HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007 06-11 CCP Regular Session AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
June 1 l, 2007
6:00 P.M.
City Council Chambers
A copy of the full City Councrl packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at
the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary.
1. City Council Discussion of Agenda Items and Questions
2. Miscellaneous
3. Discussion of Wark Session Agenda Items as Time Permits
4. Adjourn
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
City of Brooklyn Center
June 11, 2007 AGENDA
1. Informal Open Forum With City Council 6:45 p.m.
provides an opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the
agenda. Open Forum will be limited to 15 minutes, it is not televised, and it may not be used
to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political endorsements, or
for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with
citizens. Questions from the Council will be for clarification only. Open Forum will not be
used as a time for problem solving or reacting to the comments made but, rather, for hearing
the citizen for informational purposes only.
2. Invocation 7 p.m.
3. Call to Order Regular Business Meeting
—The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting.
A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is
located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary.
4. Roll Call
5. Pledge of Allegiance
6. Council Report
7. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda
—The following items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by
one motion. There will be no separate discussion ofthese items unless a Councilmember so
requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at
the end of Council Consideration Items.
a. Approval of Minutes
1. May 29, 2007 Joint Work Session with Crystal
2. May 29, 2007 Regular Session
3. May 29, 2007 Work Session
4. June 4, 2007 Joint Work Session with Financial Commission
b. Licenses
c. Resolution Declaring Earle Brown Days as a Civic Event from June 21 through
June 23, 2007
8. Presentations/Proclamations/Recognitions/Donations
a. Resolution Expressing Appreciation for the Donation of James and Lori Dean in
Support of the Brooklyn Center Community Center
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- June 11, 2007
9. Public Hearing
None
10. Planning Commission Items
a. Planning Commission Application No. 2007-009 Submitted by Brooklyn Center
Church of the Nazarene. Request for Special Use Permit and Site and Building Plan
approvai for a three phase church addition and parking lot expansion at 501 73rd
Avenue North. The City Council tabled this item on May 14, 2007, and requested
the Planning Commission's review and comments on a proposed landscape screening
plan along the west property line. The Planning Commission recommended approval
of this application at its May 31, 2007, meeting.
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to approve Planning Commission Application No. 2007-009 subject
to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission.
11. Council Consideration Items
a. An Ordinance Amending Chapters 3 and 4 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter;
Sections 3.11 and 4.04
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to approve first reading of ordinance and set second reading and
Public Hearing for July 9, 2007.
b. Resolution Acce tin the Com rehensive Annual Financial Statement for the Year
P g P
Ended December 31, 2006
•Requested Council Action:
Motion to adopt resolution.
c. Resolution Approving Final Plat for Lincoln Crossing
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
d. Resolution Declaring a Public Nuisance and Ordering the Removal of Diseased
Trees
•Requested Council Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
12. Adjournment
Rain Banels
Muuieapolis is helping ou do our }xirt to protect the envn•onment
Rain bairels save water and reduce pollution in storm drains and �-ou can get them at half price
March 19, 2D07 (MINNEAPOLIS) The Cit� of Minneapolis is making 2,000 rain bai�rels available to
Minneapolis households this summer at a reduced cost. When connected to a downspout, the 55-gallon
t�in ban store rainw�ster fbr later use. Rain ban help protect the environment bJ° reciucing water
consumption and cutting dawn on �unoff that ends up in ow lakes and sti�eams. The baiYel connects to a
standard garden hose so it's eas� for folks to use them to urigate lawus and gardens.
Mumea�wlis is makuig ilie barrels available tl��l:s to a$100,00� �a��uit fi flie Envu�omuental Protection
Agenc}'s Region 5 Great Cities Program and in partnership with Minneapolis/Metro Blooms and the Green
Instit�ite.
The cost of a rain barrels is $45, which is about half their normal retail price. BaiY�els are available to
Minneapolis residents for use on neapolis properties. and there is a limit of one per household. You
can order the rain ban�els at www.thereusecenter.com or b} phone at G12-724-2G08. Quantities are limited,
so it's a good idea to pre-order.
Starting in Ma� pre-ordered barrels will be available fos pick-up at the ReUse Center at 2801 21 st Ave. S.
Re-Use Center hom�s are Monda}� to Thursda� from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m., Frida} and Saturda} from 11 a.m. to
i p.m., and Sunda} fi I 1 a.m. to 5 p.m., and the center accepts credit ca��ds, checks, or cash.
A lunited number nf rain baixels will also be available for sale and pick up at tluee neighborhaod events:
The ��-gallon �ain b�urels are made of 00 percen! rec� cled plasfiG. Tl�e} are balk� so bring a suitablP
vehicle to pick them up (rain ban•els are 32 inches high and 24 inches wide and weigh 18 pounds).
As part of the program, Minneapolis/Metro Blooms will include rain ban�el information in its Rain Garden
Workshops this }-ear. To sign up for a workshop. call Minneapolis/Metro Blooms at G 12-G73-3014 or visit
its website at http://metroblooms.org.
For rnore information on the rain ban els, just ca11311.
Rec}�cling Water or How to Reduce Runoff
bid ou know that a moderate storm that dumps 1"' of rain produces about G00 gallons of iunoff fi�om a
roof sw of 1.OQ0 square feet'? Imagine the number of rooflops in }�our communit}� and }�ou can quickl}
see how much runoff is headed toward the stoim drains, picking up pollutants common in urban areas
along the wa�-, and headed toward our lakes, streams and rivers. Rain banels are one wa}- of trapping some
of this tvnoff. The}� are not onl}� ecologicatl}� responsible, but the} also help conserve water.
Frequei�t.l� Asked Questions About Rain Bat�els
Is water from a raui b�urel safe for m� g�u�den and lawn''
Yes! Rainwater collected in a rain baii�el is safe for flower and native pianie gardens, and lawns.
While it is safe for flower gardens and lawns, exercise caution when using on food crops.
WiII I save water and mone� b}� installing a iain barrel?
Rain banels are ecologicall} fi However, }�ou ma}� not see a significant cirop in water bill. Rain
barrels help reduce storm water runoff and provide some water for }�om� gazden Rain barrels work best for
small landscape. gardens oa� dire�Jing wate�� lo a rain ga�•den on our prope�7}.
��,t`��"a..�"�t'r %"f F
v
I I
Aluminum Mesh Debris Screen
Barrel top has a strong aluminum mesh
screen, creating a non-corrosive and long
T;� r�° lasting filter. Keeps out leaves, shingle pieces,
dead birds, sticks and other debris thaf comes
off your roof as weil as safely protecting
wildlife and pets from entering or drinking from
barrel. The top screen ring is removable for
easy
Overflow Feature ,;♦F:'�`�` -=-r�;
The overfiow portal on the back of the barrel easily J, i
hooks up to the supplied tubing whieh runs down �f f._� r t
the back of the unit in a protected furrow. The j;
overflow apparatus draws water down and out of G
the bottom front of barrel, diverting excess water
away from the foundation. The back of the barrel is
flat, aflowing space saving and accurate placement T=± �j;
against a walL
.f311` .il! F`
Expansion in Series
In addition to an overflow port and tube (in
blue) which exits to the front of the unit, the
RainCatcher has two in-series spigots to the
left and right (in pink), for unlimited barrel
rr m m D I or ri le r w r
a a e e ts oub e t ou ate
P
9 Y
storage capacity easily with an inexpensive
linkage kit. Overflow water witl automatically
flows into the next barrel, instead of into the
ground or driveway.
Other Great Features
The back of these barrels are flat aAowing for
space saving and accurate placement against a
wall or fence. Additianally, this design provides
�a
°>-r:
needed stability to lessen the possibility of tipping
I Ktr
over. The plastic spigot (threaded for future
extension to a standard garden hose) attaches to a
flexible hose (included) that connects to a frontal
��fi.:
port at the bottom of the barrel (see top
photographs for details).
32" H x 24 W
55 gallons
18 Ibs when emPtY
made from recycled polyethylene
green or brown
Conta�t Information Telephone Toll Free: 1-877-440-724b FAX 30b-778-6436
P�tal add�s Box 202 Swift CI�n�LS1� C.anada S9H 3V6
E-�1 gazde°arrre@t2-net
OASIS RAIN COLLECTION SYSTEM
How many times have you watched a river of rai�vat� nm down the drivevvay, and into the storm sewer, or even
worse into your baseme�? Wate.� is most preciaus r�onroe, and poss�b2y tbe o� most taken for giant�. Water
covers 75% of the earth's surface, y�t only 17°!0 of the warld's water supply is available for nse by people and animals.
Ttte time 2�as come for ns to find soludi�s for rising water oosts, str� water systems, and dwindling resources..
wasted rain running down the drain our water supQlies are at risk!
There are so many benefits in hacvesting rainwater! 1i is the best water available for plants...
soft, pure, aerated, perfect temperatiII�e and FREE!
Yoube nodced how landsc�pes are qoidc to hun green and lash ai�er a heatthy shower.
GardenWare Canada has created the Oasis Collection SystemTM to offer homeowners a product line that is:
Easy To Use: Equipped with brass spigots ttrdt a�rden hose or s�ker hose can be attached to,.to run water into
watering cans, or outlying areas to keep shrub beds,lrePS etc watered...even when yai're away on holidays! Screen lid
keeps out debris, the crverlow outlet lds you attach a 1.25 Inch hose to redirec excess water. A� the Oasis weighs only
20 lbs...easy for cleaning auci off-season storage almost anywhere!
Quality Const�uciton: Crar�enR�are Canada has built t�e Oasis to last Flearible poly consiruction resists premature
brittleness and cracking. UV ray resi� prevents oobr fading Brass �igots were chosen for looks and durability, as
were the pvc scrcen and rn�erIlow outlet T� Oasis has the potentiai to last for years and years.
Good Lookin'! More people are apt to re-cycle rainvvater if they pn choose a prodUCt that has aesthetic appeal!
The 'vase-shape' and fimsh a�l to your pm�perty...choose fram greenstone and whitestone, forest green and
terra cotta to match your home!
The Oasis Rain Coflectian SystemT� is in the name of Gart�eaWare Canada Distributors Ltd. by: Canadian
Ind�strial Design Pate,nt Re�n #45424 8c #96661, a�d in the Umted Statites bp: U.S. I�sign Patent: D448, 909
Gardenware Canada is looking for U.S. Distributors, give us a call!
i
-�t r u�.��.�
m.
y
M_��_
���1 I
rt�
.�_t
j
Y :,.�#-�w
tl ���r �a. p �r
x �i a�� �ii�i 7 r",
7 t'
l:
/G
J
�k
J v
r r
z i
s,
x
r"
s
s "f
i
c }A�' 9
y
F�
ry i 1
3
y
J
l v' ''F� y f:
f�
K
;F
f
J
t SJ
t 1 e'
f f
f� ,/f
x
.i�
s
5
z
,::s
t
s
z x
4
S
t'
x
'3 l
j l �I
F�
b f
N r':
f
j ���"7T�^ �M?� A .�3
%�e.'�
1 E ..i �IM .�i'�"��� 4 M����������4 ��M�-�
y�
Z
t.
i
J
r�
F
1
4. f a.
n
J
r
l
J �Yl d
i.: i .:u
:i i
k e
J'.
r
t
p
Y
F
T y
l
S
V^
f
l
J
X
Y y
.�t
x
I
U f
f
f
r
b f f
:t. ti
F
y
6..
n4
�4
_r l .i
e
f
J
w
:4
f
f'..'
t
J
y
tT
Y J
�F
L
i
z
x
x`
s
S`
F
......t.:: r
L
J 4
Office of the City Clerk
City of Brooklyn Center
A Millennium Community
MEMORANDUM
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Camille Worley, Deputy City Clerk
DATE: June 11, 2007
SUBJECT: COLTNCILMEMBER O'CONNOR: Requested Change to Minutes
Councilmember O'Connor requested the following change to the Work Session minutes of May
29, 2007:
Pa�e 2
An opinion was expressed that the water tower is an icon of the City and should be preserved.
There was also an opinion expressed that the water tower does not need to be �a� painted
this year and therefore �s paintin� should be delayed. There was discussion on the
possibility of the tower collapsing, grant expiration, and increase in repair costs.
(�r•rl�ee� indicates matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.)
n er Phone TDD Number
6301 Shin le Creek Parkwa Recreation and Communit Ce t
g y y
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400
City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434
FAX (763) 569-3494
www.cityo fbrooklyncenter.org
r
EBHC WATER TOWER REPAIRS CITY MANAGER
Mr. Boganey explained that the prior City Council discussed this item. and included it in the 2407 Budget.
He explained that the water tower at the Earle Brown Herita.ge Center is in a condition that warrants
removal or repairs within a reasonable amount of time. He stated an engineering firm assessed the damage
and concluded the repairs to cost approximately $204,000. He sta.ted a grant application was submitted for
half the assessed amount, however the grant was only approved for $?5,000, leaving $129,000 to be paid by
the EBHC. He explained that a second firm assessed the water tower and reported an estunated repa.ir cost
of approximately $60,000, however the estimate for chromium abatement and repainting the tower is
$100,000, raising the total repairs to an estimated $160,000. He explained that with the $75,000 grant still
available, the City's share would be approximately $80,000. He stated based on the fact that the water
tower is an important iconic emblem for the farm and adds to the historical character, if it can be preserved
for $80,000, it would be a worthwhile investment from Staf�s standpoint.
An opinion was expressed that the water tower is an icon of the Ci az�d hould be preserved. The e was
also an opinion expressed that the water tower does not need to be��` ��t 's year and therefor aa:-�-,
should be delayed. There was discussion on the possibility of the tower collapsing, grant expiration, and
increase in repair costs.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to direct Mr. Boganey to place this item on the regular
agenda for City Council consideration.
2008 SHINGLE CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION PROPOSED BUDGET
Mr. Boganey explained that the proposed operating budget for 2008 is $292,760, which does not exceed the
cap however is the maYimum amount allowed. He sta.ted Watershed Commissioner Carmody stated she felt
all items in the budget were appropriate. He stated staff feels the budget is necessary in order for the
Commission to reach its goals. He stated anticipation in receiving the West Mississippi Budget in the near
future. He stated he would provide information regarding the chloride prewetting grant in the update.
There was an opinion expressed that the budgeted amount is excessive.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to accept the budget as proposed because the Shingle
Creek Watershed Management Commission has followed the guidelines set forth by the City CounciL
Mr. Boganey stated the West Mississippi Watershed Management Commission's budget will be brought to
the City Council upon receipt.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan moved and Councilmember/Commissioner O'Connar seconded
adjournment of the City CounciUEconomic Development Authority Work Session at 8:53 pm.
Motion passed unanimously.
OS/29/07 -2- DRAFT
i
Office of the City Clerk
City of Brooklyn Center
A Millennium Community
MEMORANDUM
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Camille Worley, Deputy City Clerk �`Iv�.�P l9t�C�i!�
v
DATE: June 11, 2007
SUBJECT: COLTNCILMEMBER LASMAN: Requested Change to Minutes
Councilmember Lasman requested the following change to the Joint Meeting with the Crystal
City Council minutes of May 29, 2007:
Pa�e 1
I The Brooklyn Center City Council met in a Joint Meeting with the Crystal Gity Council at City
Hall called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Kav Lasman T�m �x'�"�^� at 6:00 p.m.
I Mayor Pro Tem Kav Lasman T;m and Councilmembers Tr°�� r �°m�r Mary O'Connor,
Dan R an, and Mark Yelich. Also resent were Cit Mana er Curt Bo ane Public Works
Y P Y g g Y
Director/City Engineer Todd Blomstrom, and Deputy City Clerk Camille Worley.
I Mavor Tim Willson was absent and excused.
(�l� indicates matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.)
I
I 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone TDD Number
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400
City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434
FAX (763) 569-3494
www.cityo fbrooklyncenter.org
r
Camille Worley
From: Curt Boganey
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 2:50 PM
To: Camille Woriey
Cc: Sharon Knutson
Subject: FW: minutes correction
FY!
From: Kay Lasman
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 2:05 PM
To: Curt Boganey
Subject: minutes correction
Minutes from May 29th Joint Session with Crystal-Meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Kay Lasman; roll Call
should say, Mayor Pro Tem Kay Lasman instead of Councilmember and Mayor Tim Willson should be listed as absent
and excused.
1
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
1N THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
JOINT MEETING of BROOKLYN CENTER and CRYSTAL CITY COi1NCILS
MAY 29, 2007
COUNCIL/COMMISSION CONFERENCE ROOM
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in a Joint Meeting with the Crystal City Council at City
Hall called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Mary O'Connor, Dan Ryan, and Mark
Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Todd Blomstrom, and Deputy City Clerk Camille Worley.
Crystal members present were Mayor ReNae Bowman, Councilmembers Mark Hoffmann, Dave
Anderson, Lindsay Krantz, Garry Grimes, Joe Selton, and Laurie Ann Moore. Also present were
City Manager Anne Noris, and Public Works Director/City Engineer Tom Mathisen.
INTRODUCTIONS
OPENING REMARKS
Mayor Pro Tem Kay Lasman welcomed the City of Crystal to the City of Brooklyn Center.
City of Crystal Mayor ReNae Bowman stated the City of Crystal is interested in discussing
various projects with the City of Brooklyn Center.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
BASS LAKE ROAD
City Manager Curt Boganey stated the restriping of Bass Lake Road was the topic that triggered
the joint meeting between Brooklyn Center and Crystal City Councils. He discussed the open
house held for residents of Brooklyn Center and Crystal.
Hennepin County representatives Robert Byers and Gregory Schneider displayed a map of
Brooklyn Boulevard from Brooklyn Boulevard to HWY 81 and distributed traffic statistics. The
concerns expressed at the open house were discussed along with the benefits and disadvantages
of both a three-lane roadway and a four-lane roadway.
OS/29/07 -1- DRAFT
It was indicated that a three-lane road provides operation benefits for drivers and a four-lane road
may be chaotic for turning, however the four lane road would satisfy the needs of the Cities
longer. The existing traffic volumes were discussed where it was indicated that 14,000 trips per
day has been the constant volume since the three-lane road was constructed.
There was discussion on the characteristic of collisions on Bass Lake Road within a five-year
period. It was indicated that half of the 115 collisions within the five-year period were rear-end
incidents, possibly due to maneuvering when entering the turn lane.
There was discussion on the effects of speeding on the number of accidents. It was indicated that
a three-lane road brings a tighter band and reduces the number of excessively fast or slow
drivers. It was indicated that County Road 70 has not seen a significant reduction in speed since
the improvements were completed; however an overall improvement was seen. It was also
indicated that County Road 10 will work well during off-peak hours; however some issues will
remain during peak hours.
There was discussion on the proposed 6%2-foot shoulder that will accommodate disabled
vehicles, delivery trucks, buses, and other uses.
There was discussion regarding the removal of approximately half the bus stops to assist in
delays, and it was indicated that the reduction in bus stops has proved beneficiaL
Mr. Snyder discussed the details of the overlay. He explained that a three-lane road would
consist of overlaying only the existing roadway, keeping the bituminous material from the
gutters. He explained that if a four-lane road was to be constructed, the curb boxes would have
to be removed and replaced. He discussed the signalization of Regent Avenue and the fixed
overlay budget. He stated the concept of three lanes has been discussed for several years and
explained the difficulty of changing to a four-lane road after the overlay has been completed. He
stated the overlay of the three-lane road would last approximately ten years.
There was discussion by both City Councils, City Staff, and Hennepin County representatives
that included the following: left turn lanes, concerns expressed at the informational meeting, age
of existing surface being 20-30 years with patches only, process to change the road to four lanes
which would be to mill off the new overlay and apply new overlay, future improvements to curb
boxes, traffic counts on SOth Street being 16,000-17,000 per day, adjustments from original
concepts, and increasing delays on side streets.
DEER MANAGEMENT
Mr. Boganey gave a brief overview of the Deer Management Plan in Brooklyn Center. He stated
the three goals of the program are: Education, Enforcement of Ordinances, and the Annual Deer
Hunt. He explained that the City is divided into three different areas based on deer habitat,
totaling 950 acr�s of deer habitat. He explained that the Department of Natural Resources has
indicated that 15-20 deer per square mile of deer habitat is reasonable in an urban area. He
discussed the aerial survey that determined the placement of the deer in Brooklyn Center. He
stated there were 117 deer in Brooklyn Center in March 2002, 108 in March 2003, 81 in March
OS/29/07 -2- DRAFT
2005, 56 in March of 2006, and 40 in March 2007. He stated 40 deer is still in excess of the
recommended 15-20 deer per square mile of deer habitat. He stated many deer are located in the
Airport and Crystal's park properties. He stated Brooklyn Center is interested in gaining the
ability to move into Kylawn Park to access the deer.
It was indicated by the City of Crystal City Council that the matter would be discussed at a future
Work Session.
TRAIL SYSTEMS
There was discussion on adding a trail along County Road 81 upon completion of improvements,
along with a trail along Bass Lake Road and potentially along Regent Avenue, through Crystal
into Brooklyn Center.
It was indicated that trail systems should be considered during the forming of Comprehensive
Plans.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember O'Connor seconded adjournment of the
meeting at 6:55 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
Crystal Councilmember Grimes moved and C stal Councilmember Selton seconded
rY
adjournment of the meeting at 6:55 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
OS/29/07 -3- DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
MAY 29, 2007
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER 1NFORMAL OPEN FORUM
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor Pro Tem
Kay Lasman at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Pro Tem Kay Lasman and Councilmembers Mary O'Connor and Dan Ryan. Also present
were City Manager Curt Boganey, Public Works Director/City Engineer Todd Blomstrom, Planning
and Zoning Specialist Ron Warren, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Deputy City Clerk Camille
Worley.
Mayor Willson and Councilmember Mark Yelich were absent and excused.
Mayor Pro Tem Kay Lasman opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum.
O Tim Roche, 816 69�' Ave N, discussed garbage collection at the Metro Transit bus stop and stated he
has collected two bags of garbage at the stop and offered to maintain two garbage cans at the bus
stop. He discussed the tall grass at Humboldt Square Condominiums and requested that they be
required to maintain the property adequately. He discussed Humboldt Square and stated the property
is in poor shape, including the landscaping. He stated concern with the murder in his neighborhood
and stated he is embarrassed to be a resident of Brooklyn Center.
Councilmember O'Connor stated Diane Sannes from the Riverwood Neighborhood is organizing an
"Adopt a Bus Stop" program and suggested that Mr. Roche contact her.
Councilmember O'Connor moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the Informal Open
Forum at 7:12 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
2. INVOCATION
Mayor Pro Tem Kay Lasman offered a moment of silence as the Invocation.
3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Kay
Lasman at 7:15 p.m.
OS/29/07 -1- DRAFT
i
4. ROLL CALL
Mayor Pro Tem Kay Lasman and Councilmembers Mary O'Connor and Dan Ryan. Also present
were City Manager Curt Boganey, Public Works Director/City Engineer Todd Blomstrom, Planning
and Zoning Specialist Ron Warren, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Deputy City Clerk Camille
Worley.
Mayor Willson and Councilmember Mark Yelich were absent and excused.
5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
6. COUNCIL REPORT
Councilmember Ryan reported attending the Housing Commission meeting with the City Manager
and Mayor Tim Willson where various items of concern were discussed. He stated the Housing
Commission will be providing its expertise and feedback regarding proposals from Staff for Code
Enforcement and improvement of Ordinances.
Councilmember O'Connor reported attending the Cable Commission meeting, Park and Recreation
Commission meeting, and the Earle Brown Days Board of Directors meeting. She stated Earle
Brown Days is from June 21 to June 23 with the parade on Thursday evening and a Pancake
Breakfast sponsored by the Lions Club at Applebee's on June 16.
Councilmember Lasman stated she would defer her Council Report until the next City Council
meeting.
7. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember O'Connor seconded to approve the Agenda and
Consent Agenda as amended, with the removal of Item No. 7c. from the Consent Agenda to Item
No. lle. under Council Consideration, with amendments to the May 14, 2007 Regular Session
minutes, and the following consent items were approved:
7a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. May 14, 2007 Board of Appeal and Equalization
2. May 14, 2007 Study Session
3. May 14, 2007 Regular Session
4. May 14, 2007 Work Session
5. May 21, 2007 Work Session I-694/HWY 100 Redevelopment
7b. LICENSES
AMUSEMENT DEVICES
Torrence Enterprises Inc.(Brookdale) 2067 West San Bruno, Fresno, CA
Metro Coin of N, Inc. (Community Center) 149040 —B 28�' Ave, Plymouth, MN
OS/29/07 -2- DRAFT
MECHANICAL
B& D Plumbing 4145 McKenzie Court, St. Michael
I Anderson Heating and Air 4347 Central Ave NE, Columbia Heights
Planergy Construction LLC 710 Commerce Dr, Woodbury
RENTAL
Renewal
(There were no calls for service for the following)
6018 Admiral Pl (Single Family) Lutheran Social Service of MN
5301 Dupont Ave N(1 Bldg, 1 Unit) Spencer Ung
5224 65th Ave N(Single Family) Nick Morris
3101 67th Ave N(Single Family) Xong Lee
S609 Bryant Ave N(Single Family) Randy Archer
4210 Lakebreeze Ave N(1 Bldg, 4 Units) James Bobbie Simons
7137 Grimes Ave N(Single Family) Shawn Banks
Initial
(There were no calls for service for the following)
1336 68th Ln N(Single Family) Soye Chalte
TEMPORARY ON-SALE 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIOUOR
St. Alphonsus Catholic Church (June 23, 2007) 7000 Halifax Ave N
Motion passed unanimously.
8. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
There were no Presentations/Proclamations scheduled for this meeting.
9. PUBLIC HEARING
9a. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES
REGARDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LAND
(NORTHWEST OF T.H. 252 AND 66TH AVENUE NORTH)
City Manager Curt Boganey stated the item was first read on Apri123, 2007; published in the official
newspaper on May 3, 2007; and is offered this evening for second reading and Public Hearing. He
explained that because the final plat has not been filed with the County, a motion to table adoption of
the Ordinance until the filing is complete is requested.
Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember O'Connor seconded to open the Public Hearing.
Motion passed unanimously.
No one wished to address the City CounciL
Councilmember O'Connor moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the Public Hearing.
Motion passed unanimously.
OS/29/07 -3- DRAFT
Councilmember O'Connor moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to table adoption of the
Ordinance until the plat is filed with Hennepin County.
M
otion passed unammously.
10. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
10a. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2007-010 SUBMITTED BY GREG
A. NELSON. REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO
EXPAND THE MINNESOTA MARTIAL ARTS ACADEMY LOCATED AT 6840
SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION AT ITS MAY 17, 2007,
MEETING.
Planning and Zoning Specialist Ron Warren discussed the information presented in the staff report.
Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember O'Connor seconded to approve Planning
Commission Application No. 2007-010 subject to the following conditions recommended by the
Planning Commission:
1. The amended Special Use Permit is issued to Greg A. Nelson on behalf of Minnesota Martial
Arts Academy, Inc. as an instructional use in martial arts, a strength and conditioning
operation far training and athletic performance and chiropractic services specializing in
health, education, injury prevention, personal and public safety. No other use, not
comprehended by this application shall be permitted. Any further expansion or major
alteration to the use shall be subject to an amendment to this Special Use Permit.
2. The Special Use Permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances and regulations. Any
violation thereof may be grounds for revocation.
3. Tenant improvement plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with
respect to applicable codes through the building permit process.
4. Special Use Permit approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to the provisions of
Chapter 34 of the city ordinances and the city's sign policy with respect to 69�` Avenue
North.
Motion passed unanimously.
11. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS
lla. LICENSING HEARING FOR BROOKDALE FORD MOTOR VEHICLE DEALER
LICENSE
Mr. Boganey stated the applicant requested that the item be tabled until the June 25, 2007, City
Council meeting.
Councilmember O'Connor moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to table License Hearing for
Brookdale Ford Motor Vehicle Dealer License until the June 25, 2007, City Council meeting.
Motion passed unanimously.
OS/29/07 -4- DRAFT
llb. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-80 DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING
THE REMOVAL OF DISEASED TREES
Mr. Boganey introduced the item and stated the purpose of the proposed resolution.
Councilmember Ryan moved and Mayor Pro Tem Lasman seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO.
2007-80 Declaring a Public Nuisance and Ordering the Removal of Diseased Trees.
Councilmember O'Connor voted against the same. Motion passed.
llc. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-81 RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2007-75 AND
ADOPTING CORRECTED RESOLUTION RESCINDING ASSESSMENT OF
UNPAID UTILITIES TO 5903 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH
Mr. Boganey introduced the item and explained that the $30.00 filing fee was not included in the
total amount reflected in Resolution No. 2007-75.
Councilmember O'Connor moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO.
2007-81 Rescinding Resolution No. 2007-75 and Adopting Corrected Resolution Rescinding
Assessment of Unpaid Utilities to 5903 Emerson Avenue North.
