HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006 04-24 EDAP EDA MEETING
City of Brooklyn Center
Apri124, 2006 AGENDA
1. Call to Order
—The EDA requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A
copy of the full City Council packet, including EDA (Economic Development Authority),
is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the front of the Council
Chambers by the Secretary.
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda
—The following items are considered to be routine by the Economic Development
Authority (EDA) and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests, in which event the item
will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at the end of Commission
Consideration Items.
a. Approval of Minutes
—Commissioners not, present at meetings will be recorded as abstaining from the
vote on the minutes.
1. April 10, 2006 Regular Session
4. Commission Consideration Items
a. Resolution Approving Agreement Between City of Brooklyn Center EDA and
Tetra Tech EM, Inc. Regarding Environmental Investigative Work on the Logan
and 57�' Redevelopment Site
•Requested Commission Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
b. Resolution Authorizing Submission of an Application to the Hennepin County
Environmental Response Fund
•Requested Commission Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
5. Adjournment
i
EDA Agenda Item No. 3a
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
APRIL 10, 2006
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Regular Session and was
called to order at 7:57 p.m. by President Myrna Kragness.
2. ROLL CALL
President Myrna Kragness, Commissioners Kathleen Carmody, Kay Lasman, Diane Niesen, and
Mary O'Connor. Also present: Executive Director Michael McCauley, Assistant City
Manager/Director of Operations Curt Boganey, Planning and Zoning Specialist Ron Warren,
City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Deputy City Clerk Camille Yungerberg.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Lasman moved and Commissioner Carmody seconded to approve the agenda and
consent agenda and the following item was approved:
1. March 27 2006 Re ular Session
g
Motion passed unanimously.
4. COMMISSION CONSIDERATION ITEMS
4a. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-OS AMENDING PURCHASE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN EASTBROOK PROPERTIES, LLC, AND THE BROOKLYN
CENTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Executive Director Michael McCauley stated last year the Economic Development Authority
authorized an agreement that would have the EDA purchasing from the Minnesota Department
of Transportation excess MNDOT right-of-way and simultaneously transferring to Eastbrook
Properties for their residential subdivision. He stated the proposed resolution would extend the
time for completion and would require a deed restriction to insure only single family housing
could be built on the land.
David Evanson displayed an area map of the property and explained the phases of development.
04/10/06 1 DRAFT
He stated at the time of Preliminary Plat, they were under the impression that MNDOT would
approve the project in three months. He stated the process took 16 months to approve, indicating
several issues that needed resolution. He stated he was ill; however the primary delay was due to
the complications with MNDOT. He stated Wednesday is the scheduled closing on the MNDOT
parcel.
Commissioner Lasman moved and Commissioner Carmody seconded to adopt RESOLUTION
NO. 2006-OS Amending Purchase Agreement Between Eastbrook Properties, LLC, and the
Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority.
Motion passed unanimously.
5. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Carmody moved and Commissioner Niesen seconded adjournment of the meeting
at 8:08 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
President
04/10/06 2 DRAFT
EDA Agenda Item No. 4a
�i
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Tom Bublitz, Community Development Specialist
DATE: April 17, 2006
SUBJECT: Resolution Approving Agreement Between City of Brooklyn Center EDA
and Tetra Tech EM, Inc. Regarding Environmental Investigative Work on
the Logan and 57�' Redevelopment Site
A Contamination Assessment of the Economic Development Authority (EDA) Logan and
57 Redevelopment Site was completed by Tetra Tech EM, Inc. in February 2006, with
the financial assistance of Hennepin County's Environmental Response Fund (ERF).
Tetra Tech's contamination assessment addressed the following three main areas of
environmental concern:
l. On site Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) contamination from the former
drycleaner.
2. Potential off-site VOC contamination from the former drycleaner.
3. Potential on-site contamination from residual petroleum from two former
gasoline service stations.
A summary of environxnental observations and recommendations from Tetra Tech's
February 2006 Contamination Assessment of the site is shown by the following:
On-site Drvcleaner and Petroleum Related Contamination
A. Observation
Dry cleaning related groundwater contamination remains at the site at
concentrations exceeding state drinking water standards.
Recommendation
Install on-site monitoring wells, monitor for two quarters and report to MPCA for
review; upon approval, apply to MPCA for No Further Action Deternunation.
B. Observation
Dry cleaning related soil vapors may be associated with on site groundwater
contamination that could affect future redevelopment. Additional soil vapors
from residual petroleum contamination on-site may also affect redevelopment.
Recommendation
Conduct on-site soil vapor assessment. Evaluate the need for additional
investigation and/or remediation. Apply to MPCA for No Further Action
Determination.
Off-site Drvcleaner Related Contamination
C. Observation
Dry cleaning related groundwater contamination is present in a limited area off-
site at concentrations exceeding State drinking water standards.
Recommendation
Complete a water well survey and a database search in the affected area to insure
that residents are not using shallow groundwater. Apply to MPCA for No Further
Action Determination.
D. Observation
Soil vapors related to off-site groundwater contamination may be a concern for
overlying structures.
Recommendation
Complete a limited vapor intrusion assessment in a selected residence in the
release area. Evaluate the need for additional investigation andlor remediation.
The proposals from Tetra Tech EM, Inc.[see attached work plans] address the
environmental concerns listed above. It is recommended Tetra Tech continue with the
next round of environmental investigation. Based on Tetra Tech's work and familiarity
with the site staff believes Tetra Tech's continued work on the environmental
investigation of the site will be the most timely and cost effective. The EDA is not
required to conduct these additional environmental investigations by the MPCA, but in
order to obtain the various No Further Action Determinations from the MPCA, the
additional work is required. A No Further Action Determination from the MPCA is an
official letter from the MPCA that provides a degree of assurance regarding future
enforcement actions by the MPCA. It is anticipated that the No Further Action
Deternunations for the Logan and 57 site would reflect a situation where contamination
levels are found but at levels not significant as determined by MPCA staff.
The No Further Action Determination would also benefit future development of the site
by providing potential developers certain environmental assurances.
The high end of the dollar estimates for the total of the next phase of environmental
investigations of the site is $62,621.30. Copies of the work plans for the proposed
environmental work are included with this memorandum along with a contract with Tetra
Tech for the work.
Funding for the work plans prepared by Tetra Tech and included with this memorandum
will come from Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and, if funded, Hennepin County's ERF
grant monies. A Resolution Approving Agreement Between City of Brooklyn Center
EDA and Tetra Tech EM, Inc. Regarding Environmental Investigative Work on the
Logan and 57 Redevelopment Site has been prepared for EDA consideration.
Tetra Tech EM Inc.
2001 Killebrew Dr., Suite 141 Bloomington, MN 55425 TEL (612) 643-2200 FAX (612) 643-2201
�r r
April 17, 2006
Mr. Tom Bublitz
Community Development Specialist
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430-2199
Subject: Work Plan and Cost Estimate for Additional On-site Soil Vapor Assessment
Logan and 57�' Redevelopment Site
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
Dear Tom:
At the request of the City of Brooklyn Center (the City), Tetra Tech EM Inc. (Tetra Tech) has
completed this work plan and cost estimate to provide additional contamination assessment
services at the Logan and 57�' Redevelopment Site at 1900-2000 57�' Avenue in Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota (the Property). The purpose of the assessment is to perform additional
screening for on-site soil vapor impacts from chlorinated solvents and petroleum hydrocarbons.
Figure 1 depicts the general site location.
1.0 BACKGROUND
The Property is comprised of an approximate 8.5-acre area owned by the City. The Property is
currently vacant. Previous Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) activities completed
by Barr Engineering (Barr) and by Tetra Tech have indicated the presence of elevated
perchloroethylene (PCE) concentrations in groundwater samples collected at borings in the
vicinity of, and downgradient from, a subsurface structure located adjacent to a floor drain in the
northern portion of the former dry cleaning operation (Figure 2). In addition, the Property has
also had two Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) sites associated with it, and although
the LUST sites have been closed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), residual
petroleum hydrocarbon contamination has been identified on the southern portion of the Property
(Figure 2).
In order to meet potential MPCA concerns and to assist potential developers of the Property with
a determination as to the necessity for vapor control measures, the City has requested that
additional assessment activities be completed to further define the magnitude and extent of
potential soil vapor impacts on the Property.
