Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997 01-13 EDAP Regular Session EDA AGENDA • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER January 13, 1997 7 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda -The following items are considered to be routine by the Economic Development Authority and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at the end of Commission Consideration Items. a. Approval of Minutes - Commissioners not present at meetings will be recorded as abstaining from the vote on the minutes. 1. December 16, 1996 - Regular Session 2. December 20, 1996 - Special Session ® b. Resolution Designating Depositories of EDA Funds C. Resolution Electing Officers for the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center 4. Commission Consideration Item a. Resolution Authorizing Acquisition, Establishing Offer of Just Compensation, Authorizing Negotiation and Execution of Purchase Agreement, Authorizing Payment for Acquisition, Closing Costs and Relocation Claims for Various Properties Located in the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project -Requested Commission Action: - Motion to adopt resolution. 5. Adjournment • EDA AGENDA • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER January 13, 1997 7 p.m. 1. Call to Order 5�m 2. Roll Call Ai 3. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda -The following items are considered to be routine by the Economic Development Authority and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at the end of Commission Consideration Items. a. Approval of Minutes ('6L ran: _ f - Commissioners not present at meetings will be recor ed as TaZ g from the vote on the minutes. 1. December 16, 1996 - Regular Session 2. December 20, 1996 - Special Session • �'�� 0 J b. Resolution Designating Depositories of EDA Funds 7_ OZ c. Resolution Electing Officers for the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center 4. Commission Consideration Item a. Resolution Authorizing Acquisition, Establishing Offer of Just Compensation, Authorizing Negotiation and Execution of Purchase Agreement, Authorizing Payment for Acquisition, Closing Costs and Relocation Claims for Various Properties Located in the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project -Requested Commission Action: 0.3 - Motion to adopt resolution. d U 5. Adjournment DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION DECEMBER 16, 1996 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in regular session and was called to order by President Myrna Kragness at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL President Myrna Kragness, Commission members Kathleen Carmody, Debra Hilstrom, and Charles F.'Nichols, Sr. Also present: Executive Director Michael J. McCauley, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Council Secretary LeAnn Larson. Commission member Kristen Mann was absent and excused. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA A motion by Commission member Carmody and seconded by Commission member Nichols to approve the agenda and consent agenda as printed passed unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion by Commission member Carmody and seconded by Commission member Nichols to approve the minutes of the November 25, 1996 -- Regular Session as printed passed unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING RESOLUTION AUTHORI ING THE S i E OF EXCESS HIGHWAY RI HT OF WAY Executive Director McCauley explained the conveyance of a parcel of land that was owned by MN/Dot as turnback property to Gary and Suk Grabowski, 6337 Dupont Avenue North, adjacent property owners. The subject parcel was no longer needed by Mn/DOT, and the Grabowski's sought to acquire the property for the purposes of constructing a garage. The • 12/16/96 _1 _ DRAFT subject parcel has been conveyed by Mn/DOT to the City for the consideration of $996.70, and the Grabowski's have paid $996.70 plus required filing fees for the conveyance of this property • to them. A motion by Commission member Carmody and seconded by Commission member Hilstrom to open the public hearing passed unanimously. No public input was offered. A motion by Commission member Carmody and seconded by Commission member Nichols to close the public hearing passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 96-32 Member Carmody introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF EXCESS HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Hilstrom and passed unanimously. COMMISSION CONSIDERATION ITEM • RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION, ESTABLISHING OFFER OF JUST COMPENSATION AUTHORIZING NEGOTIATION A ND EXECUTION OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT FOR ACQUISITION AND CLOSING COSTS FOR VARIOUS PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE 53RD AVENUE DEVELOPMENT AND LINKAGE PROJECT Executive Director McCauley stated that appraisals have been completed on ten properties in the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project. This resolution would authorize negotiations and execution of purchase agreements within the limits of the appraisal amounts. Upon approval by the EDA, Evergreen Land Services Company will present a letter to the respective homeowners offering to purchase their property at the property's appraised value. If the offer of appraised value is acceptable to the owner, the EDA Executive Director is authorized to execute the purchase agreement on behalf of the EDA. In addition to the purchase agreement, Evergreen Land Services Company will be meeting with eligible homeowners and tenants to prepare relocation claims. This is a separate process from the purchase agreement, and this resolution would provide that the EDA Executive Director be authorized to pay any claim pursuant to the City's purchasing policy. 12/16/96 -2- DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 96 -33 • Member Hilstrom introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION, ESTABLISHING OFFER OF JUST COMPENSATION, AUTHORIZING NEGOTIATION A ND EXECUTION OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT FOR ACQUISITION AND CLOSING COSTS FOR VARIOUS PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE 53RD AVENUE DEVELOPMENT AND LINKAGE PROJECT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Carmody and passed unanimously. RESOLUTION APPROVING FORM OF OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT FOR 53RD AVENUE DEVELOPMENT AND LINKAGE PROJECT AND APPROVING SCHEDULE OF VALUES FOR VARIOUS SALVAGE ITEMS FROM THE PROPERTIES IN THE 53RD AVENUE DEVELOPMENT AND LINKAGE PROJECT Executive Director McCauley explained the need for an Occupancy Agreement which would be used by Evergreen Land Services Company when they negotiate the purchase agreement for the properties in the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project. In response to those households choosing to stay in their homes through the end of the current school year, this Occupancy Agreement proposes a vacation date for the properties as late as June 30, 1997. Also, the issue of homeowners salvaging certain items from their properties (such as water heaters, water softeners, furnaces, air conditioning units, etc.) has prompted staff and Evergreen Land Services Company to recommend that some nominal cost to the homeowner be charged for any items salvaged prior to closing. The salvage costs would be deducted from the homeowner's final payout at closing. RESOLUTION NO. 96-34 Member Carmody introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING FORM OF OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT FOR 53RD AVENUE DEVELOPMENT AND LINKAGE PROJECT AND APPROVING SCHEDULE OF VALUES FOR VARIOUS SALVAGE ITEMS FROM THE PROPERTIES IN THE 53RD AVENUE DEVELOPMENT AND LINKAGE PROJECT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Hilstrom and passed unanimously. • 12/16/96 -3- DRAFT RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFICATIONS NO 1 AND NO 2 TO THE TAX • INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO, 3 AND REQUESTING THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL Executive Director McCauley noted very recent correspondence and a recommendation from the Hennepin County Administrator regarding the modifications to TIF District No. 3. In order to fully assess the County's letter and to see what action the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners would be taking on this TIF proposal, Mr. McCauley suggested setting a special meeting for Friday, December 20, 1996, at 8:30 a.m., to address this issue. A motion by Commission member Nichols and seconded by Commission member Hilstrom to set a special meeting for Friday, December 20, 1996, 8:30 a.m. at City Hall, passed with President Kragness and members Nichols and Hilstrom voting aye. Member Carmody voted naye. RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CARPET REPLACEMENT AT THE EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER Executive Director McCauley stated that the carpet at the Earle Brown Heritage Center was in need of replacement. The City has received a quote of $52,723.10 off of a State contract. Fifty thousand dollars in operating revenues in excess of operating expenses for the calendar year 1996 for EBHC would be carried forward and used to defray $50,000 of the costs of the capital expenditure for carpet replacement. • RESOLUTION NO. 96 -35 Member Carmody introduced ntroduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CARPET REPLACEMENT AT THE EARL E BROWN HERITAGE CENTER The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Hilstrom and passed unanimously. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL BROOKLYN CENTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 1997 PURSUANT TO MSA CHAPTER 469.107. SUBDIVISION 1 Executive Director McCauley presented the budget necessary for operation of the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority during 1997. 12/16/96 -4- • DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 96 -36 • Member Nichols introduced the following esolution and moved its adoption: g p RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL BROOKLYN CENTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 1997 PURSUANT TO MSA CHAPTER 469.107, SUBDIVISION 1 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Carmody and passed unanimously. RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TO LEVY TAXES FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE YEAR 1997 Executive Director McCauley explained that the Economic Development Authority requests the City of Brooklyn Center to levy a property tax for the benefit of the EDA for the year 1997. The FDA's tax levy for 1997 will be included in the City's certification to the Hennepin County Auditor of a final tax levy. RESOLUTION NO. 96 -37 • Member Hilstrom introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TO LEVY TAXES FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE YEAR 1997 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Carmody and passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT A motion by Commission member Hilstrom and seconded by Commission member Carmody to adjourn the meeting at 7:16 p.m. passed unanimously. President Recorded and transcribed by: LeAnn Larson • 12/16/96 -5- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIAL SESSION DECEMBER 20, 1996 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in special session and was called to order by President Myrna Kragness at 8:35 a.m. ROLL CALL President Myrna Kragness and Commission members Debra Hilstrom and Charles F. Nichols, Sr. Commission member Kathleen Carmody entered the meeting at 8:40 a.m. Also present: Executive Director Michael J. McCauley, EDA Secretary/Community Development Director Brad Hoffinan, and City Clerk Sharon Knutson. Absent: Commission member Kristen Mann. • COMMISSION CONSIDERATION ITEM MODIFICATIONS NO. 1 AND NO 2 TO THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO 3 AND REQUESTING THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL Executive Director McCauley explained this item was tabled from the December 16, 1996, meeting because of a memorandum received from the Hennepin County Administrator's office recommending that Hennepin County request that the TIF plan for District No. 3 be further modified to reimburse the County for $2 million of road improvement costs to CSAH 130. This would greatly hinder efforts to redevelop Brookdale. Mr. McCauley talked with Hennepin County Commissioner Mike Opat and received a memorandum from him regarding the actions taken by the County Administrator prior to the Hennepin County Board taking a final position. Commissioner Opat was working to assist the City and had not been aware of the County Administrator's letter prior to its being sent. He said the County Board has not discussed this issue and so this issue raised by the recommendation of the County Administrator is unresolved. The City Manager was hopeful that the matter would be resolved in a positive manner with Hennepin County. Mr. McCauley said the EDA has three options regarding this Tax Increment Financing Plan modification: 1) go forward with it; 2) table it to 1997; or 3) take no action. He recommended the EDA take no action until Brooklyn Center meets with Hennepin County in January and can come back with some plan with • 12/20/96 _1 _ DRAFT Hennepin County participation and involvement. • No action was taken by the EDA. ADJOURNMENT A motion by Commission member Hilstrom and seconded by Commission member Nichols to adjourn the meeting at 8:39 a.m. passed unanimously. President • 12/20/96 -2- 3b MEMORANDUM TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Charlie Hansen, Finance Director C H DATE: January 8, 1997 SUBJECT: Resolution Designating Depositories of EDA Funds In January of each year, the Commission has passed a resolution designating the banks which are authorized as depositories of EDA funds. Marquette Bank Brookdale is where the EDA has its checking account. Old Kent Bank & Trust Company /Transglobal Systems Inc. is a clearinghouse depository for credit card sales at the Earle Brown Heritage Center. Riverside Bank is the checking account used by D'Amico and Partners, Inc. for the catering operations located at the Earle Brown Heritage Center. Surplus EDA funds are pooled with City funds and invested through the institutions listed on the City Resolution designating depositories. • • Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: • EDA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES OF EDA FUND WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority Commission has authority over EDA funds including the safekeeping and disbursement of public g P g P moneys NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the list of authorized depositories established in EDA Resolution 96 -02 is amended to include and. 1. that Marquette Bank Brookdale, Riverside Bank, and Old Kent Bank & Trust Company /Transglobal Systems Inc. are hereby designated as the depositories of funds for the Economic Development Authority. 