Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 05-13 PCP &r- • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER May 13, 2004 REGULAR SESSION 1. Call to Order: 7:30 p.m. 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes - April 29, 2004 4. Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 5. Frauenshuh Companies 2004 -007 • Request for a Planned Unit Development amendment to construct a 4,195 sq. ft. Dairy Queen Grill and Chill in the north parking lot of Brookdale Center. 6. Other Business 7. Adjoununent r Application Filed on 4 -15 -04 • City Council Action Should Be Taken By 6 -14 -04 (60 Days) Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 2004 -007 Applicant: Frauenshuh Companies Location: Brookdale Center - North Parking Lot Request: Planned Unit Development Amendment The applicant, Frauenshuh Companies, is seeking a Planned Unit Development Amendment to construct a 4,195 sq. ft. Dairy Queen Grill and Chill in the north parking lot of Brookdale Center. The site is legally described at Tract C, RLS 1710, (proposed to be addressed as 1150 Brookdale Center) and is located between the Midas Muffler/Precision Tune site and the Northway Drive /County Road 10 entrance to Brookdale. The property in question is zoned PUD /C -2 (Planned Unit Development/Commerce) and is bounded on the north by County Road 10; on the west by the Midas Muffler /Precision Tune site; on the south by the Brookdale perimeter road with the Mervyn's parking lot on the opposite side of the road; and on the east by the Northway Drive /County Road 10 entrance to Brookdale. A Planned Unit Development Rezoning from C -2 (Commerce) to PUD /C -2 and development plan approval for the expansions, redevelopment and rejuvenation of Brookdale Center was • approved by the City Council under Resolution No. 99 -37 on March 8, 1999. Attached for the Commission's review is a copy of that resolution containing the various findings and conditions of approval for that proposal (Planning Commission Application No. 99001). Condition No. 15 of that approval acknowledged conceptual approval for three other out buildings located around the perimeter of the shopping center. This particular site was labeled on the approved site plan (attached) as Building No. 2 and comprehended a 10,000 sq. ft. retail/restaurant building. Planning Commission review and City Council approval, in the form of a Planned Unit Development Amendment is required to be obtained prior to the issuance of building permits for this particular building. This application is in response to that condition of approval. As the Commission is aware, the PUD process involves a rezoning of land to the PUD designation followed by an alpha- numeric designation of the underlying zoning district. This underlying zoning district provides the regulations governing uses and structures within the Planned Unit Development. The rules and regulations governing that district (in this case C -2) would apply to the development proposal unless the city were to determine that another standard or use would be appropriate given mitigating circumstances that are offset by the plans submitted by the developer. One of the purposes of the PUD district is to give the City Council the needed flexibility in addressing development and redevelopment problems. • 5 -13 -04 Page 1 Regulations governing uses and structures may be modified by conditions ultimately imposed by the City Council on the development plans. The PUD process involves a rezoning of land and, therefore, is subject to meeting the City's Rezoning Evaluation Policy and Review Guidelines that are contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. Also, proposals must be consistent with Section 35 -355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, which addresses Planned Unit Developments. Attached for the Commission's review are copies of Section 35 -208 and 35 -355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance for review. As mentioned previously, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the overall PUD for Brookdale Center. That resolution contained the various findings and considerations necessary for approving the PUD. For the most part, these findings and considerations were made given the applicant's proposed use and this amendment is to acknowledge the building details and location through the PUD Amendment process. Approval of this Planned Unit Development should acknowledge compatibility with the Policy and Review Guidelines of the previously mentioned Section 35 -208 and also the provisions of Section 35 -355 of the Zoning Ordinance. Attached is a copy of the Brookdale PUD site plan. We believe that the proposed amendment submitted by Frauenshuh Companies is in keeping with the findings and considerations associated with the previous approval. The proposed amendment, we believe, will be consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses in the area. The development plan amendment being submitted also will bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed development or be offset by factors related to the plan. It also appears that the use of the property in the context of the overall development will be a good long range use of the land and can be considered to be in the best interest of the community. The plan, as will be shown in the site and • building plan proposal, utilizes the property consistent with the Planned Unit Development approval granted under Resolution No. 99 -37. That approval allowed a 5 ft. rather than 15 ft. green strip at certain locations around the Brookdale Shopping Center site where an appropriate 3 to 3 % ft. high decorative masonry wall was to be installed to offset negative effects. The Commission may recall that this standard has been allowed in other areas of the City. With this development they propose to take advantage of this grant and provide a 3 ft. high decorative fence where the green strip setback will be 5 ft. STTF. AND BTM,DTNCT PLAN PROPOgAT The proposed amendment calls for a 4,195 sq. ft., 104 seat Dairy Queen Grill and Chill restaurant in the area authorized for an approximate 10,000 sq. ft. retail/restaurant building. It should be noted that there are plans for future expansion of this building to accommodate a future retail user. That plan will also be subject to the Planned Unit Development Amendment process prior to issuing building permits for such an expansion and its construction. ACCFSWPARKTNCT Access to the Dairy Queen site will be via the Brookdale Shopping Center perimeter road. No direct access to or from County Road 10 is proposed, nor would it be recommended. The access from the perimeter road will be shifted to the east, somewhat closer to the entrance to Brookdale but directly across from designated entrances to the south. Cross access to the west is anticipated and provided for in the site plan. 5 -13 -04 • Page 2 • The Commission may recall that the Planned Unit Development approval for Brookdale in 1999 allowed a 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leaseable area for Brookdale rather than the 5.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area required for retail developments. Findings were made that this was an appropriate parking requirement for the regional mall. The plan approval also acknowledged a proof of parking for the Brookdale Shopping Center of 5,700 parking spaces on the site. This would accommodate the expansions and out buildings proposed as part of the Brookdale redevelopment. Based on the approval granted in 1999, 5,133 parking spaces were required for Brookdale. The number of parking spaces being eliminated due to the Dairy Queen Grill and Chill proposal is 67. The number of parking stalls being replaced is 38. the 4,195 sq. ft. based on the allowed 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leaseable area would require 19 parking spaces for this addition. As indicated, 38 parking spaces are to be provided, therefore, there is no conflict with the parking requirements authorized for Brookdale. The building itself will be located to the center of the site and parking and drive lanes will surround it. To the north side of the building is a drive up window with a 12 ft. 4 in. drive lane leading to it. Curb and gutter will be provided on both sides of this drive lane and because this is the area where the green strip will be reduced to 5 ft., a 3 ft. high masonry decorative fence will be provided. Parallel parking spaces will be provided on the south side of the site adjacent to the concrete delineator separating the site from the perimeter road. Customers can also take advantage of overflow parking areas in the mall parking lot further to the south. CTR ADTNGfDR ATNAGF./i TTTT .TTTF,S • The applicant has provided grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans which are being reviewed by the City Engineer who will be providing written comments relative to this proposal. The site is required to be bounded by B -612 curb and gutter where new curbing is to be provided. It is recommended that the curbing and delineation be carried around the site where the future building addition is proposed. Utilities such as sewer and water are available and will be tied into existing services within the Brookdale site. Drainage and storm sewer will also tie into the existing Brookdale system. LANDSCAPING The applicant has submitted a landscape plan for providing landscaping around their particular site. A landscape plan consistent with the point system was approved for the overall Brookdale site at the time the Planned Unit Development was approved in 1999. The applicant plans to replace any trees that may have to be removed due to construction. They propose a patio area to the east end of the building, which would include some outside convenience seating for customers. This area will be provided with evergreens such as Blueberry Delight Juniper, Sky Rocket Upright Juniper, and Brandon Arborvitae. Perennials such as Moon Beam Coreopsis, Pink Day Lilly, Grow Low Fragrant Sumac, and Butterfly Blue Pincushion Flower are also proposed. Shrubs include Techny Globe Arborvitae. Replacement trees would include Spruce and Ash. The landscape plans indicates existing landscaping and planters located on the Brookdale property adjacent to County Road 10. 5 -13 -04 Page 3 BT Tfi.T)TNCT The applicant has submitted building elevations showing the Dairy Queen Grill and Chill • building. The primary exterior finish is EIFS accented by simulated stone in various locations surrounding the building. Fabric awnings or canopies are shown over the windows on each of the elevations with stone accent below the windows. The wall where a future addition might be attached will be finished consistent with the finish around the remainder of the building to give it a uniform appearance. The only signs that are allowed for this site are wall signs consistent with the sign ordinance. This would allow up to 10 percent of the wall area to be in signs. To be considered a type of wall sign, the signs must be affixed to the walls and not project about the roof line. T ,TC"THTTNGilTR ASH The applicants have submitted a lighting plan showing lighting fixtures. Our concern is that light be directed down on the site and not create glare off site. It appears the fixtures proposed will meet this standard of the ordinance. The trash container will be located east of the building and will be of a material to match the exterior of the building. The gates will be of a solid opaque type gate with a solid opaque EIFS material to match the existing building. PR OC'F.T)T TR F. As pointed out previously, this proposal is an amendment to the Planned Unit Development approval granted for the Brookdale Regional Center. As a Planned Unit Development, the proposal is required to follow the procedures required for the original Planned Unit Development. This requires a public hearing, which has been scheduled. Notices of the • Planning Commission's consideration have been sent and a notice has also been published in the Brooklyn Center Sun/Post. All in all, we believe the plan is in order and consistent with the original Brookdale development approval and, therefore, we would recommend approval of the amendment. Approval of this application should acknowledge the findings, considerations and conditions that are comparable to those made in the previous City Council Resolution. A draft Planning Commission Resolution is offered for the Commission's consideration. This resolution outlines the Commission's consideration of the matter and also recommended considerations and conditions for approval. 5 -13 -04 • Page 4 C" or BROOKLYN • MEMORANDUM CENTER DATE: May 7, 2004 TO: Ron Warren, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Todd Blomstrom, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: DQ Grill & Chill Preliminary Site Plan Review Planning Commission Applications 2004 -007 The Public Works Department reviewed the following preliminary documents submitted for review under Planning Commission Applications 2004 -007 for the DQ Grill & Chill site located at Brookdale Mall. • Sheet CO, Topographic Survey dated April 15, 2004 • Sheet C1, Demolition Plan dated April 15, 2004 • Sheet C2, Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan dated April 15, 2004 • Sheet C3, Utility Plan dated April 15, 2004 i Sheet C4, Details dated April 15, 2004 • Sheet C5, Details dated April 15, 2004 • Sheet C6, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan dated April 15, 2004 The preliminary site plans appear to be in order and approval is recommended subject to at least the following conditions: Water Supply and Sanitary Sewer Service Brookdale Mall has two water service connections to the City's water distribution system. One of the two connections, a 12 -inch diameter water main, is currently located through the proposed building location. The applicant is proposing the relocate this water main in order to allow site development. The proposed building would then obtain water service by connection to the newly relocated water main. Sanitary sewer service to the proposed building would be provided by a connection to the internal private sanitary sewer system within the Brookdale Mall site. This private collection system connects to the City's sanitary sewer system that extends south from Northway Drive to the west of the mall buildings. 1. Prior to shut -down of the water main through the site, the applicant shall provide the City with survey ties to water valves north of the mall building that must be closed to allow relocation of the 12 -inch water main. 2. Applicant shall install a new water main control valve and valve vault within the right -of- GADepts \Public Works \En gin eering\Development & Planning\DQ Brookdale\Prellm Site Plan Review.doc way of County Road 10, at the applicant's expense. Valve and valve vault structure shall • be new and comply with city specifications. 3. Water main relocation shall meet city specifications for municipal water main construction. All water main relocation work shall be coordinated with the City's Supervisor of Public Utilities. 4. The proposed water main alignment along the north side of the proposed building should be shifted north to maintain a minimum of 8 -feet separation between the pipe and exterior face of the building. 5. Applicant's engineer shall confirm that the existing sprinkler vault is structurally sound and capable of supporting passenger vehicle loads. The existing irrigation/sprinkler system shall be restored to operable condition upon completion of the proposed improvements. 6. The proposed site plan shall be subject to the approval of the City Fire Chief, including hydrant spacing requirements and any other requirements of the Fire Department. Fire hydrants shall be Waterous Pacer WB 67 -250 in compliance with the City's standard plate 1001. 7. The existing private sanitary sewer manhole within the construction limits must be in a sound and water -tight condition upon completion of site improvements. Connections shall be core - drilled and sealed. Storm Drainage Storm water runoff from the site is conveyed south through private storm sewer to the trunk storm sewer crossing under TH 100. This trunk storm sewer discharges into the storm water management ponds located within Centerbrook Golf Course. 1. The proposed site improvements would result in an increase in impervious surface of approximately 0. 12 acres. Applicant must address NPDES post construction best management practices for this net increase in impervious surface. One option would be to convert a portion of the unused pavement area along the south side of the drive - through lane to a landscape / turf area until the future building site to the east is developed. 2. Manhole No. 2 located at the site entrance drive shall be fitted with an inlet grate type casting. 3. Erosion control measures shall be installed prior to starting site grading operations. Applicant shall install and maintain storm sewer inlet protection measures until site parking lot paving is complete. 4. An NPDES construction site erosion control permit must be obtained from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency if the disturbed area for the project exceeds one acre. G:\Depts\Public WorksEngineering0evelopment & Planning\DQ Brookdale\Prelim Site Plan Review.doc - i • Traffic and Street Connections The site will be accessed from the private internal drive lanes within Brookdale Mall property. The proposed site layout generally provides for adequate traffic circulation. 