HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992 08-24 CCM Regular Session MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
AUGUST 24, 1992
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor
Todd Paulson at 7 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Todd Paulson, Councilmembers Celia Scott, Jerry Pedlar, Dave Rosene, and Philip
Cohen. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public Works Sy
Knapp, Finance Director Paul Holmlund, Director of Planning and Inspection Ron Warren,
City Attorney Dave Kennedy, City Engineer Mark Maloney, Personnel Coordinator Geralyn
Barone, and Council Secretary Nancy Berg.
OPENING CEREMONIES
A member of the audience offered the invocation.
OPEN FORUM
Kenneth Hirte, 4113 61st Avenue North, addressed the City Council stating his concern over
the cost of removing a diseased boulevard tree on his property. He told the Council his cost
will be $152 and that the cities of Brooklyn Park, Crystal, Fridley and Robbinsdale do not
charge their residents for diseased tree removal.
The City Manager explained the City shares in half the cost for removal and the policy is
in effect to benefit both the property owner and the City. He further explained this has
been the program for many years and if the Council changes the policy there would be the
problem of the expense to repay property owners who have paid their share in the past.
Councilmember Rosene asked staff if Mr. Hirte could pay his share in installments.
The Director of Public Works noted the policy is if the payment is less than $250, then
payment must be made in a one -year period. If payment is larger than $250, it can be
spread out over two years. He further explained the property owner has the choice of
paying within 60 days after the work is completed, or allow it to be put on as a special
assessment and pay it in 1993.
8/24/92 - 1 -
Councilmember Cohen asked when this assessment would be certified and put on the tax
roles if the property owner chose to delay payment.
The Director of Public Works answered if the property owner chooses not to pay this year,
the payment would not have to be made until 1994. The certification would be in the fall
of 1993 and then payment will need to be made in 1994.
Councilmember Cohen stated the property owner has asked the Council to take a look at
this policy. The issue is the tree must be removed and the question is who pays for the
removal. He suggested the Council decide if the policy is just as fair today as the day it was
put into effect.
Councilmember Rosene agreed with Councilmember Cohen that the Council should take
a look at why this was established.
Councilmember Pedlar also agreed with Councilmember Cohen but stated the Council must
take into consideration the City has had a number of diseased trees removed and many
property owners have paid their share of the removal. He stated before he could
recommend the City change its policy, he would have to do some research.
There was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar and seconded by Councilmember Cohen
directing taff to bring impact f discontinuing -
g g p t o property owner co payment to the
Council.
The Director of Public Works stated there should be two conditions:
1. The tree must come down as it is an infectious tree.
2. The payment by Mr. Hirte be put on hold and if the Council reaffirms the policy,
then Mr. Hirte would have 20 days from date of reaffirment, to make payment or
payment will go on the tax roles.
I
Councilmember Cohen explained he has paid to have diseased trees removed from his
property, but in all fairness the Council will take a look at the policy.
Councilmember Pedlar agreed with the recommendations of the Director of Public Works.
He asked that the tree be removed and the matter be brought back to the Council the last
meeting in September.
There was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar and seconded by Councilmember Cohen to
add to the original motion to put a hold on the payment process, and the City will remove
the tree in the meantime. The motion passed unanimously.
8/24/92 -2-
The City Attorney added the Council will be considering at their next Council meeting the
special levies for 1991. The Council will need to renew this diseased tree removal policy for
1992.
COUNCIL REPORTS
There were no council reports.
There was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
add the Financial Task Force Recommendation Regarding City Council Salaries to the end
of the August 24, 1992 Council Agenda. The motion passed unanimously.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Paulson inquired if any Councilmembers requested any items be removed from the
consent agenda. None were made. Later in the meeting, consensus was reached to remove
item 11h from the Consent Agenda.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
AUGUST 10, 1992 - REGULAR SESSION
There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
approve the minutes of the August 10, 1992, regular session as printed. The motion passed
unanimously.
RESOLUTIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -198
Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1992 -21
TELEVISION INSPECTION OF SANITARY SEWERS, ACCEPTING PROPOSAL, AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFORE
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia
Scott, and the motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -199
Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENT NO. 69791 WITH THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF SAID AGREEMENT, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS
THEREFORE
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia
Scott, and the motion passed unanimously.
