Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002 05-13 CCP Regular Session AGENDA CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION May 13, 2002 6:00 P.M. West Fire Station Training Room 1. City Council discussion of agenda items and questions 2. Watershed Planning Session May 23rd 3. Miscellaneous 4. Adjourn City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community To: Mayor Kragness and ncil Members Lasman, Nelson, Peppe, and Ricker From: Michael J. McCauley City Manager Date: May 8, 2002 Re: Watershed Commission Planning Session: May 23rd The attached communication from the Watershed Management Commissions details information regarding a May 23` meeting regarding watershed issues. The item is on the agenda for discussion of City participation in that discussion and discussion of the issues identified in the letter. I . 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway • • • Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 (763) 569 -3400 City Hall & TDD Number (763) 569 -3300 FAX (763) 569 -3434 FAX (763) 569 -3494 WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSIONS 3001 Harbor Lane • Suite 150 • Plymouth, MN 55447 Telephone (763) 553 -1144 • Fax (763) 553 -93 April 29, 2002 Dear Mayor/Manager: As you know, the Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions are in the process of jointly developing their Second Generation Management Plans, and have been making good progress. The Commissions and their Technical Advisory Committee have identified a number of policy - related issues to discuss with elected and appointed officials regarding the Commissions' organizational structure and the cities' water quality philosophy. To that end, the Commissions invite you to a policymakers' planning session on Thursday, May 23, 2002, noon -3:00 p.m. Please invite whomever you believe would be appropriate to attend this meeting. - - - - - - ----------------------------------------- Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Second Generation Management Plan Policymakers' Planning Session Thursday, May 23, 2002 Noon -3:00 p.m. - - - -- Lancer at Edinburgh, 8700 Edinbrook Crossing, Brooklyn Park, MN Prior to the meeting you will receive a packet of information regarding the proposed new goals, policies, and objectives for the Second Generation Plan, as well as issues already identified for discussion. Examples of some of the policy issues are: t Should the Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Commissions be merged to form a single joint powers commission? + Should the Commission take on more of a leadership role in the ten cities promoting water quality and environmental issues? + What are the highest priority environmental and water quality issues in the ten city area? + Where are the cities on the water quality spectrum — very aggressive, bare minimum, or somewhere in between? + Is there a role for the watershed in preparing the NPDES Phase II permits and completing the annual reports? + Should the Commission take on a more active role in protecting and restoring "watershed significant" water resources, and how should significance be defined? ♦ Should the Commission take on water quality construction projects, including ownership, operation, and maintenance? SHINGLE CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION BROOKLYN CENTER • BROOKLYN PARK • CRYSTAL • MAPLE GROVE • MINNEAPOLIS • NEW HOPE • OSSEO • PLYMOUTH • ROBBINSDALE WEST MISSISSIPPI WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION BROOKLYN CENTER - BROOKLYN PARK • CHAMPLIN • MAPLE GROVE • OSSEO Mayors/Managers April 29, 2002 page 2 We hope you can join us for lunch and the planning session; but if you are not able to attend, please feel free to send representatives in your place. Enclosed with this letter is an update on the status of the Second Generation Planning process to share with your Council, Commissions, and staff. If you have any questions please feel free to contact Diane Spector, Steering Committee Chair, at Montgomery Watson Harza, 763 -585 -5268. Sincerely, Diane Spector / a Shingle Creek and West Mississippi WMO Second Generation Plan Steering Committee Chair Cc: Agencies SC /WM Commissioners SHINGLE CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION BROOKLYN CENTER • BROOKLYN PARK • CRYSTAL • MAPLE GROVE • MINNEAPOLIS • NEW HOPE • OSSEO • PLYMOUTH • ROBBINSDALE WEST MISSISSIPPI WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION BROOKLYN CENTER • BROOKLYN PARK • CHAMPLIN • MAPLE GROVE - OSSEO Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions g PP g Second Generation Plan - April, 2002 Status Report The Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions have spent the past several months identifying issues, reviewing standards, and discussing future goals and directions for the coming ten years. The Steering Committee and Technical Advisory Committee are preparing for meetings in May and June 2002 with policy makers and elected officials and with the general public. It is the Commissions' goal to have a draft of the Second Generation Plan complete by mid summer to begin agency review. The Second Generation Plan is being developed as cities are beginning to develop their NPDES Phase 11 permits and storm water management plans. The Plan and supporting documentation are being developed with the intention that cities may use relevant parts of the Plan as part of their required storm water management plan and permit submittal. The following is a synopsis of findings and activities to date and proposed future directions by management area. Some of the proposed future activities are required by governing agencies, and some would be new initiatives of the Commission. Water Quantity The first generation management plan was concerned mainly with controlling the quantity and flow of storm water. Much of this was accomplished by requiring the construction of stormwater detention and treatment ponds for all development and redevelopment of certain sizes and by protecting stormwater storage sites, such as the Palmer Lake Basin and Twin Lake -Ryan Lake. The Commissions' Engineer has completed a hydrologic model of the watershed and has established several monitoring stations along Shingle Creek. Few significant flooding problems have been identified, although there are some localized issues of concern to member cities. Some issues remain with Crystal and Ryan Lakes. For the Second Generation Plan, the Commission's proposed goal is simply to maintain the existing system, continuing the policies requiring control of discharge rates, construction of detention facilities, and protection of storage areas and adherence to approved local plans. Water Quality Water quality was a lesser issue during the development of the first plan than it is today. That plan promoted generally the reduction in pollutants with special concern regarding protection of wetlands and groundwater recharge areas and established a monitoring program. Pollution prevention has primarily been achieved through the construction of stormwater detention and treatment facilities and controlling discharge into wetlands. Some monitoring has been accomplished in the watershed over the past several years, in most of the lakes in the watershed and in Shingle Creek. In general the monitoring has found that the lakes range in quality from good to poor, and that Shingle Creek is typical of urban streams in that it also ranges in quality from good to poor. Shingle Creek has been identified as an Impaired Water due to the levels of chlorides in the Creek in the early spring, and the Commission has, with the help of a $100,000 grant from the MPCA, begun a "TMDL study" to better define the problem and propose solutions. The Second Generation Plan is proposed to focus on maintaining nd improving water quality in th g P g q n' e ten -city area. It is ro osed to increase the a P P mount of water uali q ty monitoring, and to be more active managers of water quality. This would be accomplished through capital projects intended to reduce or eliminate structural sources of pollution and education of property owners to reduce or eliminate other sources of pollution such as fertilizers, pesticides, and waste. A first step has been taken with the receipt of a $14,000 Metro Environmental Partnership Grant promoting water quality best management practices (BMP's) on residential property in the Twin Lakes subwatershed. Recreation, Fish, and Wildlife Protection of habitat was an objective of the original plan, but the Commission has not in the past taken an active role in protecting and promoting recreational, fish, and wildlife uses of water resources; it was primarily to be accomplished through the protection of water quality. The Second Generation Plan proposes a more active role for the Commission. Long -term attainable use would be determined for each water resource, and a plan developed suggesting how it would be protected or improved. Greenway corridors would be promoted and habitat areas would be identified and protected or improved. Member cities along the Mississippi River would be encouraged to achieve the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRAA) Tier II voluntary management standards to preserve and improve recreation and natural resources. The Commission as a partner with the Minneapolis Park Board was selected for a Metro Greenways Planning Grant. This project will develop a comprehensive natural resources plan along Shingle Creek from 53` Avenue North south to the Mississippi River. Public Participation and Education The Commission has not in the past had an active public participation and education management component. For the Second Generation Plan, the Commission proposes a more extensive outreach effort: actively providing educational materials to cities for use in their publications; promoting activities such as the Great Shingle Creek Watershed Cleanup; maintaining a website; and holding an annual evening meeting to review progress towards goals with the public and to obtain public input. Groundwater A key component of water resource management is to protect groundwater quality and promote groundwater recharge. Several of the member cities rely on groundwater for their drinking water. The first management plan simply promoted the concept of groundwater recharge and suggested the Member Cities protect groundwater recharge areas. The Second Generation Plan would add a requirement that developments and redevelopments that are large enough to require a project review are required to infiltrate part of the stonnwater enerated on site. The Commission mmission would also so encourage and promote management and development strategies that promote infiltration and sustainable development. Wetlands The Wetland Conservation Act (WCA governs most wetland development o ment activities. The p first management plan promoted t g p p he protection of wetlands generally. The Second Generation Plan proposes to manage wetlands more actively by: identifying priority wetlands for preservation and improvement; requiring buffer strips between wetlands and new development; and undertaking "functions and values" analyses. Erosion and Sedimentation The first plan simply required erosion control measures for all projects requiring project reviews. The Commission proposes to add in the Second Generation Plan policies promoting shoreland management, streambankrestoration, and lakescaping as means to reduce erosion and sedimentation. J:\CLIENTS\ S\SHINGLEC\2ndgen\Policy\status.doc I Public Copy CITY COUNCIL MEETING City of Brooklyn Center May 13, 2002 AGENDA 1. Informal Open Forum With City Council - 6:45 p.m. - provides an opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda. Open Forum will be limited to 15 minutes, it is not televised, and it may not be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with citizens. Questions from the Council will be for clarification only. Open Forum will not be used as a time for problem solving or reacting to the comments made but, rather, for hearing the citizen for informational purposes only. 2. Invocation — 7 p.m. 3. Call to Ord e Order Regular Business Meeting -The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. 4. Roll Call • 5. Pledge of Allegiance 6. Council Report 7. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda -The following items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at the end of Council Consideration Items. a. Approval of Minutes - Council Members not present at meetings will be recorded as abstaining from the vote on the minutes. 1. April 22, 2002 - Study Session 2. April 22, 2002 - Regular Session b. Licenses C. Approval of Sunday Liquor License for Duoos Brothers American Legion Post 630, 6110 Brooklyn Boulevard, in Conjunction with Club License • d. Approval of Summary on City Council Retreat CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- May 13, 2002 C. Resolution Accepting Bid and Awarding Contract, Improvement Project Nos. 2002- 05, 06, and 07, Garden City South Street, Storm Drainage and Utility Improvements f. Resolution Accepting Bid and Awarding Contract, Improvement Project Nos. 2002- 01, 02, and 03, Southwest Neighborhood Street, Storm Drainage and Utility Improvements g. Resolution Authorizing Execution of an Easement with Canadian Pacific Railway h. Resolution Authorizing Execution of an Easement with Brookdale Christian Church i. Resolution Declaring a Public Nuisance and Ordering the Removal of Diseased Trees 8. Appearance a. Superintendent Chris Richardson, Osseo School District 9. Public Hearing a. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 7 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter -This item was first read on April 8, 2002, published in the official newspaper on • April 17, 2002, and is offered for second reading and public hearing. -Requested Council Action: -Open the public hearing. -Take public input. -Close the public hearing. - Motion to adopt ordinance. 10. Council Consideration Items a. Proclamation Declaring May 28, 2002, To Be "Orchard Lane Elementary Day" and "Willow Lane Elementary Day ", in the City of Brooklyn Center -Requested Council Action: - Motion to adopt proclamation. b. Proclamation Declaring May 12 -18, 2002, as Police Week - Requested Council Action: - Motion to adopt proclamation. C. Proclamation Declaring May 19 -25, 2002, Public Works Week in Brooklyn Center -Requested Council Action: - Motion to adopt proclamation. • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- May 13, 2002 s d. Resolution Recognizing Albert Hartmann in Recognition and Appreciation of His Dedicated Service to the City of Brooklyn Center -Requested Council Action: - Motion to adopt resolution. e. Resolution Expressing Appreciation for the Gift of the Brooklyn Center Lions Club in Support of Arbor Day Activities - Requested Council Action: - Motion to adopt resolution. f. Resolution Expressing Appreciation for the Gift of the Brooklyn Center Fire Relief Association in Support of the Adopt- A- Park/Trail /Street Program -Requested Council Action: - Motion to adopt resolution. g. Resolution Declaring Earle Brown Days as a Civic Event From June 27 Through 30, 2002 -Requested Council Action: - Motion to adopt resolution. • h. Resolution Amending the Schedule for Sign Permit Fees -Requested Council Action: - Motion to adopt resolution. i. Resolution Accepting Bid and Authorizing the Purchase of One 1500 GPM CAF Fire Apparatus Pumper and Transferring Additional Funds From the Fire Department Central Garage to Provide the Additional Funding to the Purchase of the Fire Apparatus -Requested Council Action: - Motion to adopt resolution. j. Resolution Authorizing Application for an Opportunity Grant Through the Livable Communities Demonstration Program (Planning Grant for Northbrook Shopping Center) - Requested Council Action: - Motion to adopt resolution. k. Cancellation of May 20, 2002, Worksession -Requested Council Action: - Motion to cancel May 20, 2002, Worksession. • 11. Adjournment City Council Agenda Item No. 7a • MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION APRIL 22, 2002 WEST FIRE STATION — TRAINING ROOM CALL TO ORDER STUDY SESSION The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session and was called to order by Mayor Myrna Kragness at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Myrna Kragness, Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Ed Nelson, Bob Peppe, and Tim Ricker. Also present were City Manager Michael McCauley and Assistant City Manager Jane Chambers. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF AGENDA ITEMS AND QUESTIONS The Council inquired regarding the status of the proclamations for Orchard Lane Elementary Day • and Willow Lane Elementary Day. City Manager Michael McCauley advised that the items would be redrafted to indicate May 28, 2002, as a single day of recognition for Orchard Lane Elementary and Willow Lane Elementary. Councilmember Lasman had made arrangements to notify school personnel that the item will be on the agenda. Councilmember Peppe inquired regarding item 7c, Resolution Holding the State of Minnesota Harmless for a Variance From State Standards, of State Aid Operations, 53` Avenue North/Old Osseo Road Improvements, State Aid Project No. 109 - 114 -01. Mr. McCauley stated that the Council had previously authorized applying for a variance from State Aid Standards on 53` Avenue North and that the variance request had been approved. As part of the variance process it was required that the City hold the State harmless from the standards on this State Aid route. Councilmember Lasman inquired with respect to whether the speed limit would be posted to reflect the 22 miles per hour design of the curve. Mr. McCauley indicated that the posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour would not change, but that he anticipated that a similar advisory sign to the one that is currently at the curve would be erected indicating an advisory speed reflective of the design of the curve. The current advisory sign indicates a recommended speed of 15 miles per hour. The road will be designed at 22 miles per hour. Councilmember Nelson inquired regarding agenda item 8c, Resolution Prescribing Voting Precincts and Designating Polling Locations for the City of Brooklyn Center, and the timing of those designations. • 04/22/02 -1- DRAFT Mr. McCauley responded to Councilmember Nelson's question describing the process that occurred S between the determination of the boundaries in March and the presentation of the polling precincts in which the City Clerk had to review a large amount of materials and find appropriate public spaces that could be used for polling places in light of the information received towards the end of March. Councilmember Nelson indicated that he did not feel that the title of agenda item 8e, France Avenue Connection Project, was an accurate description of the project. Councilmember Nelson indicated that he felt a description that was to provide access to the Highway 100 project would more accurately reflect the nature of the project rather than calling it a connection for France Avenue. Councilmember Nelson also discussed the outline of action dates attached to Todd Howard's memorandum. PROSECUTION SERVICES REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS It was the consensus of the Council that prosecution services would not be put out to a request for proposals in 2002. CARL NEU'S REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL RETREAT Councilmember Nelson discussed the wording in Goal 8. Mr. McCauley responded that the appendix containing the 2002 City Council Goals were those adopted by the City Council in the fall of 2001. The appendix did not reflect any actions taken at the January Council Retreat, but rather were attached simply for reference. MISCELLANEOUS Councilmember Nelson discussed street light utility charge and comments that he had received from the public indicating that some people may not fully understand that the charge is quarterly and not monthly. Councilmember Nelson inquired regarding the time capsule event on June 30, 2002. Mr. McCauley indicated that the Earle Brown Days Committee was responsible for the time capsule event. The City will be working with the Earle Brown Days Committee regarding the grand reopening of the facility. ADJOURNMENT A motion by Councilmember Lasman, seconded by Councilmember Peppe to adjourn the Study Session at 6:33 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. City Clerk Mayor • 04/22/02 -2- DRAFT • MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION APRIL 22, 2002 WEST FIRE STATION — TRAINING ROOM 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum at 6:47 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Myrna Kragness, Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Ed Nelson, Bob Peppe, and Tim Ricker. Also present were City Manager Michael McCauley, Assistant City Manager Jane Chambers, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Recording Secretary Laura Beck. Diane Niesen, 5107 East Twin Lake Boulevard, addressed the Council and requested clarification • regarding Council Members views on the issue of routing a street across the Joslyn superfund site. Ms. Niesen had written Council Members an e -mail and requested responses. Wayde Lerbs, 5107 East Twin Lake Boulevard, addressed the Council indicating his concerns with the information that has been presented regarding the street project and Joslyn site. Brian Berger, 3937 51' Avenue North, addressed the Council and stated that he will continue to protest the street and its endangering of species. Ms. Niesen stated that she is mad along with others. She believes the Council has sold them out and asked the Council to withdraw their support for option number two. She discussed that she was confused by the agenda and asked the Mayor the proper time to address the issue. Mayor Kragness responded that the issue could be discussed at the Regular Meeting under the related agenda item and requested that all questions be addressed to the Chair during the meeting. ADJOURN INFORMAL OPEN FORUM There was a motion by Councilmember Lasman, seconded by Councilmember Peppe to adjourn the Informal Open Forum at 6:55 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. • 04/22/02 -1- DRAFT 2. INVOCATION • Mayor Kragness offered a moment of silence. 3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session and was called to order by Mayor Myrna Kragness at 7:00 p.m. 4. ROLL CALL Mayor Myrna Kragness, Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Ed Nelson, Bob Peppe, and Tim Ricker. Also present were City Manager Michael McCauley, Assistant City Manager Jane Chambers, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Recording Secretary Laura Beck. 5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 6. COUNCIL REPORT Councilmember Nelson reported attendance at the following events and information for the Council: • • April 11, 2002, ARM Meeting • April 13, 2002, Brooklyn Center Prayer Breakfast. He stated that Joel Downer had done an excellent job organizing the event and that next year it will be held May 3, 2003 • April 28 through May 4, 2002, had been proclaimed concern in Churches • May 2, 2002, is National Day of Prayer • April 16, 2002, Earle Brown Days Meeting • April 18, 2002, Meeting at Cross of Glory Church and a Chamber of Commerce Meeting • April 19, 2002, Brooklyn Center Fire Appreciation Dinner • April 20, 2002, he participated in the Shingle Creek Clean -up. He discussed that 200 pounds of trash had been collected and a celebration was held in Crystal. He also helped plant trees and urged everyone to help plant a tree in honor of Earth Day. Councilmember Ricker reported that he attended a Housing Commission meeting on April 16, 2002, at which there was a good discussion of changes to the rental housing ordinance and a possible revision to the recreational vehicle parking restrictions. 04/22/02 -2- DRAFT O i ® Councilmember Peppe reported that he attended the Park and Recreation Commission Meeting on April 15, 2002. Civic Center renovations and the proposed land swap with District 286 at Grandview Park were discussed, as well as discussion of the three possible types of skate parks that can be constructed. Councilmember Lasman reported that she had attended many of the same events as Councilmember Nelson. She noted the 12th Annual Police Awards Ceremony would be held April 24, 2002, and urged citizens to attend this event that honors hometown hero's. She also noted the Crime Prevention Golf Tournament will be May 17, 2002. Mayor Kragness noted that she had attended many of the already mentioned events and that the up coming 12` Annual Police Awards Ceremony event would take place at the West Fire Station with registration at 6:30 p.m. and the Ceremony at 7 p.m. 7. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA There was a motion by Councilmember Lasman, seconded by Councilmember Peppe to approve the agenda and consent agenda as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 7a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • There was a motion by Councilmember Lasman, seconded by Councilmember Peppe to approve the minutes of the April 8, 2002, study and regular sessions. Motion passed unanimously. 7b. LICENSES A motion by Councilmember Lasman, seconded by Councilmember Peppe to approve the following list of licenses. Motion passed unanimously. MECHANICAL Air Corp. 13821 Industrial Park Boulevard, Plymouth Associated Mechanical 1257 Marshall Road, Shakopee General Sheet Metal Corp. 2330 Louisiana Avenue North, Minneapolis Heating & Cooling Two, Inc. 18550 County Roadd 81, Maple Grove Knight Heating & A/C 10413 61 st Street NE, Albertville LBP Mechanical 315 Royalston Avenue North, Minneapolis Louis DeGidio Inc 21033 Heron Way, Lakeville Marsh Heating & A/C 6248 Lakeland Avenue North, Brooklyn Park P & D Mechanical Contractors 4629 41 st Avenue North, Robbinsdale Pearson Mechanical Service 5630 Memorial Avenue North, Stillwater Pierce Refrigeration 1920 2nd Avenue South, Anoka St. Marie Sheet Metal Inc. 7940 Spring Lake Park Road, Spring Lake Park • 04/22/02 -3- DRAFT MOTOR VEHICLE DEALERSHIP • Brookdale Dodge 6800 Brooklyn Boulevard Brookdale Metro Mitsubishi 7235 Brooklyn Boulevard Iten Chevrolet 6701 Brooklyn Boulevard Luther Brookdale Chrysler Jeep 6121 Brooklyn Boulevard Luther Mazada 6700 Brooklyn Boulevard RENTAL Renewal: 1425 55th Avenue North HCM Investments 1807 70th Avenue North Rebecca Thomley 6025 Brooklyn Boulevard Dorothy Ostrom - Ringstrom 5301 Dupont Avenue North James & Melanie DeBellis 5351 Irving Avenue North HCM Investments 5547 Lyndale Avenue North David Theisen Unity Place Townhomes CHDC Limited Partnership TAXICAB Mohammed Barry 910 Lynde Drive NE, Fridley James Ledlum 6808 Candlewood Circle, Brooklyn Park 7c. RESOLUTION HOLDING THE STATE OF MINNESOTA HARMLESS FOR • A VARIANCE FROM STATE STANDARDS, OF STATE AID OPERATIONS, 53" AVENUE NORTH/OLD OSSEO ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, STATE AID PROJECT NO. 109 - 114 -01 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -52 Councilmember Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION HOLDING THE STATE OF MINNESOTA HARMLESS FOR A VARIANCE FROM STATE STANDARDS, OF STATE AID OPERATIONS, 53 AVENUE NORTH /OLD OSSEO ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, STATE AID PROJECT NO. 109 - 114 -01 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Peppe. Motion passed unanimously. 7d. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR THE TWIN LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -53 Councilmember Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: • 04/22/02 -4- DRAFT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR THE TWIN LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Peppe. Motion passed unanimously. 8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS 8a. PROCLAMATION DECLARING MAY 13 THROUGH 20, 2002, AS D.A.R.E. AWARENESS DAYS Mayor Kragness read the proclamation. A motion by Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Lasman to adopt Proclamation Declaring May 13 through 20, 2002, as D.A.R.E. Awareness Days. Motion passed unanimously. 8b. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR VOLUNTEER SERVICE TO NORTH HENNEPING MEDIATION PROGRAM INCORPORATED RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -54 • Councilmember Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR VOLUNTEER SERVICE TO NORTH HENNEPING MEDIATION PROGRAM INCORPORATED The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Peppe. Motion passed unanimously. 8c. RESOLUTION PRESCRIBING VOTING PRECINCTS AND DESIGNATING POLLING LOCATIONS FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER City Manager Michael McCauley outlined the changes in the precincts due to the closing of Orchard Lane and Willow Lane Schools and the recent re- districting of the State. RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -55 Councilmember Nelson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PRESCRIBING VOTING PRECINCTS AND DESIGNATING POLLING LOCATIONS FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER • 04/22/02 -5- DRAFT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember • Lasman. Motion passed unanimously. 8d. MAYORAL APPOINTMENT TO HOUSING COMMISSION Mayor Kragness requested ratification of Mary Barrus, 5441 Camden Avenue North, to the Housing Commission. A motion by Councilmember Lasman, seconded by Councilmember Nelson to ratify Mary Barrus, 5441 Camden Avenue North, with term expiring December 31, 2002. Motion passed unanimously. 8e. FRANCE AVENUE CONNECTION PROJECT 1. FINALIZATION OF QUICK TAKE OF EASEMENTS 2. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A CONSTRUCTION COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2002- 04, FRANCE AVENUE RELOCATION 3. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A PROJECT COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2002 -04, FRANCE AVENUE RELOCATION • Mr. McCauley reviewed the permits that had been approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for the project. He also reviewed with the Council the approval from Watershed Management Organization of the wetland mitigation, but noted that an appeal had been filed to the Board of Water and Soils Management. Tom O'Keefe from Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) updated the Council on the anticipated date for letting the contract for Stage 4 of the Highway 100 Project: October 25, 2002. Mn/DOT anticipates being at the 100 percent plan stage for Stage 4 in June of this year. The Canadian Pacific Railroad Bridge is under construction and ahead of schedule. Councilmember Nelson expressed concerns about the proposed connection across the Joslyn site. He reviewed the history of his opposition to the alternate chosen based on his view that there were better alternatives and funding for those alternatives had not been fully explored. Diane Niesen, 5107 East Twin Lake Boulevard, reviewed the history of the discussions and her opposition to the selected alternative. She inquired regarding the de- watering for the railroad bridge construction and raised concerns about the status of reports by Barr Engineering on de- watering issues. 04/22/02 -6- DRAFT • Mr. O'Keefe discussed that Mn/DOT tries to avoid de- watering as part of the ongoing operation of a roadway. De- watering was one factor in Mr/DOT's decision making about Stage 4, as was the clearance on the bridge where more than one truck has hit the bridge that is lower than required standards. The need for a wider bridge also affected design issues and alternatives. Nancy Dillion, 5444 East Twin Lake Boulevard, thanked Councilmember Nelson for his position on the prof ect. She did not feel that quality of life issues were addressed and believes that the quality of life in the area would deteriorate due to driving through an industrial area to get to the neighborhood. Paul Oman, 5239 East Twin Lake Boulevard, expressed his opinion that the railroad crossing was hazardous and challenged the accuracy of the data presented. He also believed that the Murphy Warehouse might become a total taking. Councilmember Ricker responded to Mr. Oman's concerns regarding accuracy, noting that several agencies had looked into and approved the project. Tom Mathisen, Chair of the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Organization, described how the project had followed sequencing requirements and that the mitigation plan met requirements. Councilmember Nelson asked Mr. Mathisen about his regular job. Mr. Mathisen responded that he was the City Engineer for the City of Crystal. . Roni Brunner, 4701 Twin Lake Avenue, took issue with some of Mr. Mathisen's comments about the neighborhood's concern for the wetland. Ms. Brunner indicated that the neighbors cared about the lake and the wetland. Mr. Mathisen responded to Ms. Brunner's comments. Wayde Lerbs, 5107 East Twin Lake Boulevard, spoke about the importance of the lake and its use for many recreational purposes and the integral part the wetlands play in the lake. Ms. Niesen thanked Councilmember Nelson and reviewed the past two years of discussion and the process by which cost estimates were developed. She expressed the opinion that the cost data was wrong and also indicated that she believed a number of new items of concern had arisen since the decision in November of 2000, including dioxins and the changes to the original layout for the railroad crossing. She wanted Mn/DOT to comment on the railroad crossing and standards for that crossing. Mr. O'Keefe advised that the plan for the Azelia extension will be approved by the State and that he was aware of no problems with the current design plan. Ms. Niesen discussed the dioxin issues, Minnesota Department of Health warning regarding the western portion of the Joslyn site, wetland mitigation issues, removal of trees, risks to the project if the appeal to the Board of Soil and Water Resources succeeded, risks to Murphy Warehouse, and her desire to hear from each Council Member regarding the information she had supplied. ® 04/22/02 -7- DRAFT Councilmember Peppe spoke of how it had been a long and arduous process over the last two years in reviewing and selecting an alternative for the project. Councilmember Peppe believes that the • Council had done its due diligence and had worked with citizen groups. Councilmember Peppe noted that other agencies have studied the environmental issues. Councilmember Peppe has taken this matter very seriously and believes that the alternative selected will serve people in the future. There is a superfund site located in the City of Brooklyn Center and we have to deal with it. In making decisions, costs to the whole of the City must be taken into and there are constraints on what the Council can afford to do. The Council has made certain that if there are unforeseen costs in the construction of the project that Mn/DOT is responsible for those costs. Councilmember Peppe's decision is based on the many years of discussion and the many sources of information, including information from citizens. Many of the questions have been answered to his satisfaction, though not to satisfaction of everyone. Councilmember Lasman indicated that she agreed with Councilmember Peppe and that she supported the project. She appreciates the work of everyone who had looked into this project and she has read everything from the citizens group. Some of the factors causing her to support the project include the State removal of the eastern portion of the site from superfund designation and the proposed removal from Federal superfund designation, the MPCA approval of the Response Action Plan, and the No Association Letter for the roadway. While the wetland issues are under appeal, the project can continue during that appeal and Mn/DOT is responsible for any costs should that appeal require changes in the plan. The economic impact of taxes from the redevelopment of the de- listed portion of the Joslyn site and jobs are important to the City and especially to the Robbinsdale School District. While the solution is not perfect, Councilmember Lasman believes that it is a reasonable solution to move forward for the long awaited Highway 100 project. Mayor Kragness stated that she supported the project and appreciates the work by the citizens and the information they had gathered and supplied to the Council. She feels that the experts from the agencies that had been involved in reviewing the project have answered the questions brought forward in this process. She believes that it is a safe project, there will always continue to be questions since nothing is ever 100 percent certain. She fully supports the project and appreciates also the many staff hours that had gone into this endeavor. Councilmember Ricker stated that though he had not been here for the original decision, after reviewing all the information and data supporting the decisions he was in favor ofthe project. While there are valid concerns raised, the City has been advised by professionals in State agencies and the City must proceed based on trust in those professional opinions. The other alternatives being put forward were undesirable since he was not in favor of condemning viable businesses. Councilmember Nelson restated his belief that there are alternatives that are better. While the project is feasible, he questioned if economic development would not happen without the roadway configuration. 04/22/02 -8- DRAFT • RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -56 • Councilmember Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A CONSTRUCTION COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2002 -04, FRANCE AVENUE RELOCATION The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded b Councilmember p g g Y Y Pe e. Councilmember Nelson voted against the same. Motion pp passed. g p RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -57 Councilmember Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A PROJECT COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2002 -04, FRANCE AVENUE RELOCATION The motion for the adoption he p on oft foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Peppe. Councilmember Nelson voted against the same. Motion passed. • 8f. STAFF REPORT RE: FORESTRY ACTIVITIES - RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE DESIGNATION OF BROOKLYN CENTER AS A TREE CITY USA FOR THE TENTH CONSECUTIVE YEAR - PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 26, 2002, ARBOR DAY AND MAY 2002 ARBOR MONTH IN BROOKLYN CENTER RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -58 Councilmember Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE DESIGNATION OF BROOKLYN CENTER AS A TREE CITY USA FOR THE TENTH CONSECUTIVE YEAR The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Nelson. Motion passed unanimously. A motion by Councilmember Lasman, seconded by Councilmember Nelson to adopt Proclamation Declaring April 26, 2002, Arbor Day and May 2002 Arbor Month in Brooklyn Center. Motion passed unanimously. • 04/22/02 -9- DRAFT 9. ADJOURNMENT O There was a motion by Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Peppe to adjourn the City Council meeting at 8:24 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. City Clerk Mayor 04/22/02 -10- DRAFT • I • City Council Agenda Item No. 7b s City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community • TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Maria Rosenbaum, Deputy City Clerk DATE: May 8, 2002 -0 SUBJECT: Licenses for Council Approval The following companies /persons have applied for City licenses as noted. Each company /person has fulfilled the requirements of the City Ordinance governing respective licenses, submitted appropriate applications, and paid proper fees. Licenses to be approved by the City Council on May 13, 2002. MECHANICAL Brooklyn Air, Heating, A/C 8862 Zealand Avenue N, Brooklyn Park CO Carlson Air Cond. Co 1203 Bryant Avenue N, Minneapolis Excel Air Systems 2075 Prosperity Road, Maplewood Kumar Mechanical Inc. 877 SW Third Street, New Brighton Pfiffner Heating & Air 6301 Welcome Avenue N, Brooklyn Park Total Heating & A/C Inc. 6960 Madison Avenue W, Golden Valley • MOTOR VEHICLE DEALERSHIP Brookdale Ford, Inc. 2500 County Road 10 R.L. Brookdale Motors 6801 Brooklyn Boulevard RENTAL Renewal: Brookwood Estates 6125 and 6201 North Lilac Drive Lang Nelson Associates Georgetown Park Townhomes James Wiensch 6907 West Palmer Lake Drive Thomas Mylan, Lorraine Owings 5115 Twin Lake Boulevard E Ruth Cioni Initial: 5801 Dupont Avenue N John and Joan Ford SIGNHANGER McKee Sign Service 2721 Chisholm Avenue N, St. Paul 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 (763) 569 -3400 City Hall & TDD Number (763) 569 -3300 FAX (763) 569 -3434 FAX (763) 569 -3494 jy City Council Agenda Item No. 7c OWN CENTF9 BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE DEPARTMENT • POLICE MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager Michael McCauley FROM: Chief Scott Bechthold I DATE: May 6, 2002 SUBJECT: New Sunday Liquor License Duoos Bros. American Legion Post 630 Duoos Bros. American Legion Post 630 currently has a Club license from the City of Brooklyn Center. The Legion has applied for and request an On -sale Sunday License in conjunction with their Club license. I have inspected the premises where the new kitchen has been installed and have reviewed their menu. All appropriate fees have been submitted along with all required documentation. It is requested that the Brooklyn Center City Council approve an On -sale Sunday liquor license in conjunction with the Club license. SB:kh • City Council Agenda Item No. 7d Nlill • 0 COMPANY CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Conducted February 14, 2002 SUMMARY OF KEY OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS MADE BY THE PARTICIPANTS Submitted by Carl H. Neu, Jr. March 6, 2002 • © Neu and Company and the Center for the Future of Local GovernanceT"', 2002 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, • MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL LEADERSHIP WORKSHOP Conducted February 14, 2002 SUMMARY OF KEY OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS MADE BY THE PARTICIPANTS Submitted by Carl H. Neu, Jr. March 6, 2002 L INTRODUCTION • On February 14, 2002, the City Council, City Manager, and Assistant City Manager conducted a City Council Workshop focusing on the objectives and agenda contained in Appendix A to this report. IL KEY OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS A. Specific concerns and issues identified by Council members Each council member was asked to identify specific issues or concerns to be considered by council during this workshop. Once the issues and concerns were identified, a discussion was conducted relative to each one, allowing council to accomplish the following: • Clarification of the issue. • Identification of the parties, and their respective roles, involved. • Identification of information required to bring the issue to resolution. • Degree of influence the city has over the issue. • Identification of options available to the city. • 1 • Identification of a "pathway to resolution" including directions to the • city council and manager on how to proceed with the issue. 1. Issues and concerns raised by council members: a. Local Government Aid (LGA) b. Redevelopment programs: • retail • commercial C. Credibility issues /problems within the city organization. d. Education crisis (school closing) and impacts that this crisis may have on Brooklyn Center. e. Formats available for people to speak to council. f. Housing mix g. Taxes - tax increment financing (T.LF) h. Summerchase L Police J. 2002 municipal elections k. Council teamwork 1. Smart Growth 2. Discussions and conclusions reached pertaining to the above issues. The discussion below does not necessarily follow the order in which items were identified by council members above. a. Local Government Aid (LGA) (1) Clarification of issue: • city is in a dilemma - what is the real impact of the State's budget deficit and cuts in LGA? • • take away of aid (State is playing a "shell game" with cities) 2 • levy limits • uncertainty for city revenues • Governor's perception that "cities have all this money" • eroding public confidence in government • future impacts for 2003 and 2004 • lack of respect for local government at the state level (2) Parties involved: the state legislature which is seen as unlikely to resolve the issue due to a lack of coalition/consensus. Also, the issue is a very political issue. (3) Information required: none identified. • (4) Degree of influence the city has on the issue: a "wee" bit. (5) Options available to the city: (a) go to the legislature to present the city's case. (b) create a state -wide uniform "best practices" that would enable true local control for cities. This would include having the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) pursue these best practices and advocate them for cities rather than just serving as an information provider. (c) Frame a common local government finance agenda involving cities, schools, and counties. Progressively pursue this agenda with the public. (d) Cities need to "debunk'' the governor's • message about all the money cities have. 3 (6) Pathways to resolution: • a () Lobby the state legislature on Local Government Aid (b) Address it from the perspective of "what do we do with the `mess' the legislature deals to us " ?. (c) Let citizens know the principles involved and implications cuts can produce so that the citizens can put pressure on the legislature. Possible message to the citizens "we can't sustain our current levels of service if our LGA is cut ". b. Redevelopment Programs (1) Clarification of issue: • The city can lose projects because it doesn't have the funding to provide subsidies, incentives, and public works improvements. S • There can be a direct impact on the city's P Ys revenue base. • Need to define what the.legislature will let us do. • Need to define the effects that redevelopment will have on T.I.F. (2) Pathway to resolution: the city must make the following decisions relative to T.I.F. District 3: • What do you want to do in District 3? • Have staff develop information and present options to the city council for its consideration. C. Taxes (also see discussion on Local Government Aid and Redevelopment). • (1) Clarification of issue: 4 • Sustaining our tax rate • Potential increases in resident's property taxes • Need for expanding T.I.F.'s - redevelopment • Need for alternative revenue resources; e.g., another liquor store. (2) Pathway to resolution: consider the benefit of another liquor store. This effort will take substantial staff time to do the required analysis and submit recommendations. d. Smart Growth: (1) Clarification of issue: Met Council has identified six communities as opportunity sites. City needs to respond to the plan Met Council will submit for the area around Brookdale. (2) Issues to be addressed relative to the city's response • to the Met Council plan: • Will the plan as drawn by the consultant reflect criteria the city council has adopted? • Can the plan help us shape a vision to modify the city's Comprehensive Plan for commercial and mixed use development (Summer Chase goes away) • If transit hub is on the west side of Bass Lake Road, force the Met Council's hand and develop a transit hub with security, bathroom, etc. Use the Met Council plan for leverage with Met Transit. (3) Pathway to resolution: wait and see what the specifics are of the Met Council's plan and insure that plan meets Council's criteria to address community needs. e. Summerchase • (1) Clarification of issue: 5 • Structural and code compliant issues • Police issues /involvement associated with apartments • Disbursing units rather than concentrating them • Integrating affordable housing with other housing stock (2) Pathway to resolution: • conduct work session on apartments, holding landlords accountable, etc. • see what opportunities there are for improving Summerchase. f. Housing Mix (1) Clarification of issue: • • Need more upscale housing if the city i P g ys t o strengthen its retail base /activity • Need to find a way to do more 53` Avenue projects • Address need for senior housing. (2) Pathway to resolution: the approach to dealing with the housing mix relates back to the Smart Growth discussion above. g. Police Council agreed that a meeting with the Police Chief and the council to discuss police issues would be useful. h. Credibility issues including opportunities for citizen participation and forums permitting people to speak to council. 6 It was concluded that there already exists a "open forum" • permitting an opportunity for citizen- council -staff interactions. i. Education Crisis (1) Clarification of issue: • Cutbacks within the school system can result from state cutbacks in funding. • It is necessary for the city and school district to work together rather than be seen as competing for scarce monetary resources. (2) Pathway to resolution: work from a perspective of a local relationship with the school district and identify options that both can create. This is seen as a "issue of consciousness" for the city working in cooperation with the school district. j. Formats for Public Comments: • Council concluded that this issue already is covered by the Council Handbook. k. Elections: No real discussion occurred relative to this issue. 