Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994 12-19 CCP Regular Session 1� � je S c CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ✓Y CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DECEMBER 19, 1994 7 p.m. 1. Call to Order 6 Z 2. Roll Call C, )C S 5� �� 6Z,� 5 D 3. Opening Ceremonies We k b2 1 b 9 6 1 4. Open Forum 5. Council Report 6. Presentation: a. Riverwood Neighborhood Association l 7. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda PP g -All items listed with an asterisk are considered to routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no. s parate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which eve t the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal ence on the agenda. 8. Approval of Minutes: PP a. November 14, 1994 - Executive Session 1994 - Regular Session V 1 b. November 14, c. November 21, 1994 - Special Work Session d. November 28, 1994 - Regular Session e. December 5, 1994 - Special Work Session f. December 7, 1994 - Budget Hearing 9. Ordinances: (7:15 p.m.) o � — 7 % 1 � i < a. An Ordinance Amending 2 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter -This item was first read on September 12, 1994, and tabled by the City Council to October 24, 1994; approved for first reading on October 24, 1994; published��� in the City's official newspaper on November 2, 1994; tabled by the City Council on November 14 and 28, 1994; and is offered this evening for a public hearing and second reading. If all Councilmembers are not present, this item should �- be tabled to the January 9, 1995, City Council meeting. b. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Zoning J Classification of Certain Land (Lutheran Church of the Master) -This ordinance was first read on November 14, 1994, published in the City's official newspaper on November 23, 1994, and is offered this evening for a public hearing and second reading. LY L C e -se 0P, 7' ?Y 1. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- December 19, 1994 c. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Zoning P�n Classification of Certain Land (Country Harvest Buffet) -This ordinance was first read on November 28, 1994, published in the official l newspaper on December 7, 1994, and is offered this evening for a public hearin4�_ and second reading. 6pC� - 1 1 . k 5 5-c C 5 / D e - / �� - 7 10. Planning Commission: a. Planning Commission Application No. 94015 submitted by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Request for site and building plan approval to construct a 1 square foot addition to the inspection area and remodeling of general office area located at 5930 Shingle Creek Parkway. This application was �� y , recommended by the Planning Commission at its December 8, 1994 meeting. 11. Public Hearings: (7 :30 p.m.) Gpt*t - 7 5�O C , Z9 a. Relating to the Modification of Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the Creation of Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 1. Resolution Modifying the Redevelopment Plan for Housing Development and fy g P g P J Redevelopment Pro No. 1 Establishin g Tax Increment Financing District i+vv P ,g �� • No. 03, and Approving and Adopting the Tax Increment Plan Related Thereto, Located Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No 1 I / r, — y 47 4/-Q73 7 b. Continued Public Hearing Re: Certain Tabled Proposed Special Assessments, Improvement Project No. 1990 -10, 69th Avenue Recons ctiorrv� --1 9; ! I c d 8 K• q —A78 -- �, Initial Application for Private Kennel License at 6312 France Avenue North () �/ r- A-1 Uri 4-1✓ �z 12. Discussion Items: a. Appointment of Chief of Police 9q • A f 7 4q-�0 ' f 1. Resolution Finalizing the City Manager's Appointment of a Chief of Police b. Adoption of Budgets for the Year 1995 and 1995 Capital Improvements Plan 1. Resolution to Adopt the 1995 Proposed Budget c for the ^ Central Garage Internal Service Fund JL ) / CS � L-- 1-t R q - %L IV T 2. Resolution to Adopt the 1995 Proposed Budgets for the Special R venue Funds and the Enterprise Funds C5 I*Ll C� 944169 Note: At this point in the agen adj ou ity oun H and convene as BRA -take action on items of the genda, then adjourn as HRA and convene a;;o;nvenas a action on items of the EDA agenda, then adjourn as EDA and City Council. r �J CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- December 19, 1994 3. Resolution to Authorize a Final Tax Levy for 1995 Appropriations for the General Fund, the Street Improvement Debt Service Fund, the E.D.A. Fund, and the H.R.A. Fund Budgets 09 1 r'q / u ✓1 in q t- r7 4. Resolution Approving a Final Tax Capacity Levy for the Purpose of Defraying the Cost of Operation, Providing Informational Service, and Relocation Assistance Pursuant to the Provisions of MSA 469.001 Through 469.047 of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center for the Year 1995 0 ) 2— Cti 1 14- 9-11 — 5. Resolution to Adopt the 1995 Proposed Budget for the General Fund, the Street Improvement Debt Service Fund, the E.D.A. Fund, and the H.R.A. Fund and the 1995 Capital Improvements Program CS 13 d - ft 1 � C. Staff Report Re: Special Assessments for Storm Drainage Improvements and the No &K ' ssessment Stabilization Program 1. Resolution Ado�the Brooklyn Center Specibi Assessment Policy d. Staff Report Re: Hennepin County Brooklyn Boulevard Street Improvement N Bk Project, Cooperative Agreement, and nhancement roject 1 'Af - a -7 Z 1. Resolut roposal and Awarding Contract for Professional e Services for Preliminary Design, Improvement Project No. 1994 -14, LLB Brooklyn Boulevard Street Improvement, 65th Avenue to 71st Avenue T. Federal Grant Proposal C S )L.14 Ca r ( Pc- b V e. COPS F.A.S. po l f. 1995 Pay Plan and 1995 Collective Bargaining Agreement for Local 49 (Maintenance) 1. Resolutio Setting Wages and Salaries for the Calendar Year 1995 ° �e "-- 13. Resolutions: • a. Amending the 1994 and 1995 General Fund Budget to Carry Forward Approved Appropriations in the Amount of $500 for Initial Costs Associated with Police Mobile Digital Terminals (MDT's) M ILAA--" L Y — a • b. Amending the 1994 and 1995 General Fund Budget to Carry Forward Approved Appropriations in the Amount of $62,000 for the Hennepin County Photo Imaging System 9 y- • c. Amending the 1994 General Fund Budget to Rescind Approved Appropriation �g from the Drug Forfeiture Fund in the Amount of $1,500 for State of Minnesota / Traffic Accident Report Computer Software that is Unavailabl �/ -;g b Q�,,�� • d. Expressing Recognition of and Appreciation f r the Dedicated Public Service of Investigator Donald Spehn �r ��2 n Oqy/ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -4- December 19, 1994 • e. Accepting Proposal and Awarding Contract for Professional Services, 199 -0 04, 57th Avenue Street Improvement �� �� / (• ``''� 9 6 • f. Amending Administrative Fee Schedule for Watershed Commission Fees for Project Reviews an d Varian ce Requests t" 9'y- 213 • g. Amending Special Assessment Levy Roll No. 13132 to Provide for the Award of Assessment Stabilization Grants 1 ��/J / � _ b • h. Giving Preliminary Approval to the Issuance of Tax - Exempt Bonds 7d Authorizing Application for Allocation of Bonding Authority � q --A ' • i. Amending Resolution No. 94 -257, Accepting Bid and Awarding Contracts for eel Improvement Project No. 1993 -18, Contract 1994 -Q, Residential Structure Removal (Park & Ride /Storm Pond Site) 14. Licenses �.�a -✓t 9y a� �.F 15. Consideration of 1995 Liquor Licenses S / -A4 16. Adjournment coweil Meetmg DAW ueceM " 17T. 31 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda uem Numbor �: Request For Council Consideration Item Description: City Council Minutes November 14, 1994 - Executive Session November 14, 1994 - Regular Session November 21, 1994 - Special Work Session November 28, 1994 - Regular Session December 5, 1994 - Special Work Session December 7, 1994 - Budget Hearing Department Approval: Sharon Knutson, Deputy City Clerk Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached _J MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA EXECUTIVE SESSION NOVEMBER 14, 1994 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in executive session at 6:34 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Todd Paulson, Councilmembers Celia Scott, Dave Rosene, and Kristen Mann. Also present were Assistant City Manager Nancy Go hman and City Attorney Charlie LeFevere. Councilmember Barb Kalligher was excused from the meeting. DISCUSSION The City Council discussed threatened litigation regarding Data Practices. ADJOURNMENT The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned executive session at 6:49 p.m. City Clerk Todd Paulson, Mayor 11/14/94 - 1 - MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 1N Tkih COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION NOVEMBER 14 1994 CITY HALL CALL To ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Todd Paulson at 7;03 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Todd Paulson, Councilmembers Celia Scott, Dave Rosene, and Kristen Mann. Also present were Assistant City Manager Nancy Gohman, Director of Public Services Diane Spector, Planning and Zoning Specialist Ron Warren, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Council Secretary Barb Collman. Councilmmber Barb Kalligher was excused from tonight's meeting. OPENING CEREMONIE Buy Scout Troop 401 performed a flag ceremony, Dean Nyquist offered the invocation. OPEN FOIti�M Debra Hiistrom, 3509 66th Avenue North, is a Councilmember elect. She asked tho Council to consider finalizing decisions on two issues before the end of the present Council's term. The Humboldt Avenuc issue would be, better resolved by the present Council since a new Council would need time to study and be brought up to date on the status, which would be a disservice to the concerned residents. The, process of reviewing the performance of the City Manager should be completed by the present Council which is able to judge the City Manager's performance on the whole, Terry Precht, 7141 Fremont Avenue North, is a member of the Humboldt Avenue task force. He spoke regarding the traffic on i)upont and Newton Avenues. There is concern because now traffic is by passing to other streets, resulting in heavier, faster traffic on those streets. He felt the stop signs, which he voted for as a representative of the residents, are a hazard and have not reduced the speed of traffic. He noted the streets are for public use and people do what they want to do. He noted the City Council represents the entire community, not just a vocal group of Humboldt Avenue residents. The public will not speak 11 ' 1 " up about the situation until there is a bad accident. A "quick fix" is not the answer. Rather, the Council should pass a plan for the city to save money for reconstruction in the future, Councilmember Rosene inquired whether it is allowed procedure to "save up" for a specific project. The Director of Public Services said using State Aid allows the City to keep a balance to a certain mwdmum, after which no more State Aid is allotted. She felt Mr, Precht had been referring to the City waiting until the bonds for the 69th Avenue project were paid off, which would free up funds for project. COUNCIL REPORTS The Assistant City Manager noted an element of tonight's meeting is the trial of the call -in feature for cable broadcast viewers. Councilmember Rosene commented another trial of the call -in line might be in order since tonight's agenda is rather short. Mayor Paulson stated the City's Heritage Festival had been a successful family activity. He noted the festival gets "bigger and better" each year. Councilmember Rosene inquired about a resolution commending those who worked on the Heritage Festival. The Assistant City Manager said a resolution would be drafted. APPROVAL QF AGENDA AND CQNSENT_AGENDA Mayer Paulson inquired if any Councilmember requested any items be removed from the consent agenda. No requests were made. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Mann to approve the November 14, 1994, agenda and consent agenda as printed. The motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Scott suggested the consent agenda items might be read aloud for the purpose of informing these viewing the meeting on cable broadcast. Mayor Paulson agreed and read the items, APPROVAL OF MINUM 0QFQfiER 24, 1994 - REGULAR SESSION There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Mann to approve the minutes of October 24, 1994, regular session as printed. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION NO. 94 -233 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved Its adoption: 11/14/94 - 2 - RESOLUTION REFUNDING OF AN INITIAL BOND OFFERING; REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTL✓S, SECTIONS 469.152 TO 469.1651, ON BEHALF OF 13ROOKDALE TWO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kristen Mann, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLJJTION N 94 -234 Mumber Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION URGING THE LEGISLATURE CORRECT THE IMBALANCE OF PROPERTY TAX BASE AND PUBLIC IN VESTMENT IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kristen Mann, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -2 5 Member C-olia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF SIX (6) HANDI TALKIES FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kristen Mann, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -236 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AMENDING 1995 RECYCLING RATES The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kristen Mann, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -237 Member Celia Scott intrudu(;ed the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1993 -18, CONTRACT 1994-Q, RESIDENTIAL STRUCTt lRF REMOVAL (PARK & RIDE/STQRM POND SITE) The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kristen Mann, and the motion passed unanimously. 