Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1994 03-28 EDAP Regular Session
EDA AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MARCH 28, 1994 (will reconvene EDA meeting after adjournment of City Council meeting) 1. Call to Order r , 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda -All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the Economic Development Authority and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 4. Approval of Minutes: * a. March 14, 1994 - Regular Session.` — °" 5. Resolutions: Of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, Requesting the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to Call for v -° a Public Hearing on the Modification of the Redevelopment Plan for the Earle ' Brown Farm Redevelopment Project Which Expands the Geographic Area Which Will Include the Geographic Area of Existing Housing Development Project No. O1 and Adds Additional "Housing " Powers ' t * b. Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for Asbestos Abatement at Willow River " Apartments, the EDA Owned Property Located at 6525, 6527 and 6529 Willow Lane North Designating the City's Northeast Neighborhood for Purpose of Focusing Resources Under the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's Community Rehabilitation Fund ' Program * d. Authorizing President and Executive Director to Enter Into a Grant Agreement with the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for the Community Rehabilitation Fund Program * e. Accepting Proposal from Maxfield Research Group, Inc. for a Market Study for Moderate Rent Senior Housing in the Willow Lane Area of Brooklyn Cen : �r and Authorizing the President and Executive Director to Enter Into a Contract for Professional Services * f. Accepting Proposal from Maxfield Research Group, Inc. for a Market Study for a Retail Center in the 69th Avenue /Brooklyn Boulevard Area of Brooklyn Center and Authorizing the President and Executive Director to Enter Into a Contract for Professional Services CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- March 28, 1994 * g. Authorizing the Acquisition of Certain Real Property Within the City of Brooklyn Center and Establishing Offer of Just Compensation for Said Property Located at z 6933 Brooklyn Boulevard in Brooklyn Center if n' Y 6. Adjournment CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Meeting Date March Agcnda Item Number 7 �/ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: EDA MINUTES - MARCH 14, 1994 - REGULAR SESSION DEPT. APPROVAL: Brad Hoffman, EVector of Community Development MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECON MENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) e RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION • MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION MARCH i 14, 1994 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in regular session and was called to order by President Todd. Paulson at 8:32 p.m. ROLL CALL President Todd Paulson, Commissioners Celia Scott, Dave Rosene, Barb Kailigher, and Kristen Mann, Also present were City Manager Herald Splinter, Community Development Specialist Torn Bublitz, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Council Secretary Kathy Stratton, APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA President Paulsen inquired if any Commissioner requested any items be removed from the consent agenda, Commissioner Mann requested item 5a be removed from the consent agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FEBRUARY 28, 1994 - REC`ULAR SESSION There was a motion by Commissioner Scott and secuiidcd by Commissioner Rosene to approve the minutes of the Febaiary 28, 1994, EDA meeting as printed. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTIONS The City Manager presented a resolution Approving One (1) Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority Grant (File No, H -117 [804311). Councilmember Mann explained although she has no problem going ahead with this she wanted a few things clarified in her mind. She wanted to know if this project takes the full $15,000 to he brought up to Section 8 standards, then would that cut money from the number of other properties that can be worked on this year. 5/14/93 - 1 - The Community Development Specialist said Section 8 standards allow considerable latitude, but the main goal of these standards is to make a housee liveable. There was a motion by Commissioner Mann and seconded by Commissioner Kallibher to approve the resolution contingent on the bids of contractors coming in under $15,000. Commissioner Mann asked what would happen if contractors are not able to bring the house up to the standards in $15,000 or less. The Community Development Specialist said that is a dilemma which has not happened heforc, He. said the house is one that could bG up for future acquisition. Commissioner Rosene said obviously the homeowner made a risky investment buying the property. He said if the homeowner applies for a grant and the City turns it down, possibly it could be called blighted property. The Community Development Specialist said that was an option, but the action tonight allows the City to take bids and see what the cast will bc, Commissioner Scott said in a case where the grant is worth a great percentage of the value of the home, the program is not helpful, especially if the house won't last much longer even after improvements, She - she has a problern spending $15,000 on a property with this low a value. Commissioner Rosene made a statemc t which n he called a political one. He said this is a c good example of how the Community pays when someone is forced to live on too low of an income. Mayor Paulson commented if the bids come in higher than $15,000, possibly the outside repairs could be made more of a priority than inside repairs. The Community Development Specialist agreed and stated that would be up to the building inspector. Mayor Paulson added it would be good for the FDA to take another look at this property situation after the bids have came Lack. The motion by Commissioner Mann and seconded by Commissioner Kalligher is now to allow estimates on the cost of repairs to the property and bring the information back to the EDA for reconsideration. 'The Community Development Specialist said this is one of the top three items for the Housing Commission's consideration at its next meeting, as well as the issue of pozmibly extending the lien period Qa homes, Mayor Paulson offered an amendment to the motion for the issue to come beck to the EDA after estimates are received, and between that time the EDA should discuss related issues 5/10/93 - 2 - such as lien period, value of property vs. cost of improvements, etc. The amended motion passed unanimously, The Community Development Specialist stated the Housing Commission could do some of the homework on this issue if that is the wish of the EDA. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Rosene and seconded by Commissioner Scutt to adjourn the meeting, The motion passed unanimously, The Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority adjourned at 8:50 p.m, Todd Paulson, President Recorded and transcribed by: Kathy Stratton TinicSavcr Off Site Secretarial 5/10/93 - 3 - CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 3/28/94 Agenda It. Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA, REQUESTING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TO CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MODIFICATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE EARLE BROWN FARM REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHICH EXPANDS THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA WHICH WILL INCLUDE THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF EXISTING HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 01 AND ADDS ADDITIONAL "HOUSING" POWERS DEPT. APPROVAL: Tom B blitz, Community Development Specialist ,� ., /i ! ;,.y 3 r� MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECONEWENDATION: x,� , i '" " "' V • No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached X ) At the February 22, 1994 special City Council meeting, the City Council authorized staff to prepare the necessary documents to expand the City's redevelopment project area to include a larger area of the City. This EDA resolution requests the City Council to call for a public hearing to expand the boundaries of the Earle Brown Farm redevelopment project area to include almost the entire area of the City of Brooklyn Center. A map of the area to be excluded from the redevelopment project area is included with this memorandum. The sequence of actions on this issue require that the EDA first request the City Council to call for a public hearing and then for the Council to actually call and schedule the public hearing. By expanding the redevelopment project area to include the major part of the City, it would increase the City's ability to use financial tools such as tax increment financing on various future and potential redevelopment projects within the City. In short, it provides the greatest flexibility in terms of redevelopment, including residential, commercial and industrial. Also, by creating housing and redevelopment project areas, it would increase the overall authority of the project area to address housing and redevelopment issues. The expansion would also allow the City to share resources from present and future tax increment financing districts, allow for more effective overall redevelopment planning, increase the housing powers of the district and enable the City to use additional financing tools in redevelopment. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, Requesting the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to Call for a Public Hearing on the Modification of the Redevelopment Plan for the Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project Which Expands the Geographic Area Which Will Include the Geographic Area of Existing Housing Development Project No. 01 and Adds Additional "Housing" Powers � g g P J g • �► 111 /111111 / /11■ 8111 111 /1 /1IIIt�J■ 1�11 11/ 111//1111111111 11 1111111111111■ ° 111 /111 /11/1■ �ml111911 11111■ �, rr' 1111 11. //11111111 : ■�I;ii � 4 � � = �� :111111 ■::: '::.'•� — • , : 1111//; ::: ■: ■ �, .. i � ■11 " (I- :: - -11111 11111, . 11 /1111 � ,:. , ■ :.. ■ ■ �1lIL�11l1■ 111 /1111 -• • -� -� = /� 1111 111 1�• ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ / �- 111/1111111., /1/11 Ilj - - — • _ `'� (� 1111 1 1 ► ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦� ♦ ♦ ♦�� . , � = _ ,. � .� /�///. �11 / //1 ■ , ♦ .. ♦ ■ .., 1► I,�! 1111111 � ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ; : ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦� ...,.,,, ...,■ 11i11111ao ;IImr������� ,.,. ♦ ' ♦ 111 /1111111► ■ �It11� ■ 11111 �� . ,, ` 11� 1111111 �� ♦� ♦�� " � ♦� ♦�� 1 ■ - ■1 ■ ■1 1111 ,1111111, ■� ��� -�.� , . 111■ � ► ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦� 111 IIi� ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ��/111 �- i11 ■11i� �1 /111 ■■ 11 1111 111111 // ■■ ► ►♦♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦t 1 //1 1 //1 a_a; 1 111 /11 i 1� 1111 ♦ ♦ ♦�� ♦ ♦,:� ■11/ ���►�� ■ /� ■ �_��® ►� ♦� ♦� ♦��''. 1111 !1111/11 �I/ /111 111111 ;�►© � 11 - ��.- ,1111111 ■1111111//1/111r ��♦ , �� , , �/1 /111/ �Ii�11 // 1�1 ,1 11 �"""' /1 11 111■ � 111111 �''� ■�1///1 �:♦ ; 4 :�►� ' '� I ' 111 • "-�' ■11111111 11111■ �♦ ' .�► •�_ � 11/ I/1 x /11/111 111111 11111. 11�� :1//1 11■ �.. - � -� -• 11 111 111111 111111■u I 1111/11111 �►�.• '' 0■ ■ ■■ ,��■� �� ' / Bil 11/ � / - - -� .11111 �1 /1111...,, . -� 1■ 1 ♦ .�.M 111111 y 111111/11 IIr��� 111 11/ G 11111 G1111/ /1■ �`' 11 ■ � � � 11111111 1111111 �111�� ■111 ■1111 �. �. , ° 1111 —"' 1 11 X/1 /11/ 111111 / 11■ �1,,_ 111111 111111..1' ■ 11111111111111."' �r 1111 ■� F _ 111111111 11� � � _ 11 °. , 1�_�::- �i ? ��n �iii11 ° ■ � 11� \ ■11 /11111 '� '� ���� ���I� �••,I� 111 � . Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA, REQUESTING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TO CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MODIFICATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE EARLE BROWN FARM REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHICH EXPANDS THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA WHICH WILL INCLUDE THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF EXISTING HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 01 AND ADDS ADDITIONAL "HOUSING" POWERS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS (the "Board") OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA (the "Authority ") AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City Council (the "Council ") of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (the "City ") created its Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.001 through 469.047, inclusive, as amended, in an effort to encourage the development and redevelopment of certain designated areas within the City; and WHEREAS, the Authority proposes to modify the Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan ") for the Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 469.001 through 469.047, inclusive, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the board of Commissioners of the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Authority hereby requests that the Council call for a public hearing to consider the proposed modifications to the Plan on April 25, 1994, and to cause notice of said public hearing to be given as required by law. 2. The Authority directs the Executive Director to transmit copies of the Plan to the Planning Commission of the City and requests the Planning Commissioner's written opinion indicating whether the proposed modifications to the Plan are in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, prior to the date of the public hearing to be called by the Council. 3. The Executive Director of the Authority is hereby directed to submit a copy of the Plan to the Council for its approval. EDA Resolution No. 4. The Authority directs the Executive Director to transmit the Plan to the school district in which the Earle Brown Farm Tax Increment Financing District and Tax Increment Financing District No. 01 are located and to the County not later than 30 days prior to the public hearing. Date Todd Paulson, President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Camcd Meeting Date 3/28 /% Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ASBESTOS ABATEMENT AT WILLOW RIVER APARTMENTS, THE EDA OWNED PROPERTY AT 6525, 6527 AND 6529 WILLOW LANE NORTH DEPT. APPROVAL: Tom Bu litz, Community Development pecialist X. MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below PP attached P below/ attached EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached X ) The bid opening for the asbestos abatement project at the EDA owned property at 6525, 6527 and 6529 Willow Lane North (Willow River Apartments) was held on March 23, 1994. The low bidder on the asbestos abatement project is SafeAir Systems, with a bid of $41,667. The estimate prepared by Environmental Process, Inc., the City's consultant on this project, was $52,000. The bids ranged from the low of $41,667 to $79,882. After discussing this with the representative from EPI, Inc., he indicated that with asbestos abatement projects it is not unusual to see a range of bids such as this. EPI staff has worked with SafeAir Systems on other asbestos abatement projects and are comfortable with the bid and also the contractor. A letter from EPI, Inc. regarding the recommendation for contract award is included with this memorandum. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for Asbestos Abatement at Willow River Apartments, the EDA Owned Property Located at 6525, 6527 and 6529 Willow Lane North. s B ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS, INCORPORATED 1220 Glenwood Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 -612- 377 -8316 • Fax 612 - 377 --4984 ePL March 23, 1994 Mr. Total Bublitz Economic Development Authority In. and For the City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Re: Willow River Apartments Asbestos Abatement EPI #93-577 Dear Mr. Bublitz Environmental Process, Isac., (EPI), has reviewed the bid results for the Willow River Apartments Asbestos Abatement project. We reconu -rend that the bid of S41,667A0 fronl Safe Air Systems, Inc., be accepted. Safe Air Systems, Inc., is a qualified bidder. The budget figure for the asbestos abatement portion of the project was 552,000 for this item. If you have any questions, please contact Micliael Berreau or nee at (612) 377 -8316. Sincerely ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS, INC. c _x_ 5 S 12i cott orton, IH Project Manager NAS Enclosure: Safe Air Systems, Inc., Bidder Qualification Submittal Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ASBESTOS ABATEMENT AT WILLOW RIVER APARTMENTS, THE EDA OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6525, 6527 AND 6529 WILLOW LANE NORTH WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for asbestos abatement at 6525, 6527 and 6529 Willow Lane North (Willow River Apartments), Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, the following bids were received, opened and tabulated by a representative of the Community Development Director on the 23rd day of March, 1994: BIDDER BID AMOUNT RemCon, Inc. $59,000 SafeAir Systems 41,667 National Surface Cleaning 79,882 Envirobate 78,750 Valley Contracting 72,399 Mavo Systems 55,013 WHEREAS, it appears that SafeAir Systems has submitted the lowest responsible bid for asbestos abatement at 6525, 6527 and 6529 Willow Lane North. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center that: 1. The EDA President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute a contract with SafeAir, Inc. for asbestos abatement at 6525, 6527 and 6529 Willow Lane North (Willow River Apartments) in the amount of $41,667. 2. All costs associated with the project shall be accounted for in the EDA special operating fund. Date Todd Paulson, President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 3/28/% Agenda Item Number —5 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: DESIGNATING THE CITY'S NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PURPOSE OF FOCUSING RESOURCES UNDER THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY'S COMMUNITY REHABILITATION FUND PROGRAM DEPT. APPROVAL: Tom Bublitz, Co unity Develo ent Specialist MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECONEMENDATION. eAr— V No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached • SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached X ) The Brooklyn Center EDA has been awarded a $275,000 grant from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency under the Community Rehabilitation Fund Program. Applications were received for this grant program across the state and were awarded on a competitive basis. A summary of the cities awarded grants under this program is included with this memorandum. The proposed use of the grant funds are for acquisition of property in the Willow Lane area. One of the requirements of the Community Rehabilitation Fund Program is the designation, by resolution, of a neighborhood in which the grant funds will be spent. The Willow Lane area is in the City's northeast neighborhood and, as required by the MHFA grant program, the resolution designates the City's northeast neighborhood as the designated area in which the grant funds will be used. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution Designating the City's Northeast Neighborhood for Purpose of Focusing Resources Under the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's Community Rehabilitation Fund Program. Applications selected under the Community Rehabilitation Fund Program: Ot'c Or. anizatian Am8unt ]und`ed Austin HRA $50,000.00 • Austin Pines Apartment Complex Bloomington HRA $100,000.00 Dakota County HRA $90,000.00 • City of West St. Paul City of Golden Valley $ 100,000.00 City of Hendrum $60,000.00 City of Little Falls $75,000.00 City of Madelia $60,000.00 City of Red Wing $100,000.00 • Downtown Revitalization Project City of Richfield $49,500.00 South St. Paul HRA $62,600.00 Beltrami HRA $152,400.00 Brainerd HRA $200,000.00 Brooklyn Center EDA $275,000.00 St. Cloud HRA $200,000.00 • Area #1 City of St. Paul $200,000.00 • Oakdale Development Tracy EDA $275,000.00 i Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE CITY'S NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD FOR PURPOSES OF FOCUSING RESOURCES UNDER THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY'S COMMUNITY REHABILITATION FUND PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center (EDA) has been awarded $275,000 in grant funds under the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's (MHFA's) Community Rehabilitation Fund Program; and WHEREAS, the Community Rehab Fund Program requires the EDA to designate a specific City neighborhood within which the grant funds may be used; and WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center EDA desires to use the Community Rehabilitation Program grant funds for eligible redevelopment activities in the City's northeast neighborhood, the boundaries of which are described as: I -94/I -694 on the south, Shingle Creek on the west, 73rd Avenue North (the border with Brooklyn Park) on the north, and the Mississippi River on the east. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center that the northeast neighborhood of the City of Brooklyn Center, as described in this resolution, shall be the designated neighborhood within which the Community Rehabilitation Grant funds will be used. Date Todd Paulson, President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Coamcil Mewing Date 3/28/94 Agenda Item Number -5 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: AUTHORIZING PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO A GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY FOR THE COMMUNITY REHABILITATION FUND PROGRAM DEPT. APPROVAL: To Bm blitz, Commuraty Development Specialist MANAGERS REVIEW/RECOM IENDATION. No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached • SUMrvIARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached X ) Approval of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's Community Rehabilitation Fund Grant Agreement is required in order to receive the $275,000 awarded to the EDA under the grant program. Upon execution of the grant agreement by the EDA, MHFA will disburse the $275,000 to the EDA for use in the designated area. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution Authorizing President and Executive Director to Enter Into a Grant Agreement with the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for the Community Rehabilitation Fund Program. MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY COMMUNITY REHABILITATION FUND PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT THIS GRANT AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between BrooklIn Center Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center (hereinafter "Grantee "), with its principal place of business located at 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center MN 55430 and the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (hereinafter "MHFA "), with its office at 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101- 1998. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, MHFA, under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462A.206, is authorized to make grants to cities for their use in providing loans or grants for the purposes of construction, acquisition, rehabilitation, demolition, permanent financing, refinancing or gap financing of single or multi - family housing, and WHEREAS, Grantee desires to participate in the MHFA Community Rehabilitation Fund Program (hereinafter the "Program ") wherein MHFA will make a grant to Grantee for financing eligible Program activities, as set forth in the Community Rehabilitation Fund Program Procedural Manual (hereinafter the "Procedural Manual ") and the Grantee's Grant Application to MHFA (hereinafter the "Grant Application "), the provisions of which are incorporated by reference into this instrument as if set forth in full herein; and WHEREAS, MHFA and Grantee desire to enter into an agreement to allow the Grantee to participate in the Program in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth below, in the Grant Application, and in the provisions of the Procedural Manual. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants hereinafter contained and the mutual benefits to be derived therefrom, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. Grantee represents and warrants that it is a City as such term is defined in the Procedural Manual, and further acknowledges that all of the warranties set forth therein shall be applicable to each Loan or City Grant made by the Grantee or Program Administrator, as such terms are defined in the Procedural Manual. 2. All transactions between MHFA and Grantee pursuant to this Grant Agreement are on a contract basis, the contract consisting of (a) this Grant Agreement, (b) the Grant Application, and (c) the provisions and requirements contained in the Procedural Manual, with all amendments and supplements thereto (hereinafter collectively the "Contract Documents "). 3. Neither party may assign its rights or obligations under the Contract Documents. No change or modification of the terms or provisions of the Contract Documents shall be binding on MHFA unless such change or modification be in writing and is signed by an authorized official of MHFA. Neither the failure by MHFA in any one or more instance to insist upon the observance or performance of any term or provision hereof, nor the failure of MHFA to exercise any right, privilege, or remedy conferred hereunder or afforded by law, shall be construed as waiving any breach of such term, provision, or the right to exercise such right, privilege or remedy thereafter. The Contract Documents embody the entire agreement between MHFA and the Grantee, and there are no other agreements, either oral or written, between the parties on the subject matter hereof. Community Rehabilitation Fund Program 1 3/4/94 Grant Agreement CRF Grant Agrmnt 4. This Grant Agreement shall terminate and end upon the final disbursement by Grantee or Program Administrator of all funds received by Grantee under this Grant Agreement for eligible purposes, or June 30, 1995, whichever occurs first. However, funds returned to the Grantee or its Program Administrator by Eligible Mortgagors, as such terms are defined in the Procedural Manual, whether in the form of loan repayments or otherwise, will continue to be governed by the Procedural Manual in effect at the end of such term, and may be re- directed by the Grantee for Program purposes as provided in the Procedural Manual. 5. All matters, whether sounding in tort or in contract, relating to the validity, construction, performance, or enforcement of the Contract Documents shall be determined according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. 6. If any term or provision of the Contract Documents is finally determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the remaining terms and provisions shall remain in full force and effect, and they shall be interpreted, performed, and enforced as if said invalid provision did not appear therein. 7. The Grant Agreement shall be effective only upon delivery by MHFA of a fully executed copy of this Grant Agreement to Grantee. 8. The Legislative Auditor for the State of Minnesota, the MHFA, or their representatives, shall have the right to examine books, records, documents, and other evidence and accounting procedures and practices relative to the Program, and the Grantee shall make available at reasonable times proper facilities for such examination and audit. 9. Grantee may cancel this Grant Agreement upon ten days written notice and return of unexpended Grant proceeds, and earnings thereon, to MHFA. 10. MHFA may suspend or cancel this Grant Agreement according to the provisions of Section 3.4 of the Procedural Manual for failure of the Grantee to comply with any warranties, or if funding for the Program is rescinded by the Minnesota Legislature. 