HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 09-07 CCP Work Session f
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
7:00 P.M.
CONFERENCE ROOM B
1. Discussion of Brookdale.
2. Discussion of Draft Capital Improvement Plan,
3. Miscellaneous.
M
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 1, 1999
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Diane Spector, Director of Public Wor
SUBJECT: Draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 2000 -2004
Attached is a copy of the draft CIP for the period 2000 -2004. This Capital Improvement Program
includes capital projects in the following areas: water, sanitary, and storm drainage utilities; sidewalks
and trails; parks; government buildings; and streets.
This draft is presented for initial review. The tables in the beginning of the CIP show overall
potential spending for capital improvements under consideration, by type of project and by funding
source. The report proceeds area by area, discussing background and detailing general short and long
term planning. Each section then details the funds available to construct the improvements, and what
impact the proposed improvements would have on the fund balances. Finally, the appendix to the
report presents the five year plan of projects in detail.
In general, the proposed CIP:
• completes the cycle of water and sanitary sewer facility improvements;
• through the storm drainage utility provides for improvements to the Palmer Lake basin and
Twin Lakes;
• continues the Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Program;
• reconstructs and beautifies Brooklyn Boulevard;
• rehabilitates the trails in the Palmer Lake basin;
• continues the program of systematically improving parks, focusing on park shelters and
lighting;
• makes timely improvements at Centerbrook Golf Course; and
• provides for constructing a Community Services addition to the Community Center and
reconstructing the Civic Center parking lots.
Changes between Last Year's CIP and This Year's
Water Utility
Routine well maintenance was as an recate orized operating expenditure and moved from the CIP to
g p g ex P
the budget.
Sanitary ewer Utility
ty
The replacement of lift stations #8 and #9 was moved from 1999 to 2000.
f
Page 2
Storm Drainage Utility
Several improvement projects were identified as a result of the Palmer Lake Study. Two projects
were added, one in 2000 and one in 2001. The $450,000 total shown would provide for the creation
of a detention pond in East Palmer Lake Park and the replacement of some of the storm drainage
channels with storm sewer redirecting drainage to the new pond. A new channel would be dredged
from the new pond into the lake. This would eliminate much of the sedimentation and over
vegetation which is now occurring on the fringes of the eastern basin, keeping water from its natural
flow into the lake. Remaining channels would be dredged. A new treatment pond would be
constructed in the southwest corner of the basin when the 70th Avenue trunk outlets into the basin.
This new regional pond would provide treatment for the entire area upstream, which includes the
69th/Brooklyn Boulevard redevelopment area.
A project called "Twin Lake Improvements" is shown in 2003. There is no specific project identified
with this, it 'is simply a "placeholder" to reserve resources should the current Twin Lakes Study
identify improvement projects which would improve water quality in the lakes.
Sidewalks and Trails
New projects were added for the Palmer Lake Trail System. As a part of the pond improvement in
East Palmer Lake Park, it is proposed to relocate the bicycle trail through East Palmer Lake Park. The
paved trail would meander through the park instead of traveling behind the ballfield outfield fence.
The trail behind the fence, which is settling into the swamp, would be converted into a chipped
walking trail. The paved trail would rejoin the existing trail at the south end of the developed park.
South of the developed park, there is a section of trail which is often under water because it has
settled considerably. This segment would be removed and rebuilt with a geotextile fabric and
lightweight aggregate base. Additional funding identified would provide for a trail overlay.
Parks
The park plan has been revised somewhat, with new soccer facilities proposed at two parks. These
revisions to the plan will be reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission at its September
meeting.
The major park improvements proposed for 2000 include replacement of existing shelter buildings
with picnic shelters at East Palmer, Happy Hollow, and Firehouse Parks; replacement of park and trail
lighting at Central, Happy Hollow, East Palmer, Freeway, and Firehouse Parks; rehabilitation of the
tennis courts at West Palmer; creation of a soccer field at Freeway Park; and several revisions to
Garden City Park related to construction of a storm water treatment pond there. In general, at Garden
City a new pond would be created at the edge of Shingle Creek, in approximately the current location
of the hockey rink. The hockey and pleasure skating rinks would be relocated, necessitating removal
of the abandoned wading pool, which now is a large sandbox. A soccer field would be created in the
open area north of the shelter building. The bicycle trail along the creek would be rerouted.
Page 3
Other adjustments were made to the plan, primarily to reestimate costs and rearrange improvements to
stay within the $225,000- $230,000 annual range of expenditures.
Government Buildings
The parking lot rehabilitation at the Civic Center was moved from 1999 to 2000. The $2 million
rehab project that had been shown for several years was amended to the more realistic $3 million.
Replacement of the radio system was pushed back from 2001 to 2004 to more accurately portray
when radio system adjustments might have to be made.
Streets
A signal project was added for 2000, the addition of signals on Xerxes and 55th and 56th. This was a
recommendation of the Brookdale Traffic Study, and would be paid for by the Brookdale developer.
The Brooklyn Boulevard project shows the most current estimate of cost and revenue sources. The
73rd Avenue project was moved from 2001 to 2000, based on our discussions with the City of
Brooklyn Park. The commercial streets 47th/48th/Dusharme, which have been proposed as
improvements several times but which were not supported by the property owners, were added to
2002. These streets are in poor condition and have drainage problems. The neighborhood next to
Middle Twin Lake was also added to 2002. The timing is intended to coincide with the TH 100
reconstruction. The little neighborhood of Halifax/Grimes/France west of Brooklyn Boulevard was
moved from 2000 to 2001 to try to even out workload.
Under Enhancements, the Xerxes Avenue Streetscape was moved from 2000 to 2002. This project is
intended to provide streetscaping such as ornamental lighting, colored concrete, landscaping, etc.
from TH 100 north to I94/694. No specific plans have yet been made. In the area of Brookdale,
obviously those improvements would be designed to complement redevelopment in the area. In the
neighborhood to the north, the streetscaping would likely be confined to the center median, and would
likely consist of ornamental street lighting, decorative benches, and some plantings. The
neighborhood would participate in the design process.
The Brooklyn Center Industrial Park Streetscape was moved from 2002 to 2004. Again, no specific
plans have yet been made. The intent is to make improvements that are similar and complementary to
the Farm area enhancements, and which provide a transition from that district as one travels along
Shingle Creek Parkway into the Palmer Lake area and 69th Avenue Parkway.
Specific Points for Discussion
The CIP continues to move at an aggressive pace. During this five year period funds available for
improvement projects are very much "right to the bone" until additional funds now dedicated to debt
service are freed up beginning in 2005 to supplement these funds. The utility funds are either very
close to or just below their target cash balances, and will take three or four years to climb up to those
minimum levels. The regular Municipal State Aid account is in the red due to several large projects
Page 4
that have been completed in the last several years. We are cash - flowing State Aid projects through
the Local State Aid account until we catch up at the end of this five year period. As more utility funds
become available at the end of this five years to take on larger neighborhood street projects, the
general fund contribution to the projects is no longer adequate to pay for the City's share of the larger
projects.
However, even with these constraints we are able to fund significant projects and continue to stay on
mostly on track with our capital projects goals. The parks will continue to be systematically
renovated, utility improvements made, and street projects completed at a 4 -5 miles per year pace.
It is important to note that this assumes that the City's fiscal capacity to contribute funds towards
these projects continues at least at the same rate as in the past few years. Should that capacity be
reduced, then the CIP would have to be reevaluated to consider 1) doing smaller projects; 2)
increasing contributions from existing sources of funds (such as increasing assessments, increasing
contribution from utilities, etc); or 3) finding additional sources of funds.
i
DRAFTq/;./,, APITAL
IMPROVEMENT
P ROGRAM
2000 -2004
z:>
,, ■asap■ .....,....
r
14 Z 4 �, ir�i i � � � ihIIIM�I III I
JR' � IP� f i �lifi V ai iii, lilt I � i'u, i I
six
Street Improvements Government Buildings
ILL
Park Improvements Public Utility Improvements
City of
Brooklyn Center
2000 -2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
Introduction ................. ............................... 1
Public Utilities
Water Utility ................ ............................... 11
Sanitary Sewer Utility ............ ............................... 13
Storm Drainage Utility ............ ............................... 16
Streets, Sidewalks, and Trails
Streets ................ ............................... 18
Sidewalks and Trails ............. ............................... 21
Parks, Public Facilities, and Capital Equipment
Parks................ ............................... 22
Centerbrook Golf Course .......... ............................... 25
Government Buildings ............ ............................... 26
Miscellaneous Equipment .......... ............................... 27
TABLES
Table 1: Summary By Functional Area ................................. 5
Table 2: Summary By Fund ......... ............................... 7
Table 3: 2000 Projects ............. ............................... 9
Table 4: Summary By Function and Fund .............................. 10
Table 5: Water Utility Projected 5 Year Balance .......................... 12
Table 6: Water Utility Facilities Future Maintenance or Replacement Needs ........ 13
Table 7: Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund Projected 5 Year Balance ................ 15
Table 8: Sanitary Sewer Utility Facilities Future Maintenance or Replacement Needs .. 15
Table 9: Storm Drainage Utility 5 Year Projected Balance .................... 17
Table 10: Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Program Progress ........ 19
Table 11: Municipal State Aid Fund 5 Year Projected Balance ................. 20
Table 12: General Fund Contributions to Street Projects 5 Year Projected Balance .... 20
Table 13: Local State Aid Fund 5 Year Projected Balance .................... 21
Table 14: Parks Facilities Future Maintenance or Replacement Needs ............ 24
Table 15: Golf Course Fund 5 Year Projected Balance ...................... 25
Table 16: Capital Improvement Fund 5 Year Projected Balance ................ 28
FIGURES
Figure 1: By Functional Area ........ ............................... 6
Figure 2: By Funding Source ........ 8
APPENDIX
Table A: Water Utility ............ ............................... Al
Map A: Water Facilities ..... ............................... A2
Table B: Sanitary Sewer Utility ...... ............................... A3
Map B: Sewer Facilities ..... ............................... A4
Table C: Storm Drainage Utility ..... ............................... A5
Map C: Drainage Facilities .............................. A6
Table D: Sidewalk and Trail Improvements ............................. A7
Map D: Sidewalk & Trail Facilities ............................. A8
Table E: Park Improvements ........ ............................... A9
Map E: Park Facilities ............................... All
Table F: Public Buildings Improvements .............................. Al2
Map F: Public Buildings .... ............................... A13
Table G: Street Improvements ...... ............................... A14
Map G: Street Improvement Projects ........................... A19
2000 -2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
INTRODUCT DRAFT"12A, ION
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a planning document. It is intended to serve as a summary
of the physical improvements proposed to carry out the City's strategic and comprehensive plans. The
CIP presents a schedule of improvements and an evaluation of the community's financial capabilities,
as well as its goals and priorities. In such a way, the community can be assured that it is adequately
prepared to meet the demands on its financial resources in the coming years.