1. Plans shall be amended to address existing cross walk pavement markings leading to the proposed median along the south site boundary. The addition of a concrete sidewalk panel over the rock mulch median at the existing cross walk location is preferred. The above comments are provided based on the information provided by the applicant at the time of this review. Subsequent approval of the final plans may require additional modifications or dedications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, gas and electric service, final grading, and geometric design of streets as established by the city engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of final plans. • • G: \Depts\Public Works \Engineering\Development & Planning\DQ Brookdale\Prelim Site Plan Review.doc I Islas v so ,- • . • • OVERL DISTRICT Fa • s .�� �•' ! III 11111111111�1� �� UNAi i'!i Wig im ! �� 1!1 e ra ..ate �t ■� r. 1 1� ■ �7 = . • on= 0 Bid 1t� ....1 � 1111111111 ®� �+� -.,.__ �i� ■■ �. � 3�,-� Cif S - .x•1:.1 � t - - I MUM n N.f. �� _ z, ��� - P a r M s AS rer #'� t e tae s x . i �s m� n � � � r "�,. � sS�a �i�a� �f.j' �F�� "� .. �� �i �fi 1�1� � �• � Y r ri can VIA , It �r e M � 4 � � er ¢ 4 � .,: ,. �� �� � i c. � � /'� .3 , may . .. t•� �, ., �r `�`. • Member Kay Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 99 -37 RESOLUTION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMNIISSION APPLICATION NO. 99001 SUBMITTED BY TALISMAN BROOKDALE, LLC. WI1EREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 99001 submitted by Talisman Brookdale, LLC proposes a rezoning from C -2 (Commerce) to PUD /C -2 of the Brookdale Regional Shopping Center which is bounded on the north by County Road 10, on the east and south by T. H. 100 and on the west by Xerxes Avenue North; and WHEREAS, this - proposal comprehends the rezoning of the above mentioned property and site and building plan approval for the expansion, redevelopment and rejuvenation of the Brookdale Regional Shopping Center to include the following; 1. The reconfiguration of the west end of the mall including an 89,650 sq. ft. second floor to include a 20 screen, 4,252 seat theater; 2. An approximate 13,200 sq. ft. addition to the north entrance to the mall for • two restaurant sites; 3. An approximate 13,000 sq. ft. addition for general retail use and revised mall entry way along the southerly side of the complex adjacent to Dayton's; 4. A 4,650 sq, ft. freestanding Applebee's restaurant building along Xerxes Avenue North, northerly of the 56th Avenue entrance to the Brookdale Center; 5. Conceptual approval, subject to further Planning Commission and City Council review and approval, of four additional freestanding restaurant and /or retail buildings to be located around the perimeter of the shopping center; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on February 25, 1999, when a staff report and public testimony regarding the rezoning and site and building plan were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Application No. 99001 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 99 -02 on February 25, 1999; and RESOLUTION NO. 99 -37 • WHEREAS, the City Council considered Application No. 99001 at its March 8, 1999 meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the rezoning and site and building plan request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating rezonings contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the Planned Unit Development ordinance contained in Section 35 -355, the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Planning Commission's recommendation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to approve Application No. 99001 submitted by Talisman Brookdale, LLC in light of the following considerations: 1. The rezoning and Planned Unit Development proposal are compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance and will allow for the redevelopment and rejuvenation of the Brookdale Regional Mall which is a unique development within the City of Brooklyn Center and whose viability is considered to be • vital to the stabilization of other commercial properties within the community. 2. The rezoning and Planned Unit Development proposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. 3. The utilization of the property as proposed under the rezoning and Planned Unit Development proposal will conform with city ordinance standards for the most part with the exception of the following allowed variations from the zoning ordinance which are considered reasonable standards to apply to this proposal: • Allow 5 ft. rather than 15 ft. greeenstrips at certain locations where an appropriate 3 to 3 lh ft. high decorative masonry wall shall be installed to offset negative effects (this standard has been allowed in other areas within the city). i RESOLUTION NO. 99 -37 • Allow a 35 ft., or non -major thoroughfare setback for certain out building locations based on variances that have been allowed for other commercial buildings along major thoroughfares and seem appropriate in this location as well. • Allow a 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable area rather than the 5.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area required based on the shared parking analysis provided and on Urban Land Institute Methodology indicating a maximum of 5,133 parking spaces as being needed for the Brookdale Mall given the mix of uses and square footages proposed in order to meet the maximum weekday and weekend hourly demand, which is also in keeping with at least two major regional malls in the area. • Allow the 60 ft. wide parking dimension standard for 90 degree parking rather than the 63 ft. required separation based on the fact that Brookdale has previously been allowed to have the 60 ft. parking standard and it appears that it would work in this situation. • Allow two freestanding signs up to 320 sq. ft. in area along T. H. 100 based on the uniqueness of the size, diversity of uses and significance of Brookdale Mall. • Allow an increase from 15 percent to 20 percent of the allowable restaurant use without requiring additional parking at Brookdale based on the uniqueness of Brookdale, the mix of uses and dynamics of multiple stops per person at the Center. 4: The rezoning and Planned Unit Development proposal are considered compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. 5. The rezoning and Planned Unit Development appear to be a good utilization of the property under consideration and the redevelopment and rejuvenation of Brookdale Regional Mall are an important long range use for the existing property and are considered to be an asset to the community. RESOLUTION NO. 99 -37 6. In light of the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating rezonings contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and that the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that approval of Application No. 99001 be subject to the following conditions and considerations: r 1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Grading,' drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits to assure completion of all approved site improvements. 4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or on- ground mechanical equipment,shall be appropriately screened from view. 5. The buildings and building additions are to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 6. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all new landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 7. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery, which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances with the exception of allowing two freestanding signs up to 320 sq. ft. in area along T. H. 100. 8. Plan approval acknowledges a proof of parking for the Brookdale Shopping Center based on providing 5,700 parking spaces on site. • RESOLUTION NO. 99 -37 The applicants are allowed to retain the existing parking configuration except where required modifications are to be made based on building expansions or additions. New parking lot construction or reconfiguration shall require concrete parking delineators as approved by the City Engineer. 9. The applicant shall submit as built surveys of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. 10. The property owner shall enter in an easement agreement for maintenance and inspection of utility and storm drainage systems as approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 11. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center's standard specifications and details. 