8/24/92 -3-
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -200
Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE
REMOVAL OF DISEASED TREES (ORDER NO. DST 08/24/92)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia
Scott, and the motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -201
Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AMENDING SCHEDULES B AND I OF THE 1992 PAY PLAN
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia
Scott, and the motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -202
Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF A LAWFUL GAMBLING LICENSE
TO THE BROOKLYN CENTER LIONS CLUB TO OPERATE A PULL -TAB AT THE
LYNBROOK BOWL
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia
Scott, and the motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -203
Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE
DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER LIONS CLUB
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia
Scott, and the motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -204
Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION DECLARING HERITAGE FESTIVAL AS A CIVIC EVENT FROM
OCTOBER 19 THROUGH OCTOBER 24, 1992
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia
Scott, and the motion passed unanimously.
8/24/92 -4-
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -206
Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1992 GENERAL FUND BUDGET AND
APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT AND AUTHORIZING TRANSFER
OF FUNDS FROM DRUG FORFEITURE MONIES
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia
Scott, and the motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -207
Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE
DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE OF JAMES P. LINDSAY
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia
Scott, and the motion passed unanimously.
LICENSES
There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
approve the following list of licenses:
ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT
Axiom Marketing Brooklyn Center
Brooklyn Center Country Store 3600 - 63rd Ave. N.
GARBAGE AND REFUSE COLLECTION VEHICLE
Waste Management - Blaine 10050 Naples St. NE
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
Pfiffner Heating & Air Conditioning 6301 Welcome Ave. N.
RENTAL DWELLINGS
Initial:
Donald Steil, Dwaine Nelson
& Harriet Berg 620 - 53rd Ave. N.
Esam & Tamera El- Fakahany 1215 -1217 54th Ave. N.
Renewal:
Gary D. Anakkala 5412 - 5412 -1/2 Fremont Ave. N.
James & Kathleen Utecht 5900 Washburn Ave. N.
Ryan Lake Partners 3401 -3413 47th Ave. N.
8/24/92 -5 -
SPECIAL FOOD HANDLING ESTABLISHMENT
National ICEE 1600 Freeway Blvd.
The motion passed ananimously.
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
The City Manager introduced Planning Commission Application No. 92011 submitted by
Metropolitan State University which is a request for special use permit approval to allow an
extension campus in a 1
p C A zoning distract in the office building at 6300 Shingle Creek
Parkway. This application was considered by the Planning Commission at its August 13,
1992, meeting and approval was recommended.
The Director of Planning and Inspection explained this is a request for a determination that
a university campus i
ty p s an allowable special use in the C1A zoning district and concurrently
a request for special use permit approval to allow an extension campus of Metropolitan
State University in the office building at 6300 Shingle Creek Parkway. He reviewed for the
Council the recommendation of the Planning Commission.
Councilmember Rosene stated the Council has a lot of supporting evidence and he is ready
to go forward.
Councilmember Scott stated she has received several calls from tenants in the building who
expressed their approval of this project.
Mayor Paulson opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on Planning
Commission Application No. 92011 submitted by Metropolitan State University requesting
special use permit approval to allow an extension campus in a C1A zoning district in the
office building at 6300 Shingle Creek Parkway at 7:37 p.m.
Daniel Kirk, Associate Vice President for Metropolitan State University, expressed his
gratitude for the support and help of the City staff and asked if the Council had any
questions.
Mayor Paulson asked Mr. Kirk if the University will be ready to start classes this Fall. Mr.
Kirk stated when the University receives the permit, it will begin immediately.
Councilmember Rosene asked if the matter of adequate egress had been settled.
The City Manager stated it was determined to not be a problem. It was noted that changes
were made to classroom locations and a staircase was widened to eliminate any future
problems.
There was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar and seconded by Councilmember Cohen to
close the public hearing at 7 :40 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
8/24/92 -6-
There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
approve Planning Commission Application No. 92011 submitted by Metropolitan State
University subject to the following conditions:
1. Special use permit approval acknowledges a university campus with up to 18
classrooms, occupying up to 16,605 sq. ft. of rentable space at 6300 Shingle Creek
Parkway as contained in the applicant's plans and letter dated August 4, 1992. Any
expansion or alteration of the proposed use beyond that contained in the
aforementioned submittal shall require an amendment to this special use permit.