1. Council Teamwork: Council concluded the continuous need for forums in which members can share ideas and opinions. B. Council's Objectives Relative to the State Legislature The following objectives and supporting strategies were identified: 1. Local Government Aid (LGA) for the city. Strategy: Education of the state legislature and the public. 2. Relief for Joslyn • Strategy: e S ek g rant ® • Seek flexibility to use T.I.F. monies in District 3 • Extend the time for payback. 3. Not forcing children to cross Highway 252 Strategy: Get the legislature to amend the current statutes. C. Priorities for City Manager - Time Allocation The following priorities were identified as the highest immediate priorities for the manager's allocation of his time: 1. State legislature 2. Tax increment financing (T.LF.) 3. Dealing with the current and next year's city budget 4. Smart Growth 5. Developing p g more information on education issues and their impact on the city. D. Review, and updating of, City's Goals for 2002 City council members reviewed the 2002 City Council Goals, a copy of which is contained as Appendix B to this report. The only goal that was changed is Goal No. 10. The new wording reads as follows: Goal 10 - Support and Expand Joslyn Site Development by: D - working with the developer to complete Phase III and overcome effects of last legislative session on the developer's financial capacity. • 8 • APPENDIX A 9 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, • MINNESOTA City Council Workshop February 14, 2002 1. ec Ob' e J tiv s: Upon completion of this workshop participants will have: a. identified and discussed specific concerns and issues of importance to them as council members and to the City of Brooklyn Center. b. targeted items the Council wishes to address collectively and agreed upon a process to: • identify information required to understand and analyze the item • determine the degree of influence the City can achieve in moving the item toward desired outcomes • • define options available to the City establish clear direction on processes to be followed for reaching a conclusion by council on each item targeted. C. established priorities and clear guidance on the City's use of "management time" for the remainder of the year 2002. d. defined the City's objectives, and approaches for achieving these objectives, relative to the state legislature. e. reviewed, and modified as appropriate, the City's goals for 2002. 2. Agenda 2:00 p.m. Welcome and overview of workshop objectives. 2:15 p.m. Council member dialogue: issues and concerns. 3:15 p.m. Items Council wishes to address and processes to be used in reaching specific outcomes or conclusions. • 5:00 P.M. Priorities and guidance on use of "management time" 10 6:00 p.m. The City's legislative objectives and strategies for achieving these objectives. 7:00 p.m. Review, and updating of, City's goals for 2002. 7:45 p.m. Identification of post - workshop activities required to fulfill conclusions reached by Council. 8:00 P.M. Adjourn • • 1� • APPENDIX B 12 2002 City Council Goals Goals are not in any order of priority • Goal 1 - Promote the Inclusion of Goal 5 - Actively Support Goal 9 - Plan for Destination All Residents in Brooklyn Center's Northeast Corner of 69th Avenue and Parks By: Community Life By: Brooklyn Boulevard Redevelopment ➢implementation and review of a ➢emphasizing opportunities to By: specific financial plan for destination include the intent of this goal in all of ➢completing project and monitoring park improvements in the Capital the community's activities and plans developer performance Improvement Plan Goal 2 - Support Brookdale Goal 6 - Complete Community Goal 10 - Support and Expand Redevelopment By: Center and City Hall Retrofitting Joslyn Site Development By: fuse of tax-increment financing Project By: ➢working with the developer to ➢monitoring developer performance ➢completing projects as planned complete Phase III and construction Goal 7 - Continue and Implement Goal 11 - Continuing Traffic Goal 3 - Continue and Improve Loner Term Financial Planning By: Enforcement Efforts and Expand Code Enforcement and Compliance ➢continued five -year planning for Information Available to the Public Activities By: utilities and capital improvements Bv: ➢coordinated efforts of the police and ➢reviewing and developing 'continuing enforcement efforts community development departments contingency planning through multiple resources ➢increased effort and focus on high- 'continuing to evaluate the City's 'continuing and expanding density areas, while continuing financial priorities information to the public on traffic neighborhood enforcement safety and calming efforts 'continuing to evaluate additional Goal 8 - Support and Promote ➢enforcement of noise ordinances as approaches to achieving improved Major Road and Street Improvement d enforcement of noise they relate to noise originating from npliance Projects By: vehicles and vehicular use ➢completing Brooklyn Boulevard •. ncrease ordinances; barking dogs and other project with the County in the year Goal 12 - Utilize noise generating nuisances 2002 and streetscaping in 2003 Recommendations Developed in the ➢Highway 100: continuing to support Opportunity Site Process to Create a Goal 4 - Increased Productivity and participate in the North Metro Vision and Plan for Brooklyn Center's Toward Fighting Crime By: Mayor's Highway 100 Council; Central Business District By: ➢increased visibility of police in keeping project schedule with ➢additional public input on directions neighborhoods and apartment Mn/DOT; completion of the proposed and priorities for development and complexes Neighborhood Watch France Avenue routing redevelopment of the Central Business Programs 'Supporting and participating in the District ➢including public safety information Interstate 694 widening project, with , establishing specific development in all City newsletters. improved sound walls, and in a priorities for the next five -ten years 'continuing and expanding the manner advantageous to the City of ➢modifying and updating the participation rate in all City Brooklyn Center Comprehensive Plan consistent with newsletters the results of public input and planning processes • 13 • City Council Agenda Item No. 7e MEMORANDUM DATE: May 6, 2002 TO: Michael McCauley, City Manager FROM: Todd Howard, City Engineerrv SUBJECT: Resolution Accepting Bid and Awarding a Contract, Improvement Project Nos. 2002 -05, 06, and 06, Garden City South Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements Summary Explanation Bids for Garden City South contract were received and opened on April 17, 2002. The bidding results are tabulated as follows: Bidder Bid Amount Arcon Construction, Inc. $3,001,862.60 S.R. Weidema, Inc. $3,055,681.15 Barbarossa & Sons, Inc $3,390,022.00 Northdale Construction $3,933,469.22 ENGINEER ESTIMATE $3,293,000.00 Of the four (4) bids received, the lowest bid of $3,001,862.60 was submitted by Arcon Construction, Inc. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $3,293,000.00, which is within 10% of 3 of the four bids received. The low bid is approximately $290,000 below the Engineer's estimate and approximately $54,000 below the next lowest bidder, which is indicative of a competitive bidding environment. Arcon Construction, Inc. has proven experience in performing all of the requirements included in this contract and has the resources necessary to complete the project. Arcon constructed last years' project in the Garden City North area. Accordingly, staff recommends acceptance of the low bid and award of the contract to Arcon Construction, Inc. Recommended City Council Action Approve the attached resolution accepting the low bid and awarding the Garden City contract to Arcon Construction in the amount of $3,001,862.60. • adoption: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2002 -05, 06, AND 07, GARDEN CITY SOUTH STREET, STORM DRAINAGE AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Project Nos. 2002 -05, 06, and 07, bids were received, opened, and tabulated by the City Clerk and Engineer on the 17th day of April, 2002. Said bids were as follows: Bidder Bid Amount Arcon Construction, Inc. $3,001,862.60 S.R. Weidema, Inc. $3,055,681.15 Barbarossa & Sons, Inc $3,390,022.00 Northdale Construction $3,933,469.22 WHEREAS, it appears that Arcon Construction is the lowest responsible bidder. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Arcon Construction of Harris, Minnesota in the name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project Nos. 2002 -05, 06, and 07, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract is signed. 3. The estimated project costs and revenues are as follows: • • RESOLUTION NO. COSTS Feasibility Estimate As Amended Per Low Bid Contract $3,248,000.00 $3,001,862.60 Contingency 324,800.00 $300,000.00 Subtotal Construction Cost $3,572,800.00 $3,301,862.60 Admin/Legal /Engr. $245,000.00 $280,000.00 Reforestation $30,000.00 $34,000.00 Streetlights $80,000.00 $70,000.00 Total Estimated Project Cost $3,927,800.00 $3,685,862.60 REVENUES Street Assessment $639,044.16 $639,044.16 Water Fund $314,500.00 $399,000.00 S Storm Drainage Assessment $190,602.22 $190,602.22 Storm Drainage Utility Fund $478,250.00 $392,815.28 Sanitary Sewer Utility $631,700.00 $675,000.00 Special Assmnt. Const. Fund $1,233,703.62 $949,400.94 Munipal State Aid 390,000.00 390,000.00 Street Light Utility 50,000.00 50,000.00 Total Estimated Revenue $3,927,800.00 $3,685,862.60 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: • and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • City Council Agenda Item No. 7f MEMORANDUM DATE: May 6, 2002 TO: Michael McCauley, City Manager FROM: Todd Howard, City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Accepting Bid and Awarding Contract, Improvement Project Nos. 2002 -01, 02, and 03, Southwest Neighborhood Street, Storm Drainage and Utility Improvements Summary Explanation Bids for the Southwest Neighborhood contract were received and opened on May 2, 2002. The bidding results were corrected and are tabulated as follows: Bidder Bid Amount Arcon Construction, Inc. $3,186,903.26 F.M. Frattalone Exc. $3,344,760.97 S.R. Weidema, Inc $3,499,342.29 LaTour Construction $3,696,211.60 Barbarossa & Sons $3,897,155.05 Northdale Construction Co. $4,571,091.25 ENGINEER ESTIMATE $3,805,215.25 Of the six (6) bids received, the lowest bid of $3,186,903.26 was submitted by Arcon Construction, Inc. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $3,805,215.25. The low bid is approximately $618,000 below the Engineer's estimate and approximately $158,000 below the next lowest bidder, which is indicative of a competitive bidding environment. The estimated construction cost at the time of feasibility was approximately $4,500,000. The project costs have decreased significantly because the feasibility estimate included the reconstruction of the 47`' and 48' Avenue, that are no longer included in the project. Arcon Construction, Inc. has proven experience in performing all of the requirements included in this contract and has the resources necessary to complete the project. Arcon constructed last years' project in the Garden City North area. Accordingly, staff recommends acceptance of the low bid and award of the contract to Arcon Construction, Inc. Recommended City Council Action Approve the attached resolution accepting the low bid and awarding the Garden City contract to Arcon Construction in the amount of $3,186,903.26. adoption: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2002 -01, 02, AND 03, SOUTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD STREET, STORM DRAINAGE AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Project Nos. 2002 -01, 02, and 03, bids were received, opened, and tabulated by the City Clerk and Engineer on the 2nd day of May, 2002. Said bids were as follows: Bidder Bid Amount Arcon Construction, Inc. $3,186,903.26 F.M. Frattalone Exc. $3,344,760.97 S.R. Weidema, Inc $3,499,342.29 LaTour Construction $3,696,211.60 Barbarossa & Sons $3,897,155.05 Northdale Construction Co. $4,571,091.25 WHEREAS, it appears that Arcon Construction is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Arcon Construction of Harris, Minnesota in the name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project Nos. 2002 -01, 02, and 03, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract is signed. 3. The estimated project costs and revenues are as follows: I` RESOLUTION NO. COSTS Feasibility Estimate As Amended Per Low Bid Contract $4,526,400.00 $3,186,903.26 Contingency (10 %) 452,640.00 $318,690.32 Subtotal Construction Cost $4,979,040.00 $3,505,593.58 Admin /Legal /Engr. $700,000.00 $700,000.00 Reforestation $21,000.00 $21,000.00 Streetlights $66,000.00 $66,000.00 Total Estimated Project Cost $5,766,040.00 $4,292,593.58 REVENUES Street Assessment $947,995.38 $700,604.18 Water Fund $724,260.00 $439,890.59 Storm Drainage Assessment $381,311.00 $271,644.77 Storm Drainage Utility Fund $546,049.26 $387,122.98 Local State Aid $170,000.00 $ Other Govt. $110,000.00 Sanitary Sewer Utility $755,970.00 $665929.30 Capital Improvement Fund 47,000.00 47,000.00 Street Light Utility $66,000.00 $66,000.00 Special Assmnt. Const. Fund $974,054.36 $714,401.76 Munipal State Aid $1,043,400.00 $1,000,000.00 Total Estimated Revenue $5,766,040.00 $4,292,593.58 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: is and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City Council Agenda Item No. 7g MEMORANDUM DATE: May 6, 2002 TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Todd Howard, City Engineer " SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Execution of an Easement with the Canadian Pacific Railway On April 22, 2002 the City Council approved the execution of a cooperation agreement with the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) for the construction of the France Avenue Connection. Mn/DOT requires that all real estate and easements be acquired before a project can be awarded. Condemnation and negotiations are nearly complete on the four parcels of land required to construct the project. An easement from CP Rail is also required where the road will cross the tracks. Council authorization is required to approve the easement agreement with CP Rail. The France Avenue Connection project includes an at -grade crossing. The new crossing will replace the existing crossing on the current alignment of France Avenue. The cost of easement is $6,600.00. Mn/DOT will reimburse the city for this cost under the terms of the project cooperation agreement. Recommendations It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution authorizing execution of an easement with CP Rail. S Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN EASEMENT WITH THE CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY WHEREAS, the City Council on December 11, 2000 authorized the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding with the Department of Transportation for the France Avenue Connection Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council on April 22, 2002 authorized the execution of a project cooperation agreement with the Department of Transportation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The City Manager is authorized and hereby directed to execute the Easement with CP Rail. 2. The Easement is subject to the review of the City Attorney. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded b P g g Y Y member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City Council Agenda Item No. 7h MEMORANDUM DATE: May 6, 2002 TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Todd Howard, City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Execution of a Utility Easement with the Brookdale Christian Church On May 13, 2002 the City Council accepted the low bid and award a construction contract for the Garden City South project. The project includes replacement of an existing sanitary sewer and construction of a storm sewer on the Brookdale Christian Church property. Council action is required to authorize the execution of an easement agreement. City Staff have met with Reverend Robert Cilke about the proposed easement and the church board has discussed the sale of the easement. The cost of easement is $7,500.00 and this amount has been included in the project costs. . Recommendations It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution authorizing execution of an easement with Brookdale Christian Church. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN EASEMENT WITH THE BROOKDALE CHRISTIAN CHURCH WHEREAS, the City Council on May 13, 2002 accepted the low bid and awarded a construction contract for the Garden City South Project; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to acquire and easement on the Brookdale Christian Church property to construct utility and drainage improvements; and WHEREAS, the negotiated price of the easement is $7,500.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The City Manager is authorized and hereby directed to execute the easement with Brookdale Christian Church. 2. The easement is subject to the review of the City Attorney. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. N.W. COR. SEC. 2, T 118, R 21 - - XERXES AVE. NO. I BROOKDALE CHRISTIAN GARDEN CITY CA CHURCH ADDITION 1 1ST ADDITION BLOCK t ss BLOCK U D LOT w 374 V LOT 1 n • to H EXISTING iTTILITY 1Ss DRAINAGE EASEMENT O _ 1 E%18 M SAWARY SEINER AW fff ~ STORM SEWER EA9EMBM l* I PROPOSED LJTILITY 8s DRAINAGE EASEMENT 0 r I 40 ' S 89'48' 9 E-- — 1 �) � id � �' � v — E7081SK# BAF�MY 8EW6i EASE�S:IR WA AVE. NO. 25 . _ _ 11_�' _ _ -� -� ` -N 00'00'39" E. so' t ,►►►�'�� �-,2' PVC LOT 2 1 '` > t z rvc ct� • City Council Agenda Item No. 7i MEMORANDUM DATE: May 8, 2002 TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Joyce Gulseth, Public Works Administrative Aide, SUBJECT: Resolution Declaring a Public Nuisance and Ordering the Removal of Diseased Trees The attached resolution represents the official Council action required to expedite removal of the trees most recently marked by the City tree inspector, in accordance with approved procedures. It is anticipated that this resolution will be submitted for council consideration each meeting during the summer and fall as new trees are marked. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE REMOVAL OF DISEASED TREES WHEREAS, a Notice to Abate Nuisance and Diseased Tree Removal Agreement has been issued to the owners of certain properties in the City of Brooklyn Center giving the owners twenty (20) days to remove diseased trees on the owners' property; and WHEREAS, the City can expedite the removal of these diseased trees by declaring them a public nuisance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The diseased trees at the following addresses are hereby declared to be a ® public nuisance: TREE PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS NUMBER --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANTONIO COLLODORO & ANN REKKEDAHL 6607 DREW AVE N 1 LORI PETERSON 80058 TH AVE N 2 MARY BETH DAVIDSON 2206 54 AVE N 3 MARK & PEGGY CONNOY 6613 UNITY AVE N 4 2. After twenty (20) days from the date of the notice, the property owner(s) will receive a second written notice providing five (5) business days in which to contest the determination of the City Council by requesting, in writing, a hearing. Said request shall be filed with the City Clerk. 3. After five (5) days, if the property owner fails to request a hearing, the tree(s) shall be removed by the City. All removal costs, including legal, financing, and administrative charges, shall be specially assessed against the property. RESOLUTION NO. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. s City Council Agenda Item No. 8a 0 0 L. CHRIS RICHARDSON, Ph.D. Superintendent Phone: (763) 391 -7000 May 13, 2002 FAX: (763) 391 -7070 Dear Mayor, City Council and Administrators of Brooklyn Center: Thank you for your interest in District 279 — Osseo Area Schools. As you know, the communities that make up District 279 are a great place to live, work, and go to school. I hope the information assembled in this packet will assist you in answering some of the questions that come up regarding the kind of education families hope to provide for their children. Ours is a large District spread out over 66%2 square miles. As the fifth largest District in the state, we serve over 22,000 students—consistently providing rigorous, quality educational programming in friendly, welcoming school environments. Like many other metro districts, we've been in the news a lot in the past year —a reflection of the financial challenges we face as a vital, growing community in a constantly changing world. Despite the challenges, District 279 is one of the finest school districts in the state, preparing students for college, post - secondary vocational training and the job market. You have only to look at the results of standardized tests to see what a good job we're doing. On the state required Basic Standards Test, students in District 279 outperform the state in reading and math. On the Northwest Evaluation Association test, a standardized test given to measure growth in student achievement, we see that students in grades 3 -6 who need additional help to be successful are growing by leaps and bounds. In fact, these students are growing 50% faster in reading than the national average. In addition, this same test shows that more and more of our average and above average performing students are moving to the top of the achievement ladder. In the past two years, we've taken action to make certain that we have adequate space to house our growing school enrollment. In May of 2000, our community voted in favor of a $139 million bond referendum. As we enter the third year of construction, our communities anxiously await the building improvements and new construction that are nearing completion all over the District. This fall Willow Lane will begin a multi - million dollar renovation in preparation for opening in the fall of 2003 as the Willow Lane Early Childhood Special Education and Family Education Center. We will also begin the planning for Phase III renovations and upgrades at Garden City Elementary as well as a possible building addition to support on -going quality K -6 programming for Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park students. Finally, we are currently working with the Odyssey Charter School who desires to enter into a long -term lease of the Orchard Lane Building beginning in August 2002. (Check out the District web site at www.osseo.kl2.mn.us for more information on the upgrades and additions that have and will be made to our Brooklyn Center schools) As you well know, whenever there's construction, boundary changes are right around the corner. Our boundaries were adjusted this year and will take effect next school year —this packet contains the new boundary maps you'll need for elementary, junior, and senior high schools. There is so much more I could tell Y ou —from our Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence to our committed staff and the phenomenal ways our students are growing and achieving each day. Our web site is the perfect place to go to get more in -depth information about all of our schools, and I hope you will not hesitate to call me, or Lisa Hunter, if you need assistance in any way. Respectfully,­—, K Chris Richardson, Ph.D. Superintendent INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 279 Educational Service Center, 11200 93rd Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55369 -6605 2000 -2001 Cost of District /Building Administration and Support Services- per Pupil ST. ANTHONY -NEW BRIGHTON I $1,1)4 HOPKINS J$1,023 WESTONKA i $927 MINNEAPOLIS 1$91'1 RICHFIELD j $833 _ I i BLOOMINGTON $817 EDINA j$814 BROOKLYN CENTER j 779 1 MINNETONKA 1$730 I ST. LOUIS PARK 1$678 WAYZATA 1$661 i EDEN PRAIRIE I � j $655 l ROBBINSDALE 1 $653 ORONO f $610 _I OSSEO $572 ANOKA - HENNEPIN i $499 $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 2000 -2001 Percentage Spent on District /School Administration and Support Services ST. ANTHONY -NEW 0 BRIGHTON I� 1 /o 1 WESTONKA 112.0% HOPKINS I � 111 _ BLOOMINGTON RICHFIELD 110.4 EDINA 10.3% MINNETONKA 19,5% EDEN PRAIRIE 9.3% i I BROOKLYN CENTER 9.3% WAYZATA 18.99 1 0 ROBBINSDALE 18.5% MINNEAPOLIS 18.5% ORONO j 8.4% OSSEO 7.6% ANOKA - HENNEPIN 1 7.4% ST. LOUIS PARK 7.2% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 2000 -2001 Cost of Support Programs per Pupil MINNEAPOLIS I� 1 $2,334 1 ST. LOUIS PARK $2,001 WESTONKA $1 ,979 ROBBINSDALE f $1,7 ORONO j $1,743 - I MINNETONKA 1$1,745 I i HOPKINS $1,74;? EDEN PRAIRIE i $1,632 I � RICHFIELD 1 $1 ,625 WAYZATA 1$1 BLOOMINGTON 1$1 _I EDINA 1$1 ST. ANTHONY -NEW I BRIGHTON I � $1,519 I � ANOKA- HENNEPIN I� 1$1,443 I BROOKLYN CENTER 1$1 OSSEO 1$1,370 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 2000 -2001 Percentage Spent on Support Programs - - WESTONKA 125.7% ORONO ] ' f 23.9% EDEN PRAIRIE 23.2% ROBBINSDALE 123.2% MINNETONKA 122.80/, MINNEAPOLIS 21 I i WAYZATA 121.7% ANOKA- HENNEPIN 121.5% I ST. LOUIS PARK 1 21.2% BLOOMINGTON f 20.8% RICHFIELD 1 20 I EDINA 20.1% HOPKINS 19.3% ST. ANTHONY -NEW I BRIGHTON OSSEO 118.3% BROOKLYN CENTER 116.8% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 0 0 25.0% 0 0.0 /0 15.0 /0 20.0 /0 30.0 /o 2000 -01 Cost of Instruction per Pupil MINNEAPOLIS 1$7,410 ST. LOUIS PARK j$6,764 HOPKINS i $6,266 I BROOKLYN CENTER 1$6,175 RICHFIELD ( 1$5 ,578 I OSSEO ! $5, 54 EDINA $5,4 2 ST. ANTHONY -NEW BRIGHTON 1$5,422 BLOOMINGTON ( J$5,281 ROBBINSDALE j $5,268 MINNETONKA f $5,188 WAYZATA 1$5,147 ORONO j$4,948 WESTONKA 1$4,809 ANOKA- HENNEPIN 1$4,767 EDEN PRAIRIE 1$1-,746 $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 2000 -2001 Percentage Spent on Instruction OSSEO 1 74.10 BROOKLYN CENTER 73.9% ST. LOUIS PARK II 1 71.6% 1 ANOKA - HENNEPIN 171 1 '.1% MINNEAPOLIS 1 69.9 %' EDINA 69.6% WAYZATA 169A% RICHFIELD 1 6 .4% HOPKINS ( 169.4% I BLOOMINGTON 1 68.6 I % ROBBINSDALE 1 68.3 °0 ORONO 1 37.8% MINNETONKA I � 1137.7% 1 EDEN PRAIRIE f E7.5% ST. ANTH BRIGHTON 1 67.4% 7.4% WESTONKA ( j 62.3% 56.0% 58.0% 60.0% 62.0% 64.0% 66.0% 68.0% 70.0% 72.0% 74.0% 76.0% Osseo Percentages of Expenditures per Pupil Total Total support administration and programs support services 18% 8% z r Total instruction 74% �,I 2002 -2003 State Aid Per Pupil ST. ANTHONY -NEW BRIGHTON 1$5,405 ST. LOUIS PARK $5,351 ORONO $5,351 HOPKINS 1 $5,341 RICHFIELD 1 $5,341 WESTONKA $5,336 OSSEO ( 1$5,319 WAYZATA 1 $5,31' EDEN PRAIRIE 1$5,31' I MINNETONKA 1$5,308 I I ROBBINSDALE 1$5,303 I I BLOOMINGTON 1$5,289 ANOKA- HENNEPIN 1$5,285 EDINA 1$5,276 BROOKLYN CENTER 1$5,241 MINNEAPOLIS I 1$5,221 f I I I $5,050 $5,100 $5,150 $5,200 $5,250 $5,300 $5,350 $5,400 $5,450 $5,500 2002 -2003 Operating Levy per Pupil ST. LOUIS PARK I 1 $1,748 HOPKINS ! $1 �93 J EDINA i $1,408 I MINNETONKA 1 $1,258 I ROBBINSDALE i a966 i WAYZATA ( f $954 ST. ANTHONY -NEW BRIGHTON 1$9 21 ORONO 1$731 WESTONKA $7119 RICHFIELD $674 BLOOMINGTON 1 $674 i EDEN PRAIRIE 1$645 BROOKLYN CENTER $581 � MINNEAPOLIS j$422 OSSEO 1$322 ANOKA HENNEPIN 1 $160 $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800 $2,000 2002 -2003 Basic Aid and Operating Levy per Pupil I i i ii ST. LOUIS PARK I $7,099 HOPKINS'; ° " "'.. $6,834 EDINA $6,684 MINNETONKA $6.566 ST. ANTHONY -NEW . BRIGHTON �.::<- °;9F:� $6,326 ROBBINSDALE $6,269 WAYZATA $6,26 ORONO J -) 1 $6,082 I WESTONKA ::', . : J $6,055 RICHFIELD " .. ( $6,015 1 BLOOMINGTON °,') ($5,963 EDEN PRAIRIE $5,956 I 1 BROOKLYN CENTER i $5,8 2 MINNEAPOLIS; $5,643 OSSEO) $5,641 ANOKA- HENNEPIN,, :;4<. $5,445 $5,000 $5,500 $6,000 $6,500 $7,000 $7,500 Difference in Formula Dollars Received by Hennepin County Districts 2000 -2003 IN $200 $143 4 184 $ $160 $140 Highest and Lowest° =.:n ° 'k r.