HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010 04-29 PCP PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
APRIL 29, 2010
REGULAR SESSION
1. Call to Order: 7:00 p.m.
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Minutes - April 15, 2010
4. Chairperson's Explanation
The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to
hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes
recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in
these matters.
5. Vanguard Construction Inc 2010 -007
PUD Amendment and Site & Building approval for construction of a 6,757 sq. ft. multi -
tenant office building.
6. Discussion Items
• Review of Section 35 -800 Administrative Use Permits — Outdoor Sales Markets
for Minnesota Grown Produce, Fruits, Plants Flowers, Herbs
• April 26, 2010 City Council Update /Actions on Planning Commission Items
• Update on activities associated with the Planning issues identified in the 2030
Comprehensive Plan Update:
o Bass Lake Road and 57 Avenue Trail Connections
o Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor
o 53` Avenue Corridor (West of the Bellvue Trail and Streetscape
Improvements)
7. Adjournment
LOGISMap Output Page Page I of I
1 PLANNING COMMISSION
APPLICATION NO. 2010-007
............
.............
iDTH AVE N ............ . .
70TH AVE N
........... . ................................. ............. _. .
J.
....... ..... . .... . ......................... .
.. ......... .... ...........
................
....................
----- -----
>
. ......... ........
. .......... . ....................
Z
------ - ------------ .........
.. ...... .. . .......... . .. . ............. . .... ..........
.............. ......... .........
j ... . ......
L .......... . . ... .. . ........... . . . .....
69 " AVE N
. ... . .. ....... ...................... ........................ ................ .............. .
. .
............ ......... ............. ------ . ..... .. . .......... .................. . . -\
http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS—ArcIMS/ims?ServiceNarne=bc—LOGISMap_OV&ClientVersio... 4/28/2010
Application Filed on 4 -1 -10
City Council Action Should Be
Taken By 5 -30 -10 (60 Days)
Planning Commission Information Sheet
Application No. 2010 -007
Applicant: Vanguard Construction
Location: 6940 Brooklyn Boulevard (Lot 1, Block 1, Johnco Addition) Vacant Lot
within the Boulevard Market PUD)
Request: Planned Unit Development Amendment and SIte and Building Plan
Review
The applicant, Vanguard Construction, is seeking a Planned Unit Development Amendment to
construct a 6,757 sq. ft. multi- tenant retail/commercial building on a 38,707 sq. ft. lot within the
Boulevard Market commercial PUD located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of
Brooklyn Boulevard and 69 Avenue.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
On June 1, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2002 -75, accepting the Planning
Commission's recommendation to approve the rezoning of 5.6 acres from C -2 (Commerce) and
R -1 (One Family Residence) to PUD /C -2 (Commerce).
The general development plan of this PUD included the planned development of four
commercial /retail buildings comprising a total of 34,228 sq. ft. as follows:
Lot 1 — Conceptual approval of a 3,960 sq. ft. building (SA Service Station with car
wash) with 12 parking stalls
Lot 2 — 4,230 sq. ft. restaurant, retail, office building with 46 parking stalls
Lot 3 — 21, 500 sq. ft. multi -tenant commercial building with 134 parking stalls
Lot 4 — 4,538 sq. ft. Culver's Restaurant with 39 parking stalls
On August 26, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2002 -111, which accepted the
Planning Commission's recommendation on a PUD amendment to allow the construction of a
revised layout for a Super America convenience store /gas station/car wash on Lot 1.
The revised layout included a 3,958 sq. ft. building with 16 parking stalls and located the car
wash on the north side of the convenience store. Additionally, two curb cuts were provided from
the internal access drive.
4 -29 -10
Page 1
ZONING
As noted, the property was zoned PUD /C -2 in 2002 with the adoption of Ordinance No. 2002 -07.
Attached is the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions associated with this PUD.
The PUD ordinance requires the site and building plan approvals are required and that these
plans shall be in substantial compliance with the approved development plan. Substantial
compliance is defined as:
Substantial compliance shall mean that buildings, parking areas and roads are in
essentially the same location as previously approved; the number of dwelling units, if
any, has not increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; the floor area of
nonresidential areas has not been increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; no
building has been increased in the number of floors; open space has not been
decreased or altered from its original design or use, and lot coverage of any individual
building has not been increased or decreased by more than 10 percent.
It also provides for the processing of minor and major amendments to the approved master
development plan.
Any major amendment to the development plan may be approved by the City Council
following the same notice and hearing procedures specified in this section. An
amendment shall be considered major if it involves any change greater than that
permitted by Subdivision 5d of this section. Changes which are determined by the City
Council to be minor may be made if approved by the Planning Commission after such
notice and hearing as may be deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission.
This plan amendment involves the reorientation and enlargement of the total commercial square
footage by 7.4% and is consequently considered a major plan amendment.
PROPOSED SITE AND BUILDING PLAN
The proposed amendment provides for the re- orientation of the building to face Brooklyn
Boulevard with an enlarged foot print (112 ft. X 60 ft.) vs. the (100 ft. X 45 ft.). This location
respects the sight lines and the general visibility of the larger commercial building on Lot 3.
Additionally, the plan proposes to remove two of the three curb cuts on the internal access drive
which adjoins the SA site.
The additional 12 ft. width and 15 ft. in depth allows the developer the potential to offer five
tenant bays and continues to provide a drive up window for a potential restaurant (illustrated as
an 1800 sq. ft. tenant space on the north side of the building
Additionally, the plan proposes to remove two of the three curb cuts on the internal access drive,
changed the number of potential store fronts from four to five and revised the roof lines to match
4 -29 -10
Page 2
the commercial building on Lot 3.
The architectural treatment of the building includes a decorative rockface concrete block along
the base (lower 3 ft.) of the building, a pre -cast concrete sill with face brick extending to a height
of 12 ft. The remaining 6 ft. is EIFS with a colored band to offset the brick. The end cap units
have a roof line which extends an additional 32 inches with a decorative EIFS cornice and a
prefinished aluminum cap.
An additional architectural feature identified on the building elevations are piers with
decorative /accenting lights that complement the elevated roof lines and window placements on
the front and sides of the building.
The applicant proposes the same architectural treatment on all four sides of the building.
COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE
Building Setbacks Ordinance Proposed
Front Yard 35 ft. 35 ft.
East 10 ft. 14 ft.
South 10 ft. 65ft.
West
10 ft. 75 ft.
Parking Setback Ordinance Proposed
North 15 ft. 15 ft.
East 10 ft. * 2.7 ft. /7 ft. to curb
South 10 ft. * 5 ft. to curb
West 10 ft. * 5 ft. to curb
*PUD adjusted
Parking Stalls 46
5.5 per 1,000 sq. ft. 37 stalls
UTILITIES
The proposed grading and utility plan is consistent with the approved utility plan, with the
exception of minor adjustments to the location of two catch basins within the parking lot.
Sanitary sewer and municipal water are provided from the existing stubs that were installed with
the initial site development. (Centered portion of the east lot line.)
LANDSCAPE PLAN
The landscape plan provides for the planting of three Red Splendor decorative trees along the
southern boulevard consistent with the approved landscape plan. The plan shows the five
existing Spruce trees to remain within the 70` boulevard area (previously shown to include two
4 -29 -10
Page 3
Autumn Blaze Ash trees) and now includes foundation plantings on the sides and rear facing of
the buildings, the SW corner of the lot and northern entry. The western boulevard to the internal
access road is shown as a green strip.
All areas are shown to be included in a site irrigation system.
The developer has proposed to donate the two Autumn Blaze Ash trees to the City.
ACCESS
The site plan proposes the elimination of the two curb cuts that were shown on the southern
portion of the lot and the enlargement of the northern most curb cut (previously an exit only for
the drive up window) to a full movement access point.
Preliminary reviewed by the City Engineer of the site plan has included concern on the location
of this driveway and its proximity to 70 Avenue. It is recommended that the access drive is
shifted to the south by approximately 30 ft. (i.e. the opening to displace the northern four parking
stalls and relocation of a light pole).
Additionally, there is concern on the turning radius of the drive thru lane as it rounds the NE
corner of the building. The applicant is requested to demonstrate that this movement is workable
with traffic /vehicular turning templates.
LIGHTING /TRASH
The site plan illustrates the location of four 30 ft. light poles and the building elevation identifies
the use of decorative light fixtures to ascent the building front and sides. The plan identifies the
location of the trash enclosure adjoining the southeast wall of the building. The applicant will be
required to submit details on the lighting and the trash enclosure to assure compliance with the
PUD plans and city codes.
SIGNAGE
The PUD approval included two freestanding development signs to be incorporated in the corner
landscape areas at 69 and 70 Avenues and Brooklyn Boulevard and a freestanding monument
type identification sign for Culver's and Super America to be located on their respective sides of
the Brooklyn Boulevard entrance. The monument signs shall not exceed 12 ft. in height and 145
sq. ft. in area. No other freestanding identification signs shall be permitted with the PUD.
There is a development sign within the landscape node at 69 Avenue which identifies Brooklyn
Market. It does not appear that a sign has been installed at the 70 Avenue node.
The proposed wall mounted signage areas identified on the building elevation provides for
approximately 10 percent of the wall area per tenant area for business identification. The sign
ordinance limits wall mounted signs not to exceed 15percent of the wall area on each of its
exterior walls.
4 -29 -10
Page 4
The applicant has been informed that the freestanding sign identified in the southwest corner of
the site is not allowed.
With respect to site signage, staff will be discussing signage issues associated with temporary
and portable signage that has previously been allowed by an Administrative Use Permit. This
review will provide an opportunity to review the potential options to address business signage
and identification of promotional activities and events.
RECOMMENDATION
This proposal is an amendment to the Planned Unit Development approval granted for the entire
Westbrook Development site (Boulevard Market). As a Planned Unit Development amendment,
the proposal is required to follow the procedures required for the original Planned Unit
Development. This requires a public hearing, which has been scheduled. Notices of the
Planning Commission's consideration have been sent and a notice has also been published in the
Brooklyn Sun/Post.
The plan is consistent with the architectural themes, landscaping, and parking standards
approved with the Westbrook Planned Unit Development proposal and developed as the
Boulevard Market.
A draft Planning Commission resolution is offered for the Commission's consideration. This
resolution outlines the Commission's consideration of this matter and also recommended
considerations and conditions for approval.
4 -29 -10
Page 5
i
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 29, 2010
TO: Gary Eitel, Business and Development Director
FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Public Works Director /City Engineer
SUBJECT: Site Plan Review — Boulevard Market, 6940 Brooklyn Boulevard
Public Works Department staff reviewed the following preliminary documents submitted for
review for the proposed Brooklyn Center Retail Development:
• Building plans dated March 28, 2010
• Site plans dated March 26, 2010
Subject to staff approval, the site plan must be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the referenced plans, unless modified by the staff recommended conditions
below:
1. A development agreement is required that includes all conditions of the project approval,
subject to the final site plan approval by the City Engineer.
2. All plan sheets must be certified by a Minnesota licensed engineer for the type of work
being certified (e.g. site and utility plans must be certified by a civil engineer).
3. Final civil plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the
issuance of permits.
4. A lighting plan with photometrics must be submitted.
5. Plan approval is exclusive of all permanent traffic signage requirements that are subject
to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances.
6. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities must conform to the
City of Brooklyn Center standard specifications and details. The City's standard details
must be included in the plans.
7. Upon project completion, the applicant must submit an as built survey of the property,
improvements and utility service lines and structures prior to release of the performance
guarantee.
8. Pedestrian routes and connections to and from the building and the site are poor and
generally non - existent. Applicant must revise plans to address this issue.
9. Plans must be developed from of a certified survey and included with the plan set. As-
built plans were not received for the area development and remain outstanding.
Boulevard Market, 6940 Brooklyn Blvd.
Page 2of2
Site Plan Memo, April 29, 2010
Sheet C -1
10. Show internal vehicle turning movement layouts for the drive -thm. It is anticipated there
may be issues with the turning movements pertaining to the 90 degree corner and the
approach to the drive -thru window location.
11. Align the site access along the westerly driveway with the northerly access to Super
America. This will provide better stacking /storage area within the external driveway that
is needed at the intersection with 70 Avenue.
12. B612 curb and gutter must be provided around all driving and parking areas.
13. The applicant must provide temporary on -site traffic control signs as deemed appropriate
and necessary by the City Engineer. All traffic control must be in accordance with the
MMUTCD standards.
Sheet C -2
14. Sanitary sewer and water service locations and connections must be verified prior to
construction.
15. The site must meet the current watershed commission storm water and infiltration
standards. Provide drainage calculations demonstrating these standards are met.
16. The property owner must enter into an easement and agreement for maintenance and
inspection of utility and storm drainage systems prior to the issuance of permits.
17. The applicant must obtain an NPDES permit from the MPCA.
18. Plans must include a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ( SWPPP) subject to approval
by the City Engineer. If an MPCA NPDES permit is not be required, the SWPPP must
still meet and include all standard NPDES requirements and prescriptions, regardless.
Sheet L -1
19. An underground irrigation system must be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate
site maintenance.
The aforementioned comments are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant
at the time of this review. Subsequent approval of the final site plans may require additional
modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of the water
system, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, final grading and geometric design as established by the
City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final plans.
Other guarantees and site development conditions such as site plan as -built drawings, site
performance agreement, financial guarantee, etc. will be prescribed prior to the issuance of
permits.
WEngineering\Development & Planning\ACT VE Development Projects\Boulevard Market - 2010 \100429_Site Plan Review Memo.doc
1.o t 1 7, f?lk 2 \
i 4
89.4 2'00 " E 697.
16717
U
_ _ ... ...... — —
1 :.
11 20'R \ v-
�!
177
3'R 12�R
f�f! 'r 1 �?C �'n h! 31 �?l 5 O:R 2 Jf�
r I i l i R 1 4
i
I i 9 4 I -
I VAN ACCESSIBLE
HANDICAP SIGN - -
' I _ PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP
21
I o' N - f -- ' F•! �i
18' 1
2.7'
- RUCTION; LIMITS _ 14
i I i II �
4 - {'
SIDEWALK
CONCRETE
- m
II I
s
L �
2.5'R
j I I BITUMINOUS TRASH ENCLOSURE II O
PAVEMENT C
�i 1
S'R 9 . 3'R
5'R
I1 I I r TYP. m C. �-
i i 1
_. U� �7� , \ �� O R'
MONUMENT SIGN 1 48 I �
F
L_ . ��� __ . .. _ l....,.. .. �..._ - _. - __.... .... —
r-
SITE AREA 38,707: S.F., 0.89 ACRES
BUILDING AREA: 6,757 S.F.
TOTAL NUMBER OF, PARKING
STALLS PROVIDED: 46
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING
STALLS REQUIRED: 37
5.5 PER 1000 SO. FT. GSF
NUM7':R OF HANDICAP
STAL I.S PRoVIDED: 2
NUMBER OF HANDICAP
STALLS RE(. D: 2
VJ
II
w F
0
r
z
r�
I
° I
o
0
N
O
Z
0
�
BROOKLYN CENTER RETAIL DEVELOPMENT
I Y NETUL Ow
MWOKLYM /OULFVAKD • 70TH AVENUE WW7M
SMOKLYN CENTEK, UN
SITE PLAN
N
LLLLO
I O
rJ
O
O
I� O
(D
CL
- -- -- M
CL
3
CD
Ert
r+
O
r+
CD
v
CD
M
0
CD
iig'� DESIGN �II�II�p
Attachment Four 2002 Approved PUD Development Plan
-- - - - - --
BROOKLY
— 70th Aywxm North CENTER
— — — — — n c f — -- —
-- —. ..- -•"" --
RETAIL
r- - - - -- — - ---- -- - 1
it
\\ t r ! I BROOKLYN CENTER
\\ \• \\ j tlRp� tool I! I 4 NISI 1 i • , I 4 1 N N E 9 0 T A
�tE MSD I I
\\ \ ♦ \ \ I I 1 W
r 1
,\ \\ \ ' ! I I ,1 \`
\\ \
\\
\ \ \ \C-
IN
ARCH
` `\ \ \ ` ,. :r ',:. 1 F =;f 'f::7f:•
RVAIL
nyao sr
- ��: ai'r`s _• ;-
noon :. \ \, �' .�;:' � ➢ i r� '= ' {i•irr• ftE MOO ::r�:. I 'c v'�
U 1
.rr r.,rmef ecfuona i .. -... -+ --
�� co,raw ♦♦ \ \ Z, ; '\ � :er - '::Y1.�.: - - ':'l:' ! _ -
rl.l fI01 (L(••11rw �� 1lIR OY,• I..00II lCIIO'1 - -- '� _
u0[Mwwf frlfl(r111t Jalr I.wwO nRA \\ \ \\ •• i, ` .• \ —. ^ .
G1Fier:u3 ea.eff R
NOTES \ \ ; \ \ \\ ♦ \ I _,�:�.
uruwlsn L•nw \ `� �\ �.� ♦ -r- —r ' J: :.r: antes r�r.oartmw com I
� � 1. orlulaOa fowl a rlq rvw M[ ro Irtt v aw wo ...... •.
A=M rsn ro a r
WMMC
CI OF I.WOII OrtwO, 1.0 O tUlOO Y1LLlf 1010 O,MO1_fi —
-. l.s` ae�f slrterlaw t Mww10 ttwlf ,e .e tt.rm wnl ,..• •Et wttt IMr10 \ \ �. �.- .... .'.
lot. • rrr0 SM . e \ \ �\ — '::: r::.:. ^:' cr:'::'r
fr r
••+. ^• roc .' P-M fmrc r &L wa tt a MGM \ ` \ y �' :.::.'::.':.•::. I w.
wu foll.f a wra o.fnlf raclltn
» mo+".• • .a. a twm nury r♦wlm wr onnorrnr f•a n -1 • f-a ♦ \\ `\
.mlllar mlr.r. ,»� ,wlwf R„1.1.1,: ` ` _..�. ;'" ASSOCIATES
r' ro.al.l,• f[p11Elr 0lrlln Any"W: ac snot Ial taO,r ■.n rro f r[ s.a Iat n c ..
Uwr frrolun fuw• r.e orv.m a _ ••a.af ...wr for. -- . --
" i ° .
rOR wvu ' =' "—
p� — "` " Ca Ad Na 130) '-
68th Aviee North � Y — — -- .IOOMVWC
cmwl..rt rour iar.enwr wt .• t a — — ue1'nortlrnt
-- �~ -- -- --- -- "M trot m f is - -- -- \�- -- —
1 (/ tut roll
.rlf•r. - -1.11
2002 Revised Development Plan — SA Site
AtLaCEE>JECUt . Eurteeu
N
r C I ■Y N.I kY �OOI. I e..w.
1l
AN
/ _•' SO - .f. 'SA SUKRA(CRICA' LDGO DETAIL t SUP ERAMEFJCA
�[b - ._.. .....
A!'�� - - �� `mil • ....••�� . �{�,.
