Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995 06-19 CCP Special Work Session CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER JUNE 19 1995 6:00 p.m. Special Work Session 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Discuss Interim City Manager Position 4. Adjournment MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Myrna Kra Y Yrn ness g Councilmember Kathleen Carmody Councilmember Debra Hilstrom Councilmember Barb Kalligher Councilmember Kristen Mann ` ofieki FROM: Nancy Gohman, Assistant City Manager DATE: June 16, 1995 SUBJECT: Interviews - Interim City Manager I have received a question regarding the need for a 100 -point score sheet when you go through the process of interviewing for Interim City Manager. A 100 -point score sheet is used within our organization when hiring all employees of the City. This process is used to ensure compliance with Veteran's Preference. As you go through the interview process for Interim City Manager, you do not have to use a 100-point score sheet although you may want to use one as a tool in r 1 order to he g Y Y Pou Y with your decision. The reason ou do not have to use a 100-point score sheet is that Y P • Veteran's Preference does not apply to the to executive position within h organization PP Y t e P P which is involved in hiring and firing and other top management decisions for the overall operation of the jurisdiction. Attached is the 100 -point score sheet that is used when hiring our regular full- and part-time employees. Again, you can use this in the process as a tool to help you with the interviews, although it is not necessary. If you need any other information regarding hiring procedures, employment practices, human resources, Veteran's Preference, etc. please don't hesitate to contact me at 569 -3303. Attachment • City of Brooklyn Center s Oral Interview Rating Form Applicant: Date: Position: Each oral interview board member should rate the candidate independently. Rating should not be a "collective opinion ", but should represent the personal decision and assessment of the Rater. Six traits of a general and subjective nature are suggested as a guide in rating the candidate. These are: 1. Self- Expression (10 points maximum) 2. Self - Confidence (10 points maximum) 3. Personal Relationships (10 points maximum) 4. Ability to Learn (15 points maximum) 5. Work Attitude (15 points maximum) 6. Overall Qualifications (30 points maximum) Scope notes covering the suggested elements to consider in assessing the candidate's qualifications are given on the reverse side of this form. Degrees of rating are suggested. Definitions for these degrees . of rating are: Outstanding Exhibits highest degree of capability; expectancy for superior performance on the job. High Would be expected to be very capable; very much above average; perform with distinction. Acceptable Would be expected to have average capability; adequate, but about average performance. Doubtful Questionable as to ability to perform even at a minimally acceptable standard. Unlikely Unacceptable; definite problem area. Point values are also given on the reverse for these five degrees of rating. The rater may use intermediate point values if desired. In addition, at the end of the interview after the candidate has been dismissed, the board should assess the candidate's work experience and collectively agree as to points to be awarded as Credit for Experience. • To Rater: Circle, or write in and circle, that number representing your own personal decision. Self Expression (Fac�ty of speech, word choice, commumcatWfi TO MS Outstanding High Acceptable Doubtful Unlikely 10 9 7 4 0 Self Confidence .(BeLef in own abiLtg, self assured, confident) Outstanding High Acceptable Doubtful Unlikely 10 9 7 4 0 Personal Re att onships fAbMty to get along, tact, friendLness) Outstanding High Acceptable Doubtful Unlikely 10 9 7 4 0 Abty to learn {;Capable of understanding and Iearun the oti) g J Outstanding High Acceptable Doubtful Unlikely 15 12 8 4 0 Work Attitude (York ethic,, why this Job; ambitions,: permanency) Outstanding High Acceptable Doubtful Unlikely 15 12 8 4 0 averali Qualifications (Your ' rsona1 u r enf of candidate s overall Pe...:.....i ._ _. chances of ` success Outstanding High Acceptable Doubtful Unlikely 30 28 23 12 0 Sub Total Credit: for Experience (Tnanunous Agreement) Highly job related Job Related Minimal 10 5 3 TQTAL'SCORE Rater's Signature: y i MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Myrna Kragness FROM: Nancy Gohman, Assistant City Manager DATE: June 15, 1995 SUBJECT: John Brandel I received a call from John Brandel's office at the Humphrey Institute. Mr. Brandel's office stated that he appreciated the call from the Brooklyn Center Mayor regarding the position of interim city manager, but at this time he must decline. Mr. Brandel's office stated that his schedule is full through September of 1995 and it will not allow for any additional commitments at this time. cc: Councilmembers Sy Knapp File •