11. The full grant amount of $ 275.000.00 will be disbursed to the Grantee within three (3) weeks of execution of this Grant Agreement by MHFA and receipt by MHFA of deposit instructions adequate to effect a transfer of funds from MHFA to the Grantee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantee has set its hand this day of ,19 IN THE PRESENCE OF: GRANTEE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER By: (Signature of Authorized Officer) Todd Paulson (Printed or Typewritten Name of Authorized Officer) Its: President Grantee's Telephone Number: By: Gerald G. Splinter Its: Executive Director Community Rehabilitation Fund Program 2 314/94 Grant Agreement CRF Grant Agrmnt IN THE PRESENCE OF: MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY By: James A. Cegla, Director Home Improvement Programs Signed this day of ' 19 Community Rehabilitation Fund Program 3 3/4/94 Grant Agreement CRF Grant Agrmnt -5� Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO A GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY FOR THE COMMUNITY REHABILITATION FUND PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center has been awarded $275,000 under the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's (MHFA's) Community Rehabilitation Fund Program; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency requires execution of a MHFA Community Rehabilitation Fund Program Grant Agreement prior to disbursement of grant funds to grant recipients. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center that the President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Community Rehabilitation Fund Program Grant Agreement on behalf of the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center. Date Todd Paulson, President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 3/2 Agenda It= Number ^� REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 0 ITEM DESCRIPTION: ACCEPTING PROPOSAL FROM MAXFIELD RESEARCH GROUP, INC. FOR A MARKET STUDY FOR MODERATE RENT SENIOR HOUSING IN THE WILLOW LANE AREA OF BROOKLYN CENTER AND AUTHORIZING THE PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEPT. APPROVAL: t Tom BAlitz, Community Development Spe alist MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECONMENDATION: J No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached X ) At the February 22, 1994 special City Council meeting, the City Council authorized staff to obtain a proposal from Maxfield Research Group, Inc. for a market study for senior housing in the Willow Lane area. The proposal from Maxfield Research Group, included with this memorandum, is for a market analysis of senior housing options for the Willow Lane area. The study will quantify demand for senior housing in Brooklyn Center through the year 2000 and, as such, can also be used when considering the potential for senior housing in the 69th and Brooklyn Boulevard redevelopment area. The study will specifically address the demand for senior households with moderate incomes (no more than 115% of the median income in the metropolitan area) and will include an analysis of the site of the proposed project. The conclusions section of the report will compare the two areas being considered for senior housing, noting the strengths and weaknesses of each area. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution Accepting Proposal from Maxfield Research Group, Inc. for a Market Study for Moderate Rent Senior Housing in the Willow Lane Area of Brooklyn Center and Authorizing the President and Executive Director to Enter Into a Contract for • Professional Services. M 4 ,XFIELD i RE SFARCH GRO March 10, 1994 1C. Mr. Tom Bublitz Community Development Specialist City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Dear Mr. Bublitz: Thank you for contacting Maxfield Research Group, Inc. to submit proposals regard- ing the potential for retail and senior housing for two redevelopment areas in Brook- lyn Center. Enclosed are two proposals addressing the City's market research needs (one proposal for each area) per my conversations with you and Mr. Ron Warren. Each proposal outlines a work program examining the specific issues in each area. We have also considered the two previous studies completed for the city as well as our other senior housing work in the northwest area in the past year when formula- tion the work programs. The first proposal is for a market analysis of senior housing planned for the Willow Lane redevelopment area. This study will quantify demand for senior housing in Brooklyn Center through 2000, and as such can also be used when considering the potential for senior housing in the 69th and Brooklyn Boulevard redevelopment area. The study will specifically address the demand for senior households with moderate incomes (no more than 115 percent of the median income in the metropolitan area) and will include an analysis of the site of the proposed project. The conclusions section of this report will compare the two areas being considered for senior housing, noting the strengths and weaknesses of each. The cost for this study will be $6,500.00 including our direct costs for photocopying, data purchases, etc. We request a retain- er in the amount of $3,000 along with the signed copy of the contract prior to begin- ning our work. The second proposal is for an assessment of the market for retail development in the 69th and Brooklyn Boulevard redevelopment area, focusing on whether a center of 110,000 to 120,000 square feet is supportable at the subject site. This study will not address specific store types appropriate for the center other than to identify possible anchors and the general positioning of the center in the market area. An analysis of the site will be included in the study. The cost for this study will be $5,000 including our direct costs for photocopying, data purchases, postage, etc. We request a retainer of $2,500 along with a signed copy of the contract prior to beginning work. 612 - 338 -0012 620 KICKERNICK 430 FIRST AVENUE NORTH 612 - 338 -0659 FAX MINNtAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 Mr. Tom Bublitz March 10, 1994 City of Brooklyn Center Page 2 Based on our conversation last week, I understand that the senior study is a higher priority for the city. We will complete the Willow Lane senior study within 60 days of receipt of the signed contract and retainer and we will complete the 69th and Brooklyn Boulevard study within 90 days of receipt of the singed contract and retain- er. We can rearrange these priorities if there is a change in the timing for moving ahead with either redevelopment. If these proposals meet with your approval, please date and sign one copy of each and return it top our office with the retainer and we will schedule this work immedi- ately. Please note that I have addressed the retial study proposal to Mr. Warren. If you have any questions about our proposed work program or if I can be of any other assistance, please call. We look forward to working with you once again. Sincerely, MAXFIELD RESEARCH GROUP, INC. � r 'Thomas R. Melchior Director of Research TRM:trm enclosures NVXFIELD RE SEARCH GROA 1NN March 10, 1994 Mr. Tom Bublitz Community Development Specialist City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Maxfield Research Group, Inc. proposes to provide market research and consulting services to the City of Brooklyn Center to determine the demand for senior housing in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota and examine the potential for 100 to 120 units of moderate rent senior housing in the Willow Lane Redevelopment area. The study includes an examination of growth trends and demographic. characteristics of the senior (65 and over) population and household base (including income and housing value data), review of existing and proposed housing options and services available to seniors in Brooklyn Center and surrounding communities and interviews with social service workers and housing professionals familiar with seniors' housing needs. SCOPE AND COST OF SERVICES A. Site Analysis 1. Tour area, examine access, visibility and surrounding land use. 2. " Examine proximity to retail, health care and other community services. Cost: $ 300.00 B. Demographic Analysis A thorough analysis of overall growth trends and the size and characteristics of the senior population and household base including: 612- 338 -0012 620 KICKERNICK 430 FIRST AVENUE NORTH 612 - 338 -0659 FAX MINNhAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 Mr. Tom Bublitz March 10, 1994 City of Brooklyn Center Page 2 1. Overall population and household growth trends 2. Senior household type 3. Senior household tenure, by age 4. Senior household income 5. Age distribution of the older adult population 6. Housing market conditions, including housing values Cost: $ 1,600.00 C. Senior Housing and Services Market Review An inventory of senior housing and services in Brooklyn Center and surround- ing communities as well as proposed housing projects and their impact on the market. Data will be included on: 1. Number of units (both subsidized and market rate), unit mix, sizes, rents 2. Building features, services and amenities r 3. Resident profile (age, household type, previous residence) 0 4. Community services available 5. Proposed projects, timing and impact on the market 6. Vacancy rates 7. Description of market area Cost: $1,800.00 D. Community Interviews In -depth interviews, both in person and by telephone, will be conducted with study area social service workers, pastors, City staff, real estate agents and others familiar with seniors' housing and service needs to elicit their