HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993 05-03 FCA• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
MAY 3, 1993
7:00 p.m.
COUNCIL WORK SESSION
JOINT MEETING WITH FINANCIAL COMMISSION
.
CST' HAI L V+OUNCM CHAIVII' > .
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Inner-Ring Suburban Community Funding Needs
4. Organizational Evaluation Process
5. Capital Improvement Program Process for 1993
6. 1994 Budget Calendar/Financial Commission Involvement
• Last year the Financial Commission expressed dissatisfaction with the way they presented
their recommendations and they wish to discuss alternative approaches.
7. Adjournment
0
DRAFT 3/5/93
BROOKLYN CENTER
• INNER-RING SUBURBAN COMMUNITY FUNDING NEEDS
Inner-ring suburbs in this metropolitan area in the decade of the '80s and now on into the
'90s are beset by major urban problems such as: drug and crime activity increases;
deteriorating housing (both single-family and apartment); aging municipal infrastructure; and
aging commercial and industrial areas with declining property values. In Minnesota, most
of these cities are classified as cities of the second class and do not have available to them
the programs, laws, and funding sources which are available to Minnesota cities of the first
class (Duluth, St. Paul, and Minneapolis). These communities are entering into the decade
of the '90s without the legal tools and funding mechanisms to address the major problems
they face.
• Brooklyn Center, specifically, has a significant apartment problem. The tax law changes of
1986 affected their economic viability, most units are 30 years or older, and reduced
numbers of renters has produced a surplus of rental apartment units in Brooklyn Center and
other inner-ring suburbs. Our long-range goal should be to reduce the number of rental
apartments in the next ten to fifteen years by ten to fifteen percent (approximately the same
perecentage as our apartment vacancy rate over the last three years). Brooklyn Center
seeks funding sources which could assist in implementation of the following approaches to
achieve these rental apartment reduction goals: 1) by purchasing and razing those
apartment units which are not economically feasible to rehabilitate; 2) rehabilitation of some
units to such uses as senior and/or handicap housing; and 3) conversion of some units to
• co-op or condo status. Currently, Brooklyn Center needs an annual consistent source of
funding to accomplish this goal.
0 To address the need for commercial/industrial redevelopment, Brooklyn Center will need
a mechanism for assisting redevelopment in such a fashion as to make redevelopment
property competitive with open land in the outer-ring suburbs. This can be accomplished
by modifying the existing Tax Increment Financing legislation or some other mechanism
which will allow redevelopment to be competitive with open land development. We need
these modifications to address such rehabilitation needs as: deteriorated neighborhood
shopping centers (Northbrook, Humboldt Square), Brooklyn Boulevard Redevelopment, and
storm water treatment facilities in the Brookdale area.
Brooklyn Center has completed a market housing analysis and inventory and requires
additional funding source for our program to replace dilapidated single-family housing at
• a rate of eight to ten homes per year. Brooklyn Center needs a source of revenue annually
in the amount of approximately $400, 000 to $500,000 per year to achieve this goal. This
would allow Brooklyn Center to realistically address the deterioration of housing in its
neighborhoods.
Brooklyn Center needs sources of revenue to supplement special assessments, utility
revenues, and bonding sources to develop an ongoing utility, street, and neighborhood
revitalization program. Brooklyn Center's utilities and streets are entering into the stage
where major reconstruction is required. The only source of funding available at this time
is through assessments, property taxes, and utilities. Residents in some areas of the city
have already paid street and utility assessments previously. Because there are a number of
2
• low-income families in various neighborhoods in Brooklyn Center, there is a need for an
additional funding source to finance our assessment stabilization program at a rate of
approximately $200,000 per year. We are considering commencement of a twenty year utility
and street improvement program which would involve the replacement of approximately
four miles of utilities and streets annually. Because much of the cost burden falls on
assessments and property tax, additional sources of revenue such as a transportation utility
and local option sales tax funds should be considered as a potential alternate revenue
source.
In addition to the above needs, the operating departments of Brooklyn Center have
suggested needs in the following areas: additional police officers and personnel to address
• the crime and drugs issue; enhancement of Brooklyn Center's image by funding community
promotional and image enhancement programs; additional public works personnel in the
management information service area to develop computer capability in this department;
additional personnel to assist volunteers in general and specifically neighborhood advisory
committee coordination; intrasuburban transit such as a circulator/dial-a-ride system for the
Brooklyn Center area; and additional fire inspection services and by creating the position
of fire marshal.
