HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988 06-27 CCM Regular Session MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
JUNE 27,. 1988
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order
by Mayor Dean Nyquist at 7:04 p.m._
ROLL CALL
Mayor Dean Nyquist, Councilmembers Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and
Rich Theis. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public
Works Sy Knapp, Finance Director Paul Holmlund, Director of Planning and
Inspection Ron Warren, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, Personnel Coordinator
Geralyn Barone, and Administrative Aid Patti Page.
INVOCATION
Mayor Nyquist noted members of the Brooklyn Center Prayer Breakfast Committee
had volunteered to give the invocation at the Council meetings this year.
The invocation was offered by Dr. Dennis Morrow.
OPEN FORUM
Mayor Nyquist recognized Mike Kaulfuss of the Brooklyn Center Police Department.
Mr. Kaulfuss stated he would like to thank the Mayor for writing the editorial
for the Brooklyn Center Post in response to a past editorial. He stated the
police union contract is nearing arbitration, and he would like to leave some
information for the Councilmembers this evening.
Mayor Nyquist then recognized Dave Adams, 2901 Nash Road. He inquired if
Minnegasco would be repairing the road which was dug up during the winter. The
Director of Public Works stated Minnegasco did a number of street cuts during
the winter and will soon be awarding the contract for removal of the temporary
patches and repairing of the street. Mr. Adams inquired if the City Council was
\ aware of the fact that the Public Works Department has not signed a contract for
1988 yet. The City Manager stated the Council is aware of this, and the
contract is in mediation at this time. Mr. Adams stated he felt this contract
should be settled soon since it is the middle of 1988 already.
CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Nyquist inquired if any Councilmembers requested any items removed from
the consent agenda. Councilmember Hawes requested items 7c and 7d be removed,
and Councilmember Lhotka requested item 7g be removed from the consent agenda.
RESOLUTIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -104
Member Bill Hawes introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
6 -27 -88 -1-
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1988 -09
(RECONDITIONING WELL NO. 8)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Rich Theis, and the motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -105
Member Bill Hawes introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE REMOVAL OF SHADE TREES
(ORDER NO. DST 06/27/88)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Rich Theis, and the motion passed unanimously.
LICENSES
There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
approve the following list of licenses:
AMUSEMENT DEVICES - OPERATOR
Brookdale East Cinema 5801 John Martin Dr.
Brooklyn Center Community Center 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy.
Chuck Wagon Inn 5720 Morgan Ave. N.
Davanni's 5937 Summit Drive
Days Inn 1501 Freeway Boulevard
Earle Brown Bowl 6445 James Circle
Green Mill Inn, Inc. 5540 Brooklyn Blvd.
Ground Round, Inc. 2545 County Road 10
Holiday Inn 2200 Freeway Boulevard
Lynbrook Bowl 6357 North Lilac Drive
Metropolitan Transit Commission 6845 Shingle Creek Pkwy.
Snyder Brothers Drug 1296 Brookdale Center
T. Wright's 5800 Shingle Creek Pkwy.
U.A. Movies at Brookdale 5810 Shingle Creek Pkwy.
AMUSEMENT DEVICES - VENDOR
American Amusement Arcades 850 Decatur Avenue
Theisen Vending Co. 3804 Nicollet Ave. N.
FOOD ESTABLISHMENT
Denny's Restaurant 3901 Lakebreeze Ave. N.
ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT
Brooklyn Center Parks & Rec Dept. Central Park
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
Cronstrom's Heating & A/C 4410 Excelsior Blvd.
Green Mechanical, Inc. 8811 E. Research Ctr. Rd.
Fred Vogt & Co. 3260 Gorham Avenue
RENTAL DWELLINGS
Initial:
6 -27 -88 -2-
Fatih Bey 3617 Admiral Lane
Keith L. Nordby 5960 Brooklyn Blvd.
Brian & Dorothy Follese 6933 Brooklyn Blvd.
John C. Meyers 1133 63rd Lane North
Renewal:
Dave or Mary Huang 6400 Girard Ave. N.
Martha Lahti 5316 Knox Ave. N.
Martha Lahti 5322 Knox Ave. N.
J. G. Strand 5329 Penn Ave. N.
ROI Properties, Inc. 7109 -7113 Unity Ave. N.
