Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006 02-27 CCP Regular Session Public Copy AGENDA CITY COUNCIL STLTDY SESSION February 27, 20U6 6:00 P.M. City Council Chambers 1. City Council Discussion of Agenda Items and Questions 2. Discussion of Work Session Agenda Items as Time Permits 3. Miscellaneous 4. Adjourn I i k i E CITY COUNCIL MEETING City of Brooklyn Center February 27, 2006 AGENDA 1. Informal Open Forum With City Council 6:45 p.m. —provides an opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda. Open Forum will be limited to 15 minutes, it is not televised, and it may not be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with citizens. Questions from the Council will be for clarification only. Open Forum will not be used as a time for problem solving or reacting to the comments made but, rather, for hearing the citizen for informational purposes only. 2. Invocation 7 p.m. 3. Call to Order Regular Business Meeting —The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. 4. Roll Call 5. Pledge of Allegiance 6. Council Report 7. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda —The following items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at the end of Council Consideration Items. a. Approval of Minutes —Councilmembers not present at meetings will be recorded as abstaining from the vote on the minutes. 1. J,anuary 9, 2006 Regular Session 2. February 13, 2006 Regular Session 3. February 13, 2006 Study Session 4. February 13, 2006 Work Session b. Licenses c. Resolution Approving Change Order No. 3, Improvement Project No. 2004-14, Contract 2004-H, Shingle Creek Parkway and Suminit Drive Improvements CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- February 27, 2006 d. Resolution Selecting the No Waiver Option for Statutory Tort Liability 8. Public Hearing 1. Public Hearings on Improvement Project Nos. 2006-01, 02, 03 and 04, Contract 2006-A, Centerbook Area Neighborhood Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements a. Resolution Ordering Improvements and Authorizing Development of Plans and Specifications for Improvement Project Nos. 2006-01, 02, 03 and 04, Contract 2006-A, Centerbrook Area Neighborhood Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements b. Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Improvement Project Nos. 2006-01 and 2006-02, Contract 2006-A, Centerbrook Area Neighborhood Street and Storm Drainage Improvements to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls •Requested Council Action: —0pen the Public Hearing. —Take public input. —Close the Public Hearing. —Motion to adopt resolutions. 9. Planning Commission Item l. Planning Commission Application No. 2Q06-001 Submitted by Jim LaValle of SP Brooklyn Center, LLC. Request for a Planned Unit Development Amendment and development plan approval for a 10,000 sq. ft. multi tenant retail building at 615 66�' Avenue North. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this application at its February 16, 2006, meeting. a. Resolution Regarding Disposition of Planning Commission Application No. 2006-01 Submitted by Jim LaValle of SP Brooklyn Center, LLC. •Requested Council Action: —Motion to adopt resolution. 10. Presentation a. Resolution Accepting Report From Opportunity Site Task Force, Thanking Opportunity Site Task Force for Its Work, and Directing Implementation Efforts •Requested Council Action: —Motion to adopt resolution. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- February 27, 2006 11. Council Consideration Items a. Constitutional Dedication of the Motor Vehicle Sales Tax •Requested Council Action: —Request of Association of Metropolitan Municipalities to adopt resolution of support. b. Resolution Expressing Recognition and Appreciation for the Dedicated Public Service of Jeanie Mueller •Requested Council Action: —Motion to adopt resolution. c. Resolution Expressing Appreciation to Mr. Robert Shadduck and Jerry's •Requested Council Action: —Motion to adopt resolution. d. Set Date and Time of Joint Work Session With Financial Commission for Monday, May 15, 2006, at 6:30 p.m. •Requested Council Action: —Motion to set date and time of joint Work Session with Financial Commission far Monday, May 15, 2006, at 6:30 p.m. in CounciUCommission Conference Room, City Hall. e. Resolution on Stadium Vote •Requested Council Action: —Motion to adopt resolution. 12. Adjournment City Council Agenda Item No. 7a .S 0 a �y COUNCIL MEMBER CARMODY: CITY COUNCIL RETREAT Councilmember Carmody stated she is not interested in having a retreat. Mayor Kragness stated a retreat is not necessary this spring. She stated the previaus retreats have not been beneficiai to the City Council. Councilmember Lasman stated the retreats aze valuable only if those attending want to be presenL Councilmember O'Connor stated she does not mind if there is no retreat this spring. Councilmember Niesen stated she does not mind if there is no retreat, however believes that there are things that could be improved and the retreats are beneficiai. v COUNCTL MEMBER O'CONNOR: REVIEW OF 69 BROOKLYN BLVD. LIQUOIt STORE RESULTS Councilmember O'Connor stated she would ]ike to review the total revenue from both liquor stores. She stated the full administrative service fee was not transfened. ^p+ j-� -$�1-� She suggested discussing this at the joint meeting with the Financial Comrnission in March. She stated it might be a good time to sell both liquor stores. Mayor Kragness asked Councilmember O' Connor where the profits gained from the liquar stores, totaling over $140,000 would come from. Councilmember O'Connor responded by selling the liguor stores, a reduction in-a�rrirristrat�e�-could take placs. s Councilmember Niesen stated the matter could be discussed at the joint meeting with the Financial Commission in March. Councilrnembez Carmody stated concern with the present lease agreement for the facilities. Mr. McCauley responded if the municipal liquor was abolished, the lease at the Cub Foods site could be terminated. Mayor Kragness responded the citizens voted for municipal liquors and the City would lose money if they were to close. Councilmember 0'Connar suggested that the matter be discussed at the March 6, 2006, Work Session. Cauncilmember Niesen agreed with Councilmember O'Connor. Mayor Kragness and Councilmembers Carmody, Lasman, and Niesen disagreed that the matter should be discussed at the March 6, 2006, Work Sessi4n 2/13�06 3 DRAFT Y' S G ��'`e-c,'���°'� TOBACCO RELATED PRODUCT Brooklyn BP, Inc 6044 Brooklyn Boulevard Brooklyn Center Municipal #1 S625 Xe�es Avenue North Brooklyn Center Municipal #2 6930 Brooklyn Boulevard, Suite 2 7c. APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE SUBMITTED BY ST. ALPHONSUS PARISH, 7025 HALIFAX AVENUE NQRTH, FO�,t AN EVENT TO BE HELD MARCH 17, 2006 7d. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-11 CALLING FOR A HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DISEASED TREE REMOVAL COSTS, DELINQUENT WEED REMOVAL COSTS, AND DELINQUENT PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICE ACCOUNTS 7e. RESOLUTION NO. 2006- 12 ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N4S. 2006-05, 06, 07 AND 08, AUMBOLDT AVENUE AND EARLE BROWN DRIVE STREET, STORM DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ?f. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-13 DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2006-05, CONTRACT 2006-B, HUMBOLDT AVENUE AND EARLE BROWN DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS 7g. RESULUTION NO. 200b-14 ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING A CONTRACT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2005-18, CONTRA.CT 2005-I, CENTRAL PARK BALLFTELD LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS 7h. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-15 APPROVING FINAL PI�.�AT FOR INTERCFiANGE ADDITION 7i. SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE REDUCTTON ESTATES OF RIVERWOOD C Motion passe ha h iy��� y� 8. PUBLIC HEARING �rre. c�- v��f� '�-°`�e- 2I13/06 -4- DRAFT Page l of 1 Michael McCauley From: Diane Niesen Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 11�32 PM To: Michael McCauley Subject: Proposed changes to Minutes 2/13/06 C Item 9d. Under paragraph, Councilmember Niesen stated the following reasons she does not support the change to the City Code: Significant change with unproved need City stock of post VW1fll homes are completely built out and allowed for a wide configuration of driveways from small to large/Iong Only person who spoke at the Planning Commission's public hearing was the author of the ordinance change: Mr. Willis Dahn. Has not received one complaint regarding number of cars in driveways Planning Commission Minutes do not contain arguments or facts as to why the number of cars in driveways should be limited to six and those who voted in favor did not list reasons Drove around several neighborhood communities and did not see an abuse of existing law Ordinance change involves more than just cars, also involves trailers, and since people were allowed to pave their yards in response to existing laws it doesn't seem fair or reasonable at this point to arbitrarily choose a number of vehicles that people may have, especially because no parking on City streets is allowed from 2- S:OOa.m. Ifa family has six licensed drivers, and has guests stay over, they would be in violation of the law and the result would be to ticket people for having vehicles on their own paved driveways 2/27/2006 Page 1 of 1 Michael McCauley From: Ka#hleen Carmody Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 10:2Z PM To: Michael McCauley Subject: January minutes Could you please forward this to all Council Members at the meeting on AAonday (2/27/06)? Regarding the minutes from January, I believe the minutes written by Council Member Niesen are too long and belabor the discussion too rnuch. l. do not believe i# is appropriate to have these added as a substitute in place o� the ptevious minutes. I do believe, however, that the prior minutes written by the Deputy City Clerk had one mistake or omission in them. In the final sentence, "and the savings on the airfare" should either be added or the last sentence should be deleted. That is the onl chan e I would su est. Y 9 99 Also, as an FYI: Wells Fargo Bank paid the $500 that they had promised last year to the Ear►e Brown Days Committee. Cathy Ballot, a EBD board member, stated that Wells Fargo has a new manager and she is hopeful that they will fulfill all the future community commitments that they make. Could we add a very brief discussion of the Visit Minneapolis North issue to the work session agenda? I believe that since Myrna is on the board, she should be aware of it. I wi11 bring the letter with me. Kathleen 2/27/2006 Office of the City Clerk City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community MEMORANDUM TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk DATE: February 23, 2006 SUBJECT: Requested Changes to Minutes Following is a compilation of all the requested changes to the January 9, 2006, Regular Session City Counci] minutes (c*r'�R indicates matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter): Councilmember Mary O'Connor Page 8 (Item llb), lstparagraph Councilmember O'Connor stated she would like to postpone the commission appointments until January 31, 2006, so that other ����*�a parties can apply. Page 9(Item l ld), 2nd paragraph Councilmember O'Connor asked if Councilmember Lasman had been the �g Mayor pro tem in the past and suggested someone new be given a chance. Councilmember Kathleen Carmody Page 10 (Item 1lg), 3rd paragraph Councilmember Carmody stated if the City Council had decided to develop a training library prior to Councilmember Niesen's attendance at the conference, she would have been in favor of reimbursement. Councilmember Kay Lasman Page 6(Item 1 Oa), 1 st paragrapl� Councilmember Lasman inquired of the accreditation of the Association for Biblical Higher Education and if it were a State a�,nroved organization. Page 10 (Item 11 g), 4th paragraph Councilmemt�er Lasman stated agreement with Mayor Kragness and Councilmember Carmody and added that a library of information from seminars would be a waste of money in the long run due to changes in�s le�islation that make infornlation current for only a short time. 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Reereation and Community Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (�63) 569-3434 FAX (763) 569-3494 www. cityofbrooklyncenter.org Memorandum to City Manager Page 2 February 23, 2006 Councilmember Diane Niesen (from memo dated 02/17/06) Page 10 (Item 11 g),� 1 st paragraph Remove 1 st paragraph and replace with the following paragraph: Councilmember Niesen stated she attended the National Leaeue of Cities (NLCI annual Con�ress of Cities (CoCI in Charlotte, NC. She attended a full-dav Leadershin Trainin� Institute (LTII class l $1601 and two half-dav classes a, l 00l for a total of 3 classes costin� $360. She noted that the avera�e cost to send councilmembers to the CoC is around $2,500 includin� transbortation. hotels. meals and conferenee re�istration. She said each vear LTI offers about 20 classes for a total cost of about $2,300, and the NLC nrovides around 30 seminars covered bv the cost of re�istration (several hundred dollarsl. She said CD-ROMs of all LTI sessions and NLC seminars were available for nurchase and contained the oral bresentations and PowerPoint slides. She noted that nrior to 2004, oral presentations onlv were offered on cassette tabes. She said onlv neonle attendin� the CoCs were allowed to nurchase the CDs at a discounted nrice and that she could buv both the 2005 and 2004 for $396. She shared that nost-conference, the 2005 CD alone cost $500. She said her eoal was to have council start buildine an in-house leadershib trainine and education librarv to be shared bv current councilmembers. Citv staff, commission volunteers and future Citv leaders. She said she had called and snoken with the Citv Manaeer from the conference and asked about reimbursement if she purchased the CDs from her nersonal charee card. She said the Citv Manager told her he recalled a vote taken once to reimburse a councilmember for some books nurchased at a seminar and the then Council had voted no but had he not been aware of that, he said his answer would be different. She exblained th�t because the Citv Mana�er sounded favorable on this issue. she made the purchase from her nersonal credit card and is seekin� reimbursement so the Citv can take possession of the CDs. Page 11 (Item 11 g), 1 st paragraph Remove 1 st paragraph and replace with the following two paragraphs: Councilmember Niesen said that she felt it would be the citizens, Citv and future leaders who will lose out and exnlained she had called the Citv Mana�er from the conference and learned there was no Council nolicv on the Citv acauirin� education and trainin� materials. and that in her aninion all members have at one time or another acted alone as individual councilmembers. She ar�ued that the concent of a librarv. like the nublic librarv. is to have information that is used cun and then built unon as thin�s chan�e. She said that considerin� the low airfare sl�e was able to secure. nlus savin�s in transbortation and some food costs, the $396 cost af the CD-ROMs was covered. She a�ain noted her eoal to have in-house leadershin trainin� materials for Citv staff. councilmembers, neonle runnin� for office and Citv commission members. She noted some councilmembers thousht $396 was a lot of monev to st�end without nre-anbrovals but a�ain ar�ued the estimated $4,500 value vs. the cost for what she thou�ht were valuable and nrofessional education and trainin� on a wide varietv of nublic issues. Mavor Kraeness told Councilmember Niesen she could use the CD-ROMs to educate herself and other councilmembers at future meetines. She didn't feel this was done correctiv and so would not suunort reimbursement. MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION JANUARY 9, 2006 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM. The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum and was called to order by Mayor Myrna Kragness at 6:45 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Myrna Kragness and Councilmembers Kathleen Carmody, Kay Lasman, Diane Niesen, and Mary O'Connor. Also present were City Manager Michael McCauley, Assistant City Manager/Director of Operations Curt Boganey, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Deputy City Clerk Camille Yungerberg. Mayor Kragness opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum. No one wished to address the Council. Councilmernber Carmody moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to close the Informal Open Forum at 6:46 p.m. 2. INVOCATION Mayor Kragness offered a prayer for the Invocation. 3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session and was called to arder by Mayor Myrna Kragness at 7:00 p.m. 4. ROLL CALL Mayor Myrna Kragness and Councilmembers Kathleen Carmody, Kay Lasman, Diane Niesen, and Mary O'Connor. Also present were City Manager Michael McCauley, Assistant City Manager Curt Boganey, Planning and Zoning Specialist Ron Warren, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Deputy City Clerk Camille Yungerberg. O l /09/06 1 DRAFT 5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 6. COUNCIL REPORT Councilmember Lasman stated she attended the Southeast Neighborhood meeting on December 14, 2005. She reminded everyone of the Opportunity Site Open House on January 25, 2006. She stated she will not be attending the Opportunity Site Open House due to a prior commitment. Councilmember O'Connor stated she attended an Open House for the Northbrook Shopping Center area. Mayor Kragness stated there are vacancies on the Brooklyn Center Financial Commission in which the application deadline is January 31, 2006. 7. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember O'Connor requested removal of Item No. 7e, Resolution Appointing Michael J. McCauley as Director and Jim Glasoe as Alternate Director to the Board of Directors of Hennepin Recycling Group and Item No. 7f, Resolution Recognizing the Contributions of Ethnic Populations and Heritage Celebrations from the consent agenda. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carn7ody seconded to approve the consent agenda and agenda as amended, with the removal of Item No. 7e and Item No. 7f from the Consent Agenda to Council Consideration Item No. llh and Item No. lli and the following consent items were approved: 7a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. December 12, 2005 Study Session 2. December 12, 2005 Executive Session 3. December 12, 2005 Regular Session 4. December 12, 2005 Work Session 5. December 22, 2005 Special Session 7b. LICENSES BOWLING ALLEY AMF Earle Brown Lanes 6440 James Circle FIREWORKS Cub Foods 3245 County Road 10 Target Corporation 6100 Shingle Creek Parkway Dollar Saver 6090 Shingle Creek Parkway O l /09/06 2 DRAFT GASOLINE Perfect Car Wash #504 6849 Brooklyn Boulevard B.C. Municipal Garage 6844 Shingle Creek Parkway Christy's Auto Service 5300 Dupont Ave North Humboldt Shell 6840 Humboldt Avenue North Metropolitan Transit 6845 Shingle Creek Parkway Holiday Stationstores, Inc #292 4Z0 66 Ave North Iten Chevrolet Company 6701 Brooklyn Boulevard Osseo-Brooklyn Bus Company 4435 68 Avenue North MECHANICAL Discount Appliance Repair 1455 91 Ave NE, Blaine Residential Heating Air 1815 E. 41 Street, Minneapolis Sterling Design 2205 US Hwy 8, St. Croix Falls Total Refrigeration Systems 949 South Concord Street, St. Paul PUBLIC DANCE AMF Earle Brown Lanes 6440 James Circle RENTAL Renewal Basswood Apts 4450 58` Ave James Lupient Carrington Drive A�ts 1302-08 69 Ave N 6910-20 Humboldt Ave Myra Chazin Beard Ave Apts 6101 Beard Ave Ken Phelan 6331, 6401-25 Beard Ave Clover Management 5308 Emerson Ave N Philip Anderson 5801 Knox Ave N David Trepanier 4207 Lakeside Ave N#226 Beach Condo's Association Initial 3800 62 Ave N Fabian Rodriguez 4204 Lakebreeze Ave N Donald Nieken SECONDHAND GOODS DEALER CD Warehouse 6072 Shingle Creek Parkway GameStop #535 6068 Shingle Creek Parkway GameStop #1704 1307 Brookdale #76 O1/09/06 3 DRAFT TOBACCO e Perfect Car Wash #504 849 Brooklyn Boulevard Humboldt Shell 840 Humboldt Avenue North Hark's Company 501 Humboldt Avenue North Brooklyn Center Conoco 505 69 Ave North Holiday Stationstores, Inc #292 20 66` Ave North Holiday Stationstores, Inc #2099 890 Shingle Creek Parkway Crowne Plaza 200 Freeway Boulevard Walgreen Company #04324 390 Brooklyn Boulevard Value Food 804 Humboldt Avenue North Royal Tobacco 625 Xerxes Avenue North S&I Tobacco LLC 6930 Brooklyn Boulevard Duaos Bros. American Legion Post 630 6110 Brooklyn Boulevard Dollar Saver 6090 Shingle Creek Parkway 7c. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING OFFICIAL NEW5PAPER RESOLUTION NO. 2006-01 7d. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES OF CITY FUNDS RESOLUTION NO. 2006-02 Motion passed unanimously. 8. APPEARANCE —JONETTE ZUERCHER, NORTHWEST HENNEPIN FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATNE, PRESENTATION ON HELPTNG US GROW HOME VISITING PROGRAM AND YOUTH CONNECTIONS PROGRAM Melody Hansen, 6200 West Broadway, Brooklyn Park explained that the Helping Us Grow program is an universal home visiting program that is geared towards families who are expecting, adopting, or have just delivered a baby. She stated it is a collaborative effort from many organizations and stated her goal to share information and seek support. She discussed the growth of the program and stated in 2005 Brooklyn Center had 487 live births, of which, the HUG program saw 29%. She stated of the 29% of families visited, 55% were seen by a public health nurse, 45°/o were seen by the Department of Fainilies and Children in their home. She stated the goal of the program is to maximize the growth in the first few years of life. She stated the desire to include iriformation about the program in the City's Newsletter and or the City's website. She explained the marketing of the program, word of mouth being the most important marketing tool. Councilmember O'Connor responded by asking where funding for the program comes from. Ms. Hansen explained that funding is received partially from the Public Health Department, the County, and grants. Councilmember O'Connor responded by stating that government money should not be used to tell people how to raise their kids and asked what the families are being told. Ms. Hansen explained that only information, guidance, and resources are given. She explained that the prograrn is voluntary and gifts are given to the families. O 1 /09/06 4 DRAF'I' 9. PUBLIC HEARING 9a. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CAAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LAND (EASTERLY OF BROOKLYN BOULEVARD BETWEEN I-94 AND 69TH AVENUE NORTH) —THIS ITEM WAS FIRST READ ON NOVEMBER 14, Z005; PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER ON NOVEMBER 24, 2005; AND OFFERED FOR SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 12, 2005, AT WHICH TIME IT WAS TABLED UNTIL THE FINAL PLAT HAS BEEN FILED. City Manager McCauley stated the plat has not been filed and requested that the Public Hearing be reopened and the Ordinance be tabled until the January 23, 2006 City Council meeting. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded to reopen the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. No public input was offered. Councilmember Carmody moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to table an Ordinance Ainending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Zoning Classification of Certain Land (Easterly of Brooklyn Boulevard Between I-94 and 69th Avenue North) and continue the Public Hearing until the January 23, 2006, City Council meeting. Motion passed unanimously. 10. PLANNING COMMISSION TTEM 10a. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2005-018 SUBMITTED BY SPIRITUAL LIFE MINISTRIES. REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL TO ESTABLISH A BIBLE COLLEGE AND FOR SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 7,583 SQ. FT. ADDITION TO THE SPIRITUAL LIFE CHURCH, 6865 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION AT ITS DECEMBER 15, 2005, MEETING. Mr. McCauley explained that the request is to expand the facility. He stated the Planning Commission has recommended approval. He displayed an aerial view of the property. Planning and Zoning Specialist Ron Warren explained that the property is zoned C1, Educational Uses, Post Secondary, or known as Special Uses. He stated the addition will be made to the upper floor of the Southeast corner, totaling 7,500 sq feet. He explained that the addition will consist of classrooms and office space for the bible college. He stated no other site improvements are proposed and the Planning Commission has recommended approval subject to six conditions. Ol/09106 5 DRAFT Councilmember Lasman inquired of the accreditation of the Association for Biblical Higher Education and if it were a State of Minnesota organization. Pastor Joseph Fornara, 6865 Shingle Creek Parkway, stated the Association for Biblical Higher Education is a licensed and recognized accredited association under the Department of Education, however is not associated with the State of Minnesota. He stated it is the affiliation with the Department of Education and their requirements that has caused the necessity of the plan. He stated in order to meet the general education requirements of an accrediting association, rnore professors, an updated library facility, and additional secular courses will be needed in the future. Councilmember Carniody moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to approve Planning Coinmission Application No. 2005-018 subject to the following conditions recommended by the Planning Commission: 1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Officiat with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Any altered grading, drainage or utility plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. The building additions are to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the city ordinances. 4. The applicant shall provide appropriate erasion and sediment control devices on site during construction as approved by the city Engineering Department. 5. The special use permit is granted for a bible college within the meaning of an educational use as provided for in Section 35-320, Subdivision 3d of the City's zoning ordinance. Any change in this use not comprehended by this application or permitted under the zoning ordinance will require approval of an amendment to this special use permit. 6. The special use permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances and regulations and any violation thereof shall be grounds for revocation. Motion passed unanimously. 11. COUNCIL CONSIDERA.TION ITEMS lla. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION AND APPRECIATION OF MEMBERS WHO HAVE SERVED ON CITY COMMISSIONS RESOLUTION NO. 20D6-03 Mayor Kragness asked Councilmember Carmody to read the resolutions while she distributed the certificates. O1f09/06 6 DRAFT Councilmember Carmody read the resolution expressing recognition and appreciation of the following members wl�o lzave served on City commissions: Donna Allard, NWHHSC Advisory Commission 02/28/OS-07/26/OS Mary Barrus, Housing Commission 04/22/02-03/09/OS Eric Berns, Planning Commission 06/27/OS-12/10/OS Craig Hauger, Park and Recreation Commission 12/08/03-03/15/OS Rex Newman, Planning Commission 09/09l96-12/31/OS Lawrence Peterson, Financial Commission 10/25/93-12/31/04 Dianne Reem, Planning Commission 02/22/93-06/16/OS Earl Simons, Financial Commission 08/23/04-12/31/OS er Lasman seconded ado tion of Counc�lmember Carmody moved and Councilmemb p RESOLUTION NO. 2006-03 Expressing Recognition and Appreciation of Members who have Served on City Commissions. Motion passed unanimously. 11b. MAYORAL REAPPOINTMENTS TO CITY ADVISORY COMMISSIONS Mayor Kragness requested ratification of the following reappointments to City Advisory Commissions: Financial Commission Donn Escher 3107 65th Avenue North Housing Cominission Judy Thorbus 6265 Brooklyn Drive David Johnson 3500 Admiral Lane Park and Recreation Commission Bud Sorenson 6901 Toledo Avenue North Richard Theis 3006 Thurber Road Plannin� Commission Rachel Lund 4502 58th Avenue North, #301 Timothy Roche' 816 69th Avenue North Northwest Hennenin Human Services Council Advisorv Commission Audrey Harris-Blount 3429 53rc3 Avenue North, #106 Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission. Rex Newman 3107 61 st Avenue North O 1 /09/06 7 DRAFT Councilmember O'Connor stated she would like to postpone the commission appointments until January 31, 2006, so that other more suited parties can apply. Councilmember Carmody responded due to current vacancies and the time served by current members, postponing the reappointments would not be appropriate. Mayor Kragness stated current members have shown great interest and have provided good service, therefore they should be reappointed. She added that the openings are always advertised. Councilmember Carmody moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to ratify the above Mayoral nominations. Councilmember O'Com�or voted against the same. Motion passed. 11c. MAYORAL APPOINTMENTS OF CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO SERVE AS LIAISONS TO CITY ADVISORY COMMISSIONS AND AS CITY REPRESENTATIVES FOR OTHER ORGANIZATIONS FOR 2006 Mayor Kragness requested ratification of the following to serve as liaisons to City Advisory Commissions and as City representatives for other organizations for 2006: Commission/Or�anization Council Member Financial Commission Kay Lasman Housing Commission Kathleen Carmody Park and Recreatian Commission Mary O'Connor Crime Preventiozl Program Kay Lasman NW Suburbs Cable Con?munications Commission Diane Niesen League of Minnesota Cities Kathleen Carmody North Metro Mayors Association Myrna Kragness Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Myrna Kragness and Diane Niesen Brooklyn Center Special Events Committee Kay Lasman Earle Brown Days Committee Kathleen Carmody Mpls. Metro North Convention &Visitors Bureau Myrna Kragness North Hennepin Chamber of Commerce Myrna Kragness Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded to ratify the above Mayoral nominations. in for membershi s to both the cilmeinber O Coriiior stated o osition to the Cit a p Coun pp Y p Y g League of Minnesota Cities ai�d the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities due to the City being over budget in 2005. She stated according to the Charter, the City should not have a Park and Recreation Commission or a Housing Commission along with other boards/commissions and the Council should be doing the work of those boards/commissions. She inquired as to why the Planning Cornmission does not have a liaison. City Manager McCauley explained that the City of Brooklyn Center's boards/commissions are that of advisory only, the Charter is referring to boards/commissions that have authority. He further explained that the Planning Commission is required by State law and it is only tradition that there is no liaison. Ol/09/06 8 DRAFT Councilmember Niesen suggested that the City Council discuss having a liaison for the Planning Commission. Mayor Kragness responded it has not been necessary to have a liaison to the Planning Caminission in the past. Mr. McCauley explained why state law requires a Planning Cammission. Councilmember Lasman stated a liaison is not necessary because sufficient reports are received from the Planning Commission. Councilmember O'Corulor voted against the same. Motion passed. 11 d. SELECT PRESIDING OFFICERS MAYOR PRO TEM AND ACTING MAYOR PRO TEM Mayor Kragness requested ratification of Councilmember Lasman as Mayor (President) Pro Tem and Councihnember Carmody Acting Mayor (President) Pro Tem. Councilmember O'Connor asked if Councilmember Lasman had been the Acting Mayor in the past and suggested someone new be given a chance. Mayor Kragness responded that the Mayor Pro Tem is determined by the number of votes during the election. City Manager McCauley explained that the Acting Mayor/President Pro Tem would be the most senior Councilmember in the absence of both the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem. He stated the Charter provides that the City Council chooses from its members, the President Pro Tem who serves as the President in the Mayor's absence. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded ratification of Councilmember Lasman as Mayor (President) Pro Tem and Councilmember Carmody Acting Mayor (President) Pro Tem. Councilmember O'Connor aslced Councilmember Niesen if she would like to be the Mayor Pro Tem. Councilinember Niesen responded if she were to be asked, she would accept because cross training is important. Councilmember O'Connor voted against the same. Motion passed. lle. RESOLUTION DECLARING COMMITMENT TO THE BROOKLYN CENTER CITY CHARTER RESOLUTION NO. 2006-Q4 Mayor Kragness read the Resolution Declaring Commitment to the Brooklyn Center City Charter. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded adoption of RESQLUTION NO. 2006-04 Declaring Commitment to the Brooklyn Center City Charter. Motion passed wlaniinously. Ol/09/06 9 DRAFT llf. RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED USE OF 2006 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS RESOLUTION NO. 2006-OS City Manager McCauley stated the Public Hearing is proposed for February 13, 2006. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 2006-OS Calling for a Public Hearing on Proposed Use of 2006 Urban Hennepin County Cammunity Development Block Grant Funds. Councilmember O'Connor asked that a representative of Hennepin County be present at the Public Hearing to answer questions regarding the allocation of funds. Councilmernber Carmody responded by suggesting that the questions be submitted prior to the meeting so that answers can be provided, rather than requiring someone to attend the meeting. Mayor Kragness stated materials will be distributed to the City Council detailing the allocation of funds. Motion passed unanimously. llg. COUNCIL MEMBER NIESEN: REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE RECORDINGS FROM 2005 AND 2004 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFERENCES Councilmember Niesen stated she attended the National League of Cities Conference and explained that a half day seminar costs $100 and a full day seminar costs $160. She explained that the total cost to send her to the seminar was $2,500. She discussed the various sessions that were available and the value of them. She stated this was the first year that recordings of the seminars were available. S11e explained that sending someone to all of the classes included on the CD's would cost $2,300 excluding airfare. She stated the goal was to return with the recordings of the seminars and share with other Councilmembers. She stated she had the opportunity ta purchase two years worth of seminars for $396.80. She explained that she called the City Manager while at the seminar who explained that in previous similar situations, reimbursement se the materials and that it is the Cit was demed. She stated she made the dceisi�n to purcha Y Council's choice as to whether her fami�y will absorb the cost or if she will be reimbursed. Mayor Kragness stated opposition to reimbursement due to lack of authorization. She stated Councilmember Niesen was to report back to the City Council with the information she obtained while attending the sessions. She stated recordings of the seminars have been offered for many years. Councilmenlber Carmody stated if the City Council had decided to develop a training library prior to her attendance at the confer-ence, she would have been in favor of reimbursement. She stated she is not in favor of reimbursement because the materials were purchased without a discussion or prior consent. Councilmember Lasman stated agreement with Mayor Kragness and Councilmember Carmody and added that a library of information from seminars would be a waste of money in the long run due to changes in laws that make information current for only a short time. O 1/09/06 1 DRAFT Councilmember Niesen stated she feels that it is the City's future leaders that will lose in this situation. She stated there is no policy regarding this situation and other Councilmembers have acted alone in different situations. She stated the City is missing out and she saved the City $400.00 by providing her own transportation to the airport and not eating meals at City expense for a day. llh. (FORMERLY CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 7E.) RESOLUTION APPOINTING MICHAEL J. MCCAULEY AS DIRECTOR AND JIM GLASOE AS ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF HENNEPIN RECYCLING GROUP RESOLUTION NO. 2006-06 Councilmember O'Connor asked for clarification of the purpose of the Board of Directors of Hennepin Recycling Group. City Manager McCauley stated the group operates the recycling program for three cities. CouncilmemUer Cannody moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 2006-06 Appointing Michael J. McCauley as Director and Jim Glasoe as Alternate Director to the Board of Directors of Hennepin Recycling Group. Motion passed unanimously. lli. (FORMERLY CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 7F.) RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF ETHNIC POPULATIONS AND HERITAGE CELEBRATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 2006-07 Councilmember O'Connor stated the best way to honor and respect the citizens of Brooklyn Center is to allow them to live their lives the way they choose, witl�out interference. Councilmember Carmody moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 2006-p7 Recognizing the Contributions of Ethnic Populations and Heritage Celebrations. Motion passed unanimously. 12. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Carmody moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 8:30 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. City Clerk Mayor O1l09/06 11 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION FEBRUARY 13, 2006 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum and was called to order by Mayor Myrna Kragness at 6:45 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Myrna Kragness and Councilmembers Kathleen Carmody, Kay Lasman, Diane Niesen, and Mary O'Connor. Also present were City Manager Michael McCauley, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Deputy City Clerk Camille Yungerberg. Myrna Kragness opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Qpen Forum. Penny Nickles-Larkin described the accident where her mother-in-law was hit by a car, resulting in her death. She stated concern that the Police acted in bias based on the age of her mother-in- law, the incident was improperly investigated, and inaccurate assumptions were made. She stated the Police Department needs sensitivity training and should not make snap judgments. She requested that the City review the scene of the accident and make the cross walk safer. Mayor Kragness offered condolences and stated the accident remains under investigation and the Police will be contacting Mrs. Nickles-Larkin regarding the matter. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded to close the Informal Open Forum at 6:55 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 2. INVOCATION Mayor Kragness offered a prayer as the invocation. FLAG CEREMONY Boy Scout Troop 403 presented the flags. Assistant Scout Master Allen Peterzane introduced the members of Boy Scout Troop 403. 2/13/06 -1- DRAFT 3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session and was called to order by Mayor Myrna Kragness at 7:04 p.m. Councilmember O'Connor announced availability of a public copy of the agenda packet. 4. ROLL CALL Mayor Myrna Kragness and Councilmembers Kathleen Carmody, Kay Lasman, Diane Niesen, and Mary O'Connor. Also present were City Manager Michael McCauley, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Deputy City Clerk Camille Yungerberg. 5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 6. COUNCIL REPORT Councilmember O'Connor stated she attended the Opportunity Site meeting. Councilmember Lasman stated she attended a Neighborhood Champions Dinner and Awards Ceremony at Earle Brown Elementary School where 58 honorees received medallions and awards for being champions in their neighborhoods on January 31 St She stated on February 4 she attended Brooklyn Center's 95th Birthday Party and Awards Night where people were honored for doing outstanding work in their community and to celebrate Brooklyn Center's 95�' Birthday. She discussed the entertainment at the event. She stated on February 5`�' she attended the Lions Waffle breakfast which was well attended and more are planned for the future. She stated on February 8` she attended the Grand Opening of District 279's Adult Education Center which was well attended. She stated the center will be a great asset to the comrnunity. Councilmember Carmody stated she also attended the Opportunity Site meeting and Champion Dinner. She stated she also participated in the Art Show judging for Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council Art Show. She stated she attended the Watershed Meeting where information will be included in the u date. She stated she attended the Twin West Ghamber Legislative P Breakfast. She announced that Mayor Kragness received an award from the Brooklyn Center Charitable Foundation for her contributions to the community. Mayor Kragness stated she attended many of the same events along with the ribbon cutting far adult education building which was heartwarming. She stated the dinner and entertainment were wonderful at the birthday party. 7. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Lasman moved and Counci�member Carmody seconded to approve the consent agenda and agenda as amended, with the removal of Item No. 7a. Approval of the Minutes of 2/13/06 -2- DRAFT January 9, 2046 Regular Session from the Consent Agenda and amendment of item 9j. Resolution an Stadium Vote to discussion only and the following consent items were approved: Councilmember O'Connor and Councilmember Niesen discussed the possibility of reading a resolution to be considered as item 9j. City Attorney Charlie LeFevere explained that the Charter requires resolutions to be presented in writing unless a reading is consented to unanimously per Section 3.07. 7a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —Councilmembers not present at meetings will be recorded as abstaining from the vote on the minutes. 1. January 23, 2006 Regular Session 2. January 23, 2006 Study Session 3. January 23, 2006 Work Session 7b. LICENSES GASOLINE SERVICE STATION Brooklyn BP, Inc 6044 Brooklyn Boulevard Qwest Communications 6540 Shingle Creek Parkway MECHANICAL Nordic Services 12006 12 Ave S, Burnsville Stern Heating Cooling Inc 1927 W 5�' Street, Red Wing RENTAL Renewal 3319 63` Ave N( Single Family) Linda Yang 4518 65 Ave N(Single Family) Ernest Anyanwu 1100 69�' Ave N(1 Bldg, 7 Units) Evan Lutheran Church of the Master 4207 Lakeside Ave N#134 (Single Family) William Linda Bjerke Initial 6807 Quail Ave N(Single Family) Eric Cooper 1510 69�' Ave N(1 Bldg, 4 Units) Howard Lapides 4110 Lakebreeze Ave N(1 Bldg, 4 Units) Lee Thao 6206 Noble Ave N(Single Family) Edward Roe 6906 Toledo Ave N(Single Family) Edward Row SIGNHANGER Contact Signs 1803 Victoria St N, Roseville 2/13/06 -3- DRAFT TOBACCO RELATED PRODUCT Brooklyn BP, Inc 6044 Brooklyn Boulevard Brooklyn Center Municipal #1 5625 Xe�es Avenue North I Brooklyn Center Municipal #2 6930 Brooklyn Boulevard, Suite 2 7c. APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE SUBMITTED BY ST. ALPHONSUS PARISH, 7025 HALIFAX AVENUE NORTH, FOR AN EVENT TO BE HELD MARCH 17, 2006 7d. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-11 CALLING FOR A HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DISEASED TREE REMOVAL COSTS, DELINQUENT WEED REMOVAL COSTS, AND DELINQUENT PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICE ACCOUNTS 7e. RESOLUTION NO. 2006- 12 ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S FEASISILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2006-05, 06, 07 AND 08, HUMBOLDT AVENUE AND EARLE BROWN DRIVE STREET, STORM DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS 7f. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-13 DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2006-05, CONTRACT 2006-B, HUMBOLDT AVENUE AND EARLE BROWN DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS 7g. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-14 ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING A CONTRACT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2005-18, CONTRACT 2005-I, CENTRAL PARK BALLFIELD LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS 7h. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-15 APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR INTERCHANGE ADDITION 7i. SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE REDUCTION ESTATES OF RIVERWOOD Councilmember O'Connor voted against the same. Motion passed. 8. PUBLIC HEARING 2/13/06 -4- DRAFT 8a. PROPOSED USE OF 2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS 1. RESOLUTION NO 2006-16 APPROVING PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR 2006 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE OF SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY AND ANY THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS City Manager Michael McCauley explained that annually, the federal government makes funds available to Hennepin County to distribute to communities who are not eligible to receive Community Development Block Grants themselves. He stated the allacation requires a public hearing for the proposed use of funds. He explained that the bulk of the money is to be used for projects benefiting low-income persons. He explained that the City received a fourth request for funding; however it is recommended that the first three requests be granted. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seeonded to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Joe Walter, Home Program, Senior Community Services, thanked the City Council for continued support and stated they are anxious to continue providing services to senior residents. He stated they spent 420 hours last year painting and performing minor repairs. Steve Kline, Executive Director of CEAP, stated they have received funds which they use to serve the community. He stated they have served 255 seniors in Brooklyn Center. Councilmember Carmody moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 2006-16 Approving Projected Use of Funds for 2006 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program and Authorizing Signature of Subrecipient Agreement with Hennepin County and Any Third Party Agreements. Councilmember O'Connor inquired about the letter from Hennepin County's Department of Housing Community Works and Transit showing an outstanding balance. She inquired about the balance, interest, and the timeframe of the loan. Mr. McCauley explained the period of expenditure where if the funds are not spent, they are returned to HUD. 2/13/06 -5- DRAFT Councilmember O' Connor stated disagreement with the federal government giving money to Hennepin County to give to Brooklyn Center. She stated residents should keep their tax money instead of spending it on staff to support all of the transactions. Mr. McCauley explained that demand for services is greater than the supply of funding therefore the money will be expended in the window of time provided. He stated in response to the funding restrictions, the City has put the recommended percentage of allocation into the home rehabilitation program. He stated the remaining funds are then used to fund two programs that target assisting seniors. Councilmember O'Connar voted against the same. Motion passed. 9. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS 9a. RESOLUTION NO. 2006- 17 RECOGNIZING AN AWARD TO EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER Mayor Kragness read the Resolution Recognizing an Award to Earle Brown Heritage Center. Councilmember Niesen moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 2006-17 recognizing an Award to Earle Brown Heritage Center. Motion passed unanimously. 9b. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-18 AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION OF A NOISE WALL ALONG INTERSTATE 94/694 IN BROOKLYN CENTER BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Mr. McCauley stated MnDOT is proposing to construct a noise wall along the interstate. He stated the proposal requires City Council approval and while it is not a City project, MnDOT can not undertake the construction of the structure without City Council approvaL Peter Wasko, Air and Noise Quality Expert for the Metro District of MnDOT, explained the Type 2 Noise Wall Program. He stated the program was mandated for a period of three years by legislation to conduct the study in 1996, expiring in 2000. He stated MnDOT Metro District is the only district within MnDOT that currently funds this program. He stated the areas are ranked by priority. He explained that of the residents affected, 10 agreed with the wall, five disagreed with the wall, and two were undecided. Greg Kern, Project Manager for Pre Design and Final Design, stated the noise wall will be 20 feet in height and 1,000 feet from Dupont Avenue. He explained that MnDOT will automatically relocate the needed fiber optic line. Councilmember Niesen asked if the wall could block the sun and possibly harrn the vegetation. Peter Wasco responded concerns are generally over the view of the structure and not vegetation. Ralph Van Beusekom explained that he has lived in his home since it was built and the noise is 2l13f06 -6- DRAFT significant, not allowing him to open his bedroom windows. He asked which side of the wall the fence would be on. Wayne Norris, West Area Engineer responded the wall would be on the highway side of the fence. Mida Oskcan stated opposition to the wall that would compromise her view. Councilmember O'Connor inquired about the percentage of noise reduction the wall will provide. Mr. Wasko responded it depends on how close the person is to the end of the wall, however, generally, it will reduce the noise from five to 10 decibels. The City Council discussed the plank design of the proposed wall. Mr. McCauley explained that if the proposal is approved as presented, no cost will be assessed to the City. He stated if the City Council wished to upgrade the building materials, the City would be responsible for the difference in cost. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 2006-18 Authorizing Construction of a Noise Wall along Interstate 94/694 in Brooklyn Center by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Councilmember Carmody stated the majority of the residents are in favor of the wall, therefore she will vote in favor. Motion passed unanimously. 9c. MAYORAL APPOINTMENT TO WATERSHED COMMISSIONS Mayor Kragness requested ratification of the appointment of Kathleen Carmody to the Watershed Commission. She explained that there is a vacancy and Councilmember Carrnody has expressed interest. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded to ratify the Mayoral Appointment to Watershed Commission. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember O'Connor volunteered to be an alternate. Councilmember Niesen suggested that positions be advertised to allow a fair chance of application. 2/13/06 -7- DRAFT 9d. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ON LIMITING THE NUMBER OF CARS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS 1. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING THE PARKING AND/OR STORAGE OF VEHICLES, TRAILERS AND WATERCRAFT IN FRONT YARDS OR YARDS ABUTTING A PUBLIC STREET Mr. McCauley stated the City Council was approached by Mr. Dahn who suggested changes to the City Code with respect to vehicle parking which was referred ta the Planning Commission who reviewed the recommendations and recommended one change to Chapter 19 with respect to the number of cars allowed to park in residential zones. Councilmember Niesen stated the following reasons she does not support the change to the City Code: Significant change without merit. Wide configuration of driveways that accommodate more than six cars in the City. Residents did not speak at public hearing showing the change is not supported. Have not received complaints regarding the number of cars. Significant reasons for the change were not given. The Planning Commission minutes do not show anyone putting forth argument or facts as to why it should be limited and those who voted in favor of did not list reasons. Have not seen a crying need, only Mr. Dahn. Councilmember Carmody stated she received a call after the newspaper article stating favor of the proposal. She explained that when more than six cars are parked at one residence, it tends to appear like a used car lot. She explained that if the 50% of yard coverage method was used, her yard could accommodate 12 vehicles. She stated the concern is not a large one, however if you live near a house who parks more than six cars on their property, it is a concern. Councilmember O'Connor responded residents should be able to do what they want on their land. Councilmember O'Connor moved and Councilmember Niesen seconded to change the date of the second reading and Public Hearing on the ordinanee to March 27, 2006. Councilmember Carmody and Councilmember Lasman stated opposition to the extension of the date. Councilmember Niesen responded Councilmember O'Connor asked for consideration on an item that is not an emergency and could wait until she is present. Mayor Kragness stated she lic hearin and collection of ublic is not opposed to postponing the item, allowing for a pub g p input. When asked, three attendees raised their hands, showing interest in speaking on item at a public hearing. Councilmember Carmody and Councilmember Lasman voted against the same. Motion passed. Sherry Higgins, 6312 Indiana Avenue North, stated they take pride in the neighborhood and feels this change is beneficiaL 2/13/06 -8- DRAFT Will Dahn, 5733 Knox Avenue North, stated the ordinance was enforced effectively however has not been enforced or used in 15-20 years. Tony Kuefler, 5943 Abbott Avenue, stated favor of limiting the number of vehicles in residential areas. Councilmember Lasman stated she has been approached several times regarding this item. She stated all problems are related to the fact that over six cars is too many. She stated allowing far six cars, plus gazage stalls is reasonable. Mayor Kragness stated people that have called on this item are people that are concerned with how the neighborhoods look and the decreasing value. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded to approve first reading and set second reading and Public Hearing on the ordinance for March 27, 2006. Councilmember O'Connor voted against the same. Motion passed. Councilmember Niesen recommended that the item be publicized more. 9e. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-19 ORDERING THE COR.RECTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND FURTHER FOR THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCES, SAFETY AND HEALTH HAZARDS WITH RESPECT TO THAT REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5307 PENN AVENUE NORTH, BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, BLOCK l ROBERT L. HANSEN'S FIRST ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Councilmember O'Connor stated the building could be fixed and the City should not be able to take the building down. Mr. McCauley explained the damage to the structure and the process for removal. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 2006-19 Ordering the Correction of Hazardous Conditions and Further for the Abatement of Public Nuisances, Safety and Health Hazards with Respect to that Rea1 Estate Located at 5307 Penn Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Legally Described as Lot 2, Block 1 Robert L. Hansen's First Addition Hennepin County, Minnesota in the City of Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Councilmember O'Connor voted against the same. Motion passed. 9f. EAVE ENCROACHMENT ON SIDE YARD SETBACK AND GARAGE HEIGHTS 2/13/06 -9- DRAFT Mr. McCauley explained that while reviewing this matter with the Building Official, he confirmed that the City is more likely to see 18 to 24 inch eaves than 12 inch eaves. He stated the side yard setbacks are such that there is no safety or particular aesthetic concern with respect to an eave being another six to 12 inches wider than currently allowed. He stated it is recommended that this be referred to the Planning Commission for review and potentially changing the ordinance to provide for a wider eave encroachment. He explained changes in roof pitch that also affects the needed width of eaves and garage heights. Councilmember Carmody moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to refer the eave overhang depth to the Planning Commission, and refer the garage height ordinance to the Planning Commission to report back in timely manner. Councilmember O'Connor discussed a possibility of a variance. Mr. Wilson stated he would rather see a change to the ordinance rather than a variance, to prevent others from experiencing these difficulties. Motian passed unanimously. Councilmember Carmody moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to suspend enforcement of the ordinanee relating to eaves until the City Council has reviewed the item further. Motion passed unanimously. S 9. REPORT ON FRANCHISE FEES g Mr. McCauley stated during the last year, the City Council received a report of franchise fees and requested a report in 2006. He stated as indicated in the report, $662,000 was received in electric and gas franchise fees which is approxirnately $2,000 more than anticipated. He stated franchise fees are used to provide funding for street reconstruction. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded to direct staff to submit the Franchise Fees report annually. Motion passed unanimously. 9h. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-20 REGARDING DISPOSITION OF COOP NORTHWEST PROGRAM FUNDS Mr. McCaule stated COOP Northwest disbanded a few ears a o and have determined that they I Y Y g have $168,000 in COOP Northwest funds that remain. He stated of tk�ese funds, they have allocated some to Brooklyn Center. They have recommended that the money be used for purposes consistent with the mission of COOP Northwest. He stated due to their inability to trace the funding, the recommendation is that the money be applied to the City's annual membership costs. 2/13/06 -10- DRAFT Councilmember Carmody inquired about the time limit that someone could claim the funds. Mr. LeFevere responded ordinarily the statute of limitation is six years. The City Council discussed various ways to utilize the funds. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded to adopt Resolution No. 2006-20 Regarding Disposition of COOP Northwest Program Funds. The City Council discussed options to elevate the risk that COOP Northwest will retract the funds. Councilmember Carmody asked about the interest on the funds. Mr. LeFevere suggested changing the resolution to state the Human Services Council should retain Brooklyn Center's allocation of the COOP Northwest Funding which allocation with accruing interest there on shall be applied to future assessments. He stated this would allow the Human Services Council to hold the money and Brooklyn Center would get the credit for the interest earned. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded to amend the motion to change wording as suggested by Mr. LeFevere. Motion passed unanimously. 9i. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-21 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES AND AUTHORIZING SOLICITATION OF BIDS FOR 2006 SEAL COATING Mr. McCauley stated the City has jointly gone out for seal coating bids with Coon Rapids, Fridley, Andover, and Columbia Heights and has saved money by working cooperatively. He stated this would allow the City to add members without a formal joint powers amendment. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2006-21 approving an Amendment to Joint Powers Agreement for Street Maintenance Activities and Authorizing Solicitation of Bids for 2006 Seal Coating. Motion passed unanimously. 9j. RESOLUTION ON STADIUM VOTE Councilmember Niesen stated she was contacted by a citizen who was wondering how the City Council felt on sending a resolution to Hennepin County and the State Representatives about whether we were in favor of supporting a vote on taxable measures or a levy for the Twins Stadium. She stated she requested this agenda item so that the City Council could discuss and decide on a plan. She stated she was going to type a resalution, however she has not found a sample resolution to this effect. She stated some feel it may not come up in this legislative session, however Hennepin County indicated that incorrect information has been floating around. She wanted to get all of the information from Hennepin County before proceeding. 2/13/06 -11- DRAFT Roger Kloster stated there is a State law that says if you want to increase sales taY, it has to be approved by a vote of the citizens on a referendum; however, Hennepin County is approaching the State legislature to be exempt from this law. He stated in Brooklyn Center the majority of the people are law abiding and feel they would like an opportunity to vote on the stadium tax. He requested that the City Council pass a resolution resolving that Hennepin County uphold the State law requiring a referendum. Councilmernber Niesen stated that a vote is necessary before a stadium ta�c is enforced. She stated she will prepare a resolution for the next City Council meeting. 20. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Carmody moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 8:50 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. City Clerk Mayor i I 2/13/06 -12- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION FEBRUARY 13, 2006 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session and was called to order by Mayor Myrna Kragness at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Myrna Kragness and Councilmembers Kathleen Carmody, Kay Lasman, Diane Niesen, and Mary O'Connor. Also present were City Manager Michael McCauley, Public Works Director/City Engineer Todd Blomstrom, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Deputy City Clerk Camille Yungerberg. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF AGENDA ITEMS AND QUESTIONS The City Council discussed the Application and Permit for a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License Submitted by St. Alphonsus Parish. Councilmember Carmody stated concern that the holder of the certificate on the Certificate of Coverage lists City of Brooklyn Park for the Ternporary On- Sale Liquor License submitted by St. Alphonsus Parish. City Manager McCauley responded it would be corrected. The City Council discussed the minutes of the January 9, 2006, Regular City Council meeting. Councilmember Niesen discussed the proposed minutes she had prepared regarding her request for reimbursement for National League of Cities training materials. Councilmember Carmody stated the minutes written by Councilmember Niesen are too long and suggested moving forward with the original changes submitted by Councilmember Niesen. Councilmember Niesen stated the allowed length of minutes is not specified and the topic is important and will be visited again in the future. She stated her submittal was not verbatim and she would appreciate the new changes being approved as part of the minutes. Councilmember Carmody responded she will vote against approval because Councilmember Niesen's submittal is too lengthy. Councilmember Niesen explained that after viewing the tape she realized the original minutes were incorrect. Councilmember Carmody stated she also watched the video and the original minutes are correct. Councilmember Carmody stated too much time has been spent on this item and Councilmembers should not be able to write the minutes. Mayor Kragness stated dictation of how the minutes are presented should not be occurring; only minor changes should be made. She stated minutes are not verbatim, word for word discussions. Councilmember 2/13/06 1 DRAFT Niesen stated she will pull it off the consent agenda for a discussion on air because this will be brought up again and the base points should be included in the minutes. She stated she can e t d the attempt to shorten them again if needed, possibly using bullets. Mayor Kragn ss sta. e changes made by Councilmember Niesen to her comments are not correct as they were in the original minutes. Councilmember Carmody and Councilmember Lasman stated Councilmember Niesen's proposed paragraphs l, 2, and 6 should be omitted from the minutes with the remainder further abbreviated. Councilmember O'Connor stated paragraphs 1, 2, and 6 should be included in the minutes. Mayor Kragness responded the proposed changes are too wordy and not every single item Councilmember Niesen said should be included in the minutes, Councilmember Lasman stated the minutes should be a snapshot of what happened, a summary, not details. Mayor Kragness, Councilmember Lasman, and Cauncilmember Carmody stated the item should be further abbreviated. Councilmember O'Connor and Councilmember Niesen thought the full paragraphs should be inserted into the minutes. Councilmember Lasman requested that the following change be made to page 10: Councilmember Lasman stated agreement with Mayor Kragness and Councilmember Carmody and added that a library of information fram seminars would be a waste of money in the long run due to changes in-�a�s le�islation that make information current for only a short time. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Carmody moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to close the Study Session at 6:45 .m. P Motion passed unanimously. I City Clerk Mayor 2/13/06 2 DRAFT I MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WORK SESSION FEBRUARY 13, 2006 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council/Economic Development Authority met in Work Session and was called to order by Mayor/President Myrna Kragness at 8:37 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor/President Myrna Kragness and Councilmembers/Commissioners Kathleen Carmody, Kay Lasman, Diane Niesen, and Maxy O'Connor. Also present were City Manager/Executive Director Michael McCauley, and Deputy City Clerk Camille Yungerberg. INTRODUCTION OF PROPOSAL TO CREATE A CODE OF CITY COUNCIL POLICIES City Manger McCauley outlined the proposed Code of City Policies that would provide a compilation of City Council policies with a table of contents to facilitate reference to the policies. Currently, there is not such compilation. Adoption of the Code would provide a fresh starting point and the ability to find City Council policies. Council Member Niesen asked about the repeal of all former policies. Mr. McCauley affirmed that undoubtedly there were policy type resolutions since the incorporation of the Village 95 years earlier of which no one is currently aware. The proposal was designed to address this issue prospectively since new policies would be codified and revisions and deletions would similarly be treated. The proposal was for the City Council to review the policies to determine if there were any that should be deleted. It was proposed that a Code be adopted so that a starting point would be established. Subsequently, the City Council could propose new policies and adequate time undertaken to discuss and review such proposals. The City Council was to provide proposed deletions to the City Manager before the March 13`�' meeting. The City Manager would collate all of the City Council suggestions and place them on the March 13�' Work Session with a goal of identifying a proposed Code of City Council Policies for adoption at the March 27�' meeting. 2/13/06 1 DR.AFT COUNCIL MEMBER NIESEN: CABLE MESSAGE BOARD Councilmember Niesen stated the message board should display the purpose of the board and when it is going to be updated. Councilmember Carmody responded she has never heard a complaint regarding the message board. Mayor Kragness stated it is irritating when the events listed on the message board are outdated. Mr. McCauley explained that the technology is outdated and not easy to use. He explained that a computer based technology would be better manageable and would cost $6,000 to $7,000 to fix the problem. He stated money was not budgeted for these upgrades; however the City collects sufficient monies from cable franchise fees to cover this type of expenditure. Councilmember Niesen stated she would like to see the system upgraded. She requested that all money from cable go to communications purposes. It was the consensus of the City Council to go forward with replacing the cable message generator. COUNCIL MEMBER O'CONNOR: DISCUSSION OF LIST OF VENDORS OVER $10,000 Councilmember O'Connor stated the City spent $22,451,672.00 on vendors in 2005. She stated this does not include wages of $7,615,098. Councilmember O'Connor and Mr. McCauley discussed the amount spent on wages and benefits. MAYOR KRAGNESS: DISCUSSION OF CRITERIA FOR CITY BANKING SERVICES Mayor Kragness stated concern that local banks who contribute more to the community than others are not the ones getting the City's banking business. Mr. McCauley stated there are certain requirements of community reinvestments, however relates to loans and not social services. Mayor Kragness responded Bremer Bank is always providing funding for various community events and the other major bank holds the City's checking accounts. She explained that last year, the money promised by the majar bank was not contributed. She stated if a bank contri butes li ke some do, we shou l d do business with them. Mr. McCauley stated it is not a criteria that the City can use. He explained that when the City requests banking servi�es, it has to determine which banks is the best total cost for services. He stated the City can not give business to a bank in order to get contributions. Councilmember Carmody stated Kathy Ballet has won awards associated with Earle Brown Days and is associated with Wells Fargo. Councilmember Lasman stated if the services are comparable; the City should give the business to Bremer Bank because they contribute to the community. 2/13/06 2 DRAFT COUNCIL MEMBER CARMODY: CITY COUNCIL RETREAT Councilmember Carmody stated she is not interested in having a retreat. Mayor Kragness stated a retreat is not necessary this spring. She stated the previous retreats have not been beneficial to the City Council. Councilmember Lasman stated the retreats are valuable only if those attending want to be present. Councilmember O'Connor stated she does not mind if there is no retreat this spring. Councilmember Niesen stated she does not mind if there is no retreat, however believes that there are things that could be improved and the retreats are beneficial. COUNCIL MEMBER O'CONNOR: REVIEW OF 69 BROOKLYN BLVD. LIQUOR STORE RESULTS Councilmember O'Connor stated she would like to review the total revenue from both liquor stores. She stated the full administrative service fee was not transferred and a net income of $15,000 is showing. She suggested discussing this at the joint meeting with the Financial Commission in March. She stated it might be a good time to sell both liquor stores. Mayor Kragness asked Councilmember O'Connor where the profits gained from the liquor stores, totaling over $100,000 would come from. Councilmember O' Connor responded by selling the liquor stores, a reduction in administration could take place. Councilmember Niesen stated the matter could be discussed at the joint meeting with the Financial Commission in March. Councilmember Carmody stated concern with the present lease agreement for the facilities. Mr. McCauley responded if the municipal liquor was abolished, the lease at the Cub Foods site could be terminated. Mayor Kragness responded the citizens voted for municipal liquors and the City would lose money if they were to close. Councilmember O'Connor suggested that the matter be discussed at the Maxch 6, 2006, Work Session. Councilmember Niesen agreed with Councilmember O'Connor. Mayor Kragness and Councilmembers Carmody, Lasman, and Niesen disagreed that the matter should be discussed at the March 6, 2006, Work Session 2/13/06 3 DRAFT COUNCIL MEMBER NIESEN: PROPOSED REVIEW/CHANGES TO CHAPTER 12 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND OCCUPANCY Councilmember Niesen stated she is presenting the following items: terms, mother-in-law apartments, penalties and remedies, and ordinance organization in regard to Chapter 12 of the City Code relating to Building Maintenance and Occupancy. She stated she would like the Housing Commission to review these and return with recommendations. The City Council discussed the difference between homesteaded and rental property. Mayor Kragness stated comments from the Housing Commission would be reasonable. Councilmember O' Connor agreed with Mayor Kragness. COUNCIL MEMBER NIESEN: IMPROVING COMMUNICATION EFFORTS WITH THE COMMUNITY Councilmember Niesen would like the City's Website designed so that people do not have to look so hard for the City Council agenda. It was the consensus af the City Council to postpone discussion on this item. CITY MANAGER EVALUATION WITH MR. LEFEVERE The Council discussed the City Manager evaluation form and arrived at the majority evaluation for each of the evaluation areas. Mr. LeFevere recorded the ratings and will prepare an evaluation form reflecting the City Council majority consensus. AD30URNMENT Councilmember/Commissioner Lasman moved and Councilmember/Commissioner Carmody seconded adjournment of the City Council/Economic Development Authority Work Session at 11:15 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. City Clerk Mayor/President 2t13/06 4 DR�1FT City Council Agenda Item No. 7b City o f Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Man r FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk l DATE: February 22, 2006 SUBJECT: Licenses for Council Approval The following companies/persons have applied for City licenses as noted. Each company/person has fulfilled the requirements of the City Ordinance governing respective licenses, submitted appropriate applications, and paid proper fees. Licenses to be approved by the City Council on February 27, 2006, are as follows: RENTAL Initial 3201 67th Ave N Juha Rouvinen NONE 630I Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434 FAX (763) 569-3494 www.cityo fbrooklyncenter.org City Council Agenda Item No. 7c City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community MEMORANDUM DATE: August 16, 2004 TO: Michael McCauley, City Manager FROM: Todd Blomstrom, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Resolution Approving Change Order No. 3, Improvement Project No. 2004-14, Contract 2004-H, Shingle Creek Parkway and Summit Drive Improvements On May 9, 2005, the City of Brooklyn Center entered into Contract 2004-H with Hardrives, Inc. for completion of the Shingle Creek Parkway and Summit Drive Street and Utility Improvement project. Over the course of construction, additional work items were necessary to address construction related issues resulting from field conditions encounter during the construction process. These additional work items are itemized on the attached Change Order No. 3. Change Order No. 3 includes the cost for repairs of irrigation systems along Shingle Creek Parkway and Summit Drive. Nonresidential properties located along the project corridor are required to have irrigation systems based on the City's Building Maintenance and Occupancy Ordinance. Sections of these existing irrigation systems were removed and replaced to allow for the reconstruction of curb and sidewalk as part of the City improvement project. Record plans for the existing irrigation systems were not available to allow staff to include the replacement of irrigation systems in the original contract bid. There was not an effective method for field locating irrigation lines based on a search of City records and discussions with owners of commercial properties located along the project corridor. Staff determined that the most cost effective method of repairing the existing irrigarion systems was to perform the work on a time and materials basis as described in the proposed change order document. Change Order No. 3 also includes the cost of $1,080 for custom fabricated signs that were provided to assist in guiding vehicle traffic through the construction corridor during partial closure of streets within the work zone. To date, the total change order amount for Contract 2004-H is $56,749.66. This amount represents less than 3 percent of the original contract amount. Attached for consideration is a City Council resolution approving Change Order No. 3 for the Shingle Creek Parkway and Summit Drive Improvement Project, Contract 2004-H. 6301 Shingle Creeh Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall TDD Number (�63) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434 FAX (763) 569-3494 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 3, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2004-14, CONTRACT 2004-H, SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY AND SUMMIT DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, Hardrives, Inc. of Rogers, Minnesota was instructed to complete additional work as itemized on Change Order No. 3 for Contract 2004-H; and WHEREAS, said additional work was not included in the original Contract, but was deemed necessary to properly complete construction for the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that Change Order No. 3 in the amount of $32,139.Q6 is hereby approved. 'The revised contract amount shall be as follows: Original Contract Amount 2,038,021.85 Change Order No. 1 3,872.00 Change Order No. 2 20,738.60 Change Order No. 3 32.139.06 Revised Contract Amount 2,094,771.51 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Ci of Brookl Center tY Yn Change Order No. 3 Contractor: Hardrives Inc. January 25, 2006 Address: 14475 Quiram Drive Rogers, MN 55374-9461 Project: Shingle Creek Parkway and Summit Drive Street and Utility Improvements Improvement Project No. 2004-14 Contract No. 2004-H cluded in the unit nce ro osal form or deemed to be extra work The followmg rtems were not in p p p necessary to complete the project according to the intended design. 1. Irrigation Repairs Several properties along Shingle Creek Parkway and Summit Drive were found to have irrigation systems in the boulevard area of the public right-of-way. Most property owners were not able to provide accurate information regarding the location of the systems prior to project bidding. The Contractor hired Magnum Company (time and materials) to repair and reinstall irrigation systems along the project corridor upon completion of street and utility improvements. The total compensation for all labor, materials and equipment for all irrigation system repairs within the project area is $31,059.06 S 2. Adjustment in Contract Quantities Payment Voucher No. 5 includes various adjustments to the contract quantities that were necessary to address conditions that were encountered during the construction process. The Contractor agrees that Payment Voucher No. 5 includes final contract payment quantities for full compensation of all labor, materials and equipment necessary to complete the work items listed below. A. All bituminous driveway pavement patches and paving wark for driveways located within the project B All Common Excavation erformed alon 48 Avenue North p g C. All Zebra Crosswalk White Poly Preformed (pavement markings) D. All Loop Detectors 6' x 6' (traffic signal loop detectors) E. All adjustments for manhole castings 3. Construction Sign Special The Contractor furnished custom fabricated traffic control signs to supplement standard traffic control devices for the project based on requests from local businesses adjacent to the project corridor. The total cost for all labor, materials and equipment to furnish and install Construction Sign Special items for the project is $1,080.00. Page 1 Change Order No. 2 Contract 2004-H August 16, 2005 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 32,139.06 Original Contract Amount 2,038,021.85 Change Order No. 1 3,872.00 Change Order No. 2 20,738:60 Change Order No. 3 32.139.06 Revised Contract Amount 2,094,771.51 CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME The Contract completion date is not changed due to the items noted above. ACCEPTED: HARDRIVES, INC. The undersigned hereby certifies that he/she is an authorized representative of F�ardrives, Inc. (Contractor). The undersigned hereby c�rtifies that he/she has reviewed the final contract quantities for the referenced contract a.s provided in Payment Voucher No. 5 and certifies that acceptance of Payment Voucher No. 5 and Change Order No. 3 shall constitute a waiver of all claims by this Contractor for Extra Work and quantity adjustments for the contract, with the sole exception of potential adjustments directly related to the construction of "Concrete Median Design Special" concrete roadway medians. B ��l'� Y Contractor's Authorize Representative Date: S APPROVED: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER By: City Manager Date: By: Director of Public Works Date: Page 2 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Contract No. 2004-H 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Project No. 2004-14 S Payment Voucher 5 For Period Ending September 30, 2005 Ciry of Brooklyn Cente� to: Hardrives Inc. 14475 Quiram Dr. Rogers, MN 55374 Telephone: 763-428-8886 Amount of Contract: $2,038,021.85 Date Approved: May 9, 2005 Change Order No. 1 3,872.00 Change� Order No. 2 20,738.60 Chan4e Order No. 3 32.139.06 Totai $2,094,771.51 Project Description: Shingle Creek Parkway/Summit Drive Contract Value Less Less Amount of Work:harges 5 Less Net Project Account Per Resolution Certified and Percent Previous Amount Number Number No. 2005-79 To Date )educts Retained Pa�lments Due SCP/S.Dr. Street amoo-a2ooa�a $1,420,999.45 $1,390,365.22 $69,518.26 $1,302,108.58 $18,738.38 CO #1 $1,752.00 $1,752.00 $87.60 $1,664.40 $0.00 CO#2 $11,803.00 $11,803.00 $590.15 $11,212.85 $0.00 CO#3 $32,139.06 $32,139.06 $1,606.95 $0.00 $30,532.1�' Storm $201,495.50 $206,621.10 $10,331.06 $196,290.05 ($0.00) CO #2 $4,980.00 $4,980.00 $249.00 $4,731.00 $0.00 Water $68,424.40 $51,797.10 $2,589.86 $49,207.24 $0.00 CO #2 $3,955.60 $3,955.60 $197.78 $3,757.82 ($0.00) Sanitary $125,420.00 $131,397.60 $6,569.88 $124,366.02 $461.70 Palme�LakeTrail $104,555.75 $106,880.09 $5,344.00 $101,536.09 ($0.00) CO #1 $2,120.00 $2,120.00 $106.00 $2,014.00 $0.00 Heritage Ctr. Park. Lc $117.126.75 $117.366.24 $5.868.31 �111.497.93 ,($0.001 Total $2,094,771.51 $2,061,177.01 $103,058.85 $1,908,385.98 $49,732.18 This is to certiry that work items shown on this statement of work certified herein have been actually furnished for the referenced project in accordance with plans spec�cations approved and that the total work is 98% complete. Date: Ciry Engineer CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER CERTIFICATION This is to certify that, to the best of my knowledge, information belief, the quantities and values of work certified herein are a fair approximate estimate for the period covered by this voucher. Date: I S 1' a�P CONTRACTOR 1 hereby recommend payment of this voucher. Date: Ciry Manager CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Hotd check and call when ready. Send check to address shown above. City �ouncil Agenda Item No. 7d I�emorandum Date: 10 February 2006 To: Michael McCauley City Manager From: Daniel Jordet Director of Fiscal Support Services Re: Statutory Tort Liability Limits Each year the City Council must choose whether to waive the statutory limitations on tort liability. If these limitations are waived, additional insurance should be purchased to cover potential liabilities. To this point, the City Council has chosen not to waive the statutory limitations on tort liability. This has saved the City of Brooklyn Center about 7,000 each year in additional tort liability insurance premium payments. f the tt ched resolution b the Ci Council at the Staff requests consideration o a a y tY next regular City Council meeting. f LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST LIABILITY COVERAGE WAIVER FORM Cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The decision to waive or not to waive the statutory limits has the following effects: o If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no more than $300,OOO.on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all c(aimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $1,000,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city purchases the optional excess liability coverage. lf the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover up to $1,000,000. on a single occurrenee. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to $1,000,000., regard4ess of the number of claimants. If fhe city waives the stafutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision. This decision must be made by the city council. Cities purchasing coverage must complete and return this form to LMCIT before the effective date of the coverage. For further information, contact LMCIT. You may also wish to discuss these issues with your city attorney. Citv of Brookl�rn Center accepts liability coverage limits of from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). Check one: The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. The city WAIVES the monetary {imits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04, to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT. Date of city council meeting Signature/Date Position Return this completed form to LMCIT, 145 University Ave. W., St. Paul, MN, 55103-2044 LMCIT (11/00)(Rev. 11/03) Page 1 of 1 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION SELECTING THE NO WAIVER OPTION FOR STATUTORY TORT LIABILITY WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has an option to waive its protection under the tort liability limitation contained in Minnesota Statutes 466.04; and WHEREAS, the statutory tort limit is 300,000 per individual and an aggregate of $1,000,000 per ineident; and WHEREAS, the City has opted not to waive its rights to limited tort liability in past years and is required to make a declaration of its intention every year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the City does not waive the monetary limits on municipal limit tort liability established by Minnesota Statnes 466.02. Februarv 27, 2006 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City �ouncil Agenda Item No. $a �r b City of Brookl,�n Center A Millennium Community MEMORANDUM DATE: February 22, 2006 TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Todd Blomstrom, Director of Public Works 7�41j SUBJECT: Public Hearings on Improvement Project Nos. 2006-01, 02, 03 and 04, Contract 2006-A, Centerbrook Area Neighborhood Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements Resolution Ordering Improvements and Authorizing Development of Plans and Specifications for Improvement Project Nos. 2006-01,02, 03 and 04, Contract 2006-A, Centerbrook Area Neighborhood Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Improvement Project Nos. 2006- O1 and 2006-02, Contract 2006-A, Centerbrook Area Neighborhood Street and Storm Drainage Improvements to the Hennepn County Tax Rolls 27 2006. The first hearin is to order A senes of two pubhc heanngs are scheduled on February g improvements and authorize development of plans and specifications for Improvement Project Nos. 2006-01, 02, 03, and 04, Centerbrook Area Neighborhood Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements. The second hearing is to consider certification of proposed special assessments for Improvement Project Nos. 2006-01 and 2006-02. All potentially affected property owners have been notified by certified mail of the date of the public hearings and the amount of the proposed special assessments. I. Explanation of Improvements The proposed project includes roadway, storm drainage, and utility improvements for the Centerbrook Area Neighborhood. The project was previously established by the City Council on August 22, 2005 by Resolution 2005-126. On January 23, 2006 the City Council received the feasibility report and called for a public heaxing for February 27, 2006 to consider these improvements. The feasibility report provides a description of the recommended improvements for the neighborhood and an estimated project budget. The proposed improvements can generally be described as follows: 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434 FAX (763) 569-3494 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org 1. Street Improvements including base preparation, installation of concrete curb and gutter and driveway aprons, bituminous paving, installation of street lighting, replacement of street signs, and boulevard restoration; 2. Storm Drainage Improvements including installation of new storm sewers, repair and replacement of existing storm sewers, installation of new and repair and replacement of existing catch basins and manholes; 3. Water Main Improvements including the replacement of existing cast iron water main pipes, installation of new valves, hydrants and fittings; and 4. Sanitary Sewer Main Improvements including replacement of sanitary sewer pipes and access structures. II. Summary Explanation of Assessments Assuming the City Council orders the above described improvements and authorizes development of plans and specifications for Improvement Project Nos. 2006-01, and 2006-02, Centerbrook Area Neighborhood Street and Storm Drainage improvements, it is recommended that the City Council hold a second public hearing to consider certifying special assessments far these improvements to the Hennepin County tax rolls. O�l November 14, 2005, the City Council adopted 2006 special assessment rates for street and storm drainage improvements which include the 2006 R-1 zoned residential rates of $3,038 for street improvements and $940 for storm drainage improvements. Special assessments were ial zoned ro erties located alon the calculated on a ercenta e bas is for the four commerc g P g P P northern portion of Lilac Drive. All of the properties in the project area have received assessment notices specifying these rates. The feasibility report included a preliminary assessment roll identifying 136 properties for s ecial assessment of street and storm draina e s ecial assessment. P g P Public Comments I Some property owners may choose to object to a special assessment; other property owners may choose to appeal an assessment. An objection is typically a concern expressed by the property owner about the amount of the assessment, or perhaps an assertion that they are not responsible for its payment. i An appeal is a legal challenge to the assessment. Property owners must file with the City Clerk a written notice of objection before or at the public hearing, and then follow up with service of notice of appeal on the City and filing with district court. These types of disputes often require both parties to obtain appraisals and review and possibly negotiate assessments, and can lead to legal hearings. Should objections or appeals be filed with the Clerk prior to the public hearing, or should any person appear at the hearing and object to or appeal an assessment, it is recommended that the Council refer any substantive objections to staff for a report back to the Council at a continued hearing. An example might be an issue whereby staff would need to research the history of a particular complaint, and assemble documentation. The Council should consider removing the objected-to assessment from the proposed levy roll and adopting the remaining proposed assessments. If appeals are filed, staff and the City Attorney will advise the Council of options for handling the dispute and the litigation. Payment Options Available to Property Owners Once an assessment roll is adopted by the Council, the owner of each property has the following payment options: 1. Pay the entire amount of the special assessment, without interest, between March 1 and September 30, 2006. 2. From October 1, 2006 to the end of the business day on November 29, 2006, the property owner may pay the total assessment, with interest calculated from October 1, 2006 to the date of payment. 3. If payments are made with property taxes, the first payment will be due with ta�ces in 2007. The total principle will be payable in annual installments for the period stated on the levy roll. Interest is paid on the unpaid balance. 4. Partial prepayments (such as paying half now and certifying the balance) are not allowed under current assessment policy. III. Recommended Council Procedure First Public Hearing to Order Improvements It is recommended that Council receive a staff presentation prior to holding the first public hearing. Following the presentation, a public hearing to consider ordering the Improvement Project should be conducted to receive public comments. Public comments concerning special rin he assessments should be deferred to the second public hearing. A resolution orde g t improvements and authorizing development of the plans and specifications is provided for Council consideration u on closin of the first ublic hearing. P g p Second Public Hearing for Special Assessments After taking action on the first proposed resolution to order the project, it is recommended that the Council then conduct a second public hearing on the proposed special assessments. The attached resolution certifying special assessments for street and storm drainage improvements for Improvement Project Nos. 2006-01 and 2006-02, Contract 2006-A, Centerbrook Area Neighborhood to the Hennepin County tax rolls is provided for Council consideration upon closing of the second public hearing. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING IlVIPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING DEVELOPMENT OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2006-01, 02, 03, AND 04, CONTRACT 2006-A, CENTERBROOK AREA NEIGHBORHOOD STREET, STORM DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center City Council on January 23, 2006 authorized consideration of street, storm drainage, and utility improvements in the area generally described as the "Centerbrook Area Neighborhood"; more specifically described as follows: Ericon Drive from Lilac Drive North to Logan Avenue; Brookview Drive from Ericon Drive to 56`�' Avenue North; Morgan Avenue from 55�' Avenue North to 56�' Avenue North; Judy Lane from Brookview Drive to Ericon Drive; Lilac Drive North from Ericon Drive to 57` Avenue North; and Hillsview Drive from Lilac Drive North to Brookview Drive. WHEREAS, the Council has previously received and accepted a feasibility report for said proposed improvements, as prepared by the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, said improvements are necessary, cost effective and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report; and WHEREAS, the City Council on January 23, 2006 adopted a resolution setting a date for a public hearing regarding the proposed improvements for the Centerbrook Area Neighborhood; and WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the hearing was given and the hearing was held on February 27, 2006, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered all comments, testimony, evidence and reports offered at or prior to the February 27, 2006 hearing; and WHEREAS, the City reasonably expects to spend monies from the Infrastructure Construction Fund on a temporary basis to pay the expenditures described in this resolution; and WHEREAS, the City reasonably expects to reimburse itself for such expenditures from the proceeds of taxable or tax-exempt bonds, the debt service of which is expected to be paid from property taxes, special assessments, or utility fees. The maximum amount of obligations expected to be issued for such project is $547,236.00; and RESOLLTTION NO. WHEREAS, the City Engineer is prepared to develop plans and specifications for said public improvement project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Improvement Project Nos, 2006-01, 02, 03, and 04, Centerbrook Area Neighborhood Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements, are hereby ordered and the City Engineer is authorized to prepare plans and specifications for said improvements. 2. This resolution is intended to constitute official intent to issue taxable or tax exempt reimbursement bonds for purposes of Treasury Regulation 1.105-2 and any successor law, regulation, or ruling. This resolution shall be modified to the extent required or permitted by Treasury Regulation 1.105-2 or any success law, regulation, or ruling. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLLTTION NO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYIl�TG SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2006-01 AND 2006-02, CONTRACT 2006-A, CENTERBROOK AREA NEIGHBORHOOD STREET AND STORM DR.AINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all obj ections to the proposed Special Assessment Levy Nos. 16572 and 16573; and WHEREAS, assessment rolls, copies of which are attached hereto and part hereof by reference, have been prepared by the City Clerk, tabulating those properties where street improvement and stonn drainage costs are to be assessed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. Such proposed assessments, Special Assessment Levy No. 16572 for street improvements and Special Assessment Levy No. 16573 for storm drainage improvements, made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessments levied against it. 2. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years as indicated on the assessment roll. The first of the installments shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 2007, and shall bear interest on the entire assessment at the rate of five and one half (5.5) percent per annum from October 1, 2006 through December 31, 2007. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the certification of the assessment to the County Auditor pay the whole of the assessment, to the City Treasurer, without interest, if the entire assessment is paid on or before September 30, 2006. After September 30, 2006, he or she may pay the total assessment, plus interest. Interest will accumulate from October 1, 2006 through the date of payment. Such payment must be made by the close-of- business November 29, 2006, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If the owner wishes to pay off the balance at some point in the future, such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year i RESOLUTION NO. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Date Mayor I ATTEST: Ci C1erk tY The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof and the following voted against the same: wlaereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. I RESOLUTION NO. 2006-24 .�:?�:�:�:�:�:�I�Y QF �FtQ0�3.1fN .�EhIT�R C�I�TIFI�� ASS�SSM�NT ROI,I. zrnoos�:�:�:�:�:�:�:-:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:=:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:� S �CEAITEl2BR�OK:NEIIaf�F@�RWOQD:;:::::::�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:;:::::�:�:�:::::::: ��'�'���q��' ':p :�:�:�::IMPFiOY�M�NT:PI�OJ�GT:�OQ6-0... :�:���:7�17M:<�QUi�L�INS7AI:C:M�N7S�E�fT�NC11N��4V�X2�i4�PERl�'1D:�}F�:T�fif: �0 �'.1[�ARS:�:�:?::::�:::�:::::::�:�:�:�:�:�: ..l_.. �t�i��:':::�: :::::::::::t�:l��i�#:Y:Ib :::::::::::::�::::::::::::::::::::::l�b�t��5::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�:��'':Y::#:���::::.....�... ........L�... 0211821420021 �5548 MORGAN AVE N 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420022 �5556 MORGAN AVE N 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420023 �5557 MORGAN AVE N I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420024 15549 MORGAN AVE N 16572 $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420025 �5541 MORGAN AVE N I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420026 15533 MORGAN AVE N I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 I $940.00 0211821420027 15525 MORGAN AVE N 16572 $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420028 �5517 MORGAN AVE N 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420029 15509 MORGAN AVE N I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420030 15501 MORGAN AVE N 16572 $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420031 �2121 57TH AVE N I 16572 I $2,056.17� 16573 I $0.00 0211821420032 15650 LILAC DR N 16572 I $5,292.991 16573 $0.00 0211821420033 12105 57TH AVE N N 16572 �$12,249.631 16573 $0.00 0211821420034 �2001 57TH AVE N N 16572 $2,541.211 16573 $0.00 0211821420036 15630 HILLSVIEW RD I 16572 I $3,038.00I 16573 I $940.00 0211821420037 �5624 HILLSVIEW RD 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420038 15618 HILLSVIEW RD 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420039 12204 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 I $940.00 0211821420040 �2124 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420041 12118 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420042 �2112 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 $3,038.00) 16573 $940.00 0211821420043 �2106 BROOKVIEW DR N 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 021•1821420044 12100 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420045 12024 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 $3,038.00I 16573 $940.00 0211821420046 �2018 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420047 �2012 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420048 �2211 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420049 �2205 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420050 2121 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 I $940.00 0211821420051 2107 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 I 0211821420052 �2101 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 I 0211821420053 I2023 BROOKVIEW DR N 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420054 12017 BROOKVtEW DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420055 �2009 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420056 12011 ERICON DR 16572 1 $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420057 �2021 ERICON DR I 16572 $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420058 12101 ERICON DR I 16572 $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420063 12219 ERICON DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420064 �2213 ERICON DR I 16572 $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420065 12207 ERICON DR I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420066 12201 ERICON DR N 16572 $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420067 �2129 ERICON DR I 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420068 12123 ERICON DR I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420069 12117 ERICON DR N 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420072 �5619 HILLSVIEW RD N 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420073 12301 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420074 2 R KVIEW DR 16572 3 038.00 16573 $940.00 229 B 00 0211821420075 12223 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I 940.00 0211821420076 12217 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420077 15607 JUDY LA 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420078 15601 JUDY LA 16572 I $3,038.00 16573 $940.00 0211821420079 �5543 JUDY LA I 16572 $3,038.00 16573 I $940.00 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-24 ...?�I�'Y �,�BROOkCk.1fN �Ef�TIFI�� i�SS�SS�rM�IVT.RQI,L 2127/20�tifi�: s :�:�:�:C�NT�2gR��K NEIGH$ORW£�QD:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:� P. ......:.�::...:Q IM f�QV�M�N7'. FtQ.l�GT.a�.0.Q6-D. .2. �:�:::::7�F2M:;:EQUAiL;IN$`fA�.LM�N7S: F�!fTENCNNG;O�£�t:i4: P�RI�3D:bF; T��F:('ti}):1f.EARS:::::�: �:':::::��1(1f�#`����:::`:'::':�`St ��'.�t�`��:;:;::;` :�:::::=�ft����'� E� M. C�#�#'Y:tb::::::�::? ::::::::::::::::::::::::s:sAi�ti�i��5::`�s��?'::::s`��:::`�:::s:::::::L��':Y:#:::'::`::`':::�� 0211821420080 5537 JUDY LA 16572 I $3,038.00 16573 $940.00 0211821420081 �5531 JUDY LA I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420082 �5525 JUDY LA 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420083 �5519 JUDY LA I 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420084 �5513 JUDY LA I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420085 �5507 JUDY LA I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420086 �5506 JUDY LA 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420087 �5512 JUDY LA I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420088 15518 JUDY LA I 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420089 �5524 JUDY LA I 16572 I $3,038.00I 16573 $940.00 0211821420090 (5530 JUDY LA 16572 1 $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420091 �5536 JUDY LA I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420092 �5542 JUDY LA 1 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420093 15600 JUDY LA 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420094 �5606 JUDY LA 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420095 �2000 ERICON DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420096 �2006 ERICON DR 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420097 �2012 ERICON DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420098 �2018 ERICON DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420099 12024 ERICON DR I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420100 2100 ERICON DR I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420101 2106 ERICON DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 021�1821420102 �2112 ERICON DR 16572 $3,038.001, 16573 $940.00 0211821420103 �2118 ERICON DR I 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420104 �2124 ERICON DR I 16572 $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420105 12200 ERICON DR 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420106 �2006 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420107 �2000 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420108 �1918 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 I $3,038.00 16573 $940.00 0211821420109 �1912 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 I $3,038.00 16573 $940.00 0211821420110 �1906 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420111 11900 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 I I I I I I TOTAL I$423,156.00� I $124,080.00 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-24 �:I:T:Y:O���ROO�i:YN: �C�MT�R �C�FiTIFI��:�S�S�M�MT:RO�:�::�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�: :�:�:�:�2127/2�6�:-:�:�:�:�:�:-:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:� ���'�':CEN:T:ERgRO�K �NEI�HBCJRWEfQD: ::P a :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::IMPf�OY�AA�NN7'....i�0:l�G3:�...Q6�Q...&....2.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.-.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�. 7EFtM �QllAL INS s::::'. t ���...5 ��tll�.... ��`��'.��:��::Ib���:s�':``::��'::::::�:s:��::'.:::�::::'• �'dk`t�55:::��::�:::::::::::�::::::::�::��:E�'i(:#:::�:::::::::�`E��#``:�: ......Q��.l 0211821310002 �5631 HILLSVIEW RD 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821310003 15625 HILLSVIEW RD I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821310004 �2300 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821310005 12306 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821310006 15624 ULAC DR N I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821310007 15630 LILAC DR N I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821310008 2307 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821310009 5618 ULAC DR N 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821310010 15612 LILAC DR N I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821310011 �5606 LILAC DR N I 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 I $940.00 0211821310012 15600 LILAC DR N 96572 I $3,038.00) 16573 $940.00 0211821310013 �5548 LILAC DR N 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821310014 15542 LILAC DR N 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821310015 15536 LILAC DR N I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821310016 15530 LILAC DR N I 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 I $940.00 0211821310017 12418 ERICON DR I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821310018 �2412 ERICON DR I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821310019 12406 ERICON DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821310020 12344 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821310021 �2340 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821310022 �2336 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821310023 12332 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 021.1821310024 �2328 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 I $940.00 0211821310025 �2324 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821310026 12318 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821310027 �2312 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821310028 12313 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 I $940.00 0211821310029 12319 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821310030 12325 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821310031 12331 BROOKVIEW DR 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821310032 �2337 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821310033 12343 BROOKVIEW DR I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821310034 12318 ERICON DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821310035 �2312 ERICON DR I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821310036 12306 ERICON DR 16572 $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821310037 12300 ERICON DR I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821310039 �2325 ERICON DR 16572 $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821310040 12319 ERICON DR I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821310041 12313 ERICON DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821310042 12307 ERICON DR I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821310043 12301 ERICON DR 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821310045 �2413 ERICON DR 16572 $3,038.00 16573 $940.00 0211821310046 12407 ERICON DR I 16572 $3,038.00 16573 $940.00 0211821420002 15601 LOGAN AVE N 16572 $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420007 �5557 LOGAN AVE N I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 I $940.00 0211821420014 15501 LOGAN AVE N I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420015 15500 MORGAN AVE N I 16572 I $3,038.00� 16573 $940.00 0211821420016 15508 MORGAN AVE N I 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420017 15516 MORGAN AVE N 16572 I $3,038.001 16573 I $940.00 0211821420018 �5524 MORGAN AVE N I 16572 $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 0211821420019 15532 MORGAN AVE N I 16572 I $3,038.00I 16573 I $940.00 0211821420020 �5540 MORGAN AVE N I 16572 $3,038.001 16573 $940.00 Page 1 City Council Agenda Item No. 9 MEMO To: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager From: Ronald A. Warren, Planning and Zoning Sp cialist Subject: City Council Consideration Item Planning Commission Application No. 2006-001 Date: February 17, 2006 On the February 27, 2006 City Council Agenda is Planning Commission Application No. 2006-001 submitted by Jim LaValle of SP Brooklyn Center, LLC requesting a Planned Unit Development Amendment and development plan approval for a 10,000 sq. ft. multi tenant retail building at 615 66th Avenue North. Attached for your review are copies of the Planning Commission Information Sheet far Planning Commission Application No. 2006-001 and also an area map showing the location of the property under consideration, various site and building plans for the proposed development, the Planning Commission minutes relating to the Commission's consideration of this matter and other supporting documents. This matter was considered by the Planning Commission at their February 16, 2006 meeting and was recommended for approval through Planning Commission Resoiution No. 2006-001. It is recommended that the City Council, following consideration of this matter, approve the application subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. A resolution outlining the history of the application along with findings and conditions of approval is offered for the City Council's consideration. Application Filed on 1-29-06 City Council Action Should Be Taken By 3-20-06 (60 Days) Planning Coxnmission Information Sheet Application No. 2006-001 Applicant: S P Brooklyn Center, LLC Location: Southeast Corner of 66th and Camden Avenues North (615 66th Avenue North) Request: Planned Unit Development Amendment The applicant, Mr. Jim LaValle on behalf of S P Brooklyn Center, LLC, is seeking a Planned Unit Development Amendment and building plan approval for a 10,000 sq. ft. multi tenant retail building at the southeast corner of 66`� and Camden Avenues North on a 1.284 acre pareel of land addressed as 615 66�' Avenue North. The property in question is zoned PUD/C-2 (Planned Unit Development/Commerce) and is bounded on the north by 66` Avenue with R-3 (Multiple Family Residence Townhomes) zoned property and C-2 (Commerce) zoned property on the opposite side of the street; on the east by C-2 zoned property containing a SuperAmerica station; on the south by PUD/C-2 zoned property containing the Regal Theatre; and on the west by Camden Avenue with R-5 (Multiple Family Residence) zoned property containing the Melrose Gates Apartments on the opposite side of the street. A Planned Unit Development Rezoning from C-2 to PUD/C-2 and development plan approval for a 20 screen, 85, 240 sq. ft. Regal Theatre was approved by the City Council under Resolution No. 98-133 on July 27, 1998. Attached for the Commission's review is a copy of that resolution containing various findings, considerations and conditions of approval for that proposal. The land rezoned at that time consisted of the Regal Theatre site and two other sites along Camden Avenue, one to the north of the theatre, the other to the south of the theatre, which were identified and referred to during this process as "pad site 2" and "pad site 3". Pad site 2 is the parcel currently under consideration in this application (615 66 Avenue North). Condition Na 15 of the City Council's Resolution regarding these sites states in part that "future development of this area is subject to amendment to this Planned Unit Development". Condition No. 16 of the same resolution prohibits future development of pad site 2 and and pad site 3 as "a fast food/convenience food restaurant, a gasoline service station/convenience store, car wash, pawn shop or check cashing operation." At the time of the theatre development, the owner anticipated development on these �ites of sit down restaurants, however, future development was not restricted to that. Other uses allowed in the underlying G2 zoning district, other than those excluded from consideration by the approving resolution, can be considered for development of these sites. This application is in response to those conditions relating to development of this portion of the PUD. As the Commission is aware, the PUD process involves a rezoning of land to the PUD designation followed by an Alpha Numeric designation of the underlying zoning designation. This underlying zoning district provides the regulations governing uses and structures within the Planned Unit Development. The rules and regulations governing that district (in this case C-2) 2-13-06 Page 1 would apply to the development proposal unless the City were to determine that another standazd or use would be appropriate given mitigating circumstances that are offset by the plans submitted by the developer. One of the purposes of the PUD district is to give the City Council the needed flexibility in addressing development and redevelopment problems. Regulations governing uses and structures may be modified by conditions ultimately imposed by the City Council on the development plans. The PUD process involves a rezoning of land and, therefore, is subject to meeting the City's Rezoning Evaluation Policy and Review Guidelines that are contained in Section 35-208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. Also, proposals must be consistent with Section 35-355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, which addresses Planned Unit Developments. Attached for the Commission's review are copies of Section 35-208 and 35-355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. As mentioned previously, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the overall PUD for this area of the city. That resolution contained the various findings and considerations necessary for approving the PUD. These findings and considerations were made given the applicant's use and this amendment is to acknowledge the building aetails and location for another development within the PUD zoning district through an amendment process. Approval of this Planned Unit Development should acknowledge compatibility with the Policy and Review Guidelines of the previously mentioned Section 35-208 and also the provisions of Section 35-355 of the Zoning Ordinance. It is believed that the proposed amendment submitted by the applicant is in keeping with the findings and considerations associated with the original approval. The proposed amendment can be considered consistent and compatible with sunounding land uses in the area. The development plan amendment being submitted will bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed development as provided for in the underlying zoning district. No modifications from the underlying zoning requirements are being sought. It is believed that the proposed use of the property will be, as shown in the site and building plan portion of this report, consistent and compatible with the immediate area surrounding the property as well as uses in the general vicinity. The proposal appears to be a good use of the property in the context of overall development in this area and will be a good long range use and can be considered to be in the best interest of the community. SITE AND BUILDING PLAN PROPOSAL The proposed PUD Amendment calls for a 10,000 sq. ft. multi tenant retail building to be located in the approximate center of a 1.284 acre site adjacent to, and west of, the SuperAmerica gas station/convenience store located on 66`� Avenue North in the vicinity of T.H. 252. ACCESS/PARKING Access to the site is off 66 Avenue North at a shared access with the SuperAmerica property. The property line sepazating the sites is in the approximate center of this access. No other access is being considered. It should be noted that no cross access is being proposed between this site and the Regal Theatre site to the south. Such cross access would be discouraged to prevent cut 2-13-06 Page 2 through traffic from the theatre to 66 Avenue North. A signalized intersection exists at 66` and Camden to handle theatre traffic. Parking for this 10,000 sq. ft. multi tenant retail space is based on the retail parking formula which required 5.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor azea. This results in a requirement of 55 parking spaces. In multi tenant retail centers, no additional parking spaces beyond those required by the retail parking formula are required of restaurant uses which occupy not more than 15 percent of the gross floor area of the building. This means that up to 1,500 sq. ft. of the center can be occupied by restaurant uses without adding additional parking for restaurant seats and employees. As noted previously, fast food/convenience food restaurants are not allowed to be located within the PUD based on the Condition No. 16 of Resolution No. 98-133. Also, per the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, fast food/ convenience food restaurants are not allowed to abut R-1, R-2 or R-3 zoned property including abutment at .a street line. This property abuts R-3 zoned property on the opposite side of 66` Avenue North. A convenience food restaurant is defined in the Zoning Ordinance as "an establishment with over 40 dining seats or in a separate building, whose principal business is the sale of foods, frozen desserts, or beverages to the customer in a ready to eat state for consumption either within the premises or for carry out with consumption either on or off the premises, and whose design or principal method of operation includes both of the following characteristics: 1. Foods, frozen desserts or beverages are usually served in edible containers or in paper, plastic, or other disposable containers. 2. Customer is not served food at his/her table by an employee but receives it at a counter, window, or similar facility for carrying to another location on or off the premises for consumption." The applicant plans to have a coffee shop occupy the east end of the building with a drive up window. If the facility has less than 40 seats it is not considered a"convenience food restaurant". Such a use occupying over 1,500 sq. ft. will, however, require parking based on the seat/employee ratio for over 1,500 sq. ft. There aze 64 parking spaces on the site, nine more than required by the ordinance. Three handicap spaces are to be provided. Access to the proposed drive up window will generally be counter clock wise around a trash enclosure. Angle parking is provided to the east of the drive land to accommodate this traffic flow. It is recommended that a directional sign or signs, be provided to prohibit south bound traffic between the building and the parking area on the east side of the site. The ability to stack vehicles leading up to the drive up window is sufficient to handle the expected volume. GRADIlNG/DRAINAGE/UTILITIES The applicant has provided grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans which are being reviewed by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer who will be providing written comments for these proposals. Parking and driving areas on the site are required to be bound by 2-13-06 Page 3 a minimum of B-612 curb and gutter. This includes driving and parking areas and concrete delineator areas proposed for the site. Storm sewer will serve the site and tie into existing stonn sewer conneeted to a retention pond located on the Regal Theatre site. This pond was sized to handle development within the area and was part of the Regal Theatre grading plan. Water and sanitary sewer mains are located in a 40 ft. wide public easement, 20 ft. of which are on the east end of the proposed site and 20 ft. of which are on the west end of the SuperAmerica site. Water will be tied into that main and service the south side of the building. Sanitary sewer will be connected �o the east end of the proposed building. LANDSCAPING The applicant has submitted a landscape plan in response to the landscape point system used to evaluation such plans. This 1.28 acres site requires 102.41andscape points. The applicant's plan indicates that their proposal has 168.5 landscape points, however, they have not calculated correctly. They provide four shade trees at ten points each, three coniferous trees at ten points each (rather than six points each); five decorative trees at six points each (rather than 1.5 points each); and 137 shrubs at .5 points each (only 25 percent of the total required points, or 25.6 points, can be for shrubs). Given the current plan they would have 91.1 points, 11.3 point short of the minimum. An additional coniferous tree and a few decorative trees or some other combination, should be added to the landscape plan in order to meet our point system requirements. The plan otherwise appears to be appropriate as for location and types of plantings. Proposed shade trees include Northwood Red Maple, Little Leaf Linden, Red Oak or Marshall's Seedless Ash; coniferous trees would be Scotch Pine, Colorado Green Spruce, Black Hills Spruce, or arborvitae; decorative trees would be Service Berry, Thornless Cockspur Hawthorne, Amir Choke Cherry, Flowering Crab Apple or Japanese Lilac; shrubs would be Bush Honeysuckle, Red Twig Dogwood, Compact American Vibertum, Alpine Currant, Spirea, Dwarf Korean Lilac, Shrub Roses, Sea Green Juniper, Savin Juniper or Tawnton Spreading Yew. All appear to be appropriate mixes of landscaping for the site. Amendment to the plan so that the point systern is met should be a condition of the approval of this application. BUILDING The applicant has submitted building elevations showing the proposed multi tenant building. The building exterior would be primarily a prefinished split face block with a contrasting single score smooth face concrete block accent. A decorative drive-it cornice crown in an off white color would skirt the top of the building. A drive-it exterior finish on rigid insulation would be located above the display windows for each of the proposed tenant spaces. A canopy awning over the drive thru window would be located at the east end af the building. LIGHTING/TRASH The applicant has submitted a lighting plan indicating the location of various exterior lighting and the photo metrics indicating foot eandles throughout the site. Six freestanding lights are located around the perimeter of the site and ten wall mounted lights, five on the north elevation, 2-13-06 Page 4 three on the south elevation and one eaeh on the east and west elevations. All lights are to be a cut off type fixture directing light down on the site. The lighting plan appears to be consistent with city ordinances with respect to foot candles and concern that light be directed down on the site and not create glare. The trash container will be located at the southeast eorner of the site and is to be a prefinished concrete block to match the building. The height of the structure is 6 ft. and it contains a solid opaque gate. PROCEDURE As pointed out previously, this proposal is an amendment to the Planned Unit Development approval granted at the time of the Regal Theatre Planned Unit Development proposal. As a Planned Unit Development, the proposal is required to follow the procedures followed for the original Planned Unit Development. This requires a public hearing, which has been scheduled. Notices of the Planning Commission's consideration have been sent and a notice has also been published in the Brooklyn Center Sun/Post. All in all, we believe the plan is in order and consistent with the original development plan approval and, therefore, we would recommend approval of the amendment. Approval of this application should acknowledge the findings, considerations and conditions that are comparable to those made at the time the City Council approved the original Planned Unit Developrnent. A draft Planning Commission Resolution is offered for the Commission's consideration. 'This resolution outlines the Commission's consideration of the matter and also recommended considerations and conditions for approvaL 2-13-06 Page 5 City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community MEMORANDUM DATE: February 10, 2006 TO: Ron Warren, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Todd Blomstrom, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: 66`" and Camden Avenue Site 615 66 Avenue North Planning Commission Applications 2006-001 Public Works Department staff reviewed the following preliminary documents submitted for review under Planning Commission Applications 2006-001 for proposed commerciaT development of the vacant lot located at 615 66` Avenue North. Sheet Cl-1, Existing Conditions, dated January 18, 2006 Sheet SP-1.1, Proposed Site Plan, dated January 18, 2006 Sheet C3-1, Grading Plan, dated January 18, 2006 Sheet C3-2, SWPPP Plan, dated January 18, 2006 Sheet C4-1, Utility Plan, dated January 18, 2006 General Site Lavout The applicant is proposing to develop Lot 2, Block 1, Regal Road Development 2" Addition. The preliminary site plan generally proposes the construction of a commercial type building with paved parking area and space for a drive-through window. The following recommendations regarding the preliminary site plan are provided for consideration. 1. The development site is subject to drainage and utility easements as dedicated with the final plat for Regal Road Development 2 Addition. City records indicate that the site is also subject to public easements dedicated to the Village of Brooklyn Center pursuant to an easement document dated April 26, 1961 and recorded with Hennepin County. The applieant shall confirm that the proposed building does not encroach into existing easements. 2. The applicant is proposing to install portions of parking lot, paved surfaces and site improvements over areas subject to existing drainage and utility easements. The applicant shall be aware that the City of Brooklyn Center will not be liable for damages if any such improvements constructed within existing easements must be removed in order for the City to exercise its easement rights. This may occur if the City must perform routine maintenance or emergency repairs. to exisring water and sewer mains located within easements that extend along the eastern boundary of the site. 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434 FAX (763) 569-3494 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org th 3. A portion of the southeast curb line at the intersection of Camden Avenue and 66 Avenue North appears to encroach into tHe site by approximately 1-foot based an the survey information provided by the applicant. A portion of the existing sidewalk along Camden Avenue North also appears to encroach into the proposed development site. The applicant has indicated that the owner is willing to dedieate a street and sidewalk easement to the City on the condition that the easement dedication would not adversely affect the existing building and parking lot setbacks for the site. 4. Vehicle access to the site is restricted to the existing shared driveway access onto 66 Avenue North. The applicant shall provide a copy of a recorded share access agreement prior to issuance of a building permit for the site. 5. The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide additional dimensions specifying the width of proposed parking spaces. Parking space dimensions shall meet or exceed the minimum standards provided in City Ordinance Section 35-702. 6. The applicant shall construction concrete curb and gutter along the perimeter of all driveways, parking lots, parking spaces and paved driving surfaces. Curb and gutter shall be constructed in accordance with the dimensions of Type B-618 or B-612 as per City design standards. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for coordinating site development plans with Xcel Energy, CenterPoint Energy, Quest Communications and other utility companies. Water and Sanitarv Sewer Utilitv Service Water and sanitary sewer utility services are provided to the proposed development site from existing water and sanitary sewer mains extending along the eastern property line. The following recommendations are provided for consideration. 1. City record plans indicate that the existing water main located along the eastern property boundary is a 6-inch diameter water main. The Utility Plan shall be revised to indicate the carrect water main size and a reduction in the proposed water service to a 6-inch diameter DIP service and gate valve. 2. Unless otherwise required for fire flow capacity, the water main connection shall be cornpleted by means of wef-tapping and installation of an approved service saddle. All water main exposed or installed as part of the service extension shall be polywrapped in accordance with City standards. 3. The Utility Plan shall be revised to show the installation of a precast concrete manhole at the connection point between the existing sanitary sewer and proposed sewer service. Tracer wire and a tracer wire access box shall be installed along the proposed sanitary sewer service in accordance with City standards. shall meet i of Brookl Center desi standards. The location 4. Utili service extensions C tY tY Yn and method of connection to the e�sting water and sanitary sewer mains shall be subject to approval by the Supervisor of Public Utilities. 5. The proposed site plan shall be subject to the approval of the City Fire Chief and Building Official, including hydrant spacing requirements and any other requirements of the Fire Department. Storm Water Management During construction of the Regal Theater site, a 15-inch diameter storzn sewer was extended from the southern boundary of the proposed development site to the existing storm water management pond located adjacent to Highway 252. This service stub is intended to provide a drainage outlet for the praposed development. A copy of the utility conshuction plan for the Regal T'heater site is attached to this memorandum. 1. The Utility Plan and Grading Plan currently show proposed storm sewer from the site extending east and connecting to existing storm sewer within the Super America site. The storm sewer within the Super America site was not designed to convey storm water runoff from the proposed development site. The Utility Plan and Grading Plan shall be revised to include the installation of a storm sewer connection to the existing 15-inch diameter storm sewer stub located along the south property line of the site. 2. The existing storm water pond located within the Regal Theater site is designated to provide storm water runoff rate control and water quality treatment for the proposed development. Permanent on-site storm water best management practices are not necessary to accommodate the proposed site development. 3. Storm sewer shall be extended to the western edge of the proposed parking lot and at least one catch basin shall be installed along the west curb line to collect runoff from the western portion of the site. 4. Temporary erosion control inlet protection measures shall be placed at all existing and new catch basins located within the site until final pavement and turf restoration work is complete. 5. Erosion control silt fence shall be installed along the perimeter of the property until turf restoration work is complete. 6. An NPDES construction site erosion control permit must be obtained from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. The above comments are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Subsequent appzoval of the final site plans may require additional modifications or easement dedications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of the water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, gas and electric service, final grading and geometric design as established by public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans. I o..�.�d a f.OPNFR SL1TF (JNF [Al� �n 1M �m 1 !ro-bf-��N m sw �m6rtd u� �/l I vILKi TO BE /IACFU N 0. 2 M P�MrtNT Mfw S T A T E H 1 G H W A Y I j .�b �,M M.�"`�w^� a.=.,��.0 �un. a �.-�m.m ��c�.rt vrK wx.o� M aaTM .�n¢ I s� .._.-�i"-......._.« att m! B¢ov w 't I_. �jE__'—__ �':c.{;cwrw�`rt'VViw;°9v.' .wo�cxm.�xr.vmvra o w a �wsw�m, ro Mc wa...,m �m. w �`a,�wcw� e m iw�m r .ro .r.c Y i-------_ �,:o, �..m �.r. w Z :;;•.�R;� I., 1 -al4•._-- ��`a k 1 1:..� °m� T ..�M �.n g� a-a a, w..� a 2r m�c' w'� m.• .aw "`,n�" cn i S c �'s ruw w�uix wi w m u i°fl`YfPH 4 I ,a a 1 C �y� f. m^vrt"�ro mt on y i Y p �iwn rwirw a`im t a n.a r K :mis n,e we� t*1 .a aoan rl I' N I I ia=tra: e �i Y -u n'•. 1 l ��.z._.,.� w V r-r r s -t d rz t �"I ,r�o.�,x �ae� w m.�- S\ ?C r m t "°s w r-'r� I 1 1 �a.an.�r o oonue.�m m M r-.a• �t c .ara.,mwlwwc r a m 1 .�un .o..4r i- �..n.. ,,,o. n� o-r s a ne Y �-.�r..e y 1 m�o�c� n .s�i V M-� f K tN�f t-W.f aY-�' ht n�� l\ WT�ioi� O[v. {Jll� y (ri] M p j �LOOt a fK H O� IoGR K �p� �y OM ��vy.� 4 7 1 G f 1 1 8� fY-al' N lio n 1 T p r Y� u �qyµ,yl�y��. Y�rw axu l� Z J s+ a BtW ��..c tr� g� A '.N �3D8F a. p l. m e w•%. o. t�,' �'ioo."` -v 1 .�t, m j� s r. m.- a n e sr �s. w..e v. w n 2 Koe�iM TW�I[•Wm •i :�1� llt� M 4�iL 'L �E �uim �v K m r o q s P.�� v� J �ne� w �y (r �C i� m�O�a. }.y r' y u i a n� t�wu� �._L 11.4� 1 C 2'7l T IMC A m l i ^t .'�t F/f-- —Nf3R8h__4— -�yL- a` xc rv�a r a I Y J a s J 1 f .mw.c. u.: �nK�c ,e m�im•r.mxi a�m w�o .wrwx i wx w�c �nw. M rnmm� wrnsm�u rw �u.�aa. �a i� uW-ue�n :m^` aa wo xwum ru r�r ua�.00in u� ��w`°.'��"w:..u. �n�,» m.��`�p1iib�sc��'"m�nc �i. m+nuna cmmx.x w wi.�w. ms,'.° �x r' m�«c ma i 9 I »•'a Maa �u av un ieic:w� �i�e ia mi+s7 �.nuwa (lana+� UtWb Netw xrox�xt m[ r r .oa M e um ME COHiRKt00. SNNl 1£PoiY ML Ew51W0 NIp1bHf FWQt M LM151NUC1iW ..ul GiCn BASn C�S1wG5 M GJ118 4�K1 BE SuNP[D 0.1� GEET Mq i ML STOnu YnEF f6N1fD dG5 9UU1 BE WSLLLLID MM 9FEVYZ Cd.IMS I NIO N011(Y TfE OYMflI Of N1T OFiFflENLES MNYIdF CA91M64 N P�KD I.RE.�S SNN1 BE AMGED GOS iFET. �YQ�WIIi IpN pEVAllWY W RI?�5 RVtECT iK AIMVlD [lFV�11p15. Pou ElLVniron /DNSMGR Y�T P[OURE PUIOVK qt 1DGlICW 0� RCtIOMS �ME55 OT�EFMSE 1101FD. NL MAIERNS. C�14T. 1EOfNIWES IMO IESMG SMNl CONpQiE MJJSlYE1�T 11WE5 9�q1LD BE R1SiNlID M1M I. Yli. Gf MIU YAIt Of 6. wrsaw ro n�c iaee m. or m[ 'sr,�w++Ww umira v[anc�nans ra+ ruicx wi. casmuc� siui aruonw ro �acu wi[s. ru sraw Qxcrt c.,ra er.sHS. urm a.w�M.wrus. �xo uuwncs s�nu x YNx AND SFAN[E ll1E WST�LL�IKM NR! SMptNtY SEY�fII MIO STqW RxQt {B' W qNKiEl1 EsCEPI itlt IIK fOLLOMNfs in5ti.wliW !Y P2 Ott E_ wS5IXS�110x Oi wW.' .wD 10 M[ ME WuiN�CiUR SN.W. �Ex�F't ln[ 1OG11W NN E�EV�tiW Uf dISTNC 'STM�DNm 9'Et]f1CAlp11 fOP MQIWAT CQ�SAIUCTON' NxM. OfPI. K fllu3.. U161AE5 NO NVOCPWINCK iF�TMES mIN TIE OW+EPS N�D fl[1D-HAV'! OS N¢VOwG TQ CURIIENT MOCNOW. TK CON1RKiqi 9�ML BE PPip1 tt1 COxSIPUCMM. MC LOxiR�CTOR SXML %ufp�RLY MOl1iY 1HE NCOUINEO 10 ip1M Nl PPOCEOIMCS AS QIRMED BY ME LOCK �MCY. p1QNFd OF INY p501FPHiQCS qi VAqA➢ONS FROY VlNl. �Nn-22 SEE WCN. iLAN fOR [%ACT BLDG. LOL�i1W. RE 9R R.W fM UYWf dMEM5qt�5. ME CIXIIXACTd1 41NL CWPOin�IE PK LOCallpl b' ML SNNl UfiINR fBH„-I! !1' �ce�w-�s eo• sca�xc charr ioc�noxs ro ec coonwu.� rnTM nc ,wa�rtcr. aw.�c ws. nccmic. um a�ccHOn[ wM mc ix�u urutt cw�-�� ao' KRiFY FsI5YN0 MWt1 IOC. t FIEY. PPoqt� IO BFGWWNG GWS1RlIClIW BE ME�Na9iBlE FOR 1ME COqlqHA11CN C&u,-1] !O' Of Cp10Ui MST4IAAW N! �CCMO/u�CE ME IF.M1nG MMXJiAGNXER [gNi�-1] 00' I n mE w�Rn wut� 9�i.0 BE MiN,t1D �nM MK of ).3 FT. M fAKP. mE uy SidW WT-NS iC En51ixG Cnlfi B�SWM�� STxuCNRES SHNL a�'� 60' CW11iACldi 41NL 1£MfY ME qTT AS-BIM1t CWIStRVC110N K/�x5 TO CMG g[ S�tM NT di CQK OFILLCO. PPOIE<MM OF ME Ex151WC UIIIIlIFS I IACAIION 1«C Y�IFNIK 11PE IS 1K flE5^1M90YlIY OF 1NE Cp11PAC1pR n�y 5(aPx SEVmt PVE 6HNL BE QASS S UMlE55 OMER1n5E b01m. �CN1pACTqt TO KNYY SERNCE �OC�TOnS Ptdpt 10 LRISIXUCTOt4 E8�OS4 ME CW1R�[10N 41N1 COMT.Kf �GOPMEX SI�IE �ME LNL� fOR Ny p�lEp MNn i0 BE 2�55 !1 KL w EN wHH V�aC. lIl1WC5, NID SnMIM� SEV.fN M�Dlti+li5 TO 8E W1A�E0 vlifl� 6!h V0.vElwttENE vnM !Mm wntEP i q �OP uip1T' LOC�liMS PNCN TO uttliY �RiM1ATOn. OKln.VP[0 JWII& gF p[uK�fIXl PL.v� fOR EASPNG Uriltx MWViLATONi N19 w/vµK —r—�i ME CWIP�CId1 SnNl COxIMt'WPNEp SiAII ONE C/ll� fOR Wry1RACTq1 t0 �fHfY VdYO RCPES /�NO t�EiD M.u9f MpONi 10 SiOPU SCViFA i NR uTUTY LoC�1Wn5 PF�dt M UIYItt MSiM1�TM CONfOPU i0 OFSIRI fAMNG Of YQVO ROPE. M KPYY BlntqNG SEXNCES 9ZE MID LOC�MM W1N ENOMFFA n �xD MQYIECi PPiUP f0 CONSiP1IClld1. m( REh5��15^_T_. �ua+amw t,' WBStW��o� (:s:%��:A'.;f Y. �.._.�a. P y o.lE• il I /J�yjX '�a� i f Centres Grou Brookl n Center, LTD.1 Re�e! uca��r r�� �E� y �e��e �/•W�] PEG M 5E5 h; 4 y M��� Debra Ailstrom introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY COU�ICIL RFSOLUTION N0. 98-133 RESOLUTION REGARDING RECOMI��NDING DISPOMI�D BY PL,�►NNIl�iG CO1vIlVIISSION APPLICATION N0. 980I5 SLTB CENTItES GROUP BROOKLYN CENTER, LTD. .��,g� planning Corrimission Application 130. 98015 submitted by Centres Group Brooklyn Center, LTD. proposes rezoning from C 2(Commerce) to PUD/C 2 of 730,192 sq. ft.� (16.76 acres) area of land that is bound�d on the north by 66th Avenue and the Super west b Caznden America site; on the east by TH252; on the south by Interstate 694; and on the y Avenue; and ��T�RF,AS, this proposal compreh�nds the reznning of the. above mentioned property and site and buildi.ng plan apgroval for an 85,240 sq. ft., 4,592 seat, 20 screen theat�r on� a proposed I3.09 acre site and the r�,reation of two other sit�es, one that is 71,693 sq. ft. in area and the other 88,18b sq. ft. in area for future commercial devclopment, �most l�.cely restaura,nt uses; and ��p,g the planning Commission held a duly called pu'blic hearing on June 25, 1998 when a staff report and public testimony regardi.ng the rezoning and site and building plan were reeeived and the Piannina Commission continued the gnblic hearing arid refeired the application to the Northeast �Neighborhood Advisory Group for revi�w and comment; and FT�,�'�2RAS the Northeast Neighborhood Advisory Group met to consider this_ matter on July 7, 1998, at the City Ha11 and recommended aPProval of this •planned unit development proposal; and W]r�AS, the Flanning Commission reswmed consideratian of tbis matter on July 16, 1998, nceived an additional staff rcPort and took fiu t�stimony during a condnued public hearing; and �;�3�, P1ann�n� Commission recommended approval of Application No. 98015 by adoptiag Planning Comasission Resolution No. 98-3 on July 16, 1998; and WI�tEAS, the� City Counc� considered Application i�To. 98015 at its 7?