11/14/94 -3 - RESOLUTION NO, 94 -238 Mcmbcr Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AMENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVY ROLL NOS. 13131 AND 13132 TO PROVIDE FOR THE AWARD. OF ASSESSMENT STA131Li1A110N GRANTS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kristen Mann, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -239 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DEVELOPMENT OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH MINNEAPOLIS REGARDING THE PROPOSED SHINGLE CREEK REGIONAL POND The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kristen Mann, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -240 hfeniber Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption; RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING DEVELOPMENT OF AN RFP FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECI' NO. 1995 -04, REPLACEMENT OF LIFT STATION NO. 1 AND FORGE MAIN The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kristen Mann, and the motion Passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO, 94 -241 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1994-20 WATERMAIN REPAIR Al' 1 -94 AND DUPONT AVENUE NORTH (CONTRACT 1994 -K) The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kristen Mann, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -242 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and mvvCd its adoption: 11/14/94 -4- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1994 -27, CONTRACT 1994 -N, ANNUAL SANITARY SEWER T.Y. INSPECTIONS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kristen Mann, and the motion passed unanimously, RESOLUTION NO, 94 -243 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: z F APPROVING HANGS ORDER NO. 1 R IMPROVEMENT O RESOLUTION APPRO I G C PROJECT NO. 1994 -01 & 02, CONTRACT 1994 -E, JAMESfKNOX/54TH AVENUES IMPROVEMENT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kristen Mann, and the motion passed unanimously. LICENSES There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Mann to approve the following list of licenses: CHRISTMAS TREE SALES LOT Buildor's Square 36UO 63rd Avenue N. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Andenon Heating and Air Conditioning 4347 Central Avenue N.E. RENTAL DWELLINGS Re.newal: Ralph T. Guimont 5903 Ilalifax Placc N, Lenny Mazurek 4200 Lakebreeze Avenue N. Duane Christiansen 5400 Sailor Lane Henry R. Johnson 6736 Scott Avenue N. SIGN HANGER Attracta Sign 7424 W. Lake Street The motion passed unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - CON'T- INUEDD OCTOBER 17, 1994 - WORK SESSION 11/14/94 - 5 - There was a motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve the minutes of the October 17, 1994, work session as printed. The motion passed unanimously, NOVEMBER 8. 1994 - SPECIALSESSION There was a motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Roselle to approve the minutes of the November 8, 1994, special session as printed. The motion passed unanimously, Councilmember Scott asked the minutes be corrected to show she was present at the meeting from 9 p.m. to 10:45 p.m. but found it necessary to leave due to an illness in her family, 0RDINAIsTCE The City Manager presented An Ordinance Amending Chapter 2 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter, This item was first read on September 12, 1994, and tabled by the Council to October 24, 1994; approved for first reading on October 24, 1994; published in the City's official newspaper on November 2,1994; and is offered this evening for a public hearing and second reading. The Assistant City Manager noted the Charter Commission had not met and recommended the public hearing be opened and continued until November 28, 1994. She added a recommendation from the City Attorney is also necessary. Councilmember Scott commented it would be in order to continue the hearing until the Charter Commission has time to meet since it is a matter of housekeeping items. Mayor Paulson opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on An Ordinance Amending Chapter 2 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter at 7:13 p.m. He inquired if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council. No one came forward. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Rosene to close the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Rusene to table the matter of the ordinance until a later date, The motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NQ, 94009 The Assistant City Manager presented Planning Commission Application ,No. 94009 suhmitted by Evangelical Lutheran Church of the Master. Request for rezoning and 11/14/94 -6- development plan approval for a Planned Unit Development involving the Church located at 1200 69th Avenue North and three apartment buildings located to the east at 1100 69th Avenue North, 1107 Emerson Land and 6907 Dupont Avenue North. This application was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at its October 27, 1994 meeting. The Planning and Zoning Specialist explained the zoning districts and uses involved in the consideration. Currently, the church building is designated R1 and the apartinent buildings are designated R4. The rezoning would be to PUD/R1 for all of the properties. The buildings are being purchased on a contract for deed basis and significant structural changes will not be made until the contract for deed is satisfied. However, smile modifications are allowed to make the buildings more accessible for public use. The building official has stated smoke detectors are needed in each unit and in the hallways, and additional exits may be necessary. The three phases of development were outlined. Phase I, the immediate change, would involve using the closest apartment building for religious education each Sundays and one week night each week. The second and third apartment buildings would continue to be used as apartments during this phase. Phase II would include the use of the second apartment building for small and large group activities. This phase would not be implemented until approximatcly 1996. Phase III plans would involve using the third building for a missions offices and counselling center, as well as retaining two apartment units for use as short -term living units by missionaries. This phase would be implemented in approximately 1997. The Planning.and Zoning Specialist recommended that platting be done all at one time. This would be done after the purchase of the property is completed and would also require review by the watershed district, The church has not yet developed the required final site and building plan and landscaping plan. These plans will be prepared prior to implementing Phase 11 in 1995. The application was recommended by the Planning Commission in light of the considerations and conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution Number 94 -1 which he reviewed for the City Council. The Planning and Zoning Specialist stated notices had been sent out and representatives of the church were present for questioning. Councilmember Rosene asked when watershed issues would be addressed. The Planning and Zoning Specialist answered they would be addressed prior to Phase 11. Councilmember Rosenc asked whether there is any preliminary idea of expected watershed requirements and the effort necessary to meet them. The Planning and Zoning Specialist said the requirements could be reviewed. The church should get recommendations from an engineer. He mentioned ponding and water storage as possible requirements. He added 11/14/94 -7- the goal is a campus -like atmosphere. Some parking may be eliminated, landscaping will most likely be added, and there will probably be less storage. Councilmember Rosene indicated the church should be considering the whole picture in terms of requirements for the development. He added more pavement has a negative impact on the watershed requirements. Councilmember Mann commented the plan outlines a good use of the buildings. She felt the Planning Commission had prepared the proposal well. Mayor Paulson said he likes the phasing element of the plan. The church is active and is a benefit to the community. The plan fits in well in the community and provides opportunities which dovetail with other community activities. The Assistant City Manager presented a Resolution Regarding Disposition of Planning Commission Application No. 94009 submitted by the Evangelical Lutheran Church of the Master. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -244 Mcmbcr Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and movod its adoption: RESOLUTION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO, 94009 SUBMITTED BY THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF THE MASTER The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Scott asked whether a date had been set for a public hearing on the ordinance amendment. The Planning and Zoning Specialist said he was not sure but the date would be set when the item is published. The Assistant City Manager presented An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Zoning Classification of Certain Land. There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Mann to approve first reading of An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Zoning Classification of Certain Land. The motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NQ, 94013 The Assistant City Manager presented Planning Commission Application No. 94013 submitted by Irene A. Klammer, Request for preliminary approval for Klammer Addition to subdivide into two lots an approximate 35,150 square foot lot located at 1521 73rd Avenue North. This application for preliminary plat approval was recommended for 11114/94 -8- approval by the Planning Commission at its October 27, 1994, meeting. She also pointed out that the applicant was seeking final plat approval at the same time. The Planning and Zoning Specialist described the planned Klammer Addition. The northerly lot contains a single - family home and accessory building. The southerly lot would have a single- family home and accessory building developed. The minimum requirements of zoning arc exceeded in this situation. The proposed utility easements will meet the subdivision regulations. The Planning and Zoning Specialist stated the Planning Commission had recommended the application subject to the following three conditions which be reviewed for the City Council. The Planning and Zoning Specialist noted both Preliminary Plat Approval and Final Plat Approval are being sought concurrently. Items needed before final plat approval are title opinion and Iegal work, and county approval. The Director of Public Senices commented it is unusual for preliminary approval and final approval to be made concurrently; however, in this case, the requirements are simple and straightforward. Councilmember Rosene questioned whether the approval is granted by motion rather than resolution. The Director of Public Services said a motion is in order. Councilmember Mann asked whether it is appropriate to give final approval subject to the conditions. The Director of Public Services said it is appropriate and the City staff will make sure all conditions are satisfied for release of the final plat. Councilmember Scott asked who will sign -off on the condition requiring the City Engineer since there is no one in that position at the current time. The Director of Public Services said the requirement can be reviewed by anyone with engineering knowledge and background, Councilmember Scott commented she would not want to see the plat approval held up for lack of a City Engineer. She inquired about the status of the search for applicants for the position. The Assistant City Manager said a decision has been made to postpone the search for a City Engineer until after the holiday season. There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Mann to approve Planning Commission application No. 94013 subject to the following conditions: 1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 11/14/94 -9- 2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 3. Woodbine Lane is to be dedicated on the final plat as a 30 foot right -of -way. The motion passed unanimously. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Mann to give Final Plat Approval of the Klammer Addition subject to satisfaction of the listed cunditions. The motion passed unanimously, DISCUSSION ITEMS REPORT ON ADOPT-A-PARKnTAIIjSTRE PROGR The Assistant City Manager presented a Resolution Expressing Rccoiitlon and Appreciation for the Public Service of Organizations Participating in Brooklyn Center's Ado P t -A -Park, Adopt -A- Trail, and Adopt -A- Street Programs. The Assistant City Manager noted this program is in its third year and 37 groups have participated. City's She expressed the Li s thanks to the Director of Public Scrtiices and other p P involved Staff, with special recognition to Joyce Gulseth for her organization efforts. The Director of Public Services stated the program is growing, which is an indication of din much mare support. She said volunteers have expressed an interest m doing community supp xP than picking up litter and are becoming involved in areas such as planting and maintenance. She said she wished to commend Joyce Gulseth and also recognize and thank Tom Bublitz, Bob Cahlander, Ole Nelson, Sharon Schmidt and Arnie Mavis. She mentioned the posse 'bility of a kick -off activity for the program in the spring. She also noted some groups have begun to adopt streets and major trail systems. Mayor Paulson also thanked the program volunteers and staff for the great job they have done. He said such a human resource indicates promise for the future of the program. Hu also noted certificates of recognition have been sent to those involved. Councilmember Scott expressed concern over a seasonal problem which occurs in the fall. She said trash is often dumped on the borders of the river and she has discovered it is dumped by non - residents of Brooklyn Center. She asked the cooperation of citizens walking dumping occur. They should take down the vehicle license river who see illegal Y along the g P g plate number and notify the police department. The park volunteers should not have to feel their work is in vain, The Director of Public Services agreed with Councilmember Scott and added there is a cost to the City in labor to remove the illegally dumped materials. She said the City Staff would appreciate assistance from the residents in deterring dumping. 11/14/94 _10- RESOLUTION NO. 94 -245 Mcmbcr Celia Suvtt introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION AND APPRECIATION FOR THE PUBLIC SERVICE OF ORGANIZATION'S PARTICIPATING IN BROOKLYN CENTER'S ADOPT -A -PARK ADOPT -A- TRAIL, AND ADOPT- A- STRRF.T PROGRAMS The motion fot the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Dave Rosene, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTIONS - CONTINUED The Assistant City Manager noted oil contamination was found during the Central Garage renovation project. The Assistant City Manager presented a Resolution Amending Improvement Project No. 1993 -19, Central Garage Improvements, to Rcmcdiate Oil Tani: Soil Contamination. The Director of Public Services said there will be a cost to the City for the remediation of the problem. She explained the Central Garage was constructed in the mid- seventies. Evidently, at the time of construction a vent pipe was connected improperly, resulting in an overflow soaking into the soil. The contaminated soil has now been removed and standard procedures are being followed. She also stated the worst scenario is oil may have entered the ground water. In that case, it would be necessary to install test wells and there would be a monitoring expense. Testing is currently being done. The Director of Public Services said some costs of the remediation are eligible for 90 percent reimbursement from MPCA. The final cost may be around $22,000, depending on how many costs are eligible for rcimbwsement. Mayor Paulson asked whether Staff is satisfied the source of the leak has been found. The Director of Public Services said Staff is very confident of the source based on the location of the oil found. Councilmember Rosene inquired about the status of the Central Garage construction. The Director of Public Services said construction is moving slowly. The contractor is presently two weeks behind the desired plan. The, footings for the new addition have been poured and walls are going up. The structure needs to be closed in for winter and the completion of the inside work. Shc believes Phase I will be completed in January and the remodeling and HVAC work will be completed by mid- spring 1995, as planned. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -246 Mcmbcr Cclia Scott introduced the fallowing resolution and moved its adoption: 11/14/94 - 11 - RESOLUTION AMENDING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1993 -19, CENTRAL GARAGE IMP ROVEMENT S, TO REIMIEDIA.TE OIL TANK SOIL CONTAMINATION The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Dave R osunc, and the motion passed unanimously. DISCUSSION Mayor Paulson asked for an update concerning the calls received on the trial call -in line durin g tonight's 7ht's meetin g . There was a eneraI discussion can _ g concerning the g call in trial whiIc the transcription of C1117tt1ct11s wa obtained. Councilmember Rosene said he was glad the call -in idea had been attempted. Regarding earlier business, Councilmember Rosene asked whether it would be possible for 111C park, to have call -in boxes like those along highways so citizens could call to report dumping, Councilmember Scott noted the call -in boxes arc very expensive. Councilmember Mann stated the Park and Recreation Commission is considering instituting a "Park Watch" program encouraging call -in tips. A Th Assistant City Ma distr ty g to utcd coples of the comments received on the call - lint during the meeting. Mayor Paulson thanked residents for watching and calling in. He declared the effort a success for tonight. The Assistant City Manager noted the call -in lines were now closed, She suggested the ii coinnl i cy C la m� he read aloud for the vieWeTS. Mayor Paulson read the comments received on the call - in line tonight. They were as follows: 1. "What's the status of the performance evaluation for Gerald Splinter? When can we read this, or when will it be available to the public ?" ?. (General question about what the call -in line is for by someone who tuned in late). 3. (Someone called in to see if the line was working. Said he'd call back later). 4. One viewer responded to open forum regarding Humboldt Avenue. "Only solution to Humboldt Avenue is to buy the houses on one side of the block and widen the road like they did on 69th; 11/14/94 -12- 5. Re Humboldt Avenue: "The City Council should buy out the citizens between 69th and 73rd and widen the road." Also is very concerned about the COPS program and the lack of support by the police department Used to have foot patrol, too. Viewer lives in the area, moved in because of the positive changes he saw happening in the neighborhood. Sees the neighborhood going back to the way it used to be. 6. Concerned about the COPS program and the lack of attention the Council is paying to this important program. 7. Lack of commitment to the COPS program. Best thing the City has done in a prcvuntative way. Police are doing a good job. Don't abandon this program? S. Disappointed in the lack of support by the police department for the COPS program. 9. Council failed to realize that new garage could have been built for what they're paying for remodeling. Why does City need a paint room? Mayor Paulson said these were good comments and questions. Councilmember Rosene clarified that usually all comments would not be read aloud. Councilmember Rosenc addressed Question No. 1 and stated the performance evaluation would be confidential and not available to the public. He also said the caller of Question No. 9 should call back for more discussion. Councilmember Rosene asked whether the Council is satisfied with this trial or would like to schedule more call -in trials. Councilmember Mann noted only one trial had been approved by the Council. Mayor Paulson said he would like to have at least one more trial to see if the set -up works and is worthwhile. Councilmember Mann said she could not support additional trials of the call -in line when the callers are anonymous. There needs to be verification of who is calling since there could be an issue which would merit being put on the agenda. Mayor Paulson suggested making it the caller's decision whether or not to identify himbelf/herself. Requiring identification might deter a citizen from calling. it is up to the Councilmembers to give credibility to anonymous calls. 11/14/94 - 13 - Councilmember Scott asked how the call -in phones would be manned. The Assistant City Manager said part -time staff is paid straight time to answer the phones and note comments. Councilmember Scott felt there should not be a call -in for the entire time of a lengthy agenda. Maybe the call -in line could end at 11 p.m, Mayor Paulson said that issue could be flexible. Mayor Paulson said the questions and comments will not always be read aloud. It will be up to the Mayor and Councilmembers to take action on comments and questions as desired_ The Assistant City Manager mentioned if Council wished to have another trial of the call -in luie un November 28, there could be a limit set of 7 p.m. to WO p.m. and Staff manning the phones could ask callers for identification. Councilmember Rosene said he would prefer callers not be constrained to a certain time slot. 11c agreed it would be good to get identification but he also agreed with Mayor Paulson that input is good regardless of whether the caller is identified. He agreed with the Assistant City Manager that identification be requested, There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene the call -in line be given another trial in wliich uillers are asked to identify themselves but comments are accepted regardless of whether or not names are given. Mayor Paulson asked whether the line would be open until 10 p.m. Councilmember Rosene was satisfied with 9;30 p.m. or 9 p.m. Councilmember Scott agreed with another trial but emphasized identification of callers is important so Councilmembers can return their calls, She felt the system should be refined and suggested discussing it at the next Council work session. Ma Paulson noted that, out of nine calls, two were questions. He agreed with the suggestion to discuss the issue further at the next work session. Councilmember Rosene agreed the issue could be discussed at work session. He then withdrew the earlier motion. Mayor Paulson instructed the issue of the call -in line be added to the work session agenda and the next City Council agenda 11/14/94 -14- ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Rusene and seconded by Couneilmember Mann to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 8:28 p.m. ' Deputy City Clerk Todd Paulson, Mayor Recorded and transcribed by: Barb Collman ThneSaver Off Site Secretarial 11114/94 - 15 - MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIAL WORK SESSION NOVEMBER 21, 1994 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in special work session and was called to order by Mayor Todd Paulson at 7a03 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Todd Paulson and Councilmembers Dave Rosene and Kristen Mann. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Finance Director Charlie Hansen, and Council Secretary Barbara Collman, Councilmembers Barb Kalligher and Celia Scott were excused from this evening's meeting. Also in attendance were Financial Commission Chair Donn Escher> Mayor -Elect Myrna N,xagness, and Councilmember -Elect Debra Hilstrom. CONTINUATION OF PROPOSED 1995 BU DGET The City Manager noted the date December 5 is available for a Council Work Session if needed. SPECIAL REQUEST TO APPROVE MOBILE DIGITAL TERMINALS (MDT) EQUIPMENT FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT The City Manager stated there is a request for action at this work session to be followed by formal consideration at the next Council meting, There was a brief discussion -of the current status of staffing in the police department as well as the cost and number of squad cars under budget consideration. The City Manager stated Staff needs a decision regarding the MDTs in order to notify the other communities cooperating in the project. The City Manager indicated his opinion was the MDTs would contn'bute more to the effectiveness of street officers than an additional police officer. 