No document or planning process, however, can anticipate all contingencies or opportunities.
Certainly not all of the capital improvements to be undertaken during this time period are known at this
time. Rather, the information contained in these tables represents a best estimate of improvements and
their costs based on present knowledge and expected conditions. The CIP is a flexible planning tool that
provides a means to determine which projects are of highest priority. The City can be responsive to
opportunities because it has available a comprehensive listing of its needs which can be evaluated and
reprioritized, if necessary to take into account new or changing situations.
For the purposes of this report, a capital improvement can be defined as any major non - recurring
expenditure or any expenditure for physical facilities of government. Typical expenditures are the cost
of land acquisition or interest in land; construction of buildings or other structures; construction of
roads, utilities, or park improvements; and pursuit of community development activities. Most capital
improvements are typically funded from revenue sources other than the general fund. Maintenance of
these improvements is primarily funded by the general fund.
The CIP is directly linked to the goals and policies, land use and community facility sections of the
Comprehensive Plan, since these sections indicate general policies of development, redevelopment, and
the maintenance of the community. Consequently, the primary objective of the CIP is to integrate the
specific goals, policies, and recommendations contained in the City's plan with its capability to pay for
and maintain capital improvements.
Meeting Strategic and Annual Goals
The City's Comprehensive Plan presents the framework for programming, development and
redevelopment within the community. This Comprehensive Plan identifies several general community
goals.
► Carve out a unique and desirable niche in the Twin Cities are by capitalizing on physical
attributes such as: location, highway and bus access; sound and diversified housing stock;
vibrant mixed -use center; attractive Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor; and interconnected park and
open space system.
Proiects consistent with this goal are:
► Completion of park upgrades including playground equipment replacement, shelter renovations
and replacement, and addition of amenities and linkages to regional parks.
► City participation in a Hennepin County street improvement project providing a major upgrade
to Brooklyn Boulevard, improving safety, increasing capacity, and coordinating with
redevelopment and enhancement projects.
{
► Gain an increased sense of unity and place by: retrofitting the public elements of the
neighborhoods; focusing and linking these neighborhoods toward an intensified, mixed use
retail- office- residential -civic core; making major street corridors and other public spaces highly
attractive; and celebrating diversity.
Projects consistent with this goal are:
► The continuation of a systematic program of neighborhood street and utility
improvement projects designed to upgrade neighborhood infrastructure and improve the
appearance of Brooklyn Center neighborhoods,
► Landscaping and enhancement projects on Brooklyn Boulevard and the three loops:
commercial, neighborhood, and park; and
► A focus on the redevelopment of mature commercial sites by assisting in the
construction of infrastructure improvements, such as regional storm water ponds.
► Develop a positive public image and strong community esteem.
Projects consistent with this goal are:
► . Construction of an addition to the Community Center and rehabilitation of the existing
facility to provide attractive and functional places for community gatherings as well as
a community services center.
► Provide cooperative leadership and sound management.
Projects consistent with this goal are:
► Continued maintenance and repair of the City's infrastructure, such as: painting and
repairing well houses and water towers; rehabilitating sanitary sewer lift stations;
repairing storm sewer outfalls; repairing sidewalks and retaining walls; sealcoating
streets and trails; and replacing and expanding lighting at city parks.
These major projects focus on maintaining a high quality of life and neighborhood focus and on
redeveloping the community. The program provides for the continuation of the high level of public
services which Brooklyn Center has come to expect and to enjoy.
Projects in this CIP are also consistent with the City Council's 2000 Goals. These include:
Goal 1:
Proiects consistent with the goal are:
Goal 2:
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 2
Projects consistent with the goal are:
Goal 3:
P roiects consistent with the goal are:
Goal 4:
Proiects consistent with the goal are:
Goal 5:
Proiects consistent with the goal are:
Goal 6:
Proiects consistent with the goal are:
Goal 7:
Proiects consistent with the goal are:
Goal 8:
Proiects consistent with the goal are:
The Plan
The detailed tables of proposed improvement projects are organized by functional area for example:
water system improvements, park upgrades, street projects, etc. The CIP begins with a series of
summary tables and graphs showing the overall level of expected need and funding requirements. A
summary of the proposed capital improvements by functional area for the five year period of 2000
through 2004 is shown in Table 1. A summary by funding source is shown in Table 2. Table 3 shows
the projects proposed for consideration in 2000. All costs shown are best estimate of future costs based
on 1999 estimated costs.
It must be understood that the scheduling of various improvements, especially those that are related to
development or redevelopment, can change substantially from year to year. However, the overall level
of improvements shown in this CIP represents the best judgment of what is necessary to maintain
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 3
infrastructure in good condition, and to provide those facilities which are necessary to support public
services through the year 2004.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 4
� TABLE 1 - Capital Improvement Program - Summary by Functional Area
�
�
PUBLIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS:
Water Utility Capital Projects 352,218 O 40,000 O O O
Sanitary Sewer Utility Capital Projects 402.563 400.000 O O 150,000 O
Storm Drainage Utility Capital Projects 1.909,500 250,000 200,000 O 200,000 O
SUBTOTAL $2.664.281 $650,000 $240,000 $0 $350.000 $0
S0BxW\LK/TRA|L|K8PROVEMENTS:
Off-Street Trails 160.000 100.000 25.000 25.000 O D �
Sidewalks 75.000 O 25.000 O 29.000 O �
SUBTOTAL *235.000 $100.000 $50.000 *25.000 *25.000 *O
PARK|K8PROVEK8ENTG $234.663 *237.200 $235.880 $274.500 u287.000 $222500 �
PUBLIC BUILDINGS *8.268.341 $3.200.000 $O $U *O $750.000
STREET IMPROVEMENTS:
Signals 30.855 250.000 O O 0 O
State Aid Street Projects 1.384.980 2.084.680 229.260 O O U
Neighborhood Street Projects 2.487.937 3.590.718 3.348.385 5.269.191 3.718.880 4.184.600
Commercial Street Projects 621.891 O O D 0 O
Landscaping 14.000 O O 100.000 O 250.000
SUBTOTAL $4.539.663 $5.925.393 s3.577.625 $5.369.191 $3.719.880 $4.434.600
������Y� T �1� ��� ���� $10,112,593 �� ��� ��� �� ��� ���1 �� ��� ��� $5,407,100
~°. ~. ".~^° TOTAL n ��x- *^ .~,,=�� . ,=��= ��', ^==,°-°-~~ +~°,°~~=/~~= . *-n,== " ,==.,
�
City of Brooklyn Center
Capital Improvement Program, 2000 -2004
By Functional Area
Water Sanitary Sewer
Other Street 4% 2% Storm Drainage
Improvements 7%
44% Parks
AV
2%
AW
Public Buildings
30%
State Aid Streets Trails & Sidewalks
10% 1%
Total 5 Year Proposed Expenditures = $29,683,489
TABLE 2 - Capital Improvement Program - Summary by Fund
02-Sep-99
WATER UTILITY $424,108 $888,909 $676,190 $785,865 $595,180 $778,170
SANITARY SEWER UTILITY $916,020 $937,700 $535,740 $785,865 $745,180 $778,170
STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY $527,186 $920,560 $649,530 $548,404 $725,280 $560,350
MSA-REGULAR $690,105 $1,057,050 $0 $743,460 $0 $0
MSA- LOCAL ACCOUNT $168,727 $205,045 $145,860 $225,000 $75,000 $300,000
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $1,841,574 $1,412,405 $991,975 $1,499,254 $1,098,195 $1,408,308
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND ($831,663) $3,426,200 $227,600 $229,493 $287,000 $739,500
GENERAL FUND: STREET CONSTR $662,485 $391,024 $684,930 $806,342 $856,045 $834,602
GOLF COURSE FUND $13,000 $11,000 $8,000 $45,000 $10,000 $8,000
LIQUOR STORE FUND $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TIF FUNDS $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS $6,796,390 $0 $0 $7 $0 $0
OTHER GOVERNMENTS/FUNDS $3,934,017 $862,700 $183,400 $0 $0 $0
GRAND TOTAL $15,941,948 $10,112,593 $4,103,225 $5,668,691 $4,391,880 $5,407,100
City of Brooklyn Center
Capital Improvement Program, 2000 -2004
By Funding Source
Sanitary Sewer Storm Drainage utility Special
Utility 6% Assessments
Water Utility 9% 17%
11%
Golf Course Fund
<1% _ GO Bonds
17%
MSA Regular
6%
MSA Local
3%
General Fund Capital Other Funds
6% Improvements Fund 15%
Other Funds Includes State
10% Grants, ISTEA, etc.
Total 6 Year Proposed Expenditures = $29,683,489
TABLE 3 - Capital Improvement Program - 2000 Projects
m
urd ...... .. .......
N .. ........
": ....... .....
M.M.W M.