12. Approval of the application is subject to the review and approval of the • Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission with respect to storm drainage systems. Effective compensating storage shall be approved prior to the construction and filling for the proposed building No. 5 on the site plan. 13. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior ` to the issuance of building permits. Said agreement shall acknowledge the various modifications to city ordinances and the rationale for allowing such deviations by the City Council and the conditions of approval to assure compliance with the approved development plans. 14. Plan approval is granted for the Applebee's Restaurant building as presented (Building No. 2 on the site plan). 15. Conceptual approval only is granted for three other out buildings shown on the site plan as Building No. 3, Building No. 4 and Building No. 5. Planning Commission review and City Council approval in the form of a Planned Unit Development amendment shall be obtained prior to the issuance of building permits for these buildings. • RESOLUTION NO. 99 -37 • 16. 'The costs for traffic signals at the 55th Avenue and 56th Avenue intersections with Xerxes Avenue shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 17. The plans shall be modified to show: a. A 3 ft. to 3 'h ft. high decorative masonry wall in locations other than along T. H. 100 where greenstrips are less than 15 ft. b. The elimination of the access from the perimeter road to the parking lot east of Building No. 3. C. The location of the Shingle Creek Regional Corridor Trail through the Brookdale parking lot. d. The removal of Building No. 1 which is not part of the conceptual approval granted at this time. 18. Applicant shall enter into a development agreement, in a form approved by • the City Manager and the City Attorney, that assures that adequate provision will be made to accommodate public mass transit circulating through the parking lot of the center and to allow for passengers to be dropped off and picked up at the center. The applicant shall not be required to provide space or accommodations for mass transit vehicles parking, stacking, or laying over; for parking of privately owned vehicles of mass transit patrons; or for the transfer of passengers between mass transit vehicles. March 8,, 1999 Date May ATTEST: �6,M City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Fri Nelson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Myrna Kragness; Kay Lasman, Fri Nelson, and Robert Peppe; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • - - _-- --- --._ -- -- -- - -- - - - --. - _._-- - --- ----- -- - - -- Al LIIIII L I+IAI ALLIAA LI wJaDMO AM sUMMAW PiI KTAL PAN= KrAK tAYG/mll iL#X MY or WACK A cow N.T.S. P.U.O. APPROVAL COMMONS ,w...,w u....w.. ui.�a� w` TENNIf OPOSn IfALVLE AREA ��'� wry ^' .....r......._....r t.ElUi ..REO mY0 � ` � ♦ 4 � � �` .w.......�..w..r. 4 - -- i i III'rr11111111 .��, -� i�r is �,, ® w '�.'�`...�`...... me�� .•' IFEr. ^ .rl• rr1 r+.J�.••... ... .r. r `t w e.•r..•� �.r..r.•s.wN.N....1.. • � Y en qua - - - _ _- - _- ". _. _w... i ff44I11fIff4fH41HNHU a - - �ununwuTnuuun 111 ' �nw i�IIIIII1lilllll�� �O� dlreeRw `. _ fir. iiTT1TiTIliiii77lRIIiiiidt _ — yti , � N44fHIHHINWHHNfHfN� — A � -� � ,•. _ � fHIHNf4 .-• �� .• �r l - 1111''II11 , II'w11 .,,,. ��.� � lu�������}���..I� W1 ,r• . r n..�i.. f�iTl fiimimit }f� }f� }f{{{�flfA �+...� - _ e It I II frliTmliiiifl�} {}IIII}f - r� uuauuY IL 1 � 1I''IIIt1�II''IIII1111IIIIIIIIIIII II _ _ _ _ ...1..1..... i. �� V�Tii'TliTlilrr'RII7T11TTT7 -1 = - - - >.,� , UY1d A11[ run all - =100• City of Brooklyn Center Section 35 -208 REZONING EVALUATION POLICY AND REVIEW GUIDELINES. • 1. Purpose The City Council finds that effective maintenance of the comprehensive planning and land use classifications is enhanced through uniform and equitable evaluation of periodic proposed changes to this Zoning Ordinance; and for this purpose, by the adoption of Resolution No. 77 -167, the City Council has established a rezoning evaluation policy and review guidelines. 2. Policy It is the policy of the City that: A) Zoning classifications must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and, B) Rezoning proposals will not constitute "spot zoning ", defined as a zoning decision, which discriminates in favor of a particular landowner and does not relate to the Comprehensive Plan or to accepted planning principles. 3. Procedure Each rezoning proposal will be considered on its merits, measured against the above policy and against these guidelines, which may be weighed collectively or individually as deemed by the City. 4. Guidelines A. Is there a clear and public need or benefit? • B. Is the proposed zoning consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use classifications? C. Can all permitted uses in the proposed zoning district be contemplated for development of the subject property? D. Have there been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area since the subject property was zoned? E. In the case of City - initiated rezoning proposals, is there a broad public purpose evident? F. Will the subject property bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed zoning districts? G. Is the subject property generally unsuited for uses permitted'in the present zoning district, with respect to size, configuration, topography or location? H. Will the rezoning result in the expansion of a zoning district, warranted by: 1) Comprehensive planning; 2) The lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district; or, 3) The best interests of the community? I. Does the proposal demonstrate merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of an • individual parcel? Section 35 -208 Revised 3 -01 c. Accessory uses incidental to the foregoing principal uses when located on the same property with the use to which it is accessory but not including any business or industrial uses. Such accessory uses to include but not be restricted to the following: 1. Off -street parking. 2. Public recreational buildings and parks, playgrounds and athletic fields. 3. Signs as permitted in the Brooklyn Center Sign Ordinance. Section 35 -355. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. Subdivision 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) district is to promote flexibility in land development and redevelopment, preserve aesthetically significant and environmentally sensitive site features, conserve energy and ensure a high quality of design. Subdivision 2. Classification of PUD Districts; Permitted Uses; Applicable Regulations. a. Upon rezoning for a PUD, the district shall be designated by the letters "PUD" followed by • the alphanumeric designation of the underlying zoning district which may be either the prior zoning classification or a new classification. In cases of mixed use PUDs, the City Council shall, whenever reasonably practicable, specify underlying zoning classifications. for the various parts of the PUD. When it is not reasonably practicable to so specify underlying zoning classifications, the Council may rezone the district, or any part thereof, to "PUD- MIXED." . b. Regulations governing uses and structures in PUDs shall be the same as those governing the underlying zoning district subject to the following: 1. Regulations may be modified expressly by conditions imposed by the Council at the time of rezoning to PUD. 2. Regulations are modified by implication only to the extent necessary to comply with the development plan of the PUD. 3. In the case of districts rezoned to PUD- MIXED, the Council shall specify regulations applicable to uses and structures in various parts of the district. 