Motion passed unanimously.
lld. AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY: STx
STREET NORTH LOCATED SOUTH OF 67 AVENUE NORTH
Mr. Boganey introduced the item and stated the purpose of the proposed ordinance.
Councilmember O'Connor moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to approve first reading of
ordinance and set date and time for second reading and Public Hearing for June 25, 2007.
Motion passed unanimously.
lle. (Formerly Consent Agenda Item No. 7c) RESOLUTION NO. 2007-82 APPROVING
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2, ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND
AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2006-11,
CONTRACT 2006-E, CENTRAL/SALT STORAGE BUILDING
Councilmember O'Connor stated she will vote against approval of the item due to the cost of the
facility.
Public Works Director/City Engineer Todd Blomstrom provided a brief summary of the Central/Salt
Storage Building project. He discussed the use of the old salt storage facility and removal of park
buildings. He discussed changes in storm water regulations regarding the use of salt.
Councilmember Ryan moved and Mayor Pro Tem Lasman seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO.
2007-82 Approving Change Order No. 2, Accepting Work Performed and Authorizing Final
Payment, Improvement Project No. 2006-11, Contract 2006-E, Central/Salt Storage Building.
Councilmember O' Connor voted against the same. Motion passed.
OS/29/07 -5- DRAFT
12. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember O'Connor moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded adjournment of the City
Council meeting at 7:41 p.m.
Motion assed unanimousl
p Y
OS/29/07 -6- DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
I WORK SESSION
MAY 29, 200'7
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council/Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Work Session called to
order by Mayor Pro Tem/President Pro Tem Kay Lasman at 7:44 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Pro Tem/President Pro Tem Kay Lasman and Councilmembers/Commissioners Mary O'Connor and
Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Community Activities Recreation and Services
(CARS) Director Jim Glasoe, Chief of Police Scott Bechthold, and Deputy City Clerk Camille Worley.
Mayor/President Willson and Councilmember/Commissioner Mark Yelich were absent and excused.
SOCIAL SERVICE PRESENTATIONS CITY MANAGER
REACH FOR RESOURCES MARY PERKINS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Mary Perkins, Reach far Resources, discussed the purpose of the Adaptive Recreation Program being to
assist those with cognitive disabilities with participation in the City's Park and Recreation programs.
A PowerPoint Presentation was presented on the services provided by Reach for Resources that summarized
the following information: Humble Beginning, Our Clients (children and adults with cognitive disabilities),
Our Mission, Service Departments, Community Living Support, Life Skills Education, Mental Health
Services, Therapeutic Recreation, Recreation Services, Participant Feedback, and Your Funding.
Ms. Perkins distributed statistics from the Brooklyn Center programs, newsletters, brochures, and budget
analysis. She discussed the programs offered and those that the funding from Brooklyn Center helps to
provide.
PROJECT PEACE TINA MARCHIO
Tina Marchio Pro'ect Peace disc P'
ussed the ro�ect Peace Program and services provided. She summarized
the following information: 24-hour Crisis (1,042 calls per year), cell phone collection, internship program to
gain experience in victim services, history of Project Peace, serviced cities, number of domestic cases
handled (5,000 per year), reduction of hospital and home visits, calls from Brooklyn Center residents, and
translation services.
Katie Devney, Project Peace, discussed the process of obtaining an Order for Protection/Restraining Order,
number of calls from the Crisis Line requesting an Order for Protection, waiver of court fee for orders for
protection, and the program budget.
OS/29/07 -1- DRAFT
EBHC WATER TOWER REPAIRS CITY MANAGER
Mr. Boganey explained that the prior City Council discussed this item and included it in the 2007 Budget.
He explained that the water tower at the Earle Brown Heritage Center is in a condition that warrants
removal or repairs within a reasonable amount of time. He stated an engineering firm assessed the damage
and concluded the repairs to cost approximately $204,000. He stated a grant application was submitted for
half the assessed amount, however the grant was only approved for $75,000, leaving $129,000 to be paid by
the EBHC. He explained that a second firm assessed the water tower and reported an estimated repair cost
of approximately $60,000, however the estimate for chromium abatement and repainting the tower is
$100,000, raising the total repairs to an estimated $160,000. He explained that with the $75,000 grant still
available, the City's share would be approximately $80,000. He stated based on the fact that the water
tower is an important iconic emblem for the farm and adds to the historical character, if it can be preserved
for $80,000, it would be a worthwhile investment from Staff's standpoint.
An opinion was expressed that the water tower is an icon of the City and should be preserved. There was
also an opinion expressed that the water tower does not need to be repaired this year and therefore repairs
should be delayed. There was discussion on the possibility of the tower collapsing, grant expiration, and
increase in repair costs.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to direct Mr. Boganey to place this item on the regular
agenda for City Council consideration.
2008 SHINGLE CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION PROPOSED BUDGET
Mr. Boganey explained that the proposed operating budget for 2008 is $292,760, which does not exceed the
cap however is the maximum amount allowed. He stated Watershed Commissioner Carmody stated she felt
all items in the budget were appropriate. He stated staff feels the budget is necessary in order for the
Commission to reach its goals. He stated anticipation in receiving the West Mississippi Budget in the near
future. He stated he would provide information regarding the chloride prewetting grant in the update.
There was an opinion expressed that the budgeted amount is excessive.
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to accept the budget as proposed because the Shingle
Creek Watershed Management Commission has followed the guidelines set forth by the City Council.
Mr. Boganey stated the West Mississippi Watershed Management Commission's budget will be brought to
the City Council upon receipt.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan moved and Councilmember/Commissioner O'Connor seconded
adjournment of the City Council/Economic Development Authority Work Session at 8:53 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
OS/29J07 -2- DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
JOINT WORK SESSION WITH FINANCIAL COMMISSION
JiJNE 4, 2007
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Joint Work Session with the Financial Commission and
was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Kay Lasman at 6:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Pro Tem Kay Lasman and Councilmembers Mary O'Connor, Dan Ryan, and Mark Yelich.
Also present: City Manager Curt Boganey, Fiscal and Support Services Director Dan Jordet, and
Deputy City Clerk Camille Worley.
Mayor Tim Willson was absent and excused.
Others present were Financial Commissioners Philip Berglin, Todd Boster, Mark Nemec, Jessica
Roerick, Susan Shogren Smith, and Rex Newman.
Financial Commissioner Gene Maze was absent and unexcused.
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR 2006
AUDITOR'S OPINION AND AUDIT COMMITTEE LETTER
HLB TAUTGES REDPATH
Andy Hering, HLB Tautges Redpath presented a PowerPoint presentation that summarized the
following information:
Reports Issued
o Opinion on Financial Statements
o Audit Committee Letter
o Report on Internal Control
o Report on Compliance with Minnesota Statutes
Annual Financial Report
o The financial statements are the responsibility of management
o The role of the Independent Auditor is to report on the fair presentation of the
financial statements
o Audit standards followed:
06/04/07 -1- DRAFT
GAAS
GAGAS
o"Clean opinion" on the 2006 financial statements
Financial Results
Budget Performance
o Favorable General Fund budget variances
Audit Committee Letter
o Audit firm responsibility under U.S. audit standard.
o Significant accounting policies
GASB 44
o Accounting estimates
Depreciation expense
Health insurance liability
MCES liability
Land held for resale (LHFR)
o Audit Adjustments
Additional receivable ($93,811)
Adjustrnent to LHFR ($208,000)
Payable for unbilled MCES flows ($580,465)
Grant receivable ($39,784)
o Disagreements with management
o Consultations with other auditors
o Issues discussed prior to retention of auditor
o Difficulties encountered in performing the audit
Report on Internal Control
o The 2006 Report is based on new standard (SAS 112)
o SAS 112 lowered the threshold for reporting of internal control matters and
established new definitions
Report on Internal Control
o Significant Deficiency defined as "a control deficiency that adversely affects the
entity's ability to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report financial data reliably
in accordance with GAAP, such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a
misstatement to an entity's financial statements that is more than inconseauential will
not be prevented ar detected"
o Six deficiencies noted:
Approval of journal entries
Approval of utility billing adjustments
Determination of water consumption
Liquor inventory adjustments
Financial statement corrections
06/04/07 -2- DRAFT
Approval for use of paid time off
There was discussion regarding security of the Liquor Stores including methods to prevent
shoplifting.
State Compliance Report
o Required by Minnesota Statute Section 6.65
o OSA established a task force to develop audit guide for legal compliance
o Audit guide covers seven categories
1. Contracting and bidding
2. Deposits and investments
3. Conflicts of interest
4. Public indebtedness
5. Claims and disbursements
6. Other miscellaneous provisions
7. Tax increment provisions
o No findings of noncompliance for 2006
Recent Standards
o Audit standards
SAS 103 Audit Documentation
SAS 104 to 111 Risk Assessment
SAS 112 Reporting on Internal Control
SAS 113 Omnibus 2006
SAS 114 Auditor Communication to those Charged with Governance
o Accounting standards
GASB 44 Statistical Section
GASB 45 Other Post Employment Benefits
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INFORMATION STAFF
Fiscal and Support Services Director Dan Jordet presented a PowerPoint presentation that included
the following information on the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended
December 31, 2006:
Anatomy of the CAFR
Introductory Section
o Transmittal Letter
o List of Officers
o Organizational Chart
Financial Section
o Independent Auditor's Report (opinion)
o Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD &A)
Government Wide Financial Statements
Fund Financial Statements
06/04/07 -3- DRAFT
o Major funds
o Governmental Funds
o Proprietary Funds
Notes to the Financial Statements
Required Supplementary Information
Combining Individual Fund Statements
o All non-major funds
Statistical Section
Supplemental Materials
o Report on Legal Compliance
o Report on Internal Control
o Audit Committee Letter
Government Wide Staxements
Two Statements
o Statement of Net Assets
o Statement of Activities
Interfund Activity Removed
Total Assets $140,811,395
Total Liabilities 34.705.598
Total Net Assets $106,105,797
i Notes to the Financial Statements
Note 1-Summary of Accounting Policies (Pages 41-48)
o Description of the significant accounting polices and procedures of the City
Note 3-Stewardship, Compliance and Accountability (pages 50-52)
o Excess of Expenditure over Appropriation
o Deficit Fund Equities
Note 4-Capital Assets (page 55)
o Streets, Mains Lines growing with the reconstruction projects every year
Note 4-Long Tertn Debt (pages 59-62)
o Issued $1,460,000 (GO Improvement)
o Paid $2,875,000
General Fund
Designated Fund Balance $7,508,690
o Is 51.62% of 2007 General Fund Budget
Revenues exceeded Expenditures by $284,239
Details in Statement 9 of the Required Supplementary Information
There was discussion on the vacant and City acquired properties and potential developments of
such.
06/04/07 -4- DRAFT
Tax Increment District #3
Lower than Expected Revenues
o Rebate to Brookdale in Tax court case
o About $400,000 taxes plus interest
Olive Garden Cracker Barrel Acquisitions
o $2,949,642
Additional relocation at 57'� Logan
o $513,271
Beginnings of the Days Inn acquisition
o $7,966
Utility Funds
Enterprise Funds
Other Funds
TIF #1 TIF #2 Earle Brov�m TIF District
o Still calculate and reported to State as separate districts
o Closing of TIF 1 in 2008
o Closing of TIF #2 in 2010
Capital Improvements Fund
o Park maintenance and improvements
o Golf Course Loan
Central Garage
o Owns and maintains all vehicles of the City
o Holds reserves for vehicle replacements
2008 BUDGET OVERVIEW
City Manager Curt Boganey presented a calendar of budget events which was discussed by the City
Council and Financial Commission. It was indicated that meetings involving the Financial
Commission should begin at 6:30 p.m. and those involving only the City Council should begin at the
regular time of 6:00 p.m.
OTHER BUSINESS
There was no Other Business discussed.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Yelich moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to adjourn the Work Session at
8:50 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
06/04/07 -5- DRAFT
F
5:.
Y
y f
��r F': f .f
l
l f f
F
F
4 l
y
5
i
�t
n r
*:e�. t C
Y
r
T
5
'n`� 3 4 k!�!
w Y
f .F. E
1
S
Y
'x J p, ."r
k' n
;r
n.. i
,t�, f.^ .u� s.
f
i t
u
4 t
23
:f
ss. X h.
F
F
l f�.
,4
S
f
�c
a
r
F f.
T
t 5� 5
E_.:; a
L b w n
r.;, 1� u+
t
���c�+ <i� .�������'+��+�.���+T�+: .i�, ��i�ki+���`��� ��k����'��� �a�����':��'+F^
f
!I
E
y
�,'l 3 j2 .5
t� r
r
e
s
t
t
;t s
u`
.w` t s
c
J
b' Z
N
q ,=i,3
s.::
u
l
r '3
s
�4
=::i
J
J
h
u:
4 f
.�I
}N.
i
r 3Y
l
t
4L
i
f X
J
f
X
2� 4' Y'
v
f �j J W
h
s 5 Ys'3
r jl
b'Y:
,f':
K fi
t
Y
i:
i
i
l
..y
-v F
4
T
i
J
J' lL
ti;
p
R vr
I
y 4
t:::
{a
iT
r...: .i
fi J
•.p
':,s sa.
r
..'YV'... F
i�r.
e..
n x. ....':.n...
.......s.r. ....e..:
COUNCTL ITEM MEMORANDUM
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk
DATE: June 7, 2007
SUBJECT: Licenses for Council Approval
Recommendation:
I recornmend that the City Council approve the following list of licenses at its June 11, 2007,
meeting.
Background:
The following businesses/persons have applied for City Iicenses as noted. Each business/person
has fulfilled the requirements of the City Ordinance governing respective licenses, submitted
appropriate applications, and paid proper fees.
FIREWORKS-PERMANENT
Walgreens 6390 Brooklyn Blvd
GARBAGE HAULER
Ace Solid Waste, Inc Ramsey, MN
BFI Waste Systems Circle Pines, MN
Walz Brothers Sanitation Maple Grove, MN
LIOUOR
Boulevazd's Bar Grill 2545 Co Rd 10
[contingent upon submittal of Workers' Compensation Insurance Coverage, copy of Hennepin
County Food License, and payment of license fees, approval by State AGED, and Building
Official's issuance of Certificate of (Jccupancy]
MECHANICAL
Nasseff Mechanical Contractors 122 S. Wabasha, St. Paul
United Heating A/C 1295 Hackamore Road, Medina
VVencl Services, Inc. 8148 Pillsbury Ave S, Bloomington
RENTAL
Renewal
(There were no calls for service for the following)
6912 Unity Ave N(Single Family) Geri Lynn Williams
�I
Initial
5240 Drew Ave N(1 bldg, 10 units) Bradley Schumacher
3 disturbing the peace
(There were no calls for service for the following)
6807 Humboldt Ave N#302 (Single Family) Erik Ostigaard
5617 Logan Ave N(Single Family) Darwin Marcia Kulzer
SIGNHANGER
Universal Sign Company 1033 Thomas Ave, St. Paul
Budget Issues:
There are no budget issues to consider.
t
t
x
x
r y
P
f
R
t f k
iµ f f
y
C t
4' l J
b
Z 3 '"z
c s
F
f
��{i L
l S
J
r". F
l
f
f
S
X
.J -5 �E
.s. f
F:: 2
r F r
3
�+'ll
l
e J
d
2
z
✓l' v l
�y�
r
s
�r
v
;L "�Xr t
i.
f
Y fr
2
S:
7 F ,!l
J
f X�
d
4 �l
Y
6
l f -r F n y
iS���� �+��h���wl���y�� YM' j ��R����'T' 'Y3
J.
YM
v J
fr '�i 4
5
f
x
.t.
F 5..
I 4
e
f
r
f+
x'
yy K
f.. �r'a
E' y
x
i�
l
Y ;i
3
c
J'�� �Y
J
3
S e! G'
5
3
K:
j
f
Y
f f
F X
;o-:.. .j f
�T d
l
i..�:
x
X .r
e` 4
�f
t lJ
X
l Y
t
,�S
y
k
3
J k,
7
d
5
'f
i
x
s:'
s
f: �:t
J
F!
g I
a
4
t
i
v
F
I
k'
J
X �5:
'k'
4
t+
l .l
y
y
K
f
F
t. ..�Ft�:� .s ....v.. ..x.::K..
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING EARLE BROWN DAYS AS A CIVIC EVENT FROM
JUNE 21 THROUGH JUNE 23, 2007
WI�REAS, the purpose of Earle Brown Days is to promote the City of Brooklyn Center,
its people, and amenities; and
WHEREAS, residents, the city, community civic groups, and businesses participate in the
annual civic celebration to demonstrate the vitality of the City of Brooklyn Center; and
WHEREAS, in order for Earle Brown Days, Inc. to schedule certain events requiring
City-issued administrative land use permits, it is necessary for Earle Brown Days to be declared a
civic event.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn
Center that Earle Brown Days are declared a civic event from June 21, 2007 through June 23, 2007.
June 11. 2007
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
f
u
:i: e` h
Y
1
E
J k(4'",,+ F
f f
r
,rn
r
f
f
l l N 2
f �x
v
t +3
J 2
k
1 j
I
F
F
J: y37
r f.
,w
'�p y
l 'n
F
y
i� ;l
r
n:.
r r
a
y t
u 4 z
r
t ;y t
j
J�
l f I
J
1.
y i� .t;
.5 xf ?N
f
��i S y f
T f �5' S
'i 1 I
t:
e�
t
x r.
s
f t
t
s
t t
������Y(�����. M!�.� .wa�i�,.����M� *��������J► a�'�
r�"".
x
r
x x
F r g%�� s
s
9
l
?L
l.
s t l
r
�r
F
l
Y
a'- J
X
J
Z� S
PS
X�
l
"�L
5d
z s
x
f
o,
7
y
f
S
l
J
I
i X
i
'i
i, .:i
1
F l{�
X
e.
:.e.•:
r i
3P
f
h }6
E
.:e
F.Z"' 'Z
3' f
a::
2
T
7
v�.:: w-.
i
S�
x
r
a c,
`t
7"
l
f
1 s
�L
t
Y
P 35.: 1
v.
J
5
r
7
L
f
�F� L
h
I F
a
,i
x
a
r
,r
A
3
i
City of Brooklyn Center
A Millennium Community
C4UNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Jim Glasoe, Director of Community Activities,
Recreation and Services
DATE: June 7, 2007
SUBJECT: Resolution Expressing Appreciation for the Donation of James and Lori
Dean in Support of the Brooklyn Center Community Center
Recommendation: Staff recommends acceptance of this donation.
Background: James and Lori Dean, the cw�rent owners of Christy's Auto Service in
Brooklyn Center, have offered to donate to the City eleven (11) pieces of hydraulic
exercise equipment. This equipment is approximately three years old and in excellent
condition. The pieces of equipment include:
*�it Express Hip Abduction/Adduction *Fit Express Squat
*Fit Express Abdominal/Low Back *Fit Express Lift Task
*Fit Express Pectoral /Deltoid (Butterfly) '"Fit Express Chest Row
*Fit Express Shoulder Press/Pull Down *Fit Express Bicep/Tricep
*Fit Express Leg Extension/I,eg Curl *Precor Stretch Train
*Fitness Technology Rotary Torso
Prior to their purchasing Christy's, the Dean's were owners of a women's fitness facility
in the northern suburbs. While their business was initially successful, intense
competition in their immediate area forced the eventual closure of their facility.
Upon closure of the business, the Dean's examined their options related to the disposal of
the exercise equipment and supplies. While it made fiscal sense to sell some of the
supplies, their accountant determined that it would be more advantageous for them to
donate the equipment.
6301 Staingle Creek Parkway Recreataon and Communaty Center Phone TDD Number
Brookdyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400
City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434
FAX (?63) 569-3494
w ww. cityo fbrook lyncenter. org
Most of the ui ment is manufactured b Fit Ex ress. Fit Ex ress su hes i,u ment
�1 P Y P P PP ��1 �P
to a large portion of the fitness facilities that cater to women and seniors. As the
equipment uses hydraulic cylinders for resistance, it tends to be Iess intimidating for
many users.
Fit Express hydraulic fitness equipment operates just as if you were swimming.
Resistance is provided by the machines in both directions when the user pushes and pulls
the exercise arms. Faster movements produce more resistance; stop moving and
resistance stops. Varying cylinder adjustments are preset to provide multiple training
forma�s for better and faster results. Most fi�ess machines exercise opposing muscle
groups on each side of the joint.
Our intent is to mazket and use the new equipment in a"circuit training" environment.
Circuit training is a type of interval training in which strength exercises are combined
with endurance/aerobic exercises, thus giving you all the benefits of both a
cardiovascular and strength training workout.
The term circuit means that a number of carefully selected hydraulic weight and
cardiovasculaz stations would be ositi
p oned azound the facility in a circle. Participants
are assigned to each station, and they then rotate around the stations to the next with little
or no rest performing 15 to 60 second workouts until all exercises have been completed
or a certain time requirement achieved.
Circurt trauung is siutable for a11 levels of ability, age, or fitness level because
participants can work at their own 1eve1, performing each exercise at their own speed and
intensity. This tends to minimize the number af inembers who quit due to boredom, slow
results and limited time. Beginners and less fit people appreciate the simplicity and
ability to do this exercise without feeling left out.
Budget Issnes: Wiule there is no immediate budgetary impacts that would be created by
acceptance of this donation, it can be assumed that there would be a future expectation by
users that the equipment will be maintained and eventually replaced. As a result, our
equipment maintenance and replacement budgets will naed to be increased accordingly.
Currently, we allocate $5,000 per year for equipment replacement. With this donation,
we would anticipate the replacement budget would need to increase to appmximately
$7,000 for 2008. Additionally, I would anticipate tha.t the equipment maintenance
allocation would need to be increased by $500 for the same period.
It is our expectation that these increases would be more than offset by increased
membership and/or admission fees generated as a result of the new equipment. We will
track membership growth to determine that the added costs are offset by the increased
memberships.
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR THE DONATION OF
JAMES AND LORI DEAN IN SUPPORT OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER
COMMUNITY CENTER
WHEREAS, James and Laurie Dean have donated eleven (11) pieces of exercise
equipment to the Brooklyn Center Community Center, and
WHEREAS, the City Council is appreciative of this donation, and commends the
Dean's for their civic efforts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Ci�y of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota:
1. Acknowledges the donation with gratitude.
2. Commends James and Laurie Dean for their civic efforts.
June 11, 2007
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
f:T I
f 4
XJ 3
F
f
!A' 5
f J
l I .Y
A j
..a J L
x:
n.
X w�
k k f
..f
y t
4'
k
'.'�'h
J
4 d
t
r d
v
w t
y N. x;
3
S
J.:
n
i
Fu
-r 2 E s a.'�
Fy 3
a�
z
y��..
,::{,�u
x
k Z
^1 i"
A
1 g t "`�r
P
fr
3
s 1
Fk�
y f
5
1
5
L 3
,t x
.'r�
f� 4 l
X
F
r i �'l
`*f
l
e
i
I j
F
���f��''�������+�*?� r����� ����r,�hJ��"`'��N+��" +a�h��� �n`' �IT'
X.
J c'
�'1 .r'
w. b:
j
y N
i �9��" I
y y
y[
�:+������*r� r��u��.��.���1�(»�Y.�.��i� 1���`.,���:�� �����Ilr"w��..��w������F�";�.r����#4k'�' "����'�r'
r
X 1
J .�J�II��Y��� 5 �+M����������,'������ X�,
::'3 "NJ '����Z�
Y
fa` 3:
F` 3lJ
�x,
L. I
l
y 3 fiJ
t:
l:-
4
S
..:t' J 1
5;
fr
F' x
i
m•
�s. :i�.
q s
S f f
5 rx
�'r'
ri
F
e
F.:
r
s;
f
S
`.v
x ll
Y I F
rr F
f Z
e F
S
l
y
y
5 ,v
'..y
k
'*.i J
r 4 S
y
a
Y
l
t.
.........x;. �.,.,s.�v�
I�
t
t
f.t
i
i
r
t
a t
c
4
a
r
x a'��
v
F
a 3
y+
Y .5
9 �'1 l I
l
Y
f; y �S
f h
C
l Y
x
j
T
f
4 YN'� -�.e
y.
j f
S
3
b
J J
i- .s`� 3
1
3
F
5
i
4 F.
m
h f
K J f
z
r_.
Y
X
�.�3 S .7
v L
k
J
r
�+t :sx
�x
+�.�r ��`.�..���k��
L "l C J
X i
i
i j
t 4
..�o f3 F
j h
z
r
f a
x'
x
t
r
k
t
r
E
u x
5
1
x�§
r,:a
t x t
:t :s
r
x
:.c
x�
x 3
t
x `4
t.
x
f`
t
L
f 3
f
..i�
:n..
i
l
x
5 f
E
t
J k
f
4
c
y
S F
1
4
i:
x
3 1
r..
E
L
t
3
COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Ronald A. Warren, Planning and Zonin ecialist r��
DATE: June 6, 2007
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Application No. 2007
Recommendatlon:
It is recommended that the City Council, following consideration of this matter, approve the
application subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission at their May
31, 2007 m�ting.
Background:
On the June 14, 2007 City Council Agenda is Planning Commission ApplicationNo. 2007-009
submitted by Brooklyn Center ,Church of the Nazarene requesting a Special Use Permit and
Site and Building Plan Approval for a three phase church addition and parking lot expansion at
SO1 73� Avenue North. This matter was considered by the City Council on May 14, 2007,
was tabled and referred back to the Planning Commission to review and comment on a revised
landscape/screening plan submitted by Pastor Dean Potts. He has since further revised the
screening proposal to include a combination of opaque screening, coniferous trees and berming
which was reviewed and discussed at the May 31, 2007 Planning Commission meedng. The
Planning Commission recommended modifications to the Church's screening proposal. Their
recommendation is contained in a revised Condition No. 11 which can be found on Page 4 of
their May 31, 2007 minutes.
It should be noted that the property owners at 7242 and 7250 Camden Avenue North were
notified of the Planning Commission's consider ation of this matter as directed by the City
Council. No one appeazed at the meeting to make comment. Also, the 60 day time limit for
responding to zoning requests will expire on June 11, 2007 at 12:00 p.m. (the date of the
Council meeting). The Council should keep this deadline in mind regarding approvalldenial of
this application.
Attached for our review are co ies of the Plannin Commission Information Sheets for
Y P g
Planning Commission Appiication No. 2007-009 and also an azea map showing the location of
the property under consideration, various site and building plans for the proposed
development, the Planning Commission minutes relating to the Commission's consideration of
this matter and other supporting documents.
Budget Issues: There are no budget issues.
Application Filed on 4-12-07
City Council Action Should Be
Taken By 6/11/07 (60 Days)
Planning Commission Information Sheet
Application No. 2007-009
Applicant: Bmoklyn Center Church of the Nazarene
Location: 501 73rd Avenue North
Request: Special Use PermidSite and Building Plan Appmval
This application is for a Special Use Permit and Site and Building Plan approval for a three phase
building addition and parking lot expansion for the Church of the Nazarene located at 501 73'�
Avenue North. This application was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on
April 26, 2007 subject to eleven conditions of approval and forwarded to the City Council for
their consideration on May 14, 2007. Condition No. 11 of that recommendation stated "the plans
shall be modified to pmvide a 6 ft. high opaque fence along the west property line to screen all
R-1 zoned property except for the City's well house property."
The applicant, Pastor Dean Potts, submitted a written request to the City Council to be allowed to
provide a landscape screening along the west property line rather than the 6 ft. high opaque fence
and submitted computer enhanced photographs of what they screening would look like in support
of his proposal.
Attached for the Commission's review is a copy of his submission. The City Council considered
the applicant's request, aware that the Planning Commission had not had an opportunity to
review the materials submitted. The Council wants Planning Commission input on the request
and has tabled the matter and referred it back to the Planning Commission for input and
comment. The City Council also requested that the staff notify the property owners at 7242 and
7250 Camden Avenue North of the Planning Commission's consideration to seek their input
regazding screening if these parties are interested.
The applicant notes in his written comments five points as to why he believes the landscape
screening would be more appropriate than the 6 ft. high opaque fence.
The Planning Commission should review the material submitted and make any recommendation
with respect to the screening plan which is part of the site and building plan. Attached is a copy
of the information sheet presented to the Planning Commission on Apri126, 2007 as well as
other supporting information. A 15 ft. green strip/buffer is required where this property abuts R-
1 zoned property. The parking lot screening standard requires effective screening from abutting
residential lots by a solid opaque fence or wa116 ft. high or such other device as may be approved
by the City Council. Landscape screening has been approved in other cases based on a
deternunation that the 6 ft. high opaque standard is met.
The Planning Commission must make a determination that the information provided shows
5-31-07 Page 1
screening sufficient to recommend it as being adequate to meet the ordinance standazds. The
Commission should review and discuss this matter and make any appropriate recommendation.