Richard & Sharon Krawiecki 5209 Xerxes Ave. N.
Frances M. Lunacek 5211 Xerxes Ave. N.
Tracy Rice 5836 Xerxes Ave, N.
TAXICAB
Suburban Taxi Corporation 9614 Humboldt Ave. S.
The motion passed unanimously.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 13 1988 - REGULAR SESSION
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott
to approve the minutes of the June 13, 1988, City Council meeting. The motion
passed unanimously. Mayor Nyquist abstained from the vote.
_RESOLUTIONS (CONTINUED)
The City Manager presented a Resolution Appropriating Funds and Approving
Payment for Emergency Repairs of Air Conditioning System for Civic Center.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -106
Member Rich Theis introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS AND APPROVING PAYMENT FOR EMERGENCY REPAIRS OF
AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM FOR CIVIC CENTER
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Gene Lhotka, and the motion passed unanimously.
The City Manager presented a Resolution Accepting Work Performed under
Improvement Project No. 1987 -24 (Reconditioning Well No. 6). Councilmember
Hawes stated he believed there were two dollar amounts in the resolution which
needed to be changed. He noted on the first page item No. 3, the total amount
for the contract should be $13,431. He stated on the second page of the
resolution item No. 8, the total amount of the contract should be $5,487. The
Director of Public Works agreed with these changes.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -107
Member Bill Hawes introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1987 -24
(RECONDITIONING WELL N0, 6)
6 -27 -88 -3-
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously.
The City Manager presented a Resolution Accepting Work Performed under
Improvement Project No. 1988 -08 (Installation of Pressure Tanks at Wells No. 2,
4, 5, 7, and 8).
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -108
Member Bill Hawes introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1988 -08
(INSTALLATION OF PRESSURE TANKS AT WELLS NO. 2, 4, 5, 7, AND 8)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Gene Lhotka, and the motion passed unanimously.
The City Manager presented a Resolution Accepting Proposal for Noise Reduction
on the H.V.A.C. System in City Council Chambers, Improvement Project No. 1988-
12. Councilmember Lhotka stated he did not understand how staff came up with a
90% reduction in the noise level. The Director of Public Works went on to
explain how noise levels are measured in decibels and how the 90% reduction was
reached.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -109
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL FOR NOISE REDUCTION ON THE H.V.A.C. SYSTEM IN CITY
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1988 -12
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously.
The City Manager noted the next two resolutions raise some questions which he
feels the City Council should address. He noted the two resolutions are
acknowledging gifts, one from the Brooklyn Center Lions Club and one from the
Brooklyn Center American Legion Post. He stated the City is the regulatory body
for these two organizations and inquired if the Council feels accepting these
gifts compromises the City's position if a disciplinary action is required. The
City Manager added the City did not ask these organizations for the gifts; the
organizations heard of the City's need and sent the money.
Councilmember Theis inquired of the Finance Director what the City's annual
budget was. The Director of Finance stated it was approximately $10 million.
Councilmember Theis stated he does not feel these small dollar gifts would
affect the way he would make decisions regarding disciplinary actions for these
or other organizations. Mayor Nyquist inquired where Councilmember Theis would
draw the line. Councilmember Theis stated that is a difficult question to
answer because when looking at dollar amounts there is a definite gray area, but
he is sure at some point there would be a definite black area for drawing the
line.
6 -27 -88 -4-
Councilmember Lhotka stated he does not have a problem accepting these gifts
from the organizations, but if it does become a problem for staff or the
auditors there are plenty of organizations such as CEAP, and the Mediation
Project which could be suggested to these organizations. Councilmember Scott
stated she does not see a problem with accepting these gifts unless the City is
soliciting the funds from the organizations. Councilmember Hawes stated he
would prefer to see the donations go to other more needy organizations.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -110
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING GIFT FROM THE BROOKLYN CENTER LIONS CLUB
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -111
Member Rich Theis introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING GIFT FROM BROOKLYN CENTER AMERICAN LEGION POST NO. 630
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously.
Councilmember Lhotka stated he would like to see this issue come back before the
Council as a discussion item at a later date.
