:'Yq�
'vfi �-t�r7rY�
.��..s.....___-
a_.-
=�..1 'L'��._. ,:r
r�az'• Il� �c�w w w
C- .xia.:� s
._.1E4 �ae.6�u�st e., .wg:.. p P��.
C _1 `j scw.[ w riir
I aic sraRr eu�u�irc �x+c st�* atnu�=+
.M,�.,� �s K.:.w ur w a�aw mn w �nw+.�
J4MT .Y •.a: TfO �K LL G1�d �K
t� tf0 lIO�
��*+ou
�o��r
lN L �lad� 4 1M7MO[ AMROI Mt
I
Y M� r�� Y►vCM l��
Iw'rM� wvrwl M T Irn
q /Yt 1�YrM t7-7t
l
f� �IOD ►Y"'. IIfA� -A.17L ffy �G
f� 1 MAVY� �A -07� I GY 11G
I I I I� m.K.�v
,y�,
i x
f- +t 8 2
g �r i i 1 i �1 �m.
i i �,.,a..
a....�
�.R,
i i c: .o.�.
,a. ,M.�
..a
��re
MR P�PO�f f� P�YOmIt lOYQ COU6�YY0
N[�r �DDfl7011 N6� 1DDRION P� 2 Ii07T3
PH�.� 1 NO?63
w�u a rw �rw nru. SID6fA1X3 'wirr� or nru wr� r
r�� s �..tw� vru- r r�re o e nru rw�� a s
ROIOYAL rerr w�w ar ��wo nru. REYOYAL »t.r ri+r� a n+wr n�uaa. �s�
rmu r�r� er r�r�s nuu mur► w� mr �rr� a nww nru ra�rs �s
lLL2 a 4wv7f r 19uOnN 7�ri�+��. Y� �,u .w. mrr. �r� m aw• wN w.lY I� a s� n
nw�e �'U, fn.:lo� E.ri s wi i r• x. ulosm uw 1lw+a ww uw v M s�s'r. JOB wwE M�'N a IN71�t O�M 9'h. Nc PR0.1 N0. mS �-0.1
r. a�,a��r� www r�,, w� aE11510q i1M1 i sm no wi[. wao�
1•: a. u i��. i) r:. w ti�• u v K v ��c �.r� �.w .c ,a waarw wnrs ir �aw Crrttao er: vs sE[t wo. c2 0
I
u a �.....v..va��
PHASE 1 FINAL PHASE
fwn Cnw M�e 6l�-�1f�-0001
W tW !.w �-tW-7l1-�IN
1- J
I j
I e' �f•� i W'Y H `'fq YN PMK �S$-#V�—f.—_ v...._.�
'ITY Ci tfti(KKI�N wMK "'t7'+"^ty` `��..EhffRZ�
.�.i�"I" �F2Rk��.11x'-?�F�iFC-.r� ,r c+
�ry 7 f
M^J
'I/1�y, .'f c< Bb"t �ST q ,10 ,N
M00 y '_Y OG 4.41
i J V r-- _S �I —y io SGIL M R[�
q
t! I a
bFY ttORY BUtIlAP
I in 6. R11 NM N p�IIMt
0316 STORY B�IWIN6 dMfK R w�tM�4� vM�o��O� ass MR a� frpl wG w
I r� .�.:��.t...
t w� o.wr+vv�.•�rm�s
v e 0 t t 3 i �+o s1o��.�ttt�In�. u� .e ro c.o .vc r
T Il i
.a-.. i I�Y.�
i
p Lst 4�od� L 1MU�C Ar[ILI�7
i I u. 1�Irt prt �w�u hreA 4M �n
r F; 'i I I w.. M
r nn wr.� o-s
o+
.a��' �am ll�
�r-±-. wrw v -w�x s aa� �c.�
wr� -s��r v we �e.+
�mia �u v a c
A f I �,00 �Il �Y
8
T c +t I
a�- fi��fifi� fi
I I I
r 3Saoo Y o�nc o�v�`..a
ti S "_'��iiiiiiii`iiiiilil.l�.�„l��iiiiiiiiiiii�,�,
IR� P�YO�I NR P�YLIQlR IOTflt COURITA9D
NE* ADDfl10N h6� A�OR�CN p�� g p�tq
PH�.� 1 2i0'�3
POND ��r� or rw .urirw n+w w SmLRA1J�3 �wr� w �a. r��iwa �ir.w i�+
�a.a ►�w�vua�. s
fer�a M� a r��a� n�us n�
RPJIOYAL .m.. nu�n w..��r o.w. �w ftm10VAL ront iurr w rursn nraa n
•Of4 �I� P ��0� {lYt� �M
j y� NM1 syf� R�M�l1lrpub_ LLV �OO� 10�� w� 1� MIK� �a wV�i �r K O YCP w!C� J08 MME: O��r71 a N�LMO� M aM1N 8Y: N( PR11J. NQ FDS 6-�3
Nv 1'flrM�)ro i-� wl ��1 Oa� IOi LM fhRfd oi�1 M 40 O 11I1 FK O rOII��
C r.. �vi+�ti:r� �w►a. r�o OY1111a1 �lAN �oc�t�:., ac wem
li v o v c r: �e i��: I 1 r: i�. u� r: �+w w�.t ,u aw woac�w cone�. �r ae+« cNtacm o+': vs sECr No. c2 0
IS�t1ED� i�5�.�
„�.�...,r.
i ��e� t w�a ur w�u�a�o++ �`ra�"a:,r
9 siB t� t�6cK�v r Lrtt+orww wc+�v �c�+a 1 wr+�.
i
q StNa� �0 1 a I
t+ i'� t vu+o ��o f a.s�rs 4m,onw •�c,�n oe�ort�
1�sr cawryps u� �+�g q i
l p�r�r�g n"�aa,.TOn trwme+anta 1 Pc 1�i I s:r o.�+ I 6 e� I ua:33
arta iwaM-�w�
a,r
IldlMt
w
..m.�. a�.-.--. .,,..m.— ..�,e� �R�� 5..�`.� .m.w.�... �9Nai.
,...,�,..,.,...m..,.
C9iY (�F 6�tCK1YKtYN FAkNC '73RA AVB. N, «o�+ �aww+:ar
Ct'r4' Qf �Ittk�KEYT!"T��t1II�M nen�*ex+wa��w
�+WMCr a40.WY4M
..e v,.� �:.W. .m.. ,F ,V. ..AWCS iMN(R 9M 8!
'��`M1- ,.NC_�atiY :._._..d
1 n�.._
a 4 �IM4
x� r f.rffe! M
��f
/i,`�15",
i
i y
�.y..a. ,(ru� sta0ra ryDW; F
E +wnnw *«s wr€+�i _I
i r w .�/r'�'�%
,�,!'f
a s w
✓��irv/ �awi«oArr. g
4 w« u�- nr,nws 4J
�w r v�'�"`." �ai Q
....r� r r r s, a s r,�, w w /t
�i 1� Y 1.� ��V��
r J
.m. .......a. ....4,.,.,..4 N �,�J t.
Y Y Y�.fr A� b y Y.w/
vzsis a. r 4 h r. r 9E
I
1� a s. r ti,i t� v i. F f. w� i s a a�
1 1. M H Y. p u. 4 M♦ M f. U i J 7{����
P�
1 p y. fp 4n.. M M b} R f b` M 1e j
i L�. L .�b R 6 4_. Y 14� 9' M M� 4 hrt tR �7
b 4 M�s M L iw �Y �u 1 M M M b L f. Yr 4 L b 4 kr M L 4 Y
p 4. i` 4 a. M 4 tw M Yr .F ar w 4 M A� w% b ,e
...a�»-.•., r. a y p
1 M
�..�..w�c..,w�«
�,��»w�.�..
.,+Aa++wnoro�ror�.vmw.E..e y�.� iM°�• s•`•:»
MN 1lFK Wlltl! 4MJK (1�►IG�1AR IIOIf illl F MR �M
ar wr�r r
s�w+wr�+wwarnwa wi�r'"�n .ir�'.wt
�,a
Tti1�B 8Td1CY BuWmNG
S'4E�C�ERM ¢NM MFNCJR APAR1MENt. !t-1 :VV t7��
�.1��3 7
r.iaaa
t�
1
SSUED�. t
I-A'1.1� 1-A6.t4 n �,�s.`�'
a..
7 4 fM�Wlt 1ut
f
j �RiIYiVIM+l00M��
...m.nW..+...m N
a'
��a� K�� u r w��i+
I �rer�+wr �r�' W
-o.. a�e .wa►�
E i v w-��
t�
1 1 'E +'r"'"�°�'�r,aa.
1 1 r. ...�.ie.�wa
I i ya+�xr ue�
�M
I 1 +�r wsu
.._..a,..t..L._,_.....�...� �rw�. .0 �����au��,�o wew�unt+
•vwawrw4+�w
.a °�a:.. �v.. .:.��.,.e.., �:.e.'�z:".
�RUttz wa0.t w 1@�
�.av(� ►�r� �r..�v�►�r� �-a�a�
1-A1J� 3-A6.1,r(
w �,,.�:�a...;�...., t�
._..y.. I
M�
k� i r,�►,.�.nM.,
e.. 4 „a
!�a� r
�w u
aaa� �.�w�w ar��+. LD C3���
---gd... a
rpw n. �an
...b 9 4
+wrrt-+ .s�; :�:::=a
�.rwiwwe+n m�iaKpr�aeiae�
ItEBt �L.EY/�filA�i 3s I
r,..«�.
..K.......
�61349�
A4,2
iS5UEl1� ,,,�5',,:...
GKY �a k f.
r�} 1_,A$�.1 1-A�.1 ni�aw. aw '�"5��...».
*�.w.� t m�_v l
«,e.. 1�- �`a�.o�s
1 �a�s�rso
r..
.aa�ra.n.
rwawx
�.0 .....s`.�..,. r.._ ....a�..... osmwe+►�wr
wr�wo`r o�d� w n
9
6 orsNe�
0,� c�. r�� �.swr,
w
..s
r.._ w.�., __a.,, ;;,u:_ e,_. �i iMao�=�
m
r t e�t
i
R
u 1 I
as1: ��ew"
�.�as
I I raw wr..
er4 w area4
i.l,.�.._ ws+�+N
ae,mm e.+eww�.
I .,+e�' ,,,_�,`i.,
?,�i; �i�M�llp/1� rNatwMrfmM. :t_.m..,�, wPIMn�
f1N&� WYa+ 141�Q
.µ;..e...
1f
l�MRHMOY�[�0ID1' L�pM{�
��-�ssaa r�zr+� ��vat� ��-,��a i
A 3''4bJ I-A1J
�a�� Y rsr,,� r ,r'`�� ta!
Kv�rnwrrfn+e r
w r '^�p,,. a �j�N
W
t *uaer� n q a t�.�.�"�,'
W_
d W
`r,
�'�v �.,�.u_ �.rx v_...�_�...:.: e�. .e.:.
.riwwas,w rwn.scrw�+n
t +�+iia�w�
�,j�3-Abd E�i7' �1..61�A7(C�N ?-A(�d .,..�.,.�..Y
.t.,�
�r
�'061349
C-:�
�r�r R��:x� ',�i -•..�""91�
C;�����I t�',E��R� �iURCH
N �p+�
e�zoo�a»E w ssu�+
��rii ���i■
�fl
�r�'
rrr�►�
1
t r �w
4
i
i
F
t
�__________w__________________�__�_�� _�r_T__�a_,
r
i tp„���
Y�
i x
«y 'S r i
l Y t
i
i
i 4 t 3 M�—�� f
Y_
i� i
S� 3 F i
1 x
i p t
��.i f
Y
M��
t t
1 F
�`X�w x
i
�1 r
�f
1 Li} t
i
f �i��,
r p r
p
�r� 4 '�1 '4
t
z
v,,..,�
�F•
r 1
i
i
r
r
r
j
E�,_
i
I
I
1
I
l
I
I
i 6 i
I f 3 i
y
I
a
1
i t
5pe f Z i
__.,_�______...9
+EI �._.,._�...,...�.............�.._�W_
?I R
�I P
11 I
I
I
I
I
i
n_�
'l.. v. .a.. ..v. .a v.
I
I
_J
����9�$s`°z�s.:aas:e#i�0#$�§� b�
-l��ec�, s�a��aiE, y sY�'s�
it4tlti bi1111! 41R4;
S�HE�DA���i������sffi�F��
I� �1 1 4
a y rn �i�
'°4
e #�t� t� ,�a+ a u�e«,ro� f
c� e�cr�c�,r� t x
t�r��r cHU� t�
1'�� c� raaza�E��
��.�.1
9�
i.....+.i..�r. Ls e
M
Y
fi_-� _.f...___��__ �._....�.___,-••....y........a..
i_ i p
tYllt U #f y
i j y� i
v
a t
�-r.;—�---
k i
�t i I
�1
R
�1
k c 9
t
�+'a, 1
ffi 3
i t a-` h
_a.
I f
g —I--- —,r +k
`f p 7
J y 3 s� ..J
L. `..m"
i
a�
m....m...._..�
wr
w
i I I
I lf f
j L�_ _�J
t i
1 ��i� i
i
1
��m__�T.��___
����!��i
s
K��
BROOKLYN
aEnr�� cH��c�
��z�a��
bz�
t
al!'¢ f S r
fi
a
r
f
r Y
I k
E
4
_v�y_______�sl,�.._e.____..__a
Y
i�i�■
��..,J
A
z�:�.:
o��
�..r.
��"ti""
,w
j
�M7�Y�lOD Y MP,M!fO i�R'1lII�i.M
plWU RM�tQ� 9SY!1pWtM
i' 'bl�'!A7 W G6
1dlIIIW.MMNO r�
,MiwM.� ig M +'��+M+�t Mi�
w i��
I�fqMnf
�W11 �NMi i
t ���1'R7 �4i�f/�\
P w. w
"�J+ �'i
i
°1° U2��
�..�u..�--�'
�l+IR �M!
oN�ew�* ,i""� .+IpM�'IR.+'�6�
WM�
WM
i �ea�e naaai
i f�,rbr'�t,r�s�,� i .r�e�,r� \/`,f\/ �0
a
rrr a we ri�us
+a:wr��rsr
rswaw»� r��s.
r_ .r w,w�ioa
BUtLC?�Ka BEGtIQhi
I. sU .o�
n a, re�w.uv �L*..'�`�r''
ew�raww� raw. A�a��
�.,a��;r r .�,a.
..---=a �d_�e.-� ._______...___...s
i �ii�iii����i��� �i�
i� i��� �i�iiii;�'ii���i�i��i
i
a-� �__�.s r-� �a�.���. �',t�=�
t A
i���i�! i�iii��iiiii i�ii
lIIIIIIIII �1111i11�11 Ik d_i� z.Ab.►
4 if�#'
l I I! I I! f 1 I I i"-__�._ I I I 1�1 I'l I! I I C'�
I I 1 i 1 I I i 1 I 1 I I I .�`M
t, I
I
�,i-1'.�.�., T.��!�-� swawa�waw�e
lilllilll IIIII pt
H,,,.,,,�,,,..,� I 1 I I I i I I f j 1 l I I''
rMMi/6NP� MO'#l
I I I f i I f1,��iTT"T�'- :e: .w�..� I f 1 I f
Illilllllliilil�l �II 1!I IIII
I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I t �i��
i t+�-�+t 3-+t a.�..M..
iiiii��i� �iii��iii 'iiii''
1
i i =k$ i
r
ii���„ ��t'�i
�-a�a i►i� ii�ii��� �i"� �r°�
w..�.
CS: �:�;t3' f ���4
,,,,f t.�Z
��l'I, �I Illli t r"'�''����
t i i i t y O
"i�i i�iiiiii �i�
...���r�
�..u�J I �-a�a g „n�,
�`i_`�` �"1 �t�i`�'
___r___�
a.�
w�e�wrr s
rs� �errw�
MR� M.MMJ iiMX�
�µ/y17� (��fM���11R1 �{�1Y11� ftMlrllA�11M�
NrI11�C�
y i! NI/II4
VS]��T�
��i
i
k
s
q
R �y
a
a
i
�a
w.,
e+i
4
I
To: City c�f Broaklyn Cent�r City Council M�.y 9, 2�07
The P g Commission ved plans s��bmitte�d by tbe Bmol�lyn �ent�rr Church
oft�e Na��+rene with a list of cwnsickrations and ad�iitio�t r�equiremcnts. Cin�e ofthe
r�irements was tha,t the Chur�h wouid i�nstall a si�c fc�t �igh fence o� rnr near t� wes�
pr�rperty line to st�en the vi�w of the pmposed lot f�om fhe �i�bc�rs. The
f�;�ce is to run th� len�th of tl� 1�P�Y tines of the t�ee homes just w�st c►f the church,
Att�ched are svme phcrtvs s�wwir�g:
1) ',t� cu�arent ce af the western property l�ne Ioakia8 we�st fromi the church.
2) The a�pearance of this properiy Iine after the is�stallation of t� 6 foot tall fence.
3} The apgearaace of this prop�riy line usin8 a livi.ng �+yreen ct�isti�►g c�f 1 t} evergre�
#rees an�d ev�rgc�een. bushes as �oposed in the laadsc;�ping P�an. T°�e bushes would 1�
�dj�t to Naz�rene Parsonage as it is advantageous for its occupants to be able to
s�e oato ti�e church Pro�' fram the upstairs diaing room ar�.
4) An �t�:rna#�ive p�untix�g of eveargreen trets in a mare clos�lY sps�d 1�#ern ta' P�vide
�lciitional s�reening.
Tbe Bro�akJyn Ceutec Church of th�e N�zarene is r�qaestin� th�t th� fence not be
r�qnr�red snd that #be taller, tiving acr�ea nsi� evergrr.�a tr+� �d bn�hes be
a�tt+�r1 imst�ad. Rc�as�ona for t63� inclade the fallv�rin►g:
1) The fence wuuid �ot k.eep headlights fmm the �rking Iot fiom shining iata tl�e uPP�'
of t�e t,wo houses located on properti� 'Y242 �i '725U C�md�en ,E4ve. We t�.ink
talle� t�s wnulcl.
2) A fs��e wouid t�e attractive to grat�iiti artists, and usec! fcn gang m�8s, etc.
3) Evcrgreen tr�s have �w�d absorbing charact�ristics, fenc�s tend io r�fleet st�und
back towards the st>urc� but do less tn deaden it�
4) 1Ne thin� the overai.l vaiue of aU properties bvarclering this P�P�3' tine are �nhaz�c�d
witi�i a s+wre�en cvmprise�l of tre�s and shrubs but may b� le��i if �lid fencing is used.
5) If a�ence and irees are used in combination, mai�teaance an the fenc� is impa�:d and
c� ��t���P�B af #he trees is impa�cted.
�'1�ank you for your cc�asideration,
Rev. Uean Potts
s,
t p.t�� �,t
a t,_ t �r�.`
t t L.r�" e »y� 1 a �j x� i"
�a. *,S� ;i� ����i� i� �3s
a�
.r
F x t
r
x
t
f x
r� �t� ��k e a 3
Y
s, i: �w+:a� �o.. x
i
,a.,...�,
e. E .Y-,t v� t� x�r.���x �r�=� 4 i �f z� 9i���,'!'�A�
c��_ r ^�'c.`�'' w
r,.,,r� .•.a�t �'+la.e �'�a, ��e'w�,n J `�`r y' 6 y .i
G "St.. x i C a� J Ae^ A. J A p::
�,�.r.; ���f.�',�1. n,." }ns�tr,"vCsT"+;.zi•er*F�` ',.�F Y3�+t,..��� JrYy, L� 1 z y r,:�T t'.? N�;y��".: k�� ��vi��,t�
�i.4 �.-!k r s Y �t :`f1�'+t'�' .C .ay�, ..,,i,,.;E) 's,�'�-��,,,��t` .��;.^��i. �4 L'� .tax.;d. �v,Y
+v ��zr���,�';�:�� z,�. "4� q „7 -�'{,,,,a 7; �_.S 2 i „a:i
7 f. �';r'�'., i i 7.. tt 'M.. Zi:1� f ;�.�`t J zr t t �rv,r'* x r$'�s,`!x"`�'+.��.�� fi°s
i;.. k=; t Yt c .2 tf ,,e+,' „y.
...'h '�.r:�', .S r �*.va� �t i.�,:� t'z� 4Sd^� r Y ;y'. r a �n ;'L ct 1
l v�+.V"�#'�:n �..±�'��4.�, r?� t��. 7 4 1�3 i ...a::.r `4. r*.. �i`�:.e s .;P "S, y s
4 x r t r i :;..t2t �y a ,:::t ^h 1 ri '��4,„ Z 'S. �s: i �a
�4+,� .,�'�i'°+�€ r.,. S. e�; i. ��e': *,v R �'r y .,'`i',s.,�, <1 2 n t,,.: t t x;i+ 3` `s:.S,� r�
v, ,r%_ .n�R F a v k a S -P'.�,� ��*'�t r y"� 5 r...:
'T.� ,x $�7�� .,s '��...,t- +r +t�� ic
�t t�
i y Y 1 y 9.'.. A.��'��`�' A ,�T f G
..z
2 d a"
a :k, Ai#�" �:v ta� rvw�g. =w� `';�,�A� .3 kr,�,q xx �,i„�:�� f
i r yw r����":`" .�r,:� v� i e 3 r y
,i ,i?�Y>„ :ri r v .t:t Mi:k,:S t t n ,;,�'h�r. ,k?'.w..: k� g�,Y,. *.s, }c ?�w:rt. ;�r �u,g� �ri*�.
Re.*4 N• 2 �w l s e a G. y e; ��r� r?�lyy�'' 3i .�.<t �h.
��'`#}',�,.r�� hnYr� #e%�� Q t `.a t w n r �T' ��'x. �,p�, Y*";"r
N��'hM �F�, n�`��+c �Yi'xM�.i i.� l :�tx �'�'P'•p,T, '�.:.,u',,�a�`f �.s;Y y
M •i
�r.�* .'.�s.�.'� ,c�.ti]'an 4. �::r r r ..r..� r�, ''7>0 a'r.''1 8�1 '4""�` �+r.:i6��.� �1,�. n:�
5 eav��{� y �r c. `4
,�,t� i ri a 2Y�t y��� 's� A
�����.���yy a"7,,.u, i .....a+.t
'tz.r' ..,.L.r..-.r.,�.4.n�...�......,.w-,....,..wrr.�..a r.:., i �r':� 7
y r�
V' mx.�� n r�� k C l
r_ r
.�r+ t
r-
„a•'
d
t
5 4
f �<.t,��
.W..� yl'.. .,t P`
a �w�
y �'"i?r� n n. S. .i r� .l
s
Y r
t e
1�
p
R� �«y.... �����aa
�3 4
f
�u x r
4 4�a�i
i
1 h t
d;' 3. t� i 2� i
s L
s 1
Z e a L�� i ��t �T
1. y I�I Y 1{ �p .t'
e.F�i t t g T 2 C 3
4
f. y
y
I1 i
r
f
1 ✓M' g
r
}�Ek¢s d'��'� j�x ��3 L:� .a._��� r' k tx t Ti F' x^ i �k" t.
p t. a�+W' ;.a s �,�o- e y x :C -l�" *��R ,rr �a�`: �'K�' W r: S J y 3
t
C:e� ,«+1 x i t'..�`'qw'�" y �'�z�y�''4r+' `.i.��:>"4. 9r t*�' t^Fr,�L d ..�t'"i�' ��d,,.t�^w"` hi'�� a
!r. '^f. s h r y �t.r�?�� �t"' l�`�t��� r*i ai r ��Y y�+� }'s' ��e
p F r ��'.�.,,�°k�.� :3r v y�„� 'rp,� q Y �r�r i 'r� r d .�ro y
r �i+y>.�+.?4^Y5r*'x1�M�.='a� r� s 4 s'��:*.4�i�k�' �Ci����`�`L"»,�.,Fe��,�i�,,,�'c.^#�.+„' f�;("�,rty" ;;ss�d�'i�:.:.•�».',�f.��eb.�.;r,�'t,�,'S�L^i;,'��+' 3+r:
°K _..d_ y�...,.......M..�,.iN..-....-..,,,..�.,..�,.,�. ,.r..�..�,r,'
...r.�....-..�-.�-`-."'^�'
d
y <,x
y
P
<�T� t��,'�
t
J r
ti
f
k i 1 h A i+. y. i�
..'t f Y q
y 5 3 .1 J' J j f y ,x
i. t t.
Y 1S 3 a x 9 tM'-
6 �r
�A �s t"a°d' J r }�j�2
'w �r i: y
M ,r i4 ,X"�' �t,� r
r
e
r
SU1 ?S fv n.
�,,�mo�l�� ��r�� c� ll��r�� �r'�'CS v�? u1PS'�' f��� �it�
a
,t
,,,w
4 r ��i'
.s t�
.'T,. `�s r� s::+
r
4�. 1
k,
ti
n n.'rr r 1 {fi3-�" w,.. �;,.;roc .7�e �-r"`�i�*
r' t �t
"A "'t ��E��� t j`�x�' e i i .hw i
1c %��F.♦ 3'�;�r`'"� z 2zx.�
�p ;d
8 �i a'�:hr r
a
,�tiv .�S .s• s n ti' x C�rl R qfi
e.
s.
�x;.+ �'t� t i
x.,.�
I
Y 4
�%e
.�4
:;Y
t.... k
4
a
r,
.�i
k
ii
i
l
i
u
,.".r.
..�1
E
�i
5
r
t:
.:...i:
U
W
i
.<'i u 3 t.'
'i
e 5
t
f
%i'
..j
..i d
'y :t
s
t.
g
.,E-::
s
a P
L
..U�� i
v. i:
�i
rz
..r
t
.e
l.
e,� 4:
a
v..:. y
a�F�4 i�#r F�r'�:. sN +Y��Va j i�M���
s
3
f
x.::
.,r
..:5
,„.0
:.'s ,S
3
y
"r
�,�E.
�o.::
r ..i
r.
t.
r
..7"r
s"� 4 k.
y
i
'r
.i.': :i
W
Y i
v
l.
.y �.i:
::"r..
X
..�,i' 4
i
2;
l.
F
j
v
i
F
m
4
i
x
4
S'
i
E
.:e
e
...i
v a N' •.i:
r lr
3
v
c`.
i
S 4
E'
.F i .:i•
l
••i
f
�q
'S E' ...rz i.
'..i
i:
F
.'::i
r
r: i••
.::n
r x
s...
COUNCIL ITEM MEMURANDUM
T4; Gurt Boga�ey, City Manager
FROM: Todd Blomstrom, �irector of Public Works
DAT�: May 7, 200'7
SUB,7E+CT: Resolution Accepting Quotation and Awarding a Contract, Iknprc�vement Project
No, 2401-16, Contract 2U07-E, 20{}7 Diseased Tree Remava�
itecommendati�n:
Public Wor�CS s�affrecornmends tlxat the Brooklyn Center City Council aceept the lowest quotation
and �ward a cc�ntract ta AAarbor Design Tree Service, Inc. far Imprave�ent Prajec�t No. 2007- 6,
Contract 2�07-E, 2�t?7 Uis�ed Tree Removal
�3sckgronnd:
'TMe �ublic Works D�pariment has administered a Diseas�d Tree �temuval progr�m since 1974 and
annually establishes a project to �xpedite the removal af diseased and other nuisance trees as defined
in City +(�rdinance Chapter 217.
When a diseased tre�e is marked on the boulevard, the city shares in hal� the cast of the remc�val
pravided ihe remova� is conductecl under the City's annual L?iseas�cl Tree Removal contract. The
property owner is invoiced far ha�lf the cost of the remaval.
'V1�hen a d�sease�i tree is marked c�n private property the property owner is respc�nsible for the removal
and dis��al of the tre�e. City staff informs property owners ofthe importanr,� of remc�vin� diseased
trees tQ minimize the pr�pagatic�n of tree diseased to adjacent praperti+�s. If a PropertY owner fails ta
remove d�s�as�d tree, the City acquires a qnotation fram the contractor for CY�e cast of removal.
'The quotatior� is prssent� ta the property owner prior to prcaceedi�ag with rem�val af the diseased
iree.
Unpaid charges for tr+ee remQVal are levied as a special assessment a�ainst the resp�ctive parcels of
tand. Special assessrr�ent� are [evieci over a period of five yea�rs. The five y�ar payment prograrn
assists manY P�P�Y �wners with financing tree removal costs.
Approximately 1SU tr�s wer� marked for removai under last year's progra�an, 57 of which were
removed by the City's tree cc�ntta�ctor, The City's tree insp�ct4r antic�pates that there wiIl be
rninimal increa�es in the number ofdisea�sed trees that will be maric+�3 far rem4val in 2t}47.
13udget Tssnes:
The City's sb�are +af the cost of remova! for diseased trees within the public righ,t-c�f-way and City
prvperty is includ�c! in the 2t?C?? Budget under the Public Works Fvr��try operaiing bud�et.
Disense Tree Removal Resolution
Member intraduc�d the following resalution and moved its
adoptit�n:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESt�LUTION ACCEPTING QUOTATIQN AN� AWARUING A CQNTRACT,
IMPROVEMEI�tT PROJECT NO. 2007-ib, Ct�NTRA�T 20f�7-E, 2(ND7 DISEASED
TREE REM4VAL
WHEREAS, staff solicited quotations from five qualified t�ee remc�va�l contractars az�d the
following quc�tations were areceived and opened on Apr�l 16 �UO7 �C1I' IIYI�'ftUYB2Y1�11t PTOJ�CC NQ
2007-16, �ontract 2U07-E, 2007 I}�s�ased Tree Remav�l,
Bidd�r Bid Atno�rtt
ArbQr Design Tree Service Inc. $47,933.95
S& S Tree Horticultural Specialists $S3,G85.00
WHEREA�, it appears that Arb�or Design Tree Service, Inc. is the low+est respQr�sible
bidder far Improvern�t Projecx No. 2047-16.
1'+1�1�, THEREF(3RE, �E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of tlxe City of Brooklyn
Cent�r, M�nesota, that the City Manager is hereby autho�iz�cci tc� enter inta a eon:tract with Arbor
�esrgr� Tree Service, Inc. in the name of the City of Brooklyn ��nter fflr Tmpmveme�t Prc�ject N�.
20fl7-16, 2{�4'7 Diseased Tree Remaval according to th� plans and specifications on file in the saffice
af the Airector of Public W4rks.
Mav 14, 2tK}7
Date Mayc�r
ATTEST:
City Clerk
'I'he rarrtion for the adoption Qfthe faregoing resotution was duly second+� by memb�r
and ugon vote being tak�en therean, the following vated iz� favor thereaf•.
and the following vot�d a,�ainst the same:
whereupon said resulution was declared duly passed and adopt�d.
4
4
I
f
a
r
c
3rc
i
..c
4
r.;
x. ':o:
i
'.a
.s '.:i
,:FF
s
z
's
z
T
z
z
:z
e
E
�i:
.:a
i,
.t
.t:
Y ::;r
,fc
i
�����r.�" 4�?� 5� a����M��'.��� +��Nry���}���M���+�+� ���x� �F n� y�
��i:'
:�.i .e:!
r.
t
r
:�i
i
4
.i
4
y
Y
r:' v
c.
r
y
v
...i:
.:i
.a.
i
.s
I;:� y,
i
4
i
a
1:
'tr i:: �z
5
:'v. t
e
k
.i
..i
:ie
e
r
i. :i
C 'i
i
r ..ey
.:n
i.:
w
.v n�:
3
J
�i,
i.
:s
.i
e
2
n...:
V
F
::i
y
w.... .:c
c..
v
:s '..s
n
nv
I
p
':...I :r
t
Y:s .i 'i..
n'.�:
�i Y y.
..��f;'
..:y e
i
i
E�'.
i
v.
i
.v
a
h;
y
..>a,. a, .i..... ...YxYv. ....e.........
4 i
___..a �,_r� _.m_...
cour�+��L rTEM ���o�arrnu�
T'O; Curt Boganey, �ity Manager
FRUM: Tcc�dd Blomstro�xt, Director of Public Works i��+°
D►ATE: May 10, 204']
SUBJECT: Itesolution Accepting Bid and Awarding a Ccr�tract, iamprowement Froject
Nas. 2U07-01, 02, 03, and 04, Contract 200'7-A, Freeway Bauleva€rd �d
Shingle Creek Parkway Street, Storm Drainage and tJtility Improvem�nis
I Recomme�d�tic�n.
Public Works staff recammends that the Brooklyn Center �ity Cvuncil accepc the Ivv�rest
respansible bid anc3 award a conkract ta Hardrives, Tnc. for Improv�ment Praject Nas. 20Q7-
O1, U2, 03, 04, Freeway Boulevazd and Shingle Creek P'arkvvay Street, Storm Draina�e and
Utility Improvements based on the bid results provid�cl bela�r.
B�ckgrvund.
Bids ft�r #he Freeway Baulevard and �hingle Creek Farkwa�y Street ar�d Utility Improvements
contract �,rvere received and opened on April 18, 2407, The biddiang results are tabulated as
follou+s:
Bidders Bid Amount Corrected Amouni
Har�lrives, Inc. �1,427,782.4i
I�latth �Taile�+ $1,470, I 62.85
Northwest Asp�alt $1,479,OSS.S7' $1,481,7S5,S']
Knif� River $1,483,625.16 �1,483,�67,16
C. S. McCr�ssan $1,579,179.05
Midwest As�halt $1,621,753.55
+�f the six (b) bids received, the lowest bid of $1,427,782.41 was submitted by Hardrives
In�., of F.ogers, Mi�anesota. A review of the references a�d Iist of subcon�ractors provid�d by
Hardriv�s, Inc. indicates thai #hey have the experience, equipment aand capacity tc� qualify as
the lowest rr�spansible bidder for the pcoject.
Sewer Caz�acitv
Un April 16, 2(�? che City established preliminary redevelopnnent goals £or the I-694 site
I consisting c�f t�e former Olive Garden, Cracker Barrel and Days Inn. The C�u�cil discuss�d t��
pc►t+��ia.3 co�shucti�n of a 540,O�QU square-faot affics building on #his site as pc�t�ntially th�
maximw� density re�ievelopm�nt land use for the I-694 site.
Freeway 131vd rurtl Shingte Creek Farkway Improver�ents Contract Awurd
Ciry ojBr�okl�n Cenrer
v ment site flows ta the sani sewer co�lectior� system
Wastcwater frorn the I-6�34 r�cie elop �Y
���n�ling along the pc�rtion of Freeway Boulevard 65�` Avenue include�d in Improvement
Proje,ct Nos� 20U'�-Ul, 42, 03 and t}4. This street reconstruction praj�t d€�es nat involve the
replacement of sanitazy sewer ta provide for substantiai increases in wastewater flow from the
I-b94 redevetaprnent site.
City staff conduc�ed an analysis of the water consumptian vf tlie farmer lanci uses wit�in the
I-694 site an�cl estimated the water conswnption fram a pot�n�ial St}0,00{� square-foot d�'ice
comple�c. Upon completion of this analysis, staff direct�i a consultant t� conduct an
ind�endenC re°view of the potential wastewater flow impacts from the I-694 reti�:veloprnent
pla�ns. The eonsultazit pmvidetl a summazy report, whiah is attached to fil�.is memor�nd�un.
Bas�d a�n the results af the sewer capacity analysis, sta�F recommends that th� City Councii
proce�i vsrith the proje.�t under the cwrer►t design without replaeement of the existing sanitary
sewer a�long 65�` Avenue between Humboldt Avenu� and I7upont Avenue. How�ver, th� Cit�y
ne�is to e�tablisl� a wast�rater capacity limitation on the I-694 sit�, The maucimum wastewater
dischatge from the �-694 si�e would need to be limit� to 15,U40 gallc�ns per t�ay. To put this
capacity lirnitacion into persp�tive, 15,000 gallons per day is approximate�y e.c�uivale�t ta three
tim� the vfr�stewater di�char�e from the City-Coun#y Federal Crec�it Union (jffice building (the
glass office buildin�; along Sumrnit Drive).
Budget Isaues:
Th� engineer's estimat� for the project is $1,655,062.�0 W}11GI7 1S ��OVP� �1� Td1]�P„ OF�C �31C�S
re+c�ive�d for ct�e prQj�ct. Many sauarces indicate that there is a sh�rtia$e t�f cotatraci work
currently available fc�r the 2�70? construction seascan, Gont�act laiddi�g �as become very
competitive this spring. The lowest bid &om Harc�rives, inc, is approxi�ately 14 percent
below th� en�ineer's estimate for the �roject.
f'reek B[vd antl Shingle Creek Parkway lmprawements Contract Award
City of Brooklyrt Genter
�..r�,►
April 30, 2tX}7 RE; Braoktyn Center, Minnesrrta
Fre.�vray Boe�lev�rd Flow Mtraitoriti�
Prc+posed I-69� Redevelap�neut
SEH No. A-BRUG'I`t}604.O1 14.00
Mr. Tadd Blomstrom
Pubtic Wc�rks Di�re�ta�r
City of Bra.�clytt Ceater
6301 S�ingle Cte�ek Parkvv�y
Br�lclyn Ganiicr, MN .�5�3U-2299
Dear Mr. Bl�m:
At your SEH }�as reviewed the pnevious evaluarion of the 8-inch sanitary �eewwer call�tiaa pi�
�g Fz�vay �aul�vard at Em�crs�n Avcnue. It is o� underst$ndiag tb�t t�e City of` &rac�klyn Cenier is
going to overlsy Freeway Bc�ulevard and a aew office complex has be�n by a develop� west af
this ar�. Tb�e rc�ckveioped area could impact tb� total wastew�r vvlume passing through the sanitary'
srwver �llecq�a pipe aloag Freeway Boulavard. Last suinmer, an Iscc� Model 215{) flow me�er was
installtd in au 8-inch pipe sectiou just soutb of tbe Brooklys Ceater High 3chool at E Avenue.
The flow sneter was imst�tled on R�ay 19, 200b aud removed aft+�r three rueeks r�n Jume I3, Depth
and veLacit�+ info '+�n collcctcd during the thr�e wak moniic>ring pe�icxi was used to cal�ul�e flow
rates si minu#�e intervals. �4s r�ported earlier, tbe avearage flaw �ac}� day was appr�axianately
l i35,0Ait galloas p�er ++�t�a� with flaws r�aging from 60 to l 2Q �allcros pe�r mi�ute (�pm). 7'he pi�e has an
aggm ��paCity c�f 250 gp�n. Uturing a typical day, the pipe flow depth is be#wc.en 3 to 4 inc�ie�s of
#lt�w.