Brooklyn Center has recently completed a total capital improvement program and it has
identified, or in the process of identifying, needs in the following areas: public safety
(police) building addition, a senior center (community center addition), various ADA
is
3
• improvements to Brooklyn Center community facilities, public works garage addition and
remodeling, remodeling and expansion of both Brooklyn Center fire stations, park building
rehabilitation program, park playground equipment replacement program, recreation facility
improvements in the Twin Lake area (possible additional land acquisition); and other
recreational facility needs.
•
•
4
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Paulson and City Councilmembe,Fs
FROM: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
DATE: March 31, 1993
SUBJECT: ORGANIZATIONAL EVALUATION PROCESS
Your Financial Commission has been charged with the responsibility of evaluating the
organization of the City of Brooklyn Center as to its effectiveness and report back to the
City Council. The Council at a previous work session had discussed various approaches and
questions they wish to be included in this process. I have developed the following outline
of a process we believe will address the City Council's interests. This process would cover
three areas: 1) evaluation of the potential for administrative structure reorganization; 2)
evaluation of the supervisory/management and other staffing levels (using comparative data
currently available); 3) a Service Evaluation Process.
AREAL ADMINISTRA77VE STRUCTURE REORGANIZATION
The Financial Commission would evaluate the potential for developing a future organization
plan which could be implemented over time to serve the changing needs of Brooklyn Center.
I have attached for your information a copy of the organizational chart of Brooklyn Center
just prior to the reorganization of the Community Development Department in the 1992
budget; a rough draft of an administrative organization which divides our organization into
functions, departments, and divisions (this chart identifies most all functions of the City); a
slightly modified organizational chart of the City of Brooklyn Center recognizing recent
changes and doing some minor modifications to the existing structure; and a copy of the City
of Bloomington organizational structure. The purpose of this evaluation would be to give
a guideline to future councils and staff as to what the organization should or could
eventually be and once it is decided, then as opportunities occur, you could make changes
and implement portions of the restructuring.
AREA 2. SUPER VISORYIAMNAGEMENTAND STAFFING LEVELS REVIEW
The second stage of this process would be to evaluate and compare staffing levels in all
portions of the organization: in the supervisory/management area, and in total personnel.
We propose to use existing, readily available information from the Stanton Survey and other
sources to give the Financial Commission and the Council an initial evaluation of
comparable staffing levels in similar metro area communities. If this data demonstrates a
need for further, more detailed analysis, then the recommendations could be made,
appropriations approved, and a more detailed analysis could be completed
. Memo to Council
Page 2
March 31, 1993
AREA 3. SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS
After your discussion at your last work session, the Council appeared to be leaning toward
processes which involve employees within the organization rather than outside time analysis
experts. We concur in this focus and propose a Service Evaluation Process structured
similar to the 1992 prioritization process. The Service Evaluation Process would have a
similar employee involvement committee system and would be directed at answering the
following questions:
1. What do we do well and why?
2. What do we do okay and why?
3. What needs improvement? How/why?
4. Are there other cities or businesses which do particular tasks better than we do?
S How/why?
5. How can we provide services better?
6. Are we doing the right things?
7. How should your department's performance be measured?
8. What opportunities are there for additional cooperation between departments?
9. In what ways can we encourage cooperation with other cities and governmental
units?
10. What ~otther departments do we interact with and in what ways?
l 1. tU e-S1ic1`vS I
If the City Council and Financial Commission can agree to this general outline, I believe
it is something which could give us a guide to use in future budget decisions and in general
overall policy discussions.