Mr. Tom Bublitz
Work Plan and Cost Estimate
Logan and 57`" Redevelopment Site
April 17, 2006
Page 2
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
The proposed scope of work for contamination assessment activities is provided below. General
methodologies for assessment activities are provided in Section 3.0. Tetra Tech will prepare a
Health and Safety Plan prior to initiating assessment activities. Upon completion of site
assessment activities, Tetra Tech will prepare a summary environmental report detailing the
results of the site assessment activities and providing recommendations for managing identified
concerns.
2.1 On-Site Soil Vapor Impacts
In order to fui�ther assess concerns regarding the magnitude and extent of potential soil vapor
impacts on the Property Tetra Tech recommends the following initial assessment activities:
Install Gore-Sorber modules at the locations indicated on Figure 3. A Gore-
Sorber is a module designed for passive collection of soil vapors. The modules
are manufactured by W.L. Gore Associates (Gore) and have been verified for
use by the USEPA Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) program. The
modules would be submitted for analysis of eight VOC contaminants of concern.
The target VOC analyses would be BTEX, PCE, trichloroethene (TCE), total
petroleum hydrocarbon compounds in the gasoline range (TPHg), and total
petroleum hydrocarbon compounds in the diesel fuel range (TPHd).
Upon completion of the Gore-Sorber vapor screening, in order to quantify potential vapor impacts
in any identified areas of concern near the former dry cleaning operation, Tetra Tech recommends
the following:
Select four locations in potential areas of concern on site using the mapping data
provided by Gore (section 3.6)
Advance four Geoprobe direct push test borings to approximately 10 feet below
grade at locations selected to provide representative radial soil gas samples of the
presumed VOC source area.
Collect soil vapor samples using Summa� canisters in accordance with MPCA
Vapor Intrusion Assessment guidance: April 2005.
Submit soil vapor samples for analysis using EPA Method TO-15.
I
Mr. Tom Bublitz
Work Plan and Cost Estimate
Logan and 57`� Redevelopment Site
April 17, 2006
Page 3
3.0 METHODOLOGIES
This section presents site assessment methodologies.
3.1 Gore-Sorber Soil Vapor Screening Survey
Modules will be installed using the guidelines detailed by Gore. A location survey is conducted
to identify all of the sample locations before installing the Gore-Sorber modules. The
installation method consists of using a slide hammer or a small diameter auger drill to advance a
small pilot hole approximately %2 to '/4 inch in diameter to a depth of 2.5 to 3 feet. Using an
insertion rod, the Gore-Sorber module is placed into the small hole. The module is secured at the
surface by a polypropylene cord attached to a cork that is used to seal the hole for the duration of
the sampling. The Gore-Sorber modules are left in the ground for a minimum of 14 days to
collect chemicals from the soil gas vapors. Each sample point will be identified by a unique
numeric code issued to the specific Gore-Sorber module.
3.2 Discreet Soil Vapor Sample Collection
Discreet soil vapor samples will be collected using Summa� canisters in accordance with MPCA
Vapor Intrusion Assessment guidance provided in Guidance Document c-prp4-Ola: April 2005.
A Geoprobe system will be used to collect soil-gas samples through disposable post-run
polyethylene tubing running from the tip of the probing unit to the valve of a Summa canister.
Two volumes of the sampling tubing will be purged prior to sample collection.
Each sample will be identified using a 3-component, alphanumeric system that identifies the
client, sampling area, and unique sample number. The client designation will be"BC". Each
sample collected will be identified with up to a four-character alphanumeric code corresponding
to the sampling area as the example below illustrates:
"GP1" for samples collected at Geoprobe test boring location number one
Each predetermined sampling location will have an alphanumeric location identifier to further
designate the sampling location. The numbering scheme will indicate the depth at which the
sample is collected. Examples of the full numbering scheme are presented below.
BC-GP1-1 Sample collected at one foot below grade at test probe location
number 1
Sampling activities will be documented on field logs using a waterproof pen. The time af
collection, sample number, sampling location, sampling depth interval, field observations,
analyses, and sampler's name will be recorded in the logbook for each sample.
Mr. Tom Bublitz
Work Plan and Cost Estimate
Logan and 57`� Redevelopment Site
April 17, 2006
Page 4
3.3 Sample Handling and Documentation
Gore-Sorber Vapor Screening Survey
Upon completion of the duration of the screening survey, each module will be removed and
placed in the laboratory-supp�ied container with the corresponding identification number.
Samples will be transported by overnight courier to the Gore Screening Modules Laboratory iri
Elkton, Maryland. Chain-of-custody documentation will be filled out in the field on laboratory
supplied chain-of-custody forms. Tetra Tech will appoint one field technical sta.ff person as the
sample custodian. Upon completion of all required documents, the sample custodian will sign
and date the documents and list the time of sample collection. The custodian will also confirm
ri tive information on the chain-of-custody forms, which will be
the com leteness of all desc
p P
included with each shipping container.
Discreet Soil Vapor Sample Collection
Samples will be labeled and transport to the analytical laboratory. Chain-of-custody
documentation will be filled out in the field on laboratory supplied chain-of-custody forms.
Tetra Tech will appoint one field technical staff person as the sample custodian. Upon
completion of all required documents, the sample custodian will sign and date the documents and
custodian w
ill also confirm the com leteness of all
n The P
list the time of sam le collectio
P
descriptive information on the chain-of-custody forms, which will be included with each
shipping container
3.4 Decontamination Procedures
Gore-Sorber Vapor Screening Survey
The slide-hammer tips, auger drill bits, insertion rods, and any other down-hole equipment used
to install the Gore-Sorber modules will be rinsed with deionized water following each use.
Disposable equipment such as single-use nitrile gloves will be used when handling each module
to minimize the possibility of cross contamination.
Discreet Soil Vapor Sample Collection
Macrocore soil samplers and outer casing piping (if utilized) will be decontaminated between
each borehole by the drilling contractor. Hydraulic push rods will be decontaminated following
or prior to each sampling days activities. Decontamination of drilling equipment will include a
wash with Alconox soap and water solution followed by a rinse with tap water. The sampling
and drilling equipment will be allowed to air dry prior to re-use.
Disposable equipment such as single-use nitrile gloves and polyethylene tubing will be used
whenever possible to minimize the possibility of cross contamination.
Mr. Tom Bublitz
Work Plan and Cost Estimate
Logan and 57`" Redevelopment Site
April 17, 2006
Page 5
3.5 Mapping
Gore-Sorber Vapor Screening Survey
Soil sample locations will be documented on scaled field maps. The sample location map will be
submitted to Gore in an electronic format, e.g. CAD, ArcGIS, etc. Upon completion of the
analysis, Gore will proyide Tetra Tech with a color-graded concentration map of the analytical
results on site using the range of concentration results. A separate map will be prepared for each
of the requested analytes. These evaluations will assess the relative high, low, and non-detect
concentration areas, and will not determine concentrations of chemicals of concern in the soil
vapors directly for the purpose of risk evaluations; however, these surveys will be extremely
useful in targeting areas and locations were additional direct sampling of the soil vapors could be
conducted to determine the concentration data needed for further human health risk assessment.
Discreet Soil Vapor Sample Collection
Soil sample locations will be documented on scaled field maps. The soil vapor sampling
information and data will be utilized as part of a Geographic Information System (GIS) and
database management system being developed for the project.
4.0 HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES
All field activities will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Health and Safety Plan
(HASP), which is being prepared by Tetra Tech for the sampling activities proposed at the
Properiy. Prior to initiation of field activities, all field personnel will read and sign the HASP to
indicate that they understand the plan and agree to operate in accordance with its requirements.
Daily health and safety meetings will be conducted prior to the start of sampling activities, and
all Tetra Tech personnel will attend these meetings. A copy of the HASP will be kept on-site
and will be easily accessible to field personnel.
5.0 TIlVIELINE
Field work will commence after receiving approval from the City. Installation and collection of
the Gore-Sorber modules is expected to take no more than three days with two separate
mobilizations to the site. Between the installation activities and the collection activities, the
Gore-Sorber modules will be allowed to collect chemicals of concern for at least 14 days.
Field work for discreet soil vapor sample collection will take no more than one day to complete.
