HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978 07-05 July 5, 1978
Planning Commission
City of Brooklyn Center
From: Northwest Neighborhood Advisory Group
Subject: Request for rezoning from R -3 (Townhouse- Garden Apartments) to
C -2 (General Commerce) per Planning Commission Application No.
78032 as submitted by Mr. R. L. Johnson, owner of the subject
property in the 7200 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard (west side).
The undersigned, as Secretary for the Northwest Advisory Group, was instructed
to convey the following action taken by the Group on the above subject referred
by the Planning Commission Secretary in his letter dated June 19, 1978.
Members of the Group held a meeting at 7 :00 P. M. on June 29, 1978 in the
Library Conference Room of the Civic Center to consider the above subject.
Present were: James Carlson, George Uhlenkott, Louis Terzich, and Commissioner
Richard Theis.
The applicant, Mr. Robert L. Johnson, was present to explain the request.
The following residents from Creek Villa Townhouse Group were present to
represent those residents: (Creek Villa borders the subject site on its
southern boundary)
Sam & Bernyce Jeffries 7214 E. Perry Court
Clyde & Betty Liveringhouse 7222 E. Perry Court
Ken & Pat Wutscrke 7226 E. Perry Court
James Carlson acted as Chairman of the meeting.
The Applicant, Mr. R': L. Johnson, made the following statements:
1. He has not been able to find a builder /developer who would develop
the subject site for Townhouses. A "For Sale" sign has been on the
property for several years.
2. Because of increased costs in labor and materials, it has become too
costly to build anything other than commercial ventures on this site.
3. Location is unique in that the usuable part of the site is separated
from the remainder of Brooklyn Center by Shingle Creek on southern
boundary and by commercial properties in Brooklyn Park on its northern
boundary.
4. Brooklyn Center does not service this site with sewer and water. These
services must be obtained from Brooklyn Park, which has these services
close by.
5. Part of the subject property lies south of Shingle Creek but is not
useable for building and will remain in its natural state.
Page 2
6. An easement of 50 feet on both sides of the center line of Shingle
Creek will not be disturbed and will remain as is. This easement
area is heavily laden with trees. Car parking will also stay off
this easement area.
7. The area along the creek is heavily wooded and provides an excellent
barrier for townhouse residents against any developments on the
north side of the creek.
8. Only 2.8 acres of the total of 4.8 acres in the site is buildable
because of poor soil conditions in some areas, the 100 foot easement,
and non - accessible portion of land south of the creek. This amounts
to about 40% of the site dedicated to green area.
9. Heavy traffic on Brooklyn Boulevard will continue to increase with
time. Brooklyn Park is only partially developed now, and it is
estimated that its population will reach 90,000 or more in the future.
Substantial numbers of these residents will use Brooklyn Blvd. and
increase the traffic load to far greater volumes than at present.
10. The Applicant is being forced by Brooklyn Center to incur a $10,000
expense to help provide sewer and water services across his property
for the benefit of another office building across Brooklyn Blvd. from
the subject site.
11. It is proposed to developed the site in the following manner:
a. It is proposed to build a low profile rambler style 2 -story
office building.with an effort to make it blend with the
surroundings. The building (one larger, or possibly two
smaller sized) would be situated in the area adjacent to the
creek as shown on drawings and depicted on a model of the
site. The Applicant has some committments from attorneys,
dentist and others for office space. The Applicant is owner
of Big B's Pizza with several outlets in the Twin Cities area.
He would move the corporate offices into the proposed office bldg.
b. It is proposed to build a Sambos Restaurant on the northerly
portion of the site adjacent to the Brooklyn Park commercial
property. A purchase agreement for the restaurant exists pending
the rezoning of the property. To accommodate this development,
the Applicant has had to commit to purchase the existing 12
story frame dwelling presently surrounded by the Applicant`s
present ownership, which has increased the investment in the
property.
12. The Applicant presented a model of the subject site as it is proposed
to be developed and explained the proposal and answered questions.
It was brought out during the discussions that a C -1 zoning would be
adequate for the proposed office building, and that a C -2 zoning would
be required for the proposed Sambos Restaurant.
• The Acting Chairman called for comments from the Creek Villa residents. The
residents were unanimous in the following comments:
Page 3
1. It would be preferred to have the proposed office building on the
site rather than more townhouses (Wutschke).
2. There would be no opposition (Liveringhouse) from Creek Villa residents
with a split zoning of the subject site and placement of the office
building and the restaurant as depicted on the scale model.
3. For better control of traffic for each of the two proposed buildings,
it would be urgently requested (Jeffries) to have no connection between
the parking lots as shown on the model. The Applicant stated he would
have no objection to placing a 5 or 6 foot berm on the dividing line
of the two sites including closing the driveway as shown connecting the
two lots -- this would tend to cut down some on the noise factor and
prevent "racing" in the parking lots, especially in late hours.
4. Would want (Liveringhouse) the 100 foot easement area and the triangular
area south of the creek left in its present natural state, and that the
parking lot for the office building to be kept off the easement area.
The Acting Chairman then closed the public meeting and called for - statements
from the Group;
Terzich stated he had an interest in the transaction for the restaurant
site and would not vote, but offered the following observations: In general
he agreed with the comments made by the Applicant and also endorsed those
statements made by the Creek Villa residents. He emphasized his opinion
that Brooklyn Blvd. is heavily traveled with about 24 cars per day
(1976 data) going past the site now and increasing in the future; the site
is unique in many respects, and that the proposed office building and Sambos
`restaurant are in keeping with the general commercial nature of Brooklyn
Blvd. He was in favor of the split zoning as depicted on the scale model.
Uhlenkott inquired on the status of the comprehensive plan and also clari-
fication of the need for future housing as propounded by the Metropolitan
Council. It was estimated! that 36 to 40 townhouses could occupy a site of
the size of the subject site. After some discussion, he stated he agreed
with the Creek Villa residents that split zoning to provide the office building
and restaurant as shown on the scale model would be a desirable development
and would vote in favor of split zoning of the site.
Carlson observed that he had a hand in developing the present Comprehensive
Plan in the 1960's, and that in normal cases the Planning Commission would
follow the Plan. However, after a period of time developments change and
the Comprehensive Plan has to be changed on occasions. This is especially
true of property along Brooklyn Blvd. Accordingly, Carlson voted in favor
6f split zoning as shown on the model plan, subject to compliance of the
proposal to statements made by Creek Villa residents and requirements of
the zoning ordinances pertaining to the respective classifications.
Uhlenkott and Carlson voted in favor of the split zoning as desribed above.
Commissioner Theis stated he would look into the need for providing future
housing needs and the problem involved in split zoning as favored by the
Group and the Creek Villa residents.
Northwest- -�eighb ,a d_ Advisoory Group
By: 6�L
Louis Terzich, 8 cy.