/ r o .! + "' <'• '' J c, • _ ..._ ..,...,.. - -
o
t _- w�
I I8.12 SO. FI. PRICE; 1.0. GOMOS1 SIG
ELEVATION 'E N `
r
r e
N /1 V 256- - - - -- -
�= - � - � , Speedy WasH 4 '
- I
UPERAMERICXI V- . I,.,1 E([VAI[ON
`. FJI[oTNL SICN [LEVAI - C" I 'a
s �
:7.1T.'L'J'L'S7'Tl'Ci •••• •'•'. ' 2
O •. +RO E(EYIr ION !-
UrN'r'V SIR IVIuG 1N1A11 -
P 71[On!G [N E[EV11I(M
3192
z� 4M
3fl2 -3
' z
70th Avenue North
Q' w
N89'42'00 "E 697.29 — -
--- - - - - -- -- ..—
i50 i5 - --
t. J 167./7 ' -__ _ �_ --- 200. fS___ - �—
I.,,
x rR 7
x I I `caysmucnd uers E(
f
3 rEOrsrm.x cwe e.w � I -• _
.00
2 I N S o W
ca "smucnox Erma I • • p d
.' CONGER �
\ _ W
. 7
I
� nuxalS IR.9. CxCLOSURE I C N
KYCxI F E O r q d.
5 . e
M Z tl
Lj
Z Z
' -. - `wauucNr nsx 169 48 . i .... Y
�\ .I.�o
JJ a
SITE PLAN NOTES: La
SITE DATA: SITE IMPROVEMENTS LEGEND:
.0 o-ucxsroNS .ec io r.CE a eaEaxc .w /G SITE AREA 38.707 S.F.. 0.89 ACRES eiru.rxoua r.KUCNr aeNs
r.cE or care. 6,757 S.F.
]. cac To r FFo Eo BUILDING AREA: �� caNCS[R r.KNErn
c , - TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING
5. YL cas E cues uq come .PMEEM io STALLS PROVIDED: 46
coxcecR w.E. sreuE e< SE—TED e.. I/� .¢x eerx coxcenE cwe . wrtrzs
a .nsoN ,onr TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING 37
.. c-- ,o v cues • f . wxcN STALLS REQUIRED: sari coNCeErE care a currG (ouRw.0
CNNK.FS TvrE arwU N.K • FM (5) Feat s.a ne eao so. n. wF =`O
1 PN's' n O N NUMBER OF HANDICAP .a Ecru re,u.c 5o r N Eoo w.R
9- siesmc T— K ' '¢" wrxR. STALLS PROVIDED:
e. cwe a cunt swu x ear: ixcex.E ro SnE.
uNEas c.E ao wr rs o— NUMBER OF HANDICAP G
'eaNx SNNL CWRY MIN iM Cm a STALLS REQUIRED: 2 ....... ti
). MadtLVN CCxne Fx J.EEMW a1.WF.eM FiNC 6 � _
sw.iE e< xeroeuEO Ducat Naves .neo+co � c
n iNC cm a eaoaE.N ttNrze.
It. •u omK carts un EoraNC To x NTo Exo.
ire BR uuaarsKiivcir[Nr � T.E15 TD K
lCAtit N Imm KORTN
SITE PLAN ar
70th Avenue North
tees N89'42'00 "'E 697.29
r.
16277
I` .7
�"6i ss al nz
�.dL
La
I I I I�', E�wS)wU[riOw L, �t-
se.x
� I F
I I W w.rze sc slues µo
N e' M CLS
MITE9 AIMCE I li H
$ I z
S).9 9N � tKP
W
- -y63 G
z
169.48
o
GRADING NOTES LEGEND: mG
,. suw.croa ro .cwn eEncwue� euwraa n9ne ro saM ExKrwU cartoua 9LVnoewe
a cowsreunon. _ wao9nsEO wwroua
Ew�LLa. r.eaa x, audw coiLm.naL ro apE9 ro aorzc.xrx
KR apowf. _ � _ �� cpLr�pE rtr,cc
5pw5 .part ro SVF110EeE 1K4 P
6: w9ro rLw E 9oa Lde CCIgM ro K Me ea co Ka MLanrnwi d Me) or Of CVae
yygqpppp r� .reaarto [owL) a:orzo«iuE MroM.
rO91S R - >� o.c.. 1. SaE Mr MLM�L rat COr6rAlCMa SwLL R dSP09[e �)
W aRRll IM
R ��c��"� ort .w w¢wao .. ME arse so Nano. _ _ ueuE
�( ua waa sr«u covL..nw rK cm a eaoon.w cc)rrtw
.rar 1� ,`SLR s. Lo�wrt ur o.on ro ) K zrurr or carsrwucrow raortcmw. rca rnr on.n
(( 1 c cartwcra n Ms9aseLC rox oE�ourw a 9Erwr.
E.K)M eaouro ; ^4,Y GO ar ri E96re4 sr9ucruMZ .new arzarcM .+rn Kw g. r.EaocwL+ noco 9am,o ..
� ^„d,' ° 4 O� ) u�n.nar�csnaaeLC rae nrt MW9K . orsr°srE "wAa n
Li
T 1f F or rK rsbrwc ertw.�aus. enuuran srou e[ vM M [o er u
oa ,ua r�wrMEMO a srarcwr tmtz. rrt srLUi x wn mace 9 -a-e)
usEO ow ertu.ra+orrs cxc naw ro nncr.w. row nsnwc .r•,r � b .
EROSION CONTROL FENCE ca.as.
e. cowraic� s � .oionrc�raon� �s a c rmn�s e)mr
mwnr.naL s MswowveEE row Muw.a a .0 sr9nc x MsrowveL[ row ri wrLmrs ro nrovcwnrs
EM)Sid Cartw0. wrE11M15 smxnMS rw.r occuL wz . Mzur a rwac .cr.9r¢t
9. wrt� s no uo a [[a i so xi) M .0 a�w[nars. 7 f0• aC Nr ^ — 2
V
N:ALf N raET Hom L
GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN
PLANTING NOTES
• A`q
70th Avenue North
. N89 "42'00 "E 69729
soD 767.7 sco _ --- 200.
a -s, :s -cr .....rz,.w s«•. cae., .� rm urz m ,°. i � ; 3 _
x •^ F {T 3
v
1 W .[na,w rtd irvsruc m.e,w.ccrd «•+..[u, a.[.no.
3 Y" ,
a p p I p - � ..rws .•°. m ....vw, •m mm..rt .srrura.
R1 N b
I N 4 ~
a z
Z W
6 CL
� o
0
-i
5 -B[ 5_e5 I W u
N u.
m e LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE
ci
U � W
69.4 `u "+` Z 'o d
— —
U
- o �7.' �.ax[vsicvc[ e• 0
N89 - 4200 "E 775.71 c °+ :> ^„�.'^eu' w BlP . 01.E �p
m&ola J
: s .,uwrtx rsw w.. Rat S1R
e[..saws
titi
[ MSKD
SNRI! "JITDID DETAIL TREE PLANTMID DETAIL
w 'w w L -1
eeua r[ FM Imy"
LANDSCAPE PLAN
00L_ Y
�o■Y 'a w � Aa+.. w.a M r
fM Y ■LiM wwu."..'OVV Y0+1LR■ -u � oas . �o/ ■ �.ax��ao�w.'
Y Mww y.pr YT.•J .rn �`.�. u� �'O![L��'�'Y'�a'�i
- yAT■.� .I]rJ.w � , l � OsQ a Oyl/ -� � O.A. q�U 1uw
,.i �o...uim � a a■'+.o.w � aow. u� .oc.o O
[0 -wt-[ M anu aw ■■. 1,1.u+Ni'Yi .r.• -w ni
m11W Lwl YY.� VaCT■ .w w/u lT0 �O �R ■ iT4Y Lu -Vf-f
Ou1l M0001■11'YY.OI
�o .w . ans v+ •+ 53dA1 11YM
Tr. u.w
Yi'I001• "JOO F — — — — — — —
go
rn II I I s
rn
�o az z I V II I
I III
z D R ( a ■�.
COD
a
�'�� I II s .F.■ I
•
_ u..w�• - mm u...ai .n
FED
i C/] �a■ I I R i .�i. � I I I
■
N 8 L 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 =�)
_ cas ura cw.aa - Wa 9 <
.T tafa�] �,A,�j.. - ] �� — .ua .ronn ..w -Wa.O
eemv.e. eoc. epees
W VAT – FRONT #?
rn -e' }
Q A g C D ls
,.... , ..l..'.. MATERIAL LEGEND 61
FACE BRICK
- � rrn.n• .eneD .eeoc.c . ee..n r.a.. n�J mms.
EIFS.
ew a
wl cDn ear
- _ CONCRETE BLOCK ; p er
.ce cec. elm ..ce eADC w..l.c+uo .m.
m e reow� l enuweD c a)e . reu+l. W W z
PRECAST. CONC. BILL BLOCK
D C B A .ma... r,.w.n.wn ,,.. caoe unul DD.D,
saoOOc ...DC! aoo. rmm ...s,.e.rl w coos W
.a� ru soot clnr.ol.a. F.. N
CANVAS AUN W S D Z ? ZO
�•''� ! C0.Dl, .D. eLODC �!�! V
y ALtHMUPI - PARAP P ET CA ro ae W MEAL DOORFRAME . DOIINBPOJTS W
.e cat eSeDS UIINDOW FRAMER
m e wW.Cll.le fdPe .OR e�D IDMO+
MrDpYD .ur—n G..e YlY
•.{)Iee.l1 DLOFI.e .MR.T0 wlO1M `Oe 1wY{1
EXTERIOR LK,NTMG
8 7
e � . i .R.. Wa ..RLD fLlQl9
.J.e .ccoD e.)o • ura a art esusn
3
�.0 4.Cf rCrr� 1100[ .! tr
Wl O Ole r w.Y! CM[d[! n W I
iro �rWl.rn.! ,nnl11�DPO1Nn - ...e.0 ..J
T - A -200
-S C
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS
AND RESTRICTIONS
THIS DECLARATION made this j-':3 day of .fir l/ , 2002, by Johnco
LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (hereinafter the "Declarant ");
WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the real property described as Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4,
Block 1, Johnco Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Subject Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is subject to certain zoning and land use restrictions
imposed by the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota ( "City") in connection with the rezoning.of the
Subject Property from the zoning classifications C -2 (Commerce) and R -1 (One Family Residential)
to PUD /C -2 as provided in City Resolution No. 2002 -75 adopted on June 10, 2002; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the redevelopment of the Subject Property, Declarant has
applied to the City for rezoning for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow construction and
maintenance of a 34,228 square foot, four building, mixed use commercial/retail development on
the Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, the City has approved such PUD rezoning on the basis of the determination of
the City Council of the City that such amendment is acceptable only by reason of the details of the
development proposed and the unique land use characteristics of the proposed use of the Subject
Property; and that but for the details of the development proposed and the unique land
CLL- 217587v2
BR291 -228 1
use characteristics of such proposed use, the PUD rezoning would not have been approved; and
WHEREAS, as a condition of approval of the PUD rezoning, the City has required the
execution and filing of this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (hereinafter the
"Declaration "); and
WHEREAS, to secure the benefits and advantages of such PUD rezoning, Declarant desires
to subject the Subject Property to the terms hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarant declares that the Subject Property is, and shall be, held,
transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions,
hereinafter set forth.
1. The use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to all of the
following:
• All conditions of approval specified by the City Council in Resolution No. 2002 -75
adopted on June 10, 2002, attached as Attachment One;
• Final plat, attached as Attachment Two;
• Title Sheet, attached as Attachment Three;
• Site Plan, attached as Attachment Four;
• Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, attached as Attachment Five;
• Utility Plan, attached as Attachment Six;
• Landscape Plan, attached as Attachment Seven;
• Planting Notes and Details, attached as Attachment Eight;
• Corner Enlargements and Details, attached as Attachment Nine;
• Culver's Exterior Elevations, attached as Attachment Ten;
• East Building Exterior Elevations, attached as Attachment Eleven;
CLL- 217587v2 2
BR291 -228
• North Building Exterior Elevation, attached as Attachment Twelve;
• Lighting Plan, attached as Attachment Thirteen
2. No buildings or structures other than those shown on Attachments One through
Thirteen may be erected or maintained on the Subject Property.
3. Lot 1, Block 1, Johnco Addition may be used for a convenience store /gasoline
station/car wash. Use and development of this lot will require site plan approval and an amendment
to the planned unit development for the Subject Property. No buildings or structures other than
those shown on the amended planned unit development plan and site plan on file with the City
Planner of the City of Brooklyn Center may be constructed or maintained and the use and
development of said lot shall conform to said plans and to the terms of this Declaration.
4. The approval of the PUD authorizes the following variations from the requirements
of Brooklyn Center City Code applicable to the Subject Property:
A. An encroachment of between 5.5 feet and 24 feet into the 35 foot buffer area as
shown on Attachment Four is authorized.
B. A green strip of less than 15 feet along Brooklyn Boulevard and 70th Avenue North
right of way as shown on Attachment Four is authorized.
5. Except as otherwise permitted herein, the use of the Subject Property shall conform
to the zoning regulations of the City of Brooklyn Center applicable to C -2 Districts.
6. Parking requirements for all uses on all lots on the Subject Property are met by
taking into account all parking spaces on all of the lots on the Subject Property in common. Owners
of all lots on the Subject Property will maintain such easements and covenants for access and
CLL- 217587v2 3
BR291 -228
parking as are needed to assure that all parking shown on all approved site plans of lots on the
Subject Property may be used in common. No change in use of any of the lots on the Subject
Property will be permitted that causes a deficiency in parking spaces required by Brooklyn Center
City Code, taking into account parking spaces for all uses and all parking spaces on all lots on the
Subject Property.
7. The Subject Property may be developed and used only in accordance with
paragraphs 1 through 7 of this Declaration unless the owner first secures approval by the Brooklyn
Center City Council of an amendment to the Planned Unit Development Plan for the Subject
Property and to this Declaration or a rezoning to a zoning classification that permits such other
development and use.
8. The obligations and restrictions of this Declaration run with the land of the Subject
Property and shall be enforceable against the Declarant, its successors and assigns, by the City
- I
acting through its City Council. This Declaration may be amended from time to time by a written
amendment executed by the City and the owner or owners of the lot or lots to be affected by said
amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned as duly authorized agents, officers, or
representatives of Declarant have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first
above written.
DECLARANT
CLL- 217587v2 4
BR291 -228
TARA L LANDR
Notary Public
STATE OF 1 n 7) �� ) Allnnewts
Gc�nm, lm Jan 31
SS
COUNTY OF C(J /1r�
�J
h
The foregoing instrument was executed this ' day of US 2000, by
1 11 wig- ]Se n , a chief manager of Johnco LLC, a Minnesota limi d liability company,
on behalf of the limited liability company.
N Public
CLL- 217587v2 5
BR291 -228
APPROVED BY THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
By
Its M
By
Its City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this —Ht day of ALw ►�� 2002,
by Myrna Kragness and Michael McCauley, the Mayor and Manager, respectively,`bf the City of
Brooklyn Center, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of Minnesota, on behalf of the
City.
■
SHARON L. KNUTSON Notary Public
NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
My C4W1 Qn Expires Jan. 31.2005
r
CLL- 217587v2 6
BR291 -228
Member Kay Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption: I
Attachment One
RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -75
RESOLUTION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
APPLICATION NO. 2002 -006 SUBN=D BY WESTBROOK
DEVELOPMENT, INC.
W HEREAS , Planning Commission Application No. 2002 -006 submitted by
Westbrook Development, Inc. proposes rezoning from C -2 (Commerce) and R -1 (One Family
Residence) to PUD /C -2 of a 5.6 acre site located to the northeast quadrant of 69' Avenue North
and Brooklyn Boulevard; and
W 1 REAS, the proposal comprehends the rezoning of the above mentioned
property and development plan approval for a 34,228 sq. ft., four building mixed use
commercial/retail development on the above mentioned site. Said development proposal
includes a 3,960 sq. ft. Super America convenience store /gas station/car wash on the proposed
Lot 1; a 4,230 sq. ft. restaurant, retail or office building on the proposed Lot 2; a 21,500 sq. ft.
multi- tenant commercial building on the proposed Lot 3; and a 4,538 sq. ft. Culver's Restaurant
on the proposed Lot 4; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on May
30, 2002, when a staff report and public testimony regarding the rezoning and site and building
plan were received; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Application.No.
2002 -006 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2002 -02 on May 30, 2002; and
WHEREAS, THE City Council considered Application No. 2002 -006 at its June
10, 2002 meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered this Planned Unit Development
request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating rezonings contained in
Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the Planned Unit Development
ordinance contained in Section 35 -355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the City's Comprehensive
Plan and the Planning Commission's recommendation.
.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that Application No. 2002 -006 submitted by Westbrook Development, Inc. be
approved in light of the following considerations:
1. The Planned Unit Development is compatible with the standards, purposes and
intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance.
2. The Planned Unit Development proposal will allow for the utilization of the land
in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of
comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on
surrounding land.
Attachment One
RESOLUTION N0. 2002 -75
3. The utilization of the property as proposed under this Planned Unit Development
rezoning is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with city
ordinance standards except for allowing a less than 15 ft. greenstrip along the
Brooklyn Boulevard and 70" Avenue North rights of way in the location of a
proposed convenience store /gas station/car wash; and to allow parking and a
portion of a drive lane to encroach in a 35 ft. buffer area located along the east
side of the site. These modifications from the C -2 standards are justified on the
basis of the development being an appropriate redevelopment of this area and that
they are offset or mitigated by various factors contained in the approved site plan.
4. The Planned Unit Development proposal is considered consistent with the
recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the City.
5. The Planned Unit Development proposal appears to be a good long range use of
the existing land and this redevelopment can be considered an asset to the
community.
6. In light of the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating
re- zonings as contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met
and that the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn
Center that Application No. 2002 -006 be approved subject to the following conditions and
considerations:
1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building
Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits.
2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review
and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits.
3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an
amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior
to the issuance of building permits to assure completion of all site
improvements.
4. B-612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all driving and parking
areas.
5. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or on ground mechanical
equipment shall be appropriately screened from view.
6. All buildings shall be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system
to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring
device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances.
RESOLUTION N0. 2002 -75
Attachment One
7. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas
to facilitate site maintenance.
8. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of
the City Ordinances with the exception of freestanding signs authorized by
Condition No. 18.
9. The applicant shall submit an as built survey' of the property ,
improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance
guarantee.
10. The property owner shall enter into an easement and agreement for
maintenance and inspection of utility and storm drainage systems prior to
the issuance of permits.
11. The plans shall be modified to provide:
a. Concrete parking delineators at the end of parking rows north of the
21,500 sq. ft. multi- tenant building and south of the 4,230 sq. ft.
restaurant/retail building.
b. A continuation of the decorative iron fence with masonry piers in the
Brooklyn Boulevard greenstrip adjacent to the Culver's Restaurant.
c. A lighting plan consistent with the requirements of Section 35 -712 of
the Zoning Ordinance.
12. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall
conform to the City of Brooklyn Center standard specifications and details.
13. The applicant shall obtain an NPDES permit from the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency and shall also provide adequate erosion control as
approved by the City's Engineering Department.
14. Trash pick up and truck deliveries on the east side of the multi- tenant
building located adjacent to the residential properties to the east shall be
confined to the hours of 8:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m.
15. No building permit will be issued for construction of any of the proposed
buildings until the plat comprehended under Planning Commission
Application No. 2002 -007 has been given final approval by the City
Council and filed with Hennepin County.
