HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998 12-14 CCP Regular Session CITY COUNCIL MEETING
® City of Brooklyn Center
December 14, 1998 AGENDA
1. Informal Open Forum With City Council - 6:45 p.m.
- provides an opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the
agenda. Open Forum will be limited to 15 minutes, it is not televised, and it may not be
used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political endorsements,
or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with
citizens. Questions from the Council will be for clarification only. Open Forum will not
be used as a time for problem solving or reacting to the comments made but, rather, for
hearing the citizen for informational purposes only.
2. Invocation - 7 p.m.
3. Call to Order Regular Business Meeting
4. Roll Call
5. Council Report
• 6. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda
-The following items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted
by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember
so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and
considered at the end of Council Consideration Items.
a. Approval of Minutes
- Councilmembers not present at meetings will be recorded as abstaining from the vote
on the minutes.
1. Regular Session - November 23, 1998
2. Work Session - November 30, 1998
b. Licenses
- Consideration of 1999 Liquor Licenses
- Consideration of 1999 Pawn Shop License
C. Site Performance Guarantee Releases
- Minnesota State High School League (2100 Freeway Boulevard)
-Cross of Glory Lutheran Church (5929 Brooklyn Boulevard)
- Sunlite III, LLP (6601 Shingle Creek Parkway)
® d. Resolution Declaring that the City Does not Waive the Statutory Limit on Municipal
Tort Liability for the Purpose of Renewing Insurance Policies for the 1999 Year
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- December 14,1998
e. Resolution Accepting Work Performed and Authorizing Final Payment, Improvement
Project No. 1998 -12, Contract 1998 -0, Landscape Nodes Upgrade
f. Resolution Approving Change Order No. 1, and Supplemental Agreement No. 1,
Accepting Work Performed and Authorizing Final Payment, Improvement Project No.
1998 -26, Contract 1998 -G, Relocation of 16" Water Main and Appurtenances at West
Fire Station
g. An Ordinance Vacating a Drainage and Utility Easement - REGAL ROAD
DEVELOPMENT SECOND ADDITION
- Motion to approve first reading of ordinance and set January 11, 1999, for public
hearing and second reading.
h. An Ordinance Vacating Easements for Street Purposes - BROOKLYN CENTER
POLICE STATION WEST
- Motion to approve first reading of ordinance and set January 11, 1999, for public
• hearing and second reading.
i. Resolution Approving Change Order No. 1, Change Order No. 2, Accepting Work
Performed and Authorizing Final Payment, Miscellaneous Sidewalk Removal,
Replacement and Installation, Improvement Project No. 1997 -16, Contract 1997 -K
j. Approval of Minnesota Auto Theft Prevention Grant Application
7. Public Hearings
a. 1999 -2003 Capital Improvement Program
1. Resolution Approving 1999 -2003 Capital Improvement Program
-Requested Council Action-
-Open the public hearing.
-Take public input.
-Close the public hearing.
- Motion to adopt resolution.
b. Consideration of 1999 Budget
1. Approve Tax Levies
a. Resolution Approving a Final Tax Capacity Levy for the Purpose of
Defraying the Cost of Operation, Providing Informational Service, and
Relocation Assistance Pursuant to the Provisions of MSA 469.001 Through
469.047 of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of
Brooklyn Center for the Year 1999
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- December 14, 1998
b. Resolution to Authorize a Final Tax Levy for 1999 Appropriations for the
General Fund, the Debt Service Funds, the E.D.A. Fund, and the H.R.A.
Fund Budgets
- Requested Council Action:
-Open the public hearing.
-Take public input.
-Close the public hearing.
- Motion to adopt resolutions.
2. Adopt Proposed Fund Budgets
a. Resolution to Adopt the 1999 Proposed Budget for the General Fund
b. Resolution to Adopt the 1999 Proposed Budgets for the Special Revenue
Funds
c. Resolution to Adopt the 1999 Proposed Budgets for the Capital Projects
Fund
d. Resolution to Adopt the 1999 Proposed Budgets for the Enterprise Funds
e. Resolution to Adopt the 1999 Proposed Budgets for the Internal Service
Funds
- Requested Council Action:
-Open the public hearing.
-Take public input.
-Close the public hearing.
- Motion to adopt resolutions.
8. Planning Commission Item
a. Planning Commission Application No. 98027 Submitted by William Vetter and
Robert Peterson. Request for a Variance to allow a metes and bounds division of
property. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this application at its
December 3, 1998, meeting.
- Requested Council Action:
- Motion to approve Planning Commission Application No. 98027 subject to the
conditions recommended by the Planning Commission.
9. Council Consideration Items
a. Update on 69th Avenue Project
- Requested Council Action:
-City Manager will provide verbal update at meeting.
• b. Resolution Expressing Appreciation for the Gift of the Brooklyn Center Women's
Club in Support of the Annual Kid's Shopping Korner Activity
- Requested Council Action:
- Motion to adopt resolution.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 4- December 14, 1998
i
C. Proposed 1999 City Council Meeting Schedule
- Requested Council Action:
- Motion to adopt 1999 City Council meeting schedule.
d. Park and Recreation Commission Report on Community Meetings Regarding Park
Improvements
- Requested Council Action:
- Motion to receive report.
e. Proposal from Brooklyn Center High School Regarding Firehouse Park
- Requested Council Action:
- Motion to receive report.
f. Approval of Application for Exempt Permit from Evergreen Park Elementary PTO for
an Event to be Held January 22, 1999
- Requested Council Action:
- Motion to approve application.
An Ordinance Ordinance Amendin Sections 25 -501 25 -1003 25- 1006 25 -1010
g• g , and 25 -1015
of the Brooklyn Center Ordinances
1. Resolution Adopting Right -of -Way Permit Fee and Restoration Bond Rate
Schedule
- Requested Council Action:
- Motion to approve first reading of ordinance and set January 11, 1999, for
public hearing and second reading.
- Motion to adopt resolution.
h. Resolution Relating to Fees for Pawnbrokers and Secondhand Goods Dealers Licenses
and Investigations Thereof; Repealing Resolution No. 92 -15
- Requested Council Action:
- Motion to adopt resolution.
i. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 23 of the City Ordinances Relating to Payment by
Pawnbrokers and Secondhand Goods Dealers for Items Pledged and Location of
Pawnbrokers
- Requested Council Action:
- Motion to approve first reading of ordinance and set January 11, 1999, for
public hearing and second reading.
j. Resolution Amending the Schedule for Building Permit Fees
- Requested Council Action:
- Motion to adopt resolution.
i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -5- December 14, 1998
•
k. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 3 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Minnesota
State Building Code
- Requested Council Action:
- Motion to introduce first reading of ordinance and set public hearing and
second reading for January 11, 1999.
1. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 7 of the City Ordinances Relating to Storage of
Refuse Containers
- Requested Council Action:
- Motion to approve first reading of ordinance and set January 11, 1999, for
public hearing and second reading.
m. Resolutions Approving Bid Packages for Earle Brown Heritage Center Building
Additions and Renovations
1. Bid Division 3031 -EB: Building and Site Concrete
2. Bid Division 3061 -EB: Carpentry and Demolition
3. Bid Division 3071 -EB: EPDM and Metal Roofing
4. Bid Division 3081 -EB: Aluminum, Glass and Glazing
5. Bid Division 3082 -EB: Hollow Metal, Wood Door and Hardware - Supply
6. Bid Division 3091A -EB: Carpet and Resilient Flooring
7. Bid Division 3091B -EB: Hard Tile
8. Bid Division 3092 -EB: Acoustical Ceilings
9. Bid Division 3093 -EB: Painting
10. Bid Division 3101 -EB: Operable Folding Partitions
11. Bid Division 3151 -EB: Plumbing and HVAC
12. Bid Division 3152 -EB: Fire Protection
13. Bid Division 3161 -EB: Electrical
- Requested Council Action:
- Motion to adopt resolutions.
n. Mayoral Appointment to Housing Commission
- Requested Council Action:
- Motion to ratify Mayoral nomination.
o. Resolution Accepting Bids, and Awarding Contracts for Police Station Improvement
Project No. 1998 -09, Construction of New West Fire Station 1998 -10 and East Fire
Station Remodeling No. 1998 -11
- Requested Council Action:
- Motion to adopt resolution.
i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -6- December 14, 1998
p. Resolution Setting Salaries and Benefits for the Calendar Year 1999
-Requested Council Action:
- Motion to adopt resolution.
q. Report on Community Development Block Grant Home Rehabilitation Loan Options
- Requested Council Action:
- Council discussion of report.
10. Adjournment
City Council Agenda Item No. 6a
1
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
NOVEMBER 23, 1998
CITY HALL
1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in informal open forum at 6:50 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Myrna Kragness, Councilmembers Kathleen Carmody, Debra Hilstrom, Kay Lasman, and
Robert Peppe. Also present: City Manager Michael J. McCauley, Assistant City Manager/HR
Director Jane Chambers, Public Works Director Diane Spector, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and
Recording Secretary Maria Rosenbaum.
INFORMAL OPEN FORUM
® Dan Kealey from Disc Go Round addressed the Council regarding the recently adopted ordinance
on pawnshop /secondhand goods. Mr. Kealey expressed concern on the fees and asked the Council
to re -open for discussion. Mr. McCauley explained the City Attorney is working with the Police
Department on a proposal and this item will be on the December 14, 1998, agenda.
ADJOURN INFORMAL OPEN FORUM
A motion by Councilmember Lasman, seconded by Councilmember Hilstrom to adjourn the
informal open forum at 6:55 p.m. Motion passed unanimously.
2. INVOCATION
Ernee McArthur offered an invocation.
3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Myrna
Kragness at 7:04 p.m.
11/23/98 -1- DRAFT
•
4. ROLL CALL
Mayor Myrna Kragness, Councilmembers Kathleen Carmody, Debra Hilstrom, Kay Lasman, and
Robert Peppe. Also present: City Manager Michael J. McCauley, Assistant City Manager/HR
Director Jane Chambers, Planning and Zoning Specialist Ron Warren, Public Works Director Diane
Spector, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Recording Secretary Maria Rosenbaum.
5. COUNCIL REPORT
Councilmember Lasman reported that she attended the Crime Prevention meeting on November 18,
1998, and that there are now 149 neighborhood watch groups participating. She informed the
Council there will be a holiday shopping spree fundraiser on November 30, 1998, from 6:00 p.m.
to 8:00 p.m. at the Community Center, and a fundraising golf tournament on May 21, 1999.
Councilmember Carmody wished to thank Mayor Kragness for attending on her behalf the final Park
and Recreation Commission meeting.
6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA
A motion by Councilmember Hilstrom, seconded by Councilmember Carmody to approve the
agenda and consent agenda. Motion passed unanimously.
6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES •
A motion by Councilmember Hilstrom, seconded by Councilmember Carmody to approve the
minutes from the Special Work Session on November 16, 1998, and Regular Session on November
9, 1998. Motion passed unanimously.
6b. LICENSES
A motion by Councilmember Hilstrom and seconded by Councilmember Carmody to approve the
following list of licenses. Motion passed unanimously.
AMUSEMENT DEVICES - OPERATOR
Yun's Restaurant d/b /a Denny's 6405 James Circle North
CHRISTMAS TREE SALES LOT
PQT Company 5801 Xerxes Avenue North
PQT Company 5040 Brooklyn Boulevard
11/23/98
-2-
DRAFT
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
Commercial Plumbing and Heating, Inc. 3151 101 st Avenue NE, Blaine
Pierce Refrigeration 1920 2nd Avenue South, Anoka
RENTAL DWELLING
Renewal:
Terry Hartmann 6809 Fremont Place North
Jolui/Gail Lambert 5900 Washburn Avenue North
Lyle Miller 3501 47th Avenue North
Allan Olson 7112 Riverdale Road
Allan/Vicki Olson 7111 Riverdale Road
SING HANGER
Attracta Sign 7420 West Lake Street, St. Louis Park
6c. APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM LAWFUL GAMBLING
LICENSE FOR SOUTHERN ANOKA COUNTY CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE
A motion by Councilmember Hilstrom, seconded by Councilmember Carmody to approve the
application for exemption from lawful gambling license for Southern Anoka County Chamber of
Commerce. Motion passed unanimously.
6d. APPLICATION TO CONDUCT EXCLUDED BINGO AT ORCHARD LANE
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
A motion by Councilmember Hilstrom, seconded by Councilmember Carmody to approve the
application to conduct excluded bingo at Orchard Lane Elementary School. Motion passed
unanimously.
6e. RESOLUTION APPOINTING AUDITORS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,1998
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -198
Councilmember Hilstrom introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPOINTING AUDITORS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember
Carmody. Motion passed unanimously.
1 1/23/98 -3- DRAFT
7. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
7a. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 98021 SUBMITTED BY
WILLIAM R. STONER, STONER AND ASSOCIATES. REQUEST FOR
REZONING FROM C -2 (COMMERCE) TO C -1 (SERVICE /OFFICE) FOR
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5001 DREW AVENUE NORTH. THE
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS
APPLICATION AT ITS NOVEMBER 12, 1998, MEETING.
City Manager Michael McCauley discussed Planning Commission Application No. 98021 submitted
by William R. Stoner, Stoner and Associates requesting rezoning from C -2 (Commerce) to C -1
(Service /Office) for the property at 5001 Drew Avenue North. This matter was considered by the
Planning Commission at its November 12, 1998, meeting and was recommended for approval
through Planning Commission Resolution No. 98 -05. It is recommended that the City Council
approve a resolution approving the application offered in consideration of the following:
1. The proposed rezoning to the C -1 zoning designation is considered to be a public
benefit by limiting the uses of the property to a less intense commercial use which
is considered to be more compatible with surrounding property, particularly the R -1
zoned property to the north.
2. All permitted uses in the proposed C -1 zoning district can be contemplated for
development or redevelopment on the subject property.
3. The subject property will bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the
C -1 zoning district.
4. The property in question is considered to be more suitable for a C -1 rather than a C -2
zoning designation given the surrounding land uses. The C -1 rezoning will rule out
more intense and perhaps less desirable commercial uses which are otherwise
allowed in the C -2 district.
a
5. Limiting the commercial utilization of this property to a less intense, less intrusive
service /office zoning designation is considered to be in the best interests of the
community.
6. In light of the above, it is believed that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the
guidelines for evaluating rezonings contained in Section 35 -208 of the Zoning
Ordinance and is, therefore, in the best interests of the community.
11/23/98 -4- DRAFT
RESOLUTION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
APPLICATION NO. 98021 SUBMITTED BY WILLIAM R. STONER
•
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -199
Councilmember Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION
NO. 98021 SUBMITTED BY WILLIAM R. STONER
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember
Peppe. Motion passed unanimously.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING
THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LAND (5001 DREW AVENUE NORTH)
A motion by Councilmember Lasman, seconded by Councilmember Peppe to approve first reading
of an ordinance amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances regarding the zoning classification of
certain land (5001 Drew Avenue North), and set Public Hearing for December 14, 1998. Motion
passed unanimously.
7b. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 98023 SUBMITTED BY
ROMAN MUELLER, SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC. REQUEST FOR
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL TO TRANSFER PROPERTY FROM
THE NEWLY CREATED REGAL ROAD ADDITION TO THE
SUPERAMERICA SITE. THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION AT ITS
NOVEMBER 12, 1998, MEETING.
7e. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 98024 SUBMITTED BY
ROMAN MUELLER, SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC. REQUEST FOR
SITE AND BUILDING PLAN AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL TO
CONSTRUCT A 24'X 36' FREESTANDING CAR WASH ADDITION TO
THE EXISTING SUPERAMERICA SITE, 6545 WEST RIVER ROAD. THE
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS
APPLICATION AT ITS NOVEMBER 12,1998, MEETING.
11/23/98 -5- DRAFT
Mr. McCauley discussed item 7b, Planning Commission Application No. 98023 submitted by
Roman Mueller, Speedway SuperAmerica LLC requesting for preliminary plat approval to transfer
property from the newly created REGAL ROAD ADDITION to the SuperAmerica site, and item 7c
Planning Commission Application No. 98024 also submitted by Roman Mueller requesting for site
and building plan and special use permit approval to construct a 24' x 36' freestanding car wash
addition to the existing SuperAmerica site, 6545 West River Road. The Planning Commission
recommended approval of these applications at its November 12, 1998, meeting subject to the
following conditions:
Planning Commission Application No. 98023
1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.
2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances.
3. Appropriate drainage and utility easements shall be shown over the proposed Lot 1,
Block 1, to protect existing sanitary sewer in a manner acceptable to the City
Engineer.
4. Appropriate driveway and cross access easements indicating the relationship between
the proposed Lots 1 and 2 shall be filed with the final plat for this property.
Planning Commission Application No. 98024
1. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with
respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits.
2. Grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval by the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of permits.
3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be
determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits
to assure completion of all site improvements.
4. Any outside trash disposal facilities or on ground mechanical equipment shall be
appropriately screened from view.
5. An underground irrigation system shall be installed and maintained in all landscaped
areas to facilitate site maintenance.
6. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the city
ordinances.
1 1123/98 -6- DRAFT
7. B -612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas in
accordance with requirements of the City's zoning ordinance.
8. A special use permit is granted to Speedway SuperAmerica LLC for the construction
of a car wash in conjunction with its already existing gasoline service
station/convenience store. Any expansion or alteration of the use shall require an
amendment to the special use permit granted.
9. The special use permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances and regulations.
Any violation thereof shall be grounds for revocation.
10. The plans shall be modified prior to the issuance of building permits to show a 15 ft.
green strip along the 66th Avenue right -of -way in accordance with the requirements
of the zoning ordinance.
11. Appropriate one way directional signery shall be provided at the southeast and
southwest corners of the site to indicate one way traffic.
12. The final plat comprehended under Planning Commission Application No. 98023
shall be approved by the City Council and filed with Hennepin County prior to the
issuance of building permits.
13. The applicant shall provide appropriate erosion and sediment control devices on the
site during construction as approved by the City Engineering Department.
14. The property owner shall enter into an easement and agreement for maintenance and
inspection of utility and storm drainage systems prior to the issuance of permits.
15. The applicant shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and
utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee.
Council further discussed several issues regarding these Planning Commission applications. One
of the concerns with the freestanding car wash was the lighting and security. It was noted that there
will probably be additional lighting and that there will be cameras mounted in the store for viewing
of the carwash.
A motion by Councilmember Carmody, seconded by Councilmember Lasman to approve Planning
Commission Application Nos. 98023 and 98024 subject to the above listed conditions. Motion
passed unanimously.
• 11/23/98 -7- DRAFT
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT -- REGAL ROAD DEVELOPMENT SECOND
ADDITION
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -200
Councilmember Carmody introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT -- REGAL ROAD DEVELOPMENT SECOND
ADDITION
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember
Lasman. Motion passed unanimously.
7d. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 98025 (CUB FOODS)
SUBMITTED BY BROOKDALE CORNER LLC. REQUEST FOR
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL TO COMBINE THREE PARCELS OF
LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF XERXES AVENUE
AND COUNTY ROAD 10 INTO A SINGLE PARCEL. THE PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION AT
ITS NOVEMBER 12,1998, MEETING.
Mr. McCauley discussed Planning Commission Application No. 98025 submitted by Brookdale
Corner LLC requesting preliminary plat approval to combine three parcels of land located at the
southwest corner of Xerxes Avenue and County Road 10 into a single parcel.
Planning and Zoning Specialist Ron Warren discussed the applicant plans to demolish the two main
buildings on the sites and hopes to be under construction with the Cub Foods plan by early next
spring. It should be noted that a formal site and building plan application, or a PUD application, will
need to be presented to the Planning Commission and the City Council before constriction of the
planned buildings can go forward.
It appears to be in order and approval of the application is recommended subject to at least the
following conditions:
1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.
2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances.
3. The preliminary and final plats shall be modified to indicate the proper underlying
legal description of Tract A, RLS 1235 over the area that encompasses the
Westbrook Mall.
11/23/98 -8- DRAFT •
A motion by Councilmember Carmody, seconded by Councilmember Peppe to approve Planning
Commission Application No. 98025 subject to the above listed conditions. Motion passed
unanimously.
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT -- BROOKDALE CORNER ADDITION
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -201
Councilmember Carmody introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT -- BROOKDALE CORNER ADDITION
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember
Peppe. Motion passed unanimously.
7e. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 98026 SUBMITTED BY
CSM CORPORATION. REQUEST FOR SITE AND BUILDING PLAN
APPROVAL FOR A 6,000 SQ. FT. OFFICE BUILDING WITH A DRIVE UP
FACILITY ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON NORTHWAY DRIVE,
JUST NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD 10. THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION AT ITS
NOVEMBER 12,1998, MEETING.
Mr. Warren discussed Planning Commission Application No. 98026 submitted by CSM Corporation
requesting for site and building plan approval for a 6,000 sq. ft. office building with a drive up
facility on the property located on Northway Drive, just north of County Road 10. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of this application at its November 12, 1998, meeting.
Council discussed the landscaping and maintenance around the building and who will maintain the
area. It was noted that CSM will maintain the area.
All the plans seem to be in order and approval of this application is recommended subject to the
following conditions:
1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the building official with
respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits.
2. Grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval by the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of permits.
11/23/98 -9- DRAFT
3. A site performance agreement and financial guarantee in an amount to be determined
based on cost estimates shall be provided prior to the issuance of building permits for
this project. •
4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or on ground mechanical equipment
shall be appropriately screened from view.
5. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet
NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance
with Chapter 5 of the city ordinances.
6. Underground irrigation systems shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate
site maintenance.
7. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the city
ordinances.
8. B -612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas.
9. The applicant shall provide an as built survey of the property, improvements and
utility service lines rior to the release of the performance guarantee.
p g
p
10. The applicant shall provide appropriate erosion and sediment control devices on the
site during construction as approved by the City Engineering Department.
A motion by Councilmember Carmody, seconded by Councilmember Hilstrom to approve Planning
Commission Application No. 98026 subject to the above listed conditions. Motion passed
unanimously.
I I
8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS
8a. RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF S1,085,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1998A; FIXING THEIR
FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTING THEIR EXECUTION AND
DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT
RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF $1,585,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION STATE AID ROAD REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 199813;
FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTING THEIR
EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT
11/23/98 -10- DRAFT
Mr. McCauley discussed proposals were opened today at 10:30 a.m., at the office of Springsted
Incorporated for the awarding of the sale of improvement bonds to be supported by special
assessments on benefited property and awarding the sale of bonds which will provide for an advance
In
refunding of State Aid Road Bonds.
A representative from Springsted was present to discuss the proposals received and informed the
Council the lowest bidder for the $1,085,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Seri es 1998A
was Norwest Investment Services, Inc., and Piper Jaffray, Inc., for the $1,585,000 General
Obligation State -Aid Road Refunding Bonds, Series 1998B.
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -202
Councilmember Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF $1,085,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1998A; FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS;
DIRECTING THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR
PAYMENT
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember
Peppe. Motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -203
Councilmember Carmody introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF $1,585,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION STATE AID
ROAD REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 199813; FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS;
DIRECTING THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR
PAYMENT
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember
Lasman. Motion passed unanimously.
8b. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION AND APPRECIATION FOR
THE PUBLIC SERVICE OF ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN
BROOKLYN CENTER'S ADOPT -A -PARK, ADOPT -A- TRAIL, AND
ADOPT -A- STREET PROGRAMS
Mr. McCauley discussed this resolution is to express recognition and appreciation for the public
service of organizations participating in Brooklyn Center's Adopt -a -Park, Adopt -a- Trail, and Adopt -
a- Street Programs. Councilmember Lasman read the following names who are to be recognized:
11/23/98 -11- DRAFT
Allina Receivable Services Friends of Freeway Park
Barncale Bill's Steak & Seafood Friends of Riverdale Park
Boy Scout Troop #401 Garden City Elementary
Boy Scout Troop 4454 Girl Scout Troop #1469
Brookdale Chrysler Plymouth Girl Scout Troop #1789
Brooklyn Center Charter Commission Kids on the Move Daycare
Brooklyn Center Lions Club Looney Weavers
Brooklyn Center Lioness Club Minneapolis North Hilton Staff
Brooklyn Center Rotary Club Orchard Lane Elementary School
Brooklyn Swim Club Palmer Lake Elementary
Brooklyn United Methodist Church Park & Recreation Commission
Brookpark Dental Center Ray and Dolores Beach
Bullfrogs and Butterflies Childcare Region B Campfire Boys and Girls
Children's Residential Services Rise Creative Partnerships
Cub Scouts Pack 299 Riverwood Neighborhood Association
Cub Scouts Pack 401 Target - B.C. "Good Neighbors"
Cub Scouts Pack 454 Tim Olson
Earle Brown Elementary Todd Paulson Family
Evergreen Park School and PTO Willow Lane Student Council
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -204
Councilmember Hilstrom introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: •
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION AND APPRECIATION FOR THE PUBLIC
SERVICE OF ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN BROOKLYN CENTER'S ADOPT -A-
PARK, ADOPT -A- TRAIL, AND ADOPT -A- STREET PROGRAMS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember
Peppe. Motion passed unanimously.
8c. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES
IMPLEMENTING A TIME OF SALE HOUSING INSPECTION,
REQUIRING AN INSPECTION, DISCLOSURE OF CONSUMER
INFORMATION CONCERNING THE CONDITION OF A DWELLING
PRIOR TO ITS SALE, AND CORRECTION OF CERTAIN HAZARDOUS
CONDITIONS
Mr. McCauley discussed that the Council made a motion at its July 13, 1998, meeting to have this
ordinance referred back to the Housing Commission to review the ordinance and data from the
Minneapolis Area Assocation of Realtors regarding buyer inspections and to then report back to the
City Council.
11/23/98 -12- DRAFT
On October 20, 1998, the Housing Commission reviewed the Council's concerns regarding the
ordinance and made the following final recommendations:
• 1. The Housing ommission moved to incorporate the language from the City of
g rP Y
Minneapolis' ordinance regarding the requirement to correct hazardous items even
if the house does not sell. This was done to clarify the proposed Brooklyn Center
ordinance. The Minneapolis ordinance language reads "all required repair /replace
items must be completed by the buyer or seller within 90 days of the date of the
disclosure report whether or not the property is sold, unless otherwise excepted by
this Chapter ".
2. The Housing Commission's motion also requested the Section 12 -1511
IMMEDIATE HAZARDS should be clarified particulary paragraph b in Section 12-
511 of the proposed ordinance.
Staff incorporated the revisions and an alternate (amended) ordinance was prepared for the Council
to review. No deletions were made to the original "Alternate" ordinance and the language added is
shown in bold face type which sets off the added language from the original published language.
The additions in the amended alternate ordinance incorporate language from the Minneapolis Time
of Sale Ordinance in Section 12 -1508 paragraph 3(a) and (b). Also, Section 12 -1508 (b) is amended
to extend the 90 day correction period when the buyer does the correction of hazardous materials.
The following Housing Commissioners were present Chair Robert Torres, Commissioner Ernie
. Erickson, Commissioner Donald Arm, Commissioner Lloyd Deuel and Commissioner Mark Yelich,
and Chair Torres discussed he believes this is a good ordinance to enhance for first time buyers.
Council further discussed the ordinance and the compliance issues. A question was raised about
residents that have no money to fix the issues that arise when an inspection is done. Mr. McCauley
discussed that a seller has 90 days and if the issues are not taken care of in the 90 day period, the
seller would be in violation of the ordinance, however, the ordinance could be changed to a longer
period of time.
Councilmember Hilstrom suggested having an article printed in the City Watch and having the
Housing Commissioners attend the January 11, 1999, Council meeting. This ordinance will be
brought back to the Council on January 11, 1999.
8d. RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES, PALMER LAKE BASIN WATER RESOURCES STUDY
Mr. McCauley discussed that the 1999 Storm Drainage Utility Budget includes $30,000 to hire a
consultant to study the Palmer Lake basin in great detail and prepare conceptual designs for specific
improvements.
11/23/98 -13- DRAFT
It is recommended that the Council authorize a contract for services to WSB and Associates for
professional services at Palmer Lake.
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -205
Councilmember Hilstrom introduced the following esolution and moved its adoption:
g P
RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, PALMER
LAKE BASIN WATER RESOURCES STUDY
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember
Peppe. Motion passed unanimously.
8e. REPORT ON CODE ENFORCEMENT
Mr. McCauley reported that the northern half of the City has been inspected and reinspected. The
Southeast quadrant is left and was left to be done last because of the storm damage.
Mr. McCauley also discussed that the Neighborhood Liaison Heather Ruzick is proposing a change
to the ordinance regarding refuse containers. Ms. Ruzick is proposing that Section 7 -102
Subdivision 4 be revised to read "Containers must be placed behind the front setback of the
residence or in the garage as opposed to being placed in the rear of the premises out of view from
the street in front of the residence ". Occassionally she receives a complaint from a citizen because .
a neighbor's container is in view from the front street and durin g a recent code swee p of a particular
neighborhood she generated 125 letters for code violations. Of the 125 violations, 97 were for
container placement only, no other violations were found for those 97 properties.
i
Mayor Kragness commended Ms. Ruzick on the great job she is doing.
This ordinance change will be on the December 14, 1998, agenda for first reading.
8f. 1999 PUBLIC UTILITIES RATE STUDY
- Resolution Adopting the 1999 Water Utility Rate Schedule
- Resolution Adopting the 1999 Sanitary Sewer Utility Rate Schedule
- Resolution Adopting the 1999 Storm Drainage Utility Rate Schedule
- Resolution Adopting the 1999 Recycling Rates
- Resolution Adopting the 1999 Water and Sanitary Sewer Hookup Rates
Mr. McCauley discussed that these resolutions were discussed at the Council's November 16, 1998,
Work Session and are recommended for approval this evening. The resolutions are consistent with
the five year planning study and support both operations and capital projects.
11/2
� 98
-14 DRAFT
Public Works Director Diane Spector stated she believes the increase rates are needed and reasonable
and that the rates are lower than other cities.
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -206
Councilmember Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1999 WATER UTILITY RATE SCHEDULE
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember
Carmody. Motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-207
Councilmember Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1999 SANIARY SEWER UTILITY RATE SCHEDULE
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember
Carmody. Motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -208
Councilmember Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1999 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY RATE SCHEDULE
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember
Carmody. Motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -209
Councilmember Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1999 RECYCLING RATES
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember
Carmody. Motion passed unanimously.
1 1/23/98 -15- DRAFT
-
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -210
Councilmember Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1999 WATER AND SANITARY SEWER HOOKUP RATES
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember
Carmody. Motion passed unanimously.
8g. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ASSESSMENT RATES FOR STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS IN 1999
Mr. McCauley discussed the City's annual establishment of assessment rates for street improvement
projects. It is the intent of the Council special assessments are levied against any property that can
be deemed to benefit from such an improvement. Assessments for residential properties are made
on a unit basis which applies to all single family residential properties benefitting from any street
improvement project that year, and are intended to represent a specific portion of the average cost
of reconstructing a typical residential street. Assessments for non - residential or multiple family
residential projects are computed separately for each project.
Councilmember Hilstrom inquired regarding the target for assessments as a percent of the entire
project cost of 40 percent. Ms. Spector advised that assessments are closely approaching that
percentage of project cost.
Council further discussed the progress of the assessments and that assessments for 1999 would be
a three percent increase, which is the same rate of increase as last year.
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -211
Councilmember Carmody introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ASSESSMENT RATES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECTS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS IN 1999
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember
Peppe. Motion passed unanimously.
11/23/98 -16- DRAFT
8h. REPORT ON HUMBOLDT AVENUE SUBSTATION
. Mr. McCauley reported that during the last several years the police substation located at Humboldt
Square has evolved into a Family Resource Center that is staffed and operated by Northwest
Hennepin Human Services Council. The police department continues to support the Family
Resources Center by presenting programs to children that participate in after school tutoring. The
rent for the Family Resource Center will be $400 per month beginning January 1, 1999.
The police department is requesting to no longer staff or have official affiliation with the Humboldt
Avenue Substation/Family Resources Center effective January 1, 1999, and support this request by
the following data:
1. The police department has not budgeted for rental of a store front.
2. The services offered have evolved from a law enforcement contact in the community
to a social service aspect. The Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council plans
to continue to offer services from the substation location.
3. The police department is moving to a facility within a block of the substation. The
new police facility will be serving the neighborhood far better than a substation.
Council discussed what would happen to the programs for youth. It was discussed there are many
organizations involved and the City's participation will not affect these programs.
A motion by Councilmember Hilstrom, seconded by Councilmember Carmody to no longer staff
or have official affiliation with the Humboldt Avenue Substation/Family Resource Center effective
January 1, 1999. Motion passed unanimously.
8i. REPORT ON ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR
EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER BUILDING ADDITIONS AND
RENOVATIONS
Mr. McCauley requested that this item be tabled to the December 14, 1998, Council meeting. A
motion by Councilmember Hilstrom, seconded by Councilmember Carmody to table this item to
December 14, 1999. Motion passed unanimously.
8j. STAFF REPORT REGARDING: WATER WORKS FACILITY STUDY
Mr. McCauley reported that the City's water utility engages an outside consultant to review the
water works facilities and to make recommendations regarding improvement. The last study was
conducted in 1989 by Black and Veatch. In 1998, the utility engaged Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik
and Associates (BRAA) to update that report and make recommendations.
11/23/98 -17- DRAFT
The report has found the City's water works facilities sound and adequate. The improvements
recommended in the study done by Black and Veatch have been completed with one exception. The
Black and Veatch report recommended drilling two additional wells. One has been completed, and
BRAA had confirmed staff's analysis that the second well is not necessary.
Ms. Spector further discussed the report and is recommending that the Council not pursue the option
of a treatment facility, as it is not required to meet federal drinking water standards.
However, if in the future the drinking water standards are amended to require treatment, then this
is useful and time - saving information to have as a starting point.
8k. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID, AND AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR
NEW WEST FIRE STATION AND EAST FIRE STATION REMODELING,
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1998 -10 AND 1998 -11
Mr. McCauley recommended awarding bids to the following bidders for the new East and West Fire
Station Remodeling, Improvement Project Nos. 1998 -10 and 1998 -11:
West Fire Station:
Landscaping Helmin Landscaping $ 41,500.00
Masonry Axel H. Oman, Inc. $ 39,000.00
Structural Wood Structural Wood Corp. $106,500.00
Carpentry Spicer Contracting $ 45,028.00
Roofing Commerical Roofing $142,205.00
Hollow Metal /Wood Doors Glewwe Doors, Inc. $ 32,850.00
Aluminum Entrances /Glazing Empirehouse, Inc. $ 74,972.00
Skylight W.L. Hall Company $ 15,103.00
Drywall Mulcahy Drywall, Inc. $ 93,570.00
Tile Twin City Tile/Marble $ 53,965.00
Acoustical Ceiling Twin City Acoustics $ 7,295.00
Carpet Gebert Floors $ 13,483 20
Special Flooring Diversified Coatings $ 22,439.00
Miscellaneous Specialties Specialty Sales Service $ 14,471.00
Lockers. JF Equipment $ 13,400.00
Fire Protection Brothers Fire Protection $ 28,730.00
East Fire Station:
Carpentry Kellington Construction $ 23,700.00
Roofing Commercial Roofing $ 88,554.00
Hollow MetanVood Doors Glew Doors, Inc. $ 9,260.00
Aluminum Entrances / Glaxing Minneapolis Glass $ 19,350.00
Drywall Berg Drywall, Inc. $ 45,900.00
11/2-3/98 -18- DRAFT
Tile Grazzini Brothers & Co. $ 24,495.00
Acoustical Ceilings Twin City Acoustics $ 5,725.00
Carpet Gebert Floors $ 4,284.86
Special Flooring Stonhard, Inc. $ 17,650.00
Miscellaneous Specialties Specialty Sales Service $ 11,180.00
Lockers JF Equipment $ 10,400.00
Fire Protection Brothers Fire Protection $ 7,595.00
Council discussed the progress of the buildings. Mr. McCauley discussed the construction is behind
because of the fabricator having been on strike and there being additional delays in receiving the
panels. The construction on the police building is over the targeted amount, however, the fire
stations are coming in around targeted prices. It is anticipated that the new buildings will be done
in August of 1999.
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -212
Councilmember Hilstrom introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID, AND AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR NEW WEST FIRE
STATION AND EAST FIRE STATION REMODELING, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1998-
10 AND 1998 -11
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember
Carmody. Motion passed unanimously.
9. ADJOURNMENT
A motion by Councilmember Hilstrom, seconded by Councilmember Carmody to adjourn the
meeting at 10:11 p.m. Motion passed unanimously.
City Clerk Mayor
11/23/98 -19- DRAFT
i
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
SPECIAL WORK SESSION
NOVEMBER 30, 1998
CITY HALL
CONFERENCE ROOM B
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met for a Special Work Session at Brooklyn Center City Hall
and was called to order by Mayor Myrna Kragness at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Myrna Kragness, Councilmembers Debra Hilstrom and Kay Lasman. Councilmember
Kathleen Carmody arrived at 7:20 p.m. Councilmember Robert Peppe was absent and excused.
Also present: City Manager Michael J. McCauley, Assistant City Manager/HR Director Jane
Chambers, Finance Director Charlie Hansen, Community Development Director Brad Hoffman,
EBHC Manager Judith Bergeland, and Recording Secretary Maria Rosenbaum.
PROPOSED 1999 MEETING SCHEDULE
City Manager Micheal McCauley asked the Council if they would like to continue with the second
and fourth Mondays of each month for Council meetings. It was the consensus of the Council to
keep the Council meetings on the second and fourth Mondays, however, the Council discussed the
possibility of changing the September 1999 meetings to the first and third Mondays.
Council discussed future meetings with other City Commissions. Mr. McCauley asked the Council
if they would like to meet with all the Commissions at one time to eliminate several meetings or if
they would like to have a joint meeting with each Commission. After further discussion it was the
consensus of the Council to meet with the Chairs of each Commission first and then have one joint
meeting with all Commissions in a presentation style.
Councilmember Kathleen Carmody arrived at 7:20 p.m.
It was the consensus of the Council to set March 29, 1999, for a Work Session to meet with the
Chairs of the each Commission, and a more social recognition will be held in April 1999.
11/310/98 -1- DRAFT
NEW COUNCIL MEMBER ORIENTATION
Mr. McCauley asked the Council their preference on the orientation of the new Council Member Ed
Nelson. Mr. McCauley suggested having a short meeting with Mr. Nelson to update him on the
goals of the Council and how the Council deals with issues, etc. This would also give Mr. Nelson
the opportunity to ask any questions he may have. It was the consensus of the Council to have a
short meeting with Mr. Nelson before the joint Planning Commission Meeting on December 17,
1998, at 6:30 p.m. Council discussed if food should be served and it was the consensus of the
Council everyone would bring something to share. City Staff will contact Mr. Nelson and have an
official notice posted if this date works for Mr. Nelson.
Mr. McCauley suggested discussing agenda items 6, 7, and 10 since EBHC Manager Judith
Bergeland was present.
REVIEW OF EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER BUILDING PROJECT
Community Development Director Brad Hoffman discussed that bids were opened for the work to
be done at the EBHC. The bids received were extremely high. Mr. Hoffman explained that the
reason the bids were so high is because of the construction market. Mr. Hoffman met with E & V
Consultants and Construction Managers to discuss possible cost saving items. A list of deductions
was available for the Council at the meeting. Mr. Hoffinan went through the list and discussed
items that he would like to see remain with the project. Mr. Hoffman said that there was a total of
$115,460 in deductions and addendums.
The Council discussed whether or not these deductions would make this project any less than first
proposed. Mr. Hoffman explained that by eliminating some of the listed items it would still create
the building that was originally proposed. Bids will be on the December 14, 1998, agenda.
EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER BUDGET
Mr. McCauley discussed that before the Council were projected target goals for the EBHC. Council
discussed from the materials provided the proposed budget. Mr. Hoffman and Ms. Bergeland will
monitor this budget and update the Council.
EARLE BROWN CATERING
Mr. McCauley discussed that D'Amico Catering's contract has expired. There have been several
negotiations with D'Amico Catering because D'Amico Catering has requested to have money up
front. Ms. Bergeland informed the Council that a health inspection failed recently.
11/310/98 -2- DRAFT
The biggest issue for the failure was cleaning issues. It is D'Amico Catering's responsibility to keep
the kitchen clean.
Several p erformance issues were discussed.
NORTH METRO MAYORS MEETING
Mr. McCauley discussed he would like direction from the Council on the City's participation in a
subregional coalition. After some discussion it was the consensus of the Council that Mr. Hoffman
would attend the meeting on December 1, 1998. It was noted that the Council is supportive of the
collaboration, however the City needs to carefully examine any new coalitions in light of budget and
staff constraints.
HERITAGE BOOK: HISTORICAL SOCIETY REQUEST FOR PATRON
PARTICIPATION (5500)
Mr. McCauley discussed the request from the Historical Society for patron participation. The
Historical Society is requesting $500. This money could be paid in 1999 or 2000. It was the
consensus of the Council to provide $500 to the Historical Society in the 1999 budget.
REVIEW OF GENERAL FUND BUDGET AND TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING
Mr. McCauley discussed the Truth in Taxation materials that would be presented at the meeting on
December 7, 1998. Councilmember Hilstrom commented that she preferred the pie charts and
thought they would be easier for the public to follow.
Council further discussed the overview that was provided in the materials and Mr. McCauley
provided answers to the Council's questions.
Councilmember Hilstrom requested that information be prepared for the Council regarding the
number of City employees. Mr. McCauley responded he will be provide this information.
GOLF COURSE: LOAN PAYMENT
Mr. McCauley discussed as reported previously, the golf course had reduced revenues during the
spring of this year due to the construction of the storm water ponds and associated structures. Since
the debt owed by the golf course was restructured beginning in 1998 to eliminate interest on the loan,
it was felt appropriate not to seek reimbursement from the Capital Improvement Fund for this lost
revenue experienced by the golf course. An evaluation indicated that the golf course appeared to be
on course to have an operating profit.
11/30/98 -3- DRAFT
Now that it is year end, the golf course will show an operating profit but will be slightly below the
amount of money necessary to make the entire principle only payment on the loan programmed for
1998. It was recommended that the amount of principle due in 1998 be reduced in 1998 by $30,000
and having this $30,000 deferred from 1998 and adding $2,000 per year in additional payments
starting in 2003. Council discussed their thoughts about starting in 2003, and it was the consensus
of the Council to have this payment start sooner than 2003. Mr. McCauley will amend the plan to
start sooner.
WATER, SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND RECYCLING POLICIES
Mr. McCauley discussed that included with the materials was information regarding targets for some
of the policies proposed. Mr. Hansen explained the two main things regarding these policies are cash
flow and emergency cash. Mr. Hansen suggested looking at all the factors and that there may be
funds that have more cash then needed. Mr. McCauley discussed this item will come back to the
Council for a formal consideration.
MISCELLANEOUS
Council viewed a site plan that was submitted for the Brookdale redevelopment.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Hilstrom made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 10:25 p.m., seconded by
Councilmember Lasman. Motion passed unanimously.
City Clerk Mayor
11 /30/98 -4- DRAFT
City Council Agenda Item No. 6b
i
City of Brooklyn Center
A great place to start. A great place to stay.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Maria Rosenbaum, Administrative Technician
DATE: December 9, 1998 k
SUBJECT: Licenses for Council Approval
The following companies /persons have applied for City licenses as noted. Each company /person
has fulfilled the requirements of the City Ordinance governing respective licenses, submitted
appropriate applications, and paid proper fees.
Licenses to be approved by the City Council on December 14, 1998:
POOL AND BILLIARD TABLES
Chi -Chi's Inc. #424 2101 Freeway Boulevard
• BOWLING ALLEY
Amf Earle Brown Lanes 6440 James Circle
COURTESY BENCH
U.S. Bench Corporation 3300 Avenue North, Minneapolis
GASOLINE SERVICE STATION
Brookdale Citgo 5710 Xerxes Avenue North
Christy's Auto Service 5300 Dupont Avenue North
Iten Chevrolet Company 6701 Brooklyn Boulevard
Metropolitan Council Transit 6845 Shingle Creek Parkway
Seaport, Inc. 6830 Brooklyn Boulevard
SuperAmerica #4058 1901 57th Avenue North
SuperAmerica #4160 6545 West River Road
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
Modern Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. 2318 1 st Street NE, Minneapolis
Northland Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 2900 Nevada Avenue North, New Hope
PUBLIC DANCE
Davidson Hotel d/b /a Minneapolis North Hilton 2200 Freeway Boulevard
6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 • City Hall & TDD Number (612) 569 -3300
Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number (612) 569 -3400 • FAX (612) 569 -3494
An Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunities Employer
Page 2 •
Licenses for Council Approval
December 14, 1998
POOL AND BILLIARD TABLES
C.D.L. 12322 Business Park Boulevard, Champlin
RENTAL DWELLING
Initial•
Todd Bleeker 3306 Lawrence Road
Renewal:
Curtis Cady 1312 72nd Avenue North
Kenneth Solie Evergreen Park Manor
SING HANGER
Gruppo, Inc. 2835 Harriet Avenue South, Minneapolis
TOBACCO RELATED PRODUCT
Brookdale Citgo 5710 Xerxes Avenue North
Brooklyn Center Municipal #1 1500 69th Avenue North
Brooklyn Center Municipal #3 1966 57th Avenue North
Davidson Hotel d/b /a Minneapolis North Hilton 2200 Freeway Boulevard
Duoos Brothers American Legion 4307 70th Avenue North
Fleming Companies, Inc. d/b /a Rainbow Foods 6350 Brooklyn Boulevard
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. 5801 Xerxes Avenue North
K -Mart 5930 Earle Brown Drive
Seaport, Inc. 6830 Brooklyn Boulevard
Speedway SuperAmerica LLC 1901 57th Avenue North
Tobacco Leaf 6300 Brooklyn Boulevard
Value Food Market 6804 Humboldt Avenue North
�QpflKLYN CFpr
BROOKLYN CENTER r
s
POLICE DEPARTMENT ~'
POLICE
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager Michael McCauley
FROM: Chief Joel Downer
DATE: December 1, 1998
SUBJECT: Consideration Of 1999 Liquor Licenses
All liquor licenses within the City of Brooklyn Center run concurrent with the calendar year. In
the case of intoxicating liquor, club, and wine licenses, forms must be forwarded to the State of
Minnesota before the renewal date to inform them of the licenses granted by the City.
A complete list of all licenses to be renewed for 1999 is also attached.
It is requested that the City Council approve the issuance of liquor licenses for 1999 at their
December 14, 1998 meeting.
JD:kh
councili991iglic.req
1999 Liquor Licenses
CLASS A On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License (80% or greater food) & Sunday:
GMRI, Inc.
dba/ The Olive Garden Italian Restaurant # 1253
1601 James Circle North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
CLASS B On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License (50 to 79% food) & Sunday:
Apple American Limited Partnership of Minnesota
dba/ Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar
1347 Brookdale Mall
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
dba/ AMF/Earle Brown Lanes
6440 James Circle North
® Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Brooklyn Center Beverage, Inc. (Holiday Inn)
dba/ Remington's
1501 Freeway Blvd
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Chi - Chi's, Inc.
dba/ Chi -Chi's Mexican Restaurante
2101 Freeway Boulevard
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Davidson Hotel Properties
dba/ Hilton Hotel
2200 Freeway Boulevard
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
GR of Minnesota, Inc.
dba/ The Ground Round
i 2545 County Road 10
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Class B On -Sale Intoxicating
Is
(50% to 79% food) & Sunday - continued:
TGI Friday's of MN, Inc.
dba/ T.G.I. Friday's
2590 Freeway Blvd
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Class F & Sunday On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License
D'Amico Catering, Inc.
dba/ D'Amico Catering at Earle Brown Heritage Center
6155 Earle Brown Drive
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
On -Sale Club Intoxicating Liquor License:
Duoos Bros. American Lesion, Post 630
dba/ American Legion
4307 70th Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
On -Sale Wine Licenses
Brooklyn Center Restaurant Inc.
dba/ 50's Grill
5524 Brooklyn Boulevard
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
Dayton's Iron Horse Liquors, Inc.
dba/ Dayton's Brookdale Inn
1100 Brookdale Center
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Denny's, Inc.
dba/ Denny's Restaurant # 1284
3901 Lakebreeze Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
Fuddruckers, Inc.
dba/ Fuddruckers
5800 Shingle Creek Pkwy
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
On -Sale 3.2 Matt Liquor Licenses:.
Brooklyn Center Restaurant Inc.
dba/ 50's Grill
5524 Brooklyn Boulevard
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
Donald G. Campagne
dba/ Beacon Bowl
6525 West River Road
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Donald Castleman
dba/ Chuckwagon Grill
1928 57th Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
City of Brooklyn Center
Centerbrook Golf Course & Central Park
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 5.5430
Davanni's Inc
dba/ Davanni's Pizza and Hot Hoagies
5937 Summit Drive
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Dayton's Iron Horse Liquors, Inc
dba/ Dayton's Brookdale Inn
1100 Brookdale Center
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Denny's Inc.
dba/ Denny's Restaurant # 1284
3901 Lakebreeze Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
Fuddruckers, Inc.
dba/ Fuddruckers
5800 Shingle Creek Pkwy
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
On -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor Licenses (continued):
Scoreboard Pizza, Inc.
dba/ Scoreboard Pizza
6816 Humboldt Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Yun's Restaurant Inc.
dba/ Denny's 96887
6405 James Circle
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Off -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor Licenses:
Holiday Stationstores, Inc.
dba/ Holiday Stationstore #292
420 66th Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc.
dba/ Jerry's New Market Brookdale
5801 Xerxes Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Fleming Companies, Inc.
dba/ Rainbow Foods
6350 Brooklyn Blvd
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
Speedway /SuperAmerica LLC
dba/ SuperAmerica #4160
6545 West River Road
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Speedway /SuperAmerica LLC
dba/ SuperAmerica #4058
1901 57th Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Georges Y. Gerges
dba/ Value Food
6804 Humboldt Ave N
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
r
License Totals: Class A =1, B = 7, F = 1, Club = 1, Wine = 4, On -Sale = 10, Off -Sale = 6, Sunday =9
Total Licenses = 39
liglic/licensee.lst 11/98
BROOKLYN CENTER OQOOKIYNCFNTF9
POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Joel Downer, Chief of Police
FROM: Kim Heiser, Staff Services Supervisor
P rI
DATE:
November 30, 1998
SUBJECT: Annual Liquor License Report
The following is a summary of all police activity involving those business establishments
within the City of Brooklyn Center possessing intoxicating liquor licenses, Classes A
through F, Wine, On -Sale Club, On -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor and Off -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor.
The reporting period is November 1, 1997 through October 31, 1998. Any
establishment not specifically mentioned had no calls for service.
None of the calls listed were related to violations of city ordinance or state statutes by
employees of the respective establishments.
