Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2002 02-11 CCP Regular Session
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION February 11, 2002 6:00 P.M. West Fire Station Training Room 1. Cliff Hoffman, Deloitte & Touche 2. City Council discussion of agenda items and questions 3. Miscellaneous 4. Adjourn City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community To: Mayor Kragness an ouncil Members Lasman, Nelson, Peppe, and Ricker From: Michael J. McCauley City Manager Date: February 7, 2002 Re: Auditor I asked Cliff Hoffman to have a short discussion with the City Council to update you on the audit and the process that they are using. The auditors have used an informational form this year that they have used in other cities, but not in Brooklyn Center until this year. Since the auditors work directly for the City Council, I thought it would be appropriate for Mr. Hoffman to report to you on the audit and the additions to the process that Deloitte & Touche have instituted. 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall & TDD Number(763) 569-3300 FAX(763) 569-3434 FAX(763) 569-3494 mm sm Mortgages offer: T Smart Co ute o tgages r•o e . t • Low down payments—borrowers need only 3%down payment - { I •A Smart Commute Savings allowance To accountfortbesavingsyou would realize by using public transit,up to$200 will befactored into your x . •�` • • �, monthlyincomefor loan qualificationpurposes. • Up to$2,500 in closing cost k assistance for properties in the 1 f Minneapolis—Empowerment Zone Free transit pass for two years Smart Commute–Mortgage recipients • • will also receive a free transit pass Location. Location. Location. for two years. Over$2,000 in value, • When it comes to real estate,location has always this Smart Commute Mortgage been important.With the Smart Commutes-Mort- benefit provides 24 months of gage,that's never been more true. By choosing a free transportation on any regional property within 1/4 mile of any public transit route bus route in the Twin Cities area. in the seven county Twin Cities metropolitan area, you may qualify for the added benefits of a What's Needed To Qualify? Smart Commute Mortgage. In addition to selecting a home within 1/4 mile of a The Smart Wa To Go public transit route,borrowers will be evaluated on the y following criteria: The Smart Commute Mortgage can help home •credit and income history buyers purchase their dream home. When you •employment history and stability purchase a home near public transit the Smart •debt-to-income ratio calculations Commutes-Mortgage recognizes that you will save on commuting expenses and can therefore have more disposable income to pay your housing expenses. For More Information To learn more about Smart Commutes"'Mortgages A Smart Commutes"'Home gives you great and determine proximity of property locations purchasing power and transportation flexibility to transit routes,visit www.metrocouncil.org because it allows you to utilize transit regularly To apply for a Smart Commutes`"Mortgage,contact: and reduce or even eliminate the expense of TCF Mortgage 612-661-7544 owning and maintaining a vehicle. Irwin Mortgage 952-546-1520 stCOMutel�} MOA 9 ag e t� A National, Regional & Local Partnership 1 IT The Stuart Commute"' Mortgage is a partnership between "` the Metropolitan Council and Fannie Mae,the nation's largest home mortgage financing source.Its purpose is to promote Smart Growth principles of affordable housing and reduced traffic congestion by linking housing choice to public transit. - Loans are available through participating local lenders. e' a•nrs To apply for a Smart Commute" Mortgage, contact: TCF Mortgage 612-661-7544 Irwin Mortgage 952-546-1520 / . 11"BONN �Q it Metropolitan Council r 3 During the 2000 legislative session,the Legislature Bus Rapid Transit(BRT)is a new form of public ; allocated funding to plan and design three new busways in transportation using public road right-of-way and transit , 'k the metropolitan area.The Northwest Corridor(County advantages that combine to provide dependable,high speed Road 81 from North Minneapolis to Rogers)was designated bus service regardless of weather or traffic conditions. b to be home to one of those busways. BRT is fast,convenient,and accessible service that Increased population growth and development in the combines the amenities of rail-like transit with the northwestern suburbs has resulted in traffic congestion convenience of local bus service.BRT features real-time p along County Road 81,highlighting opportunities to messaging that alerts passengers to actual arrival and improve the area's transportation system.High quality departure times and traffic signal priority,providing An example of an enclosed BRT stop. transit also will strengthen the Corridor's vitality by commuters with a sense of reliability. The status bar(shown at top)alerts passengers ® • • increasing mobility,critical to the area's commuter travel BRT supports integrated transit/land use planning to the exact next arrival time. and effective movement of goods and services,such as (zoning,redevelopment,etc.)connecting transit stations to BUS RAPID TRANSIT AMENITIES P efficient ambulance service to North Memorial Medical locations where people live and work.In addition,planned Signal priority for buses Center.Improved transit service will help reduce traffic road upgrades and modern passenger facilities will allow for stations with easy boarding Mode congestion,fuel consumption and pollution,shorten safe stops and fewer turns,resulting in comfortable,efficient rn Limited stops and more frequent service commuting time,and provide people with more choices service. • • in the way they travel. BUS COMPARISONS Coordinated local and express service Bus Rapid Transit BR TYPICAL LOCAL BUS TYPICAL ARTICULATED BUS p (BRT)is an enhanced mode of public 60• Ticket vending machines at stations transportation that can serve the County Road 81 Corridor, — Dedicated bus lanes 9 giving commuters frequent express service supported b Seating Capacity 3R Seating Capacity 20 :5g%LONGER: 9 q P PP Y Passenger Capacity 72 Passenger Capacity ttg AR' HOLDS 66%MORE RI DERS • • • Park-and-ride lots improved local bus routes.Expansion of the current system Real-time schedule information ® • - �will better meet customer needs and promote more sensible h ;— land use development. P ADVANTAGES TO BRT CUSTOMERS Buses receive signal priority at main intersections resulting i shorter travel time and less congestion :ENT TO ROADWAY t User-friendly passenger amenities such as platforms for easier _ DES) p p boarding,u to-the-minute bus arrival information and bike ITHIN MEDIAN P lockers LINE Stations will fit in with planned redevelopment G t f Faster travel times or customers eewa, e aa„„�aa. a �aaaaaa,r� aeFrER pro,„.•�m^`° Quick transfers to and from local routes nr Shorter boarding times for customers ACENTTOROADWAY TIDES) Faster travel times,avoids congestion DTH SIDES) t R, LINE '°°y' ° High-quality facilities for customer convenience xC Gives customers consistently updated arrival and departure , Hubbard Marketplace Is the new Robbinsdale Transit Hub, times ' e. °..a-r ORMNea ea:w.. yea Mk °°°°� serving local routes and eventually BRT, i[features indoor ~' IDe� waiting area and rest rooms. For more information contact Tom Johnson,N.W Partnership at 612-344-1400. • 4 r s Land Ilse Planning � - • . � • • � �,�� � ,�� and Development OWN VMS • .____ ,.110 IIA ►-- R ice` • �• •• ii �1 `'� =� w 1�1`4� � \/�L•Lu..-_- - INN v� .. - ��� �M�"ii:ai• 94 - •I aOv ��IIt ■!i■���^,��•.��.�Is� 1�� � • 111 � F W1:11.�� ��� �� �'��'�®�e_�_r���ii''• � �` •�1� � 1�1■II �b. - -� .♦ • ' - + • ��•' 11 1®III/F�111 �1l2 �. ' I •1'1 1 .1F1 11���IPl1®! � 11 Illl�A�� lt,., _ � � 11�- ;�1�i i I f+llt��'��•i;�\` ' 1�111!•3em N���I�� w •� IEfiyiRR- u�•t•ii•• .:el�� •�iaw— MO a 1111111IIIIIISIII �. 94 �".�� � �i;�,; �• I�. .��1� 1 11111111111�IIIIIIRd �; 11 - • 1 1 IIINII1 Illlllllll I� �r""- 1 '1 11�I11 11111 lei N®11111 N1�111/ Derr 694 • • �il,lll /Idill�ll- /II�I1111N11 .. ININN ." �"^°�^• 1111��1 �1 .. .. ` Illllllllllll IIIIIIII/ ,11 a�.as _ 4 , x_�.� /oV�p �� �l11A11 �'��1 IIIIn1111 IIINNI�J� � m� M � ■wdlll � ���II 1111111 1® !!�l I�Illllllllll®Illlllllll�®/ I N l. �-�,.w ���nl ' • 494 I 1 11111 X11 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIII lllllFIN I�ZIIII�dls3�lln @111111!!!x�,, 1 �� •,i��. , I �IIN�� �1 �, Ill®nll @�:'�� ��Rl�i 1 • I�'1 «� � • . . . . . . .• 11 ., �m� �n a■�®lee L' • • • o , i • ��� �-■ 111 ���©ii ■ m` 94 143iy �■ . JIN•�u r • • •r r • •• •• r o r •• r • o •• ••e • • li •® t • ' "� ■ '"�t�y � 1���©���e� •■ ®���■• � '� Nllllll �� • �� r1/Illlllmea©��� J • r r r r 1 • o • • • r• • . 1IIIIIlmilli ������ uw •r • r • r r ••r• e - • - 1 11!!11®II r • r r • • • •r r• • •r• n • - ® • tl • + • • •�"� 111!11®IIIII���� �� � MEN �� Ism ��;■'����� - �394 111111 � ��� why County Road 81? The Roadway The Northwest Corridor along County Road 81 is home to an extraordinary wealth of assets.,a major hospital,two colleges,an airport,a railway,two lakes,three creeks,and a • ►" Major regionol park. Beyond its natural assets,the Corridor "' '• '' ' ' ' t " ' ' communities make up a richly diverse population,from the dense urban areas of North Minneapolis to the developing areas of Rogers. • •• • • •i• • • •• An exciting.combination of public and private leaders have formed the Northwest Corridor Partnership to mobilize resources,align public policies,and focus the ' ' '"' • ' ' " marketplace on the new opportunities in the Corridor.The local governments of the cities surrounding;the Corridor are '" ' " ' ' • '• "' ' historically innovative and strong with solid leaders,'' ' ► ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' " committed to providing excellent public service. ' ►• ► • • • ' ' ' ' County Road 81 is now the focus of a reconstruction • '• and mo(lernlzation-program that will serve the community •• • • • • • • • • • for the next 50 years. It is an ideal corridor for '" • • ' ' '" ' ' ' redevelopment because of its many assets,broad ' "" • • " ' ' '" ' ' ' ' employment base with many job opportunities,coupled with ' ' • • • ' ' '"' ' ' ' its excellent connections to the regional transportation • • • • • • • • • • •• � • • • system,linking to Interstotes 94 and 694,and Highways 169, • ' ' ' ' ' ' 610,252 and 100. • • •i• • • • • • i • • The Partnership has adopted a redevelopment' ' • •' framework to identify a large number of opportunities to integrate enhanced natural systems,parks and trails with housing and commercial development that connects to these trarlSpf3TtaWrr improvements. Already local communities and the Partnership have succeeded in having the corridor designated as a priority for Bus Rapid Transit(BRT)and Hennepin County has committed to a major redesign and renovation of the roadway. The Northwest Corridor Partnership believes WE redevelopment of the County Road 81 corridor presents an ; exceptional opportunity to revitalize,connect and strengthen communities along the corridor. To learn more about the work of the Partnership,log on to www.northwestcorridor.org. p,y, WHAT IS TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD)? A Community Advisory Committee(CAC)was appointed by the Northwest Corridor Partnership representing its member TOD combines traditional land use planning with communities and private stakeholders to guide the Project's transportation systems to create physical form,contains a mix of planning and development.The CAC provides essential input uses that support the needs of a community(living,working; from area residents.As the Project moves from planning to shopping,entertainment),is designed in a pedestrian friendly design and then to implementation,the CAC will report manner and supports public transit operations b enhancing pp p p y ncmg the to community leaders and area residents,and bring potential for transit ridership. progress ty g recommendations back to project consultants and managers. WHAT ARE THE KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF TOO? At points in the process,the CAC will make Q A transit station located central to the development recommendations on key issues such as the alignment,design and transit service levels.In their role as project communicators, © Mixed use—retail at street level with housing above. CAC members will meet with state legislators and others © Higher densities nearest the transit station. regarding project status,changes and funding requirements. Q Streets and pedestrian paths leading to the station. - © A pedestrian-friendly environment. Transit-oriented development �ycb The Northwest Corridor Partnership seeks to balance subregional and ocal benefits by coordinating public 1 i i infrastructure improvements,natural systems enhancements, Mixed-used development combines retail at street level employment opportunities,new land use patterns and 'Ip with housing above revitalizing existing places within the corridor. © By redesigning and redeveloping the roadway and its surrounding land patterns,a great opportunity exists to reclaim natural assets and redefine the corridor.The result will be a multi-modal transportation corridor,defined by new mixed-use development,surrounded by enhanced natural systems and recreational open spaces and increased local quality of life. I CITY COUNCIL MEETING Public Copy City of Brooklyn Center • February 11, 2002 AGENDA 1. Informal Open Forum With City Council - 6:45 p.m. -provides an opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda. Open Forum will be limited to 15 minutes, it is not televised, and it may not be used to make personal attacks,to air personality grievances,to make political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with citizens. Questions from the Council will be for clarification only. Open Forum will not be used as a time for problem solving or reacting to the comments made but,rather,for hearing the citizen for informational purposes only. 2. Invocation —7 p.m. 3. Call to Order Regular Business Meeting 4. Roll Call 5. Pledge of Allegiance 6. Council Report • 7. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda -The following items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at the end of Council Consideration Items. a. Approval of Minutes -Councilmembers not present at meetings will be recorded as abstaining from the vote on the minutes. 1. January 28, 2002— Study Session 2. January 28, 2002—Regular Session b. Licenses C. Approval of Application for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License from the Anoka County Pheasants Forever for An Event to Be Held on March 9, 2002, at the Earle Brown Heritage Center d. Approval of Application for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License from the ® North Hennepin Community College Foundation for An Event to Be Held on April 19, 2002, at the Earle Brown Heritage Center CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- February 11, 2002 • e. Resolution Declaring Surplus Property f. Resolution Providing for Hearing on Proposed Special Assessments for Diseased Tree Removal Costs, Delinquent Weed Removal Costs, and Delinquent Public Utility Service Accounts 8. Public Hearing a. Improvement Project Nos. 2002-05, 06, and 07, Garden City South Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements -Resolution Ordering Improvements and Authorizing Development of Plans and Specifications for Improvement Project Nos. 2002-05,06,and 07,Garden City South Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements •Requested Council Action: -Open the public hearing. -Take public input. -Close the public hearing. -Motion to adopt resolution. ® 9. Planning Commission Items a. Planning Commission Application No. 2002-001 Submitted by Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC. Request for Rezoning and Site and Building Plan Approval Through the Planned Unit Development(PUD)Process for the Redevelopment of the SuperAmerica Convenience Store/Gas Station at the Southwest Corner of 57th and Logan Avenues North. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this application at its January 31, 2002, meeting. -Resolution Regarding Disposition of Planning Commission Application No.2002- 00 1 Submitted by Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC -An Ordinance Amending Chapter 3 5 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Zoning Classification of Certain Land (Southwest Corner of 57th and Logan Avenues North) *Requested Council Action: -Motion to approve Planning Commission Application No.2002-001 subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. -Motion to approve resolution. -Motion to approve first reading of ordinance and set second reading and public hearing on March 11, 2002. • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- February 11, 2002 • b. Planning Commission Application No. 2002-002 Submitted by Marathon Ashland Petroleum. Request for Preliminary Plat Approval to Subdivide and Combine Three Parcels Totaling 79,496 sq. ft. (1.825 Acres)into Two Lots at the Southwest Corner of 57th and Logan Avenues North. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this application at its January 31, 2002, meeting. •Requested Council Action: -Motion to approve Planning Commission Application No. 2002-002 subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. 10. Council Consideration Items a. Resolution Expressing Appreciation for the Gift of the Brooklyn Center Lions Club in Support of Our Family Fun Activities *Requested Council Action: -Motion to adopt resolution. b. Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing on Proposed Use of 2002 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Funds •Requested Council Action: • -Motion to adopt resolution. C. Resolution of the City of Brooklyn Center Approving Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority's Participation in the Shingle Creek Tower Project •Requested Council Action: -Motion to adopt resolution. d. Resolution Accepting Engineer's Feasibility Report and Calling for a Public Hearing, Improvement Project Nos. 2002-01, 02, and 03, Southwest Area Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements *Requested Council Action: -Motion to adopt resolution. e. Staff Report RE: Status of Improvement Project No. 2002-04, France Avenue Relocation •Requested Council Action: -None, report only. 11. Adjournment • s City Council Agenda Item No. 7a • MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION JANUARY 28, 2002 WEST FIRE STATION—TRAINING ROOM CALL TO ORDER STUDY SESSION The Brooklyn Center City Council met in study session and was called to order by Mayor Myrna Kragness at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Myrna Kragness, Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Ed Nelson, Bob Peppe, and Tim Ricker. Also Present: City Manager Michael J. McCauley, Assistant City Manager Jane Chambers, and Deputy City Clerk Maria Rosenbaum. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF AGENDA ITEMS AND QUESTIONS Council discussed City Council agenda item 9a,Resolution Accepting Engineer's Feasibility Report • and Calling for a Public Hearing,Improvement Project Nos.2002-05,06,and 07,Garden City South Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements, and Economic Development Authority (EDA) agenda items 4a, Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing on the Sale of EDA Owned Property Located at the Northwest Quadrant of 69"' Avenue North and Brooklyn Boulevard, and 4b, Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing on the Granting of a Business Subsidy for the 69`h and Brooklyn Boulevard Retail Development Project. City Manager Michael McCauley discussed that the two EDA items were written incorrectly stating that the public hearings to be held on February 11, 2002, would be held at City Hall, when in fact they will be held at the West Fire Station. Mr.McCauley informed the Council that the resolutions could still be approved and that he would have staff correct the resolutions. DISCUSSION OF ORCHARD LANE SCHOOL CLOSING Mr. McCauley requested direction from the Council as to what position they would like to take on the closing of Orchard Lane School. Council discussed and was in consensus that the previously adopted resolution be sent again to the School Board and that further information would be useful. 0 01/28/02 -1- DRAFT MISCELLANEOUS Mr.McCauley briefly outlined what he would like to present at the regular meeting regarding agenda item 9d, Report on State Budget Shortfall. Councilmember Peppe requested housing mix percentages,percentages of senior residents,and Tax Increment Financing (TIF)updates. Councilmember Lasman questioned how the TIF is impacted with all that is going on with the Governor's proposal. Mr. McCauley informed the Council that Springsted is working on an analysis and that the Council will be presented an update once the analysis is complete. Councilmember Nelson reported that he attended the Minnesota Stadium Task Force meeting and informed the Council that the option is open for a stadium in any City and that there are several types of financing. ADJOURNMENT The Council continued into open forum at 6:45 p.m. City Clerk Mayor 01/28/02 -2- DRAFT • MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION JANUARY 28, 2002 WEST FIRE STATION—TRAINING ROOM 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM The Brooklyn Center City Council continued from its study session into informal open forum at 6:45 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Myrna Kragness, Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Ed Nelson, Bob Peppe, and Tim Ricker. Also present: City Manager Michael J. McCauley,Assistant City Manager Jane Chambers,Public Works Director Diane Spector, Attorney Daniel Greensweig, and Deputy City Clerk Maria Rosenbaum. ® No one wished to address the Council. ADJOURN INFORMAL OPEN FORUM The Council adjourn informal open forum at 6:56 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 2. INVOCATION Mayor Kragness offered an invocation. 3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Myrna Kragness at 7:01 p.m. 4. ROLL CALL Mayor Myrna Kragness, Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Ed Nelson, Bob Peppe, and Tim Ricker. Also present: City Manager Michael J. McCauley, Assistant City Manager Jane Chambers,Public Works Director Diane Spector, Attorney Daniel Greensweig, and Deputy City Clerk Maria Rosenbaum. • 01/28/02 -1- DRAFT 5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE I The Pledge of Allegiance was spoken. 6. COUNCIL REPORT Mayor Kragness informed the audience that Representative Hilstrom and Representative Greiling were co-chairing a meeting of the House DFL Caucus at Orchard Lane School from 7:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. this evening to take input on the situation facing schools and encouraged anyone that would be able to attend to attend and provide input. Councilmember Nelson reported that he attended the Earle Brown Days Committee meeting on January 15, 2002, and on January 17 and 24,2002,the Brooklyn Center Special Events Committee meetings. He discussed that the Brooklyn Center Special Events Committee continues to plan for the 91" Birthday Celebration that will be held on February 9, 2002. He also attended a D.A.R.E. Program and the Southwest Area Street Improvement Project meeting on January 24, 2002. Councilmember Nelson commended the City Attorney on the work well done in recovering an overpayment to a construction company back in 1996. Councilmember Peppe reported that he attended the D.A.R.E. Program at Northport on January 24, 2002, and commended the work of all involved with this program. Councilmember Lasman reported that she attended the Brooklyn Center Special Events Committee meetings on January 17 and 24, 2002, and also a Crime Prevention meeting on January 16, 2002. Mayor Kragness informed the audience that the Convention and Visitors Bureau had been working with area hotels and accomplished a new shuttle service to be provide transportation to and from hotels and the Minneapolis/St. Paul Airport. This new shuttle service will begin on March 4,2002. Mayor Kragness reported that she attended the U.S.Mayors Conference in Washington and was able to meet with the President and take a trip to Ground Zero in New York which was an unforgettable experience. 7. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA A motion by Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Ricker to approve the agenda and consent agenda as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 7a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion by Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Ricker to approve the minutes from the January 14, 2002, study session and regular session. Motion passed unanimously. 01/28/02 -2- DRAFT • • 7b. LICENSES A motion by Councilmember Nelson,seconded by Councilmember Ricker to approve the following list of licenses. Motion passed unanimously. AMUSEMENT DEVICES - OPERATOR American Amusement Arcades 5930 Earle Brown Drive MECHANICAL Air Conditioning Associates 689 Pierce Butler Route, St. Paul Complete Mechanical, Inca 5871 Queens Avenue NE, Elk River Elite Heating &Air 3511 Kahler Drive NE, St. Michael Jay Hawk Mechanical 1245 Choke Cherry Road, Lino Lakes RENTAL Renewal: 3614-16 50th Avenue North Kj irsten Bj erke-Keenan 7215 Girard Avenue North Marya Hage 4100 Lakebreeze Avenue North Bruce Waage 6813 Noble Avenue North David Zemke 6821 Noble Avenue North Reuben Ristrom • 6835 Noble Avenue North Robert Berglund 7110 Riverdale Road ACR Homes, Inc. (James Nelson) 7240 West River Road Nedzad Ceric 7113 Willow Lane North Gary Johnson TOBACCO RELATED PRODUCT E.B.T. General Store 6120 Earle Brown Drive Hilton Hotel 2200 Freeway Boulevard Terry Presler Amoco 6044 Brooklyn Boulevard 8. PUBLIC HEARING 8a. AN ORDINANCE VACATING CERTAIN UTILITY EASEMENTS IN BROOKLYN CROSSING 3RD ADDITION City Manager Michael McCauley discussed that this ordinance vacating certain utility easements in BROOKLYN CROSSING 3RD ADDITION was requested by CSM Corporation to accomplish a utility easement vacation at the property of 3200 Bass Lake Road. A motion by Councilmember Peppe,seconded Councilmember Lasman to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. 01/28/02 -3- DRAFT No one wished to address the Council. • A motion by Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Lasman to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. ORDINANCE NO. 2002-02 Councilmember Nelson introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: AN ORDINANCE VACATING CERTAIN UTILITY EASEMENTS IN BROOKLYN CROSSING 3'D ADDITION The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Councilmember Lasman. Motion passed unanimously. 9. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS 9a. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2002-05, 06, AND 07, GARDEN CITY SOUTH STREET, STORM DRAINAGE,AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Mr. McCauley discussed that this resolution would accept the engineer's feasibility report and call for public hearing to consider approval of the project for February 11, 2002. RESOLUTION NO. 2002-16 Councilmember Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2002-05, 06,AND 07, GARDEN CITY SOUTH STREET, STORM DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Peppe. Motion passed unanimously. 9b. MAYORAL APPOINTMENT TO PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION Mayor Kragness requested ratification of Roger Peterson, 15 11 71"Avenue North,to serve on the Park and Recreation Commission. 01/28/02 -4- DRAFT A motion by Councilmember Lasman, seconded by Councilmember Nelson to ratify Mayoral nomination of Roger Peterson, 1511 71" Avenue North, with term expiring December 31, 2004. Motion passed unanimously. 9c. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS IN CHAPTER 12 OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING TO THE LICENSING OF RENTAL PROPERTIES Mr.McCauley discussed that this ordinance amendment would strengthen and clarify rental housing licensing procedures and calls for a public hearing on February 25, 2002. Councilmember Nelson requested that all rental property owners currently licensed in the City be notified of the proposed ordinance amendment and date of public hearing. A motion by Councilmember Ricker, seconded by Councilmember Nelson to approve first reading and set second reading and public hearing for February 25, 2002. Motion passed unanimously. 9d. REPORT ON STATE BUDGET SHORTFALL Mr. McCauley reported on the Governor's proposed budget and the latest numbers available to reduce aids. He briefly outlined the budget materials that had been previously presented to show the breakdown of what the City does with revenues in providing services to its citizens and shared a per • capita breakdown with surrounding cities. 9e. REPORT ON HERITAGE FESTIVAL Assistant City Manager Jane Chambers reported on the Heritage Festival that will be held on March 17,2002, at the Brooklyn Center High School from 12:00 p.m.to 4:00 p.m. This will be the 10"'annual celebration and she encouraged anyone who might be interested to attend. She informed the Council that if any group was interested in participating in the festival or if anyone wanted information about the festival to contact herself or Valerie Jones at the Northwest Hennepin Human Services. 9f. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING 2002 PLANTING LIST OF ALLOWABLE BOULEVARD TREE SPECIES Mr.McCauley discussed that this resolution is prepared each year to designate planting of allowable boulevard trees and that it is important to note that trees cannot be planted in the boulevard,which is approximately 10 to 15 feet from the street, without a permit. RESOLUTION NO. 2002-17 Councilmember Peppe introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: • 01/28/02 -5- DRAFT RESOLUTION DESIGNATING 2002 PLANTING LIST OF ALLOWABLE BOULEVARD TREE o SPECIES The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Lasman. Motion passed unanimously. 10. ADJOURNMENT A motion by Councilmember Lasman, seconded by Councilmember Ricker to adjourn the City Council meeting at 7:37 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. City Clerk Mayor 01/28/02 -6- DRAFT • City Council Agenda Item No. 7b City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community • TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Maria Rosenbaum, Deputy City Clerk dITZ DATE: February 6, 2002 SUBJECT: Licenses for Council Approval The following companies/persons have applied for City licenses as noted. Each company/person has fulfilled the requirements of the City Ordinance governing respective licenses,submitted appropriate applications, and paid proper fees. Licenses to be approved by the City Council on February 11, 2002. MECHANICAL General Sheet Metal Corp. 2330 Louisiana Avenue North, Minneapolis Randy & Ruth Inc. 4595 Otter Lake Road, White Bear Lake • RENTAL Renewal: 1706 71 st Avenue North Patricia Sandeen 5837 Brooklyn Boulevard Duane Ferguson 6230 Kyle Avenue North Warren McLaughlin 4207 Lakeside Avenue N, #134 William& Linda Bjerke Initial: 2401-03 54th Avenue North Robert Messersmith 5332-36 Russell Avenue North Douglas Ryan 3206 Thurber Road Mains'l Services, Inc, Teresa Williams TAXICAB Chukwudi Okeke 6720 Cedar Avenue, Richfield 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 (763) 569-3400 City Hall & TDD Number (763) 569-3300 FAX(763) 569-3434 FAX(763) 569-3494 City Council Agenda Item No. 7c �QpOKLYN CEV BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE DEPARTMENT EPARTMENT POLICE MEMORANDUM TO: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk FROM: Scott Bechthold, Chief of Police DATE: January 30, 2002 SUBJECT: Application for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License (Raffle) On January 30, 2002, the Brooklyn Center Police Department received a Minnesota Lawful • Gambling Application for Exempt Permit - LG220 from Anoka County Pheasants Forever. This application is for an event to be held at the Earle Brown Heritage Center on March 9, 2002. This application has been approved and will be returned to the Pheasants Forever representative after City Council review. The Pheasants Forever representative will forward it to the State Gambling Control Board. If you or any member of the City Council objects to issuing this license, you must notify me within 30 days according to Minnesota State Statute. SB:kh • ent By: RDS; JetSuite; Jan-29-02 7:58PM; Page 1 /2 Minnesota Lawful Gambling P,)ge i of 2 3r�1 4�2�i1 or oa Use qn y G2 1l Application for Exempt Permit Fee - $25 „�j_ Organization Information Chock NQ. Urganization name Previous lawful gambling exemption number c.,-- �S c ,. �—t� re S treat _ �� Ciiy SiatelZip Code County 61e- Name of chief executive officer(CEO) First namo Last namQ Daytime phone number of CEO l-7e,le �.`isL11 S Name of treasurer Daytime phono number of First name Last name tre-asurer: Type of Nonprofit Organization Check the box that best describes your organization: ❑ Fraternal ❑ Religious ❑ Veteran ther nonprofit organization Check the box that indicates the type of proof your organization attache!to this application: ❑ IRS letter indicating inmmo tax exempt status ❑ Certificate of Good Standing from the Minnesota Secretary'of State's Office ❑ harter showing you are an affiliate of a parent nonprok organization Proof previously submitted and on file with the Gambling Control Board Gambling Premises Information Name of prornises where gambling activity will be eonductecl (for raffles,list the'.sito whe.re the car awirtg will take place) Address(do not use PO box) C Sy 1 Siale-01)Cude l L2 County �s� 3 ,2 ... Gates f activit (for raffles,indicate the date of thri . Check the box or bZffiaus at indic ult-the type of gambling act, ur orrganiz4on will be conducting: ❑ 'Bingo (cash prizes may not exceed$12.000) ❑ *Paddlewheels 'Pill-Tags ❑"Tipboards 'Equipment for these activities must be ol,tiained from a licensed distribiftor. This form will be made available in Yaur name and and your organization's the following: tivard members,staff of the ahernative format (i.e. large print, Braille) name and address will be public Information Board whose worK assignment requires upon reuest. The information requested when received by the Boam, All the other that they have access to tho information; on this form(and any attachmCnts)will he information that you provide will be pLovate the Minnesota Department of Put,,&Safety; used by the Gambling, Control Board data at�out you until the Board insueti your lliv Minnesota (attorney General; the (Board)todatarminr ynttrqualficationsto pcnnit. Whin ihr fsnard issues your Minnesota Cummissionors of be involved in lawful gambfinq activities in permit,all of the information that you;,have Administration,Financr:,and Revenue:the Minnesota, You have the right to refuse to provided to the Bo in the pro of Minnesota Legislative Auditor,national aril supply the information requested;however, app"na for your perm ftwill become public. ntemationai rdttmbling regu4atory agencies; if you refuse to supply this information,the if the anon( does not Issue you a pi3rnit, anyunv pursuant to court order; other Board may not be Qblu to dtate mhita your all thentfurntkjtwri ytwhaveprovidedInthe individual! And agencies that are ctualjfications and,as a consequence,may pmccw of apploiq for a permit retharns specifically autttotrled by state or federal rofuse to i.wie you a pormit. if YOU auppty irrivate, with the exception of your Name law to have accnse to the information: the information requested, the Board will and youroryaniza6on's name and address individuals and agencies for which law or be able to process your application. which will remain public, legal order authorizes a new use orsharing Pnvdte data aboutyou are available o�iIyto of information after this Notice was given; • ;awl)anyone with your consent. .1 ent By: RDS; , JetSuite; Jan-29-02 7:59PM; Page 212 LG220 - Application for Exempt Permit Pagr.2 of 2 - ------ :ihi 1 • Organization Name v�cy►G� Co Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment _ If the gambling premises Is within city limits,the If the gambling premises is located in a township,Moth City must sign this application. the county and township must sign this application. On behalf of the city, I acknowledge this application. On L,ehalf of the county, 1 acknowledge this application. Check the action that Check the action that the city is taking on this application. the county is taking on this application. ❑ The city approves the application with no ❑ The county approves the application with no p waiting Prind, waiting period. the city approves the application with a 30 day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a The county approves the application with a 30 day pormit after 30 days(SD days for a first class waiting permit 30 days Period,and allows the board to issue a city), perr►it . ry The city denies the application, The county denies [lie application. U Print na of It T�f ;_�� Print name of county --___-__-_ (Signature of city personnel neceivinq application) (Seyivature of county personnel receiving application) C -- Title---�.� — Title—_- .� C�,• � �--- _----------- r� gate. . .--�---t----• Gate- •• --/-V -/--Q TOWNSHIP: On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that • the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township limits. IA township has no statutory authority to approve or deny on appiication (Minn.Stat.sec. 349.21:3,subd. 2).] Print name of township------------- --------- (Signature of iownsnip official acknowledging application) T itle Date-----1-----f------ Chief Executive Officer's Signature The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Chief executive officer's signature Name(please print)---------- -------- --------- --- Date----/ ---�- Mail Application and Attachments At least 45 days prior to your scheduled activity date send: the completed application,PP tf y aurapplication has not • a copy of your proof of nonprofit status, and bocn acknowledged by the a $25 application fee (make check payable to "State of Minnesota"), local unit of govemment or Application fees are not prorated, refundabic,or transferable_ has been denied,do not Send to: Gambling Control Board send the application to the 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South Gambling Control Board. Roseville, MN 55113 0 • City Council Agenda Item No. 7d • �T Y B RO O 111J �Qt00KlYN CENlF� N CENTER POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICE MEMORANDUM TO: City Clerk Sharon Knutson FROM: Scott Bechthold Chie f of Police , DATE: January 31, 2002 SUBJECT: Application for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License (Raffle Application) -North Hennepin Community College Foundation On January 31, 2002, the Brooklyn Center Police Department received an Application for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License from the North Hennepin Community College Foundation. This application is for an event to be held at the Earle Brown Heritage Center on April 19, 2002. This application has been approved and will be returned to the North Hennepin Community College Foundation representative after City Council review. The representative will forward it to the State Gambling Control Board. If you or any member of the City Council objects to issuing this license, you must notify me within 30 days according to Minnesota State Statute. JD:kh • Minnesota Lawful Gambling Page 1 of 2 3/01 For Board use only LG220 - Application for Exempt Permit Fee - $25 Fee Paid Organization Information Check No. Organization name Previous lawful gambling exemption number North Hennepin Community College foundation x-27108-98-002" Street City State/Zip Code County 7411 85th Ave. N. Brooklyn Park IMN 55445 1 Hennepin Name of chief executive officer(CEO) First name Last name Daytime phone number of CEO Don Davis 763-561-2717 Name of treasurer Daytime phone number of First name Last name treasurer: Barb 763-425-2315 Type of Nonprofit Organization Check the box that best describes your organization: ❑ Fraternal ❑ Religious ❑ Veteran © Other nonprofit organization Check the box that indicates the type of proof your organization attached to this application: © IRS letter indicating income tax exempt status ❑ Certificate of Good Standing from the Minnesota Secretary of State's Office ❑ A charter showing you are an affiliate of a parent nonprofit organization ❑ Proof previously submitted and on file with the Gambling Control Board - Gambling Premises Information Name of premises where gambling activity will be conducted(for raffles,list the site where the drawing will take place) Earle Brown Herita e Center Address(do not use PO box) City State/Zip Code County 6155 Earle Brown Drive Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Hennepin Date(s)of activity(for raffles,indicate the date of the drawing) April 19, 2001 Check the box or boxes that indicate the type of gambling activity your organization will be conducting: ❑ `Bingo Q Raffles(cash prizes may not exceed$12,000) ❑ 'Paddlewheels ❑`Pull-Tabs ❑ `Tipboards "Equipment for these activities must be obtained from a licensed distributor. This form will be made available in Your name and and your organization's the following: Board members,staff of the alternative format (i.e. large print, Braille) name and address will be public information Board whose work assignment requires upon request. The information requested when received by the Board. All the other that they have access to the information; on this form(and any attachments)will be information that you provide will be private the Minnesota Department of Public Safety; used by the Gambling Control Board data about you until the Board issues your the Minnesota Attorney General; the (Board)to determine your qualifications to permit. When the Board issues your Minnesota Commissioners of be involved in lawful gambling activities in permit,all of the information that you have Administration,Finance,and Revenue;the Minnesota. You have the right to refuse to provided to the Board in the process of Minnesota Legislative Auditor,national and supply the information requested;however, applying for your permit will become public. international gambling regulatory agencies; if you refuse to supply this information,the If the Board does not issue you a permit, anyone pursuant to court order; other Board may not be able to determine your all the information you have provided in the individuals and agencies that are qualifications and,as a consequence,may process of applying for a permit remains specifically authorized by state or federal refuse to issue you a permit. If you supply private, with the exception of your name law to have access to the information; the information requested, the Board will and your organization's name and address individuals and agencies for which law or be able to process your application. which will remain public. legal order authorizes a new use or sharing Private data about you are available only to of information after this Notice was given; • and anyone with your consent. Page 2 of 2 LG220 -Application for Exempt Permit 3/01 • Organization Name__ North_Hennepin Community College ---------------- ----------------- Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment If the gambling premises is within city limits,the If the gambling premises is located in a township, both city must sign this application. the county and township must sign this application. On behalf of the city, I acknowledge this application On behalf of the county, I acknowledge this application. Check the action that Check the action that the city is taking on this application. the county is taking on this application. ❑ The city approves the application with no 11 The county approves the application with no waiting period. waiting period. ❑ The city approves the application with a 30 day El The county approves the application with a 30 day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days (60 days for a first class permit after 30 days. city). The city denies the application. The county denies the application. Print nam f city__ _b Print name of county--------------------- __—____ Si (Signature of county personnel receiving application) (Signature of city personnel receiving application) ` ^�[ ------------ Title------------------ I Title-----��� Date ------/------/------ Date _/_ l/_ TOWNSHIP: On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that • the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township limits. [A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application(Minn.Stat.sec. 349.213,subd.2)] Print name of township (Signature of township official acknowledging application) Titl e Date---/----/---- Chief Executive Officer's Signature The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Chief executive officer's signature _/ft� ��� Name(please print)_�Q/1�gLi� (S Date��_ / - Mail Application and Attachments At least 45 days prior to your scheduled activity date send: • the completed application, If your application has not • a copy of your proof of nonprofit status, and been acknowledged by the • a $25 application fee(make check payable to"State of Minnesota"). local unit of government or Application fees are not prorated, refundable, or transferable. has been denied,do not Send to: Gambling Control Board send the application to the 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South Gambling Control Board. Roseville, MN 55113 • • City Council Agenda Item No. 7e • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its • adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING SURPLUS PROPERTY WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center purchased a Vulcan stove, fixed asset 412449, in 1993 for the Community Center kitchen; and WHEREAS,the Hennepin County Health Department will not allow use of this stove in the remodeled Community Center kitchen without significant venting improvements; and WHEREAS,the cost of said venting improvements are prohibitive. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota: 1. Fixed asset item number 412449 is declared surplus property. 2. The City Manager is authorized to dispose of the property through the auction process or through a reputable restaurant supply vendor. • Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • City Council Agenda Item No. 7f MEMORANDUM • DATE: February 6, 2002 TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Diane Spector, Director of Public Work SUBJECT: Resolution Providing for Hearing on Proposed Special Assessments for Diseased Tree Removal Costs, Delinquent Weed Removal Costs, and Delinquent Public Utility Service Accounts. The purpose of this resolution is to order a public hearing on Monday, March 11, 2002 at 7 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the proposed special assessments for tree removal costs, delinquent weed removal accounts, and delinquent public utility service accounts. All trees have been declared a public nuisance in the past City Council resolutions, and the trees have been removed by the City's tree contractor in accordance with established policy. Delinquent weed destruction account property owners have received notice of delinquent accounts in accordance with the established collection policy and have not made payment. Property owners with delinquent public utilities service accounts have received notice of delinquent account in accordance with the established collection policy and have not made payment. Proposed levy rolls are attached for the Council's information, except for the Delinquent Public Utility Service Accounts. That proposed levy roll will be available for inspection Monday night. Future council actions include the public hearing at the specified date and adoption of the resolution to certify the special assessment levy rolls with Hennepin County. The interest rate is 6.0 percent, as previously established by the Council_ • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DISEASED TREE REMOVAL COSTS, DELINQUENT WEED REMOVAL COSTS, AND DELINQUENT PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICE ACCOUNTS BE IS RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 11th day of March, 2002 in the Training Room at the West Fire Station at the corner of 63`d Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard at 7 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to pass upon the proposed assessments for the following charges: Diseased Tree Removal Costs Delinquent Weed Removal Costs Delinquent Public Utility Service Accounts 2. The City Clerk with the assistance of the Director of Public Works shall forthwith prepare assessment rolls for the above charges, and shall keep them on • file and open to inspection by any interested persons. 3. The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing. 4. The City Clerk shall cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in such assessment rolls not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: • and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL MARCH 11, 2002 TREE REMOVAL 2002 MUNICIPAL CODE NO. 22 Levy runs five 5 ears PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER LEVY PROPERTY ADDN. Address Name NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. AMOUNT Le al Descri tion Mailing Address 15376 01.118-21.33-0052 89365 $1,935.80 5448 GIRARD AVE N JERILYN BORTH 15376 01-118-21-33-0111 89675 $1,678.80 5355 EMERSON AVE N JAMES BREZINSKI 15376 01.118-21-33-0158 89675 $1,657.50 5456 EMERSON AVE N BARBARA PLOUMEN 15376 02.118-21-41-0009 89103 $397.45 5547 HUMBOLDT AVE N CHARLES&STEPHPANIE SKAUDIS 15376 02-118.21.43-0130 89966 $397.25 5412 PENN AVE N ANTHONY&FELISA MARTIN 15376 03.118-21.24.0100 89667 $381.50 5825 HALIFAX AVE N DAVID&TEAL JOHNSON 15376 10.118-21-31-0003 89010 $1,444.50 4650 INDIANA AVE N VIRGIL& MARJORIE DAHINDEN 15376 25.119-21-32.0017 89104 $211.40 1401 73RD AVE N ERIC HAINEY 15376 28-119-21-44-0053 89605 $255.50 6907 QUAIL AVE N GAYLYN EDSTROM 15376 33-119-21.12-0068 89628 $2,988.75 6825 SCOTT AVE N ROBERT&LAURIE DUNCAN 15376 35-119-21-32.0109 89390 $2,722.50 2706 63RD AVE N TERESA GOWDA $14,070.95 • • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL MARCH 11,2002 WEED DESTRUCTION 2002 MUNICIPAL CODE NO. 22 Levy runs one 1 year PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER LEVY PROPERTY ADDN. Address Name NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. AMOUNT Legal Description Mailing Address 15377 01.118-21-23-0087 89679 $130.00 5743 GIRARD AVE N EDDIE WARD 15377 01-118-21-32-0047 89001 $320.00 5650 HUMBOLDT AVE N ALBERT WILLIAMS 15377 10.118.21.14-0011 89010 $320.00 4957 BROOKLYN BLVD SHEILA RICHARDSON 15377 33-119.21-13-0077 89346 $140.00 6601 UNITY AVE N SCHELLINA HUGHES 15377 35-119-21.11-0036 01291 $320.00 LOT 11, BLOCK i ROSEMARY TERRACE CORP ROSEMARY TERRACE ADDITION 17799 KENWOOD TRAIL#400 LAKEVILLE MN 55044 15377 36.119.21.12-0002 89104 $220.00 6856 WEST RIVER RD ZEV OMAN 12011 WEST RIVER RD CHAMPLIN,MN 55316 15377 36.119-21-12-0038 89105 $130.00 LOT 30 AUDITOR'S SUBD NO 310 DAVID EVANSON 2208 73RD AVE N BROOKLYN PARK MN 55444 15377 36.119.21.21-0065 90066 $130.00 6830 DUPONT AVE N ZAKARIA&JAHANU ADEM SAFIYA BADHASO $1,710.00 • • CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 1 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 100016000001 LARRY MEYER S Y 109.49 .00 109.49 3311921120010 6843 TOLEDO AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1669 100020000403 DIANNA ANDERSON S Y 148.27 .00 148.27 3311921120014 6819 TOLEDO AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1669 100035000702 DESIREE WILKERSON S Y 232.63 .00 232.63 3311921120056 5318 68TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1653 100046000401 DOROTHY PINCK S Y 87.98 .00 87.98 3311921120025 6725 TOLEDO AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1679 100050000704 THOMAS ANDREWS S Y 233 .09 .00 233.09 3311921120036 5312 67TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1650 100057000003 KENNY AKINDEMOURO S Y 128.59 .00 128.59 3311921120053 5407 67TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1675 100079000404 KAREN EDEBURN S Y 179.83 .00 179.83 3311921120072 6801 SCOTT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1665 100085000603 KHALI RASHEED S Y 232 .33 .00 232.33 3311921120066 6837 SCOTT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1665 100086000503 SHARON BRACK S Y 224 .37 .00 224.37 3311921120065 6843 SCOTT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1681 100092000701 GLORIA SAWCHAK S Y 210.69 .00 210.69 3311921120062 6812 SCOTT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1666 100097000202 JOHN N WALBERG S Y 235.11 .00 235.11 3311921120075 6730 SCOTT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1664 100112000303 SCOTT EELLS S Y 189.71 .00 189.71 3311921120095 6807 REGENT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1661 100153000302 JOEY C. NIENABER S Y 120.32 .00 120.32 3311921110062 6818 QUAIL AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1658 0 PROCEDURE ETION INFORMATION ------------------------------- Procedure name: CERTREPT(UBONLN.BC) User: ROBINH,UB.BC,UBONLN Custom user profile: $UB Run date: 11-FEB-2002 Started at: 09:47:41.8 Finished at: 09:47:44.4 Elapsed time: 00:00:02.6 CPU time: 00:00:02.1 Records read: 3347 Records selected: 674 Records written: 675 Selection values: ADDRESS-TYPE : [P] : "S" or TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD : [P] : "Y" and AMT-OPEN : [P] : NE .00 CURRENT CEACATION REPORT 9 11-FEB-2002 (09:470tage 2 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 100164000006 DEBORAH SALITERMAN S Y 263.07 .00 263 .07 3311921110087 6700 QUAIL AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1656 100169000503 DEBRA SCHLICK S Y 142.04 .00 142.04 3311921110056 6727 PERRY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1609 100179000303 MICK MAGUIRE S Y 267.49 .00 267.49 3311921110038 6839 PERRY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1611 100183000709 SUNNY NYEMAH S Y 184.77 .00 184.77 3311921110031 6830 PERRY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1612 100183000709 KORPO NYEMAH 2 Y 3311921110031 6830 PERRY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1612 100186000401 CARLOS MUJICA S Y 221.34 .00 221.34 3311921110034 6812 PERRY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1612 100190000803 KATHLEEN MEGEARS S Y 241.99 .00 241.99 3311921110046 6736 PERRY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1610 100229000304 BEVERLY DAVIS S Y 340.81 .00 340.81 3311921110002 6825 NOBLE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1604 100383000502 DAVID R ERICKSON S Y 77.25 .00 77.25 2711921330020 6920 LEE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1332 100383000502 NANCY A ERICKSON 2 Y 2711921330020 6920 LEE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1332 100384000402 OBIDIAH HENRY S Y 211.67 .00 211.67 2711921330019 6914 LEE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1332 100396000003 TODD UNDHEIM S Y 86.02 .00 86.02 2711921330036 6942 MAJOR AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1338 100406000805 DAN DEMPSEY S Y 109.49 .00 109.49 2711921330042 6915 MAJOR AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1337 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 3 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 100419020102 JON M WAGNER S Y 240.19 .00 240.19 2811921410028 7107 PERRY PL BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1206 100420030704 ED WILLIAMS S Y 114.35 .00 114.35 2811921410031 4909 WINGARD PL BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1213 100422020602 PAUL N KELLY S Y 202.66 .00 202.66 2811921410042 7105 QUAIL CIR E BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1208 100430020604 JOSEPH P HALL S Y 93.32 .00 93.32 2811921410158 7220 PERRY CT E BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1203 100435060709 TODD TOUGHILL S Y 111.65 .00 111.65 2811921410188 4904 WINGARD PL BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1214 100436030903 BARBARA LATHAM S Y 96.56 .00 96.56 2811921410090 7204 PERRY CT E BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1203 100437030806 LINDA GREEN S Y 116.80 .00 116.80 2811921410150 7201 PERRY CT E BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1202 100439000908 EMILY KANDAKAI S Y 274.49 .00 274.49 2811921410126 4800 71ST AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1218 100479000002 GLORIA M PEREZ S Y 259.94 .00 259.94 2811921440040 6900 QUAIL AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1227 100576000202 GAYLYN EDSTROM S Y 107.64 .00 107.64 2811921440053 6907 QUAIL AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1226 100578000001 MERLE DUERR S Y 196.64 .00 196.64 2811921440068 6900 REGENT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1255 100610000004 PHILL SMOGER S Y 211.71 .00 211.71 2811921430009 6906 SCOTT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1259 100613000703 JOHN WILMES S Y 87.98 .00 87.98 2811921430012 6924 SCOTT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1259 9 9 0 CURRENT CERCATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:470age 4 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID 100637170008 STEPHANIE HOLEMAN S N 48.48 .00 48.48 2811921420318 5427 PONDS DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1252 100637170008 UNITY PLACE O Y 2811921420318 7256 UNITY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1269 100638420803 CHRISTIAN BANINI S Y 313.10 .00 313.10 2811921430090 5325 70TH CIR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1234 100638420803 EUREAKA BANINI 2 Y 2811921430090 5325 70TH CIRCLE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 100638440604 ANGELIQUE FLEMONS S Y 232.98 .00 232 .98 2811921430092 5313 70TH CIR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1234 100638550204 NICHOLAS ANTWI S Y 98.64 .00 98.64 2811921430103 5348 70TH CIR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1235 100638820906 JOSEPH KNIGHT S Y 273 .21 .00 273.21 2811921430148 7117 UNITY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1266 100638910802 CLARENCE BLACKMAN S Y 549.34 .00 549.34 2811921430139 7069 UNITY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1264 100639950303 CARLUS BREWER S Y 396.99 .00 396.99 2811921420092 7169 UNITY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1276 100640020203 PERRY BROSTE S Y 87.98 .00 87.98 2811921420098 7193 UNITY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1277 100640040005 DEBBIE ONAFOWOKAN S Y 211.24 .00 211.24 2811921420100 7205 UNITY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1277 100640060804 MARK K HEGSTAD S N 202.83 .00 202.83 2811921420102 7213 UNITY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1277 100640060804 MARK K HEGSTAD F Y 2811921420102 G31 MAPLE HILL ESTATE CORCORAN MN 55340 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 5 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 100735000002 EUGENE AMOS JR S Y 101.95 .00 101.95 3411921120008 6700 FRANCE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1884 100775000102 GEORGE MARSHALL S Y 271.82 .00 271.82 3411921120050 6812 EWING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1882 100787000705 DUANE CATTLEDGE S Y 272.81 .00 272.81 3411921120046 6807 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1877 100808000202 MICHAEL A HIGH S Y 197.51 .00 197.51 3411921120031 6818 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1878 100808000202 ANDREA L HIGH 2 Y 3411921120031 6818 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1878 100810000802 TOM LASHUAY S Y 171.74 .00 171.74 3411921120029 6836 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1878 100814000401 SANDRA WRIGHT S Y 303.41 .00 303.41 3411921110043 6837 BEARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-4212 100837000702 KAUA CHENG S Y 105.36 .00 105.36 3411921140019 3119 67TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1821 100838000602 RENEE WHITTAKER S Y 101.71 .00 101.71 3411921140018 3113 67TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1821 100864000302 CHARLES ACHTELIK S Y 336.36 .00 336.36 3411921110105 3213 THURBER RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1861 100893000806 DONALD STEGMAN S Y 142.81 .00 142.81 3411921110056 3313 68TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-4222 100926000904 BRAD EMHOLTZ S Y 212.97 .00 212.97 3411921110064 3106 68TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-4217 100949000207 DANNY SUGGS S Y 221.80 .00 221.80 3411921110038 6806 BEARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-4211 0 9 9 CURRENT CERCATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:470age 6 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID 100996000405 THOMAS HUFF S N 92.29 .00 92.29 2711921430102 6907 PALMER LAKE DR W BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-4202 100996000405 THOMAS H MYLAN 0 Y 2711921430102 1830 LAKEVIEW ORONO MN 55356-9505 100996000405 LORRAINE MYLAN 2 Y 2711921430102 1830 LAKEVIEW ORONO MN 55356-9505 101023000902 STANLEY LEINO S Y 285.07 .00 285.07 2711921420025 7118 FRANCE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1446 101054000103 DEBRA GROVE S Y 228.42 .00 228.42 2711921420012 7051 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1435 101056000904 TIMOTHY J GRAHAM S Y 222 .72 .00 222.72 2711921430014 7037 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1435 101058000706 DONALD STEEN S Y 171.40 .00 171.40 2711921430016 7025 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1435 101061000205 JAMES VICKROY S Y 207.55 .00 207.55 2711921430019 7007 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1435 101063000002 ISAIAH HOLMAN S Y 235.68 .00 235.68 2711921430021 6943 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1433 101068000502 DONALD WATZKE S Y 90.42 .00 90.42 2711921430009 6942 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1434 101093000403 PAUL BUSHEY S Y 481.72 .00 481.72 2711921430086 3605 VIOLET AVE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1466 101108000702 ERICK EDSTROM S Y 275.64 .00 275.64 2711921420122 3616 VIOLET AVE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1467 101117000603 DAVE KRAUSE S Y 236.63 .00 236.63 2711921420099 3724 VIOLET AVE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1469 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 7 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 101126000503 MARY ROBECK S Y 220.01 .00 220.01 2711921420090 3713 72ND AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1415 101130000902 BRIAN KERN S Y 102.42 .00 102.42 2711921420086 3619 72ND AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1413 101139000002 MICHAEL BELFREY S Y 113.95 .00 113.95 2711921410015 3407 72ND AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1409 101216000603 TERRI MOORE S Y 64.17 .00 64.17 2711921310001 7243 FRANCE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1447 101226000402 JAMES KOCUR S Y 197.52 .00 197.52 2711921310051 7131 FRANCE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1445 101274000503 MARLA G. OBEREMBT S Y 288.62 .00 288.62 2711921310011 7212 GRIMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1456 101284000302 JAMES EDWARDS S Y 251.31 .00 251.31 2711921310021 7219 GRIMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1455 101284000302 ROBYN EDWARDS 2 Y 2711921310021 7219 GRIMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1455 101317000403 DONEVA CARTER S Y 277.85 .00 277.85 2711921340043 7012 HALIFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1374 101318000301 MARCUS ELLING S Y 243.79 .00 243.79 2711921340044 7018 HALIFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1374 101361000903 ROLAND FLOMO S Y 269.81 .00 269.81 2711921310099 4106 71ST AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1305 101423000503 JOHN J GABRIEL S Y 111.62 .00 111.62 2711921340013 6913 HALIFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1373 101451010906 ALBRECHT LTD S Y 247.16 .00 247.16 2711921330091 7066 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1370 0 0 0 CURRENT CER' CATION REPORT 11-FEE-2002 (09:47age 8 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 101466000304 KIMBERLY PERKINS S Y 238.82 .00 238.82 2711921320052 7236 NOBLE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1221 101478000902 TALATA BAYSAH S Y 365.04 .00 365.04 2811921410140 4706 WINGARD LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1231 101534000103 LARRY SAAS S Y 186.08 .00 186.08 2711921320005 7230 LEE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1336 101534000103 FRANCIS SAAS 2 Y 2711921320005 7230 LEE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1336 101552000803 BRETT CORBITT S Y 118.29 .00 118.29 2711921320093 7130 KYLE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1328 101624040809 KRAIG KUTZ S Y 90.13 .00 90.13 3411921110014 6837 YORK PL BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-4208 101631010202 KEITH HOWARD S Y 51.17 .00 51.17 3511921220042 2904 67TH LN N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1732 101632180214 BRUCE HUNDLEY S Y 81.62 .00 81.62 3511921230030 2825 67TH LN N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1712 211023000602 YOLANDA SMITH S Y 219.71 .00 219.71 2611921420099 7243 OLIVER AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1049 211028040704 PATRICIA STEPHENSON S Y 117.11 .00 117.11 2124 73RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55444-2337 211028040704 CITY OF BROOKLYN PK C Y 5200 85TH AVE N BROOKLYN PARK MN 55443-4301 211042000302 DWAYNE FLEMING S Y 98.39 .00 98.39 2611921420092 2106 71ST AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1008 211045000001 ALLAN THIELEN S Y 253.75 .00 253.75 2611921430094 7028 OLIVER AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1053 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 9 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 211064000601 DOUGLAS BRUESHABER S Y 110.91 .00 110.91 2611921430026 6925 NEWTON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1036 211065000503 THERESA YURECKO S Y 255.75 .00 255.75 2611921430025 6931 NEWTON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1036 211078000013 DRAKE M BELL S Y 107.38 .00 107.38 2611921430077 2101 71ST AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1007 211106000607 MARK ROTTACH S Y 332 .88 .00 332.88 2611921420048 7124 NEWTON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1041 211106000607 BARBARA ROTTACH 2 Y 2611921420048 7124 NEWTON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 211107000503 MARK EDSON S Y 225.04 .00 225.04 2611921420047 7118 NEWTON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1041 211116000402 ERIC RUIKKA S Y 98.71 .00 98.71 2611921430070 7006 NEWTON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1039 211134000202 STEPHANIE STOLTMAN S Y 201.74 .00 201.74 2611921430064 7001 MORGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1030 211147000701 DEAN W. ANDERSON S Y 256.32 .00 256.32 2611921420037 7137 MORGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1032 211157000403 KATHY ROSS S Y 309.20 .00 309.20 2611921420053 7243 MORGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1034 211189000608 CARL OSTERLUND S Y 194.26 .00 194.26 2611921430007 6900 MORGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1029 211189000608 DANNIELLE BRITTS 2 Y 2611921430007 6900 MORGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1029 211194000904 LEON SMITH S Y 219.38 .00 219.38 2611921430002 6927 LOGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1020 CURRENT CERCATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:470age 10 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID 211198000501 JOHN L WEBB S Y 205.30 .00 205.30 2611921430046 7001 LOGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1022 211204000703 JUDY RICE S N 407.53 .00 407.53 2611921430040 7037 LOGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1022 211204000703 TRACY RICE 0 Y 2611921430040 P 0 BOX 2557 BAXTER MN 56425-2557 211210000903 LANCE COOPER S Y 392.07 .00 392.07 2611921420020 7131 LOGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MR 55430-1024 211278000808 SEAN WILLIAMSON S Y 178.22 .00 178.22 2611921440089 1820 IRVING LA N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1014 211289000507 RESIDENT S N 263.45 .00 263 .45 3511921110033 1513 HUMBOLDT PL N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1714 211289000507 DAYSTAR INVESTMENT O Y 3511921110033 17799 4300 KENWOOD TRAIL LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 211289010408 DAYSTAR INV CO S N 267.88 .00 267.88 3511921110032 1519 HUMBOLDT PL N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1714 211289010408 DAYSTAR INVESTMENT 0 Y 3511921110032 17799 290 KENWOOD TRAIL LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 211290010106 REBEKAH L CROSS S N 327.83 .00 327.83 3511921110028 1549 HUMBOLDT PL N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1714 211290010106 DAYSTAR INVESTMENTS O Y 3511921110028 17799 4300 KENWOOD TRAIL LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 211290020005 RESIDENT S N 299.57 .00 299.57 3511921110027 1543 HUMBOLDT PL N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1714 211290020005 MORNINGSUN INV 0 Y 3511921110027 17799 4300 KENWOOD TRAIL LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 11 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 211290030905 MICHAEL FORD S N 238.12 .00 238.12 3511921110026 1537 HUMBOLDT PL N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1714 211290030905 MORNINGSUN INVEST. 