Attachment
0
a~ ~d
O)P
7A5>q?1' No, So3Y''•►n 'p,eCA, g~ y,t+ ss
lll~f W.. > to '0
y t~ a . o, Io~`► X07 0' ,y~'o sr~ +y°~ ~~'~'s► i
t r►"t ~o'1y 1.~^ ~o` 'yak yy c+~c'~'~9~t
'gel
oft
S yN ~ tats 1~ W~' ~ ~ y ~ .,o t PAY, •
I c.. ,s y
Pts81,~c sf =9`a~ fit l'r'g~q loll
SNotss~wwo'3 sW+V7yoy} NV:O1...
l' Swv79vyt s~ti+ttd
r►ot,;,M~y~~j to vvyt or1 SNayo~+H~
I f r ~ 1'~NnQ~ j.d.17 ~ lv 0 r.LV7.Lg i tlttW Qld
\ r'9rl~.tts spin co *114 >VOID
44" it'd 4
~~c1 y ysMo ~t d
910.) 't
K 9~a ~1 i a s~ s
ivic
.t.1.P fl,,•+s~+ wY:~ i1N1'tRrg ~.~+YtsA
~,Q ~j~ NNW t°- s6,. t sorr~~ 't }.yns dayl -
tf y a .c a wsrcoosv y, N~ 7► t+ d ,y w 0 d
Y-q-L(v9-') sof ovs .~vgl+Iyl1Y '1~MNos'y~d
9Aovs
v 0 It 40
v 1.4Y st N10 V
~t1~1 ~s N
~LEC.i.ORATE
Adv►so rV
Corr nrnlss►ons
~C11 1, COUNCIL
rct.,as►ng
Person ns
_ nager gtect S
y CItY M c►erK License
ev Cit-/
City Attorn - ,
N P~~~;ent
nclal pep
r unity ~ services
1 Comm n.tent \ ►
t
\ epartre'nen ` eVe►oP~
P~b11C D ~
$eNices
4 _ & AU~9
inspections
S S,nltary sevJer utility
1~ Assessln9 gulling
Govt gid9s ,
►neer►ng
gng A1NRA r r
Licluo norm sewer cep ~ ntng
~ s ores
L. - qStr eet Mntzo
ester peXst `
e RtsnKnt
ParK Mntc ► EF31'iC Mg J
E Sere tees t
"IS
r
I
'cre
1F-epartroenationt
R creation
Progra
munity~"
center
Golf
course
i
• . •
People of Bloomington
H Mayor and City Council
I
Health Advisory Board
Legal
L
Administrative
Services
City Clerk
Finance
Audit
information
Systems
Assessing
Support Services
Police
Operations
Support Division
City Manager
I''
Fire
. 111~ I
Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Port Authority
CATV Advisory Commission
Traffic and Transportation Advisory Commission
Senior Citizen Advisory Commission
Community
Development
Merit Board
Personnel
Community
Services
Health
_
Parks and
Recreation
Human
Services
CAN
Recreation
Facilities
CD Block Grant
t<
Management
Public Works
Engineering
Traffic
Maintenance
Equipment
Utilities
9300 A 4AQ
0 0 0
ORGANIZATION CHART COUNCIL-MANAGER PLAN
City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
ADVISORY
CHARTER COMMISSION
Various Ad Hoc Committees
ELECTORATE / (appointed by district court)
i ADVISORY
CITY ATTORNEY
Housing Commission
l
i ADVISORY
CITY COUNCIL
Human Rights & Resources Commission PERSONNEL COORDINATOR
ADVISORY
EDA COORDINATOR
Parks & Recreation Commission
CITY MANAGER
ADVISORY
Planning Commission
H CITY CLERK
DIRECTOR \ EARLE
-
Emergency BROWN
Prepared- HERITAGE
I ness CENTER
~OIRECTOR~ ~DIRECTOR~ yDIRECTOO
CHIEF //DIRECTOR~~ ~DIRECTOR
CHIEF MANAGER ASSESSOR
Planning of Finance
and Recreation Department
of Volunteer Public
Police Environ- Fire Liquor Works Tax
Inspection Cit
Department TreaI &er
mental Stores Assessment
Department Health Department Department Department
t
R
I
% q-- ~ _
~
ecrea
ion
Golf Programs
.
Park Government Public
Course
Maintenance Buildings Engineering Street Utilities
Centerbrook Community
Division Division Division Division Division
Center
• MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sharon Knutson, Administrative Assistant/Deputy City Clerk
DATE: April 2, 1993
SUBJECT: COMPOSITION OF COMMISSIONS
•
Subdivision 5 of the enabling resolutions for the Brooklyn Center advisory
commissions sets the size of membership of the commissions. Following is the
current composition for each of the commissions:
DRUG
AWARENESS Chair plus eight (8) members.
FINANCIAL Chair plus six (6) members.
HOUSING Chair plus eight (8) members.
