Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007 04-26 PCP PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER APRIL 26, 2007 STUDY SESSION 1. Call to Order: 7:00 p.m. 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes April 12, 2007 4. Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 5. Seth Oliver (Brooklyn Hotel Partners, LLC) 2007 -008 Request for Planned Unit Development Amendment and development plan approval of the first phase of a two building hotel complex consisting of an eight story, 175 room hotel, 100 seat restaurant and an enclosed connection to the Earle Brown Heritage Center. 6. Brooklyn Center Church of the Nazarene 2007 -009 Request for Special Use Permit and Site and Building Plan approval for a three phase church addition and parking lot expansion at 501 73 Avenue North. 7. Other Business 8. Adjournment Application Filed on 3 -29 -07 City Council Action Should Be Taken By 5 -28 -07 (60 Days) Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 2007 -008 Applicant: Seth Oliver (Brooklyn Hotel Partners, LLC) Location: 6300 Earle Brown Drive Request: Planned Unit Development Amendment The applicant, Brian Morse of SJA Architects representing Seth Oliver (Brooklyn Hotel Partners, LLC) is seeking a Planned Unit Development Amendment and development plan approval for the first phase of a two building hotel complex consisting of an eight story, 175 room hotel and 100 seat restaurant with an enclosed connection to the Earle Brown Heritage Center on a vacant 6.2 acre site addressed as 6300 Earle Brown Drive. The property in question is zoned PUD /CIA (Planned Unit Development/Service- Office, no height limit) and is located on the east side of the west leg of Earle Brown Drive adjacent to the Earle Brown Heritage Center. It is bounded on the west and north by Earle Brown Drive with a six story office building and I -94 right of way on the opposite side of the street; on the east by the Earle Brown Heritage Center which is zoned C -2 (Commerce); and on the south by a high rise office building (City County Federal Credit Union) zoned CIA. A Planned Unit Development rezoning from CIA to PUD /CIA and development plan approval for a four and seven story, 250 room hotel with a 100 seat restaurant and a 32,000 sq. ft. water park including an enclosed walkway connection to the Earle Brown Heritage Center was approved for this same site by the City Council under City Council Resolution No. 2005 -97 on June 27, 2005. Attached for the Commission's review is a copy of the resolution containing various findings, considerations and conditions of approval for that proposal. Transient lodging and associated uses are permitted uses in the CIA zoning district. The site in question is also in the city's CC (Central Commerce Overlay District) which lists allowable and prohibited uses in the Overlay district. Transient lodging, eating establishments including eating establishments offering live entertainment and recreation and amusement places are uses also allowed in the Overlay district. The applicant is no longer pursuing the hotel/water park proposal and is now seeking a PUD amendment to allow a two building hotel complex with one building containing 175 hotel rooms and a 100 seat restaurant and the second building with 75 rooms. The development plan approval comprehends the first phase only that being an eight story, 175 room hotel and restaurant including an enclosed connection to the Earle Brown Heritage Center. They are also seeking concept approval for the second phase, a future 75 room hotel. Final approval for the second phase will require an amendment to this proposed Planned Unit Development. 4 -26 -07 Page 1 As the Commission is aware, the PUD process involves a rezoning of land to the PUD designation followed by an alpha numeric designation of the underlying zoning district. This underlying zoning district provides the regulations governing uses and structures within the Planned Unit Development. The rules and regulations governing that district (in this case CIA) would apply to the development proposal unless the city were to determine that another standard or use would be appropriate given mitigating circumstances that are off set by the plans submitted by the developer. One of the purposes of the PUD district is to give the City Council the needed flexibility in addressing development and redevelopment problems. Regulations governing uses and structures may be modified by conditions ultimately imposed by the City Council on the development plans. The PUD process involves a rezoning of land, therefore, is subject to meeting the city's Rezoning Evaluation Policy and Review Guidelines that are contained in Section 35 -208 of the city's zoning ordinance. Also, proposals must be consistent with Section 35 -355 of the city's zoning ordinance which addresses Planned Unit Developments. Attached for the Commission's review are copies of Section 35 -208 and 35 -355 of the city's zoning ordinance. As mentioned previously, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the overall PUD for this area of the city. That resolution contained the various findings and considerations necessary for approving the PUD. These findings and considerations were made given the applicant's use and this amendment is to acknowledge the building details and location of an amended proposal within the PUD zoning district. Approval of this Planned Unit Development amendment should acknowledge compatibility with the Policies and Review Guidelines of the previously mentioned Section 35 -208 and also the provisions of Section 35 -355 of the zoning ordinance. It is believed that the proposed amendment submitted by the applicant is in keeping with the findings and considerations associated with the original approval. The proposed amendment can be considered consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses in this area. The development plan amendment being submitted will, like the original approval, seek modifications to ordinance standards to allow no 15 ft. green strip along the Earle Brown Drive street right of way. No other modifications from the underlying zoning requirements are being sought by the applicant with this Planned Unit Development. It is believed that the proposed use of the property will be, as shown in the site and building plan portion of this report, consistent and compatible with the immediate area surrounding the property as well as uses in the general vicinity. This proposed amendment appears to be a good use of the property in the context of overall development in this area and will be a good long range use and can be considered to be in the best interest of the community. SITE AND BUILDING PLAN PROPOSAL The proposed PUD amendment, as mentioned previously, is for a two building hotel complex with the first building being an eight story, 175 room hotel with a 100 seat restaurant having an enclosed connection to the Earle Brown Heritage Center. The second building would be a 75 room hotel (Phase II). Final approval for the second phase will require an amendment to this proposed Planned Unit Development. A modification to the CIA requirements being proposed by the applicant would be allowed to have no 15 ft. green strip along the Earle Brown Drive Page 2 street right of way. This modification is proposed to make a more efficient use of the site which is slightly smaller than necessary to accommodate parking and landscaping requirements. The applicant has proposed to offset or mitigate the negative aspects of the lack of green strip by providing a 3 %2 to 4 ft. high decorative fence of masonry piers and coated polymer fencing similar to other screening/fencing material used where green strips in other Planned Unit Developments have been allowed to be less than 15 ft. This was also authorized under the original Planned Unit Development. It is believed that this treatment along with the landscape plan should provide an appropriate buffer to offset the lack of 15 ft. green strip in this area. ACCESS/PARKING Access to this site will be at five locations along Earle Brown Drive. Two of the access points are shared accesses, one with the City County Federal building to the south and the other to the Earle Brown Heritage Center to the east. Two of the non shared accesses line up with the access drives across Earle Brown Drive serving the office building and the third is directly to the north of the hotel building with no close access on the opposite side of Earle Brown Drive. A total of 325 parking spaces are required for the two hotels, one of which contains a 100 seat restaurant. The zoning ordinance requires one parking space for every hotel room and one space for each employee on any one shift and one parking space for every two restaurant seats and every two employees in the restaurant operation. A total of at least 325 parking spaces would be required to accommodate the two phase development. The first phase, however, would have a parking requirement of 250 spaces. A total of 295 parking spaces are to be constructed under the first phase leaving only 45 parking spaces remaining for the 75 room second phase development. It is also planned that the second phase hotel site would be divided from this property through the platting process leaving, in that case, a deficiency on the first phase hotel site. These discrepancies must be addressed appropriately prior to recommending approval of this Planned Unit Development. It is anticipated that a formal cross parking agreement and parking dedication with the Earle Brown Heritage Center will be accomplished at the time the property is replatted. GRADING/DRAINAGE/UTILITIES The applicant has provided preliminary grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans which are being reviewed by the Director of Public Works /City Engineer. His written comments with respect to this proposal will be attached with this information sheet. This site is approximately 6.2 acres in area and will be required to have a formal Watershed Management Commission review. Storm sewer will be provided throughout the site to collect storm water to be conveyed to an expanded pond on the site. This pond serves this site, the City County Federal building site and the Earle Brown Heritage Center. Sanitary sewer and water are available within Earle Brown Drive right of way and sewer and water connections are to be made to the building at various locations indicated on the utility plan. Page 3 A traffic impact study for the then proposed hotel/water park was completed by Benshoff and Associates, Inc. at the time of the original Planned Unit Development. That study indicated that the existing facilities would be able to adequately accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed development. It is not anticipated that this project would generate a greater amount of traffic than the proposed hotel, restaurant and water park proposal and, therefore, existing facilities should be able to adequately accommodate the traffic generated by this amended proposal. B612 curb and gutter is required around all parking and driving areas to assist with drainage on the site. The City Engineer is requesting a dedication of a drainage and utility easement over all portions of the expanded storm water detention pond with the hotel property. LANDSCAPING The applicant has submitted a landscape plan in response to the landscape point system utilized by the Planning Commission to evaluate such plans. This 6.2 acre site requires 412 landscape points. The landscape plan provided shows a total of 453 landscape points divided between the two potential sites. The site proposed for the eight story Embassy Suites and restaurant contains 284 points while the future hotel site contains 169 points. The total plan calls for 13 Redmond Linden primarily in the island areas of the parking lot for the two buildings and also in the large island area by the front entrance to the building. Twenty coniferous trees such as Black Hills Spruce and Balsam Fir are provided in various locations around the two buildings. Sixty nine decorative trees including Japanese Tree Lilac, Columnar Crab Apple and Clump River Birch are also scattered throughout the site. The Columnar Crab Apple line the parking lot delineators to the west of the Embassy Suites Hotel and are located on the north side of the Embassy Suite and the north side of the proposed future hotel building. Japanese Tree Lilac are to the east of the Embassy Suites and the east of the new proposed hotel while the Clump River Birch are primarily located in island areas to the west of the buildings. Over 102 points for shrubs are provided including compact American Compact Vibernum, Mount Airy Fothergilla, Russian Cypress, Green Mound Alpine Currant, and Rose Pavement Foxi. As noted previously, a decorative fence of 3 %Z to 4 ft. in height made up of brick piers and coated polymer fence will be provided all along the north and west where the green strip is less than 15 A. in width. This fence must be located within the property line and not wander into the public right of way. BUILDING The applicant has submitted building elevations of the proposed Embassy Suites, eight story building. The building exterior will be primarily brick of three colors in varying shades of brown. An EIFS wall system will be provided around the top portion of the building as well as around the first floor area containing the entrance, restaurant, lobby