HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993 07-12 FCA•
AGENDA
BROOKLYN CENTER FINANCIAL COM MSSION
July 12, 1993
City Hall
Conference Room B
1. Call to Order: 7:00 P.M.
2. Roll call.
3. Approval of Minutes: May 11, 1993
May 17, 1993
4. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
5. Organizational Evaluation Process.
6. Criteria for evaluation of requests for funding by outside agencies or groups.
• 7. Adjournment: 9:00 P.M.
0
• MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE FINANCIAL COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
MAY 11, 1993
BROOKLYN CENTER CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Donn Escher called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. in the
City Hall Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL
Present at roll call were Chair Donn Escher, Commissioners, Viola
Kanatz, Pat Boran, Ulyssess Boyd and Denis Kelly. Also present
were Council Liaison Dave Rosene, City Manager Gerald Splinter and
Finance Director Charlie Hansen. Commissioner Ned Storla arrived
at 7:36 P.M.
Charter Commission
Brooklyn Center Charter Commission Chair Bev Wolf sent a letter
requesting input as to changes which might be needed to the City
Charter. The idea of creating term limits at 12 years was
discussed. Council Liaison Dave Rosene will contact her to relay
this suggestion.
Finance Commission Membership
Council Liaison Dave Rosene presented the proposal that the
membership be increased from seven to nine. The City Council is
considering this because of the upturn in citizen interest and
because the Human Rights and Resources Commission wishes to
increase their membership to meet their workload. After a
discussion, the Finance Commission indicated that they feel seven
members works well for this commission and see no need for a
change.
Capital Expenditure Policv
Commissioner Pat Boran presented the Capital Expenditure Policy as
currently written and noted that only the General Fund and the
Capital Improvements Fund have unrestricted Fund Balances which
need an expenditure policy. Finance Director Charlie Hansen
presented alternatives to two sections of the policy. First was in
the section titled "AUTHORITY TO SPEND" paragraph A. which reads:
Expenditures from $0 to $100,000: Not eligible for funding
from the capital improvements fund. Funding required through
the general fund.
Hansen recommended reducing the $100,000 limit to $50,000. It will
be difficult to fund projects of this size from the General Fund
given the budgetary pressures existing there. City Manager Gerald
Splinter endorsed this change. The Commission decided not to
reduce the limit.
•
• Second was in the section titled "SPENDING LIMITATION/FUND BALANCE
REQUIREMENT:" paragraph C. which reads:
Fund Balance Requirements: At all times the unrestricted
portion of the capital improvements fund must be at least 25%
of the general fixed asset fund and exceed the total
expenditures for the first three years of the capital
improvements plan.
After discussion,,it was decided to replace it with the following:
Fund Balance Requirements: At all times, a minimum fund
balance shall be maintained in the amount of $3,000,000 as of
January 1, 1993 and increased by the Consumer Price Index each
year thereafter.
Commissioner Dennis Kelly moved that the Capital Expenditure Policy
be approved as revised and referred to the City (Council.
Commissioner Pat Boran seconded the motion. Commissioners Boyd,
Escher, Storla, and Kanatz voted in favor of the motion. The
motion passed.
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Commissioner Ned Storla and seconded by
Commissioner Pat Boran to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed
unanimously.
0
• MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE FINANCIAL COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
MAY 17, 1993
BROOKLYN CENTER CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER
Commissioner Pat Boran called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. in
the City Hall Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL
Present at roll call were Commissioners Viola Kanatz, Pat Boran,
Ulyssess Boyd,and Denis Kelly. Also present were Council Liaison
Dave Rosene, City Manager Gerald Splinter and Finance Director
Charlie Hansen. Commissioner Ron Christensen arrived at 7:20 P.M.
Oraanizational Evaluation Process
City Manager Gerald Splinter made a presentation on the process and
stated that the City plans to hire an intern to help do the needed
research. A discussion of the purpose and objectives followed. By
consensus it was decided to proceed on the following agenda:
1. Have the intern study staffing and supervision levels through
data available from the Stanton Survey.
2. Do a full cost analysis of one or two departments on a pilot
basis.
3. Support having the City Manager investigate doing full cost
analysis of all departments.
At 8:02, Commissioner Pat Boran left the meeting and Commissioner
Ron Christensen assumed the Chair.
City Manager Gerald Splinter presented the Budget Calendar for the
1994 General Fund Budget and highlighted areas added as a result of
the joint City Council/Finance Commission meeting.
Commissioner Ned Storla arrived at 8:16 P.M.
Severance Policv For Laid Off Emolovees
The severance benefits as adopted by the City Council was reviewed.