ORDINANCES
The City Manager presented An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 Regarding the
Parking Requirements for Places of Public Assembly. He noted this item was
reviewed by the Planning Commission and is recommended for a first reading this
evening. Councilmember Scott inquired if the Director of Planning and
Inspection was comfortable with the proposed parking formula. The Director of
Planning and Inspection responded affirmatively and noted this proposed change
would only affect the parking requirement for places-of assembly within a
retail shopping center complex, but it would not affect freestanding theatres or
churches. The City Manager noted the City has had flyovers at the different
shopping centers during the busy Christmas season, and it appears this will not
be a problem at Brookdale Square. Councilmember Lhotka stated he did not
understand why this amendment is being looked at individually instead of with a
Planning Commission item or under the review of other areas of Chapter 35.
Councilmember Theis inquired if this amendment would affect the amount of
building density on a site. The Director of Planning and Inspection responded
affirmatively.
The EDA Coordinator entered the meeting at 7:40 p.m.
The Director of Public Works stated when Short - Elliott- Hendrickson completed the
traffic study for this area, he believes they may have comprehended a much more
dense development in the Brookdale Square area. He is sure with the changes to
the parking lot and entrances the surrounding streets would be able to handle
more traffic. Councilmember Theis stated he would like this item to come back
6 -27 -88 -5-
before the Council for more review.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
approve for first reading An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 Regarding the Parking
Requirement for Places of Public Assembly and setting a public hearing date for
July 25, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. The motion passed with Councilmembers Lhotka and
Theis opposed.
The City Manager presented An Ordinance Amending Chapter 6 of the City
Ordinances Regarding Administrative Code. He noted this item covers primarily
housekeeping changes and is offered this evening for a first reading.
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott
to approve for first reading An Ordinance Amending Chapter 6 of the City
Ordinances Regarding Administrative Code and setting a public hearing date for
July 25, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 88004 SUBMITTED BY STEVE AND DEBRA HOUGTON
REQUESTING SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL FOR A CARPET CLEANING SERVICE IN THE
RESIDENCE AT 2818 MUMFORD ROAD
The City Manager noted this item was recommended for approval by the Planning
Commission at its June 16, 1988, meeting. The Director of Planning and
Inspection referred the Council to the Planning Commission minutes of June 16,
1988, pages one and two. He explained the reason a special use permit is needed
is because there will be a nonresident employee on the premises to answer the
telephone. He went on to briefly review the conditions recommended by the
Planning Commission. Mayor Nyquist noted that since the three vans are not
commercial vehicles they could legally park on the premises. The Director of
Planning and Inspection agreed that was true but noted the applicant has agreed
to off -site parking for security reasons. He noted the applicant intends to
send the vans home with each worker. He added, however, it could be possible at
some point a vehicle would be parked on the premises. There was some discussion
relative to making a seventh condition so that these vehicles cannot be parked
on the premises.
Councilmember Lhotka inquired if the Fire Department has inspected the premises
because of the chemicals. The Director of Planning and Inspection noted the
Fire Department has not been in for an inspection but it could be done if the
Council so wished.
Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on Planning
Commission Application No. 88004 submitted by Steve and Debra Hougton requesting
special use permit approval for a carpet cleaning service in the residence at
2818 Mumford Road. A resident noted his property abuts the applicants and he is
very concerned with the ossibilit of having three ree or four Y g r lar g e vehicles
parked on these premises. Mayor Nyquist recognized Steve Hougton, the
applicant, who stated since the Planning Commission meeting he has had his
j driveway enlarged so if it is necessary for a vehicle to be on the premises it
will not be on the street but on an improved area. He went on to explain that
generally the trucks are assigned to each driver and they go home with the
I
6 -27 -88 -6-
I
I .
driver. He noted there would be no cleaning of carpets within the residence at
2818 Mumford Road and noted they do not use any type of acids in the cleaning of
their carpeting, only powders and scotch guard.
Councilmember Theis inquired if there would be any way the City could classify
the vehicles so they cannot be claimed as a personal vehicle. Councilmember
Lhotka inquired if a condition could be added allowing only one vehicle which is
used in the business on the premises. Councilmember Theis pointed out if at
some point the business was doing poorly Mr. Hougton could have more of the
vehicles on his premise and claim them as personal vehicles not business
vehicles. The City Attorney noted the condition could be worded "any vehicle
that has been or is being used for the purpose of this business."