CLASS A: On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License (80% or greater food) & Sunday
The Olive Garden Italian Restaurant - 1601 James Circle North
Total calls for service: 17
Alarms 2
H &R Property Damage Acc 1
Lockout 3
Miscellaneous 3
Property Damage Accident 1
Suspicious Activity 1
Theft & Theft Related 4
Vandalism 2
CLASS B: On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License (50 -79% or greater food) & Sunday
Applebees - 1347 Brookdale Center
Total calls for service: 64
Aid & Assist 2
Assault 2
Disturbing The Peace 13
Domestic 1
Forgery 1
Lockout 4
Miscellaneous Public 20
Suspicious Activity 6
Theft & Theft Related 12
Traffic 2
Vandalism 1
Brooklyn Center Beverage (Remineton's) - 1501 Freeway Blvd
Total calls for service: 92
Aid & Assist 1
Alarms 6
Assault 3
Disturbing the Peace 5
Domestic 1
Fight 2
Fire 4
Forgery 2
H &R. Property Damage Accidents 1
Lockouts 4
Misc Public 36
Motor Vehicle Theft 1
Obscenity 1
Robbery 1
Suspicious Activity 8
Theft 11
Traffic 3
Vandalism 2
CLASS B (continued)
Chi Chi's - 2101 Freeway Blvd
Total calls for service: 35
Aid & Assist 2
Alarms 4
Assault 1
Disturbing Peace 2
Domestic 2
H &R Property Damage Accs 2
Lockout 1
Misc Public 11
Suspicious Activity 3
Theft 6
Traffic Stop 1
Earle Brown Bowl - 6440 James Circle N
Total calls for service: 116
Aid & Assist 13
Assault 4
Disturbing Peace 10
DL Violations 3
Domestic 3
Drugs 4
DUI 2
Fight 2
Fire 1
Forgery 1
H &R Prop Damage Acc 1
Lockout 6
Misc Public /All Other 34
Motor Vehicle Theft 1
Property Damage Accidents 2
Suspicious Activity 10
Theft 15
Traffic Accidents 1
Vandalism 3
CLASS B (continued)
The Ground Rotund - 2545 County Road 10
Total calls for service: 29
Aid.& Assist 3
Alarms 2
Disturbing Peace 1
DUI 1
Forgery 1
Lockout 3
Misc Public 10
Property Damage Accidents 2
Suspicious Activity 1
Theft 3
Vandalism 1
Traffic Stop 1
Hilton Hotel - 2200 Freeway Blvd
Total calls for service: 124
Aid & Assist 9
Assault 8
Driving Violations 2
Disturbing Peace 7
Drugs 2
Fight 2
Fire 3
Forgery 1
H &R Property Damage 2
Lockout 5
Misc Public 38
Motor Vehicle Theft 1
Property Damage Accidents 1
Sex Crimes 1
Suspicious Activity 15
Theft 16
Traffic Stops 3
Traffic Accidents 1
Vandalism 7
CLASS B (continued)
TGI Fridays - 2590 Freeway Blvd
Total calls for service: 19
Alarms 5
Driving Violations 1
Disturbing Peace 1
Fire 2
H &R Property Damage 1
Lockout 1
Misc Public 2
Property Damage Accident 1
Suspicious Activity 1
Theft 2
Vandalism 2
CLASS F: On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License & Sunday
D'Amico's Catering At Earle Brown Heritage Center
Total calls for service: 2
Alarm 1
Theft 1
ON SALE CLUB Intoxicating Liquor License
Duuos Brothers American Legion Post 630.
Total calls for service: 8
Alarms 3
Burglary 1
Misc Public 1
Traffic Stops 2
Vandalism 1
ON -SALE WINE & 3.2 Malt Liquor
SD's Grill - 5524 Brooklyn Blvd
Total calls for service:
22
Aid & Assist 3
Alarms 1
Forgery 1
Lockout 2
Miscellaneous Public 9
Suspicious Activity 2
Theft 2
Vandalism 2
Davton's Ironhorse Grill - 1100 Brookdale Center
Total calls for service: 183
Aid & Assist 2
Alarms 3
Assault 2
Disturbing Peace 5
Domestic 1
Forgery 17
Indecent Conduct 1
Lockout 14
Miscellaneous Public 25
Property Damage Accidents 2
Suspicious Activity 11
Theft & Theft Related 97
Traffic Stops 2
Vandalism 1
Theft
Denny's - 3901 Lakebreeze Ave
Total calls for service: 32
Aid & Assist 4
Damage to Property 1
Disturbing Peace 1
Fight 1
ON -SALE WINE & 3.2 Malt Liquor (continued)
Forgery 1
H &R Property Damage 1
Lockout 3
Misc Public 8
Suspicious Activity 2
Theft 9
Vandalism 1
Fitildruckers - 2800 Shingle
Creek Pkwy
Y
Total calls for service: 42
Aid & Assist 1
Alarms 27
Misc Public 3
Property Damage Accident 1
Theft 3
Traffic Stop 7
Denny's - 6405 James s Circle
Total calls for service: 42
Aid & Assist 2
Dog Bite 2
Fight 1
Forgery 3
Found Property 1
Lockout 5
Misc Public 15
Suspicious Activity 3
Theft 9
Vandalism 1
ON -SALE 3.2 MALT LIQUOR
Beacon Bowl - 5625 Lyndale Ave N
s
Total calls for service: 3
ON -SALE 3.2 MALT LIQUOR (continued)
Miscellaneous Public 1
Motor Vehicle Theft 1
Suspicious Activity 1
City of Brooklvn Center /Centerbrook Golf Course & Central Park
Total calls for service: 31
Alarms 14
Harassment 1
Lockout 1
Miscellaneous Public 4
Suspicious Activity 4
Theft 3
Vandalism 4
Chuckwa .aon Grill - 5720 Morgan Ave N
Total calls for service: 5
Miscellaneous Public 1
Motor Vehicle Theft 1
Suspicous Activity 1
Threats 1
Vandalism 1
Davanni's Pizza & Hot Hoavies - 5937 Summit Drive
Total calls for service: 12
Assault 1
Disturbing Peace 1
Fire 2
Lockout 2
Miscellaneous Public 4
Suspicious Activity 1
Theft 1
ON -SALE 3.2 MALT LIQUOR (continued)
Scoreboard - 6816 Humboldt Ave N
Total calls for service: 9
Misc Public 5
Suicide Attempt 1
Suspicious Activity 3
OFF -SALE 3.2 MALT LIQUOR
Jerrv's NewNlarket - 5801 Xerxes Ave N
Total calls for service: 83
Aid & Assist 2
Alarms 1
Disturbing Peace 4
DL Violations 1
Domestic 1
Forgery 3
H &R Property Damage Acc 2
Lockout 5
Misc Public 25
Property Damage Accidents 3
Robbery 1
Suspicious Activity 11
Theft 23
Vandalism 1
Rainbow Foods - 6350 Brooklyn Blvd
Total calls for service: 162
Aid & Assist 3
Alarms 12
Assault 1
Disturbing Peace 11
Domestic 1
Fight 2
OFF -SALE 3.2 MALT LIQUOR (continued)
Forgery 8
H &R Property Damage Accidents 8
Lockout 18
Miscellaneous Public 32
Motor Vehicle Theft 1
Property Damage Accidents 4
Suspicous Activity 19
Theft & Theft Related 37
Traffic Stops 4
Vandalism 1
SuverAmerica (West River Road)
Total calls for service: 182
Aid & Assist 8
Alarms 4
Assault 1
Disturbing Peace 5
Domestic 2
Driving Violations 4
Fire 1
Forgery 2
H &R Property Damage Acc 3
Lockout 11
Loitering 1
Misc Public 45
Motor Vehicle Theft 1
Robbery 1
Sex Crimes 1
Suspicious Activity 8
Theft & Theft Related 67
Traffic Accident 5
Traffic Stops 9
Vandalism 3
OFF -SALE 3.2 MALT LIQUOR (continued)
SuDerAmerie(I (571h Avenue)
Total calls for service: 112
Aid & Assist 6
Alarms 2
Assault 2
Disturbing Peace 3
Driving Violations 1
False Information 1
Forgery g
H &R Property Damage Acc 1
Lockout 1
Misc Public 17
Property Damage Accidents 3,
Robbery 1
Suspicious Activity 6
Theft & Theft Related 53
Threats 1
Traffic Stops 2
Vandalism 3
Iiglidanupt
BROOKLYN CENTER r
POLICE DEPARTMENT - y
�
POLICE
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager Michael McCa lf- �
I
FROM: Chief Joel Downer
DATE: December 8, 1998
SUBJECT: Consideration Of 1999 Pawn Shop License
All pawn shop licenses within the City of Brooklyn Center run concurrent with the calendar year.
Cash n Pawn has applied for a renewal of their license for their business located at 1964 57th
Ave N. All necessary paperwork and appropriate fees have been submitted
It is requested that the City Council approve the issuance of a pawnshop license for 1999 for
Cash n Pawn.
JD:kh
counciU99pa«nxeq
City Council Agenda Item No. 6c
• MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Ronald A. Warren, Planning and Zoning Specialist
� •'�`-' '
Planning g P
SUBJECT: Site Performance Guarantee Releases
DATE: December 7, 1998
The following site performance guarantees being held by the City for completion of various site
improvements and conditions of approval are recommended to the City Council for release:
1. Minnesota State High School League
2100 Freeway Boulevard
Planning Commission Application No. 88010
Amount of Guarantee - $25,000 (Performance Bond)
is Obligor - Lund Martin Construction, Inc.
All site improvements and conditions for which a site performance guarantee was
posted have been installed or completed relating to this 1988 project. The City
Council on November 27, 1989 had approved a reduction of the guarantee amount
from $58,000 to $25,000 pending completion of some curbing improvements and the
submission to the City Engineer of an as -built survey with utility information. These
matters have been satisfactorily addressed and the balance of the guarantee ($25,000)
can be released in its entirety.
2. Cross of Glory Lutheran Church
5929 Brooklyn Boulevard
Planning Commission Application No. 96013
Amount of Guarantee - $20,000 (Certificate of Deposit)
Obligor - Cross of Glory Lutheran Church
All site improvements and conditions for which a site performance guarantee was
posted have been installed or completed relating to the church's 1996 fellowship hall
addition and church remodeling. Most of the improvements were completed in 1997.
Most recently, dead evergreen trees were replaced and a chain used to separate a
portion of the church parking lot used by the adjacent office building has been
Correction 12 -14 -98
reinstalled. The $20,000 certificate of deposit held to assure completion of these
matters may now be released in its entirety.
3. Sunlite III, LLP
6601 Shingle Creek Parkway
Planning Commission Application No. 97003
Amount of Guarantee - $85,000 (Performance Bond)
Obligor - Sunlite III, LLP, Gerald Steffens, President
All site improvements and conditions for which a site performance guarantee was
posted have been installed and completed relating to this 1997 building project. Most
of the landscaping and other improvements were installed or completed by the fall of
1997. The landscaping has survived an entire growing year and all other
improvements have been installed. The $85,000 performance bond held to assure
completion of all site improvements may now be released in its entirety.
City Council Agenda Item No. 6d
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Charlie Hansen, Finance Director Co N
DATE: December 4, 1998
SUBJECT: Resolution Declaring that the City does not Waive the
Statutory Limit on Municipal Tort Liability for the Purpose
of Renewing Insurance Policies for the 1999 Year
Attached is a resolution which provides that the City does not waive the monetary limits
on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. The 1997 legislature
increased the municipal tort liability limits to $300,000 per claimant and $750,000 per
occurrence, effective on January 1, 1998. Also included in the legislation is a requirement
that the City Council decide to waive or not to waive the statutory limits. The League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust asks that this declaration be made prior to the inception
of the policy year.
•
LMCIT LIABILITY COVERAGE - WAIVER FORM
Cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide
whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The
decision to waive or not 7o waive the statutory limits has the following effects:
If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no
more than $300,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which -all claimants
would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be-limited
to $750,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city purchases the
optional excess liability coverage.
If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single
claimant could potentially recover up to $750,000 on a single occurrence. The total which all claimants
would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be
limited to $750,000, regardless of the number of claimants.
If the city waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant
could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all
claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would
also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants.
Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision.
® This decision must be made b the city council. Cities purchasing y y s p basing coverage must complete and return
this form to LMCIT before the effective date of the coverage. For further information, contact LMCIT.
You may also wish to discuss these issues with your city attorney.
The City of Brooklyn Center accepts liability coverage limits of $ 750,000 from the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT).
Check one:
XXX The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established
by Minnesota Statutes 466.04.
The city WAIVES the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes
466.04, to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT.
Date of city council meeting
Signature Position
• Return this completed form to LMCIT, 145 University Ave. W., St. Paul, MN. 55103 -2044
Page 1 of 1
its adoption: Member introduced the following resolution and moved
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING THAT THE CITY DOES NOT WAIVE THE
STATUTORY LIMIT ON MUNICIPAL TORT LIABILITY FOR THE PURPOSE
OF RENEWING INS(JRANC'E POLICIES FOR THE 1999 YEAR
WHEREAS, the Director of Finance and the City's Insurance Agent are negotiating
annual renewal premiums for the City's comprehensive insurance coverage for the period from
January 1, 1999 to January 1, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has set the statutory limit on tort liability at
$750,000 for Minnesota cities and requires city councils to make a decision to stay with or to
waive this limit; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Finance does not recommend waiving the statutory
limit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that the City does not waive the monetary limits on municipal tort liability
established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04.
•
Date Mayor
ATTEST.
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
City Council Agenda Item No. 6e
MEINIOR AND UM
DATE: December 8, 1998
TO: Michael McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Scott Brink, City Engineer`
SUBJECT: Resolution Accepting Work Performed and Authorizing Final Payment,
Improvement Project No. 1998 -12, Contract 1998 -0, Landscaping Nodes
Upgrade
The 1998 MSA budget included $50,000 for repairs and upgrade of landscaping nodes in the
Earle Brown Farm commercial area. On August 10, 1998 the City Council awarded a contract to
Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc. in the amount of $35,421.30 for Contract 1998 -0.
This project consisted of the improvements to the existing streetscape nodes on Summit Drive
between Shingle Creek Parkway and Earle Brown Drive. Improvements to the nodes on John
Martin Drive were completed with that roadway project.
Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc. has completed the work as specified. The final contract in
the amount of $40,632.68 is 15% over the original contract bid. A 10% contingency had been
provided for in the original contract estimate. The cost overrun can be attributed primarily to an
overall underestimation of quantities. Upon commencement of the project, it was determined in
the field that some additional amounts of concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, and sidewalk paver
replacements were necessary to fully complete the project in satisfactory fashion. It should be
mentioned however, that the total project cost is 12% less than the as -bid estimated cost due to
reductions in landscaping and administrative costs.
Recommended City Council Action
Approve the attached resolution accepting work performed and authorizing final payment to
Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc.
•
® its adoption: Member introduced the following resolution and moved
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND AUTHORIZING FINAL
PAYMENT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1998 -12, CONTRACT 1998 -0,
LANDSCAPING NODES UPGRADE
WHEREAS, the 1998 MSA Fund included $50,000 for the repair and upgrade of
landscaping nodes in the Earle Brown Farm commercial area; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc. has satisfactorily completed the following
improvement in accordance with said contract:
Improvement Project 1998 -12, Contract 1998 -0, Landscape Nodes Upgrade
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The work under said project is accepted and approved according to the
following schedule:
As Bid Final Amount
Contract $35,421.30 $40,632.68
Contingency (10%) $ 3.542.13
Subtotal $38,963.43 $40,632.98
Admin. /Engineering /Legal $ 5,000.00 $ 2,250.00
Landscaping Materials $ 5.000.00 $ 817.93
Total Project Cost $48,963.43 $43,700.91
REVENUE
Municipal State Aid -Local $48.963.43
2. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said contract, taking the
Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be paid for said improvement under said contract
shall be $40,632.68.
i
RESOLUTION NO.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
e
e
City Council Agenda Item No. 6f
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 10, 1998
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Scott A. Brink, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Resolution Approving Change Order No. 1, and Supplemental Agreement No. 1,
Accepting Work Performed and Authorizing Final Payment, Improvement Project
No. 1998 -26, Contract 1998 -G, Relocation of 16" Water Main and Appurtenances
at West Fire Station
On May 1, 1998, the City Council awarded a contract to Northdale Construction in the amount of
$64,741.96 for Contract 1998 -G. The work essentially provided for the relocation of a 16 inch
water main loop to provide for the construction of the West Fire Station.
Northdale Construction has completed the original contract work as specified. The original final
contract amount of $72,741.86 is 12 per cent higher than the contract bid. The increase can be
attributed to additional pipe fitting quantities and an oversize 16" valve manhole that was needed
• during the course of the work. A 10 per cent contingency had been provided to cover any
additional costs incurred.
After the completion of the original contract for the water main location, it was deemed most
cost - effective and in the best interest of the City to have Northdale complete the on -site
underground storm system, requiring a change order and supplemental agreement.
The amount of Change Order No. 1: $24,712.73
The amount of Supplemental Agreement No. 1: $15.022.61
Total $39,735.34
A breakdown of the Change Order and Supplemental Agreement costs are provided in the
attached Resolution, and can be summarized as follows: Change Order 1 provided for Northdale
to connect the site with the City storm sewer on 63rd Avenue while the Contractor was still
mobilized at the site. After Northdale's obligation was completed and work on the actual site and
building commenced and proceeded, it was determined that Northdale was best suited to
complete the remainder of the storm sewer; thus reflected as Supplemental Agreement No. 1.
It is therefore recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution Approving
Change Order No. 1, Supplemental Agreement No. 1, Accepting Work and Authorizing Final
Payment, Improvement Project No. 1998 -26, Contract 1998 -G, Relocation of 16" Water Main
and Appurtenances at West Fire Station.
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, AND SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT NO. 1, ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND AUTHORIZING FINAL
PAYMENT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1998 -26, CONTRACT 1998 -G,
RELOCATION OF 16" WATER MAIN AND APPURTENANCES AT WEST FIRE
CTATTnN
WHEREAS, pursuant to written contract signed with the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, Northdale Construction has satisfactorily completed the following improvement in
accordance with said contract:
Improvement Project No. 1998 -26, Contract 1998 -G, Relocation of 16" Water Main and
Appurtenances at West Fire Station
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota that:
1. Change Order No. 1 and Supplemental Agreement No. 1 is hereby approved.
2. The work under said project is accepted and approved according to the following
• schedule:
COST As Bid Final Amount
Contract $64,741.96 $ 72,741.86
Contingency (10%) $ 6.479.19 $ -0-
Subtotal $71,216.15 $ 72,741.86
Change Order No. 1 $ 24,712.73
Supplemental Agreement No. 1 $ 15,022.61
Admin. /Engr. /Legal $ 5.000.00 $ 2.778.00
Total $76,216.15 $115,255.20
REVENUE
Water Utility Fund $76,216.15 $ 75,519.86
Capital Improvement Fund $ 39,735.34
3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said contract, taking the
Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be paid for said improvement
under said contract shall be $112,477.20.
RESOLUTION NO.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
S
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER & SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
CONTRACT 1998 -26
CITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1998 -G
PROJECT: RELOCATION OF 16" WATER MAIN AND APPURTENANCES AT WEST FIRE
STATION
CONTRACTOR: NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
CHANGE ORDER NO: ONE
DATE: November 9, 1998
EXPLANATION: COMPLETION OF STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION ON SITE AND
CONNECTION OF THIS SYSTEM WITHIN 63RD AVENUE NO. THIS WORK WAS NOT
INCLUDED IN THE ORIGINAL BID FOR THE WATER MAIN RELOCATION.
CHANGE ORDER ITEMS INCLUDE THOSE ITEMS ORIGINALLY BID BUT QUANTITIES
INCREASED.
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT ITEMS INCLUDE THOSE ITEMS ADDED TO THE
CONTRACT FOR WHICH NO UNIT PRICE HAD BEEN ORIGINALLY RECEIVED.
CHANGE ORDER NO. ONE
ADD
Unit
Item No. Item Unit Quantitv Price Amount
1 15" HDPE L.F. 231 $ 24.83 $ 5,735.73
2. 63RD AVE BIT. PATCH S.Y. 114 $ 63.00 $ 7,182.00
3. 15" RCP STORM L.F. 80 $ 61.50 $ 4,920.00
4. STORM STRUCT. EA. 5 $1,375.00 $ 6.875.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. ONE $24,712.73
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. ONE
Date: November 9, 1998
ADD
Unit
Item No. Item unit Ouantitv ice Amount
1. REMOBILIZATION L.S. 1 $4,500.00 $ 4,500.00
2. 12" HDPE L.F. 126 $ 24.83 $ 2,835.00
3. CONNECT TO PIPE EA. 1 $1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
4. REM. & REPL. B -618 L:F. 38 $ 19.50 $ 741.00
5. BIT. PARK. LOT S.Y. 92.5 $ 38.50 $ 3,561.25
6. CL 5 LIMESTONE S.Y. 61 $ 11.50 $ 701.50
7. 10" PVC& CAP L.F. 26 $ 18.61 $ 483.86
8. RECONST. C.B. EA 2 $ 350.00 $ 700.00
TOTAL SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. ONE $15,022.61
• Original Contract Amount $ 64,741.96
Final Contract Amount $ 72,741.86
Change Order No.One $ 24,712.73
Supplemental Agreement No. One $ 15.022.61
Amended Contract Amount $112,477.20
ACCEPTED BY:
By Date
Contractor
RECOMMENDED BY:
By Date
RECOMMENDED BY:
By Date
Director of Public Works
APPROVED BY:
By Date
City Manager
Approved by City Council on
Date
City Council Agenda Item No. 6g
s
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 30, 1998
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Scott Brink, City Engineer
SUBJECT: An Ordinance Vacating a Drainage and Utility Easement- REGAL ROAD
DEVELOPMENT SECOND ADDITION
On November 23, 1998, the City Council approved a Resolution Approving the Final Plat,
REGAL ROAD DEVELOPMENT SECOND ADDITION. This final plat essentially supersedes
an initial plat titled REGAL ROAD DEVELOPMENT ADDITION.
As described previously, the newly created plat had been submitted to provide for a property
transfer between two neighboring parties. The second plat was submitted in order to allow Super
America to acquire an additional strip of land along the south boundary of their property to
accommodate a proposed car wash expansion (see attached plan). The property transfer consists
of an approximate 25 ft. by 320 ft. strip of land added to the Super America property.
• This strip f land was covered b drainage an utility easement under the old lat. Typically,
e du h
P Y g Y P YP Y
when a new plat is submitted, the drainage and utility easements platted under the old plat are
superseded by the platted drainage and utility easements recorded under the new plat. However,
for purposes of satisfying title administrative details, Super America has requested that a formal
vacation or relinquishing of a portion of a platted drainage and utility easement on the initial plat
be conducted. The easement described is not needed, and therefore was not provided under the
revised plat (REGAL ROAD DEVELOPMENT SECOND ADDITION) approved by the City
Council on November 23. However, Super America has requested that the easement be formally
vacated to satisfy their title company.
A formal vacation of the drainage and utility easement described in the attached Resolution has
therefore been submitted for a first reading at the December 14, 1998 City Council meeting. A
second reading will be scheduled for the January 11, 1999 City Council meeting.
® CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 11th day of January, 1999, at 7
p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek
Parkway, to consider an ordinance to vacate a public roadway.
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance.
Please contact the City Clerk at 569 -3300 to make arrangements.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY FASEMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An underlying platted drainage and utility easement provided for under
the plat REGAL ROAD DEVELOPMENT ADDITION as described below, is hereby vacated:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot 3, REGAL ROAD DEVELOPMENT
ADDITION, thence North 4 degrees 58 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of
21.47 feet; thence North 85 degrees 01 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of
320.95 feet; thence southerly along the East line of Lot 1 a distance of 25.00 feet,
thence South 85 degrees 01 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 320.95 feet,
thence northerly to the point of beginning, and there terminating.
Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and thirty days following
its legal publication.
Adopted this day of 1999.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
® (Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.)
2 52 •
A Y N0.
H I G H 1
�j F
H
2 °
. = 3 35 48
TA 3 67 40
L=
R= 58 7 2 X 737 "E ....�
• R
CC: II S5� 5 108 11E ,4�__ Pr l ° 15' c "
.7 � ° 3
I I �.
9 _ _ �4
r
I I. I r — 32. __.--
i I10 145
II wr I • r� /-'� /� � -I 1 �I �1•` t\� • � � N X \ \ f r— _�
ST9ACx
SINE. \. \ l01
I .L• I /` ' }� �, - %': � � � � U r ho \ � `� ��' SRc
4 k; DRAINAGE d 0 y
,.�I` R EASE,
� a m PER PLAT N E R
DEVELOPMENT OApj
\9.1."' IOPUENT1� Tf9 I
/
. �,c? �. ' [ �I� �' o l r
j =
I II I;� }_,F�,/
' •I l ii''� �, 0 `• I L L'" ,� f :�� 145 1 \
I 10 67
` Zi��: � [� N 1•• ��.. ° .r.0 - � , \'I I — \•` "x55'31'02 "E —. .� J _
1
S �i '. � _ - '938 _ -' �•' —
c+ Z
A cq
r no
-
�5•, \' '`�°•, j M ("y1`0 o G \ ( 7 I , „ �/ ' / �' 4 •�
�'• '��� y -n \ J —SG�S \� (��
.4 BVLDING SETBACX
_ l-�]O• W.D EA P' t ifX OOCW[MI M0. )�t0!)
Cs
_
�-
_ Yf
OWN. _ LOTS I " - RL ROAP \ \
ALf)ITII,
'ES
""co- TL. I TO \
J., FORTH TII STRE, -
/It[
i_I). WISC�..'ISIN ' i5
rr ' PROPERTIES REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT. LLC - •,t n( r�• h.,� :,I
Bann w�nc unnn 11 7, , _ _
REGAL HOA
p
� r �
�J v
1 A �/ 1 ��•
r n -� r f
✓ n 1 L �=3 °
c � x` 367.40
R 5852.73711E
o, C.BRC. ;=S7
c� 39 0 E �!3 °15'
5 8 23 ' �- — 145 x=332.
•- o
v t� �� �ORAINAC.E h U(1{,I)1' Fgcp MEN�1
ul
Z,
o N A
S4'58 ' "E
143.18
$4.550 �i t )042< -
' �(,') �,; � � � � ?, .1 �- -" --�- ;?{ •• - -3.54
�-- 68.18' 3
7.59 139.6 5 5
_ 59261 4 I' � --
Ir
{: I ( ` // 1� L _ V
4
1.
c i
o sue
l p \ y
• • � � � 0 � "' .15 � �
`
• -;- L7 ,?. o :off -- -796. - - -
• L7YC - o _ / A
\ f vv! �L�•r!
City Council Agenda Item No. 6h
•
• MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 30, 1998
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Scott Brink, City Engineer 5V
SUBJECT: An Ordinance Vacating Easements for Street Purposes - BROOKLYN CENTER
POLICE STATION WEST
As part of the construction of the new Police and Public Safety facility on Humboldt Avenue, the
property is in the process of being re- platted into a new plat to be titled "BROOKLYN CENTER
POLICE STATION WEST."
As part of the re- platting, certain recorded easements on the property are no longer needed and
must be vacated. In particular, two 30 foot easements dedicated for public street purposes across
the northwest rear of the property need to be vacated (see attached exhibit). The 30 foot
dedications were originally dedicated many years ago to provide for any possible extension of
Irving Avenue North. In consideration of current property uses and the City's Comprehensive
Plan, no such extension of Irving Avenue is considered practical or necessary. In addition,
vacation of the roadway dedication is necessary to allow for the intended development and use of
the property.
Preliminary and Final Plat submittals for Council consideration will be submitted when the plats
are completed and made available by the engineering firm retained by the City.
Formal vacation of the street easements described in the attached Resolution have therefore been
submitted fora first reading at the December 14, 1998 City Council meeting. A second reading
will be scheduled for the January 11, 1999 City Council meeting.
• CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 11th day of January, 1999, at 7
p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek
Parkway, to consider an ordinance to vacate a public roadway.
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance.
Please contact the City Clerk at 569 -3300 to make arrangements.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE VACATING STREET EASEMENTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Street easements provided for and recorded as document numbers
789889 and 789760, located within Registered Land Survey No. 993, together as described below,
are hereby vacated:
The west 30 feet of Tracts A and D, Registered Land Survey Number 993.
Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and thirty days following
its legal publication.
Adopted this day of , 1999.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
(Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.)
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 9
N HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA _
5CACE�1 ".40' C. E. CO L1 ER
Aenoke-. . monurneM Registered Land Survey(
Ail bearings are assumQcl.
388.25 "T' 328.25 ,�
JbM
1 ` �N.E.corner 6
I
A � Or l h line of NE /q of NE /q, - b e �
1 Sec35,Twp119
I North line of OL of S' / of S% of N04 of W04, Sec.35,TwpA19 N, Rge. 2►W
329.79 1
30.09:
....164.89 .... X30 N
cp
ro Or
30 I
I 0 O d l O Z
i co ��R A C T A T R A •C T ,B a
y�Lp
d a` S 89 S9� 53 E r o
I w 4 164.97.... 164.95.... o
- U)
a I Q `9 ° -30. 134.87... �34.8ro... I' •30.09' � 9 _
a� 2
S 7 a 2 u
o
cc � �Ip •o to
CQ R A C T D co T R A C T i C
i
30 ....165.03 • ... ....165.02 • ... � �
30,1 I 134.93 • • • t34.93... 30 ..'
N 89 59'45 "W
.... 330.05 ... /
' South line of W' / 4 S' /2 1� S% of NE %4 of ME 1 /4 , Sec. 3S , - Ywp, 119N, Rge.21 W. I
f ' Q Sr Corner o {NE�q of NE %a 1
r South line o NE /a o{ NE / .Sec . 35, Twp.119N, Rge.D W
BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE STATION WEST
E T
0
NE
� �
T
M'ahlt tAE or ,-c VA W 1?e � r/4 �" ( T 1 111 as
..
�MOR7N Lt'[ Of' Rly
— --- --- - k »trxl-ti, uo iss,oa� t h--
g I —' t ----- - - - - -- ` :s—
--
—uTUtt a I(
TH -
w ow+�oc C�Styorr 11
,-
ES
EAR r ..o
AREAS ARE E
TO BE VACATED i ul ,�: } i 1 - -...
e LOT t
j
_ _ ►- _ - 1 1
UMM
usarorT
BLOCK 1
f I I
k = , 'v „
3o4el >x or ras mm 14" k r � 329.y7 kEU. ewr eti nm
3OUld LW OF 1W MC 1/4 Cr Rlf /E 1/4 OF SFG 31 336 RU N0. 1�
A
\1I
I
5FL7RT1% C'AdER
T 119 11
LEGEND a r w
O SET IRON PIPE REG. NO. 15472
• FOUND IRCN PIPE
.® HENNEPIN COUNTY CAST IRON M`IUMENT FOUND
NO"
/gyp � �y
FOR THE PURP=S OF 1141S U
1S PT. THE EAST LINE OF TH o
E f AP ' IC SCALE
HE 1/4 OF 7}+E NE 1/4 OF SECTION 39 IS ASSUMED TO Q m .o
BEAR SOO'45 I
t na � 40 e1, ti1G
City Council Agenda Item No. 6i
e MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 9, 1998
TO: Michael McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Scott Brink, City EngineerW
SUBJECT: Resolution Approving Change Order No. 1, Change Order No. 2, Accepting Work
Performed And Authorizing Final Payment, Miscellaneous Sidewalk Removal,
Replacement and Installation, Improvement Project No. 1997 -16,
Contract 1997 -K
On August 8, 1997, the City Manager accepted quotations in the amount of $23,187.50 for said
project. The final contract construction cost exceed the original bid in the amount of $7,827.58
due to the following:
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
e During the course of the miscellaneous sidewalk portion of the contract, additional removals
were required to complete the areas deemed as trip hazards. The original quantities were
underestimated and increased the contract in the amount of $6,017.08.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2.
During the course of the 51 st Avenue North sidewalk installation, the private driveway at 5050
Brooklyn Boulevard had to be removed to provide for an acceptable grade across the new
sidewalk installation. This increased the contract in the amount of $2,500.50.
It is therefore recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution Approving
Change Order No. 1, Change Order No. 2, Accepting Work Performed and Authorizing Final
Payment, Improvement Project No. 1997 -16, Contract 1997 -K.
® Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, CHANGE ORDER NO. 2,
ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT,
MISCELLANEOUS SIDEWALK REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT AND INSTALLATION,
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1997 -16, CONTRACT 1997 -K
WHEREAS, pursuant to written contract signed with the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, Halvorson Concrete Inc. has satisfactorily completed the following improvement in
accordance with said contract:
Improvement Project No. 1997 -16, Contract 1997 -K, Miscellaneous Sidewalk Removal,
Replacement & Installation
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota that:
1. Change Order No. 1 and Change Order No. 2 are hereby approved.
2. The work under said project is accepted and approved according to the following
schedule:
COST As Bid Final Amount
Contract $23,187.50 $22,497.50
Contingency $ 2,318.75
Change Order No. 1 $ 6,017.08
Change Order No. 2 $ 2.500.50
Sub -Total $25,506.25 $31,015.08
Engineering $ 2.000.00 $ 1.675.29
TOTAL PROJECT COST $27,506.25 $32,690.37
REVENUE
Local State Aid $27,506.25 $32,690.37
3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said contract, taking the
Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be paid for said improvement
under said contract shall be $31,015.08
•
•
RESOLUTION NO.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
City Council Agenda Item No. 6j
1
•
OUYN CE.V
BR
O
o�
YN CENTER
POLICE DEPARTMENT'
POLICE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Joel Downer, Chief of Polic
DATE: December 4, 1998
SUBJECT: Minnesota Auto Theft Prevention Grant
The Auto Theft Prevention Board will be accepting grant applications for fiscal year 2000 (July
1, 1999 through June 30, 2000) with applications being due December 31, 1998. The Auto Theft
Prevention Board will be reviewing applications at the January and February Board of Directors
meetings. Detective Kevin Benner has prepared a grant application. I request permission for the
police department partment to apply for this grant.
D
The -rant application process will be expedited if the City Council passes a resolution stating
that the grant money will be accepted by the City of Brooklyn
Center. The City P tY y h Council should
also identify the individual who has the signing authority for the grant.
The Brooklyn Center Police Department participated in an auto theft grant from July of 1997
through June of 1998. Comparison statistics for the first nine months of 1997 compared with
1998 indicate a 26% drop in auto thefts. The number of reported auto thefts dropped from 192 to
143 during that time period. Although these are very promising results, we believe that this
aggressive, proactive endeavor will maintain a hi -her level of crime prevention.
Detective Benner has informed me that the majority of vehicles stolen in Brooklyn Center are
recovered within a week. This supports our investigative theory that most vehicles stolen in
Brooklyn Center are taken
for the purpose of short term usage (j'oy riding).
Detective Benner has identified the following areas of focus for the grant application:
1. Target known repeat offenders of auto theft laws.
• 2. Use technology to apprehend thieves.
3. Publicize the efforts of the auto theft detail through public awareness campaigns,
including training sessions for auto dealers.
Memo
December 4, 1998
Page 2
The amount requested in the grant is $58,000. $42,000 is designated to fund overtime costs for
proactive investi-ations and surveillance of criminal activity. The overtime will be worked by
sergeants, detectives, and patrol officers who volunteer for the assignment.
$5,000 is designated for camera equipment. $5,000 for crime prevention including public
education. $5,000 is designated for training officers in auto theft detection. $1,000 is designated
for purchase of information from informants. zn
Attachment: Minnesota Auto Theft Prevention Program Grant Application
•
au'Osmt. mem
ATTACHMENT C
Minnesota Auto Theft Prevention Program
( MATPP )
Grant Application
NOTE This "Attachment C" form should be used if possible. If duplicated, no
change in format will be accepted (no deletions or portions of or rearrangements)
SECTION l : APPLICANT INFORMATION
Type of Governmental Agency or Organization:
State ❑ County ❑ City 0 Private Non - Profit ❑ Private for Profit ❑
Name of Agency or
Organization: Citv of Brooklvn Cent - er Pal i ca nPpt _
Agency Address:
h�fll �hin(Tla ('rAak 7) 1rVJ17
City: Brooklyn Center County: Hennepin State: MN Zip: 55430
• Federal Identiftca tt
on Number:. Total MATPP Budget Request:
$58,000
Project Title, if applicable:
Auto Theft Repeat Offender identification Program
Geographical Area Applicable to Grant Project: (identify statewide, county, city or other)
Brooklvn Center —city
Other Agencies Sharing the Grant Funds and Participating in the Project: (If a multi - agency
project, attach letters of confirmation by all entities).
NOT : Each agency /participant listed, must provide a city /county or Board resolution before
an executed grant can be issued.
•
Form AT:01
Rev. 11/98 _1_
i
'Section 2: Certification /Signatures - I acknowledge that I have read, understand and agree
to the conditions set forth in the application and supporting materials and that the
information I am supplying in this application is true, complete and correct.
Type Name and Title of Project Director: (Project Director is the primary contact person for
all aspects of the grant) "Please Print"
Detective Kevin Benner J
(NAME) (SI GNA T URE) (DA TE)
I
( 612) 569 -3368 (612) 561 -0717
Telephone Number (Director's) Fax Number (Director's)
Type Name and Title of Financial Officer: "Please Print"
W harlie Hansen
(SI GNA T URE) (DA TE)
(NAME) Phone: (612 ) 569 -3345
Type Name and Title of Authority Official: "Please Print"
(Person authorized to enter into a formal agreement
Michael McCauley
(SIGNATURE) (DATE)
(NAME) Phone :(612 )569 -3309
Form AT:0
1
-2-
Section 3. Current and Proposed Auto Tlieft Prevention Responsibilities - For each of the auto theft
reduction strategies and activities listed below, check whether they are current efforts undertaken by your
agency. Then check the activities and strategies that are proposed for MATPP grant - funding. Check all activities
and strategies that apply.
STRATEGIES AND CURRENT LEVEL OF EFFORT PROPOSED FOR
ACTIVITIES (NOT MATPP FUNDED) (MATPP GRANT)
MULTI - AGENCY INVOLVEMENT
Multiple Law Enforcement
Agencies
Prosecutors
Insurance Industry X
Businesses x
Community Groups
Other
Pro- Active Efforts
Decoy Operations X
Chop Shop Identification
Investigations, Long Term x x
Investigations, Short Term x X
Other
• Crifne Analvsis
Identify Trends & Methods X
Develop Profiles X
Identify High Risk Areas X
& Vehicles
Identify Repeat Offenders X X
Other Identify Associates of x
Known offenders
Public Education R Awareness
Prevention Seminars X
Presentations to Schools
Advertising Campaigns
Other PSA through local x
Media.
Training
Development Programs
Law Enforcement Officers x X
Prosecutors
. Other
Form AT-01 -3-
SECTION 4. Grant Purpose and Description - Provide a summary description of the
project that is to be funded by the MATPP. Briefly describe the grant objectives and the
grant- funded strategies and activities that will be implemented to achieve the objectives.
escribe how the project meets priorities established by the MATPP , if applicable. Use
additional space if needed.
Brooklyn Center is a first ring suburb adjacent to the City of Minneapolis. Brooklyn Center's
commercial development includes six auto dealers,numerous movie theaters, restaurants, and a
regional shopping center. These locations, along with numerous apartment complexes, have been
attractive to auto thieves. Statistical data shows that approximately 200 vehicles are stolen each
year in the City of Brooklyn Center and that Brooklyn Center is one of the smaller cities in
population in the area. Brooklyn Center historically ranks in the top ten cities in the state of
Minnesota for the number of vehicles stolen.
Our project is to gather additional intelligence on known auto thieves and associated groups
formed in the Brooklyn Center area. Current data confirms that most of the vehicles stolen in
Brooklyn Center are stolen by repeat offenders. The information collected will include the times
most probable for the suspect(s) to strike and types of vehicles favored. When this intelligence
supports a high probability of a suspect committing a new crime, a team of three to four officers
will immediately set up surveillance at the suspect(s) known addresses.
The team will monitor through surveillance the activity of the target(s) and will conduct video
surveillance in attempts at catching them committing their next crime.
The intelligence information gathered will be entered into the LOGIS(Local Government
Information Systems) database which is shared by Crystal, Eagan, Golden Valley, Hutchinson,
M1nnetonka,Maple Grove, New Hope, Plymouth, Richfield, Robbinsdale, and St. Louis Park.
Objective/Strategies:
1)Being able to target repeat offender groups immediately after gathered intelligence supports
risks of reoffending.
2)Partner with neighboring agencies with the LOGIS network of intelligence focusing on transient
auto theft groups.
3)Share gathered intelligence information with probation departments to insure conditions of the
suspect(s) release are kept.
4)Continued citizen and officer awareness in auto theft prevention.
5)Cable television appearances will be scheduled in order to inform the general public of the
apprehensions made during the project.
With this project the City of Brooklyn Center intends to reduce auto theft by 20% by June 1,2000
in Brooklyn Center, by identifying repeat auto theft offenders and reducing their effects on auto
Form AT:01 -4-
theft. This to include the use of a bait vehicle and both manned and unmanned surveillance units.
The information gathered on the repeat offenders will be shared with the metro agencies and will
benefit the investigative efforts of those agencies.
We have already formed a partnership with two of the auto dealers in our city where they have
allowed us to use , one (or more ) of their cars as a "bait" car. We have also received from
Progressive Insurance the use of one GPS tracking system for the installation in the bait car.
Agents from Progressive Insurance have also offered additional GPS units if needed. We plan to
continue to maintain these partnerships and expand beyond these resources in the future for
additional projects. These partnerships have allowed us to focus the majority of our financial
resources on manpower for targeted area saturation.
As of July 1998, our department has also funded additional monies to help support the Auto Theft
Projects. This includes $7,000 in overtime for direct assignment to the last applied for project.
(July 1997 -Jul de provided the monies directly responsible for the In
Y 1998. ) The department also P
Kind expenses to include the increase in individual radio dispatch and clerical support.
Section 5. - Statement of Need and Current Staff
Part A. Describe the specific problem or deficiency that is to be corrected.
Document the need by providing the source of the statistical data, and include
both numbers and percentages. Statistical data should correspond to the
geographical project area described in Section 1. Do not exceed the space
provided.
Auto Theft statistical data for the City of Brooklyn Center
1996 1997 1998
215 250 Projected 218
Part B. List current staff (not MATPP funded) that have auto theft
responsibilities in your agency. Include the position title, full -time salary, and
percent of time spent on auto theft responsibilities.
Det. Kevin Benner 600 of salary — $49,982 annual
Form AT:01 -�-
Section Measurable Objectives. Activitie /StryE ies and Evaluation Criteria - List the
measurable objectives for the grant program, specifically describing what is to be improved, by how much
and by what date? For each objective listed, describe the grant- supported activities /strategies that
will be carried out to achieve the objective including numbers and time frames as appropriate, i.e.,
what is to be done, how many times, and when. Under evaluation criteria, describe what data or methods
will be used to determine whether the objectives have been met. Use as many sheets as necessary.
MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES CRITERIA ACTIVITIES /STRATEGIES EVALUATION
I
Objective 1- By Sept 1, 1999 increase Review of arrest reports and suspect Have specific targets for project of at
intelligence on repeat auto theft reports on known auto thieves. Entering least 10 known suspects of those
offenders. This information into the Logis databank most likely to re- offend.
for controlled access by neighboring agencies.
Objective 2- By July 1, 2000 reduce Using the intelligence reports, the targets will Compare statistical data from July 1,
auto theft by 20% in Brooklyn be known and a surveillance/ apprehension 1998 to July 1,1999 with the
Center. team will be deployed. following 12 to determine the level of
Reduction.
Objective 3 -To increase the general We currently have 2 full time crime prevention Media reports following the
publics awareness regarding the scope officers which could initiate both awareness successful apprehension of target
of the auto theft problem and provide of the HEAT program and Crime Stoppers groups through any of the prevention
prevention strategies. relating to auto theft. programs.
Also, focus prevention promotions at point of Local media reports on the auto theft
Sale locations through scheduled meeting of = initiative of Brooklyn Center with the
related businesses representatives. Grant aid.
SEC71010 - BUDGET WORKSHEET 0
MINNESOTA I A AU TO THEFT PREVENTION PREVENTION PROGRAM - GRANT APPLICATION
- BUDGET CATEGORIES
BUDGET I'T'EM PROPOSED BUDGET NARRATIVE
EXPENDITURE
I)Funding $42,000 Proactive investigation, surveillance of criminal activity, and undercover operations
1000 hrs/OT
2 Cameraequipment $5,000 (2 )Sony TRV 85Low light Hi 8mm video camera w /car adapter,(2) spare batteries, (1) tripod for car
mount.
(2 )low light cameras for install in "bait" vehicles,(2) VCRs, (2) audio records,( 2) infra red light sources
for the inside of the "bait" car, a case of (50) VHS tapes and a case of (50) 8mm tapes. WA
3)Cash $1,000 For the purchase of information from informants
4 Crime p revention $5,000 Training point of sale businesses and rental car businesses in prevention techniques. Also Brookdale mall
Security personnel in auto theft deterrent strategies.
5 Officer Training $5,000 Training of officers in the undercover surveillance operations and the advanced auto theft detection.
Also the training regarding the newest techniques in "bait" vehicle usage and prosecution concerns. y
City Council Agenda Item No. 7a
1
•
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 7, 1998
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Diane Spector, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: 1999 -2003 Capital Improvement Program
Presented for public hearing and Council review and consideration is the 1999 -2003 Capital
Improvement Program. This CIP includes all capital projects to be undertaken by the City except
some projects at the EBHC, which are detailed in a separate CIP.
This report is essentially the same as reviewed in draft form by the Council in November, except
for the following changes:
1) A section in the Introduction has been added which relates the proposed projects to the
Council's 1999 goals;
2) A subsection on the Golf Course was added to the section on park improvements;
3) The $2.5 million state grant- supported parking lot and building improvements at the
EBHC have been added to the Government Buildings section as those improvements are
being accounted for in and the cash flow is through the Capital Improvements Fund; and
4) Various minor clarifications and updates have been made.
Significant differences between the 1998 -2002 CIP and the 1999 -2003 CIP include:
Water:
The Water System Analysis by an outside consultant has been completed, and confirms
staff's analysis that no additional wells, storage, or major distribution improvements are
considered necessary at this time.
A water utility fund contribution towards the construction of an additional cold storage
building at the Central Garage has been postponed. Further space needs analysis must be
conducted before a recommendation can be made on the addition of this building the
Central Garage campus.
Neighborhood construction projects have been reestimated, and adjustments made to
corresponding water utility costs.
Sanitary Sewer:
® A better estimate of the cost of armoring the Mississippi River bank adjacent to the
Mississippi River interceptor at 66th Avenue has been made.
A sanitary sewer utility fund contribution towards the construction of an additional cold
storage building at the Central Garage has been postponed. Further space needs analysis
must be conducted before a recommendation can be made on the addition of this building
the Central Garage campus.
Neighborhood construction projects have been reestimated, and adjustments made to
corresponding sanitary sewer utility costs.
Storm Drainage Utility:
The "phase II" study of the City's storm drainage system is being finalized, and the
capital projects identified in that plan will be available to incorporate into next years' CIP
and rate study. However, one specific recommended improvement has been included in
this CIP, that is the detailed study of the Palmer Lake basin and the first phase of
expected improvements.
Neighborhood construction projects have been reestimated, and adjustments made to
corresponding storm drainage utility costs.
Sidewalks /Trails:
The 53rd Avenue Greenway Trail has been added to the CIP, funded $50,000 from local
State Aid and $50,000 from a DNR trail grant. A future project to rehab /raise Shingle
Creek trails was identified in last years' CIP and is not shown in this years', awaiting the
results of the Palmer Lake basin study.
Parks:
Park improvements have been revised ro reflect some changing priorities and also to
better reflect actual costs.
Public Buildings:
Construction of the public safety and fire station improvements has been shown in the
years expenditures are anticipated. Also, the rehabilitation of City Hall and the
Community Center has been put back to 2000 to provide ample time for community input
and planning. Parking lot rehabilitation is still shown in 1999, and may be constructed in
Fall, 1999 if feasible. The proposed 2000 project to provide additional cold storage at
the Central Garage has been pushed back to at least 2004 to provide additional time for
study. The $2.5 million EBHC improvements are shown. On the equipment side, radio
system improvements were pushed back to 2001; the actual date of replacement is still
very much up in the air. And $125,000 in additional technology for the new police
is building, for phone and computer extensions which were not included in the original
building plan, has been identified.
• Streets:
Two State Aid street projects, France Avenue from 50th to 52nd, and 53rd from France
Avenue to 55th, have been replaced with a State Aid project to improve 73rd Avenue
from Humboldt to TH 252 in 2001. A project to paint the 69th Avenue fence was added.
On neighborhood projects, the small area of Halifax/Grimes/France north of 63rd was
added to the Garden City Central project area. The small neighborhood west of Northport
Park was added to 2002. The "Tangletown" area was expanded and moved to 2003.
Neighborhood construction projects have been reestimated, and adjustments made to
corresponding special assessments, local and regular state aid, and special assessment
construction fund costs.
In general expenditures, budget figures, and projections are made more parallel to the budget and
to the annual financial report. For example, in the past, no matter the size or phasing of a project,
it was almost always shown in the CIP in one year. Now, now only expenditures but also budget
may be shown over multiple years. This is also reflected in the separate budget documents. A
neighborhood street project with multiple sources of funds will show up in multiple places in the
budget: the utility components in the respective utility budgets (and rate studies), state aid
component in that budget, and assessments and general fund contribution in the special
assessment construction fund budget. Expenditures will also be coded in that manner. The goal
is to have all financial documents "match" as closely as possible.
® Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1999 -2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, a Capital Improvement Program has been prepared for the period 1999 -
2003, detailing proposed capital projects and funding sources; and
WHEREAS, there has been opportunity for public review and input on said plan, and
a public hearing has been conducted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that the 1999 -2003 Capital Improvement Program is hereby approved
and adopted.
•
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
I
C APITAL
I
IMPROVEMENT
I
PROGRAM
- 1999 -2003
TTT
Street Improvements Government Buildings
Park Improvements Public Utility Improvements
I
I
City U, f
I
-- Brooklyn Center
I
1999 -2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
Introduction 1
Public Utilities
' Water Utility ................ ............................... 11
Sanitary Sewer Utility 14
Storm Drainage Utility ............ ............................... 16
Streets, Sidewalks, and Trail's
Streets 18
Sidewalks and Trails ............. ............................... 21
' Parks, Public Facilities, and Capital Equipment
Parks 23
Centerbrook Golf Course .......... ............................... 26
Government Buildings ............ ............................... 27
' Miscellaneous Equipment .......... ............................... 28
' TABLES
Table l: Summary By Functional Area .. ............................... 5
Table 2: Summary By Fund ......... ............................... 7
Table 3: 1999 Projects ............. ............................... 9
' Table 4: Summary By Function and Fund .............................. 10
Table 5: Water Utility Projected 5 Year Balance .......................... 12
Table 6: Water Utility Facilities Future Maintenance or Replacement Needs ........ 13
Table 7: Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund Projected 5 Year Balance ................ 15
Table 8: Sanitary Sewer Utility Facilities Future Maintenance or Replacement Needs .. 15
Table 9: Storm Drainage Utility 5 Year Projected Balance .................... 17
Table 10: Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Program Progress 19
Table 11: Municipal State Aid Fund 5 Year Projected Balance ................. 20
Table 12: General Fund Contributions to Street Projects 5 Year Projected Balance .... 20
Table 13: Local State Aid Fund 5 Year Projected Balance ................ 22
Table 14: Parks Facilities Future Maintenance or Replacement Needs .. .. . 25
Table 15: Golf Course Fund 5 Year Projected Balance ...................... 26
' Table 16: Capital Improvement Fund 5 Year Projected Balance ................ 29
FIGURES
Figure l: By Functional Area ....................................... 6
Figure 2: By Funding Source . . .. .. 8
APPENDIX
Table A: Water Utility ............ ............................... Al
Map A: Water Facilities ..... ............................... A2
' Table B: Sanitary Sewer Utility ........... A3
Map B: Sewer Facilities ....... ..... . ............. A4
Table C: Storm Drainage Utility ..... ............................... A5
Map C: Drainage Facilities .... .............................. A6
Table D: Sidewalk and Trail Improvements . A7
Map D: Sidewalk & Trail Facilities ............................. A8
Table E: Park Improvements ....................................... A9
....................