Commissioner Vi Kanatz stated there is potential trouble if the
City were to reduce the package now. It has become part of the
City's compensation package and is now subject to collective
bargaining. There also is no reason to recommend a further
increase in the absence of one of the bargaining units requesting
it. After further discussion, it was decided to take no action and
continue the item to a future agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Commissioner Vi Kanatz and seconded by
Commissioner Ned Storla to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed
unanimously.
0
0 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
POLICY RELATING TO CITY CONTRIBUTING TO
NONPROFIT HUMAN SERVICE PROGRAMS AND/OR AGENCIES
General
The City of Brooklyn Center is aware that there are many
worthwhile nonprofit human service programs and agencies serving
metropolitan area residents, and that such organizations are
supported primarily through public and private contributions.
Contributions to such organizations from the City of Brooklyn
Center, when made, will be distributed in accordance with this
policy.
Purnose
To develop an effective method for receiving and considering
requests made to the City of Brooklyn Center from nonprofit
human service programs and agencies.
To maximize the benefits to the citizens of Brooklyn Center
from the limited resources available for human services
contributions.
To maintain objectivity and equity in granting contribution
requests.
• To provide a means of monitoring and responding to community
needs and interests that may change from year to year.
General Policv Guidelines
The Brooklyn Center City council is responsible for determining
whether a financial or in-kind contribution will be made by the
City to assist nonprofit human service programs or agencies. The
City Council will consider the following guidelines in
determining which nonprofit human service program(s) or
agency(ies), if any, receive contributions from the City. This
policy should not be construed to obligate the City Council to
provide financial or in-kind human service contributions.
1. The City Council shall contribute to nonprofit human
service programs or agencies for one year, with the
option for further contributing after review and
approval by the City Council on an annual basis. All
requests for contributions must be submitted to the
City by May 1 for consideration for the following
fiscal year (January 1 to December 31).
2. The City Council shall give special consideration to
Community Social Service Act priorities established
annually by the Northwest Hennepin Human Services
Council and to annual needs assessment findings of the
Brooklyn Center Human Rights Commission.
-1-
3. The City Council will give high priority to
contributing to programs or agencies which can
demonstrate that the contributions are used to provide
services to Brooklyn Center residents.
4. The City Council will give preference to contributing
to nonprofit human service delivery programs or
agencies that act as an advocate and advisor regarding
other available human services for the Brooklyn Center
population.
5. Contribution requests will normally be considered in
relation to existing City human service commitments and
the target populations served.
6. The City Council may request proposals from a variety
of alternative sources.
7. Preference will be given to programs or agencies which:
A. Have taken affirmative efforts to raise funds to
support their efforts.
B. Demonstrate in their budgets that there is a
continuing concentration on minimization of
administrative and overhead costs.
C. Cannot be effectively or fully funded through other
sources.
D. Sponsor programs which have verifiable benefits to
the community at large; for example, programs that
enhance the effectiveness of City service delivery
programs.
E. -Make effective use of volunteer skills and in-kind
contributions to reduce the cost of program/service
delivery.
8. Final approval of requests are subject to the City's
public hearing and budget approval process.
Contribution Reauest Guidelines
The completion of the following procedures is the responsibility
of the City Council.
1. A letter specifying the required information for
consideration for contributions and the deadline for
application will be sent to the programs and agencies
that have previously requested and received
contributions from the City. This information will be
• available to other interested parties upon request.
-2-
• 2. All written requests for contributions must be
submitted prior to May 1 for consideration for the
following fiscal year (January 1 to December 31). An
Application for Contributions form must be filled out
completely and submitted as part of the written
request.
3. The City Council may request an oral explanation of the
written request from each applicant prior to
establishing priority rankings.
4. Upon request of the City Council, the Brooklyn Center
Human Rights Commission will be available, in an
advisory capacity, to research and monitor groups
receiving City contributions.
5. City staff may make contribution recommendations to the
City Council based upon use of the Evaluation Form for
Contributions Requests.
Needs Assessment Guidelines
On an annual basis, the Human Rights Commission will conduct a
needs assessment in the area of human service needs of the
community by reviewing the resources listed.
A. Community Social Service Act priorities established by
. the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council
B. Priorities established by the United Way
C. Local newspaper reports on human service needs or
issues
D. Community Emergency Assistance Program (CEAP)
priorities
E. Applications for Contributions, City of Brooklyn Center
(for nonprofit human service program/agency)
F. Ministerial Association priorities
G. Other appropriate sources
Additional efforts shall be made to monitor the community by
methods available to the Human Rights Commission at the time of
assessment.