HUMAN RIGHTS
& RESOURCES Chair plus six (6) members.
PARK &
RECREATION Chair plus six (6) members.
PLANNING Chair plus six (6) members.
0
•
CITY
OF
BROOKLYN
CENTER
6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY
BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430
TELEPHONE: 569-3300
FAX: 569-3494
EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE
911
•
March 22, 1993
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Paulson
Council Members N
FROM: Diane Spector, Public Works Coordinato O"
SUBJ: Capital Improvement Program Process for 1993
Enclosed are two items. The first is a revised version of the Capital Improvement Process (CIP) for
1993, reflecting your suggestions from March 15's work session. Specifically, I have added step 3,
where staff recommendations are to be reviewed by the Council in May, prior to going to the
Commissions for review and input. You may at that time provide direction, if you wish, to the
Commissions - perhaps suggesting a theme or a focus.
The second enclosure is an excerpt from the CIP of projects listed for consideration in 1993, 1994,
and 1995, with a summary for 1996-2000. A more detailed version of this enclosure is reproduced in
the 1993 budget book; it is the final section, on green paper.
If you have any suggestions regarding the CIP process, please let me know as soon as possible, and I
will incorporate them into the process. I anticipate that staff review of capital needs will begin by
the end of March.
Please feel free to discuss any aspect of the CIP - the process, the summary tables, the individual
projects - with me at any time. I'd especially like to know if there are additional summaries or
displays which you think would be helpful, or if there are other category breakdowns you'd like to
see.
Thank you for your time.
• cc: G. G. Splinter
Sy Knapp
,see~u,~uan e
~~~~~1.0b
Revised
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROCESS: 1993
Because many CIP initiatives are funded by the General Fund Budget, this process must coincide with
the budget process
Staff reviews needs and funding availability during March/April
Engineering, Public Utilities, Streets: Water, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Streets
Engineering, Building Maintenance, Fire: Government Buildings
Park Maintenance, Recreation: Parks
Streets, Parks, PU, Police, Fire: Vehicles
Data Processing Committee: Data Processing
Heritage Center: ?
ADA Compliance: ADA Compliance Committee
2. Staff recommendations are reviewed and prioritized at a Department Head meeting around the
third week of April. Additions or changes are suggested for staff review and cost analysis
3. Staff recommendations are forwarded to the City Council at the first meeting in May as a
discussion item. PURPOSE: Review staff recommendations, make suggestions, and establish
a direction for Commission and staff
4. Informational meeting of Commissions in May (Park & Rec, Financial, Water Mgmt, other?)
with staff where this is the only item on the agenda. PURPOSE: To review (1) history and
background; (2) where staff sees needs and priorities; (3) what are existing sources of
funding; and (4) what are possible other sources of funding
5. Commission working session(s) PURPOSE: (1) Review staff recommendations; (2) Discuss
process to evaluate any new needs - e.g., rely solely on Commission's expertise, have
neighborhood or general meeting, send surveys or questionnaires; (3) Implement process; (4)
Staff to provide support in estimating costs, etc.; (5) Prioritize needs and assign target dates;
(6) Evaluate all in light of funding constraints; (7) Make final recommendations
6. Commissions make preliminary recommendations in June/July for inclusion in departmental
budget requests
7. Staff compiles Commission recommendations into draft CIP report by end of July
Council work session in August PURPOSE: (1) Review Commission's processes; (2) Review
recommendations and priorities; (3) Review funding plan; (4) Discussion; (5) Suggest