+ $120 ',a -• .. - m � '. � a+ x. , ;Agb $100 5 $40 Osseo and Highest $20 2000 -2001 2001 -2002 Year 4 . 2002 -2003 ti Difference in Operating Levy Referendum Dollars Received by Hennepin County Districts 2000 -2003 $1,650 $1,588 $1,550 s $1,450 " .. ;•: ��. ._ � ,� a��� �6.: :4a.i:Gii j'�2q ;Ei(fi�$ rAif6� $1,350 $1,128 Highest and Lowest $1,136 $1,250 $1,426 $1,150 $1,050 $950 $935 I $951 Osseo and Highestm, $850 $750a \Wx \ a' 2000 -2001 2001 -2002 Year i 2002 -2003 Difference in General Fund Dollars Received by Hennepin County Districts 2000 -2003 $3,000 t r :g 2 911 i � ma y=' 3":,i -, •.4.. R .. •N.�.' .: '�'. $2,900 $2,709 e < .x:> ...N ' 2 756 _' <: '`'' ^• x $2,800 ., ' N` ' i _ rt;C. 2 Je' -Tier: °x�� {':,,•iY ..� Sb'. $2,700 Highest and Lowest r2 Rk 2,600 $2 $2,400 f/ Q:•:f`w,x $2,301 $2,300 $2,395 $2,468;y $2,200 Osseo and Highest °- $2,100 $2 000 w °. .' f. \. 2000-2001 : mow. as a s v' w . . 2001 -2 002 Year 2002 -2003 , II I I I I IMPACT OF BUDGET REDUCTIONS ON DISTRICT 279 1 2001 -02 deficit reduction of $2.0 million A. Loss of staff ■ 31 elementary and secondary regular classroom teachers ■ 9 support staff B. Loss of programs and services • Lengthened walk boundaries to 1 3/8 miles for students in 10th -12th grades. Increased mid -year to two miles for students in 7 -12 grades • Reduced Assurance of Mastery (AOM) teachers /staff • Reduced staff development and training • Reduced co- curricular activities, e.g. orchestra & jazz ensembles, drama club, mock trial • Increased athletic fees by $10 /student C. Increased class sizes ■ 70 upper - elementary classrooms above 30 students ■ Junior high classrooms in excess of 33 student/classroom and senior high classrooms in excess of 30 students /classroom in every math, science, social studies, and language arts class II. 2002 -03 deficit reduction of $14.7 million -- pending final legislative action A. Loss of staff — totaling 206 employees ■ 74.3 of 889 elementary and secondary regular classroom teachers ■ 7.25 of 297.3 special education teachers /staff ■ 4.0 of 13.5 talented and gifted program teachers ■ 14.5 of 37.5 information technology specialists /teachers ■ 3.6 of 34.7 elementary music program teachers ■ 7.0 of 22.5 counselors, chemical counselors, social workers ■ 34.6 of 618 paraprofessionals ■ 20.1 of 184 ESC administrative, technical, clerical, paraprofessional staff supporting human resources, accounting, payroll, purchasing, transportation, media, operations and maintenance, warehouse, curriculum, and building /district operations 11.6 of 18.6 building administrative and instructional assistants ■ 2.0 of 29 secondary building clerical staff ■ 27 of 156 custodial /maintenance staff B. Reduction of services, supplies and materials • Regular education instructional supplies & materials • Printing services • Contracted repairs • Special education supplies, materials and services II. 2002 -03 deficit reduction of $14.7 million (continued) C. Increased class sizes • Lower elementary: from current 21 to 23 students /classroom • Upper elementary: from current 29 to 31 students /classroom • Junior high: maintains class size of - 33 due to move from 7- to 6- period schedule • Senior high: from current 30 to 33 students /classroom • English Language Learner Program: from current 35 to 47 students /classroom D. Loss of programs & services • Elimination of WECEP program • One year staff development freeze • One year curriculum improvement process freeze • One year freeze of English Language Learner staff and budget • Elimination of bus transportation for secondary students within two miles • Elimination of all late /activity buses • Reduction in district office services • Buildings cleaned less frequently • Less supervision of elementary & secondary students • Student athletic and co- curricular participation fees doubled • Increased cost of tickets for all activities • Elimination of AOM program, teachers and staff • Reduction in support for classroom instruction • Reduction in elective courses at both junior and senior high levels • Elimination of instructional swimming program E. Closure of Orchard Lane Elementary F. Budget impact across the District ■ 28% reduction in ESC administration and instructional support staff ■ 10% reduction in Elementary Division ■ 10% reduction in Secondary Division ■ 12% reduction in all other program areas Ill. Financial condition of the State of Minnesota is poor A. Currently facing $2.5 billion shortfall for 2003 -05 biennium B. 40% of the Minnesota's state budget is K -12 Education C. Funding increases for schools are unlikely IV. State's financial problem will become the financial problem of schools for the next 3-4 years A. District 279 cannot operate from year to year with a zero increase in state funding without additional budget cuts to cover inflationary increases. B. District 279 is facing a shortfall of $6 -7 million in 2003 -04 and again in 2004 -05 if increases in revenue are not provided. Possible Budget Reduction Areas for 2003 -04 Extend 1 -6 Transportation boundary from 1 to 2 miles $500,000 Close 1 additional elementary building $450,000 Close 1 additional elementary building $450,000 Return Elementary PBB from 90% funding to 88% funding $753,244 • 2.0 FTE principals • 13.84 FTE teachers • .9 FTE PE teacher Return Secondary PBB from 90% funding to 88% funding $712,574 • 16.0 FTE teachers • Reduce supplies Make extracurricular activities 60% self - supporting $350,000 Make extracurricular activities completely self - supporting $850,000 Make co- curricular activities 60% self - supporting $78,302 Make co- curricular activities completely self - supporting $229,764 Additional I% PBB reduction all areas* $1,489,533 Additional I% PBB reduction all areas* $1,489,533 Request 2nd year reduction of staff development program $643,000 Total of Possible Reduction Areas $7 *A 1% PBB budget cut will result in the following approximate cuts in these areas: Elementary Instruction and Support $340,000 Secondary Instruction and Support $320,000 OALC $5,000 Athletics $157000 Music $25,000 Student Support $30,000 Administrative Support $40,000 Instructional u S pport $25,000 Custodial and Maintenance $75,000 Transportation $45,000 Above the line matching reduction in Special Education, ELL, $570,000 contract increases, fixed costs WILLOW LANE ECC (44.31) I Construct/H VAC (PROJECT CATEGORY & Defer Maint Arch/Eng/Fees Testing Contingency Total I Budget $ 2,237,981 $ 181,470 $ 36,380 $ 175,138 $ 2,630,9691 I Encumbrances (Construction bids S ITAB/Testing & Commissioning S I - L s (Change orders to date 1 S Non - Encumbered Expenditures to date (Architect S Engineering $ I Permits/Fees S (Other _. _... __....... !_ ................ S I .... ..... _._ .... ....._._...........__.. S - :...................... ..... - S I S S i S S - I s - S - S - IEncumbrancelExpenditureTotal S S GARDEN CITY (44.12) Construct/HVAC PROJECT CATEGORY & Defer Maint Arch[Enq/Fees Testing Contingency Total Budget $ 1,117,231 iO,849 3i,373 $ 99,162 $ 1,335 Encumbrances Construction bids ITAB/Testing & Commissioning lChange orders to date I S 2 S S S INon-Encumbered Expenditures to date jArchitect jEngineering S lPermits/Fees - -------- - 10ther S S S $ EncumbrancetExpenditure Total S District 279 Mission The District of Excellence — dedicated to educating and empowering every learner to excel in our changing world. Welcome to Osseo Area Schools. If you have school -aged children and are considering a move into the District, here are a few facts to help you get to know ® District 279. • ♦ Osseo Area Schools is the fifth largest district in the state and third largest district in Hennepin County. ♦ Osseo School District is spread over 66 1/2 square miles and serves eight northwest suburbs, including all or parts of Brooklyn Park, Maple Grove, Brooklyn Center, Osseo, Plymouth, Corcoran, Dayton, and Hassan. ® ♦ The student population of Osseo Area Schools is nearly 22,000, with over 15,000 students transported to and from school each day. ♦ Compared to the private sector, Osseo Area Schools is the 64th largest business in the • state. ♦ Osseo Area Schools consists of nineteen elementary schools (K -6), four junior highs (7 -9), three senior highs (10 -12), an area learning center, and three .� pre - school and post secondary sites. • ♦ Osseo Area Schools is a comprehensive learning community providing a kindergarten • through 12th grade program that prepares students for entry into traditional 4 -year college, 2 -year vocational - technical program, or the job market. In addition, the District provides Adult Basic Education classes both day and evening. ♦ Elementary programs offer students a wide ` variety of educational experiences from remedial to enrichment options including all -day kindergarten at seven of our elementary buildings. ♦ At the secondary level, the District provides over 250 basic, advanced and elective courses as well as televised programming. ♦ District 279 offers band, orchestra, and chorus at all levels. Drama, musical and performance group opportunities are available at the junior and senior high levels. ♦ Community Education and Services provides life -long learning and enrichment opportunities for all residents. Programs include Early Childhood Family Education for parents and pre -K children, adult basic education, adult enrichment classes, after school and summer youth enrichment classes, and a volunteer coordinator at each school. The Kidstop program provides high - quality care for school - aged children before and after school and the summer ♦ Osseo Area Schools has one of the most recognized special education programs in the state, offering Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE), K -12 special education services at the building level and at the Osseo Secondary Transition Center (OSTC) for young adults to age 21. • Talented and Gifted (TAG) Program Services provide learning opportunities for high - ability students. At the elementary level, identified students in grades 2 -6 participate in pull -out seminars. Junior high TAG students participate in High Performance (HP) courses in English, science, social studies and math. In senior high, they continue HP courses and may take Advanced Placement classes in their junior and senior years. • Talented and Gifted students also have opportunities to participate in extracurricular Academic Challenges such as Destination ImagiNation, Future Problem Solving and Mock Trial. Many teams have earned regional, state, and global recognition for their outstanding performance. ♦ For students in grades 7 -12 who would benefit from an alternative learning environment, District 279 opened the Osseo Area Learning Center (OALC). ALC's offer students a non - traditional learning environment, individualized learning, and a range of personal and social support services to ensure their academic success. ♦ The seven -year curriculum adoption cycle provides for regular review and revision of every curriculum area and the teacher training, new textbooks, and instructional material necessary for student success. ♦ District 279 has approximately 5,000 networked computers (over 1,500 in the last three years). All have Internet access via our wide area network. The K -12 ratio of students to computers is 4.75 to 1. i On the Minnesota Basic Standards Test, eighth graders had higher passing rates than the state average on both reading and math. The percentage of students meeting the passing rate for reading has improved steadily and is currently 82 %. ♦ On the Northwest Evaluation Test, District 279 third through eighth graders have higher average scores at every grade level, and are a full year's growth ahead of other students nationally in reading by the eighth grade. ♦ In 2001, seniors had a higher average score on the ACT than both the nation and the state. ♦ Sixty -eight percent of our graduates enter either a 2- or 4 -year college, with an additional 10% attending technical colleges and trade schools. • Strong community support has resulted in construction of thirteen of the District's twenty -six schools over the last twenty -five years. • In the spring of 2001, a massive 5 -year renovation and construction project of school facilities began thanks to a voter - approved referendum of $138.9 million. The project will touch every building, resulting in improved facilities and significantly more space for students of District 279. For more information about Osseo Area Schools, check out our web site at: www.osseo.kl2.mn.us Osseo Area Schools - District 279 OUR MISSION The District of Excellence - dedicated to educating and empowering every learner to excel in our changing world. OUR BELIEFS 1. Learning is the primary focus of our District. 2. Student achievement is the responsibility of the school and the learner in collaboration with family and community. 3. All learners must be challenged to perform at their peak levels and to pursue academic excellence. 4. Learners must be engaged in relevant learning which produces measurable results. 5. Every learner must have equitable access to consistent curriculum. 6. Respectful, caring relationships are fundamental to a successful educational experience. 7. Learners, parents /guardians, staff, and community members must be actively welcomed, informed, and treated respectfully by every employee, or District representative. 8. The recognition, acceptance and appreciation of, and sensitivity to, diversity is critical to the learning and lives of the people of our District. 9. Every person must be valued as unique and important. 10. Valuing diversity requires ongoing adaptation to the changing needs of our population. 11. Physical and emotional safety is the responsibility of the District in collaboration with students, staff, family, and community. 12. Continuous school improvement is necessary to improve student achievement. 13. Participatory decision - making, consistent with District beliefs, results in quality decisions. STRATEGIES 1. We will continuously improve educational programs to meet the various and changing needs of all learners. 2. We will implement challenging district -wide curriculum to prepare all learners to be creative, life- long learners. 3. We will develop a comprehensive plan for school readiness. 4. We will provide intervention and support for students of all ages that decreases the disparity of academic achievement and graduation rates. 5. We will provide opportunities for students who are more successful in non - traditional settings. (Continued) STRATEGIES (Continued) 6. We will support the inclusion of curriculum which models and teaches students positive personal attributes and social skills. 7. We will implement programs and activities that promote an environment of comfort and trust for the broadly diverse population of our District, and support the District's Multicultural Gender Fair Disability Sensitive (MCGFDS) plan. • Implement intra/inter District Desegregation Plan • Recruit /retain diverse staff reflective of our population • Provide staff /peer development to encompass broad issues of diversity • Integrate diverse perspectives into core curriculum. 8. We will align the District structure to support implementation of a cohesive District and building staff development plan to meet needs of all employees and to support the strategic plan. ■ Develop interschool communication plan to support staff development collaboration ■ Focus on instructional strategies ■ Consider and plan for the staff development needs of all employee groups, i.e., ALC, ECFE, ECSE, ABE, food service, custodial, etc. 9. We will implement a mandatory comprehensive and coherent staff development program to include all District staff that recognizes a new vision for individual and organizational growth through reflective practice integrating all components, such as TAG, SPED, general education, ECFE/ECSE, multicultural curriculum. 10. We will provide alternative staff development opportunities to overlap programs and offer summer opportunities. ■ Include non - traditional programs such as ALC, ECFE, ECSE, ABE, in more useful and valuable ways for staff development 11. We will focus staff development training on specific instructional strategies for use in the classroom. 12. We will integrate technology into instruction and management to enhance resource options for education and communication opportunities. 13. We will implement a comprehensive district -wide communication plan to effectively provide necessary information to, and receive input from, students, parents, staff and community. 14. We will pursue and maintain community partnerships to provide additional resources of time, talent, materials and finances to support the learning process. • Develop community partnerships • Develop programs that welcome learners and parents • Develop programs that promote parent involvement • Promote opportunities and successes of the District • Utilize the time, expertise and opinions of parents, students and community 15. We will effectively and equitably allocate resources and will aggressively seek additional funding to support our mission and beliefs. • Hire staff to mirror community • Enhance programs with appropriate staff • Reduce class size • Enhance building maintenance • Recruit and retain quality staff • Provide innovative, home -grown teacher programs September 4, 2001 Osseo Area Schools — District #279 Osseo Area Schools serves all or parts of Brooklyn Park, Maple Grove, Plymouth, Brooklyn Center, Osseo, Corcoran, Hassan, and Dayton. The District has 20 elementaries (K -6), four junior highs (7 -9), three senior high (10 -12), and one area learning center (grades 7 -12). Osseo is a comprehensive preK -12 school district, preparing students for college, post- secondary vocational training, and the job market. Elementary schools focus on reading and math achievement. Students also receive instruction in writing, research, science, social studies, physical education, and the arts. Literacy in technology, media, and information retrieval is taught within subject areas. Many schools offer a variety of programs such as Be- 4 preschool, Early 5 preschool, all -day kindergarten, multi -age classrooms, and team teaching. Title I programs provide academic support to improve reading and math skills through an individualized plan for improvement. Junior high schools offer middle -level programming designed to provide students an opportunity to sample elective courses and advance to levels where they show aptitude. The senior high schools offer more than 250 basic, advanced, and elective courses including calculus, advanced math, and science courses. Each school offers three years of foreign language instruction in French, German, and Spanish. Secondary students who would benefit from alternative schooling can attend the District's area learning center (ALC) — a non - traditional, individualized learning environment that provides a range of support services. Every school provides a wide variety of program services for talented and gifted learners ranging from enrichment services at the elementaries to advanced classes in English, math, science, and social studies at the secondary level. The District's highly ranked special- education program provides services from birth to high school graduation, or up to age 22. Whenever possible, services are provided in regular classrooms with same - age children. In spring 2001, a construction project began to improve facilities and add classroom space. For more information, call Elementary (763- 391 -7084) or Secondary (763- 391 -7110) Education. November 2001 Characteristics of Independent School District No. 279 - Osseo Area Schools Total Population ............. ............................... 122,228 Grading: g Letter ...................:...... ............................... Elem. /Sec. Minority Statistics: Other .......................... ............................... Elementary American Indian/Alaskan o Asian/Pacific Islander ........... ............................10% Specified Homework Policy .. ............................... No Hispanic............................... ............................... 2% Black ..................................... ............................14% % Schools Accredited: White.................................. ............................... 73% Elementary ................................ ............................... 0 JuniorHigh ................................ ............................... 0 State Enrollment Options Program ...................... Yes Senior High .............................. ............................100 Number of Students in district: Number of Instructional Days .............................. 172 Elementary Pupils .......... ............................... 11,672 Secondary Pupils ............ ............................... 10,495 Number of Teacher Improvement Days................... 5 Number of Buildings: May Visit Classes in Session ............................... Yes Elementary............................ ............................... 19 Junior High .............................. ............................... 4 % Staff Degrees: SeniorHigh ............................. ............................... 3 Bachelor's ............................ ............................... 100 Area Learning Center .............. ............................... 1 Masters' s................................ ............................... 64 Doctorate.................................. ..............................1 Age of Buildings: School Built'51 -'69, ........................................... 13 Certified Staff: After'70 ................................ ............................... 14 Elementary Art ..................... ............................... No Elementary Phy Ed .............. ............................... Yes Length of School Day .. ............................... 6.5 hours Elementary Music ............... ............................... Yes Elementary Media Ctr .............. ............................Yes Average Class Size: Elementary (K -3) .............. ............................... 