HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995 12-06 CCP Truth in Taxation f
cEr��
• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
DECEMBER 6, 1995
7 p.m.
TRUTH -IN- TAXATION BUDGET HEARING
1. Call to Order — '� P�n
2. Roll Call e 0 D 4) MK � , &
3. Presentation �;� 04 fx " ,—
• 1996 Proposed Budget
• 1 Overview of Property Tax System
i
4. Public Hearing, '
• 1996 Proposed Budget
5. Motion to Continue Truth -in- Taxation Budget Hearing to December 13,
1995, at 7 p.m.
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Myrna Kragness, Council Members Barb Kalligher,
Kristen Mann, Kathleen Carmody, Debra Hilstrom,
Interim City Manager Cam Andre
FROM: Charlie Hansen, Finance Director c H
DATE: December 1, 1995
SUBJECT: Truth in Taxation Hearings
In September, the City Council set the date of December 6, 1995 for the Truth in
Taxation public hearing and the date of December 13, 1995 for the continuation
hearing, if one were to be needed. If the City Council determined that all those
desiring to give public input on the budget and tax levy had opportunity to due so
on December 6th, the Council could have cancelled the December 13 meeting.
State law requires that the public hearing be publicized by printing the date on the
individual truth in taxation statements mailed to every property owner and by an
ad placed in the City's official newspaper. The December 6th date was printed on
the tax statements. However, when the ad was faxed to the newspaper, it was lost
at the newspaper and not printed. I called the Minnesota Department of Revenue
and informed them of the situation. They advised me that the remedy for this
would be to place the ad in the newspaper for the December 13th meeting. This
has been done.
The effect of this is that the City is now obligated to hold hearings on both
December 6th and 13th, since both dates have now been advertized to the public.
•
MEMORANDUM
• TO: Mayor Myrna Kragness, Council Members Barb Kalligher,
Kristen Mann, Kathleen Carmody, Debra Hilstrom,
Interim City Manager Cam Andre
FROM: Charlie Hansen, Finance Director
DATE: December 5, 1995
SUBJECT: Options and Remaining Decisions on the 1996 Budget
Since the September 13th meeting where the City Council adopted a preliminary
1996 budget, we have received updated information on a couple of revenues. The
State of Minnesota has sent revised Homestead Credit amounts. The General Fund
HACA will be $718 higher than reported in the Proposed Budget. Special
Assessment Bonds of 1995 were sold on October 10, 1995. I had included an
estimate of the required property tax levy in the Proposed Budget. The actual
property tax levy will be less than my estimate and the difference can be shifted
to the General Fund. If the City Council chooses to make this change, $9,711
• more will be available to the General Fund. The HACA and property tax changes
together could make $10,429 more available to the General Fund.
The City Council has a couple of undecided issues remaining from the September
13th meeting. The City Council cut $3,900 from the Streets Department with the
item to be cut needing to be identified. A memo from Public Services Director
Diane Spector is attached recommending a way to make this cut.
The appropriations of $50,636 for Project PEACE and $30,900 for I.NN.I.T.E.
were moved from the Police Department to the Social Services Department,
increasing Social Services to $128,547. This amount was then cut by $50,000
with the programs being cut to be decided later.
A request for $5,000 from CEAP which wasn't recommended by the City Manager
has been added to the list. The amount included in the Police Department budget
for Project PEACE was incorrect. They are asking for $47,953, not $50,636.
Brooklyn Peacemaker has submitted a revised request for $10,000 instead of the
original $15,000 request. The total now requested is $125,864. The amount
included in the City Council's preliminary budget is $78,547, $47,317 must be
cut.
Project PEACE is a joint powers agreement and notice of withdrawal must be
given by August 1st. The City is committed to funding them for $47,953 in 1996.
• The 5 Cities Senior Transportation Project is a joint powers agreement and the
City is committed to funding them through April 30, 1996 in the amount of
$3,866. This leaves $26,728 available to fund the remaining programs the City
Council selects. The following is a summary of the programs.
SOCIAL SERVICE GROUP REQUEST COMMITMENT
Project Peace $47,953 $47,953
NW Henn Human Services $15,413 None
CEAP $5,000 None
INVITE $30,900 None
N Hennepin Mediation $5,000 None
5 Cities Transportation $11,598 $3,866
Brooklyn Peacemaker $10,000 None
Total $125,864 $51,819
Attached is a memorandum from the Human Rights & Resources Commission
ranking the social service programs.