Water
None $0
Sanitary Sewer
Replace Lifts #8 and #9 400,000 $400,000
Storm Drainage
Palmer Lake improv 250,000 $250,000
Sidewalks & Traits
Palmer Lake Trail 100,000 $100,000
Parks
Central 41,500 $41,500
Centerbrook Golf Course 11,000 $11,000
Firehouse 41,800 $41,800
Freeway 21,800 $21,800
Garden City 10,000 $10,000
Happy Hollow 29,300 $29,300
Kylawn/Arboretum 5,000 $5000
East Palmer 41,800 $41:800
West Palmer 35,000 $35,000
Public Buildings
Community Services 3,000,000 $3,000,000
Center Addition
Civic Center parking lots 200,000 $200,000
Streets
Xerxes/55th & 56th signals 250,000 $250,000
Brooklyn Boulevard roadway 99,000 182,100 203,500 7,200 400 $492,200
Brooklyn Boulevard enhancmnts 862,700 377,780 $1,240,480
Garden City Central 351,230 831,195 289,080 75,000 630,520 474,180 670,160 272,210 $3,593,575
73rd 59,000 232,320 (51,960) 56,320 56,320 $352,000
Previous years' projects 39,794 436,650 (477,875) (1,431) ($2,862
GRAND TOTAL 1 $391,024 $873,700 1 $1,140,195 I $3,426,200 I $1,057,050 $205,045 I $888,909 $937,700 $920,560 $272,210 I $10,112,593
r ,
TABLE 4 - Capital Improvement Program - Summary By Function and Fund
PUBLIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS:
Water Utility 352,218 0 40,000 0 0 0
Sanitary Sewer Utility 402,563 400,000 0 0 150,000 0
Storm Drainage Utility 525,483 250,000 200,000 0 200,000 0
NSP
TIF /Other Govts /Capital Improvements Fund 1,384,017 0 0 0 0 0
SUBTOTAL $2,664,281 $650,000 $240,000 $0 $350,000 $0
SIDEWALK/TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS:
TRAILS
Local State Aid 110,000 100,000 25,000 25,000 0 0
Trail grant 50,000
SIDEWALKS
Local State Aid 75,000 0 25,000 0 25,000 0
SUBTOTAL $235,000 $100,000 $50,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0
PARK IMPROVEMENTS
Capital Projects Fund 221,663 226,200 227,600 229,500 287,000 214,500
Golf Course Fund 13,000 - 11,000 8,000 45,000 10,000 8,000
SUBTOTAL $234,663 $237,200 $235,600 $274,500 $297,000 $222,500
PUBLIC BUILDINGS
Capital Improvements Fund (1,053,326) 3,200,000 0 (7) 0 525,000
Water Utility 12,639 0 0 0 0 112,500
Sanitary Sewer Utility 12,639 0 - 0 0 0 112,500
Other Governments 2,500,000 0 0 0 0 0
GO Bonds 6,796,390 0 0 7 0 0
SUBTOTAL $8,268,341 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $750,000
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
MSA - Regular 690,105 1,057,050 0 743,460 0 0
MSA - Local (16,273) 105,045 95,860 200,000 50,000 300,000
Water Utility 59,251 888,909 636,190 785,865 595,180 665,670
Sanitary Sewer Utility 500,818 537,700 535,740 785,865 595,180 665,670
Storm Drainage Utility 1,703 670,560 449,530 548,404 525,280 560,350
Special Assessments 1,841,574 1,412,405 991,975 1,499,254 1,098,195 1,408,308
Special Assessment Constr Fund 662,485 391,024 684,930 806,342 856,045 834,602
TIF Revenue 800,000 0 0 0 0 0
Other Governments 0 862,700 183,400 0 0 0
SUBTOTAL $4,539,663 $5,925,393 $3,577,625 $5,369,191 $3,719,880 $4,434,600
GRAND TOTAL I $15,941,948 1 $10,112,593 I $4,103,225 $5,668,691 I $4,391,880 ( $5,407,100
1. PUBLIC UTILITIES
a. Water Utility
The City's water utility provides service to 8,900 connections in Brooklyn Center. The City also has
cooperative agreements with the adjacent cities of Brooklyn Park and Robbinsdale to provide service to
about 100 border customers in those cities where Brooklyn Center has mains but those cities do not.
About 12 homes in Brooklyn Center receive their water from the City of Minneapolis.
The water utility finances all costs for water supply, distribution, operations and maintenance, and
capital improvements. Revenues are generated through water use charges, connection charges, and
special assessments. Revenues are also generated through the leasing of space on water towers to
cellular phone companies for antennas. Use charges are adjusted annually based on a rate study
analysis which reviews operations, maintenance, and construction costs and projected water demand.
Substantial cash expenditures have been made from the water utility in the past few years. These
expenditures are primarily cyclical in nature, such as painting and repairs to the three water towers and
replacement of the SCADA system. In 1999, this cycle of larger scale improvements was completed,
and it will be several years before items such as tower repainting come up again. The only significant
annual expenditures during the "off cycle" years are associated with neighborhood street projects. In
most cases, these represent repairs to the system, rather than substantial replacements. However, in
2000 -2002, the utility will likely replace most or all of the water main in the Garden City
neighborhood, which historically has had water quality problems and maintenance issues. There are a
few other neighborhoods which are known to have "hot" or corrosive soils where substantial
replacements are likely to be required, such as the "Tangletown" area of the southeast neighborhood.
As a result of these large capital expenditures, the balance in the fund has been reduced considerably.
The target balance in this fund is $1.7 million, and projects and utility rates have been identified which
would sustain that balance.
5 Year Improvements
Short term activities relate primarily to routine maintenance, and improvements associated with
Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Program.
1. Continue the routine well inspection and maintenance program to assure the continued
functioning of the existing wells.
2. Rehabilitate the exterior and make a small addition to well house ##4 to enclose electric facilities
which are currently on the exterior of the building. This well house is adjacent to the
Evergreen Park School playground.
3. Replace existing mains as necessary and make various water distribution system improvements
to assure the system's ability to deliver needed capacities to all portions of the City during peak
demand periods and for fire protection as a part of the Neighborhood Street and Utility
Improvement Program.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page I I
Table 5
WATER UTILITY FUND PROJECTED 5 YEAR BALANCE
8116199
Starting $2,950,020 $3,029,009 $2,599,051 $2,366,537 $2,025,184 $1,921,924
Balance
Revenu
Investment interest $162,251 $151,522 $1269,474 $118,327 $101,259 $96,096
User fees 1,092,000 1,128,000 1,164,000 1,200,000 1,236,000 1,272,000
Other 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000
ExDenditures
Capital outlays $424,108 $888,909 $676,190 $785,865 $595,180 $778,170
SCADA replacement (119,246)
Wellhouse rehabilitation 225,000 40,000
Tower painting/repair 234,064
Street improvements 59,251 888,909 636,190 785,865 595,180 665,670
Other (bldg projects) 25,039 112,500
Debt service (NSP) 56,300 56,300 56,300 56,300 0 0
Operating costs DRAFT budget $804,854 $874,271 $900,499 $927,514 $955,340 $984,000
Ending $3,029,009 $2,599,051 $2,366,537 $2,025,184 $1,921,924 $1,637,850
Balance
Loniz-term Improvements
Long-term improvements require detailed evaluation of capacity following the extensive distribution
system improvements constructed in the past several years, and future water quality regulations.
1. In 1998, the periodic Water System Analysis study last conducted in 1989 ("The Black
and Veatch study") was updated. The study concludes that Brooklyn Center's water
supply system is adequate, and that no new wells or elevated storage need to be
constructed. The emergency water interconnect with Brooklyn Park which was
constructed in 1997 is capable of supplying all the City's average day demand should
that need arise. An emergency generator capable of starting up a well was purchased
in 1998, and electric control modifications were made to several of the wells at the time
the adjustable speed drives were installed to accommodate the generator. Water
modeling confirms that under most emergency scenarios, as long as the integrity of the
distribution system is not breached, water adequate for serving average water heeds and
providing fireflow would be available.
The study also updated the estimated cost of an iron and manganese removal water
treatment plant, should the City desire to construct such a facility. At this time there is
no regulatory reason to do so, and alternative methods such as chemical treatment have
kept complaints about these naturally-occurring minerals to a minimum. Iron and
manganese are not aesthetically pleasing in the water, but no health hazards have been
identified as a result of their presence. It is estimated that a plant to remove iron and
manganese, including an additional 1 MGAL ground storage, would cost between $6.7-
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000-2004 Page 12
8 million. A suitable site in the City's well field is available, and is reserved for such
A future use, and the water distribution system has been designed to accommodate a
future plant with few adjustments.
2. In 1997 -98, adjustable speed drives were installed on the pumps at several of the City's
primary wells. A revised operations plan to manage energy use and maximize
production was implemented. A final component of the revised operations plan is to
amend the City's periodic well maintenance program to provide major maintenance
based on running time rather than every 6 years. This component is still being
developed, and is expected to be implemented in 2000.
3. The following is a listing of major water utility facilities and future major maintenance
or replacement needs:
Table 6
WATER UTILITY FACILITIES FUTURE MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT NEEDS
lLII`Y:::; < > :;:; »:; :; .: ;::::::» :: S iR:13 < YEAYtz: >;<' .` : ':::;::: _ .....Rl ...._ ....... ......................._....... .
.. . ..
Well #2 (B Blvd) 1959 2004: possible routine maintenance Routine maintenance as necessary
Well #3 (at Tower #2) 1961 2001: possible routine maintenance Routine maintenance as necessary
Well #4 (Evergreen W) 1961 2005: possible routine maintenance Routine maintenance as necessary
2001: exterior rehab
Well #5 (70th/Camden) 1966 2002: possible routine maintenance Routine maintenance as necessary
Well #6 (69th/Emerson) 1965 2000: possible routine maintenance Routine maintenance as necessary
Well #7 (Evergreen E) 1970 2004: possible routine maintenance Routine maintenance as necessary
Well #8 (Camden/Woodb) 1977 2000: possible routine maintenance Routine maintenance as necessary
Well #9 (Camden N) 1984 2005: possible routine maintenance Routine maintenance as necessary
Well #10 (Camden S) 1990 2003: possible routine maintenance Routine maintenance as necessary
Tower #1 (France) 1958 Inspect coatings in 2004; rehab in 15 -20 years
Tower #2 (Dupont) 1960 Inspect coatings in 2004; rehab in 15 -20 years
Tower #3 (Centerbrook) 1973 Inspect coatings in 2004 rehab in 15 -20 years
SCADA 1998 Periodically upgrade, replace when
technologically obsolete
Note: Starting in 2000, routine maintenance of wells will be scheduled based on running time rather than every six years.
b. Sanitary Sewer Utility
The City's sanitary sewer utility provides service to 8,780 customers in Brooklyn Center. The City
also has cooperative agreements with Brooklyn Park and Robbinsdale to provide service to about 100
border customers in those cities where Brooklyn Center has mains but they do not.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 13
v The sanitary sewer utility finances all costs for operations and maintenance and capital improvements
through sewer use charges, connection charges and special assessments. Charges are adjusted annually
based on a rate study analysis which reviews operation, maintenance, and construction costs, as well as
sewage treatment charges from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (formerly
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission), which provides wastewater treatment for the entire Twin
City metro area. MCES charges account for about 3/4 the annual operating expenditure of the utility.
Substantial cash expenditures have been made from the sanitary sewer utility in the past few years.
These expenditures are primarily cyclical or one time in nature. In the past several years the utility
has replaced the two primary lift stations, number 1 in Garden City Park and number 2 on Lyndale
Avenue, and relined or replaced where possible a substantial amount of corrugated metal pipe which
was used for some major interceptors in the late 1950s. In 1999, this cycle of larger scale
improvements was completed, and it will be several years before items such major replacements come
up again. Generally, the only significant annual expenditures during the "off cycle" years are
associated with neighborhood street projects, for the replacement of mains as necessary.
As a result of these large capital expenditures, the balance in the fund has been reduced considerably.
The target minimum balance in this fund is $950,000. While current projections show the fund falling
below that minimum int he short term, in the long term the utility does bring the fund balance back up
to an acceptable level.
5 Year Improvements
Short term activities relate primarily to routine maintenance, and improvements associated with the
Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Program.