Map E: Park Facilities All
Table F: Public Buildings Improvements .............................. Al2
Map F: Public Buildings .... ............................... A13
Table G: Street Improvements ...... ............................... A14
Map G: Street Improvement Projects ........................... A19
■ 1999 -2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
■
INTRODUCTION
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a planning document. It is intended to serve as a summary
' of the physical improvements proposed to carry out the City's strategic and comprehensive plans. The
CIP presents a schedule of improvements and an evaluation of the community's financial capabilities,
as well as its goals and priorities. In such a way, the community can be assured that it is adequately
prepared to meet the demands on its financial resources in the coming years.
No document or planning process, however, can anticipate all contingencies or opportunities.
' Certainly not all of the capital improvements to be undertaken during this time period are known at this
time. Rather, the information contained in these tables represents a best estimate of improvements and
their costs based on present knowledge and expected conditions. The CIP is a flexible planning tool that
' provides a means to determine which projects are of highest priority. The City can be responsive to
opportunities because it has available a comprehensive listing of its needs which can be evaluated and
reprioritized if necessary to take into account new or changing situations.
t For the purposes of this report, a capital improvement can be defined as any major non - recurring
expenditure or any expenditure for physical facilities of government. Typical expenditures are the cost
of land acquisition or interest in land; construction of buildings or other structures; construction of
1 roads, utilities, or park improvements; and pursuit of community development activities. Most capital
improvements are typically funded from revenue sources other than the general fund. Maintenance of
these improvements is primarily funded by the general fund.
The CIP is directly linked to the goals and policies, land use and community facility sections of the
Comprehensive Plan, since these sections indicate general policies of development, redevelopment, and
the maintenance of the community. Consequently, the primary objective of the CIP is to integrate the
specific goals, policies, and recommendations contained in the City's plan with its capability to pay for
and maintain capital improvements.
Meeting Strategic and Annual Goals
The City's Comprehensive Plan presents the framework for programming, development and
redevelopment within the community. This Comprehensive Plan identifies several general community
goals.
► Carve out a unique and desirable niche in the Twin Cities are by capitalizing on physical
attributes such as: location, highway and bus access; sound and diversified housing stock;
vibrant mixed -use center; attractive Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor; and interconnected park and
open space system.
Proiects consistent with this coal are:
► Completion of park upgrades including playground equipment replacement, shelter renovations
and replacement, and addition of amenities and linkages to regional parks.
► City participation in a Hennepin County street improvement project providing a major upgrade
to Brooklyn Boulevard, improving safety, increasing capacity, and coordinating with
redevelopment and enhancement projects.
a
' ► Gain an increased sense of unity and place by: retrofitting the public elements of the
neighborhoods; focusing and linking these neighborhoods toward an intensified, mixed use
retail- office - residential -civic core; making major street corridors and other public spaces highly
attractive; and celebrating diversity.
Projects consistent with this goal are:
The continuation of a systematic program of neighborhood street and utility
improvement projects designed to upgrade neighborhood infrastructure and improve the
appearance of Brooklyn Center neighborhoods;
► Landscaping and enhancement projects on Brooklyn Boulevard and the three loops:
commercial, neighborhood, and park, as well as rehabilitation of streetscaping in the
' Earle Brown commercial area; and
► A focus on the redevelopment of mature commercial sites by assisting in the
' construction of infrastructure improvements, such as regional storm water ponds.
► Develop a positive public image and strong community esteem.
Projects consistent with this coal are:
► Construction of new public facilities and rehabilitation of existing facilities to provide
' attractive and functional places for community gatherings.
► Provide cooperative leadership and sound management.
Projects consistent with this goal are:
► Continued maintenance and repair of the City's infrastructure, such as: painting and
repairing well houses and water towers, rehabilitating sanitary sewer lift stations;
repairing storm sewer outfalls; repairing sidewalks and retaining walls; sealcoating
streets and trails; and replacing and expanding lighting at city parks.
These major projects focus on maintaining a high quality of life and neighborhood focus and on
redeveloping the community. The program provides for the continuation of the high level of public
services which Brooklyn Center has come to expect and to enjoy.
Projects in this CIP are also consistent with the City Council's 1999 Goals. These include:
' Goal 1: Support Brookdale Redevelopment
Projects consistent with the goal are:
' Completion of the Shingle Creek Regional Pond project to provide off-site storm water
detention and treatment for the Brookdale Shopping Center and surrounding
commercial area.
' City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 2
' Goal 2: Continue and Improve Code Enforcement and Compliance Activities
Projects consistent with the goal are:
' The neighborhood street and utility improvement projects designed to upgrade
neighborhood infrastructure and improve the appearance of Brooklyn Center
neighborhoods generate a side benefit as residents in project areas often take that
' project as an opportunity to replace roofs, siding, landscaping, fencing, driveways,
etc., and conduct a general cleanup of the area.
Goal 3: Increase Proactivity Towards Fighting Crime
' Projects consistent with the coal are:
► Replacing park facilities and equipment and adding new recreational opportunities in
the parks should increase their use. Active use of the parks for fun and leisure
activities discourages criminal activity.
Goal 4: Finish Fire and Police Building Construction
Projects consistent with the goal are:
► Completion of these projects is reflected in this CIP, with adequate funds identified.
Goal 5: Evaluate Housing Programs and Policies
Projects consistent with the goal are:
► No specific projects are included in this CIP.
Goal 6: Plan for Needed Work at Community Center and City Hall
' Projects consistent with the goal are:
► Projects and funding have been identified for projects improving City Hall and the
Community Center, as well as several projects relating to the Civic Center grounds
such as parking lot rehabilitation and Plaza improvements.
Goal 7: Create Neighborhood Traffic Safety Plan
' Projects consistent with the goal are:
► The continuation of a systematic program of neighborhood street and utility
improvement projects designed to upgrade neighborhood infrastructure provides an
opportunity to collect information, educate residents, and implement solutions.
Goal 8: Continue and Improve Long -term Financial Planning
Projects consistent with the goal are:
► The CIP continues to refine long -term planning. The 1999 -2003 report includes for the
first time a detailed review of the Golf Course Fund.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 3
The Plan
The detailed tables of ro osed improvement projects are organized b functional area -- for example:
A P P P J g Y
water system improvements, park upgrades, street projects, etc. The CIP begins with a series of
' summary tables and graphs showing the overall level of expected need and funding requirements. A
summary of the proposed capital improvements by functional area for the five year period of 1999
through 2003 is shown in Table 1. A summary by funding source is shown in Table 2. Table 3 shows
' the projects proposed for consideration in 1999. All costs shown are best estimate of future costs based
on 1998 estimated costs.
' It must be understood that the scheduling of various improvements, especially those that are related to
development or redevelopment, can change substantially from year to year. However, the overall level
of improvements shown in this CIP represents the best judgment of what is necessary to maintain
' infrastructure in good condition, and to provide those facilities which are necessary to support public
services through the year 2003.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 4
TABLE 1 - Capital Improvement Program - Summary by Functional Area
........................... .......
08-Dec-98
:....:::......... ..... ........................ :::::::::::::: 9 9 ....:.....:.................... #i�?F ...::.:.:::::..:::::2R; 1:::::.::...................... ............:.:.:.::,:.::..:::: ..................
...
PUBLIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS:
Water Utility Capital Projects 283,824 1,210,510 423,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
Sanitary Sewer Utility Capital Projects 42,360 200,000 500,000 0 0 0 150,000
Storm Drainage Utility Capital Projects 76,022 980,344 1,830,000 50,000 250,000 50,000 50,000
SUBTOTAL $402,206 $2,390,854 $2,753,000 $75,000 $275,000 $75,000 $225,000
SIDEWALK/TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS:
Off- Street Trails 0 25,000 160,000 0 0 0 0
Sidewalks 24,184 87,425 75,000 0 25,000 0 25,000
SUBTOTAL $24,184 $112,425 $235,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000
PARK IMPROVEMENTS $38,796 $226,000 $238,800 $229,600 $237,000 $278,000 $357,400
PUBLIC BUILDINGS $440,348 $4,565,118 $7,193,900 $2,000,000 $600,000 $0 $0
STREET IMPROVEMENTS:
Signals 0 14,000 25,000 0 0 0 0
State Aid Street Projects 700,826 307,809 1,197,166 1,899,550 852,000 0 0
Neighborhood Street Projects 3,661,449 2,854,085 2,989,200 3,809,700 2,982,240 5,065,050 3,719,880
Commercial Street Projects 0 377,145 100,000 0 0 0 0
Landscaping 0 0 25,000 175,000 0 250,000 0
SUBTOTAL $4,362,275 $3,553,040 $4,336,366 $5,884,250 $3,834,240 $5,315,050 $3,719,880
GRAND TOTAL $5,267,809 $10,847,437 $14,757,066 $8,188,850 $4,971,240 $5,668,050 $4,327,280
v.
City of Brooklyn Center
Capital Improvement Program, 1999 -2003
By Functional Area
Water Sanitary Sewer
4% 1%
Storm Drainage
Other Street 7%
Improvements Parks
44% 3%
I
Public Buildings
30%
State Aid Streets Trails & Sidewalks
10% 1%
Total 5 Year Proposed Expenditures = $49,700,453
ON
TABLE 2 - Capital Improvement Program - Summary by Fund
= »:::<: < :2fti72 > >
: .;:.998.;.;;;;;;;:.;.;:.;;. >;:: ::.::::::::::'1.999............ _ ........................:._..:............... ........................:::::::
03-Dec-98 .:::::'....................:...........:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. :::::::::.::::::::::::::...:::. :::::::.:...:...........,......................,............................. ................._.............
WATER UTILITY $1,384,429 $1,205,992 $803,700 $794,185 $647,945 $706,825 $620,180
SANITARY SEWER UTILITY $709,868 $681,240 $1,003,270 $585,860 $533,480 $681,825 $745,180
STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY $246,417 $347,211 $502,945 $752,185 $622,645 $945,604 $575,280
MSA- REGULAR $385,104 $377,443 $707,816 $289,080 $232,320 $743,460 $0
MSA - LOCAL ACCOUNT ($36,533) $74,966 $778,800 $854,250 $23,040 $100,000 $75,000
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $1,531,615 $1,296,284 $1,243,340 $1,557,445 $1,025,415 $1,296,634 $1,098,195
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND $198,044 $2,545,118 ($449,200) $2,222,600 $829,000 $233,000 $347,400
GENERAL FUND: STREET CONSTR $517,929 $453,596 $809,495 $433,845 $549,395 $665,702 $856,045
GOLF COURSE FUND $0 $11,000 $13,000 $7,000 $8,000 $45,000 $10,000
LIQUOR STORE FUND $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TIF FUNDS $0 $500,000 $0 $442,400 $250,000 $250,000 $0
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS $281,100 $2,250,000 $5,368,900 $0 $0 $0 $0
OTHER GOVERNMENTS /FUNDS $49,836 $1,104,587 $3,975,000 $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0
GRAND TOTAL $5,267,809 $10,847,437 $14,757,066 $8,188,850 $4,971,240 $5,668,050 $4,327,280
■r r ■r ra rr r� r r rr �r rre r rr r r rr r rr r�
City of Brooklyn Center
Capital Improvement Program, 1999 -2003
By Funding Source
Storm Drainage Special
Sanitary Sewer Utility Assessments
Utility 7% 16%
8%
Water Utility
11% GO Bonds
Golf Course Fund 16%
MSA Regular
6%
MSA Local
4% Other Funds
General Fund Capital 14%
7% Improvements Fund Other Funds Includes State
11 % Grants, ISTEA, etc.
Total 5 Year Proposed Expenditures = $49,700,453
Go
TABLE 3 - Capital Improvement Program - 1999 Projects
<: >:: »:�uf[c# ::. .:..::::::;�thec:•:::::::::::: �treet.:::::....1.�... mites.::::.... N!S/ti .:.::.:............::::::..................:::.:..................r Y...................................... .9................:.:::.::::::.
`rorttll_:::.:vvts/Fid Asssmn::: lunii:: ;:(gyl.r......:..t�al..,, ......,tJUI�IY.: � praiiEars:'ssessmer+t::::,,.t4
Water
Wellhouse #5 & 6 exterior rehab 160,000 $160,000
Wellhouse #7 interior rehab 13,000 $13,000
Routine well maintenance 50,000 $50,000
Paint tower 41 200,000 $200,000
Sanitary Sewer
Replace lift stn #10 &11 & 300,000 $300,000
forcemain $0
Stabilize Miss River Interceptor 200,000 $200,000
Storm Drainage $0
Misc storm structure impr 50,000 $50,000
Shingle Creek Regional Pond 1,750,000 $1,750,000
Palmer Lake drainage design 30,000 $30,000
Sidewalks & Trails
Misc park trails 60,000 $60,000
53rd Avenue greenway trail 50,000 50,000 $100,000
Misc sidewalk repairs 50,000 $50,000
Repair retaining walls 25,000 $25,000
Parks
Bellvue 20,000 $20,000
Central 90,000 $90,000
Centerbrook 13,000 $13,000
Grandview 3,800 $3,800
Kylawn 3,800 $3,800
Lions 30,200 $30,200
Northport 22,800 $22,800
E Palmer 6,500 $6,500
W Palmer 3,800 $3,800
Wangstad 26,400 $26,400
Willow Lane 18,500 $18,500
Public Buildings
New police station 2,958,720 $2,958,720
Additional public safety tech 125,000 $125,000
Civic Center parking lots 200,000 $200,000
EBHC bldg & parking lot 1,500,000 $1,500,000
Remodel E fire station 712,290 $712,290
New W fire station 1,697,890 $1,697,890
Streets
Signal painting & restoration 25,000 $25,000
Previous years' projects 437,166 $437,166
Earle Brown Drive 189,000 139,200 (106,200) 13,000 13,000 12,000 $260,000
Brooklyn Boulevard ROW 600,000 $600,000
SE neighborhood 809,495 795,440 131,450 50,000 367,700 490,270 85,945 258,900 $2,989,200
Paint 69th parkway fence 25,000 $25,000
GRAND TOTALI $809,495 I $3,313,000 ( $984,440 `$5,919,700 I $707,816 I $778,800 1 $803,700 $1,003,270 I $177,945 I $258,900 I $14,757,066
� I
M �AB�4 -Mit c -�
prRRm'rd"m �imr y B"unc� �
ar utW
<>
::::::.......I ........................�
.... ........:.::..:::... ... h.......................... ...............................
08-Dec-98 :::: ' ��17::::::..::::::. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::........,.:...................................................... ...............................
PUBLIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS:
Water Utility 283,824 1,210,510 423,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
Sanitary Sewer Utility 42,360 200,000 500,000 0 0 0
Storm Drainage Utility 26,186 (359,656) 405,000 50,000 250,000 50,000
TIF /Other Govts /Capital Improvements Fund 49,836 1,340,000 1,425,000 0 0 0
SUBTOTAL $402,206 $2,390,854 $2,753,000 $75,000 $275,000 $75,000
SIDEWALK/TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS:
TRAILS
Local State Aid 0 25,000 110,000 0 0 0
Trail grant 50,000
SIDEWALKS
Local State Aid 24,184 87,425 75,000 0 25,000 0
SUBTOTAL $24,184 $112,425 $235,000 $0 $25,000 $0
PARKIMPROVEMENTS
Capital Projects Fund 38,796 215,000 225,800 222,600 229,000 233,000
Golf Course Fund 0 11,000 13,000 7,000 8,000 45,000
SUBTOTAL $38,796 $226,000 $238,800 $229,600 $237,000 $278,000
,PUBLIC BUILDINGS
Capital Improvements Fund 159,248 2,315,118 (675,000) 2,000,000 600,000 0
Water Utility 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sanitary Sewer Utility 0 0 0 0 0 0
Liquor Fund 0 0 2,500,000 0 0 0
GO Bonds 281,100 2,250,000 5,368,900 0 0 0
SUBTOTAL $440,348 $4,565,118 $7,193,900 $2,000,000 $600,000 $0
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
MSA - Regular 385,104 377,443 707,816 289,080 232,320 743,460
MSA - Local (60,717) (37,459) 593,800 854,250 (1,960) 100,000
Water Utility 1,100,605 275,069 380,700 769,185 622,945 681,825
Sanitary Sewer Utility 667,508 481,240 503,270 - 585,860 533,480 681,825
Storm Drainage Utility 220,231 706,867 97,945 702,185 372,645 895,604
Special Assessments 1,531,615 1,296,284 1,243,340 1,557,445 1,025,415 1,296,634
Special Assessment Constr Fund 517,929 453,596 809,495 433,845 549,395 665,702
TIF Revenue 0 0 0 442,400 250,000 250,000
Other Governments 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 0
SUBTOTAL $4,362,275 $3,553,040 $4,336,366 $5,884,250 $3,834,240 $5,315,050
GRAND TOTAL $5,267,809 $10,847,437 $14,757,066 ` $8,188,850 $4,971,240 $5,668,050
I
' 1. PUBLIC UTILITIES
a. Water Utility
The City's water utility provides service to 8,900 connections in Brooklyn Center. The City also has
cooperative agreements with the adjacent cities of Brooklyn Park and Robbinsdale to provide service to
about 100 border customers in those cities where Brooklyn Center has mains but those cities do not.
About 12 homes in Brooklyn Center receive their water from the City of Minneapolis.
The water utility finances all costs for water supply, distribution, operations and maintenance, and
capital improvements. Revenues are generated through water use charges, connection charges, and
special assessments. Charges are adjusted annually based on a rate study analysis which reviews
operations, maintenance, and construction costs and projected water demand.
Substantial cash expenditures have been made from the water utility in the past few years. These
expenditures are primarily cyclical in nature, such as painting and repairs to the three water towers and
replacement of the SCADA system. In 1999, this cycle of larger scale improvements will be
completed, and It will be several years before Items such as tower repainting come up again. The only
' significant annual expenditures during the "off cycle" years are associated with neighborhood street
projects. In most cases, these represent repairs to the system, rather than substantial replacements.
However, in 1997, the utility replaced over 5 miles of water main in the Orchard West neighborhood,
which historically has had water quality problems and maintenance issues. There are a few other
neighborhoods which are known to have "hot" or corrosive soils where substantial replacements are
likely to be required. The Garden City neighborhood projects are likely to encounter these conditions,
as well as improvements in the "Tangletown" area of the southeast neighborhood.
As a result of these large capital expenditures, the balance in the fund has been reduced considerably.
The target balance in this fund is $1.5 million, and projects and utility rates have been identified which
' would sustain that balance.
5 Year Improvements
Short term activities relate primarily to routine maintenance, and improvements associated with
' Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Program.
1. Continue the routine well inspection and maintenance program to assure the continued
functioning of the existing wells.
2. Repair the interior and exterior coatings and provide for structural repair of the water towers.
' Tower #2 was completed in 1997 and Tower #3 in 1998, with Tower #1 scheduled in 1999.
3. Rehabilitate the exterior of the older well houses, especially those located in residential
neighborhoods, and make necessary repairs such as replacement of doors, roofs, etc.
4. Replace existing mains as necessary and make various water distribution system improvements
to assure the system's ability to deliver needed capacities to all portions of the City during peak
' demand periods and for fire protection as a part of the Neighborhood Street and Utility
Improvement Program.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 11
Table 5
WATER UTILITY FUND PROJECTED 5 YEAR BALANCE
' Starting $3,287,865 $2,702,106 $2,444,168 $2,169,192 $2,037,837 $1,851,418
Balance
Revenues
Investment interest $190,696 $148,616 $122,208 $108,460 $101,892 $92,571
User fees 1,068,000 1,092,000 1,116,000 1,152,000 1,188,000 1,212,000
Other 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000
Exaenditures
' Capital outlays $1,205,992 $803,700 $794,185 $647,945 $706,825 $620,180
SCADA replacement 270,000
Wellhouse rehabilitation 17,675 173,000
' Routine well maintenance 12,240 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
Tower painting /repair 544,820 200,000
Street improvements 275,069 380,700 769,185 622,945 681,825 595,180
e NSP Reimbursement (279,587)
Other (bldg projects) 365,775
Debt service 0 0 0 0 0 0
Operating costs $748,463 $804,854 $829,000 $853,870 $879,486 $905,870
Ending $2,702,106 $2,444,168 $2,169,192 $2,037,837 $1,851,418 $1,739,939
Balance
Long -term Improvements
Long -term improvements require detailed evaluation of capacity following the extensive distribution
system improvements constructed in the past several years, and future water quality regulations.
1. In 1998, the periodic Water System Analysis study last conducted in 1989 ( "The Black
' and Veatch study ") was updated. The study concludes that Brooklyn Center's water
supply system is adequate, and that no new wells or elevated storage need to be
constructed. The emergency water interconnect with Brooklyn Park which was
constructed in 1997 is capable of supplying all the City's average day demand should
that need arise. An emergency generator capable of starting up a well was purchased
in 1998, and electric control modifications were made to several of the wells at the time
the adjustable speed drives were installed to accommodate the generator. Water
modeling confirms that under most emergency scenarios, as long as the integrity of the
distribution system is not breached, water adequate for serving average water needs and
providing fireflow would be available.
r The study also updated the estimated cost of an iron and manganese removal water
treatment plant, should the City desire to construct such a facility. At this time there is
' no regulatory reason to do so, and alternative methods such as chemical treatment have
kept complaints about these naturally- occurring minerals to a minimum. Iron and
manganese are not aesthetically pleasing in the water, but no health hazards have been
identified as a result of their presence. It is estimated that a plant to remove iron and
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 12
' manganese, including an additional 1 MGAL ground storage, would cost between $6.7-
8 million. A suitable site in the City's well field is available, and is reserved for such
a future use, and the water distribution system has been designed to accommodate a
future plant with few adjustments.
2. In 1997 -98, adjustable speed drives were installed on the pumps at several of the City's
primary wells. A revised operations plan to manage energy use and maximize
o
production was Implemented. A final component of the revised operations p lan is to
amend the City's periodic well maintenance program to provide major maintenance
' based on running time rather than every 6 years. This component is still being
developed, and is expected to be implemented in 2000.
3. The following is a listing of major water utility facilities and future major maintenance
or replacement needs:
Table 6
WATER UTILITY FACILITIES FUTURE MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT NEEDS
FACILITY YEAR $TJII.1 5 T'EAIt f LANG TERM
Well #2 (B Blvd) 1959 2004: routine maintenance Routine maintenance every 6 years
' f Well #3 (at Tower #2) 1961 2001: routine maintenance Routine maintenance every 6 years
Well #4 (Evergreen W) 1961 1999: routine maintenance Routine maintenance every 6 years
2002: exterior rehab
Well #5 (70th/Camden) 1966 2002: routine maintenance I Routine maintenance every 6 years
Well #6 (69th/Emerson) 1965 1999: exterior rehab Routine maintenance every 6 years
2000: routine maintenance
i Well #7 (Evergreen E) 1970 1999: exterior rehab Routine maintenance every 6 years
Well #8 (Camden/Woodb) 1977 2000: routine maintenance Routine maintenance every 6 years
1999: exterior rehab
Well #9 (Camden N) 1984 1999: routine maintenance Routine maintenance every 6 years
' I Well #10 (Camden S) 1990 2003: routine maintenance Routine maintenance every 6 years
I Tower #1 (France) 1958 1999: repair coatings Inspect coatings in 2004; rehab in 15 -20
years
I Tower #2 (Dupont) 1960 Inspect coatings in 2004; rehab in 15 -20
years
Tower #3 (Centerbrook) 1973 Inspect coatings in 2004 rehab in 15 -20
years
SCADA 1998 Periodically upgrade, replace when
technologically obsolete
Note: Starting in 1999, rountine maintenance of wells will be scheduled based on running time rather
than every six years. This long term plan will be amended accordingly.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 13
b. Sanitary Sewer Utility
The City's sanitary sewer utility provides service to 8,770 customers in Brooklyn Center. The City
also has cooperative agreements with Brooklyn Park and Robbinsdale to provide service to about 100
border customers in those cities where Brooklyn Center has mains but they do not.
The sanitary sewer utility finances all costs for operations and maintenance and capital improvements
through sewer use charges, connection charges and special assessments. Charges are adjusted annually
based on a rate study analysis which reviews operation, maintenance, and construction costs, as well as
' sewage treatment charges from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (formerly
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission), which provides wastewater treatment for the entire Twin
City metro area. MCES charges account for about 3/4 the annual operating expenditure of the utility.
i Substantial cash expenditures have been made from the sanitary sewer utility in the past few years.
These expenditures are primarily cyclical or one time in nature. In the past several years the utility
' has replaced the two primary lift stations, number 1 in Garden City Park and number 2 on Lyndale
Avenue, and relined or replaced where possible a substantial amount of corrugated metal pipe which
was used for some major interceptors in the late 1950s. In 1999, this cycle of larger scale
improvements will be completed, and it will be several years before items such major replacements
' come up again. Generally, the only significant annual expenditures during the "off cycle" years are
associated with neighborhood street projects, for the replacement of mains as necessary.
As a result of these large capital expenditures, the balance in the fund has been reduced considerably.
The target minimum balance in this fund is $1.0 million. While current projections show the fund
periodically falling below that minimum, project costs are reviewed annually, and adjustments may or
may not need to be made in future years based on more current information.
5 Year Imorovements
Short term activities relate primarily to routine maintenance, and improvements associated with the
' Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Program.
1. Continue routine sewer televising and lift station inspection and maintenance program.
2. Replace any segments of sewer which have been identified as needing replacement by the
television inspection program, and as necessary with the Neighborhood Street and Utility
Improvement Program. It has been determined that almost one -half of the sanitary sewer pipe
in the City is of the ungasketed, clay tile variety. This type of material is highly susceptible to
root and groundwater infiltration. On average about half the sewer pipe in the Neighborhood
projects has had to be replaced because of extensive root infiltration. Many individual services
have also been replaced for the same reason. The projects identified in this 5 year plan are all
in areas with known instances of root infiltration, so it is expected that replacements will be
substantial.
3. Replace two smaller lift stations which are reaching the end of their useful life, and consider
relining an associated segment of force main in 1.999 and another in 2003.
4. Stabilize the river bank around the section of the Mississippi River interceptor that is
' immediately adjacent to the river.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 14
Table 7
SANITARY SEWER UTILITY FUND PROJECTED 5 YEAR BALANCE
Starting $1,167,966 $922,323 $484,620 $538,655 $685,327 $728,387
Balance
Revenues
' Investment interest $67,742 $50,728 $24,231 $26,933 $34,266 $36,419
User fees 2,283,463 2,413,902 2,551,101 2,625,907 2,701,461 2,777,777
Other 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Expenditures
Capital Outlays $681,240 $1,003,270 $585,860 $533,480 $681,825 $745,180
INTRAC replacement 200,000
Replace lifts #10 & 11 300,000 150,000
River line 200,000
Street improvements 481,240 503,270 585,860 533,480 681,825 595,180
Previous years' projects
Operating costs $391,609 $344,562 $ 357,604 $371,173 $385,291 $399,981
MCES charge 1,525,000 1,555,500 1,578,833 1,602,515 1,626,553 1,650,951
Ending $922,323 $484,620 $538,6551 $685,327 $728,387 $747,471
Balance
Lone -Term Improvements
Long term improvements relate specifically to replacement of major facilities. The following is a list of
those facilities and their maintenance or replacement needs.
' Table 8
SANITARY SEWER UTILITY FACILITIES
' FUTURE MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT NEEDS
FACILITY YEAR BUILT 5 YEAR LING TERM
Lift Station #1 (Garden City) 1997 Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
Lift Station #2 (Lyndaie) 1993
' I Lift Station #3 (Palmer Lake) 1982 Maintain & rehab as necessary. Review condition in 2012
Lift Station #4 (Queen & 55th) 1990 Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
1
Lift Station #5 (Indiana & 56th) 1990 Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
Lift Station #6 (France & LakeB) 1988 ( Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
Lift Station #7 (Willow Lane) 1990 Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
Lift Station #10 (58th & June) 1967 1999: replace Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
Lift Station #11 (SCP) 1969 1999: replace Monitor, maintain & rehab as necessary
Lift Station #12 (Freeway) 1985 I Maintain & rehab as necessary. Review condition in 2015
INTRAC 1998 l Periodically upgrade, replace when technologically obsolete
' City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 15
C. Storm Drainage Utility
' The City's storm drainage system consists of storm sewer piping and a series of storm water detention
ponds. The Local Water Management Plan has established a goal of constructing new and /or replacing
old storm sewers plus adding additional storm water ponds to provide adequate drainage for a five year
storm. The Plan also requires private developments to provide on -site drainage system and storage
necessary to treat storm water and retain all drainage on -site for up to six hours after a five year storm.
Substantial capital improvements have been undertaken in the years since the storm drainage utility
fund was established in 1991. Through revenue bonds the fund financed the acquisition of property
and the construction of Bob Cahlander Park, which includes a 4 acre regional storm water detention
and water quality pond. These revenue bonds will be retired in 2005. The first phase of the Shingle
Creek Regional Pond is complete, with the second phase to be constructed in Winter, 1998 -99. This
project is funded by a $2 million grant from the state DTED, TIF, and the City of Minneapolis. The
neighborhood projects which have been undertaken in the past several years have had very substantial
storm drainage components. As a result, the fund has a very low reserve balance. A less aggressive
level of improvement will be pursued until a minimum balance of $500,000 can be maintained. In
' addition, the special assessment component of street improvements will increase so that property
owners are paying a larger share of the cost of installation of new storm sewers.
The storm drainage utility finances all costs for storm drainage system operations and maintenance and
capital improvements. Capital improvement bonds and special assessments supplement the SDU.
Charges are adjusted annually based on a rate study analysis which reviews all costs relating to the
storm drainage system.
5 Year Improvements
Short term activities include both major drainage improvements and improvements associated with the
Neighborhood Street and Utility improvement Program.
1. Complete storm drainage improvements as necessary with the Neighborhood Street and Utility
Improvement Program. Major trunk improvements have been made by several previous
' projects, including 65th Avenue through the Orchard East and West projects; 57th Avenue
from Humboldt to the east; and 55th Avenue through several projects, including the
Logan/James /Knox and Bellvue projects. Trunk storm sewer work in this 5 year plan is
expected on 63rd Avenue from Brooklyn Boulevard to Brooklyn Drive. Some additional
ponding is being explored in several areas of Garden City Park. This ponding would pretreat
stormwater before it is discharged into Shingle Creek.
2. Stud the Palmer Lake basin area including its ability to store and treat runoff. Determine the
Y � g Y
long -term implications for water quality and natural habitat. Refine concepts for increasing
' stormwater storage in the Palmer Lake basin, and construct the first phase of these
improvements.
3. Coordinate with the city of Minneapolis the completion of the Shingle Creek Regional Pond.
As Brookdale Shopping Center redevelops, its utility and drainage plans will have to be
coordinated with the Regional Pond design.
' City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 16
' Table 9
STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY 5 YEAR PROJECTED BALANCE
»>»;
i<2no
.................................... ...............................
„,..
Starting $151,169 $389,221 $482,645 $406,265 $504,504 $334,203
Balance
Revenues
' User fees $936,000 $988,000 $1,040,000 $1,092,000 $1,144,000 $1,196,000
Interest 8,314 17,961 24,132 20,313 25,225 16,710
Other 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
Expenditures
' Capital outlays $317,211 $502,945 $752,185 $622,645 $945,604 $575,280
Structure improvements 25,344 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Misc studies 15,000 30,000
' Street improvements 706,867 97,945 702,185 372,645 895,604 525,280
Shingle Creek Reg Pond 925,000 1,750,000
Reimburse SCRP (1,325,000) (1,425,000)
' Palmer Lake Impr 200,E
Debt service $242,190 $238,957 $240,510 $241,350 $241,500 $240,940
Operating costs 196,861 160,635 167,818 170,079 172,422 174,849
' Ending $359,221 $482,645 $406,265 $504,504 $334,203 $575,844
balance
Lona -term ImDrovements
The Phase II study which expanded upon the Local Water Management Plan has identified numerous
' deficiencies and opportunities for improvement. As more funds become available when the revenue
bonds used to construct Cahlander Park and Pond are retired, a program of water quality improvements
will be developed. Of particular concern are strategies to improve water quality in Upper and Middle
' Twin Lakes, and to complete what is expected to be a series of improvements in the Palmer Lake
basin. Potential regional ponding opportunities have also been identified, as well as a series of
structural improvements
2. STREETS, SIDEWALKS, AND TRAILS
' Improvements to streets, sidewalks, and trails are funded from a variety of sources. The largest of
these are the Special Assessment Construction Fund, special assessments, the various public utilities,
Municipal State Aid, and the Local State Aid Fund. The sources of funds for the Special Assessment
Construction Fund are: the General Fund; special assessment revenue bonds; special assessments; and
excess funds transferred from bond repayment funds being closed out. The Municipal State Aid Fund
is supported by gas tax revenues which are apportioned to the state, counties, and cities to provide for
1 the construction, maintenance, and reconstruction of a network of roadways known as the State Aid
System. About 21 miles of City streets are designated MSA streets, and the City receives about
$800,000 annually for these improvements. Finally, the Local State Aid Fund consists primarily of
excess funds available when special assessments on a state aid project and MSA reimbursement exceed
the cost of the project. The LSA Fund is used primarily to finance sidewalk and trail improvements,
and that part of improvements on an MSA project which is not eligible for MSA financing.
1 City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 17
' a. Streets
The City is responsible for maintaining just over 100 miles of streets; about 80 miles are classified as
neighborhood streets, and just over 21 miles as Municipal State Aid streets. Capital improvements
generally include mill and overlay improvements and total reconstruction.
The Pavement Management Program conducted by Braun Intertec in 1992 has been used to help
identify the City's street reconstruction needs. From the results of this analysis and an ongoing review
of utility needs, a plan to reconstruct or rehabilitate as necessary the City's streets has been developed.
This plan has been designated the Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Program.
When this program began in 1994, it was anticipated that reconstructing or rehabilitating the City's
streets could take about 20 years, at a rate of 4 -6 miles of streets per year. On further analysis, it is
likely that financial considerations will not allow that pace to be sustained continuously. Accordingly,
it is expected that annually between 4 and 4.5 miles can be reconstructed until 2005. In 2005, 2006,
and 2007, debt on previous street improvement bonds will be retired, and the property tax levy
dedicated to servicing that debt can be redirected to the "pay as you go" projects. Realistically, after
this second five year program is complete, it will likely take about 15 years to complete the remainder
of the City.
' The policies guiding the designation of streets to be improved are as follows:
1. Improvements proceed on a neighborhood basis, rather than piecemeal and strictly on
"need." This approach has the benefits of a) minimizing construction cost by confining
improvements to one area rather than multiple sites throughout the city; b) approaching
' drainage needs on an area wide basis; and c) allowing for more efficient construction
administration and inspection.
' 2. Brooklyn Center has historically had two methods of identifying "neighborhoods ":
planning neighborhoods, and park service districts. These are fairly large areas, which
often do not make a suitable base for assessing infrastructure needs. To retain its
primary emphasis as one of infrastructure rehabilitation, for the purposes of the
Neighborhood Program, storm drainage areas are the basis of identifying
neighborhoods. However, in many cases "natural" neighborhoods do not conform
' precisely to drainage areas, so the boundaries of an improvement area might be
amended slightly to define a broader area. It may also for various reasons be prudent
to construct improvements to only a portion of a neighborhood at one time.
' 3. Priorities are established as follows:
' a) Areas with multiple needs;
b) Improvements which could immediately reduce operating costs;
C) Areas petitioned for by a majority of the property owners;
d) Areas which would complete regional improvements; and
e) Improvements which could benefit from being coincident with redevelopment.
The following table details progress in past years and projected for the coming 5 years on meeting
neighborhood infrastructure improvement needs.
' City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 18
' Table 10
Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Program Progress
CIP Street Reconstruction Miles
Local NSA i Total ; % of Total
1985 -1993 1 6.50 3.40 ? 9.90 10%
1994 1.98 - 1.98
1995 .......
3.08 3.91
1996 5.61 2.04 7.65
1997 4.61 ! 0.50 ' 5.11
1998 3.49 - 0.50 3.99
[1994 -1998 ( 18.77 ! 3.87 1 22.65 22 %1
1999 3.93 0.43 ' 4.36
......... .:........_... ... ............._..................._............. ...................._..._....._..._...................... _;............. .............................. ..........._............ .........
.............
2000 3.21 0.68 3.89
_........ ........._..............._._.. ............................_...........;................__.._..._............ ......_............_...__...... _......._._......
2001
3.52 3.52
2002 .._ 4.31 1 02 5.33 `
2003 3.91 3.91
1999 -2003 i 18.88 ' 2.131 21.021 20 1 / 1 6
[Remaining 38.45 11.59 50.041 48 0
[Total 82.60 ! 21.00 103.60
' 5 Year Improvements
1. Complete two State Aid Street projects: mill and overlay Earle Brown Drive from John Martin
Drive north to the new EBHC parking lot; and in cooperation with Brooklyn Park reconstruct
73rd Avenue from Humboldt to Camden.
e 2. Work cooperatively with Hennepin County to accomplish the widening and enhancement of
Brooklyn Boulevard from 65th to 71st Avenues.
' 3. Complete Neighborhood improvements in the Southeast area with two projects, one called
Southeast, which generally completes work south of 57th and east of Irving, and one called
Tangletown, which is the streets from 53rd to Lilac Drive, west of Logan to Centerbrook Golf
Course /Lions Park. These projects would complete the streets south of 57th in the Southeast
Neighborhood, except for 57th from TH 100 to Humboldt, and Humboldt from 57th to 53rd.
4. Complete Neighborhood improvements in the Garden City area, that is the residential area
between Brooklyn Boulevard and Shingle Creek, from CR 10 to 1 -694. This would be
accomplished over three years.
5. Complete Neighborhood improvements in the area west of Northport Park, from France to
Upper Twin Lake, from Eckberg north to Bass Lake Road.
6. Consider several landscaping and "streetscaping" projects to enhance the appearance of the
City and promote neighborhood unity and sense of place.
7. Paint all signal poles for which the City has service responsibility. LEDs installed in 1998 will
dramatically reduced energy operating costs for the signal systems, and will greatly reduce bulb
changing and other maintenance requirements.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 19
8. Complete a study of the neighborhood traffic system, and identify opportunities for traffic
calming.
Table 11
MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUND 5 YEAR PROJECTED BALANCE
............ ...............................
>«>a <>
Starting $29,416 I $97,090 $21,714 I ($18,322)I $193,613 ($101,860)
Balance
Revenues - -
Intergovernmental $843,705 $830,000 $630,000 $830,000 $830,000 $830,000
' Advance 200,000
Expenditures
Capital Outlays $377,443 $707,816 $289,080 $232,320 $743,460 $0
' France Avenue 122,553
Previous years' projects 60,067 314,613
John Martin/Earle Brown Dr 142,327 139,200
73rd, Humboldt to Camden 232,320
Neighborhood streets 175,049 131,450 289,080 0 743,460 0
Transfers $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000
' Debt service 308,588 307,560 290,956 298,745 292,013 , 292,761
Ending $97,090 $21,714 ($18,322) $193,613 ($101,860) $345,379
balance I I I
Table 12
GENERAL FUND CONTRIBUTIONS TO STREET PROJECTS 5 YEAR PROJECTED BALANCE
[ - _
ids X99 2p(# ..... ,
���Li�� � l~f7}~r.x i�us�i►iJl'3�: .< _ _ _ _ I
L , Starting $49,824 $220,228 $59,733 $274,888 $374,4921 $357,790
Balance
Revenues
1 Special assmntfund interest $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000
General fund contribution 594,000 619,000 619,000 619,000 619,000 619,000
' Expenditures
Capital Outlays $453,596 $809,495 $433,845 $549,395 $665,702 $856,045
Bellvue 358,250
St. AI's 95,346
Southeast 809,495
Garden City Central 351,230
Halifax/Grimes /France 82,615
Garden City North 549,395
Garden City South 501,392
Northport West 164,310
Tangletown 856,045
Ending $220,228 $59,733 $274,888 $374,492 $35 7 790 $150,745
Balance
' City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 20
' Lone -term Improvements
1. Continue the rehabilitation and reconstruction of residential streets, under the Neighborhood
Street and Utility Improvement program.
2. Continue improvements under the Municipal State Aid street program. These improvements
' may be coordinated with Neighborhood projects, or may be stand - alone.
3. Monitor intersections with growing traffic volumes for possible future traffic signal installation.
' 4. Continue to monitor neighborhood streets for possible traffic calming opportunities.
' b. Sidewalks and Trails
A comprehensive sidewalk system which serves all major activity areas and corridors of pedestrian
Only a few segments of this system remain to be completed. traffic has been established. O y leted. In addition, g y P
' the City has developed a plan for development of a comprehensive trail system to provide recreational
trails for pedestrians and transportation trails for bicyclists. Both on- street and off - street trails are
being developed, and integrated into the regional trail system which serves the Twin City metropolitan
area. Where feasible, trail construction is being coordinated with other construction projects to assure
1 lowest cost development of this system. Funding for sidewalk and trail improvements is provided by
two accounts within the Municipal State Aid Construction fund. Activities included in the CIP for
future consideration include:
5 Year Improvements
1. Continued maintenance and repair of existing sidewalks and trails. The City owns and
maintains about 35 miles of sidewalks, and about 12 miles of bicycle /pedestrian trails.
' 2. Construction of the 53rd Avenue Trail, which will link the Bellvue Lane redevelopment area
and the Southeast Neighborhood with the North Mississippi Regional Park.
3. Construction of a new trail in Bellvue Park from Bellvue Lane to the existing trail in the central
portion of the park.
4. Designation of on- street and on- sidewalk trail systems.
' 5. Repair of sidewalk retaining walls throughout the City.
6. Repair of landscaping nodes in the Earle Brown Farm commercial district. Most of the nodes
have been repaired, either by the John Martin Drive street project, or a separate node repair
project. Some remaining nodes will be repaired as a part of the Earle Brown Drive street
project. The nodes on the west side of Shingle Creek Parkway at John Martin Drive (the
entrance to the Hennepin County Service Center), will not be repaired because Hennepin
County plans to expand the Service Center and reconstruct that driveway into the Center.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 21
Table 13
' LOCAL STATE AID FUND 5 YEAR PROJECTED BALANCE
......
..... ;.;;:
`> zlvz ......
Starting $2,080,196 $2,125,880 I $1,464,000 $682,950 $694,060 $628,760
Balance
Revenues
Investment interest $120,650 $116,920 $73,200 $34,150 $34,700 $31,440
' DNR Trail Grant 50,000
Exoenditures
Capital Outlays $74,966 $828,800 $854,250 $23,040 $100,000 $75,000
Sidewalks 87,425 75,000 25,000 25,000
Trails 25,000 160,000
' Street improvements (37,459) (6,200) 250,000 (1,960) 100,000 50,000
Brooklyn Boulevard 600,000 604,250
Ending $2,125,880 $1,464,000 $682,950 $694,060 $628,760 $585,200
Balance
Lona -term Improvements
a. Completion of the 53rd Avenue trail link between the Shingle Creek/North Hennepin Trail
Loop trail and Bryant Avenue.
b. Consideration of the Twin Lake Trail system and Shingle Creek trail head improvements.
III. PARKS, PUBLIC FACILITIES, AND CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
t Improvements to parks and other public facilities such as the Civic Center, central garage, and fire
stations, are made primarily through the Capital Improvements Fund. Certain types of large -scale
equipment such as telephone systems are also purchased through the Capital Improvements Fund. The
Capital Improvements Fund is funded from a variety of sources, with the largest being the General
Fund and proceeds from General Obligation bond sales. In 1997, the Capital Improvements Fund was
split into two funds: the $1 million Capital Reserve Emergency Fund, and the Capital Improvements
Fund. The Capital Improvements Fund is intended for park, building, and other miscellaneous
improvements, while the Capital Reserve Emergency Fund is a restricted fund intended to provide
emergency financing for nonreimbursable emergency expenses or emergency cash flow. There is no
established minimum balance for the Capital Improvements Fund. Since all the improvements under
the following three sections are financed primarily through the Capital Improvements Fund, the table
' projecting its balance in 5 years follows the final section.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Pro ram 1999 -2003 Page 22
' ty y P P g
a. Parks
The Brooklyn Center park system is in the process of being systematically renovated. A thorough
' review of park facilities has been completed and reviewed with the community through a series of
informational meetings hosted by the Park and Recreation Commission, and a plan for improvements is
under way. This plan anticipates the continued use of the operating budget to make improvements such
as minor equipment (picnic tables, benches, trash receptacles, etc.) replacement; trail repair and
sealcoating; minor shelter building and electrical repairs; landscaping enhancements; minor tennis court
rehab; etc. Major improvements such as playground replacement; shelter replacement; replacement of
' field and trail lights; parking lot improvements; etc. would be financed through the Capital
Improvements Fund.
This plan uses the following principles to establish priorities for improvements:
1. Complete the replacement of playground equipment by 1999.
' 2. If possible, improve neighborhood parks coincident with neighborhood street and utility
improvements.
3. Provide geographic balance in improving parks, so that over a short period of time all
neighborhoods have access to at least one fully improved park.
4. Complete improvements at one Community Park per year.
5. If possible, when improving a park complete all improvements comprehensively. For
' example, complete all playground, shelter, and other large improvements as well as
smaller improvements such as replacing picnic tables, trash receptacles, bleachers, and
drinking fountains, etc., repairing basketball courts, adding landscaping, sealcoating
' trails, and replacing signs.
6. Improvements should be made systematically and annually from the Capital
Improvements Fund and General Fund, rather than periodically by bond issue
proceeds. Annual expenditures from the Capital Improvements Fund should generally
not exceed $225,000.
These prioritization principles result in a program of seven to eight years of capital improvements.
This plan does not comprehend adding major new facilities, such as additional lighted ball fields.
Addition of new facilities would increase the length of the program. After about year ten, playgrounds,
tennis courts, etc. which had been improved in the past several years would start to require
' rehabilitation or replacement, and the cycle would begin again.
This plan uses the following principles to establish the types of improvements:
1. Five parks have been designated Community Parks. These "destination parks" will
have larger playgrounds; larger, heated shelter buildings; lighted rinks and ballfields;
lighted ball fields; and other specialized facilities such as tennis courts, or football or
soccer fields. These parks are: Central /Garden City, Grandview, Evergreen, West
1 Palmer, and Kylawn.
' City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 23
2. Neighborhood parks will generally include playgrounds, basketball courts, ball
diamonds and icnic shelters and picnic areas. Some arks with traditionally strong
P P p
hockey and pleasure skating programs will include lighted rinks and smaller warming
houses. Parks which would continue to have warming houses would be: Orchard Lane
and Northport. As specialized facilities in neighborhood parks are to be considered for
major capital improvements, the neighborhood, the Park and Recreation Commission,
and the Council would review the appropriateness of the facility for the neighborhood
and the park before making that investment.
5 Year Improvements
equipment.
ete the replacement of playground
1. Compl e p
2. Continue the systematic improvement of park facilities, with major improvements in the next 5
years to Central, West Palmer, Kylawn, and Grandview.
3. Revise recreation programming as improvements are made.
4. Revisit the several parks which have had playground equipment replaced in the past few years
and add swingsets and containments. Because of new safety regulations, some of the existing
playground containments were too small to include both playground equipment and swings.
Lone Term Improvements
1. Continue the systematic improvement of park facilities:
' 2. Periodically obtain community input regarding new facilities or recreational needs, and adjust
the long -term plan accordingly.
i
1
'1
1
1
1
1
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 24
' Table 14
PARK FACILITIES FUTURE MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT NEEDS
BA 15 "AR LONG TERM
' Bellvue 1999: construct path from Bellvue Lane to ballfield, playground, and Monitor, replace as necessary
picnic shelter; create new park entrance on the south with decorative
lighting, landscaping, and fencing; relocate basketball court
' Brooklane Monitor, minor improvements through General Fund Review shelter condition
Cahlander Monitor, minor improvements through General Fund Monitor native plantings
Centerbrook GC See section below Monitor, replace as necessary
Central 1999: upgrade trails & ballfields, add concession and storage bldgs Monitor, replace as necessary
2000: expand playground, repair tennis courts, replace lights
Evergreen Monitor, minor improvements through General Fund Monitor, replace as necessary
' ( Firehouse 2000: replace shelter, lighting, bleachers; relocate basketball court Monitor, replace as necessary
Freeway 2001: replace lighting, minor improvements through General Fund I Review shelter, playground condition
Garden City 2000: review parking needs, enlarge lot if necessary, add swings ( Monitor, replace as necessary
Grandview 2003: replace shelter, ballfield /hockey lights, repair tennis courts, Monitor, replace as necessary
' pave hockey rink
Hagel Arboretum Monitor, minor improvements through General Fund
Happy Hollow 2000: replace shelter, lights Monitor, replace as necessary
Kylawn 2002: replace shelter, repair tennis courts, pave hockey rink Monitor, replace as necessary
Lakeside No improvements
` Lions 1999: replace shelter, lights, add swings, rehab Little League area Monitor, replace as necessary
pavement
Marlin Monitor, minor improvements through General Fund Monitor, replace as necessary
I North Mississippi Hennepin Parks improvements
Orchard Lane 2001: replace shelter, lights Monitor, replace as necessary
Palmer Lake East 1999: replace outfield fence Monitor, replace as necessary
2000: replace shelter, lights
' Palmer Lake West 2001: replace shelter, add storage bldg, repair tennis courts, rehab Monitor, replace as necessary
parking lot, replace lights
Palmer Lake Cooperative trailhead improvements with Hennepin Parks, such as Monitor, replace as necessary
' add picnic shelter
Riverdale 1999: add swings Monitor, replace as necessary, review
shelter condition
Twin Lake Reorient park from swimming to fishing Implement recommendations for
improvement
Wangstad 1999: Replace playground Monitor, replace as necessary
I Willow Lane 1999: replace lights Monitor, replace as necessary
2002: replace shelter, tot lot
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 25
b. Centerbrook Golf Course
Centerbrook Golf Course is a nine hole, par three course operated as an enterprise fund. It was built in
' 1986 -87 with a $1,100,000 loan and $600,000 grant from the Capital Improvements Fund. It opened
for business in Spring, 1988.
' In 1997, a revised financial plan for the golf course restructured the fund's debt and created a capital
reserve. Annually, $20,000 is to be contributed toward the reserve to provide for replacement or
reconstruction of course facilities. Maintenance equipment is replaced through the Central Garage
Internal Service Fund, and is not funded from the capital reserve.
In Winter, 1997 -98, the golf course ponds were expanded considerably and other improvements made
as a part of the Shingle Creek Regional Pond project. These ponds now serve as part of series of storm
water detention ponds which treat storm water runoff from the Brookdale commercial area and
neighborhoods to the north and west, as well as TH 100 and Brooklyn Boulevard. The Storm Drainage
Utility budgets for maintenance of these ponds, so they are not a responsibility of the golf course.
