Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 04-29 PCM MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION April 29, 2004 CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Willson at 7:31 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Tim Willson, Commissioners Graydon Boeck, Rex Newman, Sean Rahn, and Dianne Reem, were present. Also present were Secretary to the Planning Commission/Planning and Zoning Specialist Ronald Warren, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. Stephen Erdmann was absent and excused. Tim Roche was absent and unexcused. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — MARCH 25, 2004 There was a motion by Commissioner Newman, seconded by Commissioner Reem, to approve the minutes of the March 25, 2004 meeting as submitted. The motion passed. Commissioner Boeck abstained as he was not at the meeting. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION Chair Willson explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. DISCUSSION ITEM• REQUEST TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A MICRO BREWERY Mr. Warren described the request from Mr. Omar Ansari, Sparky Abrasives, which is a request to consider an amendment to the City's Zoning Ordinance to allow the operation of a microbrewery at 4811 Dusharme Drive in Brooklyn Center. Mr. Warren explained the current use of the property and the details surrounding Mr. Ansari's request. He also stated that currently manufacturing of these beverages is not allowed anywhere in the city, however, if a brewery is to be allowed, the I -2 (General Industry) zoning district and the I -1 (Industrial Park) district would be the appropriate zones. Mr. Warren noted that because Mr. Ansari has made a formal request to modify the Zoning Ordinance, the City must respond within 60 days. The proposal was received on April 15, 2004, therefore a disposition should be rendered no later than June 14, 2004 by the City Council. Commissioner Newman asked for clarification on the differences between a microbrewery and a brewpub. The differences between these two facilities and the production and consumption of beer was discussed. 4 -29 -04 Page 1 Commissioner Rahn inquired about the possibility of tours on the site and how that would be handled. Mr. Warren explained that "off sale" liquor is not allowed in Brooklyn Center unless it is through a municipal establishment. He further explained that the consumption of liquor is not allowed without a full service restaurant. The concept of tours being offered with the consumption of beer would have to be addressed at a later date. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A MICRO BREWERY There was a motion by Commissioner Newman, seconded by Commissioner Boeck to open the public hearing regarding a request to amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow the operation of a microbrewery at 7:56 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Willson called for comments from the public. Mr. Omar Ansari, 1445 Tyrol Trail, Golden Valley, introduced himself and asked for questions from the Commissioners. He also explained that he has thoroughly researched Minnesota laws governing microbreweries and his establishment will follow these guidelines. The Commissioners inquired about deliveries, parking and hours of operation. Mr. Ansari explained his plans for the business operation and the reasons for his proposal. The Commissioners also discussed if this use would be allowed in other zoning districts. Mr. Warren explained how such a use could be allowed in other districts. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Newman, seconded by Commissioner Boeck to close the public hearing regarding a request to amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow the operation of a microbrewery at 8:16 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. The chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissoners. The Commission members further discussed approval of the ordinance amendment request. ACTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A MICRO BREWERY There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Rahn to recommend to the City Council approval of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 Regarding the Manufacturing of Beer, Wine and Distilled Alcoholic Beverages in both the 1 -1 and 1 -2 zoning districts. Voting in favor: Chair Willson, Commissioner Boeck, Newman, Rahn and Reem. Voting against: None The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Warren informed Mr. Ansari that the matter would be presented to the City Council at the May 10, 2004 meeting. 4 -29 -04 Page 2 OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Newman, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:24 p.m. Chair Recorded and transcribed by: Rebecca Crass 4 -29 -04 Page 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Ronald A. Warren, Planning Commission Secretary SUBJECT: Request to Amend Zoning Ordinance DATE: April 26, 2004 Attached is a written proposal from Mr. Omar Ansari, Sparky Abrasives, 4811 Dusharme Drive, Brooklyn Center, requesting an amendment to the City's Zoning Ordinance to allow the operation of a microbrewery in their building. The property in question is zoned I -2 (General Industry) and is located at the northwest end of the Dusharme Drive cul de sac, which is an extension of 48 Avenue North. Attached for the Commission's review is an area map showing the I -2 zoning district, highlighting the Ansari property and also an aerial photo of the site. Attached as well are copies of Section 35 -330 and 35 -331 regarding the allowable uses in the I -1 and I -2 zoning distrits. Mr. Ansari believes their family owned building would be an excellent location for a microbrewery where they would manufacture and distribute beer to local restaurants. He notes that their business has changed over time from a manufacturing operation that at one time employed 80 people to one that is currently downsizing to the point where they have space available where a microbrewery could be operated. The problem is the Zoning Ordinance does not allow a brewery use in the I -2 zoning district. In fact, the zoning ordinance specifically excludes the manufacturing of malt or malt liquors in both the I -1 and I -2 zones. Nowhere in the city is such a use allowed. The wholesale distribution of beer, wine and distilled alcoholic beverages is allowed in the I -1 and I -2 zones, but not the manufacturing of these items. The reason manufacturing of these beverages is not allowed anywhere in the city is not clear, however, it was noted that when this ordinance was written, almost 40 years ago, microbreweries did not, for the most part, exist. Breweries generally require large areas of land, a large supply of water and sewage system capable of handling their discharges. Odors and smells associated with the industry might also have been considered a negative. These may have been the reasons why such a use was not authorized anywhere in the City of Brooklyn Center, Mr. Ansari, in his written submission, reviews the manufacturing process and brewery issues relating to water usage, sewer capacities and odors. The Public Works Director, Community Development Director and City Manager have been provided with the written proposal and have been requested to provide their comments. None have been received to this date. It should be noted that any such operation would be required to meet PCA, EPA and other environmental, noise or odor regulations. It appears our utility system could handle such an operation. If a brewery is to be allowed anywhere in the city, the I -2 (General Industry) zoning district, and perhaps the I -1 (Industrial Park) district, would be the appropriate zones. An argument could be made that the City should accommodate such a use somewhere in the city. The Planning Commission should review the written material presented and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding this matter. Because Mr. Ansari has made a formal request to modify the Zoning Ordinance, the City must respond to this request within 60 days. The proposal was received on April 15, 2004, therefore, a disposition should be rendered no later than June 14, 2004 by the City Council. Attached is an Ordinance Amendment that would allow the manufacturing of beer, wine and distilled alcoholic beverages in the I -2 (General Industry) zoning district for the Commission's consideration if the Commission is inclined to make a favorable recommendation. We will be prepared to discuss this matter further at the April 29, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. I