As mentioned previously, we have sent informational notices to the property owners at 7242 and
7250 Camden Avenue North regarding the reconsideration of this matter. The Commission may
well wish to open the meeting to seek such input.
5-31-07 Page 2
n
ri
1
1
�♦1� S�
1��11������� �i �i
1�■ ��...���/t������s R. �.4 ,ra
■i■ ■�����s���■�
�G�� I s i ii
��S
�'I �t�
s�,�,����� I�i�
r�^ f.�
t�� ��[1
�i�i �I�
t1r�'
��1W ■�11� E s�
�E' r�
Z �`.F
'S �t_'! °��r
�F� t�� ■:Ii►�
�'r
►,7
■1�
■I�■ i iii
T e i
_11;•
�i 'r,
a r��► ��t
�ra
„1 ��a �r
1 iC1 t-u:l� a
�L�
i�
t�-� �c�
a�a� �r-� �r�a ��a
sta ii i
�,Fa �t�-�� ��a
'���0 �i:i �t��t �f:i
.leL'����E���1�u
�t
i i rl r
''I� I
�i
C� 1 �1► :rc
:�'�:�'�i
�t11 �1!
r*�; ..1 r
�r"`.
M 'f,�{y��`� f���
��t e
�i:'�.�`e�� i S
i�
t
�i
�t:,� �E� �w!
��n� �f'a �i,�
�f_� �t� tit
LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 1
s
#MyrwwwYfwAiaN/° Q41P�M1� tO0r01�911s
http:/lgis.logis.org/LOGIS ArcIMS/ims?ServiceName=bc LOGISMap OV&ClientVersio... 4/19/200?
To: City of Brooklyn Center City Planning Commission May 28, 2007
The Brooklyn Center Church of the Nazarene made an appeal fo the City
Commissioners about instalIing a six foot high fence on or near the west property line to
screen the view of the proposed garking lot from the neighbars. 'The preference was to
put more evergreen trees and shrubs in place to have a living screen vs. a board fence. A
letter was written explaining our rationale and piciiues were edited to show the effects of
both plaus.
After listening to bath the Plamning Commissioners and the City Commissioners
discuss the matter, it seems a compromise soiution would be in the best interest of all
parties. First to understand the require�ments:
1 Tt seems that the oal of the screeni.n is to block the li ts from vehicles
P��'Y S 8 8h
shiming onto the neighboring pr�perties, into bedroom windaws, etc.
2) Tt was mentioned by ane of the commissioners tfiax it is best to have the fence close to
where the vehicles actually are to best block the lights. An upper level room with a view
over the fence would receive some headlight glare. This was a concern of the church and
part of the reason we suggested using trees that would grow much taller than 6 ft.
3) It was noted that evergreen trces and shrubs would take some time to grow urto an
eff�ctive screen. This was a primary concern voiced by both councils.
4 In discussion, mention was made of earth beixns as a me�ns of bloc
P��
headlight glare.
As one alternative, the Brnoklyn Center Chnrc6 of the N�rene is su�esting an
eASt:weat fence be pat xlong tfie north line of the new parldng aection aezt to the
pond and a short fence along the west side of the parking area next to the Char�L
Parsonag�. A low berm, 3 to 4 ft high �vould be erected along the west side of t6e
driveway. Trees would be planted along the west property line ss previously
describ�d. (See �tttsched sketch)
1) The fence and berm pla:ced clase to the parking area and driveway would do a better
job of keeping headlights from shining into the upper bedrooms of the two houses located
on properties 7242 amd 7250 Camden Ave. than would a fence along the west property
line.
2} This plan would allow time for the trees to grow to greater height and coverage before
additional parking was put into place and the benm was removed.
3) The amount of feace required would be less and it would be further away fram the
73� Ave., improving the looks of the property.
We want to have the best, most effective solution but wi11 implement any decision the
council agrees to.
Best Regards,
�PN", Q��J
s
f i �er ;��tu.,nt. rv r-rtis�n
.n,.�Y Of f�fi��Kt.'Y'd �=NT'FF��-
y Y Y y y :,r
N
CA1P ���.a�2 r.
�.a
�Z t x t�'� ;SyY,
I�
,4 �r
w 38 DO F
93._ll„� �"�'7�
<a„
1
�J
4{),DO
z
N
t�E
OiTE �'f4RY BtJiLDI�JG
�;.,�Rc�� vr +�az,a�r�ry�
�:a t� z� �t
501
i'F'�':B5'.SC+ k
�I m
.t�.ida
I
�s
l P�
j
��va
g
ti
144 ft 'Y`
N .��A r r. 4
1 nf i
a R r���;"��
iyi �ti
10
.:x
it
o
:3:iS.43 �lEAS, 33�.`s4 P:_�IT j
S��
Application Fi�ed on 4J12i07
I� City Council Action Should Be
Taken By 6/11J07 (60 Days)
Planning Commission Information Sheet
Application No. 2007-009
Applicant: Brooklyn Center Church of the Nazazene
Location: 501 '73rd Avenue North
Request: Special Use PermidSite and Building Plan Appmval
The applicant, Pastor Dean Potts on behalf of the Brooklyn Center Church of the Nazazene, is
seeking a Special Use Permit and Site and Building Plan approval for a three phase building
addition and parking lot expansion for the Church of the Nazarene located at 501 73� Avenue
North.
The property in question is zoned R-1(One Family Residence) and is located at the southwest
quadrant of T.H. 252 and 73'� Avenue North. It is surrounded on the north by 73'� Avenue which
is the municipal baundary between Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Pazk with single family homes
on the opposite side of the street; on the east by T.H. 252; on the south by R-4 (Multiple
Residence) zoned property containing the Evergreen Park apartments; and on the west by R-1
zoned property containing single family homes and a city well house. Churches are listed as
special uses in the R-1 zoning district.
PROPOSAL
The applicant proposes to do the above mentioned additions and alterations in three phases.
(See the written narrative provided by Pastor Potts, attached.) Phase I includes a substantial
expansion to the east, west and soufh sides of the existing pazking lot. The parking lot would
still be to the back side of the church and would be expanded to within 5 ft. of the south property
line, 15 ft. of the west property line, and 15 ft. of the T.H. 252 right of way, which are all the
minimum required property line setbacks in these cases. They also plan to alter the current drop
off area on the east side of the church by removing the existing canopy and drop off azea while
making a relatively small addition (1,047 sq. ft.) to the southeast corner of the building to
accommodate an expanded sanctuary and a new foyer. Also to be added at this time would be a
new canopy over a revised drop off azea and an unfinished second floor addition. The Phase I
plan will provide a new dry pond area at the northwest corner of the site to accommodate and
control water run off from the expanded parking lot and proposed three phase building
expansions.
Phas� II would involve an L-shaped addition at the southeast corner of the church along with
parking lot alterations, sidewalk expansions and finishing of spaces in the second story addition.
Twenty five new parking spaces would be provided on the west side of the building along both
sides of the access drive from 73'� Avenue North. A reconfigured drive up/drop off area would
also be accomplished under this phase.
4-26-07
O Page 1
Phase III would include a courtyazd and foyer addition at the northeast and southwest carners of
the building respectively and e�ansion of the sanctualy.
ACCESS/PARKTNG
Access to the site is unchanged and is provided by a single curb break off 73'� Avenue North,
west of the existing location of the church building. The pazking requirement for a church is
based on its seating capacity. The final expansion of the church would have a seating capacity of
350 seats, requining a total of 117 parking spaces. Interim expansion has a maximum seating
capacity of 300 seats, requiring 100 pazking spaces. The Phase I parking expansion and
reconfiguration will accommodate 120 cars. One hundred thirty four spaces will be provided in
the final phase, which exceeds the minimum required for this facility.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/UTILITIES
The applicant has provided a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan which is being
reviewed by the City Engineer. His written comments will be attached for the Commission's
review.
A ponding area sized to accommodate the full expansion of the church will be constructed during
the Phase I expansion. Storm sewer will be provided to capture drainage to be conveyed to the
ponding area and then discharged into the public storm sewer system. B-612 curb and gutter is
required around all parking and driving areas.
The church serves as an informal Metro Transit Pazk and Ride facility during offpeak church
hours. The expanded pazking facility will accommodate additional Park and Ride users and the
site will be connected in the future to the bus shelter adjacent to T.H. 252 by the sidewalk.
Approval of this application should acknowledge the Pazk and Ride arrangeinent between the
church and Metro Transit based on an off peak use of the property.
LANDSCAPING/SCREENIlVG
The applicant has proposed two provide some landscaping on the site in conjunction with his
required site and building plan submittal. There are a few deciduous trees and shrubs on the site,
some of which will have to be removed for construction. The applicant has been provided with
the landscape point system used by the Planning Commission for evaluating landscape plans. It
should be noted that the landscape point system does not address church facilities or schools, so
we really have no evaluation criteria. We have suggested the service/office category as a
guideline for evaluating this landscape plan. Screening is also required where parking lots of six
or more vehicles abut residentially zoned property. A 15 ft. green strip is required where #his
pr�perty abuts R-1 and is provided. No buffer distance is required where the church property
abuts with the apartment complex to the south. The pazking lot screening standard requires
effective screening from abutting residential lots by a solid opaque fence ar wa116 ft. high or
such other device as may be approved by the City Council. The City Council has approved
Page 2
landscape screerung in the past that will meet the 6 ft. opaque standard.
The site in question is 2.28 acres which, if it were a service/office use would require 220
landscape points. Their plan indicates two new Hackberry trees, to be placed along the northwest
green strip: four new Norway Spruce west of the retention pond; nine new shrubs planted 6 ft.
apart, west of the new pazking lot; ten new shrubs planted 6 ft. apart in the two island delineation
azeas in the parking lot, and 23 shrubs along the south property line east of an existing 6 ft. high
wood fence. There appears to be three existing deciduous trees on the site that will be saved.
This appears to he a total point value of 85 points, given the landscape point system.
The Cornmission must determine two things: 1. Is this sufficient landscaping to meet the
requirement of a landscape plan? And 2. Is the screening sufficient to recommend the screening
plan to the City Council as being adequate to meet the standards of the ordinance? Screening is
required along the west side and south side of the newly expanded parking lot. It should be
pointed out that there is an existing 6 ft. high wooden fence that meanders along the pmperty line
between the Church of the Nazarene and the apartment complex to the south. The apartment
complex also had screening requirements where it abuts with the R-1 zoned church property. It
is believed that this fence is for screening purposes between the two uses, however, it does not
screen the entire width of the lot nor would it provide screening for the expanded parking area.
Again, the applicant proposes to fill this area in with shrubs planted 6 ft. apart to meet their
screening obligation. Along the west property line aze three existing single family homes and a
city well house which has the appearance of a single family home. Again, screening is required
along this area because of the abutting pazking lot. We have advised the applicant that we do not
believe it is mandatory to screen the parking lot from the city's wel2 house, however, the balance
of the residential property should be provided with screening that is considered appropriate for
this area.
BUII.,DING
The applicant has provided building elevations showing the east and north building elevations for
the church in its final stage. They plan to have five inch vinyl siding with an aluminum covered
trim board around the perimeter of the building and a shingled roof. Floor plans and building
sections have also been provided showing the expanded sanctuary area, foyer, classrooms,
offices, restrooms and kitchen areas for the revised facility.
LIGHTING/TRASH
The applicant has submitted a lighting plan showing foot candles at various locations
surrounding the site. The plan shows seven light standazds surtounding the new parking facility
on the south side of the church and one light standard at the entrance. The lighting plan shows
foot candles to be within the range of authorized lighting in residential areas.
Section 35-712 of the City Ordinances requires that all exterior lighting shall be provided with
lenses, reflectors or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the property of the owner or
Page 3
s operator of the illumination devices. Rays of light shall not pass beyand the pmperty lines of the
premises at an intensity greater than 3 ft. candles measured at praperty lines abutting residentialiy
zoned property. No glare shall emanate from or be visible beyond the boundaries of the
illuminated premises. The applicant provides a note on the plan indicating that fixtures are
"forwazd throw with sharp cut off lights at required locations such that lighting levels will be
zero at lot lines".
ed that an trash will be contained
The plan mdicates no outside trash faciliries. It is assum y
within the building. If this is not the case, the applicant should provide a location for trash and
an appmpriate screening device compatible with the building to screen the trash cvntainers from
public view.
SPECIAL USE PERNIIT STANDA.RDS
As indicated previously, the church is a special use in the R-1 zoning district and is subject to the
standards for special use permits contained in Section 35-220 of the City Ordinances (copy
attached). These standards for special use permits require that the proposed special use will
promote and enhance the general public welfare and not be detrimental to or endanger the health
and safety of the public; not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the
immediate neighborhood, nor substantially diminish or impair property values; not impede the
normal and orderly development of surrounding property; be designed so as to minimize traffic
congestion on the public streets; and conform with the applicable regulations of the district in
which it is located.
We would comment that the expansion of the Brooklyn Center Church of the Nazarene would
not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. Furthermore, it is
believed that this expansion will not be injurious to other property in the immediate vicinity nor
will it diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Adequate measures have
been taken to provide property ingress and egress and the parking on the site is ad�uate for the
uses provided and the use of the pazking lot facility at off peak times from the church use as a
Park and Ride facility is appropriate and should be encouraged. We also do not see traffic
congestion on public streets to be created with this expansion.
There are matters that need to be worked out with respect to the adequacy of the proposed
landscaping and screening plan. These do not seem to be insurmountable and once satisfied, it
can be determined that the proposal meets the standards for special use permits contained in the
City's Zoning Ordinance and can be recommended for approval.
A public hearing has been scheduled with respect to this special use permit and notices have been
sent to surrounding property owners.
RECOMI��NDATION
I S Page 4
Approval of this application is recommended subject to the following conditions and
considerations:
1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official
with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan are subject to review and
approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits.
3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to
be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical
equipment shall be appropriately screened from view.
5. B612 curb and gutter shall be provided around a1l parking and driving areas.
6. An as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines shall be
submitt� to the City Engineering Department.
7. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform
to the City of Brooklyn Center's current standazds specifications and details.
8. The applicant shall provide appropriate erosion and sediment control devices on
site during construction as approved by the City Engineering Department and
shall obtain an NPDES construction site erosion control permit from the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site.
9. A special use permit is grant�i to the Brooklyn Center Church of the Nazarene to
expand the church in the proposed three phase development and to provide for a
Metro Transit Park and Ride facility as comprehended. by these plans. Any
expansian or alteration of this site, not comprehended by the zoning ordinance or
by these approved plans shall not be authorized and would be subject to an
amendment to the special use permit.
10. The special use pemut is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances and
regulations. Any violations thereof could be grounds for revocation.
11. The plans shall be modified in such a manner to bring the landscaping and
screening plans into compliance with city requirements or the landscape plans and
screening plans are recommended to be in compliance with the provisions of the
zoning ordinance for these two matters.
Page 5
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF TI� PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF N�INNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
May 17, 2007
CALL TO ORDER
The Planning Commission meering was called to order by Chair Pro Tem Roche at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Chair Pro Tem Roche, Commissioners Graydon Boeck, Gary Ford, Michael Parks, and Delia
Young were present. Also present were Secretary to the Planning Commission/Planning and
Zoning Specialist Ronald Warren, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca
Crass. Chair Sean Rahn and Coxnmissioner Rachel Lund were absent and excused.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES Anri126. 2007
There was a motion by Comrnissioner Ford, seconded by Commissioner Young
to approve the minutes of the April 26, 2007 meeting as submitted. The motion passed.
Coxnmissioner Michael Parks abstain� as he was not present at the meeting.
CHAIR' S EXPLANATION
Chair Pro Tem Roche explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of
the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these
hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Cot�ncil makes
all final decisions in these matters.
APPLICATION NO. 2007-Q10 GREG A. NELSON
Chair Pm Tem Roche introduced Application No. 2007-010, a request for a Special Use Permit
amendment to expand the Minnesota Martial Arts Academy locat� at 6840 Shingle Creek
Parkway. The purpose of the proposed amendment is to expand the size of the operation by
doubling the amount of square footage utilized and to incorporate two other athletic training
operations into the site. These include Athletic Performance, Inc. operated by Mr. Scott M.
Rarnsdell and Coyote Chiropractic operated by Dr. Daniel Piper.
The property in question is zoned I-1 (Tndustrial Park). The Martial Arts Academy is regarded as
an"instructional use" which is an allowable use in the I-1 zone through the Special Use Permit
process.
Mr. Warren presented the staff report describing the location of the property and the proposal.
(See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 5-17-07 for Application No. 2007-010,
attached.) The City Council on March 28, 2005 appmved Planning Commission Application Na
2005-005 which authorized the Minnesota Martial Arts Academy Special Use Permit for an
instructional use at the same location. Condition No. 1 of the approval required any expansion or
3-10-OS
Page 1
major alteration to the use to be subject to an amendment to the Special Use Permit. This
application is in response to that condition.
PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATION NO. 2007-010
I There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Ford, to open the
public hearing on Application No. 2007-010, at 7:17 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Greg Nelson,1932 Teton Trail, Brooklyn Park, introduced himself to the Commission.
Commissioner Boeck inquired if this facility is regulated by any government agency. Mr.
Nelson responded that they aze not.
Chair Pro Tem Roche called for comments &om the public.
No other persons from the public appeared before the Commission during thepublic hearing on
Application Na 2007-010.
CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Commissioner Ford, to close the
public hearing on Application No. 2007-010, at 7:20 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
The Chair Pro Tem called for further discussion or uestions from the Commissioners. The
q
Commissioners interposed no objecrions to approval of the Application.
ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 2007-010 GREG A.
NELSON
There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Parks to recommend
to the City Council that it approve Application No. 2007-010, submitted. by Greg A. Nelson for a
Special Use Pernut amendment ta expand the Minnesota Martial Arts Academy located at 6840
hin Parkwa sub'ect to the followin conditions:
S gle Creek y g
L The amended Special Use Permit is issued to Greg A. Nelson on behalf of Minnesota
Martial Arts Academy, Inc. as an instrucNonal use in martial arts, a strength and
conditioning operation for training and athletic performance and chiropractic services
specializing in health, education, injury prevention, personal and public safety. No
other use, not comprehended by this application shall be permitted. Any further
expansion or major alteration to the use shall be subject to an ameudment to this
Special Use Permit.
2. The Special Use Permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances and regulations.
Any violation thereof may be grounds for revocation.
3. Tenant improvement plans are subject to review and approval by the Building
Official with respect to applicable codes through the building peimit process.
4. Special Use Permit approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to the
3-10-OS
Page 2
rovisions of Ch ter 34 of the ci ordinances and the cit s sign policy with respect
P aP tY Y
to 69�' Avenue North.
Voting in favor: Chair Pro Tem Roche, Commissioners, Boeck, Ford, Pazks, and Young.
The motion passed unanimously.
The Council will consider the application at its May 29, 2007 meeting. The applicant must be
present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require
that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration.
OTHER BUSINESS
Mr. Warren explained that Planning Commission Application No. 2007-009 would be
reconsidered by the Commission at their May 31, 2407 meeting since the City Council tabled the
item on May 14, 2007. The screening plan recommended for approval by the Planning
Commission had been changed and was not what was presented to the City Council. He stated
the Council has requested the review to give the opportunity to the Commission to review the
proposal in light of their recommendation.
There was no other business.
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to adjourn the
Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unarumously. The meeting adjourned at
7:26 p.m.
Chair
Recorded and transcribed by:
Rebecca Crass
3-10-OS
Page 3
I
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF TI� PLANNING COMMISS ON
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
STUDY SESSION
MAY 31, 2007
CALL TO ORDER
The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Rahn at 7:03 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Chair Sean Rahn, Commissioners Graydon Boeck, Rachel Lund, Michael Parks, and Della
Young were present. Also present were Secretary to the Planning Commission/Planning and
Zoning Specialist Ronald Warren, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca
Crass. Commissioner Roche was absent and excused. Commissioner Ford was absent and
unexcused.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES MAY 17. 2007
There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Parks,
to approve the minutes of the May 17, 2007 meeting as submitted. The motion passed. Chair
Rahn and Commissioner Lund abstained as they were not present at the meeting.
CHAIR'S EXPLANATION
Chair Rahn explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the
Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings,
the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council malces all final
decisions in these matters.
APPLICATION NO. 2007-009 BROOKLYN CENTER CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE
Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2007-009, a request for 5pecial Use Permit and Site and
�a
Building Plan approval for a three phase church addition and pazking lot expansion at 501 73
Avenue North.
Mr. Warren presented the staffreport describing the location of the property and the proposals.
(See Planning Commission Information Sheets dated 5-31-07and 4-26-07 for Application No.
2007-009, attached.)
This application was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on Apri126, 2007
subject to eleven conditions of approval and forwarded to the City Council for their
consideration on May 14, 2007. Condition No. 11 of that recommendation stated "the plans shall
be modified to provide a 6 ft. lugh opaque fence along the west property line to screen all R-1
zoned property except for the City's well house property". Following the Planning
Commission's review and recommended approval, the applicant submitted a written request to
the City Council to be allowed to provide landscape screening along the west property line rather
than the 6 ft. high opaque fence. The City Council considered the applicant's request, aware that
5-31-07 Page 1
the Planning Conunission had not had an opportunity to review the materials submitted, and
tabled this item. The City Council requested the Planning Commission review and comment on
the applicant's revised landscape screening plan along the west property line and has tabled the
matter.
Mr. Warren described an earlier conversation he had with the applicant in wluch Rev. Potts
described his now proposed landscaping plan, which would provide three types of screening:
1. A 3 ft high berm between the drive way and proposed ponding area; 2. A 6 ft high fence to
sereen the property from residents would be provided along the north and northwest portions of
pazking lot; and 3. Pmvide Evergreen trees between the pond and the west property line. The
applicant anticipates that within a reasonable time the trees would be mature enough as Phase II
and Phase III of the plan takes place. He reviewed the plan and written comments submitted by
Rev. Potts on May 28, 2007 and provided to the Planning Commission this evening.
The Planning Commission discussed various aspects of the existing and proposed landscaping.
Commissioner Boeck asked the applicant about the use of the parking lot as a pazk and ride lot.
Mr. Gene Hawkinson, church member, stated that Metro Transit will be using the parking lot for
a minimum of five years is a park and ride facil�ty. It is a multi cultural church and the building
is used at various times of the week. The majority of the time tra.ffic through the parking lot will
be during daylight hours. He further stated that the church does not want to be offensive to the
neighborhood and has asked for approval of the plan submitted to make it more appealing to the
neighboring properties.
Commissioner Boeck further asked if the applicant laiew how many cars use the pazking lot.
Mr. Hawkinson stated that they anticipate the parking lot will be used for 100-120 cars for the
pazk and ride which is during the church's offpeak hours. He added that there will be an
agreement between the church and the Metro Transit as to how long this arrangement will take
place.
Mr. Warren clarified that the church meets their pazking requirements and the use of the parking
lot by Metro Transit for a park and ride does not change the number of parking spaces required
for the church's use.
Commissioner Parks asked if there would be any changes to the pmposed berm during Phase III.
Mr. Warren responded that it is anticipated that the berm would be removed during Phase III,
since that area would be used for parking at that time.
Commissioner Pazks asked Mr. Hawkinson if they had considered placing the berm on the other
side of the pond and planting the trees on top of the berm. Mr. Hawldnson stated that they felt
the berm was more effective for screening where it is proposed on the plan. Mr. Warren further
explained that when Iooking at the plan, there did not appear to be enough room to alter the plan
in such a way.
i
5-31-07 Page 2
There was further discussion among the Commission regarding possible landscape options
requiring fences and trees.
ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 2007-009, BROOKLYN
CENTER CHIJRCH OF TI-� NAZARENE
There was a motion by Commissioner Lund, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to recommend
to the City Council that it approve Appl�cation No. 2007-009, submitted by Brooklyn Center
Church of the Nazarene, for Special Use Permit and Site and Building Plan approval for a three
phase building addition and parlcing lot expansion for the Church of the Nazarene located at SO1
73'� Avenue North subject to the following conditions:
1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official
with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan are subject to review and
approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits.
3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to
be deternuned based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical
equipment sha11 be appropriately screened from view.
5. B612 curb and gutter shall be provided around a11 parking and driving areas.
6. An as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines shall be
submitted to the City Engineering Department.
7. AlI work performed and materials used far construction of utilities shall conform
to the City of Brooklyn Center's current standards specifications and details.
8. The applicant sha11 provide appropriate erosion and sediment control devices on
site during construction as approved by the City Engineering Department and
shall obtain an NPDES construction site erosion control permit from the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site.
9. A special use permit is granted to the Brooklyn Center Church of the Nazarene to
expand the church in the proposed three phase development and to provide for a
Metro Transit Park and Ride facility as comprehended by these plans. Any
expansion or alteration of this site, not comprehended by the zoning ordinance or
by these approved plans shall not be authorized and would be subject to an
amendment to the special use permit.
10. The special use permit is subject to a11 applicable codes, ordinances and
regulations. Any violations thereof could be grounds for revocation.
5-31-07 Page 3
11. The screening/landscape plan dated May 28, 2047 is considered to be sufficient
screening consistent with Section 35-711 of the City Ordinauces provided the
plan is modified to eliminate the portion of the screen fence along the west side of
the parking lot and the addition of four more evergreen trees along the west side
of the chwch property to the south of, and in line with, the evergreen trees shown
on that plan.
Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners, Lund, Pazks, and Young. The motion
passed. Commissioner Boeck abstained.
The Council will consider the application at its June 11, 2007 meeting. 1'he applicant must be
present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require
that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration.
OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business.
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Corrunissioner Young, seconded by Commissioner Lund, to adjourn the
Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The rneeting adjourned at
8:25 p.m.
Chair
Recorded and transcribed by:
Rebecca Crass
5-31-07 Page 4
x
t
r
A
I 4
f"p
E
f F
Y
i'
f 4 l
r
R
F
l
p "N y :�,?j
y
f
F
f
C t
Y:
f
i ,5: ��T'
S
y F f�: I
1
7
2
j �f
3
C
I
l
y
3. t J
5 k
I
I I 4a
�i�
l
n f{
F
s y
r f
s
t a ti:
3T
.t'
���'�*'S` �,�M y ��Y����r�� '+1! +��w
I
�J��K�. f��
Z l 3 5
F
C
Y`?
7
z
t
i
r
3
b 4�
4
3
Z
..3.: 1 5!
r S l
l t
h
y
i F
f
h5
z.:
F
f F�
j l
i
t it
5
T
3
i
z i
f
E
a�+ 5z3
f
..,t +'3
3
''i.
h
>l.;
a l
...�:,.z
z
4
I
3
j
k
�:i
fl-
.X.�
::y ;Y,•
f
f
e�,�:
.t�
3
4
I
1
:.i....
e
I
1 3
I I I
l
l l
t
:.:.'i .4:'.. '�:o s n. t.. .v..
l
3
f
I
COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk �,,�1(,jf�,�,
DATE: May 30, 2007
SUBJECT: An Ordinance Amending Chapter 3, Section 3.11, and Chapter 4, Section 4.04, of
the Brooklyn Center City Charter
Recommendation:
I recommend that the City Council approve first reading of An Ordinance Amending Cha.pter 3,
Section 3.11, and Chapter 4, Section 4.04, of the Brooklyn Center City Charter and set second
reading and Public Hearing for July 9, 2007.
Background:
At its May 14, 2007, meeting, the City Council reviewed and considered the Charter
Commission recommenda.tion on two amendments to the Brooklyn Center Charter. The City
Council directed staff to draft an ordinance that would amend Sections 3.11 and 4.40 of the
Brooklyn Center City Charter, as recommended by the Charter Commission.
With regard to candidates filing by petition, there is the potential for all or none of the candidates
to file by petition. Since 1996, the number of candidates filing is as follows:
1996 5
1998 6
2000 3
2002 9
2004 5
2006 8
It is estimated that 45 minutes would be the amount of sta�ff time spent verifying 50 registered
voters.
Budget Issues:
The revenue generated from the increased filing fee is expected to be insignificant. With the
addition of the option of filing by petition, there will be greater staff time involved in the process
of verifying that the petition submitted by the candidate includes 50 registered voters. It is
impossible to know how many candidates will file by petition. There is no reason to believe that
this added task will be excessively burdensome.
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 9th day of July 2007 at 7 p.m. ar
as soon thereafter as the ma.tter may be heard at City Ha11, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to
consider An Ordinance Amending Chapters 3 and 4 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter;
Sections 3.11 and 4.04.
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in
advance. Please contact the City Clerk at 763-569-3300 to make arrangements.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER5 3 AND 4 OF THE BR04KLYN
�ENTER CITY CHARTER; SECTIONS 3.11 AND 4.04
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section L Section 3.11 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter is hereby
amended as follows:
Section 3.11. CODIFICATION AND PUBLICATION QF ORDINANCES. The City shall
codify and publish an ordinance code in book, pamphlet or continuous reference loose leaf form.