2. that the EDA assistant treasurer is authorized to deposit EDA funds to the extent that repayment is aranteed b the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and � Y P rp such additional funds not to exceed the amount of 90% of collateral pledged by the depository to the EDA. 3. that the EDA assistant treasurer is authorized to deposit surplus EDA funds into the City's pooled investment account and invest them according to the policy and restrictions pertaining to that account. 4. that the EDA treasurer and assistant treasurer are authorized by the EDA Commission to act for the EDA in any of its business with the depositories. Date President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • resolution \edaresoRdeposit 3 G • Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ELECTING OFFICERS FOR THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 469.096 provides that an economic development authority shall elect a president, treasurer, and secretary on an annual basis. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority in and for the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the Authority hereby reby elects the following fficers to serve through December 31 1997 or such later g g , date as their successors are elected and 4 ualified: President/Treasurer: Myrna Kragness Vice- President: (Mayor pro tem) Assistant Treasurer: Charlie Hansen Secretary: G. Brad Hoffman Date President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • Memorandum To: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager From: Tom Bublitz, Community Development Specialises l Date: January 7, 1997 Subject: Resolution Authorizing Acquisition, Establishing Offer of Just Compensation, Authorizing Negotiation and Execution of Purchase Agreement, Authorizing Payment for Acquisition, Closing Costs and Relocation Claims for Various Properties Located in the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project The status of the appraisal and acquisition process for the 28 properties included in the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project is summarized by the following. • Of the 28 properties included in the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project, four have been acquired. • Of the remaining 24 properties to be acquired, nine appraisals were approved by the EDA Board at their December 16, 1996, meeting, and negotiations are underway for acquisition of • the properties. It is anticipated a number of these properties will close at the end of January. • Ten appraisals for EDA consideration are included with this memorandum. If these ten appraisals are approved by the EDA Board, offers will be made to these property owners based on the appraised values approved by the Board. • Of the five final and remaining properties, the appraisal inspections have been completed or scheduled for all properties, and the final appraisals will be presented to the EDA Board at the second meeting in January. The following table provides a summary of the ten appraisals submitted for EDA approval and a comparison of the appraised values to the 1996 estimated market values (EMVs) for each of the properties. It should be noted that review appraisals confirm the values established by the initial appraisals on all properties, with the exception of 810 -53rd Avenue North. • Memorandum to Michael J. McCauley • January 7, 1997 Page 2 Address Appraised Value 1996 EMV Percent Over 1996 EMV 600 -53rd Ave. No. $69,000 $59,300 16% 5315 -4th St. No. $66,000 $56,800 16% 516 -53rd Ave. No. $73,500 $62,600 17% 5306 Camden Ave. No. $52,000 $66,200 ( -21 %) 814 -53rd Ave. No. $64,500 $53,700 20% 702 -53rd Ave. No. $64,000 $56,400 13 %0 5318 Camden Ave. No. $78,500 $69,600 13% 5305 -4th St. No. $67,500 $62,700 8% 722 -53rd Ave. No. $67,000 $56,400 19% • The average "percentage over EMV" for the nine properties listed above is 11.2 %. If the property at 5306 Camden Avenue North is excluded, the average is 15.25 %. The budget estimate is 15% over 1996 EMV. In addition to the properties listed in the table above, an appraisal has been completed on the property at 810 -53rd Avenue North. The property at 810 -53rd Avenue North has undergone a major fire and as the appraisal report indicates, is "damaged beyond repair." The final conclusion of value for the property is based on the land value of the property less demolition costs of the building, which results in a final value conclusion of $8,800. The review appraisal has indicated a slight decrease in the estimated cost of demolition from the initial appraisal, resulting in a final conclusion of value of $10,000. It is recommended the review appraisal be approved by the EDA Board as just compensation for the property at 810 -53rd Avenue North. Upon approval by the EDA, Evergreen Land Services will present a letter to the respective homeowners offering to purchase their property at the property's appraised value. If the offer of appraised value is acceptable to the owner, the EDA Executive Director is authorized to execute the purchase agreement on behalf of the EDA. A copy of the purchase agreement is attached. In addition to the purchase agreement, Evergreen Land Services Co. will be meeting with eligible homeowners and tenants to prepare relocation claims. This is a separate process from the purchase agreement, and the attached resolution will provide the EDA Executive Director to • authorize payment of the claim pursuant to the City's purchasing policy. r • PURCHASE AGREEMENT This Purchase Agreement is made 1 199 , by and between and (collectively referred to as "Seller ") ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, (EDA) a public body corporate and politic under the laws of Minnesota, located at 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 ( "Buyer "). Rpri 1 s A. Seller is the owner of that certain real estate located at _ City of Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as: together with all improvements thereon (the "Property "). B. Buyer desires to acquire the by voluntary sale • in fee simple absolute. C. Seller agrees to sell the Property to Buyer. A,_r_ ePingn� In consideration of the mutual agreements made herein, Seller and Buyer agree as follows: 1. Offeg - ceptan Buyer agrees to purchase and Seller agrees to sell the Property under the terms and conditions stated in this Agreement. Seller is being allowed, as part of this Agreement, to remove the r ers n 1 r r p o a p ro pe rty more fully described in the attached Bill of Sale. with the exception of said described items, the sale contemplated by this agreement includes all fixt ures and improvements on the property, including storm widows and inserts, storm doors, screens, awnings, window shades, blinds, curtain /traverse /drapery rods, attached lighting fixtures with bulbs, plumbing fixtures, sump pumps, water heaters, heating systems, built -in appliances, water softeners, garbage disposals, installed carpeting, work benches, television antennas and hood fans. Upon delivery of the deed, Sellers shall also deliver a Bill of Sale for the above . ersonal property. P P P Y • 2. Purchase Pr_i The purchase price for the Property shall be ($ ) and shall be payable as follows: • a. ($ ) as earnest money, payable upon EDA execution of this agreement. b. The balance of the Purchase Price in cash or by certified funds or the equivalent on the Closing Date (as hereafter defined). The Buyer, in its discretion and in partial payment of the purchase price, may assume or take title subject to any existing indebtedness encumbering the Subject Property, in which case the cash to be paid at the time of closing shall be reduced by the then remaining indebtedness. 3. Marketahili.y of Title The Seller shall, on or prior to the date of this Purchase Agreement, deliver to the Buyer all unrecorded instruments relating to interests in the Subject Property, and an abstract of title or registered property abstract, as applicable. The Buyer shall, at its cost, have the abstract certified to a current date or, if necessary, have a registered property abstract prepared. After the date of delivery of the abstract or registered property abstract or the date of this Agreement, whichever is later, the Buyer shall have • up to twenty (20) days for the examination thereof, and to deliver written objections, if any, to the Seller. Seller shall have 30 days after receipt of Buyer's written objections to make title marketable. a. If the Seller proceeds in good faith to make title marketable but fails to do so within the 30 day period, Buyer may terminate this Agreement without any liability on its part, and Seller shall promptly refund to Buyer the Earnest Money paid. b. If Seller fails to make title marketable within the 30 day period due to Seller's failure to proceed in good faith, or, if title is marketable but Seller defaults in its obligations under this Agreement, Buyer may seek any of the following remedies permitted under law: (i) terminate this Agreement by notice to Seller, in which event the Seller shall refund to Buyer the Earnest Money paid; or (ii) seek specific performance of this Agreement. C. If title is marketable or is corrected within the 30 day period and Buyer defaults in any of the agreements herein, Seller may terminate this Agreement and retain all payments made under this Agreement as liquidated damages. • The termination period for a Notice of Cancellation of this Agreement shall be 30 days as permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 559.21, subd. 4. • d. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, Buyer retains the right to initiate condemnation proceedings against the subject property to assure timely acquisition. 4. Conditions to Clnsin_a The closing of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement and the obligation of the Buyer to purchase the Property shall be subject to the following conditions: a. Buyer shall have determined on or before the Closing Date that it is satisfied, based upon the results of and matters disclosed by any environmental or soil investigations or testing of the property, that there are no environmental or soil conditions that would materially affect the value of the Property or that would interfere with Buyer's proposed use of the Property for residential redevelopment purposes. Buyer and Seller each acknowledge that environmental contamination of any kind would interfere with Buyer's proposed use of the Property. b. Buyer shall have reviewed and approved title to • the property pursuant to Paragraph 3 of this Agreement. 5. F.nvironmpnral and Soil Tnvestigation Buyer and its agents shall have the right, its sole option and risk, to enter the Property for the purpose of testing soils, testing for asbestos containing materials, surveying, or doing such other work as may be necessary to determine the suitability of the Property for uses by the Buyer. If Buyer investigates and tests the Property pursuant to this section, Buyer shall pay all costs and expenses of such investigation and testing. Upon request of Buyer, Seller shall also permit Buyer to review all environmental reports and files, if any, relating to the Property and in Seller's possession_ 6. Real Fstatp Taxpa On or before the Closing Date, Seller will pay all delinquent real estate taxes, penalties and interest, if any. Real estate taxes payable in the year of closing will be prorated between Buyer and Seller as of the Closing Date. Seller warrants that real estate taxes payable in 199 are (homestead)(non- homestead). 7. yne.ial Assessments On or before the Closing Date, Seller will pay all installments of special assessments certified for payment payable ent with real estate taxes a able in the year of closin Seller w' Se er ill a on the Closing Date all other special g• C os • pay g P assessments levied as of the date of this Agreement and assessments, if any, pending as of the Closing Date. Seller's _... __, _sic _...:,� o....�o��__ �c, - .... "=.,v "-;ivu = c:-c•. r;;uc 0� • provision for payment of pending assessments shall be by payment into escrow of 1.5 times the estimated amount of the assessments. Defe Ass ssm n ,s and Tax _s Seller shall pay on date of closing any deferred real estate taxes or special assessments payment of which is required as a result of the closing of this sale. 8. Closing Da te. The closing shall take place at a location designated by Buyer on , 199 9. Do . nn n S to he Deli vered at losing On the Closing Date, Buyer shall deliver to Seller the balance of the purchase Price and Seller shall deliver to Buyer: a. A duly executed general warranty deed, conveying marketable title to the Property to Buyer, subject only to: (i) building and zoning laws, ordinances, state and federal regulations, (ii) utility and drainage easements which do not interfere with Buyer's intended use of the property; (iii) reservation of any minerals or mineral rights to the State of Minnesota. b. A duly executed affidavit of Seller. • C. A receipt evidencing ng payment of real estate taxes for which payment was due prior to the Closing Date. d. All documents necessary to establish marketable title to Buyer. 1O. CInsinq C'nsts Buyer shall pay all expenses of examination of title and recording of the Seller's warranty deed. Buyer shall also pay state deed tax. Seller shall pay all recording fees and charges relating to the obtaining of and filing of instruments required to make title marketable. 