A draft summary report will be issued within 15 working days of receiving final analytical
results from the analytical laboratory. Typical laboratory turnaround time for the proposed
analyses is 10 working days.
Mr. Tom Bublitz
Work Plan and Cost Estimate
Logan and 57�' Redevelopment Site
April 17, 2006
Page 6
6.0 COST ESTIMATE
Estimated costs for the completion of the project activities described in this work plan are
provided in the attached spreadsheet.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this work plan, please contact either of the
undersigned at (612) 643-2200.
Sincerely,
`�..�c..�, C
David Duffey Scott C. Tracy, CH1VIl��
Environmenta.l Scientist Senior Project Manager
cc: Mr. Thomas Maiello, Angel Environmental Management, Inc.
I
s:wrel<as�maokhn cemenllmena N�erk.nmo�et.m.e
y A t, a .�+z* 1 y 3� 3 Y� t
o r f�`. s 3y 'C �l d r�
s 3
p
�s` �^4 3� T t
m x W ,a
C' t�'• ,g�"-,�r,�,� .f .-.L q 'q��a� `"<i.
y ',,t ,,4 x ��n.�. r��� �s w a�� y r
c�
3 a .:�'.,�,,,d 4 j�, ,z��'�� '��i� t
7 9 a;� ��r�?. �r iM r .'r g ���x Mawnd �ern
r �w 2. m a 5� z. L` M��� f a.
r 4 g 1 J ��"A �3' k.F ¢4'�.: x t,
ie< M c
3 T Q;(� L'
W %4�������� t� h
cn y f's k 1 y'� T t i 2 1 4 4
x �Y€ l A4 Y s!
9 q�� 3�fi g e a �n F q r
��S .4r� ASqv Q S� ��k'
O f 1 r, S f�.
a ry µM��! f* �h"#� :^FYg ��v� s k
+�r ��€i z �y�.�x yt, Y �r r �ys� 4
O I QI �1 N
d Y, i x .t'� s g�� t �.s� k
a l�,.� �i .j �x ��'r e
m k r:as.,� ��n t �����'vY r t`��
m q p 4!t .r Y i a�a� q�. X �a
m 1 1 •x�,, x r� w E x�_ �,xa n+ z {r v� I
z. i C.
4 y.�. 2'� i
3
1
X
a F 9 1 y� 'r
F ��rl� M "�w. g�- t1
O �,5",�.,�a ..�,�P',.s� f c� 1 g^
N �I i: r r k: r tF i
N y
y i l: y�t_ x r ��t�' �f`� �T� n ,i Y
a fE .L M I
��5x.. s �.L..�
sx Y
r ..se:-
���i t ti U �y �y'� d� z:.�� �5f_.. ^w..�., 4 :,�s� c�`
�J r� 1 v�
p F+T.� t x� �'i �t",� �s"� b r �,r 2:x•, t
q�'
r� "r L_�__�.,r s x i ��,f e *T�, x 11� �j :....�t.� ��`°a� 1'
o #��r'. ,a��.-� p �*�_.���(,1`��lti .a.< s�� a1, T tf=� ��i r I
m .d�y. �3�y �r 4�h �x�,"� f#w 7�-^s�� .t r� {�,�L_,.i
r s ,t� z a t�.,+«. �s
�1 �.;.�5zd a 2;`�.. g a a 1 n.z- ,.u�� q
�c 7 s� :_�`X�° 4�.'`t�' .,�x N ��9 4 [�;t)
s y
r
_jCA1.7ItlL .'t?:: ,',"3�.��� rn i Y. "4 q� I
Y r
r -k 9„r �"t;��* �x� x: '�`��k t��A �%ffi s �j �I�.
f .�'�k:�i 8 `F'� �,S�k...�,�t x��:�� ���,��n s?� �l �i.,._.! i
�s
.,8"'giu r �5�; 5 3ti".^w r N �1..�
����#K �^�z�..�T" r4 xri� a�l,ii 'ti t i r i i
W p r q s i �..t,.G �k v� d��r �,t,s v �t�, a t
"`��2 r x �a
r .r c s x �y 'V6:s a� y��
r O �"�,.d-. :.�Y� s�t a y a�`. �7+� �4._
�I 0
r
�r u �.tt�v t�� s i. t:
y 7� D ��`a�� �4 '��G
7 F.�tf. �A i... ...�'ak�s `.::,F'�" .�Y ]k v 4' 9.': Y�'.
�s�"w���,� �a'��'�s; v:���"� '3°'� '�,'y J�`�`� �.eV: .,,tSt� 4 X ¢pt�"`��i 'k
f Ti5 ?'f,?.� 54 �s 2
r
3. C ��b�'�"' �r� tz:-i::; �.�'s.�' :+�+r�' �r.�.� s 5� r �i �'f,.�� f�
N e �T x ,n,rD� '�ua' 1�rro. a, �.,x;� �r a
r�.
f
e i,y� ,�a t
hee .,n�. Y S 'S
.a ��'r' �t' �a�+� cy
i
7 y �r�..�
't 4 1
�!1 .::r.. �.M
f
al. f/1 r++ �rk t i i Fw�""...,n, n'�,,, r'.+�.
>c. O (7 _„x ,r"' 4 R"``�
rt g fs i :r r yt,�-�,.. 3 t ''�sti�.
7 w Y'� �,,,+r"". J s
(p i...y,v^ sx
3 f
1
Y r fi 11��s '1m„
^t �.r ,r;
'�j a r`
0
C
ti
0
o�
r
Q 0 Forr�er
X Dry Cleaner
S
d
Parking
Lot
0
m
0
5
D
3
N
Buildfng A Z
Residential
Parking
Lot
Parking Building O
Lot B
Building C
CForMer Gas�
Station) iype�rlter O
L
L L�
57th Avenue N
Approxlr�ate Location of I I
�N� ForMer Gas Station
o' ioo'
SCALE:1'e100'
Hmong-American Shopping Center
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
FIGURE 2
SITE LAYOUT
Q Tetra Tech EM Inc.
I
l
o
ti
0
C�
o,�
a
O
Q 9
k� `2'
S
d
O r
0
co
P
3
C D
3
O CU C Z
Re
O O
0 n
0
57th Avenue N
1
o
s��:,=.,—oo.
Hmong American Shopping Center
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
O Proposed Gore-Sorber
Sample Location Figure 3
Proposed Gore-Sorber
Sampling Points
Q Tetra Tech EM Inc.
NOTE Demolished on-site structures depicted for reference
Cost Estimate w
On-Site Soil Vapor Sampling Tetra TeCh
Logan and 57th Redevelopment Site 2001 Killebrew Dr., Suite 141 Bloomington MN 55425
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota �(G12) 643-2200 FAX (612) 643-2201
April 17, 2006
Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost
TETRA TECH EMI COSTS Units Low High Rate Low High
TASK 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/MPCA LIAISON/MEETINGS
Senior Project Manager hour 15 25 $110.00 $1,650.00 $2,750.00
Field Supervisor hour 4 6 $70.00 $280.00 $420.00
Field Technician hour 8 12 $45.00 $360.00 $540.00
Clerical hour 2 4 $40.00 $80.00 $160.00
Other Direct Expenses lumn 1 2 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00
Task 1 Subtotal: $2,420.00 $3,970.00
TASK 2 CONDUCT SOIL VAPOR SCREENING AND SAMPLING
Senior Project Manager hour 0 4 $110.00 $0.00 $440.00
Field Technician hour 8 12 $45.00 $360.00 $540.00
Gore-Sorber (installation/removal) day 2 3 $950.00 $1,900.00 $2,850.00
Analytical (S-compound VOC) sample 31 31 $27730 $8,596.30 $8,596.30
Geoprobe (install and abandon) day 1 1 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00
Analytical (TO-15) sample 4 4 $265.00 $1,060.00 $1,060.00
Other Direct Expenses day 3 4 $125.00 $375.00 $500.00
Task 2 Subtotal: $14,091.30 $15,786.30
TASK 3 DATA ANALYSI5/FINAL REPORT PREPARATION
Senior Project Manager hour 15 20 $110.00 $1,650.00 $2,200.00
Field Supervisor hour 4 8 $70.00 $280.00 $560.00
Field Technican hour 10 20 $45.00 $450.00 $900.00
Clerical hour 3 5 $40.00 $120.00 $200.00
Other Direct Expenses luma 1 2 $150.00 $150.00 $300.00
Task 3 Subtotal: $2,650.00 $4,160.00
Total Cost Estimate $19,161.30 $23,916.30
Tetra Tech E�l! Inc.
