HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996 12-16 EDAP Regular Session • EDA AGENDA
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
December 16, 1996
7 p.m.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda
-The following item is considered to be routine by the Economic Development Authority
and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of this item unless
a Commissioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent
agenda and considered at the end of Commission Consideration Items.
a. Approval of Minutes
- Commissioners not present at meetings will be recorded as abstaining from the vote
on the minutes.
1. November 25, 1996 - Regular Session
4. Public Hearing
• a. Resolution Authorizing the Sale of Excess Highway Right of Way
-This conveyance relates to turnback property located adjacent to 6337 Dupont
Avenue North. A resolution setting public hearing date was passed November 12,
1996, and the public hearing was tabled on November 25, 1996, to December 16,
1996.
-Requested Commission Action:
-Open the public hearing.
-Take public input.
-Close the public hearing.
- Motion to adopt resolution.
5. Commission Consideration Items
a. Resolution Authorizing Acquisition, Establishing Offer of Just Compensation,
Authorizing Negotiation and Execution of Purchase Agreement and Authorizing
Payment for Acquisition and Closing Costs for Various Properties Located in the
53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project
-Requested Commission Action:
- Motion to adopt resolution.
•
• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- December 16, 1996
b. Resolution Approving Form of Occupancy Agreement for 53rd Avenue Development
and Linkage Project and Approving Schedule of Values for Various Salvage Items
from the Properties in the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project
- Requested Commission Action:
- Motion to adopt resolution.
C. Resolution Approving Modifications No. 1 and No. 2 to the Tax Increment
Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 and Requesting the
Approval of the City Council
- Requested Commission Action:
- Motion to adopt resolution.
d. Resolution Awarding Contract for Carpet Replacement at the Earle Brown Heritage
Center
- Requested Commission Action:
- Motion to adopt resolution.
e. Resolution Approving the Final Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority
Budget for the Year 1997 Pursuant to MSA Chapter 469.107, Subdivision 1
Requested Commission Action:
• - Motion to adopt resolution.
f. Resolution Requesting the City of Brooklyn Center to Levy Taxes for the Benefit
of the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority for the Year 1997
- Requested Commission Action:
- Motion to adopt resolution.
6. Adjournment
City of Brooklyn Center
A great place to start. A great place to stay.
•
To: Mayor Kragness and Council Members Carmody, Hilstrom, Mann, and Nichols
From: Michael J. McCauley
City Manager
i
Date: December 12, 1996
Re: Budget Document
Attached please find revised sheets for the budget book. Included in the sheets are an
organizational chart and a listing of all full -time positions. These will be included in the final
document. The other sheets changes re resent to reflect ex anded/corrected narratives and utility
P p
and capital numbers that reflect the authorized projects.
The police narratives make the following changes, without changing the dollars allocated in the
budget sheets themselves:
417 Investigation. The narrative includes the captain, trainee and property room
supervisor and the capital outlay includes the printer for the computers contained in the
total budgeted amount.
418 Support Services. The narrative has moved computer aided dispatch equipment to
#4271 minor equipment (where the funds are in the budget sheets) from the capital
portion of the narrative. The narrative is corrected to reflect 6 dispatchers and that the
data entry position is part time (.5) rather than full time.
419 Office of the Chief. The narrative has been clarified to reflect that the computer
acquisition number is the total cost.
The Public Services narratives have been clarified as follows:
i
443 Engineering Services. Redundant language was removed from the profile.
465 Community Center. The capital outlay description has been enhanced.
Budget sheets for Capital Outlay (630) have been revised to reflect the final totals for the
approved projects as set forth in the narratives. Budget sheets for MSA Funds (63 1) have been
reduced slightly to reflect the final estimate.
The utility sheets have been revised to reflect the previously authorized projects and rates
6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 • City Hall & TDD Number (612) 569 -3300
Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number (612) 569 -3400 • FAX (612) 569 -3494
An Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunities Employer
pursuant to the rate study. The budget sheets were prepared prior to the final rate study and
determination of projects. The final numbers also reflect the subsequent increase in charges from
the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. The initial budget sheets did not include the
full cost of construction projects in the water and storm sewer funds and all funds have been
adjusted to reflect the rate study.
City of Brooklyn Center
A great place to start. A great place to stay.
To: Mayor Kragness and Council Members Carmody, Hilstrom, Mann, and Nichols
From: Michael J. McCauley
City Manager
Date: December 12, 1996
Re: Budget
OVERALL BUDGET
On September 9th, the City Council adopted the preliminary 1997 budget and preliminary levy.
Since the adoption of the preliminary General Fund Budget, additional revenues have been
identified from recreation fee increases, primarily for adult recreation and swimming lessons.
Additional reductions in expenditures have been achieved to provide funds for capital projects in
1997 and subsequent budget years.
The proposed levy would increase the real estate taxes levied by the City, Economic Development
Authority and Housing and Redevelopment Authority by a total of 3.87% above the gross levy
for 1996:
• 6 1997 Change
HRA 123,336 124,927 1,591
EDA 177,220 179,124 1,904
General Fund( &debt) 6,194,650 6,442,436 247 7
TOTAL TAX LEVY: 6,495,206 6,746,487 $251,281 (3.9%)
Debt Service requirements will increase in 1997 due to the issuance of special assessment bonds
including general obligation of the City for 1996 street projects. The gross levy for debt service
in the proposed budget is:
199 1997
1994 Bonds 69,035 67,830
1995 Bonds 69,988 68,578
1996 Bonds 0 114,907 Difference
TOTAL: $139,023 $251,315 $112,292
The gross levy for debt service is $20,875 greater than the actual debt service. The City is
required under the terms of the bonds to levy a gross levy at this higher level to cover unpaid
taxes (delinquencies) and contingencies.
® 1
6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 • City Hall & TDD Number (612) 569 -3300
Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number (612) 569 -3400 • FAX (612) 569 -3494
An Afrmative Action /Equal Opportunities Employer
• The 1997 budget involves several changes in presentation and substance. The budget is being
developed on the premise that bonds will not be issued in 1997 for street projects or in the future,
where such projects represent a continuing replacement effort, as opposed to buildings or other
major capital projects that are not an annual effort. (If bonds were issued for the City's share of
the 1997 street projects, an additional $198,000 in costs would be incurred for interest and
issuance costs over the life of the bonds.) The 1997 proposed budget has all city General Fund
and Debt Service real estate taxes in the general fund with a corresponding transfer out for the
payment of the city's portion of debt service. This allows for a clearer picture of the total city real
estate tax levy. The real estate taxes levied by the separate legal entities of the HRA and EDA will
continue to be set forth in their respective budgets. The impact of including the entire city levy
in the general fund is to add $139,023 to the total general fund budget in 1997 that was only
shown in the budgets for the Special Assessment Bonds of 94 and the Special Assessment Bonds
of 95 in the 1996 budget.
The budget provides for 158 full time positions in all funds. This represents a stable number of
full time employees. With two exceptions, all full time employees are assigned in the budget to
one division for payroll purposes. This represents a shift from the previous budget allocation that
had small fractions of full time employees distributed across a number of divisions. The budget
reflects a 3 % increase in wages, with the exception of members of the Teamsters Union. The
Teamsters negotiated a multi -year contract that provides a 3.2% increase in 1997. The personnel
budget also includes step adjustments. Administrative service charges are at approximately
• $399,000, allocating personnel costs from the General Fund to various enterprise funds for
management, engineering, and financial services. An additional $300,000 is budgeted for
engineering reimbursement for construction project work charged against construction projects.
Both the administrative service charges and engineering reimbursement are at roughly the same
level as the 1996 budget. The difference in presentation is that this reimbursement and
administrative service charge is set forth in a separate division (474 Reimbursement from other
Funds), rather than as a contra charge within the various departments. The goal of this
presentation shift is to more easily understand the personnel costs in each department and the
charging out of services.
Overview of General Fund.
As indicated, the overall increase in revenues, adjusted to compare 1997 in similar terms to 1996
is approximately 3 % or $358,070. Revenue increase also reflects the revenues raised to service
the 1996 street improvement bond debt. As compared to the 1996 budget, there are significant
decreases in revenues from licenses and permits and miscellaneous taxes are projected at this time.
The lodging tax decrease results in a number closer to the actual receipts in 1995 and 1994 and
thus represents a downward estimate from a large increase in the 1996 budget over the 1995
actual. Roughly half the receipts from lodging tax are required to be sent to the Convention and
Visitors Bureau, so the impact on the General Fund is not significant. Some of the other
decreases also appear to indicate revenues levels more similar to 1995 numbers based on estimates
2
• by the police and inspection departments from their respective areas. The proposed budget
contains anticipated increases in adult recreation fees and swimming program fees. Aid from the
State of Minnesota is up $124,469 over 1996 or 3.9 %.
The 1997 budget is developing funding for infrastructure replacement work. The proposed budget,
less monies that will be earmarked for infrastructure and debt service, actually keeps overall
budgeted expenditures at the 1996 budget level:
1997 Budgeted Expenditures: $12,125,987
Less Construction transfer 394,197 (code 4727)
Debt Service 251.315
1997 in 1996 terms: $11,480,475
1996 Budgeted Expenditures: $11,632,894
The proposed budget contains a contingency of $50,000. Additional contingency exists within the
budget in the form of salary. The sum projected salary of all employees exceeds actual experience
each year due to vacancies in positions in the normal course of the year. Providing a modest
contingency provides the council with flexibility in responding to unanticipated requests, needs,
and opportunities. It also provides some coverage for unanticipated impacts such as heavier or
more frequent snow /ice removal that may exceed budgeting based on average expectations. Some
revenues in the General Fund budget are also subject to influences beyond the City's control, such
• as building activity (building permits), court fines (judicial discretion), and sales of merchandise.
The General Fund Budget process for 1997 involves converting to a new system from the multiple
departments containing fractional employees to a more unified division format. The goals of the
new format are to make the document relevant and useful by serving as a plan for the expenditure
of money so as to provide municipal services. The transition to a new format means that many
of the current year's budget and actual numbers do not correspond to the 1997 budget categories
or assignments. This transition is complex and is still in progress. The Finance Department has
worked, as much as has been possible, to have the 1996 actual expenditures converted to the 1997
categories to allow comparisons of actual 1996 to the 1997 budget. The Finance Department's
goal is to have the 1996 actual numbers fully converted at year end 1996 for purposes of the 1998
budget. This new format has eliminated taking the Logis sheets and putting them on Excel
spreadsheets to develop the actual budget document.
The new format, as indicated previously, has all City levied real estate taxes placed in the General
Fund budget. Previously, these revenues were split between the General Fund and the Special
Assessment Bond Funds for the 1994 and 1995 bonds. (This was the revenue needed for the City's
share of the debt service.) The 1997 proposed budget transfers funds from the General Fund for
debt service. The impact on the 1997 General Fund budget is to increase the budget by $135,023
without actually increasing the actual amount of taxes or net expenditures by that same amount.
• A new category has been established for civic events, such as Earle Brown Days, to capture costs
of civic events. This process will continue in 1997 to identify and to remove costs from
3
• recreation/community center etc. and place them in this category to more clearly identify those
costs.
The budget does not include the issuance of general obligation bonds for 1997 street projects as
in the previous 3 years, the debt service of which is supported by real estate taxes. Regularly
planned street projects in 1997 are funded, for the City's portion, through funds raised in the year
of construction rather than bonds. Tax revenues approaching $252,000 are needed to service the
debt on 1994, 1995, and anticipated 1996 street project bonds for the city's portion. Bonds would
continue to be issued to cover the assessed portion of street projects unless they could be internally
funded with a higher return from resident assessment payments for the City than competing
investments would give the City on investments.
Specific changes /issues in the proposed budget:
COUNCIL
The annual audit and all commission related expenses have been combined in the City Council
budget. The amount of money included for conferences and training would allow for a facilitated
council retreat and the implementation of the proposed council policy on training to expand the
opportunities for council training. The proposed council policy would allow each council member
to attend state conferences such as the League of Minnesota Cities Annual conference and would
provide for the Mayor and 2 council members on a rotating basis to attend 1 national conference.
• CITY COUNCIL GOALS
The City Council established several goals for 1997. Those goals are reflected in the proposed
budget narrative. Some specific ways the budget supports those goals is as follows:
Goal 1. Complete comprehensive plan and associated zoning ordinances to support causing
and controlling development.
- The budget provides the personnel to participate in the planning process and its
implementation. Funds from 1996 will be used to cover the cost of the comprehensive plan
update.
Goal 2. Initiate community vision and actions to attain that vision. The objective of this
goal is to sustain the code enforcement program, meet with residents of "targeted"
neighborhoods regarding development plans, as well as establish a community-wide vision
for the future of Brooklyn Center.
- The budget contains monies for council visioning process with a facilitator, as well as
funds to support training for the City Council and Staff. The personnel who conduct the
code enforcement activities are included in the budget: police, inspectors, prosecutor, and
support personnel
• Goal 3. Make visible the positive aspects and accomplishments of Brooklyn Center as a
community while maintaining the momentum on code enforcement and continue to reach
4
• out to community organizations.
- In addition to the items mentioned with reference to Goal 2, the budget contains funds
for a community service officer in the police department (using existing personnel),
participation in the Association of Rental Managers, and 6 rather than 4 newsletters per
year.
Goal 4. Establish a community-based information service and invite positive action by
citizens that will generate citizen support for Council and administration of the City and
identify options to the City for the achievement of this goal, and in 1997 begin to
implement approved options.
- The budgetary support for this goal lies in the Comprehensive Plan work and items
identified above.
Goal 5. Remove infrastructure impediments to the redevelopment of Brookdale, research
funding sources, and continue discussion with Minneapolis.
- Budgetary support lies in personnel levels and general protection (by not spending) the
bond proceeds necessary to support a regional pond and other work around Brookdale
when ownership and direction are determined. Also, work in 1996 to adjust the tax
increment basis by removing and reinstating selected properties that have declined in value
• supports the goal by providing a potential tax increment base for development.
Goal 6. Develop a five year financial plan for the City of Brooklyn Center.
- The revamped budget presentation provides the starting point for developing and tracking
financial goals.
Goal 7. Adopt a comprehensive development plan for the City of Brooklyn Center to
address housing, redevelopment, transportation opportunities, etc.
- The budget support is described above for the comprehensive planning process.
Goal. 8. Establish methods to evaluate /assess municipal operations and the benefits derived
from the City's interactions with other entities and associations and determine the cost -
benefit derived for the City.
- The revised format will facilitate this work in the context also of the five year plan
development.
ADMINISTRATION
Administration has been reconfigured to create separate divisions for human resources and city
• clerk. No replacement of the communications specialist position is included, but an intern position
is included at slightly '/z the cost of the previous communications position.
5
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
• The MIS department's capital monies are now allocated primarily for system equipment.
Individual computer equipment has generally been allocated within individual departments to more
fully state the true cost of individual departmental operations to include their cost of computer
equipment used exclusively within a department.
POLICE
The police department requested 3 additional staff positions: a full time investigator, a full time
dispatcher, and a part-time civilian aid. The proposed budget does not include any of those
positions, but does include a pay differential to take an existing patrol position and rotate it
through investigation. The goal is to use existing personnel more efficiently and to assess the
impact of MDT's on efficiency. The costs of the canine unit will be separated in the narratives,
but not set out in a separate division.
FIRE
The Fire Chief requested compensation for drill, training, equipment maintenance to remain
competitive with surrounding jurisdictions. The proposed budget includes the drill compensation
of $35,00, but not the other components. The useful life of expensive fire apparatus has been
P P PP
increased to make the equipment replacement charges more manageable.
CENTRAL GARAGE
While not part of the General Fund, the Central Garage charges have a profound impact on the
• General Fund. When the Central Garage was instituted, the full replacement of equipment was
not funded since charges for depreciation had not accumulated for equipment being replaced prior
to full accumulation of depreciation charges necessary for replacement. The goal is to have
replacement fully funded in order to fully implement the central garage concept. As part of the
implementation, several changes are incorporated into the General Fund budget:
1) interest earned in the fund has been spread out against the individual pieces of
equipment
2) items having a value below $5,000 have been removed from the central garage fund
replacement schedule (items below $5,000 for garage use, as opposed to other
departments, will still be budgeted, but not on a depreciation schedule)
3) police vehicles will be sold rather than recycled in the fleet; this will reduce the cost of
squads to the police by giving them credit for the sale proceeds and eliminating charges
previously levied against them to refurbish squads for use in the fleet; maintenance costs
and fuel costs for other divisions should decrease;
4) departments will acquire new or slightly used vehicles on their depreciation schedule;
this will, as indicated, reduce their costs for maintenance, give them better equipment and
allow them to keep equipment longer; the anticipated impact of this change is to reduce
• the overall cost of vehicles used by the police and other departments
6
• 5) certain pieces of equipment are being frozen or eliminated from the replacement
funding; this includes:
a) police are trading a 4X4 and a car for a new 4X4
b) the police mobile command vehicle has been funded at a non - motorized
replacement over a much longer life and the balance of accumulated funds has been
spread to other police vehicles;
c) used equipment will be purchased to replace the grader and two loaders, greatly
reducing the amount needed for depreciation, replacement
d) 1/4 ton truck replacement where appropriate for 1 to 2 vehicles, reducing cost
e) eliminate replacement of $18,000 van to pull puppet wagon; this will cause shift
in method upon retirement of vehicle in the future: use existing, fully used vehicle
to tow it on a different schedule; it did not seem reasonable to have such a high
overhead for a seasonal activity when other means of moving could be developed
or a different schedule used
f) the concession trailer and the band shell were removed from the depreciation
schedule: this would be consistent with requiring a re- evaluation of these activities
i and keeping the depreciation for ongoing equipment replacement
BUILDINGS
The recommended budget starts a process of reducing annual plantings in favor of perennial plants
and the use of existing staff rather than contractual. The requested wading pool refurbishing has
been removed from the proposed budget at the City Council's direction to have that issue studied
in connection with the overall building plans for City Hall, police, and Community Center.
PARKS
The recommended budget eliminates a request for new hockey lights ($16,000) at Willow Lane.
If there are savings within the program itself, then lights might be a possibility, but the
recommended budget does not recommend an increase for the lights. There is also a minor
reduction in part-time hours. Special assessment charges for the Orchard Lane East Project
adjacent to Cahlander Park are included in the 1997 budget as a one time payment of the entire
specially assessed amount for the street work. (Code 449 -4531 $17,000)
RECREATION
Recreation will require a great deal of analysis in the five year planning process to envision where
the Council and community wish to place resources. The recommended budget will start the
process by increasing the fees for adult recreation to accomplish two things: cover the marginal
costs of activities and make a contribution to the cost of overhead (staff scheduling) for these
programs. The target is a $40,000 net increase in revenues from adult recreation using a $54,000
gross increase in charges. Senior recreation is not included in these targets since it consists of
7
general recreation activities with few marginal costs. Specifics would include raising basketball
and broomball from $48-49 a er person to $60.00 per person. Softball teams would
P P P P PY an
additional $75.00 per team for residents and $85.00 per team for non - residents. Exercise and
other classes would be priced to generate $10.00 per person overhead contributions. Pottery
would go from $48.00 to $70.00 to capture the cost of utilities, instructors and overhead. The
flexible target will allow changes due to market response to fee increases. The Dudley tournament
will have a goal of covering marginal costs through fee and admission increases.
COMMUNITY CENTER
Slight reductions in the requested budget have been recommended to encourage a process of
seeking more efficient and cost effective use of printing and postage and part-time help.
Entertainment in the park has been reduced approximately 20 % in the recommendation and the
director is seeking sponsors to cover this reduction. The sale of items will be studied as part of
the planning process to see if it is effective.
POOL
Swimming lesson fees have been increased slightly to generate more revenue and to be
competitive with fees charged by neighboring programs. Part-time monies are recommended
reduced to reflect the need to examine hours of operation and usage.
YOUTH
Youth programs contain no monies for payments to support outside organizations. Those requests
• are in social services for the Council to review.
SOCIAL SERVICE
Social Service /Joint Powers is included in the proposed budget at the 1996 level of funding plus
4 %. The City Council's allocation of funding is set forth in the narrative sheet for the social
service activities. ( #435, Social Services)
EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER
The Heritage Center operations have been established in the proposed budget to provide for an
Administration division to capture the overall administrative costs. Previously the cost of
administrative personnel were spread out amongst the individual operations such as the Inn and
Convention Center. The substantive changes in the allocation of monies for the Heritage Center
will cause the implementation of recommendations made by the Marquette study to focus
marketing on the target conference users with personal promotion and to reduce expenditures at
the Inn. Specifically, monies have been increased for trade show attendance to promote sales to
the conference users most likely to use the core business at the facility: conferences. The
Marquette study indicated that the Inn would not be able to cash flow its operations under a
municipal staffing configuration and that marketing would not overcome that deficit. Thus, the
ro osed budget allocates re
P P g sources sufficient for AAA membership in order to have the Inn listed
in the AAA travel directory, which is a substantial source of business, and a limited amount of
additional advertising. This will result in targeted advertising and a reduction in overhead
expenses such as ads in bed and breakfast magazines. The level of funding for promotional
8
materials has been reduced to scale back from 4 color to one color for the Inn's promotional
brochure. In the conference area, while funds have been increased for direct marketing at trade
shows etc., monies have been reduced for advertising agency work. There is a modest sum left
in the budget for assistance in advertising material design from a professional agency.
Rates will be increased at the Inn to increase revenues. Overdue capital expenditures will be made
for carpeting replacement. The budget projects a carry over in the fund balance of $50,000 from
1996 operating surplus to cover most of the capital expenditures in the 1997 budget. These monies
will cover the cost of capital improvements to the extent that operations do not generate sufficient
resources for these capital expenditures and operations in 1997. As indicated in the chart on page
10 of this letter, the budget projects a slight decrease in cash balances due to the capital
expenditures. But, the projection of a cash balance going forward into 1997 will cover the actual
expenditures. The target for the Center is to cash flow its own operations. While previous budgets
have made that projection, the year to date results of operations for 1996 indicate a strong
likelihood of having operating costs covered by operating revenues as of the end of September.
The rate of advance bookings for 1997 is also roughly $100,000 ahead of advance bookings at this
time last year. One of the other goals for 1997 is to replace the tenancy at the D barn which will
expire in the Spring of 1997.
WATER, SEWER AND STORM SEWER FUNDS
The budget presentation has been changed to budget for capital expenditures from these funds for
their portions of construction projects. These expenditures were made in the past as authorized
in connection with projects, but not set forth in the budget document. Modest increases in rates
have been approved by the City Council to maintain the fiscal health of these funds. These funds
are addressing future capital needs such as water tower painting, replacement of water lines,
replacement of sanitary sewer lines and storm sewer work. These budgets do not include monies
for the proposed Shingle Creek Regional Pond as a joint project with Minneapolis to deal with
drainage issues in the Brookdale area and north Minneapolis. If that project goes forward, tax
increment bond proceeds (from already issued bonds) would be used as the primary source of
funding if assistance from the State is not received.
OTHER ENTERPRISES
The liquor and golf operations are projected to operate similar to 1996. Golf is projected to cash
flow its operations and interest payments. Year to date results for 1996 in golf indicate a strong
likelihood of succeeding in meeting that goal. The liquor operations are projected to increase their
fund balance slightly and contribute $100,000 to the General Fund. Issues of store location will
have to be resolved in the early part of 1997.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
The budget would slightly increase the Capital Fund Balance with identified projects. Year end
1996 is anticipated to provide funding to the Capital Fund and the Special Assessment
Construction Fund so that the City's share of the Orchard West project is paid in 1997.
• Unresolved is the need to provide adequate and legally correct space for police /jail operations.
Construction to resolve those issues would impact the fund balance in the Capital Improvement
9
• Fund and the City's debt assuming a bond issue to address the needs of the fire department for
adequate space that complies with applicable safety codes. The issue is unresolved at this time
awaiting final development of plans for construction and the decision of the voters on the issuance
of bonds in 1997 for a portion of these construction projects.