and pool areas. The entrance to the building will be on the south side with a canopy extending out over a temporary parking, pick up and drop off area. Page 4 LIGHTING /TRASH The applicant has not submitted a lighting plan indicating foot candles for lighting proposed for the site. Section 35 -712 of the City Ordinances requires that all exterior lighting be provided with lenses, reflectors or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the property. Illumination is not permitted at an intensity level greater than 10 foot candles measured at property lines abutting street right of way or non residential property. No glare is allowed to emanate from or be visible beyond the boundaries of the illuminated premises. It is not anticipated that lighting should be a problem with respect to this plan. The applicant should, however, provide an appropriate lighting plan for review prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. No trash container area is shown on the site plan as well. There is a service road leading to the west side of the Embassy Suites building where it is assumed that trash pick up and deliveries to the site will be accomplished. The applicant should verify that trash will be contained wholly within the building and that there is no need for a screening enclosed area for trash. If this assumption is incorrect, the plan should be modified to show the location of an appropriate trash container. PROCEDURE As pointed out previously, this proposal is an amendment to the Planned Unit Development approval granted on June 27, 2005 for a then 250 room hotel, 100 seat restaurant, water park and connection to the Earle Brown Heritage Center. As a Planned Unit Development amendment, the proposal is required to follow the procedures followed for the original Planned Unit Development. This requires a public hearing, which has been scheduled. Notices of the Planning Commission's consideration have been sent and notices also have been published in the Brooklyn Center Sun/Post. All in all, we believe the plan is consistent with the original development plan approval and should be authorized as an amendment to allow a two phase development of a eight story, 175 room hotel, 100 seat restaurant and physical connection to the Earle Brown Heritage Center under Phase I and Phase II for future development of a hotel site. Development of Phase 11 will require an amendment to the Planned Unit Development approval. There are matters to be resolved such as acceptable parking arrangement for the property and submission of a photometric plan. Approval of this application should acknowledge the findings, considerations and conditions that are comparable to those made at the time the City Council approved the original Planned Unit Development. A draft Planning Commission resolution is offered for the Commission's consideration. This resolution outlines the Commission's consideration of the matter and also recommended considerations for approval. Page 5 MAI s RI FRE nM ei w PLANNING COMMISS ION APPLICATION NO. 200 E 7 008 ?°';�v :.Fad, PC D `R iF y, ...•`S'J;�. ��y{{�p a ,,i ha i c y HMTAW cmim r A CIA W :j.,•Y�� {�.J�' •NtAk�'�•.- i�`,�•.1`Z.t� Wes/ �,Q ^,+c�?L �t� i i •Mt :Y= '5:... y,�;l CI A A• .•��5112.. i K`.lyC/.. I j H:.iNEM CO. 0 1 CMTER C2 mi R7 01 MOWN ITRAL COMMERCE :R LA t DISTRICT (CC) N. C2 C2 YC2 LOCI Ma Output Page Page IofI d� h ttp: gl slgl sog/LQUI_ArcMSims?ServiceName =b_LOGI Ma_OV &CienV26o. 417200 City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community MEMORANDUM DATE: April 23, 2007 TO: Ron Warren, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Todd Blomstrom, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Preliminary Site Plan Review Planning Commission Applications 2007 -008 Embassy Suites Hotel Public Works Department staff reviewed the following preliminary documents submitted for review under Planning Commission Application 2007 -008 for the proposed Embassy Suites Hotel Development Site. Sheet C1.0: Topographic Survey, dated January 30, 2007 Sheet C2.0: Demolition Plan, dated March 26, 2007 Sheet C3.0: Grading and Erosion Control Plan, dated March 26, 2007 Sheet C4.0: Utility Plan, dated March 26, 2007 Sheet C5.0: Geometric Plan, dated March 26, 2007 Sheet C6.0: Civil Details, dated March 26, 2007 Sheet C7.0: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, dated March 26, 2007 The applicant is proposing to develop property consisting of Lot 1, Block 1, Brooklyn Farm Addition. This property is currently open vacant land adjacent to the Earle Brown Heritage Center. Public Works staff recommends that the following conditions of approval be adopted by the Planning Commission and City Council for Planning Commission Application 2007 -008. 1. EASEMENT DEDICATION Community Development staff have indicated that the proposed development site will be subdivided by recording of a subdivision plat. The proposed subdivision plat would provide two separate lots for the two proposed hotel sites. A preliminary plat has not been prepared at this time. The property owner shall dedicate a drainage and utility easement, 10 feet in width, along all property boundaries and dedicate a drainage and utility easement over all portions of the storm water detention pond within the hotel property. The drainage and utility easement documents shall be executed and recorded with Hennepin County prior to issuance of a building permit. 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 (763) 569 -3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569 -3300 FAX (763) 569 -3434 Page 1 of 4 FAX (763) 569 -3494 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org i 2. SITE LAYOUT The Geometric Plan provides a layout of the proposed site improvements. A total of five entrances are proposed for the site consisting of the common southern driveway entrance with the City- County Federal Credit Union Building, three new entrances along Earle Brown Drive, and the common northern driveway entrance with the Earle Brown Heritage Center. A. The proposed site layout shows parking areas adjacent to Earle Brown Drive with essentially no setback from the property boundary in many locations. Potions of the parking lot and curbing appear to encroach into the public street right -of -way. All curbing and paved surfaces for the proposed development site shall have a minimum of one -foot setback from the property boundary adjacent to the public street (excluding the driveway entrances). Parking lot encroachments into the public right -of -way shall be eliminated from the plans. B. Parking lot spaces and drive lane dimensions shall comply with the minimum design standards provided in City Ordinance Section 35 -702. C. The proposed driveway access points along Earle Brown Drive conflict with existing street lights located along the street boulevard. The Developer shall relocate the existing street light units and bases in accordance with City standards at the Developer's expense. Engineering plans for street light relocation work shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review. 2. PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES The proposed development site is currently served by public water supply and sanitary sewer within Earle Brown Drive. Water service is available from a 10 -inch diameter water main along the western portion of Earle Brown Drive and a 12 -inch diameter water main along the northern portion of Earle Brown Drive. A 12 -inch diameter sanitary sewer was installed along the western portion of Earle Brown Drive during the 2006 construction season. A. The total maximum peak discharge rate to the public sanitary sewer system from the site (including both hotel buildings) shall not exceed 425 gallons per minute under any circumstances. The applicant shall provide sanitary sewer peak discharge calculations for both buildings. These calculations shall be in written report form and certified by a licensed Professional Engineer. A building permit for the proposed development shall not be issued until sufficient evidence is provided regarding compliance with sanitary sewer peak discharge limitations. B. The applicant shall conduct fire flow testing of the water system along Earle Brown Drive in the presence of Public Utility staff. The applicant shall provide sufficient data to the City Building Official to document the extent of fire flow capacity for the proposed building. C. Sanitary sewer manholes shall be placed near the right -of -way along all sewer services serving the proposed restaurant or other central kitchen facilities. D. The sanitary sewer service extending from SSMH #1 shall be reduced to an 8 -inch diameter pipe to reflect the requirements of Item A above, unless the applicant submits supporting information showing the necessity for a 10 -inch diameter sewer service. Page 2 of 4 E. Fire and domestic water services shall be separated prior to entering the buildings. Domestic and fire services shall have separate exterior gate valves or PIVs to allow isolation of individual water service lines. F. Tracer wire and tracer wire access boxes shall be installed along the proposed sanitary sewer services in accordance with City standards. G. Utility service extensions shall meet City of Brooklyn Center design standards. The location and method of connection to the existing water and sanitary sewer mains shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer and Supervisor of Public Utilities. H. The proposed hydrant locations are subject to the approval of the City Fire Chief and Building Official. I. The Applicant shall be responsible for coordinating site development plans with Xcel Energy, CenterPoint Energy, Qwest Communications and other private utility companies. J. The applicant shall pay City and Metropolitan Council sanitary sewer connection charges and City water connection charges for the proposed building units. 3. TRAFFIC In 2005, the City hired a traffic consultant to perform a Traffic Impact Study for the proposed hotel development project. The Traffic Impact Study investigated the projected traffic volumes that would be generated from the proposed hotels. The study provided an analysis of the traffic operation within the intersection of Earle Brown Drive and Summit Drive based on projected traffic growth. The 2005 traffic study was based on a total of 225 hotel rooms and a 150 seat restaurant. The current development plan consists of 250 hotel rooms and a 100 seat restaurant. This modification in room count and restaurant size does not substantially change the results of the traffic study. A copy of the Traffic Impact Study is attached to this memorandum. 4. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL The applicant is proposing a combination of storm drainage pipes, drainage swales, infiltration (rain gardens) and expansion of the existing storm water pond to manage surface water runoff for the site. The drainage plan was approved by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission on April 12, 2007. A. Grading limits shall remain within the property boundary unless formal arrangements have been made with adjacent property owners. B. The Grading Plan shall be amended to show an emergency overflow route for the stormwater pond to Earle Brown Drive. The emergency overflow path shall be a minimum of two feet below the finished floor elevation of both hotel buildings. Page 3 of 4 Nq C. The Grading Plan shall be amended to show the normal water level and 100 -year high water level for the pond. D. The Developer shall install an impervious geotextile or clay liner within the pond expansion area to minimize the amount of infiltration from the pond. E. The storm water pond currently outlets through a 20 -ft long submerged pipe lead. The Utility Plan shall be amended to include removal and reinstallation of the existing outlet pipe lead and installation of a pipe apron set at the normal water elevation of 840.0. F. The property owner of the proposed development shall enter into an Agreement for Maintenance and Inspection of Utility and Storm Drainage Systems with the City of Brooklyn Center to insure the continued maintenance of on -site utilities and storm water facilities. The above comments are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Subsequent approval of the final plat and site plans may require additional modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of the water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, final grading and geometric design as established by the City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans. Page 4 of 4 a BENSHOOF ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 10417 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD, SUITE TWO HOPKINS, MN 55343 (952) 238 -1667 FAX (952) 238 -1671 April 6, 2005 Refer to File: 05 -24 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Blomstrom, City of Brooklyn C_eaer FROM: Edward F. Terhaar and David C. May RE: Results of Traffic Impact Study for the Proposed Hotel Near the Earle Brown Center PURPOSE The purpose of this memorandum is to present results of our traffic impact study for a proposed hotel and restaurant near the Earle Brown Center in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. Our work to date has involved an estimation of the number of trips generated by this development and the determination of impacts on the surrounding roadway network. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Location Characteristics The site for the proposed hotel and restaurant is located on the east side of Earle Brown Drive, north of Summit Drive and east of Shingle Creek Parkway, as shown in Figure 1. The Earle Brown Center is located farther to the northeast on Earle Brown Drive east of the development site. Office buildings are located on the west side of Earle Brown Drive opposite the development site. Access to a shopping center (featuring a Target) is located south of Summit Drive, opposite Earle Brown Drive. tS�' i' lI i���yRVE 1 it's 1�?:� ;f /f 1�/^ r z I. A i18 j IA011 as IENITN AVE. b t .i��' //r `r 'o ii RVE J[� (r.{ (Uilh if rQwc av ��__-z. �t�'� ui�r�.• A L r•�.� m P� Z )Li �(XER %ES (AVE. 1 _i�?` /l! A T z 4, ti AVE m m m m VINCENTI� AVE. J� n� Y y .t'E. fL a b'JI ca m .f r t uPToW AVE. cn Mi it L. AVE. C _l l.) E 1•: L a �F n Lt_! T QUEEN' A► l Z F rr +(t AVE °r °1't. �a� i` f a(I ft1, N. ul IV�� jJ �ti'�r KY, `Ii 1(EW C ovi 1 1 Nu ttt Aft c t N' 7/ i _Eak1E I' i a l 1� O k i6F(GAf A z \`Y s� 1 1 AYt r 0 1 Ot:ANI 771 AVE.(C' W —_i'� Z /r 3"t(Y, I r lit CD JI ANQX iI� �Y_JL" W_J I�tat__l Ih w v r wN .._Iti<. J _tAtaLS ��17 i .l[� �L 1L -I I AVE. �j c y I AYt u I t1Y1fA: FICViIft� C� to m O r �1r AVt I ttlArtt, tit AYE. AVf... AYC. Y v GIRARd W t �l GIRAf10 r• INE 1 iM1` to Nl Abt. Y L_.____.� i p, m AYE. A z AVE. II' EfdEkt� SWt �Im ILAVE.,r II7 f I fyNJ kRSOti (,r A tt lI l O C II RUf'QNT j7E AVE. �N f t (f 1 (Ut 1 F l i is p r y L, LOLI AX II1 I�— �L._ m W. A r` m al HRYANt f•7 C A! Iltl It ti _I�r II li I 7 1 FfJLFiI A_VL p 1 o FLk A (1 t tt(IALE l E tom /J Y(k ..T ItRLI AS e^ y .1. Z Y�'..�. �-.fVERWCk]tfli, =k. P.,izt.., �m n j Wt t t tfn: f f 'fCROALE R0. WILLOW LA JJJf✓ f Mr. Todd Blomstrom -3- April 6, 2005 Development Characteristics The proposed development consists of a 225 room hotel and a 150 seat restaurant within the hotel. An indoor water park is also planned for the property, however, the use of the water park is projected to be exclusive to hotel guests (no additional vehicle trips are generated). Access to the development will be provided via two exclusive driveways from Earle Brown Drive, with tie -ins provided to two existing driveways from Earle Brown Drive. Figure 2 shows the proposed development site plan.. Existing Roadwav Characteristics Summit Drive, Earle Brown Drive, and the Target shopping center access intersect at a four -way intersection approximately 500 feet east of Shingle Creek Parkway. The intersection is currently controlled by stop signs for southbound traffic on Earle Brown Drive and for northbound traffic exiting the Target shopping center. The eastbound approach of Summit Drive has a dedicated right turn lane, a through lane, and a shared through/left -turn lane. The westbound approach of Summit Drive has a shared through/left -turn lane and a shared through/right -turn lane. The southbound approach of Earle Brown Drive and the northbound approach of the shopping center access each have a dedicated right -turn lane and a shared through/left -turn lane. Summit Drive has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Existing Traffic Volumes In order to determine the baseline traffic volumes, turning movement counts were conducted on Thursday, March 10, 2005 from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The resulting existing volumes recorded through these counts are presented later in this report. TRAFFIC FORECASTS Traffic forecasts were established for existing conditions, the year 2007 with only background growth "no- build" condition), and the year 2007 with development trips "build" condition). The traffic forecasts consist of existing traffic volumes, background growth, and new development trips. Trip generation rates for all uses in the area were established based on data presented in the seventh edition of Trip Generation (2003), published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. PARKOM STALLS L f .1ifJZNOI AREI INDOOR WAtER PARK v 32,000 SQ. Ft 4 1 N APPRO OMATE SCALE 0 120' LBROOKLYN ITY OF CENTER TRAFFIC STUDY FOR FIGURE 2 PROPOSED HOTEL SITE SITE PLAN OF ASSOCIATES, INC. TIONENGINEERSANDPLANNERS Mr. Todd Blomstrom -5- April 6, 2005 Development Trio Generation Table 1 presents the resultant trips generated by the development during the weekday AM peak hour, and Table 2 presents the resultant trips generated by the development during the weekday PM peak hour. Table 1 Weekday AM Peak Hour Trip Generation Adjusted Gross Trips Gross Trios I New Trips Pass -By Trips Use Size In Out In 1 1 Out In Out In Out Hotel Meeting Rooms 225 Rooms 77 4 9 77 49 77 49 0 0 Quality Restaurant 150 Seats 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 TOTAL 79 51 j 79 51 79 51 0 1 0 Table 2 Weekday PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Adjusted Gross Trips Gross Trips New Tnps _Pass -B Trips Use Size In O In Out In Out In Out ut Hotel M_eet Rooms J 225 Rooms 70 1 63 70 63 70 63 0 0 Quality Restaurant 1 5_0 Seats 26 13 19 10 15 _8 4 2 TOTAL 96 76 1 89 73 i 85 71 4 2 It is expected that a percentage of the gross vehicle trips generated by the restaurant will occur internal to the site (i.e., from the hotel to the restaurant and vice versa). A reduction of 25% was applied to the gross vehicle trips for the restaurant during the PM peak hour. The adjusted gross trips generated by the development site can be classified into one of the following trip types: New Trips Trips solely to and from the subject development Pass -By Trips Existing through trips on Summit Drive that will include a stop at the development site For PM peak hour trips generated by the restaurant, 80% of the trips generated were determined to be new trips, and 20% were determined to be pass -by trips from Summit Drive. For AM peak hour restaurant trips and all hotel trips, all trips were determined to be new trips. Mr. Todd Blomstrom -6- April 6, 2005 Directional Distribution of Trips In general, new trips generated by the development will be distributed as follows: 75% to /from west on Summit Drive towards Shingle Creek Parkway 15% to /from east on Summit Drive towards TH 100 5% to /from the Target shopping center 5% to /from Earle Brown Drive towards the Earle Brown Center Pass -by trips generated by the development are expected to be distributed as follows: 65% from WB Summit Drive 35% from EB Summit Drive Background Growth in Traffic Volumes Traffic volumes on Summit Drive are expected to increase regardless of the proposed development due to continuing growth in the area. Based on the most recent available daily traffic volume counts in the area, through volumes on Summit Drive were increased by 2% per year in order to account for such growth in traffic volumes by the year 2007. Total Projected Traffic Volumes After accounting for existing volumes, background volume growth, and volumes due to the proposed development, we have prepared the total volume forecasts shown in Figure 3. This figure shows the projected weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes for each of the following scenarios: Existing Conditions 2007 No -Build (background traffic growth) 2007 Build (background traffic growth plus development trips) A.M. PEAK HOUR N 9 NOT TO SCALE tC9 r 63193/75 84/83/83 13/13/13 146/146/206 SUMMIT DR. I 128/1331133 3 V a r 36/36/36 r r r r r T 2005 DQSTINQ 2007 NO -BUILD 2007 BUILD XX/XKM P.M. PEAK HOUR N NOT TO SCALE O� 32/32/45 41/41/ /339 41/41/41 66/66/134 SUMMIT DR. 1581164/161 8"W88 2045 Sa"NG 2007 NO -BUILD 2007 BUILD XXl�O CITY OF FIGURE 3 BROOKLYN CENTER TRAFFIC STUDY FOR WEEKDAY PROPOSED A.M. AND P.M. HOTEL SITE per( HOUR �BEN%IOOF ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATIONENOINEERSANDPLANNERB TRAFFIC VOLUMES Mr. Todd Blomstrom -8- April 6, 2005 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS The intersection of Summit Drive and Earle Brown Drive was analyzed to determine the impacts of traffic generated by the proposed hotel and restaurant development. Capacity analyses were performed using Highway Capacity Software (HCS). The results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which range from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with very little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The LOS results are shown in Figure 4. During the weekday AM peak hour, both approaches of Summit Drive operate at LOS A under all three scenarios. Right turns from both the southbound Earle Brown Drive approach and the northbound shopping center approach operate at LOS A under all three scenarios, while northbound and southbound left turns and through movements operate at LOS C under all three scenarios. During the AM peak hour, all movements operate at acceptable levels of service under all three scenarios. During the weekday PM peak hour, both approaches of Summit Drive operate at LOS A under all three scenarios. Right turns from the southbound Earle Brown Drive approach operate at LOS B under all three scenarios. Through movements and left turns from the southbound Earle Brown Drive approach operate at LOS C under existing conditions and the 2007 no -build scenario, and LOS D under the 2007 build scenario. Right turns from the northbound shopping center approach operate at LOS A under all three scenarios. Left turns and through movements from the northbound shopping center approach operate at LOS C under existing conditions, LOS D under the 2007 no -build scenario, and LOS E under the 2007 build scenario. During the weekday PM peak hour, the northbound and southbound left turn and through movements experience increased delays due to the background growth and trips generated by the proposed development. While the increased delays will make these movements less desirable, it is our opinion that motorists will not find these movements overly difficult or unsafe. Rather, motorists will need to wait slightly longer before finding an acceptable gap in traffic to enter onto Summit Drive. In addition, traffic exiting the Target site does have other access alternatives available. A.M. PEAK HOUR N NOT TO SCALE a UU A/A/A aU A/A/A A/A/A E-� SUMMIT DR. A/A/A UUa 2005 EXISTING 2007 NO -BUILD I r— 2007 BUILD XX/)om P.M. PEAK HOUR N �i NOT TO SCALE AINA e A/A A SUMMIT DR, A/A/A Una 200S EXISTING 2007 NO -BUILD F— 2007 BUILD XXIXXIXX CITY OF FIGURE 4 [BRO CENTER TRAFFIC STUDY FOR WEEKDAY PROPOSED A.M. AND P.M. HOTEL SITE PEAK HOUR OOF ASSOCIATES, INC. RTATIONEN6INEEI {BAMDPLAIINERB LEVELS OF SERVICE Mr. Todd Blomstrom -10- April 6, 2005 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis presented in this report, we have concluded the following: The proposed hotel and restaurant development are estimated to generate 130 trips during the weekday AM peak hour and 162 trips during the weekday PM peak hour. During the weekday AM peak hour, all turning movements from both directions of Summit Drive at the western intersection with Earle Brown Drive operate at LOS A under existing conditions, the no -build scenario, and under post development buildout. Left turns and through movements from Earle Brown Drive and from the Target shopping center operate at LOS C under all three scenarios; right turns operate at LOS A. During the weekday PM peak hour, all turning movements from both directions of Summit Drive at the western intersection with Earle Brown Drive operate at LOS A under existing conditions, the no -build scenario, and under post development buildout. Left turns and through movements approaching Summit Drive from Earle Brown Drive operate at LOS C under existing conditions and the no -build scenario; the movements operate at LOS D under post development build conditions. Left turns and through movements approaching Summit Drive from the Target shopping center operate at LOS C under existing conditions, LOS D under the no -build scenario, and LOS E under post development build conditions. We are confident the subject intersection will be able to adequately accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed development. The existing two -way stop control at the intersection will function adequately under the post- development build condition. Member Diane Niesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. .200 -97 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2005 -010 SUBMITTED BY LHB ARCHITECTURE WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2005 -010 submitted by LHB Architecture proposes rezoning from CIA (Service -Office, no height limit) to PUD /C1A (Planned Unit Development/Service- Office, no height limit) of a 6.2 acre site located on the east side of the west leg of Earle Brown Drive (to be addressed as 6300 Earle Brown Drive); and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends the rezoning of the above mentioned property and development plan approval for a 250 room hotel containing a 100 seat restaurant and a 32,000 sq. ft. water park facility on the above mentioned site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on June 16, 2005 when a staff report and public testimony regarding the rezoning and development plan were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Application No. 2005 -010 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2005 -02 on June 16, 2005; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered Application No. 2005 -010 at its June 27, 2005 meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered this Planned Unit Development request in light of all testimony received, the Guidelines for Evaluating Rezonings contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the Planned Unit Development ordinance contained in Section 35 -355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the City's Compre- hensive Plan and the Planning Commission's recommendations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Application No. 2005 -010 submitted by LHB Architecture be approved in light of the following considerations: 1. The Planned Unit Development is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Planned Unit Development proposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -97 3. The utilization of the property as proposed under the Planned Unit Development Rezoning is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with ordinance standards except for allowing a green strip along the Earl Brown Drive right of way that is less than 15 ft. This modification from the CIA ordinance standard is justified on the basis of the development plan being an appropriate plan for this area and that it is off set or mitigated by various factors contained in the approved site plan. 4. The Planned Unit Development proposal is considered consistent with the P P P recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. 