Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-002 HRARMember Rich Theis introduced the following resolution and ::;bved its adoption: HRA RESOLUTION NO. 86°02 RESOLUTION APPROVING APPORTIONMENT OF SURVEY, PLATTING, AND ENGINEERING COSTS WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center (HRA) has entered into an Agreement entitled "Contract for Private Development Among the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center and the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, and Brookdale Three Limited Partnership and Brookdale Corporate Center, a Limited Partnership" dated December 19, 1985; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of such agreement, a Registered Land Survey has been completed and the property which is the subject of such Agreement will be replatted and other engineering work has been undertaken and will be undertaken as set forth in Exhibit AIhereto; and WHEREAS, representatives of the ERA have presented a propos- al apportioning the costs for the work set forth in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the ERA has reviewed the apportionment of costs set forth in Exhibit A and finds that it is appropriate and in furtherance of the Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment District; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelop- ment Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center as follows: 1. The apportionment of costs as set forth in Exhibit A is hereby approved. January 13, 1986, Date Chairman The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Hawes , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and the following voted against the same: Gene Lhotka, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 I co MINNEastractio1 NCSOTAn cO RPOompany OF RATEO January 2, 1986 BROOKDALE CORPORATE CENTER PHASE III Brooklyn Center, Minnesota MEETING MINUTES 86-1-1 Summary of Survey Costs: a) Registered Land Survey - Requirement to transfer title and obtain bonds. Total cost $3,766.00 (apportioned per acre), b) Replat registered land survey into plat. (Apportioned per acre) 1.) Shoot and plat topo on south lot $ 600.00 2.) Prepare proposed plat 800.00 3.) Final plat computations 150.00 4.) Draw final plat 500.00 5.) County checking charge 112.00 6.) Prepare mylars 125.00 7.) Stake lot corners 1,350.00 8.) Square footage of each lot 70.00 TOTAL REPLAT COSTS $3,707.00 c) Legal descriptions of existing easements to be vacated. Cost of description born by party whose land requires such descriptions - 1.) Description of 10' of Earle Brown Drive to be vacated - $75.00 (City cost). d) Legal descriptions of new easements required - 1.) Common access roadway and landscape easement area - $100.00 (City/Ryan split). 2.) Sidewalk and trail easement - $450.00 (City/Ryan split). 3.) Landscape easement at intersection node - $100.00 (City cost). e) Other requested information - 1.) Location of all Earle Brown buildings - $550.00 (City cost). 700 INTERNATIONAL CENTRE, 900 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE 612/339-9847 I HRA Resolution No. 86-02 86-1-2 Breakdown of land areas:. Ryan Phase I 252,855 SF Ryan Phase II 270,582 SF SUBTOTAL 523,437 SF Earle Brown Farm 307,038 SF Southern Parcel 310,818 SF SUBTOTAL 617,856 SF TOTAL 1,141,293 SF a) RLS to be apportioned between Ryan land and Earle Brown Farm area only. Ryan: 523,437 SF / 830,475 SF 63% City: 307,038 SF / 830,475 SF = 31°. b) Replat and site drainage plan apportioned against total areas: s Ryan: 523,437 SF / 1,141,293 SF - 469 I City: 617,856 SF / 1,141,293 SF - 54% 86-1-3 Review of Engineering Proposals:- a) Suburban - Item 2B & 2C $2,500.00 City Cost 2D 3,300.00 Apportioned Cost 2E 4,800.00 Ryan Cost TOTAL b) Westwood - Item 2B 2C 2D 2E TOTAL i $10,600.00 $2,616.00 City Cost 1,646.00 City Cost 2,780.00 Apportioned Cost 2,944.00 Ryan Cost $9,986.00 c) Recommendation - While the Westwood proposal estimates substantially more costs associated with utility relocation and redesign ($4,262.00 versus $2,500.00), their proposal appears to be far more thought out. Based on Westwood's prior relationship with the City as well as difficulty in getting Suburban to commit to costs, Ryan recommends Westwood to provide engineering services on the project. Note that Westwood's proposal contains not to exceed estimates and actual costs could be less. Fr- BRA Resolution No. 86-02 86-1-4 Proposed Apportionment of Costs: TOTAL RY AN CITY a) RLS $3,766.00 (@ 63%) $2,373.00 (@ 37%) $1,393.00 b) Replat 3,707.00 (@ 46%) 1,705.00 (@ 54%) 2,002.00 c) 10' 75.00 (@ 100%) 75.00 Easement Vacation d) Common 550.00 (@- .50%) 275.00 (@ 500) 275.00 Easements e) Landscape 100.00 (@ 100) 100.00 Easement f) Locate Farm 550.00 (@ 100) 550.00 Buildings g) Engineering: Item 2B 2,616.00` - (@ 1000'.) 2,616.00 2C 1,646.00 - (@ 100%) 1,646.00 20 2,780.00 (@ 46%) 1,278.80 (@ 54%) 1,501.20 2E 2,944.00 (@ 100;) 2,944.00 - 8, b 1.). 80 $TU,158. 2(u 86-1-5 Pr eliminary Schedule Info rmation :