16. The applicant shall enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn
Center to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to the
issuance of building permits. Said development agreement shall be filed
with the title to the property and shall acknowledge the specific
modifications to the C -2 underlying zoning district as well as all other
conditions of approval. The agreement shall further assure compliance
with the development plans submitted with this application.
17. Approval of the PUD comprehends only conceptual approval of the Super
America gas station/convenience store /car wash. Plans shall be submitted
for Planning Commission and City Council review and approval. The
RESOLUTION N0. 2002 -75 Attachment O
layout shall be such that the car wash is not located adjacent to Brooklyn
Boulevard.
18. PUD approval authorizes two freestanding development signs to be
incorporated in the comer landscape nodes at 69th and 70th Avenues and
Brooklyn Boulevard and a freestanding monument type identification sign
for Culver's and SuperA.merica to be located on their respective sides of
the Brooklyn Boulevard entrance. The monument signs shall not exceed
12 ft. in height and 145 sq. ft. in area. No other freestanding
identification signs shall be permitted with the PUD.
19. The applicant shall provide on site traffic control signs as deemed
appropriate by the City Engineer.
June 10, 2002
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Ed Nelson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Myrna Kragness, Kay Lasman, Era Nelson Bob Peppe, and Tim Ricker;
and the following voted against the same: None
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Final Plat Attachment Two
JOHNCO ADDITION
R.T. DOC. No.
– — — — — — — — — — — — L — — — — — — — ------- ------ - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
70th Avenue Harth j=arrnerty Lane Street)
---- -- T-I is-4 f
17
12
I N
N
3
10
B 10 C*
4 0 C* i
k
1 wl� �� 11 ! L
IX
Mae 1W 733ff la 5
L — — — — — — — —
- - E-9th Ave. Harth
591h Ave. N=rlli (Farrierly C. No. 1
-R 30
TV
ASSOC IATES
84" 26 SHHT3
Attachment Three
------- . ..... . .......... ..... . ..... I .. . ............
BROOKLYN
CENTER
BROOKLYN CENTER RETAIL DEVELOPMENT RET"L
C I TY OF
BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA BROOKLYN CENTER
M I X N E S 0 T A
Open By
- - - - - - - - - - SITE SYMBOLS
7 EXIS ING R-4
PROPOSED DESCRIPTION
=
CONTOUR
. 1224 SPOT ELEVATION
BUILDING
UNDERGROUND STRUCTURE
RAIL ARCH NET
ROAD
CONCRETE
rr
BITUMINOUS PAVING
-------------
----------------------
`. .� i ; ' - i '� CONCRETE CURB
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
SLOPE DIRECTION
I --------------------- FENCING
I GUARD RAIL
RETAINING WALL
------------
V TREE-SAVE
ti
--------------------- ON
SOIL BORING
C> Mil. DOORWAY
SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE
- TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL
...... ------ T ------------
LIGHT STANDARD
POWER POLE
It NOTE REFERENCE
PARKING STALL COUNT
LARGE SHEET DETAIL
I COORDINATE POINT
BOLLARD
- em
r
ASSOCI
Nov"
rm
mau CO-1
Attachment Four
70th Avenue North
�..�_ .:......w
ROgK R C CENTER
_—
�, RETAIL
\\ i I — I I CITY O F
BROOKLYN CENTER
BURDINGOR04L RESTAURANT
\ \ I 3960 SF 11 1230 SF ` l M I N N E S 0 T A
\\ ` 1 PAPA BB15 I I * FFE BB�d .. I .
DEVELOPED BY
TP
I r
\ —
� ♦ \\ � � i j \ j ...:;dam:. -= c.. °— ..,.
J t .. ........... - _- ._::_::_.::_ :a:: : I ARCHNET
% - --
` \ .40• �`�_S. � '� ./':': I %ED RETAIL
\ '\ ': �'. ... I •.. I 21300 IF
N ORFfl \ \ y y I — — —
o Oa Lo
!CALL IN PLL7
for
SITE SYMBOLS y •\ Q , \\ -o'p�, 1 - -_ - -- ::::�.:
ESIS P1rM. O IPIIA \ \ � � � -__- _ I
\ I
i--.u� twTOUR \� •\ !� �\ \ `b v� ' � j -- _ ::...: -- 1 c�lcr to u.n.o �"".. �= _
• � 0 RcAVr aO• rAw.[wr saw• .:
( vacllAReRa sru.cruA! Ao..r PAAga AAir, \\` \ `\\ Si \ — I I
RAIIROM '.• .
s11V.1IRas P IW NOTES ♦ . %�\ ♦ �� • '\ I ��� I j Lasnllcr
I. 01.1p140.. 3110.1. O. "Al' PIAA ARE f0 rA¢ v WSa ARO \
cKrrcR[ clAle \ \ \� ♦ \ i . ; a b :..✓ +.:.�. 1 : a u rflAO r ERO�o m in Oo Ta I
�— [W OF "TOM, r.eE v s. IRAESS Rolm er110e.1>< .......
o11KCtlaRiT L P- 11-9 to BE srRRD wM A .- wQ _TE P_RD ,\ \ ,\ ♦ \ \ Y
SrWE. IIARWVf ACCESS A ISLES TO BE M ARM A .'
1µR NATE PM M %r I.' OG a A AT U DECREE `\ \\ \ ``��\ - •••• -t- . -. -. -•.T•. .�:: '.
(AKAAC HAIL
�S 1 AlrA In 1.. vAt; 1 MM Cd.P[R WM AR0 WRTB112 MaPaSm ION ALL PWVArE \ \\ \ \ _ .': . :::::::::..::. '•::.':.'::.':• •.:::::::::::: .�.�..w
.�:" se1L .OA1M .. rAra Erma EoREan[ a1W AND arms \
\ i
1aOAVA• A AR[A s IW1@ P1nro nAn.1m wr ar¢t3+RR1 b+[R 0 -1 a R -I. \ •\ \ a ......
- -. -'•.-
-1-T C 1RO_ IflaE a PAASwe A[d•RO/OIt4 .......
TMWIM• SECIMrT CeXrRn RFSIAURMr: olE SPACE I a [VERY F >< ARO aE 4Ati I01 ..
• LIW1T STWAAe [KR• ITa MO.![S C1. M AVL11A0. RA>elwv f•rT, \ ..:•.• ••- S.. A. ac 'AC
C - -. •""•^••nmm(
,\ '_ -- -- �---° �---- .�.,_-•- ---' ° ""."�"'�:", ". AErOK ASSOCIATES
4 v i POKA POt[ KA.a.OA•: I I— IM see v Wass naKw AREA
LAIa[ SrRr o[IAW � vAm AE1AA, f13.. lo. • n `\
O® COMO MAR ro 1MT .".-1 •.s3. .. c a \ 69th Ave North (Fonne►�y Ca Rd N0. t30) BROOKLYN C ENTER RETAIL
.Hare rota 31 In . rn \ -- . -- -- -- .._ '- -._. DEVELOPMENT
21/L P4M
t -1.I.A
Attachment Five
. . . . . ......... — ---- - . . . . ........ ... ..... .........
. ... ... ...
Oth Avenue North BROOKLYN
7
. . ....... . . . ...... .... Avenue .. ......
CENTER
RETAIL
a C I T T 0 F
NUMDING CWOU RWAtAtANT BROOKLYN CENTER
79605E 1 I r 4nO IF M I N N E S 0 T A
1
OEVELOPED By
p
0,
'77
%
- - - - - , ARCHNET
MrXED RETA&
2i
Norm 0
30 el - — — — — — -
FIVE
4� - - — — — — -
IN
%7..J "I \I. I N 1 4
- - - - -
SrrE SYMBOLS !�TEL
, 7z=_zl IrlDaonarle SlAUCrula L x.A,l o.r.r w.eKrt aI. Ar w,m � \' � 1 �+ �. � _ � — _ � •� , — «
�o jf\
W� RAIL ft,
-1. — . Ica
fPEZ_.A.
% ax
L1.1 ll• D
ASSOCIATES
O 1-1- !TI
LOGE WE' DE T A I L 69tft'\,AvsL North (FamedY Ca Rd Na ♦30)
I lAl BROOKLYN CENTER R AIL
D"ELOPMENT
. ......... . LID
Attachment Six
.......................
?w BROORLYN
%
Averve North
70th ER
. . .... CENT
v RETAIL
WX
.: -,;
C I T OF
BROOKLYN CENTER
RWALYRANT
4230 5F
M I N N E S 0 T A
ME-LOPED BY
WWI
I A If 013D am)
a
P
N 21
w
aLLU - - a - - - -- -
Rom %
so mw" 3 - - - - - - - ARCHNET
Ic
SCALX IN rEur
W. IFTAIL
�: r.r m.aa b'��wa .. aes:a � � `.� � � ➢ +-� i L � .— �F."_`S' --.�
% Ir
4
VIA
24'
\ \ Y - i
Nk
%
%
PROPOSED LEGEND
N ASSOCIATES
69th' North I 1 (Formerly Ca Rd Na
tMLrfY PLAN
. . . . . . ...... .... ..................... .
• d
qw
li•1 .� • I
IY•1 � ■•d!w
L L
s•
L
1 as
A ..� �i' — • man - 0 IMMIN
ARC NET
MONISM—
w; � \. . / , r '� m aw r.•;�� '!�
,n ��° 1 mod" Z e'" : _ : ° e "w' • 1
� !! y
• . - • • < • Iii 1�1 •ri ' Iti .• - �� 11�. -% ' I IN _
mA srr+.�r*r,♦msnr -� ". .c.. .
L^.■s� ... ra- �r- �— s...�sraa��rt,>•cr.^:r:+�nr_ "••;��
C+1 ■>• .... r^r*— v-= isaar�rrn R'ramrn�
f'17A fi7i.•�f L'1 '� iois 0,
Ems
Lt^■[7•t4^l.'fi•^tilf ! li it�T: �f1,1Lil..fift'.� •�� !] ■■
1 per.. ■..■
rsm llf(T<•f'i'� +ev:�arn1 ■mr^� • "LLL '
+rwm ■±V�•1i�■if1■m+t".'� I.L :t\ a l.r Lf i
fP. ■L�tT■7•Rl{*:. .1� [!V'.'.Ti■?T1fR1tTi"!� �` �t1 � ,�� /y rL� L.• +■ L■ I• ■+ � L / .
OA �cm�r+,>•.c- crnrr� \\ °• ', , i, �� RSd� ,.••� ci `•' L ,!'� ��
mr>. �rrr�r*r�n^resrn�
`m = o e
' r`.' LL' i.- rr�,- o-ri....m�.�*c- ca -� ■`:z � �m`�"` -+,c;� � \, `� F.1,1. �i� ,''�. M► �°' �S•:�4 :e;` .'►s ��, "' �_
< .. .. u... •, ..... ft7T�fTf7Li^.:fi5i1'� ,. � � IAiIAi �1 / #� • —
®FL7 em s � � "a� � ' -:•,i •'rw+a L. L■ s■ s■ I:•.i� L��1` �
l�•1 ,•.• IJ WI LV I.1
r!t■7 /,tT7TT?<Ri �f'i:.ni ■:•lifll.^IItT� � T —
s^.m y)pppI N
rar1• ......:. - .... srr^a r..-a rrls■vri i n�l,a
a
'f r
■r.+ra m.�ar::r�r. ■rr� I i M �
LOUCKS
WIN
m■>• srscrt,rarna p
� A
m■
ffm
ra■m .. .. �rr.�ma■:rels:a:r�
Ram- rrritrrlrrr.- o:sr.->_ ���
,._ .Ir.T-a.�nccsrrr� 1I.
Attachment Eight
verr Prz r.RwrosdrrmNC eu. +R elzvAnoNf s+rowN Art rNrRRO elrvArrora Rm eHVArare w>aKfeoenDANrD rAVmwaAm rNerao w «« ww.NCNATau R.NlnceenK.srm r.r r -aa,.m c«mrrdeNS.a.arwrrdo . wwc . r.wnNANa «ur
fs.l�na.�cr N�re uo lcerx lAHAw wml Txerwe rM[re¢mD¢T OKR SONraIAR saasero fNNLl Nnorenow stuAa elzvnrwarrNl. NVEe4 mw MTKL IErG aDrlirm of paum.IUK, NewLr NSrAUmNUmras uvrrl nA[aowNa necmAra.
coNOmorn mArrrc rorsa NAnu AND xPR «wdR NAU.r«Nw «eRTSTNC«.rarNNAwwfro! RAr.nwe. elX. wAraaoorsmerArn NArurArns.m rd rNe nArox ww AN.Arn�vANwLeN NDAw"a wfaDf NA.DCCTl rRDero
KeNY UV[M ANp ANV DalMgrB xIWN AND reMG DRA«DUNlaS pTHPRWrl NOlm, saD xWLl URI rAeal[Lro MEONIaRf ANDRWINAK ALL DnWalf rT�rl,wrzpNMrNlrWdrorRA AND cwnucrorL COrnucrd flwu rrrowu MOwNa WRNA
TACrnm.aNrs. oN xaa mrzn r.wr>rdwouNwe mAOK NLwRAwrle ArRll sa. ArANrwANa aweAAr NauwGwlr NOr MRSM6 lYLMInD BROOA/i111
WrevA6R mroarcN.wap wnr"' rsir"ia" snvAa ronoa rmu MrwnsnKnruw A
A+.Dna+nAn sw.IZS,MSao sxurlsrAeEOroMaauu. srm FDaarortusmroca+rANSaue.r�wzs.wo ro. ^u•""e I°TM°A^°"ANO Dausr,.m mrrA.
u DD A— .DRR�TT�.IAND><ANA.a — C
A.,�,wNDRID e, D�rtD A�mND�DMn � ISNTISR
NwrC ALL wiaul SHAM Ca.sLrwrmM eDNrrKrd 9rNl CVNANne raw MMAumrrN rlaPleN wT
uKYwmfrLL+Alauel[Xppa AND IlaAANDrIi +eyalr Af A. nfrq.�lO[A rt AxNwaIM aARAWAY M M �IrD +N �a MIRSFn SiDLL � !p aYaK �«pfl«ar.NRd ANO CNENDH nA. r.a.IM Wna ONNP C[1nAKi
DrnERwr ti wdKdA+Araws RanRD. rew RD6.wRIIM LMafPCOrarRlarDrL RETAIL
DlCra1D13 AlRllrf RUII HAK ATIewSrf GNa ATM ;AU M�,LTWBD 4Ra0L WARRVRVf� ��MG�EAI �M��
CONrRAtld frr"ll reDRCr NI[.arrre ROADS. Mt6'PIrnR [ONnXld Swll lRaVD[rRa[R [IroRON CPrte0. ARA11naM SrlCR[D RaD. IrerWr. dwraMNlr�fWlruK NOV ALL 6KR0®ITII�roN�fTf Dm xRIKIFD HMPAODD +N"+L
nARS.raa.uwws AND Srrt nrARfm alur+c ruNrmc Kw�
DM esxrr Ar AN Aeuvre cmron"+ro RUU KCN KANwmc NOlown sswarAKx[ ���w.�NOaac cD.a"nwrm nm rerNC A a �sw�ca om
DAwrc( ro+AAN fNN1 K rerAam Ar W DEr RD« eUl Sna[r AND eP1rNAID r.m 1Nxl e[DN eeMrom+e Au NO rAnul K
ro MOw,.eK _ rRpvmR rrwdAncvK +rNCrw ura wreANONrm uNn MOtp1ptrwrs Arnie rNmRO woc ALLANNtw AND roowuL N.wrNC RDSroKCWKrT>m rB.00lxmz wsrr>Arouw«ca PwLUwRAn
Aral r.+®eNa ort. N.wr xsaaxe. oeca.ANrn fH.aoao HNmw000 NUEDHmmrNOwem una ParwsAIKXH AND VTR N.w -wRNn IROrICdI1InNP
UNaIIG UUNDAND AKIN WPVRRt3 ANUAWO[M INaraD wONDaCMllrte. MQINNmrO P6r.IRCnGrdSrN¢rRQODa (Mfl CPKr6rcrUN MrNNrnrr ANO nrd rp MDI1RK(VrwP.
N eN wDNCrortDwnanaa mn van c..«DEV.uu DNSw aua ANO C IT Y OF
Nsraurrw lcaa w. �aM Nr�oacw�cn 'D'" iwam NOrmasew+eQ. m+cwnrrz urma �..rw nvrowrnr.rc
N +ass... Au arorosm nwNrf ssw l+ourm Aw nuao ASSawN s wwNCa urazss Norm DM.wa MAr..«RUn oAnsrds..slc
uuso rwsrrK.ouro Au rAarmc ma rorDywroemneDAND.Raaoro nAN.uN«e,•Ae A.crArrcrNnm AravK Ul nAmrc Pe.N.r TMrASrvw PDrTMrKTN AND Sno-soo rucneNre rRON
Nor cvirr..wo .a�oisnrtaaANV OmmerNOro .arPrt ouow000 ANOOAr +AaDdauanNC fwANOrn w mdroArn AUO Ul orrsNC worsen mruero+ssucKwearrrd r,wmw AN eciurw Awed ro ur,<rs
BROOKLYN CENTER
meGAiON UTarr rTAN AND YnlK.fr4H Y A rA[r P M
RDA.Lx NOrUNIIMrebLL SUNTONU'B wai RACarRD1Mm xa[Rwdt wNM eNpNe Trt4 Trull l..R.O.ronM TALL fODarCa«MrNIY Kt[nAK[rpaArFAAf rF.
ous luKS.K«TArvN. Mre,GUrrTR AND ODR1r w+ora e.anNe reoAwaafa:NauNr Rausrwsrras A.E
A-- I, IAVOSUrtA+cNrmrred ro doP ANOd nmusAmNa NoK. rear. r:u snoNCrsw AUarsr rf.sFnwlR rr. M I N N E S 0 T A
Eie wi nNn rASTO UrON rn«wUgN wrnaoro Dasrrz w.arraa RrowN ONM DUwNCa N «, DRr r.ACroe nnoXroMSSrRM+saNaARO ANOO. swuLlM Unox.R COrmAC.dsrasawKmroNnrK DouuNrKmrrcNMrAll sraw rrn acu.m.m
UNOSC RAKMRR IYDnrE4. CONrtKr(R19ult.'DIRYAM AWalErgnCnp ANp NKD UM6s NJn0mRmAD+[D PR)rAnPl nAIALL OD[DaR«D. won wnD ANA+AK �.ArEU NOl'DNeDr r. rlwwaG alrfaa TrOEwraaNa KCO.MTfD.
WAxAr[rA�« (nwfMrarPr AND rgraY ��,aRwraW ArOIAU+PUNa DdSrwL`<eroWrl r`PS INfB A.Uf dKCM1V MpIMD UO AM�ADR15rMENrulllTl NAd[DNNTDNGRM WIDX.V!
No NL M. roM Art[MWa MwrOYNlA6Crmlfr ream A «D DNSMMrS�N tDUiDNarKffrirOnN ? uAR NAY. «wrWrvn
M.uscewrer.r AND CeADa «Mreo.Dno w.N>a. rrAU . —A——DEVELOPED By
m ' °v '� uNDSCVE ARNDTCFNU6TRNarRO wAnaunwNmurroN ArrRPRArtroMN1ORCT rNL aeramn n .wrNCrRxf MrRer rear uNn rannrlR .