35 -45 i c. For purposes of determining applicable regulations for uses or structures on land adjacent • �::..., to or in the vicinity of the PUD district which depend on the zoning of the PUD district, the underlying zoning classification of PUD districts shall be deemed to be the zoning classification of the district. In the case of a district zoned PUD - MIXED, the underlying zoning classification shall be deemed to be the classification which allows as a permitted use any use which is permitted in the PUD district and which results in the most restrictive regulation of adjacent or nearby properties. Subdivision 3. Development Standards. a. A PUD shall have a minimum area of one acre, excluding land included within the floodway or flood fringe overlay districts and excluding existing rights -of -way, unless the City finds that at least one of the following conditions exists: 1. There are unusual physical features of the property or of the surrounding neighborhood such that development as a PUD will conserve a physical or terrain feature of importance to the neighborhood or community; 2. The property is directly adjacent to or across a public ri ght -of -way from property which previously was developed as a PUD and the new PUD will be perceived as and function as an extension of that previously approved development; or • 3. The property is located in a transitional area between different land uses and the development will be used as a buffer between the uses. b. Within a PUD, overall density for residential developments shall be consistent with Section 35-400 of this ordinance. Individual buildings or lots within a PUD may exceed these standards, provided that density for the entire PUD does not exceed the permitted standards. c. Setbacks, buffers and greenstrips within a PUD shall be consistent with Section 35400 to 35-414 and Section 35 -700 of this ordinance unless the developer can demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that a lesser standard should be permitted with the addition of a screening treatment or other mitigative measures. d. Parking provided for uses within a PUD shall be consistent with the parking requirements contained in Section 35 -704 of this ordinance unless the developer can demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that a lesser standard should be permitted on the grounds of the complementarity of peak parking demands by the uses within the PUD. The City may require execution of a restrictive covenant limiting future use of the property to those uses which will continue this parking complementarity, or which are otherwise approved by the City. 35-46 - Subdivision 4. General Standards. y a. The City may allow more than one principal building to be constructed on each platted lot within a PUD. b. A PUD which involves only one land use or a single housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the purposes and objectives of this section. c. A PUD may only contain uses consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. d. All property to be included within a PUD shall be under unified ownership or control or subject to such legal restrictions or covenants as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the approved development plan and site plan. e. The uniqueness of each PUD requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities, public facilities and the approval of land subdivision may be subject to modifications from the City Ordinances generally governing them. The City Council may, therefore, approve streets, utilities, public facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with usual specifications or ordinance requirements where it is found that such are not required in the interests of the residents or of the City. Subdivision 5. Application and Review. a. Implementation of a PUD shall be controlled by the development plan. The development plan may be approved or disapproved by the City Council after evaluation by the Planning Commission. Submission of the development plan shall be made to the Director of Planning and Inspection on such forms and accompanied by such information and documentation as the City may deem necessary or convenient, but shall include at a minimum the following: 1. Street and utility locations and sizes; 2. A drainage plan, including location and size of pipes and water storage areas; 3. A grading plan; 4. A landscape plan; 5. A lighting plan; 6. A plan for timing and phasing of the development; 7. Covenants or other restrictions proposed for the regulation of the development; �~ 35-47 J 8. A site plan showing the location of all structures and parking areas; • 9. Building renderings or elevation drawings of all sides of all buildings to be constructed in at least the first phase of development; and 10. Proposed underlying zoning classification or classifications. Such information may be in a preliminary form, but shall be sufficiently complete and accurate to allow an evaluation of the development by the City. b. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the development plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be published 'in the official newspaper and actual notice shall be mailed to the applicant and adjacent property owners 'as required by Section 35 -210 of this ordinance. The Planning Commission shall review the development plan and make such recommendations as it deems appropriate regarding the plan within the time limits established by Section 35 -210 of this ordinance. c. Following receipt of the recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City Council shall hold such hearing as it deems appropriate regarding the matter. The City Council shall act upon the development plan within the time limits established by Section 35 -210 of this ordinance. Approval of the development plan shall constitute rezoning of the property to PUD and conceptual approval of the elements of the plan. In addition to the guidelines • provided in Section 35 -208 of this ordinance, the City Council shall base its actions on the rezoning upon the following criteria: 1. Compatibility of the plan with the standards, purposes and intent of this section; 2. Consistency of the plan with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; 3. The impact of the plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located; and 4. The adequacy of internal site organization, uses, densities, circulation, parking facilities, public facilities, recreational areas, open spaces, and buffering and landscaping. The City Council may attach such conditions to its, approval as it may determine to be necessary to better accomplish the purposes of the PUD district. d. Prior to construction on any site zoned PUD, the developer shall seek plan approval pursuant to Section 35 -230 of this ordinance. In addition to the information specifically required by Section 35 -230, the developer shall submit such information as may be deemed necessary or convenient by the City to review the consistency of the proposed development with the approved development plan. • 35-48 The plan submitted for approval pursuant to Section 35 -230 shall be in substantial compliance with the approved development plan. Substantial compliance shall mean that buildings, parking areas and roads are in essentially the same location as previously approved; the number of dwelling units, if any, has not increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; the floor area of nonresidential areas has not been increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; no building has been increased in the number of floors; open space has not been decreased or altered from its original design or use, and lot coverage of any individual building has not been increased or decreased by more than 10 percent. e. Prior to construction on any site zoned PUD, the developer shall execute a development agreement in a form satisfactory,to the City. f. Applicants may combine development plan approval with the plan approval required by Section 35 -230 by submitting all information required for both simultaneously. g. After approval of the development plan and the plan approval required by Section 35 -230, nothing shall be constructed on the site and no building permits shall be issued except in conformity with the approved plans. h. If within 12 months following approval by the City Council of the development plan, no building permits have been obtained or, if within 12 months after the issuance of building • permits no construction has commenced on the area approved for the PUD district, the City Council may initiate rezoning of the property. i. Any major amendment to the development plan may be approved by the City Council following the same notice and hearing procedures specified in this section. An amendment shall be considered major if it involves any change greater than that permitted by subdivision 5d of this section. Changes which are determined by the City Council to be minor may be made if approved by the Planning Commission after such notice and hearing as may be deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission. 35 -49 PROJECT DIRECTORY SHEET INDEX f� a bs uL ARLN,TELTR,A wGN£s5. LOi r l iN tEEfi 11 T­ SN EET Z zz - Ul 111 1 LANOSC�fe nAN - unhurvlw, eaoowr,broNwss+>+ k p s3- e3• -s+so TAx v3- er -5+a - lMwMfNt _ E_� EL1IifnENr nAN o e J. rtLnAN sfea,oes ARCwrECrs — - AOORESS? fu1ANpALE LANs BOV.EVAap I OfDSWVN,L SYRVeY SWTf •55 D peMOLIT,LN FLAN TYSTATC/Zif. DLOLWIt1SlON 55+51 Nb, pRUNbE Atm ER05iLN CONTROL FLAN ; NTACTKPLANBfRTI Ei,ANN53o.wr:R.rb4.arlhcan L5 UTLL Rut y Z T + OETNLS s CeTMLS _ N Q- z Y ENbiMEER (CIVIL) EAD a SvTff RAN - ORe55 5.50 DROONLYII DOL�CVAaP fJ _ — ARLNITf =T RIAL fy� u 9 � � r!'hiATVi�f. N,NNEMOL�S, nN 55+39 A,,, SiT� f�AN � • I i fNOIC SO F lb5- B +s -O-�Si u� T,.,L5 ppe� on CESfEE Ei1A .u-. Er R.ORELEVAT,ONS 6 E6 EC.! ENZZmw AssouA . INC. NS exrea,LR eLevnrioNS I r✓.LL sec _ � � AooRess: Tboo rtsr SIrN srReeT z C+ � 5uirf 6s ELELTRILPI rYhrATE .if, 5T. LOwS fAR i-w 55+36 — — fNONE� � •53- 136 -1D13 a.iyuvmmR.ryvaw..