11 UtilitieG Seller shall be responsible for payment of all utilities and insurance premiums through the date of closing or date of vacation, whichever is later 12. Covenants, genrps nta i ons and WArranti p_of l l r a. The signatories to this Agreement represent that they are the fee owners of the Property and are authorized to execute this . A re men g e t b. Seller warrants that it will take no actions to • encumber title to the Property after the date of this Agreement and that it will indemnify and hold the Buyer harmless against any liens or encumbrances established in violation of this provision. i • C. Seller warrants that it has not used the Property for the storage of hazardous substances or petroleum products and, as of the date of this Agreement, is not aware of any facts the existence of which would constitute a violation of any local, state or federal environmental law, regulation or review procedure, or which would give any person a valid claim under the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act or the federal Comprehensive Environmental response, Compensation and Liability Act. d. Seller warrants that there has been no labor or material furnished to the Property for which payment has not been made. e. Seller warrants that there are no present violations of any restrictions relating to the use or improvement of the Property. f. The warranties made in this paragraph shall survive closing without merger in the deed. 13. Covenant q, Representations, and Warrant of Buy,Qr, • Buyer is the EDA in and for the City of Brooklyn Center under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the power to enter into this Agreement and to carry out its obligations hereunder. The signatories to this Agreement represent that they are authorized to execute this Agreement on Buyer's behalf. 14. No Broker Tnvnly d . The Seller and Buyer represent and warrant to each other that there is no broker involved in this transaction with whom it has negotiated or to whom it has agreed to pay a broker commission or finder's fee in conne with negotiations for the sale of the Property. 15. Pnssessi�n Anci Tn gnranra Seller shall deliver Possession of the Property to Buyer on the Closing Date in the same condition as exists on the date of this Agreement, with the exception of removal of the items described in paragraph 1 hereof. Risk of loss from casualty or any liability incurred by or as a result of the use or contact with the Property shall be the Seller's until delivery of possession to the Buyer as herein provided. 16 Personal Proper y . On the date when possession is transferred to Buyer, the Seller shall have removed from the Property any and all personal property belonging to him which is • not included in this sale. Any personal property which is not removed by the date of transfer of possession shall be considered abandoned. The Seller agrees to indemnify and hold the Buyer harmless for all costs incurred in disposing of personal property • left in or at the Property by the Seller after the date of transfer of possession. 17. R_ammov?1 nf Hn7 rrinus Material. Seller, prior to vacation of the Property, shall remove all substances which, under state or federal law, must be disposed of at an approved disposal facility. This includes, but is not limited to, used oil, paints, solvents, fertilizers, poisons, and the like. 18. Relo-a-ion Costs The Buyer acknowledges that any responsibility to pay relocation costs and benefits in accordance with Minn_sota S-a s , Chapter 117, is a separate obligation, no part of which is reflected in the purchase price contained in paragraph 2 above. 19. WL- 1 T)i-.RC1nSii Buyer acknowledges, to the extent applicable, receipt of a well disclosure statement from Seller, attached as Exhibit A to this Agreement. 20. nisnl os urP • Tn i vi d 3a1 S -wary - Treatment Sys m_ Sellers disclose that there (is) (is not) an individual sewage treatment system on or serving the Property. If there is an individual sewage treatment system on or serving the Property, ® Sellers disclose that the system (is) (is not) in use, and Sellers further disclose that the type of system is a system and the location is shown on the map attached as Exhibit B to this Purchase Agreement. 21. Entirp Agreement; Am n m-n s This Agreement represents the complete and final agreement of the parties and supersedes any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understanding between the parties. This Agreement may be amended only in writing, signed by both parties. 22. Sindi nq ; Ass,i gnm,,gnt . This Purchase Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. Each party agrees to give the other party notice prior to assigning its interest in the Property or this Agreement. 23. Notice Any notice, demand, request or other communication which may or shall be given or served to or on Seller by Buyer or to or on Buyer by Seller shall be deemed to have been given or served on the date the same is deposited in the United States mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid and addressed as follows: • • (1) If to Seller: (2) If to Buyer: Thomas R. Bublitz Community Development Specialist City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55443 23. SneCifir Performance This Purchase Agreement may be specifically enforced by the Buyer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date written above. BUYER SELLERS: Economic Development Authority Y in and for the City of Brooklyn Center • By. Michael J. McCauley Executive Director C : rK b / 1•'b/ 1)tN 10teMI /...Ot.. • 1+MForm No. 1519-W u�. ww. w. i ouew« n eu� «..�nN.. ivuo� u � � ice• bIINNESOTA WELL DISCLOSURE STATE.IMENT • Minnesota Law requires that before signing an agreement to sell or transfer real property after June 30, 1990, the seller must disclose information in writing to the buyer about the status and Iocation of all known wells on the property. This requirement is satisfied by delivering to the buyer either a statement by the seller that the seller does not )now of any wells on the property, or a disclosure statement indicating the legal description and county and a map showing the location of each well. In the disclosure statement the seller must indicate, for each well, whether the well is in use, not in use or sealed. A seller who fads to disclose the existence of a well at the time of sale and knew of or had reason to know of. the existence of a well is liable to the buyer for costs relating to the sealing of the well and reasonable attorney fees for collection of costs from the seller, if the action is commenced within six years after the date the buyer closed the purchase of the real property where the well is located. Instructions for completion of this form are on the reverse side. I. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Street address: cur 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3. WELL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (Check the appropriate box.) ❑ The seller certifies that the seller does not know of any wells on the above described real • property If this option is checked, then skip to the last line and sign and date this statement. ❑ The seller certifies that the following wells are located on the above described real property. MN. Unique Well Year of Well IN USE NOT IN SEALED Well No. Depth Const. Type USE Well 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ Well 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ Well 3 ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. SEALED WELL INFORMATION For each well designated as sealed above, complete this section. When was the well sealed? Who sealed the well? Was a Sealed Well Report filed with the Minnesota Department of Health? Yes No 5. MAP Complete the attached map showing the location of each well on the real property. 6. CERTIFICATION BY SELLER I certify that the information provided above is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE WELL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT DEFINITION A "well" means an excavation that is drilled, cored, bored, washed, driven, dug, jetted. or • otherwise constructed if the excavation is intended for the location. diversion, artificial recharge, or acquisition of groundwater. MINNESOTA UNIQUE WELL NUMBER All new wells constructed AFTER January 1, 1975 should have been assigned a Minnesota unique well number by the person constructing the well. If the well was constructed after this date you should have the unique well number in your property records. If you are unable to locate your unique welt number and the well was constructed AFTER January 1, 1975, contact your well contractor. If no unique well number is available, please indicate the depth and year of construction for each well. WELL TYPE Use one of the following terms to describe the well type. WATER WELL A water well is any type of well used to extract groundwater for private or public use. Examples of water wells are: domestic wells, drive-point wells, dug wells. remedial wells, and municipal wells. IRRIGATION WELL An irrigation well is a well used to irrigate agricultural lands. These are typically large diameter wells connected to a large pressure distribution system. MONITORING WELL A monitoring well is a well used to monitor groundwater contamination. The well is typically used to access groundwater for the extraction of samples. DEWATERING WELL A dewatering well is a well used to lower groundwater levels to allow for construction or use of underground spaces. INDUSTRIAIJCOMMERCLAL WELL An industriallcommercial well is a nonpotable well used to extract groundwater for any nonpotable use including groundwater thermal • thermal exchange wells (heat pumps and heat loops). WELL USE STATUS Indicate the use status of each well CHECK ONLY 1 BOX PER WELL. IN USE A well is "in use" if the well is producing sufficient water to meet its intended use and is being operated on a regular basis. NOT IN USE A well is "not in use" if the well is inoperable and not in use or the well is disconnected from a power supply and is not sealed. SEALED A well is "sealed "if the well has been sealed by a licensed contractor and there is a Sealed Well Report on rile at the Minnesota Department of Health. A properly sealed well has been sealed by a licensed contractor by pumping grout throughout the entire borehole from tae bottom of the well- NOTE: If a well is inoperable and not in use or disconnected from a power source, it must be sealed by a licensed well contractor or a well owner must obtain a maintenance permit from the Minnesota Department of Health and pay an annual maintenance fee. If a well is operable and properly maintained, a maintenance permit is not required. • REVIEW APPRAISAL A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION 1. Owner of Property: James S. Matti 2. Location of Property: 810 53rd Ave. N., Brooklyn Center, Mn. 3. Appraiser(s): J. Scott Renne and Marri Kunik Renne 4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project 5. Just Compensation: $10,000.00 B. DATA 1. Highest and Best Use: R -I Single Family 2. Zoning: R -2 3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost • Land value determined by comparable sales. 4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied. 5. Market Approach: Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects neighborhood. Two sales were "arms - length ", two sales utilized were estate sales and one sale was to government. All sales were in the proximity of the subject. Note was made in the appraisal of the estate sales and the government sale. • C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made. All data appears to be representative of the market for the subject property. Adjustments to Renee's conclusions of cost demolition are justified. Demolition cost information recieved after the appraisal was prepared has been utilized by the review appraiser. The review appraisers conclusion is that an appropriate adjustment to item 3 on page 11 of the appraisal is as follows: Value as if Vacant $13,000 Less Demo Costs ($3,000 Equals Value As Is $10,000 • D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with applicable standards. No different approaches to value were deemed necessary. E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the value of $3,800 (Eight Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars) recommended by Mr. & Mrs. Renee be adjusted to $10,000 (Ten Thousand Dollars) for for December 28, 1996. • CERTIFICATION I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by James S. Matti, on this 7th Day of January, 1997 and certify the following statements regarding this review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge: 1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with knowledge and without undue stimulus. ?. 1 have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as comparable sales by the appraiser. 3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein. 4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements. 