21.3 Courses Offered: Elementary (4 -6) ............... ............................... 27.2 Elementary Choir ................ ............................... Yes Secondary ........................... ............................... 28.5 Elementary Band ................................................ Yes Elementary Orchestra .......... ............................... Yes Pupil Staff Ratio Elementary .............................. 15.9 Secondary Choir.................. ............................... Yes Secondary Band .................. ............................... Yes No. of Non - Athletic Extracurricular Activities...... 26 Secondary Orchestra ........... ............................... Yes French ....................... ............................... Secondary $ Expenditure/Per Pupil Unit .......................... $6,959 Spanish p ................ Secondary German ..................... ............................... Secondary Bus Available ........................... ............................Yes English as a Second Language ................ Elem./Sec. % Students Bused .............. ............................... 75% Other Languages .................. ............................... No Advanced Computer ............ ............................... Yes Parent Handbook Available .. ............................... Yes Calculus............................... ............................... Yes Number of AP Courses ........... ............................... 7 Days Hot Lunch Available per Week ...................... 5 Pupils Per Computer: Sec. Guidance & Counsel /1000 Students .............. 2.0 Elementary .............................. ............................... 5 Secondary............................. ............................... 4.5 Scheduled Parent Conferences ................ 3Elem. /Sec. (continued) % Seniors Went On To: District 279 Athletics: CommunityCollege .............. ............................... 18 Baseball .. ............................... ........................... Boys Vocational Technical ............ ............................... 10 Basketball ................................................ Boys/Girls Collegeor University .............. .............................41 Football ............................................................ Boys Ice Hockey ......................... .....................Boys /Girls Average ACT Scores: Downhill Skiing ...... ............................Not available English ............................... ............................... 21.5 Cross Country Skiing ......... ..................... Boys /Girls Math ........ ............................... ...........................22.6 Tennis ...................................................... Boys/Girls Reading .............................. ............................... 22.6 Golf ..... ............................... .....................Boys /Girls Science Reasoning ............. ............................... 22.4 Softball .............................. ............................... Girls Composite .......................... ............................... 22.4 Synchronized Swimming .. ............................... Girls % Students Taking ACT ....... ............................... 57 Swimming ................ ............................... Boys /Girls Wrestling........................... ............................... Boys National Merit: Volleyball .......................... ............................... Girls Commended .......................... ............................... 10 Track ........................ ............................... Boys /Girls Finalists & Semifinalists ......... ............................... 6 Cross Country Running ........................... Boys /Girls Gymnastics........................ ............................... Girls Preschool /Latchkey .................. ............................ Yes Soccer ........................... ........................... Boys /Girls Cheerleading ................ ...........................Boys /Girls Program for Gifted / Talented . ............................... Yes Danceline........................... ............................... Girls Fee for Athletics .................... ............................... Yes Percentage Bldgs with Handicapped Access ....100% Education for Disabled .......... ............................... Yes November 2001 Osseo Area Schools School Age Childcare S C 9 Kidstop is the district sponsored childcare program that wrkscoperativy with your school to help your child grow. Kidstop develops and providegsfe,. enriching environment that accepts and d buil ds o n the strengths of each child. Kict` '<he:FrQ an:`f Excellence. The p ram offers: v O hi C ldcare Monday-Friday from 6.30 ..�. � .......................... non-school days. s. O A saf e, convenient r o ram located wit `` � o t h�cn m s sch . O Chil dcare g Y rri dcare durin the school year and t >.af the sub tne�' ; <::'' <.:;' < >__': O Reasonable ble w Y tuition eekl tuiti fees. O Creative cu • mcul and d `nu�•:'ild s school s that >enhGe....� ' » O Trained staff who support and enrich our'1d; tevelo melt: ....... Y .: p O A childcare that t work wi < ` t ' hel su `ort.;;; , > :> e '': d program s th. t� cl p pF: < y�u� hats O A summer car `` >: prior t e progr for children eriter�`' < >kinder arten >the' "suinmex., 0 0 P g g P en school. __ ........ term g Activities include: O Science, reading, choice time, arts /crdK music` o fdoar ;::::time, drama/theater, social skill building, cooking, themes and site /grou projects lus more... 1 1 1 t d r- � ...:::::::::::::: :::::: S 6` 9 fi. � C ............ ................ ................. 4 u... .. ............................... .......................... .................. ............. . :....:..:.......... ...........................::.. . Vi•µ: ....:::..::... >: >'.i » �£«<f`<�" iii` s » ?z' < " < ::::s:i::i<.;:•::...... For your Kindergarten childcare needs.... Watch for a flyer in the mail mid -April to register for Kindergarten Kidstop! Registration and enrollment information, current rates, and Kidstop locations will be included. Kidstop fills quickly, register by the due dates to insure a place in the program for your child! For more information call (763) 391 -7120 or e -mail websterj @osseo.K12.mn.us Instructional Programs The curricular programs of District 279 have been organized according to logical kindergarten through grade 12 sequences. The content of each program is defined b a topic outline which sets the general limits of the q p g Y P g program of study. Instructional objectives specify what students are to be able to do as a result of instruction. The elementary school experience begins with kindergarten sessions which emphasize basic number skills, language development, motor development, reasoning skills, and social skills. In grades one through six, students receive instruction in reading, mathematics, science, social studies, English, spelling, handwriting, health (including human sexuality /HIV /AIDS), physical education, art, and music. Specialists provide instruction in physical education and music. Students receive instruction from specialists in instrumental music, with orchestra beginning at grade 5 and band at grade 6. Selected students also are given opportunities in talented and gifted program services beginning at grade 2. There is a strong similarity among the programs of the four junior high schools. There is some grouping of students in language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies. In addition to the regular classes, there are high performance classes for students who are rapid learners and are highly motivated. Students are required to participate in three years of language arts, science, social studies, health /physical education, and mathematics classes. In grades 8 and 9, electives are offered in the areas of life skills, technology education, vocal and instrumental music, world languages, and art. The electives exist primarily to provide opportunities to develop new interests through exploration and investigation. (over) G� District 279 OSSEO AREA SCHOOLS At the senior high level, students are required to participate in three years of language arts, two years of social studies, and one year each of mathematics, science, and physical education/ health. Electives are available which allow further exploration or specialization, including participation in courses at the local vocational technical college. Students may choose a set of courses which will lead into immediate employment, entrance into a vocational school's training program, or entrance into college. The needs of students and youth with disabilities are also addressed. Most of the students with disabilities are in mainstream classes for the majority of the day and receive special instruction and related services from the support staff. Instruction is based on an individual program plan designed to meet the unique needs of the learner. Self- contained special classes are also available for students who need more intensive small group and individual instruction. Special Education and related services are provided to children from birth through age 21, or completion of a secondary program. All of District 279 staff have opportunities for professional and personal development through the district's staff development program, and teachers are highly involved in curriculum development activities. These factors contribute to a positive attitude and high expectations for student achievement. 4/01 Student Support Services Independent School District 279 provides a variety of support services to students. These services include special education programs, school social work and psychological services, guidance and counseling, health services, pre - school health and development screening, and English as a Second Language. SPECIAL EDUCATION Each elementary and secondary school has special education teachers, educational speech /language pathologists, adapted physical education instructors, and other diagnostic and therapy specialists who provide evaluation, special education instruction and related services to children and youth with disabilities. Most students with disabilities are in the regular classroom for the majority of the school day. Students can receive special education instruction and related services in a variety of settings within the school building including regular classes, small group resource classes, and individual or small group therapy. Instruction is based on an individual education plan designed to meet the unique needs of the learner. Special education classes are also available for students who need intensive small group and individual instruction for the majority of the school day. Special education and related services are provided to children from birth through age 21, or completion of a secondary program. Some special classes are provided cooperatively with neighboring school districts. Transportation is provided when a student attends a special program in one of our local schools or a school outside of the district, if the school is not in the student's neighborhood attendance area. School psychologists work at all levels within our schools. They are specialists in evaluating conditions interfering with a student's educational progress. Together with a team of other specially trained personnel and teachers, they help formulate any necessary accommodations or modification in a students educational program. They also provide consultation to teachers and parents on matters such as student management, growth, and development. School social workers also help in the process of evaluation. They are available at the early childhood and elementary level to work with student adjustment problems, parent counseling, and teacher consultation. They act as a liaison between the school and other community agencies working with a student or family. They are a primary resource on matters of child abuse and neglect. (over) District X 2'79 'OSSEO AREA SCHOOLS I STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES Counseling services are available both at the elementary and secondary levels. Counselors at the elementary level provide developmental affective education through classroom lessons and group and individual counseling for academic and personal concerns. At the secondary level, counselors, placement specialists, and chemical awareness counselors are available to help students with a variety of needs. They include: educational - vocational planning, chemical abuse problems, normal adolescent development concerns, and referral assistance for extended or specialized counseling needs. Both the elementary and secondary counseling programs offer students an opportunity to be trained as "Peer Counselors" and "Peer Mediators." Students so trained become sensitive to peers or younger students who are in need of academic or personal/ social help. Where they can act as a "caring friend" and help, they will; where more help is needed, they will refer. District health services are provided in each school by Health Services Specialists. Their major functions are: emergency care for sick or injured students, health screening, maintaining health records, and assisting teachers and parents in teaching desirable health practices. English as a Second Language programs are provided for students whose primary language is other than English. Specially trained teachers and paraprofessionals help the students acquire functional and receptive/ expressive use of the English language so they can benefit from the regular education program. Services also falling under the jurisdiction of Student Support Services are Student Records, Section 504, Safe and Drug -Free Schools, Homebound students, Home School students, and Nonpublic students: F 4/01 Career /Vocational Education Rationale - Career Education in District 279 educates K -12 students for the ongoing process of career development by emphasizing self - awareness, interpersonal relationships, personal decision- making skills, a work ethic, employability skills and an understanding of the diversity of work necessary to pursue productive lives in a rapidly changing socioeconomic world. Research affirms that a comprehensive career development program is effective in providing benefits such as: increased school completion rates, higher self- esteem and self- concept, better social adjustment and improved job related literacy. Legislation has launched initiatives that are focused on preparing students for a demanding and rigorous 21st Century. This legislation tells us that the preparation that is required includes career awareness and exploration, the achievement of high standards, proficiency in using technology and relevant experiences that provide connectedness between learning and future career decisions. Career development in the Osseo School District is grounded in the National Career Development Guidelines which show that people usually progress through an age appropriate process of awareness, exploration and preparation activities. All students in District 279 have the opportunity to discover, explore, and experience careers in many ways and through a variety of resources. Helping young people explore the vast career opportunities available to them requires support, assistance and mentorship by parents and families, through partnerships with higher education, business and the community, as well as the schools. We welcome any support that can be given to learners of all ages in this lifelong process known as career development. A few noted opportunities in District 279: Elementary • Integrated career education lessons • Service learning activities • Classroom speakers • Community tours • Mentoring Secondary • An individualized portfolio process which includes interest, aptitude and ability, and achievement assessments. • A variety of school and community -based experiences available to students, parents, and staff. • Career Resource Centers staffed with technical tutors and placement specialists, an electronic database system of resources for career development activities. • PSEO (Post - secondary enrollment options) and many articulated courses where enrolled students earn post - secondary credits while in high school, classroom speakers, job shadowing, mentorship, internship, service learning, and job training programs. (over) C District X 2'79 OSSEO AREA SCHOOLS Career and Technical Education emphasizes the necessity for students to attain academic literacy skills, in addition to skills in communication, thinking and reasoning, problem solving and technology. Career and technical programs are known to offer applied classroom instruction, hands -on lab work and worksite learning programs. Personal attitudes and behaviors, work ethic and employability skills, interpersonal relationships and family and consumer roles are components of the curriculum. District 279 Programs: - Family and Consumer Science, Grade 7 -12 - Technology Education, Grade 7 -12 - Business and Computer Education, Grade 10 -12 - Cooperative Education, Grade 10 -12 (Opportunities in Emergency Care, Certified Nursing Assistant, Internship, Mentorship, Youth Apprenticeship, Service Learning, Work Experience OJT) - WE/ CEP - Work Experience and Career Exploration Program, Grade 9 - CBVAT - Community Based Vocational Assessment/ Training Transition Program - Special Needs, Grade 7 -12 Cooperative education programs provide students the opportunity to work in a high interest area related to current career goals. The school, parents, employer or host site work together to assist students in developing career goals, leadership skills, and job competencies. These learning opportunities are available through all of the program areas. Additional vocational training /career exploration choices for 11th and 12th grade students are available at Hennepin Technical College through Career Cluster programs: LEVEL Computer Art, Multimedia and Print Child Development Construction/ Building Systems Computer Careers Manufacturing/ Engineering Culinary Arts/ Food Service Medical Careers Introduction to Service Occupations Transportation Environmental Horticulture LEVEL II - These are skill building courses available to students after completion of the Level I Career Cluster Programs. These courses are designed for those persons who are ready to focus on a career field and have a desire to learn higher -level technical skills. LEVEL III - College Major Courses - These are advanced training courses available to high school students who have typically completed Level I and II program courses. Courses can earn credits that lead to A.S. degrees, diplomas, and certificates. NOTE: If 65% of the jobs in the current market require more than a high school diploma, 20% require a bachelor's degree or higher, and only 15% require no occupational skills training- students should leave high school with plans for further education and technical/ professional skills training. U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 10 Fastest Growing Occupations (1998 -2008) Computer engineers; Computer support specialists; System analysts; Database administrators; Desktop publishing specialists; Paralegals and legal assistants; Personal care and home health aides; Medical assistants; Social and human service assistants; Physician assistants EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS - BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS - FEBRUARY 2000 4/01 General Information District 279, is a young, energetic and growing school district. Located directly north and west of the city of Minneapolis, it is the State's fifth largest district. The land area of 66 1 / 2 square miles encompasses all or part of the communities of Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, Osseo, Maple Grove, Plymouth, Corcoran, Dayton, and Hassan. These communities are a combination of old and new, suburban and rural. During the past decade, District 279 grew by more than 4,000 students. This growth permits the ongoing employment of new staff members. Today the staff is a blend of teachers from all age groups. Students are tested regularly. The Stanford Achievement Test (SAT) is administered annually to all students in grades 3, 6, 9, and 11. Locally produced tests based on district instructional goals are administered to students in the fall and spring. Generally, students do very well when compared to state and national averages. Approximately 60% of students go on to college and 10% go on to vocational/ technical schools. Students taking college entrance exams score above the state and national averages in the composite score and above state averages (all Minnesota scores are above national averages) in natural science and math. Scores on the Minnesota Basic Standards tests and college entrance exams have been improving in recent years. District 279 contracts bus service for approximately 15,000 students each day. Kindergarten students living more than one -half mile and all other students living more than one mile from school are bused. Other facts about District 279 schools which you may find useful: • There are 20 elementary schools, four junior high schools, three senior high schools, and one area learning center. A full curriculum of subjects is provided in a relatively traditional setting. • Students age five on or before September 1, are eligible for entrance into kindergarten. • Orchestra is offered beginning in the 5th grade, and band in the 6th. There is an elementary select chorus for students in grades 4 -6, and some schools offer before or after school choir for the intermediate grades. • A variety of methods is used to report student progress to parents, including interim reports, progress reports and parent conferences. • District 279 has invested millions in its computer education program. The goal is to teach computer literacy at all grade levels. The current program is introducing, among other things, Local and Wide Area Network (LAN & WAN) capabilities in all schools. • District 279 offers a comprehensive educational program at all levels, and this becomes more evident at the junior and senior high schools. A broad scope of course offerings are designed for large student bodies with a wide variety of educational needs. The curriculum provides for students who enter the job force upon graduation, for those who enter vocational programs and for the college - bound. • The District's Area Learning Center (ALC) opened fall 2000 -01 for those in grades 7 -12 who would benefit from an alternative learning environment. The ALC will offer individualized learning and a range of personal and social support services to ensure academic success. (over) District OSSEO AREA SCHOOLS • The National Hot Lunch program is offered in all schools. In the secondary schools, limited ala carte items plus multiple full meal choices are offered daily. • District 279's varsity teams compete in the Northwest Suburban Conference during the regular season. For post- season tournaments, our schools are a member of the Minnesota State High School League, Region 5AA. Teams in all sports, boys and girls, are frequent conference champions and participants at regional and state tournaments. • New and modern facilities are available to students within many of the schools in District 279. Included are: four indoor swimming pools, gymnasiums at all of the schools (many of the seven secondary schools have two gymnasiums), many tennis courts, two lighted soccer fields, three ice arenas, several football fields, and three outdoor all - weather running tracks. • The after - school use of buildings for recreational purposes is a cooperative program operated by the District 279 Community Education Department and the Parks and Recreation Departments of District 279 communities. There are four large auditoriums and one small auditorium available for public use after school hours. • Special amenities in the District 279 community include the suburban Hennepin Technical College located in Brooklyn Park, North Hennepin Community College also located in Brooklyn Park, Fish Lake Regional Park in Maple Grove, the North Hennepin Trail System in Brooklyn Park and Maple Grove, and the 5800 -acre Elm Creek Park Reserve located in Maple Grove and Dayton. These parks are part of the Hennepin County Park Reserve System. • All metropolitan cultural arts and sports activities are readily accessible to the residents of District 279. District 279 schools have received numerous state and national awards including United States Department of Education recognition of the Title I Program. Two elementary schools and one high school have been named Schools of Excellence in Minnesota by the U.S. Department of