1. Continue routine sewer televising and lift station inspection and maintenance program.
2. Replace lift stations #8 and #9, which have reached the end of their useful life. Lift #8 will be
relocated across Bass Lake Road from its current location adjacent to Shores Drive.
2. Replace any segments of sewer which have been identified as needing replacement by the
television inspection program, and as necessary with the Neighborhood Street and Utility
Improvement Program. It has been determined that almost one -half of the sanitary sewer pipe
in the City is of the ungasketed, clay tile variety. This type of material is highly susceptible to
root and groundwater infiltration. On average about half the sewer pipe in the Neighborhood
projects has had to be replaced because of extensive root infiltration. Many individual services
have also been replaced for the same reason. The projects identified in this 5 year plan are all
in areas with known instances of root infiltration, so it is expected that replacements will be
substantial.
3. Replace or reline the lift #9 forcemain from lift #9 (on the west side of Shingle Creek Parkway,
across from the Brookdale Square shopping center) south along Shingle Creek Parkway, under
CR 10, and across the Brookdale parking lot to the Brookdale trunk main.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 14
Table 7
SANITARY SEWER UTILITY FUND PROJECTED 5 YEAR BALANCE
8116199
Starting $1,162,701 $642,232 $696,284 $911,192 $935,469 $1,047,866
Balance
Revenues
Investment interest $63,949 $47,112 $31,885 $45,560 $46,773 $52,393
User fees 2,413,902 2,423,924 2,498,193 2,572,801 2,648,560 2,725,769
Other 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Expenditures
Capital Outlays $916,020 $937,700 $535,740 $785,865 $745,180 $778,170
INTRAC replacement 202,563
Replace lifts #8 & 9 400,000 150,000
River line 200,000
Street improvements 500,818 537,700 535,740 785,865 595,180 665,670
Other (bldg projects) 12,639 112,500
Operating costs draft budget $344,562 $370,284 $384,530 $399,360 $414,799 $430,875
MCES charge 1,438,737 1,410,000 1,395,900 1,409,859 1,423,958 1,438,197
Ending $942,232 $696,284 $911,192 $935,469 $1,047,866 $1,179,786
Balance
Lone -Term Improvements
Long term improvements relate specifically to replacement of major facilities. The following is a list of
those facilities and their maintenance or replacement needs.
Table 8
SANITARY SEWER UTILITY FACILITIES
FUTURE MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT NEEDS
;;)♦ACi'�'1': >;'::: >> :> >':; >> .`.;; >::: `<;3'�t8['JIh'�:'':;.5�'EfiR:: `.:.: :._`::::::I:Q1ViG'17�It1�::. ;
Lift Station #1 (Garden City) 1997 Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
Lift Station #2 (Lyndale) 1993 Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
Lift Station #3 (Palmer Lake) 1982 Maintain & rehab as necessary. Review condition in 2012
Lift Station #4 (Queen & 55th) 1990 Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
Lift Station #5 (Indiana & 56th) 1990 Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
Lift Station #6 (France & LakeB) 1988 Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
Lift Station #7 (Willow Lane) 1990 Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
Lift Station #8 (58th & Shores) 1967 2000: replace Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
Lift Station #9 (SCP) 1969 2000: replace Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
2003: replace forcemain
Lift Station #12 (Freeway) 1985 Maintain & rehab as necessary. Review condition in 2015
SCADA 1998 Upgrade as necessary, replace when obsolete
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 15
C. Storm Drainage Utility
The City's storm drainage 'n and a series of storm water detention
r e s stem consists of storm sewer piping Y g Y PP g
ponds. The Local Water Management Plan has established a goal of constructing new and /or replacing
old storm sewers plus adding additional storm water ponds to provide adequate drainage for a five year
storm. The Plan also requires private developments to provide on -site drainage system and storage
necessary to treat storm water and retain all drainage on -site for up to six hours after a five year storm.
Substantial capital improvements have been undertaken in the years since the storm drainage utility
fund was established in 1991. Through revenue bonds the fund financed the acquisition of property
and the construction of Bob Cahlander Park, which includes a 4 acre regional storm water detention
and water quality pond. These revenue bonds will be retired in 2005. The first phase of the Shingle
Creek Regional Pond is complete, with the second phase to be constructed in Winter, 1998 -99. This
project is funded by a $2 million grant from the state DTED, TIF, and the City of Minneapolis. The
neighborhood projects which have been undertaken in the past several years have had very substantial
storm drainage components. As a result, the fund has a very low reserve balance, but is expected to
achieve its minimum balance of $540,000 within a few years.
The storm drainage utility finances all costs for storm drainage system operations and maintenance and
capital improvements. Capital improvement bonds and special'assessments supplement the SDU.
Charges are adjusted annually based on a rate study analysis which reviews all costs relating to the
storm drainage system.
5 Year Improvements
Short term activities include both major drainage improvements and improvements associated with the
Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Program.
1. Complete storm drainage improvements as necessary with the Neighborhood Street and Utility
Improvement Program. Major trunk improvements have been made by several previous
projects. Trunk storm sewer work in this 5 year plan is expected on 63rd Avenue from
Brooklyn Boulevard to Brooklyn Drive. Detention and treatment ponding would be
constructed in several areas of Garden City Park, adjacent to Shingle Creek. This ponding
would pretreat stormwater before it is discharged into Shingle Creek.
2. Construct two major improvements in the Palmer Lake basin. The first would create a new
detention and treatment basin in East Palmer Park, eliminating the open channels and dredging
a new, shorter channel into the lake and relocating the bicycle path. The second would dredge
out and expand the existing drainage channel in the southwest corner of the basin to create a
regional treatment pond for the 70th Avenue trunk storm sewer.
3. Coordinate with the city of Minneapolis the completion of the Shingle Creek Regional Pond.
As Brookdale Shopping Center redevelops, its utility and drainage plans will have to be
coordinated with the Regional Pond design.
4. Consider improvements to the Twin Lake basin which may be recommended by the water
quality study underway by the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 16
Table 9
STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY 5 YEAR PROJECTED BALANCE
8117199
Starting $424,713 $527,171 $288,384 $357,380 $558,264 $616,513
Balance
Revenu
Misc operating $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
User fees $988,000 $1,040,000 $1,092,000 $1,118,000 $1,144,000 $1,170,000
Interest 21,236 24,408 11,853 19,147 29,191 32,104
DTED Grant 1,117,767
Mpls for SCRP 266,250
Expenditures
Capital outlays $1,911,203 $920,560 $649,530 $548,404 $725,280 $560,350
Structure improvements 50,000
Misc studies 29,500
Street improvements 1,703 670,560 449,530 548,404 525,280 560,350
Shingle Creek Reg Pond 1,830,000
Water quality projects 250,000 200,000 0 200,000
Debt service $238,957 $240,460 $240,950 $241,100 $240,540 $239,250
Operating costs 160,635 162,175 164,377 166,759 169,123 171,671
Ending $527,171 $288,384 $357,380 $558,264 $616,513 $867,345
balance
Lone -term Imnrovements
The Phase II study which expanded upon the Local Water Management Plan has identified numerous
deficiencies and opportunities for improvement. As more funds become available when the revenue
bonds used to construct Cahlander Park and Pond are retired, a more detailed program of water quality
and structural improvements will be developed. Of particular concern are strategies to improve water
quality in Upper and Middle Twin Lakes, and to complete what is expected to be a series of
improvements in the Palmer Lake basin. Potential regional ponding opportunities have also been
identified, as well as a series of structural improvements
2. STREETS, SIDEWALKS, AND TRAILS
Improvements to streets, sidewalks, and trails are funded from a variety of sources. The largest of
these are the Special Assessment Construction Fund, special assessments, the various public utilities,
Municipal State Aid, and the Local State Aid Fund. The sources of funds for the Special Assessment
Construction Fund are: the General Fund; special assessment revenue bonds; special assessments; and
excess funds transferred from bond repayment funds being closed out. The Municipal State Aid Fund
is supported by gas tax revenues which are apportioned to the state, counties, and cities to provide for
the construction, maintenance, and reconstruction of a network of roadways known as the State Aid
System. About 21 miles of City streets are designated MSA streets, and the City receives about
$830,000 annually for these improvements. Finally, the Local State Aid Fund consists primarily of
excess funds available when special assessments on a state aid project and MSA reimbursement exceed
the cost of the project. The LSA Fund is used primarily to finance sidewalk and trail improvements,
aesthetic enhancements, and the City's portion of commercial street projects.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 17
a. Streets
The City is responsible for maintaining just over 100 miles of streets; about 80 miles are classified as
neighborhood streets, and just over 21 miles as Municipal State Aid streets. Capital improvements
generally include mill and overlay improvements and total reconstruction.
The Pavement Management Program conducted by Braun Intertec in 1992 has been used to help
identify the City's street reconstruction needs. From the results of this analysis and an ongoing review
of utility needs, a plan to reconstruct or rehabilitate as necessary the City's streets has been developed.
This plan has been designated the Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Program.
When this program began in 1994, it was anticipated that reconstructing or rehabilitating the City's
streets could take about 20 years, at a rate of 4 -6 miles of streets per year. On further analysis, it is
likely that financial considerations will not allow that pace to be sustained continuously. Accordingly,
it is expected that annually between 4 and 4.5 miles can be reconstructed until 2005. In 2005, 2006,
and 2007, debt on previous street improvement bonds will be retired, and the property tax levy
dedicated to servicing that debt can be redirected to the "pay as you go" projects. Realistically, after
this second five year program is complete, it will likely take about 15 years to complete the remainder
of the City.
The policies guiding the designation of streets to be improved are as follows:
1. Improvements proceed on a neighborhood basis, rather than piecemeal and strictly on "need."
This approach has the benefits of a) minimizing construction cost by confining improvements to
one area rather than multiple sites throughout the city; b) approaching drainage needs on an area
wide basis; and c) allowing for more efficient construction administration and inspection.
2. Brooklyn Center has historically had two methods of identifying "neighborhoods ": planning
neighborhoods, and park service districts. These are fairly large areas, which often do not make
a suitable base for assessing infrastructure needs. To retain its primary emphasis as one of
infrastructure rehabilitation, for the purposes of the Neighborhood Program, storm drainage
areas are the basis of identifying neighborhoods. However, in many cases "natural"
neighborhoods do not conform precisely to drainage areas, so the boundaries of an improvement
area might be amended slightly to define a broader area. It may also for various reasons be
prudent to construct improvements to only a portion of a neighborhood at one time.
3. Priorities are established as follows:
a) Areas with multiple needs;
b) Improvements which could immediately reduce operating costs;
C) Areas petitioned for by a majority of the property owners;
d) Areas which would complete regional improvements; and
e) Improvements which could benefit from being coincident with redevelopment.