5. I have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other identification. establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies and examines the appraisal report reviewed. Based upon my review of the above- listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of January 7, 1997, is recommended at $10,000.00 (TenThousand Dollars). SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi �� Review Appraiser /� v �� Date / ' ' Cert. General Real Prop. ==1003156 • Witness Date J. Scott Renne, MM • �'� ,, i Real Estate Appraiser - Consultant - REALTOR 2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH - MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 1612) 871 -1417 FAX (612) 871 -1481 • PAGER (612) 661-3256 i December 28, 1996 Brad Hoffman Community Development Director City of Brooklyn Center #; 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Subject: Analysis and appraisal of a property located at 810 53rd Avenue North, Brooklyn Center (Matti property); Estimates of value 1. "As Is" 2. As if the property had no fire damage 3. Replacement Cost New of Improvements; Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary appraisal report Dear Mr. Hoffman: Pursuant to your request, I have completed a market value appraisal report of the above referenced property. • The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple r interest of the subject property as of December 7, 1996. The report is subject to the contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report. The summary of 1, the estimates is shown in the following table. t Description/Assumption Market Value as of 12 -7 -96 As if there had been no fire damage $54,500 Replacement Cost New per Marshall Valuation Service $52,200 Market Value "As is" taking demolition costs into $8,800 account The term market value is defined as: The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to l cash, or in other l recise revealed terms, or which the specified ro fights should P Y f PPe n1' g sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self - • interest and assuming that neither is under undue duress. ( e The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purp roP e rtY cq a uisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the U� rm ble P Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report. The scope of the assignment included: Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on December 7, 1996 by J. Scott Renee, MAI. Jim Matti, owner of the property, accompanied the appraiser on the inspection. Marri K. Renee, CAE made an inspection of the exterior of the property. - Survey nd analysis ysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale - Highest and best use analysis - Application of the appraisal process - Application of the Marshall Valuation Service to develop Replacement Cost New and estimate demolition costs Review of information provided by Mr. Matti A general description of legal data is: 1 - According to Hennepin County records the fee owner is James S. Matti The PID is 01- 118 -21 -34 -0030; The legal description is: West 50 feet of East 150 feet o Lot 11 Block 3 B 11 f e vue Acres - The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $691.09 plus specials of $8.87 for a total of $699.56 based on an estimated market value of Land $16,700; Building $30,900; Total $47,600 - According o Hennepin g p County records the property sold in June, 1983 for $50,200. Page 2 i The unit of comparison will be the site value. The offerings for sale receive limited • consideration in the reconciliation process. S1 and 01 offer a comparison into the estimate of the appropriate land time adjustment. Its asking price is 25% higher than the sale price of $14,000 in May 1994 or an annualized increase of 9.7 %. Because it has not sold the time adjustment will be 4.0% per year, similiar to the improved properties. s •; v:.::i +• }' { {. } }: ?i: {{ }:{::: v: { {4' ?:::: •: {: :: ': {; :•:: { {{ ,::: :: ? ? :. y :::: n:':. >'::.:. v.:.}: {., {...:;;.} :iii: i:`ri }i'Li } } }!;; }x`i:: %Ci`: ? ^: ? }:y!;: ? ;•}:':? yi}} :; }: } {• }:: }};t:.}a,:....- . }:::: ii::i:!j; } :'.v }:: . isii:: i;; ?i::}! }:•:}:• } %�!: ??ii ?i } } }} i:'F -.:v iiiiii.,: ?:: ?i: } } }:::•. ? ^:• } }:i �::v: }:: ?•!! %�i:,: �.: :.... n......... ?... {n•:.:: ,::..:..::::w;• < :::.::::.::::.:.:::.: :.::: nv: nv:.:.::v::.: n,::... :..r . ... :, .... O'•4.v::CVi::'v : :vM: , ..n \+t :T'•: { >:::::::: w:. S���'� •�.2 ;:i7µ# . v.,> 4 .> h •. • }: •.:• }\: } :i'ii:<i:iii!Yii iii':: _':iii::ii::iiiii;C:;ii: } ; ?i'!L! }: ?�!' { {:'::{ ?:•!!:: }.:•: �:i.} : {(..: �.... :•. } . � :.:......................}!}:::• x. }�::G:• }}:{• }:w::.v;• ? ^' {. } } } n..:,•. {•: i:::::•: vn .. ,:.k +: }• ..:... ' ... :...v::.v4:.........::.... .:�nwx•:::.,w.�:: v:. � ::: :........:...::.�:::. �:::::::::::::, v.:v.. •.v::::........ ... n........ ........'.............v ... ........ n;•:::nw::,v ••1:..... n....}• : T:...: v.:v.:w•: :.n:.••,: :; .v• •nw:::v :: :•:.. :.:. .:..n..........n......:.:.::w:: ::v:;:: ........... ;•.,. ::...:.::.....:nv: : \: ;r.:: nv: :vw:n:: •: -... \ •:: : .......v.n :. •`>t::..:v. �:::•:::::::.� r.......... :::::::::::::::!:!, }n:::x: ?ri;;` }; {•. r\:...... ............................... n.:...:..... , :.....:..{......:..3.. rr \,. Y..n .. .nv':• }:.:: rv: • SALE PROP FIN. COND MKT. PRICE ADJ PRICE RGTS OF COND ADJ for PHY. OTH NET PRICE # CONV SALE (TIME) F1N,CON LOC. CHR- ER ADJ. & TIME sl $14,000 0 1 0 0 +10.346 1 $15,142 0 +596 1 0 +346 1 $16,214 S2 $21,000 0 0 0 +3.7% $21,777 0 -15% 0 -13% $18410 S3 $29,000 0 0 0 +4.0% $30,160 -15% -20% 0 -35% $19,604 01 $17 ,300 0 0 1 0 1 0 $17,50 0 +5% 0 1 +5% $M373 02 $22,300 0 0 T 0 0 $22400 0 -15% 0 1 -15% 5191125 • Based upon this analysis an estimate of the value of the subject site as if vacant is $18,000. } 2. Estimate of Demolition Costs The subject property is improved with an residential use totaling 744 square feet of above grade area (including entry porch) and 528 square feet of basement. Because land only is being valued, any buyer would recognize that any costs required to bring the land to its vacant and usable state will be deducted from the market value. There is probably little salvage value left in the building. These costs are best estimated from obtaining bids from reputable demolition contractors. This estimate is based upon a national cost service and can be updated based upon any local bids which would be the most accurate way of determining the dimunition in value due to the existing structure. The Marshall Valuation Service in Section 66, page 8 states: Avers costs o removal p er square f oot o total build fl oor are includ loadi � f P 4 f f g� �, g g and hauling but not dump fees. It is also assumed that the materials have no salvage value. Costs for removal vary greatly depending on the size and complexity of the job • Page 10 and extent of contamination regarding hazardous materials. The ollowin cost ran f g es g • are in some cases based on one or only a few removal projects and should be considered as very rough guides. Due to the number of variables involved we would suggest that whenever possible survey, bid or contract costs should be obtained The Service shows demolition costs of Class D building (i.e. wood frame) $1.90 to $2.95; mid -point $2.43 - Class C building (apply to basement area ) $2.43 to $3.56• mid-point of $3.00 Ap the mid pp yuig pint of these ranges would result in an estimated cost of; 744 square feet at $2.43 plus 528 square feet at $3.00 equals $3,392 x current cost multiplier of 1.09 x local multiplier of 1.14 equals total of $4,215. Plus dump fees estimated to be $2,000 plus utility disconnects estimated to be $1,500 and $1,500 miscellaneous /contingency results in a total estimated demolition cost of $9,215. This cost appears to be lower than the "going rate" for single family demolition costs in the local market. It does not consider any asbestos removal costs. Asbestos removal represents an even wider range with full abatement ranging from $14.04 per square foot to $34.56 per square foot. The amount of asbestos is not known so a comparison cannot be made. 3. Calculation of "As Is" Value Using this estimate of demolition cost, the net value of the property would be: Value as if Vacant $18,000 less demo costs $� 9,215 Equals Value as Improved $ 8,785 Rounded to $ 8,800 t • Page 11 Reconciliation Based on "Prior to Fire" Assu • As sumptions Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the subject property as of December 7, 1996 is: ?: x• ?: ??,i• ?xv } }FF ...• .v:: nvnv:: ........ v: v ?•:4:4:.} . { NJ •",.x:. .... ... .. v ivxvv?x \: {.i:4 ? } }: {•::::::. t:::;.,..}.::v:.:!. {:4 }: a. .: {�v }X h \\a n.J., ?h��. ............. } {.}, �C ti'• }nv; ... n.....::ti y, Y.;.,v:::: `. }v { .�':: h\ti:•ji% :4:'} :;i:: }. ii);�tit:;:; Cost Approach $52,000 ales Comparison Approach $55,000 S Income Approach Not applied VALUE CONCLUSION $54400 The conclusions for all information analyzed in th table. Yz a appraisal is shown in the following Description/Assumption Market Value as of 12 -7 -96 As if there had been no fire damage $54,500 g Replacement Cost New per Marshall Valuation Service $52,200 Market Value "As ' " is taking demolition costs into $8,800 account This conclusion is based upon our personal inspection and review of the subject ro e comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process. p p' Respectfully Submitted, J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE Marri K Renne, CAE Page 20 REVIEW APPRAISAL • A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION 1. Owner of Property: Gary W. Thom 2. Location of Property: 600 53rd Ave. N. Ave. N., Brooklyn Center, Mn. 3. Appraiser(s): J. Scott Renne and Marri Kunik Renne 4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project 5. Just Compensation: $69,000.00 B. DATA 1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family 2. Zoning: R -2 3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost Land value determined by comparable sales. 4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied. 5. Market Approach: Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects neighborhood. Four sales were "arms - length" and one utilized an estate sale. The estate sales were in the proximity of the subject. Note should be made in the appraisal of the estate sale. Two sales utilized multi story structures rather than one story like the subject. This was done due to the age of the subject and lack of good older comparables. • C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made. All data appears to be representative of the market for the subject property. No Adjustments to the Renee's conclusions were necessary. All calculations and determinations were considered to be accurate and within applicable standards. Note should be made of the estate sale in the appraisal. D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with applicable standards. No different approaches to value were • deemed necessary. E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the value of $69,000 (Sixty Nine Thousand Dollars) recommended by Mr. & Mrs. Renne be considered the fair market value for December 9, 1996. • CERTIFICATION I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Gary W.Thom, on this 19th Day of December, 1996 and certify the following statements regarding this review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge: 1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with knowledge and without undue stimulus. 2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as comparable sales by the appraiser. 3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein. .4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been • performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements. 5.1 have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies and examines the appraisal report reviewed. Based upon my review of the above - listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of December 19, 1996, is recommended at $69,000.00 (Sixty Nine Thousand Dollars). SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi Review Appraiser Date Witness Date • J. Scott Renne, MAI • +; ;i; Real Estate Appraiser • Consultant • REALTOR �Q 2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 " (612) 871 -1417 • FAX (612) 871 -1481 PAGER (612) 661 -3256 December 15, 1996 Brad Hoffman Community Development Director City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 600 53rd Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary appraisal report Dear Mr. Hoffman: 'I Pursuant to your request, We have completed a market value appraisal report of the above referenced property. The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple • interest of the subject property as of December 9, 1996. The report is subject to the contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report. The term market value is defined as: The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self - interes4 and assuming that neither is under undue duress. The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report. The scope of the assignment included: Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on December 9, 1996. The owner accompanied the appraisers on the inspection. • Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale I L • - Highest and best use analysis Application of the appraisal P rocess A general description of legal data is: According to Hennepin County records the fee owner is Gary W. Thom - The PID is 01- 118 -21-43 -0075; The legal description is: That pan lying E of W 199.32 fee4 Lot 11, Block Z Bellvue Acres The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $813.04 plus specials of $10.44 for a total of $823.48 based on an estimated market value of Land $18,100; Building $37,900; Total $57,000 According to Hennepin County records the property has not sold within the past five years. Page 2 Reconciliation Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the subject property as of December 9, 1996 is: ........... ..... . . . . . . . . . . ...... ... ... ----------------- --------------- - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . I ' ISM Cost Approach $70,400 Sales Comparison Approach $68,000 Income Approach Not applied VALUE CONCLUSION $69,000 This conclusion is based upon my personal inspection and review of the subject property, comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process. Respectfully Submitted, J. Scott Renne, MAI, CA.E arn Renne, CAE Page 17 REVIEW APPRAISAL • A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION 1. Owner of Property: Elizabeth R. Diego 2. Location of Property: 5315 4th St. N., Brooklyn Center, Mn. 3. Appraiser(s): J. Scott Renne and Marri Kunik Renne 4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project 5. Just Compensation: $66,000.00 B. DATA 1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family 2. Zoning: R -2 3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost • Land value determined by comparable sales. 4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied. 5. Market Approach: Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects neighborhood. Two sales were "arms- length" and two sales utilized were estate sales and one sale was to government. All sales were in the proximity of the subject. Note was made of the estate sales and the government sale in the appraisal. • • C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made. All data appears to be representative of the market for the subject property. No Adjustments to the Renee's conclusions were necessary. All calculations and determinations were considered to be accurate and within applicable standards. D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with applicable standards. No different approaches to value were deemed necessary. • E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the value of $66,000 (Sixty Six Thousand Dollars) recommended by Mr. & Mrs. Renee be considered the fair market value for December 19, 1996. • • CERTICATION I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Elizabeth R. Diego, on this 31st Day of December, 1996 and certify the following'statements regarding this review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge: 1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with knowledge and without undue stimulus. 