' 5 Year Imnrovements
1. Upgrade the maintenance garage to make it more usable as a maintenance shop.
2. Replace furnishings in the clubhouse as necessary.
3. Replace irrigation system controllers and some foot bridges and overlay the parking lot.
Table 15
GOLF COURSE FUND 5 YEAR PROJECTED BALANCE
_.... 1
I
Starting I $40,922 $31,648 $65,382 $109,131 $156,887 $172,826
Balance
' Revenues
Fees & rentals $239,241 $305,618 $314,787 $324,230 $333,957 $343,976
Concessions & merchandise 47,185 48,850 50,316 51,825 53,380 54,981
Interest 3,604 2,000 3,269 5,457 7,884 8,641
Expenditures
Capital Outlays $11,000 $13,000 $7,000 $8,000 $45,000 $10,000
' Clubhouse improvements 4,000 7,000 4,000 5,000
Grounds improvements 3,000 9,000 4,000 40,000 10,000
Other 8,000
Operating costs $214,000 $238,184 $245,330 $252,689 $260,270 $268,078
Cost of sales 37,000 34,750 35,793 36,866 37,972 39,111
Debt service 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 55,000
Add back depreciation (12,696) (13,200) (13,500) (13,800) (14,000) (14,400)
Ending I $31,648 $65,382 $109,131 $156,887 $172,826 $222,634
Balance
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 26
Lone -term Improvements
1. Continue systematic upgrade of facilities as necessary.
' C. Government Buildings
The City owns and operates several major facilities: City Hall and the Community Center (together, the
Civic Center); the Central Garage; and two fire stations. In addition, the City owns two of the three
municipal liquor store buildings. The City also owns and operates the Earle Brown Heritage Center, a
convention center and Inn complex developed from several buildings formerly housing the historic
Earle Brown estate and horse farm.
The Central Garage was recently remodeled and expanded and underground storage tanks removed and
replaced with a new fuel system. The major facilities improvements in 1998 -99 will be the
construction of a new public safety facility at Humboldt and 67th Avenues, and the demolition of the
west fire station /liquor store and reconstruction of a new west fire station. The east fire station will be
remodeled. A referendum authorizing the sale of $7.9 million of General Obligation bonds to finance
the public safety and fire station work was approved in November, 1997.
Improvements to the City Hall and Community Center are under consideration for potential
construction in 1999 or 2000. These improvements would correct accessibility, mechanical, and space
utilization deficiencies. Several community needs and City Hall space needs are being studied to
determine how best to address those space needs in the context of Civic Center and City Hall spaces as
additional space becomes available with the relocation of the police department to its new building in
1999. Proposed funding for the improvements would come from the Capital Improvement Fund
' Most improvements to the Earle Brown Heritage Center are considered elsewhere and are not
comprehended in this study. However, in 1998 -99 several improvements will be constructed through
the Capital Improvements Fund, to be reimbursed from the proceeds of a special $2,500,000 grant in
P p
state funds. These improvements include purchase of land for and construction of an overflow parking
lot; construction of the G barn; and construction of walkways connecting the major convention
buildings and some additional storage space. Proposed major improvements to facilities to be
' considered over the next several years include:
' S Year Improvements
1. Construct a new, larger police station, alleviating severe space shortages and providing
' upgraded facilities.
2. Construct a new west fire station and an addition to the east fire station to correct code
violations, increase training, storage, and sleeping quarters space, and increase vehicle storage
space.
' 3. Remodel City Hall to provide for improved public access and customer service and improved
Council Chambers, to meet ADA accessibility requirements, to correct code violations, and to
upgrade the roof and mechanical systems.
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 27
4. Remodel the Community Center with the emphasis on improved accessibility and to meet code
requirements.
' 5. Identify solutions to City Hall and community space needs that may be met through renovation
of vacated police space.
6. Rehabilitate the north and south parking lots at the Civic Center.
7. Complete parking lot and building improvements at the Earle Brown Heritage Center.
Lone -term Improvements
1. Monitor community facility needs. Between 2005 -2010, begin community discussions
regarding city hall and community center long -term needs.
2. Consider an additional cold storage building at the Central Garage to accommodate additional
storage needs.
d. Miscellaneous Equipment
' The City operates a Central Garage Internal Service Fund, which owns all vehicles and major
equipment. The cost of owning (depreciation, license, insurance, overhead) and operating (fuel,
preventative maintenance and repair) vehicles and equipment is charged back to the departments using
' the equipment. Replacement of existing equipment is financed from the Fund. The addition of
equipment is funded from a variety of sources: the General Fund, enterprise funds, etc. The City's
policy for the replacement of vehicles and equipment establishes a projected reasonable life cycle for
' each item. Life cycles are reviewed annually and updated on the basis of experience or changed
circumstances. New vehicles and equipment are proposed for addition to existing inventories and
replacement schedules when new needs are clearly demonstrated. Vehicle and equipment purchases
' are generally considered during the annual budget, and are no longer incorporated into the CIP.
Routine equipment purchases, such as data processing equipment, are considered through the general
' fund process and the MIS Strategic Plan, and are no longer incorporated into the CIP. However,
major equipment systems due to be considered for replacement which are beyond the scope of routine
are included here. For example, in 1998, the telephone systems which service the Civic Center,
' Central Garage, Heritage Center, Fire Stations, and Liquor stores were replaced.
5 Year Improvements
1. Replace the City's public safety and public works radio systems.
Lone_ -term Improvements
' 1. Monitor data processing, telecommunications, and other equipment needs
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 28
' Table 16
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 5 YEAR PROJECTED BALANCE
>� 0.
....................................... ...............................
( _ I
Starting $11,063,287 $7,261,401 $3,734,285 $1,973,035 $1,492,685 $1,584,315
Balance
Revenues
Investment interest $417,090 $399,380 $186,710 $98,650 $74,630 $79,220
' Golf course loan payments 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 55,000
Liquor store loan payments 28,830 30,914 24,640
Other governments 2,500,000
' Transfer from General /Liquor Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
Ervenditures
Capital Outlays $4,497,806 $6,707,410 $2,222,600 $829,000 $233,000 $347,400
Pool ozonization 32,312
East fire station 250,000 712,290
West fire station 750,000 1,697,890
Police station 1,250,000 3,083,720
Building proj contingency 1,000,000
City Hall /Comm Ctr impr 15,000 200,000 2,000,000
Park improvements 215,000 225,800 222,600 229;000 233,000 347,400
Central Garage impr 75,000
EBHC impr 1,000,000 1,500,000
' Equipment/other 192,806 600,000 -
Ending $7,261,401 $3,734,285 $1,973,035 $1,492,685) $1,584,315 $1,571,135
Balance
City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1999 -2003 Page 29
M-1
W
^�
F+I
� � � � � � r � � � � � � � � � � � �
TABLE A - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of CapitaMutlays
Water Utility Capital Improvements
a U:I< »>
.:::::: ,.;;;:.:::: 98.;:.;:;.;:.; ;;;;:.;;;:..> 9::.; >:.:.; >:::::::: a#? ...........:....................._.:........................_............................................. .....::.:::::.......::::::::::: :
03-Dec-98 . .:::.:::::......:............,..........::::::::::::::: .:::::...... : :::::::::.:::::::: :::::::::::::::.::::::: :..., ., :. ,.,... .
EXPENDITURES:
All water utility
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
SCADA Replacement 4,817 270,000
Wellhouse #3,4 rehab 7,675
Design #5, 6 exterior rehab 10,000
Wellhouse #5 & 6 exterior rehab 160,000
Wellhouse #7 rehab 13,000
Previous years' projects
Routine well maintenance 24,886 12,240 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
WATER TOWERS
Repair Paint on Tower #1 200,000
Repair Paint on Tower #2 209,754 9,820
Replace Paint on Tower #3 520,000
Landscape Tower #1 15,000
MISCELLANEOUS
Replace Fuel Tanks 21,788
Install adjustable speed drives 22,579 218,000
Portable 250 KW generator 53,275
Relocate W Fire main 70,000
Water system study update 24,500
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $283,824 $1,210,510 $423,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
FUND SOURCES:
Water Utility 283,824 930,923 423,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
NSP 279,587
TOTAL $283,824 $1,210,510 $423,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
/ Emerg I nterco nect with Brooklyn Park
.........
............ 'T-
.�"'i;L'If �
IM
r � �"�`✓,�� �, l:z��� � �'� , ` �- Tower #2 ���� � � �'
� i l
' Tower #1�" err„ 1
6 � ct \� n !
.[.,�� i
,-�^•- T z„ I : t" ; •- *`
4 C x `--� G ��
Ld
- ��l��
.. ,f.. L
iF- , Z,,i' ' '_' i' "T,
1 ,f - '*.
tn
�.
— .- _
F /' s^,,: `lam
\ f - i ce [ ^ -�-�� , /. - x ....... . �.....- �'.LL t1u- -i
n.
To
#3 a E - .
. '�
I
,. a i >'
t
:i
cit UTILITY
y �f FACILITIES
BROOKLYN
CENTER
j CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
' Engineering Division 12/98 1999 -2003
I
i
TABLE B - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Sanitary Sewer Utility Capital Improvements
: 88 .....:.:..:.:.:.....��t::.248....:..:....:1[.... .....:.........................
8.::::::::......... 9 E ::::::...................., ...:..:.:::.. :...: :...:. :.
03-Dec-98
EXPENDITURES:
All San Sewer Utility
LIFT STATIONS
INTRAC Replacement 200,000
Previous years' projects 20,572
Replace Lifts 10 & 11 and Forcemain 300,000 150,000
SEWER REPLACEMENT:
Stabilize Miss River Interceptor 200,000
MISCELLANEOUS
Replace Fuel Tanks 21,788
i
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $42,360 $200,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $150 ,000
FUND SOURCES:
Sanitary Sewer Utility 42,360 200,000 500,000 0 0 0 150,000
TOTAL $42,360 $200,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
/� F-a ;� ���r� , - j[ .�� `"��`* r-c-, \� '�-��� • f 1�1 ` '{�� ., ice'" "`CII a l Li
. . ............
LN�' I St tion
�'� f l , y .�.,.
- ': -.-,� ..-: ` (•� t...,E_!... ..� - .` _ _ ,. .........'
ta
Uft
Fri - �c �[
tu, .
l'LUT "� [ - u rn .� I l +. # �,�.!'k`• \\ ! :` �,_F'i "'' \� r
Lift
� -I�
S#tl
1""r 14 � t >�- J�,- �.�- -� e_,_•t�r G� - n '! I ��y G' � -«,�y� �", _� � ..�.�- -c_. -. �L... ! � I
!j - • ' '
`
L I tU�
I[.II [ 1 "._ C F',-I" ": a a-�.t. �7 �t10 'rr 1 ����1 [ �( ✓;{ t�F- -F.� I�
3 F I f
! / /
#11
E ilk . a - I t
�"'-
L
tat /� y
IS
,.F� � I� �-' .� �, 5t tion
LAI
>�
to i�n�`r
�. `
# 6 A` f..�..
1- I
SANITARY SEWER
Clef FACILITIES
BROOKLYN
VENTER
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Engineenng Division 12198 1999 -2003
TABLE C - Capital Improvement Program - Detail ofTapita utlays
Storm Drainage Utility Capital Improvements
........:........... 8:;::::::::::;::;::;:.:. 99:::::.::..::...:... t18.................. 4..:.::::::::::::: �t.:;;:.;;:.;:.::...._..................................:. :.::::::.:::.:::::.::::::.:::::
08-Dec-98 8 7 . .:<.. >::.<.;;; :. ::::.: ......:::.;.,,......,......... _ .,.,:,.
Storm drainage utility
EXPENDITURES: except where noted
I
SYSTEMIMPROVEMENTS
Miscellaneous structure improvments 25,344 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Previous years' projects I 26,186
WATER TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS
Shingle Creek Regional Pond 49,836 925,000 1,750,000 TIF, DTED grant, sDU, Mpls
Palmer Lake Improvements 200,000
MISCELLANEOUS
Palmer Lake Drainage Study 0 0 30,000
Surface Water Study 30,000 1/2 SDU, 1/2 cap Impr Fund
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $76,022 $980 ,344 $1,830,000 $50,000 $250,000 $50,000 $50,000
FUND SOURCES:
Storm Drainage Utility 26,186 (359,656) 405,000 50,000 250,000 50,000 50,000
Capital Improvements Fund 0 15,000
TIF 500,000
Other Governments 49,836 825,000 1,425,000
TOTAL $76,022 $980,344 $1,830,000 $50,000 $250,000 $50,000 $50,000
lum, t4
R
IM, /
A�e �Ei
EE
j it
t��� �jt'1�t'��y�� 1C �Y i.- �'' -�'�'— ~l.-t- .a � ¢ °�r �: ro c` ` • �� . K , . .'� � :. � /�-_ �
X71 i �: ( �i� 't -''fi ``�` �-=-" �S � 4•- " `?°' I I - 1 l `l �'T n . �
. t��t
l y - ....... -it
r J I
�.
EE
Y
1
STORM DRAINAGE
City of FACILITIES
BROOKLYN
CENTER
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Engineering Division, 12/98 1999 -2003
TABLE D - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Sidewalk and Trail Improvements
08-Dec-98 .:....:...............:.:..::..............::::::::::::.::::::::::.::::::.::.::::::::::::::::::: :...,..::.::..:::.::::..:..:::,
EXPENDITURES: Local State Aid
except where noted
OFF - STREET TRAIL:
Kylawn /Preserve 25,000 50% DNR match
Miscellaneous park trails 60,000
53rd Ave Greenway Trails 100,000 50% DNR match
ON- STREET TRAIL:
Marking and signage General Fund
SIDEWALK:
Miscellaneous repairs* 24,184 54,350 50,000 25,000 25,000
Repair retaining walls 25,000
Repair streetscape nodes 33,075
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $24,184 $112,425 $235,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000
FUND SOURCES:
State Aid - Local 24,184 112,425 185,000 0 25,000 0 25,000
DNR 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0
TOTAL $24,184 $112,425 $235,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000
*In 1998, sidewalk repairs anc retaining wall repairs were combined into one project.
; - X - T - 1 7 • tt"i ll1. a � {/ '-� te a` m
ggin
�� r
�'�..'
�s
HE
i
�L
t �i� E
[ I
�.-.
�y.— •�''"� fi � 1;- ^- •,,,."` }` '� _ I _ I I :E� r,�.+c: Wit- p� '�
r j H
v
Preserve c . �; �1 �r %�� ,� '
�s is
y �T
To-
��� i� n� „,r � r i'a 1 Nom- H�
El
f"
d 53rd Avenue
tl Greenway
Lw
� 7 r
i
SIDEWALK AND TRAI L
cit of FACILITIES
BROOKLYN
CANTER
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Engineering Division, 12/98 1999 -2003
I
T�LE I " -Ca " pit " al Improvement ' Mogram- De ail o apita ut ays M M M
Park Improvements
..:.::.::.: ;; ::.....:..:... :; .;;;;;;;:.......... ...;.;;;:..;.::.;:;:........... .
:::: >. , cQ ......... .........8........ . .
F�.1 N>::5 f3aJ RAE "'
03- Dec -98 'L?l _ '#99$ <: '99 _QQE}.
EXPENDITURES: all ok
Bellvue
Shelter, playground, lights, misc 51,500 20,000 All Cap Impr Fund
Brooklane except as noted
Cahlander 10,000
Central
Shelter, ballfield, plaza pond 90,000
Lighting 30,000
Tennis, plaza 40,000
Centerbrook Golf Course
Clubhouse impr 3,000 4,000 7,000 4,000 5,000 Golf Course Fund
Grounds impr 9,000 4,000 40,000 10,000 Golf Course Fund
Other 8,000 Golf Course Fund
Evergreen
Shelter, lighting, misc 108,500
Firehouse
Picnic shelter, lighting, misc 39,400
Freeway
Lighting, etc 19,000
Garden City
Enlarge parking lot, misc 45,400
Grandview
Shelter, ball field lights, misc 3,800 312,400
Happy Hollow
Playground equipment 25,000
Shelter, misc 31,400
Kylawn
Shelter, tennis courts
Shel , to , misc 3,800 132,000
Lions
Shelter, lighting, misc 30,200
Marlin
rr �■r rr rr rr rr pica r r Pr � � rr M M M M
TABLE E - Capital Improvement - De ail o apita utiays
Park Improvements
:; ..;: >:..;....:.; U
::::::.:,:.::::zaa: >:.::::: zo.:.::.:.:: a ::::.:.::.. .....:::.::::.:::::::::::.:::::
- Dec -98 :::::::... 9 .:::::::::::::.:. 98>:::>::> :::: >:: >;:: >:<�.9:::::.:.:::.:. ta.:....,,.,.................. ...............................
03 ., .........
Northport
Lighting, etc 22,800
Orchard
Shelter, misc impr 45,000
E Palmer
Playground equipment 30,000 6,500
Shelter, misc impr 36,400
S Palmer
Picnic shelter, misc impr
W Palmer
Shelter, tennis courts, reconstr parking 3,800 165,000
lot, storage, misc impr
Riverdale
Picnic shelter, lighting, misc 35,000
Twin Lake
Playground, picnic shelter 35,000
Wangstad
Playground equipment 26,400
Willow Lane
Shelter, misc impr 18,500 56,000
Misc curbs 30,684
Hockey lights 8,112
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $38 ,796 $226,000 $238,800 $229 $237 ,000 $278 $357 ,400
FUND SOURCES:
Capital Impr Fund $38,796 $215,000 $225,800 $222,600 $229,000 $233,000 $347,400
Golf Course 0 11,000 13,000 7,000 8,000 45,000 10,000
TOTAL $38,796 $226,000 $238,800 $229,600 $237,000 $278,000 $357,400
I (C -• ' I
\`"v] ik West Palmer
, �c � �—
jr r
Community , h k n.. I�
i f= s
�. x- ; Evergreen ry
Park "'
trr� Community �'� �-�� �s
Park
n tr j v }
�h k '\ - -� _Pa_ Lak�T� f r
.... f
Et
ffikn
Lrj _..aV 1 —E
t'
$ 8 I 7CiLiarll nG� r� � ',` rOOk�anB : FlrehOt� t�
5 -,,. i .t.A:a. r: k�7 1 t a�' . 1 - _ w `.. ` -�-, i �".'_ _ .; ... �. I� - I� i . t "6
T ,... t .._.� � (� --i .`' . � � . 'T � — t` � \L..���
J � �4L� ., 4 -1 -x { y } si 'w r ~ C� . *�� /'..
•` stall' o
€ M.
K lawn/ to r - Central / •° ` �' _% Grandview i
y
Garden Cit `< ' �i ✓i' Community
! Y L .. /� Y
Arboretum `' Community Park h
Community +`� # Park /� . a r .:
Park , f� North
✓� d' — / L�r f ,c �� E� Mtss:asippi
/� r/
Rego nal
�E
�n�t -a .� . -. [t c �`_`• F y 1
Ce ..rook � t e � ,�
,
t 1 y
O
( 1
v vi
WE
'1
in
st `i �
win�^'ir ;.
r
cit of PARK FACILITIES
BROOKLYN
CENTER
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Engineering Division, 12/98 1999 -2003
r r r r r r r r r r rr � r r r iri r r r
TABLE F - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Public Building Improvements
08-Dec-98
__....
Capital Impr Fund
EXPENDITURES: except where noted
CIVIC CENTER
Construct new police station 91,280 1,250,000 2,958,720 GO Bonds
Additional PD technology 125,000
Rehabilitate City Hall /Comm Cent 7,472 15,000 2,000,000
Replace phone systems 192,806
Replace radio system 600,000
Pool ozonozation 3,093 32,312
Rehab parking lots 200,000
CENTRAL GARAGE
Replace fuel tanks 122,532 Cap Impr Fund, Utilities
Garage addition 1,151 75,000 Cap Impr Fund, Utilities
FIRE STATIONS
Remodel East Station 37,710 250,000 712,290 GO Bonds
New West Station 152,110 750,000 1,697,890 GO Bonds
Fridley training facility 25,000
Building project contingency 1,000,000
EBHC
Building & parking lot impr 1,000,000 1,500,000 State grant funds
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $440,348 $4,565,118 $7,193,900 $2,000,000 $600,000 $0 $0
FUND SOURCES:
Capital Improvements Fund 159,248 2,315,118 (675,000) 2,000,000 600,000 0 0
Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility
GO Bonds 281,100 2,250,000 5,368,900 0 0 0 0
Other governments 0 0 2,500,000 0 0 0 0
TOTAL $440,348 $4,565,118 $7,193,900 $2,000,000 $600,000 $0 $0
_ ;11 ■11 = ►qua niliin.mi.: �� _� �� �_' y
1�� �P■.L nun Sn °�:�:: :_ _�.wh h / hI111n\ �: • C- 41111111 = - u�M��nnun .'.0 =gym �
■ 1 \- / �,; `♦v : .:....•L L_ - Ing1,t hI h � nuuu■ L .. _ ► ■: 1 =: : ° : .0
°'' y • -_ �� r::::::n .r � 'nu Aiii Maw: : _ ■m■n ■ : S .. � .V— � %::
� _ .• .• .. •T� . - ._ LIx� .i : ■■ nn■ ■ Ii Mai E ° p j.�� '
�� _ •_... r. �� ::.i. / Iryiq /. n Ma ■ . L G= Li OEM
M - 7
v
%, x�, ��4 r;�j :: -: pp LL LL A.� L► C , ! E � aI n - n nS :p � .: �M\.
EW
c nun \ .j n . ■ _ .- E �►i0 ♦ - ■nunl L n m nf•4 • u -��� t�P.
�, m „µiW ` w. x n ►����I �nnn mom` _ = :::�:i 0 .�� 1 1 .. _ : n - _�_ ?_ Ar J `
Mal �u�,. ,� .flfl L•�� ' : r �t � "++� +FE �ll: •Ein c ii - n In
_ _� ►��.'�� � _ � ..pi►nmis � ' � ane 7 III � ■ �: C
� °��� _ � � _ L •- 111 = - -w
- �
Mann •- - .. _ - : s
■ • 11 . E :t:.:una. r f
/• ��1IOO11 x1111 IIIIIn� 0111• °••t111Ih • ■4. �.
-. IIIIIIn x11.1 111111 L ♦ - - -- -- -- � '
_ �'I �e umm um�nnm L � gip M ° iuun.•.•'•Miii . � ■ '� _ ,. 1�� G � � '�
■. un nmx nm flow w � � _ nnw'o� a uy . .- E- a „= i
- �♦. nuH_ L� LL LL r -- LL LL :: L_ ' � 11 It nn.n x1 � r EL LL :: ■. ur � -
::r .N- - C�v:L - . -- -E ♦ In nnumw ' - - •_ : �
- �nG C? - .... L/ � •: _: L= �: =i �� � ul uawnwuir J�, ,�, __ � -- = w — .
7• ._ _L PI .. ... \Inn. I.nnw NII ti. Ih — ��
���iliiiCn7o•� °� ♦� e _ , ♦ ♦ ♦�� � � .. now IJ ( � � ;�
-
nn .nun ■n I ix L \ •• -► �� N'� ; i 11
■ nm/ � - L L :.: uuI U/1 a : m n now � • 1- ■ 1 : � i 1�
- S= - -Hour 11111 x 1 � • � n muni � . P it
h . mnu
11111 � � - E E3 � pj�•4/1nO111 L. �� III, hii 1 t'
�V E � � na iiiiiiiiini' I t. �/pi. � •::: _ - __ �� �
US
-
�
Inns ♦ 0 ♦ �♦ Y' __ - - u L _c :. 1
Innln �_ ��► ♦♦ ♦, ►0 ♦ ♦ ♦� ...- _R_'■. �n �� -_ =r ..- __� _c k .
't " ,
� ems. �� ■n .111 IIIIIn11n1 '• -:: - =Han .5 .: irL rIn - 11
1 �'r f+ a i - r .I n /1.11llnllx n�lfl r ...a. _ - - �- __ ■ 1. - �
F �� k �nm °t ► =y ' t E =iiiu�l,i ° S °�_ = = - = -�� '
jr. r �s 6 #,: ■n u1n i�i.� ► : :::!�SSS - L: =.” _� Chu = =. =" - s � -
Hill
-
93� --
r'jpp�a
a� n Manna •-
� 1, � In111111111 �� � Q� M
F' J
`��� AJ�11111N it ��rq'iT:
c,
I
M 1=1 = = IM IM M M IM IM IM M = = M
TABLE G _ Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements |
ft
08-Dec-98 �
°, ,°,°, ^",°,°,°,°,~~~.,,°~.~..~.~.~~.�~.~...�~~`.......~..,''^`.....'.~.~~,^~~~.....�~~'^..~.'~^~-'� �
EXPENDITURES: �
SIGNALS �
Replace lamps with LCDu 14.000 Local State Aid �
Aid
Pn|o painting & restoration *| on 25.000 Local �
STATE AID STREETS
Provious years' projects 15.467 60.087 314.613 N1GA+Regu}or
France Avenue, UQhtoN City Lim 885.350 98.079 122.553
K4SA'Rngu|ar 389.037 122.553 KASA-Regular
K4SA'Louo| (115.643) 28.488 Local State Aid
Water Utility 215.440 51.122 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 06.858 18.468 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility (37.287) U Storm Drainage Utility �
�
Special Assessments 158.350 Special Assessments �
John Martin/Earle Brown Drive 149.864 180.00
/NGA-Regular 142.327 130.200 /NGA-Regular �
K8SA+Loco| (129.102) (114.200) Local State Aid
Water Utility 3.337 8.000 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 4.000 8.000 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility O 0 Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments 123.162 110.000 Special Assessments
Brooklyn Boulevard, O41htoN City Limits 000.000 1.899.550 500.000
ROW Acquisition 600.000 Local State Aid
�
Road Construction 2.000 509.550 Utilities, SpAoueuo.K8S
�
Lighting, Landscaping 1.300.000 500.000 T|F. Local SA, |STEA
73nd. Humboldt 0oTH252 352.000
K88A-Regular 232.320 MSA-Regular
N1SA-Local (51.900) Local State Aid
Water Utility 58.320 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 56.320 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments 59.000 Special Assessments
TABLE G - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements
08-Dec-98 ,
COMMERCIAL STREETS
James /67th 180,541 70 % Special assmnts,
MSA -Local 22,773 Local State Aid
Water Utility 2,800 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 2,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility 2,000 Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments 150,968 Special Assessments
Lee /68th 196,604 30% LSA
MSA -Local (25,875) Local State Aid
Water Utility 18,229 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 3,500 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility 3,850 Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments 196,900 Special Assessments
Earle Brown Dr N of Summit, M &O 100,000
MSA -Local 8,000 Local State Aid
Water Utility 5,000 Water Utility
Sanitary Sewer Utility 5,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility
Storm Drainage Utility 12,000 Storm Drainage Utility
Special Assessments 70,000 Special Assessments
NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS
Orchard West
Sp Assess Constr Fund 517,929
MSA -Local 54,926 500
Water Utility 885,159 77,100
Sanitary Sewer Utility 570,652 53,823
Storm Drainage Utility 257,518 30,108
Street Assessments 1,037,402
Storm Drainage Assessments 337,863
Bellvue Neiqhborhood (as of 11/3
Sp Assess Constr Fund 358,250
MSA - Regular 175,049
MSA -Local 51,816
Water Utility 106,206
Sanitary Sewer Utility 303,667
Storm Drainage Utilty 705,101
Street Assessments 426,732
Storm Drainage Assessments 141,518
i
r� rr rr r r r rr Ir r r � r r r �■r �r rr rr rw
TABLE G - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements
OS- Dec -98 :::>:<:::»:<,.::;.::;:::.;;:.;:.;:' �, 9:;;;;:.;:.:;.;:<.;:.;:<;::.::::.::: :::, :..:::::::::::::::::::::::: .:::::..
St. AI's Neighborhood as of 11/3
Sp Assess Constr Fund 95,346
MSA- Regular
MSA -Local
Water Utility 16,276
Sanitary Sewer Utility 95,783
Storm Drainage Utilty (34,192)
Street Assessments 186,390
Storm Drainage Assessments 64,614
SE Neiqhborhood
Sp Assess Constr Fund 809,495
MSA - Regular 131,450
MSA -Local 50,000
Water Utility 367,700
Sanitary Sewer Utility 490,270
Storm Drainage Utilty 85,945
Street Assessments 795,440
Storm Drainage Assessments 258,900
Garden Citv Central
Sp Assess Constr Fund 351,230
MSA - Regular 289,080
MSA -Local 75,000
Water Utility 630,520
Sanitary Sewer Utility 474,180
Storm Drainage Utilty 520,160
Street Assessments 831,195
Storm Drainage Assessments 272,210
Halifax /Grimes /France
Sp Assess Constr Fund 82,615
MSA - Regular
MSA -Local
Water Utility 69,565
Sanitary Sewer Utility 58,580
Storm Drainage Utilty 51,325
Street Assessments 78,480
Storm Drainage Assessments 25,560
|
� TABLE G_ Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays
Street Improvements
�
08-Doo'98
Garden CdvNorth
Sp Assess ConsbFund 540.395 �
NiSA-Regular O
W1SA'Louo| 50,000
588
Water Utility . 625 �
Sanitary Sewer Utility 477.180
Storm Drainage Ud|ty 372.645
Street Assessments 712.790
Storm Drainage Assessments 253.025
Garden CitvSouth
Sp Assess ConxkFund 501.392
/NGA'Regu|ar 469.800
/NSA-Loca| 100.000
Water Utility 442.325
Sanitary Sewer Utility 442.325
Storm Drainage UU|ty 701.284
Street Assessments 834.825
Storm Drainage Assessments 210.170
Northport Wes
Sp Assess ConstrFund 104.310 �
/NSA'Regu|or 273.660
MSA-Loou|
Water Utility 239.500
Sanitary Sewer Utility 239.500
Storm Drainage UbKy 134.320
Street Assessments 352.640
Storm Drainage Assessments 83.000
Tonn|ehmvn
Sp Assess ConutrFund 858.045
MSA+Regu|ur
N1GA'Looa| 50.000
Wa Utility 595.180
Sanitary Sewer UUU 595,180
. 18O
Storm Drainage UU 525,280
. 28O
Street Assessments 842,300
Storm Drainage Assessments 255.895
TABLE G - Capital Improvement Pmrogram - De all oM, " apit " 511MMYS
Street Improvements
08-Dec-98 ::::....::::::::.. $> .....:....::...... I .......:::.::::. QI .::::.::::::::::: ' .:::::..::::...............................................:..:...............:::::::: ::::::::::::::::.. ::::::::.....
ENHANCEMENTS
Paint 69th Avenue parkway fence 25,000 Local State Aid
Southeast Neighborhood Loop 75,000 Local State Aid
Xerxes Avenue Streetscape 100,000 Local State Aid
BCIP Streetscape 250,000 TIF
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $4,362,275 $3,555,040 $4,336,366 $5,884,250 $3,834,240 $5,315,050 $3,719,880
FUND SOURCES:
MSA - Regular 385,104 377,443 707,816 289,080 232,320 743,460 0
MSA- Local (60,717) (37,459) 593,800 854,250 (1,960) 100,000 50,000
Water Utility 1,100,605 275,069 380,700 769,185 622,945 681,825 595,180
Sanitary Sewer Utility 667,508 481,240 503,270 585,860 533,480 681,825 595,180
Storm Drainage Utility 220,231 706,867 97,945 702,185 372,645 895,604 525,280
Special Assessments: Streets 1,193,752 1,090,152 984,440 1,259,675 771,790 987,465 842,300
Special Assessments: Storm Dr 337,863 206,132 258,900 297,770 253,625 309,170 255,895
Sp Assess Constr Fund 517,929 453,596 809,495 433,845 549,395 665,702 856,045
TIF 0 0 0 442,400 250,000 250,000 0
Other Governments 250,000 250,000
TOTAL $4,362,275 $3,553,040 $4,336,366 $5,884,250 $3,834,240 $5,315,050 $3,719,880
► ' ;1111111 =� �p�qu nmi:rnN. � t: •• � =
�� .. �P■ .� 1-1 �� n■ n■ O C7 � •.Uyl� a7 jgINO �: � C: d /1 /1 /in _- :- ■n N� ulr / N■• � �� C� �.
t� ,% �_ Q�q■ :p :� +:: �nui � � �' iiiiiiiiii � : i� - � :N v�� /U: �: _ �_
_ _ �,����,;, . - -_ :: �.`� •�7 �� - :ur■i�g 3 + ■■ noon ■■ n. n :_ 77 �_ i.Y � �' •
. `' ;MZ :� .3 __ C. � �: •1 a ►OJi�ry�• . nnntl ■■ i - ��� •
:�' ,�nn.• c . �p m m alp :� S= ►i i • ,I -� nnuu ■■ .O ni n■ :■V �. ��p■ •
III_ = ,.1111111 � ��• :: \I -- _: - -U : ' /i! in► _ . - e = =r =� - - CI /11111 /:' � • - m � • _�
L J= = - :m . = �1:1�' °- -° "" = ud►unln% � X - iiiiiiiii /� + �.1�III'� S
1,11111- =� -- C :. 11■ • •- � 0 � :: � � ■,..� = =" =,..
ImmJi lJJ�i�� � �� i� _ �: �"■
� - IIyJIII�� V�� I � � : ■i : � •
_
-
gggffij
■OOnO•N ■ ■ ■■
: gnn0 ■0n■� It11W. nNltiiiti: �111����`� I �x 1 ! � �. _ ', �r
_
P °'
111 ■11111. _PINIIIO ..■ 1111■ ■0_ - .11 cm ��E,� ►,:{:
/IIOOP :: _o.: ■ :_ _- - :iiiio......11- W "' �- r;nn , '%•'� �— _. � pl
•nuns• _+ _ - : Nn I � �� „ _ _
■ _ � e::i Nu/ !anti -� "�"� r• � _ -
-
aV : n►i P. � ' 1,.r/ia "..��� . �� . 7 � �0_ _ _ ��
y01111111■ • � ��� • � ___ __ - �
7-�nnnuol � 9 ��s 1 .� � ♦ _ _ _ - .0 -
i • ��I® 1 ® =- - _- -- -- �_
ME
•110 .in® ... ,�_ �. =' ■_■ ..
-
,, .sly ■tl.. ...__:_ 1 11 ® 7 =� - _ == = :111:=9_1 "_ =�
■ 1 r • I I
IN
� 1■ ltltl ■M � � �� —.. � � b � __ �� C
.Ntmuullll� -� %-uUt #f�•� �� IIL- k '� ( � c � �I� „ � I c�:.l =• - = � _ ' ■IrlNlmin6mlli �
, O 1111111111111 _ +_ ,���
_ � �_ �gll��Ji►q►py
\�` =:111 • -rf1<t� ,
t � 111111!IrTi��'
® J
1
000 , ,
City Council Agenda Item No. 7b
1
•
City of Brooklyn Center
A great place to start. A great place to stay.
To: Mayor and Council Me ers
i
From: Michael J. McCauley
I
City Manager
Date: December 10, 1998
Re: Budget
OVERALL BUDGET
On September 14th, the City Council adopted the preliminary 1999 budget and preliminary levy.
The final levy proposed for 1999 is:
••; 1999
HRA $129 $138,656 $9,189
EDA $183,113 $194,898 $11,785
® Gen. Fund ( &debt) $7,374 $7,563,304 $188,760
TOTAL TAX LEVY $7,687,124 $7,896,858 $209,734
The 1999 budget continues several changes in presentation and substance implemented in 1997.
The budget has been developed, consistent with City Council direction, on the premise that bonds
will not be issued in 1999 for street projects or in the future, where such projects represent a
continuing replacement effort, as opposed to buildings or other major capital projects that are not
an annual effort. (If bonds had been issued for the City's share of the 1997 street projects, over
$900,000 in extra costs would be incurred for interest and issuance costs over the life of the
bonds.) The 1999 proposed budget has all City General Fund and Debt Service real estate taxes
in the general fund with a corresponding transfer out for the payment of the city's portion of debt
service. This allows for a clearer picture of the total city real estate tax levy. The real estate taxes
levied by the separate legal entities of the HRA and EDA are set forth in their respective budgets.
The budget provides for 164 full time positions in all funds. As discussed later in this
memorandum, this represents an increase in full time personnel, generally accomplished through
a decrease in part -time and seasonal personnel costs. The budget reflects a 3 % increase in wages.
A contract with the LELS Union has not yet been negotiated for 1999.
Administrative service charges are $415,538, allocating personnel costs from the General Fund
to various enterprise funds for management, engineering, and financial services. The breakdown
6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy Brooklyn Center, YIN 55430 -2199 • City Hall & TDD Number (612) 569 -3300
Recreation and Community Center Phone & f f fb Number (612) 569 -3400 • FAX (612) 569 -3494
An Affirmatiue Action /Equal Opportunities Employer
of those charges is set forth in the narrative for Budget Code 474. The administrative service
charges are at roughly the same level as the 1996 ($394,123), 1997 ($399,141) and 1998
($415,538) budgets. $322,000 is budgeted for engineering reimbursement for construction project
work charged against construction projects. This is an increase of $22,000 over the 1998 budget
reflecting project document management. The difference in presentation from the pre -1997 budget
is that these reimbursements and administrative service charges are set forth in a separate division
(474 Reimbursement from other Funds), rather than as a contra charge within the various
departments. The goal of this presentation shift is to more easily understand the personnel costs
in each department and the charging out of services.
This budget absorbs a $57,348 increase in building costs for a partial year of operation of the new
police station. The 2000 budget will have to be increased for a full year and actual experience.
Attached to this memorandum is a listing of increases and decreases by departments.
Budget Format.
The budget summary sheets now refer to "Purchased Services" rather than "Consulting" for the
grouping of the following expenses
Charter Commission
Professional Services
Benefits Administration
. Legal Services
Audit & Financial Services
Medical Services
Instructors
Casual labor
CARS administration has been separated from Recreation Administration into a separate section
of the budget to reflect its overall supervision of several sections of the budget, including
recreation, buildings & grounds, and pool. This treatment is consistent with other parts of the
budget where Public Works Administration and Earle Brow Heritage Center Administration are
set out as separate sections of the budget.
Q VF,R VTF
W O F THE GENERAL FUND
REVENUE
Revenues are increased in the 1999 proposed budget by $317,350. This is a 2.41 % increase. The
rate of increase is insufficient to keep up with the increased costs of personnel over time.
Personnel costs represent 62.42 % of the 1999 General Fund Budget. Personnel costs were 61.71 %
of the 1998 budget. Real estate taxes account for 56% of the General Fund. revenues.
Intergovernmental revenues, primarily from the State of Minnesota, are increasing only 1.06%
over 1998. The State increased the costs of pension contributions in 1998, but only funded the
resulting increase at the 1998 levels. Thus the increased pension costs as salaries rise are solely
Page 2
the burden of the City. Permit fees and miscellaneous taxes, comprised primarily of lodging taxes,
account for the only other significant increase in revenues. These sources provide $139,685 of the
increase or 33.15% of the revenue increase. Salaries and fringe benefits alone constitute $291,350
of the $317,350 budget increase. This does not include a greater potential increase in fringe benefit
costs that may result from the recent arbitration award to the Teamster's union employees.
Recreation fees are budgeted at lower levels in the 1999 budget reflecting current and recent past
revenue rates.
The 1997 State Legislature instituted changes in the real estate tax system. For taxes payable in
1999, lower class rates will be in effect for commercial, industrial, and apartment properties.
These class rate reductions have the impact of shifting some of the tax costs to single family
residential properties. Thus, while property values rose in 1997 and 1998 for taxes payable in
1998 and 1999, tax capacities for apartments, commercial, and industrial properties dropped.
Residential market value and tax capacity increased. The following charts illustrate this shift:
!Tax Capacities j
i
' I
10 _
— I '. ■ — i99 6
_ 6 — ' I, 1997
1999
4
2 '',
A p anment Coounaciai industrial int
Residential Fa
Market Values'
8(N)
. 1996
1997
}W
',, . 1998
1999
2W
3 :
' Apartment Commercial htdusMal Residential Fann
Page 3
The 1999 budget continues the direct transfer from the Liquor Fund to the Capital Improvement
Fund of $75,000. This continues the change made by the Council in the 1998 budget to have these
liquor revenues used for the specific purpose of making capital improvements to benefit the
community.
EXPENDITURES
The 1999 General Fund budget reflects an overall increase in expenditures of 2.41 %. Cost of
operations in the General Fund budget increases at a rate of 2.52 %, or $307,943 of the overall
$317,350 increase in General Fund Expenditures (however, $42,750 of that sum is for the
Convention & Visitors Bureau). The remaining increases are spread as follows:, $7,935 for street
bond debt service and $1,472 for Police & Fire bond debt service. This increase compares with
the 1997 budget, which in 1996 budget terms, actually represented a decrease in operating costs.
There was a 2.6% increase in the 1998 operating budget of $315,726 (including an additional
$7,935 for debt service on previously issued bonds for street projects prior to 1997).
Contingency in the 1999 budget is modest. The year 2000 issue is being pursued both internally
and with Logis and private computer consultants. A survey of our systems has been conducted by
a consulting firm and planning will continue. As with most other organizations, we do not have
a final quantification of the cost of addressing year 2000 issues. Providing a contingency fund
provides the council with flexibility in responding to unanticipated requests, needs, and
opportunities. It also provides some coverage for unanticipated impacts such as heavier or more
frequent snow /ice removal that may exceed budgeting based on average expectations. Some
revenues in the General Fund budget are also subject to influences beyond the City's control, such
as building activity (building permit fees), court fines (judicial discretion), and sales of
merchandise.
NEW INITIATIVES
The budget continues $5,000 (Code 471 Object 4400 Other Contractual) to participate in a 4 city
group with the Greater Minneapolis Metropolitan Housing Corporation in a home ownership
resource center for the 4 city group. The resource center received substantial funding from the
McKnight Foundation in order to be started. The center provides assistance in a number of
different ways to home owners to purchase and remodel existing homes. This program
compliments the code enforcement effort by assisting people in accessing the expertise necessary
to bring homes up to code or to make improvements. The Greater Minneapolis Metropolitan
Housing Corporation anticipates receiving additional grant funding that will allow it to expand its
program offering in the home improvement /rehabilitation areas. This will further leverage the
City's investment in this joint undertaking.
C ONIlbTUNICATIONS
Newsletters will be mailed to persons in apartments in 1999, following the initiative started in
1998. The traditional delivery mechanisms using non - profit groups will continue for houses at
least at the start of 1999, but may shift to mail based on continuing review of costs. This mail
Page 4
delivery will reach approximately 3600 apartments that had not been receiving the newsletter and
recreation materials prior to 1998.
PERSONNEL
The budget reflects retention of the full -time position in Administration that was reduced to a part -
time position earlier this year as an experiment moving a person from Community Development
to the front desk. Actual experience and the auditor's delineation of limitations on the use of
personnel ( The auditor has indicated that the use of assessing secretary and water billing clerks
poses audit control problems.), indicates that having shifted permits to the front, we need to staff
the front desk with 2 people to cover absences and provide service. The shift has improved
service. The position is reconfigured as customer service. This has no impact on the budget since
the number of full time persons performing these functions remains at the same level as the 1998
budget.
-The fire chief requested additional part -time pay for drills and duty. Drill pay was added in the
1997 budget ($35,000). Chief Boman's original 1999 budget request was for $30,000 in 1999. His
modified request to phase in an additional $10,000 in each of the next 3 years has been
incorporated in a $10,000, rather than a $30,000 increase in the proposed 1999 budget.
Public Works requested an additional engineering technician and the reduction of the use of
seasonal personnel as a partial offset to the cost of an additional technician. The specific
justification is to update project information. Specific goals have been established for the position
to replace seasonal work in the field, complete inventories of as builts, catalogue as builts, update
drawings, eliminate 50 % of the backlog that has been identified in inventory, eliminate backlog
of sight triangle complaints, update eight sections, and complete the inventory of city base maps.
The net impact on the budget would be an additional $6,190.
Police Buildin Maintenance includes a full -time custodian position. Mr. Glasoe has reviewed a
number of options, including a janitorial service, and has recommended this as the most effective
approach for the new police building.
Central Supplies has a reduction from $74,800 in wages and benefits in the 1998 budget to provide
for additional assistance to $44,195 in wages and benefits in the 1.999 budget. I have proposed that
an entry level administrative specialist be hired instead of hiring a department head level person
as contained, but not authorized for hiring in the 1998 budget. That position would be in
administration and be assigned to special projects. For example, the person could relieve Tom
Bublitz of portions of the 53rd project, work on issues at the Heritage Center and other studies and
projects. This would provide more flexibility in directing the assistance where it is needed, rather
than having another department head level position that would not be as versatile and would be
more expensive and harder to recruit.
The proposed budget reflects a change from the August work session by adding a full time position
in recreation at a cost of $32,972 and eliminating $31,070 of part -time wages. Recreation is using
a substantial amount of part time secretarial assistance. It currently has only one full -time
Page 5
secretarial position. This vulnerability to losing personnel in a very competitive job market would
® be ameliorated providing an additional full time person that would also provide opportunities for
better staff development and staffin g in recreation.
Another change from the August draft, is a reorganization of MIS and police. The proposed
budget reduces approximately $14,000 in salary costs in police. Two clerical positions in the
police department would be slightly upgraded and have additional computer responsibilities. One
position would be re- filled at a lower assistant level (This would be replacing the Administrative
Analyst position with an administrative assistant.). The currently vacant MIS Coordinator position
would be merged with the analyst duties. The current police administrative analyst's job would
be combined with the MIS Coordinator duties and be re- classified as the MIS /Technology
Coordinator in Administration. The salary range for the MIS Coordinator position would remain
unchanged. By combining duties, we would re- organize several positions and be able to undertake
the MIS and technology duties. $10,000 of the salary cost savings has been programed in the MIS
budget to cover additional technical assistance. The opportunity to reorganize presents many
-advantages for the City. These advantages include the opportunity for a skilled City employee to
advance, greater continuity in technology operations, better focus on management of technology,
and a longer employment horizon.
COUNCIL
The annual audit and all commission related expenses are combined in the City Council budget.
The amount of money included for conferences and training allows for facilitated council
work/goal setting sessions and the implementation of the council policy on training. The budget
supports having each council member being able to attend state conferences such as the League
of Minnesota Cities Annual conference and would provide for the Mayor and 2 Council Members
on a rotating basis to attend 1 national conference.
CITY COUNCIL GOALS
The City Council established several goals for 1999. (Note: The order of goals does not reflect a prioritization
of the goals.)
Goal No. 1: Support Brookdale redevelopment by 1) use of tax increment assistance; 2) review
and evaluation of land use applications; 3)prompt construction and plan
review /inspection; and 4) monitoring developer performance
Goal No. 2: Continue and improve code enforcement and compliance activities by 1)
coordinated effort of police and community development departments; and 2)
evaluation of additional approaches to improve compliance such as greater penalties
and alternate approaches such as charging property owner for violation removal by
City if fail to comply
Goal No. 3: Increas r
Increase p oactivity towards fighting crime by 1) increased visibility of police in
neighborhoods; 2) continue and expand on high participation rate in neighborhood
Page 6
watch groups; 3) begin recruitment of park watch groups or extensions of
neighborhood watch to include parks; and 4) two newsletter articles on
neighborhood watch and encouraging active participation
Goal No. 4: Finish fire and police building construction
Goal No. 5: Evaluate housing programs and policies by 1) Council decision on resource
allocation; 2) survey current practices in other cities on occupancy limits and
coordinate that review with housing commission; 3) continue ARM participation;
4) Council decision on point -of -sale ordinance; 5) review first -time home buyer
programs; and 6) review potential and actual offerings by Greater Metropolitan
Minneapolis Housing Corporation
Goal No. 6: Plan for needed work at Community Center and City Hall by 1) preparation of
overview of options, mandatory Americans With Disabilities Act modifications and
required repairs to walls, roofs, and heating, ventilation, air conditioning; 2)
solicitation of citizen input; 3) development of plans with architect and construction
manager; and 4) development of budget
Goal No. 7: Create neighborhood traffic safety plan including 1) enforcement of speed limits;
and 2) define goals and attainable results by hiring consultant to assist in
development of neighborhood traffic safety planning and coordinating with
neighborhood watch groups
Goal No. 8: Continue and improve long -term financial planning which includes 1) five -year
planning for utilities and capital improvements; 2) expand five -year planning for
other funds; and 3) review and develop contingency planning
Principles to Guide Actions in the Form of Goals:
1. Place priority on Brooklyn Boulevard redevelopment
2. Incorporate elements to make city more visually appealing where and as possible
in projects and developments
Some specific ways the budget supports those goals are as follows:
Goal 2 is supported by continued funding of code enforcement. The liaison position is in the
budget and will continue. Continuity from 1998 into 1999 should enable the program to improve
and be more effective.
Goal 3 is supported by continued funding of police positions and the newsletter publication.
Goal 5 is supported with the administrative assistant position that would provide greater capacity
to undertake projects and research.
Page 7
Goal 7 is supported by funds in Central Supplies and Services for professional services and the
police department's commitment to increased and systematic traffic enforcement.
Goals 1, 4, 6, and 8 are supported by personnel levels to undertake the projects and provide
support to the City Council in achieving the goals.
ADMINISTRATION
Administration continues the reconfiguration with separate divisions for human resources and city
clerk. Central Services contains funds for an administrative specialist at a rate greatly reduced
from the potential position carried there in the 1998 budget for a new position. Monies budgeted
for an intern position are not carried over from the 1998 to the 1999 budget.
HUMAN RESOURCES /FINANCE
- Continuing the shift that occurred in the 1998, these two divisions will continue performing
additional employee benefit administration done in- house. This initiative results in a continued
reduction in the cost of purchased services from a private vendor of services.
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND LOGIS
The MIS department's capital monies are allocated primarily for system equipment. Individual
computer equipment has generally been allocated within individual departments to more fully state
the true cost of individual departmental operations to include their cost of computer equipment
used exclusively within a department. A substantial amount of work will be devoted to the new
building projects in the planning and placement of technology resources.
Logis charges in the General Fund are up, even though an entire program has been dropped. The
recreation system is being purchased directly from the vendor. The cost of going through Logis
has been approximately $14,000 per year. We are budgeting a one -time fee of $14,000 to purchase
a license from the vendor and paying $4,000 for annual use and support. The cost of the police
mobile computing devices has increased approximately $10,000 for 1999. Logis is also talking
about a contingency charge of $25,000 for a new financial software above the budgeted amount.
The amount of contingency in the 1999 budget is very tight with potential year 2000 issues making
a claim upon it.
POLICE
The police budget represents the largest single increase in costs, primarily due to personnel. (The
police budget has increased $133,668 in its regular categories and $57,348 for police building
maintenance for a total increase over 1998 of $191,016 or fully 60% of the entire net increase in
the 1999 budget.) The budget reflects a reduced budgeted amount for prisoner incarceration and
processing by Hennepin County based on current experience and the additional space when the
new police building is finished. The Chief will continue to review possible use of Brooklyn Park's
facility. There are increased costs in the police budget for printing for the transition to a new
Page 8
location. Staffing levels are maintained in the budget.
is
FIRE
Payment for drills continues the system that was initiated in the 1997 budget. As indicated in the
personnel discussion of this transmittal, the budget increases the amount paid for part -time work
by fire fighters by $10,000 as part of a request from the fire chief to increase these wages by a
total of $30,000 spread over 3 years.