modifications
9. Staff provides additional information, cost estimates, etc.
10. Public hearing or meeting to comment on proposed plan
11. Council approves CIP in September
eAeng\cip\process
0 0 0
AS PROPOSED
TABLE A - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Water Utility Capital Improvements
Italics indicates moved to 1993
12-Mar-93 1993 1 94l.. y 995 1996-'2000 FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURES:
All Water Utility
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Well 10 to Well 6
0
Shingle Creek Pkwy to Brooklyn Blvd (69th Ave Project)
0
Well 6 to Shingle Creek Pkwy
300,000
00
0
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
Construct Well #10
2 MG Reservoir & Pumping Station
3,300,000
0
Construct Well #11
1,000,000
MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS
New Electric Controls at Wells 5, 6, 7
90,000
0
Loop 2" Water Main at Lawrence Circle
15,000
0
WATER TOWERS
Paint Tower #1
166,000
Paint Tower #2
150,000
0
Paint Tower #3
158,000
MISCELLANEOUS
Water Sample Lab Update
25,000
Routine Well Maintenance
50,000
50,000
50,000
250,000
Cathodic Protection
25,000
25,000
25,000
125,000
SCADA System Update
50,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
$3,715,000
$165,0001
$225,000
$1,749,000
FUND SOURCES:
Water Utility
3,715,000
165,000
225,000
1,749,000
TOTAL
$3,715,000
$165,0001
$225,000
$1,749,000
0 . i
AS PROPOSED
TABLE B - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Sanitary Sewer Utility Capital Improvements
Italics indicates moved to 1993
12-Mar-93 < .1993 ?994! ..1....1995 1996-20;Qp FUa1 R SOU.RGE
EXPENDITURES:
LIFT STATIONS
Replace Lift Station #2
Lift #1 Rehab, Replace Forcemain
Intrac/Motorola Update
Replace Lifts 8 & 9
SEWER REPLACEMENT:
69th Avenue, Brooklyn Blvd to Drew
53rd Avenue (By Brookdale 10 Apts)
James Avenue (55th to the South)
69th Avenue to Lift Station #1
194/694 Repair
Replace Sewer Line at Brookdale
MISCELLANEOUS
Annual Televising Program
1/1 Remediation Program
Mobile Emergency Pump
FUND SOURCES:
Sanitary Sewer Utility
All San Sewer Utility
0
0
600,000 0
90,000 0
220,000
0
32,000 0
70,000 0
250,000 750,000 0
0
8,000
8,000
8,000
40,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
100,000
30,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $968,000
$130,0001
$778.000
$360,000
968,000
130,000
778,000
360,000
TOTAL $968,000
$130,0001
$778,000
$360,000
0
AS PROPOSED
TABLE C - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Storm Drainage Utility Capital Improvements
Italics indicates moved to 1993
12-Mar-93 ! . 1993 1; :1994 ,1 VOS 110.96--.2000 l FUND SOURCE
All Storm Drainage
EXPENDITURES: Utility
Repair or Replace Defective Sections of System 100,000 100,000 100,000
Watershed Commission Capital Improvements
Miscellaneous improvements 25,000 25,000 25,000
Water Quality Improvement Projects 50,000 100,000 100,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1 $175,0001 $225,0001 $225,0001
FUND SOURCES:
Storm Drainage Utility
175,000 225,000 225,000
TOTAL 1 $175,0001 $225,0001 $225,0001
500,000
100,000
125,000
500,000
$1,225,0001
1,225,000
$1,225,0001
•
IP 0
AS PROP SED
TABLE D - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Sidewalk and Trail Improvements
Italics indicates moved to 1993
12-Mar-93 1'993 1994' . 1995 1995-2000 FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURES:
OFF-STREET TRAIL:
Trail Subsidence Correction Behind Library
Humboldt Square Trail
53rd Avenue, Upton to Shingle Creek
Brookdale Center Trail
69th Avenue, Brooklyn Blvd to Shingle Creek Parkway
Twin Lake/Preserve Trail
Hennepin Parks' Riverridge Trail
NSP Easement Trail, Knox to Dupont
Willow Lane, 1694 to West River Road
Palmer Lake Dual Trail
69th Avenue, Shingle Creek Parkway to TH252
ON-STREET TRAIL:
Marking and Signage
SIDEWALK:
Northway Drive
73rd Avenue, Humboldt to TH 252
55th Avenue, Lions Park to Logan
73rd Avenue, Humboldt to Penn
71 st/72nd Avenues, Noble to Halifax
0 Local State Aid
0 Local State Aid
0 Local State Aid
300,000 0 Local State Aid
0 Local State Aid
94,000
50,000 0
50,000 0
25,000 0
71,000
90,000
10,000 10,000 10,000
18,000
35,000
30,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $118,000 $110,000 $310,000
FUND SOURCES:
State Aid - Local Accounts #2611 /#2600 118,000 60,000 310,000
General Fund
Other Governments 0 50,000 0
TOTAL $118,000 $110,000 $310,000
Local State Aid
Hennepin County
Local State Aid
Local State Aid
Local State Aid
Local State Aid
50,000 Local State Aid
0
Local State Aid
0
Local State Aid
21,000
Local State Aid
0
Local State Aid
27,000
Local State Aid
$353,000
353,000
$353,000
•
AS PROPED •
TABLE E - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Park Improvements
Italics indicates moved to 1993
12-Mar-931:' . 1 J93 I 1994 1!995 1996 :21 ~01 I FUND SQURCE
EXPENDITURES:
Playground Equipment Replacement: 2 per Year*
63,000
25,000
25,000
125,000 General Fund
Replace 6 Shelter Buildings
-r
360,000 GO Park Bonds
Lighting- Grandview Baseball
100,000 GO Park Bonds
Acquisition of New Park Land
200,000 GO Park Bonds
Twin Lake/Preserve/Kylawn Improvements
400,000 GO Park Bonds
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
$63,0001
$25,0001
$25,0001
$1,185,0001
FUND SOURCES:
Capital Projects Fund
0
0
0
0
General Fund
63,000
25,000
25,000
125,000
GO Bonds
0
0
0
1,060,000
TOTAL
$63,0001
$25,0001
$25,0001
$1,185,0001
* 1993 budget = $63,000. All items pending comprehensive park and
playground needs study.