0 Y 3511921110026 17799 300 KENWOOD TR LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 211290030905 KWI-HA WONG 2 Y 3511921110026 17799 300 KENWOOD TR LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 211291000107 SHIRLEY COLE S N 335.79 .00 335.79 3511921110031 1525 HUMBOLDT PL N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1714 211291000107 MORNINGSUN INV 0 Y 3511921110031 17799 #300 KENWOOD TRAIL LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 211291010006 JEROME BOGAR S N 214.65 .00 214.65 3511921110030 1531 HUMBOLDT PL N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1714 211291010006 MORNINGSUN INV. 0 Y 3511921110030 17799 KENWOOD TRAIL LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 211309000101 DEBBIE LARSON S N 270.20 .00 270.20 2611921440033 7031 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1161 211309000101 MRS. FRANK GREGORY 0 Y 2611921440033 7031 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1161 211324000205 TIM FEZLER S Y 238.34 .00 238.34 2611921440054 7006 IRVING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1160 211330000401 GALE ANDERSON S Y 267.28 .00 267.28 2611921440063 7025 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1152 211349000302 CHARLOTTE BRAUN S Y 163.61 .00 163 .61 2611921410022 1607 AMY LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1134 211402000704 PAUL CAVALLARO S Y 347.13 .00 347.13 2611921440021 7013 KNOX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1015 CURRENT CERCATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) 0age 12 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID 211428000704 HARLAN HANNINEN S Y 329.26 .00 329.26 1516 73RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55444-2439 211428000704 CITY OF BROOKLYN PK C Y 5200 85TH AVE N BROOKLYN PARK MN 55443-4301 211440000107 SHARON MURPHY S Y 278.42 .00 278.42 2611921410105 7236 KNOX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1019 211457000106 JASON PITTS S Y 386.82 .00 386.82 2611921410060 1619 WOODBINE LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1062 211478000602 CHARLES HOTT S Y 379.69 .00 379.69 2611921410039 1701 72ND AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1058 212006000503 WILLIAM CORWIN S Y 199.20 .00 199.20 2511921320056 7212 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1157 212056000401 DARRELL NOWAK S Y 171.40 .00 171.40 2511921320033 1400 72ND AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1125 212062000603 GARY NOVOTNY S Y 108.09 .00 108.09 2511921320027 7225 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1148 212065000303 ERIC HAINEY S Y 244.16 .00 244.16 2511921320017 1401 73RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55444-2657 212082000202 HELEN LEWIS S Y 250.14 .00 250.14 2511921320050 7112 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1147 212084000003 VICTORIA FLOMO S Y 242.59 .00 242.59 2511921320048 7100 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1147 212115000304 EDWINA MCGILL S Y 185.30 .00 185.30 2511921330059 7037 FREMONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1138 212121000508 BRENDA ROBERTS S Y 66.90 .00 66.90 2511921320043 1301 72ND AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1122 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 13 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 212122000402 TIMOTHY WHITE S Y 97.68 .00 97.68 2511921320021 1300 72ND AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1123 212123000301 MICHAEL MILLER S Y 130.54 .00 130.54 2511921320020 7203 FREMONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1142 212134000001 LAN OLLILA S Y 98.71 .00 98.71 2511921320005 7224 FREMONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1143 212140000203 GREG LARSON S Y 206.38 .00 206.38 2511921320087 7136 FREMONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1141 212154000506 HOWARD CALVIN S Y 141.34 .00 141.34 2511921330035 7006 FREMONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1139 212154000506 MARY CALVIN 2 Y 2511921330035 7006 FREMONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1139 212165000206 DAVID FIEDLER S Y 244.23 .00 244.23 2511921320088 7049 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1106 212188000504 JOHN A LITZAU S Y 265.08 .00 265.08 2511921320109 7218 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1109 212193000804 NANCY BOYCE S Y 81.62 .00 81.62 2511921320093 7048 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1107 212228000702 ROBERT JANSEN S Y 274.36 .00 274.36 2511921320104 7201 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1215 212235000802 JERROD A GATES S Y 111.83 .00 111.83 2511921320097 7243 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1215 212235000802 HEATHER GATES 2 Y 2511921320097 7243 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1215 212239000404 RICK PHA S Y 65.59 .00 65.59 2511921320001 1101 73RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55444-2652 9 0 9 CURRENT CER*CATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47)page 14 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 212246010404 STEPHEN DUBOIS S N 217.58 .00 217.58 2511921310095 1013 73RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55444-2650 212246010404 STEPHEN DUBOIS B Y 2511921310095 102 2 1ST ST NE GLENWOOD MN 56334-1201 212255000302 JOE SCHUTZ S Y 105.18 .00 105.18 2511921310086 801 73RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55444-2646 212258060404 KEVIN BELILLE S Y 68.20 .00 68.20 632 73RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55444-2643 212258060404 CITY OF BROOKLYN PK C Y 5200 85TH AVE N BROOKLYN PARK MN 55443-4301 212268000803 DONALD R HEATH S Y 208.41 .00 208.41 2511921310011 824 WOODBINE LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1220 212301000704 KEVIN J O'HARA S Y 216.63 .00 216.63 2511921310040 7212 ALDRICH CT BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1206 215003000104 SHAHEEM HAUSER S Y 308.22 .00 308.22 2511921430039 6926 WEST RIVER RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1328 215035030003 KUE VUE S Y 348.15 .00 348.15 332 73RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1300 215035030003 CITY OF BROOKLYN PAR K C Y 5200 85TH AVE N BROOKLYN PARK MN 55443-4301 215035080505 JUDY KYKER S Y 84.38 .00 84.38 320 73RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1300 215035080505 CITY OF BROOKLYN PK C Y 5200 85TH AVE N BROOKLYN PARK MN 55443-4301 215042000403 DAN WHITTENBURG S Y 87.51 .00 87.51 2511921420039 7211 DALLAS RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1315 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 15 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 215042000403 KERI WHITTENBURG 2 Y 87.51 .00 87.51 2511921420039 7211 DALLAS RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1315 215046000001 EUGENE T BARRY S Y 299.79 .00 299.79 2511921420017 7119 DALLAS RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1313 215062000902 YER YANG S Y 343 .35 .00 343 .35 2511921420011 7208 DALLAS RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1316 215100050801 DUANE WELTON S Y 314.40 .00 314.40 308 73RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1300 215100050801 CITY OF BROOKLYN PK C Y 5200 85TH AVE N BROOKLYN PARK MN 55443-4301 215152000001 LUCILLE FORCELLE S Y 93.32 .00 93.32 2511921440011 6924 WILLOW LA N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1340 215641000906 CHARLES PERRO S Y 164.48 .00 164.48 3611921130026 419 67TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1613 215641000906 SUSAN PERRO 2 Y 3611921130026 419 67TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1613 215670020105 MONA MOORHEAD S Y 223.67 .00 223.67 3611921130087 6644 CAMDEN DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1631 215670070603 FOLKE BAXTER S Y 191.13 .00 191.13 3611921130092 6630 CAMDEN DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1631 215671080405 DWAYNE HILL S Y 297.29 .00 297.29 3611921130102 6609 CAMDEN DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1630 215671080405 MELANIE HILL 2 Y 3611921130102 6609 CAMDEN DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1630 215671090304 MOHAMED JALLOH S Y 262.47 .00 262.47 3611921130103 6605 CAMDEN DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1630 9 0 9 CURRENT CERCATION REPORT 0 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) 0age 16 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 215680000103 BEVERLY M LIND S Y 152.72 .00 152 .72 3611921120039 6731 5TH ST N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1602 215699000003 JAN SCHOLLA S Y 247.72 .00 247.72 3611921120048 6700 CAMDEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1629 215776000606 LESLIE WILLIAMS S Y 271.00 .00 271.00 3611921210041 6712 COLFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1516 215905000002 LONNIE WHITLOCK S Y 208.25 .00 208.25 3611921210050 6707 COLFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1515 215906000904 KENNETH R KING S Y 259.17 .00 259.17 3611921210049 6713 COLFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1515 215910000301 JOHN KRAUSE S Y 90.09 .00 90.09 3611921210045 6737 COLFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1515 215913000006 JOVETTE HANKINS S Y 334 .32 .00 334.32 3611921210116 6811 COLFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1517 215921000002 ZAKARIA ADEM S Y 128.00 .00 128.00 3611921210065 6830 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1522 215923000807 THEODORE D SAKARIASON S Y 168.37 .00 168.37 3611921210063 6818 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1522 215930000904 DOUGLAS MOORE S Y 376.07 .00 376.07 3611921210056 6724 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1520 215935000404 ALYN EASTIN S Y 222.76 .00 222.76 3611921240045 6642 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1808 215942000504 WESLEY DEFREITAS S Y 335.51 .00 335.51 3611921240038 6600 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1808 216005000702 JOHN E. LEE S Y 124.83 .00 124.83 3611921220035 6733 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1523 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 17 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 216009000302 JOHN SOLOMON S Y 416.41 .00 416.41 3611921220031 6819 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1525 216011000903 JESTIN STEINBACH S Y 256.04 .00 256.04 3611921220029 6831 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1525 216017010206 FLORENCE NWOSU S Y 104.85 .00 104.85 3611921220079 6805 FREMONT PL N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1583 216017100105 LUANNE ANDERSON S Y 273.66 .00 273.66 3611921220119 1339 67TH LN N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1587 216018190109 SONDRA MAYES S N 221.30 .00 221.30 3611921220059 1316 68TH LN N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1584 216018190109 VALERIE BLOUNT-MCKISSACK B Y 3611921220059 3617 DOUGLAS DR CRYSTAL MN 55422-1928 216019030802 THOMAS 0 OMAO S Y 157.08 .00 157.08 3611921220070 6836 FREMONT PL N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1582 216019070406 ALYSSA M CARTER S Y 245.92 .00 245.92 3611921220074 6820 FREMONT PL N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1590 216019100903 MARCUS MAYS S Y 239.39 .00 239.39 3611921220077 6804 FREMONT PL N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1590 216024000405 MORNINGSUN INV S N 341.76 .00 341.76 3511921110018 6749 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1533 216024000405 MORNINGSUN INV 0 Y 3511921110018 17799 KENWOOD TRAIL LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 216024000405 WONG KWI-HA 2 Y 3511921110018 17799 KENWOOD TRAIL LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 216024020203 MORNINGSUN INVEST. S N 266.57 .00 266.57 3511921110020 6761 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1533 Is 0 0 CURRENT CER*CATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) ,age 18 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 216024020203 MORNINGSUN INVESTMEN TS B Y 266.57 .00 266.57 3511921110020 17799 300 KENWOOD TRAIL LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 216025000303 MORNINGSUN INVEST. S N 954.24 .00 954.24 3511921110019 6757 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1533 216025000303 MORNINGSUN INVEST. B Y 3511921110019 17799 300 KENWOOD TRAIL LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 216025000303 KWI-HA WONG 2 Y 3511921110019 17799 300 KENWOOD TRAIL LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 216025010207 MORNINGSUN INV. S N 348.44 .00 348.44 3511921110022 6765 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1533 216025010207 MORNINGSUN INV. B Y 3511921110022 17799 300 KENWOOD TRAIL LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 216025030003 OCCUPANT/RESIDENT S N 293 .46 .00 293 .46 3511921110023 6773 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1533 216025030003 MORNINGSUN INV CO B Y 3511921110023 17799 300 KENWOOD TRAIL LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 216025030003 KWI-HA WONG 2 Y 3511921110023 17799 300 KENWOOD TRAIL LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9493 216101000002 TIMOTHY FRANKLIN S Y 220.23 .00 220.23 3611921210079 6718 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1512 216122000504 JUANITA HILL S Y 523.14 .00 523.14 3611921210100 6719 CAMDEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1628 301723000802 LARRY PODGORAK S Y 295.50 .00 295.50 3311921430070 5212 62ND AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2360 301733000604 KHANG V YANG S Y 78.93 .00 78.93 3311921430065 5319 BOULDER LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2304 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 19 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 301733000604 FUE VANG 2 Y 78.93 .00 78.93 3311921430065 5319 BOULDER LANE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 301733000604 VANG SIONG C Y 3311921430065 5319 BOULDER LANE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 301793000302 DEBORAH J NETT S Y 264.69 .00 264.69 3311921440057 6142 REGENT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2352 301800000403 KENNETH R LUKE S Y 188.73 .00 188.73 3311921440033 6113 QUAIL AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2347 301838000002 EXODUS COMM DEV CORP S Y 1092.47 .00 1092.47 3311921440010 4801 63RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2339 301838000002 EXODUS COMM DEV CORP B Y 3311921440010 3644 CHICAGO AVE S MPLS MN 55407-2604 301862000902 KATIE HUGHES S Y 299.82 .00 299.82 3311921430039 6125 SCOTT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2355 301886000102 DONNA JUNGERS S Y 458.76 .00 458.76 3311921130079 6523 UNITY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2076 301897000802 JEFFREY TONE S Y 177.87 .00 177.87 3311921130068 5300 HOWE LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1632 301902000103 JOHN T. BARTKO S Y 127.60 .00 127.60 3311921130063 5206 HOWE LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1630 301905000802 CHARLES R TURNER S Y 194.61 .00 194.61 3311921130060 5124 HOWE LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1628 301987000903 JED RANCOUR S Y 251.80 .00 251.80 3311921130014 6524 UNITY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2075 302010000802 PAUL MCCORMICK S Y 198.06 .00 198.06 3311921130031 5119 WINCHESTER LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1640 0 to 0 CURRENT CEACATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) gage 20 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID 302020000602 DANIEL ARNDT S Y 188.43 .00 188.43 3311921130041 5307 WINCHESTER LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1644 302026000002 MRS TIM ASLESON S Y 213.82 .00 213 .82 3311921130047 5224 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2013 302042000002 MALLOY JEANNE S Y 277.30 .00 277.30 3311921140036 4906 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2007 302045000704 DAVID YOCUM S Y 121.55 .00 121.55 3311921140039 6513 PERRY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1648 302074000103 SHARRON DAVIS S N 162.13 .00 162.13 3311921420003 5112 63RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2330 302074000103 SHARON DAVIS C Y 3311921420003 758 66TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 302074000103 MARY GREENE C Y 3311921420003 5112 63RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 302083000002 STEVEN MAGNUSON S Y 210.38 .00 210.38 3311921410092 6328 QUAIL AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2066 302103000602 KENNETH PETRIE S Y 349.05 .00 349.05 3311921410120 6345 QUAIL AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2065 302134000902 STEPHEN J SHOPEK S Y 116.71 .00 116.71 3311921420021 6400 SCOTT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2035 302172000203 SCOTT MCCABE S Y 103.52 .00 103.52 3311921420063 6413 TOLEDO AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2036 302188000403 BEVERLY KILLEBREW S Y 171.03 .00 171.03 3311921420079 5318 ELEANOR LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2023 302197000303 CHRIS PAULSEN S Y 103.03 .00 103 .03 3311921420088 6418 UNITY AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2041 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 21 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 302245000503 JOHN TAYLOR S Y 110.86 .00 110.86 3311921410039 6343 ORCHARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2057 302245000503 GLADYS TAYLOR 2 Y 3311921410039 6343 ORCHARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2057 302250000701 WILLIAM A HILL S Y 417.38 .00 417.38 3311921410044 6313 ORCHARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2057 302260000501 RONALD RICHARD S Y 150.54 .00 150.54 3311921410016 6342 ORCHARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2058 302274000903 ERICK BATES S Y 86.02 .00 86.02 3311921410006 6413 NOBLE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2055 302282000903 ARTHUR GOODMAN S Y 81.62 .00 81.62 3311921410025 4701 ELEANOR LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2051 302282000903 JANICE GOODMAN 2 Y 3311921410025 4701 ELEANOR LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 302295000403 JON L HUDLOW S Y 279.87 .00 279.87 3411921320019 6431 MAJOR AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2134 302300000702 JAMES CAPLES S Y 232.74 .00 232 .74 3411921320024 6401 MAJOR AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2134 302305000201 RODGER LEE CAREY S Y 425.63 .00 425.63 3411921320037 4513 64TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2102 302312000305 CHARLES HARGROVE S Y 114.28 .00 114.28 3411921320014 6424 MAJOR AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2135 302312000305 ROSA HARGROVE 2 Y 3411921320014 6424 MAJOR AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2135 302322000102 JOSEPH SCHORN S Y 317.78 .00 317.78 3411921320008 6401 LEE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2132 0 9 9 CURRENT CEROCATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47)We 22 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID 302336000504 MICHAEL MEDINA S Y 242.72 .00 242.72 3411921320055 4521 KATHRENE DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2152 302336000504 DAWN MEDINA 2 Y 3411921320055 4521 KATHRENE DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 302422000004 RANDAL GEROLD S Y 184.25 .00 184.25 3411921330047 6231 LEE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2477 302579000105 ALAN STROH S N 213 .63 .00 213.63 3411921320079 6325 KYLE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2128 302579000105 BEVERLY COOPER 0 Y 3411921320079 4325 ZANE AVE N CRYSTAL MN 55422-1057 302581000705 GILFORD SUNDEEN S Y 192.08 .00 192 .08 3411921320081 6313 KYLE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2128 302631000704 GILBERT N YANG S Y 121.66 .00 121.66 3411921320107 6442 KYLE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2131 302678000103 R J COFER S Y 222.29 .00 222.29 0311821210105 3818 61ST AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2402 302678000103 PAUL M RODGERS 2 Y 0311821210105 3818 61ST AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2402 302718000304 STEVEN LARSON S Y 223 .23 .00 223.23 3411921340016 3806 JANET LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-4012 302719000206 GABRIEL SAYEE S Y 192.08 .00 192.08 3411921340017 6121 FRANCE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-4042 302795000902 BYRON J HILL S Y 91.17 .00 91.17 3411921340122 4001 63RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2140 302802000002 ROBERT BOLDEN S N 295.61 .00 295.61 3411921340115 4201 63RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2144 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 23 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 302802000002 NAOMI LAWSON B Y 295.61 .00 295.61 3411921340115 4201 63RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2144 302804000805 DIANA HUNTER S Y 223.39 .00 223.39 3411921340113 4213 63RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2144 302808000402 ERIC BENNETT S Y 204.05 .00 204.05 3411921310050 6312 JUNE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2125 302842000203 BRUCE DEARMON S Y 131.49 .00 131.49 3411921310096 6324 INDIANA AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2121 302850000104 KENNETH OLSON S Y 99.88 .00 99.88 3411921310089 6430 MARLIN DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2163 302881000405 QUENTIN MCDERMID S Y 94.40 .00 94.40 3411921230062 4400 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2110 302886000902 VICKIE WHALEY S Y 296.54 .00 296.54 3411921230081 4506 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2112 302887000804 CHARITY ROBINSON S Y 237.44 .00 237.44 3411921230080 4512 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2112 302887000804 MYRON ROBINSON 2 Y 3411921230080 4512 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2112 302888000703 ERNEST M ANYANWU S Y 222.18 .00 222.18 3411921230079 4518 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2112 302888000703 BLESSING U ANYANWU 2 Y 3411921230079 4518 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2112 302895000803 JAY STROM S Y 81.62 .00 81.62 3311921140010 4712 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2050 302907000402 WILLIAM SCHMIDT S Y 106.30 .00 106.30 3411921230073 4613 WINCHESTER LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1727 CURRENT CERCATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47)oage 24 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 302914000503 SULANDER S Y 205.72 .00 205.72 3411921230058 4419 WINCHESTER LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1723 302918000102 MARK HENKELS S Y 94.40 .00 94.40 3411921230054 4319 WINCHESTER LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1721 302931000402 CARRIE BLAISDELL S Y 93.41 .00 93.41 3411921240041 4200 WINCHESTER LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1720 302933000204 KRISTINE E PEDERSON S Y 241.56 .00 241.56 3411921240039 4212 WINCHESTER LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1720 302943000002 HECTOR J ALVARADO S Y 268.22 .00 268.22 3411921230034 4500 WINCHESTER LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1726 302943000002 MARGARITA CONTRERAS 2 Y 3411921230034 4500 WINCHESTER LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1726 302962000602 JUDD ANDERSON S Y 116.01 .00 116.01 3411921230039 4401 66TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1705 302978000804 ANDREW FANNING S Y 90.13 .00 90.13 3411921240030 4224 66TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1702 303057000006 CHRISTINA ADAMS S Y 81.95 .00 81.95 3411921130093 6607 EWING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1852 303057000006 JESSIE ADAMS 2 Y 3411921130093 6607 EWING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1852 303058010802 DON OLEK S Y 75.80 .00 75.80 3411921130085 6612 EWING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1853 303059000802 WALLACE H AMSLER JR S Y 215.00 .00 215.00 3411921130021 3608 66TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1800 303074000902 D & J HILSTROM S Y 195.09 .00 195.09 3411921130059 3509 66TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1811 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 25 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 303106000105 CHRIS PATTERSON S Y 205.67 .00 205.67 3411921130072 6524 CHOWEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1843 303106000105 WENDY PATTERSON 2 Y 3411921130072 6524 CHOWEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1843 303118000706 JANIS SALO S Y 97.68 .00 97.68 3411921130060 6543 BEARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1827 303119000602 MARILYN KIMKER S Y 198.33 .00 198.33 3411921130012 3400 66TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1810 303144000504 EDITH ZEAH S Y 86.04 .00 86.04 3411921310004 6349 HALIFAX DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2118 303149000003 ADRIAN ARNOLD S Y 202.91 .00 202.91 3411921310009 6329 HALIFAX DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2118 303149000003 GLORIA ARNOLD 2 Y 3411921310009 6329 HALIFAX DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2118 303172000006 ERIC DUPLESSIE S Y 197.82 .00 197.82 3411921420008 6300 FRANCE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2115 303180000010 BRIAN LEE S N 86.02 .00 86.02 3411921420006 6315 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2173 303180000010 JOSEPH BRAUER B Y 3411921420006 P 0 BOX 1109 MPLS MN 55440-1109 303182000801 M DONALD BLOM S Y 133.07 .00 133.07 3411921420007 6301 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2173 408649000205 DEAN DUNN S Y 178.34 .00 178.34 0211821140021 5807 KNOX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2649 408668000802 JOEL MORRISSETTE S Y 213.26 .00 213.26 0211821140017 5834 KNOX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2650 0 CURRENT CERICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) 0age 26 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 408669000703 DANIEL WILCOWSKI S Y 220.13 .00 220.13 0211821140018 5840 KNOX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2650 408669000703 LORI WILCOWSKI 2 Y 0211821140018 5840 KNOX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2650 408676000801 JEFFERY J HANSON S Y 120.18 .00 120.18 0211821140029 5815 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2647 408694000603 WILLIAM STAGE S Y 96.56 .00 96.56 0211821140050 5806 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2648 408703000502 MARK OKEEFE S Y 289.41 .00 289.41 0211821140043 5831 IRVING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2643 408710000605 KIMBERLY WOODFORD S Y 247.35 .00 247.35 0211821140058 5737 IRVING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2641 408710000605 SANDRA WOODFORD 2 Y 0211821140058 5825 74TH AVE N BROOKLYN PARK MN 55443-3134 408710000605 ROGER WOODFORD C Y 0211821140058 5825 74TH AVE N BROOKLYN PARK MN 55443-3135 408715000102 J LEWANDOWSKI S Y 319.29 .00 319.29 0211821140079 5701 IRVING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2641 408767000806 AHMED MOHAMUD S Y 219.43 .00 219.43 0111821220087 6014 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2640 408785000602 RAY WARREN S Y 278.12 .00 278.12 0111821220073 6026 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2634 408792000704 SALENA HATCHER S Y 112 .62 .00 112.62 3611921330014 6120 LILAC DR N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2239 408803000402 STEVEN C BAKER S Y 101.75 .00 101.75 0111821220067 6007 FREMONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2629 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 27 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 408824000902 JEFFREY ANDERSON S Y 270.84 .00 270.84 0111821230042 5730 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2661 408835000604 RESIDENT S N 333.59 .00 333.59 0111821230087 5743 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2660 408835000604 TRINA L WARD 0 Y 0111821230087 1263 VANBUREN ST PAUL MN 55104-2015 408846000302 MYRTLE/ROBIN HALL S Y 105.25 .00 105.25 0111821230034 5730 FREMONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2659 408887000303 C HAYES S Y 154.36 .00 154.36 3611921330017 1112 62ND AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2209 408901000502 WILLIAM CRONKHITE S Y 212.56 .00 212 .56 0111821220051 6013 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2624 408922000005 M OPARE-ADDO S Y 92.25 .00 92.25 0111821230032 5725 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2656 408923000904 RIO HOT PROPERTIES S N 191.96 .00 191.96 0111821230017 5715 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2656 408923000904 RIO HOT PROPERTIES B Y 0111821230017 3801 QUEEN AVE N MPLS MN 55412-1911 408926000603 CARMEN IGBINOBA S Y 61.53 .00 61.53 0111821230026 1108 57TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2755 408926000603 GLORIA FOSTER 2 Y 0111821230026 1108 57TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 408926000603 HAROLD FOSTER C Y 0111821230026 1108 57TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 408926000604 HAROLD FOSTER S N 132.41 .00 132.41 0111821230026 1108 57TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2755 9 0 0 CURRENT CER O CATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) age 28 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 408927000501 CURTIS G HOFFMAN S Y 272.84 .00 272.84 0111821230027 5706 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2657 408941000703 DOUGLAS KALTVED S Y 99.88 .00 99.88 0111821220010 5910 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2623 408941000703 MARIT KALTVED 2 Y 0111821220010 5910 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2623 408949000904 SHANNON GOODRICH S Y 92.62 .00 92 .62 0111821220039 6006 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2625 408949000904 VICTOR GOODRICH 2 Y 0111821220039 6006 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2625 408957000802 CRANSTON ROLLINS S Y 270.28 .00 270.28 3611921330026 6106 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2235 408963000005 LARRY SCHULTZ S Y 251.74 .00 251.74 3611921330020 6125 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2227 409007000602 TIMOTHY DEHN S Y 107.43 .00 107.43 0111821240027 5816 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2746 409010000102 CHRIS BATEMAN S Y 214.57 .00 214.57 0111821240030 5840 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2746 409026000302 LARRY S PAGE S Y 239.78 .00 239.78 0111821210048 6030 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2750 409061000903 RAYMOND BISHOP S Y 264.22 .00 264.22 0111821210016 6007 COLFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2738 409073000503 DOUG FINSETH S Y 210.00 .00 210.00 0111821240019 5841 COLFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2734 409075000304 ALIMON HILL S N 253.04 .00 253.04 0111821240021 5825 COLFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2734 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 29 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 409075000304 BEULAH HILL 0 Y 253.04 .00 253.04 0111821240021 3853 4TH AVE S MPLS MN 55409-1309 409127000105 DARYL BOEHNER S Y 42.36 .00 42.36 3611921340049 6225 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2216 409127000105 DIANE BOEHNER 2 Y 3611921340049 6225 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2216 409162000705 JOHN E KELLEY S Y 185.99 .00 185.99 0111821240049 5759 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2757 409166000305 DAN SHINNICK S Y 233.09 .00 233.09 0111821240061 5713 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2757 409176000101 JANET JOHNSON S Y 238.93 .00 238.93 0111821240062 5700 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2758 409206000502 MARK MOLNAU S Y 236.93 .00 236.93 0111821210085 6040 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2726 409209000202 BILL KOLBE S Y 183.14 .00 183.14 3611921340012 6114 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2215 409211000804 ROBERT LAYSON S Y 113.81 .00 113 .81 3611921340014 6130 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2215 409231000402 LINDA WOOLEVER S Y 131.93 .00 131.93 3611921340007 6123 ALDRICH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2211 409231000402 MICHAEL WOOLEVER 2 Y 3611921340007 6123 ALDRICH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2211 409233000202 MONICA SHOCKENCY S Y 280.43 .00 280.43 3611921340096 6107 ALDRICH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2211 409235000002 KRISTEN RYAN S Y 296.37 .00 296.37 0111821210078 6043 ALDRICH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2719 CURRENT CERCATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47)lage 30 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 409255000503 PATRICK TYSON S Y 205.44 .00 205.44 0111821240088 5829 ALDRICH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2715 409255000503 KAREN TYSON 2 Y 0111821240088 5829 ALDRICH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2715 409289000502 MICHAEL MCCOY S Y 187.61 .00 187.61 0111821210026 5942 ALDRICH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2718 409391000002 DEBBIE STEWART S Y 270.66 .00 270.66 3611921430025 506 61ST AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2202 409397000406 RENEE KLICK S Y 135.37 .00 135.37 0111821120031 6023 LYNDALE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2743 409429000604 DAVID REYES S Y 201.48 .00 201.48 0111821130045 5700 CAMDEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2728 409466000005 KELLY KNUTSON S Y 81.63 .00 81.63 0111821240075 5827 CAMDEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2729 409887000102 TED FLAVION S Y 239.04 .00 239.04 3611921320076 6412 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1838 409911000108 WUENSCH S Y 477.91 .00 477.91 3611921320050 6400 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1836 409953000002 STEVEN CUNNINGHAM S Y 229.72 .00 229.72 3611921320009 6337 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1825 409989000802 AUDREY HEAVENS S Y 293.57 .00 293.57 3611921310032 1001 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1812 410003000803 DAVID CHOUINARD S Y 82.72 .00 82.72 3611921310018 6336 COLFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1818 410015000401 GLADYS TERRY S Y 259.42 .00 259.42 3611921310022 6435 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1802 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 31 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 410090000201 CROWN BRAWLEY LLC S N 635.71 .00 635.71 3611921130119 615 66TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1644 410090000201 CROWN BRAWLEY LLC B Y 3611921130119 1776 MAPLE LANE ROSEVILLE MN 55113-1426 410093010802 CROWN BRAWLEY LLC S N 648.63 .00 648.63 3611921420020 6330 CAMDEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1965 410093010802 CROWN BRAWLEY LLC O Y 3611921420020 1776 MAPLE LANE ROSEVILLE MN 55113-1426 410100000002 SHEILA DOELY S N 198.08 .00 198.08 3611921330063 1201 63RD LA N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1864 410100000002 DORIS TEICHNER B Y 3611921330063 2165 131ST LA NW COON RAPIDS MN 55448-2555 410113000504 BONNIE JUDE S Y 81.62 .00 81.62 3611921330076 1315 63RD LA N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1865 410127000904 LEROY KENNEDY III S Y 93.41 .00 93.41 3611921330090 1421 63RD LA N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1866 410128001601 BRUTGER CO S N 90.86 .00 90.86 1101 63RD LA N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1863 410128001601 BROOKWOOD TWNHSE B Y PO BOX 29742 BRKLYN CNTR MN 55429-0742 503223000403 TONG VANG S Y 360.38 .00 360.38 3411921140060 3125 66TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1803 503223000403 BILL VANG 2 Y 3411921140060 3125 66TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-1803 503223000403 BAO CHANG B Y 3411921140060 3125 66TH AVE NO BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 CURRENT CEACATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47)lage 32 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID 503234000105 DAVID GLAUVITZ S Y 208.64 .00 208.64 3411921140071 3300 QUARLES RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2254 503249000403 ROBERT W STRAUCH S Y 277.34 .00 277.34 3411921410126 3013 QUARLES RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2247 503249000403 LISA STRAUCH 2 Y 3411921410126 3013 QUARLES RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2247 503251000903 JD&JW JOHNSON S Y 273.92 .00 273.92 3411921140084 3025 QUARLES RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2247 503271000501 WALTER S JEGELA S Y 207.26 .00 207.26 3411921140029 3206 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2279 503271000501 GERTRUDE HAMERNICK 2 Y 3411921140029 3206 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2279 503274000204 PENNY HICKS S Y 169.21 .00 169.21 3411921410102 3112 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2243 503288000603 DJAMAL KATABA S Y 127.78 .00 127.78 3411921410113 3113 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2242 503291000103 CHIA HANG S Y 667.16 .00 667.16 3411921410116 3201 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2244 503305000503 JOSE C ROSARIO S Y 260.23 .00 260.23 3411921410027 3212 64TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2237 503305000503 ANGIE M ROSARIO 2 Y 3411921410027 3212 64TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2237 503350000904 JAMES GENADEK S Y 213 .63 .00 213.63 3411921410080 6307 XERXES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2049 503352000702 BRET NORDSTROM S Y 50.38 .00 50.38 3411921410082 3013 OHENRY RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2220 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 33 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 503376000908 BECKY MCDERMOTT S Y 146.15 .00 146.15 3411921410094 3313 OHENRY RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2226 503381000202 DIANNA P SPEARS S Y 279.94 .00 279.94 3411921410013 3300 63RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2208 503408000104 NICOLE STEWART S Y 209.67 .00 209.67 3511921320085 6309 BROOKLYN DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2024 503414000302 STEVEN NELSON S Y 197.45 .00 197.45 3511921320091 2801 OHENRY RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2041 503414000302 SUSAN NELSON 2 Y 3511921320091 2801 OHENRY RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2041 503434000906 DALE CERNOHLAVEK S Y 229.67 .00 229.67 3511921320082 2700 OHENRY RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2040 503445000606 CYNTHIA MEIER S Y 218.13 .00 218.13 3511921320062 2801 64TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2010 503473000103 KERRY M ANONSEN S Y 163.03 .00 163 .03 3511921320021 2613 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2014 503476000804 ALEXANDER JAMES S Y 111.29 .00 111.29 3511921320024 2701 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2016 503476000804 MARCALLINA JAMES 2 Y 3511921320024 2701 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2016 503482000005 BRIDGID MAGEL S Y 242.20 .00 242.20 3511921320030 2813 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2018 503490000001 HENRY R SCHWARTZ S Y 136.42 .00 136.42 3511921320017 2906 65TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2021 503510010502 STEVEN VONSEG S Y 292.29 .00 292.29 3511921230005 2806 66TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-1716 0 0 0 CURRENT CER*CATION REPORT 9 11-FEB-2002 (09:47 0ge 34 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 503510010502 SEENGBEUAN PHILAPHON 2 Y 292 .29 .00 292.29 3511921230005 2806 66TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 503548000206 AKIN DAVIS S Y 164.80 .00 164.80 3411921440106 3109 LAWRENCE RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2633 503559000802 KENNETH CHRISTIANS S Y 328.45 .00 328.45 3411921440118 3309 LAWRENCE RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2637 503577000605 RICK PETERSON S Y 254.14 .00 254.14 3411921440078 3119 62ND AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2614 503595000404 UT NGUYEN S N 268.73 .00 268.73 3411921430026 3412 62ND AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2621 503595000404 THAI SON NAM B Y 3411921430026 3412 62ND AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2621 503699000901 THELBERT WILKERSON S Y 301.83 .00 301.83 3411921440006 3107 63RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2203 503728000404 ROSE SANKAWULO S Y 173 .80 .00 173.80 3411921430031 6206 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-4034 503729000302 LEE PLASH S Y 64.01 .00 64.01 3411921430001 6234 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-4034 503729000302 TOM JOHNSON C Y 3411921430001 6234 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 503749000903 ROXANNE HAMILTON S Y 139.68 .00 139.68 3511921330033 2806 NASH RD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2036 503842000502 CHRISTOPHER P FAHEY S Y 520.33 .00 520.33 0311821110014 3018 61ST AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2605 503842000502 JULIA A FAHEY 2 Y 0311821110014 3018 61ST AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2605 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 35 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 503867000506 ABDI LIBAN S Y 82.07 .00 82.07 0211821220054 5942 VINCENT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2304 503867000506 KHADRA ABDULLE 2 Y 0211821220054 5942 VINCENT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2304 503876000405 RAYMOND BROWN S Y 151.44 .00 151.44 0211821230002 5836 VINCENT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2411 503879000101 THOMAS E AHERN S Y 215.26 .00 215.26 0211821220043 5901 VINCENT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2303 503912000002 JOSEPH JONES S Y 134.76 .00 134.76 0211821220018 5943 WASHBURN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2307 503929000107 ROBERTA JOHNSON S N 151.59 .00 151.59 0211821230009 5836 XERXES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2456 503929000107 NOVASTAR MORTGAGE F Y 0211821230009 1900 205 W 47TH PL WESTWOOD KS 66205 503934000404 DEB TALATALA S Y 234.16 .00 234.16 0311821110117 5913 XERXES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2311 503934000404 GENE TALATALA 2 Y 0311821110117 5913 XERXES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2311 503940000602 TERESA KNIGHT S Y 258.93 .00 258.93 0311821110111 5949 XERXES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2311 503972000702 SPENCER KRUCHTEN S N 334.03 .00 334.03 0311821110093 5949 YORK AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2640 503972000702 SPENCER KRUCHTEN B Y 0311821110093 2348 JAMES AVE N MPLS MN 55411-1959 503995000004 ABBY BOUDREAU S Y 85.32 .00 85.32 0311821140010 5841 ZENITH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2644 9 0 0 CURRENT CERCATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47)oage 36 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 503996000901 PAMELA ARNESON S Y 256.61 .00 256.61 0311821110083 5901 ZENITH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2646 504051000903 CLIFFORD WILLIAMS S Y 193.66 .00 193.66 0311821110071 5924 BEARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2630 504056000402 DON THAYER S Y 204.93 .00 204.93 0311821140016 3315 59TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2603 504113000503 RAMONA TAYLOR S Y 291.90 .00 291.90 0311821120084 6048 EWING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2516 504141000102 DAVID SPRUNK S Y 216.04 .00 216.04 0311821120070 3700 COMMODORE DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2508 504148000403 DEB IVERSON S Y 85.05 .00 85.05 0311821210027 3818 COMMODORE DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2406 504172000302 SHARON MILLER S Y 212 .61 .00 212.61 0311821240081 3806 58TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3005 504200000903 MARKLEY BRADLEY S Y 104.19 .00 104.19 0311821210029 6030 HALIFAX PL BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2440 504216000104 SARAH ROCKMORE S Y 175.84 .00 175.84 0311821210001 3801 COMMODORE DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2405 504265000105 CHRISTOPHER THOMAS S Y 114.35 .00 114.35 0311821130003 5843 EWING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2511 504265000105 NADALIE THOMAS 2 Y 0311821130003 5843 EWING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2511 504269000704 CARLOS LEON S Y 226.27 .00 226.27 0311821130037 5815 EWING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2511 504282000004 JASON LEE S Y 240.94 .00 240.94 0311821120048 5912 ADMIRAL LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2527 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 37 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 504325000901 J B CHAMBERLAIN S Y 129.60 .00 129.60 0311821210085 6031 HALIFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2435 504338000402 MARGARET M EIDE S Y 136.36 .00 136.36 0311821210119 4207 61ST AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2419 504347000301 OMER ROBECK S Y 156.19 .00 156.19 0311821210098 6000 JUNE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2464 504354000302 JULIE WARREN S Y 203.39 .00 203.39 0311821210081 5900 JUNE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2462 504404000301 RAY HARDY S N 126.25 .00 126.25 0311821240025 3819 58TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3004 504404000301 TAMMY FERDELMAN B Y 0311821240025 P 0 BOX 49156 BLAINE MN 55449-0156 504413000205 DIANE SCULLY S Y 121.09 .00 121.09 0311821130047 3617 ADMIRAL LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3010 504425000802 JOANN GILBAUGH S Y 221.11 .00 221.11 0311821130008 5717 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3057 504450000608 SHAWN M BROWN S Y 142.15 .00 142.15 0311821130071 5737 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3012 504456000002 MICHELLE KLEIN S Y 247.10 .00 247.10 0311821240001 5737 HALIFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3049 I 504497000104 VICKEY KORLEWALA S Y 83.96 .00 83.96 0311821310028 3912 BURQUEST LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3031 504524000803 MARTY LANDSEM S Y 239.36 .00 239.36 0311821310055 3807 56TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3020 504540000802 DEAN MORGAN S Y 107.87 .00 107.87 0311821310071 3800 ECKBERG DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3033 0 0 0 CURRENT CERCATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) 0age 38 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 504597000002 THOMAS ADKINS S Y 345.38 .00 345.38 0311821430084 3601 55TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3309 504597000002 ROBIN ADKINS 2 Y 0311821430084 3601 55TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3309 504633000604 GEORGE HAMILTON S Y 271.11 .00 271.11 0311821430018 3618 53RD PL N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3303 504642000504 STEVEN R FORCE S Y 320.27 .00 320.27 0311821430036 5336 SAILOR LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3320 504672000802 CHERYLE WILSON S Y 381.83 .00 381.83 0311821430050 5301 NORTHPORT DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3371 504684000407 SCOTT C HUGHES S Y 86.02 .00 86.02 0311821430042 5348 NORTHPORT DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3318 504700000405 RANDY COOK S Y 280.48 .00 280.48 0311821440012 5347 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3358 504721000901 ROBERT BATTA S Y 165.71 .00 165.71 0311821420017 5655 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3055 504723000703 GREG BARTON S Y 238.66 .00 238.66 0311821420009 5655 NORTHPORT DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3016 504757010501 BREMER BANK S Y 398.77 .00 398.77 0311821410013 5540 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3069 504818000302 JEFFREY L DELZER S Y 111.06 .00 111.06 0311821240012 4019 58TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3043 504841000402 CRAIG LOUISELLE S Y 236.35 .00 236.35 0311821240011 5736 JUNE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-2908 606044000203 JULIE A THOMPSON S Y 74.31 .00 74.31 1011821320060 4816 TWIN LAKE AVE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3812 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 39 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 606054030604 JERRY MCBEAN S N 59.75 .00 59.75 1011821320006 4220 LAKESIDE AVE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3805 606054030604 RICHARD ARNTSON 0 Y 1011821320006 4220 LAKESIDE AVE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3805 606056000702 JEFFREY MCILARTH S Y 101.38 .00 101.38 1011821320013 4703 LAKEVIEW AVE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3806 606056000702 CONNIE MCILARTH 2 Y 1011821320013 4703 LAKEVIEW AVE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3806 606077000201 LENARD MARTIN S Y 124.27 .00 124.27 1011821320027 4746 LAKEVIEW AVE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3807 606083000408 FLORENCE YANKEY S Y 48.71 .00 48.71 1011821320008 4104 LAKESIDE AVE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3803 606086000103 ELIZABETH COLLINS S Y 72.33 .00 72.33 1011821320002 4100 LAKESIDE AVE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3803 606172000601 JOSLYN CORP S N 755.95 .00 755.95 1011821230006 4825 AZELIA AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3843 606172000601 JOSLYN CORP B Y 1011821230006 9200 W FULLERTON FRANKLIN PARK IL 60131-3435 606378000803 FRANKLIN PROPERTIES S N 1139.45 .00 1139.45 1011821420027 3613 47TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55422-1466 606378000803 FRANKLIN PROPERTIES B Y 1011821420027 P 0 BOX 50556 MPLS MN 55405-0556 606378000803 JAMES B LEWIS C Y 1011821420027 2425 PARK AVE S MPLS MN 55404 606414000402 L SETHER S Y 184.66 .00 184.66 1011821120055 5100 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3334 CURRENT CERCATION REPORT 0 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) ge 40 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID 606414000402 LORRAINE POPPENHAGEN C Y 184.66 .00 184.66 1011821120055 5100 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3334 606427000901 JUDY FROEMMING S Y 90.09 .00 90.09 1011821120006 5234 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3336 606429000706 SCOTT FRENCH S Y 393.26 .00 393.26 1011821120012 5247 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3335 606430000403 WILLIAM WASHINGTON S Y 345.90 .00 345.90 1011821120013 5239 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3335 I 606430000403 ALEANE WASHINGTON 2 Y 1011821120013 5239 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 606447000503 TRENT JOHNSON S Y 78.89 .00 78.89 1011821130046 5037 DREW AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3945 606469000808 KENNETH WILSON S Y 251.76 .00 251.76 1011821120046 5152 EWING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3338 606469000808 KAREN WILSON 2 Y 1011821120046 5152 EWING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3338 606495000607 WILLIAM KRIER S Y 217.57 .00 217.57 1011821120073 5125 EWING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3337 606498000304 GEORGE ENGLES S Y 176.99 .00 176.99 1011821120076 5107 EWING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3337 606521000401 R J RIECK S Y 161.08 .00 161.08 1011821120083 5130 FRANCE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3342 606522000303 SCOTT ZAPZALKA S Y 115.96 .00 115.96 1011821120084 5136 