2001 Killebrew Dr., Su+te 141 Bloomington, MN 55425 TEL (612) 643-2200 FAX (612) 643-2201
April 17, 2006
Mr. Tom Bublitz
Community Development Specialist
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430-2199
Subject: Work Plan and Cost Estimate for On-Site Groundwater Monitoring and Water
Well Receptor Survey
Logan and 57�' Redevelopment Site
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
Dear Tom:
At the request of the City of Brooklyn Center (the City), Tetra Tech EM Inc. (Tetra Tech) has
completed this work plan and cost estimate to conduct groundwater monitoring activities and
complete a groundwater receptor survey at the Logan and 57�' Redevelopment Site at 1900-2000
57 Avenue in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (the Property). Figure 1 depicts the general site
location.
1.0 BACKGROUND
On-site Drv Cleaner Related Groundwater Contamination
Previous Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) activities completed by Tetra Tech
have indicated the presence of elevated perchloroethylene (PCE) concentrations in groundwater
samples collected on-site. PCE concentrations were identified below and in the vicinity of the
former dry cleaner building at concentrations exceeding Minnesota Department of Health
drinking water standards.
The City has been requested by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to further
characterize contaminated groundwater at the Property in order to obtain a No Further Action
Determination letter for PCE and other volatile organic compounds in groundwater. In
particular, the MPCA has requested that permanent monitoring wells be installed at the Property
and that two or three rounds of groundwater samples be collected to evaluate site conditions.
Mr. Tom Bublitz
Groundwater Monitoring/Receptor Survey Work Plan and Cost Estimate
Logan and 57`� Redevelopment Site
April 17, 2006
Page 2
Off-site Drv Cleaner Related Groundwater Contamination,
Previous Phase II ESA activities completed by Tetra Tech for the Property have indicated the
presence of elevated PCE concentrations in groundwater samples collected off-site downgradient
from the Property. PCE was identified in a plume extending approximately 2 to 3 blocks
southeast of the Property at concentrations exceeding Minnesota Department of Health drinking
water sta.ndards. The groundwater interface in the area was encountered at approximately 15 to
20 feet below grade.
The groundwater receptor survey is necessary to obtain a No Further Action Determination from
the MPCA for off-site PCE and other volatile organic contamination in groundwater.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
On-site Groundwater Monitoring
The proposed scope of work for contamination assessment activities is provided below. Tetra
Tech will prepare a Health and Safety Plan (HASP) prior to initiating assessment activities.
Upon completion of site assessment activities, Tetra Tech will prepare a summary environmental
report detailing the results of the site assessment activities and providing recommendations for
managing identified concerns.
In order to further assess VOCs in groundwater on the Property, Tetra Tech recommends the
following:
Installation of a minimum of the three permanent groundwater monitoring wells to
monitor contaminant concentration trends with time. One well would be installed along
the western Property boundary in the presumed upgradient groundwater flow direction
from the former dry cleaner. Two additional wells would be installed along the eastern
Property boundary in the presumed down-gradient groundwater flow direction from the
former dry cleaner. Based on observed site geology, Tetra Tech recommends
constructing the wells in accordance with MPCA and 1VIDH guidelines with 10-foot long,
0.010-slot screens set at depths of approximately 10 to 20 feet below grade to intercept
the local water table interface.
Completion of three rounds of quarterly groundwater monitoring for VOCs using an
MI'CA-approved analytical laboratory and method to establish concentration trends.
If contaminant concentrations appear stable or decreasing with time, Tetra Tech would
recommend that the City of Brooklyn Center request a No Further Action Determination
from the MPCA with regard to on-site groundwater impacts.
i
Mr. Tom Bublitz
Groundwater Monitoring/Receptor Survey Work Plan and Cost Estimate
Logan and 57�' Redevelopment Site
April 17, 2006
Page 3
Water Well Recentor Survev
Tetra Tech is proposing to conduct a water well receptor survey at residences located within
approximately '/2 block of the boundaries of the groundwater contamination plume to the southeast
of the Property as depicted in Figure 5(attached) from the Contamination Assessment Summary
Report prepared by Tetra Tech for the Property. In general, Tetra Tech proposes to conduct a door-
to-door survey of households located neaz the site to determine the presence of water wells. The
survey will consist of asking the resident if there are any private water supply wells present on the
property. If the resident is not at home at the time of the survey, a simple questionnaire will be left
regarding the presence of private water wells on the property. Tetra Tech will follow-up via
telephone with those residents who receive the questionnaire after the survey. Tetra Tech will also
conduct a database search for water wells within a'/2 mile radius of the former dry cleaner using
the County Well Index system.
Upon completion of water well receptor and submittal to the MPCA, Tetra Tech would
recommend that the City of Brooklyn Center request a No Further Action Determination from
the MPCA with regard to off-site groundwater impacts.
3.0 METHODOLOGIES
This section presents site assessment methodologies.
3.1 Monitoring Well Installation and Development
Tetra Tech will install and develop all wells at the Property in accordance with NIDH
regulations, including submittal of appropriate permit applications and well installation
notification forms. All wells will be abandoned in accordance with MDH regulations upon
completion of groundwater monitoring activities at the Property.
3.2 Sample Handling and Documentation
Groundwater samples will be collected by a field technician following well stabilization.
Disposable bailers, gloves and rope will be used for each well and will be changed between
wells. All samples collected will be labeled and transported to the analytical laboratory with
appropriate chain-of-custody documentation. Tetra Tech will appoint a field technical staff
person as the sample custodian. The sample custodian will confum the completeness of all
descriptive information on the chain-of-custody forms, which will be included with each
shipping container. Depth to groundwater measurements will be collected at each monitoring
well during sampling events.
Mr. Tom Bublitz
Groundwater Monitoring/Receptor Survey Work Plan and Cost Estimate
Logan and 57�' Redevelopment Site
April 17, 2006
Page 4
3.3 Mapping
Well locations will be documented on scaled field maps. The sampling information and data will
be utilized as part of a Geographic Information System (GIS) and database management system
being developed for the project.
4.0 �IEEAI.TH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES
All field activities will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific HASP, which will be
prepared by Tetra Tech for the sampling activities proposed at the Property. Prior to initiation of
field activities, all field personnel will read and sign the HASP to indicate that they understand
the plan and agree to operate in accordance with its requirements. A copy of the HASP will be
kept on-site and will be easily accessible to field personnel.
5.0 TIlVIELINE
Field work will commence after receiving City and MPCA approval of work activities. Well
installation and development is expected to take no more than 2 working days to complete.
Groundwater samples will be collected at 3-month intervals following the installation of the
monitoring wells. A draft summary report will be issued within 15 working days of receiving
final analytical results for the final round of groundwater samples. Typical laboratory
turnaround time for the proposed analyses is 10 working days.
The water well receptor survey is expected to take no more than 2 working days to complete.
Follow-up phone calls are expected to be completed within 5 additional working days. A draft
summary report will be issued within 10 working days of receiving final resident responses.
6.0 CO5T ESTIMATES
On-site Groundwater Monitorine
The estimated cost for the completion of the groundwater monitoring activities described in this
work plan is expected to range from $14,435 to $20,000, depending on the number of rounds of
sampling needed. Detailed costs are provided in the attached spreadsheet.
Water Well Recentor Survev
The estimated cost for the completion of the water well receptor survey described in this work
plan is expected to range from $4,620 to $8,740. Detailed costs are provided in the attached
spreadsheet.
Mr. Tom Bublitz
Groundwater Monitoring/Receptor Survey Work Plan and Cost Estimate
Logan and 57`�' Redevelopment Site
April 17, 2006
Page 5
If you have any questions regarding this work plan or cost estimate, please contact Scott Tracy at
(612) 643-2220.