Re�+e�t1y, a develt�r l�as propc�sed redevelopment of the I-G44 corrid4r upstream (w�stj o�'tbe study area
from th�e cutr�nt ial mix of hc�tel and restauranis iata a cornglex with approxim�tely SOQ,t�Q
s�uare feet of �ffice space, We have rcviewad the flow mo�aitari�g data fnam l�st summer aad tlae wster
recamds frnrn the currer�t �t� (19ays Inn, Olive Ganden a�d Craceka�e Barrel} iau order dete�nino the
wast�watet ity t, a�f any, the p�oential raievelopmcat wsxu�ld have c�n thc cwrcent sauitary sewear
r.ollractiot� s�t�m alat�g F�way Houlevard. Ue Apri120, 2U47, the city grovided laist�rrical waur
rr�s r�cor� fc� the t�srCe cw7ent busine�ses mention�i abave and w�r recs�rds f�ar similar
e�rcial office �pace 1 in Bro�lclya Genter.
on em ev�lua�iaz� of the wat�r r�ords, che total daily wastew�tcr comr'sbution (bez�+e:e� l 0,110U and
16,00(l �d) fr,�m the �d 5{10,00U squ�re faet of oPhce apacc sci fram the red+erretopment will
l�cely be a 'tm� fir�m tb�e e�sting wastatwater c�atribntit�s of Days Ir�n, C}iive Garde� �nd zhc
Cracicer Bsrrel (ap�rn�c�imately 23,� Spd?. The moet conservative scenario would be reductit�n t�f
'T,4U4 gallc�s I�r daY {gpd) or aboui 7 pencet�t reciuction in flc�w along Freeway Boul�vard. Assuxtaing tbe
of'�ce b�u and ti�e cusr�nt cammcrcial psopertie,s have simi�er w water disc d�ring the day,
t1� avera�e daily flows wnuld be agpraximatsiy 100,tI00 gpd. Usin� t� aver�ge d�►ily �ow ta s1low�ble
peaic �+aur flow rate {3.1) �fished by the Metropolitan Council Env' tal Serviccs (A+iCE5), the
peak. hour flc►e�v r� wQUld t� 225 gallc�ais per nninute (�m} or 325,1� �pd. The "ty of t3�e sanitazy
sevver line alt►ng Fa eeway Bc>ulevard should not be issue in the �ctions of pipe of t�en i�ac}�es oz laxger.
n wwe. asas vsa� e.,muer a�. si� h�+# 5�'fi10�S1�
lihat
SEH �s mn ee�wl opportunkY +pnP�7ro� 1 www.s�hi�t,aom I 651.490.204D 800,325,2D�'+ I 651,4�t.2180 tax
Mr. `I'odd Hlomstrom
Apri13p, 2007
Pagc 2
The short secticm of 8 inch pipe as stated earlier, has a capacity of 2SQ ggm o� tb�e pre�vious f�ow
mvnitnring. From #he data provided by the City and thc rosults nf the tlow rnonit+�ring, it agp�ars tlse
eight inch scct�aa ctf pipe has thc ca�racity under both the cucrsnt aad proposed deveiopments with ti�c
foltowin� arssumptions;
•'i'� saaitary sewer coll+ection pige aiong Freeway Bctulevard is prc�perly rnainta,i�ned and cicsitc�d
cm a regular mai� s�hedulc.
Any future lsad u�e ci�nges bcycmd the pmposat ehan$es outlincd u�tder t�his revi�w s�►auld be
+ev�lu�t�d to dcterminc if they increas� the averagc dail�r wast�vvater ftaws along Freeway
BQ�leva�d.
Tbe curs�e�at ev�luatioa asswnt,s inflow and iafiltcation (I/I} is �at siga�i�c.a�nt in the area of t�e
Freeway Boulevazd. Flow monitoring wss not coaducted during a significant rainf�Il ev�t. If UI
rs siganifir�t in this area, the pipe siu wilt not have the size needeci w accommads�te the
aciditional clear wattr.
T�e eight inch �auruitar�+ sewe�r c�llectirnn pipe ia qru:ti� da� produc� flow rates w2�ieh reach 4U to 50
p�rtent of it� full cap�ity on a daily basi�. Agaiia, wittwat rsin#'a1l ianf�on and addi�o�nat monitoring
during significa�t rain€all eve�nt, it is di#�icult w detencnine if the wast�water flmuvs cauld be even baigher
under tb+e r`sgt►# coa�itions during a rainfall evcnt. The eigi�t inch se�tiog afpipt will fiutction ef�'e�ively
under thc �ptio�s outtin� above. It does nat appear that the pot�atisl re�#evetcrpment af the I�94
corri+�CCrr will c�snge the wastewater flow conditio�ns w incr�asa the si� of the eight inch p�pc �lcmg
F'are�wsy Soulevsrcl.
1f you have any queaticros rnr c. You can ccfntact me st 65 I.490,2144 ar Sue Masan at
SS 1.440.201$.
Sincez�ely,
SHi}I�T ELLIi7 RI+CKSON INC,
Kirby aa� Note, P.E.
Pr�oject e�
kr+n
Attac t
c; Suc SFii�
1 M3Q07Auc
Member introduced the fctllawin� res4lurion and moved its
adoptittn:
RESOLUTION NC}.
RESOLUTI�N ACCEPTING BID AI`�I3 AW�l31NG A C4NTRACT,
IMFROV`EMENT PROJECT NOS. 20{�'7-01, 43, AND 04, C(?NTRACT
2tH}fi-A, FREEWAY B4ULEVARD ANU �HII�IGLE CI�.EE� P.�KWAY
STREET, STORM I}RAINAGE AND UTTLTTY TMFRt3VEMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisern�nt for bids for Inlprc�vement Pmject Nas.
20U7-01, 02, 03, and bids were received, ap�ned, and tabulated by the City Clerk and
Engin�er on th� 18�' day af April, 2007. Said bids vvere as follows:
Bidders Bid Amount Ce�rrecied Amount
Hardrives, Inc. $1,427,782.4I
NQrth Valley $1,470,162.85
I�iorthwest Asphalt $1,479,055,57 �I,48I,?55.57
IGnife River $1,483,625.16 �1,483,967.16
C. S. McGros��n $1,579,1?9.05
P�Iidwest Asphalt $1,G21,753.55
WHEREAS, it appears that Hardrives, �c. is the lQwest res�nsible bidder.
NfJW, THERE�(?RE, BE IT RESt?LVE� by the City Gouneil c�f the City af
�rov�lyn Center, Minnesata, that:
l. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authonz�d to enter ini� �a cantract
with �ardrives, Inc. af Rogers, Minnesota in the n�me of the City uf
Brooklyn Center, for Improvem�nt Fraj++ecct Nos, 2007-01, U2, U3, and 44,
accc�r+dit�g to #he plans and specifications thereft►re approved by the City
Cc�un�il and on file in the office of the City Engineer.
2, A maximum wa#er consumption r�te of I S,UOQ ga1l�r�s per day is hereby
es�abtished for the I-694 Redeve�opment �it� consistin� af th� former 41ive
Garde� Restaurant site, former Cracker Barr�l Restau�ant site and the former
Days Inn Hotel Site. This maximum water cbnsumptiun rate sha13 i� used
for pla�uaing future land uses for the t-fi94 Redevelopment Site.
RESC)I�UTION N+C).
3. The es#irna�ted project costs and revenues are as follows;
GOSTS En�ineer's Estimate As Amended Per Lc3w Bid
Contract 1,654,704.U0 1,427,?82.41
C4ntingency 107.0�00.04 1
Subtotal +Gonstructian Cost 1,761,7U�.4Q $1,534,7$2.41
AdrninfLegallEngr. 119,00(}.00 119,flU0.�
Itefarestation 2.St3U.00 2,S4d.04
�'otal Estimat�ed Prc�ject Cost 1,883,20�.(}4 1,656,282,41
REVEd+IUES En¢ineer's Estinnate As Amended Per Low Bid
Stre+et Assessxnent 529,131.OU 529,131.C�4
Water tJtility Fund 3S,60U.(}� 29,911.4t}
Sar�itary Sewer IJtility 114,7tK?.OU 67,b54.35
Siorm Draina$e Utility Fund S 127,300.aU 1�2,422.'10
EAA (Otive Garden �ite� S 34,9{�}.OU 23,830.97
Siree� Cc�nstruction Fund 132,640.�10 102,1t}(}.20
MSA Constructic�n Fund 912.9�69.�? 791,231.?9
Total Estimated Itevenue 1,883,200,� 1,655,282.41
Mav 14, 2U07
Uate Mayor
A'TTE�T.
City Clerk
Tl�e m+uti�n for the adoption of ihe f�regoing resolution was duly sec�nded by mem�r
and upon vots being taic+�� �here�n, the following voted in fav+or th�r+eaf:
and t�e following voied against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
t
k
Z,
4
.n
t a
i
s
::i
i
,.w
3
5
3
'2_ ..4 f
'i: :.�.e
�i E ..,i
:.a
t
5.
....i. a .:'S
4
s
�r�
�i n
y
1
1
i.
y �:a
1 1 y
���*�A" ���TT1�+�II����� �i������1� *r��������� 'lF �rV� a.�.
4�
n
n
l
l�
r
i .r
0
t
`..o:: .E.
..:i .t
,...Y
1
l
s
i:: i
f A
4
::i
t
Y: r.
5
.i:
:i :i::
s
,t.:::'
S
.:v:.
'r
r.
F:
X
i
r ..r
.:..i
p`
u
s
l
n,
t
.i
.,y
F
.c s
..,:o
t
4
s
n
..n�. �..e,... ....'.i ..........a�.> c._'>:...�...
u
_Y .,.,xv_
i
cou�vc��, iT�M M��a�a►�vnt�r�
TU: Curt Boganey, City Manager
�UM: Todd Blam�tr4m, I�%rector af Public Warks
DATE; May 7, 2047
SUBJECT: Resoiutian Establishing Impmvement Proj�ct �Tos. 2QU8-01, 02, 03, and 04,
Confiract 2QU8-A, Maranatha Mea I�tei�hba�ood Street, Starm Drainage and
C.7tiliry Improvemer�ts
R�ommendation•
Public VV`orks s�a€f recor�rnends that the Brooklyn Ce�t�r Gity Council apprt�ve Ehe attached
resolution es#ablishing the 2008 Residential Neighborhoc�d Street, Storm I)rainage, and Utility
Improvemenis referred to as the Maranatha Area Nei�;hbc�nc��od Proje�t and ard�ring the
P�Paration of a project feasibility report.
Background:
In 200$, the City will be enterit�� the 15`'' year of its lang-range street arzd utility r�habilitation
progratn, referx'�ed to as the Neighborhood Street and Ucility Improvemez�t Program, The
prflgr�m has ccynsist�d of a systematic rehabilitation and/ar r�prlacement of the City's aging
infrashvcture, This program has included the reconstruction c�f public streets, replacement of
deteriorati�ag wat�r and satutary sewer facilities, and the construction of new storm sewer and
cirainage facitities. In additian, other neighbarhoad improvements are aft�en considered as parc of
the prujects, including park and lighting improvements, lands�cape improvements, and #raffic
conirc�l imprvvement.
I�► accc�rdance with the 5-year Capital Improvements Pro�arn (CIF), an area referred to as the
Maranath�. �rea 1*teigl�borhoc��i has been programmm�d far improvements in 2�� {see attached
map f�r specific stre�t lc�cations). At this time, staff requ�sis th�t ths City GQwn:cil establish this
2008 street and uti�ity i�nprovement project so that investigativ� engin��rin� work may be�in.
The Ma,ranatha ,Are�. Neighborhaod project consists of approximately 2.7 mil�s of streets and
utiliti�s, The nei�hborhood consists of approximately 233 res�dential properties and thre�
�om�nnercial iristitutional properties. 'T�►e project is expected ta include replacement c�f
significant porti��s �af existing water main, sazutary sewear and stt�rm draina��e systems in the
project area. The existing streets are highly deterivrated thrc�ug�out a rnajority of th�
neighborhood.
I
Mtrranatha t�nnprvvemc�nts 1t,esvl�ttic►n
Typica.11y, in order for a groject to be completed wlthin a specified cal��d�r year, pretiminary
d�si�n rnust comm�nce almosi one year in advance, This includes initiation of the public
natificatic�n and p�rticipation process that eonsists of informing aff�cted propert}r awners;
conducting field surveys; at least iwo public informat�onal meetin�s; and an extensive amount af
inforn3atic�n �d data collection. Initial design also inctudes detailed te�ch3nical engineering wark,
undergr+�und infrast�ructure inspectic�ns and assessments, and scyyi3/geotechnical investigatic�n�.
Upon au#hori�ation by tl�e City Cc�uncil, El�e following a�t�ons would take pi�►ce:
W Gcill�t data, �nc�uding field surveys, traffic counts, and review ofmainten�ce reco�ds.
Conc�uct televised inspectit�ns of the sanitary sewers and soiU�eateek�nical investigations.
Conduci an ini�al public infarmational meetin$ in November to present initial findin�s to
the n�ight�rhood, and to gauge public interest in the improvement project.
•�are a feasibility rep4rt for review by the City �ou�tcil. The City Council could then
aonsider setting a date in February for a projeet hearing.
To d�te, t3te City has completed 59 miles of local street and utility reca�structian since initiating
tt�e Neigti►borhood Impr�vement Program. This represents approximately 56 g�rcent of the tatal
iucal roaclways within Brookl}m Genter,
Budge# Issnes,
The Mar�nat� Area Neighborhond Sfireet and Utility Irnprovemen# project is identified in the
City's Capital Improvem�nt Pmgram. The estimated cast for pr+�liminary field work and
preparatian of a proje�# feasibility re�port is $41,SOO.UU.
Maranatha lmprovements Resolutio�
Street and Utility Improvement Program
.N.
j j
«r� i 7 2 '�a., p e
a.. y r
r
X y r.��. ft P....�.
z i t
3 R....,,. y �i l
i M i
i ...:-.b.�. y� a:�� .w•
A �.A•
ratcz yN i C
d 4 b w
r t �.,,r
i W g
4, 6 a g i w S 4
i ,M�:,�..
a
�z t
o...�
�•w
s
f �s
r�,.. �,y I�
e
i O a
s e
1 s
prw�n. s
rM�� F Y
ro.n. e e a e
a
S
TJ nr .r 7
Tentarive Reconstruction Year
a COMPLETE 2014
2007 2015
d
2008 2016
20d9 2017
2010 2018
Miles of Total 2011 2019
Completed to Date 58.7 56%
2007 2021 46.1 qq% 2012 2020
Totals 104.8 100°k 2013 2021
MerCh 2007
Member introduced the following resolutian and move+d its
adoptian;
RESt)LUTION NO.
RES{�I.UTIQN ESTABI.ISHING IMPI�QVEMENT PR.t�JE�' NQS. 2008-01,
02, 03, AND 04, +�QNTRACT 2008-A, MAR.��.i�ATHA AREA
NEIGHBC1RHQflD► STREET, STORM I)RAINAGE A�TU L�TTILITY
IMPRt3VEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City's Capital Impmvemen�s Pr�gram identifies sp�cific streets
for proposed infrastructure imprt�vernents in 2008; and
WHEREAS, the City Cfluncit has reviewed the seope c�fpropnsed improvements
for 2{�8 in the Maranatha Az�a Nei�hborhoad; and
'UUI�HEREAS, the City Council desires co �gin ih� pro�ess c�� informativn
g�tlaering and sc�licitatian of public com�nents.
N�W, THEREFt}RE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Gauncil af the City of
Bro4klyn Cent�r, Minnesota that:
1. Improvement Proj�t Nas. 2008-01, 02, (?3, a�nd 04, Maran�tha Area
Nei�aiborht�ad Street, St4rm Drainage and Utility Impr4v�nnents are
h�reby established.
2. Sta#�' is directed to begin field work, contact property owners in the
neighborho�i #o obtain comments and input, and ho�d public
infc�rmational rneetings for pro�rty owners in tl�e neig�banc��ad where
improvements are proposed.
3, The City Engineer shall preparr� a pruject feasibilit�r �eport for revi�w by
the City Ccauncil in February 20U8.
4. Estimated proje�ct cosis for pre�imiva�y field wcrrk, g�ote:chnical
investig�tions, �nd sewer televisin� costs are as folIov�rs•,
CC?ST AMOttN'�'
Tel�vising l 5,8�,00
Field S�urvey l 1,7Q4.(�}
G�s�t�chnical investigation 14,QU0.((�iD
Estimated c�sts S 41,SQU,t�}
REVENtTES AMOUNT
�anitary Sew�r Utility Fund 22,22S,flU
Water tJtility Fund 6,�425.OU
Stt�rm Sewer U#ility Fund S 6,425.t�t}
S�reet Ct�nstruction Fund 6.425.(}U
Estimat+�d Revenues 41,SU0.t?('?
._,__�_M.
I
RES(}I.UTIC}Iri NC),
Mav 14. 2a07
Date Mayor
ATTE�T:
Gity C1erk
The motic,n for tt�e adoptiva� o#'the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upo� vote b��ng taken thereon, the foilowing voted in favor thereof;
and the fi�llowing vot�d against the same:
whereupon sa�a�d resolutit�n was d�clared duly passed and adc�pted»
i
i
l
v�.
..i.
v.
...h
i
r. ;5
r
't'..'. �.r .i
..2 i
5
...a .c.
4
f
h
F
r,^
r
i
r::.
x
3
l
y
5
.5
y
u i
...y
'n.
H
.:e
5.
v
ti
'r
°i
i,
l
•R
:i
h
+�l�� �i��'"�l� '3 r�r��� x� ���MM�''�.
..i
r
k
z
..;F.:<
ti
a:,..��
t
E
a t
.+...s
'i k
y
i,
,a
r
w
...y'
,y
s
4
..;y
�s 1 :3
S
5
..�i: :q
r
.:::4 'i
T;
i:
.v.i.
tY.>
i� 'i
h
x 7
.e.:
i: :r
.y
i
v.
m
E.^;
S
I
a. t'
x
:.J v
r..:. .i.:
n
.::p
..x ..y�, .r..
:i
c:
x' 5 ..8vi... e
CO�TI�ICIL ITEM MEMt�RAND[JrM
T�l: Curt Baganey, Ci�y Manager
FR13M; Tc�cid Blc��strom, Director af Pubtic Warks
DA.TEt May 7, 2007
SU�JECTs Resalutie�n Authorizing Acquisition of Easernertt al�ng Willow Lane North
Reeamme�dation»
Public Wc�rks staf'�r�cvmrnends that tl�e Brooklyn Center City Council authorized #he acquisition
af easement alar�g th� southern partion of Willaw Lane for the pt�r�ses c�f constructin� a new
sidewalk cannection i�etwe�n Interstate Highway I-694 and Avenue Nortla.
Backgaroundz
On Ap�il 9, 2U07 the City Cour�cil awarded a contra�ct for cc�nstructiot� of tk�e Itiverwood Area
N�ighborhuod Street and Utility Improvernent project. Tl�is project inelud�s sidewalk
irnprovements along the southem �rtion of Willow Lane b�tw�n 66�' ,A+.venue l�tarth and
Interstate Highway I-694. The proposed sidewalk addition was origu�ally iden#ified during ihe
pr�ject pian�ing process io provide a pedestrian connectivn between #he terminus of the
Ncarth Mississippi Regionat Trail on the north side of �-694 aFnd the beginning of the West River
Road ped�si� t�ai� at 66�' Avenue North.
'The projeet feasibilifiy �tudy presented to the City Council oz� Jar�u�ry 2007 idenii�i�d the need
is� acquire easement along the south�rn portion of Wiliaw Lane ta atlow constn�etion of th� new
sidewalk segment. The attached map shows the extent of the easement need�d for cc�nstruction.
Staff has nego#iat�d a purcl�ase priee for perpetual �nd tem�rary �asements fmm tl�e owner crf
the Itiverw�od Estates apartment complex. 'I'he propc►sc+d purchase price of $24,15G,89 would
provide fQr �e acquisition c�f appruximately 9,940 squar+�-feet af �earpetual ea�ment az�d 9,9�0
squar�f+c�eet of fi�emporaiy e�mertt along #he west side of Willflw I.�ne, The City A:ttc>rney �as
dra#�ed the easement doc�ment attached ta the resolurion authorizing the purchase �f the
easement.
Budge# Issuesz
fitaf#' recommends t�at the ffi�nndin� for purchase �f the �asement be derived fram the Strcet
Reconstruction Fund.
Easement Acquisitton Resolution
R"�,1 :Si� ty,t+SS •r ��M
y
F d�� r t_rti we�
r ti
s v�
f i� F
,..�-�..-a �T� ti�!� •�:s�+
xa i �:t,t
a••`� t ti .�.�jQ'"�
7iJ t y,
r ir y
L� s.�.� y' 7 4 g�� ..t{ S�
P '.r
��a
,a r l s. j: ��'y
r .3� y� ,�,vh t�
a e j T y
1 �J1 „j_ '1. af a., k
i��' Q r1 r v�
i 1. S a""�-� 1
t s `M �aLf
x ,i, 4
t r'
1
__u..: A t TS al �Q
�S� E N.:
i 'e`
ay 4 q y s
.j
,�i:.�*� '1 a
r�. i '=i- i
f 1 '�"'!m�' �3!'
+,i1
�.i�t ��,�T�
Yv�
}I S
v E 1.
-'.�k y '���i 6�'
+I#f r�' y I F
t�._. w� �iti' L`�
_��i
��r t� c�' 'g
i! ��,`�i .�1
A:�•,
y R.. ..tr, y� 3
tg
a a� K
j u 'C �_�d._�_��
,n' .+f �S'
#::Y i�� �W i
;<z .i" e w �.y� 1t ,ir •fY,
t
j jM��r
INTERSTATE
��4'�
:n� �,dx.�A
a�' A
n'.. F �=y r r^"
�R
.�ec a �l
Member introduce� tMe fotlawing resolution and r�aved its
adoption:
RESOLUT'I(3N NO.
RESt}Lt1TiC}N AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITIt�N OF EAS�MEN1' AI.QNG
WILLOW LANE Nt}RTH
WHER�A.S, cons�uction of new sidewalk alorag the west side c�f Willow Lane betwee�a
65'� Avenue I*lorth as�d Tnterstate Hi�hway I-694 necessitates the a�quisition of a p�rpet�al easement
far sidewalk, utility and drainage purposes and a temporary easern�nt far cc�nstruction purpases
within i�ats l, 4, S, 6 and 7, Block 1, Lyn-River Addition; and
WHEREA, tk�e �ity Atturney has prepared an easement dc�citrnent #'or said perpetual and
temgor�uy ea,sements, a copy crf wluch is attached her�to.
WHEREAS, the City af Bmoklyn Center has ne�otiated a purchaESe price for acquisitian �f
said easement in the amount vf $24,16b.89.
N+(�W, THEREFQRE, BE IT RESOLVED by che Ci�y Couucil of the City af �3rooklyn
Center, Minn�sc�ta that the Ciry Manager is hereby authorized t� purcbas� perpetuai and tempor�y
easeme?nt withi� I.ots l, 5, 6 and 7, Black 1, Lyn-River Addition in ths nam+e of t�e City vf
Broc�kl}m Cen#er fflr the purchase price of $24,16b.89,
Mav 14, 2007
Date Mayor
AT'�EST;
�ity Clerk
The rnc�#ion #'tar the adoption of the fore�oing resolution w� duly sect�nde� by member
and npo� vote bein� t.aken t�aeareun, the following voted in favor therec�f
aaad the following voted a' t the same:
whereurpoa� saud resol�tion was declar�i duly passed and ado�ated.
I
Box 198
Kennedy �rav�n, Chartered Torreps
EASEMENTS
THIS T�+TSTRI�IN[EI�IT is made by Riverwaad E;states, L,LC, timited liabi�ity �ompany
organiz�i under the lavvs t�f the State of Minnesota� +�ra�atc�r, in favc�r c�f the City of Brooklyn
Center, a Minne.sota mun�ic�pal cc�rp4ration, Grantee.
Recitals
A. Grantc�r i� the fee owner of the following descri6ed praperty in H�nnepin Cauniy,
I�intl+esOta (th� "Pr+aperty"}:
I�ots 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7, Block l, Ly�a-River Addition
B, C�rrantor desir�s tc� �rant to the Grantee easements, accQrdz'ng to the terms and contlitions
cc�ntained her�in,
Terms af Easements
l. Grant of Easements. �ur gaod and val�uable cvnsideration, receipt of which is
win ea�em�nts:
acknowle�ri�i by Gran#or, Crraiator �rants and conveys to t�� Gr�uttee the fcallo
I
A�tual, non-exclusive ea,sement for sidewalk, utility and drainage purposes av�r,
unde�, acr+oss and through t�ae easterly 10 feet af the Prflperty.
A ternporary easement for cc�nsUvetion purposes ov�r, under, acrsss and thro�agh the
westerly 10 feet �f the easterly 20 feet of the Propert�+.
Said tempc�tary eas�meni expires on December 31, 2�07,
2. Sct��ne of Easements T'he perpetual sidewatk, utility and drainage easement granted
herein includes �e rig�t of the Grantee, its contractors, agents, and �mplayees to enter the
34423(1vd �BitAR29l-t0
pr�mises ai atl reasanable tim�� far the purpose af lc�catin�, constructing, reconstructing
operating, maintaining, inspe�t`tng, a.ltering and repainng within the descr�6ed easem�nt area
storm sewer, sanit�ty sewer and water facitities, ground surface draina�,e ways and sidewalk.
The temporary easement inciudes the right of t�e Grantee, its eontractors, agents, and
�mplflyees to enter �pc�n said pr�mises at all reasonabt� times for the purpases of canstruction,
gz�ading, sloping, and r�storation purposes, and all purposes ancillary thereto, together v�ith the
ri�ht tv remave treees, sh�ubs c�r other vegetation in the easemeni area, �s well as the right to
d�eposit earthen materiats within the easernent azea ar�d to mave, store, and rernav� equipment
and supplies, and to perfQrm any otl�er work necessary and incident tt� the projeci.
The easernents granted herein also include the right to cut, trirn, ar remove frc�m the
easemen# areas tre�s, shrubs, ar c�ther ve�etation as in the Gran�ee's ,judgment �xnre�onably
interfer� wiih the �aseir�ent vr facilities of the Grantee, its successors �r assigns,
3. W�rraz�tv of Title. The Grantor warrants it is the c�wner of ihe Prcc>per�y and has the right,
title artd capacity to canvey ta the Grantee the easement herein.
4. Environmental lt�at#�rs, "The Grantee shall nat be responsibie fc�r any costs, �xpenses,
damag�s, demands, obligations, inciuding penalties ar�d reasonabte attorney's fees� or Ic�sses
resuIting frc�m any cl�izns, ac�ions, suits or proceedin�s based upon a releas� or threat of release
4f any hazudous substances, pc�llutants, or contaminants which may hav� exisEed an, or which
relate tt�, #�e easement area or Property prior to the date of t�ais in�strument.
.5. l3india�� Effect. The terms and conditions of this instrunn�nt shalt run with the land a�d
b� bindin� on tbe Granior, its successors and assigns.
STATE DEE� TAX I7tJE HEREUN. NONE
I�ated ihis day of 2007,
Riverwoad Estate,�s, �.LC
By
Its
sy
Its
�o���� cs� sa,���-�o
SfiA'TE OF MI]N1�fESt)TA
SS.
COUNTY t�F
T'he foregaing instrument was acknowtedged l�efore rne t,�is day of
�UO'I by and the
and af Riverwaod Estates, LLC, a
�imiter� liability company or�anized under the laws of the State of Mi�esota, an behaif af the
limited liability cc�mpany, G�rantc�r.
Notazy Pubtic
NC1TA.�tY �TA�viP 4R SEAL
THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY:
Kennedy Graven, Ghartered
Suite 470
200 South Sixth Street
Minneapc��is, NIl�T 55402
309230v1 CBRBR29i-10
Box ]98
Kennedy Grav+e�, Charterai 'Ta�rrens
�ONSEI�iT AND JOINDER BY M4RTGAGEE
FANI'+TIE I�AE, a corporation, holder af a martgage t�n tlie pra�erky
which is described as fallows:
Gots l� 5 6 and Block 1 L -River Addition
i 4
her�by c.�►nsents and joins in the Easement dated 20(}7, filed
2�?U7 in the office flf the Her�rsepin County Registrar of' `Titles as Dacurr��t No.
so as tc� subject and subordinate the undersggned's int�rest to said �asement.
I?a#esl;
FANNIE MAE
By:
Its:
By:
Its:
30923t9v1 CBR SR291-10
STATE UF ��+�`NESOTA
SS.
COUN�Y t�F
The foregain,g instrument was acknowied�ed before me this day of
2407 by artd the
and c�f �`ANf�1IE 1ViAE, a corpora,�ian organized
under �he laws of the an behalFofthe corporation.
Notary Public
NOfiAR� STAMP C,l�t �EAL
THIS INSTRI�fMENT DRAFTE� BY:
I�ennedy +Graven, Chartered
Suite �#7U LT,S. �ank Plaza
20U Soutt� Sixtt� Stre�t
Minnea}�olis 1V[I�T 55402
�asn,�a ce�auz��-to
.�r
v
w
n
4
E.
f
e,
<<N :n
,m
..i
4
��a w
r
F
f
2
4
r,
3
,..,e,.
<z
y
.i
G
Er
L
f
l
n
I
J Z
k
n
j
f
,.i
z
:..s
t
F
�x�
'�4
F
a; r
i
a t<
a.
F
.r
..�^v.� k^
.:g:
r
s, ,.,a
v.s
t
4,
c ,:c
S y
1
l
,.i
r r:
o i
T
t.
y
'.i::
::b
ti
ti
q
.y. i i ....c:>
tTn•.
.:i
m :'t:i.
i .''i v
.��i
.p.
x.i
z
2
..�1
rc;
�:.,i.
„i'
9
u
<t
'v
a"'
�4 'x::
:4 ,i`
s :'i.
..i
X .i
�.:y
v m::
w
`y y
a.
f•:'
Y Y
t 'j`
I
.:i;
a
'G:: t.:
�i�:
;::i
.;,�i
r
a� j
.t::::, .:.n:::
C
Y
F
E
i
.i
Y
i:.
i,•,, .i
F.
r
wt.
k
GOUNCIL ITEM MEM4RANUUI4�I
TO: Ca� Bo�ey, City Manager
FROM: I}aniel .icrrdet, Directar of Fiscal Support Services
ItATE: 7 t+viay 2t�07
�a�7TBi�ECT: I�rtification of Assessment
59{}� Emerson Avenue North
Recomm�ndation: It is recamnnend� that the City Council adapt resolutio�t rescir�ding the
assecsment of unpaid trtilities against the ProP�rty located at 59Q3 Emerson Avenue North in ihe
amount of 267.U8,
Bsckgrunnd; �n 12 March 2Q07 the City Council adopced a resolution certify'rng assessments of
unp�id utility charges against a number of properties in the City including 2b7.08 against th�
praperty at 5903 Emerson Avenue North. The ov►mer, Beatr��ce Williams, declared bankruptcy an
11 Janu,ary 2007. Normaliy, an account that is subjec# tc� ban�C.ruptcy prc�eedings is not certified
be�ause tl�e +Gity car►�ot legally collcct assessments that we€+� not certi�iad by the date af
d�laration. However, Gity st�tffrnisse.ci this connection and Ms, Williams' accauni was includesi
vvith the certification praceedings. Subsequcntly, on 19 April 2007, the City received a discharge
of debt nc�tice for Iv1s. Willia�ns. Upon discovering the errc�r in ttre assess�nent cerEificativn to her
pmperty staf'f began the process of rescinding the impro�r assessment. In order for the process
to b� comp�eted, #he �ity council must adopt a rosolution rescindin� #he cc�tification ofthe
�snaent it adapte�ci by res�lu#ion c�n 12 March 2007. 'I'!�e attached resoiution, if �dopted,
perform� that function.
Sudg+e# Lsaues;
The Utility En#erpri� Funds will have to write off 2b'7.Q8 i� un�llectible utili#� bil# d+e#�t.
CI"7`Y C1F :�k....�{I.YN C�"i'�It 0�105i�b07 PJIt#f5 59
CURRCBR'T-RB�O1tT BY ACC'T C tJ R R l� N T C 8 R T I P� C�1 `I' I O t�1 R S F O R T R�QLi�9TC1R :��f7N
fiAlt 1117DR �'ILZTY ADMIBt A38F�SS CERTTl�'IED
ACC'T' NUM8�R/PID 5$RVICTsI$ILLINC'� i�AiYl$ �ie A7�3R8SS C}WN R�S CtOLL TYP$ AMKYLlNT CfIA1tt3E AMCtL1I�T 2HT T A!�[O[13�fi
A�DT� STl1T'US FLAt3
�5fi �I LI,.�I7 CER�' t�Rt�3'P
4-08853-Of�fl�-3-0'�- �ARD�AIAS MI4'HAEL Y Y Y S 1Z4.3�I .4Q 1Z4.34 .tltlQQO 1��.34
01118:t1�3C1t18�.
�95"�5 AC 5�Z9 N'T AYE N
�.Lf+��/ana� a �r�oo�.n�r c�sa� ru+r s�aao-�sa�
�-oe$a�•000Wa-a3- r��szn�rrr �a �r r� s 3ax.s� .00 aaa.s� .aoo�a 2ZZ.59
tt21182123{iti54
896�0 AC 60t}U NT A11� �T
111t1i130fl6 BROOKi,YN C�+17'1:R MN 5543Cl-��30
7CIOY�TC3 VIKlCI 1l N Y B
3395 RIt'8 8Tt28�'3` #145
RQ38VII.L� MN 551i3-3720
4-Q888'7-000-3-03- HAYBS Q�ftI51'Y Y Y Y S 310.30 ,0� 310.3p .00Q00 310.30
3611911330017
89395 AC 1112 621�D AV8 N
Il/O1/2006 4 HROOlCZ,Yi�1 C�N'�ER M�l 55�t30-2109
A-08911-000-3-OZ- RSSID�NT N Y D S 26?.08 .00 267.08 .00000 267.08
0111811210023
89955 AC 5903 �R�N A�/S N
7.1j01/ZOQ6 4 SROOR.Ytd CSNTSR 1�i 55430
WILLIAMS S6ATRICE Y Y Y H
941I1 CEiERRYiipO�D lUVE N
BR�ICI.YN PARJ!C i�gJ 55493-1561
i-08�15-000-9-0�- 88t�iJl4MiN 'T'CtAZAt�tA Y'Y Y 5 373,55 .0� 2'7:l� ,�U
t1I12821�3Q0'�3
89575 AC 58�3 AVE N
11/t11/20�6 4 HRf30iCLYN I+QJ 55430-�6�fl
4-089�9-Op0-5=03- B+CINII,I,A MARINA 7C Y Y S Z71.84 .QO 271.8# .OQOOt! 271.84
�111�Z1�30fl29
89��5 AC 5743 A�IE N
��I��iz�os ��trx��,n�t r� s���u-zsss
�-tl8928-000-4-03- THOMPSQN �iAY'1�1'B Y Y Y S 3�5.63 .Q4 325.63 .QQp00 325.63
O111��i2300�8
89255 AC 5'7�2 Q� AVF 1B
11�01/�006 4 BRtX31CLYtJ C MN 5543q-�557
9-0893D-004-0-OS- ��Ni? AC�JSTIN Y Y Y S 2SB.34 .QO 258.34 .QQ000 Z58.34 I I
t}i11831230C167
�89550 AC 5730 �RSOI+1 AVL td
a.�.lo1lzoos �xooxLn� ��s�o-a�s�
Member introduced the fvilowin� res�c�iution �nd
m�ved i#s adoption;
RES(�I.UTION N4.
RESC}LUTi41�I RESCINDING ASSESSi�tEN'T C}F UNPAID UTILITIES TC15903
EMERS4hi AV�NI.�E NORTH
WHEREAS, the City Council certified assessment af unpaid utilities to the
Hennepin County Assessnr t�n 12 Maanch 20Q7; and
WHEREAS, the pro�rty owned by Beatrice Williams at 5�03 Emerson Avenue
Norih was o� the list o#'prt�perties with unpaid utilities; and
V✓HEREAS, the t7wner, Ms. Williams, had filed a petiti4n fc�r ba�nlssuptcy
prute�#aic�n prior to the actual certification of tk�ese unpaid utiiities; and
'W�REAS, subsequent to that �tition, Ms, Willia�ms was granted disctxaarge of
debts by the District Gourt,
NQW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESQLVED by the City Council Qf �e City of
Broakiyn Center that the assessment Qf unp�id utilities to the property at S9Q3 Emers�rn Avenue
Narth certified c�n 12 March 200� in the amount of 267.Q8 be and hereby is rescinded.
Mav 14. 2007
Date Mayor
ATTEST;
City Clerk
Tiie mc►tion for the ac�option of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by memb�er
and upon vate �in� #aken t�erec�n, the following voted in favor thereaf
and the following voted agaianst the same:
rhrhereupon said resc�iution was decla;zz�d duly passed and adopted.
h
v
s
r
hE
f
l
x
i
i,
y
f
k
v
k t
..':t
I
f
y
r
r
7 t
F
..w`�
..s. .p e
b
a
p
r
i. c.
K
i.,
:t
rz
rv
.i.:
l
.'r
f
l
i.>
Y
II ��1R
.i Y���� i
T
x
t
s 5
s
i.
x
t. i
i. s�v�
i a
i
L
s'
i
3
.;N
6„
i:
..S '.:i
l
S
i:,
�i E
w
r
s x
n;
.:�:t
,z 5
r
i w
.c
s
a
r
r
4
E
i i
l i
x i
rg
.v .s .z::
y
:t
t
.,x
r
x x.
i
.i
COUNCIL ITEM MEM()�tA1�TDUM
TO: Curt Bog,�ey, City Ma�ager
�"RQM: D�niellorde#,1Jirectar of Fiscal Suppart Searvices
DA'�'E: '7 May 2007
SUB3ECT: Central Garage Fund Budget Amendment
Recommend�ti�n: Ik is requested th�t the Gity Gouncit adopt a resvlution amending the 2U07
budget for the Central Crsrage Fund allowing for the repiaeement of an unsafe vehicle with a new
cargo van fcar the iiquc►r vperati+ans.
Backgrnuad; The current vehictc used by liquor store operations for haufing mecchaadise
betw�en stc�res, a 1�91 Chevralet minivan, has a cracked frame. It is unsafe ta vperate. The cast
of repairs tc� ttae vet�icie outweighs th� v�lue af tho vehicle at present. It is re�o�nmended that tk►e
minivan t� replaced with a new, Ford E2S0 cargo van urtder the state contract, �vhich is avsi�abic
until 15 May 2007. Total cost af the new van wilt be 16, I29.85. �`unding wcruld came ft€�m
eacisting reserves c�rried by the Central Garage Fund for the existing I991 van. Tt�e new cargo
van will have an expect�d useful life of 10 years.