FRANCE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3342 606522000303 LISA ZAPZALKA 2 Y 1011821120084 5136 FRANCE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 41 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 606546000502 COLLEEN GARCIA S Y 281.66 .00 281.66 1011821210019 5222 GREAT VIEW AVE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3346 606721000205 ALAN THOMSEN S Y 234.85 .00 234.85 1011821210070 3807 OAK ST BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3348 606722000103 KAREN RODRIGUEZ S Y 292.02 .00 292.02 1011821210068 5107 FRANCE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3341 606737000402 KATHRYN A LEE S Y 226.38 .00 226.38 1011821210054 3919 52ND AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3328 606737000402 GRANT W LEE 2 Y 1011821210054 3919 52ND AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 606876000502 DELORES RILEY S Y 199.50 .00 199.50 1011821140069 5017 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3402 606935000403 TERRY LARSON S Y 251.05 .00 251.05 1011821140020 3112 49TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3934 606937010102 THE HOWE CO S Y 4875.97 .00 4875.97 1011821410020 4821 XERXES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3709 606941000602 ROBERT WASHAM S Y 86.90 .00 86.90 1011821140016 4929 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3405 606950000403 LONG MOUA S Y 101.95 .00 101.95 1011821140024 4920 ZENITH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3926 606952000204 PHILIP SCAIA S Y 103.52 .00 103.52 1011821140022 4906 ZENITH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3926 606957000704 VINCENT ANTONELLI S Y 308.35 .00 308.35 1011821140032 4929 ZENITH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3925 606973000702 ROB VAN HOUSEN S Y 87.98 .00 87.98 1011821140045 4949 ABBOTT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3943 0 0 0 CURRENT CERCATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47)loage 42 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 606992000402 PAUL HENKEL S Y 157.69 .00 157.69 1011821110019 3012 51ST AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429-3454 606992000402 SANDRA HENKEL 2 Y 1011821110019 3012 51ST AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 607007005402 RONALD P STONEBERG S Y 49.45 .00 49.45 1011821110023 5201 XERXES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3326 607007005402 RONALD P STONEBERG C Y 1011821110023 7216 PERRY CT E BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 607112000703 JOHN REINARZ S N 325.69 .00 325.69 0211821340064 5306 RUSSELL AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2950 607112000703 STEPHANIE WILBUR B Y 0211821340064 8617 EDINBROOK XING #418 BROOKLYN PARK MN 55443-4007 607112010602 ULYSSE CLARK S N 216.07 .00 216.07 0211821340064 5308 RUSSELL AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2950 607112010602 STEPHANIE WILBUR B Y 0211821340064 8617 418 EDINBROOK XING BROOKLYN PARK MN 55443-4007 607125000205 EUGENE FOLLMER S Y 155.28 .00 155.28 0211821340039 5341 PENN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2941 607125000205 JUDY FOLLMER 2 Y 0211821340039 5341 PENN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2941 607134000102 SCOTT R TOMPKINS S Y 95.48 .00 95.48 0211821340020 5427 PENN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2943 607140000303 PATRICIA UDOVICH S Y 247.40 .00 247.40 0211821340024 5408 QUEEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2948 607149000403 ALICE KOLLIE S Y 460.49 .00 460.49 0211821340037 5339 QUEEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2945 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 43 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 607149000403 MICHAEL HAASE B Y 460.49 .00 460.49 0211821340037 1816 44TH AVE NE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MN 55421 607156000402 LINDA YOBBE S Y 235.22 .00 235.22 0211821340019 2407 55TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2939 607164000407 ELIZABETH YARWEH S Y 130.25 .00 130.25 0211821340011 2330 55TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2938 607183000103 KORPO CISCO S Y 109.81 .00 109.81 0211821430002 5300 PENN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2942 607183000103 GEORGE CISCO 2 Y 0211821430002 5300 PENN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-2942 607227000901 EDYTHE DANKERT S Y 93 .32 .00 93.32 0211821430024 5330 OLIVER AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3031 607231000304 LAWRENCE HECK S Y 239.83 .00 239.83 0211821430028 5306 OLIVER AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3031 607236000807 VERN RECK S Y 216.72 .00 216.72 0211821430019 5319 NEWTON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3028 607256000308 LAWRENCE PORTER S Y 126.10 .00 126.10 0211821430137 5321 MORGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3024 607256000308 GERMILLE PORTER 2 Y 0211821430137 5321 MORGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3024 607257000204 JACK BONIFACE S Y 188.43 .00 188.43 0211821430060 5331 MORGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3024 607267000002 STEVE DYE S Y 207.53 .00 207.53 0211821430077 2006 55TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3011 607267000002 CARLA DYE 2 Y 0211821430077 2006 55TH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3011 CURRENT CERCATION REPORT 0 11-FEB-2002 09:47 a e 44 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 607280000308 RONALD EDBERG S Y 235.86 .00 235.86 0211821430055 5332 MORGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3025 607287000607 ANDREW ARONS S Y 272.54 .00 272.54 0211821430040 5301 LOGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3020 607317000008 DEANA MILES S Y 70.96 .00 70.96 0211821440002 5338 LOGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3021 607317000008 DONALD MILES 2 Y 0211821440002 5338 LOGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3021 607326000907 ROBERT TABAKA S Y 86.86 .00 86.86 0211821440067 5311 KNOX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3057 I 607326000907 DEBORAH TABAKA 2 Y 0211821440067 5311 KNOX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3057 607329000606 JOEL KLINGENSMITH S Y 223.84 .00 223 .84 0211821440070 5325 KNOX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3057 607333000003 JEFFREY BRENNY S Y 227.89 .00 227.89 0211821440003 5349 KNOX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3057 607363000302 MICHAEL STEWART S Y 90.42 .00 90.42 0211821440057 5315 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3049 607368000802 SCOTT VINCENT S Y 133.43 .00 133.43 0211821440097 5345 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3049 607368000802 RHONDA VINCENT 2 Y 0211821440097 5345 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 607391000902 RAMON ROCHA S Y 523.44 .00 523.44 0211821440053 5324 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3050 607423000102 JOHN K CALHOUN S Y 131.10 .00 131.10 0211821440118 5344 IRVING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3048 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11-FEB-2002 (09:47) page 45 of 52 ACCOUNT-NUMBER NAME/ADDRESS ADDRESS-TYPE TAX-ROLL-SEND-CD AMT-OPEN ADMIN-CHARGE ASSESSED-AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 607437000502 JAMES VOIGHT S N 183.50 .00 183.50 0211821440037 5325 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3137 607437000502 TOM COMMERFORD B Y 0211821440037 3450 XERXES AVE N MPLS MN 55412-2231 607445000501 LORI MICKELSON S Y 155.23 .00 155.23 0211821440133 5419 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3171 607445000501 DAVE HOHN 2 Y 0211821440133 5419 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3171 607446000403 GAIL VAN HORN S Y 217.06 .00 217.06 0211821440132 5425 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3171 607455000205 CHARLES SKAUDIS S Y 118.16 .00 118.16 0211821410009 5547 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3173 607455000205 STEPHANIE SKAUDIS 2 Y 0211821410009 5547 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3173 607467000804 ROBERT MIKULAK S Y 193.89 .00 193.89 0211821410016 5624 IRVING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3075 607471000204 WILLIAM BAILEY S Y 150.32 .00 150.32 0211821410020 5600 IRVING AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3075 607517000806 BERNADETTE ANDERSON S Y 251.57 .00 251.57 0211821410059 5603 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3055 607521000206 THOMAS HOUSTON S Y 197.14 .00 197.14 0211821410055 5635 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3055 607521000206 LINDA SPAIN 2 Y 0211821410055 5635 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3055 607523000007 DIANNTHA DREPAUL S N 165.27 .00 165.27 0211821410053 5651 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430-3055 Ii CURRENT CERICATION REPORT 11 -FED -2002 (09:47)0age 46 of 52 ACCOUNT - NUMBER NAME /ADDRESS ADDRESS -TYPE TAX -ROLL- SEND -CD AMT -OPEN ADMIN - CHARGE ASSESSED -AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 607523000007 CLANCY JONES 2 Y 165.27 .00 165.27 0211821410053 5651 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 607523000007 JENNIFER DILLON -JONES C Y 0211821410053 5651 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 607523000008 JENNIFER DILLON -JONES S Y 104.53 .00 104.53 0211821410053 5651 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3055 607523000008 CLANCY JONES 2 Y 0211821410053 5651 JAMES AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3055 607535000604 ALAN CANEFF S Y 319.87 .00 319.87 0211821410113 5540 KNOX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3062 607543000603 LASHEL KLUG - OLIVER S Y 97.68 .00 97.68 0211821410089 5517 KNOX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3061 607548000108 MARK BROWN S Y 95.08 .00 95.08 0211821410084 5557 KNOX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3061 607551000504 SHARON RANDS S Y 181.32 .00 181.32 0211821410073 5619 KNOX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3063 607556000003 CHAD LUBY S Y 185.04 .00 185.04 0211821410068 5659 KNOX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3063 607578000401 PETER MILINKOVICH S Y 70.64 .00 70.64 0211821420009 5541 LOGAN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3065 607640000804 RALLIE H RONDORF S Y 81.62 .00 81.62 0211821420061 5506 OLIVER AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -2932 607675000602 KEVIN SMITH S Y 295.71 .00 295.71 0211821310036 2306 ERICON DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -2918 607682000702 CAROL L BERG S Y 86.86 .00 86.86 0211821420102 2112 ERICON DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -2914 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11 -FEB -2002 (09:47) page 47 of 52 ACCOUNT - NUMBER NAME /ADDRESS ADDRESS -TYPE TAX -ROLL- SEND -CD AMT -OPEN ADMIN- CHARGE ASSESSED -AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 607687000202 MARK OSTEEN S Y 209.45 .00 209.45 0211821420097 2012 ERICON DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -2912 607693000403 VA YANG S Y 131.05 .00 131.05 0211821420052 2101 BROOKVIEW DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -2905 607701000401 KATHRYN ENDICOTT S Y 178.22 .00 178.22 0211821420088 5518 JUDY LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -2924 607705000002 STEVE A MARTINETTI S Y 92.62 .00 92.62 0211821420082 5525 JUDY LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -2923 607717000605 TODD JUDE S Y 99.79 .00 99.79 0211821420073 2301 BROOKVIEW DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -2909 607718000504 MATTHEW HAWTON S Y 218.34 .00 218.34 0211821310008 2307 BROOKVIEW DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -2909 607718000504 AMY HAWTON 2 Y 0211821310008 2307 BROOKVIEW DR BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 I 607740000703 STEVEN WEGENER S Y 111.72 .00 111.72 0211821310011 5606 LILAC DR N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -2928 607748000901 ALBERT WILLIAMS S Y 192.48 .00 192.48 0111821320047 5650 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3176 607760010107 ROGER LOGAN S Y 86.27 .00 86.27 0111821320064 5548 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3174 607760010107 NAOMI LOGAN 2 Y 0111821320064 5548 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3174 607772020605 SEAN WATKINS S Y 270.22 .00 270.22 0111821320075 5547 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3167 I 607772020605 LUMARIE WATKINS 2 Y 0111821320075 5547 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3167 CURRENT CERO CATION REPORT 11 -FEB -2002 (09:47) age 48 of 52 ACCOUNT - NUMBER NAME /ADDRESS ADDRESS -TYPE TAX- ROLL - SEND -CD AMT -OPEN ADMIN- CHARGE ASSESSED -AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 607775000502 DAVID MEAWAY S Y 178.22 .00 178.22 0111821320050 5609 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3169 607786000202 DARYL GRAVES S Y 106.26 .00 106.26 0111821320043 5646 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3170 607791000506 KENNETH MALONEY S Y 268.15 .00 268.15 0111821320037 5548 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3168 607793000302 GREGORY MICKA S Y 178.22 .00 178.22 0111821320035 5538 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3168 607795000103 ANDERSON S Y 207.05 .00 207.05 0111821320033 5524 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3168 607909000404 TAHIROU DIOURY S Y 202.95 .00 202.95 0111821320022 5625 FREMONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3163 607909000404 FATOU SOWE 2 Y 0111821320022 5625 FREMONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3163 607913000803 JOEL ALMBERG S Y 192.08 .00 192.08 0111821320020 5651 FREMONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3163 607927000203 PHOUVIENG VILAVONG S Y 138.82 .00 138.82 0111821320102 5516 FREMONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3162 607934000303 SETH CARTER S Y 229.88 .00 229.88 0111821320097 5511 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3155 607957000503 R L KRONBERG S Y 302.92 .00 302.92 0111821320013 5628 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3158 607980000604 JESSE SALAZAR S Y 273.28 .00 273.28 0111821320004 5625 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3153 607980000604 PENNY SALAZAR 2 Y 0111821320004 5625 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3153 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11 -FEB -2002 (09:47) page 49 of 52 ACCOUNT - NUMBER NAME /ADDRESS ADDRESS -TYPE TAX -ROLL- SEND -CD AMT -OPEN ADMIN- CHARGE ASSESSED -AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 607995000902 LOLA I NELSEN S Y 304.19 .00 304.19 0111821310081 5540 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3152 607999000504 C NATHANIEL GEORGE S Y 83.82 .00 83.82 0111821310077 5508 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3152 608010000806 DAVE RUMPLE S Y 218.12 .00 218.12 0111821310028 5607 COLFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3149 608039000505 MARK KAMMERER S Y 173.60 .00 173.60 0111821310052 5541 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3143 608040000203 GREG BADER S Y 115.10 .00 115.10 0111821310035 5603 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3145 608043000903 YOLANDA COX S N 178.22 .00 178.22 0111821310037 5631 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3145 608043000903 YOLANDA COX B Y 0111821310037 P 0 BOX 2101 MPLS MN 55402 -0101 608067000007 JEFFREY MORRISON S Y 238.35 .00 238.35 0111821310105 5513 CAMDEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3246 608085000801 JAMES A JARVIMAKI S Y 214.74 .00 214.74 0111821310087 5625 ALDRICH AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3105 608098000304 THOMAS W STORIE S Y 196.74 .00 196.74 0111821310110 5607 CAMDEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3203 608100000902 THOMAS CHAPMAN S Y 155.23 .00 155.23 0111821310108 5621 CAMDEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3203 608234000801 DAVE HEALY S Y 182.92 .00 182.92 0111821430060 5401 4TH ST N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3202 608240000003 WEHMAN STEPHANIE S Y 139.68 .00 139.68 0111821430065 5323 4TH ST N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3226 CURRENT CERCATION REPORT 0 11 -FEB -2002 (09:47)lage 50 of 52 ACCOUNT - NUMBER NAME /ADDRESS ADDRESS -TYPE TAX- ROLL - SEND -CD AMT -OPEN ADMIN- CHARGE ASSESSED -AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 608266000903 ANTHONY KUYKENDALL S Y 93.37 .00 93.37 0111821430047 5444 CAMDEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3245 608266000903 MARGIE KUYKENDALL 2 Y 0111821430047 5444 CAMDEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3245 608267000802 WILLIAM HUSTING S Y 124.59 .00 124.59 0111821430048 5448 CAMDEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3245 608267000802 JENNIFER KLIMA 2 Y 0111821430048 5448 CAMDEN AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3245 608286010401 PHILLIP BERGLIN S Y 80.15 .00 80.15 0111821430106 601 BELLVUE LA BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3594 608308000902 RENEE DRESSEL S Y 125.71 .00 125.71 0111821340042 5418 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3115 608317000802 CLINT HESTER S Y 94.45 .00 94.45 0111821340126 5441 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3114 608317000802 CAROLYN HESTER 2 Y 0111821340126 5441 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3114 608322000103 PAMELA SCHMAEDKA S Y 273.31 .00 273.31 0111821340057 5405 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3114 608322000103 PAMELA SCHMAEDKA B Y 0111821340057 6610 3 42ND AVE N CRYSTAL MN 55427 -1467 608322000103 MICHAEL A SCHMAEDEKA C Y 0111821340057 7575 117 W BATTAGLIA DR CASA GRANDE AZ 85222 -7740 608329000404 GLEN PETERSEN S Y 121.44 .00 121.44 0111821340072 5309 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3112 608331000002 SHERITTA SCROGGINS S Y 179.37 .00 179.37 0111821340078 5305 BRYANT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3112 CURRENT CERTIFICATION REPORT 11 -FEB -2002 (09:47) page 51 of 52 ACCOUNT - NUMBER NAME /ADDRESS ADDRESS -TYPE TAX -ROLL- SEND -CD AMT -OPEN ADMIN- CHARGE ASSESSED -AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 608333000803 JAMES SCHELLER S Y 187.66 .00 187.66 0111821340082 904 53RD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3569 608344000504 CINDY GRANQUIST S Y 185.04 .00 185.04 0111821340061 5406 COLFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3124 608351000502 MARK COLE S Y 283.12 .00 283.12 0111821340050 5448 COLFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3124 608351000502 CANDI COLE 2 Y 0111821340050 5448 COLFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3124 608358000805 M & D MOEN JR S Y 208.10 .00 208.10 0111821340110 5439 COLFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3123 608362000203 JAMES PLOHOCKY S Y 215.80 .00 215.80 0111821340104 5357 COLFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3121 608386000403 PETER BERGLUND S Y 129.39 .00 129.39 0111821340106 5408 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3128 608388000203 PAUL F BABEL S Y 266.62 .00 266.62 0111821340109 5438 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3128 608411000306 JASON QUILLING S N 150.49 .00 150.49 0111821330146 5301 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3177 608411000306 JASON QUILLING F Y 0111821330146 3801 5TH ST NE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MN 55421 -3703 608411000306 MELANIE M DEBELLIS 2 Y 0111821330146 5301 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55421 -3703 608411000306 JAMES A DEBELLIS C Y 0111821330146 5301 DUPONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55421 -3703 608412000201 ROGER KLINGENSMITH S Y 193.17 .00 193.17 0111821330147 5302 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3130 CURRENT CERCATION REPORT 11 -FEB -2002 (09:47)0age 52 of 52 ACCOUNT - NUMBER NAME /ADDRESS ADDRESS -TYPE TAX -ROLL- SEND -CD AMT -OPEN ADMIN - CHARGE ASSESSED -AMT PID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 608419000502 ALPHA JENNINGS S Y 253.22 .00 253.22 0111821330154 5346 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3130 608435000502 TAHASHA L HARPOLE S Y 301.95 .00 301.95 0111821330096 5427 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3131 608444000408 AMY BORGSTROM S Y 166.67 .00 166.67 0111821330114 5339 EMERSON AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3129 608465000802 ARNTSON S Y 104.19 .00 104.19 0111821330103 5408 FREMONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3160 608468010406 JEREMY BENVER S Y 207.44 .00 207.44 0111821330106 5418 FREMONT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3160 608499000803 JUSTIN BRANDVOLD S Y 88.46 .00 88.46 0111821330044 5404 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3166 608513000002 JAMES EVANOV S Y 86.02 .00 86.02 0111821330059 5415 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3165 608520000105 ALISON WALK S Y 269.96 .00 269.96 0111821330022 5333 GIRARD AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3135 608528000304 MARK KLINGLE S Y 244.31 .00 244.31 0111821330030 5314 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3138 608528000304 TAMI KLINGLE 2 Y 0111821330030 5314 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3138 608536000301 CHARLES DIBBLE S Y 190.44 .00 190.44 0111821330066 5422 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430 -3172 532C 114808.46* .00* 114808.46* I City Council Agenda Item No. 8a • • MEMORANDUM DATE: February 6, 2002 TO: Michael McCauley, City Mana er FROM: Todd Howard, City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Ordering Improvements and Authorizing Development of Plans and Specifications for Improvement Project Nos. 2002 -05, 06, and 07, Garden City South Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements Summary Explanation The proposed project includes roadway, storm drainage, and utility improvements for the Garden City South Neighborhood. The attached feasibility report includes maps showing the specific improvement locations. The project was previously established by the City Council on May 23, 2001, and two informational meetings have been conducted with residents and property owners since then. Oil January 28, 2002, the City COU11CII received the feasibility report and scheduled a public hearing for February 11 2002 to consider these improvements. The proposed improvements can generally be described as follows: replacement of the existing streets • with new bituminous surfacing and concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer installation, repair and replacement of existing sanitary sewer and water main facilities, and street light replacement. The attached Feasibility Report describes the project improvement costs and schedule in more detail. Assessments In accordance with City Council's policy regarding improvement projects in residential areas, proposed assessments have been made on a unit basis. The Council's 2002 residential rate for street construction is $2,400 per parcel and $790 per parcel for storm drainage improvements. Properties on Xerxes Avenue are proposed to assessed the mill and overlay rate of $1,755 per residential unit. Property zoned other than single family residential is assessed at a rate of $0.29/sf for street improvements and $0.14 /sf for storm drainage improvements. The public hearing will not consider the proposed assessments. If the Council approves the Improvement Projects, a separate assessment hearing would be scheduled for September 2002. All property owners in the area affected by the proposed improvements have been duly notified as required by law. Recommended Action It is recommended that Council receive a staff presentation. Following the presentation, the public hearing should be opened, public comments taken, and then close the public hearing. A resolution • ordering the improvements and authorizing development of the plans and specifications is provided for Council consideration. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its • adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING DEVELOPMENT OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2002 -05, 06, AND 07, GARDEN CITY SOUTH STREET, STORM DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center City Council on May 23, 2001 authorized consideration of street, storm drainage, and utility improvements in the area generally described as "Garden City South," consisting of the following streets: all streets bounded by Brooklyn Boulevard on the west Shingle Creek on the east 61 Avenue on the north and Northway Drive to the south and Xerxes Avenue between 1 -94 and Northway Drive; and WHEREAS, the Council has previously received and accepted a feasibility report for said proposed improvements, as prepared by the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, said improvements are necessary, cost effective and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report; and WHEREAS, the City Council on January 28, 2002 adopted a resolution setting a date for a public hearing regarding the proposed improvements for Garden City South Neighborhood; and • WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the hearing was given and the hearing was held on February 11, 2002, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered all conunents, testimony, evidence and reports offered at or prior to the February 11, 2002 hearing; and WHEREAS, the City reasonably expects to spend monies from the Special Assessment Construction Fund, Local State Aid Fund, Water Utility Fund, Sanitary Sewer Fund, or Storm Drainage Utility Fund on a temporary basis to pay the expenditures described in this resolution; and WHEREAS, the City reasonably expects to reimburse itself for such expenditures from the proceeds of taxable or tax - exempt bonds, the debt service of which is expected to be paid from property taxes, special assessments, or utility fees. The maximum amount of obligations expected to be issued for such project is $1,000,000; and WHEREAS, City Staff, under the direction of the City Engineer are prepared to prepare plans and specifications for said project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. Improvement Project Nos. 2002 -05, 06 and 07, Garden City South Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements, are hereby ordered. RESOLUTION NO. 2. The City Engineer is authorized to prepare plans and specifications for said improvement. 3. This resolution is intended to constitute official intent to issue taxable or tax exempt reimbursement bonds for purposes of Treasury Regulation 1.105 -2 and any successor law, regulation, or ruling. This resolution shall be modified to the extent required or permitted by Treasury Regulation 1.105 -2 or any successor law, regulation, or ruling. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. r -3[ City of Brooklyn Center A great place to start. A great place to stay. • 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PKWY BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 ENGINEERING: 569 -3340 FAX: 569 -3494 ENGINEER'S FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR • GARDEN CITY SOUTH NE I G HB ORHO OD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2002 -05, 06 &07 JANUARY, 2002 I hereby certify that this feasibility report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesot�� Reg. No. 23095 Todd Howard. P. E. City Engineer January 23, 2002 Feasibility Report Garden City South Neighborhood Page 1 OVERVIEW (see Figure 1) • These proposed projects include roadway and utility improvements for the Garden City South Neighborhood, more specifically all public streets as shown in Figure 1. The general improvement area consists of the following streets: all streets bounded by Brooklyn Boulevard on the west, Shingle Creek on the east, 61" Avenue on the north, and Northway Drive to the south. Xerxes Avenue between I- 94 and Northway Drive is also proposed for pavement rehabilitation (see map). Estimated costs for the new street improvements are included in a Cost and Funding Chart on the attached Figure 5. This report was prepared in accordance with previous direction of the City Council that staff would conduct Public Information meetings. On November 15, 2001 and January 15, 2002, public information meetings were conducted. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS STREETS Improvement Project 2002 -05 (see Figure 1) The majority of the streets in the proposed project area are classified as local residential streets, originally constructed in conjunction with utility installations in the late 1950's and early 1960's. All of the existing streets are very flat, and in most areas do not have concrete curb and gutter. On average, the streets are 30 feet wide, with a pavement thickness of about 2.0 inches. These streets are aging and showing fatigue and distress, particularly along their unprotected edges. The City's • Pavement Management Program indicates that it is no longer cost - effective to routinely maintain these streets (i.e., patch and sealcoat). Complete reconstruction is warranted. It is proposed to reconstruct these streets as two lane roadways measuring 30 feet in width with a structural capacity for the current volume and vehicle distribution. On- street parking on both sides would continue to be allowed on all streets as existing and in accordance with the City's parking ordinances. Concrete curbs and gutters and driveway aprons would be installed as part of the improvement. Traffic volumes on most of these streets are typical of local residential streets. Traffic counts on 59' Avenue indicate approximately 1,000 vehicle trips per day, which is consistent with traffic volumes on residential streets. Some residents in the area have expressed traffic speed concerns. Most of the concerns were generated from 59"' Avenue, citing cut through traffic and speeding as primary issues. Residents on Beard Avenue also expressed concern of speeding traffic. Traffic calming measures were reviewed with residents but due to a lack of consensus are not proposed as part of the improvements. Xerxes Avenue is a Municipal State Aid street with traffic volumes of approximately 9,000 vehicles per day. The segment of street was constructed to its current alignment in the 1950's. In 1985, the pavement was milled and overlayed and repairs were made to the concrete curb and gutter. The existing pavement is 4 -5 inches thick and the aging pavement is showing signs of distress. A total • depth mill and overlay is proposed and is the most cost effective rehabilitation strategy. Feasibility Report Garden City South Neighborhood Page 2 There are no new sidewalks proposed as part of the project. Portions of the existing sidewalk on Xerxes Avenue would be replaced and new concrete pedestrian ramps are proposed. Additional enhancements to the median on Xerxes Avenue include colored concrete, street lighting and trees. No • new sidewalks or trails are included in the cost estimates. The cost estimates in this report do include a lump sum allocation ($30,000) for planting boulevard trees to replace those removed. An amount of $80,000 has also been allocated for replacement of street lights. Staff is working with Xcel Energy at this time to determine final pole locations and determine if more street lighting is needed. STORM DRAINAGE Improvement Project 2002 -06 (see Figure 2 for proposed storm sewer system) The existing storm sewer system in the project area was installed on a per development basis and is undersized throughout the proposed project area. Piping and storm water intakes are proposed in this area to alleviate localized drainage problems. The surface water runoff from the project generally flows from west to east into Shingle Creek. The southern portion of runoff from the Garden City South neighborhood is piped along the north side of 59 "' Avenue to Upton Avenue south toward the Summerchase Apartment complex where it outlets into Shingle Creek. Portions of the trunk storm sewer along 59 "' Avenue are undersized and additional catch basins are needed to prevent localized flooding. Survey results received from residents also indicate some localized incidents of standing water. The northern portion of the project area is piped down 60 "' Avenue and 61 Avenue and outlets into a drainage ditch north of the Little League fields. Additional intakes are proposed and the existing interceptors on 60` Avenue and 61" Avenue will be utilized to the extent practical. A pond is proposed to treat the surface water runoff from this drainage area and maintenance is required on the existing ditch. A smaller drainage area east of Xerxes Avenue is proposed to be routed to Shingle Creek along the 60" Avenue alignment. Figure 2 shows a preliminary concept for storm drainage improvements to serve the project area. The project design essentially provides for installation of additional storm sewers and catch basins to provide additional pick -up points throughout the neighborhood, thereby allowing streets to be regraded to provide more positive drainage, and to minimize localized flooding. To the extent practical, the existing storm sewers stem will be utilized. Additional piping, intakes throughout P g Y the g proposed project area, and treatment ponds are estimated to cost $669,000. SANITARY SEWERS Improvement Project 2002 -07 (see Figure 3) • All sanitary sewers in the project area generally are 8 -inch diameter or 10 -inch diameter clay pipe, installed in the late 1950's and early 1960's. Because these sewers were constructed without gaskets in Feasibility Report Garden City South Neighborhood Page 3 the joints, they are subject to a modest level of ground water infiltration. Often, it would not be cost - effective to eliminate this infiltration if the pipe itself were in good condition. City maintenance records along with a televised inspection of all sewers in this area document a significant tree root • infiltration problem and some structural defects in the sewer mains. Surveys received from residents also indicate various experiences with plugging of service lines that can often be attributed to root penetration of the pipe joints. City maintenance staff is required to routinely perform root sawing on the sanitary mains in the project area to prevent back -ups. The televised inspections have indicated that root infiltration is significant throughout the majority of the sanitary sewer system in Garden City South (Figure 3). In particular, root infiltration and blockages are seen at the connection points between private service lines and the mains. Therefore, nearly all sewer mains in the project area are proposed to be replaced. Sewer mains along Beard Avenue and along 61st Avenue are in excellent condition and replacement does not appear warranted. Staff has compared costs of complete replacements vs. repair and replacement of specific problem areas only. Because of construction methods, mobilization costs, and in consideration of the final product and long term performance, it has been determined that in the long -term perspective, complete replacement appears more feasible at this time. An attempt will be made during the development of detailed plans to avoid replacing services in circumstances where complete replacement is not warranted. A force main on Vincent Avenue was constructed in the 1950's out of cast iron pipe. The segment of forcemain to the north of the project area and to the south of the project area has been replaced. Replacement of this forcemain is proposed. Additional information regarding sewer problems was received from property owners during the public participation process. Based on that information and additional review of other available information, final recommendations will be made during the final design process and project cost estimates will be revised accordingly. At this time the estimated cost of sanitary sewer work as proposed is $632,000. WATER MAINS Improvement Project 2002 -07 (see Figure 4) The water distribution system in this particular neighborhood was installed in the early 1960's with cast iron pipe. Based on the year installed and the information received from the resident surveys, 'the cast iron pipe has corrosion resistant lining. Water pressures throughout the system are adequate. However, in some instances, water may become stagnant in certain areas, such as the dead end streets and the Upton Avenue cul -de -sac, as a result of poor circulation, and thus contribute to the water quality related problems. The cast iron pipe is brittle. In areas where deep trenching will disturb the soil, thereby increasing the risk of breaking, the mains will be replaced. In addition, leaky valves, and aging hydrants would be replaced as part of this work. The cost of this water system work is estimated to be $315,000. ® ESTIMATED COSTS AND FUNDING CONSIDERATIONS (see Figure 5) The total estimated cost for the proposed project is $3,928,000. A detailed breakdown of this Feasibility Report Garden City South Neighborhood Page 4 gstimate, as well as funding sources is explained as follows in this report and attachment. Costs and Funding for Street Improvements, Proiect No. 2002 -05 • The estimated project cost for roadway improvements for all streets in this project area is $2,312,000. These costs include project administration, engineering, street lighting and reforestation. It is proposed to levy special assessments for street improvements in accordance with the 2002 rates adopted by the City Council. The rates adopted by the City Council provide for a standard 2002 residential street assessment rate of $2,400 per residential property. The mill and overlay assessment rate is proposed to be $1,755 per residential property. These rates would be assessed to all benefited residential properties as shown in Figure 1. The assessment rate for non - residential properties is proposed to be $0.29 per square foot. On this basis it is estimated that special assessments totaling $639,044 would be levied for street improvements. Costs and Funding for Storm Drainage System Improvements, Proiect No. 2002 -06 The total estimated cost for storm drainage improvements within the Garden City South Neighborhood area is $669,000. This includes the cost of storm sewer construction throughout the project area. It is proposed to levy special assessments for storm drainage improvements in accordance with the 2002 rates adopted by the City Council. Application of this rate to properties benefited by these improvements will result in estimated special assessments of $790 per single - family residential unit. The rate for non - residential properties is proposed to be $0.14 per square foot. The total cost to be • assessed would be $190,602.22. The Storm Drainage Utility Fund would pay for a substantial amount of the remainder of the storm sewer costs. Costs and Funding for Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Improvements. Proiect No. 2002 -07 The estimated cost of sanitary sewer repairs and /or replacements is $632,000 and the estimated costs for water main repair and /or replacements is $315,000. As previously noted, these cost estimates are preliminary at this time. However, all such costs would be funded by their respective utility funds, in accordance with established policy for such improvements. Recommended 2002 Proiect Schedule January 28 City Council receives feasibility report and calls for public hearing February 11 Public Hearing, City Council may authorize the project and order preparation of plans and specifications February 28 Approve plans and specifications, authorize Ad for Bids March 25 Bid opening April 8 City Council awards contract May 1 Start construction Feasibility Report Garden City South Neighborhood Page 5 September Construction Substantially Complete • September Special Assessment Hearing Conclusion The overall condition of the City's infrastructure system (streets, sewers, utilities) is critical to the operation, safety, welfare, and economic health of the entire City. As a result of the infrastructure needs described, and the proposed solutions and estimated costs described in this report, the proposed project is considered to be necessary, cost effective, and feasible. � � ( g � Todd Howard, P. E. City Engineer Reg. No. 23095 • Feasibility Report Garden City South Neighborhood Page 6 • • • Garden City South Reconstruction Area 94'694 1 Overview - Project Area 66TH AVE. N. / t E 65TH AVE. N. / ! k 64TH AVE. N. O'HENRY RD. D> / a 63RD. AVE. N. F ' X NASH RD. / MUMFORD RD. BROOKLYN DR. . / X �f 62ND AVE. N. cyl N / 61ST AVE. N. j {. ... Z ..�i... 60TH AVE. N. w f >.. 5 9TH AVE. W Not to Scale Fig.1 �. � N /v OR Ty ART "wAY Q� , Garden City Sout Reconstruction Area STORM MAINLINE REPLACEMENT EXISTING STORM SEWER TO REMAIN ----- --- -- STORM MANHOLE Storm Sewer CATCH BASIN 8 1 Overview - Project Area 61ST AV I N RIK-in 60TH AVE N. n Li LLJ > -LLJ- - Lli - > U1 <> < u-0 > a Z <- < <- C/') Li z X LLJ- LLJ o U LLJ M M- 0 LJ Z LLJ- < V Z W , -- L f � 9TH r"1: AVE. N. 1 0 7 , Not to Scale Fig. 2 Garden City O outh Reconstruction Area SANITARY MAINLINE AND Sanitary Sewer SERVICE REPLACEMENT Overview - Project Area SANITARY SERVICE REPLACEMENT o — o — o -- o — o — o 61 S T AVE. N. SANITARY SERVICE REPLACEMENT SANITARY FORCEMAIN REPLACEMENT LIFT STATION o ' I I 61 ST I AVE. I IN. I I I I o I ° 0- — o-- o— o— .o— o —o —o —o —o —o —I I I o j — ® 0 0 o 0 I 60TH AVE. N. n O � O o —z_ z- z o I L;. �, Q o —> W ] Q Q Q- N I �- >- Q z ° I ►— Q Cf) z z Q o ~- _- Y- W- m W- LLJ X m I m - —z- O �, U) z —j— o m W- - X- Q � I��✓1 m I. .. II III +I I,IIIII x_411 II II �i ill tll III III Ills I.II 11110 _O _ tll ° 59TH AVE. r I l l I �� Not to Scale F Garden City Slluth Reconstruction Area WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT EXISTING WATERMAIN TO REMAIN — w W— Watermain Overview - Project Area ( ` 61 ST I AVE. , N W�W W�W W ( W W— 60TH I AVE. I N. - ---•�- I _ I z_ I _z_ I z- I z- z - I �N al I I >I z Q Q w I ~ O - m m -3: r.. 59TH AVE. l l � I 3 Not to Scale FI COSTS & FUNDING - IMP. PROJECT 2002-05,06& 07 GARDEN CITY NORTH - FEASIBILITY SUMMARY ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE STREET SANITARY WATERMAIN STORM ESTIMATED SEWER SEWER TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 1,848,000.00 $ 527,000.00 $ 265,000.00 $ 608,000.00 $ 3,248,000.00 CONTINGENCY (10 %) $ 184,800.00 $ 52,700.00 $ 26,500.00 $ 60,800.00 324,800.00 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $ 2,032,800.00 $ 579,700.00 $ 291,500.00 $ 668,800.00 $ 3,572,800.00 ADMIN, ENG., LEGAL $ 170,000.00 $ 52,000.00 $ 23,000.00 $ 53.00 $ 245,053.00 REFORESTATION $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 STREET LIGHTS $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (FEASIBILITY) $ 2,312,800.00 $ 631,700.00 $ 314,500.00 $ 668,853.00 $ 3,927,853.00 ESTIMATED REVENUE STREET ASSESS = $2400 /UNIT X 2000NITS $ 480,000.00 $ 480,000.00 CITY OPEN SPACE $ 14,572.50 $ 14,572.50 STORM ASSESS = $7901 UNIT X 200 UNITS $ 158,000.00 RESIDENTIAL (Mill & Overlay) $1755 X 23 UNITS $ 40,365.00 $ - $ 40,365.00 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT (Mill & Overlay) $ 32,275.88 $ - $ 32,275.88 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT $ 67,533.17 $ 32,602.22 $ 100,135.39 LITTLE LEAGUE ASSESSMENT $ 4,297.61 $ 4,297.61 SANITARY SEWER FUND $ 631,700.00 $ 631,700.00 WATER FUND $ 314,500.00 $ 314,500.00 RES. STORM DRAINAGE ASSESS =$750/ UNIT X 288 UNITS $ 216,000.00 $ 216,000.00 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND $ 262,250.78 $ 262,250.78 STREET LIGHT UTILITY $ 50,000.00 MSA $ 390,000.00 $ 390,000.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CONST FUND $ 1,233,755.84 $ 1,233,755.84 TOTAL EST. REVENUE (FEASIBILITY) $ 2,312,800.00 $ 631,700.00 $ 314,500.00 $ 668,853.00 $ 3,927,853.00 FIGURE 5 GARDEN CITY SOUTH SURVEY SUMMARY RESULTS Address Trees Sanitary Storm Water Comments/ Concerns 61 ST AVE 3006 No trees by service. No No No Have underground sprinklers. In- ground pool drainage pipe to the street. If these are damaged will they be replaced? 3009 Trees are on private Have a slow toilet. Corner of York & 61" No Just do minimum required work. property. usually floods. Stone Assessment is going to be a financial drain is a problem. burden. We do not want expensive neighborhood beautification. 3100 No No When it rains hard No York & 61" — storm sewer can't take street floods bad. all the water. I've lost 2 cars to Front yard is under flooding in my driveway. Any water. 3100 and 3106 questions please call. are low spots. Get water in house all the time. I think street needs to be raised. 3106 No Yes Streets, yard and No Want to save three sections of my basement floods when driveway that will be removed. it rains hard. Sewers wont drain between Zenith and York. 1 Address Trees Sanitary Storm Water Comments /.Concerns 61 ST AVE 3107 One blvd. tree we Twice have had line Street floods with Haven't Would like landscaping workshop. would like removed. cleaned in 11 yrs. heavy rains. Catch noticed. We Want to put in a new driveway during Maybe other trees as basin at 61 & York drink bottled construction. well. slow, ponding up to 3 water. feet. 3112 No No Streets flood with No Neighbors park on street over night heavy rain. Yard also and for long periods of time. This floods. should be first step in neighborhood beautification. Garbage containers left in front yard. 3200 1 tree on top of Lined cleaned in 1988. In heavy rain water No Are we going to have a sidewalk? I'd sanitary sewer. will accumulate on like 61 raised a foot. drain. ABBOTT A VE 5835 No blvd. trees. Line cleaned twice in After heavy rain, No. A couple How can we beautify our dead -end? 4 years. streets drain slow. of times our Hope project doesn't increase water was pavement we want as much green as dark and possible. cloudy. 5842 No blvd. trees No No No Lots of police calls to apartments on Northway Dr., we are concerned about the crime. What is happening with the old Jerry's property? So many businesses are leaving B.C. 5900 -- Line cleaned approx. Flooding on the 2 Water is very Traffic cut through is bad. Police cars every 3 yrs. dead -ends. hard. are big offenders of speeding on 59"'. 5912 -- Had service cleaned No No None last May — cause roots. 2 • Address Trees Sanitar Storm Water Comments/ Concerns ABBOTT A VE 5918 Yes Have line cleaned No No People should take more pride in their yearly due to tree yards. roots. 5924 Elm tree Clean line approx. No No No once a year. 5943 Yes Line cleaned every 2 Yes, in street. Approx. once No years. a year we get very rusty water. 5949 Elm tree Line cleaned every 2 During heavy rain our No No years. yard floods about 8 ". 6019 Blvd. tree removed Line cleaned every Corner of 60' & Water smells Landscape workshops and ideas for year. We have been Abbott Ave. and 59 swampy home remodeling. told we have "slipped & Abbott floods. occasionally. tile" or mis- aligned pipe. 3 Address Trees Sanitary Storm Water Comments/ Concerns BEARD AVE 6000 -- No No No Straighten out 60 "'. 60 "' & B. Blvd is a sharp corner, move the pole around the corner more. What trees are going? (see attachment) 6018 Trees Cleaned line once in 8 No Stale, musty Need to design street to maintain 20- years. Need quality tasting water 25 mph traffic. Need more pedestrian water tight installation that discolors and bike friendly roadways. Need of sewer pipes. Tupperware traffic calming features built into plastic. Rusty roadway and narrow roadway 26' at and metal intersections. Walkways needed on particles in Beard, 61", 60` and 59` - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - water. BROOKLYN BLVD 5930 -- No Yes, parking lot. No No UPTON AVE 5837 1 blvd. tree. No No No There are 2 handicapped people living here that cannot walk & need access to and from house everyday. 5842 Tree root problems. Have line cleaned Occasional water in Very hard and Hard to turn on and off to 50' from every 8 -10 years. basement from poor quality. Xerxes. It is a 90 degree turn with no plugged gutter from give. Plows also have trouble at this heavy rains. corner. Many many code problems with parking on street, no enforcement from BCPP unless they are pushed. Not much patrol by BCPP in our area. They are busy in other areas such as apartments. Neighborhood looks fair to junky! 4 Address Trees Sanitary Storm Water Comments/ Concerns UPTONA VE 5843 Tree close to line. Yes but not for several No No Will I lose trees? Will our fence be years. affected? We have concerns about getting in and out both by car and by walking. 5 913 1 tree Every 1 -1 /2 — 2 years No No No line plugged. I 5918 Yes No Backyard floods from No Beautiful trees along street adds creek. Some water beauty to neighborhood. Removing sitting in street near them will set area back 75 years. driveway VINCENT A VE 5837 -- Line cleaned 1 -1/2 Basement flooding I think the Summer Chase Apts. is a thorn in our years ago. during heavy rain. water turn off sides for the neighborhood. Interested in my front in landscaping and remodeling. yard is damaged. 5843 Tree near sewer. Tree roots in line. No No No 5913 One boulevard tree. No Basement flooding. No Interested in landscaping and remodeling workshops. 5937 One tree not on blvd. No Low spot on street at No No curb. 5948 -- No No No 60` & Xerxes — evergreens block view. Need more flowering trees along Xerxes, Bass Lake Rd. and B. Blvd. Is the entrance to park going to be completed for park use? Are dead 5 • • Address Trees Sanitary Storm Water Comments/ Concerns ends going to stay pretty much the same without major trench? What determines if a tree is removed? VINCENT A VE 6006 Yes Yes every three years No No Can our blvd. tree be saved? line cleaned. Restoration work after construction is poor. I know I will have complaints regarding restoration. Maybe these issues can be resolved now with communication. T VASHB URN A VE 5837 2 trees, one on blvd. Cleaned lines 4 years No No Concerned about Summer Chase Apts. in a row. Found Too much money spent on fire and heavy roots. police for those apts. My snow removal service has a hard time plowing. There is no place to turn around to put snow in my yard. Poor design of street from day one. 5843 No blvd. trees. Lines cleaned twice in No. Need to keep Yes Concerned about neighborhood 2 -1/2 years. brush, etc. away from upkeep. Concerned about Summer drains. Chase Apt. conflicts. What's happening with old Jerry's store? 5906 -- Never have had a No We have the Yellow flowers should be taken care problem. best water. of in the Spring, as well as the purple grass in the Fall. 6 Address Trees Sanitary Storm Water Comments/ Concerns TVASHB URN A VE 5907 Yes Line cleaned once a No No Get rid of Summer Chase Apts. Need year. noise enforcement. 5918 Large Tree in front Line cleaned No No yard. numerous times. 5924 1 blvd. tree. Lines cleaned about No No Xerxes from 59"' to north of I694 is a every 10 years. rather uninviting place to walk with traffic on both sides and power lines above. I suggest planting trees staggered on both sides of the sidewalk. This would provide a cooler, more pleasant place to walk in the summer; make the traffic and power lines less noticeable and beautify the avenue. I think the trees planted on Shingle Creek Parkway have accomplished some of those goals. 5936 Blvd. trees. Sewer line cleaned No No No about every 6 months. 5937 -- Sometimes get a No No Sometimes a few neighbors try to smelly "sewer" odor become mechanics and driveways and in the bathroom and garages become cluttered with too kitchen sinks even many cars in various stages of through we flush them disrepair. This becomes an eye sore. out occasionally with Does code enforcement work here? Hilex and hot water. 7 Address Trees Sanitary Storm Water Comments/. Concerns WASHB URN A VE 5949 2 trees. Few years ago had No No No line cleaned. 6000 Trees removed. Haven't had a problem No No What's going to happen to ball park for a few years. traffic during construction? Code Enforcement needs improving. They cited some that didn't need it and didn't cite some that did. 6001 Blvd. tree. No No No Traffic problems on 60` to ball park. We have a large evergreen on blvd. we would like removed. 6006 No No No No No 6007 Trees in front yard. Yes, basement toilet No No No floods, and kitchen sink backs up. XERXES A VE. 5841 Large Elm tree. We have sewer No No No backups every 4 -6 months and have roots cut out. 5901 2 trees away from No No No Traffic on Xerxes seems to have sewer line. increased. The center boulevard on Xerxes would be nice to improve. 8 Address Trees Sanitary Storm Water Comments/ Concerns XERXES AVE. _ 5924 Elm tree in front yard. Line cleaned every 4 45 yrs. no problem. BC has best Xerxes has speeders and loud music yrs. water. from auto radios. Some back yards are an eye sore. Dog odors in summertime. 5925 No No No No Traffic is heavy on Xerxes when backing out into sheet. 5943 Yes Cleaned one time No No Neighbor who never mows or rakes yard. 6001 No No No No No 6006 Blvd tree. Our sanitary sewer is No Excessive Too many emergency vehicles on buckled under the chlorine in Xerxes. storm sewer 37 ft. our water. from our house for 4 Cannot drink feet. When they it. Have installed the storm bought sewer they had to redo bottled water it twice; they kept for 25 years. buckling my sanitary sewer because of roots from a large blvd. tree. We clean lines every 6 months to 1 year. YORK AVE 5836 No Lines cleaned almost No No No every year since we moved in 12 years ago. 9 • • ® f Address Trees Sanitary Storm Water Comments/ Concerns YORK AVE 5841 Trees are not real No No No No close to street. 5842 No No Flooding at Xerxes No Very heavy traffic on 59 "'. Can and 59 and 59 & anything be done to reduce the cut York Ave. through traffic? What's happening with the old Jerry's store? Site is an eye sore. Can we request the owners to clean it up. 5901 No No No No 5907 -- No Have flooding in my Water taste is Concerned about 59 "' becoming a driveway. poor. super highway. No one seems to do the speed limit or stop for Stop signs. Winter street parking not being enforced. Street lights and signs should not look industrial, they should be updated to a more pleasing look. 5912 Blvd. tree removed. Not since tree No No removal. 5919 Blvd. tree removed 3 No trouble since tree No No No years ago. was removed. 5925 No Sink drain clogged a No No No couple of times. 10 Address Trees Sanitary Storm Water Comments /.Concerns YORK AVE 5931 Elm tree. Lines cleaned every No Rust in water No year. about once a year. 5936 2 trees. Had line cleaned once No In Dec. 2001, Have people put garbage cans where in 5 years — no roots I had little they can't be seen from street. Some black things back yards need cleaning up. When that plugged construction starts, where do I park the screen on my car where it will be safe? We have my water tap. one Maple tree I want to save, the Cleaned them other one I would like removed. out and have had no problem since. 5942 Tree on blvd. Yes. Last serviced in No No No October 2000. 5943 Have several large Line cleaned yearly. No When they I have underground sprinklers and a trees. test hydrants I split rail fence to the street. sometimes experience problems. 5948 Blvd. tree. Lines cleaned about No No We have a block watch sign but don't every other year. have any block watch. 6000 -- Sewer has been No No I live on 60` & Xerxes and there is too cleaned twice in the many cars going from Brooklyn Blvd. last year or so. to ball park and to Xerxes. 11 • • Address Trees Sanitary Storm Water Comments/ Concerns ZENITH AVE 5835 Have Elm tree. Sewer cleaned once. No No No 5842 -- No No No Lots of traffic on 59 "'. People do not stop for Stop signs. 5925 Tree close to service. No No Hard water, Cars speed. There should be more use a lot of enforcement so the children are safe. salt for a family of four. 5942 Two trees in front Just moved in a year No No Cars go through Stop sign at 60 °1 & yard. ago but have had drain Zenith. Vendors using 63` & B. Blvd. cleaned. don't clean up after they leave. Makes the area look trashy. Do they need a permit for this? 6000 Elm in front yard. Lines cleaned once in No No The City needs to address its vacant 8 years. businesses. We've had issues with neighbors concerning live chickens and pigs. Drug dealing and teens out after curfew. 6007 -- We've had lines No No Plant trees for those destroyed. cleaned 3 times in four years. We've had sewer back up in basement. Plus standing water at main drain. 12 Address Trees Sanitary Storm Water Comments/ Concerns ZENITH AVE 6013 No blvd. trees. We have had service Corner of 60` & We Would like 60"' Ave. from Brooklyn cleaned several times Zenith there is periodically Blvd. to Beard be in -line with rest of in last 5 years. ponding. have brown 60` If you are not aware of it, it puts water. If we you into the incoming traffic of leave water westbound 69 We could use more on it clears in street lights. Please plant trees in the 15 -20 median on Xerxes. It would enhance seconds. our neighborhood. Do not like the fake red painted corners. Leave them natural. They look cheesy! 6019 No No No No Landscaping Workshop. 13 Gl l' QF: �RC 1O>C L: YW CENTER.PEN.QING:EISSESSM�NT:Rf� 1~ >:::<.;. ..;•;.;.;•;•;•;.;..:•;•;.; ...... • .....................• ....•...•...........•.•. ::::2111 02: ::N: DE . e .3 .. . fTY. OUTH:IMP O N7 .:•; <.;.:.;'•. . . . . .......... . .. . . . . ... . . .. . . . . . . . .:..:...:..:... .:•..... . . .:...:' ..........................:.: :: . •'•'•'•'•'•' •'•'•' '• • •'•••••.••••••... ............................R . .VEME .•...............•.••..,.,••........•....., ..... . . ..,•............ : <:: ;MFRQY�MEm : - RQJ> =G ;: YOQ2 5 & 0 ............ ............................... .... ..................:.......:.... ...........................:::: LE W' .51"REET ET.- ::::::: :::: .L EStl! . - ��� ... ...... R�'Y . ..........Agt7t�.... Af� ................ ...... .. ....... #.... .... ....:..... #.. ....:.5�£7�tM........ 02- 118 -21 -22 -0007 6006 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0008 6000 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0009 6007 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0010 6001 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0011 6000 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 1 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0012 6006 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00. $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0013 6007 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0014 6001 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0015 6000 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0016 6006 XERXES AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0017 5949 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0018 15943 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0019 5937 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0020 5931 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0021 5925 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0022 5919 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0023 5913 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0024 5907 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0025 5901 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0026 5900 XERXES AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 • 02- 118 -21 -22 -0027 5906 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0028 5912 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0029 5918 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0030 5924 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0031 5930 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0032 15936 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0033 15942 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0034 5948 XERXES AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0035 5949 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 1 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0036 5943 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0037 5937 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0038 5931 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0039 5925 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0040 5919 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0041 5913 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0042 5907 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0043 5901 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0044 15900 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0045 5906 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0046 5912 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0047 5918 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0048 5924 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0049 5930 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 =0050 5936 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0051 5942 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0052 5948 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 1 02- 118 -21 -22 -0053 5948 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0054 15942 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 e 02- 118 -21 -22 -0055 (CITY OF BC $1,203.50 $0.