Sincerely,
`���j VG
Richard W. Van Allen, PG
Geologist
Scott C. Tracy, CHIvI1��I
Senior Project Manager
cc: Mr. Thomas Maiello, Angel Environmental Management, Inc.
s� 3 ,ID, Vv x� +°-ia �j l'd�$ ���1 �a�N�� 71 I�
w `S d Y s r
`9�.`+. b'��, C L 1} R� 1px
a:.z r� V iY1T
x
w
s�g i
w
at� �i i St t F1
V� Y t a y t� �����s� i
r
t r �y a.
a rF s. .,as i t
�T j.�
s`�� �..,��,f���-� 't ��1 j
�c� i j i t I:�n 3
r
R Pa€k 5
f
1 a •�1 w
x a�n,„ �r„ f"�"� �(F !j� 4 t
sr.._
�t� r :z �5P
k''�� rt j�
2 f
t
�86� E-� �r„ v��� 4 r �r
F �'�a y` g ��t/{ "'^r..r, �Et Y�.N
Sy'� 2�� f F�.. Yr ��3
1� z� Z ii '�i. ��i� {��f wG�n� p"�.�� 1,i� �r
ri �ro"�'' x w s s !�'.��F
i! iC6 g,� t f
I xfk�w� l� t ^2 �a. 3 r f Y� f �,a�
r r �11R z� A i„�
i zx i y�. .rr y.:� 1 �4 ���s. s f..
r r
3; t
O
z 2''�� b� p
�r� '�s �r.. ��.6
>"`+�s y
v �'n',
s A.
Tz f" �tt� �a i��'
3��
c
,.`��5. t fMI�! *�s� r ^�z ,t�' s�
�s� tir �i 1
rf��■ a �tt m} �t l
a,o �A► y t i 1
s
I j I'"�i �,,,a,���� �f. 4�
�a SITE
Park �t.,,,, rt xq
ni t a�v� a��
T �,p x.� �Y` i
i e i.'
T �.,iGnS r a' V.7
J A T
��tR i '�"�`«a E
c: a ,r t'..: �k -n �"r"�� Y z�� 4
4 s. e .s� �'�S� �hx d *�e.,'� yz +A y
r d q. h" k
y� p
Y x
v S g i� :t� "A�F C k`��'s w'.�., "�n.'x
�/o 'n.�*' 'ra i x
8u r '9 L
S r: x �:7 ��k a �1
r
0 4 „A t q
3 a s v �t aa �a x* ��a' �t�
x� �z 2 d a� ��j
f!i7}lL K 'j 5 4 KSi' 2'�4: �c,^yh"° r S L
i
J
i: t t ty i
s;
q r.
s� Sr ''t
x"�' y �xi E a
12 d a;
4
r� �r
.o,F���� ?g�
a ,�t„ �i `,�c R n�`
A b
v.s� �4. F °�k v -.ra� R :4'.:.
s
�k„ `-s i 3
E t i 4 Fl Y' F 'S` ��1
s nY r n �15 iW"" y* "�.�i r« a
t 5 S k 4 a e� �s:: 1
4a� R 5 �X i�. 4 8 .'''1 b;; 2`�a n L_,�..-
a e �y t .4
�"'�3,� -u� ra s..�ti..
Source: Map adapted from USGS Topographic Quadrengle: Minneapolis North (1993), Minnesota.
Hmong-American Shopping Center
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
y N
Figure 7
MIhN.
Site Vicinity Map
i 0 025 0.5
�JJ1t'3RRNGLE LOCATIQN TET`F�AT�CH
L Miles
g J
I
I
i.
i, ��i 71''.
5
I
;�ns:.
�7.,
R
x::
c i.,
i. y,,•
Y
r ,F;x
sr�a.�mm�.M.�c.n.v� �v�w...mlr�.i.��a Rrouas
Soil Vapor Sample Locations (Oct 2005)
Fomier HmongAmeriwn Shopping CeMer
1900 57th Avenue
Groundwater Sample Locations PCE Concentrations in ug/L (Sep-Oct 2005) s�ky�, c�r� Minnesota
100 ug/L PCE Inferred Extent Fig�re s
0 20 40 80 120 160 �'s�� Sample LoCation5
and Iaferred Contamioant Plume
50 ug/L PCE Inferred Extent F�r
F+�;, f �`emx�ecN it�c:
��;„l 7 ug/L PCE Inferred Extent
Cost Proposal
On-Site Groundwater Monitoring reCh
Logan and 57th Redevelopment Site 2001 Killebrew Dr., Suite 141 Bloomington MN 55425
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota -(612) 643-2200 FAX (612) 643-2201
Apri117, 2006
Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost
TETRA TECH EMI COSTS Units Low High Rate Low High
TASK 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/MPCA LIAISON/MEETINGS
Senior Project Manager hour 20 32 $110.00 $2,200.00 $3,520.00
Field Supervisor hour 4 7 $70.00 $280.00 $490.00
Field Technician hour 4 7 $45.00 $180.00 $315.00
Clerical hour 4 5 $40.00 $160.00 $200.00 i
Other Direct Expenses lumn 1 2 $250.00 $250.00 $500.00
Task 15ubtotal: $3,070.00 $5,025.00
TASK 2 INSTALL, SAMPLE AND ABANDON ON-SITE WELLS
Senior Project Manager hour 4 6 $110.00 $440.00 $660.00
Field Supervisor hour 12 16 $70.00 $840.00 $1,120.00
Field Technican hour 32 40 $45.00 $1,440.00 $1,800.00
Drillers (install and abandon) well 3 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00
Analytical (VOCs)* sample 10 15 $145.00 $1,450.00 $2,175.00
Other Direct Expenses day 3 4 $250.00 �750.00 $1,000.00
Task 2 Subtotal: $9,420.00 $11,255.00
TASK 3 DATA ANALYSIS/FINAL REPORT PREPARATION
Senior Project Manager hour 4 10 $110.00 $440.00 $1,100.00
Field Supervisor hour 8 12 $70.00 $560.00 $840.00
Field Technican hour 16 24 $45.00 $720.00 $1,080.00
Clerical hour 3 5 $40.00 $120.00 $200.00
Other Direct Exvenses lumn 1 2 $250.00 $250.00 $500.00
Task 3 Subtotal: $2,090.00 $3,720.00
Total Cost Estimate $14,580.00 $20,000.00
Indicates direct contractor cost to be passed through to City
Cost Proposal
Groundwater Receptor Survey T T
Logan and 57th Redevelopment Site 2001 Killebrew Dr., Suite 141 Bloomington MN 55425
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (612) 643-2200 FAX (612) 643-2201
Apri117, 2006
Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost
TETRA TECH EMI COSTS Units Low High Rate Low High
TASK 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/MPCA LIAISON/MEETINGS
SeniorProjectManager hour 6 12 $110.00 $660.00 $1,320.00
Field Supervisor hour 3 6 $70.00 $210.00 $420.00
Clerical hour 1 2 $40.00 $40.00 $80.00
Other Direct Expenses lumn 1 2 $250.00 $250.00 $500.00
Task 1 Subtotal: $1,160.00 $2,320.00
TASK 2 DOOR TO-DOOR SURVEY AND QUESTIONNAIRE
Field Supervisor hour 16 30 $70.00 $1,120.00 $2,100.00
Field Technican hour 16 30 $45.00 $720.00 $1,350.00
Other Direct Expenses day 1 2 $75.00 $75.00 $150.00
Task 2 Subtotal: $1,915.00 $3,600.00
TASK 3 DATA ANALYSIS/FINAL REPORT PREPARATION
Senior Project Manager hour 4 8 $110.00 $440.00 $880.00
Field Supervisor hour 4 8 $70.00 $280.00 $560.00
Field Technican hour 11 16 $45.00 $495.00 $120.00
Clerical hour 2 4 $40.00 $80.00 $160.00
Other Direct Expenses lumn 1 2 $250.00 $250.00 $500.00
Task 3 Subtotal: $1,545.00 $2,820.00
0 8 740.00
$4 620 0
Total Cost Estimate
�,w
Tetra Tech EM Inc.