11/21/94 - 1 - The City Manager explained the purchase of ten MDTs would provide a unit for each of the marked squad cars. The preliminary budget has enough money for MU'1's as well as one officer, The start -up cost for the MDTs is $32,000, which would come from an appropriation of $23,000 currently in the 1994 budget plus other available funds. However, it would be futile to start the program in 1994 vrithout a budget commitment for 1995. The program will take a couple of months to be functional. The other communities involved have already committed to budgeting for both 1994 and 1995. Councilmember Mann asked whether there are future costs expected. The City Manager said there is an ongoing Ieasc cost for about three years. After that, the system would be owned outright and one -third to one -half of the annual cost would be dropped. He explained d pane the system operates by purchasing air time. The system is secure, however. There are enhanced features which could be added later at an additional cost. Councilmember Mann asked whether another dispatcher had been hired and whether the o institution f 0 the MDT system would mean another dispatcher would not be necessary, The City Manager said another dispatcher has not been hired and it is a possibility one would not be necessary. We are hopeful that MDTs would at least delay the need for an additional dispatcher. The NfDT system operates as a radio connection to both LQGIS and the county systems, bypassing the dispatcher. The officers themselves can access the computer system, County approval is needed but is expected. Councilmember Rosene encouraged other Councilmembers to observe the MDT system in action in Brooklyn Park, as he has. Chairman Escher noted the Financial Commission supports the MDT system but does not support the hiring of an additional officer and purchase of another squad car. Councilmember Mann agreed since a policeman has not been hired this program would be a good alternative. Councilmember Rosene. also expressed support for the MDT system. Mayor Paulson noted it is not necessary for the Council to choose between the MDTs and an officer. The City Manager agreed and noted Staff needs an answer so it can let the other three cooperating communities know. Following discussion, it was decided a commitment to the MDTs would not, in actuality, affect either 1994 or 1995 budgets. Mayor Paulson stated he supports the program since it does not require an increase in the proposed budget. 11/21/94 -2- The City Manager explained the MDT system would make the Police Department more effective. In many cases, police officers do not check licenses in an effort to not overload the dispatchers. After the system has been in effect for a year, its effect will be known and P a decision can be made concerning dispatchers. Other eommunitic s using thG sy stom h a ve noticed measurable effects. � Councilmember Rosene noted the system has memory capability which c could provide vital information in certain situations. Using the usual dispatcher service, it could take five to ten minutes for an officer to obtain a driver's license check and a motor vehicle check since it is possible a dispatcher would not be available. With the MDT system, the information would be available in much less time. Also, police officers would have the capability of communicating car to car without monitoring. Another safety feature is that if an officer logs onto the system but doesn't follow up there is an alert, The total 1995 cost for the MDT lease would be $45,000, and the total annual cost for acquiring a new police officer would be $55,004. The City Manager asked Council to consider a motion which would be followed by formal confirmation at the next Council meeting. There was a motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Rosene to approve the purchase of MOT equipment for the Police Department and place a confirming resolution on the next Council agenda. A citizen in the audience, Joe Noonan, asked the Council for justification of the expenditure. He asked several questions regarding the payback and whether the Council had the neccssary background on which to base a decision on this issue. He suggested the MDT system might only be desirable because it is state of the art. Mr. Noonan also stated he had been a caller on the phone -in line during the last City Council meeting. He felt callers should not have to give their names, although he would have if he had been asked his name. He said he is a homeowner and business owner concerned with property values and the image of the city and has no hidden motives. The City Manager explained the figures justifying the expenditure had been presented at an earlier stage of consideration of the system and the information presented this evening wasn't intended to provide for the initial justification which was mad 12 months ago with the 1994 budget. If Council wished he would resurrect the initial 1994 budget justification. Councilmember Rosene stated Council does have the background needed to evaluate the expenditure. HG said he had seen a demonstration of an MDT in use and described a feature where the characteristics of the owner of the vehicle were provided so the officer could compare the drivcr of the vehicle to the owner. Such a feature could be valuable to stave off certain crimes. 11121/94 -3- The City Manager mentioned this system is used all over the United States and is a proven system. The MDTs can connect with the county computer system, other cities' computer systems, and Brooklyn Center's computer system, He added the four cooperating communities had evaluated five similar systems before selecting the recommended MDT system. The motion passed unanimously. The City Manager noted a corresponding resolution would he presentcd at the next City Council meeting. REVIEW OF BUDGET BEGINNING WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT BUDGET Councilmember Mann asked how much of the police department budget goes to the canine unit. The City Manager answered the costs are in the officer's salary and maintenance of the animal, The City Manager noted the canine officer has been out over eight months with an injury and may not be back to work at all. The new Police Chief will need to decide the fate of the unit. Councilmember Rosene said it would be nice to have figures showing the success rate of the canine program. He noted the system is fallible if there is only one qualified officer and he is injured and unable to work. Tho City Manager mentioned he. had personally not recommended the canine m from the begi r. E h r noted the Financial e ro a o e M sc e p � Commission had not recommended the program either. Councilmember Rosene questioned whether the program could be cut from the budget. The cost of the program was estimated to be betwcon $3,300 and $10,444 beyond the officer's pay. The City Manager said Staff could ask the police department if they would like to make a recommendation on the issue. He noted the program has not had good luck because of a history of illness and injury to the officers and their dogs. Councilmember Rosene indicated he would like to hear the police department's comments concerning the canine unit. Councilmember Mann added the police department should state the effects of the program. I There was a discussion concerning the inclusion of costs for additional officers and provisional officers in the budget. Mr. Escher presented - a graph detailing the growth in real estate taxes. He also noted the Financial Commission questions the need for an additional officer, with the associated costs. He stated it i5 not necessarily true that adding a police officer will solve a crime rate problem. Crime rates have actually gone down, so the statistics do not demonstrate a need for another officer. Society calls for more manpower but the Council should not react to 11/21/94 -4- political pressures. Rather, they should rely on facts and figures in deciding the issue. He also recommended the City get out of the dispatch business. Councilmember Rosene stated he had supported the addition of another officer because often the force is sh fit e n minimum number. Hi o ce tan o ffice r or mor and is operating o a her g staffing levels are necessary to enforce existing laws more consistently. Mr. Escher noted the concern of the Financial Commission is with the principle that tax rates affect the City's public image. He urged the Council to look at the overall picture of budget distnbudon. Councilmember Mann stated the City will eventually need to go with the county for dispatch services. She inquired whether the problems had been resolved in order to use the county for fire dispatch. The City Manager said a local dispatch system is still preferable for fire calls, The Finance Director said some glitches were resolved with using the county system, but not all were worked out, The City Manager stated there will be an evaluation made of the other communities using the dispatch system but they haven't been operational for a long enough period yet to evaluate. CouncBmember Mann said she supports using the county system. Councilmember Rosene said part of the reason Council had chosen not to go with the county system was the MDT syster° ?s proven and safe He had worried about the, fees being inflated but is more comfortabr� in supporting the county system now as he trusts Fat McGowan. He noted a glitch with the fire system was the inability to communicate truck -to- truck, He wondered if Staff should investigate MDTs for fire trucks. The City Manager said his impression was MDTs in fire trucks would not be an advantage when using the county system. Mayor Paulson asked where the increase of five to six million came from. He wondered whether it was from property to -es with a zero percent increase The Finance Director noted the amount had to be made up from 1993 to 1594, The City Manager noted the City is not spending more j ust twdn tY g ty ) p g g more. Mr. Escher commented the policymakers need to consider whether the City can continue to "do it all." 11/21/94 -5 - Mayor Paulson said that question will be addressed, but public safety is a priority. Adding more officers and using them for preventative measures has lowered the crime rate. Mr. Escher mentioned the City has been free of bonding and using bonding will add a burden. He noted the Financial Commission did not claim to have the answer to the issue. The City Manager noted the figure of $100,000 includes the code enforcement officer, sixth squad car, the patrol officer, and the school liaison officer. He had recommended the sixth vehicle not be added, Councilmember Rosene said if the City Manager does not believe a sixth car is necessary, he. would agree. It would mean a deletion of $20,000 from the budget. There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Mann to delete the sixth squad car for the police department from the budget. Councilmember Mann questioned how much could be taken off the budget if the addition of an officer was deleted. She was told that action would save a total of approximately $50,000 to $55,000. Councilmember Mann stated effective utilization of officers should be studied, A line has to be drawn somewhere and the City has been getting by even with officer positions unfilled. Councilmember Rosene said the officers must be producing well but they may be experiencing stress. Councilmember Mann noted the police officers have a union watching out for them on that issue. Councilmember Mann commented adding additional officers would not reduce overtime. The City Manager agreed, noting overtime is necessary because of court time and other circumstances such as an arrest which occurs right at the time of a shift change. Councilmember Rosene said some overtime could be eliminated since some is due to ofticcrs working extra shifts. Mayor Paulson noted the officers need to take the vacations they have earned. Councilmember Rosene stated officers are needed to fill the new programs which have been established, Also, if they have a lower number of calls to answer they can have time to stay un tt)p yr i„%;idcjrts whi;.h oft= slip by unnoticed. There was a discussion with Mr. Noonan concerning prudent use of money, management and utilization of employees, and making choices, Mr. Escher recommended the Council research the overtime situation carefully. 