Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006 04-06 FCA• Memorandum 3 Date: 3 April 2006 To: Financial Commission Subcommittee on City Council Compensation From: Daniel Jordet Director of Fiscal & Support Services Re: Compensation Discussion for 2007 & 2008 Attached to this cover memorandum are materials that may be used to consider the Subcommittee's recommendation to the full Commission on City Council compensation for the 2007 and 2008 calendar years. These materials include: • The section of the financial policies dealing with City Council compensation • The 2004 memorandum from the subcommittee to the Commission • The 2004 comparison data • The most recent comparative data (2005 and 2006) • Graphic representations of the 2006 data Again, the Subcommittee is scheduled to meet in the Shingle Creek Room (conference room next to the City Council Chambers) on Thursday, 6 April 2006 at 6:30 PM. Please contact me if you are unable to attend. 0 City of Brooklyn Center • 2.2 Policy and Procedure on Mayor and Council Member Total Compensation 1. Need for Policy The community is entitled to a clearly articulated, written description of the policy and procedure for establishing the total compensation of local elected officials. 2. Policy A. Service on the City Council is a civic obligation and an honor. The total compensation of the Mayor and Council Members should, therefore, not encourage candidacies based on monetary rather than public service objectives. However, the compensation of Brooklyn Center elected officials shall be fair and equitable in order to attract qualified candidates for local elective office. B. The propriety of the compensation levels of the Mayor and Council Members shall be evaluated through comparisons with compensation paid to similar officials within the seven county metropolitan area. C. The compensation levels of elected officials should be regularly reviewed and adjusted to ensure compliance with the objectives of this policy and to avoid the need for drastic or sudden compensation adjustments. SD. Compensation set pursuant to this policy and procedure shall be deemed to be the total compensation for elected officials of the City with the exception of expense reimbursement which shall be the same as provided all other City employees. 3. Procedure A. The City Manager shall biennially prepare a compensation report that contains an analysis of the compensation paid to elected officials of Minneapolis-St. Paul Area Metropolitan cities having a population within 10,000 of the City of Brooklyn Center that are generally fully developed {Such grouping shall include the cities of Richfield, Roseville, Maplewood, Fridley, Shoreview, White Bear Lake, Crystal, New Hope, and Golden Valley, in addition to the City of Brooklyn Center.} The report shall compute the average and median amounts paid to Mayors and Council Members and correlate survey results to the current compensation of Brooklyn Center elected City officials. The City Manager shall assemble such additional information on compensation of City elected officials as may be requested to assist the Commission and Council in their review of elected official's compensation. B. The City Manager shall submit the compensation report to the City Council and the Financial Commission prior to June 1, for information pertaining to the applicable calendar year. • C. The Financial Commission shall biennially review the City Manager's er's compensation report and discuss possible budgetary and public perception Financial Policies Secti5n II Page 21 City of Brooklyn Center • impacts of the indicated changes. Prior to July 1 of the same year, the Commission shall recommend to the City Council that the compensation of the Mayor and Council Members either remain the same or be changed to some specific amount in the manner prescribed by law. D. Consistent with the City Charter, Section 2.07, the Mayor and Council Members may, after conducting public hearings, set their compensation by ordinance. No change in compensation shall be in effect until January 1, following the next succeeding general election. 