5. The Planned Unit Development proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this development can be considered an asset to the community. 6. In light of the above considerations, it is believed that the Guidelines for Evaluating Rezonings as contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Application No. 2005 -010 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations. i 1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. I 2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits to assure completion of all required site improvements. 4. A minimum B-612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 5. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. I I i RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -97 6. The building shall be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing s stem to Y meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 7. Underground irrigation shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. 9. The applicant shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to the release of the performance guarantee. 10. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center Standard Specifications and Details. 11. The applicant shall provide appropriate erosion control during construction as approved by the City Engineering Department and obtain an NPDES construction site erosion control permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. 12. The applicant's storm water management plan shall be approved by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission prior to the issuance of building permits for this project. 13. The applicant shall enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. Said agreement shall be filed with the title to the property and shall acknowledge the specific modifications to the CIA underlying zoning district as well as other conditions of approval. The agreement shall further assure compliance with the development plans submitted with this application. 14. The development plans shall be modified in the following manner. a. To provide a 3 '/2 to 4 ft. high decorative fence along the edge of the property line abutting the Earle Brown Drive right of way to off set or mitigate the negative aspects of a reduced green strip. The decorative fence shall consist of concrete piers and wrought iron similar to that provided at the 69' and Brooklyn Boulevard project. i J i RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -97 b. A modified landscape plan to be consistent with.the landscape point system requiring 412 landscape points and a proper distribution of plantings on the site. c. Modification to the parking plan to provide a minimum parking space width of 8 R. 8 in. June 27. 2005 ate Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kay Lasman and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Myrna Kragness, Kathleen Carmody, Kay Lasman, and Diane Niesen; and the following voted against the same: Mary 0' Connor; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. I City of Brooklyn Center Section 35 -208 REZONING EVALUATION POLICY AND REVIEW GUIDELINES. 1. Purpose The City Council finds that effective maintenance of the comprehensive planning and land use classifications is enhanced through uniform and equitable evaluation of periodic proposed changes to this Zoning Ordinance; and for this purpose, by the adoption of Resolution No. 77- 167, the City Council has established a rezoning evaluation policy and review guidelines. 2. Policv It is the policy of the City that: A) Zoning classifications must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and, B) Rezoning proposals will not constitute "spot zoning defined as a zoning decision, which discriminates in favor of a particular landowner and does not relate to the Comprehensive Plan or to accepted planning principles. 3. Procedure Each rezoning proposal will be considered on its merits, measured against the above policy and against these guidelines, which may be weighed collectively or individually as deemed by the City. 4. Guidelines A. Is there a clear and public need or benefit? B. Is the proposed zoning consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use classifications? C. Can all permitted uses in the proposed zoning district be contemplated for development of the subject property? D. Have there been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area since the subject property was zoned? E. In the case of City- initiated rezoning proposals, is there a broad public purpose evident? F. Will the subject property bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed zoning districts? G. Is the subject property generally unsuited for uses permitted in the present zoning district, with respect to size, configuration, topography or location? H. Will the rezoning result in the expansion of a zoning district, warranted by: 1) Comprehensive planning; 2) The lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district; or, 3) The best interests of the community? I. Does the proposal demonstrate merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of an individual parcel? 2) Public recreational buildings and parks, playgrounds and athletic fields. 3) Signs as permitted in the Brooklyn Center Sign Ordinance. Section 35 -355. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. Subdivision 1. Pumose. The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) district is to promote flexibility in land development and redevelopment, preserve aesthetically significant and environmentally sensitive site features, conserve energy and ensure a high quality of design. Subdivision 2. Classification of PUD Districts: Permitted Uses,-, Aunlicable Regulations. a. Upon rezoning for a PUD, the district shall be designated by the letters "PUD" followed by the alphanumeric designation of the underlying zoning district which may be either the prior zoning classification or a new classification. In cases of mixed use PUDs, the City Council shall, whenever reasonably practicable, specify underlying zoning classifications for the various parts of the PUD. When it is not reasonably practicable to so specify underlying zoning classifications, the Council may rezone the district, or any part thereof, to "PUD- MIXED." b. Regulations governing uses and structures in PUDs shall be the same as those governing the underlying zoning district subject to the following: 1. Regulations may be modified expressly by conditions imposed by the Council at the time of rezoning to PUD. 2. Regulations are modified by implication only to the extent necessary to comply with the development plan of the PUD. 3. In the case of districts rezoned to PUD -MDCED, the Council shall specify regulations applicable to uses and structures in various parts of the district. City of Brooklyn Center 3547 City Ordinance C. For purposes of determining applicable regulations for uses or structures on land adjacent to or in the vicinity of the PUD district which depend on the zoning of the PUD district, the underlying zoning classification of PUD districts shall be deemed to be the zoning classification of the district. In the case of a district zoned PUD- MIXED, the underlying zoning classification shall be deemed to be the classification which allows as a permitted use any use which is permitted in the PUD district and which results in the most restrictive regulation of adjacent or nearby properties. Subdivision 3. Development Standards. a. A PUD shall have a minimum area of one acre, excluding land included within the floodway or flood fringe overlay districts and excluding existing rights -of -way, unless the City finds that at least one of the following conditions exists: 1. There are unusual physical features of the property or of the surrounding neighborhood such that development as a PUD will conserve a physical or terrain feature of importance to the neighborhood or community; 2. The property is directly adjacent to or across a public right -of -way from property which previously was developed as a PUD and the new PUD will be perceived as and function as an extension of that previously approved development; or 3. The property is located in a transitional area between different land uses and the development will be used as a buffer between the uses. b. Within a PUD, overall density for residential developments shall be consistent with Section 35 -400 of this ordinance. Individual buildings or lots within a PUD may exceed these standards, provided that density for the entire PUD does not exceed the permitted standards. C. Setbacks, buffers and greenstrips within a PUD shall be consistent with Section 35 -400 to 35 -414 and Section 35 -700 of this ordinance unless the developer can demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that a lesser standard should be permitted with the addition of a screening treatment or other mitigative measures. City of Brooklyn Center 35 -48 City Ordinance d. Parking provided for uses within a PUD shall be consistent with the parking requirements contained in Section 35 -704 of this ordinance unless the developer can demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that a lesser standard should be permitted on the grounds of the complementarity of peak parking demands by the uses within the PUD. The City may require execution of a restrictive covenant limiting future use of the property to those uses which will continue this parking complementarity, or which are otherwise approved by the City. Subdivision 4. General Standards., a. The City may allow more than one principal building to be constructed on each platted lot within a PUD. b. A PUD which involves only one land use or a single housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the purposes and objectives of this section. C. A PUD may only contain uses consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. d. All property to be included within a PUD shall be under unified ownership or control or subject to such legal restrictions or covenants as maybe necessary to ensure compliance with the approved development plan and site plan. e. The uniqueness of each PUD requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities, public facilities and the approval of land subdivision maybe subject to modifications from the City ordinances generally governing them. The City Council may, therefore, approve streets, utilities, public facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with usual specifications or ordinance requirements where it is found that such are not required in the interests of the residents or of the City, except that these subdivisions and plans must be in conformance with all watershed, state, and federal storm water, erosion control, and wetlands requirements. Subdivision 5. Aoulication and Review. a. Implementation of a PUD shall be controlled by the development plan. The development plan maybe approved or disapproved by the City Council after evaluation by the Planning Commission. Submission of the development plan shall be made to the Director of Planning and Inspection on such forms and accompanied by such information and documentation as the City may deem necessary or convenient, but shall include at a minimum the following: City of Brooklyn Center 35 -49 City Ordinance 1. Street and utility locations and sizes; 2. A drainage plan, including location and size of pipes and water storage areas; 3. A grading plan, including temporary and permanent erosion control provisions; 4. A landscape plan; 5. A lighting plan; 6. A plan for timing and phasing of the development; 7. Covenants or other restrictions proposed for the regulation of the development; 8. A site plan showing the location of all structures and parking areas; 9. Building renderings or elevation drawings of all sides of all buildings to be constructed in at least the first phase of development; and 10. Proposed underlying zoning classification or classifications. Such information may be in a preliminary form, but shall be sufficiently complete and accurate to allow an evaluation of the development by the City. b. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the development plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be published in the official newspaper and actual notice shall be mailed to the applicant and adjacent property owners as required by Section 35 -210 of this ordinance. The Planning Commission shall review the development plan and make such recommendations as it deems appropriate regarding the plan within the time limits established by Section 35 -210 of this ordinance. C. Following receipt of the recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City Council shall hold such hearing as it deems appropriate regarding the matter. The City Council shall act upon the development plan within the time limits established by Section 35 -2 10 of this ordinance. Approval of the development plan shall constitute rezoning of the property to PUD and conceptual approval of the elements of the plan. In addition to the guidelines provided in Section 35 -208 of this ordinance, the City Council shall base its actions on the rezoning upon the following criteria: City of Brooklyn Center 35 -50 City Ordinance 1. Compatibility of the plan with the standards, purposes and intent of this section; 2. Consistency of the plan with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; 3. The impact of the plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located; and 4. The adequacy of internal site organization, uses, densities, circulation, parking facilities, public facilities, recreational areas, open spaces, and buffering and landscaping. The City Council may attach such conditions to its approval as it may determine to be necessary to better accomplish the purposes of the PUD district. d. Prior to construction on any site zoned PUD, the developer shall seek plan approval pursuant to Section 35 -230 of this ordinance. In addition to the information specifically required by Section 35 -230, the developer shall submit such information as may be deemed necessary or convenient by the City to review the consistency of the proposed development with the approved development plan. The plan submitted for approval pursuant to Section 35 -230 shall be in substantial compliance with the approved development plan. Substantial compliance shall mean that buildings, parking areas and roads are in essentially the same location as previously approved; the number of dwelling units, if any, has not increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; the floor area of nonresidential areas has not been increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; no building has been increased in the number of floors; open space has not been decreased or altered from its original design or use, and lot coverage of any individual building has not been increased or decreased by more than 10 percent. e. Prior to construction on any site zoned PUD, the developer shall execute a development agreement in a form satisfactory to the City. f. Applicants may combine development plan approval with the plan approval required by Section 35 -230 by submitting all information required for both simultaneously. g. After approval of the development plan and the plan approval required by Section 35 -230, nothing shall be constructed on the site and no building permits shall be issued except in conformity with the approved plans. City of Brooklyn Center 35 -51 City Ordinance h. If within 12 months following approval by the City Council of the development plan, no building permits have been obtained or, if within 12 months after the issuance of building permits no construction has commenced on the area approved for the PUD district, the City Council may initiate rezoning of the property. L Any maj or amendment to the development plan may be approved by the City Council following the same notice and hearing procedures specified in this section. An amendment shall be considered major if it involves any change greater than that permitted by Subdivision 5d of this section. Changes which are determined by the City Council to be minor may be made if approved by the Planning Commission after such notice and hearing as may be deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission. City of Brooklyn Center 35 -52 City Ordinance 4 6 A SJA Architects 11F &p.W&.M .340 F F S D L A dk *k 1&p1cY 50007 R—(mZ1&)7m"mm N. 04r"17 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY For OLIVER COMPANIES N T E R 5 T A T H G H W A Y /V 0 y 4 V E. 4z- 4z- D Q 0 ff 2 1 a Q \T C TRACT F V126UTY MA OWNER. BROOKLYN CENTER HRA 1• °`�P war l r i 11 1 0 i ���0 6 Brooklyn center Embassy Stites 7i LOT 2 OWNER CITY COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT umtoN L TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A 1 TOPMRAPHir. --FY A 2 8 4 5 7 2 7 N SEAS rchitects &db r INA m *M—*1012 ph-(Zlg)rAm F.. (218)rAVIT 0 15 30 w 90 SCALE r -HREVIAPONS zY V APPROXIMATE DISTURBED AREA Is i 6.20 ACRES E 7 .—E 4 D D IE LOT I U vvvi I I v0 r <.j, r lr ji �x �.r% I ❑z :w,o«,N..w.,: a•.. P`` ,a.� s ,:Ili i�i J ki s l 01- C f 91 7 Brooklyn center Eftassy Suites 'Al COUNTY FED L 0 T 2 DEMOu R 1 1 0EA M011TION PIAN A A C2•0 2 8 4 ff 20% YMM—) 1—' 1 M ate„ SJA Architects E wa PI IE— &fd.8"d A., IF D seem F—c"a)m•n F. 9118)r"17 P-- f 4 W E �A SK-1-M CAR v Fill C�c Zczl— ON— E E= AP"OXI MAT E DISTURBED AREA IS I PROVQSED FFE 850 6.20 ACRES 0 -tA -N. D j 77— 44 m. Z X, 8 49.4 Vill, "n' I I I �F� 1 P N e u w sox w a muo .e„ moor .wu urzex. u mm, mnu 4 J742P ALI i ii k 4i JY- L B m BrWyn CWqr ;2 Embas Suite s 6* N I., J i COUNTY FEDER 0�: 1 -An —N-F AND E ROSION —T— 11 AN T GRADING AND Co EN EROSION CONTROL PLAN A arm c� p l N.I mo A—), ANA I A C3.0 r v.nvnzm meu zwvni5 M SJA Architects S& 340 V <Aasuxes: 71 Ekg fts1wt F l owY OW �..__D ..�,.,w Fw��Al7�t7 F mn v w� ww J �o Fv 4 oau t wox�xwr a,ro�wn. e,o a�aaucno wwro O u u. rm rx ro amain vr• i owa: as wcm[ aw ne r 0 15 30 w 90 I n PROPOSED FFE 0 850. unun wn.� wnow a wa II I E rs gym.,, I •I .,a I r. I "".�r.roa,mN h"' ,-'r i� I I •1 a I I I a a��.°aa„ 1 -..rt. 1 PROPOSED FFE 849.4 !i I I "u I I ••Po I Y l I i I I I I Morro_ 5� I a- I II I .c m a.w.w .rs ec rowwrr cwrs,nw ww+ I w I I fi` I l I r 97 n �I I -naw win m. xa-arcx maw.m. Br ook l yn Center g..__ e n I �_rt ro �ro ro e E Suites 1 Embassy COUNTY FED ER �RD�fiN x, mr,nma -x II I xw w x w amp[ am win we a[e, ,aw nww ww-c wo. aim¢ rs m w2 ma J t I I\ x :m, m•,c„e oar,t .x a•. aaaa m. ucrv. w ,uvmn K ,...ovxrt .xo axve mw.r ro ate•. r ac aw av am wurc• •ro aavmn w< mr•mmrt wb -nwu 1 CON RE 7 ro-ww :`m :m� unurr iini iry ai are w.,....w' oe.^°" oa..mx gym. w•.aw...a w..,. a�.,�w. I o i la<, -m„�I I m I m I m I x.�w- .,ma..,,.xa� I w.. rsa. m,. rto°•.w,rsw.�.e�.a<wo+,..ramsw.o, n�•��.:.._ A Iawme,al I x. I m I m I ,a u.a<,°MwR. >a�.,ww„ I sr• -•w na amc.a¢wwwwnraww,u a n v o m mxa,w,vsw A."� APPROXIMATE DISTURBED AREA IS 6.20 ACRES °a -,inn I I m -.,K .wx m„., am ....row...- C4.0 t 2 3 s 6 e A 6 A C] SJA ArcWtect WANOWN Imo,. ✓till w V E I ..t. J I I iTI APPROXIMATE DISTURBED AREA IS 6.20 ACRES Y m PROPOSED FFE 950.0 I tic ALt 00 so m to r nmv J3•.. 41 h m ED PROPOSED FFE 949.4 3 9' p 44 M I COUNTY FEDERA URMt` bN I t Errlb>iasy sates .1 CONFEREI� 7, EA z GEOMETFAC Pi l TOTAL STALL COUNT: 295 TOTAL HANDICAPPED STALLS: 11 ••r.•....., Ic.•- -�`I REQUIRED HANDICAPPED STALLS: 1 1 r'�.. ....r" r l 8 REGULAR STALLS 3 VAN ACCESSABLE STALL �-s i Y C5.0 a 0'90 a I mm EM rw»4 Mw. _r ^I s a�...�i i ,�i yY� fY j��. _wm r S11Y1341W0 5"0A" Jem UANO018 �NxGL°R6� iry as zz� i— I _I ..o.e..�• _I F-� �_I I a`�.�.»�.,,. ate` .iH —L l 4 dbLaia nrruJa> urva uaav is (b'J/ nova nJivJ aaia aiJrvu awnnory errs -avn 'lnnbJ/ Ji�nrvan rvnw n.,10 >r airrnrvvn narri> J »vl a3uro x Bnnu v O 2ta- .ee._I dal FZ '..I .Si ifl @i9� Y]uoa wvmw p AIO f Yv awe_,:. m..,.» AGiBSSH nen�aoa rnrvs wsn sr unra �aa WN -u�2P �iusuu> i�:u n.au avn eui wnmm� >nrnnan wa.unv> rvH63ni »vas ni.nn Z iTirvaiva irvi�i nianaaivm r.ivn ,...r w 7TT��,r irv.auw au 3 WI i'O� wmor u� wi wre im .»a urn .miw w' +ww 1! _.»e..w. w»a WAMM RRSL� L019➢ 01°K78 u0 M TA _C4L" AY 'i�A� aR S I6+9�Oi°344 840e1140rd VrS od a ■oov 0000 i 000.■ i l��q` �i� o ear ��'1► 1'1 ,'c lo o, e.. ;.1w ,,I, p.► 1, 11111111 1 1111, rm iiwoumiwo�i a.i III un' IG o lllLiiliii7.° iii�8... i�► r �1 /ii �■■■_�eor u. oonuo.■ uu■uu.. a P RN pom moo• 7 i 1I: t'ija 'i �i+ ►ice ►i 1 '1 tilt 1■ �(U I �.��pw�� �'I �o'� -R Jp 4t tit. s, Ee�� ��f o �1► o oe e 1 �1 s� t •Ilr e e SJA Architects F H& &o b*W B&9N F DA d%k*..*5W F. cnqrmyll A W TTRl11 e 7 I PAOPOSCp flE 0.50.0 f E 1 (III i�f" I I III I I 1 f I t� r X111 11 2 R i err c a.. I f k I 1 -7 PROPOSEp D f _M x 7i rf ,II 1. k i rO 1 I ff 310p�N u w 9R COUNTY FEDE3CREDIP" COUNT ONI1x 1 Y F �R t n EDlT` r} ry EN -CA, CONFEREI�C .CEM7 �.�ilTilil7lilll�. I x 11, W o 100 TI 1117 I iTl 11 r 11 F —INC. —F DPAwarc g;,,p/ a¢ aanansL"n sITC RRAINAf.G Irm,... �x�aem uvxexmxaco`w" .n rm l ro r.� Immerw,vl a., -,wwr a- n.n),rowl Ism- .w,lxw)swwl lP I I aw •a ..n I av w,. e.a tm waaz I z r.w wr. ww 1 ¢av I ra.n v am I I aw I r.w I ,.w I nm I w.re I I w,. I w ..v I wa ¢n I I I .a, I I .aw I I w.ro I uw I mmvr.w .ww I i I acv I v.0 I an I a.r I vm I trr I �.w I w aw www a l B mn I a.,z I u.m iaw ..0 wo I w.rs rn.w o.w I 6.' a, cn a« zo' mwwowv ¢.®w:.. Broold Center I I I I am v.v ar. vw I an I rozwe¢., Embassy Stal INSCEClx) a I v.e. a aw ar. a I vw 1 v.w ro ewe ¢..e X14 GRAnINf. H Gnll� I I wm +n I l..w ra« ww w.x mvwwm uvo 0—h" E�.I��iIIA� SITF MAP STORMWATER wm ro v m ww NO SCALE POLLUTION PREVENTION PLA PROJECT NARRAR 1 A re.....urw, '�r8'�"'° emm,,.maewww�.a.,www¢ „m.w,.mrw_ I I I a» I ¢r, I .y I Iwwww.e.r,,.w�, MUM nnrsa: 11ON w. ew.¢,:. I'"'° ,.w I aw I A� .�.w ww, w._, A .w w. I ww I a I .w I I m I C7.0 1 2 3 4 0 9 7 IJR il► ►a .a,yi.. J 1 Hoo. .dA',. ��I �QI X QI III III j 0 D, �w! i l iii °nnu l numuooiiuuu uoouuaoiumitiwmu 1� 1 il k IL >z 1�/1�� e ot° °o i4 1 ill�il► LCD oao �1� eo ilk a" V IP o ilk it il► o° HEINE Bliss o® ormom BRNO ®o C ®0 ILI; I I Ile7■ c� i 1 i it �r.�" �1C'�. q i I r' •e lf. T����� ♦a 0 pp d. 2 7 4 I SJA ArcMacts O_e _e b 340 F DOuth, Mh� SM U: -IF: I Ph- (218) 724-8578 F- (218)7248717 Mi D". I IN p7l J=l CM3 0 UR 4-4 I I 1 I I i I I .n I I I N/ I I I t I I I I I i i i i� I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I it, 11 illii'iii!il� i'!i li I� i i i! i! l i iii I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 L� ..u. h} «w I I I 1 I I I I SOM M LPAL ftM GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE: 18.030 Sp U� �9YaAXN� Embassy Mes SECOND FLOOR PLAN A112 v ff o o v o® ii nmm I.na i.�. nnmm unnnn ��I u nnmm MO RE I to u o .n Gi G r�� rr rr it iI ii� ii iii I�� l I���I a o 0 oS i 3o3i �,rl--rr rr rr rr r■ r■ .a M- IIIIIII IIIIIIIIII i•} nnnm s nnunn °"°rminnn 4'=' 'Ii `-..i ..rr" -..r■ GG iG $iii'°°, rr _Irr Y o o I a a=$�o `I °.I of i. .ri ug to s. .11 gir.�• E IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII »u.-- —.��I ,g�,; $ii -i ■I■ rl' o o a :moo$ i■.�saa.. i.■ x..11 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII .n �r WIN 'rr'rr rrs^ rrB I:: :i a.. y. r.e is -1rr uI L nm i.. nnmm I ii. o$ 1..9.i �o:. o o Ir•�,.;�r.$� o a.- °`,..r�l ii iu =.irg IIIII IIIIIIIIII o =o °�'�.a..i. ..0 nnmm mm�m v,_',„ i ■r ■.I'.,� 'Irrrr� 1111111111 I a. a IIIIIIIIII Itllllllll Imo. 0 1.. }r■ rrP.. rr rr "RE, ii *Irr ■r ■r rr rr =rr' r Gi iu i.ii ii s gFO -o --,o 1.■ ..1 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII F— .I■ �a«M.. iG Gi o° r I unnnn :I a ..Iio I IIIIIIIIII 1111111111 .■alb d.. ��4, IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII GG f o to o;'i<o iG iG.. 1 -So T. err r■ r■, rr. �r .fir rr3 $rra ar■$ rr rr ®r■ �iia $ii ii? r■ r�■ ..rr rr ,,.�rrl°• o •azdo �,i.�, to unnnn nnmm unnnn unnnn F 1.,.„, ■r r■ iG iiiii_ii 3.. ter. ..j,:. IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII I mo. s''�.— .i'si�.,.,� nlnuOIL o. JR °."..fi r. rr Il�r. rre t ■rl ii ii l iiialii' iii ii ii ':?ima r r. K ■r «r■,. err u; .I unnnn u ems !ms ao..oa� g unnnn munm IrrdI I lii ii rr rr l'" IIIIIIIIII 1111111111 -sir.- _pn9' -'o° i.. ��I ••._<a,.. I....., :o,.� I iG iG iii .I ..s�: i of rl■ ii� ii =�ii$i�� F.. .'..:^w<�'� "6�`{...,:.c a fl fl f f� a v �p', A�JIl�Y6"J �I 0 o D V v O O m D m© p 1 M n 1111111 lily Yr a�� J IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII WIN IN ..6 3■■ n■ G g IIIIIIIIII "'"IIIIIIIIII'Ii ■1 og +...T. (off i....1 t m11u1 co.x kx n ...s„ °,dam. °`zu,: it ".ii4 `iirrC`a.” ..n.:>:.■, ,..q.°" .te ■.■a ?..�.■61. —h P IIIIIIIIII !g.= s._ ?rr..,�,;.�.i J■, r s." ii �i ..�I �unr ff i` ii .::iii■ xa o „iiw.. mm�m nnnnu tee- i, M' ■1 -r.° r.l'. ..$ate ..egi .111111111 1�.,. m ,.�..._.sa= w..P °C... ae..a: ii .'..r.l irr ii mm a w.. u■ ??.rt .i- i.a r.- n■„ a .rd Illlltllll IIIIIIIIII 1 °`40�Y■15■■i fa gg nr .r'. a .rl:,»: ■rC IIIIIIIIII (IIIIIIIII o` o,ir$'o.. o ,.iilinu�, 'iArw■ri■I<.� ..F:.. ;ii a...s «...■t3,: �f.. ■■.fir■. NN ,s..■ �,a .7 ,..z ��n■.. 6.. ?..it. IIIIIIIIII (IIIIIIIII ..a r.a oa 4.. n■ ffi. mow.., .u� of J■. ;i.ir IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII n. Pii iia i� -.rs no onmu :�I••„„ -0 u. _mss- Bir e ,r., m=�u -s.■e IIIIIIIIII (IIIIIIIII IV MAI NN NN rr i_ (IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII a j. .rte v rrd`° Sc ;�.a E.. .`Y.e�' y �i�':, .ice �i Ifi n ..�y.., .a s.. s� u..,,,,..;:. L ..:�b��.� _,_<n■ :::i■ t 'Wi■: IIIIIIIIII ii G I IIIIIIIIII o -n. o:` I iiii. ii :r.n■ r. ...;a..r,.