« VICINITY HAP DD GRILL AND CHILL I T� TE 8 s V GORE REVIB 1 " a nov 7gIW6 wOFWA710N cm OF YN cam _.� rwu woi xoa / 1,::; roua sne aiA a rwan.Enr mna x c - '•''� NS msrRCr ro ErROKDUe cExrER I ��, weEAROnrMVn) .m SE O _ .Ra15eo S.�R, a,I.rwoE ,.R., eao x Y s tg - •. �wwux iof R�coa� � RcbuR sraas " 44 E € � ? 3 3 �; NLS PxmnoCD 0 1 d • •� w w V O m ° - TI °s BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY For FRA UENSHUH COMPANIES a I * Denotes ion pipe m ant found, GRAPHIC SCALE wee and markings and ". 15 b 60 0 Denotes 11 incm�m inch k- - p e 0. • -• cop a ibed - RIVARD R'S 19121' ° I inch 30 fL A 0—fee PK Ned found Y - . ° LAKE ROAD lC0 V NTY R 0AD AT 0. 10) - — ,���j11 '^-•°• 1:�. z' LEGEND — '6' 6' � - �" .._ + w. Qw \" �'• $ Denotes E.isting Spot El..Iion D.n.f.. Cairn 9..in , „ d r, — ♦ e � Denaf.s concrete s rra.e r, ' R A C Y' G *• ,�'� \\ -B5/ -- D.not.. 1 Fool Cantos Interwl /y Denoles 5 Foot Conlw,r W-1 f I `' ' , ' "�^• -,�!X `•,�,. -� `i'� \ A 6c / / t7 Denale, Fire H \�`_. Denote. coe va. Q YQ A Denales sonrmr serer uonnae Is— Denoles Sonilmy Sewer Y Y r a e C )' f •t'A,w, :•, • f Denotes Sign �% m %* - i � d.. ;� •'! s .. ��. !'6S' O Denoles St— S..., M-h c .! AC. •` . Denales slum sewer e uw .w' j1 Light Pd, s m o / e NOTES / A ' u F - m / this bearing s ystem is rased an the l o A C • �� p y � '/ ° REGISTERED E0 L LANG SURVEY N0. 1710. - This survey nos been prepared ri Ihwt the benefit e/ of a Title Cammilmenf. - Inc NSP a emenf shorn near the NW caner of Fract C is I' a surrey dme by CE Coulfer k Inc. dared 12- 20- 2000. � . �. S /� No information as fo a act location has been provided to u /' ��'•` { G. •\ t / �`` / - The underground ulgilies shown haw been 1,,uted from field surw crou fumolion and ewisfing drawings. The s wyu makes no guarantee thoe the undergnd Wddies shown comprise all such uNifi r es in the o ea either in I (/ ob— ed, although lthgh he does certify that they ore located a s T s dop .tdy as possible from in/ormation awilable. b - BENCHMARK_ Top NO Hydrant of the Southwest Dudronf f Xeres Arc. N. h Bass Lk Read. Q Elewlian 85811 feet - I F / \ per the City of Brooklyn Center Engineering Dept. w Lu _ \ w z DfSCRIPTlON / \ Tract C. REGISTERED LANG SURVEY NUMBER 1710, Nennepin County, Mkmesofo. Q ai And U W Put o/ 7i 1 B. REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NUMBER 1710, Hennepin County, I d Z mm... to. O Q lu And C R U Pert Minnesota ..f A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NUMBER 1619, Hennepin County, Ir } MIDWEST g l Lend e Surve B1 ous & Eng ineers, Inc. I c,b bd c my I�af ny hrecl s ar w i - nd Ih ra, p y g prepare Y me y upee I.- In" / am O „ a duly registered Lwd surrcyor anger me laws of ebe state NORTH a/ r h. 1ea ° -il .uue or Minnesota. m ,p e.ue- ulaw..1 l.na sa ° r r. k crap md,.ar.�•lo bo- en lauro s...rv.a Q Blake L. Ri—d GO Reg. N. 19121 Date 05 -25 -0I O 4 -_ -_ � -- BASS LAKE R 0AD z a .. -»•... (C 0 U N T Y R 0 A D N 0. 1 0) e �x. of e... Lm• a..e 1 42.92__ SBS•OB' /!'E 100.49" N89 08 °E .140.5.9 IS' PKb SETBACK_ /�Q/ \ i s f _ _ o r — S 6RILL CHILL : E / m - -- - - -- FUTURE • f sr.. ° o / � PARKING 1 DRIVING , \ R • i \ x PARKING ING EASMENT _ • � x p lJb O 1 L __ � k��x�..�x_w�._...�..._� a Q" ----- �-- - - - - -� � mo'�1 I:vooi 3 0 ` W Eadg s, 1 eo-a — . o- FUTURE: 15 114_5J --------- --- --------- - - - - -- ------ -:.:.� pi � .....— ------ — S89 - 256.7 T AL: o all / MALL 5 / VERFLO NY, . • j t t oB �F,to / V Q _ Z n 517E PLAN SITE RAN NOTES 517E PLAN LEGEND 51TE AREA 0 iL AI — E. I . 20' - 0 OI SU I � [AOa iD BE'xi &Y� ou S�En vFUDn'. — Siw�E � W iu1. flCroaW. cowa ru Y ODU wee, vialFr. zeE zrtc5 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES: 37169 .1. 1" Q Oecpunvt rciK [. see IvAt� e•o pa.�E "w'r NON- IMPERVIOUS AR 6 03 y.I. Q corcR.ciE c'.cElxy SeE uvR • fAi10 Ulwrt TOTAL LOT AREA OF MI OMT: 40]2 6J. V N Z © Aw[zzlaLe fu Way y,wyE. Y£ TiA1� O r•nzn cnx IIKjL RIM ROW A— PRLnR, Lwj U OR slwuLa • w.alas ry .nre 2096 GREEN 5PACE II 1 ro. _ y r p p flay io •. o yEa o f Aa E• l•l I. I Y p oewR rI fnrb iN. �e • n1� pyrnafT�w»<RERfnrlo.aeA ' o IF rof, r — _ '.` . Qifc ws T� i "F —T TI s0.A°e. 0.P %/�rKw O°O'o ee0. cF ciFrx 111' .'$r'a'wve r . 0°.8....Im, E6°9: lJ "m��"��`4°$f�eP B F °sr irRarf,�>. / f•cw.c,.0 1- t"°'°�9' 8 I`��� U F wove co°r rrw. ,'a uroR artxen WrIl , . F Sil cfmw eae« �"�'"° `�6bR . r a r.rt r arwc �o`nc :AO sr nau uo xxxs ro wc...lees wsr a O ; al �1 LOOP INDUCTION 150 n LOOP INDUCTION SECT. � MENU BD. LOCATION �1PATIO LIGHT a :� 1.7 SCALE: /B" • I'- 41.2 SCALE wo -I' -O" ' 9 ° wfiiEOr�v69. f0 06TrC0.91 1 ' 2 NtS. 0..T5. ,.. ° `T�rorE0. 4>F- - � � I u arwtt �!�' e✓.d" Is vet. Y � , os „ � 4 #—+-i .. ..,... �,dn wf1.x.•e � o e$ �.,� �-� rea,s�vai<.,��t�EP �wa"Y�`P� � � slsx 1BCE ' • � a „' . ]' w0. �ea..axa.F F� � »�Re� lA ? w o xM f•� ry Far 1 / nDIREGTIONAL 516NA6E nPREVIEW BOARD o BASE PLATE PLAN it F t {y' nFLAb POLE n6ARDEN WALL DETAIL n516N DETAIL AI.2 SCALE 3 /D "•1' -O' 1.2 5CALE B /D'•1' -O' AI � 1'10 SCALE i�W 14�v� 1w • fe LocS M•SG ' Y � �L I M�r MVFx n " • P Ir art RwR o II Qii is u.^e Ilu wr ® ''`{` vZ_e�lt�uwxrt bfa M iMS1R O R �� . � IIII u Q xn �� Iymoy^ f2 �wF5 tBxTFE•� /B0.t IBr. 1D FrG�i� veto r aR e0..Gf • ! 'I i l O n� 0.� RwrE CPNi foR � w Q , i = � CexC. Fla. i?fNl 0.w Ti t fEa�n[E msss v�e�� ry _ �• 3 a. /' WS I41WE i I � ( � GaK f,6 YE 4r9C talc r s •v. Iri�� f e°:r4 •• � .mug. 1+w yF Rr cw Rrow a w wu• w S i a} e 8 d n BASE PLATE PLAN ,2 BASE PLATE PLAN ,3 SPEAKER SECT. MENU BOARD SECTION 5 CLEARANCE SIGN VET. B TiZA5H GATE P DETAIL �a�i a a_ AI? ISF • �,. -O AI 2 (PREVIEW BOARD) B /a^ . 1' -0 AIv SCALE.. S/0 1 -0 AI HO �LALE AI? E RO SCALE � � n • F c . � � - Aa_Y 2 COLOR. o�.a B.°r«\ a•8 � C� ° & � '� _ z ,... .se......... _ R _ • T ^.' RT�rf 1 '' ..o..x. -rz ..m..e. ]S'.]S'•l'eR wwie ' ~' F- Flx. -1. _. ] w...t v.. a. � o :.�. .rz..+..•.. .......... �e 7 nro /o. rs � r s1s- F�scu]� V 'Ir f Tom r l l TI It a\ 1-TO wrcx� M -_- - - - - _ LTLJ r •n •���• II II II II II �.... ° II 11 II II 11 1 I 11 II oc— �� �_ a V II II 11 II II �o�wm e.m II II II 11 II 11 IIP II �� •' II • V .,..nvp,. 11 11 11 II II T' i' 1. 1 11 11 II II II 1 1 II II Q Q II II 1Nf it - .`e mow e. 11 II II 11 II 1 1 II II - - \\ \ n ex E1FS � 1 II If yl I`II '"." " II ILL II 11 �i 11 II rewR\ 0 uRew. �. rLL LL ---LL -- L — e cox _______i �u, LH 41 __— - - — / `...a• / -- " —_ --- _ ---- -- F1ueOw cO - _ ELEVATION PATIO FENCE n TRA5H ENCLO5URE PLAN 19 TRASH ENCLOSURE WALL SECTION v AI 2 SCrYE. SN' • 1' -O' • N 2 • �— w...... wB LAKE ROAD (C 0 U N T Y � R 0 A D N 0. 1 0) 20 10 O 20 40 k 7� be I �. N.H. 5i I O-�`[f r� r I. 1 t I I. i I y ❑ � ", s -r \ �+�,� b '�.�_r PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS ABBREVIATIONS QO"_''^e r' I ' �� I ups •'."': —r.w I \ 4 s `6 oNSTRwTr Lr¢ . _ .. _ eLDa ew q u .. R, U i y + I r' ,» ❑ e 1 0' — O I8 \� 51LTAT oN pE KCnI s — — L c ° O c °Kn%e.r W 5 IV 5AYCVT LINE w ( S •�� \ RCLA(ANSTPULTION FEE FWIMS ;; E . IR. 4 a k. h +w, y � + ENTRANCE O n« — E . R _ Y 5 \ BITMINLUS OVAL Pp q P F.�� TREE REMOVAL B H r 'C P P • .. YIATERMAIN REMOVAL I 1 WN�rw 1 B55 Y I I 1 • - r r PW pt TO 5­ Of D 11T ON, ALL ENOSION AND 5CD «ENT CONTROL nEwYE+ES ABE �• • ` I • I I J `' ��� F - m CJ! N - ❑ %yr 1 OF THE INTENDED µPELTED I NSTALLED P TO AN &NAAC N6 V TY. SILT E FENCE5 SHALL BE NSTAL C� Au• �Iri l ❑ DNBTrECONT�UR Y e t:Ea �,.ISrs THE CONTnACTDRS RE �DNSaL Tr � ASCER T HE LOCATI LVVAro AND { �� ga - _ - - - MARK ALL Sr NB Vi L O TIES . HIT _ BEFORE LONSTRIKT ON STARTS. TIE e a d,�' D^ r b T I I T r I �' I y> cu c I O a I r 6`R r 1 rNE AR 1 CT MA OR Ill 1 1 ODES BuAR.=E THAT ALL THE UT L T ES ANe E i¢ di F ' AT 6 E D 5+ 0003 — APED . ELO LOCH I Ea Si w Ui� ES L TY OwvER P e -' � r , �„ I _ _._ .AFT ' V }�I aF`:j, qa ul /1 DAMA�6E occw5 D8 TO CONSTRUCT o F Ill Al! . ,P 5 Lw.. 1 1 I _ 1 F • 5 TrENE MAT BE Mlxul-ANEOUS r To BE REP9VE0 THAT Aft HIT DEM FIED \\ r rr.e m• Dsr it - LJ f- re AFIO REVrew THE NT DOCU^f6 O OBTAIN A CCLEAR IA.­­ NDED — OP WORN. d PwaR TD ANY vISTLTZBANCE wT «In THE NEIeeFIN cwN,. RiBHr -CF-HAY. A PERMIT • \ P80PIaRTY flNd _ — — — _ _ . ?O'�� .� . — . — t _ / / SHALL TE OBTAINED PROM THE vENnT I- OFFICE. A caPr of THE I—T SNALL BE 9BMIEO TO THE CITYENBICERN6 DEPARTMEN µL eD NOTES TED . ! .1. NCTE5 ANE DENO BY ❑ ON RAN 0� E AND A aeMOVE B_ NODS FAVEMENT TO LIMITS SHOP« BT SA T LINE NATCH 1 BI M ND 5 NEMD A E.1- E9i; E u — 0 REMOVE Ea15TING CONCRETE PARNIN6 t u s 5 u DISTLNB. 