Mayor Nyquist inquired if there was anyone else present who wished to speak at
the public hearing. No one requested to speak, and he entertained a motion to
close the public hearing.
There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
close the public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 88004. The
motion passed unanimously.
A brief discussion then ensued relative to additional conditions.
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Hawes
to approve Planning Commission Application No. 88004 subject to the following
conditions:
1. The special use permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances
and regulations, and any violation thereof shall be grounds for
revocation.
2. The special use permit is issued to the applicant and is
nontransferable.
3. All parking associated with the home occupation shall be off - street on
improved space provided by the applicant.
4. Special use permit approval acknowledges the employment on the premises
of not more than one nonresident employee.
5. The premises shall be inspected and improved in accordance with the
requirements set forth by the Building Official with respect to the
home occupation office space prior to the issuance of the special use
permit.
6. No more than one commercial vehicle, consistent with the limitations
imposed by City Ordinances, may be kept on the property.
7. Only one vehicle which has been or is being used in the home occupation
business may be parked in the driveway.
6 -27 -88 -7-
8. The applicant shall provide a fire extinguisher in the area of the home
occupation.
9. The Fire Chief shall review the chemicals associated with the home
occupation that are stored on the site or in a vehicle to assure proper
storage and handling.
The motion passed unanimously.
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 88005 SUBMITTED BY BERNARD HERMAN ARCHITECTS
REQUESTING SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL FOR AN ADDITION TO THE OFFICE
BUILDING LOCATED AT 1915 57TH AVENUE NORTH
The City Manager noted this item was recommended for approval by the Planning
Commission at its June 16, 1988, meeting. The Director of Planning and
Inspection referred the Council to the Planning Commission minutes of June 16,
1988, pages three and four. He went on to explain the application and noted the
project consists of two parts; a solarium addition and construction of wall
partitions within the building. He added the solarium addition will not have
full -time people working in it but will be used as an employee lunch room and
meeting room.
Mayor Nyquist recognized Mr. Bernard Herman, of Bernard Herman Architects, who
explained he is still somewhat confused regarding the utility and trailway
easements. He stated he was not sure if the total amount of easements were 15
feet from the property line or if the five foot trailway easement was included
within the utility easement. The Director of Public Works stated he believed
the utility and sidewalk easement overlap. A brief discussion then ensued
regarding the easements, and the City Manager pointed out if there is some
confusion regarding these easements, the item should be tabled.
Mayor Nyquist then recognized Mr. Milavitz, the owner of the building. Mr.
Milavitz stated he did not feel it was proper to delay the use of his building
because of questions over utility and trailway easements. He added he felt it
was extremely unfair to hold up use because of these easements. He stated it
appears he has two options open, one of those being legal action.
Mayor Nyquist inquired if Mr. Milavitz had any problems granting the City the
easement. Mr. Milavitz stated if the easement does not interfere with the use
of his property, he would be more than happy to grant the easement, but if it
does interfere with the use of his property, he does not want to grant the
easement.
Councilmember Theis made a motion to table Planning Commission Application No.
88005 until all easement questions are clarified. Councilmember Lhotka seconded
the motion for purposes of a discussion.
I ;I Councilmember Lhotka inquired if there would be any documentation available in
the Director of Public Works' or City Engineer's office to answer the
applicant's questions this evening. The Director of Public Works stated it
would not be possible to come to a conclusion on this issue without knowing all
the facts. He pointed out the City Engineer has been working on this, and he is
not present this evening. Councilmember Lhotka inquired of the City Attorney if
6 -27 -88
I
the Council is correct in taking this tabling action. The City Attorney stated
he does not fully understand what the granting of an easement has to do with
approval of a site plan. He inquired of the Director of Planning and Inspection
if these easements were currently in place. The Director of Planning and
Inspection responded negatively and stated the City is seeking the easement now
because of street improvements in the area. He noted the City is willing to
compensate the applicant for the easement.
Mr. Herman inquired if the solarium was not going to be built and only basic
remodeling was being done within the building, would there be a need to appear
before the Planning Commission or_the City Council for approval. The Director
of Planning and Inspection stated the only thing that would be required is that
a building permit be taken for the remodeling inside. He pointed out that the
easement question is not stopping Mr. Malivetz' business from moving in.