•
Also attached are materials City Assessor Stephen Baker will review at the truth
in taxation hearing.
•
Public Services Department
MEMORANDUM
Govt
Buildings
tri TO: Charlie Hansen
1
Engineering
FROM: Diane Spector;
Streets SUBJ: Reduction in Proposed 1996 Street Maintenance Budget
DATE: December 5, 1995
Parks
Public If additional reductions are necessary in the Street Maintenance division
Utilities 1996 budget, I recommend the following be considered:
1) Reduce Contractual Services in the Street Maintenance Activity,
Recreation 4384 Street and Alley Repair (Sealcoating)
2) Reduce Supplies in the Street Maintenance Activity, 4234 Street
• Maintenance Materials (Hot mix, cold mix, street oil, sand, black
Central dirt, rock, red rock, etc.)
Garage
3) Split any reduction between the two items noted above.
•
-4 1 v uj l- ) 1uuhiY1z (.enter
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Wade Lerbs, Chair Human Rights & Resources Commission
DATE: September 26, 1995
SUBJECT: Contractual Services Review - 1996 Budget
The Brooklyn Center Human Rights & Resources Commission has completed its
interview and review process for 1996 contractual services in the human service area. As
directed by we reviewed eviewed seven organizations. Attached is our ranking and
results.
One of our members chose to abstain from voting on any of the contractual services to
ensure there was no perceived conflict of interest. Another of our members did not vote
on two of the contractual se Q
services, again to ensure nsure there was no erceived conflict.
onflict.
I am forwarding our recommendations to you at this time to assist in your 1996 budget
process.
cc: Cam Andre
• HHRC
Human Rights and Resources Commission Contractual Services Review for 1996 Budget
LNW Henn INVITE N Henn 5 Cities Brooklyn
Hum. Srv. CEAP Project Mediation Transp. Peacemaker
$ Requested $ 15,413 $ 5,000 $ 30,900 $ 5,000 $ 11,598
Fund Soc.Srv. SOC.Srv. Police Soc.Srv. Soc.Srv. Soc.Srv.�
Comm. Memb
76 69 66 60 63 54
64 74 98 70 79 43
98 87 79 87 91 68
88 70 66 86 36 47
5 87 73 63 69 no vot
6 90 95 40.5 no vote
81 92 90 78 85
7 76 88 100 31 88 27 31
8 81 82 85 84 81 86
9 Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain 81
Rankin 1 y 3 4 5 6
iota! Av .,. ; : 84 5,. 7
..,,:....:.:..:.,.:::63.5
•
Page 1
PROPOSED TAX RATES
PAYABLE 1996
AS OF NOVEMBER, 1995
• OVERALL RATES
Percent
Change
I.S.D. #11 (Anoka - Hennepin) ................... 139.126 .... +2.07%
I.S.D. #279 (Osseo) ............................ 141.710 :. -2.03%
I.S.D. #281 (Robbinsdale) ....................... 139.440 ..... -1.87%
I.S.D. #286 (Brooklyn Center) .................... 133.443 .... - 12.07%
BY TAXING UNIT
City of Brooklyn Center ( &HRA) ........ ............................... 30.221
Hennepin County ........................... .........................38.099
I.S.D. #11 (Anoka - Hennepin) ........... ............................... 64.269
I.S.D. #279 (Osseo) ......................... .........................66.853
I.S.D. # 281 ( Robbinsdale) .............. ............................... 64.583
I.S.D. #286 (Brooklyn Center) ........... ............................... 58.586
(Levies are prior to new excess levy referendum)
Miscellaneous Districts
Mosquito Control District ............................ 0.261
Metro Council ...... ............................... 0.725
• Metro Transit ........................... 3.714
....... ....