Copies shall be made available by the Council at the office of the City Clerk for general
distribution to the public in accordance with Councii nolicv. The
Citv Code shall be published and maintained on the Citv's website.
Section 2. Section 4.04 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter is hereby
amended as follows:
Section 4.04. FILE BY AFFIDAVIT
r Unon receivine a comuleted Affidavit of Candidacv
form and the navment of a filin� fee of twentv-five dollars ($251 bv a notential candidate or
filing bv the petition of fiftv 1501 re�istered voters on behalf of the candidate, the Clerk sha1l
certifv the elieibilitv of the candidate and place the name of the candidate upon the �3�
election ballot without partisan designation.
Section 3. This ordinance sha11 be effective after adoption and ninety (90)
days following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of 2007.
Mayor
AT"TEST:
City Clerk
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
indicates matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.)
rt,
F
F
v l
1
's
i
F
3
x' Z J e'4 �J
�J L
ii' f
t
Y
f y'. J t 'd
F
i
�r
j f
t
t
'r
y
t x-
s.
i
3 �y F ;�f
9 T
c d.:
.+i t
t
6I l
z
a
s, i
xa a
t
v 4
F�
�::i
z
l
i:
F'
b
y �.11 J
1
�Z,.
C
b
f
f
r�
t�._
b y' E y
i`
fi f
JJ
r�
i l +�e .y,
;2 1 ���������'*A������k+r. N��+�� �r�����M���IIM�� €�a��.:.�'�' x i�l I� #F
M �����:i:. i�
i t F",
t Fl
n.
h
t
M
a
...I� fi y.� b
i
fi 2
l
I
4
Y- t l
x
r Y
FY
Y.i r C
�F
i c.
_y
4 ��l f
2
L Y'
l: *t
h
r
lf
5. r
d
t�. r .f
F r
z
f
r:
}"iI
E f Z
s
E:
x
s
x&
1
j L� _t
t�.
s
F
�x
T
f
x
z.
f t
s 5
r i.
t
s a s s
t
y
a
s
�d
v_�
r
5' !3
4
I 1. f C
1 3l<�,-
yy 7 y sr i°
F
..r
j
g f
t
c
f
i
.a>...
y
X
COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Daniel Jordet, Director of Fscal Support Services
DATE: 6 June 2007
FR
nual Fnancial Re rt CA
SUBJECT. 2006 Comprehensive An po
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution
accepting the 2006 Comprehensive Annual Fnancial Report.
Background: Last Monday evening the City Council and Financial Commission met in a
joint working session to hear from Andy Hering about the results of their audit of our
financial statements for the period ended 31 December 2006. This assembly of financial
statements and data is known as the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report or 2006
CAFR. During the session Mr. Hering reviewed the purpose of the audit process and the
results of his firm's work on ifie 2006 CAFR review.
First, and most importantly, the City received an unqualified opinion on the presentabon
ofthe 2006 financial information, afso known as a clean opinion.
This indicates that the accounting and reporting systems for the City of Brooklyn Center
conform in all material aspects to the regulations and practices of the Government
Finance Officers Association, the Gbvemment Accounting Standards Board, and
generally accepted accounting pNnciples.
Supplemental opinions on Legal Compliance with State of Minnesota regulations and
Intemal Control and Operational issues revealed some adjustments that should be made
to our financial data collection and reporting system. Criteria will be developed to
facilitate approval of journal entries and adjustrnents to utility customer accounts.
Discussions are underway to develop a more accurate and verifiable method of
determining water consumption. Liquor inventory adjustments will be monitored and
reasons for the discrepancies found. Time off used by Department Heads will be
verified as approved by the City Manager.
In all, the 2006 CAFR preparation and audit went quite well for Brooklyn Center. The
report has reached the public a month earlier than in the past. The information in the
report reveals a City in good financial condition who should continue to monitor itself
carefully to insure its continued fiscal responsibility. The attached resolution ratifies the
work done by City staff and accepts the 2006 CAFR and Audit report.
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL
FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FOR
THE CALENDAR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is required by Sta.te Statute and
City Charter to annually produce financial statements for submission to the Office of the
State Auditor by June 30; and
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is required to provide an
auditor's opinion as to the representations in the annua.l financial statements; and
WHEREAS, the financial statements have been audited by HLB Tautges
Redpath, Ltd. as required; and
WHEREAS, HLB Tautges Redpath, Ltd. opined that the general purpose
financial staternents present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
City of Brooklyn Center as of December 31, 2006.
NOW, TI-IEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Brooklyn Center that the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the City of
Brooklyn Center for the calendar yeaz ended December 31, 2006, and all supporting
documentation, is hereby adopted as the official financial record for the 2006 fiscal year.
June 11. 2007
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
t
F
III l
l
2
R
F v 4 F 3
M
T.�,4
h
t,
4
i
i
Y
1
L
�g �j S
t
I
�:t J
3 A
2 J
y:
y
r
n „^x3
1
b
Pe
�'i J
t 5 7
j
h
f,
K -ri
r 4
`n::.i
i k f 1
t
�L z
n f
s�
i
E
ry'
t
a^
r
7 vi�.
Y
f
I I
pJ ���������fe�. �M;����+e�4 �+���A�1��l�''��w� +��G������ �F+�'��T +�..w.
3 k
f
f
X
..r,- 3
S
rv-`": 5
y.
3
4
k<
a.
:.y�
�r
1 l
q!.: y
5 P
1
yri
U
f 3
l! 3
p�,�
N
F� f
i.
l
l
i�
�.i
.:i�
Y+t
3
ry::.
j �C h
Y�`. l
M
fi �s
t s�
Y ?x
L
Y�
l
t
b i
:b
h ��,s.,
h r; t
3 i�
te J 5
l� .i
.:.:i
�2.
i.
^z
r r:
�.12
.i. :t t
i.
�.1.
X
�j
f
.::t
5
F
Y
..r.
4
t f
l
k
v
I f
�Y
I
F
:?:z.. r..
e f
P l..
I
i`
I COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FR4M: Todd Blomstrom, Director of Public Works
DATE: June 4, 2007
SUBJECT: Resolution Approving Final Plat for LINCOLN CROSSING
Recommendation:
Public Works staff recommends that the Brooklyn Center City Council approve the attached
resolurion approving the Final Plat for LINCOLN CROSSING.
Background:
On April 23, 2007, the City Council approved Planning Commission Application No. 2007-005,
Preliminary Plat for LINCOLN CROSSING. The proposed plat would combine and re-divide three
private lots, surplus right-of-way and a City owned parcel into three new lots and a common area for
a commercial developme�t located north of the Holiday Station Store at the northwest corner of State
Highway 252 and 66�' Avenue North.
Manley Commercial, Inc. (the applicant) is now seeking final plat approval from the City Council.
As a condition of final plat approval, staff is recommending that the applicant execute the following
documents prior to release of the Final Plat: 1.) an agreement for maintenance and inspection of
utility and starm draina.�e systems; and 2.) a shared access easement for the proposed shared
driveway access onto 66 Avenue North; and 3.) a subdivision agreement. A representative of the
applicant has indicated that these documents are being developed and will be provided prior to
release of the Final Plat.
Budget Issues:
The applicant has paid the required final plat application fee of $125. The attached resolution
requires the applicant to enter into a subdivision agreement as a condition of plat approval. The
subdivision agreement will include provisions for reimbursing the City for legal expenses associated
with the proposed development project.
Eincoln Crossing Final Plat
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR LINCOLN CROSSING
WHEREAS, the City Council, on April 23, 2007 approved a Preliminary Plat to divide
it, cn
tween 66 Avenue and 67
property located adj acent to the west side of State Highway 252 be
Avenue North as part of Planning Commission Application 2007-045; and
WHEREAS, Manley Commercial, Inc. has applied for final approval of the Final Plat for
LINCOLN CROSSING as required by City Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that the Final Plat for LINCOLN CROSSING is hereby approved,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Manley Commercial, Inc. shall enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the
City of Brooklyn Center for the proposed site improvements located within the
boundary of the LINCOLN CROSSING plat.
2. Conditions as reviousl recommended b the Plannin Commission and
P Y Y g
approved by the City Council for Planning Commission Application No.
2007-QOS.
3. Any additional requirements for providing a cross-access agreement, a utility
maintenance and inspection agreement and evidence of title satisfactory to the
City Attorney and City Engineer.
4. Any other conditions as established in the plat review letter dated May 10,
200'1 from the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Mn/DOT Review
File #P07-038.
5. Any other conditions as established by Hennepin County for recording of said
Final Plat.
RESOLUTION NO.
June 11, 2007
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken therean, the following voted in favor thereof•
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declazed duly passed and adopted.
w.._
r� �w�. •e■ N.i.e•..w•w:iwi�:n:a::a �e :::ii: iwi:�.�rr••::i�a:ii
LTNC4LN CROSSING
i�. i:� .0
ii �����b� Y ��i������s��ru��
.��YISW��1�\�I�������M/���Y��.M�.l�f3i��.
w000 ror�xaru....n�auru�u..•.�.�... r.�..i��
y qlryiD�i��Mx�����i�ii�l\�I IifOlY���p011101,1�r��!)�]O:t��M��H���w��•
t Ms�Y,11��NMr�� L�• w G����f. YY����w, ���N�� u ��w�r�Y
•�I�1 I��N ����I��� a1 iii tul� �1 YI�����1�. O YBDR81/� MM f/ 1{ M71 M011 YOMrllff
�T M9 YMID 91 {6fAf IR t7776.
t�o� �.�ar... �....r M.. x••••r�. c...v. r�.....o. r w....wnr aBqRS t!2 wu� MM rq11YM IOUI¢
to. �.��..xw �.w..
�...«�ry.��.�..� .�•.r c.. •-:�....�..e u rr o ��..w.M��•�
1-a� M.��� r r M� N�Ig SYy�11 lplW tl AS711iL q !0 !0
.�����rl• Y�Y�������x •�p:li����..����b.b.w�•
•NI�� C� �b l�c� ��i 1� M1� ��M M�����1� C
•�I��� �tl�l�� N ��s����. �b�11�� \������f �I ��N y41 N� �A N�1 b
o...ru� �.�w.�.� ena� a w�. �uun.�.•.w r.�.� �.�n� .s u..�.w.m w..uw SCILE
T.r�e111L1: M��s� �n ��1��N �111� /f �I��p� 1� N� ��.)f 4�1 r
11M���Iw�� �������I C����r\��f O�r� uti4�M�.
r.�.o �..�....a.�.,......<..a.t..�... .::c';a? .•;.....�!I i•iii. kii 1 e �.�t!!ii?Ti?i?':. .........'•i?:iiEii•i id(i!'s?u
fa ��nr �����s�� u r� r�� ��l����� u�irNwrr�ns� u �Y}S^7
�i;M�� No� n�vb rutrk�Y�� u� ini r��iN��.N� u• ���1�� ��u��� u in�� S3 7 M:.'UI I Iil:� J 'n t/p L_
y !�f n�• M�� ��r�M ����IM�i e e�I�� r��e�l lx� �t
tli� It�2•tt�1 ��f.
M ��n�f�� /N N� .InCOIM C� ���Ma�. Yn�� M•
2::K:�':..��.�......w.�� 6 7 T H A Y E
a������N MMY��r����� �������I�I��bl.
•��'��1 Y��f�f C�����sul.���. N��� �..���w �M��� I�� ��M
�.���i��11w��1�M����t� �a
{�O�[0'. Y��YIG������f�41��.
1F.@ t�ll s
M.
4 pj�/y.17��1;!
�Ttor
e5 ■r� o. 1� er�A"�� p
l��br���tr�U�p����l���������M���� �s����n ��.��I�� I
ii 1t�f'�����.�.n.�v.s�r •w. •Iw��u/v����np�� V I (:.L. i�ll.. F:J
1 �R.�Si.. S�L'
aiwwn�i�:1n.........r A-lr�.u�r.
1���� 1�� uw� �����^I ����rY�� �w �F �wt 11Y00LN 1 1 I
w�
1
,.o�r�.: LJ..���L__�__�— 1�
1 {�w���r r� M �IA� .N YY����p� M��1 uN �I�I1� a (/j
.:r.: •n�ie.�.o:°: �rw�rr•�u� ±5 wwK e
b�1�N�CY�1��� M •o 0 1��bo�b •puJ •��o�• I
�Y1� 4�����r���M�'.YM�M��i������w�.1.1.+:M.1�\��• 1
�.o.u�r �..ti..«� u �Mk o� B�U��t� �u r.�. �w w i I�i �i'i.
�.�N� �Y�••r• u �.•4..w� r. rb�. s�lieM'4iif Z
N w� �I[ IW
Yv�u..�r��.�����������.Y11LY����Y�.tif�1 S j 'w', b
Y 15 F. .y
l�i[ 01 IYM��OiA t N
euMrv ai ���rarw G� I i W 1�1
Y����Y� ��n�1�'�= �rY�[�N �����.w�.�� ��1��� O U
M��A D. �p lM����� L��� ����r I
z
.....w B
»:a L ,�.m
.o
•OOrtIIMCCNfEI1.Y�Y�{�O�♦
tt M!i\II'M�f MZ t
nu L�MCOlMC�0��M0 .�r�•••� ��•e••:iirhn..e�ne....�.�r.awr.� �71� 3
lr���If�C��1�r.MN������.��• �r���• •�s�l �R�"��
t��,��f:iiw•�r.x...r....�..u� �ns.....uw...i �a F"
....,w........ e....,.........� 1
���:.::3:.�;»:.,.......�......�.....�...�.... x
...r...r rr....« n.wa.....e....i.ia...... a. x�'o�'w'E j g
SitYCOYMCpOi�11001tNI1CFMTi�.���M��OI• �m 3 51 9; w
s a
�t M
f�l���(����YIOf�OlI�11TYfMT.N(IIY��IMCDYNtY.Y1MMf�OT• t•
N����f ��rM� A�IYa�s /����1� 4 ��M 1 ��M 1�� Ywi ���a�4��
��I�I��M�.Y�I��dM���Y��t ��]0�� M�E
14tl.�tv\�laY.�IYMiI�YCOYNT�11YO1T011 y 4 L; f 4 2 ��p
P a a�i. NlS�
i� j
aurve•onnw�.ee.�e�ueou.ir.rmxa�or• O
�������txY1MM.11�i.l��C_i�1�.��{11���/.M1��Y������������������M���>�1 RG
i>�a� J1.'.
MI�II�Y �.�IIOWII.wI�Y[�IM COYN�f �ullv��0• YIl�4�
LOYMlTIIlCY110lII.MfNME�IN00YYTY,Y�MY!{O�• r
u 5lY�N'M W'00 °1M r�
_�1.:•�•w�wuo..wura�.�u� �o��eeo� .m..�.. a�a .0-'1
.e I
,�.�c o..r u���rr.xe��cr�xcouwrre�eo�eee 1 MCCOMBSFRANKA008ASSC1(:IA1'L+S,IlVC.
L .y`�� �,�,�,wowrosuavarou
Nvw 3U5 �,a� .�.N
•�N► �vpa�ra� ��NVw o =«r s
�..�.�..r..�..a.
.a..
�_m., na p
�+---t--�
.�a�a
i
!+lfi«
w� w Rr +w� wY h +..'i
s o rno�Nn
��i s a� a �,.9 F,..,
R
5! YY5f5F• S In i7R
.�i��a n e
a ��i Z
N U*MM a �a• R� ��R
���s� pR ��p R R
r ,it
M M W g i
g��
e
C I I I
�p N A .��e ��4� i
r,, J I
t
�E
i I
,�r R1VER R �AY PI�T .N� 2?
y
�pY NO- 252 RtGHT
(SYATE HIGH �ANSP�jA�
MtNNE50TA 0 A_ R
I
i
,����"�°=h.
j i
f
a l i, q
f i -''F f i-°- i ,ry i
I i i ,er.sr�.
e r
.,d,�
i �i a
o i ,;,..�;:.�:y:=
z r w d
I p i J ,A 1
F M
I
s--' �r-_ i
y v ��o��
f I i -1
��x��i
,u...
i i i, �r
I .r 7 E��
5 i f3,
i euM:"a 1
,a"
j „ri ^a'" 1
f Clv,1 Y -f'"'
1 w 1 Ei
r •�t��i pa
i
I i �-..--.-1��Y`".6 r ���sr�'�
Y a r
l �-------f�--E{�-�
n a `�p �t i
�1����:_.
S
Fg
S
l'
F
t
J
t y
d
Y l
l
X�
n�jr
f:.
k
l F 2
.y ,.�e J
1 j 2:, 4" 3'
}T
f
1�
f
F y, .y
a
F
✓,Y'
l f
k
y 4��
3
i 5 J
5.
J
j
d
x 4
'S t,..:
J
5 Z i
y l
-h X
d f r":
f i. ,3�:.
r k j '"F 1'�
f
f^
u
r
a a:
n,.�
J
J
y
s
f.
S
t
L E
U I C
t
u'::
h:
J
i a
l
:i
Y
W
�}Y
r 4: e"
S p
Y
5
g
n.
M
J
b
i 4
F.
f��S
r":.� 5'.
S 5 i t
:i S
1
ri 4
ti
A
i F
"r
`�b$
Y
v:
Y
C
1
k
l 3 s
t
b
u::
1
3
3 '�l
.w
J
S
a,
Xt I
U
S
l �4
.ns
4
X
r 5 3
:r
:2
t
r.
�f
3
L
..w
I
I COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Todd Blomstrom, Director of Public Works
DATE: June 5, 2007
SUBJECT: Resolution Declaring a Public Nuisance and Ordering the Removal of Diseased
Trees
Recommendation:
Public Works staff recommends that the Brooklyn Center City Council declare a public nuisance and
order the removal of diseased trees as listed on the resolution document.
Background:
The attached resolution represents the official Council action required to expedite removal of the
diseased elm trees most recently marked by the city tree inspector, in accordance with approved
procedures. The City of Brooklyn Center has historically maintained a policy of removing diseased
trees promptly (in three weeks or less) and enforcement of proper disposal in order to keep this
disease from escalating in our community.
Approximately 150 trees were marked for removal under last yeaz's program, 57 of which were
removed by the City's tree contractor. The City's tree inspector anticipates that there will be
minimal increases in the number of diseased tree.s that will be marked for removal in 2007.
It is anticipated that a similar resolution will be submitted for council consideration each meeting
during the summer and early fall as additional diseased trees are identified and mazked.
Budget Issues:
The City's share of the cost of removal for diseased trees within the public right-of-way and City
property is included in the 2007 Budget under the Public Works Foreshy operating budget.
Disease Tree Remaval Resolution
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE
REMOVAL OF DISEASED TREES
WI�REAS, a Notice to Abate Nuisance and Diseased Tree Removal Agreement has
been issued to the owners of certain properties in the City of Brooklyn Center giving the owners
twenty (20) days to remove diseased trees on the owners' property; and
WHEREAS, the City can expedite the removal of these diseased trees by declaring
them a public nuisance.
NOW, TI�REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The diseased trees at the following addresses are hereby declared to be a public
nuisance:
PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS TREE
HERBERT KATHLEEN SMITH 5835 ALDRICH AVE N 5
HECTOR HERNANDEZ 6013 COLFAX AVE N 7
FETHI MOHAMMED/HIKMET ABDURASHID 5813 HALIFAX AVE N 8
METRO HOME SERVICES, INC. 4927 ZElVITH AVE N 9
DENNIS COUNCE 6032 HUMBOLDT AVE N 10
STEVEN SWANSON 5412 EOLFAX AVE N 1 I/12
RENALYN REECE 5323 LOGAN AVE N 13
JOSE PATINO 6236 REGENT AVE N 15
DOROTHY YARBROUGH 6007 VINCENT AVE N i6
JAMES GUSTAFSON 3519 WOODBINE LA 17
GERALDINE ROUZER 3707 69� AVE N 18
RICHARD MARYANN WII,DER 6718 DREW AVE N 19
MOUND CEMETERY (MICHAEL HOWE) 3515 69� AVE N 20
BRUCE CAREN PELKEY 3318 60� AVE N 22
RICHARD CSARGO 4912 ZENI'TH AVE N 23A
KIlVIBERLY PHII,IP SCAIA 4906 ZENI'TH AVE N 23B
RENE PLIEGO RODRIGUEZ 5716 JAMES AVE N 24
2. After twenty (20) days from the date of the notice, the property owner(s} will
receive a second written notice providing five (5) business da.ys in which to
contest the determination of the City Council by requesting, in writing, a hearing.
Said request shall be filed with the City Clerk.
3. After five (5) days, if the property owner fails to request a hearing, the tree(s)
shall be removed by the City. All removal costs, including legal, financing, and
administrative charges, shall be specially assessed against the property.
II,
RESOLUTION NO.
June 11, 2007
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WORK SESSION
June 11, 2007
Immediately Following Regular City Council and EDA Meetings Which Start at 7:00 P.M.
City Council Chambers
A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is
located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary.
ACTIVE DISCU5SION ITEMS
1. Used Automobile License Ordinance
2. 94/694 HWY 100 Redevelopment Area
3. Council� Travel Policy
Pending List for Future Work Sessions
Date Undetertnined
1. City Manager Performance Review Format and Procedure City Manager
2. Farmers Market City Council
3. 2011 Brooklyn Center Celebration City Council
4. Brooklyn Center Independent School District Joint Meeting Agenda
5. Brooklyn Center Alternative School Rezoning Issues
f f
S l t
C ta� S� zv
$i
X. Y.' q Z2o.- :Y 1
f G 4
F
4 ``'r F k
t
v`
t
s t S x
u
'.��rr
s�.
f
t
a `K' �r�# A h t
a
t�
�x
i v v:�
a i: :s�^<
I .;r x t f
t r ..�:z rz 7
Y' S S i. 'S
`=�..v t
1 4
�'v �.r`�^.'� 'r r�;`�'`p
3 "c.. x.,h j
.:7� .A':
3
5
L
Y
S;` r=� r'i.� f �r'�
l
l
s s
'?.3. 'b� N' 9 Ny. 4 ��'u, "PC I Y-
F..y'^�t' H
'2 3 M 2
`'X r;" +5�'
t �r z�• f yy 's�r
A..k.' :Y- 7
l Xaq i
�Y''
s
w'' t
��i �.�5' W a
.r
u
c
s t i, r
a ,v" F
i: ,z ��F k �i y
C i t: s c„
i :s� `�t
r
3'. �:;s tf b>:�
f
z�'
.�1�...
f
3
y.
n`
k
'",.x's I J tr,...
i>„ c; `k
R Y k a
�e� �fil�
M u'
N
h l
Y, Y -?.Y J v'
2 k' q,.�.
d
t f`-`•. x# c�`�' F s
w' r
�x i x
t 4
y s
n `�S n r ru
2 F.� f 'Y��}' ,J
``y�
(`.k �i""'
.„.s' ,S� :G
a d �k:,
3
2.
d y
f�?
f f
.R^ n s�
h
f
"v.i �m` T:'
'i y
L v`. S S .fc ',v y f
�'H. f i
a a .k
t
L a
F .#..'s'k
y
N
�t
�v
A
{F
I y Y
.l v...,
I
`v �T.�. L 4 (2'3s
s �L 4,'
"i a 3
i
4 f 5'' g y y f `"y
5 v h
,�..�b
f
x, S "r� I
TAn
i t
Y
f
f
d
c,5=, zE
a s,�
s
�s.'
z
z y y e:` azr',:
s
t J� t
f x
u�
E
.y2 N
,x 4.,� a
a,`, t
a�.., rv., 4
l `vG 3� v`
t J
a �-x n.., .t.:
X 7 n,� ri..
i.........�.. _'.;?b,,._.. ......F_.. ,.,_...i_ c:..,t_...: _..t...i.e ..�..._.......,.�h.t..
t k
MEMORANDUM COUNCIL/EDA WORK SESSION
DATE: June 7, 2007
TO: Brooklyn Center City CounciUEDA
FROM: Curt Boganey, City Manag���
SUBJECT: Used Automobile License Ordinance
COUNCII., ACTION REQUIRED
Staff seeks direction regazding the pending license revocation action and challenges to
the existing classification scheme.
BACKGROUND
I have attached a confidential memo from the City Attorney that describes various
reasvns that the City may choose to amend its current ordinance regulating used car
dealerships. Based on this analysis it does not seem to be the best interest of the City
continue with license revocation proceedings at this time.
If the Council is in a eement it would seem that the a ro riate action would be ta
PP P
discontinue the revocation hearing and to direct staff to prepare a new ordinance
governing the licensure of used car dealers.
COUNCIL PQLICY ISSUES
Is the best interest of the City served by continuing with the current ordinance and
Brookdale Ford revocation process?
Is it appropriate and beneficial to modify the ordinance governing used car dealership
licensing?
G:1City MaaageilWORKSESSION.MEM.FRM.dce
I
I
f
r t
"z' �t�. �y
5' r
a
"z ,�"t,� x
ft t
f
fl
a.:t. f fi?�. a
���t zl e t r.. �r r
x 4': `v -5.. h y
f l
x 'r 'a,.
r E r ���'4 �y s,
y 5 F S 2
J y
r I E`" „e'
T:
I j reU i 2 f¢`M y
y r
3
x.
l h.
a
x }4 C T
3 r
m:� c� `��e
r t s
�'Y k'2�3.� l 4F� ��i' �l J
r`"" y T 2
k}' f z, 4�:'� J
,f �:e t, G`:� '4: g
r' <v� i. '?u's�' ".-'F.? b
3 c `�'=�i: f i m
h �%e�a� f
�a
y
z >i; �,�t�,�
3 s "'r7:"�=- `.F
s x '',c
f t�. a
s t
z
r
i
T 'T�c J f C��
i J f l
t x� r
k k f �����h�•�.� a���� v
..'"�w h� f
:vx' aZ t
'x; .�z y t� 1�a�
s'� t
-�.r
�.�:r 4„' ez, �4
s., t
�'i x
.�a�
�t
xs x A /s�T.
f 4
z,*� 2 s I
y k.
.s
2 ..,,,,yn t
�T l.. T.+£ 4 :s
l.
t' 3� a s f
.-�.1 z�.. r 9y a
ys{., $'g�,� �s
s s
rc
r A y'' X
r s �s
a
I r
:r",-,
b F
l
�S Y.��,'
is S�`
r �`w'�,.>t s %�i` t�, r
x:
t� f y J a
3 3 i
t. b
X f„x,
X t J t
F +.j ��ry"�,` 3 t`
Y
f2*�.. ki J�it G, �i
,3�„
1x, 2 �M: A' v
'�.t. C 5 ,v�, '�.2..
h' "J 3,� R
��4^ '4 Y
'4 I f '�t� t. Y �3 4*�
5
5 '.f.+Xi'..
p'�. l
1
h fi w;++
y��, S` K>�
1 `x"�'c 7 z
g 3
�5�+ 4 4 �5, t I Z'rv
3
f
ti
'l�' b'."�` i `�'i
E.. F
t
Y l t
i
S
f J
55
f"` ���a` l 3 `i�:
5 z., ,,.�.,s, c f�.. �;�:i
3 #v�`E. 3-3 �:.�E '�?3
l Y �.`i�'
��.1
�`9 x
�'�-�t�
J
Z
4 w;��.,. r
�'4 I 4 !r.'�= l j
N �`uy
v, �'X3
4. ..7 `�n.,:'
:...0 ......u.. r..r.
�k
MEMORANDUM COUNCIL/EDA WORK SESSION
DATE: June 7, 200'7
TO: Brooklyn Center City CounciUEDA
FROM: Curt Boganey, City Manage�
SUBJECT: 94/694 HWY 100 Redevelopment Area
COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED
The purpose of the discussion is to develop a Council consensus regarding future
direction for the redevelopment of the subject site.
BACKGROUND
The council has held to work sessions to heaz from experts in the area of planning,
marketing and development. Monday, he will pmvide the Council with an overview of
this information and some analysis from the staff perspective. Following the presentation
of this information we would like the Council to provide further guidance regarding the
following:
1. The preferred type of development
2. The preferred method of soliciting development
3. The willingness to provide a subsidy to incent development
COUNCIL POLICY I55UES
1. What type of redevelopment will best serve the redevelopment goals and needs of
the City?
2. What is the best means of attracting the type of development desired?
3. Is a public subsidy appropriate/necessary to attract the development desired? If so,
wha.t type of subsidy should we consider?
G:\City Manager�WORKSESSION.MEM.FRM.doc
L' ^a= z,
r- �:�r i� .�.."i
j'�
r 3 a
,���Z.
s ..:F..
S
X a..�
F y. t l
.r
2::! lY:.^; k3.� Y:
..L.
.2. "Y':� �Tu
t 3
G f..
y �,h`�. 4.
'�e r
t 3. 3"�
z„
rfi r
r`�.
