The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1996 01-08 CCP Regular Session • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER January 8, 1996 7 p.m. 1. Call to�Or er 2. Roll Call 3. Opening Ceremonies — fYWkZ,�i 4. Council Report 5. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda -The following items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by o motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at the end of Council Consideration Items. C Cx-r- a. Approval of Minutes Councilmembers not present at meetings will be recorded as abstaining from the vote ® on the minutes. 9-L i VUn --7) 1. December 6, 1995 - Truth in Taxation Budget Hearing 2. December 11, 1995 - Regular Session 3. December 13, 1995 - Continued Truth -in- Taxation Hearing 4. December 18, 1995 - Special Session C� } -p b. Resolution Designating Official Newspaper kL s V M - b Z Resolution Designating Depositories of City Funds KffY - Ca. P p may. ,r3,.- .�.Ze_m �r. On- Sa1 Liquor- L iceIISe for - St. - Alphonsus Catholic Church __� Establishing. �pro�zerfle�xwPro }ect- �- .K_:�995- 2fl�We °Ann Maintenance, Accepting Quote and Awarding a Contract V Li k-ryl � apva Ce Resolution Accepting Work Performed and Approving Final Payment for 1995 Diseased Tree Removal Program, Improvement Project No. 1995 -10, Contract 1995 -C g. Licenses kA J k'r) ;--> at &LL S 6. Open Forum CITY COUTINCIL AGENDA - 2- January 8, 1996 7. Public Hearing a. An Ordinance Amending 3 Ordinance No. 94 -01 Regarding Chapter � of the City Ordinances Concerning the Zoning Classification of Certain Land -This ordinance was first read on December 11, 1995, published in the City's official newspaper on December 20, 1995, and is offe a pu is hearing and second reading. i1t� lz� rl1. S. Council Consideration Items: p )a. Resolution Acknowledging and Congratulating Jenny Whiting as the City of Brooklyn Center Employee of the Quarter, Fourth Quarter 199 -, and Congratulating all Fourth Quarter Nominees �} U, � b. Resolution Acknowledging and Congratulating Bob Cahlander as the 1995 City f Brooklyn Center Employee of the Year tY Resolution Acknowledging Gift from the Lions Club of Brooklyn Center for "Entertainment in the Park" D 4 d. Resolution Expressing Recognition and Appreciation of Barb Kalligher for Her y Dedicated Public Service as Councilmember i `. L 0 e. Resolution Expressing Recognition and Appreciation of Members Who Have Served " on Commissions � km /�� f Mayoral Appointment: Ad Hoc Communications Task Force -- - ;;p N t £ X71 {� v J ; Select residing Officers - Mayor Pro Tim and -kcting Mayor Pro Terr� KIY) � T� 1 c9- r�z..�2�... . �C� L�!-� h. Designate Council Liaisonsity Adv'so Coma.1 'ons ( c,i INA j "�- IL i. Mayoral Reappointments_ of City Advisory Commis Terms Have Expired Resolution Declarin ommitmen t the Broo yn Center City Charter, Pledging Fair `+� Treatment of Employees, Declaring Against Conflicts of Interest and Mis Positions use of k. Approval of 1996 Capital Improvern Program (CIP) -- 1. Resolution Authorizing Project Peace Joint Powers Agreement Providing Services Relating to Domestic Abuse Intervention ",UU 9A ' Call CiA �t C ,UCL U t`b' �� K >�� CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - 3 - January 8, 1996 m. Discussion of Council Tours o City Fire Sta ions City Hall j Community C nter �(��LYL .CP cc .��t�ceu- u�� ca l �' cc� j '�� and , ! � Lc c� �t,,��lL n. Set Date for City Council Informal Discussion with City Manager 2J J o. Discuss Se (IGUI �� 0 ern 1 ouncil Work ho in April with Facilitator M()I 12r 11 �L C4-) d1hi ouw � E'dj C &b c�N Resolution Consenting to Conveyance of Real Property M 9. Adjournment I i EDA AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER it I,L`{.1.t _ JANUARY 8, 1996 C I. Call to Order � I 2. Roll Call A; - • 3. Approval of Agenda and Consent A ltd �' -The following items are considered to be routine by the Economi Development Authority and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at the end of Commission Consideration Items. Q' -,�r' � q p c�- LL 'tom a. Approval of Minutes: Commissioners not present at meetings will be recorded as abstaining from the vote on the minutes. �� ) 1 0. ► 1. December 11, 1995 - Regular Session 2. December "18, 1995 - Regular Session q ( b Resolution Electing Officers for the Economic Development Autho iry in and for the City of Brooklyn Center i Resolution Designating Depositories of EDA Funds C m Lam, 4. Commission Consideration Items 5. Adjournment .60 ,prm D4 Council Meeting Date January 8. 1996 3[City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number - -! 5 - 4 5 ;- , - is Request For Council Consideration Item Description: City Council Minutes December 6, 1995 - Truth in Taxation Budget Hearing December 11, 1995 - Regular Session December 13, 1995 - Continued Truth in Taxation Hearing December 18, 1995 - Special Session Department Approval: City Clerk Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this rep Comments below /attached • Recommended City Council Action: Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached Yes ) December 6, 1995 - Truth in Taxation Budget Hearing Barb Kalligher was absent from the meeting and the minutes will reflect her abstention from the vote on these minutes. December 11, 1995 - Regular Session Barb Kalligher was absent from the meeting and the minutes will reflect her abstention from the vote on these minutes. December 13, 1995 - Continued Truth in Taxation Hearing Barb Kalligher was absent from the meeting and the minutes will reflect her abstention from the vote on these minutes. December 18, 1995 - Special Session All Councilmembers were present. • MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TRUTH -IN- TAXATION BUDGET HEARING DECEMBER 6, 1995 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met for a Truth -in- Taxation Budget Hearing and was called to order by Mayor Myrna Kragness at 7 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Myrna Kragness, Councilmembers Kathleen Carmody, Debra Hilstrom, Kristen Mann. Also present were Interim City Manager Cam Andre, Director of Finance Charlie Hansen, and Council Secretary Connie Beckman. Councilmember Kalligher was absent and excused. PRESENTATION The Director of Finance explained the 1996 proposed budget and the property tax system. PUBLIC HEARING At 7:13 p.m., a motion by Councilmember Carmody and seconded by Councilmember Mann to open the public hearing regarding the 1996 proposed budget passed unanimously. Mayor Kragness encouraged residents present at the meeting to offer input on any issues pertaining to the 1996 City budget. PUBLIC HEARING- SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECT Two citizens, Arlys Lowell and Agnes Hornquist, 6125 North Lilac Drive, talked about the Five Cities Senior Transportation Project supporting the continuation of the program indicating: - Some people are totally dependent on the bus system to complete shopping for food, clothing, and appointments. - The bus system offers general opportunities for socialization. - Some people who shouldn't be driving would be forced to drive their personal vehicles. Agnes indicated, who initiated a petition in support of the bus system, indicated that various residents would even be willing to pay an additional amount in support of the bus system. 12/06/95 - 1 - Mayor Kragness acknowledged concerns of the citizens and the large correspondence received in support of the Five Senior Transportation Project. PUBLIC HEARNG- OVERALL 1996 PROPOSED BUDGET Nancy Carlson, 6024 Aldrich Avenue North, expressed concerns in length about the following: Earle Brown Heritage Center and perceived mismanagement; historical issues pertaining to Council inquiries of information and respective provision of requested information; various "social programs" (i.e. Senior Transportation Project, Project Peace Makers) she felt needed to be cut; Assessed Stabilization Program, CEIP, Community Center; businesses owned by the City (i.e. golf course, liquor stores (63rd location), Inn on the Farm (Earle Brown Restaurant, Convention Center, commercial property for rent, catering operation)) she perceived as being money losers; Earle Brown Commons Apartments and how she feels back taxes owed have hurt the City; TIF District creation history regarding the Earle Brown properties; union organization; and code enforcement. PUBLIC HEARING- PEACE MAKER CENTER Thirteen people came forward offering verbal support and statistics on the Peace Maker Center and its respective services. Those presenting verbal affirmation included members of the Center's Board of Directors, the Program Director, volunteers of the Center, family members of children served by the Center who are now volunteers of the Center, and representatives of local businesses - -J.C. Penney and Sears - -who have benefitted from the Center's services. The Center's Program Director explained that referrals to the program include some from outside of Brooklyn Center, and charges are made on an ability to pay basis. Referrals are from the police department; stores via the police department; and Operation Dalloble. Councilmember Hilstrom questioned if a store where the Center's intervention services are used have provided funds. Stores have responded to requests for funds by referring the Center to the respective foundations but to date with no success. Councilmember Hilstrom questioned if families of persons involved are charged for the Center's services. There is an assessment charge of $50 but this is paid from a benevolence fund when the family is unable to pay. Councilmember Hilstrom inquired about a breakdown of primary crimes committed that are serviced by the Center. In November, 1995, forty -three cases were referred to the Center: thirty -four for shoplifting; two for assault; three for financial transaction fraud; one for theft; one for offering forged check; one for trespassing; one for possession of stolen property. MOTION TO CONTINUE TRUTH -IN- TAXATION BUDGET HEARING TO DECEMBER 13 1995 AT 7 P.M. A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Carmody at 8:37 p.m. to continue the Truth -in- Taxation Budget Hearing to December 13, 1995, at 7 p.m. passed unanimously. 12/06/95 -2- 0 Deputy City Clerk Mayor Recorded and transcribed by: Connie Beckman Timesaver Off Site Secretarial • 1 12/06/95 -3 - MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL • OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY O HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION DECEMBER 11, 1995 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Myrna Kragness at 7:10 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Myrna Kragness, Councilmembers Kathleen Carmody, Debra Hilstrom, Kristen Mann. Also present were Interim City Manager Cam Andre, Director of Public Services Diane Spector, Director of Community Development Brad Hoffman, Community Development Specialist Tom Bublitz, Planning and Zoning Specialist Ron Warren, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere and Council Secretary Connie Beckman. A letter was presented to Mayor Kragness on behalf of Councilmember Kalligher by Mr. Vaughn. • OPENING CEREMONIES A moment of silence was observed in place of the invocation. COUNCIL REPORT Councilmember Mann talked about the Holiday Party to be held on Saturday, December 16, 1995, at the Humboldt substation from 2 -4 p.m. Councilmember Mann requested Mayor Kragness to read aloud Councilmember Kalligher's letter. Mayor Kragness read the letter which stated Barb Kalligher's resignation was effective December 15, 1995. Councilmember Mann questioned the City Attorney about Councilmember Kalligher's letter of resignation and the legal implications in filling the vacant position. The City Attorney advised Council accept the letter of resignation via written resolution at tonight's meeting, then officially declare the position vacant at the December 18, 1995, meeting. A special election would be required by City Charter since there would be more than one year left in the vacant position. An official election date would have to be established within twenty days of the position's official vacancy. The City Attorney said City staff could provide information at the December 18, 1995, Council meeting pertaining to the setting of the election. 12/11/95 _ 1 Councilmember Hilstrom requested information pertaining on the possibility of conducting a mail - out- ballot election. Mayor Kragness acknowledged that a recent election done in this manner • produced good results and supported this approach. Mayor Kragness identified the formation of a new church; Jehovah Jirah Church of God of Christ, located at 6120 Xerxes Avenue North, and welcomed it accordingly. Mayor Kragness talked about the Scope Awards facilitated by Brookdale. There were seventeen different organizations that participated in a receipt gathering /redeeming effort. Each organization received $500 with the top receipt redeeming organization receiving an additional $1000. This same effort will be done twice in 1996. There will be a thank -you reception for the Interim City Manager recognizing his service to Brooklyn Center on Monday, December 18, 1995, from 6:30 -7 p.m. at the City Hall. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Carmody to approve the December 11, 1995, agenda with the removal of Items 5(a) numbers 1 and 2 and addition of Item 7(g) Resolution Accepting Resignation of Councilmember Barb Kalligher to the consent agenda passed unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES . A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Carmody to approve minutes of the November 18, 1995- Special Session and November 27, 1995 - Regular Session as printed passed unanimously. AMENDED 1996 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Carmody to approve the amended 1996 City Council meeting schedule as printed passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -263 Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPOINTING MICHAEL J. MCCAULEY TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE FIVE CITIES SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kathleen Carmody and passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -264 Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 12/11/95 -2- RESOLUTION APPOINTING MICHAEL J. MCCAULEY TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF HENNEPIN RECYCLING GROUP The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kathleen Carmody and passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -265 Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPOINTING MICHAEL J. MCCAULEY AS DIRECTOR TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF LOGIS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kathleen Carmody and passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -266 Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION REQUESTING TRANSFER OF TITLE FOR ONE PARCEL OF TAX - FORFEITED LAND ON APPRAISAL LIST 901 -NC TO THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FOR PARK PURPOSES • The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kathleen Carmody and passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -267 Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTATIONS AND AUTHORIZING SERVICES FOR 1995 ANNUAL SANITARY SEWER TELEVISION INSPECTION PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1995 -19 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kathleen Carmody and passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -268 Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1995 -16, CONTRACT 1995 -H, BRYANT AVENUE SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION 12/11/95 -3 - The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kathleen Carmody and passed unanimously. • ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 94 -01 REGARDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES CONCERNING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LAND addressing a typographical error in the legal description in Ordinance No 94-01) A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Carmody to approve the ordinance amending Ordinance No. 94 -01 regarding chapter 35 of the City ordinances concerning the zoning classification of certain land passed unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF 1996 LIQUOR LICENSES A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Carmody to approve consideration of 1996 liquor licenses passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -269 Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1995 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO PROVIDE FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kathleen Carmody and passed unanimously. • FINAL PLAT APPROVAL - OVERPECK ADDITION A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Y pp Councilmember Carmody to approve the final plat for or Overpeck Addition passed unanimously. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL - CARL SWING ADDITION A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Carmody to approve the final plat for Carl Swing Addition passed unanimously. LICENSES A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Carmody to approve the following list of licenses passed unanimously: BOWLING ALLEY Earle Brown Bowl, Inc. 6440 James Circle COMMERCIAL KENNEL Brooklyn Pet Hospital 4902 France Ave. N. GASOLINE SERVICE STATION Brookdale Unocal 76 5710 Xerxes Ave. N. 12/11/95 -4- Metropolitan Transit Commiss. 6845 Shingle Cr. Pkway. Mobil 4504 /Randy Rau 6849 Brooklyn Blvd, U.S. West 6540 Shingle Cr. Pkwy. United States Post Office 6848 Lee Ave. N. Bill West's Service Ctr. 2000 57th Ave. N. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Riverside Mechanical 1410 98th Ln. NW POOL AND BILLIARD TABLES American Amusement Arcades 6357 N. Lilac Dr. PUBLIC DANCE Earle Brown Bowl, Inc. 6440 James Circle SIGN HANGERS DeMars Signs g s 410 93rd Ave. NW TOBACCO RELATED PRODUCTS American Amusement Arcades 6357 N. Lilac Dr. Brookdale Unocal 76 5710 Xerxes Ave. N. Duoos Bros. American Legion 4307 70th Ave. N. Earle Brown Bowl, Inc. 6440 James Circle Jerry's New Market 5801 Xerxes Ave. N. K-Mart 5930 Earle Brown Dr. Mobil #504/Randy Rau 6849 Brooklyn Blvd. I OPEN FORUM Dr. Duane Orn-- resident of Brooklyn Center since 1962 -- requested continued financial support for the Earle Brown Farm. Dr. Orn indicated a willingness to facilitate reconstituting and organizing of a committee to address issues relating to the Farm and its operation. Mr. Bill Greenwald - -owner of a small manufacturing business -- reiterated support for the Earle Brown Farm/Heritage Center and indicated it provides good visibility for the community. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS RESOLUTIO t N APPROVING HOUSING GOALS AGREEMENT UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT The Community Development Specialist explained the programming; city index numbers; benchmark numbers; and goals for the City. The City's Housing Commission and City staff recommended a major focus on higher value housing and maintaining of existing affordable housing. �' 12/11/95 - 5 - RESOLUTION NO. 95 -270 Member Kathleen Carmody introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING HOUSING GOALS AGREEMENT UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Debra Hilstrom and passed as follows: Councilmembers Carmody, Hilstrom, and Mayor Kragness (yes); Councilmember Mann (no). Councilmember Mann stated she felt passing of such a resolution would further the bureaucratic layers of City government and thus voted "no." PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO 95013 SUBMITTED BY ROLAND MORGAN REQUESTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A HOME BARBER SHOP AT 6115 ALDRICH AVENUE NORTH Planning and Zoning Specialist Ron Warren talked about Mr. Morgan's request for a special use permit and corresponding details. He noted the Planning Commission recommended approval of this application at its November 30, 1995, meeting subject to the following conditions: 1. This Special Use Permit is granted only for a home barbershop to Roland A. Morgan as the sole operator. The use may not be altered or expanded in any way without first securing an amendment to this special use permit. 2. This Special use permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations. Any violation thereof may be grounds for revocation. 3. All parking associated with this home occupation shall be off - street on improved space provided by the applicant for a maximum of six vehicles. 4. The hours of operation shall be between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Customers shall be served on an appointment -only basis. 5. The applicant shall install a smoke detector and fire extinguisher in the area of the home occupation, and shall provide extended handrails leading to the basement area. 6. A current copy of the applicant's State license shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of the Special Use Permit. 12/11/95 -6- A motion by Councilmember Carmody and seconded by Councilmember Hilstrom to approve the . Planning Commission Application No. 95013 submitted by Roland Morgan passed unanimously. DISCUSSION REGARDING REVIEW OF THE REQUESTS FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ.) FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE The Planning and Zoning Specialist talked about updating the Comprehensive Plan. Requests for potential vendors and their qualifications have been solicited with a number responding. The Planning and Zoning Commission requested that a member of Council serve on the interviewing committee. It was agreed that Councilmember Hilstrom will serve on the interviewing committee. STAFF REPORT RE: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SHINGLE CREEK REGIONAL POND The Director of Public Services reported on the status of the Shingle Creek Regional Pond. The next step is to develop a feasibility study. Based on information already received and background history of related projects, it was believed that selecting Short Elliot Hendrickson (SEH) directly to develop the feasibility study might be more time and cost effective than to go through the RFP process. The Director of Public Services explained there are two options for funding the project: Storm Drainage Utility; or CDBG funds. If CDBG funds were used, Council would be required to conduct a public hearing on the reallocation of funds already designated. Councilmember Mann questioned the City Attorney on legal implications of not moving forward with an RFP. He indicated there would be no problems of not utilizing the RFP process. Councilmember Mann then acknowledged SEH would be appropriate for the project given reasons stated by staff. Councilmember Carmody inquired about the financial impact of using either proposed funding source. Councilmember Carmody ndicated she would like to see Storm Drainage e Utili funding y g �' g used for the project. A motion by Councilmember Carmody and seconded by Councilmember Mann to approve utilizing SEH for the project with funding being utilized from the Storm Drainage Utility passed unanimously. PROPOSED 1996 PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Director of Public Services talked about the 1996 Park CIP; playground equipment replacement; retaining wall and miscellaneous improvements; Northport tennis court replacement; and miscellaneous park lighting. Councilmember Mann cited previous joint ventures and inquired about the possibility of doing this with schools who use some of the facilities slated for improvement during 1996. The Director of • 12/11/95 -7 Public Services indicated these schools could be approached but doubted they would fiscallyA to participate given budget issues. Councilmember Carmody talked about Riverdale Park and indicated she has received constituent requests for some improvements to this park in the near future. Since Riverdale Park is not scheduled for improvements until 1997, she requested Bellevue be switched with Riverdale Park. A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Carmody to approve the proposed 1996 Park Capital Improvement Plan as printed with amending of Riverdale Park being done in 1996 and Bellvue being done in 1997 passed unanimously. STAFF REPORT - ASSESSMENT STABILIZATION PROGRAM The Director of Public Services discussed the stabilization program for financing street improvements. Staff requested direction on whether Council desired to continue the program and scheduling of any changes. Councilmember Mann inquired about the Senior Deferral Program and how this might apply as a potential funding source. The Director of Public Services talked about qualifications (at least one resident in the household has to be 65 years old). Councilmember Mann expressed concerns about negative impacts on Brooklyn Center residents and desired a solution which would best meet residents' needs. Mayor Kragness wanted to see Council look more closely at this situation because of struggling families and adjusting to levels as a result of "tightened formulas." Councilmember Hilstrom expressed support of the program. Council directed staff to study options for other sources of funding. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING RESIGNATION OF COUNCILMEMBER BARB KALLIGHER RESOLUTION NO. 95 -271 Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING RESIGNATION OF COUNCILMEMBER BARB KALLIGHER The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kathleen Carmody and passed unanimously. Councilmember Hilstrom read a portion of the resolution indicating Barb Kalligher's resignation date as December 15, 1995, and expressed appreciation of her dedicated service to the City. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA NOVEMBER 6.1995-SPECIAL WORK SESSION • A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Carmody passed unanimously to approve corrected minutes of the November 6, 1995 - Special Work Session as follows: page two, paragraph three should be changed to North Hennepin Mediation Program. 12/11/95 -8- NOVEMBER 13,1995-REGULAR SESSION A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Carmody passed unanimously to approved corrected minutes of the November I3, 1995 - Regular Session as follows: page ten, paragraph six should be changed to Mr. Withers being contacted at a salary amount of $70,000 (not $79,900). ADJOURNMENT A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Carmody to adjourn the meeting at 8:15 p.m. passed unanimously. City Clerk Mayor Recorded and transcribed by: Connie Beckman TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial 12/11/95 -9- MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL • OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA CONTINUED TRUTH -IN- TAXATION HEARING DECEMBER 13, 1995 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met for the continued Truth -in- Taxation hearing and was called to order by Mayor Myrna Kragness at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Myrna Kragness, Councilmembers Kathleen Carmody, Debra Hilstrom, and Kristen Mann. Also present were Interim City Manager Cam Andre, and Director of Finance Charlie Hansen. Councilmember Barb Kalligher was absent. PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Kragness opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on the 1996 proposed budget. Mayor Kragness recognized Mr. Richard Hauck, 6870 Shingle Creek Parkway. Mr. Hauck stated he is a board member for the North Hennepin Mediation Project. He explained that while the North Hennepin Mediation Project receives funding from several sources there is still a need for $5,000 from the City. Mayor Kragness inquired what the total budget is for the North Hennepin Mediation Project. Mr. Hauck stated the budget is $90,000 and the Project serves over 500 cases each year. Mayor Kragness recognized Mr. Patrick Thomas, 5922 Bryant Avenue North. Mr. Thomas commented on a newspaper article from earlier in the year noting the article said that Brooklyn Center has the third highest tax rate. Councilmember Carmody responded that the study was based on home values of $100,000 and that Brooklyn Center does not have many homes with values of $100,000. Councilmember Mann stated that the difference between the 1995 and 1996 budget is a decrease of .66 %. Mr. Thomas stated he believed many citizens would rather have services cut than receive a tax increase. Mayor Kragness recognized Ms. Nancy Carlson, 6024 Aldrich Avenue North. Ms. Carlson stated she did not believe the article referred to by Mr. Thomas was incorrect. She added she feels the cost of the water and sewer utilities adds to the residents tax burden. She reminded the Council they had promised hard cuts in the 1996 budget. She added that the City should continue to work on improving streets and sewers and noted the need for code enforcement for the City's deteriorating housing stock. • 12 -13 -95 -1- Mayor Kragness then recognized Mr. Bob Peppe, 6713 Toledo Avenue North. Mr. Peppe stated • 1995 has been a big year for the Council, noting they had several difficult issues i.e. City Manager recruitment, Liquor Stores and the Earle Brown Heritage Center. He complimented the City Council on a job well done. Mayor Kragness recognized Mr. Dan Remiarz, 6201 June Avenue North. Mr. Remiarz also complimented the City Council on the achievements of the past year and the changes they have made. He stated the report submitted to the City Council on the Heritage Center indicates the need for change. Mr. Remiarz noted he received a copy of the organizational chart and questioned why staff continually asks for consultants when there are so many experts on staff. Mayor Kragness again recognized Mr. Patrick Thomas who inquired what effect the federal cutbacks would have on the City. The Director of Finance stated the City currently receives $270,000 from the federal government and this is used for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. He explained the county and school districts receive much more funding from the federal government and if this funding is cut it will indirectly affect the City but it is not possible to determine how it would impact the City. There was a motion by Councilmember Carmody and seconded by Councilmember Mann to close the Truth -in- Taxation Public Hearing. The motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNME The meeting adjourned at 7:32 p.m. Deputy City Clerk Mayor 12 -13 -95 -2- MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL • OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIAL SESSION DECEMBER 18, 1995 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in special session and was called to order by Mayor Myrna Kragness at 7:09 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Myrna Kragness, Councilmembers Kathleen Carmody, Debra Hilstrom, and Kristen Mann. Also present were Interim City Manager Cam Andre, Director of Finance Charlie Hansen, City Clerk Sharon Knutson, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Council Secretary Connie Beckman. OPENING CEREMONIES There were none. COUNCIL REPORT • There were none. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS RESOLUTION CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION TO FILL A COUNCIL VACANCY Councilmember Mann expressed a desire to hold a special election as soon as possible. Councilmember Hilstrom agreed and inquired how soon a primary could be held within legal guidelines. The City Attorney reviewed the resolution at hand and respective regulations. The City Clerk informed Council of research results done and indicated that since Brooklyn Center is a Charter City State guidelines require the City to set dates in such a manner that would be "nearly as conforming to State Statutes." Prospective dates were discussed and it was determined that the following would most likely meet the "nearly as conforming" requirement: January 30, 1996- filings close; March 12, 1996 - primary; March 26, 1996- special election. Councilmember Mann inquired about the qualifications of being able to obtain an absentee ballot. The City Clerk indicated the reason for obtaining an absentee ballot must be stated on each respective ballot. Councilmember Hilstrom inquired about utilizing a mail -in- ballot for a special election. The City Clerk responded that only elections pertaining to a referendum or question is allowed on a mail-in- 12/18/95 - I - ballot. She added that currently there are test elections in which mail -in- ballots are being utilized • to better study their effectiveness and/or potential for implementation in elections other than referendums and/or questions posed to the voters. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -272 Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption changing the date of the Special Election to March 26, 1996, and the date of the Special Primary to March 12, 19960 RESOLUTION CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION TO FILL A COUNCIL VACANCY The motion for the adoption of the foregoing amended resolution was duly seconded by member Kathleen Carmody and passed unanimously. ALTERNATIVE BUDGET PROPOSAL BY COUNCILMEMBER CARMODY Councilmember Carmody presented Council with a listing of personally proposed cuts she believed were appropriate for Council to consider prior to official adoption of budget for the year 1996. She cited a potential addition of monies (savings from elimination of the Communications Coordinator position - $25,000; savings from lower interest rates on the street improvement bonds - $10,000; and increased revenues or reduced expenses in the recreation budget- $12,000) Council would have to work with when considering cuts. Councilmember Hilstrom indicated a desire to look individually programs at social rams she sees the City g funding which could easily be eliminated due to low results and/or duplication. Councilmember Carmody agreed with Councilmember Hilstrom but suggested there are some areas where social programs need to continue. Mayor Kragness referred to Councilmember Carmody's proposed listing of cuts and offered support accordingly. Councilmember Hilstrom said the incoming city manager should decide what positions are cut. She referred to social programs which are currently being funded by the City and reiterated a desire to see some serious cuts in this area. She also talked about monies which are indirectly affecting other City efforts (i.e. code enforcement) and stated Council needed to look at the big picture with considering cuts /reapportionment of budget funds. Councilmember Carmody didn't believe the "big picture" was being looked at. i Councilmember Mann said Council needed to hold to budget cuts and instead apportion an additional $10,000 for use by the city manager to establish priorities. The Interim City Manager stated staff needed to have some direction for City business to commence on January 1, 1996. 12/18/95 -2- SUMMARY OF HUMAN SERVICE AGREEMENTS /JOINT POWERS PROJECT PEACE A motion by Councilmember Hilstrom and seconded by Councilmember Mann to approve proposed funding for Project Peace in 1996 passed unanimously. 5 CITIES SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECT Councilmember Mann said Council should not fund this project. She proposed that Council consider funding the Project through April 30, 1996. In the meantime, riders should be notified of service ending April 1996, and informed of transportation alternatives listing compiled by City staff. A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Hilstrom to discontinue funding of the 5 Cities Senior Transportation Project after April 30, 1996, and proper notification of riders failed as follows: Councilmembers Mann and Hilstrom (yes); Councilmember Carmody and Mayor Kragness (no). The Director of Finance strongly urged Council come to some agreement regarding the Project. Councilmember Hilstrom reiterated the need to cut areas where funding could be used instead for code enforcement. Councilmember Carmody doubted code enforcement would use the monies effectively as there is an apparent need for restructuring of the department instead. The Interim City Manager encouraged Council to look at other areas where monies are being • allocated first and then return to the Project for a final decision. I.N.V.I.T.E. INC. A motion by Councilmember Hilstrom and seconded by Councilmember Mann to cut I.N.V.I.T.E. Inc.'s funding for 1996 passed as follows: Councilmembers Hilstrom and Mann, Mayor Kragness (yes); Councilmember Carmody (no). NORTHWEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL A motion by Councilmember Hilstrom and seconded by Councilmember Mann to approve proposed funding for Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council in 1996 passed unanimously. BROOKLYN PEACEMAKER A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Hilstrom to cut funding for Brooklyn Peacemaker in 1996 failed as follows: Councilmembers Mann and Hilstrom (yes); Councilmember Carmody and Mayor Kragness (no). Councilmember Hilstrom cited years of City funding to this effort while no monies have been given to the program by stores who benefit from the effort. 12/18/95 - 3 - A motion by Mayor Kragness and seconded by Councilmember Carmody to fund the Brooklyn • Peacemaker at $5,000 for 1996 failed as follows: Mayor Kragness and Councilmember Carmody (yes); Councilmembers Mann and Hilstrom (no). Councilmember Hilstrom stated there is not enough money to fund all of the programs, and cuts must be made and Council must reach a decision. A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Hilstrom to fund 5 Cities Senior Transportation Project ($3,866) through April 30, 1996, passed unanimously. NORTH HENNEPIN MEDIATION PROJECT A motion by Councilmember Hilstrom and seconded by Councilmember Mann to approve funding of North Hennepin Mediation Project for 1996 passed unanimously. Councilmember Carmody questioned Councilmember Hilstrom regarding her support of the Project. Councilmember Hilstrom explained the program is available to anyone and believed it encompasses a larger variety of people. CEAP A motion by Councilmember Carmody and seconded by Councilmember Mann to deny funding for CEAP for 1996 passed unanimously. Councilmember Hilstrom questioned funding an effort for the first time when others which have been supported in the past by the City are being cut. She cited the City does support CEAP in other ways such as Holly Sunday where a toy is donated to CEAP and also reduced price swimming with a canned good which is donated to CEAP. 5 CITIES SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECT A motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Hilstrom to approve the remaining funding of $6,315 for the 5 Cities Senior Transportation Project (for a total funding of $10,181) passed unanimously. Councilmember Carmody shared information she believed was appropriate with offering creative funding alternatives to patrons of the Project. Councilmember Mann indicated an appropriateness of encouraging patrons of the Project to facilitate fundraising to offset the difference between what Council would approve and overall needed funding. Councilmember Hilstrom requested if residents are unable to fund raise, Council be informed accordingly. The Director of Finance summarized the total social services budget as follows: Project Peace $47,953 5 Cities Senior Transporation Project $10,181 I.N.V.I.T.E. Inc. $0 12/18/95 -4- CEAP $0 • Brooklyn Peacemaker $0 North Hennepin Mediation Project $5,000 Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council $15,413 Total $78,547 Mayor Kragness questioned the status of funding Brooklyn Peacemaker since it was a tie vote. It was Council consensus funds were not available for Brooklyn Peacemaker for 1996. RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL TAX CAPACITY LEVY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COST OF OPERATION PROVIDING INFORMATIONAL SERVICE AND RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF MSA 469.001 THROUGH 469.047 OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FOR THE YEAR 1996 RESOLUTION NO. 95 -273 Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL TAX CAPACITY LEVY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COST OF OPERATION, PROVIDING INFORMATIONAL SERVICE, AND RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF MSA 469.001 THROUGH 469.047 OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FOR THE YEAR 1996 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Hilstrom and passed as follows: Councilmembers Mann and Hilstrom, Mayor Kragness (yes); Councilmember Carmody (no). RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A FINAL TAX LEVY FOR 1996 APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE GENERAL FUND THE STREET IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE FUNDS, THE E.D.A. FUND, AND THE H.R.A. FUND BUDGETS The Director of Finance explained information regarding the tax cut ($10,000 from previous year). Councilmember Hilstrom expressed desire to see the seal coating amount of $3,900 continue. Councilmember Carmody proposed the $3,900 be taken out of proceeds from the property tax increase. RESOLUTION NO-95-274 Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption based on an amended dollar amount by the Director of Finance: 12/18/95 -5 - RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A FINAL TAX LEVY FOR 1996 APPROPRIATIONS FOR • THE GENERAL FUND, THE STREET IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE FUNDS, THE E.D.A. FUND, AND THE H.R.A. FUND BUDGETS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing amended resolution was duly seconded by member Kathleen Carmody and passed unanimously. RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1996 PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR THE GENERAL FUND THE STREET IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE FUNDS THE E.D.A. FUND AND THE H.R.A. FUND Councilmember Carmody indicated she could not support approval of this resolution based on disagreement with social services cuts. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -275 Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption based on an amended dollar amount by the Director of Finance: RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1996 PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR THE GENERAL FUND, THE STREET IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE FUNDS, THE E.D.A. FUND, AND THE H.R.A. FUND The motion for the adoption of the foregoing amended resolution was duly seconded by member • Debra Hilstrom and passed as follows: Councilmembers Mann, and Hilstrom, Mayor Kragness (yes); Councilmember Carmody (no). RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1996 PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS RESOLUTION NO. 95 -276 Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1996 PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kathleen Carmody and passed unanimously. RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1996 PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR THE ENTERPRISE FUNDS Councilmember Hilstrom indicated she could not approve this resolution because she believes a lot of work has yet to be done. Councilmember Mann stated she believes staff has made good progress in addressing the City's needs. 12/18/95 -6- RESOLUTION NO. 95 -277 . Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1996 PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR THE ENTERPRISE FUNDS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kathleen Carmody and passed as follows: Councilmembers Mann and Carmody, Mayor Kragness (yes); Councilmember Debra Hilstrom (no). RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1996 PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR THE INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS RESOLUTION NO. 95 -278 Member Debra Hilstrom introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1996 PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR THE INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kathleen Carmody and passed unanimously. RESOLUTION SETTING WAGES AND SALARIES FOR THE YEAR 1996 RESOLUTION NO. 95 -279 Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION SETTING WAGES AND SALARIES FOR THE YEAR 1996 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kathleen Carmody and passed unanimously. SETTING DATE FOR ANNUAL JOINT MEETING BETWEEN CITY COUNCIL AND CITY ADVISORY COMMISSIONS A motion by Councilmember Hilstrom and seconded by Councilmember Mann to set the meeting date for the annual joint meeting between City Council and City Advisory Commissions for Wednesday, February 7, 1996, passed unanimously. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING APPRECIATION AND THANKS TO CAMILLE (CAM) ANDRE INTERIM CITY MANAGER RESOLUTION NO. 95 -280 Member Debra Hilstrom introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 12/18/95 -7- RESOLUTION EXPRESSING APPRECIATION AND THANKS TO CAMILLE (CAM) ANDRE, • INTERIM CITY MANAGER The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kristen Mann and passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT A motion by Councilmember Hilstrom and seconded by Councilmember Carmody to adjourn the meeting at 8:25 p.m. passed unanimously. City Clerk Mayor Recorded and transcribed by: Connie Beckman TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial 12/18/95 -8- MEMORANDUM TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Mana er FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk DATE: January 3, 1996 SUBJECT: Resolution Designating Official Newspaper Section 12.01 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter requires the City Council to annually designate a legal newspaper of general circulation in the City as its official newspaper. Minnesota Sun Publications has once again requested the Council to designate the Brooklyn Center Sun -Post to be the official newspaper for 1996. The attached resolution designates the Brooklyn Center Sun -Post as the official newspaper for the City of Brooklyn Center for the year 1996. Attachments: Minnesota Sun Publications Letter Resolution Designating Official Newspaper • • N, MINNESOTA SUN_ PUBLICATIONS Sun-Current Sun-Post Sun-Sailor December 18, 1995 City Council City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Porn:: ay Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Dear Council Members: We would appreciate your designation of the Sun -Post to be your official publication for the year of 1996." The rate structure for legals effective January 1, 1996 will be: 1- column width:. $1.09 per line -first insertion $0.55 per line - subsequent insertions Notarized affidavits on each of your publications will be provided with no additional charge. All notices should reach this office by 2 p.m. the Wednesday preceding publication; however, any legal notice over six pages must be received by 2 p.m. the preceding Tuesday. The best method of sending your legal copy is to transmit, via modem, from your computer. This ensures optimal accuracy and efficiency, and we offer a 10% discount if you choose this procedure. Please contact Assistant Production Manager, Shiela O'Brien at 896 -4744 with questions or to make arrangements. You also c°ar..^..S. -is your co ' on disk and racs,exr a r1i count of Sa/ " In order to expedite our', service to you, please direct your legals to the attention of Meridel Hedblom, Minnesota Sun Publications, 7831 East Bush Lake Road, Bloomington, MN 55439 - 4118. , We appreciate your considering the Sun -Post as your official newspaper for Brooklyn Center in 1996. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to a mutually beneficial working relationship in this coming - year. - Sin . ely, 0 -D ' onald W. Thurlow Publisher DWT /rb Bloomington Office: 7831 East Bush Lake Road Bloomington, PIN 55439 Ph: (612) 896 -4700 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RASQUITION DESIGNATING, OFFTCTAT NFWSPAPFR WHEREAS, Section 12.01 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter and Minn. Stat. 412.831 requires the City Council to annually at its first meeting of the year designate a legal newspaper of general circulation in the city as its official newspaper in which shall be published such ordinances and other matters as are required by law to be so published and such other matters as the council may deem it advisable and in the public interest to have published in this manner; and WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Sun -Post has previously been so designated; and WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Sun -Post meets all necessary requirements for designation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the Brooklyn Center Sun -Post is hereby designated as the official newspaper for the City of Brooklyn Center for the year 1996. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • Council Meeting Date 1/8/96 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Numbe 3 Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES OF CITY FUNDS Department Approval: C � 14 Charlie Hansen, Finance Director Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report y Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Passage of the attached resolution. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached NO ) • In January of each year, the City Council has passed a resolution designating the financial institutions which are authorized as depositories of City funds. Marquette Bank Brookdale is where the City has all of its checking accounts. The first seven institutions listed in section two are where the City has various investment or debt service accounts. No business is currently conducted at Juran & Moody, Inc., but they are listed to provide competitive options for purchasing investments. No business is currently conducted with the last four banks listed in section two, but they are listed because they are local banks and may be used if it is in the City's interest to do so. • requestWepostry. tat 1 J �. • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES OF CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, Section 7.01 of the City Charter provides the City Council with authority over City funds, including the safekeeping and disbursement of public moneys; and WHEREAS, Section 7.10 of the City Charter provides that City funds shall be disbursed by check bearing the actual or facsimile signature of the city manager and the city treasurer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, as follows: 1. that Marquette Bank Brookdale is hereby designated as the depository of the funds of the City of Brooklyn Center. 2. that the following named banks are hereby designated additional depositories to be used for investment purposes: First National Bank of Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Smith Barney Dain Bosworth First Trust Bank of St Paul Norwest Bank Minneapolis American National Bank of St. Paul Juran & Moody, Inc. Firststar Bank of Brooklyn Center Investors Savings Bank of Brooklyn Center Metropolitan Federal Bank FSB of Brooklyn Center Twin City Federal Savings & Loan Association The city treasurer is authorized to deposit City funds guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation and such additional funds not to exceed the amount of 90% of collateral pledged by the depository to the City, and approved by the City. 3. that National Bancard Corporation/First Financial Bank is hereby designated as the clearinghouse depository for credit card sales of the Liquor Stores. RESOLUTION NO. 4. that the city manager, city treasurer, and deputy city treasurer are authorized by the City Council to act for the City in any of its business with the depositories. All checks drawn upon an account of the City shall bear the actual or facsimile signature of the city manager and the city treasurer. 5. that the city manager is Michael J. McCauley, the city treasurer is Charles R. Hansen, and the deputy city treasurer is Timothy R. Johnson. Date Mayor • ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Meeting Date / City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number .Sc� Request For Council Consideration Item Description: TEMPORARY ON -SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE FOR ST. ALPHONSUS CATHOLIC CHURCH Department Approval: Scott Kline, Chief of Police Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this re pi� / Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: The city council consider and approve the request by St. Alphonsus Catholic Church for a temporary on -sale intoxicating liquor license for use at their silent auction/fundraiser to be held at the church hall ® on February 17, 1996. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached St. Alphonsus Catholic Church is sponsoring a silent auction/fundraiser to be held on February 17, 1996. In connection with the fundraiser, St. Alphonsus has made application for a temporary on -sale intoxicating liquor license. St. Alphonsus has received this license for the last several years. They plan to sell beer and wine for consumption on the premises. There have been no problems with this license in the past. • PS-09079 (5,'93) LIC:LM OOKTRO DIVISION M 444 cmu ST -SUITE too L iafety Lit ST- PALL M+ 5 - SION ; 01 (612} 296 -6430 TDD (612) 297 -2100 ;sf APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 to 3 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE TYPE OR PRINT INFORMATION NAME OF ORGANIZATION DATE ORGANIZED NO. OF MEMBERS TAX EXEMPT NUMBER Y STREET ADDRESS v C1T� STATE ZIP CODE i-.t NAME r PERSON MAKING APPLICATION BUSINESS P ONE HOME PHONE 12-) 6,5 - - z- a 1. V_ 1 �.l ' ) s 1 f --74 DATES LIQUOR WILL BE SOLD? (1 TO 3 DAYS) DOES ORGANIZATION HAVE A CHARTER GENERAL PURPOSE OF ORGANIZATION, 1~E_ j a o / Yes C No ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME ADDRESS / 'o ni.:. ! 1 7 0' 17r / 'Jo�'J,{ ni �� .t ?I r✓ ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME ADDRESS ✓' ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME ADDRESS Location where license will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. Will the applicant contract for intoxicating liquor services? If so, give the name and address of the Liquor licensee providing the services. A-10 Will the applicant carry liquor liability insurance? If so, the carrier's name and amount of coverage. (Note: Insurance is not mandatory) e y APPROVAL CITY OF Brooklyn Center DATE APPROVED CITY FEE AMOUNT 825 LICENSE DATES DATE FEE PAID 12/8/95 APPROVED LIQUOR CONTROL DIRECTOR 0 SIGNATURE CITY CLERK NOTE: Do not separate these two parts, send both parts to the address above and the original signed by this division will be returned as the license. Submit to the City Clerk at least 30 days before the event. i i THE CATHOLIC MUTUAL RELIEF SOCIETY 4223 CENTER ST, OMAHA, NE 68105 CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is to certify that the following coverage is in force issued in the name of: ARCHDIOCESE OF ST PAUL - MINNEAPOLIS CHANCERY OFFICE 226 SUMMIT AVENUE ST PAUL, MN 55102 Certificate Number: 8589 Term: 7/01/95 - 7/01/96 Covered Premises: Location /Property ST. ALPHONSUS, 7025 HALIFAX AVE., N BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 -1394 Real Property Personal Property �ductible- Coinsurance Additional CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Protected Person(s) General Liability 500,000 Medical Payments (Combined single limit) (Each person-excluding erson ex lu ( p c ding school students) Excess Liability 1,000,000 COMMENTS: COVER I T GE EX J EN T A m L.4. �..� L�.1 L1�DS 1 0 PARISH xUC.PION �0 BE HELD N 0 PARISH GROUNDS ON FEBRUARY 17, 1996. LIQUOR LIABILITY INCLUDED. In the event of cancellation of this coverage the Society will mail notice thereof-to: CHANCERY OFFICE ST. PAUL, MN Should any of the above described coverages be cancelled before the expiration dates thereof, the carrier will endeavor to mail 30 days written notice to the certificate holder, but failure to mail such_.notice will impose no obligation nor liability upon the Society. �ted at OMAHA, NEBRASKA This 21ST Day of NPVEMBER 1995 BY Form Number K50149 Authorized Representative ENDORSEMENT (O BE ATTACHED TO CERTIFICATE) is Effective Date of Endorsement November 21, 1995 Charge — — — _Credit — — — Certificate Holder A rchdiocese of St. Paul — Minneapolis _ Location St. Paul, MN Certificate No. 8589 of The Catholic Mutual Relief Society is amended as follows: ADDITIONAL PROTECTED PERSON(S) It is understood and agreed that Who is a Protected Person(s) (Section II) is amended to include as a Protected Person(s) the person or organization shown below, but only with respect to liability arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of that part of the designated premises used by the Protected Person(s), and then oniy while the Protected Person(s) is using the described premises. Additional Protected Person(s): City of Brooklyn Center Designated Premises and Use: St. Alphonsus Parish, Brooklyn Center, MN will have a Parish Auction on the parish grounds on February 17, 1996. • ' Authorized h ized Re resent 'v p ati e PKS- 123(1 -89) BROOKE YN CENTER POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICE MEMORANDUM TO: Theresa Eichten, Finance Department FROM: Kim Heiser, Police Department , �Z DATE: December 15, 1995 </ SUBJECT: Temporary On -Sale Liquor Application St. Alphonsus Catholic Church Please deposit the enclosed check, number 7733, in the amount of S25.00, for St. Alphonsus' temporary liquor license for their silent auction/fundraiser. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Thanks. • 4M r � ICHARD W. OR PEGGY A. STEFFEN - 7-7 3 3 S -315- 738 - 866 -162 S -315- 680 -067 -500 fy " - r= :� .�:» 7215 RIVERDALE ROAD ao1 7030 -ar+� MINNEAPOLIS,WN 55430 p p �/ TO TBE f Nf 080E9UF l r�� FIRST BANK MARQUETE AVENUE OFFICE FIRST BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION - _ - - - 90 SOUTH SIXTH STREc_ - MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55402-1110 -. 41 - ----- �:09100002 1: 11038S7704SS11' 7733 \ Council Meeting Date 1/8/96 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number .5 Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: Resolution Establishing Improvement Project No. 1995 -20, Well #5 Annual Maintenance, Accepting Quote and Awarding a Contract Department Approval: Scott Brink, City En veer Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report �� . Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Consider a resolution authorizing establishment of project, acceptance of quotations, and award of contract for well maintenance services. • Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached No ) The City's municipal water supply wells are maintained by Public Utility personnel who provide day -to- day inspections and adjustments required to ensure constant delivery of water to the City. As art f J o q ry ty P the normal well maintenance schedule, the underground portion (column, shaft and pump) of each of �� the City's wells are pulled once every six years for inspection and repair or replacement of components by contractors who specialize in that type of work. The City's Capital Improvement Program recognizes and provides for this annual expenditure g p p through the water utility fund. Well No. 5 is due for inspection and servicing according to the maintenance schedule. The es of g g types servicing and repairs required each year are generally very typical. A standard specification and quotation request is annually prepared and forwarded to contractors that have been proven competent in providing these types of specialized services. Quotations have been received from two (2) separate Contractors. The Contractors were required to submit a base bid for the general maintenance and servicing, along with additional unit costs for specific repair items that may or may not be required upon inspection. The results of the total base bids received are as follows: ALBERG WATER SERVICES, LLC $ 9,700.00 KEYS WELL DRILLING COMPANY $12,100.00 • The unit prices and bids received compare favorably with prices typical for these types of services. It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution providing for the award of well maintenance and repair services to Alberg Water Services, LLC. • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1995 -20, WELL NO. 5 MAINTENANCE, CONTRACT 1995 -1, ACCEPTING QUOTATIONS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR SERVICES WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported to the City Council of the need for routine well maintenance; and WHEREAS, the City does not possess the parts or equipment necessary to perform the more specialized repairs and maintenance services; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has developed plans and specifications for said maintenance, repairs and replacements; and WHEREAS, base quotations have been received from two contractors specializing in providing for these types of services as follows: Alberg Water Services, LLC $ 9,700.00 Keys Well Drilling Company $12,100.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Alberg Water Services, Inc. is hereby authorized to provide inspection, repair, and maintenance services for Well No. 5, City Project 1995 -20, Contract 1995 -I., on the basis of the quotation received. 2. All costs related to this project shall be charged to the Water Utility Fund. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Meeting Date 01/08/96 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number Description: Item Descri P Request For Council Consideration • RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR 1995 DISEASED TREE REMOVAL PROGRAM, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1995 -10, CONTRACT 1995 -C Department Approval: Di ne Spector, D e or of Public Services Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this repo Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: • A resolution accepting work performed and authorizing final payment to Arbor- Design Tree Service, Inc. is attached for Council consideration. Summary Explanation: su ortin documentation attached � PP g ) Improvement Project No. 1995 -10 has been completed by Arbor - Design Tree Service, Inc. The City Council accepted their proposal per Resolution 95 -109 and a contract was subsequently executed. The actual value of work performed is $1,369.10 more than the original contract of $20,830.00 due to more trees being designated for removal than expected. Staff recommends acceptance of the work performed and authorization to make final payment to Arbor - Design Tree Service, Inc. • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR 1995 DISEASED TREE REMOVAL PROGRAM, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1995- 10, CONTRACT 1995 -C WHEREAS, pursuant to written contract signed with the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, Arbor - Design Tree Service, Inc. has satisfactorily completed the following improvement in accordance with said contract: IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1995 -10, 1995 Diseased Tree Removal Program, CONTRACT 1995 -C NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The work completed under said contract is accepted and approved. 2. The actual value of work performed is $1,369.10 more than the original contract value, due to more trees being designated for removal than expected. 3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said contract, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be paid for said improvement under said contract shall be $22,199.10. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • 31 City of Brooklyn Center Licenses to be approved by the City Council on January 8, 1996: COURTESY BENCH U.S. Bench Corporation 3300 Snelling Ave BOWLING ALLEY Beacon Bowl 6525 Lyndale Ave N GASOLINE SERVICE STATION Christy's Auto Service 5300 Dupont Ave N Davies Water Equipment Co. 4010 Lakebreeze Ave N Duke's Mobil 6501 Humboldt Ave N Humboldt Unocal 76 6840 Humboldt Ave N MacMillan Bloedel 4810 N Lilac Dr Neil's Conoco 1505 69th Ave N Osseo- Brooklyn Bus Co. 4435 68th Ave N SuperAmerica Group 6545 West River Road SuperAmerica Group 1901 57th Ave N Total 6830 Brooklyn Blvd Wes' Amoco 6044 Brooklyn Blvd MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Swenson Heating & Air Conditioning 6700 West Broadway • POOL AND BILLIARD TABLES C.D.L. 1317 Jefferson Highway Brooklyn Center Community Center 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy Chi Chi's Inc. 2101 Freeway Blvd PUBLIC DANCE Holiday Inn 2200 Freeway Blvd RENTAL DWELLINGS Initial: Vojoodi Reza Brookdale Manor James Soderberg Melrose Gates Renewal: Egons Podnieks Garden City Court Apartments Biorn and Barbara Carson 6331, 6401 -25 Beard Ave N Jagdish Trivedi 5500 Bryant Ave N Kenneth Pawelk 4201 Lakeside Ave N #206 Sharon Fratzke 4201 Lakeside Ave N #208 Dr. Akbar Sajady 4207 Lakeside Ave N #131 • Dr. Akbar Sajady 4207 Lakeside Ave N #326 Alan and Laurie Knudson 5547 Lyndale Ave N Karen Barton 5127 E Twin Lake Blvd Licenses continued Page 2 • TOBACCO RELATED PRODUCTS Applebee's 1347 Brookdale Center Centerbrook Golf Course 5500 N Lilac Drive Duke's Mobil 6501 Humboldt Ave N Holiday Inn 2200 Freeway Blvd Neil's Conoco 1505 69th Ave N SuperAmerica Group 6545 West River Road SuperAmerica Group 1901 57th Ave N Target 6100 Shingle Creek Pkwy Total 6830 Brooklyn Blvd Value Food Market Inc. 6804 Humboldt Ave N Wes' Amoco 6044 Brooklyn Blvd General Approval: *, � Sharon Knutson, City Clerk Council Meeting Date 1 -08 -96 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Numbe Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 94 -01 regarding Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Concerning the Zoning Classification of Certain Land. Department Ap Ronald A. Warren, Planning and Zoning Specialist Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this rep Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: It is recommended that the City Council, following a scheduled public hearing, adopt the above ordinance amendment which will correct the typographical errors contained in the legal description of a property previously rezoned by the City Council. • Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached ) On December 6, 1993, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center adopted Resolution No. 93 -215 which approved the rezoning of three parcels of land located at the southeast quadrant of TH 252 and 66th Avenue North comprehended under Planning Commission Application No. 93015. This action rezoned two of the parcels from C -2 (Commerce) and one parcel from R -5 (Multiple Family Residence) to C -1 (Service /Office). These parcels were sites of Premier Mechanical (6550 West River Road), the Brookdale Motel (6500 West River Road) and a then 18 unit apartment complex owned by the City of Brooklyn Center (6525, 27, 29 North Willow Lane), which has since been demolished. The City Council at the same meeting had a first reading on a housekeeping ordinance amendment describing the land which had been rezoned using the legal descriptions of the properties and designating them as being in the C -1 (Service /Office) zoning district. This ordinance amendment was subsequently published in the City's official newspaper on December 15, 1993 and adopted as Ordinance No. 94 -01 by the City Council following a public hearing on January 10, 1994 (See copy of Ordinance No. 94 -01 attached). That ordinance amendment contained two typographical errors in the legal description for the Brookdale Motel, 6500 West River Road. One of the errors was the reference to "Lot 15" rather than the proper designation of "Lot 16". The other error was the reference to a distance of "254.53 ft. " rather • than the proper reference of "284.53 ft. ". These errors have been brought to our attention due to negotiations regarding the acquisition of this property by the City. The City Attorney has advised us that these typographical errors should be corrected in our Zoning Ordinance. It should be noted, that there is no doubt that the City Council rezoned this property from C -2 (Commerce) to C -1 (Service /Office) as the record of this fact is quite clear. The proper legal description • was used in the notice of public hearing published in the Brooklyn Center Sun/Post on November 10, 1993 for the Planning Commission's public hearing for this rezoning request (see attached "Notice of Public Hearing "). The typos occurred in preparing this housekeeping ordinance amendment at a later time. This ordinance amendment was approved for first reading on December 11, 1995, was published in the official newspaper on December 20, 1995 and is scheduled for public hearing and possible adoption on January 8, 1996. • • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 8th day of January 1996, at 7 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway to consider an amendment to Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances regarding the zoning classification of certain land. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the Personnel Coordinator at 569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 94 -01 REGARDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES CONCERNING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LAND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended in the following manner: Section 35 -1170 SERVICE /OFFICE DISTRICT (Cl). The following properties are hereby established as being within the (Cl) Service /Office District zoning classification: That part of Lot [15] 16 Auditor's Subdivision No. 310 lying west of a line running from a point in the south line of Lot 16 distant [254.53] 284.53 feet east from the southwest corner thereof to a point in the north line of Lot 16 distant 232 feet east from the northwest corner thereof; except street and highway. Section 2. This Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption and thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of 19 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.) z z z z z z z z z z z z LLJ < a ' < a r c):: ° � zz h co t0 c�0 co co .. ._ ._ ...,.,`, p 7),IoOw go 1 ` N 'Yl AOIIUI t Yl AOIIIA \ �. O r Sl SS 4 U O - ! i• 'N 'V A N IYOH d OIIIA 3 3AI � � y , t4' , I — O C' * •S 'ON 31YQ213AI}! — V < a O� oa syilya _ vl A01IIA ' lyd svnva 11t IS3! ►....----- -.•_.. ` .. •...�' ----^ 014 z Z9Z HI - v x 5114. AVE. N 3AY HLS �y AVE N E i OOL ' N 3AV N30tIYO _ i EN AVE. N. I . A N 3AY N30RYJ 009 s ALDRI — � I N MY FDINOT! N -My IIt/AltB 4' >� BRYANi AVE. N.� x 006 �s N 3AY 1N'/A21a a' l `��• � •N 3AV XYdl00 0001 I �` iF COLFAX AVE. N. _ �� DU RV N 3AY XYJlOO m r i p N V INOdf10 z ('j 0011 DUPONl AVE. N• _ �, (Lj N 3AY INOdf10 A N / 3AY NOSU3► i I � OOZI ( RSGN AVE. N 3AY WS DfR50N !•ii 3AY u prqbj J �) oo I m N 3AY IfaCro ttj ��il1 — N 3AY�IN«13Nd < ❑ � QUYbI • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 10th day of January 1994, at 7 :15 p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway to consider an amendment to Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances regarding the zoning classification of certain land. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the Personnel Coordinator at 569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. 94 -01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING G THE ZONING G CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LAND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended in the following manner: Section 35 -1140. MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R5). e The following properties are hereby established as being within the Residence District zoning classification: (R5) Multiple Family [Lot 1, Block 2, Farr's First Addition.] [That part of Lot 15, Auditor's Subdivision No. 310 lying east of a straight line extension of the west line of Lot I, Block 2, Farr's First Addition, and west of Willow Lane.] [That art of p Lots 5, 6, and 7 Block 1 Olson , s Island View Terrace described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of Lot 6, thence northerly to the southeast corner of the north 25 fee of Lot 7; thence west 100 feet; thence southwesterly to a point in the south line of Lot 5, distant 10 feet west from the southeast corner thereof; thence east to the point of beginning.] Section 35 -1170. SERVICE /OFFICE DISTRICT (Cl). The following properties are hereby established as being within the (Cl) Service/Office District zoning classification: Lots I and 2 Block 1 E and H Properties Addition Lot 1 Block 2 Farr's First Addition • That art o p f Lot 15 Auditors Subdivision No 310 lying west of a line running from ORDINANCE NO. 94_nj a point in the south line of Lot 16 distant 254.53 feet cast from the southwest corner thereof to a point in the north line of Lot 16 distant 232 feet east from the northwest corner thereof• except street and highway. Section 35 -1190 COMMERCE DISTRICT (C2). The following properties are hereby established as being within the (C2) Commerce District zoning classification: [That part of Lot 16, Auditor's Subdivision No. 310 lying west of a line running from a point in the south line of Lot 16 distant 284.53 feet east from the southwest corner thereof to a point in the north line of Lot 16 distant 232 feet east from the northwest est comer thereof; except street and highway.] [That part of Lot 15, Auditor's Subdivision No. 310 lying west of a straight line extension of the west line of Lot 1, Block 2, Farr's First Addition; except highway.] [That part of Lots 4, 5, 6, and 7, Block 1, Olson's Island View Terrace described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 5, thence northerly to the southwest corner of the north 25 feet of Lot 4; thence east to a point 100 feet west from the southeast corner of the north 25 feet of Lot 7; thence southwester) to a point in the south lm Y . e of Lot 5 distant 10 feet west from the southeast corner thereof; west to the point of beginning; except highway.] Section 2. This Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption and thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this - i day of _ 7 , 19 94 Mayor Todd Paulson ATTEST: Clerk Date of Publication December 15, 1993 Effective Date January 14, 19 (Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.) • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER CITY COUNCIL 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway 569 -3330 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please take notice that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center will hold a public hearing on Monday, December 6, 1993, to consider the petition described below. The meeting will begin at 7 :00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway. A definite time for this petition to be considered cannot be given as it will depend on the progression of the agenda items. TYPE OF REQUEST: Rezone PETITIONER: City of Brooklyn Center PROPERTY NAMED IN THE PETITION: Southeast Q H uadrant of T.H. and 66th Avenue North • Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1, E & H Properties Addition Lot 1, Block 2, Farr's First Addition That part of Lot 16, Auditor's Subdivision No. 310 lying west of a line running from a P oint in south line of Lot 16 a distance of 284 53/100 feet esast from southwest corner thereof to a point in the north line of Lot 16 a distance of 232 feet east from the northwest corner thereof existing. BRIEF STATEMENT OF CONTENTS OF PETITION: Request to rezone from C -2 to C -1 the properties addressed as 6500 and 6550 West River Road, and from R -5 to C -1 the property addressed as 6525, 6527, 6529 North Willow Lane. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 569 -3300 to make arrangements. Respectfully, Ronald A. Warren Planning Commission Secretary i Council Meeting Date 1/88/96 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number 1/ o a—� Request For Council Consideration Item Description: Resolution Acknowledging and Congratulating Jenny Whiting as the City of Brooklyn Center Employee of the Quarter, Fourth Quarter 1995, and Congratulating all Fourth Quarter 1995 Nominees Department Approval: 7 11Wl �'7Q� Nancy Gohman, Assistant City Manager /P onnel nato - /TU Manager's Review /Recommendation: 7k&W IY C 9 � No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Pass Resolution Acknowledging and Congratulating Jenny Whiting as the City of Brooklyn Center ® Employee of the Quarter, Fourth Quarter 1995, and Congratulating all Fourth Quarter 1995 Nominees. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached No ) On April 24, 1995, the City Council approved a request by the Employee Action Committee to implement an Employee of the Quarter and Employee of the Year program. On December 14, 1995, Jenny Whiting, public works clerk/technician, was selected Employee of the Quarter by a subcommittee of Employee Action Committee members. For her efforts, Jenny will receive a rotating plaque for her work area, a copy of a resolution, a photo plaque with her name to hang in city hall for the quarter, and recognition in city and community publications. Jenny was also a candidate for Employee of the Year. Other candidates for Fourth Quarter 1995 Employee of the Quarter were Eric Roisum and Larry Hansen. All candidates should be congratulated for their hard work and efforts during the quarter. • ya • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING AND CONGRATULATING JENNY WHITING AS THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER, FOURTH QUARTER 1995, AND CONGRATULATING ALL FOURTH QUARTER NOMINEES WHEREAS, Jenny Whiting was selected Employee of the Quarter, Fourth Quarter 1995, by the Employee Action Committee; and WHEREAS, Eric Roisum and Larry Hansen were also nominated for Employee of the Quarter, Fourth Quarter 1995. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that Jenny Whiting, Eric Roisum and Larry Hansen be acknowledged and congratulated for their hard work and efforts during the quarter. • Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • Council Meeting Date 1 1/ /3/ 99 6 City of Brooklyn Center A genda Item Number o p Request For Council Consideration 0 Item Description: Resolution Acknowledging and Congratulating Bob Cahlander as the 1995 City of Brooklyn Center Employee of the Year Department Approval: Nancy Gohman, A istant Cit Manager /Personnel Coordinator Manager's Review/Recommendation: No comments to supplement this rep � . Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Pass Resolution Acknowledging and Congratulating Bob Cahlander as the 1995 City of Brooklyn Center Employee of the Year. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached No ) On April 24, 1995, the City Council approved a request by the Employee Action Committee to implement an Employee of the Quarter and Employee of the Year program. On December 19, 1995, Interim City Manager Cam Andre selected Bob Cahlander, supervisor of streets /parks, as the 1995 Employee of the Year. Bob celebrated his 41 st year of service with the City of Brooklyn Center in February. For this dedication and commitment he was selected Employee of the Year. • Fb Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING AND CONGRATULATING BOB CAHLANDER AS THE 1995 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER EMPLOYEE OF THE YEAR WHEREAS, Bob Cahlander was selected 1995 Employee of the Year by the interim city manager for his dedication and service to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Bob Cahlander be acknowledged and congratulated for his hard work and efforts during his 41 -plus years with the City. Date Mayor • ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • Coun Meeting Date Iannnry R 1996 31 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Numbcr g G Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: Resolution Acknowledging Gift from the Lions Club of Brooklyn Center for "Entertainment in the Park" Department Approval: arm ��, Arnie Mavis, Recreation Director Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report . Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Approval of Resolution Acknowledging Gift from the Lions Club of Brooklyn Center for "Entertainment • in the Park" Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached ) • Member introduced the following resolution • and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING GIFT FROM THE LIONS CLUB OF BROOKLYN CENTER FOR "ENTERTAINMENT IN THE PARK" WHEREAS, the Lions Club of Brooklyn Center has presented the City a gift of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) and has designated that it be used for "Entertainment In The Park" recreation program; and WHEREAS, the City Council is appreciative of the gift and commends the Lions Club of Brooklyn Center for its civic efforts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, to acknowledge the gift with gratitude and appropriate the gift to the "Entertainment In the Park" recreation program in the amount of $1,500. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk i The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • YJ�E • MEMORANDUM TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk DATE: January 4, 1996 SUBJECT: Council Agenda Items Resolution Expressing Recognition and Appreciation of Barb Kalligher for Her Dedicated Public Service as Councilmember Resolution Expressing Recognition and Appreciation of Members Who Have Served on Commissions I have prepared two resolutions of appreciation and recognition, one for Barb Kalligher and one for commissioners who have recently resigned from commissions. As you requested, I have combined into one recognition resolution a list of those commission members who have resigned. I have attached a sample of a certificate of appreciation which will be plaqued for each individual member and which may be presented to each member at a future Council meeting. • Attachments • O i • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION AND APPRECIATION OF BARB KALLIGHER FOR HER DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE AS COUNCILMF.MRFR WHEREAS, Barb Kalligher served as a member of the Brooklyn Center City Council from 1992 through 1995; and WHEREAS, her service to the City and her consistent leadership have contributed substantially to the sound progress and development of the City; and WHEREAS, her public service and civic effort for the betterment of the community merit the gratitude of the citizens of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, it is highly appropriate that her services and achievements for the betterment of the City should be permanently recognized and expressed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of • Brooklyn Center that Barb Kalligher is hereby presented with this resolution as a visible and lasting expression of gratitude for the leadership and service she has rendered and the benefits she has secured to the citizens of the City of Brooklyn Center. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof. and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION AND APPRECIATION OF MEMBERS WHn HAVF. SERVED ON CITY ADVISORY COMMISSIONS WHEREAS, several citizens have voluntarily served on City Advisory Commissions; and WHEREAS, their public service and civic effort for the betterment of the community merit the gratitude of the citizens of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, their leadership and expertise have been greatly appreciated by the Brooklyn Center Advisory Commissions; and WHEREAS, it is highly appropriate that each member's service to the community should be recognized and expressed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of • Brooklyn Center that the dedicated public service of: Julie Eoloff, Human Rights and Resources Commission Susan Larsen Brown, Human Rights and Resources Commission Beverly Lawrence, NWHHSC Advisory Commission Maria Olek, Housing Commission Vince Opat, Housing Commission is hereby recognized and appreciated by the City of Brooklyn Center and staff is directed to prepare individual certificates of appreciation for each commission member. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: • and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City of Brooklyn Center Certificate of Appreciation presented to: (Name) for dedicated public service on the Commission. Date Mayor Council Meeting Date Q 1/8/96 31City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number U Request For Council Consideration Item Description: Mayoral Appointment: Ad Hoc Communications Task Force Department Approval: Nancy "_G an, Assi tant City Manager /Personnel Coordinator Manager's Review/Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Appoint Colleen Boyce to the ad hoc communications task force. • Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached Yes ) For the last six months, the ad hoc communications task force has had two vacancies. To date, there are six members. Ads recruiting volunteers to serve on the task force have run in the Sun -Post, City Watch, and cable Channel 37. One response was received and that person was appointed. Colleen Boyce attended the Rally Nights in October and participated in group discussion regarding publicity and promotion of the City of Brooklyn Center. Based on this interest, we recruited her application for the task force and, as a result, highly recommend her appointment to the ad hoc communications task force. A copy of Colleen Boyce's application is included with this council request form. • • MEMORANDUM TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk DATE: January 4, 1996 SUBJECT: Council Agenda Item: Select Presiding Officers - Mayor Pro Tem and Acting Mayor Pro Tem Section 2.06 of the City Charter requires the Council to choose from its members a president pro tern who shall hold office at the pleasure of the Council and shall serve as president in the Mayor's absence and as Mayor in case of the Mayor's disability or absence from the City. Also at its November 23, 1992, City Council meeting, the Council passed Resolution No. 92- 262 Establishing and Designating an Acting President Pro Tem of the City Council. The resolution states the most senior Councilmember shall preside in the absence of both the Mayor and Mayor pro tem, and that in the event two or more members have equal seniority, then that member shall preside who received the most votes in their most recent election. Following is a list of councilmembers by seniority. Kristen Mann (elected November 3, 1992, with 6,775 votes) Debra Hilstrom (elected November 8, 1994, with 5,193 votes) Kathleen Carmody (elected November 8, 1994, with 4,201 votes) I would recommend the Council first nominate the Mayor pro tem. Once this is decided, the Council must designate its Acting Mayor pro tem based on seniority. Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution • and moved its adoption: D RESOLUTION NO. 92 -262 o 0 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AND DESIGNATING AN ACTING PRESIDENT PRO TEM OF THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, Section 2.06 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter designates g the Mayor as presiding officer of the City Council and a president pro tem who serves as president in the Mayor's absence; and WHEREAS, the presence of three City Council members at a City Council meeting constitutes a quorum; and WHEREAS, it is possible that both the Mayor and the president pro tem may be absent from such a meeting, consequently leaving no designated presider of the meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide for an acting president pro tem who shall serve in the absence of the Mayor and president pro tem. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the most senior Councilmember shall preside in the absence of both the Mayor and Mayor pro tem. • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in the event two or more members have equal seniority, then that member shall preside who received the most votes in their most recent election. November 23, 1992 Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy C erk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Philip Cohen , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Todd Paulson, Celia Scott, Jerry Pedlar, Dave Rosene, and Philip Cohen; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • Fh • MEMORANDUM TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk DATE: January 4, 1996 SUBJECT: Council Agenda Item: Designate Council Liaisons to City Advisory Commissions The enabling City resolutions for the Financial Commission, Housing Commission, Human Rights and Resources Commission, and Park and Recreation Commission require the Mayor or Councilperson - appointee to serve as an ex officio member of the commission, privileged to speak on any matter but without a vote, and to serve as a liaison between the commission and the City Council. Following is a list of the 1995 Council liaisons to City advisory commissions, boards and committees, the AMM (Association of Metropolitan Municipalities), NMMA (North Metro Mayors Association), and LMC (League of Minnesota Cities). Financial Councilmember Kathleen Carmody • Housing Councilmember Kathleen Carmody Human Rights and Resources Councilmember Debra Hilstrom Park and Recreation Councilmember Kristen Mann Crime Prevention Councilmember Barb Kalligher Drug Task Force Councilmember Barb Kalligher AMM Representative Councilmember Debra Hilstrom NMMA Representative Mayor Myrna Kragness LMC Representative Councilmember Barb Kalligher I would recommend the Council discuss designation of Council liaisons to City advisory commissions, boards, and committees, AMM, NMMA, and LMC for 1996. �l • MEMORANDUM TO: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, b�- o City Jerk C Y DATE: January 4, 1996 SUBJECT: Council Agenda Item: Mayoral Reappointments of City Advisory Commissioners Whose Terms Have Expired On December 31, 1995, several City advisory commissioner's terms expired. The following is a list of members who have expressed interest in reappointment to their respective commissions: Financial Commission Jay Hruska Lawrence Peterson Housing Commission Todd Cannon Lloyd Deuel Amy Gonyea Human Rights and Resources Commission Rhonda Braziel Wayde Lerbs Park and Recreation Commission Art Mead Don Peterson Jill Schendel Planning Commission Donald Booth Mark Holmes Kathryn Palm Also, the City has openings on the following commissions which have been advertised both on cable television and in Brooklyn Center Sun Post and also posted at City Hall and Community Center: Housing Commission - 2 openings Human Rights and Resources Commission - 2 openings • Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council Advisory Commission - 1 opening Charter Commission - 1 opening Ux V MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Myrna Kragness Councilmember Kathleen Carmody Councilmember Debra Hilstrom Councilmember Kristen Mann FROM: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager DATE: January 4, 1996 / SUBJECT: Resolution Declaring Commitment to the Brooklyn Center City Charter, Pledging Fair Treatment of Employees, Declaring Against Conflicts of Interest and Misuse of Positions On June 22, 1992, Resolution No. 92 -149 was adopted by the City Council. The resolution directs the City Manager to place it for readoption on the agenda for the first meeting of the City Council each January as information and reminder of Council/Manager responsibilities. • • n J • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING COMMITMENT TO THE BROOKLYN CENTER CITY CHARTER, PLEDGING FAIR TREATMENT OF EMPLOYEES, DECLARING AGAINST CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND MISUSE OF POSITIONS WHEREAS, Brooklyn Center voters in 1966 adopted a City Charter creating a Council/Manager form of government; and WHEREAS, said Charter provides that the City Council shall determine all matters of policy, and the City Manager shall be the head of the administrative branch of the City Government; and WHEREAS, the Charter provides that there be no separate administrative boards or commission other than advisory boards and commissions; and WHEREAS numerous u Brous ommissions have served the City since adoption advisory tY P • of the Charter; and WHEREAS, the Charter provides for four Council members and a Mayor, all elected at large, with the Mayor entitled to a single vote as other Council members and who in addition serves as presiding officer of the Council and as official head of the City for ceremonial purposes; and WHEREAS, the Charter provides that "the Mayor shall study the operations of the City government and shall report to the Council any neglect, dereliction of duty, or waste on the part of any officer or department of the City; and WHEREAS, the Charter provides that "the Council and the City Manager, or either of them, and any officer formally authorized by them, or either of them, shall have power to make investigations into the City's affairs, to subpoena witnesses, administer oaths, and compel the production of books and papers"; and WHEREAS, the Charter provides that the City Manager shall control and direct all departments and divisions of the City and shall have the right to take part in Council discussion and shall recommend such measures as deemed necessary; and WHEREAS, the Charter prohibits Council members from dictating the appointment of any person to office or employment by the City Manager except as provided in Chapter 6 of this Charter; and RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Charter requires the Council to deal with and control the administrative service solely through the City Manager and prohibits any Council member from giving orders to any subordinate of the City Manager, either publicly or privately; and WHEREAS, the City Manager is charged by the Charter to see that the City Charter and the laws and resolutions of the City are enforced; and WHEREAS, the Council as a whole also has an obligation to police its own conduct and to ensure that its business is conducted pursuant to the City Charter and the norms of acceptable and courteous business behavior; and WHEREAS, Council members must depend upon the City Manager and staff to provide them with a great amount of background information, data, and expertise to aid in deliberating issues, developing policy, and administering the Council's responsibilities; and WHEREAS, the effectiveness of the services provided by the staff is in large part determined by a relationship of trust and mutual respect between the staff and the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council: 1. To rededicate itself to the spirit and letter of the City Charter, and to call to account any of its members who ignore the spirit and letter of the City Charter. 2. To rededicate itself to the checks and balances of the City Charter that keep City government accountable and to reaffirm its commitment to the first amendment rights of the U.S. Constitution. 3. To pledge that no employees suffer recriminations, abuse or humiliation for acting in a forthright, proper, honest, and candid manner in performing their responsibilities. 4. To discharge its responsibilities as intended and established by federal, state, and local laws and the City Charter, and to do so in a fair and impartial manner. Any City officials or employees, elected or appointed, who engage in conflict of interest or who use their positions in a self - serving manner, having the effect of promoting their own financial interest or the financial interest of a friend, associate, business employer, or relative instead of the public interest, shall be subject to censure by the City Council. RESOLUTION NO. 5. To direct the City Manager to place this resolution for readoption on the agenda for the first meeting of the City Council each January hereafter, as information and reminder of Council /Manager responsibilities. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption f h r o the foregoing oin resolution was duly econded b member P g g Y Y and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Meeting Date 1/8/96 3 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number FK Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: 1996 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Department Approval: Diane Spector, Director o blic Services Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this repo Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: A resolution approving the 1996 Capital Improvement Program is attached for consideration. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached Yes ) • The Council has a number of times reviewed draft versions of the Capital Improvement Program CIP P P g (CIP) for 1996. The 1996 CIP covers the years 1996 -2005, with 1995 included for reference. The CIP is approved by resolution. • adoption: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the financial policies of the City Council require that an annual Capital Improvement Program be developed and approved; and WHEREAS, the proposed 1996 Capital Improvement Program, planning for the years 1996 -2005, has been developed and reviewed staff and appropriate citizen commissions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that the 1996 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is hereby approved. Date Mavor • ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1��96 Can'pt-tal imp rovement Pro g ram a I O i I City of Brooklyn Center January, 1996 ! IL TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION........................... ............................... 1 -2 • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM A. Infrastructure WaterUtility .................... ............................... 10 Sanitary Sewer Utility .............. ............................... 10 Storm Drainage Utility .............. ............................... 11 Sidewalks and Trails 11 Parks and Recreation ............... ............................... 