2001 Killebrew Dr., Suite 141 Bloomington, MN 55425 TEL (612) 643-2200 FAX (612) 643-2201
y
April 17, 2006
Mr. Tom Bublitz
Community Development Specialist
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430-2199
Subject: Work Plan and Cost Estimate for Soil Vapor Intrusion Sampling
At a Single-Family Residence
Logan and 57�' Redevelopment Site
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
Dear Tom:
At the request of the City of Brooklyn Center (the City), Tetra Tech EM Inc. (Tetra Tech) has
completed this work plan and cost estimate to provide one round of soil vapor intrusion samplin�
for a residence downgradient from the Logan and 57�' Redevelopment Site at 1900-2000 57
Avenue in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (the Property). Figure 1 depicts the general site location.
Due to concerns raised by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) regarding potential
risks associated with chronic exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from
contaminated groundwater originating at the Property, the City has requested that a"worst case"
soil vapor intrusion assessment be completed to assess the potential for VOC impacts to affect
residences in the vicinity of the Property.
1.0 BACKGROUND
Previous Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) activities completed by Tetra Tech
have indicated the presence of elevated perchloroethylene (PCE) concentrations in groundwater
samples collected downgradient from the Property. PCE concentrations generally were detected
in a band extending to the southeast of the Property for approximately 2 to 3 blocks. This band
appeared to extend approximately 20 to 40 feet laterally and appeared to be concentrated at the
groundwater interface.
In order to address concerns regarding potential migration of vapors in off-site residential areas
from VOCs in groundwater, Tetra Tech collected soil vapor samples at locations selected to provide
representative radial soil gas samples downgradient of the presumed VOC source azea. These
locations also provided samples from locations between the assumed axis of contaminated
groundwater and basements of existing residential structures.
Mr. Tom Bublitz
Work Plan and Cost Estimate for Soil Vapor Intrusion Sampling
Logan and 57'�' Redevelopment Site
Apri117, 2006
Page 2
These results were all below the Minnesota Department of Health's March 2002 acute Health
Risk Values (HRVs) for VOCs in ambient air; however, some VOCs were above published
national standards for chronic and carcinogenic health risk.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
The proposed scope of work for contamination assessment activities is provided below. It
should be noted that this is an interim step in the assessment process, mtended to provide
quantitative data that will be used to further refine additional assessment and/or response actions
related to soil vapor impacts originating from the Property.
General methodologies for assessment activities are provided in Section 3.0. Tetra Tech will
prepare a Health and Safety Plan (HASP) prior to initiating assessment activities. Upon
completion of site assessment activities, Tetra Tech will prepare a summary environmental
report detailing the results of the site assessment activities and providing recommendations for
managing identified concerns.
In order to further assess concerns regarding potential migration of vapors in off-site residential
areas from VOCs in groundwater, Tetra Tech recommends the following:
Identify a"worst case" residence within the presumed soil vapor plume from the PCE.
Inspect the residence for potential vapor entry points, such as cracks in foundations, sumps,
or other subsurface exposures.
Interview residents to establish other potential sources of VOCs within the home.
Place Summa canisters and collect vapor samples using Summa canisters in accordance
with the methodology provided in Section 3.
Submit samples for analysis using EPA Method TO-15.
Mr. Tom Bublitz
Work Plan and Cost Estimate for Soil Vapor Intrusion Sampling
Logan and 57�' Redevelopment Site
A ril 17 2006
P
Page 3
3.0 METHODOLOGIES
This section presents site assessment methodologies.
3.1 Indoor Air Sample Collection
Indoor air samples will be collected in general accordance with the U.S. EPA OSWER Draft
Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils
(Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance). For the collection of indoor air samples for laboratory
analysis, Summa canisters with flow controllers will be placed at the presumed worst-case vapor
accumulation locations (i.e. basement sumps, cracked foundation locations, etc.) within the
residence, as well as in the breathing zones for the basement and the first floor by a Tetra Tech
field technician, who will document the initial time of sample collection and who will retum at a
pre-designated interval (typically, 24 hours) to close the canisters and document the end of the
sample collection.
Each predetermined sampling location will have an alphanumeric location identifier to further
designate the sampling location. The numbering scheme will indicate the house at which the
sample is collected as well as the location of the sample within the house.
3.2 Sample Handling and Documentation
Samples will be labeled and transported to the analytical laboratory. Chain-of-custody
documentation will be filled out in the field on laboratory supplied chain-of-custody forms.
Tetra Tech will appoint a field technical staff person as the sample custodian. Upon completion
of all required documents, the sample custodian will sign and date the documents and list the
time of sample collection. The custodian will also confirm the completeness of all descriptive
information on the chain-of-custody forms, which will be included with each shipping container.
3.3 Mapping
Sample locations will be documented on scaled field maps. The sampling information and data
will be utilized as part of a Geographic Information System (GIS) and database management
system being developed for the project.
4.0 HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES
All field activities will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific HASP, which is being
prepared by Tetra Tech for the sampling activities proposed at the Property. Prior to initiation of
field activities, all field personnel will read and sign the HASP to indicate that they understand
the plan and agree to operate in accordance with its requirements. A copy of the HASP will be
kept on-site and will be easily accessible to field personnel.
Mr. Tom Bublitz
Work Plan and Cost Estimate for Soil Vapor Intrusion Sampling
Logan and 57'� Redevelopment Site
April 17, 2006
Page 4
SA TIMELINE
Field work will commence after receiving MPCA approval of work activities and is expected to
take no more than 3 working days to complete, with a draft summary report issued within 15
working days of receiving final analytical results. Typical laboratory turnaround time for the
proposed analyses is 10 working days.
6.0 COST ESTIMATE
The estimated cost for the completion of the project activities described in this work plan is
$9,965.00. Detailed costs are provided in the attached spreadsheet. If the MPCA requests a
second round of vapor sampling, the additional costs would be approximately $2,500.00.
If you have any questions regarding this work plan or cost estimate, please contact either of the
undersigned at (612) 643-2200.
Sincerely,
l�' �1. �r��
Richard W. Van Allen, PG Scott C. Tracy, CHMM
Geologist Senior Project Manager
cc: Mr. Thomas Maiello, Angel Environmental Management, Inc.
w a v �r a a,� ts� La 9f u: r '.fl� c
-�.����5��§'� T �l�ai 4�r �AW� r�`l� �y,
1:
�k� �a' J j m
c r'
5 v �;`��i5 •c '"'y4� �y
�Rr k i.. i
c
y
r a F�KL'S'�11!!
��r �x. i s Gf' 'y 4
.i �r
r
r r i
i
u f
h F
F`8tk
I
`'s= k i
F �..y�
�:�J 1
J r a� =�+•al j.
Y Y, 1� I
!R. AF 4r: �S�;'�,�. :1 .C... i Y
£fl p��
C'b ��s/ 4;- XF' fi.'Wn' il.
a� a �&f;t I, I
.Y p �a .a� �7 •s y.
�a� °�r i► �IE
"C�,. �n �K
r �'���J��„� w �r t n •f e
i f ,p
s n v" i"v v S!: E�t
v• '4� N i�. M g�' ea�; k �r ,:a' rr
4�
.�S �.��fi 1� ,t r� s x
��c.:
�C
ff ria lx f<`l i
9 �ah �.+1. �S�.II Y 1�.� s
L rs Y $F�i a �v r�r %Z� ",ry �'�f b �t,.
f t
t A y �.i i� i
y x �'�'���'+��V l?
t
v *p rtJ j°r k $46 s� �1�
ry
`a €."`�a �#k ��C" s a� y T
�M' �tt""5 g -s t W a a t� d
i
.yd- :'l A Kk b
'�'''�xi a &r u a acc
S s z�; r
5 y L 3' `'s.<. +�az� �x, ZS
r v i ■�AE 7 1
v��>
i MI sa r�' Y•
r'r ;M e.„ K��.
t
.t� ra SITE
5
x
5 y vy �i... i r'� ��z u e ,fi�c 4
r�r,� t Lipns 4 ��i F� �w �u �W
c PBiw .�r�` a s S'�'� f R�
C 1+, r x '�s
p x° �L �a�3 `a�. v 'a s�
S 4 �c
���s�s k� x ,x., g�.. ��+lt€. ��w t'� �f
A i
a, �W e 1
Cb' t r �i F '��fl r
s, 5���� :xa. i' c� "z' ht
ti y
�4 3� r 1 �g„�'FV� 3 t 'l
a b F.,a''`� u� v� F 9'��'G C �"P�' 4�
a 3� a t� z
s E T F J 't f '�I a'x x� 3 S
x` r A P
,.m ��..;�s,�.. ..�s �'t .n, +w. v�' s �fj� ss �`i w».f c`�+� t:
s iP-
i
z �Si r a
6 1/ �c:? e a' s§ s �i.� #s ry �.a 5� �j
a� S G ���IE:kt 3 :7�e`
a I
a
j •^t I a.:
"�*z�. a�
��`r�. Q i� yy. ��O i z� e f
d m�.."��,<6'�"�,; s r» rr �'y'�� t �l�1
v �.�..,n.....��. 2� i 1 t�Yi a'�,
t�
.i .a� cv. :y 'a` �A�" 4 f �Q
�+a SYp' �1 P W: 3�. =xx'3
�zi �.e ti. a�,,aa
Source: Map adapted from USGS Topographic Quadrangle: Minneapolis North (1993), Minnesota.