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0056 (CITY OF BC $1,711.00 $0.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0057 (CITY OF BC $2,914.50 $0.00 Page 1 GITY::QF: BRQQK�Y .N:C.r;NT�R:PIzKOING:ASSE$$M�NT RO. � ; / 11102: ® . :.. :R . : .. N;:. ... . ::GA DE error so i t3Tf1. MI'ROY . P V...... N . : . .... M PR OJE `r�:20 ............ ............ . ............................... ::.:.: ::::::LEV'r'. #.:.:.: 02- 118 -21 -22 -0058 CITY OF BC $2,914.50 $0.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0059 CITY OF BC $2,914.50 $0.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0060 CITY OF BC $2,914.50 $0.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0061 5906 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0062 5900 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0063 BC AMERICAN LITTLE LEAGUE $4,297.61 $0.00 102- 118 -21 -22 -0064 5901 UPTON AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 102-118-21-22-0065 5907 UPTON AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 102- 118 -21 -22 -0066 5913 UPTON AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 102- 118 -21 -22 -0067 5919 UPTON AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 102- 118 -21 -22 -0068 5924 UPTON AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 1 02- 118 -21 -22 -0069 5918 UPTON AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -22 -0070 5912 UPTON AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 1 02- 118 -21 -22 -0071 5906 UPTON AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02-118-21-22-0072 5900 UPTON AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 102- 118 -21 -22 -0074 6030 XERXES AVE N $10,527.40 $0.00 102- 118 -21 -22 -0075 6012 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 102- 118 -21 -22 -0076 BC ASSEMBLY OF GOD $2,400.00 $790.00 � 02- 118 -21 -22 -0077 BC ASSEMBLY OF GOD $0.00 $0.00 02- 118 -21 -23 -0001 5842 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 102- 118 -21 -23 -0002 5836 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 102- 118 -21 -23 -0003 5843 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 102- 118 -21 -23 -0004 5837 VINCENT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 102- 118 -21 -23 -0005 5836 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 102- 118 -21 -23 -0006 5842 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -23 -0007 5843 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -23 -0008 5837 WASHBURN AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -23 -0009 5836 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 02- 118 -21 -23 -0010 5842 XERXES AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -23 -0011 5842 UPTON AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -23 -0012 5836 UPTON AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -23 -0013 5843 UPTON AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -23 -0014 5837 UPTON AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 02- 118 -21 -23 -0015 2802 NORTHWAY DR $9,034.48 $0.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0001 15956 BEARD AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 1 03- 118 -21 -11 -0002 3318 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03-118-21-11-0003 3312 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 , 103- 118 -21 -11 -0004 3306 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0005 3300 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00' 103- 118 -21 -11 -0006 3218 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0007 3212 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0008 3206 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0009 3200 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0010 3118 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0011 3112 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0012 3106 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0013 3100 61ST AVE N $ 2,400.00 1 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0014 3018 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0015 3012 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 • 03- 118 -21 -11 -0016 3006 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0017 6101 XERXES AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0018 6025 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 Page 2 G ITY: QF: 3RQQK4YN : CENTER: PEN: QING:aSSE3.SMrzNT R LL. R EN .... ::::2.1 • ... elii�s i OttTH . M f�V ............ ............................... IMP MEN T PR :. .:2 002 ........ ............................... € E?R4. IwR7Y ICS RtSS:.:.:::.:.:.:::.::.::::::.:::.:.::..:.::::.:::,:.:.:., L1{ Y.#::. STfET:::::::::LEVX : #::::::STE�!RM:::::::: 103- 118 -21 -11 -0019 6019 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0020 6013 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0021 6012 BEARD AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0022 6018 BEARD AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 X03- 118 -21 -11 -0023 3319 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 1 03- 118 -21 -11 -0024 6025 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0025 6019 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03-118-21-11-0026 6013 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 X03- 118 -21 -11 -0027 6012 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0028 6018 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0029 6024 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0030 310161 ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0031 6019 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0032 6013 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0033 6012 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0034 6018 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0035 3107 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0036 3001 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0037 6019 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0038 6013 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0039 6012 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 • 03- 118 -21 -11 -0040 6018 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 1 03- 118 -21 -11 -0041 3009 61ST AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0042 6007 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0043 6001 XERXES AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0044 6000 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0045 6006 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0046 6007 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0047 6001 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0048 6000 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0049 6006 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0050 6007 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0051 6001 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0052 6000 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0053 6006 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0054 6007 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 1 03- 118 -21 -11 -0055 6001 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0056 6000 BEARD AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0057 6006 BEARD AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 (03- 118 -21 -11 -0058 5949 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0059 5943 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0060 5937 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0061 5931 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0062 5925 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0063 5919 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0064 5913 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0065 5907 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0066 5901 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0067 5900 BEARD AVE N $2.400.00 $790.00 • 03- 118 -21 -11 -0068 5906 BEARD AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 1 03- 118 -21 -11 -0069 5912 BEARD AVE N $2.400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0070 5918 BEARD AVE N $2 400.00 $790.00 Page 3 CITY l3.RQOK4Y N:CENTER:PERDW- 0:AS5E$SM�NT :ROLL :2111 02: . ... .... ..... .. i4RDE a '.;.... TFY SOUTH MPROVEMENTS >:: :::•: : «< % ':::::} .'.. V MfN7 RF2 ;lE :3 M.. R0 . .. .....Q . ............ G.............. ............................... . ................. a ..... a01DR t .. v #.......:.:.ar�r r.............:. v�r::.:.:.:.:.:.:.s 0 03- 118 -21 -11 -0071 5924 BEARD AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0072 5930 BEARD AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0073 5936 BEARD AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0074 5950 BEARD AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0075 5949 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0076 5943 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0077 5937 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0078 5931 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0079 5925 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0080 5919 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0081 5913 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 (03- 118 -21 -11 -0082 5907 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 (03- 118 -21 -11 -0083 5901 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0084 5900 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 (03- 118 -21 -11 -0085 5906 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 (03- 118 -21 -11 -0086 5912 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0087 5918 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0088 5924 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0089 5930 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0090 5936 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0091 5942 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 • �03- 118 -21 -11 -0092 5948 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0093 5949 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0094 5943 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 (03- 118 -21 -11 -0095 5937 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0096 5931 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 (03- 118 -21 -11 -0097 5925 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0098 5919 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0099 5913 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0100 5907 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0101 5901 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0102 5900 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0103 5906 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0104 5912 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0105 5918 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0106 5924 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0107 5930 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0108 5936 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0109 5942 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0110 5948 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0111 5949 XERXES AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0112 5943 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0113 5937 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0114 5931 XERXES AVEN $1,755.00 $0.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0115 5925 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0116 5919 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0117 5913 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0118 5907 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0119 5901 XERXES AVE N $2 $790.00 0 103-118-21-11-0120 5900 YORK AVE N $2 $790.00 X03- 118 -21 -11 -0121 5906 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0122 5912 YORK AVE, N $2.40000 $790.00 Page 4 GITY:0 - .a.RDOKLXN CENTER:PEN:DING:A$$ES$MENT. :RQ V: 21:x: 2: !0 • '... CITY. .... 1 ..... : ... NT .:: .. .::: . ...:. ..:...:.:...:.:.:.:.:..:...: : ::.........::..... ........i�Y . , [tTli MPROVEME ..............•.•.•. .......•. •.•.•.•....•................... . :.:...........::.....•.....•............... ,.,............................ . ] P VEME1�}T PRO;JEG? :2002; 5: &:06 :::::::::: ::•:•:::..... •:•:•:•:•: :•:•:.:•:•:•::•:::::.....M..R4 ............ ... . . .200 . 0..................... ............................... . ::::::::::I?RO .. �R7X .ICJ .............AC2C}t�..... AE} URES$............................................. . #..:.,.:.,.... STREET.:.:..... L�StX : #:.:.:.:.:.:.:.5�'dF�M..... ( 03- 118 -21 -11 -0123 5918 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0124 5924 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 X03- 118 -21 -11 -0125 5930 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -11 -0126 5936 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0127 5942 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -11 -0128 5948 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118- 21 -12- 0003,7,8 6000 BROOKLYN BLVD $8,874.00 $4,284.00 03- 118 -21 -12 -0004 5960 BROOKLYN BLVD $4,408.00 $2,128.00 03- 118 -21 -12 -0005 5964 BROOKLYN BLVD $4,930.00 $2,380.00 03- 118 -21 -12 -0006 5930 BROOKLYN BLVD $9,164.00 $4,424.00 103- 118 -21 -12 -0007 N OF 6000 BROOKLYN BLVD $4,234.00 $2,044.00 103- 118 -21 -12 -0008 N OF 6000 BROOKLYN BLVD $4,872.00 $2,352.00 103- 118 -21 -12 -0075 6101 BEARD AVE N $13,136.42 $6,341.72 103- 118 -21 -12 -0095 5920 BROOKLYN BLVD $17,914.75 $8,648.50 103- 118 -21 -13 -0040 5842 BROOKLYN BLVD $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -14 -0002 5841 XERXES AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -14 -0003 5835 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 03- 118 -21 -14 -0004 5836 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -14 -0005 5842 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -14 -0006 5841 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -14 -0007 5835 YORK AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 • 03- 118 -21 -14 -0008 5836 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -14 -0009 5842 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -14 -0010 5841 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -14 -0011 5835 ZENITH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -14 -0012 5836 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 03- 118 -21 -14 -0013 5842 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -14 -0014 330159TH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -14 -0015 5835 ABBOTT AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -14 -0016 3315 59TH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -14 -0017 3321 59TH AVE N $2,400.00 $790.00 103- 118 -21 -14 -0026 5825 XERXES AVE N $6,838.00 $0.00 134- 119 -21 -44 -0099 6103 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 134 -119 -21-44 -0100 6107 XERXES AVE N $1,755.00 $0.00 134 -119 -21-44 -0101 6113 XERXES AVE N $1,755,00 $0.00 35- 119 -21 -33 -0064 6120 XERXES AVE N $5,876.00 $0.00 TOTAL PENDING $639,044.16 $190,602.22 • Page 5 0 City Council Agenda Item No. 9a 0 0 • MEMO To: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager From: Ronald A. Warren, Planning and Zoning Specialist Subject: City Council Consideration Item - Planning Commission Application No. 2002- 001 Date: February 6, 2002 On the February 11, 2002 City Council Agenda is Planning Commission Application No. 2002- 00 1 submitted by Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC requesting Rezoning and Site and Building Plan approval through the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process for the redevelopment of the SuperAmerica convenience store /gas station at the Southwest corner of 57th and Logan Avenues North. Attached for your review are copies of the Planning Commission Information Sheet for Planning Commission Application No. 2002 -001 and also an area map showing the location of the property under consideration, various site and building plans for the proposed redevelopment, the Planning Commission minutes relating to the Commission's consideration of this matter and other supporting documents. This matter was considered by the Plamling Commission at their January 31, 2002 meeting and was recommended for approval through Planning Commission Resolution No. 2002 -01. It is recommended that the City Council, following consideration of this matter, approve the application subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. A resolution outlining the history of the application along with findings and conditions of approval is offered for the City Council's consideration. Also, an ordinance amendment redescribing the property to be rezoned within this Planned Unit Development is offered for first reading by the City Council. The new description contained in the plat will be used for the ordinance amendment. The final plat will have to be approved and filed before the description can be utilized. • • Application Filed on 1 -03 -02 City Council Action Should Be Taken By 3 -04 -02 (60 Days) Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 2002 -001 Applicant: Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC Location: Southwest Corner of 57th and Logan Avenues North Request: Rezoning /Site and Building Plan - PUD /C -2 The applicant, Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC, is seeking rezoning and site and building plan approval through the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process for the redevelopment of the existing SuperAmerica site to include the adjacent property to the immediate west and south of the site. The property in question is zoned C -2 (Commerce) and R -I (One Family Residence) and is located at the southwest corner of 57th Avenue North and Logan Avenue North. It includes the existing SuperAmerica site (1901 57th Avenue North), a portion of the Milavetz law firm property (1915 57th Avenue North) and the residential property at 5649 Logan Avenue North. Companion Application No. 2002 -002 consists of a preliminary plat that will divide and combine the effected parcels to create a new lot for the SuperAmerica proposal. • The property in question is bounded on the north by 57th Avenue (a County Road) with commercially zoned property on the opposite side of the street; on the east by Logan Avenue North with R -1 zoned property on the opposite side of the street; on the south by single family homes located on R -1 zoned property; and on the west by commercially zoned property (C -2). The applicant's plan is to demolish the exiting SuperAmerica convenience store /gasoline station/canopy and the house and garage at 5649 Logan Avenue and then build a new, approximately 3,900 sq. ft. convenience store with six new pumping dispensers and a new canopy. The store would be located to the west and south of its present location. The applicant is seeking the PUD /C -2 rezoning to accommodate the above mentioned commercial redevelopment. The C -2 (Commerce) underlying zoning designation is being sought because it acknowledges the proposed use as special uses in that zoning district. The applicants are seeking modifications to the C -2 requirements to allow: a gas station to abut R -1 zoned property; a slight encroachment on a 35 ft. buffer area; a less than 15 ft. green strip along the 57th Avenue North right of way; and to also allow signs on the canopy at the proposed site as a second freestanding sign. These modifications are proposed to make a more efficiently utilized site and they believe will be offset by various planned considerations and aspects of the development plan that will mitigate these modifications. The land in question is acknowledged in the City's zoning ordinance and, to a lesser extent, in the Comprehensive Plan as being for commercial retail uses. • 1 -31 -02 Page 1 • As the Commission is aware, a Planned Unit Development proposal involves the rezoning of land to the PUD designation followed by an alpha numeric designation of the underlying zoning district. This underlying zoning district provides the regulations governing uses and structures within the Planned Unit Development. The rules and regulations governing that district (in this case C -2) would apply to the development proposal. One of the purposes of the PUD district is to give the City Council the needed flexibility in addressing redevelopment problems and issues. Regulations governing uses and structures may be modified by conditions ultimately imposed by the City Council on the development plans. As mentioned, in this case the applicant is seeking modifications to allow this gas station to abut R -1 zoned property; a slight encroachment into a 35 ft. buffer strip required where R -1 and C -2 property abut; a 10 ft. rather than 15 ft. green strip along the 57th Avenue North right of way; and to be allowed to have identification signs on the canopy as a second freestanding sign. Their rationale for seeking these modifications has to do with providing a more efficient use of the property which, as they point out in their submission, is to move the building and activity areas away from the existing single family residential uses to the east and south. They propose large buffer areas, landscape and 8 ft. high opaque screening walls where the property would abut with single family residential property. They point out that they believe that the additional site area and new building will allow them to better and more completely serve the neighbors and the community by increasing the variety and type of products in their stores and the number and design of fueling points. They also believe their proposal will be more compatible with the immediate neighbors by allowing them to relocate the east edge of their store 100 ft. and their • canopy and fuel dispensers 60 ft. from Logan Avenue. They also note that they believe the activity on the site will be significantly relocated to the west, much deeper into the commercial district, which is located along 57th Avenue and farther away from the residences on Logan. Their plan, they indicate, will provide significant area adjacent to the side yards of the neighboring homes on Logan and the back yards of two neighbors on Brookview Drive. They point out that this area will be landscaped and fenced to optimize the effectiveness of the buffer area. They state that they believe that the store will comply with all current city perfomlance standards and will also incorporate techniques to calm the design and operation of the store. The less than 15 ft. green strip proposal along 57th Avenue North is consistent with other city approvals that have allowed such a green strip along a major thoroughfare where decorative screen walls or other screening devices have been used. This was done at Brookdale in a couple locations along Xerxes Avenue and County Road 10. Also a gas station was approved at the northwest corner of 69th and Brooklyn Boulevard, although it never was built, with less than a 15 ft. green strip. This was offset by a 3 1/2 ft. high decorative wall. The applicant's proposal has a combined masonry and wrought iron screen wall along 57th Avenue North, which is proposed to offset the lessened green strip. They also propose 8 ft. high opaque screening adjacent to the R -1 zoned properties to the south based on discussions and negotiations they have had with those neighbors providing them with an acceptable type of screening device. The Planning Commission's attention is directed to Section 35 -355 of the city's zoning ordinance, which addresses Planned Unit Developments (attached). • 1 -31 -02 Page 2 • BA- K (TR OT T1SIQ The site of the SuperAmerica station at 57th and Logan Avenues North plays deeply into the zoning history of the City of Brooklyn Center. SuperAmerica in the mid 1960's proposed to rezone its current site from R -1 to C -2 and to build the convenience store /gas station complex that is currently there. The City, following public hearings, review of the matter and much discussion and deliberation originally refused to approve the SuperAmerica development primarily because they believed it was an in appropriate mix of uses, that the site was too small, that parking was insufficient and site circulation was difficult at best. SuperAmerica sued the City and following a lengthy court battle, won a decision that they should be allowed to utilize the land in question in the mamier they proposed. Even during the plan review process, the City objected to many aspects of the SuperAmerica plan. They were, however, implemented over the objections of the City and the development proceeded. The City in the meantime amended its zoning regulations in a number of ways and established Section 35 -414 of the City Ordinances regarding special requirements for gasoline service stations. In many respects, the SuperAmerica station that was being developed in 1968 did not meet these standards set out for gasoline station development in Brooklyn Center. The ordinance required a minimum 20,000 sq. ft. site located on a major thoroughfare; required parking on the basis of both the gasoline service station formula and the retail parking fonnula; and, among other things, prohibited gasoline stations from abutting R -1, R -2 or R -3 zoned property either at a property line or a street line. These regulations went into effect in 1968 and, for all practical purposes, established the SuperAmerica • as a non - conforming use, which could not expand, be enlarged, be altered or if destroyed by more than 50 percent, could not be reestablished. The existing SuperAmerica station, I believe, shows that the City was correct in its judgment that the site was too small, there is insufficient parking, and circulation on the site is not good. The policy of the City for almost 35 years has been that the SuperAmerica in this location will be tolerated but not expanded. The applicants are coming forward with a plan that they believe will be beneficial not only to them but to the city as well. The question is whether or not this is in the best interest of the community and whether or not a modified plan is appropriate and should be pursued. The PUD process is a vehicle established which can appropriately handle this type of development request by the applicants. The key is the deternlination of whether or not this is indeed in the best interests of the community. The staff's comments to the applicant when they first proposed these new modifications was that if an acceptable development proposal can be put forward, it is possible to rezone the property and take the SuperAmerica property out of its non - conforming situation it is in. R EZONTN(T The PUD process involves a rezoning of land and, therefore, is subject to the rezoning procedures outlined in Section 35 -210 of the Zoning Ordinance as well as being consistent with the City's Rezoning Evaluation Policy and Review Guidelines contained in Section 35 -208. The 1 -31 -02 Page 3 policy and review guidelines are attached for the Commission's review. The applicant has • submitted a written project narrative describing their proposal along with a written statement in response to the Rezoning Evaluation Policy and Review Guidelines. Both of these written submission are attached for the Commission's review. The written project narrative explains their proposed development and highlights the site and building plans submitted with the application. This PUD combines the various parcels previously mentioned through a preliminary plat, which is the subject of companion Application No. 2002 -002. The site of the proposed SuperAmerica redevelopment is 1.139 acres. The concept that they are using for the layout of this site positions the building as far to the west as is possible with the activity areas on the north side of the building (57th Avenue North side) and establishes a large buffer or landscape yard between the site and the residences to the south. As with all rezoning requests, the Planning Commission must review the proposal based on the Rezoning Evaluation Policy and Review Guidelines contained in the Zoning Ordinance. The policy states that zoning classifications must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and must not constitute "spot zoning ", which is defined as a zoning decision which discriminates in favor of a particular land owner and does not relate to the Comprehensive Plan or accepted planning principles. Each rezoning proposal must be considered on its merits and measured against the City's policy and against the various guidelines, which have been established for rezoning review. The following is a review of the rezoning guidelines contained in the zoning ordinance, as we believe they relate to the applicant's comments and their proposal. ® A. Is there a clear and public need or benefit? The applicant indicates that they believe their proposal will allow them to not only serve the neighbors in the community better but also more compatibly. They point out that the additional site area, its extension to the west and more importantly the increased depth from 57th Avenue will allow them to better and more completely serve the neighbors in the community by increasing the variety and type of products in their store and the number and design of their fueling points. They also believe that the proposed plan will be more compatible with the immediate neighbors in three ways. First, the additional site area to the west will allow them to relocate the east edge of the store 100 ft. and the canopy for the fuel dispensers 60 ft. farther from Logan Avenue. Activity on the site, they note, will significantly be relocated to the west, deeper into the commercial district along 57th Avenue and farther from the residences on Logan. Second, their proposed plan, they believe, provides a significant area adjacent to the side yard and garage of the neighboring home on Logan, and the back yards of the two neighbors on Brookview Drive. These areas, they state, will be landscaped and fenced to optimize the effectiveness of this buffer area. Third, they believe the new store will comply with current city performance standards will incorporate techniques to calm the design and the operation of the store which will be recorded and enforced through this PUD process. • 1 -31 -02 Page 4 • It is the staff s opinion that this redevelopment can be seen as meeting a clear and public need or benefit if it is consistent with the development criteria established by the City and if indeed it balances the business needs of the community and the residential needs of adjoining properties as well. It is not anticipated that their proposal will be a detriment, but, on the other hand, it should be a positive factor in providing benefits that positively affect the community as well as the applicant. B. Is the proposed zoning consistent and compatible with the surrounding land use clarifications? The applicant notes that the commercial development and the use on the south side of 57th Avenue has historically provided the transition between the commercial uses recognized in the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance along both sides of 57th and the surrounding residential districts. Allowing the new investment proposed in this development plan by SuperAmerica will not be an exception to the planned, permitted, historic and expected pattern of use along 57th Avenue and will expand and reinforce the usefulness of this established commercial district for its neighbors and the city. The staff would concur with the comments made. We believe, as will be shown later in the site plan review, that this proposed commercial development and gasoline station can be considered consistent and compatible with the surrounding • land use classifications given the development considerations being proposed such as a buffer area, adequate, acceptable screening, the fact that the rear of the building will not be used as an activity area with limited lighting and comments that the applicant has made regarding noise mitigation with respect to required speakers at pumps under the canopy. C. Can all proposed uses in the proposed zoning district be contemplated for development of the subject property? The applicant notes that the requested PUD designation will limit the potential use of this property to solely the use approved in the development plan while allowing the protection and buffering of abutting residential properties provided by the development and the detail of residential transition zone. They note that the development of this zone in the westward relocation of the fuel dispensers and store in the activity zone, will substitute for the citywide zoning provision that would not permit the proposed redevelopment abutting residential properties located along Logan and Brookview Drive. It will also permit approval of specific features of the development plan that are accustomed to the conditions surrounding this site. We would concur with the applicant's comments. Although the zoning ordinance discourages gasoline stations from abutting residentially zoned property, we have, 1 -31 -02 Page 5 I ' - • through various studies over the past eight to ten years changed somewhat this idea in that it is believed that gas stations can be appropriately screened and buffered from abutting residential properties given some extraordinary screening, landscaping and buffering devices. As the development plan will show, we believe the measures taken are appropriate and compatibility can be achieved between these two p otentiall Y conflictin g land uses. D. Have there been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in this area since the subject property was zoned? The applicant notes that since the construction of this store, the City has adopted regulations that would not allow a new store to be adjacent to a residential use at this location. The requested zoning change to PUD is the most direct and careful approach to allow the benefits of the new store in the expanded site and provide protection for the adjoining properties. The staff would comment by acknowledging the past history, which required the SuperAmerica station to be built over the objection of the City. We believe the City was correct in its analysis back in the late 1960's that indicated that the site was too small, lacked parking and created congestion on the site and adjoining streets. The use of the site, however, as a convenience store has proven beneficial to the immediate and surrounding neighborhoods. There are no other such facilities serving the southeast portion of Brooklyn Center and parts of north Minneapolis as well. It can be said that the gas station/convenience store does serve a basic need of the community. It is from this perspective that we believe modifications to the site to make it a better operation is an appropriate goal. The adoption of the Planned Unit Development ordinance a number of years ago gives the City the flexibility to deal with development issues and to provide modifications to its ordinance based on acceptable development plans that mitigate or make situations compatible. We believe this to be the case in this specific situation. E. In the case of city initiated rezoning proposals, is there a broad public purpose evident? This evaluation criteria is not applicable in this case because it is not a city initiated zoning proposal, but rather a developer initiated proposal. F. Will the subject project bare fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed zoning district? The applicant notes that the PUD will allow the protection and buffering of abutting residential properties provided by the development and the detail of a residential transition zone, and the westward relocation of the fuel dispensers and • 1 -31 -02 Page 6 • store in the activity zone, to substitute for the citywide zoning provision that would not permit a proposed redevelopment of abutting residential properties located on Logan and on Brookview Drive. They go on to site as outlined in their written submittal noting the establishment of a residential transition zone with no exterior activity extending 75 to 85 feet from the shared property line; a lighting plan that restricts almost all ambient light of more than one foot candle to the activity zone; a noise mitigation plan that includes relocation of activity on the site away from Logan and the use of fuel dispensers mounted with fueling point specific microphones and speakers for required communication; a circulation plan that relocates the driveways farther away from the intersection of 57th and Logan; a more than doubling of the area of the store expanding product mix and depth of the store; a plan for plantings along Logan that reinforces the residential edge and introduces architectural fence features as well as expanded yard to define and reinforce 57th Avenue edge; and an architectural metal and masonry fence to offset the 10 ft. rather than 15 ft. landscaped area on 57th Avenue. The staff generally believes that the subject property will bear the ordinance development restrictions for this Planned Unit Development even with the deviations from the standard ordinance requirements mentioned. We believe providing a good buffer and redevelopment in this area offsets these modifications. The screening and buffering provided, we believe, is very appropriate, the lack of lighting and activity to the rear of the building should be of benefit to the neighboring properties and the individualized communication devices mounted at the fuel dispensing stations should eliminate or reduce the amount of noise on the site from required communication devices. All in all we believe the proposals made by the applicant are appropriate. G. Is the subject property generally unsuited for uses permitted in the present zoning district with respect to size, configuration, topography or location? The applicant indicates that the designation of this site as a PUD will allow the replacement of the present non - conforming store within an expanded store on an expanded site which could not occur under the present zoning provisions. The staff would concur with the comments made by the applicant. The expanded site makes for a more efficient use by SuperAinerica. We do not believe that the City's current policy with respect to the SuperAmerica site of not allowing expansion should be continued. An appropriate redevelopment, such as being proposed, should go forward. H. Will the rezoning result in an expansion of a zoning district warranted by: 1. Comprehensive Planning; 2. Lack of Developable Land in the Proposed Zoning District, or; 3. The Best Interest of the Community? 1 -31 -02 Page 7 • The staff would comment that the proposed zoning can be considered consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area. We are not proposing to change the commercial nature of this or surrounding properties. We also believe that the proposed development can be considered to be in the best interest of the community if it is developed in the manner that is being proposed. This appears to be a good balance between the commercial needs and the residential needs of the community. I. Does the proposal demonstrate merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of an individual parcel? The applicant notes that each element of their development plan is designed to reduce the impact of their store operations on the neighborhood while providing a state of the art facility for the best possible shopping and service experience for their customers. Again, the staff would concur with the developers comments and note that the proposal does appear to have merit beyond just the particular interests of the developer and will lead to a redevelopment that we believe is consistent and compatible with the surrounding land uses. This proposal appears to provide a good development, consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the general interest of the community. SITE ANT) RI TTT.T MG PLAN PROpOSAT, The proposal calls for an approximate 3,900 sq. ft. convenience store /gas station with six gasoline dispensers under a canopy area at 1901 57th Avenue North. ACCESS/PARKING Access to this site will be provided from two driveway locations, one along Logan Avenue and the other on 57th Avenue North. The Logan Avenue entrance will be shifted to the south of its present location to better align with the proposed layout for the site. The 57th Avenue entrance will be shifted to the west with the existing access from 57th being closed. 57th Avenue North is a county road and a driveway permit from the County will be required, however, it is not anticipated that there will be objection from the County. As mentioned previously, the old SuperAmerica store and dispensing areas will be demolished with new ones being rebuilt. Existing underground tanks will be removed and new tanks will be provided on the westerly side of the site. Six dispensing stations will be located under a new canopy. Circulation through the site will be either from the access on 57th through to Logan or vice versa, from Logan to 57th. Parking for this approximate 3,969 sq. ft. building is 22 spaces based on a parking formula of 5.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The applicant's plan shows 21 parking spaces in front of the building and has the capability of providing at least six more pump island parking ® 1 -31 -02 Page 8 • spaces. Practically speaking, 12 spaces will probably be utilized at the pump islands. Adequate drive lanes serving the pump island areas and parking spaces are provided on the site. A trash container is located to the west of the building and the area in front of the trash container will be used for the parking of delivery vehicles and access for a garbage truck. GR A DING /DR A INA G 1 JTTT ITIF S The applicant has provided a grading, drainage and utility plan, which is being reviewed by the City Engineer. It should be noted that an erosion control plan has also been submitted and appears to be appropriate. All storm drainage will be collected in catch basins and conveyed underground to storm sewer in 57th Avenue North. Water and sewer connections will be tied into water and sewer lines in Logan Avenue North. The City Engineer will be reviewing these plans and making comments, which we will pass along to the Commission as we receive them. The site is under five acres in area and no Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission review is required. LAN SCAPIN(T The applicant has submitted a landscape plan in response to the landscape point system utilized by the Commission to evaluate such plans. This 1.139 acre site requires 91.12 points. The applicant proposes to exceed this minimum point requirement by providing 260 landscape points. They provide a variety of plantings including Norway Maple, Red Maple, Seedless Green Ash, • Pin Oak, as well as shrubs such as Pyramidal Arborvitae and Vibernum. On the landscape plan they have shown visibility triangles where plantings and other obstructions will not create site line problems. The landscape plan also shows the various screening devices that will be utilized to screen abutting residential property. Along the south property line, the applicants are proposing to provide a board on board 8 ft. high opaque fence adjacent to the property at 5639 Logan Avenue North. An 8 ft. high cedar decorative stockade screening fence will be provided between this site and the properties at 1918 Brookview Drive and 2000 Brookview Drive. An 8 ft. high board on board fence will be placed between the SuperAmerica site and the Milavetz law firm to the west. These screening devices have been agreed upon by adjoining property owners in discussions with representatives from SuperAmerica and, it is our understanding, that they are acceptable screening devices. The applicant, in lieu of providing a 15 ft. green strip along 57th Avenue North, is proposing a decorative masonry and aluminum fence. Block and concrete masonry piers approximately 30 ft. apart with aluminum bars in between will be provided. This appears to be a nicely done fence and should provide appropriate screening consistent with other approvals where the City has allowed less than 15 ft. green strips. Underground irrigation will be provided in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance in accordance with the requirements of city ordinances. 1 -31 -02 Page 9 BI JI DING s The applicant has submitted building plans for the new proposed building. Building exteriors will be a split face single score architectural concrete block on the lower portion of the building with a smooth face single score architectural concrete block around the upper level. Colors are a light gray and white. The building will have a black shingled, hip style roof with screening on the back or rear side for roof top equipment. Display windows are located along the north and a portion of the east walls. Wall signs are proposed that are within the limits allowed under the City's sign ordinance. The canopy over the pump dispensers will not be illuminated and will contain gray, white and red stripes. The applicant has proposed to be allowed to have the SuperAmerica logo and SuperAinerica identification signs on the east, north and west faces of the canopy. They request that they be allowed to have these signs on the canopy in recognition of the fact that they are putting up less than what they are allowed to put up for wall signery on the site. It has been explained that canopy signs are considered to be a form of freestanding sign unless they can meet the criteria laid out in the sign ordinance for wall signs. The signs do not meet that criteria and, under the sign ordinance, are only allowed in lieu of permitted freestanding signery. The staff believes there is appropriate signery without the canopy signs and the applicants are not willing to have canopy signs in lieu of their freestanding signery. We believe it would be a bad precedent to allow SuperAmerica signs on the canopy as they would be the only gasoline station in Brooklyn Center allowed such consideration. Furthermore, the reduced amount of wall signs • does not, in our opinion, justify the canopy signs. There appears to be enough necessary signery without canopy signs. We, therefore, do not recommend that this aspect of their proposal be acknowledged as an approved part of their Planned Unit Development. LIGHTINCT ANT) TRASH The applicant has submitted a lighting plan indicating the proposed lighting for the site. They intend to use four perimeter pole fixtures, one at each driveway, one at the edge of the parking area east of the store and one above the underground tanks on the west edge of the site. Also, there will be lighting under the canopy above the fuel dispensers. They note that the light intensity drops to less than one foot candle at the property line and, with the exception of the area immediately at the base of the pole fixture illuminating the parking area, it is below one foot candle in all residential transition zones. All fixtures will be shielded and directed on the site to avoid glare to abutting properties. It should be noted that the lights in the canopy will be flush with the canopy, which we understand is a new design for SuperAmerica. No lighting will exist between the building and the residential property to the south other than a light over the exit on the back of the building, which would be activated only when the exit is used. The plan indicates a trash enclosure area to be west of and adjacent to the building. The screening device will be a masonry structure to match the existing building. Gates for the device should be solid opaque material and not chain link with plastic slats. 1 -31 -02 Page 10 • PROCEDURE Normally rezoning applications that are considered by the Planning Commission are referred to the respective Neighborhood Advisory Group, in this case the Southeast Neighborhood Advisory Group. State Statutes require the City to respond to zoning applications within a 60 day time frame from the date a properly submitted application has been filed with the City. This application was filed on January 3, 2002. Due to zoning requirements for notice and publication, this application needs to be submitted approximately four weeks prior to the Planning Commission's public hearing. The clock, however, begins on the date the application is accepted. Therefore, the zoning decision must be made by the City Council no later than March 4, 2002. Almost 30 days of the required 60 day time frame will have expired before the Planning Commission's public hearing is even held. This requirement makes it difficult for the City to hold the Neighborhood Advisory Group meetings we normally have. The Planning Commission has instituted a new procedure because it still wishes to receive Neighborhood Advisory Group input with respect to these rezoning applications. We have invited the Southeast Neighborhood Advisory Group members to the meeting and are encouraging their comments and participation at this evening's meeting. A staff report will be delivered to the Neighborhood Advisory Group members at the same time that it is delivered the Planning Commission members. Hopefully, they will have an opportunity to review the matter and to make comment to the Commission at Thursday evening's meeting. It should be noted that representatives of SuperAmerica met with neighboring property owners and members of the Neighborhood Advisory Group at a meeting that was held at the Earle Brown Elementary School on December 11, 2001. The applicants have • indicated that they have talked with approximately 15 neighbors and are attempting to address any issues that were raised. It was their sense that the effected neighbors tended to support their proposal as being more compatible with the neighborhood than the existing facility. A public hearing has been scheduled and notices have appeared in the Brooklyn Center Sun/Post and notices have also been sent to neighboring property owners. The Planning Commission, following the public hearing, should consider a draft resolution, which has been prepared in anticipation of a favorable reaction to this proposal. The resolution is offered for the Planning Commission's consideration. • 1 -31 -02 Page 11 1111 l � 11\ � ■ `� .i ism Rai ISM / /t / / /tt YY� \ ■ 1112E • 1111111 111111 811111/1 11�1� 1111�l1 1111111 11 1111 •••• 11111111111111 =IIIIIIlI1iIt 11■ - -• 111 •.•.. i ,,,, • � 111 1111 111 11 ■ '' �` t � " ' tl� ■J 111 It11 11111 11 INN 111111 / , 111 = 111111 � �1 • •• 1 � ■ 111 111■11 � 1 1 1111 Ii111/ IIIIti _1111111 t• t - 11 111 1111 111 IIt11 111 • 11111 " � IIIIIG►'� III I i �`' ■�■ t ■�■ t 111 �i11 I � � . � �� �I �■ . � ; sir: IL'., : , ::` � ���I•.j!�111111111;; °i ;■'� � ■ ��� ��` 11 ���i 1111 � �- • • . ° . '`¢' • g'tcy,5 '.`" ' y SS E. r r •:iiu • ; �. &,�, mown h , s • • • F - �'�; n .��.tr. 6JC'y�.fsa *��+SF������ ',� T3e„,��` c. Accessory uses incidental to the foregoing principal uses when located on the same ' ro e p p rty with the use to which it is accessory but not including any business or industrial uses. Such accessory uses to include but not be restricted to the following: 1. Off- street parking. 2. Public recreational buildings and parks, playgrounds and athletic fields. 3. Signs as permitted in the Brooklyn Center Sign Ordinance. Section 35 -355. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. Subdivision 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) district is to promote flexibility in land development and redevelopment, preserve aesthetically significant and environmentally sensitive site features, conserve energy and ensure a high quality of design. Subdivision 2. Classification of PUD Districts; Permitted Uses; Applicable Regulations. a. Upon rezoning for a PUD, the district shall be designated by the letters "PUD" followed by the alphanumeric designation of the underlying zoning district which may be either the prior zoning classification or a new classification. In cases of mixed use PUDs, the City Council shall, whenever reasonably practicable, specify underlying zoning classifications for the various parts of the PUD. When it is not reasonably practicable to so specify underlying zoning classifications, the Council may rezone the district, or any part thereof, to "PUD - MIXED." b. Regulations governing uses and structures in PUDs shall be the same as those governing the underlying zoning district subject to the following: 1. Regulations may be modified expressly by conditions imposed by the Council at the time of rezoning to PUD. 2. Regulations are modified by implication only to the extent necessary to comply with the development plan of the PUD. 3. In the case of districts rezoned to PUD - MIXED, the Council shall specify regulations applicable to uses and structures in various parts of the district. 35 -45 , I c. For purposes of determining applicable regulations for uses or structures on land adjacent to or in the vicinity of the PUD district which depend on the zoning of the PUD district, the underlying zoning classification of PUD districts shall be deemed to be the zoning classification of the district. In the case of a district zoned PUD - MIXED, the underlying zoning lassification shall be deemed to be the classification which h allows as a ermitt p ed use any use which is permitted in the PUD district and which results in the most restrictive regulation of adjacent or nearby properties. Subdivision 3. Development Standards. a. A PUD shall have a minimum area of one acre, excluding land included within the floodway or flood fringe overlay districts and excluding existing rights -of -way, unless the City finds that at least one of the following conditions exists: 1. There are unusual physical features of the property or of the surrounding neighborhood such that development as a PUD will conserve a physical or terrain feature of importance to the neighborhood or community; 2. The property is directly adjacent to or across a public right -of -way from property which previously was developed as a PUD and the new PUD will be perceived as and function as an extension of that previously approved development; or 3. The property is located in a transitional area between different land uses and the development will be used as a buffer between the uses. b. Within a PUD, overall density for residential developments shall be consistent with Section 35 -400 of this ordinance. Individual buildings or lots within a PUD may exceed these standards, provided that density for the entire PUD does not exceed the penmitted standards. C. Setbacks, buffers and greenstrips within a PUD shall be consistent with Section 35 -400 to 35 -414 and Section 35 -700 of this ordinance unless the developer can demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that a lesser standard should be permitted with the addition of a screening treatment or other mitigative measures. d. Parking provided for uses within a PUD shall be consistent with the parking requirements contained in Section 35 -704 of this ordinance unless the developer can demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that a lesser standard should be permitted on the grounds of the complementarity of peak parking demands by the uses within the PUD. The City may require execution of a restrictive covenant limiting future use of the property to those uses which will continue this parking complementarity, or which are otherwise approved by the City. 35 -46 t Subdivision 4. General Standards. a. The City may allow more than one principal building to be constructed on each platted lot within a PUD. b. A PUD which involves only one land use or a single housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the purposes and objectives of this section. c. A PUD may only contain uses consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. d. All property to be included within a PUD shall be under unified ownership or control or subject to such legal restrictions or covenants as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the approved development plan and site plan. e. The uniqueness of each PUD requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities, public facilities and the approval of land subdivision may be subject to modifications from the City Ordinances generally governing them. The City Council may, therefore, approve streets, utilities, public facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with usual specifications or ordinance requirements where it is found that such are not required in the interests of the residents or of the City. Subdivision 5. Application and Review. • a. Implementation of a PUD shall be controlled b the develo merit 1 y develop merit The development plan may be approved or disapproved by the City Council after evaluation by the Planning Commission. Submission of the development plan shall be made to the Director of Planning and Inspection on such forms and accompanied by such information and documentation as the City may deem necessary or convenient, but shall include at a minimum the following: 1. Street and utility locations and sizes; 2. A drainage plan, including location and size of pipes and water storage areas; 3. A grading plan; 4. A landscape plan; 5. A lighting plan; 6. A plan for timing and phasing of the development; 7. Covenants or other restrictions proposed for the regulation of the development; 3 5-47 8. A site plan showing the location of all structures and parking areas; 9. Building renderings or elevation drawings of all sides of all buildings to be constructed in at least the first phase of development; and 10. Proposed underlying zoning classification or classifications. Such information may be in a preliminary form, but shall be sufficiently complete and accurate to allow an evaluation of the development by the City. b. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the development plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be published in the official newspaper and actual notice shall be mailed to the applicant and adjacent property owners as required by Section 3 5-2 10 of this ordinance. The Planning Commission shall review the development plan and make such recommendations as it deems appropriate regarding the plan within the time limits established by Section 35 -210 of this ordinance. c. Following receipt of the recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City Council shall hold such hearing as it deems appropriate regarding'the matter. The City Council shall act upon the development plan within the time limits established by Section 3 5-2 10 of this ordinance. Approval of the development plan shall constitute rezoning of the property to PUD and conceptual approval of the elements of the plan. In addition to the guidelines ® provided in Section 35 -208 of this ordinance, the City Council shall base its actions on the rezoning upon the following criteria: 1. Compatibility of the plan with the standards, purposes and intent of this section; 2. Consistency of the plan with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; 3. The impact of the plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located; and 4. The adequacy of internal site organization, uses, densities, circulation, parking facilities, public facilities, recreational areas, open spaces, and buffering and landscaping. The City Council may attach such conditions to its, approval as it may determine to be necessary to better accomplish the purposes of the PUD district. d. Prior to construction on any site zoned PUD, the developer shall seek plan approval pursuant to Section 35 -230 of this ordinance. In addition to the information specifically required by Section 35 -230, the developer shall submit such information as may be deemed necessary or convenient by the City to review the consistency of the proposed development with the approved development plan. 35 -48 t The plan submitted for approval pursuant to Section 35 -230 shall be in substantial compliance with the approved development plan. Substantial compliance shall mean that buildings, parking areas and road g , P g s are in essentially the same location as previously approved; the number of dwelling units, if any, has not increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; the floor area of nonresidential areas has not been increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; no building has been increased in the number of floors; open space has not been decreased or altered from its original design or use, and lot coverage of any individual building has not been increased or decreased by more than 10 percent. e. Prior to construction on any site zoned PUD, the developer shall execute a development agreement in a form satisfactory,to the City. f. Applicants may combine development plan approval with the plan approval required by Section 35 -230 by submitting all information required for both simultaneously. g. After approval of the development plan and the plan approval required by Section 35 -230, nothing shall be constructed on the site and no building permits shall be issued except in conformity with the approved plans. h. If within 12 months following approval by the City Council of the development plan, no building permits have been obtained or, if within 12 months after the issuance of building permits no construction has commenced on the area approved for the PUD district, the City • Council may initiate rezoning of the property. i. Any major amendment to the development plan may be approved by the City Council following the same notice and hearing procedures specified in this section. An amendment shall be considered major if it involves any change greater than that permitted by subdivision 5d of this section. Changes which are determined by the City Council to be minor may be made if approved by the Planning Commission after such notice and hearing as may be deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission. .35-49 City of Brooklyn Center Section 35 -208 REZONING EVALUATION POLICY AND REVIEW GUIDELINES. • 1. Purpose The City Council finds that effective maintenance of the comprehensive planning and land use classifications is enhanced through uniform and equitable evaluation of periodic proposed changes to this Zoning Ordinance; and for this purpose, by the adoption of Resolution No. 77 -167, the City Council has established a rezoning evaluation policy and review guidelines. 