CENTRAL GARAGE
While not part of the General Fund, Central Garage charges have a profound impact on the
General Fund. When the Central Garage was instituted full replacement of equipment was not
funded, since charges for depreciation had not accumulated for equipment being replaced prior to
-full accumulation of depreciation charges necessary for replacement. The goal is to have
replacement fully funded in order to fully implement the central garage concept. As part of the
implementation, several changes were incorporated into the General Fund budget in 1997:
1) interest earned in the fund has been spread out against the individual pieces of
equipment
2) items having a value below $5,000 have been removed from the central garage fund
replacement schedule (items below $5,000 for garage use, as opposed to other
departments, will still be budgeted, but not on a depreciation schedule)
3) police vehicles are sold rather than recycled in the fleet; this reduces the cost of squads
to the police by giving them credit for the sale proceeds and eliminating charges previously
levied against them to refurbish squads for use in the fleet; maintenance costs and fuel
costs for other divisions should decrease; initial results indicate that the projected benefits
are occurring: sale of used squads is at anticipated levels; anticipated reduced operating
costs from this shift will have to be monitored over time as recently purchased new
vehicles used in departments (rather than using old squads) have little or no repair costs
BUILDINGS
The cost of building maintenance is rising. Equipment, supplies, and utilities account for the
largest part of the increase for existing buildings. Added in 1999 is the new police station for a
partial year at a cost of $57,348.
PARKS
The Capital Improvement Plan provides a five year plan for park improvements. The five year
plan finishes the replacement of playground equipment and inventories the life expectancy of the
Page 9
major components of the park facilities and improvements. The Park & Recreation Commission
• has recently completed a series of meetings in areas of the City seeking input on park planning.
The planning contemplates an allocation of resources based on the nature of facilities and the
consolidation of major improvements to have destination parks that would serve the entire city,
along with the neighborhood parks.
RECREATION /COMMUNITY CENTER
The 1999 budget continues the goals of havm g adult recreation pay for its marginal costs and
contribute to overhead. A major undertaking in 1999 will be soliciting input and designing needed
improvements to the community center and City Hall.
CIVIC EVENTS
Civic events are funded at the same level as 1998. Included is money for Earle Brown Days police
- overtime, $500 to participate in the Historical Society book project, and an unallocated $2,500 for
civic events. The Earle Brown Days Committee has not requested any specific amount of
contribution for City participation in the Year 2000 celebration they have proposed.
SOCIAL SERVICE
Social Service /Joint Powers is included in the proposed budget at $79,860. The City Council's
allocation of funding is set forth in the narrative sheet for the social service activities. ( #435,
Social Services)
CAPITAL ITEMS IN THE GENERAL FUND
The fire department is requesting an additional $10,000 for the replacement of the salvage truck
above the accumulated depreciation.
The budget also includes $9,000 for new aerials of the city that were last done in 1989. $14,000
is included for the special assessment against park property for the Bellvue project. $5,500 is
included for special fencing behind hockey goals to protect persons in the area. $20,000 is
included to replace the large copier at City Hall. A one time purchase cost is included in
Recreation for software that is currently provided by Logis. This will result in a substantial net
decrease in 2000 for the recreation software costs.
FIVE YEAR PROJECTIONS
As discussed in August, most departments have projected minor fluctuations in expenditure
requests that would need to be accounted for only in inflationary changes in the budget. Public
Safety continues to make rather substantial projections for major personnel and equipment
additions. Of concern also is the need to adjust our capital transfers for street construction etc. to
Page 10
provide for real growth. Revenues will need to increase upon the lifting of levy limits to keep up
with current programs, fund future capital projects, and to dle extent justified to or desired by the
Council, expand service provision. In the Enterprise Funds, 5 year plans are in place for Water,
Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Sewer. A 5 year capital improvement plan is also in place.
TRANSFERS FOR STREET PROJECTS
The level of transfers to the Special Assessment Construction Fund for street projects is level at
$394,197. This amount will need to be increased in future budgets to keep the program going.
YEAR 2000 AND CONTINGENCY
As indicated, the study currently going forward will help identify remaining year 2000 issues as
will the planning in 1999. The contingency fund would be the source of additional year 2000 issue
- resolution assistance as needs are identified.
The contingency fund contains $131,064. Preliminarily a portion of that must be reserved for
potential increases in health contribution by the City. This contingency represents less than 1 %
of the General fund budget.
II. ENTERPRISE, AND OTHER FUND
EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER
The 1999 budget for operations projects continued operational self - sufficiency and some capital
investment. The 1999 budget reflects additional space to be completed with a grant from the State
of Minnesota. Anticipated completion of the new building and associated connectors and
remodeling is late Spring of 1999. The funding for trade shows and directed sales for conferences
is continued.
The Inn on the Farm continues to be a financial drag on the operations. The 1999 budget increases
advertising to test whether an increase in advertising can ameliorate the losses in operating the Inn.
Heritage Center staff still feel that the Inn is an overall asset to the operation of the core
conference and meeting business, which is profitable.
The change in property tax class rates has negatively impacted the cash flow in the tax increment
district that was used to construct the facility. That has complicated the process of evaluation
options for this enterprise.
EARLE BROWN TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT
As indicated, changes in tax capacity rates adopted by the Legislature have negatively impacted
this district. The City's financial advisor is monitoring the situation and will have more specific
y g P
Page 11
projections and proposals when final information is available for Hennepin County.
• WATER, SEWER AND STORM SEWER FUNDS
These enterprise funds, pursuant to the 5 year plans, are anticipated to cash flow operations and
capital needs with modest rate increases. The 1999 budget includes the adopted increases in sewer
and storm sewer rates. Modest increases were adopted to maintain the fiscal health of these funds.
GOLF FUND
The golf course budget continues providing sufficient funds for its operations from operating
revenues. The plan adopted by the City Council in 1998 is continued with its scheduled repayment
of the principal on the construction loans. This 20 year plan creates sufficient capital reserves to
address equipment replacement issues and pay down the principle on the original construction
loan. Performance of the Golf Course was strong in 1998, but a substantial portion of the Spring
-was lost due to the construction of the storm water project on the Golf Course. Several
contingencies were discussed with the City Council to address the lost revenue during
construction, since the construction was unrelated to the Golf Course itself. As the estimates of
year end revenues have continued to be refined as we have gotten closer to the end of the year,
it is anticipated that the full $50,000 principle payment due in 1998 will be paid. This will result
in a positive cash balance, but at a reduced level. Unless there would be an unforeseen event (such
as a system failure: ie: water line collapse), the Golf Course Fund should be able to function on
those reserves through 1999. A normal year in 1999 should put the fund on good footing.
LIQUOR FUND
The budget reflects continuing operations at the same level and configuration as 1998. Issues
remain in determining a long range strategy for this fund. Two facilities are leased and plans must
be made regarding the future of those locations and configuration.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
The revenues from the Housing & Redevelopment Authority are transferred to the Economic
Development Authority to carry out the redevelopment and housing purposes. The Economic
Development Authority's budget remains essentially unchanged. In 1999, the 53rd Avenue project
will continue. The budget does not reflect the cost of house construction and the offsetting revenue
for house sales. The two items will offset each other and it was not recommended that the budget
reflect increases that will not be ongoing.
SUMMARY
• The proposed budget continues a return to a format that states expenditures in a fashion that is
easier to track, places all general fund tax revenues in the General Fund, allocates most full -time
Page 12
employees as full persons within departments, reduces the number of divisions greatly, uses line -
item detail, and provides more information regarding the planned use of monies than the previous
budget. The budget reflects City Council goals and direction.
In the General Fund, levy limits have negatively impacted planning for the future, as revenues are
uncertain, while costs of current service delivery continues to rise at a rate in excess of revenue
growth. While wages are a major component of the increased costs, those wages reflect delivering
the City services they represent. Pressure on wages is a national phenomenon associated with a
robust economy that, in Minnesota, has basically eliminated unemployment. The area of
information systems personnel is so competitive as to make recruitment and retention of employees
extremely difficult.
I would like to thank the many staff members who participated in the revision of the budget
presentation and process, especially the work of Finance Director Charlie Hansen, Assistant
Finance Director Tim Johnson and City Clerk Sharon Knutson.
. Page 13
General Fund 12/11/98
Code 1996 1997 1998 1999 IYR Change
GENERAL
City council $127,800 $126,089 $123,711 $120,603 -2.51 ($3,108);
Administration $243,065 $198,283 $200,219 $191,415 - 4.40 %', ($8,804)1
Human Resources $109,036 $166,728 $165,069 $166,239 0.71% 1 $1,170
City Clerk $47,508 $48,397 $69,279 $70,855 2.27% i $1,576
Elections $47,508 $48,397 $69,088 $57,1661 - 17.26% ($11,922)s
Finance $182,678 $384,563 $412,411 $414,774 j 0.57% $2,363
Data Processing $354,348 $241,451 $222,719 $228,006 j 2.37% 1 $5,287
Legal $199,700 $201,400 $198,400 $197,900 - 0.25% i ($500)1
TOTAL: $1,311,643 $1,415,308 $1,460,896 $1,446,9581 - 0.95% ($13,938)1
POLICE
Patrol $2,647,340 $2,653,301 $2,709,132 $2,796,754 3.23% $87,622
Investigation $540,915 $588,580 $579,855 $544,099 - 6.17% ($35,756),
Support Services 418 $715,851 $821,989 $840,719 $937,341 ' 11.49% $96,622 '
Chief 419 '$137,127 $157295 $146,786 $131,9661 - 10.10% ($14,820)
TOTAL: $4,041,233 $4,221,165 $4,276,492 $4,410,160 3.13% $133,668
FIRE
Fire 425 $651,896 $603,820 $594,271 $592,737 - 0.26% ($1,534);
Emergency Prep. 426 $38,792 $ _ $47,849 $47,184 -1.39% ($665)f
TOTAL: $691688 $655,691 $642,120 $639,921 - 0.34% ! ($2,199)'
� I
COMMUNITY DEV,
Inspections 430 $317,258 $229,633 $261,724 $268,174 ! 2.46% $6,450
Planning & Zoning 431 $116,180 $111,107 $110,712 - 0.36 %� ($395)
Assessing 432 $214,847 $247,358 $261,592 $262,620 0.39% $1,028
TOTAL: $532,105 $593,171 $634,423 $641,506; 1.12% $7,083
Conv. & Tourism 433 $228,000 $206,570 $218,500 $261,250 19.57% $42,750
Social Sevices $78,547 $80,000 $80,104 $79,860 ; -0.30% ($244)11
BUILDINGS
Police Station Maint. $57,3481 $57,348
Custodial Services 440 $67,124 $49,964 $55,041 $60,329 9.61% $5,288
Bldg. Maint. 441 $267,064 $297,469 $371,502 $398,616 7.30% 1 1 $27,114
Govt. Bldg ground 442 $41952 $65,364 $60,9021 - 6.83% ($4,462)1
TOTAL: $334,188 $390,385 $491,907 $577,195 17.34 %' $85,288
PUBLIC WORDS
Engineering 443 $134,560 $369,546 $380,104 $429,363 12.96 %! $49,259
Pub. Works Admin 444 $218,477 $194,025 $195,329 $204,4341 4.66% $9,105 j
Street Maint. 445 $568,094 $919,751 $941,086 $897,028 1 -4.68% ($44,058)1
Traffic control 446 $174,948 $163,747 $174,55 $181,746: 4.12% 1 $7,191 i
Snow &Ice 447 $291,938 $183,161 $191,092 $200,403 4.87 %' $9,311
Street Lighting 448 $147,301 $139,000 $134,000 $134,500 0.37% $500
Parks Maint 449 $426,560 $348290 $302,388 $311,393 i 2.98% $9,005
Park Fac. Maint 450 $221,342 $267,630 $275,881 $276,930 ! 0.38 % $1,049
Maint. Rec. Prog 451 $100,695 $53,026 $61,209 $64,195 j 4.88% 1 $2,986
Forestry 452 $109,611 $103,866 $106,829 $109,419 2.42 % $2,590
Ice & Hockey 454 $62,966 $90,777 $93,765 $102,541 1 9.36% $8,776
$2,456,492 $2,837,819 $2,856,238 $2,911,952 1.95% I $55,714
CARS
CARS Admin $135,786 $135,786
Rec. Admin 460 $400,701 $433,630 $322,080 1 ($111,550)x;
Adult Rec 461 $459,426 $273,683 $249,490 $234,223 - 6.12% ($15,267)!,
Teen Programs 462 $24,203 $12,892 $12,966 $18,077 39.42% 1 $5,111I�
Youth Rec. 463 $165,190 $109,644 $109,942 $108,092] - 1.68 % ($1,850)!
General Rec. 464 $114,859 $56,813 $53,924 $55,088 2.16% $1,164
Community Cen. 465 $427,732 $275,162 $225,580 $244,418 8.35% $18,838
Pool 466 $342,183 $332.259 $239,673 $249,848 4.25% $10,175
$1,533,593 $1,461,154 $1,325,205 $1,367,612 3.20 %' $42,407''.
MISCELLANEOUS
RiskMgmt. 470 $160,725 $167,000 $157,000 $152,500 - 2.87 % ($4,500),
Central Supplies/ 471 $281961 $251,200 $375,369 $362,059' -3.55% ($13,310).
Civic Events 472 $10 $1,500 $6,425 $6,459 0.53% $34
Reimbursement Other Funds
474 ($699,141) ($715,538) ($737,487)', 3.07% ($21,949)'
Transfers (debt) 475 $244,281 $1,378,425 $1,384,971 0.47 %', $6,546
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
SUMMARY OF FULL TIME EMPLOYEE POSITIONS
PROPOSED 1999 BUDGET
Authorized Budget
DIVISION 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Administration 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 3.4 "
Human Resources /Purchasing 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
City Clerk 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Elections 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Finance 8.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Data processing 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Patrol 34.0 34.0 34.0 33.0 33.0
Investigation 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Support Services 14.0 14.0 14.0 15.0 15.0
Office of the Chief 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Fire 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Inspections 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Planning & Zoning 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Assessing 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Police Station Maintenance 1.0
Custodial Services 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Building Maintenance 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Grounds Maintenance 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Engineering Services 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0
Public Services Administration 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Streets Maintenance 5.0 5.0 5.9 5.9 5.9
Traffic Control 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Snow & Ice Control 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Parks Grounds Maintenance 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Parks Facilities Maintenance 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Maint for Recreation Programs 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Forestry 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Ice /Hockey Rinks 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
CARS Administration 2.0 2.0
Recreation Administration 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 4.0
Community Center 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Pool 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 122.5 127.4 128.3 128.3 132.3
Economic Development Authority 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Liquor Stores 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Centerbrook Golf Course 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Earle Brown Heritage Center
Administration 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Convention Center 5.8 5.8 5.8 8.0 8.0
Inn on the Farm 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.0
TOTAL E.B.H.C. 11.0 11.0 11.0 13.0 13.0
Water Utility Fund 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0
Sanitary Sewer Fund 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0
Central Garage Fund 6.0 6.0 5.1 5.1 5.1
TOTAL FULL TIME EMPLOYEES 153.0 158.0 158.0 160.0 164.0
Position authorized in 1998 budget and to be filled in 1999.
forwarMpersonnl 11/30/98 2:00 PM
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
• RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL TAX CAPACITY LEVY FOR THE
PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COST OF OPERATION, PROVIDING
INFORMATIONAL SERVICE, AND RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF MSA 469.001 THROUGH 469.047 OF
THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF
BROOKLYN CENTER FOR THE YEAR. 1999
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center is the governing body
of the City of Brooklyn Center; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a resolution from the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center entitled a "Resolution Establishing the
Final Tax Levy for the Brooklyn Center Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the Year
1999"; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota statutes currently require certification of a final tax levy
to the Hennepin County Auditor on or before December 27, 1998; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to the provisions of MSA 469.033,
Subdivision 6, must by resolution consent to the final tax levy of the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that a special tax be levied upon all real and personal property within the City
of Brooklyn Center at the rate of 0.0144% of taxable market value of all taxable property, real and
personal, situated within the corporate limits of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota and not
exempted by the Constitution of the State of Minnesota or the valid laws of the State of Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the said property tax levy be used for the
operation of the Brooklyn Center housing and Redevelopment Authority pursuant to the provision
of MSA 469.001 through 469.047.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
• and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
i RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A FINAL TAX LEVY FOR 1999
APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE GENERAL FUND, THE DEBT SERVICE
FUNDS. THE E.D FIND AND THE H. R.A. FUND BUDGETS
WHEREAS, The City of Brooklyn Center is annually required by Charter and state law
to approve a resolution setting forth an annual tax levy to Hennepin County; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota statutes require certification of a final tax levy to Hennepin County
on or before December 27, 1998.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn
Center as follows:
1. There is hereby levied upon all taxable property lying within the City of Brooklyn Center,
a proposed tax levy of the following sums for the purpose indicated:
GENERAL FUND (without debt) $6,514,597
STREET IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE -94 70,165
STREET IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE -95 70,844
STREET IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE -96 123,006
POLICE & FIRE BUILDING DEBT SERVICE 784.692
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $7,563,304
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 194,898
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 138,656
$7,896,858
2. The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this resolution to be certified to Hennepin County so
that said sum shall be spread upon the tax rolls and will be payable in the year 1999.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
. its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1999 PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE
GENERAL FIND
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is annually required by Charter and state
law to adopt an annual budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that the appropriations for budgeted funds for the calendar year 1999 shall be:
1. APPROPRIATIONS:
GENERAL FUND:
Organizational Unit
General Government $1,446,958
Public Safety 5,050,081
Community Development 641,506
Convention & Tourism 261,250
Social Services 79,860
Public Works 2,624,669
Parks 864,478
Recreation 1,367,612
Risk Management 152,500
Contingency 131,064
Central Supplies & Support 230,995
Civic Events 6,459
Reimbursements from Other Funds - 737,487
Transfers to Capital Projects Funds 394,197
Transfers to Street Debt Service Funds 243,449
Transfers to Police & Fire Debt Service Fund 747,325
---------------
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $13,504,916
• RESOLUTION NO.
2. ESTIMATED REVENUES:
GENERAL FUND:
General Property Taxes $7,309,933
Special Assessments 1,000
Sales Taxes on Lodging 550,000
Licenses & Permits 414,270
Intergovernmental Revenue 3,889,507
General Government Services Charges 23,000
Public Safety Service Charges 23,050
Recreation Fees 816,156
Fines & Forfeitures 186,000
Miscellaneous Revenue 292,000
---------------
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE BY SOURCE $13,504,916
•
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the g adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded b member
p � .. Y Y
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the followin g g voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
• its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1999 PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR THE
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is required by Charter and state law to
adopt an annual budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that the budgets for the following funds for the year 1999 shall be:
SPECIAL REVENUE ESTIMATED
FUNDS REVENUES: APPROPRIATIONS:
Housing & Redevelopment Auth. $152,800 $152,800
Economic Development Authority $756,660 $756,660
Earle Brown Tax Increment Distr. $1,226,212 $1,332,000
Tax Increment Distr. #3 $1,308,002 $759,801
Community Dev Block Grant $240,809 $240,809
------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - --
TOTAL $3,684,483 $3,242,070
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1999 PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR THE
CAPITAL PROJFKT,S FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is required by Charter and state law to
adopt an annual budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that the budgets for the following funds for the year 1999 shall be:
CAPITAL PROJECTS ESTIMATED
FUNDS REVENUES: APPROPRIATIONS:
Capital Reserve Emergency Fund $60,000
Capital Improvements Fund $2,977,159 $7,419,700
M.S.A. Construction Fund $874,736 $1,536,616
Special Assessment Construction $1,637,537 $2,052,835
------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - --
TOTAL $5,549,432 $11,009,151
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1999 PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR THE
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is required by Charter and state law to
adopt an annual budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that the budgets for the Enterprise Funds for the year 1999 shall be:
OPERATIONS: ESTIMATED
REVENUES: APPROPRIATIONS:
Liquor Stores $3,152,350 $3,106,657
Centerbrook Golf Course $356,468 $322,934
Earle Brown Heritage Center $3,087,000 $2,988,902
Water Utility $1,350,616 $1,163,954
Sanitary Sewer $2,465,630 $2,109,662
Storm Drainage $1,025,961 $493,092
Recycling $212.000 $212.000
TOTAL $11,650,025 $10,397,201
• CONSTRUCTION: APPROPRIATIONS:
Liquor Stores $5,000
Centerbrook Golf Course $13,000
Earle Brown Heritage Center $92,750
Water Utility $803,700
Sanitary Sewer $1,003,270
Storm Drainage $502.945
TOTAL $2,420,665
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
its adoption: Member introduced the following resolution and moved
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1999 PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR THE
INTERNAI, SERVICE FTJNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is required by Charter and state law to
adopt an annual budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that the budgets for the following funds for the year 1999 shall be:
INTERNAL SERVICE ESTIMATED
FUNDS REVENUES: APPROPRIATIONS:
Public Employees Retirement $60,000 $60,000
Central Garage $2,026,890 $2,026,890
------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - --
TOTAL $2,086,890 $2,086,890
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
City Council Agenda Item No. 8a
s
•
MEMO
•
To: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager j
From: Ronald A. Warren, iali CA .
arr , Planning J and Zoning t s
Subject: City Council Consideration Item - Planning Commission Application No. 98027
Date: December 9, 1998
On the December 14, 1998 City Council Agenda is Planning Commission Application No.
98027 submitted by William Vetter and Robert Peterson requesting a variance from the platting
ordinance to allow a division of land by metes and bounds description rather than by a formal
plat.
Attached for your review are copies of the Planning Commission Information Sheet for
Planning Commission Application No. 98027 and also an area map showing the location of the
property under consideration, the Planning Commission minutes relating to the Commission's
consideration of this matter and other supporting documents.
•
This matter was considered by the Planning Commission at their December 3, 1998 meeting
and was recommended for approval.
It is recommended that the City Council, following consideration of this matter, approve the
application subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission.
Application Filed on 1 1 -16 -98
City Council Action Should Be
i Taken By 1 -15 -99 (64 Days)
Planning Commission Informatian Sheet
Application No. 98027
Applicant: William Vetter and Robert Peterson
Location: South Side of 68th Avenue No, Between Camden Avenue No & 5th Street No
Request: Variance (Subdivision by Metes and Bounds Description)
The applicants, William Vetter and Robert Peterson, who reside at 6736 Camden Avenue North
and 6737 5th Street North respectively, are requesting a variance to allow a subdivision of land
by metes and bounds description rather than by a formal plat.
The property they are proposing to divide is an approximate 90 ft. x 141 ft. undeveloped, but
buildable, lot addressed as 507 68th Avenue North. The lot is located on the south side of 68th
Avenue and lies between the two lots owned by the applicants. The property in question is zoned
R -1 (One Family Residence) and is surrounded on the east, south and west by single family
homes and on the north by a half street dedication for 68th Avenue North with vacant single
family zoned property on the opposite side of that street. The applicants have jointly acquired
this property from Hennepin County and wish to divide it equally so that it can be combined with
their properties.
The current legal descriptions of the properties involved in this request are Lots 2, 3 & 4, Block
e 1, Bing's Addition No. 2 with each lot being approximately 90 ft. x 140 ft. Lot 2 is 6737 5th
Street North (Peterson property); Lot 3 is 507 68th Avenue North (vacant property jointly owned
by applicants); and Lot 4 is 6736 Camden Avenue North (Vetter property). Their proposal is to
divide the lot in half with a north/south split which would allow them to add an approximate 45
ft. x 140 ft. area to their respective properties.
A certificate of survey has been prepared for the applicants showing the division of land
proposed, which when filed would create two parcels, Parcel A and Parcel B which would be
described as follows:
Proposed Parcel A - Lot 4, and the west half of Lot 3, Bing's Addition No. 2
Proposed Parcel B - Lot 2, and the east half of Lot 3, Bing's Addition No. 2
This division/combination would allow the applicants separate ownership of this property rather
to continue to oven this lot in common. Parcel A, the Vetter parcel, would be approximately 135
ft. x 141 ft. and Parcel B, the Peterson parcel, would be approximately 135 ft. x 141 ft.
Under the City's Subdivision Ordinance, divisions of land are to be performed by plat or
12 -3 -98
i Page 1
registered land survey unless the City Council shall by variance allow otherwise. Section 15-112
of the subdivision, or platting, ordinance authorizes the council to grant variances from their
regulations when, in its opinion, undue hardship may result from strict compliance. In making
its findings, the council shall take into consideration the nature of the proposed use of land, the
existing use of land in the vicinity, the number of persons to reside or work in the proposed
subdivision and the probable effect of the proposed subdivision upon traffic conditions in the
vicinity. To grant a variance, the council shall- find: 1. That there are special circumstances or
conditions affecting said property such that strict application of the provisions of this ordinance
would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his/her land. 2. That the variance is
necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the petitioner. 3.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property in the territory in which said property is situated.
The applicant's contention is that to require the formal platting process for the division they
propose is overly expensive, burdensome and unnecessary in that no new legal lots are being
created with this division of land.
The staff would concur with the applicant's request and in this case we do believe the standards
for variance can be met. Also, there is much precedent for the granting of metes and bounds
division variances. Such variances were quite common prior to 1978. Since that time, at least
four such divisions have been approved through the variance process by the City Council. The
most recent being one for Joseph Lampe and Ernee McArthur under Planning Commission
Application No. 98018 on September 28, 1998. The variances that have been granted typically
site the right of the property owner to divide his /her property and the hardship of bearing full
platting costs to divide the property by plat. Also, the division of land by metes and bounds have
been allowed provided that; 1. No new buildable lots were being created; 2. That the
underlying land is platted property; and 3. That no lot or setback variances are implied and that
all lot area requirements will be met.
In our opinion, the proposed metes and bounds description variance requested by the applicants
appears to meet both the variance standards contained in Section 15 -112 of the city ordinances
and also the City's policy regarding the division of land by metes and bounds descriptions.
A public hearing has been scheduled and notices to surrounding property owners have been sent.
RECOMMENDATION
Again, it is believed that the standards for variance and the City's policy regarding subdivisions
by metes and bounds descriptions have been met. Therefore, approval of this application is
recommended noting the above findings and subject to at least the following conditions:
I. The le g al descriptions and surv showin � the division of Lot ), Block 1, Bin v s
12 -3 -98
Page 2
Addition No. 2 shall be filed with Hennepin County.
2. Once these legal descriptions have been established, the City Assessor is authorized
to allow the combination of the divided property to the adjacent Lot 2 and Lot 4,
Bing's Addition No. 2 for tax purposes.
12 -3 -98
Page 3
_ .. ... ........ . _. ���, ` � � �_ u \ `\ \ U��' • ..., 3u A113
y b
1 FI 'Y, „u
Yl A0111A
OW 31YOV3AIY _ _ I f \ - y A0111A ! -
• 'S 'QY 31YOY3nI}Il
QY Sv17Y0 < { I - '< Yl MAl1Ix
/ ...
SY1lY0 �. � ` d S3'1 _ .��_.� -4: �
• i F
QY Y3tilY J1 f �• O ......
fy I Y�.nJ� ��
e'V z
5111. AVE. N. _ - ,q � AVE
N 3AY NLS 1 C % 4;-�� 1
1 O T• ^ dil35rr C"Ert i
� , .,
'N '3AV _ f+3arrJ _ �,�' bA '.►..� --- x t nvE. N. N ' -T I N
JAY N3?fr0 - 'fir` ` / �'`` �'` � •.r (� Lys < (��j�� x(/ r�
001 JtiY 101W tY I -- ,• '�,X� <,.'
✓`
:l�V mY Uti NN . t1. { 111 111 -{ -�
u 3�Y UN AN9 _ — TL - _ - - - 11�-' Y X` J'()o - -
-- �� >`�
�t � - - -
AY M IMI - m N � � s t _ � - DU 11
N 3
I - -� _ • �.� -�� � 1 ���- ���LJJJ LLLLLL •N '3AY 1)pdn
oot t D
� _•-- _ H. fl ururt AVE. �`�. '•
- t
llDdf10
I — � 71Y�, • {--} 17 -' '3nY 110511 ` ,t JAV 1 u
OO11 �y ly�asut A vE. 14. - -� (�_1 -� r pgl a�
, 3AY Ir1SY3t3 I — ! 3AY p+FJ150i Gi -
x 3AV U>J1(3Y!
, 31v ll✓<]'E3Y! 1 z "N '35Y llKx1311! I t= 1�3��e J . � •3AY OUY11I- - -
[N
N 35Y OVYM o 'N 'JAT71-21 ._ �-- A 1 U
�t — _ j H T � ..
3.iY to1091YY1 t+wp?EDt� Q
000i f —_ _.x —• - }tnvtllc Avt
N 3AY ONIAYI 1 _ �� f 3AY� I tnet = - - -Q ,y "1 �uES ctn.
, N.
N 3AY S3vr
J"CS AVE. 11. Qj
__ -> —'— :� < l '`�•
N 3AY x of" V - lTf-M trlj N. �� - -� ,\, _Z TT — l " 1 N �,I s
N JAY NYpo, AVE. LOGMI
1 �_I l lz rSllItiGlE ���r�r.
� I �� r Iunlr�
58 TH A VE.
f W (�� 3
Parcel A p B
1
Cn
. T
r35. oo V)
35-29 A4L.CS.-,
133.00
�lz DESCRIPTION
LctD 2.3 and 4-, Block 1, BING'S
ADD INO. 2, Hennepin County, Minn.
PROPO!�T-D L PARCEL A
Lct -, and the West Hall of Lot 3,
BING'S ADDi7GIN NO. 2, Hennepin Count Minn.
PROPOSED DESCRIPTION PARCE;_j the East 'E: Exiting b
Lot cm- t HcIf of Lot 3,
" AD DITION NO. ) 2. N OT
BING'S 11\ Hennepin County, Minn.
on sub3ect site not shown.
NoR THA7 71jIS pt SPECIFICATION,
110N.
OR :Z�
-CRT W,LS EjY VF OR u 405R my DIPEC
0 60 SUPT =%,jS;C AND - THAT I AM A DULY R-
PR ' l
CF� LAqD SUR UNDER TIHE LAMS SCA LE N FEET C C- 2
!!77;.1. OF JININP�
• D-_tnot-s Iron Monument Found
C 0�rotes lrc-n Monument Set f(h ZJ� FE"
A&ftw 001 ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDWSION
Tor: E301 Vetter
R CIT-en ccr-CaN s-: tier 15, 1996
C-CsSI-L77,4C =-,GNeZc8 A116700j",
T-- P.22
November 16, 1998
Dear Planning Commission Members:
We, William Vetter from 6736 Camden lot 4 block 1 Bings Addition no 2, and
Robert Peterson from 6737 -5th Street Lot 2 block 1 Bings Addition no 2 , request
consideration of variance to do a meets and bounds. Please review this at your
next meeting.
We have purchased Lot 3 Block 1 Bing's Addition No. 2. We would like to do a
administrative subdivision. The new property description would then be Lot 4 and
west half of Lot 3 Bing's Addition No. 2. Lot 2 and east half of Lot 3 Bing's
Addition No. 2.
We have done field survey, set the new corner, and prepared certificates with new
legals with: Howard Green Company, Consulting Engineers, 1326 Energy Park
Drive, St. Paul, NN 55108, (612) -644 -4389.
Thank you for your consideration.
William J. Vetter
�,bbert Pet „son
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HEN'INEPIN AND THE STATE OF ivINNESOTA
SPECIAL SESSION
DECEMBER 03, 1998
CALL TO ORDER
The Planning Commission special session was called to order by Chair Willson at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Chair Tim Willson, Commissioners Graydon Boeck, Stephen Erdmann, Ed Nelson, Rex Newman,
and Dianne Reem were present. Also present were Secretary to the Planning Commission/Planning
and Zoning Specialist Ronald Warren, Planning Commission Recording Secretary Arlene Bergfalk.
Commissioner Sean Rahn was absent.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 12. 1998
There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Newman, to approve the
minutes of the November 12, 1998 meeting as submitted. The motion passed unanimously with
Commissioner Erdmann abstaining.
CHAIR'S EXPLANATION
. Chair Willson explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the
Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the
Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final
decisions in these matters.
WILLIAM VETTER AND ROBERT PETERSON - APPLICAT NO. 98027 - SUBDIVISION
VARIANCE
Chair Willson introduced Application No. 98027, a variance request to allow a lot at 507 -68th
Avenue North to be subdivided by metes and bounds description rather than by formal plat. This
application is submitted by William Vetter, 6736 Camden Avenue North and Robert Peterson, 6737-
5th Street North. This application was filed on 11 -16 -98 requiring City Council action by 01 -15 -99
(60 days).
Mr. Warren presented the staff report and used transparencies to describe the location of the three
R -1 zoned lots and the proposed subdivision of the 507 -68th Avenue North lot. (See attached
Planning Commission Application Information Sheet dated 12- 03 -98.) The property to be
subdivided is an undeveloped, 90'x 141' buildable lot jointly owned by the applicants. The lot will
be split in half, north/south.. allowing the applicants to each add an approximate 45'x 140' area to
their respective properties. The certificate of survey shows the division of the jointly owned lot and
the combination with the individually owned lots into Parcel A (Vetter) and Parcel B (Peterson).
The newly created parcels will be approximately the same size, 135 feet x 141 feet.
12 -03 -98 1
The applicants request that they be granted a variance from the Subdivision Ordinance to divide the
jointly owned lot by metes and bounds description rather than by registered land survey or by plat.
Messrs. Vetter and Peterson contend that requiring a formal platting process for this division is
overly expensive, burdensome and unnecessary since the land is platted properly and no lot or
setback variances are required.
Section 15 -112 of the ordinance authorizes granting a variance based on certain considerations and
specific findings. Mr. Warren explained that staff review of the application finds that it satisfies the
criteria required and clearly falls within precedents set for granting metes and bounds division
variances to avoid unnecessary work and cost. Therefore, Mr. Warren recommended approval of
Application No. 98027 subject to 2 conditions outlined in the staff report. Surrounding property
owners were notified of the public hearing to be held on this application at this meeting.
Chair Willson called for questions from the Commissioners. Commissioner Boeck inquired how
the applicants acquired the property. Mr. Warren stated the lot was a tax forfeited property. He
noted that the lot is buildable, however, deficiencies including roadway access and utilities
discouraged the previous owner from use of the property and it was subsequently purchased by the
applicants. In response to Commissioner Nelson's question regarding zoning across the street, Mr.
Warren indicated there is vacant R -1 property on the opposite side of the street and described the
status of other adjacent properties in that area.
PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICATION NO. 98027
There was a motion by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by Commissioner Erdmann, to open the
public hearing at 7:48 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
Chair Willson called for comments from the public.
Messrs. Vetter and Peterson, the applicants, explained that because of the orientation of their homes
on their lots, splitting the lot in question will enlarge their side and back yards. In addition to making
their individual lots more valuable and attractive, their homes could also be enlarged. The vacant
lot has been maintained by the applicants over the years. The applicants wish to avoid payment of
taxes on the lot by filing the certificate of survey and completion of quit claim procedures before
January 1, 1999.
No other individuals from the public appeared before the Commission during the public hearing on
Application No. 98027.
CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Reem, to close the public
hearing on Application No. 98027 at 7:52 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
Chair Willson called for additional questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners
interposed no objections to approval of Application No. 98027.
ACTION RECOLIhI APPROVAL OF APPLI CATION Nn. 98027 - WILT VETTER
AND ROBERT PETERSON - SUBDIVTSION VARIANCE
There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Erdmann, to recommend
to the Council that it approve Application No. 98027, a request for a variance to allow a subdivision
12 -03 -98 2
of land by metes and bounds description rather than by a formal plat, submitted by William Vetter
and Robert Peterson, noting that the standards for variance and the City's policy regarding
subdivisions by metes and bounds descriptions have been met subject to the following conditions:
1. The legal descriptions and survey showing the division of Lot 3, Block 1, Bing's
Addition No. 2 shall be filed with Hennepin County.
2. Once these legal descriptions have been established, the City Assessor is authorized
to allow the combination of the divided property to the adjacent Lot 2 and Lot 4,
Bing's Addition No. 2 for tax purposes.
Votin in favor: Chair Willson, Commissioners Boeck, Erdmann, Nelson, Newman, and
Reem. The motion passed unanimously.
The Council will consider the recommendation at its December 14, 1998 meeting. The applicant
must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will
require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration.
OTHER BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS - NONE
FUTURE MEETING DATES
The next meeting of the Planning Commission will be on Thursday, December 17, in conjunction
with a joint meeting with the Council. Mr. Warren briefly reviewed the Commission's business
agenda and the matters which may be discussed with the Councilmembers at that meeting.
Meeting dates are tentatively set for Thursday, January 14 and January 28, 1999. After Council
meeting dates are set for 1999, the Commission schedule will be available.
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Commissioner Erdmann, seconded by Commissioner Newman, to adjourn
the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:00
p.m.
Chair
Recorded and transcribed by:
Arlene Bergfalk
Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
12 -03 -98 3
City Council Agenda Item No. 9a
•
•
City Council Agenda Item No. 9b
•
•
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 8, 1998
TO: Michael McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Jim Glasoe, Director of Community Activities, Recreation and Services
SUBJECT: Resolution Expressing Appreciation for the Gift of the Brooklyn Center Women's
Club in Support of the Annual Kid's Shopping Korner Activity
The Brooklyn Center Women's Club has presented to the City a donation of three hundred
dollars ($300) and has designated that it be used for the Kid's Shopping Korner activity.
s
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
® its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR THE GIFT OF THE BROOKLYN
CENTER WOMEN'S CLUB IN SUPPORT OF THE ANNUAL KID'S SHOPPING
KORNER ACTIVITY
WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Women's Club has presented to the City a
donation of three hundred dollars ($300) and has designated that it be used for the annual Kid's
Shopping Korner activity; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is appreciative of the donation and commends the
Brooklyn Center Women's Club for its civic efforts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota:
1. Acknowledges the donation with g ratitude.
. 2. Appropriates the donation to the special events program.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
City Council Agenda Item No. 9c
City of Brooklyn Center
Proposed 1999 City Council Meeting Schedule
• Informal Open Forum with City Council begins at 6:45 p.m. in Conference Room B (B)
Regular Session City Council Business meeting begins at 7:00 p.m, in Council Chambers (CC)
JANUARY JULY
11 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B) 12 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B)
11 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC) 12 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC)
25 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B) 26 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B)
25 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC) 26 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC)
FEBRUARY
8 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B) AUGUST
8 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC) 9 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B)
22 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B) 9 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC)
22 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC) 16 - Work Session, 7 p.m. (B)
23 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B)
MARCH 23 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC)
8 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B) 30 - Work Session, 7 p.m. (B)
8 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC)
22 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B) SEPTEMBER
22 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC) 13 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B)
29 - Work Session w /Commission Chairs, 7 p.m. (B) 13 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC)
27 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B)
APRIL 27 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC)
12 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B)
• 12 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC) OCTOBER
19 - Commission Recognition, 7 p.m. (B) 11 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B)
26 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B) 11 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC)
26 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC) 18 - Work Session, 7 p.m. (B)
25 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B)
MAY 25 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC)
3 - Board of Equalization, 7 p.m. (CC)
10 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B) NOVEMBER
10 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC) 1 - Work Session, 7 p.m. (B)
17 - Work Session, 7 p.m. (B) 8 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B)
24 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B) 8 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC)
24 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC) 15 - Work Session, 7 p.m. (B)
22 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B)
JUNE 22 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (C)
14 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B)
14 - Regular Session, 7 p.m (CC) DECEMBER
28 - Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B) 13 -.Open Forum, 6:45 p.m. (B)
28 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC) 13 - Regular Session, 7 p.m. (CC)
I
-
City Council Agenda Item No. 9d
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 8, 1998
TO: Michael McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Jim Glasoe, Director of Community Activities, Recreation and Services
Diane Spector, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Commission Report - Community Meetings Regarding Park
P Y b
Improvements
Attached, please find the Park and Recreation Commission's report regarding the community
meetings they hosted in September, October and November of this year regarding park
improvements.
Included in the report is a brief introduction, an individual meeting summary and the
Commission's final recommendations that were developed early this month. The Commission
worked diligently to generate this report and recommendations so that the City Council might
have it for review prior to their consideration and adoption of the 1999 General Fund budget and
Capital Improvements Program.
If you have any questions, or would like additional information, please let us know.
•
Community Meetings
Regarding Park
1 m prove ents
•
Prepared, for
Brooklyn Center City Council
by
Brooklyn Center Parks and Recreation Commission
•
November 23, 1998
Table of Contents
Introduction.................................. ............................... 1
September 16, 1998 Meeting ..................... ............................... 3
October ?0,1998 Meeting ...................................................... 6
November 17,1998 Meeting ..................... ............................... 8
Recommendations............................ ............................... 11
Introduction
The Brooklyn Center parks system is comprised of a variety of improved parks,
unimproved parks, special use parks and open spaces. These parks are intended to serve
the recreational needs of the population of Brooklyn Center by their location and the
varied amenities they contain. A master parks plan was first developed in 1955 -57 and
guided the initial development of the parks. These parks were further developed and
improved according to the parks classification system that was developed in 1976 and
revised in 1987.
The Brooklyn Center park system is in the process of being systematically renovated and
updated. A thorough review of park facilities has been completed and a plan for
improvements has been developed. This plan anticipates the continued use of operating
capital to make improvements such as minor equipment replacement, trail repair, minor
shelter building repair and minor repair of other park improvements.
Major improvements such as playground replacement, shelter building replacement,
parking lot improvements, etc. would be financed through the Capital Improvements
Fund.
The revised Comprehensive Plan which was completed this year includes a modification
of the park classification system. It is this modified classification system on which the
parks' Capital Improvements Plan has been developed.
So as to promote public understanding of this revised classification system and to solicit
input regarding long -term improvements, the Parks and Recreation Commission hosted a
series of three community meetings on park improvements.
These community meetings generally consisted of.
• a short report on the revised classification system and what it means for various parks
• a review of the proposed improvements contained in the Capital Improvements Plan
• solicitation of input on the classification system
• solicitation of input on the general outline of proposed improvements
• solicitation of input on specific park improvements
Community Meetings Regarding Park [mpro�ements
• solicitation of input on park maintenance issues
• solicit input on recreation programming, Community Center operations and
Centerbrook golf course.
Three community meetings were held September 16, October 20 and November 17 at
Palmer Lake, Garden City and Northport Elementary Schools respectively.
To publicize these meetings, notices were sent to all residents within two blocks of each
of the affected parks, notices were posted at the parks themselves, flyers were also sent
home with all elementary students and meeting notices included in the local newspaper
and cable television.
Citizen attendance at the meetings was varied. Thirty -seven residents attended the first
meeting, seven the second meeting and only five the last meeting.
2 Community Meetings Regarding Park Improvements
September 19, 1998 Meeting
INTRODUCTION
Parks and Recreation Commission Chair Bud Sorenson introduced himself and identified
the purpose of the meeting. He indicated that in lieu of their regular September, October
and November meetings, the Parks and Recreation Commission was hosting a series of
community meetings regarding park improvements. He continued that tonight's meeting
was the first of these meetings and that he encouraged those present to comment on the
long range park improvement plan and ask questions.
PARKS IMPROVEMENT PLAN
He then introduced Public Works Director Diane Spector who provided background
information rel;ardin- the Capital Improvement Plan and discussed the improvements
anticipated in the next few years. After completing her comments, Ms. Spector asked for
comments on the plan and /or questions from the audience.
A number of attendees had comments and /or questions regarding East Palmer Park. One
resident commented on the condition of the park and the actions of some of the youth
using the park, primarily the basketball courts. He added that cars often exited the park at
high rates of speed.
Ms. Spector responded that the City was aware of a number of the issues and was taking
steps to address them. She indicated that new playground equipment was going to be
installed in the park yet this fall and plans called for the shelter building to be replaced by
a picnic pavilion in the year 2000.
In addition, she added that crews from Hennepin County's Sentence to Serve were
scheduled to come out to the park in the next two weeks to trim trees, remove brush and
improve sight lines to the basketball courts. She further indicated that some of the items
such as speeding and inappropriate behavior were referred to the Police Department and
they were intending to increase patrols in the area.
Another resident asked about the Palmer Lake trail and indicated some segments are often
under water. A Group of residents asked about the high water level in the Palmer Lake
3 Community h1eetings Regarding Park Improvements
basin. They indicated the water level appears to be higher than it was prior to the
reconstruction of the 69th Avenue bridge. They also felt that beaver dams in Palmcr Lake
were adding to the problem as water was being retained in the Palmer Lake basin.
Ms. Spector responded that the engineering firm in charge of the bridge replacement
project had taken creek bed elevations before and after the project, and they had remained
at the same level. She indicated an independent engineering study had determined that
the high water level in the area was the result of sedimentation of the entire Palmer Lake
basin. She continued that the City does have plans to address the problem, but indicated
the improvement would need to be completed in phases as the cost of the improvements
would likely exceed $1,000,000.
One resident discussed the actions of the basketball players at Firehouse Park. She
indicated that some of the players were using her yard as a bathroom instead of walking
to the portable restroom located by the shelter building. She commented that she would
like to see the basketball court moved to a different location.
Many additional comments were offered regarding the above noted issues regarding East
Palmer Park, the water level of Palmer Lake lighting and sight lines in the park .
Public Works Director Spector responded to each of the questions and referred others to
the appropriate departments.
INPUT REGARDING RECREATION, THE COMMUNITY CENTER AND
CENTERBROOK
Community Activities, Recreation and Services Director Jim Glasoe introduced himself
and indicated that in addition to input related to the park improvements plan, the
Commission was also interested in any input related to recreation programming, the
Brooklyn Center Community Center and Centerbrook Golf Course.
One resident responded that she had been unhappy with the swim lesson program they
had enrolled their grandchildren in during 1996. Mr. Glasoe responded that a new
aquatics supervisor was hired in April of 1998 and that improvements had been initiated
and would continue. Another resident added that they had their children enrolled in the
swim lesson program over the last few months and that they had been very satisfied. No
additional comments and questions were received regarding recreation, the Community
Center or Cente
rbrook.
COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT
City Council Liaison Kathleen Carmody addressed the audience and asked if they had any
questions or comments regarding developments or issues in the city. Councilmember
Carmody then answered questions about the theater complex proposed for Interstate 694
and Highway 252, the proposed development at 69th Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard
and issues related to Brookdale.
4 Community Meetings Regarding Park impnnements
CLOSING
Chair Sorenson again addressed the audience, thanking them for their participation and
reminded them that the Commission would be holding similar meetings in October and
November and that they were welcome to attend.
Community Meetings Regarding Park Improvements
3
October 20, 1998 Meeting
INTRODUCTION
Parks and Recreation Chair Bud Sorenson introduced himself and identified the purpose
of the meeting. He indicated that the Parks and Recreation Commission was hosting a
series of community meetings regarding park improvements. He encouraged those
present to comment on the long range park improvement plan and ask questions. He then
introduced Councilmember Kathleen Carmody, Director of Public Works Diane Spector
and Director of Community Activities, Recreation and Services Jim Glasoe.
PARKS IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Public Works Director Diane Spector provided background information regarding the
parks Capital Improvement Plan and discussed the improvements anticipated in the next
few years. After completing her remarks, Ms. Spector asked for comments on the plan
and /or questions from the audience.
A number of meeting attendees had comments and /or questions regarding maintenance
issues in the parks. One resident commented on the condition of Marlin Park, primarily
the location of one of the newly installed trees and an area where the grass has not
reestablished itself.
Ms. Spector responded that the City was aware of these issues and that she understood the
tree had been moved. She indicated maintenance staff would take a look at the area in
question and address the tree issue.
Another resident asked about the "dry pond" at Orchard Lane Park. She reported that the
pond has had standing water in it all Summer. Ms. Spector responded that some
additional work had been completed on the pond over the summer and that it should work
more effectively. However, she cautioned that the pond was designed to hold storm water
from a large area and as a result may never be completely dry.
Some additional comments were offered regarding trail signage, areas for cross country
skiing, lighting at Freeway Park, dog feces on trails and drainage issues at Marlin Park.
6 Community Meetings Regarding Park Improvements
Public Works Director Spector responded to each of the questions and added that all of
the issues discussed would be investi-ated and /or referred to the appropriate department.
INPUT REGARDING RECREATION, THE COMMUNITY CENTER AND
CENTERBROOK
Community Activities, Recreation and Services Director Jim Glasoe introduced himself
and indicated that in addition to input related to the park improvements plan, the
Commission was also interested in any feedback they might have related to current
recreation programming, the Brooklyn Center Community Center and Centerbrook Golf
Course.
One resident remarked that she would like to see a Jacuzzi tub at the Communitv Center.
Mr. Glasoe responded that the City is currently in the initial stages of putting together a
plan to provide for needed ADA and health /safety improvements at City Hall and the
Community Center. He indicated that he would document her request so that it might be
considered during the planning process.
One resident asked about the possibility of additional teen programs. Mr. Glasoe
responded that the Community Activities, Recreation and Services Department had
identified the need for additional teen programming and had made it one of their
departmental priorities. He added that the city was currently working with Brooklyn
Peacemaker Center on their Community of Promise youth initiatives program. No
additional comments and questions were received regarding recreation, the Community
Center or Centerbrook.
COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT
City Cotulcil Liaison Kathleen Carmody addressed the audience and asked if they had any
questions or comments regarding developments or issues in the City. Councilmember
Carmody discussed the theater complex proposed for Interstate 694 and Highway 252, the
proposed development at 69th Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard, future Brooklyn
Boulevard street improvements and issues related to Brookdale.
CLOSING
Chair Sorenson again addressed the audience, thanking them for their participation and
reminding them that the Commission would be holding a similar meeting in November.
7 Community Meetings Regarding Park Improvements
4
November 17, 1998 Meeting
INTRODUCTION
Chair Sorenson introduced himself and identified the purpose of the meeting. He
indicated the Parks and Recreation Commission was hosting a series of community
meetings regarding park improvements. He encouraged those present to comment on the
long range park improvement plan and ask questions. He then introduced Mayor Myrna
Kragness, Director of Public Works Diane Spector and Director of Community Activities,
Recreation and Services Jim Glasoe.
PARKS IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Public Works Director Diane Spector provided background information regarding the
parks Capital Improvement Plan and discussed the improvements anticipated in the next
few years. After completing her remarks, Ms. Spector asked for comments on the plan
and /or questions from the audience.
One of the meeting attendees indicated that she was affiliated with Northport Elementary
School PTO and asked about the possibility of the City assisting in the renovation of
basketball courts at the school. Public Works Director Spector responded that the City
has cooperated with schools on a number of similar joint projects where the City owned
park land that was directly adjacent to a school. She asked that the representative contact
her to further discuss the possibility.
Another meeting attendee commented on the condition of Wangsted Park, primarily the
maintenance of the park. She shared pictures of the park showing tall grass in the
playground area and rust on the equipment.
Ms. Spector responded that the City was aware of these issues and that improvements
were planned for 1999, including replacement of the playground equipment. Ms. Spector
also commented that the maintenance efforts at the parks were limited this year as the
City was not able to hire their normal number of parks maintenance staff due to the
employment economy.
Another resident asked about the softball fields at East Palmer Lake Park. Ms. Spector
responded that the north field had recently been raised and would be renovated (seeded,
new backstop and fencing) in 1999.
8 Community Nleetin_s Regarding Park Improvements
One resident spoke regarding the possibility of adding a disc golf course on city property.
He indicated that he lived in the city and owned a business which promotes and distributes
golf discs, golf apparel and marketing support for disc golf courses. Director of
Community Activities, Recreation and Services Jim Glasoe asked that the gentleman stay
after the meeting so that they could discuss the issue further.
Some additional discussion was held regarding Twin Lake Park and the Joslyn property.
Public Works Director Spector responded to each of the questions and added that all of
the issues discussed would be investigated and /or referred to the appropriate department.
INPUT REGARDING RECREATION, THE COMMUNITY CENTER AND
CENTERBROOK
Community Activities, Recreation and Services Director Jim Glasoe introduced himself
and indicated that in addition to input related to the park improvements plan, the
Commission was also interested in any feedback they might have related to current
recreation programming, the Brooklyn Center Community Center and Centerbrook Golf
Course.