1 . \ Q F—T— LENT FixTLFE IS TO REMAIN. DD Nor t u m I n/O u s O C e ; - .c \ \ ReMOVe eN15TI.n LNB»r POLE. c NIAre WHETHER LIB «r POLe IS TO Be SALVABeD. AND REMOVE EMIT,- CONCRETE CNRB AT LEANEST .PINT s R DVE Ex15TI FOOD h TER IN T5 ENTIRETY. I EAISTIN woov FL 1 rS To N OT TO . DO�TERIS I- TECT _ ExISnNB SPRINKLER.,AIAT IS NDT TD BE DIB,UtBED. I�.D AT ALL TIMES. � OO NEMOVE v✓.TER H— IN ITS eNnRETY. MANHOLE AND VALVE ARE TO BE SKVPbEO AND NELOCATED IF CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FINO5 fn15TIN5 CONDITION ACCEPTABLE. V .CAL CO V - ll TO COORDINATE AN ON -51i . FEET Il 15 IN — NT CIT THE CITY o BROOKLYN CE."' N TO MANHOLE REVIF C— CONDI TI ON OFMANHOLE AN VALVE. I PLAN PO NEW WATER Y ® REr Tn:Tt 12 -INCH CIF WATER H H, REFER TO UTILITY SHeeT C5 FOR RELDCATTON J Q DETAIL NE PROPOSED 10 -INCH DIP BYPASS 15 TO BE INSTALLED AND Fu1CTIOW NB 711 To ANY WATER LINE REMOVAL T «15 ­NCH LIP WATERMAIN SERIICES BROONDKe L AND —T BEM SERVI AT ALL T-5 FOLLOW ALL CItt OP ISROONLYN CENTER STANDARDS AND FIC TO ISOLATE TM S YN NEH TV DE AL THE CONTRACTOR IE TO COORDINATE CL VALVE ^ � DE MOLITION PLAN O REMOVE E1I5TIN6 TREE. PIKE ­5 ARE TO SE RELOCATED ON SITE. IF POSSIBLE. COORDINATE ua Q z O ­E cONTNACTON. IL F GI ®BAS VALVE 15 NOT TO BE DISTURBED. FiATER VALVE SIBN 15 TO BE SALVASED AND RELOCATED TO LOCATION OF PROF05ED HATER 0 p SAN TAR +Y SEW LASTING AND IT— ANE NOT TO BE MITNNBED. PROTECT AT ALL TIME5. p STORM DRAIN CASTING AND STRUCTURE ARE NOT TO 6E DISNRBED, PROTECT AT ALL TIMES w V uj Q 0 NOgTH Q 1 qq� cl o g 0 .... _ > - � �. ��ljt:. ri.�/�c r�� =�l i .i� III �������_!_'���_ � f �I■■►����Z "�i'� �,� F ,� •gym.. ���`�`� - "\ - .a• i e��!F��i�:i - :wr► �x' - - __ - •. _ _� '...�.�� � t���E� / �� •�• �•. ��� - s ue..._ �� _ ° ilk a - ° 0 ° o , iii �� PROP05ED PLAN SYMBOLS ABBREVIATIONS H 2 � ' me.Nr Gre /ROPERTY LIK — — -' — �py Bu11Grg — " —" CONSTRULTIGW LIMNS � - -- LD ( nB>rF B A S S " "> L A K E R 0 A D SiLT "°" EEaGE — % — "— ELEV el, o° ° "• R STLniM SGYER �T E �' iF1� •ierr ¢I•. ­ WALL (C O e U N T Y ° R 0 A D N 0. 1 0) 5 w TART 5E ER ter - a nar e w .. Bur TILT 1'BYL / C-0 a.. ■ R• p l lyl of w.,b .•m r'pe TRk:TiOR LwTS r° c•K.r�r c., = _ __ •, v.wT.aer uE.aNTmNwOLE ael �.• " o.00'OOY - ' Rig.... r 9 O6'OI Jf7 �� ,:.y. WATER SERVILE MLT .BIG! S' R:6 SETBALK °r' LOHSTILLLTIOa 11 M • OP - — — f0 0.ID - - - - - - - - —� 14TH •.j RERILER �_I vKa 5 - ew 5 exawcti__ — 'O — 11 w . WATER VALVE H r.l : ,% O ©' p — p' 2O l0 O 20 40 UTILITY NoTE5: 5GALE 1" = 20 FpF. PROPOSED Q I © _ 1 / SII A ,m I os5 FRILL t GHIL °°?` 0,� , a .°.. •.. -.wx> a> o° eu x. qp dyE it I F.F.E. 855.50 `�11 I 1 - - I p w as a .. ..�•,..a" b, >,� K. , K" »2..wK :i ti' I I Y O ° ' >a r° s+.Kr > c°w,eK,w. "..re e..c, l.x.nw av avew, .°°.rKa Nr" •v...nK.. u...,..c,a m 0.1 t i t I ;e;�r�,,. o �,° ©;' ,a.rl"„ ° „F.,a.e•,,,:,°.,� .>°..��aK.,.�.,�:: �w,TM><Kµ.G � ,I — � — — — — — — — — — — —_ _ _ — — — — — — _ _ _ — _ ❑ r.°, L� .r � a . rK. °,r F.R.,..., rwL�..�..�,. w a.�. �.a...ar,r,.m,,,°, ..� yq$ a!: ayE �; i � . I I •" \ �� v �J � � � �auea ' � .' •.w. w w a io ren w�rowiw�r.+ ew.es..,e ww°ac° i.. e Q' ✓ - '� _ _ rsorrsn' amz .. — ��' \ i — — sa"IrQ£ r. +sf ZL . — . — /��. IT m �. ..� .�\`�. \ � `�� /' � �� .,q�,...�..m• M � pp •�� L,a,.�r�.�.r,°ra..•., r°K..,.�.. .,,... ° a,•�.�.,...r,.�... » i@ a \ t u m 10 o t u m i o u s / o c e \\� e• .< p . ar E» ... a« uw.rE..,.. rel..°,. Q......, e rel...... ,..,.. > „�,.ra>..n>r.. °' �Pi { ��9 t . K / I ®* x.�,rKr,Ka.. / ya:' s[ -e.i:� .,.. uv..w.r.e. uw.l i°•r ew.eur w,” recw..c.L c°"r..c,°...�w ro m.nr w c°rsrwcr�w J UTILITY PLAN . ®� nac ".c. ,°r•nwc am n�.c.r nsv. 1 " ....c ",u N,. rwnr.,oca. r°uw..L. °�r+ J1 �j G i. o' e.°o � • e., o�. °.,r,..,w ��au,a.•o..,wo•,.... "•..I..r T_ ®. ° VVER TABLE IU Z OC Q w Pi r _ NORTH wr g N I , aR.A L A X R R O A D 4 L A Xo R O A D � �.NnR�'��nu� 1� � RIM! PRa.IECr NARRATIVE L — RED _ 5•AL I[suR rr A• Ra I U 1- H, N THE IA6 ACRE BRP I:L YN PARw d2 I11 LOCARD °ry I. 111TORTSE."OTA ul. ca.RrY T IN HC C ALL F DR s. — w 1 — OVER. a� P — CAL eu� +sµ F ' ' , .; � ! i � � � �• _ d � .... OHPANrIrv6 PAaKIN6 LOTS A9 CALL oEwiyKSWI AND C TH � A N.9v oA aY EN u T O A o SST A Pi I TL.IIrvan LDTM'°1 »�T IT.� r :w R E III- B � FETEPLBBY N6 Rl S OP AEN r tK WA IS THEry -A Y TRANEPORYE. BY A 56.33 ::, I- a5CN6TLE pL., THE WATER EVENIVALLY �wniea wLL SiEe: FFLOM LOT. S S I +AWWL HE rER -W N NxoRTE. TO AN EA s R6 nAw+oLI Af 1 -N Ea Si N6 SYORM rvA,ER SYSTEM BROO -1 CF IER�£ Ei \\ 6301 SHINGLE CkEEIt aaANWPT orUE0. A L�+.�mui0 EXI STING WATERSHED PLAN PROPOSED WATERSHED PLAN BRIwxLrn CENTER. A. SSASO - 2199 OMA6O y GS I so' GS ' •� EAx.IJI)63)56958-0A9 ]a0 0 1°I i•E9T DTHIT � i I DRAINAGE AREA DATA {� : '- xoOwrl I.T HRG 55A B5 �� EXISTING WATERSHED BASH' PROPOSED WATERSHED BASIN PHpNf5s3) D3+ -5Ha c TDiAG IW[avrouS 1piu MRVU1b EXIT (C FS) 57MM EVEN' I.. UPENNW9 IT). RERWLIY6 WT CE STORM N) C t ��' TOIU (ACRES) i TOTAL (ACRES) _ _ _ONTRACr: ATES) (ACRES) - - - (ACRE]) (ACRES) - (AG x0 1 O 1AFE AREA I I.09 OOa 09 A05 JE) 5.59 T9) _,E ARG I 0.35 01 1.59 1.91 2Y1 1l ._RRAI r.n.ERSON 11- -ANY my ®�]� O. BOA 150 I.-. AREA 1 OGtl 029 016 OI, 011 061 I.IS ORANAFE AREA 2 0.15 0.01 O,2 0.51 080 I16 35 REMOVA STREET NE RILE PINES, H5a 5510N /OlPL 109 026 ITS 319 SIT E. 911 DRAINAGE AHEAD O JI 0.0, I. 09) III L. 1)2 OFFICE PHONE. (1651,5] -NO9 ORAR MAREAI D.11 006 012 OD .11 0A nJ GftL (T6S1,92 -5605 Y A9� . rma,D6 -26w 3 i A e .. CNAINAGF ARES O.W IT 009 00, 00 019 OJS ■ 9g 8f� "![ 10la1 ITS 010 "I ]l5 "I 6.5] 9Sl a °�i t GRAD M 1 5D L5: I " L A K L'' R 0 A D .F . MO RELAT -Y IT AR-5 TW HEI HE PR�F I -.E E AND PAVEMENT FEReE,ER SEDIHENT CONTROL PRACTICES. .' iL.,..`..°'.. (C O u N r r o A D) 5 U66RAE E [C. -TION5 A- CLOSE ZE 11 -E 1/5 GHT aF rK ITT-. ITT-. - ' • - _ TO 5115- 6RAOE ELEVATIONS. TIE bRADIN6 THE SEDIMENT HuST K REMOVED Y9THIN ]+ HauRS. IF "'"�` - •�_ - ZR D N T 0 E PLAN WA5 pES16 N RE D ATH THE INTENT OIT E-TUR EZ -ENT CONTROL HAS BEEN O.-S. O AMEO 511E O THAT HOLED R F IN6 I6 M TION PROPER Mgr BE N PROPERLY. It REORE NC6L651BLE IHTORT R E %FORT OF REPAIRED AND/OR REPLACE..R N 31 LONSiROCT1ON SIR VEHICLE E.TIT LOCAt1Orv5. ALL TRACKED SERI -AF ONTO PAVED SW FACE BE REnOREOUErvnYIN' S HOAAS OP DI OVERY REWIRED BY CI cc 1 1 ___ 1 " I, . n•� r I-a ~�� \ Ii ?���} Y i 1 EMOSED SOIL AREAS- O+CE EKRY , TIM M AREA CAN REMA N OPEN WHEN NOT ­.-Y BEING 2 - FOLLOW N6 WORKED. MGRS ENT, - - •, I �� POPES STEEPER THAN BI - , DAYS SLOPES I0. TO S 1A PAYS STA61L ZED AREAS ONCE EVERY 50 PAYS. '.`', ✓ 1 1 '$ SLOPES fLATTER tXAN 10 - .1 AYS FROZEN 6R01Rm. AS SOON A5 -F OCLLR5 CAT = O 1EMPpRARY PROTECT ON PER MAIENT LOVER WST BE CA PRIOR TO RE515 M N6 CON -1-T.- EAFOSEp SO LS AREAS W OR TH LONr J9 P09 TIVE SLOPE r I '�+.1 1 RA MT CIT A: RE.CA- A COPY OF THE 6aAD pRA1nwE. �",�� .) 1 1ED DATA G •, `,' i ' , ALES WAWT�a SHfFP P AH5 TELL rvSPEL _ r CLRB A ER IT ONSAHA NTENA NCE LC- ARE TO BE -IT /'`/ I - - A CATCH BAS Iry EITHER N THE FIE Lp OFYEf NSPFLTORS vEH CLE OR • ^1 1 ' 4 OF ,HE AOOVE TE0. CONVEYAME 5YSifM WNKCYED TO ANY -TO VEHCLE_ 3 5TORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NORTH Q GS I'•5o' OO�CC NOTE5: WET 60 x. 9 ALL EAI5TI" MO PROPOSED 1- BASIN5 SHALL HAVE A CATCH BASIN 5EII -I FILTER PER 2)U. Q 3. ALL STOCKPILED SOIL 15 TO HAVE 51LTATIOry FENCE PLACE. AROIM ,HE PEReETER G6 • • 0 p{li �pl ppL33 q Vy 1� j F d q a 6r9r. W till i fill " a 3 1 g S s o s 1 � 71 9 [ n a� L _G v ,I x 4 F [ F t� k g 99 c q raii kpk ye le[ �� 4 T ttY E ,l91lI � Err. i . . . . . . . . . . . 1 L ,c ..,. ca<,ert...o rA,T ... ,. .�. Q ,. .c.wwu ., �I� ��.n all 3 LIGHT -DUTY UTY E31TUMINOU5 PAVEME PLAN VIEW OF DIAGONAL RAMP Al l HAN GAf-pfc? 5irN 4 F-05T - PLACEMENT IN CONCRETE G5 .oT Tn I--- T. A-j PLAN VIEW OF PERPENDICULAR R T. :f filth; nl CURB AND GUTTER 71A, SECTION A-A Mpa wen To,rccay.Aras .......... A A -m ctzETE SIDEWALK rON5TRUCTION (TYP) TO DOME 5ErTION [70MF 5FACINC, iu =—IZI- TI T Tre rna. z Al T. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP AI?A AC�(,E551BLE GS T TO C _ T OLrR 5LAII wcc C4 • O • coa,EB. Ever a Plant Table t - - °sue— wo..mla1 Z 1 BASS L A K E R 0 A D (C0 UNT Y R 0AD N0. 1 0) _� _ _ - - 2 92 SBS•OB' /1'E 100.49 � �• .... rK.n ALL PLANT MATERIAL 5YA7YW'1 A5 MATURE 51.E •� W ........... NI - - -- GRILL CHILL a+ n - -- ; FUTURE 00000 I s - ------------------- - - - - -- I ::::::::::::. .::; :.................. 1 NOTE: TUN 1- - EE rtET P raa Ev P Ex 4EPAE ' 1 256. - --- .... SB9'09'OB "W 22 %I / • • § O North n 51TE PLAN 1 I —J ' "RAL NNOTE5 cwaaKTaa ro sae. Au unlx Anna w raorEax nTa r� �, l rbaK I a s�rA rwir Loc��Tla+s °• culw cw�ca s;Are are c.0 nuolc ro I J Knr a K rlu cower nr« r«: L..reBT m Tlar.l a rye ­ I-r J . eOxiaKTpt 5 PfSPOWS BLE !0a as 69 NB nA Aw�KiS E ar VAMKSN oa IJn `\l O TECU15 W�� gwEa KEEPTAKE ABE 5R tt _ o a ca Kcf Ee ce aEVOesls uT v IT— —1 a � I ) j § -:? _ �r� _ � V uK iB'iT T,rt,OrG NLL w KCEPrtv nrxart AmravK BY rK Btu — IwA n �' • O A ^/ 5. «rea Ku:6MGf T— LAaBXAK ruTEa,ALS •HALL BESIx ax TK vArt of AwfvTUCE er M vA _ � .