The following table details progress in past years and projected for the coming 5 years on meeting
neighborhood infrastructure improvement needs.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 18
Table 10
NEIGHBORHOOD STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROGRESS
I Major Projects I Local MSA I Total I I
1985 -1993 I 1.35 4.08 5.43 1 5%
1994 Northwest; James/Knox, 53rd to 55th 1.66 0.25 1.91
1995 Woodbine; Freeway Blvd; Humbgldt, 69th to 73rd 2.71 1.80 4.51
1996 Orchard East; 69th; Logan/James/Knox/57th; Xerxes/53rd 5.51 2.06 7.57
1997 Orchard West; France, 69th to 73rd 4.81 0.50 5.31
1998 Bellvue; Lee /68th; James/67th; John Martin Dr 3.22 0.77 3.99
1999 Southeast; Earle Brown Dr; 66th/Camden 4.27 0.44 4.71
1994 -1999 22.18 5.82 28.00 27%
2000 Garden City Central; 73rd, Humboldt to Camden 3.23 0.94 4.17
2001 Garden City North; Halifax/Grimes/France 3.48 - 3.48
2002 Garden City South; Northport West; Middle Twin 4.53 1.50 6.03
2003 Tangletown; Happy Hollow 5.07 0.36 5.43
2004 Palmer East; Shingle Creek Pkwy 4.88 0.89 5.77
2000 -2004 I I 21.19 I 3.69 ( 24.88 124%
2005 -2009 I I 22.81 I 6.09 I 28.90 128% I
1 2010 -2013 I I 14.70 I 1.88 ( 16.58 116%
TOTAL I I 82.23 I 21.56 I 103.79
5 Year Improvements
1. Work cooperatively with Hennepin County to accomplish the widening and enhancement of
Brooklyn Boulevard from 65th to 71st Avenues.
2. Complete over three years Neighborhood improvements in the Garden City area, that is the
residential area between Brooklyn Boulevard and Shingle Creek, from CR 10 to I -694.
3. Complete Neighborhood improvements in Tangletown, which is the streets from 53rd to Lilac
Drive, west of Logan to Lions Park, and in the Happy Hollow neighborhood.
4. Jointly with Brooklyn Park, reconstruct 73rd Avenue from Humboldt Avenue east to Camden.
5. Complete Neighborhood improvements in the neighborhood west of Northport Park, and in the
Middle Twin Lake neighborhood, north and west of TH 100 and France Avenue.
6. Complete Neighborhood improvements in the East Palmer neighborhood between Palmer Lake
and Humboldt Avenue, north of 69th Avenue.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 19
7. Consider several landscaping and "streetscaping" projects to enhance the appearance of the
City and promote neighborhood unity and sense of place.
8. Install new traffic signals at 55th and 56th Avenues at Xerxes, to control traffic generated by
the remodeled Brookdale Shopping Center.
Table 11
MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUND 5 YEAR PROJECTED BALANCE
8/16/99
Starting Balance $137.727 1 ($370.720) 1 ($746.962) 1 ($302.707)1 ($598.181) 1 ($150.942)
Revenues
Intergovernmental $810,982 $830,000 $830,000 $830,000 $830,000 $830,000
Expenditures
Capital Outlays $690,105 $1,057,050 $0 $743,460 $0 $0
France Avenue 161,987
69th Avenue 245,221
Logan/57th 393,751
John Martin/Earle Brown Dr 47,328
Earle Brown Dr 107,448 12,206
73rd, Humboldt to Camden 232,320
Brooklyn Boulevard 99,000
Neighborhood streets 128,121 319,773 743,460
Transfers $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000
Debt service 307.560 290.956 295.745 292.014 292.761 297.850
Ending balance ($138.956)1 ($746.962)1 ($302.707 ($598.181)1 ($150.942)1 $291.2081
Table 12
ANALYSIS OF GENERAL FUND CONTRIBUTIONS NEED FOR STREET PROJECTS
8/16/99
Starting Balance I $166.6651 $132.3501 $407.4001 $363.8791 $196.5471 ($29.688)
evenues
Special assmnt fund interest $9,170 $7,280 $22,410 $20,010 $10,810 ($1,630)
General fund contribution 619,000 619,000 619,000 619,000 619,000 619,000
Expenditures
Capital Outlays $662,485 $351,230 $684,930 $806,342 $856,045 $834,602
James/Knox/57th 39,794
Orchard West 106,263
Southeast 556,222
Garden City Central 351,230
Halifax/Grimes /France 135,535
Garden City North 549,395
Garden City South 501,392
Northport West 164,310
Middle Twin Lake 140,640
Tangletown 856,045
Palmer East 834.602
Ending Balance $ 132.3501 $407.4001 $363.879 $196.5471 ($29.688)1 ($246.920),
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 20
Long -term Improvements
1. Continue the rehabilitation and reconstruction of residential streets, under the Neighborhood
Street and Utility Improvement program.
2. Continue improvements under the Municipal State Aid and commercial street programs. These
improvements may be coordinated with Neighborhood projects, or may be stand- alone.
b. Sidewalks and Trails
A comprehensive sidewalk system which serves all major activity areas and corridors of pedestrian
traffic has been established. Only a few segments of this system remain to be completed. In addition,
the City has developed a plan for development of a comprehensive trail system to provide recreational
trails for pedestrians and transportation trails for bicyclists. Both on- street and off - street trails are
being developed, and integrated into the regional trail system which serves the Twin City metropolitan
area. Where feasible, trail construction is being coordinated with other construction projects to assure
lowest cost development of this system. Funding for sidewalk and trail improvements is provided by
two accounts within the Municipal State Aid Construction fund. Activities included in the CIP are:
5 Year Improvements
1. Continued maintenance and repair of existing sidewalks and trails. The City owns and
maintains about 35 miles of sidewalks, and about 12 miles of bicycle /pedestrian trails.
2. Rehabilitation of the Palmer Lake Trail, including raising settled portions.
3. As a part of the Brooklyn Boulevard projects, sidewalks from 65th Avenue to the north City
limits will be reconstructed. An off - street trail will be added from the Park and Ride south of
I- 94/694 along the west side to 69th, where it will cross the street to the east side, and continue
on to Noble, where it will continue up Noble as an on- street bicycle route.
Table 13
LOCAL STATE AID FUND 5 YEAR PROJECTED BALANCE
8116199
Balance
e ( $1,974,702 1 $1,964,5851 $1,857,770 1 $1,758,940 1 $1,371,8901 $1,365,480
Ba 1
Revenues
Investment interest $108,610 $98,230 $92,890 $87,950 $68,590 $68,270
DNR Trail Grant 50,000
Exnenditurer
Capital Outlays $168,727 $205,045 $191,720 $475,000 $75,000 $50,000
Sidewalks 75,000 0 25,000 0 25,000 0
Trails 110,000 100,000 25,000 25,000
Street improvements (291,273) (454,835) 95,860 450,000 50,000 50,000
Brooklyn Boulevard 275,000 559,880 45,860
Ending $1,964,5851 $1,857,7701 $1,758,940 1 $1,371,890 1 $1,365,4801 $1,383,750
Balance
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 21
Long -term Improvements
a. Completion of the 53rd Avenue trail link between the Shingle Creek/North Hennepin Trail
Loop trail and Bryant Avenue.
b. Consideration of the Twin Lake Trail system and Shingle Creek trail head improvements.
III. PARKS, PUBLIC FACILITIES, AND CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
Improvements to parks and other public facilities such as the Civic Center, central garage, and fire
stations, are made primarily through the Capital Improvements Fund. Certain types of large -scale
equipment such as telephone systems are also purchased through the Capital Improvements Fund. The
Capital Improvements Fund is funded from a variety of sources, with the largest being the General
Fund and proceeds from General Obligation bond sales. In 1997, the Capital Improvements Fund was
split into two funds: the $1 million Capital Reserve Emergency Fund, and the Capital Improvements
Fund. The Capital Improvements Fund is intended for park, building, and other miscellaneous
improvements, while the Capital Reserve Emergency Fund is a restricted fund intended to provide
emergency financing for nonreimbursable emergency expenses or emergency cash flow. There is no
established minimum balance for the Capital Improvements Fund. Since all the improvements under -
the following three sections are financed primarily through the Capital Improvements Fund, the table
projecting its balance in 5 years follows the final section.
a. Parks
The Brooklyn Center park system is in the process of being systematically renovated. A thorough
review of park facilities has been completed and reviewed with the community through a series of
informational meetings hosted by the Park and Recreation Commission, and a plan for improvements is
under way. This plan anticipates the continued use of the operating budget to make improvements such
as minor equipment (picnic tables, benches, trash receptacles, etc.) replacement; trail repair and
sealcoating; minor shelter building and electrical repairs; landscaping enhancements; minor tennis court
rehab; etc. Major improvements such as playground replacement; shelter replacement; replacement of
field and trail lights; parking lot improvements; etc. would be financed through the Capital
Improvements Fund.
This plan uses the following principles to establish priorities for improvements:
1. Complete the replacement of playground equipment by 1999.
2. If possible, improve neighborhood parks coincident with neighborhood street and utility
improvements.
3. Provide geographic balance in improving parks, so that over a short period of time all
neighborhoods have access to at least one fully improved park.
4. Complete improvements at one Community Park per year.
5. If possible, when improving a park complete all improvements comprehensively. For
example, complete all playground, shelter, and other large improvements as well as
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 22
smaller improvements such as replacing picnic tables, trash receptacles, bleachers, and
drinking fountains, etc., repairing basketball courts, adding landscaping, sealcoating
trails, and replacing signs.
6. Improvements should be made systematically and annually from the Capital
Improvements Fund and General Fund, rather than periodically by bond issue
proceeds. Annual expenditures from the Capital Improvements Fund should generally
not exceed $225,000.
These prioritization principles result in a program of seven to eight years of capital improvements.
This plan does not comprehend adding major new facilities, such as additional lighted ball fields.
Addition of new facilities would increase the length of the program. After about year ten, playgrounds,
tennis courts, etc. which had been improved in the past several years would start to require
rehabilitation or replacement, and the cycle would begin again.
This plan uses the following principles to establish the types of improvements:
1. Five parks have been designated Community Parks. These "destination parks" will
have larger playgrounds; larger, heated shelter buildings; lighted rinks and ballfields;
lighted ball fields; and other specialized facilities such as tennis courts, or football or
soccer fields. These parks are: Central /Garden City, Grandview, Evergreen, West
Palmer, and Kylawn.