2. The special use permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations.
Any violation thereof may be grounds for revocation.
3. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with
respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits.
4. Students attending weekday, daytime classes shall not exceed 60 at any given time.
The motion passed unanimously.
ORDINANCES
The City Manager introduced An Ordinance Amending Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances
Relating to Real Estate Signs. He explained it was offered for a first reading on July 27,
1992, published in the City's official newspaper on August 5, 1992, and is offered for this
evening for a second reading.
Councilmember Cohen asked that this Ordinance be reviewed in 12 months.
Mayor Paulson opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on An Ordinance
Amending Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances Relating to Real Estate Signs at 7:42 p.m.
He inquired if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council.
Mr. John Kelly of the Building Owners and Managers Association expressed his and Mr.
Kent Warden's support of this ordinance and offered to answer any questions of the
Council.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to
close the public hearing at 7:43 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
ORDINANCE NO. 92 -13
Member Celia Scott introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 34 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES
RELATING TO REAL ESTATE SIGNS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by member Dave
Rosene, and the motion passed unanimously.
8/24/92 -7-
There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar
directing the Planning Commission to review Chapters 34 and 35 of the City Ordinances in
12 months regarding the effectiveness of the real estate sign ordinance provisions. The
motion passed unanimously.
Councilmember Cohen thanked Mr. Kelly and Mr. Warden for their work with the Planning
Commission.
The City Manager introduced An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances
Relating to Administrative Land Use Permits. He explained this ordinance was offered for
first reading on July 27, 1992, published in the City's official newspaper on August 5, 1992,
and is offered this evening for a second reading.
Mayor Paulson opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on An Ordinance
Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Relating to Administrative Land Use Permits
at 7:46 p.m. He inquired if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council.
No one appeared to speak, and he entertained a motion to close the public hearing.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to
close the public hearing at 7:46 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
ORDINANCE NO. 92 -14
Member Philip Cohen introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES
RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE PERMITS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by member Dave
Rosene, and the motion passed unanimously.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
PART -TIME COMMUNICATIONS COORDINATOR POSITION
The City Manager presented the part -time Communications Coordinator position to the
Council. He explained the Financial Task Force recommended against funding the position
in 1992 and suggested approval of it in 1993 only if there is an equivalent reduction in other
General Fund operating expenses. He stated the Communications Task Force is asking the
Council to reconsider funding the position in 1992. He indicated the 1993 budget proposal
will include the part -time Communications Coordinator as an annual expense of
approximately $21,000.
Councilmember Pedlar asked if the Council approves the part -time position, is the Council
circumventing the work of the Financial Commission. The City Manager replied yes it will.
8/24/92 -8 -
Councilmember Rosene stated the capital outlay s about $8,200, which is available right
Y g
now, and the labor cost will be about $3,200 in 1992. He asked staff if the $3,200 is
available. The City Manager responded affirmatively.
Councilmember Rosene went on to state it seems everything is now in place to get this up
and running. He noted there have been a number of times where a person in this position
would be an asset to the City. Councilmember Cohen stated if the position is approved to
begin in 1992, there is the assumption it will be approved in the 1993 proposed budget. He
asked where this person will be housed and if it is possible to contract this position with
another city. The City Manager replied yes, the City is looking into contracting with another
city,
Councilmember Scott stated she has a problem with starting the position in 1992, but has
no problem approving it as a position in 1993.
There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
approve the creation of the position and the reallocation of the Capital Expenditure Funds
to purchase necessary office equipment and that this position be targeted to start in 1993.
Councilmember Pedlar stated he understood the Council was drawing conclusions about the
1993 budget. He further stated in reviewing the budget process the Council needs to
prioritize the staffing, programs and their functions. The Council has approved the concept
but is saying the communications position has more importance than other positions that
have been ear - marked for removal in 1993. The Council must look at the entire budget as
a whole. He explained the Council is making a decision tonight that one position is
approved and this is a mistake.
The City Manager explained it is his understanding the Council has approved the capital
outlay and is looking at the position early in the budget process. He further explained he
would not consider purchasing the equipment until the Council authorizes the position.