4. Authority The authority for establishing compensation for the Mayor and Council Members is found in Minnesota Statutes 415.11 and the City of Brooklyn Center Charter, Section 2.07. Reference: • City Council Minutes 1/10/94 • City Council Resolution No. 98-91 • Financial Policies SecEion 11 Page 22 Memorandum Date: 9 April 2004 Ar To: Donn Escher, Chair Members of the Financial Commission From: Jay Hruska, Subcommittee Chair Re: City Council Compensation for 2005 and 2006 The Financial Commission Subcommittee on City Council Compensation met on Thursday evening, 8 April 2004, at 6:30 PM at City Hall. Present were, Jay Hruska, Subcommittee Chair and Mark Nemec, Subcommittee Member. Also present was Daniel Jordet, Director of Fiscal &Support Services. The members reviewed the materials prepared by Mr. Jordet on behalf of the Subcommittee. Mr. Hruska asked about the inclusion of computer expenses in Council compensation. Mr. Jordet replied that the computer allowance was rolled into the overall Council compensation amount in 2000. • Mr. Hruska reviewed the goals used by compensation subcommittees in the past. It has been the goal of the group to keep City Council compensation at or above the median of the comparison cities. For 2004, the chart shows Brooklyn Center at 110% to 111% of the median for comparison cities. Both Mr. Hruska and Mr. Nemec pointed out that compensation consideration should also be viewed in light of the budget constraints currently being experienced by the City. The Subcommittee recommends that City Council compensation be left at the 2004 levels for 2005 and that no additional amounts be paid. For 2006 the Subcommittee recommends an increase of 2% in the base wage of City Council members. Total cost of the increase should be about $ 1,000 for 2006. The three main reasons for this recommendation are: • Budget constraints • Sensitivity to citizens concerns expressed about prioritization of expenses • Council's current status in terms of position above the median compensation of comparison cities This recommendation will be forwarded to the Financial Commission for consideration at their 29 April 2004 meeting. 0 • 2004 Annual Salary for Elected Officials 2004 2005 Population Mayor Council Mayor Council Golden Valley 20,391 $11,619 $8,696 $11,619 $8,696 Maplewood 35,080 $10,983 $9,666 Fridley 27,469 $9,637 $7,916 Richfield 34,876 $8,779 $6,815 New Hope 20,910 $10,672 $7,553 Roseville 33,949 $9,300 $7,020 Crystal 22,748 $9,136 $7,028 $9,410 $7,239 White Bear Lake 24,606 $7,680 $5,760 $7,680 $5,760 Brooklyn Center 29,180 $10,522 $8,056 Shoreview 36,374 $8,208 $6,084 Fridley Council salary listed above is for Council At-Large Council by ward is $6,998 Provides laptop computers Golden Valley Pays per diem of$50 per extra meeting to a maximum of$150 per month New Hope Pays per diem of$25 for EDA meetings DSL line at residence for laptop computers Provides laptop computers • 8 • 2006 Cities in Compensation Policy Comparison for City Council Salaries 2005 2006 Population* Mayor Council Mayor Council Golden Valley 20,736 $11,619 $8,696 $11,619 $8,696 Maplewood 35,763 $10,983 $9,666 $11,752 $10,343 Fridley 27,480 $9,893 $8,074 $9,926 $8,153 Richfield 34,502 $9,042 $7,019 $9,313 $7,230 New Hope 20,908 $10,672 $7,553 $10,672 $7,553 Roseville 34,080 $9,300 $7,020 $9,300 $7,020 Crystal 23,012 $9,410 $7,239 $9,410 $7,239 White Bear Lake 24,909 $7,680 $5,400 $7,680 $5,400 Brooklyn Center 29,174 $10,522 $8,056 $10,732 $8,217 Shoreview 26,475 $8,376 $6,204 $8,376 $6,204 Average $9,750 $7,493 $9,878 $7,606 Median $9,652 $7,396 $9,668 $7,396 Brooklyn Center as per cent of: Average 107.92% 107.52% 108.65% 108.04% Median 109.02% 108.92% 111.01% 111.10% Fridley Council salary listed above is