2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as comparable sales by the appraiser. 3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein. • 4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements. 5.1 have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies and examines the appraisal report reviewed. Based upon my review of the above - listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of December 31, 1996, is recommended at $66,000.00 (Sixty Six ThousandDollars). SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi Review A raiser .l PP l� � ,� ; Date Cert. General Real Prop. - l Witness Date i 1 J. Scott Renne, MAI Real Estate Appraiser • Consultant • REALTOR • „ 2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 i+ (612) 871 -1417 • FAX (612) 871 -1481 PAGER (612) 661 kZ December 29, 1996 Brad Hoffman i Community Development Director t City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway a Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 5315 4th Street North, Brooklyn Center (Diego property); Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary appraisal report I Dear Mr. Hoffman: Pursuant to your request, we have completed a market value appraisal report of the above referenced property. The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple interest of the subject property as of December 19, 1996. The report is subject to the contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report. The term market value is defined as: The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self- interes4 and assuming that neither is under undue duress. The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report. The scope of the assignment included: Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on December 19, 1996. The owner accompanied the appraisers on the inspection. ® - Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale ( • - Highest and best use analysis ` - Application of the appraisal process A general description of legal data is: According to Hennepin County records the fee owner is Elizabeth R. Diego. The PID is 01- 118 -21-43 -0068; The legal description is: North 112 front and rear of Lot 9, Block 2, Bellme Acres - The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $740.45 plus specials of $9.51 for a total of $749.96 based on an estimated market value of Land $18,200; Building $32,800; Total $51,000 - According to Hennepin County records the roe sold on August 15 P P riy � , 1996 for $62,500. It was listed on the MIS with a market time of 89 days. Page 2 Reconciliation • Based on the analysis ysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the subject property as of December 19, 1996 is: ,:v5 +v :; :.;: ...... ++ +2 v Mv: •.vv ,.:. 4h\: ?.v::}; \`i4xiti G< ?•:; i: ?i: •: :;• ti xj x�':;'?: .i.v'?� \• }: +:`::?;; ?:;x• }.4} ?.P,,•: :vn.,,v };:.v, •.3 .. .: .. ... .. 4.. .. :• 1:??:'•: v} v :.�.�,;.. ? ....................: .... :..n: \.. i + ;•1 ? : ?i \ ^ : . ; ,, ,., a v- .}x•'•} }, n +}. • 4`�'�• ,vT,vv 4 ? .. v.rh'�% ^�' - +X• +�A. ? •.•2. x ., S:SC.:vvy,4•::•., •.:vq. },..; .;: i;N ...; �:: .. } ; \ } }:.. + ••.5, } 'v'.• +•;, ?•.:. 4, a\,. :; \ }:ti} 22. h. h•;\4ti:. Jj•: itwtiY`•: •t•\ t•. , ��,gT ,* \ :}4 \.}i4 ::•ry.Nh. ,h .,..f. o.\:•,:: }44 „'A 5. ay. 'b,., 4,.: 4, a....... �}. •:4¢•:k;::•;}, 4; \agry: % ?: '� } } :�rriti;� }: };�: `:_ }::mss } +<�. •.,. \..::.:,.; :..X+ \... .y: K ,4 �.�..• >*4 \::; +'t+ . 4 5 i a4 � } „kc.:�:� + .+:• : }• • ,..:,:. . ;i: \.:.+^.} .,,\ t•. +",+ .xo. . \. `.�,F.; ' ++ ��S\, . :` i"w. +•,,, +x•. +•a , T`: }�?.,•.:..;ct • o ,, `,\.., .,k. •;.: }.....ax; , :.Z.. ,.s}R'f• }:' � ?: •.a: t, \• }.. .. \;, h , ♦ Gr. .h • }:v ?.. h5• 4i •.;.;};.;. ;. }.. ... 5 ec.+ 5 `ah .... �::.,. ., ? , ;1C- ti,.:t,4• }.... ,:.. .ha}na ..., 5......... "R• +•., h. ., \.\ i:.,`+g.¢•k. "�. },.. .., + `' •: .a5\ ... \:,.5 \:;: '•:.? cr: aF ?:`.`: }:. {;� } ? }. ?..;� } �3$•.;,•: �. :; .,. X :..» :. �.Tx; ; {., :}. .: �•5}.`2 ;4... 4 �`,x.;4 ..:,. }.. . :.5:. ........: ::::::::.::...,�: •,; .. ,.... .,.•:x -:::4� ..,..,rx. �. } + . .. : ,. • ..... ..:...,:. },.a.,::�atx+'ckR •t, •.;y,.;. 5:.: , ,�,1,.4.a•....,5\.'Y} -.: „ +:,•+••:. . ?: \: >r: ::`v. 5 \ v ..?v x•}:•} }:...;, .. :::^. ?... .. \'c}?C$: }'ii� }i:�' + v }5li • 5 : ; }\::i: :: k . - 5•:i *.. � +vS \+::t;t; ? i: 1 ::" "•iif� + .\+. +•:1:::a:4.,:..•x•. :..sv.i:,.. ..T..:.o}> .:... 4. + \� 5 ,t4 51++5:5 :•,• ` „ 44 -;1}. :i •iv, .� ..... , } 5 :.:.;� ;- ?,a4:5t..}ni r • : + fin • q1• ^,v T \+, t•• . \ .. .. .; ..; .... : .... i :. k +. V \ :: •}•:. ?, } +; 1 } }::G:::.;. ,�.;;;:}•} :.1 ? ` >: x: <:h .:, 2: +. , -. +\ •: :::.5+ :.,Jh .ts::'x :`,$, \ }' •• • .;�; • .4b. h'• 5 }.53x{}5- +,.j :.,. .h,,. }..,, th \ • \v:5•. h„ ,- .\}�:h`LO:L•.v ,.i�}?n ., 1C}:„..,.: L• +. ,>:,?1? .Y:S •:%1;:;1:::•`.• hw�:;::•., +:?., :,,�\ v...44�::. . h4:\ : ti 5+� h:iihl.} h. • ,a,,, ..,•... :. \:•: . .. , ,. \`xw 5@ • .,?kz. x: ' , y „•. , ., }p. .ti.:•:v. }}:1::::•: ? ? -:: •.v. v� ..v\`, .. \.h ..... v.,, .�:..iuU:::::.:: .x J.: ?•4h"vZC �. , ......... ,.;;? ;...; \..;, h'.•.:'- }} };h\ 1t 44 5•h �Y�3+`5`:;.'.'> ?�� �5 Cost Approach $70,800 Sales Comparison Approach $64,0 Income Approach Not applied VALUE CONCLUSION $661,000 This conclusion is based upon our personal inspection and review of the subject property, l ie comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process. Respectfully Submitted, aSC. J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE Marri K Renne, CAE 1 Page 17 REVIEW APPRAISAL A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION 1. Owner of Property: Timothy P. Olson 2. Location of Property: 516 53rd Ave. N., Brooklyn Center, Mn. 3. Appraiser(s): J. Scott Renne and Marri Kunik Renne 4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project 5. Just Compensation: $73,500.00 B. DATA 1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family 2. Zoning: R -2 3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost Land value determined by comparable sales. 4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied. 5. Market Approach : Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects neighborhood. Three sales were "arms- length" and two sales utilized were estate sales. All sales were in the proximity of the subject. Note was made of the estate sales in the appraisal. • • C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made. All data appears to be representative of the market for the subject property. No Adjustments to the Renee's conclusions were necessary. All calculations and determinations were considered to be accurate and within applicable standards. D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods judgements, and PP � J � conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with applicable standards. No different approaches to value were deemed necessary. • E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the value of $73,500 (Seventy Three Thousand Five Hundred Dollars) recommended by Mr. & Mrs. Renee be considered the fair market value for December 28, 1996. CERTIFICATION I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Timothy P. Olson, on this 31 st Day of December, 1996 and certify the following statements regarding this review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge: 1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with knowledge and without undue stimulus. 2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as comparable sales by the appraiser. 3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein. • 4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements. 5. I have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies and examines the appraisal report reviewed. Based upon my review of the above - listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of December 31, 1996, is recommended at $73,500.00 (Seventy Three Thousand Five Hundred Dollars). SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi Review Appraiser " VU Date j 3 Cert. General Real Prop. '4003156 Witness Date • J. Scott Renne, MAI , ..... Real Estate Appraiser • Consultant • REALTOR • 'dc4.M .;i 2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 h" (612) 871 -1417 FAX (612) 871 -1481 PAGER (612) 661 -3256 December 29, 1996 Brad Hoffman Community Development Director City of Brooklyn Center I 1 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 516 53rd Avenue North, Brooklyn Center (Olson property); Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary appraisal report Dear Mr. Hoffman: Pursuant to your request, I have completed a market value appraisal report of the above referenced property. The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple • interest of the subject property as of December 28, 1996. The report is subject to the contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report. The term market value is defined as: The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should C sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to I fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self- . ( interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress. The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal was a complete appraisal and the report a is summa appraisal report. re P tyP summary PP P The scope of the assignment included: Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on December 28, 1996. The owner accompanied the appraisers on the inspection. • - Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale - Highest and � best use analysis • - Application pp ation of the appraisal process A general description of legal data is: - According o Hennepin g p County records the fee owner is Timothy P. Olson. - The PID is 01- 118 -21 -43 -0069; The legal description is: Commencing at the SWC of Lot 10, thence East 74.65 fee4 thence My to a Point in North line of Lot 10 thence My 82.83 feet to the NWC of Lot 10, thence Sly to the Point of Beginning all in Lot 10, Block Z BeUvue Acres - The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $862.41 plus specials of $11.07 for a total of $873.48 based on an estimated market value of Land $18,100; Biu7ding $41,300; Total $59,400 According to Hennepin County records the property sold in April, 1994 for $61,000. i • Page 2 Reconciliation ® Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the , subject property as of December 28, 1996 is: :::::... .....::::::...v................ ...... .n :....n,+. \. v}: }' {'v }:• %ii }:• '•}4. }: v:v:: } } }� -v.v w: v.. v ......: ........... �x ...... ......:... •.}: JS:•: v+: ti:. w:.: nxv+ v}'{{ ::.}:{•SV.viL {.i'v }I. } w:::: .................. i }. �v. .}x' {: {2{•:},v.. v,''•.'''�'v C;. k} \... \}.$vi �.(: .,�+}•?C•.4 } \:. +.....i::• }:.•n:..n .�.. {.i: .0. , `6'.., ., ... •i:v .v::::::::, , •• - : : v'- ?::nY•;vti }: ::i' :..............: �:ry }• { } } }:• }:Ln v:::.vn•: n hP n ......... .?: }:: ..: }? nv.•nw: v J:{•}}: i4 :L:n.:i•i }:;C }:ii }i...nh }:n::.. ::::: ... a. v:}:.v}.:v.: x:nxx::. ........ ....: v: : .•:.:•• .... .. >.;.v . ., :} }:UG:J;Y \Y{8 ` �:ai�•: {'+ � v ,ti•, , A• 4 } .. •v.. n..,. .. .:: nv :: n•.y }w::;, v.... } :..:::. n........ ., v .... ....... : .:..................... ........... ... . \.::::: ::L {. .vv .,6v.• }; \... ..{..v:... .. v. '�` k.}, \.} :. �: :•:::::. v:} : { {•: { {n;:.:w:.v::• {;:.:v:.v: kv.v: } }:L:........ ... ...v.•r.:.}•:. :•:::.v;•;:: {•,v::. }::: ....; .. .v } :i v nv :\A'.ii•:J:.: \L•n \•:. `' v. v.. ,.ti:.. }v. J.•.v w::.,\.... ' p .v •. }'C4: ' v. 1 XT. i{ Shi':` < `{4;}ti {• v } :: } : : : <;i:':.; .... t .+.... .. 4.,+ v:: {.:}:ti:Yi ,t .v .. ................:.:}: 5:::::: w::;:• SSS:.........::. :. }:4 } } }S: ?::::• } } }}jii:2•h`•.. nvx;:' }:v. .. ...... :v...... } .. .::..v..v {.,..k n.; :; rv.. T. , ..... :.w:•v. .J: .{,..� .v •.v \ ^::::: n:• :: .::::.::::: w::::; •::::::::.:,•; •: 4 iv:: ^S:x {., • ., },.. \. ,4.v: +: ;{ :, +4•:.v w.v.h ••:2v.. :,v ... .n} :n24 ,}{ : `k, ,:v ++ +'> %.0...v . \ `4.:. •'S + (' •: }.::: .... •: }4..i:�.3. 'ii• : - .a.iv,3'v:...... L•,6 . .•. }v.�. v v \..v,v,,+::. .. ..... ... .. 3:.. ............. . n n:.: i' y i } ::> S%; h:.: :j { ; ::h:• $:::{} }:\.'•.��.::':;: i•: {:v:G }: n:. \v...: .. •nvv '• ii Cost Approach $74,500 Sales Comparison Approach $72,000 Income Approach Not applied VALUE CONCLUSION $73,500 This conclusion is based upon our personal inspection and review of the subject property, comparable sales, and application-of the appraisal process. i R . Respectfully Subm P y matted, J. Scott Renne MAI, CAE Mam Renne, CAE • Page 17 REVIEW APPRAISAL • A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION 1. Owner of Property: James A. Starkweather (Deceased) 2. Location of Property: 5306 Camden Ave. N., Brooklyn Center, Mn. 3. Appraiser(s): J. Scott Renne and Marri Kunik Renne 4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project 5. Just Compensation: $52,000.00 B. DATA 1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family 2. Zoning: R -2 �. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost • Land value determined by comparable sales. 4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied. 5. Market Approach : Standard method using four comparable sales in the subjects neighborhood. Three sales were "arms- length" and one sale utilized was an estate sale. All sales were in the proximity of the subject. Note should be made in the appraisal of the estate sale, sale ## 2. • • C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made. All data appears to be representative of the market for the subject property. No Adjustments to the Renee's conclusions were necessary. All calculations and determinations were considered to be accurate and within applicable standards. Note should be made of sale 42 being an estate sale in the appraisal. D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with applicable standards. No different approaches to value were deemed necessary. • E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the value of $2,000 (Fifty Two Thousand Dollars) recommended by Mr. & Mrs. Renne be considered the fair market value for December 21, 1996. • • CERTIFICATION I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by James A. Starkweather (Deceased), on this 31 st Day of December, 1996 and certify the following statements regarding this review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge: 1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with knowledge and without undue stimulus. 