Councilmember Pedlar expressed concern about putting the cart before the horse -- one
cannot purchase furniture unless you are going to put someone in the furniture. We must
move this discussion through the budget process.
Councilmember Rosene asked how many positions are ear - marked to be cut. The City
Manager answered it is too early in the process to make that determination. The Finance
Commission has suggested 4 to 7 positions. Councilmember Rosene asked if these positions
are guaranteed to be cut. The City Manager answered some will probably be cut but there
is no guarantee.
Councilmember Rosene stated if, in the prioritization process, the Financial Commission
decided these positions should be cut, the Council must review and discuss this. He
reiterated the City does need a communications person.
8/24/92 -9-
Councilmember Pedlar stated it is incumbent upon the Council to know which jobs are being
considered for removal. Councilmember Rosene agreed it is necessary to know which
positions are being considered for removal.
Councilmember Scott suggested Councilmember Rosene withdraw his motion and substitute
a motion that would say that $8,500 be reserved in the 1992 budget for equipment if the
position is approved in the 1993 budget.
There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
withdraw the first motion, and substitute a motion to reserve $8,500 from the 1992 Capital
Outlay Budget for the purchase of start -up equipment if the Communications Coordinator
position is approved as part of the 1993 Budget. The motion passed unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF A NEIGHBORHOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The City Manager introduced a Resolution Authorizing Preliminary Consideration of a
Possible Neighborhood Street Improvement Program. He stated staff suggests the matter
of considering such improvements be referred to the Earle Brown Neighborhood Advisory
Committee.
Councilmember Pedlar thanked the Director of Public Works for providing the Council with
pictures of the streets involved.
Councilmember Cohen informed the Council he had toured the West and East Humboldt
areas where citizens had petitioned for street improvements in the 1960s. He suggesting
taking of h e area and interviewing g p t residents on their satisfaction wi
g th the project.
He asked staff to bring this information back to the next Council meeting in September.
Councilmember Scott suggested setting up meetings with residents in the Earle Brown
neighborhood.
The Director of Public Works informed the Council the subject has been discussed with the
Earle Brown Neighborhood Advisory Committee. The Earle Brown Neighborhood Advisory
Committee expressed an interest in expanding their committee b
p e 50 to 60 more g y e residents
of the S.E. neighborhood to explore this issue. The next meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m. on
Thursday, September 17 at Earle Brown Elementary School.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -208
Member Philip Cohen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION OF A POSSIBLE
NEIGHBORHOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Jerry
Pedlar, and the motion passed unanimously.
8/24/92 _10-
RECESS
The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 8:20 p.m. and reconvened at 8:35 p.m.
SELECTION COMMITTEE REPORT REGARDING PROPOSALS RECEIVED FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The City Manager explained the City Council adopted Resolution No. 92 -152 which formally
initiated the development of Brooklyn Center's Pavement Management Program. Proposals
were solicited from consulting firms and a selection committee was then appointed to review
the proposals. After conducting interviews, the selection committee recommended the firm
of Braun Intertec Pavement Inc.
Councilmember Pedlar asked if other cities using this system had been contacted. The
Director of Public Works stated the cities had been contacted and they were satisfied with
the systems.
Councilmember Scott stated she had never spoken for the high proposal before, however
Braun meets all the requirements. She further stated she believes this type of project is
necessary and it should be done correctly.
Mr. Erland Lukanen, from Braun Intertec Pavement Inc., presented an overview of what
pavement management is and answered questions of the Council.
The Director of Public Works explained the system will cost $56,000 initially and will
probably be updated after 4 to 5 years. Councilmember Cohen asked if the program will
assure that certain returns will be met. The Director of Public Works stated the program
will give the City the best opinion as how to spend the City's maintenance moneys in the
best way. The staff and Council will make the financial decisions.
Councilmember Pedlar stated the City would be spending $56,000 to effectively, over a
period of time, save money. He asked if staff or Braun could quantify how long this will
take. Councilmember Scott stated it is a program to help the City best analyze where its
money is best spent. It will contain basic information on our streets and enable us to make
sensible decisions.
Councilmember Pedlar agreed with Councilmember Scott in concept but stated he felt there
is a need to justify this expenditure. He asked if there is data available from other
communities to support and justify this system.
The City Manager stated the streets have been kept at a pretty good level, however with this
system staff believes it can be determined which roads should be reconstructed vs. general
maintenance repairs.