12 Streets.......................... .............................13 B. Facilities and Equipment Government Buildings .............. ............................... 13 Data Processing .................. ............................... 14 Vehicles and Equipment ............. ............................... 14 C. Community Development Economic Development ............. ............................... 15 Housing......................... .............................15 TABLES Table 1: Summary By Functional Area . ............................... 3 Table 2: Summary By Fund ........ ............................... 5 Table 3: Cash Balance Analysis .... ............................... 7 -8 Table 4: Summary By Function and Fund .............................. 9 FIGURES Figure 1: CIP, 1995 -2004, By Functional Area ........................... 4 Figure 2: CIP, 1995 -2004, By Funding Source ........................... 6 APPENDIX A Capital Improvements Fund Expenditure Policy DETAILED SCHEDULES OF IMPROVEMENTS Table A: Water Utility Capital Improvements Table B: Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvements Table C: Storm Sewer Utility Capital Improvements Table D: Sidewalk and Trail Improvements Table E: Park Improvements Table F: Public Building Improvements Table G: Street Improvements Table H: Equipment Table I: Central Garage Vehicles and Equipment Table J: Community Development 1996 -2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM INTRODUCTION The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a planning document. It is intended to serve as a summary of the physical improvements proposed to carry out the City's strategic and comprehensive plans. The CIP presents a schedule of improvements and an evaluation of the community's financial capabilities, as well as its goals and priorities. In such a way, the community can be assured that it is adequately prepared to meet the demands on its financial resources in the coming years. No document or planning process, however, can anticipate all contingencies or opportunities. Certainly not all of the capital improvements to be undertaken during this time period are known at this time. Rather, the information contained in these tables represents a best estimate based on present knowledge and expected conditions. The CIP is a flexible planning tool that provides a means to determine which projects are of highest priority. The City can be responsive to opportunities because it has available a comprehensive listing of its needs which can be evaluated and reprioritized if necessary to take into account new or changing situations. For the purposes of this report, a capital improvement can be defined as any major non - recurring expenditure or any expenditure for physical facilities of government. Typical expenditures are the cost of land acquisition or interest in land, construction of buildings or other structures; construction of roads, utilities, or park improvements; and acquisition of vehicles and data processing and other equipment. Most capital improvements are typically funded from revenue sources other than the • general fund. Maintenance of these improvements is primarily funded by the general fund. The CIP is directly linked to the goals and policies, land use and community facility sections of the Comprehensive Plan, since these sections indicate general policies of development, redevelopment, and the maintenance of the community. Consequently, the primary objective of the CIP is to integrate the specific goals, policies, and recommendations contained in the City's plan with its capability to pay for and maintain capital improvements. Meeting Strategic Goals The City's Comprehensive Plan, which will be updated during 1996, presents the framework for programming, development and redevelopment within the community. Two special studies have been conducted to discuss issues and trends, and serve as strategic guideposts. These studies are Year 2000 Committee Report. conducted in 1984 -85, and the Discover the Center rally nights, which were conducted in Fall, 1995. The Year 2000 report was prepared by an ad hoc task force of citizens and citizen commission members. The Discover the Center rally nights were attended by a changing group of citizens and business people. Both these studies came to similar conclusions. The strategic goals which should serve as a focus both for programming and for capital improvements are these: • City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1996 -2005 Page 1 • Maintaining a high quality of life and building neighborhood connections • Investing in redevelopment and growth within the constraints of local economic conditions • • Being responsive to changing demographics and bridging differences • Promoting an informed and involved public • Reducing and preventing crime • Monitoring he physical environment g lronm nt and addressing public health and safety P Y gP Y issues • Maintaining a continuous review of the appropriateness of city services and their funding CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 1996 -2005 As detailed in the CIP, the major projects contemplated over the course of the next ten years include: • The continuation of a systematic program of neighborhood street and utility improvement projects designed to upgrade neighborhood infrastructure and improve the appearance of Brooklyn Center neighborhoods; • Investment of considerable funding into scattered site housing replacements, both single family and multiple family, and expansion of housing rehabilitation loans, to maintain and improve the City's stock of affordable housing; • A focus on the redevelopment of mature commercial sites, including the acquisition and clearance o ro erties to of properties p combine into new sates for development; and • The upgrade of community public safety facilities, including possible expansion of the police • station and the two .f re halls. These major projects focus on maintaining a high quality of life and neighborhood focus and on redeveloping the community. In addition, other projects such as park upgrades, vehicle and equipment replacements, arterial and collector street rehabilitations, and utility system maintenance and repairs provide for the continuation of the high level of public services which Brooklyn Center has come to expect and to enjoy. The detailed tables of proposed improvement projects are organized by functional area -- in other words, water system improvements, park upgrades, street projects, etc. The CIP begins with a series of summary tables and graphs showing the overall level of expected need and funding requirements. A summa of the proposed osed ca ital improvements summary nts b functional area for the ten year P P P P Y period of 1996 Y P through 2005 is shown in Table 1. A summary by funding source is shown in Table 2. Table 3 shows the effect the proposed capital outlays would have on some of the various sources of funding available to a for them. All costs shown are based on 1995 estimated costs with t to p ay no adjustment ment for inflation. It must be understood that the scheduling of various improvements, especially those that are related to development or redevelopment, can change substantially from year to year. However, the overall level of improvements shown in this CIP represents the best judgment of what is necessary to maintain infrastructure in good condition, and to provide those facilities which are necessary to support public services (public safety, park and recreation, senior programs, etc.) through the year 2005. • I City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1996 -2005 Page 2 • TABLE 1 - Capital Improvement Pr"m - Summary by Functional Area • "Where The Fun uld Be Spent" 8- an -9 0 J 6 PUBLIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS: Water Utility Capital Projects 165,780 500,000 705,000 1,025,000 385,000 205,000 5,325,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Capital Projects 982,300 1,250,000 425,000 300,000 495,000 250,000 1,250,000 Storm Drainage Utility Capital Projects 1,775,000 3,600,000 510,000 250,000 350,000 375,000 1,875,000 SUBTOTAL $2,923,080 $5,350,000 $1,640,000 $1,575,000 $1,230,000 $830,000 $8,450,000 SIDEWALK/TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS: Off - Street Trails 0 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 On- Street Trails 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 Sidewalks 75,000 25,000 85,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 SUBTOTAL $75,000 $35,000 $220,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $175,000 PARK IMPROVEMENTS $72,700 $269,200 $3,314,900 $4,200,000 $0 $0 $0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $2,950,000 $950,000 $6,200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $250,000 $1,250,000 PUBLIC BUILDINGS $50,000 $500,000 $12,355,000 $0 $0 $0 $750,000 STREET IMPROVEMENTS: Sealcoating 120,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Signals 0 0 275,000 0 0 0 0 State Aid Street Projects 593,480 4,062,000 0 953,000 378,000 1,002,000 270,000 Other Street Projects 988,500 630,000 1,900,205 540,000 40,000 50,000 280,000 Landscaping 0 0 170,000 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL $1,701,980 $4,792,000 $2,445,205 $1,593,000 $518,000 $1,152,000 $1,050,000 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT: Data Processing 118,030 67,555 455,000 100,000 90,000 140,000 550,000 Other Equipment 390,000 475,000 1,010,000 250,000 0 0 0 City Vehicles 367,700 675,440 980,600 447,000 278,200 360,000 1,166,800 SUBTOTAL $875,730 $1,217,995 $2,445,600 $797,000 $368,200 $500,000 $1,716 GRAND TOTAL $8,648,490 $13,114,195 $28,620,705 $8,400,000 $2,351,200 $2,767,000 $13,391,800 TABLE 1 - Capital Improvement Program - Summary by Functional Area "Where The Funds Would Be Spent" 4 -Jan- ........:.::.::::.: a: aa:: ::::.:::::::.:::::::::.::::::9a PUBLIC UTILITY IMP VEMENTS: Water Utility Capital Proj s 165,780 500,000 705,000 1,025,000 385,000 205,000 5,325,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Capita rojects 982,300 1,250,000 425,000 300,000 495,000 250,000 1,250,000 Storm Drainage Utility Capital Pr ' cts 1,775,000 3,600,000 510,000 250,000 350,000 375,000 1,875,000 SUB TAL $2,923,080 $5,350,000 $1,640,000 $1,575,000 $1,230,000 $830,000 8, 450,000 SIDEWALKITRAIL IMPROVEMENTS: Off - Street Trails 0 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 On- Street Trails 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 10 10,000 50,000 Sidewalks 75,000 25,000 85,000 25,000 5,000 25,000 125,000 SUBTOTAL ,000 $35,000 $220,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,0001 $175,000 PARK IMPROVEMENTS $72,704 $269,200 $3,314,900 $4,20 $0 $0 $0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $2,950,000 $950,000 $6,200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $250,000 $1,250,000 PUBLIC BUILDINGS $50,000 $5000Q0 $1 .000 $0 $0 $0 $750,000 STREET IMPROVEMENTS: Sealcoating 120,000 100,' 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Signals 0 0 '275,000 0 0 0 0 State Aid Street Projects 593,480 ' "4,062,000 I e M 953,000 378,000 1,002,000 270,000 Other Street Projects 988,500 ' { 630,000 1,900,205 I } 540,000 40,000 50,000 280,000 Landscaping 0 0 170,000 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL $1,701,,960 $4,792,000 $2,445,205 593,000 $518,000 $1,152,000 $1,050,000 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT: Data Processing 118,030 97,000 455,000 100,000 90,000 140,000 550,000 Other Equipment 390,000 485,000 1,000,000 250,000 0 0 City Vehicles 367,700 675,440 980,600 447,000 78,200 1 360,000 1,166,800 SUBT AL $875,730 $1,257,440 $2,435,600 $797,000 $36 0 $500,000 $1,716,800 G D TOTAL $8,648,490 $13,153,640 $28,610,705 $8,400,000 $2,351,200 $2,767, $13,391,800 City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program, 1996 -2005 By Functional Area x Other Street Improvements iNater State Aid Streets 7% 12% 10% Sanitary Sewer 6% Community Development Storm Drainage 13% 10% Trails & Sidewalks 1% Capital Equipment 10% Public Buildings Park Improvements 20 % 11 %'' Total Proposed = $68,674,345 City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program, 1996 -2005 By Functional Area Other Street Improvements Water State Aid Streets 7% 12 % 10% Sanitary Sewer 6% Community Development Storm Drainage 13% 10% Trails & Sidewalks 3 q g 1% T Capital Equipment 10% Public Buildings Park Improvements 20% 11% Total Proposed = $68,644,900 TABLE 2 - Capital Improvem*Program - Summary by Fund "Where the Funds Would Come From" 08-jan-96 WATER UTILITY $220,780 $942,000 $1,307,125 $1,345,000 $395,000 $300,000 $5,342,000 SANITARY SEWER UTILITY $1,005,170 $1,284,000 $527,125 $334,000 $546,000 $255,000 $1,284,000 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY $1,655,170 $1,090,000 $697,150 $260,000 $350,000 $375,000 $1,875,000 MSA-REGULAR ACCOUNT #1496 $362,340 $2,865,000 $174,025 $628,000 $269,000 $596,000 $172,000 MSA - LOCAL ACCOUNT #2900/11 $207,900 $489,000 $1,052,030 $93,000 $36,000 $231,000 $368,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $538,000 $3,482,000 $512,500 $333,000 $77,000 $150,000 $84,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND $512,700 $465,000 $1,647,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 GOLF COURSE FUND $26,100 $15,640 $160,100 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 LIQUOR STORE FUND $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CENTRAL GARAGE FUND $286,600 $534,800 $696,600 $447,000 $278,200 $360,000 $1,166,800 EDA LEVY $21,900 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 TIF FUNDS $2,800,000 $1,300,000 $6,393,750 $150,000 $0 $0 $750,000 CDBG FUNDS $75,000 $75,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $125,000 $625,000 HERITAGE CENTER REVENUE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 OTHER FUNDS $75,000 $75,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $125,000 $625,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS $645,700 $125,000 $14,551,800 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 GENERAL FUND $216,130 $181,755 $351,000 $210,000 $200,000 $250,000 $1,100,000 OTHER GOVERNMENTS $0 $190,000 $300,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $8,648,490 $13,114,195 $28,620,705 $8,400,000 $2,351,200 $2,767,000 $13,391,800 TABLE 2 - Capital Improvement Program - Summary by Fund "Where the Funds Would Come From" 04- Jan -96 :.:...:..:..:::::::::::.::::..:::::::.:.::.. 9::............................ 19..::::::::.:::::.::::::::::: 1: �J$. ::.::..:::......:.............. . .. ... ..:...:..::::::::::::.. WATER UTIL $220,780 $942,000 $1,307,125 $1,345,000 $395,000 300,000 $5,342,000 SANITARY SEWER`UTILITY $1,005,170 $1,284,000 $527,125 $334,000 $546 $255,000 $1,284,000 STORM DRAINAGE UTIL� $1,655,170 $1,090,000 $697,150 $260,000 ,_;$350,000 $375,000 $1,875,000 MSA- REGULAR ACCOUNT #1496 \ , \\ F $362,340 $2,865,000 $174,025 $628;000 $269,000 $596,000 $172,000 MSA - LOCAL ACCOUNT #2900/11 \ i007,900 $489,000 $1,052,030 .;.y l $93,000 $36,000 $231,000 $368,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $538,000 . $3,482,000 $512,500,. $333,000 $77,000 $150,000 $84,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND $512,700 ``$465,000 $1,64T,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 GOLF COURSE FUND $26,100 $15,640 " $160,100 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 LIQUOR STORE FUND $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CENTRAL GARAGE FUND $286,600 $534,800 $696,60'G $447,000 $278,200 $360,000 $1,166,800 EDA LEVY $21,904 , $0 $50,000 ` :. $0 $0 $0 $0 y- TIF FUNDS $2,000,000 $1,300,000 $6,393,750 $150,000 $0 $0 $750,000 CDBG FUNDS $75,000 $75,000 $100,000 $100,000 `'` $,100,000 $125,000 $625,000 HERITAGE CENTER REVENUE y'�y $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 OTHER FUNDS $75,000 $75,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $125,000 $625,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS $645,700 $125,000 $14,551,800 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 GENERAL FUND $216,130 $221,200 $341,000 $210,000 $200,000 $250,000 $1,100,000 OTHER GOVERNMENTS $0 $190,000 $300,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $8,648,490 $13,153,640 $28,610,705 $8,400,000 $2,351,200 $2,767,000 $13,391,800 i -- -- City f Br - -- y Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program, 1965 -2005 By Funding Source General Fund Water Utilit y Other Funds G 3 /° 13% 19% Sanitary Sewer Utility 7% Storm Drainage Utility 8% Other Enterprise Funds 5% Capital Improvements Fund ~ 3% MSA Regular Special Assessments 7% 7 % M Local oca I 3% GO Bonds 25% Total Proposed = $68,674,345 i � • City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program, 1965 -2005 By Funding Source General Fund Water Utilit Other Funds 19% Sanitary Sewer Utility 7% Other Enterprise Funds Storm Drainage Utility 5% 8% Capital Improvements Fund 3 /0 o M 9 SA Regular Special Assessments p 7 0 7% MSA Local 3% GO Bonds 25% Total Proposed = $68,644,900 TABLE 3 - Capital Improvement Program - Cash Balance Analysis "Can We Afford To Make These Capital Outlays" to 08 -Jan- 9 6 Balance Jan 1 $4,755,150 $5,098,395 $4,697,555 $3,935,675 $3,132,225 Revenues Investment Interest 270,000 240,000 .220,000 200,000 160,000 User Fees 1,032,000 1,032,000 1,080,000 1,128,000 1,128,000 Bond Proceeds Other 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 35,000 Expenditures Capital Outlays 220,780 942,000 1,307,125 1,345,000 395,000 Debt Service Operating Costs 807,975 800,840 824,755 856,450 882,140 Balance Dec 31 $5,098,395 $4,697,555 $3,935,675 $3,132,225 $3,178,085 Balance Jan 1 $3,419,200 $3,163,975 $2,496,450 $2,572,840 $2,904,545 Revenues Investment Interest 215,410 183,500 150,000 150,000 150,000 User Fees 2,237,415 2,237,415 2,326,185 2,463,160 2,537,050 Other 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Expenditures Capital Outlays 1,005,170 1,284,000 527,125 334,000 546,000 Operating Costs 362,580 373,780 384,745 399,975 411,970 Debt Service MCWS Charge 1,341,300 1,431,660 1,488,925 1,548,480 1,594,930 Balance Dec 31 $3,163,975 $2,496,450 $2,572,840 $2,904,545 $3,039,695 Balance Jan 1 $2,019,250 $885,130 $279,415 $52,670 $282,150 Revenues Investment Interest 22,675 28,000 15,000 12,000 12,000 User Fees 780,000 832,000 858,000 884,000 884,000 Other Expenditures Capital Outlays 1,655,170 1,090,000 697,150 260,000 350,000 Operating Costs 141,500 116,780 111,000 113,000 115,000 Debt Service 90,625 198,815 241,595 243,520 244,000 Management Costs 49,500 60,120 50,000 50,000 50,000 Balance Dec 31 $885,130 $279,415 $52,670 $282,150 $419,150 TABLE 3 - Capital Improvement Program - Cash Balance Analysis "Can We Afford To Make These Capital Outlays" 04 Jan - 969 .............. 9 ?.....:.........�$....... .:. 19 .................... ............................... alance Jan 1 $4,755,150 $5,127,975 $4,781,88 $4,050,005 $3,296,555 Revenues Investment Interest 299,580 294,750 250,000 250,000 250,000 User Fees 1,032,000 1,032,000 1;`080,000 1,128,000 1,128,000 Bond Proceeds Other 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 35,000 Expenditures. Capital Outlays 220,780 942,000 1,307,125 1,345,000 395,000 Debt Service Operating Costs 801,975 800,840 824,755 856,450 882,140 Balance Dec 31 $5,127,975 $4,781,885 $4,050,005 $3,296,555 $3,432,415 Will Balance Jan 1 $3,419,200 $3 $2,496,450 $2,625,965 $3,007,670 Revenues Investment Interest 215,410 183,500 203,125 200,000 200,000 User Fees 2,237,415 2,237,415 2,326,185 2,463,160 2,537,050 Other 1,000 1,006,, 1,000 1,000 1,000 Expenditures Capital Outlays 1,005,170 1,284,000 ' 527,125 334,000 546,000 Operating Costs 362,580 373,780, 384,745 399,975 411,970 Debt Service MCWS Charge 1,341,300 1,431,660 1,48&,,925 1,548,480 1,594,930 Balance Dec 31 $3,163,975 $2,496,450 $2,625,5 $3,007,670 $3,192,820 Balance Jan 1 $2,019,250 $885,130 $368,615 x $170,670 $400,150 Revenues Investment Interest 22,675 117,200 43,800 \12,000 12,000 User Fees 780,000 832,000 858,000 88` 000 884,000 Other Expenditures ' Capital Outlays 1,655,170 1,090,000 697,150 260,000 350,000 Operating Costs 141 500 116 780 111 P 000 113 115,000 Debt Service 90,625 198,815 241,595 243,520 244,000 Management Nosts 49,500 60,120 50,000 50,000 50,000 Balance Dec 31 $885,130 $368,615 $170,670 $400,150 $5 ,150 • TABLE 3 - Capital Improvement Program - Cash Balance Analysis "Can We Afford To Make These Capital Outlays" 98 9 - 7.!:; . 'Ii 04-Jan-96 99 9 - . ............ A Balance Jan 1 $1,472,775 $1,564,110 ($84178,7) ($571,376) ($747,854) Revenues 3 0,000 Intergovernmental 850,000 850,000 8 000 850,000 1,023,000 Expenditures Capital Outlays* 362,340 2,865,000 174,025 I" x ^ 628,000 269,000 Transfers to Other Funds 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 75,000 Debt Service 306,325 307,873 308,588 308,478 307,560 Balance Dec 31* $1,564,110 ($848,763)F ($571,376) ($747,854) ($376,414) -Al ... .................... ...... .... .. .. .. ....... .. -A Balance Jan 1 $2,629,000 $2,552,550 $2,191,178 $1,248,706 $1,218,142 Revenues Investment Interest 131,450 127,628 109,559 62,435 60,907 Other Expenditures Capital Outlays 207,900 489,000 1,052,030 93,000 36,000 Other Balance Dec 31 $2,552,550 $2,191,178 $1,248,706 $1,218,142 $1,243,0 . . . .. ... Balance Jan 1 $5,164,900 $4, 1 858,600 $4,767,440 $3,486,920 $3,779,300 Revenues Investment Interest 206,400 3731140 366,980 292,380 304,890 Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 Expenditures Capital Outlays 512,700 465,000 1,647,500 0 0 Debt Service Balance Dec 31 $4,858,600 $4,767,440 $3,486,920 $3,779,300 $4,084,190 Some part of the 69th Avenue bridge project is eligible for federal funding. That amount is not known at this time, the total cost is shown as being funded by the regular state aid fund. It is not an I ticipated that the fund will actually outspend its balance. In addition;` final project costs have not yet been determined for some 1994/1995 projects. TABLE 3 - Capital Improvement Program - Cash Balance Analysis "Can We Afford To Make These Capital Outlays" 08-Jan- Balance Jan 1 $1,472,775 $1,564,110 ($848,763) ($571,376) ($747,854) Revenues Intergovernmental 850,000 850,000 850,000 850,000 850,000 Expenditures Capital Outlays* 362,340 2,865,000 174,025 628,000 269,000 Transfers to Other Funds 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 75,000 Debt Service 306,325 307,873 308,588 308,478 307,560 Balance Dec 31* $1,564,110 ($848,763) ($571,376) ($747,854) ($549,414) S. :.:..::.:. 60: Balance Jan 1 $2,629,000 $2,552,550 $2,191,178 $1,248,706 $1,218,142 Revenues Investment Interest 131,450 127,628 109,559 62,435 60,907 Other Expenditures Capital Outlays 207,900 489,000 1,052,030 93,000 36,000 Other nce Dec 31 $2,552,550 $2,191,178 $1,248,706 $1,218,142 $1,243,049 Balance Jan 1 $5,051,300 $4,858,600 $4,693,600 $3,326,100 $3,576,100 Revenues Investment Interest 320,000 300,000 280,000 250,000 260,000 Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 Expenditures Capital Outlays 512,700 465,000 1,647,500 0 0 Debt Service Balance Dec 31 $4,858,600 $4,693,600 $3,326,100 $3,576,100 $3,836,100 * Some part of the 69th Avenue bridge project is eligible for federal funding. That amount is not known at this time, the total cost is shown as being funded by the regular state aid fund. It is not anticipated that the fund will actually outspend its balance. In addition, final project costs have not yet been determined for some 1994/1995 projects. TABLE 4 - Capital Improvement Program - Summary By Function q4 ' Fund 04- _„' - ss:: ><:>:.><aov�z.. : : :. ..:::: .2W�.:�n� .;.: _IC UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS: Water Utility 165,780 500,000 705,000 1,025,000 z =`' 385,000 205,000 5,325,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility 982,300 1,250,000 425,000 300,000 495,000 250,000 1,250,000 Stone Drainage Utility 1,775,000 500,000 510,000 250,000 350,000 375,000 1,875,000 Special Assessments/Other 3,100,000 SUBTOTAL $2,923,080 $5,350,000 $1,640,000 $1,575,000 $1,230,000 $830,000 $8,450,000 SIDEWALK/TRAIL IMPROVEMENT TRAILS State Aid - Local Accounts #2911/#2900 0 10,000 135,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 SIDEWALKS State Aid - Local Accounts #2911!