Education. One of these elementary schools (Cedar Island) was named National School of Excellence in 1990. Park Brook Elementary,was named National Blue Ribbon School in 1997 by the U.S. Department of Education. North View Junior High was recognized as a National Drug -Free School of Excellence in 1993. District students have won many regional, state, and international Odyssey of the Mind, National Problem Solving, and Science Fair competitions. We are the only school district in Minnesota with two Destination ImagiNation international championship teams. Our students compete in a local High School Math League and the Continental Math League. Our high schools are accredited by the North Central Association. The District has won many communications and media awards, especially in the area of Public Relations and locally produced television. This information packet is a "School Bell Award" winner and the recipient of the "Golden Achievement" award of the National School Public Relations Association. For more information, contact: Lisa Hunter, School/ Community Relations Director Osseo Area Schools Educational Service Center 11200 93rd Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55369 (763) 391 -7002 4/01 Media/Technology Today's learners are living in a world where information is a dominant resource. In order to excel in this rapidly changing world, our learners must be information literate. Information literacy is the primary focus of District 279's Media/ Technology program. An information literate learner is able to: • efficiently access data • thoughtfully process information • effectively communicate insights and findings Information Technology Specialists provide leadership for the Media/ Technology Programs in each of the schools in our district. These licensed professionals collaborate with teachers to plan and facilitate learning experiences which integrate information literacy skills into relevant subject area curriculum. They work closely with principals, teachers, and students to ensure that the media/ technology collections and facilities meet the needs of the learners and instructional programs in each school. The school media/ technology programs are supported by Instructional Media and Technology and Technology Management Services which provides: • training in the use of technology • shared collection of instructional and professional resources • technical support for software applications and networks • equipment maintenance and repair • cataloging and processing of media materials • video production • web management 4/01 District X 2'79 OSSEO AREA SCHOOLS Talented and Gifted Program Services Talented and Gifted Program services are delivered by the Schoolwide Enrichment Model (SEM) in order to nurture talent across a wide variety of performance areas and to encourage creative productivity and academic excellence in all students. This year, twenty elementary schools and all four junior high schools are involved in providing SEM program services to all students. These services include the following components: (1) assessing student strengths, (2) curriculum and instruction modifications, (3) Type I enrichment consisting of general exploratory activities designed to bring the learner in touch with a topic or area of study, (4) Type 11 enrichment which consists of curriculum and instruction relative to effective thinking skills, and (5) Type III enrichment which provides students with the opportunity to pursue an in -depth investigation in an area of interest. At the elementary level, Talented and Gifted Program specialists also provide direct services to academically talented students through a program called ExCEL beginning at grade two. In the spring of each school year, all parents of first graders receive a letter asking for assistance in identifying children who demonstrate high levels of verbal - linguistic and logical - mathematical ability, creativity, and motivation. Nominated by either parent or teachers, these students are screened by Talented and Gifted Program specialists for entrance into the elementary program. Students are selected on the basis of these criteria: present math and reading levels, teacher and parent rating scales concerning motivation and creativity, and a high score on the Structure of Intellect Test. The top 5 % -10% of all students in the district are then placed in Talented and Gifted Programs for the following school year. The ExCEL Program is designed and implemented by TAG Program specialists. Currently, fifteen specialists provide services to twenty elementary schools. Students are "pulled out" of the classroom by the specialists once a week for 1 1/2 hours. Seminars are provided during the year which center on such topics as creative problem solving, independent research, and specific topics in math, language arts, social studies, and science. These seminars are also open to students who are not formally identified for services, but who demonstrate interest and ability in a specific topic. (over) District X2'79 OSSEO AREA SCHOOLS At the junior high level, students are selected for seventh grade High Performance classes through a districtwide identification process conducted each spring. Teachers and parents of all sixth graders are asked for assistance in identifying students interested in a program for talented learners in the academic areas of science, social studies, math, and/or English. Students are selected for High Performance classes on the basis of a student application, teacher recommendation(s), test scores in the appropriate areas, and a writing sample. Curriculum differentiation in these classes focuses upon accelerated pacing, in -depth study, interdisciplinary learning, professional thinking skills, and quality products. In addition to High Performance classes, a half- ' time specialist at each junior high school also coordinates all program services including schoolwide enrichment and acceleration activities, as well as academic challenges. Talented students also have an opportunity to pursue in -depth investigations either on an individual or a small group basis through a resource room. At the senior high level, a variety of options exist for academically talented learners. High Performance classes in various content areas as well as challenging electives are offered. The Autonomous Learner Humanities Program (ALP ) is offered for students in grades 10, 11, and 12 at Park Center Senior High and at Osseo Senior High School through ALP Biology and Chemistry. At Maple Grove Senior High students may elect to participate in Autonomous Learner Program classes in Humanities. Each ALP class focuses upon group activities which stress self- awareness and understanding of others as well as the processes of research and creative problem solving. Particular emphasis is placed upon complex learning activities involving simulations, debates, career explorations and interdisciplinary studies. Students may also participate in mentorship experiences through the Mentor Connection Program sponsored by District 287. In addition, college credit classes in English and social studies are also available to those students who rank in the top 20% of their junior or senior class. At all levels K -12, a variety of academic competitions are available for students in the areas of communications, science, math, social studies, and vocational/ career education. District 279 is particularly proud of its Destination ImagiNation, Future Problem Solving, and Mock Trial teams which have consistently placed in the top rankings at state and world finals. 4/01 Community Education Community Education represents the concept of Life -Long Learning. Community Education is a process of coordinating community resources (human, physical and financial) to meet the social, educational, and recreational needs and interests of the community. Programs, as a result of this process, strive to serve people of all age groups. Community Education is a process which involves many district citizens in the identification of program needs and offerings. The Community Education Program Advisory Council is the major vehicle for this process. For further information about the following programs, please call 391 -7114. The Independent School District 279 Community Education and Services Department is dedicated to: • life -long learning opportunities for all • citizen involvement in program development and delivery • comprehensive and accessible programs and services • cooperative and collaborative interaction of school and community • proactive initiatives for the benefit of children and adults PROGRAMS: Early Childhood and Family Education - A parent and child (ages 0 -5) learning experience based on the premise that the parent is the child's first and most influential teacher. Parents and children attend classes together. Parents are involved in planned interaction and observation times with their children and also take part in group discussion, designed to provide information on positive parenting alternatives and child development. Kidstov - A nonprofit, low -cost, school -age, child care program for kindergarten -6th grade children, designed to meet the needs of working parents whose children need care before and after school hours. The primary goal is to provide social and intellectual learning experiences for children. It is not a school structured learning situation, but a structured recreational environment in which learning is emphasized through experience and exposure to various activities. After- School/Summer Enrichment The Community Education Department also works in conjunction with elementary schools to coordinate after - school enrichment classes and activities. Additionally, a summer youth enrichment program is offered. Evening High School Diploma - This program provides an opportunity for anyone 16 years of age or older, who is no longer attending school, to earn (in an individualized format) a high school diploma by demonstrating high school level ability. G.E.D. - A preparation program for passing the G.E.D. (General Educational Development) test. This course is offered throughout the school year and is based on skills rather than clock hour requirements. (over) District X 2'79 OSSEO AREA SCHOOLS i Adult Basic Education - Participants receive individualized instruction with material selected to meet their needs. Students have the opportunity to advance or review skills in reading, writing, or mathematics. English as a Second Language - This program provides assistance for adults whose native language is not English. Classes are designed to serve beginning to advanced levels of English competency. Small group instruction places emphasis on conversation, reading, spelling, and writin . g Travel and Adventure Series - This program offers seven film lectures throughout the school year. These travel films are narrated in person by the professional speaker who produced the film. Community Resource Volunteer Program - This program provides opportunities for community residents to participate as volunteers in a variety of educational programs including Early Childhood Family Education, K- 12, Adult Basic Education, and English as a Second Language. Volunteers are urged to share their skills and interests as resource speakers, tutors, advisory council members, classroom assistants, mentors, and homebound volunteers. Orientation and appropriate training are provided. Parenting Education Opportunities - Classes and workshops are offered throughout the year to help parents develop parenting skills. Continuing Education Adult Evening Classes - One of the most visible components of Community Education is the non - credit evening class program. Classes are offered in many different subject areas including: Special Interest, Financial Planning, Personal & Family Enrichment, Improving Your Health, Adventures in Art, Stitche Shop Topics, Clever a ry, p p er Cr fts, Home Handyperson, The Great Outdoors, and Real Estate. Each year more than 6,000 people participate in evening class programs. Community Use of School Facilities. - District 279 operates under the premise that the public schools are owned and operated by and for community residents and that the schools are an integral part of our community. The school district welcomes and encourages the public use of school facilities. Early Childhood Health and Developmental Screening - This program involves a careful, simple check of your three- to five - year -old child's "Grow Power." The results of this voluntary screening may identify an area of concern that may require special attention before your child enters school. The program is targeted for every child residing in District 279. 4/01 History of District 279 District 279, now the State's fifth largest school district with nearly 21,000 students, traces its roots to the early 1850's. The territory, originally named " Bottineau Plain" by Pierre Bottineau, was opened for permanent settlement by the Federal Government in the spring of 1852. Prior to that time, the land was part of the Fort Snelling eserve an d d protected from settlement by a treaty with the Dakota Indians. The Objibwa (Chippewa) was the major tribe in the area at the time of original settlement. l The plain was soon named Brooklyn by early settlers who came from, of all places, Brooklyn, Michigan. It extended from Crystal Lake on the South to Champlin on the North and from the Mississippi River to the Township of Maple Grove. The original 26,000 acres were then subdivided (presumably for the purpose of locating settlers) into the four major prairies: Jenkins, Long, Bottineau, and Getchell. The first town -like settlement in the area was Osseo, located in Bottineau Prairie. Originally under the government of the townships of Brooklyn and Maple Grove, the City of Osseo was incorporated by act of the Minnesota Legislature in the spring of 1875. The first school in the area opened in a board shanty in Long Prairie in 1854. Miss Augusta McLaughlin, from Portland, Maine, taught ten students there. She died of tuberculosis after that first year. In 1855, Miss Amelia Griggs became the school teacher. Another school was opened in 1855 b the wife of a Rev. Partri Ill health p revented her from finishi the P Y g p g year and she was succeeded by Mary Smith. Just one year later the Society of Spiritualists founded a school in Osseo. The first teacher at the school was Miss Sylvia Rowe. Two ears later, 1858 a s e S ociety of S piritualists ' h y y oo district was formed and th S t Sc ho o l was purchased. There was a succession of frame and brick school houses in Osseo during the next sixty -six years. In 1924 the first grade school (1 -12) was built in Osseo. The building was located at the present site of Osseo Senior High School. The original District number was 43 and the area was six and one -half square miles. A gymnasium /auditorium was added to the building in 1935. The structure was razed in 1975 and replaced by a second gymnasium. From 1924 to the early 1950s that brick building housed all district children. In the late forties and early fifties, things began to change because of school district consolidation. A new law required that all non - graded school districts consolidate with a district which operated a high school. Previously, students in the area attended one- and two -room schools and then enrolled in Anoka, Osseo, Minneapolis North, and Henry High Schools. B 1953, thirteen small, common school districts in the Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Plymouth, and Maple Y Yn � Y � Y � P Grove area had consolidated with Osseo District 43. The reason - the central location of Osseo Senior High. In the fall of 1957, with most of the consolidation complete, District 43 became District 279. In 1964, the last consolidation here, and possibly in the metro area, took place. It was the Hennessy Hill Common School District in Southwestern Maple Grove. (over) G District 279 OSSEO AREA SCHOOLS • During the late fifties and most of the sixties, District 279 experienced rapid growth. By 1971, many additions had been made to Osseo Senior High; and twelve new elementary buildings, three junior highs, and a second high school (Park Center) had been constructed. Winnetka Elementary was leased from Robbinsdale District 281 in 1977, and two newly - constructed elementary schools, Elm Creek and Rice Lake, were opened in the fall of 1980. In 1985, the school district opened Sunny Hollow Elementary, the second building leased from the Robbinsdale District. Two elementaries, Fernbrook and Edinbrook, opened in the fall of 1988. Maple Grove Junior High, the district's fourth junior high, opened in 1990. An additional two elementaries, Oak View and Weaver Lake, opened in the fall of 1991; and the newest of new, Rush Creek and Basswood elementaries opened in the fall of 1995. Maple Grove Senior High opened the fall of 1996. A new Area Learning Center (ALC) opened in the fall of 2000 for 7 -12th graders who would benefit from a non - traditional learning environment. From the earliest settler to today's suburban residents, education has always been a top priority. With this priority in mind, District 279 is always striving to improve its fine educational tradition and to carry out the District Mission: "To be the school district of choice -- educating all learners to excel in our changing world." 4/01 ZERO TOLERANCE/WEAPON FREE SCHOOLS - FOR ELEMENTARY STUDENTS IN DISTRICT 279 In order to promote a safe school environment, District 279 has approved three policies relating to student behavior regarding weapons. Policy 506 is Student Rights and Responsibilities; Policy 5115 is Attendance - Suspension; and Policy 535 is Attendance - Exclusion and Expulsion. DISTRICT 279 TAKES A What does possession mean? What is meant by disciplinary Possession means having control of or action? (Continued) POSITION OF ZERO storing a weapon. Any elementary student who TOLERANCE ON REAL possesses, uses, or distributes any AND LOOK -ALIKE What does use mean? weapon, other than a loaded/unloaded WEAPON'S Use means using a weapon to threaten gun, B -B or pellet gun, will have the and/or harm people or property. weapon confiscated and a conference with parent(s) will take place. What does "zero tolerance" What does distribution mean? Additional disciplinary action taken by mean? Distribution means making a weapon the elementary building principal may Zero tolerance means that students are available to someone else. include detention, suspension, or a forbidden to posess, M, or distribute recommendation for expulsion. any instrument that is considered a weapon or look -alike weapon in What LS expulsion. ? Expulsion is an action taken by the school. School Board to prohibit an enrolled VIOLATION OF THE student from further attendance for a What is considered a weapon? WEAPONS POLICY WILL period that shall not extend beyond an i • Guns - loaded or unloaded, including amount of time equal to one school B -B and pellet guns; RESULT IN year from the date the student is • Starter guns, replicas, and toy guns, DISCIPLINARY ACTION expelled. including squirt and cap guns; What is Suspension? • Knives; Suspension is an action taken by the • Explosives including firecrackers, What is meant by disciplinary school principal to prohibit a student smoke bombs, cherry bombs, action? from attending school and/or homemade devices, and bullets; Any elementary student who participating in any or all • Others, including nunchakus, brass possesses, uses, or distributes a gun, extracurricular activities for a period of stars/knuckles, tear gas, and mace. loaded or unloaded, including B -B and no more than five school days. pellet guns will be o= i i A Message from LEGISLATION the Superintendent The Gun -Free Schools Act of 1994, ISD contained in the Improving America's Dear Parents: School Act, states that there must be a state 279 law requiring schools to expel students for We are all aware of the increase of violence at least one year who are determined to POLICY ON in our .society. District 279 is commited to have brought a firearm to school. ZERO providing a safe environment for your child in our elementary schools. The purpose of The 1995 Minnesota Legislation amended TOLERANCE this brochure is to make you aware of the the Pupil Fair Dismissal Act (MN Statutes zero tolerance policy regarding weapons in 121A.40 to 121A.56) to provide that a REGARDING District 279 elementary schools. School Board must expel for a period of at WEAPONS least one year a pupil who is determined to It is our sincere hope that you will spend have brought a firearm to school. time with your child(ren), discussing the seriousness of weapons and to help them MN Statute 609.02, Subdivison 6 defines understand the policies of District 279 dangerous weapons. regarding weapons. MN Statute 120A.22, Subdivision 4 We do not believe that we are overreacting defines a school. to the concern about weapons in our society and in our school district. We are MN Statute 152.01, Subdivision 14(a) DISTRICT 279 committed to safe schools. Weapons are a clause 1 and 3 defines the school zone. MISSION real concern in our society and in District 279. We must work together to promote To be the school district of choice - and maintain a safe school environmentfor - your child to learnt. educating all learners to excel in our changing world. - � I ' District Dr. L. Chris Richardson Superintendent ( 2 7 9 OSSEO AREA SCHOOLS - FOROUR CHILDREN'S Independent School District 279 SAFETY Osseo Area Schools 11200 93rd Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55369 • City Council Agenda Item No. 9a 3r - Office of the City Clerk City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community MEMORANDUM TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk DATE: May 8, 2002 SUBJECT: Public Hearing on An Ordinance Amending Chapter 7 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter At its April 8, 2002, meeting, the City Council approved first reading of An Ordinance Amending Chapter 7 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter and set second reading and public hearing for May 13, 2002. Public Hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun -Post on April 17, 2002. If adopted, the ordinance amending the City Charter shall be effective ninety (90) days following its legal publication; effective date will be August 20, 2002. Attachments • Memorandum Dated 3/28/02 Introducing Ordinance Amendment • • Ordinance Amendment • Minnesota Session Laws, 1st Special Session, Chapter 5, Article 7, Section 21 • January 23, 2002, Brooklyn Center Charter Commission Meeting Minutes 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 (763) 569 -3400 City Hall & TDD Number (763) 569 -3300 FAX (763) 569 -3434 FAX (763) 569 -3494 Office of the City Clerk OX City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community MEMORANDUM TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk DATE: March 28, 2002 SUBJECT: An Ordinance Amending Chapter 7 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter During the 2001 Legislative Session, Chapter 5, Article 7, Section 21 was passed regarding renaming the Board of Equalization to the Board of Appeal and Equalization. Section 7.04 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter defines and establishes the Board of Equalization. Information regarding the new law was forwarded to the Charter Commission for review. At its January 23, 2002, meeting, the Charter Commission unanimously voted to recommend amending Section 7.04 by changing the name of the Board of Equalization to Board of Appeal and Equalization. An ordinance amendment has been drafted to amend the Charter to rename the Board of Equalization to Board of Appeal and Equalization. Attachments • Ordinance Amendment S • Minnesota Session Laws, 1st Special Session, Chapter 5, Article 7, Section 21 • January 23, 2002, Brooklyn Center Charter Commission Meeting Minutes 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 (763) 569 -3400 City Hall & TDD Number (763) 569 -3300 FAX (763) 569 -3434 FAX (763) 569 -3494 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER • Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 13th day of May, Y g. p g y ay, 002, at 7 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at the West Fire Station Training Room, 6250 Brooklyn Boulevard, to consider an amendment to Chapter 7 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the City Clerk at 763 -569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7 OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER CITY CHARTER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 7.04 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter is hereby amended as follows: Section 7.04. BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION. The Council shall constitute a Board of Appeal and Equalization to equalize assessments of property for taxation ® purposes according to law. Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and ninety (90) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of .2002. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Strikeout indicates matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.) • Sec. 21. Minnesota Statutes 2000, section 274.01, subdivision 1, is amended to read: Subdivision 1. [ORDINARY BOARD; MEETINGS, DEADLINES, GRIEVANCES.) (a) The town board of a town, or the council or other governing body of a city, is the board of T_- app eal and equalization except (1) in cities whose charters provide for a board of equalization or (2) in any city or town that has transferred its local board of review power and duties to the county board as provided in subdivision 3. The county assessor shall fix a day and time when the board or the board of equalization shall meet in the assessment districts of the county. Notwithstanding any law or city charter to the contrary, a city be of equalization shall be referred to as a board of appeal and equalization. On or before February 15 of each year the assessor shall give written notice of the time to the city or town clerk. Notwithstanding he provisions of an g p Y charter to the contrary, the meetings must be held between April 1 and May 31 each year. The clerk shall give published and posted notice of the meeting at least ten days before the date of the meeting. If ryam, -at - 1,.ast 2-5 pereent -ef - the tGt -al n =taii caproc- ty G a cites -;,r town i3 F�e31£�rT�r�3C-i-��. �Cu�J::-,l �...�� -r-: cr a t i an a l 273.1-3, b 25 h_- uYlt .., �� �, y moat hV ��:, c-o-un yea -rde inf =ati3n al me tiF,: -c will :.11v:d cc;.l o.'? +, v;:1 t - a xpuy i=s 4 .e- F i ti t rty- vF luatiG� wi', u'_ • v u c + =^ rte �_ ,a,,l ct-aff. Thee — ra czzrcxuy - ili v£ - l�u zvlal iCrG l3 .' b se t — 11 w c�?� G.3 Gf 3 e :.a Sul vEu tiii rLs�=it` a! r eeice n.al prepc ty th_-- epf� ton.' ty - tv att e'Af.' o= R�,cctinga pry o-r to t t h e sehedu�ee �o id�f �i�� —f e hc� =�y e�.J.. . . Th3 Ui i;. a' m�_ctiny- -Gutz3 - muJ be eent the netiee -ef vaiidatien of a, +. i an6ei= + r,, 273.121. The board shall meet at the office of the clerk to review the assessment and classification of property in the town or city. No changes in valuation or classification which are intended to correct errors in judgment by the county assessor may be made by the county assessor after the board of r -e�iew has adjourned in those cities or towns that hold a local board of review; however, corrections of errors that are merely clerical in nature or changes that extend homestead treatment to property are permitted after adjournment until the tax extension date for that assessment year. The changes must be fully documented and maintained in the assessor's office and must be available for review by any person. A copy of the changes made during this period in those cities or towns that hold a local board of review must be sent to the county board no later than December 31 of the assessment 'year. (b) The board shall determine whether the taxable property in the town or city has been properly placed on the list and properly valued by the assessor. If real or personal property has been omitted, the board shall place it on the list with its market value, and correct the assessment so that each tract or lot of real property, and each article, parcel, or class of • personal property, is entered on the assessment list at its market value. No assessment of the property of any person may be raised unless the person has been duly notified of the intent • of the board to do so. On application of any person feeling aggrieved, the board shall review the assessment or classification, or both, and correct it as appears just. The board may not make an individual market value adjustment or classification change that would benefit the property in cases where the owner or other person having control over the property will not permit the assessor to inspect the property and the interior of any buildings or structures. (c) A local board of r-e�,; ew may reduce assessments upon petition of the taxpayer but the total reductions must not reduce the aggregate assessment made by the county assessor by more than one percent. If the total reductions would lower the aggregate assessments made by the county assessor by more than one percent, none of the adjustments may be made. The assessor shall correct any clerical errors or double assessments discovered by the board ef aceview without regard to the one percent limitation. (d) A majority of the members may act at the meeting, and adjourn from day to day until they finish hearing the cases presented. The assessor shall attend, with the assessment books and papers, and take part in the proceedings, but must not vote. The county assessor, or an assistant delegated by the county assessor shall attend the meetings. The board shall list separately, on a form appended to the assessment book, all omitted property added to the list by the board and all items of property increased or decreased, with the market value of each item of property, added or changed by the board, placed opposite • the item. The county assessor shall enter all changes made by the board in the assessment book. (e) Except as provided in subdivision 3, if a person fails to appear in person, by counsel, or by written communication before the board after being duly notified of the board's intent to raise the assessment of the property, or if a person feeling aggrieved by an assessment or classification fails to apply for a review of the assessment or classification, the person may not appear before the county board of appeal and equalization for a review of the assessment or classification. This paragraph does not apply if an assessment was made after the local board meeting, as provided in section 273.01, or if the person can establish not having received notice of market value at least five days before the local board of iaeview meeting. (f) The local board - r ic,. ar the '-o-urd e- cq u1i ate; n must complete its work and adjourn within 20 days from the time of convening stated in the notice of the clerk, unless a longer period is approved by the commissioner of revenue. No action taken after that date is valid. All complaints about an assessment or classification made after the meeting of the board must be heard and determined by the county board of equalization. A nonresident may, at any time, before the meeting of the board of rc file written objections to an assessment or classification with the county assessor. The objections must be presented to the board e-f r aio:; at its meeting by the county assessor for its consideration. [EFFECTIVE DATE.] This section is effective January 1, • 2002, and thereafter. MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 23, 2002 BROOKLYN CENTER CHARTER ® COMMISSION The meeting was called to Order by Chairman Harold Middleton at 7:05 p.m. Member Present: Harold Middleton, Roni Brunner, Carl Wolter, Bob Cambanes, James Holst, Walter Bursch, Sy Knapp, Todd Paulson and Eileen Oslund. Stan Leino arrived at 7:23 p.m. Members Absent and Excused: Elizabeth Hatle and Richard Theis. Wolter moved to approve the minutes of the June 27, 2001 meeting with the deletion of Diane Sannes' name from attendance and Brunner seconded. Motion passed. Wolter suggested that the order of the agenda be moved to address the Report of the Nominations Committee and the agenda was changed by consensus. The Report of the Nominations Committee was heard. Bursch moved to appoint Knapp p pp as Chairman for 2002 and seconded by Paulson. Motion passed unanimously. Wolter moved to appoint Cambanes as Vice - Chairman for 2002 and seconded by • Brunner. Motion passed unanimously. Holst moved to appoint Leino as Secretary for 2002 and seconded by Brunner. Motion passed unanimously. Chair Knapp appointed Cambanes as Public Relations Chair. Chair Knapp appointed Holst as Audit Chair. Chair Knapp appointed Paulson as Rules and Parliamentarian Chair. Chair Knapp volunteered to serve as Adopt -a -Park Chair. Future meeting dates were set for March 27, June 26 and October 23, 2002, and January 22, 2003. Chair Knapp noted that Janice TI and Nancy Carlson had received notices of expiration of their respective terms. Chair Knapp noted that neither Thielsen nor Carlson has attended meetings in the past year. • Chair Knapp will advise Chief Judge Kevin Burke that Carlson's and Thielseri s respective seats are now declared vacant. Leino moved to change name Board of Equalization to Board of Appeal and Equalization in City Charter. Cambanes seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Chair Knapp noted that Chairs of Brooklyn Center Commissions will be meeting with the City Council at 6:30 p.m. on March 18, 2002 at the West Fire Station. Leino moved to send Rod Snyder as the representative of the Charter Commission for special recognition to the City's 91St birthday celebration and Paulson seconded. Motion passed. Paulson will notify the City of Rod Snyder's recognition. Discussion was had regarding the at- large- versus -ward systems for election of City Councilmembers. Wolter moved to form a sub - committee to study the issue and Cambanes seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Wolter agreed to serve as Chairman of the sub- committee to study the issue of at- large- versus -ward system for City Council elections. Oslund, Cambanes, Theis and Leino will serve on the sub - committee. The sub - committee's first meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. on February 13, 2002 at Wolter's house. The sub - committee will have a report by the S March 27, 2002 meeting of the full Charter Commission. Discussion was had regarding local campaign finance reform. By consensus, the issue will be placed on the agenda for the March 27, 2002 meeting. Motion by Holst and seconded by Leino to adjourn. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Stan J. Leino Secretary • City Council Agenda Item No. 10a • PROCIALUTION DECLARING MAY 28, 2002, TO BE "ORCHARD LANE ELEMENTARY DAY "AND "WILLOW LANE ELEMENTARY DAY ", IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, the presence of good schools in a neighborhood greatly enhances the quality of life in that neighborhood; and WHEREAS, Willow Lane Elementary School has educated children in Brooklyn Center from 1956 -2002; and WHEREAS, Orchard Lane Elementary School has educated children in Brooklyn Center from 1965 -2002; and WHEREAS, a combined total of approximately 36,000 students have been cared for, educated, and nurtured in these two institutions of learning in Brooklyn Center over many years of existence; and WHEREAS, both of these schools will be greatly missed by students, staff, and families that have been served by each of these schools, as they close their doors for the final time in e June, 2002; and WHEREAS, the dedication, perseverance, patience, and teaching efforts of the staff from both buildings demonstrate the same ultimate goal for students, a safe, wholesome, learning environment for all students, regardless of race, creed, gender, background, or other differences. NOW, THEREFORE, I, AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, State of Minnesota, with the consent and support of the Brooklyn Center City Council, do hereby proclaim May 28, 2002, "Orchard Lane Elementary Day" and "Willow Lane Elementary Day ", in the City of Brooklyn Center. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk • City Council Agenda Item No. lOb ® PROCLAMATION DECLARING MAY 12-18,2002, AS POLICE WEEK WHEREAS, the Congress and President of the United. States of America have designated May 15 as Peace Officers' Memorial Day and the week in which May 15 falls as National Police Week; and WHEREAS, Police Officers protect and preserve life and property against crime and take personal risks in dealing with those who would threaten the peace of our community; and WHEREAS, Police Officers provide a vital public service; and WHEREAS, it is highly appropriate that the services provided by Police Officers be recognized and appreciated. NOW, THEREFORE, I, AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, State of Minnesota, with the consent and support of the Brooklyn Center City Council, do hereby proclaim the week of May 12 -18, 2002, as Police Week and that our Community joins with other cities to honor all Police Officers everywhere and call upon our citizens to recognize the dedicated public • service of the Police Officers of Brooklyn Center. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk • • City Council Agenda Item No. 10c 0 • MEMORANDUM DATE: May 8, 2002 TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Joyce Gulseth, Public Works Administrative Aide SUBJECT: Proclamation Declaring May 19 -25, 2002, Public Works Week in Brooklyn Center In accordance with the tradition of the American Public Works Association, those who work in professions that provide and maintain public facilities and services will be honored during National Public Works Week May 19 -25, 2002. The 2002 theme is "Committed to Our Communities." Public works employees are "everyday heroes" who face the challenges of improving the quality of life in our community The Public Works Department employs 39 full time and 19 seasonal employees in the five divisions of the Department — Engineering, Street Maintenance, Parks Maintenance, Public Utilities, and the Central Garage. All divisions work together as a team to provide high - quality service for people who live, work, and visit Brooklyn Center. While many of their tasks like plowing streets, mowing parks, putting up signs, pumping water, maintaining large equipment, and designing improvement projects are high profile, many tasks are completed almost unnoticeable except in their absence. Many people do not realize that many of the efforts of the department take place on overtime while everyone else is sleeping. It is not unusual for street or park employees to get called out in the middle of the night after a storm to clear fallen trees from the road, or utility employees to be called out to respond to a sewer backup. During special events like Earle Brown Days, the Dudley, or other tournaments, park maintenance employees put in a full day's regular work, and then work on those special events until the wee hours of the morning. Engineering technicians routinely work six days a week during the summer construction season. And street maintenance employees called in to plow or provide ice control routinely make their way to work over unplowed, unsalted streets. Our Public Works employees take great pride in their work. Attached for Council Consideration is a Proclamation Declaring May 19 -25, 2002, Public Works Week in Brooklyn Center. PROCLAMATION DECLARING MAY 19 -25, 2002 PUBLIC WORKS WEEK IN BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, public works services provided in our community are an integral part of our citizens' everyday lives; and WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of public works systems and programs such as engineering, water, sewers, streets and highways, parks, public buildings, and solid waste collection; and WHEREAS, the health, safety, and comfort of this community greatly depends on these facilities and services; and WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning, design, and construction is vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill of public works officials; and WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff public works departments is materially influenced by the people's attitude and understanding of the importance of the work they perform, NOW, THEREFORE, I, AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, State of Minnesota, do hereby proclaim May 19 -25, 2002 as "National Public Works Week" in the City of Brooklyn Center, and I call upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing our public works and to recognize the contributions which public works officials make every day to our health, safety, comfort, and quality of life. Date Mayor Attest: City Clerk City Council Agenda Item No. 10d e • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: ® RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING ALBERT HARTMANN IN RECOGNITION AND APPRECIATION OF HIS SERVICE TO THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, Albert Hartmann has been employed by the City of Brooklyn Center from June 30, 1969, through May 10, 2002, serving initially as part of the survey crew and most recently as Engineering Technician III; and WHEREAS, Mr. Hartmann has recently resigned from the City of Brooklyn Center to accept a new position; and WHEREAS, during his 33 years of service to the City of Brooklyn Center he has contributed in all areas of engineering such as the preliminary and construction surveying, construction inspection, the conversion from hand preparation of plans to AutoCAD plan preparation, and project design; and WHEREAS, during his tenure the City has undertaken a very successful neighborhood street reconstruction program to which he has made a significant contribution by his production of plans and by his customer service to many citizens and homeowners during the course O of the projects; and WHEREAS, Mr. Hartmann served the City of Brooklyn Center as a dedicated member of the Volunteer Firefighters Association in addition to his duties in the Engineering Department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, upon the recommendation of the City Manager, that this resolution be and hereby is adopted in recognition and appreciation of the many accomplishments and 33 years of service to the City provided by Albert Hartmann. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City Council Agenda Item No. 10e MEMORANDUM DATE: May 8, 2002 TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Joyce Gulseth, Public Works Administrative Aide SUBJECT: Resolution Expressing Appreciation for the Gift of the Brooklyn Center Lions Club in Support of Arbor Day Activities The Brooklyn Center Lions Club has presented the City a donation of one hundred fifty dollars ($150) in support of Arbor Day Activities. Eight years ago the "outdoor classroom" concept was introduced as an integral part of the Arbor Month celebration in Brooklyn Center. A multi -year plan was established to enhance our parks and increase awareness among the youth of our community of Arbor Month and the benefit of trees. As part of an ongoing project for Palmer Lake Ponds and Trail Improvements we are provided an opportunity to partner with Palmer Lake Elementary School for the second year for a planting project that involves 6 t ' grade students. This contribution to Arbor Day activities allows us to continue to provide this form of environmental education to the youth of our community. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR THE GIFT OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER LIONS CLUB IN SUPPORT OF ARBOR DAY ACTIVITIES WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Lions Club has presented to the City a donation of one hundred fifty dollars ($150,) and has designated it to be used to support Arbor Day activities; and WHEREAS, the City Council is appreciative of the donation and commends the Brooklyn Center Lions Club for its civic efforts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that 1. Acknowledges the donation with gratitude. 2. Appropriates the donation to the corresponding activity budget. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • e City Council Agenda Item No. 10f • e MEMORANDUM DATE: May 8, 2002 TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Joyce Gulseth, Public Works Administrative Aide 4 SUBJECT: Resolution Expressing Appreciation for the Gift of the Brooklyn Center Fire Relief Association in Support of the Adopt- A- Park/Trail/Street Program The Brooklyn Center Fire Relief Association has presented the City a donation of two hundred dollars ($200) in support of the Adopt- A- Park/Trail/Street program so we may continue to provide vests, trash bags, and.gloves for volunteers to use as they provide services to the community. With the volunteer efforts of thirty -eight groups or individuals, maintenance crews r ' ects. can devote more time and effort to other im p park ark P o J Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR THE GIFT OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT OF THE ADOPT- A- PARK/TRAIL /STREET PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Fire Relief Association has presented to the City a donation of two hundred dollars ($200,) and has designated it to be used to support the Adopt -a- Park/Trail/Street Program; and WHEREAS, the City Council is appreciative of the donation and commends the Brooklyn Center Fire Relief Association for its civic efforts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that 1. Acknowledges the donation with gratitude. 2. Appropriates the donation to the corresponding activity budget. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City Council Agenda Item No. 10g Member introduced the following resolution and moved its • adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING EARLE BROWN DAYS AS A CIVIC EVENT FROM JUNE 27 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2002 WHEREAS, the purpose of Earle Brown Days is to promote the City of Brooklyn Center, its people, and amenities; and WHEREAS, residents, the city community civic groups, and businesses participate in the annual civic celebration to demonstrate the vitality of the City of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, in order for Earle Brown Days, Inc. to schedule certain events requiring City- issued administrative land use permits, it is necessary for Earle Brown Days to be declared a civic event. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Earle Brown Days are declared a civic event from June 27 through June 30, 2002. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 0 e City Council Agenda Item No. 10h • • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its • adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING THE SCHEDULE FOR SIGN PERMIT FEES WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center adopted Resolution No. 99- 172 on November 8, 1999, relating to planning and inspection fees, including sign permit fees; and WHEREAS, the Building Official has reviewed the fees for sign permits and has developed a recommended rate schedule; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it appropriate to modify and update the fees for sign permits. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the schedule for sign permit fees be amended as follows: Sign Permit Fees Sign permit fees shall be collected before issuance of any sign permit required under the provision of the Sign Ordinance and shall be calculated according to the following: a. The fee for any permanent freestanding or non - freestanding sign five square feet in area or less not requiring a footing inspection shall be $25.00 • b. The fee for any permanent freestanding or non - freestanding sign over five square feet in area not requiring a footing inspection shall be $30.00 for the first 50 square feet of gross area or fraction thereof and $12.50 for each additional 50 square feet of gross area or fraction thereof. C. The fee for any permanent freestanding or non - freestanding sign five square feet in area or less requiring a footing inspection shall be $50.00. d. The fee for any permanent freestanding or non - freestanding sign over five square feet in area requiring a footing inspection shall be $25.00 plus $30.00 for the first 50 square feet of gross area or fraction thereof and $12.50 for each additional 50 square feet of gross area or fraction thereof. e. The fee for permits for the installation of any electrical wiring for any sign shall conform to the State Board of Electricity fee schedule and shall be obtained through the State Board of Electricity Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: • and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. e MEMORANDUM TO: Michael McCauley, City Manager FROM: Larry Martin, Building Official DATE: May 7, 2002 SUBJECT: Resolution Amending Permit Fees On the May 13, 2002 City Council agenda is a resolution amending the schedule for sign permit fees for freestanding signs. When a freestanding sign is installed, there are two inspections performed by the Inspectors. The current fee schedule does not allow the amount collected to cover the cost to the city to do two inspections. This resolution authorizes a permit fee of $25 when a second inspection is required, which reflects the cost to the city for e staff time to perform the second inspection. e I City Council Agenda Item No. 10i is adoption: Member introduced the following resolution and moved RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF ONE 1500 GPM CAF FIRE APPARATUS PUMPER AND TRANSFERRING ADDITIONAL FUNDS FROM THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CENTRAL GARAGE TO PROVIDE THE ADDITIONAL FUNDING TO PURCHASE THE FIRE APPARATUS WHEREAS, an appropriation of $239,120 has accumulated in the Central Garage Budget for the purchase of one (1) 1500 GPM Fire Apparatus; and WHEREAS, the Fire Relief Association has agreed to contribute $19,000 toward the purchase of this vehicle, representing the amount in excess of the estimated cost of $280,000 to replace the 1982 pumper; and WHEREAS, the following Bids were received for the purchase of said 1500 GPM Fire Apparatus pumper: Pierce Manufacturing $314,958 Trade -in 15,000 Price after trade $299,985 E -One $297,474 WHEREAS, E -One does not meet the specifications as published and has taken numerous exceptions to the bid specifications; and • WHEREAS, Pierce Manufacturing has met all bid specifications, and it is recommended that Pierce Manufacturing be awarded the bid for the fire apparatus. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Brooklyn Center as follows: 1. that the bid of E -One is rejected as being non - responsive to specifications. 2. that the Bid of Pierce Manufacturing is hereby accepted and the purchase of one(1) 1500 GPM Fire Apparatus in the amount of $299,985 is hereby approved. 3. that the $19,000 is accepted from the Fire Department Relief Association and the balance needed is transferred from the Central Garage Fire Equipment Replacement Fund. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member • and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager ® FROM: Ron Boman, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Fire Truck Bids DATE: April 25, 2002 On April 19, 2002, bids were opened for the replacement of engine 2, a 1982 American LaFrance pumper. We received two (2) bids for the new apparatus as listed below: Pierce Fire Apparatus $299,958 With Trade E -One Fire Apparatus $297,474 Although E -One submitted the low bid it does not meet the specifications that were published and made no effort to meet with me before the bids were opened to discuss the variances that were taken. The following are some of changes that E -One has taken, smaller frame rails (Chassis) 10.25 "verses the 13.38" that were called for, 15" Disc Brakes instead of 17" brakes as called for, smaller alternator 320 amp instead of 340 amp, no air -tool outlet, solid front axle instead of independent suspension front axle, smaller inside cab area (9 ") where the firefighters sit, there are also a lot of smaller items that also do not meet our specifications and E -One does not tell what size the hose bed will be which is very critical, as we specified in the bid specifications what was needed for this apparatus. It appears that they have bid a smaller cab and frame assembly which would reduce their cost by about $20,OOOto $25,000 less than the cab and chassis (frame) specified. The larger cab and chassis are very critical as fire apparatus are fully loaded to their maximum weight all the time, the frame we specified has a resistive bending movement (RBM) of 2,859,122 where the low bid was only 1,827,045, the higher the RBM the less the truck will twist and move as it is driven over uneven ground, curbs as it responds to fires and emergency. As the fire department retains its fire apparatus for 20 years it is very critical that the apparatus be built to our specification so it will last for the full 20 years and we don't have compartments that will twist because of the smaller frame and have to be rebuilt before the apparatus has to be replaced. I am recommending that we award the bid to Clarey's Safety Equipment the Pierce dealer for this area as their bid meets the specification. Pierce also does the entire service warrantee once we purchase the apparatus, while E -One has their service work done by an independent repair shop. Because the cost of the pumper came in at $299,985, I have asked the fire department to contribute $19,000 toward the purchase of the pumper, which they have agreed to do. • • City ouncil Agenda Item No. l0' Y g J MEMORANDUM TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Tom Bublitz, Community Development Specialist DATE: May 9, 2002 SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Application for an Opportunity Grant Through the Livable Communities Demonstration Program The owner of the Northbrook Shopping Center has approached the City with a concept proposal to redevelop the Northbrook Shopping Center site. The proposal would completely reconfigure the site and create a mixed use development of retail and housing. The project is only a concept at this time, but would be a striking redevelopment of the site. While maintaining a neighborhood retail function, an additional goal of the project is to create a destination shopping site attracting shoppers from a larger area than the immediate neighborhood. The Metropolitan Council through its Livable Community Demonstration Account has made funds available for Opportunity Grants to provide project specific and site specific land use plans. The application for • funding to the Metropolitan Council under the Livable Communities Demonstration Account would provide a means to take the project from the concept stage to a point where a decision whether or not to move forward to an implementation phase could be made. The application before the City Council is an Opportunity Grant application for the 2002 funding cycle. The Metropolitan Council grant program provides funds at a one to one local match for project planning activities. The components of the grant request are: • Market study and financial feasibility to define market demand for proposed retail and housing to assist in making decisions on retail /housing mix, housing affordability levels and to determine the financial feasibility of the project. • Phase I and Phase I1 Environmental Studies to define and delineate environmental issues on the site. • Develop site plan for the project site to reflect market /financial study data. The site plan would indicate building /amenity locations, parking, design elements relative to zoning and subdivision requirements. • Develop and conduct public review process for project. The total estimated cost for the planning activities is $60,000 with the Metropolitan Council paying $30,000 and the City providing $30,000. Sources for the City's share of the project could include tax increment funds and in -kind contributions such as staff time committed to the project. The project application, included with this memorandum is due to the Metropolitan Council by May 15 with awards to be made July 24, 2002. Also included with the memorandum is a Resolution Authorizing • Application for an Opportunity Grant Through the Livable Communities Demonstration Program. Member introduced the following resolution and is moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR AN OPPORTUNITY GRANT THROUGH THE LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is a participant in the Livable Communities Act's Housing Incentives Program for 2002 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is therefore eligible to make application for funds under the Livable Communities Demonstration Account; and WHEREAS, the City has identified a proposed project within the City that meets the Demonstration Account's purpose /s and criteria; and WHEREAS, the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and WHEREAS, the City certifies that it will comply with all application laws and regulations as stated in the contract agreements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota agrees • to act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the opportunity grant application submitted on May 15, 2002. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to apply to the Metropolitan Council for this funding on behalf of the City of Brooklyn Center and to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Date Mavor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Livable Communities Demonstration Account of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund OPPORTUNITY GRANT APPLICATION - 2002 COVER SHEET Project Name Little Asia Applicant City of Brooklyn Center Project Location (city) City of Brooklyn Center Address (street boundaries) 1980 57 Avenue North (Logan and 57 Avenue North in Brooklyn Center Project Size (acres) 8.6 Acres Contact Person - NAME Tom Bublitz ADDRESS 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center MN 5543 y 0 PHONE 763- 569 -3433 FAX 763 - 569 -3494 E -MAIL tbublitz @ci.brooklyn - center.mn.us PROJECT SUMMARY Northbrook Shopping Center is a retail strip center located in Brooklyn Center and built in the late 1950's and early 1960's. The overall objective of the project is to develop a new mixed use retail and residential use and to incorporate a distinct identity for the site to create a destination shopping area while maintaining a neighborhood retail service function with the addition of housing. ous ng. The specific purpose of the Opportunity Grant Request is to prepare a planning study for the project which would include a market study feasibility Ian Y, tY� p lan , including a public review process, to move the project from the concept stage to a project ready to begin implementation. 1. The Site a. Describe the current land uses on the site. The project site is occupied almost entirely by the Northbrook Shopping Center complex, consisting of three buildings (two traditional retail strip center type buildings and one large free - standing building currently housing an Asian grocery store). One of the two strip center buildings houses an oriental market, Laundromat, beauty salon, marshal arts academy, dollar store, restaurant, fashion and fabric store and Salvation Army Thrift store. Two of the store fronts in this building are vacant. The second building contains a beauty salon, nails shop, Asian take out food store, Subway restaurant and a Cash and Pawn. Two of the store fronts in the second building are vacant. Also on the development site is a free standing auto repair business occupying a former gas station site. In addition to the businesses on the Northbrook site, there is one retail /commercial use on the northeast corner of the development site at the corner of Logan and 57 Avenue. This is the Acme Typewriter business. b. Identify adjacent land uses, development and transit services • The triangular project site is bounded by Logan Avenue North on the east, 57 Avenue North (County Road 10) on the south and Trunk Highway 100 on the west. East of the project site along Logan, the uses are single family and multiple family. The site is bounded by 57 Avenue North on the south, which is occupied by retail /commercial uses. Presently the site is served by MTC route 94GK and route 22, with bus stops along 57 Avenue North and Logan Avenue. c. Describe potential additions or changes to the land uses the proposed project may generate. The project will create a new reconfiguration of the retail space and add housing, including free standing residential buildings and rental units constructed over the new retail space. The redevelopment of this site will create a strikingly distinct design, intended to attract shoppers and visitors outside the immediate neighborhood, while still maintaining a neighborhood retail center. • 2. Describe the Project a. Project goals • The primary goal is to redevelop a neighborhood retail site that is currently underutilized and is approaching the later stages of its useful economic life. • The City's Comprehensive Plan designates the Northbrook Shopping Center as a potential redevelopment site specifying that "like Humboldt Square, this neighborhood shopping center could benefit from a redevelopment. While its current retail use is appropriate, this location also may be suitable for a more comprehensive mixed use redevelopment that would include the surrounding retail and residential uses ". • Redevelopment of the Northbrook site will help to serve as a catalyst to additional redevelopment in the area. The site will serve as a possible link to future projects occurring in the existing opportunity site around the Brookdale area. • The project will promote redevelopment using existing infrastructure. The housing component will make use of existing transit services to the site. Also, a primary goal of the project is to create a retail shopping area promoting pedestrian access, which will utilize transit as transportation to the site. • One of the options to be examined in the planning of the project is the feasibility of managing storm water by keeping it on site through an i infiltration process, thereby minimizing the impact on the existing storm water system. b. Tasks and Outcomes Task - market study and financial feasibility. Outcomes - define market demand for proposed retail and housing to assist in making decisions on retail /housing mix, housing affordability levels and project costs and design. Determine financial feasibility of project. Task - Phase I and Phase II Environmental Studies. Outcomes - define and delineate environmental issues on the site. Task - develop site plan for project site. Outcomes - site plan would reflect market /financial study and public review and provide the starting point for implementation of the project. Site plan would take the concept plan to the next stage indicating building /amenity locations, parking, design elements relative to zoning and subdivision requirements. Task - conduct public review of project. Outcomes - provide process for public review of project activities to assure community support. • c. Timeline • Completed Task Start Date End Date by Whom? f Market study and October 2002 January 2003 *See below financial feasibility Phase I and Phase II Phase I October 2002 November 2002 *See below Environmentals Phase II November 2002 December 2002 Develop site plan January 2003 March 2003 *See below Develop process for and January 2003 March 2003 Project team conduct public review of project *These tasks will be performed with assistance of professional firms specializing in their respective areas of expertise. No consultants have been selected but the City has worked with several local firms on other projects, that have expertise in the tasks indicated. • 3. Process and Partnerships • a. Locallnvolvement Communitv Officials and Staff • At the direction of the City Council and City Manager, city staff will coordinate the project planning components including soliciting proposals for consultants to be hired to work on various components of the planning process. • Key city departments to be included in the project will be City Manager's office, Community Development department (including planning and zoning and building official) and Engineering. • The primary role of city officials and staff will be to assist the owner of the Northbrook Shopping Center to move the development plan for the Northbrook site from the concept stage to a point that is ready for project implementation. • It is anticipated city staff would continue to work with the owner beyond the planning phase to provide input on final site and building plans, required zoning and subdivision approvals and other input related to the physical and financial aspects of the development property. Public Involvement • Input from the community will be solicited through a formal process. It is anticipated group meetings will be held during the planning process to provide public input into the land use and site plan process. The review process will be developed formally as part of the planning process and will be facilitated by the Project Team. It is anticipated a public involvement process similar to that used in the Brookdale Area Opportunity Site, will be used. 1 0 - taff or b. Project Team Role or Tasks to Consultant Name Qualifications be Undertaken Michael McCauley Mr. McCauley is the Brooklyn Center City Manager. General project Mr. McCauley has initiated numerous successful oversight redevelopment projects in the City of Brooklyn Center including residential, commercial and industrial redevelopment. Brad Hoffman Mr. Hoffman is the City's Community Development General project Director. He has 25+ years experience in economic supervision. and housing development. Mr. Hoffman has been responsible for managing several redevelopment projects in the City including major housing, commercial and industrial redevelopment projects. Tom Bublitz Mr. Bublitz is the City's Community Development Lead staff person to Specialist with over 12 years experience in coordinate project redevelopment projects. Mr. Bublitz has managed activities. several redevelopment projects in the City including residential, commercial and industrial development. Ron Warren Mr. Warren is the City's Planning and Zoning Specialist. Mr. Warren will be Mr. Warren has 25+ years experience in planning and coordinating the zoning administration with substantial experience in planning and zoning redevelopment projects including implementing planned process and review unit development projects. for this project. Todd Howard Mr. Howard is the City Engineer and has 15+ years Mr. Howard will be experience in the field of civil engineering. Mr. Howard coordinating the has experience in designing, coordinating and planning engineering and complex public improvement projects including public improvement preparation of feasibility reports for engineering process for this projects and experience with public improvement project. projects from feasibility stage throuqh construction. In addition to City staff, Mr. Dan Vang, representing the owner and WCL Associates Inc., the concept architects for the project, will coordinate project activities on behalf of the owner. • c. Partnerships • A brief summary of the partnerships to be created by the project include a partnership between the City and the Metropolitan Council to incorporate Smart Growth strategies into the planning process for the project. The owner of the Northbrook center initiated the concept proposal for the project. It is therefore extremely important to create a partnership between the owner, City and Metropolitan Council that will meet the needs of not only the community and Metropolitan Council project criteria but also the needs of the owner and their goal to implement the project concept they have created. With regard to additional partnerships that may occur during the project, the housing component of the project may provide opportunities for additional groups to be involved in the housing portion of the project including the possibility of non - profits. 4. Funding Request • a. Total Amount Requested $30,000 b. If fewer dollars are available than requested, how would you prioritize the components in your request. The first priority for the project is the completion of a market study and financial feasibility with the second priority being the preparation of a site plan that would bring the project from concept stage to one that is ready for implementation. c. How would a smaller grant affect your ability to move the project forward? There is a significant amount of work to be undertaken to move from the concept stage to a point where development could begin. With a smaller grant the time period to refine the project from concept to implementation could increase substantially. d. What could not be accomplished in the project but for receipt of an Opportunity Grant? The project would likely not go forward. • • ATTACHMENT A OPPORTUNITY GRANT APPLICATION FINANCIAL SUMMARY - SOURCES AND USES Total Amount Requested: $30,000 Opportunity Grant Amount of Task or Activity Funds Requested Local Funds Source Market Study and $10,000 $10,000 *See below Financial Feasibility Phase I and II Environmental $6,000 $6,000 See below Site Plan ` $12,500 $12,500 *See below Neighborhood Review Process I $1,500 I $1,500 f *See below *Local matching funds would be a combination of Tax Increment Funds and in -kind contributions which could include staff time spent on the project. • I • ATTACHMENT B Ilk � a � z z � z 73rd AwN M j�� HE=i �] M� V66th 73rd A�eN dd s EE EE 69th Aye N - � � � - � � � � _ m � 69th Ave N AwN (/�� 63rd A� N v lSL'llSV - J _' Lam➢ _ _ 7 - _ Il ii ��.' m� i. _ I�t� ➢. . _ __ OEM 9 Bass lake Rd 1 t�3 , 57111 Ave N MEE bk•.'r _ ,11, 53rd Aw N R. MWk - m W w ® 0 loon z000 3000 4000 5000r'eet C lake 8—e Rd L _ - N LEGEND: La+e 0 Single-Family Residential Office /Service Business �] Two - Family Residential 0 Parks and Open Space 0 o x Medium - Density Residential 0 Industrial High - Density Residential Public and Semi - Public z Retail Business 0 Undeveloped Lake /Creek O ter. Neighborhood Boundary and Number Figure 2 -1 � o k l y n_ -� C_,e m e c�-- Land Use Pattern, 1996 ATTACHMENT C SITE LOCATION MAP i x I ° j � Y o� Z XN Q o N T -- 58TH - AVE-N- - - - - -58 X N N X w 'a NI I c #j y I ► m a p z I J 57TH AVE-N--.- X s X X - - - --.- 57TH AVE N S 57TH AVE N i E- <-- BUS ROUTES`'22 & 94GK --> --� -- 57tH AVE N - - -- - - -- 57T N co N X - BUS STOP ~ - I D { m °� I Nz nw ma I I > w y SEE ATTACHED FOR AERIAL PHOTO OF PROJECT SITE wr.., . . � :��`' �. r « �k . '�¢.' !• t o '.j `�'d •'�` � ,.�` .'t: ' """ 7,kti! nL:d irru7 a PL o wl �P - a $ �� >{ �� �.''.'�",.' - a.n, 'A'<.x«` aw +t€a�.« c,. c c...w s. Ir?r°*• ' -�.': . 'nkvs> "� 1a35iC4 •• 'tgts°� ywmra,.m.,>,�.�,yl ,�� �,P %5:�,. !' �u ' � �Y q ��� � �aT '� � f -;w ` "�" � � irII• „� - +711 f }.� � � :1 . �, ti5,.. �+�. a� „� ' x 2 ra, �- .: .. r}.; s . t o , r * • ,� ",'� - �" >,.. �, �.Y �,� eE¢:..ba .:tecR." -r F: i' a"tt � y} . #.'a ri s,x . `'t �"'•., „r. fi ,�.4��5 `"��'�"^'r �� � '"a ', h -`, ^ ° .e ;�+, f +f :A -t, fi: `^n - »t ,'"+•, - %;r, +ry'_ ' i 5 �.�a►� VP - z 'ia' ?+� A ME VVIN , ' . ' 0 � Pa Site Site (see page 5) Understa � Site A 353 ~. (8.08 Ac see page 6) the Fish" Pond Central Creek If k Building Data `---'-�--' Commercial Area 72,090 SF - Town House � Residential Units 12OUnits '~~~^ ~~^~ (see page 5) Dragon-Eye Maze Surface Parking 270 Stalls ee page 8) " unueUruu/m Comme ru/^x/H 42 ou*m ^~ Underground Residential Parking 240 Stalls - P 58th AVENUE NORTH . - A �_ —Nine Dragon Wall � o Resa an Grocery y - ~ - ' �- Yin & Yang ~�" � LA Apartments ) *� } - ~ "'"'"'°,'"^"' � X commercial � | Of �p --__.~ / ) Ap^'tm ncw . 0 50 lob 15d ^r^r ' with first-floor } ^' comme ^ 57th AVENUE NORTH Asian store facade Asian Archway at the Stone Ta�iBridge ' /oea page 3\ �> main entrance of Little (aae page 3) > Asia (see page 1) � CL ' - '~ | ATTACHMENT E • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR AN OPPORTUNITY GRANT THROUGH THE LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is a participant in the Livable Communities Act's Housing Incentives Program for 2002 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is therefore eligible to make application for funds under the Livable Communities Demonstration Account; and WHEREAS, the City has identified a proposed project within the City that meets the Demonstration Account's purpose /s and criteria; and WHEREAS, the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and WHEREAS, the City certifies that it will comply with all application laws and regulations as stated in the contract agreements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minlesota agrees • to act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the opportunity grant application submitted on May 15, 2002. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to apply to the Metropolitan Council for this funding on behalf of the City of Brooklyn Center and to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. s City Council Agenda Item No. lOk OMT City of Brooklyn Center A Millennium Community MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Kragness, Councilmembers asman, Nelson, Peppe, and Ricker FROM: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager DATE: February 20, 2002 SUBJECT: May 20, 2002, Worksession The May 20, 2002, Worksession was scheduled to begin the budget discussions for the 2003 Budget. Since the Legislature has not finalized its approach to the remaining State budget deficit projection, we have not been in a position to formulate and outline the 2003 revenue projections. Thus, I would recommend that the May 20, 2002, Worksession be cancelled. We do have a Worksession scheduled for June 17, 2002, with the auditor. I would anticipate combining a discussion of the 2003 Budget process with that Worksession, following the presentation and discussion with the auditor. • 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 (763) 569 -3400 City Hall & TDD Number (763) 569 -3300 FAX (763) 569 -3434 FAX (763) 569 -3494