Bndget Issae�: First, the Central Garage Fuz�d Capital Qutlay tine i�ecm would h�.ve tc� be
incr�as�d by 16,134, The r�servcs in the Central Gar�ge Fund carry a cotal of 21,941 for
replacement of the liquor c�peraCions vehicle. The cast of thc �ew uan would be taken fr�mm that
reserve, '�'he �remainin� bal�r►ce of S,$ I 1 would be merged into the unreserved funds of tt�e
Central Gara�� for future use.
Second, the Fixed Charg�s line item in the Liquor Qperatians Fund fQr stcrre 1 would have to be
incr�d by 846.46 for six m€�nths of charge backs for w� of t#�e new van, assuming delivery
late in June of 2407.
p����� This ordt�r number MUST
{�j"j'"� ��,{)(��r� ��i��+',R $PPear �rn yaur ir►voice. O
st,t��� cr� Qa�w�y N
�yn ceriter, Minnesota s543U CHAR4�E 1`�
'I"ELEPHdNE {763} 569-33tN3 BUSihIESS UP117 I 48JECT COQE SUBLEd(3ER AMQUN7
TO: ,,,,,,,,��lt ��,1„�,.,,`l.,�I'
l .._..ld�.:�
��1�.-.,._.�'�` 3`��' 33 3� 1 I
76 3-�� �l� 3 3
CIUANTITY UW#T DESCA1PTiON I PR10E P�R TGTIIL
I I ',�e� I I I
I I ,sr.�r.�, I I
I 1 .�-,�x.s- �.s-a� I I
I I 1
x�,,f i� I� I
I I 1
J I ,.r�'� ,t3�..�.,� I 3 d I :�1
.1 r
I o,�r�! s� I.�;�.� f� I
I I 1
I l,�ti r'-c� I,�c„� I I
I I I I
I S'�•�- 7"-r' Gl'o r"/S� I�`�. I
,.S'u� �a 7'��/ Il.s,�y,�l�� I I
I�r T� a&'►-��� r/ I I
I I r� ��s� 1 I
I I I I I I
I I I I
I i
I I
I I W�.._. W._�..
I i Purpcsss of C4rder i/�' +.T �,I'�- t3 A-�j'i+t1,�!" ��?r Y t�iC�r�'✓ �r
P
�L�'�+ �j G'A�v G,` 1 t.
as ardered on 20 Signed
PUAGHA81t+9[i A{i�NT
Member introduced the fc��lowin,� resalution and
moved its adaption:
RESC}LUTION NO,
RESfJLUTI(3]N A1��ENDING 2007 BUDGETS Ft�R CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
ANT} LIQU(JR STC3RE 1 TO ENABLE PURCHASE t3F A CARGO VAN
WHER.�AS, t�he current vehicle used by th� �iqu�r stvres far transporting
merchandise between stares has a cracked frame and is wc�safe t€� operate, and
WHEREAS, a r�serve has been acct�mmulaied for r��alacement ,�f ihe van in the
amount of 2l, 941, and
WHEREAS, the cc�st nf a replacement van for liquor c��er�ons is $16,129.$5; and
��HEREAS, it would t� appmpriate to amend the bur�gets for the Cen�ral Garage
Fund and Liqucrr Fund to facilitate this purchase.
NC3W, TH�:REF�}RE, BE IT RESOLVEI} by the City Council of the City of
Braoklyn Center that the Gentral Crarage Fund line item for capital pw�hases (49951-6554) be
increased by l 6,13U to allow far purchase of a Ford E2�0 cargo van for liquar operatioa�s and tihat
the Fixed C�arges in Liquor Store 1(496 1 1-6462) be increased for 2Q07 by 846 to allow for the
fixed charge increase resulting from putting the new van into service.
M�v 14, 2UG17
i�st� Mayar
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The mc�tion for the adoption af the fQregoing resolution was duly secanded by member
and upon voie being taken thereon, the following voted in favor therec>f:
and the �allc�wing voted agair�st the same:
whereupon said resalution was declared duly passed and adopte{d.
i i. �3
im
..y. y
k"
P
d
i.
L
n
t ..i:: j
r
f
r
..i
:i
s::
f
n`
a
a
w
f x
.v�
i
.:ta
u
s
i
i
r
w�.::
i
t
ic
t
�i
.E;
,s F.:
<r
.i
g n:
y
y
K.
..:s q
::�1
1
i a:
J, I y. i.
I 1
i 3
4 +�t i�. i�.� +��Y��11�� ?4�������� �IR �b�Fr �se�'��
��I��i�I 1 �����A1�.,� ��TF �7'(
>n L:�
i
�i
n
v i
2
ii.
c
`e
i..�
v
z
v z'
G
t
:'J
X
i:� C
i.
::e
l
r i 'i.
.i
.'i
.e., .''F
i .i
i
.:i
�,'r
�o
•,x
.E:
i
f
I
Si t i:
.R: n
J
3
i
I
I
r
:i� a .i`.
Y
2. i��
'i:
...:i
a
,,.'"'r..
a`
i: i: 'i�
i
r.
f
,...r�..
::4
y
r,
:e.�'..
.'e.<"
C£�UNCIL ITEM MEMORAN�}UM
T'fl: City Council
Fltt)M: Curt Bogacrey, City
DATE: May 8, 2047
SUBJECT: Rcsolution suthorizing Settlements with MCES and Metru Tra�it
R.ecommendatiun:
I recommend a�doption af the s�xbject resolution authori�ing �ttlement of �laims with
Metropalitan Cauncil Environmental Services (MCES) division in the amc�unt of
��8{�,465 anci tv acceP� i�Y�ent from Metra Transit in the amaunt c�f $133,4��
Backgrnund:
MCES
In Janusiy uf 2QU7 #he Gity Gouncil met in executive session to di�cuss pot�eential
li�igatiau with regard �o a claim made by the MCES that the City of Brooktyn Center
owed in excess of $653,867,4� far under-billed discharges intc� t�ae Sanitary S�wear
�ystem fro� t�►e Joslyn Site.
The facts are that since the mid 199U's when the Joslyn Site redevelopment began
the cast of °treatment �f c�ntaminated ground water flowing ficam the site was paid for by
thc City of Minneapolis. This #low should have been deducted from the Ciiy c�f
�+�inn�lis aceount and billed to Bmoklyn Center. Unfomuxx�tely, due to a variety of
reparting and tracki�g errors thns billing did not occcwr. In the m�ntime Brc�Cl.yn Center
establish+e� se�ver charges and collected payments fi�om custc�rners on the biilin�
re+ceived r��su�ting in customer bills that were lower tha� they othe�wise wcruld be+�n, 'We
estima#e that the �vatue Qf these under-billings going back to �the beginnin� peric>d wuuld
exc.�ed �1,fl00,{�}0,
Due to a variety +af factors inclu�iing a statute of limitations, pmvisic�n the MCES haGs
to sei�le its claim for 5653,867.48. This rep�sents the tast si� y+�ars of unbilled
payments c�e. Furk�erm+are they have agreed that the City can malce this payment
mcanthly Qv�r the next six years without interest.
Alterna�veiy, the MCES has agreed to accept a lwng surn payni�nt €�f S58tJ,�bS. T�iis is
the �et present value af the assumed payments made aver six ye�s di�unte�d at 4°fo.
Previously, sta��ad erraneously computed the lump sum payment at �d1,723. Staffhas
discuss�l this matter with �CES staff and we agree that the �arrect lurng swn amount
sl�aulci t�e $580,465.
MET'RO T`RAl'�SIT
Not Iong afterr the la�tt City Council discussion of tius matter staff broug�t to my atteriti�n
the fa# that we recently discaver� that the Me�a Transit Ruter Garage on Shingle Creeic
=Parkway has l�en dischar�ing storm w�ter into the City sanitary sewer system since 199�
without a pernut and wi�iout making the appropna�e payment ta the City Sewer Fund.
Having discvveretl this infr�rniarion we decided �t it was impvz�nt tv resolve both
issues simultan�usly, if ssible.
The results af our review fownd t�hat since t 992 the vQlume of storm water treat�ed h�s a
no�unal billing value af $133,499.21. While an arg,ument ca�ild b� miacie that the Statu�te
af limitatian shauld prevent the City from collecting more than six years of payments, the
Metro Transit officiats have to make a full payment af $133,499. {In fact a check
in tt�is ainount l�as �n received} Certainly, we cc�u�d make an a�rgument f€�r interest
wlaich we estinaate would eqtial �45,75Q.?b on the fuli amQUnt but since MCES is willing
to forgo interest on the amaunt we owe and we wil� r�ceive payments bey4nd the six yeaz
s�#atute of �imitation�, ac,�eptazice of the nominal payment of I 33,499.21 seems fair.
Fiscsi Issues;
The City Cauncil with the adoption of the 2007 budget e�nmarked �461,723 af the Loca1
Govemment Aid (LGA) tu l� set aside in the Sanit�ary �ewer Fund to caver this subject
contingen�y. With the $I33,499.21 payment from Me�ro Transit, the sewer fund will
have $59�,222,2I o�miscellaneQUS r�venue available tu cover the �580,465 lump s�m
clai�n from MCES without affecting utility rates.
Altemativety The City could elect to pay $653,867.0� aver six years w�thou# interest, If
this approach is selected it is reasonabie to assume ihat w� will be able to earn at least �F°lu
on vur inv�nent� c�ver six y+ears suggesting that that City cpuld �n�fit form pa3'#�8
over time. flf caurs�, a fowr �rcent return on inv+estment is n�t guarant�ed.
G: Dan Jordet
IVlember introduced �hhe foilawing resolutit�n
and mc�ved i#s adc�pt��n:
RES{?LUTION NO.
RESC►LUTItJN AUTHORIZING �ETTLEM�NT� �VITH THE
I��1:1`it�OPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRt3N�NTAL SERVICES {MCE�)
I7NI�ION A1�iU METRO TRANSIT DIVISI(JN t��' Tt-�E Iv�TRt?POLIT'Al�
C()UNCIL �tJR SA,I�iITARY SEWER SERVICE� R:�J�3EREI�
WHEREA�, the Sazutary Sewer Fund for #he City of Brooklyn Center was nut
billed for dischar�es from the Jcrsiyn Redevelopment Site for a period af at �e,a�t six ye�rs; and
WHEREAS, MCES has offer� to accept a lurnp sum payment €�f �580,465 as
full and camplete payment for previously unbill� service reader�d; and
VfTHEREAS, the Metro Transit Ruter Garage has been discharg� storm vvater
intQ the Ca o� Brookl Center sanitary sewer system since I9�2 without a permit or without
�Y Y�
P�3'��nt for services rendered; and
VfJH�REAS, all parties wish to resolve matters ofnon-payment on am�cable
and fair basis.
the Ci Counci� of the Ci of
NUW, 7"HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYEI) by tY �YY
Broaklyn Center, Minflesota, that the City Manager is authoriz�ed tc> mrake a payment $580,465 as
a lump sum settle�ent to the �VICES far unbilled Joslyn Site discharges ar�d to a�cept a payment
of �133,499.21 from Metro Trainsit as full and complet� payment far unbilled services rensl�red
t� th►� R�ter C'iarage site.
�viav 14.2t�4?
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motian for #he aci�pti�n of the faregoing resolution was duly seconded by rnember
and u�n voUe being taken there+�n, the followin� voted in favc�r thereof:
and the follawing vc�ted against ti�e same:
whereupon said resolution was declaGred duly passed ar�d adopteci.
ii i
Mary t3. Tie�jen
470 US Bank Ptara
xt#� sauth s;xd► sa�eet
Micsneapolis MN 55402
a�it
i (bi2} 337-92"�? teleptwae
(612} 337-9314 fax
mtiet.i�C�Gn�Y-8��en.cam
�n:l/www_kennedv-ceraven.co,p�
+CI�ARTEi�.ED
MEMQRANDUM
To. Braoklyn C�nier City Cauncil
Curt Bc�gau�ey, City Manager
Baniel Jordet, Directc�r ot Fiscal and Support Ser.vices
From: Mazy I3. Tiet�en, Attorney
Charlie L. LeFevere, City Attarney
Date; l�Tovember 20, 2U06
Re: ATutice r�f Undet Billin� by Metropolitan Cvuncil Envimnmental S�ces (MCES)
In#rodnctian
MCES recent�y notified ihe City of Bra�klyn Cent�r ("Cit� that it has under-billed the
Ci�y for mu�ucipal wastewater charges related to th� .iaslyn Industrial Site, which is an
w�metered location near the Ci�y of Minn�apolis border. (As a r�sult, �CES over-bilted
the City af Minnes�polis.j MCES has acknowledged th�t any cl�im for recovering
under��yments frorn the City wauld b� limited to six years, based on the statute of
limi�atians in �innesota Statutes, s�ction 541.05. A tetter frc�m MC�S dated Octaber 23,
20t}6, sta�s th�t based on a"flow conection" for the past six years, the City vw�s MCES
Sf�3,$67.08. MGES �a:s offe�red to waive interest on the repayrnent throu� 20U6, and to
a�low the City to pay MCES 4ver a six-year periad with an interest rate of 4%.
'You have asked us to review the background infurnnation and prov�de an oginion
regardin� the City's obligation ta pay the under-l�ill� az�c�unt to MGES. Fir�t, I will
briefly sumtnarize the factual background and then �ive you ou� analysis and
recornrnendaticsns regard`xn� any potential legal claims or issues.
Fs+e#n�i Backgro�nd
Most MGES charges t� cities are b�aserl on a flow detern�in� by sewer flow meters at city
bau�dari�s, Howev�r, tbere aze a number of cases in which, fc�r var%�us reas4ns, bxtls aze
based an estimated flows be�ause the flaws are either not metered, or are nat met� at a
city bou.ndaty.
301i22v1 MA"1 E31t291 ZT6 1
In thi� c,ase, an industrial user, Joslyn, Pumped water frvm growxd wa�r eontatninati�n
remediation wells intv tt�e sa�itary sewer system under an industriai p+ernut from the
MCES. Tlxe water from Joslyn was pumped into the system at a ica�ation �hat vvas not
metered dowr�.stream until it passed through a Minneap+�lis meter. MCES shauld Ixave
suirtracted the Joslyn sewage flow from the Mi�uxeapolis meter re�iing and billed th�
City. However, this did not happen and MCES billed Minneapotis for this flow for all of
these years.
Me�while, the City was callecting sewer charges from Joslyn along with all other city
sa�i#ary sewer users, The City set its sanitary sewer rates in an amc�unt sufficient to cover
MCES char�es. (Theref4re, the cidzens who lived in Brookiyn CerYter dwring those six
�+eazs may fi�ve had somewhat lower s�wer bills tt�an they wou�d have atherwise had.}
Al#hough the Joslyn flow was not sepazately metered by� MCES, w� knc�w what the flt�w
was l�e+cause 3oslyn reports gallc�ns pumped inta the systern and capies the City on that
repc�rt.
For each of the past several years, the City filled c�ut an+d submitted to MCES an M�ES
fon�a called "swvey af sewer user data." It appears that the city employee who completed
the surv�y fonm durir�g the relevant years accurately reported Joslyn's total flt�w, but did
not list J�aslyn as an wwn�-metered site in the relevant sectic�n of th+� swrv�y farm. MCES
also bad infc�rmation, not only from the same survey fc�rm, but frc�m many other sc�urces
as well, that should have put it on notice of the Jaslyn situatisan.
'The City �ubmitted a survey fQrm to A�GES in 3anuary 20Q6 �for sewer use in 2445) that
did list Jvslyn as a� un-metered site. That is how the error was evenh�tly identified.
An�lvsi�
T'he following legal issues and defenses may be relevant if this becames a disputed claim.
l, Statute of Limitaations. �'irsr�t, the MCES has cc>:t�ectly acknawledg+� that i#s
r+e�overy would limited to the past six years based on �u�ne�ta Statutes, s�ction
541.OS. Under this sec#ion, actions u�n a contrac# or u�on a liability createci by st�tute
�must be commenced wiihin siac years. The cc�urts hav� ct�aracterized wr►paid utili#y
charges both ss �ntractual and in the nature of unpaid real est�►te t�ces, dependent upon
the spe�ific �cir�umstances. In either instance, the six-y�az statute of limitations applies,
2. �uitable Esto�eI. The Gity may have a legal �r�ume�t that MCES i� equitably
estopped from recovering the underpayrnents frc�m the City. `°F.quitable estoppel is
essentially a tl��ry upon which a party asserts that it relied on the acts or om�ssit�t�s of
�nQther a�nd "zt would be inequitabte to "un-dd' the rights which the relyin8 P�Y �9�
as a result. Mwucipal corporatic�ns are afforded extra prote�tic�n agaGic�rst estoppei: A
See. e.g.. Cas�trde Motor NoteL Inc. v. City of fluluth, 348 N.S�V.2d 84 (Minn. I984}; Gity of �ast Gra�rd
�F'vrkk� v. Lurck, 9� Adit�n. 3'73, l�'T 1V. W. 393 (190G).
Rice �Strect VFiY v. Cxty afS�.1"uul, 452 N.W.2d 503, 508 (Minn. Ct, App. �9'90),
301 E22v1 M�7' 8R291 276
I
mt�nicigality is estopped only if it act� wrongfufly. Nanaction �eneraUy is insuf�icient
as a basis for estoppei aygains� a municipal corporation.� H4wever, estappe� is appragriate
where a party demonstrates th�at the municipality, thmugh Ianguage ar conduct, indueed
the party to rely, in goc�d faith, on this language ar cunduct to his in,}ury, detrim�nt ar
prejudice.
Because M+CES is a governmental entaty, the City vvould f�rst hav� to shnw, in an
estoppel claim, that MCES acted wrongfully. The alieg�sily wrangfiil cc�nduct in this
case is MCES's failure to properiy account for Joslyn's �ischar�e into the MCES
di�pasal system and bili the respective local units of government accordingly. Mare
s�ecifically, the MCE� fail�ed to subtract the Jaslyn sewag,e flow firom ti�e Minneapoiis
meter �adir�g and bill Brovklyn Center. Instead, MCES inccrrrectty billed the city of
��inn�apolis, J�rsyln is pumping water into the sar�itary sewer system under �n industriai
perinit issu�d bv M+CES. P�u°ssuar►t to its permit and the Was�Ee Discharge itul�s far the
M+etra�litan Disp�sal System, Joslyn is required pravide periodic rept�rts to MCES
that describe t�e �ase and volume of wastewater dis�barg�d to public sewers.
Thus, MCES had {or st�o�d b�ave had) first-b�and inforrnatiaa� �g�rd�cg the amount of
flow attributable to Joslyn, but., nevertheless, submitted incon�ect b�lls to the City. 'This
conduct by MCES arguably rises to the level o� affirniative acti4n t4 support an estappel
argurnent.
Assu�ning the City can show "wrongful" conduct by MCES, th� Giiy must ne� show t�t
the MCES in�duce�i the City, through lartguage or conduct, ta rely, in goud faith, un th�
1 e ar conduct tc� the City's detriment or prejudice. Azguab�y, by submitting
incorrec# bills to the Gity, the MCES induced the City to rely on those cal�ulations. As a
resul�, th�e City set a�d collected its sewer charges from residents at a level only in an
amc�unt �ficient to cr�v�r the erroneous MCES bills. Thus, while the City Y�SI{��11�.5
rnay have temporarily benefit+ed from lower sewer bills, the City is prejudiced because it
was not able to sei apprQpriaie rates or collect sufficient rev��ue at the time the services
were provided to its residents. Assuming the MCES claim► i� valid, the City must now
P�Y the di�fer�nce and �up its losses by charging city residents higl�er sewer r�ates.
The City and its residents are specifically prejudiced beca�se many t�f the �esidents who
may �ltimately have to pay the higher sewer rates wi11 nc�t be th� same residents who
t�aefited from the lc�wer bills over the past six years.
As the permit issuc�r and the entity with first-hand %nformatian frc�rn Joslyn,lV,t�CES was in
the best positic�n to �ccount for 3osiyn's flow vatum�s and ter prop�rly bill the affecteci
lc�cal �overnrnents, Tts failur� to do sa may be considez�d affirmative acti4n, praviding a
t�sis fc�r the City to assert estc�p�el.
3. Laches. 1'he �ity cc�uld also assert a defense of "taches" in this sitt�a�on, 'The
Pur�ose of l�ch�es is to prev�nt ane who h�s not asserfi�d a lcaiown right from recvv�rin� at
Ridgewoc�d l?ev. Co. v. State, 29� N. W.2d 28$, 292 {Minn. 198U).
Race Street YFW, 4S2 N, W 3d at SQ8.
S /L� {Gtttll� �It,�,�8W00+d SJlp7'Q�.
�ot�z�v� nu�rsr��-2�� 3
the +�xpen�se vf ane wha has been prejudiced by the detay. The essential elernent �f
laches i� that the p�rty asserting it has been prejudiced by the delay.
1'he Gity has a�aod argument that both it and its residents will be prejudiced by MCES's
d,�t� in uestin th,at the Ci r�imburse it for services for which MCES should have
Y �Y
known it was uader-billin� t�e City. Municipalities gcr thrcrugh a pain-st��lcing pracess to
create a� annnual bud espe�cially naw, when funds are far firam pientifiil, Neeclless ta
�y, the City dc�es not h�ve an wirestriet� +cash reserve in an amount t2�at waulci cctver
such un�cp�ected costs� 4ver the last six years, the City set its sewer rates at an amount to
cover the MCES casts. The City does not set sewer rates with the gval af tnaking a
profit. Thus, the cash representing the City L4 S8Y1f1�S" flVE�'T �lt' IBSt SIX �FW"dr5 1S t10�
sittin� in a pot som�where in City Hall. In order ta malce the payments request� bY
MCES over six-year periad, the City has deternxined it wcruld need to ra%se its sewear
rates by more than 8°lo each year, therebY S�t�Y I�.ludicing mamy residents wha did uot
b��efit from the artificial IQwer rates in the fi�r�i piacc�. Thus, not only is the City
prejttdiced t�ecause it must en�age in creative budgeting to rec�aup �he pc�tential losses,
but the residents of the Ciry �re prejudiced as well. Brooklyn Center is not a weaithy
City, it is a struggiing �rst-ring suburb, Many residents of the City simgly eannot afford
such increase.d costs, All of these facts support a ct�fense of taches by the Cit�y.
Con�eln�iunlRecammen��tio�
.A►�thaugh MCES has correctly acknawledged that its recovery from th� City wvuld be
limited to six years, its request that the Gity reimburse it for the c�nder-billing l�as same
�a#�nt�al le�al weaknesses. In this type of case, a court wauld b�ance tk�e equities
between t�te parties. There is nv question ihat both th� City and it� resider�ts will be
gr�atly prejudiced by MCES's failure, for many years, ta cctrrectly m�nitor and bili the
�ity fc�r its satutary sewer use.
The oacily re,�on that the billing enar was identifie�i wa� due to the infcarrnation that #1a�e
Gity include� in the MCES survey �Qrm. The s�.rv�y its�clf is clearly nat an official
s+nwce �f infarmation. It is a woluntary "survey" and th� Ci#y's coaperation iz�
completing it is not required by law. (See cover letter from MCES "We thank you in
adva�ace for your continue�l cc�aperation in retumin� the compleited survey.'�. �lsc�,
much of the ir►f�rnzatian provided in the survey is unzelated ta sevver u� eharges. in
lieve a court would find that i� was wr�reasonable far MCES ta
balancin the ui#ies i t�
8 +�q
tiisregarci, or fail to consider, all other relevant informa�on and rely on the survey as an
wer use char es. The Cit
r�#�icial source of infurmatioa to determine the City s se g Y
e that the surve wc�uld be used in such a manner.
had no reasr�n t� belsev
y
sum, the �ity has legal defenses that could make it prnbiematic fc�r MCES tv fuily
re+caver the ret}uested fiu�ds. 'Ft�us, we recornmend that the City ianiti�zte discussions with
MCE� ic� an �ffort ta negotiate a reduced amount.
b Ktapmei+er v. Tagvn ofGenter of Crow Wing, 346 N.W.2d 133, I3? �Menn. 1984).
Aesnick v. Mast, 31 t Mitin. 35b, 249 N.W.2d $78 (1976},
301122vt M17T �R291-276
Page 1 af 1
Curt Boganey
Fram: �}an Jordet
Sent. Manday, January 29, 2Q�071:49 PM
To: Curt 8oganey
Cc: Todd Bk�tstrom
Subjec�: MCES Preser►t lfalue amoun#
Jason Wille� and I have di�cussed the calculation of a present value �ayout fQr the amount
owed to MCES. Lump sum IaaYrnent of an annuity of 653,8fi7,08 would have a present value
of al�ut 580,4fi5 the rouruling difference between JasQn and me was a few txid cer�ts}
right nc�w. Assumption� are a four percent interest rate and a 7z month annuity flaw,
The amount in the set aside fr+�m the eycpected LGA w�ndfal! is $�#61,y23 �eavir�g 118,742 to
ctame �om the �an�ry Sewer Fund.
et me knaw �f you have addi�on�l q�stions.
oaniei �t
Dir�dot of Rscai Suppt>rt Servioe.s
C�ty o# Brooklyn Center
530f Shirtg� Cr�k �arkway
Brool�yrn Center, Min�nesot� 55430
(763) 564-3�45
2/2l2007
�`ity a►f ��r�oklyn Center
A Millennium Community
May 2, 2t}0?
Mr. Eriwit� I?. Fetrie
Dir�ctor of Finance
ivi� "�'r�nsit
Sb0 sixth Avenue North
h+linn�tis, NIl'� 55411-439$
Dear Mr. Petrie;
Per our tetephone conv�rsatian 4�a this date, I have enclosed a spreadsheet illustz�t.ting Lhe method hy
which we have calculated the payments due the City of BroQklyn Center far storm water discharge %nto
the Ci�+ ��nitary ��wer System. In vxew of the mitigating circw�st�zc� and tQ avoid f�er colleetion
efforts, I vvill recomraend to tlae k3�raaklyn Cex�ter City Cou�cil that we accept payment of $133.499.21
as futl a�nGd final paymnent fvr this liab�I�ty.
This matter will be brought befare the Bxooklyr► Center Gity Council for cansideratia�a at its ne� regular
Council meeting vn May 14, 2007.
Sincerely,
Cornelius L. Bc��aney
City Manager
Enclasure
C: Chazlie LeF�v�re, City Attomey
Dan Jordet, Director ef Fisc�al and 5upport Services
Todd Blomstrom, Pubiic W€�rks Director/City En�uaeer
6301 S3ungle Creek Parkway Recrecxtivn and Community �er�ter Ph��e TDD IVumher
�rooklyra Genter, MN 5543Q-�X 99 (763) 56�-3�tU(1
C�ty Flatt T➢Tl Nurreber (7G,3) 5G9-33t10 FAX' {T63) 569-34�34
FAX (763} 569-3494
wwu�,city�jbr�aoklyrr.center,vrg
Pumpage frorr� Gmundws�er VY�tls
Ruter Garage in Broc�klyn C�anter
1992 �trou�h 2t?n6
City
Year Instailation 1 Instalia#ion 2 Tota# Rata Charge
ithousands af v�lt�ns) �r�er th4usand)
1992 2,85U.OQ0 9{�.�Q 2,940.t)00 1.43 4,204.20
993 2,"50.OQ0 5,9�.t�0{? 8,2d�d,0�0 1.�Q 't 3,1$4.d0
4994 i,989.015 4,407.869 6,3�6.8&4 1.7't� 1tI,87A.7p
1595 2,4fi�,0'18 4,267.2Gft 6,735.2$4 1.70 11,449.98
�9as �,�oo.ssa z,���.��o s,��s.�so �.�o �,asz.s�
19�7 3,488.13fl 3,253.�7d 6.741;500 1.7� 11,T97.63
�sss �,�2s.�a 2,�r�o.�so �,zss.�a2 �.sa 7,7�s.�a
1999 1,747.4�0 4,105.480 5,$52.$20 1.9Q 11,120.55
2004 1,a73.2'16 991,414 2,5f4.630 2.t}Q 5,129.28
2oa� a,5ao.2sa 2,580.2�a z.00 s,�so.a�
2002 2,604.320 2,453.900 5,098.220 2.10 10,7Q6.26
2003 1,888.396 2,352.280 4.238.676 2.16 9,155.54
Zt�?4 1,928,549 1,851.390 3,780.935 2.22 8,393.68
2005 1,$21.350 1,906.p15 3,727.365 2.28 8,498.39
s
20fl6 2,226.110 559.9Q0 2,786.010 2.37 6,642.84
133,499.21
I
i
A
u
r w
E
fr
r;:
h
n
y.
f
T
�a
y
G
fi N'
L
..�,t
..i:
t
F h r.':
5
r
r a.
y.n
:�t.
C
y i
di
r�
,.n s::
,.::a
e
j.
,�t
i S�.
r .a
1.1
x
F
i
a;. I
v
i
..,.r
f
s r
s.
i rs� y
i
i
;s.:i
r
n
k
l
4
.'i
i,
�:a ..,n
f.
r:
t
rS ...i
�.a:
.:i
n'
�i
:'a.�
.n
:S.x
x:
.i�
r
.r.'.:
.i
�qr .:i
v:'..
:'t�i
f
...:i
CClUNCIL ITEM MEMORANllUM
Tf): City �ouncil
�t4M: G�rt Bogane�, City 1���
DATE: May 9, 2407
SiJBJECT: Water tili nd d lin r readiu f� amendmcn�ts
u o�i a e ueat mete
�Y F �`Y 9
Recommend�tion:
I mm�nd acla o llanec� e�rvice Char es
r�o p��i n of the resolut�on amendu�g th+� Masce S g
Fec ft�r Deiinquent Meter l�.eadings and Councii Policy 2.32(4� of the Water Utility Meter
Reading Policy iishing a hearing afficer process irl lieu of a public hearing,
Back�ro�nd;
II, Tl�is xtem wa� reviewed by the City Cc�uncil at twa work sessions. Fc��lowing the ,Apri1 S`�
w�rk sessi+an the c+�nse�asus o� Council was ta consider changes to ow curren# pc�licies
and practices relate+d to �ielinquent meter readings.
ARer four quarters of failing tv report meter readings the C�ty i.s authori�d to shut the
wat�r off unless #t�e resident�al propert3' re�uests a hearin�, The prop�s�d resolution
amends the curr�nt Cauncil Policy by substituting an adrn�inist�a�ve hearing o�f'icer
prc�c+�ss in li�u of pub�ic hearing before the Council to shc�w ca:use as tt� why their water
shou�d no# be �ut o�f.
The additional p�liey ci�ige will increase the fee for delinquent meter readings fram
$2,00 to $1�.40 for the first quarter, from $5.00 to $2'7.OU in the secand q�arter, from
'$1A�.0� ta� $37.0{� at th� third quarter atid to $50.00 for aii subser�u�nt qu�rters.
Fiscal Issnest
Tl�e reven�e generaied from the increased fees is exp�cted to be iusignificant. The
gr cia� l�n�fii from this policy should be imprQVed cash flow due earlier
i�Y�ents a3nd increas�cl rev�nue due to more accurate readings. It is also e�cpected that
significant sta�#` time will be saved by eliminating frequent revisits t4 p�raper#ies in an
att�amgt tt� coUe�ct r�addings,
G: Dan �orde�t
Member intrc�duceci the fotlawing resolution ar�r!
moved its adaption:
REStJLU'TIOAI NO.
RESC?LUTION AMEI�tUTNG THE CITY C4UNGIL C(}D� C}F P'OL.ICIES;
SECTIU3�J 2.32 WATER UTILITY METER READING P4LICY AND
AMFNDING THE FEES FOR DELINQUEh1T METER READING�
WHERE�4S, the City Council adoptcd FtesolutiQn Nc�, 2QQ6-46 on August ]4, 2t}06,
whi+ch established a City Counci� Ca1e of Policies; and
WHEREI�S, the City Council adopted Resatution No. 2405=�fi2 on November28,
20U5, which estabi�shed �ees for d�linquent rneter readings, and
WHEREAS, revisions to Section 2.32 Water Utility Meter Readi�� I'olicy and fees
For de[inquent nnet�r re�din�s were proposed by staff and recammen�led ta the City Council for
adaptian; and
WHEREAS, the �ity Coun+eii reviewed said revis�ons at a Work Session on Agril 9,
�Otf7.
N�L??W, THEREF+ORE, BE [T RESULVED by the City Council af the Cit� of
Broaktyn Center, Minne�ta, that Section 2.32 af the City Gouxtcil Cc�de Qf Policies t� and he�eby is
amen+ded as follows:
2.3� Water Utility Meter Reading Policy
Br�klyn Genter Chdinance 4-105 requires that a�l water utility custorn�rs read their
meter� and pmvide th�rse readings to the UtitiCi�s Uivis�on. Secction 42f32 sates t�at
water service may be discontinued to anY PmP�rtY far cl�sregard of duly established
�rates and re�ulatic�ns. The follawing is the policy regar�ing rnet�r neading;
Reaideatfal Proper�s: A meter reading is due 18 days aRer tl�e date of
mailin� meter reading cards.
At+��-Residentisi Progerties: Publi� Utilities Di�ision err�ployees read nan=
r�sidea�taal property metcrs each quarter.
3. if a rneter r�ng is not provided and the meter reading must be cstimated,
then a delinquent meter reading PenaltY sh�ll be asscssed ta the custam+�r on
the next utility bili. Metterr reading pensalti�s s�e established at�nwalCy with the
utilities rate schedules,
4. Residential Pro�rtiea: If after �our cor►secutive ��a�ters t1�e custc>m�x h�s
nc�t submitted a meter reading, the Fublic Utilities Divis�on shail notify th�
customer that th�y have 14 days to s�hedule an ag�tain�nent for meter
readin�, Such notice shall atsa infvrr� t#ae cu�rner that they }tave a right to
demartd a �ie hearing
befQ� a hearin� 4fficer d�si�te� bv the �itv Mana� to s�ciw cause as to
RES�LUT�UN NQ.
why their water should not be shut off, The demand must be rrtade ia writing
tv the City Cterk within 10 days. Ifno written dem�and is t�eceived within that
time pericrd, then it is assnmed the custom$r waives the right ta a hear�ng.
5. No�-Residenti�l Prnperties: If after twc� cc�ns�cutive q�arters the Public
Utilities Divisian has not been abte to r�ui a met�r, Lhe customer s��l be
notified that they have 14 days ta s�l�ectt�le ar� aPPaintrnent fc�x meter reading.
Such ncztice shall also inform the custorner that they h�v� a righ� to demand a
�is t�a�ri�ng befare a hearin� offccr desi�nat�d bv the Citv M�na�er a�e
ta show cause as to why their water
should nc�t be shut off. T'he demand must be rnade in writing ta �►e City
Clerk within 10 days. If na written dennand is re�eived within tttat time
periad, then it is assumed the customer waives the ngh# tc� a hearin�.
6,
FQ�ldwin� th� shavy c�use hearine,
tt�e hearin� officer sha,ll mak� findin�ts and recar�nmendatian to the Cit�
Man�er. whose determination shall t� e�ft�rced.
'7. If by the end uf the 14-day period the custfl�n�rr refizses ta schedulc an
a�pointment or if the Public tltilities Division is e�$ble to utherwise gaiin
access tv the building or obtain a r�ad'uag, and if the custamer has �at
c#emanded a public hearing, then the water shall t�e turn+�d aff immediately.
BE ]T FUR'I'HER RESOLVED by the City Council c►f the Crty of Brc�oklyn Center,
Minnesvta, that thc fallowing fees for delinquent meter re�.dings sh�ll be ef�ecti�+e far all bitiings
issued �n or after July 1, 2t1{}7:
I3e�inquent mcter r+eading pec account
(per con�ecutive quarter Non Refund�bie)
$l7 First +QuaaRer
�2? Second Q�arter
$37 Third Qu�rter
$Si] —�c�urt� Qu�rter and Each Subsequent Qu�rter
Ms�v l �4, �Ot17
Dai+� Mayc�r
A°�'TEST:
City Glerk
The rnotion for the acl�ption �f the fc�regoing resolution was duly secorni�d bp memt�er
and npon vote being t�aken thereon, the following voted in �a�+or thereof•.
and thc following vuted �gainst the s�arne:
wh�ereu�n said resolwtion was declar�d duly passed and adopted,
SECTICIN II GEIYERAL PULIC:IES
c�y co�c�t c� �',+�«o���x
232 'W�ter Ut�ty A�r�t�ar Pa�
B�yn C�ste.� Ur�iinarice A-1U5 re�ir�s that sl[ vvata utility c re�i ��eir maters and
�ovide d�e W t3�e Util�tti�s DivisiaR►. S�ectio� 42t12 s�tes tMat watrr �vias lnay bt
disco�t�u�d ta any for di�regard of da�iy eatabtished rul+cs and regt�latic�s. The
following is the pc�licy re�mg me�'�t$:
1, Rt�de�tisi �'raperties: A rn�er reading is due i8 days aft�r the date of tnailing metez'
��e�ing cards.
2. Non-R�eti�tl k'roperNes: Public Utiiities Division �spioyecs read nan-resi�s#ial
p�rty me�rs each �iaite�'.
3, If a� me#er is not �ovi�d aad the meter reading mtr�k br� estimated, tt�ect
d�l" t me� resdin8 P�a��Y �i be asssssed to the cu�md� �s the next utility bill.
Me�er rtading p�lties �e esiabtishai �nualiy with tl�e utilities ra� scl�duie.s.
4, tit� Pro�+ertC�: If aRer foiu �s�dvt quart�s thc �S
sub�ti�c1 a rnater thE Public U8lities Divi�on shall notify the oustoXnar that t#�cY
havt 14 days to �h�tlule aa appaintme�t far me� resding. Such notice st�tt a�o
._.._�p+NUA�:r�
inform ti�e er that t�y have a n t to deansnd a ks�fnrc
te.f! hv th� ri�v Mana��, to show ca�e as fao why zhelr w� st�uld nc�4r be shuc a�a�►��
o�': Th+e mus� be made ia wnting to the City Cle�k wAi9�� ld days. Tf sm writis�t
i� r�ivcd within tl�t time period, th�n it is assum.ecl t#�e c r waive� tt�s
right t,o a t�earing.
i+i+�n- tial Ptv� If aRsr two oonsecutive q�zasters the Public Urilities
Divisic�sn 1a� n+� bec� a�ble to read a meter, the cuatott�cr shall be r�ti5ed that tl�y hav�
lA da3+a to sci�e�le an ap�ointment for meta r+cading. S`�h ncatice �e;ll �tsct iufar�n the
c that du�ry have a nght to dansnd a,�earmg befc� a he.aT'�'�,
p�,the Cicv !NFan ,,_si�ow cause as tlu�r water st�u}d nc� be shut,off, 11�e_ _..--����n�r.��
must Ix made in wri4ng u> the C�ty Ckxlc wnthin lU ila3%s. If �so w'riite�i d�ianil
is rec�cived within that tinne period, t}�n 'rt is a�med thc customar waives the right ta a
hc,ar�ng.