2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject roe and of all parcels used as P J property m' P comparable sales by the appraiser. P . _ PP 3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy p , of the property appraised and reviewed herein. 4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements. 5. I have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies and examines the appraisal report reviewed. Based upon my review of the above - listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of December 31, 1996, is recommended at $52,000.00 (Fifty Two Thousand Dollars). SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi - Review Appraiser Date Cert. General Real Prop. =4 03156 ® Witness Date J. Scott Renne, MM • _s j Real Estate Appraiser • Consultant • REALTOR N 2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH - MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 !y (612) 871 -1417 - FAX (612) 871 -1481 - PAGER (612) 661-3256 December 28, 1996 Brad Hoffman Community Development Director City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 5306 Camden Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, ( Starkweather property); Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary appraisal report Dear Mr. Hoffman: Pursuant to your request, We have completed a market value appraisal report of the above referenced property. The purpose of the appraisal is t v • p rp pp o arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee supple interest of the subject property as of December 21, 1996. The report is subject to the contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report. The term market value is defined as: The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self - interes4 and assuming that neither is under undue duress. The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal was a complete appraisal and the report a is summa appraisal P PP P type IY PP report. P The scope of the assignment gnment included: Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on December 21, 1996. It was reported that the owner, James Sarkweather is deceased. The tenant, Anna Starkweather (James' sister in law), accompanied the appraisers on the inspection. - Surve • y and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale - Highest and best use analysis Application of the appraisal process A general description of legal data is: - According to Hennepin County records the fee owner is James A. Starkweather - The PID is 01- 118 -21-43 -0077; The legal description is: That part lying S of N 62 fee4 Lot 1Z Block Z Bellvue Acres The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $920.50 plus specials of $11.82 for a total of $932.32 based on an estimated market value of Land $18,800; Building $44,600; Total $63,400. According to Hennepin County records the property has not sold within the past five years. a l Page 2 Reconciliation Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the subject property as of December 21, 1996 is: .v:.: . v:,.}`::; t : v';:'.} '4i:Si:{. } }'4:v.v:::.v::::::... v:v }:::::::... .. . r... v .... ..........h:v....:::h,....... :: v.y.}..: •.v::.,:• .....t }: '+ ' 4 :..{: \:.. ..:.; {i., ........... ......:::: ................ 4.:\. h•::: v ......4......h:?.: ...$ } ih .{5:;�•}ti ?ti' �':: •: ?• }}iii ..Y,:v. •: 4}';. } }i'n ^::.:;::::::.:? } }ti. •nt }'-ti'. }'v }':: }..v.. :. m . ...... ..........:v}: {. :.............. vw; ........ . .......:..,v:;: }Y {•}::nvhv: ^{:•:,v' \:•: ?: >.q; >.n.. \:..t4: }:.w: .: •hv ... :: •:.. \: .:v: \i::$ }::.:: {.y:: w............ n.... ., • },: +:�.v .. hC. L{::. nt•. :{ } :'� , ;•}it +;'v:;:;. v.... hY.. v ?w; } } }:;{v:h' :St %?n •S.'�: •: ::...; r...w......,. : ,. :. :;.: ....\v t •.. .•�y .... ..:. .... :.:; :w::::::::.v. ,.., {.}•.v: ti:.4.v: {.;;: {:., :. `•.v.. +...v... ....: v.. .. ...;:4:.4:v:.4 \v:: v:v::::..- ..t., :. » Q!•�:,v ... ,: t.... t 2. � .... tv ..:.:�:..}...n......,:c'• } } }: {: {:.},; ;.•:y:;: ..:..... \• + w •: •.vh•.4::wi,v.}hv Mv. : h. .v':.0.\r..4r.. .. .. + ' • ^ v v 4.:4 v'�, vr. :.,::::::::.v::.v:::::. •.:;w:.yvv: ? }. }' } } } } }::14':v.v; ....v. •v: :..... 4 .:. .: >rn; ::::: ": } }}:4 n} " ^ }i :..........: ..v..............., .::. hY.... +. h.?C 4.. . •�::4' .?, ........w: ::•n•..v; }:.,• ,....:.: } {.y } }:4:': '4..... w.:}}n: .:. ti• : :.:.....:.. : . ......... t. •.{•.n... 7:C't .::. ':{....:v �; �: >. . vi:J'v } }:..:.:: n � .:4.. h......: h.. ». }T t •. •\ • .l: i \t n ' .:..: i.:} ... tn ' { ...••• t.:. Wit, ..... v : v::. v: •} }:n } }} }};. :: {::• }:G.'C;4:.... tx- k4:iS::.v;:: {•,; i; i:::v:, } i;: ...vv: n.�h...:::.w..• .h..: ...v, ...?v.. �alne.Co sj . ...,...:.:: t ._ t, t. ;° :•� � d4E�t }::::::.:;� ? }• }•::::: }:::.: <. }::;. },.i :.: ;...........hw ... .. i••ti:; }i}:4 } ' ?•:4i, ...:.. . �..:::: vy4...;. v{::: n}} i}:: w•. v } :: :: :.��::::k:i }. }.' { >': }i {:......: •.v ............... ....: ... ......n.... ,..t.:. ........ .. x}. :. Y S•..?:t.. . }:. }.;. v : : } -:: 4};•::..,...: •.v: .v.. t... v. .�• t, n• itv. 4:.;: 4};•;:}:;,:}....,.:. vT::: n..., ..., ............:.:,- .,.t::. -: •:....`.,•.�:...; ., ,.... "r .v.. .... .. :.. . .::;:?.::.} :: ........... n.::: v4}:•};:::•:;{ v: v:;}:: h.: v; v}:•; p}}\-. v: w..... h. h.:: v•. tt. ...w....:...:................., ..... ..........., .. :... .. .. \.. .: .. , .v{i :'\ 'J.- .' ::UV}..:. .. h... ,..5.:•.v�ttK.v}::, { v, \.'Q�� -.v .. t�S {. 'i., . : }: ` . .: n..:.:... ;v.:v. •:.:vv +} {:: }.+v.t,•.v:i:: w.::•:: w:: hv;:.nv:.w:::: •. 4f.•.w-v::.v: vv:::v::...... ,..... t. ;....... Ohw h.: t...... , : � ...,H }':.y ....v:•:.. .: }} }$:•:. ?:?T.,{;. •.x ....:.:::.... ...,...v:: »••v :•v: h..,...w. e..,..:..... ...... :.w v.:. v.: ;. ... ,v ..4 Vxh r. n ..t.t•., ?.;: ;: {{::::. ..::r :. ;}::• } }: {•::.:::i'ii ?:4 ;• ?:• } }:v. "...t... }. vv::: ::: rv.. ..; }}:: :.. '}'l•.v ..h:..5a.. .4.., 4w:w„{ n .: ....... ....... v:•. vx.:::.,::: w•.::: ;- } } }}:4:{4 } } }:•:v::.:,'•.:4\w: }:•: � } }i: t,.. ..'�..... •: •' . . } }.'•}: +. {..�v Cost Approach $49,200 " Sales Comparison Approach P PP $52,000 Income Approach Not applied VALUE CONCLUSION $52,000 This conclusion is based upon my personal inspection and review of the subj sect property, comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process. qM • Respectfully Submitted, J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE Mam K Renne, CAE • Page 17 REVIEW APPRAISAL A. APPRAISAL AL IDEi TIFICATION 1. Owner of Property: Michael R. And Virginia L. Mahigan ?. Location of Property: 814 53rd Ave. Ni., Brooklyn Center, Mn. 3. Appraiser(s): J. Scott Renne and Marri Kunik Renne 4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project 5. Just Compensation: $64,500.00 B. DATA 1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family 2. Zoning: R -2 3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost Land value determined by comparable sales. 4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied. 5. tilarket Approach : Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects neighborhood. Two sales were "arms - length" and two sales utilized were estate sales and one sale was a sale to government.. All sales were in the proximity of the subject. Note was made in the appraisal of the estate sales and the government sale. • • C • ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made. All data appears to be representative of the market for the subject property. No Adjustments to the Renee's conclusions were necessary. All calculations and determinations were considered to be accurate and within applicable standards. D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with applicable standards. No different approaches to value were deemed necessary. E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the value of $64,500 (Sixty Four Thousand Five Hundred Dollars) recommended by Mr. & virs. Renne be considered the fair market value for December 21, 1996. • • CERTIFICATION I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Michael R. And Virginia L. Mahican, on this 30th Day of December, 1996 and certify the following statements regarding this review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge: 1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with knowledge and without undue stimulus. 2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as comparable sales by the appraiser. 3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein. • 4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements. 5. I have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies and examines the appraisal report reviewed. Based upon my review of the above - listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of December 30, 1996, is recommended at $64,500.00 (Sixty Four Thousand Five Hundred Dollars). SIGNED: Joseph J.Da.Bruzzi Review ,appraiser f Date � Cert. General Real Prop.0031�6 Witness Date • { J. Scott Renne, MM �? ?� Real Estate Appraiser • Consultant • REALTOR • 2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS408 1 r (612) 871 -1417 FAX (612) 871 -1481 - PAGER (612) 661 -3256 +r i December 26, 1996 Brad Hoffman Community Development Director City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 A Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 814 53rd Avenue North, Brooklyn Center (Mahigan property); Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary appraisal report Dear Mr. Hoffman: Pursuant to your request, I have completed a market value appraisal report of the above referenced property. The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple interest of the subject property as of December 21, 1996. The report is subject to the contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report. The term market value is defined as: The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified propeny rights should f; sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self- 'f interes4 and assuming that neither is under undue duress. The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal was a complete appraisal and the report type -is summary appraisal report. The scope of the assignment included: Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on December 21, 1996. The owner accompanied the appraisers on the inspection. • - Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale - Highest and best use analysis - Application of the appraisal process A general description of legal data is: - According o Hennepin County records the fee owner g p ty r is Michael R. Mahigan, et al. - The PID is 01- 118 -21- 34-0031• The legal description g is. West 50 feet of East 200 feet of Lot 11, Block 3, Bellvue Acres - The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $730.28 plus specials of $9.38 for a total of $739.66 based on an estimated market value of Land $16,200; Building $34,100; Total $50,300 - According to Hennepin County records the property has not sold in the past three years. t Page 2 Reconciliation • Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the subject property as of December 21, 1996 is: :. >. {.;., •:.,•n n. ....4...: - ,J.v. •h } {• h'b'•',{i •: v��S -' a,�v 4 \ ::: ...... ..... :::::.v...... t .... n.v ti::::: ?: �:::• vi • ....L`N.:. ,. 44 .... :. : .v......... .vi�h'2•: �,•.. .,:?hY" nhu)•. +; v?:ti ;S:::t : :. {. }• {::::::. ?i:.•x. ... ...,...:. n.. , n� • -t .}n:::x :} l•:v: }.... r....... -:?}} i};::. v:::::::.: v: v::::: :::n:•:::.:w.:::.vv.:.w.n.,..., n,:.v::. Y;•i ? ?:v}:;v, :. .... ,. .::.v .; .; .; ... .,. h,.. \,.., wv. .:h..... ... ., .. h... .. .... n':�. ::::..: ,.. ......... n ................ n:::rw.... ,.. ........... ........:.. ,+ :•.SV4 •YY•} . •hv: ^:• }} }}•.}:• ? } ?:•:i•`.Y:j .vx::.;v....... -: i•}:•:::.; v:• ii:; j'}?i:• 1: :.,.::::.v:.; }: {::: ?: ?:::::: }.v::; %t:.}:v.. h{A: {,:,,• ?:.::. �::: r . .............................:. v?........ ..:. \...:\ ., -a .:..... {... v;: : %.... • } ? }:.,�: . : - }.. h Y,. ��,.,..x:• }: Y.;:.,,w::: ?: .................. .......w.v: ?.i:• };.`.. ? ?:;::::: ny :4;: {..::: x ; +. } ?;:,; :..:: -. ...{...�,,..n•- v::.vh.., .,.. :::::.w:...�,.........., :,.,,,... ...:...... ,.::: • :::•.•... v. W:. ..;. t. •:..... h:. ;.'.w.,w::. • i�2ti> •.v}fv. v...: }:Y� {: }a } ? ?::v. +vn:•i{{ ... ..n ............... v.:.... :,.n n.. •;:ry`.:Y •::a'. "�',.:... Cost Approach $65,000 Sales Comparison Approach $64,000 Income Approach Not applied VALUE CONCLUSION $64,S00 This conclusion is based upon our personal inspection and review of the subject property, comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process. Respectfully Submitted, J. Scott Renne, NW, CAE Marri K. Renne, CAE Page 17 REVIEW APPRAISAL • A. APPRAISAL RA SAL IDENTIFICATION 1. Owner of Property: Ronald J. And Beth R. Sandberg 2. Location-of Property: 702 53rd Ave. N., Brooklyn Center, Mn. 3. Appraiser(s): J. Scott Renne and Marri Kunik Renne 4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project 5. Just Compensation: $64,000.00 B. DATA 1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family 2. Zoning: R -2 �. Cost.Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost Land value determined by comparable sales. 4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied. 5. 