Park Museum ........................... 03 3 81
Hennepin Parks ..... ............................... 1.455
Regional Rail Authority .............................. 0.001
Subtotal, Miscellaneous Districts ....................... 6.537
OTHER CITIES
1995 1996
Brooklyn Center ......... ............................... 31.091...... 30.221
Bloomington .............................. .............24.301......21.829
Brooklyn Park ............................. .............29.329......31.957
Crystal.... ............................... .............26.778......26.875
Golden Valley ........... ............................... 26.796 ...... 27.357
Hopkins ... ............................... ............27.043......28.467
Maple Grove ............................... ............25.583......24.014
Minneapolis . ............................... ............35.168......36.196*
Minnetonka ............................... .............19.665......19.302
New Hope .............. ............................... 23.245...... 23.662
Plymouth .. ............................... .............15.908......14.892
Richfield ............................................... 27.007 ...... 26.759
• Robbinsdale ........... ....... .........................21.433 ......21.657*
*Levy includes an additional market value based rate.
Note: The final 1996 tax bills will also include a new county -wide levy for waste handling
(.019% of market value).
TRUTH IN TAXATION INFORMATION
• CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
TAX IMPACT ON TYPICAL HOME
Proposed
Taxes Taxes Taxes
Portion Pay 94 Pay 95 Pay 96 95 - 96 Change
(72,300 Value) (72,400 Value) (73,200 Value) Dollars Percent
City, HRA, EDA $200.40 $226.34 $224.85 -$1.49 -0.66%
Hennepin County $271.83 $272.67 $283.46 +$10.79 +3.96%
ISD #11 Anoka- Hennepin $414.99 $447.01 $478.17 +$31.16 +6.97%
ISD #279 Osseo $484.87 $510.64 $497.39 - $13.25 -2.59%
ISD #281 Robbinsdale $467.56 $489.20 $480.50 -$8.70 -1.78%
ISD #286 Brooklyn Center $411.02 $559.55 $435.88 4123.67 - 22.10%
0
Notes: All figures based on home that is homestead and did not change in value. City portion includes Brooklyn Center
Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). The difference between the sum of these portions (City, Hennepin County,
and one school district) is the miscellaneous special taking districts.
r
•
PROPOSED 1996 CITY TAX FOR CITIES WITHIN HENNEPIN COUNTY
(ARRAYED BY PROPOSED CITY TAX ON AVERAGE HOME)
Rank
Community munit
Avg.
Mkt. Value
Pro 96 City Rate 96 G
Y Tax a
Hmstd
1 Eden Prairie $142,844 23.716% $2,137 $506.78
2 1 Edina $172,092 16.307% $2,722 $443.85
3 Golden Valley $116,250 27.357% $1,605 $439.08
4 Dayton $107,379 29.653% $1,428 $423.32
5 Minnetonka $138,403 19.302% $2,048 $395.32
6 Excelsior $116,721 23.687% $1,614 $382.41
7 Hopkins $98,088 28.467% $1,242 $353.49
8 Maple Grove $108,394 24.014% $1,448 $347.69
9 Bloomington $110,810 21.829% $1,496 $326.61
10 Minneapolis $81,041 36.196% $901 $326.06
11 Brooklyn Park $83,750 31.957% $955 $305.19
12 Plymouth $135,920 14.892% $1,998 $297.60
13 New Hope $90,159 23.662% $1,083 $256.30
14 Richfield $83,305 26.759% $946 $253.17
15 . Mound $97,498 20.387% $1,230 $250.75
16 St. Louis Park $92,584 20.026% $1,132 $226.63
17 Crystal $77,236 26.875% $825 $221.64
18 b
........................ ...............................
19 Champlin $94,036 18.134% $1,161 $210.48
20 Robbinsdale * $75,880 21.657% $798 $172.74
• * The Robbinsdale levy also includes an additional market value based levy not included in this information.
PRESSURVXLS
PROPOSED 1996 CITY TAX FOR CITIES WITHIN HENNEPIN COUNTY
(ARRAYED BY TAX RATE)
Rank Community Avg. Mkt. Value #?rop 96 City. Rats 96 Tax Cap (Hmstd) Proposed 96 CITY Tax
1 Minneapolis $81,041 36.196% $901 $326.06
2 Brooklyn Park $83,750 31.957% $955 $305.19
3 rookt}�n Winter $72366 , $'7'23 2 .
_.