�olfow3n¢ ti�� show _cause hcarin� the h�arina o�ticer shsll rnske fir�d` s ac!d oelnead�?��ca�*
recnm�nendation to the Cit•+ �.�$�Lu+ho's insUon s�hatl he enforced, m.�,�r�e�tie'
o�.r�ar. prap«�y a�daaa u,8'w
e�lu r� a�u a i�daean src
7. �f �t' 1�' CA!d O��IC ��-t�8}r �Cl'lOi� 1�1C Cii3� ���115� W�C�lC�t1�C 8Yf 8�07�1 O!' 1� �p
itlt P"1t�IC �iY�121� �31Y13f� i� tTi19��l: 1�0 Ot�lWlSE �t1 �S 10 t�7iC �71�t� M +D�t1
�171$, 1� �iC �1A9 If04 �p�[l� 8 p17�iC �'ICBfiA� �S t�1C WBSG� UC
Off ��ely.
Rt�e City �nci3 �l� No. 93-63
�Y Ce�+ 14R3/46
R�sceltaneou� Services �"xty of BrQVkI}m Center
f'
..k..
.....,.'...w,....£ .:'.?'C W.;..i. .,>„<,�.n.� a.:
.m ..;w.. ..r. a..,:.,. �.'w 1. _.a.
�A�C�' �#���r' �.@S. �O. ��Q3
$8se Rate �1.11 pet�l,{ft�Q gatiatiS
tt�uuarterly Minunwn Rate
Sf8*' Mster �7.'�0
3J4" Meter $12.10
I" M�ter �15.3$
1 1/2" Met�r $19.78
2" Meter �38.47
3" Meter �76.93
4" Meter 13U.79
6" Meter �340.Q4
Meter $Sb6.U3
lf�" 1Vie#er $753.96
Fire proteetion in�pection $52
Privv�tt�e hydrant msintenaisce Labor, ar�tcrials, �uipme�t, anc�
overhead
Delinquent account, quart�rly charge Greater of $3 ar 10% of unpaid
bal�nc�
Gertifcatien ftsr collection w+itb property ta�ces �34
Service'�esturation, Monday tlamugh Friday (except holidays) �31
B�twr.�n the hours af'7:30 nM and 3:00 Plul
�ervic� ItesWra#ion, Saturday, Sunday, Holi+days and �83
Between tiie hours of 3;(�D PM at�d 7:30 nht
Deiinquent metsz� readin�g per accourtt (per cansecudve quarter, non- �17/ist Quarter
refundabte) $2712nd Quariter
�37/3rd Quarter
SSO%aah subs+�queant Qua�ter
Gurb �top st�nd pipe rcpair S4U
Hydrant Meters
5i8'" t�r314" Metar �i�
I?eppc►ss;t S2
Daily Itern�1 SZO
Mo�thly R:e�atal $20
�ulini�n�tm Rental
2 11�" Mt�
rt �1�
Daily �ental ��40
M�rnhlj+ ite�tal $14U
�+Iinimum Rental �25lday (Res. Na. 20�14-70)
P for violation of add�ve�a s�r'inklin$lwatcrin� ordinance
jVl+eed �s aail#temovai Res.-1��. 24f40-4�
W�d Cu�te�'s Fec �45/hour
Re' ti�n �ee ��0�
S}�eei�l Assessme�ts Service �har�,e �30 P�r' p�csi c�n v�+hi+eh a special
meni is l,evie�l
Capitz�lized Interest Ch�e {ass�s�ed weeds oulY) �l0 natice
Wtll Wa�ter Test $10
Zo�in� l�t�rs CCo�muaity De+vciovrn�ent) �35
Fee Schedule �'age 15
1VIINL)'I'ES QF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY CQUNCIL
�F THE CZTY 4F BR40KLYN CEI�JTER IN TH� C�UNTY
O� �-IENNEFIN AND THE STA,'TE C}F MINNESt}TA
STUDY SESSIQN
APRIL 9, 2007
GITY HALL COUNCIL CI�L4MBERS
CALL TO Q�ER
The Brooklyn Center City Ct�w�+cil met in Study Sessian �Ied: to arder by Mayc�r Tiam Willsvn
at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Tun Willson �nd Counciilmembers Kay Lasman, Mary Q'Cc�nnor, I}an Ryan, and Mark
Yelich, Aisa px�r�t were City Manager Curt Bo�aney, Public Warks Direci�ar�City �gineer
Todd B�amstram, City Attc�rney C�arlie I.eFevere, and Deputy �iry Clerk Camitie i�l`orley.
CITY COIJI�TCIL DISC'USSION 4F AGEI+�DA ITEMS ANI} QU£STIONS
C��ncilmember O'Connor requested the following chang�e to the Study Session miu�utes of
March 26, 2i�17;
Page 2
It was the majority co�sensus of the City Council to consider inc�ease the surcharge far
failure to repc�rt m:et�r r�adings, whiie allowiz�g
fc►r th+� appeal process through a hearing officer.
Cc�uneilmember C}'Connor requested the following change to the Regular Session minutes of
Ma�z+cc� 26, 20�7:
P
Gc�uncilm�mb�r fl'Cvnnar m�ved to reduce #he assess�a�z�t of 7124 Riverdale Roakd bY
$3 reflectin� anly street assessment charges f4r one unit.
I# was the majarity ct�nsensus of#he City Council tv arnez�d the requested change to Page of the
S°t�,tdy Session mi�auutes as follows and to accept the c�iange tcz Pa�ge 4 af ihe Regtilar Session
minutes.
It was the majority cc�nsensus of the City Caunctt to cvr�sider increasing the surcharge
f�vr faidure ta re�t�t met�r readings, consrder shut-r�,f�"praceedings, wl�ile allvwi�tg for #he
a�peul prc�cess #hrough ca hearing o, f�`"rcer.
T1�re r� discussic�n an Item Aio, 9a, where it was indicatec� that the City does not p�rform
tren�hing on private properiy. Public Works Direct4rtCity Enginee� Todd B1om�fixom discct�ssed
trenching �ad the remaval of diseased tr�es including severing uf roc�t sys#ems.
fl4/49/0'7 -1-
�t was indic�►t�d that Item hios. 7c. and 7d. from the Consent A�enda woul� be rernoved and
�laceci the Re�az Agenda sa that the donations are properly recagnized.
There was dis�ussic�n on Item I�d. 8c. City Manager Bo�aney stated rnany attempts were made to
contact th� �ach of the team hvw�ver staff was wna.bl� to reach him.
SET l3A"TE AND TIINCE 4F J4INT MEETING W'�T� CH[ARTER �U SS�C�lwT
Mr, Boganey s�a� Manday, April 23, 2007, was the suggested dat�e for a}Qint meetinig with the
Charter Commission and noted that the meeting woe�ld replace th� �tt�dy Session.
Ii vvas ihe majt�rity cc�nsensus af the City Council to accept the date to hoid a joint m�ting with
the Charter Cc�m�ussion on Mc�nday, April 23, 2007, at 6:U0 p,m. in the Cc�uneillComnc�issian
Conferencc� Room.
MiSCELLANEUUS
�ouncilmem�er Lasman discussed an article on a tetter referring ta the Brov�iy� Park City
Council on #l�e impact of their Point-af-Saie program, M�. Boganey ind�i�cate�i that he would
copy the arti��e far #he City �+Ian�ger upclate.
Niayor Wilison stated he will be attending the League af Minnesot� �ities Mayors Conference in
Wilimar, NII� vn May 4-5, He also stated he will be �ttendir�g #he TJ.S. Cc�nference af Mayors
7S�' Annual Meeting June 21-26.
Councilmem�r "X�elich stated �ie will be absent for the May 29, 2{�07 City Council me�t3n�,
ADJC1UItN ST�TD►Y S�SSIUI�t TO INFORMAL OPEl11 FORUM WITIi CITY CUUN�IL
Councilmember Lasma�n mc�ved and Councilmember Ryan �canded to close t1� Study Session
at 6.4�t3 p.�n.
N��tion una�nc�u�sly.
�tECOIVVENE STUDY SESSIOt'�
C�uncilmember I. �n4�ed and Councilmer�ber Ryan s�co�ded tc� reccsnver�e the Stutiy
Sessinn a# 6.51 p.m.
Motion u ously,
itEYISED WATER UTILITY SHUT-U�+'F 1'OLICY
Mr. Bogat�ey da'scussed the history of the Water Utility Shut-Off P'vlicy previc�usly discussed by
the �Gi#y �aw�i�. He stated i� reviewing the issues, staf�' detexminert the m�od c�f e�stimatin�
us�e s�uld be moci�fieci, �i is b�
Per c�a� using an average of 3.5 for the purpo�e c�f �stima:tes, a tc�tal of 350 gallons
pe�r day. H+� st�at� this methad sho�uld help to encou�ge those whc� are not repQrting �h�u meter
{�4l�091U7 -2-
readings to r��p�rt them. i� �c
z�t r���: �ua�e SS:t.04:
Ci Attorne Gharli� LeFevere ex lained that the Ci �s �s
�Y Y P �Y
�ci� l�y p�q��� He e�laine�i that only the amount needed ta pay for the utilaty may t�e
chazged and with fees, may not exce+ed the cost to provide the utility.
This discussic�n wa.s continueci during the Wark Session.
ADJOURNMENT
Couticilmember Lasman moved azid Councilmemt�r Ryan sec4x�ded �v ciose the Study Session
at 7':40 p.m.
Motion passed unanimt�usly.
fl4I�19/07 -3-
�rnrc�r�s o� �ac ��.c�c�E�►nvGS oF errY covr��cr�carrc��e
DEVELC}P'MENT AUTHC3RITY QF THE CITY UF BRC?OKLYN GENTER
IN TH� COUNTY OF HE%NI�IEF�I A,ND
THE STATE OF MA�INESOTA
WQRK SESSION
APRIL 9, 20U7
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAi�IBERS
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Ce�at��r City �ounciUEcor�omic Development Authority (EDA) met in Work Session called to
or�r by �ayar/President Tim Willson at 8: I Q p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayflr/Pr�es�ident Tim Willson �nd Cauncilmembers/Conunissianers Kay I.asmat�, Mary O'Gonnar, Dan
Ryan, aztd Mark 'Yelich. A1so present were City Mana�er Cur�E Baganey, Pub�ic Works L7►irector/City
Engineer Todd 81+�mstrom, City Attomey Chazlie LeFevere, and �eputy Gity Clerk Camille Worley.
WATE1t5HED C4A+iMISSION MAdUR FLAN AMENI3ME�i`1" UPDATE
CUMMISSIONER CAR.MUDX
Carnmissia�er I�athleer� Carmody presen#�ed a FowerPoint presentatian on the Major Plan Arnendment
Update wlaere the followiz�g infonnation was summarized: Propused Major Plan Amcr�dment, Waier Quality
Plan ti�� Budget Is�a�acts, Prc�o�d CIP Implementation R�quiir�s Three Chan�es to the �Vla,n�agement
P�an, Proposed Major Pla» Aamendme�nt, Capital Improvement I'rcrjects, Sample Project Scc�re Card,
Fundin� Uptions, and Cc��clusi�ns. She stated concern with th� Implementatit�n of ihe W�t.�r Quality Ptan
which is proje:cted to exceed th� o�rating budget cap. S,he sta�d concerns with the scorin� method for
projeact s�l+�ctic�n.
Public '�Nvrks Diar�ctor/Ciiy Engineer Todd Blomstrom discuss�d varirous as��ts of the Majc�r Plan
Amendment,
The�re was discussia� c�n the A�Iajr�r Pl�n Amendment where several p�rspectives were p�rovid�t.
It was indicat�d that �tis itena w�uld be place�ci on a future agenda far Cit�y Coeu�eil consideration.
ItEYISED WATER UTILiTY S�UT-OFF PULICY
This discussio� is a�ntinuation fi�m the Siudy Session.
l+vir. Boganey st�ated higb�r penal#y may h�lp to collect meier a�adiri�s on d�linqu�nt accounts.
Councilmember O'Cflnnar asked if �he house would be shut down if the water was t+� tiuned off. Mr.
Bog�ney r�:�sponcle�i that he clid not kna�w,
fl41U9107 -1�
fihere was ciiscussior� rnz the i��m re a $17.�, plus ar� �l@�t�.. q� ��e,
��CI q v� a �l
a h�g �1 r�s ��e� �o be �ppn�pr�ate.
It w�s ihe majority �o�nsus to mt�ve fc�rward with the prc�posa�. N#r. Bc+ga�y stated h�e would bring the
item back to t�e City Cotuncil f�r their consideratian at the neact Gity C�e�ncil me.etin�.
CUUNCiL SiJGGESTED WURK SE�SIQN ITEli4+IS
It was th� �jc�nty consensus of the City Council to a��cept the prc�posed Cauncil �licy mc�ification
regardin� WorY Session item� and piace it on the next City Cauneil meeting agenda for considerat�on.
57� ANI? L4GAN DEVELOPMENT AGREE1MEl'�'T
Mr. Bo�anep distr�bwted an update on the 57�' and Lo��n 13ev�Ic�gment Agreement ac�d discussed t�e
information presen#cd. He illustraied that a lazger piume of vapars have been faund than expe+cted. He
discus�ed the findiiigs �rf the ��innesota Pollutian Control firgency (MFCA}. ki� stat�d the City is woricin�
with the County wbka has indicated more tesring is ne�ied. He stat� afteir testing, it may be justifi�ci t� �nt�r
ti�e ha�nes and implemeni a v�n#ing systtem. He stated Steiner Development �wouid like to proceeci with t�e
commlercial aspect �f their develr�pment, holding aff on the residential asp�#. He di�cussed the op�ions t4
be consid+ereti by the City Councit.
ADJOURNMEI�iT
Cc�uncii�ember/Com�n�ssio�aer I�as�na� maved and Councilrr�ember/Cornmissi4ner l�ya� seconded
adjc�urnrnent of the City �owa.caliEr,Qnomic Development Authority �t�rk Sessian at 1Q:U? p.m.
�viotion passed una�aimously.
{k�1t39lU'7 -2-
MEI�t)RAI+� CC)U1�CIL W{?RK SESSIt)�
�A"[�; '1 S, 2�7'
Tt?: Brookly� t.,�tcr City Council
FR�?�ri: �u�t Bt� y, City Mart
S �'l'. LTtili� sl�ut c��for fatleu� ta �esd meter
Ct�Ul��1L ACTIQN �2E(�iIT D
�ina� d� 'cm to staff in� c�anges in aur wa�er �hut of�'�xrlicies �rad p�cti�es.
BACK�R�'tLiA�
'C�e ,j� rn r�►riew�c! at tl�c Ww�k �essic�r�. The C+auncil d"er+�.�t�cl st�f�'tc�
c�sicl�r r�vv�sitm ta the policy so tha�t rty ovvnr.rs wau�kl h�� a c in�x�vv�e to
prc�vid� mmeter
P`��a iu�r �1� #�t�
r
T�irci ancl Su�qt�at�t �t��rters f�r na� re�cling tt�e sncEer.
tes �e City Cast ass�iawd with t� activit�es �c tv �t in� a�r
i� a� ��6.27, b�licve are tbe minimum +ecists co City the City ld
�ng.atrSils.-U4f�rea���!
S� G�e �+��g
s
�s �t� t r.
�V�t�er [J�;e �1i��►#�
H' "c�a31�� n�a ing t�s been �eived a�c +cst%�r��Ge fs�c water u�$e �as
#1� ptit�r sitnil�r quaiter. We lxliev+� th�s �p h ta� u�a
t�e For this n c�ur intent is to mt�dify o�ur esrtim �ar
�o�-�r�rs. W+e vyriiii b+� us�t�g a c,�rtificx� st�ndard foar av ho ��a .'t"� c
est�m��n� d�rd �'ur rc�ic�nti�t usc is 350 gatlor� per c�ay. W� betie�rr+�'t�t t'�is
star� �in a�� tial r!4w�nuc loss and ix is l�k�ly e�co�g+e r�prarrtir�g by
vvh� ace bc"ia�g tu�dee� bi#le�i at gc�sent.
CCf�7Pi+G�L PU�LIC'St' L'�SLt�S
1���� scd ��n�s in �i�'rty practic�s and praeede�res �erve ir�e af t3�e
ut�ity ar�d th� cu�tot��rs that we serv�.
CflUNCIL ITEM MEIVI�RAN1}[J1VI
T+O, Curt Boganey, City Manager
F�2:CI�M� fir�dd Blomstrom, i)irectar af Fub�ic Works
DATE; lt+iarch �1, 200'7
�C1BdECTs Wat+er Utility Shut-off Falicy Regarding W�ter Meter �iea�din�
�te�►mmc��l�on:
Public Wt��s staf�£is re,camme�d�ng that the City of Brc�al�tyn Center r�nstitut� th� �rrovistc�ns
crf �i�y Ca��ncil Policy �.32 relate.d to Water Utility l�f�ter l��ading. This policy pravides f+�r
tt�e tetm�natitr� c�f wat�r �rviee ir� respor�se to a ceustamer's failu�e tu provid� �eter re,adun�.
Th� rccs�mmendat�i4n is bas�d on an increasing fr�y�t+�cy of m�ter r' g issu+�s with
customers.
B�ckground:
S+�tian �.�2 of the Ci�y Cade of Policies outlines th� water ucility n�eter reading p€�licies and
p ures fcrr the City �f 8roo�Clyn Center. Several ye�rs ago, the City disconfiinu�d t�e
pr�rct�c� t�f w�r s�ut-offs in r�spc�nse to delinquent uti�i:ty biiis a�d fail�are af cus��►mers c�
rei�um �ns#+�ir readin� cartis. D�linquent utility bills are curre�ttiy �r�;ss+�ct t�ns�u�,h t�e speciat
�s ent p I� respottise to customer failure tc� retur� rneter m�adin� cat�tts, the Public
Utili�i�s l7ivision has been hand delivcring notificatic�n daor tags to custc�m�rs,
'I'�te Finar�ce �ep��nnit re+cently PrePa�'ed a list of eustomers w�o have r�at r�t�ur}��cl m�t�
re�►cii� c fc�r rnore th� �owr cca�ns�utivc quarters (r�o� th� an� y�ear}, A to#�t of t�o
h�t c�ne (23I) cus�uomers c�ur�ently have noti xeturned xnetcr for mor� th� f�ur
cc�n�ecutiv�e �uazters, Within this r.ategary, a total c�f fifte�n t 5) custc�mers currentty have n�t
r�tur�d m�cter e�tis fttr more tlaazt �ight consecutiv� qt��rs (more t� twtr y�azs},
After sever�l years of implem��ntation, Publie Ws�rks staff �as conclucted that the cunent
praActice of h�nd �;eliver�ng nt�tificatian do�r tags 'ss cic�rly not eff"ectivc, An incr�si�ag
amrauat c�f si�time is �ing ccrnsurned by delivcry of notific�a�tio� doc�r t�gs.
�taf�is avaa�able furtt�er discuss this issue at yout requ+cst.
Wmr;rr tltilfty A�tcr J�er�dirtg Palicy
C'rty a,(1� Ce��er
I
,2
h
F.
K,.:
n
x
t
..ib
T 1.
c
.:Y.
4:
Y ..j.. ce::
w::
'i
a
f x 4u
i
f
v
i s N D
i
i
.Y.
.�.a k
C
.����M�`��.���� x������ w�
z,
v
k
�4
l
r
`C J o
u.:
.e
w
2 p
Y �4
E
t
t.: E
z
f
a.
F
z. y�
i.
z;
v. S
S
4
rk�c,
.i ..f
y
:,r
F
.k�,{ ,y
��Y
-.i;
4,� i Y
Y i�
e
i:
y�
n s
y
r:
E
N i
.._'y
r
3
ih
:.:N
f
..k.
.::2
s':y
d
,.i.
i.
:v�
'i l_
::.i
n.
COUNCIL ITEM �MEM43R�1AUM
T4: Curt Boga��ey, City Manager
FRUM: 5haron Knutsr�n, Ci Clerk
SE t�
DE�'T'E: Ma}j 9, 2007
SUBJECT; Gharter C4mmissian Recommendati€rns �eg�rrding Section 3.l 1 and 4,04 of the
City Charter
Recommena�tion;
T r�mmend that it�e City Council consider the Charter Comrnissian recamnaenda�iQns for
Se�tion 3.11 and 4.04 of the �ity Charker. The City Cc�un�il �ay �nact a chat�ter amendment by
�rdinai�ce. If it ihe desire c�f the Gc��uncil to proceed with adQptio�a af these charte� �nendments,
then it is recommended that the City Council direct City staff tn draft an ordinance amendmer�t ta
that effect� whi+cla wauid be brought back at the next C�uncil me�ti�ag f4r con�ideration.
Backgr��und:
For the past twc� years the �harter Commission has be�n working on� two amendmez�ts ta the Gity
Charter, spe+cifically Sections 3.11 and 4,04. Tl�e Charter Com�nission met in jaint session with
the City Cc�uncil on Apri123, 240'7, and tl�ere was discussian regazding the Chart+�r Com�missi€�n
recommendation an the two a�nendrnents {draf3 minutes attached).
Th+e Charter Commissian m�t an April 25, 2007, and Chair Stan Leino has requ� that the
Charte�r Cammission r�ommenda�ion on the two amendments be resented to khe City Ccruncii
P
fcar consideration {draft minutes attached).
�udget Issuea:
The reve�nue �enerat�d fronr� t�ie increased filing fee is exg�cted to be u�signi���ant. IA�ith t�e
addition of the option uf �liing by petition, there wilt be gr�ater staff'time inv�lv� in the pracess
of verifying that the p�etitian subnnitted by the candidate inctudes SU registered vot�.
t
h tere
MINUTE� t�F TH� PROCEEDiNGS 4F TH� G�TY CC?UAT�IL
4F THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CE;NTER
IN THE CQUNTY OF HENNEPII� �4�
T'HE STATE 4F MINNESQTA
CI1'Y COUNCII./CHARTER COMMISSIt�!N T(3INT MEETING
APRII., 23, 2t34"l
COUNCII�/CtJi�ZMISSION C�NFERENCE RC?(?M
CALL TO O1tDER
The Broaklyn Center City Cou�cil met in Work Sessian with the Charter Commission at City
Ha'� and was calied tc� ardec by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:M3 p,m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Tim Wi�lson and Counci�members Kay Lasmaz�, Mary 4'Cor�ttor, Dan Ryan, ar�d Marlc
'Y'elich, Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, and I?�puty City Glerk Gamille Warl�y.
I
Ch�ter Comm�ssioz� Members present were Cocnmissiane�s Stanley I.eino, Hruce Lru�c�, Eciward
1'�elson, iViary Nierengarten, Eile�n Oslund, and Richard Phillips.
DISCUSSIUN t)F +C�►R'TER COMMISSIUN RECUMl1+iENl�ATI+DNS
Ther� wa� discussion c�n the proposed Charter ehanges to Sections 3.11 and 4,04. It was
indi�ated that the Charter Commission felt the chan�es to Section 4.04 were n�essary to help
cover �tlministrative costs �ssociated v�+ith candidate filing. It was also indicax�ci that th� c�age
will mt�ciemize ihe section along with requiring poten�igl ca�ndidates to appiy rnore #'ore thaught
tQ their can;�idacy. I# was explained that "Minnesota" s�ctuld be removed from "Minnesota
j and a ifitc form
Af�'idavit of +Ca�didac �Cause rhe forra used is Affidav�t of aCandida�y spec
Y
to Minnesota does �n�t eac�st. There was concern expres�ed that the propo� 1
e wc�uld
make charg�es for cc�pies of t3rdinances mandatory rather than dis�ar�oz�ary, It was stat�d that
the City Co�e of (hdinances is �vailable on the City's website.
There was discussaon on the grc�cess of Charter amendments in grevious y+�azs,
Ch�rter Commission Chair S�ta�iley Leino indicated that a recs��endatio� would be �"arward�d
to t�e City Ct�uneil f�llowin� fiut3�er discussion an #h� twc� sectiar�s at the April 25, 2U07,
Charter Cornmission m��ing.
ADJOI]�tt�ENT
Councilnaemk�r �sman mov�d and Councilmember Ryan seconded adjournm�rrt c�f the City
C+awu�cil me�ltit�g a# 6:44 p.m.
Motiun pass�d unanimously.
I
0�41231fl7 -1 I)RAFT
(Draft} �vIINUTES OF APRIL Z5, 2�7
BRt)OKLYN CENTER
CHARTER COI�MISSIQI�
Tl�e meeting was called to arder by Chairman Stan Leino at 7:04 PM.
Roll Call Secretary Ga�y Brvwn called roll; Gary Brown, Stan L.eina, Bruce Lund, Ed Nelson,
1M�ary Niereng�rten, �iteen 4slund, R.ichard Ptullips, Ricl�ard Theis were present.
A.bsent. Ha�rold Middleton, Anthnny Mills
Annroval of Minutes The draft minutes of the January 24, 2447, meetin� were reviewed.
Nelson tnad� a mation, secQnded hy Phillips to approve the minutes as submitted.
Fa�ssed unanirnously 8• 0,
U!d 13usincss
Prona�sed Charter Chan�es Chairrnan Leino reported on the j�int me�ting with 3he Gity Council
held on April 23, 2U07, at whic� iim� the City Council reviewed vvit� th� cammissiot�ers their
concems a�ut Lhe prc3�msed charter changes. After discussion of proposed charter char�ges, a
motion was m�de by Nierengart�n, seconded by Phillips, to am�nd the propo�ed charter change
ta Section 3.11 to rea�i as follQws:
S�tion 3.11. CC?I3IFICATIOPI AND PUBLI�ATIQ�N QF QRDIN�tCES. The City
sha11 codify and publish an oardinance code in bQak, Pamph�et ar c�antinuous refer�nce
laose Ieaf forcn. Copies shall be made available by the Cowacil at t�e Qffice t�f the City
�lerk for ger��al dxs#ributic�n to the public €�ee in accara'�nce
with Gouncil �licy. 7�re City Code shall be published crnd maintcrined on xhe Ci�'yy's
wel�sit�.
Passed unanimously 8-0
A#�ea° further discussion, motion by Brow�n, seconded by Tl�eis ta ana��nd �ra�seci chazter chan�e
to Sectio�t 4.04 to read as follows;
Section 4.04. FILE BY �"���4� FEE OR BY PETI?'IQN.
Upvn r�eceiving a
enrr�pleted A, ffia�avit of "Candidacy form and tl�e payment �f a�ling f�e of t►vent,y-frve
dollrrrs ($25) by a�n,vtential candidate or frling by the petati�rn vf�. fPj' (SO) registered'
voters on behrrlf of `the cartdidate, the Clerk shall certify the eligibility of th� cant�ficiate
and place the name af the candidate upon th� ��t� �lection batic�t without partis�an
designatia�.
R
P�� i o�i�o�aa
Passed uttanimausly 8-0
Renor� af Audit Chair Commissioner Oslund gave the au€lit repart whic�i stated tlnat Ch�ter
Commission had spent $25S.Ot� in 2406 for mailings ta commissianers fcyr quarterly and ann�al
me�etings. Motic�n by Oslund, seccmded by Lund to acc�pt the audit re�ort as su�rnitted.
Passed us�animc�usly 8-0.
New Business
Next meetin� June 2? �t was +decided that commissioners should be prepared to discuss Chapter
9 of �lie C�r�.rter deaatiing wi�h Eminent Domain as it relates to recent changes in �tate Law at the
next me�ting.
Future Me�tin� T3at�s C3ct 24� 2007, �d January 23, 2(�08.
Adiour�ment Matiot� by 4slund, s+�conded by Nelson to adjourn the mee#�i�g at 8:l 1 PM.
Motion passed un�nimt�usly $-0.
Submitted for ccansidera�tion,
Gazy E. Brown
Seccr�tt�ry
Page 2 44I30/07
f
F:
Z
�4'.� l
f
r
e
:I
i;
'.:r.
e�
i
L
5
«F<
3
:.Y
2 J
C
I
v.
�F
i "t
.J: �v v
r
:3 E
5
l:
e
�;v:y
:i
r. .:.::r >r
r
r;.
i
e
v
f
z :r
x
b
:i:
s
r;,
F
G
i
2
„.2
J
..,..t,
I 4
',s�; j
f
h
i
3
3
'�.a.�:
rz.'.,
v::
t
..b.:.
y_i
a
n.'
:n
f
*?i.
J
..i
a,
i
::i: :i
w
i..
f
3
5
r-�.�.
....i .i
cnur�ciL rr�M �m�a�rrn�uu�
Tt�� c����t
�liI'� �Og�iIY4�, �1��+' �F
�f�. �i,
SiTBJE�Ts Viale�t Crime F�eductio� Initistive
��7illliBll#��t14II:
I recammenct adc�ption of the enclased resolution authc��iz�� the City M �r to j�intty �nter
into an a�nnent with the Gity of Brcxiklyn Park and the Police Executive Rese�reh Fon�m
(PERF} fi�r t�e purpo� vf canductiwg a sivay to analyze anc� determine the rc�at c�.c�s �f
increasing vioie�at crirne in Broal�lyn Park and Brooklyn Center and tcr convene a s�a�nmit of key
stakeha�ders to develc�p a set of strategies that will foeused c�n th� results of the stuely.
It is fiuther r��une�td�d the City h�anager is authorized tfl fiuid th� Brool�yn Center $14,793
c�ne-tlaird share of t�e c,ost usi�g procceds form Police Forfeiture Fwad.
��c nnd:
As a fotIow up to e�rlier m�tings with several Northw+est Hennepin communities �+eg�iing
inereasi�g vio�ent cram�, #he lead�r�hap team of the Br�klyn Center Patice D�partm��t rn�et with
representativ�s uf the Cit� of Brooklyn Park and Mr. Chuck W�xl�r, Executave Dxrector of the
Police Executive Research Forum {�ERF). Mr. Wexler is renaw�n�cl ex�ert in the field of crime
preventic�n �trat�gi�s. The r+esult �ft�ais joint meeting was a request t�aat NI�. We�cler prep� a
study praposal fc�r the Cities o#'Brc�oklyn Park and Broc�klyr► Center. The st�dy is intended to
iden�ify the nature of #he crime pxcrblems in the two citi�s and develop a comprehensive respc�nse
strategy, It was agreed tha�t aRer the proposal was receivec�, eaek► City would ccur�sider
particip�tian and s�a�ring the in the funding.
This �ncept �ci proposal; was discussed at the April 30�` joint meeting c�fthe Cities of
Brot�klyn Center and Broc�kly�n Park. The cansensus af ttYe memb�rs +�f b�t� City C4uncils was
that apprc�v�3 uf this prc�pasal shouid be eonsidered at t�he next r��u,�ar City Cotmcil m'.
This matt�r w�s cvnsidered aud appmved by the Brooklyn Park City Crawn��l at its regul�r
m March '7, 2U07.
I
Fi�c�l Iasaea:
The Poli�e �orfeiia�rc: �und has an unencumbered balance of �53,950. '�'lzese fvncis ma� b� use,d
exc�usiv�ly fc�r costs assoc�ated with police related act�vities. Since t� prc�,�e�t %s at� uabud�et�d
expense, i recammend the Forfeiture Fund as the source for fundin� this activity if approv�d by
the City Council.
Memb�rr intrc�dur.ed the follt�wit�� resolution
and rnuved iis adoptian:
:r�sa�.u�r�or� r�o.
RES4LUTT4N AUTHORIZING THE CiTY M,.�NAC'iER t3� BRUUI�:LYN
C�NTEIt T{) Ei�t'TER INTO A JOINT AGREENi�jNT WITH THE CITY O�F
BR()4�I,YN PARK AND POLICE �3�:�CLJTI�J'E RESEARCH FORiJM T4
G4I�TDIJ+CT A STUDY ON VIOI,ENT CRItviE TC► DEI,�VER A
COMPREHENSNE CRIME-REDUC'TItJI�` STRATEGY FO� BIt4(}KLYN
CENTER AND BROO!KLYN PARK
V�JTi-.1EREAS, the +�ities af Brooklyn Park and Brooklyn Ccnter l�ave expenenced
significant increases in violeat crimes; and
VfJHEREAS both cities desire to reduce said crime and the eff'ects thereof within
the cc�mmunities, and
i�VFiEREAS, it is recc�gnized thax an effective strategy ta reduce crime r�quires a
ctrmprehensive aPProach ba�sed on data, information, and analysis; and
W�FIIEItEAS, Polic� Facecutive Researct� Forum {PE�'tF) is recog�uzed as a
natzc�nal 1+�,ader in develo�aing eff�ctive strategies to con�bat viQlent cnime a�d agreect tc� perfi�rm
this study; and
WHEREAS, the r.ost c�f the study will be �44,38I, of which the cos� tc7 Brooklyn
Center wirll be 14,793 tc� be paid fram unencumbered Fatice Farfeitures Funds.
I�tUW, THEREFC?RE, BE IT RESOLVEA by the City Cauuncil of tlae City of
Brotaklyn Cexrter, Minnesota, that t�e Gity Manager is authoxized t�c�►► exec�te a joint ment
with PEItF to cor�duct the prQpos�d Violent Crime Reduction �n�tiativ� �tudy for Hrva�lyn Park
and Brooktyn C�nter.
Mav 14, 20t�?
Da#e Mayor
ATTES�':
Cit�r Ci�rk
The mptic�n far the adoption Qf the foregoing resolution was duly secondecl by xn�mb�r
and u�c,n vote bein� taken the�rec�n, the fflllowing voted in fav�r ther�c�f•.
and tt�e followin voted a' the same:
8 8�t
whereu�n said resolutic►n was declared duly passed and adopted.
�V'�olent �nme Reduct�on Ini#��t�ve far
Brou�lyn Park and Broaklyn Center
Gaa�: The ma,�or gaal ofthis initiative is to deltver a cc�mpre�ensive crim�-reduction
s�ategy far Brooklyn Park and Braoklyn Center.
Fo�r Pha�es.
Phaise 1: PERF staff' wili be+come fazniliar with the cities of Bxrrok�yn Park and
Braoklyn Centcr ar�d the�r polic� departments, as well as tlie s�cope afthe vic►lent
cnme problern in the two cammunities.
This will tre accomplished thrangh an analysis of open-source materia�s artd data
provid�l by the twa citi�s.
Phase 2: �ERF wi11 conduct a site visit to Brooklyn Park and Brooklyr� Genter ta
GB���Ct S{ItI1t1811� C�1XcR. PERF staff will canduct a series of intervi�ws wif.h key
stt�kkehoiders.
Phase 3: A detailed analysis af available vi4lent crirne infc�rmatic�n wi11 be
conciucted for both cities. A clear understa�nding af the scope of the grobiern will
be deveioped, includin� aun assessment of curxent cri�te preventian and r�duction
strategies emplc�yed by the departsnents. Underl�ing conditions and c�ther f�ctvrs
outside of the police departments contributing ta viale�t crime in the cities will alsc�
be identified. This thorough evaluation will lead to the development af a
campreh�nsive crime r�ciuction nutiative.
Phase 4; PERF will gather essential siakehalders t4 attend a ar�e-day �rime Summit
ta evaluate tihe progc�s�l crime-raduction strategies. The Summit will iead ta the
dev��opment of an intervention to reduee viole�zt crime and t�.isorder �n the
cumrnunit�es, which �tt�ndees can support and commi# themselv+es to
implernenting.
C�stz �44,381 TQtal.
Fraposed sharin� af costs: Broaklyn Pazk $29,�88 {2/3)
i Braoklyn Center $14,793 (l/3}
'�ialen� Crime Reduc�aa Initi��ive
(�RAFT�
Submit#ed Jointly to the Cities af
Brooktyn Park snd Braoklyn Center, �Viinae�c►�a
by
Police Ezecut�ve Research F'ortrm
I�#�udu�cti��
�n 2005, th� Pc�lice Executive Resear�� Fonun (PERF} studied a dramatic increase in viuient crime
that occwcred in l��neapolis. The rep�art noted that the epicenter of violence was an the northern
side of the city. As p�rt of its study, PER.F analyzed the c.�uses Qf c�ime in Minne�potis and
propc�sed s�rat�gies ta addrress the issues that were identified. 1"he Minne,apalis Police Dep�rtment
prQduced a comprehensive violent crime reduction strategy that was credite,c� with reducing
�ri�lence, sharpening Lhe focus on the issue, and strengtheni�ng rela'onships b�twe�n the city's
police department and other criminal }ustice agencies as well as the community and busin�ess
leaders.
Ttie citi�s of Bmoklyn Park and Braoklyn Center, Iocated to the norkh c�f Mi�nea�olis, have
experienced sirnilaz spikes in vialent crime in 2006. Thaugh these cities are only 3.2 miles apart,
they aze diff�rent in sc�me ways.
Brooklyn I'arlc is char�cterized as a"�rowing communi#y" with a vari�tty af development and new
building g pl�ce, Since 20U0, ihe population has increased by 1.7 percent ta 6$,550 within the
city's 2b.1 square miles. 'The Brc�oklyn Park Police Deparbm�nt is a full-service agettcy with 85
swr�m of�ic,�rs an�i �n additional complement of 48 part-time ar ful�-time civilian staf��rs. The
de�artment has a host of programs, including DARE, crime prevent�on, SWAT, crime analy�is, and
alcohol enforcernent.
Brooklyn Center is descri�Cl as a"first ring suburb of �4tinnea�aolis. Its populatian has decreased
by 5,6 percent since 200(} ta 27,551 within the city's 7.9 square mil�s. T`he Brooklyn Cen�er Police
Dep�artmer�t is made up of �43 o#�icers and 14 civilian employees. The department rc>utinely
analyzes cri�ne statistics and maiz�tains active liaison with cammunity organizatians.
In other ways, Brooklyn Park at�d �r+r�klyn Center are simi�ar. Unem�Ioyment raCes are near or
below the national av�rage, at 3,4 percent in Brooklyn P�art� and 5 percent in Brc�vklyn Center. The
raci�l demographics of the cities anee also quite similaz and bc�th have a foreign bom commuuity that
a+ccc�unts f�r more than 1�'D10 vf their population.