�ly 27, 1998 meeti,ag; and �11�REAS, the City Council considered the rezonina and site and buildi.ng Plan request in light of all tesmnony received, the guidelines for evaluatiag r�zonings contained in Section 35 �08 of the City's �Zoning, Ordinan�e,� the provisions of thc Planned LTnit Development 1 City Council Resolution No. 98-133 ordinance contained in Sectiaa 35-355, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the Planning Commission's recommendation contained in Planning Comrnission Resolution Iata: 98-3. NOW, T'I�RF.F4RE� BE TT RFSOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center �that Application No. 98015 subnnitted by Centres Group Brooklyn Center, LTD. be approved in light of the following considerations: 1. The rezoning and planned unit dev�lopment proposal are compati'ble with the standards, purposes and intent af the Planned Unit Development section of the City's �Zoning Ordinan�e. 2, ��g and.p],armad unit devclopment groposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as. well as .those permitted on� 'surrounding land. 3. The utilization of the property as ProPosed under the rezoning and planned unit devolopment p=oposal will conform witli City ordinance st:andards with the exception of the parking requircment for theaters which requires ane parldng space �or every three seats witl�in the theater complex. Variation from the Zoning prdinan.ce to allovy a pazking fonnula of one pazking space for every four theater seats is justified on the basis of the development plan submitted a.nd the oPerational differences on p�rldng dcmand that a multiplex theazer of this size has whic,h allows tlie ability to sta;ger starti�ng times within the theater complea to tessen ar spread oui thc dcmand for pazking over a grcater period of time: The applicants havc also provided a parl�ng analYSis tt�t indicatcs national norms, local norms, parking• generation, and local pazldng studies aIl con�lude that tlie stanclard.of one parking space for every four seats is a reasonable standard to apply to t�iis proposed theat.�s comple.c: 4. Tb.e rezoning and planned unit development praposal.are considered compati'ble with the recommendations o� the City's Comprehensive Plan for tlus area of the City. 5, 'The rezoning and pianned unit development appear to be a good ntilization of the properry under considerarion and the future potential uses of two actjac� propertics for commarcial i�staurant sites is also a good long range use of the existing laad and can be considerai an asset to the community• 2 ;=i a. City Council Resoluuon No. 98-133 i• 6. In light of.the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for �valuating rezonings and contained in Section 35 208 of the City's Zonina Ordinance are met and tlzat the proposal is, therefore, in the best interests of the cominunity. gg TT FiTRTHER RESCILVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to appmve �ppli,�ation No. 98015 subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. The buildung plans aze subject to reyiew and approval by the Building Official with =espect to applicable codes prior to the�issuance of pemaits. 2, Grading, dravnage and ut�ity plans aze. subject to review and approval by tha C�ty Engineer prior to the issuaace of permits. 3. A site perfo�mance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost, cstimates shall be submitted prior to the �issuance of bulding permits to assure campletion of al� approved site improvements. 4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftap or on ground mechanical equipment sbiall be�appropriately screened from view. T• S. The� buildings are to be equipped with an autom.atic fire extin,°uishing SYstem to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central mon�toring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 6. An� underground irriaation system shall be installed in all landscaped. areas to� facilitate site maintenance. 7. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the �City Ordinances. 8. B612 curb and gutter sball be provided azound all pazking and drivi�ag azeas. rovements and. 9. The applicant shall submit an as built sunrey of th�. property, imP utility service lines prior to release of �the perfoimance guarantee• 10: The property owner shall enter into an easement agreement for maintenance and insgection of utility and storm drainaDe syst�ams, prior to the issuance of permits. 11._ All work performed and materials useci for canstruction of utilities shail conform to the City of Brooklyn Center standard specifications and details. 3 r Ciry Council Resolution No. 98-133 12. Approval of this application is subject to th� agpl�cant complying with all of the ations of the West Mississi i Watershed Management requirements and regul PP Commission with respect to this site. The storm drainage system shall be acceptable to the. Watershed Management Com�mission and the applicant shall comply with any conditions imposed by that�body priar to the issuance of building permits for this project 13. Ponding azeas required as part of the storm drainage plan shall be protected by approved easemen� The easement document� shall be executed and filed with Hennepin County prior to the issuance of building permits. 14. The applicant shall enter into a deveiopment agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to.the issuance of building permits. Said agreement shall aclmowledge a pazking ratio of one pa�ang space for every four seats in the multiplea theater and shall aclmowledge all conditions of approval and ass�n comgliance with development plans submitted by the.applicant 15. The area identified on the site pian as "pad, site 2" and "pad site 3" shall seeded in. a man�ner to allow appropriate maintPU�e of this property pending future development Fut�ure development of this area is subject to amendment to this planned unit development. .16. Thz applicant has a�eed and the City. a�knowled�es that it will not allaw the development of °pad site 2" and "pad site 3" as a fast €oodlconvemence food restaurant, a gasoline service station/convenience store, car wash, pawri shop or check cashing operation and the development agreement will ackaowledge tbis restriction .or limitation on the future use of the property. 17. The construction and cost of all �affic control impmve,ments related to 66 Camden Avenues due to the .Pm.l�t shall be the respons��ty of the app including, but not limited to, traffic signal, median emension, traff'ic control �tructures and any necessary right-of-way. This shal� be acknowledged in the development a�re�ment. 18. Vehicle access between ih� theater Pa�l and the proposed Lot 3, Block 1,.Rega1 Road Development Addition and b�tv�ieen the thcater parcel and the Super Ainerica P�P�Y P��bi�.. The applicant sball provide a physical basrier, acceptable to the City, to prevent such cross access. 4 1" �.t- i 1 City Council Resolution No. 98-133 T�a' Ji�v 27. 199R Dati °r 4C.�iLt/?.dYJ /11:ci���"�-- ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoin; resolution was duly seconded by member Kathleen Carm�nd upon vote being�takcn th�reon, the following voted in favor xhereof: I�fyrc�a Kragness, Ks.thleea CarmodY,. Debra Hilstrom, Ray Lasmar►, az�d Robert Peppe; and the following voted against the same: n� whereupon said iesolution was declared duly Passed and adopted. 7.• ..i i i 5 �,'/i i-��y� r� .`�:�:i.; �2% :a l�t',� �'tt •'t5 I�t. S�r;,��r�� �ti•:. .�i;r il �c,• Tv, f•':�F _i� ��.:�1.•.-.•� ��-�"r.•"`�•;.��, _•t.: '!A!-i �ar� .t i ,�cr �G x, 1�'s`''s. -�`�a."":,: r• 1 Z:'t..-.2 t 7 =.r`�: `+��:'�;i?' Z�i%"-' •R,-ck.. Y.-;`:: -'t'�.i� 'l,+ t`'�'.'f,•' ��t��.."•.� �S' i> i ,f•• f ��1 �t ;�.r fq%�.::1' �'S �Z c�: t1'_� R �u.^��;i� �r y •-Y_ ,4 f r t 1 'Kr. L, r'�� u' -,�«:�i :i2� �i i�,.: }j }��i; t ;g. i �i:�;l S� fi� �s s 1 j T_G :.C i ��?rt `.:G+i. S.• ;.�t:: T. o� t •t2 i: }•'ti�.11 }�.t.4, 'iL. ^l{;:: �:.v r�_r.; ;2::: ��r.;��r� I C k w� r% �'i,'r::... r�:: xo:rl v �.��s-: .1t.��"f '�Y �F� 'I �l c I `r.. s.. r �a.-�c �f.l 4. I��_ 'AN: ...ti= ;r. .J r�� ��;_,1:�: 1 r:. y t. ,:Tsy^ l� r�.c.\�"�i r .r. y v �%`'=G i=c;.' 4 3. �'s�: ie:. Mf' r 1 r� �t c ,r n� .<t :�i �=i r c. J., 'r'� r .�?a�1: N r e; ,.;12! .a:� .�,.t�,t�?':'���, 1 a ,c �i�'`; '�'i c .rr,.�� `�:?''lie "�:`�lj`i ;F:%i i j I `F r ♦tI yYi 1` T~�� a. l i a 1 .�-:��<;:�-�_-r �i �'f.?h''� ;'r. �c�._„2('.;Y�:iy: �j 3'� r-:a� �.r��� :,F� i L• "t ,,`-i S C,- 4; rZ 4 ''1`" •c' `<1. �R.,_*:: I' t r� �ttw i. V t�. �,��v r� F `Y'Co �I 1 f �-�t .,,E 1� r i �i-. y t, "S rn i S`ti� r- =r�.;i y.: '��"t� 'c?'�`'�-. ..f" �'l.cri ,.,c'..4. i� �•iir•�f' I A i ����..i 'h'� �it•'-C'; ��J 1 y r�i. l��l �:�i.> "7 --Y: f?i:�. f i• c Z f 71� ��/S rr C V' v�.� f F^-:A .;.,Y t� t� rt'=� r y i 1.- 2. t� L. t'� �c. •,i �t-. �_l C1 �.-�'-�r'N,�?��TF'�X`;�^i'�.ijl ,��_r .4� i t S n h�;. 1 r: i;. rr '�S..L i `l+: �t. »-1 :2`'.', �`:��:f_ir�� .��9.�:.:��jY� y ti�'� y �l'' L �.�r 1�:� S^ l.l� Ni.'.1.}�'1�a't'�� 7 :7t��: �i i �J�:�!r..��' -n.`\i� c`����.. 2_�� 1 TE:_t:. 1� i::'2: _.1='x .w'' i''_; .':Y� �<�ji�-�a' .:t.?..-rii;, ..i' i ;r.C '.�`�'.1`,.`GJ�1��+i.c '�a�+ �i``1'h A I� a f�� k a.,�, s..&. x .,�,s*, g `r t� r r ad i �6, .'L�� ,�i 3 s ,y„ b 3 s 3 �e x �m� ���.a�� 'S� Q i �s&''z .a r ��,.5. ,�a z c<�e R k t� w ;++*�+k a� 1 a j 3 .k k r �'n d� �3+ 3A l� w�"� t "-w.s` r y f r iy 3 n-.... �rv 5. t� �r x r k` -+gy �r c `t �e'� 4 Y n a c..�' a �e t aa 5 1 ���s x �s"°aP 4 s �i 1 m �t T ��t C'�� �i �F 6'4� g 3 s t f� y� f �xui��� r 4�'.� i �tie:c. �p e,>._� z �p }��:"§�"`k s y'.q m e i, i ��a t f s$` t J 'DS� Y y�� ysd�no-����c q 2 'n. RA ��ye �``�`k� 1 �c �C s��i `a� c �s'� '5,� II t t� "�m A� k �6` 3 QE �q �A. �.�.��ti r�a 'R,�� Is�'�` c .����t ��Si 9a ��d.0 '3 'AY1 ^F t 1 �e....� v�. Y 1 >"ai E R'`� y,.fp��y s'c :a A 7 e -F �s�'� f'E `h�` .y' c� �E �,..aa� w^N�: ,e`� 1 1 vf v- S i E �g. �&4� a a j a� a s t& a x t ti.,.., c...� f a�+'.� u.w" G W 5 z� �a i� '�tt �s k^_ g a�E �.:;e 3 ���`i i e��J�� Yst �i� a� ,..70�.« 1FS� t �H 3� t� '"1� T�"" y :SC.; t a a 4,�4 f I c: l� �9k.� 5e����i�#� 2.. 4i�;�e ���1 t ,F� t 3 ,i x eS"� is s- g� e e' r,� f t� j �e� i z ��v y 1 e �"'i� S --'Ti .G,�' Y f k a �rR 2 j i f'"` 5 t" ��1 S �ep' k R i T w �'�"�r f a g f x y x E r 71Fi� ,�,�._.c.� �,i I .3 F S� b k x s t 1 s M 0. 'e �3 r� ����''S �t k 's E t Y` `n, d` 'aw 4-- ...r' n,.� t'e�" £.�..AL�'�e g p �i a �.-�M.. 4, ��'�5..'.�..�� �,+�^."'"*�k" rtt� t s ������t�i s c 'ar"«..�.," .s �nr� ""'c"„� st tc 1`y�°4& 8 E� j� 4 t 5 f s v` e 4 a g r �,,,y��k.. �u j e k 3 n �s� y �3Ak�.€�'� 4��d�.�_ t�„'�'� d r.?r :r y 3 ep �Y f rt` k 4 j� Y d 4.� s. s.� s 8.� a r� i� k tl FI�. ��y y� S t aY' N t 3 1 E F ,�r x u„ s��t. e r �,x��:a" f e t �l ��f t C n c z ���`t g F yh b t t I t a a t x f �„LS w� j k a 'Y��✓ i..� r f r b a�i� s t '"titie r y t �p ++�tx�s C� ���.r� 4 4�5 a t x� �y' t L r r� S x r a 3� r �+a+�u' �a-: i Q� .,Y t �a a k�,�� d..�� 1- �r� �t br r� �x 3 g a`�� �t �'-�"�y�. a z t r -.r�.,_ f j �4 �c �.��a'�F a t'r�?����'� �°'a.F tA 2�� x'�� rr' �i f r i r� r a s i k �.�{`u' r'�'� I° 1 n"°° �k� 1 a r ,r� �d i JR�. �s a:. i k m?' 1 m�+��^' t l f �'a �,r` I i �t 'i �e j j 6�� �"`a:� t S,F-� u 1.3 I r a 5 `v�`�"'� ;�_a-�^ .�r��7 �`t.� z r 4 8� '�yr x A�.r... Fp "s "anv� �k .�.,3s."` ..�.i. .�#k� .r,�a?� �ie� x a� �,K h q i;� P ..aa' E�':�: E s} i �s:�. .,y�.� r� r� �s t t.'��"�' �b.�� '�ro�..,,� �,-a�,Y,,..,.,,.,,�, -,.t Section 35-208. REZONING EVALUATION POLICY AND REVIEW GUIDELINES. 1. Puroose The City Council finds that effective maintenance of the comprehensive planning and land use classifications is enhanced through uniform and equitable evaluation of periodic proposed changes to this Zoning Ordinance; and for this purpose, by the adoption of Resolution No. 77-167, the City Council has established a rezoning evaluation policy and review guidelines. 2. Policv It is the policy of the City that: a) zoning classifications must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and b) rezoning proposals shall not constitute "spot zoning", defined as a zoning decision which discriminates in favor of a particular landowner, and does not relate to the Comprehensive Plan or to accepted planning principles. 3. Procedure Each rezoning proposal will be considered on its merits, measured against the above policy and against these guidelines which may be weighed collectively or individually as deemed by the City. 4. Guidelines a. Is there a clear and public need or benefit? b. Is the proposed zoning consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use classifications? c. Can all permitted uses in the proposed zoning district be contemplated for development of the subject property? d. Have there been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area since the subject property was zoned? e. In the case of City-initiated rezoning proposals, is there a broad public purpose evident? f. Will the subj ect property bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed zoning districts? g. Is the subj ect property generally unsuited for uses permitted in the present zoning district, with respect to size, configuration, topography or location? City of Brooklyn Center 35-4 City Ordinance h. Will the rezoning result in the expansion of a zoning district, warranted by: 1) Comprehensive Planning; 2) the lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district; or 3) the best interests of the community? i. Does the proposal demonstrate merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of an individual parcel? Section 35-210. REZONIlVG APPLICATION PROCEDURES AND RECONSIDERATION. The following rules shall govern applications for amendments to the Zoning Ordinance hereinafter referred to as"Rezoning Applications": 1. Procedures a. A rezoning application may be initiated by the City Council, the Planning Commission, or by the owner of the subject property. Any such application shall be refened to the Planning Commission for public hearing, study, and report and may not be acted upon by the City Council until it has received the recommendation of the Commission, or until seventy-eight (78) days have elapsed from the date of referral of the application without a report by the Planning Commission. The date of referral is defined as the date of the public hearing. b. The a licant or his authorized a ent shall fill out and submit to the Secret �'Y PP g of the Planning Commission a"zoning application", copies of which aze available at the municipal offices, together with a fee in an amount as set forth by City Council resolution. The application shall be filed with the Secretary of the Planning Commission at least seventeen (17) days befare the date of the public hearing. c. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall refer the matter to the Planning Commission by placing the application upon the agenda of the Commission's next regular meeting; provided, however, that the Secretary may, with the approval of the Chairman of the Commission, place the application on the agenda for a special meeting of the Planning Commission. d. Not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing the Secretary af the Planning Commission shall mail notice of the hearing to the applicant and to the property owners within 350 feet (including streets) of the subject property. The failure of any such owner or occupant to receive such notice shall not invalidate the roceedin s hereunder. P g e. Not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing the Secretary shall publish a notice of hearing in the official newspaper. City of Brooklyn Center 35-5 City Ordinance 2) Public recreational buildings and parks, playgrounds and athletic fields. 3) Signs as permitted in the Brooklyn Center Sign Ordinance. Section 35-355. PLANNED iJNIT DEVELOPMENT. Subdivision 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) district is to promote flexibility in land development and redevelopment, preserve aesthetically significant and environmentally sensitive site features, conserve energy and ensure a high quality of design. Subdivision 2. Classification of PUD Districts; Permitted Uses; Apnlicable Re�ulations. a. Upon rezoning for a PUD, the district shall be designated by the letters "PUD" followed by the alphanumeric designation of the underlying zoning district which may be either the prior zoning classification or a new classification. In cases of mixed use PUDs, the City Council shall, whenever reasonably practicable, specify underlying zoning classifications for the various parts of the PUD. When it is not reasonably practicable to so specify underlying zoning classifications, the Council may rezone the district, or any part thereof, to "PUD-MIXED." b. Regulations governing uses and structures in PUDs shall be the same as those governing the underlying zoning district subject to the following: 1. Regulations may be modified expressly by conditions imposed by the Council at the time of rezoning to PUD. 2. Regulations are modified by implication only to the extent necessary to comply with the development plan of the PUD. 3. In the case of districts rezoned to PUD-MIXED, the Council shall specify regulations applicable to uses and structures in various parts of the district. City of Braoklyn Center 35-47 City Ordinance c. For purposes of determining applicable regulations for uses or structures on land adjacent to or in the vicinity of the PIJD district which depend on the zoning of the PUD district, the underlying zoning classification of PUD districts shall be deemed to be the zoning classification of the district. In the case of a district zoned PUD-MIXED, the underlying zoning classification shall be deemed to be the classification which allows as a permitted use any use which is permitted in the PUD district and which results in the most restrictive regulation of adjacent or nearby properties. Subdivision 3. Development Standards. a. A PUD shall have a minimuxn area of one acre, excluding land included within the floodway or flood fringe overlay districts and excluding existing rights-of-way, unless the City finds that at least one of the following conditions exists: 1. There are unusual physical features of the property or of the surrounding neighborhood such that develapment as a PUD will conserve a physical or terrain feature of importance to the neighborhood or community; 2. The properiy is directly adjacent to or across a public right-of-way from property which previously was developed as a PUD and the new PUD will be perceived as and function as an extension of that previously approved development; or 3. The property is located in a transitional area between different land uses and the development will be used as a buffer between the uses. b. Within a PUD, overall density for residential developments shall be consistent with Section 35-400 of this ordinance. Individual buildings or lots within a PUD may exceed these standards, provided that density for the entire PUD does not exceed the permitted standards. c. Setbacks, buffers and greenstrips within a PUD shall be consistent with Section 35-400 to 35-414 and Section 35-700 of this ordinance unless the developer can demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that a lesser standard should be permitted with the addition of a screening treatment or other mitigative measures. City of Brooklyn Center 35-48 City Ordinance i d. Parking provided for uses within a PUD shall be consistent with the parking requirements contained in Section 35-704 of this ordinance unless the developer can demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that a lesser standard should be permitted on the grounds of the complementarity of peak parking demands by the uses within the PUD. The City may require execution of a restrictive covenant limiting future use of the property to those uses which will continue this parking complementarity, or which aze otherwise approved by the City. Subdivision 4. General Standards. a. The City may allow more than one principal building to be constructed on each platted lot within a PUD. b. A PUD which involves only one land use or a single housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the putposes and objectives of this section. c. A PUD may only contain uses consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. d. All property to be included within a PUD shall be under unified ownership or control or subj ect to such legal restrictions or covenants as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the approved development plan and site plan. e. The uniqueness of each PUD requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities, public facilities and the approval of land subdivision maybe subject to modifications from the City ordinances generally governing them. The City Council may, therefore, approve streets, utilities, public facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with usual specifications or ordinance requirements where it is found that such are not required in the interests of the residents or of the City, except that these subdivisions and plans must be in conformance with all watershed, state, and federal storm water, erosion control, and wetlands requirements. Subdivision 5. Annlication and Review. a. Implementatian of a PUD shall be controlled by the development plan. The development plan may be approved or disapproved by the City Council after evaluation by the Planning Commission. Submission of the development plan shall be made to the Director of Planning and Inspection on such forms and accompanied by such information and documentation as the City may deem necessary or convenient, but shall include at a minimum the following: City of Brooklyn Center 35-49 City Ordinance 1. Street and utility locations and sizes; 2. A drainage plan, including location and size of pipes and water storage areas; 3. A grading plan, including temporary and permanent erosion control provisions; 4. A landscape plan; 5. A lighting plan; 6. A plan for timing and phasing of the development; 7. Covenants or other restrictions proposed for the regulation of the development; 8. A site plan showing the location of all structures and parking areas; 9. Building renderings or elevation drawings of all sides of all buildings to be constructed in at least the first phase of development; and 10. Pro osed underl 'n zonin classification or classifications. P Yi g g Such information may be in a preliminary form, but shall be sufficiently complete and accurate to allow an evaluation of the development by the City. b. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the development plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be published in the official newspaper and actual notice shall be mailed to the applicant and adjacent property owners as required by Section 35-210 of this ordinance. The Planning Commission shall review the development plan and make such recommendations as it deems appropriate regarding the plan within the time limits established by Section 35-210 of this ordinance. c. Following receipt of the recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City Council shall hold such hearing as it deems appropriate regarding the matter. The City Council shall act upon the development plan within the time limits established by Section 35-210 of this ordinance. Approval of the development plan shall constitute rezoning of the property to PUD and conceptual approval of the elements of the plan. In addition to the guidelines provided in Section 35-208 of this ordinance, the City Council shall base its actions on the rezoning upon the following criteria: City of Brooklyn Center 35-50 City Ordinance 1. Compatibility of the plan with the standards, purposes and intent of this section; 2. Consistency of the plan with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; 3. The impact of the plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located; and 4. The adequacy of internal site organization, uses, densities, circulation, parking facilities, public facilities, recreational areas, open spaces, and buffering and landscaping. The City Council may attach such conditions to its approval as it may determine to be necessary to better accomplish the purposes of the PUD district. d. Prior to construction on any site zoned PUD, the developer shall seek plan approval pursuant to Section 35-230 of this ordinance. In addition to the information specifically required by Section 35-230, the developer shall submit such information as may be deemed necessary or convenient by the City to review the consistency of the proposed development with the approved development plan. The plan submitted for approval pursuant to Section 35-230 shall be in substantial compliance with the approved development plan. Substantial compliance shall mean that buildings, parking areas and roads are in essentially the same location as previously approved; the number of dwelling units, if any, has not increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; the floor area of nonresidential areas has not been increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; no building has been increased in the number of floors; open space has not been decreased or altered from its original design or use, and lot coverage of any individual building has not been increased or decreased by more than 10 percent. e. Prior to construction on any site zoned PUD, the developer shall execute a development agreement in a form satisfactory to the City. f. Applicants may combine development plan approval with the plan approval required by Section 35-230 by subrnitting all information required for both simultaneously. g. After approval of the development plan and the plan approval required by Section 35-230, nothing shall be constructed on the site and no building permits shall be issued except in conformity with the approved plans. City of Brooklyn Center 35-51 City Ordinance I h. If within 12 months following approval by the City Council of the development plan, no building permits have been obtained or, if within 12 months after the issuance of building pernuts no construction has commenced on the area approved for the PUD district, the City Council may initiate rezoning of the properly. i. Any maj or amendment to the development plan rnay be approved by the City Council following the same notice and hearing procedures specified in this section. An amendment shall be considered major if it involves any change greater than that permitted by Subdivision Sd of this section. Changes which aze determined by the City Council to be minor may be made if approved by the Planning Commission after such notice and hearing as may be deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission. City of Brooklyn Center 35-52 CiZy Ordinance 66TH CAMDEN 66TH CAMDEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER, MN �ECENO I p"��� EROOKIYNCENTER,MN I PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR: I SITE, GRADING, EROSTION CONTROL o ANKESEERY SEER�O 1� UTILITY LANDSCAPE LIGHTING �'K i oc N Nas�.mt SHEET INDEX FLOOR PLAN, ELEVATIONS WALL SECTION .o.a C0.1 GO�ER SHFtT CI�I E%ISTM1GCpdDITIONS �owr SP-1.1 ATE %AN p s wa 1 VICINITY MAP CJ-i GRAOING.DIWN�GF,6EROSIONCONTRbI u C)-1 AYPPP 1.�...,.�.�.�..� C41 UfX1T1'RAN C?1 R7AN5 u" MCLAGAN E AiFlIG1IfING ii k A�1.1 £L000.PlAN 9 NMO M9° w. M.� E%7Eitlpt ELEVATION wicv v no. w.�..r MS.1 WAN SELTIONS ��w Y .-a. �r�r.a.w �i w ���i��w.�...: �—Y� .R�. wa PROPOSEDSI7E I.00ATION .��H.�.�H�« I�..... m..�....an. GENERAL NOTES 1. This Eduine Cadkimi Plan was prepr.cd by a Neld wrvey prepaeed bY Surde Wd Surveyon 3. We have dio�.n hu�ied wucwrts md wili�ies m anVa auuo n�cnc urvi� the site w the bw d our a6itlry, wbject w ihe IdbwM�g resmctianc wniq oQe.+�a. du na ca�isrc1ury respwd w bcxe ,.y�nn m�qn m� c�K, s�m. o� cau eo. OESIGN CONSULTANTS houridary purposes wch u dds. b. iAMe ulilily oplfitai IhL do fesPOnd. O(IM wiN nai CIVIL EN('dMER bcace ceMm kom Aak maM line ro ihe custamef� wixtwe a hcYiry tliey consider Mo:e segrnmis 30 E AVE SUSAN iU55ElL prlvae in�allmiom d�m are adside thek'ryrisdiaion. N SUITE 205 7Ct: 651-,57J615 a piva�e service b an adj0irer's sNe Croxn tlM� sNe or W 5T. Pwlri, MINNESOTA 5511! fAx: 651�57-8612 Ke eo tl�s cros�a. a� .ajann. u may na be WARNING: localed sin[e nqY aFfenlon will �wl TsA su[h'PrivNC Cp�TMCfOR YlAll BE PESPOMS�BLF iOM1 CAILING FOR LOGTIOnS Oi Nl MCHITER xrvi[ef. (%ISTING UT61TIF5. TnEV 51W1 COOPEMTF WIIH Kt UTIUTY CMVAnlFS in c. Snow ard ke cad'qions dwln 1er mantlis ma MNNTNNING TFR1R SfAVIQ ANO/ OR FEIOCATION Oi IINFS. F. MATTHEw RAY. ARCMITER B�^ Y �3I0 COOUDGE HWY DANA W. ROSEMMAL. AIA OEKYff dM�wlfC tifiM! NidMC! OI i IFNilA NNCtUC Y �fi p �l� THECW�TRKTORSNNICONTKTGOMERSTATEONECKLAT651�5�U00i BERKLEY,bU IB072 fA%: ]{&S 67I16 •M. d�W P�'�� M' aPerxon. Nther alang witl�.a freld nr lFnsT �e NWRS in novu+[[ roa nu tocwiroNS of Kt uMOEacaouNO e bcallon w in lieu d wch a bcalion. �m Very aften W��S. UBLfS. CONDURS. P?f5.' VAtVES OR OTME0. BUMIEO InXCUYY! o! inCWKI�aiM. STRV['fURES BEiORE OIGGING. RIE COM�MAROIt SMALL REPNR OR REMACE 1 a.�.�.�.� t. The surface kalurea ad devAiaa shOwn on Ihu T� �N DAAUGED WRiNGCONSTMURION AT NO COST TO THE dnwMg.�xie bcaled 6y loucks Assodma. m .�..w,.. f. rVl d Ihe u�dergrowd utlliry in(ormatlm ud bcakn ��ww shown on this plan were prepared han rec«d dnw{ngs .4�- aMained Gam the dieM and rtie Ctly d eroaklyn Centa .r,ro.� w.�. qn g E)(iR ME CAUTION MUSf BE E%ERCISEO BEFORE AN Gopher State One Cal I i E%UYATION TAKES PIACE ON OR NEAR R1I5 SRE ''""s"� BEiORE OIGGING. YOU ARE REQUIRED BY lAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONF CMl AT LEAST IB �R" HOURS /N AOVANCE AT 651/<540003. WVER SHEET �.M....... OS-610 i .....d C� I ven+a� a�e .e.. Yne.aa++a uunw +ww� n..an w. a+� sa a. .ne.� esr en n.ia i«aum s� aw. n.w.. n .xn �.u. 66TH CAMDEN a.i. p„b,e sr .ew. sem. �e.v� �un �makn. an ee.n s m.�.a mw. sr aww umq e.roe�w .�w.. iamb. w w �oM. uw a,. ea ua.i �s: am�n uunw .n..� �w.�a.�i v» a�.��» .w .en.<r a ax. o�� ww •.a.v� w. w .1+e� I m.r m�. v.nh wm. ewca co ewwsia. r aw, L> c.�e.n ovxm n�a a+c uu e u� re w«w ..w �nw� a.um.. r� m.r .•�.wue�. Sqq�q� 1MM Mvma Ca^Pa^1 CwmY4iwn1 M INN �u. M�nC OY YNmC iNh LLG Gnnlb�l i�� W YIOIOT33hC. M�M OM Jm 31. �003 I rtlNd yan a m maltws N �avL y ���1 m w.m�ti x.» 4(v.. e mtitiw a.esid vr au wiw�w rrw ti..a�e. wav«n now ti...�e. N.�. w+ e.n+nnrty r.�+ �y���� �'�w r�'ia� x �ae�r� iv. iwz N 1 i u..ar s) w« sa.m ea r� i.� i+.. PIP In a .-r�..:: NBO'7. �J zmwv .r «mm tiamww a M��+ sr m. nwm� Ds�� N n. rns e sa.rn ce�.: 6ROOKlYN CENTER, MN r� 6 56 a. r►o+ wro��r �•a rw (na.�.a ua "-°„--,.si:�= f�l�.,,a.,..� i P T m,. m Mw! s� M MG f�an sM �M^A YY IM W A YrsoYln hk 1 '9"" a...r aa..a,.i. ea+c �e,nr S I�tK (M�� „o ,,,N�� s...r wno e.k n.ca �•e o...bom.�e aa �eana� IM11 [IMNMRE 0.0�0 WKfMK,W NS]1 G61�" 3 T �u.s..wsa V Y aw a f T .'wa �.`iP. a ua°r�..��.n�i «n a c.�w� ,w. x. a y r.. G n.�.u.� exu a.i n` i a£ j 1 W A V iI TW N ti M el �wma Iin nNart et M CanM Aw K s ,.�,s' i T d "'S i P.��' t waa�� ..W. a i g (1 '.:.t'.:. �:�'.�:•i. �.1 w w ..u.,o e.e�..u� e w+M ..n�a w e+M na. e..� �xa w..w .R. d 1 du..w n!� I J� Q /'Y` ta) .sl� a t.m. .�e eamu.+ a o«+sau.,..e w�.w�n .a e.w �M �a». e.e M� w �wa e oou.�.�� u. noxw .r a "�1� wcm iMl RLV./�J iEEi r� 5 OV �Mwndnw�l bW D,awNr 1]. 1KY. IM OaaM� 30. 1M. w Ow�nnl li 7t]I�M �en. r l'.::'.�:. u r war V.. p�y F O C1� ry.) M b 1�nu wN aMtlw M Slam Malr Farnnt aN M��^� btW pe�Mr RI. /N4 IIN DsnO� f]. IM4 w Memwl s. .n, v Ne. ro�a .�r. m�.�a.a er �t ae�r o.�.ner t�. im, n.a o.�+�e.: xa un. oow�.n� Mo. rona. w �4TE �OORE55: b15 86M �eE��N. :J�'.�1:.'.�.�.:'. F ya�4W� A pv��eq� f r u�> �an ia1 a�.a. .w mwua. a Aywme a �anw�.�4 ew rs«u.� m uun� .�e sm� aM.�. aar x.�r. a. iwa w.a �.a �1'�CLAGAN .0 u BROOIfLYN CENIER.\MI� I L7. 1N0, w Oawm�l Xe. 1GpYII1 wN s v�ntlW Cy M�wNm�1 CrtM O�mir 17. //M. MC Ow�nC� ?q 19M Cm�nml Nu iTJIN1. 1" T ID J6-116-t1-t3-Otl! e L i 'Y�� ia> emrV •el a a�e cawum. a ee..�.�� me uem •w.•�•ni emw a�m. s �raa nr x�.e.. ti �wa o.e.e.�� w s+ewn .w ,.«T CY L ti O w.n.�sw �r .x�.r�.n anr Oe�sr �4 tw0. nr ae.M. a4iwo. r omm.�i w. u��ud Q J L O ,`�''i' t O O Y �av a V� 4 �as 4 u. i y fi 2 1 si: ,...a�...a r a•- 1 vu�a' ,�.m� u. '.•r ww� ua 1 s� n mv a L O 7� 2 F::• �..r,.� L' .,f, 1 i r:i:• �,1 i �i1 •G,. It S v..e N T�• :�e'� �1 t a- `1> .1 1 ,1 1 •e,, �i s P�7'� /w. a` p` `i- i� �.z 4. .,n,._ 1 i n .;'v 1 ,rr _.,a� Cfy (I 6CY.:,t. I ��i_—�""_—rT t F f^ n 1 i .g 6 l l I pl 6Jj'/� L v 4 1 y�1 .l j� ll i_�� 4 .on.a.. ,�1��\ p y.+,a 1 I �1 t 1`,. Y 1 ,s�upys_w"�. .,w n �1-I� 4 I 1 �I :t�..� ',l g��l!� p .1 I� 1 I' n ,L-;;. r° "i1 i a �+2� u �t LOT 3 �i l�! -c y..,..._ ,4 i... '9 W �1 I I �F J -�jl-�t I�; 1 �•L''I m nj v„ a� m..�...�v eaw�r m.� e��.e i 1 i w o.a�.. �ue w�n nw ue e.�.�m�i rr ur^-^^ .rt«u. n. mo� i. ,'6 L�YS•� csw� o.�.w ��w ea. w i w.aw i. �rar� iro�m r zn �on� w. 1 y .a...n� o�ix o.�w w�we t«•m� ra .w.�.a br .xw.. m u,a u.. a san. wm.. rwnw ...i an w s+om Nm. 1+ f!� R D�wix Rnl Ma ��raWn A1 Farmwt md MaF<�a �V`�^�l detN D�o�ri� 31. 1YK Md Dw�M� tl. IM4 w Oeemnl Nw I+: !,o:� I cn� a o.ww w n. �.wu.n 1I �otsooe .r «.�.w e� o..�� w. r�.m�i j ryi' nr aa o«�w. w� md^ .w �w�u�..ia ....�.�i a .�.m .m.. fpno�. vaw.. wi ea..,�.�e �e i =.w=-$--� °�°e�, cr o.no4. ware w� uan�.wia. �v�+�� onw oo�ae. t�w4 n.a auer ti 1M4 oeaw�.i� M> eaeaw� .w w GW D�wtM NY �n�OM !Y Osan�nl Nw 731HI1 u.. u.� xat oMe� n.�amv •m. 1 i xro oow.. M� a.s wew T �Yt� a oww�raa� ytl d T Ilm MwM w�nv�i� iM �Kwon. ucx SAN D�noM�mMaY^b�°� [n��� 5 a"°�" d, EXISTING s�xc o.�.a� .mn� n s .am .r."�r t ti..sr a.�r aw.w m�. ti....� cvroar (uw e.ev�rl uw.�e m.. u_c.. rmaer. CON I t swr o.�ew .�..s mr c>wa�. e o�..o+ �voau� f��•4 ma�ae.� ao.i.r ua urN.wi. maw nmm n anetr Wrohai. e� avrymr aal ud. �r»r w. v�wb sr m. w unar ar a"'��� `W^" aw.e zM zo0x .w tt Dwa1r 4i N wb Wwtlon IMl I an a Ml flpM�K lwN�� uNw IM Mn N M A Yl�nsla aM MM�r �IeN w,xs o«wr da.am. aoi ra .�,�..r ww.. a. beaLan d a' bmtN Mrsn IeWnr �M vYeN ua o.�ow �a.va+w �.�ex .m.o.�a n �r. �d .K b r M at �LKI p�nM�. II mri UO fEIE O�nslr u�Myena ��W�a� r o.�.w .ev naw ar sa br d s�v�.•�e.� max 0- 10 w a ��Sunde Land Survevin4, LLC. n� M Dwwlo !M M J�n IC Nw YFn Ilp. Ma lf '�.M N01 Y�� 11�^' b�YI M� 1M 1 1 S�PC6 M�HM CaMaGe�6w� lyrr W 'GlL N �t PME@. OcIMw 14 100I (MMG Omn ?�Md lll F IM wtl11m1bnl 1/w��� 1 M 1�• I Land Building Parking Data zoN�o w �...em., Land Area Setbadcs �a, r.w�, cw ...�.�..rraev� ....ds d.voo_ �.ara.• '�.F.MetlhawRay�NcMtect� I 1 c ..awa..�...�«wm. n�oe.ow.�M�+ I 1 �..o.�� '.ry.r.wM�ppt! t. PNI8KTN0 I. I� gWICSnp Aroa PaHc41O ..�w.�... r.a.wa«n« ieme....� ..o.....�..., '.e.rw•. ...s�..,�....�.� .r� �..s..��r.. ...�e...,.M... CGNC�tIL7AWT: P �N OU.NER/DEVELOPER O ,,,�„y m..m e..�o, K w�n ew.� nr iwe N 's``;6 o..,.�,,,,a.,,�, E 6 ,.��w,�,.� N __i P �E �cT: 'f' 5 3 �+op��ea �I ,•�E commacie� 6 ia..�` w"�:�.'""'� Devalapmant •M,�. I 1 ,�����,,,,w"°``� sE corner i i i .mex .m...n �ww 66th Avenue N �i I I `�I 1 e Gamdeo Averua N. '�`b Brooklyncenta.nniwota j �i I/ I I I �OM4y�Mb �w� �IiL: 1 I y I, 1 'F. �1 s 1 o 1 r 1 I �j 'e I4A11����YY,' i� y s� mv w M i i �1 .°:"'«:u.w'" J 1 I' S F+��'? �I��� i L b�� n x,l i r'�uuasa° 'i r i N l3���'i�� �I w ,�1 L, ti..�rrnw+r.ti Ds±�� 1= f '�il`' �p� k ,y �E: �C wW n.n��.w. Oes�,II_... I I 1� r y,L^S`.{ y na'L Y I �a� I 1 14�W 6rlrr J�_y:�� I Y t �I P ia I rw n.I�w w _I i��� i WILWM1.MwI lr�Y\LU a 7,.�. y C �t T EXTERIOR POLE LK+NTS i Y+ -s`�'�-'s�-s r;€ .i r p... -f r� �-e�..�,,, p\ i f a..�.n�, O ��i k ��c a �F 'a`r1 4' ��.�r.���� DAT[. Nav�b�]!.]aee rn ____p T �i 05073 Z --r i l� i �r:�� 1� �e�.�, 11 .��a i I I 5ite Plan I SP-1.1 suai€cr To suRVer i 1 7- i i I I I I, I I I� I I I �—,�i sr, w.. �f T�TT .'T T ao.� i b� 1 ,...am....m �.w� p F. MetlMw Ray. Arohitecl nam�io�'x.ro� I�I b n��.�e,��.� °1°n anew�.w-.+ ro� �I ..�w. wr.�.on ��5�:�_�. rMC[ �.a. '.i/ rR�f I� �N�------- l�at F ,A� E FNMMO�.�wl AaroT�n �nl4�i �Mw wmp�vVC wa��wwr [mm wo� i 1 1 �.�.n. COP�SUI.?ANi: '�a �s1 D179P8�R ELEVATIf7N �1 DU�1P8TfR ELEVATION V yr 1�tjl .ewa a�+-r-.� �i1 DU'/PBTER WAIL SECTION r.r r-r qWEWDEvELOPER n�. b. e..rn. K uaa [w+� ee. ieew �...o m. or p.� t+e+gw'mi ul MH 9Y-9osf a rtn�uew��ro F'faOJEGT: R �Dll'IPBTERGATEBEGTION Gam�ar�call 1 .w �,n' re Developnenl i I 2 I r.r j bbth Avar�e PL i "°iO V Ganden Avaue K I I 9 &ookhp Caits. Hkr�eeola b 9 o e.srw�.u.. ar...m�.uoiu w..m.unwi oasv �'.I .wn.r� a I I-- E ec 1 I •Il �owrs.mm I f I I r I l �..�F� DETiU� .T-r .�...a �j ...ti r i iss�o FoR: ENLARsED DU'1PBTER nw� .�+.ar� �i1 ENL.4RaED DIA'1P8TER PLAN fOWDATION PL/1N w�a.�n�.:. ti.ar ��1J/suiM•r� a�nNr.r-r r...1�� r.+. +..�_w.yw i w• �r.rr w+ r!i�w� IN' I I IGF IIQ�tED L NPZlC Y W W M W IYlew+l Y+_y�.LY liY1WImYLISlqNIM 11'k1N' m wvw• w n �rzra ri�n J smi run aa xm m� nmcxi o- �ao.rt� o�e�ua m� ww r s� I rao �w�ce c�n� ra..ew m. xn I mwa no.ecr1aesoe �..o� 05073 I __J ea,imrx, o s �w• m e, 811O Defeb I w• wsrw a•au 1 aimrt�a x�m eai rxrr.u� e:�.u: wn wae�e x• �e•xn r�rcx as+in�� GATE LATGH DETAIL GATE LA7GN DETAIL SP-1.2 ecxe: r.r n ka.�m G .r.u. re n iaa.am MYRImK�IYlIM11TCIM 63173F �ca.a"bw.e.W s 66TH CAMDEN �,..'<z-:: GRAOING, DRAINAGE b EROSION CONTRIX NOTES �,,,i"�.--' n� wx.n. u.. wa ~.r�.�r w�. j 5'G!F d �rr �wu.. �w rati .r NoR.�� ,.,,.ws ���a 5 F �E �.M.�:: W e`�'�,p`e,W r-T1 an�wr'�u w iw w: �w«i .i rtw�.�wr'~`� BROOKLYN CfMER, A1N W� F e ..}�r�' �w .w w: Y� .w M��w�ir �"E. we�e�...�.T 1 ?�j� S L J- w� rr.. �".��.e „xx�w u�.x«"w�+� w ..`�ur w.. MllfE SEERY 6 �✓L ,i f C�'i aoc M �u..�x.� w.�. SEER(:OINC �J -�,F,� �sr" ,i i �nv r NNI EIMN M1lE 0.0Nf �t� w OARPAMI. W Ml)) r�nr N mew�w rPo[i r�� �M�^�^�� �M mm 1�b5��9051 .\i r� r� r �iwa a. �.v.....n..�a w ..w...... s+x w w �r.» 2H �elh i' P N J i�/ i y 4 :r �a. w n�.w�:r. w w r�..�"+.:y .wnww Y� i G R`': ~y V` 1 1 M uw� Me ws �iaw xw w.M ti wmw w�w nwM uw nnn rw. i i �..k'�: t. EFr.�-.. 'w.. y J i M ;e�e F i;A?'"-� s /�i!. �r`^ Jr_I A w� fis'" iN E� �"S FFET y GRADING b EROSION CONTRIX NOTES: j� i Q 1 :°"�'"w""� `""»�."°'.:,:"4.,..'..:'n MCLAGAN i 1 .w �I µw i n. a...M ��a....« w�-�., �i "Z i j �,�w �.w�L."" w. i i 1 a y j `.�r�"e i i m t p1.�.: a w r I '1 I M r i +6 S t :.�.C� M "'=L-� v i� ay>_ °�Q "W, y 1 I ��c.t �.i..�; �.T.... v v1 j �';�s,�,n'� y._�.=_ N i@ i '�n�,� �.Y..��.a.., ......y �g `'vs `�;;y i m n..o i -1'�*p��,xa ...,.^S:`�wo IV i I N r. w e f 1 t w.,. a� 4�=_�-- I r �•,`a�~,� y, j ;�cd1S o I :s�a_ ,o, e �"'+`I s �..1 c„ �--r. I 1 w I l 1 f'wi f=-1 I I I I 1 I :5 --T l 1 nr�r�, y 1 --i I C "d3n�_,^ bINMINWS $I�FfP.� I W p�" e I I I f ga ..M...... j i I _L_ ,.e��"-- i 4 I I M v: ;4 i f �e GIUOING Homv PLAN 0 YO M n OS-610 V sceu w raar C3-1 I L 66TH CAMDEN mro.v-:uzq en.. SNPPP GENERAL NOTE4 i �awio. a o�mr ��ic '�°�pqp61oi r ewa a j d a aww wr �e �e ww n�+ rw waor m �O e .i wa�tt a arw� ea a.� �w. E ,_,,,.��5- o�n�m� �w �s� oann a ri �aos s �c w VEN P n �_,�..,.u,�.,�.�.n. BROOKIYNCEN(ER� i w i.,..a.�..�� w�ao a ww aa nar i an we �nw mw rau�a sr���s. io.w vw �wrt. M1KE AERY A2 St 5 W m q� eme s r.a n or SEfR�O NJC .s" �1�'` ``4 �o..n im.� ra ��ou� ��wi�w im� 6 M.. v =w�.�„ f �a +�i� 1 w�i i��ro ra�wic� J l •.r, f 1 �!t r i� �a ��..r ..m micw ne em�.w r`' 1 ne r� w� wrw wc wr oo�waua wunwin w �owm a .c �;.,a .nx inc tr ro aowna� s w[ rwrt. r s xe� m�son i 4. „C ''I ���f`,..^�''�i''`:� aiw.aw aa.�mu.ram�.m.M�uw 4 j' !i7 �J iina wnir m.r. ae ioa� m�n.e�m ma f��.� i.:c :�N i ff�S�,..,�d. I a mwwue�a .mnm mvoi �wwnui I ,�.a a. t 1. �N�� oa woi xoi.en �i �_l M��► 4 a�,�W..,,.��:��..�w,�.,� :.�.��.��,��„�,�w�.. I�� 1. rmn�iu. e`� nir� ■�.o�mo un. ,Y. ��m a �"':':.F°....`�. ��i .r/•� p a" ��-,�»e.::,Ww� rao�rz m�� nnw naa nn.�oo�ana aoMnx neoo�¢ we awoo�sl. �^�y-•" �i n n I t mort um i m o.art�v aui �w i: n t ra�c tt r.r auv +m n� .rwsw�x �i p� w r�erna• .r .urt oonr .w re. °L^= u �>it msiwena wwu rs` R unm v m�� r: i I u�o wae musw s r�wo a m. I.W.�..� �i::nH I� ?4f iT. irtwa i 4��v_ e�Sr.�, DATA: u.. ..r. ��..e� �pa� 4 r 4 i R V ��i�oui¢ �mt J�iw�� �T�T t1�= 't n j' 5AN sn a�„��„� i ,I„` `Mw�e'.ii 1 n nMe]H. v.�r.�... I ir i�� I I �I u-, I I miiiS i i` y f t M 1 yI �i 1y4 SWPPP PLAN nom�x o xo w y.�....... n OS-610 V I �......o, ac�ta m rssr C3-2 I Jyr a n un��Tr ei,w cer�wu r,ores 66TH CAMDEN I w.�.�� w w, w°` ..�.w. .w �.°r a*"" m.�,w. M. w w°'".ro} �O� E•CIC W w wr w �xi w a'W' w ��u �.�....�a. GAS .�..s�.�ixwi .M �xsn.+ �r wie .iwy «xx .a .�nr I �U�i �cc J w w �/,,.�a �y''S rn o'.:��'Y w ".�M w,w :."�o�." I A ce a�'e i°�,/�o �SJ�'� 11 l 6.. 6� u�WeM�mw i1 +N BROOKLYNCEMfRMN 5 M ��r� •r..�. ww« wr o-�w� a w r��i �n..ww I y✓/, �t .•e� 1 y� J� w. mwu :i.v uu -aow N ww ��MIKE SEERY �J n: :`M:. r r�.�..'w .v ��+i�+ a $FER�O INC ry,..- �1 �..,....�.M. l l '^I 1 w r. M p� '.n w���w M.x� w Mn I�NI 4EVEN Ml[ RO.N l 1. ,.r+� w� w wu.r. ML PARN. W blli _.p e) �''6 J A�itDl'l '�i M �a. �/�u.�w�w.w�M�w� M�w MM�1 a�. 3N.H.WS} ��4b�� X �*Y 'i NM}tl{ p �w w u� Ir i �ap.�M�w ��+r� �N a dri� h Z `'�yf�`'F'� yl�� .�..w ^^r i..,. �w+.,...., r�. r_- y i m j� MY��"nt«M w��rv� ONn sw�e w u� wnw ur.��wM ..m «a"^ '�."».�."l w y ��i'c?� ,�.r.........�w�.�.. o.a...p �.....�.�i.s..... j I r.,. s.� w.e m y �`-BEN�NMARN pt P �rr.rs.�.s� f�""�'_^' y ca:-^'� TNH Ei.EV=&38.13 FEF7 t ���F i� I��� Mcl LAGAN I Jr�" j'' w`auq j ���.y..�;..�. a/,� I,:l n a II' �5 n��` I 1 r i i 12 M �,,.w.�.�,.� C j 't i qs rrt uw a v e. c- �..d. 0 I m i I C 1 ,1� ���'�ur-nwtM �4�. g I „Q'� I' zn.�'m.o m:'. I I j .L�P �:r-str v�m� ev:: /�r O `2 a �sJ'. Snn 1 e 1 r�.w.. ,r°"„�,. G .n� •--Y".--`-- I i s 't' I V su�nce I rn�r: u�• 81PJM�.NOLS yi 4 il I I �vH"siav 1 ._.L-1_' i V i I i f l I a L� i m... �I Y _cui �m i UTILITY PUN nome i OS-610 i w C4-1 66TH CAMDEN BROOKIYN CENTER. MN ,.a _w. �.,w..,,..a�....� T. MIKESFERY p, �n�' SEERCOINC L a/ VY wlurqus �E.w v1Wr �]v mE �u O M�DOT 8612 IN �oN�U'.. Mi��� inIX �i (sraoi fA�l .�JL 11l.549051 ?"^'.tt#�i"s �•s vroor w� m� I r ir ws wuaw .w�arz rmr a�M nwa a ai r. r.... MEDNM W TY ia .�yN .,,e uam,wey K' r r 1/YYIiN�WS�[MlMOTf1111tsC�1� r /���h� a-� u-i�..w� i�Cf CWt (nOJ� iJll) I i� �n�iwh f' dnnwws swa vwot xv� rn[ �n 1. STANDMD SELTON s...,.. :"b�t.Ln->i: IOOx CM19R9 �fAAEG�R W WT Jll� Ms 6 q 1 �I D1i1`iEWAY 10' VM16 r Tp ul`c in flW�i911!'.nlw 4T NCAW WTY �e'�e�e p�� eM yq� �p� aMV N O a�ne a�o� n niancs MCLAGAN C BITUMINOUS PAViNG SECTION CONCRETE CURB GUTTER �J r eaa'�.... ^a;_.� �i C.��Z L 'V e..�e�..,n.m..c u s[� oosrs �wo cxc�vrz s srw� u a rcxcpc ro IREfCw VSLWC I11MG iK POSii 1K lIK V POSTS. x�� a �rtncri nc n�rta r.w¢ uafra� wro cow�a i0 �K IdCE M f0�. ��•r [xiCxp IT Ix10 T�E IYCHCN w 1 w1v`i.�nmia',•w'^ fFf+ (yn 1 CONSTRUCTION OF A S1LT FENCE L^'""" c.i o.a..� SILT FENCE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM n;,","';� y �""r l IMrECIiOI fiLl iCMtY2 SW�LI �C qS T[0 IMSO �fTCR CKM M1ti41 w0 �T IE�iT 0/.ILY pRIN6 vxRMW.T IICYV111Li oV�PK SIU�L IE w�OC pK01�T6f. t py�l IC rt�l�ti0 PNpPfLY YNEM Ii OECOMOY[f M ICLM1Kf m"• ItEI�[CTIK �VOIC M MNRICR IS MO LGNfEN XCLEfSMtY. �r nE�iwa� 1QV[�p�NIR1 pmOSRi RCKN��PYMOSI1uRlT R4-Wlf TIL i�"af' DETAiI SHEET SILT FENCE OS-610 C9-1 wos�nrornsa.w �...,....M..�,,.�,.....��.. .�..,..�..,,,,n...,��.�». [On/UMM@D/LN15. N wrurt AEffRTOftAN SGWYWTfOMhWSI0R0� S .66TH&CAMDEfJ �wmu�ewN!�4tiNwunurmM IFI.Yn. �f10ttIMN1R )flInSPIG Q am�e R �wiwnw.�. 5/�U6106FftACSD`ALMAT wu niunrv uiwto suuni�wnr I TOYOitt1MNNW511SRUSH O tOr�(avwn��nRKl3ru N1iNflYYfASFUf#MY. 'W n�ro ��om. ntIACN. T MFP. SFf SPfC n:..nw... T RofewG UxUSCAPFl�14K.5fE1TFC. �wr H�MCCnG•uO�W��w4� fIXINI: Hltq�l�SEISEG m��w v f0(i.1'�WES.W9tiil%AN ra.z....w.w........+..�N.' ~�v���.ua iuiY ��i.m�ivhP� r w n [n w u., O v w�ufY.nronwwrHwnw R.WN1f5fMl-RFWK. �Y ,.,w II r IOlmm't[�TW WYLOMX:M'�LLII1F �aie.•..�.w iv.�.w.r ns' I M�`� y�� BIKKWLYNI ENTER. MN r� O ymn u SHRUBPUNTINGOFTAIt °.,m. MIKE SEERY Ll-1 xw.. xH SEER�OIivC W r,�eg �,.n��...w. y,(y�µ MIAOI.SFI51'E6. ��w.+m.�.r.+ +IfIfVfNM1MUqIJnll llPiH U\RiiA. W 1l.1) :.tanr llN �.ro �nu.rm�...� mcta.5rtsnCS. PtANTPALETT��� •.a �x.rv++�r.v n.w Y������ Alt PLAMS WILI BE l�BELED WITH COUN75AT fINAI SUBMITfAt LANDSCAPE REOUtREMENTS: 80 POINTS PER ONE ACRE OF RETAIL REQUIRED I I castvrrnn�r 118 ACRES OF RETAIL REQUIRESlU:.4 POWTS I II euHr��,mMi�r x "..w.n�� u n.,. o.,,».M. e.m.. 1 �-�yT ion.�vnxc OEODUOU$ TRfE PL�NTING DfTAIt PLANTS PROPOSEO: "-I a „v.., ^.,.n. TYPE MOf PLANTS POINT$ %OF TOTAL �71 PERENNIAL PUNTING SMADE TREE 4 40 40"ti� U-i xu�w•�� �m•'"'• �O fONIFEROUSTREE 3 30 Z0� MCLACAN V :mY .w. DECORATIVE TREE 5 30 2D% E SHRUBS 137 68.5 20°i� ..u,.�.,e,�w... o��...�w..�,�,.,..�....,e .,.,�.,..w.l.w.��.�. �"••••'•�u�,�..�o TOTAI POINTS 168.5 100% .�.,�,�K..�.M.M.,�.�R �,....�,.�o.��n.�..,,.�,�.,.�.��..� N P r .A. �,:.,�:��w �.,.,.MV.�.«..�.......«�.H.�.�n w°�`w� ..m�K..d. I 'm=='�-��• »wwrw»t....oW,.,M�, ...M��w.� w .M»,�.,o»,m...>`. _::i^'� TM2 a...... r.,M„d.. a .w�...�.s.n,s.�..� I i i 1 Y KMM� I.� 1 rt.w+. n rt r ..1" EFl.t ....y..�.�.�.� „t.�...o...., v, ENTRANCESI�N 1 f I y Mrtn�r.e�iwrtr.wa�n/n ���naw�n� r I1t\. I' r��» I �U '.a 1 I I <2 ,�.,M�w�.,�, ..�.�a.v.,.�«,,.�N....>..,,... WM.� I,- I nr j �fr'�a?� j :1 1 __._.r �,.u,,,.« ^N j w w,... .�...Hr..,.,.�.,... 11's' �....�..��ir�� �.,�.�KHV.��.,s, q,o.. .�.���5�`i 1 1-'�il f� n� ,,,.,,n ,w,,..,u.,a,,,m�,�.u,�,;� 1 O t I n.,., ..M,... R F= i, ���j�� j ,..,..,,.;,M `":L j a---- v \I M„� ,..,.,,....u,��a.. i 1 1 v V y� e Mw ,.�,>..m�o 1 n. 1 Y LL I .,..��..,.u.�.R �i 1 Q r" w :"�».«W,,.���..,. :...>..n, 1 .,,,.�I 1 v� ---7 S --aav—� s w,..�.�M....,.,.,,r�. «..a,,... ^9-hit'Dt5TOR6E6AkEA5—•: ,..wn�. I .'-j.e�i_____�E"_I PREIIMINARY ..�.n�..r.��. w..���..�.-x�.,..,r ..n+�u,. �.�..r�.R��.,,.«���.,o. �..�..w�r.,,.K,�.�w�n�....m�.. "7.- 4 LANOSCAPf n..xc..�.ww.v.,n...���...wan...,.weuv. 1 l) PLAN .kM.�..�w....,�....��. n«�w,.�.�,�....K..*��;,.n^.M.,«.�.wx+i.,w.. „s..m.�..�..�.,,�..a.+. -J I "�"�no-,"„" i� I I a eo .o U561U �..,..�,�.u.r,� ���p .um -x'c� �1 I I .,...�.,�.«wa..,��....o,..,, 1'.. norcrx scus u+ reer L�-� j I r \F� �O,/'�� j EIECTPoCX COqBTRUCTION fA. i' t`.� ..+"""�.J rnww� ir.w.w.rwss�m�un w re�✓�.�uunrnu C �t' ,a��,'-- `�`��re_q....�w.. r`�aumm» a... .f' i a O ..a...w.. a a.,m .o.ro, M..� M,.,.n w i e t ,m w" a.". n J ��.ro.,�». �`.,�...._........_.l-.., T�--.._-• .�.o..w wuMnev: ,FLIM f�f L j- i.. ��7:i. j-^� 1 i.S D $7 J a= "6: L I �_�.,,r' ,a L:+ i. tie...AU .w... ��.A.�o. .r,w,o m. I °a wtt: uu,a t l.. r I Q. 1 ...li.r• a �u H 1L:r..^T.T�TI:� J A ta U i1 a .o.,R..w w mxwee�: '1 r''�.,. f 1 0 0 �m w�e u� wmwrw'v.m.. rue 1ure: -T m�m M�SO6 t V.G 4 s,....Su._3g"'T.i u (r-'T,:��; „k� ,.-.,.�`��5i��:��''�`e... L ,,l. ,x,,,,,,.�_.'» 5 i�l y ,d..... .s.. j ....b.i �.,G.l(�.'f.9�� D.P, �O'� 1 '1 1 2?1� Tr.fl 51; 0 wwn .ma�w.�a«m. I 1 1 j I ti t a; .Y t a .n,a� S s y; o i r c�f 2 �f. 1H iy.b'9 •�ii��7.'f�� at--."?.��`.�a �E 15 [P�-r?�x i7 1� ar�naiwa M r.� r��,,."��' �/..'7).; t�l i:� 7.% �.3..Y1��,7 ')�3 '1.. 'la 'l.<�:y :.E 3 a.. o.. �i.r �4(Ci +.0 ift.i)�•"�7 b.t 0 1 't 1 t F'" 2.! 'i.9 'f.t 7. 