4 Dayton $107,379 29.653% $1,428 $423.32
5 Hopkins $98,088 28.467% $1,242 $353.49
6 Golden Valley $116,250 27.357% $1,605 $439.08
7 Crystal $77,236 26.875% $825 $221.64
8 Richfield $83,305 26.759% $946 $253.17
9 Maple Grove $108,394 24.014% $1,448 $347.69
10 Eden Prairie $142,844 23.716% $2,137 $506.78
11 Excelsior $116,721 23.687% $1,614 $382.41
12 New Hope $90,159 23.662% $1,083 $256.30
13 1 Bloomington $110,810 21.829 % $1,496 $326.61
14 Robbinsdale * $75,880 21.657% $798 $172.74
15 Mound $97,498 20.387% $1,230 $250.75
16 St. Louis Park $92,584 20.026% $1,132 $226.63
17 I $138,403 19.302% $2,048 $395.32
18 Champlin $94,036 18.134% $1,161 $210.48
19 Edina $172,092 16.307% $2,722 $443.85
20 lPlymouth 1 $135,920 14.892% 1 $1,998 1 $297.60
• * The Robbinsdale levy also includes an additional market value based levy not included in this information.
PRESSURVALS
BUDGET HE
• ARIN G
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
1. How much of my property tax bill pays for the City Services?
Depending upon which school district you live in, between 21.3 and 22.6 cents out of
each dollar of property tax goes to the City.
2. If the City is not increasing its tax levy, why are my taxes increasing?
Various parts of Brooklyn Center are served by four different school districts. Two
districts are increasing and two districts are decreasing their taxes for 1996.
The taxable value of your home may have changed from the previous year. If you
added _
on to our house,
or its status changed from homestead to n
Y g on homestead, the
increased taxable value will result in more taxes.
The property tax burden is shifting from commercial /industrial property to homestead
residential property because real estate values for residential property has risen while
commercial /industrial property has not changed since last year.
3. What is the General Fund?
The General Fund is the entity which provides the services such as police, fire,
• streets, parks, recreation, inspections, and administration which citizens most often
think of as the City.
4. What is debt service?
This is payment of principal and interest on past borrowing for capital outlays of the
City which are repaid using the property tax. The tax levy for debt service was
$72,116 in 1995 but $139,023 is needed in 1996.
5. What are the Economic Development Authority and the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority?
These funds conduct housing and redevelopment projects funded by a combination of
state and federal grants and property taxes.
6. What is the purpose of tonight's meeting?
Tonight's meeting is to give the public an opportunity to give input to the City
Council on the budget. By state law, the City Council may not take action to adopt
the budget at a meeting at which it takes public input.
7. When will the budget be adopted?
By state law, the City Council must adopt the budget no later than December 20,
1995. The City Council has set a meeting for December 18, 1995 for the purpose of
adopting the 1996 budget.
•
8. I disagree with the final 1995 market value for 1996 taxes shown on m Proposed
Y P
Property Tax Notice. How can I get that changed?
The market values have been finalized at this point and cannot be changed by the City
of Brooklyn Center. Your avenues of appeal will be listed on the back of your 1996
Tax Statement. In order to effect a change in the market value a Tax Court Petition
will need to be filed prior to April 1, 1996. The Tax Statement will provide a
telephone number for assistance and forms needed to file that tax appeal.
9. I am on a fixed income and cannot afford the increase. What can I do?
The State of Minnesota provides a property tax refund program that has several
components. One component is targeted towards individuals on fixed or low income
and is tested and based on the relationship between the amount of your property taxes
and your income. The second component is targeted towards a rate of increase for
property owners whose taxes have increased above a particular percentage amount.
There is no income test for this tax increase refund. The qualifying levels and the
amount of refunds change each year so it is impossible today to predict whether or
not an individual would qualify for a refund. If you would like to order forms for
next year, you may contact the Department of Revenue after January 15, 1996, at
296 -4444 in order to request form M1PR. Questions on the refund program should
• be directed to the Minnesota Department of Revenue at 296 -3781.
10. Does Brooklyn Center spend too much on city services?
The State of Minnesota Commission on Reform and Efficiency developed a process
for comparing city expenditures. This commission's methodology established "Basic
Spending Levels" for all Minnesota cities and compared those levels to actual city
expenditures. Their report indicates Brooklyn Center's spending is 9% or $1,120,272
below the established "Basic Spending Levels" as established by this commission.