1\4arket Approach : Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects neighborhood. Two sales were "arms- length" and two sales utilized were estate sales and one sale was a sale to government.. All sales were in the pro:(=* *ty of the subject. Note was made in the appraisal of the estate sales and the government sale. • • C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made. All data appears to be representative of the market for the subject property. No Adjustments to the Renee's conclusions were necessary. All calculations and determinations were considered to be accurate and within applicable standards. D. ANALYSIS OF V Q ACIDITY: All of the appraiser's s methods judgments, and PP � J conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with applicable standards. No different approaches to value were deemed necessary. E. RECONLMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the value of $64,000 (Sixty Four Thoussand Dollars) recommended by Mr. & Mrs. Renne be considered the fair market value for December 21, 1996. • CERTIE A LION I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Ronald J. And Beth R. Sandberg, on this 30th Day of December, 1996 and certify the following statements regarding this review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge: • 1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with knowledge and without undue stimulus. 2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as comparable sales by the appraiser. 3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein. 4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements. 5. I have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies • and examines the appraisal report reviewed. Based upon my review of the above - listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixtttre appraisal) as of December 30, 1996, is recommended at $64,000.00 (Sixty Four Thousand Dollars). SIGINED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi Review Appraiser Date 1Z' l� Cent. General Real Prop. # 40 316 Witness Date • J. Scoff Renne, MAI •�?j Real Estate Appraiser • Consultant • REALTOR ' 3 2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55408 a 4 h (612) 871 -1417 FAX (612) 871 -1481 PAGER 1612) 661 -3256 December 26, 1996 Brad Hoffman Community Development Director City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 702 53rd Avenue North, Brooklyn Center; Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary appraisal report Dear Mr. Hoffman: Pursua an to 0 y ur request, I have completed a market value ap rep ort re ort of the above referenced property. The u ose of the appraisal sisal is t rP pp o arrive at an estimate of market value alue of the fee simple P • interest of the subject property as of December 21, 1996. The report is subject to the contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report. The term market value is defined as: The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self - interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress. The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report. The scope of the assignment included: Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on December 21, 1996. The owner accompanied the appraisers on the inspection. • - Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale • - Highest and best use analysis - Application of the appraisal process A general description of legal data is: - According to Hennepin County records the fee owner is Ronald J. and Beth R. Sandberg The PID is 01- 118 -21 -34 -0025; The legal description is: East 49.62 feet of Lot 10, Block 3, Bellvue Acres - The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $740.45 plus specials of $9.51 for a total of $749.96 based on an estimated market value of Land $15,200; Building $35,800; Total $51,000 According to Hennepin County records the property has not sold in the past three years. • • Page 2 Reconciliation Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the subject property as of December 21, 1996 is: :::.::'.,�.:::::.,, J.. J.`v'•.�. vii:, ^'::: A}:..v:'v: w::'; •.::: .:'...::: i': ......v.•, hw:; }:vh• }:;•.:: i'! }:! .... .....5}�;. ti.. .... .•� \iiS } ' : \i::: ``,...-0:..h '•,,. f:. `r .,.. ::\ �:;•!i: •! } ?:..,v, :•! }}\;^v.} ... .;i;•ti;; ^riS:S \v�;;:Y: .fi : ..n...... •t,`.�! ... h,. vY ... .. •} }::•:r::., •h�: }.vv}hi,J.;J}:; ;:: } }' }. ; •'YK; •:tih w::::; •: ..:�.. .. � v.Yv \'^? ::;....: ,'5::::r. ;.:{... .T,.. n4r:. ti";h:ti; :, }:;'•: .. h......., v}} JL- j••:i ?•i:'.4:•i ?:•:;;;.: {; >.•ti ki�:•:Li:.. - �JY;n!i: >.'` '; . ., t wM.. ;;; { r:i•.J} }:.., x.h . - :: \ }.; w.v.;v: •: ,.w:: .. h. h v h t •` -!. •..'}'..h ::'•Y•'- ?•- :;;• •.i•�::'�;, ;;'if:. r:r ;• } :v'•`: } -:L::: xt } ?! :::: ........... vn......h;;•:;•!::.:....., ...,;.. ,• .�.. x YCJP \:v } }: .. h }h. :ti .. h..Y •} ..;. v:: v: ;;. }!i:J:- .xv :•. }.v,v. }:• }` ?:v: v::::S ::., :•. .......:... :.... n.......� .. $::!.. ....:. h .,..1.... }h;:•'..{..:9 ..},..i....... }A•. n v ::.: ;ii:; ;. }!i ?? ?ii:;;; { \ }:, }.Sr. : ?:w; .: ::. } } }S:. },;.,..: ::::: ..,. :.: %�J,?: it- v.vv ,\;\�}.:v .. ...:. ..::: i:•v: : ... .. . \, ... :,...... n.. �n ,:..•: .,, Y4vv h:v:: ;,::?v .., ......,; ..::} 51�.•�. n\ ; \},,. :.. \i :n .J.h••.4 :: •• \x:. \4 ; v •..: { ?:x;n , .i�- ..; ` , } :!.. h ,, .: :•::: n:}. i}!\.}}':: ii:, �,",'• 5 .,• �. ti'{ vv \ % } }ki.' } :: } ti }.,:- i .. i ��,+�. ;.;. .:.,.. ::... .. .... .... ...: •. .. \'v.. ..`}...: M1. �ti}v` n4}�+,..:: �•:;:;:�.•. }:� -: • i.JiT:� • ?�F,.�;� • .ti: .v. Y } � Y+A x,h4. ', } i.•}% Q ;'.:i•:'�•2��} %, ;•:yC ?' {i"1•.`• J� ,•{ .. Sa. v .n;M.. . h.. : •: }rhv:.x }Y!A. , wh : �4.iri {} 9 .• !�:j•?, }`'YS• }:'•.v.:. {.i �;.}:.: }:v� }4 {;.!:': •:: w:: , h�:•. : .. ` \ Y 5.::+ }}: •.:.,.... :..} .:: `: i4•.t .. }n Y. •y ? 4 �• �:<, jv ? +,) \xh: \}}•Jyn }; } }y. •.v..,iv ..2• }'••: ::. t? f.:\: 5:;\ '•v } ? ?:: ^:: ? <iJ:ir ?� ?:'•:v+ •.v \;}}.:i. : ... .::. + •'C•:v: `.:k } ,,�c� ;.1�;. };.• }2 ?:;: i ?�:�: .}\.\•: �Y' �6•.i•.,., w:.•::.,,.}}::. ,.. }�:,,,....:'•.:J.,v!V; } :',,: ..:,:. {: ,.:. •.,., :;,fi ,,,,,x •.':� : n?; :S! "J!!!:i•iti• }:,.,, ?vnv::.;;L: �.:•'• "�T Cost Approach $64,800 Sales Comparison Approach $63,000 Income Approach Not applied VALUE CONCLUSION $64 This conclusion is based upon our personal inspection and review of the subject property, comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process. • Respectfully Submitted, J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE Marri K. Renne, CAE • Page 16 REVIEW APPRAISAL • A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION 1. Owner of Property: Joseph C. Kobiltz, et al. W/L Estate 2. Location of Property: 5;13 Camden Ave. N., Brooklyn Center, Mn. �. Appraiser(s): J. Scott Renne and Mam Kutuk Renne 4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project 5. Just Compensation: $73,500.00 B. DATA 1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family 2. Zoning: R -2 3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost Land value determined by comparable sales. P • 4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied. 5. Market Approach: Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects neighborhood. Three sales were "arms- length" and two sales utilized were estate sales. The estate sales were in the . proximity of the subject. Note was made in the appraisal of the estate sales. • C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made. • All data appears to be representative of the market for the subject property. No Adjustments to the Renee's conclusions were necessary. All calculations and determinations were considered to be accurate and within applicable standards. D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with applicable standards. No different approaches to value were PP PP deemed necessary. • E. RECOiv24ENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the value of $78,500 (Seventy Eight Thousand Five Hundred Dollars) recommended by Mr. & Mrs. Renne be considered the fair market value for December 9, 1996. • CERTIFICATION • I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Joseph C. Kobiltz, on this 30th Day of December,1996 and certify the following statements regarding this review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge: 1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the roe will bring in a competitive P P rtY market under 1 conditions al itions re u' ' isrte to a fair e q air sal ,which would g result from ne between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with knowled and ' v�nthout undue stimulus. 2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as comparable sales by the appraiser. i 3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein. 4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements. P P • 5. I have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property property and the i to be acquired therein, identifies the P by name of owner , parcel number or other identification, establishe s just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies and examines the appraisal report reviewed. Based upon my review of the above - listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of December 30, 1996, is recommended at $78,500.00 (Seventy Eight Thousand Five Hundred Dollars). SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi Review Appraiser � / Z_h p G„ L Witness Date • J. Scott Renne, MAI • 't:� Real Estate .appraiser • Consultant -REALTOR aa a I.7 2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 (612) 871-1417 • FAX (612) 871 -1481 • PAGER 1612) 661-3256 December 15, 1996 Brad Hoffman Community Development Director City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 5318 Camden Avenue North, Brooklyn Center; Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary appraisal report Dear Mr. Hoffman: Pursuant to your request, I have completed a market value appraisal report of the above referenced property. The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple • interest of the subject property as of December 9, 1996. The report is subject to the contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report. The term market value is defined as: The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self - interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress. II I The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report. The scope of the assignment included: Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on December 9, 1996. The tenants accompanied arced the appraisers P pp rs on the inspection. The owner lives in New Jersey nd Y gave the appraisers permission to view the • property - Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings • - P g for sale Highest and best use analysis Application of the appraisal process A general description of legal data is: - According to Hennepin County records the fee owner is J. C. Koblitz, et al. W/L Estate - The PID is 01- 118 -21-43 -0076; The legal description is: North 62 feet of Lot 1Z Block Z Bellvue Acres The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $2,193.78 plus specials of $12.84 for a total of $2,206.62 based on an estimated market value of Land $19,000; Building $49,900; Total $68,900 - According to Hennepin County records the property has not sold in the past five years. • • Page 2 Reconciliation Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the subject property as of December 9, 1996 is: ::.. V• ......::....... . {............. }:..... ..}::;::::.:.}} : v ;'..,........ ......, .. T... v ... 8 •: ?:'J:v�....,. t: w: - t'�5 \Yn %3: ..: h: •:: T: is } }: }.:: : •i\ 1 :: +: ::: ••:.,:: :•- ;:.::: .:..}.. .:.: -•:::: .....,•::::: •..: ......, v..:,v: h.. : ..}; : ....... } }: h,....v. ?.v;: .... }.h .. ... ........ .........TK•'- : ;•;: + <.}; t;t;••n >::;:' .Y c + .. . ,. 4 ... v}+"• .. : }.};. }: }1�;. }.: TT::.v •.:{vT: •nvT: TT:.v:•; v.v�.�•v:.v: •.v v.::: .::: Anv.v ::.'^:::.v: A•h•.v: >... :. �.}:.,.. :,.}.q.:t;Si �E:T' :i: l,S•vv�;;�v: T: ••`.•ii•.}}vvv.t• k- '.;v:, \ yh:v: ht'•:;•: v \•T:{;;;5; . :::. •, ..:h :: \., +, ^.v n. : .. : , T..,. ,r ..vh::..... ri..•}i: ?; •:v`' ;• ti. •.vT.v v:h: .. 2... ...:..�:::..hh:.,:.Th�+.7�:...• •:•T. \... .tk}xTV >;TT; . \.., •..,; }..: }•? ; .4�:0 "' .. - ::: :�;. : s s•E.:�......,. xi`2..1.. .:. %vT }:• } ;; }!�.. .. h•.,.:: \• }:::. .:h... M:a \.. . \... ,T. T. •v,'i.;.:.:Txft:•' }i'.ttx� •'�`.�•�. , ,i•:.. \`:•:ti;:. M•:: T: v} ?•v.:...n :::.......... +: :4}}... : }v': .. T. } n�...1.:: Vvv.. ; ?•1�., {.} .T% ::E$ti: : +...,....:.:.�:: •:: k:.,...::.,•::::::::::.: ... . ;.;:• T;�t•.: : :. V}.:;.��,;:. } }:t :�:. },.,. t, j>E:;':T:. ar•'�' hk ,:t•., .}:. ,•:.:t; };�:::�. -.:+ -: T:T <• ?:.........:::;.T. ?::•T ::`•:'•`. a::::::;:;• :;•........:..,,..,............ '.: :�: .. .... v ; ...., .� :::........::.:........ . ?�••.:..: } .w•};c2;h u, �y,,� �*•µ,''r"•.- ..Z,`;T::� »::.:, -: :t•:tv; t VC.v ••.:,:v; •.vh:.: n:::::::: T4•Tn . r';T:i;:•:S '. .:.,.. v .......w:.w• •,vv: ... ' is :: n\ :L; ..........:...� x }:t{• } }' :�.tv+: t :' {• :- :$•:'., •. k.. , •:.tw•;; ,, .......•T;J:ti:+.:.h ::• ::::. :.::::::::: ?:: .. :: Th`•::: v :w v. Vv .}.::. .,. vv..:x •:::4Tv:.: ^T. v??r: %••::. }t } v v:: ; ; .Y - � •.•ht: t.• }:::: -• .; w. v: vt v}?%: n,:: n} f x t•:T?i: hT: t• ?'::n::vvv: }.vT!:••.:w:::.vn,w; v,vvv •:?: •.:v:::n .. ... .. .v.. , ......... ..... ... .. ...... .. n. ....... , ........ ...N .... .... }.h•;,,;:• } }: }: ;.:::; ;:: � ::.....::.............:. T.. v..n ..... .:.,. \ ,.. x..,, .. h.:v::•...nn......v.:.:v:; ;............:; ,.. ....,... .:v ?.'4::;:•:SJ};:;• } }} .:.:::::.:... , w.} i.+. v::., vv }i: ?' ?Y4 }:::: ..,...v,.v... v....v.A,v,w:- ............::.. ;...::.:. h. vv•: y. >,.,. ��: . %:•: .'S w:T :s•: ...................:;:.}:':::.:%; .:.;.::. >..i ?;. +, ?i:: ?"r?:Tt :i: \•.:v •... w............: hv:::.: �:::...- n. n...... v. v.::•.:::::, v,•, v;..... ......:.:.v::n:::.....hv.x...:: i ...P... {.ST•: ; }'.. �,•::. f...,. } Cost Approach $79 Sales Comparison Approach $77 Income Approach Not applied VALUE CONCLUSION $78 This conclusion is based upon our personal inspection and review of the subject property, comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process, Respectfully Submitted, J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE M Renne, CAE • Page 17 REVIEW APPRAISAL • A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION 1. Owner of Property: Delorys D. Bakeberg 2. Location of Property: 5306 4th Street N., Brooklyn Center, Mn. 3. Appraiser(s): J. Scott Renne and Marri Kunik Renne 4. Project: 63rd Avenue Project 5. Just Compensation: $67,500.00 B. DATA 1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family 2. Zoning: R -2 3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost • Land value determined by comparable sales. 