'L' ^.n 't.a t ��i t ��,Y��� t,f����1� /fig a."d �j; t 'i,� '�A.�s.§?:,F.�t.� 'ax '<.o I.i e.a 7 i _.a� i� 'i.�1 'i �.3`,?+ �3' y i i j `Li r f' �1 t S ��s �y,b"11 l a.a i s 6 3 YV Y's� Aa l5 ��iQ. r. Y.� Z.t� 2w 5�',� i i 11 j .,;3°°� i I ��r tY`".!.��i. �A�'!i 'i.�. 47 '.1 S.t ty 14��'Sa 'i .._.2A 75 4�'� 1 r 1 �1 i „J G� i� i 't� 1 f '�!L �yfTO.r' y.n�: �S.^ b.�' %.i 2.9 '�R 5.e ,'3 h� ,:.o ::.r. �U� 4.• ?.e 4.�'1� i i i c. �1 r .?�z l ,.c F� a. x.s �,�'3i •tr, 'r_.`• ':,r. "''s '1;. 3c _n 12e +e 7.t ;,5;i1,� I y r. 5"�i�i t,y. i .I 1 ,'�i i 7 y F 1-=t:t� `,•.7 :f1 J,f+''�i,9 ?.n :.�i U i';�/.R I }.1 '7.2 Y 1 i t '!:t� 4E �T[�'i.il C? ?.J ?2.8� I�13 �a..' '.tJ 1 F �1 I1 T_ 1 i �"1t `�N '!.1 '16 �J 'i.t� 3.� p'3 %19 .a YR t' 11� 4 �7 r Z ,i t �I.b L.L t.1 9..1.�$.u.�T.l' 3 �.1 9��'5��.; i I.- W 1 �I l tH� �.7 9.4 '1,5 's,b-°3.T I}S•.:�;� �j.� i.t �i'; I j 1 f� �L Q I a. I ,:;1_ h 1a" ;s �i -�r s .c, i. i, �a �k C� T :3 1 u� 1 6 a 1Q �,T� 1 f G d a {�a �f -,....-�"'r"_ I,. ,.S ..'e4'd' e L' �1.1 i� 1 3 l P R� ��2.7 b.T� i 4 ti 1 R 1 d 5 0 Y,�i 5 F %1.F L. i tl, .F. ^A C 't�:;"^a .'n Y2 i2 'i.:�� iD 5.� Y.� i.� 'r.? 59 �n .J ra 1�: 'i.1_.:2t.ap.6�.'f-t �r,= j ___,j�._ l 0 5,. 4 I 0 S 5 b S 3 t'i 1 "t i Y 0 'f U ;t �ey'Y'?�if" 1.1. _�cn T"�'� A 1x D. �p y..� r; n- 4:U. V i i 1 i i r i 1 I j i I j t 1 I i SITE LiGHTING Z•., C PHOTOMETRICS PLAN s i„ I i 4 1 ti t r I I I i i 't _,1.._�_.---- E-SITE PM v��o.ex�tvrnzooai:z�:isrM. I I. F. Matlhew Ray. Archllscl amo�+r.�v� wrr. wt� wn F .Rblsltna u.a�swrna E.I tMW1q.�T�1: �Z. .r .Z�. .11IS 21- �L{-lt t2 L''G .t1 r OII.NERiDEvELOPER n.. e..y 1 1 �""'rwia`,,,�n i i_... i ranuie�ii�� i I I 1 I I I I 1 I I PROJEGT: I I I 1 1 j� _�.�.om,...o.� cR.ami�cw� i I I I 1 I Deve�opmait �i I I 1 I ..:�..�.�.°°".�,r j 1 I 1 I i s 1 1 I I I bbu, a�ve,ue tl 1 I I 9 I I I Gamden Avaue N. I I I 1 I i I &ooklyn Centa, MNnaeota f r ------i------r----- r i i r sEa�.: t i i i i i i i i i i i i i�—s:^��,:.�„ a i i i i i a is�o FoR: I i 1 I i I i A�•• I I I I i .,.,..a.,.�. �i:. y L I �1 L� -i'— _`--I_ PN.11�o✓��.r L:,!js1,iY V WY�YFI�M1�M �!!7�?!!� I ��W 2•i �u.I E1laRG sY� 11'M wr OMW�tlST. WR o�rz� ww.r.. a�. �ow �ilFioor Plan ��*�+*d° v 05073 A-1.1 .��M�..�.. 8d K,�. I I p. �nannew Rar. �huea' .�:e.w m.°°° uw�.+�w-� w.. ,.�..Ina rn.. T.Palsla'/x�a y 'l m'vo�'n`°n �rw� e.tz.sisw+Na y E. iNF+vO�MnM �KYMIa1�o T 0 VN M v��� b C- C- C---� C---� C---� C---� C---- ,..,a ca15�tANS: a: a�.�• I :a...� OtI,NER/DEVELOPER n������ �ilNorth Elevation �.'.u'�.u'$' `J o.R��g.�isi�i .�a.�.. n nww «�.,.o ...�.....e.��4��..0.� PROJECt: Ropoeed Cammerclai DevelopmeM .uu.�..e...oa.,o w..�. awoaw su...o�x.�� ,ovaa...r $E Corner bblh Avena N. y Gamden Avaue N. 1 A� 0rookly� Gailar, flkriaeote Y�_�yT mAn�mtnWM _�tTiOf•V� 1 w'do�M+n •w�'n�r Y wioa �e l� �iY.: V �pn�yWp1�W I�W�AwN a T IMM�l1A1Ci! �5 nw�oMtl V -W1n.�V'- MW.w�ms YM4•M� ��-w�w�N w��n��YAY East Elevatfon �Uleet ElevaUOn 18SI�D FOR nr.�ti.r ..r..rar w.r a a.n �r_.;._____ �"3� t►nrr.a�.+�..... a u.a..�r.r ±.+JA..a!! �.w� i►.rrn..±�F.!.._. �i/M�!W�.. �Yni1 RaY �1Ytaow C�AI�\a4l�dfllll�m IG�A_��sv��m�orw� CKaePM� DR�IIl10 �T. OYw y.� D�ll� Horsb�]).SLiO �m.waw�wi I�WCTNfCtlO ..11�14n1Lw�lm ,��.a�.��. 05073 .�..,p,.� Exixbr Bevstlorn I I �"•rT� s�ee+w,a��. .�or+�w�o�r n3outh Elavatlon `w.ert`.smma�..nrw�w. 53'f7ET'RiC! ow.u.noi —.��,-�-4�- rw �,.,.c,ma..��,.,� +s w �eo wu�na� ��ru f. Matlhew Ray� M�hilecl n�oc..w.w-.. rnL.eM..ramwrvimo ru.rerd.�wvwwvweo I �.i:uiw wY'em.�oowaw�mr Nrrti�.o�aowcwiwa E.iWqO�^M rR.t1�LL G�p1pfl��lLVC�I�� GYIP�R �lO�ic tYYC�C) I N�'31�'� 6TiKt�� Y r 1 fK1CPG�1� �LPi. (I�IND 000 (YK!'D) W fYY,1�II �OPC �ull .,...,,,.,a�.,..�� OuNEWDEVELOPER ro. Orm,�Ye i t NNI EM:wi MY 11w0 i OMD�'k MUl �I 1d 17Y/ NI-Y6l 1417� SM-NU PROJEGT: Propoe�l Gomm�Uel �im sr+wo v.� nwa �.m�--.�� „m r.w ro w• run ��na---� DevebPmmmnt 1 c.ucr.m�� SECorner craR r�vn �w.� n.w w d.u. w�• e.nw w.w �nwc- rm�'ma i� °JM bblh Avdue t1 .n•.mu,.wio,r.- »,00���u,+wnw GandenAverxreN y i &ooYJyn Canter. Mkroeote T 5EAL: i� �,..,K�....�.na.'.•...�n, �,K�.�.�.,.a.�.•..�,.-- n.,r IS°�I�DFOR x�r.ewr M`O�fM/1�OI1OLMiwAYM� M'O�l+M�PMDWMIIWM(P'__:' IwW fV�M Osr�liM '�pr'�wt��14KMiMY��•e �MLYLI1�YMp�'NI I►WIVlV111w!� r�aow worLLre��wrro� .J uy� i►.w1 e..�iwr r�q�r u.ws o.ni_w+. a�4� wu.� rrr.«� !y I �•mxaanarv�r�a.w.rr.a�• �a...row �wwM ax r m�nc�m. �A �y� waa� _A� I 1 S['v�Y1d1:W'��+ ID�i�11dT Y�Y aeaac er. wwwn sn ow� o�tc. rw�w �s. �eo� ra rato�m� 'urao,.nw 'wa+acr wreoe a,.e.�,.. �„��,w �.:.�.�.:a:�,�i� 05073 .'��ama.ru re .nnc.� owcr z. ;a tme ��1 WaY Seetlorn wen weeA ��t�o� g�4•=��-o• A-5.1 Wall Sacblon 3/4"=1'-O' care:nr�. M�IA1U411M/TC/K ��r�n1 Vrv.uil�i� I Member B o ec k introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-41 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2006-001 SUBMITTED BY SP BROOKLYN CENTER, LLC. WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 98-133 adopted on July 27, 1998 approved a rezoning from G2 (Commerce) to PUD/G2 of a 16.76 acre site bounded on the north by 66�' Avenue and the SuperAmerica property; on the east by T. H. 252; on the south by Interstate 694; and on the west by Camden Avenue North; and WHEREAS, said Planned Unit Development (PUD) included approval for developing an 85,240 sq. ft., 4,592 seat, 20 screen theatre on a proposed 13.09 acre site and the creation of two other sites, referred to as pad site 2" and pad site 3" for future commercial development; and WHEREAS, Condition No. 15 of City Council Resolution No. 98-133 requires the future development of pad site 2 and pad site 3 to be subject to an amendment to the Planned Unit Development and Condition No. 16 of said resolution prohibits the development of pad site 2 and pad site 3 as a fast food/convenience food restaurant, a gasoline service station/convenience i store, car wash, pawn shop or check cashing operation; and i`�:` WHEREAS, Planning Comrnission Application No. 2006-001 consisting of a PUD amendment to allow construction of a 10,000 sq. ft. multi tenant retail building at the southeast corner of 66`� and Camden Avenues North (pad site 2) has been submitted by S P Brooklyn Center, LLC; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly ealled public hearing on February 16, 2006, when a staff report and public testimony regarding the Planned Unit Development were received; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Planned Unit Development Amendment request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating rezonings cantained in Section 35-208 of the City' s Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance in Section 35-355 of the City' s Zoning Ordinance, ttie City' s Comprehensive Plan and City Council Resolution No. 9&133. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of $rooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2006-�1 submitted by S P Brooklyn Center, LLC be approved based upon the following considerations. l. The Planned Unit Development Amendment is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City' s Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Planned Unit Development Amendment will allow for the utilization of the land g� 4 in question in a manner w hic h is compati b le wi t h, comp limen t a r y to an d o f comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. 3. The utilization of the property as proposed under the Planned Unit Development is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with City Ordinance standards for the G2 underlying zoning district. 4. The Planned Unit development proposal is considered compatible with the recommendations of the City' s Comprehensive Plan for this area of the City. 5. The Planned Unit Development appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and ean be considered an asset to the community. 6. In light of the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating rezonings as contained in Section 35-208 of the City' s Zoning Ordinance are met and that the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2006-001 Be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: l. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of pemuts. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance or permits. 3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of pemuts to assure completion of all required site improvements. 4, B-612 curb and gutter sha11 be provided around all parking and driving areas. 5. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 6. The building shall be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 7. Underground irrigation shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 1 8. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. i ;3 9. An as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the release of the performance guarantee. 10. The landscape plan shall be modified prior to the issuance of building permits for this project to comply with the landscape point system used for evaluating landscape plans. The landscape plan shall provide a minimum of 1021andscape points. 11. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center Standard Specifications and Details. 12. The applicant shall obtain an NPDES permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and provide adequate erosion control as approved by the City Engineering Department and prior to disturbing the site. 13. The applicant shall enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be reviewed and approved by the Ciry Attomey prior to the issuance of building permits. Said agreements shall acknowledge the Planned Unit Development Amendment and be filed with the title to the property prior to the issuance of building permits for this development. This agreement shall further assure compliance with the development plans submitted with this application. 14. No part of the property being considered for development under this proposal shall at any time be used as a fast food/convenience food restaurant, a gasoline service station/convenience store, car wash, pawn shop or check cashing operation and the development agreement will acknowledge this restriction or limitation on the future use of the property. 15. The applicant shall provide an appropriate directional sign, or signs, to prohibit south bound traffic between the building and the easterly angled parking area. 16. 'The appli�ant shall provide a street and sidewalk easement in a form and manner approved by the City Engineer for portions of Camden and 66`� Avenues that currently encroach into the proposed site. C o �/.�i�rr _..1%� i,i Date Chair ATTEST: Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resalution was duly seconded by member R o c h e and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Chair Willson, Commissioners Boeck, Rahn and Roche and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. C r j s MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION QF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION FEBRUARY 16, 2006 CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to arder by Chair Willson at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Tim Willson, Commissioners Graydon Boeck, Sean Rahn, and Tim Roche were present. Also present were Secretary to the Planning Commission/Planning and Zoning Specialist Ronald Warren, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. Rachel Lund was absent and excused. APPROVAL OF MINUTES December 15, 2005 There was a motion by Commissioner Graydon Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Sean Rahn, to approve the minutes of the December 15, 2005 meeting as submitted. The motion passed. Commissioner Tim Roche abstained as he was absent at the meeting. U ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Comrnissioner Roche seconded by CommissionerRahn, to adjourn the 2005 Planning Commission. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 7:02 p.m. ADMINISTER OATH OF OFFICE Mr. Warren administered the Oath of Office to Tim Roche. CALL TO ORDER: 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION The 2006 Planning Commission was called to order by Acting Chair Willson at 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION Acting Chair Tim Willson, Commissioners Graydon Boeck, Sean Rahn and Tim Roche were present. Also preser�t were Secretary to the Planning Commission/Planning and Zoning Specialist Ronald Warren and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. ELECTION OF 2006 CHAIlZ AND CHAIR PRO TEM Acting Chair Willson opened the floor for nominations. Tl�ere was a motion by Commissioner Boeck and seconded by Commissinoer Roche to table election of Officers until a subsequent Planning Commission meeting so that that the Commission would be at full membership capacity with all members in attendance. CHAIR' S EXPLANATION Chair Willson explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. APPLICATION NO. 2006-001 SP BROOKLYN CENTER, LLC Chair Willson introduced Application No. 2006-001, a request for Planned Unit Development Amendment and development plan approval for a 10,000 sq. ft. multi tenant building at 615 66 Avenue North. The property is zoned PUD/G2 (Planned Unit Development/Commerce). Mr. Warren presented the staff report describing the location of the property and the proposal. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 2-13-06 for Application No. 2006-041, and the Director of Public Works' memo dated 2-10-06, attached.) A Planned Unit Development Rezoning from G2 to PUD/C-2 and development plan approval for a 20 screen, 85, 240 sq. ft. Regal Theatre was approved by the City Council under Resolution No. 98-133 on July 27, 1998. This application is an amendment to the approval. Cornmissioner Rahn asked for clarification in defining a fast food restaurant in relation to the number of seats in such a facility. Mr. Warren explained the requirements for seating and parking that defines a fast food/convenience food restaurant in a strip mall versus a freestanding building. Commissioner Roche asked if there could be a coffee shop and fast food type restaurant in this strip ma1L Mr. Warren responded that these two businesses would have to meet the parking requirements and probably could not do so. He noted that a"fast food/convenience food restaurant" is not allowed because of Resolution No. 98-133 and also because of the R-3 abutment across 66 Avenue North. Chair Willson asked if any shared parking agreements had been discussed with Regal Theatre. Mr. Warren responded that he was not aware of any agreement and that the Regal Theatre site does not, to his knowledge, have any excess parking spaces that could be dedieated for such a use. He added that such an agreement would be subject to approval by the City. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATION NO. 2006-001 There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Roche to open the public hearing on Application No. 2006-001, at 7:50 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Willson called for comments from the public. The Chair recognized the applicant, Mr. Jim LaVelle, 7800 Metro Boulevard, Bloomington. He stated that he is willing to cooperate with landscape and engineering concerns including the existing encroachment on the sidewalk. He added that they are willing to comply with the city and understand the parking requirements per city ordinances. He pointed out that they have a number of potential tenants, none of which have been signed at this time, and are working to acquire tenants that will be good for the neighborhood Commissioner Boeck asked if the applicant is familiar with the City Engineer's concerns noted in his memo. Mr. LaVelle responded that they do understand what the City Engineer is requesting and have no problem meeting his requests. Ms. Susan Fussell, Architect with Louck's and Associates, stated that she has read the report written by the City Engineer and understands and will comply with his eoncerns. Commissioner Boeck asked about drainage from the site. Ms. Fussell responded that the site has been designed so as to allow water to drain from the higher end of the lot but they will look at doing some regrading that will allow some drainage to the western edge of the site. They will also look at additional catch basins on the western edge of the property. Commissioner Roche inquired about the landscape plans and asked the applicant if they would review plans further to continue with the existing landscape look along Camden and 66 Avenues. Mr. LaVelle stated that would be no problem and he would discuss it with the landscape architect. Commissioner Roche inquired of the applicant if there were any plans to alter the existing island area at the shared access on 66` Mr. LaVelle responded that he is aware of the existing situation with the island area and he feels that development of the site will help navigate people around the existing island which will make more sense when the access to SA is shared with access to the proposed strip ma1L He also stated they would add signage that would allow safe movement around the site. There was further discussion regarding access to the site by the Cornmissioners and the applicant. Commissioner Roche asked about the colors of the buildings. Mr. LaVelle provided a material board with the colors that will be used on the building. Commissioner Rahn asked for clarification of sign requirements on the exterior of the building. Mr. Warren responded that they are allowed one freestanding sign for the entire center which can identify all tenants. The location also is allowed up to 15 percent of the wall area for tenant identification for each tenant. Mr. LaVelle stated that he looks forward to working with the City and looks for a favorable response. Mr. Terry Moses, current owner of the property, introduced himself and reminded the Planning Commission about an issue regarding the placement of a sign for SA that was poorly placed and has been knocked over by their trucks. No other persons from the public appeared before the Commission during the public hearing on Application No. 2006-001. CLOSE PUBLTC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck seconded by Commissioner Rahn, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2006-001, at 8:14 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners interpased no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 2006-001 There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Roche to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2006-01 regarding the reeommended disposition of Planning Commission Application 2006-001 submitted by SP Brooklyn Center, LLC. Voting in favor: Chair Willson, Commissioners Boeck, Rahn, and Roche. The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its February 27, 2006 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Warren stated that there will be a meeting on March 2, 2006 with an application received for a special use permit. Also the City Council has referred to the Planning Commission an ordinance amendment regarding side yard setbacks as they relate to eave overhangs. There was no other business. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Rahn, to adjourn the Plamm�g Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:32 p.m. Chair Recorded and transcribed by: Rebecca Crass Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING DISPOSITTON OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2006-001 SUBMITTED BY SP BROOKLYN CENTER, LLC. WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 98-133 adopted on July 27, 1998 approved a rezoning from C-2 (Commerce) to PUD/C-2 of a 16.76 acre site bounded on the north by 66th Avenue and the SuperAmerica property; on the east by T. H. 252; on the south by Interstate 694; and on the west by Camden Avenue North; and WHEREAS, said Planned Unit Development (PUD) included approval for developing an 85,240 sq. ft., 4,592 seat, 20 screen theatre on a proposed 13.09 acre site and the creation of two other sites, referred to as "pad site 2" and "pad site 3" for future commercial development; and WHEREAS, Condition No. 15 of City Council Resolution No. 98-133 requires the future development of pad site 2 and pad site 3 to be subject to an amendment to the Planned Unit Development and Condition No. 16 of said resolution prohibits the development of pad site 2 and pad site 3 as a fast food/convenience food restaurant, a gasoline service station/convenience store, car wash, pawn shop or check cashing operation; and WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2006-001 consisting of a PUD amendment to allow construction of a 10,000 sq. ft. multi tenant retail building at the southeast corner of 66th and Camden Avenues North (pad site 2) has been submitted by S P Brooklyn Center, LLC; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on February 16, 2006, when a staff report and public testimony regarding the Planned Unit Development were received; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recammended approval of Flanning Commission Application No. 2006-001 by adopting Planning Commissian Resolution No. 2006- O1 on February 16, 200�; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered Planning Commission Application No. 2006-01 at their February 27, 2006 meeting; and RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City Council has considered this Planned Unit Development Amei�dment request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating rezonings contained in Section 35-208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance in Section 35-355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the City's Comprehensive Plan, City Council Resolution No. 98-133 and the Planning Commission's recommendation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Application No. 2006-001 submitted by S P Brooklyn Center, LLC be approved based upon the following considerations: 1. The Planned Unit Development Amendment is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Planned Unit Development Amendment will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. 3. The utilization of the property as proposed under the Planned Unit Development is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with City Ordinance standards for the C-2 underlying zoning district. 4. The Planned Unit development proposal is considered compatible with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the City. 5. The Planned Unit Development appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and can be considered an asset to the community. 6. In light of the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating rezonings as contained in Section 35-208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and that the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Application No. 2006-001 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. RESOLUTION NO. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance or permits. 3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits to assure completion of all required site improvements. 4. B-612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 5. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 6. The building shall be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 7. Underground irrigation shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. 9. An as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the release of the performance guarantee. 10. The landscape plan shall be modified prior to the issuance of building permits for this project to comply with the landscape point system used for evaluating landscape plans. The landscape plan shall provide a minimum of 1021andscape points. 1 l. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center Standard Specifications and Details. 12. The applicant shall obtain an NPDES permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and provide adequate erosion control as approved by the City Engineering Department and prior to disturbing the site. R.ESOLUTION NO. 13. The applicant shall enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. Said agreements shall acknowledge the Planned Unit Development Amendment and be filed with the title to the property prior to the issuance af building permits for this development. This agreement shall further assure compliance with the development plans submitted with this application. 14. No part of the property being considered for development under this proposal shall at any time be used as a fast food/convenience food restaurant, a gasoline service station/convenience store, car wash, pawn shop or check cashing operation and the development agreement wiIl acknowledge this restriction or limitation on the future use of the property. 15. The applicant shall provide an appropriate directional sign, or signs, to prohibit south bound traffic between the building and the easterly angled parking area. 16. The applicant shall provide a street and sidewalk easement in a form and manner approved by the City Engineer for portions of Camden and 66th Avenues that currently encroach into the propased site. Februarv 27, 2006 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City Council Agenda Item l�To. 10 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT FROM OPPORTUNITY SITE TASK FORCE, THANKING OPPORTUNITY SITE TASK FORCE FOR ITS WORK, AND DIRECTING IMPLEMENTATION EFFORTS WHEREAS, the City Council appointed a task force to study and make recommendations regarding the Opportunity Site; and WHEREAS, the City Council also asked the Opportunity Site Task Force to review the former Northbrook/Hmong American Shopping Center Site; and WHEREAS, the Task Force has conducted a number of ineetings over the past year; and WHEREAS, the Task Force has studied both the Opportunity Site and the Northbrook/Hmong American Shopping Center Site; and WHEREAS, the Task Force has presented its recommendations to the City Council; and WHEREAS, public Open Houses were held for the Northbrook/Hmong American Shopping Center Site and the Opportunity Site; and WHEREAS, the City Council would like to express its appreciation to the Opportunity Site Task Force and the many citizens who have participated in the Open Houses and study processes; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to go forward with the recommendations of the Opportunity Site Task Force. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the members of the Opportunity Site Task Force be and hereby are thanked for their valuable and dedicated service in developing the Opportunity Site report and the development of design standards and guidelines for the Opportunity Site and the Northbrook/Hmong American Shopping Center Site. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, hereby accepts, with gratitude, the report of the Opportunity Site Task Force. RESOLUTION NO. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that staff be and hereby are directed to continue work to develop framewarks for the implementation of the recommendations of the Opportunity Site Task Force with the recommendations for the Opportunity Site Task Force being referred to the Planning Commission for study and development of proposed amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan as may be necessary to create a framework that would allow for the gradual implementation of the recommendations and standards set forth in the Opportunity Site Task Force report. Februarv 27, 2006 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the followmg voted agamst the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. h 4� 4 f 'a i. r. 9 .y��' A AF .O r u 6, .L I �S. f ti� �h�� G' ti j� -U Opportunity Site Master Plan Development Guidelines Prepared for City of Brooklyn Center Prepared by Opportunity Site Task Force Assisted by Damon Farher Associates Elness Swenson Graham Architects Benshoof Associates Stanley Consultants Visual Communications February 27 2006 I Opportunity Site �,�asterPlan DevelopmentGuidelines TAB�E OF CONTENTS A. Introduction C. Standards for Private Development A. I. intent of t't�� IVlaster Plan 1 C. Inkent of the Standard� .........36 C. I, a. �tructure of the Standards 36 A. II. Background 2 C. I. b. District Overviews.......................................... 37 A III. Existing Conditions 2 C. II. District Guidelines: Mixed-Use Center............38 C. II. a. Overview 38 A. IV. Master Plan 7 C. II. b. Site Development Standards............................40 C. II. c. Architectural Guidelines 41 a V. Purpose. What are the Guidelines? ................15 A. VI. Application ..........................17 C. 111. Shingle Creek Neighborhood 43 C. tll. a. Overview 43 B. Systems Guidelines C. III. b. Site Development Standards 44 C. III. c. Architectural Guidelines 45 E3 I. Contexr .................................20 C. IV. The Parkway Neighborhood ..........................47 B. II. Mix of Uses 21 C. IV. a. Overview. .....................................47 C. IV. b. Site Development Standards ............................48 B. III. Transportation System .................................22 C. IV. c. Architectural Guidelines...................... ............48 S III. a. Street Configuration ............22 B. III. b. Public Transit Provisions .................................30 C. V. Highway 100 District:................................... 51 B. III. c. Bicycle/Pedestrian Provisions 30 C. V. a. Overview........... ..........................................51 C. V. b. Site Development Standards ............................53 B. IV. Parking Strategy 30 C. V. c. Architectural Guidelines...................... ............54 B. V. Open Space 31 C. VI. Review and Approvals Process... 56 B. VI. Storm Water Management System 32 B. VII. Utilities 33 Opportunity Site A. INTRODUCTION i�� A. I. Intent of the Masterplan ��'L,.���, tj�,.:---. .c The Opportunity Site provides the City of Brooklyn �„r. t r y� Center with an exciting opportunity to work toward 4� a unified development framework for a 100 acre t parcel of land that is currently a disjointed J `f r� fi amalgam of commercial, retail and institutional I 4 uses that do not relate well to the context of this ,I 4 'J�' unique site. It provides the opportunity to f r 4 integrate the site into the larger community, c including: the regional trail and open space z.�' �y,� r system, nearby neighborhoods, Brookdale Mall, the expanding civic uses and the Earle Brown ����r Y r �i. A i� r Heritage Center. The Opportunity Site Master Y ,ti?�� Plan Guideline proposes recommendations that q ',,,t�`' r'Y•.. will reinforce and guide publicJprivate investment �i�` in a manner that will enhance and strengthen the r� s �y ''`s viability of the area and recommend Brooklyn r:4����,` Center, as a regional point of destination. ti •,i •,r e :f��;i��� r�;� ;b, '?Tir��;:�: e In the winter of 2004, Team Brooklyn Center, led i; by Damon Farber Associates was commissioned by the City of Brooklyn Center to lead an eight I member community task force to prepare a master plan, a set of design guidelines, zoning ''1 amendments and a request for proposal for a r�. �s:�� phase one developer. The purpose of the plan is 1- to establish an appropriate framework for the Y redevelopment as a mixed use destination, to f" e� ��i�' T c S� incorporate: =r-F-�-.. a a comprehensive vision for the 113 acre site, ��R�• E Y including the pattern, form and character of new c F r�'�� f -C develo ment and o en s ace in the interest of P p P f creating a cohesive mixed-use neighborhood and W city center. �t I I�1 r I -J a framework of transportation infrastructure to support the reuse of the area and to create appropriate levels of parking, vehicular, transit, bicycle and pedestrian access to the redevelopment. Opportunity Site MasterPlan DeveloprT�Pn? �uidelines a set of design standards to guide the well supported plan for transforming this under architectural quality of the overall development. perforrning retail area into a vibrant mixed-use neighborhood destination. While subject to the foilowing regulations and guidelines, the conceptual plan layout is flexible to A. III. Existiny Conditions respond to physical site constraints, users' needs, community desires and a changing market. The The site boundaries are Highway 100 on the east, plan allows for variations in the design of the Shingle Creek Parkway on the west, Summit street and open space network, individual block Drive on the north and County Road 10 on the layout and a variety of housing types to meet City south. It consists of three mega blocks of retail f-'�� statutes, regulations and guidelines. uses oriented in various directions. :�i Transportation, transit and pedestrian services to, :�i from and within the site are disjointed and A. II. Backgrounc� �1+++ confusing. The existing development lacks The Opportunity Site began as a designated area continuity, character and a unique sense of place. In addition to the physical limitations of the by The Metropolitan Council, a regional entity that �:-�n� govems metropolitan growth issues. The site, existing site, there is potential that significant tax Hennepin County Service Center located on the Southwest corner of the benefits could be derived from a major intersection of US Interstate 94 and MN Highway redevelopment of the area into a mixed-use 100, is uniquely situated within the Twin Cities neighborhood and city center. Also, the metropolitan area. introduction of residential uses on-site will produce an added benefit and increased value to Calthorpe Associates woricing for the Metropolitan the Brookdale Mall area. I Council held a series of community workshops to 'I help determine the vision. Brooklyn Center wanted a redevelopment that would transform the area into a vibrant neighborhood destination. The Design Team began work after the visioning -r process to create a master plan framework that i ,r�=���� reflects the vision of the community and also provides flexibility for the development community to be as creative as possible in their proposals for •+F the site. 1; This document is a culmination of an intensive 13 ro��+ month planning process that started in December Current �evelopment Configuration of 2004. Eleven meetings with the community task force, four public meetings, a meeting with business and property owners and multiple meetings with government agencies, including: MnDOT, Hennepin County Transportation Department, Metro Transit, Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission and City staff have all contributed to the development of a Opportunity Site Master Plan Development Guidelines Transportation �1�I,y r r r i' li r f� r r .''�r�r. '-�ts ,t. qr- a!� es4t _��.nar I 4'� ����sr��r•��"^"°.,':�_'J`�l`��'}� a` �.�'y" ���.r i�_ The existing site has a number of strengths and x�' '`�''f•� 'x j �.'�r� r weaknesses regarding the existing roadway s, r 5 ;.1 system. The following summary identifies issues �:fi� t�?'�.+����;,� A���`� y t r --lf� that are addressed in the Master Plan. i r j t y �r r+r.� r �1�� f r r�rt i: r j� �t �-'l� �.t `'_��c �'�T� S 'y� �e r s r r Transportation Strengths '7 1 Y�� I'� �t;,,� A j y r r r r s�,i��, T 1` i� if r'* A L' _:.T J r r r Bounded by regional highways on the north t -a r y r I and east p-with full access interchanges at I-94 th !!-+1� i Shingle Creek Parkway and TH 100 57 y ��f Avenue N. Fr'�K�'� ;k r 1,. Y i i r �y.,�,. 4 .s x�� t� _l.�ti +src�J..'.. p Yr r r f C 117 t��� Slip ramps along southbound TH 100, allow 1 �w easy southbound movements to and from Summit r���� t� r �,�,r� g Drive and John Martin Drive. �.`r C.+ i�� ro i' 1 r f '�4 Shingle Creek Parkway and other roadways �t�� '1. Ef n X ���F �,r r.. within study area have significant unused trafflc ,S�A� F t, e�n. y l i I capacity. I i d� t I �,'�,Y i i .i r +'i_ o' t,. ..�s. Yl, �i r 1 ;i�'� y'I� r� i ii ;t�, J 1 i t r y R 5 �i.��• �j N S� I ,.,eT q �e ii g 97,10 nDT Y. 9� n k �t,.� f �D 'F�. li a l r4. *;t t �r r�'Y �r �:s-",� .4{ t i; �;iuuaDt u�n nt i r F r 1� i w�(t i-.�."'.r T T r t 11 T+ i.` r �J.�l f '4 f S E _!4 j ,3� M rr .i, t. r y R: �fi I r C ;r a �i ��'"4 T" �'�i 6��1 r� t s� i r f �����a ('•5�pt ,•r�f, r .:;1m ;,r�•" f�CE���� �t�* tr t°.�k :q M¢rR �....�.+.J.JJJJ �.t J J ,:.IS .�w r .�l.�f��r :-��,t..b.� 4 I I� K;'' ,�-�.J r- a F.. ��a �—C�' I f �i'� fi r r :r 1�.�''` tFS "I s� a ,r y y i �ti ,r ...w�rw�t�Y'f t� M Lr 1. l .�T J� ,4� ���i. J ���i �I: r .i' Opportu�i�ts Site ;Iopment Guidelines Transportation Weaknesses Interchange at TH 100 and I-94 only serves movements between the east and south. Movements between the west and south have to r �S `i use the I-94/Shingle Creek Parkway interchange i r... and 65"' Avenue. Fr J�� .e Access between study area and northbound 'y,`�;. TH 100 is less direct and more confusing than r�"a�-� �-J access tolfrom southbound TH 100. l y r 2 n f �I j� If Confusion for some motorists traveling r X southbound on John Martin Drive when they /y ,r-----��-- 1 y\ ��y i cross the bridge over TH 100 and discover they f� r e, have to turn left onto northbound TH 100 entrance R °o "O� r i; f"� ramp. Some of these motorists make a U-turn at D1 J l e��` r `Y� r .i'J. ��+Mr. the intersection of John Martin Drive and the r r A,,,,,�,,;�,,,,a northbound ramp. ��r Y I a�'L:'"' .�Y'.�'r`` �t^i.:�� ,f" F s��� FF Confusion for some motorists regarding the f network of roads within the study area and how to travel to/from particular properties. Lack of a direct vehicle connection, aside from N t I 57`" Avenue through its interchange with TH 100, �t� �l between the study area and the neighborhoods l 5 l, "v east of TH 100. i r J j j� �v�l�`,';;. r s G l �y'.' d f e' r CS q \i Y i F L i i 'j`Y '>t t r t ..t i r ,1 u'�� `!°;LsR r ��iy, t i s. �a�,. 1�ra:t r �,e L;..4��u w j— <d �[+QC�k'nl j— a +/5..,�' s.. �`:�:�r=�� r r :rs f f� .�e;.,,,,.,G '_�,.4. <.Y -a�:� �i r `:�s :,{'r t=- f:�� �'i 1 Opportunity Site Plan D� �;���I, :i��_� Public Transit 8� Trails „i x �r��� �t'"a c r� T The existing site is currently served by transit and �r r r.r, ,�.�V is within a long walk of the existing transit hub at i �r 57th Avenue and Northway Drive. The following 7 r� �'t, A s r�+ summary identifies issues that are addressed in b r the Master Plan framework. k+ �k� r r T l r wl ti .1 F �i J 't, �Fr���l^ t�.t' c"T �'a��� i ��k S�'� �'�f.1 t Strengths �sT r� e� s x z,� Y r i �N t Metro Transit Route 722 provides 30 minute ,���,,.�J _r,� ,a' j service along Shingle Creek Parkway, with �t x transfer opportunities to multiple other routes at r r the Brooklyn Center Transit Center. r L: r f i� ,rr� s y G j Frequent service is provided between the �i�, 1 j transit center and downtown Minneapolis. Transit r r y f w, service between the project site and downtown 4, Minneapolis typically takes 25-30 minutes in i r i w.. �F k SG...P lif... .Ir 1 F either direction. Y ;d� i p ti.� 1 t �t j� Study area is adjacent to regional bicycle/pedestrian trail along Shingle Creek. V fS l :i�� a Pedestrian Brid e across TH100 at 59`" r' j�"= L `�;1 9 e� �r y ,C' l, �1 Avenue provides good connectivity with K 'i� n `��7' Ro�io zani f� r r 3 neighborhoods to the east. p� J r r` 2a rrios l ar ..r 1 �i��: �1 4 4 ft le �.tivt l Pedestrian access to nearb libra and r f 11 '"P'" Y �Y r y f:x i. �_z f Y r �i Henne m Coun Service Center is at controlled r'? ''*'r�� T y P •�^M 1 e,: intersection providing safe pedestnan crossing. ;�rvj�:< <,lr;:i ,i•>� k ,j I I(' ti a; m i aS Weaknesses �F e� r� ��Xr i� j�t�-. u t �1 r_ 1 �r 7 a� x Attractiveness of transit service is limited by r n €���i T;� rt two factors: 1 walkin distances between bus 9 a, ��uist ��"C� r �.,1p- stops along Shingle Creek Parkway and parts of R�� v� i, ��r r Fr +1 T_"� study area are quite significant and 2) the r t r'` Brooklyn Center Transit Center is over Y� mile r t 1�tr r� r, from most of the study area and, thus, not within �i i.y easy walking distance. f r� �i rr r .�,i: There is not a high demand for transit service in this area, because of the lack of residential Oppa�tunit} Site MasterPlan DevelopmentGuidelines R( ?+^t 4 �I I kP-„' T'. uses within the site and the struggling office uses Storm Water 8� Utilities `t� north of the site. The site is well served by utilities. Located �t,� -:i Existing connections between study area and between three of the city's water towers, the site bicycle/pedestrian trail along Shingle Creek and has access to an existing 8 inch supply line of R" TH100 have poor identity and quality. potable water. Sanitary sewer is also located in a all major roadways. The existing sanitary sewer 7 �3�� d ����r lift station along Shingle Creek Parkway will be w r r T 1 �r J in k i upgraded to support the proposed residential �,f i lr a c �f uses on the site. i 4 g��� if 1 rt The site is relatively flat and is served by an x�:'' r a e x i s t i n g s t o r m w a t e r p i p i n g s y s t e m. C u r r e n t l y, t h e t storm water collected on-site is routed directl y into �A Shingle Creek or it flows north into the West ���C Mississippi watershed. Future development uwll J �'a address storm water within the project site, thus r- f `��1 f., y A improving the overll water quality within Shigle r t L:~� Creek. Existing Storm Water Flow The location of groundwater is a concern. A Opportunities number of soil borings have been taken along Shingle Creek Parlcway, which indicate ground A number of opportunities emerged after the Existin a,ccess to shin le Creek Trail S stem Water ranging between 48 feet from the existing g y ground elevation. Careful study will be required �reful analysis of existing conditions. These for placing future structures. opportunities informed the exploration of concepts in the next stage of the process: A number of areas within the Opportunity Site are within the 100 and 500 year Shingle Creek EnhanCe pedestrian connections floodplain. The master plan will need to address mitigation of floodplain storage within the project Use storm water as an amenity limits. Improve connections to Brookdale Improve access to transportation Improve neighborhood connections Improve access to public transit 6 Opportiinity Site h�lasterPiar DevelnpmentGuidelines R. IV. Master Plan Minimize the impact of automobiles through Fulfill related development objectives, such as strategies such as "shared parking" in which provision of on-street parking and traffic calming A number of goals emerged during the initial adjacent land uses having different peak-hour measures. meetings with the Task Force that have been pa�4cing demands can share parfcing facilities. refined through the analysis of existing conditions Provide for public open space that incorporates and plan development. The goals were Improve access to and from Highway 100, storm water treatment ponds as a visual and developed with an eye towards providing the Interstate 94 and County Road 10. recreational amenity. development community a clear and concise understanding of the community's vision for the Provide safe, effective and understandable �'�r�� project. A system was needed to set standards access via the regional roadway system. �r for the overall project and to allow enough F 1��. flexibiliry for developers to tailor their portion of Minimize the need for vehicles to travel on city the project towards the needs of the end users. roads by providing compatible neighborhood I commercial uses within close proximity to An Urban Design Overiay (UDO) system allows residents and integrating public transit within easy this kind of creative flexibility. The UDO sets walking distance of commercial and residential I standards for urban design relationships that uses. ��f ensure the scale and character of redevelopment that the communiry expects, while still allowing Meet applicable standards and access spacing r the developer to arrive at creative solutions that standards for access to/from the regional roadway meet their financial requirements and the needs system. of the community. The intent of the Opportunity Site Master Plan is to provide a comfortable, safe, Achieve "traffic calming° benefits through: an mixed-use development with emphasis on integrated street network providing options for j'�������y Pedescrian Env�ronmenc pedestrian oriented streetscapes, diverse housing traffic flow, the avoidance of excessively wide options, adequate open space and quality streets, and the provision for on-street parking. architecture. Provide effective connectivity with Brookdale ��,T More soecificallv. the UDO and su000rtina Desian Shopping Center and with nearby neighborhoods. z`+ Guidelines are intended to: Provide a network of local roadways that is Ensure the compatible integration of retail, easy for motorists to understand and provides r�. •—...G'!� office and residential uses. convenient access to all properties in the study y' z' area. i� Ensure the compatible integration of a vanety ���s of housing types, including townhouses, medium Establish layouts for local roadways to meet r density and high density residential. multi le ob'ectives, includin P 1 9 ��'�1�1��6� Safe and Convenient On-Street Parking Maintain a scale and organization of development that emphasizes sensitivity to the Provide sufficient capacity to accommodate P edestrian environment. projected volumes. Provide a high level of safety for motonsts, pedestrians, and bicyclists. OppoRunity Site i�laste� �lan Development Guidelines tiS 1 I I i f� Y F f v�: i y �I ..I r. t�� t k �ti k k r i I I L i _r I�. i- r i r1 f:'. -f i adw,�.it..- -4'.. �1 If�l��, °c' a.� �ai!:ifi�' "'��v�,.:.:...., t r i� I; Storm Water as Visual Amenity r' Ensure the compatibility of buildings with E respect to the specific character of their I r�- immediate context within each UDO district. I �:7 F..�.� Encourage active ground floor uses, such as F a i �.t` restaurants, shops and services to animate the F_: street within the Mixed-use Center portion of the area. :.r Provide frequent transit service to/from the Brooklyn Center Transit Station and convenient ''a' bus stop locations. t.i: tu i Provide a convenient and safe network of .r: sidewalks and trails within the study area. T r j 4. y .3. r The task force developed a vision statement for a r; j 1 4 F�, e, the entire project that will guide development of the plan and aid in the evaluation of development ro osals. It is shown to the left. ��i a P P ,x i �i I a 9 B I. I �',.4 I Y 1 f. -a r`1� i �I C; t i.'_ y r I� y 1 4 Fi: �l 0 0 i: r 1�; 1 i I �r ft- -f a i�r r 'lal,. r'� tr�� s Opportunity Sit ititasterPian DevelopmentGuitleline� Exploration of Alternatives A number of alternatives were explored to test how the goals and vision identified by the community could be incorporated within the Opportunity Site. The following summarizes the themes and approaches used to explore the future potential of redevelopment on the site. OppoRunity Site �laster Plan Development Guidelines n f .t�\,��'_ v��t��� i::` y L �.y r_ ....r u `r s �r F'. �\'7�,��,� �R'J':! y�`�. f Ty M b, �l ♦a�.� I l. i -M o(..J.� ,.:i s i�i' .P �.�I1 1� 1 ,I g r i :F t I' "?u J� f S �s q j i.r "a� 1 j �r�ir :i: 1 '.A� �3� 1 ;.�s �CI� k s t. 1 I 1 w r f 3 t r f w y l r f'+ 4 I j i' J �i 5 -v .i i �...i y �1 V� t'k 1 ,l �i�/ l `t I 5 1 �1. ,/r_ 3 f ��1 ry� �f ti 1� i il s y �.`�e.. y .s� r .4 i� �w �f 3 r r ft J ��r /�i�> j� i 4 ��f l "o,� i M1 ��,oa,� r i a s.::, �'v s I����a L .;i, I 7 1-� F �r �s i,. a Y s .�I�'a� a d `'+.1 t/ l r�. f t` a y J t� �r T i i��`�'.� jt.� f,.