The Director of Public Works stated he is convinced by using this program the City can
recognize a pay -back by the reduction in costs of maintenance. He predicted a pay -back
time of two years.
8/24/92
Councilmember Pedlar stated he is not in any way disagreeing, but the City is talking about
an expenditure of $56,000 that needs to be quantified. He further stated it is incumbent
upon the Council to see data that supports the projected results.
Councilmember Cohen asked Councilmember Pedlar if he could move forward on this issue
this evening if staff agrees to provide information that supports their thesis. Councilmember
Pedlar answered he presumes the data is available and will approve contingent upon receipt
of this data.
I
Councilmember Cohen asked the City Manager and Director of Public Works what the
timeline is and if it must be completed before bad weather.
Mr. Lukanen responded for staff noting if Council waits until September, it can be done but
it is difficult in the fall with the leaves and impossible if it snows.
The City Manager suggested the Council authorize staff to proceed and to provide Council
with supporting data within the week, staff will then poll each Councilmember by phone and
if acceptable put it on the next Council agenda.
There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
approve the Resolution Accepting Proposal for Development of a Pavement Management
Program, Improvement Project No. 1992 -17, and Allocating Funds Therefore with the
contingency that the data on the pay -back as requested by Councilmember Pedlar be
provided to the Council and the Council be polled prior to next Council meeting for
approval at the September 14, 1992, City Council meeting. The motion passed unanimously.
STAFF REPORT REGARDING DEVELOPMENT OF AN AREA EMERGENCY
RESPONSE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
The City Manager presented the staff report regarding development of an area emergency
response traffic management system. He explained the North Medical Transportation
Services has been in contact with City representatives to discuss possible installation of an
Emergency Vehicle Priority System on traffic signals and emergency vehicles in the
northwest metro area including the cities of Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Crystal,
Golden Valley, Maple Grove, Minneapolis, New Hope, Plymouth and Robbinsdale.
Councilmember Rosene asked if there is much of a chance that partial funding will be
attained.
The City Manager explained North Medical Transportation Services plans to submit an
application for a federal grant to cover all costs of installing an ERM system in the north
metro area.
8/24/92 - 12 -
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -209
Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO A JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR
THE INSTALLATION OF AN AREA WIDE EMERGENCY RESPONSE
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BY THE NORTH SUBURBAN REGIONAL EMERGENCY
RESPONSE NETWORK, AND ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1992-
23 FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF AN EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia
Scott, and the motion passed unanimously.
PROGRAM ALLOWING HIGH SCHOOL SENIORS TO SERVE AS NONVOTING
MEMBERS ON CITY ADVISORY COMMISSIONS AND CITY COUNCIL
The City Manager presented a program which will allow high school seniors the opportunity
to serve as nonvoting members on City advisory commissions and the City Council.
Councilmember Scott stated she thinks this would be a great experience for them; however,
the Council meetings get very involved and very tedious, and the Council would be unable
to stop and explain.
Councilmember Rosene asked if confidential materials would be made available to students.
He stated he likes the idea of having the students involved especially through City advisory
commissions.
Councilmember Cohen asked how it would work and stated it would be a good idea.
There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Cohen to
instruct staff to poll city advisory commissions and establish a program for Council review.
The motion passed unanimously.
Mayor Paulson asked that his intern be involved in this process.
There was a motion b Councilmember Rosene and seconded b Councilmember Y y Pedlar to
consider the issue of Council salaries next. The motion passed unanimously.
FINANCIAL TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION REGARDING CITY COUNCIL
SALARIES
Mr. Escher, Financial Commission Chairman, thanked the Council for their confidence in
the Financial Commission and explained the Financial Commission has not had time to
evaluate this matter but will take on the task. He further stated it is the unanimous feeling
of the Commission that this is not a second job and it is a service position. He requested
City staff to do research on whether other cities or municipalities have developed a salary
process that is fair for elected officials. He stated the minutes of the August 17, 1992,
8/24/92 - 13 -
meeting of the Financial Commission reflect; that the Commission again recommends the
salary compensation for the Mayor and City Council remain at the 1992 level.
Mr. Ted Willard, 6825 Drew Avenue, addressed the Council stating he had served on the
Council from 1962 to 1972. He explained he considered his service as voluntary in nature
and as having its own rewards.