11/1194 -6- The City Manager noted overtime was cut back 20 percent two years ago. He said an evaluation can be performed. A time clock is used and overtime is monitored by a captain and a field su pervisor. There was more discussion regarding overtime by police officers. It was mentioned three percent of the total police budget goes to overtime pay. The budget allows for 100 hours per year per officer in overtime. Councilmember Mann suggested Council meet December 5 to complete the budget review. Mr. Noonan stated the City should drop out of the retail liquor business. The City Manager and the Finance Director said if the City followed that suggestion it would then have to raise taxes, and the revenue from the liquor stores is $100,000 per year and there is no other source of revenue to equal that amount, The liquor stores are self- supporting and provide a profit to the City, There were further comments from Mr. Noonan concerning what he considers superfluous involvements (i.e. the golf courses, the liquor stores, the recreation center). It was decided to defer the remaining agenda items to December 5, 1994, work session. DISCUSSION OF COUNCIL MEETING CALL -IN PROGRA141 Councilmember. Mann expressed concern that it might be necessary t reconsider a decision already finalized and the caller might not have even been a citizen of Brooklyn Center. ZNfavor Paulson felt the trial call -in had gone well. He thought there should be another trial in order to have enough information to reach a decision. He noted there was not a necessity to revisit a closed issue, so maybe that apprehension could be put to rest. Councilmember Mann inquired as to the cost of the trial. The Finance Director estimated $35 .00 . Councilmember Mann felt $35.00 was reasonable. She stated enough information is not provided through just publishing the agenda, The citizens need access to more complete information. Shc said she would agree to another trial of the call -in program. There was a motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Rosene to authorize another trial of the call -in line at the next Council meeting. The motion pussud unanimously. Mr. Noonan commented he liked the call -in line as it was convenient. He said the callers v � in questioned. Every n im.dated b be should not be i t � g q opinion should be respected. I 11/21/94 -7- ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmemher Mann to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Deputy City Clerk Todd Paulson, Mayor Recorded and transcribed by: Barbara Collman TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial I 11/21/94 -8 - MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI'T'Y OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION NOVEMBER 28, 1994 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Todd Paulson at 7:04 p.m, ROLL CALL Mayor Todd Paulson, Cour_eilmembers Celia Scott, Dave Rosene, and Kristen Mann, Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public Services Diane Spector, Planning and Zoning Specialist Ron Warren, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Council Secretary Carla Wirth. Councilmember Barb Kalligher was excused from tonight's meeting, OPENING CEREMONIES Ulysses Boyd uffcrcd the invocation. OPEN FORUM Mayor Paulson noted the Council had received one request to use the open forum session this evening from Jim Peppe to address agenda item No. Ili concerning the proposed amendment to the 1994 General Fund budget to Provide Funding for a Special Election. He inquired if Council was willing to allow Mr. Peppe to address this matter under Open Forum. Jim Peppe stated he is a Brooklyn Park resident and appreciates the opportunity to address this matter during Open 3- *arum. He indicated his concern that the residc.nts of Brooklyn Center are being asked to fund $10,500 to fill Bill Lilther's State Senate seat throligh a special election. He asserted Senator Luther was absent from Brooklyn Centcr for several years, raised $1 million during his campaign, and should be required to pay for this special election himself. Councilmember Rosene advised the Council's rules of Open Forum restrict political speeches. Mr. Peppe stated he is interested in the taxpayers of Brooklyn Center where taxes are "going through the roof' and now taxpayers are expected to pay for a special election that could have been avoided if Senator Luther had resigned his seat prior to running for Congress. 11%28/94 - 1 - Mayor Paulson noted he and Mr. Peppe are candidates for Luther's Senate seat. He added the Council will have to consider what is in the public's best interest. Mr. Peppe requested the Council consider passing this additional cost onto Mr. Luther since he made it necessary and should be held responsible, Dan Remiarz, Brooklyn Center resident, commented on a newspaper article he read several weeks ago regarding the City Manager's recommendation the Police Chief be selected from within the ranks. He expressed concern with this recommendation, asserted this process is not always successful, and requested the Council reevaluate what is in the best interest of the City's residents. Mr. Rerniarz commented in an Army platoon, a vote of no confidence of the platoon commander would be considered mutinous and court marshalled and now the Council is considering promoting "one of them ". Councilmember Rosene asked Mr. Remiarz if he was implying one of the Police Ca ptains P were part of the vote of no confidence. Mr. Remiarz stated this is what was reported in the newspaper. Councilmember Rosene clarified the Police Captains are not part of the Police Union who made that vote. :Mayor Paulson asked if there was anyone else present who wished to address the Council. There being none, he continued with the regular agenda items. COUNCIL REPORTS There were no Council Reports. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT. ENDA Mayor Paulson inquired if any Councilmember requested any items be removed from the consent agenda. The City Manager requested Agenda Item Ilk, Resolution Accepting Bid and Awarding Contracts for Improvement Project No. 1993 -18, Contract 1994 -Q, Residential Structure Removal (Park cat. Ride /Storm Pond Site) be added to the agenda. Councilmember Mann requested Agenda Item Ili be removed. Co=c.il agreed to remove Agenda Item 8a from the agenda since a full Council is not present. There was a motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve the Novemb r 28 1994 agenda and consent agenda as amended. The motion AA e g a passed unanimously. 11/28194 -2- RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION NO. 94 -247 Member I{risten Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING GIFT FROM THE BROOKLYN CENTER WOMEN'S CLUB FOR THE AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 94-248 Iblember Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESO ?_`JTION ACKNOWLEDGING THE 1994 HERITAGE FESTIVAL AS AN EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY CELEBRATION The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -249 Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING DEVELOPMENT OF AN RFP FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1995 -05, 69TH AVENUE SHINGLE CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, AND ROADWAY AND WATERNLAIN IMPROVEMENT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 94- Member Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AMENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVY ROLL NO. 13132 TO PROVIDE FOR THE AWARD OF ASSESSMENT STABILIZATION GRANTS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. 11/28/94 -3- SOLUTION NO, 94-25 lylcmbcr Kristen Mann introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION DECLARING SURPLUS PROPERTY The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passcd unanimously. RESOLUTION NO, 94 -252 Mcmber Kristen Mann introduced the following resolutions and nmoyed it, aduptiun: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TO JOIN THE L0015 M013ILL DIGITAL TERMINAL GROUP AND PROVIDE FOR THE FINANCING THEREOF The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. LICENSES There was a motion by Couneilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Scott to apprgve the following list of licenses: AMUSEMENT DEVICES - OPERATOR Ithaca Restaurant, Inc. 1501 Freeway Blvd MECHANICAL SYSTEMS NewMech Companies, Inc. 1633 Eustis Street RENTAL DWELLINGS Initial: Kwi- HaWong 1513 Humboldt Place Kwi- HaWong 1549 Humboldt Place The motion passed unanimously. MAYORAL APPOINTMEI"T TWh V LAKE USE TASK FORCE The City Manager advised the City has received three excellent applications for the TNvin Lake Use Task Force, iviavor Paulson stated he would like to appoint William Siems as the At-large Representative PP g P and Dorothea Allen as the Lake Resident member. He explained the other applicant, 11/28/94 -4- Graydon Boeck, has served on the Water & Resources Commission, and he would like to appoint Dorothea Allen as a way of giving another resident an opportunity to serve the City. Councilmember Mann concurred all applicants would be excellent. She thanked Mr. Boeck for making application and suggested he consider applying for the Watershed Commission. Councilmember Rosene agreed and extended his appreciation to Mr. Boeck. There was a motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Scott to affirm Mayor Paulsofs appointment of Dorothea Allen and William Siems to the Twin Lake Use Task Force. The motion passed unanimously. ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER CITY CHARTER Since a full Council was not present, the City Manager recommended consideration of this ordinance be tabled to the December 19, 1994, Council meeting. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Mann to table further consideration of An Ordinance Amending Chapter 2 of the Brooklyn Ccntcr City Charter to the December 19, 1994, Council meeting. The motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 94014 The City Manager presented Planning Commission Application No. 94014 submitted by Country Harvest Buffet Management, Inc, requw sting rezoning and site and building plan approval for a Commer4 e Planned Unit Development involving a 10,000 square foot, 400 seat restaurant at the northwest quadrant of Freeway Boulevard and Shingle Creek Parkway. The Plannin and Zoning Specialist presented the staff report and advised the Planning Commission unanimously recommend approval subject to conditions as outlined in its Resolution No. 94 -2. Councilmember Scott asked if this application will require an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning and Zoning Specialist stated it will not because the Plan acknowledges this area for Light Industrial, Commerce, and Service /Office uses which is consistent with the proposed development. Councilmember Scott expressed concern regarding traffic circulation laid questioned what can be done to encourage traffic to use the Parkway Circle entrance and discourage use of the Freeway Boulevard access. 11r8/94 - s - The Planning and Zoning Specialist advised full access is desirable as well as locating access as close to the Chi -Chi's access alignment as possible. He pointed out there will be no access along Shingle Creek Parkway so the only access on the north will be Parkway Circle. Councilmember Scott noted traffic is always backed up in this location and traffic coming from the east and south may not know the access to the north even exists. The Planning and Zoning Specialist explained an on -site free standing directional sign could be erected at both access points and there could be a directional sign at the corner of Parkway Circle and Shingle Creek Parkway if they were needed. Mike Atkins, representative for Country Harvest Buffet Management, Inc., reviewed the floor plan layout noting the location of the cashier, and areas for seating, and food preparation. Mayor Paulson opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 94014 submitted by Country Harvest Buffet Managunicia, I ic:. requesting rezoning and site and building plan approval at 7:50 p.m. He inquired if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council. Cliff Hill, 7037 Humboldt Avenue, stated he felt this site is located too close to Chi -Chi's and expressed concern the proposed Country Harvest Buffet would create unfair competition, In response to Councilmember Scott's question, the Planning and Zoning Specialist advised Chi -Chi's had been notified of the Planning Commission and Council consideration. No one else appeared to address the public hearing. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Rosene to close the public hearing at 7:52 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. In response to Mr. Hill's concern, Councilmember Rosene commented the Council does not want to do a disservice to Chi -Chi'$ and he feels these two restaurants cater to different taste. He commented the proposed Country Harvest Buffet will be of benefit to residents and draw consumers from a larger area. He added this restaurant may attract people who notice Chi -Chi's and patronize them as well. Mayor Paulson commented people have property rights and the Council cannot "set" the market. He stated he has been looking forward to having this property developed and feels it )NU be a benefit. 111'28i94 - 6 - The City Manager presented a Resolution Regarding the Disposition of Planning Commission Application No. 94014 Submitted by the Country Harvest Buffet Management, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -253 Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION REGARDING THE DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 94014 SUBMITTED BY COUNTRY t1ARVEST BUFFET MANAGEMENT, INC. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kristen Mann, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinance Regarding the "Zoning Classification of Certain Land. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Roscne to approve fiat reading of An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinance Regarding the Zoning Classification of Certain Land. The motion passed unanimously. DISCUSSION ITEMS: PHONE -IN LINE Mayor Paulson commented this is the second tweeting for having the call -in tcicphonc line available. Councilmember Roscne reminded the viewing audience this feature is only available during the live broadcast on Monday nights, not during the Tuesday rebroadcast. 1995 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE The City Manager advised it has been the Council's policy to accept the upcoming years meeting schedule. He noted the meetings have been scheduled to avoid holidays, and if a problem occurs the schedule can be modified. The City Manager noted the new members will be ceremoniously sworn in at the January 9, 1495, Council meeting. There was a motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Scott to accept the 1995 City Council meeting schedule as presented. The motion passed unanimously. 