� �•r a i r•g t y tr r—� r- 4, y p• t�'` "e`' �r, t,��ld IS _�.ii�. ��5���' I��.,"�+.r I'� ��`''��f i r in�;( �f•J I�1 �R`. 1 f a ti r• i�. 4��' a�i u��('(.LI�} J f f ,q •L f a�'T' 1 i.� r I �E ..:1 i�i �'f�l�1 1.�c. �p{ r.' r'_: G._ f- t r 3 a.. �;l'�� f- :�'!A:''".1� �J�� l. �'11 1 �S'� :�')9l T'��� 'C 4 �@7F "The Villa�e at Shingle Creek" "The Backyard Green" "Main Street° i This alternative strives to better connect the This altemative is modeled after the Centennial This alternative is centered on the spine of a project open space with the adjacent open spaces Lakes project in Edina. A central open space with community main street and two large pocket at Shingle Creek and Central Park. Retail a regional storm water pond is centered on the parks. Retail development would anchor the development is located on the east side of the site. The pond is surrounded by residential uses. southern edge of the site and act as a terminus to open space on either side of John Martin Drive. The residential backyards would overlook the the Main Street. A civic use on the northern edge This location provides good visibiliry from Shingle open space. Retail development is adjacent to of the site would also act as a focal point for the Creek Parkway. New civic and office uses are County Road 10, which has the highest level of northern end of the Main Street. Housing uses located on the northwest edge of the site adjacent drive-by traffic. New civic and office uses are would cluster around the Main Street and the two to the existing civic core and offlce uses. Medium located on the northwest edge of the site adjacent pocket parks. Office uses would serve as a to high density housing uses are located on the to the existing civic core and office uses. transition from the Highway 100 corridor on the southern, eastem and northern sections of the east. Every residential parcel would be within a site. one block walk of public open space. lo Opportimity Site Master Plan Development Guidelines f .d�...:i .r,, v ��.i�:��i .r. S. ^:s-y�'b�� �"�dK.a�YFK s k r i F, R "w� ,.��"ti q, J l j r s v� f :1 R r r �a r---� ��a y� f-- ��w .A� ,.�g' f f 1 ��1 b..Se rJ.. .i� Mi• i f �"�61.w a r j �r L 3• 7 iW d+� i f� �T� J�� ..,A f i �I .i t� ,k�``+Gr"'T j J t 1 m r r �"�'<.l� l i J 5���� �I� J 9 J r j °s'..- ..y'� ,V �P' I y� s'� �P' �e. 1 '���P Y S �T t. i� i' f k h +�1} l S'7 M 1 r .�41� x#Y h l� sG' `�S ��,�i.�� V M y `f� f 7 F' f J i �P F ,r� ft F 4 r f 5�`��' n�. �i''-''� �7�: d i-�' ��r� l :3'�' �.71 f ,�i. •�I j t �i�.« i'r� ,�l i'`` �n ��:Y s �i�� r e�'v��� r' i s` I �7 i t `��jr�' V'� ij �l �f i t� 8 f f a �c�`_�' 1�r. �.,��y, �\L `r�*� a� 't{ 4 ��W C ��DY�'Z;,: ���t �il�x:. i 6�� f�J}�.�, A �,.a=y�, :��.uii�;{�Lt�kr.. v �✓i.in�fL{•.f10 ,1i. �:�Y.:(It) `{.�f�. r u w r; �I�.� �:l:� 1 !�al�'M�'_ri-"�*'����� !Arl�l������� �,��1� "The Urban Villa�e" "Earle Brown Parkway" "Interior Parkway° This alternative creates a central civic space at This alternative connects a central paricway and This altemative is similar to the concept to the left the east and west terminus points of John Martin open space to the existing Earle Brown Parkway. but creates a closed loop around the public open Drive. A smaller neighborhood retail area is A strong link is made to the existing uses to the space similar to the Minneapolis Grand Rounds located between the civic space and Shingle north. A regional storm water pond and public park system. The loop road is roughly 1 mile in Creek Parkway. Office uses are located between open space is in the center of the development. length. Retail uses are again between the open the retail area and the existing office uses to the Retail is located along County Road 10 and also space and Shingle Creek Parkway but stretched north. Housing is the primary use proposed with on John Martin Drive between the open space out to take advantage of views to the open space. a much more urban feel and limited green space. and Shingle Creek Parkway. Office and civic Office use is expanded along the northem edge Storm water storage would need to be achieved uses are clustered next to the Hennepin County and civic uses have been eliminated. off site. Service Center. Housing is located with a one Connections are made to Earle Brown Parkway block walk of the open space. but not in a direct manner as was done in the previous scheme. tt Opportunity Site �.lasterPlan DevelnpmentGuidelines The Master Plan u� A �O r "'r r, j w "'r.� t The master plan provides a framework for the f entire redevelopment effort. The project area is �'s R broken into four unique districts that relate directly to the primary public open space system. The 4 f f e Mixed-Use Center, Shingle Creek and Parkway ,y �,j Neighborhoods and the Highway 100 District form x the primary development opportunities within the project. �,1� The Mixed-Use Center will provide primarily retail s uses on the first floor with housing or office uses above. It will become a pedestrian friendly y a'•� commercial center and community desUnation. r o TM ��o� e. The Shingle Creek and Parkway Neighborhoods l j' i C will provide a range of inedium to high density housing styles and choices for everyone from empty nesters to young professionals. t i The Highway 100 Distnct allows flexibility to Y; e�' i'. i create high density office space as the market o o allows or to provide higher density housing along the Highway 100 frontage. All of the districts are Y L within a block of transit service and the central f f open space. r The network of roads and sidewalks within the project area will link people who live, recreate, work and shop in the districts to the central open i� space. Like spokes on a wheel, the streets r�� provide the necessary structure for individual r projects to be developed within the framework of j}'� �-j i I t i a comprehensive redevelopment plan. `1 v _z_ FT� 1 ������ai���t-►�.��� ��L l r i� .4�.. ,_�W �w,� A _a i wC�11 Master Plan Concept ]3 Opportimity Site Master Pl;�n Uevelopment Guicielines Master Plan Districts frontage" of the distriCt. This side of the district will also allow retail uses integrated into the The Mixed Center ground floor of residential or office buildings. =Y- _l= The Mixed-use Center provides the broadest variety and highest intensity of development fis�!M' within the project. It will require both vertically and horizontally integrated mix of uses containing n'�� L'! multi-level retail as well as office and residential �i� uses over round floor retail uses. It will re uire :.i 9 4 �i ��I� public open spaces, streets, sidewalks, plazas ��j etc that encourage and promote pedestrian .y-�"� activity and that connect it to the public open n space. Higher Density Housing Facing the Street F I The Parkway Neighborhood t. E y The Parkway Neighborhood is a residential Highway 100 District Housing neighborhood characterized by medium density I 1�1 4 housing in low to mid rise, multi-level, multi- I� R-� resident buildings or in urban town homes all a facing onto the central open space. Y'. 2 �y� a ,.l�} Sli 1.��. -j y i. �.,j w,� .x:. y 5 <<kl..,, �K j� �Y, .a�.Ui-� y r I y �7� Y�. A Quality Place to Live, Work 8� Play ;5 The Shingle Creek Neighborhood The Shingle Creek Neighborhood is reserved for high-density low and mid rise housing. The district will allow and encourage the integration of Urban Town Homes Facing the Parkway service and/or restaurant related retail space that is integrated into the ground floor of residential The Highway 100 District buildings. The Highway 100 District allows for but does not require a mix of uses. Ground to sky residential uses will front on the central open space. Residential or offlce use will occupy the "highway 14 Opportunity Site NlasterPlan Develo��mentGuidelines A. V. Purpose. What are the Guidelines? Providing investor and property owner The primary purpose of Development Guidelines confidence through design continuity is to set basic parameters, describe preferences The Development Guidelines achieve the above and design intent. Development Guidelines are through standards for new construction that established to ensure that public and private regulate site design, building placement and development projects implement the Goals, building design. The Guidelines inGude an Objectives, Policies and Character envisioned by explanation of the general and specific design the community. principles promoted by each aspect of the guidelines, as well as a variety of images The Guidelines �rovide a framework for: describing appropriate design solutions to implement those principles. This approach values Enhancing the quality of the built environment creativity and allov� for numerous design solutions for any particular project. Achieving quality contextual design Achievin desi n that im lements the vision of 9 9 P each district in which the property is located, thereby promoting an identiry for the Opportunity Site Encouraging a diversity of architectural styles Providing design flexibility instead of aesthetic control Creating a pedestrian-oriented environment unique within the metropolitan area f j r� i� r r 't.{ �a� Store Fronts with Architectural Character 15 Opportunity Site Master Plan Development Guideline� Possible Redevelopment Schemes It is most likely that this project will be developed �'a y� in phases over a number of years. The followin g x' F: illustrations explore the possibility of a number of the northem parcels redeveloping in the early ��.�K�, stages of the project. Each of the options A focuses on residential development and t' embodies the spirit of the guidelines described herein. t f,. Each of the following three scenarios depicts the r �r design flexibility provided to the developer. Each r�� redevelopment scheme embodies the guidelines r of a pedestrian oriented mixed-use neighborhood r I with regional storm water pond(s), public open space and connections to nearby amenities but r also allows the developer to tailor the site plan to 3� meet the needs of the developmenYs end users. The City Manager is responsible for the j administration of the Development Guidelines. r�� Projects in the Opportunity Site area must comply "�,1_✓'� ,��,E' with the Develo ment Guidelines as well as the P r 3 n provisions of the City Code. Compliance will be f determined as part of the site plan review process. r i' 23' �i: t� f L E'�' i�rr f J 4 9 r� t f. t �t� r. N .'�.4��fsfe4i i �.1c, ��'�1: •i: r eta 1�..,- lu �pDGl�lilllt} SIIt' MasterPlan DevelopilientGuidelines A. VL Application The format and content of these guidelines are specifically tailored for use as a reference. They are organized into two separate documents that are intended to be used by two different audiences, the Systems Guide/ines and the Standards forPrivate Development. The first document, Systems Guidelines, provides design guidance for all elements of the public infrastructure. It outlines issues and provides design standards that apply to the entire Opportunity Site redevelopment area. It is intended as an attachment to the Master Plan Document itself. The Systems Guidelines describe the following: Items of the overall infrastructure framework Context Open Space Transportation Systems Storm Water Systems Utilities Mix of Uses Parking Strategy The Second document, Standards for Private Deve/opment, is intended to provide guidance to private developers as they take responsibility for individual components within the master plan. It will help assure that the private development that takes place in the Opportunity Site redevelopment area will fulfill the City's goals and objectives for the redevelopment. The Standards for Private Development deal with the four individual districts within the Master Plan and the individual buildings within those districts. 17 I Systems Guidelines '��as I '�L, f i a i I ,�:�r r I y ��k 7 R C �:6�, 1 s Y f�( ''„'3.�' ,f ���fi� r r 'M�.+y'1 j I y �i i 1 Y �1 i ��-x T Oppn�tunity �ite Nlaster Pla�� DevelopmentGuideline> B. Systems Guidelines B. I. C���,rext w��� Although unique, the Opportunity Site Area is not '!�•i'�y,>, Systems Guidelines describe the elements of the :��:,,y:, public infrastructure. It outlines issues and intended to be a stand alone district within the provides guidance for standards that apply to the City; instead it will be a part of, and connect with, entire Opportunity Site redevelopment area. It is a variety of local, city-wide and regional systems. Each development project, whether a single r intended as an attachment to the master plan �,1 building, one lot, or a series of blocks, must Document itself. The Systems Guidelines will k` provide reasonable links to these systems as a deal with the seven distinct items identified in e a� primary design objective. ,a� A.VI. x 5� :r These seven items represent the overall Guideline Recommendations or anizin elements that ive sha e and form to 9 9 9 P the public elements of the master plan. It is To insure that the Opportunity Site redevelopment A intended that they will be adopted by the City as takes full advantage of local and regional Shingle Creek Parkway will remain a vital north/south part of the master plan, will become part of City systems, development should: �mk policy and will be implemented by the City and/or with City participation with the work of private Provide safe, easily recognized linkages to city Become an integral part of the city and county I developers. The Systems Guidelines will identify and regional systems. drainage/storm water management plan. and guide how private parcels are allowed to be developed. They will prescribe Design Standards Parks and open space will be easily accessible for all above ground, visible elements of the to all Opportunity Site redevelopment area public infrastructure including street and roadway residents, visitors, people who work here and also design, streetscape and landscape design, for the citizens of Brooklyn Center and the pedestrian spaces, connectivity between private surrounding area. and public spaces, parking strategies and policy, etc. Systems Guidelines will prescribe everything in the public realm from curb sections and paving materials to street lights, park benches, waste receptacles, tree species and other site components. The project will link to the local trail system Coordinate with, and improve, the utiliry network Make provisions for city and regional transit service and amenities to encourage their use Integrate with and complement the existing (and future) street organization Oppni�,inity Site Master Plan Developmen� Guldelir�� 8. II. Mix of Uses Accommodate'big box' uses, only ifthey are innovative and line open facades with smaller The master plan identifies the desired mix of alternative retail uses. uses within the project area. A horizontal and vertical mix of uses is desired within the primary All uses should reinforce pedestrian activity at Mixed-Use Center. A mix of complimentary the street level. housing styles and scales should be incorporated into the northern residential districts of the project. New uses should reinforce the public open space and activity at street-level. The mix of uses is designed to promote daytime activity with shoppers and workers and activity will r. .,-t continue in the evening with residents and 2 visitors enjoying new family entertainment g� opportunities. �i� Guideline Recommendations F I Promote vertical mixed use within the Mixed- Use Center of the project. Provide flexibility for developers wishing to be creative with potential c;t���a���� �nannacy �,teresr retail uses in other areas of the project. ,lj d ���'�I.':� J s= I t_���- �.�I I �E� Mixed-Use building with Retail on first floor and residential above 21 Opportunity Site Master Plan Develo��ment Guidelines B. III. Transportation System i The transportation system for the project area consists of three principal components: roadway network, streets and public transit provisions, and bicycle/pedestrian provisions. It is important that all three components of the overall transportation system function in an effective and well integrated C° s� l manner to achieve the fundamental goals of the r�, master plan. Principal design guidelines for each of these three components are presented next. V� B. III, a. Street Confiyuration ��D��� v/ Access Improvements to/from TH 100 �p� j Access between the project area and TH 100 presently is provided through a non-standard rype l I of interchange at County Road 10 and John o p- Martin Drive. The ramps on the west side of TH i 100 (from the north and to the south) are particularly contrary to current design standards. o This current situation resuRs in considerable o° confusion for motorists traveling to and from the p� Project area and also causes increased potential C� �`Y�, for accidents. �U o i O i� The master plan will resolve this problem by i i upgrading the current interchange (particularly the 4 ramps on the west side of TH 100) into a standard i s lit-diamond e of interchan e. Ram s to and P tYP 9 P J___.� from the north on TH 100 will be at John Martin Drive, and ramps to/from the south will be at o e 0 County Road 10. John Martin Drive and County Road 10 will be linked with one-way service roads. It also enhances the opportunity to create �:.Pa�ray a 'front door' to the redevelopment. f p i .aQ�CJ' Cdlector Road A round-a-bout could be considered on the east GC�C, Local Road side of the John Martin Drive bridge over Highway ,'i':-' OOC)GO sn�� c�«k P_� 100 would allow travelers who accidentally cross Street Hierarchy the bridge going east bound to tum around and return to the project site. 22 Opportimity Site 1��1aster Plan Development Guiilelines t x Access locations for existing developments outside the project area on the north and east r sides of Summit Drive. i� M �t� r� „r .i _i� s p, r F i� y� ,L� A Traffic Circle provides i�n�rcved Traffic Flow and a Unique Gateway to the Site ,�N: A possible round-a-bout on the west side would allow for smooth traffic flow on the west side of Access to businesses north of Summit Drive will remain Highway 100 and minimize future maintenance of a traffic signal at John Martin Drive and the southbound exit ramp. Alignments of Internal Roadways and Locations of Intersections The master plan includes a combination of both "fixed" locations for certain roadways and intersections and flexibility for other roadway alignments and intersections. Princi�al items that are fixed due to existina constraints are: Alignment of John Martin Drive at TH 100. The plan does not envision replacement of the existing John Martin Drive bridge over TH 100. Alignment of Summit Drive between Shingle Creek Parkway and the southeastern Earle Brown Drive intersection. Intersections of Shingle Creek Parkway with Summit Drive and John Martin Drive. 23 Opportunity Sit� MasterPlan DevelopmentGuidelines Cross-Section Characteristics for Each Roadway Category The master plan includes specific recommended cross-section characteristics for the following roadway categories: Shingle Creek Parkway, Summit Drive, Parkway, Local Commercial Street, i and Local Residential Street. �ia�� °F- Shingle Creek Parkway f s` `r g 1 �Y`. f F This roadway, which has been designated by the t: 3 City as a collector presently accommodates x :-T�� between 13,300 and 17,200 vehicles per day. r t'S�� t With its full access interchange at I-94 and its ��S`� k= major intersection at County Road 10, Shingle »e x ,s,: a Y"- Y Creek Parkway serves as a highly important 'i� '�y access route to Shingle Creek Parkway Section a n d f r o m t h e p r o j e c t a r e a. W i t h o n e e x c e p t i o n, the basic geometric conflguration of Shingle .�r,,..<' Creek Parkway is proposed to remain the same ,,c' 14.0 12.0 12.0 18.0 12.0 12.0 8.0 14.0 as at present because the roadway provides 2 0 i o i o 2 p adequate capaciry to effectively accommodate the io8.oh:: planned redevelopment. The one exception is possible widening along portions of the east side of the roadway to create on-The transportation improvements portrayed in the Master Plan combine to facilitate the Smart Growth with improved wayfinding, accessible !�1 transit operations, readily available development parcels, easily understood street parking bays. The streetscape is proposed to be enhanced with new street lighting, site fumishings, landscaping and improved pedestrian crossing to better connect the site to the existing regional trail along ShingleCreek and to the Central Park area behind City Hall. _.;r:' 2n OppoRimity Site Master Plan Development Guidelines Summit Drive The master plan envisions Summit Drive will become a collector loop road. The northern q.�±r portion will be in the same location as existing '.}3,:_: Summit Drive. As the roadway continues to the east and south, it will curve into the project area, will have a major intersection with John Martin Drive (which in tum connects with TH 100), and will continue to a new intersection on Shingle Creek Parkway north of County Road 10. The _j j 4 �3 i .5�� i.x. .,�1a k existmg road is a four lane configuration, while the ti proposed redesign creates a three lane configuration with a center left turn lane. A multi- E Q, purpose shoulder is included to provide for transit a stops and future flexibility to the roadway in case M a four lane configuration is desired in the future. l u i ,8.0, 13.0 „8.0, 12.0 12.0 12.O 13.0 ,8.0, 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 100.0�<��;� 25 Opportimity Jite h�laster Plan �4< D��v�lopment Guidelines Parkway A one-way parkway roadway is envisioned for the perimeter of the central open space. The approximate one mile length of parkway provides a manageable loop for reCreational and family users of the open space. The direction of travel ,s will be counter-clockwise ta allow for parallel x: parkinq bays on the outside of the parkway for users of the open space and visitors to local residents. _r The paPkway is similar in design to the parkway around much of the Minne�polis Grand Rounds I I `i �,'�r-"'�1 t system design by Horace Cleveland. A multi-use hp��;,., trail will be provided within the central open space I r to accommodate bicycles, pedestrians and roller t� 1� F� i blades. The relatively short length of the parkway wi l l e n sure t ha t pe r forma n C e bicyc lis ts wi l l no t b e attracted to riding on the parkway, as is 10.0 8.0 ,,6.0, 15.0 „6.0, 12.0 sometimes expenenced on the Minneapolis 2 p system. This loop parkway roadway can be shut down for community parades and festivals without causing serious disruption to overall functioning of 60.0 RIGHT-OF-WAV the roadway system. This parkway is intended to become a signature roadway within the development. II r A I e`�: K.. r P y S --�e .;.x .:.r The (�arkway provides a safe loop for recreation and promotes active living 26 Opportunity Site h�laster Pla�t P_Y Develoii�r�� �,�ur1P�i� Primary Commercial Street This street will become the main pedestrian space p within the mixed-use core. It will be characterized by wide sidewalks, decorative paving, seating, f public art in prominent locations and outdoor dining areas. y -�Ty;� ����--i. a The overall goal is to create a rich urban j!� experience that emphasizes pedestrians and 1.; attracts unique businesses to a quality retail d e s tin a ti on. D e c or a tiv e s tr e e t l i g h t i n g w il l e n h a n c e i:?,. the unique quality of the Primary Commercial �4 Street and will support the pedestrian character of f ,�4 zµ y the sidewalk and adequately light the street. i t 1 Decorative banners and hanging baskets must be :r�!` added to reinforce the pedestrian scale. Shade `�"'r "i trees will provide dappled shade from summer sun. r This street will be the most highly developed 14.0 8.0 12.0 S0A 12.0 8.0 14.0 street within the project. The street will 2 0 2.0 accommodate one lane of travel in each direction. Parallel or diagonal parking will slow traffic and 122 0 a c��T o- provide convenient access to retail shops and restaurants. The street surface will be a decorative material to support this as a unique destination. Buildings will be set on the edge of the right of way line to maintain a consistent edge and scale on the street. First floors will be primarily commercial/retail uses. The lower levels of the buildings will be detailed to animate the J-L al. i street and reinforce the pedestrian scale. ;ti text 'y 1 �y 'i o" N t "�c o. s Opportunity Site NlasterPlan DevelopnientGuidelines Local Commercial Street The development of local commercial streets is t���, important to attracting and keeping high quality retailers in the project area. These streets will be t_ r�;� a �r� F :=a. f easily accessible from Summit Dnve and will �H<<, x -.�3�' provide a clear and logical system for shoppers to `?s,��.° access local shops. The plan envisions these streets will provide one lane in each direction plus a center left turn lane. 1 TT A 14 foot sidewalk/boulevard will be provided on each side to accommodate pedestrian movements and opportunities for merchants to 4 have outdoor displays of goods and for �{l restaurants to have outdoor dining. The cross- I �r,� section for the local commercial street offers T '��r flexibility of having a wider right-of-way with on- r~ street parking or a narrower right-of-way with no .1 on-street parking. f .�...:n-' ._.,.�L.<a� On users of the area should be able to 14.0 8.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 8.0 14.0 access the local sidewalks easily from parking areas and signage should orient them to the 2.0 C 2.0 commercial district. The sidewalks provide an HV.O RIGHT-OF-WAY initial and lasting impression ofthe Mixed-Use Center. Decorative paving, lighting and landscaping all contribute to providing a high t quality pedestrian experience. The visual image V�' 1 of the street influences the perceived quality of goods and services inside the stores. A positive !y� visual image is important to retail success and 's. development of a sense of place. �r 1 �.F t+v L �c R r �.ly w 1` r w. �rii�.. A. streetscape with seasonal interest Pedestrian connections allow convenient access to Commercial Street Sectlon business ?g Oppoitunity Site N1�+sterPlan D��,elo,�mentGuidelines Local Residential Street If the Parkway is the hub of residential life, than tFie local residential streets are the spokes. They will become the primary entrance and exit points ,1;�, for residents and visitors. Convenient on-street parking allows for quick stops by visitors. Access C=Y,�� to concealed garages will primarily be located on these streets. Front stoops will be encouraged to reinforce the pedestrian character of these roads. Sidewalks will provide safe and easy access to 2���.� s�R,,, the central open space or to public transit stops M along Summit Drive. Decorative lighting, paving and landscaping will combine to provide a high quality pedestrian environment. The canopies of large shade trees will ultimately grow together to foRn an umbrella shade over these streets. Residential buildings will be set back to allow for gardens between the �t buildings and the public right-of-way. r r r y T �t �1��� f R, j N Y7 r'� I 1� �b' y Vn1Y Ir S :.M .ed�� u' f f y i te �r Y af1i� ORRm i .#y$,?,wut.�. .S ��z I 7 I F. y i i v� r Y 12.0 ,,6.0, 12.0 12.0 ,6.0,, 12.0 r,. Setbacks allow for urban yard space 2.0 2.� 64.0 RIGHT-OF-WAY Opportunity Site i�taster Plan DevelopmentGuidelines B. III. b. Public Transit Provisions B. III. c. Bicycle/Pedestrian Provisions needs ofthe Opportunity Site. Parking will be provided through a combination of on street The plan envisions strengthening existing public The plan seeks to encourage bicycle and spaces, off-street surface lots, underground lots transit services in the area in order to enhance pedestrian movements and to accommodate and structured ramps to support the mix of uses accessibility and to provide viable choices of these movements in a safe manner. at the core. Parking structures should contribute travel mode for p�rsons who will live, work, and/or to the overall character and image of the recreate in the project area. Three s�ecific features included in the �lan are: Opportunity Site redevelopment area. Three orinci�al transit orovisions in the master a) Multi-use trail that loops through the central Ramp design should include elements, colors and plan are: park area, that extends west to connect with materials that reflect, or complement surrounding the regional trail along Shingle Creek, and buildings. Liner stores or other street level uses a) Frequent bus service along Shingle Creek that connects with the bicycle/pedestrian should be integrated into ramp design along Parkway to and from the Brooklyn Center bridge over TH 100. important street frontages. Transit Station at County Road 10 and Northway Drive. b) Sidewalks along all streets within the project area. b) Bus service along the full length of Summit Drive through the project area. c) Multi-purpose shoulder along Summit Drive that can accommodate performance or c) Attractive, ConvenienUy located bus stops, commuter oriented bicyclists. which include amenities such as shelters whenever possible. "'t' The majority of residents living in the area will be within one block f a transit sto o p �jl ,f,r _,,,s ....n r .�x-. A pedestrian bridge across the central water will link the trail system and provide a visual focal point r B.IV. Parkiiic Stratec J JY r: Balancing the realities of car-related necessities Public Transit will be easily accessible (streets, parking and so on) with future transit Access to parking on the commercial street service and the desired character is a significant challenge. The goal is to provide adequate parking, both quantity and location, while promoting new strategies that support the overall 30 Opportunity Site Master Plan Development Guidelines B. V. Open Space useable green space as integral parts of parcel Guideline Recommendations site design. Parks and open space will be easily accessible to Parkina auidelines encouraoe the followina: all Opportunity Site redevelopment area Guideline ReCOmmendations residents, visitors, people who work here and also Locate off-street surface parking lots away for the citizens of Brooklyn Center and the The Brooklyn Center Opportunity Site will from the major streets, either behind or to the side surrounding area. maintain a high standard for the design of parks of primary buildings and open space within the community. a Provide a combination of fencing, landscaping r s� Open S�ace auidelines encouraae: and landform to screen parking areas from major streets and important views .��-!�iY Partnership with the City to create an integrated, M compreh ive open space system that inks w h a T p existing cty and regional trails and open space It ��1 Private development (block-by-block) to share in the responsibility to provide inviting, innovative R• and useable green space as integral parts of each 7'-- development project Central Open Space The integration of storm water management ?�;r components (meeting water quality and quantity requirements) within both publidprivate park and The overall design framework of the Opportunity Site redevelopment area is based on a central open space improvements. Together, the system of public and semi-public green space will result open space linked to local parks, trails and �°x in enhanced public realm throughout the regional open space. The City of Brooklyn Center will take the lead role in local parks programming, community. Parking lot screening design review, construction sequencing, X implementation and maintenance of key public Create strategies for shared parking between spaces. adjacent uses, taking advantage of peak and off- peak cycles, business hours, nighttime activities, The City will entertain development proposals that "r,,,,,� special events and other needs include a significant open space. The goal is to t "r� link existing parks and trails defined in regional �r ���A 1 Provide facilities or services that respond to park plans with the central park and trails of the r and connect with transit services to reduce Opportunity Site redevelopment area. Of equal re uired arkin includin bic cle lockers and importance is the contribution from each p destrian amenities. 9 y development project to this open space network y b y a d din g a v ari e ty of pr i v a t e, s emi- priv a t e, an d Work with the City to review existing standards additional public space throughout the i..�� �s to provide flexibility including hours for on-street Opportunity Site redevelopment area. Private Quality Green Space for Resident� parking, security and enforcement practices, development and developers will share the permit or metering, responsibility to provide inviting, innovative and 31 Oppo�tunity Site ��,laster Plan Development Guidelines B. VL Storm U�later Manayement The followina obiectives must also be addressed in the final desian: The overall drainage system for the project is Re ional storm water ond. essential to the future performance and function 9 p of the central open space, and for the viability and Reducin the rate of storm water runoff from welfare of the development, and for preserving 9 the capacity and improving the water quality of M the present rate of runoff. the Shingle Creek receiving waters. The project ���.r•� will provide a regional storm water collection area Dual pond system preliminary pond(s) and in the community open space. The pond, which w primary pond. will be the primary visual amenity, will be a two part system. Preliminary ponds will receive storm 4 Emergency overflow of pond to Shingle Creek. water discharge from the storm water collection system. Preliminary ponds and their outlets will Recycle water for project irrigation. be designed to filter the storm water and to improve water quality. Provide fountains to improve water oxygen levels. They will discharge into the primary pond. In addition to controlling the rate of discharge of Work with the DNR to stock pond and promote storm water from the development, thus community fishing program. preserving the capacity of Shingle Creek, the i primary pond will be a valuable aesthetic amenity v i If filling flood zones is necessary, replace flood while serving as a recreational facility. The pond zone volume filled contiguous with other nearby and discharge facilities will be designed to 1% annual chance flood area. minimize the "bounce". The project will comply with City requirements, standards of the Shingle Plant pond edges with nabve plantings to Creek Watershed Management Organization, and discourage geese from using sodded areas. the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's �fi Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas. t� The Central Storm Water pond will beceir<+ a visual Alternative water treatment applications will be amenity a� I explored to minimize capital costs, future maintenance, and improve water quality. Areas Guideline ReCOmmendations that will be inundated by the 1% annual chance flood will be protected. I Integration of the storm water management system and community open space will provide a Y i :;�-s. unique amenity for the development and the City of Brooklyn Center. Design creativity, use of high �`r�-'- quality materials, and addressing safety concems 8f2 C1'itIC21 ObjBCtlV@S t0 b2 8ddfeSSBd. Pond Edges will be planted with native grasses to minimize Geese 32 Opportunity Site MasterP�an DevelopmentGuidelines B. VII. Utilities v i w� A solid network of water distribution and z �1� wastewater collection infrastructure is vital to the 7 i health, safety, welfare, and success of the entire r Study Area. While understanding the location, t�; size, and characteristics of individual utility xr y components is important, development proposals t� must also acknowledge awareness of the entire fi�` X E, l k redevelopment area and areas beyond. i Specifically, the innastructure must address the overall utility system. The project will also be served by a full complement of private utilities including cable television, fiber optic cable, electric, telephone, and SO on. Capacity of Lift Station #9 will need to be increased Guideline ReCOmmendations Work with pertinent private utility companies to ensure timely installation of private utility Remove existing sewer, water, and other infrastructure. infrastructure that will not be incorporated into the new utility systems. Although utilities are not typically seen and are of no aesthetic value, they play a vital role by Provide wastewater collection infrastructure. establishing the needed framework for I development to move forward and to be Install water distribution system for potable sustained. water consumption and for fire protection. All utilities should be buried within City right-of- way and make connections to individual projects from a"back of house" location. All utilities designed according to City standards. Improve capaciry of existing wastewater Lift Station No. 9. 33 Oppoitur�ity Site NlasterPlan Deve�opmen±Guidelines I I Standards for Private Development I v'' M S l. i� i 4 'I f II� -I 5� I( �.v:_ r ��....A OpE��ort�mity Site htaster Plan Development Guidelines C. Standards for Private Development zoning ordinance. It Is the view from 20,000 feet in the air. C. l. Intent of the Standards If Land Use Standards are called the "view Site development standards specify the from 20,000 feet", Architectural Guidelines are relationship between buildings, their edges, the "view from 5 feet." After the overall goals The "Standards for Private DevelopmenY' are streets and public spaCes. They imply a strong prescribed by the Land Use Standards are intended to provide guidance to the selected link between architecture and site, how established, this nearer view, the 5 foot private developer as they begin to design the buildings define the spaces around them, and perspective is needed to ensure that the individual pieces that comprise this the visual and physical connections between design, the details, the quality and the redevelopment plan. The Standards will the private and public realm. Like a zoning craftsmanship of the private components of the assure that the City's overall goals for the ordinance, this section will prescribe allowable development are appropriate to, and reflective redevelopment district are met and that the uses, density, building bulk, height, Floor Area of the overall public goals of the new individual pieces are well integrated to create a Ratio and parking requirements. It will also community. From 20,000 feet in the air, an cohesive new community within the city of regulate the relationship of buildings to streets, $18,000 Chevrolet looks just like a$70,000 Brooklyn Center. These Standards for Private pedestrian ways and open spaces. Normally, Mercedes. But from 5 feet, there are distinct Development deal with the four districts within bulk requirements establish upper limits on the differences in quality, detail and amenities. In the master plan as well as the individual intensity of development in any given district. any development, the quality of the individual buildings within those districts. Since a certain intensity of development will be components and the quality of the details are needed in this project to sustain the public equally as import as the plan Itself. C I. a. Structure of the Standards expenditure in the infrastructure improvements, the requirements for this plan may also specify Unlike guidelines for other projects, these lower limits of bulk and intensity. standards are prepared in a multi-layered l� fas hion. T hey wi l l have t hree dis tin c t bu t i r '��IAJ:.1J�•_.; interrelated parts. Ensuing sections of this document specify the development standards of each Sub-District and in greater detaiL �f They are structured to plainly communicate the i, f' developmenYs requirements in each category below. x::� 4 R �S i� k Sub-District Overview Site Development Standards j Architectural Guidelines xx" Architectural Guidelines control quality a g For each district, a section entitled Distnct F Overview describes the desired characteristics u r and qualities of the district in non-technical, layman's terms. The section entitled Site Development Standards describes each district in standard Site Development Standards describe how buildings language and terms normally associated with a relate to the street 3r Opportunity Site Niaster Plan Development Guitlelines As the guidelines move from the general to the ll specific, the Architectural Guidelines establish separate goals for each sub-district that i s� regulate some or all of the major building and ,r: site components listed below. t Ground Level Expression Fa�ade Transparency Entries and Stoops Upper Story Setbacks �t� ��a Roof Design Rooftop Screening Franchise Architecture f'<����"� Big Box Retailers Lighting Architectural Guidelines control quality Architectural Guidelines control qualiry�� Site Design and Landscaping The Shingle Creek Neighborhood Architectural Guidelines define the desired I quality and standards that are expected for all h Ns This Neighborhood is reserved for high-density, I components within each sub-district. They low and mid rise housing. The district will allow establish the foundation of the architectural In addition to the public open space, there are and encourage the integration of service and/or vision of the community. They may vary four distinct districts available for private restaurant related retail space that is integrated somewhat irom one district to the next but they development. Each of these districts will have into the ground floor of residential buildings. It will strive to establish the guiding principles for a unique character, mix and intensity of use. is the intention of the City that housing be the design of individual components of the plan The districts compliment one another, and o�er occupied. so all will work together as paRs of the whole. define and create the edges of the public open The principles will not be prescriptive. They will space at the center of the redevelopment. The not encourage thematic architecture or the use districts are: of any specific architectural style and genre. Rather they will discuss individual aspects of The Mixed-Use Center design in hopes of establishing standards for quality and good design that can be applied to The Mixed-use Center provides the broadest any style of design. In no order of importance, variety and greatest intensity of development the Principles will deal with: within the Opportunity Site. It will require both vertically and horizontally integrated mix of Scale and Context uses containing multi-level retail as well as Proportion and Massing office and residential uses over ground floor Articulation Structure Organizatio retail uses. It will require public open spaces, Materials and Color streets, sidewalks, plazas etc that encourage Craftsmanship and DetBiling and promote pedestrian activity and that Signage connect it to the public open space. Streetscape and Pedestrian Environment Sustalnability 37 Opportunity Site Master Plan Development Guidelines The Highway 100 District A more detailed description of each of the tour The Highway 100 District allows for but does districts appears in the following sections of not require a mix of uses. Residential or office guideline. use will occupy the "highway frontage" of the district. This district will also allow retail uses C. II. District Guidelines: Mixeci-Use integrated into the ground floor of residential or Center H office buildings. l i C. II. a. Overview: I i '�U (Mixed Use Center) The overarching objective of the Site s Development Guidelines for the Mixed Use a Center is to create a unique opportunity to 0 s F recast typical, suburban commercial Higher density housing facing Shingl development pattems and to focus on the a w--= ro creatiop of anpnnovative� pew urban Residential facing Summit Drive develo ment attem that romotes rlchness I The Parkway Neighborhood and vanery in the bwlt e v onme t. The Paricway Neighborhood is a residential neighborhood characterized by medium density The Mixed-Use Center will provide the broadest housing in low to mid rise, multi-level, multi- variety, highest density and greatest intensity of resident buildings or in urban townhomes. development within the Opportunity Site. It will r encourage both vertical and horizontal integration of uses and promote pedestrian �"'"'"'�-��;�+t'` circulation within the district. Major retailers, supporting services, lifestyle and impulse f retailers and their related parking facilities will be encouraged to locate in multi-level, mixed a� t,�' use and interconnected buildings. In addition to 7 this vital mix, the guidelines for the Mixed Use ti Center will describe the qualities and character v ��t� F of a desired 'urban form' within the Mixed-Use Center. t 'i e t Compact buildings and high-density blocks that 'E'� define this district must include continuous built t� 1�. f'• .;L� r. edges that relate directly to streets and Front doors facing the parkway sidewalks. The Mixed-Use Center must incorporate innovative parking strategies that support the mix of use and that provide easy access to shopping destinations, restaurant and entertainment venues. Together these elements will create a core area that is the center of 38 Opportunity Site Master Plan DevelopmNnt Guidelines activity the place to see and to be seen within uses, such as service and delivery spaces will facades towards major streets. Buildings the Opportunity Site. be allowed but located away from pedestrian should be 4sided architecture. oriented storefronts. Building Placement and Setbacks :,rl�;� High-density housing and office uses on the (Mixed Use Center) upper floors are encouraged. Except for entry lobbies, pure office uses and pure residential 7'�= uses will be prohibited from the ground floor of Buildings should be located at the build-to buildings in this district. lines (zero setback), but allow recessed spaces f s for outdoor dining, front doors, other street level activities and variety of pedestrian environment. r��. =t 80% of building facades should address the „f,� f build-to lines. r i A: r Great emphasis should be iven to buildmg 9 features located at primary intersections or .�-ai where streets intersect with the central open �e.;�,�� space. These locations will be seen irom Great streets for people and business several directions and terminate views. They will become future landmarks and These objectives require that the majority of orientation/way finding icons as the Opportunity buildin s front on rima streets and Site develops. 9 P ry hA�x��_1 r,u�Jd����s wrth �tail on first floor pedestrian thoroughfares that may be part of the redevelopment plan and may connect and Surface parking is to be confined to the bare relate to public open spaces. minimum required for immediate passenger Parking and service areas should be located drop-off and pick-up. District parking structures will be encouraged. Quick-stop parking needs internal to or on the sides of buildings, away such as dry cleaners and coffee shops or from view. A mix of uses within individual angled parking on public or private streets also blocks, including retail, restaurant and be encouraged but will be reviewed or �•Y residential, will further enhance this model and s�',�; e considered on an individual basis. _.