Mayor Paulson recognized Mr. Dean Nyquist. Mr. Nyquist first read to the Council a
statement from Mr. Tony Kuefler, who was unable to attend the meeting, as follows:
"Having served 9 years on the Council myself, I have some opinions on the City
Council salary issue.
1. The salary should not be so high as to attract candidates primarily just for the
salary. In my opinion our community interests are better served by people
interested in lending their time and expertise as a community service, in much
the same manner as others volunteer their time to coach little league sports,
serve on church or community service organization boards, etc. I feel the
compensation should not be thought of as compensation for one's time, but
rather compensation to cover some personal expenses incurred as a result of
being a council person (i.e., mileage to and from council and commission
meetings, etc.).
2. I favor a small salary adjustment every couple of years, rather than no
adjustments -
e is for 6 8 ears then in f
] y going or a large adjustment.
Mr. Nyquist explained to the Council he also served as Mayor of Brooklyn Center but
without any compensation. He said he is not suggesting this, but a Councilmember should
not rely on the salary as a second income. It is a public service and should not be relied on
as an additional income.
Councilmember Pedlar thanked the Financial Commission for doing a fine job. He
recommended the Council adopt Draft B as an amendment which will rescind the adopted
salary increases scheduled to take affect on January 1, 1992, and provides for continuance
of the current salaries for Mayor and Council.
Councilmember Scott agreed to rescinding the salary increase; however, she stated the
Council needs to come up with a plan for Council salary increases for the future. She would
like to work with the Financial Commission to come up with something so the Council does
not have to go through this so many times.
Councilmember Rosene stated when the Council was discussing the salary levels of the
department heads, it wanted to be careful not to send the wrong message. The Council
wanted to give some increase because not to would be telling the department heads they are
doing a poor job. Now the Council is doing that to itself. The Commission is not saying
8/24/92 -14-
the Council does not need an increase, it is saying it does not have enough information. He
stated he personally would like to give them some testimony. He asked if the Financial
Commission would find it egregious to ask residents to pay a nickel more for a 5 percent
increase each year which would still leave the Council $287.50 below what the average is
right now. He stated the Council was remiss in the original amount and he apologizes for
that. He suggested passing something small now, such as a 5 percent increase. He stated
he is just asking for what is fair, not to get rich.
Councilmember Pedlar acknowledged the remarks made by Councilmembers Rosene and
Scott. He noted it is important to remember the Council is not grossly underpaid. The
message the Council has sent to our citizens is that the Council is "gravy." It spends a great
deal of time looking at City employee's salaries, and as the Council looks at employee
salaries, he is sure they have many difficulties getting the things they need. He stated the
Council should send back a message that it agrees with the Financial Commission, resolve
this issue and move forward. He stated he will not debate a 5 percent increase and he is
looking for a recommendation from the Financial Commission.
Councilmember Rosene stated he does not agree with the Financial Commission.
Councilmember Pedlar reiterated his agreement with the Financial Commission
recommendation. He further stated the Council needs to develop criteria and to develop
what the job is worth.
Councilmember Rosene stated if the Council does not act before November, it will be
January 1995 before any changes can be made and that would put an unnecessary burden
on the Council to make up for lost time.
Mr. Escher stated he had hoped he was very direct and the Council would understand
clearly what the Commission was saying. The Council is responsible to the citizens. What
it did was egregious. The Financial Commission had concerns about no action until 1995
and the Council is responsible for their own compensation.
Councilmember Rosene asked if the Council is going to beat themselves to death over this.
Mayor Paulson asked what percentage the increases are. Mr. Escher - answered
approximately 50 percent.
Mayor Paulson stated in the past the Council voted itself a salary increase. Now it must
look at to what extent it is going to reduce the current level by and the Council must
formulate a long -term salary policy.
Mr. Escher reiterated the official position of the Financial Commission is for Council to
retain its current salary levels.
Councilmember Pedlar asked if, in fact, the Council were to pass a resolution, could there
be a stipulation to move it on for a second reading based on criteria and recommendation
of the Financial Commission. The City Manager answered the Council must establish a
dollar amount.