`< nr o m,ur ii iii:.. IIIIIIIII (IIIII IIII v man NE Rm °�11 ..n. .g mm�m IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIII1111111f1111111111111111111IIllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� r r� r7 frr nr(,_� IT .,1,,,, ■r r7 r7 I■ ■a 1 r+ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIC t vl ���,�f 1 1, .,1,11,1, .,1,,,,1, IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIId111111111111111111111111111 Igll f a f, fl .0 ur pip,_ -...r ,I;aa^ rcrol; ■It i 111 111 [�]1 1�1 111 Gil III 'a e 8 4 s e ue x rcn snsxr Asee M ewn sna ar,y �m.: ,.0 aleua�irxue o� Auselr s.i Architects 11 Esu F OeY I I I I �101a 0e61 Su8n 940 F Ou Street kAh Mnn 55802 Ph— (218)7248578 1 I ,1. '•I: I I f Fu (218)7248717 sore�n com 1 i I I I t�e7C6YlAF1tI6. sso1 016 I C F40RT11 t3ev ATb11 em n neniall .1oa m I r 1 E I I I I ns 1r1 nesreo sumsr —i�{ I som m, E a!M 1 Y 4 .00OU I 1 �W.NR 717d 1 HOER ata a L J ,.r.�.. �7A, Aeee L I i rc.Ir we e sssa alnll 1 C=am'= eiev A71�N 9F7ATOR ure 70 M®1 ene t3eu .,r ra Oe-••- C !=e" A1e1M m a sssx a+ersls Anne oAS�a surtss Ienee s z m 4mucra'Imsw6 7 mn rv.rer oIII TTIIo IloIOr IO T T I 1 T I T 1 I T I q 7F 1 I I I sar elr 7 C nlVA710N I Auwr I17Pa ow ftoldyn Cen m yserA. ror Anse» I Embassy ass ter 8SS)I SUteB Ow BUUM M"ATKM I II II L TO A ttl!'0"" esa alasl� a.w� C w0'IM13lVATe711 A, C CUM CUM YYeII ent* l11 x A� e,ev A7e9N rrl..y rr 4 e 4 r A201 e e Application Filed on 4/12/07 City Council Action Should Be Taken By 6/11/07 (60 Days) Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 2007 -009 Applicant: Brooklyn Center Church of the Nazarene Location: 501 73rd Avenue North Request: Special Use Permit/Site and Building Plan Approval The applicant, Pastor Dean Potts on behalf of the Brooklyn Center Church of the Nazarene, is seeking a Special Use Permit and Site and Building Plan approval for a three phase building addition and parking lot expansion for the Church of the Nazarene located at 501 73 Avenue North. The property in question is zoned R -1 (One Family Residence) and is located at the southwest quadrant of T.H. 252 and 73 Avenue North. It is surrounded on the north by 73 Avenue which is the municipal boundary between Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park with single family homes on the opposite side of the street; on the east by T.H. 252; on the south by R -4 (Multiple Residence) zoned property containing the Evergreen Park apartments; and on the west by R -1 zoned property containing single family homes and a city well house. Churches are listed as special uses in the R -1 zoning district. PROPOSAL The applicant proposes to do the above mentioned additions and alterations in three phases. (See the written narrative provided by Pastor Potts, attached.) Phase I includes a substantial expansion to the east, west and south sides of the existing parking lot. The parking lot would still be to the back side of the church and would be expanded to within 5 ft. of the south property line, 15 ft. of the west property line, and 15 ft. of the T.H. 252 right of way, which are all the minimum required property line setbacks in these cases. They also plan to alter the current drop off area on the east side of the church by removing the existing canopy and drop off area while making a relatively small addition (1,047 sq. ft.) to the southeast corner of the building to accommodate an expanded sanctuary and a new foyer. Also to be added at this time would be a new canopy over a revised drop off area and an unfinished second floor addition. The Phase I plan will provide a new dry pond area at the northwest corner of the site to accommodate and control water run off from the expanded parking lot and proposed three phase building expansions. Phase II would involve an L- shaped addition at the southeast corner of the church along with parking lot alterations, sidewalk expansions and finishing of spaces in the second story addition. Twenty five new parking spaces would be provided on the west side of the building along both sides of the access drive from 73 Avenue North. A reconfigured drive up /drop off area would also be accomplished under this phase. 4 -26 -07 Page 1 Phase III would include a courtyard and foyer addition at the northeast and southwest corners of the building respectively and expansion of the sanctuary. ACCESS/PARKING Access to the site is unchanged and is provided by a single curb break off 73 Avenue North, west of the existing location of the church building. The parking requirement for a church is based on its seating capacity. The final expansion of the church would have a seating capacity of 350 seats, requiring a total of 117 parking spaces. Interim expansion has a maximum seating capacity of 300 seats, requiring 100 parking spaces. The Phase I parking expansion and reconfiguration will accommodate 120 cars. One hundred thirty four spaces will be provided in the final phase, which exceeds the minimum required for this facility. GRADING/DRAINAGE/UTILITIES The applicant has provided a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan which is being reviewed by the City Engineer. His written comments will be attached for the Commission's review. A ponding area sized to accommodate the full expansion of the church will be constructed during the Phase I expansion. Storm sewer will be provided to capture drainage to be conveyed to the ponding area and then discharged into the public storm sewer system. B -612 curb and gutter is required around all parking and driving areas. The church serves as an informal Metro Transit Park and Ride facility during off peak church hours. The expanded parking facility will accommodate additional Park and Ride users and the site will be connected in the future to the bus shelter adjacent to T.H. 252 by the sidewalk. Approval of this application should acknowledge the Park and Ride arrangement between the church and Metro Transit based on an off peak use of the property. LANDSCAPING /SCREENING The applicant has proposed two provide some landscaping on the site in conjunction with his required site and building plan submittal. There are a few deciduous trees and shrubs on the site, some of which will have to be removed for construction. The applicant has been provided with the landscape point system used by the Planning Commission for evaluating landscape plans. It should be noted that the landscape point system does not address church facilities or schools, so we really have no evaluation criteria. We have suggested the service /office category as a guideline for evaluating this landscape plan. Screening is also required where parking lots of six or more vehicles abut residentially zoned property. A 15 ft. green strip is required where this property abuts R -1 and is provided. No buffer distance is required where the church property abuts with the apartment complex to the south. The parking lot screening standard requires effective screening from abutting residential lots by a solid opaque fence or wall 6 ft. high or such other device as may be approved by the City Council. The City Council has approved Page 2 i landscape screening in the past that will meet the 6 ft. opaque standard. The site in question is 2.28 acres which, if it were a service /office use would require 220 landscape points. Their plan indicates two new Hackberry trees, to be placed along the northwest green strip: four new Norway Spruce west of the retention pond; nine new shrubs planted 6 ft. apart, west of the new parking lot; ten new shrubs planted 6 ft. apart in the two island delineation areas in the parking lot, and 23 shrubs along the south property line east of an existing 6 ft. high wood fence. There appears to be three existing deciduous trees on the site that will be saved. This appears to be a total point value of 85 points, given the landscape point system. The Commission must determine two things: 1. Is this sufficient landscaping to meet the requirement of a landscape plan? And 2. Is the screening sufficient to recommend the screening plan to the City Council as being adequate to meet the standards of the ordinance? Screening is required along the west side and south side of the newly expanded parking lot. It should be pointed out that there is an existing 6 ft. high wooden fence that meanders along the property line between the Church of the Nazarene and the apartment complex to the south. The apartment complex also had screening requirements where it abuts with the R -1 zoned church property. It is believed that this fence is for screening purposes between the two uses, however, it does not screen the entire width of the lot nor would it provide screening for the expanded parking area. Again, the applicant proposes to fill this area in with shrubs planted 6 ft. apart to meet their screening obligation. Along the west property line are three existing single family homes and a city well house which has the appearance of a single family home. Again, screening is required along this area because of the abutting parking lot. We have advised the applicant that we do not believe it is mandatory to screen the parking lot from the city's well house, however, the balance of the residential property should be provided with screening that is considered appropriate for this area. BUILDING The applicant has provided building elevations showing the east and north building elevations for the church in its final stage. They plan to have five inch vinyl siding with an aluminum covered trim board around the perimeter of the building and a shingled roof. Floor plans and building sections have also been provided showing the expanded sanctuary area, foyer, classrooms, offices, restrooms and kitchen areas for the revised facility. LIGHTING /TRASH The applicant has submitted a lighting plan showing foot candles at various locations surrounding the site. The plan shows seven light standards surrounding the new parking facility on the south side of the church and one light standard at the entrance. The lighting plan shows foot candles to be within the range of authorized lighting in residential areas. Section 35 -712 of the City Ordinances requires that all exterior lighting shall be provided with lenses, reflectors or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the property of the owner or Page 3 operator of the illumination devices. Rays of light shall not pass beyond the property lines of the premises at an intensity greater than 3 ft. candles measured at property lines abutting residentially zoned property. No glare shall emanate from or be visible beyond the boundaries of the illuminated premises. The applicant provides a note on the plan indicating that fixtures are "forward throw with sharp cut off lights at required locations such that lighting levels will be zero at lot lines The plan indicates no outside trash facilities. It is assumed that any trash will be contained within the building. If this is not the case, the applicant should provide a location for trash and an appropriate screening device compatible with the building to screen the trash containers from public view. SPECIAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS As indicated previously, the church is a special use in the R -1 zoning district and is subject to the standards for special use permits contained in Section 35 -220 of the City Ordinances (copy attached). These standards for special use permits require that the proposed special use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and not be detrimental to or endanger the health and safety of the public; not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate neighborhood, nor substantially diminish or impair property values; not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding property; be designed so as to minimize traffic congestion on the public streets; and conform with the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. We would comment that the expansion of the Brooklyn Center Church of the Nazarene would not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. Furthermore, it is believed that this expansion will not be injurious to other property in the immediate vicinity nor will it diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Adequate measures have been taken to provide property ingress and egress and the parking on the site is adequate for the uses provided and the use of the parking lot facility at off peak times from the church use as a Park and Ride facility is appropriate and should be encouraged. We also do not see traffic congestion on public streets to be created with this expansion. There are matters that need to be worked out with respect to the adequacy of the proposed landscaping and screening plan. These do not seem to be insurmountable and once satisfied, it can be determined that the proposal meets the standards for special use permits contained in the City's Zoning Ordinance and can be recommended for approval. A public hearing has been scheduled with respect to this special use permit and notices have been sent to surrounding property owners. RECOMMENDATION Page 4 Approval of this application is recommended subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 5. B612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 6. An as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines shall be submitted to the City Engineering Department. 7. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center's current standards specifications and details. 