IMPACTS ON CASH BALANCES
The following table illustrates approximate impacts on cash balances as a result of the proposed
budget. As indicated in the table, the water and sewer funds project a negative impact on cash
balances. This is the result of major capital work in both funds. In the Water Fund, the Orchard
West project (neighborhood street improvements) and painting tower #2 are major uses of funds.
The approximate impact on cash will reduce an approximate $3.6 Million balance at year end
1996 to $2.7 Million at year end 1997 in the Water Fund. As indicated in the rate study presented
to the City Council in connection with rate setting for 1997, the projected cash balance should
level at approximately $1.5 Million in 1999 and 2000. In the Sewer Fund, the slight negative
projected 1997 impact on cash will not impact overall balances as they are projected to increase
through the year 2000 as expenditures for capital projects go forward at an annual expenditure
level lower than in 1996 when Lift Station #1 and a force main were replaced along with
substantial work in connection with the neighborhood street projects.
IBu dg e ted Impacts on Cash Balances of Selected Major Funds:
Fund
G eneral HRA EDA Ca pital Improvements
Revenue $12,125,987 $139,483 $694,204 $336,436
Expenditures $12,125,987 $139,483 $3,324,989 $298,753
$0 $0 ($2,630,785) $37,683
Fund: Water Sanitary Sewer Storm Central Garage
Revenue $1,393,774 $2,430,912 $1,237,669 $1,794,076
Expenditures $2,472,549 $2,599,779 $1,386,372 $1,794,076
Depreciation $222,000 $132,000 $57,000 $0
($856,775) ($36,867) ($91,703)
Fund: Liquor Golf T.I. F Dist. #3 MSA Construction Fund
Revenue $2,868,100 $329,535 $281,416 $653,000
Expenditures $2,829,881 $321,606 $260,000 $553,000
$38,219 $7,929 $21,416 $100,000
Fund: E. B. Farm Tax Incr Special Assessment Construction
Revenue $1,412,981 $4,025,500
Expenditures $1,242,000 $4,025,500
$170,981 $0
Fund: EBHC X *E.B.H.C. anticipates carry over of $50,000 in 1996 operating surplus
Revenue $2,665,208 for capital expenditures. Thus, budget projects negative impact on
Expenditures $2,668,648 cash balance, but there is anticipated cash balance from 1996 to 1997.
($3,440)
10
• SUMMARY
The proposed budget implements a return to a format that states expenditures in a fashion that is
easier to track, places all general fund tax revenues in the General Fund, allocates most full -time
employees as full persons within departments, reduces the number of divisions greatly, uses line-
item detail, and provides more information regarding the planned use of monies than the previous
budget. The final transmittal letter will be refined to include additional information as identified
by the City Council and as the graphic display of this information is refined with the final
allocations.
•
11
City of Brooklyn Center Organization
1997
ELECTORATE
- - -- City Council Advisory
Commissions
Administration
— - '- - - Purchasing
Human Resources
City Attorney - - - - - City Manager Elections
Licenses
-_ -- _ City Clerk
Communications
Mgmt. Info. Systems
I
PUBLIC SERVICES FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT L NITY
L SERVICES MENT
Fire Prevention -Patrol
- Engineering - investigation Street Mntce Fire Supression - Emergency Preparedness Crime Prevention g
- Sanitary Sewer - Community Programs g ns
- Central Garage - Support Services ement A
-Gov't Bldgs - - - - - - -- - Dispatch es
-Storm Sewer •Water Dept
-Park Mntce - -- - - -- --
- Recreation Programs
- Community Center
-Golf Course
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
SUMMARY OF FULL TIME EMPLOYEE POSITIONS
RECOMMENDED 1997 BUDGET
DIVISION 1995 1996 1997
Administration 2.5 2.4 2.4
Human Resources /Purchasing 2.0 2.0 2.0
City Clerk 1.0 1.0 1.0
Elections 1.0 1.0 1.0
Finance 8.0 8.0 7.0
Data processing 1.0 1.0 1.0
Patrol 34.0 34.0 34.0
Investigation 9.0 9.0 9.0
Support Services 14.0 14.0 14.0
Office of the Chief 2.0 2.0 2.0
Fire 1.0 1.0 1.0
Inspections 4.0 4.0 4.0
Planning & Zoning 1.0 1.0 2.0
Assessing 4.0 4.0 4.0
Custodial Services 1.0 1.0 1.0
Building Maintenance 1.0 2.0 2.0
Grounds Maintenance 0.0 1.0 1.0
Engineering Services 6.0 6.0 6.0
Public Services Administration 3.0 3.0 3.0
Streets Maintenance 5.0 5.0 5.9
Traffic Control 2.0 2.0 2.0
Snow & Ice Control 3.0 3.0 3.0
Parks Grounds Maintenance 2.0 2.0 2.0
Parks Facilities Maintenance 2.0 3.0 3.0
Maint for Recreation Programs 1.0 1.0 1.0
Forestry 2.0 2.0 2.0
Ice /Hockey Rinks 2.0 2.0 2.0
Recreation Administration 5.0 5.0 5.0
Community Center 2.0 4.0 4.0
Pool 1.0 1.0 1.0
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 122.5 127.4 128.3
Economic Development Authority 2.5 2.6 2.6
Liquor Stores 3.0 3.0 3.0
Centerbrook Golf Course 1.0 1.0 1.0
Earle Brown Heritage Center
Administration 3.0 3.0 3.0
Convention Center 5.8 5.8 5.8
Inn on the Farm 2.2 2.2 2.2
TOTAL E.B.H.C. 11.0 11.0 11.0
Water Utility Fund 4.0 4.0 4.0
Sanitary Sewer Fund 3.0 3.0 3.0
Central Garage Fund 6.0 6.0 5.1
TOTAL FULL TIME EMPLOYEES 153.0 158.0 158.0
Division: Investigation
Budget Code: 417
PROFILE
The investigation activity conducts investigations of reported criminal offenses by examination of crime
scenes, determination of the identity of suspects, processing of evidence, preparing criminal cases for court,
and gathering and evaluating intelligence information that relates to specific criminal activity.
The property/evidence is responsible for the proper receipt, cataloging, storage and disbursement of all
property which comes into the possession of the Brooklyn Center Police Department as found, recovered,
confiscated or evidence.
The investigation activity has two programs:
I. Anoka- Hennepin Narcotics and Violent Crimes Task Force - It is comprised of officers from local law
enforcement agencies who work cooperatively to combat crimes relating to the sale and use of illegal
drugs. Brooklyn Center has one investigator assigned to the Task Force.
2. The School Liaison Program is a cooperative community approach among students, parents, school
personnel and police in an effort to meet community needs. One School Liaison Officer is assigned to
Brooklyn Center High School during the school year.
• DEPARTMENTAL GOALS
• Continue to fully investigate reported crimes, identify the perpetrator, and seek successful prosecution
through state and federal courts.
• Continue inventorying, storing, and returning or disposing of property in the most expedient manner
consistent with the needs of the criminal justice system.
• Continue suppressing illegal drug use in Brooklyn Center and surrounding communities through the
commitment to the Anoka- Hennepin Narcotics and Violent Crimes Task Force by investigating,
apprehending, and convicting violators and seizing illegal drugs.
• Continue working with students, parents, and school personnel through the school liaison program.
• Reactivate proactive initiatives such as surveillance of high crime areas and participation in ad -hoc task
forces to address specific criminal activity. Surveillance details will be conducted when patterns of
specific crimes are detected. Examples are surveillance along the Freeway Boulevard area for thefts
from auto and surveillance at Brookdale to combat retail crimes. Ad -hoc task forces are formed with
other law enforcement agencies to combine resources to investigate an organized group of criminals who
may be involved in forgery, fraud, burglary, or auto theft. Ad -hoc task forces usually involve one
member of the department and last less than one month.
• Increase application of computerized methods in the cataloging and tracking of property.
• Computerize investigation tracking system to allow infra- departmental access to investigation
documentation.
• Reduce the caseload of individual investigators to a manageable level. Currently, each investigator is
assigned between 30-40 active cases. The cases are reported quicker than the individual investigator can
dispose of previously assigned cases. The addition of the investigative trainee will greatly assist in
• achieving this objective.
PERSONNEL LEVELS
Number Position
• The investigation activity consists of.
1 Captain
6 Investigators
1 School Liaison Officer
1 Patrol Officer Investigation Trainee
1 Property Room Supervisor
An investigative trainee on a one -year assignment is anticipated in calendar year 1997.
Five of the investigators and one investigative trainee are assigned to investigate all felony level crimes
ranging from damage to property to homicide. Theft, forgery and fraud account for the greatest number of
cases investigated. The increased sophistication in the area of forgery and fraud has placed greater time
demands on investigators.
One investigator is assigned to the Anoka- Hennepin Narcotics and Violent Crimes Task Force. The value
of the task force has been proven time and again through their success in apprehending and convicting major
drug dealers in the north metropolitan area.
One school liaison officer is assigned to the Brooklyn Center High School to address the unique problems
that students face in the educational setting. Approximately $41,000 of the annual cost of an officer is
reimbursed by the school district.
CAPITAL OUTLAY
Item Anticipated Units Cost(s) Use /need
purchase date each
Laptop computers 1st qtr. 1997 2 $3,714 Research information, process
information at crime scenes.
Inventory tracker, software and bar 1 st qtr. 1997 1 $1,500 Upgrade current equipment.
code reader
1 work station 1 st qtr. 1997 1 $3,300 Investigator use.
8 office chairs 1st qtr. 1997 8 $500 Investigator use.
Laser Printer 1 st qtr. 1997 1 $1,500 Printer for Investigators.
Division: Support Services
Budget Code: 418
PROFILE
The support services activity consists of support personnel for the patrol and investigation activities. The
Communications Center handles 911 service and dispatches police, fire, or ambulance units to calls for
service through the use of a Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) computer system. The records and clerical
activities provide the overall coordination and flow of all paperwork in the police department to include case
work and administrative documentation. The primary function of the records activity is the processing of
police reports and their proper dissemination along with maintaining accurate statistical information and
appropriate reporting procedures as required by the State. Community Service Officers are responsible for
animal control monitoring
g pn ate and commercial property for junk cars and other city violations and
assisting police and
g p fire personnel. Support services activities also include the issuance of liquor licenses,
gambling licenses, pawn shop licenses, handgun permits, and miscellaneous permits as required per state
and city regulations.
DEPARTMENTAL GOALS
• Continue to provide trained professional dispatchers.
• Integrate dispatchers and clerical personnel into the department's Community Oriented Policing
philosophy by involving them in the identification, research, and execution of a plan of action to solve
a roblem within the city while fostering "citizen "
P nn more friendl contact w' police.
tY s with the
g y P
• Design and implement new police report forms utilizing si im nt re
P P p g current word processing are
® P r soflw for uniformity
and to facilitate in the reporting of all necessary information for statistical purposes.
• Continue to work on the computerization of various applications for ease of retrieval and administrative
tracking such as Operation ID assignment, department training records, general orders, licensing,
departmental forms, etc.
• Continue to provide efficient records support which includes the processing and proper dissemination
of all case reports, and coding and classifying all casework for statistical purposes as required by the
State.
• Continue to follow and update where appropriate proper methods and guidelines with regard to records
destruction, records retrieval, and storage.
• Conduct city -wide inspections of residential property to assure compliance with city ordinances.
SPECIFIC EXPENDITURE CODE DETAIL
Object
Number Explanation Amount
4271 Minor Equipment $8pp
Units used for computer aided dispatch to continue service during power surge or outage.
PERSONNEL LEVELS
Number Position
I Sergeant
1 Staff Services Supervisor
6 Public Safety Dispatchers
2.5 Code Enforcement Officers
.50 Cadet
1 Classification Operator
• 2 Police Secretary
1 Receptionist
.50 Data Entry Technician
.90 Records Technician
2.2 Typists
CAPITAL OUTLAY
Item Anticipated Units Cost(s) Use /need
purchase date
21" monitors 2nd qtr. 1997 2 $3,800 Replace 17" monitors currently in
use for dispatch to have multiple
screens displayed.
Security camera system 2nd qtr. 1997 $10,000 Refurbish existing system to have
five working cameras with
recording capabilities (currently
have only three of five cameras
functional).
Division: Office of the Chief of Police
Budget Code: 419
•
PROFILE
The office of the chief of police administers all functions of the police department which includes proper
development of all personnel and resources budgeted. Additionally, the office analyzes crime trends and
adapts and deploys personnel to most efficiently meet the ever changing needs of the city.
DEPARTMENTAL GOALS
• To fully integrate the Community Oriented Policing philosophy into all divisions of the police
department.
• Train personnel to integrate ArcView into the crime analysis functions to give the department more
graphic (visual) information about crime frequency and trends. It is hoped that this would lead to
quicker response to q p crime as well as rovide easier to understand information to the public.
P p
• Continue the city -wide neighborhood code enforcement initiative.
PERSONNEL LEVELS
Number Position
1 Chief of Police
• 1 Administrative Analyst
CAPITAL OUTLAY
Item Anticipated Units Cost(s) Use /need
purchase date Total
Four computer terminals 2nd qtr. 1997 4 $10,000 Replace 386 models throughout
department.
Division: Engineering Services
Budget Code: 443
is PROFILE
This activity provides engineering support services for street reconstruction and other capital improvements,
administration of the city's state aid street system, traffic engineering, mapping, review of proposed
developments and plats, certification of special assessments, and general office and fieldwork services such
as surveying, inspection and public information.
The cost of engineering services related to improvement projects are reimbursed by the funding source(s)
for the respective projects. In the case of improvement projects receiving funding from the General Fund,
this may result in a transfer from the General Fund to the Capital Improvement project and a transfer back
to the General Fund to cover a percentage of the project's engineering costs. This practice will be reviewed
in the five year planning process.
DEPARTMENTAL GOALS
• Collect and process information for proposed street and utility improvements
• Perform design and contract administration for Orchard West and France Avenue street improvement
projects.
• Collect and process information for other city improvement projects.
• Conduct special studies as needed.
• Conduct biennial Municipal State Aid traffic counts for all state aid streets by 10/1/97.
• Review proposed developments and plats.
• Inspect city improvement projects.
PERSONNEL LEVELS
Number Position
1 City Engineer
1 Engineering Technician 4
3 Engineering Technician 3
1 Engineering Secretary
.82 Seasonal Part-Time
• CAPITAL OUTLAY
Item Anticipated Units Cost(s) Use /need
purchase date each
Computer software - Survey LT 1/97 2 $640 Stand alone CAD application that
serves the needs of surveyors and
drafts people.
Computer software - Auto CAD LT 1/97 3 $425 A basic CAD application that is
compatible with our current CAD
system.
PC workstation with 17" monitor 1/97 2 $2,900 Used with the above software for
Il i preparation of street
reconstruction plans and/or other
improvement projects.
•
r
Division: Community Center
Budget Code: 465
® PROFILE
This unit provides for all recreation activities at the Community Center, as well as building maintenance.
The Community Center is used by people of all ages in many different ways. Some use the pool, exercise
room and sauna, while others make use of the arts and crafts room including the pottery room. Others use
Constitution Hall for various types of meetings and programs. Some people enjoy using the game room.
Overall attendance at the Community Center for a year is around 250,000, including persons using the
swimming pool and exercise facility, persons taking swimming lessons and other classes, and visitors to
Constitution Hall.
DEPARTMENTAL GOALS
• Initiate in -depth review of Community Center operations and activities.
• Develop revised schedule of operating hours. Expected expenditure reduction of $17,000.
• Enhance marketing efforts (including a customer service component) to attract additional participants.
1997 goal will be 5% increase.
• Investigate inexpensive changes (i.e. paint, signage) to make the Community Center more appealing.
• Assure that the facility is clean and well maintained so as to compliment marketing efforts.
• SPECIFIC EXPENDITURE CODE DETAIL
Object
Number Explanation Amount
4130 Part -Time Employees $61,000
Includes six building supervisors to provide supervision nights and weekends, staffing the
concession stand during the busiest hours of operation (at other times, clerical or building
supervisor staff cover the concession stand), setup staff for Constitution Hall and other
events, and babysitting staff.
4220 Operating Supplies $20,000
Includes cleaning supplies, building repair, and operating supplies.
4840 Merchandise for Resale $59,880
Examples are swimsuits, goggles, nose plugs, concessions, and exercise equipment.
PERSONNEL LEVELS
Number Position
.50 Aquatics Coordinator (Note: This may be reorganized to a net of .5 between codes 465 and
466.)
4 Custodian
•
CAPITAL OUTLAY
• Item Anticipated Units Cost(s) Use /need
purchase date
Contingency Equipment $5,000 This provides funds to replace
Replacement equipment that breaks down over
the course of the year, such as
exercise equipment.
r
• CITY OF BROOKL*NTER •
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
Object Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
DIV CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 630
4100 WAGES OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES 24,934 46,505 12,638 0 0
4112 OVERTIME OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES 310 1,108 390 0 ( 0
f
4130 WAGES OF PART -TIME EMPLOYEES I 405 I 2,492 15 ( 0 0
SALARIES AND WAGES TOTAL ( 25,649 I 50,104 13,043 0 0
4141 PERA BASIC PLAN 122 470 ( 0 0 0
4142 PERA COORDINATED PLAN 1,082 ( 1,937 584 0 0
4146 FICA 1,779 I 3,382 �. 956 0 I 0
4154 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 502 1,629 153 0 0
FRINGE BENEFITS TOTAL 3,485 7,418 { 1,693 ( 0 0
4210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 73 1 , 0 ` 0 ` 0
4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES I 148 321 21 0 0
4225 SHOP SUPPLIES I 0 2,098 ( 0 0 0
4230 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 0 ( 1,893 0 I 0 0
4233 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 111 0 ( 198 0 0
SUPPLIES TOTAL 259 4,385 219 ( 0 0
4310 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 92,325 ( 42,862 5,550 ) 0 0
CONSULTING TOTAL 92,325 I 42,862 ( 5,550 0 0
4321 POSTAGE 11 I 0 0 0 I 0
4322 TELEPHONE SERVICES ( 0 I 818 I 0 0 ( 0
CITY OF axonxL,m cumzon
m/ovxoon nsCnMo a000ET wonxouuur BY ozvzszom page z
zne7 000suz
19*6 1997 1997
Object code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS or oopr mamaoon
Division code a Description acrnuL ucznaL ouuoor 10/31/96 noOouazoo nocnMmuw000
4324 ooLzvEnY annvzco 26 o zz n o
«asz LEGAL morIcs pnaLzcArzom
1 425 _----_ 0 0
romnnmzcArzomS zoruL 1,136 z.z«« 161 o n
osno noexzn a mxzmzomuwcu cowzaxcr n ouo o n n
�
4382 o0Dzemuwr nopuzR & mxzmrmmuNco n 1,253 . u n n
�
4383 gnzLozmGa nopuzoo n 270 n o o
«zus LxmooCxpzwo ooxvzcno »zo n o o o
ozyz anzLnzwo nowrocs u 9,000 1,000 n n
4397 Looza cxnnouo n
� 215 —__----- 0 0
nsPuzn nowrxL, a nuzmromAwco zosuL szn 11,421 z o o
�
*000 OTHER ComzaAcznuL ooRvzCoa 23,305 6 n n V �
4407 LEGAL FEE FOR curzraL pnoouCT3 9,991 7.342 n o n
�
4408 EmGzmuonzmo poo c&pzzAu enoJ n u«.ozz u u o
««ny aowzm/cLonzcaL FEES ' c�p Pnou p 9ez o*u o n n
.