A couple of the residents remarked that they had been involved in the city's recreation
programs and had been satisfied with the activities.
Mayor Kragness asked for specific input on the Community Center. She indicated that the
City was in the initial stages of putting together a plan to provide for needed ADA and
health/safety improvements at City Hall and the Community Center.
One resident commented that the pool and water slide were great but the exercise area
was small and had only minimal equipment. Community Activities, Recreation and
Services Director Jim Glasoe responded that the city had also identified the exercise area
as an issue and were beginning to review alternate locations. He indicated that the police
would be vacating the lower level of City Hall once their new police station was
completed in 1999. He added that the vacated space or other locations in the Community
Center were being investigated for an updated exercise area. He noted that by moving the
exercise area, the current space could be used for family or personal locker room space.
Another resident commented on the poor accessability of the Community Center. She
indicated that it was very inconvenient to park in the lower level and have to climb the
stairs to get a swim band, only to go back down the stairs to the locker rooms and the
pool. She added that making the trip with children only made the process more difficult.
Mr. Glasoe responded that the accessability issues had also been identified and will be
considered as part of any building revisions.
•
9 community Meetings Regarding Park Improvements
COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT
Mayor Kragness addressed the audience and asked if they had any questions or comments
regarding the City. Mayor Kragness discussed Brooklyn Boulevard, the theater complex
proposed for Interstate 694 and Highway 252, the proposed development at 69th Avenue
and Brooklyn Boulevard and issues related to Brookdale.
CLOSING
Chair Sorenson again addressed the audience, thanking them for their participation.
10 Community Meetings Regarding Park Improvements
5
Recommendations
The Brooklyn Center park system is in the process of being systematically renovated and
updated. A thorough review of park facilities has been completed and a plan for
improvements has been developed. This plan anticipates the continued use of General
Fund operating capital to make improvements such as minor equipment replacement, trail
repair, minor shelter building repair and minor repair of other park improvements. Major
improvements such as playground replacement, shelter building replacement, parking lot
improvements, etc. would be financed through the Capital Improvements Fund.
So as to promote public understanding of this revised classification system and to solicit
input regarding long -term improvements, the Parks and Recreation Commission hosted a
series of three community meetings on park improvements.
Resident comments at the meetings were largely related to maintenance issues in the
parks. The large turn out at the first meeting was primarily the result of issues related to
maintenance and patron conduct at East Palmer Lake Park.
At each of the meetings, residents were asked to react to the revision of the park
classification system and to the specific improvements detailed in the plan. Although
residents seemed to understand and react favorably to the changes in classification system,
resident responses were generally limited to the specifics and /or timing of individual
improvements.
Based upon citizen response gathered at the above noted meetings, the Parks and
Recreation Commission makes the following recommendations to the City Council related
to capital improvements in the parks.
► The revised parks classification system is consistent with the current recreational needs
of the community.
► The current five year plan for park improvements recognizes the need to provide well
maintained facilities and is consistent with the identified needs related to park
amenities.
► The capital improvements plan should be re- evaluated on a regular basis to assure it
continues to reflect the current needs.
11 Community Meetings Regarding Park Improvements
► It is recommended that the current level of park maintenance be continued as a
minimum. In addition, the Commission recommends the City Council consider options
to increase the level of maintenance.
► The development of Park Watch groups or similar opportunities for citizen
involvement in the parks should continue to be a priority.
► The Council should direct staff to continue to explore opportunities for joint ventures,
collaborative programming and sharing of resources, especially in the area of teen
programming.
Recommendations for Specific Improvements
0. Improve bicycle /pedestrian trail signage with mile markers and informational signs.
► Direct staff to complete an application to the DNR for a fishing pier to be placed at
Twin Lake Park. Eliminate the swimming beach at the park, remove the
shelterbuilding, eliminate the ballfield and relocate the playground equipment.
► Approve the Brooklyn Center School District's request to make improvements, at
their expense, to Firehouse Park to provide more opportunities for girl's softball.
► At East Palmer Park, increase maintenance, improve lighting, and evaluate options for
relieving trail flooding.
12 Community Meetings Regarding Park Improvements
City Council Agenda Item No. 9e
• MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 9, 1998
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Diane Spector, Director of Public Works
Jim Glasoe, Director of Community Activities, Recreation and Services
SUBJECT: Proposal From Brooklyn Center High School Re: Firehouse Park
A few months ago we were approached by representatives of the Brooklyn Center School
District regarding a proposal to add softball facilities at Firehouse Park. The district desires to
have an additional softball field at the park to provide additional opportunities for girls' softball.
Adding a field is possible, but would require relocating a trail and possibly the basketball court.
(See attached diagram).
In subsequent discussions, the district has suggested that they would be willing to pay the capital
costs of installing the new field and relocating the trail. However, it is questionable whether the
basketball court would be required to be relocated. Coincidentally, at a recent Park and
• Recreation Commission neighborhood meeting, residents adjacent to Firehouse Park have
requested that the basketball court be relocated because of noise and other problems arising from
its current location. Based on these resident requests, staff recommends that the court be moved
and that the City and school district share in the cost of its relocation.
Staff believes that it is in the best interest of the City to work cooperatively with the school
district to accomplish these improvements to Firehouse Park. Aside from park maintenance
labor and equipment use to prepare the field, the only cost to the City would be an estimated
$4,000 for half the cost of relocating the basketball court. This information was received too late
to be included in the CIP and the Capital Improvements Fund budget. Therefore, we recommend
the Council by motion authorize the expenditure of an additional $4,000 for park improvements
from the Capital Improvements Fund in 1999 for the City's share of costs.
If the Council approves this school district request, then staff will work with the school district to
prepare an agreement regarding the improvements, cost sharing, and maintenance
responsibilities.
•
3
P
� x
5
, a
i
x
s-a
Y
E
r ,
9
d ,
r�.
s .
3
IMR
C
stir+ a,
ow !„
T.
ro
4 ,
Y
} � 3
T
xZ- e
I' �E
2 6 r'✓r'
� �
izv
it
e Im
cn
E
r
x
ri
F
m
r
YY
City Council Agenda Item No. 9f
a
•
O �pOKLYN CE11
BROOKLYN CENTER
POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk
FROM: Joel Downer, Chief of Police
DATE: December 8, 1998
SUBJECT: Application for Exempt Permit
(Bingo)
Evergreen Park Elementary PTO
. On December 8, 1998, the Brooklyn Center Police Department received an Application for
Exempt Permit from Evergreen Park Elementary PTO. This application is for an event to be held
at the Evergreen Park Elementary School, 7200 Dupont Avenue North, on Friday, January 22,
1999. This application has been approved and will be returned to the Evergreen Park Elementary
representative after City Council review. The representative will forward it to the State
Gambling Control Board.
If you or any member of the City Council objects to issuing this license, you must notify me
within 30 days according to Minnesota State Statute.
JD:kh
For Board Use Only I
Minnesota Lawful Gambling Fee Paid i
Application for Exempt Permit - LG220 Check No.
Initials
Organization Information Received _/ /Lj
Organization name ( Previous lawful gambling exemption number
lg ,f { e e rg �Ci �' I� F 1 c v" . P,-50, b :' l ,
Street City State /Zip Code County HelAnep'4
00 �c�0�s --, `�- O AJ 13i' ooktYuA +er, (AAU 55t13c
Name of chief execiutive officer (CEO) of organization Daytime phone number of
First name / Last name
7 , `v t, -,e / CEO: ( (a f Z
Name of teasurer of organization V
Da time hone number of
First name Last name
U Y P
treasurer: ((� � z ) 5p - Z5 e) -o
Type of Nonprofit Organization
Check the box that best describes your organization:
❑ Fraternal ❑ Religious
❑ Veteran Other nonprofit organization
h ox that ' d o his Check the b t t indicates the a of roof our organization attache t t
• type P Y 9 application:
❑ IRS letter indicating income tax exempt status
Certificate of Good Standing from the Minnesota Secretary of State's Office
❑ A charter showing you are an affiliate of a parent nonprofit organization
❑ Proof previously submitted and on file with the Gambling Control Board
Gambling Premises Information
Name of premises where ga�mbling e_ , activit y will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place)
(
Address (clAot use PO box) City State/Zip Code County) l ' eft jj ep r
7 Z_0 o cm c1` . /� , G' 1 O )C n Q V - -evr
Date(s) of activity (for ra es, indicate the date of the drawing)
Z Q. K\ L) CL 2 - Z ) 19 c 7
Check the box or boxes that indicate the type of gambling activity your organization will be conducting:
*Bingo ❑ Raffles ❑ *Paddlewheels ❑ *Pull -Tabs ❑ *Tipboards
*Equipment for these activities must be obtained from a licensed distributor.
This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request.
• The information requested on this form will become public information when received by the Board, and will be used to determine
your compliance with Minnesota statutes and rules governing lawful gambling activities.
Page 1 of 2
3/98
c
Page 2 of 2
Application for Exempt Permit - LG220 [� �^ 3198
Organization Name V c� 5 re-C- tt le M.
Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment (Required by Statute)
• SlfegamblIng�pcemesisvrnthn cty�limits, the If tfie gambling premises:is located in a:#ownship, both
c m ustsi g n a ppiicabolr., � the county and township mu - st sign this applic on . 1 11
On behalf of the city, I acknowledge this application On behalf of the county, I acknowledge this application
and three options for the city: and three options for the county:
1. Approve the application: By taking no action, 1. Approve the application: By taking no action, the
the city allows the Board to issue a permit after county allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days.
30 days (60 days for a first class city). 2. Waive the above -noted waiting period: The county
allows the Board to issue a permit before 30 days.
2. Waive the above -noted waiting period: The Documentation attached.
city allows the Board to issue a permit before 3. Deny the application by passing a resolution within
30 days (60 days for a first class city). Docu- 30 days.
mentation attached. Print name of county:
3. Deny the application by passing a resolution
within 30 days (60 days for a first.class city). (Signature of county personnel receiving application)
Print me of e Crt -k r• Title
N t Date
(Signature of city personnel receiving application) On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the
Title C t �i `� C ler1— organization is applying for exempted gambling activity
Date la / q $ within the township limits.
A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny
an application (Minn. Stat. sec. 349.213, subd. 2).
® Print name of township:
(Signature of township official acknowledging application)
Title
Date
Chief Executive Officer's Signature
The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Chief Executive Officer's signature
'� // n ,
Name (please print) I�Or� l e - , - V1 ( � (' rvtc9cE�l D ate
Mail Application and Attachment(s)
At least 45 days prior to your scheduled activity date send:
• the completed application;
• a copy of your proof of nonprofit status, and
• a $25 application fee (make check payable to "State of Minnesota "). Application fees are not prorated,
refundable, or transferable.
Send to: Gambling Control Board
1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South
Roseville, MN 55113
• If your application has not been acknowledged by the local unit of government, do not send the application to the
Gambling Control Board.
W� .�s,t•.,+ � .n �3' t�,,.ti =. � y ..-.. v '�':'`
i y,�� q +� IISN nN + Hfi t, , y r 7 ,' Y..i 1 . , Y.t A t, f ` t 1 � `Y`^~ G j'�'� ,`�, '' 'O•' `L �, y;;,�'J: %'t 1.('� ..+
r �ylw'
r� Y +u�i(illtiLL. � Itu�Nnetu&!�i Vjy�,,' 1�r d yel Y;�lj �,,�1M ,.a<,. Tr• .I �liSr&`� n�..h�.a''P,Ae . x� , i. � f 'p' �T"'Y.3�., �J,�
> WI��R?lii➢h1F =ti1�LLL�- .. � ���r1. � 3 , {�, (1 W N
of Minn
SECRETARY OF STAT
z� Certificate of Good standing
I Joan Anderson Growe, Secretary of State of Minnesota do
certify that: The corporation listed below is a corporations
formed under the laws of Minnesota; that the corporation was
formed by the filing of Articles of Incorporation with the
Office of
.� the Secretary of State on the date listed below; that
the corporation is governed by the chapter of Minnesota Statutes �W
listed below; and that this corporation is authorized
to
business as a corporation at the time this certificate is do
issued.
Name: Evergreen Park Elementary PTO
>�? Date Formed: 12/04/1998 t
Chapter Governed By: 317A ,
This certificate has been issued on 12/09
(fly,4 Olt - � N
r tT'
,
L a
Q k
Secr etary >
C
ter of . - -�1
..� •_ ato.
���,r+ � ° ��R� ^��\�'o'�wL�'�ti�.1,�`$!t�'.:. �i'ti ;+t' =t1 I�. .. R,��4��,�.•. +r�,�.�tis p �� -
.,. ,:� •t , 4,;.. ,'a ���5,�{!i +�' �:5�,�� '�t e , ,� � }• ` �� Fy, ,N', f.�, �' h , �y� ", .�� Q�`- l 'R ., .i � "� � ,�� 1 � �'
sa1.:s::�„— _vr,'•,.:..�,.� �'/ � ,�, .�Ji.'a..��i..: � 1�JA-�, o ? ; � � , �{�n.X�7> \� ���� t ' ' i+� .a.
ZO d Ztr:9t 86, 6 �aQ tr890- STZ- Zt9:xp� 99f1 SOS
City Council Agenda Item No. 9g
MEMORANDUM
•
DATE: December 7, 1998
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager t.
FROM: ichael Krech Public s S W
M Work Specialist
P
SUBJECT: An Ordinance Amending Sections 25 -501, 25 -1003, 25 -1006, 25 -1010 and 25 -1015 of
The Brooklyn Center Code of Ordinances and a Resolution Adopting Right -of -Way
Permit Fee and Restoration Bond Rate Schedule
Ordinance 97 -17 was adopted on December 15, 1997. This ordinance added Right -of -Way Management
Sections 25 -1000 through 25 -1032 to the Brooklyn Center Code of Ordinances. I have reviewed the
sections and compared them with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission's latest set of rules and
recently approved right -of -way ordinances of other cities. Further review with public works and
engineering staff outlined some changes that should be made to the chapter. The changes include:
• amending Chapter 25 -501 to require a permit for private driveway or sidewalk construction which
impacts the right -of -way
• amending Chapter 25 -1003 to include additional exceptions
• amending Chapter 25 -1006 to include additional exceptions
• amending Chapter 25 -1010 to eliminate the permittee's option to pay the City to do the restoration
® work
amending Section 25 -1015 to require conformance with the Brooklyn Center Standard Design
Plates
A rate schedule was developed for permit fees and restoration bonds. The permit fees are authorized in
Section 25 -1009 and the restoration bonds are authorized in Section 25 -1010. The rates have been
established by evaluating City time required to administer the permits, rate schedules from other cities,
discussions with private utility companies and equitable allocation of cost to all right -of -way users. The
purpose of these fees is to cover the cost of the City's time administering the right -of -way ordinance.
Application forms are attached for your information.
lmoact on Residential Property Owners
A permit would now be required for driveway or sidewalk construction within the right -of -way. There is
no charge in the proposed rate schedule for the permit, but depending on the type of work being
undertaken, a restoration bond may be required. This permit would alert us of a driveway improvement so
City inspectors can be on site as the work occurs. This would eliminate past problems of poor quality work
resulting in snow plow damage or street repair.
The restoration bond amounts have been increased to reflect the actual cost of restoration. For example,
the current restoration bond required for a residential utility cut is $500. This is insufficient to cover the
City's cost if the restoration is done poorly and the contractor walks away, leaving the City to restore the
street cut.
. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 11th day of January, 1999, at
7 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek
Parkway, to consider an amendment to Chapter 25 regarding the regulation of the use of public
right of way.
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in
advance. Please contact the City Clerk at 569 -3300 to make arrangements.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 25 -501. 25 -1003.
25 -1006. 25 -1010 AND 2.5- 10.15 OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER
CODE OF ORDINANCES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 25 -501 is amended as follows:
Section 25 -501. WHEN AUTHORIZED. Property owners are hereby authorized to
construct driveways and sidewalks traversing the boulevard connecting onto the streets owned
by the City of Brooklyn Center subject to the following conditions:
a. Such construction work must be done at the expense of the property owner (and no such
construction work shall impair or damage the street). No such construction shall be allowed
without having an annroved hermit from the Director of Public Works.
Section 2. Section 25 -1003 Subd. 3 is amended as follows:
Subdivision 3. Exceptions. Nothing herein shall be construed to repeal or amend the
provisions of a city ordinance permitting persons to plant or maintain boulevard plantings or
gardens in the area of the right -of -way between their property and the street curb provided and
such use is subject to the use of the right -of -way by the City or other Persons for installation and
maintenance of facilities. Persons planting or maintaining boulevard plantings or gardens or
installing or operating irrigation systems shall not be deemed to use or occupy the right -of -way,
and shall not be required to obtain any permits or satisfy any other requirements for planting or
maintaining such boulevard plantings or gardens under this Right -of -Way Management
Ordinance. However, excavations deeper than 12 inches are subject to the permit requirements
of section 25 -1006. Registration shall not be required for
a. Private driveways or walkways(,)
. b. Sewer and water connections serving individual properties (or)
. ORDINANCE NO.
! q. Equipment of a private landowner which is within the right -of -way and between
that owner's property and the street curb
d. Signs
e. Mailboxes
f. Street furnishings
g. Bus stop benches
h. Bus stop shelter.
(; however such activities are not exempt from permitting requirements of section 25- 1006.)
Any Service or Utility Service provided by a person under a franchise with the City shall register
pursuant to this section, but need not provide the registration information required by Section
25 -1004 if such information has been received by the City in the administration of the franchise
agreement. In addition, persons acting as agents, contractors or subcontractors for a registrant
which has properly registered or who is exempt from registration shall be exempt from
registering under Section 25 -1004.
Section 3. Section 25 -1006 Subd. 1 is amended as follows:
c. Exceptions. A hermit shall not be required for:
a. Signs
• b. Mailboxes
c. Street furnishings
d. Bus stop benches
e. Bus stop shelter.
Section 4. Section 25 -1010 Subd. 2 is amended as follows:
Subdivision 2. Repair and Restoration. Permittee shall repair and restore its own work. The
permittee (In addition, in its application for an excavation permit, the permittee may choose
either to have the City restore the right -of -way or to restore the right -of -way itself.)
( a. City Restoration. If the permittee chooses to have the City restore the right -of -way, it
shall pay the costs thereof within thirty (30) days of billing. If, during the twelve (12)
months following such restoration, the pavement settles due to permittee's improper
backfilling, the permittee shall pay to the City, within thirty (30) days of billing, the
cost of repairing said pavement. The Manager may require the permittee to provide a
payment bond or prepay the estimated costs of such r estoration the unused p ortion of
which shall be returned to the permittee.
b. Permittee Restoration. If the permittee chooses to restore the right -of -way itself, it)
shall at the time of application for an excavation permit post a restoration bond in an
• amount determined by the Director to be sufficient to cover the cost of restoring the
right -of -way to its pre- excavation condition. If, twelve (12) months after completion
• ORDINANCE NO.
of the restoration of the right -of -way, the Director determines that the right -of -way has
been properly restored, the surety on the restoration bond shall be released. Permittees
with whom the City has a current franchise agreement, or authorized agents,
contractors, or subcontractors of that franchise shall not be required to post a
restoration bond.
Section 5. Section 25 -1015 is amended as follows:
Section 25- 1015. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. The excavation, backfilling, repair
and restoration, and all other work performed in the right -of -way shall be done in conformance
with ( "The Standard Specifications for Street Openings ") the Brooklyn Center Standard Design
Plates as promulgated by the Director and at a location as required by Section 25 -1021.
Section 6. This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and thirty days
following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of , 1999.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
(Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.)
•
. its adoption: Member introduced the following resolution and moved
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING RIGHT -OF -WAY PERMIT FEE AND RESTORATION
BOND RATE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization set forth in the Brooklyn Center Code of
Ordinances Section 25 -1009 and 25 -1010, a Right of Way Permit Fee and Restoration Bond Rate
Schedule has been prepared.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that the permit fees and restoration bond amounts for work done within
the right of way are set as follows:
Collectors and Arterial Streets Other Streets
FEES Schedule A Schedule B
Administration (per permit) $75 $50
Hole (per hole) $100 $50
Trench in street (per 100 LF) $50 $30
Trench in boulevard (per 100 LF) $20 $20
Obstruction / Aerial (per 100 LF) $0.10 $0.05
Extension (per permit) $75 $50
Delay Penalty (per day) $50 $20
RESTORATION BONDS
Driveway cut (per driveway) $2500 $1000
Residential sewer and water utility cut (per service) $4000 $2500
Hole (per hole) $7500 $5000
Trench in street (per 100 LF) $5000 $2500
Trench in boulevard (per 100 LF) $500 $250
Obstruction / Aerial (per 100 LF) $250 $100
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
REGISTRATION APPLICATION
;;I City of FOR UTILITIES WITHIN CITY RIGHT OF WAY
• BROOKLYN Brooklyn Center Public Works Department
C�1Y 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 -2199
569 -3340
569 -3494 fax
Registrant nformatcon (Company Information}
......u.
,e ., mc.... ..... FG.t.. ___ ....Ea.E..aa.x . � .naw^ . ...... ..n , e. ...= .. ........:.. .....� - M.v, `.�.
Name:
Address:
City: State: Zip Code:
Phone Number: Fax Number:
E -Mail Address:
One -Cal! Information (If applicable}
Operator Registration Number: ID Number (If Contractor):
Local Reprasentahve (Reason that can speak locally for the company)
Name:
Address:
City: State: Zip Code:
Phone Number: Fax Number:
E -Mail Address:
24 Hoerr Emergency Contact Informatron (Not�iy the city imrned�ateiy if t�s information changes}���"
__...
.,.. , .m.,_ �u
Name: Phone Number: Pager: Fax Number:
Cert�ficateS and Lacenses_ _ E }
x
Please attach copies of certificates and licenses as required for registration
1. Certificate of Insurance
2. Certificate of Incorporation (If Incorporated)
3. Certificate of Authority from Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC)
4. Removal Bond (Equipment Owner Only)
5. Minnesota Contractors License
_ E i r r
For pfFce Ilse Only
..... � . _ _.... .. K_ '.
1
Date Received: Date Approved:
Registration Number Assigned: Registered by Whom:
Company Name: Date: page 1
REGISTRATION APPLICATION
City of FOR UTILITIES WITHIN CITY RIGHT OF WAY
• WROOKLYN Brooklyn Center Public Works Department
CA NTER 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 -2199
569 -3340
569 -3494 fax
GQnstrur ion and Mayo�tnt nance Plan
__. r M . ..
.. v. �. _ �: " _
Next Year Proiects
Write a brief project description with estimated beginning and ending dates for projects that will commence during the next calendar year.
Highlight each project area on the attached map. Number the highlighted areas to match the appropriate description. ie. 1,2,3,...
Five Year Proiects
Write a brief project description with estimated beginning and ending dates for tentative projects that will commence during
the five years following the next calendar year. Highlight each project area on the attached map.
Number the highlighted areas to match the appropriate description and year planned for construction. ie. 1999 - 1,1999- 2,2000 -1,...
Company Name: Date: page 2
APPLICATION FOR RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT
City of Brooklyn Center Public Works Department
BROOKLYN 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
i CENTER Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 -2199
569 -3340 569 -3494 fax
Excavation Permit J Obstruction Permit Joint Application
UTILITY OWNER:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . ......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(List all participants
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For a Joint Application)
Gopher One Call Reg. No. Plan No. Project No.
LOCATION:
..... ...................................................................................................................................................................................... ...............................
From and To:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
APPLICANT:
........... ...............................
.............................................................................................. ............................... P ............ : .......... ....................
Address: Tele hone•
...........
Add
. ................................................................................. ............................... ... ............................... ......... ...............................
City: State: Zip:
................................................................................. ............................... ........................
Contact Person: Telephone:
................... ............................... ........ ............................... ...... ............................... ......... ...............................
24 Hour Contact: Telephone: Pager: Cell Phone:
CONTRACTOR: Gopher One Call Reg. No.
....... .................................................................... ............................... ......... ...............................
Address: Telephone:
......... ...............................
City: State: Zip:
Contact Person: Telephone:
......... ...............................
24 Hour Contact: Telephone: Pager: Cell Phone:
FACILITIES INFORMATION
� A [j Gas ❑ Electrical ❑ Telecom ❑ Cable ❑ Storm Sewer Traffic ❑ Water
Sewer [J Other:
PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION
New J Replacement Repair Other:
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
J Trench ❑ Hole ❑ Chamber ❑ Bore (specify)
......................................................................................... ...............................
Aerial ❑ Plow J Other:
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
Length: Width: Depth: Total Linear Feet of Installation:
ROW USED
�[ Road (Sch. A) J Road (Sch. B) J Boulevard Sidewalk Other:
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
Start Date: Weekend Dates:
End Date: After Hours Dates:
'City Comments:
_ Complete Right of Way Registration on file with the City.
_ Attach proposed plans that meet the requirements of
of this permit application as specified in the general
conditions.
_ Include the permit fee calculated from the Permit Rate /
Sheet. DATE RECEIVED:
_ Include a restoration bond for the amount calculated APPROVED BY:
from the Permit Rate Sheet.
DATE APPROVED:
PERMIT RATE SHEET
City of Brooklyn Center Public Works Department
BROOKLYN 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
CENTER Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 -2199
569 -3340 569 -3494 fax
FEES Schedule A Schedule B
Administration (per permit) $ 75.00 $ 50.00
Hole (per hole) $ 100.00 $ 50.00
Trench in street (per 100 LF) $ 50.00 $ 30.00
Trench in boulevard (per 100 LF) $ 20.00 $ 20.00
Obstruction / Aerial (per 100 LF) $ 0.10 $ 0.05
Extension (per permit) $ 75.00 $ 50.00
Delay Penalty (per day) $ 50.00 $ 20.00
RESTORATION BONDS Schedule A Schedule B
Hole (per hole) $ 7,500.00 $ 5,000.00
Trench in street (per 100 LF) $ 5,000.00 $ 2,500.00
Trench in boulevard (per 100 LF) $ 500.00 $ 250.00
Obstruction / Aerial (per 100 LF) $ 250.00 $ 100.00
Work done in conjunction with a city project that is located within the limits of the project
and is completed during the construction period of the project shall be exempt from all
permit fees except the administration fee. If the work schedule is extended beyond the
completion of the construction period of the project all fees shall apply and are retroactive.
COLLECTOR STREET MAP
City Of Brooklyn Center Public Works Department
BROOKLYN 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
® CENTER Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 -2199
569 -3340 569 -3494 fax
s
zi t t
{{ V7 n -
3 ? ..3
i
a t
t t \
i
a
t
' Schedule A
' Schedule B
Work done in County or State right -of -way does not require a right -of -way
permit with Brooklyn Center. Make sure permits have been acquired from
all appropriate agencies before you start work. If you have questions
regarding which schedule your permit application falls under call
Michael Krech at 569 -3331.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
City of Brooklyn Center Public Works Department
BROOKLYN 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
CENTER Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 -2199
569 -3340 569 -3494 fax
The following general conditions apply to work done within the City's right -of -way:
1. The city must be notified prior to the commencement of work.
2. The applicant is responsible for providing and maintaining traffic control as
specified in the latest version of Appendix B of the Minnesota Manual of Uniform
Traffic Control Devices. If the applicant does not possess a copy of Appendix B,
one can be obtained from the Engineering Department.
3. The applicant is responsible for complying with all employee, trench and
roadway safety standards.
4. Provide scaled drawings showing the location of all facilities and improvements
proposed by the applicant. Drawings shall be submitted in English measurement
two (2) paper copies at 100 scale and one (1) copy in AutoCad format (Hennepin
County Coordinate system) with X,Y,Z dimensions to 1 foot accuracy. Electronic
drawings are only required for the installation of new or upgraded equipment.
5. The applicant shall notify the Engineering Department before starting work, upon
completion of work, and at any time when the construction is within ten (10) feet
of any City utility. The applicant shall make the work -site available for inspection
during and upon completion of work so that the City may inspect backfill and
compaction.
6. Contact Michael Krech at 569 -3331 or Dave Anderson at 569 -3323 to notify the
City of changes in work status or to arrange inspections.
DRIVEWAY AND UTILITY SERVICE PERMIT
City of Brooklyn Center Public Works Department
BROOKLYN 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
CENTER Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 -2199
AM:: 569 =3340 569 -3494 fax
❑ Driveway Permit
❑ Utility Permit
Location:
Applicant Name:
Address:
ip Code, Telephone No.:
MERM
Contractor:
Address:
City, State, Zip:
Phone Number, Gopher
State One Call Reg. No.:
r .
Restoration Bond or
Monetary Deposit:
Applicant Signature:
Date:
RESTORATION BOND AMOUNTS
City of Brooklyn Center Public Works Department
=1 BROOKLYN 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
CENTER Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 - 2199
569 -3340 569 -3494 fax
S f (1 'ffiE• � i � (t
i 9
i aL
: . f
i
F
"
I
I s
I
r � "
i
Schedule A
Schedule B
RESOTATION BONDS OR MONETARY DEPOSIT Schedule A Shedule B
Driveway cut (per driveway) $ 2,500.00 $ 1,000.00
•
Residential Sewer or Water Utility Cut (per service) $ 4,000.00 $ 2,500.00
GENERAL CONDITIONS
city of Brooklyn Center Public Works Department
BROOKLYN 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
CENTER Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 -2199
569 -3340 569 -3494 fax
The following general conditions apply to work done within the City's right -of -way:
1. The City must be notified prior to the commencement of work.
2. The applicant is responsible for providing and maintaining traffic control as
specified in the latest version of Appendix B of the Minnesota Manual of Uniform
Traffic Control Devices. If the applicant does not possess a copy of Appendix B,
one can be obtained from the Engineering Department.
3. The applicant is responsible for complying with all employee, trench and
roadway safety standards
4. Underground utility installations placed within roadway right -of -way must be inspected
by a member of the Public Utilities Department or Engineering Department
(585 -7100 or 569 -3340) prior to backfill of trench.
5. Underground utility installations placed within private property must be inspected by
a member of the Inspection Department (569 -3330) prior to backfill of the trench.
6. Backfill material must be inspected by a member of the Street Department or
Engineering Department (585 -7100 or 569- 3340). The inspector must be present
when the backfill begins.
7. Type quality and thickness of base and pavement structure placed within the
roadway patch area (includes drives and walks) shall be a minimum of 4" Class 5
Aggregate, 1 1/2" - 2331 Base and 1 1/2" - 2341 Wear as established by the
Engineering Department. The measurements shall match the existing conditions
unless they are less than these minimums in which case the minimum shall apply.
8. Pavement of a roadway patch must be done under the inspection of a member of
the Engineering Department.
9. Failure to comply with items 1 through 8 may result in reconstruction of all or part of
the project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; or assignment of the project
completion to a competent party with subsequent costs charged against the posted
monetary deposit or bond.
10. City shall Release balance of monetary deposit against which it has no claim upon
Date: Signature:
City Council Agenda Item No. 9h
•
City of Brooklyn Center
A great place to start. A great place to stay.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk �"
DATE: December 10, 1998
SUBJECT: Resolution Relating to Fees for Pawnbrokers and Secondhand Goods Dealers
Licenses and Investigations Thereof; Repealing Resolution No. 92 -15
At its October 13, 1998, meeting, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 98 -11, An Ordinance
Amending Chapter 23 of the Brooklyn Center Code of Ordinances, Relating to the Regulation of
Pawnbrokers and Secondhand Goods Dealers.
In 1992 the adopted annual fee for pawnbrokers and secondhand goods dealers was $1 2,000. With
the amendment to the City Ordinance regarding secondhand goods dealers, the Council requested
an amendment to the fee for secondhand goods dealers. The attached resolution amends Resolution
• No. 92 -15 and sets the fee for secondhand goods dealers to be $750 per year, plus $1.50 per
transaction.
Attachments
•
6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy; Brooklyn Center, 1IN 55430 -2199 • City Hall & TDD Number (612) 569 -3300
Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number (612) 569 -3400 • FAX (612) 569 -3494
An Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunities Employer
470 Pillsbury Center
200 South Sixth Street
CiGBP dVulu. �!��w6iu�V' %linneapolis NtN 55402
(612 337-9300 telephone
Dam (612) 337 -9310 tax
C H A R T E R E D e-mail: ams @kenncdv—
CHARLEs L. LEFEVERE
Attorney at Law
(612) 337 -9215
cleFevere@kennedy-graven.com
November 3, 1998
y_...
Lvio. J - v.. i >1: u:JVi1
City Clerk
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center MN 55430
RE: Pawn Shop License Fees
Dear Sharon:
Attached is a draft resolution which repeals Resolution No. 92 -15 relating to fees for pawn shop
dealers and secondhand goods dealers. This resolution can be used for the format for a
resolution amending the fees; however, as you can see, I have left the fee amounts blank. I have
asked Chief Downer to provide some input about the reasonable anticipated expenses of
administering these license programs so that fees can be established.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
Charles L. LeFevere
CLL:lh
Enclosure
cc: Chief Joel Downer (with enclosure)
� LL- 152741
BR-791-4
its adoption: Member introduced the following resolution and moved
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO FEES FOR PAWNBROKERS AND
SECONDHAND GOODS DEALERS LICENSES AND INVESTIGATIONS
THEREOF; REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 92 -15
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has adopted an ordinance regulating
pawnbrokers and secondhand goods dealers; and
WHEREAS, the ordinance states that licenses must be obtained to operate such
establishments; and
WHEREAS, the ordinance further states that applicants must be investigated by the
police department before such licenses can be issued; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 92 -15, the City Council established fees for licenses
and investigation of pawnbrokers and secondhand goods dealers licenses; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is reasonable and appropriate
that such resolution should be amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that Resolution No. 92 -15 is repealed and that the following fees are established:
Pawnbroker License $12,000 per year
Secondhand Goods Dealer License $750 per year, plus $1.50 per
transaction
Investigation Fee $1,500
An applicant for both a pawn shop license and a secondhand goods dealer license
at the same location is required to pay only one license fee of $12,000 per year and
only one investigation fee of $1,500
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
City Council Agenda Item No. 9i
City of Brooklyn Center
A great place to start. A great place to stay.
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 1998
SUBJECT: An Ordinance Amending Chapter 23 of the City Ordinances Relating to Payment by
Pawnbrokers and Secondhand Goods Dealers for Items Pledged and Location of
Pawnbrokers
Attached is correspondence received from City Attorney Charlie LeFevere regarding Sections 23-
627 and 23 -674 of the City Ordinances. Also attached is a memorandum from Planning and Zoning
Specialist Ron Warren, on behalf of the Planning Commission, regarding distance separations
between pawnbrokers and other uses.
An ordinance amendment has been drafted to incorporate both of these recommendations and is
included on the December 14, 1998, City Council agenda.
Attachments
6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 • City Hall & TDD Number (612) 569 -3300
Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number (612) 569 -3400 • FAX (612) 569 -3494
An Affirmatiue Action /Equal Opportunities Employer
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the I 1 th day of January, 1999, at 7
p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek
Parkway, to consider An Ordinance Amending Chapter 23 of the City Ordinances Relating to
Payment by Pawnbrokers and Secondhand Goods Dealers for Items Pledged and Location of
Pawnbrokers.
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in
advance. Please contact the City Clerk at 569 -3300 to make arrangements.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 23 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES
RELATING TO PAYMENT BY PAWNBROKERS AND SECONDHAND
GOODS DEALERS FOR ITEMS PLEDGED AND LOCATION OF
PAWNBROKERS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Brooklyn Center City Code Section 23 -627 is repealed as follows:
• Seetiart 2n' 627 i 3 �7u
€e�'-aii itca - i pledg or iccclvcdrat the liccnsc placc , t be made by eheek,
made ay-ablc to the ttante& e wll i ettt lly the i s eller .
Section 2. Brooklyn Center City Code Section 23 -674 is repealed as follows:
��Yiro1T ' 67 4. PAYMENTS B* nTG K. Y9Iacn a 3; e on d1. att goods d
makC3 P ,j a yfiicni in an amot3 - greater than one l for an 1tcal Crr itZin3
p ayme nt m s t L.... ...1
payable to the riame paycc, Nvl1o4s aetualIN "I_--i.--tided seller
Section 3. Brooklyn Center City Code Section 23 -606 is amended as follows:
Section 23 -606. SITE PLAN.
Subdivision 1. The application for pawnbroker license must be accompanied
Pp p P
by a site plan drawn to scale. The site plan must contain:
d. The location of any church, school, day -care center, hospital, on -sale liquor
establishment. halfwav house. theater., or residence within 300 feet of any portion of the premises
occupied by the applicant.
ORDINANCE NO.
Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and thirty days
following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of , 1999.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
(Strikeout indicates matter to be deleted underline indicates new matter.)
•
470 Pillsbury Center
200 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis MN 55402
_ (612) 337 -9300 telephone
(612) 337 -9310 fax
C H A R T E R E D e -mail attys @kennedy- graven.com
CHARLES L. LEFEVERE
Attorney at Law
(612) 337 -9215
November 20, 1998 cleFevere @kennedy - graven.com
Mr. Michael McCauley
City Manager
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creel' Px kv y
Brooklyn Center MN 55430
RE: Pawn Shop Ordinance
Dear Mike:
I received a call from Mr. Alan Cross of Cash and Pawn who informed me that City Code
Section 23 -627 which requires that the paNtin shop pay by check is an unnecessary burden
because the pawn shop simply issues the check and then immediately cashes it for the person
• pawning the goods. I confirmed this with the Detective Karns who said that, in his opinion, this
provision of the ordinance served no useful purpose.
Although I did not discuss it with Detective Karris, I assume that the same would be true of
Section 23 -674 which requires that payment for secondhand goods being purchased by a
secondhand goods dealer for more than $100 must also be paid by check.
I assume that the idea behind the ordinance was that a thief would be somewhat less likely to
fence stolen goods when receiving payment by check because it might be necessary to provide
identification twice to do so (once when pawning or selling goods and once when the check was
cashed,). However, this purpose is obviously not served if the party issuing the check
immediately cashes it.
Therefore, I have attached a proposed ordinance which could be used to repeal these two code
sections if you wish to do so. If there are other changes to the ordinance which are currently
being considered, you could also wait until later to make several changes at the same time. In
either case, the police department could be instructed not to enforce these requirements pending
review by the City Council.
V,ei:y truly yours,
Charles L. LeFevere
• CLLah
Enclosure
cc: Chief Joel Downer (w /encl)
Sharon Knutson (w /encl)
CLL- 153595
BR291 -4
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Ronald A. Warren, Planning and Zoning Speciali t
SUBJECT: Distance Separations Between Pawn Shops and Other Uses
DATE: October 13, 1998
Some time ago, the City Council requested the Planning Commission to review and make
recommendations as to the advisability of creating distance separations between pawn shops and
other uses.
Under the current proposed ordinance regulating pawnbrokers and secondhand goods dealers
there is a provision requiring a minimum 300 ft. separation between a school, daycare center or
church and a pawnbroker's operation.
The Planning Commission reviewed this matter at their September 24, 1998, study session and
their review of the matter can be found on pages 2 and 3 of their minutes from that meeting.
Generally, the Commission believed separation requirements from pawn shops were not zoning
related issued in that these uses exhibit the same zoning characteristics as other retail uses. The
Commission further believed, however, that the distance separations established in the licensing
regulations were appropriate and suggested that the City Council might wish to also consider
such separations for liquor establishments, half -way houses and theaters as part of the licensing
ordinance.
Mr. Warren reviewed and discussed with the Commissioners the recommended changes to:
Section 35 -314 - R5 Multiple Family Residence District adds a Special Uses subsection to allow
public and private elementary and secondary schools under certain conditions;
Section 35-320 - C1 Service /Office District. adds clarifying religious use language in subsection Le,
and adds paragraph 3.d. to allow educational uses excluding public and private elementary and
secondary schools; and
Section 35 -222 - C2 Commerce District, adds cross- reference language and adds language clarifying
educational uses. Mr. Warren noted a minor deletion to the added cross - reference proposed.
During discussion, inclusion of "K -12" to further clarify "educational" was recommended and agreed
upon. An added phrase, "but not limited to" was proposed and agreed upon to the "religious uses"
clarifying language. The Commissioners reiterated its view that it is improper to regulate
development of tax exempt operations through zoning. After considering the appropriateness of
mixing educational and religious uses in commercial /industrial areas, it was agreed that the building
permit process provides safeguards and standards for suitability of such combinations. Mindful of
avoiding impediments to expansion, the commissioners discussed options under which a church
(religious use) could add a school (educational use) to its operations.
ACTION TO REC _ADOP OF ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 35 OF THE
CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING CHURCH AN D EDUCATIONAL USES
There was a motion by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by Commissioner Erdmann, to recommend
to the Council that it adopt "An ordinance amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances regarding
church and educational uses" as amended by the Commissioners. (A copy of the ordinance agreed
upon by the Commissioners is made a part of these minutes by attachment.)
Voting in favor: Chair Willson, Commissioners Erdmann, Nelson, Rahn, and Reem.
The motion passed unanimously.
The Council will consider the recommendation at its Monday, September 28, 1998 meeting.
DISTANCE SEP ARATIONS BETWEEN PAWN SHO PS AND OTHER USES
Chair Willson introduced discussion item b: "distance separations between pawn shops and other
uses." and called on Mr. Warren for his comments.
Mr. Warren reviewed the status of the Council's current development of pawn shop /second hand
goods licensing regulations. The Commission is requested to consider whether such operations
should be separated by a certain distance from other uses based on zoning requirements.
During discussion, the Commissions concluded and agreed that distance separation in this instance
does not fall within zoning requirements, but rather is a licensing issue. It was noted that ordinances
are not designed to regulate "people" (i.e. customers) who may wish to use a facility and cautioned
• against the appearance of providing "exclusionary" operations.
9 -24 -98 2
The Commissioners declined to recommend anv zoning changes to accommodate distance separation
in this instance, supported the 300' distance separation of pawn shops from schools and day care
operations as a licensing requirement, and suggested the Council may also wish to consider such
separation from off -sale liquor establishments, half -way houses, and theaters.
There was a motion by Commissioner Reem, seconded by Commissioner Erdmann, to directed Mr.
Warren to convey the Commissions' conclusions regarding this matter to the City Council. The
motion passed unanimously.
FUTURE MEETING DATES
The next meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Thursday, October 15, 1998. Mr.
Warren briefly reviewed the agenda items for that meeting.
A joint meeting with the City Council is scheduled for Thursday, December 17, 1998.
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Commissioner Rahn, seconded by Commissioner Nelson, to adjourn the
Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:15
p.m.
Chair
Recorded and transcribed by:
Arlene Bergfalk
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
9 -24 -98
City Council Agenda Item No. 9j
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Brad Hoffman, Community Development Director
I�f
DATE: December 9, 1998
SUBJECT: State Building Code and Permit Fee Structure
Monday evening, the Council will be asked to approve a first reading of an ordinance amending
Chapter 3 of the City Ordinances to adopt the new and most current building code for the State. The
1997 Building Code would replace the 1994 Building Code. Brooklyn Center adopts the code by
reference. All construction in the metro area is subject to the State Code.
Also, Brooklyn Center has adopted the State fee structure for building permits. The resolution would
adopt the fee structure of the 1997 code.
•
MEMO
TO: Brad Hoffman
FROM: David Fisher_
DATE: December 4, 1998
SUBJECT: Resolution Amending Planning and Inspection Fees and an Ordinance Amending
Chapter 3 of the Building Code.
The 1997 State Building Code, which has recently been adopted by the State of Minnesota,
reflects an increase in permit fees. The last permit fee increase for the City of Brooklyn Center
was in 1995. We would like to adopt the 1997 State Building Code permit fees for
implementation by the City.
Attached is a draft resolution amending the current fees for building permit fees and an ordinance
amendment reflecting changes to Chapter 3 of the building code. The resolution should be placed
on the December 14, 1998 City Council agenda for discussion and approval in order to be
• adopted and implemented by January 1, 1999. The ordinance amendment should be presented
for first reading to the City Council on December 14, 1998, with a second reading on January 11,
1999. This would make the ordinance amendment effective on February 19, 1999.
If you need additional information, let me know.
I
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE
Member Debra xilstrom introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 95 -174
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE SCHEDULE FOR PLANNING AND
INSPECTION FEES
WHEREAS, Chapters 3, 12, 15, 34 and 35 of the City Ordinances require the
payment of fees for building permits, plumbing permits, mechanical system permits, building
maintenance and occupancy reinspections, Planning Commission applications, flood plain use
permits, and administrative land use permits; and
WHEREAS, Chapters 3, 12, 15, 34, and 35 of the City Ordinances further
authorize the setting of various fees by City Council resolution; and
WHEREAS, City Council Resolution Nos. 86 -123 (adopted 8/11/86), 89 -224
(adopted 11/27/89), and 90 -33 (adopted 2/26/90), together comprise a schedule of fees
collected by planning and inspection; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it appropriate to modify and update the fees
contained in said resolutions and to adopt a ne%v fee schedule.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center to adopt the following fee schedule:
Planning and Inspection Fee Schedule
I. Building Pe»nit Fees
Building permit fees shall be based on the valuation of each building. The building
valuation shall be computed using the up -to -date average construction cost per
square foot established from time to time by the State Building Inspector.
Valuation Fee
S1 to S1,000 535.00
$ 1,001 to 52,000 S34.75 for the first $1,000 plus 52.75 for each
additional 5100 or fraction thereof, to and including
$2,000
$2,001 to $25,000 $62.25 for the first 52,000 plus $12.50 for each
additional S 1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including
525,000
525,001 to 550,000 $349.75 for the first $25,000 plus 59.00 for each
• additional 51,000 or fraction thereof, to and including
550,000
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE
RESOLUTION NO. 95 -174
s
1.* Building Permit Fees (continued)
Valuation Fee
$50,001 to $100,000 $574.75 for the first $50,000 plus $6.25 for each
additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including
$ 100,000
$100,001 to $500,000 5887.25 for the first 5100,000 plus 55.00 for each
additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including
5500,000
$500,001 to 51,000,000 $2,887.25 for the first $500,000 plus $4.25 for each
additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including
$ 1,000,000
$1,000,000 and up S5,012.25 for the first $1,000,000 plus $2.75 for each
additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
Note: A plan check fee of 32.5clo of the amount of the pennit is collected for one- and
two family residences (including townhouses as one family residences). For all other
permits, the plan check fee is 657c of the amount of the pennit.
2. Plumbing Permit Fees
Plumbing permit fees shall be computed on the basis of the number of plumbing
fixtures and devices and of the type of system or plumbing work as set forth below.
A plumbing fixture is defined as a device intended to be connected to the plumbing
system, such as any sink, bathtub, or any other such device.
Desctzotion and Fee
a. Minimum fee $25.00
b. Plumbing fixtures installed 10.00
C. Plumbing future opening for
future install 6.25
d. Catch basin installed 15.00
C. Water heater installed 10.00
f. Ground run to building 15.00
Cr Rainwater leader 10.00
h. Installation of water treating or
filter device 12.50
i. Potable water well drilling 25.00
j.. Irrigation connection 25.00
k. Sewer or water connection 31.25 /connect.
® 1. Sewer or water disconnection 31.25 /disconnect.
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE
RESOLUTION ti'O. 95 -174
2. Plumbing Permit Fees (continued)
Description and Fee
m. Repair or alteration of existing
plumbing or water distribution
system 39o' of estimated cost
n. New single - family dwelling plumbing
system (including futures, devices,
openings and water piping) 55.00
o. Fire sprinkler system (new)
-First ten heads 40.00
-Additional ten heads or
fraction thereof 8.00
Standpipes (each) 50.00
Fire pump (including testing) 200.00
Alteration, repair of existing system
-For each 5500 valuation or
fraction thereof 17.00
-Minimum fee 35.00
p. A plumbing permit shall be required
for gas piping; the permit fees are
set forth below. (Fees for gas fitting
of appliances and heating systems
are set forth under Mechanical System
Permit Fees contained in this schedule.
Up to 2" diameter pipe:
• 1 -3 openings each 5.75
•E v
-Each additional opening 2.50
3. Mechanical System Permit Fees
Description and Fee
2" and over diameter pipe
.1 -3 openings each 15.00
-Each additional opening 3.25
Mechanical system permit fees shall be calculated and collected according to the
following:
1
-J-
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE I
i RESOLUTION NO. 95 -174
! 3. Mechanical System Permit Fees (continued)
a. Installation, alteration, reconstruction, or repair of any heating, ventilating,
comfort cooling, or refrigeration equipment, shall be computed on the basis
of the estimated cost of the proposed work except as herein provided.
•$0 to $500 $25.00
•$501 to $50,000 $25.00 plus 2% of value of any amount
in excess of $500
-Over $50,000 $1,012.50 plus 1% of value of any
amount in excess of $50,000
b. A mechanical permit shall be required for gas pipe fitting for connection to
any gas burning device, except as herein provided; the fees are set forth
below. (Fees for gas piping are additional and are set forth under Plumbing
System m Per
mit Fees contained in this schedule
The appropriate fee for as water heaters shall be applied to the plumbing
Q
b PP a
P b n
rather than a mechanical permit.
C. A mechanical permit shall be required for the installation, for the removal,
and for the replacement of any in- ground or above- ground tanks or vessels
and related piping used for the storage of gaseous or liquid fuels or
chemicals. Permit fees shall be:
Above - ground new installation $37.50
In- g round new installation 50.00
Above - ground removal 25.00
In- ground removal 37.50
Replace like tank to existing system 37.50
d. It is not intended that permits shall be required for portable heating,
ventilating, comfort cooling, or refrigeration equipment, nor for the
replacement of any component part or assembly of an appliance which does
not alter its original approval and which complies with other applicable
requirements of the Building Code.
-Y-
L t) A'RLiiv I' FL S C HED U L E
RESOLUTION NO. 95 -174
4. Building Maintenance and Occupancy p cy Orduiance Fees
Reinspection 525.00
Appeal 50.00
5. Sign Permit Fees
Sign permit fees shall be collected before issuance of any sign permit required under
the provision of the Sign Ordinance and shall be calculated according to the
following:
0
a. The fee for any permanent freestanding or non - freestanding sign five square
feet in area or less shall be $25.00.
b. The fee for any permanent freestanding or non - freestanding sign over five
square feet in area shall be S30.00 for the first 50 square feet of gross area
or fraction thereof and $12.50 for each additional 50 square feet of gross
area or fraction thereof.
C. The fee for permits for the installation of any electrical wiring for any sign
shall conform to the State Board of Electricity fee schedule and shall be
obtained through the State Board of Electricity.
6. Planning Commission Fees
Planning Commission fees shall be collected at the time applications are executed
according to the following:
Descrintion and Fee
a. Rezoning 5700.00
b. Site and Building Plan 500.00
C. Preliminary Plat 200.00
d. Variance 100.00
e. Special Use Permit 100.00
f. Extension of Special Use Permit 50.00
g. Appeal 100.00
h. Determination 100.00
i. Planned Unit Development 1,200.00
In addition to the above fees, the applicant shall sign an agreement, on forms
provided by the City, to pay the cost of all engineering, planning and legal consulting
expenses incurred by the City in processing the above applications.