"r x Z .�T� -.r
3 i( r a+
f :'v...t�. n�
e 4 `f'
p`. k� ,P�'� 4 y.ce
j 3
3 a
x
r s
"y a 2-
3'3
'y,�'
"2
�v
L �A y�'v rY `X
x F ,k�'�." N v„ y
V k
m Y
,�a,.�� 5� f r� �'"�'Z
��+7 m E.
y::'
F x3
y
k� Y
^'�'+iV
m. s ns ri�"
4
3: y s .:+J� ,�.,a: s' z�s
'a� i c,� i: i
r f f s
c r u�
�.s
�Y� q
`m ....'v ?i'.?�e
'ui t h'
z�.� 3 Y
%"E ea` S s:� t
a? 4.
4 s..�
w fF,�� tr
e x ��z�
l �a` x�F ."C
Y N C. I
J
Y=�
�I� 2
f
S t i-
4 y.?"-. S I �.j J f� l .y
i�IIR�� ��T.>� nM��i}� �IMMI�' '�I e+�' Fw"
f N t.�
�z`a
F..:.
�c 4 h a" I^�'"�, p {l£ x..c
�t l `�`�5L
5.� �t� i.
Y
a z a..: �4c��
rx a ',�z'' r� ''�'m,�?
q. k R 9
z ^:Y
S 4 .lt:x v �t
y l `t^� T
4 z� `x`=.. fxs�`'�
F 3
2.
�r l t
e y y' i t
f
s
r
c x
r
y,,< .t
s� rz
3
x f
�n n
t �3 s
f
W
h �`Y
:�s
7
t
tp
k�.. v x v �,„,r c. lu c �,'�''r 7
i "i'3 �..z
f q
d
'z F� R Z`�; '.`.:h S *�'#2
x
3 y
a
T
i k
f c a a:
r :�e`
c. x a s f �t
k
fi '�''s:.� �"'�rz.'`�"'z._?..l �1' f�.
n
b f s
,3� �'i l
M 4Y
'ca
L
.r.:
NI zy '.a j ^w
i
x S
f
r
l``. rN c.: G�� z
�3
x
3
g
f t
r
A
s
a�x"`
x....,..,: ...�...e.:. ...3 ,.,�'t _r. ��..W....n. ,m...,....
1
r
I
MEMORANDUM COUNCIL/EDA WORK SESSION
DATE: June 7, 2007
TO: Brooklyn Center City CounciUEDA
FROM: Curt Boganey, City Mana�
SUBJECT: Council Travel Policy
COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED
Staff direction is requested regarding any desired changes in the City Council Travel
Policy 2.06
BACKGROUND
Several weeks ago it was agreed tha.t in accordance with your policy an annual review of
the subject policy would made in advance of budget preparation. BY have this discussion
now any proposed changes that affect the 2008 budget will be reflected in the proposed
budget.
COUNCIL POLICY ISSUES
G:1City ManagealWORKSESSION.MEM.FRM.dce
SECTION II GENERAL POLICIES
City Council Code of Policies
2.06 Policy on City Council Uut-Of-State Travel
1. When Appropriate
conference, course, or training opportunity in the continental United Sta.tes
sponsored by:
o US Conference of Mayors
o National League of Cities
o United States Government or agency thereof
or as authorized in advance by a majority vote of the City Council
2. Expense Limits
actual cost of travel:
o coach air faze or rail
o mileage at IRS rate
to and from terminal or depot
or to and from site of conference, course, or training
o shuttle bus, public transportation, or cab
as required to get to conference events and lodging
if taken to tenninal or depot in Twin Cities
o actual cost of lodging and meals
any costs for persons other than the Council Member are not reimbursed, such
as any cost above the room charge that would have been incurred for the
Council Member alone are not reimbursed
cost of registration, materials, and classes at conference, course, or training
opportunity
o costs of optional events that are primarily social in nature are not
reimbursed
o cost of any person other than the Council Member to attend any event or function is
not reimbursed
3. Procedure for Approval of Travel
as part of the annual budget process, the City Council will identify the maximum
amount of money that may be spent for out of state travel by the Mayor and each
Council Member
provided funds aze available within the limits set by the City Council, a Council
Member ar the Mayor may attend an appropriate event as defined above if
o in the case of a City Council Member, the member has not akeady
traveled out of state in the current year or twice in the member's current
term on the City Council; or
o in the case of the Mayor, if the Mayor has not already traveled out of state
in the current calendax yeaz; or
o by majority vote of the City Council, the travel has been approvad
City of Brooklyn Center 08/14/06 Page 209
SECTION II GENERAL POLICIES
City Council Code of Policies
4. Annual review
the policy shall be reviewed annually at a budget work session to determine if any
changes should be proposed for formal action by the City Council
Reference: City Council Resolution No. 2005-135
2.07 Policy on City Council Travel Expense
Council Members attending approved travel may not purchase conference training materials at
the City's expense unless requested and approved in advance by the City Council.
Reference: City Council Resolution No. 2006-96
City of Brooklyn Center 08/ 14/06 Page 210
,4
1
3
June 6, 2007
1
Re �onal Stormwater Treatment for
g
TIF Dlstrict 3
1
�1
Prepared for:
1
3 City of Brooklyn Center
Agreat place to start. Agreat place to stay.
I
�i
i/ i
WSB Project No. 1143-OS
Prepared by:
1
y_
1
wSB
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 AsspClutes �n�.
Minneapolis, MN 55416 763-541-4800
REGIONAL STORMWATER TREATMENT
FEASIBILITYREPORT
'I FOR
TIF DISTRICT 3
PREPARED FOR THE
CITY OF �ROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA
'I
Tune 6, 2007
Prepared by
WSB Associates, Inc.
701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
I Minneapolis, MN 55416
(763) 541-4800
(763) 541-1700 (fax)
Asso�iates, Inc. Infrastructure 1 Engineering Planning 1 Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Te1:763-541-4800
Fax:763-541-1700
June 6, 2007
Mr. Todd Blomstrom, PE
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Re: Re ional Stormwater Treatment Feasibili Re ort
g tY P
TIF District 3
WSB Project No. 1143-OS
Dear Mr. Blomstrom:
We are pleased to submit to you the attached Regional Stormwater Treatment Feasibility Report for
TIF District 3. This report takes into consideration the proposed plans for development and
redevelopment in TIF District 3 and other areas draining to the 65�` Avenue storm water system.
This report also demonstrates the improvements are feasible, cost effective, and necessary to
provide stormwater treatment for the region, and provides a recommended option for your
consideration.
We would be happy to discuss this report with you at your convenience. Please don't hesitate to
contact me at (763) 287-7182 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
WSB Associates, Inc.
l
Todd E. Hubmer, PE
Project Manager
Enclosure
I
Minneapolis 1 St. Cloud
Equal Opportunity Employer K:10/143-OSIAdminlDocsITlFDist3ReportlFeasibi(iryRepor1060607.doc
Certi acation
f
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional
engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
/6/D 7
Todd E. Hubmer PE Date
Lic. No. 24043
��d�.�z�� /�/a 7
Paul M. Hudalla, PE Date
Lic. No. 42803
Regiona/ Stormwater Treatment Feasibility Report
T/F District 3
Brook/yn Center, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 1143-05
TABLE OF CONTENTS
lA INTRODUCTIONlPURPOSE .........................................................................................1
2 .0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ...............................................................................................2
1 3.0 PROCEDURES METHODS ........................................................................................3
3.1 Stormwater Ponds ..................................................................................................3
3.2 Infiltration Basins ..................................................................................................3
3 .3 Raingardens ............................................................................................................4
3.4 Underground Stormwater Treatment Devices ....................................................4
4.0 IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS ...........................................................................................6
4.1 Option 1— Firehouse Park Treatment Device .....................................................6
4.2 Option 2— Regal Theater Treatment Device .......................................................6
4.3 Option 3—Lateral Storm Sewer Treatment Devices ...........................................7
5 .0 RECOMMENDATION .....................................................................................................8
i
Appendix A
Figures
Appendix B
Cost Estimates
Appendix C
Benefited Areas of the TIF District 3 Regional Treatment System Option 2
Appendix D
I WMWMC Staff Comments on TIF District 3 Regional Treatment System Option 2
i
Re iona! Stormwater Treatment Feasibili Re ort
9 =Y P
TIF District 3
Brook/yn Center, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 1143-05
1.0 INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE
Over the next several years, the City of Brooklyn Center is planning to redevelop portions of
TIF District 3 and to reconstruct streets and utilities within a significant portion of the region
I ff enerated in this re ion
serviced by the 65 Avenue stormwater system. Stormwater runo g g
currently receives little or no stormwater treatment prior to being discharged into to the
Mississippi River. The anticipated redevelopment and street improvement projects provide
opportunity to address, plan, and implement stormwater quality improvements for the
region.
This re ort identifies and evaluates o tions available to provide stormwater treatment for
P P
TIF District 3 and the associated 65` Avenue stormwater system. Background information,
including preliminary redevelopment plans, the City's Comprehensive Surface Water
Management Plan, electronic storm sewer and road profiles, record drawings, and drainage
design calculations were provided by the City. Based on this information, several options
such as ponding, infiltration, and inline treatment systems have been evaluated.
These options, as well as the long-term redevelopment and stormwater management goals of
II the City, have been discussed with City Staff and Staff of the West Mississippi Watershed
Management Commission (WMWMC). Information obtained from these discussions has
been incorporated into the evaluation of options so that the report presents the most cost
effective treatment solutions to address water quality needs of the region.
Regional Stormwater Treatment Feasibility Report
TIF District 3
Brook/yn Center, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 1143-05 Page 1
2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
Approximately 501 acres of developed land within the central portion of Brooklyn Center,
including a portion of TIF District 3, are serviced by the 65 Avenue stormwater system.
This system consists of a 60-inch trunk storm sewer that begins at the intersection of Shingle
Creek Parkway and Freeway Boulevard. The sewer continues east along 65�" Avenue where
it eventually outfalls to the Mississippi River through a 78-inch trunk storm sewer line. The
majority of the contributing flow is from local streets, residential, industrial and commercial
land uses adjacent to 65�` Avenue. Additional flows from approximately 130 acres of land
located south of I-694 flow north under I-694 through a 48-inch pipe that discharges into the
65` Avenue system. In large rainfall events, the 65 Avenue system also may receive
overflow runoff from Shingle Creek.
The drainage area tributary to the 65�' Avenue storm sewer system west of Highway 252 is
illustrated on Figure 3 of this report and boundaries of TIF District No. 3 are shown on
Figure 5.
It is estimated that only 64 acres within this watershed receive some sort of stormwater
treatment before discharging into the trunk system on 65�' Avenue. The remaining 437 acres
drain to the 65�" Avenue system with no runoff treatment provided prior to discharging into
the Mississippi River.
Re iona/ Stormwater Treatment Feasibili Re ort
g tY P
TlF District 3
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 1143-05 Page 2
3.0 PROCEDURE5 METHODS
Four different methods of stormwater treatment including stormwater ponds, infiltration
basins, raingardens, and underground stormwater treatment systems, were considered in
specific locations based on available land area, drainage area, existing storm sewer
configuration, cost, and effectiveness.
Each of these methods of stormwater treatment offer benefits for water quality and may be
suitable to use under certain site conditions. The characteristics of each method and design
criteria used for this analysis are outlined below:
3.1 Stormwater Ponds
Stormwater ponds, also referred to as wet ponds or NURP ponds, are areas of open
water that capture urban stormwater runoff. Common pollutants such as total
suspended solids and phosphorus contained in the runoff are allowed to settle in the
ponds. This reduces the amount of pollutants being transported to downstream
waters. Characteristics of stormwater ponds include the following:
Require open space of approximately 3-6% of the contributing watershed
area.
Require that storm sewer be located at suitable elevations to allow flow in
and out of pond.
Typically remove 40% to 60% of the total phosphorous and 75% to 90% of
the total suspended solids entering the pond.
Skimmer structures at the pond outlet prevent floating materials and debris
from leaving the pond.
Although several locations were considered for stormwater ponds, it was determined
that construction of stormwater ponds are not feasible to treat the flow within the
trunk system. This is primarily due to the storm sewer exceeding 10 feet in depth
and the limited amount, size, and availability of undeveloped or public land adjacent
to the 65�' Avenue Storm Sewer System.
3.2 Infiltration Basins
Inf'iltration basins consist of de ressional areas that collect and inf'iltrate stormwater
P
runoff into the soil. This reduces stormwater runoff volumes and pollutants
discharged downstream and, therefore, improves water quality and reduces chances
of flooding in the area. Characteristics of infiltration basins include the following:
Regiona► Stormwater Tieatment Feasibility Report
T/F District 3
Brooklyn Centei, Minnesota
WSB Project No, 1143-05 Page 3
Treat runoff directed to basins by infiltrating the retained water into the
ground and removing 100% of total phosphorus and total suspended solids.
Requires open space suitable to collect, store and infiltrate water from the
tributary watershed.
i Cannot be utilized in locations where groundwater contamination may occur
or where high ground water elevations exist.
A majority of the drainage area for the 65�' Avenue storm sewer system is located in
the City's Drinking Water Supply Management Area. The City generally
discourages the infiltration of high volumes of urban runoff near municipal water
supply wells to avoid potential contamination of the City's drinking water source.
Due to the storm sewer exceeding 10 feet in depth and the limited amount, size, and
availability of undeveloped or public land adjacent to 65 Avenue, it has been
determined that the use of infiltration basins is not the best regional treatment
solution in this area.
3.3 Raingardens
Raingardens are depressional landscaped areas created on a site-by-site basis that
encourage infiltration of stormwater runoff. They provide water quality treatment
and volume reduction throu h lant u take and infiltration. Characteristics of rain
g p P
gardens include the following:
I� Natural vegetation can be established in raingardens to create landscaping
amenity.
Promotes groundwater recharge and provides rate and volume control for
smaller rainfall events.
Not suitable for locations where groundwater contamination may occur or
where high ground water elevations exist.
Raingardens are currently being constructed in the Riverview neighborhood. The
success of this project should be evaluated over the next several years to determine if
the City would like to pursue additional raingarden projects.
Although raingardens provide infiltration and retention of surface runoff for smaller
areas, regional treatment facilities are a more efficient practice to utilize when there
is a feasible option for regional improvements.
3.4 Underground Stormwater Treatment Devices
Underground stormwater treatment devices are structural systems connected to storm
sewer to treat stormwater runoff. These devices include proprietary products such as
Vortechnics, DrainPac, Stormceptor, and Hydrokleen. The systems, generally made
Regiona/ Stormwater Treat►nent Feasibility Report
TIF District 3
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 1143-OS Page 4
i
with concrete, utilize gravity and the stormwater flow to settle and trap particulate
matter in the device. In order for these devices to function, particulate matter must
be removed from them periodically.
Can be installed at various depths and in relatively small areas.
Typically provide 40% to 80% removal of total suspended solids for a
specific design event.
Typically provide 10% to 30% removal of phosphorus.
Ideal for use in developed urban areas where land is not available to
accommodate other BMPs such as large stormwater ponds.
Due to the limited amount of available public land and the depths of existing storm
sewers, underground treatment devices are the most cost effective, feasible option to
treat stormwater runoff in the subject areas. Several possible locations for
underground treatment devices have been identified and are outlined in Section 4 of
this report followed by recommended options for stormwater treatment in Section 6.
For the analysis performed in this report, the design treatment flow rates have been
determined based on runoff from impervious areas for a one-inch (1.0), 24-hour
storm event. Based on conversations with the Minnesota Climatology office, this
event will provide treatment for up to 90% of all rainfall events that occur annually.
The water quality devices have been sized to remove approximately 80% of the total
suspended solids that drain to the devices for the (1.0 inch) storm event. In addition
to treating design flow rates, the devices will be designed to convey the peak rates
generated by a 10-year, 24-hour storm event which is consistent with the City's storm
sewer design standards. These 10-year flow rates for the storm sewer systems were
determined based on drainage areas provided by the City.
Regional Stormwater Treatment Feasibility Report
TIF Districf 3
Biooklyn Center, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 1143-05 Page 5
4.0 IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS
Three options have been developed to treat runoff from a portion of TIF District 3 and other
areas contributing to the 65�' Avenue trunk storm sewer system. Options one and two
consider using underground stormwater treatment devices at one location to treat the
stormwater flowing through the trunk system, and Option 3 considers constructing a device
on each major lateral where it connects to the trunk storm sewer. Wet sedimentation and
infiltration ponds were not viable options given the amount of available lands, the depths of
the existing storm sewer, and the size of the drainage areas in which they wouid serve.
4.1 Option 1— Firehouse Park Treatment Device
Option 1 provides an underground treatment structure east of the 65 Avenue intersection
with Dupont Avenue that services a contributing drainage area of 372 acres. The trunk
storm sewer at this location is a 66-inch pipe that is 25 feet below ground. This treatment
option will treat a significant runoff area and requires only a single location for maintenance.
The device would be located within Firehouse Park adjacent to the 65 Avenue
reconstruction project and would not require purchase of additional land.
Appenaix B provides a detailed cost estimate for tl�is option. Implementation of Option 1
would require the removal of several mature trees from Firehouse Park. This report does not
assign a specific cost to the aesthetic impact to Firehouse Park due to the construction
requirements of Option 1. See Figure 1 for a map indicating the location of the treatment
device and the drainage area treated by this option.
4.2 Option 2— Regal Theater Treatment Device
Option 2 provides an underground treatment device located southeast of 65 Street and
Camden Avenue in the Regal Movie Theater parking lot. At this location the device is able
to treat a contributing area of 493 acres. The trunk storm sewer at this location is a 72-inch
pipe that is approximately 18 feet below ground. This treatment option removes total
suspended solids from a significant runoff area and would require only a single location for
maintenance.
Furthermore, the location is ideal for maintenance procedures since the site is an open
parking lot with little traffic during maintenance crew working hours. Although this option
offers several benefits, an easement to host the device will need to be acquired from the
owriers of the parceL
Appendix B provides a detailed cost estimate for this option. See Figure 2 for a map
indicating the location of the treatment device and the drainage area treated by this option.
Regional Stormwater Treatment Feasibility Report
T/F District 3
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 1143-05 Page 6
S
4.3 Option 3—Lateral Storm Sewer Treatment Devices
Option 3 provides five underground treatment devices on the five major laterals that connect
to the 65�' Avenue trunk storm sewer line. These devices would treat a total tributary area of
255 acres. These lateral storm sewer sizes range from 18 to 36 inches diameter with a depth
ranging from 8 to 16 feet deep.
This option provides treatment for a large drainage area and keeps the majority of the
I 'i construction within ri ht of wa areas on the 65 Avenue corridor. Maintenance will need
g Y
to be performed on each of the devices to remove accumulated sediment as needed. Since
there axe more treatment devices in this option than the other two options, it can be expected
that the maintenance costs associated with Option 3 will be higher than other treatment
options.
Appendix B provides a detailed cost estimate for this option. See Figure 3 for a map
indicating the location of treatment devices and drainage areas treated by this option.
Option 3 would not receive runoff from the City's I-694 redevelopment site.
Table 1 provides an opinion of cost for the three options presented to provide regional stormwater
treatment for TIF District 3 and the associated 65�' Avenue trunk storxn sewer system.
Table 1
65 Avenue Stormwater Treatment Options
Opinion of Cost
Drainage Trunk or
Area Curve Lateral Depth to
Treated Number Pipe Size `Invert �"Qpinian,of Cost per
Options (Acre.$) CN (inch) �:(Feet)= Cost Acre`7reated��
Option 1 378 I 78 I 66" I 25.2' I $650,000 I; '$1,720
Option 2 I 493 I 80 I 72" I 18.4' I $�50,000 I: `$1',522
i Option 3 $22,000
#1 81.8 90 36" 15.9' $260,700 $3,187
#2 14.0 79 18" 8.0' $103,400 $7,386
#3 79.2 68 36" 14.5' $113,300 $1,431
#4 28.5 76 36" 11.6' $113,300 $3,975
#5 50.5 78 30" 9.0' $113,300 $2,244
TOTAL 254 N/A N/A N/A $726,000 I $2;858 I
Regiona/ Stormwater Treatment Feasibility Report
TIF Districi 3
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
WS8 Project No. 1143-05 Page 7
5.0 RECOMMENDATION
Section 4.0 of this report outlines the stormwater treatment options for TIF District 3 and the
associated 65 Avenue stormwater system. The recommendations presented here are based
on our investigation of the existing stormwater system, costs associated with improvements
and discussions with City and WMWMC staff regarding the long-term stormwater treatment
goals of the City and the Commission. The recommendations are as follows:
It is recommended that the City consider Option 2 as outlined in Section 4.2. This option
provides an underground stormwater treatment system in the movie theater parking lot and
will provide treatment of stormwater runoff from the largest drainage area, including the
City's I-694 redevelopment site.
In addition to treating the largest area, this option also provides the best access for future
maintenance of the system; it is located in an area that has little traffic during maintenance
crew working hours. Furthermore, since there is only one underground treatment device for
this option, costs associated with maintenance will be less costly than having several systems
to maintain.
It is estimated that capital expenditures to construct Option 2 will be 3% more than Option 3
and 15% more than Option 1. When considering the additional axea treated by Option 2, it is
cleaxly the most cost-effective option per acre of drainage area served.
It is recommended that the CiTy work with the provider of the treatment devices to minimize
costs associated with constructing these improvements.
It should be noted that an easement will need to be acquired from the owner of the movie
theater parcel prior to pursuing this option. City Staff and the Owner have been in contact to
negotiate a fair price for the easement. It is anticipated that easements for the project will
cost approximately $22,000.
i This treatment system will provide total suspended solids treatment equivalent to NURP
ponding for 360 acres (see Appendix C). The WMWMC is currently reviewing a proposal
to confirm that they would honor this improvement in lieu of ponding for future
development/redevelopment activities within the City. See Figure 4 for a map indicating
areas that would meet WMWMC's water quality requirements under this proposal.
WMWMC is currently reviewing this proposal and formal action will be taken by the Board
of Commissioners at their June 14�' meeting. Comments from WMWMC staff that were
available are included in Appendix D.
Although this option will remove a significant portion of pollutants, it will not reduce runoff
volumes. Therefore, it is also recommended that the Ciry encourage redeveloping parcels to
incorporate BMPs such as infiltration basins, raingardens, or enhanced ponding techniques
into their site design when feasible.
Regional Stormwater Treatmeni Feasibility Report
TIF District 3
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 1143-05 Page 8
It is concluded that these options are feasible, necessary, and cost effective from an
engineering standpoint as recommended in this report. The proposed improvements are
necessary to provide stormwater treatment prior to discharging stormwater to the Mississippi
River. It is our recommendation that the improvements provided in Section 5 be constructed
as summarized in this report.
1
Regiona/ Stormwater Treatment Feasibility Report
TlF Disfrict 3
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 1143-05 Page 9
File K101143-0SGIS\Maps\Report F g res May\Flgure 1 mxd. May 18. 2007 4 11 OS PM
1 a ���rs� t
1 �q 't' T•���� i. e• i-.� �s �f _'r�e� •i _.Y� }a I�xYE)ti .'i��=p J
d. y. r }k R I� -1�`� �rrt' 'JJ,.
1
F a:
C
f+ r.i' t .1"". .�'C-. �3.; _a" .4.' r \r 1s i i "e� i.;� !a� l J"g?'�
c f G ,:w :y1 -'P"; ��p i,..`�V --�r ;�F t,�� j
=�.��4 L_. y 4, 'a� z
I* -..t .�s�. .F ti a.. r r f 1 y�' �'�c, t� =�t ,r g�
r�' ,�.a:
�v' `KA"a� t �..1.? f 1 (wy.. p�,,. �.'��r, ::y ���v `�'�,a
{'t!' t� si. �.�i.. i 1':.� a=:#, r..� �T v ,1 +rti.i; ��Z"' c. i,'q.
4 k r. c
g 1�'.:' r .i 4
4
�G� .`K. +�i+' i� r s -se:, i,.aNr.rM-�.. �=;:�rH;,r.�e. .v r :r
`�y. v. ""t
t 'S k �sr' I� 'c...' 3I. :a� <Ir.+� 1� P' `l. <T r�.�: �F��
y
.'^tta+ .fi� t
y a 4 il ��.r« i j 1! j R� u ►�i �'.d+• °�,�,.t
'IrG s+ t C".��.,.�'. i r'y.9 1 c :is. 4, y�.!" t t. ri�'�'J4.r�;M!' r .f;�... i,,, ��hr�� `t� t�¢t'£.
f
Y
i ..{,y t'- ;;-'j. Ls .�f y:�, I t ��"e p 1 FL��,.� r t �J t �i„��
.cw t ��i
r r, a� r.:.�� ••�.M�.�` r i> ''�k 1".+^.�nk''��°` w"�s�. ..'.�.J'!pi t`.S "F 7.���
y -yrT(�. i..r'Y.�'.:;�!' J y e� r 1 �,.t'I r
t.::.' p�.:� r
t ��f 1:. f T i, �i� f ��.1.�'�' �1 y�� .�r� ��lr_" y,�t���rA.
c, A. �.i'��.� f taa 1 "I. ?3^�'� y `r' .x .f.�,� t r:
I T
T rf d ,P f ..�r rA '�1� S .1��' 1 ..'.4.
i �?�.,,.it��.,� 1�., w ��s.�+:e __L�
4 r
-«��`'��i yF:r• a,es �r PL����- HsNC�ECREE� �K�,vnr.�-' r
k �ti ��F`- r i�' i R a ��ti�i t t►�(: i�t�� e
+6 F:�' ,.++E. i =.s-�°�° P
}y
1 .e 4
f r R .i `A� c r •.r. r i o 4;-j'�, s
t���
a'; t� I 1 t ;j
`!f` �J� ��e' P 4 1T' Mt, 4, "I' F Z 54 �l .+Yf
t�..�
w;� *�is' '•i a I ,e g tE'•f r
�-7e„� a �*Yr,.. p i .1� h n Mf !4':,Je, t'!.' r,� �t `f`�r r r'. 'j..,P z�-�,�� g•,: <§s .,�,.tx {r r i
w f
w 'R i�I ."�4 'ti 67THAVE r, i�` f �'t'�o I. �if K-r�
r �r a:,� J^ v TH ��r_ 8 ��t�R' a i►-x
�l'1 1 y 7 �lr: r �,,.t r wx*`-' a �f
_r
I
��'4ti i °.ii r' t�' f i �_s.«..�r• r, w �iR��' �k' 1 :d'.
T
t
�`'��s r� t a f Q I o -v I F s I� �1�+�
'�t e�� o v ,7�7 s
0�'� r `--�`4 c' =rte .r `,f' t v i,
i
t ;t-�F r.. Q �,y Y�
1
d ,r
r 7 .p i .,7� y Z z y e e.� {s: i a v t
5
��f
r•��,:i'bfc�
er�A..e�. o?�.'�`' C, ��qa r-e �sTHnvE
v
v �f
L.
ry Q
y� A
...��Fs.� 9 �"s�� ��z 'S 'I �i y e
s
J `i
r '4"� "a ri� �-z...- +u r� w�..
tc: ��i ��i 7 '�..,��,t��x .,�'r�, .�r� 4.'i �C L
-i� s x i a� r i.p
ti� r
y .w` j R �R F P�a
�J� i�}�','�E� F Ef i z +.u�S
i'�` �r r, 1 'f- rr.�l t �4 �r ,fi g 1
v�'c-: �s r[�� s�,di 2i 4 U[��k�;.�, f 'i'` s ft
s s „'r.-. 65TH 1 fi ���,j
Y 7 '3' f F ef �'F o .J! ►s
T_ x. S�4'','.-4� ,T r '`r �1.` f� f e�#3:
i s
V e
�41 :�e �v�'{� a q r 1� 1'u /w..w.-
f AVE r-
4
r x a P' .,r ,x� -'w c
4
w
e a
�a�;i7 w f' :"i� t� r e.r_' x �t i r+-_," �a�' �.E i- �,�t..
1
y y�. �i,. i
�i�. e y ff T- e. ��f- s �.w .z f• �e
a t
q
S�, �♦f� p�.?�'�r ���';iX'3 J��°"�" ..�z w±„�,R,r� J 'j �A'�r'-l�t
�.y�
x� �f',,� f'ql.�-- S JAMES�C .r .�i. .rA,� �a..- f ��n''
�f
R. r r ...,�y d t" I f1-� r'►. ;y'�"- f j ..r p •ws,"*Y1"p t r �'..I �5' '.'"'i"'� 'Y
IRCL"E"N
I r r, R r
a
i t .w t f r'.� r f".�
1 g
'�i t?�:_" �►fr��+ f��•. �-f� a j -=�i�.. .Yr��f�'
,n.
s f, �,,I �,.s-
-=�r?
i� ti
'•��Y a t'.�. k y s �y „�+.:--'.i.� z
�1' 'V�S, "Y�� �Yy..�/t'.J�!�(' a r
s 4�'t�.'�i(•... fV�i�
5
ti J
.i �C.�: �...1 rS ���t �.r _x ''�f
a�.