11128194 -7- HUMBOLDT AVENUE PROJECT - STATUS AND DIRECTION The City Manager explained the Council received the report of the Northeast Transportation Corridor Task Force on October 24, 1994, but did not take formal action to accept it which would also result in discharging the Task Force, The Director of Public Services reviewed staff's recommendation the Council formally accept the Task Force Report and discharge the Task Force, or send the report back to the Task Force for additional work. The Director of Public Services noted there is still a lack of consensus among the various parties as to which option should be implemented for the Humboldt Avenue improvement. The Task Force recommended a street improvement with reconstruction to a width of 36 feet to provide a two lane road with parking on one side, They felt on- street parking was an important characteristic of a neighborhood and eliminating parking would be counter to the goal of neighborhood preservation. An informal neighborhood poll taken by the Task Force indicated some felt parking was eery important while others felt it was not so important as to justify widening the road. Others felt parking was not necessary, The Director of Public Services pointed out this informal poll did not indicate a clear majority for either option. The Director of Public Services indicated staff de sires direction from the Council as to which option, if any, to pursue. She offered five options identified by staff as follows: 1. Do nothing. �. Construct a M foot moot to MSA standards with funding totally from state aid and local state aid funds (no special assessment). No parking would be allowed. It was noted if other funding were used, parking could be allowed. 3. Construct a 36 foot street with a straight alignment funded from state aid, local state aid, and special assessments. With a straight alignment the width of boulevard would be rcd on both sides by about three feet. With a curvilinear alignment the street would abut the. sidewalk in some areas, About 14 trees would be lost but parking ,would be allowed on one side. Special assessments would be included with this option so a public hearing would be required. 4. Construct a parkway which would cost an estimated $3.25 million, mostly for right -of- way acquisition. While this would be eligible for state aid, currently there are not adequate funds to cover this cost. 5. Some other option involving review and possible reassignment of state aid designations. The Director of Public Services explained adjusting the City's municipal state aid system should be handled in a de l," Oerative fashion to maintain the integrity of not only the City's system but also that of Brooklyn Park. Moving a designation which would make the sWstem discontinuous usually has financial consequences and may have an unintended effect of forcing Brooklyn Park to make a change in its system. 11/28194 -8 - The Director of Public Services commented on the current condition of paved surface and emphasized something needs to be done to improve Humboldt Avenue. Councilmember Mann questioned which side parking would be allowed if Humboldt Avenue is constructed to a 36 foot width. The Director of Public Services advised the consultant used input from neighborhood groups and recommended alternate parking based on what the neighborhood wants to see and where it would not impact trees and work well with cross streets. She added without a curvilinear design, it would be very difficult to consider alternating parking. Councilmember Mann asked if the majority of residents hadn't .indicated they wanted parking. The City Manager responded some indicated they did not need parking or wewt it because it would result in an assessment. The Director of Public Services added some residents wanted parking but not if it resulted in the need to widen Humboldt Avenue. Mayor Paulson questioned the details of the proposal submitted but denied for State Aid funding, The Director of Public Services explained the City had requested a vuriuricc from the Commissioner of Transportation to improve the roadway with a 26 foot and 32 foot design (with parking in areas of 32 foot width) with funding through MSA. However, the Commissioner's Variance Committee denied the variance request based on their finding the `vidth would not safely accommodate projected traffic on Humboldt Avenue. In response to Councilmember Rosene's question, the City Manager explained a curvilinear alignment would move within the right -of -way but the Humboldt Avenue right -of -way is so narrow it limits what can be done. Councilmember Rosene indicated support of a design which will break up the visual impact and induce the driver to slow down. The Director of Public Services advised there is not much room to work with considering the right -cat -way available, sidewalks on both sides, and alternating parking. Councilmember Rosene inquired regarding the Hensel driveway which is "trapped" between two stop signs. The City Manager stated if the Council decides to proceed, the consultant will specifically look at that situation to determine the best way to mitigate the problem. Councilmember Rosene indicated support for establishing a project and directing staff to prepare a resolution for consideration at the next Council meeting. He believed Option 2, the 34 foot street design, had some negative aspects (loss of parking) but mostly positive aspccts since it would not be wider than the current street, funded totally from MSA, and provide beautification with landscaping, curbs, and gutters installed. He stated he was reluctant to consider a 36 foot design since it would reduce the boulevard area. Councilmember Rosene commented the Council has discussed trying to reduce traffic but he slid not see any way to accomplish this short of something drastic (diverter, blockage). IIJU/94 -9- Councilmember Diann indicated she is also more comfortable with Option 2, construct a 30 foot street, and felt traffic would travel faster with a 36 foot street. She asked if more trees can be saved with a curvilinear alignment. The Director of Public Services indicated staff looked at a 30 foot wide curvilinear alignment and found it could be designed around and save most trees, but some could not be saved. She agreed more could be saved than with a 36 foot wide design. Councilmember Scott stated she supported Option 2, construct a 30 foot street, originally and still supports it. She noted the area is only a few blocks long and it is probably ijuL possible to have much of a curvilinear design that would be noticeable. She stated she does not support a wider design that would result in loss of trees and construct the roadway closer to houses. With regard to the "trapped" driveway, Councilnmember Scott asked if a turn- around area could be constructed so the residents would not have to back out into traffic. The. City Manager indicated this Option could be looked at for any of the properties with a similar problem. He explained if the Council decides to move forward, a construction meeting will be scheduled with residents to consider greater detail of these issues. Councilmember Scott commented the Council has held a public hearing, scheduled meetings, and held Humboldt Avenue residents in limbo for a year. She suggested this matter be decided tonight and not "pushed off' on the new Council. Councilmember Mann indicated support for constructing a turn- around and suggested it be made available for all property with the City defraying some of the cost. The City Manager stated the consultant can look at all properties with this problem as well as other options that may be available, Currently, the project has not been looked into at that level of detail. Mayor Paulson stated another option is to use the specifications submitted to Mn/DOT for the variance and consider reassignment of State Aid designations. He commented perhaps the City should wean itself from State Aid for Humboldt Avenue. He supported that design {cnmhination 26 foot and 32 foot wide design) and funding from another source. The Director of public Services informed the Council MSA funding totals approximately $800,000 per year, and this project is estimated to cost between $200,000 and $300,000. She advised there is no other segment in Brooklyn Center that would generate as much State Aid need and no other s gment meets MSA requirements that is not already designated except on short segment of 73rd Avenue, Councilmember Mann asked if the Humboldt Avenue MSA designation can be removed for a number of years and then redesignated after construction. The City Manager advised there would be no benefit, and if MSA funding cannot be used, there will be an assessment to property owners of over $3,000 per lot. 110,94 - 10- The Director of Public Services reviewed State Aid routes in this quadrant and explained Newton Avenue does not qualify for MSA designation since it is not a collector or arterial roadway. Councilmember Rosene expressed concern with a 32 foot design since property owners would have to be assessed and it would only be two feet wider. He supported a more narrow roadway (30 foot street) with no assessments. Mayor Paulson opened the meeting for residents- to provide input. Mike Schwartz state d th e concern s n h always been with the volume of traffic. He reviewed past action regarding Humboldt Avenue and the Task Force's recommendatiuil to address traffic control measures and the need to design a road to reduce traffic volume. He asserted with a "band aid" solution, traffic will continue to grow. Mayor Paulson asked if he would support a 30 foot wide street. Mr. Schwartz stated it would not reduce traffic which is what the problem has always been. He rested residents have to deal with limited access and pollution, Councilmember Rosene pointed out the 30 foot street design would place the street further from the homes and landscaping would help with the visual impact, possibly also with pollution. He stated he understands this does not reduce traffic, but it would not encourage an increase in traffic volume either. Mr. Schwartz stated he believed there would be no benefit with a 30 foot street design. Residents have a 30 font street now and to r4construct it the same width and remove parking would not add any value. Councii]member Rosene noted the design would incorporate curbs to prevent vehicles from "jumping" curbs, add landscaping, and bury power lines to improve aesthetics. Mr. Schwartz stated the power lines are not on his side of the roadway and he felt constructing a turn- around in his front yard would be absurd. He reiterated the problem is too many cars on Humboldt Avenue, Debbie Hensel, 1500 Amy Lane, stated her property is the one referred to previously with a "trapped" driveway. She does not believe constructing a turn- around is the best solution and expressed concern about children's safety while walking to school since sidewalks are in this same area. She agreed with Mr, Schwartz the problem is the volume of traffic and suggested the MSA designation be moved to 73rd Avenue. Their main priority is to Preserve the neighborhood and property values. Ms. Hensel suggested the City purchase her property and turn it into a parkway, but not to make them live with this situation any longer. She explained they have to take a "chance" every time they back out of their driveway onto Humboldt Avenue. She asked the Council 11/28/94 to deal with the traffic issue and provide some relief prior to reconstructing the roadway. She asserted removing the MSA designation on Humboldt Avenue will provide more freedom to construct a design that will hinder traffic. Councilmember Rosene questioned how the road could be redesigned to hinder traffic. Ms. Hensel stated diverters or rerouting traffic are all possibilities. She stated residents don't expect traffic to be totally blocked off but would like to see traffic volume reduced through use of features not a-,railable under MSA design standards. Councilmember Rosene stated he does not know of any other way to discourage traffic except to block it off and force traffic into different routes. The Director of Public Services advised one of the options staff reviewed was "chokers" and a system of diverters (median blockage at 73rd Avenue). All involved physical restrictions to force traffic onto other routes. Ms. Hensel stated while she would like the stop sign at 72nd Avenue removed, she would like traffic reduced even more, and removing that stop sign would not reduce traffic. Manor Paulson asked staff if a 30 foot street design would provide any reduction in traffic. The City Manager responded a 30 foot street design with a curvilinear alignment would not add to nor divert traffic. The Director of Public Services reported while probably not directly attributable to installation of the stop signs, traffic volume on Humboldt Avenue has reduced 107o to 15% while Dupont Avenue has experienced a 50% increase, and Newton and 73rd Avenues have also experienced a large increase. She explained it appears traffic has fanned out into other neighborhoods, Councilmember Rosene stated he lives on Fremont Avenue and has noticed an increase in traffic volume, Mr. Schwartz stared it is not good enough to keep traffic off Humboldt Avenue but to also keep it out of other neighborhoods too and get it back on Highway 252. He encouraged the Council to take action now, before traffic volume reaches top capacity on every road. He