•
n.onlX wnu Y \.\ - ' '
oY 31r0YN1Y _ -/ ;= 1
s
Y ! w
N MY N11 �_ � /All 31113
x G Y
OOE
N 31Y M"" z Y N Y
•j
N
x 31r roI � ly
oaf 3 ' r
N 31Y LNAW
N 31Y g k ... - wlo )lm w3lr I 9Lei Y�Y• " ti Y !
�1Y/ Q X
OOzl
N 3„ MXV3f7 p Il•� ` ` _ ui
_ 1Y • 3
. p
x Ar wilt! W E �r
Oo 3 ) Y 7 N _ - -_ bytl iriiT
N 31Y om z
03, ` 4 JAY IWO10 51 1 Y G ON a w C
N ;♦Y 1ElOMYi NukOIE A " Q _
O" N 31Y E =1AYI NI ` Q ! Y A Q
w 31r 9.11"1 3 � 3
0OLI PW
3" 1 OOEI X
3 ■ _ �, G _ �yyy C.� l�
MIY OMII' yR _
OJEI � M w F
M 3tr WOOI W YO 111M wu 3A.
MIT"
" W MIT" 6 A N 3 i11 A N{ 1 ___ ffI �1�11II O
00.2 M 31 MLlll M 31 IA;YI O l'JI
r t %
M 31Y Y31v �. - ♦ O �1 � �O� M 31Y O V ii
cot
N 311 Nnlq 1 ( t v
x ;,r /1311NY I 1, ... ` C `: �t Y �_ - B
N 3nr WOIg6 1 � � �6 \ � NNN�
I ' ` f FE
M 31Y 1rN0U V •�-
0022 N INI �9
N 311:::. /` ' f i♦ 1 : N CO
311 N
oast 1 @ s E W V
M Y'NM1YA 1
OOa[ I t3tY30
U311% 31Y 3( , -
0011 r r`.
x 31Y W" �Y((1 k L� r
31, KID
N g j ti Y � y ` < �* �' 4 !� @ . y g Nl[N!2 �s�� k J L � \ • 1 `i•l
DOM x 31, L OCK Y �a3a $ 0 S B 9 s J Y N 'NI e`a b'u !,t' - ay; O
N 31r OYY31
e
N yr M3Y010 Ilk
JI( 3
AM
OOK
r
M oa3W IIr ` 1 r Y' �1`
M Y OOm NLA ♦ ONI LA3 U
Om f W
N 31Y 3JNYY/ to r Y L13 bE dII1E 3 3 s
oao.
N 31Y TtMi W! p � z � �■ ■�
N XYII p i iC \ �' I XYlf rl lY1M , 1 N N 1
0021 Y %Y) N wV.lFAX A M , d 7b
• 31Y YWI01I w N 3l= %Y/IIYN Y YW1 YC XYY YWI
1 � �
V
M 1
N 30 M YW ON
M 311 311% 4s y�, 3 K �,N2 ` _ `� �_ ! M Y y � ♦ 1 I
31Y AIL
3,V
2Yns g ^ N ! R V ` °:r
N rrl` 6 Y -_ (``__" _ __ IrO� __ `.) 3• XY xI 1
N 31Y ) VON 1 1p1pYY jC It . - Y)1 - - - - `�I w `- _• —__— ``}.
Ootp
0 3"MM0 a �0
N tn Y AIMS/ 3 y3 9 j` W S XWO V .UjO 1 1
N 31Y 111M
1 _ 1
0011 r
N 3W L1303Y
Y
OOMD d N d Yf0 g N 3 n
N 31Y LL[Of 5 s
M 31Y 00 }�
aoM *< Y 8 M 7 q
N 3tY ARM � F s -. •..
O ilAO ---
--- iQu A Cllt"3� 890OAT.2N PARK
g� A
HERE DOES �ou�
Brooklyn
Center $457
School
District
Hennepin
County $297
..:.........::...::...