8/24/92 -15 -
Councilmember Pedlar asked if the Council develops an acceptable method for increasing
salaries, can salaries then be increased as agreed by the Council and Financial Commission
on January 1, 1994.
The City Attorney stated he did not think this is possible. The City Charter states salaries
are fixed by ordinance. No change in salary takes effect until after a municipal election.
A salary increase must be done before the next election.
There was a motion by Mayor Paulson to reduce the Mayor's salary by 50 percent and the
Councilmembers' salaries by 45 percent from the current ordinance level which is effective
January 1, 1993. The motion died for lack of a second.
Councilmember Scott asked if the proper action would be to rescind the Ordinance and then
propose a new Ordinance. The City Attorney answered the proper procedure is to amend
the Ordinance.
Councilmember Pedlar asked to make a comment on Mayor Paulson's motion. The
employees received a 2.9 percent salary increase and he felt strongly the Council should back
the Financial Commission recommendation. He did not think 5 percent is acceptable. He
could accept a 2.9 percent increase.
Councilmember Cohen stated a month ago the Council had a motion to rescind and it was
tabled for Financial Commission review. He further stated he would like to take action to
roll the salaries back and put the issue to a public hearing.
There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to
accept the report of the Financial Commission with thanks. The motion passed
unanimously.
Councilmember Scott asked Councilmember Pedlar if he would be comfortable rescinding
the Ordinance and
approving a 2.5 percent raise in 1993 and a 2.5 percent raise f or 1 994.
p o
r � r r
She further stated the Council needs to put a nominal raise in place to avoid this problem
in the future.
There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Mayor Paulson to remove
from the table the discussion of Council Salaries. The motion passed unanimously.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Mayor Paulson to rescind the
salary increase and to recommend a 2.5 percent salary increase in 1993 and a 2.5 percent
salary increase in 1994 subject to the City Council and Financial Commission developing a
plan for the future.
Mr. Escher stated that percentage increases are very misleading. He suggested looking at
a just salary for this day and age and giving a flat dollar increase.
8/24/92 - 16-
There was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
amend the motion to: Ordinance is amended to provide for the Mayor and Councilmembers
an increase of $150.00 effective January 1, 1993 and an increase of $150 over that effective
January 1, 1994. The motion passed unanimously.
Denis Kelly asked that the minutes clarify the exact amount the salaries will be.
Councilmember Rosene answered effective January 1, 1993, Councilmembers' salaries will
be $5,150, and effective January 1, 1994, the pay will be $5,300.00.
Councilmember Pedlar stated the Mayor's salary effective January 1, 1993 will be $7,150.00
and effective January 1, 1994 will be $7,300.
SAFETY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
The City Manager explained the employee safety committee has recommended the
scheduling of two training programs for City personnel that are not included in the 1992
budget. The City Council is being asked to consider approving funding for these programs.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -210
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1992 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO TRANSFER
FUNDS TO PROVIDE TRAINING AND PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
FOR EMPLOYEES AT RISK OF EXPOSURE TO BLOODBORNE PATHOGENS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Dave
Rosene, and the motion passed unanimously.
The City Manager introduced a Resolution Amending the 1992 General Fund Budget to
Transfer Funds to Provide Training on Defensive Driving. He stated the safety committee
has also recommended that the City should schedule defensive driving training for those City
employees who regularly drive City vehicles or their own vehicles while conducting City
business.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -211
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1992 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO TRANSFER
FUNDS TO PROVIDE TRAINING ON DEFENSIVE DRIVING
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Dave
Rosene, and the motion passed unanimously.
8/24/92 -17-
1993 PRELIMINARY PROPOSED BUDGET
TO ADOPT THE 1993 PRELIMINARY PROPOSED BUDGET
The City Manager presented the Preliminary Proposed Budget for 1993. He explained the
proposed budget is designed to give the City Council sufficient information to establish a
preliminary 1993 property tax levy and budget total by September 15, 1992, the certification
deadline.
The Finance Director reviewed the proposed budget and answered questions of the Council.
I
The City Manager stated he will have a schedule to the Councilmembers by next week and
would also like to set up budget review work sessions.
Councilmember Cohen stated he would like to have staff take a look at the code
enforcement and inspection fees as a way of generating more revenue.
Mayor Paulson expressed concern over an 8 percent increase in the tax levy.