An annual report outlining current human service needs in
Brooklyn Center will be prepared by the Human Rights Commission
and submitted to the City Council for review. This report may be
accompanied by specific recommendations for action by the City to
deal with human service needs.
•
-3-
•
•
EVALUATION FORM FOR CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Applicant Program/Agency Name-
Address-
City, State, Zip-
Contact Person-
Phone Number-
Date Application Submitted-
Budget Year Requested-
Score each statement based on the maximum points listed in parentheses next to each item.
The higher the score, the more the actual request is equated to the statement. A total of
100 points is possible. For Y/N responses, select Y for yes or N for no.
A. PROGRAM OVERVIEW (20)
(10) 1. The applicant has a realistic view of their resources and the
program is limited to their level of competence. The applicant
indicates the availability of an effective staff.
(5) 2. The applicant has demonstrated the ability effectively to reach
its target/demographical and geographical areas.
(5) 3. The methodology employed to measure the program is
effective, clear, and concise.
B. BUDGET (30)
(10) 1. The total amount requested from the City of Brooklyn Center
is reasonable given the overall program budget.
(10) 2. The budget request is reasonable given the objectives of the
proposal for the contribution period.
(10) 3. The administrative and program service costs are in reasonable
balance.
(Y/N) 4. The use of volunteers is reasonable and cost effective.
March 1992
C. CONIlN1UNITY NEED (30)
(10) 1. The applicant is meeting an important community need.
(10) 2. The extent of this service does not overlap with services
provided elsewhere in the community.
(10) 3. The number of Brooklyn Center residents served is high in
relation to the amount requested.
D. ORGANIZATION NEED (20)
(10) 1. The program is not viable without local government support.
(10) 2. There are few, if any, alternate sources of funding available to
the applicant.
TOTAL SCORE
0
r
APPLICATION FOR CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
• CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
(FOR NONPROFIT HUMAN SERVICE PROGRAM/AGENCY)
Date Submitted-
(Deadline is June 1 for consideration for the following fiscal year, January 1 to
December 31.)
Applicant Program/Agency Namw
Address-
City, State, Zip-
Phone Number-
Contact Person-
PROGRAM OVERVIEW
1. Generally describe the program/agency, including its mission, date established,
services, and goals.
2. Explain the areas of expertise of the program/agency, including a description of the
range of staff capability.
3. Describe the target group for services of the program/agency.
•
March 1992
-1-
•
•
4. Describe how the program is marketed, and to what geographical and
demographical areas.
5. Discuss the methodology employed in measuring the effectiveness of the
program/agency.
BUDGET
DOLLAR AMOUNT REQUESTED FROM CITY
TOTAL PROGRAM/AGENCY BUDGET
CITY AMOUNT AS % OF TOTAL BUDGET %
% OF TOTAL BUDGET FOR OVERHEAD
AND ADMINISTRATION COSTS %
6. List specific secured and anticipated sources of contributions available to the
applicant.
SECURED (S)
OR
SOURCE AMOUNT ANTICIPATED (A1
•
7. List in-kind items requested from the City.
-2-
Describe use of all in-kind contributions, and include estimated value of each in-
kind contribution.
9. a. Describe use of volunteers.
b. Describe how the use of volunteers impacts your budget.
0 COMMUNITY NEED
10. a. Explain the community need for the proposed service.
b. Discuss possible alternative sources for those services available within the
community.
c. Describe why those alternative services are not fulfilling the current needs.
•
-3-
0 11. Describe how Brooklyn Center benefits from the services provided.
12. State the total numbers of people from all communities who participate or receive
direct benefits, and describe how these numbers were determined.
PROJECTED TOTAL
TO BE SERVED
NEXT YEAR
TOTAL SERVED
LAST YEAR
•
13. State the numbers of residents from Brooklyn Center only who are served, and
describe how these numbers were determined.
TOTAL SERVED
LAST YEAR
•
ORGANIZATION NEED
PROJECTED TOTAL
TO BE SERVED
NEXT YEAR
14. What would be the consequences to your program/agency of not receiving the
amount requested?
-4-
Include the following supporting documentation that must accompany this application. If
any item is not enclosed, please explain why not.
1. Financial statement for the preceding fiscal year.
2. Proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year.
3. Data substantiating the need for this service in Brooklyn Center.
4. Proof of nonprofit status.
5. List of current Board of Directors.
6. Job descriptions and resumes of key personnel.
7. Statistical or other data measuring effectiveness of the program/agency.
Signature
•
•
Title
Date
-5-