-J-
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE
RESOLUTION NO. 95 -174
7. Administrative Land Use Permit Fees
Administrative Land Use Permit fees for temporary activity shall be collected before
the issuance of any such permit required under the provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance according to the following:
Description and Fee
a. Out -of -door church functions, civic
functions, charities, carnivals, etc. 525.00/10 days
b. Off -site signs for civic functions or
community events $25.00/10 days
C. Out -of -door nursery and garden
center sales and displays 550.00/30 weeks
d. Miscellaneous out -of -door sales,
displays or promotional events 525.00/10 days
e. Miscellaneous out -of -door sales,
displays or promotional events for
gasoline service stations 525.00/30 days
f. Car wash fund raisers $25.00/10 days
8. Flood Plain Use Permit Fees
Flood Plain Use Permit fees shall be collected before the issuance of any flood plain
use permit required under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and shall be
calculated according to the following:
Area Fee
Up to 1 acre S 25.00
1 acre to 5 acres 25.00 /acre
Over 5 acres 125.00 plus
18.75 /acre for each acre or fraction thereof over 5 acres
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above schedule of Planning and Inspection fees
shall become effective on August 15, 1995.
August 14, 1995
Date 11aor
-6-
CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE
RESOLUTION NO. 95 -174
ATTEST:
Deputy Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Kristen Mann and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof:
Myrna Kragness, Kristen Mann, Debra Hilstrom, and Kathleen Carmody;
and the following voted against the same: none,
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
-7-
Resolution No. 95 -174 CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE
1994 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE - - - - --- 1 -A
TABLE 1 -A— BUILDING PERMIT FEES -
• TOTA VALUATION !_UATION FEE
S 1.0O to Si00.00 00 i
°�
J. U 1.00 to )2,000.()0 S? 1.00 tier the f irst 5500.00 plus S2.75 for each additional
5100.00, or traction thereof, to and including, S2.000.00
52.001.00 to 525.000.00 S62.25 for the first S' (X)0.00) lus S 1 2.10 ', I
p _ I� r each additional
S 1.000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including S25.000.00
$25.001.00 to S50.000.00 5349.75 for the first 525,000.00 plus 59.00 for each
additional 51,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including, -
550.000.00 `
550,001.00 to S 100.000.00 5574.75 for the first 550.000.00 plus S6?5 for each
additional 51.000.00, or fraction thereof, to and includin,
S 100.000.00 `
5100.001.00 to 5500.000.00 5887.25 for the first 5100.000.(X) plus 55.00 for each
additional S 1,000.00. or fraction thereof', to and including
5500.000.00 `
5500.001.00 to S l .000.000.()0 i i 2 -
S_.yS7.__ for the first 5500.000.00 plus 5.1._a for each
additional S 1.000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including
S 1.000.000.00 -
S 1.000-001.00 and up 55.01 2.' -5 for the first S 1.000.000.00 plus S2.75 for each
additional 51.000.00, or fraction thereof
Other Inspections and Fees:
t
•
I. Inspections outside of normal business hours .... ............................... S - per hour- i
(minimum charge — two hours)
2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of
Section 105.5 .... ............................... S42.00 per hour" 1
. .........................
,. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated ............................. S -12.00 per hour
(minimum charge ---one -half hour)
4. .additional plan - review required by changes. additions
or revisions to plans ......................... ............................... S42.00 per hour�
(minimum charge ---one -half hour) 1
5. For use of outside consultants for plan checking and
i nspections. or both .......................... ............................... actual coy,,, .< .
"Or the total hour(, cost to the jurisdiction. , %hiche%er is the greatest. This cost shall include super. ision.
equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the ernpio�ees involved. -
""actual costs include administrative and overhead costs.
i
ResolutJon No. 95 -174 CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE
1988 EDITION 3 -A
TABLE NO. 3- A— BUILDING PERMIT FEES
. TOTAL VALUATION FEE
S 1.00 to 5500.00 515.00
5501.00 to 52,000.00 515.00 for the first 5500.00 plus 52.00 for each additional
S 100.00 or fraction thereof. to and including 52.000.00
S2,001.00 to 525,000.00 S45.00 for the first 52.000.00 plus 59.00 for each addi-
tional S1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including
S25.000.00 `
52 5.001.00 to 550.000.00 5252.00 for the first 525.000.00 plus 56.50 for each addi-
tional 51.000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including
550.000.00
550,001.00 to S 100,000.00 5414.50 for the first 550.000.00 plus 54.50 for each addi-
tional S 1,000.00 or fraction thereof. to and including
5100.000.00 `
S 100,001.00 to 5500,000.00 5639.50 for the first 5100.000-00 plus 53.50 for each
additional S I.000.00 or fraction thereof
5500.001.00 to 52039.50 for the first 5500.000.00 plus 53.00 for each
51,000.000.00 additional 51,000.00 or fraction thereof. to and including
51.000.000.00.
51.000.001.00 and up 53539.50 for the first S 1.000.000.00 plus 52.00 for each
additional S 1.000.00 or fraction thereof
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal business hours ..................530.00 per hour
(minimum charge —two hours)
2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of
Section 305 (g) ................. .........................530.00 per hour*
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically
.... .................
indicated ..................... .....530.00 per hour*
(minimum charge —one -half hour)
4. Additional plan review required by changes. additions
or revisions to approved plans ..... .........................530.00 per hour`
(minimum charge one -half hour)
*Or the total hourly cost to thejurisdiction. whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include
supervision. overhead. equipment. hourly v ages and fringe benefits of the employees
involved.
19
its adoption: Member introduced the following resolution and moved
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE SCHEDULE FOR BUILDING PERMIT
FEES
WHEREAS, Chapter 3 of the City Ordinances requires the payment of fees for
building permits; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 3 of the City Ordinances further authorizes the setting of
various fees by City Council resolution; and
WHEREAS, City Council Resolution Nos. 86 -123 (adopted 8/11/86), 89 -224
(adopted 11/27/89), 90 -33 (adopted 2/26/90), and 95 -174 (adopted 8/14/95), together comprise
a schedule of fees collected by Community Development; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it appropriate to modify and update the fees
contained in said resolutions and to adopt a new fee schedule.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
r Brooklyn Center to adopt the following fee schedule.
Planning and Inspection Fee Schedule
1. Building Permit Fees
Building permit fees shall be based on the valuations of each building. The building
valuation shall be computed using the up -to -date average construction cost per square
foot established from time to time by the State Building Inspector.
Valuation Fee
$1 to $1,000 $38.75
$1,001 to $2,000 $38.75 for the first $1,000 plus $3.05 for each
additional $100 or fraction thereof, to and including
$2,000
$2,001 to $25,000 $69.25 for the first $2,000 plus $14.00 for each
additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and
including $25,000
$25,001 to $50,000 $391.25 for the first $25,000 plus $10.10 for each
additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and
including $50,000
$50,001 to $100,000 $643.75 for the first $50,000 plus $7.00 for each
additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and
including $100,000
$100,001 to $500,000 $993.75 for the first $100,000 plus $5.60 for each
additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and
including $500,000
$500,000 to $1,000,000 $3,233.75 for the first $500,000 plus $4.75 for each
additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and
including $1,000,000
$1,000,001 and up $5,608.75 for the first $1,000,000 plus $3.65 for
each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof
A plan check fee of 32.5% of the amount of the permit fee is collected for one- and
two - family residences (including townhouses as one - family residences). For all other
permits, the plan check fee is 65 % of the amount of the permit.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
108.8 - 109.6 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
TABLE 1 -A
reinspection fee in accordance with Table I -A or as set forth in the 1. 'rite building permit number.
fce schedule adopted by the jurisdiction. 2. The address of the building.
in instances where reinspection fees have been assessed, no The name and address of the owner.
additional inspection of the work will be performed until the re-
quired fees have been paid. 4. A description of that portion of the building for which the
certificate is issued.
SECTION 109 - CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 5. A statement that the described portion of the building has
been inspected for compliance with the requirements of this code
109.1 Use and Occupancy. No building or structure shall be for the group and division of occupancy and the use for which the
used or occupied, and no change in the existing occupancy classi- proposed occupancy is classified.
fication of a building or structure or portion thereof shall be made 6. The name of the building official.
until the building official has issued a certificate of occupancy
therefor as provided herein. 109.4 Temporary Certificate. If the building official finds that
EYCEI'TION: Group R, Division 3 and Group U Occupancies. no substantial hazard will result from occupancy of any building
or portion thereof before the same is completed, a temporary cer-
Issuance of a certificate of occupancy shall not be construed as tificate of occupancy may be issued for the use of a portion or por-
an approval of a violation of the provisions of this code or of other tions of a building or structure prior to the completion of the entire
ordinances of the jurisdiction. Certificates presuming to give au- building or structure.
thority to violate or cancel the provisions of :his code or other ordi-
nances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. 109.5 Posting. The certificate of occupancy shall be posted in a
conspicuous place on the premises and shall not be removed ex-
109.2 Change in Use. Changes in the character or use of a build- cept by the building official.
ing shall not be made except as specified in Section 3405 of this
code. 109.6 Revocation. The building official may, in writing, sus-
pend or revoke a certificate of occupancy issued under the provi-
109.3 Certificate Issued. After the building official inspects the sions of this code whenever the certificate is issued in error, or on
building or structure and finds no violations of the provisions of the basis of incorrect information supplied, or when it is deter -
this code or other laws that are enforced by the code enforcement mined that the building or structure or portion thereof is in viola -
agency, the building official shall issue a certificate of occupancy tion of any ordinance or regulation or any of the provisions of this
that shalt contain the following: code.
i
TABLE 1 -A- BUILDING PERMIT FEES
- - __ FEE - --
TOTAL VALUATION
$1.00 to $500.00 _.. _. .. _. .._ $ ? _
$501.00 to $2,000.00 23 q
3 50
$ 0 for the first $500-00 0 plus $3.05 for each additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and
includin g $2,000.00
$2,001.00 to $25,000.00 a or the first $2,00 0 .00 plus $14.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to
i $25,000.00
$25,001.00 to $50,000 .00
$391.75 for the first $25,000.00 plus $10.10 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof,
to and including
$50,000.00
$50,001.00 to $100,000.00 _
75 for the first $50,000 $10, 0 p lus $7.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof,
to and including $
64�
loo noo nn
$993.7S for the first
$ 100,00 1.00 to $500,000.00 ..... - U0 plus $5.60 for r each additional $1,000.0. 00, or fraction
thereof,
to and including $500,000.00
$500,001.00 to $ 1,00 $3 0 00 p 0,000.00 " 6 f , t o and in lus $4.75 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction
thereor g 1 000 .00
$1,000,001.00 and u , S s first $1 0
000 00 plus $3.65 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction
thereof
-- -
Other Inspections and Fees . _.... . .... .....
_.
1. inspections outside of normal business hours ........................................ ............................... $47.00 per hours
(minimum charge -two hours)
2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 305.8 ........................... ............................... $47.00 per hours
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated .................................. ............................... $47.00 per hours
(minimum charge -one -half hour)
4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to plans ........... ............................... I .... $47.00 per hours
(minimum charge -one -half hour)
5. For use of outside consultants for plan checking and inspections, or both .... .... .... ...... ...... ........ Actual costs
'Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision. overhead, equipment hourly wages and fringe benefits of
the employees involved.
2 Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs.
1-6
i
City Council Agenda Item No. 9k
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 11th day of January, 1999,
at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle
Creek Parkway, to consider an amendment to Chapter 3 of the Brooklyn Center Code of
Ordinances regarding the Minnesota State Building Code.
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in
advance. Please contact the City Clerk at 569 -3300 to make arrangements.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES
REGARDING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 3 -101 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center
is hereby amended in the following manner:
Section 3 -101
• A. The following chapters of the +994 Minnesota State Building Code are
adopted and incorporated as part of the building code for the City of Brooklyn Center:
3. 1302 - State Building Construction Approvals
4. 1305 - Adoption of the +994 1997 Uniform Building Code including
Appendix Chapters:
6. 1315 - Adoption of the 4993 National Electrical Code
14. +3 - Stio Yv Loads
B. The following optional appendix chapters of the 1994 1997 Uniform
Building Code are hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the building code for the City
of Brooklyn Center:
Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty
days following its legal publication.
• 1
Adopted this day of , 1999.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
(Strikeouts indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.)
i
• 2
City Council Agenda Item No. 91
s
•
City of Brooklyn Center
A great place to start. A great place to stay.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk J - Yv�
DATE: December 10, 1998
SUBJECT: An Ordinance Amending Chapter 7 of the City Ordinances Relating to Storage of
Refuse Containers
At its November 23, 1998, meeting, the City Council received information from Neighborhood
Liaison Heather Ruzick regarding placement of refuse containers. It was Council consensus to
amend the City Ordinance to include Ms. Ruzick's recommendation.
An ordinance amendment has been drafted to incorporate Ms. Ruzick's recommendation and is
included on the December 14, 1998, City Council agenda.
Attachments
6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 • City Hall & TDD Number (612) 569 -3300
Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number (612) 569 -3400 • FAX (612) 569 -3494
An Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunities Employer
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 11 th day of January, 1999, at 7
p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek
Park,,vay, to consider An Ordinance Amending Chapter 7 of the City Ordinances Relating to
Storaffe of Refuse Containers.
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in
advance. Please contact the City Clerk at 569 -3300 to make arrangements.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES
RELATING TO STORAGE OF REFUSE CONTAINERS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Brooklyn Center City Code Section 7 -102 is amended as follows:
Section 7 -102. REFUSE STORAGE AND DISPOSAL.
Subdivision 4. Placing of Containers. The cent in th„ rzdr
C P" il - ii3es or o ,. f v ie w f.0 +
r �i « i - ft -* F
he prc�llises Containers must be placed
behind the front setback of the residence placed in a garage located on the premises, except
as may be reasonable and immediately necessary for collection. In no event may containers be
placed or maintained in a way that unreasonably interferes with the use of adjoining property.
Containers kept outside must be placed in a manner that does not permit entry of or harborage
for animals, insects or other vermin, or permit the container to be tipped over. Containers must
be maintained in a reasonable clean condition at all times.
Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and thirty days
following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of , 1999.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
Strikeout indicates smatter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.)
November 18, 1998
• Subject: Placement of Refuse Containers
It is common practice of the citizens of Brooklyn Center to store refuse containers on the side of
their house or garage. Occasionally I receive a complaint from a citizen because a neighbor's
container is in view from the front street. When looking into these complaints, I send letters to
everyone in the area as everyone keeps containers out next to their home or garage.
The container issue has generated an overwhelming amount of complaints from the citizens in
favor of keeping their containers nest to their home or garage. Citizens state that they have had
their containers next to their home or garage for 15, 20 plus years and this is the first time they
have been told to move their containers to the rear of the house or place it in the garage. These
citizens state they take pride in their property and do not see their container next to their home as
a problem. Many citizens have asked if this is a new ordinance and why am I enforcing such an
issue when there are more serious issues to handle.
Common reasons as to why citizens place their containers next to their home or garage are as
follows: No room in the garage for a container or simply not having a garage, container is not
easily accessible if kept outside behind the house, the elderly cannot physically move containers
far distances, requires shoveling an extra path in the winter. Many citizens have stated that they
do not see this as a problem unless people have overflowing garbage that is blowing around the
neighborhood. I have only received a few complaints of this nature. For the most part, citizens
that have containers out in view have them next to their residence and they are very neat in
appearance. The containers have lids and garbage generally is not overflowing.
As an example, during a recent code sweep of a particular neighborhood, I generated 125 letters
for code violations. Of the 125 violations, 97 were for container placement only - no other
violations were found for those 97 properties. I discovered that containers in almost all instances
were next to the house or garage - in view from the front street area. Virtually none of the
containers have overflowing garbage and virtually all were neat in appearance with lids. No one
had containers strewn about the yard or left at the end of the driveway. Of the 28 remaining
letters that were sent, 20 had other violations in addition to container placement. The bottom line,
only 8 residences of the 125 had containers stored from view.
The time that is being spent on computer entries, letters and reinspection for container placement
only, is taking away valuable time from focusing on more serious issues. This issue is also
generating a lot of negative feedback from citizens.
I would like to purpose that Section 7 -102 Subdivision 4 be revised. I would like to change the
first sent ence only to read something «
a
a
s follows: "Containers must be placed behind the front
setback of the residence or in the garage." - as opposed to being placed" in the rear of the
premises out of view from the street in front of the residence." (See diagram). Virtually everyone
places containers in view from the front street area and to date it has been a losing battle trying to
get containers moved so they comply with the current container p y nt finer ordinance. The few complaints I
have received in favor of the ordinance do not compare with all those in favor of keeping
containers next to their home provided they are kept in a sanitary fashion, which most have been.
Thank you for your consideration of this proposed ordinance change.
Heather Ruzick
Neiahborhood Liaison
a
• i •
3 14
-T
t+LS
d �it`riN3i1 - yNavl��v�r)
r�, {oJ
i
dealing in or handling meat, fowl, fruit, grain, or v egetables; offal, animal excreta, or the carcass of
1 animals; brick, plaster, wood, metal or other waste matter resulting from the demolition, alteration or
construction of buildings or strictures; accumulated waste materials, cans, containers, junk vehicles,
ashes. tires, junk:, or other such substance which may become a nuisance, but not including recyclable
materials.
Subdivision 22. Rubbish is nonputrescible solid wastes such as wood, leaves, trimming from
s hrubs, de ad trees or branches thereof, shavings. sawdust, excelsior, wooden waste, printed matter,
s, and all other combustibles not
paper, paper board, pasteboard, grass, rags, straw, boots, shoes, hat
included under the term garbage, but not including recyclable materials.
Subdivision 23. Sill includes that particular garbage which is wholly or nearly edible and
usable as a food and has food value for animals or fowl, accumulating from animal, vegetable or other
matter wasted from clubs, hotels, hospitals, restaurants, and public eating places.
Subdivision 24. Vehicle is every device in, upon, or by which any person or property is or may
be transported or drawn upon a thoroughfare including devices used exclusively upon stationary rails
or tracks.
Subdivision 2 5. Waste ytatter is nonputrescible solid waste such as soil, earth, sand, clay, gravel,
loam, stone. brick. plaster, crockery, glass. glassware, ashes, cinders, shells, metal, and other
noncombustible material which has
been or is to be discar ded, but not including recyclable materials. ..
Subdivision 26. Yard Waste has
the meaning given it in 'NIlinnesota Statutes,
Section 115A.931.
�Lt r /1 r
Section 7 -102. REFUSE STORAGE AND DISPOSAL.
Subdivision I. Containers Required. The owner of any premises, and any other person having
refuse as herein defined, must provide and keep on such premises sufficient containers for the storage
of or collection. Each container must be
refuse accumulated on the premises between disposal
watertight. must have a tight fitting lid, must be impervious to insects. rodents, vermin, and absorption
•+ authorized writing
�a �� s.. s a.zthorized in
r � may not exceed �0 gallons in sip.. unless othe. 7 p
. moisture and m _
o ,
by the health authority. �
i
f Alt refuse on any premises must be stored in required containers unless it is immediately
consume or disposed of on the premises in an approved incinerator.
All co=ercial. business, industrial, r other such estabiis'nrnents having a refuse voltune in
excess of two CUD1C yards per week, and all six - family and larger dwellings. must provide approved
bulk or bps - c\ p.- refuse storage containers or approved equivalent. The containers must be located so
as to be accessible to collection equipment and so aS not to rcouir an interme",at transfer.
7-1
. ,. i.. i... .i. .i .i. u. I, . I N I..I I NJ J I I NY 110.uiiul.i..6.11 i
Subdivision 2. Sanitary Disposal. All refuse must be disposed of in a sanitary manner as
approved by the health authority and may not constitute a nuisance. P\efuse may not be composted or
buried except that composting in an approved rodent and fly proof device and/or filling operations
using approved fill materials and methods may be permitted. In no case may garbage be composted
or buried.
Subdivision 3. Frequency and Manner of Collection. The contents of the containers must be
collected once every week, or more frequently if necessary or required by the provisions of any other
ordinance of the City, by a collector licensed under this Chapter. The collector must transfer the
contents of the containers to the collection vehicle without spilling them, and if anv spilling occurs, the
collector must clean it up immediately and completely. Collection must be conducted in a manner as
to not create a nuisance. Collection in residential zones must be between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and
S:30 p.m. Upon each collection the containers must be completely emptied and returned to the racks
or stands where they are kept, and the lids of the containers must be replaced.
Subdivision 4. Placing of Containers. The containers must be placed in the rear of the premises \
or out of view from the street in front of the premises 'or placed in a garage located on the premises,
-except as may be reasonable and immediately necessary for collection -In no event may containers be
placed or maintained in a way that unreasonably interferes with the use of adjoining property.
Containers kept outside must be placed in a manner that does not permit entry of or harborage for
animals, insects or other vermin, or permit the container to be tipped over. Containers must be
maintained in a reasonable clean condition at all times.
Subdivision 5. Defective Containers. If. upon inspection by the health authority, a container is
found to be in poor repair, corroded or otherwise defective so as to permit insects, vermin or rodents
to enter, or does not meet other requirements of this ordinance, the health authority may require the
container to be repaired or replaced by notifying the provider or user of the container of the deficiency
and stating a compliance date in the notice. If the deficiency is not corrected by the compliance date,
the health authority may condemn the deficient container and affix a tag so stating such condemnation.
It is unlaxfLil for any person to place or deposit refuse in a container which has been condemned.
Subdivision 6. Preparation of Yard Wastes. Yard wastes must be bagged separately from other
oarbaQe, refuse, and waste matter and must be placed 3 to 6 feet from garbage and other refuse on
collection day.
Section 7 -10 REF USE HkULERS REGULATIONS.
Subdivision 1. "License Required. No person may haul or convey refuse from any premises in
the City, other than the person's own domicile, unless the person holds a valid license. A license is
required for each vehicle used to haul or convey refuse.
,s
City Council Agenda Item No. 9m
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Brad Hoffman, Community Development Director
U
DATE: December 9, 1998
SUBJECT: Earle Brown Heritage Center Bid Packages
Public bids were sought for thirteen (13) different bid packages representing the total construction
package for the expansion of the Heritage Center. The expansion included the construction of the
G Barn, the conversion of the H Barn to meeting space, structural repairs to the D Barn and links
connecting the various meeting rooms at the Center.
Attached is the letter of recommendation form E & V, the construction manager along with the
individual bid tabulations for each bid package. The Council should note that the bid of Shaw
Contract Carpeting is $440 higher than BLS Carpeting. However, BLS failed to provide a bid bond,
a bid requirement, with their bid. Previously, the Council rejected a concrete bid for the foundation
• work for the same reason. We are recommending the bid of Shaw.
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Manager be authorized to enter into agreements with the
thirteen (13) recommended low bidders.
At this time, staff and the construction manager have negotiated approximately $95,000 in change
order deducts. Contracts with the individual subcontractors would reflect those change orders and
would reduce the base bid amount accordingly.
- —_ December 1, 1998
E Q \ J Consultants and
a y Construction Managers
City Council Members
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy.
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Re: Earle Brown Heritage Center - Building Additions and Renovations
Bid Package #2: Remaining Work
Recommendation for Award
Dear Council Members:
The bids received on November 18, 1998 for Bid Package #2: Remaining Work for the building
additions and renovations at the Earle Brown Heritage Center have been tabulated and reviewed.
At this time we are recommending that contracts be awarded for the bid divisions listed below. It
is the joint award recommendation of E &V Consultants and Construction Managers and
Blumentals /Architecture, Inc. that contracts be issued to the following contractors:
Bid Division 3031 -EB: BuildinQ and Site Concrete
Duncan Concrete Inc.
Route 1 Box 234
Browerville, Minnesota 56438
Base Bid for Bid Division 3031 -EB $48,600.00
Alternate No. 1 $0.00
Alternate No. 4 $0.00
PLM Bond Included in Base Bid
Total Base Contract Amount $48,600.00
Bid Division 3061 -EB: Camentry and Demolition
GEH Construction, Inc.
601 Lewis Avenue North
Watertown, Minnesota 55388
Base Bid for Bid Division 3061 -EB $394,000.00
Alternate No. 1 $2,000.00
Alternate No. 4 $0.00
PLM Bond Included in Base Bid
Total Base Contract Amount $396,000.00
5801 Duluth Street • Suite 345 • Minneapolis., MN 55422
Phone 612/545 -1355 • Fax 612/545 -1346
Equal Opportunity Employer
Letter of Recommendation
• Earle Brown Heritage Center — Bid Pack 42
December 1, 1998
Page 2
Bid Division 3071 -EB: EPDM and Metal Roofing
Top -All Roofing, Inc.
500 Como Avenue
St. Paul, Minnesota 55103
Base Bid for Bid Division 3071 -EB $59,510.00
Alternate No. 1 $0.00
Alternate No. 4 $0.00
PLM Bond Included in Base Bid
Total Base Contract Amount $59,510.00
Bid Division 3081 -EB: Aluminum. Glass and Glazing
Empirehouse, Inc.
1055 North Fifth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411
Base Bid for Bid Division 3081 -EB $119,759.00
Alternate No. 1 ($7,717.00)
Alternate No. 4 $0.00
PLM Bond Included in Base Bid
Total Base Contract Amount $112,042.00
Bid Division 3082 -EB: Hollow Metal, Wood Door. & Hardware - Supt)ly
K &K Sales Inc.
8626 Xylon Court North, Suite 104
Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55445
Base Bid for Bid Division 3082 -EB $29,146.00
Alternate No. 1 $0.00
Alternate No. 4 $0.00
PLM Bond Included in Base Bid
Total Base Contract Amount $29,146.00
i
Letter of Recommendation
Earle Brown Herita (le Center- Bid Pack 92
December 1, 1998
Paae 3
Bid Division 3091A -EB: Carnet and Resilient Floorin-1
Shaw Contract Flooring
151 Cheshire Lane, Suite 500
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
Base Bid for Bid Division 3091 A -EB $50,800.00
Alternate No. 1 $0.00
Alternate No. 4 $1,714.00
PLM Bond Included in Base Bid
Total Base Contract Amount $52,514.00
Bid Division 3091B -EB: Hard Tile
Grazzini Brothers and Company
1 175 Eagan Industrial Blvd.
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
! Base Bid for Bid Division 3091 B -EB $26,995.00
Alternate No. 1 $0.00
Alternate No. 4 ($8,625.00)
PLM Bond Included in Base Bid
Total Base Contract Amount $1 8,370.00
Bid Division 3092 -EB: Acoustical Ceilings
Twin City Acoustics
8731 Bass Lake Road
New Hope, Minnesota 55428
Base Bid for Bid Division 3092 -EB $3,965.00
Alternate No. 1 $0.00
Alternate No. 4 $0.00
PLM Bond Included in Base Bid
Total Base Contract Amount $3,965.00
Letter of Recommendation
Earle Brown heritage Center — Bid Pack 92
December 1, 1998
Page 4
Bid Division 3093 -EB: Paintin-.
Wasche Commercial Finishes, Inc.
14735 Hwy 65 NE
Ham Lake, Minnesota 55304
Base Bid for Bid Division 3093 -EB $36,688.00
Alternate No. 1 $0.00
Alternate No. 4 $0.00
PLM Bond Included in Base Bid
Total Base Contract Amount $36,688.00
Bid Division 3101 -EB: Ooerable Foldin; Partitions
Mahin -Walz, Inc.
4550 Quebec Avenue North
New Hope, Minnesota 55428
e Base Bid for Bid Division 3101 -EB $31,458.00
Alternate No. 1 $0.00
Alternate No. 4 $0.00
PLM Bond Included in Base Bid
Total Base Contract Amount $31,458.00
Bid Division 3151 -EB: Plumbin(z and HVAC
Newman Mechanical, Inc.
1400 East Hwy. 36
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Base Bid for Bid Division 3151 -EB $291,000.00
Alternate No. 1 $0.00
Alternate No. 4 $0.00
PLM Bond Included in Base Bid
Total Base Contract Amount $291.000.00
Letter of Recommendation
Earle Brown Fleritaye Center — Bid Pack 42
December 1, 1998
Page 5
Bid Division 3152 -EB: Fire Protection
Fire -Guard Sprinkler
2055 White Bear Avenue North, Suite C
St. Paul, Minnesota 55109
Base Bid for Bid Division 3152 -EB $24,640.00
Alternate No. 1 $0.00
Alternate No. 4 $0.00
PLM Bond Included in Base Bid
Total Base Contract Amount $24,6=10.00
Bid Division 3161 -EB: Electrical
Weber Electric, Inc.
577 Shoreview Park Road
Shoreview, Minnesota 55126
Base Bid for Bid Division 3161 -EB $131,900.00
Alternate No. 1 $0.00
Alternate No. 4 $0.00
PLM Bond Included in Base Bid
Total Base Contract Amount $131,900.00
Upon approval, E &V Consultants and Construction Managers will issue Letters of Intent and
Contracts.
Very truly yours,
E &V CONSULTANTS AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
Mike Farmer
Project Manager
cc: Brad Hoffman — City of Brooklyn Center
Janis Blurnentals— Blumentals /Architecture. Inc.
E V, Incorporated
OWNER: City of Brooklyn Center Bid Date: November 18, 1998 DATE 12/01/98
PROJ.: Earle Brown Heritage Center Additions and Renovations REV. #_: 1
LOC.: Brooklyn Center, Minnesota PROJ.# : 9913
TITLE: Cumulative Bid Summary: Bid Package #2 FILE# BidSum
BID BASE ALTERNATES
DIVISION # BID DIVISION NAME 1 LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER_ ( BID AMOUNT I No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4
1 3031 -EB 1 Building and Site Concrete ( Duncan Concrete, Inc. $48,600 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $000
3061 -EB 1 Carpentry and Demolition 1 GEH Construction, Inc. $394,000 $2,000.00 ($1,500,00) ($1,500.00) $000
3071 -EB 1 EPDM and Metal Roofing ( Top -All Roofing, Inc. 1 $59,510 1 $0.00 1 $0.00 $0.00 $000
1 3081 -EB 1 Aluminum, Glass, and Glazing 1 Empirehouse, Inc. 1 $119,759 1 ($7,717.00)1 $0.00 $0.00 $000
3082 -EB Hollow Metal, Door, Hardware 1 K &K Sales, Inc. 1 $29,146 1 1 $0.00 i $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
3091A -EB 1 Carpet and Resilient Flooring 1 Shaw Contract Flooring 1 $50,800 1 $0.00 1 $0.00 $0.00 $1,714.00
30918 -EB 1 Hard Tile 1 Grazzini Brothers & Company 1 $26,995 1 $0.00 ( $0.00 $0.00 ($8,62500)
1 3092 -EB 1 Acoustical Ceilings 1 Twin City Acoustics ( $3,965 1 1 $0.00 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
3093 -EB 1 Painting Wasche Commercial Finishes 1 $36,688 1 $0.00, $000 $0.00 $0.00
3101 -EB ( Operable Folding Partitions I Mahin -Walz, Inc. 1 $31,458 1 $0.00 ($15,729.00) ($15,729.00) $0.00
1 3151 -EB 1 Plumbing and HVAC 1 Newman Mechanical, Inc. ( $291,000 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
3152 -EB I Fire Protection 1 Fire -Guard Sprinkler ( $24,640 1 $0.00 i $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
3161 -EB I Electrical 1 Weber Electric, Inc. 1 $131,900 1 1 $0.00 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
- SUB- TOTALS $1,248,461 1 1 ($5,71711 ($17,229)1 ($17,229)1 ($6,911)
Description of Alternates:
Alternate 1: Omit glass and aluminum framing above operable partitions (2 thus) in "H" Barn and replace this enclosure above with gypsum board walls.
Alternate 2: Omit south operable folding partition in "H" Barn. This includes omitting beam for this partition and enclosures at both ends and gypsum wall above.
Alternate 3: Omit north operable folding partition in "H" Barn. This includes omitting beam for this partition and enclosures at both ends and gypsum wall above.
Alternate 4: Omit porcelain ceramic floor tile in the following concourses and break -out rooms; 110, 114, and 123.
E &V Consultants and Construction Managers
Owner: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Project: EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER - ADDITIONS / RENOVATIONS
E &V Project No.: 9913
1111) PACKAGE NO. 2 - BID TA1111LATION
1111) DATE: November 18, 1998
BID DIVISION NO. 3031 -EIS: BUILDING & SITE CONCRETE
6% Addendum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
Bid 1 3 Base Bid Combined Bid Alternate #2 Alternate #4
CONTRACTOR Bond 2 I Deduct COMMENTS
CONS TRIVIIONCONCITTS x x
3113 Lynn Avenue South, Suite 100 x x $56,070.00
SL Louis Park MN 55416
1)UNCAN CONCUFTI{, INC. X
Rouse 1, Box 234 x x $4$,600.00
Bogy erville 6.1 N 56438
KELLING ON CONS 'I RUCT10N, INC. x x
20110AUGFRAVI.'NtIF x X $84,500.00
C'ORCORAN, MN 55340
LAND1301W x SONS, INC. x x
19511 LBYTE S I RFET x X $53,900.00 ($10,000.00)
FAST II I ILL MN 55092 3031 & 3061
SCANDY CONCRE I E x x
328 East I lennepin Avenue, Suite 220 x x $52,300.00
Mioncapolis MN 55414
SPRAUNCGI. CONS] RUCTION x x
3025 l larbor Lane, Suite 117 x x $56,900,00
Plymouth MN 55447
WI IVIIFR CONSTRUCTION I x x
9855 West 78111 Slice[, I'O Box 270 x x $75,000.00
Minneapolis MN 55344
WV. NELSON I x x
4205 Pilot Knob Road x � x $62,000.00
Fagan NIN 55122
NORTI ILAND CONCRETE x x
12026 Riveiwood Drive x x
$81 ,000.00
Burnsville MN 55337
0 9 0
E &V Consultants and Construction Managers
Owner: CITY Or 111100KLYN CENTER
Project: EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CEN'T'ER - ADDITIONS / RENOVATIONS
E&V Project No.: 9913
BID PACKAGE NO. 2 - $ID TABULATION
IIID DATE: November 18, 1998
1311) DIVISION NO. 3061 -101: CAIWENI'RY & DEINIOLITION
6% Addendum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
Bid 1 3 Base Bid Combined Bid Alternate #2 Alternate #4
CONTRACTOR Bond 2 1 Deduct COMMENTS
CBS CONS I RUCTION f x x $2,400.00 ($800.00)
7062 BROOKLYN BLVD. x ( X $435,360.00
($50Q00) NA
BROOKLYN CEN "IIiR, MN 55429
VVI TCI I[R CONS 'I RUCTION x x
9855 West 78th Street, 1'0 Box 270 x X $471,000.00
Minneapolis MN 55344
KLLLINGTON CONS I R U C I ION, INC. x X $8.1)00.00
20110 AUGER AVFNUIi x x $710,000.00
CORCORAN, MN 55340
GFII CONS'I RUCTION x x 52,1100.00 (51,500.00)
601 LENVIS x x $394,000.00 (51,5011.00)
\VATERTOwN MN 55388
GLADS I ONE CONSTRUCTION x x
1315 Frost Avenue x x $516,830.00
St. I'aul M N 55109
LUND MARTIN CONSTRUCTION x x $2,200.00 ($2,300.00)
3023 Randolph St. NE x x $419,000.00 ($1,800.00)
Minneapolis MN 55418 1
LANDBORU & SONS, INC. ( x }(
314" OSB IN LIEU OF
19511 LEYTESTREI �r x x $419,000.00 ($10,000.00) PLYWOOD DI-DUCT
EAST13ET1IFI. NIN 55092 3031 &3061 (S5,400.00)
0 0 0
E &V Consultants and Construction Managers
Owner: CITY OF BROOKLYN CEN`T'ER
Project: EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER - ADDITIONS / RENOVATIONS
E&V Project No.: 9913
BID PACKAGE NO. 2 - III D TAIIIILATION
1111) DATE: November 18, 1998
1111) DIVISION NO. 3071 -1 ?11: EPDN1 AND METAL ROOFING
5% Addendum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
CONTRACTOR Bond 2 1 3 Base Bid Combined Deduct COMMENTS
.Alternate #2 Alternate #4 COMMENTS
COMMERCIAL ROOFING x x
3134 Calirorina St. x X $84,481.00
Minneapolis MN 55418
TOP ALL ROOFING x x
SIIO Comm Avenue X x $59,SIO.OU + I `
St. Paul 111N 55103 III
ROSFINQUISI ROt)FING x x
25 X x $68,300.00
\11NNLA MN 55406
lilt) DIVISION NO. 3081 -1:n: ALUMINUM, GLASS, & GLAZING
5% Addendum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
Bid 1 3 Base Bid Combined Bid Alternate #2 Alternate #4
CONTRACTOR Bond 2 I Deduct COMMENTS
EMPIREIIOUSE x x (57,717.00)
1055 Norm sun street x x $119,759.00
Minneapolis MN 55411
MULCAHY X X
($7,063.00) SUBSTITUTE CN11 i
5232 OLFNIWOOK AVENUE NORTH x x $139,100.00 ( b1ATERIAL DEDUCT
PLYMOUTH N1N 55128 ' I (515,000)
0 0 0
E &V Consultants and Construction Managers
Owner: CITY Of BROOKLYN CENTER
Project: EAl2LE BROWN If E12ITAGE CENTER - ADDITIONS / RENOVA'T'IONS
E&V Project No.: 9913
1111) PACKAG E NO. 2 - IIID TA 13U LATION
BID IIATL: November 18, vom
till) DIVISION NO. 3082 -1 11.M., WOOD DOOR, & FINISH IIARIAVARE- SUPPLY
5% Addendum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
CONTRACTOR B i d 2 , 3 Base Bid Combined Deduct COMMENTS
Alternate #2 Alternate #4
COMMENTS
K &KSALF.S x x
4800 NORTH I,II AC AVFNUI: x X $29,146.00
BROOKLYNCEN'11;R NIN 55429
KP.NDALL DOOR cX IIARDWARE X X
222 East Second Street S x $35,835.00
1Vinona MN 55987
BID DIVISION NO. 3091A- 1•:11: CARPET & RESILIENT FLOORING
5% Addendum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
Bid 1 3 Base Bid Combined Bid Alternate #2 Alternate #4
CONTRACTOR Bond 2 I Deduct COMMENTS
FLOORS 131' BLUK116, INC x X
805 FIRS F S CRI;F I* NW x X $57,350.00 $3,801.58
NFW BRIGI ITON, MN 55112
SI1:11V CON'1T2AC1' FLOORING x x
151 CIIESIIIRE LANE, SUITE 500 x x $50,800.00 I $1,714.00
PLYNIOUr11, NIN 55441
BLS CARPET X X
601 CAMPUS DRIVE, SUITE 9 X $50,360.00
NEW BRIGI ITON MN 55112
JERRY'S 1-1,001z S10RE X X
1550 NE IIWY 10 x X $60,620.00 $4,205.00
SPRING LAKE PARK MN 55432
S'I. PAUL I.INOLEUNI AND CARPE I I x x
2956 CENTFR COURT x X ( $52,730.00
$3,117.00
EiAGAN MN 55121 -1257
E &V Consultants n Construction Managers
Owner: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Project: EARLE BROWN IfERITACE CENTER - ADDITIONS / RENOVATIONS
E &V Project No.: 9913
HID PACKAGE NO. 2 - I31I) AIJULATION
I31D DATE: November 18, 1998
1311) DIVISION NO. 309113 - 1 HARD "I]LE.
5% Addendum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
Bid 1 3 Base Bid Combined Bid Alternate #2 Alternate #4
CONTRACTOR Bond 2 1 Deduct COMMENTS
LAND 01: LAKES ILF CO. ( x x
5215 Wes[ Broadway x X $29,452.00 ($9,990.00)
Minneapolis MN 55429
GRA"ZZINI BROTHERS & COMPANY x x
1200 west 79th street x X ' $26,995.00 (S8,625.00)
Minneapolis NIN 55420
1111) DIVISION NO. 3092 -E13: ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE
5% Addendum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
CONTRACTOR Bond 2 I 3 Base Bid Combined Deduct Bid Alternate #2 Alternate #4
COMMENTS
TANNINGS ACOUS4ICS, INC. I x x
301 GriITi1 SOeet x X $5,300.00
ilupkins MN 55343
NOR 'r1(LAND ACOUS rICS x x
8862 Zealaml Ave. N. x X $4,000.00
13rookl Y n Park MN 55445
T1VIN CITY ACOUS'T'ICS x x
8731 Bass Lake Road x x 53,965.00
New Hope NIN 55428
0 0 0
E &V Consultants and Construction Managers
Owner: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Project: EARLE 13ROWN HERITAGE CENTER - ADDITIONS / RENOVATIONS
E&V Project No.: 9913
BID PACKAGE NO. 2 - III D TAIfULATION
IIID U:VII ": Novewber 18, 1998
fill) DIVISION NO. 3093-Ell: PAINTING
5% Addendum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
Bid 1 3 Base Bid Combined Bid Alternate #2 Alternate #4
CONTRACTOR Bond 2 1 Deduct I COMMENTS
wnsnCE INTERIORS `C X NC NC
14735111VY 65 NE x x 836,688.011 � NC NC
IIAM LAKE. N1N 55304
FRANSENDECORA "PING X X $1,050.00 ($400.00)
214 Isl Street west x X $40,914.00 ($650.00) NC
Milaca MN 56351 -
KEN I S "I'EAKNS DECORAI ING X X $1,000.00 ($500.00)
9100 W. 131,00MINUI ON PVVY, S'I 1: 140A x X $55,500.00 ($500.00)
BLOOMINGTON MN 55431
1311) DIVISION NO. 3101 -Ell: OPERABLE', FOLDING PARTITIONS
5 %u Addendum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
Bid 1 3 Base Bid Combined Bid Alternate #2 Alternate #4
CONTRACTOR Bond 2 I Deduct COMMENTS
W.L. I IALL CO X X ($22,000.00)
14800 MARTIN DRIVE X X $46,665.00 ($21
FDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344
NIAnbNAVALZINC K \ ' ($15,729.00)
4550 Ell FC AVE N. x X $31,458.(1(1 (SIi,729,00)
PLYMOUTH, NIN 55442
ACOUSTICS ASSOCIAI F S, INC. X X ($16,923.00)
1250 Zane Ave. N- x X $33,950.00 ($16,923.00)
Minneapolis MN 55422
0 0 0
E &V Consultants and Construction Managers
Owner: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Project: EARL,E BROWN HERITAGE CENTER - ADDITIONS / RENOVATIONS
E&V i'roject No.: 9913
1111) PACKAGE' NO. 2 - III I) TABULATION
BID DATE: November 18, 1998
BID DIVISION NO. 3151 -1:3: PLUMBING & IIVAC
5% Addendum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
CONTRACTOR B
Bid 1 ond 2 I 3 Base Bid Com bined Deduct Alternate #2 Alternate #4
COMMENTS
GENERAL SI IFFF METAL CO ( x X
2330 Louisiana Avenue Y X $293,369.00
Minneapolis NIN 55427
NFWMECII MF('lIANICAI. �
1633 Fustis Street $298,600.00
St. Paul MN 55108
N EWN I A N IN I ECI IA N I CA 1, X X
14001 ".I [is y36 X x 5291,000.110
INlAPLEAVOOD IN N 55109
NORTI ILAND ME(] IANICAI, x x
2900 Nevada Ave. Nopih X X $3 14,440.00
Minneapolis MN 55427
1' AND D MECI IANICAL X X
4629 41 st Avenue Not Ili X X $339,645.00
Robbinsdale MN 55422
CONRAD titGC11ANICAL x x
509 First St. NE X X $298,780.00
Minneapolis MN 55431
SUN NIECI IANICAL x x
14329 Nonhdale Blvd. X X $292,500.00
Roger KIN 55374
0 0
E &V Consultants and Construction Managers
Owner: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Project: LARLE BROWN IIERUfAGE CEN'T'ER - ADDITIONS / RENOVA'T'IONS
E &V Project No.: 9913
1311) PACKAGE NO. 2 - IIID TABULATION
BID DATL: November 18, 1998
1311) DIVISION NO. 3151-Ell: PLUMBING & IIVAC
b% Addendum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
Bid CONTRACTOR Bond 2 ') 3 Base Bid Combined Deduct Alternate #2 Alternate #4 COMMENTS
MIS N4ECIIANICAL x x
7160 MADISON AVENUE WEST X X $311,700.00
GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427
KUNIAR x X
877 SW 3RD Srar_cr x X $294,000.00
NEW 13106111 ON MN 55112
GII.BERI Nil:(*] IANICAI. X X
4 -151 W 76th S«eu x X $329,945.00
t`linncapulis R1N 55435 i
IIIFLI -N I It AT1NG A111) ROOFING. INC. x X
1717 13 "1It STIZFF I' SF x X $329,800.00
BRAINHRD MN 56401
GORIIANI OWN MECI IANICAI., INC. X X
841 FOREST AVENUE EAST x X $293,400.00
MORA, MN 55051
E &V Consultants and Construction Managers
Owner: CITY 01+ BROOKLYN CENTER
Project: EARLE BROWN HERITAGE' CENTER - ADDITIONS / RENOVATIONS
E&V Project No.: 9913
BID PACKAGE NO. 2 - n1I) TABULATION
BID DATE.: November 18, 1998
I
BID DIVISION NO.3152 -E.B: EIRE PROTECTION
5% Addendum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
Bid 1 3 Base Bid Combined Bid Alternate #2 Alternate #4
CONTRACTOR Bond 2 ( Deduct COMMENTS
ARROW SPIZINKLlilt X X
1521 93 LANG NI, x X $26,550.00
13LAINE MN 55449
IWOTnERS FIRE PRO HVIION X X
2400 PRIOR AVENUE NOR 111, SUITE loo x X $42,800.00
ROSEVILLF., MN 55113
DIRE -GUARD SPRINKLER X X
2055 WHITE BEAR AVENUE, SUITE(' x x $24,640.00
SC. 1 1 1W I. N I N 55109
INDI'.PENIAXI DIRE PRO I F(' RON x x
76121IWY 65 NE X x $32,980.00
I RI)I.I:Y NIN 55432
VIh1N6 Ali 101MA "Ill' SPRINKLER x x
2400 Ruse Place x X $33,800.00
St, Paul MN 55113 `
E &V Consultants and Construction Managers
Owner: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Project: EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER - ADDITIONS / RENOVATIONS
ESV Project No.: 9913
RID PACKACE NO. 2 - IIIt) TABULATION
IIID DA'rE: November 1N, 1998
BII) DIVISION NO.31 S3 -I(13: "TI:MPERA7`URE CON'1'ROI,
6% Addendum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
Bid 1 3 Base Bid Combined Bid Alternate #2 Alternate #4
CONTRACTOR Bond 2 ' Deduct _ COMMENTS
DIRECT DIGITAL CONTROLS X X
7241 COUNTY ROAD 116 x x $188,702.00
COCKERON, 61N 55340
1)11) DIVISION NO. 3161 -EB: ELECTRICAL
6% Adderdum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
Bid 1 3 Base Bid Combined Bid Alternate #2 Alternate #4
CONTRACTOR Bond 2 Deduct COMMENTS
BLOOMING ION FLECIRIC x x
9721 I luutboldt Avenue South X X $167,900.00
Bloomington MN 55431
clil'uA1rr ELIV I RIC X X
3550 LaBorc Road x X $151,520.00
St. Paul MN 55110
UEIGI H'S ELECTRIC INC. X X
704 40th Avenue NE., x X $186,900.00
Minneapolis MN 55421
KILMER E1.E.C'TRIC CO. X X
9702 851h Avenue Nonh x X $173,200.00
Maple Grove MN 55369
i • •
E &V Consultants and Construction Managers
Owner: CITY OR BROOKLYN CENTER
Project: EARLE BROWN IIEWTACE CENTER - ADDITIONS / RENOVATIONS
E &V Project No.: 9913
1 3 1 1 ) PACKAGE. NO. 2 - III D TABULATION
1311) DATE: November I8, 1998
1311) DIVISION NO. 3161-1 ELECTRICAL
6% Addendum Alternate #1 Alternate #3
Bid CONTRACTOR Bond 2 I 3 Base Bid Co Bid Alternate #2 Alternate #4 Deduct
COMMENTS
M1SIItOISI,Ii( °rltic X X
2825 North Second Sueel X X $155.860.00
Miuncapolis MN 55411
PI IASOR ELECT RIC' X x i
138091111111strial Palk Blvd, X X $151,800.00
Plymouth MN 55441
RIDGLDALE lil "I CTRIC I x X I i
500 13rimhall .Avenue Boa 450 X X $153,000.00
Long Lake NIN 55356 I
MFNDO "PA ELECTRIC' I X I X
1345 S1131,EY NIEM IIWY. X I K $559,580.00 I
Mendota MN 55150
WEBER ELECTRIC X h
577 SHOREVOSW PARK. ROAD x I X $131,900.00
SIIOREVIEw, MN 55126
WRlclrrEl FRIC X X
2077 East Center Circle x X $149,300.00
Plymouth MN 55441
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BID DIVISION
3031 -EB: BUILDING AND SITE CONCRETE
WHEREAS, the following bids were received and opened on November 18, 1998, for
Bid Division 3031 -EB: Building and Site Concrete:
Bidder Bid Amount
Duncan Concrete Inc. $48,600.00
WHEREAS, it appears that Duncan Concrete Inc., of Browerville, Minnesota is the
lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
a contract with Duncan Concrete Inc., of Browerville, Minnesota in the name
of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Bid Division 3031 -EB: Building and Site
Concrete according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the
City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract
has been signed.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BID DIVISION
3061 -EB: CARPENTRY AND DEMOLITION
WHEREAS, the following bids were received and opened on November 18, 1998, for
Bid Division 3061 - EB: Carpentry and Demolition:
Bidder Bid Amount
GEH Construction, Inc. $396,000.00
WHEREAS, it appears that GEH Construction, Inc., of Watertown, Minnesota is the
lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
a contract with GEH Construction, Inc., of Watertown, Minnesota in the
name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Bid Division 3061 - EB: Carpentry
and Demolition according to the plans and specifications therefor approved
by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract
has been signed.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
Is its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BID DIVISION
3071 -EB: EPDM AND METAL ROOFING
WHEREAS, the following bids were received and opened on November 18, 1998, for
Bid Division 3071 -EB: EPDM and Metal Roofing:
Bidde r Bid Amount
Top -All Roofing, Inc. $59,510.00
WHEREAS, it appears that Top -All Roofing, Inc., of St. Paul, Minnesota is the lowest
responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
a contract with Top -All Roofing, Inc., of St. Paul, Minnesota in the name of
the City of Brooklyn Center, for Bid Division 3071 -EB: EPDM and Metal
Roofing according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the
City ouncil and on file i h
y n the office of e City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract
has been signed.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BID DIVISION
3081 -EB: ALUMINUM, GLASS AND GLAZING
WHEREAS, the following bids were received and opened on November 18, 1998, for
Bid Division 3081 -EB: Aluminum, Glass and Glazing:
Bidder Bid Amount
Empirehouse, Inc. $112,042.00
WHEREAS, it appears that Empirehouse, Inc., of Minneapolis, Minnesota is the
lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
a contract with Empirehouse, Inc., of Minneapolis, Minnesota in the name of
the City of Brooklyn Center, for Bid Division 3081 -EB: Aluminum, Glass and
Glazing according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the
City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract
has been signed.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
• Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION
NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BID DIVISION
3082 -EB: HOLLOW METAL, WOOD DOOR AND HARDWARE - SUPPLY
WHEREAS, the following bids were received and opened on November 18, 1998, for
Bid Division 3082 -EB: Hollow Metal, Wood Door and Hardware - Supply:
B idder Bid Amount
K & K Sales, Inc. $29,146.00
WHEREAS, it appears that K & K Sales, Inc., of Brooklyn Park, Minnesota is the
lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
a contract with K & K Sales, Inc., of Brooklyn Park, Minnesota in the name
of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Bid Division 3082 -EB: Hollow Metal,
Wood Door and Hardware - Supply according to the plans and specifications
therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City
Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract
has been signed.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following b resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BID DIVISION
3091B -EB: HARD TILE
WHEREAS, the following bids were received and opened on November 18, 1998, for
Bid Division 3091B -EB: Hard Tile:
Bidder Bid Amount
Grazzini Brothers and Co. $18,370.00
WHEREAS, it appears that Grazzini Brothers and Co., of Eagan, Minnesota is the
lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
a contract with Grazzini Brothers and Co., of Eagan, Minnesota in the name
of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Bid Division 3091B -EB: Hard Tile
according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City
Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract
has been signed.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
• and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BID DIVISION
3092 -EB: ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS
WHEREAS, the following bids were received and opened on November 18, 1998, for
Bid Division 3092 -EB: Acoustical Ceilings:
Bidder Bid Amount
Twin City Acoustics $3,965.00
WHEREAS, it appears that Twin City Acoustics, of New Hope, Minnesota is the
lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
a contract with Twin City Acoustics, of New Hope, Minnesota in the name
of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Bid Division 3092 -EB: Acoustical Ceilings
according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City
Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract
has been signed.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
® and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
• Member introduced the followin g resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BID DIVISION
3093 -EB: PAINTING
WHEREAS, the following bids were received and opened on November 18, 1998, for
Bid Division 3093 -EB: Painting:
Bidder Bid Amount
Wasche Commercial Finishes, Inc. $36,688.00
WHEREAS, it appears that Wasche Commercial Finishes, Inc., of Ham Lake,
Minnesota is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
• 1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
a contract with Wasche Commercial Finishes, Inc., of Ham Lake, Minnesota
in the name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Bid Division 3093 -EB:
Painting according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the
City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract
has been signed.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
• and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
• Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BID DIVISION
3101 -EB: OPERABLE FOLDING PARTITIONS
WHEREAS the following bids ds w ere received and opened on November 18, 1998, for
Bid Division 3101 -EB: Operable Folding Partition:
P b �.