� ���� .— - --- ..^
4414 Lzcow000 zuxu� a rooa
' ' _-_--_ l 0 _--___-_ 0
oznox comrnmcru8u oonvzcoa TOTAL 44.087 38,810 n o o
� *o«a Mncrr'oao xonnLv CuxoGua 2,561 1^280 0 _0 0
�comraxL sanaGc nomr*L xeToo zorAu z,s*z 1,280 n o o
�
«onz oLoccnzc aEnvzco n zoo �o
� n o
4482 axa aouvzcs | 0 ' 105 ' ' 126 / 0 / 0
• •
CITY OF BROOKL*NTER
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 3
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
Object Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
4487 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 2,986 _ 8 0 0 0
UTILITIES TOTAL 2,986 301 ( 109 0 0
4512 RIGHT OF WAY & EASEMENT COSTS 1,527 0 0 0 0
4520 BUILDINGS 0 20,561 I I 0 0( 0
4550 FURNITURE & FIXTURES 0 51,195 I 0 I 0 i 0
4551 OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 14,868 211,859 78,759 0 0
4560 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 417,056 854,769 I 210,864 210,000 210,000
'APITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL 433,451 1,138,384 ( 289,623 ( 210,000 210,000
4712 E.D.A. FUND 'TRANSFER I 470,000 I 0 I. I 0 0 0
4727 SPECIAL ASSESS CONST TRANSFER i 0 ; 0 ; i 0 i 0 i 173,7
"TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL I 470,000 0 0 0 173,753
"APITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND TOTAL i 1,076,259 i 1,296,208 i i 311,396 210,000 383,753
;.'APITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND TOTAL ( 1,076,259 1,296,208 311,396 210,000 383,753
0 czrx OF BROOK
wemAGon uocoMo oOo6oz nonxauoor BY oIvzoIom
Page 4
1997 e000ar
1yoo zoy7
�e»7
«b1ect c»dc "°�^*
a Description 19*4 zyys Aonproo AS or oopz �un
Division
~�~~ ~~~~ ~~�ou000z~�~ ~~ 1 0/31/96 ~ RE0ouarEn 00000
ozv mou romo o»z
*zoo wxoos OF u000LAu umpunY000 22.769 zn,«zo 21,223 n o
«zzz ovonTzMo or nonnLaa 0meLovooa 1,556 283 1,529 o o
� «zan WAGES OF PART-TIME onpuoY000 941 270 z n o
�
«z»z mvCnzznu or PART-TIME onpuoxoo
47 » u
uxLxnzoo AND wmaoo TOTAL
25,313 zn ooz 24.274 o n �
4141 eonA oAuzc pLxm onn szo n n n
oz*z Poxx connozmxroo PLAN noy 706 1,019 n o �
«z4a Flcx
z.sn« 1.161 z n o
*zS* wonxonS cOmpomaurzn0 ImonRamco
------L ----- 516 0 __0
rnzmoo oD0orzzo TOTAL 3 2'516 3,338 n o �
*220 oponnzzmA oopPLzua zz zG o o n
ozss LownacupzNo mxronzaua o n 61 o n
4236 azwmo a ozzpzmo m8ruuzaLo n o 181 o n
«z«y nrzLzzY axazom Snpp�zoo
n
�
' ---- --------' 1,860 ! 0 0
onreLzoS To�e�
� zz zo 2,102 o o
�
� 4310
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 44.087 253.720 zoz o o
*312 LEGAL SonvIcon n o
� ]u5 o o
�
�
4317 TnsmaLAzun SoRvzcu3 75 »
-------� ------- ------- -____---O
- nwSnorzmG TOTAL **.162 253,730 191.634 V o
CITY OF BROOKLIMEN'PER
•
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 5
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
Object Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
-- -------- -- - - -- - _____________
4324 DELIVERY SERVICE
71 i O i i 57 i O i 0
4334 USE OF PERSONAL AUTO I 0 I 3 I I 0 I 0 I 0
4351 LEGAL NO'T'ICE PUBLICATION ( 822 I 293 � � 420 � 0 � 0
C'OMMUNICAT'IONS TOTAL I 893 I 296 I I 477 I 0 I 0
4382 EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE I i 0 i 470 i 0 i 0
KEPAIR, RENTAL, & MAINTENANCE TOTAL I 0 I 0 I I 470 0 I 0
4400 O'T'HER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES i 1,273 i 336 i i 138,817 I 0 I 0
I (
4407 LEGAL FEE FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS 4,889 4 886
I I o 0 o
I
I
i I
4408 ENGINEERING FEE CAPI'T'AL PROJ I 0 I 1,677 I I 0 I 0 I 0
4409 ADMIN /CLERICAL FEES - CAP PROJ ( 8,267 ( 8,094 I I 0 I 0 I 0
4410 MISCELLANEOUS I 0 I 0 I I 294 I 0( 0
4414 LICENSES, TAXES, & FEES ( 0 I 0 I. I 260 I 0 ( 0
4427 DISEASED 'TREE REMOVAL CONTRACT
I 0 I 0 I i 100 i O i p
OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL I 14,429 I 14,993 I I 139,471 I 0( 0
4443 MULTI -USE HOURLY CHARGES I 7 4 I 154 I I 2,737 I 0 I 0
"ENTRAL GARAGE RENTAL RA'Z'ES 'TOTAL I '74 I 154 I I 2,737 I 0 I 0
4512 RIGHT OF WAY & EASEMENT COSTS I 0 I 0 I I 3,410 I 0 I 0
4531 SPECIAL, ASSESSMENTS ON LAND I 16,869 I 0 I I 0 0 I I 0
I I
4560 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS I 415,383 I 579,714 I I 1,562,205 I 553,000 I 528,000
• CI'T'Y OF BR •
OOKLYPT CENTER
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 6
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
Object Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
CAPI'T'AL OUTLAYS TOTAL 432,252 579,714 1,565,615 553,000 i 528,000
4701 TRANSFERS TO GENERAL FUND i 90,000 i 0 i i 0 i 0 i 0
4727 SPECIAL ASSESS CONST TRANSFER i 0 i 7,357 i i 0 i 0 i 0
4732 M.S.A. BOND 'TRANSFER i 309,471 i 306,725 i i 0 ' 0 i 0
TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL + 399,471 314,082 0 ( 0 , 0
t4SA FUND TOTAL i 919,924 1,184,473 1,930,118 553,000 528,000
MUNICIPAL STATE AID CONSTRUCTN TOTAL I 919,924 1,184,473 1,930,118 553,000 ` 528,000
i
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 10
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
Object Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
-------- - - - - -- ------- ______
DIV WATER FACILITY MAINTENANCE 670
4100 WAGES OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES ( 22,612 I 32,837 I 28,678 ( 22,222 I 72,902 I 72,902
I I I I i
4112 OVERTIME OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES I 5,829 I 6,525 I 2,318 I 5,167 I 3,846 I 3,846
I I I I I
4130 WAGES OF PART -TIME EMPLOYEES I 418 I 1,292 I 412 I 691 I 9,476 I 0
SALARIES AND WAGES TOTAL I 28,859 I 40,654 I 31,408 I 28,080 I 86,224 I 76,748
4141 PERA BASIC PLAN I 4 I 24 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0
I I I i I i
4142 PERA COORDINATED PLAN I 1,273 I 1,753 I 1,407 I 1,227 I 3,863 I 3,438
4146 FICA I 2,164 I 3,043 I 2,403 I 2,128 I 6,596 I 5,871
4151 HEALTH INSURANCE I 0 I 1,423 I 2,640 I 2,854 ( 8,640 I 8,640
I I I I I I
4152 LIFE INSURANCE I 0 I 10 I 20 I 20 I 44 I 44
4153 DENTAL INSURANCE I 0 I 63 I 317 I 107 I 360 I 360
4154 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE I 823 I 1,756 I 1,339 ( 882 I 2,633 I 2,339
FRINGE BENEFITS TOTAL I 4,263 I 8,073 I 8,126 I 7,219 I 22,136 I 20,692
4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES I 38 I 4,702 I 1,000 ( 41 I 3,000 I 3,000
4223 CLEANING SUPPLIES I 0 I 0 50 I 0 I 50 I 0
i I I
4226 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
0 0 10 OUO 5
i I I i 0 0
I
4227 SAFETY SUPPLIES 377 0
I 38 0 142 0 0
I
4230 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 5,448 I 1,232 I 5,500 ( 773 I 15,700 I 5,700
4231 EQUIPMENT PARTS I 0 I 20 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0
I I I I i
4233 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES I 238 I 636 I 2,400 I 170 I 2,400 I 2,400
I
4234 STREET MAINTENANCE MATERIALS I 0 I 5,309 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0
CITY OF BROOKLY1v 'NTER 0
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 11
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
!b'ect Code
& Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL AC'T'UAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
4243 UTILITY SYSTEM SUPPLIES I 398 I 32 { 95 I 4,436 I 0 I 0
I I I I I I
:SUPPLIES TOTAL I 6,499 I 11,932 I 19,425 I 5,568 I 21,150 I 11,100
4351 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION I 0 1 0 I 250 I 0 I 0 I 0
"OMMUNICATIONS TOTAL I 0 1 0 1 250 I 0 1 0 1 0
4380 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE CONTRACT I 2,196 0 1 2,260 I 0 1 0 I 0
I I I I I
4382 EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE ( 0 I 0 I 500 I 2,147 I 3,770 I 3,770
l I I I I I
4383 BUILDINGS REPAIRS ( 1,690 I 30 I 6,000 I 0 I 2,200 I 2,200
I I I I I I
'HIPAIR, RENTAL, & MAINTENANCE TOTAL I 3,886 I 30 I 8,760 I 2,147 I 5,970 I 5,970
I I I I I I
4400 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES I 7,513 I 26,362 I 8,930 I 2,265 ( 0 I 0
I I I I I I
4414 LICENSES, TAXES, & FEES I 5,147 I 5,718 I 6,000 I 5,747 I 0 I 0
?THER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL I 12,660 I 32,080 I 14,930 I 8,012 I 0 1 0
4440 FUEL CHARGES I 0 1 8 1 0 1 8 1 0 1 0
4441 FIXED CHARGES I 0 1 519 I 510 431 I 0 1 0
I I I I
4442 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE CHARGES I 0 I 90 I 278 I 46 ( 0 I 0
I I I I I I
4443 MULTI -USE HOURLY CHARGES I 6,387 I 13,750 ( 8,350 ( 5,936 I 0 I 0
I I I I I I
'ENTRAL GARAGE RENTAL RA'T'ES TOTAL I 6,387 I 14,366 I 9,138 I 6,421 I 0 I 0
4481 ELECTRIC SERVICE I 138,960 I 140,536 I 55,211 I 129,773 I 145,883 I 136,428
I I I I I I
4482 GAS SERVICE I 4,488 I 4,402 I 0 I 3,734 I 5,587 I 5,587
4484 WATER SERVICE ( 38 I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
• CITY OF BROOKLYENTER is
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 12
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
Object Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
4485 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE I 170 , 17o 0 128 766 766
4488 STORM WATER DRAINAGE ) 2,817 3,096 0 2,436 3,000 3,000
UTILITIES TOTAL 146,472 148,204 55,211 136,070 155,236 145,781
4560 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 14,590 5,487 25,000 I 17,060 I 11,500 11,500
CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL ( 14,590 5,487 25,000 17,060 11,500 11,500
4920 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE 0 66,210 69,440 I 0 57,000 57,000
4922 LOSS ON FIXED ASSET DISPOSAL I 0 494 0 ( 0 0 0
OTHER EXPENDITURES TOTAL I 0 66,704 69,440 0 57,000 57,000
WATER FACILITY MAINTENANCE TOTAL 223,615 327,530 241,688 210,578 359,216 328,791
I
• •
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 13
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
)bject Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
DIV WATER OPERATIONS 671
4100 WAGES OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES 102,899 110,672 138,719 88,923 114,724 81,260
4112 OVERTIME OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES 10,962 12,867 7,726 11,589 0 7,693
4114 MILI'T'ARY PAY I 469 0 0 0 0 0
4130 WAGES OF PART -TIME EMPLOYEES 5,582 ( 15,560 6,386 ' 10,021 824 ` 9,476
4131 OVERTIME OF PART -TIME EMPLOYEE 0 0 0 6 0 0
4133 VACATION PAY I 16,468 14,764 0 10,557 0 0
4134 HOLIDAY PAY i 10,847 11,205 0 I 6,688 I 0 0
4135 SICK LEAVE PAY 7,459 I 13,935 0 I 4,778 ( 0 0
4199 SALARIES REIMBURSED 89, 109,560 115,652 95,050 0 _ 0
SALARIES AND WAGES TOTAL 244,062 288,563 268,483 227,611 115,548 I 98,429
4141 PERA BASIC PLAN i 6 i 55 i 0 i = __ - - - - - 0 I 0 I 0
4142 PERA COORDINATED PLAN I 6,722 7,274 I 6,847 I 5,502 5,177 ( 4,410
4146 FICA 11,663 13,331 11,692 ( 10,006 8,839 7,530
4151 HEALTH INSURANCE ( 19,683 ) 12,241 12,661 I 8,695 11,240 7,100
4152 LIFE INSURANCE f 142 88 I 92 , 60 66 44
4153 DENTAL INSURANCE 883 526 1,501 322 547 187
4154 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE ( 3,415 5,618 6,240 3,798 3,582 2,972
FRINGE BENEFITS TOTAL 42,515 39,133 ( 39,033 28,384 29,451 22,243
4210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 I 124 50 0 50 50
4212 PRINTED FORMS 1,207 I 1,401 2,000 1,571 2,000 2,000
CITY OF 00
BR KLYj CENTER
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 14
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
Object Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES I 3,641 3,163 4,890 2,872 4,300 4,300
4225 SHOP SUPPLIES 504 28 0 0 i 0 i 0
4226 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 55,336 57,310 53,000 59,104 63,000 63,000
4227 SAFETY SUPPLIES 803 720 1,100 163 1,400 1,400
4230 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 7,612 11,577 10,200 6,289 0 ' 12,000
4233 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 0 42 0 126 0 0
4234 STREET MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1,373 ( 939 3,300 922 0 2,970
4236 SIGNS & STIPING MATERIALS I 130 I 0 I 0 I 0( 0 i 0
4240 SMALL TOOLS I 888 0 500 I 46 I 500 500
4243 UTILITY SYSTEM SUPPLIES 1,621 0 I 700 0 700 700
SUPPLIES TOTAL 73,115 75,303 75,740 71,093 71,950 ( 86,920
4310 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES i - _- - - = - - p i = - = = 1 560 I -- _ - - - - - 0 I - - - 13 893 I i
4311 BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION I 0 0 0 23 I 0 0
4312 LEGAL SERVICES ( 0 148 0 0 0 0
4313 AUDIT & FINANCIAL SERVICES 1,275 I 1,295 1,345 4 1,330 1,375 1,375
CONSULTING TOTAL I 1,275 3,003 1,345 I 15,246 1,375 1,375
4321 POSTAGE 14,259 17,097 I 18,000 15,501 18,000 18,000
4322 TELEPHONE SERVICES 599 I 632 ( 600 I 607 632 709
4324 DELIVERY SERVICE I 0 BO 0 0 0 0
4334 USE OF PERSONAL AUTO 0 ( 18 0 ( 0 0 ( 0
4350 PRINTING 0 288 0 314 0 0
czrY on o»ooxLYm���zox
MruvAooe nocnMo onoouz *noxSRonz BY ozvzSzom page zs
1997 eV000r
zyoa 1997 1997
)bje code & Description 1994 1995 noopzoo AS or oEpz m*moosn
Division code a Description acrnou ACTUAL anoGur 10/31/96 aE0naaron nocoMmom000
*»sz LEGAL morzco pnaLzcaTzom
0 _-_____ _---___- _-_ _---_- 250
omm
[� mvzcarzonS zoznL z«,oso zo 18 16 18 18.e59
ozoo nopAzn a nuzmromamcn ComznACr o «ss o n o o
ezoo commomIcarz0m sxarom nAzwr z'aas 1,219 z'zon 1,043 o z'ono
43*7 LoGro cxAnnso
--- --- 9,815 '-- -__ __- 25
/npnzn oowznu & mAzwzomAmco ruzuL 11.875 zz 22 zo.y«s 25,025 za.*zz �
0000 oTxon cowrnAccnxL aonvzcoa 12,105 12.107 zo.o?n 4.829 1*.000 19,000
o*oz uwcnLLscTxuLo cxoCxS zup u o n o o
4*11 comFonomco3 AND ucxomus 1,788 z z ?su 1,600 u.*uo
4412 noozzmn oxpowooa o o o 255 n n
4413 DUES os a aouocnzprzoms pu 1 ?nu z.n«z ?on 700 �
4414 Lzcumsoa, zxzoS, a roOo 46.206 46 «a.zoo 34.797 58,000 su
4415 czAIwa PxvMomz n 1 n n o o �
�
*«z7 aooKo AND nopsnEmco MATERIALS n
-------- ------ -------- ------_ 200 200
/zxoR cnmTDucznuu aoRvzCou rornL 60,347 62,265 o« 41,779 79,500 00.500
oo«n rooL cxanno3 n zo n uz 13 13
yooz pIuuo cyAnoos a'?on 1.334 1.310 1.108 963 y«»
1442 aoeuzn a nxzmromumco cxnuooa 700 ao« ?zs z19 apo uyu
o««s mourz'oao HOURLY cuAa000 zs 36.109 uo.n«s 20.991 51,836 51
| |
x«e REPLACEMENT cuAmooa 0� 1 ______ | 0 | _______0 ' 0 '
CITY OF BROOKLYN 0
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 16
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
object Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
CENTRAL GARAGE RENTAL RATES TOTAL 34,256 , 37,841 42,070 22,239 53,508 53,508
4461 GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE 7,907 8,909 9,100 8,990 9,100 9,100
4462 PROPERTY INSURANCE 4,370 4,072 4,500 4,164 4,300 4,300
4463 BOILER & MACHERY INSURANCE 0 0 I 0 733 1,000 1 ,0 00
(.NSURANCE TOTAL 12,277 12,981 13,600 f 13,887 ( 14,400 14,400
--- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- _________
4 ELECTRIC SERVICE ( 1,902 1,617 90,672 1,332 I 0 0
4485 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE i 0 0 766 0( 0 0
4487 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 588 1,584 16,000 0 I 0 0
U'T'ILITIES TOTAL 2,490 3,201 107,438 1,332 0 0
4551 OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 0 457 I 0 2,360 0 0
4552 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 I 0 0 I 0 13,430 13,430
CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL 0 457 0 2,360 13,430 13,430
4700 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 147,022 0 I 0( 0( 0 0
4702 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE TRANS 0 _ 0 0 0 117,819 ( 117,81
TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL 147,022 0 0 0 ( 117,819 11'7,819
--- - - - - -- _________
4920 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE 236,850 175,041 178,560 0 165,000 165,000
4922 LOSS ON FIXED ASSET DISPOSAL 5,063 0 I 0 0 I 0 0
')THER EXPENDITURES TOTAL ( 241,913 175,041 178,560 0 165,000 165,000
:•LATER OPERATIONS TOTAL 886,005 ( - 727,371 832,153 457,295 705,888 699,008
Division: Water Construction Projects
Budget Code: 672
•
PROFILE
Water system improvements made as part of the neighborhood street reconstruction or other improvement
projects. Proposed water utility capital projects for 1997 are:
Street and Utility Improvements Substantial water main improvements would be completed in association
with street improvement projects. An emergency water connection with Brooklyn Park would be
constructed during the reconstruction of France Avenue from 69th Avenue to the north City limits. This
project is described in Division 631, MSA fund. In the Orchard Lane West neighborhood street
improvement, approximately 5.3 miles of water main would be replaced. This project is described in
Division 632, special assessment construction fund.
Repair Paint on Tower #2. The structure and coatings on Tower #2 (Dupont and 69th) are due for repairs.
The tower was last coated and repaired in 1984. Its coatings are generally in good condition but require
repair, especially the exterior coating. Upon completion, the coatings should be in satisfactory condition
for five to ten years.
Replace SCADA System. Included in 1997 is the professional services necessary to design and specify a
replacement SCADA System for control and alarming of the water system. The current system was installed
in 1987 and is outdated and costly to maintain. Replacement of the actual system would take place in 1998.
Miscellaneous. Well #10 is due for periodic well rehabilitation. The pump and shaft are removed and
inspected and repaired as necessary. An additional miscellaneous project is the contribution of the water
utility to the replacement of the fuel tanks at the Central Garage.
DEPARTMENTAL GOALS
Perform, in a cost - effective manner, water system improvements as a part of neighborhood street
reconstruction of other improvement projects.
PERSONNEL
No staff are currently assigned to this program.
•
CAPITAL OUTLAY
• Item Anticipated Units Cost(s) Use /need
purchase date
France Avenue Street and Utility Spring 1997 $118,700 Emergency water connection
Project with Brooklyn Park.
Orchard West Street and Utility Spring 1997 $1,001,050 Replacement of unlined cast
Project iron water main for water
quality improvement.
Repair Paint on Tower #2 Summer $250,000 Periodic maintenance for
1997 structural and coatings integrity
contribute to project.
Replace SCADA System late Summer $25,000 Professional services for 1998
1997 project to replace outdated
system.
Periodic Well Rehabilitation Summer $25,000 Pump and shaft are removed
1997 and inspected and repaired as
necessary.
Replace Fuel Tanks, Central Garage Spring 1997 $25,000 Contribute to project.
•
CITY OF BROOKLYNOTER
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 17
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
ibject Code & Description 1.994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
-------- - - - - -- _____________
)IV WATER CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 672
4100 WAGES OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES 169 0 0 0 0 I 0
4112 OVERTIME OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES 66 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0
;ALARIES AND WAGES TOTAL I 235 0 0 I 0 i 0 i 0
4142 PERA COORDINATED PLAN 11 0 0 I 0( 0( 0
4146 FICA f 18 , 0 0 0 0 0
4154 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 6 0 I 0 0 ( 0 0
RINGE BENEFITS TOTAL 34 0 I 0 I 0 0 0
4310 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 _ 0 I 0 0 50,000 50,000
I
'ONSULTING TOTAL 0 I 0 0 0 I 50,000 ( 50,000
4408 ENGINEERING FEE CAPITAL PROJ ' 0 0 0 0 I 5,000 5,000
)'['HER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL 0 0 0 0 5,000 5,000
4443 MULTI -USE HOURLY CHARGES 3 0 0 0 0 0
'ENTRAL GARAGE RENTAL RATES TOTAL 3 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 0
4560 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS i 0 i � i i
0 0 0 388,700 388,700
'APITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 388,700 388,700
4727 SPECIAL ASSESS CONST TRANSFER I 0 0 0 , 0 1,001,050 1,001,050
'RANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 1,001,050 1,001,050
CITY OF BROOKLYNOTER •
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 18
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
Object Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
WATER CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS TOTAL 272 0 0 0 1,444,750 1,444,750
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
•
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 19
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
!bject Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
DIV STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION PROJ 681 I { I { { {
4100 WAGES OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES I 15 I 0 I 0 { 0 { 0 { 0
>ALARIES AND WAGES TOTAL I 15 I 0{ 0 I 0 I 0 I 0
4142 PERA COORDINATED PLAN I l I 0 I 0( 0 I 0{ 0
{ I { I I
4146 FICA 1 0
I o
{ I I O I O I 0
4154 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE { 0 I 0 I 0 { 0 ( 0 { 0
'RINGE BENEFITS TOTAL I 2 I 0 I O I O I O I 0
'TORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION PROJ TOTAL { 17 I 0 I 0 { 0 { 0 { 0
I { I I { {
r1ATER UTILITY FUND TOTAL I 1,109,909 I 1,054,901 { 1,073,841 { 667,873 { 2,509,854 { 2,472,549
I
• CITY OF BROOKLYNOTER •
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 20
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
abject Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
- - -- - -- - -------- - - - - -- -------- - - - - --
)IV SEWER FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 675
4100 WAGES OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES i 20,149 i 20,323 i 22,472 i 20,763 i 33,464 i 33,464
4112 OVERTIME OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES I 8,476 7,678 3,245 5,948 7,693 3,846
4130 WAGES OF PART -TIME EMPLOYEES 299 393 206 433 0 0
I I I I l
SALARIES AND WAGES TOTAL 28,924 28,395 25,923 27,144 41,157 37,310
4141 PERA BASIC PLAN ( 0 2 0 0 0 0
4142 PERA COORDINATED PLAN 1,282 1,254 1,161 1,197 I 1,844 1,672
4146 FICA I 2,179 2,132 I 1,983 2,049 3,148 2,854
4151 HEALTH INSURANCE 0 1,040 2,069 1,962 I 2,600 2,600
4152 LIFE INSURANCE 0 ( 7 I 15 i 14 22 22
4153 DENTAL INSURANCE ( 0 41 248 70 1 360 360
4154 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE i 794 i 1,076 i 1,085 i 732 1,196 i 1,117
-RINGS BENEFITS TOTAL I 4,255 5,551 6,561 6,025 9,170 8,625
4210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0( 0 I 0 343 I 0 0
4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1,055 170 1,100 204 ' 0 1,000
4226 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 2,632 2,400 2,500 3,157 I 0 0
4227 SAFETY SUPPLIES 48 0 50 0 0 0
4230 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES i 4,965 i 1,571 i 4,000 i 146 i 2,000 i 4, 000
;UPPLIES TOTAL 8,700 4,141 7,650 3,850 2,000 5,000
4310 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 15,699 0 56,343 0 0
czry OF onoouLxm Nznn
MANAGER nacomo 0000nr woaxSxooz or nzvzSzom page cz
1997 aoonor
1996 19e7 1997
bject Code & Description 1994 znys Aonproo AS OF oupz wuwuoon
Division Code & Description Aczn*u xcruxL anoomz zo/az/p* auUoouToo nEcomMowoEo
nnauLTzwo zozxL n zs o so.a«s n o
� o»zz zELopHowo aoRvzcoa o sz* s«o *nz son son
4351 LEGAL woTzco eooLzcAzzom
------- -------- -------_ 150 0 0
�owwnmzcxTzoma zozsL o sza 340 o«z 500 soo
4380 nopAzn a naImromxNcm comzuacr zoV o 140 o o n
«soz xoro o0ozpMomr nopAzn s?« 1 n o o o
«zoa cVMmuwzcArzom uYorsw wnzwr
_—__-- 0 �l 0
.opxzx, xomrxL, a mxzmromomcu TOTAL ooz 1 z«o o o o
*400 oruoR comzaACzoAu aonvzcoo z 1 z 2,026 n 2
44 LICENSES, zo z uwono rnxoa a F000 0 0 0 240 o � �
�
`n/oa cnmzxxcrOaL oonvzCD3 zozuL z 1 z z,zo* n z
4440 ruou cxAaooa o 000 6* 106 n »
oxoz rzxoo coAomoa o 10 11.028 n.ss« u u
oo«z nopuzn a mazmromamco CuanoEa n 1,150 azz sos n n
4443 MULTI -USE uonn�� ca�e�oa
- 8,722 ___ --_ __- _ -__
uwraAu oAnnGu aEmznL RATES Torau 8,722 au,zz« 24.40e 20,e59 n o �
**81 oLocznzc oouvzco
19,e66 19,_186 8,019 __- 19,694 --_- _--� 21,590
zzLzrzoa Torxu 19,866 19,186 8.019 19 20,500 21.590
«sa
• CITY OF BROOKLYN ZENTER •
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 22
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
abject Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
4552 OTHER EQUIPMENT i 0 i 0 f 0 i 2,317 i 0 i 0
4560 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 0 0 0 I 617,454 0 0
,:APITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL 0 i -- 0 0 620,863 0 0
4700 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 218,828 0 ( 0 0 0 0
TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL ) 218,828 0 0 I 0 0 I 0
4920 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE 0 43,592 I 66,500 0 42,000 42,000
)THER EXPENDITURES TOTAL 0 43,592 I 66,500 0 42,000 42,000
SEWER FACILITIES MAINTENANCE TOTAL 291,980 142,627 142,542 ( 757,785 I 115,32 "1 117,525
• CITY OF BROOKLYNTENTER •
,MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 23
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
>bject Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
)IV SEWER OPERATIONS 676 I
I I I I I I
4100 WAGES OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES I 46,259 I 50,698 l 62,367 I 37,849 I 66,928 I 66,928
I I I I i
4112 OVERTIME OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES I 6,769 I 9,098 I 2,164 6,658 I 3,846 I 0
I I I I I I
4130 WAGES OF PART -TIME EMPLOYEES I 2,054 I 1,261 I 3,296 ( 1,421 I 0 I 824
I I I I i
4199 SALARIES REIMBURSED I 89,375 I 73 ,0 0 I 77,102 I 63,370 I 0 I 0
>ALARIES AND WAGES TOTAL I 144,457 I 134,096 I 144,929 ( 109,298 I 70,774 l 67,752
4141 PERA BASIC PLAN I 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 I 0 1 0
I I I
4142 PERA COORDINATED PLAN I 2,378 I 2,678 I 3,038 I 1,994 I 3,171 I 3,035
I I I I i I
4146 FICA I 4,133 I 4,570 I 5,189 I 3,453 I 5,414 I 5,183
I I I I i l
4151 HEALTH INSURANCE I 0 1 7,011 I 5,616 I 4,662 I 7,100 I 7,100
I I I I
4152 LIFE INSURANCE I 0 I 49 I 39 I 32 I 44 I 44
I I I I i I
4153 DENTAL INSURANCE I 0 I 270 I 652 I 157 I 187 I 187
I f I I I I
4154 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE I 1,347 I 2 ,278 I 2,643 ) 1,225 I 2,154 I 2,100
i I I I i
'BINGE BENEFITS TOTAL I 7,858 I 16,858 I 17,177 I 11,522 1 18,070 I 17,649
4210 OFFICE SUPPLIES I 0 I 124 I 30 I 0 1 350 I 350
l I I I I I
4212 PRINTED FORMS I 371 I 1,395 I 2,400 I 1,162 I 2,400 I 2,400
I I I i i I
4220 OPERA'T'ING SUPPLIES I 2,092 I 4,409 I 5,610 I 225 I 4,000 I 6,000
I I
4226 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS I 0 I 0 I 0( 15 I 3,200 I 4,000
I I i I
4227 SAFETY SUPPLIES ( 663 I 670 I 650 I 614 I 700 I 1,044
I i I I I
4230 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ( 5,328 I 286 I 2,000 I 10 ( 500 ( 1,000
4233 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES I 0 I 0 1 480 I 0 I 0 0
• •
CITY OF BROOKLY N CENTER
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 24
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
Object Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
4234 STREET MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 204 85 0 I 0 0 0
4236 SIGNS & STIPING MATERIALS 84 0 I 0 i 0 i 0 i 0
4240 SMALL TOOLS 888 0 500 46 500 500
4243 UTILITY SYSTEM SUPPLIES I 0 0 150 ( 0 150 150
SUPPLIES TOTAL 9,630 6,969 I 11,820 2,072 11,800 15,444
4310 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 0 0 I 11,914 0 I 0
4312 LEGAL SERVICES 0 2,532 0 0 0 I 0
4313 AUDIT & FINANCIAL SERVICES 1,275 1,295 1,345 1,330 1,375 1,375
CONSULTING TOTAL ( 1,275 3,827 1,345 13,244 1,375 1,375
4321 POSTAGE I 3,848 5,224 9,000 5,453 6,000 6,000
4322 TELEPHONE SERVICES I 599 I 633 600 596 1,159 1,159
4324 DELIVERY SERVICE 0 84 0 i 0 i 0 0
4330 TRANSPORTATION I 59 0 0 0 0 0
COMMUNICATIONS TOTAL 4,506 5,941 9,600 6,049 7,159 7,159
4386 COMMUNICATION SYSTEM MAINT 1,383 2,861 3,180 3,347 ( 3,200 3,200
4389 MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS ( 0 870 ( 0 1 0 I 0 0
4397 LOGIS CHARGES 10,492 9,815 21,564 15,901 ( 25,025 25,025
REPAIR, RENTAL, & MAINTENANCE TOTAL ( 11,875 13,546 24,744 19,248 28,225 28,225
4400 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ( 10,466 I 2,754 I 17,000 638 17,000 21,903
4411 CONFERENCES AND SCHOOLS I 115 450 1,120 700 1,120 1,120
CITY OF BROOKLYONTER •
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 25
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
abject Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
4413 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS I 320 59 320 0 320 320
4414 LICENSES, TAXES, & FEES 15 55 50 46 50 50
4415 CLAIMS PAYMENT 0 150 0 0 0 0
4423 SANITARY SEWER DISPOSAL CHARGE I 1,395,261 1,427,330 1,431,659 1,119,033 1,450,000 I 1,500,501
)THER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL I 1,406,178 1,430,798 1,450,149 1,120,417 1,468,490 1,523,894
4440 FUEL CHARGES 203 325 100 I 166 361 361
4441 FIXED CHARGES 5,235 17,098 17,249 13,348 17,388 17,388
4442 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE CHARGES 400 I 1,799 347 790 I 2,130 I 2,130
4443 MULTI-USE HOURLY CHARGES 12,947 15,129 I 32,248 24,489 26,031 26,031
4444 REPLACEMENT CHARGES i 0 I 28,3 0 I 0 0 0
VENTRAL GARAGE RENTAL RATES TOTAL 18,785 I 62,707 I 49,944 38,794 45,910 I 45,910
4461 GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE 18,208 4,746 5,000 5,022 5,200 5,200
4462 PROPERTY INSURANCE 1,104 I 1,028 1,200 1,052 1,200 1,200
4463 BOILER & MACHERY INSURANCE 0 0 0 185 0 0
INSURANCE TOTAL 19,312 5,774 6,200 6,260 I 6,400 6,400
4481 ELECTRIC SERVICE 0 I 0 12,543 0 0 I 0
4485 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 0 0 0 119,305 0 I 0
4487 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 26 0 0 0 0 - 0
ITILITIES TOTAL 26 0 12,543 119,305 0 0
4552 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 0 I 3,650 0 3,650 3,650
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER •
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 26
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
()bject Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
4560 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 0 5,840 0 0 0 0
CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL I 0 I 5,840 3,650 4 0 3,650 3,650
4612 PAYING AGENT FEES 300 0 0 0 I 0 0
DEBT SERVICE TOTAL 300 0 0 0 0 0
4702 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE TRANS 0 0 0 I 0 78,546 78,546
TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 78,546 78,546
4920 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE I 110,855 70,540 108,500 I 0 90,000 I 90,000
4922 LOSS ON FIXED ASSET DISPOSAL 0 1,041 0 0 0 0
OTHER EXPENDITURES TOTAL 110,855 71,582 108,500 0 90,000 90,000
SEWER OPERATIONS TOTAL 1,735,057 1,757,939 1,840,601 1,446,208 1,830,399 1 1,886,004
Division: Sewer Construction Projects
Budget Code: 677
•
PROFILE
Sewer system improvements made as part of the neighborhood street reconstruction or other improvement
projects. Proposed sanitary sewer utility capital projects for 1997 are:
Street and Utility Improvements. Substantial sanitary sewer main improvements would be completed in
association with street improvement projects. Some main would be replaced and some main relined during
the reconstruction of France Avenue from 69th Avenue to the north City limits. This project is described
in Division 631, MSA fund. In the Orchard Lane West neighborhood street improvement, about half the
main would be replaced. This project is described in Division 632, special assessment construction fund.