pointed out Highway 610 will be completed and the Council needs to encourage mass transit to find another route or traffic will go through neighborhoods. Councilmember Scott commented on the frustration experienced by the Council in trying to reduc., traffic when Brookl yn Park has indicated they are not interested in blocking off 73rd Avenue. She commented the Council has no control over traffic coming from the north and must impress on Mn/DOT the need to address traffic flow on Highway 252. She suggested the Council contact legislators who can talk with M 34VOT; however, in the mean time Humboldt Avenue is falling apart and something needs to be done. 11/28/94 i Ma Mayor Paulson asked if the Task Force report had been accepted. Th e Cit ana $ it be formally advised it had not and suggeste Y acted on which will also dissolve the Task Forcc. r Cott and seconded b Councilmember Rosene to was a motion b Councilmembe S Y The e y accept the Northeast Transportation Corridor Task Force report and direct staff to pursue Option 2, constructing a 30 foot street, funded totally from State Aid and local State Aid � fines , assessments, with the proj including no parking, burying power 1 no s ecial assess 7 8 funds, p P landscap and curb and utters and to also direct staff to continue to work with Mn/ll0T P g, g funnel traffic on Hig a to � Y 252. Councilmember Rosene commented even though the 30 foot street design does not discourage traffic it will not encourage traffic either and still provided ne eded improvements. He stated he does not pretend this is a good solution, but he felt it was the least bad solution. Mayor Paulson declared a recess at 8:51 p.m. 71-v meeting was reconvened at 9:05 p.m. Councilmember Rosenc noted higher than normal curb heights had been discussed to eliminate cars using the boulevard as a passing lane. He suggested this option be included in the road design, but not be so high they cause conflict with opening car doors. Councilmember Scott agreed. Mayor Paulson stated he has always felt the Council needs to do something to reduce traffic and preserve this neighborhood and he is not convinced the motion to construct a 30 foot street `will do that. He agreed it is one of the lea::t objectionable options but until the traffic volume issue is addressed it will continue to divide the neighborhood and City into quadrants. He believed the Council needed to do something to reduce traffic on Humboldt Avenue or accommodate the traffic on Highway 252. He stated while he respects other Coumcilmember's opinions, this has been the 'bottom line" for him. Vote: three ayes, one nay. Motion carried. Mayor Paulson voted nay. Councilmember Scott indicated support of a resolution that the Council and staff continue to work with the City of Brooklyn Park and Mn/DOT to determine a reasonable solution to reduce the amount of traffic being funnelled off Highway 252 onto residential streets. She su options may include retuning signals on Highway 252. She also supported notifying the City's legislators that Mn/DOT has not been responsive to the City's concern . Mayor Paulson concurred and advised the Task Force found the access from Highway 252 onto Humboldt Avenue was the biggest .issue and during rush hour, traffic from the north takes this shortcut to save Several minutes. 1 13- Councilmember Rosene added making Humboldt Avenue a high priority for police enforcement will also help. The City Manager stated staff will proceed to work with Option 2 and involve residents to receive input on the e dcsi which will b P � e considered by the Council after the first of the year for final design approval. Duane Hensel, 1500 Amy Lane, stated Humboldt Avenue residents will not like what the Council is planning and will not tolerate a p roject that is under b p � c onstruction from the spring of 1995 to the spring of 1996. He requested the project contract include a heavy penalty for every day the project extends beyond the deadline. STAFF REPORT RE: SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT 'AN THE ASS ESSMENT S MENT S TAjI.LIZATIQN PROGRAM The City Manager advised the Council, at its September 19, 1994, work session, reviewed the City's policy for special assessments for street construction and expressed a need to review the City's oli re garding financi of storm drain imp rovements r ° P c} '; g g g related to street i mprovements ti ro ements and h p t G Assessment stabilization Program. The Director of Public Services explained Council has a xP Storm essed some concern the P drainage Utili F und g ty un rates are increasin g faster than a nticipated and reaching a maximum comfort level and without continuing to increase rates the Fund will not adequately finance all needed irn r s, p t. Also, some property owners were assessed the full cost of storm sewer construction when their storm sewers were installed 25 to 30 years ago, et the current i 7 g �Y policy is new installations are paid entirely by the Fund, which is unfair to those- property owners who paid their fair share. The Director of Public Services advised the Public Services Coordinator reviewed the storm drainage improvement financing policies of sever area cities and found each have a slightly diiterent approach. She recommended the follcwing policy: 1. For basic repair and maintenance to existing systems, or minor upgrades, the Storm Drainage Utility shall y the e ntir e � ty p ay e G t G c ost. 2. For construction of new storm sewer facilities, or substantial upgrades of existing facilities the b n fi i c c tt n property owners shall pay 40 percent of the total cost and the Storm Drainage Utility 60 percent. 3. For regional facilities, a hydrologic analysis shall be conducted which evaluates subwarershed b n tlr a nd o e e , a the City En 'Weer shall recommend app ropriate ty � app op ate financm Th e City Council shall determine on a case by case basis the appropriate cost sharing between the property owners of the benefittinng subwatershed and the Storm Drainage Utility, 11I28i94 -14- Councilmember Scott questioned funding should there be a major break in the storm sewer system. The Director of Public Services responded tied emer en o p emergency repairs would be paid for through the Storm Drainage Utility. t . The Director of Public Services reviewed the nd' fu mg outcome based on the approach being recommended by staff. In the Northwest Ar ;a, the additional special assessment pre property for storm sewer would have been ee about $700 -$800, and in the James/Knox area about $500. This compares to $600 - $ 1,000, the cost other properties in the City were assessed when storm sewer was constructed in their areas, updated for inflation. This is very consistent with the way it used to be done and less than charged in the mid- 1960's when originally installed. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Rosene to instruct staff to prepare modifications to the Special Assessment Policy for storm drainage improvements as outlined. The motion passed unanimously. The Director of Public Services then addressed the Assessment Stabilization Program by reporting the Council made $7 Assessment Stabilization grants in the James/Knox and Northwest Areas. Of the total 188 properties assessed, 31 percent of the property owners received some financial assistance. She advised while this has been an overwhelmingly positively received program, as currently established it is very expensive. The first half year program costs are over $65,000, which is in line with staffs estimate for a full year's program cost. Also, no permanent source of funding was established for this program. Currently it is funded from Local State Aid but this source of funds is also used to pay for sidewalk and trail improvements, amenities such as underground power, landscaping, and miscellaneous projects. This fund is not capable of supporting both the Assessment Stabilization Program and other improvement demands, The Director of Public Services recommended the Council reconsider the philosophy behind this Program and restructure it so most prorc;ty owners contribute at least a minimum amount. She then reviewed her rycommenda.tion as outlined in her staff report and suggested staff be directed to prepare an amendment. Councilmember Mann questioned impact on the Senior ro ram. The City Manager p g ty n ger clarified the Senior program is a deferral program which defers the assessment until the property changes hands but the assess b z meet accrues interest while it is deferred. Councilmember Mann stated her support for providing some break but perhaps not funding the entire assessment. She commented owning a house is a right, not a privilege and. some responsi'aility comes from owning a house and property. In response to Councilmember Mann's question, the Director of Public Services explained State Statutes do not allow the City to defer street assessments. In this case, the assessment is being made but fundod from a different source than the property owner pa)Ing the 11/28/94 -15- assessment. She reviewed the limited circumstances under which a deferment can be made and curnmented on staffs ability to estimate eligible property owners based on currently available census data. Councilmember Scott stated she believes staffs recommendation is going in the right direction, but perhaps not far enough. She noted a single family home owner earning '21 ,000 er y ear should be able to a m 4 t owa r ds and p y p ay ore than $ . 44 tow assessment, and p oi nted out it is not fair to other taxpayers in Brooklyn Center to have to pay the majority of assessments under this scenario. The City Manager suggested staff be directed to calculate a more progressive curve line for thus program. Councilmember Scott reported she has talked with other communities about this program and they indicated it w as far too generous, especially considering how taxes in Brooklyn Center have increased. She indicated support for considering an Assessment Stabilization program that provides assistance to those who really need it but not those who can provide for themselves. The City Manager explained funding for this program comes from the rest of the community or the Local State Aid Fund. Because the information available when the program was established was too sketchy to base policy decisions, staff was requested to bring back results after one year for reconsideration and to makc some very valid adjustments. The Cit Attorney clarified the project e a ect costs are full levied against everyone and f or those �' 0 y p ] Y $ rY that qualify for this program, the assessment is reduced by funds from other sources. Council consensus was reached to direct staff to provide Council with additional data and a more progr essive curve line for gran; qualifications. PROCESS FOR SOLICITATION OF APPLICANTS FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE FOSITIQN OF COMMISSIONER ON THE SHINGLE CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION AND ON THE WEST MISSISSIPPI WAT ERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION Since farmer City Engineer Mark Maloney has resigned his position as Commissioner to the Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Management Commissions, the City Manager recommended staff be directed to publish notice of this vacancy for consideration at the December 19 4 e , 199 , Council meeting. Councilmember Mann requested the time the meeting is held (mid -day) also be included in the nonce, 11x8/94 - lb . There was a motion by Councilmembe: Scott and seconded by Councilmember Mann to dircct staff to publish a notice of vacancy to fill the position of Commissioner to the Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTIONS - CONTINUED The City Manager presented a Resolution Terminating Further Consideration of Special Assessments on Certain Properties, Improvement Project No. 1990 -10, 69th Avenue Reconstruction. The Director of Public Services explained on September 13, 1993, the Council received objections to assessments for the 69th.Avenue street project from some residential property owners west of the France Avenue water tower. Due to the uncertainty of the future use or redevelopment 'of the area, the Council chose to table consideration of the assessments. Last week, one of the former property owners contacted staff indicating he had been required to place an escrow at the time ho sold his property to pay off the special dssessmenzs. This property owner has requested the (. ouncil reconsider this issue so he can retrieve his money from the escrow if the decision is to not assess his property. The Director of Public Services explained the issue is what would be the most likely future use of these properties and whether it would be appropriate to assess the properties, The proposed assessment was based on the current R -3 zoning even though the property is used as single family at this time. It was noted these properties could be redeveloped in the future as commercial or some other use. If the Council desires to reconsider these assessments the public hearing will have to be. rcopened and property owners notified. Councilmember Scott commented it is only fair to the adjacent property owners to also assess these R -3 zoned properties. $ne pointed