Ratce BrooklYn Park Bro�o�lyn Center
Wh3te ?0.3°/a I 70,4°la
Bl�t�k 14.3% C 14,1 °!o
Asi� 4.4°!0 6,5°!n
Indian I .1 1.5°�0
PE�F Vivlent �Crime Reduction Initiative Draft Proposal for Brcmklyn Fark and Brookl�yn
Center
Page 1
f Qtl1��r 9.9% �.5°!0
An addi�ional comm�n f�►ctor is tbat police chiefs from both cammuaities �re reporting
dramatic increaae in crime. The concerns of the palice chiefs aze reflected in th� Uniform Crime
Report statistics, The 20U6 Violent Crime Index for Brooklyn �'ark reve�ls a 62.3 perc�ent increase
in reported violent crime since 2fl02. Brooklyn Center r�rted a 4U.4 pereent increase in violent
crime for the same time �riad, Rc�bl7eries in BrookLyn Park increas�d by 93 :percent in just one
year-fram 20US to 20f}4- while Brac�klyn Center had a 54.8 percent increase. Both a�encies aze
workua� with Minnea}�lis and H�nrtepin County to fc�rm a jaint �ask: force ta decrea� vi�lent crime
in the thr� cities. Th� parties hope to have a full-time team af officers vvarking together by the
summer of 200'7,
PERF is pr�rposing a focused project to ideatify the nature af the vfoieat crime prub�e�n in
Broaklyn Park snd Broakiya Center follo�ved by hosting a Summit of k�y stakkeholders to
revievY, tiiscnss and strategize t�e study's findings.
Chr+anologic.ally, the prc�ject wi11 be undertaken in four phases. In t�ie first phase, PERF staff will
become farnili�ur with the cities �f Brooklyn Park and Brooklyn Center and th�ir pc�lice d�partments,
as well as the s�cape of the violent crime problem in the two commuxutie�, This will be
accomplished thtough an anallysis of open-reseazeh materia�s as well as information provicied by the
cities.
In the proje�c#'s s�ecc�nd pha�e, PERF wiil conduct a site visit to Brool�lyn Fark and Brc�oklyn Center.
Additianal data will be c+�lle.cted, and the PERF team w�li cc�ndu�t a series of interviews with key
members of t�e �lice departments CIt1CS� C012]I11l1I11� ��8(I�11'S $Il� O�C1S�$ 1'��'II'e$�11�1A�
pertinent c�iminal jiYStice agencies,
Based u�n the information �athered in the first two phases, a d+�#.�il�ci ar�atysis c�f avaiI�ble violent
crime infarn�atian will be conducted fc�r bath cities. A cle�tr understazidin� of the scope o� the
prc�blec�a�a will be develo�d, including an assessment af current crime preventivn and reduction
strategies emp�oyed by the departments. Underlying conditions and other factars �utside afthe
�xa►lice departments contribu�ing tc� violent crime in the cities v�ill a3so t� identifi+e�i, Tlus thcrr+ou�h
evaluation will lead to the develogment of a comprehensive crim� reductic�n initiativ�,
In the f�nal phase �rf the proj�ct, PERF wiil �ather essential stakeholders to attend a► one-day Crime
Summit to evaluate th� proposed crime-reduction strategies, P�rticipants will c�nne io�e#her tt�
cultivate a comm�n understanding rrf the violent crime problem i� Broo�yr� Pa�rk �d Broo�}m
Ceni��. The Summit will lead to the development of an intervention to r�duce vit�lent crune and
disorder in the communities, whieh attendees can suppc>rt and �mmit thems�lves to implementin�.
Prnie�t M�tthhodulo�;
PERF will �wrork in partnership with the Br�kiyn Fark �ul Brooklyn C�nter Police Degartme�ts t�
aclueve the project's two obj�ctives of conducting an analysis of vi4l�nx crimes in both jurisdictions
and �;�v�:ing a summit to eng�ge i� a maderated discussic►n of t�e study's fiuding and what may
be done to make the communities safer,
PERF Violent Crime Reduction Lnntiative Draft Proposal for Brooklyn Park and Brtxriclyn
Center
Page 2
Mujv�r Rev%�x► o, f Tj'urlent Crime in Breoktyn Fark a�d .�'raol��'yn Gent`et
A thc�mu�h unders�ding c�f �iie pc�lice departments a�d an examinat�on of the undertying c�uses
and cr�ndi�ions contributing to the recent rise in the violent crime rate are �ssential in developing a�
effective crirne-reduction s�rateg�r. This pmject urill examirae the cities of Broa�klyn Park and
Brooklyn Center, #he natnre and ex#ent of crime in the cities, and e�sting crime prevention
strategies.
PEItF sta�`ers will work wi#h tt�e Broc�ktyn Park and Brooklyn Center Pc�lice Depariments, the
Hennepi� Cow�ty I?istrict Attarney's Qffice, probation and parole agencies, fec�erai agencies and
4�1�5I 1i11j}(1T�1� StSIC�'1�lkp���TS ��I ItiV18W CT13I1P,. 111�O1T[I8�14I1 prosecutia�n and convi�tion da�a, r�levant
infar�matian on time and tacatic�n af incidents, and background data on ar�stees and victims. The
pruject st� v�ill examin� cc�nnections between violent crim� and nar�otics and gang activity.
Im�rtantly, we will be reaching out to officers and camrriu�ity members who re�larly face the
ct�allenges c�f crime in emch jurisdiction. PERF staff will conduct interviews to solicit inf`a�mati�►n
about the currrent crime reductaon strategies, gathering infc�rmation fram officers anci ea�m�nand staff
pezsonn�el in higgli�-crime ar�as, i�avestigators and prosecutors handlin� hc,micide and �ang and drug-
related cases, anc3 prvbatic�nlparole o�'icers.
PERF will �nclude community or�anizations identified by the �roc�klyn Park and Braalclyzx Center
Palice ents in the project, including fa.ith-bas�cl orga�izations, k�y bu.sinesses and residenis
4f the cc�mmunities, PERF s#a�' will help identify tactics that will enct�urage the comrnunity to
work with their police de�artments in addressing the rise in violent crime a com�n�nt ihaat is
crucial t+� #�ue project's success.
PERF wi11 prepare a repc3rt that suanmarizes the findin�s of the analysis. Ba�€ up�on availabie data,
the report wiil includ� such in��armation as violent crime trends, dernographical ir�urniation c�n
vic�lent crirninals �nd victims, c�rnic lacations and persons involved in violent crime, w�apoans c�f
cb:c�ic� us�l in acts c�f vialence; rel�tia�nships, if any, �etw�en gangs aad dru�s with vio�ent crime�
impa�t of dornestic violenc+e on the crime problem; iuxvolv�me�t of,juvenzles in violent crime; and
an inv�ntory of +current and available cc�llaborations with outside a�encies, private and �aa�-pr��it
org�nizatian to de�rease violent t;rime.
Critne Suntmit
Any e�'ect�ve strategy to pr�vent and reduce violent crime must involve the p�oli�ce, the cornmunity
and all criminal justice pautners inciudin$ city, county, state and f�ieral agenci�s an�
communityJinstihh�tional corrections. At the invitation of Claie� Wade Sette�r attd Ghief Scott
�hth4ld� and under the mad+�ration of PERF Executive T}ir�ectvr Chuck Weu��arar, a strategic
xnne�ing c�f �+epreseniaxives &om all major components of the crirr�inka� j�ice sy�#tem and the
ca�uxaunity will be convened �n #he form of a one day 44 t�iolent Criime Sum►txa�#." The m�jor role of
PE1�F Viol�►t C:rime �eductic�n Ini#iative Draft Propvsal for Braoklyn Park and Braoklyn
Center
Page 3
�I, the Swmmit atiendees will 1� to identify the emerging trends, t�e reasans l�hind thes� incre.�ses,
and so�icit the stakehc��ders' comr�utrnent to craR a comprehensive resgonse.
'The surnmit has t�en targ�ted for late 3une af 2007, and will sche�ful�d l�asect c�n the availability
of attendees. A�did assessmeni of the propased strategies is the c�nterpiece af this irutiative.
Holding everyane �ceountable for their perfarmance is vitat to the pro,j�c#'s succ�ss.
The majs�r goal uft�us initia�ive is to deliver a comprehensive crirne-reduction star�.tegy for Brooklyn
Park and Broc�kly� Center. The strengthened parmerships farmed in this prc�ject will be instru�ment�t
ir� c�ivir�g v�iolent crime ciawn. Any success that the project enjoy� v�ill be directly attr'sb�utable to
the com�nit�nent and supgrart of t�e law enforcement and cammiunity stakeholders. At the
conclusion of the Summit, FE�' will provide an addend�m te the report summazizing its key
fi�dings;
The inclu�led Appendix A lists PERF staff projected tu work �n the V►alent +Crfine Reductio�
�nitiative far Brookklyyn Park ��d I3rooklyn Center.
Pro�e�c� "T�meline
PE�' anticipates that the project will r�quire ten weeks to comgl�#e from cuntra�ct signing by al1
�es. The S�nit i� targeted ic� take place during the eigt�th we�k c�f the g�rcyject in late June
20n7, the s�ific date vvill be dependent upon the avaiiability of invitees,
Violent Crime Reduetion� Init�ative tor Brookiyn Park and Brooklyn; Center Timelin�
w��Ii�2���a�s��I7�s0���o
��t'�� 1 I I 1 I I I I
Pre-site Developmemt x� x I 1
��it� v�si�c I l I� I� I I I
I,�ty�►� ��rt 1 I I X x 1� x I I
s�� I I I I C f
Report Addendum of Key
S�at Findings x x
PERF ViQl+�nt Cru�e Reductit�n Initiative Draft Progcrsal #or Brc�kly� Park and Broaklyn
Center
Page 4
Froiect B�tlgct
The pro�►se�d buc�get is pres+�nte+d as a fixed fe�e, all inclusive E�udget. It inctudes PEKF's ic�direct
general and a�r�inistrative cost�s as approued and required l�y the LT.S. De�ra,r�nent crf Justice.
Prbie�ct Admin�t�ration, Liaiso� Bnd�,et Oversi�Lt 24 �1,334
Pha�e t3�,e 3'la�ing and pre-sit� develcrpment activities to m�isrtixe the
usefulness oftime spent on-sit� a# �ach jurisdiction. PERF �'will famitiarize
themselves with the Brc�klyn Park and Broaktyn Center Pcrli� Departments,
�dentify a r�antact person in each agency tv wor4c in parmership a�nd �vocdi�nate wittti,
establish a list of interna�i ancl +external s�akehalders to be int+erviewed, and revie�v
data avaitability and data formats for each deqactment. 58 $3,223
Fhase Two ConcYuciin� a site visit ta the Brooklyn Park and Braoklyn Center
Palice �►epartmeuts. The PERF site tea�m will collect data as welt as ccmduct a
myti�d af interviews with �Cey �mbers of the departrnents, community
representatives, elected officials, and officials from outside a�encies, as w�rranied. 96 $5,335
P�e Tl�r+ee Reviewing, evalaating and analyzing all gather�ct data t� identify
the underlying causatiun and contribu#ors ta viotent crime in Brookly�t Park and
Brool�lyn Center. A r��rt will be ca�npleted outlining the stucly's f�`►dings leadin�
to elem�nts af a: crime-reduciion in`rtiative. 153 $8,5U3
Phas+� Foar-- Th� final phase of the project will convene key Brook�yn Fark and
Brookhym Gentaer staicehc�lders fflr a one�day Summit to share the findin� ofthe
s#udy at�d the proposed stra�gy, and to develop a crime reduction initiative th�t
att�ndees can cornmit to and s��part. Summit comments and fi�dings wxl! be
�n rated int� t�e �'it�al re rt. 63 $3 Stf 1
Total Hours 394
PERF Ferso�mel Cos�.s Inc[udin� Salaty �nd Frin,�e Bene�ts $21,896
Other LL�ir�ct Costs $1,15U
Exp+�nses ineludin� Travel and t�er diem .$5,�4p
PERF c�v�rh�ad c�r es authoriz�d and uired b the U.S. De ent afJustice �14 53S
P��' "V�c�lent �Crime Reduction Irutiative Draft Proposal far Bmcak�yn �'ark and �3rvok�yn
C�n►ter
Page 5
APPENDI�
PERF Praject Team
Chutck Wea�ter, apP4intet� as the �x�cutive Director of the Police Executive Research Forum (FER�'}
in I�9�, leads a st� engag,ed in �rlice and criminal j ustice research, mar���ement s�tudi�s ancl
cc�nsultin�, Publication of research findings, technical assistara��, d�monstration proj�cts, and �xecu�ive
deveiopment and selection. PERF is a�nemt�ership orgaruization of law enf`c�rc�ment chie�s from fhe
Iarger police ageneies in th� cauntry. Tt was faunded more th�n a quarter century ago by a number of
chiefs who savv a�e�d for an t�rganizataon dcdic�ted to pragressive thinkin� abaut difficult issues in
policing,
Duiing his t�nure at PERF, Wexler has been directly in�ralved in numemus technical assistance,
r�azvch and cnnsuliing prajects to impmve the deliveiy of p�Iiee servic�s. E�amples t�f major pcojects
include his work coc�rdinating the develvpment and implementatiic�n af a ca�prehensive a�#i-crime
strategy in Miru�eeapc�lis that is now a model far pubtic-grivate ccmperation. He has spearh�d an
effort to candidly confront and discuss police-miaority conflict and tt�e contrc�versy concerning raciai
prcffilin�, resu]ting in a nativnal meeting af major city chiefs a�+d loc�l leasiers. H� currently is inv�lved
in major projects in Chicago; Kansas City; Los Angeles; Kirt�ston, Jamaica; and the A+�%ddle F„ast. In
each of these projects his purpose is ta more efficiently deliver galicir�g services t� the comrnun�iy. He
h�s �n involved in PERF's analysis of the investigation into tZr� VVashi�gtan sniper incidents,
s�ing as co-author of PE�tF`s repnrt, A�Ianaging Multijurisdictic�n�l Gases: Lessons Learned frvm ,tl�e
Srriper Irr�vestigaiion.
Pnvr tc� jouai�ig PERF, �Vexler worked as an assistant to the nation's first �irectc,�r of the f3f�iee of
Natic►a�al, A�ruu� Ct�ntral I'oli�c�, where he identifie,d exemp�ary 1c�ca1 init�atives axad belpeci craf� national
pt�licy, He also head�d the Prr��essiorzal Develogment I3ivisian �fthe �Citernatic�nat Assraciat�c�n of
Chiefs nf Foliee, where desig�ed a national program for the selectian c�f police chiefs �nid revamped
and broaden+�d ex�cut�ve development programs far pcflice �xecutives,
A native 4f Bost�n, We�er heid a number of key pasi�ions in t�e aoston Police D�pa�rtment. As
Qperations Assistant to the Police Commissioner, he played a centrat rol� in the �gency's m�nagemment
of raci�l violence in t�e wake of caurt-ordered desegregation of the Bc�ston Sc�� System. �e was
aiso ins�menial in the d+�velopment and maiaagement of the Cammunity �isc�rders Unit, wl�ich
eatned niastional reputation for su�cessfully prosecutin� and pr�ventin� r�cially motivated crime.
Weatl�r serves as an evaluatox for the Ford Foundation's Innc�vativns in Gt�vemment Pr4je.ct.
""4�e�er �aat�d fra�m Baston University with a liberal arts degree. He e�rned a master's degz�ee in
cri�minolc��y ftorn Fi�rrida St�te t3niversity and a Ph.D. in urban studzes and pl�n� from the
M�achus�tts i�itute �f Technc�lagY (MI'T'). He has been an instnxct�ar at Bc�wdoin Gotlege and MIT.
i'ERF Vi�alent �r�izne k�eductio� Initiative Draft Proposal for Bresoklyn �'ark and Broak�yn
Center
Page 6
Bill Tegeler rece��y retired as a commander with the Santa Ana Pc�liee 17epartment in Southern
Califurt�a to b�come I'ERF's Deputy l�irectar of Maaagemen# Senrices and is cucr+es�tly thie Actiug
Director Acting of PERF's Cent�r on Force Accountability. �e pvss�sses a Bacheivr of Art.s I?egree
in Criminal 3ustice f�m Galifornia State University, Full�rton and a Master's Degree in Hwnan
I�esour�es and Organiza�ional Deveiapment &om the University of San Francisco.
During his car�er in Sattta Ar� Comm�nder Tegeler was assigned to superv�se the c�epactme�et's
Plaz�ning and Res��rrcch Unit and s�rved as Administrative Assist�nt tu the C1�ef of Police, where he
co-develop�d and administered tlae Ivlayar's Task Force on Neighbc�nc�xrd Policing. 8�11 was selected to
command Santa Ana's Developmental Policing District (UPD) and was respansible for the
management of all a�pe�cts af paticing in the decentralized DPD t1�°ough the developm�nt and
implementatitrn of Problem Qriented Policing. He also carnrnanded the Investigatiam Bureau's Crime�
Agaittst Persvns Divisic�n, where he was res�nsible for r�anaging the Hc�micide Sectio�a, Gaa�g U�it,
Juv�nil� Section aud Sexual �ssault Section, integrating a Community 4riented Palicing philosophy,
Commander Te�eler's work has received natianal, state and t�c�l palicing awa�.
Bill has pruvid�d trainung and cc�nsultation on the irnplernenta�ic�n af Comrnunity Qrie�.ted Policing to
police ex�cuutives throughout America and abroad. He h�►s �Iso cc�nductesi several ar�izatianal
assessments o��nwaici��1 and county la�v enforcement agencies for the �alifar�aia Comtn�s�si4n of
Pea+�e Ufficers Staz�dards and TraininB Cl'US'T�-
Bru�ee Taylor, Ph,D., is the L?irectvr of Res�arch for tlie Folice Execut�ve R�search Farum (FERF}.
I3r. Tayl�r l�s 1 S years c�f grofessianal experience in research design, randomiz+ed field ex�riments,
statistical a�alysis� measurernent, survey design, and pragram ev�J;ua�on. Ur. Taylor has s s�ron�
background in res�arch methods, iu�cluding: applied research anc! pragram evaluatinn, qualitative data
analysis, descript�v+� data analysis, and �nultivariate models. His w�ar� has irtcluded the d�velopment
and use of a vaziety of sampling plans, �xperimental and q�si-exp�rimental designs, cross=_sectional
ancl Iongitudinat desigr�s, questiannair� design, scaling routines, pi�lin�/sampte size ana►lyses, and
prc�ce�iures tc� track hard-tc�-fnd populations in longitudinai stuc�ies. He has conducted and su�ruised
re�earch projects using these techniques for federal, state and lc�cal governments, private fow�tions, a
victim servic�s �rga�nization in New York City, and the New J�y cc�urt system. Before jo�ning
PERF, Dr. Taylor w�s s Manag�ng Assc�ciate at Caliber Assaciates, the Ueputy Directar of the
Arrestee Drug Abt�se Mc�nitorang (ADAM) prograrn at tlie Itilational Institute of Justice, and Seni4r
Associatt� w�th the New Yark City Victim Serviees Agency.
Craig Fisch+er joined FERF in 3anuaiy 2007 as senior editc�r. F'reviously kte r�v€�rked at I,�tt�ar
Pu�lications, where h� edited Criminal Justice Newsletter and othe� periodica�s cov news and
palicy issues in taw enforcement, corrections, juvenile justice, and related fielcls, H� a]sa ha� warked at
the AFI�-C�p, the Nat�onai Safety Council, and other organizations, w�iea�e he wrate and �dit�i
PERF Violent Crime Reduction Tnitia�ve Draft Proposal far Brc�akiyn Park and B�klyn
Center
Page 7
publicatic�ns on labc�r Iegisla�ic��, workplace safety and hea�th, �ad other mat#�rs. Graig hol+� a
bacheior�s r�egree in journalism from the University of Illineis at LJrbana-Cl�cnpai�n.
w rked �t PERF for ei t ears
Cratg Fraser, Ph.D., duects PERF' s Management Studies �raug. He o gh Y
t�fore leaving to direct t�ie Public 5afety practice area fcn MAXIMUS, Inc in January 2003. He
re�urned to l'ERF in June 20U5. Prior to his initial job at P�RF he helc� a jc�int position as DirectQr caf
Trainin�, Riclsmo�d Police I3eparl�nen# and Director of the GriminologylCrimity�l Justice Prvgra�n,
Virginia UniQn U�:iversity. He has w�rked as Planning and Budget Manager far the San#a Ana,
�alifornia �crlice Department; as Director, Training, Education, �nd Accreditation Division Fc�r the
Massachusetts Metropolit�an Police; and Director, Management Tnfc�rmation I3iwisit�n, Winstc�n-S�1em,
N.C. Police Degartrnen#. Additionatly he has held appointmenis at Bc>stan University, Flc�rida "tate
University, Washburn University, and the University af Kansas.
F��as+er has manaig;ed over UO studies of police agencies and operations in both Iazge a�id small
a�encies over the last twelve years. His experience includes: campreh�nsive g�mme�t surveys,
performance audits, and or�anizational studies; resource allcacatioan studies, warl�load assessments, and
beat piac�ning; productivity analysis and improvement re,com�endations; a�ss�ssmeats af technQlogy
and ��xomatidn �eeds, RFP development and assistance with vendor s�ie+ctian; ar�anizatio�at climate
revi�w and ox�anizational deve�opmeant planning; core grcNCCess identificatic�n and process mappisig;
strate,�ic piannin� assis=tance; and development of law enfor�emez�t brai�ning a�d leadership programs.
He has been a#'�culty member far the Florida Departmeant af Law Enforcement in the C�nal Justice
Executiv� tn.sti�ut� fc�r the la�t 14 years �nd also was an a member oF PERF's faculty for tlae Ser�ior
Nias��agement Institute fc�r Pvlice.
Kr�stin I�ppelrmt��, M.A., joined the PERF staff as a Research As�aciate in March 2006. Ptiar to
jc�' PERF, �rls. Kap�Iman xnternecl with the Drug Enforcement Ad�uistrration (I3EA) in �he
(}ffi� of Diversic�n Co�trol. She received her Bachelox of Ar�S Ho�c�rs degree in Psychology a�d
Griminal Justice from #he University of Wiscc�nsin-Milwaukee in May 2fl04. Ms. Kappelman �atned
her A��ster's d��ree in For�nsic �'sychvlagy from Mazymount Univerrsity in �lrling�on, Virginia in
T?�mber vf 2005.
Cbuck Lit��rd �s a fellow wit� FERF's Management Services Grc�ug �t4 iS C8�?�81A 4� �3� Stlj?pOT't
S�rv�c�s Unit with the Gastonia Police Department, North Car�olinar, ��rtain �if��ard is respc�nsibl� for
the operation Qf the Trairiing Uni�, Bu�.get, Building Vehicte Maintenance, Gran:t Fi�anci.a;fi
Management and tl�e Pra�rky Rflom. Sorne of Captain Liffc�rd's previous a�signments include Patrol
Team Captai.n, ABC Enfarr.err}er�t Qfficer, Patrol Sergeant� Cc�mmunications and Records Sex�eant,
a�ad Patrol t?fFicer, He hold� a Master's Degree in Criminal Justice ftom the Univ�rsity of Not�1a
Caralina, Ch�.rloite and a Bachelor's degree in History from Uavidsc�n CoI�ege.
PERF'ViQ}ean►t Crime Reduction Inait�ative Draft Praposal fc�r BroQklyn Park and Brcwklyn
Center
Page 8
MiNUTES f)F THE PRlJCEEDINGS Cl�` THE C�TY C4UNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOI�LYN CEN'TER.
IN T'H'E COUNTY OF HE�€��iEP�IN ANU
TH� STATE OF MINNESOTA
JOTNT MEE1'11�3G of BR�t3KLYN CENTER and BRt�UT�LYN PARK CIT'Y COUNCILS
APRIL 30, 2007
C4UNCIL/COMMISSION CONFERENCE RC�OM
CALL T4 ORDER
The Brooklyn Ce�ate�r C�ty C�uncil met in a Joint M�tin� with tl�e Brnc►klyn I'ark City Caun�il
�t City �iali called to arder bX Mayor Tim Willson at 6:40 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Niayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Kay Lasmani, Mary 4'Cannor, Dkar� Ryac�, and Mark
Yelich. Alsc� present were Gity Manager Curt Boganey, Cammunity Activi�i�s RecreatiQn and
Services (�ARS) Director Jim Glasoe, Palice Chief Scott Bechthald, anr� D�puty City Clerk
�arnill� Worley.
Brcwklyn Park metnbers present were Mayar Steve Lampi, Cc�uncilmem�rs Rich Gates, Terry
Gearin, Jeff Lunde, J�anett� Ivieyer, h�Iark Mata, and Mike Trep�nier. Alsc� pr�sent were City
Mana�er Ik3ug Reeder, Poliee Chief Wade Setter, and City Engineer Gary Brov4m.
INTR4DUCTIONS
UPENING REMA►�tI{�
M�y�r Tim Willson s�ated t�is meeting was a good opportux�ity tc� m��t Coe�ci�ne�nbers from
our sister city and build u�n and move farwazd with some of the shared issues.
Mayor Steve Laznpi thanked the City for hosting the event, He stated b€7th cities sl�are common
prflblems, challen�es, and goals and he hopes that this meeting will help to start jc�int efforts.
DISCUSSIUN ITEM�
RE�ItEATIONAL SER"�'ICES
CA�� I}ire+ctor Jim Glasoe stated he would like ta glant a se�d re�arding pr�svidi�►$ more
services, adding value tu tax dollars, and exceeding the expectations of t�cpay�rs. He said that
last fali there was discussic�n amongst the cities of Broc�lclyn C+enter, Brc>aklyn Fazk, �nd i'�Iew
Hope reiatir�� to the par-t�� gotf courses and possibly creating a pass allowing residents of
Braoklyn Cer�ter, Broaklyn Fark, and New Hope to use all thr�e par-three gc�lf cours�s for one
price,
04/3UIU7 -1- �R14F'T
�vir, G�asoe proposed that both ci#ies rnazket and promc�te the use of the Sroaklyn Genter aqux�tics
facility and ih�e Brpoktyn Park ice facility. He discussed ways through ccc�i�aperatian to exceed the
val�e expec#atic�ns of taacpayers. He stated jaint rnarketing would be an option r�lort� with
allowing residentt� ta register fs�r joint prograrns at both Brooklyn Center attd Brooklyn Park
faciliiies. He discussed th� It's .�our Summer! brochure that is a joint activities 1'€stiz�g with
Broc�kl� C�nter Brooklyn Park, and Qssea School I3istrict Nc�. 279. He stated t�iere are
II number of simiilarities betvveen pragrams offered in Brootclyn Center and pro�ra�ms offered in
Bro�okiyn Park.
Discussions w�re held regarding the following: l) cc�mmc�n o�rations ainongst the cities and
vuhether ar not fut�re discussioras woutd continue, 2) �hether other schc�c�l di�i�icts were
collabarating with cities to produce a joint activities brachure; 3) praviding the apportunity fa�r
re.�idents from ba� cities to have activities and prc>grams avai�able tc� them from both cities
I wau�d provide added value and c�ffer something to residents that is unique arad extrac�rdinary; 4)
p�aoling af rescsurces is a gQOd plan and the cities sh+�uld expic�re sirnilar efforts with the City of
Crystal and ot�er neighbaring cities; S) activities offered by bt>th cities and v�rh�ther there was
overlap c�f sc+me pro�;rams; b) cc�Ilabarative efforts have been suc�cessful in oth�r ciries; and
�ssibly combinin� Park and Recreation Departments at both ci#ies to eliminat� dupticate staff
and prograrns.
I�TIGHWAY 252 IMPItfJ'�NtENTS
Broak�yn �'ark City En�ineer Gra�y Brown distributed maps c�f kiiglaway 252 and discussed
adding a� additionat lane sotrthbound from Brookdale I}rive to 73rd Avenue to inc�ase capacity
when the light is �reen an�d reducing commute time. He stated eoncrete xned�ans, catch bas�ns,
ar�d storm sewers will be needed. He discussed conversatic�ns with Mn/�C}T tQ review the entire
corridor anti impacts of closing �ntersections at Humboldt Ave auid 8I st Avenc�e. He discussed
txaffi� statistics of the area a�d e�cisting peak volumes. He stated an of�'icial traffic study has not
b�en cnmpleted; hawever, State Ufficials were interested in th+� pro�sal, He stated the Iights
wou�d be removed at the cl�ssed intersections and discuss�d a trial period He diseussed the
peciestrian traf�ic at '73rd Av�. He stated Mn/DOT has indicatec� that Fiighway 2S2 wauld be
review�d as a possibte fr�eway in 20 to 2S years.
It was the majt�rity consensus c�#' both City Counci!'s to cc�ntinue tc� study the t�ptions for
Highway 252.
Mr, Bt�ganey stat� he would be more comfortable with the propo�ed imprc�vements after
fe�dback is received fr+om the traffic engineer.
CFtINiE REDUCTI4N PI�OPUSAL
Brooklyn Center Pc�iice Chief Scatt �echthold presented a prapc�sal for Crime Reduction
Strategy assernbled by the Potice Executive Research Fc�rum (PERF}. He discussed L�e
following four phases:
(34l�U/Q'7 -2- I3RAFT
1. PERF staff wi11 become familiaz with the cities o� Brooklyn Park and Ptratrkiyn Center
and their palice deparlments, as well as the scape af the vic�Ient crime problem in the two
cc33mmunities. This will be accomplished thrrrugh an analysis �f open-research materials
as well as infc�rmation pravided by the cities.
2. F'ERF wi11 conduct a site visit ta Braoklyn Park and Brookl}m Center. Additior�al data
will be callected, and the PERF team will canduct a series of intexviews with key
members of the pc�lice departments, the citi�s' eommunity leaders, an�i c�fficiais
representing pertinent criminal justice agencies.
3, A detaileci ana�lysis of available viotent crirne infarmatic�n will be canducted for bath
ci�ie�. A clear unde�ding of the sc�pe af the problem will be deveto�d, including an
a�ssessrnent c�f current �rime prevention and reductian strategi�s employed by the
departments. Underlying conditions and other factors outside of the �alic� dep�rtxnents
cantributing to violent crime in the eities will aiso be identified. This thorough
�valuation will lead to the develapment of a comprehensive crime reduction initiative.
4, PERF will gathe� essential �takeholders to attend a one-day Crime Summit to eva�uat�
the propc�sed criane-reduction strategies, Participants will cr�me to��tt��r to cultivate a
comrnc�n understanding of the vic�lent erime pmble�n in Brc�vklyn Park anc� Br�oklya
Center. The 5urnmit will lead to the development af an intervention to reduce violent
crime and disorder in th� communities, which attend�es can suppQrt and camrnit
ct�..�mselrres to implementing.
H� diseussed the fundir�g of the proposal and state+d the total cost is $44,3$l. He stated the
proposed cost sharin� wc�uld result in res}�onsibility of $29,588 for Brooklyn Park and $14,793
fc�a Brooklyn Center.
Br+�oklyn Fark Police Chief Wade Setter discussed �he rise of vioient crimes in bc�th
cc�mmuniti�s, He stated Brooklyn Fark savv a 92% rise in robberies and Bro�oklyz�: Cer�te� saw a
44% rise in rs�b�ries last year, He discussed trends from �re�und the cv�ntry and zeiated them to
the twa c+�mmuniti�s.
Discussians were h�ld regarding the commwuties moving f�rwart� with the proposal; the
impQrtance of bencl�ma�rks to gau$e if the proposed action is workirtg; anc� possibly i.ncluding
housing g4licies in the study.
ADJUURNMENT
Counci�rnember Lasman moved and Councilmember O'Connor secontl�d a+djc�urnment of the
meet%ng at 6:55 p.m,
Mc�t�c�n passsed �nanimaus�y.
04I30/U7 -3- URAFT
AGENDA
CITY COUNCILBCONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WORK SESSION
May 14, 2007
Immediately Following Regular City Council and EDA Meetings Which Start at 7:00 P.M.
City Council Chambers
A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is
located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary.
ACTIVE DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Social Service Presenta.tions City Manager
a. Community Mediation Services Beth Bailey Allen 30 Minutes
b. Five Cities Senior Transportation Rita Debruyn 30 Minutes
2. Ratio of Non-Porous to Porous Surface Area with New Construction 30 Minutes
3. Joint Meeting City of Crystal Tentative Date May 29th 6 p.m. 15 Minutes
4. Special Work Session Meeting May 21 I-694/Hwy 100 10 Minutes
Pending List for Future Work Sessions
Date Undetermined
1. Social Service Presentations City Manager
a. Project Peace
b. Reach for Resources
2. Residential Home Inspection Point-Of-Sale Ordinance (following Housing Commission
Review)
3. EBHC Water Tower Repairs City Manager
4. Review Council Travel Policy Budget Work Session
5. City Manager Performance Review Format and Procedure City Manager
6. Farmers Market City Council
7. 2011 Brooklyn Center Celebration City Council
a
x y k.
A �y t k :r r
2 Y4 t Y{
'x A
2
t
i
,,a. X x te u zx. t t
r i
a €t
y g y
*.,k y.v k "^a '4� u.'. `4. `a..�c
1
#w .k' 's" d v J? c t
�i,
4x�
J4 v y
N. 4 i�` a
y L '�a� �'�s
F
4
f G f f h f k
J
f s 5 r `s�z�.
r
t i z� F
f t `.1�. `:,�4
E�
S
L r a
v
xi ','r 2 a
r 1
4 �a r s `YX� i,. t
k
f'� x .s
x a 3 �;5,:�
v 4': k
t
'n f k
X "3
�^L� t k �s Ax�c.. �Y
'v k. F
C y. i fi S� A
y x, t± h.
j
t k�, y�,`��' �5�.
Y;," .d�f�; S* t SE S
s r �5 i,L 'i�� .�;YLq .M
t t v
i
S �.S `�'f
y P
H
4 j a M r c� z y:;
4r5i�" t{ I
5 f �x k y.+t
t
�n
s?
fin` l'k 1�. k�.
'i z"> l f A k t
�4 `N*'��`�+. 'a
t
I
f 1i.3 e'
�n �•v\
g
,.t k
h t3 e +F+G
b
a �s
r r ra t:
N'
c x t a e t z t
�v
j a 3
a t� s
§fi' F
4
L �'.5� .''e f �f
t
F
l a Y,�',� �q,K
X
5 h
4
4
F
Y,
iv{
f
t
f :�+.t rv'�
�t.� (st.
c
s«
..l h 4 'i*
l
.'?T fi Y
r
�s a
r
a
u.g; �a..k�' t a I
s
fi lp t
a J z:�: g: r rv 3 t ��6
.i .i f
A, t 1 u
x y P .4� 3 h 1*
t
I i
i 3 j ::Tk'.` d Y' f `^y
`v t
d
I '`�v f S Y 2
R T
e� "�Yv `4.
K �.y 'n t
y
�L F
y r t d `�r
��1
u s �v r�.
:�.,a< s�. s
f j
k t t 4
2.,yy� k+� 1
r
F
f' fi
l z.
k x
4 *.v f 5 S.'� 1 a S
t r r x
t
^z^•
S j fi
t
4 `4. F 'a
t ,y
S'' a
n
b�
Y k f
`E.. 3 l �.3,
Y
t
k x
.,�£A�� t f W
y, Y.A �`u 3v
b P Y S
'E 4 G
t 'jt y
t 4. n
4
k'�' 4 w
S�
r ��s v
'a '�TM� f� i
r
r
y x
.............e�... ..�.r...�_ ^�,�.._,..w .w............" .w.a..w.w.....0 n._._.x..s.....
There are no materials for this item.
4 f F ,w
r
Z
v 7 �'v.
y i d t I
t t
e 4
.a.
l f u +Y
4 Y .k
7
t:
R"� y� /i' ;�.,x+
f i
t
t
S^ y'. f `z �l
�4 'n' 'µ+4
�3 J$
t y t�.. g
Y Y f ,k
r 5 S z+'v°y
y vA 1
9
u t 2 N� k �.n';
z
E .1 a'
Y
i M 1 Y
r. s ra
j x. �5 �,a
x
A z.=..� ���.,''a'm' k'.
�z:. s� t
a.� s :s 3 1���'>� �r �,y
f
3 I a
d
x-.. "Y y'
r ev.: l�
t
M' �5�' �'t�`�'S v.
e
s yr:�
�S F m
t
s
3 3.' Y
S 1 �h
Z F S
2 z
l
f i fl� d.
R l �'.a.; J 4 x� y
y ,t 3 X
1
r
J }v,.�
Y S k
f k
x
t x �:t
t
:C k '3
fi
X i h
f
k t 4 'rz
T. b Y l�. K� S`�'�+�,
t Z v� +3
f ��a��' A���� 1P S
���ti����+�' ��"��j�� �*��q�� ^t
S* 'i I
l
y f
f
E. h
m
v
u.h
x
.s w
r 2 x t
u
s 'z
rl
I 'u K.
P
;4 A
+w.*. t
2
3.
�.a ��t
1
h y
4 k C
`1 S
2'
f�
a S m' n
t
aa
t x
t 't �5
a
t k
�3
�i
a m
i
x r
r
a
A �4. E. f
t i t S
f
�il t 3
s T w E'
t
f 4
��`v 4 9.^
3
e, c
fi
s a x t ae
$f
f e. 'f
J
5•
f
Y� tr f
S 4 k- k 4 4 v, `3 `a
'v.
E 4
a:,�,
x .•s r� x., i
e'�` t v'"' 1 b�
'C f t S k��', .'..c n
t t
f t
y
{i"l
k
i� 5"
T A R
k
2 S 4�.
W
�Y
r ry� x 1 y
�i f
y
2
3 Y u
f l
�...;.4 ro A
y 3,
t
y
.....ww.v ....:........<..,..v. .�>...u.v e ...t.... ..e.........v.... L.v..............�� ���«y� �iy u�.. .w.x.�ti. .���u.. .........a......�...,
i
i
GOUNCIL ITEM MEMO�ttANDUM
T4: Curt Baganey, City Manager 1
1
FROrVI: Sharon Knutsan, City Clerk �_�bU�,,.
DATEz May 9, 2407
SUBJEC'Ts Lacal Water Management Plan
At its April 23, 2Q07, Work Session, the City Council ta:bled the discussion Item Nd. 4, Ratio of
Nfln-Pc�rous to Porous Surface Area with New Constructian, ta the May 14, 2047, Work Session.
The Local Water Management Plan was distributed to Cauncil Mernbers with the April 23, 2007,
agenda. Council Members should bring the Plan with them to the May 14 meeting. The Plan
will be included in the electronic packet.