#2900 75,000 25,000 85,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 SUBTOTAL $75,000 $35,000 $220,000 $35,000 $3 $35,000 $175,000 PARKIMPROVEMENTS Capital Projects Fund 72,700 265,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 General Fund 0 4,200 101,000 0 0 0 0 Golf Course Fund 0 0 132,100 200,000 0 0 0 Stone Drainage Utility 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GO Bonds 0 0 2,981,800 4,000,000 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL $72,700 $269.200 $3,314,900 $4,200,000 $0 $0 $0 PUBLIC BUILDINGS General Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Improvements Fund 50,000 0 792,500 0 0 0 0 Water Utility 0 0 81,250 0 0 0 0 Sanitary Sewer Utility 0 0 81,250 0 0 0 0 TIF 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 750,000 GO Bonds 0 0 11,400,000 0 0 0 0 STREET IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $50,000 $500,000 $12,355,000 $0 $0 $0 $750,000 MSA - Regular #1496 362,340 2,865,000 174,025 628,000 269,000 596,000 172,000 MSA - Local #2911/#2900 132,900 464,000 842,030 68,000 11,000 206,000 243,000 Water Utility 0 167,000 10,875 70,000 10,000 95,000 17,000 O ry Sewer Utility 22,870 34,000 10,875 34,000 51,000 5,000 34,000 Drainage Utility 40,170 590,000 101,150 10,000 0 0 0 peckall Assessments 378,000 382,000 512,$00 333,000 77,000 150,000 84,000 GO Bonds 645,700 0 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund 120,000 100,000 100,00d> 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 TIF Revenue 0 0 393,750 ':. 150,000 0 0 0 Other Governments 0 190,000 300,000 200,000 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL $1,701,980 $4,792,000 $2,445,205 $1,593,000 $518,000 $1,152,000 $1,050,000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CDBG 75,000 75,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 125,000 625,000 EDA Levy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TIF Revenue 2,800,000 800,000 6,000,000 0 0 0 0 Other Funds 76,000 75,000 100,000 }00,000 100,000 125,000 625,000 SUBTOTAL $2,950,000 $950,000 $6,200,000 $2 ,000 $200,000 $ 250,00 0 $1, 250,000 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT: DATA PROCESSING General Fund 96,130 97,000 200,000 100,004 90,000 140,000 550,000 Other Funds 21,900 0 255,000 0 0 0 0 OTHER EQUIPMENT_ General Fund 0 10,000 0 0 4 0 0 0 Heritage Center Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Improvements Fund 390,000 200,000 750,000 0 0 0 0 Water Utility 275,000 250,000 250,000" CENTRAL GARAGE VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT :I' Central Garage Fund 286,600 534,800 696,600 447,000 78,200 360,000 1,166,800 Golf Course Fund 26,100 15,640 28,000 0 0 0 0 GO Bonds 0 125,000 170,000 0 0 0 0 Water Utility 55,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sanitary Sewer Utility 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storm Drainage Utility 0 0 86,000 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL $875,730 $1,257,440 $2,435,600 $797,000 $368,260 $500,000 $1,716,800 GRAND' $8,648,490 $13,153,640 $28,610,705 $8,400,000 $2,351,200 $2,767,000 $13,391,800 TABLE 4 - Capital Improvement Program - Summary By Function and Fund 04- ,499fr:,.< 1997: C UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Water Utility 165,780 500,000 705,000 1,025,000 385,000 205,000 5,325,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility 982,300 1,250,000 425,000 300,000 495,000 250,000 1,250,000 Storm Drainage Utility 1,775,000 500,000 510,000 250,000 350,000 375,000 1,875,000 Special Assessments /Other 3,100,000 SUBTOTAL $2,923,080 $5,350,000 $1,640,000 $1,575,000 $1,230,000 $830,000 $8,450,000 SIDEWALK/TRAIL IMPROVEMENT TRAILS State Aid - Local Accounts #29111#2900 0 10,000 135,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 SIDEWALKS State Aid - Local Accounts #2911/#2900 75,000 25,000 85,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 SUBTOTAL $75,000 $35,000 $220,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $175,000 PARK IMPIR MENTS Capital Projects Fund 72,700 265,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 General Fund 0 4,200 101,000 0 0 0 0 Golf Course Fund 0 0 132,100 200,000 0 0 0 Storm Drainage Utility 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GO Bonds 0 0 2,981,800 4,000,000 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL $72,700 $269,200 $3.314,900 1 $4,200,000 $0 I $0 1 $0 PUBLIC BUILDINGS General Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Improvements Fund 50,000 0 792,500 0 0 0 0 Water Utility 0 0 81,250 0 0 0 0 Sanitary Sewer Utility 0 0 81,250 0 0 0 0 TIF 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 750,000 GO Bonds 0 0 11,400,000 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL $50,000 $500,000 $12,355,000 $0 $0 $0 $750.000 STREET IMP ROVEMENTS MSA- Regular #1496 362,340 2,865,000 174,025 628,000 269,000 596,000 172,000 MSA - Local #2911/#2900 132,900 464,000 842,030 68,000 11,000 206,000 243,000 Water Utility 0 167,000 10,875 70,000 10,000 95,000 17,000 ry Sewer Utility 22,870 34,000 10,875 34,000 51,000 5,000 34,000 Drainage Utility 40,170 590,000 101,150 10,000 0 0 0 Special Assessments 378,000 382,000 512,500 333,000 77,000 150,000 84,000 GO Bonds 645,700 0 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund 120,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 TIF Revenue 0 0 393,750 150,000 0 0 0 Other Governments 0 190,000 300,000 200,000 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL $1,701,980 $4,792.000 $2,445.205 $1,593.000 $518,000 $1,152,000 $1,050,000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CDBG 75,000 75,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 125,000 625,000 EDA Levy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TIF Revenue 2,800,000 800,000 6,000,000 0 0 0 0 Other Funds 75,000 75,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 125,000 625,000 SUBTOTAL $2,950,000 $950,000 $6,200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $250,000 $1,250.000 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT• DATA PROCESSING General Fund 96,130 97,000 200,000 100,000 90,000 140,000 550,000 Other Funds 21,900 0 255,000 0 0 0 0 OTHER EQUIPMENT General Fund 0 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 Heritage Center Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Improvements Fund 390,000 200,000 750,000 0 0 0 0 Water Utility 275,000 250,000 250,000 CENTRAL GARAGE VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT Central Garage Fund 286,600 534,800 696,600 447,000 278,200 360,000 1,166,800 Golf Course Fund 26,100 15,640 28,000 0 0 0 0 GO Bonds 0 125,000 170,000 0 0 0 0 Water Utility 55,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sanitary Sewer Utility 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storm Drainage Utility 0 0 86,000 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL $875,730 $1,257,440 $2.435,600 $797,000 $368,200 $500,000 $1.716,800 GRAND TOTAL $8,648,490 $13,153,640 $28,610,705 $8,400,000 $2,351,200 $2,767,000 $13,391,800 A. INFRASTRUCTURE A high level of maintenance is provided for existing infrastructure and for the rehabilitation or reconstruction of facilities as needed to improve their functionality, safety, or serviceability. A twenty year Neighborhood Street and Utility Imprvoement Program to systematically address neighborhood street and utility needs was begun in 1993. By way of this program, one or more neighborhood projects comprising two to four miles of streets each are improved with rehabilitated or reconstructed streets and public utilities. While most of the City of Brooklyn Center is fully developed, some new development areas and redevelopment areas require the installation of public improvements. The City requires developers to finance and install all public improvements necessary to service their developments. Any oversizing of facilities to provide capacity to service an area greater than the project area is financed by the City through such sources as the Municipal State Aid Street funds, water and sewer utility funds, storm drainage utility funds and tax increment financing (TIF) funds. 1. Water Utility All costs for water supply, distribution, O &M, and improvements are financed through water use charges, connection charges, and lateral assessments. Charges are adjusted annually based on a rate study analysis which reviews operation, maintenance, and construction costs and projected water demand. Proposed activities relating to the public water supply /distribution system include: • a. A routine well inspection and maintenance program to assure the continued functioning of the existing wells. b. Painting the water towers. C. Long-term consideration 0 of construction of two new supply facilities g pp y ltles (one storage reservoir and one additional well) to assure the system's ability to provide needed capacity during peak demand periods and for fire protection. d. Consideration of construction of a tie -in with Brooklyn Park's water system, to help meet demand during emergencies. e. Installation of various water distribution system improvements to assure the system's ability to deliver needed capacities to all portions of the City during peak demand periods and for fire protection, and replacement of existing mains as necessary with the Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Program 2. Sanitary Sewer Utility All costs for sanitary sewer system O &M and improvements are financed through sewer use charges, capital improvement bonds, connection charges and lateral assessments. Charges are adjusted annually based on a rate study analysis which reviews operation, maintenance, and construction costs, as well as • City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1996 -2005 Page 10 sewage treatment charges from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (formerly Metropolitan Waste Control Commission), which provides wastewater treatment for the entire Twin City metro area. Proposed activities relating to the sanitary sewer collection system include: a. A routine sewer and lift station inspection and maintenance program. b. Replacement of the existing lift station monitoring system, to improve its reliability. C. Replacement of any segments of sewer which have been identified as needing replacement by the television inspection program, and as necessary with the Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Program. d. Replacement of one major lift station and associated force main, to insure its reliability. 3. Storm Drainage Utility Phase I of the Local Water Management Plan has been completed and approved. This plan, which is a comprehensive evaluation of the City's storm drainage system, outlines deficiencies in the existing system, and will be used to develop plans for specific capital improvements. High - priority areas of deficiency are being evaluated on a faster track, and the CIP includes projects to address those high priority concerns. All costs for storm drainage system O &M and improvements are financed through the storm drainage utility (SDU) user fee system which was adopted in 1991, capital improvement bonds, and special assessments. Charges are adjusted annually based on a rate study analysis which reviews all costs relating to the storm drainage system. Proposed activities relating to the storm drainage system include: a. Construction of a storm drainage /treatment pond to serve the Brooklyn Boulevard /69th Avenue redevelopment area, and a joint project with the City of Minneapolis to construct a drainage pond to serve the Shingle Creek commercial area and some residential areas. b. Storm drainage improvements are proposed to be completed as necessary with the Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Program. 4. Sidewalk /Trail Improvements The City has established and constructed a comprehensive sidewalk system which serves all major activity areas and corridors of pedestrian traffic. Only a few segments of this system remain to be completed. In addition, the City has developed a plan for development of a comprehensive trail system to provide recreational trails for pedestrians and transportation trails for bicyclists. Both on- street and off - street trails are being developed, and integrated into the regional trail system which serves the Twin City metropolitan area. Where feasible, trail construction is being coordinated with other construction projects to assure lowest cost development of this system. Funding for sidewalk and trail improvements is provided by two accounts within the Municipal State Aid Construction fund. • City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1996 -2005 Page 11 Activities included in the CIP for future consideration include: • a. Construction of several trail segments, with emphasis given to segments which connect major trail systems. b. Some high priority sidewalk segments. C. Consideration of the Twin Lake Trail system and trail head improvements is shown under Parks and Recreation. 5. Parks and Recreation Park and Recreation facilities were comprehensively reviewed in 1993, while recreation programming will be reviewed in 1996. A program of playground equipment replacement has been initiated, but additional needs such as rehabilitation or replacement of shelters, ballfield lights, etc. have not yet been programmed. Some items are proposed for funding from the Capital Improvements Fund. Other major capital improvements are proposed to be funded with general obligation bonds authorized b P g g Y referendum approval. While continuing the current level of operation and maintenance of the ark and P P recreation system /program, the CIP anticipates the following projects: a. Completion of the replacement of playground equipment in neighborhood parks by 1997. b. Acquisition of new park land. • C. Development of the Twin Lake /Preserve/Kylawn nature area and Twin Lakes Trail system, in cooperation with the cities of Crystal and Robbinsdale. d. Comprehensive review of shelter building needs, and repair or replacement of most shelter buildings over the next five years. e. A major study of the Shingle Creek corridor, from the south City limits, through the golf course, Central Park, and Palmer Lake to the north City limits. The study would encompass recreational opportunities, water quality issues, and condition of existing facilities. f. Consideration of major new facilities, such as a hockey arena or a golf dome. These items would only be considered by referendum. 6. Street Improvement and Maintenance Programs The City is responsible for maintaining just over 100 miles of streets; about 80 miles are classified as neighborhood streets, and just over 21 miles as Municipal State Aid streets. Improvements are generally financed through a combination of sources, such as municipal state aid, GO bonds, and special assessments. The City's programs relating to streets under its jurisdiction include the following: • City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1996 -2005 Page 12 a. An annual sealcoating program. This sealcoating is done in accordance with the • recommendations of the Pavement Management Program, which is on average once every seven to ten years. b. The Municipal State Aid Street program, to which the State of Minnesota provides annual funding (about $850,000 annually) to maintain and improve the 21.3 miles of collector streets which are designated as MSA streets. C. Review and possible construction of traffic signal systems at intersections with growing traffic volumes. d. Several landscaping and "streetscaping" projects to enhance the appearance of the City. e. Rehabilitation and reconstruction of residential streets, under the Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement program. Neighborhoods are prioritized based on data from the Pavement Management Program, Local Storm Water Management Plan, or water or sanitary sewer utility maintenance records. f. An Assessment Stabilization Program financed by Local State Aid funds provides grants to low income property owners to assist in paying special assessments. B. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT • 1. Government Buildings The City owns and operates several major facilities City Hall and the Community Center (together, the Civic Center); the Central Garage; and two fire stations. In addition, the City owns two of the three municipal liquor store buildings. The City also owns and operates the Earle Brown Heritage Center, a convention center and Inn complex developed from several buildings formerly housing the historic Earle Brown estate and horse farm. The Central Garage was recently remodelled and expanded. Similar improvements to the City Hall and Community Center and to the two fire stations are under consideration. Proposed funding for the improvements would come from several sources. The Capital Improvements Fund would finance some of the proposed projects. Other improvements would be considered for funding from General Obligation bonds. It is expected that a referendum considering authorization of the sale of bonds would be placed on the ballot in 1996. Proposed major improvements to be considered over the next several years include: a. An addition to the City Hall building with the emphasis on providing additional space for the Police Department, alleviating severe space needs, improving the Council Chambers, meeting ADA accessibility requirements, correcting code violations, and upgrading mechanical systems. b. An addition to the Community Center with the emphasis on improved accessibility. City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1996 -2005 Page 13 C. Replacement of the City's vehicle fuel system and construction of an additional storage building • at the Central Garage. d. Construction of additions to both of the City's fire stations to provide improved training facilities and increased vehicle storage space. e. Several improvements to the Heritage Center are being studied. These include acquisition of additional land to serve as overflow parking; the eventual construction of the G barn; and various modifications to the Heritage Center itself to improve its profitability. f. The liquor store operations are also under study. Buildings may be upgraded or eliminated, and additional buildings may even be considered. 2. Data Processing The City currently obtains its data processing services from two sources: major data processing systems (financial, utility billing, payroll) through LOGIS, a consortium of 19 suburban cities and the Metropolitan Council; and through desk top PC applications served by a Local Area Network (LAN) and the LOGIS Wide Area Network (WAN). This area has experienced rapid growth, and a substantial investment in DP equipment has been made. Additions of new hardware and software and replacement of hardware are evaluated through the annual budget process. Acquisition is funded primarily through the general fund budget, although the various enterprise funds are charged the cost of requisite equipment. Proposed major improvements include: • a. Periodic upgrades of the LAN to provide for increased opportunities for data application and Pg P PP � PP hardware sharing and productivity enhancements. b. Acquisition, replacement, or upgrade of major applications. C. In the long term, installation of a mini - computer or client- server system in the Civic Center to convert Brooklyn Center to a LOGIS distributed site d. Continued replacement of hardware and software as necessary. e. Replacement of the City's telephone systems at the Civic Center, Heritage Center, and Garage. f. Replacement of the City's public safety and public works radio systems. 3. Vehicles and Equipment The City policy for the replacement of vehicles and equipment establishes a projected reasonable life cycle for each item. Annually, the life cycles are reviewed and updated on the basis of experience or changed circumstances. Also, new vehicles and equipment are proposed for addition to existing inventories and replacement schedules when new needs are clearly demonstrated. • City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1996 -2005 Page 14 The City operates a Central Garage Internal Service Fund, which now owns all vehicles and major equipment. The cost of owning (depreciation, license, insurance, overhead) and operating i (preventative maintenance and repair) vehicles and equipment is charged back to the departments using the equipment. Replacement of existing equipment is funded from the Fund. The addition of equipment is funded from a variety of sources: the General Fund, enterprise funds, etc. C. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Community Development improvements fall into two categories: economic development activities and housing programs. Community Development activities are funded from a combination of TIF revenue, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, the EDA levy, and Heritage Center revenue. A category of "Other funds" is shown on Table J to indicate that funding has not been identified for some proposed activities. 1. Economic Development The major economic development activities are commercial development and residential redevelopment. Activities include: a. Redevelopment of Brooklyn Boulevard. The first phase took a basic approach to identifying options for redevelopment. The second phase identified specific themes, improvements, planning considerations, etc., to be used in guiding redevelopment. The City has received a $500,000 federal grant to help finance enhancements to Brooklyn Boulevard, such as • undergrounding overhead utility lines; adding ornamental pedestrian lighting; and adding landscaping and other beautification. These enhancements will be constructed with Hennepin County's 1997 project to improve Brooklyn Boulevard between 65th and 71st Avenues. b. The City continues to work together with the Brookdale Shopping center to provide support for redevelopment of Brookdale and the entire Shingle Creek commercial area. C. Blighted and mature properties, both commercial and residential, have been identified for acquisition, clearance, and sale for redevelopment. 