�ti
ee A .a o 'nE
t y�
i- .t .I� J•.�.Q.�. ;�Y a
7 �s
r j l i P i' Y" 4� S t,i.. 4 y j
j y
r( j r t �C4 i ,��.°AC�`w"� y i' .�r I ��EARLEBh �NCk �i*''�
�.ri ��i` �T.�� a f r ��f�' •-""".�i ��'S' .i: t �v
'71.�E j7� d'' t R�;,: „r_' t k
i `r �1=. I 1 s'r' p �fd,R[� 'r2 �r�t v
r� it.� �t+.: f� �.i p� 'I o `rr a r-irS�r'•
FS' 'Y`i'..�, �f„�f, �P r tr. rr a
f r� sr .f r J_'_- if� �t i r��- t. I �'j,• �s�` i
je
.`.s f +e. 'ir
s �-v j� �t.s 1� f �,yl� y I j �d:: r-
y Y y f �C'. 1 t� *�ii w. .ce �ti; p
s::� �[�r'r��'l ,r 1� y '�+�r` 1 I a�'� a� h�.F� y{�n-�* t"f _'-R�'�� .`x I
T:.:' i e .k.k` ._1'_w 4 ..tF' 4�<.,. �t S s ��,v"' I" f i t�!`+�° r '.1 rt��. 1 ti �y
p .;i ,K� t E• x„ G� ,yl°� �jt� r-ti!�}t Sr�Y ��i n(� I
v e Yc
J
0. �,w f p j� i r ��.;,��C,3'��� a�r�� v� M
y
r l�� i t.��� j k 3 L�
�:�i7. ,�w�. t i� r:, FM x.''� T 4" x s� 1 r t
ar :Y`, a 's��� f
't. h r ''�i °rr r t l� r- 1 .f
r
4.
„c r r r r �t i 1 s i f jr� r z f s
r- r r .s 4 r� �<r. +f�#' �r Storm Sewer
F �j� j ,�-e" :7;;. f 1- i ��i �i D` _'T�rz s��T� t r �i' tr f-,��i�'..`►:,�
f t
�r� r `i�',� y}.� �..�.I. �`�Ir �jis i' n ,s� y �.l"� i".- r- r
4 ;y
.�r �m� x! f i rk t �"f ,t �.b rt ar i y f;�.i:�
x r:�` s, x *'�.�.��r? F' Treatment Area
4 'R'' k t
�t"a�'!.�S?+j,� a�. 7� r .'1 2 i,'��f JE.�,s�� ij-. r t'c �.j� r
R t j �i`:, c ti 1 ,z�.* o r j _Z lg`
��1� Y T 1; f.t����:e ,7'�^w• r a �w f l��rJ, r �'u--� •9c
a� g f�, Tfs C.� 4 ,r,.. �.i T��.-_ .-i�' �w#;.r+l�.'�!•.ri a 3":.. '�J�' r'a i
r d n� f :4f ;r. ���r +v �M�4'.'` 7' j'�` it `:K nY` 1
�'4' i �f r �,5'� i ��i J r�� ,p, F� i t` r�
e 1��. r Treatment Device
r
i r 3 r�`- r= t tr ,��..r X�- s j'1 k t F
s *!-.,��7' t ."�a ,�ir'•� s<r i i a a -*¢rT �-'Fi•�'
?i M^. '.�:t-- N V ii I
dl, .-r r F ��.f'1�"' �'I!�.�� f
r �F� J. m
k �Y�'e� r t .r �r� {..r�k r�'-. i 3`.. 7 e
K. .r�` -a
r-r. a
f r w
i �„�r „p- j. i y y ''f D� �4 k.>'.":t'E tu t�� r,,�`"[€ �i r
y F b
f x y 3 i x�, f r, r
}.�e .r.� �F.. x ',I �r�° r a y J ta r`eR �r T PIPE
TREATMEN
,_F ;�L_7 �T �'�:i ��.f�'�
I t t 1_ A
4 ,,�.,.:a AREA ACRES CN SIZE DEPTH
r s c ra.s �oa 'wn es I "t .E'� 'Y` .k J r?'r
�-1�.. i `•.�'�N, °,.s.� �..i.. -F ,r �l A�i;.t'_`Lf. t- �5'..;t.
�r 3�
i��.aVj� r"t *'„x��� ..5� r -wc �i� l� Yt?I }1 t' .y� f',' 4 �f!`.±� �i�� Q �]Q 11 1
�F
s ���q �r� x�"k� '.r,..y 3ab.. t..":';:°.-_ .�x� �-EL'a` �1►�� [=w:'C.� �'�7! �:'�f'r�,� ��'`tt"'�f!'f. ��V V
�t�
66 25 2
r-• f E r r ,p
w 1 J�,.� Jr`� lfi.P� ,s-.�.._.,�,.�--'_� -�--.:.Y` ���d.�"��.�� ���d''�.�'���,. !�t i�. F e 11€ �i�7�1. ��1�
k"
'4
r �,..,,K.
TIF District 3 Regional Stormwater Treatment System Option 1 N Figure 1 I
for I
City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota W E I
City of Brooklyn Center 0 500 1,000 2,000 wSB
Agreat place to start. Agreat p(ace to stay. Feet S
Associmes. ln<�.
F le K OSGIS\Maps`Report F�i 3 ires May\Fig e 2.mxd. May 1A. 2007 4 i6� 12 PM
i^;: i i i s: r t �,;y a y t �"T..
,r r r rR r y Y j �1 j .i'
ti.. h�.. ♦A., M r'F X P::+}� A e 1 i
,i Tw �i"., j� p t r a.�� a S;, p
y v�
�i. r. r'';--•, k ��l t e... p f� .f`�. .r�z a: t e° m �r'�""'!Srt�: T� fpn
.s <,r :i r s.. '4` #:�.:.t: �y.v �r 4� �.r`*"i iF:Y�ry t �M y „6_ ��.r.: :i �es+�' �'�a� p'
»_�w. ..r.•� r :.:c �,Ar .t-'i a. f' .r aa�..��g! 1 I ':J
yt p p
!at�- s.i �a��..� �a..a i� ...,.:Ts� .._:y `Y� ��'4, '{�c h• i r `�j' rY
e..- r, wC-.`e.. .�..w �6 t 5 4" �{:�j r�� .Y. f r G �t�'�;d I e1! L
r
�c T,�; �r�"'r1�
r r< tr. +C r 1� .�.r ..r ('l.., j
6
r+� l3�� a.. r� i r -.:Y '�'�*I �:?ll� t� :K. �r�
v. F' �.0 t m
_�r �i �F. �a? s� a��� °a�G �,y 7" t
x �v -rt ,ltinvF y
y
>>et��� t �t e> '��#s�..t�.;_. ...d+: .ax �rr.
7
n .rRa:_. '�ay. 4`s�. ...iK. ..:.we.� =�aMY a .5" '�}�-.`r'�
'�G'_ w �"1+°.: r x R I I r'*!�^ �4, _;f. r 1 h" f tr y_ rv I y c'
1 r�� ,y�
�f r r r
r �.t ft Jc �r�' R 1 k 6�Y �>�t 4 -rr ,r ;z a,y±,�.-
r �r: f� rt S �s� .r T"a .:.,rF f l s�+^,t.. y n
�s �.,r.s. �r- r�{. -.4 ��,.;t�✓ I�� 1
y F
f t�� ,,.C-�. J ,r x� K�� 1 f s 'ry.,;!! i .+.;�r �"i t'_ 7R±^lw-r,ys,�` 1
f f� .Y�.• a T' ,,+}t�' 'l r •�,a t :•3
y .f f: "f r ,..Y" �r� i� ��i F� i
4
�i. �:P.. Ce 4 �.n� J r �:c' r r= .r t,� '�J;�:,�.`}'$�A. w.>`
r f� r r n �{i c t
�.:�r�� s"° s� �"�iiW f f .,r. ,1.,� t 1 �a��_
,�t t
f r °�r�.�.� Y y Y U �f��. x T �^r'►f"'
�':4. '�'i y r:O. t.. rgt SHINGLE CREE�PfRK4YA`4�:�: s �'r" �yi, 1
t r
r .�IRt��'� r}' F .,.r.�.` t l- w �b f x 4
-r t r" 1.,, y r r 'f 'i
�f _��a� z }v ¢�,ti F
L `t E •'r-•�j <3:�,4� ��.i' F4 j aa i
a i�..
�'YlT+..� s fi =�it� 'I_ M.. ..J l Q r N t
IF"r f::u��;Er��+i.. i �i�`'ry,��' 'r..fiy� 'r :,7 Y, t
j z +�t,� j a 1
`ti,a a ,e_ r r p �r f `��T 67TH AV E I .�p:�,...,
4 v {r +r v �s .1 f �f r I p t f-p� Q 4
��k S r �h� 67THAVE� �Q F.
F
F:�..i
.�,i�'*. r ;t� .���.-7` a t,... 3 .;�'.�f
r
�1i, s 1 ';a'., 1�...-w x
;�'�l�iF...�.,�t� i% �i' 1�� k�, .�+R�"�''.�
e
r ?�"<r.+e�t', i •t� t�..: a' �o .�e��� .v'
r
4
z �R� m w
S.� m a� z Cv� Q a;
k
T_
`iT _w���� 1{ l r. 1. o J
D.'a' i's s i y' x t r 1
F a w rI�'��' w �a�� .c..�.. +t 667H AvE P� 4
i
Pt,• �`4 �i`�r�.'' �faF..;f ��,.y 4 a
.�y f
y
�1
1 i. ��4 y N. J
�ft C� .�w �.VI>���'� �i a a y! �t'� l
E 1 4e i.. P Y F�- I �i �I 5 R:. f� .Rl��
.JC' -�.".Y Y f ���fi F'
'��If ��,e �,r'v� r+r' •4� y eE way a o� a. :8 m r �r 1 r�� 9 A
v f �w� YJr�. t ��T�
�qRD Iz I
r
-e y a 657HAVE y
S r
4 f
{;.'�_7�`�'+� Y���?�� RJ y(- i a� i i y�. ��!P
r
±�T
<i'i-4 TF ''��z.:<�,�v R I a
e
r f� t �l•y t 1.4 S`� �>-c'� YR ;'(�F �j r r=;
�1�•
t r�
�v. E.'� L ��'!�F�i r �s� �,7 z �z w k r±��+a.swJRq,
�a i.�..'. �fi t,�. w �7 T.� X 'a"+rt.';�/ 1 fi i I JAMES�"CIRCL'E'IV j w
o r _�r
/l. a Z
+a f
4
.e
.r v� 'd 'F� f� ..r`'�_� r !1_ T y L. 4 r »a+�
�A t F A- r
y z. a �'�:i
r
.t ;,p:.� ..9:�t -"::t .reF... �"ie.if: s f -a �.w��'. 1.."�
o
i T'�`'' r��. �;'�.r'�:t� �-���t���'�'-i 'i" w ,-e -wt.:' �a�
t
_y. a G. W ?s Y r. ,�9 �i� ,o ,�.F���� r`C.
I
t.
k` �T �.3'1-•�T�� 'i��'�'��`_``,�y F
I
,y �i. t
�j��
�s.
t K i '7_�'�' x:' e �T, �"3`�ti!'� r,.� t:�te:. i 1
t 4 r,�� T G. -.il. *t
r.
z i ..�a. t i
v
T..
o
,�5+� �I Y
_..yV}...
r �r *,s t�'s 7 3 `4.i 1 1:r t u, r •t�, ,g L�_
7
C T '.�.il.� .Y :l, •°r�' �f: _a. �t,r� R '..��';j\'.
y
w
t. o
M i S
a�
'1 f� r 'r' s enR�e, eR !;F r'►� 4 �°r�
•`t• l �-l. y �r �I .r t:
j` A t 4� Y t t •a
•`a�,�' i, i; ��"�,�-N ix :v:r�k i e.f�; ��-.'7�.s; Y,
T, 'r.
�,�3'��, ��..�j�� c; —Y. f`. ;�5 r t �+i� r
a
'��.�.s.�..�.��1 s� ���.,T ♦t� ..7- Z. f .Sr4.it5;�i�'��.+, �,�t?";' s
r
i
r1-i _..f� a °P�,'f� �r �V j 1' 7 w- w.� x� sL+E'1'.: r �L�.,
,t�r r. t at L n d
i a` 1 __�r`�st, i�� I 1 -�i t F��s' �.�t� lF.. +_t. ��w�.,� r,�� e�e
j
tr•i�� ��1 5�,���-.!• -�r-� a �`-u. k ;",a�..K,. rr•�':� `.i 7`...�3 �,.'s
f x
J
;,a.Y r�� l� 'G. �.F t L ,rt' ���f i� rt FS.
x J f5 r�` i r r t s y ;'E i� y 1 i r a
g 5 �}y� �`M` aF�, �'�N N t 3+�Sr��,Y �A E'� �r'*1•� .�t
i� t r s :r' i 1� �d "�t t�+ss s r k
r
�Y f FZf f
1
t r .+r+. .n f �rs���t .,c j i y s,ri�. 't� �`i' P s t s
f J�'t
F s 1 r 7 r n a r t t r'� j�� t
7 91� 3,.( :�J �f�P"
-.-s.r�:�.;.��'e'�'� .°r `l.��a.�":Y�..�'f s ��.+tt 'f;..rer �.�1a?',$i E` �,.tl.:s��.� k
��.t r r Treatment Device
_'`�.+i�.a� �,s, .l�,w �.i� 4l� l ,�i r �e� .tip t r" �....rY
`rs ���fi b\, r :�-�•�.,�.a -..r y �a�_��r �:s r�,� i
x �r s� L� t� g ,.r ,.j �a-„ d K j�.g t r 1 �:T. a`
.r:
����.+4���: Yi�l' _y �e r,�'_' `a,� ,s� 'l,jerr;?' fr::' ��'t P e"+r .S`-i�*�Y `�€s
torm Sewer
a.
S
y'�. ,.,�r� r r k r�f i j..{ df' 5. i+ �t-?++.4*-�, ,C� I� �„4..�:M ai:�_ T- �7� t�' �:..�i'
w T; p
t'�.. �#S� T �t e.,-'F' -al ^�4a4 �r��>I�r►.,F���' f
w� i .y f
"`�"X *i e 4 [,y;. ���.-r r.�.FC�Er�.�'��,-_.� i�
j i; �.iFw� ..,1 k a 4 �s"'..
3� r �r r Lr r• x x� •.r� TreatmentAre
�w
'��rJ; r��.'t �i,�,r`7�!`�f �r� qL� .v�:r�,._ a.s eo�''c!. i ,�i'� `_�r r�l'�t°',1 r� G�
j
#`Jt C f.... L.. F ti r ta, 7 t irl.r.�� �t t i Er .R Y� 'v t' ��l� �w,� 'f F
f'�f
�q' t .��r +J'!�' ��y,. �-.f: i� r r <�M� Ty; 1
�I`
r��� i i t .r �r �,c� r°. a .�'iia ki f' .'3 �.r '�.ci�t p
r
f
f �r�� ,�;r -��'s- ��s. d c �s� i 'a, k
�r
r' ,t3-.1 T� ;I'�- j.•,�,.l, 4 �;s d f f T
c
�t}�
,1" v.z t �,,.�J3. k�:.�a-��..i r.� f t e y "��.a�
_��"'r_
�r
�i F
i .t, I�.fr 9C'�. i'� w r r ..f' �.'.i h� 1 f w�',;�; t r' 1 Y t
y�
r. e
y
4 :,',�r'� C:!6�� ��i iw �S .f 4'� i �e ;y' t� �'k.1�� Jr'.
{f� -=r'#.. r i.c.i-,� a K .N:z.� �t r���j.� I �r ^T t' Tt� ����F�3.*�!f� i
R, �K.��A.}��•- ar _,�S at �X. �it��•� '�h��4="�.� t.}����.��
4. :S ,t �r` �r� A ��e�: 1 -ii �i��
t�:rt� .j'� �.�.t+r 1 I ,.ri. ���a.�� ,,K^�x� w:r� `si �'n�� ��:��.'�`i-;:
1.,. q y r
-r. c N` s ;1.; �.;;�`i
t r TREATMENT PIPE
r f j ,I��. r;'F�.e-.. ��e. .:.:.sw�a r "'s �.d'.�" i,�'� .�f S` �'W� cf' 1 y
t��
3 t f 7"41*-" f i� r Y t i i L
t t j 1�r
g
i'a��,� �f r #�1. «w 1 l�T� 1L�"' j`..' Y'. �`"'a} I
a�l. _�����.��-y '��v::� ����:��-rt r: ACRES CN IZE DEPTH
+r,+'. r 'y �r
�T,. ,r
f �Z �'";:.'�w t' `Y- i� t� F ff �+L t y. r• n e. .,a
1
•'d. 1 �...(J`�- .sa_.�.. s l_ r- �ll�`�+D -��''4 r y+ E J F�. r•� ,j ,r n
a�.. ..r "1'i. 5 s ..�a. h#„ r a �•r• t�F e f f t i Q
n TOTAL 4 80 72 18 4
iV t:��r.. tr ��F� $"F k„ i i 3 f �1 ,�:Y --4 �i �e 4.'T. x T. r 4 w: ��.N�'2[ �Y�� 5 V V
1 ..,�n: a
s
t--= f-� �t,rr� :.-3-:} 7
TIF District 3 Regiona/ Storrnwater Treatment S stem O tion 2 Figure 2
y p N
for
City of Brooklyn Center City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota W E wsB
Agreat place to start. Agreat place to stay. O 500 1,000 2,000
Feet u
,�.t�.,<,��«,r�-.,�. t.,��
File: K101143-05\GIS\Maps�RepoA Pig res May\Figure 3mxd. May 18. 200� 4�1634 PM
'+l J
r
r.....� F'�R ..�bts'�' r T -jr xi 5• t -.j
R 1
RR
y. ,°k ststs+ .T Q�, t .3i. �j� .�i i xy`� :::.r N..-:� s�z.. Y �.}�fy
P a
I
69TH AVE
i
_a �y, tE'
f -•e...sr w ��1" �..a.. 4 s*}�'�" -:f�
�vr 6�' t,�.��5��►�1!lSh1�` f� .s�� r x ff �6',T
�r- -s.� 'Af��► ���-'r s� ya- ,I L��7'`� s L�
Wc:� �...��'�Nt«��� F,.- •j-; t.!!'�i-R' �e
s, y P� l� y t• r .3
R e i Y 1:, C r .r r ..f i r. j
1 t" C' !1U �1`�{ �'�e .va>r.�t,•�;�;
r
s�... 'S,
c,.,. f ,s�
w...1. i� 1� fi �ls�.` ��a a e_
-c ,v,. �C. p,�..� .t" .7s'§ f i r T�
m
.a s: JI. e�� 1� ,1 :'�y. AY ^e y
r r` f
r
,,,,A,
r a��
5. a
y
r 3 e air: i 1 y �'Q }}�jM
r=�
g
�SHINGLE GREEK PARItWA�Y°: �"t� �O� +4+.�`` t y ,�z:
��.._!f� i
t a" a �V� y d.' {7 r��' t x .w�..���,.',�s(.
...s z y �I 1�'' rt r� s s�. r
w
z> '��t
Z �r: T �A 3�� ��.�e,R.,+� 1
J
v
W r� y
;�r,
r
P Q .6 S
,t,•.•• �5 Z �te tw
r.
w a�
�f"" I, r
#3
'i .ra' f ,T 67TH AVE 67TH•AVE �g r �'£a `�C +�':.:.,i� �+x�`�
t.F
p. x,� i� T. L'
l
'A. }n�� �YR M� x d�' ��i= `'Y
s 4 t r a U t :�c
F y t ��'�S �K
w
i 3
J
tAc ,p h t Q g�' i r �#�b�r�
U f
�'a F e t fl�
p >,V� r�" r.�
�r� l��
S J. w e�
t-
m Q y,� s
t�. r: �G H i ��'t
tr�= Z. t d�
i
r F' W ��Q� r�,� I i+`
eti d, Q �"z 4 �r' i.
r
o -F' 4'
t p i� r. r C11r t
!s 1
m
�i i d t
s
'm. i 11J is ��Q ti r
4
L
.s
�;3'. r. �i; l i >5 V
�'4.. ��;v e, .i f r' 'Q :e: t Z��� e ,J`:,- S z �<r` �f! a �'j�
F
n
�.F p pi d ��;�..w 3= a aY.� n r 7.�
�ru 'iC" �F �e 3 3 ��.s Q''' i'` �a,
.r r
_)�R "L6� �kj "st ,.��°u�a p s z' °e
g f9. b-=M t •m r t
c f z
1"
r
ti�
r P t x
FEtEE� 65TH I 4.
t� ,I �\a e. r .m
L d
f r�, e�e
S� r �{i r r 4 �f] 4 ra �y�
r t f i�
v r '�W� M1 ��r..
q r A Y� �I �L tW J �t.
r z �r Storm Sewer
1:.. z w s r r
r 'r f a z �,'.�r
Af Q Z T.j� Existing Treatment Area
s f �""j JAMES CIRCLE N ����,f". �4 x {'•�`r�
t
r
�i +w W W
,,,r
p
Pr posed Treatment Area
e t q��
r �e r w w O r �i
3�'
i a
x j
�'d� Y ��«iii7: -i' �.e, �r
x
x
Treatment Device
k
z
r
a�
„�'s�
m
a..
PIPE
E
I
p
PTH
_z_
""�i,�
f e
E
6�� w�' Z
h
1
DE
a 81.1 90 36 15. 9
s A r
y EARLE�BROWN�DR'� q �e'•�
s r .-�+1►� T.
-•r� #2 15. 2 79 18" 8 0'
�r. y z r,
r r;
j o >t: I.�,'.��,�..rfr� r ��ib'� j
I'.. f �»"1": X,w� R j `��T.��,� tt,. r4� .w. 36 1 4. 5
#3 79.2 68
.t
•_��i�rz �1- y �i,• F i�
y r r'
�,�r. .r �t #4 28.5 76 36 11.6
E .i,,
t R� 1�f"
ti i
3 �_�i =t��� t t ti'� �C`r�M� �i�€ ;r' °i4�.� r „+t��R. i nk"�^«` K�� .5 U 3��� 9.
.s.. s ��rt._'av� �E�•_�e� v a i I 5� I 7 I I
-y
J' i�i �r�l3 i .+r
TIF District 3 Regiona/ Stormwater Treatment System Option 3 rv Figure 3
for
City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota w E
Ci o Brookl n Center 0 300 600 1,200 �SB
ty f y Feet
Agreat place to atart. Agreat place to stay. S
Associaleti�. lnc.
F le: K:�01143 OSGIS�Maps\Report Flgures May\Flgure 4 mxd. May 18. 2007 4�16 12 PM
1' �.4 ,i`� .a }t 3� f .,`t!�*•.�('Z�'� �-���r r,'r-�io1 i z 7. .1� �'�t;��
1 t P. 1 J`1 �t:-s='- d- i.j� :�y I' 7 r�.ri� a� v J
3'f'sJt.. ,�sr� 7'4 A *�r' �r fi�':��-y`. �+S �S
{'�"fst, l Fc. �r ti 4-4'� ��IP%d� F r�a ,r �T x y ti
.,,,tz. w �:y� Le end
e}
j
i�°.1cI��iR..,..�a��� .��R�• t .jt,.� `r r�' 1-. f �S >�qr �r f .g�.. _t T�
..�w i. Ct
a p
r r r r r 'y h,
-�.;...,.r� �E .�.:J. R a��.r' t .I.:.; .�.C�4.�� �C ...Y r.,�" c. �a
�T' f.:'..',:. .t ..iTHFt.E y
,x��;r' �'I 1� ,#-._1. ..�4 ._vR�:�' .y ,s. 'w .RR�
f� F .a -.,r:,r. 'R '^f s-�� j Treatment Device
'�-ft -r i. '�y �.r�r."". `�4' ,f� .�r^°* '�t'. .i .3_. t .i'iy x"
r j a b jy- i- a' J° `i l
'e, e t.f''�. t a �"r F5.
j
_a.�. j .r 3 "�-1��, F T 'k .a, r. 1:,
t� �ya 1 ..�•i. .E a�: +i-ek� ',�r i;�`�.. �,�-'b� .t�: wii �t`:� �'4�'F+'.,".
1 f i r i �9 '�.rl�� +i. ��?k 14 S`
t x u 4 r t�� r TreatmentAr
r y !F` +k a.se v 3 t �f t�r r.�. r i f ='s". r P.C3
.n:.r. f 'F rt�.d�t. d r .w� •:�r .e a' �+�Ir�'w !�.'t#.
i,,+�._.
r 9 ti,.„. -�Y *e
_.-a_� 'e,�*.� s wr�' 1`. .�,z 1 r r z8[i�' ra=•F•y-.• f"'"T,^. �e;. :d'". er� 6F ��Ft s _!!'�f• A �%s'� ti 1..4 t.
q w
.,Ts- r t t
p
i[ "'rp'. ,r- k,'..� ��j�wf,. 1y.. ��:-:w� t �C"."'h`�� l,}.?"±. ,r`..-_.�- t ta. k
..h��� �r, 'q �I J:;�i y��,�: 'SHINGLE.GREEK'PARKWAY'_ 4 Y;^f r, f. �Cq�.w.�� s Sewer
t `"F 1 I'� E�.,..� z�' i _;r_'� r.. t �'�z1''�.J+'!. ;;i torm
S
...Y
r� r�{ r �r ,.�t f- �I r j� r r :r_'
fi
-r.
r` `...�t 3 •`r Z a ......�,�-���.r r 4 1 i Y �y T ..i� z�,•��`� 9. }i=�7.k"'�b wrw�t�,fi.
S�.}�Yitft' 4� Y'"� I `a F, ���l Jw.. `��}�.I ..J 1 �`k J` L y 4 Water Quality
n T I? ,Y 1 1. :�.�`A �j j�.i._ a ty, C 1' i ,-.e w a t� ���.:i.� 4 �t!-���
�'�`'=k. �.��T �c.. T 1� +t '�R� p.:i ��I"'_ 1 z'. i ji' t �.....1K' dr.
a
yc.m,f�y� ..y w. `�;��a/ f-�.'.� �f`C ,i.l �f"°" f �f��o �3� F^; 'a 'A�tr' ,P
Y W Treatment Credit Area
w P r�a..�.
���d i f.m .'a�a 1 -a" .C. 4 _1- �a j�� 5, 4 i
k..:.� -t-_'_," .'t�'4R''�,, r 7 fr..+`-^ M. `�+3i c� :k
t. �sY 67THAVE T 67THAUF
r -��'y t �Y. /p Y
Y S" l,. ..Y J `.Yrt.: nA �e 2 �.'i'�_.
.:'��ty g �a v r �..rs;�.. y a �a t ��xa�^ �r�
w .R, y
g
A �T� Y 1
,1� r
I !,.t �ss. ;�'G;. j o "•'�f ;^rR<,� i. �..,�p
i e r
��Pt' "a j .1 '?`�e.. V' x t° o 1 }f. f�i -}�i �a rv
��i= .1. m
T e�� .i �Pt x ;eS tl -J w'� f t
e t".r_.�y{� �.i:��,h`.�`�r� xr ��.,�.....i x
�a'F�.N� ,ry�r� •.c�';, F �'d":. �j 66THAVE r��'��
t'�� :s aw e 1 i t t. �y
A F �F��.�. Y Y. -•I.I.�IS� �I�-� I Q ..Z .T �,.M'
�f�r�'�'�V+ �'T f A r��• +i
Ct� �i. f M' �'t �•E.� .r���k,,. �1 I ,,c'_ E
y I u 4
..��t i.l�t s�r�--�'`..".'„� FR «�•'�Y� a u� ...��I �.�a r
�y�_
L
4t� �,d _FWqy� f reF Sf .1
..a.
o�„ i gF r h
E
1 �r �Y': a±;. t�«1 w�t� L! ,�-:,f",�, t� ,�.s�_�-� �qRO" +Iii9°.�?*.�� �ry
r�
G I i x
�w 65TH
t� f �I �',�t. r ��w.. s�� A a a r �.Ww �..T �`r"' F e' :fj'"^
J
r s
r. I r� E �i�; e,�e r �4�' �:��a�
�,�p s('`�� '.t* �r i t `R: x
e R -S r
y l r t r��� f.{; 4! s ,r� r �s r �Y ;,F�� w 1 a��. �i�� O
r� r s:: :r3-4 r� r 1. t „i;� .y
d
I
i
t �f �z p 4 i
�!''1 ..t i t� �,:i:r_� 1 �y z ��Y� 1+
��*i j r. �,+v�j?� �r� �w._rJ�;�S �:.t- JAME CIRCL"E'N .f�' a z 4 A.. r♦, �x
a p
�r, Z a z i
f y t �i� �c C
Y T ai� 2_� r ,�,''s�'; P� Rio i
Y 3
f'
.r�. �c S f �.d: S ..y&:!+.a..
r
n �r �.'t'� �ir'� 0 p. G.--�� „"S'�� �.o... ,.�y
x
.a v
�4 �ilj r ,r,, �y: r,y, .l�">.?�� .a �i'.;" br r t .`x,. g
��,e v t _.-.�'.4. r.�- a„ek..� v'i 'I���
`n�('�_
ty4, �.r�1 �t �i�.-� ...�-_.`---c
r
u��
't t i �s� e ti I r `-h� �t
t t.,. �i �r at a c .e '-'rit i "`C� :�',,1. t I ��o e i
.f•.l•4, t�1 Y ..f 7 y M
z
4 t
?ti {�.:n� __��"C�4F1., i .lr ?1�� r .�y. ,1 J f!'