City of Brvvklyn Center
A Millennium Cornmunity
MEMOitANDUM
DATE: April 18, 2(307
Tp: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Todd Blomstrom, Director of Public Wvrks
I 5i1gJECT: Storm Water Management Practices Relat�d ta Non-Porous Surfaces in New
Develapment Projects
pn August 14, 2fl06 the City Cauncil adopted a revised Local Starm Water Management Plan
for the City of Braoklyn Center. The purpose of this document is ta serve as a camprehensive
planning tc�41 to guide the City in conserving, protecting, and managing local surface water
resvurees. The Local Storm Water Managemcxit Flan provides a su�mary af the minimum
design statiidards gaveming storm water management far new develapment and redevelQPment
at
prajects within Brvoklyn Center.
ontains standards for managing storm water runoff generated from impervious
The plan c
surfaces that are cvnstructed as part of land developrnent projects. Appendix A of the plan
establishes required management practices for controlling increased ninaff ra#es frflm impervivus
surfa�es, water quality trea#ment to mitigate increased levels of poliution generated from
impervious surfaces, and infiltration requircmcnts to mitigate increased volumes of runoff
generateti frorn impervious surfaces.
Copies of the Local Storm Water Management Plan were provided ta the City Council prior to
adoption of the plan, Three additional copies of the Lacal Storm Wat�r Manag�ment Plan are
atta,ch�d to this mem:c�randum for distribution to the nevv members of the Ciry Council.
n and Cvmmunity Center Pltipne TDD Number
63(11 Sh.ingle Creek Parkway Recreaiw
Brooklyn Center, MN 5543t1-2199 (763) 569-34(}0
City Hall TDD Number {763} 569-3300 Ff3X (763) 569-3434
FAX (?63) 569-3494
www. cityofbrooklyncenter.org
I
City of Bruuklyrr Center
A greal ntacr lo s/ur1. A grc a!, place Io sluy.
i
.-t� m ,.d..
4.:"
i
r
-r:r,►
�-.p.a.«:_'
,h-�. f" r
-a_
f a�` t� J tl r r t a�,< a. z r E
w :A a+�'�� .*1'�Mi y f
'rte `W 1"- r.� 1r �e a. s,.a1 y °M¢� r
ot:.
4
i
'ti q
�Ww��`��y, 1Ga
..I�
..r-
•4 t 'Y T
�!a 0 t
t;i° a c� 4 �1 Y
�.�.��_�r..�.{`�.
P�� y
C w
=�a�
i
jUNE 2006
Bonestroo
Rosene
Anderlik
Associates
Engineers fi Architects
Bonestroo z335 Wes[ Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113
0 Rosene Office: G51-G36-4600 Fax: 651-G36-1311
Anderlilc www.bonestroo.com
Associates
Engineers Architects
June 28, 2006
Todd Blomstrom, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer I
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Re: Brooklyn Center Local Water Management Plan
BRA File No. 000412-05101-0
Dear Todd:
Transmitted herewith is the final report for the Local Water Management Plan for the
City of Brooklyn Center. This plan meets the requirements listed under Minnesota
Statute 103B, Minnesota Rules 8410, and applicable watershed district rules.
The LWMP incorporates comments from watersheds, the Metropolitan Council, and City
Staff.
We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this interesting and important project.
If you have any questions regarding the report, please contact me at 651-604-4820.
Sincerely,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
�l�
Daniet J. Edgerton, P.E.
St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester. MN Milwaukee, WI Chicago, IL
A/firmativt Action/Equal OpportuNty Emplvyer and Employee Owned
i
I
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION I I
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
Registered Engineer under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
Daniel J. Edgerton`�.E.
Date: Reg. No. 19206 I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents i
Executive Summary iv
1. Introduction 1-1
1.1 Background 1-1
1.2 Purpose and Scope 1-1
1.3 Organization 1-4
2. Land and Water Resource Inventory 2-1
2.1 Land Use 2-1
2.2 Topography and Watersheds 2-4
2.3 Soils 2-4
2.4 Key Water Resources 2-6
2.4.1 Lakes and Ponds 2
2.4.2 Rivers and Creeks 2-9
2.4.3 Wetlands 2-9
2.5 Existing Flood Insurance Studies 2-9
3. Goals and Policies 3-1
3.1 Purpose 3-1
3.2 Background 3-1
3.3 City of Brooklyn Center LWMP Goals and Policies 3-1
3.4 Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management
Commissions Second Generation Watershed Management Plan
Goals and Policies 3-4
3.5 County, State and Federal Agency Jurisdiction 3-6
3.5.1 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 3-6
3.5.2 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 3-7
3.5.3 Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) 3-8
3.5.4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 3-8
3.5.5 Environmental Protection Agency 3-g
3.5.6 Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed
Management Commissions 3-9
3.5.7 State and Federal Jurisdictional Boundaries for Public
Wetlands and Waters 3-9
3.5.8 Hennepin County 3-9
3.5.9 Metropolitan Council 3-9
3.6 Water Resource Management-related Agreements 3-12
3.7 Impacts of the Brooklyn Center LWMP on other Units of
Government 3-12
3.8 Watershed Rules and Standards that Affect the City of
Brooklyn Center 3-12
City of Brooklyn Center
Local Water Management Plan
4. System Assessment 4-1
4.1 General 4-1
4.2 System Description 4-1
4.2.1 West Mississippi Watershed 4-1
4.2.2 Shingle Creek Watershed 4-1
4.3 System Assessment 4-3
4.3.1 City Assessments 4-3
4.3.1.1 1996 WMP 4-3
4.3.1.2 Twin Lakes Management Plan 4-3
4.3.2 Watershed Assessments 4-4
4.3.2.1 Water Quantity 4-4
4.3.2.2 Water Quality 4-5
4.3.2.3 Shingle Creek Channel Assessment 4-6
4.3.2.4 Groundwater Resources 4-6
4.3.3 Clean Water Act Assessments 4-6
4.3.3.1 Chloride TMDL Report for Shingle Creek 4-8
4.3.3.2 Nutrient TMDL Report for Twin Lakes 4-8
5. Implementation Plan 5-1
5.1 General 5-1
5.2 NPDES Permit 5-1
5.3 Operation and Maintenance 5-2
5.3.1 Activities 5-2
5.3.2 Stormwater Basins 5-3
5.3.3 Sump Manholes and Sump Catch Basms 5-4
5.3.4 Storm Sewer Inlet Structures 5-4
5.3.5 Open Channels and Ravines 5-4
5.3.6 Piping System 5-5
5.3.7 De-Icing Practices 5-5
5.3.8 Street Sweeping 5-6
5.3.9 Detection of Illicit Connections 5-6
5.4 Implementation Priorities and Programs 5-6
5.4.1 Water Quantity Problems 5-7
5.4.2 SWPPP Priorities 5-g
5.4.3 SCWM WMC Second Generation Watershed
Management Plan Requirements 5-g
5.5 Financing 5-g
5.6 Amendment Procedures 5-10
6. Summary and Recommendations 6-1
6.1 Summary 6-1
6.2 Recommendations 6-2
App endices
Appendix A Minimum Engineering Standards for Stormwater Conveyance and Management
City of Brooklyn Center ii
Local Water Management Plan
Fi�ures
Figure 1 Project Location 1-2
Figure 2 Land Use Pattern, 1996 2-2
Figure 3 Land Use Plan 2-3
Figure 4 Watershed Boundaries 2-5
Figure 5 Public Waters: Water Basin 3-10
Figure 6 Public Waters: Water Course 3-11
Figure 7 Priority Wetlands for Functions and Values Assessments:
Brooklyn Center 5-9
Maps
Map 1 Surface Water System Back of Report
Map 2 Stormwater Pond Locations Back of Report
Tables
Table 2.1 Soil Drainage Characteristics 2-6
Table 2.2 DNR Public Waters 2-�
Table 2.3 Lake and Pond Classifications 2-g
Table 3.1 Summary of Design Standards and Criteria for
Shingle Creek/West Mississippi Watershed Management
Commission and the City of Brooklyn Center 3-13 I
Table 41 Lake Water Quality Attributes 4-5
Table 4.2 303(d) 2004 Final List of Impaired Waters within the City
of Brooklyn Center 4-
Table 5.1 Implementation Priorities 5
I
I
City ofBrooklyn Center lii
Local Water Management Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Local Water Management Plan (LWMP) was prepared in response to the requirements of
Minnesota statues 8410 and 103B.235 as well as the standards set forth by the Shingle Creek and
West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions (SCWM WMC).
The Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions adopted a
Second Generation Watershed Management Plan on May 13, 2004. Member cities are required
to update their Local Water Management Plans to be in compliance with the Watersheds' Second
Generation Watershed Management Plan within two years.
The purpose of this document is to provide the City of Brooklyn Center with an updated LWMP
in accordance with the requirements noted above. The LWMP will serve as a comprehensive
planning document to guide the City in conserving, protecting, and managing local surface water
resources.
Local plans must be submitted to the Metropolitan Council and the watershed organizations for
review. The watersheds have a 60 day review period upon receipt of the local plan. The
Metropolitan Council has 45 days to provide comments to the watershed organizations regarding
the revised local water management plan.
Based on the guidance provided by the Brooklyn Center City council and staff, this report
addresses the City's current water management needs and provides a framework for successful
implementation of a comprehensive stormwater management program.
The report is organized as follows:
Section 2- Land and Water Resource Inventory, describes the physical environment
including watersheds and drainage patterns, dominant land uses, and significant water
bodies within the City.
Section 3- Goals and Policies, lists the City's goals and policies along with public agency
requirements affecting surface water management in the City.
Section 4- System Assessment, describes the existing stormwater management system in
the City and details the various assessments of problems in the existing system.
Section 5- Implementation Plan, covers regulatory responsibilities, priority
implementation items, operation and maintenance, and financing considerations. A Plan
amendment process is also identified.
Section 6- Summary and Recommendations, contains a summary of the LWMP and
makes recommendations for implementing the Plan.
Ciry of Brooklyn Center tv
Local Water Management Plan
The Goals and Policies section of the LWMP (Section 3) outlines goals and policies specific to
water management in Brooklyn Center and its environs. The goals are broad statements
regarding the motivation and intent of the LWMP. The policies that follow the individual goals
are specific requirements that promote attainment of the goal.
The primary goal of Brooklyn Center's LWMP is to bring the City into statutory compliance and
provide the City a framework for effective stormwater management primarily to guide
redevelopment activities but also as a guide for identifying and implementing retrofits to the
existing system. These retrofits consist of both projects and programs. Additionally, the plan
provides clear guidance on how Brooklyn Center intends to manage surface water in terms of
both quantity and quality.
The System Assessment (Section 4) serves two functions. The system description portion of this
section describes the City's surface water management system. This system is shown on Map 1.
The system assessment portion catalogues the various assessments of problems that the Plan
must address. These assessments come from the City, the watershed organizations, and the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The intent is to identify the source of problems
and specific actions the City proposes to take to address these problems either independently or
in collaboration with some other organization most commonly one of the watershed
organizations.
The Implementation Plan of the Brooklyn Center LWMP (Section 5) describes those activities
and programs the City might develop toward improving its surface water management program.
Since Brooklyn Center is largely developed, capital outlays for the trunk sewer system have I
already occurred so future outlays will be for upgrades and replacement. Typically, costs for
upgrades and replacement would be borne by either the stormwater utility fund or would be
recovered through direct special assessment.
Section 5 also includes:
An overview of the City's NPDES permit.
A discussion of operation and maintenance procedures and strategies.
Implementation priorities.
Financial considerations.
A discussion of the process for amending this Plan.
City of Brooklyn Center v
Local Water Martagement Plan
1.INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
This report provides the City of Brooklyn Center with a Local Water Management Plan (LWMP)
that serves as a guide to managing the City's surface water system, and brings the City into
compliance with Minnesota Statutes. The LWMP will guide stormwater activities in the City for
the 10 year period 2006-2016. Periodic amendment to the Plan will likely occur in the
intervening 10 years so that the Plan remains current to watershed plan amendments and
Metropolitan Council requirements.
The City of Brooklyn Center occupies approximately 8.5 square miles of land in northeastern
Hennepin County (Figure 1). Brooklyn Center is a first-ring suburb, located immediately north
and west of Minneapolis, about 6 miles from downtown.
The City of Brooklyn Center is considered fully developed. The existing City land use is one of
a well-defined commercial/industrial core surrounded by residential neighborhoods. The City is
also home to a large park and open space system. The major surface water features of Brooklyn
Center are the Mississippi River, Shingle Creek, and Twin Lakes. The topography is flat to
gently rolling with a maximum elevation differential of 60 feet. Dominant soils are coarse
textured allowing rapid percolation, but the water table is generally higher with low areas
tending to be wet.
1.2 Purpose and Scope
The Brooklyn Center LWMP will serve as a comprehensive planning document to guide the City
in conserving, protecting, and managing its surface water resources. This plan is an update to the
1996 Water Management Plan (WMP). The LWMP has been updated to meet requirements as
established in Minnesota Rules 8410. In addition, the Plan reflects the requirements of the
watersheds with jurisdiction within the City: Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed
Management Commissions (SCWM WMC).
City ofBrooklyn Center 1-1
Local Water Management Plan
�r
Anoka
oger Dayton
Coon Rapids
Champlin Blaine
�oBrooklyn Park rin Lak ark
Corcoran Maple Grove nds V ew
Fridley SY orevi
den Hi Is
Brig ton 6
N H e bp H ts
Medina
Plymouth sd le Saint A ony
Roseville
Lau e
Golden Valley F H hts
a
Minneapolis
a
int Louis Pa �k Saint Paul
Minnetonka opkin
Edina
���,��o City of Brooklyn Center N
f j��e F\TAR Surface Water Brooklyn Center
oHMMr�t�rW�wv
Management P/an 0 County Boundaries
Mi�es pROJECT LOCATION
5 0 5
Flgure 1
1:4i12W1205101\Cad1GIS�avprojects�pro�loc.apr
According to Minnesota Rules 8410, local plans must include the following:
Table of Contents
Purpose
Water Resource Related Agreements
Executive Summary
Land and Water Resource Inventory
Establishtnent of Goals and Policies
Relation of Goals and Policies to Local, Regional, State and Federal Plans, Goals and
Programs
Assessment of Problems
Corrective Actions
Financial Considerations
Implementation Priorities
Amendment Procedures
Implementation Program
Appendix
Further, the SCWM WMC Second Generation Watershed Management Plan (SGWMP) requires I
local plans to:
Describe the existing and proposed physical environment and land use.
Identify how the goals and policies, and rules and standards established in the SGWMP
will be implemented at the local level.
Describe the existing and proposed hydrology and demonstrate that stormwater storage I,
volumes and management sector peak outflow rates meet the requirements specified in the I
SGWMP.
Identify how the wetland functions and values assessments required by the SGWMP will
be undertaken.
Include a policy describing how the City intends to protect threatened and endangered
species and areas of significant natural communities identified by the DNR within its
boundaries.
Assess existing or potential water resource related problems and identify nonstructural,
programmatic, and structural solutions.
Summarize the estimated cost of implementation and analyze the City's ability to finance
the recommended actions.
Set forth an implementation program including a description of official controls,
programs, policies, and a capital improvement plan.
The City must submit the LWMP to the Metropolitan Council and the two watershed
organizations for review. These watersheds have 60 days for their review after written receipt of
the City Plan. Met Council provides comments within 45 days. The Council directs its
comments to the watershed organizations which consider these comments in formulating their
own comments.
This report addresses the City's current surface water management needs and provides a
framework for successful implementation of a comprehensive stormwater management program.
!1� City of Brooklyn Center 1 3
Local Water Management Plan
1.3 Organization
The report is organized as follows:
Section 2- Land and Water Resource Inventory, describes the physical environment
including watersheds and drainage patterns, dominant land uses, and significant water
bodies within the City.
Section 3- Goals and Policies, lists the City's goals and policies along with public agency
requirements affecting surface water management in the City.
Section 4- System Assessment, describes the existing stormwater management system in
the City and details the various assessments of problems in the existing system.
Section 5- Implementation Plan, covers regulatory responsibilities, priority
implementation items, operation and maintenance, and financing considerations. A Plan
amendment process is also identified.
Section 6- Summary and Recommendations, contains a summary of the LWMP and
makes recommendations for implementing the Plan.
I
City of Brooklyn Center 1-4
Local Water Management Plan
2. LAND AND WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY
2.1 Land Use
Figure 2 provides the 19961and use pattern for the City of Brooklyn Center. This figure comes
directly from the City's Comprehensive Plan 2020, prepared in 2000. Brooklyn Center is almost
completely urbanized, with approximately 50% of the land use comprised of single family
residential development and the remainder being mostly commercial and industrial development.
A large commercial center (Brookdale and Earle Brown Farm) occupies the northeastern portion
of the area bounded by CSAH 152 on the west, I-94 in the north and Highway 100 on the east.
A large industrial park between I-94 and 69th Avenue and between Xe�es Avenue and
Humboldt Avenue is about 80% developed with a mixture of commercial and light industrial
facilities.
The City is also defined by its green space. A broad greenway of open space begins at Palmer
Lake and follows Shingle Creek south through the City. In total the City has 23 developed
parks and a golf course, as well as considerable green space in the Twin Lakes area. Two
regional park facilities are also included within the City limits: portions of the North Mississippi
Regional Park and the North Hennepin Trail System.
Figure 3 shows the proposed 2020 land use plan. From the Comprehensive Plan, the City has
three goals for land use, redevelopment, and community image:
1. Protect and enhance the residential neighborhoods.
2. Continuously renew and make better use of land in the City Center and the Brooklyn
Boulevard Corridor.
3. Improve the appearance of the City for the sake of quality of life, properly values, and
civic pride.
The Comprehensive Plan provides a significant amount of narrative on redevelopment potential
within the City, and the reader is referred to that document for more information on land use
planning. Specific areas targeted in the Comprehensive Plan for redevelopment are the Brooklyn
Boulevard Corridor, the Gateway Area (Highway 252 at 66 Avenue), Humboldt and 69�'
Avenues, 65�' Avenue Residential Neighborhood, City Center, Northbrook Shopping Center
Area, 53` Avenue Corridor, Southwest Neighborhood, Riverfront Amenity Areas, and several
additional road corridor enhancements. The Opportunity Site, the area north of Bass Lake Road
between Highway 100 and Shingle Creek Parkway and south of I-694, is another area targeted
for redevelopment. The planned redevelopment for this area would remove some impervious
area and add a large stormwater amenity.
Ciry of Brooklyn Center 2-1
Local Water Management Plan
r
'nra xw n nm ae N
y..�
C
w+
�a �u�
S y
t
tf� i ..i 69NkeN
.r
691AWeN .l
t 1 A' i
.1
�...I'.
t
j I
���t��
469�
6 N
i I j
r
I...
;'.r l I i
E r
w9.
a f
631d Mt N
I-1 l
j
m�d `J
,�,�..i .�\�1��".
..t� l r
J
E i I 1 ,;�n�
t -1
`�A
j
r� ,.11
e.xi a�
a�
7 57d� /we N
I
d
�:J i
L _:.:c. I
f.. �.,i ::N
a
i:
p
t
I r? t
u-::
t o iaoo zaoo woo �000 s000 ka m i
�i
u� a«.. �i
i 't' 4 _n
LEGEND:
Smgle-Family Residential OffKe/Serv�ce Business
J Two �Famiy Resdert�al i� Parks and Open Space
r p [_-1 Medium-Dmsrty Residential I_I Nidushwl
M High-pensity Resldential I PuWic and SemrPublrc
i Retnil8usiness 0 Undevebp�d
Lake/Creek
O Neighborhood Boundary and Number
Figure 2
Brooklyn Center
Land Use Pattern, 1996
k
11,,
ii�
i... t� y,y Fj i
F �y,� i1 S �I I
MDR �1 I r
Q t 5�
u
`�J �'C'�R`` �IIDR S
F.
r-
i s
�_�"r .i
MbR n Space
i� Ra O` �i`
i -i 2,-� �x,.
r R �RB �p, i 1`': `DR
�/�VIDR Ly It
F, r .'R' .�.r.�rs:
Suer� �ti y y w
L«-� e �+r.�r.� �l ��1�.�Y�. r M w 1 f
zo'e yA t �1 f.�'`_'"a/` f
t"�'°'�.+_�,�� 6 y f f.T- I..
t
r
c� p E 1 f r
R�hr also to th� policln r I f 4
and plaru of 1h� Brooklyn Y►�+�.�-� r �t �'f
QoulevordSlr��haaP• I I M
Am�niri�s Sfudy(194�). l��Lt,". ER�'i,�'`� �-�M .:.lr �i.
+�T
-�3� t
E 'o��
8
t �5
R�/1Vl s��'M1X
�s�, i E'
__t c-�
Open Spate t:
4-S�_�
HbR�i ���DR
7---�� r��
1 A w� v
.�TF�
1,,,� IEGEN7: �AND USE ABBREV�ATiU�S.
�va�efw-ily Ro.ide+dNd
SF $��,�'v F�m�r�
I._-� iwo �a Rr:,.:darenl Tf i�.o Fom� y
Nfv'_m V,�2 /,tcda•o-l}!wti�JF?u�er.{�.
iDR H-,F.fi<r.r� Re,kis.�o
FWgt.[%+� �,y Rs:i<I�,rdi�. ke R.+: �I
Rx•nil &r�n+'s C) UHiccS:rvi:e Bus'ner
ONx.o/Scrviw 8�.,:;n::s I ,r•.i�:hiai
C4�d Vu�ia ond O r "^d ()p•e ��,ee+
v� �-r:.. ix r. .t-; uW
t G ','�r�arv P,�.cdoFmer� A�oa
Dwl�c urd Smn c Qa�e�:�'opm.r+ tvrn
�.:F:�.�::��, r,, �uW 4�
wH��r rP�
r__-1'�.,�ICark C7 ,_,.:IA�ca'L.rr:i:ny
g ,T p„f�;.�n_.
Figure 3
i' B okl t
com S�e a Land Use Plan
2.2 Topography and Watersheds
The Minnesota landscape is a product of the continental glaciers that produced gently rolling to
steep hills, numerous marshes and lakes, and extensive outwash plains. The City of Brooklyn
Center has a relatively flat topography resulting from outwash deposited by the Des Moines
Lobe, and specifically the Grantsburg sublobe, approximately 35,000 to 10,000 years ago by the
late Wisconsinan glaciations. As the Grantsburg sublobe retreated westward, the Mississippi
River was uncovered. Meltwater from the glacier filled the area with sand and gravel. (Soil
Survey of Hennepin County, Minnesota)
The City of Brooklyn Center is located along the Mississippi River in northeastern Hennepin
County. Most of Brooklyn Center is flat to gently rolling terrain. Fairly steep slopes occur along
the Mississippi River along the east border of the City. Elevation in the City ranges from
approximately 810 feet along the Mississippi River to approximately 870 feet along the City's
western border.
The City's hydrologic system is part of the Mississippi River watershed. The City resides within
two watershed management organizations. The eastern portion of the City along the Mississippi
River resides in the West Mississippi Watershed Management Commission. The western portion
of the City resides within the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission. Figure 4
shows jurisdictional boundaries for the two watershed organizations within the City.
2.3 Soils
The soils in Brooklyn Center were mapped in the USDA-NRCS Soil Survey of Hennepin
County, which was updated in 2004. The original soils of the Brooklyn Center area are largely
unknown because the majority of the City is covered with impervious surface or has been subject
to cut-and-fill. Onsite investigation is needed on a case-by-case basis to determine the soil type
at a specific site. Drainage characteristics of the soil types that are discernible in Brooklyn
Center, primarily in the northern part of the City, are shown in Table 2.1. Additional infortnation
about each of the soils is available from the soil survey.
I
Ciry ofBrooklyn Center 2-4
Local Water Management Plan
a
.��7 r 1
0. J \I
r_ �f i i ��i 4 i r r
i r n��i
a I L— ll i �l 1 �-���i n l/�
1� r ��I �3��T 1 �t h �i� f r
�d_ J F��:- �I ��i I IC 1
I 1 I
i� �I,rr —��,r. f��
I "�i���F'�`�
IC 1t ,L I
�;C llhry
1
��I,�tE� r�
�a G
"�i 1 y,.� GSviC�enter
ifr� r v'' Pond (6g7�
�7�t,����� West Mississippi
Watershed Management1
Shingle Creek r_ D Commission
Watershed Management
Commission
5
�-+r-,,+
639�'�' 638W ��-��i y�
j
I
,r
j I
L� 1
i
c r—=�� 1
i i=
i �\�I
UpperTwinJlake
1 1.
r {I; r'
Miarue i T�:� I�
'ltvin �,ake
Ryan,T.alce
�;y City of Brooklyn Center
Assaaates awwuai N
„�.....w,.�. Su►face Water 0 �Natershed Boundaries
0.5 0 o.s Management P/an City Boundary
M;i WATERSHED BOUNDARIES 0 Major Waterbodies
.lune 2006 Flgure 4
1:�412141205101 \Cad\GIS�avproJects�swmp.apr
Table 2.1
Soil Drainage Characteristics
Soil Series I Draina�e Characteristic Hydrolo�ic Soil Group
Anoka N Well drained B
Braham Moderately well drained B
Duelm Moderately well drained A
Elkriver Somewhat poorly drained unknown
Foldahl Moderately well drained B
Forada Poorly drained B�
Fordum Very poorly drained D
Hubbard N Excessively drained A
Isan Poorly drained
Kratka Poorly drained I B/D
Markey Very poorly drained
Seelyeville Very poorly drained A/D
Soderville Moderately well drained A
Winterf'ield Somewhat poorly drained A/D
Zimmerman Excessively drained A
The drainage nature of the soil is important for determining the surface water runoff from a given
area. If the soil is well-drained, a significant portion of the precipitation will be infiltrated into
the ground, whereas if a soil is very poorly drained, much more precipitation becomes runoff.
The hydrologic soil group (HSG) defines a soil's propensity to generate runoff for a given
rainfall event. Four HSGs are identified: A, B, C, and D. HSG A soils have the lowest potential
to generate runoff and are typically sandy or gravelly soils. HSG D soils have the highest
potential to generate runoff and typically consist of muck, peaty muck, and tight clay soils. Most
of the area of the City of Brooklyn Center where soil information is available has soil
associations of HSG A to B, indicating a low potential to generate runoff. Areas with two
hydrologic soil groups, such as A/D, indicate a drained/undrained situation. A site inspection
would be necessary to determine the exact soil group.
2.4 Key Water Resources
The City of Brooklyn Center has several water resources available for the use and enjoyment of
its residents. These major water resources tend to be State of Minnesota protected waters. Others
are streams that are important for the City's stormwater system. Key water resources and DNR
protected waters are listed in Table 2.2 and identified on Map 1 of this report. Specifics on key
water resources located within the City follow. The protected waters are labeled with their
Protected Waters Inventory (PWI) number.
Ciry of Brooklyn Center 2'6
Local Water Management Plan
1 U'�
Table 2.2
DNR Public Waters
Type Name DNR ID �'ea Maac. Mean
(acres) Depth (ft) Depth (ft)
Upper Twin Lake 27-0042-03P I 100 10
Middle Twin Lake I 27-0042-02P I 70 I 45 I 16
I Palmer Lake I 27-0059P I 30 4 2
Lakes and Ryan Lake 27-0058P I 18 I 33
Wetlands Civic Center Pond I 27-0637W I --10 I n/a I n/a I
Unnamed Wetland 27-0638W I �20 n/a n/a
Unnamed Wetland I 27-0639W I �39 I n/a I n/a
I Unnamed Wetland 27-0640W I �8 n/a n/a
I Mississippi River I I I
Rivers and Shingle Creek I I I I
Creeks Ryan Creek I
Twin Creek I I I I
�Estimated
2.4.1 Lakes and Ponds
The City of Brooklyn Center categorizes lakes and ponds into three main classification groups as
listed below. Target uses and management strategies are provided for each classification. Table
2.3 identifies the classification for each lake and pond within the City. The locations of existing
lakes and ponds are provided on Map 2 of this report.
1. Recreation Classification: Management goals consist of achieving water quality
conditions to support all recreation activities including fishing, wildlife habitat,
swimming and boating. Management of stormwater runoff from new development and
redevelopment areas is required to reduce or otherwise limit nutrients and other pollutants
from being discharged to lakes and ponds classified as recreational water bodies. The
City supports regional stormwater treatment improvements for recreational water bodies
that can be completed in conjunction with other communities and the SCWM WMC.
2. Aesthetic Classification: Management goals consist of achieving water quality conditions
to maintain existing wildlife habitat and prevent degradation of the current aesthetic and
natural values of these water bodies. Management of stormwater runoff from new
development and redevelopment areas is required to reduce or otherwise limit sediment
and nutrients from being discharged to lakes and ponds classified as aesthetic water
bodies.
City ofBrooklyn Center 2-
Local Water Management Plan
3. Runoff Management Classification: The primary function of these water bodies is to
manage and treat stormwater runoff. Runoff management ponds are intended to receive
direct runoff from urban areas and provide treatment to remove sediment and nutrients.
Table 2.3
Lake and Pond Classifications
Identification Classification Identification Classification
Name or Number Name or Number
Upper Twin Lake Recreation POND48-001 I Runoff Management
Middle Twin Lake Recreation I POND50-001 I Runoff Management I
I Ryan Lake I Recreation POND52-001 I Runoff Management
Palmer Lake Aesthetic I POND55-001 I Runoff Management
I Wetland 637W Aesthetic POND55-002 I Runoff Management
Wetland 638W Aesthetic POND55-003 I Runoff Management
Wetland 639W Aesthetic' I POND57-001 I Runoff Management
Wetland 640W Aesthetic POND57-002 I Runoff Management
I POND09-001 Runoff Management POND57-003 I Runoff Management
I POND12-001 I Runoff Management POND57-004 I Runoff Management I
I POND12-002 Runoff Management POND57-005 I Runoff Management I
POND12-003 Runoff Management I POND58-001 I Runoff Management I
POND12-004 Runoff Management POND58-002 I Runoff Management
I POND12-005 Runoff Management POND58-003 I Runoff Management
POND12-006 Runoff Management POND58-004 I Runoff Management
POND13-001 Runoff Management POND58-006 I Runoff Management
POND13-002 Runoff Management POND58-007 I Runoff Management
POND13-003 Runoff Management POND59-001 I Runoff Management
I POND17-001 Runoff Management POND59-002 I Runoff Management
POND18-001 Runoff Management I POND59-003 I Runoff Management I
POND22-001 Runoff Management POND59-004 I Runoff Management
I POND26-001 Runoff Management POND60-001 Runoff Management
POND26-002 Runoff Management I POND60-002 Runoff Manaqement
POND26-003 I Runoff Management POND60-003 I Runoff Management
POND26-004 Runoff Management POND60-004 I Runoff Management
POND26-005 I Runoff Management POND62-Q01 I Runoff Management I
POND29-001 Runoff Management POND63-001 I Runoff Management
POND29-002 Runoff Management I POND63-002 I Runoff Management
POND35-003 Runoff Management POND63-003 I Runoff Management I
POND35-004 Runoff Management POND63-004 I Runoff Management I
POND40-001 Runoff Management POND63-005 I Runoff Management I
I POND41-001 Runoff Management POND63-006 I Runoff Management
POND41-002 Runoff Management POND64-001 I Runoff Management I
POND42-001 Runoff Management POND64-002 I Runoff Management I
POND43-001 Runoff Management POND65-001 I Runoff Management
POND43-002 Runoff Management I POND66-001 I Runoff Manaqement
POND43-003 Runoff Management I POND66-002 I Runoff Manaqement I
POND43-004 Runoff Management I POND70-001 I Runoff Management
POND44-001 Runoff Management POND70-002 I Runoff Management
I POND44-002 Runoff Management POND72-001 I Runoff Management I
POND44-003 Runoff Management POND72-002 I Runoff Management
POND46-001 Runoff Management POND72-003 I Runoff Manaqement
'Modifications to Wetland 639W are identified to provide regional treatment of tributary flow entering Upper Twin
Lake.
City of Brooklyn Center 2-8
Local Water Management Plan
2.4.2 Rivers and Creeks
Shingle Creek extends through Brooklyn Center from Palmer Lake to the Centerbrook Golf
Course and serves as the primary drainage corridor for the City. Shingle Creek is designated by
the State of Minnesota as a Class 2C stream for indigenous fish and associated aquatic
communities. Shingle Creek is currently included on the State Impaired Waters List for low
dissolved oxygen, high chloride concentrations, and impaired biota. Additional information
concerning impaired waters issues is provided in Section 4 of this report. Shingle Creek through
Brooklyn Center is Hennepin County Ditch #13, and Hennepin County retains ditch authority.
The Mississippi River extends along the eastern corporate boundary of Brooklyn Center.
Approximately 37% of the City drains to the Mississippi River through larger diameter trunk
storm sewers extending under Interstate 94 and Highway 252. The section of the Mississippi
River adjacent to Brooklyn Center is included on the State Impaired Waters List for mercury and
PCBs.
Additional information regarding the condition and management strategies for Shingle Creek and
the Mississippi River is provided in Sections 3 and 4 of this report.
Two other watercourses exist within the Brooklyn Center municipal boundaries. Ryan Creek
drains Lower Twin Lake into Ryan Lake on the boundary between Brooklyn Center and
Robbinsdale. Twin Creek drains a portion of Brooklyn Park to Wetland 639W.
2.4.3 Wetlands
The National Wetland inventory was used for the 1996 WMP. No additional inventory or
assessment has been performed. Three unnamed wetlands within the City are categorized as
DNR public waters: one wetland connecting Ryan Lake to Middle Twin Lake, one at the
northern end of Upper Twin Lake, and one along Shingle Creek just south of I-94 and adjacent to
the Earle Brown Farm. The Civic Center Pond is also considered to be a wetland by the DNR
and is a public water. Additional information about these wetlands is contained in Table 2.2.
Section 5 discusses how the wetland functions and values assessments required by the SCWM
WMC Second Generation Water Management Plan will be undertaken.
2.5 Existing Flood Insurance Studies
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) updated the Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for Hennepin County in 2004. The FIRM map shows all
100-yr floodplain boundaries for the county, and includes both the floodway and flood fringe for
rivers and streams where FEMA has completed detailed engineering studies. Flood elevations
are also provided for areas where detailed studies have been completed. Within Brooklyn
Center, floodways and flood fringe areas as well as flood elevations are provided for both
Shingle Creek and the Mississippi River. 100-yr floodplain boundaries also exist around lakes
and wetlands throughout the City.
City of Brooklyn Center 2-9
y Local Water Management Plan
3. GOALS AND POLICIES
3.1 Purpose
The primary goal of Brooklyn Center's LWMP is to bring the City into statutory compliance and
provide the City a framework for effective stormwater management primarily to guide
redevelopment activities but also as a guide for identifying and implementing retrofits to the
existing system. These retrofits consist of both projects and programs. Additionally, the plan
provides clear guidance on how Brooklyn Center intends to manage surface water in terms of
both quantity and quality.
This plan is an update to the 1996 Water Management Plan (WMP) for the purposes of providing
the City with a plan that meets the requirements of Minnesota Statute 103B and Rules 8410, and
the SCWM WMC requirements outlined in their Second Generation Watershed Management
Plan.
3.2 Background
The City completed its first comprehensive plan in 1979 and amended the plan in 2000 in a
document titled Comprehensive Plan 2020. The 2000 Comprehensive Plan reiterated the goals
of the previous plan, while also responding to emerging issues and changing conditions of the
1990s.
Specific to the goals and policies of this Local Water Management Plan is the following
statement from the 2000 Comprehensive Plan under the Water Resources Management
subsection:
"Future improvement to the system will consist of continued maintenance through
regular and routine projects to repair or reconstruct storm sewer and detention ponds;
implementation of a regular program to inspect private storm drainage systems;
construction of regional treatment facilities; and continued study of the qualiry of surface
waters, in conjunction with the trvo watershed organizations.
The 2006 Brooklyn Center LWNIP expands upon the goals and objectives provided in the 2000
Comprehensive Plan and the 1996 Water Management Plan.
3.3 City of Brooklyn Center LWMP Goals and Policies
This section of the LWIVIP outlines goals and policies specific to surface water management in
Brooklyn Center and its environs. The goals identified below are broad statements regarding the
motivation and intent of the LWMP. The policies that follow individual goals are specific
requirements that promote attainment of the goal.
Ciiy ofBrooklyn Center 3-1
Local Water Management Plan
Goall
To minimize public capital and maintenance expenditures necessary to control excessive
volumes and rates for stormwater runoff.
Policy 11
Preserve existing storage capacities of protected waters, wetlands and natural water
courses.
Policy 1.2
Perform hydrologic and hydraulic modeling on a case-by-case basis to analyze runoff
characteristics for development and redevelopment projects.
Policy 1.3
Limit stormwater runoff rates from development and redevelopment sites based on the
design standards provided in Appendix A.
Policy 1.4
Provide additional storage either onsite or within the subwatershed where necessary to
comply with the standards provided in Appendix A.
Policy 1.5
Implement cost effective and efficient methods of stormwater management to limit public
expenditures.
Policy 1.6
Coordinate the preservation and enhancement of storage areas where appropriate with
state, county and neighboring municipal agencies.
Goa12
To provide a reasonable level of stormwater flood protection within the City of Brooklyn Center
to limit potential flood damage.
Policy 2.1
Prohibit encroachment that will reduce the storage capacity of floodplains, unless
mitigating action is undertaken.
Policy 2.2
Allow only structures that have been flood-proofed or will not be subject to excessive
damage in the floodway fringe.
Policy 2.3
Establish a 5-year rainfall event as the minimum criteria for new stormwater conveyance
facility designs.
Ciry ofBrooklyn Center 3-2
Local Water Management Plan
Policy 2.4
Require new habitable structures to be protected from flooding during the 100-year
rainfall event.
Goa13
To maintain or improve both surface water and groundwater quality.
Policy 3.1
Promote the implementation of water quality best management practices for treatment
and/or control of stormwater runoff in accordance with the requirements as outlined in
Appendix A.
Policy 3.2
Preserve and protect wetlands which provide natural treatment for runoff where
necessary to comply with the LWMP.
Policy 3.3
Support water quality monitoring efforts being undertaken by the SCWM WMC.
Policy 3.4
Protect groundwater recharge areas from potential sources of contamination in
accordance with the City's Wellhead Protection Plan.
Goa14
To protect and enhance fish and water related wildlife habitats.
Policy 4.1
Promote those aspects of local shoreland regulations that enhance fish and wildlife
habitat to the extent feasible.
Policy 4.2
Preserve protected waters and wetlands that provide habitat for game fish spawning and
wildlife to the extent feasible.
Policy 4.3
Coordinate efforts to protect areas of significant natural communities with the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources.
Policy 4.4
Coordinate efforts to protect rare and endangered species with the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources.
Goa15
To protect and enhance opportunities for water recreation.
City of Brooklyn Center 3-3
Local Water Management Plan
Policy 5.1
Coordinate efforts with state, county and neighboring municipalities to enhance water-
based recreation to the extent practical.
Goa16
To coordinate stormwater management efforts with the SCWM WMC, adjacent communities
and citizens within Brooklyn Center
Policy 6.1
Work with adjacent municipalities and the SCWM WMC in planning and implementing
mutually beneficial regional type stormwater management improvements.