for Council At-Large Council by ward is $7,208 for 2006 • Provides laptop computers Provides basic cable services Golden Valley Pays per diem of$50 per extra meeting to a maximum of$150 per month Maplewood Provides laptop computers New Hope Pays per diem of$25 for EDA meetings DSL line at residence for laptop computers Provides laptop computers Population* As listed in the 2005 LMC Directory of Minnesota City Officials • I V0 (-0 MON j I 1 c I 0O) '6 CO O C L 1 ga a o C N £`� O N CO MI a) 0 a C a) 0 Cl TO = N Z a - EI • V "in (TiN v U C U CO I N C M 4_ 0 I _U N ii O N O VOi O O N Cp O I I f0 O m Y J I I 1 • C) C) a C) O O O C) ' N O co- o N C- 10 ID • o a) a ca 2 rn I I I c a -CD cV- I I _ N I > M .gat., ,rg ...,A I W a) N i ! I 0 c0 = O 3 i a) z C p , >. ++ N N co Crn Q E • V N L. I:. I. 0 2 CD -a O _M 4) C•I co .V CC N O = o O l I, 3 M CO O L 0) m a[ (3 R LL --I I r r r r r • 0 O 0 CDO o N 0 O 0 CO CO 0 V N 11 2006 Cities in Compensation Policy Comparison for City Council Salaries CAic- C.06"'cm" 1111/ jobt, O c+.F 2005 2006 C_ hob 4'6F Population* Mayor Council Mayor Council .41ctck .(01 Golden Valley IAiwco 20,736 $11,619 $8,696 $11,619 $8,696 Maplewood ZrBisevi 35,763 $10,983 $9,666 $11,752 $10,343 i c'0 .zecct, •itei1/40 Fridley 130yn 27,480 $9,893 $8,074 $9,926 $8,153 oiu 2Bt••1. .1g11)( Richfield itinqq 3 34,502 $9,042 $7,019 $9,313 $7,230 3 cria. . ?pco.. •47..SV New Hope 64,41/4, 20,908 $10,672 $7,553 $10,672 $7,553 - • 3cd' •5* ie Roseville £'tia-1 34,080 $9,300 $7,020 $9,300 $7,020 • -2.4•vo •4-44.b Crystal q%`to5 23,012 $9,410 $7,239 $9,410 $7,239 _ • 3%144, • ° White Bear Lake 1.0 S' 24,909 $7,680 $5,400 $7,680 $5,400 -- •Wei'8 •-kowr Brooklyn Center ister.ks,. 29,174 $10,522 $8,056 $10,732 $8,217 Z'ie . Z,1sty .V1iti1• Shoreview (silo 26,475 $8,376 $6,204 $8,376 $6,204 -- • /Aril •iR 3 Average $9,750 $7,493 $9,878 $7,606 .ZEs2'j • Colkty Median $9,652 $7,396 $9,668 $7,396 •2.604 .(.Z6 Z Brooklyn Center as per cent of: Average 107.92% 107.52% 108.65% 108.04% 4104% gZ.•154 o Median 109.02% 108.92% 111.01% 111.10% cie. elo 444'0. Fridley Council salary listed above is for Council At-Large Council by ward is $7,208 for 2006 • Provides laptop computers Provides basic cable services Golden Valley Pays per diem of$50 per extra meeting to a maximum of$150 per month Maplewood Provides laptop computers New Hope Pays per diem of$25 for EDA meetings DSL line at residence for laptop computers Provides laptop computers Population* As listed in the 2005 LMC Directory of Minnesota City Officials • • I Financial Commission Work Session Meeting Minutes 26 January 2006 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Mr. Escher at 6:35 PM 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Escher, Nemec, Paulson, Asn ho Smith. Council Member Lasman was excused. Staff present werender Cityo ManagerandSgren- McCauley and Director of Fiscal & Support Services Jordet. 3. Adoption of the Agenda Mr. Paulson proposed and Mr. Anderson seconded a motion to adopt the agenda as presented. With all voting in favor, the motion was adopted. • 4. Minutes Mr. Paulson proposed and Mr. Anderson seconded a motion to adopt the minutes of the 28 July 2005 meeting as presented. With all voting in favor, the motion was adopted. Mr. Paulson proposed and Mr. Anderson seconded a motion to adopt the minutes of the City Council as minutes for the Financial Commission regarding the proceedings of the 15 August 2005 and 21 November 2005 joint work sessions on the 2006 Budget. With all voting in favor, the motion was adopted. (said City Council minutes are included with the permanent records of the Financial Commission in the Finance Department) 5. Selection of Chair for 2006 Mr. Anderson nominated Mr. Escher as Chair of the Commission for 2006. Ms. Shogren-Smith seconded the nomination. Mr. Nemec then proposed and Mr. Anderson seconded a motion to close the nominations and cast a unanimous ballot for the