ANOd RwowArs Aa AnRet rornoAOnmraMrtWamro LAr .1R roruurroN s «mNOrnora A.nronAra wraw aro..rNnw.a.+Nrs r +. n.wrw amaerwe wra eNP ncn.wrn.n A...
Cwrow ro IDULrIID r«OdwrAC O}maalra AND rourralg RANT MIfT K.frrfOKD NwlaS n M LfNDIEM -.._.
iK[KMa /AI ANp aADrNG ANr[IUNa N,LLrfMRM NNrR CO «ONAn MIwf6PCW5rerKTdrANO rI.WIND wmr aaD e«t uU�OMIxrM.t01[tTI�Ir Nt4D� aM wrI CDNAnCrda[DNmrrtpdn4rW wn
IN
A...oKD r+wfasc "rt A.oancr rarNUrvN wDNOaRRCONrucrmwavrcw +mL wmr fd ra MrffNUrRn NSaRnaerQ.cn N�� _
r.onumNCwu rt«nAUro LNrR CaxtndADNCAw :srN�c.nwaauru,u a»sea i�oz ry ertre� mARw.RM,suRVNUder�iM.sMeE KAUSr rrNC ReK EmiNC aueia o.ws�av N w'�wa�eoK Oimav . »." ••��r"' '" °""•"
warc Nora eowr+szcrrorr HAS ReN m..rImDNMewRa+n ARw ra mAND eozRR R.ue wmfANAnorroN.a Arnfrwnw DKKaNCOroMArr«rv.«M w.Dx -Ne AAPrrler NM.D«mrasAN AVNAUKrQ rrlPrra.e raa
d rarale MlalOwNL9MDNMr!llRlat r!L rorROCTAroNOn ANODE NDAIUrpI RfDUlOKAIRRDwKDUr ¢Y ArmwaNd+e d4AK N«
erADNelrwff ANp1NDSP wbeK xrPVrr AIR DNLr Mr.D..wn sm AU ARUS OenwlD aRroPAdre rolmN+o Kroeoarura+AArrm P[TMNAAI rf ANB ...
ANO rssY rtAdAno NnnDnuNOSCArRArnRreeT .warn Au nAMSrolNnulmwR N.Narc «TAU epNrr..erd RSxa RSR..rAwRrrTD.l reQUarra MOlwal µr l. NOa.uwr,DZ.uPKenr Ml wm.a p..�T f'. �
O�f� CONTUCTW aRUAaf ��otMfAK varNG PblDrawBfa ALL MNDNC Mnf a.CG+G OroIMO<PaR rNR PALL WUY.M NMxn lauWOAKI I CS. 'i
cua wmr «rows Ar.AwAANOO.vw s«u wcvKA.«wa.r « w41C mNiArnwca:arvnAe A r I 1 �ir�+ �
Nrs TUT Oe AM1 r.Vr55ANDSr7 lOrSOI.N dwNAQ Ar.WD Ar«1MDM RIIDINf )r2 Ah�'•S•• qP!
Tor fOA AND
i rC ' rK.w r
GENERAL NOTES:
7 5
FII S
A GU ro 6REi
1/r EXPANSION 10" MATERIAL ADA fLE1INFS A+P : (
CUT BACK MATERIAL I/r [aNAION ow W scvAM L r y
_ _ _ - -- •I BELOW FINISH "FACE gT TPlQ I.'i
EVAN51ON & CONSTRUCTION RR M WA p CONIjtM CM #M PAVM f
I , SR PL. Fm UXAM)N RCHNET
.• » aD.aDrNA .NR.. t
EIJURGFMEM'A' VARRS
+RRa.Sama �e
]T• TOOTED CONTROL IdM r Rf111 � �e
SEE PLAN FOR LAYOUT p rm". sN srTa '-nR�
P THICK CONCRETE WALK 8617 CDNCROFLrzRI lDQ YAM.911 N
UP. JOINT 21Y O.C. MAX. OR AS 6 D1D11 Y I I -1 - - 7�L,•�
SHOWN ON PUN AND AT ALL
CONSTRl1CT" JOINTS. RAMPS.
lS OTHER VERTICAL _ , T nAMING X7R 9E91M. � - �'
_•'� • WAL AND
TRW 1AYDIM >`L - . -� V_ »- S.. -.�•
OBSTRUCTKM I LOOIENROMOF ��• .ti...,.
C d N 3 6• COWACTED AGGRFDATE BASE - d II =II r�III�..,tl I II NAM AUTERIN rRgR �'�� •=+ -- `
U?MMURRED OR COMPACTED -- - X111 =11 - roMNmIG
WIGRADE
NOTE: COLOR TO BE INTEGRAL SCOFIELD C -s2 !QUARRY REDI. • r "
APPLY MEDIUM BROOM FINISH PERPENDIC TO TRAFFIC - 5 PERENNIAL PUNTING
1 COLORED CONCRETE PAVING PROFILE 2 CURB RAMP DETAIL LI -2 :w..w... - --
Ll-
amRATNE Post CM
.-- M AQLE N[ MXY PBIEW -COLOR TO BE • r N+nuia� ^••- -
CITMLMENTARY70CUKVROAInnnNC - 1 _ Q A � w � r ►.�� "�--
w Tmw ONSRLCMQS ?D.m.
- F w w�.rmn °P rNC O° `a m..rm
.l.NT Au navlc ANO wnNC ,
_ti.. .DUSrc
RAMNGDNYTONL rUa 4(VRI
� ,,. rr+�..rrorw.rANrLrA+
M mry l M TOS ROOD «ALL
EONIFY IM CM HANTS `�•
r+a waArrora+rerAraN EER NAN _F ro
qRW ANDSRR5
I 0f
fz+a nAm.c.Dra rl wa r 6Rl Il *WTo nAMUc
a
P U ro f A nA Mf THAT
roramNTRRR TIOnusH
f.Ir wHFRorm CAAIX. .
i Y Y a - OErP ..fiT- '!I- .L�.( I - r , ' t.10= L1OrA°'w' ocMFe
wA f L �. II '' . � r ,.: ... -. F' n
nyArRIIrrG `:� _ PUMINO NOTES
lALDNG WALL RT ANO DETAn9
PVC PRIVACY FENCE 0 EAST PROPERTY LINE DECIDUOU TREE PLANTING DETAIL 6 SHRUB PUNTING DETAIL
Li - u6 w•rr -- L12 wrr.rr Ll
eeouA
DETAILS: PLANTING DETAILS:
Attachment Nine
70TH AVENUE
r ilwort A raI wnNR uNn B=looi/T 7/f�T
ua lTt 11L�1�
�s wA wl
g
C ENTER
R �
c /■ I r t TAIL
Bp0 0,� y 00 4AMMAL y a — CITT OF
B� BROOKLYN CENTER
M I N N E S O T A
L
�O WuR w e ■
R40' -10" DEVELOPED By A
R47' -10" DIa■mo riomerAn 1
R53' -10"
24' R29
6" ASPHALT TRAIL R35'-O' t
R40'4' R RAAIr '
. ....A '3G.kw.,..;
P wABVIx WAL FP4a N"n1 R03 NM Il 1�r •�..
0 ]' 10' 70' C Q y
n n I 69TH AVENUE �� 1 ARCI�INET
I Yi Iii
f*. to' -o' Nam A
CORNER ENLARGEMENT
rmAa■Nais>a� 9 �� w T.C�
ORW■INNRI[NAIVICI!! . t[ m � ^ ��" .�:`a -=
tr DAIN MULO.M170PSOl QANpoR��6i mlQ lrAA 1 _ I . Z .�. • .. - .� : �.
I-N OL ]NI.
P 1 ? ■AORIS RAINOR -
117 W-xv "W RAM El
R1.6•AlNROOA4LRXO.0 ,� tosyAR
� r�� � ' a- .- �rmNaPRwnnc►+c ._..,.- F:...�,� o ]' to w 4� � .,.
°i � •�' v.0w OAR 5 M ,w�ieY n in,¢Ia odma
=Dpuom RRm° �3k nY"d.t!® t• •
� +f < .�f= CORNER ENLARGEMENT ��— r• -•-• -•
11 -3 `"'°""'°•
3 6' CONCRETE CURB E. C9 ( R• ^ 1
LI -3 , �"te"•" ,p ° I: I CW ll Tx WALL
oMa o[N D"F UM r,uuul to '•'� �"_
_I OAA ROARRI ■RU roRANroR
LoutRDIr IlIIQrm/R
RN R PAW 19'a SYSIDA __ I I I ?WCAR COW" fN -MM TO MAROMW A'
IO.rN HR
R RLIFRDAI OIAr.
IA w M A w 1 io ENLARGEMENTW ' . -- — -
colnATS. 5 6' BENCH •VICTOR STANLEY MODEL APRSS i�� - — — — — -- --• ,� OCROCKRISS RODE W WA" V"TBII»
t 90tW L1.3 r r•1•• WM AR ANCO AMM NRO I WITHOUT ADQnUK4 KM 11R
WlMlp dRNtRM
WI S TAao RTA NR.f. - !
cuaR ro Wuto 1 p c OA1RPOR
:,;,. ,•
N IN 0 wHF M* ■ " rR " OR ro TOC OWU :.�� reHaeorwmlDN■RnrooAARealNrtr
caaRR oN. 4, .�...
f PA■"IIO SIRL ONUNLMx RA■Rq.
tt rrrrtaoORAanWOm+n . rRrAm
u 0[ANACC■rcAn eAOmu - —
_. t T� sort AWATr WAU RAR �^II •. ••. �•.. -� y +[.. f0D' NAOI .sue •
W { .-f r� - _ 1� Yi� <' WICOHC[tR R00f WE
—MAR ""owAp ASSOCIATES
PDRRI WAEAClrO AOpRWR 11. � � I.IM.I!■NA ■1R]
IR R pIM06t11■■ro 1•' rORl COroORR roOfR1G
R \ _ CONCRR ropes
WRNQOIQ FARRXR 1 [_�I COAPACiFOp UIR11LlUR■RD AIRaADE • CORNER ENLARGEMENTS
._% WIN IOA7MHBI roR06I/S■.G AND DETAILS
ENLARGEMENT'!' 9M ORSA ANORM 11M%At
4 VERSA -LOK RETAINING WALL 6 Y METAL RAILING AND BLOCK PIERS MOH HOODWAL W UXAIOM.
Ll -3�* �• Ltd *-■A U ....
CORNER ENLARGEMENTS AND DETAIL
a -
�� illllllllllllillllllll�i���,..
_______:- :_- __:_:..... _ _ :___:_ _
____
_-______-_-__-________--__-_--_______-
----------------- --
' L ._ ' _ _ __ ___ ____ _ ____ _
________ -------------------------
gg'.
_____ _-- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ------- ------ -----__�.
__ ________ _I _ -_ .__._______ -_____
IIIII.I!;�'i�1111 ► Iill�i�;!!IIIIII
;; __ :::::::: ■::: _ _::: ::::::: : ::::
__.
-------
.. ,�I�I illl�llllii�� IIII .��ilill ...11lllllll�lllllli��1
MVM
M
I ,
(: I
jl, ,(il((ill jlll,llllllll_IIIIIII „1111 IIII (Ij...........(I(jll,ll= lljlll II I(�j -11 II(illl(I(,= (jllllllj((j = IIIIIIIIillll lllli IIIII IIII II i II I III II i II IIII I III IIII IIII I III IIII:
mom =i��■� _■■�■■ _■■�■■_■■ r■■■■�■■ =■■�■■ ■■�■■ _■■�■■ _■�����■
0 MEN NO
iiii /i i w . l \iii /iiiiiiciii /iiiiii)
iiii iiwii iiiiwi i
iii
wi
i ii iiii iiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiii R
■i i iwiiiwiii iiiiiii /i ii iiiiiiiiiii
i wwwii- iiiiiiii wiiiwiiiiiiiif5i ill
•iiwii. iiiiiii wii iiiM"Now iii/ /iii Sul
i iiiiiiiiiO�i� iii iiiiii /iiiii9\ =Jifiii /i■
■ iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii - --
WINE iii ii iiwiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii■
• IIII / iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii /J iiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiii iiiiii /iiiiiiiiiiiiw 7iiiiiiw /ii■ �I�II ■ ■ ■I'.�' i
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiw/`i
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii / = .
-i iiiiii
iiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiwiiiiiiiiiii■
wii iiii iiiiiiiiiwiiwiwiiwiiwiiiiiiiiil ..,..,,,,.,'..'.', ■. �. .d S.
■ iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ii i iw i iii i ww i t♦ iw / i wii
r
iiiiiiii/ liwiiiiii..i�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil -
■ iiiiiii 1 r�iiiiii�i . %flriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiii w►w /iiiiii iiiiiil .
iiiiiiiii iiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
�
ii i i
i i �=
■iii ii i
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii wwi i\ wiiiiiiii
■ i7r✓iiiiiir•J irf:7 wiiii■ I
iiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
i i iiiii ii iiiiiiiiiii iiiiii /iiiiiiiiiii■ _
■i iiiiwiiii wiiwiwiiii iiiiiiiwi��_ =z
ii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil-- /- i- i - - - - -- iiil
■ iiiiiiiiiiii/ iii /iiiiiiiiiiiiwiw. iiiiii iiiiii il.w if:
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii il- iiiiiiiiiii- iiii
.. .. _.._. -... _.. __.- __.... _ _______________________________ ____------------- _----- _----
_
.._- . .. .. ... ...... --------- - --- --- -- ----------------------------- -
.. .. . .. -- --------
.. ......... . . . . .. ..... .............. ....... .... ...... .... . ...... .. .. :: . ... .- _. -. _ __.- . -.... _...__ - - -_- __ _ _ __ _ -----------
____- __ __ __
� ... .... . . .. .. ....... . .. . .. .. - - -- .
North Building
Exterior Elevations Attachment Twelve
n�� Nna w
ura
�..� SIGNAGE SIGNAGE SIGNAGE SIGNAGE
MOR I'N M
NOES A!A! 01{11V
�� mM INA
On11tl1lMlA
� tAi
IV�01 �� �I�IMAM
I
K I101l1tlr I �'
•eresu
sur na
rwoeu
�1 NlOP11 Y1M710N
w•Fr
- , > ��.� — — 11 � III I� �... ..SCY3L;.� i� • • �
`�. 1 I 1 1 �• � 1 �I . i 1 1 � 1 1 1! 1 / 11 / 1 1 t !''� ;
��•\ 'I�R 1r� � 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 �. .�11��� lu�y� O'
� � � � � �'K__ i' +« '.te�r • '1 IN
1 1
As Me
wG
t
o n a n
• .`� 1 .Pomona
�• � •�w+.0000a�.rse
I.
J�ss;
M E
WE
:1
MIII
LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE
Symbol Label Qty Catalog Number Description Lamp Fife Lumens LLF
A 3 KAD 400M R4 DIECAST TYPE IV, 400 WATT METAL g1110101.ies 36000 0.72 Attachment Thirteen
SHORT, CUTOFF HALIDE - HORIZONTAL
LUMINAIRE BURN
El DIECAST TYPE IV, 400 WATT METAL
AZ 10 KAD 400M R4 SHORT, CUTOFF HALIDE - HORIZONTAL 91110101.ies 36000 0.72
LUMINAIRE BURN
DIE -CAST CUTOFF 400 WATT METAL
B 7 KAD 400M R3 LUMINAIRE HALIDE 92040902.ies 36000 0.72
°
a KAD 250M R4 - DIECAST TYPE IV, 250 WATT METAL
C 4 WALL MT SHORT, CUTOFF HALIDE - HORIZONTAL 91102805.ies 20500 0.72
LUMINAIRE BURN
STATISTICS
CU
a
Description Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min
L •`
Calc Zone #1 2.2 fc 7.9 fc 0.2 fc 39.5:1 11.2:1 C a)
� W
U a`)
LUMINAIRE LOCATIONS
0
0
Location `'
m
No. Label X Y Z MH Orientation
1 A2 390.5 85.8 30.0 30.0 90.0
10 B 162.8 524.5 30.0 30.0 180.0
Designer
12 C 529.5 355.0 20.0 20.0 90.0 KJ
24 A 195.2 422.8 30.0 30.0 270.0 Date
Davis &Associates, Inc.
Jul 23 2002
6446 Flying Cloud Drive Scale
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 as noted
Phone: 952.941.0410
FAX: 952.941.4568 Revision - Date
L ighting Plan www.davisassociatesinc.com
Davis & Associates, Inc. does not assume responsibility for the 3 of 3
interpretation of this calculation, or compliance to local or state
lighting codes and ordinances.
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -04
RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMENDED DISPOSITION OF
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2010 -007 SUBMITTED BY
VANGUARD CONSTRUCTION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 2,
BLOCK 1, JOHNCO ADDITION.
WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 2002 -75 adopted on June 10 2002,
approved a rezoning from C -2 (Commerce) and R -1 (One Family Residence) to PUD /C -2 of a 5.6
acre site located at the northeast quadrant of 69th Avenue North and Brooklyn Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, that Planned Unit Development (PUD) proposal also included
development plan approval for a 34,228 sq. ft., four building mixed use commercial/retail
development including conceptual approval of a Super America gas station/convenience store /car
wash on the above mentioned site. Said development approval required additional plans be
submitted for Planning Commission and City Council review and approval of the Super America
development; and
WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 2002 -111, adopted on August 26, 2002,
accepted the Planning Commission's recommendation on a PUD amendment to allow construction
of a revised layout providing for a 3,958 sq. ft. Super America convenience store /gas station/car
wash on Lot 1, Block 1, Johnco Addition; and
WHEREAS, Vanguard Construction has made application for site and building
plan approval for the development of Lot 2, Block 1, Johnco Addition providing for a five bay
multi— tenant commercial building having a floor area of 6,757; and
WHEREAS, the proposed development increases the total commercial sq. ft. of this
PUD by 7.4 percent which requires the processing of a major plan amendment to the approved
PUD; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on April
29, 2010, when a staff report and public testimony regarding the Planned Unit Development
amendment were received; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Planned Unit Development
amendment request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating rezonings
contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the Planned Unit
Development ordinance contained in Section 35 -355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission
of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2010 -007
submitted by Vanguard Construction for the development of Lot 2, Block 1, Johnco Addition, be
approved in light of the following considerations:
1. The Planned Unit Development amendment, providing for the re- orientation and
enlargement of the building from 4,230 sq. ft. to 6,757 sq. ft. is generally consistent
with the multi- tenant commercial /retail planned use for this lot, is compatible with
the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the
City's Zoning Ordinance.
2. The Planned Unit Development amendment will allow for the utilization of the land
in question in a manner, which is compatible with, complimentary to and of
comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on
surrounding land.
3. The utilization of the property as proposed under the Planned Unit Development
amendment is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with
city ordinance standards except for allowing a less than 10 ft. green/parking strip
from interior property lines. This modification from the C -2 standards is justified
on the basis of the development being an appropriate redevelopment of this area
and that it is off set or mitigated by factors contained in the approved site plans and
City Council Resolution No. 2002 -75.
4. The Planned Unit Development amendment is considered compatible with the
recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the City.
5. The amendment is complimentary to the existing commercial buildings, will cause
the completion of this redevelopment project, and result in a finished project that is
corner stone within the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor and an asset to the
community at large.
6. In light of the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating
rezonings as contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met
and that the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community.
Be it further resolved by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of
Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2010 -007 be approved
subject to the following conditions and considerations:
1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building
Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits.