Policy 6.2
Promote implementation of water quality improvements involving wetland 639W and
Twin Lakes as described in the Twin Lakes Management Plan.
These goals and policies are intended to incorporate the spirit of several regional, state and
federally mandated programs. They are not meant to replace or alter these programs, rules and
regulations, but to serve as an enhancement and provide some general policy guidelines. The
goals address the management strategies of both watershed management commissions, West
Mississippi and Shingle Creek, and are consistent with the objectives set forth in the State
Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and the Federal Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP).
3.4 Shingle Creel� and West Mississippi Watershed Management
Commissions Second Generation Watershed Management Plan Goals and
Policies
This section addresses how the goals, policies, and strategies in this Plan address the goals and
policies outlined in the SCWM WMC Second Generation Watershed Management Plan Section
6 Management Framework.
Management Area: Water Quantity
SCWM WMC Goal 1 and Policies 1.1— 1.3 are supported by Goal 1 and Policies 1.1-1.4
and 1.6 of this Plan.
SCWM WMC Policy 1.4 is addressed by City Ordinance 15-106. The ordinance states
that a storm water easement or drainage right of way will be provided for drainage where a
subdivision is traversed by a water course, drainage way, channel or stream. Utility
easements will be provided where necessary.
SCWM WMC Policy 1.5 is supported by Policies 3.3 and 6.1 of this Plan.
SCWM WMC Policy 1.6 is addressed in the City Ordinance in Chapter 35 Zoning and
in Policy 2.4 of this Plan.
City of Brooklyn Center 3-4
Local Water Management Plan
Mana ement Area: Water uali
g Q t3'
SCWM WMC Goa12 and Policies 2.1— 2.8 are supported by Goa13 and Policies 3.1 3.4
and Goa16 and Policies 6.1 and 6.2 of this Plan.
Management Area: Recreation, Fish, and Wildlife
SCWM WMC Goa13 and Policies 3.1 3.4 are supported by Goa14 and Policies 4.1 4.4
and Goal 5 and Policy 5.1 of this Plan. Palmer Lake Basin is a DNR Regionally
Significant Ecological Area, and the Mississippi River and the Shingle Creek Corridor
from Palmer Lake to the Mississippi River are Metro Priority Wildlife Corridors.
Management Area: Public Participation, Information and Education
SCWM WMC Goa14 and Policies 4.1 4.6 are supported by Goal 6 and Policies 6.1 of
this Plan.
Management Area: Ditches
SCWM WMC Goal 5 is supported by Goa16 and Policy 6.1 of this Plan.
Management Area: Groundwater
SCWM WMC Goal 6 and Policy 6.1 are supported by Goa13 and Policy 3.4 of this Plan.
SCWM WMC Policy 6.2 is supported by Goa16 and Policy 6.1 of this Plan.
Management Area: Wetlands
SCWM WMC Goa17 is supported by Goa13 and Policies 3.1 and 3.2 of this Plan.
SCWM WMC Policies 7.1 7.3 are supported by Goa16 and Policies 6.1 and 6.2 of this
Plan, and by completion of the functions and values assessment which is addressed in
Section 5: Implementation Plan.
Management Area: Erosion/Sedimentation
SCWM WMC Goal 8 and Policies 8.1 and 8.4 are supported by the permit for land
disturbing activities and requirement of an erosion and sediment control plan presented in
City Ordinance Section 35-235. The ordinance states that no construction, reconstruction,
development, redevelopment, grading, excavation, or other activity shall occur without
first securing a permit from the City if such activity causes a land disturbance of one acre
or more of land or a land disturbance of less than one acre if it is a part of a common plan
of development of one acre or more. The applicant must submit an erosion and sediment
City of Brooklyn Center 3-S
Local Water Management Plan
control plan with the application. The plan shall be consistent with the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency's Best Management Practices Handbook.
SCWM WMC Policy 8.3 is supported by Goal 6 and Policy 6.1 of this Plan.
3.5 County, State and Federal Agency Jurisdiction
This section of the LWMP presents a synopsis of the current agency jurisdictions within
Brooklyn Center. The City is committed to the preservation and enhancement of its wetlands
and water resources through full compliance with local, state, and federal wetland regulations.
3.5.1 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
At the state level, Types 3, 4, and 5 wetlands are protected by statute. These are areas typically
recognized as wetlands and are generally characterized by open water and emergent vegetation
throughout most of the year. The state has jurisdiction over only those wetlands appearing on
the state's inventory of protected waters. Further, wetlands in the inventory were generally those
in excess of 10 acres in rural areas or in excess of 2.5 acres in municipalities and incorporated
areas.
If an area meets the jurisdictional criteria but is not on the state's inventory, it is not regulated by
the DNR. If it does not meet the sta.tutory criteria but is listed on the inventory, it still is subject
to DNR regulation. There is no mechanism presently for adding wetlands to or deleting wetlands
from the inventory. The inventory was begun in the late 1970s and all state inventories were
completed during the early 1980s.
The DNR rules specify that permits may not be issued for any project except those that provide
for public health, safety, and welfare. Any private development projects are effectively excluded
from permit consideration by this requirement.
The eastern portions of the City abutting the Mississippi River are located in the Mississippi
River Critical Area Corridor. According to the DNR:
The purposes of designating the Mississippi River as a state critical area include the
following:
a. protecting and preserving a unique and valuable state and regional resource for the
benefit of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens for the state, region, and
nation;
b. preventing and mitigating irreversible damage to this resource;
c. preserving and enhancing its natural, aesthetic, cultural, and historical value for
public use;
d. protecting and preserving the river as an essential element in the national, state, and
regional transportation, sewer and water, and recreational systems; and protecting and
preserving the biological and ecological functions of the corridor.
The DNR has three primary roles for the Mississippi River Critical Area Program. The DNR
has undertaken the mandate of reviewing existing ordinances that affect lands within the
Ciry ofBrooklyn Center 3-6
Local Water Management Plan
Mississippi River Critical Area Corridor for their compliance with state critical area
standards and guidelines. Technical assistance for ordinance development will be provided to
local communities to ensure adoption and approval of a compliant state critical area
ordinance or any ordinance amendments. DNR will also provide individualized technical
assistance for amending existing ordinances or developing proposed ordinances that will be
consistent with the voluntary MNRRA Comprehensive Management Plan (CMP) policies. In
addition, adoption or amendment of plans and ordinances affecting lands within the
Mississippi River Critical Area Corridor and relating to Executive Order 79-19 purposes and
standards are effective only after approval by the DNR. The DNR reviews the plans and
ordinances to ensure their consistency with the provisions of Executive Order 79-19,
following an evaluation by the Metropolitan Council.
In communities where critical area plans and ordinances have become effective, the local
governmental unit also must notify the DNR area hydrologist at least 30 days before action is
taken for all development applications or variances requiring a public hearing or
discretionary action.
In communities where plans and regulations have not been adopted or approved, the DNR is
also to be notified about additional types of projects listed in the Interim Regulations. DNR
will review and comment on the project's compliance with critical area and state
requirements and MNRRA policies, as well as provide technical assistance as requested.
Notice of the final action is to be sent to the DNR.
The other powers and duties of this Minnesota state agency and its commissioner are wide-
ranging. As they affect surface water management within the City they include:
Regulation of all public waters inventory waterbodies within the City to the extent of
their ordinary high water level.
Regulation of certified floodplains around rivers, creeks, lakes and wetlands.
Management of the Flood Hazard Mitigation program.
Shoreland Management.
3.5.2 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (LTSACE)
Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, including subsequent modifications, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
regulate the placement of fill into all wetlands of the U.S. In 1993, there was a modification of
the definition of "discharge of dredged material" to include incidental discharges associated with
excavation. This modification of the "discharge of dredged material" definition meant that any
4 ermittin
excavation done within a wetland required the applicant to go through Section 40 p g
procedures. In 1998, however, this decision was modified so that excavation in wetlands is now
regulated by the USACE only when it is associated with a fill action.
Ciry ofBrooklyn Center 3-
Local Water Management Plan
3.5.3 Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR)
The local and regional wetland rules are governed by the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA).
The WCA, passed in 1991, extends protection to all wetlands unless they fall under one of the
exemptions of the WCA. The WCA follows a"no net loss" policy. The wetlands covered under
the WCA must not be drained or filled, wholly or partially, unless replaced by restoring or
creating wetland of at least equal public value under an approved replacement plan.
Replacement ratio is typically 2:1 (2 acres created for every 1 acre filled) for wetland impacts.
A designated Local Government Unit (LGi� is responsible for making exemption and no-loss
determinations and approving replacement plans. Currently, Shingle Creek and West
Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions act as the LGU for WCA within the City.
The powers and duties of this Minnesota state agency also include:
Coordination of water and soil resources planning among counties, watersheds, and local
units of government.
Facilitation of communication among state agencies in cooperation with the
Environmental Quality Board.
Approval of watershed management �ilans.
3.5.4 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) implements provisions of Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act with guidance from the EPA through a permitting process. The Section 404
permit also requires a Section 441 water quality certification before it is valid. The EPA has
given Section 401 certification authority to the MPCA.
The powers and duties of this Minnesota state agency and its commissioner include:
Fulfilling mandates from the EPA, particularly in regard to the Clean Water Act.
Administration of Brooklyn Center's NPDES Phase II MS4 permit.
Administration of the NPDES construction site permit program.
Administration of the NPDES industrial site discharge permit program.
Development of total maximum daily loads (T1VIDLs) for waterbodies and watercourses in
Minnesota (often in conjunction with other agencies or joint powers organizations such as
watersheds).
3.5.5 Environmental Protection Agency
As it relates to surface water management within Brooklyn Center, this agency is charged with
interpreting and applying aspects of the Clean Water Act. This has led to the City's need for its
NPDES MS4 Permit. Total maximum daily load limits, a new initiative mandated by the EPA,
also stem from the EPA's role as steward of the Clean Water Act.
City of Brooklyn Center 3-8
Local Water Management Plan
3.5.6 Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions
The powers and duties of these Minnesota statutory authorities include:
Approval authority over local water management plans.
Ability to develop rules regarding management of the surface water system.
Ability to determine a budget and raise revenue for the purpose of covering administrative
and capital improvement costs.
Regulation of land use and development when one or more of the following apply:
o The City does not have an approved local plan in place.
o The City is in violation of their approved local plan.
o The City authorizes the watershed toward such regulation.
Wetland Conservation Act administration when designated as the LGU for a City.
Other powers and duties as given in statute and joint powers agreements.
3.5.7 State and Federal Jurisdictional Boundaries for Public Wetlands and Waters
Wetlands are delineated in accordance with the Federal Manual for ldentifying and Delineating
Jurisdictional Wetlands (1987). Wetlands must have a predominance of hydric soils. Hydric
soils, by definition, are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency
and duration sufficient to support, under normal circumstances, a prevalence of hydrophytic
(water tolerant) vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. The USACE
and the BWSR regulate wetlands as defined by a jurisdictional delineation.
For wetlands that fall under the DNR jurisdiction, the Ordinary High Water Level (OHV�
determines the boundary of DNR jurisdiction. The OHW is established by the DNR. A
summary of agency jurisdiction is presented in Figures 5 and 6.
3.5.8 Hennepin County
Hennepin County sits on the Technical Evaluation Panel for administration of the Wetland
Conservation Act. The county also has jurisdiction over the North Mississippi Regional Park
and has partnered with the City on maintenance and reconstruction efforts of the portion of the
North Hennepin Trail System that traverses the City. Hennepin County has ditch authority over
County Ditch #13, which includes all of Shingle Creek in Brooklyn Center.
3.5.9 Metropolitan Council
Metropolitan Council, through Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, serves as a review
agency for Local Water Management Plans. They also review and approve municipal
comprehensive plans and have a prominent role in the Mississippi River Critical Area Corridor
as described on the DNR website:
City of Brooklyn Center 3-9
Local Water Management Plan
i
MINNESOTA STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTION OVER "WATERS"
i
i i i
I CORPS/MPCA C RPS/MPCA
SEC. 404/401 SEC��. 404f401 CORPS/MPCA
I CWA I DNR ICWA I I SEC. 4/401 I
LGU/ I I I
LGU/BWSR IBWSR—I I LGU BWSR— WCA I
�I wCA I W� I I I
I 1 I NON—WETLAND I
I I I I I I NON—WETLAND
I PUBLIC WATERS WATER BASIN I I I I
I I WATERS OF THE U.S. (WETLANDS) I I I WATERS OF THE U.S. I
I I I I I (WErv+NDS)
JURISDICTIONAL JURISDICTIONAL JURISDICTIONAL JURISDICTIONAL
WEfLAND WEfLAND WEfLAND WEfLAND
DELINEATION DEUNEATION DEUNEATION DEUNEATION
OHWL NON—DNR PROTECTED WATERBODY
BASED ON ELEVATION
EfERMINED BY DNR)
DNR PROTECTED WATERBODY �W
CWA CLEAN WATER ACT
WCA MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT
�.5. oF ���N�. AG E N CY
THE CORPS HAS JURISDICTION ON
WERMIDS THAT ARE PART oF, Ort CORPS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
CONNECTED eY TRIBUTARY, TO A BWSR MINNESOTA BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES
WA ONR MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
LGU LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNIT
MPCA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
PUBLIC WATERS: WATER BASIN Bonestroo
Rosene
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FIGURE 5 Anderlik 8
Associates
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
I:\412\41205101\Cad\Dwg\�gure5.dwg June 2006
MINNESOTA STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTION OVER "WATERS"
I EPA CORPS CWA, SECTION 404 i I
CORPS RHA, SECTION 10 I I
i I
FLOODPLAW I I
I
I MPCA CWA, SECTION 401 I I
I
Mn pNR ��i
I_ LGU/BWSR— _I I I
WCA
I
I
I
WATERS OF I I I�
NON I THE U.S. WATERS OF THE U.S.
WETLANOS i (yy�qNDS) I pUBLIC WATERS I I
I WATER COURSE I I
CWA CLEAN WATER ACT I I
RHA RNERS AND HARBORS ACT OF 1899 FEDERAL FEDERAL DNR
WCA MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1991 �H�y OHW OHWL
AGENCY DNR
OHWL
EPA U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY THIS UNE COULD CHANGE ELEVATION
CORPS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AT ANY GIVEN X—SECTION. CONSEQUENTLY
BWSR MINNESOTA BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES THE JURISDICTION CHANGES
MnDNR MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
LGU LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNIT
MPCA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
PUBLIC WATERS: WATER COURSE eonestroo
Rosene
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FIGURE 6 ��derlik
Associates
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
I:\412\41205101 \Cad\Dwg�Figure6.dwg June 2006
The Metropolitan Council reviews existing plans that affect lands within the Mississippi
River Critical Area Corridor. Technical assistance is provided to assist communities in
amending or adopting plans to become consistent with Executive Order 79-19 standards
and guidelines and any voluntary MNRRA CMP policies. The council reviews all critical
area plans and ordinances and makes an evaluation to DNR prior to the approval
decision. In addition, the council administers the pass-through funds from the National
Park Service to provide financial assistance to communities wishing to revise their plans
and ordinances. The council is also involved with oversight of the Metropolitan Land
Planning Act.
3.6 Water Resource Management-related Agreements
The City of Brooklyn Center is party to two separate joint powers agreements related to surface
water management:
1. With the cities of Brooklyn Park, Crystal, Maple Grove, Minneapolis, New Hope,
Osseo, Plymouth, and Robbinsdale establishing the Shingle Creek Watershed
Management Commission.
2. With the cities of Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Maple Grove, and Osseo establishing
the West Mississippi Watershed Management Commission.
The City also has an agreement with both the Shingle Creek Watershed Management
Commission and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commission establishing the
watersheds as the Local Government Unit for administering WCA within the City.
3.7 Impacts of the Brooklyn Center LWMP on Other Units of Government
Upon approval of this LWiVIP by the two watersheds with jurisdiction over the City, it is the
City's intent to maintain its current permitting powers through its Permit for Land Disturbing
Activities. Currently, the Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management
Commissions do not issue permits, so no impact to these organizations would occur. The
watersheds would continue in their role as project review agencies.
3.8 Watershed Rules and Standards that Affect the City of Brooklyn Center
The City of Brooklyn Center engineering standards, presented in Appendix A, are a close
reflection of the rules and standards of the SCWM WMC, only presented through the municipal
filter. The left column in Table 3.1 is a summary of the SCWM WMC rules and standards, while
the right column describes the applicable City controls as described in the LWMP or contained
within the City's Code of Ordinances. The standards presented in Appendix A are the minimum
standards for stormwater conveyance and management within the City of Brooklyn Center and
are required to be met for all new development and redevelopment.
City ofBrooklyn Center 3-12
Local Water Management Plan
Table 3.1
Summary of Design Standards and Criteria for Shingle Creek/West Mississippi
Watershed Management Commission and the City of Brooklyn Center
SCWM WMC Standard Brooklyn Center Local Control
A Stormwater Management Plan consistent with all City Ordinance Section 35-235: All activities requiring a permit for land
Project Reviews applicable management rules and standards must be disturbing activities from the City shall conform to all requirements of
Required reviewed and approved by the commission prior to federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations.
commencement of land disturbing activities.
Peak runoff rates may not exceed existing rates for the Standard 2B: Runoff rates for proposed development and redevelopment
2-year, 10-year, and 100-year critical storm event; or sites shall not exceed existing runoff rates for the 2-year, 10-year and 100-
Rate Control the capacity of downstream conveyance facilities; or year critical storm frequency event or rates noted in the approved local
contribute to flooding. water management plan. Runoff rates may be restricted to less than the
e�usting rates when necessary for the public health and general welfare of I
the watershed or where restricted downstream capacity exists. I
One-half inch of impervious surface runoff must be Standard 2J: Infiltration best management practices shall be
infiltrated within 72 hours. incorporated into the drainage design for development and redevelopment
project areas. Infiltration practices shall provide for the infiltration of
one-half inch of runoff from impervious surfaces and must be capable of
infiltrating said volume within 72 hours. Examples of acceptable
infiltration practices include infiltration trenches, rainwater gardens, and
infiltration basins. Infiltration shall not be provided for runoff from
fueling and vehicle maintenance areas or for runoff from industrial,
commercial and institutional parking lots. Infiltration practices shall not
Infiltration be installed in areas with less than 3 feet separation from the bottom of
the infiltration system to the elevation of seasonal high groundwater; in
areas with less than 5 feet separation distance from the bottom of the
infiltration system to the elevation of seasonal high groundwater for
locations receiving runoff from public and private roadways; areas within
400 feet of a community water well or within 100 feet of a private well;
and in areas located within the Drinking Water Supply Management Area
of the City of Brooklyn Center or any other communiTy's Drinking Water
Supply Management Area that extends into the corporate boundary of the
City of Brooklyn Center.
City ofBrooklyn Center 3-13
Local Water Management Plan
Erosion and Erosion control plan using Best Management City Ordinance Section 35-235: The applicant shall submit an erosion
Sediment Practices (BMPs) is Required. and sediment control plan that shall be consistent with the Minnesota
Control Pollution Control Agency's Best Management Practices Handbook.
Compensating storage is required to mitigate Standard SA: Existing water storage capacity should be preserved below
floodplain fill. the 100-year critical flood elevation on all public waters within designated
Floodplain floodplain areas.
Alteration Standard 5B: Development within the floodplain should be minimized
that will unduly restrict flood flows or aggravate known high water
problems.
Standard SC: Compensatory storage will be required for floodplain fill.
Permanent sedimentation and water qualiTy ponds Standard 3B: Water quality treatment ponds (wet ponds) shall be
consistent with NLJRP and BMPs are required, designed in accordance with National Urban Runoff Program (NURP)
providing a permanent wet pool with dead storage of standards and other specific standards as established by the City of
at least the runoff from a 2.5 inch event and an outlet Brooklyn Center.
Water Quality skimmer controlling floatables and oils. Standard 3C: Water quality treatment ponds shall have an elongated
shape (preferably a 3:1 length to width ratio) and be sized with a
permanent wet pool volume equal to the runoff from a 2.5-inch storm
event generated from the tributary drainage area (when practical as 'I
determined by the City of Brooklyn Center).
Vegetated buffer strips of a minimum 20 foot, average Standard 4B: A vegetated buffer strip with a minimum buffer width of
Buffer Strips 30 foot width are required adjacent to wetlands and 20-feet and an average width of 30-feet measured from the ordinary high
watercourses. water level of the watercourse or wetland is required adjacent to wetlands,
lakes and natural water course.
Wetlands may not be drained, filled, excavated, or Standard 4A: Wetlands may not be drained, filled, or excavated without
Wetland otherwise altered without an approved wetland prior approval from the Shingle Creek or West Mississippi Watershed
replacement plan from the local government unit Management Commission in accordance with the Wetland Conservation
(LGin with jurisdiction Act.
City of Brooklyn Center 3-14
Locad Water Management Plan
4. SYSTEM ASSESSMENT
4.1 General
This section of the Brooklyn Center Local Water Management Plan serves two functions. The
system description portion describes the City's surface water management system. This system
is shown on Map 1. The map indicates the major drainage divides, storage areas, conveyance
(including pipe and channels), wetlands and lakes in the City.
The assessment portion catalogues the various assessments of problems that have been
performed in the past. The intent is to identify the source of problems and specific actions the
City proposes to take to address these problems either independently or in collaboration with
some other organization most commonly one of the watersheds.
4.2 System Description
This subsection describes the surface water management system for the City of Brooklyn Center.
Approximately one-third of the City is located in the West Mississippi Watershed, and the
remaining two-thirds of the City are located in the Shingle Creek Watershed. In the 1996 WMP,
the City was divided into 13 stormwater districts based on topographic information and data
from the existing stormwater system. These districts have been maintained in this report, with
minor changes in boundaries to reflect updated stormwater system information. The district
names have also been maintained for continuity.
The SCWM WMC Second Generation Plan identified certain volume and peak outflow rate
goals which are also addressed.
4.2.1 West Mississippi Watershed
Within Brooklyn Center, the West Mississippi watershed extends from just east of Shingle Creek
to the Mississippi River. The area is fully developed and is serviced by City storm sewer pipes.
There are four drainage districts within the West Mississippi Watershed: LWM1, LWM2,
LWM3, and LWM4. All four districts discharge directly to the Mississippi River. A portion of
district LSCS in the Shingle Creek Watershed between Highway 100 and Shingle Creek Parkway
is also served by storm sewer that discharges to the Mississippi River. During large storms this
area follows natural drainage patterns and overflows to Shingle Creek.
There are no r i n r h d ortion of the
e o al stormwater stora e areas in the West Mississi i Wate s e
g g PP P
City.
4.2.2 Shin le Creek Water h
g
s ed
The remainder of the City of Brooklyn Center is contained in the Shingle Creek Watershed. The
watershed extends from the western border of the City to Shingle Creek, and includes the
subwatersheds of Palmer Lake and Twin Lakes.
I
City ofBrooklyn Center 4-1
Local Water Management Plan
Within the Shingle Creek Watershed, the drainage districts discharge as follows:
MSC1, in the north portion of Brooklyn Center discharges overland and via storm sewer
into Palmer Lake.
MSC2, in the northwestern portion of the City, discharges through storm sewer north to
the Brooklyn Park system.
MSC3, in the northwest portion of the City, discharges to the Island Ponds area and from
there through a creek system into Shingle Creek.
LSC3, in the very southern part of the City, discharges under the Soo Line and into Ryan
Lake in Robbinsdale.
LSC4 and LSCS in the middle of the City discharge directly into Shingle Creek via storm
sewer and overland flow. As discussed in the West Mississippi section above, portions of
LSCS are serviced by storm sewer which discharges to the Mississippi River, but any
overland flow discharges into Shingle Creek.
TL1, TL4, and T'LS drain directly into the Twin Lakes. TL1 discharges into Middle Twin
Lake in the City of Crystal while TL4 and TLS discharge into Upper Twin Lake. The
districts have a minimal amount of storm sewer. In all areas, the majority of runoff occurs
overland in the streets. Upper Twin Lake discharges via channel into Middle Twin Lake
and out of the City.
Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission identifies the critical stormwater storage
areas in Brooklyn Center to be Upper Twin Lake, Middle Twin Lake, CR 10 (DNR PW 639V�,
Brookdale culvert (DNR PW 638V�, Regional pond (I-694 at Brooklyn Boulevard), and Palmer
Lake. Of these waterbodies, all but the regional pond are DNR public waters and are protected
by the state. The regional pond is protected from encroachment within a City easement.
Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission also has set a limit on the discharge rate for
Shingle Creek at the City's downstream limits. The maximum discharge for Shingle Creek
exiting Brooklyn Center is 790 cfs. Based on the Watershed's HydroCAD model from August
2002, which reflected current land usage, the existing peak flow rate was 634 cfs. Because
Brooklyn Center is a fully developed city, changes to the peak flow rate from within Brooklyn
Center are and will continue to be negligible. A large portion of the Shingle Creek Watershed
from Brooklyn Park drains into Palmer Lake and then into Brooklyn Center. However, even if
the peak discharge from Brooklyn Park rises to its limit of 1515 cfs, the peak flow rate at
Brooklyn Center's downstream border will not be noticeably affected because of sufficient outlet
control at Palmer Lake and the Brookdale Culvert. The City will review future large-scale
redevelopment projects to determine the extent of potential impacts to the current total discharge
limitation at the City limits.
City ofBrooklyn Center 4-2
Local Water Management Plan
4.3 System Assessment
4.3.1 City Assessments
Two City assessments are available. The City assessed the entire stormwater system in its 1996
Water Management Plan. A water quality assessment of Twin Lakes was also completed in
2003 with the Twin Lakes Manage�nent Plan.
4.3.1.1 1996 WMP
The 1996 WMP was very detailed in its analysis of problem areas associated with water quality
and quantity problems. That report analyzes each drainage district separately, identifying
flooding and quality issues on a local level. The reader is referred to that report for an in-depth
analysis of stormwater management issues. What follows below is a summary of the major
issues discussed by that report, updated for current conditions. Global issues are major inter-
community, inter-watershed, or inter-district issues requiring the cooperation of one or more
outside parties (watershed, adjacent community, agency) for resolution. Local issues are
stormwater management issues that can be resolved by the City of Brooklyn Center.
GlobalIssues
o Palmer Lake has the highest concentration of TP in the watershed at 15 mg/L.
o Upper and Middle Twin Lakes have high nutrient loadings. They are managed as
recreational waterbodies.
o The City has completed several retrofit projects to add regional stormwater
treatment facilities over the past five to six years.
LocalIssues
o Some areas in the Ciry are not served by storm sewer pipes, resulting in long
distances of street flows and flow in poorly defined or non-existent gutters and
across streets. This contributes to erosion and the degradation of pavement edges
and granular subgrade.
o Redevelopment sites are evaluated individually, which promotes on-site detention
and somewhat less effective water quality facilities than would be produced if
regional ponding was promoted.
4.3.1.2 Twin Lakes Management Plan
The Twin Lakes Management Plan was commissioned by the City of Brooklyn Center in 2003 to
address the importance of Twin Lakes as an outstanding water resource for the area and concerns
about the threat to swimmability, fishability, aesthetics, diversity of plants and wildlife, and
shoreline environment due to poor water quality. The management plan was funded by
Brooklyn Center to promote regional water quality improvement and provide planning guidance
to the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission.
A summary assessment of Twin Lakes follows. Only Middle and Upper Twin Lakes have
surface area in Brooklyn Center.
City ofBrooklyn Center 4-3
Local Water Management Plan
"Water quality in Upper and Lower Twin Lakes is considered poor (hypereutrophic; Carlson's
Trophic Status (TSI) of 75 and 71 respectively) with frequent algal blooms while Middle Twin
Lake has more moderately degraded water quality (eutrophic; TSI of 65) but still has nuisance
algal blooms. A TSI value less than 57 is generally regarded as suitable water quality for
swimming. Upper and Lower Twin Lakes do not currently support recreational activities while
Middle Twin Lake partially supports recreational activities (based on MPCA guidelines). All
three basins are on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's list of impaired waters (303(d) list)
for nutrients and fish consumption advisories (mercury and PCB)." (Twin Lakes Management
Plan)
The major conclusions from the diagnostic study for the report are shown below.
Upper Twin Lake
Internal phosphorus load represents 15 of the total load
Watersheds 1 and 3 represent the largest external loads. Much of the watershed load is a
direct result of loading from DNR wetland 639W (42% of total load).
Middle Twin Lake
The largest load to Middle Twin Lake is from Upper Twin Lake representing
approximately 58% of the phosphorus load to Middle Twin Lake.
Middle Twin Lake had a high sedimentation rate calibration suggesting that the wetland
area between the lakes may be a phosphorus sink.
4.3.2 Watershed Assessments
The Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Second
Generation Water Management Plan gives a thorough analysis of water resources problems in
their watersheds, both general and specific to Cities and smaller subwatersheds. What follows is
a general summary of assessments detailed in that report along with any problems that pertain
directly to Brooklyn Center.
4.3.2.1 Water Quantity
General Summary
•"Much of the Shingle Creek and West Mississippi watershed is fully developed, and the
balance of the area is currently being developed. Land use best management practices
have been implemented to control stormwater runoff. There is limited data on flow
measurements, but the data available does not indicate an increase in flows in Shingle
Creek. Member cities have not observed appreciable changes in localized flooding or
bank full conditions." (SCWM WMC 2004)
Specific Brooklyn Center Issues
•"Flooding of recreational facilities (ballfields, trails) in the floodplain adjacent to Shingle
Creek and Palmer Lake more often than is acceptable. Projects to reduce or eliminate
localized trail flooding in the Palmer Lake area have been completed, while the city
City of Brooklyn Center 4-4
Local Water Management Plan
continues to investigate ways to reduce or eliminate flooding at several locations along the
Shingle Creek trail." (SCWM WMC 2004)
4.3.2.2 Water Quality
General Summary
•"In general, water quality in Shingle Creek is typical of that in urban watersheds in the
Twin Cities metro area as well as the United States. There are concerns related to
phosphorus loading to water bodies in the watershed as well as the Mississippi River.
Additionally, significant improvements are needed for habitat benefits including structural
changes to the stream channel itsel£" (SCWM WMC 2004)
Specific Brooklyn Center Issues
Impaired waters (see Clean Water Act Assessments below)
Lake water quality
o Key indicators and attributes of the lakes in the watersheds were reported. Palmer
Lake was not included in this assessment, so the only lakes in Brooklyn Center
that were assessed were Middle Twin Lake and Upper Twin Lake. The lake
attributes are shown in the Table 4.1, along with the "inter-quartile range" (25 to
75�' percentile) for reference lakes in the region. Reference lakes are lakes within
the ecoregion that are considered both representative of the ecoregion and
minimally impacted by development.
The Trophic State Indices (TSI) are an indication of "trophic" or nourishment
status. Lakes range from oligotrophic, which have very few nutrients and hence
little aquatic life, to hypereutrophic, which have too many nutrients that often
result in algal growth. The TSI is calculated based on phosphorus concentration,
Chlorophyll-a concentration, and Secchi depth.
Because of their high TSI, Upper Twin Lake was categorized as not supportive of
recreation, and Middle Twin Lake was categorized as only partially supportive of
recreation.
Table 41
Lake Water Quality Attributes
Lake Total Chlorophyll-a Total Kjeldahl Secchi Disk Trophic State
Phosphorus (µg/L) Nitrogen Transparency Indices
(u�/I (u,�/L,) (meters)
Middle Twin 60 28 1.3 1.7 65-Eutrophic
Upper Twin 137 56 1.7 I 0.48 75-Hypereutrophic
inter-quartile range 23-50 5-22 0.6-1.2 1.5-3.2 60 (50`" percentile)
Stream Water Quality
o Two sampling locations on Shingle Creek monitor total phosphorus, dissolved
phosphorus, total suspended solids, volatile suspended solids, Nitrate+Nitrite, and
City of Brooklyn Center 4-S
Local Water Management Plan
chloride. One monito �ng location is at the creek outlet, just downstream of
Brooklyn Center at 45 Avenue. The other location is just upstream of Brooklyn
Center, at Zane Avenue. Monitoring data since 1998 in general show that all
pollutant loads increase in a downstream direction from Zane to Humboldt.
TS, DS, TSS, and VSS are all within typical values published for the Twin
Cities metropolita.n area, but should be reduced to protect the Mississippi
River downstream.
Fecal coliform, dissolved oxygen, and metals and contaminants are now
being monitored because there is concern about these pollutants in urban
areas.
Shingle Creek is currently impaired for chloride because USGS
monitoring has indicated chloride levels in excess of the MPCA sta.te
standards.
4.3.2.3 Shingle Creek Channel Assessment
General Summary
A profile survey of Shingle Creek was completed in 1998. In most areas the banks were
stable and well vegetated, and no severe erosion was detected. Some minor erosion was
detected where vegetation had exposed roots, but that is unlikely to be a major source of
sediment to the creek.
4.3.2.4 Groundwater Resources
Specific Brooklyn Center Issues
Brooklyn Center has nine wells in the Jordan Aquifer, which provide all of the City's
water. The MPCA Metro baseline study found that the Jordan aquifer has good-quality
water with low concentrations of dissolved solids. However, the City's Wellhead
Protection Plan indicates that the aquifer has a high vulnerability to contamination due to
rapid infiltration rates through the upper layers of the subsurface geology.
4.3.3 Clean Water Act Assessments
Twin Lakes and the portions of both Shingle Creek and the Mississippi River that are within the
City limits are listed on the state impaired waters list. Known as the 303(d) list from the
applicable section of the federal Clean Water Act, these waters are ones that do not currently
meet their designated use due to the impact of a particular pollutant or stressor. If monitoring
and assessment indicate that a waterbody is impaired by one or more pollutants, it is placed on
the list. At some point a strategy would be developed that would lead to attainment of the
applicable water quality standard. The process of developing this strategy is commonly known
as the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) process and involves the following phases:
1. Assessment and listing
2. TNIDL study
3. Implementation plan development and implementation
4. Monitoring of the effectiveness of implementation efforts
City of Brooklyn Center 4-6
Local Water Management Pdan
Responsibility for implementing the requirements of the federal Clean Water Act falls to the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. In Minnesota, the EPA delegates much of the program
responsibility to the state Pollution Control Agency. Information on the MPCA program can be
obtained at the following web address: http://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/tmdl/index.html. The
following is an excerpt from the MPCA website describing the program and its need:
The Clean Water Act requires states to publish, every two years, an updated list of
streams and lakes that are not meeting their designated uses because of excess pollutants.
The list, known as the 303(d) list, is based on violations of water quality standards and is
organized by river basin. Environmental organizations and citizen groups have sued the
EPA because states have not made adequate progress to meet Section 303(d)
requirements. The EPA has been sued for various reasons. Over the past 10 years,
lawsuits have been filed in 42 states and the District of Columbia. Of those, 22 have been
successful. There is currently no such lawsuit in Minnesota. However, beyond the federal
requirements, there are many reasons for us to move forward with the development of
TMDLs. Foremost is the need to clean up our rivers, streams and lakes to maximize their
contributions to the state's economy and quality of life and to protect them as a resource
for future generations.
For each pollutant that causes a water body to fail to meet state water quality standards,
the federal Clean Water Act requires the MPCA to conduct a TMDL study. A TMDL
study identifies both point and nonpoint sources of each pollutant that fails to meet water
quality standards. Water quality sampling and computer modeling determine how much
each pollutant source must reduce its contribution to assure the water quality standard is
met. Rivers and streams may have several TMDLs, each one determining the limit for a
different pollutant.
Table 4.2 lists the 303(d) impaired waters within the City of Brooklyn Center.
Table 4.2
303(d) 2004 Final List of Impaired Waters
within the City of Brooklyn Center
TMDL
Year �sessment Pollutant or start/
Water Body First Unit ID Affected Use Stressor TMDL
Listed complete
Twin (all) 1998 Aquatic Mercury FCA, 1999/2011
consumption PCB FCA
Twin-Middle 2002 Aquatic Excess nutrients 2003/2005
recreation
Twin-North 2002 Aquatic Excess nutrients 2003/2005
(Upper) recreation
Mississippi 1998 07010206-509 Aquatic Mercury FCA, 1999/2011
River consumption PCB FCA
Shin�le Creek 1998 07010206-506 AQUatic life Chloride 2002/2006
City of Brooklyn Center 4-7
Local Water Management Plan
Shingle Creek 2004 07010206-506 Aquatic life Low Oxygen 2004/2006
Shingle Creek 2006 07010206-506 AQuatic life Invertebrate IBI 2013/2015
Notes: FCA stands for Fish Consumprion Advisory and is thus not an independent pollutant or stressor.
Source: MPCA
The absence of a waterbody from the 303(d) list does not necessarily mean the waterbody is
meeting its designated uses. It may be that it has either not been sampled or there is not enough
data to make an impairment determination. Additionally, where mercury is identified as a
stressor, the TMDL approach will be regional in nature as mercury is most commonly an air-
borne pollutant.
A Chloride TMDL study for Shingle Creek and a Nutrient TMDL study for Twin Lakes have
been completed for the watersheds. The study findings are summarized below.
4.3.3.1 Chloride TMDL Report for Shingle Creek
Shingle Creek was listed on the Federal Clean Water Act's 303(d) list of impaired waters for
exceeding the chloride standard for aquatic life in 1998. Shingle Creek was listed as impaired for
chloride after limited sampling of chloride completed in 1996 by the USGS at their discharge
monitoring station at the Queen Avenue bridge in Minneapolis.
The report identi�es major sources of chloride to Shingle Creek as being from nonpoint sources
including road deicing, commercial and industrial deicing, and fertilizer application. Because
the most sensitive time for chloride in Shingle Creek is identified as the winter flow, the TMDL
implementation plan focuses primarily on ice and snow removal issues.
The implementation plan for reducing chloride in Shingle Creek consists of:
1. Reducing salt on the road by adjusting application rates, calibrating equipment, and
evaluating new techniques and products.
2. Covering deicer stockpiles and storing them on impervious surface
3. Training operators who salt roads on the importance of using less product
4. Stockpiling snow away from sensitive areas
5. Continuing researching salt alternatives
6. Increasing public education and private applicator education
7. Monitoring implementation of policies and BMPs
8. Follow-up monitoring along Shingle Creek
4.3.3.2 Nutrient TMDL Report for Twin Lakes
The Twin Lake chain of lakes was listed on the Federal Clean Water Act's 303(d) list of
impaired waters for exceeding the nutrient standard for aquatic recreation in 2002. The lakes are
also on the 303(d) list for fish consumption, but a TMDL report has not yet been completed for
mercury and PCB.