Hmong-American Shopping Center
g Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
N Figure 1
MthN.
Site Vicinity Map
0 0.25 0.5 w
�tJA13P.a1aG�E ��GA:TiDN TETRAl3'�+�H
Miles
a
I
I
Cost Proposal
Soil Vapor Intrusion Assessment Tetra TeCh
Logan and 57th Redevelopment Site 2001 Killebrew Dr., Suite 141 Bloomington MN 55425
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota �(612) 643-2200 FAX (612) 643-2201
Apri117, 2006
Estimated Estimated
TETRA TECH EMI COSTS Units Quantity Rate Cost
TASK 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Senior Project Manager how 20 $110.00 $2,200.00
Field Supervisor hour 6 $70.00 $420.00
Field Technician hour 2 $45.00 $90.00
Clerical hour 3 $40.00 $120.00
Other Direct Exnenses lumn 1 $150.00 $150.00
Task 1 Subtotal: $2,980.00
TASK 2 INDOOR ATR ASSESSMENT (ONE RESIDENCE)
Senior Project Manager hour 2 $110.00 $220.00
Field Supervisor hour 3 $70.00 $210.00
Field Technican hour 8 $45.00 $360.00
Analytical (VOCs) sample 5 $300.00 $1,500.00
Other Direct Expenses day 1 $125.00 $125.00
Task 2 SubtotaL• $2,415.00
TASK 3 DATA ANALYSIS/FINAL REPORT PREPARATION
Senior Project Manager hour 8 $110.00 $880.00
Senior Risk Assessor hour 16 $125.00 $2,000.00
Field Supervisor hour 8 $70.00 $560.00
Field Technican hour 16 $45.00 $720.00
Clerical hour 4 $40.00 $160.00
Other Direct Expenses lump 1 $250.00 $250.00
Task 3 Subtotal: $4,570.00
Tetra Tech EMI Total Cost Estimate $9,965.00
Notes: Cost estimate is for one round of vapor sampling.
Cost estimate assumes two meetings with City and/or MPCA staff to discuss sampling results.
An additional round of vapor sampling would cost approximately $2,500
Contract
This Agreement made this 24th day of April, 2006 by and between Tetra Tech EM, Inc.,
hereinafter called the Contractor, and the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of
Brooklyn Center, hereinafter called the Owner, witnesseth:
That the Contractor and Owner, for the consideration stated herein, agree as follows:
I
Scope of Work
The Contractor shall furnish all of the labor, materials and equipment, and perform all of the
work described in the Contract Documents for the following:
On-Site Groundwater Monitoring and Water Well Receptor Survey, Additional
On-Site Soil Vapor Assessment and Soil Vapor Intrusion Sampling at a Single Family
Residence for Logan and 57 Redevelopment Site.
The Contractor shall do everything required of this Agreement and the Contract Documents,
and all work shall be done in the best and workmanlike manner and shall be wholly responsible for
the performance and completion of such work.
II
Commencement and Completion of Work
The Contractor shall commence work under this Contract upon execution of the contract and
shall complete the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. The Contractor shall notify the
Owner in writing of any and all causes of delay of such work or any part thereof within three (3) days
of the beginning of such delay.
The Contractor shall complete all necessary contract work and services, drawings, and
specifications not later than as specified by the Contract Documents. This Contract shall continue
until final completion of and acceptance by the Owner of the work performed by the Contractor
unless sooner terminated by either party upon 15 days written notice to the other.
III
The Contract Sum and Payment
The Owner shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Contract according to the
provisions and rate schedule set forth in the Contract Documents and the proposals submitted by the
Contractor on April 17, 2006.
The Owner agrees to remit payment to the Contractor within thiriy days after receipt of such
statement submitted by the Contractor. Final payment shall be made upon completion and
acceptance by the Owner of all the work called for hereunder. The Owner may require the
Contractor to fiunish evidence to the Owner showing that all claims for labor, material, and other
obligations arising hereunder are proper.
1. Abandoned or suspended work. If any work performed by the Contractor is abandoned
or suspended by the Owner in whole or in part, and if the Contractor has complied with
all the terms of this Contract, the Contractor shall be paid for services perfonned, not to
exceed the amount stipulated in the Contract Documents, as performed to the date of
receipt of written notice from the Owner for such abandonment or suspension.
2. Payment for extra services of the Contractor requested by Owner. For extra services
not included in the Contract Documents, the Owner shall pay the Contraator on an hourly
basis in accordance with the schedule of rates attached hereto. If requested, the
Contractor shall provide a maximum cost to accomplish the work; said costs shall not be
exceeded without written consent of the Owner's representative.
IV
Owner's Representative
An employee of the Owner shall act as the Owner's representative with respect to the work to
be performed under this Contract. Said employee shall have complete authority to transmit
instructions, receive information, interpret and define the Owner's policy and decisions with respect
to the materials, equipment, elements and system pertinent to the work covered under this Contract.
V
Independent Contractor
Contractor shall be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee for the Owner.
Neither Contractor nor any of its employees shall be employees of the Owner for purposes of Social
Security, state or federal income ta�c withholding, Worker's Compensation, unemployment
compensation or any other purpose.
Insurance and Indemnification
Insurance: The Contractor shall secure and maintain insurance, in accordance with the
contract documents and attached Exhibit A, as will protect Contractor from claims under the
Worker's Compensation acts and from claims for bodily injury, death, or properry damage and
professional liability which may arise from the performance of services under this Contract.
In addition to the kinds and amounts of insurance specified in E�chibit A, the Contractor shall
indemnify and hold harmless the Owner and the City of Brooklyn Center, their officers and
employees from all suits, actions, or claims of any character brought as a result of bodily injury to
persons or of damage to property arising out of the Contractor's negligent or otherwise wrongful act
or omission, including a breach of a specified contractual duty.
VII
Licensing
The Contractor shall comply with all required licensing requirements for work done under
this Contract during the entire course of the Contract.
VIII
Contract Documents
Contract Documents shall consist of the following component parts:
1. The accepted Proposals of the Contractor dated April 17, 2006 for:
On-Site Groundwater Monitoring and Water Well Receptor Survey.
Additional On-Site Soil Vapor Assessment.
Soil Vapor Intrusion Sampling at a Single Family Residence.
2. Addenda and Change Orders.
3. This Instrument.
This instrument, together with the documents hereinabove mentioned, form the Contract,
and they are as fully a part of the Contract as if hereto attached or herein repeated.
IX
Amendments
The Contract between the Contractor and Owner may be modified only by a written
amendment executed by both Owner and Contractor.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed in
duplicate as of the day and year first above written.
CONTRACTOR:
Tetra Tech EM, Inc.