2. Housing Current housing programs include the scattered site housing program, which focuses on acquiring blighted single- family homes for clearance and sale of the lot for replacement housing; some multiple family acquisitions, and home rehab grant /loans. These programs are funded primarily by Community Development Block Grants (CDBG). a. It is anticipated that the program of purchasing dilapidated single family houses and apartment buildings will continue and possibly be expanded as funds are available. b. Expansion of the home rehab grant /loan program is being considered, again contingent on identification of funding. • City of Brooklyn Center Capital Improvement Program 1996 -2005 Page 15 Appendix A CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND EXPENDITURE POLICY POLICY OBJECTIVE The City of Brooklyn Center makes unrestricted capital expenditures through one of two funds. Generally, small capital expenditures are funded through the general fund and planned for as part of the annual budgeted process for the general fund. Large unrestricted capital expenditures are funded through the capital improvements fund based on resolution 68 -246, which was approved in 1968. Capital expenditures are also made through other funds such as the M.S.A. construction fund, the special assessment construction fund, the water fund, the sanitary sewer fund, and the storm drainage fund. These funds each have restrictions in place to guide their expenditures. The objective of this policy is to clarify funding for all unrestricted capital expenditures by specifically defining which capital expenditures are eligible for funding through the capital improvements fund. Unrestricted capital expenditures not meeting the criteria for the capital improvements fund must be made from the general fund operating budget. Specifically excluded from this policy are capital expenditures that are to be reimbursed by insurance proceeds. These may be accounted for through the capital improvements fund at the discretion of the Director of Finance. • SOURCE OF FIND The sources are ad- valorem taxes, issuance of bonds, state and federal grants, transfers of unrestricted balances from other funds and investment earnings. USE OF FUNDS The following defines general expenditure criteria for the utilization of the capital improvements fund balance. A.) Major: Any capital expenditure that exceeds $25,000. Capital expenditures of less than $25,000 are to be made through the general fund operating budget. B.) Permanent: Any capital expenditure that has an estimated useful life of 10 years or longer. C.) Facility: Buildings, improvements to real estate, the acquisition of land for city purposes. This definition excludes the acquisition of land for development or resale and excludes vehicles. • Additionally, the capital improvements fund may be used to provide loans to other funds maintained by the City. However, loans from the capital improvement fund may only be made • to proprietary funds which have the ability to generate revenue and repay the loan within 10 years at prevailing interest rates. AUTHORITY TO SPEND Expenditures meeting the above criteria may be funded through the capital improvements fund based on the following authority limits: A.) Expenditures from $0 to $25,000: Not eligible for funding from the capital improvements fund. Funding is required through the general fund operating budget. B.) Expenditures from $25,001 to $200,000: The City Council may, through simple majority, approve these expenditures. C.) Expenditures over $200,000: Following a public hearing, City Council may, through a 4 /5th's majority, approve expenditures in this category. SPENDING LITMITATION/FUND BALAINCE REOUIREMENT The objective as described above and previously defined in Resolution 68 -246 requires the capital • improvements fund to be a permanent source of funding for planned major expenditures. As such, the following criteria is established to comply with that intent: A.) Planned Expenditures: If the proposed capital expenditure is in excess of $200,000 it must have been included in the five year capital improvements plan for at least two years. Additionally, the five year capital improvements plan must be approved by the City Council at a public hearing on an annual basis. B.) Fund Balance Requirements: A minimum fund balance shall be maintained with a beginning balance of $3,000,000 as of January 1, 1993 and increased by the Consumer Price Index each year thereafter. POLICY AMENDMENT Amendments to this policy require a 4 /5th's majority by City Council vote. • TABLE A - Capital Improvementoogram - Detail of Capital Outlays • Water Utility Capital Improvements 04- Jan - 9619.! EXPENDITURES: WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 69th Avenue, Shingle Creek Pkwy to Dupont 300,000 All water utility Neighborhood Street Improvements 65,780 140,000 300,000 120,000 150,000 150,000 750,000 WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 2 MG Reservoir & Pumping Station 3,300,000 Construct Well #11 1,000,000 MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS New Electric Controls at Wells 5, 6, 7 30,000 Emergency tie -in to Brooklyn Park 225,000 WATER TOWERS Repair Paint on Tower #1 180,000 Repair Paint on Tower #2 225,000 Replace Paint on Tower #3 625,000 Landscape Tower #1 10,000 MISCELLANEOUS Routine Well Maintenance 50,000 50,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 275,000 SCADA Hardware & Software Update 20,000 SCADA Replacement 125,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $165,780 $500,000 $705,000 $1,025,000 $385,000 $205,000 $5,325,000 FUND SOURCES: Water Utility 165,780 500,000 705,000 1,025,000 385,000 205,000 5,325,000 TOTAL r $165,780 $500,000 $705,000 $1,025,000 $385,000 $205,000 $5,325,000 TABLE B - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays Sanitary Sewer Utility Capital Improvements 04- Jan -96 EXPENDITURES: All San Sewer Utility LIFT STATIONS Replace Lift #1 and Forcemain 50,000 1,100,000 Replace Lifts 10 & 11 100,000 120,000 SEWER REPLACEMENT: Trunk line, 69th Avenue to Lift Station #1 800,000 Neighborhood Street Improvements 132,300 150,000 200,000 300,000 250,000 250,000 1,250,000 MISCELLANEOUS INTRAC Replacement 125,000 125,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $982,300 $1,250,000 $425,000 1 $300,000 1 $495,000 $250,000 $1,250,000 FUND SOURCES: Sanitary Sewer Utility 982,300 1,250,000 425,000 300,000 495,000 250,000 1,250,000 TOTAL $982,300 $1,250,000 $425,000 $300,000 $495,000 $250,000 $1,250,000 TABLE C - Capital Improvemenoogram - Detail of Capital Outlays Storm Drainage Utility Capital Improvements 04- Jan -96 <. 1995 1996 1997... 1 98..:.::......t 99 O((l 2aQ1��o5. >: I >::Ftlll;D.UCEi »:: EXPENDITURES: Water Quality Improvements 0 100,000 50,000 100,000 50,000 100,000 500,000 All storm drainage utility 69th Avenue, Beard to Shingle Creek Pkwy Neighborhood Street Improvements 530,000 400,000 210,000 150,000 300,000 275,000 1,375,000 1694 /Brooklyn Boulevard Pond' /65th Ave 1,245,000 Shingle Creek Regional Pond 3,100,000 1/4 SDU, 3/4 assessments Brooklyn Boulevard Redevelopment Pond 250,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,775,000 $3,600,000 $510,000 $250,000 $350,000 $375,000 $1,875,000 FUND SOURCES: I Storm Drainage Utility 1,615,000 500,000 510,000 250,000 350,000 375,000 1,875,000 Special Assessments /Other 160,000 3,100,000 0 TOTAL $1,775,000 $3,600,000 $510,000 $250,000 $350,000 $375,000 $1,875,000 'The park improvements associated with this project, also to be funded by the SDU, are shown in Table E, Park Improvements TABLE D - Capital Improvemen*gram - Detail of Capital Outlays Sidewalk and Trail Improvements 04-Jan-96 EXPENDITURES: OFF - STREET TRAIL: NSP Easement Trail, Knox to Dupont 50,000 Local State Aid Willow Lane, 1694 to West River Road 25,000 Local State Aid 69th Avenue, Shingle Creek Parkway- Dupont 50,000 Local State Aid ON- STREET TRAIL: Marking and Signage 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 General Fund SIDEWALK: Miscellaneous Repairs 75,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 Local State Aid Northway Drive 25,000 Local State Aid 55th Avenue, Lions Park to Logan 35,000 Local State Aid TOTAL EXPENDITURES $75,000 $35,000 $220,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $175,000 FUND SOURCES: State Aid - Local Accounts #2911/ #2900 75,000 25,000 210,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 General Fund 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 TOTAL $75,000 $35,000 $220,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $175,000 NOTE: The sidewalk and trail plan is currently undergoing comprehensive review. TABLE E - Capital Improvemenogram - Detail of Capital Outlays Park Improvements 04-Jan-96 t9 IE997 EXPENDITURES: Shingle Cr Corridor Rec Facility Study & EAW 50,000 Capital Impr Fund ADA: Trails & curb cuts 72,700 Capital Impr Fund Park at Park and Ride See Table C Storm Drainage Utility Repair ped bridges in parks /golf course 100,000 Capital Impr Fund /Golf Crs Replace bleachers 56,000 General Fund Twin Lake Trail 450,000 GO Park Bonds,ISTEA Twin Lake trailhead acq & improvements 300,000 GO Park Bonds Acquisition & development of Joslyn site 200,000 GO Park Bonds Hockey arena 4,000,000 GO Park Bonds Golf d ome 200,000 Golf Course Fund INDIVIDUAL PARK IMPROVEMENTS Bellvue Shelter 120,000 GO Park Bonds Playground equipment 35,000 GO Park Bonds Brooklane Shelter 12,800 GO Park Bonds Playground equip (w /Garden City School) 20,000 Cap impr Fund Central Fix ball diamonds 20,000 GO Park Bonds Centerbrook Golf Course Rehab shelter building 12,100 Golf Course Fund Build picnic shelter 120,000 Golf Course Fund Expand clubhouse I ? IGolf Course Fund TABLE E - Capital Improvementgram - Detail of Capital Outlays Park Improvements 04- Jan -96 Evergreen Shelter 120,000 GO Park Bonds Ball field lights 100,000 GO Park Bonds Move hockey rink 40,000 GO Park Bonds Storage buildings 10,000 General Fund Satellite enclosures 5,000 General Fund Firehouse Shelter 120,000 GO Park Bonds Playground equipment GO Park Bonds Trail lights 7,000 GO Park Bonds Freeway Trail lights 7,000 GO Park Bonds Garden City Shelter 4,200 General Fund Playground equipment 40,000 Cap Impr Fund Enlarge parking lot 30,000 GO Park Bonds Grandview Shelter 45,000 GO Park Bonds Playground equipment 40,000 Cap Impr Fund Move rink 12,000 GO Park Bonds Ball field lights 100,000 GO Park Bonds Trail lights 14,000 GO Park Bonds Happy Hollow Picnic Shelter 60,000 GO Park Bonds Playground equipment 35,000 GO Park Bonds Trail lights 7,000 GO Park Bonds Kylawn Shelter 120,000 GO Park Bonds Playground equipment 35,000 GO Park Bonds Hockey lights 50,000 GO Park Bonds TABLE E - Capital Improvemen*gram - Detail of Capital Outlays Park Improvements 04-Jan-96 9 .... ..................................................................... ............................:.. . Lions Marlin Playground equipment 35,000 Cap Impr Fund Northport Shelter 100,000 GO Park Bonds Trail lights 7,000 GO Park Bonds Rehab tennis courts 40,000 Cap Impr Fund Storage buildings 10,000 General Fund Orchard Shelter 100,000 GO Park Bonds Trail lights 7,000 GO Park Bonds E Palmer Shelter 100,000 GO Park Bonds Playground equipment 35,000 GO Park Bonds Trail lights 7,000 GO Park Bonds W Palmer Shelter 80,000 GO Park Bonds Playground equipment 40,000 Cap Impr Fund Storage buildings 20,000 General Fund Trail lights 7,000 GO Park Bonds Nature Area Build picnic shelter 80,000 GO Park Bonds Repl nature trail chips w /crushed limestone 25,500 GO Park Bonds Riverdale Picnic shelter 60,000 GO Park Bonds Playground equipment 35,000 1 GO Park Bonds TABLE E - Capital Improvementgram - Detail of Capital Outlays Park Improvements 04- Jan -96 ...... ....... ............. Twin Beach Playground equipment 35,000 GO Park Bonds Fishing pier, including parking lot 64,000 GO Park Bonds /DNR? Extend trail 7,500 GO Park Bonds Wangstad Playground equipment 35,000 GO Park Bonds Willow Lane Shelter 100,000 GO Park Bonds Playground equipment Capital Impr Fund Ball field lighting 50,000 GO Park Bonds Trail lights 7,000 GO Park Bonds TOTAL EXPENDITURES $72,700 $269,200 $3,314,900 $4,200,000 $o $o $0 FUND SOURCES: Capital Impr Fund $72,700 $265,000 $100,000 $0 $0 General Fund 0 4,200 101,000 0 0 0 0 Golf Course 0 0 132,100 200,000 GO Bonds 0 2,981,800 4,000,000 0 0 0 Storm Drainage Utility See Table C 0 0 0 TOTAL $72,700 $269,2001 $3,314,900 $4,200,000 $0 $0 $o TABLE F - Capital Improvemen*gram - Detail of Capital Outlays Public Building Improvements 04- Jan -96 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 -2005 FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURES: CIVIC CENTER SHORT TERM, INTERIM REMODELLING Minor City Hall remodelling` 50,000 Capital Impr Fund LONG TERM NEEDS Construct Public Safety addition and 6,000,000 GO Bonds remodel existing City Hall space GO Bonds OPTIONAL APPROACH: Piecemeal Remodelling Replace HVAC system ? ? GO Bonds, Cap Impr Fund, Upgrade lighting ? ? Additional storage ? ? Remodel Council Chambers ? ? General Fund Expand Police department ? ?? ? ? Replace underground storage tanks ? ? Replace roof ? ? ADA Compliance ? ? COMMUNITY CENTER OPTION 1: Space Needs Study Activity & Fitness Center 10,000,000 GO Bonds OPTION 2: Alternative Approach Accessibility and functionality improvements 2,500,000 GO Bonds TABLE F - Capital Improvemenogram - Detail of Capital Outlays Public Building Improvements 04- Jan -96 1 .> ... COMMUNITY CENTER OTHER NEEDS: Replace carpet throughout 90,000 General Fund Pool ozonation system 40,000 General Fund Renovate wading pool 50,000 General Fund CENTRAL GARAGE Site improvements 325,000 Capital Impr, Utilities Additional Storage 450,000 Capital Impr, Utilities FIRE STATIONS Remodel East Station 1,600,000 GO Bonds Remodel West Station 1,300,000 GO Bonds i HERITAGE CENTER Acquire land /build parking lot 500,000 TIF Construct G barn 750,000 TIF LIQUOR STORES Remodel existing /add new facility ? ? Liquor Fund TOTAL EXPENDITURES $50,000 $5 00,000 $12,355,000 $0 $0 $0 $750,000 FUND SOURCES: General Fund 0 Capital Improvements Fund 50,000 792,500 0 0 0 Water Utility 81,250 0 0 0 Sanitary Sewer Utility 81,250 0 0 0 TIF 500,000 750,000 GO Bonds 11,400,000 0 TOTAL $50,000 $500,000 $12,355,000 $0 $0 $o $750,000 * Project also includes acquisition of workstation furniture and high density storage, which is shown in Table H: Equipment. TABLE G - Capital Improvement Pram - Detail of Capital Outlays Street Improvements 04- Jan -96 EXPENDITURES: SEALCOATING 120,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 General Fund SIGNALS Brooklyn Blvd & 51 st Avenue 150,000 0 Local State Aid Summit & Earle Brown W (Target Entrance) 125,000 0 Special Assessments & Local State Aid STATE AID STREET PROJECTS 57th Avenue. Logan to Lyndale 1,130,000 MSA- Regular #1496 404,000 MSA - Regular #1496 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 76,000 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 Water Utility 50,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 10,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 400,000 Storm Drainage Utility Hennepin County 190,000 Hennepin County Humboldt Avenue, 69th to N City Limits 552,180 MSA - Regular #1496 335,540 MSA - Regular #1496 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 102,900 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 Water Utility 0 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 22,870 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 40,170 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 50,700 Special Assessments TABLE G - Capital Improvementgram - Detail of Capital Outlays Street Improvements 04- Jan -96 ; .:::..:.......::.::::....... ;:....::..: . > ... �9�� ......:.. ��.��::::.. � QUO;;: >;;; .:. ��') ��::- ��►::>:::::>::>: «::�:.lJl�it�.:��1�#��I�....... .............................. ............................... 73rd Avenue. TH252 to Humboldt 200,000 50% Brooklyn Park MSA- Regular #1496 175,000 MSA - Regular #1496 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 (51,000) MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 Water Utility 31,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 5,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 0 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 40,000 Special Assessments Noble Avenue Brooklyn Blvd to N City Lit 41,300 MSA - Regular #1496 26,800 MSA - Regular #1496 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 0 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 Water Utility 0 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 0 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 0 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 14,500 Special Assessments Brooklyn Boulevard. 64th to N City Limits ROW Acquisition 600,000 50% #1496, 50% #2911/M Road Construction 435,205 Various Lighting, Landscaping, Other 1,425,000 500,000 TIF, Sp Assess, #2911/ #29( 67th Avenue, Humboldt to Dupont 189,000 MSA - Regular #1496 148,000 MSA - Regular #1496 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 (41,000) MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 Water Utility 14,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 7,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 10,000 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 51,000 1 Special Assessments i TABLE G - Capital Improvemen - 00gram - Detail of Capital Outlays Street Improvements n- ,. 04- LC.:tE #:.;:.;:..:: Logan Avenue N. 53rd to 57th 539,000 MSA- Regular #1496 270,000 MSA - Regular #1496 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 40,000 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 Water Utility 81,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 13,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 55,000 Storm Drainage Utility Special Ass 80,000 Spec Assessme 51st Avenue, Brooklyn Blvd to Xerxes 81,000 MSA - Regular #1496 48,000 MSA - Regular #1496 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 8,000 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 Water Utility 5,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 1,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 10,000 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 9,000 Special Assessments 53rd Avenue France to 55th Avenue 415,000 MSA - Regular #1496 247,000 MSA- Regular #1496 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 51,000 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 Water Utility 25,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 25,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 0 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 67,000 Special Assessments 69th Avenue. Oliver to Dupont 847,000 MSA - Regular #1496 608,000 MSA - Regular #1496 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 63,000 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 Water Utility (see Table A) 0 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 3,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 25,000 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 148,000 1 Special Assessments TABLE G - Capital I m prove mentoogram - Detail of Capital Outlays • Street Improvements 04 -Jan 96 ; ; . '1�,��8.. >:.;..:.... ��!9.;�.... ��p�.;<:::«:::::::��►�.; >�. apt)! 5;;:..:. .;:;;;:..�t�1rJC�►:��Ll1�::: >:> 69th Ave Shingle Cr Pkwy to Oliver & Bridge 1,265,000 MSA- Regular #1496 1,060,000 MSA- Regular #1496 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 (2,000) MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 Water Utility (See Table A) 0 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 2,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 100,000 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 105,000 Special Assessments France Avenue. 69th to N City Limits 349,000 MSA - Regular #1496 233,000 MSA - Regular #1496 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 18,000 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 Water Utility 31,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 2,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 0 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 65,000 Special Assessments 63rd Avenue, W City Limits to Brooklyn Blvd 1,002,000 MSA - Regular #1496 596,000 MSA - Regular #1496 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 156,000 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 Water Utility 95,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 5,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 0 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 150,000 Special Assessments 63rd Avenue, Brooklyn Boulevard to Xerxes 270,000 MSA - Regular #1496 172,000 MSA - Regular #1496 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 (37,000) MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 Water Utility 17,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 34,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 0 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 84,000 Special Assessments TABLE G - Capital Improvemenoogram - Detail of Capital Outlays • Street Improvements 04-Jan-96 ......... 995 June Avenue. CSAH 10 to 63rd 378,000 MSA- Regular #1496 269,000 MSA - Regular #1496 MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 (29,000) MSA -Local #2911/ #2900 Water Utility 10,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 51,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 0 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 77,000 Special Assessments NEIGHBORHOOD STREET PROJECTS Northwest/James /Knox Combination of GO GO Bonds bonds and special Special Assessments assessments Woodbine GO Bonds 645,700 Special Assessments 312,800 Orchard East ;James /Knox 55 -57th GO Bonds Special Assessments Orchard West; Redevelopment area GO Bonds Special Assessments South Garden City ; High school area GO Bonds Special Assessments Wangstad area; south Northwest area GO Bonds Special Assessments ASSESSMENT STABILIZATION PROGRAM 30,000 30,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 50,000 280,000 Local State Aid TABLE G - Capital Improvemenoogram - Detail of Capital Outlays Street Improvements 04-Jan-96 :..;:. LANDSCAPING Co Rd 10 Streetscape 100,000 1/2 MSA -2900, 1/2 Sp Asse. Xerxes Avenue Streetscape 70,000 MSA -Local #2900 TO EXPENDITURE $1,701,980 $4,792,0001 $2,445,205 $1,593,000 $518,000 $1,152 $1,050,000 FUND SOURCES: MSA - Regular #1496 362,340 2,865,000 174,025 628,000 269,000 596,000 172,000 MSA - Local #2911/ #2900 132,900 464,000 842,030 68,000 11,000 206,000 243,000 Water Utility 0 167,000 10,875 70,000 10,000 95,000 17,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility 22,870 34,000 10,875 34,000 51,000 5,000 34,000 Storm Drainage Utility 40,170 590,000 101,150 10,000 0 0 0 Special Assessments 378,000 382,000 512,500 333,000 77,000 150,000 84,000 Bonds 645,700 0 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund 120,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 TIF Funding 393,750 150,000 Other Governments 0 190,000 300,000 200,000 0 1 0 0 TOTAL $1,701,980 $4,792,000 $2,445,205 $1,593,000 $518,000 1 $1,152,000 $1,050,000 TABLE H - Capital Improvement jP. rn gra - Detail of Capital Outlays ,W Equent 08- Jan -96 ............................... ............................:.. EXPENDITURES: DATA PROCESSING Network Upgrades 32,000 1,000 20,000 10,000 30,000 General fund; Heritage Centi Optical Disk Management 0 125,000 General fund Software & applications 28,150 5,500 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 General fund Hardware 57,880 61,055 80,000 80,000 80,000 100,000 500,000 General fund Replace cable 50,000 General fund; Heritage Centi Radio networking 40,000 1/2 GF; 25% each utility I LOGIS Distributed site 130,000 70% GF; 10% @ utility, 5 %liq,5 %HC OTHER EQUIPMENT Acquire ergonomic workstations & storag 390,000 Capital Improvements Fund Replace phone system 200,000 Capital Improvements Fund Replace pub safety /pub works radio system 750,000 Capital Improvements Fund Remote & regular water meters 275,000 250,000 250,000 Water Utility Replace chairs 10,000 General fund TOTAL EXPENDITURES $508,030 $542,555 $1,465,000 $350,000 $90,000 $140,000 $550,000 FUND SOURCES: General Fund 96,130 67,555 140,000 100,000 90,000 140,000 550,000 Heritage Center Fund 21,900 0 50,000 $0 $0 $0 Liquor Store Fund 0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements Fund 390,000 200,000 755,000 $0 $0 $0 Water Utility 275,000 510,000 250,000 $0 $0 $0 Sanitary Sewer Utility 0 10,000 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $508,030 $542,555 $1,465,000 $350,000 $90,000 $140,000 $550,000 TABLE H - Capital Improvemeneogram - Detail of s Capital Outlays Y Equipment - 96 4 Jan =` <?: >�> .... » »> > > >> ;<< >� >> > > >::' ' .: » >: >�::: »::: » >: �: >: >:: ><: >:;: >::. � :.: > o : F : EXPENDITURES: DATA PROCESSING Network Upgrades 32,000 10,000 20,000 10,000 30,000 GenewWu d Heritage Centi Optical Disk Management 0 125,000 General fund Software & applications '�Z ,150 7,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 ,50,000 General fund Hardware 57;840 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 100,000 500,000 General fund Replace cable 50,000 General fund; Heritage Cent( Radio networking 40,000 1/2 GF; 25% each utility I LOGIS Distributed site 130,000 70% GF; 10% @ uti1ity,5 %11q,5 %HC i OTHER EQUIPMENT Acquire ergonomic workstations & storag 390,000 Capital Improvements Fund Replace phone system 200,000 Capital Improvements Fund Replace pub safety /pub works radio system 750,000 Capital Improvements Fund Remote & regular water meters 275,000 250,000 250,000 Water Utility Replace chairs 10,000 General fund I TOTAL EXPENDITURES $508,030 $582,000 $1,455,000 $350,0017. $90,000 $140,000 $550,000 FUND SOURCES: General Fund 96 107,000 130,000 100,000 90,000 140,000 550,000 Heritage Center Fund 21,900 0 50,000 $0 $0 $0 Liquor Store Fund 0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements Fund 390,000 200,000 755,000 $0 $0 $0 Water Utility 275,000 510,000 250,000 $0 $10, $0 Sanitary Sewer Utility 0 10,000 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $508,030 $582,000 $1,455,000 $350,000 $90,OOOT $140,000 $550,000 • TABLE I - Capital Improvementoogram - Detail of Capital Outlays Central Garage Vehicles & Equipment 04- Jan -96 :. ...... 1995 .. 19J 195? .....; JJ E........ !9J....... 2 Ott .... 2n 1'i' 2tJ >; : : UND 0 #RAE:::: >:: .11 ............................ . ................... ............................... EXPENDITURES: STREETS Ford 800 Flat Bed /Sander 77,000 All Central Garage Fund Chipper 23,000 except where noted Bobcat loader with planer 34,300 Engineering survey van 16,000 Sign shop truck 30,800 Pickups: Light Duty 15,000 14,000 28,000 18,000 0 Pickups: Heavy Duty 31,320 24,000 Grader 159,000 3/4 Ton Van 26,600 Ford 800 Dump 82,640 170,000 80,000 82,000 82,000 Trackless Sidewalk Plow 47,000 47,000 47,000 Air Compressor 14,900 Crack sealing kettle /router 35,000 Vacuum Sweeper 86,000 Storm Drainage Utility Ford Tandem Dump 90,000 Paint Striper 40,000 Loader 126,000 160,000 Ford 700 Dump 36,000 Dozer 35,000 Oil distributer & truck 89,000 PARKS Pickups 15,000 15,000 Ford 350 Dump 28,640 27,000 27,000 Tractors 28,000 28,000 Mowers 65,000 45,000 32,000 Concession trailer 20,800 TABLE I - Capital Improvementogram - Detail of Capital Outlays e Central Garage Vehicles & Equipment . 04- Jan -96 X95.... '199 : 'I997 ..... 