Councilmember Scott stated she felt the whole easement issue is quite clear, and
that Mr. Herman was the only person that was truly confused.
Mayor Nyquist called for a vote on the aforementioned motion regarding tabling
of Planning Commission Application No. 88005. The motion passed with
Councilmembers Scott and Hawes opposed.
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO 88006 SUBMITTED BY ROBERT REGAN REQUESTING
SITE AND BUILDING PLAN AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL FOR AN ADDITION TO THE
OSSEO BROOKLYN BUS COMPANY GARAGE AT 4435 68TH AVENUE NORTH
The City Manager noted this item was recommended for approval by the Planning
Commission at its June 16, 1988, meeting. The Director of Planning and
Inspection referred the Council to pages four through six of the June 16, 1988,
Planning Commission minutes and the attached information sheet. He noted the
bus garage is a special use within the C2 zoning district. .- He went on to
briefly explain the application and noted a special use permit and permanent
improvements to the site would be required to allow for storage of the overflow
cars from the car dealerships on Brooklyn Boulevard. He added a public hearing
has been scheduled for this evening and notices have been sent. He briefly
reviewed the 12 conditions recommended for this application.
Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on Planning
Commission Application No. 88006 submitted by Robert Regan requesting site and
building plan and special use permit approval for an addition to the Osseo
Brooklyn Bus Company garage at 4435 68th Avenue North. He inquired if there was
anyone present who wished to speak at the public hearing. No requested to
P p one re
g q
speak, and he entertained a motion to close the public hearing.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
close the public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 88006. The
motion passed unanimously.
There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka
to approve Planning Commission Application No. 88006 subject to the following
conditions:
6 -27 -88 -9-
1. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building
Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of
permits.
2. Grading, drainage, utility and berming plans are subject to review and
approval by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of permits.
3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an
amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted prior
to the issuance of permits.
4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop mechanical equipment
shall be appropriately screened from view.
S. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing
system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central
monitoring device in accordance with Chapter S of the City Ordinances.
6. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped
areas to facilitate site maintenance.
7. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter
34 of the City Ordinances.
8. B612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving
areas.
9. The plans shall be modified prior to consideration by the City Council
to indicate a parking delineator (B612 curb and gutter) at the east end
of the row of parking along the north side of the lot (in the newly
paved area).
10. The special use permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances
and regulations and any violation thereof shall be grounds for
revocation.
11. Parking of cars on the north portion of the property by off -site auto
dealerships is strictly prohibited unless and until a separate special
use permit is granted for such use.
12. The conveyance of additional runoff from the expanded parking lot to
the I -694 right of way is subject to approval by MNDOT.
The motion passed unanimously.
RECESS
The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 9 p.m. and reconvened at 9:21.p.m.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR SHINGLE CREEK WATERSHED AND FOR WEST MISSISSIPPI WATERSHED
The City Manager noted the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission and the West
6 -27 -88 -10-
Mississippi Watershed Commission were formed by Joint Powers Agreements in 1984
to meet the requirements of the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act. He
noted these commissions have now developed its draft plans and have submitted
them to the member cities for review and comment. He added the commissions will
hold public hearings on their plans. He stated a representative of Eugene A.
Hickock & Associates is present this evening to provide a summary presentation
of the plans to the Council. The Director of Public Works introduced Bill
Weidenbacher of Hickock & Associates. Mr. Weidenbacher gave a slide
presentation which briefly reviewed the two management plans being submitted by
the two watershed commissions.
The Director of Public Works noted the Shingle Creek Watershed Management
Commission has been working with the Engineering Department to complete a study
on the Twin Lake and Ryan Creek areas to determine what can be done to control
the flood levels in area lakes. He noted interim standards were set and
strictly enforced to protect the watershed districts while the management plans
were being developed. The Director of Public Works explained the City will
follow up these management plans with the development of its own watershed
management plan. He noted the City will have to include funds in the 1990
budget for development of this plan. He pointed out at this time the plan has
not gone into great detail on water quality management, but this is an area to
expect greater detail on in the future.
Councilmember Lhotka inquired how these management plans affect the citizens of
l i Brooklyn Center. The Director of Public Works stated these management plans
would not have any affect on current residential areas within the City, but they
will apply to new development or redevelopment of commercial and industrial
properties.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -112
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE SHINGLE CREEK WATERSHED
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Rich Theis, and the motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -113
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE WEST MISSISSIPPI WATERSHED
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Rich Theis, and the motion passed unanimously.