INTRAC Replacement. Included in 1997 is the professional services necessary to design and specify a
replacement system for control and alarming of the sanitary sewer collection system. The current system
was installed 15 years ago and is outdated and costly to maintain. Replacement of the actual system would
take place in 1998.
Miscellaneous. The sanitary sewer utility would contribute to the replacement of the fuel system at the
Central Garage.
DEPARTMENTAL GOALS
Perform, in a cost - effective manner, sewer system improvements as a part of neighborhood street
reconstruction of other improvement projects.
PERSONNEL LEVELS
Currently, no staff is assigned to this position.
CAPITAL OUTLAY
Item Anticipated Units Cost(s) Use /need
purchase date
France Avenue Street and Utility Spring 1997 $31,500 Replacement and relining of
Project mains as necessary.
Orchard West Street and Utility Spring 1997 $514,750 Replacement of mains as
Project necessary.
INTRAC Replacement Summer $25,000 Professional services for 1998
1997 project to replace outdated
system
Replace Fuel Tanks, Central Garage Spring 1997 $25,000 Contribute to project.
• CITY OF BROOKLY011- INTER •
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 27
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
)bject Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
!)IV SEWER CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 677
4100 WAGES OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES I 60 847 0 I 2,465 0 0
4112 OVERTIME OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES i 0 113 0 I 23 0 I 0
4130 WAGES OF PART-TIME EMPLOYEES i 56 i 0 0 22 0 I 0
;ALARIES AND WAGES TOTAL I 116 960 I 0 I 2,511 0 0
4142 PERA COORDINATED PLAN 3 43 0 112 I 0 I 0
4146 FICA
8 71 0 186 0 I 0
4154 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 3 27 I 0 30 0 0
FRINGE BENEFITS TOTAL I 13 141 0 327 0 I 0
4310 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0 I 25,000 25,000
"ONSULTING TOTAL
O 0 I 0 0 I 25,000 25,000
4351 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 0 0 0 139 0 0
_*OMMUNICATIONS TOTAL 0 I 0 0 I 139 0 ( 0
4400 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES I 0 0 I 0 330 0 0
)THER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL I 0 0 0 330 0 0
4443 MULTI-USE HOURLY CHARGES 0 84 0 313 0 0
.'ENTRAL GARAGE RENTAL RATES TOTAL 0 84 0 38 0 0
4560 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 0 0 0 0 56,500 56,500
CITY OF BROOKLYN ONTER •
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 28
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
lbject Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
'APITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL 0 0 I 0 0 I 56,500 56,500
4727 SPECIAL ASSESS CONST TRANSFER 0 ( 0 I 0 0 514,750 514,750
TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL 0 0 I 0 I 0 514,750 514,750
;EWER CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS TOTAL 129 1,186 0 3,345 596,250 596,250
SANITARY SEWER FUND TOTAL 2,027,166 1,901,752 1,983,143 ( 2,207,337 2,541,976 2,599,779
CITY OF BROOKLY*TER
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 29
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
!bject Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
-------- - - - - -- -------- - - - - --
!LV STORM SEWER OPERATIONS 680
4100 WAGES OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES ( 2,107 I 2,389 0 14,010 ( 0 ( 0
4112 OVERTIME OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES ( 44 ( 0 0 ( 83 ( 0 ( 0
4130 WAGES OF PART -TIME EMPLOYEES ( 0 0 0 ( 1,119 ( 0 ( 0
4199 SALARIES REIMBURSED ( 100,000 100,000 ( 100,000 ( 83,330 ( 0 0
'ALARIES AND WAGES TOTAL ( 102,151 I 102,389 ( 100,000 98,542 ( 0 ( 0
4142 PERA COORDINATED PLAN ( 96 107 ( 0 I 631 0 ( 0
4146 FICA ( 164 173 I 0 ( 1,142 ( 0 I 0
4154 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE ( 30 ( 39 0 ( 528 ( 0 ( 0
'BINGE BENEFITS TOTAL ( 290 319 ( 0 ( 2,301 I 0 I 0
4210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 16 0 0 0 900 900
4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES ( 0 ( 25 ( 0 ( 539 ( 0 ( 0
4230 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 3,162 ( 0 3,000 0 0 ( 0
4234 STREET MAINTENANCE MATERIALS I 0 0 I 0 ( 113 ( 0 ( 0
UPPLIES TOTAL 1 3,178 ( 25 ( 3,000 ( 652 ( 900 ( 900
4310 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ( 3,266 ( 51,81 ( 44,000 ( 40,344 ( 20,000 ( 0
ONSULTING TOTAL ( 3,266 ( 51,819 ( 44,000 ( 40,344 ( 20,000 ( 0
4321 POSTAGE i o i o
( ( 500 ( 0 ( 500 ( 500
4324 DELIVERY SERVICE ( 21 ( 0 ( 30 ( 40 ( 0 ( 0
4334 USE OF PERSONAL AUTO ( 0 ( 14 ( 90 ( 0 ( 90 ( 90
CITY OF BROOKLYN � •
�,�NTER
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 30
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
bject Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
4350 PRINTING ( 0 { 0 { 1,000 { 0 { 1,000 { 1,000
'OMMUNICATIONS TOTAL { 21 { 14 { 1,620 { 40 { 1,590 { 1,590
4400 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES { 25,644 { 3,818 { 2,000 { 0 { 2,000 { 14,100
4411 CONFERENCES AND SCHOOLS { 295 { 26 { 0 { 0 { 0 { 0
4413 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS { 9,074 { 0 { 10,000 { 0 { 33,400 { 33,400
4417 BOOKS AND REFERENCE MATERIALS { 0 { 9 { 0 { 0 { 0 { 0
THER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL { 35,013 { 3,852 { 12,000 { 0 { 35,400 { 47,500
4440 FUEL CHARGES { 569 ( 526 { 461 { 749 { 538 { 538
4441 FIXED CHARGES i 10,036 i 10,682 i 10,689 ( 8,968 ; 13,265 ; 13,265
4442 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE CHARGES i 5,744 I 7,751 i 8,148 i 13,420 i 8,582 i 8,582
4443 MULTI -USE HOURLY CHARGES { 30 { 146 { 0 { 6,681 { 152 { 152
4444 REPLACEMENT CHARGES { 0 { 0 { 0 { 0 { 9,000 { 9,000
'ENTRAL GARAGE RENTAL RATES TOTAL { 16,379 { 19,105 ( 19,298 { 29,818 { 31,537 { 31,537
4461 GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE { 2,100 { 2,116 { 2,500 1,957 2,500 { 2,500
NSURANCE TOTAL { 2,100 { 2,116 { 2,500 { 1,957 { 2,500 { 2,500
4610 DEBT SERVICE PRINCIPAL PAYMENT { 0 { 0 { 110,000 ( 110,000 { 155,000 { 155,000
4611 INTEREST 30,208 i 90,625 i 88,315 i 88,315 i 82,595 i 82,595
4612 PAYING AGENT FEES { 0 { 300 { 500 { 300 { 500 { 500
EBT SERVICE TOTAL { 30,208 { 90,925 { 198,815 ( 198,615 { 238,095 ( 238,095
CITY OF BROOKLYNOLINTER
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 31
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
)bject Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
4700 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 128,358 f 0 0 0 0 0
4704 STORM SEWER WAGE REIMBURSEMENT 0 0 0 0 1 00,000 100,000
RANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL 128,358 0 0 I 0 100,000 100,000
4920 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE 888 5,471 32,000 0 I 57,000 57,000
4922 LOSS ON FIXED ASSET DISPOSAL 7,428 I 0 I 0 0 0 0
ITHER EXPENDITURES TOTAL 8,317 5,471 32,000 o 57,000 57,000
;'FORM SEWER OPERATIONS TOTAL 329,281 276,035 413,233 372,268 487,022 479,122
Division: Storm Sewer Construction Projects
Budget Code: 681
PROFILE
Storm sewer system improvements made as part of the neighborhood street reconstruction or other
improvement projects. Proposed storm drainage utility capital projects for 1997 are:
Street and Utility Improvements. Some storm drainage improvements would be completed in association
with street improvement projects. Minor additions to the drainage system would be made during the
reconstruction of France Avenue from 69th to the north City limits. This project is described in Division
631, MSA fund. Some upgrading of existing and addition of new drainage facilities would be completed
in the Orchard Lane West neighborhood street improvement. This project is described in Division 632,
special assessment construction fund. Finally, miscellaneous structure improvements are planned, including
reconstructing some outfalls to the Mississippi River.
Special Studies. Two studies would be completed. The first would be a detailed "Phase II" study of one
of -the remaining areas of the City to be evaluated. These studies are necessary to plan future street and
utility studies. The second is a Surface Water Study to evaluate the quality of water in Shingle Creek,
Palmer Lake, and Twin Lakes, and determine methods of improving water quality.
DEPARTMENTAL GOALS
• Perform, in a cost - effective manner, storm sewer system improvements as a part of neighborhood street
reconstruction of other improvement projects.
PERSONNEL LEVELS
No staff are currently assigned to this program.
CAPITAL OUTLAY
Item Anticipated Units Cost(s) Use /need
• purchase date
France Avenue Street and Utility Spring 1997 ($31,500) Minor adjustments to existing
Project drainage system.
Orchard West Street and Utility Spring 1997 $229,650 - Upgrade and add to existing
Project drainage system.
$ 334,100 -Storm drainage assessments.
$563,750 - Total.
Structure Improvement Summer $50,000 Repair Mississippi River
1997 outfalls.
Phase II Study Summer $50,000 Detailed need analysis for
II I 1997 future projects.
Surface Water Study Summer $50,000 Detailed need analysis for
1997 $25,000 future projects.
from SDU
I
•
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 32
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
)bject Code & Description 1994 1.995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
)IV STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION PROJ 681
f
4100 WAGES OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES i 44 i 0 i 0 i 40,339 i 0 i 0
4112 OVERTIME OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES i 0 i 0 i 0 i 5,851 i 0 i 0
4130 WAGES OF PART -TIME EMPLOYEES i 0 i 0 i 0 i 2,940 i 0 i 0
4131 OVERTIME OF PART -TIME EMPLOYEE i 0 i 0 i 0 i 546 i 0 i 0
SALARIES AND WAGES TOTAL I 44 I 0( 0 I 49,676 0 0
4141 PERA BASIC PLAN 0 0( 0 I 1,076 i 0 0
4142 PERA COORDINATED PLAN 2 I 0( 0 1,636 0 I 0
4146 FICA I 3 0 0 2,915 0 0
4154 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 1 0 I O I 736 ( 0 0
'BINGE BENEFITS TOTAL 6 0 0 6,363 0 0
4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES 0 0 0 41 0 0
4235 LANDSCAPING MATERIALS I 0 I 0 0 14 I 0 0
�UPPLIES TOTAL 0 0 0 55 0 0
4310 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 17,724 5,352 0 88,032 4 75,000 75,000
4312 LEGAL SERVICES 2,047 0 ( 0 1,445 0 0
4313 AUDIT & FINANCIAL SERVICES 400 0 0 0 0 0
'ONSULTING TOTAL 20,171 5,352 0 89,477 y 75,000 75,000
4324 DELIVERY SERVICE 0 I 0 I 0 I 8 I 0 I 0
4351 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 0 0 0 359 0 0
• CITY OF BROOKLY*ENTER •
MANAGER RECOMD BUDGET WORKSHEET BY DIVISION Page 33
1997 BUDGET
1996 1997 1997
?bject Code & Description 1994 1995 ADOPTED AS OF DEPT MANAGER
Division Code & Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 10/31/96 REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
'OMMUNICATIONS TOTAL 1 0 I 0{ 0{ 366 1 0 I 0
4400 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1 0 1 0{ 0 1 2,090 { 0( 0
I
4410 MISCELLANEOUS 1 20,130 1 0 I 0 1 0 I 0{ 0
4427 DISEASED TREE REMOVAL CONTRACT 1 0 { 0 { 0 { 700 { 0 { 0
i I 1
)THER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL { 20,130 { 0 { 0 { 2,790 { 0 1 0
4443 MULTI -USE HOURLY CHARGES { 0 ( 0 1 0 { 1,955 1 0 1 0
'C;NTRAL GARAGE RENTAL RATES TOTAL 1 0{ 0{ 0{ 1,955 1 0 1 0
4510 CAPITAL OUTLAY LAND 1 0 I 0{ 0 I 3,327 1 0 I 0
4512 RIGHT OF WAY & EASEMENT COSTS 1 0 1 0 { 0 { 719 { 0 { 0
I I ( I I (
4560 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS { 1,248 { 0 1 0 ( 222,276 1 268,500 1 268,500
'APITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL 1 1,248 1 0 1 0 1 225,583 { 268,500 1 268,500
4727 SPECIAL ASSESS CONTT TRANSFER 1 � ` i i i i
{ { 0 { 0 { 0 { 563,750 { 5 63,75 0
-
i'RANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS TOTAL { 0{ 0 1 0 1 0 1 563,750 1 563,750
:TORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION PROJ TOTAL { 41,598`1 5,352 1 0 1 376,265 i 907,250 ( 907,250
;TORM SEWER FUND TOTAL 1 370,879 1/ 281,386 1 413,233 1 748,533 1 1,394,272 1 1,386,372
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE
• ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
NOVEMBER 25, 1996
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in regular session and was
called to order by President Myrna Kragness at 8:50 p.m.
ROLL CALL
President Myrna Kragness, Commission members Kathleen Carmody, Debra Hilstrom, Kristen
Mann, and Charles F. Nichols, Sr. Also present: Executive Director Michael J. McCauley, City
Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Council Secretary LeAnn Larson.
• APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA
A motion by Commission member Carmody and seconded by Commission member Hilstrom
to approve the agenda and consent agenda as printed passed unanimously, with the continuation
of the public hearing for the conveyance of MN/Dot turnback property to the adjacent property
owner, Tony and Suk Grabowski, 6337 Dupont Avenue North, until December 16, 1996.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A motion by Commission member Carmody and seconded by Commission member Hilstrom
to approve the minutes of the November 12, 1996 -- Regular Session as printed passed
unanimously.
COMMISSION CONSIDERATION ITEMS
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOS i AND AUTHORIZING CONTRACT FOR
ACQUISITION AND RELOCATION SERVICES FOR 53rd AVENUE DEVELOPMENT
AND LINKAGE PROJECT
Executive Director McCauley discussed the recommendation of staff to accept the proposal for
acquisition and relocation services submitted by Evergreen Land Services Company for the
• 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project.
11/25/96 -1-
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO. 96-30
Member Hilstr n and moved its adoption:
•
om introduced the following resolution p
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AND AUTHORIZING CONTRACT FOR
ACQUISITION AND RELOCATION SERVICES FOR 53rd AVENUE DEVELOPMENT
AND LINKAGE PROJECT
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Carmody and passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION. ESTABLISHING OFFER OF JUST
COMPENSATION, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OR PURCHASE AGREEMENT,
AUTHORIZING RELOCATION CLAIM AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT FOR
ACQUISITION COSTS AND RELOCATION COSTS FOR 512 53rd AVENUE NORTH
Executive Director McCauley discussed the need for acquiring one parcel in the 53rd Avenue
Development and Linkage Project area at this time due to a property closing date of November
29, 1996, on replacement housing. This acquisition was moved ahead to accommodate the
homeowners. Copies of the appraisal report, review appraisal, and purchase agreement for this
property were available for Council consideration.
RESOLUTION NO. 96 -31 .
Member Hilstrom introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION, ESTABLISHING OFFER OF JUST
COMPENSATION, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OR PURCHASE AGREEMENT,
AUTHORIZING RELOCATION CLAIM AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT FOR
ACQUISITION COSTS AND RELOCATION COSTS FOR 512 53rd AVENUE NORTH
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Mann
and passed unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT
A motion by Commission member Carmody and seconded by Commission member Hilstrom
to adjourn the meeting at 8:56 p.m. passed unanimously.
President
Recorded and transcribed by: •
LeAnn Larson
11/25/96 -2-
• Commissioner introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
EDA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF EXCESS HIGHWAY RIGHT
OF WAY
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has declared
a parcel of right -of -way located behind the noise wall bordering I -94 at Dupont Avenue North,
a legal description of which is as follows:
Tract A. That part of Lot 3, Block 1, Frank Burch's 2nd Addition, according to the plat
thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for
Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies westerly of the following described line:
Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 2 said Block 1; thence run southwesterly
to a point on the south line of Lot 4 said Block 1, distant 25 feet west of the
southeast corner thereof and there terminating;
which lies northerly of Line 1 described below:
• Line 1. Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 3, distant 37.11 feet southerly of
the northwest corner thereof; thence run easterly to a point on the east line of Tract
A hereinbefore described, distant 29.51 feet southerly to the northeast corner
thereof and there terminating.