199 'C9J9 . > €:::.F:tJNDC)t1RO::<:: PUBLIC UTILITIES Emergency Utility Van 30,000 Water Utility Sewer Jet 95,000 Drill Rig 25,000 Water Utility Pickups 48,000 34,000 Ford 350 Dump /Utility Box 37,000 Sewer Rodder 21,000 GOLF COURSE 3/4 Ton Pickup 15,640 Golf Course Fund Mowers 26,100 28,000 Golf Course Fund FIRE DEPARTMENT Salvage Van & rescue van 170,000 GO Bonds Pumpers 125,000 GO Bonds Ladder Trucks /autos /vans 21,000 29,200 Boat 10,000 General Fund POLICE Squads 77,500 109,000 110,000 115,000 125,000 130,000 695,000 Staff cars 21,300 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $367,700 $675,440 $980,600 $447,000 $278,200 $360,000 $1,166,800 FUND SOURCES: Central Garage Fund 286,600 534,800 696,600 447,000 278,200 360,000 1,166,800 Water Utility 55,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storm Drainage Utility 0 0 86,000 0 0 0 0 Sanitary Sewer Utility 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Golf Course Fund 26,100 15,640 28,000 0 0 0 0 GO Bonds 0 125,000 170,000 0 0 0 0 TOTAL $367,700 $675,440 $980,600 $447,000 $278,200 $360,000 $1,166,800 TABLE J - Capital Improvement0ogram - Detail of Capital Outlays Y Community Development 04- Jan -96 :.... 195 ..... .... t9J.6 ...:9J ?.. EXPENDITURES: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Acquire property for redevelopment ? ? ? ? ? ? Brooklyn Blvd Redevelopment 800,000 800,000 ? ? ? TIF? HOUSING Acquire single family houses 150,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 1,250,000 1/2 CDBG, 1/2 Other? Acquire apartments 2,000,000 6,000,000 ? ? ? ? TIF Housing rehab loans /grants ? ? ? ? ? ? TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,950,000 $950,000 $6,200,0 $200,000 $200,000 $250,000 $1,250,000 FUND SOURCES: TIF revenue 2,800,000 800,000 6,000,000 0 0 CDBG 75,000 75,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 125,000 625,000 EDA levy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heritage Center Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funds 75,000 75,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 125,000 625,000 TOTAL $2,950,000 $950,000 $6,200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $250,000 $1,250,000 Council Meeting Date f 96 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number U Request For Council Consideration Item Description: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE PROJECT PEACE JOINT POWERS ORGANIZATION. Department Approval: Scott Kline, Chief of Police Manager's Review /Recommendation: . fl� No comments to supplement this repo (/ Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Authorize participation in the Project PEACE Joint Powers Organization for the purpose of providing domestic abuse intervention services. • Summary Explanation: (supplemental sheets attached - yes ) Project PEACE is a Joint Powers Organization that assists victims of domestic violence. Project PEACE provides support, education, and legal advocacy for those individuals and families that are in violent relationships. The Cities of Brooklyn Center, Maple Grove, and Robbinsdale participate in Project PEACE. The City of Champlin elected not to participate in Project PEACE effective January 1, 1996. The 1996 budget for Project PEACE is $94,957. The total budget is split among member cities on a formula based on population and usage of the services of Project PEACE. Brooklyn Center funds 50.5 % or $47,953 of the 1996 budget. The Joint Powers Agreement was amended to delete the City of Champlin from the agreement. We request approval of the Joint Powers Agreement to continue offering this effective and vital service. • �L Member introduced the following resolution and • moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PROJECT PEACE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT PROVIDING SERVICES RELATING TO DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION WHEREAS, The City of Brooklyn Center has had a domestic abuse intervention program since 1981; and WHEREAS, The general purpose of the intervention ro ram is to intervene in P g domestic assault cases by providing information and advocacy for victims for domestic assault and by advocating appropriate responses to assailants within the criminal justice and mental health systems; and WHEREAS, The police and city administration recommend continuance of the program and the city council agrees with this recommendation; and WHEREAS, The City has determined the most cost effective means of providing the service is through a Joint Powers Agreement with other suburban communities; and WHEREAS, The City of Brooklyn Center has been providing domestic abuse intervention services through Project PEACE since 1993; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the Mayor, the City Manager are hereby authorized to enter in to a Joint Powers Agreement (Project PEACE) for the purpose of providing services relating to domestic abuse intervention. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREENIENT FOR THE FORMATION OF THE PROJECT PEACE JOINT POWERS ORGANIZATION The parties to this agreement are governmental units of the State of Minnesota. This agreement is made and entered into pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1994, Section 471.59. ARTICLE I. GENERAL PURPOSE i The parties hereto have determined that it is in the best interest of their citizens to establish and maintain a joint and cooperative program to assist and counsel victims of domestic abuse, to which purpose they hereby enter this agreement. ARTICLE U. DEFINITIONS Section 1. For purposes of this agreement the terms defined in this Article have the • meanings given them. Section 2. "Agreement" means this agreement. Section 3. "Board" means the board of directors created by Article III. Section 4. "Director" means a director or alternate director appointed under Article III of this Agreement. Section 5. "Governing body" means the city council of a member. Section 6. "Member" means a governmental unit which is a parry to this Agreement and is in compliance with and in good standing under this Agreement. Section 7. "Project PEACE" or "Project PEACE Joint Powers Organization" means the organization established by this Agreement. c�1,sa2s� BR291 -104 1 DEC 18 '55 15:5E KENNEDY & GRAVEN F.3 ARTICLE ITT. BOARD OF DIRECTORS • Section 1. The overnin body of Project PEACE is its board of directors. A member g g y ) must appoint one director to the Board. A director has one vote. A member may appoint one alternate director. The alternate director may attend meetings of the Board and may vote in the absence of that member's director. Section 2. Directors are appointed by resolution of the governing body of a member. The appointing resolution must be filed with the secretary. The resolution must be accompanied by the direetor's address for purposes of notice. In the absence of specific action by a city council, that city's director will be its chief of police, and the alternate director will be the chief's designee. Section 3. The term of a director is one year. The terms of directors initially appointed expire on December 31, 1993. Directors serve until their respective successors are appointed and qualify. Section 4. A director may be removed from the Board at any time, with or without cause, by resolution of the governing body malting the appointment. The resolution removing the Director must be filed with the secretary. Section 5. A vacancy on the Board is filled in the same manner that an appointment of a director is made. Section 6. Directors may not vote by proxy. Section 7. A director may not vote if the Board determines that the member represented by the Director is not in compliance with this Agreement or if the Director has been removed from the Board. CIL38255 2 BR291 -104 DEC ie '95 15:52 KENNEDY & GRAVEN P.4 ARTICLE IV. MEETINGS Section 1. The directors of the initial members must conduct an organizational meeting no later than 30 days after January 1, 1993, which is the effective date of this agreement. At the organizational meeting, or as soon thereafter as is reasonably possible, the Board must elect its officers and adopt such by -laws and other procedures governing the conduct of its meetings and its business as it deems appropriate. Section 2. The Board must conduct an annual meeting at a date and place specified in its by -laws to elect officers and to undertake such other business as may properly come before it. The Board may provide for a schedule of regular meetings. A regular meeting must be held once in each calendar quarter in the year 1993 and thereafter as provided by the by -laws. Section 3. A special meeting of the Board may be called by the chair or by the secretary upon written request of such number of Directors as is specified by the by -laws. Notice of a special meeting must be mailed to Directors at least five days prior to the special meeting and in accordance with law. Business at special meetings is limited to matters contained in the notice of the special meeting. AR'T'ICLE V. OFFICERS: COMMITTEES t Section 1. The officers of the Board are a chair, vice chair and secretary/treasurer elected for a term of one year by the directors at the organizational meeting and at the annual meeting. The Board may designate directors to act as officers in the absence of an officer. Section 2. The chair presides at meetings of the Board. The secretary/treasurer is responsible for records of proceedings of the Board and such other matters as may be delegated to the secretary by the Board. CLL'sass 3 BR291 -104 DEC 13 '95 15 :53 KENNEDY & GRAVEN P.5 Section I The Board may in its by -laws provide for and define the duties of such I other officers as it determines necessary from time -to -time. Section 4. The Board may in its by -laws provide for such committees as it detesrrdnes necessary from time -to -time. A by -law providing for an executive committee and defining the 1 powers and duties of an executive committee may be adopted only by a favorable vote of all members of the Board. AR'T'ICLE VI. POWERS AND DUTIES Section 1. The Board may take such actions as it deems necessary and convenient to accomplish the general purposes of this Agreement. Section 2. The Board may: a. participation in proceedings at law provide for the prosecution, defense, or other p p P�' b p P or in equity in which it may have an interest; b. purchase, hold or dispose of real or personal property; C. contract for personal or professional services with a member or group of members or private parties provided such contracts are approved by the councils of all members; d. employ such persons at it deems necessary on either a part time, full time or consultant basis. I ARTICLE VII. FINANCIAL MATTERS Section 1. The fiscal year of Project PEACE is the calendar year. • Section 2. The Board must adopt an annual budget prior to July 1 of each year. The Board must give each member a reasonable opportunity to comment or object to the proposed =282ss BFt291 -ioa DEC 1e '55 15:53 KENNEDY & GRAVEN P.6 budget before adoption. Notice of the adopted budget must be mailed promptly thereafter to the administrative officer of each member. The budget is deemed approved by each member chief admims g unless, prior to August 1 of that year a member gives written notice to the secretary that the member is withdrawing at the end of the year as provided in this Agreement. In the event of withdrawal of a party the Board shall adopt an amended budget, including allocation of casts among the remaining parties, by September 1. Any remaining party may withdraw by giving notice to the secretary by September 15. Section 3. Operational and capital costs are to be shared according to methods agreed upon by unanimous vote of the Board. Allocation of costs shall be determined and agreed upon each year at the time of, and in conjunction with, approval of the budget. Section 4. Billings to members are due and payable no later than 30, days after mailing. In the event of a dispute as to the amount of a billing, a member must nevertheless make payment as billed to preserve membership status. The member may make payment subject to its right to dispute the bill and exercise any remedies available to it. Failure to pay a billing within 60 days results in suspension of voting privileges of the member's director. Failure to pay I a billing within 120 days is ground for termination of membership but Project PEACE rights to the obligation represented by the billing are not affected by termination of membership. Section 5. Purchases and contracts within the budget on behalf of Project PEACE may be made by any of the parries upon the unanimous authorization of the Board. Section 6. Members shall provide additional support such as space, equipment, administration or secretarial support, utilities and supplies as determined by unanimous vote of the Board. • cLL3aas� 5 SP.241104 DEC. 19 '95 15:54 KENNEDY & GRAVEN P.7 ARTICLE VIII. wiTHDRAwAL t PEACE b vin notice of e ber may y giving Section 1. A m m y withdraw from Project withdrawal within the time specified in Article VII, Section 2, by giving written notice to the secretary. The notice shall be accompanied by a certified copy of a resolution adopted by the governing body of that member authorizing its withdrawal from membership. The withdrawal h is effective at the end of the calendar year in which notice is given. Section 2. The withdrawal of a member does not affect that member's obligation to pay fees, charges or contractual charges for which it is obligated under this Agreement. ARTICLE LX. DISSOLUTION Section 1. Project PEACE shall be dissolved only upon the adoption of resolutions calling for dissolution by all remaining members or the effective date of withdrawal leaving • fewer than two remaining members. i Section 2. In the event of a dissolution, the Board must determine the measures necessary to effect the dissolution and must provide for the taking of such measures as promptly as circumstances permit, subject to the provisions of this Agreement and law. Section 3. In the event of dissolution and following the payment of all outstanding obligations, assets of Project PEACE will be distributed among the then existing members in pro- rata shares. If those obligations exceed the assets of Project PEACE, the net deficit will be charged to and paid by the members in proportion to its contributions during the year in which FACE b one of the parties Project P 'solution occurs. Property or made available to J Y P dissolution perry on the condition that that party has a right to recall such property, shall be returned to such party. CLL38255 6 SR391 -109 DEC 18 '95 15:54 KENNEDY & GRAVEN P.8 ARTICLE X. EFFECTIVE DATE: DURATION This Agreement continues in effect indefinitely unless terminated in accordance with its terms. This Agreement is effective on the day that executed copies of this Agreement accompanied by the member resolution authorizing its execution is filed by the members with the City Clerk of the City of Brooklyn Centex. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned governmental unit has caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officers and delivered on its behalf: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER I By Its Mayor • By Its Manager CITY OF MAPLE GROVE By Its Mayor B Its City Administrator i CLL38255 7 BR291 -10A CITY OF ROBBINSDALE By Its Mayor By Its Manager Received and filed by the City of Brooklyn Center this day of 199. BR291 -i09 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Myrna Kra Y Yrn gness Councilmember Kathleen Carmody Councilmember Debra Hilstrom Councilmember Kristen Mann FROM: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager DATE: January 3, 1996 SUBJECT: Tours of Fire Stations, City Hall, and Community Center We would like to schedule either a full Council tour of the fire stations, City Hall, and Community Center or simply schedule individual tours at each Councilmember's convenience. Since this is a preliminary step designed to familiarize you with the facilities that will be evaluated, we could provide either a group tour or simply schedule tours at each person's convenience to make scheduling easier for each member. • fN MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Myrna Kragness Councilmember Kathleen Carmody Councilmember Debra Hilstrom Councilmember Kristen Mann FROM: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager DATE: January 3, 1996 ? SUBJECT: Informal Discussion with City Manager It would be helpful for me if the Council would schedule an informal discussion at the Council's convenience. The informal discussion would be to discuss the Council's issues, procedures, and preferences and allow me the opportunity to discuss directions that I should be pursuing as I sort out priorities for staff. �O MEMORANDUM • TO: Mayor Myrna Kragness Councilmember Kathleen Carmody Councilmember Debra Hilstrom Councilmember Kristen Mann FROM: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager DATE: January 3, 1996 SUBJECT: Council Workshop I would propose to make arrangements for a facilitator to conduct a Council workshop in April. The 1996 budget provides for facilitated Council workshops. With a special election in March, it would seem more productive to wait until April when the new member could be included in the process. If this would be satisfactory with the Council, I would make arrangements for the 13th, 20th, or 27th for a facilitated Council workshop, the exact Saturday being dependent upon the availability of a facilitator. • • F / Public Services Department MEMORANDUM Govt Buildings {'- TO: Mike McCauley, City Manager Engineering „r FROM: Diane Spector, Director of Public Services Streets SUBJ: Open Space Easement at 7240 Brooklyn Boulevard DATE: January 4, 1996 Parks Public Utilities The City had in the past obtained an open space easement on the property at 7240 Brooklyn Boulevard. This easement (see attached Figure 1) provides for a 12 foot buffer between the property in question an Park Re Center High School to the north. The 12 foot strip is actually within the ,; corporate limits of Brooklyn Park. The easement requires that should the property owner desire to sell the Central property, he first obtain the approval of the City Council. Garage The property owner is currently making arrangements to sell the property. I have reviewed this easement with Zoning and Planning Specialist Ron Warren, and understand that no changes are contemplated for the property which would adversely impact the City's interest in preserving this green strip. I recommend the City approve the sale of this property, in accordance with the requirements of the Open Space Easement. Attachment Figure 1 \ \ Open Space Easement f 88 59.�. w O OF BROOKLYN CENTER \ i i 330 CREEK PART OF LOT 21 -- \ c - - -- (5) bZ' ( 204) \ 7235 P, 7240 / 589 °E 85 IIO MIN ARD 9 / Plow \ \\ / a y ( 141) W (140 ) 0 -' -/ (207) 97I0 97 (2110) \ \\ 6015 L �S ti 35 -16 ee ate 9719 $ 7223 2 q >O ' 0. 5 7 3 \ \ � V s o , 34 'I'� - �_• TRIAL pyaT 's ��, -'" \\ °�. (206) 0 \ GQ'` 6s•}° .�r --� ) �\ MM y /s \ \ma y \\ ms 's 4 9720 v�� Q D D Uhl 2 ( 205) y ( 146) `\ ° _ 37.5 24 _ 2 2A 8 3 ti 24 . 37.5 �`\ `\ 6 ( 147) AD 4 7216 P c Qj (157) 2 3 4 Q 1 2 i S6) \ 2�\ 4721 v8 �B 1. D \ 9 \ O ffi' 1 (160) m o ( 153) �� p \ \\ \ �� \ ro /y s \ \ \ � 28. g A6�a (l48) a v i (149) (178) 2,3 t 1 sz) o A2 \`� 97 7 2 \� s 37.5 1 1 \ \ �S\ s (180) q� �2� �so) 9 Q 25 (� ((1tJ�(� 4 4 �vJ((11��J Q(1\1OCK U il\1 ay II� 0 �81 �Z �91) \ \\ \ o J \ (182) J �20 �92) \\ ` 61 0 \t\ OUTLOT F A2• \ Z4 2 5 (188) �1 187) ^ (16) I (17) (18) (19) �. OPEN SPACE EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this 15th day of November, 1978, between INDEPENDENCE TEN, a general partnership, party of the first part, and the CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, a municipal corpor- ation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, party of the second part, W I T N E S S E T H That said party of the first part, in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consider- ation to it in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby Grant, Bargain, Quitclaim, and Convey unto the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns, forever, the following perpetual open space easement in, over, across and upon property located in the County of Hennepin and the State of Minnesota: The South 12 feet of the West 3 /4ths, of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the North- east Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 28, Township 119 North, Range 21 West of the 5th Principal Meridian., lying Easterly of and adjacent to the center line of State Highway 152. Grantor hereby covenants as follows: 1. No structure shall be constructed, erected or placed upon or above the described property including without limitation, fences, fireplaces, steps, docks, signs, billboards, dwellings, accessory buildings, utilities, hard cover or roads of any nature whatsoever, or any other structure or improvements inconsistent • with the maintenance of the described property as an open area, without the express written consent by City Council resolution, of the City of Brooklyn Center. 2. To landscape and maintain the described property, at its expense, in a fashion consistent with the side yard of the improvement of Grantor constructed upon Lot 1, Block 1, Shingle Creek Manor. 3. Not to convey the described property without the prior express written consent, by City Council resolution of the City of Brooklyn Center which consent shall not be unreasonably with- held. The provisions of this open space easement shall run with the land and shall extend to and bind the heirs, successors, representatives, grantees or assigns of the respective parties hereto. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME, together with all the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, to said party of the second part, its successors or assigns, forever. e -------------- . z has hereunto its O and t year p arty written. • INDEPENDENCE TEN A General Partner hip BY �Q44- Francis J. Gi dler A General Partner STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this tC day of November, 1978, by FRANCIS J. GIRDLER, a General Partner of INDEPENDENCE TEN, a Minnesota General Partnership, on behalf of said partnership. Zi�2�� Notary Public r-� JUDITH L MORE �r + SOT Aay PUBLIC • MINNESOTA RAMSEY COUNTY �mmission Expires Jan. 8. i9e5 • THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, et al. 4344 IDS Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 -2- x x:. - z �P Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO CONVEYANCE OF REAL PROPERTY WHEREAS, Independence Ten, a partnership under the laws of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner ") is the Owner of certain real property, a part of which is located in the city of Brooklyn Center and a part of which is located in the city of Brooklyn Park and which property is legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1, Shingle Creek Manor. Also: The South 12 feet of the West 3/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of ec i S C Oil 2 a 8 Township 11 R an g e an e 21 P � � lying Easterly and adjacent to the center line of State Highway #152 (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property "); and WHEREAS, a portion of the Subject Property is subject to an easement running in favor of the city of Brooklyn Center, dated September 17, 1979, filed with the Hennepin County Register of Deeds as document no. 5411829 (hereinafter referred to as the "Easement "); and • WHEREAS, the Ow wishes ashes to sell the Subject Property c o et t � p y o Creekside Group, LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership (hereinafter referred to as the "Vendee "); and WHEREAS, the Easement requires consent by the city of Brooklyn Center to any conveyance of that part of the Subject Property which is subject to the Easement, which consent may not y be unreasonably withheld by the City; and WHEREAS, the city ouncil ha s s determined that there i Y s no reason to decline to consent to the conveyance of the Subject Property from the Owner to the Vendee; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that consent is hereby ranted to conveyance ance Y � of the Subject Pro from Owner Y ] perry O e to Vendee as described above. D ate Mayor ATTEST: Clerk CLL9873p BR291 -4 Z ROV8 0LES LEEZI9 : 0I NaAVNO 'R A03NN2N:W0NA Otebt 9E- 60 —NVr The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member • _, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • CLL9S736 BR292 -4 E 3OVCI OtEB4EEZt9 -0I N3AVNO T AQ3NNRM WONA tt =bt 96- bO-NVr