•
City of
Brooklyn $236
Center
Other -
��.■�.. Metro Mosquito
Control,
Metro Council $ 51
Solid Waste
Bonds,
Metro Transit,
Hennepin Parks,
Park Museum
e $
K �
City of Brooklyn Center
ti
�D nn�rRPER 4
Monthly Annual
Public Safety $ 9.62 $115.40
3 Police, Fire, Animal Control,
Emergency Preparedness,
Planning and Inspection,
Health and Social Services
Public Works $ 3.83 $ 45.95
Snow removal, Sealcoating,
Street Sweeping, Engineering,
Street Lights and Traffic Signals,
Gov't Buildings and Grounds
• Recreation $ 3.58 $ 42.99
Parks Maintenance, Recreation
Programs, Community Center,
Swimming Pool
General Gov't $ 1.76 $ 21.12
Elections, Administration,
Assessing, Finance, Legal,
Council and Commissions, Audit
Economic Dev. $ .62 $ 7.38
Housing and Apartment Rehab,
Commercial/Industrial Dev.
Debt Retirement $ .26 $ 3.16
• Principal and Interest on Bonds
iota ;
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA
COMBINED ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET
• INCLUDING THE
GENERAL FUND - DEBT RETIREMENT FUNDS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) FUND AND
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT (HRA) FUND
1996 PROPOSED
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE AND FUND
1995 1996 1996 Percent
Budgeted Revenue Increase Increase
REVENUE BY SOURCE: Revenue Estimat - Decrease - Decrease
I. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES 6,304,719 6,303,180 -1,539 -0.02%
II. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 117,627 117,627
III. LODGING SALES TAX 395,000 480,000 85,000 21.52%
IV. BUSINESS LICENSES & PERMITS 155,600 173,850 18,250 11.73%
V. NON -BUS. LICENSES & PERMITS 140,800 175,000 34,200 24.29%
VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 3,787,747 3,827,525 39,778 1.05%
VII. GENERAL GOVT. SERVICE CHARGES 32,500 30,650 -1,850 -5.69%
VIII. PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICE CHARGES 18,100 19,980 1,880 10.39%
• IX. RECREATION FEES 843,132 835,438 -7,694 -0.91%
X. FINES AND FORFEITURES 112,000 144,000 32,000 28.57%
XI. MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 286,000 369,000 83,000 29.02%
XII. TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 100,000 100,000 0 0.00%
-------- - - - - -- -------- --- - -- ----- - - - - -- --- - - - - --
TOTAL REVENUE BY SOURCE 12,175,598 12,576,250 400,652 3.29%
1995 1996 1996 Percent
Budgeted Revenue Increase Increase
REVENUE BY FUND: Revenue Estimate - Decrease - Decrease
I. GENERAL FUND 11,457,923 11,628,994 171,071 1.49%
11. DEPT REDEMPTION FUNDS 68,510 263,210 194,700 284.19%
III. EDA SPECIAL OPERATING FUND 512,191 546,986 34,795 6.79%
IV. HRA SPECIAL OPERATING FUND 136,974 137,060 86 0.06%
-------- - - ---- -------- - - - - -- ----- - ----- --- - - - - --
• TOTAL REVENUE BY FUND 12,175,598 12,576,250 400,652 3.29%
forward \COM 3REV I ALS 12/4/95
ESTIMATED SOURCES OF FINANCING
1996 PROPOSED CITY BUDGET
MISCELLANEOUS
0 0
LICENSE &PERMITS 2.8% 3.8 /o
COURT FINES 1.1 %
LODGING TAX 3.8 °Lo
SERVICE CHARGES
7.0% PROPERTY
TAX 51.1
•
INTERGOVERNMENT
30.4%
•
12/4/95
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA
COMBINED ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET
INCLUDING THE
• GENERAL FUND - DEBT RETIREMENT FUNDS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) FUND AND
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT (HRA) FUND
1996 PROPOSED
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES
1994 1995 1996 1996 1996%
Actual Adopted Proposed Increase Increase
Expend- Approp- Approp- - Decrease - Decrease
itur riations riations From 1995 From 1995
I_ GENERAL FUND BY FUNCTION AND ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT
A. General Government 1,692,275 1,882,240 1,825,246 - 56,994 -3.03%
B. Public Safety 4,409,493 4,882,085 5,049,179 167,094 3.42%
C. Public Works 1,230,581 1,560,386 1,541,121 - 19,265 -1.23%
D. Health & Social Services 41,495 40,860 78,547 37,687 92.23%
E. Recreation 2,055,496 2,333,701 2,450,915 117,214 5.02%
F. Economic Development 199,982 187,625 228,000 40,375 21.52%
• G. Unallocated Expenses 312,736 571,026 455,986 - 115,040 - 20.15%
-------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- --- - - - - --
Total General Fund 9,942,058 11,457,923 11,628,994 171,071 1.49%
-------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - --- -- ----- - - - - -- --- - - - - --
II. DEBT SERVICE FUNDS BY FUND
A. 1994 Street Improvement Bond
Redemption Fund 300 72,116 105,458 33,342 46.23%
B. 1995 Street Improvement Bond
Redemption Fund 0 0 26,600 26,600 100.00%
- - - «-- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - --
Total Debt Redemption 300 72,116 132,058 59,942 83.12%
III. EDA & H.R.A. FUNDS
Economic Development 1,101,965 649,165 684,046 34,881 5.37%
Total E.D.A. 1,101,965 649,165 684,046 34,881 5.37%
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS
• AND EXPENDITURES 11,044,323 12,179,204 12,445,098 265,894 2.18%
forward \combezpl 1214/95
APPROPRIATION BY FUNCTION
1996 PROPOSED CITY BUDGET
SOCIAL SERVICES 0.6% EDA /HRA 7.3%
UNALLOCATED 3.6%
PUBLIC SAFETY
40.6%
PUBLIC
WORKS
12.4%
r
c
GENERAL
GOVERNMENT
14.7%
DEBT SERVICE 1.1%
RECREATION 19.7%
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA
COMBINED ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR ALL BUDGETED CITY FUNDS
INCLUDING THE
GENERAL FUND - DEBT RETIREMENT FUNDS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FUND - HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT FUN
1996 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS BY OBJECT CLASSIFICATION
1996 1996%
1995 1996 1996% Increase Increase
Adopted Proposed of - Decrease - Decrease
Object Classification Amount Amount Total From 95 From
Personal Services
Salaries & Wages 5,892,064 6,143,060 49.36% 250,996 4.26%
Pensions 806,549 837,071 6.73% 30,522 3.78%
Health Life Disab Dental Ins. 500,402 460,290 3.70% - 40,112 - 8.02%
Workers Compensation Ins. 171,606 190,546 1.53% 18,940 11.04%
Personal Services Reimbursed -541,48 -5L4,123 4.123 - 4.77% - 52.638 9.72°
Total Personal Services 6,829,136 7,036,844 56.54% 207,708 3.04%
• Supplies 526,359 538,398 4.33% 12,039 2.29%
Professional Services 593,061 524,445 4.21% -68,616 - 11.57%
Communications 208,702 210,518 1.69% 1,816 0.87%
Repair, Rental, & Maintenance 478,635 454,239 3.65% - 24,396 - 5.10%
Other Contractual Services 743,547 719,304 5.78% - 24,243 - 3.26%
Central Garage Rentals 862,283 1,151,371 9.25% 289,088 33.53%
Insurance 145,000 139,000 1.12% -6,000 - 4.14%
Utilities 455,110 465,880 3.74% 10,770 2.37%
Merchandise for Resale 45,500 51,200 0.41% 5,700 12.53%
Contingency 219.790 124,461 1.00% - 95.329 - 43.37%
Total Operating Budget 11,107,123 11,415,660 91.73% 308,537 2.78%
Capital Outlay 350,800 213,334 1.71% - 137,466 - 39.19%
Debt Redemption 72,116 132,058 1.06% 59,942 83.12%
Economic Development Authority 512,191 546,986 4.40% 34,795 6.79%
Housing & Redevelopment Auth. 136.974 31 7,060 1.10% f 0.06%
Total Appropriations 12,179,204 12,445,098 100.00% 265,894 2.18%
forwarMobjdass 12/5195
APPROPRIATIONS BY OBJECT CLASSIFICATION
1996 PROPOSED CITY BUDGET
UTILITIES 3.7%
INSURANCE 1.1% \ CONTINGENCY 1.0%
CENTRAL GARAGE 9.3% . CAPITAL OUTLAY 1.7
ZZ
OTHER CONTRACTUAL EDA & HRA 5.5
5.8%
Al
REPAIR, RENTAL 3.7%
COMMUNICATIONS 1.7%
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES 4.2%
• SUPPLIES 4.7%
DEBT SERVICE 1.1%
PERSONAL SERVICES 56.5%
•