(hereinafter the "Subject Property") to be excess and no longer needed for highway purposes; and
WHEREAS, Mn/DOT has agreed to convey the Subject Property to the Economic
Development Authority for consideration of $996.70; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Brooklyn Center that the
Subject Property be put to productive use; and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is a blighting influence due to inefficient and
obsolete lot configuration and location and is underutilized; and
WHEREAS, the owners of adjacent property, Tony and Suk Grabowski, have
requested that the Subject Property be conveyed to them, to be combined with their residential
parcel for residential and related accessory uses; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to due notice, the Authority has held a public hearing on the
• sale of the Subject Property; and
i RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, the Authority has determined that it is reasonable, fair, and in the
interest of the public to convey the Subject Property to Tony and Suk Grabowski on the terms
hereinafter set forth:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development
Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The President and Executive Director are authorized and directed to take
such actions as are necessary to acquire the Subject Property from MnDOT for the consideration
of $996.70 and to convey the Subject Property to Tony and Suk Grabowski for the sum of
$996.70 plus required filing fees.
Date President
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by commissioner
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof:
and the
following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
• MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 9, 1996
TO: Michael McCauley, City Manager
FROM: Scott Brink, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Resolution Authorizing Conveyance of Mn/Dot Turnback
Property to the Adjacent Property Owner
At the November 25, 1996 EDA Meeting, a date of December 16, 1996 was established to hold a
Public Hearing to convey a portion of Mn/Dot property to an adjacent property owner. A notice
of the public hearing has been published in the City's official newspaper.
Gary and Suk Grabowski, 6337 Dupont Avenue North, have been working with Mn/Dot over the
past couple of years to acquire a parcel of property owned by Mn/Dot. The property desired is a
small parcel of property (see attached sketch and legal description)that is no longer needed for
highway purposes. The Grabowskis would like to acquire the property for the purposes of
constructing an adjacent garage.
• As stated, the Grabowskis have been working with Mn/Dot for an extensive amount of time.
Apparently the property can only be directly acquired from Mn/Dot through a public bidding
process which can be very lengthy. However, Mn/Dot can also convey the property directly to
the City, who in turn may convey it to the adjacent property owner. Although the City must also
follow a public hearing process to convey the parcel, this is still apparently a quicker process,
and was recommended to the Grabowskis by Mn/Dot.
The property owners therefore impressed their request upon the City, since their garage was
recently destroyed by fire. The City subsequently forwarded a request to Mn/Dot for the parcel.
The City then received notice from Mn/Dot that the property would be conveyed to the City
upon receiving payment in the amount of $996.70. At their November 12, 1996 meeting, the
EDA authorized. payment to Mn/Dot for the parcel.
The City has just recently received the deed for the property from Mn/Dot. It is therefore
recommended that the EDA conduct the public hearing and authorize conveying the parcel to the
Grabowskis. In addition, the EDA has already received a check in the amount of $996.70 from
the Grabowskis for this parcel.
•
J�
September 26, 1996
2786244J.901
•
DESCRIPTION FOR RECONVEYANCE
Parcel 244J S.P. 2786 (94 =393) 901
That part of Tract A described below:
Tract A. That part of Lot 3, Block 1, Frank Burch's 2nd Addition, according to the
plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in
and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies westerly of the following
described line: Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 2 said Block 1;
thence run southwesterly to a point on the south line of Lot 4 said Block 1,
distant 25 feet west of the southeast corner thereof and there terminating;
which lies northerly of Line 1 described 'below:
Line 1. Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 3, distant 37.11 feet
• southerly of the northwest corner thereof; thence run easterly to a point
on the east line of Tract A hereinbefore described, distant 29.51 feet
southerly of the northeast corner thereof and there terminating.
Subject to the following restriction:
No access shall be permitted to Trunk Highway No. 94 from the lands herein conveyed
except that access shall be permitted to Dupont Avenue.
•
• W fi 61 � J.
• � 4 1 C1U i
�\,� -� -- -► � 1 \ . �� (' '' c � •( ! 7 to -f� a•u f �.
tit
to
j LR
ti.
it
I. �i 4 A n .
I I ( D Ili (P
it
1 _ �1 � _ -. � \ f) \\ ((( \ 111 \ • ' � , 1 , r 1 ( ' - ,
�Iu) 11
I I \ D I �► \ l..o.
I
N,
Minnesota Department of i ransportaticn
' a
Transportation Building
,-g6 Behr Ir i =r Office Tel: 612 - 296 -8647
e , ,c 30!Lie '3rd
Saint P3ui. Mirres= _ j -1599
•
October 24, 1996
Scott A. Brink
City Engineer
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, NLN 55430 -2199
In reply refer to: 7300
S.P. 2786 (94 =393) 901
Hennepin County
Parcel 244J
Reconveyance
Dear Mr. Brink:
I am pleased to inform you that all approvals have been obtained for the conveyance of
the above referenced parcel.
• The value of said 4,100 square foot tract is 51,000.00. If this is acceptable, please
submit payment of 5996.70 ($1,000.00 less $3.30 State Deed Tax) in the form of a
cashier's check, certified check or money order made payable to " o rnmissinner 0f
Tran�n�rr�tinn - Tnmk Niohwa F„nri you will be responsible for payment of the
deed tax at the time of recording of the Quit Claim Deed. Upon receipt of payment the
State will issue a Quit Claim Deed using, the enclosed legal description to the City of
Brooklyn Center.
Please submit payment and any questions you may have regarding this transaction to
Ron Deustermann, Transportation Building, 395 John Ireland Boulevard, Mailstop 632,
St. Paul, NLN, 55155 (phone 612- 296- 8647).
Sincerely,
lip
K. F. Rasmussen, Director
Office of Right of Way and Surveys
Enclosures:
• Legal Description (1)
Map (1)
! Memorandum
To: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
From: Tom Bublitz, Community Development Specialist /
Date: December 12, 1996
Subject: Resolution Authorizing Acquisition, Establishing Offer of Just Compensation,
Authorizing Negotiation and Execution of Purchase Agreement, Authorizing
Payment for Acquisition, Closing Costs and Relocation Claims for Various
Properties Located in the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project
There are 25 properties remaining to be acquired in the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage
Project area. Appraisals have been completed on ten of these properties and the attached EDA
resolution would authorize negotiations and execution of purchase agreements within the limits
of the appraisal amounts. Excerpts from the appraisals along with the review appraisals are
included with this memorandum.
The following table provides a summary of these appraisals and a comparison of the appraised
values to the 1996 estimated market values (EMVs) for the properties. It should be noted that
• review appraisals confirm the values established by the initial appraisals in all the properties.
Address Appraised Value 1996 EMV Percent Over 1996 EMV
710 -53rd Ave. No. $57,000 $50,100 14%
806 -53rd Ave. No. $60,000 $55,200 9%
5309 Camden $71,500 $66,100 8%
5306 Bryant $70,000 $58,900 19%
5311 4th Street No. $79,000 $71,300 11%
706 -53rd Ave. No. $61,000 $52,500 16%
818 -53rd Ave. No. $79,000 $67,700 17%
5304 Bryant Ave. No. $77,500 $67,400 15 %
5307 Camden Ave. No. $76,000 $71,000 7%
5301 4th Street No. $65,000 $57,400 13%
• Note: In addition to those listed above, the following appraisals were prepared on properties
already acquired.
• Memorandum to Michael J. McCauley
December 10, 1996
Page 2
Address Appraised Value 1996 EMV Percentage Over EMV
714 -53rd Ave. No. $62,000 $56,400 10%
512 -53rd Ave. No. $75,500 $63,900 18%
Note: The average "Percentage Over EMV" for appraisals to date is 13.1 %. The budget estimate
is 15% over 1996 EMV.
Upon approval by the EDA, Evergreen Land Services Company will present a letter to the
respective homeowners offering to purchase their property at the property's appraised value. If
the offer of appraised value is acceptable to the owner, the EDA Executive Director is authorized
to execute the purchase agreement on behalf of the EDA. Evergreen Land Services Company
has drafted a purchase agreement which they have found to work well in public acquisitions.
The purchase agreement is essentially identical to the one used in the Park & Ride acquisitions
for the City. A copy of the purchase agreement is attached.
• In addition to the purchase agreement, Evergreen Land Services Company will be meeting with
eligible home owners and tenants to prepare relocation claims. This is a separate process from
the purchase agreement, and the attached resolution would provide the EDA Executive Director
to authorize payment of the claim pursuant to the City's purchasing policy.
Two of the homeowners on the list described in this memorandum have expressed an interest in
closing on their properties at the end of December. To the extent possible, staff will make every
effort to meet this closing date. The majority of the remaining properties are anticipated to close
in January. Additional appraisals are underway and the next group of appraisals will be
presented to the EDA Board at their first meeting in January 1997.
•
J. Scott Renne, MAI
• Real Estate Appraiser • Consultant -REALTOR
2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408
(612) 871 -1417 • FAX (612) 871 -1481 • PAGER (612) 661 -3256
August 9, 1996
Brad Hoffman
Community Development Director
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 710 53rd Avenue
North, Brooklyn Center; Development process, complete appraisal /Report type, summary
appraisal report
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
Pursuant to your request, I have completed a market value appraisal report of the above
referenced property.
• The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple
interest of the subject property as of August 4, 1996. The report is subject to the
contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report.
The term market value is defined as:
The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to
cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should
sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to
fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self -
interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress.
The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible
property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal
M was a complete appraisal assignment and the report type is summary appraisal report.
The scope of the assignment included:
Physical inspection y p ion of the subject neighborhood and property on August 4,
1996.
- Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale
- Highest and best use analysis
- Application of the appraisal process
A general description of legal data is:
- According to Hennepin County records the fee owner is Robert and Nancy
Mikulak
- The PID is 01- 118 -21 -34 -0021; The legal description is:
The east 50 f the West 200 f eet o feet, ee Lot 10 Block 3 Bellvue Acres
Addition
- The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $659.14 plus specials of $8.46 for a
total of $667.60 based on an estimated market value of Land $16,200;
Building $29,200; Total $45,400
- According to Hennepin County records the property sold in October, 1996
for $45,000
• A general description of the subject site is:
An interior rectangular shaped lot with dimensions of 50 x 126 feet located
on 53rd Avenue North between Bryant Avenue North and Camden Avenue
North.
- Zoned R -2. Two family residential district.
The site is served by all municipal utilities. Infrastructure serving the area
has concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter with bituminous surfaced streets.
Landscaping is average with grass, shrubs, and trees. The rear yard is
fenced.
A general description of the subject improvements is:
- A detached single family home; construction is wood frame with gable style
roof; full basement with limited finish and 6 1 /2 foot ceiling height (13
courses of 6 inch block; floor joists are spanned 18 inches on center); wood
shake siding on home, wood lap siding on garage; asphalt shingle roof;
double hung windows; 1.25 story design with low ceiling height (6 feet, 9
•
Page 2
Reconciliation
Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the
subject property as of August 4, 1996 is:
....................... ...............................
Cost Approach $51,100
Sales Comparison Approach $58,000
Income Approach Not applied
VALUE CONCLUSION $57,000
This conclusion is based upon my personal inspection and review of the subject property,
comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process.
Respectfully Submitted,
a
J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE
Page 16
REVIEW APPRAISAL
•
A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION
1. Owner of Property: Robert A. & Nancy A. Mikulak
2. Location of Property: 710 53rd Avenue N., Brooklyn Center, Mn.
3. Appraiser: J. Scott Renne
4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project
5. Just Compensation: $57,000.00
B. DATA
1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family
2. Zoning: R -2
3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall'and Swift Residential Building Cost
• Land value determined by comparable sales.
4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied.
5. Market Approach: Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects
neighborhood. Four sales were arms- length and one utilized
a sale to a government agency but on the same block as the
subject.
•
C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made.
All data appears to be representative of the market for the
subject property. No Adjustments to Mr. Renee's conclusions
were necessary. All calculations and determinations were
considered to be accurate and within applicable standards.
•
D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and
conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with
applicable standards. No different approaches to value were
deemed necessary.
E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the
value of $57,000 (Fifty Seven Thousand
Dollars) recommended by Mr. Renee be
considered the fair market value for
August 4, 1996.
•
•
CERTIFICATION
I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Robert A. & Nancy A.
Mikulak, on this 20th Day of November, 1996 and certify the following statements regarding this
review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge:
1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The
purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes
of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the
property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which
would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with
knowledge and without undue stimulus.
2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as
• comparable sales by the appraiser.
I I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein.
4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been
performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and
Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements.
5.1 have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the
interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other
identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies
and examines the appraisal report reviewed.
Based upon my review of the above- listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in
conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land
and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of November 20,
1996, is recommended at $57,000.00 (Fifty Seven Thousand Dollars).
SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi
Review Appraiser Date f I/ ✓ / '
•
Witness Date
J. Scott Renne, MAI
Real Estate Appraiser • Consultant • REALTOR
2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH . MIN NEA POLIS, MINNESOTA 55408
• (612) 871-1417 - FAX (612) 871 -1481 • PAGER (612) 661 -3256
November 9, 1996
Brad Hoffman
Community Development Director
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 806 53rd Avenue
North, Brooklyn Center; Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary
appraisal report
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
Pursuant to your request, I have completed a market value appraisal report of the above
referenced property.
The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple
interest of the subject property as of November 2, 1996. The report is subject to the
contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report. I
i
The term market value is defined as:
i
The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to
cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should
sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to
fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self-
interes 4 g and assumi that neither is under undue duress. '
I I
The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible
acquisition. This report prepared in conformance with the Uniform was re
property �l P P P
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal
was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report.
The scope of the assignment included:
Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on November
2, 1996. The owner accompanied the appraiser on the inspection.
Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale
•
• - Highest and best use analysis
Application of the appraisal process
A general description of legal data is:
According to Hennepin County records the fee owner is Coll een G. Kopet
The PID is 01- 118 -21 -34 -0029; The legal description is:
West 50 feet of East 100 feet of Lot 11, Block 3, Bellvue Acres
The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $72158 plus specials of $9.26 for a
total of $730.84 based on an estimated market value of Land $16,700;
Building $34,300; Total $51,000
According to Hennepin County records the property has not sold within
the past five years.
•
'i
•
Page 2
• Reconciliation
Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the
subject property as of November 2, 1996 is:
............ io}?: y}}i?'•?: {i• ?:• }TT.::::::::::.:v:.v:.v:: v: .............. v... T................ t. v.......+........... .............v::.v:. .......:.... .... .............. ....
::4•T: {:: {:::::: •::: :. }:•}:•Ti:. }: { {h}: {.i •. ::nv; {ti i:w.vi:•: }i }:G ?T: {. }: {n;,v}::: 4.v
............
::.w; v: ....; .. v::. n::•. yv v:::{ i:: t;{:T:: v: vw.• nw:::: nv:....., w::::. v:::: :n.....::::: } ? } ?'.:n:{{. } }: {..: ........:. :..:: .. .. ......+.
...........
+. t. } }:•},.v:•..t::::::::. :: v: {vv.• .. :.v::::::n . ......:..:...... ti:CnY4: { {<.. .v........... n...:. .............:...............: ........v {;i• } }:•:i{• ? %!':
... v} :ti }�:• ?:.:v {:tiff �: ?:Si: ?' {:•::.v:::::: t
w.:::;,.�.:::':....n..: ?:: }•: i.:y:.v:w::.v, _:. : :::: ...... .t .......... .v4 "::::::::::. vv:,. •::.
w:;:.vnv. ++, ?.v: m::::: •: vv v: 4:: % }:T�:•:: v• ...vv. n } ? }::Ti:•: ?ti
...vv:.: };::: n::v::::::' {: {:: • :....•�. . v v : •• .v............ v .. n,}}:?.v::....: w::::•::::nw :.:.............. n...:::•. v.: v :::::v: :.:...............v.,... .. ..:.:
......:.. ............:..... .........,•.:t•:::: .......... {• ?....t. ......: .........:... fi............. t....:: T............:.........:•T._:.: }:: ..::TT ....t....t.t•} }::::............
.: \..,..... ....{. n� tv �::: :4:T:::::..t ...,....+ :n .; . .....1f .. ...: i}::::.:v :. :.....:::: :::::::v::::n;:.�w: :......:vv•• :•:?,t.; .....:. i
{vv•.v:...; ..: .vv v.v:: •vv••: •nt•:. v ..v •:v:::: :..v... ........n....... ... \.. \....� .. .. $�y� .. .: nvnv::{: i}?:.}T•;:::: :: ? }i:{•i:.:,v'.•:�{: }2 {:ti }itii;
.....:.. hx nv....., •..; .x.v}4 {::w; v: }:::::: T:iv ::.: w:.. •:::.v v; :..vv..,v ........:............ W�j�1 }; { ^:• ?} }': nv ?:w.:::.: nv:::t. }i }n.::::: } ::. .:; ?:ii................. ............
:::::.w:ti {.: tii:: {.::::::.:: w..:.. ........v: ?Tt.........{.:.};:.. \... v. vv......xt, •.v vv; ,, .................. .....................:....::::: { {•}4...v..................
+ .....................v::. L• \. h. L.... �{•...v...v 4 ? ? }:i : {:. ?:::v: � �.v •::::: v.v:::::.w.v :v.v :; : ........... :: .. •n::::::::.......:.v:::::.vx: nv:........:...... w.....
........ �....:: v...:.v........' .....:.. .xpi... ....v............ T.......::::: x:; h. vl..v4.........vvv: v : :...................::.v..v ... \.. ...::: �•.
' .t.vvnv:: ?n:vT::• ? ? ?: {::: ;:.v::.iW.vT:n wx•.vlv..t...... ... :.....v...... ... v... n....4 .v........ .. .:..... x ..
..v:: v :::..::::::........:. 4 ,.:::.v::: :.......... .L'i: v::., ... x ................t...:.......... v ... ......................:......n. :.. x...x....
w:::.::.v.:....::::. . , :v::•• : v. {•?;{tii:•T ? ? }: {. ?w:: � `:vi: iT:G:• } } ::................. n•: .::: n....v.., \ :....v.. v...................:..
............ v::::: };.vv.v::: :; ..; .. vn.t.......,, ........v...v... vv- .v.:.v::: ?::: mv:: • :•: }:::.v :.vvv..v .t•AT:: E
- .......v ... v:: w:•::.v ::v::.v:: i .:............. ..v::::::v.:.:::.v..: } } ::.w:::; T: }nv::::::...... ...w....., ....... T:...... ...
...... w.vnv.:v:; ....:: {. ? }:{: %.} }v ?•: {: %'R:.v:.vx v:::. iii %'nv::::::: ......................... 4 ......... ........t.........v............ ...�. .........
::: :........ vw: vv: •nv:::: T ? "v{•:...... . ..v....... .}......... nU •; }.v: xv:: w.v::; w: ?::::::?:...v.....v: ; :•: : w:::::. .....v ...................:..v.. n..... ....................:.......... J.v .:. .. ..tt........
w.v::::..v ....u....v......... invv. +vx t..:.. W:: v.v :.:: ......................::: :............................. :::::...........nn: ?:::........ 4
• ?i ? }:: {•Y:vv.� ::4 ::..:.......... ..... T. v.:i'::.;....:.v.......n . v ...::nvyv.y :v: • }: .v •:::.....
x }v.
Cost Approach $55,800
Sales Comparison Approach $61,000
Income Approach Not applied
VALUE CONCLUSION $60,000
This conclusion is based upon my personal inspection and review of the subject property,
comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process.
Respectfully Submitted,
2
J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE
t
•
Page 17
REVIEW APPRAISAL
•
A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION
1. Owner of Property: Colleen G. Kopet
2. Location of Property: 806 53rd Ave. N., Brooklyn Center, Mn.
3. Appraiser: J. Scott Renne
4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project
5. Just Compensation: $60,000.00
B. DATA
I. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family
2. Zoning: R -2
3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost
• Land value determined by comparable sales.
4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied.
5. Market Approach: Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects
neighborhood. Four sales were arms - length and one utilized
Was a sale to government but on the same block as the
subject. This should be noted in Mr. Renne's appraisal.
•
C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made.
All data appears to be representative of the market for the
subject property. No Adjustments to Mr. Renee's conclusions
were necessary. All calculations and determinations were
considered to be accurate and within applicable standards.
Note: the sale of 718 53rd Avenue N. to a government entity
should be noted in the appraisal.
•
D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and
conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with
applicable standards. No different approaches to value were
deemed necessary.
E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the
value of $60,000 (Sixty Thousand
Dollars) recommended by Mr. Renee be
considered the fair market value for November 2,
1996.
•
CERTIFICATION
I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Colleen G. Kopet, on this
19th Day of November, 1996 and certify the following statements regarding this review to be true
and complete to the best of my knowledge;
1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The
purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes
of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the
property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which
would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with
knowledge and without undue stimulus.
2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as
comparable sales by the appraiser.
3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein.
4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been
performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and
Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements.
5. I have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the
interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other
identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies
and examines the appraisal report reviewed.
Based upon my review of the above- listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in
conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land
and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of November 19,
1996, is recommended at $60,000.00 (Sixty Thousand Dollars).
SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi
r
Review Appraiser " � Date (v/ / k
•
Witness Date
J. Scott Renne, MAI
• Real Estate Appraiser • Consultant • REALTOR
2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408
(612) 871 -1417 • FAX (612) 871 -1481 • PAGER (612) 661 -3256
November 11, 1996
Brad Hoffman
Community Development Director
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 5309 Camden Avenue
North, Brooklyn Center; Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary
appraisal report
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
Pursuant to your request, I have completed a market value appraisal report of the above
referenced property.
i The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple
• interest of the subject property as of November 9, 1996. The report is subject to the
contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report.
The term market value is defined as:
The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to
cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should
sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to
fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self -
interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress.
The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible
' property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal
was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report.
The scope of the assignment included:
Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on November
9, 1996. The owner accompanied the appraiser on the inspection.
• - Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale
Highest and best use analysis
i' •
- Application of the appraisal process
A general description of legal data is:
According to Hennepin County records the fee owner is Donald R.
Erickson
Ar
The PID is 01- 118 -21 -34 -0018; The legal description is:
The North 67 feet of that part of Lot 9 lying East of West 150 feet thereof, Lot
9, Block 3, Bellvue Acres
The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $913.23 plus specials of $11.73 for
a total of $924.96 based on an estimated market value of Land $17,800;
Building $45,100; Total $62,900
- as of sold '
According to Hennepin County records the property thin h n within
the past five years.
•
•
Page 2
• Reconciliation
Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the
subject property as of November 9, 1996 is:
Cost Approach $69,500
Sales Comparison Approach $72,000
Income Approach Not applied
VALUE CONCLUSION $71
This conclusion is based upon my personal inspection and review of the subject property,
• comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process.
Respectfully Submitted,
J. Scott Renne MAI CAE
•
Page 17
F
REVIEW APPRAISAL
•
A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION
1. Owner of Property: Donald R. & Kalyn A. Erickson
2. Location of Property: 5309 Camden Ave. N., Brooklyn Center, Mn.
3. Appraiser: J. Scott Renne
4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project
5. Just Compensation: $71,500.00
B. DATA
1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family
2. Zoning: R -2
3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost
• Land value determined by comparable sales.
4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied.
5. Market Approach: Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects
neighborhood. All sales were arms - length.
•
C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made.
All data appears to be representative of the market for the
subject property. No Adjustments to Mr. Renee's conclusions
were necessary. All calculations and determinations were
considered to be accurate and within applicable standards.
D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and
. conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with
applicable standards. No different approaches to value were
deemed necessary.
E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the
value of $71,500 (Seventy One Thousand Five
Hundred Dollars) recommended by Mr. Renee be
considered the fair market value for November 9,
1996.
•
•
CERTIFICATION
I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Donald R. & Kalyn A.
Erickson, on this 19th Day of November, 1996 and certify the following statements regarding this
review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge:
1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The
purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes
of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the
property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which
would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with
knowledge and without undue stimulus.
2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as
comparable sales by the appraiser.
3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein.
4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been
performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and
Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements.
5. I have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the
interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other
identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies
and examines the appraisal report reviewed.
Based upon my review of the above- listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in
conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land
and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of November 19,
1996, is recommended at $71,500.00 (Seventy One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars).
SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi 3
Review Appraiser - mob Date
Witness Date
J. Scott Renne, NW
• .;; Real Estate Appraiser •Consultant •REALTOR
i I 2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408
(612) 871-1417 - FAX (612) 871 -1481 PAGER (612) 661-3256
November 2, 1996
Brad Hoffman
Community Development Director
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 5306 Bryant Avenue
North, Brooklyn Center; Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary
appraisal report
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
Pursuant to your request, I have completed a market value appraisal report of the above
referenced ro e
P P rh'•
The u ose of the
p rp appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple
interest of the subject property as of October 26, 1996. The report is subject to the
P J
contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report.
The term market value is defined as:
The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to
cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should
sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to
fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self -
interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress.
The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible
property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal
was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report.
The scope of the assignment included:
Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on October
26, 1996. Chester Haley accompanied the appraiser on the inspection.
- Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale
• Highest and best use analysis
Application of the appraisal process
A general description of legal data is:
-
According o Hennepin nnepm County records the fee owner is Chester. and Mary
Haley
The PID is 01- 118 -21 -34 -0034; The legal description is:
Lot 1- 9 ., Block 3, Bellvue Acres: That pan of the north 112 lying west of the
east 150 feet thereof
The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $79853 plus specials of $10.25 for
a total of $808.78 based on an estimated market value of Land $18,100;
Building $36,900; Total $55,000
According to Hennepin County records the property sold in January, 1984
for $44,000
•
-a
Page 2
J 9 Reconciliation
Based on the analysis y described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the
subject property as of October 26, 1996 is:
Aff
::::: n: - .:::::::w.� :.�x:::::.� : +� :•:.:. �: ii:.:: i�:;:ii }iiii:t ??>:•? ii• ? ? ?:!i>:6:� ?:v }i ?: ? ?•: :..
............. p, ( �� Q ............... ;.....:: ?::.:. �: hv::w.: � �� :..aw; , -. •.:: 6'.•?:: �? ? ?S;- :nw:? ?• ?:Sti6:6 ?:'Si ?• ? ?'•:
i:? � ???:: 6? i?:•? ii?i??: vi: ? i ? ? ? ? ? ?i:� ?i ?i ? ? ? ? ?; >i: :: ?:�:i iiiJJ i:::: iiii ?i:•ii: ?: - "ii::i � ?i ?:fin.::...._ �ii
: : :::........... .... .................... ........ ..........:. Vii�7:.': -: ': ' ??:. ?:• ?: ?. ?:w:::; ? ? ?i ?::::.: S:vi:::'jii is ?i::iii:•Ti:::::: i:�:4:. ? ?::6 ?: ^:a ?• ? ?:: ?'4: ? ?i
i::i:: ?•: ?i+: iiii;:
Cost Approach $66
Sales Comparison Approach $71,000
Income Approach Not applied
VALUE CONCLUSION $70,000
This conclusion is based upon m p ersonal p y p nal inspection and review of the subject property,
comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process.
Respectfully Submitted,
J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE
Page 17
• REVIEW APPRAISAL
A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION
1. Owner of Property: Chester W. & Mary C. Haley
2. Location of Property: 5306 Bryant Ave. N., Brooklyn Center, Mn.
3. Appraiser: J. Scott Renne
4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project
5. Just Compensation: $70,000.00
B. DATA
1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family
2. Zoning: R -2
3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost
• Land value determined by comparable sales.
4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied.
5. Market Approach : Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects
neighborhood. Four sales were arms- length and one utilized
Was a sale to government but on the same area as the subject.
•
•
C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made.
All data appears to be representative of the market for the
subject property. No Adjustments to Mr. Renee's conclusions
were necessary. All calculations and determinations were
considered to be accurate and within applicable standards.
D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and
conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with
applicable standards. No different approaches to value were
deemed necessary.
E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the
value of $70,000 (Seventy Thousand
Dollars) recommended by Mr. Renee be
considered the fair market value for October 26,
1996.
•
•
CERTIFICATION
I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Chester W. & Mary C.
Haley, on this 19th Day of November, 1996 and certify the following statements regarding this
review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge:
1. I have made a complete review of the above- referenced appraisal for the subject property. The
purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes
of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the
property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which
would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with
knowledge and without undue stimulus.
2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject roe and of all parcels used as
P J property rtY P
comparable sales by the appraiser.
3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein.
4. 1 believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been
performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and
Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements.
5. I have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the
interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other
identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies
and examines the appraisal report reviewed.
Based upon my review of the above - listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in
conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land
and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of November 19,
1996, is recommended at $70,000.00 (Seventy Thousand Dollars).
49 SIGNED: Jose J. DaBruzzi
Date
Revi Ap
PP / c
Witness Date
J. Scott Renne, NLU
• w Real Estate Appraiser • Consultant • REALTOR
2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS408
(612) 871 -1417 FAX (612) 871 -1481 PAGER (612) 661 -3256
f
November 9, 1996
Brad Hoffman
Community Development Director
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 5311 4th Street North,
Brooklyn Center; Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary
j appraisal report
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
Pursuant to your request, I have completed a market value appraisal report of the above
referenced property.
The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple
interest of the subject property as of November 2, 1996. The report is subject to the
contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report.
The term market value is defined as:
The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to
cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should
sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to
fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self -
interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress.
The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible
property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal
was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report.
The scope of the assignment included:
-
Physical inspection of the subject neig h b orhood y p � gh orhood and property on November
2, 1996. The owners accompanied the appraiser on the inspection.
- Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale
Y P $
• Highest and best use analysis
Application of the appraisal process
A general description of legal data is:
- According to Hennepin County records the fee owner is Gordon N. Olsen
- The PID is 01- 118 -21-43 -0067; The legal description is:
South one half of Lot 9, Block Z Bellvue Acres
- The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $958.24 plus specials of $12.30 for
a total of $970.54 based on an estimated market value of Land $18,200;
Building $47,800; Total $66,000
- According to Hennepin County records the property has not sold within
the past five years.
•
•
Page 2
Reconciliation
•
Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the
subject property as of November 2, 1996 is:
::::. v:::.::. v: n} uJ: r???:• �:. �??:: i?} i}: v::::•??:•?i ii:•} isi??}:^: 6? r ? } ?i:•i:• ? ?}:•:� }::� ?:• }:hi::: ;::.::.v::: :.:: { ^ ?:v + Lv }�r:•:i-r ?r:•:i3:::::: :v. .....................v
?:�:4i ;i4'ri ? <}::i i~: iii:- : { {{•: r '
:..:.... : .... : . : .......v..........v.. -• • ......... :•:.v::.v::::::: ::v:.:: ` ': p•{ :• {r. {•:::: {. {rvti�i: ? ^ ? }:: +3; {: rr}, }:; : {:;
:::.v:: n :::.::.::::::.w .'; ^i:•:4:• ?:: i v:::::;:.:.:::::.:..:: ::w::. ^ '::. ':: .......: . .... .:... ... {...... v.. r........ n.., .v.., ::v:.:vv
��y7 j}::} i:;:;_{;: ti:; r ?r:. }:v.v:::.::v::::::::::.:vv :v v::::: v : :::::.:�vv::::•:
.COI .:...v::•:.::.::vti. }'•r:
:::::.v:: ;::, .....• ..... .:, n:•:: :::::::.v :v::::: :..•....,,v.v:: v.,:- nvv}}} n.... w::.vvv:.{':::. } } }:v::::::::::.
............. •:::::::.:v::::: ::::; w::: ::::::::.�:::::::.:nv:::::::::: nv:w: s.} n:.}: :::::.,y ? } ?`i'. } } } \ -0r ?i': :::::::::::. �:::::: w: :.::•:i {:i• ?:{J:4:w... ....... ..... ..... y.}:.x:•x::. v .. .... .:::
v.. : ,.... .............:.vv ......: nrvv •nw:: -.v •.v: nw:.v: • :;.,.,. :. n... n n:..:.:v::....ivv;.v: \v. ..
. ....... .............,.. w:: nv w.{{vhvvv4; ?:... .v ...... v.n.......... .1.... :•.w.J.v . \.
Cost Approach $86,300
Sales Comparison Approach $77,000
Income Approach Not applied
VALUE CONCLUSION $79,000
This conclusion is based upon my ersonal inspection and review of the subject
P P � property,
comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process.
Respectfully Submitted,
J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE
Page 17
• REVIEW APPRAISAL
A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION
1. Owner of Property: Gordon N. Olsen
2. Location of Property: 5311 4th St. N., Brooklyn Center, Mn.
3. Appraiser: J. Scott Renne
4. Project:. 53rd Avenue Project
5. Just Compensation: $79,000.00
B. DATA
1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family
2. Zoning: R -2
3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost
Land value determined by comparable sales.
4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied.
5. Market Approach: Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects
neighborhood.
•
C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made.
All data appears to be representative of the market for the
subject property. No Adjustments to Mr. Renee's conclusions
were necessary. All calculations and determinations were
considered to be accurate and within applicable standards.
D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and
conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with
applicable standards. No different approaches to value were
deemed necessary.
E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the
value of $79,000 (Seventy Nine Thousand
Dollars) recommended by Mr. Renee be
considered the fair market value for
November 2, 1996.
•
CERTIFICATION
I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Gordon N. Olsen, on this
20th Day of November, 1996 and certify the following statements regarding this review to be true
and complete to the best of my knowledge:
1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The
purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes
of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the
property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which
would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with
knowledge and without undue stimulus.
2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as
comparable sales by the appraiser.
3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein.
4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been
performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and
Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements.
5. I have re ared the attached and the
P P
hed written re por t, which delineates the subject prop P � J P P rtY
interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other
identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies
and examines the appraisal report reviewed.
Based upon my review of the above- listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in
conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land
and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of November 20,
1996, is recommended at $79,000.00 (Seventy Nine Thousand Dollars).
SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi �
�� � ,
ppraiser r C J✓ Date
Review A 111-41 C
Witness Date
•
J. Scott Renne, MAI
• Ai , Real Estate Appraiser • Consultant • REALTOR
2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS408
(612) 871 -1417 • FAX (612) 871 -1481 • PAGER (612) 661 -3256
November 23, 1996
Brad Hoffman
Community Development Director
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 706 53rd Avenue
North, Brooklyn Center; Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary
appraisal rep
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
Pursuant to your request, I have completed a market value appraisal report of the above
ro
P P e rtY• P P
referenced
The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple
interest of the subject property as of November 23, 1996. The report is subject to the
contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report.
The term market value is defined as:
The most robable rice as
P o a specified
P � f date, in cash or in terms equivalent urvalent to
cash, or in other precisely revealed
4
P l terms, for which the specified property rights should
sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to
fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self -
interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress.
The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible
property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal
was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report.
The scope of the assignment included:
Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and roe o n November
J $ p
23 1996.
The owners accompanied property
ccom arced the appraisers on the inspection.
P PP oon.
P
Survey and analysis of comparable sales and
Y • P offerings for sale
- Highest and best use analysis
•
- Application of the appraisal process
a
A general description of legal data is:
- According to Hennepin County records the fee owner is Daniel G.
Williams
The PID is 01- 118 -21 -34 -0024; The legal description is:
East 50 feet of West 250 feet of Lot 10, Block 3, Bellvue Acres
The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $686.74 plus specials of $8.82 for a
total of $695.56 based on an estimated market value of Land $16,200;
Building $31,100; Total $47,300
- According to Hennepin County records the property sold in 1995 for
$52,000.
i
•
Page 2
• Reconciliation
Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the
subject property as of November 23, 1996 is:
............
...............
............ ....
.:....:::: :::::::::::::::::::::::..:::::: . ...
........... ........
...............
....................
............. ......... ......
rx ........... . . ..... ...
.. .. ... .......................
-XI
.................... - ........... ... ...... ......
........ ................. ......... ......
. .. .... ..... -- .... ... . .....
. ... ......... .... .. . . . .. ............. -
Cost Approach $57,500
Sales Comparison Approach $61,000
Income Approach Not applied
VALUE CONCLUSION $61,000
This conclusion is based upon our personal inspection and review of the subject property,
• comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process.
Respectfully Submitted,
X
J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE Marri K Renne, CAE
•
Page 17
• REVIEW APPRAISAL
A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION
1. Owner of Property: Daniel G. Williams
2. Location of Property: 706 53rd Avenue N., Brooklyn Center, Mn.
3. Appraiser(s): J. Scott Renne and Marri Kunik Renne
4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project
5. Just Compensation: $61,000.00
B. DATA
1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family
2. Zoning: R -2
3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost
• Land value determined by comparable sales.
4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied.
5. Market Approach: Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects
neighborhood. Four sales were arms- length and one utilized
a sale to a government agency but on the same block as the
subject. Note should be made in appraisal of the government
sale.
•
C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made.
All data appears to be representative of the market for the
subject property. No Adjustments to the Renee's conclusions
were necessary. All calculations and determinations were
considered to be accurate and within applicable standards.
Note should be made of the government sale in the appraisal.
D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and
conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with
applicable standards. No different approaches to value were
deemed necessary.
E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the
value of $61,000 (Sixty One Thousand
Dollars) recommended by Mrs. & Mr. Renees be
considered the fair market value for
November 23, 1996.
•
•
CERTIFICATION
I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Daniel G. Williams, on this
5th Day of December, 1996 and certify the following statements regarding this review to be true
and complete to the best of my knowledge:
1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The
purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject roe for
Pm'P J property rtY purposes
of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the
property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which
would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with
knowledge and without undue stimulus.
2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject roe and of all parcels used as
P J property rtY P
comparable sales by the appraiser.
3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein.
• 4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been
performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and
Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements.
5. I have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the
interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other
identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies
and examines the appraisal report reviewed.
Based upon my review of the above- listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in
conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land
and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of November 23,
1996, is recommended at $61,000.00 (Sixty One Thousand Dollars).
SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi /2
Review Appraiser �,,� Date /
v — �
Witness Date
i
J. Scott Renne, MAI
• Real Estate Appraiser • Consultant • REALTOR
2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH - MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS408
(612) 871 -1417 - FAX (612) 871-1481 - PAGER (612) 661 -3256
December 5, 1996
Brad Hoffman
Community Development Director
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 818 53rd Avenue
North, Brooklyn Center; Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary
appraisal report
Dear Mr. Hoffinan:
Pursuant to your request, I have completed a market value appraisal report of the above
referenced property.
The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple
interest of the subject property as of November 23, 1996. The report is subject to the
contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report.
I The term market value is defined as:
( The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to
cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should
sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to
fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self-
interest; and assuming that neither is under undue duress.
The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible
property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal
was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report.
The scope of the assignment included:
- Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on November
23, 1996. The owners accompanied the appraisers on the inspection.
• - Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale
• - Highest and best use analysis
Application of the appraisal process
A general description of legal data is:
I
According to Hennepin County records the fee owner is Carolyn A. and
Richard A. Hayes
The PID is 01- 118 -21 -34 -0032; The legal description is:
West 50 feet of East 250 feet of Lot 11, Block 3, Bellvue Acres
- The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $924.84 plus specials of $11.88 for
a total of $936.72 based on an estimated market value of Land $16,200;
Building $47,500; Total $63,700
- According to Hennepin County records the property last sold in 1981 for
$61,000
•
Page 2
• Reconciliation
Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the
subject property as of November 23, 1996 is:
:<: >::::;:::
K i
::.........::..
. .. . ......
is
Cost Approach $84,300
Sales Comparison Approach $77,000
3
Income Approach
Not applied
VALUE CONCLUSION $799000
This conclusion is based upon our personal inspection and review of the subject property,
• comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process.
Respectfully Submitted,
J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE Marri K Renne, CAE
•
Page 17
REVIEW APPRAISAL
•
A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION
1. Owner of Property: Carolyn A. And Richard A. Hayes
2. Location of Property: 818 53rd Avenue N., Brooklyn Center, Mn.
3. Appraiser(s): J. Scott Renne and Marri Kunik Renne
4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project
5. Just Compensation: $79,000.00
B. DATA
1. Highest and Best. Use: R -1 Single Family
2. Zoning: R -2
3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost
• Land value determined by comparable sales.
4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied.
5. Market Approach: Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects
neighborhood. Four sales were "arms- length" and one utilized
a sale to a government agency but on the same block as the
subject.
• C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made.
All data appears to be representative of the market for the
subject property. No Adjustments to the Renee's conclusions
were necessary. All calculations and determinations were
considered to be accurate and within applicable standards.
D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and
conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with
applicable standards. No different approaches to value were
pP pp
deemed necessary.
E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the
value of $79,000 (Seventy Nine Thousand Dollars)
recommended by Mr. & Mrs. Renne be
considered the fair market value for November 23,
1996.
•
• CERTIFICATION
I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Carolyn A. And Richard A.
Hayes, on this 10th Day of December, 1996 and certify the following statements regarding this
review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge:
1. 1 have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The
purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes
of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the
property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which
would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with
knowledge and without undue stimulus.
2. 1 have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as
comparable sales by the appraiser.
3. 1 am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein.
4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been
performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and
• Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements.
5.1 have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the
interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other
identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies
and examines the appraisal report reviewed.
Based upon my review of the above - listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in
conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land
and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of November 23,
1996, is recommended at $79,000.00 (Seventy Nine Thousand Dollars).
SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBr=i
Review Appraiser l `' ;Date
Witness Date
J. Scott Renne, NLU
Real Estate Appraiser - Consultant • REALTOR
2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH - MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS408
(612) 871 -1417 - FAX (612) 871 -1481 - PAGER (612) 661 -32S6
i December 5, 1996
Brad Hoffman
Community Development Director
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 5304 Bryant Avenue
North, Brooklyn Center; Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary
appraisal report
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
# Pursuant to your request, We have completed a market value appraisal report of the
above referenced property.
The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple
interest of the subject property as of November 23, 1996. The report is subject to the
contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report.
The term market value is defined as:
The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to
cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should
sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to
fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self-
` interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress.
The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible
property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal
was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report.
The scope of the assignment included:
Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on November
23, 1996. The owner accompanied the appraisers on the inspection.
- Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale
• - Highest and best use analysis
Application of the appraisal process
A general description of legal data is:
According to Hennepin County records the fee owner is K. P. and M. L
Callahan
The PID is 01- 118 -21 -34 -0033; The legal description is:
That part of S 112 lying W of E 150 feet thereof, Lot 12, Block 3, Bellvue
Acres
The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $936.46 plus specials of $12.02 for
a total of $948.48 based on an estimated market value of Land $18,100;
Building $46,400; Total $64,500
- According to Hennepin County records the property has not sold within
the past five years.
3
I
1
i
{
I
i
i
i
•
Page 2
• Reconciliation
Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the
subject property as of November 23, 1996 is:
.. fi: • }•v }: •i }i `�'? i�: %vi::::.,:}::;:;':�i':� iiij }:ti<::'%iiiTi' ii:: ;:;:;:iii'riiiiiiiiiY: ^ }ii:�i} iii::;{:;:<;: S;: j< ji;:; s�::t%iiii: ?i' ?i: {i£�:
�1ii (tiff ^ }:G }:,•..::•:: :.'•..r n.. .:; }..: n....... .
:.. � rrvx::.;�; } ::ii iiJi:i iiii: >i }:::::: } } it > ?:• } t�ii: %ii :::.i:• }i: ? •}:i :}:.::.:: ?iii::?
i;i } }i ?
•::::::::::: v: •: u: }: v:::. �: �:y::. �: �':C ? {::::.: A l :.. v: .:.w:::.- :v:v:y:::.: �:. �: :w: :: •i:fii:v::.. ?;.;; •;:
w::. �: w:::. J..,....,: v. _.�iv: •. �.Yiii4} }::iiii }:::::.:: ::::: :.::::::::::w::: :: ::: v:n". : .. ...... ... ..
• ;:`'. ti''.'' i:; i:;:: yi:: i::= is�% i:%:` a:: i:': r:`• i�:% i`:%?': �: �: �: �ii :i::'t�:$:i < %:2 %x`•:':;• {:
ME
,:•ti ": ?::': " ":•? }::::? }:•ii::' ?: ? + >:•:� �iiii.' is
Cost Approach $79,100
Sales Comparison Approach $76,000
Income Approach Not applied
VALUE CONCLUSION $77,500
This conclusion is based upon m personal inspection and review of the subject property,
• P Y P P J P P rtY,
comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process.
Respectfully Submitted,
J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE M ' K Renne, CAE
•
Page 17
REVIEW APPRAISAL
A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION
1. Owner of Property: Kevin P. And M. L. Callahan
2. Location of Property: 5304 Bryant Avenue N., Brooklyn Center, Mn.
3. Appraiser(s): J. Scott Renne and Marri Kunik Renne
4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project
5. Just Compensation: $77,500.00
B. DATA
1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family
2. Zoning: R -2
3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost
• Land value determined by comparable sales.
4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied.
5. Market Approach: Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects
neighborhood. All sales were "Arms Length ".
C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made.
All data appears to be representative of the market for the
subject property. No Adjustments to the Renee's conclusions
were necessary. All calculations and determinations were
considered to be accurate and within applicable standards.
D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and
conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with
applicable standards. No different approaches to value were
deemed necessary.
•
E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the
value of $77,500 (Seventy Seven Thousand, Five
Hundred Dollars) recommended by Mrs. & Mr.
Renees be considered the fair market value for
November 23, 1996.
CERTIFICATION
•
I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Kevin P. And M. L.
Callahan, on this 10th Day of December, 1996 and certify the following statements regarding this
review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge:
1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The
purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes
of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the
property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which
would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with
knowledge and without undue stimulus.
2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as
comparable sales by the appraiser.
I I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein.
4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been
performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and
Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements.
•
5. I have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the
interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other
identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies
and examines the appraisal report reviewed.
Based upon my review of the above - listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in
conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land
and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of November 23,
1996, is recommended at $77,500.00 (Seventy Seven Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars).
SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi G ee ` Review Appraiser . - `� / Date
Witness Date
r
J. Scott Renne, MAI
• 1, Real Estate Appraiser • Consultant • REALTOR
2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408
(612) 871 -1417 FAX (612) 871 -1481 PAGER (612) 66t -3256
December 8, 1996
Brad Hoffman
Community Development Director
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 5307 Camden Avenue
North, Brooklyn Center; Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary
appraisal report
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
Pursuant to your request, We have completed a market value appraisal report of the
above referenced property.
The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple
i interest of the subject property as of December 7, 1996. The report is subject to the
contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report.
The term market value is defined as:
The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to
cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should
sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to
fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self -
interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress.
The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible
property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform
Standards of.Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal
was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report.
The scope of the assignment included:
-
Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and roe on December
Y P l g property rtY r
7, 1996. The tenant, Rob Erickson, accompanied the appraisers on the
inspection. The appraisers received verbal permission from Mae Berglund
• to enter the property. Ms. Berglund is the sister of the property owner and
is reported to have power of attorney in her affairs.
- Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale
• -
Highest and best use analysis
Application of the appraisal process
A general description of legal data is:
P g
- According to Hennepin County records the fee owner is B.E. Hutchinson,
et al.
- The PID is 01- 118 -21- 340019; The legal description is:
The South 59 feet of that part of Lot 9 lying East of West 150 feet thereof, Lot
9, Block 3, Bellvue Acres
- The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $980.02 plus specials of $12.58 for
a total of $992.60 based on an estimated market value of Land $17,000;
Building $50,500; Total $67,500
- According to Hennepin County records the property has not sold within
the past five years.