2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review
and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits.
3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an
amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to
the issuance of permits to assure completion of all site improvements.
4. B -612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving
areas.
5. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical
equipment shall be appropriately screened from view.
6. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system
to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring
device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances.
7. Underground irrigation shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate
site maintenance.
8. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of
the City Ordinances.
9. An as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines
shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to release of the performance
guarantee.
10. The plans shall be modified as recommended by the City Engineer to
relocate the northern driveway and include vehicular turning movements to
assure the proper functioning of the drive thru lane.
11. The applicant shall enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn
Center to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to the
issuance of permits and further assure compliance with the development
plans submitted with this application.
Date Chai r
ATTEST
Secretary
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
City of Brooklyn Center
Section 35 -208 REZONING EVALUATION POLICY AND REVIEW GUIDELINES.
1. Purpose
The City Council fmds that effective maintenance of the comprehensive planning and land use
classifications is enhanced through uniform and equitable evaluation of periodic proposed changes
to this Zoning Ordinance; and for this purpose, by the adoption of Resolution No. 77 -167, the City
Council has established a rezoning evaluation policy and review guidelines.
2. Policy
It is the policy of the City that: A) Zoning classifications must be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan, and, B) Rezoning proposals will not constitute "spot zoning ", defined as a
zoning decision, which discriminates in favor of a particular landowner and does not relate to the
Comprehensive Plan or to accepted planning principles.
3. Procedure
Each rezoning proposal will be considered on its merits, measured against the above policy and
against these guidelines, which may be weighed collectively or individually as deemed by the City.
4. Guidelines
A. Is there a clear and public need or benefit?
B. Is the proposed zoning consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use
classifications?
C. Can all permitted uses in the proposed zoning district be contemplated for development of the
subject property?
D. Have there been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area since the
subject property was zoned?
E. In the case of City - initiated rezoning proposals, is there a broad public purpose evident?
F. Will the subject property bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed
zoning districts?
G. Is the subject property generally unsuited for uses permitted*in the present zoning district, with
respect to size, configuration, topography or location?
H. Will the rezoning result in the expansion of a zoning district, warranted by: 1) Comprehensive
planning; 2) The lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district; or, 3) The best
interests of the community?
1. Does the proposal demonstrate merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of an
individual parcel?
Section 35 -208
Revised 3 -01
i
c. Accessory uses incidental to the foregoing principal uses when located on the same
property with the use to which it is accessory but not including any business or
industrial uses. Such accessory uses to include but not be restricted to the following:
1. Off -street parking.
2. Public recreational buildings and parks, playgrounds and athletic fields.
3. Signs as permitted in the Brooklyn Center Sign Ordinance.
Section 35 -355. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.
Subdivision 1. Purpose.
The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) district is to promote flexibility in land
development and redevelopment, preserve aesthetically significant and environmentally sensitive site
features, conserve energy and ensure a high quality of design.
Subdivision 2. Classification of PUD Districts; Permitted Uses; Applicable Regulations.
a. Upon rezoning for a PUD, the district shall be designated by the letters "PUD" followed by
the alphanumeric designation of the underlying zoning district which may be either the prior
zoning classification or a new classification. In cases of mixed use PUDs, the City Council
shall, whenever reasonably practicable, specify underlying zoning classifications for the
various parts of the PUD. When it is not reasonably practicable to so specify underlying
zoning classifications, the Council may rezone the district, or any part thereof, to "PUD-
MIXED."
b. Regulations governing uses and structures in PUDs shall be the same as those governing the
underlying zoning district subject to the following:
1. Regulations may be modified expressly by conditions imposed by the Council at the
time of rezoning to PUD.
2. Regulations are modified by implication only to the extent necessary to comply with
the development plan of the PUD.
3. In the case of districts rezoned to PUD- MIXED, the Council shall specify regulations
applicable to uses and structures in various parts of the district.
35 -45
c. For purposes of determining applicable regulations for uses or structures on land adjacent
to or in the vicinity of the PUD district which depend on the zoning of the PUD district, the
underlying zoning classification of PUD districts shall be deemed to be the zoning
classification of the district. In the case of a district zoned PUD - MIXED, the underlying
zoning classification shall be deemed to be the classification which allows as a permitted use
any use which is permitted in the PUD district and which results in the most restrictive
regulation of adjacent or nearby properties.
Subdivision 3. Development Standards.
a. A PUD shall have a minimum area of one acre, excluding land included within the floodway
or flood fringe overlay districts and excluding existing rights -of -way, unless the City finds
that at least one of the following conditions exists:
1. There are unusual physical features of the property or of the surrounding neighborhood
such that development as a PUD will conserve a physical or terrain feature of
importance to the neighborhood or community;
2. The property is directly adjacent to or across a public right -of -way from property which
previously was developed as a PUD and the new PUD will be perceived as and function
as an extension of that previously approved development; or
3. The property is located in a transitional area between different land uses and the
development will be used as a buffer between the uses.
b. Within a PUD, overall density for residential developments shall be consistent with Section
35-400 of this ordinance. Individual buildings or lots within a PUD may exceed these
standards, provided that density for the entire PUD does not exceed the permitted standards.
C. Setbacks, buffers and greenstrips within a PUD shall be consistent with Section 35-400 to
35-414 and Section 35 -700 of this ordinance unless the developer can demonstrate to the
City's satisfaction that a lesser standard should be permitted with the addition of a screening
treatment or other mitigative measures.
d. Parking provided for uses within a PUD shall be consistent with the parking requirements
contained in Section 35 -704 of this ordinance unless the developer can demonstrate to the
City's satisfaction that a lesser standard should be permitted on the grounds of the
complementarity of peak parking demands by the uses within the PUD. The City may
require execution of a restrictive covenant limiting future use of the property to those uses
which will continue this parking complementarity, or which are otherwise approved by the
City.
35 -46
Subdivision 4. General Standards.
a. The City may allow more than one principal building to be constructed on each platted lot
within a PUD.
b. A PUD which involves only one land use or a single housing type may be permitted
provided that it is otherwise consistent with the purposes and objectives of this section.
c. A PUD may only contain uses consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
d. All property to be included within a PUD shall be under unified ownership or control or
subject to such legal restrictions or covenants as may be necessary to ensure compliance with
the approved development plan and site plan.
e. The uniqueness of each PUD requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities,
public facilities and the approval of land subdivision may be subject to modifications from
the City Ordinances generally governing them. The City Council may, therefore, approve
streets, utilities, public facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with
usual specifications or ordinance requirements where it is found that such are not required
in the interests of the residents or of the City.
Subdivision 5. Application and Review.
a. Implementation of a PUD shall be controlled by the development plan. The development
plan may be approved or disapproved by the City Council after evaluation by the Planning
Commission. Submission of the development plan shall be made to the Director of Planning
and Inspection on such forms and accompanied by such information and documentation as
the City may deem necessary or convenient, but shall include at a minimum the following:
1. Street and utility locations and sizes;
2. A drainage plan, including location and size of pipes and water storage areas;
3. A grading plan;
4. A landscape plan;
5. A lighting plan;
6. A plan for timing and phasing of the development;
7. Covenants or other restrictions proposed for the regulation of the development;
35 -47
S. A site plan showing the location of all structures and parking areas;
9. Building renderings or elevation drawings of all sides of all buildings to be constructed
in at least the first phase of development; and
10. Proposed underlying zoning classification or classifications.
Such information may be in a preliminary form, but shall be sufficiently complete and accurate
to allow an evaluation of the development by the City.
b. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the development plan. Notice of
such public hearing shall be published in the official newspaper and actual notice shall be
mailed to the applicant and adjacent property owners as required by Section 3 5-2 10 of this
ordinance. The Planning Commission shall review the development plan and make such
recommendations as it deems appropriate regarding the plan within the time limits
established by Section 35 -210 of this ordinance.
c. Following receipt of the recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City Council
shall hold such hearing as it deems appropriate regarding the matter. The City Council shall
act upon the development plan within the time limits established by Section 35 -210 of this
ordinance. Approval of the development plan shall constitute rezoning of the property to
PUD and conceptual approval of the elements of the plan. In addition to the guidelines
provided in Section 35 -208 of this ordinance, the City Council shall base its actions on the
rezoning upon the following criteria:
1. Compatibility of the plan with the standards, purposes and intent of this section;
2. Consistency of the plan with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan;
3. The impact of the plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located; and
4. The adequacy of internal site organization, uses, densities, circulation, parking facilities,
public facilities, recreational areas, open spaces, and buffering and landscaping.
The City Council may attach such conditions to its,, approval as it may determine to be necessary
to better accomplish the purposes of the PUD district.
d. Prior to construction on any site zoned PUD, the developer shall seek plan approval pursuant
to Section 3 5-23 0 of this ordinance. In addition to the information specifically required by
Section 35 -230, the developer shall submit such information as may be deemed necessary
or convenient by the City to review the consistency of the proposed development with the
approved development plan.
35 -48
The plan submitted for approval pursuant to Section 35 -230 shall be in substantial
compliance with the approved development plan. Substantial compliance shall mean that
buildings, parking areas and roads are in essentially the same location as previously
approved; the number of dwelling units, if any, has not increased or decreased by more than
5 percent; the floor area of nonresidential areas has not been increased or decreased by more
than 5 percent; no building has been increased in the number of floors; open space has not
been decreased or altered from its original design or use, and lot coverage of any individual
building has not been increased or decreased by more than 10 percent.
e. Prior to construction on any site zoned PUD, the developer shall execute a development
agreement in a form satisfactory,to the City.
f. Applicants may combine development plan approval with the plan approval required by
Section 35 -230 by submitting all information required for both simultaneously.
g. After approval of the development plan and the plan approval required by Section 35 -230,
nothing shall be constructed on the site and no building permits shall be issued except in
conformity with the approved plans.
h. If within 12 months following approval by the City Council of the development plan, no
building permits have been obtained or, if within 12 months after the issuance of building
permits no construction has commenced on the area approved for the PUD district, the City
Council may initiate rezoning of the property.
i. Any major amendment to the development plan may be approved by the City Council
following the same notice and hearing procedures specified in this section. An amendment
shall be considered major if it involves any change greater than that permitted by subdivision
5d of this section. Changes which are determined by the City Council to be minor may be
made if approved by the Planning Commission after such notice and hearing as may be
deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission.
35 -49
To: Members of the Planning Commission
From: Gary Eitel, Planning Commission Secretary
Date: April 28, 2010
Subject: Discussion Items for April 28, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting
Review of Section 35 -800 Administrative Use Permits — Outdoor Sales Markets for Minnesota
Grown Produce, Fruits, Plants, Flowers and Herbs. (See attached memo.)
April 26, 2010 City Council Update /Actions on Planning Commission Items
• The City Council accepted the Planning Commission recommendations on the Northwest
Family Service Center Preliminary Plat and Site and Building Plans. Attached for your
reference is an additional memo on the traffic analysis. I have also included a series of
emails to illustrate that attention to the concerns within the neighborhood are recognized
and being addressed.
Update on Comprehensive Planning Issues
• Bass lake Road and 57` Avenue Corridor Study
Attached is a draft RFP for a cooperative study by the City and Three River Parks District
to study options for a regional connection between the Shingle Creek, Twin lakes and
Mississippi Regional trails.
• Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study
Attached is a letter from Hennepin County Transportation Department acknowledging
that the portion of Brooklyn Boulevard, identified as a city planning issue, is listed as a
potential project (provisional) that could be implemented in the event additional funding
becomes available.
• 53` Avenue Corridor (West of the Bellevue Trail and Streetscape Improvements)
Attached is a proposal by Louck's Associates to assist the City in a scoping document for
trail and streetscape improvements for the portion of 53` Avenue leading up to Humboldt
Avenue.
This exercise and resulting study /concepts could be applied to the Humboldt Corridor,
previously referred to the Planning Commission by the City Council.
MEMORANDUM
T0: Planning Commission Members
From: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development
DATE: April 22, 2010
SUBJECT: Review of Section 35 -800 Administrative Use Permits - outdoor sales
markets for Minnesota grown produce, fruits, plants, flowers, herbs.
Background Information:
Section 35 -800 of the zoning ordinance provides for the issuance of administrative permits
for temporary land uses that do not substantially impair the parking capacity of the
principal use and that do not impair safe and efficient pedestrian or vehicular traffic on or
off the premises.
The review of the permit application includes factors such as the time of the year, parking
layout, nature of the use, and other pertinent factors relative to the request and area.
The code provides for two categories of applicants:
1. Church functions, civic functions, charities, carnivals and similar functions.
2. Permitted and Special Uses within non - residential zoning districts.
Within the non - residential districts a permit not exceeding 30 consecutive weeks in any
calendar year is allowed for outdoor retail sale, display, and storage of nursery and garden
merchandise, including lawn furniture and equipment.
A review of past administrative permits indicates that these permits were issued for
seasonal plant sales that were held in the parking lots at Malborg's Nursery- Greenhouse,
Cub Foods, and Brookdale Center.
In 2009, Ms. Paome Yang introduced the concept of a Farmer's Market to be held within the
parking lot of Brookdale Center. The Planning Commission discussed the concept at their
June 11, 2009 meeting. The attached minutes of this meeting reflect discussions on
defining what a farmers market entailed and what provisions should be considered in
amending the City's ordinances to allow such a use.
Ms. Yang was permitted to operate the 2009 Farmer's Market through the use of
administrative permits that were issued to businesses within the mall under the provisions
of 2 (b) of the code, miscellaneous outdoor retail sales or display or promotional events for
periods not to exceed 10 consecutive days. Two 10 day permits were allowed per premise
per calendar year.
Note: The practice for multi- tenant locations has been that each business is allowed two
10 day permits.
Attached for your reference is a copy of the Planning Commission Minutes, the staff memo
prepared for that discussion item, and a copy of Section 35 -800 Administrative Permits.
2010 Proposed Out Door Sales Markets:
The following requests and inquiries have been made regarding planned and potential out
door sales /markets /stands:
1. The owner of Max Sun Foods, 6350 Brooklyn Boulevard, has submitted a proposal to
operate a Farmer's Market for Minnesota Grown vegetables and fruits, that would
operate Friday, Saturday, and Sundays from June 15th thru October 31St.
2. Mr. Bobbie Fern, the owner of the large garden area in the Southwest quadrant of
Brooklyn Boulevard and Bass Lake Road, has indicated plans to continue a community
garden activity on his property with the sales of the produce by charitable
organization. He has also indicated a desire by the charitable organization to
expand /supplement the market with other produce donated by other
farming /charitable operations.
3. Ms Yang, the organizer of last year's Farmer's Market, has indicated that she is working
with Cub Foods in providing a market this year and is interested in a applying for a 30
week permit. An application or proposal has not been submitted for our review as of
this time.
Brooklyn Center Farmers Market
6350 Brooklyn Blvd
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
Vera: 651- 246 -9827
Che: 651- 343 -8098
Dear Director of Business and Development: Gary Eitel,
The Brooklyn Center Farmer's Market's business hours will from 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM;
Friday thru Sunday; from June 15'" 2010 thru October 31" 2010. Only vegetables and fruits that
are Minnesota home grown on farm area are to be present. Arts, crafts, and frozen meats of any
are prohibited at the location.
ank You,
r
CHAW 6W _
� R IS 0.73 FELT
r END IS OO__'4 FEET
UNK FENCE CORNE SOUTH OF PROPERTY LINE ' -'..: ;.; •. ' q• - "
SOU OF PROPERTY LINE —
I r N89°58'31 "E 1062.`.
n ND ICE E IS 0.73 FEET — — — — — — — — — -- r—
27 PROPERTY LINE
W -- W W W —� - -�- W --
SETBACK LINE CONCRETE CURB
.� WALL
CONCRETE CURB 1 T U M I N 0 U; S
CONCRETE CURB MONITOR 3 , g• „_
rFOUND PK NAIL WELL
\
I
_ _ __ - _ _ __ _ 26 PA KI A S
Fm pip an
\ S
185.27 - 1z - -- n
N T y � L
— RAI U U `•I'
ADDITION DRAINAGE AND
RAMIBOWS GARADDITION _ -_
j-
UTpJTY EASEMENT
GE AND UnUTY I S 1 PER RAINBOWS
VS f.ANOFN CITY ADOIRd17 PER K
W Y / - AR IN - _ _ _ _ _ 15 A IN _ _ _ _ _ P I G GARDEN CITY ADDIn1
4 w PA ES - CUB A i \�
d -2 P G
C C ETE
r 22�
P KING SP CE
\ J
€i� z z r
• SEWER
/
N S
J �''�'
\` Do 3 - - -- ID P KW
44111h_
fA AR IN A S NC AR IN b A S ODIERATOR ` , QAIE I II
Jd -- P R C A 5 - + `' < •O... S . -- o Z 1 STORY P RKI G A ES P 3 c � Li'' y- • � ILDING sT vs I IIf
S A S <p o -- OYERNANC I . 50 p..., .,, �• '
/ '� -WALL • Iii
T G FOOTPRINT
6 3� / •. a q
1 I II
'b : TRA$H
x 3 W p T - '• couvAC7Dns' � � I;
• I _ _ __ _ 1 P KI G S - -- - _ "� P AC 5 w < ('� `S . _ R - 76.601' 0
I. A ¢ a
M < 0 RE FEET Z I j
ec n W
1 i N89 Ja E c.. .gip' a6 . � ^ -
d1RB 1 AG I� I�
CRETE ; % ;:``�::•.• ) - � / /^ 0 I �
—�� 9 « V — T I r I II• ��
iOUND PK NAE. � PK NAIL < ��� < • T Y - - , 1 . ; ma � yy__ - ���(+f( Z
17
< � I
1
P KI G A S - -- - - PG rd 2� S70Ry >KER ICI C
` '' l
3
17 PA KI C A S
'u' m 1 J. V i 's �� /.6 / • Iii ' �_
�'� I A C� ,• LWALL
TRASW
I IJ
Y �Mp
P RKN _ _ _ __ _ _ _ ,•• ACTOR I�r - C
\ NAGE AND UTILITY I
0 -----
T PER RA
~
EAS I
ENNBOWS 0 - -
\ 7moN I � --- - -- --- -- - x v c P --- -- --- ---- - .. ;•cATE, - '”
Q o
NDEO
_ �0..
� DROP BOX
1b -T} \`` I �N �•' P A 5 d P KIN A 5 _ �� ,•. 11192/ , 8' WATER 11,M111
77 �G`1�0 ill
K
� O
_ . ... _ ... _,.. _. .. .._.. .,...�... . ;.. - _
- ... _ ill.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission Members
From: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development
DATE: June 8, 2009
SUBJECT: Discussion Regarding Expanding an Administrative Permit to Allow a
Farmer's Market to operate within the Brookdale Mall Parking Lot on 18
Days Between June 21, thru October 18, 2009
Proposed Farmer's Market
The City has received a request to allow the operation of a Farmer's market within the
Brookdale Center parking lot on Sundays from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00p.m. during the summer
and fall of 2009 ( June 21St to October 18th).
The request has been approved by the Brookdale Mall management to occur within the
eastern portion of the mall parking lot (previously identified as the Wal -Mart lot).
The applicant has indicated that the goal for this year's farmer's market would be to have
25 vendors that would provide a variety of produce, crafts and food stands.