nominee. With all voting in favor the motion was adopted, making Mr. Escher Chair of the Commission. Mr. Escher then named Mr. Nemec as Vice Chair of the Commission. III • 6. City Council Compensation 2006 is a year in which the Financial Commission is charged with reviewing City Council compensation. Mr. Escher related some of the recent history of the process and the basic assumptions of placing the Brooklyn Center Council at or near the median compensation for the selected comparison cities. Mr. McCauley will arrange to have the comparative information updated and passed on to the Commission. Mr. Escher appointed a subcommittee to be chaired by Mr. Anderson with Mr. Paulson and Ms. Shogren-Smith to review the comparative information and present the Commission with options. 7. Update on Commissioner Appointments Mr. Jordet informed the Commissioners that with the departure of Mr. Simons and Mr. Tweah there are two openings on the Commission. Applications will be taken by the City Clerk through 31 January 2006 for the pending appointments. 8. Update on Development Activities Mr. McCauley reviewed some history and recent developments concerning the Opportunity Site, the Northbrook Shopping Center and Brookdale Center. • 9. Utility Rate Study A study of the factors affecting utility rates for water and sanitary sewer was initiated in 2005. Preliminary results indicate that further discussion is needed in order to develop a sound basis for application of new rates. The City Council and Financial Commission will hold a joint work session on 6 March 2006 to discuss the results of this study and its potential impact on Brooklyn Center's utility rates. 10. RFP for Investment Securities Custodian An RFP for Investment Securities Custodian, currently held by Wells Fargo, is being developed for a spring 2006 distribution. It will be reviewed by the Commission at its next regular meeting. 11. Calendar of Joint Meeting A revised calendar of joint meetings of the City Council and Financial Commission was distributed. The dates ofr joint working sessions with the two groups include 6 March 2006, 5 June 2006, 21 August 2006, 16 October 2006 and 20 November 2006. 12. Adjournment • With no other business to transact, the meeting was adjourned at 7:52 PM. 2 • 0,4)4 Li, 4rt Financial Commission Subcommittee on City Council Compensation Meeting Minutes 6 April 2006 Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Mr. Anderson at 6:36 PM Roll Call Subcommittee Members Present: Commissioners Anderson (Chair), Paulson and Shogren-Smith. Staff present: Director of Fiscal & Support Services Jordet. Discussion Mr. Anderson paid tribute to Donn Escher, longtime Chairman of the Financial Commission, who passed away in March. The difference between ward council members and at-large council members was • clarified, as in the case of Fridley. Materials prepared for the meeting were reviewed. The Financial Policy sets the comparison cities at those metropolitan within 10,000 population of Brooklyn Center and which are generally fully developed. The previous report to the Financial Commission in 2004 indicated that past Subcommittees have used the benchmark of the median of the comparison cities as a goal for compensation of the Brooklyn Center City Council. Compensation relationships between the last study and the current study were examined. The current compensation for the City Council relative to the other comparison cities is much the same as it was during the last study; about 110% above the average for the comparison cities. Given that the current compensation is about 10°A) higher than the stated goal for compensation of the City Council the subcommittee, by consensus, recommended no increase for City Council compensation in 2007. For 2008, the subcommittee recommended, again by consensus, a 2°A) increase in wages for both the Mayor and each City Council member. The meeting was adjourned at 6:58 PM • 3