HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996 12-04 CCM Truth In Taxation Budget Hearing MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
TRUTH N TAXATION BUDGET HEARING
DECEMBER 4, 1996
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met for the Truth in Taxation Budget Hearing and was called to
order by Mayor Myrna Kragness at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Myrna Kragness, Councilmembers Kathleen Carmody, Debra Hilstrom, and Kristen Mann.
Also present: City Manager Michael J. McCauley, Finance Director Charlie Hansen, City Assessor
Stephen Baker, and Council Secretary LeAnn Larson.
Councilmember Charles F. Nichols, Sr., was absent.
PRESENTATION
City Manager McCauley explained the purpose of this meeting, that being to give the public an
opportunity to give input to the Council on the budget. By state law, the Council may not take action
to adopt the budget at this meeting.
The City Manager announced that the final budget would be adopted at the December 16, 1996,
Council meeting at City Hall at 7 p.m. A hearing on the budget will be held at that time.
City Manager McCauley gave an overview of the 1997 proposed budget and preliminary levy. The
proposed preliminary levy would increase the total real estate taxes levied by the City, EDA, and
HRA by slightly less than four percent above the gross levy for 1996.
The City Manager outlined the General Fund levy increase of four percent that would generate an
additional $247,786 in revenue for the General Fund. This increased levy would be used to fund
street projects in 1997 with cash rather than issuing debt. In comparing the 1996 budget to the 1997
budget in the same terms, the proposed 1997 budget represented a decrease in the operating budget.
While the proposed 1997 budget is higher than the 1996 budget, the 1997 budget contains $394,197
for construction transfer for street projects and debt service of $251,315. When adjusted for the
12/4/96 -1-
construction transfer and the debt service, the 1997 budget is $152,419 lower than the 1996 budget
that did not contain those two items.
The increase in the levy of four percent was the first increase since the 1995 levy. The final 1996
levy was actually lower than the 1995 levy. The average over the two years 1996 and 1997 was two
percent per year for the growth in the levy. While an individual property might have an increase or
decrease in their City taxes that was at a higher or lower percentage than four percent due to the state
formula applied to determining taxes and tax capacity, the City's income from taxes would only
increase by four percent.
Debt service requirements will increase in 1997 due to the issuance of special assessment bonds
including the City's share for 1996 street projects.
City Manager McCauley noted the General Fund Budget for 1997 involves converting to a new
system from the multiple departments containing fractional employees to a more unified division
format.
The City Manager highlighted some specific changes and issues in the draft budget before presenting
1997 proposed taxes as compared to 1996 actual taxes for a given parcel. He discussed the impact
of increase valuation on proposed taxes, tax rate calculations, and the shift in percentage of the tax
base comprised by commercial properties which decreased from 1996 to 1997 and residential
properties which increased from 1996 to 1997.
PUBLIC INPUT
Mayor Kragness encouraged residents at the meeting to offer input on any issues pertaining to the
1997 City budget.
David Mulla, 6732 Willow Lane North, inquired why the proposed tax increase (as reported on his
Proposed Property Tax Statement for 1997) for the City portion of his taxes increased more than the
increase in value of his home. The City Manager discussed that a one percent increase in value of
a home over $72,000 increases tax capacity on that home by two percent. Thus, a 7.9 percent
increase in value results in a 15.8 percent increase in tax capacity.
Joyce Samuelson, 4207 Lakeside Avenue #229, asked why there was so little difference in the value
between her one bedroom townhome versus a neighbor's two bedroom unit. City Assessor Baker
will look into this situation.
Dan Remiarz, 6201 June Avenue North, inquired about the differences in increases between the other
taxing districts (i.e., Hennepin County, the various school districts, etc.) and the increase in the City
portion of his tax. Mr. Remiarz also asked about the use of watershed funds. Councilmember Mann
responded to these issues.
12/4/96 -2-
Bruce Morrow, 7212 Willow Lane North, disagreed with the state's method of valuation (i.e., market
value) for his property. City Assessor Baker explained the valuation method presently used by the
state.
Susan Niemi, 3824 France Place, asked what the Council was doing to attract growth in the
commercial sector in order to offset the increase in taxes to residential properties. She especially
was concerned about the affect these increases will have on elderly /limited income people and the
decreasing value of Brookdale. Mayor Kragness noted that the Council is also concerned about
Brookdale and cited the growth of commercial businesses in other areas of Brooklyn Center.
Bob Paulson, 7012 France Avenue North, questioned improvements to his property and its
relationship to value increases and This Old House exclusions. City Assessor Baker will look into
Mr. Paulson's issue.
A motion by Councilmember Carmody and seconded by Councilmember Mann to close the hearing
passed unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT
A motion by Councilmember Carmody and seconded by Councilmember Mann to adjourn the
meeting at 8:07 p.m. passed unanimously.
City Clerk Mayor
Recorded and transcribed by:
LeAnn Larson
I
12/4/96 _;_