^ Kn M1Axi w.tEwK iYAawx t..e o il I—rf.VC .,«,.,a,,,EA..,.l K R� anE rtu E WT L NV E MS ro BE M aV,oED Al i —1 s to D w e aacA.ucx To ec xrvEa auA _ r n TREE INSTALLATION n SHRUB INSTALLATION n ENLARGED PATIO PLAN L I p!p, LI OEGIpUWS TFEE BALLFO ANO &.4LaPPEp LI puOJS Oa GONIFErsaIS SrvwUB LI SCALES UB . I o G a xrn z� m c � o �3 d rn 2 Z OI • 0' j0 _ r I I L I � nL : c y �z Im TTIR 1111 117nE o __ _ _gy °❑ Sh ®8 8 • 6G3O1O- &RILL d CHILL –� =a WELMAN q r (jQgQ ❑ FIUl. G1SHIHCIIAIPA�IES ®SPERIDES ^ == "O — = EQUIPMENT PLAN D m� AcexrfiarT� �., °E GNTY RD 10 4 XERXES AVE N d� „, A – "° 0, 15ROOKLYN Ce4TM, MN 4 r �I7000�Q�O 9 (� 'WWWW pp F i Q 6 6 E V -' - 1`7 51DE ELEVATION (ENTRANCE) E 1a_ A3 I SCALE: I /4' - I' -O" r 11 II � Gov4Q�Cl�fld4 <1'!u b � II 11 II II p II II 0 II 1 II - T II @.o IT— II II - U1 z ------------- ---------------------------------------- - SIDE ELEVATION (DRIVE THRU) Q A3.1 $GALE: 1/i' - I' -O' M LU EXTEPWR M"ATM NOM IT- wK a t uul. w V O:K` _ wax..00 * s .ac. �o.,ro oa T— sme:.mox cwsn�rE nlrs � O � X rt G .1. F.. tu oa+wer: wscr .,. s,w. ..voa runes G... .,we: Nwcs sreu O cll = �p�` �.�.,o1— T - LA 5�1 •:roa i _ 4 � 1 :i v,wn sc rt w 3 ij 11 ws Y x — t I I . b snot IW U+ I I exr •ao nno xu Q j {53[! II II ,o •,mow ; 's r WEST ELEVATION AS? SCALE: 1/4" - 1' -0' _ nA ��, a GrrvQQ�GI�aQQ "� T � NNNNJJJ 3�'i�l TYPICAL WALL 5ECTION SCALE: 1/2' - I' -O" FR t —_ —_ MID Je55�o ppd III • 3,S{dq SS A z s6Mh g ' -------`----------- NORTH ELEVATION Q E)Cl@tIOR BNAiION NCfC C . ) � riRn�. O ""�A �w,»«�wn�� «.s .w, �� •��� "mow �::w' �4w,.o " ate.• "> K 0"w�"Kl��.w•�.,.w :»�• Q'�,s,� A '�, �ww U ws �� ��x wn« «« .oeT�r.,s. 1w: ' 1� :Nwrs ,c..w c•e�, xc rlws» Yxro r , w...��«,o,�;« A3.2 s r - --- - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r -- ---- - - - - - - ��� C�raQQ � ��oQQ , :� p g SAM & ME FB-1 xi r21 BUILDING 516NA6E =J Fr. - �MEW100A I �I ' Z 16� Fl � q l I I n U X < Drive GRADE DIRECTIONAL DIRECTIONAL DRIVE THRU MENU SIGN 516N BOARD 51TE 516NA6E • i • I B A S S L A K E R O A D (C0 UNTY R 0AD N0. 1 0) k' 3Hiy�RE7P1rN6.J� R ,, r __ _ I fit '1.8 • ).1 1.1 'x. • ,.8 _ - ].1 • 6J • ).1 • 1.1 '83 •I.a 2 1.1 'bB �`�.� 'b.l 0 y0 O TO • 52 'S.0 3.6 )� - -��•� ••••••f_� : .1 4 0 \ N CHILL �A '>.p B.1 '1A 'as 'IZ 'a.p a .1 'u`<p\ --------- GRILL i w ____ � "-- - - - - -- A • ]A .] '1.1 • 1.8 • IA '3.1 '03 '32 - .) • ,.,,A ` `p C 1-. fi - /� r �R •]] .0 • 22 • 2 • tp '].l '3.6 ']8 2 ] J 1.5 • 08 •� „ ,p FUTURE - - \ v / � � _- 3 Z. A • 2 •] • ].5 '1. 'IA 'SA 0 • .) ' .1 2.] 1,3 • 12 '1. !m 1 m / / - - -_ - -- - -. - -- - -' ',�.6 to \ 1.5 '1. ] 2 �\ 11 '3.1 '3. - Z. '] • .0 - aB '15.3 '6.8 'pB l0A 'B.l '6.T • 1., '3A '2v '3.1 '1A • OA ' / / -- _ -___- 1 1 Y ---- \ � bl\ 2.5 '].0 '3. •]. 'x 5 ' .1 • 2.p '4.1 v i 5.0 'S.8 ')A • 7.8 'fit 'IA 1.0 '1.0 '32 '2.0 '12 'OA '28 3.3 • 12 2A • tA '1.p • 22 'S0 ']S • 3A 'I.1 '22 • 21 'a.a '1.8 '5.0 '5.5 '52 • 5.5 '5.5 '11 'I, '1.1 '3.9 '33 '2A '11 ' .5 '05 '2.1 '1.p • Z.fi • ifi '1.3 '12 •a.] - 3.5 '2A '1.0 '05 ').)I '1. • 11 ' .0 52 '].] '12 • OA fi 0.2 ` _ - -- - -_ -- _ y '3N •x� • 12 • 5.7 • 55 'l.B '2.5 ' .1 '2.p ' .B 'OA ' A 'l2 ' .B '2.9 ' .5 '' 1 ']2 'S8 '1.8 � d. 1. 7. o 1,e 1., 't.o 'o I , - A 30 2.5 • a1 'Lp '8] 5 • 12 '].x 'xA '].0 '15 r 1 r MALL PARKING QI (OVERFLOW DO PARKING) da)onFeu LnHi H5 % 5 p 5 f00)cNpES ni TE 061lOINfi LO y i F00)cntl)LE nl )HE PvCPfvly UHE. 5 d 5•• a i A j NO 130LL IbWRO LibHIWt fEFWI))EO. r5 BrFr am BEmIFfYHHrs•� C s" � 0 6 v 3 g S uexon Bars 4 � / /�FLN rusrefcs OnY FLnlE � Z � � � �esEili 5TATI5TIC-5 �xls coxc. F15. � T SET U d a .c r. rosrt a.n weci ron ­ 21'm cLTIC. Fib. :j f+4C'2:• 6ux [1 T w V PHOTOMETRIC PLAN bar uHCLE LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE '"° "" " " a' "p`f 5E O [si sc.+LF 20' -0' Y ✓. IH)�r15 r T . f 1 {- cnrioH K1LRM i rina Huq<0 21'I LONL. Fib, m r�o s. »r0o-a l0 "11YP. 0 IL C1 SITE POLE 5A5E DETAIL � ESI SGALE HO SC.ILE °s • DRAFT adoption: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -01 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2004 -007 SUBMITTED BY FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES. WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 99 -37 adopted on March 8, 1999, approved a rezoning from C -2 (Commerce) to PUD /C -2 of the Brookdale Regional Shopping Center which is bounded on the north by County Road 10, on the east and south by T. H. 100 and on the west by Xerxes Avenue North; and WHEREAS, that Planned Unit Development (PUD) proposal also included development plan approval for the expansion, redevelopment and rejuvenation of the Brookdale Regional Shopping Center including conceptual approval for additional freestanding restaurant and/or retail buildings to be located around the perimeter of the shopping center. Said development approval required additional plans to be submitted for Planning Commission and City Council review and approval in the form of a Planned Unit Development Amendment prior to obtaining building permits for these buildings; and • WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2 - pp 004 007 consisting of a PUD Amendment to allow construction of a 4,195 sq. ft. Dairy Queen Grill and Chill in the north parking lot of Brookdale Center has been submitted by Frauenshuh Companies: and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on May 13 2004, when a staff report and public testimony regarding the Planned Unit Development Amendment were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Planned Unit Development Amendment request in light of all testimony received, the Guidelines for Evaluating Rezonings contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance contained in Section 35 -355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2004 -007 submitted by Frauenshuh Companies be approved in light of the following considerations: 1. The Planned Unit Development Amendment is compatible with the standards purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance. • 1 DRAFT 2. The Planned Unit Development Amendment will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. 3. The utilization of the property as proposed under the Planned Unit Development Amendment is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform will city ordinance standards except for allowing a less than 15 ft. green strip along the County Road 10 right of way. This modification from the C -2 standards is justified on the basis of the development being an appropriate redevelopment of this area and that it is offset or mitigated by factors contained in the approved site plans and City Council Resolution No. 99 -37. 4. The Planned Unit Development Amendment is considered compatible with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. 5. The Planned Unit Development Amendment appears to be a good utilization of the property under consideration and the redevelopment and rejuvenation of the Brookdale Regional Mall are an important long range use for existing property and are considered to be an asset to the community. 6. In light of the above considerations, it is believed that the Guidelines for Evaluating i Rezonings contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and that the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2004 -007 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance or permits. 3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits to assure completion of all required site improvements. 4. B -612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 5. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or on ground mechanical equipment • shall be appropriately screened from view. 2 • DRAFT 6. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 7. Underground irrigation shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. Only wall identification signs consistent with ordinance requirements are allowed for this development. 9. An as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the release of the performance guarantee. 10. The applicant and owner shall enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of permits. Said agreement shall acknowledge the Planned Unit Development Amendment and shall be filed with the title to the property prior to the issuance of building permits for this development. The agreement shall further assure compliance with the development plans submitted with this application. Date Chair ATTEST Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • 3