•
Page 2
Reconciliation
Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the
subject property as of December 7, 1996 is:
'jvtiii: }:;`.: ^ti's ?:i�.'•i iiin {: } ?i{ i'r::: ?' +i
:.v ::::::::::::::: nv::: nv:.v::::.:::::::::.v:::::::: v::: v::::::::::::::: :::::•::::nv::.v::::::::::v:::; } is� ::�::i�iiii:{iv ?:S:yi:;iiti::: i:
..... ......... m :•:::v'r• } ?: {....... i::::::::::::::•r::; ........• };::: • } ?:: } } +' {: "::.. :::w ::v. ..�: }:: v.:...v ??:i •:•' ? %: {•:�? }:•?:6: {:` ? %ti•'r }:i:
: {i;:::::.v::::.v :::::::::::: ::::....::.v::::•............, F'. .,� :::.:•:. . �.:, {.: { {:::::::n... {... }:.{•:: r ? }Y.:v:: -.n . }.:;.. .. ; 5.. ti;:;{v;?i {: }::::.w:•:
.....:: :: .v:::.:�:::::::.: {.:':::: { } }:•: �:•}}}}}}}} } }: ?:4 ?}ii }::iiiti; { : }} } % % } % } } %: �:}; •:::::::: •; .. • ?: . ..:::..w.v:: nv:: w:: n:w?ri� }:•:• }:•ii:4Y; }: °• }:SSC: }::?: { %•n {n.. ...v...:...... ...
.. �......... w:::::::::.:. nv:v. : J }v{.y; v:. ....... .v:v: •::; }:::::::: vvv:: {v :.... ...vv:. • ?::. +vl: v:.: +-.v. •.:v:.
r ............ .:::::.::vn }: ^: ^ }:•}:{• }::::::n ... x. .nh �•. v : : ; . t....n v n.....n., -: h{;: {{..v:. Sv:v:.. rv......
..,..... .. v::v:::::::: ::.v.:v::.v.:v: :: .:: ....:..... v:w: r Y {{•:tii:.:.....titi.......4.r. rvr.:v:::::. ::.v.:::::.::::::.. v........ ...U... ::. .......v.....
.......... v::::::: :..{v:n.w: v {vv::.w.v{v: nv:•; •.::::: :•v:; ..w :w:::: ;•: {w:::•:;;.A:.v: ^. v.•: • }•v. ;{.:::.•i?n::.v:: e:
.. .E ....::::::::: : ..::::::::::.............:.::..:::?::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. vvv {-: iv;{ ? ?•:::::::: }. {w::::::::::.v.,.. n... •; .........• : +.:h::.x
:.vw :; .; ...••.:; ;:...... : ....:::::::::......... +•::::.v:.v :•: - : : .::.;:::::::v �:::::::.v:::::.v:::::: :: ::•: :vvn: ^:::::::::.v : ?:r4 ? }:• } } %n �.. ....:::: vw: ::.:: - v........:.... v.: } } ? ?y: {: }::w:: •.v:.
T::l:: ?:i:i %: iii 'vvi:•'.vi':};:;::;' }ii::$i ��i:: �:;ii::ji% is
Cost Approach $81,800
Sales Comparison Approach $74,500
Income Approach Not applied
VALUE CONCLUSION $76,000
This conclusion is based upon my personal inspection and review of the subject ro e
P P rtY,
comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process.
Respectfully Submitted,
J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE Marri Renne, CAE
•
Page 17
I
• REVIEW APPRAISAL
A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION
1. Owner of Property: Bert E. And Ardella Hutchinson
2. Location of Property: 5307 Camden Avenue N., Brooklyn Center, Mn.
3. Appraiser(s): J. Scott
Renne and Marra Kumk Renne
4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project
5. Just Compensation: $76,000.00
B. DATA
1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family
Y
2. Zoning: R -2
3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost
Land value determined by comparable sales.
4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied.
5. Market Approach: Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects
neighborhood. All sales were "Arms Length ".
• C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made.
All data appears to be representative of the market for the
subject property. No Adjustments to the Renee's conclusions
were necessary. All calculations and determinations were
considered to be accurate and within applicable standards.
D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and
conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with
applicable standards. No different approaches to value were
deemed necessary.
E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the
value of $76,000 (Seventy Six Thousand Dollars)
recommended by Mr. & Mrs. Rennee be
considered the fair market value for December 7,
1996.
• CERTIFICATION
I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Bert E. And Ardella
Hutchinson, on this 10th Day of December, 1996 and certify the following statements regarding
this review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge:
1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The
purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject roe for
PmP 1 property rt3' purposes
of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the
property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which
would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with
knowledge and without undue stimulus.
2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as
comparable sales by the appraiser.
3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein.
4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been
performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and
Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements.
5. I have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the •
interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other
identification establishes just compensation � s o pensation (fair market value) for the property, and identities
and examines the appraisal report reviewed.
Based upon my review of the above - listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in
conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land
and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of December 7,
1996, is recommended at $76,000.00 (Seventy Six Thousand Dollars).
SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi
� Ci
Review Appraiser Date
Witness Date
•
J. Scott Renne, MM
• r Real Estate Appraiser • Consultant • REALTOR
2729 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408
i
(612) 871 -1417 • FAX (612) 871 -1481 • PAGER (612) 661 -3256
December 10, 1996
Brad Hoffman
Community Development Director
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Subject: Market value appraisal of a single family home located at 5301 4th Street North,
Brooklyn Center; Development process, complete appraisal/Report type, summary
appraisal report
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
Pursuant to your request, We have completed a market value appraisal report of the
above referenced property.
The purpose of the appraisal is to arrive at an estimate of market value of the fee simple
interest of the subject property as of December 7, 1996. The report is subject to the
contingent and limiting conditions and certification stated in the report.
The term market value is defined as:
The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to
cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should
sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to
fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self-
interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress.
The function of this assignment was to estimate the value for purposes of a possible
property acquisition. This report was prepared in conformance with the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The development process for this appraisal
was a complete appraisal and the report type is summary appraisal report.
The scope of the assignment included:
Physical inspection of the subject neighborhood and property on December
7, 1996. The owner accompanied the appraisers on the inspection.
• - Survey and analysis of comparable sales and offerings for sale
Hig est and best use analysis
- Application of the appraisal process
A general description of legal data is:
According o Hennepin County records the fee
g p t owner is Kevin L.
Radenbaugh
- The P -
I
ID � O1- 118 -21-43 0072; The legal description is:
Commencing 149.3 feet W of SEC of Lot 10, thence E to SEC of Lot 10,
thence Nly, Lot 10, Block Z Bellvue Acres
- The subject has taxes payable in 1996 of $753.51 plus specials of $9.67 for a
total of $763.18 based on an estimated market value of Land $16,600;
Building $35,300; Total $51,900
According to Hennepin County records the property has not sold within
the past five years.
Page 2
Reconciliation
•
Based on the analysis described in this letter the estimate of the market value for the
subject property as of December 7, 1996 is:
.. ....... ni.......:.:...... k.`.• } }, :i.Y.v... :.... ... ..:. ..v . ....:.:...... .. + v\: i: i:: ya %}}- :. } } }Y:'•:Gi'rv::n. }F:$:iti i:'ri:riRiii} } } } :} }'r ' n,.Yn:.
4Y:fi:::v}::: }: }::....xvv. •4, ? ?•: v. v}n:::.. n•....: ?:••.v : vT. v,: i.`, Lia:? a:•'.:}. \'•:•$Yn ?•.`• } }Y }}T:• }T
.....:::::: n,}. •::: :::.:v. rv::::.yh {•. nv..•:: ,.r• }•.•::.,•.v:::::::.v. . } \::.: v:. ..::.: - , :v.,w::nv::: r:::vi::::...... w:: v: x: nv::::::.y.; ::. }}'+ : ?i•.v:
::v { {:... ., v.:. v ... ;..... . .n. }.::: :• ... .. v. ^v: ••: • ..a ....... ....... }..... ..v. a }................. ...::::::: •vn.. r.. ........... - ::: . •.w: {: '. } }; •. •: nv::; }}..:fi:•} -. }v: • \• }) } }::}) } }.:i }:• } } }i:
...{t .; a.;;.}{.+;:.. .,.::.:•.f.v•}:v•4:. %:•nM vY} }7W :•r.•x •:: Y: n, .•: \w.kx.l'2{ : :?:.�{J::.i• } }i }:a } }n <v. }fi::::: v: m:: navy }.vvi „V.v.:: %v •.vvv.
•}: )'•.• yr :,,. } }. .; .: a'• } }:... a .;{n.:::::F.vv: nv: .. •}K...v..•.
::: •: •.. n.%$.. , ....... x::.v :::: • : •: •. m, .. :na•.vvnv:::n;•:: t:::::.v:: ;.}.; ..: Y::: }:.•::::::: xv w:::::::.
..: .... h:#, ,.. ^� ..., .......,.:. x. ..v.. ..... v .v v: : } ? { ? ? ?a }.. .. v: �:: �'•: ? ?'... v :'.}vi:. }:?: ? {.}}v } }; •. }•CT }n; {n }; fi.tia::::. } }' ?r+ .. a......... .: }.'• \a: avA. :,x,'v • \v:{ k ;:? ..y
., }r.,,Fifi:n ::;•}. {:.T.•::.,.:: ,y }T. , ,�.•., •.:v::;? „f.{ E•: !aa.:... ,,•:::�+c:..: n.., i:,,2a,•:�): w: }~<Tn.: }:::: }•: r: {:.:: �:..a: r;. }:• }x{ {..,i., +: }.: ?; ...,,•::::. r ?:£ ? +.;a:•::i• }:: •:::.`w: .. : a� \. •. , 4.:: r..:
vfi: {.�: ?{fi'fi: +• }}: {•••:4:. v.r.. •:v}. ...? • v .;: y; ::. }: ?- : - } :: ?' • } } },v,• } }Y:::. ...'a. nv +• } %4 n.. n .. \..
�i:v:$: >.:tiv:.'•:':�n::�i': .'•hn.. $.4 . .rk ?•..... •••� $.. a: vv }a .,T }F: {.
1r. •;; { {.}.:•:ti {..: ^: ?::.n..... j n •: m.}. .•:::�' .�..v: •- : \v }}Y}: nvnv: $$� •.v:: }.v: J. : :: v .. .
\n ..3'ti. :. }:: -. ' �.r. a•.:'•: v.a•:
:aa:• }'i la:•Y }:' r).fi: >.•i}:•}:: x...:.n:.
.. ?.. v:v... is a?•?, > ?..:C: {ia }:a� ..4.... r....
.vfi:nvr:•:vY�:: ? {:$$i }):•::: n•..v �. i•�J.V�./�la.' iiiri: v:
::•; ... •:n....vxi.. fiv. .....:: } }: ; {{ ?fi:•Y }}:. } }:• }:•}} :: -::•-: Y }:;: ?: ........ {n,': : { a�}$'?•. v .. %:•:k.• }:::: ?:::$. > •:•'.::Li:
}. n::: rw »:.::a:..av:: n?4:...:,.}..: nnx..,a�. ''. ? . } }:,a. }: n.: }:i•: \• }Yxv:::; % "' fi.4 }:G$ra.. '•::::.:2:::::;•:::3:::3:::::.
aa. w},.. Y.,. an..::.,{', w: v:.✓.• Sna•: :fn,,..,•:.w.,a...,,;.:_hKia} >u �:x.}: ?;: • }: {a }:.:axa} }Y ... - :: ?:., ,. A.;}? �}'.: •r +, <', <2:: <•,••;atir };::::::5:�
. }:•f:i•r•: is • . : ?•x.•:fi;.; {•: {•:x• • y ::.:...::...::.::•YY }•?.•!•.... �. .;v :•r:} }Y••Y: •:
:: :R }'•:: ,t v�7ak:•'•,•:a }:•ri+ :ia :a•; a•• {• \iax'Y }:a$ }:ax•:v ).,a:aa • -: w•ti•Y:Y ,
,•:.xan•:::.,•.a..... n ,. »... r. ?., •},Y, vv:.: :'• •: • •. ' • • xv:.. •. :.v::.v. rx•:v }. Y£'aw.. »v,x!vZ:iii::
• .. Y......., .... � ..... Y..::: }::: .... an .. .....,» ..... }: }Y;;�a}:c• }:•:•> » } }3 {$:a •:. }••T: {•}'aT:• }}: :• }••:::: •..... St; $rT4: }}: }Tx?:�:::.
:}•• Y : {. }T:? {{{.}:;`..T:$;:ia.,..:., :.:vT..•: rr::.:,:•::.: `...a:,•::: .. }:,a•:.t.....:. r'')r• }: ?•.,... , , r:. n„ �. o., a,•'•:: : }:. }Y }' {.ad:}.....a..,...,,... ......,...... ?, :.a a..'a+Y.,:a......,.r.....:•.:. ...ai::;•'.•..a...
.{ . \v, •..a.•kv::::::::::.v:: x:.v \v:.v:nx• v; }$iv:: +.,w::: ::: :}.v: v: }.•.wx. -»vv•:
•}n \•.n..,:: •:.vx +'•:L•{v \a:•nx ,..v \•::: n-•.:av:.x•.w:::: na
, v::: vv.:v: •:: n•:w:.v ,v:,a :..: , w::: x• .n........v.... ... ?...: ti.} :}}.. .
•: 4nv w: "'v }:{Y i{',: �$$:v$:•:a•: n {v: •.v.•. ?::.: n..vxi:.:. .: ..... a..- ..:}.. ... �
.....................�.. -. a....nw::::.... .. n„ w.•::•:. nv:;:}::: v:•::: nv:::::::........::: :•.vnw::::::•:; {: {{:: { }T::,:::: .a•:: ;:.�•.vv........... v..v.n....
Cost Approach $65,900
f. Sales Comparison Approach $64,000
Income Approach Not applied
VALUE CONCLUSION $65
This conclusion i b d review s aced upon my personal inspection an r vi of the subject property,
comparable sales, and application of the appraisal process.
Respectfully Submitted,
J. Scott Renne, MAI, CAE Marri Renne, CAE
•
Page 17
• REVIEW APPRAISAL
A. APPRAISAL IDENTIFICATION
1. Owner of Property: Kevin L. And Fern M. Radenbaugh
2. Location of Property: 5301 4th Street N., Brooklyn Center, Mn.
3. Appraiser(s): J. Scott Renne and Marri Kunik Renne
4. Project: 53rd Avenue Project
5. Just Compensation: $65,000.00
B. DATA
1. Highest and Best Use: R -1 Single Family
2. Zoning: R -2
3. Cost Approach: Utilized Marshall and Swift Residential Building Cost
Land value determined by comparable sales.
4. Income Approach: Considered but not applied.
5. Market Approach: Standard method using five comparable sales in the subjects
neighborhood. Four sales were "arms- length" and one utilized
a sale to a government agency but in the immediate proximity
To the subject. Note should be made in the appraisal of the
government sale.
C . ANALYSIS OF DATA: A complete review of all data contained in this report was made.
All data appears to be representative of the market for the
subject property. No Adjustments to the Renee's conclusions
were necessary. All calculations and determinations were
considered to be accurate and within applicable standards.
Note should be made of the government sale in the appraisal.
D. ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY: All of the appraiser's methods, judgements, and
conclusions appear to be valid and in conformity with
applicable standards. No different approaches to value were
deemed necessary.
E. RECOMMENDATION OF VALUE: It is the conclusion of the review appraiser that the
value of $65,000 (Sixty Five Thousand Dollars)
recommended by Mr. & Mrs. Renne be
considered the fair market value for December 7,
1996.
•
CERTIFICATION
I have reviewed the appraisal listed below for the property owned by Kevin L. And Fern M.
Radenbaugh, on this 12th Day of December, 1996 and certify the following statements regarding
this review to be true and complete to the best of my knowledge:
1. I have made a complete review of the above - referenced appraisal for the subject property. The
purpose of this review is to recommend the fair market value of the subject property for purposes
of establishing a reasonable acquisition price. Fair market value is defined as the price which the
property will bring in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, which
would result from negotiations between a buyer and a seller, each acting prudently, with
knowledge and without undue stimulus.
2. I have made an exterior inspection of the subject property and of all parcels used as
comparable sales by the appraiser.
3. I am not aware of any unlawful occupancy of the property appraised and reviewed herein.
4. I believe that the work of the appraiser(s) with respect to the subject property has been
performed in a competent manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Act, and
Department of Housing and Urban Development policies and requirements.
5. I have prepared the attached written report, which delineates the subject property and the
interest to be acquired therein, identifies the property by name of owner, parcel number or other
identification, establishes just compensation (fair market value) for the property, and identifies
and examines the appraisal report reviewed.
Based upon my review of the above - listed appraisal and any other pertinent data and in
conjunction with the established policy and regulations, the FAIR MARKET VALUE of land
and improvements (other than those listed in a separate fixture appraisal) as of December 7,
1996, is recommended at $65,000.00 (Sixty Five Thousand Dollars).
SIGNED: Joseph J. DaBruzzi�
Review Appraiser Date
Witness Date
r
PURCHASE AGREEMENT
This Purchase Agreement is made 1 199 If
by and between ,and
(collectively referred to as "Seller ")
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN
CENTER, (EDA) a public body corporate and politic under the laws
of Minnesota, located at 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn
Center, MN 55430 ( "Buyer ").
RtorirAls
A. Seller is the owner of that certain real estate located
at _ City of Brooklyn'Center, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, legally described as:
together with all improvements thereon (the "Property ").
B. Buyer desires to acquire the Property by voluntary sale
in fee simple absolute.
C. Seller agrees to sell the Property to Buyer.
Aar PmPn
In consideration of the mutual agreements made herein,
Seller and Buyer agree as follows:
1. Offer /A c,= anza Buyer agrees to purchase and Seller
agrees to sell the Property under the terms and conditions stated
in this Agreement. Seller is being allowed, as part of this
Agreement, to remove the personal property more fully described
in the attached Bill of Sale. with the exception of said
described items, the sale contemplated by this agreement includes
all fixtures and improvements on the property, including storm
widows and inserts, storm doors, screens, awnings, window shades,
blinds, curtain /traverse /drapery rods, attached lighting fixtures
with bulbs, plumbing fixtures, sump pumps, water heaters, heating
systems, built -in appliances, water softeners, garbage disposals,
installed carpeting, work benches, television antennas and hood
fans. Upon delivery of the deed, Sellers shall also deliver a
Bill of Sale for the above personal property.
2. Fllrrhasp Prirc The purchase price for the Property
shall be
($ ) and shall be payable as follows:
i2i'i2 /1990 12:39 oi25666311 EVERGREEN LAND SEKV PAGE 03
S a. ($ ) as earnest
money, payable upon EDA execution of this
agreement.
b. The balance of the Purchase Price in cash or
by certified funds or the equivalent on the
Closing Date (as hereafter defined).
The Buyer, in its discretion and in partial payment of the
purchase price, may assume or take title subject to any existing
indebtedness encumbering the Subject Property, in which case the
cash to be paid at the time of closing shall be reduced by the
then remaining indebtedness.
3. Mark tahility of Title The Seller shall, on or prior
to the date of this Purchase Agreement, deliver to the Buyer all
unrecorded instruments relating to interests in the Subject
Property, and an abstract of title or registered property
abstract, as applicable. The Buyer shall, at its cost, have the
abstract certified to a current date or, if necessary, have a
registered property abstract prepared. After the date of
delivery of the abstract or registered property abstract or the
date of this Agreement, whichever is later, the Buyer shall have
up to twenty (20) days for the examination thereof, and to
deliver written objections, if any, to the Seller. Seller shall
have 30 days after receipt of Buyer's written objections to make
title marketable.
a. If the Seller proceeds in good faith to make title
marketable but fails to do so within the 30 day period,
Buyer may terminate this ate t s A reement w'
i Y Y g without any liability on
its art and Seller shall p e s a promptly refund to Buyer the
Earnest Money paid.
b. If Seller fails to make title marketable within
the 30 day period due to Seller's failure to proceed in good
faith, or, if title is marketable but Seller defaults in its
obligations under this Agreement, Buyer may seek any of the
following remedies permitted under law: (i) terminate this
Agreement by notice to Seller, in which event the Seller
shall refund to Buyer the Earnest Money paid; or (ii) seek
specific performance of this Agreement.
C. If title is marketable or is corrected within the
30 day period and Buyer defaults in any of the agreements
herein, Seller may terminate this Agreement and retain all
payments made under this Agreement as liquidated damages.
The termination period for a Notice of Cancellation of this
Agreement shall be 30 days as permitted by Minnesota
Statutes, Section 559.21, subd. 4.
12/121/ 1 12:39 612666811 EVERGREEN LAND EERV PAGE 04
d. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, Buyer retains the right to initiate condemnation
proceedings against the subject property to assure timely
acquisition.
4. Conditions to CInsing The closing of the transaction
contemplated by this Agreement and the obligation of the Buyer to
purchase the Property shall be subject to the following
conditions:
a. Buyer shall have determined on or before the
Closing Date that it is satisfied, based upon the results of
and matters disclosed by any environmental or soil
investigations or testing of the property, that there are no
environmental or soil conditions that would materially
affect the value of the Property or that would interfere
with Buyer's proposed use of the Property for residential
redevelopment purposes. Buyer and Seller each acknowledge
that environmental contamination of any kind would interfere
with Buyer's proposed use of the Property.
b. Buyer shall have reviewed and approved title to
the property pursuant to Paragraph 3 of this Agreement.
5. F.nvironmPn_al and Soil Tnvestigat Buyer and its
agents shall have the right, at its sole option and risk, to
enter the Property for the purpose of testing soils, testing for
asbestos containing materials, surveying, or doing such other
work as may be necessary to determine the suitability of the
Property for uses by the Buyer. If Buyer investigates and tests
the Property pursuant to this section, Buyer shall pay all costs
and expenses of such investigation and testing. Upon request of
Buyer, Seller shall also permit Buyer to review all environmental
reports and files, if any, relating to the Property and in
Seller's possession_
6. Real Fst - atp Tax A . On or before the Closing Date,
Seller will pay all delinquent real estate taxes, penalties and
interest, if any. Real estate taxes payable in the year of
closing will be prorated between Buyer and Seller as of the
Closing Date. Seller warrants that real estate taxes payable in
199 are (homestead)(non - homestead).
7. slaprial Assessments On or before the Closing Date,
Seller will pay all installments of special assessments certified
for payment with real estate taxes payable in the year of
• closing. Seller will pay on the Closing Date all other special
assessments levied as of the date of this Agreement and
assessments, if any, pending as of the Closing Date. Seller's
12/12/1996 12:39 6125666811 EVERGREEN LAND SERV PAGE 05
. provision for payment of pending assessments shall be by payment
into escrow of 1.5 times the estimated amount of the assessments.
Deferred Asp ssm nts and Taxes Seller shall pay on
date of closing any deferred real estate taxes or special
assessments payment of which is required as a result of the
closing of this sale.
8. Closing Da e . The closing shall take place at a
location designated by Buyer on , 199
9. Documanta to bA Delivered at- Cloaing On the Closing
Date, Buyer shall deliver to Seller the balance of the purchase
Price and Seller shall deliver to Buyer:
a. A duly executed general warranty deed, conveying
marketable title to the Property to Buyer, subject only
to: (i) building and zoning laws, ordinances, state and
federal regulations; (ii) utility and drainage
easements which do not interfere with Buyer's intended
use of the property; (iii) reservation of any minerals
or mineral rights to the State of Minnesota.
b. A duly executed affidavit of Seller.
C. A receipt evidencing payment of real estate taxes for
which payment was due prior to the Closing Date.
d. All documents necessary to establish marketable title
to Buyer.
10. Closinq Costs Buyer shall pay all expenses of
examination of title and recording of the Seller's warranty deed.
Buyer shall also pay state deed tax. Seller shall pay all
recording fees and charges relating to the obtaining of and
filing of instruments required to make title marketable.
11. TIt*JlitieI; Seller shall be responsible for payment of
all utilities and insurance premiums through the date of closing
or date of vacation, whichever is later
12. Covenants, ReprPs nta ionG and WarraDtips of SP1lp r
a. The signatories to this Agreement represent that they
are the fee owners of the Property and are authorized
to execute this Agreement.
b. Seller warrants that it will take no actions to
encumber title to the Property after the date of this
Agreement and that it will indemnify and hold the Buyer
harmless against any liens or encumbrances established
in violation of this provision.
��. �'- .•�•v ��• •� via. .J00001� � �.Vi[C�It 1_. -tivL �G![V - -. -i�7G UO
• C.