8. The applicant shall provide appropriate erosion and sediment control devices on site during construction as approved by the City Engineering Department and shall obtain an NPDES construction site erosion control permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. 9. A special use permit is granted to the Brooklyn Center Church of the Nazarene to expand the church in the proposed three phase development and to provide for a Metro Transit Park and Ride facility as comprehended by these plans. Any expansion or alteration of this site, not comprehended by the zoning ordinance or by these approved plans shall not be authorized and would be subject to an amendment to the special use permit. 10. The special use permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances and regulations. Any violations thereof could be grounds for revocation. 11. The plans shall be modified in such a manner to bring the landscaping and screening plans into compliance with city requirements or the landscape plans and screening plans are recommended to be in compliance with the provisions of the zoning ordinance for these two matters. Page 5 i aoV 0 H Mrs 1 ,�iEi�3��� ■1� Iii \1 ���EE III ad ll ROOM ■//1111 mill oil r�rr1�■ C �i /11 '`r ■111111111�� X11 111 i 1�� �1►�� rt /IIIIIIIrI11 /1� �b,.�.:.- ��r�m�iw iq E ��IQ���a�r�� ■111 /1 /1 /ti r1 /1 �EIE /11 /Ilr 111 ■r� /M /1■ /1111 1 �IE��Sm ■ice rA11i�7���r�711r 11 MINION ■Ii rr /111111 �J�i►= T T ,,r r'� QI1111/ LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 1 Pf, http: /gis.logis.org/LOGIS ArcIMS/ ims? ServiceName= bc_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersio... 4/19/2007 City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community MEMORANDUM DATE: April 24, 2007 TO: Ron Warren, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Todd Blomstrom, Director of Public Works fO SUBJECT: Preliminary Site Plan Review Planning Commission Applications 2007 -009 Church of Nazarene Public Works Department staff reviewed the following preliminary documents submitted for review under Planning Commission Application 2007 -009 for the proposed building and parking lot expansion at the Church of Nazarene. Sheet C1: ALTA/ACSM Survey, dated March 29, 2007 Sheet C2: Removal and Dimension Plan, Not dated Sheet C3: Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, Not dated The applicant is proposing to develop property consisting of Lot 1, Block 1, Nazarene Addition Plat 2. This site is located at 50173 d Avenue North. Public Works staff recommends that the following conditions of approval be adopted by the Planning Commission and City Council for Planning Commission Application 2007 -009. 1. SITE LAYOUT The Removal and Dimension Plan provides layouts for a proposed two phase expansion of the building and parking lot. A majority of the parking lot expansion is proposed with the first phase. The applicant is proposing to maintain the existing site access onto 73 Avenue North. A median opening and short left turn lane along 73 Avenue is provided for the existing site access. A majority of the traffic generated with the proposed building and parking lot expansion is projected to follow a travel route from Highway 252 to 73 Avenue. A. Parking lot spaces and drive lane dimensions shall comply with the minimum design standards provided in City Ordinance Section 35 -702. 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 (763) 569 -3400 City Hall TDD Number (763) 569 -3300 FAX (763) 569 -3434 Page 1 of 3 FAX (763) 569 -3494 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org B. The applicant shall construction concrete curb and gutter along the perimeter of all driveways, parking lots, parking spaces and paved driving surfaces that are constructed during each phase of expansion. Curb and gutter shall be constructed in accordance with the dimensions of Type B -618 or B -612 as per City design standards. C. Parking and driveway areas shall be paved with bituminous or concrete pavement prior to being placed into use for parking of vehicles. D. The applicant shall obtain all necessary right -of -way permits from the Minnesota Department of Transportation for the proposed sidewalk extension into the Mn/DOT right -of -way. 2. PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES The existing water service to the building is supplied from a 6 -inch diameter water main along 73` Avenue North. The existing sanitary sewer service to the building is supplied from an 8 -inch diameter sanitary sewer main along Camden Avenue. The sewer service for the church building currently extends through private property located at 7242 Camden Avenue. A. The applicant shall provide the City with a copy of the easement for the sanitary sewer extending through 7242 Camden Avenue. If a utility easement does not existing for the portion of the sanitary sewer service extending through 7242 Camden Avenue, the applicant shall acquire an easement for this service prior to issuance of a building permit for this project or relocate the sanitary sewer service though the church owned property located at 7236 Camden Avenue. B. The applicant shall verify that the existing water and sewer services will provide sufficient capacity to serve the proposed building expansion. C. The applicant is proposing to construct a storm water detention basin over the top of the existing sanitary sewer service for the church building. The grading plan shall be amended to maintain a minimum of 2 feet of ground cover over the sanitary sewer service. The site plans shall be amended to specify that the sanitary sewer service shall be thoroughly insulated along all pipe segments with less than six feet of ground cover. D. The Applicant shall be responsible for coordinating site development plans with Xcel Energy, CenterPoint Energy, Qwest Communications and other private utility companies. 4. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL The applicant is proposing a combination of storm drainage pipes and construction of a storm water detention pond to manage surface water runoff for the site. The proposed storm water pond is located within the City's Drinking Water Supply Management Area. The proposed pond is also located within 200 feet City Municipal Water Supply Well No. 6. City staff has notified the applicant's engineer that a wet (permanent pool) type pond would not be an appropriate application for this site due to potential contamination of the groundwater aquifer immediately adjacent to Well No. 6. The applicant has also notified staff that future site uses may Page 2 of 3 include outside activities with young children. Staff is therefore recommending that the pond be designed to prevent long -term standing water and higher rates of infiltration. A. Grading limits shall remain within the property boundary unless formal arrangements have been made with adjacent property owners. B. The Grading Plan shall be amended to show an emergency overflow route for the stormwater pond to an adjacent public street or the ditch along Highway 252. The emergency overflow path shall be a minimum of two feet below the finished floor elevation of all adjacent buildings. C. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the City of Brooklyn Park for connection into the storm sewer system along the north side of 73` Avenue prior to issuance of a building permit. D. The site plans shall be modified to include an outlet control structure along the side slope of the pond that will provide direct drainage of the pond to the bottom ground elevation. The grading plan shall be amended to include drain tile under the full length of the pond to intercept infiltration and discharge to the down stream storm sewer. E. The applicant shall meet with Public Works staff to consider alternative pond outlet designs, which may allow connection to the storm sewer along the south side of 73` Avenue based on the requirements of Item D above. This modification may eliminate the need for open trench construction across 73` Avenue and obtaining a permit from the City of Brooklyn Park. F. The site grading plan shall be amended to provide maximum side slopes along the pond of 3:1 (H: V). G. The property owner of the proposed development shall enter into an Agreement for Maintenance and Inspection of Utility and Storm Drainage Systems with the City of Brooklyn Center to insure the continued maintenance of on -site utilities and storm water facilities. H. The applicant shall provide a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan with the documents submitted for the building permit application. The above comments are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Subsequent approval of the final plat and site plans may require additional modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of the water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, final grading and geometric design as established by the City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans. Page 3 of 3 Brooklyn Center Church of the Nazarene Building Plan. 2007 Phase 1. The parking lot will be expanded from its current capacity of 33 cars to a total of 120 stalls. Of this total, 8 stalls will be gained on the east side of the building due to the removal of the east side entrance canopy. This area will no longer be designated as a fire lane. A drive thru lane will be constructed along the south side of the current curb and a portion of the new addition will cover this lane for a covered drop -off area. Five handicapped parking slots will be designated (currently there are none). A dry pond will be constructed to the west which will hold the peak flow from a 100 year storm of 24 hr duration. The bottom of the pond will have water tolerant grasses and flowers and will be drained by a series of drain tiles located about 1 ft below the surface. These tiles will drain into a header system that drains into the storm sewer system at a slow, controlled rate. The pond is sized to handle the runoff from phase 1 hard surface areas and all the additional areas shown in the final phase. The building changes during the first phase will be as follows in priority order: Add a second unfinished floor over the flat roofed fellowship and classroom area and put a pitched roof over the top of it. This is to address the current roof leaking problems and at the same time provide a possibility for future expansion. As part of this process, the current flat roof will have a beam and supports added so that the roof will handle future floor loads with better than required deflection allowances. The sanctuary roof will also be covered over by a straight pitched roof to match the rest of the building. The area above the current roof and below the new roof will provide space for bat insulation and, in the future, air conditioning and heating ductwork. To the south of the existing sanctuary a new foyer will be added using 56 ft long trusses running north and south. The ridge line will run east -west and %Z of the area under the trusses will be enclosed to form a new foyer and entrance into the new sanctuary. The area that is not enclosed will form a covered drop -off area. The changes inside the existing classroom and sanctuary areas will include; a) creation of a handicapped accessible toilet facility from an existing room that was once the main toilet facility for the building in 1968. No major plumbing changes are required but the door entrance would need to be widened. b) dividing an existing room into two rooms, one for table and chair storage, one for classroom space. c) dividing an exiting room into a hallway and office and moving an existing doorway on the sanctuary wall to align with the hallway. d) removing side rooms from the sanctuary platform and widening it. This will provide room to put the piano and organ on the platform instead of on the sanctuary floor level. e) removing the dividing wall between sanctuary and foyer and expanding the sanctuary space. f) changing the main entrance location from the east side to the south side of the building. f) changing an existing office space into a corridor from the new foyer area to the classroom and fellowship hall area of the building. Future Expansion Plans, Phase 2. Building changes: An addition to the 39 x 56 ft foyer area will be made converting it to a 56 x 80 sanctuary and foyer area. Seating capacity is expected to be about 250. The current sanctuary will be converted to a multi purpose area and new classrooms, toilet facilities and offices will be completed in the upper floor above the current fellowship /educational room. As a result of the new sanctuary expansion, the parking lot on the east side of the building will be cut off and the northeast portion will be turned back to grass. Parking Lot changes: Two new rows of parking (25 spaces) will be added alongside the entrance driveway. The existing asphalt on the oldest part of the lot will be removed and the lot will be regraded and paved. New sidewalks and curbs for a new curving drive past the south side of the building will be installed. Sidewalks alongside the new sanctuary and to the bus stop will be completed. Future Expansion Plans, Phase 3. Building changes: The final stage will only affect the building. The foyer in the sanctuary will be removed and a new foyer built to the south of the educational wing. This will allow the seating capacity to be increased to 350. This is deemed to be the practical maximum for this acreage. In addition, a new garden and patio area will be installed in the northeast corner of the property which will be a part of the final beautification effort. z 7 ru �R S 9 Q� A R F RY .b BPERO 1ST Ai )ITIOH e u °4 33 R N M ul S R S oil p i 4 A 1 3 rs. ML .s MY. No. on �011111�T11TI ®Tes lm��.p•.