Bidder Bid Amount
Mahin -Walz, Inc. $31,458.00
WHEREAS, it appears that Mahin -Walz, of New Hope, Minnesota is the lowest
responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
• 1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
a contract with Mahin -Walz, Inc., of New Hope, Minnesota in the name of
the City of Brooklyn Center, for Bid Division 3101 -EB: Operable Folding
Partitions according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the
City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract
has been signed.
Date
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
• and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
• Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BID DIVISION
3151 -EB: PLUMBING AND HVAC
WHEREAS, the following bids were received and opened on November 18, 1998, for
Bid Division 3151 -EB: Plumbing and HVAC:
Bidder Bid Amount
Newman Mechanical, Inc. $291,000.00
WHEREAS, it appears that Newman Mechanical, Inc., of Maplewood, Minnesota is
the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
a contract with Newman Mechanical, Inc., of Maplewood, Minnesota in the
name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Bid Division 3151 -EB: Plumbing
and HVAC according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the
City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract
has been si
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BID DIVISION
3152 -EB: FIRE PROTECTION
WHEREAS, the following bids were received and opened on November 18, 1998, for
Bid Division 3152 -EB: Fire Protection:
Bidder Bid Amount
Fire -Guard Sprinkler $24,640.00
WHEREAS, it appears that Fire -Guard Sprinkler, of St. Paul, Minnesota is the lowest
responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
a contract with Fire -Guard Sprinkler, of St. Paul, Minnesota in the name of
the City of Brooklyn Center, for Bid Division 3152 -EB: Fire Protection
according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City
Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract
has been signed.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
• Member
introduced the following resolution on and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BID DIVISION
3161 -EB: ELECTRICAL
WHEREAS, the following bids were received and opened on November 18, 1998, for
Bid Division 3161 -EB: Electrical:
Bidder Bid Amount
Weber Electric, Inc. $131,900.00
WHEREAS, it appears that Weber Electric, Inc., of Shoreview, Minnesota is the
lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
• a contract with Weber Electric, Inc., of Shoreview, Minnesota in the name of
the City of Brooklyn Center, for Bid Division 3161 EB: Electrical according
to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on
file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract
has been signed.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
City Council Agenda Item No. 9n
•
City of Brooklyn Center
A great place to start. A great place to stay.
• MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk 't�4"_Yv�
DATE: December 10, 1998
SUBJECT: Mayoral Appointment to Housing Commission
PP g
Housing Commission tone vacancy)
The Housing Commission is composed of a chairperson and eight members. One vacancy exists
with a term expiration of December 31, 1999.
Attached for City Council Members only are the applications received as follows:
Mary Hurkman 5113 Howe Lane
Muhammed Okoya -Lawal 6910 Humboldt Avenue North, 9311
Troy Rorman 6407 Emerson Avenue North
NOTE: John Whitehead also submitted an application; however, Mayor Kragness talked with John
Whitehead regarding his application, and he is withdrawing his application for the Housing
• Commission and will put in his application for the Planning Commission vacancy (Ed Nelson).
Notice of vacancy on the Housing Commission was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun -Post on
October 28, 1998. Notice was posted at City Hall and Community Center and aired on Cable
Channel 37 from October 13 through November 13, 1998.
A letter was sent to those persons who previously had submitted an application for appointment to
a Brooklyn Center advisory commission notifying them of the vacancy. Notice was also sent to
current advisory commission members.
Attached is a memorandum from Mayor Kragness indicating her nomination.
Letters were sent to each applicant notifying them that their application for appointment would be
considered at the December 14, 1998, Council meeting.
Attached is a table which indicates the geographical distribution by neighborhood of the applicants
and current members of the commission. Also attached are the procedures for filling commission
vacancies adopted by the City Council on March 27, 1995.
Recommended Council Action:
Motion by Council to ratify the Housing Commission nomination by Mayor Kragness with
term expiring December 31, 1999.
Attachments
6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 • City Hall & TDD Number (612) 569 -3300
Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number (612) 569 -3400 • FAX (612) 569 -3494
An Affirmative Action l Equal Opportunities Employer
3 City of Brooklyn Center
A great place to start. A great place to stay.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Councilmember Kathleen Carmody
Councilmember Debra Hilstrom
Councilmember Kay Lasman
Councilmember Robert Peppe
FROM: Myrna Kragness, Mayor
DATE: December 9, 1998
SUBJECT: Housing Commission Nomination
As outlined in our policy for filling commission vacancies, I would request ratification from Council
Members for the nomination of Mary Hurkman, 5113 Howe Lane, to the Housing Commission with
term expiring December 31, 1999.
•
6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 • City Hall & TDD Number (612) 569 -3300
Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number (612) 569 -3400 • FAX (612) 569 -3494
An Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunities Employer
City of Brooklyn Center
Housing Commission
Geographical Distribution
(Chairperson and Eight Members)
Applicants and Current Members
December 10, 1998
Neighborhoods Applicants Current Members
Southeast Donald Arm
2340 Brookview Drive
No .
rtheast l�Iuhammed Okoya iwa Lloyd Deuel
f 910 Huzxboldt Avenu 1606 72nd Avenue North
Trn Ra rn ....:::<::.
+GQ'�rnest�nvencue Narthil .
Northwest Ernie Erickson
6800 Drew Avenue North
West Central Mary Huu James Lano
�1I3 $Qe Labe 6424 Indiana Avenue North
>:: >>.<::, Robert Torres
4501 Winchester Lane
Michael VonDelinde
5312 Boulder Lane
Central Mark Yelich
6018 Beard Avenue North
Southwest Christopher Russell
5312 Lilac Drive North
City of Brooklyn Center
Procedures for Filling Commission /Task Force Vacancies
Adopted by Council 3/27/95
The following process for filling commission/task force vacancies was approved by the City Council
at its March 27, 1995, meeting:
Vacancies in the Commission shall be filled by Mayoral appointment with majority consent
of the City Council. The procedure for filling Commission vacancies is as follows:
1. Notices of vacancies shall be posted for 30 days before any official City
Council action is taken;
2. Vacancies shall be announced in the City's official newspaper;
3. Notices of vacancies shall be sent to all members of standing advisory
commissions;
4. Applications for Commission membership must be obtained in the City
Clerk's office and must be submitted in writing to the City Clerk;
5. The City lerk shall forward copies of the applications to the Mayor and City
Y P Pp Y
Council;
6. The Mayor shall identify and include the nominee's application form in the
City Council agenda materials for the City Council meeting at which the
nominee is presented;
7. The City Council, by majority vote, may approve an appointment at the City
Council meeting at which the nominee is presented.
PROCEDUR.CC
City Council Agenda Item No. 90
•
•
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS, AND AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR POLICE
STATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO 1998 -09, CONSTRUCTION OF NEW WEST
FIRE STATION 1998 -10 AND EAST FIRE STATION REMODELING NO. 1998 - 11
WHEREAS, the City Council established Improvement Projects for construction of
a Police Station 1998 -10, Demolition and Construction of new West Fire Station, and 1998 -11 East
Fire Station Remodeling by Resolution 97 -205,
WHEREAS, the City Council hired the Bossardt Company to perform construction
management duties on these three projects and Bossardt Company has submitted recommendations
for approval of certain items from bid package #2, a portion of the bids for both West Fire and East
Fire Station projects, and from the Police Station bid package,
WHEREAS, the following bids were received and opened on September 2, 1998, and
September 16, 1998 for bid packages # 1 and #2 on Improvement Project No 1998 -10 and 1998 -11,
and on August 4, 1998 for the Police Station, and these bids have been reviewed by Bossardt
• Company in its capacity as Construction Manager on the project, and have been recommended for
approval by the City Council,
West Fire Station:
1.23 Painting & Wall Coverings -
Wasche Commercial Finishes $44,980
1.2413 Flagpole (purchase quote supply only) -
JH Nicklas Co. $ 3,689
East Fire Station:
1.13 Painting & Wall Coverings
Wasche Commercial Finishes $27,398
1.14B Flagpole (purchase quote supply only) -
JH Nicklas Co. $ 3,689
•
Police Station:
1.31 Controls -
UHL Co. $77,300
WHEREAS, Bossardt Company has advised the City Council that the above contractors are the
lowest responsible bidders,
The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to direct Bossardt Company to proceed with
development of the contract and the administration of the contracts for the above bids in accordance
with Bossardt duties as Construction Manager on 1998 -09, 1998 -10 and 1998 -11 Improvement
projects.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
A RDT vUR? RA T 1 , ON
BOSSARDT CORPORATION
Prof essional Construction Managers
Phonc: (612) 831 -5408
Fax: (612) 831-1268
FAX TRANSMITTAL /
DATE: ��f� REGARUNG: fi G �1�
COMPANY:
A'TT'ENTION: ��.1//YrtiG���r =� FAX NUMBER:
FROM:
NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET):
ORIGINAL TO FOLLOW BY MAIL: YES: NO:
COPIES DATE NO. SHTS. 9 DESCRIPTION
MESSAGE:
If you do not receive a full and /or clear copy of this fax, pleas.- call ai (6i2)S31 -540F
or reply by fax at (612) 831 -126 %. Thank You.
%4!rrr Mclr4 fi,,,Jarnrd - Swrc ua011 - Afi— 'Opohs. f.055419-.'324 (601 •1'i /-SVns
CNIAA
- tU "6il V; :J �� 0�`J.ttill! vl. A".i A;, ;'N i;,� �v J'i
BOSSARUT CORPORATION
Pmfessiunul ConsIrucfion Munugeri
December 7, 1998
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
ATTENTION: Michael McCaulev
RE: BROOKLYN CENTER EAST & WEST FIRE STATIONS, & POLICE STATION
RECOMMENDATION FOR CONTRACT AWARDS
Dear Mr. McCauley:
Based on bid results and apparent low bidders, we are making the following recommendations
for award. Listed below are bid results for the East & West Fire Stations, bid package #2, and
Police Station bids of which we are seeking approval at the December 14, 1998, City Council
Meeting.
The award of contracts from the East & West Fire & Police Station bid openings are as follows:
EAST FIRE STATION:
1.13 Painting & Wail Coverings -
Wasche Commercial Finishes $27,398.00
1.14B Flagpole (purchase quote supply only) -
JH Nicklas Co. $3,689.00
WEST FIRE STATION:
1.23 Painting & Wall Coverings -
Wasche Commercial Finishes $44,980.00
7400 Metro Boafeounl • Suire 400 • pfinnrupolir. MN S54. t9 -_326 • (612) 831 -5408 • (800) 290.0119 -Far (612) 831 -7268
%�irii�.ci
- .� JJ OvJJnAL �V, {YUtt.1liJiti i "„ 'SJ'
City of Brooklyn Center "lw 5 ,
December 7, 1998 r J ,1
Page 2 �q
1.248 Flagpole (purchase quote supply only) -
JH Nicklas Co. $3,689.00
POLICE STATION:
1.31 Controls -
UHL Co. $77,300.00
Approval of the above referenced contracts will allow this project to proceed on schedule.
Yours very truly,
Dave Hanson
Senior Project Manager
DH:dt
cc: Jane Chambers
Al Mjorud
Paul Mickelberg
•
December 10, 1998
MEMO
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM' �aneA. Chambers, Assistant City Manager/HR Director
SUBJECT -" Award of Bids, Police Station, and East and West Fire Station Projects
At its meeting of December 14, 1998, the Council will be requested to award various bids on the
above projects as part of the continuing award process for portions of the construction work as
directed by the construction manager, Bossardt Corporation.
Each of the bids outlined in the resolution for award have been documented in the Contractor Bid
Analysis book produced by Bossardt that was made available to the Council at the last award
request. A copy of the sheets pertaining to the various bids in the resolution are attached to this
memo for the Council's information.
PROJECT:BROOKLYN CENTER FIRE STATION - WEST BID ANALYSIS SHEET
BP #2 PREPARED BY: BOSSARDT CORPORATION
BID CATEGORY: PAINTINGIWALL COVERING BID DATE: 912/98
�I I 1 1 2 3 4 '
Wasche I
( I I 1
BIDDER NAME Comm.Finishes !
(BASE BID $ 44,980 !
I � I
ALTERNATES
I I i I
iLABOR & MATERIAL YES ( YES I YES ' YES i YES
(LABOR ONLY
(MATERIAL ONLY
TAX I INCLUDED + INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED I INCLUDED
®iBID SECURITY INCLUDED i INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED
ITOTAL $ 44,980 IS -I$ - $ _I$ _I
I
I I I I i
(ADDENDUM # 1 INCLUDED I INCLUDED I INCLUDED I INCLUDED I INCLUDED I
(ADDENDUM # 2 INCLUDED I INCLUDED I INCLUDED ( INCLUDED I INCLUDED
(ADDENDUM # 3 i INCLUDED i INCLUDED I INCLUDED I INCLUDED i INCLUDED
i I
I I
IGENERAL
INCLUSIONS
1
I
I
IGENERAL
I EXCLUSIONS
I
i I
NOTES
I
I
g:\ template \4bidawrd\3bidanal \bidanaly.xls
BP #2 PREPARED BY: BOSSARDT CORPORATION
BID CATEGORY: MISCELLANEOUS SPECIALTIES BID DATE: 9116/98
1 2 3 4 r 5
BIDDER NAME ( J.H. Nickolas Specialty Sales I Bartley Sales Construction Supply I
I
• BASE BID $ 3,689 $ 11,180 $ 16,824 $ 30,490
I Flag Pole only y
ALTERNATES
LABOR & MATERIAL
LABOR ONLY
MATERIAL ONLY YES YES YES I YES YES
TAX INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED
BID SECURITY INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED
TOTAL I $ 3,689 $ 11,180 $ 16,824 I $ 30,490 $
f
ADDENDUM # 1 INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED
ADDENDUM # 2 I INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED
ADDENDUM # 3 I INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED I INCLUDED INCLUDED j
1
1 1
GENERAL
INCLUS
GENERAL
EXCLUSIONS
NOTES
g:\ template \4bidawrd \3bidanal \bidanaly. xls
BID CAT P AINTINGIWALL COV ERING _BID DATE: 9/16/98
1 I 2 I 3. I _4 _. I 5 j
(BIDDER NAME -- - - - wasche I I I
Comm.Finishes l I
BASE BID $ 27,398 I I I I
I
I I ( (
ALTERNATES
I I ( I
LABOR & MATERIAL I YES ( YES I YES I YES YES
(LABOR ONLY I I I I I
I I I I I I I
MATERIAL ONLY
I I I I I I
ITAX I INCLUDED I INCLUDED j INCLUDED I INCLUDED I INCLUDED
i
(BID SECURITY I INCLUDED I INCLUDED j INCLUDED ( INCLUDED I INCLUDED I
I I j I I
TOTAL I$ 27,3981$ -I$ _I$ _I$ _
I I
ADDENDUM # 1 I INCLUDED ( INCLUDED I INCLUDED 1 INCLUDED I INCLUDED
IADDENDUM # 2
I INCLUDED 1 INCLUDED 1 INCLUDED I INCLUDED ( INCLUDED I
IADDENDUM# 3 ( INCLUDED 1 INCLUDED j INCLUDED j INCLUDED j INCLUDED
I I I I I
I I I i I I I
I I I i
IGENERAL
INCLUSIONS I
I
I I
GENERAL I
EXCLUSIONS ( I
l
NOTES I
I I
I
I
!• g:\ template \4bidawrd \3bidanal \bidanalv.xis
PROJECT: BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE STATION BID ANALYSIS SHEET
PREPARED BY: BOSSARDT CORPORATION
BID CATEGORY: 1.31 TEMP CONTROLS BID DATE: 814198
1 2 3 4 5 z
>
I I NORTHERN AIR EDS INC. I EGAN CONTROL SERVICE
R NAME UHL COMPANY I AUTOMATION OF MINNESOTA
g
CORP. _
BASE BID I $ 77,300 $ 81,400 $ 82,300 $ 84,950 �! $ 101,700
1 l YES i YES
LABOR & MATERIAL I YES YES YES I
I
LABOR ONLY
MATERIAL ONLY i
I INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED {
TAX
(81D SECURITY
I YES YES YES YES YES
1
i 82,300 $ 84,950 $ 101,700
TOTAL $ 77,300 $ 81,400 $ ,
ADDENDUM #1 INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED
JALTERNATES
#1 BUILT -UP ROOF N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A 1
1 #2 ADDL. FINISHES NIA N/A NIA N/A j
#3 INFRARED SYST. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3A. N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A `
3B. N/A N/A N/A N/A
3C. $ 450 0 $ 800 $ 1,200 $ 900
#4 FIRE PROTECTION N/A N/A N/A N/(1 N/A
#5 DELETE HUMIDIF. $ 3,200 0 $ (900) $ (1,120) $ (500)
1#6 REVISE FAUCETS NIA NIA NIA N/A N/A
#7 FINISH HDWARE N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA
(UNIT PRICES UP -1 NIA N/A N/A N/A NIA
UP -2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
UP -3 NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A
UP-4 N/A NIA N/A NIA NIA
UP -5 N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A
0-6 N/A N/A NIA NIA N/A
GENERAL
INCLUSIONS
GENERAL
1EXCLUS
SEE BID
NOTES
1
g:\ Temp( are\4bidawra\.ibtaanal \bidanaly.xls
•
city ouncil Agenda It m
e No.9
tY p
•
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION SETTING SALARIES AND BENEFITS FOR THE CALENDAR
YEAR 1999
WHEREAS, Section 2.07 of the City Charter for the City of Brooklyn Center
states that the City Council is to fix the salary and benefits of all officers and employees of the
City; and
WHEREAS, the 1984 Minnesota Pay Equity Act requires every political
subdivision to establish "equitable compensation relationships" between its employees; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the 1999 Full -time Employee Pay
Plan; and
WHEREAS, an individual employee's movement through their respective pay
schedule reflects a progression in corresponding levels or improved job performance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center hereby sets wages, salaries and benefits for the calendar year 1999 by adoption
• of the attached Plan and also allows the City Manager to set appropriate increases to the part-
time schedule to be consistent with other employee groups, which the City Manager shall be
authorized to pay.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager may reclassify, adjust, add
and /or delete position(s) to pay grades in the Plans but is limited to authorizing increases due
to Pay Equity Act compliance and by the Annual Budget constraints adopted by the City
Council; and
BE IT FURTHER :RESOLVED that the 1999 Full-time Pay Plan is approved and
adopted because it is in general an equitable pay plan for City employees; however, parts of the
Plan are approved and adopted solely for the purpose of compliance with the mandate of
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 471.999; that adoption of said Plan shall create no vested rights,
terms or conditions of employment or entitlement to any given level of compensation for any
employee or group of employees; that said Plan shall be subject to continuing review and
reconsideration and may be amended from time -to -time by the City Council; and
RESOLUTION NO.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City anager be authorized to employ
Y b P Y
full and part-time and/or temporary employees as may be necessary, and to establish competitive
rates of pay for such help consistent with the 1999 budget appropriations and to make interim
appointments to fill vacant positions whenever a position is vacant because the regular employee
is on leave of absence, vacation leave, sick leave, or is absent for any other reason, and to
establish rates of pay for such appointments consistent with the 1999 bud appropriations; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that authorized wage adjustments, not to exceed
the maximums contained herein, shall become effective January 1, 1999.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
City of Brooklyn Center
1999 Pay Plan
Full -Time Employees
City of Brooklyn Center
1999 Employee Pay Plan
Table of Contents
Contents Paize
Positions 1
City Manager & Department Head Pay Plan 4
Confidential Supervisory Employee Pay Plan 5
Non - Organized Exempt Pay Plan 6
Non - Organized Exempt Hourly Pay Plan 7
Non - Organized Non - Exempt Pay Plan 8
Teamsters #320 Pay Plan 9
Teamsters #320 Hourly Pay Plan 10
LELS Local #82 (Police) Pay Plan 11
Local #49 (Maintenance) Pay Plan 12
Insurance Contribution Schedules 13
1999 City of Brooklyn Center Regular Full-time Positions
.�v� i'•x >.:YLi. \`..ii2�.z i2i�z >. }ii`.`.ti,zii t:zi ii ?Y�,�.2 ?.viiziii2ii ii.,: C` " �.....'. iiii. -` x2xx,h'iv77x, ,kgg
{v�titi',z�tz
i ziziv�" vi�i�v' vntiiii$\• 32��z�i��i : \i�iiii$�i��i ��z��� : �} - � � v � a w a p iw �
x .'.�i ,x,,,xu,. •. x x i,��„'vai�v�'i'�., .xx,xxxx �v,x,• ^ti<!1..:.,...;.x.v �� {` } z }�vi >.zi vi:'::
'i >zzzz'.'zzzzz'zzz'z'zzzzz ". zzz' z�ZZ. z,,: z .,•.,,,.,,,,:>,,x.,w.'zz'z;izz: x�z. ,,z,,,,x,xx,,::.:,:,•:.::::.,:. x •<:'. • z�.:: > .z "�z,..�,,,:x,,,x,.x .
.tt
:zz ,•
i,,,,•.,,,z,z „•.,,z, ,a, .,,,,zz,'3.,,z�`�,.,,,,t .....,•.,,,. ',,,•.,,,z xx.,, ,, :,:..:.:. :..,x,..,...• .,:x:,,.•.,�x<, ti�4''�, .,i, .,zk�., z
::..z .x„ •..,,,, � a.•:. ♦ . .:,,x,x.x,.x.x ..,xxx..��, x..xx„ .:..,... :.. ......::::.: >zz�azzz:
xz:x'zaw,,,:�, xzzzt.�.,, `kxz' \, zzw�z' zzzz.:: 'zz:<:t•z,zz ui�i '�ci��� •�: •' ;��z
:..< 2 ,.,,3 ,,,,,:Q�. ', � �i: �,• u: �, �: �k�k` u,,, ,.xt22:;`,;,,,,,,;,,,,:N.,,,t`; `.. ,�ii•Y��.frf#.,. •}��:,� i2;• •1F�i RFRS� J.... ``. #.;
CITY... _ .., » >...> .... .. ..
MANAGER'S OFFICE
City Manager 1 Contract Yes -Exec
Assistant City Manager /HR Director 1 No Yes -Adm
City Clerk 1 No Yes -Adm
Human Resources Assistant 1 No Yes -Adm
MIS/Technology Coordinator 1 No Yes -Adm
Administrative Specialist 1 No No
Administrative Technician /Deputy City Clerk 1 No No
Administration /Comm. Dev. Secretary 1 No No
Customer Service Rep /Permit Technician 2 No No
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Director of Community Development 1 T -320 Yes -Exec
Planning and Zoning Specialist 1 No Yes -Prof
Community Development Specialist 1 No Yes -Adm
Building Official 1 No Yes -Adm
Building Inspector 1 No No
Housing Inspector 1 No No
Community Development Secretary 1 No No
Assessing Division
Assessor 1 T -320 Yes -Exec
Appraiser II 1 No No
Appraiser Technician 1 No No
Assessing Secretary 1 No No
Earle Brown Heritage Center
EBHC Manager 1 T -320 Yes -Exec
EBHC Maintenance Supervisor 1 No Yes -Exec
EBHC Crew Chief 2 No No
EBHC Sales Director 1 No Yes -Exec
EBHC Salesperson 3 No Yes -Adm
EBHC Innkeeper 1 No Yes -Exec
EBHC Maintenance Custodian 1 No No
EBHC Secretary & Billing Clerk 2 No No
EBHC Assistant Innkeeper 1 No No
FINANCE
Director of Finance 1 T -320 Yes -Exec
Assistant Director of Finance 1 T -320 Yes -Adm
Staff Accountant 1 No Yes -Prof
Payroll /Personnel Technician 1 No No
Utilities Technician II 1 No No
Accounting Technician II 1 No No
Utilities Technician I 1 No No
1
...........
Liquor Stores Division
Liquor Operation's Manager 1 T-320 Yes-Exec
Liquor Store Manager 2 No Yes-Exec
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Chief/Emergency Management Coord. I T-320 Yes-Exec
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Chief of Police 1 T-320 Yes-Exec
Police Captain 2 T-320 Yes-Adm
Administrative Sergeant 1 L #82 No
Community Services Sergeant 1 L #82 No
Police Sergeant 5 L #82 No
Police Officer 34 L #82 No
Administrative Aide 1 No No
Administrative Manager 1 T-320 Yes-Adm
Community Service Officer 2 No No
Property Room Supervisor I No No
Public Safety Dispatcher 6 No No
Police Secretary/Receptionist 3 No No
Police Classification Technician I No No
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Director of Public Works 1 T-320 Yes-Exec
City Engineer 1 T-320 Yes-Prof
Public Works Specialist 1 No Yes-Adm
Engineering Technician IV 1 No No
Engineering Technician 111 3 No No
Engineering Technician 11 1 No No
Public Works Administrative Aide I No No
Engineering Secretary 1 No No
Streets and Parks Division
Public Works Superintendent 1 T-320 Yes-Exec
Supervisor of Streets and Parks Maintenance I No No
Crew Leader 3 L #49 No
Maintenance 11 15 L #49 No
Central Garage Division
Mechanic 3 L #49 No
Night Service Person 1 L #49 No
Central Garage Technician 1 No No
Public Works Administrative Technician 1 No No
Public Utilities Division
Supervisor of Public Utilities 1 No No
Crew Leader 1 L #49 No
Maintenance 11 5 L #49 No
::.;• :.::..:.- ,• -••::: ii•::::,•:::•::•:,i•: ,:.::.. .a,•:.,., . � .... -. , .... .:- :: >:•: .•: , •:::.:. ckkk�: �: :::zxikkkk:z::zk�kkkkxkkkk:kkz : >� ; �:.:: :::..i....:.;,:.,:i:i:.:i:.:..: ••.,
;.� v;R < „Yiu., k,,.;-, y,,,,,,,,;,,,, i ,it.,:,.i:,,,,,,, :iiiiikii;Y, 4k tii ;,: \ <ikikkkii „i;;k`tii;:i•`.k; tiia:; ,,,t,,, ,k,. w,ww,,,,,, ; .,,,,.,,,,,,•
•kkkkk 4fFft
zzizz;;zzzzkk::, ww
: t
;: i;:. vi:} k2k 't:,•`M1j�iil1kkYivi >.$`- .:.:i. ..,
i :i•.vh • ,vrii•.v.,,,,w,
.i�y�{ �
COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES, RECREATION &
SERVICES
Director of Community Activities, Rec. & Serv. 1 T -320 Yes -Exec
Program Supervisor 3 No Yes -Adm
Aquatics Supervisor 1 No Yes -Adm
Golf Course Grounds Supervisor 1 No Yes -Adm
Recreation Secretary 1 No No
Customer Service Representative /Secretary 1 No No
Government Buildings Division
Maintenance Supervisor 1 No Yes -Exec
Maintenance Custodian 2 No No
Custodian 5 No No
Police Custodian 1 No No
` ......:. ..•.h4 W...h... h. .k.`:. �.:. \ti �:.h 7.`. h•.. ......:. •. ..:h \.1....... J:h..h.: tl�h..h�.. hU 1. hk
3
1999 City Manager and Department Head pay plan
Exempt from overtime (not eligible for overtime)
(Position titleMinimum Maximum ')
(City Manager I $ 74,263 $ 92,298
Assistant City Manager /HR Director $ 54,234 $ 65,996
I Departmerit Reads Minimum Maximum 'I
(Director of Public Works S 67,918 $ 83,878
iDirector of Finance /Treasurer S 63,151 $ 77,992
(Chief of Police (S 61,513 I $ 75,968
(Director of Community Development I $ 57,682 I $ 71,236
( Community Activities, Recreation, I $ 56,980 I $ 70,370
& Services Director
Fire Chief $ 53,616 $ 66,216
I
Department Heads are under contract with Teamsters 320 for 1998 - 99.
Salary setting authority: The City Manager is authorized to set salaries
within the established ranges.
12;8/98: 1999 City Manager Department Heads
1999 Confidential Supervisory Employees Pay
O F-xempt from overtime (not eligible for overtime)
Pay Step step Step
Step,: Step Step' Step
Grai#e Pasition't►tfe ..:'
CS21 City Clerk I $ 3,444 $ 3,616 ($ 3,797 $ 3,892 $ 3,989 $ 4,089 $ 4,191
Human Resources Assistant
0
Normal progression: Minimum is starting rate. After successful completion of 6 months of probationary period, i
individuals move to the next step. After 18 months of successful performance of job duties, individuals will move to
the next step. Additional advances in steps up to the maximum shall be at the discretion of the City Manager,
based upon recommendation by the Department Head. The City Manager may start employees above the
minimum step based upon experience.
City Managers Discretion: The City Manager is authorized to set salaries below the minimum rate when
performance or qualifications are less than required for the position. The City Manager is authorized to set salaries
!above the minimum starting rate when qualifications exceed those required for the starting rate.
Merit Steps: Merit steps of up to ten percent above the maximum rate shall only be awarded with express approval
!of the City Council as recommended by the City Manager.
5
1999 Non- organized Full time employee pay plan
Exempt from overtime (not eligible for overtime)
Pay Step Step Step Step Step Step Step
Grade Position title:;::::::: I A B �' C D I E F G
C31 Public Works Supt. $ 4,400 $ 4,620 $ 4,851 $ 4,972 $ 5,097 $ 5,224 $ 5,355
1
I C29 MIS Coordinator $ 4,188 $ 4,397 ( $ 4,617 $ 4,733 $ 4,851 $ 4,972 $ 5,097
C25 Building Official $ 3,794 $ 3,984 $ 4,183 $ 4,288 $ 4,395 $ 4,505 $ 4,617
Comm. Dev. Specialist
Planning & Zoning Specialist
C22 Staff Accountant $ 3,523 $ 3,699 $ 3,884 $ 3,981 $ 4,081 $ 4,183 $ 4,288
Public Works Specialist
C20 Rec. Program Supervisor $ 3,353 $ 3,521 $ 3,697 $ 3,790 $ 3,884 $ 3,981 $ 4,081
EBHC Maint. Supervisor
C18 EBHC Sales Director $ 3,192 $ 3,351 $ 3,519 $ 3,607 $ 3,697 $ 3,790 $ 3,884
EBHC Innkeeper
C16 Maintenance Supervisor $ 3,038 $ 3,190 $ 3,349 $ 3,433 $ 3,519 $ 3,607 $ 3,697
Liquor Store Manager
I C12 EBHC Salesperson i $ 2,752 $ 2,890 $ 3,034 I $ 3,110 $ 3,188 $ 3,268 ( $ 3,349
C8 Aquatics Supervisor I $ 2,493 $ 2,618 $ 2,749 $ 2,818 $ 2,888 $ 2,960 $ 3,034
Golf Course Supervisor
Normal progression: Minimum is starting rate. After successful completion of 6 months of probationary period,
individuals move to the next step. After 18 months of successful performance of job duties, individuals will move to
the next step. Additional advances in steps up to the maximum shall be at the discretion of the City Manager,
based upon recommendation by the Department Head. The City Manager may start employees above the
minimum step based upon experience.
City Managers Discretion: The City Manager is authorized to set salaries below the minimum rate when
performance or qualifications are less than required for the position. The City Manager is authorized to set salaries
above the minimum starting rate when qualifications exceed those required for the starting rate.
Merit Steps: Merit steps of up to ten percent above the maximum rate shall only be awarded with express approval;
of the City Council as recommended by the City Manager. j
12'9/98 10:44 AM ExemptMontnly 6
1999 Non - organized Full time employee pay plan
Exempt from overtime (not eligible for overtime)
Expressed as a hourly rate based upon 2,088 hours in 1999.
Pay f Step Step Step Step .I. Step Step ( Step
Grade Posi tr on. tale
A B C' D E:
C31 Public Works Supt. I 25.2871 26.552 27.879 28.576 29.291 30.023 30.774
C29 MIS /Technology Coordinator 1 24.069 25.272 26.5361 27.199 27.8791 28.5761 29.291
C25 Building Official 21.805 22.895 24.040 24.641 25.257 25.889 26.536
Comm. Dev. Specialist
Planning & Zoning Specialist
C22 Staff Accountant 20.248 21.261 22.324 22.882 23.454 24.040 24.641
Public Works Specialist
C20 Rec. Program Supervisor 19.273 20.236 21.248 21.779 22.324 22.882 23.454
EBHC Maint. Supervisor
C18 EBHC Sales Director 18.344 19.261 20.224 20.730 21.248 21.779 22.324
EBHC Innkeeper
C16 Maintenance Supervisor 17.460 18.333 19.250 19.731 20.224 20.730 21.248
Liquor Store Manager
C12 EBHC Salesperson 15.8181 16.6091 17.4391 17.875 18.3221 18.7801 19.250
® C8 Aquatics Supervisor 14.330 15.047 15.799 16.194 16.599 17.014 17.439
Golf Course Supervisor
Normal progression: Minimum is starting rate. After successful completion of 6 months of probationary period,
individuals move to the next step. After 18 months of successful performance of job duties, individuals will move to
the next step. Additional advances in steps up to the maximum shall be at the discretion of the City Manager,
based upon recommendation by the Department Head. The City Manager may start employees above the
minimum step based upon experience.
City Managers Discretion: The City Manager is authorized to set salaries below the minimum rate when
performance or qualifications are less than required for the position. The City Manager is authorized to set salaries
above the minimum starting rate when qualifications exceed those required for the starting rate.
i
Merit Steps: Merit steps of up to ten percent above the maximum rate shall only be awarded with express approval
of the City Council as recommended by the City Manager.
i
12/9/98 10:43 AM ExemptHourty 7
1999 Non - organized Full time employee pay plan
Non - exempt (eligible for overtime)
Pay Step Step Step Step Step Step Step
Grade Pasitiori title A B C D E F G
D37 Eng. Tech. IV $ 21.233 $ 22.295 $ 23.409 $ 23.995 $ 24.594 $25.20 1 9 $ 25.840
Supervisor Streets & Parks I
D35 Supervisor Public Utilities $ 20.210 $ 21.220 $ 22.281 $ 22.838 $ 23.409 $ 23.995 $ 24.594
D34 Appraiser II $19.717 $ 20.703 $ 21.738 I $ 22.281 $ 22.838 I $ 23.409 $ 23.995
D31 Inspector, Building $18.309 $19.225 $ 20.186 $ 20.690 $ 21.208 I $ 21.738 $ 22.281
D30 Inspector, Housing $17.863 $18.756 + $19.693 I $ 20.186 $ 20.690 I $ 21.208 $ 21.738
D27 Eng. Tech. III $16.587 $17.417 I $18.287 $18.745 $19.213 $19.693 $ 20.186
Central Garage Technician
D25 Appraiser Technician $15.788 $16.577 $17.406 1 $17.841 ( $18.287 i $18.745 $19.213
D24 Maintenance Custodian $15.403 $16.173 $16.982 I $17.406 J $17.841 I $18.287 $18.745
Payroll /Personnel Tech.
D21 Public Works Adm. Aide $14.303 $15.018 I $15.769 ($16.163 I $16.567 I $16.982 $17.406
D20 Adm Tech. /Deputy City Clerk $13.954 $14.652 $15.385 $15.769 $16.163 $16.567 $16.982
Public Safety Dispatcher
D17 Police Aministrative Aide $12.958 $13.606 $14.286 $14.643 $15.009 $15.385 $15.769
Accounting Technician II
Pol. Classification Technician
Utilities Technician 11
EBHC Maintenance Cust.
D14 Assessing Secretary $12.033 $12.634 $13.266 $13.598 $13.938 $14.286 $14.643
Engineering Secretary
Neighborhood Liaison
Property Room Supervisor
Public Works Admin. Tech.
Utilities Technician I
D13 Community Develop Secretary $1"1_.739'_$12.326 $12.942 $13.266 $13.598 $13.938 $14.286
Customer Service Rep/ Permit
EBHC SecJReceptionist
EBHC Sec. /Billing Clerk
Police Secretary/Receptionist
Recreation Secretary
D8 Police Receptionist $10.376 $10.895 $11.439 $11.725 $12.018 $12.319 $12.627
EBHC Assistant Innkeeper
EBHC Crew Chief
D6 Custodian $ 9.876 510.370 $10.888 $11.160 I $11.439 $11.725 $12.018
D1 Community Service Officer $ 8.729 $ 9.165 i $ 9.623 $ 9.864 I $10.111 $10.363 $10.622
12/9/98 10:56 AM Non Exempt 8
1999 Teamsters 320 - Supervisors pay plan
Exempt from overtime (not eligible for overtime)
Pay Step Step Step Step Step Step Step
Grade P& tion title.
T35 City Engineer $ 4,867 $ 5,110 $ 5,366 $ 5,500 $ 5,637 $ 5,778 $ 5,923
T33 City Assessor I $ 4,632 $ 4,863 $ 5,106 $ 5,234 $ 5,365 $ 5,499 $ 5,637
(T32 Police Captain ( $ 4,520 $ 4,746 $ 4,983 $ 5,107 $ 5,235 $ 5,366 $ 5,500
I T31 Asst. Finance Dir. ( $ 4,409 $ 4,630 $ 4,861 I $ 4,983 ( $ 5,108 $ 5,235 $ 5,366
(T29 Liquor Operations Mgr. y $ 4,197 $ 4,407 $ 4,627 $ 4,743 I $ 4,862 $ 4,983 $ 5,108
I T26 EBHC Manager ( $ 3,897 $ 4,091 $ 4,296 $ 4,403 $ 4,513 $ 4,626 ( $ 4,742
�T20 Police Admin. Manager ( $ 3,360 $ 3,528 $ 3,704 $ 3,797 $ 3,892 $ 3,989 I $ 4,089
9
12111 /98 11:00 AM
1999 Teamsters 320 - Supervisors pay plan
Exempt from overtime (not eligible for overtime)
• Expressed as an hourly rate based upon 2,088 working hours in 1999
1 PaY Step' Step Step Step Step Step Step
Grade Posifion.titie A! B G Q E> F
1 T35 (City Engineer 27.971 29.369 30.838 31.609 32.399 33.209 34.039
1 T33 City Assessor ( 26.619 27.950 29.3471 30.081 30.833 31.604 32.394
(T32 1Police Captain ( 25.9751 27.2731 28.6371 29.3531 30.087 30.839 31.610
f T31 1 Finance Dir. 1 25.3421 26.609 27.9391 28.6381 29.354 30.088 30.840
1 T29 Liquor Operations Mgr. 1 24.1211 25.327 26.5941 27.2591 27.940 28.638 29.3541
T26 EBHC Manager 1 22.3941 23.5141 24.6901 25.3071 25.940 26.588 27.2531
T20 (Police Admin. Manager 1 19.3101 20.2761 21.2901 21.8221 22.368 22.927 23.5001
10
12/11/98 11:00 AM
Page Left Blank Intentionally
No settlement for LELS No. 82
Police Officers and Sergeants
Negotiations in Process
s
11
1997 - 1999 Local 49 (Maintenance) Pay Plan
Non - exempt (eligible for overtime)
Positi on: title 1997) 1998: .....1999
Maintenance 111 1 16.671 17.17 17.69
Maintenance II 16.031 16.51 17.01
Step 3 I 14.911 15.361 15.82
Step 2 i 13.811 14.221 14.65
Step 1 1 12.701 13.081 13.47
Start 11.58 11.93 12.29
Mechanic i 16.711 17.211 17.73
Night Service Person i 15.771 16.241 16.73
I
Efiourly: ctrffere"nt,alls
(Welding ( 16.381 16.871 17.381
Crew Leader:
An Employee assigned in writing by the Dept. Head or Public Works Superintendent,
to assist a supervisor as crew leader will be paid $1.50 per hour over their base wage
of their. regular position while performing such duties.
Public Works Maintenance staff are under contract with Local 49 for 1997 - 99.
12/7/98 10:40 AM Local 49 1
1999 Employee Insurance Benefits
Non - organized Full -Time City Employees
Full-time City Employees
Effective 1/1/99, the City will contribute payment of three hundred sixty-five ($365) dollars
per month per employee for use in the Employer's Cafeteria Benefit Plan. Additional
benefits may .be purchased by the employee as made available through the Employer's
Cafeteria Benefit Plan.
International Union of Operatin Eng ineers. Local 49 (Maintenance)
Full -time City Employees
Effective 1/1/99, the City will contribute payment of three hundred sixty-five ($365) dollars
per month per employee for use in the Employer's Cafeteria Benefit Plan. Additional
benefits may be purchased by the employee as made available through the Employer's
Cafeteria Benefit Plan.
Law Enforcement Labor Services LELS 82 (Police & Sergeants)
The City is currently in negotiation for a new contract with LELS.
Teamsters #320 (Department Head /Supervisors),
Full -time City Employees
Effective 1/1/99, the City will contribute payment of an amount not to exceed $400.00 per
month per employee toward the cost of coverage under the Brooklyn Center group
hospital/medical insurance plans and group dental insurance as fringe benefit compensation
for full-time employees and eligible dependents. Dental insurance not to exceed $30 per
month. In addition, the City will provide a $10,000 group term life insurance policy.
13
City Council Agenda Item No. 9q
•
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Tom Bublitz, Community Development Specialist
DATE: December 8, 1998
SUBJECT: Report on Community Development Block Grant Home Rehabilitation Loan
Options
At the October 19, 1998, City Council Work Session, staff was directed to investigate the use of
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for "operating expenses to free up general fund
monies and whether there would be any CDBG eligible ways to approach targeted rehabilitation ".
The City ouncil also directed staff to contact Hennepin County ty P and make sure CDBG rehabilitation
funds were frozen until the issues relative to the use of the funds are resolved. Staff contacted the
Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development and confirmed that all 1998 CDBG
rehabilitation funds were committed to Brooklyn Center residents on the waiting list. No new CDBG
funds would be available until 1999. The Brooklyn Center residents now being served were on the
waiting list since 1993. No new applications to the waiting list have been added for several years and
approximately 40 people remain on the waiting list.
Staff met separately with Hennepin County staff and staff from the Greater Minneapolis Metropolitan
Housing Corporation's Northwest Housing Resource Center to discuss options for housing
rehabilitation in the City of Brooklyn Center. A summary of the meetings with both agencies follows.
Meeting with Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development Staff
• County staff noted that the County Board has issued a directive to staff to look at alternative
methods for allocating Community Development Block Grant funds to cities participating in the
Hennepin County consortium consisting of 47 Hennepin County cities including Brooklyn Center.
The County will be scheduling meetings in early 1999 to discuss possible changes in the allocation
of the CDBG funds.
• One of the options that could be discussed with the county is the possibility of taking a certain
percentage of CDBG funds out of the total County allocation prior to disbursal to the cities, for
use in funding public service programs. As in Brooklyn Center, the pressure for funding of public
service programs is increasing and many cities find themselves faced with a significant number
of requests from public service agencies for CDBG funds.
MEMORANDUM
December 8, 1998
Page 2
• Since the CDBG program was started in the mid- 1970's, the Brooklyn Center City Council has
had a firm policy of funding "bricks and mortar" projects and not public service projects.
Substituting public service funding for bricks and mortar rehabilitaition projects in exchange for
funding rehabilitation projects with general fund monies may make the CDBG allocation process
more difficult. For example, the city of St. Louis Park has apparently funded public service
projects with their CDBG funds and now finds themselves in a position of receiving a significant
number of requests for public service programs. The volume of requests is significant and in St.
Louis Park the city can take up to two nights of public hearings to hear all the requests from
public service agencies.
• Funding for public service activities with CDBG funds is limited to 15% of the total County
allocation. The Household Outside Maintenance for the Elderly (H.O.M.E.) program, funded
with CDBG funds, is technically classified as a public service activity and represents 4% of the
City's 1998 allocation. However, the program itself is restricted to minor home repairs and is not
a true service activity. If the City funds up to the 15% cap limit this would mean an additional
$27,000 could be allocated to public service activities based on the 1998 allocation.
• Staff revisited the issue of combining CDBG funds with another loan program such as the
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's Fix -up fund to provide a blended interest rate to make
loans more attractive to homeowners. The problems with this approach remain unchanged from
the information received from Hennepin County in November of 1997. Essentially, combining
the CDBG funds with MHFA funds does not eliminate the administrative requirements of the
CDBG program including income verification of the applicants income, preliminary inspections
and scope of work prepared by County or City staff, final inspections conducted by the
administering agency and a lien against the property as per CDBG program requirements. On
the other hand, MHFA funds are designed to provide a wide range of flexibility to homeowners
and they may use these funds to do value added improvements without inspection or lien
requirements from a public agency. In conclusion, there is no way to effectively merge the
programs and the two would remain separate throughout the process.
• With regard to limiting CDBG funds to items such as roofing or exterior maintenance in a
specified area, there still remains the need to meet Section 8 housing standards in CDBG projects.
In other words, exterior improvements could not stand alone without assurance that the interior
of the home meets housing quality standards as per Section 8 guidelines.
• To put the home rehabilitation efforts funded with CDBG dollars in some perspective, staff
researched the number and dollar amount of siding and roofing jobs done in Brooklyn Center in
1998. Also, it is probably safe to assume most of the re -roof and siding jobs were due to the
severe storms experienced in the spring and summer of 1998. An analysis of building permit data
for 1998 showed that 946 single family residential properties were issued permits for re -roof and
siding jobs with a total value of $3,522,000. The 946 single family properties represent
approximately 13% of the total single family housing stock in the City.
MEMORANDUM
December 8, 1998
Page 3
Discussion with Greater Minneapolis Metropolitan Housing Corporation Northwest Housing
Resource Center Staff
• The Greater Minneapolis Metropolitan Housing Corporation ( GMMHC) through the Northwest
Housing Resource Center has been serving the cities of Brooklyn Center, New Hope,
Robbinsdale and Crystal since February of 1998. The objective of the Resource Center is to
assist homeowners with finding flexible financing tools to complete home improvement projects
and to assist homeowners through the construction process when renovating their homes. No
hard data is yet available for the number of projects done in each City but GMMHC staff has
indicated that several projects have been done in the City of Brooklyn Center.
• In discussing the issue of housing rehabilitation with GMMHC staff, the concept that appears to
be most feasible was to target existing rehabilitation funds at a specific neighborhood. There are
also some additional financing tools that are just becoming available through GMMHC for this
approach.
• One of the options for focusing rehabilitation would be to do a one year concerted effort at
targeting a specific portion of the southeast portion of the City. An example could be an area
bounded by 53rd on the south and 57th on the north and the Mississippi River on the east and
Humboldt Avenue on the west.
• The primary loan program that would be focused on would be the Community Fix -up Fund. The
Community Fix -up Fund is a Minnesota Housing Finance Agency loan program that can only be
used in targeted areas. Brooklyn Center has already received approval through Hennepin County
to target the southeast neighborhood for this program. The Community Fix -up Fund can provide
up to $25,000 in loan funds to households with a maximum income of up to $69,920. The
maximum term on the loan is 20 years with a 15 year term for loans under $15,000. The interest
rate on the loans is based on a sliding scale with 2% interest rate for incomes under $10,000, 4%
for $10,000 - $15,000, 6% for incomes $15,000 - $21,000 and 8% for incomes at $22,000 or
above. The current market rates for home improvement loans are in excess of 8% and in some
cases above 10 %.
• GMMHC staff would work with the City to market the targeted rehab program and would
provide initial counseling with clients to explain the program including eligible improvements and
loan terms. Hennepin County would be able to originate the Community Fix -up Fund loans since
they are a designated Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) lender for this program.
Community Fix -up Fund loans generally would focus on value added improvements.
• The advantage in marketing this program in 1999 would be that GMMHC has secured $300,000
in financing from MHFA to provide an incentive program for rehabilitation loans. Under this
incentive program, depending on income, recipients of Community Fix -up Fund loans could
MEMORANDUM
December 8, 1998
Page 4
receive as much as a 10 %, 12% or 15% rebate on their loan up to a maximum of $1,500.
GMMHC is still awaiting final guidelines from MHFA on this incentive program but it would
appear that this would be a significant asset in marketing a rehab program to a targeted
neighborhood.
• The success of the targeted marketing effort could be monitored over the course of the year. For
example, the number of people who may not qualify for fix -up loans could be collected
to determine if there is a need for some other type of rehab program to meet their needs.
• Based on the success of this targeted marketing effort, the City Council could then make a
determination as to how to use 1999 CDBG funds.
Conclusion and Recommendations
If the City Council would like to pursue sue the concept of a targeted marketing P P b g effort in the southeast
neighborhood, staff would meet with the GMMHC and Hennepin County staff to prepare a formal
for consideration program deration by the City Council.
• adoption: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
WITH CITY MANAGER
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the City Manager's employment contract;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a performance review of the City
Manager; and
WHEREAS, the terms and conditions set forth in the proposed Addendum attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference as EXHIBIT A are reasonable and proper; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to continue the City Manager's progression
within the salary range for the position of City Manager.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota, that the Mayor be and hereby is authorized to execute the attached Addendum
• to the employment contract with the City Manager.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
ADDENDUM TO CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Addendum is made and entered into by and between the City of Brooklyn Center, a Minnesota
municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City ") and Michael J. McCauley (hereinafter
referred to as the "Manager ") as of the day of .1998.
WHEREAS, the City and Manager have entered into an employment agreement dated November
27, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as the "Employment Agreement "); and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement as hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth in the Employment
Agreement and herein. City and Manager agree that the Employment Agreement is amended as
follows:
1. Section 8, paragraph A) of the Employment Agreement is amended by adding the following
sentence:
"Effective January 1, 1999, the Manager's annual salary shall be Eighty Eight Thousand
Dollars ($88,000) per year."
Except as explicitly modified in this Addendum, the Employment Agreement shall continue to be
in full force and effect.
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA EMPLOYEE
By
Myrna Kragness, Mayor Michael J. McCauley
By
Sharon Knutson, City Clerk