Seller warrants that it has not used the Property for
the storage of hazardous substances or petroleum
products and, as of the date of this Agreement, is not
aware of any facts the existence of which would
constitute a violation of any local, state or federal
environmental law, regulation or review procedure, or
which would give any person a valid claim under the
Minnesota Environmental Rights Act or the federal
Comprehensive Environmental response, Compensation and
Liability Act.
d. Seller warrants that there has been no labor or
material furnished to the Property for which payment
has not been made.
e. Seller warrants that there are no present violations of
any restrictions relating to the use or improvement of
the Property.
f. The warranties made in this paragraph shall survive
closing without merger in the deed.
13. Covenants Representat-ionS, and Wa ran i s of Ryyor
Buyer is the EDA in and for the City of Brooklyn Center under the
laws of the State of Minnesota and has the power to enter into
this Agreement and to carry out its obligations hereunder. The
signatories to this Agreement represent that they are authorized
to execute this Agreement on Buyer's behalf.
14. No Rro ker TnvoivPd The Seller and Buyer represent and
warrant to each other that there is no broker involved in this
transaction with whom it has negotiated or to whom it has agreed
to pay a broker commission or finder's fee in connection with
negotiations for the sale of the Property.
15. Possession and Insurance Seller shall deliver
possession of the Property to Buyer on the Closing Date in the
same condition as exists on the date of this Agreement, with the
exception of removal of the items described in paragraph 1
hereof. Risk of loss from casualty or any liability incurred by
or as a result of the use or contact with the Property shall be
the Seller's until delivery of possession to the Buyer as herein
provided.
16. Personal Proems on the date when possession is
transferred to Buyer, the Seller shall have removed from the
Property any and all personal property belonging to him which is
not included in this sale. Any personal property which is not
removed by the date of transfer of possession shall be considered
abandoned. The Seller agrees to indemnify and hold the Buyer
harmless for all costs incurred in disposing of personal property
12:12;1596 12:35 612666811 EVERGREEN LAND SERV PAGE 07
left in or at the Property by the Seller after the date of
transfer of possession.
17. Removal of Hazardous Mat_ al Seller, prior to
vacation of the Property, shall remove all substances which,
under state or federal law, must be disposed of at an approved
disposal facility. This includes, but is not limited to, used
oil, paints, solvents, fertilizers, poisons, and the like.
18. Relocation Costs The Buyer acknowledges that any
responsibility to pay relocation costs and benefits in accordance
with Minnesota Sta G , Chapter 117, is a separate obligation,
no part of which is reflected in the purchase price contained in
paragraph 2 above.
19. Well M sr1asure Buyer acknowledges, to the extent
applicable, receipt of a well disclosure statement from Seller,
attached as Exhibit A to this Agreement.
20. Disr1 0,tmr ; Tndiyidual Sewage Treatment System-
Sellers disclose that there (is) (is not) an individual sewage
treatment system on or serving the Property. If there is an
individual sewage treatment system on or serving the Property,
Sellers disclose that the system (is) (is not) in use, and
Sellers further disclose that the type of system is a
system and the location is shown on the map
attached as Exhibit B to this Purchase Agreement.
21. Entire Agreement; Am n m n s This Agreement
represents the complete and final agreement of the parties and
supersedes any prior or contemporaneous oral or written
understanding between the parties. This Agreement may be amended
only in writing, signed by both parties.
22. Binding F • Assicr montt This Purchase Agreement
shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective
heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. Each
party agrees to give the other party notice prior to assigning
its interest in the Property or this Agreement.
23. Nom Any notice, demand, request or other
communication which may or shall be given or served to or on
Seller by Buyer or to or on Buyer by Seller shall be deemed to
have been given or served on the date the same is deposited in
the United States mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid
and addressed as follows:
12i12ii9y6 13:07 6125666811 EVERGREEN LAND SERV PAGE 02
(1) If to Seller:
(2) If to Buyer: Thomas R. Bublitz
Community Development Specialist
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 55443
23. Specific Performanre This Purchase Agreement may be
specifically enforced by the Buyer.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this
Agreement to be executed on the date written above.
BUYER SELLERS:
Economic Development Authority
in and for the City of
Brooklyn Center
• By.
Michael J. McCauley
Executive Director
C:we[b /..4. /3f N/ SOMM /.t.OtM
•
AM F orm No. 1515 -W u�w ,..q. w.i� Inch
MINNESOTA WELL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
• Minnesota Law requires that before signing in
an agreement to sell or transfer real June 30, 1990, the seller must disclose information in writing to the buyer about he status a an
location of all known wells on the property. This requirement is satisfied by delivering to the buyer
either a statement by the seller that the seller does not know of any wells on the property, or a
disclosure statement indicating the legal description and county and a map showing the location
of each well In the disclosure statement the seller must indicate, for each well, whether the well is
in use, not in use or sealed.
A seller who fails to disclose the existence of a well at the time of sale and knew of, or had reason
to know of, the existence of a well is liable to the buyer for costs relating to the sealing of the well
and reasonable attorney fees for collection of costs from the seller, if the action is commenced within
six Yeas after the date the buyer closed the purchase of the real property where the well is located.
Instructions for completion of this form are on the reverse side.
I. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Street address:
Cky C—ty
2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION
3. WELL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
(Check the appropriate box.)
0 The seller certifies that the seller does not know of any wells on the above described real
property.
If this option is checked, then skip to the last line and sign and date this statement.
0 The seller certifies that the following wells are located on the above described real property.
MN. Unique Well Year of Well IN USE NOT IN SEALED
Well No. Depth Const. Type USE
Well 1 D 0
Well 2 0 0 0
Well 3 0 0 C
4. SEALED WELL INFORMATION
For each well designated as sealed above, complete this section.
When was the well sealed?
Who sealed the well?
Was a Sealed Well Report filed with the Minnesota Department of Health? Yes No
5. MAP
Complete the attached map showing the location of each well on the real property.
6. CERTIFICATION BY SELLER
I certify that the information provided above is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge.
• 8rlr a aota•ud R.gr..ieuu.. Wu
8.�r � Dsputtl A.ge�etauw
a�
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE WELL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
DEFINITION
A "well" means an excavation that is drilled, cored. bored, washed, driven, dug, jetted. or
. otherwise constructed if the excavation is intended for the location, diversion, artificial
recharge, or acquisition of groundwater.
MINNESOTA UNIQUE WELL NUMBER
All new wells constructed AFTER January 1, 1975 should have been assigned a Minnesota
unique well number by the person constructing the well. If the well was constructed after this
date you should have the unique well number in your property records. If you are unable to
locate your unique well number and the well was constructed AFTER January 1. 1975, contact
your well contractor. If no unique well number is available, please indicate the depth and year
of construction for each well
WELL TYPE
Use one of the following terms to describe the well type.
WATER WELL A water well is any type of well used to extract groundwater for
private or public use. Examples of water wells are: domestic wells, drive-point wells, dug
wells, remedial wells, and municipal wells.
IRRIGATION WELL An irrigation well is a well used to irrigate agricultural lands.
These are typically large diameter wells connected to a large pressure distribution system.
MONITORING WELL A monitoring well is a well used to monitor groundwater
contamination. The well is typically used to access groundwater for the extraction of
samples.
DEWATERING WELL A dewatering well is a well used to lower groundwater levels
to allow for construction or use of underground spaces.
INDUSTRIALCOMMERCLAL WELL An industrial/commercial well is a nonpotable
well used to extract groundwater for any nonpotable use including groundwater thermal
thermal exchange wells (heat pumps and heat loops).
WELL USE STATUS
Indicate the use status of each well. CHECK ONLY 1 BOX PER WELL.
IN USE A well is "in use" if the well is producing sufficient water to meet its intended
use and is being operated on a regular basis.
NOT IN USE A well is "not in use" if the well is inoperable and not in use or the well is
disconnected from a power supply and is not sealed.
SEALED A well is "sealed "if the well has been sealed by a licensed contractor and there
is a Sealed Well Retort on the at the Minnesota Department of Health. A properly sealed
well has been sealed by a licensed contractor by pumping grout throughout the entire
borehole from the bottom of the well
NOTE: If a well is inoperable and not in use or disconnected from a power source, it
must be sealed by a licensed well contractor or a well owner must obtain a maintenance
permit from the Minnesota Department of Health and pay an annual maintenance fee. If a
well is operable and properly maintained, a maintenance permit is not required.
• Commissioner introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
EDA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION, ESTABLISHING OFFER OF
JUST COMPENSATION, AUTHORIZING NEGOTIATION AND EXECUTION
OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT, AUTHORIZING PAYMENT FOR
ACQUISITION, CLOSING COSTS AND RELOCATION CLAIMS FOR
VARIOUS PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE 53RD AVENUE
DEVELOPMENT AND LINKAGE PROJECT
WHEREAS, EDA Resolution No. 96 -214 directed the Economic Development
Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center ( "Brooklyn Center EDA ") to administer and
execute the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project, including administration and
execution of all project activities; and
WHEREAS, the following properties to be acquired are included in the 53rd
Avenue Development and Linkage Project area:
710 -53rd Avenue North
• 806 -53rd Avenue North
5309 Camden Avenue North
5306 Bryant Avenue North
5311 -4th Street North
706 -53rd Avenue North
818 -53rd Avenue North
5304 Bryant Avenue North
5307 Camden Avenue North
5301 -4th Street North
WHEREAS, the EDA wishes to provide a procedure for acquiring the above -
described properties by negotiated purchase when possible; and
WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center EDA has reviewed the following items relative
to the appraisals of the real property located at the addresses listed in paragraph 2 above: (a)
appraisal reports; (b) review appraisals; and
WHEREAS, the fair market values of the real property located at the addresses
listed above have been established by the appraisal and review appraisal for each property; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Brooklyn Center EDA to present offers to the
owners of the properties listed above based on the appraisal and review appraisals completed on
the properties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development
Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center as follows:
• EDA RESOLUTION NO.
1. The appraisal and review appraisal documents referenced in paragraph 4 for the
following properties are hereby accepted and the fair market values, as
established by the appraisal and review appraisals, are hereby established as
just compensation for the following properties as follows:
Property Address Appraised Value
710 -53rd Avenue North $50,100
806 -53rd Avenue North $55,200
5309 Camden Avenue North $66,100
5306 Bryant Avenue North $58,900
5311 -4th Street North $71,300
706 -53rd Avenue North $52,500
818 -53rd Avenue North $79,000
5304 Bryant Avenue North $77,500
5307 Camden Avenue North $76,000
5301 -4th Street North $65,000
2. The Brooklyn Center EDA Executive Director is hereby authorized to make a
. written offer in the amount of the appraised value to the owners of the real
property listed in paragraph 1 above for the acquisition of the property.
3. The EDA Executive Director is hereby authorized to negotiate and execute
purchase agreements on behalf of the Brooklyn Center Economic Development
Authority for the properties listed in paragraph 1 above in the amount
determined by the appraisal and review appraisal ( "Appraised Value "), in
accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended ( "Uniform Relocation Act "),
regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, and pursuant to the purchase
agreement form attached.
4. In cases in which the owners of the properties described in paragraph 1 above
do not agree to the sale of such properties for the Appraised Value, the EDA
Executive Director shall attempt to negotiate with such owners a purchase
agreement acceptable to the landowner and secure the execution of such
purchase agreement by the owner, which purchase agreement shall be
submitted for approval to the EDA Board of Commissioners.
5. Claims for relocation benefits required by the Uniform Relocation Act duly
submitted and in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Relocation
Act may be approved by the EDA Executive Director and paid in accordance
• with the City purchasing policy.
• EDA RESOLUTION NO.
Date President
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by commissioner
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
•
Memorandum
To: Michael J. McCauley, EDA Executive Director
From: Tom Bublitz, Community Development Specialist/
Date: December 11, 1996
Subject: Resolution Approving Form of Occupancy Agreement for 53rd Avenue
Development and Linkage Project and Approving Schedule of Values for Various
Salvage Items From the Properties in the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage
Project
At the initial neighborhood meeting held on September 12, 1996, to introduce the 53rd Avenue
Development and Linkage Project, one of the major issues of concern to homeowners moving
from their homes was their ability to stay in the home until the end of the school year. At the
September 12 meeting, residents were assured they could remain in their homes through the end
of the current school year.
In response to those households choosing to stay in their homes through the end of the current
school year, the attached Occupancy Agreement has been prepared. It is the identical agreement
• used by the City in the Park & Ride and 69th Avenue projects.
The Occupancy Agreement would be used by Evergreen Land Services Company when they
negotiate the purchase agreement for properties. The proposed vacation date for properties in the
53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project area would be June 30, 1996. I would
recommend owners and tenants be allowed to remain in the homes and apartments rent -free
through the June 30 date.
Another minor item that has come up in the course of discussing the acquisitions with property
owners is the issue of homeowners salvaging certain items from their properties such as water
heaters, water softeners, furnaces, ceiling fans, air conditioning units, etc. Based on past
experience, Evergreen Land Services Company has recommended that some nominal cost to the
homeowner be charged for any items salvaged prior to closing. This schedule of salvage costs
could be used by Evergreen Land Services Company when they begin acquisition discussions
with homeowners. Staff has prepared a proposed Schedule of Salvage Costs for this purpose,
and it is attached to this memorandum. The salvage costs would be deducted from the
homeowners' final payout at closing.
The EDA resolution attached to this memorandum would approve the form of the Occupancy
Agreement and the Schedule of Salvage Costs.
Commissioner introduced the following resolution and
• moved its adoption:
EDA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING FORM OF OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT FOR
53RD AVENUE DEVELOPMENT AND LINKAGE PROJECT AND
APPROVING SCHEDULE OF VALUES FOR VARIOUS SALVAGE ITEMS
FROM THE PROPERTIES IN THE 53RD AVENUE DEVELOPMENT AND
LINKAGE PROJECT
WHEREAS, Council Resolution No. 96-214 directed the Economic Development
Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center ( "Brooklyn Center EDA ") to administer and
execute the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project, including administration and
execution of all project activities; and
WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center EDA is responsible for all property acquisitions
in the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Brooklyn Center EDA to allow homeowners and
tenants displaced by the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage Project to remain in the homes
acquired by the EDA through the end of the current school year; and
•
WHEREAS, an agreement has been prepared to provide for the continued
occupancy of the acquired properties by homeowners and tenants beyond the date of closing
through the end of the current school year; and
WHEREAS, some homeowners have expressed an interest in salvaging certain
household fixtures and items; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the EDA to allow homeowners to salvage certain
household fixtures and items; and
WHEREAS, a Schedule of Salvage Costs has been prepared to facilitate the
salvaging of specific household fixtures and items by homeowners.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development
Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center as follows:
1. The terms of the Occupancy Agreement attached to this resolution are hereby
approved.
2. The vacation date for properties in the 53rd Avenue Development and Linkage
Project shall be no later than June 30, 1997.
EDA RESOLUTION NO.
3. The Schedule of Salvage Costs attached to this resolution is hereby approved,
and any items salvaged from the homes acquired in the 53rd Avenue
Development and Linkage Project shall be done so according to the Schedule
of Salvage Costs, and said costs shall be deducted from the final payout for the
acquisition of the property at closing.
Date President
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by commissioner
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT
THIS OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT entered into this - day of ,
1 996, by and between ( "Sellers ") and the Economic
Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center ( "Buyer ").
RECITALS
1. Sellers and Buyer have entered into a Purchase Agreement for the sale of
, Hennepin County, Minnesota ( "Subject Property ")
dated , 1996 (the "Purchase Agreement ").
2. The Purchase Agreement provides for delivery of possession of the Subject Property on
the date of closing.
3. The arties desire to close the sale of the Subject Property p b� op rty on ,
1996, and deliver possession on or before
AGREEMENT
The parties agree as follows:
1. Delivery of Possession. Sellers shall deliver possession of the Subject Property to Buyer
on or before , 1996. Seller shall give Buyer at least seven
(7) days written notice prior to vacating the Subject Property.
2. Rent. Sellers may occupy the Subject Property through , 1996,
without paying rent to Buyers
3. No Damage. Sellers agree not to cause damage to the Subject Property or to any structure
located on the Subject Property and agree to deliver possession of the Subject Property to
the Buyer in substantially the same condition as existed on ,
1996.
4. Utility Bills. Sellers agree to pay for all utility services to the Subject Property through
the last day of their occupancy. Utility services include the following: sewer and water,
electricity, gas, telephone, garbage collection and cable television.
5. Insurance. Sellers agree to obtain comprehensive personal liability insurance coverage
in the minimum amount of $100,000 naming the Economic Development Authority in and
for the City of Brooklyn Center as an additional insured party. The policy must be kept
in force through the last date of occupancy on the Subject Property.
•
6. Uninsured Damages. Sellers are responsible for any and all damages that may occur
• to the Subject Property before the last date of occupancy that are not covered by
insurance.
7. Removal of Personal Property. Sellers are responsible for the removal of all
personal belongings from the Subject Property before the delivery of possession of
the Subject Property to the Buyer.
SELLERS: BAR
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN
CENTER
•
• -2-
• SCHEDULE OF CHARGES
FOR SALVAGE ITEMS
53RD AVENUE DEVELOPMENT AND LINKAGE PROJECT
ITEM SALVAG COST TO OWN
Furnace $100
Water Heater $50
Water Softener $50
Central Air Conditioning Unit $100
Ceiling Fan $25
Miscellaneous fixtures (fireplace manels,
cabinets, vanities, etc., to be negotiated)
*Cost of item(s) will be deducted from payout to owner at closing.
•
•
J �
Memorandum
To: Michael J. McCauley, City Manager
From: Brad Hoffman, Community Development Specialist
Date: December 11, 1996
Subject: Resolution Approving Modifications No. 1 and No. 2 to the Tax Increment
Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 and Requesting the
Approval of the City Council
Both the EDA and the City Council will be asked to consider modifications to TIF District No. 3.
In brief, the modifications would remove six parcels from the district. The six parcels to be
removed have had significant reductions in value since the inception of the district. These same
six parcels would then be reinstated into the TIF district. The result of the actions would be to
reduce the base value of the district to reflect the current market values of the properties in
question.
At the time the district was established, a base value, or total market value of the property in the
• district was set. The base value represents one of the "lines" of sorts upon which TIF is
determined. TIF is based upon additional value above the base value. Also, at the time the
district was established, the current tax rate was set. TIF is determined by the set tax rate times
the next tax capacity above the base value. TIF does not capture increases in tax rate.
The parcels to be removed and reinstated have lost over $20,000,000 in value since the district
was established. That means there would have to be $20,000,000 in new value added to the
district before any TIF monies would be generated. If Brooklyn Center is going to undertake a
redevelopment role in Brookdale or other areas of the city, we need to address this problem.
This TIF district represents the primary and only viable financial tool to address many of the
concerns expressed by the community.
On Monday evening, City staff and Springsted will attend the City Council meeting to discuss
this proposal and answer questions.
•
Commissioner introduced the following resolution and
• moved its adoption:
EDA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFICATIONS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 TO THE
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICT NO. 3 AND REQUESTING THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY
COUNCIL
BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority in and for the City
of Brooklyn Center (the "EDA ") as follows:
1. Proposed Modification In order to finance the public redevelopment costs
to be incurred by the EDA and the City of Brooklyn Center (the "City") in connection with
Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Redevelopment Project "), a
housing development and redevelopment project established by the EDA pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Section 469.001 to 469.047, as amended, and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to
469.108, as amended, the EDA has approved Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment
Financing District No. 3, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175 (the
"Financing Plan"), which establishes Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 (the "District ") as
a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 469.174, Subdivision
9. It has been proposed that the EDA approve Modification No. 1 and Modification No. 2 (the
"Modifications ") to the Financing Plan.
2. Approval of Modifications The Modifications have been presented to the
EDA and are ordered placed on file in the office of the Executive Director of the EDA, and the
Modifications are hereby approved. The Modifications further serve the original goals and
purposes of the City and EDA in approving the Redevelopment Projects and the Financing Plan.
3. Presentation to Cily Council The Modifications hereby approved shall be
presented to the City Council for a public hearing thereon pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section
469.029, Subdivision 6, and Section 469.175, Subdivision 4.
Date President
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by commissioner
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof:
. and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
Memorandum
To: Michael J. McCauley, EDA Executive Director
From: Brad Hoffman, Community Development Director -�
Date: December 11, 1996
Subject: Resolution Awarding Contract for Carpet Replacement at the Earle Brown
Heritage Center
The carpet at the Earle Brown Heritage Center is the original carpet. It is six years old and is
showing the wear from all of the traffic generated by events at the Center. It is in need of
replacement and has been the subject of comments from potential customers.
On Monday evening, EDA will be asked t
Y sk o approve the purchase of 1 440 square g PP p and of Y
q
carpet from Barbara Leonard, Inc., in the amount of $52,723.10. Barbara Leonard, Inc., holds
the State contract for carpet replacement, which means that the company has gone through a
public bidding process. Municipalities and other governmental agencies are authorized to buy
off of State contracts.
• As a check, a quote was also obtained from Pink Companies. Their written quote was
$52,931.50, or $148.40 more than Barbara Leonard, Inc.
•
Commissioner introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
EDA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CARPET REPLACEMENT AT
THE EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER
WHEREAS, Barbara Leonard, Inc., holds the State contract for carpet replacement;
and
WHEREAS, Barbara Leonard, Inc., has submitted a proposal to do the work under
the State contract at the Earle Brown Heritage Center; and
WHEREAS, the EDA Board has determined that $50,000 of operating revenues
from the 1996 operations are to be used for capital purchases in 1997 at the Earle Brown Heritage
Center; and
WHEREAS, the proposal under the State contract for this project is $52,783.10.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development
Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center that the carpet replacement and installation in
• the Exhibit Hall in the sum of $52,783.10 be and hereby is approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that $50,000 in operating revenues in excess of
operating expenses for the calendar year 1996 for the Earle Brown Heritage Center be carried
forward and used to defray $50,000 of the cost of the capital expenditure for carpet replacement.
Date President
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by commissioner
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
EDA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL BROOKLYN CENTER ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 1997 PURSUANT
TO MSA CHAPTER 469.107, SUBDIVISION 1
WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority has considered
the final budget and finds that this budget is necessary for the operation of the Brooklyn Center
Economic Development Authority during the year 1997; and
WHEREAS, there is within the Economic Development Authority the amount of
$1,000,000 from the abolition f
n the dedicated housing ccount which is available g e to spend on
projects in 1997; and
WHEREAS, there remains in the Economic Development Authority accounts the
amount of $1,630,785 of roceed
s from the General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, , Series
g
1995A which is available to spend on projects during 1997.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development
• Authority for the City of Brooklyn Center as follows:
1. that the final budget of the Economic Development Authority for said City is hereby
approved and shall be:
ESTIMATED REVENUES:
General Property Taxes $173,750
Intergovernmental Revenue CDBG 258,971
I.D.R.B. Fees 17,000
Investment Earnings 105,000
Transfer from H.R.A. Fund 139.483
Total Revenue by Source $694,204
APPROPRIATIONS:
Redevelopment $3,066,018
CDBG programs 258.971
Total Appropriations $3,324,989
2. that a copy of this resolution be submitted to the City Council of the City of Brooklyn
Center.
RESOLUTION NO.
•
Date President
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
• its adoption:
EDA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TO LEVY
TAXES FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE YEAR 1997
WHEREAS, Minnesota statutes currently require certification to the Hennepin
County Auditor of a final tax levy on or before December 27, 1996.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development
Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center as follows:
Section 1: That the Economic Development Authority requests the City of
Brooklyn Center to levy a property tax for the benefit of the Economic Development Authority,
for the year 1997 at a rate not to exceed 0.01813 % of taxable property, real and personal, situated
within the corporate limits of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota and not exempted by the
Constitution of the State of Minnesota or the valid laws of the State of Minnesota, for the purpose
of maintaining the E.D.A. Special Operating Fund pursuant to MSA Chapter 469.107,
Subdivision 1.
Section 2: The City of Brooklyn Center will include the Economic Development
Authority's tax levy for the year 1997 in the City of Brooklyn Center's certification to the
Hennepin County Auditor of a final tax levy to on or before December 27, 1996.
Date President
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.