The applicant has also indicated a preference to expand the market up to 50 vendors and is
considering other sites that could provide a long term location, such as the Hennepin
County Library site or the Brooklyn Center High School site.
Zoning
The Brookdale Mall is zoned PUD /C -2 (Planned Unit Development Unit Development/
Commerce). The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) district is to promote
flexibility in land development and redevelopment, preserve aesthetically significant and
sensitive site features, conserve energy and ensure a high quality of design.
The Planning Commission has reviewed and recommended approval of development plans
for the Brookdale Mall:
March 9, 1999 - Development plan for the expansion, redevelopment and
rejuvenation of Brookdale Center.
September 17, 2007 - Development Plan to allow the construction of 184,500 sq. ft.
Wal -Mart Super Center.
The PUD provisions provide that any major amendment to the development plan may be
approved by the City Council following the same notice and hearing procedures specified
in this section. An amendment shall be considered major if it involves any change greater
Page 1
than that permitted by Subdivision 5d of this section. Changes which are determined by
the City Council to be minor may be made if approved by the Planning Commission after
such notice and hearing as may be deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission.
Changes which are determined by the City Council to be minor may be made if approved
by the Planning Commission after such notice and hearing as may be deemed appropriate
by the Planning Commission.
Attached is a copy of the 2007 revised development plan with the proposed location of the
farmer's market.
Administrative Permits:
Section 35 -800 of the zoning ordinance allows the city's zoning official to issue
Administrative permits for the following purposes or uses:
1. Tents, stands and other temporary structures for church functions, civic functions,
charities, carnivals, and similar purposes for a period not exceeding 10 days. The permit
fee shall be as set forth by City Council resolution. Certificates of insurance may be
required to assure the public welfare
2. Out of door retail sale, storage and display of merchandise or offering of services when
accessory to or promoting a permitted use or a special use within a nonresidential zoning
district as follows:
a. The out of door retail sale, display, and storage of nursery and garden
merchandise, including lawn furniture and equipment, for a period not to exceed
30 consecutive weeks in any one calendar year. The permit fee shall be as set
forth by City Council resolution.
b. Miscellaneous out of door retail sales or displays or promotional events for
periods not to exceed 10 consecutive days. Two such 10 day permits may be
allowed per premises per calendar year. The permit fee shall be as set forth by
City Council resolution.
Attached is a copy of Section 35 -800 for you reference.
With respect to the above provisions of the zoning code, I would like to discuss two options:
1. The provision, a period not exceeding ten days for church functions, civic functions,
charities, carnivals and similar purposes.
Question: Does this provision relate exclusively to non - profit activities or does the
inclusion of carnivals expand the similar purposes to include an activity, such as a
farmer's market?
Question: Is it reasonable to imply that the term period, could mean a time period from
June to October in which not more than ten dates could be used?
Page 2
Question: Would it be reasonable to exercise the flexibility referenced within a PUD to
allow a seasonal administrative permit for a farmer's market as part of a commercial use?
2. The other option is to expand the provisions for a period not to exceed 30 consecutive
weeks for outdoor retail sale, display and storage of nursery and garden merchandise to
include a farmer's market.
Question: Could this farmer's market be used as a pilot event from which the City would
develop a definition of allowable activities, uses and parameters for operation for future
farmer's market applications?
Page 3
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
JUNE 11, 2009
CALL TO ORDER
The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Rahn at 7:06 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Chair Sean Rahn, Commissioners Joann Campbell- Sudduth, Kara Kuykendall, Stan Leino, Carlos
Morgan, and Michael Parks were present. Also present were Secretary to the Planning
Commission/Planning and Zoning Specialist Ronald Warren, and Planning Commission
Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. Della Young was absent and excused.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES — MAY 28, 2009
There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall,
to approve the minutes of the May 28, 2009 meeting as submitted. The motion passed.
CHAIR'S EXPLANATION
Chair Rahn explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the
Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the
Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final
decisions in these matters.
APPLICATION NO. 2009 -003 HOLIDAY COMPANIES
Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2009 -003, a request for Site and Building Plan approval
and a Special Use Permit to redevelop a new convenience store /gasoline station at the southeast
corner of County Road 10 and Xerxes Avenue North (5710 Xerxes Avenue North). The plan
proposes to demolish the existing structures and to build a new 4,350 sq. ft. convenience store on
the southerly portion of the site with five pump islands under a 30 ft. by 136 ft. canopy on the
northerly portion of the site.
Mr. Warren presented the staff report describing the location of the property and the proposal.
(See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 6 -11 -09 for Application No. 2009 -003 and
the Director of Public Works /City Engineer's report dated 6- 11 -09, attached.)
PUBLIC HEARING — APPLICATION NO. 2009 -003
There was a motion by Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to open the
public hearing on Application No. 2009 -003, at 8:03 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
Chair Rahn called for comments from the public.
Mr. John Baregi, Holiday Companies, introduced himself to the Commission.
6 -11 -09
Page 1
Commissioner Leino asked the applicant if there was a similar Holiday in the metro area that the
Commission could look at. Mr. Baregi responded that a similar Holiday is located at Hwy 610
and Broadway Avenue.
Commissioner Kuykendall asked if it is common for a transport to drive under a canopy. Mr.
Baregi responded that Holiday has a minimum canopy height of 14.6 ft. which allows for adequate
room for transports to go under the canopy.
Chair Rahn asked if the station would be open 24 hours. Mr. Baregi responded that it is their
intention to be open 24 hours.
Commissioner Parks asked the applicant to address the need to push the building to the back of the
property and create a smaller setback from the rear property line. Mr. Baregi responded that in
order to keep their proto - typical store building, it was best to place it on the lot in this manner
especially with a site that is less than an acre. He added that to allow for proper orientation and
circulation of vehicles around the pumps and traffic flow, this is the best possible layout.
Mr. Warren added that the original plan submitted included a car wash which created an extremely
tight site, so the car wash was omitted.
Commissioner Campbell- Sudduth asked for clarification of traffic flow from Xerxes. Mr. Baregi
replied that there would be adequate room to enter and exit from the two access points, one from
Xerxes and the other off County Road 10. He added that their plan is to close the westerly access
off County Road 10.
Chair Rahn asked about the parking spaces on the site and if the proposed number would meet the
needs of the customers. Mr. Baregi responded that the proposed layout on the site, will have
adequate customer parking even though they will have less pavement and more green space than is
currently on the site.
No other persons from the public appeared before the Commission during the public hearing on
Application No. 2009 -003.
CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
There was a motion by Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Morgan, to close the
public hearing on Application No. 2009 -003, at 8:16 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners.
Commissioner Leino stated that he feels that the proposal being considered by the Commission
will be a great improvement to the area.
Commissioner Campbell- Sudduth asked when construction is scheduled to begin. Mr. Baregi
responded that their plan is to begin in late July or early August 2009.
The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application.
6 -11 -09
Page 2
i
ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 2009 -003 HOLIDAY
COMPANIES
There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Leino, to
recommend to the City Council that it approve Application No. 2009 -003, submitted by Holiday
Companies, a request for Site and Building Plan approval and a Special Use Permit to redevelop a
new convenience store /gasoline station at the southeast corner of County Road 10 and Xerxes
Avenue North (5710 Xerxes Avenue North), subject to the following considerations:
1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with
respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits.
2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval
by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits.
3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be
determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits to
assure the completion of all site improvements.
4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical equipment
shall be appropriately screened from view.
5. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet
NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance
with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances.
6. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate
site maintenance.
7. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City
Ordinances.
8. B -612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas except for
where the City Engineer may approve a lesser standard in deference to plan
considerations.
9. The applicant shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility
service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee.
10. All work performed and materials used for construction of the utilities shall conform to
the City of Brooklyn Center current standard specifications and details.
11. Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site during
construction as approved by the Engineering Department and the applicant shall obtain
an NPDES construction site erosion control permit from the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency prior to disturbing the site.
12. The owner of the property shall enter into an appropriate trail easement within the green
strip area along County Road 10 and an easement for the bus bench/shelter area along
6 -11 -09
Page 3
Xerxes Avenue as approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building
permits.
13. The owner of the property shall enter into a proof of parking agreement to provide up to
24 parking spaces on the site upon a determination by the City, to be constructed within
one year, that such parking is needed.
14. The applicant shall obtain formal approval of the access arrangement along County
Road 10 from Hennepin County Transportation Department and any necessary permits
prior to the issuance of building permits by the City.
15. The owner of the property shall enter into an easement and agreement for the
maintenance and inspection of utility and storm drainage systems as approved by the
City Engineer prior to the issuance of building pemits.
Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Campbell- Sudduth, Kuykendall, Leino,
Morgan, and Parks.
The motion passed unanimously.
The Council will consider the application at June 22, 2009 meeting. The applicant must be
present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require
that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration.
DISCUSSION ITEM — FARMER'S MARKET
Mr. Warren explained that the Commission was being asked to discuss the possibility of allowing
a Farmer's Market in an outdoor market type setting. Mr. Warren added that typically outdoor
sales of merchandise is not allowed except for what is allowed under Administrative Land Use
Permits. He further explained that the city does allow various garden centers (not an open air
produce market) throughout the city as allowed with an Administrative Land Use Permit for a
period of not more than 30 consecutive weeks. Other types of outdoor activities are allowed on
commercial properties but are limited to two permits per calendar year not to exceed ten
consecutive days.
Ms. Paome Yang, 5400 80 Avenue in Brooklyn Park, addressed the Commission and stated that
she would like to operate a Farmer's Market at the Brookdale Parking lot on Sundays from June
21 thru October 18 on Sundays from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
Mr. Warren explained to the Commission that what was before them was a consideration to allow
an activity such as a Farmer's Market similar to what is allowed for garden centers under the
Administrative Land Use Permit process.
Commissioner Campbell- Sudduth asked if any research was done regarding how other cities have
handled this type of request.
Chair Rahn asked for some details from Ms. Yang regarding what kind of activities will take place
at the Farmer's Market.
6 -11 -09
Page 4
Ms. Yang described to the Commission what area of the Brookdale parking lot the Farmer's
Market will be located on. Commissioern Kuykendall asked for further information regarding
what types of merchandise will be available at the Farmer's Market. Ms. Yang responded that she
expects about 20 food produce booths and she is still looking for crafters and food vendors. She
clarified that the food being sold will be locally grown.
Chair Rahn asked Ms. Yang how the products will be displayed. Ms. Yang explained that each
vendor brings in their own tent and sets up their own products for display and sale. She added that
the vendors are responsible for clean up at the end of the day.
Mr. Warren pointed out to the Commission that this is a proposed commercial activity and what
the Commission should be considering is whether to amend the requirements for the
Administrative Land Use Permit (which allows for outdoor sales of merchandise) based on the
impact that the proposed activity will have on the commercial use in the area.
Commissioner Campbell- Sudduth asked if Ms. Yang has considered using a space such as a
parking lot at an apartment building or a school building and setting up the business on a
temporary basis for ten days at a time.
Chair Rahn stated that the alternative locations mentioned by Commissioner Campbell- Sudduth
would create the same zoning concerns and Administrative Land Use Permits are only issued for
commercially zoned property.
Mr. Warren explained that the Commission's responsibility is to consider in what manner the city
ordinances should be amended, if at all, to accommodate this type of use on commercially zoned
property.
Commissioner Leino stated that there currently is not a mechanism to allow this proposal to
proceed beyond the ten day window. He added that this feels very rushed and more research
needs to be done before any changes are made to existing ordinances.
Ms. Yang stated that she operates Farmer's Markets in other communities such as Brooklyn Park
and St. Paul.
Commissioner Morgan asked Ms. Yang how Brooklyn Park handles the zoning of a Farmer's
Market. Ms. Yang responded that she does not know. Chair Rahn suggested that city staff gather
more information to allow the Commission to better make a decision.
Mr. Warren further cautioned the Commission from allowing a commercial type of use in a
residential zone, specifically allowing the Farmer's Market on school property which is
residentially zoned since this type of proposal would increase traffic in the area
Commissioner Kuykendall suggested that an ordinance amendment be made to allow outdoor
sales such as a Farmer's Market to operate the same as a nursery or garden center.
Chair Rahn stated that he thinks it is important to first define what a Farmer's Market is and
determine how other communities have handled them.
6 -11 -09
Page 5
Mr. Warren noted that it may be possible to allow a Farmer's Market at Brookdale during the time
that Ms. Yang is considering with the cooperation of Brookdale Shopping Center. He noted that
each tenant at Brookdale, or existing tenant space, is entitled to two ten -day permits. If Brookdale
Management is agreeable to allow the use of the permits for spaces they own and/or control, than
such permits could be issued and cover the period of time while ordinance amendment language
could be developed meeting Planning Commission and City Council concerns.
Mr. Warren also suggested that the Commission consider an amendment to Section 35 -800 of the
city ordinances which addresses out of door retail sales of nursery and garden merchandise for a
period of 30 days, in commercially zoned property only, to also allow a Farmer's Market. He
cautioned the Commission that by doing so, this would open up other types of activities on some
of the vacant commercial properties in the city and that is why it is important to establish a
definition for a Farmer's Market in the ordinance.
Chair Rahn called for a motion supporting consideration of a Farmer's Market concept and to
allow staff to develop a definition for a Farmer's Market and to research the topic in order to
amend the ordinance to allow such a use.
There was a motion by Commissioner Campbell- Sudduth, seconded by Commissioner Leino to
direct staff to report back to the City Council that the Planning Commission supports the concept
of a Farmer's Market and would like staff to further define the concept in the City Ordinance and
to further develop recommendations for implementation under the Administrative Land Use
process.
Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Campbell- Sudduth, Kuykendall, Leino,
Morgan, and Parks.
The motion passed unanimously.
OTHER BUSINESS
Mr. Warren recommended that the June 25, 2009 be cancelled so that Commission members can
attend the Earle Brown Days parade in light of the fact also that there are no business items for
consideration.
There was no other business.
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Campbell- Sudduth, to
adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting
adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
Chair
Recorded and transcribed by:
Rebecca Crass
6 -11 -09
Page 6
CONSULTING GROUP r INC MINNEAPOLIS
I
E N G I N E E R S I P L A N N E R S I DESIGNERS FARGO
MADISON
CEAP Development SRF No. 0096820
Average Daily Traffic Volume Summary
April 20, 2010
INTRODUCTION
As requested, a summary of the average daily traffic (ADT) volume impacts was developed
based on the proposed CEAP development. The summary documents the methodology and ADT
volume impacts associated with the proposed access changes and additional trip generation from
the CEAP development. The information was used to determine the magnitude of the impacts to
71st Avenue, the proposed CEAP access locations, and the neighborhood to the west of the
development.
METHODOLOGY
The most recent available ADTs are from the year 2007 and are shown on the attached figure.
Existing peak hour turning movement counts were collected as part of the CEAP Site Traffic
Study, dated February 8, 2010. These turning movement counts were used to determine the
proportion of peak hour volume, with respect to the ADT, at known locations. The average peak
hour volume, with respect to the ADT, was approximately nine percent and 10 percent for the
a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively (ex. Brooklyn Boulevard ADT — 31,900 vehicles per day;
p.m. peak hour volume — 3,086 vehicles (approximately 10 percent of the ADT)).
This methodology was applied to existing turning movements at locations where ADT volumes
were not previously collected (i.e. 71st Avenue). Once estimated, ADTs were calculated from
the existing a.m. and p.m. peak hour turning movement volumes and averaged to develop the
approximate ADT for the segment. The same methodology was used to develop the future
ADTs at the CEAP access locations (71st Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard) and 71st Avenue
east and west of the proposed CEAP access.
IMPACTS
The existing and future ADT review identified the magnitude of impact on the adjacent
roadways based on the proposed CEAP development. It should be noted that this information
was documented for Scenario 2 conditions since it is the preferred alternative. The ADT review
indicates the volume on 71st Avenue east of the CEAP access will increase. The increase is
primarily associated with the CEAP expansion. The ADT along 71st Avenue west of the CEAP
access will decrease. The decrease along 71st Avenue west of the CEAP access can be attributed
to the closure of the existing Willow Lane School access along Perry Avenue. A significant
amount of motorists that previously used the access locations along Perry Avenue will now be
able to directly enter the school area without traveling along 71st Avenue west of the CEAP
access. The potential remains for CEAP traffic to enter the neighborhood; however the amount
is expected to be negligible.
H: \Projects\6820�TS\Repo rA] 00420_Final_CEAPADTs_TS. doc
www.srfconsulting.com
One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150 1 Minneapolis, MN 55447 -4443 1 763.475.0010 Fax: 763.475.2429
An Equal Opportunity Employer
pllA
Cig
- .., �/� 'v � 0 1Z �' m m j •ql ` 'c ^ � ` j l
L_.. .... ' �' �f AV u�99 f
O 4 4391 rn 02i N �'3AV�' t .L9 O 7
AV
66
x33H9 i., c o nz Z5! AV o
3AV 4� 8 v r* C {
r jyJ ,� v I r n ilnz �I� rn c 8~ � N
Oi. z x i
oar 1 �, 0�} T ` i()�T sai ��1 � I ° I A f 1 o b
< , J �VSan i� ' zc :IIn AV ( {��, j ` 4169 0�1
J •`n t .. 2 ,�
av� .ratu�ad � �In � ;; �i A r" _ I `� < , ` t�y•Fbt �.1
aD m N n J 3Atl 4; Msn m
C`
AV r rv �� . i LJ t3I� S fC 4
a -.� d3 )Q1A I `--' n r' ' i� �nz!! I� rn ' `•' x'21 J �{ d.�.si7
AV J' 't D:u! `� SONOd 11
.q f 3 i'O OM
5�
Lz az n
ZZ I Z h,
miza c, �ao�ltiv .sue c,7,,,r�j
Nol ?1 \ ti
fdA
Gary Eitel
From: Schraad, Mike [MSchraad @WelshCo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:36 AM
To: Gary Eitel
Subject: FW: FW: CEAP
Gary,
Below are two e -mails from SRF that I believe add clarity to the traffic on Perry related to the proposed development. Let
me know if you still have questions. Thanks.
Mike Schraad
Vice President
Welsh Construction, LLC
952.897.7862 tel 1 952.292.3883 cell
Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail.
From: Matthew Pacyna [ mailto :mpacyna @srfconsulting.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:31 AM
To: Schraad, Mike
Subject: RE: FW: CEAP
Sorry for the confusion. I think the most simple way to term it should be the following:
- 71st Ave (west of the CEAP access) and Perry Ave (north of the current school access locations) will see a decrease in
traffic volume of approximately 450 vehicles per day (new ADT will be approximately 225 vehicles per day on this
segment).
- Perry Ave (south of the current school access locations) will see a minimal increase of 60 vehicles per day. This
equates to approximately one additional car every five to 10 minutes during the peak hour.
Please let me know if this further clarifies the issues. Thanks.
Matt
Matthew Pacyna, P.E.
Senior Engineer
SRF Consulting Group
One Carlson Parkway N.
Suite 150
Minneapolis, MN 55447
Phone: 763 - 475 -0010
Fax: 763 - 475 -2429
E -Mail: mpacyna(absrfconsulting com
1
>>> "Schraad, Mike" <MSchraad @WelshCo.com> 4/20/2010 5:19 PM >>>
Matt,
The last sentence is confusing.
