HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006 05-08 CCM Study Session MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
STUDY SESSION
MAY 8, 2006
CITY HALL — COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session and was called to order by Mayor
Myrna Kragness at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Myrna Kragness and Councilmembers Kathleen Carmody, Kay Lasman, Diane Niesen
and Mary O'Connor. Also present were City Manager Michael McCauley, Assistant City
Manager/Director of Operations Curt Boganey, Public Works Director /City Engineer Todd
Blomstrom, Community Development Director Brad Hoffman, and Deputy City Clerk Camille
Worley.
CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF AGENDA ITEMS AND QUESTIONS
Councilmember Niesen discussed her changes to the April 24, 2006, Regular Session and Work
Session minutes as submitted prior to the meeting.
Councilmember Carmody stated her correction to the April 24, 2006, EDA minutes.
DISCUSSION OF WORK SESSION AGENDA ITEMS AS TIME PERMITS
MISCELLANEOUS
Councilmember Niesen inquired about the request from the Boy Scout Troop and if a response
would be sent from the City Council. Mayor Kragness responded that she prepared a Mayoral
Proclamation in response to the letter.
DISCUSSION OF MATERIALS FOR CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATES
Councilmember Carmody stated she reviewed the document and does not wish to amend it.
Councilmember O'Connor stated the document is acceptable to her at this time.
Councilmember Lasman stated after the Primary Election, it is important that the City Council
candidates get an un- tabbed agenda packet for the next City Council meeting so that they are
informed on the issues at hand. Councilmember Carmody responded the candidates should
receive agenda packets after they are elected to office. Mayor Kragness added that it would be
appropriate for the candidates to get the agenda, however those who are elected should get the
05/08/06 1
full agenda packet. Mayor Kragness stated the importance that all candidates attend the City
Council meetings prior to the election. Councilmember Carmody stated the candidates can now
access the agenda on the City's website. Mayor Kragness agreed that the agenda, available on
the website is sufficient.
It was the consensus of the City Council to continue using the current materials for Council
candidates and notify the candidates that the agenda for City Council meetings are available on
the City's website.
DISCUSSION OF REQUESTED SENIOR HOUSING ON 60 & BROOKLYN BLVD.
City Manager Michael McCauley suggesting that since the applicant is now present, the City
Council could ask questions if they arise during the Work Session rather than waiting until the
Informal Open Forum.
Community Development Director Brad Hoffman requested that the City Council consider this
type of development on the property. He explained that the Comprehensive Guide Plan calls for
residential with retail uses along Brooklyn Boulevard. He stated the concern is of the size of the
property and if the area can support the density. He explained that 30 units are proposed on the
site, which is the equivalent to an R -7 zoning. He stated it is not a high rise development;
however, it is a three story building with parking. He stated staff requests direction to pursue or
not pursue the application for the use on this site.
Mr. Hoffman stated the proposal would require rezoning and a Planned Unit Development
agreement.
Mayor Kragness stated concern with parking. Mr. Hoffman responded staff is also concerned
with parking. He explained that the City Ordinance requires two parking stalls for every one unit.
Mr. McCauley stated the size of the proposal may be too small for a Planned Unit Development;
however, if the City Council expressed interest in the proposal, a great number of policies would
v t iv time from the Planning Commission
have o be researched, requiring extensive g , staff and the
applicant.
Mr. Hoffman discussed the good reputation of the applicant and stated the use on the site may be
appropriate; however, there is concern regarding the density. Mr. McCauley added that the issue
is density in respect to the Comprehensive Guide Plan.
Mayor Kragness stated many changes would have to be made for this proposal to be approved.
Mike Bjerksett, President of Nation Handicap Institute, stated small apartment buildings such as
this is their specialty and they have 11 similar developments in the metropolitan area. He stated
density and parking are the two main concerns. He stated senior housing often has unique zoning
in communities. He discussed the needs of low income seniors, which this site is great for.
Councilmember Carmody inquired about the height of the building. Mr. Bjerksett stated the
building would be three stories tall and would sit on the site nicely. He displayed a drawing of
05/08/06 2
the proposed building. He stated senior housing does not require much green space.
Doug Mayo, Consultant of Nation Handicap Institute, discussed parking and stated the average
age of the occupants is 73, many of which have given up their driver licenses. He stated 30
parking stalls would be excessive, 15 parking stalls would be adequate. He stated if the proposal
was to be moved forward, 30 parking stalls would be proposed and a variance would be
requested.
Mr. Bjerksett stated door -to -door transportation for the residents would be available. He stated
the units would be one to two bedrooms for residents and a caretaker. He stated all units would
be handicap adaptable and elevators would be present in the building. He discussed other
developments in Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Robbinsdale, and New Brighton. He stated there is
usually a waiting list for these units. He discussed the financing program that is only available
once per year and stated he has been considering this property for three years. Mr. Mayo added
that a number of sites in Brooklyn Center have been considered and this one has been deemed
the best because of the nearby services.
Councilmember Carmody inquired about financing from the City. Mr. McCauley responded the
i would not be financing an
project would be full funded b HUD and the applicant; the City g Y
P J Y Y PP
portion of the project.
Councilmember Niesen stated concern for the property changing hands and not being used for its
proposed use. She stated it is a good idea; however, she is concerned about staff time needed to
pursue the use. Mr. Bjerksett stated the grant application is due in June and notification of award
would not be until October 1 He stated they would return to the City Council with an
application in October, if the funds were granted.
Mayor Kragness stated concern for the traffic on Brooklyn Boulevard due to problems at other
senior housing developments in Brooklyn Center.
Mr. McCauley stated it would be primarily Planning and Zoning Specialist Ron Warren's time
used on the project.
ADJOURN STUDY SESSION TO INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL
Councilmember Carmody moved and Councilmember Niesen seconded to close the Study
Session at 6:45 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
RECONVENE STUDY SESSION
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember O'Connor seconded to reconvene the Study
Session at 6:46 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
05/08/06 3
Mr. Bjerksett discussed the traffic surrounding other metro developments. He discussed a
regulatory agreement that requires the property to be kept as low income housing for 40 years.
He stated the residents must be 62 years of age or older.
Councilmember Carmody stated she is not opposed to increasing density for low income senior
housing.
Councilmember Niesen stated she would like to speak to Mr. Warren about the project before
she would be able to agree.
Mr. Bjerksett explained that they need to know if the City Council is in favor of, neutral, or
opposed to the proposal so that they know to proceed or not. He explained that if the City
Council was in favor of entertaining the proposal, a purchase agreement contingent on approval
would be drawn up and the HUD application would be made. He stated the property taxes would
be discounted because it is low income seniors, however taxes paid would still amount to
approximately $40,000 to $45,000 per year.
Councilmember Niesen stated concern for loss in property taxes and potential law suits because
of previous proposals for the property.
A poll was taken of the City Council as to their stance on the proposal:
Councilmember O'Connor - Opposed.
Councilmember Lasman - Neutral, would prefer to see a more appropriate use such as office or
service.
Councilmember Carmody — In Favor.
Councilmember Niesen — Neutral.
Mayor Kragness — Opposed, due to the traffic pattern and a recent death of a senior.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Carmody seconded to close the Study
Session at 6:58 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously. V7 �
City Clerk Mayorl�
05/08/06 4