2. Policy It is the policy of the City that: A) Zoning classifications must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and, B) Rezoning proposals will not constitute "spot zoning ", defined as a zoning decision, which discriminates in favor of a particular landowner and does not relate to the Comprehensive Plan or to accepted planning principles. 3. Procedure Each rezoning proposal will be considered on its merits, measured against the above policy and against these guidelines, which may be weighed collectively or individually as deemed by the City. 4. Guidelines A. Is there a clear and public need or benefit? • B. Is the proposed zoning consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use classifications? C. Can all permitted uses in the proposed zoning district be contemplated for development of the subject property? D. Have there been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area since the subject property was zoned? E. In the case of City- initiated rezoning proposals, is there a broad public purpose evident? F. Will the subject property bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed zoning districts? G. Is the subject property generally unsuited for uses permitted'in the present zoning district, with respect to size, configuration, topography or location? H. Will the rezoning result in the expansion of a zoning district, warranted by: 1) Comprehensive planning; 2) The lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district; or, 3) The best interests of the community? I. Does the proposal demonstrate merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of an • individual parcel? Section 35 -208 Revised 3-01 12 - 31 -2801 4:21PM FROM M CRONIN 952 941 2645 P SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA 1901 57TH AVENUE NORTH CONSISTENCY WITH REZONING GUIDELINES A. Is there a clear need and public benefit? The approval of the rezoning wiIl allow us to not only serve our neighbors and the community better, but also more compatibly. The additional site area, its extension to the west, and importantly the increased depth from 57th Avenue, will allow us to better and more completely serve the neighbors and the community by increasing the variety and type of products in our store, and the number and design of our fueling points. We also believe the proposed plan will be more compatible with our immediate neighbors in three ways. First, the additional site area to our west will allow us to relocate the east ed-e of the store 100 ft , and the canopy for the fuel dispenser:, 6,01 "t, farther from Logan Avenue. Our activity on the site will be significantly relocated to the west, deeper into the commercial district along 57th, and farther from the residences on Logan. Second, the proposed plan provides a significant area adjacent to the side yard and garage of our neighboring home on Kogan, and the back yards of ow' two neighbors on Brookview Drive. These areas will be landscaped and fenced to optimize the effectiveness of this buffer area. Third, the new store will comply with current City performance standards, and will incorporate techniques to calm the design and operation of the store which will be recorded and enforced through the PUD process. B. Is the zoning consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use classifications? The commercial development and use on the south side of 57th Avenue has historically provided the transition between the commercial uses recognized in the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance alor both sides of 57th, and the surrounding residential districts. Allowing the new investment proposed in the development plan by Speedway SuperAmerica will not be an exception to the planned, permitted, historical and expected pattern of use along 57th Avenue, and will expand and reinforce the usefulness of this established commercial district for its neighbors and the City. C. Can all the permitted uses in the zoning district be contemplated for the subject property? The requested PUD designation will limit the potential use of this property to solely the use approved in the development plan, the proposed Speedway SuperAmerica convenience stare, while allowing the protection and buffering of abutting residential properties provided by the development and the detail of a residential transition zone. The development of this - none, and the westward relocation of the fuel dispensers and store in the activity zone, will substitute for the City wide zoning provision that would not permit the properted redevelopment abutting residential properties located on Logan and on Brookview Drive. It will also permit approval of specific features of the development plan that are custom to the conditions surrounding this site. D. Have there been substantial physical or zoning changes in the area since the subject property was zoned? Since the construction cif this store the City has adopted regulations that would not allow a new store adjacent to a residential use at this location. The requested zoning change to PUD is the most direcrt and careful approach to allow the benefits of the new store and the expanded site, and provide protection for the adjoining properties. E. Not applicable F. Will the subject property bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed zoning district? This PUD will allow the protection and buffering of abutting residential properties provided by the development and the detail of a residential transition zone, and the westward 2 — 1 — 2C�J01 4 : 21 PM FROM M CRON I N 9S2 941 2645 P. g Speedway SuperAmcrica 1907 Logan Avenue N. • relocation of the fuel dispensers and store in the activity zone, to substitute for the City wide zoning provision that would not permit the prposed redevelopment abutting residential properties located on Logan and on Bizxokview Drive. It will also permit approval of specific features of the development plan that are custom Lo the cx>nditions surrounding this site. These design elements include, but are not limited to: a. Establishment of a residential w' n i'tl transition zone with no exterior activity exte nding 75 U) 135 ft from the shared property line of the adjacent residences, buffered by a fence designed and located, and middle and overstory plantings specified, in conjunction with the affected adjacent homeowner. b. A lighting plan that restricts almost all ambient light of more than 1 ftc to the activity zone wsu re: that all fixtures will enclose each light source, and all lenses, including the lenses for the under canopy lighting will be flat and flush with the fixture or canopy deck and will parallel with the ground directing all light absolutely downward. c. A noise mitigation plan that includes relocation of activity on the site away from Loan Avenue and the use of fuel dispenser mounted, fueling point specific microphones and speakers for required communication with customers under the canopy. d. A circulation plan that relocates the driveways farther away from the intersection of 57th and Logan, provides easier on site movement, additional parking, and a designated and useful loading zone. e. A more than doubling of the area of the store, expanding the product mix and depth offered at the store. f. A plan for plantings along Logan that reinforces this residential edge and the intr(Auction of an architectural fence feature as well as an expanded yard to define and reinforce the 57th Avenue edge of the site g, An architectural metal fence with masonry piers in a 10 ft wide landscaped area alon`r 57th Avenue. G. Is the subject property generally unsuited for the uses permitted in the present zoning district, with respect to sir.,e, configuration, topography or location? The designation of the site as a YUD will allow the replacement of the present nonconforming store with an expanded store on an expanded site, which could not occur under the present coning provisions. See "A" above H. Will the rercmina result in the expansion of a zoning district, wananted by: 1) Comprchensivc planning; 2) Lack of developable land in the proposed coning district; or, 3) The best interests of the community'? Conditions 1 and 3. See A and B above 1. Does the proposal demonstrate merit beyond the interests of an owner or owner of an • individual parcel'? Each element of the development plan is designed to reduce the impact of the operations of our store on the neighborhood while providing a state of the art facility for the best possible shopping and s ervice experience for our customer. ATTACHMENT TO THE APPLICATION OF SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC FOR APPROVALS NECESSARY TO RECONSTRUCT AND EXPAND • THE PRESENT STORE LOCATED AT 1901 57TH AVENUE NORTH Speedway SuperAmerica has the opportunity to expand its present store site at 57th and Logan by the purchase of the adjacent home to our south and the adjacent vacant commercial property to our xvest. City approvals necessary to realize this opportunity are; rezoning the present site and the adjacent properties to "PUD ", approval of the development plan for that PUD, approval of the building plan to implement the approved development plan, and approval of the replating that will combine the three affected parcels into a single parcel. The proposed plan will increase the area of the present store site more than three times, from 14,221 sf to just over 51,000 sf. This larger site «7111 permit us to construct a state of the art store of 3800 sf, more than double the 1716 sf size of the present store. This will allow us to not only serve our neighbors and the community better, but also more compatibly. The additional site area, its extension to the west, and importantly the increased depth from 57th Avenue, will allow us to better and more completely serve the neighbors and the community by increasing the variety and type of products in our store, and the number and design of our fueling points. We also believe the proposed plan will be more compatible with our immediate neighbors in three ways. First, the additional site area to our west will allow us to relocate the east edge of the store 100 ft , and the canopy for the fuel dispensers 60 ft, farther from Logan Avenue. Our activity on the site NA7111 be significantly relocated to the N.vest, deeper into the commercial district along 57th, and farther from the residences on Logan. Second, the proposed plan provides a significant area adjacent to the side yard and garage of our neighboring home on Logan. and the back yards of our two neighbors on Brookview Drive. These areas will be landscaped and fenced to optimize the effectiveness of this buff - er area. Third, the new store will comply with current City performance standards, and will • incorporate techniques to calm the design and operation of the store which will be recorded and enforced through the PUD process. A. The Proposed Site and Building Plan The proposed site is organized into two zones. First, an "activity zone" extending 115 ft south from 57th Avenue where all the paving and activity on the site, fueling, circulation, parking and lighting, will occur. Within this activity zone, we have shifted the store and fuel dispensers as far to the tivest as possible. The east wall of the new store «111 be 135 ft from Logan, and the nearest fuel dispenser will be 85 ft from Logan. The remainder of the site will be a 75 to 85 ft deep "residential transition zone" where no outside activity will occur. All activity within this zone Nv'11 be within the masonry store building, which have no windows or public openings into this residential transition zone. The footprint of the new store building will be a 50 ft by 80 ft rectangle with chamfered corners at the front. The store will have a gross area of 3800 sf. The exterior will be two st of light colored masonry. A six course base of split faced block will support the remainder of the scored block exterior walls. The same materials will be use on all sides and for the walls of the trash enclosure. The sole windows and public entrance will be on the front of the building. The hip roof will have asphalt shingles. A well in the rear of the rear of the roof will contain the HVAC equipment. This well area will be enclosed on the front and sides by the roof structure and the rear by an installed screen. The new store, like the present store, will be open 24 hours each clay. Six pump dispenser islands, located under a canopy, will provide fueling for up to 12 vehicles. The canopy will have a 4 ft metal composite fascia which will be stripers, but not illuminated. • Parking will be provided in front of the store and extending along the building line towards Logan. The 21 spaces including the handicapped space, meet the required parking for the store. In addition, the 12 spaces at the pump islands will be the most used parking spaces on the site. In all, a total of 33 off street parking spaces will be provided. A loading area for delivery trucks is provided at the front of the trash enclosure. Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC 1901 57th Avenue North • Two driveways provide access to the site. One, from 57th Ave, at the western edge of the site. The second, from Loran, has relocated slightly to the south to provide additional stacking distance for vehicles to the semaphore at 57th Avenue, and from 57th Avenue, Lighting is provided for the site by four perimeter pole futures, one at each driveway, one at the edge of the parking area east of the store, and one above the under tanks on the «vest edge of the site, and by the lighting under the canopy above the fuel dispensers. The brightest part of the site will be under this canopy directly in front of the store. The light intensity drops to less than 1 ftc at the property lines, and wwith the exception of the area immediately at the base of the pole fixture illuminating the parking area, is below 1 ftc in all of the residential transition zone. All fixtures, whether freestanding or beneath the canopy, will have the light source completely enclosed and will have flat and flush lenses. Signage. is proposed on the front of the store building, the canopy, and on a single freestanding sign. A 25 ft 8 in tall, 100 sf, 6 ft wide by 15 ft 8 in high, internally illuminated freestanding sign is proposed at the corner of 57th and Logan. Three sib -ns are proposed on the store. First, a 3 ft by 2 ft 6.75 sf, illuminated SA logo above the entrance to the store. Second, an illuminated 5 ft by 8 ft, 40 sf, reader board on the buildin, wall to the right of the entrance. Third, a non illuminated ?2 ft 6 in by 2 ft 3 in tall, 53 sf, "SuperAmerica" at the top of the wall of the northwest chamfer. The total building signage is 100 sf, approximately half illuminated, and half not illuminated. We request that through the PUD process and in recognition of the less than permitted sign area and illuminated signage on the building, the development plan allow three illuminated signs on the canopy. The requested signage is for each short side, a 22 ft 6 in by 2 ft 4 in, 53 sf, "SuperAmerica ", and on the long side, facing 57th Ave., a 3 ft by 2 ft 6 in, 7.5 sf, SA logo. • The landscaping provided at the site will have two zones. The activity zone plan will address the issues on those edges of the site. A custom plan is being developed with the direct input of the three most affected neighbors for the residential transition zone, which, with the exception of the footprints of the building and the trash enclosure, is all landscape. The plans for both zones «°ill preserve and extend a landscaped edge north along Logan. All landscaped areas will be irrigated. In the activity zone, the primary planted area will be on the Logan Avenue edge on either side of the driveway. Here the sod area will be punctuated by the evergreen Viburnum in planting beds, providing understory interest, middlestory interest by plantings of Arbor Vitae, and overstory Ash and Nonway and Red Maple. A continuous area of Viburnum and Arbor Vitae along the parking area provides an edge for the activity zone and the introduction to the residential transition zone. On the west edge the plantings provide a transition to the fence extended from our rear property line. The major feature of the activity zone is the proposed architectural metal fence with masonry piers in a 10 ft wide landscaped area as an alternative to providing the required 15 ft vard. We believe the combination of the 10 ft of horizontal green space and the 3 ft tall decorative fence with masonry piers provides a pleasing and effective transition between the roadway to the site. We ask this alternative be adopted as part of the Development Plan. This alternative also permit`s extension of the residential transition zone an additional 5 ft towards 57th Ave. The plan for the transition zone has not been finalized with our neighbors. Our two neighbors on Brookview Drive have indicated an initial preference for removing the existing lilac hedge on our shared property line, and replacing it, along with the 6 ft tall stockade type and chain link fences installed by the neighbors, with neNv 8 ft tall cedar stockade 1 picket type fence (matching a style • recently installed by the neighbors between their homes) along our shared property line. and Speedway SuperAmerica would replace the remaining runs of stockade fence on the neighbor's shared property lines with a similar, but 6 ft tall, fence. For overstory trees, the preference at this time is spruce, planted certainly on our side, and perhaps on the neighbor's side of the fence. 2 Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC 1901 57th Avenue North • Along the west boundary of the transition zone we propose an 8 ft tall, board on board, Cedar, fence. At the time of application we have not been able to schedule a similarly detailed discussion with our immediate neighbor on Logan. B. Benefits of the Flexibility and Control of the Planned Unit Development Process at this Site. This PUD Nwill allow the protection and buffering of abutting residential properties provided by the development and the detail of a residential transition zone, and the westward relocation of the fuel dispensers and store in the activity zone, to substitute for the City wide zoning provision that would not permit the proposed redevelopment abutting residential properties located on Logan and on Brookviety Drive. It will also permit approval of specific features of the development plan that are custom to the conditions surrounding this site. The commercial development and use on the south side of 57th Avenue has historically provided the transition between the commercial uses recognized in the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance along both sides of 57th, and the surrounding residential districts. Allowing the new investment proposed in the development plan by Speedway SuperAmerica will not be an exception to the planned, pennitted, historical and expected pattern of use along 57th Avenue, and will expand and reinforce the usefulness of this established commercial district for its neighbors and the City. The PUD will permit and record the elements of the development plan that wlll assure the new Speedway SuperAmerica is both more compatible and more useful to the abutting and surrounding neighbors. These design elements include, but are not limited to: • a. Establishment of a residential transition zone wwith no exterior activity extending 75 to 85 ft from the shared property line of the adjacent residences, buffered by a fence designed and located, and middle and overstory plantings specified, in conjunction with the affected adjacent homeowner. b. A lighting plan that restricts almost all ambient light of more than 1 ftc to the activity zone, assures that all fixtures twill enclose each light source, and all lenses, including the lenses for the under canop lighting twill be flat and flush with the fixture or canopy deck and will parallel with the ground directing all light absolutely downward. c. A noise miti plan that includes relocation of activity on the site away from Logan Avenue and the use of fuel dispenser mounted, fueling point specific microphones and speakers for required communication with customers under the canopy. d. A circulation plan that relocates the driveways farther away from the intersection of 57th and Logan, provides easier on site movement, additional parking, and a designated and useful loading zone. e. A more than doubling of the area of the store, expanding the product mix and depth offered at the store. f. A plan for plantings along Logan that reinforces this residential edge and the introduction of an architectural fence feature as well as an expanded yard to define and reinforce the 57th Avenue edge of the site. • Each element is designed to reduce the impact of the operations of our store on the neighborhood while providing a state of the art facility for the best possible shopping and service experience for our customers. 3 Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC 1901 57th Avenue North • C. Neighborhood Involvement To test the neighbor's initial response to this plan and determine if we should continue pursuing the acquisitions of the properties and developing our plan we invited all of our adjacent neighbors, and members of the Neighborhood Advisory Board, to an evening meeting. The meeting was held in the Teacher's Lunch Room at Earle Brown Elementary School on December 11, 2001. We also asked any neighbor who would not be able attend to call us with any questions or comments about the meeting. That evening we had the opportunity to talk with approximately 15 neighbors, sitting down at tables, in small groups, about the history of the site, the present store, the proposed plan, and how issues with the present store could be resolved and special sensitivities can be addressed by a new development. Encouraged by our sense of the meeting that these affected neighbors would support a more compatible, more. useful, store we have continued to work on specific buffering details with our immediate neighbors, refined the plan, and have brought this application to the CI tv. t2:3i!oI I • 4 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 28, 2002 TO: Ron Warren, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Todd Howard, City Engineer C ;;r r� SUBJECT: SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject plans dated December 20, 2001, comments are as follows: I . Access to the site is less than ideal but is an improvement over the existing site. 57 Avenue North is a County State Aid roadway and the access will require Hennepin County approval. All work within Hennepin County right -of -way will also require a permit. Copies of the plans have been sent to the county for their review. 2. A rock construction entrance shall be included in the erosion control plan and only one entrance shall be utilized during construction. 3. The developer should be aware that soil contamination exists in the area. It is the • developer's responsibility to contact the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency before any excavation work is performed. 4. The utility plan shows an existing 1 -inch water service connecting to a irrigation line and a 1.5 -inch domestic service. The existing service should be abandoned at the main and a new service should be sized for fire protection, irrigation and domestic use. 5. The sanitary service from the Milovitz property shall be abandoned at the main and a new service installed along the property line. 6. The existing service from the vacant property shall be abandoned. 7. The existing water service shall be abandoned at the main. 8. The existing sanitary service is not shown on the plan. The proposed 6 -inch sanitary service is shown connecting to an existing service that is likely 4 -inch. The developer should verify a 4 -inch service has adequate capacity. 9. Connection charges for water and sanitary sewer are $1,500 and $3,000 respectively. 10. Final platting will be required prior to any work. 11. Final utility plans should be resubmitted. VILM- -v W - 1= 1 VI I I II III — I -- -------- T. - - - - - - - - - -- K 1, - - -- - -- - - - - 7 I willt.M., M N III La�. . % - - -- 'T - -- ;F;,. — 4 uq. � I � �. � a ,� u � j = _ - .... - .� .ro - - -- ��'� � ouaia. ' � i ..,.W,1 .�..,Y,n.'w.w�'.x�. .�.�... ®. ».x».x.,. a.x,xam. „x.,uw,,.. � �� oj 12 M Lotft Ck - 1 MI T I z .k c _ - - n l 0 0 57TH AVENUE NORTH ) 21- 1 M .1 ie :N11 i- 1 2 ,1 1 1 11. 1 NIJ I a I m W r. ..... PLOT PLAN ILZI STORE #4058 Mill —i. W I —W 1. 1 4 1 Q , — M i 1 2002 7413-1 0 J I � ,,.. �.N.wr�w n... �.w,nW, • W f um A w A �, 0 6w, .. -WALEIM r e8 0 ---0 ----------- 0 f MUM.% 0 577H AVENUE NORTH 1 NWTHMO CENIER ADDITIM I r w�ww .�n ni • s w.� �' - -- — r -wr fill, . _ PLOT Mn STORE #405 2002 7411-110 it i HYCPK roust i Uxl l' �11x IE f1ilxYr•KIm,1i• Ix PIPIN xm Lull wv(c MxINK m 1 rw r.wa a carvucxl. Pal :ea iili Is w x a P m rx,x w ars.r K I � wr., s.r NFr 'N f •1.( ly�l Pai Lml K s�P' xflal K R IK u�r.SUrNP uKl[ 1Kil 1. N" IK f W l[tll ° fxil[KU 10' Pml 'I1N 1xiN •1 vIK 51xh[i i [ I r[ " r w.f rM (� P,'Im Sx4.l IM 4la l 10 !S'F[L M, IL, i✓x 6SN rl [Pasi`w i ir P wri N y`, •.. lfs lRbla �(x1 ° HP 1K l4�K xi1Mlx xul[s. l r G• "• • � _J7L.YL � Nr [ � I w x rolt[r n(rF° Iw[°''[lS K1[P fP(x P"laxll ,m 11 i, rb.r ».P w:.f ,b.r IM(�liihll°u•IK P¢aC[Y P,IKUI. x KwIKP KrPIPf fn4l K xPPF — T N..'— — ,u ,b., Nx., wr. ,b I 11 . K(a.PU.fw I. i, I : ii ir i. sw :1Li — � � Sb 1 N•S � ,b.' - p,.S glp(O rxx °[IW111 k.[x Yrptlwl[li x4( IK KlLxl lr[ n, »' Nr.r rb.P Mr w., P \ I � w•— �� � u1vM0wEY�nsK(Kpllo o Sx4l YI t0 (<:f0PM . fP » �Nr r['K. N. M,.t ar.r W., • I/ - f Ira Hair[[, sul r[ uI I ' , N • � w.r w" a. ns..rrl ;wSrxuM . [mua La1R¢ xc.sKNS rrilwrw nPx. wt[S ,w w srn:r a 1r sou wales nu. ».• _ tliMl• � w � 4 » im nlunNa[ 1Pmla calm. r,Li[s is wulrca a mrzs. uPUu Yc� \.: ,u • �r • � [c.� � � � w.[ fu �a.r 1 ws s.scuarK0.sa11. '� w 'fl N''r L � [. K x w� casrPUria C o4q �, 4 � t — ,:' > »`�`• � w o ' w. 3 „' IM1,ll Kl Ixr(rixl. � W W .,. u r � K °IS1PiWK rasox PIP lw°luvf nxr f w(.1 P11raKY PI [ lnCi Ix ml K r,r(P Sx Y aw[P ,N] wH KK1,11 [Sr4lISMP. 3 � ,® w w ar(1IWIl - � N. ° rK,f mrl IPala a � °K.L.I1 K[f. Pf.wx(x[ KK1.[la x.1 w /'` I mu: 3 x[ KSPasIP11 Nr a 1K (arPKrm 10 IMa[ Test Yl 64/ 2 �xNr �.� ` � ,� �� '"� iou cim�a calxa KPSais ,K IxlPUlm ua wa1.IK°. N { `�` I • • •,• - Mfr °' iio niivnrT[uuranP 1NI��IRI II�IhII1' ����. r•x, � —� �� / r.: r� . i rm. fw(m 1a(nm r.b.,..r[ i� • ;�rrx.r f r([, _- Kej ` 0 � 0 57TH AVENUE NORTH waPC sutu( mri / [¢ ¢ xac C:: 1 i N0NTH6H0OP CENTER ADDITION Z TEMPORARY SILT FENCE DETAILS BALED STRAW EROSION CHECK DETAILS o w' CUT d FILL QUANTITIES EEUxo CUT = 300 cu. yd. x Z o Fill = 840 cu.yds , nunxc nllPP¢.KP ncrnra O o NET 540 cu.yds (FILL) a g NOTE: W CU 1 AND FILL QUANTITIES ON THIS PLAN ARE A �� ,�, r,vlK. �® 1 Hama ruxcss m1m mxunur F RESULT OF COMPARING EXISTING GRADE Tfl [u urs11M (a[aw x' J `ll PRDPOSED GRADE AND SHOULD DE USED ALONG WITH i b THE SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT AS REFERENCE. ACTUAL CUT AND FILL QU ANTI T IES c. u(xxux x x i ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. = ..v(Kxl <mxx uri EROSION PLAN _ «rm IK vlll[KAlla a ulsllw N ' STORE #4058 •j iiop :i sax s .rrxacxfs. wux.cf i,E a a"(ici ix:u ecifr i"o`� µ 2002 ?f 74112 / L xDIE1 1. [ mss a W4l x uu 1K141 4l wY[P14 1131[0 a awlw Ylsi, I I i [nl K 41ERW4 t: SaWI, . /Pit[ [D uxKR K[ loaf /p w.IK WI K[ Iux P 1K tux Wf Ya Mv[A[Y P K 4l P�1[°. t IWr[ xlix arFR kex[s[w,+ilv[ �LIrc4u�lx�r II[ R(orp ; x un p w tai InL [S p xln mSPleLO R xl K tar °alp — ( _.— ul [4a W(CIt 1EY I %IKO uSi K °�SR if l[lllbl{ � P m B 3. ;�IU1Wii W J' ( I vw 1 I 6 aKP'S urus[xrKlr[. Iwi4s �1i — Rr— u� - t/ � v aRW W[I[a/IPw [1[x /uf IO YK DISrRIWila lu[I. IwILLI I [ T � � � [. iwr41 v[FK a e0+ S 0(r(mla SiSr[M xw Kplp wxw[. I r-_- !!!! _ _ - II�,AUtlla`�,� rtP p+.IK •IS -[iI K ww1KI1K°'S 1 • `+ r[ ' / —� 1 1 l �� �. (. I wlw lwou ti xoi il. ai ( i u ' RNxrla —� t [ ate' -at- / �1 al_ ' — — _ — [w •,.n+. 1, ( ��•x ���.- t _ _ — — - ' ' tw /I ES IKCI� WN1 1p14 1 /MrolKr `I l 49u" cP15 D Pi(xuKLS nKLU01w BUSKW [xix( x y ^I [( —i —.l �K —l( '�• \ / I;;IKSl. M ITI. sKlVi w1[PI4s 10 1. 1. s,s1 C _� Y J x [auK1a suvn lm. cau4rp a A[srasutc ra wlcxlK k"� IK Illlw nii[x Sq Wp,(xa[(f rK sox W4x4rIM(R u iK • j � - _ �/ � �,� � �xP ���� [, �r 41PK0�tIK . LaIrKN( BS DI(r[Pai d I � } .D �?� Il.0 Iw141 31 x0x lIK P(A Rlut! a SIUUVD pxviK S(PI[3 •015. j I �'�. � / _ � •+ _ � \ f i - �D. Ix(t4[ t P rle( x4.14 Kxl LIKL w0 KL.i(D (al.Kxl. I - � // / \ 141 Kx [• SIKIL a4t SU[WKS K°tb[K SKllw /Pwu[, rIPIK. , �� w {5 W4 ( f1PI Pa xK IRa, 31K •t' II. S. •. B( pRiRlxt .SDS> I; Klq Sxp V[ YiU[Y ,`,� I t , I + I ®{ 1. "T ?41 i;,''�..`t & i;-- 'IX: 4i l 2 [..I [ I -� I I_� 1 I 1 1 I 1 3 , u ; wii ,a�lla s'wsrs.,ats« :aiF,.`• LU ►, d � � :yl l S px a(IxK( Illlw K Sww /(A SluoKO DwPlw K °I[3 2' I CL 'W.. 6f w. S I r. '"S� rn ! a/ I inlw li i niKxi i oo`u' "K iin =s. toKK,[ 3 a .R�Dx.I� .14(txra eK w. w „ 1•� I j /! t &. IH _� 4 � • I 1 uxiKU4ii.na cc mum Ranws P's .LPKUwulx Pnp � l y} - . rt[x.na, , . `, _ I h —® [ .z4 v[ Y lll or ' LK4 /w° (von. IKIm IKU rtwi.D twin a _ _ _�� �+. L- p• r M0µ4 ' K L. K. a0[ixRM 1111-1 1.1 /wY p'' l /� M �pCCY rY:L1L1" /• WIl0lw aulws fa!'" M KP ID Wl Il III IL01w. / �• , el r, , =� .ii /M S fONli(`O[P` CUB `uul(,pmsi'wrt[IYRwlx�cwgf(a `_. w I If 1 1.Iln I r o ;(i xt'!" rm T t.I. .TiI *— a 1x `wIUIK ilw"`alwlwuiws.°1 i. NIX t • - u —,—• ,—•—• P - -• —•— pOPIKS. [a1PKla 10 lmRelxxlL - •P .— .— .— .�— . —. -- _ d I 57TH AVENUE NG RUZ� — ,. _.. �., uPCK`; Ra Kw iu y6 w, lKt, ;�'I�rtt °,o wlolw f, o L..�..� „— 411 I a a s Ji i 1:• .[t tnlwlr .1rx ( ,4L ( vx * ox uii°ri ia+[frla 10 wumK. talwcl awn xlrx rK( sulw ro 4l P[r Pxocs. { Rlpi S�SSI(x [papa j j �� ��� • ; ' [D. j I ux4 mx•owEUR UK .nx KUx ra lPxumaslv[. �� 1111 -- / wxa1, Lxlnlw (WIIKY YKP r�.a4al PWP(R1, .(�x._ 1 I NDRiNRRDCIt CENIER ADOMON g a. 9 W � PIP14 t N111111ES lf"W " u2 x, zf IE € 11K l LWrt IxKPi nLWnpn un oIKA oPn1(p�mKKlas PIPING PLAN iio o-�lkii o:xxms wcK anon nolw 4E r � sx41 K fw[(rta / °1p ,o Iw14LLlla a Kx uluma I 4' STORE Y1059 i I[S Sx4l e[ IsKDiK(m Maai w rK ' wP4i(xnilv[. 202 7413 -3 SHAM ftwj G_w ". -to-G) o o ........... ± ` -- 4 1.11 lilt.. ------- &7125TOLZ�m (D . . ... .... L 7 1 .0 --------------- o 0 0 _7 J] il ------- 'R t ok fs (Ex M IN, 2, 7 0 B o1 0 577H AVENUE NORTH 4 to ISOMETRIC 9- SCRFFNING FFNCE ELEVATION " -4; m NWTW8R= CENTER ADDIUM SCREENING FENCE DETAIL DETAIL "B" 2-- TL .r.mroK�,Ir.lm a �� � � °� � � � � � ye . T DETAIL 'C' ELEVATION LANDSCAPE P .. .... ....... STORE #4056 DETAIL "C" W 1. SCREENING FENCE DETAIL DETAIL "A" DECORATIVE FENCE DETAI :t 2002 74134 tt • — -IL7 I —_ 8111E BAC[G1DW +Y RED'S i—BIUE 'A' I l l l l l l l l l t l l l A I I �• a I L " SUPFMAMERICA StR�tL AMERICf. : ©W , tarn ! ' .�..... .14.k3, "•'"' !f 'SA SUPERAAERICA' LOGO DETAIL cL 57TH AVENUE NORTH It . xrrxxxrYx Y ! >< 99.1 S0. FT. PRICE /L0. GOALPOST SIGN ELEVATION 'F' 19 .......,...... Y � G� 'r �.E SIGNAGE '� x� I catty tcssrc a.trttrttw I Dlmla I .rt. � - �YE :,L 1.1[[Wlr I Yy\YVxY i I W. .F�t;= �I�x vxlrE � � R } o.0 ° ��•..uJ / � ®E + � Y i 4d1 . CANOPY STRIPING DETAIL g 8UIl01NC ENTRANCE ELEVATION 'A' ...r r..a �� LL "° uuE: y.'• -o• :.r J .o. r. + +++• 19 READER 60ARD ELEVATION 'B' s ad Z rt03'Dlt[� I it i I ' IILw(f / rzwal�° . P cIwI I Y UPERAMERICA l ir _ PERAMERICA :i.. SIGNAGE PLAN ;: ��Itt��rt[ � •[c.[x °iawcr`i�'W °«"ri B1 a c.w : `u�. I !tc° °` T I r r n�sJ D rcctt rlu c ° ucl. na Di �uiiiw wirt uru.s n ..v •s�t....l .• ctntrs ..[ STORE #4058 CANOPY FASCIA FASCIA ELEVATION 'E' ha WaDiw un ulnr r.xl'u1p°m r . ctl !w<xu uw[ I CANOPY FASCIA ELEVATION 'D' BUILDING FASCIA ELEVATION 'C' 2002 xu[: r: • r o- uau Yt • 1' -D xa[: Y.' • r o- r , 74733 LRI- MS400 -IV I 40OW SMH Mounting Height= 16 feet. From Pole to Photometric Center= 2 feet. IES Candela File: C:- 5PLDIE5- L3707.IE5 00 00 0. oo v.v v.v v�v�vr ao o0 00 0 . 0 ov o.o 0o v.o v.o v.o v.o o.v ee o0 00 ov oo oo J .Q o.o Initial Lumens Par Lamp= 40000. Light Loss Factor ILLFI = 0.72 Nome, Poles This type = 4 o.o e. o.o o.a o.o o.e o.a o.o • CC- M5400 -FGL o>o�o a o.i e.o o.o e.e a.o e.e a.v o.v o.v a.v e.o v.v e.o a.o o.a o.o o.a o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o u.o o.0 40OW SMH Mounting Height= 16 feet. IES Candela Fi le: U IES 3938. [ES v v oo a ov vo ov e+ vo o, o+ v, o, v+ v+ v+ o, v+ ov I/ I 'o oe vo ov vv vv vv.vv val Initial Lumens per Lalrp= 4000D. Light Loss Factor t = 0. Nutrber Lumi no Tres thihis s = type 30 1 `00 9iiii Off( .o o.o .= oe c:; ;:; on o.x o., , •, +, ` ; _ o.. o., o.o o.o, o ao C� ILLUMINANCE IS IN HDRIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES. TARGET PLANE AT Z= 0 FEET. Summary w � tt POINTS 1052 AVERAGE 7.4 MAXIMUM 72.7 2 MIN MUM 0.0 "O o , e o.z a.• , o., ,., , , , , .MIS Ji,., s� MN , »N N., s, ]R Y o s, 6c ' siz ».mss # x i/�vc�,�P• ., .• o e o.o 2;:;;:; El o.ZoZ^ ^.ys �9.1��i1 E !-' vi. WL ._Lx1 �f o / 1]. v cE LTy o 57TH x AVENUE NORTH P 1 I NORTHER" CENTER ADDITION 9 RUII_DING IS TAKEN AS AN OBSTRUCTION 5NE IICHTING FDA: LIGHTING PLAN - SPEEOWAY SUPEflAMEfl ICA 11 l C STORE -4058 16R0I YN ITR. YNI a ' STORE #4058 ) WHITEWAY LIGHTING 2002 El �'... +, "1x.' 74134 • t • RECEIVED Marketing & Transportation Engineering e JAN 2 5 2002 MA"TMO. E�et Ur 40I1Lt1 (, R7Y` MARATHON ASHLAND Petroleum LLC 2060 Centre Pointe Blvd. January 25, 2002 suite 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Telephone 651/454-7776 Delwin & Donna Holm FAX 651/454 -8754 5639 Logan Avenue N. Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Holm, It is our understanding the enclosed plan revisions dated November 6, 2001 (Rev. January, 2002), are your preference for the improvements and design for the compatible redevelopment of the expanded SuperAmerica site. These plans includes, but are not limited to, these specific and custom features: 1. (Sale of Property) Marathon Ashland Petroleum will, as part of its replating of the SuperAmerica site, sever the southerly 8 ft of the present lot at 5649 Logan Ave, N. from our parcel, and add that 8 ft area to your parcel. For this addition to the dimension and area of your lot, you will pay Marathon Ashland Petroleum a sum of Seven Hundred and Fifty dollars • ($750.00) on the terms and conditions we have agreed to. 2. (Buffer fence) We will install a required buffer fence on the edges of the license area and along the rear line of the license area connecting to the buffer fence along the neighbor's lot line as shown on the plan. The buffer fence along the side yard will be 8 ft tall, made of cedar, and be of "board on board" design as shown on the elevation and isometric keynotes on the plan. This fence shall extend toward Logan Ave. approximately 7 ft beyond the front of your garage. The fence along the rear portion of the license area will not be a "board on board" design, but will match the decorative design of the required buffer fence installed along the property line we share with 1918 and 2000 Brookview Drive. 3. (Private fence) You will remove all the existing fencing between our properties and we will install a fence connecting the buffer fence and your garage at a point 3 ft behind the front edge of the garage, as shown on the plan. This private fence will be made of cedar, be the same design as the required buffer fence, and will be 6 ft tall. This fence will make the transition to the 8 ft tall buffer fence over the last 4 ft of its run, as shown in the construction note on the plan. We will also install a 6 ft tall, cedar, fence of the decorative design matching the design of the private fence installed in your neighbor's back yard along your rear lot line This fence will have two "good" sides, and will make the transition to the 8 ft tall buffer fence as shown in the construction note on the plan. It will be our responsibility to remove and dispose of the existing fence along along this lot line. • 4. (Our improvements in the license area) Within the area you wil purchase we will not disturb the existing drive east of the private fence, and will remove the driveway west of the private fence and replace it with a sodded area. The present shared driveway onto Logan Ave. will be narrowed to the boundary of the area you have purchased. • 5. (Cement slab) We will install a 6 ft by 20 ft, 4 in. deep, cement slab on your property adjacent to the garage, and extending from behind the private fence to approximately the end of the garage. 6. (Elm tree) We will remove the mature elm tree now located in the front yard of 5649 Logan Ave. N., and landscape the green area of that lot as shown on the plan. 7. (No deciduous trees) We will plant 6 ft to 8 ft spruce or pine trees as indicated between the corner of our store building and the corner of the license area, and will retain the existing crab tree in the front yard, and one of the two Norway Maples in the back yard, at 5649 Logan, but will plant no other deciduous trees adjacent to your property. 8. (Speakers) Microphones and speakers required and used to communicate with customers at the dispensers shall be individually mounted and addressable to each dispenser. The common speaker system type of equipment used at the present store will not be used at the new store. 9. (Access doors) The sole public access to and from the building shall be the single entrance at the front of the building. Any other doorway shall be only that exit required for emergency egress, and it shall be used only for that purpose. 10. ( Trash container) The trash container shall be located as on the plan, at the far side of the site. • 11. Buildin lighting) A switched wall mounted light will be installed at the emergency exit 11. ( Building g g) g g Y door at the rear of the store. This light will be on only when the door is in use. No other lighting will be provided on the sides and rear of the store building. If, due to unwanted activity in these areas, lighting is recommended, motion sensitive "wall- pack" lighting will be installed. If that does not discourage the activity, the lighting will become constant. If we have misunderstood or left out any of the elements of the plan that are important to you, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance in designing the most compatible relationship with your home. Sincerely, Brian LaFreniere Engineer Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC • cc: Mr. Ronald Warren City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 - 2199 RECEIVED �AN 2 5 2001 Marketing &Transportation Engineering e CITY OF BROOKLYN cFPrFR MARATHON ASHLAND Petroleum LLt 2060 Centre Pointe Blvd. Suite 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Telephone 651/454-7776 January 25, 2002 FAX 651/454-8754 Ms. Patricia Schutta 2000 Brookview Drive Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Dear Ms. Schutta, It is our understanding the enclosed plan revisions dated November 6, 2001 (Rev January 2002), are your preference for the improvements and design for the compatible redevelopment of the expanded SuperAmerica site. These plans include, but are not limited to, these specific and custom features: 1. (Buffer fence) We will install a required buffer fence on our shared property line. The buffer fence will be 8 ft tall, made of cedar, and be of the decorative design matching other fencing you have installed on your property, and as shown on the elevation and isometric keynotes on the o plan. As part of the construction of this buffer fence we will remove and dispose of the present wood fence on your property along our shared property line, and the lilac hedge on our shared property line. 2. (Private fence) We will remove and dispose of the existing wood stockade type fence on the property line you share with Mr. Mozey, and along the property line you share with 2006 Brookview Drive between our shared property line and your garage. We will replace these private fences with fences that are 6 ft tall, made of cedar, and of the decorative design matching the buffer fence and other fence you and Mr. Mozey have installed joining your homes, and as shown on the elevation and isometric keynotes on the plan. These fences will have two "good" sides, and will make the transition to the 8 ft tall buffer fence over the last 4 ft of their run, as shown on the construction note on the plan. 3. (Landscaping) We will plant spruce trees in the area to the rear of our store building to reinforce the backdrop of evergreens now provided by the plantings in your and your neighbor's yards. 4. (Speakers) Microphones and speakers required and used to communicate with customers at the dispensers shall be individually mounted and addressable to each dispenser. The common speaker system type of equipment used at the present store will not be used at the new store. 5. (Access doors) The sole public access to and from the building shall be the single entrance at • the front of the building. Any other doorways shall be only those required emergency egress and shall be only used for that purpose. • 6. (Building lighting) A switched wall mounted light will be installed at the emergency exit door at the rear of the store. This light will be on only when the door is in use. No other lighting will be provided on the sides and rear of the store building. If, due to unwanted activity in these areas, lighting is recommended, motion sensitive "wall- pack" lighting will be installed. If that does not discourage the activity, the lighting will become constant. If we have misunderstood or left out any of the elements of the plan that are important to you, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance in designing the most compatible buffer for your home. Sincerel Brian LaFreniere Engineer Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC cc: Mr. Ronald Warren City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 - 2199 • RECEIVEr-I MAR JAN 2 5 2002 Marketing &Transportation Engineering ,�� d • :IT1' � � PiRP -rwi CjTF `�' ` r MARATHON ASHLAND Petroleum LLC 2060 Centre Pointe Blvd. Suite 1 January 25, 2002 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Telephone 651 /454-7776 FAX 6511454 -8754 Mr. Steve Mozey 1918 Brookview Drive Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Mozey, It is our understanding the enclosed plan revisions dated November 6, 2001 (Rev. January 2002), are your preference for the improvements and design for the compatible redevelopment of the expanded SuperAmerica site. These plans include, but are not limited to, these specific and custom features: 1. (Buffer fence) We will install a required buffer fence on our shared property line. The buffer fence will be 8 ft tall, made of cedar, and be of the decorative design matching other fencing you have installed on your property, and as shown on the elevation and isometric keynotes on the • plan. As part of the construction of this buffer fence we will remove and dispose of the present chain link fence on your property along our shared property line, and any part of the lilac hedge on our shared property line. 2. (Private fence) We will remove the existing wood stockade type fence on the property lines you share with Ms. Schutta, and replace it with a fence that is 6 ft tall, made of cedar, and of the decorative design matching the buffer fence and the other fence you and Ms. Schutta have installed joining your homes, and as shown on the elevation and isometric keynotes on the plan. We will also install a similar fence along your shared property line with the Holms. These fences will have two "good" sides, and will make the transition to the 8 ft tall buffer fence over the last 4 ft of their run, as shown on the construction note on the plan. 3. (Landscaping) We will plant spruce trees in the area to the rear of our store building to reinforce the backdrop of evergreens now provided by the plantings in your and your neighbor's yards. We will also plant one 6 to 8 ft tall spruce tree in your backyard at the location staked by you to provide a transition to our site and reinforce our plantings. 4. (Speakers) Microphones and speakers required and used to communicate with customers at the dispensers shall be individually mounted and addressable to each dispenser. The common speaker system type of equipment used at the present store will not be used at the new store. 5. (Access doors) The sole public access to and from the building shall be the single entrance at the front of the building. Any other doorways shall be only those required emergency egress and shall be only used for that purpose. 6. (Building lighting) A switched wall mounted light will be installed at the emergency exit door at the rear of the store. This light will be on only when the door is in use. No other lighting will be provided on the sides and rear of the store building. If, due to unwanted activity in these areas, lighting is recommended, motion sensitive "wall- pack" lighting will be installed. If that does not discourage the activity, the lighting will become constant. If we have misunderstood or left out any of the elements of the plan that are important to you, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance in designing the most compatible buffer for your home. Sincerely Brian LaFreniere Engineer Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC • cc: Mr. Ronald Warren City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 - 2199 • Member Graydon Boeck introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2002-01 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PL - PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION N .2002 001 SUBMITTED UB MITTED BY SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA, LLC. WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2002 -001 submitted by Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC proposes rezoning from C -2 (Commerce) and R -1 (One Family Residence) to PUD /C -2 of a 1.139 acre site located at the southwest quadrant of 57th Avenue North and Logan Avenue North; and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends the rezoning of the above mentioned property and development plan approval for a 3,969 sq. ft. convenience store /gas station with six fuel dispensers and a canopy area on the above mentioned site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on January 31, 2002, at the Brooklyn Center West Fire Station when a staff report and public testimony regarding the rezoning and development plan were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Planned Unit Development request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating rezoning contained in s Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the Planned Unit Development ordinance contained in Section 35 -355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2002 -001 submitted by Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC be approved in light of the following considerations: 1. The Planned Unit Development is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Planned Unit Development proposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. 3. The utilization of the property as proposed under the Planned Unit Development rezoning is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with city ordinance standards except for allowing a gasoline station to abut R -1 zoned property; a building encroachment into the 35 ft. buffer area where the property abuts with 5639 Logan Avenue North; and a less thanl5 ft. greenstrip along the 57th Avenue North right of way line. These modifications from the C -2 standards are • justified on the basis of the development being an appropriate redevelopment of this area and that they are offset or mitigated by various factors contained in the approved development plan. 4. The Planned Unit Development proposal is considered consistent with the a recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. 5. The Planned Unit Development proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this redevelopment can be considered an asset to the community. 6. In light of the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating rezonings as contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and that the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2002 -001 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be rt determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits to assure completion of all site improvements. 4. B -612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all driving and parking areas. 5. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 6. The building shall be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 7. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery, which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. Specifically, identification signs shall not be allowed on the canopy, nor shall the faces of the canopy be internally or externally lit. Canopy signs may only be allowed in lieu of other permitted freestanding signs. 9. The applicant shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. is 10. The property owner shall enter into an easement and agreement for maintenance and inspection of utility and storm drainage systems prior to the issuance of permits. 11. All work performed and materials use for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center standard specifications and details. 12. The applicant shall provide appropriate erosion control during construction as approved by the City's Engineering Department. 13. No building permit will be issued for construction of the proposed building until the plat comprehended under Planning Commission Application No. 2002 -002 has been modified, given final approval by the City Council and filed with Hennepin County. 14. The applicant shall enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. Said agreement shall be filed with the title to the property and shall acknowledge the specific modifications to the C -2 underlying zoning district as well as other conditions of approval. The agreement shall further assure compliance with the development plans submitted with this application. 15. Approval of the application acknowledges that the south wall of the building shall contain only one emergency exit with lighting consistent with that shown on the development plan. 16. All lighting fixtures, whether freestanding or beneath the canopy, will have the light source completely enclosed and will have flat and flush lenses. 17. The applicant shall use fuel dispenser mounted fueling point specific microphones and speakers for required communications with customers at the pump island areas. 18. No car wash facilities are comprehended as part of this development plan nor will such facilities be allowed in the future. 19. The development plan shall be modified prior to the issuance of building permits in the following manner: a. to include the 8' X 130' conveyance of land to the property at 5639 Logan Avenue North. b. To show the extension of sidewalk between the building and existing sidewalk on Logan Avenue North. ,n Date Chair AT ST. S ecretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member John Whitehead and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Grady ® Boeck, Stephen Erdmann, Rex Newman, Sean Rahn, Dianne Reem, Tim Willson, h ` : and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. I Member introduced the following resolution and moved its • adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2002 -002 SUBMITTED BY SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA, LLC WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2002 -001 submitted by Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC proposes rezoning from C -2 (Commerce) and R -1 (One Family Residence) to PUD /C -2 of a 1.139 acre site located at the southwest quadrant of 57th Avenue North and Logan Avenue North; and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends the rezoning of the above mentioned property and development plan approval for a 3,969 sq. ft. convenience store /gas station with six fuel dispensers and a canopy area on the above mentioned site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on January 31, 2002, at the Brooklyn Center West Fire Station when a staff report and public testimony regarding the rezoning and development plan were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Application No. • 2002 -001 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2002 -01 on January 31, 2002; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered Application No. 2002 -001 at its February 11, 2002 meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Planned Unit Development request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating rezoning contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the Planned Unit Development ordinance contained in Section 35 -355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Planning Commission's recommendation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Application No. 2002 -001 submitted by Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC be approved in light of the following considerations: 1. The Planned Unit Development is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Planned Unit Development proposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. • RESOLUTION NO. • 3. The utilization of the property as proposed under the Planned Unit Development rezoning is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with city ordinance standards except for allowing a gasoline station to abut R -1 zoned property; a building encroachment into the 35 ft. buffer area where the property abuts with 5639 Logan Avenue North; and a less than 15 ft. greenstrip along the 57th Avenue North right of way line. These modifications from the C -2 standards are justified on the basis of the development being an appropriate redevelopment of this area and that they are offset or mitigated by various factors contained in the approved development plan. 4. The Planned Unit Development proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. 5. The Planned Unit Development proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this redevelopment can be considered an asset to the community. 6. In light of the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating rezonings as contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and that the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Application No. 2002 -001 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits to assure completion of all site improvements. 4. B -612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all driving and parking areas. 5. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 6. The building shall be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. RESOLUTION NO. • 7. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery, which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. Specifically, identification signs shall not be allowed on the canopy, nor shall the faces of the canopy be internally or externally lit. Canopy signs may only be allowed in lieu of other permitted freestanding signs. 9. The applicant shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. 10. The property owner shall enter into an easement and agreement for maintenance and inspection of utility and storm drainage systems prior to the issuance of permits. 11. All work performed and materials use for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center standard specifications and details. 12. The applicant shall provide appropriate erosion control during construction as approved by the City's Engineering Department. • 13. No building permit will be issued for construction of the proposed building until the plat comprehended under Planning Commission Application No. 2002 -002 has been modified, given final approval by the City Council and filed with Hennepin County. 14. The applicant shall enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. Said agreement shall be filed with the title to the property and shall acknowledge the specific modifications to the C -2 underlying zoning district as well as other conditions of approval. The agreement shall further assure compliance with the development plans submitted with this application. 15. Approval of the application acknowledges that the south wall of the building shall contain only one emergency exit with lighting consistent with that shown on the development plan. 16. All lighting fixtures, whether freestanding or beneath the canopy, will have the light source completely enclosed and will have flat and flush lenses. 17. The applicant shall use fuel dispenser mounted fueling point specific microphones and speakers for required communications with customers at the pump island areas. 18. No car wash facilities are comprehended as part of this development plan nor will • such facilities be allowed in the future. RESOLUTION NO. 19. The development plan shall be modified prior to the issuance of building permits in the following manner: a. to include the 8' X 130' conveyance of land to the property at 5639 Logan Avenue North. b. to show the extension of sidewalk between the building and existing sidewalk on Logan Avenue North. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 11th day of March, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at the West Fire Station, 6250 Brooklyn Boulevard, to consider • an Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 the City Ordinances regarding the zoning classification of certain land. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the City Clerk at 763 -569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LAND (SW CORNER OF 57TH AND LOGAN AVENUES NORTH) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended in the following manner: Section 35 -1190. COMMERCE DISTRICT (C2). The following properties are hereby established as being within the (C2) Commerce District zoning classification: Tracts B and C, and B Registered Land Survey No. 1114. That , t Af the nerth 110 f t o f L 35 A dit Sub-div No. 218 l y i ng oast of the • Lot 1, Block 1, SuperAmerica 5th Addition. Section 35 -1240. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUD). The following properties are hereby established as being within a (PUD) Planned Unit Development zoning classification: 4. The following properties are designated as PUD /C2 (Planned Unit Development/Commerce): Lot 2, Block 1, SuperAmerica 5th Addition Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of , 2002. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date Strikeouts indicate matter after to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.) • i S City Council Agenda Item No. 9b • i • MEMO To: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager From: Ronald A. Warren, Planning and Zoning Sp ialist j _� Subject: City Council Consideration Item - Planning Commission Application No. 2002- 002 Date: February 6, 2002 On the February 11, 2002 City Council Agenda is Planning Commission Application No. 2002 - 002 submitted by Marathon Ashland Petroleum requesting Preliminary Plat approval to divide and combine three parcels of land totaling 79,496 sq. ft. (1.825 Acres) into two lots at the Southwest corner of 57th and Logan Avenues North Attached for your review are copies of the Planning Commission Information Sheet for Plaiming Commission Application No. 2002 -002 and also an area map showing the location of the property under consideration, the Planning Commission minutes relating to the Commission's S consideration of this matter and other supporting documents. This matter was considered by the Planning Commission at their January 31, 2002 meeting and was recommended for approval with the inclusion of the lot at 5639 Logan on the final plat. It is recommended that the City Council, following consideration of this matter, approve the application subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. • Application Filed on 1 -10 -02 • City Council Action Should Be Taken By 3 -11 -02 (60 Days) Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 2002 -002 Applicant: Marathon Ashland Petroleum Location: Southwest Corner of 57th and Logan Avenues North Request: Preliminary Plat The applicant, Ryan LaFreniere, on behalf of Marathon Ashland Petroleum, is seeking preliminary plat approval to divide and combine three parcels of land located at the southwest corner of 57th and Logan Avenues North into two lots. One of the lots would be for the redeveloped SuperAmerica station comprehended under the Planning Commission Application No. 2002 -001. The properties are bounded on the north by 57th Avenue; the east by Logan Avenue; the south by single family residential homes facing Logan and Brookview Drive; and vacant commercial property on the west. As mentioned, the property is currently made up of three lots. The lot at 1915 57th Avenue North is approximately 55,000 sq. ft. in area, is the site of the Milavetz law firm and contains a 3,567 sq. ft. building. The lot at 1901 57th Avenue North is 14,300 sq. ft. in area, is the current • SuperAmerica site and contains an approximate 1,836 sq. ft. building. These two lots are currently zoned C -2 (Commerce). The third lot is at 5649 Logan Avenue North, is 9,750 sq. ft. in area and contains a single family home and garage owned by David and Beverly Holmes. This lot is currently zoned R -1 (One Family Residence). Agreement has been reached between the various property owners to create through the platting process, two lots out of this combined 79,496 sq. ft. (1.825 acre) area. The plat is to be known as SuperAmerica 5th Addition. The proposed Lot 1 would be 29,852 sq. ft. (.686 acres) and contain the Milavetz law firm building. The proposed Lot 2 would be 49,606 sq. ft. (1.139 acres) and would be the site for the SuperAmerica redevelopment. It is the proposed Lot 2 that is being rezoned to PUD /C -2 under companion Application No. 2002 -001. The Milavetz site has a 19 stall parking lot in addition to the 3,567 sq. ft. building. This parking lot meets the one space for every 200 sq. ft. of gross floor area parking requirement for an office building. It should be pointed out that the ability to utilize this building for retail uses, which are allowed in the C -2 zoning district, is gone with this platting. The proposed SuperAmerica site would exceed the minimum lot size requirement for a gasoline service station contained in Section 35 -414 of the zoning ordinance. That section requires a minimum 20,000 sq. ft. lot for a gasoline service station. Representatives of SuperAmerica have had discussions with neighboring property owners regarding concerns they have about the proposed SuperAmerica redevelopment. Screening • 1 -31 -02 Page 1 proposals have apparently been resolved. The owners of the property at 5639 Logan Avenue North (Delwin and Donna Holm) have an attached single car garage located approximately 6 1/2 to 7 ft. from their north property line and they also share a driveway with 5649 Logan, which is being incorporated with the proposed SuperAmerica lot. Their negotiations with SuperAmerica have resulted in an agreement to convey 8 ft. along the southerly property line of 5649 Logan Avenue to the Holms. This will allow them to, at some point in the future, expand their single car garage or build a new garage on that side of the lot. It will also allow a continuation of a portion of the shared asphalt driveway and curb cut along Logan. The Holms' lot will also have to be included in this plat in order to convey the 8 ft. Survey work and data collection will be undertaken immediately. Consideration of this modification was included in the report and the recommendations made for the PUD Application No. 2002 -001. We do not believe it is necessary to resubmit the preliminary plat but recommend that the necessary changes be made and the necessary survey data be provided with the final plat. The plat would then contain three lots rather than two and the Holm property would be 83 ft. by 130 ft. (10,790 sq. ft.) The City Engineer is reviewing the preliminary plat and will be making comments related to it for the Commission's review. The plat is less than five acres in area and is not subject to review by the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission. A public hearing has been scheduled for this preliminary plat and notice of the Planning Commission's consideration has been published in the Brooklyn Center Sun/Post. RECOMMENDATION • This preliminary plat is dependent upon the approval of the Planned Unit Development under Plam7ing Commission Application No. 2002 -001. If that application is not approved, this preliminary plat should also not be approved. All in all, we believe this preliminary plat is in order and approval is recommended subject to at least the following conditions: 1. Final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The final lat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. P J p p Y 3. Approval of this preliminary plat is contingent upon approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2002 -001. 4. The plat shall be modified to include the lot at 5639 Logan Avenue North and the proposed 8 ft. conveyance to be attached to that lot. Survey data shall be submitted to the City Engineer and the final plat shall include this lot. 5. Building permits for construction of the SuperAmerica building comprehended under Planning Commission Application No. 2002 -001 shall not be issued until the final plat has been approved by the City Council and filed with Hennepin County. • 1 -31 -02 Page 2 ilt►r /111 l��I �� �` ' Mrs • • 1111111 1111111 11111 r \ i 11�11� IIIE! !1 1111111 �11�1 11 11111 . :11111: 111 111 . 11 �111�i11%1�1 �• ��� 111 - ' - �111� -• 111 ., . � X111111111111 pa ME � 1 • oil • �! 111 1111 111111 1 1 1111 - . X11 /11 11 � +� X1111 1111 /� 111 1111 11111 111111 111 ��� I 11 ' ' • • 11111 II�i111 . 1111 • • • � 11 • 111 �1 /1111 111111 �_ 11111111 111 111 111111.► 1 �. 111 111 Jim - -'-'� �� 1 11111 •- � i11 1 ll �111�11 :a 'N►, .�LrKr�z ���r� >,KyS^A7.- �:i3,r ?3� �'egY�,°"y53 �"$°ufaa�xr +v�� t�s/ "mac spa i c4r «,, e • • I — PREL/MNARY PLAT OF SUPEIRAMEH /CA 5THADDMON wPnox ! Pa°P aTr nes ° �. wale:e seedY,rm nle, x«„ »F e«mt c «rr<m< e I +) « S77Ji 1 . A.(IEl1R9E r7N w m. .r _ YFnnele. ,<ep In< [eat i:a e<1 �n A = , » , t e,vx,µtt _ a S '24 'E •: 4a9. /J R � in)s x s Tha Sevin ]S 00 1 .1 a . . t .1 Ill Js A a sven,+.lm xv, ]le. x wF - _ , e� • ' T � • m {7_ . � r r• • I„_. : �: n ' • �a[ C Sw e:.t Oue tw9 s °i ion l 2 n ie .np 1 e11nn Cv,l I/e °I er Ina -1-1 Wml« el !ne 2. .r°• '"` , yt •V f �'`�('^ 4 - - _ , \.. - -- _ -- w 1„ r x A,. •IP �„ ( I: I ai,.•r[w«.__eP \_ -- /ter, y , p „, .. « r t -5 .,. °..,p4 ,. t7 .. d «LOT 1 _ / (_ \ „•$a' »¢ �°7n°°A : "q1 ':ef'e i - \ \ c L O — - - - - - 1� c I L-01. ma er p eM m 411 a \ r.\ . ».\ . ». . M ... M'I _ '�x sae: ° me l wgr ° e r vne ' u �mw , - I.l v «n ti -1 i cT" \ / E •_ I� v 1 \ I �.._ e % je �p I �e:I.� «cc.0 W � Dt ).s. -�n:1 p I.. °n 1.1 e4mere1M1» ��L.::, , . - - � �' - - - - - j ' I .-I•I 1 .,, \ ..., _, 1 .�, :,� W' _ s��� , S,�P.�'�a`' r N `' - ,fl q) ° e , < °wl,m .r <e!1 °I avc .e ✓ J Pas ' n eDPx 4 11 . ~I D mmt 3001 .s �. p n. le moll «. e1-1 ae. �tPe::I n 1} » 11 L.n a a� O C� w -1 Omn�fl°e T a In,wen» UV C < °mm Y and 1. 70 151 1 000, ° B, e°I d P e ery w_ t r s e « o e --11 e.t.a 0<I.ew 21. 1 918, er •:f � /,= x,� _ �, °"`I ' 1 ^ E 1.t vi.:l � N : I L s0. PSee. ', oe< iglolee ••e• I 1 1 '„ A �I O wI •' TM�Z-., ma aelneA Flermetim v, vr� l e, Ine I-., D<Pwtmml el Me a v el Bra°NM I 1 �.�,m a" .• ]K: 1, < ne �,l P.� «t ,md (eemmwn) All lea as ec e + C -] (Comm «ce). an - "' - ti -c oxrxt -R<`. r.., -- - - _ / 1... ..�, -"" / .r. __ , \, P x • .,., � I I �� ABviceFw,9.mmtld) '°` ,"w .1. »r -]5 r, ...• •,•{ia 1 s, o. m,.�� � , / '// w.T„�g• • �^ 4 '3'10 • en.» e % "� • , t K • '. 4 Aev .O IM It 3). SS ,e.I IA - 1) A iew°,dsi'rIt n °`o. 1. n A Y n : ` -�, ,' ,w 1 \ "'• _— -_ NB 1�I'21'W r /JI. /O'e let ] o- 60ee me een 130 a xe C eF 1 e)sw,., eF °t q e,l m , °w n I,- L -- �`�'NB9't 'II •W'.'P)151 •'r' - _•_-- '.:.��T ��Nx � \'S' . /S.Oa � sw ee..,e. .«.v. xnru me T am Awwe (nw. aiw� yC n a� «e r1, ) ./ • {.I: jyyAT` \ l r,v,nry u<`' I I 1.) Tl Oi- n, °� fe gym e1 .mu< xe.rn A .< e x 1n 9 AD Dmet.. <° e14m« aP \�74 J Dme1n ZONE R -/ (9NOLE FAMILY HES/0£N77AL) .. n+tn twn Yw Dmmn re< GASP Dm°lea q» p // VICINITY MAP Dw Dmnt<. qx^ eae ,M Dmete, M1o:d • a•• "" • ' e "" „la 1 Su Dme1„ ,Mm1 ew11m • ' n y ' ° ' ree (eai) . -„y sA!.E S, k NIrnM P. �euq 11 , ° 1°n of Dm°lea ahvet°' a Fwrl N � µ. lei,) a » -AZd Mlewlx ry Uet In • N Ine °I< m .-It Omelee c e e ne M D rtl Dwwlaa m�annd.elf _- 1913 Slln An. N. Ike �m Br°eY,n Cml «, Yn SS,b wile fl w a„u, Cx aEG Dmvlea ewrneea Necixc IFa 'N rre 100 ..,. �" , Sp.d.e, Swwandce LLC -.d 111. OeY vl een »ry,P 2- w1y le PP �mel:: Oe. o.d -11-1 p r✓' w -f— C29 M°N eo-M pp, Dm°t n p me egnt ptle ID ,FdeY OnSM;e,O Re 9.MOE lJa1D 4gvExfuD, lit. Dmet .. pbe {{ FF FF B SN 3 Omeln a »Itary ae,« 4 D m l �� ,�• (np ,yi, -aom 5410 L, V k e 11e JMn x. Bemaa. P.�A ubn Aeq, a Ie,Se .� S TA S D al<„urve ^.d a1 °tbpnp � � � —C- t. r,M,lo•e+w ,Am rur< ueralnm � «e"u iC O me,»,elronr nee, el ) * APR�CAUT • n IS,XI ro 91 �« 30 0 2. . 4' Dmeln de, P Cmlren , P°Fte eu,.wa l. WV Omeln 4mae xel n1 M SDALL » -T 1 el « "° P °,e�,i ) 13D 1>0 /Sande Lnnd Surveying, LLC. B m [e j SPCg Dmetn �d >de 91u. SM+ F.. reAt••• e„w,... ,S,�ee1 ,.ss e� " .,,. I I e, -x, -x. .,,i,p ,,,w w,,. :„ aP><,Pp,pw n,•me - - - I L ___J MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION JANUARY 31, 2002 CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Willson at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Tim Willson, Commissioners Graydon Boeck, Stephen Erdmann, Rex Newman, Sean Rahn, Dianne Reem, and John Whitehead were present. Also present were Secretary to the Planning Commission/Planning and Zoning Specialist Ronald Warren, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — November 14, 2001 There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Whitehead, to approve the minutes of the November 14, 2001 meeting as submitted. The motion passed. Commissioners Erdmann and Reem abstained as they were not at that meeting. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion Commissioner Newman, seconded by Commissioner Boeck, to adjourn the 2001 Plamling Commission. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 7:36 • p.m. ADMINISTER OATH OF OFFICE Mr. Warren Administered the Oath of Office to Stephen Erdmann, Rex Newman, and John Whitehead. CALL TO ORDER: 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION The 2002 Plannin g Y p Commission was called to order b Chair Willson at 7:38 .m. ROLL CALL 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION Chair Tim Willson, Commissioners Grady Boeck, Stephen Erdmann, Rex Newman, Sean Rahn, Dianne Reem and John Whitehead. Also present were Secretary to the Planning Commission/Planning and Zoning Specialist Ronald Warren, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. ELECTION OF 2002 CHAIR Chair Willson opened the floor for nominations. Commissioner Reem nominated Commissioner Tim Willson as Chair of the 2002 Planning Commission. Chair Willson asked for further nominations three times. Hearing none, he asked for a motion to close the nominations. • There was a motion by Commissioner Whitehead, seconded by Commissioner Newman, to close the nominations for Chair of the 2002 Planning Commission. The motion passed unanimously. 01 -31 -02 Page 1 There was as a motion by Commissioner Whitehead, seconded by Commissioner Newman to elect Commissioner Willson to the position of Chair of the 2002 Planning Commission. The motion passed unanimously. • ELECTION OF 2002 CHAIR PRO TEM Chair Willson opened for the floor for nominations. Commissioner Reem nominated Commissioner Boeck as Chair Pro Tem of the 2002 Planning Commission. Chair Willson asked for further nominations three times. Hearing none, he asked for a motion to close the nominations. There was a motion by Commissioner Newman, seconded by Commissioner Reem, to close the nominations for Chair Pro Tem of the 2002 Planning Commission. The motion passed unanimously. There was a motion by Commissioner Newman, seconded by Commissioner Reem, to elect Commissioner Boeck to the position of Chair Pro Tem of the 2002 Planning Commissioner. The motion passed unanimously. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION Chair Willson explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. ® APPLICATION NO. 2002 -001 (SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA, LLC) AND 2002 -002 (MARATHON ASHLAND PETROLEUM) Chair Willson introduced Application No. 2002 -001, a request from Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC, seeking Rezoning and Site and Building Plan approval through the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process for the redevelopment of the SuperAinerica convenience store /gas station at the southwest corner of 57th and Logan Avenues North and Application No. 2002 -002, a request from Marathon Ashland Petroleum, seeking preliminary plat approval to divide and combine the three effected parcels of land. Mr. Warren presented the staff report using overhead transparencies to describe the location of the property and the proposal. The property in question is zoned C -2 (Commerce) and R -1 (One Family Residence) and includes the existing SuperAmerica site (1901 57th Avenue North), a portion of the Milavetz law firm property (1915 57th Avenue North) and the residential property at 5649 Logan Avenue North. The property is bounded on the north by 57th Avenue North with commercially zoned property on the opposite side of the street; on the east by Logan Avenue North with R -1 zoned property on the opposite side of the street; on the south by single family homes located on R -1 zoned property; and on the west by C -2 (Commercial) zoned property. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet for Application No. 2002 -001 attached.) Mr. Warren presented the second staff report for companion Application No. 2002 -002 which consists of a preliminary plat that will divide and combine the effected parcels to create a new lot for the SuperAmerica proposal. The property at 5639 Logan Avenue (owned by Delwin and Donna Holm) will also be included in the plat in order to convey 8 ft. along the southerly property line of 5649 Logan Avenue to the Holms. The final plat would contain three lots rather 01 -31 -02 Page 2 than two and the Holm property would be 83 ft. by 130 ft. (10,790 sq. ft.). (See Planning Commission Information Sheet for Application No. 2002 -002 attached.) Mr. Warren described the applicant's proposal to demolish the existing SuperAmerica convenience store /gasoline station/canopy and the house and garage at 5649 Logan Avenue North to allow them to build a new, approximately 3,900 sq. ft. convenience store with six new pumping dispensers and a new canopy. Commissioner Boeck asked if the Milavetz site would conform to zoning requirements with the loss of property being purchased by SuperAmerica. Mr. Warren responded that the Milavetz site would still meet minimum lot and parking requirements as a service /office use but not for potential retail uses, which are otherwise allowed in a C -2 zone. Commissioner Boeck also asked about what compromises a "development plan ". Mr. Warren explained that a development agreement is written by the City attorney and must be filed with the title to the property. The development agreement makes reference to and has, as an exhibit, each of the plans that make up the development plan. Commissioner Newman inquired about the open area along Logan Avenue. Mr. Warren pointed out that the plan shows it as a landscaped area only with no walkways or sidewalks thru this area. He added that a car wash cannot be added to this site. A PUD amendment would be required to make any changes to the plans as submitted. Commissioner Reem asked for further clarification on the signs being requested on the site. Mr. Warren explained that based on the City's Sign Ordinance, SuperAinerica is entitled to one • freestanding sign and signs on each side of the building walls limited to 15 percent of the wall area. Roof signs are only allowed in lieu of freestanding signs. Canopies with signs are allowed but they are considered a freestanding sign and are allowed only in lieu of a permitted freestanding sign. He further explained that no other gas station in the city is allowed a canopy sign in addition to a freestanding sign. PUBLIC HEARING— APPLICATION NO. 2002 -001 & 2002 -002 There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Newman, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2002 -001 and 2002 -002 at 9:22 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Willson called for comments from the public. Michael Cronin, SuperAmerica representative, introduced those with him at the meeting including Ron Meyers, Director of Operations for SuperAmerica in the metro area and Ryan LaFreniere, Engineer in charge of construction. Mr. Cronin explained how the size of the existing store and lot is a problem and pointed out how the design and relocation of the new store, by relocating it deeper into the commercial zone, is a better layout, which will benefit the community and residents of Brooklyn Center. He added that there will be no activity in the back of the store along the area where the property abuts the residential area. Mr. Cronin asked for the Planning Commission to concur with the sign plan submitted. He • explained how a business uses signs as a tool to attract customers and how they are important when operating a business to reach the public. SuperAmerica would like approval to put signs on the canopy in addition to the one allowed freestanding sign. He argued that this consideration 01 -31 -02 Page 3 could be given based on the fact that SuperAmerica would not take full advantage of all the signery they are entitled to. He noted their freestanding sign is less than the 145 sq. ft. allowed and the wall signs are quite a bit less than the allowed 15 percent of the wall area. • Mr. Warren explained that signs are generally not included as part of the development plan, rather they are submitted separately for review. He added that signs affixed to a canopy, a freestanding structure, have always been considered a freestanding sign. This site is only allowed one freestanding sign. He expressed the opinion that there appears to be no compelling reason or mitigating factor that should allow the canopy signs as part of the PUD. Commissioner Rahn asked about extending the sidewalk to Logan Avenue. Mr. Cronin agreed to add an extension of the sidewalk on the plans as noted for better access and safety for pedestrian traffic. Commissioner Rahn further asked about lights in the back of the store. Mr. Cronin responded that the back of the store is a no activity area with no lights other than a motion light by the back door. Mr. Robert Milavetz, owner of Milavetz law firm at 1915 57th Avenue North, stated that the area they are selling to SuperAmerica merely provides his property with a buffer zone between the land and SuperAmerica. He feels the improvements to the site would positively benefit the community and not hamper his business. Mr. Steve Mosey, 1918 Brookview Drive, stated that he was at the neighborhood meeting held by SuperAmerica and he finds the proposed improvements to the site a plus, as it will make access to the site much easier. • Ms. Donna Holm, 5639 Logan Ave North, acknowledged that the improvements would benefit the neighborhood as long as there are not any changes to the proposal. She frequently uses the convenience store and likes the idea of an expanded store with more products. She added that since her driveway is connected to the driveway at 5649 Logan Avenue, which will be demolished, they need the 8 ft. of property being conveyed to them by SuperAmerica or they would have a difficult time parking in their driveway. Commissioner Rahn thanked SuperAmerica for proposing these improvements. He lives in the neighborhood and appreciates the difficulty of limited access to the site. Mr. Ben Davidson, 5800 Girard Avenue North, a member of the Southeast Neighborhood Advisory Commission commented favorably on the proposal and also encouraged the SuperAmerica representative to maintain a neat and clean premises and be a good neighbor to the surrounding area. No other persons from the public appeared before the Commission during the public hearing on Application No. 2002 -001 and 2002 -002. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Whitehead, seconded by Commissioner Erdmann, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2002 -001 and 2002 -002, at 10:03 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. • The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Applications. 01 -31 -02 Page 4 Commissioner Boeck asked for further discussion on the proposed resolution. Mr. Warren described a change to the resolution to reflect a change in wording from "site and building plan" • to "development plan ". Mr. Warren pointed out that the final plat must be modified to show a change to 5639 Logan Avenue to include the 8 ft. of the property that will be conveyed to 5639 Logan from 5649 Logan Avenue. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 2002 -001 (SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA, LLC) Commissioner Boeck introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: "Planning Commission Resolution No. 2002 -01, Resolution Regarding the Recommended Disposition of Planning Commission Application No. 2002 -001 Submitted by Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC." The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner Whitehead and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Chair Willson Commissioners mm ssioners Boeck Er dmann, Newman, Rahn, Reem and Whitehead, and the following voted against the same: None; whereupon said resolution as declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution 2002 -001 is made part of these minutes by attachment. The Council will consider the recommendation at its February 11, 2002 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. • ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL APPLICATION NO. 2002 -002 (MARATHON ASHLAND PETROLEUM) There was a motion by Commissioner Rahn, seconded by Commissioner Whitehead, to recommend to the City Council that it approve Application No. 2002 -002 submitted b PP Y Ryan LaFreniere, of Marathon Ashland Petroleum for preliminary plat approval to divide and combine three parcels of land located at the southwest conger of 57th and Logan Avenues North into two lots subject to the following conditions: 1. Final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 3. Approval of this preliminary plat is contingent upon approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2002 -001. 4. The plat shall be modified to include the lot at 5639 Logan Avenue North and the proposed 8 ft. conveyance to be attached to that lot. Survey data shall be submitted to the City Engineer and the final plat shall include this lot. 5. Building permits for construction of the SuperAmerica building comprehended under Planning Commission Application No. 2002 -001 shall not be issued until the final plat has been approved by the City Council and filed with Hennepin S County. 01 -31 -02 Page 5 Voting in favor: Chair Willson, Commissioners Boeck, Erdmann, Newman, Rahn, Reem and Whitehead. The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the recommendation at its February 11, 2002, meeting. The applicant • must be re sent. Major changes to the application wed b the P p ) on as reviewed e lannin g Pp Y g Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Warren asked for the Commission's approval of the 2002 meeting scheduled. The Commission unanimously agreed to approve the schedule as submitted. Mr. Warren pointed out that meetings will be held at the West Fire Station at least through the end of April 2002. He added that an application has been received for the February 14, 2002 meeting. Mr. Warren informed the Commission that Wendy's restaurant has inquired about installin g a small freezer unit behind the building. He feels that this item does not need to go through the site and building plan process, but wanted the Commission to be informed of the plan. Commissioner Reem announced that she will be unable to attend the February 14, 2002 meeting. Commissioner Newman asked about reviewing the sign ordinance in the future. There was no other business. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Erdmann, to adjourn • the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m. Chair Recorded and transcribed by: Rebecca Crass Recording Secretary • 01 -31 -02 Page 6 I City Council Agenda Item No. 10a MEMORANDUM DATE: Februar y 4 , 2002 TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager es FROM: Jim Glasoe, Director of Community Activities, Recreation and Services SUBJECT: Resolution Expressing Appreciation for the Gift of the Brooklyn Center Li Club in Support of Our Family Fun Day Activities The Brooklyn Center Lions Club has presented to the City a donation of six hundred dollars ($600.00.) They have designated that it be used to support our February 9, 2002 Family Fun Day activities. Staff recommends acceptance of this donation and asks that it be coded to the correspond M." activity budget. • • • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR THE GIFT OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER LIONS CLUB IN SUPPORT OF OUR FAMILY FUN DAY ACTIVITIES WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Lions Club has resented to the City a donation of y p ty six hundred dollars ($600.00) and has designated it be used to support the Family Fun Day activities; and WHEREAS, the City Council is appreciative of the donation and commends the Brooklyn Center Lions Club for its civic efforts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota: 1. Acknowledges the donation with gratitude. 2. Appropriates the donation to the corresponding activity budget. • Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • City Council Agenda Item No. 10b • MEMORANDUM TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Tom Bublitz, Community Development Specialis 1 DATE: February 5, 2002 SUBJECT: Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing on Proposed Use of 2002 Urban Hermepin County Community Development Block Grant Funds Hennepin County has notified the City of Brooklyn Center that its share of the 2002 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement will be $234,516. This amount is a $7,778 decrease over last years allocation of $242,294. Brooklyn Center is one of 43 Hennepin County cities participating in the Urban Hemzepin County CDBG program. In this program, Federal dollars from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) flow to the County and are dispersed to the 43 participating cities. The 2002 • CDBG allocation for the entire County is $3,525,000, which is a decrease of $66,000 over the 2001 County allocation. The Federal authorizing statute for the CDBG program requires that each funded activity meet one of three national objectives: benefiting low and moderate income persons, preventing or eliminating slums and /or blight and meeting urgent community needs. The Federal statute also specifies that each grantee must ensure at least 70% of the CDBG expenditure during the program year must be used for activities benefiting very low and low income persons. In the past, the County has managed and met this requirement at the County level and individual cities did not have to meet the 70% requirement at the local level. Due to an increase in the amount of funds allocated and expended on activities removing or preventing shuns or blight by cities, the County could no longer ensure that it could meet the statutory requirement. Each City has to meet this requirement at the local level. For 2002, meeting the 70% requirement means that $164,161 of the total $234,516 allocation must be expended on programs and services directly benefiting low income persons. Low income persons are defined as persons with incomes ranging from 50% (very low income) to 80% (low income) of the median household income in the Minneapolis /St. Paul metropolitan area as defined by HUD. As an example, a four person household earning $37,350 annually would be defined as a very low income household and a four person household at $52,500 income annually is defined as low income. • MEMORANDUM • February 5, 2002 Page 2 SUMMARY OF CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 2002 CDBG PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Allocation of $175,000 for Shingle Creek Tower Project. The City is proposing to assist a private developer ( AMCON) with the acquisition of Shingle Creek Tower, a 122 unit apartment building. AMCON is proposing to purchase and renovate Shingle Creek Tower and preserve the 122 units as an affordable rental project. The City has already reallocated $150,000 from its 2001 CDBG allocation and proposes to allocate $175,000 from the 2003 CDBG allocation for a total contribution of $500,000 to preserve Shingle Creek Tower as affordable rental housing. 2. Allocation of $22,000 for Household Outside Maintenance for the Elderly (H.O.M.E.) program. This project has been part of the CDBG program for eight years. The H.O.M.E. program provides minor maintenance and repair for persons 60 years of age and older and or permanently disabled individuals. Services provided include painting, interior and exterior, and minor home maintenance repair including installation of grab bars, and minor repairs including windows, sidewalk, house trim etc. Fees are charged to persons using the services i based on a sliding fee scale relative to income, pursuant to Department of Housing and Urban Development guidelines for low and moderate income. Senior Community Services, the administrator of the H.O.M.E. program, also makes available its Senior Outreach program to assist elderly and disabled residents who have violations in the areas of the City housing code. A copy of Senior Community Services CDBG request is included with this memorandum. 3. Allocation of 513,000 to the Community Emergency Assistance Program Inc. (LEAP) to provide funds to CEAP's Handyworks program. The Handyworks program provides chore services to seniors and disabled persons at little or no cost and includes services such as lawn mowing, snow shoveling, housekeeping, household maintenance, painting and raking. CEAP also is to provide assistance to seniors and disabled persons with code violations under the City's housing code. CEAP and Senior Community Services are to coordinate referrals between the two agencies. CEAP is to focus on less complex code enforcement items and Senior Community Services addresses the more complex code enforcement issues up to including major problems such as "garbage house" situations. A copy of CEAP's CDBG request is included with this memorandum 4. Allocation of $24,516 for rehabilitation of private property. This program provides up to $15,000 per household for rehabilitation and repair of homes of low income households. The money is provided in the form of a loan which would be repaid when the house is sold, or at • the end of 30 years, whichever come first. MEMORANDUM • February 5, 2002 Page 3 CAP ON PUBLIC SERVICE PROJECTS Each City receiving a CDBG allocation form the Urban Hennepin County CDBG program is limited to a 15 percent cap on public service projects. For 2002 this amount is $35,177 which is 15 percent of the City's 2002 allocation of $234,516. Staff recommends reducing the amount allocated to the H.O.M.E. program and CEAP by $500 each to meet this requirement. Instead of the $22,500 requested by H.O.M.E. and $13,500 requested by CEAP, the allocation would be reduced to $22,000 and $13,000 respectively. ADDITIONAL REQUEST FOR CDBG FUNDING The City has received a Request for $10,000 from CDBG funds form Home Line. A copy of Home Line's request is included with this memoranda n. A Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing is included with this memorandum and the required public hearing notice has been prepared and includes continued funding of the the H.O.M.E. program CEAP, and Housing Rehabilitation Program along with the Shingle Creek Tower Project. The resolution prepared for City Council consideration and included with this memorandum is to establish a date for the required public hearing. Hennepin County requires that specific dollar • allocations be specified in the hearing notice. This notice does not commit the City to specific funding at this time and these programs and dollar allocations can be revised at the public hearing on March 11, 2002. • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 2002 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Notice is hereby given that the City of Brooklyn Center in cooperation with Hennepin County, pursuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, is holding a public hearing on March 11, 2002, at 7 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, at the West Fire Station, 6250 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. The public hearing is on, the housing and community development needs and the City's proposed use of the 2002 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program planning allocation of $234,516. In addition, between July 1, 2002 to June 30, 2003, it is estimated that no additional program income from previously funded CDBG activities will be available to the City. The City of Brooklyn Center is proposing to undertake the following activities with 2002 Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds starting on or about July 1, 2002. Activity Budget Shingle Creek Tower Project $175,000* • Neighborhood Public Service Projects $35,000 Rehabilitation of Private Property $24,516 The City of Brooklyn Center also proposes to allocate an additional $175, 000 from its anticipated 2003 allocation of CDBG funds for the Shingle Creek Tower Project. For additional information on the priorities, proposed activities, level of funding and program performance, contact the City of Brooklyn Center at 763 -569 -3300 or the Hennepin County Office of Planning & Development at 952 -541 -7080. The ublic hearing is being held pursuant to MS 471.59. p g g P • SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 10709 Wa Wayzata Blvd. 111 N 5 Phone: 952 541 -1019 FAX: 952 ,Suit e , Minnetonka, M 5530 0 ) ( ) 541 -0841 Y BOARD OF DIRECTORS Dr. Chinyere (Ike) Njaka January 18, 2002 President Francis Hagen Mr, Tom Bublitz ist Vice President Community Development Specialist Mary Henning City of Brooklyn Center 2nd Vice President 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Scott Brandt Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Treasurer Bob Bean Dear M�bhtz: Secretary Laurie LaFontaine Senior Community Services is requesting that the City of Brooklyn Past President Center allocate $22,500 from it's share of Community Development John C. Boeder Block Grant (CDBG) Year XXVIH funds to support the HOME Member -at -Large Program. This is the same level of funding provided in the current Gordon Hughes year. Enclosed is a Hennepin County Request for Funding Member -at -Large application filled out to facilitate our request. S eter Y enator ley Boschwitz Brooklyn Center's CDBG funds will be leveraged from client fees, rty Guritz funds from the United Way, the Greater Minneapolis Council of o Higuchi Churches, Hennepin County. Friends of HOME, an organization Dwight Johnson that solicits contributions from individuals, businesses, civic groups Gloria Johnson Kevin Krueger and churches provides support as well. Rep. Ann Lenczewski Dotty O'Brien Sincerely, Senator Gen Olson Curtis A. Pearson Mary Tambornino Leonard J. Thiel Thomas Thorfinnson Ron Bloch Tom Ticen Program Administrator Benjamin F. Withhart Executive Director& C.E.O. PROGRAMS • Multi- Purpose Senior Centers • Senior Outreach • H.O.M.E. • Transportation A Founding Member of •Eldercare Partners I A United Way Agency • 2002 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM REQUEST FOR FUNDING (Use one form per project) A. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. City: Brooklyn Center 2. Project Name: HOME (Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly) 3. Contact Person/ Phone No. Ron Bloch/ (952) 541 -1019 B. PROJECT DATA 1. CDBG Funding Request $ 22.500 2. Is this an existing CDBG- funded project? _X Yes No 3. Leveraged Funds: (What other public or private funds does project include? If none, indicate w /check here- None: ) Amount $ See #10 Source See #10 • Amount $ Source Amount $ Source 4. Project Location: Address or Citywide X 5. Project Description: (Describe the project in as much detail as possible, including the local need(s) the project will address) See attached Program Summary 6. Consolidated Plan Priorities: Using the Priority Summary identify what priority(ies) the project will meet. (Note: If a proposed project is a low urban county priority, you must explain why it has a higher priority in your community.) Priority(ies) project will address _Public Service Needs: Senior Services - Benefitina low and moderate income persons – High Priority 0 Continue —0 r 7. Describe anticipated results/accomplishments lishments the project will have. number o P P P J ( .f persons / households to be assisted /served, number of housing units to be rehabbed /built, etc.) In 2001 the project served 35 Brooklyn Center residents (26 households). It is anticipated that approximately the same number will be served in CDBG Year XXVIII 8. Describe how project will assist the community in achieving your Livable Communities Act goals (if applicable) 9. Implementation Schedule: (Identi& major project tasks to occur during withinn the first 12 months of the 24 month expenditure period. ) Task On -going delivery of services includine_ Date CDBG Year XXVIII Maintenance (minor repairs in the areas of camentrv. Dlumbine. concrete work. electrical and interior /exterior Daintina). "Chore Services" (lawn mowing and snow shoveling). and Homemakine (floor cleaninQ_. vacuuming. dusting, window washing. doing wash). 10. Budget: (Speck total project budget by� major project component —i.e; administration, planning, construction, acquisition, direct grants, public service.) BUDGET/ SOURCE OF FUNDS Component CDBG Other (identifv) Public Services /Eden Prairie $ 10,320 $ 95,000 Client fees Public Services /Edina $ 10,350 $ 15,650 Edina/EEHF Public Services/Richfield $ 22.700 $ 44,602 United Way Public Services/Minnetonka $ 17,800 $ 52.574 GMCC Public ServicesBrooklvn Center $ 22.500 $ 10,000 Contributions $ $ 84,592 Hen County Project Totals $ 83.670 $ 302,418 • 0:\DPUPR0G1CDBG \CDBG2002 \form application.doc • Attachment H.O.M.E. (Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly) Program Summary SUMMARY PARAGRAPH — The H.O.M.E. Program is a homemaker, maintenance and chore services program designed as a cost - effective alternative to rising costs of long term care for the elderly. It currently operates in the cities of Bloomington, Brooklyn Center, Crystal, Eden Prairie, Edina, Golden Valley, Minnetonka, New Hope, Plymouth, Richfield, Robbinsdale and St. Louis Park. Persons with disabilities are also eligible for the services. The Program maintains a core staff of trained individuals to assure prompt, quality services and a skills bank component. Clients are asked to pay for services based on ability (sliding fee scale). TARGET POPULATION — Consumers of H.O.M.E. services are residents age 60+ or people with disabilities who live independently and need some affordable in -home services in order to maintain their residence. The Program serves clients who need assistance but are not financially able to afford the full cost of the service as well as frail older adults who require services designed to meet their needs. SERVICES — The philosophy of the H.O.M.E. Program is to help maintain independence for elders and avoid premature nursing home placement by providing homemaker, maintenance and chore services. Clients are asked to pay based on a sliding -fee scale. Homemaker services include housecleaning, food preparation, grocery shopping, doing laundry and window washing. • Assessments are made and services provided according to the specific needs of each client for type of service, time and frequency. Chore/home maintenance services include snow removal, lawn care, installation of security features, carpentry, minor plumbing, interior /exterior painting, weatherization, minor roof repair and other jobs needed to enable elderly residents to remain in their homes, as well as maintaining their homes in an accordance with community standards. STAFF — Home maintenance and homemaker services are provided by workers who are trained in the techniques of working with elders. Skills Bank Workers (independent contractors) are also utilized to provide chore services. Staff report to a Program Director, who is responsible for their supervision and daily Program operation. Other staff and volunteers provide administrative and clerical support. FACILITY — Services are delivered in the homes of elderly residents. Program offices are located at Creekside Community Center, 9801 Penn Ave. South, Bloomington and 7940 55 "' Ave. North, New Hope. A satellite office is located at the Minnetonka Senior Center. PLACEMENT PROCEDURE — Clients gain access to the Program either directly by contacting the H.O.M.E. office or by referral from an area agency. FUNDING SOURCES — Revenues are derived from client fees, a homemaking services contract with Hennepin County, the Greater Minneapolis Council of Churches (GMCC) in support of chore services, cities in which the Program operates, the United Way, and contributions from clients and Friends of HOME, an organization that solicits donations from businesses, churches and community groups. 0 ASSISr �o January 31, 2002 Mr. Tom Bublitz Community Development Specialist City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Dear Mr. Bublitz: Community Emergency Assistance Program, Inc. (CEAP) requests your consideration of the following grant proposal for the 2002 -2003 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds available in the amount of $13,500. The grant will be used to fund CEAP's HandyWorks Chore Program. CDBG funds allow CEAP to continue to serve Brooklyn Center seniors and disabled persons, specifically with home delivered chore services. CEAP offers many other services including food, clothing, special events, home - delivered meals, and financial assistance. The services that we provide • are of great value to those who have a demonstrated need in our community. The majority of our clients are low income and qualify under HUD guidelines. We hope that the City of Brooklyn Center will again join with CEAP in support of families and seniors in our community. Please contact me if you need additional information. Sincerely, Tom Hardin Director of Administration Enclosures: Brooklyn Center CDBG Application Fiscal Year 2001 Audited Financial Statements Fiscal Year 2002 Budget 2000 Annual Report Board of Directors List 501(c)(3) Letter from IRS Program Statistics for Brooklyn Center Families- Year 2001 • 6840 78th Ave. N. - Brooklyn Park, MN 55445 - (763) 566 -9600 Fax (763) 566 -9604 O 1201 89th Ave N.E., Suite 130 - Blaine, MN 55434 - (763) 783 -4930 Fax (763) 783 -4927 U, R „<. 2002 S URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM REQUEST FOR FUNDING A. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Community: Brooklvn Center 2. Name of Organization: Communitv Emeraencv Assistance Program, Inc. (CEAP) 3. Contact Person: Tom Hardin or Stephen Klein Phone Number: 763 - 566 -9600 B. PROJECT DATA 1. Grant Amount Requested: $ 13,500 2. Is this request to fund an existing project? X Yes No Is this an existing project Brooklyn Center CDBG- FUNDED Project? X Yes No 3. Leveraged Funds: Amount $ See # 10 Source See #10 4. Project Location: Address: 6840 78 Avenue North, Brooklvn Park, Minnesota 55445 Is the program available Citywide? X Yes No • 5. Project Description: Program Name: CEAP Senior Services- HandvWorks Chore Proaram Where will the program activities be carried out? In the cities of Brooklvn Park, Brooklvn Center, and the Camden area of Minneapolis., CEAP HandvWorks Proqram: Chore services are provided at little or no cost to seniors and disabled persons. Services include lawn mowing, snow shoveling, housekeeping, household maintenance, painting and raking. An agency budget for 2002, including Senior Services, is enclosed. Our budget for 2003 is not yet complete. Referrals for senior services are taken from family members, clients, medical workers, churches, government workers, and other social service agencies. CEAP's HandyWorks program will also resolve some code violations for resident seniors and permanently disabled persons. CEAP will determine which code violations it is capable of resolving. CEAP also provides a Meals at Your Door Prociram: Provides hot prepared meals, which are delivered by volunteers to homebound seniors and disabled persons Monday through Friday. Needs Met CEAP is the only social service organization in Brooklyn Center that provides the majority of these services. Senior Community Services also provides some household maintenance and painting services. Low cost chores are usually not available through private business. Most of our clients are low income and need subsidized or low cost services through CEAP. CEAP participates in a metro -wide network of senior providers to avoid duplication of services. 9 6. Consolidated Plan Priorities: • Priority (ies) Public Service Needs: Senior Services — Benefitina low and moderate income persons — Hiah Prioritv 7. Describe anticipated results /accomplishments project will have. By providing these programs to seniors and disabled persons in Brooklyn Center, CEAP hopes to help them remain in their homes longer. These services are oftentimes the only thing keeping people from having to enter assisted care living situations. CEAP served more than 109 Brooklyn Center residents with the Meals at Your Door program, and over 72 residents with the HandyWorks program in 2001. Over 25,907 meals were delivered and 588 chores or 156 hours were provided to Brooklyn Center residents in 2001. We expect that demand will continue to rise and that 2002 will increases in all categories. Measurement of results: All chores performed for clients are tracked on a HandyWorks version of Filemaker Pro. We have a Senior Service Director and a Senior Services Assistant who coordinate both programs and who does intakes on clients, sets up client files, track all services and conducts follow up with clients. CEAP also has a senior service outcome initially designed for the United Way. The outcome: Area seniors and disabled persons will feel less isolated and feel more connected with their community and others. We measure this outcome by conducting surveys by phone and mail, at least once per year. Our target is that 75% of our clients will report feeling less isolated. In 2001 over 76% of CEAP's senior, service clients reported feelina less isolated and 79% feel thev remain more. independent. 8. Describe how project will assist community in achieving your Livable Communities Act goals. (if applicable) 9. Implementation Schedule: Identify the major project tasks to occur during the first 12 months of the 24 -month expenditure time period. Task Month /Date This is a year- round, continuing program that has activities in every month. HandvWorks: Chore projects currently occur on an ongoing basis. Homemaking is done on an ongoing basis and includes: cleaning, window washing, floor cleaning, dusting, etc. Many of the chores are seasonal. Fall raking, winter snow shoveling, and warm weather lawn care, are coordinated with the Senior Services staff and their workers /volunteers. They update the client and job database on a daily basis. CEAP also performs minor home repair, maintenance and painting projects by request. The request can be made by a senior /disabled adult or by a referring agency or city. We will attempt to resolve city code violations, if it is within the scope of our program, contracted workers, and volunteer groups. Surveys are conducted a minimum of two times per year. One survey is the client satisfaction survey, and the other is the outcome measurement survey. Meals at Your Door: Meals are currently being delivered five days per week. • Weekend and holiday meals are also available. The coordinator ensures that there are enough volunteers to deliver the meals, and that the client database is updated daily. Surveys are conducted a minimum of two times per year. One survey is the • client satisfaction survey, and the other is the outcome measurement survey. 10. Budget: (Specify total project budget by major project component -i.e. administration, planning, construction, acquisition, direct grants, public service.) Total Senior Services Budget for FY ending 6 /30/02: $ 211,631. (The budget for FY ending 6/30/03 has not yet been developed, but we expect that the senior portion will increase 3 -5 %.) An itemized budget for both the agency and Senior Services is included as an attachment. BUDGET /SOURCE OF FUNDS Component CDBG Other (Identify) Total Senior Services Senior Services- Brooklyn Park $ 7,500 Title III Fed. $ 51,622 - Minneapolis $ -0- Henn. Co. $ 4,500 - Brooklyn Center $13,500 United Way $ 27,441 - Champlin $ -0- Meals /fees $ 99,568 Community $ 7,500 Project Totals: $ 21,000 $190,631 TOTAL Senior Services: $ 211,631 r ALLOCATION OF BUDGET CEAP • EXPENSE LINE ITEM BUDGET FY 2002 (7/1/01 - 6/30/02) 1 FAMILY SERVICES I SENIOR SERVICES I TOTAL AGENCY SALARIES (See attached sheet) S 513,876.00 S 90,684.00 S 604,560.00 FICA $ 31,860.55 $ 5,622.45 $ 37,483.00 MEDICARE $ 7,451.10 $ 1,314.90 $ 8,766.00 UNEMPLOYMENT $ 3,890.45 $ 686.55 $ 4,577.00 WORKERS COMP $ 1,190.00 $ 210.00 $ 1,400.00 Tt� ILL PAYROLL TAXES 44.392.10 - S. 7;833.9 4 S 52,226 00 LIFE INSURANCE 1 $ 270.00 $ 1,800.00 MEDICAL $ 32,963.00 $ 5,817.00 $ 38,780.00 LONG TERM DISABILITY $ 5 $ 886.80 $ 5,912.00 RETIREMENT $ 25,693.80 $ 4 $ 30,228.00 TOTAL EMPLOYEE BENEFIT . S 65.212.00 S 14508.04 S 76,720.00 AUDIT/PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 6,240.00 $ 3,360.00 $ 9,600.00 CONTRACT SERV. HANDYWKS $ 5,600.00 $ 5,600.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES $ 6 $ 3,500.00 $ 10,000.00 POSTAGE $ 2,925.00 $ 1,575.00 $ 4,500.00 MAIN'T'ENANCE SUPPLIES $ 617.50 $ 332.50 $ 950.00 .TOTAL SUPPLIES- S . 16,282.50 . ::S :::; : 14;367.5iL.::5 .: 30,650.00 MAYD $ - $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 CHRISTMAS $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 FOOD SHELF $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 STIPENDS $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 • SHELTER/UTILITIES $ 129,000.00 $ 129,000.00 TRANSPORTATION $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 BACK TO SCHOOL $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 SPECIAL NEEDS $ 20 000.00 $ 20,000.00 HENN CO WELFARE/WK ASST $ 19 $ 19,000.00 ANOKA CO FAITH FORUM FUND $ 500.00 $ 500.00 ANOKA TRANS /CAR FUND $ 134,500.00 $ 134,500.00 :. ANOKA HMLS /OTHER AGENCIES $ 60.000.00 $ 60,000.00 NEEDS TOTAL;IVEEDS OF.I?EOPLE_ S 435,504.00 S 14,000.00::.; S`: 495,500 -00 UTILITIES $ 3,575.00 $ 1 $ 5 TELEPHONE $ 5,200.00 $ 2,800.00 $ 8,000.00 TRASH / RECYCLING $ 1,040.00 $ 560.00 $ 1.600.00 BLDG/ GROUNDS MAINT $ 4.550.00 $ 2,450.00 $ 7,000.00 FACILITY RENTAL $ 21,379.00 $ - $ 21,379.00 TOTAL OCCUPANCY ::.S 35,744.00 S 7 : S ::: 43,479-00 STAFF DEVELOPMENT $ 4,675.00 $ 825.00 $ 5,500.00 FURNITURE /EQUIPMENT $ 5.928.65 $ 3,192.35 $ 9,121.00 TRAVEL, STAFF / VOLUNTEER S 2.110.55 $ 1,136.45 $ 3,247.00 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION $ 2,145.00 $ 1,155.00 $ 3,300.00 COivL 1UNICATIONS $ 3,900.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 6,000.00 DUES / MEMBERSHIPS S 975.00 S 525.00 $ 1.500.00 INSURANCE $ 5,005.00 $ 2,695.00 $ 7,700.00 DEPRECIATION $ 12.673.05 $ 6,823.95 $ 19,497.00 MISCELLANEOUS S 1.950.00 S 1.050.00 $ 3.000.00 • TOTAL OTHER : S 39,362.25 S 19,502.75. _S 58,865.00 TOTAL AGENCY BUDGET S _ V 1,150,368.85 S 211,631.15 S 1.362,000.00 CEAP REVENUE LINE ITEM BUDGET FY 2002 7/1/01- 6/30/02 • FAMILY SERVICES SENIOR SERVICES TOTAL AGENCY INDIVIDUAL $ 64,621.85 $ 1,000.00 $ 65,621.85 CHURCHES $ 155,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 157,500.00 BUSINESSES $ 31,500.00 $ 1,000,00 $ 32,500.00 ORGANIZATIONS $ 85.000.00 $ 2.000.00 $ 87,000.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY SUPPORT S 336,121.85 S 6,500.00 S 342,621.85 MAYD $ - $ 99,418.15 $ 99,418.15 HANDYWORKS $ - $ 150.00 $ 150.00 TOTAL, PROGRAM FEES S - S 99,568.15 S 99,568.15 ANOKA COUNTY/MCKNIGHT/TANF $ 66,500.00 $ 66,500.00 ANOKA COUNTY $ 13,170.00 $ - $ 13,170.00 ANOKA COUNTY HOMELESS/TANF $ 21,300.00 $ - $ 21,300.00 ANOKA HMLSS /OTHER AGENCY $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY $ 71,843.00 $ - $ 71,843.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY HOMELESS $ 15,000.00 $ - $ 15,000.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY/MCKNIGHT $ 23,725.00 $ 23,725.00 TITLE III MEALS/ VOA $ 30,500.00 $ 30,500.00 TITLE III HANDYWORKS $ $ 21,122.00 $ 21,122.00 H.C. PRE - SCREENING HANDYWKS $ - $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 . FENLA $ 31,000.00 $ - $ 31,000.00 CDBG $ 30,000.00 $ - $ 30,000.00 DBG $ 27,307.00 $ 13,500.00 $ 40,807.00 TOTAL GOVERNMENT $ 359,845.00 S 69,622.00 S 429,467.00 FOUNDATIONS $ 105,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 106,000.00 UNITED WAY $ 192,002.00 $ 34,941.00 $ 226,943.00 UNITED WAY DESIGNATED $ 12,400.00 $ - $ 12,400.00 INVESTMENT INCOME $ 27,000.00 $ - $ 27,000.00 REPAYMENTS $ 105,000.00 $ - $ 105.000.00 ORIGINATION FEES- FLP ADN N $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS $ 5,000.00 $ - $ 5,000.00 OTHER REVENUE S 454,402.00 S 35,941.00 S 490,343.00 TOTAL REVENUE S 1,150,368.85 S 211,631.15 S 1.362,000.00 CEAP Board of Directors — July 2001 Joan Bednarczyk Marc A. Kermisch- Treasurer 525 Jackson Street, Anoka, MN 55303 17210 B 49` Avenue North • W- (763) 712 -7441 H- (763) 753 -2284 F -(763) 421 -4230 Plymouth, MN 55446 E -mail: jbednarczyk @ststephenschurch.org W- (952) 94 -6628 H- (763) 478 -6111 F -(952) 253 -1729 Pastoral Minister, St. Stephen Catholic Church E -mail: mkennisch @fimi.com C- (763) 443 -2794 Product Manager, Financial Information Management, Inc Walt Beneke- President 7600 Arthur St. NE, Fridley, MN 55432 Kathleen Mary Kiemen -Past President W -(763) 514 -4522 H -(763) 786 -1251 F- (763)514 -3362 9600 Regent Avenue N, Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 E -mail: walter.a.beneke @medtronic.com W- (763)424 -8770 H -(651) 224 -1283 F -(763) 424 -4327 Small Business, Medtronic Corporation E -mail: Kiemen@core.com Director of Outreach, St. Gerard's Catholic Church Jerry Blamey- Vice President 7136 Willow Lane North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Richard McGee H -(763) 560 -0184 8028 Morgan Circle, Brooklyn Park, MN 55444 E -mail: Blame4@aol.com W- 1 -(651) 385 -2708 H- (763) 560 -8608 Cross of Glory Lutheran Church E -mail: RMcGee @PIIC.org Attorney, Prairie Island Community Reverend Heidi S. Caldwell 7217 West Broadway, Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 Jamie Morrow W -(763) 60 -8958 H -(763) 560 -9052 F -(763) 560 -5623 1171 Yuma Lane, Plymouth, MN 55447 E -mail: hcaldwell @princeofpeacecliurch.org W- (651)646 -2591 x 7172 H- (763)473 -3694 F- 921 -1438 Pastor, Prince of Peace Lutheran Church E -mail: imorrow @worldnet.att.net Goodwill /Easter Seals Joyce Ellis 7137 Halifax Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Jeanne Radotich H- (763) 561 -7351 707 89 Avenue NE, Blaine, MN 55434 St. Alphonsus Catholic Church W -(763) 784 -1329/ 792 -1619 H- (763) 421 -0756 F- (763)784 -0652 • Joen Grieb -Ott E -mail: jradotich @churchofsttimothy.com 5108 80 Court North, Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 Pastoral Minister, Church of St. Timothy (763) 493 -9106 E -mail: JCGO1 @juno.com Ellen Raeker Epiphany Catholic Church 451 Rice Creek Terrace, Fridley, MN 55432 H- (763) 574 -1811 Franz Hoefferle Retired, Physician, Multicare Assoc. Medical Clinics 11080 Cottonwood Circle NW St. William's Catholic Church Coon Rapids, MN 55448 W- (763)576 -7558 Fax (763)576 -7550 Navdeep Sodhi E -mail: franz.hoefferle @allina.com 17030 76` Place North Financial Analyst, Mercy Hospital Maple Grove, MN 55311 W- (763)514 -3650 H -(763) 420 -2705 F- (763)514 -6476 Laura Jaeger - Secretary E -mail: navdeep.sodhi @medtronic.com 5500 80 Avenue N, Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 Manager, Pricing & Contracts, Medtronic Corporation W -(952) 914 -6235 H -(763) 560 -7663 F -(952) 946 -3292 E -Mail: Laura_Jaeger @ADC.com Community Relations Specialist, ADC Foundation Rebecca White 4239 Vincent Avenue North, Minneapolis, MN 55412 Eva Jeppson W- (612) 752 -0866 H- (612) 529 -8260 2386 Lehman Lane, Blaine, MN 55449 E -mail: whiterl @wellsfargo.com W -(763) 574 -2000 H -(763) 792 -0304 F -(763) 571 -6565 Operations Analyst, Wells Fargo Online Brokerage St. Philip's Lutheran Church E -mail: Ejeppson @cbburnet.com Realtor, Coldwell Banker Burnet • Robert G. Kelly 6513 Beard Avenue Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 H- (763) 561 -3295 Brooklyn United Methodist Church • J (7 - t -t . � F -' H, t -' o.. ") i =i � Cz7 - -7 '(1 C ) I -A ;4 '-3 C) Ul (f) l 1{ 0 (T) Cl Ft 0 CI fjj tc." C) O 11 0 0 ,, w u Op (L) c 0) 'J ko sy ti 1) rt, G? f-- I-Q f 0 (D (1) M : 1 rj C Cl) f r - F � Ct fl (T) D IT C (+ 0 CD - D to I-A J--h 17 C) 0 Cl "A, r- , 4 o t- (T) ( - ) (D ' �l r I � �o in ;1) (1) (D I— Fll I (T) rt (10 ITJ 04 (D (D M tC) I-h (1- 0 0 , t 1 1, r rt (T" 1-1 (1) (D 1-1 - (, r r CD C) I I TJ , 0 f t j fZ m S a 7 Co " 1-, 0 (T) 0 M C CD (D I-0 GD (t M (,--) t -. p --- P- 51, (D ;-C) 00 tzi C 0 k (D N CD IT) (v rt H P- (D (11 Ct k"j, 0 IQ 0) 1 3 C� c n n : 0 Hl F1 rS Fl) CEAP HandyWorks Brooklyn Center 2001 �ob Type Jobs % of Total Hours Amt Pd. Subsidy A - Seasonal outdoor 72 12.2% 304.15 $527.00 $177.00 B - Heavy indoor 2 0.3% 13.00 $156.00 $0.00 C - Minor repair 19 3.2% 54.00 $437.00 $157.00 D - Mowing, snow removal 311 52.9% 382.50 $3,755.00 $798.00 E - Routine indoor 110 18.7% 237.00 $1,543.00 $943.00 F - Fall Raking 14 2.4% 234.50 $0.00 $97.50 S- Social 60 10.2% 31.25 $12.00 $0.00 Grand Total 588 100.0% 1256.40 $6,430.00 $2,172.50 • • Printed: 1/30/2002 2000 Annual Report Job Type Jobs % of Total Hours Amt. Pd. Subsidy A - Sesonal Outdoor 155 2207.25 $508.50 $205.50 B- Heavy Indoor 32 246.75 $475.00 $174.00 C - Minor Repair 103 440.25 $2,295.51 $268.25 D - Mowing, snow removal 898 971.00 $6,620.50 $2,538.50 E - Routine indoor 269 297.55 $5,337.50 $677.00 S - Social 159 119.85 $0.00 $0.00 TOTALS 1616 0.00 4282.65 $15,237.01 $3,863.25 Annual Client Count by City 1/1/2000 - 12131/2000 City Clients Households Jobs Hours Brooklyn Park 45 40 310 1,271.75 Brooklyn Center 101 83 663 1,884.15 Minneapolis 46 39 627 1,391.25 Champlin 8 6 16 35.50 TOTALS 200 168 1616 4,582.65 • HOME r • ® 3455 Bloomington Avenue Office Phone: 612/728 -5770 Hotline: 612/728 -5767 Minneapolis, MN 55407 Fax: 612/728 -5761 Mr. Tom Bublitz City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 January 24, 2002 Dear Mr. Bublitz: Enclosed with this letter is HOME Line's application to the City of Brooklyn Center's CDBG program in the amount of $10,000. As you may know, HOME Line began as a project of Community Action for Suburban Hennepin in 1992. Following our spin -off from CASH in 1999, we continued to be funded by that agency for two years, until June of 2001. The funding from CASH has ended and we are seeking support from cities in suburban Hennepin County that we have served and continue to serve. HOME Line's tenant hotline receives hundreds of calls each year from Brooklyn Center residents. Since we started up the hotline we have received 2,295 calls from Brooklyn Center • renters; the third highest number by city in the county. Nearly all (98%) of callers from Brooklyn Center have been low or moderate income. In addition, our award- winning high school presentations (on becoming a successful first -time renter) have been given 38 times in Brooklyn Center schools, reaching 758 students. These schools include Brooklyn Center High School, Osseo -Park Center High School, Park - Center Alternative School, and Osseo Learning Center. I am enclosing a one -page sheet summarizing our hotline's service to Brooklyn Center residents and a two -page description of the programs HOME Line offers. I have also enclosed our current operating budget and a listing of other funding sources for HOME Line. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this application. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 612/728 -5770, extension 106 or Mike Vraa, our managing attorney at extension 113. Sincerely, Charlie Warner Executive Director enclosures as noted • Tenant Advocacy in Minnesota HOME Line Renters' "Hotline" t Brooklyn Center Information on calls during the period 1/1/92 through 12/31/2001 Over the past ten years a total of 2,295 Number of Calls Per Year Brooklyn Center renters have contacted 400 300 286 285 225 256 HOME Line. This represents service to 200 approximately 5 73 / pp y residents when all 92 93 94 95 9e 97 98 99 2000 2001 family, members have been counted. The vast majority (over 98 %) of Brooklyn Callers' Incomes 1992 -2001 Center callers to HOME Line are low or very low income. These income categories are those used by the U.S. Department of H.U.D.: very Law _88%10% Low Very Low: incomes below 50% of the metro median Low: incomes between 50% and 80% of the metro Moderate median o Moderate: incomes above 80% of the metro median. HOME Line has helped Brooklyn Center • residents recover money from their landlords. High School Renter's Education Tenants have received $9,891.69 back from HOME Line's High School Community improperly withheld security deposits and Renter's Education Program provides advice $14,593 in rent abatements (refunds for on tenant rights and responsibilities. This free substandard conditions). presentation covers most things that first time The Hotline receives approximately 6,000 renters are likely to encounter, including calls per year. Careful records are taken for roommate problems, evictions, security each call, including the reason the tenant deposits and repair problems. called. These are the top ten topics in In the last ten years, HOME Line has been to Brooklyn Center over the last ten years 38 classes with Brooklyn Center students (followed by the number of calls): speaking to 758 students. 1. Repairs 505 Brooklyn Center High School 21 classes, 2. Evictions 359 speaking to 399 students; 3. Notice to Vacate 233 Osseo -Park Center High School 13 classes, 4. Security Deposits 222 speaking to 288 students; 5. Information Only 114 Park - Center Alternative School 2 classes, 6. Financial Aid 102 speaking to 21 students; 7. Break Lease 96 Osseo Learning Center 2 classes, speaking 8. Housing Search 91 to 50 students. 9. Lease Questions 85 10. Privacy/Intrusion 73 • ROME r p • 3455 Bloomington Avenue ® Office Phone: 612/728 -5770 Hotline: 612/728 -5767 Minneapolis, MN 55407 Fax: 612/728 -5761 HOME Line's Programs for Renters HOME Line was established in 1 992 at Community Action for Suburban Hennepin (CASH), the "anti- poverty" agency serving Minneapolis' suburbs. Currently, HOME Line has a staff of eight: four staff attorneys who operate the tenant hotline and education program and three full -time tenant organizers working with tenant organizations and leaders; all aspects of HOME Line's programs are overseen by a project director. We also sponsor two VISTAs (Volunteers in Service to America); one is engaged in tenant organizing work, the other with the hotline. In May 1 999, the CASH board decided to "spin off' the HOME Line operation and agreed to provide support for two years in cash and in -kind assistance, primarily to underwrite the tenant hotline. The Family Housing Fund matched funding focused on our organizing and advocacy work. Subsequently, HOME Line has secured funding from the Jay and Rose Phillips Family Foundation, the Otto Bremer Foundation, HUD, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, The Minneapolis Foundation, The McKnight Foundation, Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning, and the cities of Plymouth, Eden Prairie, and Minnetonka. The following is a brief description of the programs and activities of HOME Line: Tenant Advocacv (started in January 1992) - HOME Line offers a free call -in or walk -in service providing information and advice on Minnesota tenant/landlord law and on court procedures. This service is managed by Is staff of four experienced housing law attorneys. The tenant advocacy program operates primarily via a lephone "hotline" staffed by the attorneys and volunteers recruited primarily from area law schools. The tenant advocacy program currently handles approximately 5,000 to 6,000 unduplicated cases per year; since start -up in early 1992, over 90% of the more than 45,000 households using this service have been low or moderate income households. Detailed records of each call are kept on a computerized database. Our law student volunteers are given a full -day training program and are supervised by the staff attorneys. As they become more experienced, they may get the opportunity to represent tenants in housing court. We have logged more than 15,400 volunteer hours since starting up the hotline in 1992. Our one -day training sessions are also open to (and well attended by) staff members of other nonprofit and public agencies working with low income clientele. Tenant Oraanizina (May 1992) - Organizing situations often come to our attention through hotline calls. These problems tend to be maintenance /repair related or instances of management abuses. Our tenant organizers help tenants work together to solve common problems. The organizing program also seeks to develop tenant leadership so that those affected can act effectively as spokespeople for themselves and their neighbors. During the past few years, our organizing work has focused on the "preservation" issue. We have spearheaded efforts to organize tenants in 27 federally subsidized apartment complexes when the owners of this housing have announced plans to convert to market rents, threatening the displacement of the low income residents. Tenant leaders working with HOME Line and other state advocacy groups played a major role in securing major state appropriations for preservation in 1998; the Legislature has continued to fund the state's preservation program since. W ourt Advocacv Proiect (September 1993) - HOME Line provides free legal representation to renter families with children who are facing eviction. Services are provided by HOME Line's staff attorneys. The program is Tenant Advocacy in Minnesota HOME Line's Programs for Renters January 2002 • Page 2. funded by and is a part of Hennepin County's "Family Homelessness Prevention and Assistance Program;" as such, its focus is restricted to Hennepin county. Income - eligible families may also receive emergency, one- time loans from CASH's revolving loan fund. Approximately 150 households are assisted per year, most are residents of Minneapolis's northwest suburbs. Since beginning this program, HOME Line's attorneys have prevented 1,179 evictions. Our attorneys' experience with housing cases in Hennepin County has disclosed variation in treatment of these cases between the various branches of District Court. During the summer of 1999, with assistance from the National Association for Public Interest Law (NAPIL), one of our experienced law school volunteers observed more than 400 housing - related cases at Housing Court in the Hennepin County Government Center heard by referees specializing in tenant /landlord law and similar cases at the three "Dale" divisions heard by District Court judges who serve on rotation and generally are less familiar with this area of law. Our report's recommendation to consolidate all housing cases in the downtown Housing Court were implemented at the start of 2002. This change will provide both tenants and landlords more consistent judicial treatment of housing cases. Renter Education Proaram for Hiah schoolers (March 1993) - We have developed a one session program on the "basics of renting" for young people who will be entering the rental market for the first time on their own. Instruction covers inspection before move -in, getting repairs made, potential problems in roommate situations, and the responsibilities of renters. This class has been presented 430 times in 35 different high schools; over 10,200 students have participated. � licv Advocacv (January 1992) - HOME Line has long been an active participant in the public policy arena elating to low income housing issues. We have accumulated extensive data bases on all of the calls to our hotline (over 45,000) which have been used to document to state legislators that changes in the law are needed. One significant example of this was the passage of the Tenants Right to Privacy law in 1997 requiring notice when a tenant's unit is entered by the owner or management. The HOME Line report of hundreds of intrusions into tenants' apartments convinced the Legislature to enact a "reasonable notice" covenant that is now a required part of every lease in Minnesota. Our thorough documentation of the state's inventory of federally assisted housing was a factor in last year's successful preservation funding campaign; every legislator was provided with a report documenting the assisted housing inventory in his or her district. The vote for preservation funding was unanimous in both houses. HOME Line has also been an important voice in the national policy debate over low income housing. Working with allies in national organizations (National Low Income Housing Coalition, National Housing Law Project, National Alliance of HUD Tenants, and the National Housing Trust) Minnesota housing advocates have been at the forefront of national affordable housing policy: in 1999 Congress adopted the "Wellstone Amendment" requiring notice to tenants when owners decide to convert to market. This year, we are continuing our involvement in a national campaign to secure matching federal funding to states, like Minnesota, that put up money for preservation and to establish a National Housing trust Fund. Each year for the past seven, HOME Line has conducted an extensive survey of suburban Hennepin apartment complexes to determine how many apartments qualify for HUD's Section 8 voucher program (rents within HUD limits) and how many of those were in complexes that actually accept Section 8 tenants. Our report has been widely cited here and nationally as documented evidence that tenant -based subsidy programs in tight housing 0 arkets like the Twin Cities do not offer the freedom of locational choice that is at the heart of the voucher ncept (01/02) HOME Line Orcianiational BudIciet for 2002 . approved by_bqar.dJ--1-/ AlOn - -- come -------------- --------- he - cl(Nqht Foundation 125,000 Family ___Homeless Prevention & Assistance Program 30,000! Greater Minnesota Housinq Fund . HUD, _(PEG_Org_p nizin - --- ------- Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 60,000 Phillips Foundation HUD - ( Outreach & Training Assistance Grant) 90,000i Minneapolis Foundation 50,000: Hennepin County/suburban CDBG 70,000 Department of Children. Families and Learning___ Otto Bremer Foundation 20,000 Anti-tobacco research contract 4,500 Funders to be developed 0, --- 2,000 TOTAL INCOME 6,5 Expenses VISTA - housing allowance 2,400 Advertising -- 500:1 Bank fees 500 prVCounty fees -- ------------- 1-10-00. u & Subs Insurance - _General_- - - - 300 Insurance - Health - - -- - ------ 31, - 633 Insurance - - _Worker's_ Comp malpractice__ 3,000 Equip _leases 4.667 Licenses & Permits 900 Meeting Expenses 1,000 Mileage & Parking__ 7,000 -- - - L Pasta e _4,_500 Professional Services 8,400 Rent 26,400 — ---------------- ,Repairs, maintenance & cieaninci 2,200 Seminars & Education Supplies & Printing n Tele hoe & Internet 21 Tele phone ----- --- ----------- 000 Utilities ------ 3090 _Eq 2 Salaries Pension p ex 12, Sul 1 5 47 serves 28.032 TOTAL EXPENSES TOTAL 0 - HOME r p • ® CD Office Phone: 612/728 -5770 3455 Bloomington Avenue Hotline: 612/728 -5767 Minneapolis, MN 55407 Fax: 612/728 -5761 HOME Line Current Donors and Proposals Pending (1102) NOTE: Some of the followino are orants for more, thin one vear or may have time periods that do not match our fiscal vear. so numbe shown in the budget may no t exactly match the figur shown here. SECURED FUNDING The McKnight Foundation $125,000 per year for three years December 2001 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) "Public Entity Grant" for tenant education, training and travel $20,000; May 1, 2000- September 30, 2001 • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development "Public Entity Grant" for staff salaries for tenant organizing $20,000; May 1, 2000 -July 30, 2002 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development "Outreach and Training Grant "( OTAG) $310,000; January 2, 2001 - September 30, 2004 (our contract with HUD is for $450,000 over three years ending in 2004; the remaining $140,000 on our contract is subject to congressional appropriations now pending) Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Tenant Organizing and Education Grant $150,000 over two years; February 3, 2001 - February 2, 2003 The Jay and Rose Phillips Family Foundation General support for hotline expansion to Anoka and Dakota Counties $50,000 one -time grant made December 2000 Otto Bremer Foundation General support for hotline expansion $20,000, one -time grant, March 2001 The Minneapolis Foundation • General funding to support expansion of activities $50,00 per year for two years, April 2001 Tenant Advocacy in Minnesota HOME Line Current Donors and Proposals Pending January 2002 Page 2. The Minneapolis Foundation (Emma B. Howe Memorial Foundation) $37,000 one -time capital grant for office move, July 2001 City of Plymouth - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) $10,000 for tenant services to Plymouth residents; July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2002 City of Eden Prairie - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) $4,000 for tenant services to Plymouth residents; July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2002 City of Minnetonka- Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) $700 for tenant services to Minnetonka residents; July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2002 Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning $30,000 two -year ($15,000 per year) grant for hotline expansion; July 2001 - June 2003 Hennepin County - Family Homeless Prevention Program (subcontract from CASH) Legal representation in eviction cases $30,000 contract; July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2002 S FUNDING REOUESTED. DECISION PENDING Greater Minnesota Housing Fund $25,000 for expansion of services to Greater Minnesota submitted June 2001 The Jay and Rose Phillips Family Foundation $50,000 for general support for expansion statewide submitted December 2001 • Member introduced the following resolution and is moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED USE OF 2002 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS, Brooklyn Center is one of 43 Hennepin County communities which are members of the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has been notified by Hennepin County that its allocation for the 2002 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program is $234,516; and WHEREAS, a public hearing regarding the proposed use of 2002 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds is a requirement of the CDBG Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Mimiesota as follows: 1. A public hearing on the proposed use of 2002 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds will be held at the regularly scheduled Brooklyn Center City Council meeting on March 11, 2002, at approximately 7 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. 2. Staff is authorized and directed to publish the attached Notice of Public Hearing on the proposed use of 2002 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grants funds in the City's official newspaper not later than ten days prior to March 11, 2002. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: ® and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City Council Agenda Item No. 10c • MEMORANDUM TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Tom Bublitz Community Development Specialist DATE: February 5, 2002 / SUBJECT: Resolution of the City of Brooklyn Center Approving Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority's Participation in the Shingle Creek Tower Project The Hemlepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority ( HCHRA) has approved a $400,000 loan to AMCON for the Shingle Creek Tower project through its Affordable Housing Incentive Fund (AHIF). The County's Affordable Housing Incentive Fund is a fund created by the Hennepin County Board to create and preserve affordable housing in Hennepin County. Funds from the AHIF are awarded on a competitive application basis. The State Statute which authorized the creation of county housing authorities requires municipal • approval before the Hemlepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority can participate in a project in a particular city. A resolution approving County participation in the Shingle Creels Tower project is required from both the City and the city's Economic Development Authority (EDA). The resolution included with this memorandum approves the HCHRA participation in the Shingle Creek Tower proj ect in the City of Brooklyn Center. An identical companion resolution is included with the EDA agenda. • e its adoption: Member introduced the following resolution and moved RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER APPROVING HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE SHINGLE CREEK TOWER PROJECT WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority in Resolution No. 24- HCHRA -OlRl has approved the use of a $400,000 Affordable Housing Incentive Fund loan for the Shingle Creek Tower project, contingent upon approval of the project by the City of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, the Shingle Creek Tower project will preserve the supply of affordable housing in the City of Brooklyn Center by preserving 122 rental units. BE IT RESOLVED, that the Shingle Creek Tower project and the participation of the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority in the project are hereby approved. e Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. e City Council Agenda Item No. lOd MEMORANDUM DATE: February 6, 2002 TO: Michael McCauley, City Manager FROM: Todd Howard, City g En ineer SUBJECT: Resolution Accepting Engineer's Feasibility Report and Calling for a Public Hearing, Improvement Project Nos. 2002 -01, 02, and 03, Southwest Area Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements A feasibility report and preliminary design have been completed for the above referenced project. The project was previously established by the City Council on May 23, 2001, and four informational meetings have been conducted with residents and property owners since then. The attached feasibility report provides a detailed breakdown of specific proposed project work items and costs. The total project cost at this time is estimated to be $5,766,000. Funding sources for the project are proposed from a variety of sources as anticipated in the 2002 budget and CIP, and as described in the feasibility report. The 2002 budget provides $3,286,000 for the City's share of street improvement projects. The preliminary estimate of the City's share of the costs for this project is $4,327,000. The preliminary estimate includes a 10% contingency and additional cost savings will be investigated during development of plans and specifications. We believe the budgeted funds will be adequate to cover the costs of the project. Staff have conducted four informational meetings, and have twice sent mailings to all property owners in the area with surveys requesting input from residents on the project and various issues. A summary of the survey responses is attached. The informational meetings were generally positive in nature with the majority of questions and concerns relating to specific construction related issues. Very few of the businesses owners along 48 Avenue were in attendance at the public meetings and only a few businesses returned previously mailed surveys. A new survey was sent to the businesses in order to determine whether the property owners support the proposed improvements. A similar survey was sent to the apartment owners along 47 Avenue. Preliminary results of these surveys indicate a project is not supported on 47 and 48 Avenue. The largest property owner (and assessment payer), Dale Greenwald of Cass Screw, has requested that the project be delayed until after TH 100 is complete. Based on this response. we recommend that the Council nostnone further consideration of improvements on 47 and 48 Avenues until at least 2004. It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution to receive the Engineer's Feasibility Report, to remove 47 and 48 from the project, and to schedule a public hearing to consider approval of the project for February 25, 2002. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2002 -01, 02, AND 03, SOUTHWEST AREA STREET, STORM DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center City Council has previously directed the preparation of an engineer's feasibility report regarding proposed improvements to the streets, storm drainage system, and public utilities in the Southwest Area as described in said report; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed the report prepared by SEH, Inc., and recommends that the proposed improvements be considered, except for the improvements proposed for 47' and 48' Avenues; and WHEREAS, costs have been estimated for these proposed street, utility, and storm sewer improvements; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess a portion of the cost of the street improvements against all properties within the project area, and a portion of the storm sewer improvements within designated sections of the project area; and WHEREAS, the cost to be assessed to the properties is estimated to be: STREET IMPROVEMENT STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT 2002 -01 2002 -02 $1,000,000 $400,000 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. Proposed improvements to 47` and 48`'' Avenues are hereby removed from these projects and postponed until 2004. 2. A public hearing shall be held on the 25th day of February, 2002, in the Training Room at the West Fire Station at 63' Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard to hear and pass upon said improvement project and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by said improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to said improvements. 3. The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of public hearing to be published in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice the total improvement costs. RESOLUTION NO. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. s 3 City of Brooklyn Center Agreat place to start. Agreat place to stay. 6301 SHINGLE CREEKPARKWAY BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 ENGINEERING. 763.569.3340 FAX. 763.569.3494 ENGINEER'S FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR SOUTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2002 -01, 02, & 03 FEBRUARY 2002 I hereby certify that this feasibility report was prepared b e or under my direct supervision, and that I an my Licensed rofessional Engineer under th la s to of Minnesota. Rej�. 246 7 Jo Parotti, P.E. is Februa 7 2002 19 Z- R tewe By Bat OVERVIEW The proposed project includes roadway and utility improvements for the Southwest Neighborhood. The streets included in the project are specifically shown on Figure 1. The project involves pavement rehabilitation and associated drainage improvements, miscellaneous sanitary sewer repair, and selective water main replacement on approximately 3.5 miles of residential streets in the City of Brooklyn Center. The project is generally bounded by 55` Avenue on the north, 47 Avenue and Lakeside Drive on the south, Twin Lakes on the west, and Brooklyn Boulevard on the east. The project includes reconstruction of France Avenue, 53' Avenue North, and Osseo Road (frontage to Brooklyn Boulevard) as part of the City's Municipal State Aid (MSA) system. MSA routes have state gasoline tax money available to assist in funding of the reconstruction. Estimated costs for the new street improvements are included on the attached cost spreadsheet (see Figure 6). This report was prepared in accordance with authorization given by the City Council to address the improvements, costs, and cost recovery. Specific direction was given requesting staff to conduct public information meetings as part of the process. These meetings were conducted on November 27, 28, and 29, 2001 and January 24, 2002. • Feasibility Report 2002 S.W. Neighborhood Page 1 3 City of Brooklyn Center Agreat place to start. Agreat place to stay. 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARK WAY BROOKLYN CENTER, MWNESOTA 55430 ENGINEERING. 763.5 69.334 0 FAX: 763.569.3494 The Southwest Neighborhood improvement project is expected to be combined the Azelia and 50` Street (France Avenue relocation) project from a construction contract basis. The Azelia and 50` Street project is not considered in the following feasibility report because it is a municipal cooperative agreement project between the City and Mn/DOT being funded by state funds and will not be subject to MN 429. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS STREETS The majority of the streets in the project area are local residential streets. They have bituminous surfacing, no curb and gutter, and minimal storm sewer. The project includes France Avenue and 53r Avenue, a collector route designated as part of the City's Municipal State Aid system that conveys surrounding neighborhood traffic to connections at TH 100 and Brooklyn Boulevard. The project also includes 48 Avenue, 47 Avenue, and Dusharme Avenue, which serve industrial businesses in the southern part of the project. Many of the streets were originally constructed in the mid 1950s. Because of the age of the streets, poor drainage and some areas of poor subsurface soils, the streets are in need of rehabilitation to economically improve their service life. The City's Pavement Management Program indicates that routine maintenance will no longer be effective (patch and seal coat). Complete reconstruction is recommended. Soil borings were taken in the project area to determine the types of subgrade materials that would be encountered. This information is used to design the new street section and foundations for pipe materials. Generally, the soils in the project area consist of existing fills that are silty sands and poorly graded sands and alluvium soils that are also sandy in nature. These type of soils generally fall under Mn/DOT classifications for granular borrow and select granular borrow and are suitable for support of the new pavement. However, peat and organic clays were encountered near the corner of Lakeside Avenue and Twin Lakes Avenue. Silty sand and 6.5 feet of wood fill was encountered on Dusharme Avenue, which is a short street located off of 47` Avenue. These soils are not suitable for support of the street and are being recommended for complete removal and backfilled with suitable granular material. For more specific geotechnical information, please reference the Geotechnical report dated June 2001. Traffic volumes on the streets in the project area are typical of residential streets varying from 100 to 500 average daily traffic (ADT). The local residential streets will all be designed to a typical City street pavement section and constructed to a width of 30 feet, allowing for continued parking on both sides. The exception is the MSA route. It currently carries a range of 1600 to 2200 ADT and is projected to carry as much as 3900 ADT in 20 years ... the duration of the design. France Avenue and 53 Avenue will be 32 feet wide. Parking is not be allowed at this width in order to conform with the State Aid rules. 48` Avenue and Dusharme Avenue differ from the typical residential streets due to the increased number of trucks that use the street. The increase loads due to the increased amount of truck use is reflected in the design of a thicker pavement section. A street width of 40 feet is proposed for this street to accommodate maneuvering of the larger size trucks. Concrete curb and gutter and concrete driveway aprons will be installed as part of the improvements. The sidewalk that exists along the east side of France Avenue and the south side of 53r Avenue, along the frontage road to Brooklyn Boulevard, is proposed to be reconstructed as a 10 -foot bituminous trail. This project will also P P include the construction of a 10 -foot bituminous trail in the Twin Lake Park and a 8 -foot bituminous trail along the north side of Lakebreeze Avenue from Twin Lake Avenue to Azelia Avenue. The Twin Lake Park trail will connect to a trail to be constructed by Mn/DOT (as part of the Highway 100 reconstruction project) and to a new parking lot in Twin Lake Park near Twin Lake Avenue and Lakeside Avenue. The existing parking lot at the northwest corner of Twin Lake Park will be replaced under this project. Existing parking provides five parking spaces (one being an accessible space). The new parking lot will provide nine spaces Feasibility Report 2002 S.W. Neighborhood Page 2 3 City of Brooklyn Center Agreat place to start. Agreat place to stay. 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARK WAY BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 ENGINEERING, 763.569.3340 FAX.• 763.569.3494 (one being an accessible space). The new parking lot has been planned to provide additional parking as increased use is anticipated once park improvements are made to the picnic facilities and play structures. The cost estimate prepared for this project includes a lump sum allocation of $ 21,000 to be used for planting replacement boulevard trees. An amount of $ 66,000 has also been allocated for the replacement of street lights impacted by the project. STORM DRAINAGE 1 The existing storm sewer system in the project area is minimal and inadequately drains surface water runoff creating localized drainage problems and standing water. It is the freeze /thaw action of water and ice and subsurface soil saturation that leads directly to deterioration of streets. Each area is proposed to receive drainage system improvements consisting of concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer designed to a 5 -year storm reoccurrence interval. The existing system in the Twin Lakes Avenue area drains directly into Twin Lakes. The challenge for reconstruction of the system in this area is the lack of elevation difference between the street and the lake elevation. A new system is proposed with larger diameter pipe and more catch basins to help alleviate localized ponding. A inline precast sediment collection device is proposed to be installed to help remove large sediments from discharge into Twin Lakes. The industrial area of 47 and 48 Avenues drain to Ryan Lake. The existing storm sewer system is undersized and does not reach the extent of the watershed area. This project will construct new storm sewer system that will provide the needed capacity. The new system will also construct a storm water treatment pond at the corner of 48`� and Dusharme Avenues. The pond will provide treatment and improve the quality of the water that discharges to Ryan Lake. The project will also construct new storm sewer on 47` Avenue, including an in -line precast sediment collection device for water quality treatment. Much of France Avenue and the streets in the project to the north drain to a trunk main that is conveyed under Brooklyn Boulevard. While most all of the storm sewer in the project will be replaced, a 36 -inch diameter trunk located in 53` Avenue will be utilized as a parallel main to add capacity to the system. Figure 3 illustrates the proposed improvements. SANITARY SEWERS The size of sanitary sewers in the project area range from 8 -inch diameter to 15 -inch diameter. A 10 -inch diameter trunk line is located in Lake Breeze and France Avenue and the 15 inch diameter is located in 53` Avenue, which eventually crosses to the east under Brooklyn Boulevard. Almost all of the pipe is made of vitrified clay. There are no capacity problems in the project area, but the television inspection reported there is significant tree root infiltration problems as well as structural defects. In general, approximately 2/3 of the sanitary sewer needs to be replaced. The cost of complete replacement of a main from manhole to manhole has been found to be more feasible in terms of cost and long -term maintenance as opposed to spot repairs in problem areas. Figure 4 illustrates the proposed sanitary sewer repair areas. . WATER MAINS The size of the water main in the project area ranges from 6-inch diameter to 10 -inch diameter. The existing water main in the Twin Lakes Avenue area as well as 47` Avenue is unlined cast iron pipe, meaning that the pipe installed Feasibility Report 2002 S.W. Neighborhood Page 3 3 City of Brooklyn Center A great place to start, A great place to stay. 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARK WAY BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 ENGINEERING.- 763.569.3340 FAX. • 763.569.3494 at that time did not have the corrosion resistant lining typically provided on cast iron pipes in later years. It is the internal corrosion of these pipes over the years that contributes to water quality problems in the neighborhoods. Surveys sent to the neighbors reported water quality issues in this area. Therefore, it is proposed that the unlined cast iron pipe be replaced with cement lined ductile iron pipe as part of the project. In addition, leaky valves and old hydrants are also proposed to be replaced with the project. Figure 5 illustrates the water main locations proposed for replacement. ESTIMATED COSTS AND FUNDING CONSIDERATIONS The total estimated cost for the project is $5,766,040. A detailed breakdown of this estimate as well as funding sources are explained as follows in this report and the attachment. Roadway The estimated cost for the roadway improvements for all streets in the project area (local and MSA) is $3,112,550. If street lighting improvements are included, the estimated cost for those roadway improvements would be $3,178,550. It is proposed to levy special assessments for street improvements in accordance with 2002 rates adopted by the City Council. The rates adopted by the City Council provide for a standard 2002 assessment rate of $2,400 per residential property. Commercial properties are assessed at a rate of $0.29 per square foot. These rates are assessed to all benefitting properties as shown on Figure 1. On this basis it is estimated that special assessments totaling $948,000 would be levied for street improvements. Storm Drainage The total estimated cost for storm drainage improvements for the 2002 Southwest Neighborhood area (local and State Aid streets) is $1,107,260. This includes the cost of storm sewer construction throughout the project area. It is proposed to levy special assessments for storm drainage improvements in accordance with the 2002 rates adopted by the City Council. The rates adopted by the City Council provide for a standard 2002 assessment rate of $790 per family residential unit. The assessment to commercial property will be $0.14 per square foot. The total cost assessed would be approximately $381,000. The storm drainage utility fund would pay for a substantial amount of the remaining storm sewer costs. Storm sewer on France Avenue, 53` Avenue, and Osseo Boulevard is eligible for State Aid funding. Water and Sewer The estimated cost of sanitary sewer replacement and repairs is $756,000. The estimated costs for water main repair and replacement is $724,000. All such costs are proposed to be funded by their respective utility funds in accordance with the established policy for such improvements. SCHEDULE The following is a summary of the proposed schedule for the 2002 Street Improvement Project: February 11, 2002 City Council Receives Feasibility Report & Calls for Public Hearing February 25, 2002 Public Hearing March 4, 2002 Approve Plans & Specifications, Authorize Advertisement for Bids Feasibility Report 2002 S.W. Neighborhood Page 4 3 City of Brooklyn Center A great place to start. A great place to stay. 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 ENGINEERING. 763.569.3340 FAX: 763.569.3494 March 25, 2002 Open Bids April 8, 2002 Award Bid April/May 2002 Begin Construction September 2002 Construction Complete September 2002 Assessment Hearing CONCLUSION The overall condition of the City's infrastructure system (streets and utilities) in the proposed project area is in need of replacement and repair. Based on the information gathered as a result of this study, the proposed solutions and associated costs are considered to be necessary, cost effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. \\spfiles2\co`pdoc \wp \proj ects\ ab \broct \0103\r\2002swneigh.doc Feasibility Report 2002 S.W. Neighborhood Page 5 5 City of Brooklyn Center T [/1111/1 Overview — Project Area r (� V i soo o soo l000 L acde 2 0 feet a > O N J 2 W E s III III I I I 5. 3S( A E <1111H A FIG.1 T N City of Brooklyn Center S T E 2002 Street Reconstruction 5 9 V 500 0 500 1000 u acde 2�teet a > O 'IY 4 N J S W E s u �I I I I S �JL5s A l�A�EIl II L E W EM 48 A MIF I e V y� 7TH AVFI UE FIG. . 2 I`� � �.J City of Brooklyn Center 5 T A E Storm Sewer 5 A V 500 0 500 1000 H u soole 250 feet a I a O v D V 4y N J W E $ S H I5L4 I E H LIIIIH E E W P 18T p ft' Y 4) AMENUE I I a' FIG. 3 T N City of Brooklyn Center 5 5 T E a � Sanitary Sewer 5 r - A V 500 0 500 }000 u scale 2 0 feet a > vOD IIY 4 N J 2 W E _ I l I I I II I LI I I I I I H ,. S u l I 1 5t51� IAiEi i f \ H� CIIIIH ` RE W W i� 19TH A Ht¢ 1 �� V II I I FIG. /� __ 7TH- pYENUE_��� T 5 T N City of Brooklyn Center 5 T A E I Water Main L s e Hydrant Valve V Ll a > 500 o 500 1000 scale 260 feet CD Y ; N a W E // S S l� I IS�SR �AIEIN I I � L 1 W W � _ BATH A F Y ' _ 17THI 1AYEL I ` I �� I I FIG. 5 COSTS & FUNDING - IMP. PROJECT 2002 -01, 02 & 03 SOUTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD -FEASIBILITY SUMMARY ESTIMATED EXPEND_ ITURE STREET SANITARY_ WATERMAIN STORM ESTIMATED SEWER SEWER TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 2,360,500.00 $ 582,700.00 $ 576,600.00 $ 1,006,600.00 $ 4,526,400.00 CONTINGENCY (10 %) $ 236,050.00 $ 58,270.00 $ 57,660.00 $ 100,660.00 $ 452,640.00 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $ 2,596,550.00 $ 640,970.00 $ 634,260.00 $ 1,107,260.00 $ 4,979,040.00 I ADMIN, ENG., LEGAL $ 495,000.00 $ 115,000.00 $ 90,000.00 $ 700,000.00 REFORESTATION $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00 STREET LIGHTS $ 66,000.00 $ 66,000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (FEASIBILITY) $ 3,178,550.00 $ 755,970.00 $ 724,260.00 $ 1,107,260.00 $ 5,766,040.00 ESTIMATED REVENUE STREET ASSESS $ 947,995.38 $ 947,995.38 STORM ASSESS $ 381,311.00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $ 47,000.00 $ - $ 47,000.00 LOCAL STATE AID $ 170,000.00 $ - $ 170,000.00 OTHER GOVT. $ 110,000.00 $ 110,000.00 SANITARY SEWER FUND $ 755,970.00 $ 755,970.00 WATER FUND $ 724,260.00 $ 724,260.00 _ - STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND $ 546,049.00 $ 546,049.00 STREET LIGHT UTILITY $ 66,000.00 _- MSA $ 863,500.00 $ 179,900.00 $ 1,043,400.00 - - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CONST FUND $ 974,054.62 $ 974,054.62 TOTAL EST. REVENUE (FEASIBILITY) $ 3,178,550.00 $ 755,970.00 $ 724,260.00 $ 1,107,260.00 $ 5,766,040.00 FIGURE 6 47' AVENUE th NU & 48 AVENUE SURVEY, Yes, I want the project to proceed and understand that my property will be assessed as a result of the improvements. No, I do not support the proposed improvements at this time. CQMSvLNTS: Should you have questions or need more information, please contact the engineering division at 763 -569 -3340. BERGMANN MACHINE 3420 48TH AVE. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55429 763.535.1500 FAX 763.535.8965 Your name: E -mail: bmworks@msn.com LON ADAMIETZ Address: Please return by February 13, 2002 to: Engineering Division City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 FAX 763 -561 -0955 email thoward @ci.brooklyn - center.mn.us r 47 th AVENUE Yes, I want the project to proceed and understand that my property will be assessed as a result of the improvements. No, I do not support the proposed improvements at this time. ip r^c. ' ± ifJG li(J[L'�M ."JA ti!�, � �'� � /11.7r/► ���� J •'� d t3[Y 3�G.e / �� . '� '7�hin � - � i4 �' a.. 6,� r! � ,o t�� %�• .'S'11�rw lc� C�+�► t-t cirri 1� � 4 / 7 /G b t cr L i .S C°a n Ica Should you have questions or need more information, please contact the engineering division at 763 -569 -3340. • Y01iT' tsame: - -a l57!"EPO1 Cv / cf a"rS 3,GrcdF+'ar /1•%•,� Additss: N0 -C- c l a r Please return by February 13, 2032 to: Engineering Division City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 FAX 763 - 561 -0955 email thoward@zi.brooklyn-center-nm.us -- !NC 9,H ! u� �aJ FEB--08 -2002 09:25 METRO ACCOST 1 CS INC 76397::5272 P.01/01 47" AVENUE & 48 " AVENUE SURVEY "Yes. I want the project to proceed and understand that rn property will be Y P F ,Y assessed as a result of the improvements. No, I do not support the proposed improvements at this tune, C�IVizvtENTS. Should you have questions or need more information, please contact the engineering division at 763 -50 -3340, Your ;Name: Address: ,:�'��) �`'� e . /� Please return by February 13, 2002 to: Engineering Divis City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creak Pkwv Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 FAX 763 -561 -0955 email thoward&i.brooklyn- center,mmus • TOTAL P.01 SOUTHWEST AREA NO. 1 SURVEY SUMMARY RESULTS s m " _ 0 0 3800 -- No Flooding in the No No street sometimes. Water is basement when we have heavy rainfall. '- .:, -, - . , :,v. ...,,. ., .. -�_:.. ... .. . . _ ., �, .... y ,., ; 4 �„ ,, o-,y ., w::x�a:�,., .; . ":. ,° - 5=:: . .z' =, '= .:,�w „� "�r,,�„'".: :.�, .ww;y;� "'� ✓' � -� -, r',�:;'. .q.P'.^ -,,.. • ¢z,. , ,t x; r e ,.,{Y -£ off' � ,rs , .�' "w" -1,' 1';�X y �.''�, ,a:—; .�!;,.. ;�°- ;:,_ey ,d�� a. F �" 3512 -- No Every time we get a No Every time a bus or train goes by, our heavy storm, we whole house shakes. I would say need to manually about a .5 on the Richter scale. Is remove debris there anything that can be done about clogging the grate that? of the storm drain. 3612 Blvd. trees No No No 53 is a busy street. Bridge over Hwy. 100 on France will cause more traffic. 3712 2 pine trees Lines cleaned last No Faucet damage from Large trucks from France are coming year, minerals in water. down 53 They are mostly from warehouse area near the railroad tracks. Would like pine trees removed. ,. ,: OW L,; hs'2 n .dJ2;.7 a'!z.15,, :a3" , 5w';i;; , ,,,'; &s'n „:'- , f.9e,1, , Ti.• z;, �r 4 "1ki4e5 "`" a "� " , ” 1 0 ,r - , ,... .,.,„. -, "- �,.,� '. .. .. M ,. ... r'cv*. n<u ": .r' ar.�„xi�,�,m "�4r' �' �^^" "+"" - ,zr':w,:'Sy - �'�-�-' �: - as' =✓:xr•' .n -< Mr ..a 3501 -- No No No Cars sitting around not being used. Make it look tacky. People with barking dogs. Why was signal at 55 & Old Osseo changed? Have to wait forever to get onto Brooklyn Blvd. 3507 -- No Street floods at Calcium on Need stop sign on corner of 53 Pl. at heavy rain. plumbing fixtures. France Ave. 3519 No No Sometimes storm No Neighborhood is pretty good. sewers flood but that's from debris. 3619 -- Every two years we No It could be better. I have a business in my house. Can have lines cleaned. customers park on street or can they park on France Ave? We have underground sprinklers. 3700 Maple tree Lines cleaned about No No No once a year due to roots. Wh 3619 -- No No y are you so anxious to spe the public's money. Only problem is constant increases in property taxes. 3706 Blvd. tree No No No Street is dark at night. Need midblock street light. 2 "�.,, No <. .�R. INS e0., <„ " : b a. 0 �� . rw .a . ,. 3606 - -No No Some times water I wasn't aware that Traffic signal at 55 & Brooklyn in basement. there was a problem. Blvd., timing has been changed If this is the case, making it harder to cross. I'm concerned about my family drinking the water. 3706 -- Line cleaned twice Water drains No No in last 3 -4 years. improperly to north. Water in basement and yard. . .. .Nyi: ,�"' "e e..s. iAS ::: ".I ��5.i� "`�, ".r:...S fit �µ- „::.',i?.; 1"''e'Yq•. m- "��FV, M I ... rwr /y�y {/�� L /J .. ... ..r „.J �m BLT L � 5455 -- No N No Traffic doesn't stop at sign at 55 & B. Blvd. We should have no turn on red at 55 turning onto service road. ... .. • YE .... .., ...rz- ..Y �. 410 R r'F1S � ,,, . � :-, a .rr 5137 - Has trees roots in -- -- line. ' „ ...: t .. 5:¢ 5042 2 blvd. trees Twice lines cleaned No No Cars and buses sometimes speed on in 12 years. France. 5118 -- Roto Rooter told us No Approximately 2 -3 RR crossing on France near 50”' there is a break times a year we have should be fixed ASAP. between our rust colored water. property line and the main. 5124 No No No No I have underground sprinkler. 3 5137 No No Basement water No No problems after heavy rain. 5330 -- No No No Would this include curb & gutter? 5400 -- No No Heavy truck traffic. f .. Z. Y. 4/1l- .[,'.�[1±!= `�`a.,CIJ"a�` 5306 -- No No No Perfect as is. 5312 No No No No No concerns. 5337 Blvd. trees Moved into house No Water filter turns I need to know if a huge tree is going in 1998. Roto brown after 1 month. to be removed on my blvd. Don't Rooter said there It should last 4 -5 want to spend money on trimming if it were roots in months. Water is going. I would like to move my service. pressure isn't the driveway over to be straight with best. garage. Who should I talk to on this? 5343 -- Have lines cleaned No No No on a regular basis. 5354 2 front yard trees. Line cleaned once a No No Do not put in sidewalks. year. Backup in basement about once a year. 5361 Blvd. trees Some flooding in No No People drive through the poles and basement. onto school lawn. They are lost. Snow plows don't push snow back far enough at the dead end so it ends up in my driveway. 4 .. , � k � . 2. w .. .. �ryr�:�rLY x e r o' u 5349 One tree Lines cleaned about No No No 3 times. 5354 Tree near service. Lines cleaned a The drainage at 50' No No couple of times in and Sailor Lane 38 years. could be better. Water has backed UP. 5 • SOUTHWEST AREA NO.2 SURVEY SUMMARY RESULTS w 4807 -- No —line cleaned 2 No No Lots of traffic /truck traffic due to ill yrs. ago planning of streets. 4819 -- No No Poor quality. Where are the deer? Did you move Extreme mineral them. We don't seem to be having a build -up in water problem this fall. Thank you. heater. Inside back of toilet is black. Bathtubs have orange and brown stains. 4100 -- No No Poor water No quality. Large amounts of sand in water and black debris coming through pipes. F . 4201 #113 -- No No No I'm con cerned about the loss of our entrance from Hwy. 100. Not looking forward to living in a construction zone. When is park going to be done? 4201 #202 -- No After heavy rains No No we frequently experience water in 1 w „ underground garage. :, „ ,w� °S':.: '�,). ... ' ,K �Y �!4 _ _ ✓: ?. 2i! L.ra... rs v« '._:. „' - .4� °Y, , 4201 #216 No No No No No 4201 #306 No No No No My concern is water for drinking and for swimming. How often is water checked for safety? Is it checked more during construction? Can my grand daughter and I go sledding on the sand pile along Hwy. 100? Just kidding. 4201 #308 No No No Manger of Beach Want block watch information. For Condo told me beautification would like Ivy and trees water quality is next to Hwy. 100. Do not like park so poor. close to building because of noise. No public park playground equipment please. Forbid signs for dogs in water and lawn. 4201 #329 -- No Basement Flooding Scum on coffee Too much truck traffic. from water 4207 #122 No No No No Please refer these things to Manager. 4224 -- No Street elevation is Sand residue in Because of No Parking from May 15 higher than laundry tubs and to Sept. 15, there are not enough driveway which every so often parking spaces at Twin Lake Beach creates flooding. brownish tap Park for the general public. Even water. expanding to 8 spaces it will not be enough. __ huge dirt piles going 4040 Yes, once about 5 No No How long are ug p g g to 2 I years ago. be out in front of us on Hwy. 100? 763 -537 -1888. 4704 -- Line cleaned to the No No Concerned about traffic problems once street twice since Lakeside exit is closed. Interested in 1988. landscaping workshop. 4819 -- No No No Seems like yesterday the city worked on roads and sewer here. Things should be good for at least 20 years. I don't see any problems here for streets or sewers. Why not finish Brooklyn Blvd. first so a person can go where they need to go. " .. '.c {,a , y � . , , ':.:" _ .:�,+Ei."'r�"s *d: v.. « .v,s.^,<• - -' -� xx ��c>A'. <.. > q .' wt '�".::i:�":itJ « ".."'��"w,',n «'.;' , fi� =I..4SE` y - •c. 4701 No No No No Storm water runs into lake. Is there some way to prevent cars intending to go north on France from accidentally going west on Lakebreeze? 4752 No No No No No 4753 No No N No No 4759 No No No No With the development of the expanded beach area on South Twin Lake, can the public water craft access be moved to that location? The parking is non- existent. Boats are beached on private property. Users urinate on private property. Late night visitors park in 3 access lane (Lakebreeze) while playing loud music and swimming. If moved to new beach/parking area, City policy could patrol more easily. .,, .ems.; ,,,,, ... - „... mre: '..';uf bb'' p5 ':� e y .. ,�. .. �... _ n _ r .. .�¢ ^f'» f £ �:. _..�.x. ^- ' k,, y' y;, �` :,t3'C;,.:�,;„1'%Y "y,!:.'i,: "wY y- ;nG•.:.y> ., Y i SIN!, 4801 -- No No No Yes for landscaping workshop. Our concern is we don't want sidewalks. Don't want the uptown concept in our neighborhood. 4809 No No Sometimes storm No Appreciate having parking sewer backs up. enforcement on our street. Otherwise we can hardly find places to park ourselves. 4821 No No Low spot by There is a Interested in home remodeling. driveway that problem on the floods. North end of Twin Lake. Main needs to be looped to provide continuous flow. Water quality is poor. 4 SOUTHWEST AREA NO.3 SURVEY SUMMARY RESULTS 3515 No No No No What landscaping will be done with the new access road to our immediate west? What is `block watch" information? > �'� ^l� ^ .. ; ��yF,�Li%� , ,: x l� ^. _ ''�=: ^ ,... .. ^, .. ,c�`"rv:;.,:.a ..� r ?�;.ar ✓..��"t ..e.; � ,�.'�....'ri'��^�'� ,� ; 4645 Blvd. tree within 12 ft. Lines cleaned 10 yrs. No How is water I would like my water tested. I would and yard trees within 1 ago, prior to that every quality defined? like block watch information. I would foot of service. 5 years. like property at 4639 be tested for code violations and health hazards. Area needs a sign informing drivers of children playing. It has become increasing difficult to back out of my driveway because from Hwy. 100 to Lake Drive it has become a racetrack. i„ ya,,,��.sc .. G;.;� '= °',.,?'�; 4800 -- No No No After the Hwy. 100 project and France Ave. we will be able to understand what it will take to look good for the City. I 1 City Council Agenda Item No. 10e City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community • To: Mayor Kragness and Council Members Lasman, Nelson, Peppe, and Ricker From: Michael J. McCauley City Manager Date: February 8, 2002 Re: Discussion of France Avenue Relocation Council Member Peppe raised several issues that he wanted addressed regarding the France Avenue relocation project. Among those issues were: - Will environmental approvals be received prior to irrevocably committing to the project? - Does the project create any City responsibility for abandoned wells or relocated wells? - What happens if there is contamination associated with constructing the roadway? - Is Joslyn released from liability for contamination in the roadway easement ® area? - Is the City assuming some underlying potential liability for the existing contamination? - Why did MnDOT initially indicate that the City should be the responsible governmental unit for the petition to the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board and later agree that MnDOT was the appropriate governmental unit (RGU)? Ms. Spector invited representatives of the MPCA (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency), Minnesota Department of Health, and MnDOT to the February 11` } ' City Council meeting. We did have an opportunity to meet with MnDOT and Tom O'Keefe will be at the meeting. Ms. Spector has met with MPCA and Department of Health personnel, but on Thursday of this week, they advised that they did not have a representative available for the February I I"' meeting. The Department of Health and MPCA indicated that the applications that they are reviewing appear to be in order and likely to be approved in March. The representatives told Ms. Spector that they will be conducting an Open House on March 12 and would answer any and all questions at their forum. Chris Thompson from Geomatrix will be available on the 11`" to review the response action plan and construction process related to the Joslyn site. Attached is a draft memorandum received from Mr. LeFevere. On the second page of the draft, a correction has been inserted reflecting a water main rather than a sewer line and 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 (763) 569 -3400 City Hall & TDD Number (763) 569 -3300 FAX (763) 569 -3434 FAX (763) 569 -3494 L that there is no relocation involved. Mr. LeFevere has not had an opportunity to review • this proposed correction because he is attending a seminar for City Attorneys today. Mr. LeFevere will be available for questions and comment at the meeting on Monday night. Additional information provided for your review with this memo are a memorandum from Ms. Spector, a timeline on this process, and additional information on the VIC program that Ms. Spector copied from the MPCA web site. In reviewing the issues that have been raised, Mr. LeFevere's draft memorandum indicates: - No liability attaches to the City by virtue of an easement for underlying soil conditions. - Joslyn is not released from potential liability in the easement area. - The City is responsible for its construction actions (this is the reason for the response action plan. - The City's risks of having a roadway in this location are not appreciably different than other roadways or public projects. Ms. Spector's memorandum addresses the well issues and conversation with Mr. LeFevere indicate a concurrence in the absence of liability for the relocated or abandoned wells. Mr. LeFevere can address the issue more fully in the final opinion memorandum. o Finally, the overall project status: - May 2002 France /Azelia relocation - July 2002 Railroad bridge relocation cutting off existing France avenue crossing (MnDOT and CP Rail will wait until then to avoid cutting off all crossing the tracks: if the project did not proceed on time there could be period with no crossing available) - 2003 Stage 4 construction: funding will be lost if the project is not let in 2003. • "q\ Approvals /Actions Anticipated/pending Approval Item Approving Agency i Feb. 14, 2002 `aV thin.(] Repl , ,cnt Ilan Sl. i11 <dL Cr. (_bra. Feb. 2.5, 2002 Plans & Specs. France Ave. Project City Council Advertise for Bids France Ave. Project City Council State aid designation /removal City Council Cooperative Agreement vv/ MnDOT City Council Proceed with easements not on Joslyn site City Council acquisition/not use March 12, 2002 MPCA Open House MPC,,A1/Dept. Health March (end) 2002 Response Action Plan MPCA No Association Letter :MPCA April 17, 2002 State approval of France Ave. construction plans MnDOT (or earlief) Action that is determination to construct project: `April 22, 2002 Award contract for France Avenue project City Council May 3, 2002 possession of easements if through eminent domain (Joslyn and others) May 2002 Construction City Council on April 22nd • I 5 • TH 100 Segment 4 and France Avenue Relocation Project History Pre 1990 Periodic review and preliminary design, right of way acquisition, and public meetings; lack of funding prevented completion. January 1990 Technical Advisory Committee and Citizens Advisory Committee formed and begin meeting to prepare and review Scoping Document. Summer 1990 Mn/DOT holds first Open House at Robbinsdale City Hall to review design alternatives. August 1990 BC City Council receives status report, and is dissatisfied with the alternatives presented for the France Avenue interchange. City hires Glen Van Wormer from SEH, Inc. to prepare additional alternates. Fall /Winter 1990 Mn/DOT holds various public meetings. 1 December 1990 City Council approves France Avenue concept developed jointly by SEH and Mn/DOT and asks that it be included in the EIS. 1991 Metropolitan Council approves Scoping Document and authorizes work to begin on the draft Environmental Impact Statement. l 1992 Mn/DOT distributes fliers to affected residents in the four cities advising of the project status, and inviting comments. ) Fall 1992 Third round of public meetings in each of the cities to advise residents of the design and progress. 1994 Highway 100 Council formed to lobby for project funding. Fall 1996 Citizens Advisory Committee meetings, additional public meetings, and • staff and agency discussions regarding the draft EIS. December 1996 BC City Council approves final EIS. November 1998 Final Record of Decision issued by the Federal Highway Administration. February 1999 Mn/DOT Preliminary Design informs engineering staff that the France Avenue design would have to be changed because of 1) the proximity of the France /Lakebreeze intersection to the interchange, and 2) the need to raise the railroad bridge and thus the at grade crossing by 3 -5 feet. Mn/DOT staff suggests an alternative that would relocate France Avenue to the west of the NSP substation and provide an intersection with Lakebreeze at about the racquet club driveway. Engineering staff suggests a more westerly route that would align with Azelia. February 8, 1999 Council reviews and approves aesthetic design of bridges, lights, etc for Segment 4. April 1999 Mn/DOT agrees that an extension of Azelia and 50' Avenue would be a better option. May 24, 1999 BC City Council approves Real Estate Recycling Planned Unit Development and Joslyn site plan, showing the Azelia extension across the site. September 25, 2000 Approval of Phase II of the Joslyn Site. June 12, 2000 Council reviews draft final design, Segment 4. July 19, 2000 Special Council meeting at Northport School, France Avenue interchange design. l July 24, 2000 Council approves segment 4 design but reserves the right to review the • France Avenue interchange. ) July 24, 2000 Council hires SEH to facilitate public meetings and review design alternates. 