2. Neighborhood parks will generally include playgrounds, basketball courts, ball
diamonds, and picnic shelters and picnic areas. Some parks with traditionally strong
hockey and pleasure skating programs will include lighted rinks and smaller warming
houses. Parks which would continue to have warming houses would be: Orchard Lane
and Northport. As specialized facilities in neighborhood parks are to be considered for
major capital improvements, the neighborhood, the Park and Recreation Commission,
and the Council would review the appropriateness of the facility for the neighborhood
and the park before making that investment.
5 Year Improvements
1. Complete the replacement of playground equipment.
2. Continue the systematic improvement of park facilities, with major improvements in the next 5
years to Central, Firehouse, Happy Hollow, East and West Palmer, Kylawn, Twin Lake,
Willow Lane, and Grandview.
3. Revise recreation programming as improvements are made.
Lone Term Improvements
1. Continue the systematic improvement of park facilities:
2. Periodically obtain community input regarding new facilities or recreational needs, and adjust
the long -term plan accordingly.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 23
Table 14
PARK FACILITIES FUTURE MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT NEEDS
p4,ltlt:;.:::.::: >:;:
Bellvue Monitor, minor improvements through General Fund Monitor, replace as necessary
Brooklane Monitor, minor improvements through General Fund Review shelter condition
Cahlander 2004: install trail lights Monitor native plantings
Centerbrook GC See section below Monitor, replace as necessary
Central 2000: upgrade landscaping, replace lights, add trail signs Monitor, replace as necessary
Evergreen Monitor, minor improvements through General Fund Monitor, replace as necessary
Firehouse 2000: replace shelter, lighting Monitor, replace as necessary
Freeway 2000: replace lighting add soccer field, relocate ballfield Review shelter, playground condition
2005: replace picnic shelter
Garden City 2000: add pond, relocate rinks Monitor, replace as necessary
2002: replace lighting
2005: replace shelter
Grandview 2003: replace ballfield/hockey lights Monitor, replace as necessary
2004: replace shelter, repair tennis courts, move & pave hockey rink
Hagel Arboretum 2000: landscaping improvements
2005: pond & landscaping improvements
Happy Hollow 2000: replace shelter, lights Monitor, replace as necessary
Kylawn 2002: replace shelter, lights, pave hockey rink Monitor, replace as necessary
2004: repair tennis courts
Lakeside No improvements
Lions Monitor, minor improvements through General Fund Monitor, replace as necessary
Marlin Monitor, minor improvements through General Fund Monitor, replace as necessary
North Mississippi Hennepin Parks improvements
Northport 2000: add soccer field, relocate ballfield
2005: replace shelter, lights
Orchard Lane 2001: replace shelter, lights Monitor, replace as necessary
Palmer Lake East 2000: replace shelter, lights, relocate and raise trail Monitor, replace as necessary
Palmer Lake West 2000: repair tennis court Monitor, replace as necessary
2001: replace shelter, lights, add storage bldg„ pave rink
Palmer Lake 2001: trail signage, add covered tables Monitor, replace as necessary
Riverdale 2005: replace shelter, lights Monitor, replace as necessary
Twin Lake 2002: remove shelter & ballfield, replace playground, lights, add Park & Rec Commission recommendations
small parking lot, add fishing pier for improvement
Wangstad Monitor, minor improvements through General Fund Monitor, replace as necessary
Willow Lane 2003: replace shelter, lights Monitor, replace as necessary
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 24
b. Centerbrook Golf Course
Centerbrook Golf Course is a nine hole, par three course operated as an enterprise fund. It was built in
1986 -87 with a $1,100,000 loan and $600,000 grant from the Capital Improvements Fund. It opened
for business in Spring, 1988.
In 1997, a revised financial plan for the golf course restructured the fund's debt and created a capital
reserve. Annually, $20,000 is to be contributed toward the reserve to provide for replacement or
reconstruction of course facilities. Maintenance equipment is replaced through the Central Garage
Internal Service Fund, and is not funded from the capital reserve.
In Winter, 1997 -98, the golf course ponds were expanded considerably and other improvements made
as a part of the Shingle Creek Regional Pond project. These ponds now serve as part of series of storm
water detention ponds which treat storm water runoff from the Brookdale commercial area and
neighborhoods to the north and west, as well as TH 100 and Brooklyn Boulevard. The Storm Drainage
Utility budgets for maintenance of these onds, so the are not a responsibility of the golf course.
P Y P tY g
5 Year Im P rovement
1. Replace furnishings and appliances in the clubhouse as necessary.
2. Replace irrigation system controllers and some foot bridges and overlay the parking lot.
Table 15
GOLF COURSE FUND 5 YEAR PROJECTED BALANCE
9/2/99
/9
Operating Cash Starting Balance $18,518 $45,252 $70,945 $95,635 $119,151 $134,605
(Target starting operating balance) $53,470 $54,500 $55,570 $56,660 $57,490 $58,520
Ooeratine Revenues
Fees & rentals $305,618 $310,202 $314,855 $319,578 $324,372 $329,237
Concessions & merchandise 48,850 49,583 50,326 51,081 51,848 52,625
Interest 2,000 3,530 5,264 7,099 7,025 8,297
Operatine expenditures
Operating costs $ 238,184 $245,330 $252,689 $260,270 $268,078 $276,121
Cost of sales 34,750 35,793 36,866 37,972 39,111 40,285
Heto peratineincome $83.534 $82.193 $80.890 $79.516 $76.054 $73.755
Add back depreciation 13,200 13,500 13,800 14,000 14,400 14,400
Loan repayment (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (55,000) (55,000)
Contrib to capital (20,000) (20,000) (20,000) (20,000) (20,000) (20,000)
Operating Cash Ending Balance $45,252 $70,945 $95,635 $119,151 $134,605 $147,760
Capital Reserve Cash Starting Bal $18,340 $25,340 $34,340 $46,340 $21,340 $31,340
Contribution to capital 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
Capital Expenditure,I
Capital Outlays $13,000 $11,000 $8,000 $45,000 $10,000 $8,000
Clubhouse improvements 4,000 9,000 4,000 5,000
Grounds improvements 9,000 2,000 4,000 40,000 10,000 8,000
Capital Reserve Cash Ending Bal $25,340 $34,340 $46,340 $21,340 $31,340 $43,340
Total Golf Course Ending Balance $70,592 $105.285 $141,975 $140,491 $165,945 $191.1001
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 25
f
Long -term Improvements
1. Continue systematic upgrade of facilities as necessary.
C. Government Buildings
The City wns and operates several major facilities: City Hall and the Communit Center (together, the
tY P J tY Y � g
Civic Center); the Central Garage; and two fire stations. In addition, the City owns two of the three
municipal liquor store buildings. The City also owns and operates the Earle Brown Heritage Center, a
convention center and Inn complex developed from several buildings formerly housing the historic
Earle Brown estate and horse farm.
The Central Garage was recently remodeled and expanded and underground storage tanks removed and
replaced with a new fuel system. In 1998 -99 a new public safety facility was constructed at Humboldt
and 67th Avenues, and the west fire station/liquor store was demolished a new west fire station was
constructed. The east fire station was extensively remodeled. A referendum authorizing the sale of
$7.9 million.of General Obligation bonds to finance the public safety and fire station work was
approved in November, 1997.
Improvements to the City Hall and Community Center will be constructed in 2000. These
improvements would correct accessibility, mechanical, and space utilization deficiencies. The
improvements will consist of the construction of a new community services center with community
center space on the first floor and city offices on the second floor. A connector will provide access
between the new building and the community center, which will be remodeled. The existing city hall
will be demolished. Funding for the improvements will come from the Capital Improvement Fund
Most improvements to the Earle Brown Heritage Center are considered elsewhere and are not
comprehended in this study. However, in 1998 -99 several improvements were constructed through the
Capital Improvements Fund, to be reimbursed from the proceeds of a special $2,500,000 grant in state
funds. These improvements include purchase of land for and construction of an overflow parking lot;
construction of the G barn; and construction of walkways connecting the major convention buildings
and some additional storage space. Proposed major improvements to facilities to be considered over
the next several years include:
5 Year Improvements
1. Construct a new community services center to provide for improved public access and
customer service and improved Council Chambers, to meet ADA accessibility requirements, to
correct code violations, and to provide additional community space.
2. Remodel the Community Center with the emphasis on improved accessibility and to meet code
requirements.
3. Rehabilitate the north and south parking lots at the Civic Center.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 26
Long -term Improvements
1. Monitor community facility needs. Between 2005 -2010, begin community discussions
regarding city hall and community center long -term needs.
2. Consider an additional cold storage building at the Central Garage to accommodate additional
storage needs.
3. Reroof the Central Garage.
d. Miscellaneous Equipment
The City operates a Central Garage Internal Service Fund, which owns all vehicles and major
equipment. The cost of owning (depreciation, license, insurance, overhead) and operating (fuel,
preventative maintenance and repair) vehicles and equipment is charged back to the departments using
the equipment. Replacement of existing equipment is financed from the Fund. The addition of
equipment is funded from a variety of sources: the General Fund, enterprise funds, etc. The City's
policy for the replacement of vehicles and equipment establishes a projected reasonable life cycle for
each item. Life cycles are reviewed annually and updated on the basis of experience or changed
circumstances. New vehicles and equipment are proposed for addition to existing inventories and
replacement schedules when new needs are clearly demonstrated. Vehicle and equipment purchases
are generally considered during the annual budget, and are no longer incorporated into the CIP.
Routine equipment purchases, such as data processing equipment, are considered through the general
fund process and the MIS Strategic Plan, and are no longer incorporated into the CIP. However,
major equipment systems due to be considered for replacement which are beyond the scope of routine
are included here. For example, in 1998, the telephone systems which service the Civic Center,
Central Garage, Heritage Center, Fire Stations, and Liquor stores were replaced.
5 Year Improvements
1. Consider the replacement of the City's public safety and public works radio systems.
Long -term Improvements
1. Monitor data processing, telecommunications, and other equipment needs
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 27
• Table 16
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 5 YEAR PROJECTED BALANCE
8118199
•::.::;.;:: : 399�::::>:;:>:<:: �:>:>::»:::; �011#>::::;::> s:: �<:::>: : >:z::7.l�lE......:....�.......