•
AS PRAISED
TABLE F - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Public Building Improvements
Italics indicates moved to 1993
12-Mar-93 199 ; ' 1994 f995 > I'1998 ~2QQa FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURES:
CITY HALL
City Office Improvements
COMMUNITY CENTER
Senior Center/Elevator
Water Slide
CITY GARAGE IMPROVEMENTS
FIRE STATIONS
East Station
West Station
1,500,000
1,000,000
250,000
610,000
330,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,690,000
0
1/2 GO Bonds, 1/2 Capital
Projects Fund
0
1/2 GO Bonds, 1/2 Capital
Projects Fund
0
Capital Projects Fund
450,000
1/4Water,'/+ Sewer
Utilities, 1/z Capital Projects
0
'/2 GO Bonds, % Capital
0
Projects Fund
$01 $01 $450,000
FUND SOURCES:
Capital Projects
Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility
GO Bonds
1,870,000
0
0
225,000
50,000
0
0
112,500
50,000
0
0
112,500
1,720,000
0
0
0
TOTAL $3,690,000
$01
$01
$450,000
i •
•
AS PROPOSED
TABLE G - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements
Italics indicates moved to '93/4
12-Mar-93 1993 x'994 1995 1996-2000 G FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURES:
SEALCOATING
140,000 140,000 140,000 700,000 General Fund
SIGNALS
69th and France Avenues 0 MSA- Regular #2613
Brooklyn Blvd & TH100 Northbound Ramp/Lilac Dr 150,000 0 Local State Aid
Brooklyn Blvd & 51stAvenue 150,000 0 Local State Aid
Summit & Earle Brown W (Target Entrance) 125,000 0 Special Assessments
Shingle Creek Pkwy and Parkway Circle 125,000 0 Special Assessments
REGULAR MSA ACCOUNT #2613 STREET PROJECTS
69th Avenue, Brooklvn Blvd to Shingle Creek Pkwv
0
0
MSA- Regular #2613
MSA- Regular #2613
0
MSA- Local #2611/#2600
MSA-Local #2611/#2600
0
MSA-Bonds #2612
MSA-Bonds #2612
0
Water Utility
Water Utility
0
Sanitary Sewer Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility
0
Storm Drainage Utility
Storm Drainage Utility
0
Special Assessments
Special Assessments
57th Avenue. Logan to Lvndale
1,100,000
000
404
0
0
MSA- Regular #2613
MSA- Regular #2613
,
000
126
0
MSA- Local #2611/#2600
MSA- Local #2611/#2600
,
50,000
0
Water Utility
Water Utility
000
4
0
Sanitary Sewer Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility
,
000
326
0
Storm Drainage Utility
Storm Drainage Utility
,
000
190
0
Hennepin Countv
Henneoin Countv
,
• •
AS PROPOSED
TABLE G - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements
•
Italics indicates moved to '93/4
12-Mar-93 1993 1994 1995 1996-2000 FUNQ;,SOURCE
(State Aid Street Projects, con't)
63rd Avenue, W City Limits to Brooklvn Blvd
1,002,000
0
MSA-Regular #2613
461,000
0
MSA- Regular #2613
MSA-Local #2611/#2600
156,000
0
MSA- Local #2611/#2600
Water Utility
95,000
0
Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility
5,000
0
Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility
135,000
0
Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments
150,000
0
Special Assessments
Noble Avenue. Brooklvn Blvd to N Citv Limits
87,000
0
MSA-Regular #2613
51,000
0
MSA- Regular #2613
MSA- Local #2611/#2600
(4,000)
0
MSA- Local #2611/#2600
Water Utility
13,000
0
Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility
1,000
0
Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility
0
0
Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments
26,000
0
Special Assessments
69th Avenue, Shinqle Creek Pkwv to Oliver & Bridqe
1,197,000
0
MSA-Regular #2613
1,015,000
0
MSA-Regular #2613
MSA-Local #2611/#2600
(2,000)
0
MSA-Local #2611/#2600
Water Utility
32,000
0
Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility
2,000
0
Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility
45,000
0
Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments
105,000
0
Special Assessments