�,�»l� 1 romote activi throu hout much of the da ,a P tY 9 Y and evening hours. Site development guidelines Inclusion of civic entertainment restaurant include the following: and performance uses is encouraged. Strong :�n`�` I 4a pedestrian relationships between these "public" I Characteristics uses and the central street is required. (Mixed Use Center) Special considerations for "Big Box 8rtd Corner buildings with character The ground floor of all buildings will be limited to "Franchise" retailers. These larger square foot retail and restaurant uses only. Street level retailers will be considered on a conditional Minimize openings between buildings. development will be designed with storeftonts, basis. Larger box retailers should wrap Limited driveway access and provislons for entrances, windows and related streetscapes to buildings with in-line shops, provide structured pedestrian connections through blocks are encourage the greatest level of pedestrian parking to minimize large surface lots and orient encouraged. Gaps between buildings to circulation and traffic as is possible. Ancillary accommodate surface parking lots, greater 39 Opportunity Site I�lasterPlan DevelopmentGuidelines building setbacks or other purposes are Encourage driveway access to parking frontage must be built out to the built-to line or discouraged facilities along side streets in order to maintain lot line. Where buildings front on common a pedestrian friendly environment and to areas, pedestrian ways or other open spaces, Encourage recessed entries and windows to maximize on-street parking within the Mixed- 80% building facades must be built to the open create street-level interest, variety and enhance Use Center. space line. Driveways to parking structures and pedestrian scale along street frontage access drives to senrice areas are excepted. Sicie Yard Setbacks: None. Subjectto individual review. Rear Yard Setback: None. Subjectto z s individual review. w vt y i Floor Area Ratio: By individual review, but multi-story buildings are encouraged throughout �;.j ri,: the Center. Free standing, single story �f; buildi are not allowed. y x I �'�y� '_'"i Mini���urn Buildi�ic; Hei�ht 32ft. Recessed or comer entries add visual interest Maximum Builcliny Height' Five floors or 75 ft. Subject to individual review. Parking Strategies pf* Stree; �arkii�g- Retaill�ffice: Parking (Mixed Use Center) facilities within the Mixed Use Center will be Pedestrian connection from parking to retail subject to individual review. The overarching Provide required parking spaces for daily use strategy is allow a maximum of 5% of the that satisfies both quantity and location needs C, II. b. Site Development Stanclards required retail parking demand in surface lots. through a mix of on street and structured With clear ublic u ose bein demonstrated, parking solutions with a minimum of small (Mixed Use Center) p P� 9 surface lots. parking facilities for the remainder of retail and public uses will be considered to be part of the Allowak�le Larid Use; Retail, office and high public infrastructure and may be co-developed Encourage shared, district or municipal density residential uses are all allowed in the with City participation. Shared or "district" parking facilities that minimize total parking Mixed Use Center. With the exception of office parking facilities will be encouraged. numbers by taking advantage of around the or residential lobbies, retail and restaurant uses clock and peak/off-peak hours of operation for should comprise the entire ground floor of all various uses within the core area non-parking or transit related buildings. Off Streei Parking Residential: Private and secure parkin for residences within the 9 Locate any surface parking lots away from the Minimum Lot Area: NA Center will be fully enclosed in private facilities. major streets, either behind or to the side of Guest parking may be accommodated in public primary buildings; surface parking lots along Minimum Lot Width/Depth: NA structures or on-street. Parking demand will be major street frontage are not allowed in the core market driven and subject to individual review. area Front Build-to Lines; On County Road 10 A minimum of one space per bedroom is and Shingle Creek Parkway, 80% of the lot anticipated. 40 Opportunit} Si[e ��,1�3st�°rPl.�3n De�vel��pment Guidelinr; C. II. c. Architectural Guidelines (Mixed Use Center) Designs should minimize blank walls along Scale, Proportion and Height the public rights-of-way and should consider all (Mixed Use Center) Buiiding Character and Expression: street frontages, including buildings at comers, (Mixed Use Center) as primary elevations. Articulate front fa�ades with projections and Em hasize trans y recesses Buildings in the Mixed Use Center will play a P parenc at street level to major role in defining the overall character of encourage two way viewing both window Encourage increased building height, higher the district. The proposed mix of uses for this shopping and 'eyes on the streeY density and larger scale buildings adjacent to signature destination suggests the potential for the Central Street i a variety of building types, demanding creativity Promote interesting, animated architectural and innovation to highlight unique architecture, features without being thematic or artificial. Street Presence while knitting the entire district together as a Faux decorative elements are discouraged �Mixed Use Center) coherent whole. Overall building design is an important consideration, but emphasis on first Avoid large, unarticulated fapades floor fa�ade treatments is essential to Emphasize pedestrian experience with encourage street-level activity and enhance the Emphasize important intersections by placing architectural features at street level canopies, pedestrian experience. Architecture to be '4 distinctive architectural elements or interesting decorative light fixtures and material detail sided' at all locations visible to public areas. fa�ades at these prominent locations Emphasis is to be on creating highly animated design solutions along all street frontages and Provide a variety oi front elevations for rows pedestnan ways. Architectural guidelines of buildings along any given block include the following: Provide a variety of building types and styles, expressed both in large scale (overall building) and small scale (design details) i 6 f -1 g �1r� j. ^r�' 1 n, ��I. 1 i: l. Y �tI r 1s9"}-- t t II I I f r// ..M f i II t e 6 y 3 yr1�±!I�� y� r x r j x v:;'.,, T Vary fa�ade treatments as is shown above but allow for additional recesses and projections. The fa�ade plane Is too consistent in this picture. N j� J A variety of architectural styles adds interest Emphasize details at street level di Opportimity Site Master Plan Development Guidelines Encoueage variety of color, texture and Use clear or lightly tinted glass for all Encourage overhead projections, either as a materials to complement other streetscape windows and doors mirrored, reflective or specific building component or as elements highly tinted glazing is not acceptable permanenUtemporary canopies Select materials that relate to the building use, Conceal service entries, loading facilities and Provide primary access doors facing public not artificially contrived or themed mechanital services from view along public streets streets Include small scale elements, variety of Materials materials and careful detailing to support street Create a continuous building edge along (Mixed Use Center) level activities and enhance the pedestrian street frontage, visually conneCting adjacent experience buildings with complementary fa�ade Provide a diverse mix of materials, applied in treatments a variety of proportions, exposures and detailing Streetscape within a block, or along a street (Mixed Use Center) Windows and Doors (Mixed Use Center) Encourage durable, high quality materials. Provide gracious sidewalk width to invite pedestrian traffic. Maximiie glass openings for all ground level, street front fa�ades especially for retail, �I Install street trees to frame the street and restaurant �nd other commerCi81 uses provide shade. Trees should be coordinated recommend 50% minimum ot total ground level f� �,r with proposed architecture and provide a fa�ade, or demonstrate great design through ti consistent character along the street edge. other means ,j� Provide street lighting that meets all safety j� standards and design criteria, while creating a e. unique character for this district. Coordinate �a with City of Brooklyn Center on style and future r maintenance considerations. i W e w• Explore street light spacing, height and a f� var ety of fixture type hat would support f i t f_ propose d mix o f uses an d a c tivi ties (no te, T however, that too much light is as bad as too r a 7 Emphasize use of high quality materials little) Siding is not allowed (vinyl, metal, wood) except as a complimentary use Emphasfze trans�ar�ncy at street level Encourage the use of mostly bnck or N�ov�a� real window openinq5 for all street comparable alternative; minimum requirement facing far,ades above ground level of 50% of non-glazed wall area recommend 40% minimum of tptal fagade Metal and wood components are acceptable Provide recessed entries wherever possible as a complimentary use 42 Opportunity Site MasterPlan DevelopmentGuidelinEs r w T a C. III. District Guidelines (Shingle Creek Neighborhood) Y E 5 1 "N' C. III. a. Overvie�fv j (Shingle Creek Neighborhood) 4 F� .'�r- ,q v;ti The Shin le Creek Nei hborhood will be -r z 9 9 >��`�:r tt:� dominated by high-density and medium density t J��. �1'. r 1 x residential developments in low-rise buildings of �iO��' three four and five stories. Buildings fronting on l' i-,� �.�a i� a�;. y corners on Shingle Creek Parkway may contain service and restaurant related retail spaces on the ground floor comers only. Housing density will range from 35 to 60 units per acre. Characteristics Residential Courtyards provide p�vate spaCe r c (Shin le Creek Nei hborhood 9 9 Prima edestrian entnes and lobbies rY P t should orient toward the arkwa but should in °r� p Y All resident parking shall be enGosed in y� no way limit secondary access. Access To I underground garages or, if ground water levels resident parking should be from side streets as prohibit this, in small footprint, multi-level decks much as is possible. Non residen6al entries that begin at the high water level. In this case, may be accessed from Shingle Creek Parkway. Fumishings, landscaping, lighting, paving and parking structures shall be located at the interior si na e create a ualit environment Access to formal drop-offs may be from the new 9 9 4 Y of the sites and "wrapped" with residential parkway. No vehicle access from Shingle buildings so as to be as inconspicuous as Creek Parkway will be allowed. Implement high quality streetscape possible. Guest parking should be on-street or improvements including special pavements, located in small lots of no more than 20 cars Setbacks from Shingle Creek Parkway interesting concrete tinting or scoring patterns, each accessed from side streets only. Parking should be consistent at 30 feet. Setbacks from plantings that emphasize year round interest, for retail uses should be in small lots of no more the new parkway at the second floor should be ornamental fencing, signage and other features than 40 cars each, must not front on either consistent. All buildings should be required to (note, however, that simpler is better and too parkway and should be accessed from side have some portion that extends to exactly 25 much clutter is a negative). Coordinate with the streets only. feet from the parkway. All ground floor units City of Brooklyn Center on the future oriented toward the new Parkway should have maintenance of elements within proposed street private courtyards within and in-between stoops or porches. Ground floor stoops at the ROW. buildings and opening toward the new parkway first floor should have a consistent setback of will be encouraged. If appropriate, courtyards exactly 18 feet. facing Shingle Creek may be envisioned. I Additional setbacks from specific side streets that form the public gateways to the Community Open Space will also be required. t3 OppoRimity Site MasterPlan DevelopinentGuidelines Residential Courts and Private Green Front Build-to Lines: On Shingle Creek SpaCe Parkway, primary building facades should be (Shingle Creek Neighborhood) consistent at the built-to line. Build-to line shall be 20 ft. behind the public sidewalk. Ground floor stoo s ste or orches ma extend to 10 ft There are many opportunities to integrate 1N i p p p y privately owned and maintained courtyards and from the sidewalk. Setbacks from the built-to ocket arks within this district. These small- "�s� line for courtyards or other recesses shall not P P r d com rise more than 40°/a of Shin le Creek scale greens provide important 'breathing p 9 space, contribute to storm water management faqade. and offer additional amenities to serve residents, building tenants and adjacent uses. j On the Paricway Road, primary building facades They can help create great variety in y should be consistent at the build-to line. Build- architectural expression within the district and J_�:� to line shall be 15 ft behind the public sidewalk. on its public edges. Residential Parking tucks under building Ground floo� stoops, steps or porches may extend to 7/: feet from the sidewalk. Setbacks from the build-to line shall not comprise more StreeUsidewalk and Streetscape Parking spaces for ancillary retail should be than 55°/a of the Parkway Road fa�ade. Elements provided through a combination of on-street and (Shingle Creek Neighborhood) surFace lot parking solutions. All buildings must be built to the build-to lines at Minimize surface parking lots fronting on all street corners. Destination streets and connector streets must Shingle Creek Parkway and the Paricway Road, balance a high level of service for the Side Street Seti�acks: Build-to lines on side automobile with attractive and inviting amenities buffer surface paricing lots from the side streets, either behind or to the side of buildings streets between Shingle Creek Parkway and for the pedestrian, including: the Parkway Road shall be 5 ft. behind the back No more than 25% of street frontage can be of the public sidewalk. Recesses shall not Parking Strategies utilized for surface parking lots comprise more than 40% of the far,ade. (Shingle Creek Neighborhood) Driveways are excepted. All resident parking must be enclosed in C, II I, b. Site Developn�ent All buildings must be built to the build-to lines at C� r below grade garages or garages that are S all comers. internal to the sites. Careful consideration (Shingle Creek Neighborhood) should be given to the level of ground water o� Rear Yarci Setbacks: NA the site to minimize long term maintenance Li4ic:�ra�t;ie ��grr.� +.;s+> High density concerns of below grade features. residential. Ancillary, ground floor restaurant or service related retail. lnternai Side Yard Setbacks: 25 feet from an adjoining residential property. fV�aximum Lot Area: NA Minimum Residential Density: 35 units per acre. 1,250 square feeUdwelling unit. Minimum Lot Area: All lots shall be full depth from Shingle Creek Parkway to "Park Maximum Residential Density: 60 units Side Road". per acre. 700 square feeUdwelling unit. OppoRunity Sit� Master Plan Development Guideline� Maximum Retaif Density: Ground floor Provide a variety of front elevations for rows stoops, steps porches awnings canopies, retail or restaurant space shall be limited to of buildings along any given block decorative light fixtures and material details. 50% of the ground floor, floor area and by adequacy of parking only. See below. Encourage variety of color, texture and 1�i materials to complement other streetscape Buiidin� Fisight: Building height in the r/' elements Shingle Creek District shall be limited to five r stones or 75 feet. !r� f� Conceal service entries, loading facilities and mechanical services from view along public p� streets as much as possible Off Street Parking-Re�ir�ential: Private f and secure parking for residences within the F t i;��- Create a continuous building edge for the Core will be fully enclosed in private facilities. majority of street frontage, visually connecting Guest pa r king may be accommo date d in pu b lic i adjacent buildings with complimentary fa�ade structures or on-street. Parking demand will be t f� treatments in limited areas where gaps occur, market driven and subject to individual review. architectural treatments, windows and detailing A minimum of one space per bedroom is of side far,ades should match front fa�ade anticipated. �r Street level far,ade varies Window and Doors Off Street r arking-Retail� Parking SCale, Pro ortion and Hei ht (Shingle Creek Neighborhood) numbers, placement and access for ancillary P 9 i retail subject to individual review and approval. (Shingle Creek Neighborhood) Maximize glass openings for all ground level, street front fa des es eciall for retail P Y C. I I I. c. A r: i r• r a! i d e I i���� Articulate front far,ades with projections and restaurant and other commercial uses. (Shingle Creek Neighborhood) recesses Provide real window openings for all street Encourage increased building height and facing fa�ades Building Character and Expression: larger scale buildings adjacent to Shingle Creek (Shingle Creek Neighborhood) Parkway Provide recessed entries wherever possible Emphasize transparency of retail uses at Promote a minimum of three four stories in street level to encourage two way viewing this sub-district, lower buildings are acceptable; Use clear or lightly tinted glass for all both window shopping and eyes on the street continuous height rooflines should not dominate windows and doors mirrored, reflective or any street frontage. highly tinted glazing is unacceptable; faux Promote interesting, animated architectural windows are not allowed features without being thematic or artificial Encourage upper level setbacks and variety faux decorative elements are discouraged of roof edge treatments. Provide primary access doors facing public streets Avoid large, unarticulated fa�ades Street Presence Emphasize important intersections by placing (Shingle Creek Neighborhood) distinctive architectural elements or interesting Emphasize pedestrian experience with fa�ades at these prominent locations. architectural features at streat level including �J Opportunity Site MasterPlan DevelopmentGuidelines Avoid overly complex or arbitrary use of proposed mix of uses and activities (note, materials however, that too much light is as bad as too little) Include smaller scale elements, variety of materials and careful detailing to support street implement a range of options for streetscape level activities and enhance the pedestrian improvements including special pavements, g experience interesting concrete tinting or scoring pattems, additional plantings, ornamental fencing and q� other features note, however, that sim ler is Streetscape p y, 1 (Shingle Creek Neighborhood) better and too much clutter is a negative). Residential district streetscaping should complement the mixed-use center but should Provide gracious sidewalk design to invite be seen as much more green than the urban �r"° pedestnan traffic solution of the mixed-use center. Front door faces the street Install street trees to frame the street and Materials provide shade. All sidewalk areas shall have (Shingle Creek Neighborhood) streets trees to emphasize the pedestrian character of the development. Provide a diverse mlx of materials, applied in a variety of proportions, exposures and detailing Y""; r within a block, or along a street u',.�?� k: Encourage durable, high quality materials :4` local sources if available ��.R i, y l. Siding is not allowed (vinyl, metal, wood) ar..• except as a complimentary use Encourage the use of mostly brick or comparable altemative; minimum requirement A of 50% of non-glazed wall area '����,.,s I �,t_, Metal and wood components are acceptable as a complimentary use Street trees provide shade buffer traffic Accommodate changes in material as follows retum 8 foot minimum at side walls and avoid Provide street lighting that meets all safery terminating in the same plane standards and design criteria, while creating a unique character for this district. Coordinate Encourage ovefiead projections, either as a with City of Brooklyn Center on style and future specific building component or as maintenance considerations. permanenUtemporary Canopies Explore street light spacing, height and a variety of fixture type that would support 4B Opportunity Site Master Plan Development Guidelines C. �V. The Parkway Neiyhborhood Street/sidewalkand Streetscape Elements C. IV, a. Overview: (Parkway Neighborhood) Parkwa Nei hborhood l Y 9 F�� s�•t� i; Destination streets and connector streets must i R:`.' r balance a high level of service for the Characteristics (Parkway Neighborhood) i automobile with attractive and inviting amenities for the pedestrian. �ha�� '�,'�k,.•* �n Ct�� The Parkway Neighborhood is a pure housing 4 r neighborhood consisting of inedium density r r'''� f Parkin Strate ies: s� 9 9 housing at 15 to 40 units per acre and urban i z�� (Parlcway Neighborhood) townhomes at 12 to 25 units per acre. Although roof forms may vary greatly, building heights will All resident parking must be enclosed in be predominate ly t hree stories. I« T below grade garages or garages that are Retail uses in the Parkway neighborhood will be Courtyards and green space enhance livability internal to the sites. allowed on a conditional use basis and limited to small neighborhood, service and All parking for dwelling units in this district shall u convenience retailers such as dry cleaners, be in underground garages or, as in the Shingle dairies and the like. Retail uses will not be Creek District, in mid-block garages set above allowed to stand alone. They will be allowed high ground water elevations. only on a"conditional use" basis and only if they Private courtyards will be encouraged as in the r are integrated into the ground floor of residential Shingle Creek District. buildings. Retail entnes and storefronts will be restncted to the Summit Drive street frontage Residential courts and private green u• only. The size of any retail spaces in any one space building will be such that they will not require (Parkway Neighborhood) any more than 20 pal'king spaCes each. Any High water table may require above gicund parking such parking shall be accessed from Summit There are many opportunities to integrate garages Drive only. privately owned and maintained courtyards and pocket parks within this sub-district. These Parking spaces for ancillary retail should be small-scale greens provide important 'breathing provided through a combination of on-street and space, contribute to storm water management surface parking lots. and offer additional amenities to serve residents, building tenants and adjacent uses. Surface parking lots may not front on primary They can help create great variety in streets. Locate surface parking lots on side architectural expression within the district and streets only. No more than 25% of street on its public edges. frontage can be utilized for surface parking lots a� Opportunity Site Master Plan Development Guidelines C. IV. b. Site DeveloE�rnent Standards: C. IV. c. Architer.tural Gui<lelines: (Parkway Neighborhood) Rear Yard Setbacks: NA (Parkway Neighborhood) F�,ilowabfe Land Use: Medium density Internai �icie Yard Setl�acks: 25 feet from Building Charactel' and Expression residential. Ancillary, ground floor service retail an adjoining residential property. (Parkway Neighborhood) only on a conditional- use basis. Minimuin Resident+al Density: 15 units Promote interesting, animated architectural Maximum Lot Area: NA per acre. 2,200 sf/dwelling unit. features without being thematic or artificial faux decorative elements are discouraged Minimum Lot Area: All lots shall be full Maximum Residentiai Density: 40 units depth from Summit Dnve to "Park Side Road". per acre. 1,000 sf/dwelling unit. Ground floor s retail space shall be limited by adequacy of +�i,,. ,�r, Front Buiici-tc i ir.es. On Summit Drive, parking only. See below. primary building facades should be placed consistenUy at the built-to line. Build-to line Buildinc� Heigi�t Building height in the shall be 20 ft. behind the public sidewalk. Paricway district shall not exceed four stones or Ground floor stoops step or porches may 60 feet. _►`g _W'1 extend to 10 ft from the sidewalk. Setbacks ���-91 F� from the built-to line for courtyards or other Uff Street Parkin Residential Private a! ■�I ��II recesses shall not comprise more than 40% of and secure arkin for residences within the I Summit Dnve fa�ade. p 9 Core will be fully enclosed in private facilities. On "Park Side Road", primary building facades Guest parking may be accommodated on-street or, upon review, in small private lots of no more should be placed consistently at the build-to than 20 cars each. Parking demand will be Provide interesting fa�ade treatments that emphasi2e line. Build-to line shall be 15 ft behind the market driven and subject to individual review. the street level public sidewalk. Ground floor stoops, steps or A minimum of one space per bedroom is porches may extend to 7'/z feet from the anticipated. Avoid large, unarticulated fa�ades sidewalk. Setbacks from the build-to line shall not comprise more than 55% of the "Park Side Road" fapade. Off Street Parking-Retail� Parlcing Emphasize important intersections by placing numbers, placement and access for ancillary distinctive architectural elements or interesting retail will be sub'ect to individual review and fa�ades at these prominent locations. All buildings must be built to the build-to lines at all street comers. approval. Provide a variety of front elevations for rows of buildings along any given block Siue Street Set4���rcks: Build-to lines on side streets befinreen Summit Drive and Park Side Road shall be 5 ft. behind the back of the public sidewalk. Recesses shall not comprise more than 40% of the fa�ade. Driveways are accepted. All buildings must be built to the build-to lines at all corners. 48 Opportunity Site NlasterF'lan DevelopmentGuidelines Scale, Proportion and Height F (Parkway Neighborhood) Articulate front fa�ades with projections and ��z� recesses t a` Promote a maximum of three stories in this district, lower buildings are acceptable; e�:�*'� continuous height rooflines should not dominate m any street frontage. Encourage upper level setbacks and variety B r��i! of roof edge treatments. A��� b�' Front porches engage the street I s y, Street Presence r� i' Provide front porch entries wherever possible (Parkway Neighborhood) x' f I� I Use clear or lightly tinted glass for all Emphasize pedestrian expenence with f;: windows and doors mirrored, reflective or architectural features at street level including highly tinted glazing is unacceptable; faux I stoops, steps porches awnings canopies, windows are not allowed I, decorative light fixtures and material details. i Provide primary access doors facing public Conceal service entries, loading facilities and streets mechanical services from view along public streets as much as possible Materials A variety of color and texture can add interest (parkway Neighborhood) Create a continuous building edge for the majonty of street frontage, visually connecting Window and Doors Provide a diverse mix of materials, applied in adjacent buildings with complimentary fa�ade (Parkway Neighborhood) a variety of proportions, exposures and detailing treatments in limited areas where gaps occur, within a block, or alonq a street architectural treatments, windows and detailing Maximize glass openings for all ground level, of side fa�ades should match front fa�ade street front fa�ades, especially for retail, Encourage durable, high quality materials restaurant and other commercial uses. local sources if available Encourage variety of color, te�ure and materials to complement other streetscape Provide real window openings for all street Siding is not allowed (vinyl, metal, wood) elements facing fa�ades except as a complimentary use Encourage the use of mostly brick or comparable alternative; minimum requirement of 50% of non-glazed wall area Metal and wood components are acceptable as a complimentary use Opportunity Site Master Plan Development Guidelines Accommodate changes in material as follows Provide street lighting that meets all safety retum 8 foot minimum at side walls and avoid standards and design criteria, while creating a terminating in the same plane unique character for this district Encourage overhead projections, either as a Explore street light spacing, height and a specific building component or as variety of fixture type that would support permanenUtemporary canopies proposed mix of uses and activities Avoid overly complex or arbitrary use of Explore a range of options for streetscape materials improvements including special pavements, interesting concrete tinting or scoring patterns, Include smaller scale elements, variety of additional plantings, ornamental fencing and materials and careful detailing to support street other features (note, however, that simpler is level activities and enhance the pedestrian better and too much clutter is a negative) experience Streetscape (Parkway Neighborhood) Provide gracious sidewalk design to invite pedestrian traffic Install street trees to frame the sVeet and provide shade r''�r r° �N P t'" 4� ��a .�r'* .r� a�. 1 i:. �r�t t- °:,iu� Street trees and landsrapirig enhance the sidewalk Opportunity Site MasterPlan DevelopmentGuicielin�-, G. V. Highway 100 District suggest the potential for a campus-like Road. Driveways will be located on Summit arrangement of buildings on some blocks. Drive, but should be minimized by interior site C. V, a. Overview These blocks should be more internally oriented circulation. (Highway 100 District) than in other districts, with driveways, parking lots, courtyards and walkway connections in the center, ringed by buildings around the outside. The Highway District allows for but does not require a mix of uses. Ground to sky residential Yet, buildings must still address adjacent uses will front on the Public Open Space. streets, with both primary and secondary entries Residential or office use will occupy the provided to animate these important fa�ades, h i h w a f r o n t a e" o f t h e d i s t n c t. T h i s e a s t s i d e f 9 Y 9 pa rticu lar ly a long Summi t Drive an d t he o f t he dis tri c t wi l l a lso a l low retai l uses Frontage Road. While this distnct encourages a f( �I integrated into the ground floor of residential or dynamic i office buildings. r Mix of uses, this objective will likely occur r I Buildings in the Sub-district also make a mostly within blocks, not within individual significant contribution to first impressions as buildings as seen in other districts. Site w people enter the Town Center from Highway development characteristics include the 100, the John Martin bridge or Summit Drive. following: y As such, the easterly buildings in the Highway Distrid form gateways at the major entries into s E° s�_���,rr,�t o��ve the site. Architectural elements and massing of CharaCte�istiCS: structures begin to define the feeling and (Highway 100 District) Housing uses that occur within the Highway character of the entire place. 100 District will be high density or medium The Highway 100 District will allow both density. They may be located over multi-level Residential uses and Office uses as well as office uses or over ancillary retail uses located �M �'��P mixed-use, Office/Residential buildings. The on the ground. exact nature and final configuration of the mix '-.�t��� will be market dnven. Parking for all residential uses shall be enGosed as in other residential districts s Any office uses that may occur shall place their building mass near the Frontage Road Building height of office and residential uses L{ boun dary o f t he si te. Anci l lary re tai l uses may on t he Summit Drive frontage wi l l be limite d to I occur on the first floor of office buildings. four stories or 50 feet, which ever is greater. Building heights along the Frontage Road will Office uses will be re uired to enclose all of Office uses should be constructed with quality q be limlted to 180 feet. materials their required parking, except visitor parking, in above grade, shared parking structures or in The required building setback irom Summit The proposed mix of uses within this district bel�ow grade private structures. A maximum of Drive for some portion of all buildings shall be suggests a variery of potential building types. 0/o of the required parking may be in surface no greater than 20 feet. Setbacks at private Blending office uses with retail storefronts and lots. courtyards, passenger drop-offs and building housing demands design creativity and lobbies for either office or residential uses may innovation in order to knit the entire sub-district Office parking and service related vehicular be greater. together as a coherent whole. The mix of office circulation shall be required to locate their and residential uses in this sub-district also access points on side streets or the Frontage 51 Opportunity Site P:l�ster Plan Develo��ment Guidelines Land Use Buildings should be placed at all four corners Street/sidewalk and Streetscape (Highway 100 District) of key intersections Elements (Highway 100 District) Encourage high intensity office and residential Greater emphasis should be given to uses to locate along the Highway 100 frontage architectural elements, materials and other Destination streets and connector streets must road. On the easterly office/residential sites, design features for buildings located at John balance a high level of service for the encourage residential development, perhaps Martin Drive and Summit Drive. Emphasis automobile with attractive and inviting amenities targeting senior housing and some rental units should also be given to the entry on John Martin for the pedestrian. at the Summit Drive frontage. Drive from Highway 100. Buildin Placement Residential courts and private green Parking Strategies 9 (Highway 100 District) (Highway 100 District) spaCe (Highway 100 District) All office parking must be contained in Generally, buildings should be located at the There are many opportunities to integrate parking structures and within well screened build-to lines, allowing recessed areas for privately owned and maintained courtyards and surface lots. building entries; no more than 60% of building pocket parks within this sub�iistrict. These shall beyond maximum setback small-scale greens provide important 'breathing Surface parking for office visitors and short space, contribute to storm water management term passenger drop off should be provided in and offer additional amenities to serve small surface lots. residents, bullding tenants and adjacent uses. They can help create great variety in All resident parking must be enclosed in architectural expression within the district and below grade garages or garages that are �y� on its public edges. internal to the sites. T �.�a Parking spaces for ancillary retail should be T provided through a combination of on-street and small surface parking lots. i SurFace parking lots may not front on primary �F streets. Locate surface parking lots on side ti h A` streets only. No more than 25% of street r t�����,� frontage can be utilized for surface parking lots n►�Rn �i .��:r .3, iv �l!l��tl� f j, 9d t�2,'��f�'����,����. fI ���'�x t ,a i�� cs_ .-t':..4 V j t I s ��7�' 3[ �F y n R Office buildings should face the Summit Drive �i�6�'�.�4r���� Residential green space brings added value 52 Opport�unity Site h�aster°lan DevelopmentGuidelines V. b. Site Development Star�dards: y: �.�.�w`���� Side Street Sett�acks: Build-to lines on side Highway 100 District streets, both between Summit Drive and Park �#,�e�i •,y� Side Road and between Summit Drive and t� p;�,� Frontage Road shall be 5 ft. behind the back of Afiowable Land Jse: High and medium �a density residential on all westerly sites between s the public sidewalk. Recesses shall not y-> 6 comprise more than 40% of the fa�ade. For the Park Side Road and Summit Drive. Offices with easterly office/residential sites, driveways and ancillary, ground floor retail, restaurant and small surface parking lots are accepted. service retail on all easterly sites between Y-�- n.� r Summit Drive and the Frontage Road. �-,!::,111, m "o�"' f:; All buildings must be built to the build-to lines at all corners. Maximum yot Area NA 1 S' i4'I��iim�,r!; i.ot Are<� All lots shall be full d �ear Yard Setbacks: NA depth. For the Westeriy sites, lots shall not be divided between the Parkway and Summit a��' Setback5: 25 feet from Drive. For the Easterly sites, lots shall not be an adjoining residential or office property. divided between Summit Dnve and the �tial Density 30 units Frontage Road per acre. 1,450 sf/dwelling unit. Front Build�-to Lines� On "the Parkway", Maximum Residential Density 60 units pnmary building facades should be placed per acre. 700 sf/dwelling unit. consistenUy at the build-to line. Build-to line shall be 15 ft behind the public sidewalk. f The density of office and Ground floor stoops, steps or porches may ancillary retail uses shall be limited to a Floor extend to 7'h feet from the sidewalk. On Area Ratio of 0.75 for 3 stories, 0.80 for 4 Summit Dnve, pnmary building facades for the easterly office/residential sites should be placed stories 0.85 for 5 stories, and 0.90 for 6 stories i or by an overall height limitation of 95 feet. consistently at the built-to line. Build-to line Setbacks allow for front yard space and an �mpro�ed Shall be 20 ft. behind the publiC Sidewalk. streetscape for Summit Drive Ground floor stoops, step or porches may F?etaf! [7e�;sitv� Ground floor retail space extend to 10 ft from the sidewalk. Setbacks On Frontage Road, primary building facades shall be limited by adequacy of parking only. from the built-to line for courtyards or other should be placed consistently at the build-to See below. recesses shall not comprise more than 40% of line. Build-to line shall be at the back of the Summit Drive fa�ade. public sidewalk. Setbacks from the build-to line Building Heiyht-Residentiaf: Four stories for passenger drop-off areas, driveways and or 50 feet. small surface parking lots shall not comprise more than 60% of the Frontage Road fa�ade. Buildir�g Height-Office: 95 feet between Summit Drive and the Frontage Road only. All All buildings must be built to the build-to lines at other sites shall comply with the residential all street comers. standard. 53 Opport�u�ity Site Masrer Plan Development Guidelines C)ff �tre�t F'arking Res�c�ential: Private and secure parking for residences within the f Articulate front fa�ades with projections and Core will be fully enclosed in private facilities. recesses Guest parking may be accommodated on-street or, upon review, in small private lots of no more Encourage increased building height, higher than 20 cars each. Parking demand will be density and larger scale buildings adjacent to market driven and subject to individual review. the Civic Square 2nd Downtown Commons A minimum of one space per bedroom is �ir anticipated. Promote multiple stories in this sub�listrict, but occasional single story buildings are �if� �*,re�§ �ar�c=r c= �rfice'Ret�if� Parking R acceptable; continuous height rooflines and for office uses shall be provide at a minimum of single story buildings should not dominate any 1 space per 200 rentable square feet of office street frontage and should be a minimum of 18 space unless specifically approved otherwise. feet to the roofline Individual offices buildings and related retail Proposals should balance attention to detail and uses will be encouraged to share parking in overall site planning excellence Street PreseflG@ "district" or shared parking structures that are Avoid large, unbroken fa�ades (Highway 100 District) located beneath or beside buildings and away from the primary streets. A maximum of ten Emphasize transparency at street level to Emphasize pedestrian experience with percent of the total office and retail parking encourage two way viewing both window architectural features at street level canopies, demand may be located in surface parking lots. shopping and eyes on the street decorative light fixtures and material detail Emphasize important intersections and other Off Stre��i �'a�king-R��=a�l Parking nodes by placing distinctive architectural numbers, placement and access for ancillary elements or interesting fagades at these retail will be subject to individual review and prominent locations approval. I Provide a variety of front elevations for rows C. V. c. Architectural Guidelines ofbuildings along anygiven block N+ghway 100 District a: Promote interesting, animated architectural �.t:..a Building Character and Expression features without being thematic or artificial g _.f R� (Highway 100 District) faux decorative elements are discouraged :t Provide a variety of building types and styles, Avoid large, unarticulated fa�ades expressed both in large scale (overall building) and small scale (design details) Emphasize important intersections Residential uses and detailing should emphasize the Promote interesting, animated architectural Scale, Proportion Height street �eve� features without being thematic or artificial (Highway 100 District) faux decorative elements are discouraged Encourage variety of color, texture and Provide a variety of building heights along materials to complement other streetscape any given block, perhaps related to changes in elements use or at demising walls 54 Opport�mity Site �;i i5t��r Plan Development Guid?lines i Conceal service entries, loading facilities and Encourage the use of mosUy brick or Streetscape mechanical services from view along public comparable alternative; minimum requirement (Highway 100 District) streets of 35% of non-glazed wall area Provide gracious sidewalk design to invite Create a continuous building edge along Encourage overhead projections, either as a pedestrian traffic street frontage, visually connecting adjacent specific building component or as buildings with complimentary fa�ade treatments permanenUtemporary canopies Install street trees to frame the street and Windows and Doors Avoid overly complex or arbitrary use of provide shade (Highway 100 District) materials Provide street lighting that meets all safety standards and design criteria, while creating a Maximize glass openings for all ground level, unique character for this district street front fa�ades especially for retail, restaurant and other commercial uses Explore street light spacing, height and a recommend 35% minimum of total ground level t variety of fixture type that would support fa�ade, or demonstrate great design through _;a. proposed mix of uses and activities other means �(�r f L i`-; Explore a range of options for streetscape Provide real window openings for all street 4 �1 improvements including special pavements, facing fa�ades above ground level interesting concrete tinting or scoring patterns, recommend 40% minimum of total fagade additional plantings, omamental fencing and other features (note, however, that simpler is Provide recessed entnes wherever possible better and too much Gutter is a negative) Use clear glass for all windows and doors Corner retail uses should be explored mirrored, reflective or highly tinted glazing is Include smaller scale elements, vanety of discouraged materials and careful detailing to support street level activities and enhance the pedestrian I Provide primary access doors facing public streets experience r� f' Materials S i (Highway 100 District) Provide a diverse mix of materials, applied in a variety of proportions, exposures and detailing within a bloek O� elong a St�eet A simple uncluttered street can be attractive Encourage durable, high quality materials local sources if available Siding is not allowed (vinyl, metal, wood) except as a complimentary use Opportiinity Site 1lasterPl��n DevelopmentG��itlelines C, VI, Review arid Approvais Pror_ess Review Meetin�s Design Sign-off: After the final design review meeting, the design consultant will submit a The Ci has retained a desi n consultant to simple bullet-point overview of the proposed t1' 9 Review One: An initial introduction meeting design. help interpret this document and to will be scheduled by the applicant to meet the constructively review the developer's proposal key city staff and the city's design consultant. The planner will include this overview along with in order to insure the architecture and site lannin follow the intent of these Develo ment the information packages issued to the P 9 P This meetina will have five obiectives: commission and the council. The consultant will Guidelines. Answer questions about the Guidelines. also include any inconsistencies between the Our mission is to work with the developer(s) proposed design and the Guidelines. The very early in their schematic design process in planning commission's recommendation to the Outline the schedule. council will include their osition on the order to avoid wasting time and money pursuing p inappropriate designs. Verify the deliverables for the Approval inconsistencies. The Council will have final say Process. on all design disputes. We do not believe constructive design critiques can happen at 10:30 at night in a public General review of the developers initial meeting, in the council chambers. It is also design thoughts. The developer should present important to note that this review process will past work that most closely represents the focus on exterior design and site planning. direction they will be considering. It is assumed that the developer's experience and design Technical/engineering issues will be reviewed skills by the city staff. No building permits will be were scrutinized by the city in the selection I issued �nnthout fully complying wnth codes, process. ordinances and other quantitative regulator I requirements. It is assumed that chosen Define the communication flow between the developers have thoroughly read these developer, city and consultants. 