1 j�Y .3 j'3 ���-j .3 j r
'x'��
...a N� t .�i j jJ .f �.4` f y( a �eR 1 s r �y�
l�L� 1 f S .7 J_+" 9 a+K �J� i ���1 �-�rr� r R �ti f 4 rc j f o"� S �S
/r t
�j�
i E
r. "r.T ��r ::lu .t 'a i i �i�
i f'
+s"*. rsa� t :y ��'".1�� 7 ����,r ts-�:�� ��t� f S ft
,.f� l i' 't �R j� t� 7 �c r '.m, 'T.:C,`
n
y
a ,u
r q`. y }�y� `.yE r: a �Y i t a f
2 q 1
r y� i ir e. ,v 1` I ,.t,, y �rr �i ,,�r
�``�"k.�...�.� li �,.....r r. Y1� ,f k N_1;1�;4��+ a: rJ M '�r 1_,
rT i
y .q .ti1 F•sf'� .�7� s4';.. ,a; s+z- r -a� ik d�� v�!�4� .f� tit"�.
g/ g
y
4. +T� 4 dn. af' `#A F �t ..a f y ��.y
�.x -:.��!�,�,��+4 :S! H.:,-�` 6_ ta# t'r� r�c- F�` �f.5 �i�•-�"�-
i
.f �:�t".Y` f �E�� e�,`� i.�
r m �s
-c f �w �i ,�I' t �4 f
a:.� t*�d�".: t;"ar Yi .z� F� r� _�/1 ��E r �'�i'' f ;3�1� i
r'- r s 'I�� p ''y' y �jy� `,`ir r 1 !F� t� i
�a.
r .4F� i _i Y r��x-f r �Y fir 4����.�
i` c��s s s- '-a -Y, f f '�`��g`'',� Each Treatment Credit is for 1 acre of land
.�p t
4 s f,
f �i �y
„f�.. Yr 3 h c I f
J- f �R that meets WMWMCs rules for water quality
,�a.;� -:i- r �a
s�+�'�� T� P t P f. f�� Q i';� C. i t
3,�; r x:�- f r .�C��r due to construction of proposed treatment device
ro
t r �id'� r 'r r ,w.r x F. v ti- z
a �.r ,�.rr r
r �s� sf,��
I ��lF� �..�-.i: r ti�.�� aC �'ft; r t iwc- t t r 4 r-# Z`
r.
�i i,' ��r�� r �f
.,T t d f i s 5,
j .r�� ,.f� ,�t�,�Y;P+ fi�,: .a, k� r �i N''� �R�� I.
._w,.n r t.�� Pro osed treatment device will rovide 360
i:. :r a�?� t �r i�': r r�:r r a �r* 3:�'�"`�a �:-"��#M ��:.:i �l,iR z p p
�>�r r-°.• �r �-�;;t t� .>t. treatment credits for the areas as indicated in this
f .y r* �i �r .R,� .`Q' t.r� S-# 1 t
,s -a f r �f� �.r.. v ���'..k� r-�� t Figure
y
i �,`�r r r- r r.'►- ;t. �c.° `�i J .e'��` t :i �ra"� �..=yt%+", `ia
r' �f- 4�; E �-�-�if�.: �-�r�` ,_.if a i ce�- �qr^ ,.�':r�
r r {T !t y E ��.1� �F��.: t�,~;Y _"k »y,i r 't'
�f" �j t�C'{��. y• r-�� l .,c .4� iti: �a��'� t.� .M�`
i
:c'.�, r r �t s .r i t''` �tR e!� �.q ,:r6;'.--*�'' r� t ,1{ a,
i E''sr r°:sf y
T t
h
i 1 f 4
}'t ;f.l 'l."'-7 i .1. I *1"rl. ;,\,r�� .}.-r,�,,,�,�,r �,ff r
i !"�"'*'Ps F l�� i�1► .w f.. 3{ 9 r r �p ,k� t �_t' F t
ff t.�,�dt y�.�_.-r �s �r-� �a� t+� f S. ;j' t��� �.k:'-r `1�.:
p, a` +,,..::C .2.� `�t,i �.,��'�.f� ...'�i t, r� i t i 1.-v+� f �a'r,-
c,� i. �j�_.__ J s,-e� •r+=:�•e=, a
V a. j ,f� ",.d�S�: '�,.a.-u_'< i t .r f .Y5.
44
r i I't a i
�t-' a�r p s�. r' �ti i,r �q' i`tl,N! Y f. 1 i. a f, k
y
r
.2�k'��� �,.f, i�- .:Y" .I.' ..wiw r``� '%�1�.� j,�, "F -�.r:..
I s.� �4f. .�..Rta,.„ j_j? �a i o r �'�..��y v 'y!,. yi� �p u
;i,f+ i T r.,. 7 F'�' L �'k 1f �.s��� 'RY �x�?'s� r 'Z� �E w i'�� :r� E
±t.'k=2:�ss,�:1����,� s*�ti I _i �T �-.7 't .�i! w t p` .r r 't' "�.{e"�. r-:� r�'� S.
q,
i 3
P -n 1 F f y `��c'� t r w r�.'�t 3 at F _p
Y �i L�F �4
a p c
.r r
�r .,r.
r
„++K f a.� I ,j s e 4I t
r
w.' t,:;:aex's. ���Y4 i._ Cl'� :l.`��� c,.'� i ��-`a�.+��, .�-`+-3i r
WMWMC Water Quality Treatment Credits
TIF District 3 Regiona/ Treatment System Option 2 N
Figure 4
for
City of Brooklyn Center Clt of Brookl n Center Minnesota W E
v y I/I�SB
A great p/aee to start. A 1;reot place to stay. O 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
:Iss�ocintes, lnr
t
1 y.� -�j� }—j �'�i� r����
1���� E��� (�'i��
�r,
A
L
��1
r
�k
J�`c i I 4 t i I r t ��'�'�l�Il� r--
.��:a
ri� 1 w
irr utIItirri7,,-
�I.�IiiLll y\
r
���+r��l i ���f'`1�i} �V q
l�
C r iil v
�Y` t ,.�-c:�n
+�r� ��?t� ~�flff��f[�$; ��i��'ft�,�' p
I; 1�� ;�E14�.� c�—`
t �1-�:_ �r� 1�t7,'�L�7 i� I t'�
�ni�i�5�
i
��t��;
T
r
�J j�
?��s-} f �1��� u;�=�
��3
t�ft; I
;��1.�, l, <I"' 11 c�
i `4 I r_t7��' �l
�V� F,'C c�:
��.,i������
f Y -r
f
�-ti-„�r ,.11rm
■1!
Legend
TIF District #2 #s
none #3 #3
�#1 -#4 �#3
Figure 5
City of Brooklyn Center TIF Districts
City of Brooklyn Center �/�/S'B
A great place to start. A great place to stay.
Associates. /nc.
I
Appendix B
Cost Estimates
I i Re i na! f rmwater Treatment Feasibili Re ort
g o S o ty p
T!F Districf 3
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 1143-05
I''',
i
1
Strormwater Treatment Feasibility Report
Feasibility Report
TIF District 3
OPTION 1 Treatment Devices at Dupont Ave 65th
Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Mobilization 1 EA $20,000) $20,000
Vortech 2538 CIP I 2I EA I $220,000� $440,000
Bypass MH (10' Dia) I 21 EA I $25,0001 $50,000
Storm Sewer I 1 I LS I $25,OOOI $25,000
Restoration of Site I 1 I LS I $55,9091 $55,909
Subtotat $590,909
10% Contingency $59,091
Total $650,000
i
1
1
Strormwater Treatment Feasibility Report
Feasibility Report
TIF District 3
OPTION 2 Treatment Devices at Movie Theater Site
Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Mobilization 1I EA $20,0001 $20,000
Vortech 2943 CIP I 2I EA I $250,OOOI $500,000
Bypass MH (10' Dia) I 2I EA $30,0001 $60,000
Restoration of Site I 1 I LS I $61,7981 $50,000
Sanitary Sewer 1 LS $30,000� $21,818
Storm Sewer 1 LS $30,000� $30,000
Subtotal $681,818
10% Contingency $68,182
Total $750,000
I Note: Easement ac uisition costs not included but are antici ated to be a roximatel
q P pP Y
$22,000.
�I
Strormwater Treatment Feasibility Report
Feasibility Report
65th Avenue System
OPTION 3 Treatment Devices on Lateral Lines
Treatment
Area item Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Mobilization 1 EA $20,000� $20,000
PC 1319 parrallel 2� EA 105,000.00� $210,000
Bypass MH (72" Dia) I 2I EA 7,000.00� $14,000
1 Restoration I 1 LS 5,000.00� $5,000
Storm Sewer 1 I LS I 8,000.001 $8,000
Area Total $237,000
VX1600 offline 1 EA 76,000.00 $76,000
Bypass MH (48" Dia) 2� EA 5,00O.00I $10,000
2 Restoration 1I LS I 5,00O.00I $5,000
Storm Sewer 1I LS I 3,000.00� $3,000
Area Total $94,000
VX1600 offline 1 EA 76,000.00 $76,000
Bypass MH (72" Dia) 2� EA 7,000.00 $14,000
3 Restoration 1 1 LS I 5,00O.00I $5,000
Storm Sewer I 1 I LS I 8,00O.00I $8,000
Area Total $103,000
VX1600 offline 1 EA 76,000.00� $76,000
Bypass MH (72" Dia) 2� EA 7,000.00� $14,000
4 Restoration 1 LS 5,000.00� $5,000
Storm Sewer 1 I LS I 8,00O.00I $8,000
Area Total $103,000
1421 CIP online 1 EA 95,000.00� $95,000
5 Restoration I 1) LS I 5,000.001 $5,000
Storm Sewer 1 LS 3,000:00� $3,000
Area Total $103,000
Subtotal $660,000
10% Contingency $66,000
Total $726,000
i
1
Appendiac C
Benefited Areas of the TIF District 3 Regional
Treatment System Option 2(submitted to WMWMC)
Regiona/ Stormwater Treatment Feasibility Report
TIF District 3
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 1143-OS
WSB
Infrastructure 1 En ineerin 1 Plannin 1 Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Associates, Inc. 9 g g
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
June 4, 2007
Te1:763-541-4800
Fax:763-541-1700
West Mississippi Watershed Management Commission
c/o Ed Matthiesen
Wenck Associates
1800 Pioneer Creek Center
P.O. Box 428
Maple Plain, MN 55359
1 Re: TIF District 3 Regional Stormwater Treatment System
WSB Project No. 1143-OS
Dear Mr. Matthiesen:
Thank you for taking the time to meet with City of Brooklyn Center (City) and WSB staff to discuss
regional stormwater treatment improvements that the City is currently planning. As discussed at
these meetings, the City is proposing to construct an underground stormwater treatment system on
the Regal Theater Site located at the northwest quadrant of the Highway 252 I— 694 interchange.
This treatment device will service a contributing drainage area of 493 acres; see attached Figure 2
for a map of the contributing drainage area.
The attached report entitled, "Benefited Areas of the TIF District 3 Regional Treatment System"
outlines the design of the proposed system and the extent that the treatment system will satisfy the
West Mississippi Watershed Management Commission's (WMWMC) rules for future development/
redevelopment within the City. The City requests that WMWMC approve the proposed treatment
system as presented in the report at its upcoming meeting on June 14.
If you have any comments or questions, please contact me at 763-287-7176.
I�
Thank you for your time and attention.
WSB Associates, Inc.
1
Paul M. Hudalla, PE
Attachment
lh
Minneapolis 1 St. Cloud
EqUe� �ppOftU�lty EfTl�l)(�y�,�f3_OSIAdminlDocslWatershedSubminallLTR-edmattheisen-053007.doc
BENEFITTED AREAS OF THE TIF DISTRICT 3
REGIONAL STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
Pre ared For
P
City of Brooklyn Center
June 4, 2007
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
i�`7� �/��;42�''�
Paul M. Hudalla, PE Date
Lic No. 42803
S
T�d E. Hubmer, PE Date
Lic No. 24043
Benefited Areas of the TIF District 3 Regionai Stormwater Treatment System
City of Brooklyn Center, MN
WSB Project No. 1143-05
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1
IL FEASIBILITY STUDY SUMMARY 2
III. DESIGN PARAMETERS TREATMENT SYSTEM EFFICIENCY 3
IV. WATER QUALITY TREATMENT EQUIVALENTS 4
V. LOCATIONS THAT WILL UTILIZE THE PROPOSED SYSTEM TO MEET THE
WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS OF THE WATERSHED 5
List of Tables
Table 1 NURP 50 Total Suspended Solids Distribution
List of Fi�ures
Figure 2 TIF District 3 Regional Stormwater Treatment System Option 2
Figure 4 WMWMC Water Quality Treatment Credits Due to Construction of TIF District 3
Regional Stormwater Treatment System Option 2
Appendix A Contech Technical Documentation
Benefited Areas of the TIF District 3 Regionai Stormwater Treatment System
City of Brookiyn Center, MN
WSB Project No. 1143-05
I. INTRODUCTION
This document has been prepared to present the technical information associated with
construction of a proposed regional stormwater treatment system to service TIF District 3
in Brooklyn Center, MN. A summary of the Feasibility Study and the recommended
system is provided as well as documentation supporting the design parameters and the
efficiency of the treatment system. The document also outlines the extent that this
treatment system will satisfy the West Mississippi Watershed Management
Commission's (WMWMC) rules for future development/redevelopment that is
anticipated to occur within the watershed tributary to the proposed improvement. Finally,
the document outlines areas within the City where water quality requirements of the
WMWMC will be met by the proposed treatment system.
1
Benefited Areas of the TIF District 3 Regional Stormwater Treatment System
City of Brooklyn Center, MN
WSB Project No. 1143-05 Page 1
1
II. TIF DISTRICT 3 REGIONAL STORMWATER TREATMENT FEASIBILITY
STUDY SUMMARY
Over the next several years, the City of Brooklyn Center is planning to redevelop and to
reconstruct streets and utilities within a significant portion of the region serviced by the
65 Avenue stormwater system. Stormwater runoff generated in this region currently
receives little or no stormwater treatment prior to being discharged into to the Mississippi
River. The anticipated redevelopment and improvement projects provide opportunity to
address, plan, and implement stormwater quality improvements for the region.
A feasibility study for stormwater treatment of this watershed has been prepared by WSB
for the City of Brooklyn Center. This study identified several options for stormwater
treatment. Of these options, an underground treatment system appears to be the best
option from a cost and constructability standpoint for regional treatment and is
recommended to be constructed m fa11 of 2007.
The system is proposed to be located just to the east of 65 and Camden Avenues in the
Regal Movie Theater parking lot. At this location the device is able to treat a
contributing area of 493 acres. The trunk storm sewer at this location is a 72-inch pipe
that is approximately 18 feet below ground. This treatment option removes total
suspended solids from a significant runoff area and would require only a single,
convenient location for maintenance.
The report concludes that construction of the treatment system is necessary, and cost
effective from an engineering standpoint:
Benefited Areas of the TIF District 3 Regional Stormwater Treatment System
City of Brooklyn Center, MN
WSB Project No. 1143-05 Page 2
III. DESIGN PARAMETERS TREATMENT SYSTEM EFFICIENCY
Several design paxameters were considered to determine the appropriate size and
associated efficiency of the proposed treatment system. Parameters considered include
the following items:
Drainage Area Treated
The drainage area treated by the proposed system is 493 acres. This area was
determined by WSB using sewershed delineations provided by the City.
Treatment Flow Rate
The treatment flow rate for the proposed system is 85 cubic feet per second. The
i treatment flow rate is defined as the maximum flow rate in which the treatment
system is designed to remove TSS from flows. This rate has been determined
based on runoff from impervious areas for a one-inch (1.0), 24-hour storm event.
Based on conversations with the Minnesota Climatology office and available
rainfall data, this event accounts for more than 90% of all rainfall events that
occur annually. A calculated curve number of 80, an estimated 80-minute time of
concentration, and NRCS hydrology methods were used to determine the flow
rate.
Bypass Flow Rate
The bypass flow rate for the proposed system is 372 cubic feet per second. The
bypass flow rate is defined as the maximum flow rate that the system can convey
without resuspending TSS that has been retained in the system. The rate was
determined assuming full-flow conditions of the existing storm sewer main
upstream of the proposed system (72-inch pipe, 0.77% slope, Manning's
roughness coefficient of 0.013).
TSS Particle Distribution
TSS particle distribution used to design the proposed system is a 50 micron
gradation as shown in Appendix A. This particle distribution closely resembles
the NURP 50 particle distribution that has been provided by Wenck Associates as
indicated in Table 1. The 50 micron gradation only considers particles under 75
microns. Therefore, the 50 micron gradation does not have the larger particles
included in the NURP 50 particle distribution and will provide a more
conservative design than recommended by the WMWMC's Engineer.
The treatment system is proposed to consist of two 29 by 43 foot treatment structures
placed in parallel. A bypass structure is also proposed to divert treatment flow rates into
the treatment devices and to allow higher flow rates to bypass the treatment devices.
Based on this proposed design and the previously discussed design parameters, the
treatment device manufacturer has determined that the proposed system is able to remove
69% of the TSS flowing through the trunk storm sewer line. See Appendix A for design
and testing documents provided by the manufacturer of the system.
Benefited Areas of the TIF District 3 Regional Stormwater Treatment System
City of Brooklyn Center, MN
WSB Project No. 1143-05 Page 3
IV. WATER QUALITY TREATMENT EQUIVALENTS
The Watershed has established rules that re uire develo ments to rovide stormwater
q P P
treatment ponds that meet the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards for
stormwater treatment. Since these rules do not specify requirements for underground
treatment systems such as the one proposed, the City and WMWMC staff have agreed
that equivalency of the proposed treatment devices compared to the WMWMC's rules for
ponding should be determined through a comparison of treatment removal efficiencies
that can be expected from the systems.
WSB has prepared a water quality treatment equivalency analysis to determine the extent
that the proposed treatment system will satisfy the WMWMC's rules for development
and redevelopment proposed to occur in the City. The analysis is outlined below in a
step-by-step fashion:
Step 1: Determine TSS Removal Efficiency of NURP Ponds (Required by
WMWMC)
85% TSS Removal assumed for NURP ponds
This analysis applies to the removal efficiency to 100% storm event
Over subject area (493 acres), removes TSS runoff from 419 acres (493 x 85% x
100%)
Ste 2: Determine TS R m val tem
p S e o Efficiency for Proposed Treatment Sys
69% TSS Removal per manufacturer's calculations
Applies to greater than 90% of rainfall events
Treatment structure sized to service entire 493 acres
Over subject area (493 acres), removes sediment runoff from 306 acres (493 x
69% x 90%)
Step 3: Compare Removal Efficiencies of NURP Ponds vs. Proposed Treatment
System
Based on TSS removal ratio between proposed treatment system and NURP
ponds over the subject area (as determined in Steps 1 and 2)
Treatment Ratio 306 acres 419 acres 73%
I� Proposed treatment system is 73% as effective as NURP Ponds for TSS removal
Step 4: Determine Water Quality Treatment Equivalents for Proposed System
Applies the Results of Step 3 to the entire subject area
Proposed treatment system will provide TSS removal equivalent to NURP
treatment for 360 acres of the 493 acre, subject area (73% x 493 acres)
1
Based on the results of this analysis, the treatment system is proposed to meet the
WMWMC's water quality requirements for 360 acres of the 493-acre area that drains to
i the treatment device.
1
Benefited Areas of the TIF District 3 Regional Stormwater Treatment System
City of Brooklyn Center, MN
WSB Project No. 1143-05 Page 4
V. LOCATIONS THAT WILL UTILIZE THE PROPOSED SYSTEM TO MEET
THE WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS OF THE WMWMC
Based on the results of the analysis outlined above, the proposed treatment system will
meet water quality requirements of the Watershed for 360 acres of the 493-acre area that
drains to the treatment device. The City has identified 360 acres of properties that will
utilize the proposed treatment system for future development redevelopment. A map of
the properties can be found on Figure 4. It is proposed that water quality requirements of
the Watershed will be met for all of these properties through construction of the proposed
treatment syst�m.
The ma on Fi ure 4 will be u dated as necess to add or remove arcels that will
P g p �'Y P
meet the WMWMC's requirements for water quality. The m�imum acreage treated by
the treatment device as indicated on the mapping shall not exceed 360 acres. Any
amendments to the map will be presented to the WMWMC for approval. If WMWMC
rules are revised with more stringent water quality requirements, another equivalent
analysis will be performed and the map will be revised. The WMWMC will have the
opportunity to review and approve the inap as amendments become necessary.
i
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
Bene�ted Areas of the TIF District 3 Regional Stormwater Treatment System
City of Brooklyn Center, MN
WSB Project No. 1143-05 Page 5
1
1
FIGURES
i
:1
1
Benefited Areas of the TIF District 3 Regional Stormwater Treatment System
City of Brooklyn Center, MN
WSB Project No. 1143-05
TABLES
Benefited Areas of the TIF District 3 Regional Stormwater Treatment System
City of Brooklyn Center, MN
WSB Project No.1143-05
I
Table 1
NURP 50 Total Suspended Solids
Particle Distribution
x t r�
t.{,Perce�it T��,�� �P ��a�ticFe{5rz�� rnrerans 4 �����w�,��
20% 5- 8
20% 8- 30
20% 30 75
40% 75 or greater
(Based on information provided by Wenck Associates,
derived from NURP 50 distribution)
i
�1
�1
1
1
a
Benefited Areas of the TIF District 3 Regional Stormwater Treatment System
City of Brooklyn Center, MN
WSB Project No. 1143-05
APPENDIX A
Contech Technical Documentation
Benefited Areas of the TIF District 3 Regional Stormwater Treatment System
I, City of Brooklyn Center, MN
WSB Project No. 1143-05
Vortechs'"' Stormwater Treatmenf Sysfems
FLOW CALCULATIONS
Regai Theater Site
Brooklyn Center
srcr�snwa� Modet 2943CIP
S�.un°�vs,. System 1 of 2 2943 CIP 50 micron
Vortechs Orifice Vortechs Weir �pass Weir
Cd 0.56 Cd 3.33 Cd 3.3
A(ft 5.90 Weir Crest Length (ft) 29 Weir Crest Length (ft) 3.5
Crest Elevation (ft} 814.92 Crest Elevation (ft) 819.68 Crest Elevation {i#) 818.34
Head Elevation Orifice Flow I Weir Flow I BYpass Flow Total Flow
(ft) {ft) (cfs) (cfs} (cfs) (cfs)
o.00 814.92 o.00 o.00 o.00 o.00
0.40 815.32 2.85 0.00 0.00 2.85
0.80 815.72 8.05 0.00 I 0.00 8.05
1.20 816.12 14.80 0.00 0.00 14.80
1.60 816.52 23.86 0.00 0.00 23.86
2.00 816.92 29.16 0.00 0.00 29.16
2.40 I 817.32 33.64 0.00 0.00 33.64
2.80 817.72 1 37.59 0.00 0.00 37.59
3.20 818.12 41.16 0.00 0.00 41.16
3.42 818.34 42.97 0.00 0.00 42.97
3.60 I 818.52 I 44.44 I 0.00 I 0.90 I 45.35
4.00 818.92 I 47.50 0.00 5.14 52.64
4.40 819.32 I 50.37 I 0.00 I 11.26 61.63
4.80 819.72 53.09 0.96 I 18J9 72.84
5.20 820.12 I 55.68 1 28.80 27.50 111.97
5.69 820.61 58.70 87.69 39.62 186.00
Please note that the above represent the flow caiculations for one treatment unit, the system in parallel wouid be
identical. The total peak flow for both units is 372 cfs, the total extemal weir length wouid be 7 ft.
Calculated by: DMP 5/24l2007 IlChecked by: I
Vortechs System
821.0 S�S3!�e Di�.�e Curve
I
a2o.o I 1 I
_..---�----•-�-------1-i ---•------i-----. WeirCre�t
819.0 X I I
I� 'I BYPass C�est
818.0 I I I I
W 81 T.0
816.0 /f I I I--
815.0.� I- Oriftc�Cr���
8,4.� -r- -I= -I- -1
I
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0 200.0
Discharge (cfs)
f:\data\vortechn\projects127552 Option 2 2943- 50 micron AP 512512007
Yortechs Stormwater Treatmenf Systems
VORTECHS SYSTEM NET ANNUAL SEDIMENT LOAD REDUCTION EFFICIENCY
Regal Theater Site
Brooklyn Cente
s�r�vaw�� Mode119000
s�����- System 1 of 2 2943 CIP 50 micron
Design Ratio� f244.5 acresl x 0.6 x(449 qpm/cfsl 99 7
(660.5 s fl
Bypass occurs at an elevation of 818.3' (at approximately 29 gpm/sfl
RainfaN Intensitv Operatinq Rate Total Rainfali Rmvl. Effcv Rel. Effcv
'7hr gpmisf Votume S%►
0.02 I 2•Q I 11.6% 98.0% 11.4%
0.04 I 4A 10.1% 95.8% I 9J%
0.06 I 6A 8.1% 92.6% I 7.5%
0.08 I 8A 6.7% N 90.0% 6.0%
0.10 10A 6.8% N 87.1% 5.9%
0.12 12A 4.4% 84.0% 3.7%
0.14 I 14.0 4.2% 80.3% 3.4%
0.16 I 16.0 4.5% N 77.4% 3.5%
0.18 I 17.9 3.8% 74.0% I 2.8%
0.20 I 19.9 N 4.3% N 70.9% I 3.1 °!o
0.25 I 24.9 6.1 N 64.2% 3.9%
0.30 I 30.4 I 4.1 M 57.1 2•4%
0.35 32.2 3.2% N 55.0% I 1.7%
0.40 34.3 M 1.4% N 52.4% I 0.7%
0.45 35.5 2.2% N 51.3% I 1.1
0.50 37.5 1.0% 49.2°/0 0.5%
0.75 56.1 5.7% 25.8% 1.5%
1.00 75.7 3.7% I 8.2% 0.3%
1.50 M 113.6 N 2.2% N 0.0% 0.0%
2.00 151.5 N 0.4% N 0.0% I 0.0%
N 69.1%
rain fatiing at >2"/hr or bypassing treatment 5.3%
Assumed removal efficiency for bypassed flows 0.0%
Net Annual TSS Removal Efficiency 69%
1- Design Ratio =(Total Drainage Area) x{Runoff Coefficient) x(cfs to gpm conversion) Grit Chamber Area
The Total Drainage Area and Runoff Coefficient is spec�ed by the site engineer.
The conversion factor from cfs to gpm is 449.
2- Operating Rate (gpMsf) intensity {"/hr) x Design Ratio.
3- Based on 10 years of houriy precipitation data from NCDC site 7294, St. Cloud WSO AP, Shurburne, MN
4- Based on Vortechnics laboratory verified removal of 50 micron oarticles (see Technical Bulletin #1).
Calculated by: DMP 5/24/2007 ��Checked by:
f:\datalvortechnlprojects121552 Option 2 2943- 50 micron AP 5/25l2007
i
1
o
Vortechs° System PerFormance:
Removal Efficiencies for Selected Particle Gradations
These performance curves are based on laboratory tests using a fuU scale Vortechs� model 2000. The testing protocoi
used is summarized on the foliowing page. The 150-micron curve demonsfrates the results of tests using particles that
passed through a 60-mesh sieve and were retained on a 100-mesh sieve. The 50-rnicron curve is based on tests of
particles passing through a 200-mesh sieve and retained on a 400-mesh sieve. A gradation with an average particle
size (d of 80 microns, containing particles ranging from 38-500 microns in diameter was used to represent typica!
stormwa#er solids.
Vortechs' System Removal Efficiencies for Selected Particle Gradations
�oo°ra
s—��
a
80%-'---------- --o---- �-e----------------------'r.-------------------
e
c
V 60%-' +r
1
W
j
E Q�%_'"'_._"""'_"""____"""'__'_
(Y
20%-
0% I 1 I I 1 I
0 (0} 10 (7) 20 (14) 30 (20) 40 (27} 50 (34) 60 (47 70 (48) 80 (54) 90 (61) 100 (68)
Operating Rate gpm/ft� (L/m�
50-micron typicalgredation �••••••�•••150-micron
As the graph clearly shows, CONTECH Stormwater Solutions systems maintain positive total suspended solids (TSS)
removal efficiencies over the full range of operating rates. This allows the system to effectively treat all runoff from large,
infrequent design storms, as well as runoff from more frequent low-intensity storms. CONTECH Stormwater Solutions
systems are designed to treat peak flows from 1.6 cfs (45 L/s) up to 25 cfs (710 Us) without bypassing. However,
external bypasses can be configured to convey peak flows around the system if treatment capacity is exceeded. The
CONTECH Stormwater Solutions system can be configured to direct low flows from the last chamber of the system
to polishing treatment when more stringent water quality standards are imposed. fn all configurations, high removal
e�ciencies are achieved during the lower intensity storms, which constitu#e the majority of annual rainfall volume.