Mike Schraad
Vice President
Welsh Construction, LLC
952.897.7862 tel 1 952.292.3883 cell
Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail.
From: Matthew Pacyna [ mailto :mpacyna @srfconsulting.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 5:06 PM
To: Schraad, Mike
Subject: Re: FW: CEAP
Mike,
Gary has the impacts to 71st Avenue described correctly.
Existing ADT: 675 vpd
Future ADT: 225 vpd
Result: 450 vpd reduction along 71st Avenue West of the CEAP access and along Perry Avenue (north of the existing
school access locations).
The 225 vpd includes the 60 vpd from the CEAP site. The 225 vpd does not include vehicles that currently use Perry
from the south to access the school. This information was not collected as part of the traffic study. However, since the
school is not a typical elementary school, it does not necessarily draw trips from the immediate adjacent neighborhoods.
This indicates that school trips would be more likely to come from Brooklyn Boulevard than Perry/69th. Therefore, the
increase along 71st from school trips currently along Perry would be minimal and the 225 vpd is an accurate estimate.
Let me know if this clarifies the issues. Thanks Mike.
Matt
Matthew Pacyna, P.E.
Senior Engineer
SRF Consulting Group
One Carlson Parkway N.
Suite 150
Minneapolis, MN 55447
Phone: 763 - 475 -0010
Fax: 763-475-2429
E -Mail: mpacyna(Dsrfconsulting com
>>> "Gary Eitel" < geitel @ci.brooklyn- center.mn.us> 4/20/2010 3:31 PM >>>
Mike,
Could you assist in responding to the City Manager's question on what the data is telling us for the impact on Perry
Street north and south of the school:
2
The exhibit indicates an ADT on 71 Ave. of 675.
The sketch then illustrates future ADT at 71 & Brooklyn Boulevard at 720 with 490 entering the new drive to the NW
Family Center and Willow Lane ECFE.
It illustrates 225 ADT entering on 71 Ave. with an arrow pointing in both directions.
If there were a simple mathematical exercise, I would subtract 225 from 675 and indicate a reduction of 450 ADT as a
result of the improvements.
I would then reference page 15 of the traffic study which indicates that the directional distribution analysis projects
that about 60 vehicles of the trips for the NW Family Service Center will likely use Perry Lane to access the site vs. using
Brooklyn Boulevard.
I would then want to confirm that the 60 vehicles are included in the 225 ADT?
Would you mind asking Mathew what would be an appropriate response to this question?
Gary
From: Steve Lillehaug
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 2:02 PM
To: Curt Boganey; Gary Eitel
Subject: RE: CEAP
The memo was very hard to follow. It somewhat says the same thing I did in my email yesterday pertaining to the
Perry /71 traffic impacts. However, the SRF memo makes even lighter of the traffic impacts and changes on Perry
Avenue relative to the CEAP expansion in the sense that SRF sums it up saying the impacts are "negligible ". I wouldn't
go as far as saying they are negligible but more rather "minimal ".
Steven L. Lillehaug, PE, PTOE
Director of Public Works /City Engineer I City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy I Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2113
763 - 569 -3328 direct 1763-569-3494 fax
slillehaugCcDci.brooklyn- center mn us
From: Curt Boganey
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 1 :56 PM
To: Gary Eitel
Cc: Steve Lillehaug
Subject: RE: CEAP
Gary,
What does this data mean specifically as it relates to Perry Street, North and South of the school?
From: Gary Eitel
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 11:40 AM
To: Curt Boganey
Cc: Steve Lillehaug
Subject: FW: CEAP
Attached is a memo from SRF regarding traffic projections associated with the NW Family Service Center and
reconfiguration of the 71" Ave. access.
3
C1tL OI
~,ra 1
F F g P i]roma `Ah < 9 n Tt!v1 AVe m �.',m rd J
{ ''Y la Trx1 Avx ¢
t4A J }NA'a %� Q J2n0Ace
PO TEN L TRAIL Brookl Ce nter
3 • ••
z f „ter ' omA CO N CTION
LVW
- H DT 2r1
g z MBOL
Figure
_
ORTHHENNEPIN = UARE
N
n
s > �. Planing Issues
A SHINGLE CREEK ” HUMBOCDT AVE. Ii 1AlY 2'S
(ExISTING) TRAIL OPPOMNMES
�A A. -F- Leg
..�� _.�
M ISSI SIPPI
schools
I t a s,m qre RI E
EbaW L u
Parks
CIVIC
City Center
aft CENTER \
_ Ir
rA BR N BLVD': '(\
\ \ Existing Trail
COfR' \� \_
RTCJ
0 00 Trail Connections
OPPO NITES
I ImproveFnent Arcs
Opportunity Site
Brookdale
POTENTIAL,TRAIL CONNECTION Northbrook
< • ._ \_.__ •, �Y• • • °1 HumboldtS uara
r • OR g O �������� II II III, '
.., • �OTENTIA L KEDEVELOPMENTe IIII IIIII CorridorOpportunitic�
Brooklyn Blvd.
'A"r • �' K*+.e wiure �,m < „. Humboldt Ave.
57th and Lyndale Ave.
r mi. o 194-
5 - `” �' S:eO AaeH � ALa N 5.9x0 AVeH 5�r0 AreN
+s 4 C
H' DO E 1,600 800 0 1,600 Feet
F.
o�P +
TEN
1030 rnmprehensirc Plan
City of Brooklyn Center in Cooperation with
Three Rivers Park District
Request for Proposal (RFP)
F fessional: Professional Consulting Services — Master Plan
ect: Twin Lakes Regional Trail /Greenway Trail /Redevelopment Concept
Proposal Due Date:
Primary Contact /Submit Proposal to:
Gary Eitel
Community Development Director
Brooklyn Center City Hall
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
(763) 569 -3305
geitel(s�ci.brooklyn- center mn us
Background
The City of Brooklyn Center continues to evaluate redevelopment options to provide the
highest quality vehicular and pedestrian amenities for their community. The redevelopment
of Bass Lake Road between Xerxes Avenue and State Highway 100 and partnership with
Three Rivers Park District (Park District) and Hennepin County for long -range regional trail
development and operations anchors this redevelopment initiative. The City of Brooklyn
Center and Park District entered into a cooperative agreement in 2009 for development and
operation of regional trails in the City of Brooklyn Center. This agreement includes
construction improvements between Xerxes Avenue and Shingle Creek Parkway including a
regional trail component. Partnership opportunities exist as continued redevelopment,
street reconstruction, and regional trail options are considered for the future.
A. General
The City of Brooklyn Center and Park District are seeking proposals from qualified
consulting firms to provide professional master planning services for potential
redevelopment initiatives including roadways, trails, sidewalks, and utilities. The
master planning services will require development of a feasibility report to identify
and quantify the components included in the master plan. A project description is
included as part of this document.
This RFP describes the services required and the process for selecting the qualified
consulting firm for this project.
Prospective firms shall submit three (3) copies of their proposal in a sealed envelope
along with the proposed fee outlining costs for all work in a separate envelope no
later than the date and time identified above to:
1
Gary Eitel
Community Development Director
Brooklyn Center City Hall
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
(763) 569 -3305
geitel(d)ci.brooklyn- center mn us
All proposals must be clearly marked - "Proposal for Twin Lakes Regional
Trail /Redevelopment Concept"
B. Scone of Services
All consulting services requested for this project are identified in this paragraph. All
other professional services required to complete these tasks are considered
incidental to the project and are to be accounted for by the consultant.
The optional services (Paragraphs B4 and 5B) are considered an optional service
whose inclusion in the overall project is dependent on proposed consulting fee and
city financing.
1. Basic Services - Inventory and Mapping
a. Current Infrastructure - accurate inventory and mapping of the area depicted
in Attachment A. Including but not limited to streets, sidewalks, utilities,
commercial, residential, and public land.
b. Base Map - development of base map of area depicted in Attachment A for
use in interactive discussions related to planning, design, and construction
alternatives.
c. Identification and depiction of general current vehicular and pedestrian traffic
patterns affecting, and within; the areas depicted in Attachment A.
2. Basic Services - Conceptual Regional Trail Alignments
a. Preparation and development of graphic illustrations identifying all potential
regional trail alignments connecting State Highway 100 to the Mississippi
River including:
i. identification of opportunities and constraints
ii, feasibility study including general cost breakdown
iii. anticipated vehicular and pedestrian traffic patterns as a result of
regional trail alignments
b. Evaluation, identification, prioritization and feasibility analysis of regional trail
alignments as related to long -range redevelopment opportunities to increase
public and private community value including cost /benefit analysis and
strategies for future development.
c. Develop recommendation for highest value regional trail alignment.
d. Staff meetings (as required).
e. Public open house (1) and requisite support documents.
f. City Planning and Council meetings and /or workshops (2).
g. Park District Committee, Board or workshop (2).
2
3. Basic Services - Regional Trail Master Plan
a. Consolidation of information and final recommended alignment into master
plan format for city, Park District, and Metropolitan Council review and
approval.
b. Master plan to address all requirements established by the Metropolitan
Council and Park District. Content and style sample attached (Attachments B
and C).
c. Draft master plan printing (40 copies).
d. City Council and Park District presentations (2 meetings).
e. Revisions to master plan as required by City Council, Park District or
Metropolitan Council.
f. Final master plan presentation - City Council and Park District (2 meetings).
g. Final master plan printing - 50 bound copies, 1 unbound copy, 1 digital/
electronic format.
4. Optional Services - Redevelopment Concept with Regional Trail
Component
a. Preparation and development of graphic illustrations identifying a potential
Redevelopment Concept including neighborhood, commercial and residential
redevelopment opportunities, and a regional trail, for the area depicted in
Attachment A. The Redevelopment Concept is further defined in Attachment
D.
i. Identification of opportunities and constraints.
ii. Feasibility study including general cost breakdown.
iii. Anticipated vehicular and pedestrian traffic patterns as a result of
Redevelopment Concept and regional trail component.
b. Comprehensive evaluation of Redevelopment Concept and regional trail
component defining long -range redevelopment opportunities to increase
public and private community value including, cost /benefit analysis and
strategies for future development and growth.
c. Develop short -term and long -range implementation strategies.
d. Staff meetings (as required).
e. Public open house (1) and requisite support documents.
f. City Planning and Council meetings and /or workshops (2)
g. Park District Committee, Board or workshop (2)
S. Optional Services - Revision of Regional Trail Master Plan to reflect
Redevelopment Concept and recommended alignment of regional trail
related to that redevelopment concept.
a. If optional service is selected, revise and modify Regional Trail Master Plan to
reflect regional trail component of the Redevelopment Concept.
6. Consultant Identified Support Services
a. Consultant shall prepare and describe, in detail, all additional services that
consultant has determined are required to perform and /or deliver deliverables
3
required as part of basic services - paragraphs B1, B2, and B3. Consultant
shall identify respective costs for these services and rationale why support
services are required and should be included in overall fee.
These support services are in addition to owner approved reimbursable
expense eligible through the consultant contract. See sample agreement for
reimbursable expenses (City).
b. Consultant shall prepare and describe, in detail, all additional services that
consultant has determined are required to perform and /or deliver deliverables
required as part of optional services - paragraphs B4 and B5. Consultant
shall identify respective costs for these services and rationale why support
services are required and should be included in overall fee.
C. Submittal Evaluation
The Selection Committee expects to review the proposals and formulate a consultant
contract for consideration by the Brooklyn Center City Council at their first meeting
in February 2010.
There will be no interview.
Two Three Rivers Park District staff members will be included in the Selection
Committee:
Kelly Grissman Del Miller
Planner Intergovernmental Relations Administrator
Three Rivers Park District Three Rivers Park District
3000 Xenium Lane N 3000 Xenium Lane N
Plymouth, MN 55441 Plymouth, MN 55441
763 - 694 -7635 763 - 559 -6754
K Grissman (a ) threeriversparkdistrict ora
- DMillerCa threeriversparkdistrict ora
The City of Brooklyn Center and Park District utilize the following criteria in selecting
and recommending a consultant that provides the best value in meeting the project
requirements:
1. Consultant's Statement of Solution
2. Project understanding, approach and coordination methods
3. Similar project experience
4. Consultant team and project manager qualifications
5. Schedule
Following an evaluation and ranking of all submitted proposals, the selection
committee will open and review all submitted fee proposals. Consultant fee will be
considered in determining the best value for this project.
D. Consultant Submittal
The proposal shall include, at a minimum, the following information:
1. Statement of Solution
Describe how your firm proposes to solve the challenges of this project and
include any opportunities that should be considered.
4
2. Project understanding, approach and coordination methods.
a. Consulting firm shall describe understanding of project and identify approach
to fulfill the scope of services and deliverable requirements.
b. Consulting firm shall summarize the key elements of the proposal and outline
reasons why your firm should be selected.
3. Similar Project Experience
Consulting firm shall identify similar project experience within the last three years
and provide a reference for each.
4. Consultant Team and Project Manager Qualifications
Consulting firm shall identify project manager, work preformed on similar
projects, and manager qualifications. Additional team members including
subconsultants, if required, shall be identified including previous experience and
qualifications.
5
S. Schedule
Consulting firm shall confirm the key work tasks, milestones, and critical path
based upon Park District's proposed project schedule. The proposed project
schedule for this project includes the following milestones:
[services/ Milestones
Basic Services B1: Inventory and Mapping Milestones Date:
Complete
Basic Services B2: Conceptual Regional Trail Alignment Milestones May 2010
Complete
Basic Services B3: Regional Trail Master Plan Milestones: Ma 2010
Project start March 2010
Existing regional trail documentation April 2010
Public Open House June 2010
Identification of preferred alignment July 2010
Draft Master Plan completed Aug 2010
City Council Review of Draft Master Plan Aug 2010
Park District Board Review of Draft Master Plan Aug 2010
Metropolitan Council Review (Park District staff responsibility) Sept /Oct
2010
Revisions to the Master Plan as required by City Oct 2010
Council/Board/Metropolitan Council
Final Master Plan printing Nov 2010
Park District Board approval of final Master Plan staff res onsibilit Nov 2010
Project close out Nov 2010
Optional Services B4: Redevelopment Concept Milestones
Project start March 2010
Identification of alternative housing redevelop ment /greenway April 2010
opportunities
Conceptual design graphics for each opportunity alternative, including May 2010
g reenway component.
Cost - benefit analysis of alternative OlDportunities. May 2010
Public Open house same as trail open house June 2010
City Council presentation July 2010
Final feasibility study report August
2010
Project component close out August
Optional Services BS: Revision of Regional Trail Master Plan to 2010
reflect Redevelopment Concept
If Option B5 is selected, milestones under this option will coincide with See above
131 -134 milestones
The consultant may elect to propose an alternate schedule as long as the Final
Master Plan and Feasibility Study are completed on or before December 31,
2010.
6
6. Fee Proposal
In a separate sealed envelop, the consulting firm shall identify fee for each phase
of work:
a. Basic Services: Paragraphs B1, B2, and B3
b. Optional Services: Paragraphs B4 and B5
C. Consultant Identified Support Services: Paragraph B6
The optional services fee should document the Optional Services cost - savings
realized by completing both the basic services and optional services under
one contract and in conjunction with each other.
Consulting firm shall identify total fee to complete described work with a
breakdown of tasks, estimated hours, and hourly rates for each staff member.
Costs for each phase of service shall be individually delineated. The total fee
shall reflect all costs, included but not limited to, sub - consultants, meeting
allowance, specified deliverables, overhead, profit and reimbursables.
The fee shall be structured as hourly not -to- exceed or propose a fee structure as
viewed by your firm, as appropriate.
7. Budget
The scope of this project includes an urban planning component (housing
redevelopment assessment). Consequently, to ensure the ability to hire a full -
service consultant that meets the needs of the City of Brooklyn Center and Park
District, the Request- for - Proposal and all related contracts will be managed by
the City of Brooklyn Center.
Financing for Basic Services: Twin Lakes Regional Trail Master Plan
Services has been secured by the Park District and the City of Brooklyn Center.
All consultant costs associated with Basic Services will be equally shared by the
City, and the Park District.
Financing for the Optional Services: Greenway Trail/ Redevelopment
Concept will be the responsibility of the City of Brooklyn Center. Election to
obtain the desired optional services will be at the discretion of the City.
Attachments
Attachment A: Study Area
Attachment B: Regional Trail Master Plan Guidelines and Style Example
Attachment C: Typical Regional Trail Cross Section
Attachment D: Redevelopment Concept
7
Attachment A: Study Area
Existing Shingle?
I � $
Creek RT
x
�f 3
� a�
�.
Study, Area
"9
VW
W KKK
Ito Rte`
4.
x ,
V Existino Twin Lakes RT'
U4 r
P Existing North Mississippi
04 >� Regional Park Trail
• v; �'€ ` a 3 ',r {Y
Study Area is defined as area bounded on the:
• North - by 58 Ave N
• South - by 53r Ave N
• West - by Shingle Creek Regional Trail
• East - by North Mississippi Regional Park Trail
8
Attachment B: Regional Trail Master Plan Guidelines and Style Example
Regional Trail Background
As envisioned, Twin Lakes Regional Trail is a connector regional trail, starting at its junction
with the Crystal Lake Regional Trail in Robbinsdale, connecting to the Shingle Creek
Regional Trail in Brooklyn Center, and terminating at a junction with the North Mississippi
Regional Park trail on the west side of the river. The trail traverses a fully developed
community, providing local and regional residents with access to downtown Robbinsdale,
the Brookdale Mall shopping area, Brooklyn Center City Hall and Hennepin County Library
(via the Shingle Creek Regional Trail), a local elementary school, and North Mississippi
Regional Park. The Twin Lakes Regional Trail will connect into the 100+ miles of the Three
Rivers Park District regional trail network (see Map 1).
When completed, Twin Lakes Regional Trail will be approximately 4 miles in length. As of
2009, approximately the western -most 2.25 miles of regional trail have been constructed,
from Twin Lakes Park north to the intersection of Xerxes Ave N and Bass Lake Road (CSAH
10). An additional 0.25 mile segment of trail is scheduled to be completed from Xerxes Ave
N east to Shingle Creek Parkway along Bass Lake Rd /CSAH 10 in 2010 (See Map 2)
The alignment for the remaining 1.5 miles of regional trail 'has not been determined. The
desire to determine the preferred alignment and to be able to complete development of the
regional trail has led to this project RFP.
The Master Plan Services project's primary goals are to:
1) Identify the preferred alignment of the portion of trail that has not been
constructed; and
2) Development of a Regional Trail Master Plan for the entire trail using Three Rivers
Park District Master Plan standards and which meets the requirements of the
Metropolitan Council.
To reach these goals, the following objectives are required:
A. The preferred regional trail alignment should maximize benefits associated with
regional trails while balancing:
■ Trail user safety
• Potential use levels,
■ The quality of the trail experience,
• Local area planning,
■ Local area benefits,
■ Impacts on the local neighborhoods.
B. The process must engage the local community and the interested public.
C. The Master Plan must meet the requirements of the Metropolitan Council through the
inclusion of the following elements within the master plan:
Master Plan Requirements as Defined by the Metropolitan Council
1. Boundaries and Acquisition Costs: A list of parcels to be acquired (or
obtained through easement and the estimated total cost and schedule for
their acquisition; information on natural resources (see natural resources item
11 below), site suitability, special assessments and other conditions that
affect acquisition of the site or location of the boundaries.