�• Y fill iq_ N D D Call 46 Hours before tliggMq PHASE 1 FINAL PHASE G�HER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities t Ar 657 -{5{ -0002 MN. TO Free i -800- 252 -1166 T 18' CP 75 CP 7� O 2R6 Ai i \C ITY OF BROOKLYN PARK \C 7 6ROOKLYN PARK n-�+ CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER .,I Y OF ©ROOKL.N f; ENTER 35.00 46.94 1 34 W 1 �`r- LL 2L' W `f Iy,A 7'44 F ONC N1t.S9� 3 4 F_ 0 30 80 f2 P 28 4 C 94 7 y 2 SCALE IN FEET io ELEC7� I 6lAE ONE STORY BUILDING t 11O ONE STORY BUILDING I EtEC. CHURCH GF NAZARENE IST M EL MR.N TOM AT IN MNOMIT CHUB H C NAZARENE I _..-.,...1101 )F0 AVE K GIOFN AVE R 1 AT IE OF RE SOi 051 T1F0 STBUILDING PAT Ai I— uREN1 AVE K I .511 IBM .90 aaD Lot L Rack L NAZARENE I ZARE AN N PLAT e. NITNTNpYN Canty, EXCEPT BU5' 1 ttg poN't RltoTn AR Pkurxl 3u1 a0 sTn non �t- oi- var�Pla4wnaroruportamn 8 76001 cl I 3 AREA 99,176 SF f22R AC.) J j 63 z 78 1 t m O TOTAL. PHIS AREA OVER SP X X.) i IUTAL AREA DT HARDCOVER W X I 3 i g -H a1 f� a f w i�+' •�B +aoo I �T� MsuTES Ma LI xT rarro p O191E2 OM L6E 9 y O k I MaaTCS Mk6ERrr LINE G I I ,off 4 E W i3 r, 7XwTES m:cTmR TILE 6JUTES &GARB 6 FEET MART 335.43 HERS, 335,14 PLAT 335.43 MEAS, 335.14 PLAT Q BvarEi MRMAr SPRIXE 6.00 TIP. `GNGTE01G1lET GIN TRAFTm RiECT. PHASE 1 LEGENDS: PHASE 2 LSGENDS: PHA 3 LEGENDS: NEW PAVEMENT NEW PAVEMENT FOYER. COURTYARD E 11 NEW ADDITION PHA.9E 1 NOTES NEW ADDITION PHASE 2 NOTES POND MUMRRR of NTGr lARKYq STALLS ffi SIDEWALKS MUMIRR ar RTwnNG PARKING fTALLT •MAw 1- ffi NURSER OF RESiIIVEO PARKING STAIN ffi WRONG Of IAN PARKING STALLS PHASE 3S REMOVAL TOTAL KING M OF PARKING GTAL 1ffi REMOVAL TOTAL MMRIRI OF PARKING STALLS 136 TOTAL KGRRER Of PARKING GTAWI RRGYIRlP 100 TOTAL MANAGER OF PARKING STALLS MM 1m i; "BO W ym6 Ba0nad M4mc pohc %LN 55426.1'1 O Ph 1761/ 5ai2WO Emil W m lAr ws KRNT RES MKpMGG sr kE a MOlx Mr oF[c Np JOR NAME CHURCH OF NA7NiE1E I DRAWN 6Y: AK I PROJ. N0. EDS 6 ,`a Alp MAT 1 AM A OLLY MCENMO lN0 flIRtE7TR IMOR iNE UNS K TIE STATE 6 WMmTA C Fm (%3045-2111)1 Web Si h IL!'_' I oATFO: Di PLAN LOCATION: 501 73RD AVE NORTH 0 E t I; H: 121 1) F: h ti l' EL t' r: 1' I :V I CHECKED BY: KAGAM SNIPER PL NIL >s70 BROOKLYN CflOER, W 55616 VS I SHEET NO. C2 r 651 FINAL PHASE Call H A ea 851 5 Ci PHASE 1 GOPHER STATE ONE GAS Twin r-0002 Ir MN. Toll dl F A Free 1 -600- 22 454-51 52 -1188 �cv'_ r ITY C BRO 15 CP Is CP CITYOOKLYN PARK Y OKLYN PARK rcr>^ rc -Cl OF BROOKLYN CENTERS CITY OF BROOK CEN TERC� ry Rf.P 1 RCP RCP 0 '28 4 6.94 �-E +:G E. 4 Bill aosaz JaOD I' 1L� 116.94 Y NA4'aa•E Conc swx 58 6 33'45•E 30 e0 AI 11A1 I. LAT I.00 PLAT c 10 2 10 SCALE IN FEET EIEC IEli d �O ElE .E.: ONE STORY BUILDING I ONE STORY B C M 01,14 TOM AT IN GJAOANT Q1° CHURCH OF NAZARENE I CHURCH OF NAZARENE IST EL I O'rim5ECT11 73RD AVE N S CANDOI AVE N M M AT NE a PE s f y Fl. OeYS TV Or p0.1 50l TRO STORY BUILDING Lm AT 7= cwlooEx AvE, N. f I rsc- esl.so z ITC -asl.x m• 6apl e I I xol a6o l r, p Lot L Mock L NAZARENE ADDITION PLAT I E, NmnePln CorNty. K E %CEPT 5 3090 Ex. BUS tlrt part ahoaT, OR Po 1 5A M 5 l STA noN MYRNOQU of T- 0 RlDhtroP Flat Moftmd E7 -W- �y CQ it 8 3 J 2 tE 1 t I 6 3.83 Q Z AREA OF a9d76 SF f228 AC.) 4 9.00 n. a" I Y I I L 5 TOTAL AREA 6 HARDCOVER 58 0.3E AC,) 2 �t a 1 s a7 6.' l i 24.00 -.s NI]N1ApI1 SET FplNp INN ITE2 NO LM M I ry maTES y Luc ION JI I I f I I I I I I I �}f 9 N to I I I I I I I I I `III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 10 DENOTES SIW MAR K 6 IFFY T 335.43 MEAS. 335.14 PLAT 1 335.43 NEAS, 335.14 PLAT DENOTES NOIMAr SPrKE 6.00 TTP. rTUlES6tOUm OIRDEN TRAFFN pOECTON PHA38 1 IEGENDS: PHA 2 LEGENDS: PHASE 3 LEGENDS: PAVEIffNT R E NEW at PAVEIIBM FOY. COUMARD f M N A R Y NEW ADDMON NEW ADDITION FOR CITY R E V I E W PHASE 1 NOTES PHASE 2 NOTES POND Nunn or NEW PANMMNG prALU- 1b SIDEWALKS NUNEER O f EI M P ARKMq ST PIIAeE 1- 96 NM OF REOrRIP PAMIRS 6rALLS. m NMrEER OF MR, PARRINI, STILLER PNAY i 1 REMOVAL TO Nur°RR OP PARNNK1 6TA +m REMOVAL TOTAL NM M PARNwO OTALLS 161 TOTAL NYYRRR OF FARMING WrAIL's REQUIRED- tap TOTAL NMI OF PARKING RTALL1 Rftlnl D- in Elas 1 6180 W yma Boukv rd. k*mw bs. MN 55526.1710 I NvNSr LvNRT nur TIa aAntT rAS wowm pT ME a uon NT O[cr RNePRRar, C FhaM: (76T) sas28DO F OB NAME: CHURCH OF K4Z4R INi:,:�r�.irll�._r: co nur N AN A wLr uDEnae wo Rn1aOA ram nNE uws s nN srATE v 111101114=& Wq r J D[ DRAWN BY: AN PROD. NO. EDS 6 IiL11LLLttt C F- (763) 515.2601 Web Ste hi1_nt.mn IAVNn' P<� LOCATION: 501 73RD AVE NORTH 0 v (U 1 TI k: E I2 I C, F:!i 7V h. ti C' 1( li 7' I �I NAppIN G Pa Na 76NK{ BROOKLYN CENTER W 63414 1 CHECKED BY: VS SHEET NO. C2 ISSUED�R I Luminoire Schedule I [3— NeATwN PwNlr ❑EOUNwnw coraTRUClIOx I Symbol 1 Qty I Label I Arrangement I Lumens I LLF Description 1 ❑mow %LT I 1 8 1 55 I SIN(SLE 1 56000 10.5b5 1 Llthonla #CAD 400M SR5 S5c50 1 pn, aim cmoll 9pe0i 1 4 1 5A 1 51N6LE 1 56000 1 0.585 1 Llthonla WAD 400M 5R45G -55550 1 I 1 SA2 I DI80 1 56000 10.565 1 Llthonla #CAD 400M SR490 -55550 1 Numeric Summary I Label I GalcType I Units 1 Avg 1 Max 1 Min 1 Avg/Min 1 Mox/Min I Parking Arco-Top Illuminance I Fc 1 2.55 14.1 10.4 1 5.83 1 1025 1 -CE 41F518I= FAY 41F326 -19N •'EBSIE IYI im Y mn K V 18' RCP i6 RCP CITY OF BRO PARK 73RD AVE. N. A¢cRREn IIEUwrEm.,w CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER pe'D aauL i 6' CIP Ma+9 BRUCE HOMM MA NpIRE[i M,U NIL.M AN 60 MC o PRBIECi YAWGER e1M SEBZ II l i ,D I I CHUR NA2A NE E j'. Q B .S 1 7 Q R 'fG OF O�'IF. TORY lJtl9TND GNIOIY I I ELEC. /(FUTURE SECOND FLOOR, I °A° /ADDITION THIS AREA) I j EA EA A 77 a7 sF/ PROPOSE' AooaN wm'ie W Z ONE STO W v f. B: j DO y A PRO.LLT)� O UM 6 D N� z n N IJ I L e. a N v I _j Y W LLJV 7238 I I s. a a, a v e v v O I,_ LLI FS rc E 0 k. I'Wli o a L I 3 UO� m R -1 I t. 1 i u v w. a f. a s. u w, a. 7230 ht I -I�I�t ILI -.1y III�� 134 ►ARWN! e1AG'd NaMI `LKMrtINef PATTB4N MXTBIle ARB! II! roTAL R1111R.! elI.TND M eAMGNMY sea PGI.IN.Im T AT L 4 WTN sNAw cVr PA1eCRM RNTa POR MLIE! MATINS 3b1 J/ I.LD!® LOLATILW XYA1 TNT L FAL Le WLLK AT I LINm. META MALBX I.MTS nYPILAU. CXISTMS e' NLlll WCCA Rea[ 40 M01 fui[ THREE STORY BUILDING LIGNtING SITE PLAN EVERGREEN PARK MANOR APARTMENT, R -4 �a 061349 �j A1.2 r ISSUED I F �-Iw MIMI a y 4'j 77 NOWAX fe aYlwaplf. T f fl4rc awo�1 6N. IOdC `"1 vlMl SDIN9(M) 6LJ.. IM'a Ett P Nlt(SR IN /dLHR1�1 LWI:I® ♦SSOtulf 1RM DpAIm PRWECI WtWdR D1N SF12 I -Al.la NORTH ELEVATION I -Ab.14 I -Al.l� 3 -A6.1 „lens• M� Z ow i Z 2 Q nnmq� e.n.. 3r -io• (.F) s owrar' c}ros F W W LL S April 13, =01 °Y°0 e•vmr�emme mrl iaunu+cwe® nn Goat nw eornv OeN �ofu«CO.1x oecorAmT coHCiele einac 2 -A6.1 �(f I WEST ELEVATION 3 -A6.1 Ve• iw• ni r.aw,r a oMm .oiaa. ..nu, mRee+r a nc ,c.,mr mmnr 061349 A4.2 F ISSUEDI DFOUN611pN PEgYR OILY m �11axMM I -A6.1 ❑P„LL PEM., al1EY ..rm.. 1 ❑PULL ca+smucllan I o. PRL'Nl Of 181 rawer 94•MMUYtl I ��P1ILTLLL d' W6111N �JJ I J Ylt1n1EM HOLM PRJJECi N1W {R OW $EIIZ l011C1L/pIL� It(11D G!AlRN LIIC OLURN CPT[ OCCORATIJ! GGIOIQI! R.G•.IC CQlt!! LOi -01 -A6.1 NORTH ELEVATION I -A7.1 ua•. 3 -A6.1 1 -AI.l OlLOM O' HOAR C.aneoN MtlOB) I c Inwer Z Y i s mUORm Aprll 13. 3001 r I�3 -A6.1 EAST ELEVATION �2-A(o.l y w'•1 1 -0' M.IYGFKM .IIIId 601®1! R IllxlllEp W 1IOI !GY[ M 0.�1EL 1,'061349 �j A4.1 or ISSUED. 01'OONMI REW1R SLY �a eq uawwC ❑iWNMTpH LONlIRU y e 1.�s1e ❑lOMMi lILOIM2 dlLY 11mie ❑NLL PFA1If ORLV PXS� ❑NLL WNSIRIILIIOp MULE 4f!-l3 IM 1. Ill- 148 -t!!! Vb MS MILHREtt IF1111 RLn. IA BSIK 01110 fA4p1 —M !KALE W—L .UtCHIRM MID ME m m SSOSER rR02tt YvNLFR !WI SFIfZ .MLK 1NI!!C 124' OL. 1W.lp b' OG 12' w1 M91ATd1 •w1RM6 ���L��L� !LplOIE 110!4!1! 2M6 AID p4LL ff W 1 U.Y wn 4UILA110N e NeY Z s V2' wn Muwnal cormec� rc U Z w ae 144 24• oL. laV k J k CGIiE. NORIEdfK 2X4 llRmBR1B s v!• ra iM a Y Q' W s I? sno eHRl11s w LN.IIip HNLL N.Ols oaltn! p Or n 1a2�e 14/10NRY rwi 3E a /y WLL�25 assurzr nneeR! W U O R NLL f@tlJm M 1 /117148 lWNDMM 1MN Yl1CL'1'1 ApMl 11, 7007 0 00110. YM raaY uaee pw ar) I r twat s• ewvn wss etc. ai Data ROO1r ref roorrlol eLOa >K .ma o2m! a >K Mw1m a m�1Lr 1 ,'061349 BUILDING SECTION I a A6.2 N II r z L) ,r, I S� I I I I I LJ iI I I I 1Ll1L11� I I I 17 I I I L1J I I I gp I I I I II I I I v II ®r•'J F s RP I I L1J F I rll I L�J I I I I I I r I Nit r 1 I I I -J Ell I 1 I y 11 1 ®1 y i �L— Y I I y_.. Lf--------- _J I I g A I a 3 4 0 11111 In oc =Io H g a YYYYYYY 4YYYYY YYaYY Co El Y uua��'ym �mm Y �ae� L L 0 SB�btl 0 rn ADDITION k ALTERATIONS FOR: BROOKLYN 3 E I Cn CENTER CHURCH OF THE NAZARENES m app n Y CL� 0 501 73RD STREET NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55444 t 1 rr+irr INS 3 15 I� Nil Ell All Nil -4 fpl J W Z _j I 0 XjxXjjX1 W ADDITION ALTERATIONS FOR: A A BROOKLYN lim'-pi 1 Will 11 CENTER CHURCH P. OF 73RD THE N NORTH AZARENE TIN (D P. 501 STREET I --t BROOKLYN CENTER. MN 554" fit ARM,M3 ISSUEDNR o� ae 141 ❑NUNO„IOH REIM ONLY w m ❑NUNMTDM WAIMN: y i I ❑NLL VFMMf IXLLY i PAE -0MYINDMKf 9 p p }I'$ y p� y f X. Ar3LRd36 f it wou raopx uw /90C1l9 MI1111t0 qJS'� OFfICE 119- 5�b18!! MNl3 AT ARGED. fAC 119- 5X-19N i M 3Efl511E I.II�AdnWi.Om ATfIL YACG LAM AMLIB �1/ GOR NRIS AT1 i G1.I0d1�1 CLA99YOOM 4 GJYObOM PHINC9N5 LLIIKR�M DfY A 4 L/L MAX IACNRfCi I(1N1 iF1TY..W LAl1NYAtl 854E 9U1R CL�L d'Y A9Ez GRM IEMdI, AM RY.KRb MCMfECf DMD AUWL MI 90'3 AT Y•WL V. 11.1E VAT! AID ASSRsm VA MRl VY 31lATMW t PAtlIECT WWVEP 9W SFIEZ AID NIIfL 3DRI3. MHLG9lIRP MM.L M.'UIVYY' 11M.L KITGBI RSA 1141 MOVE EA3TR0 BUILDINCx SECTION o2 �Lj Vs• ra Mar wacD W lA!!P! AT za uc Z D UW a tlD9 YDOG Q4 Q h JUZW W =N� o i !!MIRY M,LL !RY YYLL 0 O Z R2MUMD MMl c1 ooM F w LL a moos- IOIIbRD p CRY ICl MOINERM M41 J Y k M^R 17. 3007 snDMAtL Gg3TRY DWTIM 093TRY .S M RR... A.R AR q.�lew,oq 1e1.a�LM9. M.fl cLA39ROOM MD•R>T DM�L. 0 lag cau« Im11 ee/RS J I I P. 6N. 100•C AID noTd33 TD 1161K.0 1',061349 LOAgN3 BUILDINCs SECTION I v A6.1 ISSUED— ❑POUNa,aN RFAIIR aar Y-o'o awls I-A�.I ewsrne xwx+ ❑fwMarpNCOrR, mLy wncx wr n' cc vwux ❑eoor,o mooiNa oN�r I p RFAYIf acr o.k f1A1 WNSIRULTIIXI _L IIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111 n� zaee wTrcnc J F iiiiili� 2 -,6 ;i mw, IN AtMM I TZi -r 1! 1 1 1 1 1 1 r� r a,�lEwrm.,,�E.,•Mr�. T 11 i' "iii��' r� i i i i i i i i i i i i i OdG!'RAR.RNB i 4 wr =Z I -A6.1 I I I I I I I i l l l l l l l l w sa r+4 w i D N z L' F Z2Qffz 111111 111111 I- UZ 0 z o 0Hr F �LJLL moo n25 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I °s m 3 Ab.1 A I I T I I I I 4 I I 3 -A6.1 I k "I 12, Ti r I 3�3 9N'-h 13V 1/Y IT-1 by C4 VY h-Y-3 9/1' M PwYg1Y 0f tm' mr rN.laT. Nrc ms ROOF FRAMING PLAN M w.1w N ro au[ J.'061349 �j A8.1 City of Brooklyn Center Special Use Permits Section 35 -220 2. Standards for Special Use Permits A special use permit may be granted by the City Council after demonstration by following are met: evidence that all of the a. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort b. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. c. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. d. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress, egress and parking so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. e. The special use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. 3.. Conditions and Restrictions The Planning Commission may recommend and the City Council may impose such conditions and restrictions upon the establishment, location, construction, maintenance and operation of the special use as deemed necessary for the protection of the public interest and to secure compliance with requirements specified in this ordinance. In all cases in which special use permits are granted, the City Council may require such evidence and guarantees as it may deem necessary as part of the conditions stipulated in connection therewith. 4. Resubmission No application for a special use permit which has been denied by the City Council shall be resubmitted for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of the final determination by the City Council; except that the applicant may set forth in writing newly discovered evidence of change of condition upon which he relies to gain the consent of the City Council for resubmission at an earlier time. 5. Revocation and Extension of Special Use Permits When a special use permit has been issued pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance, such permit shall expire without further action by the Planning Commission or the City Council unless the applicant or his assignee or successor commences work upon the subject property within one year of the date the special use permit is granted, or unless before the expiration of the one year period the applicant shall apply for an extension thereof by filling out and submitting to the Secretary of the Planning Commission a "Special Use Permit" application requesting such extension and paying an additional fee in an amount as set forth by the City Council resolution. Special use permits granted pursuant to the provisions of a pr ordinance of Brooklyn Center shall expire within one year of the effective date of this ordinance if construction upon the subject property pursuant to such special use permit has not commenced within that time. In any instance where an existing and established special use is abandoned for a period of one eyar, the special use permit related thereto shall expire one year following the date of abandonment.