percep- tion of the need for senior housing and the type of housing most appropriate. It is anticipated that six to eight such interviews will be conducted with the resulting input incorporated into our findings. Cost: $ 500.00 E. Meetings /Client Contact Two meetings are anticipated with City staff and other interested parties: A project orientation meeting to identify specific issues to be examined or; a Mr. Tom Bublitz March 10, 1994 City of Brooklyn Center Page 3 progress review meeting when the research is about three - quarters completed (whichever you prefer); and one final presentation meeting. Cost: $ 400.00 F. Conclusions and Recommendations /Report Preparation Projection of senior housing demand from Brooklyn Center seniors through 2000 and recommendations for potential project(s) with suggested: 1. Unit mix/sizes /rents 2. Unit features 3. Building amenities 4. Services (both inclusive and optional) Cost: $1,400.00 Total Cost for Staff Time for Senior Housing Market Analysis: $6,000.00 Total Cost for Expenses: 500.00 Total Cost of Study: $620.00 COST OF SERVICES The work outlined in the Scope of Services will be performed for Six Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($6,500.00), including the direct costs incurred for travel, telephone, graphic preparation, and printing. Any meeting time requested by the Client beyond that set forth in the accompatingnying task outline will be billed at our normal hour- ly rates for staff time. This cost includes one copy of the draft report, five bound and one unbound copy of the final report. A retainer in the amount of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00) will be required along with an executed copy of this agreement and before commencement . of work by Maxfield Research Group, Inc. The remaining portion shall be payable monthly as costs in excess of the retainer are incurred and billed. WORK PRODUCT Findings will be presented in bound Market Feasibility Study format and will cover the basic market criteria from which a decision can be made to proceed with Mr. Tom Bublitz March 10, 1994 City of Brooklyn Center Page 4 development of senior housing. The Market Feasibility Study is accepted by many lenders, limited partners, investors or governmental bodies who require such docu- mentation to satisfy their financing criteria. COMPLETION TIME The work outlined under the Scope of Services for each phase will be completed within sixty (60) days of the execution of this agreement unless delayed by unexpect- ed emergencies, forces beyond the control of the parties, or by written agreement of the parties. PAYMENT All costs including staff time and out -of- pocket expenses shall be billed on a monthly basis and paid to Maxfield Research Group, Inc. within fifteen (15) days of receipt of an invoice showing the work completed and the cost of the work. A finance charge of one and one -half percent (1.5 %) per month will be added to the unpaid balance of each invoice not paid within fifteen (15) days. DISCLAIMER The objective of this research assignment is to gather and analyze as many market components as is reasonable within the time limits and projected staff hours set forth in this agreement. We assume no responsibility for matters legal in character. The property /land is assumed to be free and clear of any indebtedness, liens or encumbrances; and good and marketable title and competent management are assumed, unless other wise stat- ed. If building plans or site plans are included in the report, they are to be considered only approximate and are submitted to assist the reader in visualizing the property. We assume no responsibility for the accuracy of any building or site plans. Certain information and statistics contained in the report, which are the basis for conclusions contained in the report, will be furnished by other independent sources. While we believe this information is reliable, it has not been independently verified by us and we assume no responsibility for its accuracy. The conclusions in the report are based on our best judgments as market research consultants. Maxfield Research Group, Inc. disclaims any express or implied warran- Mr. Tom Bublitz March 10, 1994 City of Brooklyn Center Page 5 ty of assurance or representation that the projections or conclusions will be realized as stated. The result of the proposed project may be achieved, but also may vary due to changing market conditions characteristic of the real estate industry, changes in facts that were the basis of conclusions in this report, or other unforeseen circum- stances. In the event payment is not received on a timely basis, Maxfield Research Group, Inc. shall be entitled to a lien against the subject property. This agreement will be construed according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. TERMINATION This agreement may be terminated upon written notification of either party to the other. In the event of termination, the Client will pay Maxfield Research Group, Inc. for staff hours performed at the firm's normal hourly rates, plus all expenses incurred through the date of termination. If this proposal meets with your approval, please sign and return one copy to the offices of Maxfield Research Group, Inc. Agreed to this day of 1994. MAXFIELD RESEARCH GROUP, INC. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Economic Development Authority By: Todd Paulson Lee A. Maxfield President LAM /dfd By: Gerald G. Splinter Its: Executive Director L: Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL FROM MAXFIELD RESEARCH GROUP, INC. FOR A MARKET STUDY FOR MODERATE RENT SENIOR HOUSING IN THE WILLOW LANE AREA OF BROOKLYN CENTER AND AUTHORIZING THE PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WHEREAS, at the February 22, 1994 special City Council meeting, the Brooklyn Center City Council authorized staff to submit a proposal for a market study for senior housing in the Willow Lane area of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center EDA has received a proposal from Maxfield Research Group, Inc. in the amount of $6,500 to conduct a market study for moderate rent senior housing in the Willow Lane area of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center EDA believes it is in the best interest of the City of Brooklyn Center and the EDA to accept the proposal from Maxfield Research Group, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center that: 1. The President and Executive Director of the Brooklyn Center EDA are hereby authorized to execute a contract with Maxfield Research Group, Inc. for professional services in the amount of '$6,500. 2. All costs associated with the professional services contract for the market study for senior housing shall be accounted for in the EDA special operating fund. Date Todd Paulson, President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 3128194 Agenda Item Number —5/C REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: ACCEPTING PROPOSAL FROM MAXFIELD RESEARCH GROUP, INC. FOR A MARKET STUDY FOR A RETAIL CENTER IN THE 69TH AVENUE /BROOKLYN BOULEVARD AREA OF BROOKLYN CENTER AND AUTHORIZING THE PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEPT. APPROVAL: Tom blitz, Community Development Specialist MANAGERS REVIEW/RECONMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SL VDAARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached X ) At the February 22, 1994 special City Council meeting, the City Council authorized staff to obtain a proposal from Maxfield Research Group, Inc. for a market study of the retail area at 69th and Brooklyn Boulevard. The proposal submitted by Maxfield Research Group and included with this memorandum is for an assessment of the market for retail development in the 69th and Brooklyn Boulevard redevelopment area, focusing on whether a center of 110,000- 120,000 square feet is supportable at the site. The study will not address specific store types appropriate for the center other than to identify possible anchors and the general positioning of the center in the market area. An analysis of the site will be included in the study. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution Accepting Proposal from Maxfield Research Group, Inc. for a Market Study for a Retail Center in the 69th Avenue /Brooklyn Boulevard Area of Brooklyn Center and Authorizing the President and Executive Director to Enter Into a Contract for Professional Services. NVXFIELD RE SFARCH GRO . March 10, 1994 Mr. Ron Warren Planning and Zoning Specialist City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Maxfield Research Group, Inc. proposes to provide an assessment of the potential for a retail center of about 110,000 to 120,000 square feet in the 69th Avenue /Brooklyn Boule- vard redevelopment area. The study will include an analysis of the site and its appropriate- ness for a retail center, definition of a primary trade area for a neighborhood center at the subject site, examination of household growth trends, age distribution and household in- come for the trade area, data on competing retail areas and potential future retail develop- ment in the trade area including positioning of other nearby retail concentrations in and near the trade area. Recommendations will focus on the amount of retail space support- able at the subject site and the overall positioning of the center. SCOPE AND COST OF SERVICES A. Site Analysis 1. Visit site; tour neighborhood and examine surrounding land use. 2. Evaluate visibility and proposed access. Cost: $ 300.00 B. Demographic Review 1. Define trade area for the proposed retail center. 