CONTECH Stormwater Salutions systems are sized based on flow rate rather than volume, which allows effective
treatment of runoff from the entire storm, including high-intensity flows. This design basis addresses the deficiencies
of conventional volume-based BMPs, which capture the first half or whole inch of runoff but may bypass prematurely,
allow resuspension of previously captured pollutants, and/or wash out at higher flow rates. For more information about
o Technical Bulletin No. 3
the CONTECH Stormwater Solutions Inc. sizing methodology, please refer t
IUI. i U100':i C�'tiF.GN 9'cr�..ya:m :WU+�a�a 21N»
CONTECH Stormwater Solutions Inc. www.contechstormwater.com
e
a 1°
Laboratory Quality Control Brief
The following protocol contains standard operating procedures forTotal Suspended Solids (TSS) testing in the CONTECH
Stormwater Solutions laboratory. These guidelines were followed in the creation of the preceding performance curves.
Sediment Source
Sediment samples are sorted according to ASTM Special Technical Publication 477 B, which establishes sieve analysis
procedures. U.S. Standard Sieves in a Gilson SS-15 sieve shaker are used to separate particles to the various fractions
required for our tests. To ensure uniformity of those fractions, an unsorted sample is sieved until less than 1% of that
sample passes through the sieve in one minute. All sediment recovered after a test is dried and re-sieved according to
this procedure before reuse. Unless otherwise specified, mineral sediments with a density ofi 2.65 g/cm are used.
Ftow Calibration and Regulations
Flow calibration is accomplished by calculating the head at the baffle wafl required to produce a given flow rate through
the orifice and the weir in the flow control wall. Flow is regulated by a 12-inch butterfly valve located upstream of the
CONTECH Stormwater Solutions system. In order to simulate field conditions, flow rates are changed gradually to avoid
flow surges through the system. The test flow rate is set by observing the head in the GONTECH Stormwater Solutions
system and adjusting the regulating valve accordingly. Before any samples are collected, the valve must remain fixed
for a period equal to half of the detention time so that flow equalizes throughout the system. Each test group is planned
so that flow rates increase incrementally in consecutive tests.
Sediment Metering
All sediment is injected into the inlet pipe via a'/4-inch flexible hose using a Watson Marlow 5058 peristaltic metering
1 pump. For TSS tests, a known gradation of sediment and water are combined in approximately a'/2 pound/gallon ratio
in a holding tank and homogenized by a mixing propeller powered by a'/3 horsepower motor. The mixer is activated at
least five minutes before testing commences and runs continuously throughout the test. The metering pump is activated
for a period of time equal to at least half of the detention time of the CONTECH Stormwater Solutions system at the
test flow rate, before the first influent sampte is taken. The pump must run continuously until the last effluent sample is
taken.
Sample Collection
All influent samples are taken from a six-inch gate valve focated upstream of the CONTECH Stormwater Sotutions
system. A collection bin housing a 500 mL sample container is positioned.beneath the valve. Five seconds before each
sample is taken, the valve is quickly opened and closed to eliminate any interference from particles that have settaed
in the low velocity region of the gate. This eliminates artiFicially high influent readings. The time that the influent sample
was taken is recorded and the corresponding effluent sample is collected after a period of time equal to the detention
time. Effluent grab samples are collected at the discharge pipe, by sweeping the mouth of a 500 mL bottle through the
exiting flow stream. Samples are annotated and refrigerated until they can be analyzed.
Sample Analysis
TSS samples are analyzed in the CONTECH Stormwater Solutions laboratory, following EPA method 160.2, a method
for the measurement of total non-filterable solids. Volume measurements are accurate to 0.6 mL using a 500 mL
graduated cylinder. An Acculab V 1 analytical balance with a readability of 0.001 g is used to measure mass.
tu�.�rV�ao;cllutkCN9 .ti.sau�,".Y�u
CONTECH Stormwater Solutions Inc. www.contechstormwater.com
NOTE
VORTECHSSYSTEMS
INSTALLED iN A BYPASS 43'-0" [13'106]
CONFIGURATION REQUIRE
AN UPSTREAM DIVERSION
STRUCTURETHATSHALL SEA�ANT
BE DETAILED BY THE ALUMINUM ANGLE FLANGE BAFLE WALL FLOW CONTROL
CONSULTING ENGINEER WITH NEOPRENE GASKET
WALL
WITH ELEVATION AND
WEIR WIDTH DATA
PROVIDED BY CONTECH y C .{�e,�. t f ��?_7 c J
STORMWATERSOLUTIONS ���v����F
I
ORIFICE
�ALUMINUMSWIRL I L J
CHAMBER i
s%
I i
�J 5'-0" (1524] 3'-9" [7143] 3'-9" [1143j
"'—I_'—_T_—� 29'-0"[8839]
�__J L__J Y
I
?3:
L-�--�
a �r
I WEIR A
SEAI.ANT I 1�
i I,
INIET MAY VARY. d: .1::. n 1 E 9
SEE NOTES 8� 9 r. r OUTLET�
SEE NOT
PLAN VtEW B B
RIMELEVATIONSTO
CONCRETE MATCH FINISHED GR40E
REINFORCED FOR
H520 LOADING 1 (}lsf� j 1 rRISERS BY OTHERS
r k �..i r;S,T� *:td y
JJJ I F
WEIR
B BUTYL RUBBER I I WEIR g
SEALANT� ',i AND
INLET ORIFICE OUTLET
12'-0'
[3658] �NVERT P p S ORIFICE INVFRT
rvP 1 1
:a:
6'-0' [7829] 11 G-0" ['1829] 8'A" [7829]
TVP .':r II TYP TYP
ii
T l
A
r
1:.. d k f;� I
1
SECTION A A
MINIMUM 8" [753J
COMPACTED GRAVEL
NOTES: 6. SWTS SHALL NOT BE COMPROMISED BY EFFECTS OF DOWNSTREAM TPJIWATER
1. STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (SWTS) SHALL HAVE: 7. SWfS SHALL HAVE NO INTERNAI COMPONENTS THAT OBSTRUCT MAINTENANCE ACCESS
PEAK TREATMENT CAPACITY: 147 CFS [4162.5 I/sj 8. INLET PIPE MUST BE PERPENOICUTAR TO THE STRUCTURE
SEDIMENT STORAGE: 88 CU YD [51.99 m�] 9, plpE ORIENTA710N MAY VARY; SEE SITE PLAN FOR SI2E AND LOCATION
SEDIMENT CHAMBER OIA 29' [8839) MIN 10. PURCHASER SHAIL NOT BE RESPONSIBIE FOR ASSEMBLY OP UNIT
2. SWTS SHALL BE CONTAINED IN ONE RECTANGULAR STRUCTURE 11, MANHOLE FRAMES AND PERFORATED COVERS SUPPLIED WITH SYSTEM, NOT INSTAILED
3. SWTS REMOVAL EFFICIENCY SHALL BE DOCUMENTED BASED ON PARTICLE SIZE �2, pURCHASER TO PREPARE EXCAVATION AND PROVIDE CRANE FOR OFF-LOADING AND
4. SWTS SHALL RETPJN FLOATABLES AND TRAPPED SEDIMENT UP TO AND SETTING AT TIME OF DELIVERY
INCLUDING PEAK TREATMENT CAPACITY 13. VORTECHS SYSTEMS BY CONTECH STORMWATER SOLUI'IONS; PORTLAND, OR
5. SWTS INVERTS IN AND OUT ARE TYPICALLY AT THE SAME ELEVATION (B00)548-0fi87; SCARBOROUGH, ME (877) 907-8876; LINTHICUM, MD (866) 740.3318.
PROPRIETARY INFORMATION NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
This CADD file is for the pwpose of specifying stortnwaler Uaahnent equipment W be fumished by CON7ECH Stommvater Salutlans anA may onty 6e transierteU to other documerrcs exadty as providetl
by CONTECH Srormwater SaWtlons. Tide black In(amatlon, excluding Ne CONTECH Stamwafer SolNlons logo and the Vortechs Stormwater TreaUnent System desiqnaUon and patenl number,
may he deleted if necessary. Revisions to any part of this CADD fite without prtor coordtnatlon wIN CONTECH SMrmwaler SoNtlons aha0 6e cansidered unauthorized use af proprietary IMOrmaBon.
i �°��iTi �►i..��
n STANDARD DETAIL
STORiViWATER STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SOLUTIONS.� VORTECHS� MODEL 2943CIP U.S.PATENTNa.5.759.415
contechstormwater.com DATE:12It106 SCALE: NONE FILE NAME:2943CIP I DRAWN: JBS CHECKED: NDG
i
1
i
Appendix D
WMWMC Staff Comments on TIF District 3 Regional
Treatment System Option 2
Re iona/ Sformwater Treatmenf Feasibili Re ort
9 rY P
TIF Districf 3
Brooklyn Cenfer, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 1143-05
il
The results of the Feasibility Study plus a Technical Memorandum have been submitted to tr�e
Commission for consideration. It is anticipated that the Commission will act on the submittal at their
June 14, 2007, meeting.
�i
i
i
Regional Stormwater Treatment Feasibilify Report
TIF District 3
Brook/yn Center, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 1143-05
694/100 HWY WORK SESSION
The Preferred Redevelopment Alternative
Should a development subsidy be provided?
What is the preferred marketing/redevelopment strategy?
The Context
o We could have done nothing
Hansen Fence
Tax exempt development interest
Further property value decline
Cracker Barrel closed
Olive Garden closed
Largely low paid service jobs available
No significant contribution to the TIF District
Bond Payments
District decertification expedited
TIF DISTRICT 3 District Ends 2021
o December 1, 2007 No further use of Bond Proceeds- Final scheduled
payment 2020
o May 15 2008 All projects must be complete
Land acquisition likely the only viable alternative
Benefits of Alternative Uses
o Office Showroom
Timing Immediate demand
�I
Valuation
Taxes (TIF) paid
Bond Retirement
TIF District Decertified
Jobs
Higher paid full time office/sales positions
Land Sale estimated value 3- $5 per square foot or $1.8 -$2.9
million totaL
o Cor orate Office
p
Timing Immediate to five or more years
Valuation
Taxes paid
Bond retirement
TIF District decertified expedited
Land Value $7-$8 per square foot or $4.0 -$4.7 million
dollars
Structured Parking required at $15,000 per space
0 300 spaces at 4.5 Million
Higher paid full time office and professional jobs
Subsidy Required
o Office Showroom
o Cor orate Office
p
Marketing/Redevelopment Strategy
o Completely with In house staff
Start within weeks/months
o Staff with real estate broker
Start within weeks/months
o Master developer agreement
Six months from start to complete agreement
In the interim other opportunities may be presented
6/11/2007 2:30:55 PM
i I
I 42 N. 1/2 SE. 1I4 Sec.35 1'. 119 R .21 41
z__ ���Q�_:
P
I 1 i
(i
f��= II
i
:i,! y 4 n
i
EEWAY BLVD 1 1�f I
�R i
...�e. t. p
i W 2 'C I �I� II li
v p`t'..) i S
N u7
H�.sr�r,s,aa I� i r. J;.., I C
B N D G ��C 1 l. o
Z I �a� �rai� i
S j o
I. .I�
R f1F_.(?I_fY DDN. ,„NfES�"CIR—N-- a I' I .G
H N f C ,I I I
94 i,vyaPi'rt i i y I
RIG;'ti:�+'�.2uSr;R; Pr'�.�'.K
o
m
i
I i i
i�` r� c, r� ii
F B i A
I ix� 'I
t
'E
m
r v
9Rt)OKLYN .,ENT[R
I
I IMDUSTRIAL PARK IpI
9
I i j
f
j i I;
I i u
IN '�RSTATE HWY NO t�
F L NC 1 158� J II
I
o, j
n��
��Er
T t-=—
rF-�,
35-119-21-42-xxxx 35-119-21-41-xxxx
This is nol a legally recorded mep. Il represenls 100 50 0 700 200 I
a wmpilatlon o( informellon and dala from City, BROOKI.YN Feet
County and olher sources. C6NTER �I
Prepared by �he Ciry of Brooklyn Center. e..�m� ':.a pp�� P a g e y�
Original base data supplied by Hannepin County.
I
I
z
--�I
42 N. 1/2 SE. 1/4 Sec.35 T. 119 R .21 41
P �"VQ.\ I I I)
I F k� ti i
t
I i i
i
r+�"<: `1..�
I I
i
�ti� .i :c._ �I
FREEWAV BLVU
7
I
w..r
i
S �ii i t L I II
��W I
r /F
i
I
H I. 4 NC .3<d I C
Ei r�N� G �I Nv i o
:�-z,. i
6 {�ttX^ 0 I�
I r RSTq F REF�,(..7Y rJ' C7N�. �4 .ricr�e I I I I
E y I e C7 I
r Np 9 �n
t i J`
ytiV ,i;''�ri�� �u',. �.t'.'� w
l`
i C (0
t i�i f I I
r
r..
I E
�C. Z I
Y;
I M
I ,�a (O il
I n .M1 'i
I f v z f I'�
BROOKLYN CENTER �Ii,
INDUSTRIHL PARK
j I
1 i
i
i
i i
i
I
i
IN ERSTATE
HWY NO �4
R NC Ii�itl�
.xe
��!�3�^`a.�) ..::.n..._-.i.'
I
35-119-21-42-xxxz 35-119-27-41-xxxx
This is not a le9ally recorded map. It represents
a compilation af information and data from City. BROOKLYN 100 50 0 700 200
County and other sources. CENTER� Feet
Prepared by �he City of Brooklyn Center. s.mo� Pw: P a g e: 6 3
Original base data supplied by Hennepin County.
42 N. 1/2 SE. 1/4 Sec.35 T. 119 R .21 41
BI pB.`` V
e q
I i
�a: ;J
i
���T}
F�
F:
.z�;... L
n
i
'a o
iFREEWAY BLVD
o
i Q i d�
i
A :1 y
�..r.
j 2 'C I �I
9 c
r
j,..�
u w `I
H I. 5 NC 13�a I M
1 �f r�V 0
V .r I
1 i Z �i'4Pi 1.
`.r��'i� W I II
�'�TFR F�' E A1...1 Y --.rar�ES a I C7
CS N K
q r
ywy
M„ N
N v
g4 F
i-� I l; r; Y I
.I. i
I N C1 x I 2
E e ZII
i
I r
i i j� a m
,I�
BROOKLYNCENTER
�I INGUSTRInL PARK
l I i
II
�I Ili
IN"�RSTATE HWY NO gq
I Ri NC'�fJ9�
a�
i i
I C f
1?'£?,:? r
I e
I 35-119-21-42 xxxx 35-119-21-41-xxxx
This is not a legally �recorded map. It represents
a compilation of Informalian and data from City, BROOKLYN 100 50 0 100 200
Counry and other sources. CENTER v�� d Feet
i Prepared 6y Ihe Clty of Brooklyn Cen[er. s.c�w� P•a• v P a g e V� I
Originat base data supplied hy Hennepin Counry. I�
IL—
i
Hennepin County Properiy Map Print Page 1 of 1
Hennepin County Property Map Tax Year: 2007
The da[a contained on this page is derived from a tompilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed
land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain distrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only.
Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives.
778bJ ,�i
G 56.0
0 7740 i Vb
a. �d�� s 2t �020
-.t rn i
R A 4 5595;
p ,t
r r �Y�� A
t Is.. �y 4 d
.MaN �'�.iiG..�a �.`n.,� 7 ���k. arM'�� 4
,��+r+'m" w� 4 y„
`i�� P
s' Z+ �t 'Y� ,-a�r�sr
x ;1 t
c�'��� t I
p�� d-
L t ��i. I
f
4 r��
t�t
c
67US
'b 2
��M y 1� k 1�
�'i� e a[ t
r
y
�i..�
+o- r
t f�
�s r .��'r
r,c i f �F
T
w
.,>.w�.,.
w�
F w �4�F R,� a
~s
a
ri
qeiw,,
w
_y.�,.,,,�,,,.,�� .J�,.,,c.:�.'
��w�� �.v�
'..-.,�T
�y�,..�- INtFHS7AIt 09
v�:- �w a
.:L„�,,-.
IMTERSTqTE494 t
-�fn,.,.,Y,-.� "�y.r�...,
�,.s..
x
ti. ,d
�w'I"�yNl1 �i` z
6li y '•A �,�}��i,. „�,�f,�� :,`��_,,,a.���°�'t-°-.•'£...
*�.*��.i4�.��;f��_� y t09. fl4 �!'I�tl��.°..��..�:'�
Selected Parcel Data Date Printed: 6/11/2007 12:12:28 PM
Parcel ID: 17-1i6-21-12-0008 Current Parcel Date: OS/4/2007
Owner Name: LIBERTY PROPERTY LTD PTNRSHP
Parcel Address: 6625 78TH ST W, BLOOMINGTON MN 55439
Property Type: COMMERCIAL-PREF Sale Price: ;0.00
Homestead: NON-HOMESTEAD Sale Date:
Area (sqft): 477164 Sale Code:
Area (acres): 10.95
A-T-B: BOTH
Market Total: $38,669,800.00
Tax Total: ;1,256,466.84
http://wwwl3.co.hennepin.mn.us/HCPropertyMap/Locator.aspx 6/11/2007
Hennepin County Oblique Aerials Page 1 of 1
Hennepin County Oblique Aerials
Images courtesy of: Microsoft� Virtual EarthTM 2006 Print:
y
Flight Date: April 2006
+r�f +h'
f` ��M r
��`t 4
i
�h, g Y 3. t'°s/,� y..
r
1 1 t i-- t..
a
j
F� I
1' +.ia j'
P.. -r. 1 a. 1 I� S i
d� Iv' l S
i �'�e� i 1 i.
E �i
�d I1�,ri
r t /N _b a ��I
n-� ���-s. f'M a �'�s�-_�
�:�r� 4� ..;i
�-n:' c r
i y i�
�r����
r r
z a.
e R
1 p C r�� .�rr.y
M.� Y kr a _-2�e C l
��'�le.�s i '+Fdt� �yy�, 4
�D- ro-..�,�L ,.7~. ._f r_.
.i1
a
s �y
a
�r
"a�
ti� ��:,•��c h
.w y,
r�
V i r ia E a rt aa�,r� �trd��..1�� a�
�:z x r
e
Total Visits: 186604
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
http://www 13.co.hennepin.mn.us/HCPropertyMapBirdseye.aspx?PID=1711621120008 6/ 11 /2007
Hennepin County Property Map Print Page 1 of 1
Hennepin County Property Map Tax Year: 2007
The data contained on this page is derived trom a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey pertortned by a licensed
land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and atres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only.
Hennepin County does not guarantee the acturacy of matenal herein contained and is noi responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives.
GREENYALL�/�EyDR'��..Wy.�: t :r��� •:sr�+�a+�r,�
C. �,ryL
J s..., I
t F`�
d t°m9 F #yr�'�
y 3 ��„p�
'Y k
f w l�q, ety
i�� .'y.;t ti
`.f
r J Y �'�p I
f��: ,a���
a' �.A x-
rr�
r 1 f
t�:• y F
�j�
.r Y
i
y �t�,- 'Z��P
I
Ey �I
t,' I
J ��I
i i
J �`�,1��� 1 �I
1 x �a��► S d 0 U I
r f
I
w
x i.�Yc.
i,
��i
Selected Parcel Data Date Printed: 6/11/2007 12:01:20 PM
Parcel ID: i6-116-21-24-0010 Current Parcel Date: OS/4/2007 I I
Owner Name: DUKE REALTY LTD PARTNERSHIP
Parcel Address: 5601 GREEN VALLEY DR, BLOOMINGTON MN 55437 I
Property Type: COMMERCIAL-PREF Sale Price: ;0.00
Homestead: NON-HOMESTEAD Sale Date:
Area (sqft): 311221 Sale Code:
Area (acres): 7.14 I
A-T-B: BOTH
Market Total: ;26,781,100.00 I,
Tax Total: ;854,545.78
htt ://wwwl3.co.henne in.mn.us/HCPro e Ma /Locator.as x 6/11/2007
p P P rtY P P
_Hennepin County Oblique Aerials Page 1 of 1
Hennepin County Oblique Aerials
Images courtesy of: Microsoft� Virtual Earth 2006 Print:
Flight Date: April 2006
�w,,_
r
i•
>`a,.
,5�;
ti a
�K:;
i
�e,
!I" r�,F�
4�r��t` _�d i �i.
r k
•'.i. •,li
5a�� �-r
.0
r i j 0 ti��
�j 9�►
��,�fi�
,�1,�
`y
a Y "Y'�.
j
6
S
':i
i
r
tr
r
,rw�;
_.a�a..,
K�'J;Of[ �l'�i� f
C"CUaI �c�Ct �j �tJ05 �Iicrosort Cor�rt�rat+bn �s) 1U0� ?ic*otns*�'�
Total Visits: 186595
http://www 13.co.hennepin.mn.us/HCPropertyMapBirdseye.aspx?PID=1611621240010 6/ 11 /2007
Hennepin County Property Map Print Page 1 of 1
Hennepin County Property Map Tax Year: 2007
The data contained on this pa9e is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may tontain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurafe survey performed by a licensed
land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only.
Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of materlal hereln contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its Aerivatives.
�y a ��q��` �r�
.y �i�
9TH AVE N
x
4 µY
c
s�'Y �a.
.i�
f r F h f� r
r
'f
8TH AVE N r�„ r
,i
t s"- o: f.
1
E
r..�
2
J
W
�i f Y
o0S
i
y n
3
f 3
j�- 1 �l`! a
..�P s 6TH AYE N 3
:�r„ s�.��,. ,r 2
a� :V xi`v 'r.- :3"`-
,�'1�, w
t�st"� x��` Y
7 4 ''r�,`� Q
�C, t �t d.:s�.• a
�i
Selected Parcel Data Date Printed: 6/11/2007 12:17:57 PM
Parcel ID: 36-118-22-14-0035 Current Parcel Date: OS/4/2007
Owner Name: UTAH ST RETIREMENT INVST FND
Parcel Address: 605 STATE HWY NO 169 PLYMOUTM MN 55441
Property Type: COMMERCIAL-PREF Sale Price: $23,400,000.00
Homestead: NON-HOMESTEAD Sale Date: O6/1995
Area (sqft): 271492 Sale Code: WARRANTY DEED
Area (acres): 6.23
A-T-B: ABSTRACT
Market Total: $25,207,000.00
Tax Total: $786,937.28 I I
http://wwwl3.co.hennepin.mn.us/HCPropertyMap/Locator.aspx 6/11/2007
I Hennepin County Oblique Aerials Page 1 of 1
Hennepin County Oblique Aerials
Images courtesy of: Microsoft� Virtual EarthTM 2006 �-.r� Print: j-'"
r
Flight Date: April 2006
I
w a� 1� i� I
r l
t ry L��
iF Y�i',
��F�'
�i�e y
io- `4 y
x h ��i a k r �4'^,
i-.
i �'Y :Sfy r, A,::,:� L
i r
�;�1 �t N
fi•
n_ f j
'�i
1j _�r
s
3° 4�r 1
�S�
I
t� +1. J A.,
V�
t Y+
`4 Y. B'iC�
A.�ih.� _i� Y�lti' II
.��`'�7�.''. a �g
ryrcrtisofc x r- ,st�
M1
�y�
�a a th"' r
fj ��YJ� hli�Fbs�rt C�rptN'at�i -'�-2'0�'�oaa�+t�
.v '��t� �t II
Tota� Visits: 186617
http://wwwl3.co.hennepin.mn.us/HCPropertyMapBirdseye.aspx?PID=3611822140035 6/11/2007
r
Freeway Boulevard Redevelopment Area
Lot Area Frozen 2007 Assessed Market Values
Value (94) Total Bldg. Land
Days Inn 6.82 acres $2.175 M $3.800 M 1.425 M 2.375
Cracker Barrel 4.23 acres $0.975 M $1.816 M 0.566 M 1.250
Olive Garden 2.35 acres 1.183 $1.000 M 0.263 m 0.736
Totals 13.40 acres $4.333 M $6.616 M 2.254 4.361
13.4 acres Office Showroom Warehouse $7.4M
$7.4 4.333 =$3.067M times 2% _$61,134 tax capacity times 1.3236 tax rate =$81,189
Assumption: 2008 construction 20101 annual tax increment
2010 2020 11 years x$81,189 =$893,086 increment
1994 2007 Difference 2010 Difference
Frozen Rate (94-2007) Redeveloped (2007-2010)
Market Value $4.333M $6.616M 2.283 $7.4M 0.784
Tax Capacity $86,660 $132,320 45,660 $148,000 $15,680
City Tax Portion $40,673 $62,103 21,430 69,462 7,359
Co. Tax Portion $34,347 $52,638 18,291 58,875 6,237
School Tax Portion $35,544 $54,272 $18,728 60.703 6,431
State Ed. Tax $43,330 $66,160 $22,830 74,000 7,840
Scenario #2
2007 base value $6.616M -$7.4M =$0.784M times 2% 15,680 tax capacity times 1.3236 =$20,754
2008-2020 13 years x $20,754 $269,802
Freeway Boulevard Redevelopment Options
13.4 acres 350,000 sq.ft. Multi-Tennant Office $17M
$17 4.333 =$12.667M times 2% _$253,340 tax capacity times 1.3236 tax rate =$335,320
Assumption: 2009 construction 2011 1 annual tax increment
2011- 2020 9 years x$335,320 =$3,017,880 increment
1994 2007 Difference 2011 Difference
Frozen Rate (94 to 2007) Redeveloped (2007-2011)
Market Value $4.333M $6.616M $2.283M $17.OM $10.384M
Tax Capacity $86,660 $132,320 $45,660 $340,000 $207,680
City Tax Portion $40,673 $62,103 $21,430 $159,575 97,472
Co. Tax Portion $34,347 $52,638 $97,472 $135,255 82,617
School Tax Portion $35,544 $54,272 $18,728 $139,454 85,182
State Ed. Tax $43,330 $66,160 $22,830 $170,000 $103,840
Scenario #2
2007 base value $6.616M -$17.0 =$10.384M times 2% =207,680 tax capacity times 1.3236 =$274,885
2011-2020 9 years x$274,885 2,473,967
13.4 acres 250,000 sq.ft. Corporate Office $25 M
$25 4.333 =$20.667M times 2% _$413,340 tax capacity times 1.3236 tax rate =$547,096
Assumption: 2009 construction 2011 1 annual tax increment
2011— 2020 9 years x$547,096 =$4,923,864 increment
1994 2007 Difference 2011 Difference
Frozen Rate (94-20Q7) Redeveloped (2007-2011)
Market Value $4.333M $6.616M $2.283M $25.OM $18.384M
Tax Capacity $86,660 $132,320 45,660 $500,000 $367,680
City Tax Portion $40,673 62,103 21,420 $234,670 $172,567
Co. Tax Portion $34,347 52,638 18,291 $198,905 $146,267
School Tax Portion 35 544 54 272 18 928 205 080 $150 808
State Ed. Tax $43,330 66,160 $22,830 $250,000 $183,840
Scenario #2
I
2007 base value $6.616M -$25M =$18.384M times 2% 367,680 tax capacity times 1.3236 =$486,661
I
20Z1-2020 9 years x $486,661= $4,379,949
t
13.4 acres 350,000 sq.ft. Corporate Office $35 M
$35 4.333 =$31.667M times 2% _$633,340 tax capacity times 1.3236 tax rate =$838,288
Assumption: 2009 construction 2011 1 annual tax increment
2011— 2020 9 years x$838,288 =$7,544592 increment
1994 2007 Difference 2011 Difference
Frozen Rate (94-2007} Redeveloped (2007-2011)
Market Value $4.333M $6.616M $2.283 $35.OM $28.384M
132 320 74 340 700 000 $567 680
Tax Ca acit 86 660
p Y
City Tax Portion $40,673 $62,103 $21,430 $328,538 $266,435
Co. Tax Portion $34,347 $52,638 $18,291 $278,467 $225,829
School Tax Portion $35,544 $54,272 $18,728 $287,112 $232,840
State Ed. Tax $43,330 $66,160 $22,830 $350,000 $283,840
Scenario #2
2007 base value $6.616M -$35M =$28.384M times 2% 567,680 tax capacity times 1.3236 =$751,381
2011-2020 9 years x$751,381 6,762,4�1