France Avenue. 69th to N City Limits
MSA- Regular #2613
MSA-Local #2611/#2600
Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments
349,000
188,000
MSA- Regular #2613
18,000
MSA-Local #2611/#2600
31,000
Water Utility
2,000
Sanitary Sewer Utility
45,000
Storm Drainage Utility
65,000
Special Assessments
• •
AS PROPOSED
TABLE G - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements
Italics indicates moved to '93/4
•
12-Mar-93 1993 994. 1995.:..:. 1995=2U0t
_ : ..FUND >SO!URCE=
(State Aid Street Projects, con't)
53rd Avenue, France to 55th Avenue
403,000
MSA- Regular #2613
196,000
MSA- Regular #2613
MSA-Local #2611/#2600
51,000
MSA-Local #2611/#2600
Water Utility
36,000
Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility
2,000
Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility
51,000
Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments
67,000
Special Assessments
Brooklvn Boulevard At Lilac Drive
571,000
MSA- Regular #2613
474,000
MSA- Regular #2613
MSA-Local #2611/#2600
23,000
MSA-Local #2611/#2600
Water Utility
17,000
Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility
1,000
Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility
24,000
Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments
32,000
Special Assessments
51stAvenue, Brookivn Blvd to Xerxes
71,000
MSA- Regular #2613
40,000
MSA- Regular #2613
MSA-Local #2611/#2600
8,000
MSA-Local #2611/#2600
Water Utility
5,000
Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility
1,000
Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility
8,000
Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments
9,000
Special Assessments
69th Avenue. Oliver to Dupont
867,000
MSA-Regular #2613
544,000
MSA-Regular #2613
MSA-Local #2611/#2600
63,000
MSA- Local #2611/#2600
Water Utility
45,000
Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility
3,000
Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility
64,000
Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments
148,000
Special Assessments
0 0
AS PRAISED
TABLE G - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements
Italics indicates moved to '93/4
12-Mar-93
1;993.
> :194 y99a < y99S=2OQ
.FUND 'SOURCE
(State Aid Street Projects, con't)
Humboldt Avenue. 69th to N Citv Limits
423,000
MSA- Regular #2613
220,000
MSA-Regular #2613
MSA-Local #2611/#2600
45,000
MSA-Local #2611/#2600
Water Utility
31,000
Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility
2,000
Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility
45,000
Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments
80,000
Special Assessments
OTHER STREET PROJECTS
2/3 Bonds
Neighborhood Street Improvement Program
600,000
1,200,000 1,200,000 6,000,000
1/3 Special Assessments
LANDSCAPING
West River Road Streetscape
0
MSA-Local #2611
Co Rd 10 Streetscape
100,000
0
1/2 MSA-2600, 1/2 Special
Assessments
Xerxes Avenue Streetscape
70,000
0
MSA-Local #2600
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
$1,160,000
$3,829,000 $2,537,000 $12,068,000
FUND SOURCES:
MSA - Regular #2613
0
916,000
1,015,000
1,662,000
MSA - Local #2611/#2600
0
578,000
(2,000)
208,000
MSA - Local #2600
120,000
0
0
0
MSA - Bonds #2612
0
0
0
0
Water Utility
0
158,000
32,000
165,000
Sanitary Sewer Utility
0
10,000
2,000
11,000
Storm Drainage Utility
0
461,000
45,000
237,000
Special Assessments
498,000
762,000
501,000
2,381,000
Bonds
402,000
804,000
804,000
4,020,000
General Fund
140,000
140,000
140,000
700,000
Hennepin County
0
0
0
0
TOTAL $1,160,000
$3,829,000
$2,537,000
$9,384,000
*If a Transoortation Utili
tv is authorized by the Leaislature. it could be used to reolace some of the funding raised throtinh Chantar
0 •
AS PROPOSED