2. Examine household growth trends. 3. Examine age distribution data. 4. Analyze household growth trends. Cost: $1,000.00 612- 338 -0012 620 KICKERNICK 430 FIRST AVENUE NORTH 612- 338 -0659 FAX MINNhAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 Mr. Ron Warren March 10, 1994 City of Brooklyn Center Page 2 C. Retail Market Review 1. Review previous retail studies conducted in the area, notably the Maxfield Re- search Group, Inc. study of commercial /industrial trends completed in June 1991. 2. Inventory existing retail concentrations, assess the positioning of each. 3. Collect data on retail centers in and near the trade area including data on lease rates, vacancies, tenant profile. Assess market positioning of each. 4. Estimate total retail square footage in the trade area. and sales per square foot data, 5. Catalog planned retail development, proposed changes to existing centers. where available. Cost: $1,800.00 D. Meetings /Client Contact 1. One (1) orientation meeting to review goals of the study and the work program. 2. One (1) draft review meeting or final presentation meeting, whichever you prefer. Cost: $ 350.00 E. Conclusions and Recommendations 1. Determine the amount of retail footage supportable at the subject site (up to 120,000 square feet). 2. Suggest appropriate market positioning of the center, possible tenant mix. 3. Comment on n a y site issues or other market factors that may impact the success the proposed retail center. 4. Report writing, editing, assembly. Cost: $1,250.00 Total Cost for Staff Time for Study: $4,700.00 Total Cost for Expenses: 300.00 Total Cost of Study: $5,000.00 COST OF SERVICES The work outlined in the Scope of Services will be performed for Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), including the direct costs incurred for travel, telephone, graphic preparation, and printing. An meeting time requested b the Client beyond that set forth in the accom- b Y g q Y Y panying task outline will be billed at our normal hourly rates for staff time. This cost in- Mr. Ron Warren March 10, 1994 City of Brooklyn Center Page 3 cludes one (1) copy of the draft report and six (6) copies of the final report, five bound and one unbound. Additional copies will be provided at our direct cost. A retainer in the amount of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) will be re- quired along with an executed copy of this agreement and before commencement of work by Maxfield Research Group, Inc. The remaining portion shall be payable monthly as costs in excess of the retainer are incurred and billed. WORK PRODUCT Findings will be presented in a bound Market Feasibility Study format and will cover the basic market criteria from which a decision can be made to proceed with the project. The Market Feasibility Study is accepted by many lenders, limited partners, investors or governmental bodies who require such documentation to satisfy their financing criteria. COMPLETION TIME The work outlined'under the Scope of Services will be completed within ninety (90) days of the execution of this agreement, unless delayed by unexpected emergencies, forces beyond the control of the parties, or by written agreement of the parties. PAYMENT All costs including staff time and out -of- pocket expenses shall be billed on a monthly basis and paid to Maxfield Research Group, Inc. within fifteen (15) days of receipt of an invoice showing the work completed and the cost of the work. A finance charge of one and one - half percent (1.5 %) per month will be added to the unpaid balance of each invoice not paid within fifteen (15) days. DISCLAIMER The objective of this research assignment is to gather and analyze as many market compo- nents as is reasonable within the time limits and projected staff hours set forth in this agreement. We assume no responsibility for matters legal in character. The property /land is assumed to be free and clear of any indebtedness, liens or encumbrances; and good and marketable title and competent management are assumed, unless otherwise stated. If building plans or i 1 g p site plans are included in the report, they are to be considered only Mr. Ron Warren March 10, 1994 City of Brooklyn Center Page 4 approximate and are submitted to assist the reader in visualizing the property. We assume no responsibility for the accuracy of any building or site plans. Certain information and statistics contained in the report, which are the basis for conclu- sions contained in the report, will be furnished by other independent sources. While we believe this information is reliable, it has not been independently verified by us and we assume no responsibility for its accuracy. The conclusions in the report are based on our best judgments as market research consul- tants. Maxfield Research Group, Inc. disclaims any express or implied warranty of assur- ance or representation that the projections or conclusions will be realized as stated. The result of the proposed project may be achieved, but also may vary due to changing market conditions characteristic of the real estate industry, changes in facts that were the basis of conclusions in this report, or other unforeseen circumstances. In the event payment is not received on a timely basis, Maxfield Research Group, Inc. shall be entitled to a lien against the subject property. This agreement will be construed according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. TERMINATION This agreement may be terminated upon written notification of either party to the other. In the event of termination, the Client will pay Maxfield Research Group, Inc. for staff hours performed at the firm's normal hourly rates, plus all expenses incurred through the date of termination. If this proposal meets with your approval, please sign and return one copy to the offices of Maxfield Research Group, Inc. Agreed to this — day of 199_. MAXFIELD RESEARCH GROUP, INC. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ��-- -� Lee A. Maxfield Ron W4'f-C7n By: Todd Paulson Its: President LAM /trm By: Gerald G. Splinter Its: Executive Director 5 )1= Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL FROM MAXFIELD RESEARCH GROUP, INC. FOR A MARKET STUDY FOR A RETAIL CENTER IN THE 69TH AVENUE /BROOKLYN BOULEVARD AREA OF BROOKLYN CENTER AND AUTHORIZING THE PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WHEREAS, at the February 22, 1994 special City Council meeting, the Brooklyn Center City Council authorized staff to submit a proposal for a market study for a retail center in the 69th Avenue /Brooklyn Boulevard area of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center EDA has received a proposal from Maxfield Research Group, Inc. in the amount of $5,000 to conduct a market study for a retail center in the 69th Avenue /Brooklyn Boulevard area of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center EDA believes it is in the best interest of the City of Brooklyn Center and the EDA to accept the proposal from Maxfield Research Group, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center that: 1. The President and Executive Director of the Brooklyn Center EDA are hereby authorized to execute a contract with Maxfield Research Group, Inc. for professional services in the amount of $5,000. 2. All costs associated with the professional services contract for the market study for a retail center shall be accounted for in the EDA special operating fund. Date Todd Paulson President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly P g g Y seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 3/28/% Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER AND ESTABLISHING OFFER OF JUST COMPENSATION FOR SAID PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6933 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD IN BROOKLYN CENTER DEPT. APPROVAL: = Z� 7 Tom blitz, Community Developm t Specialist MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECOAMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUM MLARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached X ) This item was first reviewed with the EDA as a discussion item at the February 28, 1994 EDA meeting. As you may recall, the owner of the property had approached City staff with regard to any interest the City might have in purchasing the property. In reviewing the value of the property, Assessing Department records showed a value of $63,400 for the total market and land value for 1994. The property has experienced a fire which has substantially damaged the interior of the building and the assessor's market value of $63,400 was established prior to the fire taking place. Because the fire has substantially damaged the property, staff is recommending that the City consider purchasing the property as a voluntary acquisition for the land value only. The City Assessor's valuation of the land is between $17,500 and $20,000. This is the value of the lot with the existing house and garage cleared from the site. Staff is recommending that the City offer the owner an amount which totals the existing lot value of $17,500, less the estimated demolition cost for the property which is $5,500. The total offer for the lot would be $17,500 less $5,500, or $12,000. At the February 28, 1994 meeting, staff pointed out the need to assess the property with regard to asbestos- containing materials. An asbestos survey of the property was conducted by Environmental Process, Inc. (EPI), and the results of that survey are included with this memorandum. Essentially, • the asbestos survey showed that there is floor tile on the property and pipe wrap insulation which contain asbestos. The estimated cost for the abatement of the asbestos in this property is approximately $1,000. Given the small amount of asbestos in the property, the regulations of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) may allow us to demolish the building without removing the asbestos. Staff is still investigating this possibility and will be prepared to report on this in more detail at the meeting. The resolution before the EDA this evening will be to authorize staff to make a written offer to the owner of the property for $12,000. I have spoken with the owner informally and it appears that this would be an agreeable sum for him to accept for the property. If the owner agrees in writing to this amount, then we would negotiate a purchase agreement and return to the EDA for final • approval of the purchase of this property. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution Authorizing the Acquisition of Certain Real Property Within the City of Brooklyn Center and Establishing Offer of Just Compensation for Said Property Located at 6933 Brooklyn Boulevard in Brooklyn Center. GENERAL ASBESTOS SURVEY FOR THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER AT 6933 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 P0# 86764�< EPI 94 -657' ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS, INC. 1220 GLENWOOD AVENUE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55405 (612) 377 -8316 MARCH 22, 1994 O VIRONMENTAL PROCESS, INCORPORATED 1220 Glenwood Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 • 612 - 377 -8316 • Fax 612 - 377 -4984 ep 16 GENERAL ASBESTOS SURVEY FOR THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER AT 6933 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD EPI 4`94 -657 1.0 INTRODUCTION Environmental Process, Inc. (EPI), was contracted by the Economic Development Authority (EDA) in and for the City of Brooklyn Center under purchase order number 86764 to collect and analyze bulk samples of suspect asbestos containing materials (ACM's). These materials included wall, floor and ceiling coverings, thermal insulations, and miscellaneous debris that were present'in the abandoned residential building and garage located at 6933 Brooklyn Boulevard, in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. 2.0 BACKGROUINTD /OBSERVATIONS The residential structure had experienced a fire and was currently vacant. EDA contracted EPI to perform a limited walk- through asbestos survey which was performed on March 9,1994. After preliminary bulk sample results were verbally reported to Mr. Tom Bublitz on March 15, 1994, EDA requested EPI complete the general asbestos survey of the house and garage structures. The purpose of the general asbestos survey was to determine if the building materials were ACM's. This was in response to Minnesota law which requires an asbestos survey prior to demolition, renovation, and construction activity. Also the survey was required to make a decision regarding EDA acquisition of the property. 3.0 COLLECTION PROCEDURE The scope of survey area and sample materials was directed by a representative of the EDA in and for the City of Brooklyn Center. Bulk samples were collected using appropriate bulk sample techniques in accordance with federal, state, and AHERA asbestos guidelines. GENERAL ASBESTOS SURVEY 6933 BROOKLYN BLVD. EPI 94 -657 PAGE 2 4.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Asbestos International Asbestos Testing Laboratory (IATL) Bulk asbestos analysis is conducted in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Method 600/M -4 -82 -020 December 1982, documented in 40 CFR, Part 763, Ch.1, (7/1/87 Edition), Subpart F, Appendix A. This is the approved method for the analysis of asbestos in building materials according to the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA). All analyses were performed using a stereoscope and Olympus BH -2 polarized light microscope equipped with a 10x dispersion staining objective. 5.0 REMARKS GARAGE No suspect asbestos containing building materials were observed on the interior of the garage structure. HOUSE Forty one of forty eight bulk samples collected were analyzed. The following was determined from the sample analyses: ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS The materials determined to contain asbestos in the analyzed sample portions include: - 4 "x4" green floor tile located in the bathroom - 9 "x9" brown floor tile located in the basement - hard, putty -like pipe wrap insulation in the basement GENERAL ASBESTOS SURVEY 6933 BROOKLYN BLVD. EPI X94 -657 Page 3 NON ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS The followinu materials were determined not to contain asbestos in the analyzed sample portions: - Ceiling texture - Trowelled wall texture - Sprayed -on wall texture - Ceiling sheetrock - White wallboard - White patterned floor linoleum - Tan floor linoleum adhesive - Tan floor the adhesive - Black floor tile mastic - Soft, brown insulation debris - Black tar paper exterior wall moisture barrier - Miscellaneous ground debris outside the building, originating from the fire Refer to the following attachments for additional sample information: - project site location map - building plan with sample locations - analytical bulk sample summary - independent testing laboratory analyses - independent testing laboratory accreditations EPI recommends the asbestos containing floor tile, and pipe wrap insulation be removed prior to demolition. The estimated cost for this abatement is one thousand dollars ($1,000). 6.0 STANDARD OF CARE EPI's survey was limited to accessible building spaces, did not include roofing materials of the house and garage, and was performed in accordance with our understanding of state, federal, and AHERA requirements. Our identification of suspect ACM's was based on our field observation, suspect materials, past experience, material collection, and analysis All samples will be retained for 30 days and then discarded appropriately, unless otherwise notified. GENERAL ASBESTOS SURVEY 6933 BROOKLYN BLVD. EPI T94 -657 Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS, INC. ott S. Norton, IH MICHAEL BERREAU, CC! AHERA Building Inspector BIR -570 Asbestos Designer PD -B2 AHERA Management Planner MPR -501 Vice President 'ON A C 'OA.dV Crl 1"4 T* 'O)1D 'N ,HO 6- 31V0 31 YO AO SN0ISIA3N � ha�+�nS So�SDc�4� �ro.nay.7c, \i}a °N O 1 ^ Q 1519 S Y x > 9> m r Z Z X. m o m N y f n 13 r ` m m 0 �ag�Otl Oj ➢ m I y N Nur.'M ! ii bd�T n c 31 < ■ > U N 3AV H1, n AV «H1 X A f 2 Z l _ $ 'N ]AV t1 59 ""• syn >E _ Vl H NIM .,� p T Y ar Hl n V Ht � M H �ir Hl > N B9 N loo N '3A1 N { . NVBN p > z > OCL "M Kled rn a a n • ym 1StL� < rel. Ar LsrL ,,,�''�Tl• m„ n�..•�.r,,:.0 Y �I i 1 NNY I - - = N" + . 0 ar,� r Nur �.il - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- (da+h ��� �z, ►3 a Q6 NOO IY� Fi 31 -40 i �AvY�A�e, I -- - I ti 1. _1 ^ Roa,�. , 12, 3S 2 20, 21, 23 3, 7,8,2B,1-1 X5,22,3 2y, 32- 31 2.7 NOr 1,30 SCALE -T` REVISIONS 13Y DATE N�re. DATE 3 - Z3 J4N\ („) lRo 0vn t DR'N. CKD. �Q4 r'80 w� S N � / Q AP•vD. TITLE NO. Lejl 2, EPA. 9;�-lDs"7 ANALYTICAL BULK SAMPLE SUMMARY; 6933 BROOKLYN BLVD. BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA EPIn 94 -657 March 22, 1994 MATERIAL # SAMPLES ASBESTOS /RANGE SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ANALYZED POSITIVE NEGATIVE (o) NUMBERS Ceiling texture 7 0 7 None Detected BB -1,15, 16,17,18 ,19,20 Trowelled Wall 3 0 3 None Detected BB -2,21, Texture 22 Sprayed Wall 3 0 3 None Detected BB -11,30 Texture 31 Ceiling Sheetrock 3 0 3 None Detected BB -3,23, 24 Wallboard white 3 0 3 None Detected BB -4,34, 35 Floor linoleum white, square 3 0 3 None Detected BB -5,26, pattern 27 Floor the 4 "x4 ", green 2 1 1 Chrysotile -6 BB -7,28 Floor the 9 "x9 ",brown 1 1 0 Chrysotile -12 BB -9 Analytical Bulk Sample Summary 6933 Brooklyn Blvd. Brooklyn Center, Minnesota EPI 4r -657 Page 2 MATERIAL T SAMPLES # # ASBESTOS /RANGE SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ANALYZED POSITIVE NEGATIVE M NUMBERS Floor linoleum tan adhesive 3 0 3 None Detected BB -25, 26,27 Floor the tan adhesive 2 0 2 None Detected BB -8, 28 Floor the black mastic 1 0 1 None Detected BB -10 Insulation debris,soft, 3 0 3 None Detected BB -13,32 brown 33 Pipe wrap, putty -like 1 1 0 Chrysotile -25 BB -12 Exterior wall moisture barrier black tar paper 3 0 3 None Detected BB -14,36 37 Outside Building Ground debris from fire 3 0 3 None Detected BB -38,39 40 f7`''4 "w' �j " 'L; °n11'u11i,:q'.:)''•�II MIA I ii il.l: It, l.i uo:;Yf v '�. ��"lP3 3 (;1 {t,r11; 1i1n1:Ii r\::1,1,"•It _.v . --��� _.,. --_._. .Fy 'i t IIIf1 Id11 ft N:11111'Il•,( ,;t,l, ur1 l l4i.'7l1'1 !'J>; 60) ill.' F c e 1 1 —.- L t No.: L- !- r ' :~()111;15:1: ....,,, r. LC' �. j..-.. �L�- �- µ- 1•{-- �---"- "-- ..___.._..._ -- ) Lr111O1tr1'1'i >R1' lill�'rn_ajcYa_t � 1 , ._ctc�ti'1' • _: , t� , l�, i _l?'c'_.i�i',',.`:.._ t,uil C:olt(;tci: i ?r;�i1K_t`1,rE•,ii�c:jc;_ii( 1(litly•1'iS: I ^.cSl j ht t11C LS.�,)' +1_ — _ �'Sil'11r�voi)nI in 1i!: i PA 000/1!5111. 0_0)71) F S;lntltic'),i )c.livc('e cl: _.._._�-- --•- -- --- .._�- •1).tte.^ ......._ ._�_...— �i+•1- tt'l.' ~^— ......__ .. `! ,._ ^__ S ilu thlr,ti iZc�t: ivla (:_.._.r— ...— _..— ...__.__.._._ �- {) il;c__._.� , r �� , �.�.1.�..._.