6 August 29, 2000 First facilitated public meeting to gather public input on potential additional • design options. October 11, 2000 Second facilitated public meeting to review potential design options and gather public reaction. November 13, 2000 Council receives SEH report on 4 design options. November 27, 2000 Council selects the Azelia /50`' extension design option for France Avenue Relocation. December 11, 2000 Council approves Memorandum of Understanding with Mn/DOT regarding construction of the France Avenue relocation design approved 11/27/00. February 26, 2001 Council hires SEH to design France Avenue relocation and Southwest Area Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Project and appropriates $360,000 for this. May 29, 2001 Council establishes France Avenue Relocation and Southwest Area projects. May 29, 2001 Council is updated on status of TH 100 Segment 4 and the France Avenue relocation projects, and directs staff to investigate options for aesthetic improvements to Azelia /50' such as decorative street lighting, fencing, and retaining walls. June 25, 2001 Council approves Phase III of the Joslyn site redevelopment. July 23, 2001 Council approves Segment 4 flap amendment that substitutes the Indiana Avenue frontage road for the 46`' Avenue bridge. August, 2001 City hires Evergreen Land Services to obtain appraisals and acquire real estate. • August, 2001 City hires Geomatrix to prepare the Response Action Plan (RAP). October 8, 2001 Council adopts as one of its 2002 goals the completion of the France Avenue rerouting. December 12, 2001 Council adopts Capital Improvement Program and MSA Fund budget for 2002 including France Avenue relocation. December 12, 2001 Council approves resolution requesting concurrent detachment and annexation of Indiana Avenue frontage road property. December 12, 2001 Council authorizes acquisition of necessary real estate and authorizes condemnation if necessary. Future Council actions: France Avenue Relocation February 25, 2002 Latest date by which the Council could approve plans and specifications & authorize ad for bids so that construction can start by the beginning of May and be essentially complete by July 1. February 25, 2002 Council approves construction cooperative agreement with Mn/DOT. April 22, 2002 Latest date by which the Council could award a construction contract so that construction can start by the beginning of May and be essentially complete by July 1. Future Council actions: TH 100 Segment 4 Summer 2002 Council approves Mn/DOT's final layout for Segment 4. Summer 2002 Council approves construction cooperative agreement with Mn/DOT, ® including appropriating funds for utility relocations. rrT • CHARLES L. LEFEVERE Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337 -9215 email: clefevere @kennedy- graven.com February 8, 2002 Mike McCauley, City Manager City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 Re: Liability for Contamination Associated with France Avenue Relocation Dear Mike: • This letter is in response to your request that I address several questions relating to potential risks and liabilities that may be associated with the City's proposed relocation of France Avenue through the Joslyn site. L BACKGROUND. The City proposes to acquire, by eminent domain, a roadway and utility easement over a portion of the former Joslyn site in the City of Brooklyn Center for the relocation of France Avenue. The Joslyn site was used by the Joslyn Manufacturing Company and its predecessors as a wood treatment facility from the 1920s until approximately 1980. The operations involved the treatment of railroad ties and poles with creosote or pentachlorophenol. Contaminants exist on the site in soils and ground water including polychlorinated dibenzo- p- dioxins /polychlorinated dibenzofurans (dioxins /furans), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and pentachlorophenol (PCP). The site is included as a federal Superfund site and a state Superfund site, although a portion of the site has been removed from the state Superfund list. In 1985, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Joslyn entered into a consent order for the clean up of the site. The MPCA represents the federal Enviromnental Protection • Agency in working with the Joslyn site. Joslyn has undertaken remediation of the site under CLL- 209775v 1 BR291 -10 Mike McCauley, City Manager February 7, 2002 • Page 2 of 7 Minnesota's voluntary investigation and clean up (VIC) program. All of the Joslyn site, except for the west area is included in the VIC program. The remediation of the soils on the site, which has been in progress since approximately 1980, included off -site disposal of soils and treatment of impacted soils on -site. The on -site treatment of impacted soils has been completed, and treated soils have been covered by buildings or pavement areas or three feet of clean soils. Activities to remediate groundwater contamination are still in process. These efforts include a groundwater recovery system, which includes monitoring wells, pumping wells, and a liquid recovery system. The City currently has a sewer waterline in place through the contaminated site 1 orders*^ that this line would be r-eloeated in eenneetion with the pr-oposed r-ealigm:nent of Ffaflee Aven and asseeia4ed utilities The City has submitted to the MPCA a proposed Response Action Plan (RAP) for its project. It is expected that the MPCA will issue a so- called "no association letter" prior to commencement of construction of the project. II. LIABILITY FOR ROAD PROJECT AND RAILROAD CROSSING The City will be exposed to potential liability in the design and operation of the road and railroad e crossing. However, apart from contamination issues, which are addressed later in this letter, the potential liability does not seem to me to be essentially different than the liability to which the City is exposed in undertaking any road project. In this case, plans are being reviewed by a number of other agencies, including the MPCA, Mn/DOT, and the railroad in addition to being designed by the City's consulting engineers. The kinds of risks associated with design and operation of a roadway are generally risks with which the City is familiar. Whenever a City constructs and operates a road, there is the potential that someone injured in using that road will sue the City for negligent design or maintenance of the roadway. The City's liability for these kinds of claims is subject to statutory limits of liability under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466, and the City's liability insurance is designed to be consistent with, and provide the City with coverage within, those limits. III. ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY. Apart from the potential liability normally associated with construction of a road, construction activities and maintenance of a roadway within a contaminated site exposes the City to certain unusual potential liability. This liability arises primarily because of federal statutory provisions in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) first enacted by congress in 1980. 42 U.S.C. Section 9601 et .seg., and similar state law provisions of the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act (MERLA). Minn. Stat., Sections 11513.01 to 11513.24. • CLL- 209775v1 BR291 -10 Mike McCauley, City Manager February 7, 2002 • Page 3 of 7 A. Potential Liability Under CERCLA. Under 42 U.S.C. Section 9607 of CERCLA, the "owner and operator" of a facility are liable for costs of removal or remedial action incurred by federal or state government, response costs incurred by others, and damages to natural resources, among other things, if they are responsible for the release of hazardous substances. Whenever dealing with a site on which hazardous materials are located, the potential of liability being imposed under CERCLA should be carefully considered. In this case, however, there are a number of factors that operate to reduce the risks to the City. These include the following: 1. The MPCA is designated as the lead agency by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. In the case of the Joslyn site, the studies and clean -up of the site have been under the review and supervision of the MPCA for over twenty years. This is significant because the studies conducted during that period of time should provide fairly complete information about the nature and extent of contamination on the site and the geological characteristics of the site. Moreover, the remediation of the site has been underway for many years, and in some respects is substantially completed. Therefore, anyone undertaking an activity on • this site has more information and greater assurance of the response of regulatory agencies than is often the case on a contaminated site. 2. Liability of the City for release of hazardous substances on this site could occur if it were determined that the City fit within the definition of an "owner" or "operator" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. Section 9607. The City does not propose to purchase the site. Rather, it proposes to acquire a roadway and utility easement by condemnation over a portion of the site. The courts have ruled that a mere easement holder is not liable as an "owner" under CERCLA. Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. Acme Belt, W.D. (Mich. 1994), 859 F.Supp. 1125; Lone Beach Unified School District v. Dorothy B. Godwin Livinv Trust, C.A. 9 (Cal. 1994), 32 F.3d 1364; Lincoln Properties, Ltd. v. Hi>?2ens, E.D. (Cal. 1992), 823 F. Supp. 1528. It is possible for an easement holder to be an "operator" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. Section 9607. However, it must be an operator with respect to the handling of hazardous materials on the site. Again, the courts have held that an easement holder does not become liable as an "operator" where the easement holder has insufficient authority to control the operations and decisions of others regarding disposal or storage of hazardous wastes. Grand Trunk (Supra); Long Beach (Supra); Lincoln Properties (Supra). • CLL- 209775v 1 BR291 -10 Mike McCauley, y, y Manager February 7, 2002 • Page 4 of 7 Therefore, with respect to the hazardous substances on the site, the City would not become an owner or operator merely by acquiring an easement, and the responsibility and liability of Joslyn or any other parties who are already responsible for the release of hazardous materials would not be diminished by the acquisition by the City of an easement. The same would be true of the construction by the City of roadway and utilities within the easement. That is, the construction of a roadway would not snake the City an "owner" of the hazardous waste "facility ", nor would it make the City an "operator ". This is not to say that the City cannot be held responsible under CERCLA as an operator for the consequences of its own activities. In other words, if the City simply exercises its rights as an easement holder to construct a roadway in a condemned right -of -way, that fact alone will not make the City responsible as a "operator ". However, the City could theoretically act in such a way as to create liability by taking actions resulting in a release of hazardous substances. For example, if the City were to excavate contaminated soils, remove them from the site, and dispose of them in a way that they were released into the environment, the City would be responsible for the consequences of its own actions. • 3. Under CERCLA, there are a number of defenses to liability. Under 42 U.S.C. Section 9607(b)(iii), the City would not be liable if it could establish by a preponderance of the evidence that any release or threat of a release of any hazardous substances were caused by an act or omission of a third party (such as Joslyn) other than an employee or agent of the City. The City would also have to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the City exercised due care with respect to the hazardous substance and took precautions against foreseeable acts or omissions of any such third party. This defense would not be available if the City had a material contractual relationship with the other party. However, 42 U.S.0 Section 9601(35) provides that a contractual relationship is not established by acquisition of the property by eminent domain. Therefore, even if the City's interest in the easement made it an owner within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. Section 9607, it would not be responsible if it could establish any release complained of was solely due to the act of a third party, such as Joslyn. 4. Finally, responsibility under CERCLA may be allocated among responsible parties. If an action were commenced against the City seeking damages, the City would be able to seek a contribution from another party who is liable or potentially liable, under 42 U.S.C. Section 9613. That section provides that a ".. . court may allocate response costs among liable parties using such equitable factors as the court determines are appropriate." Therefore, even if the City were CLL- 209775v 1 BR291 -10 Mike McCauley, City Manager February 7, 2002 • Page 5 of 7 involved in a suit, if the primary responsibility for any release was the conduct of Joslyn, it is likely that the City would be able to pass that responsibility onto Joslyn by a suit for contribution. B. Potential Liability Under MERLA. Under MERLA, Minn. Stat., Section 11513.03, Subdivision 1, a person is generally responsible for the release of hazardous substances if that person owned or operated a facility when the substance was placed on the facility or located on the facility or during the release. Under Subdivision 3 of the same section, an owner may be responsible if the owner engaged in. for example, generating or disposing of hazardous materials or allowing others to do so or taking action that significantly contributed to the release of hazardous materials. However, as under CERCLA, there are a number of factors that substantially reduce the likelihood that the City would be held responsible under MERLA for merely acquiring a right -of -way or constructing a road. These include the following. 1. As noted above, the MPCA has been involved in the study and oversight of this property for over twenty years. Therefore, there is a good deal of • information available about the site and a track record of response by the MPCA. 2. Mini. Stat., Section 11513.02, Subdivision 11 defines owner of real property as "a person who is in possession of, has the right of control, or controls the use of real property, including without limitation a person who may be a fee owner, lessee, renter, lessor, contractor for deed, vendor, tenant, licensor, licensee, or occupant;..." Although we found no Minnesota cases on the subject, it would seem that the City would not become an owner merely by inquiring an easement interest. Additionally, Minnesota Statutes Section 11513.03, Subdivision 3 provides that "any liability which accrues to an owner of real property under Sections 11513.01 to 11513.15 does not accrue to any other person who is not an owner of the real property merely because the other person holds some right, title, or interest in the real property." Therefore, as in the case of CERCLA, it would appear that the City would not become an owner or operator of the property merely by acquiring an easement. MERLA also provides that a city does not become a responsible person solely as a result of the acquisition of the property through the exercise of eminent domain. Minn. Stat., Section 11513.03, Subdivision 5. ® 3. Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 11513.04, liability under MERLA is limited by the torts claims law, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. Under Section CLL- 209775v1 BR291 -10 Mike McCauley, City Manager February 7, 2002 Page 6 of 7 466.04, Subdivision 1, a municipality is subject to liability for environmental claims only up to $600,000 per claim and $2 million per occurrence. 4. Like CERCLA, MERLA provides for a defense where a release is caused solely by the act of a third party and the defendant establishes that it exercised due care with respect to the hazardous substance concern. Mimi. Stat., Section 115B.04, Subdivision 7. 5. Under Section 11513.03, Subdivision 3, an owner who is not involved in the release of a property but acquires the property at a later date can become liable if the owner knew of the contamination at the time the project was required (which the City would in this case) "... and engaged in action associating that person with the release; . . What conduct might be deemed to "associate" a person with a release is not altogether clear. However, Minnesota law provides a mechanism under which a person may seek to avoid a determination that its conduct "associated" the person with a release. Under the authority of Minnesota Statutes, Section I I5B.175, a person such as the City can apply to the MPCA for a letter to the effect that conduct by the City under a response action plan approved • by the MPCA will not "associate" the City with the release of hazardous substances from the Joslyn site. In this case, the City has submitted a response action plan to the MPCA and expects to secure a "no association letter" prior to commencing construction. 6. As in the case of CERCLA, if the City were sued under MERLA, it could seek contribution from other responsible parties, such as Joslyn. Therefore, there are substantial protections in MERLA for a City that acquires a limited interest in property such as an easement, is not associated with the release of hazardous substances, and proceeds under an approved response action plan. However, these procedures do not excuse a party from the consequences of any releases caused by itself. The City still must exercise due care to prevent releases. to avoid significantly contributing to a release, to assure that it complies with and completes the response action plan, and the like. IV. RISK MANAGEMENT In deciding whether to take an action, such as building a road, decision makers must engage in a risk management exercise in which they weigh the likelihood that an event will occur (such as a release of contaminated materials) and the seriousness of harm if that event does occur against the advantages that are to be gained by constructing a road. First, however, the decision maker should take those steps that it reasonably can to reduce the risks. The risks associated with • crossing a Superfund site should not be taken lightly. The City may not assume liability for the cLL -20977 sv 1 BR291 -10 Mike McCauley, City Manager February 7, 2002 • Page 7 of 7 contamination merely because it acquires right -of -way or constructs a road, and such acts will not relieve others, such as Joslyn, from their responsibilities; however, the road will be through a contaminated area and the City can be responsible for the consequences of its own actions. Therefore, the City will have to be conscious of this fact before, during and after construction, and as long as the road is maintained and operated through the site. A number of steps can be, and have been, taken to minimize the risks to the City. In addition to the defenses noted above, the City has hired consultants, studied the contamination on the site, prepared a response action plan for approval by the PCA, and expects to secure a no association letter prior to commencing construction. As a lawyer, I feel obligated to be somewhat conservative about pointing out risks and liabilities associated with any City activities. However, I also believe that it is important that the liability "tail" not be permitted to wag the public policy "dog ". If the only factor considered in making public policy decisions were the avoidance of liability, the City would not have any parks, roads, or fire departments since all of those facilities or activities can lead to liability for the City. On the other hand, the City should not take on unreasonable risks or unnecessarily create dangerous situations. It is not uncommon for cities to become involved in remediating, or otherwise dealing with contaminated sites. The City's past redevelopment activities have involved the City with • underground storage tanks, dry cleaning contamination and asbestos removal during demolition. The Council must determine whether the remaining risks associated with the contaminated site are at a reasonable and acceptable level given the benefits resulting from construction of the roadway project such as improved circulation and emergency vehicle response times. Very truly yours, Charles L. LeFevere CLL:ams CLL- 209775 v 1 BR291 -10 • MEMORANDUM DATE: February 7, 2002 TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Diane Spector, Director of Public Work 1 SUBJECT: Staff Report RE: Status of linprovement Project No. 2002 -04, France Avenue Relocation At the February 25, 2002 regular Council meeting the Council will be asked to take several actions on Improvement Project No. 2002 -04, France Avenue Relocation: approve the plans and specifications and authorize advertisement for bids; approve execution of the construction cooperative agreement; transfer MSA designation from the existing France Avenue to Azelia/50 and approve a standard No Parking resolution. These actions are necessary to keep this project moving toward construction beginning about May 1. Prior to taking those actions the Council has requested additional information regarding liability potential for that part of the project that will cross the Joslyn site, and the status of the various approvals still necessary before the contract can be awarded. Liability Potential • The attached letter from City Attorney Charlie LeFevere provides his opinion regarding potential liability. In summary, by acquiring a road easement and constructing a road, the City does not acquire liability for the underlying contamination. However, the City is responsible for the consequences of its own activities. In other words, the City would be responsible for any contamination released during construction or in future years while undertaking maintenance or reconstruction. As described below, the purpose of preparing a Response Action Plan is to have a pre- approved plan for mitigation in place should contamination be released. Mr. LeFevere's letter also details various statutory liability limitations or other means of relief. Status of Approvals City Engineer Todd Howard and I along with our consultants met with representatives of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the Department of Health (MDH) on February 7, 2002 to review our submitted Response Action Plan (RAP) and the proposed construction plans. Chris Thompson from Geomatrix will be available at the Council meeting to answer any questions about the RAP. In reviewing the plans all parties agreed that there were only a few instances where utility work could potentially impact contaminated soil, and that in general the road construction will not impact contaminated soil. In much of the portion on the Joslyn site, road construction will actually add more cover in the form of clean fill, class 5 base, and pavement and over the three feet or more of fill already on site. The MPCA has reviewed and agrees with the methods laid • out in the RAP for dealing with any contaminated soils. 2 • In general, the MPCA has determined that this RAP is consistent with others that have been prepared and approved for this site. They asked that the RAP section on exposure assessment be updated to include all the soils correction work that has been completed on site since the MPCA risk assessment was completed. Geomatrix will update this and include a figure that shows that the entire site is now covered with at least 3 feet of clean soils, buildings, pavement, or clay pond liner. The MPCA, MDH, and Geomatrix have concluded that in risk assessment language, "the risk pathways are broken." With the RAP updated to include this information and some additional work requested by Barr Engineering relating to the wells, the MPCA has said they intend to approve the RAP. As a last step in the process, prior to receiving formal approval, the MPCA and MDH will hold an Open House to explain the current status of the risk assessment with interested parties. That Open House is tentatively scheduled for March 12. Following that meeting, we will receive formal approval of the RAP and the No Association letter. The wetland replacement plan was presented to the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission, which acts as the LGU for Brooklyn Center on wetland matters. The watershed engineer recommended the plan for approval as it meets WCA requirements, but the Commission chose to table action pending additional information. The Commission requested its engineer to obtain from the MPCA written verification that the mitigation site (which is north of the railroad tracks and is not on the Joslyn site) is not contaminated by the Joslyn site. The engineer has received written confirmation of from the MPCA that they have no evidence of • contamination north of the tracks, and we expect the watershed to approve the wetland replacement plan February 14. We will undertake additional soil borings in the area of the wetland mitigation prior to its construction. Outside the Joslyn site, we have also undertaken Phase I and Phase II environmental studies of the Xcel site, and have submitted a VIC program application for that part of the project as well. Additional Questions The following brief question and answer section responds to questions asked previously. Will we have environmental approvals before the project starts; before we acquire the property. Construction work may not begin on the project until the Response Action Plan is approved by the MPCA. No wetland excavation or fill may be conducted until the Shingle Creek WMO approves the wetland replacement plan. The project starts when the construction contract is awarded, which is scheduled for Council consideration April 22, 2002. Prior to then, the Council will need to take actions such as approving the plans and specifications; authorizing the ad for bids; amending the MSA system to remove the MSA designation from France Avenue south of 50 and adding it to AzeliaJ50 and passing a No Parking resolution. These are actions that are necessary to keep the project on its timeline, but that also can be "undone" if necessary. We expect to have all the environmental approvals prior to April 22. However, we will not have all the approvals before the Council needs to consider these intermediary actions. 3 The timeline for the project is outlined below. The Council is scheduled to award the project • April 22. If the environmental approvals were not obtained by that time, the Council would have sufficient time to either amend the plans so they are approvable or to simply withdraw from the bidding process and not award a contract. Also, under the condemnation proceedings filed to acquire the right of way, the City would take possession May 2 (2 parcels on May 8). Negotiated purchase may make some right of way available before that time. Simply acquiring the property does not obligate the city to construct the project; if the project does not go forward it can be reconveyed to the property owner. Who is responsible for the pollution once the road is built? By law the Joslyn Corporation is liable in perpetuity. The City would only acquire liability if it causes the existing pollution to be released without mitigating it, or causes new releases. The Response Action Plan (RAP) details actions that will be taken during construction to assure that either there are no releases, or if there are releases they are handled in accordance with required procedures (such as removing material off site to a licensed disposal facility). This is similar to the situation the County and through the construction cooperative agreement the City has on Brooklyn Boulevard in the area of the Pilgrim Cleaners Superfund site. In that case, even though Pilgrim Cleaners no longer owns the property at 69 and Brooklyn Boulevard, it remains responsible for the pollution and ongoing monitoring and remediation. Acquiring the parcel and building a part of Brooklyn Boulevard and the turn lane to 69 Avenue over that Superfund site does not cause the county nor the City to become liable for that release unless during the Brooklyn Boulevard construction contamination was released. What is the res onsibilit or abandoned and relocated wells? P Y.f Separate from the roadway project, two wells in the proposed right of way will be abandoned. They will be reestablished outside the right of way. Abandonment will be completed by a licensed contractor in accordance with established Department of Health procedures routinely used in abandoning wells. Reestablishment of the wells will again be completed by a licensed contractor in accordance with established procedures and the RAP. The City does not take on any responsibility for these wells. What happens if there is contamination from construction? That is the purpose of the Response Action Plan (RAP), which spells out construction procedures and mitigation methods to be taken if contaminants are encountered during construction. If for example contaminated soils were encountered, the RAP is a pre- approved plan of how the contractor is to remove it (including how workers are to be protected if they have to handle the soil), and to where it is to be removed. It is the responsibility of the contractor (who is being monitored by the City's environmental consultant) to assure that he is following the required procedures. If contamination occurs because the procedures were not followed, it is the responsibility of the contractor to mitigate that contamination. Is Joslyn released from responsibility where the road is built? Is Joslyn still liable? This is discussed more fully in the City Attorney's opinion. Under CERCLA and MERLA, Joslyn is responsible for the contamination on the site in perpetuity, except for any releases • caused by the City during or after construction. Joslyn remains liable for any residual 4 • contamination within the roadway easement. The Joslyn Corporation has reviewed the RAP and has provided to the MPCA and the City its written acknowledgement that the RAP is consistent with Joslyn's Consent Order and its Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants. In other words, the Joslyn Corporation has said the road work is acceptable in the same way construction of the Wickes and Phase II and III buildings were acceptable, and constructing the roadway in accordance with the RAP will not exacerbate the contamination. When the petition for an EAW /EIS was submitted to the EQB, why did Mn /DOT at first object to being named RGU but soon after changed its mind and agreed to be RGU? A specialist in Mn/DOT's Central Office's Office of Environmental Services, who was not familiar with the history of the project, prepared the initial response to the EQB's determination. When Mn/DOT was requested by City staff to review its response, it was reviewed by the Metro District Office, which was responsible for the project. The reviewers there were more familiar with the project and agreed that due to the unique nature of this case Mn/DOT should be the RGU. Mn/DOT is a very large organization, with a Central Office handling many administrative and policy issues and eight District Offices handling projects and day -to -day issues. Because of the sheer number of projects statewide, information about unique details of projects may not be as available to the Central Office as to the District Office, which is apparently what happened in this case. Can we be sued for pollution on the site? By the public, or by Joslyn? This is addressed in the City Attorney's opinion. The circumstances under which the City could be successfully sued by the public or by Joslyn are limited and the potential liability is small, • although it is real. The City is not liable for, and by acquiring an easement and building the roadway does not accrue liability for, the underlvini� contamination. To document that, we have requested and are in the process of obtaining a No Association letter from the MPCA. However, it cannot be said with absolute certainty that the City could not be sued and found liable if by building or operating the road it causes a release of contaminants. This is why the City has hired an experienced consultant to prepare a Response Action Plan. The project specifications will also require that only contractors who have experience working in these types of areas and have the required state certifications and training may bid on that part of the project. These are steps that have been or will be taken to control and minimize risk and potential liability. Project Status The following table shows the timeline and status of some outstanding issues. Additional routine items requiring Council action February 25 include passing a No Parking resolution, and adjusting the MSA system. The No Parking resolution is a routine item. MSA designation will be taken off France from 50 to Lakebreeze, and from 50 from France to TH 100. Designation would be added to Lakebreeze from France to Azelia; Azelia from Lakebreeze to 50 and 50 from Azelia to France Avenue. We will also remove the designation from the half of France Avenue south of TH 100 that will be annexed to Robbinsdale. Also on the agenda will be approval to execute the construction cooperative agreement with Mn/DOT. • i • • ® 5 Status of France Avenue Relocation Project February 11, 2002 Status Pending Issues Info rmation Expected O utcome s Plans and Have received preliminary Minor changes Plans must receive Feb 25: Approve P &S, ad for bids, specifications review from Mn/DOT requested by Barr final MSA approval no Parking resolution, transfer Municipal State Aid (MSA) Engineering by April 17 (bid MSA designations opening) March 8: ad appears, plans available April 17: open bids April 22: award contract Construction Being drafted by Mn/DOT Must be executed Feb 25: Council approves cooperative before city can be execution agreement reimbursed for expenditures to date Wetland Presented to Shingle Creek Tabled in order to get Watershed engineer Application will be approved at Feb replacement WMO in January; tabled until written assurance from has received written 14 WMO meeting plan approval February MPCA that no confirmation from contamination from MPCA there is no Joslyn exists in wetland evidence of mitigation area contamination Response Submitted to MPCA; Minor changes Staff meeting with Approval by end of March Action Plan ' concurrence received from requested by MPCA; MPCA and DOH approval Joslyn Corp; MPCA and MPCA/DOH will hold Feb 7; MPCA will DOH have reviewed Open House tentatively likely approve after on March 12 Open House Right of way Offers made to all; Possession will be taken May 2 on condemnation proceedings some and May on the remainder8 have been filed France Avenue Relocation Project • Milestones, January-May, 2002 January February March April May Plans and specifications State Aid preliminary review Council approval Prepare final bid package Bidding process Open bids Award bids — Start construction Construction cooperative agreement Draft prepared by Mn /DOT Council approval Wetland replacement plan ® Review by watershed - Approval by watershed Response action plan Review by MPCA Public informational meeting Approval by MPCA No Association letter Right of way Offers made Condemnation filed Possession taken by • MPCA - Selected VIC Success Stories Page 1 of 9 _ Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Program Minnesota ollution Selected VIC Success Stories • Control Agency µ How does the MPCAR. Voluntary �r�ts Investigation and,.:> Cleanup (VIC) = I a ry Program work? The ; following success r `" stories illustrate sites om� at which private and ' °" •� public development ow. -- ' projects were undertaken or jobs created or preserved through timely assistance from the VIC Program. Since 1988, the VIC Program has provided assistance to approximately 1,200 voluntary parties. Arlington- Jackson. St. Paul Red Wina Publishing, Red Wing- BayportWildlife Management Area. Richfield Redevelopment, Richfield _Bayport • Chaska .Flood _Control Proj_ect,__Chaska Rid ery_iew Business_Park, St. Paul Enron TBS, Minnesota Sawmill Run, Minneapolis Honevwell. St. Louis Park SPS Corporation, St. Louis Park Jae's_Precast. Stacy Stern_. Rubber Com an.y,..Stap]_es Montgomery Wards,_St.._Paul Texaco,St .._Paul Northeast Retail, Minneapolis Unocal Site /Lilvdale Park, St. Paul Old .. _, M innetonka _Dulnp,_Minnetonka Urban_ Ventures /Homefi_eld Park N: *collet. Clinic .Expansion, _St.. Louis Victor Fluid Power, Granite Falls Park Plymouth. - Avenue Apartments,_Plymouth Wiletzsky,_._M nrneapolis Precision Site, Brooklvn Center Arlington- Jackson, St. Paul The St. Paul Port Authority has development plans for at least 22 acres of this underdeveloped property, a 69 -acre site historically made up of salvage and scrap yards and a local eyesore. In March 1997, the St. Paul Port Authority received a Certificate of Completion from the MPCA for this area, clearing the way for plans to build an industrial park. The site consisted of low marsh areas filled with petroleum, lead and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Contaminated soils were removed and • the volatile organic compound (VOC) levels were reduced to the point where they were no longer considered hazardous. A single Certificate of Completion was issued for the site, although the site will be split into parcels and tenants of all parcels will http: / /www.pca.state -nm.us /cleanup /viestories.html 2/4/02 MPCA - Selected VIC Success Stories Page 2 of 9 reap the benefits. The neighborhood welcomes the changes that the St. Paul Port • Authority is making in the area, and has wanted to develop this area for years. The property will be aesthetically improved; in fact, the Willard Munger bike trail which will link Duluth with downtown St. Paul, will run through the site. The development will also create light manufacturing jobs for local residents. Bayport Wildlife Management Area, Bayport The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) completed a cleanup of a 245 -acre parcel of DNR -owned land in Bayport with the assistance of the VIC Program. The property had been used by a correctional facility for disposal of wastes from a prison from the late 1930s until the mid- 1970s. Under an MPCA - approved response action plan, the wastes, including foundry wastes, solvents, metal scraps, petroleum waste and building materials were excavated, characterized in the field and segregated for appropriate disposal or treatment. The MPCA staff soon anticipates issuing a Certificate of Completion. The cleanup and the liability protection provided by the Certificate will allow the DNR to sell the property to Andersen Windows for the construction of a major new manufacturing plant in close proximity to its present facility in Bayport. Chaska Flood Control Project, Chaska The Army Corps of Engineers, in constructing a flood - control project on the Minnesota River at Chaska, discovered that the construction was adjacent to and partly within the boundaries of the former Chaska City Dump. In November 1992, ® before proceeding with further construction, the Corps performed an investigation approved by the VIC Program to determine whether hazardous substances were present in the dump at levels that posed a threat to public health or the environment. The investigation showed that only low levels of contamination were present. Based upon the investigation, the VIC Program in April 1993 informed the Corps that no further investigation and no cleanup action were required for the project to proceed. Enron TBS, Minnesota Northern Natural Gas approached the VIC Program proposing to clean up multiple locations, known as Town Border Stations, where mercury spillage had occurred over years of maintaining mercury - bearing meters. While the company had long since discontinued the use of this type of meter, residual mercury contamination was known to exist at some percentage of Town Border Stations where barometer -type meters had been employed historically. The application was received by the VIC Program on August 23, 1993. By October 1993, Northern Natural Gas and their consultant were conducting the removals at the Town Border Stations where mercury exceeded the action level of 14 parts per million (ppm) in soils (2 ppm if there was a nearby surface water body). A No Action letter was issued to Northern Natural Gas on February 11, 1994, for the 32 locations. Honeywell, St. Louis Park • Honeywell's Avionics Facility in St. Louis Park was investigated with oversight. from the VIC Program, and PCB - contaminated soils were found. Honeywell worked with Ryan Construction (Ryan) to clean up the contaminated soils. After receiving http: / /www.pca.state.mn.us /cleanup /vicston*es.html 2/4/02 i MPCA - Selected VIC Success Stories Page 3 of 9 assurances from the MPCA through the VIC Program that Ryan would not be associated with the release, Ryan purchased the property. Without this assurance, • Ryan could have been at risk to incur liability for the contamination. Currently, the land is being developed into a shopping center, which includes such anchor stores as Home Depot and PetSmart. The center will also house offices for the Arby's Corporation. Putting this property into productive use will benefit the community and create many local jobs. Jae's Precast, Stacy On July 20, 1994, the MPCA Conunissioner issued the first full Certificate of Completion for the Jae's Precast, Inc., property located in Stacy. Jae's Precast, Inc. is a manufacturer of concrete pipes and culverts. The current owners, L.W. Makens and Diana M. Makens, purchased all shares of Jae's Precast, Inc. from the previous owners on June 7, 1991. On November 12, 1991, Julian Trangsrud, General Manager of Jae's Precast, Inc., requested assistance from the VIC Program after discovery of buried drums and visually contaminated soils south of a production building. Subsequent investigations identified a variety of buried wastes including wood, concrete rubble, metals scrap, tires, crushed drums and batteries. Although the owners did not own the property when it was originally contaminated, they removed and properly disposed of all on -site contamination because of their deep belief in proper land stewardship. The Certificate of Completion, and an accompanying agreement for ongoing response actions, provides liability protection to the owners, successors, lenders and other parties not responsible for the • contamination at the site. Montgomery Wards /Midway Marketplace, St. Paul The Montgomery Wards Company entered the VIC Program in January 1991. Montgomery Wards had conducted an extensive environmental investigation of its property in anticipation of the construction of a major new shopping complex. The environmental investigation revealed four areas that were contaminated with petroleum and VOCs. The MPCA Tanks and Spills Section staff reviewed and approved Montgomery Ward's proposals for corrective action for four petroleum release areas. Based on the environmental investigation, Montgomery Wards determined that the VOC release was originating somewhere off -site, and was most likely due to a release from a dry cleaning shop in an adjacent shopping center. The MPCA staff issued a No Action letter to Montgomery Wards in June 1991 for the VOC release. Montgomery Wards requested an Off -Site Source Determination, which the MPCA staff issued in April 1994. The Land Recycling Act also allowed the MPCA to include in the April 1994 letter, a No Association Determination for all of the parties involved in the new development project, giving them additional liability assurance with respect to the VOC release at the property. The liability assurances issued by the MPCA allowed the property to be developed into a major retail center and contributed to the economic redevelopment of the Midway area of St. Paul. • Northeast Retail, Minneapolis http: / /www.pca.state.=.us /cleanup /viestories.html 2/4/02 MPCA - Selected VIC Success Stories Page 4 of 9 The site, located on the former Johnson Street dump (in operation between the 1930s • and 1950s) lies in a prime development area off I -35W. The Minneapolis Community Development Agency (MCDA) purchased the 42 -acre site in 1993 and began by seeking support from neighbors for their ideas to build a shopping center at the site. During investigation, the site was divided into two parcels for the purpose of processing the assurances. The main part of the dump was located on the west parcel and contained (among other things) VOC and PCB - contaminated soils. The east parcel contained paint waste and coal slag. An "on- call" active methane collection and monitoring system will be installed on the west side of the site, along with a soil vapor extraction system to deal with VOC sources. A passive methane monitoring system will be placed on the east side. The voluntary parties are seeking Certificates of Completion from the MPCA for both portions of the site. The site has presented its share of environmental, geotechnical and timing challenges, but MCDA, Ryan Construction, the MPCA and others involved have worked together and done an excellent job of identifying and overcoming all barriers. A retail center for North Mimneapolis has now been built and is the new home for Rainbow, Target, Home Depot, TCF Bank, PetSmart, a video store, and other retail stores. This new development has increased the city's tax base and created many jobs in the community. Old Minnetonka Dump, Minnetonka Also known as Hedberg Estates or Cedar Pass, this 90 -acre uncontaminated area was difficult to develop because it was located near the Old Minnetonka Dump. The • wooded property was otherwise prime real estate. The dump, which had been in the VIC Program since 1988, was a wetland filled in with lead -acid batteries. The contamination in the dump was excavated and stabilized, and a three- layer cap was placed on the site making it ready for development. Hedberg redeveloped the wooded property as Cedar Pass, a neighborhood of 37 maintenance -free "villa homes" that start at around $375,000, plus 50 traditional homes that are expected to range in price from $425,000 to more than $1 million. The voluntary parties are seeking a Certificate of Completion for the dump portion of the site and a No Action Agreement for the other portion. This new development substantially increased the city's tax base and prevented taxpayers from having to pay for the cleanup of the site. Park Nicollet Clinic Expansion /Tower Place Redevelopment, St. Louis Park This project involved an expansion of the Park Nicollet Medical Center campus, including a new medical office building, retail center and restaurants on the Tower Place property, and anew medical building adjacent to the existing clinic building. Additional medical clinic expansion is anticipated in a second phase of construction by 2004. The existing clinic is located on the site of a former solid waste dump. Through two separate agreements among past and current owners of the clinic property and the MPCA, response actions are being taken by the owners to contain ground water contamination, remove the lightly acidic waste, and monitor and control emissions of methane from the old dump area. Once response actions are • completed, the new owners and others entitled to liability protection under the Land Recycling Act will receive a Certificate of Completion which will address potential environmental liability r bihty p oblems and help ensure on-going financing of the project. http: / /www.pca.state.mn.us /cleanup /vicstori es.html 2/4/02 MPCA - Selected VIC Success Stories Page 5 of 9 • Plymouth Avenue Apartments, Plymouth Prior to its development as low- income residential apartments and townhomes in 1973, the property had historical uses including automobile servicing stations and dry cleaning facilities. Starting in November 1993, the buyer of the site requested assistance from the VIC Program in two stages. Initially, the buyer of the site and financial backers received a No Association determination on December 19, 1993, that provided protection from state Superfund liability for acquisition of the site. Subsequently, the buyer, committed to providing high quality housing to low- and very low- income residents of the community, would recondition the thirteen buildings containing 140 rental units using $4,000,000. To complete the rehabilitation, the buyer pursued a Section 241 loan through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). To obtain the loan, HUD required that the buyer investigate the extent and magnitude of contamination discovered during the initial site assessment. The VIC Program approval and guidance of the investigation ultimately led to issuance of a No Action letter for contaminants at the site. This letter allowed the project to proceed under financial assistance from HUD, and quality, low income housing to be available to the community. Precision Site, Brooklyn Center Owners of an active commercial roofing company located in Golden Valley wished to expand their business to Brooklyn Center. After locating a prospective property, it was learned that the site was previously owned by an electronic • products /transformer manufacturing company that allegedly dumped chlorinated solvents on site. The roofing company worked together with the electronics company to purchase the property and improve its value. The new owners entered the VIC Program on May 13, 1996. Because they were well prepared, the roofing company was able to receive assurances from the VIC Program by June 6, 1996, protecting them from liability for the contamination. These assurances enabled the roofing company to complete its purchase of the property. The current owners are further investigating the site. Red Wing Publishing, Red Wing Solvent contamination was discovered in 1992 during geotechnical investigation of property where Red Wing Publishing was planning to build an addition to its newspaper printing plant. Construction of the addition was on a tight time schedule. The company obtained quick approval of a voluntary cleanup plan involving excavation and land application of some contaminated soil and an in -place bio- venting system to treat and remove contamination from remaining soil. As a result of the speedy assistance from the VIC Program, the building addition was completed on schedule in Fall 1992. Richfield Redevelopment, Richfield CSM Corporation (CSM) entered the VIC Program in July 1994, seeking assistance • with three phases of development spanning an area approximately six city blocks in Richfield. Ground water in the area has been contaminated with solvents from a dry cleaner which was formerly located in the proposed development area. On August 5, http: / /www.pea.state.nm.us /cleanup /vicstories.html 2/4/02 MPCA - Selected VIC Success Stories Page 6 of 9 1994, CSM received a No Association determination from the MPCA in order to • begin construction on a large retail project (which will boast a new pilot Best Buy store — the largest in the United States). CSM is also in the process of obtaining an Off -Site Source Determination for the first phase of development. As the development progresses into the next phase, response actions will be necessary. These response actions will result in the issuance of yet another legal assurance, most likely a Certificate of Completion to CSM, and the cleanup of significant contamination. Riverview Business Park, St. Paul Several commercial buildings were being purchased by a developer who intended to repair the debilitated foundations and lease the space to a variety of tenants. The floor slabs of the buildings were badly askew as a result of differential settlement of fill materials in the State Street Dump, on which the buildings were constructed. The dump had been added to CERCLIS (a federal inventory of known or suspected waste sites) in 1989 as a result of a Screening Site Investigation which showed that ground water was contaminated by heavy metals. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contamination also has been associated with the dump. In order to complete the transaction, a No Association determination was sought by the seller to apply to the buyer and the buyer's lenders; however, the closing date had been established and the parties expressed an urgency for the deal to be completed within that specific time frame —just six weeks from the date the • application was received. Fortunately, VIC Program staff had the flexibility to make the site a priority and were able to meet the schedule imposed by the business transaction. Sawmill Run, Minneapolis The Minneapolis Community Development Agency (MCDA) received the state's first partial Certificate of Completion under the Minnesota Land Recycling Act on May 18, 1994, for the cleanup of the Sawmill Run property. This downtown Minneapolis property was formerly the site of a coal gasification plant and other industrial operations. The MCDA entered the VIC Program in September 1991. Response actions were completed by September 1992, at which time more than 23,000 tons of contaminated soil and 40 barrels of paint and solvents were removed and treated or disposed of The cleanup action also included the recovery of petroleum floating on the water table and ground -water monitoring to assure that contamination levels decrease over time and do not affect the Mississippi River. The $1.3 million cleanup paves the way for a $12.1 million upscale redevelopment project which includes riverfront townhomes. SPS Corporation, St. Louis Park The SPS Corporation is a plumbing supply wholesaler that wanted to stay on its seven -acre property in St. Louis Park, but needed to replace or update many of its • 1920s buildings. However, the ground water under the property was affected by a nearby Superfund site, Reilly Tar and Chemical. After an investigation by the . company, the VIC Program issued an Off -Site Source determination letter to the http: / /www.pca.state.nm.us /cleanup /vicstories.html 2/4/02 MPCA - Selected VIC Success Stories Page 7 of 9 SPS Corporation in Fall 1993. The letter allowed the company and its lenders to receive the necessary liability protection to undertake the development of a $3.5 million office warehouse facility. Stern Rubber Company, Staples p Stern Rubber Company is a manufacturer of rubber products. The manufacturing plant was formerly owned by American Rubber Products, a company based outside Minnesota. In 1992, American Rubber proposed to shut down the Staples plant and move to an out -of -state location. The plant manager, Terrell Stern, proposed to purchase the plant and keep it in operation, saving 60 -80 jobs associated with the plant. However, contamination of soil and ground water at the site threatened to prevent the financing of the purchase. Stern sought the assistance of the VIC Program in January 1992. In March, a site investigation was completed and a cleanup plan was submitted to the MPCA for approval. The plan was approved in April 1992, in time for financing of the sale of the plant to be approved and the jobs preserved. Cleanup under the approved plan includes excavation and treatment of contaminated soils, and pumping and treatment of contaminated ground water that had been migrating toward off -site residential wells. Texaco, St. Paul This 41 -acre site was operated as a bulk petroleum storage facility from 1951 to 1983. Seventeen above - ground storage tanks were dismantled in 1988 -89 under the direction of the MPCA Tanks and Spills Program. Texaco entered the VIC Program ® in 1993 to obtain legal assurances for future buyers. Investigations identified several different petroleum releases from above - ground tanks and pipelines on the site. After cleanup, the St. Paul Port Authority purchased the site and began construction on the Crosby Lake Business Park in Fall 1996. Tenants include EMC Corporation, Twin City Tile and Marble and Summit Brewing Company. Unocal Site/Harriet- Lilydale Regional Park, St. Paul This property is the former site of a Unocal Corporation bulk storage facility where soil and ground water was apparently contaminated as a result of releases from above - ground tanks. Contamination includes volatile organic compounds. The City of St. Paul is incorporating this property into a planned $46 million expansion and improvement of the Harriet - Lilydale Regional Park, including new docks, marina, playground areas, walkways, bike paths and a Mississippi River interpretive area. Unocal requested assistance from the VIC Program to determine the scope of the contamination problem and the appropriate cleanup required for the site. The VIC Program approved a pilot vapor extraction system to test whether this technology was a feasible method to remove the contamination. Based on the success of the pilot, a full -scale system was proposed and implemented in 1993. Urban Ventures /Homefield, Minneapolis This site was comprised of several vacant urban lots located in the heart of • Mimneapolis in an area with a long history of commercial and industrial use. Urban Ventures, a nonprofit community organization, wanted to purchase the property. Working together with the Redevelopment Grant Assistance Program, Urban i http://www.pea.state.mn.us/cleanup/vicston*es.html 2/4/02 MPCA - Selected VIC Success Stories Page 8 of 9 Ventures received approximately $30,000 in public and private funding and pro bono work to complete an environmental investigation and to receive written • assurances from the VIC Program, which limited liability associated with the purchase of contaminated property. This partnership allowed Urban Ventures to direct limited resources to the development of services that benefit the community rather than spending those funds on legal and technical problems. They purchased the property and transformed the site into athletic fields for an underpriveledged youth program called "Homefield." Victor Fluid Power, Granite Falls Victor Fluid Power intended to sell its business and property to another company that would likely continue the same type of activities on the property. An investigation was done to find out if there were environmental problems at the site. There was a problem: a chrome plating dip tank process had caused contamination at the site. Because of the problems that this process caused, it was shut down, cleaned up and closed. A new, more enviromnentally- friendly process was implemented and the new owners received a No Association letter from the MPCA. The MPCA is working with the new owners to complete the property investigation and cleanup. The owners are seeking a Certificate of Completion from the MPCA and have already completed some soil and ground water investigatory work. This partnership allowed for continued operation of the facility in Minnesota, saving many jobs for this small town of 3,000. • Wilensky, Minneapolis The Minneapolis Community Development Agency (MCDA) was eager to revitalize an area made up of an auto parts salvage yard and various vacant properties along north Washington Avenue. MCDA demolished the salvage yard building, completed an investigation and removed soil contaminated with lead and petroleum from the site. Because this site was cleaned up, Microtron Manufacturing, an auto electronic- component manufacturer, was interested in purchasing this property. Funding from the Department of Trade and Economic Development and a No Action letter from the VIC Program was enough incentive for Microtron to purchase the property and begin operation at the site. Microtron Manufacturing's move to this revitalization area increased the net tax base in Minneapolis by $100,000 and created 114 jobs for the community. Microtron also anticipates the creation of an additional 49 jobs over the next four years. The economic growth and aesthetic improvements to this area are encouraging other neighborhood businesses with environmental issues to enter the VIC Program. Search I Index I Glossary I Ask MPCA I Home This document was last reviewed May 15, 1001 If you have suggestions on how we can improve our service to you, please drop us a note. If you have questions or problems, contact webmaster(a�pca.state.mn.us • For more information about Minnesota, visit the Northstar Web site. MPCA, 520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155 -4194 Phone: 651- 296 -6300, 800 - 657 -3864; 24 -hour emergency number: 651- 649 -5451 or 800 - 422 -0798 http://www.pca.state.mn.us/cleanup/vicstories.html 2/4/02