Starting Balance (Net Current Assets) $8.743.342 $3 $342.859 $482.399 $627.019 $726.36
Reven
Investment interest $214,500 $161,640 $17,140 $24,120 $31,350 $36,320
Investment interest/bonds 105,000
Golf course loan payments 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 55,000
Liquor store loan payments 30,914 24,640
Other governments 2,500,000
Transfer from General/Liquor Fund 200,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000
Change in fair market value (70,000)
Other 10,000
Expenditures
Capital Outlays $8,550,977 $3, 426,200 $227,600 $229,500 $287,000 $739,500
East fire station 819,604
West fire station 2,310,523
Police station 3,666,263
Arbitrage rebate 86,251
City Hall/Comm Ctr impr 10,000 3,200,000
Park improvements 221,663 226,200 227,600 229,500 287,000 214,500
Central Garage impr 58,981 225,000
EBHC impr 1,377,205
Equipment/other 488 300,E
Ending Balance (as per financial report) $3,232,779 $342,859 $482,399 $627,019 $726,369 $378,189
Change in fair market value (70,000)
Ending Balance (net of change in $3,302,779 $412,859 $552,399 $697,019 $796,369 $448,189
fair market value)
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 2000 -2004 Page 28
APPENDIX
�
` .
' TABLE A - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Out
Water Utility Capital Im provements
1
�
EXPENDITURES: ok except for
obeotproi All water utility
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
8CADARep|anomen 359.762 (119.246)
Design #5.G exterior rehab �
!
VVe|houoa#6&8 exterior rehab
VVe||houne#7rehab 207
VVaUhouae#4oddn 40.000
WATER TOWERS
Repair Paint on Tower #1 300.000
Repair Paint on Tower #2 9.820
Replace Paint on Tower #3 431.554 31.512
Landscape Tower #1 8.705 2.552
MISCELLANEOUS |
�
Replace Fuel Tanks
Install adjustable speed drives 207.211 12.400
Portable 25DKVVgenerator 53.275
Relocate VV Fire main 76.304
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1.146.838 $352.318 $O $40.000 *D $O $O
FUND SOURCES:
Water Utility 867 352.218 U 40.000 O O O
NSP 279.587
TOTAL $1.146.838 | $352.218 $O $40.000 *O $O $O
TABLE B - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Sanitary Sewer Utility Capital Improvements
1 -Aug-
9 99
EXPENDITURES:
All San Sewer Utility
LIFT STATIONS
INTRAC Replacement 202,563
Previous years' projects
Replace Lifts 10 & 11 and Forcemain 400,000 150,000
SEWER REPLACEMENT:
Stabilize Miss River Interceptor 200,000.
MISCELLANEOUS
Replace Fuel Tanks
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0 $402,563 $400,000 $0 $0 $150,000 $0
FUND SOURCES:
Sanitary Sewer Utility 0 402,563 400,000 0 0 150,000 0
TOTAL $0 $402,563 $400,000 $0 $0 $150,000 $0
TABLE C - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Storm Drainage Utility Capital Improvements
.2.0
Storm drainage utility
EXPENDITURES: except where noted
SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
Miscellaneous structure improvmen 25,591 50,000:
Previous years' projects 1,893
WATER TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS
Shingle Creek Regional Pond 855,890 1,830,000 TIF, DTED grant, SDU, Mpis
TIF. 500,000
MPLS 266,250
DTED Grant 882,233 1,117,767
Storm Drainage Utility: to Mpls 415,983
Storm Drainage Utility (526,343) 30,000
Twin Lake Improvements 200,000
Palmer Lake Improvements 250,000 200,000
MISCELLANEOUS
Palmer Lake Drainage Study 2,227 22,000
Twin Lake Study 7,500
Surface Water Study 37,926 1/2 SDU, 1/2 Cap Impr Fund
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $923,527 $1,909,500 $250,000 $200,000 $0 $200,000 $0
FUND SOURCES:
Storm Drainage Utility (458,706) 525,483 250,000 200,000 0 200,000 0
Capital Improvements Fund 0
TIF 500,000
Other Governments 882,233 1,384,017
TOTAL $923,527 $1,909,500 $250,000 $200,000 $0 $200,000 $0
TABLE D - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Sidewalk and Trail improvements
19-Aug-99 aff
EXPENDITURES: Local State Aid
except where noted
OFF-STREET TRAIL:
Kylawn/Preserve 28,517 50% DNR match
Miscellaneous park trails 73 6 . 0,000 . 25,000
53rd Ave Greenway Trails 1,421 -100,000 50% DNR match
Palmer Lake Trails 100,000 25,000
ON-STREET TRAIL:
Marking and signage General Fund
SIDEWALK:
Miscellaneous repairs* 9,194 50,000 25,000 25,000
Repair retaining walls 59,485 25i000
Repair streetscape nodes 44,991
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $143,681 $235,000 $100,000 $50,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0
FUND SOURCES:
State Aid - Local 130,838 185,000 100,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 0
DNR 12,843 50,000 0 0 0 0
TOTAL $143,681 $235,000 $100,000 $50,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0
*In 1998, sidewalk repairs and retaining wall repairs were combined into one project.
TABLE E - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Park Improvements
19- Aug -99 1998 1' 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURES:
Bellvue
Shelter, playground, lights, misc 48,230 20,000 All Cap Impr Fund
Brooklane except as noted
Cahlander 10,000
Central
Shelter, ballfield, plaza pond 4,137 85,863
Lighting, landscaping 44,000
Centerbrook Golf Course
Clubhouse impr 3,000 4,000 9,000 4,000 5,000 Golf Course Fund
Grounds impr 9,000 2,000 4,000 40,000 10,000 8,000 Golf Course Fund
Other 8,000 Golf Course Fund
Evergreen
Shelter, lighting, misc 81,933
Firehouse
Picnic shelter, lighting, misc 41,800
Freeway
Lighting, etc 11,800
Garden City
Shelter, lights, misc 5,000 50,000
Grandview
Shelter, ball field lights, misc 3,800 200,000 149,500
Happy Hollow
Playground equipment 25,000
Shelter, misc 34,300
Kylawn /Arboretum
Shelter, tennis courts, misc 3,800 5,000 132,500 55,000
Lions
Shelter, lighting, misc 30,200
Marlin
� s
TABLE E - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Park Improvements
19- Aug -99 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUND SOURQE'
Northport
Lighting, etc 22,800
Orchard
Shelter, misc impr 81,800
E Palmer
Playground equipment 30,000 6,500
Shelter, misc impr 49,300
Palmer Lake Park
Picnic shelter, misc impr 18,500
W Palmer
Shelter, tennis courts, reconstr parking 3,800 40,000 127,300
lot, storage, misc impr
Riverdale
Picnic shelter, lighting, misc
Twin Lake
Playground, parking lot, lighting 47,000
Wangstad
Playground equipment 26,400
Willow Lane
Shelter, misc impr 18,500 87,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $205,300 $234,663 $237,200 $235,600 $274,500 $297,000 $222,500
FUND SOURCES:
Capital Impr Fund $194,300 $221,663 $226,200 $227,600 $229,500 $287,000 $214,500
Golf Course 11,000 13,000 11,000 8,000 45,000 10,000 8,000
TOTAL $205,300 $234,663 $237,200 $235,600 $274,500 $297,000 $222,500
TABLE E - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Park Improvements
30- Aug -99 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002, 2003 200„4 ,;'FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURES:
Befte
Shelter, playground, lights, misc 48,230 20,000 All Cap Impr Fund
Brooklane except as noted
Cahlander 10,000
Central
Shelter, ballfield, plaza pond 4,137 85,863
Lighting, landscaping 41,500
Centerbrook Golf Course
Clubhouse impr 3,000 4,000 9,000 4,000 5,000 Golf Course Fund
Grounds impr 9,000 2,000 4,000 40,000 10,000 8,000 Golf Course Fund
Other 8,000 Golf Course Fund
Evergreen
Shelter, lighting, misc 81,933
Firehouse
Picnic shelter, lighting, misc 41,800
Freeway
Lighting, etc 21,800
Garden City
Shelter, lights, misc 5,000 10,000 50,000
Grandview
Shelter, ball field lights, misc 3,800 200,000 149,500
Happy Hollow
Playground equipment 25,000
Shelter, misc 29,300
Kylawn /Arboretum
Shelter, tennis courts, misc 3,800 5,000 132,500 55,000
Lions
Shelter, lighting, misc 30,200
Marlin
1 It t
TABLE E - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Park Improvements
30- Aug -99 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUND 'SOURCE
Northport
Lighting, etc 22,800
Orchard
Shelter, misc impr 81,800
E Palmer
Playground equipment 30,000 6,500
Shelter, misc impr 41,800
Palmer Lake Park
Picnic shelter, misc impr 18,500
W Palmer
Shelter, tennis courts, reconstr parking 3,800 35,000 127,300
lot, storage, misc impr
Riverdale
Picnic shelter, lighting, misc
Twin Lake
Playground, parking lot, lighting 47,000
Wangstad
Playground equipment 26,400
Willow Lane
Shelter, misc impr 18,500 87,000
30,684
8,112
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $38,796 $205,300 $234,663 $237,200 $235,600 $274,500 $297,000 $222,500
FUND SOURCES:
Capital Impr Fund $38,796 $194,300 $221,663 $226,200 $227,600 $229,500 $287,000 $214,500
Golf Course 0 11,000 13,000 11,000 8,000 45,000 10,000 8,000
TOTAL $38,796 $205,300 $234,663 $237,200 $235,600 $274,500 $297,000 $222,500
TABLE F - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Public Building Improvements
19- Aug -99 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 :FUNDS,
PURCE
Capital Impr Fund
EXPENDITURES: except where noted
CIVIC CENTER
Construct new police station 1,042,718 3,666,263 GO Bonds /CIF
Purchase land 356,040
Rehabilitate City Hall /Comm Center 10,000 3,000,000
Replace phone systems 207,416 488
Replace radio system 300,000
Pool ozonozation 32,666
Rehab parking lots 200,000
CENTRAL GARAGE
Replace fuel tanks Cap Impr Fund, Utilities
Garage addition 11,547 84,258 Cap Impr Fund, Utilities
Additional cold storage 450,000
Reroof
FIRE STATIONS
Remodel East Station 218,849 819,604 GO Bonds /CIF
New West Station 463,044 2,310,523 GO Bonds /CIF
Purchase land 9,131 GO Bonds /CIF
Fridley training facility
Building project contingency
EBHC
Building & parking lot impr 1,122,795 1,377,205 State grant funds
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,464,206 $8,268,341 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $750,000
FUND SOURCES:
Capital Improvements Fund 1,739,595 (1,053,326) 3,200,000 0 (7) 0 525,000
Water Utility 12,639 112,500
Sanitary Sewer Utility 12,639 112,500
GO Bonds 1,724,611 6,796,390 0 0 7 0
Other governments 0 2,500,000 0 0 0
TOTAL $3,464,206 $8,268,341 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $750,000
j s
TABLE G - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements
02- Sep -99 1998 1999 2000 2Q01 2002 2003 2004 FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURES:
SIGNALS
Replace lamps with LCDs 13,034 5,855 Local State Aid
Pole painting & restoration 25,000 Local Stats Aid
Xerxes /55th & 56th 250,000 Special Assessments
STATE AID STREETS
Previous years' projects 103,389 MSA- Regular
France Avenue. 69 th to N Citv.LiM 211,753 0
MSA- Regular 31,414 161,987 MSA - Regular
MSA -Local 109,381 (122,977) Local State Aid
Water Utility 24,121 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 6,059 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility 40,778 (39,010) Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments Special Assessments
69th Avenue Roadway & Landscapi 45,550 3,864
MSA - Regular 245,221 MSA - Regular
MSA -Local 37,773 (213,966) Local State Aid
Water Utility 7,777 (8,184) Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility (22,685) Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility 3,478 Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments Special Assessments