4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied. 5. Market Approach: Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects neighborhood. Three sales were "arms- length" and two sales utilized were estate sales. All sales were in the proximity of the subject. Note was made in the appraisal of the estate sales. • • C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made. All data appears to be representative of the market for the subject property. No Adjustments to the Renee's conclusions were necessary. All calculations and determinations were considered to be accurate and within applicable standards. D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with applicable standards. No different approaches to value were deemed necessary. • E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the value of $67,500 (Sixty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars) recommended by Mr. & Mrs. Renee be considered the fair market value for December 28, 1996. • CERTIFICATION • I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the propertm- owned by Delorys D Bakeberg, on this 2nd Day of January, 1997 and certify the following statements regarding this review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge: 1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting rudentl with P Y= knowledge and without undue stimulus. 2. 1 have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as comparable sales by the appraiser. 3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein. 4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements. • 5. I have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies and examines the appraisal report reviewed. Based upon my review of the above - listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of January 2 1997, is recommended at $67,500.00 (Sixty SevenThousand Five Hundred Dollars). SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi Review Appraiser G= '`��'� Date Cert. General Real Prop. 003156 Witness Date • J. Scott Renne, NIM • asrri!f. Real Estate Appraiser - Consultant • REALTOR 2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 ., (612) 871 -1417 - FAX 1612) 871-1481 • PAGER (612) 661 -3256 December 29, 1996 Brad Hoffman Community Development Director City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 5305 4th Street North, Brooklyn Center (Bakeberg property); Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary appraisal report Dear Mr. Hoffman: Pursuant to your request, we have completed a market value appraisal report of the above referenced property. The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple interest of the subject property as of December 28, 1996. The report is subject to the • contingent and limiting onditions and certification stated ' the report. ( g m 1 The term market value is defined as: The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self - interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress. The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report. The scope of the assignment included: Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on December 28, 1996. The owner accompanied the appraisers on the inspection. • - Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale - Highest and best g use analysis • - Application of the appraisal ppraisal process A general description of legal data is: - According o Hennepin nnepin County records the fee owner is Delorys Bakeberg. - The PID is 01- 118 -21-43 -0071; The legal description is: Commencing at the NEC of Lot 10, thence Sly along Ely line of said Lot 55 fee4 thence West 128.3 fee4 thence north along the West line 53 (MOL) feet thence east 113.42 feet to point of beginning all in Lot 10, Block Z Bellvue Acres The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $826.11 plus specials of $10.61 for a total of $836.72 based on an estimated market value of Land $16,600; Building $40,300; Total $56,900 - According to Hennepin County records the property sold in September, 1994 for $57,800. 1 Page 2 Reconciliation • Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the subject property as of December 28, 1996 is: W!.e ----- -- . .... i � XX.: Cost Approach $68,600 Sales Comparison Approach $67,000 Income Approach Not applied VALUE CONCLUSION $67,500 This conclusion is based upon our personal inspection and review of the subject property, comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process. Respectfully Submitted, J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE Marri K Renne, CAE • Page 17 REVIEW APPRAISAL • A. APPRAISAL N S L IDEi TIFICATION 1. Owner of Property: Irma M. Ruone 2. Location of Property: 722 63rd Ave. N., Brooklyn Center, Nin. 3. Appraiser(s): J. Scott Renne and Marri Kunik Renne 4. Project: 63rd Avenue Project 6. Just Compensation: $67,000.00 B. DATA 1. Hiahest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family 2. Zoning: R -2 3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost Land value determined by comparable sales. • 4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied. 5. Market Approach: Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects neighborhood. Three sales were "arms - length ", two sales utilized were estate sales. All sales were in the proximity of the subject. Note was made in the appraisal of the estate sales. • • C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made. All data appears to be representative of the market for the subject property. No adjustments to the Renee's conclusions were necessary. All calculations and determinations were considered to be accurate and within applicable standards. D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with applicable standards. No different approaches to value were deemed necessary. • E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the value of $67,000 (Sixty Seven Thousand Dollars) recommended by Mr. & Mrs. Renee be considered the fair market value for December 28, 1996. • CERTIFICATION I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Irma M. Ruone, on this 8th Day of January, 1997 and certify the following statements regarding this review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge: 1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with knowledge and without undue stimulus. 2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as comparable sales by the appraiser. 3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein. 4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements. 5. I have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the • interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies and examines the appraisal report reviewed. Based upon my review of the above- listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of January 8, 1997, is recommended at $67,000.00 (Sixty Seven Thousand Dollars). SIGNED: Joseph J. DaB=i //, Review Appraiser \ o zz > %`\ '�, J �; Date �� /' , Cj Cert. General Real Prop. =40031 56 Witness Date J. Scott Renne, MAI • h M! Real Estate Appraiser • Consultant • REALTOR •a 2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA SS408 )` (612) 871 - I417 •FAX (612) 8 7 1 - 1481 PAGER (612) 661 -3256 December 31, 1996 Brad Hoffman Community Development Director City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 722 53rd Avenue North, Brooklyn Center (Ruone property); Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary appraisal report Dear Mr. Hoffman: Pursuant to your request, I have completed a market value appraisal report of the above referenced property. The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple h f t inerest o the subject property as of December 28 report is subject to the bj I� P rtY , 1996. The re • P i contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report. The term market value is defined as: The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self - interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress. The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report. The scope of the assignment included: Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on December 28, 1996. The owner, her son and daughter accompanied the appraisers on the inspection. • - Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale - Highest and best use analysis - Application of the appraisal process A general description of legal data is: - According to Hennepin Coup records the fee owner is County Irma M. Ruone, et al. - The PID is 01- 118 -21- 340026• The e 1 gal description is: West 50 feet of Lot 10 and South 112 of West 50 feet of Lot 9, Block 3, Bellvue Acres - The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $776.75 plus specials of $9.97 for a total of $786.72 based on an estimated market value of Land $16,900; Building $36,600; Total $53,500 f According to Hennepin County records the property has not sold in the past three years. • Page 2 Reconciliation • Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate a mar y of th rk t for the subject property as of December 28, 1996 is: ........::::.v •: - :.......::::.: }}:n;? }} i}: 7} 7::.::: i} n\\ ..:,.:...............:::::.�::. �:.v :vi \:ii'r }i } i:; } ?Y :.: : ::..:w :v: w.v:....... ....{..... .... (� .. . ♦ ::: .........::T:r4; {• } }ii: {vv:::;: }:•}:•}}: ? ? ?�ii:4:J }: r.:.v:•: •.....:.v.:.v.v:.. ....... 'p,'•: C o ... p:. .iiiv }:'nw::: :::v: x:::::::: •:::.:v,•.y: :•:.,:v:::;:v : +•::: ::•.. w:< ;• } %::> }:? ?. }vx:. \•`i :.:?' ?• } }: .all�...fi0 Q n.4 : ti:`v:: ?:�:� }:iii :i. \ ::•. •iii } } :::.:::::::::::::::::::.� :.. v:. tC' �i?:}`:'{ i:::*: jyii:::?:::•`.:; sji' r' rt:?}:::.`: i•!:L:\•::::;'.:::} ? ?;. > ?Ct?•?: .........v._:;:::.v: ;nv...... • .::::::::::::: ::::::.: n. :........:: n.;:.�:::..::. :::.:::::. � :::............:.:::.....:..... ...:.....?}iii ?:� ., .. ;......:.. . .:::::..:. �:::::::..:: � ::........::::.:::::::: w::+:::. v.•. w: x: n:•::::}::.?.:;?;.: ivn: p}}: U .:•: }::i: ?q�v'4:W: ?:r.: }:i.: -:: ::..::::.,.::::::: ...:,.;::::: •... �..v::: vh... :..... Cost Approach $67,300 Sales Comparison p n Approach $66,500 Income Approach Not applied VALUE CONCLUSION $67,000 This conclusion is based upon our personal inspection and review of the subject property, comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process. • Respectfully Submitted, Al J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE Mam Rennie, CAE • Page 17 Commissioner introduced the following resolution and • moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION, ESTABLISHING OFFER OF JUST COMPENSATION, AUTHORIZING NEGOTIATION AND EXECUTION OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT, AUTHORIZING PAYMENT FOR ACQUISITION, CLOSING COSTS AND RELOCATION CLAIMS FOR VARIOUS PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE 53RD AVENUE DEVELOPMENT AND LINKAGE PROJECT WHEREAS, EDA Resolution No. 96 -214 directed the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center ( "Brooklyn Center EDA ") to administer and execute the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project, including administration and execution of all project activities; and WHEREAS the following properties to be acquired are included in the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project area: 5305 -4th Street North 5315 -4th Street North • 516 -53rd Avenue North 600 -53rd Avenue North 702 -53rd Avenue North 722 -53rd Avenue North 810 -53rd Avenue North 814 -53rd Avenue North 5306 Camden Avenue North 5318 Camden Avenue North WHEREAS, the EDA wishes to provide a procedure for acquiring the above - described properties by negotiated purchase when possible; and WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center EDA has reviewed the following items relative to the appraisals of the real property located at the addresses listed in paragraph 2 above: (a) appraisal reports; (b) review appraisals; and WHEREAS, the fair market values of the real property located at the addresses listed above have been established by the appraisal and review appraisal for each property; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Brooklyn Center EDA to present offers to the owners of the properties listed above based on the appraisal and review appraisals completed on the properties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center as follows: EDA RESOLUTION NO. 1. The appraisal and review appraisal documents referenced in paragraph 4 for the following properties are hereby accepted and the fair market values, as established by the appraisal and review appraisals, are hereby established as just compensation for the following properties as follows: Property Address Appraised Value 5305 -4th Street North $67,500 5315 -4th Street North $66,000 516 -53rd Avenue North $73,500 600 -53rd Avenue North $69,000 702 -53rd Avenue North $64,000 722 -53rd Avenue North $67,000 810 -53rd Avenue North $10,000 814 -53rd Avenue North $64,500 5306 Camden Avenue North $52,000 5318 Camden Avenue North $78,500 2. The Brooklyn Center EDA Executive Director is hereby authorized to make a written offer in the amount of the appraised value to the owners of the real • property listed in paragraph 1 above for the acquisition of the property. 3. The EDA Executive Director is hereby authorized to negotiate and execute purchase agreements on behalf of the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority for the properties listed in paragraph 1 above in the amount determined by the appraisal and review appraisal ( "Appraised Value "), in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended ( "Uniform Relocation Act "), regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, and pursuant to the purchase agreement form attached. 4. In cases in which the owners of the properties described in paragraph 1 above do not agree to the sale of such properties for the Appraised Value, the EDA Executive Director shall attempt to negotiate with such owners a purchase agreement acceptable to the landowner and secure the execution of such purchase agreement by the owner, which purchase agreement shall be submitted for approval to the EDA Board of Commissioners. 5. Claims for relocation benefits required by the Uniform Relocation Act duly submitted and in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Relocation Act may be approved by the EDA Executive Director and paid in accordance with the City purchasing policy. EDA RESOLUTION NO. • Date President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted g e against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • •