HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009 10-27 HCA AGENDA
BROOKLYN CENTER
HOUSING COMMISSION
October 27, 2009
7:00 p.m.
Council/Commission Room
Brooklyn Center City Hall
i
1. Call to Order: 7:00 p.m.
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda
4. Approval of Minutes September 15, 2009
5. Chairperson's Report
6. Council Liaison Report
7. Chair's Report on Appeal Regarding Certain
Compliance Orders Relative to Chapter 12 of
the City Code. NOTE: See enclosed
September 28, 2009 City Council Minutes
(excerpt pp. 7 -9 and Resolution 2009 -118).
8. Discussion of July 12, 2009 Housing
Commission Minutes and Next Steps
9. Other Business
Mayor Willson stated his opposition to allowing the property owner to submit an application
prior to the 90 day period of time.
Councilmember Lasman clarified that the intent of the motion on the floor was that the
resolution will not be acted on prior to staff presenting the amended resolution for Council
review.
The motion and the second on the floor were withdrawn.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Mayor Willson seconded to table a Resolution Making
Findings of Fact and Order Relating to 4216 Lakebreeze Avenue North to the October 12, 2009,
City Council meeting.
Mr. LeFevere advised that tabling the proposed resolution provides Council with an opportunity
to start this discussion again two weeks from now with a resolution that is unchanged other than
the addition of tonight's testimony. There will be two different options presented to Council in
relation to the 90 days for application or issuance of the license.
Councilmember Roche voted against the same. Motion passed.
�Ob. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -118 ADDRESSING APPEAL OF CERTAIN RENTAL
v INPECTION COMPLIANCE ORDERS FOR 5909 JUNE AVENUE NORTH IN
BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA
Mr. Boganey introduced the item, discussed the history, and stated the purpose of the proposed
resolution.
Councilmember Roche moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to open the hearing.
Motion passed unanimously.
City Prosecutor Bill Clelland presented Council with the staff recommendation on rental
compliance orders under Chapter 12 of the City Code as it relates to the appeal of the Chapter 12
Compliance Order submitted by Ms. Janine Atchison, rental property owner of 5909 June
Avenue North.
Ms. Janine Atchison, property owner of 5909 June Avenue North, addressed the City Council
and stated her concerns in relation to the appeal of rental license compliance orders of Chapter
12 of the City Code. Ms. Atchison stated her position that the City has not afforded her due
process by providing information related to the compliance order in a timely manner.
Mr. LeFevere requested clarification on whether Ms. Atchison is requesting additional time to
prepare for the appeal due to her concerns regarding due process. Ms. Atchison replied that she is
asking that the City follow rules, and that the City follow the rules for due process. She is not as
prepared as she could be, but is willing to tell her side of this tonight. Ms. Atchison outlined the
following concerns in regards to the compliance order for 5909 June Avenue North:
09/28/09 -7-
Inconsistency of the current drafting of City Ordinance Section 5- 204(f) requiring hard
wired smoke detectors for duplexes in relation to the Minnesota State Building Code.
Compliance order for City Ordinance Section 12- 402(3) regarding the repair or
replacement of improperly maintained refrigerator door gasket.
Ms. Atchison stated her position that the subject refrigerator is working fine and has a
good seal. She stated the paperwork provided to the Council is incorrect in stating that the
gasket is pulling away, and that this has been changed from the original information.
There is a crack but the refrigerator is still easily maintaining a temperature of 40 degrees
and meets the definition of this code. Ms. Atchison further stated her position that the
Housing Inspector has not provided proof that the refrigerator is not working properly,
and that this order is going above and beyond what is allowed to be written into City
Code.
Ms. Atchison stated she fully expects to keep her property in good condition, and it is an asset to
the neighborhood. It is an owner occupied duplex; she lives next door. It is the responsibility of
her as a citizen and the City to get together on these things and be consistent and fair. Codes need
to be enforced; it is important for them to look at this and say what they should be enforcing. She
requested an opportunity to respond to any further information provided by Mr. Clelland.
.Councilmember Ryan stated his position as an individual that has worked in the heating and air
conditioning industry, that if the loss of seal is significant, the system will be unable to continue
to maintain the temperature over time.
Councilmember Lasman suggested that this item could be tabled to obtain information from a
refrigerator manufacturer on whether the gasket needs to be repaired in order for the refrigerator
to operate effectively.