— � •1•inu'_ ___....._...._i ti ittltttl� Altsl� _J ._.._`� i tcvi cw : __�. - - -- J � I);,(l"_- - -�'-� i __ _�_l:itl'�cr ._---- - - -• -• •° ' { i'ralitnin;lry ltcs Kt;ieasr.;1; i; tc ' __i i r U I c's o Coii f�Si � `(171•( \ r.Sil. .'1(11'O �r5i11(('ill � � i Q litt )1(t !/ t'hrys _An1 Y cs_ltc -r_ I —� N!� w Nr,n•�)tlattcr( _ {,lvifyl i+ 11y '.i.r1'i' i9K.i /i'1• ?.: \t " iiS Nt i' + 1'+uiil:uil > 1 n- AC' 1, ftt ,iitcr nnn'ysis rttluirctl NA Not Aimly'J.I:d M i+ ANO' y ACM 1 w Ml:uyzct{ l,y ii:•:' +1' 1'l tt.J,li':.�i•Nf)il c 1'A• li 1'i.�9 ici!1,1,'1'1:�4 at1 1y:;ix pe.rfturltll PC 1't?i1?1 Ccx+tllCtl y 'fill' pI 1 ark! 13X111;11 b 1A'1'1, (tl i:a `Ctiiit: (>r7`C4ti51 C;i ;:y i]il(:;titi ililtiCtj lilt !l 11 l: ' 11t1X 41111 t�:{i11 V1 tl ?IS \{1111';, tiil'�'l: ;�tiiilli ili'S: i `lltit'11, !N1% hl'Cil 11l'Clii'oit'iy 5�1i�'�f - I'1{ t7�' I : C:(t "Il. hilt all of the X17 11111., lma i •i r , ' '1 Oi l: '.,;i1at"'111> ' liir�,tii� ?(', i'I!Pl1 ta.'i11i1C;til'• i/j /�lllli�'• ":i..'i 1�' }1l (ttli \'J ii1�S6 'h1'sc rvsu,ls I1r not have, ltcclt n:vit T(I t y r .} prclimit7ory rrt +1115. 'file signed COA is to lie 01C, o1l ;cial r.:suitx. Ail "I AP 111tH NYC-H1'1) t'(`:uiiliula NTly. C- 'd �iUI CE:FJT b6. VT Zd li tt�'t'tlal is r {1:11 Atil)�'Slt ).ti 1L ,n1u Ilurintn Wily llnit 100 Nit, I.Iilyd. NJ 0405, law& rcic {,hunc:40').2 }{ )H9 VW 6 09.23I.f)a N '1'�•atilt}; L:iln�l';ttt{ri�'ti I Prcl'i�illary RC s , CLIENT: Project: I Btlli_j�dfi rill Ann l9 CH etlt Cont-let: AriAtyS3S: ��' � t�?l Dt► Client'' IA1 I�' 1�' ASbaslo+totUc nt ' j�p11 A Sb, I`fll['!)tl4 ":, • uniGnt N1 +1' Nh Chr s' :° ..Aliils....•..Other T +.t;ln:4!, .i `'Cili, btCler cC 13 Z`77z 1 y '_ '7253 �1 n r'� • r See Ps,c t rur Ablif inliun Kcy Phase PrOblillinry vesul nru issued Sly IATI. Ili exl)editc prueedures by Cliaills b0sed 11110(1 the tll)nVtS d111A, IATi, ussuulcs slult all o II1e 31111111111 tltilnuux nnu .r+„•, •,{ •.t ,f,...... %ry linxcd. has tnco umirnluly vilplrlied by ilia client. Tlicsa results snag not bu" 11"11 reviewed by ilia Lnborulory Director. Phial Certifiento of Annlydis will In110w III` prclin)inary resulla. The signed CQA is 111 ba cnn31dcrad the oftielt{l results, All FLAP, NYC•111 131 and MIST b �• ; , , ,,1Y 71yI t7C:CI 1;-6. VT H�1 + i ut, •,•, t:,l is ,n:ll 1 \r;l,t':;ic iti {Gnfril I(orirn„ R',p (h,ic tP� t•ti. Lourrl, ;1J QP.OS4 '1 l' > t.;ll,e >1':VSt,I'It'ti 'Cel�}uiune; ruy,e�,.7 w,, roy c,,,�o,o ��t'�'.j1111{i11T "� • I�CSt1�fS aim ruc�rTr� ^1. CQ�r.3� r�nc�K�u GAUD P rojoct No.: �H � Vrojcc:l Louti(m: Co ntact: ..Carr �GETO� Tulel,hooc; FAX: LAltt)KA't't)1L1': intt,ntiil }ian chest ,c 74- -eti viv Lub )f iik�Ly Litlt Ct)tttstc {: T rank �rrnft5l l (6()9) 1.11 - 4 1`ltlt�ytiiti: 1'tt �R}jj� ; t!t! Lh Miu tir�P_Y._�_�� }>`'} 'I'tu'ctAt'ot)nrT'I'itttc�: _`� t•7eit la' �ov� �t -RO -n o � �, >i„t 5)nn I)tt's hufivurct}; T J :+t a. � } 'ime: Snr 12r•c,!iVCCI: ) YD111c }'i Cnn I nl lik An ti1R: T j l)nRd: lg i 11t1LY. itrcfintinnr 1 ;csully itc(estsed; Dato: 3 ZT 1'iTrtc: lull tal Log J SnlilTi r i)t t;llettl Tn'1'i. (/ 'SG .A +ha r tr,:`LOntpi)t Nrn,- ,��Tv. T'ihran+ Carticnl Ccltti Tlt Cl ' iry Al s unn OtJ,ci_ i',(ii;isg Ccll C�Rlti+l NT t I� *A t Co I cc) -- Z�3 25 n1 i 20 Z�3ZS� �3 5ci nv� N[) • - Annlyaed 9y EIAP 1r98.1J1'Lht -Noll NJr}r = Nnn hibroua i'niticululrt > I `X, ACM, nn rmilicr onnlyxix rec}uircd A N J`int Annly�ed N w tt * +■ ACM 1r Ah„lycad by t?LAP 19R.4NW-NOIt PC >< Point Connild C I %, i,y T'LM 193.1 TEM mmlysis per(oru,cd t'1,�.� prat •��i + y res:nits me isnuccl by JA'1'l, to uxltcOitc Irrnc•.uclurcx by clients hnscd ultnn the nh ttve c!i)in, lA'I'L nsxumus ihnl fill of lht: :cl,ml+l'u ),u•IiIIIIIA :Intl ti:IR1t 11pn)1 W166 thew resultS iiru IM.W.0, 1119 W:urt uuon r„lc y ,,,t•1•ti�.i h7 tho .•I ..,,t. Thcsc roults may not llavtt Iluvil ruvicwcd b the Uslim ory Director. 1"il1111 Cultiricnic. of Annly9i9 Will tollnW thew l NYC 1 c:onditivny 1l)ltly. IrrCilllilll�Cy rCtil111S, 11tC 9lblietl COl� }a ht ho cnn: 11,c otliri: rrcnitx. All T':I.Ai timid •I f'h Z - I1HI 62 : 60 b6 T7— �iHtl A , , ,XV I l tl i mit It wo l A. -J iL'sk ) ,ti I bugU 11 +n W�) Urilt tt. lurc, NJ 06051 li'tililtt{ l.ali(ltaitri'll? 1'clti,fi +,nc;(�915t.'Jii7 t'1 t 1 Resul ( CLIENT: I'rojart: I Amilysis: Bulk Material Angllx. sIm __ Client Contact: Sant r, 11� ! Sunintltry l7:ttit Clleut YA'11 r� A�l)CStO'tA11t(Ilt Null ASIA X 1ItlC{ltty '' t1 i (,} .11 �Utt {lilt Nl 1 � lVJk Ctir" Anlcis " i;;'Othrr 7 2Jr -1 (1Y� 1 Z- — 1S MaSTto. h,l� loG 3a Z Z (,( - nY-D - 3t ( 0 10 , 27�`k n Zf3'U n Page - > scu Page t (nr Alri rcvintiun Kcy Thubw l„'t`liFnluolrr resulte+ nro lmm* 1 6y WrL to expodif hrn,'erlurex 11y c111¢nt11 1111904 11POn IhC abOYO 1111111. 1ATI, ussumu9 iliat nit or the sampling motliods and dntu upon wliich thexu rexulls are based, has been aecurttiely nut11111Cd by the client. Tlicso results niny not 1111VC oven reviewcu by 1110 1- 11bulutuly Dllv61vl. 1-1mil or Annlyuir wall rollow dw-10 lircliminary resulls. The eignccl COA is to tic cnnsiclered tho official results, All FLAP, NYCAWD, UVA, turd NiS'l' I` Cc7— 'lions apply. 7iuI r2:60 V5, tiZI L4uw i A MMICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION 11 1,(TtiO .gS6estos estilig ATn pre S( de, Mj has (nl(illec 'trria for Indust Laborniarp /lccreilitatic�t� since Oar , 1991. 'his accru rtati��n sh:�ll he e((ective until the 1st clay of March, 1994 ;uhject to crnllillued comhliatuc with All IA ic(:rcdil;)lion criteria. { Chal man vdenr Lahorlruy Accreriilation AmerlCan industrial I tyatene Commillce Association March 15, 1991 Arcm(lltation Numhcr - -- - -- Data t a . ' `'"'� �`,r ''`�' -' Itll�;; l:i[ic Dn:;l :�.�`�•tilc7i CERTIFICATIONS American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) AIHA # Laboratory Accreditation Certification 444 National Institute of Occupational Safety And Health PAT # Proficiency Analytical Testing Program 08052 -001 (NIOSH /PAT) National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation NVLAP # Program For Bulk Asbestos Analysis 1165 By Polarized Light Microscopy National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation NVLAP # Program For Airborne Asbestos Analysis 1165 By Transmission Electron Microscopy New Jersey Department Of Environmental 03863 Protection And Energy Certification Of Analysis In Drinking Water By The AA Chelation Extration Method New York State Department Of Health FLAP # Environmental Laboratory Approval Program 11021 The Commonwealth Of Massachusetts A A Department of Labor and Industries 000092 Asbestos Abatement Program Rhode Island Department Of Health AAL Division'Of Occupational And Radiological Health 0068C3 Certification To Provide Asbestos Analytical Services The Commonwealth Of Virginia 000045 Department of Commerce The State Of Connecticut PH -0760 Department Of Health Laboratory Division Vermont Department Of Health 13227 Asbestos Control Program Division Of Environmental Health State Of Utah E -186 Department Of Health Environmental Asbestos Testing Program City Of New York - Department Of Environmental Protection Bureau Of Air Resources Approved Emergency Laboratory Contractor. American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Lab # Asbestos Analysts Registry Program 08052 -001 Counter ID #'s: 3261 4879 4880 4881 4882 4883 Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER AND ESTABLISHING OFFER OF JUST COMPENSATION FOR SAID PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6933 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD IN BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center (EDA) has received an appraisal of the lot valuation of the property at 6933 Brooklyn Boulevard from the City's Assessing Department; and WHEREAS, the EDA is authorized, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.012, Subd. 7, within its area of operation, and without the adoption of an urban renewal plan, to acquire real property and to demolish or remove the buildings and improvements thereon; and WHEREAS, the owner of the property located at 6933 Brooklyn Boulevard in the City of Brooklyn Center, legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Sunset Manor (the property) , has requested that the EDA consider the purchase of the property; and WHEREAS, the building located on the property has been damaged substantially by fire and is substandard and obsolescent and that such condition is detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare of the community; and WHEREAS, the EDA has received the appraisal of the lot value of the property which establishes the market value for the lot at $17,500. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center as follows: 1. The EDA hereby finds and determines that the property is substandard and obsolete within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes Section 469.012. 2. The lot appraisal documentation described in paragraph 1 of this resolution is hereby accepted as establishing the fair market value of the lot at 6933 Brooklyn Boulevard contingent on demolition and removal of the existing structures on the property. 4. The Executive Director is authorized to make a written offer of $12,000 to the owner of the real property at 6933 Brooklyn Boulevard. Said offer is I EDA Resolution No. the result of deducting the estimated cost of demolition ($5,500) from the established fair market value of the lot ($17,500). 5. The Executive Director is hereby authorized to take such further action as may be necessary to acquire the property under the terms and conditions of this resolution. Date Todd Paulson, President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.