TABLE H - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Data Processing Equipment
Italics indicates moved to 1993
12-Mar-93....x.993 I Y 994 1X95 1996-2000 FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURES:
Network OR Distributed Site 20,000,
Annual Equipment 65,500 150,000 40,000
Remote Reading Water Meters 275,000 250,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $65,5001 $425,0001 $310,000
FUND SOURCES:
General Fund 58,000 108,000 60,000
Water Utility 7,500 275,000 250,000
Sanitary Sewer Utility
Other Funds 42,000
170,000
General Fund
100,000
General Fund, Other,
Water & Sewer Utilities
250,000
Water Utility
$520,000
270,000
250,000
0
0
•
TOTAL $65,5001 $425,0001 $310,000 $520,000
•
AS PROPOSED
TABLE I - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
City Vehicles
Italics indicates moved to 1993
12-Mar-93 1993 1994
y995:...199~ .2000 1=i1'ND SQURCE
(City vehicles, con't)
UNLICENSED
1 Ton Roller
Cat Grader
Cat Loader
Rubber Tired Roller
Backhoe
Snow Blower
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Vans
Pumpers
Autos
Ladder
POLICE
Autos
FUND SOURCES:
General Fund
Water Utility
Storm Drainage Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility
68,000
0 General Fund
0 General Fund
75,000 General Fund
r 0 General Fund
50,000 Water Utility
0 General Fund
375,000 General Fund
155,000 General Fund
0 General Fund
0 General Fund
56,000 56,000 56,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $325,250 $175,000 $366,000
220,250 165,000 106,000
35,000 5,000 0
65,000 0 130,000
5,000 5,000 130,000
280,000 General Fund
$1,506,000
1,251,500
77,250
150,000
27,250
TOTAL $325,250 $175,000 $366,000 $1,506,000
• CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
1994 BUDGET CALENDAR
May 10, 1993 Monday City Council discusses elements of
Capital Improvements Program (C.I.P.).
May 18, 1993 Tuesday Preliminary budget conference for City
Manager with city department and division
heads, 8:30 a.m., Council Chambers.
June 7, 1993 Monday City Council Town Meeting - 1994 Budget.
June 14, 1993 Monday Budget requests due from all departments
for submission to the Finance Director.
June 23, 1993 Wednesday Consolidated budget requests forwarded
from the Finance Director to the City
Manager.
June 24 through July 9 Manager consults as necessary with
individual department and division heads
as budget document is shaped.
June/July 1993 City Commissions make preliminary
recommendations on Capital Improvements
Program (C.I.P.) components.
• August 6, 1993 Friday Preliminary budget is delivered to the
City Council members.
August 1993 City Council holds work sessions to
review Capital Improvements Program.
August 19, 1993 Thursday County must notify City of the public
hearing dates selected by school
districts.
Sept 1, 1993 Department of Revenue is to certify Local
Government Aid amounts.
September 1993 City Council approves C.I.P.
Sept 9, 1993 Last day for adoption of the Preliminary
Budget and the Preliminary tax levy by
the City Council.
Sept 14, 1993 Certify preliminary budget and
preliminary tax levy to the County. City
must also inform the County of City
budget public hearing dates.
• Nov 10 - Nov 23, 1993 County must mail individual property tax
notices to each property owner.
•
•
Nov 29 - Dec 20, 1993 Public hearings on the budget to be held.
Exact dates will be determined after
school districts set their hearings.
December 7, 1993 Tuesday All counties to hold budget public
hearings.
December 20, 1993 Monday Last day for the adoption of the final
budget by the City Council.
December 27, 1993 Monday Last day to certify final tax levy and
final budget to the County.
ALL DATES AFTER AUGUST 6 ARE TENTATIVE UNTIL THE LEGISLATIVE
SESSION HAS ENDED.
40