Mr. Clelland stated the issue before the City Council is whether the City can properly require a
damaged or defective gasket to be repaired or replaced so that he refrigerator is operating. There
are two concepts. One is the refrigerator and the second is the stated purpose. Ms. Atchison is
arguing that even if the gasket is broken, if it is not that bad she does not need to fix it. He stated
the ordinance requires repair of broken windows. Ms. Atchison would say if the window is
broken but it keeps the rain out she does not need to fix it. In fact you do, and tenants need
assurance that the refrigerator will be working and not simply holding temperature for one day
and failing soon thereafter. Mr. Clelland stated the fact of the Building Official is that the gasket
needed repair. There does not seem to be dispute that it is an essential part of a properly working
refrigerator. The focus for the Council is whether it is proper interpretation of the ordinance not
only that a refrigerator be required, but that it be in good working order. As to due process, Ms.
Atchison is educated in this field and was first notified of the violation in June of 2009, and has
had more than ample time to respond.
Ms. Atchinson stated her position that the inspector has stepped well beyond the ordinance and
that the Housing Commission agrees with her assessment.
Councilmember Roche moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the hearing.
09/28/09 -8-
Motion passed unanimously.
Councilmember Lasman stated her position on tabling the item has changed after considering
Mr. Clelland's comments regarding defective parts.
It was noted that the Housing Inspector is trained, qualified and certified, and there is no reason
to believe he would not be able to make a professional judgment regarding the item in question.
Mayor Willson moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to approve RESOLUTION NO.
2009 -118 Addressing Appeal of Certain Rental Inspection Compliance Orders for 5909 June
Avenue North in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota.
Motion passed unanimously.
10c. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -119 AUTHORIZING TERMINATION OF EXISTING
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS RICHARDSON PARK PLAT 1989 AND
RICHARDSON PARK 2ND ADDITION —1990)
Mr. Boganey introduced the item, discussed the history, and stated the purpose of the proposed
resolution.
i
i
Councilmember Roche moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to approve RESOLUTION
NO. 2009 -119 Authorizing Termination of Existing Subdivision Agreements (Richardson Park
Plat 1989 and Richardson Park 2nd Addition 1990).
Motion passed unanimously.
10d. AMEND 2009 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE
Mr. Boganey introduced the item, discussed the history, and stated the purpose of the
amendment to the 2009 City Council meeting schedule.
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to amend the 2009 City
Council meeting schedule to add October 5, and November 2, 2009, at 6:30 p.m. for Budget
Work Sessions with the Financial Commission.
Motion passed unanimously.
11. COUNCIL REPORT
Councilmember Yelich reported on his attendance at the following events:
September 15, 2009, Firehouse Park Neighborhood gathering.
September 15, 2009, Park and Recreation Commission Meeting. There was considerable
input on the Capital Improvement Program, as well as issues dealing with Evergreen and
Firehouse Parks.
09/28/09 -9-
Member Tim Willson introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -118
RESOLUTION ADDRESSING APPEAL OF CERTAIN RENTAL INSPECTION
COMPLIANCE ORDERS FOR 5909 JUNE AVENUE NORTH IN BROOKLYN
CENTER, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, the City Council serves as the Board of Appeals regarding appeals of
City Code Chapter 12 regarding regulation of rental properties; and
WHEREAS, Janine Atchison, landlord of 5909 June Ave N, appeals the
interpretation of two city code compliance orders regarding smoke detectors and refrigerator gasket
maintenance; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Appeals finds that the City Ordinance Section 5 -204f
requiring all battery operated smoke detectors to be replaced by hard -wired smoke detectors by
December 31, 1993 is in conflict with the current Minnesota State Building Code; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Appeals finds that the improperly maintained
refrigerator gasket is in violation of City Ordinance Section as indicated by the
compliance order; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the city to ensure rental properties are
maintained to minimum property maintenance standards in order to protect the public's health,
safety and general welfare in accordance with city and state codes; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that:
1. The enforcement of City Ordinance Section 5 -204f requiring hard -wired smoke
detectors be discontinued for duplexes to be consistent with Minnesota State
Building Code.
2. City staff review options for amending City Ordinance Section 5 -204f.
3. The compliance order regarding the repair of the gasket per the city's rental
inspection Compliance Notice be enforced. The appellant shall have 30 days from
the date of this resolution to correct the violation.
September 28, 2009
9 Date Mayor
ATTEST: V/
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Mark Yelich
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof
Tim Willson, Kay Lasman, Tim Roche, Dan Ryan, and Mark Yelich;
and the following voted against the same: none;
whereupon said resolution was. declared duly passed and adopted.