By:
OWNER:
Economic Development Authority in and for
the City of Brooklyn Center
B��
Michael J. McCauley
EDA Executive Director
i
EXHIBIT A
_,:-r.�-�.�v..:. i r L+ .t .j.:.r.c:1'. i
r� A5r- d t s ,i�� x�`-.� �,,�-i-� '�i �g (SSUE DATE (MM1GOlY17
a�:1►[:�t. ��CE�tTt�F�C�'� yOk�:.IN�UR�IC���
ss�^+:s��:d'JkC�rs«�:r�_�.a.^i "��'1.��„z•°.�"rt�.t��.i.".�'�`4?�:��.'�t�,��:���.�'�'���xv4r'��-�r' G. :5.:i. y
PRODUCER 7HlS CERTIFICATE IS lSSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND
CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON TNE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE
DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COYERAGE AFFORDED BY THE
POLICIES BELOW
i
S COMPANIES _AFFORDING COVERAGE
AMP�E C �o�P,�,,,
NTIqqC
�KS�A� -c ER $5p,O C
COMPANY C on►rRa�-
LETTER �s
i co�uP�,r►r p
�rr�a
r.�.�_
co►�PnNr E
LETfER
1
..,x, Y.c•r� 4'l ,em e+ ''t +.s ._i...._.-. ;R...,.:.+
'CO�If F3A�1��i' z r �.-�i_3 w s�� �i Y -'a.�:�ut�,;� .��i"y-",� a 5:;�
s�.c5�--s �r,,, �~v "t ..,��.:.w%�.°��.lc�x,:a�:�y+..,..:'r..tti;�
THtS iS TO CERTIFY TliAT THE POUCIES OF INSURANCE USTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POUCY PERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANOING ANY REQUtREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CEATIFICATE MAY BE iSSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
IXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICtES. UMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
TYPE OF IN3URANCE POLICY NUMBER s POUCY EFFECTIVE �P�uCY E%PIRATIOI� UM(TS
L i DATE (MMIDD/YY) DA7E (MMIDDlYY)
V GENEAAI ACaGRECaATE S�L UOO OOO
cok►��cu� uas+urr i i PROOUCTS-co�iP�oP n�a. s 2, UOO,.00t3
cuuas w,oe (specify) 1 l P�soru� a r►ov. uwua�r s s
w,�
i OWNER'S l CONTRACTOR'8 PR T. i iEACH OCCURRENCE �i L� UOO OOU
i E ons flrs 6
I X� Contractual_ flRE DAMACi (MY
i ,►�nEV. ExPENSe Uwy au p�son} s
�uroe�oe�� unenm i COMBINED SINGLE 2� OOU, OUO
uM�r
�rrr �uro
x i ALL ONMED AUTOS i j BODILY INJURY S
SCHEDULED AIJTOS i Pe
S
X� HIRED AUTOS DILY INJURY s
i�NON-OWNED11UT03
i j dARAGE WBILRY 's DAMAGE S
�PROPERTY
t EXCESS LIABILI7Y i EACH OCCURRENCE i
L r
f UMBREW FORM i i AGGREGATE_
I F
E_ OTHER T1iAN UMBRELLA FORM 1 1
I i STAMORY UMITS
WORKER'8 �'ANPENSATWN EACH i 1 �U UUU
�`'''o i j nis�+se—roucr unaR s 5 00 000
f ENPLOYERS' LUBIUTY i DISEASE—EACH EMPLOYEE S],vO. OOO
OTNEti
i j
a
i
t
i i
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATlONSIVEN�C1.ESfSPEpAL ITEMS
�olicy to include a waiver of any or all Goverameatal Immunity
List project and work
.4 .i.F n
CERTIFICATE ��'�'a'°: .:�:'_:CANCELLATION
t Authori lIl SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
evelo men MPANY WILL E1aDER'0'OR
�onomic D p t3' PiRanoN DATE THE OF, THE iSSUINt3 CO
Rto
and for the City of Brooklyn Center p�q�L 3 V DAYSSfHRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE H�LDER NAMED TO THE
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway �eFr, sur
Braoklyn Center, MN 55430 R�a��vxtr�va�r�c�+'�TSA�rsv�
AIJTIIORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
TETRA TECH
2006-2007 CONSULTING FEE SCHEDULE
EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION HOURLY RATE
PRINCIPAL 130.00 150.00
SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER 110.00 130.00
SENIOR SCIENTlST/ENGINEER 95.00 110.00
PROJECT MANAGER 85.00 95.00
SCIENTIST/ENGINEER 75.00 85.00
SENIOR FIELD SCIENTIST/ENGINEER 65.00 75.00
FIELD SCIENTIST/ENGINEER 55.00 65.00
FIELD TECHNICIAN I 45.00 55.00
CLERICAL 35.00 40.00
LEGAVEXPERT TESTIMONY 1.5 x Houriy Rate
Weekend, holiday, and emergency response work may be at rates higher than fee schedule.
Contact project manager for applicable rates.
SUBCONTRACTOR FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES FEE
SUBCONTRACTOR INVOICES PROCESSED BY TETRA TECH
$1,000 and under COST 10%
$1,001 to $10,000 COST 8%
$10,001 and above COST 5%
EMPLOYEE REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES COST 15%
SHIPPING COURIER EXPENSES COST 15%
PROJECT-SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES VARIES
TETRA TECH
2006-2007 CONSULTING FEE SCHEDULE
EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE FEE
LEVEL B FIELD WORK (per person) $200.00/day
1.75" SUBMERSIBLE PUMP 200.00/ wk
LEVEL C FIELD WORK (per person) 150.00/day
GENERATOR 100.00/day
DATALOGGER 90.00/day
PHOTOIONIZATION DETECTOR (PID) 90.00/day
CGI/OXYGEN METER 80.00/day
PRODUCT/WATER INTERFACE PROBE 65.00/day
SURVEY EQUIPMENT 65.00/day
COMPANY TRUGK RENTAL day minimum) 75.00/day
PRESSURE TRANSDUCER 50.00/day
VIDEO CAMERA 40.00lday
FIELD SUPPLIES 25.00/day
LEVEL D FIELD WORK (per person) 25.00/day
WATER LEVEL INDICATOR 25.00/day
PORTABLE COMPUTER 20.00/day
DIGITAL CAMERA 10.00/day
EXPLOSIMETER 15.00/day
BAILER USAGE 15.00 ea.
WATER FILTRATION EQUIPMENT 15.00 ea.
HAND AUGER/SOIL PROBE 15.00/day
SLUG TEST EQUIPMENT 10.00/day
Note: Equipment not listed on this fee schedule may be procured and billed in accordance
with project specific requirements. Fee schedule subject to change on an annual basis.
i
Commissioner introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
EDA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF BROOKLYN
CENTER EDA AND TETRA TECH EM, INC. REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL
INVESTIGATIVE WORK ON THE LOGAN AND 57� REDEVELOPMENT SITE
WI-�EREAS, a Contamination Assessment was completed by Tetra Tech EM, Inc.
on the Economic Development Authority's Logan and 57�' redevelopment site on February 10,
2006 (the site); and
WHEREAS, the data presented in the February 2006 Contamination Assessment
has resulted in recommendations from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for
additional environmental investigative work relative to the site; and
WHEREAS, Tetra Tech EM, Inc. has prepared proposals and work plans for
additional environmental investigation of the site pursuant to MPCA recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the EDA has determined it is in the best interest of the City to have
Tetra Tech EM, Inc. conduct additional environmental analysis of the site.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development
Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that tlie EDA Executive Director is
hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Tetra Tech EM, Inc. for the
following environmental work plans:
1. Work plan for additional on site soil vapor assessment dated April 17,
2006.
2. Work plan for on-site ground water monitoring and water well receptor
survey dated April 17, 2006.
3. Work plan for soil vapor intrusion sampling at a single family residence
dated April 17, 2006.
Date President
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by commissioner
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
EDA Agenda Item No. 4b
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Tom Bublitz, Community Development Specialist
DATE: April 17, 2006
SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Submission of an Application to the Hennepin
County Environmental Response Fund
This resolution would authorize the EDA to submit an application to the Hennepin
County Environmental Services Department for funding under the County's
Environmental Response Fund (ERF).
The details of the application and background information on the grant request can be
found in staff inemorandums relative to the Resolution Approving an Application to the
Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund in the Council items and the staff inemo
for the previous EDA resolution relative to this item.
Commissioner introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
EDA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE
HENNEPIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND
WHEREAS, an application requesting grant funds from the Hennepin County
Environmental Response Fund has been prepared for submission by the Economic Development
Authority (EDA) of Brooklyn Center; and
WHEREAS, the grant funds will be used for environmental investigation of the
Logan and 57 redevelopment site located in Brooklyn Center.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the EDA in and for the City of
Brooklyn Center� that the Environmental Response Fund application is hereby authorized for
submission to the Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services.
Date President
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by commissioner
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declaxed duly passed and adopted.