John Martin Drive, 176,722 (63)
MSA - Regular 125,349 47,328 MSA - Regular
MSA -Local (79,431) (47,391) Local State Aid
Water Utility 0 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 999 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility 643 Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments 129,162 Special Assessments
TABLE G - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements
02- Sep -99 ` 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002' '2003 2004 FUND SOURCE'
Earle Brown Drive AS BID 306,179
MSA- Regular 107,448 12,206 MSA - Regular
MSA -Local (33,398) (12,206) Local State Aid
Water Utility 924 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 2,668 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility 4,621 Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments 223,916 Special Assessments
Brookly Boulevard. 64th to N City. 5,606 1,075,000 1,732,680 229,260
ROW: TIF 800,000 TIF
ROW: Local State Aid 200,000 Local State Aid
Roadway: MSA 99,000 MSA - Regular
Roadway: LSA 182,100 Local State Aid
Water Utility 203,500 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utilty 7,200 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility 400 Storm Drainage Utility
Enhancements: ISTEA 862,700 183,400 ISTEA
Enhancements: LSA 5,606 75,000 377,780 45,860 Local State Aid
Lighting, Landscaping 0 NSP
73rd. Humb oldt to TH 252 352,000
MSA - Regular 232,320 MSA - Regular
MSA -Local (51,960) Local State Aid
Water Utility 56,320 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 56,320 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments 59,000 Special Assessments
Shingle Cr Pkwv. CR 10 t 1 -694 x
MSA - Regular MSA - Regular
MSA -Local Local State Aid
Water Utility Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments Special Assessments
TABLE G - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements
02- Sep-99 1998 1999 2000 2001, .2002 2003 2004 FUND SOURCE
Summit. SC to TH 100 x
MSA- Regular MSA - Regular
MSA -Local Local State Aid
Water Utility Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments Special Assessments
53rd. France Avenue to 5!2h
MSA - Regular MSA - Regular
MSA -Local Local State Aid
Water Utility Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments Special Assessments
Dupont. 65th to 73rd
MSA - Regular MSA - Regular
MSA -Local Local State Aid
Water Utility Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments Special Assessments
Xerxes. 5 5th. 56th
MSA - Regular MSA - Regular
MSA -Local Local State Aid
Water Utility Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments Special Assessments
COMMERCIAL STREETS
James /67th 155,789 70 % Special assmnts,
MSA -Local 775 Local State Aid
Water Utility 0 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 609 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility 3,437 Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments 150,968 Special Assessments
TABLE G - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements
02- Sep -99 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUND, SOURCE
Lee /68th 166,328 30% LSA
MSA -Local (53,569) Local State Aid
Water Utility 16,174 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 1,974 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility 4,891 Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments 196,858 Special Assessments
66th /Camden 621,891
MSA -Local 73,256 Local State Aid
Water Utility - Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments 548,635 Special Assessments
47th /48th /Dusharme x
MSA -Local Local State Aid
Water Utility Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments Special Assessments
`NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS
James /Knox/57th
Sp Assess Constr Fund 6,811 39,794 Sp Assess Constr Fund
MSA - Regular 393,751 MSA - Regular
MSA -Local (434,976) MSA -Local
Water Utility (1,431) Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility Storm Drainage Utility
Street Assessments Street Assessments
Storm Drainage Assessments Storm Dr Assessments
Orchard West
Sp Assess Constr Fund 29,738 106,263 Sp Assess Constr Fund
MSA - Regular MSA - Regular
MSA -Local 500 MSA -Local
Water Utility 6,426 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 5,075 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility 33,671 Storm Drainage Utility
Street Assessments Street Assessments
Storm Drainage Assessments Storm Dr Assessments
TABLE G - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements
02- Sep -99 1998 1999 2000 2001. 2002 2003 2004 FUND SOURCE
Qellvue Neighborhood (as of 11/3 li
Sp Assess Constr Fund 413,075 Sp Assess Constr Fund
MSA- Regular 151,500 22,345 MSA - Regular
MSA -Local 74,080 (22,345) MSA -Local
Water Utility 134,419 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 313,076 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utilty 739,691 Storm Drainage Utility
Street Assessments 426,732 Street Assessments
Storm Drainage Assessments 141,518 Storm Dr Assessments
St. AI's Neighb orhood as of 11 /a
Sp Assess Constr Fund 136,804 Sp Assess Constr Fund
MSA - Regular MSA - Regular
MSA -Local MSA -Local
Water Utility 22,691 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 101,381 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utilty (32,216) Storm Drainage Utility
Street Assessments 186,390 Street Assessments
Storm Drainage Assessments 64,614 Storm Dr Assessments
SE Neighborh as of 6/�
Sp Assess Constr Fund 40,663 556,222 Sp Assess Constr Fund
MSA - Regular 105,776 30,693 MSA - Regular
MSA -Local 30,693 (30,693) MSA -Local
Water Utility 94 66,511 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 6,476 520,835 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utilty 32,614 Storm Drainage Utility
Street Assessments 803,920 Street Assessments
Storm Drainage Assessments 265,103 Storm Dr Assessments
Garden P ity Central
Sp Assess Constr Fund 351,230 Sp Assess Constr Fund
MSA - Regular 289,080 MSA - Regular
MSA -Local 75,000 MSA -Local
Water Utility 630,520 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 474,180 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utilty 670,160 Storm Drainage Utility
Street Assessments 831,195 Street Assessments
Storm Drainage Assessments 272,210 Storm Dr Assessments
TABLE G - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements
02- Sep -99 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002, 2003 2004 FUND SOURCE
H a I i fax /Grimes /F ra n ce
Sp Assess Constr Fund 135,535 Sp Assess Constr Fund
MSA- Regular MSA - Regular
MSA -Local MSA -Local
Water Utility 69,565 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 58,580 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utilty 76,885 Storm Drainage Utility
Street Assessments 25,560 Street Assessments
Storm Drainage Assessments 0 Storm Dr Assessments
Garden City North
Sp Assess Constr Fund 549,395 Sp Assess Constr Fund
MSA - Regular 0 MSA - Regular
MSA -Local 50,000 MSA -Local
Water Utility 566,625 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 477,160 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utilty 372,645 Storm Drainage Utility
Street Assessments 712,790 Street Assessments
Storm Drainage Assessments 253,625 Storm Dr Assessments
Garden Citv South
Sp Assess Constr Fund 501,392 Sp Assess Constr Fund
MSA - Regular 469,800 MSA - Regular
MSA -Local 100,000 MSA -Local
Water Utility 442,325 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 442,325 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utilty 328,944 Storm Drainage Utility
Street Assessments 634,825 Street Assessments
Storm Drainage Assessments 216,170 Storm Dr Assessments
Northport West
Sp Assess Constr Fund 164,310 Sp Assess Constr Fund
MSA - Regular 273,660 MSA - Regular
MSA -Local MSA -Local
Water Utility 239,500 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 239,500 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utilty 134,320 Storm Drainage Utility
Street Assessments 352,640 Street Assessments
Storm Drainage Assessments 93,000 Storm Dr Assessments
TABLE G - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements
02- Sep-99 1998 1,999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004' FUND SOURCE
Middle Twin Lake
Sp Assess Constr Fund 140,640 Sp Assess Constr Fund
MSA- Regular MSA - Regular
MSA -Local MSA -Local
Water Utility 104,040 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 104,040 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utilty 85,140 Storm Drainage Utility
Street Assessments 153,120 Street Assessments
Storm Drainage Assessments 49,500 Storm Dr Assessments
' Tanoletown
Sp Assess Constr Fund 856,045 Sp Assess Constr Fund
MSA -Local 50,000 MSA -Local
Water Utility 595,180 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 595,180 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utilty 525,280 Storm Drainage Utility
Street Assessments 842,300 Street Assessments
Storm Drainage Assessments 255,895 Storm Dr Assessments
Palmer East
Sp Assess Constr Fund 834,602 Sp Assess Constr Fund
MSA - Regular MSA - Regular
MSA -Local 50,000 MSA -Local
Water Utility 665,670 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 665,670 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utilty 560,350 Storm Drainage Utility
Street Assessments 1,096,258 Street Assessments
Storm Drainage Assessments 312,050 Storm Dr Assessments
Northport South
Sp Assess Constr Fund Sp Assess Constr Fund
MSA - Regular MSA - Regular
MSA -Local MSA -Local
Water Utility Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utilty Storm Drainage Utility
Street Assessments Street Assessments
Storm Drainage Assessments Storm Dr Assessments
ir a .
TABLE G - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements
02- Sep -99 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUND;SOURCE
ENHANCEMENTS
Paint 69th Avenue parkway fence 14,000 Local State Aid
Xerxes Avenue Streetscape 100,000 Local State Aid
BCIP Streetscape 250,000 Local State Aid
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,881,380 $4,539,663 $5,925,393 $3,577,625 $5,369,191 $3,719,880 $4,434,600
FUND SOURCES:
MSA - Regular 411,652 690,105 1,057,050 0 743,460 0 0
MSA - Local 108,149 (16,273) 105,045 95,860 200,000 50,000 300,000
Water Utility 211,702 59,251 888,909 636,190 785,865 595,180 665,670
Sanitary Sewer Utility 435,649 500,818 537,700 535,740 785,865 595,180 665,670
Storm Drainage Utility 790,895 1,703 670,560 449,530 548,404 525,280 560,350
Special Assessments: Streets 1,090,110 1,576,471 1,140,195 738,350 1,140,585 842,300 1,096,258
Special Assessments: Storm Dr 206,132 265,103 272,210 253,625 358,670 255,895 312,050
Special Assessment Constr Fund 627,001 662,485 391,024 684,930 806,342 856,045 834,602
TIF 0 800,000 0 0 0 0 0
Other Governments 0 0 862,700 183,400 0 0 0
TOTAL $3,881,380 $4,539,663 $5,925,393 $3,577,625 $5,369,191 $3,719,880 $4,434,600