The report identifies major sources of nutrients to Twin Lakes as being from nonpoint sources
City of Brooklyn Center 4-8
Local Water Management Plan
including stormwater, fertilizers, and Wetland 639W, which has become a major source of
phosphorus.
The implementation plan for reducing nutrients in Twin Lakes consists o£
Twin Lake All Basins
1. Community outreach and education regarding lake water quality
2. Aquatic plant management and harvesting
3. Shoreline restoration
4. Goose management
5. Street sweeping will be conducted along City streets two times per year, with one additional
sweep as schedule and resources are available.
Unner Twin Lake
1. Rough fish removal
2. Water quality ponds in watershed 3
3. Water quality pond maintenance
4. Grit chambers
5. Restoration of DNR wetland 639W
6. Shoreline restoration to improve runoff filtration
7. Promoting infiltration in direct runoff watershed
Middle Twin Lake
1. Shoreline restoration to improve runoff filtration
2. Promoting infiltration in direct runoff watershed
City ofBrooklyn Center 4-9
Local Water Management Plan
5. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
5.1 General
The Implementation Plan section of the Brooklyn Center LWMP describes those activities and
programs the City proposes to develop toward improving its surface water management program.
Since Brooklyn Center is considered fully developed, capital outlays for the trunk sewer system
have already occurred so a majority of future outlays will be for upgrades and replacement.
Typically, costs for upgrades and replacement would be borne by either the stormwater utility
fund or would be recovered through direct special assessment. Given this, a typical financing
mechanism developed in most LWMPs, an area charge, is not a part of the Brooklyn Center
LWMP.
Section 5 also includes:
An overview of the City's NPDES permit.
A discussion of operation and maintenance procedures and strategies.
Financial considerations.
Implementation priorities.
A discussion of the process for amending this Plan.
5.2 NPDES Permit
In 2003 the Minnesota Pollution Control A enc re uired the Ci to submit an NPDES Permit
g Y 9 tY
Application to minimize the discharge of stormwater runoff pollutants and authorize stormwater
discharge from the City's municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4).
The MPCA also required the City to prepare and submit a Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Program (SWPPP). The SWPPP identifies a combination of stormwater Best Management
Practices (BMPs), including education, maintenance, control techniques, system design and
engineering methods, and such other practices, both existing and planned, determined
appropriate to meet the NPDES Permit requirements.
The Brooklyn Center SWPPP includes 19 BMPs in the following categories or Minimum
Control Measures:
Public Education and Outreach
Public Participation and Involvement
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
Construction Site Runoff Control
Post-Construction Runoff Control
Pollution PreventionJGood Housekeeping
Each year of the 5-year permit cycle, the City must conduct an Annual Public Meeting and
submit an Annual Report to the MPCA which summarizes:
,lS� Ciry of Brooklyn Center 5-1
Local Water Management Plan
1. The status of compliance with Permit conditions;
2. Assessment of the appropriateness of the BMPs;
3. Progress towards achieving the measurable goals for each of the minimum control
measures;
4. Stormwater activities planned for the next reporting cycle;
5. A change in any BMP or measurable goals for any of the minimum control measures; and
6. A notice that the City is relying on another entity to satisfy some of the Permit
obligations (if applicable).
The BMPs listed in the SWPPP are a legally enforceable part of the Permit. The City must
complete the tasks and milestones to remain authorized to discharge stormwater into waters of
the state. The LWMP Implementation Plan provides assistance and guidance for specific BMP
implementation.
5.3 Operation and Maintenance
5.3.1 Activities
A stormwater system is a major investment for the City of Brooklyn Center both in terms of
initial capital cost and ongoing maintenance costs with meeting ongoing maintenance costs
being the City's current challenge. Typically, system maintenance is funded by the City's
stormwater utility and through the general fund.
The City's stormwater system maintenance responsibilities include the following:
Street sweeping
Cleaning of sump manholes and catch basins
Repair of catch basins, manholes, and pipe segments
Assessing pipe condition (typically by televising)
Inspection of storm sewer inlet and outlet structures
Pond mowing and other vegetation maintenance
Excavation of accumulated sediments from ponds
The City has maintained its pipe system for decades and staff has a strong grasp on the costs
associated with this. As redevelopment brings more ponds into the system, City staff will find
that pond maintenance becomes an increasingly large portion of both staff time and maintenance
budget. It is important to quantify the extent of this future commitment so that the funds
necessary for pond maintenance activities can be collected via the City's stormwater utility. For
this reason, the City has commissioned a separate report concurrent with this update to the
LWMP detailing a long-term management strategy and capital improvement plan for
maintenance of existing stormwater ponds.
The management of stormwater ponds is facilitated by creation of a GIS database for all
stormwater system infrastructure. Through the City's NPDES permit, the City has completed
mapping its system in this software. Ultimately, the City will reference via interactive mapping
its maintenance records and maintenance costs for the stormwater system.
City of Brooklyn Center 5-2
Local Water Management Plan
5.3.2 Stormwater Basins
Stormwater basins represent a sizable investment in the City's drainage system. General
maintenance of these facilities helps ensure proper performance and reduces the need for major
repairs. Periodic inspections are performed to identify possible problems in and around the
basin. Inspection and maintenance cover the following:
Basin outlets
Basin inlets
Side slopes
Illicit dumping and discharges
Sediment buildup
Basin Outlets
A key issue with stormwater basins is ensuring that the outlets perfortn at design capacity.
Inspection and maintenance of basin outlets address the following:
The area around outlets is kept free and clear of debris, litter, and heavy vegetation.
Trash guards are installed and maintained over all outlets to prevent clogging of the
downstream storm sewer.
Trash guards are inspected at least once a year, rypically in the spring, to remove debris
that may clog the outlet. Problem areas are addressed more frequently, as required.
Emergency overflow outlets are provided for all ponds when possible. These are kept
clear of debris, equipment, and other materials and properly protected against erosion.
Basin Inlets
Inspection and maintenance of basin inlets address the following:
Inlets are inspected for erosion.
Where erosion occurs near an inlet, energy dissipaters or riprap are installed.
Inlets are inspected for sediment deposits, which can form at the inlets due to poor erosion
practices upstream.
Where sediment deposits occur, these are removed to ensure design capacities of storm
sewers entering the basin are maintained.
Side Slopes
Inspection and maintenance of basin side slopes address the following:
Side slopes are kept well-vegetated to prevent erosion and sediment deposition into the
basin. Severe erosion along side slopes can reduce the quality of water discharging from
the basin and require dredging of sediments from the basin.
Noxious weeds are periodically removed from around basins.
Some basins in highly developed areas require mowing. If mowing is performed, a buffer
strip of 20 feet or more adjacent to the normal water level is typically maintained. 'This
provides filtration of runoff and protects wildlife habitat.
City ofBrooklyn Center S-3
Local Water Management Plan
Illicit Dumping and Discharges
Inspection and maintenance of illicit dumping and discharges into basins address the following:
Basins are periodically inspected for evidence of illicit dumping or discharges. The most
common of these is dumping of yard waste into the basin.
Where found, illicit material is removed, and signs are posted as needed prohibiting the
dumping of yard waste.
Water surfaces are inspected for oil sheens. These can be present where waste motor oil is
dumped into upstream storm sewers.
Skimmer structures are installed as needed at outlet structures to prevent oil spills and
other floatable material from being carried downstream.
Skimmer structures are periodically inspected for damage, particularly from freeze-thaw
cycles.
Pond Inspection and Maintenance Program
A pond inspection and maintenance program is currently being developed by the City. Thirty
ponds will be inspected, and an implementation plan for maintaining the ponds will be
developed. This will include general maintenance, sediment removal, cost estimates, and a
schedule for implementation.
5.3.3 Sump Manholes and Sump Catch Basins
Sump manholes and sump catch basins are included in storm sewer systems to collect sediments
before they are transported to downstream waterbodies. These structures keep sediments from
degrading downstream waterbodies. Once sediments are transported to a lake or pond, they
become much more expensive to remove.
Sediments originate primarily from road sanding operations, although construction activity and
erosion can also contribute. Since these structures are designed to collect these sediments, they
are routinely cleaned to provide capacity for future sedimentation. Suction vacuum equipment is
typically used.
5.3.4 Storm Sewer Inlet Structures
To fully utilize storm sewer capacity, inlet structures are kept operational in order to get runoff
into the system. All efforts are made to keep catch basins and inlet flared ends free of debris and
sediments so as not to restrict inflow and cause flood damage. Leaf and lawn litter are the most
frequent cause of inlet obstructions. On a routine basis, City staff visually inspects inlet
structures to ensure they are operational.
5.3.5 Open Channels and Ravines
Overland flow routes constitute an important part of the surface water drainage system. Open
channels are typically vegetated and occasionally lined with more substantial materials. The
lined channels typically require little or no maintenance. Vegetated channels are periodically
inspected and maintained, as high flows can create erosion within the channel.
City ofBrooklyn Center S-4
Local Water Mana e Plan
g ment
Eroded channels can contribute to water quality problems in downstream waterbodies as the soil
is continually swept away. If not maintained, the erosion of open channels would accelerate and
the repair would become increasingly more costly. The erosions of channels is accelerated when
these are at steep gradients and are used for conveying urban stormwater.
5.3.6 Piping System
The storm sewer piping system constitutes a multimillion-dollar investment for the City. The
City performs a comprehensive maintenance program to maximize the life of the facilities and
optimize capital expenditures. The following periodic inspection and maintenance procedures
are followed:
Catch basin and manhole castings are inspected and are cleaned and replaced as
necessary.
Catch basin and manhole rings are inspected and are replaced and/or regrouted as
necessary.
Catch basin and manhole structures are inspected and are repaired or replaced as needed.
Pipe inverts, benches, steps (verifying integrity for safety), and walls are checked.
Cracked, deteriorated, and spalled areas are grouted, patched, or replaced.
Storm sewer piping is inspected either manually or by television to assess pipe condition.
Inspection items include root damage, deteriorated joints, leaky joints, excessive spalling,
and sediment buildup. The piping system is programmed for cleaning, repair, or
replacement as needed to ensure the integrity of the system.
5.3.7 De-Icing Practices
Minnesota receives approximately 54 inches of snow during a typical year. This requires a large
amount of de-icing chemicals (primarily salt) to be applied to roads and sidewalks each winter.
Estimates indicate that a significant portion of the environmental damage caused from de-icing
chemicals can be a result of inadequate storage of the material (MPCA 1989). Improper storage
as well as overuse of salt increases the risk of high chloride concentrations in runoff and
groundwater. High chloride concentrations can be toxic to fish, wildlife, and vegetation. The
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has identified Shingle Creek as an impaired water for
chloride.
The following procedures are being implemented to reduce chloride loading:
1. De-icing material is stored in waterproof sheds.
2. Road de-icing stockpiles are not located near municipal well areas or in other sensitive
groundwater areas.
3. The City is replacing ice control fleet with equipment with higher efficiency
applicators.
Brooklyn Center has established a"Snow Ice Control Operations Policy" to address winter
maintenance needs. Street conditions are assessed for each individual event and ice control
material application is adjusted accordingly. Equipment is maintained in good working order to
�y City ofBrooklyn Center 5-S
Local Water Management Plan
place ice control material on roadways and is properly calibrated to prevent excessive
application. The City is also investigating the purchase of new salt application equipment to
assist in minimizing the volume of salt that is applied to roadways for ice control purposes.
5.3.8 Street Sweeping
Street sweeping is an integral part of the City's effective surface water management system. It
greatly reduces the volume of sediments that have to be cleaned out of sump structures and
downstream waterbodies. The City follows a standard practice of performing street sweeping
along all local streets three times per year. The first time is in the spring, beginning in either late
March or early April after the risk of later snowfall has passed, the second occurs mid-summer,
and the third sweep occurs in the fall after leaf fall.
Brooklyn Center does not allow residents to rake leaves into the street for municipal pickup.
Hennepin County and the City encourage residents to compost their yard waste. If residents
desire to have yard waste removed by their private hauler, then compostable bags or reusable
containers are required. Alternately, yard waste can be brought to the Maple Grove yardwaste
site which is free for residents of Brooklyn Center. Overall the City's approach to minimizing
organic matter entering its stormwater system greatly reduces the incidence of inlet blockages
and protects the water quality of downstream waterbodies.
The objective of the City's street sweeping and de-icing programs is to minimize impacts from
leaf litter, sand, salt and other debris on the surface waters of the City.
5.3.9 Detection of Illicit Connections
During routine inspection for inlet grates, outfalls, and other portions of the stormwater system,
City staff also looks for evidence of illicit discharge, dry weather flow (indicating possible
sanitary sewer connections), sedimentation and other non-point source pollution problems.
As part of its SWPPP, the City will review any existing illicit discharge ordinances and policies,
and develop and implement an illicit discharge action plan.
5.4 Implementation Priorities and Programs
This section describes those activities and programs that are priorities for the City to implement
to im rove its surface water mana ement ro am. These items are enerated from the SWPPP
P g P g
known water resource related problems in the City, and the SCWM WMC Second Generation
Watershed Management Plan. A tentative timetable and cost estimate for each activity or
program is included in Table 5.1. A description of each activity follows the table. Ongoing
operation and maintenance activities detailed in Section 5.3 are also included in Table 5.1. Items
under the section titled SWPPP are efforts the City is taking to comply with the current NPDES
permit. Priorities will be adjusted as the NPDES permit is revised in the future.
Implementation plans for TMDLs have not been completed as of the writing of this LWMP.
T1VIDL implementation strategies may result in future adjustments to the Best Management
Practices included in the City's SWPPP upon approval of the TMDL implementation plans.
Ciry ofBrooklyn Center S-6
Local Water Management Plan
I
Adjustments to the requirements set forth in this LWMP may be needed based on future
revisions to the City's SWPPP.
Table 5.1
Implementation Priorities
Implementation Priority Tentative Date for Tentative Cost
Implementation
Water Quantity
59th Ave. and Camden Ave. Storm Sewer 2006 32,000
Feasibility Study
Shingle Creek Parkway Stortn Sewer 2008 35,000
Modifications
SWPPP I I
Storm Sewer Base Map and GIS System with 2007 50,000
Record Retention
Illicit Discharge Ordinance and Policy 2006 5,000
Review/Action Plan
Pond Inspection and Maintenance Plan 2006 28,000
SCWM WMC Second Generation Watershed
Mana�ement Plan Requirements
Wetland Functions and Values Assessments 2008 23,270'
Operation and Maintenance
Street Sweeping Ongoin� 70,000
Pond Inspection and Maintenance Implementation Ongoing
Water Quality BMP Clean-out (sumps, grit Ongoing 56,000
chambers)
`Includes a full MnRAM 3.0 field assessment on 35 wetlands within the city.
Z To be determined as part of 2006 Pond Inspection and Maintenance Plan
5.4.1 Water Quantity Problems
59th Ave. and Camden Ave. Storm Sewer Feasibility Study
City staff and residents have observed frequent flooding at this intersection and in the backyards
of homes along Camden Avenue in this area. The trunk storm sewer does not provide adequate
conveyance capacity for the drainage area. A feasibility study is currently being completed for
the storm sewer in this area.
Shingle Creek Parkway Storm Sewer Modifications
Currently a large capacity pipe in the pond system around city hall allows Shingle Creek to flow
through the City storm sewer system and into the Mississippi River during large storm events.
The storm sewer was not designed to carry the Shingle Creek overflow, so eliminating the high
flow diversion will return the storm sewer system to its intended design.
City ofBrooklyn Center 5-7
Local Water Management Plan
5.4.2 SWPPP Priorities
Storm Sewer Base Map and GIS System with Record Retention
The City has developed GIS mapping of the stormwater conveyance and management system,
which includes ponds, streams, lakes, wetlands, City-owned pollution control devices, pipes, and
outfalls. The next step will involve integrating the City's records of operations and maintenance
of these stormwater features into a database that interfaces with the existing GIS system.
Illicit Discharge Ordinance and Policy Review/Action Plan
The City will review any current illicit discharge policies and ordinances and develop action
steps to efficiently detect and eliminate illicit discharges.
Pond Inspection and Maintenance Plan
As discussed in Section 5.3.2, the City is in the process of developing a long-term management
strategy and capital implementation plan for maintenance of existing stormwater ponds serving
City property and right-of-way for local roadways. Recommended maintenance schedules and
practices resulting from the study will be programmed into the budget for the City's Stormwater
Utility to the extent possible.
5.4.3 SCWM WMC Second Generation Watershed Management Plan Requirements
Wetland Functions and Values Assessments
A functions and values assessment for wetlands is required by the Second Generation WMP.
Cities must undertake functions and values assessments for those wetlands identified in the
Commissions' Water Quality Plan (WQP) as being high priority for analysis according to the
schedule set out in the WQP and the balance of wetlands as opportunities arise. The SCWM
WMC Water Quality Plan indicated that Brooklyn Center has 615 acres of high priority
wetlands. These wetland areas are shown in Figure 7. The functions and values assessment will
use a standard assessment survey tool such as MnRAM 2.0 or 3.0 to perform a detailed
evaluation of a wetland's hydrology, water quality, vegetation, and habitat. The City plans to
complete this assessment in accordance with Table 5.1.
5.5 Financing
The total average annual cost for operating and maintaining the City of Brooklyn Center's
stormwater drainage system is approximately $1,680,000 including capital and depreciation
expenses. This includes stormwater management programs, SWPPP activities, systems
operation and maintenance, and construction of future improvements and enhancements.
Funding for the City's stormwater system currently comes from the City's stormwater utility.
City of Brooklyn Center S-8
Local Water Management Pdan
LIlv. ���1� .�i�^�'x"�,jPiT�� w f i sFi�� I 4
tk,. t,yi w+"`��' .cv �i .""-�-r�F,ty�-r� r i:�y;y�°i, y'�,�^ A( i�' S y. F�
���t, p`P' d �rl�r�¢'��'f� f''*..� �w "si•,i� �.r.
��`z�R.` r� .�t�"'' f+� e a L tw f 'o k �.'o, 1 Al�°"�
I �r w, v. �Y A._ i�-.1 i
T� �'�17�7 ;�:�i�lY��.nr �`i �y,MeE'...�i ,A �v
e e s�,� d �r St r' a
r 5 h .tp I ?h€?Iq. y/4` k4�. i i �'�ki�.t..
=r d,. y y r r' w� .t.<�.� :�aY tt y 1�` e r ,:����r r.
ar �Pa �y a. `7: ��y .r
�7 {a t/ 4`1� �"�f�! 1 �a I":t' i
ti s. �j�'`z� �-i� A r.�" F Y x 5
tn w.. r�� ..-e�'�
i J� X�. f �.:r. r 0. rf 'T A J{
G �y. A3 r �,H.,�� �'7f�.. ��.��q°r�� t���
�+-'b`. f �f c }�y,{,`t-S-' T ,i i
s 1 �y, i��"�,� d kst 4
L�
t�"r'(� 3 a�t �7• ,$i r `�..e A -j.�-�•� e a k j 1 Y i
a
�r�. M 1%' �k�i�
s r
g st".
3r' ��"'�iF'�''1➢R s.. ,t� ,�r, �.>1... ..,�E� ,y
;z,� 1. J 1 �+cN �t j <d
i y-
0 4< �j L b s Y '•3� �i�t�i,�4T"1": r �f li t i '��r t Y b.
�y
1 ��r
y 5tta�S d 'Y'E�i�"''�l;�.. �'.�,(q�,'�'.�n.lrf�� Q e�, P 'y� I. 1 t V.;- F� .iTS' f�
y y r_ :�il�':�i R`!r, x L r��-, e,i�.�' .`f.. }'1 G ����a�� Y I..� 'Fs.- �i�
GDS'�"��;� �.-t ��,gr.. AL� .���i;?#yt'�4: �tX� ��i. """._t' w ,l -I a �.��w .afA�g;:. �.a
�r,fs `n r ���'A��`� ��R?5� r l! •4. Sx r t
M.i �I I
:p� 2R:Y �r 'iW;4,.���."e IC:�� ��1� j{ il�! M' I ��r� 3 y 'I:�. .'R' ...c"
t.1t Jl�. M �jYx,e •Y �1l� .�R -F i 4 T rt i.4
!i1' I d ,M j i
ke�, �rt� `1; y ���'w���� �t L.i,h r i� j I I
1 ,��ii?� i 1i�i�' �s, ,K A�` �j I
V V.�,�R •����Y _S�'�1�y_� .L, 1. �i! l a�
ii7 1`�; l l.7�� y r -f' n i f 7 '1
A� ;e s �`�i�� W+ w 1
a �3�r 1 q] f •J
c. �1�� p i W �e 'i '�ti�' �ti �'��`i��,��l�1. /I w'y,�• ��i
4fir t�5 H,1' i •f �.1;, t
'r��:. 'd�� �r=;� k�• v
i ,}j 2 .,5 ��i ,aia� a� i r i f
1 Y• •S' d�� '.:ti» 'i .�a'k. ?�t y t �h'
4bb 4 Y y 3
r.��� s:
y.� n a a v
M .::�t �,'r a,r<� .�M '4��� t �E� >p v�-��,-
�.v� ��„4>- #r i�-
WQP Priority Wetlands E �:r
i
y y``�� F�" r` t t 1 1 m�s;
1- Seasonall Flooded t Y �t: �,F� c t -•r (!1: r�
2 Wet Meadow ira*�r r��° u 'z 1; ii
t'l�, ��f; t r ,:�:r �,Y n. i
I I 'd.:� Y4T j F�:'����� 1+� �y' yy� f�, E ��+1
3 Shallow Marsh t 7�. 3ti 3�1 y�
i 2f H��S2� 1 4 l' 7
4- DBep MHISh r �4 a i?fi, i�` k'- n'��'"c�;<• a'�. r i. �Y �al�-'�:
�!N s �v �v
I i f Z �t t a d
5 Shailow Open Water r�, �.-:�".,�.u`� r'� c� d ,e u
�t r;� ►r.� 4 i q
6 Shrub Swamp y 1;' r y i2r�q'•t d y k: r"= i 3:
a+. y� P t
lf YM �y {T-��.� 's�b j y�#[t
I 7 Wooded Slivamp tt .dQ._� :,l .5= f. d `'x
F i�
1 IL t 4 ���,r� 'A��:.. �,..7�7 l�i��
90 Riverine vi �,�!��a:i:� ,K
�d 11 t� 2 {e 4 r' f '3
i�7!V%1d����i:4�� ..�e�E�.,. i I �M 15 l �l4! .ia� a
•�w
L:\1240�1240-221apr1aerials witli_weUands\Flgure: Brooklyn Cerder
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi WMC Wenck MAY 2004
WenckAseodetes,Inc. 1800PioneerCreekCenler Figure7
Priority Wetlands for Functions and Values Assessments: Brooklyn Center E�rv al EngineeB Meple Rein, MN 5535&0249
5.6 Amendment Procedures
The Brooklyn Center LWMP is intended to extend through the year 2016. For the plan to remain
dynamic, an avenue must be available to implement new information, ideas, methods, standards,
mana ement ra i 'n n andlor results of the
g
ct ces and an other chan es that ma affect the i te t
P Y g Y
LWMP. The amendment procedure for the LWMP is presented below.
Reauest for Amendment
Written request for Plan amendment is submitted to City staff. The request shall outline the
need for the amendment as well as additional materials that the City will need to consider
before making its decision.
Staff Review of Amendment
A decision is made as to the validity of the request. Three options exist: 1) rejectthe
amendment, 2) accept the amendment as a minor issue, with minor issues collectively added
to the Plan at a later date, or 3) accept the amendment as a major issue, with major issues
requiring an immediate amendment. In acting on an amendment request, City staff shall
recommend to City Council whether or not a public hearing is warranted. Major
amendments to the Plan will have to be submitted to the watersheds for review and approval
prior to formal action by the Council.
Council Consideration
The amendment and the need for a public hearing shall be considered at a regular or special
Council meeting. Staff recommendations should also be considered before decisions on
appropriate action(s) are made.
Public Hearin� and Council
This step allows for public input based on public interest. Council shall determine when the
public hearing should occur in the process. Based on the public hearing, the City Council
could approve the amendment.
Council Adontion
Final action on an amendment is City Council adoption. However, prior to the adoption, an
additional public hearing could be held to review the Plan changes and notify the appropriate
stakeholders.
It is anticipated that the City's LWMP will remain in effect through 2016. The City will then
review the LWMP for consistency with current water resource management methods. At that
time, all annual reports and past amendments will be added to the document. Depending on the
significance of changes, a new printing of the LWMP may be appropriate.
City of Brooklyn Center 5-10
Local Water Management Plan
6. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 Summary
The Brooklyn Center LWMP will serve as a comprehensive planning document to guide the City
in conserving, protecting, and managing its surface water resources. The LWMP meets
requirements as established in Minnesota Rules 8410. In addition, the Plan reflects the
requirements of the watersheds with jurisdiction within the City.
The Brooklyn Center LWMP has its own particular emphasis, which includes:
Collecting and compiling the efforts of agencies and organizations including the City, its
departments and residents. This includes past reports and studies, management plans,
monitoring studies, as well as completed and proposed improvement projects.
Reviewing the current state of the City's surface water resources in the context of goals
and policies, ordinances, operations and maintenance, flood mitigation, and achievement
of targeted water quality levels in its surface waterbodies.
Establishing reasonable, achievable and affordable goals, and supporting them by a strong
regulatory and management culture. Developing an implementation plan that includes
projects and processes that derive from a thorough assessment of current City problem
areas and current City surface water regulations and controls.
Recommending ordinance implementation to cover gaps between goals and actual
practice.
The review of the City's surface water resources begins with an evaluation of its surface water
management goals and policies. Section 3 of the Plan provides the City's current goals and
policies to achieve these goals. Some new policies have been developed to reflect the changing
regulatory climate while other new policies have been developed to simply improve the City's
management strategy.
The System Assessment section of the LWMP serves two functions. The first part of the section
describes the City's surface water management system. This system is shown on Map 1. The
map indicates the major drainage divides, storage areas, conveyance (including pipe and
channels), wetlands and lakes in the City. The system assessment portion catalogues the various
assessments of problems that the Plan must address. The intent is to identify the source of
problems and specific actions the City proposes to take to address these problems either
independently or in collaboration with some other organization most commonly one of the
watershed management organizations.
Finally, this Plan develops implementation priorities for the City. The Implementation Plan
section of the Brooklyn Center LWMP describes those activities and programs the City might
develop toward improving its surface water management program. Since Brooklyn Center is
largely developed, capital outlays for new trunk sewer systems have already occurred so future
outlays will be for upgrades and replacement. Typically, costs for upgrade and replacement
would be borne by either the stormwater utility fund or would be recovered through direct
special assessment.
City ofBrooklyn Center 6-1
Local Water Management Plan
The Implementation Plan section also includes:
An overview of the City's NPDES permit
A discussion of operation and maintenance procedures and strategies
Financial considerations
Implementation priorities
A discussion of the process for amending this plan and an annual report to council
6.2. Recommendations
The City of Brooklyn Center Local Water Management Plan is submitted to the City Council
with the following recommendations:
That the recommendations toward standardization contained herein be followed.
That the City continue to operate its surface water system in accordance with this LWMP.
That the City continue to foster a sense of common purpose among itself and the
watershed organizations within the City.
That the City adopt this Local Water Management Plan and implement amendments to it
as deemed necessary.
Ciry ofBrooklyn Center 6-2
Local Water Management Plan
A endix A
pP
Minimum Engineering Standards for
Stormwater Conveyance and Management
City ofBrooklyn Center AppendixA
Local Water Management Plan
Minimum Engineering Standards for
Stormwater Conveyance and Management
City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
1. Stormwater Runoff Conveyance
A. Stormwater drainage system design shall be based on a 5-year frequency storm
for local storm sewer, 10-year frequency storm for trunk storm sewer, and a 100-
year frequency storm for ponds and open channels. The design storms shall be as
defined in the U.S. Weather Bureau's Technical Paper 40. Common values for
rainfall intensity are as follows:
5-year Frequency 10-year Frequency
"Tc" Intensitv (in. hr Intensity (in. hr
15 4.00 4.65
18 3.76 4.29
20 3.60 4.05
_r_.
22 3.44 3.89
24 3.28 3.73
26 3.12 3.57
28 2 96 3.41
30 2.80 3.25
B. Storm sewers and open channels shall be designed using the Rational Method or
other technical method approved by the City. Runoff Coefficient "C" shall be in
accordance with the guidelines provided in the Minnesota Department of
Transportation Drainage Manual.
C. Emergency overflow drainage routes shall be provided at all low point locations a
minimum of 1.5 feet below the lowest adjacent building opening. Emergency
overflow drainage routes shall be constructed in a manner that will accommodate
a 100-year storm event.
2. Stormwater Rate Control
A. A hydrograph method based on sound hydrologic theory shall be used to analyze
runoff rates and high water levels for proposed development and redevelopment
projects.
B. Runoff rates for proposed development and redevelopment sites shall not exceed
existing runoff rates for the 2-year, 10-year and 100-year critical storm frequency
event or rates noted in the approved local water management plan. Runoff rates
may be restricted to less than the existing rates when necessary for the public
City of Brooklyn Center Appendix A
Local Water Management Plan
health and general welfare of the watershed or where restricted downstream
capacity exists.
C. Analysis of flood levels, storage volumes and flow rates for waterbodies and
detention basins shall be based on a range of rainfall and snow melt duration
producing the critical flood levels and discharges. Hydrologic analysis shall
include a study of runoff rates for a 24-hour duration storm event.
D. The high water levels of stormwater detention facilities shall be based on a
minimum 100-year frequency storm event. A minimum freeboard of two (2) feet
shall be provided for the lowest adjacent building open.
E. Emergency overflow routes shall be provided for all detention basins. The
elevation of emergency overflow routes shall be a minimum 1.5 feet below all
adjacent building openings. Emergency overflow drainage routes shall be
constructed in a manner that will accommodate a 100-year storm event.
F. Various design guidelines contained in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual may be
required at the discretion of the City based on specific site conditions.
G. The maximum side slope of detention areas or open channel shall be 1:4
(Vertical:Horizontal).
H. Adequate access for future maintenance of stormwater detention facilities,
including easements, grading and elimination of obstructions shall be provided.
I. The owner of a detention basin, water quality pond or water quality treatment
device shall provide the City with an executed copy of an Agreement for
Maintenance and Inspection of Utility and Storm Drainage Systems in a form
acceptable to the City.
J. Infiltration best management practices shall be incorporated into the drainage
design for development and redevelopment project areas. Infiltration practices
shall provide for the infiltration of one-half inch of runoff from impervious
surfaces and must be capable of infiltrating said volume within 72 hours.
Examples of acceptable infiltration practices include infiltration trenches,
rainwater gardens, and infiltration basins. Infiltration shall not be provided for
runoff from fueling and vehicle maintenance areas or for runoff from industrial,
commercial and institutional parking lots. Infiltration practices shall not be
installed in areas with less than 3 feet separation from the bottom of the
infiltration system to the elevation of seasonal high groundwater; in areas with
less than 5 feet separation distance from the bottom of the infiltration system to
the elevation of seasonal high groundwater for locations receiving runoff from
public and private roadways; areas within 400 feet of a community water well or
within 100 feet of a private well; and in areas located within the Drinking Water
Supply Management Area of the City of Brooklyn Center or any other
City ofBrooklyn Center AppendixA
Local Water Management Plan
community's Drinking Water Supply Management Area that extends into the
corporate boundary of the City of Brooklyn Center.
3. Stormwater Quality Treatment Ponds
A. Development and redevelopment projects in excess of one (1) acre or more in size
shall incorporate water quality treatment ponds or other effective measures to
minimize the discharge of sediment and other stormwater related pollutants from
the site. This requirement may be waived by the City if the site drains to an
existing regional stormwater management facility that was designed to
accommodate the water quality treatment requirements of the proposed land
development project. Infiltration, wetland buffers and erosion control practices
may still apply.
B. Water quality treatment ponds (wet ponds) shall be designed in accordance with
National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards and other specific standards
as established by the City of Brooklyn Center.
C. Water quality treatment ponds shall have an elongated shape (preferably a 3:1
length to width ratio) and be sized with a permanent wet pool volume equal to the
runoff from a 2.5-inch storm event generated from the tributary drainage area
(when practical as determined by the City of Brooklyn Center).
D. The ground surface slopes immediately adjacent to ponds shall be less than 25%
but greater than 0.5 to 1% to promote flow towards the pond. Ground surface
slopes adjacent to the pond shall terminate on a submerged aquatic bench (a
shallow slope area just inside the pond perimeter) to prevent people from slipping
into the deep water portion of the pond and to facilitating the growth of aquatic
plants.
E. The aquatic bench shall extend into the pond from the normal water level a
minimum of 10 feet and shall be sloped at a grade of 1:10 (V:H).
F. The aquatic benches shall be landscaped to prevent access to the pond.
G. The ground surface slopes within the pertnanent pool (below the aquatic bench)
shall not exceed 1:3 (V:H).
H. Permanent pool depth shall be a minimum of four feet and maximum of 10 feet at
the deepest points.
I. The pond outlet shall be equipped with removable trash racks to prevent clogging
by large debris and to restrict access to the interior for safety purposes. The pond
outlet shall not permit access by small children or unauthorized persons.
City ofBrooklyn Center Appendix A
Local Water Management Plan
J. Warning signs prohibiting swimming, skating, and fishing shall be posted near the
perimeter of wet detention basins.
K. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated over newly constructed
stormwater management ponds.
4. Wetlands
A. Wetlands may not be drained, filled, or excavated without prior approval from the
Shingle Creek or West Mississippi Watershed Management Commission in
accordance with the Wetland Conservation Act.
B. A vegetated buffer strip with a minimum buffer width of 20-feet and an average
width of 30-feet measured from the ordinary high water level of the watercourse
or wetland is required adjacent to wetlands, lakes and natural water course.
C. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated over wetland buffer areas.
5. Floodplain Management
A. Existing water storage capacity should be preserved below the 100-year critical
flood elevation on all public waters within designated floodplain areas.
B. Development within the floodplain should be minimized that will unduly restrict
flood flows or aggravate known high water problems.
C. Compensatory storage will be required for floodplain fill.
City of Brooklyn Center Appendi.z A
Local Water Management Plan
ib .a Y?
'e
J f
m h f
l.. d i;"
k
Y �C',�� 4
�X
Y�S�.. ?t. S A i
v.':
i.
t I
k 1
f v c�
h u<y
t
u°f c., t
s
a a f 3 S wr f x
t �W'�.. C� .t.�: "�::a
`�.s... s a
z ::�.r
s�
E�
L e� hiu
h X k i.'.
5 �i.
Z {y
k �.ri �§2� t
l e, �is
fi t s�
kd i �f 4
s
t
t
S L 'i fi
r
��h
r
t s c, "t. k k
s
.�3 R i
t
f K-'
t
k:
k .'m
...i:.
k Y fi B ;3
i' 6 y. �'a$ 4
�`c k N �rt�'� f `v b
5 f 4
a .2
n y
y '�c'�
rt
a r �.a �'''?,'s
u r d
't f �l 4
fi'
t �f
2 fi
5
9 y �.L
a... 1
i
t -w" I
x F y d S ,ht 7'�" y. f l k
4�, I �,J' 1 I 1
.n f 2 y �+�?���+��.,�Rw ��wR" �����M�I .�r g �S��+R������ "���Id�� y
t
r
ry f. F .,_��s?�
r� 2
df A i
y
A �b
k f l' 1� 'k
.�'k. t�
'�'b. 4.''�'
_2 k k.
e l
a
N
3.
4k
t
y y
i
8 4� t l x 2 `x
E.
e" rv, 4 4
3 4
k
r
t 1 U''
v
a
r �'v
t
x u` z
t t
E s f
t
b t
�L Y a
2 2 T �P` I
m�
`�k
z 3 w
s
a L y
t t
x t t�
g, .c a `E
Y
F 3 F �xst
1'
3'
fi Y. �tc„
Y
y 2 y
3 S'
K X
k 2.
2
.s e r
I
n r
k
Y: M j
s�
t r
:t ...r`� y
z
f x �'2 c
s
f
f
+.�`v p
L
d
z<
4
r
�i. y't,..z 4 4 L�
5
a �1'e
t
t
3 x
4'
3m
t: t ts,
�R
x s r
7
s
xe
k k Z S k:
F i
k y
a y
y
x
9
...,.u, 4.: .......�w t
F,,.�,.,
There are no materials for this item.
e' 'iL'v Y
�'fi �:'4 d. t ..'v`�� n
�2 i
3 dS A
�ti�
b z�
?t i 4
w
d t F I".�r x
t f
4.�4� f
w
s
k t
t.. Y E.' S
r M
k
R 'c k .�sw v
z
f
t 3
z
t X fi 1
R
�s
4 Y
J `n
a
I
Y2 x,
i a r
f A Y `vn ?,:�*S b�..
k
s s e�, t r..� z
4.'-
x
5 t n
Y t
s rr
z, f
i, z r=_. t
R
a �,a x �v
2??. 3�: r z, t
r �c' "�fl'
d a.
t x�
E`� �g
..:E f �v-:
s
':�rf r n t t
ri Y 4' �i 4
s
i 2 f u
d
I
�l Y A
F k ..Iz.'i y n 'l `m.`
Y` �'��L. z'� .:`'Y
''u 3'i x S 9
f r 'i
v�
S r 5 '.3 'v`.�. `x k
1 iS' I Y
�;i. f
4
C 4�����
u
4
k•w i
f; s ,�z: s� x
:r:`�"
x.,
x `k
z; s' r :.rr '.'n a
.hx
�f
i a� z w
1
u �n r �-v
ts
r s
l
s,a,
a,
k Y
l
Z 'c f
h .i '4 f r`> '4" 2, C.
1
.X f �'k k 'f
tb. Y'r'� 3' k
t t €3�
s
k
r z
s
i y X Y f 2� k 'X**, Y�i `Y f
"3, 5 v`�^�. F
fi� t
X
�i i �i t
L c, t :'E
fi
I S.�' E.s�
l
l:.
3 3 fi
f
S t°
J �.F�'� d a?' 4
l i 4, 1
t�' v^�. x e
z
<4
y
f
u"�
r '.7 c
`v t k .i%� 5'
2`^ d f �,v. 4 y
i k
S�, I
x, a' 4,
v'
a: fi`
s:�: r
y E
m `4..
z t x
s ,i'r e i f �i' �r
�fi
t r
s,< r
f
t s s e a i
i'
3
r
t
x
x
�Y Rx; 1
3
5� a z :t .�3
�3�:
h
l'. N
f y Y
7 '�t
t
y' F E K 'X x< 'a>
F
s *4 3
2 4 "z`
I A
t
,3 ti"*
...i c,.....�. .++.t....... ......,h�'�...... .....e.,.v ...a..:.#�
�r .w.,.
There are no materials for this item.
I