WATER USE RESTRICTIONS - UPDATE
The Director of Public Works noted staff is gathering and analyzing additional
information from other cities, but it has been difficult gathering some of this
information from the other cities because they are so busy. He went on to
briefly review the water usage through June 22, 1988. He added some cities have
reported that its daily usage has actually increased since starting the odd -
even system. He stated staff is recommending no change at this time.
6 -27 -88 -11-
Councilmember Theis inquired why the other cities are not capable of telling
staff how much water it pumps on a particular date. The Director of Public
Works stated the other cities would manually have to check its records and are
too busy at this time to be able to get the detailed information. Councilmember
Theis inquired if Brooklyn Center is the only City with this type of
sophisticated system. The Director of. Public Works stated there are a few
systems within the metro area.
Councilmember Lhotka left the table at 10:25 p.m.
Councilmember Theis inquired why a so many other cities were using the odd -even
system. The Director of Public Works noted that only about one -third of the
cities listed in the Star Tribune article are using the odd -even system, and a
great number of them use the odd -even system plus restricting the hours. He
noted this type of system would be much more restrictive than what we are
currently using.
Councilmember Lhotka returned to the table at 10:27 p.m.
Councilmember Theis inquired why the other cities are using the odd -even system.
The Director of Public Works stated apparently these cities feel it is working
for them, but he is not totally convinced that it will work for Brooklyn Center,
and the last couple years experience backs up his feelings.
CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO 1988 OMNIBUS TAX BILL
The City Manager noted the Municipal Legislative Commission which is composed of
15 metropolitan suburbs has voted to pursue a legal challenge to the disparity
reduction aid provided as part of the 1988 Omnibus Tax Bill. He noted the
policy in itself is not unconstitutional. However, the method the legislature
has adopted to distribute disparity aid can create a nonuniform tax on the same
class of subjects by the same taxing authority and therefore may be
constitutionally flawed.
The Director of Public Works left the table at 10:32 p.m.
The City Manager stated at this time staff is not making any recommendations but
noted the bill is not beneficial to the metropolitan area taxpayer but can be
somewhat beneficial for the municipality. The City Attorney stated out of all
the cities his firm represents, it only found one city which would be affected
by this tax bill next year. He stated he does not believe this bill will affect
Brooklyn Center at all in 1989. There was a general consensus among
Councilmembers that City staff should keep an eye on this bill.
RECOMMENDED USE FOR PROPERTY AT 65TH AND BROOKLYN BOULEVARD
The EDA Coordinator briefly reviewed the area in question and noted there are a
number of development problems associated with this area. He noted the vacant
property has significant soil problems, and access to the undeveloped site is
limited making development of the property more difficult. He stated it appears
the current zoning of this property is inconsistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and the desires of the neighborhood. He added at this time
this particular area is not a high priority area for City development. He
stated staff is recommending the Council refer the rezoning of this property to
6 -27 -88 -12-
I
j
the Planning Commission for its consideration.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
refer the rezoning of the property in question to the Planning Commission for
its consideration and recommendations. The motion passed unanimously,
ANOKA COUNTY LRT STUDY
The City Manager stated Anoka County has shown some interest in considering some
of the light rail transit options serving Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park
14 which were dropped from the Northwest Light Rail Transit recommendation. He
4 stated he believes this is a step in the right direction because the proposals
that were submitted for the Northwest Light Rail Transit did not fully address
the City's service needs.
There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka
to support the concept of being included in the Anoka Light Rail Transit study.
The motion passed unanimously.
ANNUAL AUDITED FINANCIAL REPORT
The Finance Director stated the City Charter requires the financial audit be
submitted by June 30 of each year. He stated staff is requesting an extension
of this deadline to July 25, 1988.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka
to grant the extension of the deadline for submitting the financial audit until
July 25, 1988. The motion passed unanimously.
The City Manager noted there would be an executive session of the City Council
held after adjournment of the City Council meeting and the Economic Development
Authority meeting.
t
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City
Council adjourned at 10:55 p.m.
{
City Clerk Mayor
6 -27 -88 -13-