'I Guidelines so they appreciate and embrace our design intentions. Ignorance is not an excuse. Review Two: As soon as the developer has generated sufficient drawings for a meaningful design review the developer will schedule a review with the city planner and the design consultant. As previously stated, this review will focus on the architectural design and site planning. Review Three: This is a continuation of the design review process. The city is hopeful that after this review the design direction is clear and the developer can move forward with the final presentation material for the planning commission and council meetings. Additional Reviews: Only as necessary. J�7 Opportunity Site hlasterPlan DevelopmentGuidelines Approval Process City Council Although this site constitutes a major re- Within two weeks of the commission hearing, development within the community, it is the the developer will present to the city council. mission of the city to simplify the fortnal Barring any unusual circumstances, the council approval process for each development within should approve the project. It should be noted each District. that if the council conditionally approvals the project, the ciry staff will be responsible for The Development Guidelines have been validating the satisfactory resolution of each thoroughly critiqued by the city via numerous condition, rather than requiring the applicant to meetings and workshops in order to create a return for another council hearing. However, if very clear architectural framework and a the developer's solutions to the council's streamlined process for the developer. In effect, conditions do not satisfy the staff, the applicant the traditional Concept Plan Approval has been will very likely be required to present again to completed by virtue of council approval of these the council. Approval will require a simple Development Guidelines. majority vote. It is important to note that the city is also streamlining the presentation deliverables required for the public heanngs. The city wants the developer to spend dollars on a beautiful and accurate presentation. Approval of the technical issues will be the responsibility of the city staff. The following Approval Process assumes that the chosen developer is embracing the intent of the Guidelines, cooperating with the city and is not requesting variations. The city is very hopeful that all the complicated issues will be I, resolved prior to public meetings and thus the I planning commission and council meetings should be quasi formalities. Final Plan Approval Planning Commission The developer will be required to make a formal presentation to the planning commission. This will be a public hearing. The commission will review the project and submit their recommendations to the council. 57 Opportunity Site Nlaster Plan DevelopmentGuidelines CREDITS: Opportunity Site Task Force: City Staff: IMAGE CREDITS: Tim Willson Michael McCauley Images from the Metropolitan Design Center '�:�rr,rn;s5icn Li,��,�� Image Bank, O Regents of the University of Donn Escher— Brad Hoffman Minnesota, all rights reserved, used with permission can be found on pages 2, 14, 26, �r;�mmission Cl��;.�r Juec`�, 30, 35, 38, 44, 46, 48, 49, and page 51. Judy Thorbus Curt Boganey Other images provided by Elness Swenson �;��s�on Ch� ��ageNDirector of Oper�r�� Graham Architects and Damon Farber Associates image libraries. Bud Sorenson Tom Bublitz ;pmenf Spec<<: Robert Anderson Ron Warren ���cialist Eric Bems Todd Blomstrom Muriel Lee -�s Jeanette (Jeanne) Messersmith Dave Peterson Consultants: Damon Farber Associates Elness Swenson Graham Architects Benshoof Associates Stanley Consultanfs Visual Communicafions �tizens, business owners, City Staff, State ,,rencies and local politicians who contributeu RMF Entities '�eir time and ideas to the Logan and 57th ?esign Guidefines. It is the dedication and ha; TOLD Development ��ork of such individuals that make Brooklyn enter a thriving community today and providF �sion for its future. 58 City Council Agenda Item No. 11a A�sociation of �etropo itan �unitipalities February 10, 2006 Mayor Myrna Kragness City of Brooklyn Center 3401 63rd Ave N Brooklyn Center, MN 55429-2209 Re: Constitutional Dedication of the Motor Vehicle 5ales Tax Dear Mayor Kragness: In 2005, the legislature passed a proposed constitutional amendment that would dedicate i00% ofthe existing motor vehicle sales t� (MVST) to the highway user t� distribution fund. Previous legislation has akeady dedicated this money to highway and transit funding under state statute, but as a result of budget shortfalls preceding administrations have used the money to balance the budget. Placing the motor vehicle sales tax in the highway user fund through a constitutional amendment would ensure dedication of the funds. The current proposed amendment, which is enclosed, would take at least 40 percent of the revenue generated by the existing motor vehicle sales tax and dedicate it to transit statewide, and would dedicate no more than 60 percent of the funds towards highways statewide. The conversion of money from the general fund, where it had previously been rerouted, will take place over five years being fully phased in by 2011. TherP a.re threP issues that have ana�e the Cc�nstitutinnal dedication.controversial. First, the ainendment langua.ge does not guarantee a fixed amount for roads. Second, there is concern that the public will consider the problem to be "fixed" if they vote far the amendment, when we know that the MVST amendment will only provide about 25% of the furiding necessaxy to maintain our current level of congestion. And finally, the dedication of MVST to transportation financing will create a hole in the general fund. Critics consider these issues to be fatal flaws and are campaigning against the amendment as it is written. None of these issues, either singularly or in combination is sufficient reason to oppose the amendment. While critics argue that roads will be left out, each biennium 145 UniversityAvenue West SaintPaul, Minnesota 55903-2044 Telephone: (651) 215-4000 Fax: (651) 281-1299 E-mail: amm@amm945.org proceeds from MVST must be legislatively appropriated for roads and transit. Highway funding has a very strong constituency in the legislature and road construction will get its fair share. While it's alsa true that MVST will only provide a portion af the necessary transportation funding, ($300 million in additional funds compared to a$1 billion need), it represents an important first step toward additional funding. .And finally, while dedicating MVST to transportation may leave a shortfall i.n �.he g�nP*al fiand, MVST is a tra.nsp�rtation related t� that shot�id be dedicate� to transportation uses. The AMNI has taken a position, through its transportation policy committee and board of directors, of supporting the proposed constitutional amendment as it is currently drafted. It is acknowledged by transpartation advocates and municipalities alike that the current draft of the proposed amendment could have been done differently, however drastic changes to the language at this late stage undermine the ultimate passage of the amendment. The AMM is aware of atteznpts to change the current language of the amendment and/or defeat the current amendment as it is proposed. The AMM is encouraging individual cities to pass resolutions supporting the passage of the constitutional amendment. Funding for highways and transit is increasingly more difficult to secure and a dedicated more stable source of funding must be sought. Enclosed is a sample resolution that can be used as a starting point for individual city resolutions. We are encouraging cities to pass the resolutions, return an adopted copy and the resolutions will be used in AMM's legislative campaign to show legislators that cities support the passage of the MVST amendment. If there are any questions or cor<eerns �iease feel to coi��act either Sarah Er:cksan at 6�? -215-4003 sarah(cr�,amm145.or� or Louis Jambois at 651-215-4001 louis(a�amm145.or� for more information. �Si cere y r L�'ouis Ja�b'ois Executive Direetor c.c. City Administrator/Managers Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTTON SUPPORTII�TG CONSTITtJTTONAL AMENDMENT FOR MOTQR VEHICLE SALES TAX DEDICATION TO TRANSPORTATION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Broaklyn Center is the official governing body of the City of Brooklyn Center; and WI�REAS, Minnesota's transportation infrastructure forms the backbone of the State's economy and has a direct impact on future economic development; and WHEREAS, funding for highway and transit systems in Minnesota has rernained stagnant and is failing to keep pace with its growing population and growing demands; and WHEREAS, local governments throughout the State struggle to maintain local transportation systems while the State's gas tax has not been increased since 1988 and transit budgets have been cut in recent years; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has repeatedly turned to revenue from the motor vehicle sales ta��, which ahs been viewed as user fee revenue, in order to fund highway and transit systems including the current dedication of 54% of motor vehicle sales ta�c for trans ortation oses; and P P�P WHEREAS, the Legislature passed a proposed constitutional amendment during the 2005 Legislative Sessioi� t�iat would appear on the November 7, 2006 ballot asking voters if the remaining 46% of motor vehi ��e sales t� revenue currenfly used for other purposes should be used for highways and transit systems; and WHEREAS� passage of this amendment would mean an increase in more stable revenue for highway and transit s, stems throughout the State and would raise approximately $300 million per yeaz once the transfer of rev nue i s full hased in b 2011. YP Y NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Brooklyn Center strongly supports passage of the proposed amendment to tl�e Minnesota Constitution dedicating all of the motor vehicle sales t� revenue to n with at e o o public transit assistance and not�e�3�n�GTJ°T�o of the veri�r highway purposes. Passed and adopted this 27th ay of February, 2006. 1- w w RESOLUTION NO. Februarv 27, 2006 Date Mayar ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUT'ION SUPPORTII�IG THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT F4R MOTOR VEHICLE SALES TAX DEDICATION TO TRANSPORTATION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center is the official governing body of the City of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, Minnesota's transportation infrastructure forms the backbone of the State's economy and has a direct impact on future economic development; and WHEREAS, funding for highway and transit systems in Minnesota has remained stagnant and is failing to keep pace with its growing population and growing demands; and WHEREAS, local govemments throughout the State siruggle to maintain local transportadon systems while the State's gas tax has not been increased since 1988 and transit budgets have been cut in recent years; and WI the Minnesota Legislature has repeatedly tumed to revenue from the motor vehicle sales tax, which ahs been viewed as user fee revenue, in order to fund highway and transit systems including the current dedication of 54% of motor vehicle sales tax for transportation purposes; and WHEREAS, the Legislature passed a proposed constitutional amendment during the 2005 Legislative Session that would appear on the November 7, 2006 ballot asking voters if the remaining 46% of motor vehicle sales ta�c revenue currendy used for other purposes should be used for highways and transit systems; and WHEREAS, passage of this amendment would mean an increase in mare stable revenue for highway and transit systems throughout the State and would raise approximately $300 million per year once the transfer of revenue is fully phased in by 2011. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Brooklyn Center strongly supports passage of the proposed amendment to the Minnesota Constitution dedicating all of the motor vehiele sales tax revenue to transporta.tion with at least 40% of the revenue for public transit assistance and not more then 60% of the revenue for highway purposes. Passed and adopted this 27th day of February, 2006. RESOLUTION NO. Februarv 27, 2006 Date Mayor ATTEST: Ci Clerk tY The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City Council Agenda Item No. llb Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION AND APPRECIATION FOR THE DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE OF JEANIE MUELLER WHEREAS, Jeanie Mueller has been an employee of the City of Brooklyn Center from September 23, 1971, to February 24, 2006; and WHEREAS, Jeanie Mueller worked in the capacities of Liquor Store Cashier/Clerk, Liquor Retail Supervisor, Acting Liquor Store Manager, Liquor Store Manager, Acting Liquor Operations Manager, and, ultimately, Liquor Operations Manager; and WHEREAS, Jeanie Mueller has performed each position in an exemplary fashion, assuring that the interests of the City and needs of customers were well served; and WHEREAS, Jeanie Mueller's efficient and professional management of the Liquor Stores have achieved the Council goals of effective liquor control and significant net income generating hundreds of thousands of dollars used for numerous public improvements; and WHEREAS, it is highly appropriate that her service to the community should be recognized and expressed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, upon the recommendation of the City Manager, that the dedicated public service of Jeanie Mueller is hereby recognized and appreciated by the City of Brooklyn Center Februarv 27, 2006 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City Council Agenda Item No. 11 c Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING APPRECIATION TO MR. ROBERT SHADDUCK AND JERRY'S WHEREAS, many of the residents and businesses of the City of Brooklyn Center experienced substantial damage and loss to their properties as a result of the storm on September 21, 2005; and WHEREAS, the extensive damage to and loss of trees in the City ereated a critical need for space to store and stage for removal, the massive amounts of debris created by the September 21, 2005 storm; and WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Shadduck of Jerry's provided free use of the former Jenry's New Market site at 5801 Xences Avenue North for the storage and processing of storm debris from the entire City of Brooklyn Center. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center hereby expresses its sincere gratitude for the generosity demonstrated by Robert Shadduck and Jerry's for the use of the former Jerry's New Market site for the benefit of the residents and businesses of the City of Brooklyn Center. Februarv 27, 2006 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City Council Agenda Item No. lld City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community MEMORANDUM TO: Mayar Kragness, Councilmembers C ody, Lasman, Niesen, and O'Connor FROM: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager DATE: February 23, 2006 SUBJECT: Set Date and Time of Joint Work Sess n With Financial Commission for Monday, May 15, 2006, at 6:30 p.m. I would recommend setting May 15, 2006, at 6:30 p.m. for a joint Work Session with the Financial Commission to review utilit rates. We believe th Y at we will be read for y a discussion of utility rates by May. Currently, Mr. Blomstrom is fully engaged with design and other activities for the summer construction proj ects. �6301 Shin le Creek Parkwa g .Y Recreation and Community Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434 FAX (763) 569-3494 www.cityofbrooklyncenter. org City Council Agenda Item No. 11 e Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING THE CITY OF BROOKLYN'S CENTER SUPPORT FOR A REFERENDUM FOR ANY STADIUM SALES TAX IN HENNEPIN COUNTY W�� WHEREAS, The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners approved a resolution Tuesday, May 3, directing staff to draft a legislative proposal seeking tax levy authority to fund construction of a new Twins ballpark in downtown Minneapolis, and WHEREAS, State Statute 297A.99 (Loca1 Sales Taxes) Subd. 3. provides that imposition of a local sales tax is subject to approval by voters of the political subdivision at a general election, and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has requested an exemption by the Minnesota Legislature to State Statute 297A.99 to a11ow the direct levy of a proposed rate of tax of .15 percent without a countywide vote by the taxpayers of Hennepin County to last until December 31, 2036, and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center states its opposition to levying a sales tax on the taxpayers in Hennepin County for a ballpark stadium without a countywide vota,�.�i 3� NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, that no stadium tax be assessed to taatpayers in Hennepin County without a countywide vote as provided i�State Statute 297A.99. The City Manager is directed to send a copy of this Resolution to area Legislators and Hennepin County Commissioners. Februarv 27. 2006 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member And upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. S �S°'� 2' �y� Czty of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Kragness, Councilmembers Ca ody, Lasman, Niesen, and O'Connor FROM: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager DATE: February 23, 2006 SUBJECT: Agenda Itei�� 11 e Resolution on Stadium Vote This item is carried over from the February 13, 2006, City Council agenda. CouncilmemberNiesen indicated she would gather information and provide a resolution for Council consideration. �6301 Shingle Creek Parkwa .Y Recreation and Community Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434 FAX (763) 569-3494 www. cityofbrooklyncenter.org AGENDA CITY COUNCIL�ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WORK SESSION February 27, 2006 Immediately Following Regular City Council and EDA Meetings Starting at 7:00 P.M. City Council Chambers 1. Council Member Niesen: Improving communication efforts with the community (Carried over from February 13�' Work Session) 2. Discussion of: a. Process for handling individual City Council Member requests for Work Session Agenda items and for information requiring assembly of materials and or analysis b. Identifying City Council items for analysis in connection with the development of the 2007 budget at the June 12�' Joint Work Session c. Scheduling a Work Session to determine City Council goals and projects for 2007 3. Council Member Niesen: Audio Visual Equipment for Brooklyn Center 4. Council Member O'Connor: placement of sewer pipes 5. Council Member O'Connor: converting Inn on the Farm into a museum and public P�'k 6. Council Member Niesen: Crystal Airport and media inquiries 7. Council Member Niesen: Community Outreach Meetings 8. Council Member Niesen: City Summit 9. Adj ourn Page 1 of 1 Michael McCauley From: Diane Niesen Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 7:30 PM To: Michael McCauley Subject: Improving communication efforts with the Community To: Michael McCauley, city manager For: Upcoming Work Session On City website, I believe we should provide these elements: A list of City Ordinances that are either under Council consideration, and/or expected to be on an upeoming Agenda soon. Agenda for next regular meeting in text form at the root of the Council site (no drilling down for people, use of commonly understood terminology that is complete as to the action proposed) I'm concerned that people are not hearing about proposed law changes, and that subsequently the Council is at a decision-making disadvantage vs. having appropriate community-informed input. With Ordinance changes, especially those that will impact an entire community (e.g., proposed parking law change for R1 areas), there should be No Surprises, or, if some people say they were uninformed, that it can be shown that a good faith effort was made to get the word out to our residents (vs. just legal compliance). With the maturing of mass communication technology, there should be scant reason why important Council actions under consideration can't garner increasingly more attention in the community. At the NLC I picked up some good ideas from communities working to expand community conversation (two-way dialogue) and feel strongly that Brooklyn Center should build on its efforts to get people involved in our Opportunity Site planning, and find more/better ways to reach our population with government messages that may affect their daily lives. Fr: Diane Niesen, councilmember P.S. My previous email was also intended for a Work Session 2/21 /2006 City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community To: Mayor Kragness and Council Members Carmody, Lasman, Niesen, and O'Connor From: Michael J. McCauley City Manager Date: February 23, 2006 Re: Individual City Council Member Requests Generally speaking, individual City Council Member requests fall into these broad categories: Citizen complaint or Council Member inquiry regarding a specific code enforcement issue Request for information that is: o A copy of previously provided information o Readily available infarmation o Not readily available Requires assembly and/or analysis Work Session Agenda Item that is o Self-explanatory o Requires staff time, including any or all of the following Assembly of materials Analysis Recommendations Displacement of other work or priorities. As staff has tried to respond ta various individual City Council Member requests, the amount of time involved in responding has ebbed and flowed. Issues arise in the absence of an articulated City Council direction as to scope, timing, and impact on City Council goals and existing projects. If the City Council wishes to pursue a matter proposed by an individual City Council member that will impact staff time and other priorities, it would be helpful to have a more formal process to better respond to City Council direction. I am suggesting that the City Council consider creating a process for handling individual City Council requests that would give more formal direction in a number of ways. The first would be to have the City Council determine the threshold question of whether the Council wishes to look into or pursue a matter. Secorid, the City Council would determine the scope, timing, and prioritization of reviewing a matter. For example, some items Iend themselves to a discussion in connection with setting goals for the coming year, as opposed to an ad noc addition during a year. Other items may be suitable for development of informatian and analysis during a year, but iieed to be scheduled to avoid �6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation ¢nd Community Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434 FAX (763) 569-3494 www. cityofbrooklyncenter.org Y I i conflicts with established priorities and projects. An example would be developing information or analysis for consideration in setting a future year's priorities or budget. Such mformation would be needed before the pnorities or budget are determmed. But if the development of informatian or analysis impacted Engineering/Public Works, it would I best be accomplished be timing the analysis to avoid impacting design work and timing for street and other construction projects. I Attached are flow charts that would outline a proposed method for handling individual City Council Member requests for Work Session Agendas and for information requiring assembly and/or analysis to facilitate having the City Council: I 1. Determine if a. The City Council wishes to discuss or pursue a matter b. The City Council wants a report or materials prepared 2. And if so, provide direction by: a. Determining the scope of the matter b. Prioritization of the matter c. Timing of i. Staff reports ii. Its future consideration at a subsequent Work Session I would also propose that the City Council set a time to discuss goals/projects for 2007. I would suggest scheduling a Work Session on September 18�' for that purpose, unless the City Council has a facilitated retreat for that purpose in August or September. Also, if there are items that the City Council would like to consider for 2007 that have budgetary/staffing implications that the City Council identify those items as a group at the June 12�' Joint Work Session with the Financial Commission. This will allow us to prepare reports on fiscal im�acts and options in connection with the budget work sessions on August 21 St October 16 or November 2p In a recent newspaper article, the City of Coon Rapids City Council determined that it did not wish to explore changing the City's name. That resolution came about because the council determined that the majority was not interested in even discussing the concept. The matter ended without using further city council time or before any staff resources were expended. I I Page 2 02/23/2006 r '`i Individual Council Member Request to Place Item on Work Session Agenda Place on Work Place on Agenda Session Agenda Seif-Explanatory Request or Materials for Verbal with Materials I Yes Supplied by Council Member I No Explanation by Minimal Staff Assembly of Materials Councii Member I Council I No Interested in i Yes Pursuing I Identify/Prioritize Scope and Timing and Need for Analysis Comment I Prepare Report/ Materials Work Session Agenda for Council Direction Council Goes Yes I orward with Ite No Implement Requires I Place on Direction No Formal Action Yes Regutar Agenda Individual City Council Member Request for Information Copy of Existing Compilation of Document(s) Information or Analysis i Previously Given Readily No to Council Available Work Session No Yes Agenda for Council Yes Direction I Copy to Copy to All Council Requesting Generally Council Member Copy to Council Council Not Council Requests: Interested Identify Scope, Timing, and Priority Compilation and Analysis Report to Council Page 1 of 2 Michael McCauley From: Michael McCauley Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:33 AM To: Diane Niesen Cc: 'tgaffron@nwct.org'; 'gmoore@nwct.org' Subject: RE: Request for information: Audio and Video Equipment for BC There will be a regular agenda item on replacing the cable character generator when the specifications have been drafted. I will place a work session item regarding the remainder of your e-mail for Council direction on whether the Council wishes to have a study undertaken of those items. From: Diane Niesen Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 8:33 PM To: Michael McCauley Cc: tgaffron@nwct.org; gmoore@nwct.org Subject: Request for information: Audio and Video Equipment for BC To: Michael McCauley, city manager Fr: Diane Niesen, councilmember For: Upcoming Council Regular Session Agenda c: Greg Moore and Tim Gaffron of NWCT It was noted and reported to Tim Gaffron 2-15 that replay of Brooklyn Center's (BC) Council Meeting of 2-13-06 was un-watchable due to constant interruption of signal. Tim is investigating and may contact City Hall, and will provide a videotape to me that hopefully is a clean copy of the meeting. It should be noted that this is the second major issue with the broadcasting of BC's Council meetings in about the span of a month. Agenda item: Council vote on: replacing obsolete bill boarding equipment (for the scrolling) with current replacement technology, dedication of funds received to purposes for which this tax is being collected: communication. Following the discussion about cab{e communication equipment at our last meeting, please provide the following so it is available to councilmembers for the discussion of the above item. NOTE: If any of the following items are the responsibility of NWCT staff and not BC city staff, I would ask either Tim or Greg to have those items provided. 1. BC's Inventory of Audio and Video Equipment that is used in conjunction with recording, videotaping and cable-casting of city business, council meetings and other meetings taped for public purposes. The inventory list should include the year of manufacture as the date of installation could be significantly different. 2. The Fund Budget schedule that covers maintenance of the items on this Inventory list and who prepares. 3. The Review Plan Schedule and person(s) responsible for replacemenUupdating of the items on this Inventory list and the person(s) responsible for creating, deciding and maintaining this Schedule. Please include their most recent memo/report which should be the supporting documentation for item 2 above. 4. The amount of money BC received from NWCT for 2006 (amount expected if not received to-date), 2005, and 2004. Please provide any supporting documentation that accompanied the remittance to the City of these taxpayer funds. 2/21 /2006 Page 2 of 2 5. The disposition (category, amounts) of the funds received from 2005 and 2004 IF spent. 6. How information on Equipment from the Inventory List flows (what action on whose part) between NWCT, city staff, City Liaisons to NWCT and BC Council (e.g. the expected/historical points of contact and the timeframe, actions or information that triggers them). 2/21/2006 Ir Page 1 of 1 Michael McCauley From: Diane Niesen Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 9:40 AM To: Tim Gaffron Cc: Michael McCauley; Greg Moore Subject: RE: Cable Signal Thank you for your diligence, Tim. With my request to our City Manager about Equipment, etc., my goal is to ensure that we are covering our side of the responsibilities for ensuring quality cable eommunications to the citizenry. There's always more to learn and I'm glad for the opportunity to learn more about our cable casting. From: Tim Gaffron [mailto:TGafFron@twelve.tv] Sent: Thu OZ/16/06 12:48 PM To: Diane Niesen Cc: Michae{ McCauley; Greg Moore Subject: Cable Signal Councilmember Niesen, I spent about an hour at Brooklyn Center City Hall this morning trying to observe the on-air signal problem that you described to me. It did not occur while I was watching the channel. However, I did discover that your live/billboarding signal is presently not going out over the air, so something is definitely wrong with the cable signals. Since it was working on Monday night, something in the cable system has failed since then. Whatever it is that has failed may have been intermittently failing at the time you were trying to watch the meeting and may have caused the signal disturbances that you experienced. Hopefully, now that it has failed completely, it will be easier for Comcast technicians to track down. I contacted them at about 10:OOam this morning and they are looking into the problem(s). I will let you know when I have more information to report regarding this problem. Tim Gaffron Production Manager/Government Liaison Northwest Community Television/Channel 12 6900 Winnetka Ave. N. Brooklyn Park, MN 55428� Ph: 763-533-8196 F�: 763-533-1346 Ce1L• 612-819-1450 tgaffron@nwct.org OR tgaffron@twelve.tv Web Sites: www.nwct.org www.twelve.tv 2/21 /2006 7 City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community To: Mayor Kragness and Council Members Carmody, Lasman, Niesen, and O'Connor From: Michael J. McCauley City Manager Date: February 23, 2006 Re: Cable The short answer to the operation and maintenance of the audio visual equipment is that I we rely on Tim Gaffron to advise regarding equipment and to operate the systems. We spent around $69,000 on equipment when the Council Chambers were remodeled. Funding for those costs were from the Cable grant. In 2004, $21,703 was received and split between the General Fund and the Capital Projects Fund. In 2005, $24,031.19 was received and all funds placed in the Capital Projects Fund. We do not budget for the maintenance of the audio visual equipment. As an aside, Jim Glasoe has been tasked with creating an inventory of major building components to develop a replacement schedule for roofs etc. That project also includes developing an overview of equipment (not related to Information Technology). Tim Gaffron will be asked to provide a schedule of anticipated needs for the Council Chambers audio visual equipment. We have been exploring since last year the feasibility of digital cameras and a system that would put Council meetings on the web site with a an index of agenda items that would allow a person to click on an agenda item and go directly to that portion of the meeting with video and audio. Attached are copies of the Ietters from Northwest Community Television regarding the last quarter payment from 2005 and the grant to cover costs of Northwest Community Television staff broadcasting City Council meetings. 6301 Shin le Cr ek r g e Pa kwdy Recreataon and Communaty Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (�63) 569-3434 FAX (763) 569-3494 www.cityofbraohlyncenter. org NortFiwest Su6ur6s Ca6Ce Communications Commission 6900 Winiietka Avenue Norti� Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 (763) 536-8355 October 28, 20055 MICHAEL MCCAULEY CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 Enclosed you will find a check for the quarterly payment of the 2005 Cable Capital Grant in the amo�uit of $5,60525 The Northwest Suburbs Cable Connnunications Commission l�as increased its capital flat grant to cities by 4%. The grant, to be paid quarterly, is comprised of a flat grant to each city plus a� proportional grant determined by the number of subscribers within each city. The schedule for these payments will be January 30 April 30`�', July 30� and October 30th. If tl�e 30` lands on a weekend the payment will be sent prior to the 30`�'. Your payment breaks down as follows: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 2005 FLAT GRANT $14,979.00 2005 PROPORTIONAL GRANT 7,442.00 ANNUAL TOTAL: $22,42L00 TOTALDIVIDED BY 4= 5,605.25 PER QTIZ. Cities are to spend the money on cable television related purposes ]lowever, you do not have to jtistify your expenses to the Cable Commission. We would suggest l�owever, tl�at y: �i con�ult v�:tl; the staff cf Nortllwest Cem�llunity Tele��isicn bef:�re you actualiy� �urchast equipment. Plcase note that the actual dollar amounts of ti�ese grants may change each year depending on tlie number of cable subscribers. If you have any questions, please call me at 763-533-8196. Sincerely, ��i� Gre� ore, Executive Director Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission Jim Glasoe ooklyn Center �[3rooklyn Park Crystal Golden Vallcy Maplc Grove New t lope Osseo Plymouth Robbinsdale Y Northwest Community Television 6900 WinnetKa Avenue Nortti, BrooKlyn Park MN 55425-1 688 PHONE 763.533.8196 FAX 763.533.1346 January 20, 2006 WEB www.nwct.org To: Cable Grant Administrator Attached is the year-end accounting for your Production Grant fund available through the NWCT budget. If your charges have exceeded the amount available in your account, an invoice for the difference is enclosed. If you have not used all of the money available, a check for the remaining balance in your grant account is enclosed. The grant amount available for 2006 for each city:�s' $3,125. This is an increase of 4% over last year approved by the Board of Directors and Cable Commission. The City Capital Replacement fund will continue in 2006. More information will be coming to you about this in the next two to three weeks. The NWSCCC and NWCT Board of Directors also approved a 3.5% wage adjustment that will go into effect as of January 1, 2006 for all City Meeting crews. Please feel free to call me or Greg Moore if you have any questions. Best wishes for 2006. :n' SERVING Brooklyn Center Tim Gaffron Brookiyn Park Production Manager/Government Liaison Crystal Golden Valley le Grove Hope Osseo Plymouth Robbinsdale 7 City of �rooklyn Center A Millennium Community To: Mayar Kragness and Council Members Carmody, Lasman, Niesen, and O'Connor From: Michael J. McCauley�; City Manager Date: February 21, 2006 Re: Work Session Item from Council Member O'Connor regarding �Storm Sewer reconstruction Council Member O'Connor requested a Work Session item to discuss alternatives to the reconstruction of the trunk storm sewer line that goes under Interstate 94. Her voice mail message suggested routing the sewer along I-94 and referenced certain structures. The structure referenced along Lyndale is a sanitary sewer lift station. The storm and sanitary systems are separate systems. Enclosed are the agenda materials from the October lO City Council meeting where consulting services were authorized for the storm water system and the design on the 59 Avenue Trunk Storm Sewer in particular. It would not be possible to run lines parallel to I-94 to avoid going under I-94 without a re-design of major portions of the system. 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, 1VIN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434 FAX (763) 569-3494 www. cityo fbrooklyncenter. org t City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community To: Mayor Kragness and Council Members Carmody, Lasman, Niesen, and O'Connor From: Michael J. McCaule City Manager Date: October 6, 2005 Re: Starm Water Ma gement Planning Services I asked Mr. Blomstrom to make arrangements to develop a comprehensive plan for dealing with the storm sewer system, especially future maintenance issues related to storm water management ponds. Under federal/state law, the City has responsibilities for ponds, both private and public. We need to develop a plan for dealing with these ponds in connection with the budgeting process for the Storm Water Utility. Mr. Blomstrom solicited proposals for performing this work, along with the other updating services described in his memorandum. This is essential work to develop an update to the Local Water Management Plan, plans for the 59� Avenue Trunk Storm �ewer Improvements, and a plan to deal with maintenance of the ponds and infrastructure. The lack of a comprehensive plan/vision for handling the maintenance of these ponds is an area that I have wanted addressed for some time. Without a comprehensive plan, we are faced with the situation of being unable to adequately plan for that maintenance and its funding. 6301 Shingle Creek Parkw¢y Recreation and Community Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434 FAX (763) 569•3494 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org City of .Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community ANDUM MEMOR DATE: October 5, 2005 TO: Michael McCauley, City Manager FROM: Todd Blomstrom, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Resolution Awarding a Professional Services Contract for Storm Water Management Planning Services The 2005 Budget for the Storm Sewer Utility includes funding for consulting services to conduct storm water management planning services. The purpose of this planning effort is to update the City's local Storm Water Management Plan and determine future capital and maintenance costs for the drainage system. A general summary of the requested services is provided below. Part 1— Update Local Water Management Plan The Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions (SC/WMWMC) recently completed a revised Second Generation Watershed Management Plan. Member cities are now required to update their Local Water Management Plar�s to be in compliance with the SC/WNIWMC Second Generation Plan. City staff recommends that the scope of this work be limited to completing the necessary modifications to the Local Water Management Plan as required by State Statutes and the SC/WMWMC. Extensive technical analysis of the City's drainage system is not recommended as part of the required update. Part 2— Storm Water Infrastructure Maintenance Planning The City of Brooklyn Center currently has approxunately 75 public and private storm water management ponds located within the City and Mn/DOT drainage systems. Consulting services are needed to formulate a long term management strategy and capital improvement plan for maintenance of existing storm water ponds serving City property and right-of-way for local roadways. This capital improvement planning effort would provide data to assist in establishing future stonn water utility rates to fund ma}or rehabilitation and maintenance work for public storm water ponds. 6301 Shingle Creeh Parkway Recreation ¢nd Community Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434 FAX (763) 569-3494 www.cit��ofbroolzlyncenter.org r �Ir Part 3— 59 Avenue Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements A fully developed residential area (approx. 300 acres) within the southeastern portion of Brooklyn Center currently drains through a 30-inch diameter storm sewer crossing under Interstate 94 near S9�' Avenue. This trunk storm sewer does not provide adequate conveyance capacity for the upstream drainage area. Local flooding has occurred along portions of the trunk main. Consulting services are needed to assist with preparing a feasibility study to replace/construct approxunately 2,000 feet of this trunk storm. sewer, including the portion crossing under Interstate 94. The construction cost estimate from the feasibility report would be used to update the City's Capital Improvement Program budget. City staff solicited proposals from qualified engineering firrns to provide assistance with local storm water management planning tasks as described above. The following three engineering firms provided proposals for the work: TKDA Engineers, Bonestroo Associates, and Short Elliot Hendrickson. The proposals were evaluated by engineering division staff and ranked on the basis of price, qualifications and proposed scope of work. Engineering staff recommends that the work be awarded to Bonestroo Associates based on an evaluation of the information provided in the proposals. Bonestroo Associates prepared the first generation Local Storm Water Management Plan for the City of Brooklyn Center in 1997. Their proposal included a highly detailed scope of services and a diverse project team having experience with completing similar projects. The proposal from Bonestroo Associates also included preliminary design assistance from a company that specializes in the construction of large diameter pipelines under interstate highways in order to address engineering challenges associated with Part 3 of the project. The total professional services fee for the project is $75,541. The project is expected to be completed by August 2006. The 2005 budget includes $58,000 for the portion of work expected to be completed in 2005. The remaining cost for consulting fees would need to be fiznded from the 2006 budget for the Storm Sewer Utility. Attached for City Council consideration is a resolution awarding a contract with Bonestroo Associates for professional engineering services in the amount of $75,541. .r Member Kathleen Carmody introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2�45-150 RESOLUTION AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLANNING SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is required to update the L,ocal Storm Water Management �'lan to be in compliance with the Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management f;ommissions second generation water management plan; and WHEREAS, additional storm water management planning is necessary to establish long-term mai�tenance and capital improvement costs for the public storm water drainage system within the Cit� of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, proposals for professional services were solicited from three qualified engineering fi� ms to provide storm water management planning services for the City of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik Associates was selected as the best candidate for :he project based on an evaluation of price, qualifications and proposed scope of services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Cent er, Minnesota that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute a contract for pr �fessional services with Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik Associates in the amount of $75,541 to pro ✓ide storm water management planning services in accordance with the specifications and proposal d xuments therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer. Octaber 10. 2005 ate Q Mayor A.TTEST: i �ity Clerk i The motion fo�f the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kay Iasman and upon vote eing taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof Myrna Kragness, Kathleen ody, Kay iasman, and I7iane Niesen; and the follow g voted against the same: �y 0' Connor whereupon sai resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. I 1 t City of Brooklyn Cente� A Millennium Community To: Mayor Kragness and Council Members Carmody, Lasman, Niesen, and C�'Connor From: Michael J. McCauley� City Manager Date: February 22, 2006 Re: Work Session Item from Council Member O'Connor regarding converting the Inn on the Farm into a museum and public park Council Member O'Connor requested a Work Session item to discuss converting the Inn on the Farm into a museum and public park up to an including the water tower area. �6301 Shin Ze Creek Parkwa Recre¢tion and Communit Center Phone TDD Number g y y Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434 FA�Y (763) 569-3494 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org ,w Page 1 of 1 Michael McCauley From: Diane Niesen Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 7:44 PM To: Michael McCauley Subject: Crystal Airport To: Michael McCauley, city manager For: Communication, general and Work Session Agenda item request for last meeting in February I saw an article about Crystal Airport (CA) in the Post after the results of the Met Council's contracted survey were published, and comments taken at a meeting. There were quotes attributed to several Crystal city employees about the future of CA. You were contacted and also provided a quote. I was glad to read your comment about "waiting" to see Crystal's lead but I was wondering about the source of your comment. In my opinion, it is fine for the media to get/receive quotes on public interest issues from city employees, and eVected or appointed officials. However, I'm not sure the public would make a distinction between an opinian from a city employee and an elected official. The public might read opinions from Crystal city employees and believe they reflect the opinions and conversation of city employees and elected officials. Certainly in Brooklyn Center's case we have not discussed and voted on a CA opinion. Could you please provide some background into your approach when contacted by the media for comment on issues that the Council has not discussed and voted on? Are there other reeent examples (last 3 months) of subjects you have been asked to comment on from any media that the Council has not had an opportunity to discuss with you/the public? I believe our policy and process for providing either opinions or conjecture on items of interest to the media that have not been discussed, debated, or decided by the public's representatives would be a worthwhile discussion and I would like to discuss this late February. Thank you. From: Diane Niesen, councilmember 2/21 /2006 City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community To: Mayor Kragness and Council Members Carmody, Lasman, Niesen, and O'Connor From: Michael3. McCauley City Manager Date: February 21, 2006 Re: Work Session Item from Council Member Niesen regarding Cammunity Outreach Meetings At the January 23 d Work Session Council Member Niesen requested a Work Session item on Community Outreach Meetings 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434 F'AX (763) 569-3494 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org 1K a. City o f Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community To: Mayor Kragness and Council Members Carmody, Lasman, Niesen, and O'Connor From: Michael J. McCauley City Manager Date: February 21, 2006 Re: Work Session Item from Council Member Niesen regarding City Summit At the January 23 d Work Session Council Member Niesen requested a Work Session item on a City Summit. 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX (763) 569-3434 FAX (763) 569-3494 www.cityo fbroohlyncenter.org