1
Attachment B: Regional Trail Master Plan Guidelines and Style Example
2. Stewardship Plan: A program for managing park property, including
activities, expenses and anticipated revenue prior to developing the property
for recreation purposes. Planned nonrecreation uses and disposition of
revenue from such use should be detailed.
3. Demand Forecast: The recreational demand to be met by the site as
identified by the Council, the regional park implementing agency or other
sources.
4. Development Concept: A plan for recreational development and natural
resource management, including schedule and cost estimates for each project
and the approximate capacity of each facility. Conflicts between recreational
and natural- resource management needs in developing the park /trail unit
should be addressed and resolved. Amendments to an acquisition -phase
master plan should be made prior to funding recreation and visitor support
facilities if there is insufficient detail on the scale and cost of the facility.
Alternatively, the final design /engineering phase of a proposed facility should
be funded first, with construction funding provided in a separate capital
improvement grant.
5. Conflicts: Identification of conflicts with other existing or proposed projects
or land uses affecting the park /trail unit, including steps necessary for their
resolution.
6. Public Services: A description of any nonrecreational public services and
facilities, such as roads or sewers, needed to accommodate the proposed
recreational use, including the timing of these services and the arrangements
necessary to provide them.
7. Operations: Rules, regulations or ordinances affecting the site, including
estimated operations and maintenance costs and sources of revenue to
operate and maintain recreation facilities and to manage natural resources in
the park /trail unit. The operations plan should also indicate how energy to
operate and maintain the park unit is being managed and conserved. The
plan should also state how solid waste from park users is recycled and
disposed of consistent with applicable laws.
8. Citizen Participation: A process to involve affected municipalities and the
general public in the master planning. The process must include, but not be
limited to, timely notice to the affected municipality and an opportunity to be
heard. The master plan should include a summary of comment received with
emphasis on issues raised.
9. Public Awareness: Plans for making the public aware of services available
when the regional trail is open, including cooperative measures with the
Council's regionwide awareness program.
10. Special Needs: A plan that identifies special populations to be served by the
facility and addresses accessibility, affordability and other measures designed
to ensure that the facility can be used by members of special population
groups.
11. Natural Resources: As part of the master plan, there should be a natural -
resource management component that includes:
2
Attachment B: Regional Trail Master Plan Guidelines and Style Example
a. Natural Resources Inventory (NRI) as a part of the master plan
process. An NRI should include a land cover inventory that is
consistent with the Minnesota Land Cover Classification system
developed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the
Metro Geographic Information System - a consortium of government
entities in the region that create, manage and share digital geographic
data. It is the same format used in the Metro Greenways program.
Using the same NRI format will assure compatibility with other natural
resource inventories that have been completed or will be done in the
metropolitan region. The natural resource inventory should include
native plant communities mapped in the Minnesota County Biological
Survey and listed (rare, endangered, and threatened) species
documented in the Natural Heritage Information System
b. The Natural Resource Inventory should be a basis for
projects /proposals to restore degraded resources and maintain high -
quality natural resource features, including the estimated capital costs
of natural resource restoration projects. Implementing agencies should
consult with natural resource professionals in the design and final
construction of park facilities, especially trails, that are adjacent to or
cross over natural resource areas. The final design and construction
should allow the public to view and enjoy these natural habitats with
minimal adverse impact on that habitat.
c. Information on how surface water and groundwater resources in the
unit, including wetlands, will be protected. This should include
standards and requirements that are consistent with the Council's
model ordinance for stormwater management. The master plan should
include provisions to, first, avoid wetland impacts; second, minimize
impacts; and, finally, mitigate impacts when no other options are
available.
d. Information on how vegetation will be managed. Vegetation
management is important for maintaining water quality, preserving
plants, and providing bird and wildlife habitat. It involves protection of
old growth trees and rare and endangered plant species, control of
exotic species, forest management practices, vegetative buffers on
water bodies, and consideration of hard surfaces, including shortly
mowed turf. The DNR's "Guidelines for Managing and Restoring Natural
Plant Communities along Trails and Waterways" is a good reference.
State Critical Area guidelines /standards on vegetation management
and resource protection should be addressed in master plans of parks
and trails within the Mississippi River Critical Area /Mississippi National
River and Recreation Area.
Three Rivers Park District Master Plan Template:
Three Rivers Park District uses universal content and style templates for all of its master
plans to ensure consistency and completeness. The content template reflects the required
master plan elements set forth by the Metropolitan Council, but is organized in a more
logical order and chapter structure to increase accessibility to the document. The style
template uses Adobe In- design software. Other software may be used, as long as the
master plan shares similar style with previous Three Rivers' master plans.
3
Attachment B: Regional Trail Master Plan Guidelines and Style Example
The Rush Creek Regional Trail Master Plan was the most recently completed trial master
plan by the Park District. The following page snapshots reflect the style and content used in
developing the master plan document. An electronic copy of the Rush Creek Master Plan is
available upon request.
Cover Page Executive Summary
77ireeRivers Executive Summary
PARK DISTRICT
U:,rAr. u P :•
» w,ar c , r n. <oorcn m Oro« Rvn x craw.wasa-
R.k Rae«Ya wR:, r•4„ r;•µ4 Y:a. ,:,... , re:l arr.r aA caw anrd, ar:: aep
a:vk, ',w L'nA w:f k.Arw' w:sx ; rrnk t,: s4: n:GS xr; ,vEl I,xw4�r,ca r JAVS. ::il:n,d
rnfa4sx xrnY�l.'A waikM; rr,>MC M1kA rr:rES rrxuMtxat nv:Y W TM w:aM1
tcurY,Rerrtl.r�i takx.,e a •, u a lx ,U�wst hs'I e:,,ns iM wMaa k,gtn r /nxJmn Ilxrp�:,
ya: -� <cn' «yr:tk <n rvrL'wrn W 4 r
1
'3 ,� � ( 1 S." W nk J�wM CW ! .q•J [ IxJ Rvk U t W.:E r
1 t Ek. erL Igrk (, U 1 L4.
4 '
wb a+rca:
� ar�Rr• .wwx..,a .aea yr aarA. „ „. wsr�v.,aw, ws
� TM PaawJ Il 4 Ckn rrwl. Mk 4e.a+ - aM
Y ':,t wr R da ,vlly Mx
row •h - mst� p .t, MwmP. mRcan <mr:ril re yt rr
k
t Tnfw9. e 1st' r
y 1 ^ I t wixn Z-1 It - .1 _ aveY :! W m
M xd= twn ulwu wiU, k A:ov`::.yn Ha+
-x,aer w n...wxnrx rw:n x.l farAamA deww,»n, a rA:M :mu a,rwa.
w:W, Cr.wk gay T.x. �..vw Gp,. 111
Table of Contents Section Title Page
"Table of contents
sreLr:oN i ,;, ::I:,, rr—: „, .. SECTION I: _..
C. 7 :' , :,
Planning Framework
• • c xft. M ,.wk R e r Too t<fnx ka rrk fAam
1,'. t hn vlt
;it 7 l
io�w.Lalx a. ,y tM .and
:iE T.r � I
St +.T:v; `.I G4 t .Y 3:,5 t ;,_•nan :.............. •.. - "4 ,K J Wtaks mA rx4z
......... 4: RJr satvY, al U abste: Ybn rxr.Hev Ce:kyra:q w: Ur iMrawAran
.. ,.. ... qj aavral re, s;4 t M - R.
.. ..... n .4 aw tw w:uv
APPEND G; r,.. , .I.:ns.... ... ... •.x:::.r.,,.wMTM1,wa:rcrs
oaM [+.vb: a. o!o,nr,y xw n,xxry,Ay
................ a.A ba:s.
..............
.................. r.. Met ra. alltan Keg!orai p. ..
arks sys:ern
i`:r'.t E:C:h,i::9 • •. • . • • •. • 'La Tuna CRiw ':aumwlY+v'xriwrwlAlrrnr.a,tx, RyNmal [wks �Intw�
• •.. . •.. • • • •.. ' � Y •YaKi:utM aM:Meas h Aw
ce W rK.,niMn ana «xzrce Peavewn eMan t!,e:eQlan
a, rxxl RS aw,x,x ::re:✓:tM1.
Ty Nu: u.':M1tar
21 — N:ks Sva ;nn YRArdas )5 reykn,:l rests.
n,i4 iesenva, tt tta0l a,n wv spenal y;,aaun arras antl h sdl '
M avlry. CwmkM, tnxaere S:pf4�acreAalrretr¢eJkWA, w4,gerx,ea
w+,io-:µ o• .a eadmw te.rw: a.r» a «. em nea n ,aar :. TM
'e:,d!Aen Re4b al RMS 1 - 1 tt naM,p nI:O axk 4+gkma,Yny
,.wWrL::A w s:r tttaav 4;rx Uronro: !Mrr un W k
n�.a:trrn,rtaxW ^.xvv. RM1W,s Vrc4 fmhr't.
wrrn Creay. RV�ona iaA Dbvlrr Ilan YI.
Hr_r. CTaev WRYS.V TM Nnsrn Ws„ 1
4
Attachment B: Regional Trail Master Plan Guidelines and Style Example
Map 1: Location of the Twin Lakes Regional Trail within context of the planned Three Rivers regional trail network.
Elm Creek
Crow River Connector
Regional Trail ,
Mississippi River
Regional Trail
Rush Creek frryiC'.ek
far. Rpsn Park Reaene
Regional Trail
Coon Rapid,
Lake Independence oert1 R"—
Regional Trail Park
Shingle Creek
, 4 a
Regional Trail
Medicine Lake Crystal Lake
Sarah Creek Regional Trail Regional Trail Mississippi River
Regional Trail" Regional Trail
F,.4
Elm Creek ' Rryl <.nx Pwk
Regional Trail rl«a, ml- P ,
Lnke Re"aeoca -
Pant Resorie Rr P
Eagle 1. akn
Repmrsal Pa!k
Y. Lijce Line
2
S�WC•• p�cial
Twin Lakes Rraie a:�m
_.. :..::., cirooe r—n " Trail_° €....,.
n - ,:. Rop•onal Park « , 3" <
Luce Line Silverwo
Maple Plain k.`akrr Regional Trail - Connec r
Connector P a' ka `s 61 ' 0 Dakota Rail Diago
Regional Trail rail
Extension -
Bassett Creek
CP Rail ,
Regional Trail"'
North Cedar Lake
+aarocs Regional Trail ? -
CR 19
pen Rereazan s.
Connector
i
Dakota Rail Bryant Lake RP Cedar Lake LRT
I Regional Trail Connector Regional Trail
v
�,.. e• , " K F icl'ca Canta -
Ca ,irk CR Yol
Teearver Rime Trail &Pant lake
County Reg'"" Park
Regions(
Trail $yet,..Y' +Y Lake Minnetonka LRT Nine Mile Creek
Lake Waconia Regional Trail Regional Trail
Connector Progressive
Rail
Minnesota River Bluffs LRT ,
Regional Trail Rwanaeas n�dew� CP Rail To Dakota
lases Park Rest +e - County
Regional
' Old Cedar. Trail System
Avenue
Regional Trail N
0 2 4 6 8 a 4.--
h9iles
Existing, Planned, and Proposed Regional Trails
TRPD Planned and Existing Regional Trails
TRPD Proposed Regional Trails
- Other Implementing Agency: Existing or Planned Regional Trails
5
Attachment B: Regional Trail Master Plan Guidelines and Style Example
Map 2: Location of the existing portion of Twin Lakes Regional Trail*
a
Y�, ''� .• 'sit X e '.
# f
�:
+� fz `
yv k F
u, u
* includes segment of trail to be constructed along Bass Lake Rd /County Road 10 in 2010.
6
Attachment C: Typical Regional Trail Cross Section
TRAIL NOTES:
1. TOPSOIL AT 6" MIN. DEPTH. SEED
WITH MnDOT SEED MIX 250.
2. 2' WIDTH AT MAX. 2% SLOPE ON
SHOULDER.
3. DRAIN TILE 20' LENGTHS AT LOW
POINTS.
4. 3:1 MAXIMUM SLOPE (H:V)
OUTSIDE OF TSHOULDER.
P
5. MIN. 3'CLEARANCE FROM
Q—�
TREES OR OTHER OBSTRUCTION.
. ry-, � �' � .� I r,
MAINTAIN 10' CLEAR ZONE
ABOVE TRAIL. TRIM TREE
BRANCHES ACCORDINGLY.
VARIES
3' MIN
---- 3 WN T-O"
MIN. X-0
S
T
ROADWAY
4" BROKEN LINE (3 S'TRII 9SF
YELLOW LATEX
3" TYPE LVWE 45030B BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
6 CL. 5 AGGREGATE BASE
1007. CRUSHED (MnDOT 3138)
f
12" SCARIFY, DRY, AND RECOMPACT
SUBGRADE MATERIAL
6" TOPSOIL, TYP.
TYPICAL TRAIL SECTION 10' URBAN W1 BOULEVARD
NTS
J p 1
Fa
DATE REVjc-;j0N TRL
7reeRivers TYPICAL TRAIL SECTION
PARK DISTIUCr TO' URBAN W1 BOULEVARD
rFIARTMEP47 UPLANNMG AND rF\,'Fi OPMENT STANDARD DETAIL PLATE
30 Xenlum Lane North
Plymouth, MN 55441 Fax 763-557-5248
7200 Hemlock Lane
February 23, 2010 Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55369
763.424.5505 main
Mr. Gary Eitel 763.424.5822 fax
Business & Development Director loucksassociates.com
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Re: Trail Planning Services — 53' Avenue Corridor
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
Loucks Proposal No. PI 0026.00
Mr. Eitel:
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal for trail planning along 53` Avenue North between
Humboldt & Bryant Avenues. The attached scope of work is based on our understanding of the project from
your prior conversations with Jared Andrews and our recent meeting regarding this project.
Loucks Associates has completed a variety of trail planning projects for municipal clients. Our principal
landscape architect, Paul Kangas, served as the park planner for the City of Maple Grove prior to starting the
landscape architecture department for Loucks Associates in 2000. We are aware of the issues related to
municipal trail planning and look forward to assisting you with this project. Some examples of our previous
work experience include:
Rush Creek Linear Park:
As a rapidly growing community, Maple Grove needed to further identify linear open space
opportunities within the undeveloped portion of the community. Already known for an
expansive public trail system, the City wanted to plan for future development adjacent to
one of the City's last significant natural resources — Rush Creek. Complicated by major
wetland complexes, Interstate 94, and multiple property owners, the linear park options
were explored and the resulting master plan is being used to guide future land acquisitions
and local connections to this valuable open -space amenity.
Civic Campus Master Plan
The Maple Grove Civic Campus was formed with the addition of a new Public Services
Building adjacent to the Community Center. The resulting site was a natural location for a
community park that includes the only lighted, year -round maintained trail system in the
City. Additional development was master planned including a community picnic structure,
botanical gardens, outdoor performance venue, winter recreation areas, and private
development opportunities.
Rice Lake Loop Trail
The most widely used trail system in Maple Grove, the Rice Lake Loop Trail was in need of
updating after almost twenty years of heavy use. New standards for signage, accessibility,
safety, and minor routing changes were implemented.
planning • civil engineering • land surveying • landscape architecture • environmental
Mr. Gary Eitel February 23, 2010
City of Brooklyn Center Page 2
C. ASSUMPTIONS
1. The City will provide Loucks Associates with necessary base mapping for the project in
electronic format (GIS or AutoCAD) at no cost.
2. We will use information acquired from the City's GIS system as our base map for the planning
effort. If the project moves forward towards implementation, a survey of the existing site
conditions may be necessary.
3. The primary point of contact for the City of Brooklyn Center will be Gary Eitel — Business
Development Director. Additional coordination with other City staff may be required
depending on the final project scope.
4. The City and public records will be our primary sources of information about the current status
of any affected parcels. The scope of this project does not allow for detailed research into the
unique situations affecting each parcel..
D. SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work for this proposal is as follows:
1. PROJECT INITIATION:
To understand the opportunities and constraints of this project, we will need to compile
adequate base mapping and existing conditions data. We anticipate much of this information
will be acquired from the GIS system data available from the City. If surveys, as -built drawings,
or other data is known, and available, we assume the City will provide that to us prior to
beginning our efforts. We will complete the following:
a. Base map research & preparation
b. We will attend a meeting with City Staff to review the project and identify key elements
of the planning process. Key decisions and information to be discussed at this meeting
includes:
i. Project timeline
ii. Available land parcels & project area
iii. Project budget
iv. Phasing considerations
2. SITE WALK WITH CITY STAFF
We will schedule a meeting to walk the project area with City Staff to verity existing conditions
and be able to discuss the potential trail routing and improvements while in the field. We will
take photos to document the site conditions as well ad potential opportunities and constraints of
the project area.
3. CONCEPT DESIGN:
Once we have analyzed the project area and project goals, we will begin preparing conceptual
design options illustrating potential trail routes and opportunities for enhancing the corridor.
We anticipate this will be a joint effort with City Staff and we will attend one meeting with Gary
Eitel where we will explore conceptual options and quickly brainstorm options to be further
refined. We will illustrate the following:
a. Trail alignment
b. Parcels required and effect on remaining parcels
c. Trail amenities (lighting, benches, signage, etc)
d. Potential landscape improvements
4. RENDERED SITE PLAN
We will prepare a rendered concept plan of the preferred option for the City's use in obtaining
funding for the project.
Mr. Gary Eitel February 23, 2010
City of Brooklyn Center Page 3
E. COMPENSATION
WORK EFFORT_
1. PROJECT INITIATION $1,500
2. SITE WALK WITH CITY STAFF 500
3. CONCEPT PLANS 2,000
4. RENDERED EXHIBIT OF PREFERRED DESIGN 500
FEE TOTAL $4,500
1. Compensation is based on the hourly rates listed on the attached Loucks Associates Rate
Schedule. Additional work effort, requested by the City, will be billed per the rates listed.
2. Reimbursable expenses (blueprints, mileage, delivery service, etc.) shall be billed at the rates
listed on the attached Loucks Associates Rate Schedule.
3. Invoices will be sent once a month based on the percentage of work completed and /or
additional services performed through the date of billing. Payments on invoices are due within
30 days of the invoice date. Late payments will be charged interest at a rate of I% per month.
F. CLOSURE
Loucks Associates considers this document a contract for the work described below. As such, if
there are any items that do not meet your needs, please let us know and we will make the necessary
adjustments.
Loucks Associates appreciates the opportunity to present this proposal to you. It is being presented
in duplicate in order that, if it is acceptable to you, one copy may be retained for your records and
one copy may be signed and returned to us as written authorization to proceed.
Attached to this proposal are Loucks Associates General Conditions and Hourly Rate Fee Schedule,
which are part of this agreement. By signing this contract, you are agreeing that they have been
read, understood, and accepted.
We would appreciate the opportunity to personally discuss this proposal /contract with you at your
earliest convenience. Please call us if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
LOUCKS ASSOCIATES, INC.
Paui Kangas A fired Andrews — AICP
Principal Landscape Ar hi4ct Senior Planner
Encl. Loucks Associa Inc. Hourly Rate Fee Schedule
Loucks Associates, Inc. General Conditions
ACCEPTANCE BY:
By: - Date: - - -- - — -
Gary Eitel - City of Brooklyn Center
Loucks Associates is an Equal Opportunity Employoer