Councilmember Pedlar noted the levy amount cannot be increased after September 15,
however, it can be decreased. Councilmember Rosene estimated the increase will cost the
average homeowner about $2.32 per month.
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -212
Member Philip Cohen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
i
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1993 PRELIMINARY PROPOSED BUDGET
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia
Scott, and the motion passed unanimously.
I
RESOLUTION U ON NO. 92-213
Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A PRELIMINARY PROPOSED TAX LEVY FOR
1993 BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Philip Cohen. The motion passed. Mayor Paulson voted nay.
8/24/92 -18 -
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -214
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROPOSED TAX - CAPACITY LEVY FOR THE
PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COST OF OPERATION, PROVIDING
INFORMATIONAL SERVICE, AND RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PURSUANT TO
THE PROVISIONS OF MSA 469.001 THROUGH 469.047 OF THE HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FOR
THE YEAR 1993
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Dave
Rosene. The motion passed. Mayor Paulson voted nay.
PLACEMENT OF 1% FOOD AND LIQUOR TAX QUESTION ON NOVEMBER 3
1992, GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT
The City Manager presented the Placement of 1% Food and Liquor Tax Question on
November 3, 1992, General Election Ballot. He presented the following revised schedule
for Council consideration:
1. Establishment of the date of the public hearing (a public hearing is not
required for this purpose but we recommend your consideration);
2. Public hearing notification process;
3. A process for polling City Council and Legislative candidates on their
attitudes and opinions regarding this issue;
4. Direction to staff on the type of informational campaign the Council wishes
to consider should they place the question on the ballot; and
5. Any other questions or concerns the Council may wish to consider.
The City Manager further stated the next meeting of the Chamber of Commerce is
scheduled for September 10.
Councilmember Cohen stated the Council should move forward. He further stated the
Council did pass a resolution encouraging Representative Carruthers to pursue this tax. He
noted the Council has an obligation to move it along and get it on the ballot.
Mayor Paulson stated he liked that the citizens will decide to impose the tax, and supports
it placement on the ballot.
There was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
approve the revised schedule (as listed above). The motion passed unanimously.
There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
establish a public hearing date of September 14, 1992. The motion passed unanimously.
8/24/92 - 19 -
There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Scott
directing staff to send a letter to candidates and follow -up with a phone call. The motion
passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE
OF MINNESOTA FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING THE FIRST STAGE OF
A FOUR -CITY BUSINESS RETENTION AND LOCAL MARKET EXPANSION PILOT
PROJECT
There was a motion by Mayor Paulson and seconded by Councilmember Rosene to
reconsider Item IIh of the Consent Agenda, and the motion passed unanimously.
There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
table the Resolution Authorizing Execution of Agreement with the State of Minnesota for
the Purpose of Conducting the First Stage of a Four -City Business Retention and Local
Market Expansion Pilot Project until such time as the EDA Coordinator has satisfied Mayor
Paulson's questions about this issue and then direct staff to poll the Council on this issue
and then authorize for signature. The motion passed. Councilmember Cohen abstained.
RESOLUTIONS (Continued)
The City Manager introduced a Resolution Calling Special Election for Submission of
Proposed Amendments to City Charter and Fixing Form of Ballots, November 3, 1992. He
presented three options for wording on the ballot:
Option I: Shall the proposed Charter Amendment be adopted?
Option II: Shall the proposed Charter Amendment which was published in the
official newspaper ews er on 1992 and
P
P ,
1992 be adopted?
Option III: Shall the proposed Charter Amendment relating to the procedure for
filling vacancies on the City Council by appointment or by special
election be adopted?
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -205
Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS TO CITY CHARTER AND FIXING FORM OF BALLOTS,
NOVEMBER 3, 1992.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia
Scott.
Mayor Paulson stated the Council needs to be even more specific in the language of the
ballot.
8/24/92 -20-
There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
amend the motion by removing "by appointment or by special election be adopted" from the
language of Option 3. The motion passed unanimously.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to
approve the motion as amended. The motion passed unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar, and seconded by Councilmember Rosene
to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City
Council adjourned at 12:15 a.m.
Deputy City Clerk Todd Paulson, Mayor
Recorded and transcribed by:
Nancy Berg
Northern Counties Secretarial Services
8/24/92 - 21 -