out they received some benefit and if sold for commercial use they would have been assessed even higher. She indicated support for establishing a date for the public hearing and certifying assessments on these propertics. Councilmember Mann concurred and added it is not fair to expect other taxpayers to cover this cost. In response to Councilmember Rosene's question, the Director of Public Services explained these properties are zoned R -3 and used as R -1. Council's policy in the past was to base the assessment on the zoning classification rather than use of the property. Councilmember Rosene stated while he wanted them to pay their fair share, perhaps the Council could Consider a reduction from the R -3 rate. lie questioned the precedent that would be established if assessments are reduced on these five R -3. properties and adjusted based on use rather than zoning. Ila8l94 - 17 - The City Manager recommended the Council remain consistent and consider assessments based on benefit to the property. He added not following the Assessment Policy results in mitigating and effectively amending that Policy. Councilmember Rosene asked if these residents were aware of what was happening. The City Manager responded a number of meetings were held at that time so residents were fully aware. They were also aware if they rezoned, is would have down graded the vale of the property. He reported residents had argued the assessment should not be based on zoning and they should be treated the same as other R -1 property because they had the same use. He reiterated to be consistent, the Council needs to assess according to the zoning of the property, not the use. The City Attorney advised the benefit to the property, not the individual, needs to be considered as well as enhancement in fair market value as a result of the assessment. That enhancement is not subjective to the use of the property. In this case, the property is probably under utilized according to the market and zoning. councilmember Rosene sated he does not want to see more apartments or high density residential but would support townhouses on these R -a properties. He added if these property owners want to rezone to R -1 he would support reducing the assessment to the R -1 rate, Councilmember Scott pointed out residents want these properties to remain R -3, as identified in the Comprehensive Plan, and because they are a buffer between the R -1 neighborhood and commercial along Brooklyn Boulevard. There was a motion by Councilmember Mann and seconded by Councilmember Scott to reconsider certifying assessments on certain properties for Improvement Project No. 1990 -10, 69th Avenue Reconstruction, and direct staff to establish a date to continue the public hearing and notify property owners. The motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Amending improvement Project No. 194-32, Interim City Hall Remodelling, Reducing Scope of Project, Authorizing Purchasing of Workstations, and Authorizing Development of Plans and Specifications and Adv„rtisement for Bids. The Director of Public Services advised staff is no longer recommending the original remodeling scope and are now considering basic remodeling and improved use of space Ndthin City Hall. She explained at this point in time, staff believes it would be better to focus resources to meet those needs. The Director of Public Services recommended the Council consider amending the scope of the remodelling project. She reviewed issues to be addressed which included replacement of existing office, furniture with ergonomically correct adjustable furniture. Shc advised the 18 - City has experienced an increasing number of injury reports caused by repetitive motion and needs to be proactive in providing safe, ergonomically correct working conditions. The Director of Public Services reviewed the project costs as established and amendments proposed which will reduce the cost from $915,425 to $440,000 by reducing the scope of remodeling, eliminating the Police addition and adding high density storage. Councilmember Scott asked if this scope requires compliance with Americans Disability Act (ADA) requirements. The City Manager advised this scope will not trigger these requirements. He added the proposal will allow more effective use of the space and to provide more efficient workspaces that address ergonomic issues. Councilmember Mann questioned the status of the 13 ergonomic workstations that were purchased. The City Manager responded portions, like the chairs, have been received but the entire units have not yet been delivered because they first had to complete the process of selecting units that met ergonomic standards. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -254 Member Cclia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adnption: RESOLUTION AMENDING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1994-32, INTERIM CITY HALL REMODELLING, REDUCING SCOPE OF PROJECT, AUTHORIZING PURCI-LASING OF WORKSTATIONS, AND AUTHORIZING DEVELOPMENT OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Dave Rosene, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presentyd a Resolution Amending the 1994 General Fund Budget to Provide Funding for a Special Election. He advised this is a requirement of State law and ordered by the Governor of Minnesota. He recommended the Council approve this resolution. Councilmember Mann stated her opposition to appropriating $10,500 for a special election to fill farmer Luther's Senate seat. She felt the special election could have been avoided if Luther had resigned his Senate seat prior to running for Congress. She supported sending word to the Legislature of the need to reform this type of campaign practice. Councilmember Rosene commented it is common practice and precedent established that when running for office you do not need to resign the office you currently hold. He pointed out there has been no public outcry regarding this matter and mentioned scvcral other cases whcrc special elections are being held. 11/28!94 - 19 - Councilmember Rosene pointed out it will be beneficial to have a Congressman from Brooklyn Center who is familiar with the area and knowledgeable about local issues. Councilmember Mann stated this is tax payer's money that should not have to be spent if politicians would be required to resign their current office when running fo a "higher" office. Mayor Paulson advised he will be abstaining from the vote on this issue since he is a candidate for the Senate sear, however, this is how democracy and a free elcclioli process works. He suggested if reform were to occur, it should begin at the federal level to address the full issue of mandates. Councilmember Mann supported preparing a resolution asking the Legislature to address campaign reform to avoid this kind of waste of taxpayer's money. Mayor Paulson stated he does not think this is too high a cost to assure free and open democratic elections. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -255 Iviembcr Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1994 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Dave Rose Vote: ncilmembers Mann nay aye, Scott, aye, Mayor Paulson, Rosene, Cou � Y Y' abstain. The motion passcd. The City Manager presented a Resolution Approving the Installation of an Ice Skating Rink 4 _ e Proposed ].99� General Fund Bud , - t Bellvue Park for the 1.94 95 Season Amending th ro � et a � g P Therefore. He advised this rink was removed due to a lack of use but now a number of residents have indicated renewed interest and requesting the rink be provided. The Parks and Recreation Commission recommend approval on a trial basis with staff monitoring usage based on ice conditions. Councilmember Mann indicated support and stated a petition with 53 signatures warrants consideration of their request. Councilmember Scott agreed and added there are a number of younger families with children in this neighborhood, Councilmember Rosene asked if these residents are also expecting a warming house. Councilmember Mann indicated they are not. I 11/28/94 -20- Xh.50LU*1'1QN NU, 94 -250 Member Celia Scutt introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF AN ICE SKATING RINK AT BELLVUE PARK FOR THE 1994 -95 SEASON, AMENDING THE PROPOSED 1995 GENERAL FUND BUDGET THEREFORE The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kristin Mann, and the motion passed unanimously, The City Manager presented a Resolution Amending Resolution No. 94 -237 Accepting Bid and Awarding Contracts for Improvement Project No. 1993-18, Contract 1994 -Q, Residential Structure Removal (Park & Ride /Stornn Pond Site), The City Manager advised an error was made by Otting House Movers in their bid form whereby they bid $4,500 for the purchase of 4006 65th Avenue N, not to demolish it. He recommended approval of their bid. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -257 Member Davc Roselle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION A- MENDING RESOLUTION NO. 94 -237 ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR IMPRQVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1993 -18 CONTRACT 1994 -Q, RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE REMOVAL (PARK & RIDE /STORM POND SITE) The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. COUNCIL ABSENTEE Councilmembcr Mann asked if the discussion of Council absenteeism need to be discussed at a closed session. The City Attorney advised while data of City employees is discussed in closed session, Councilmembors are not employees of the City as defined within the Employee Data Act. Therefore, the issue can be discussed at a work session or regular meeting. ADJOURNMENT There ti-, a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Rosene to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 14;27 p.m. Deputy City Clerk Todd Paulson, Mayor Recorded and transcribed by: Carla Wirth TimcSavcr Off Site Secretarial 11/28194 - 21 - MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIAL WORK SESSION DECEMBER 5 1 1994 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS ROLL CALL Mayor Todd Paulson and Councilmember Kristen Mann. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Finance Director Charlie Hansen, Mayor -Elect Myrna Kragness, Financial Commission Chair Donn Escher, and Council Secretary Barbara Collman, CounciImembers Barb Kalligher, Dave Rosene, and Celia Scott were excused from tonight's meeting. As there was not a quorum present, the meeting was not officially called to order and those in attendance dismissed at 7;08 p.m. Deputy City Clerk Todd Paulson, Mayor Recorded and transcribed by: Barbara Collman TimeSavcr Off Site Secretarial 12/5/94 1 - MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TRUTH-IN-TAXATION BUDGET HEARING DECEMBER 7 1994 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER Thd Brooklyn Center City Council met in special session and was called to order by Acting Mayor protem Celia Scott at 7:42 p.m. ROLL CALL Councilmembers Celia Scott and Kristen Mann. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Finance Director Charlie Hansen, and Council Secretary Barbara Collman, Councilmembers Dave Rosene and Barb Kalligher were excused from tonight's meeting. Mayor Todd Paulson arrived at 7:25 p.m. TRUTH -IN- TAXATION HEARING The City Manager explained the purpose of the., hearing was the presentation of the 1995 proposed budget for public comment. The hearing is mandated by State law and public notices wore served in advance. The hearing will be continued December 14, 1994, The City Council is prohibited from acting on the budget at the hearing sessions, but must act by December 20, 1994. The City Manager outlined the process by which the budget has been brought to this point, The steps toward establishment of the budget began in April 1994. The preliminary budget was adopted September 12, 1994. The Ciry Manager noted the reason for the variation in tax bills on homes of identical value is their relationship to four separate school districts -- District 286 in the southeast area, District 281 in the southwest area, District 279 in the northwest area, and District 11 in the northeast area. The typical value of a home in Brooklyn Center is $73,000. The typical tax is $1,118, which is allocated as: $552 to the school district, $273 to Hennepin County, $227 to the City of Brooklyn Center, and $51 to separate service districts. 12/7/94 - 1 - The amount of tax to the City of Brooklyn Center amounts to $.20 per tax dollar. The city services purchased with that allocation are: public safety, public works, recreation, general government, economic development, and debt retirement. The Finance Director presented the proposed 1995 budget for the City of Brooklyn Center and purposes for the tax increase.. The budget allows for a 5.1 percent increase in spending. The property tax increase is due to budget growth, stagnant other revenues, and tax base decline. Budget growth is specifically attributable to equipment replacement and purchase, inflation, additional personnel, mobile data terminal$, and a levy increase for debt service on bonds. The City Manager noted the City receives only $.20 of every tax dollar, amounting to $19.00 per month for City services per household. There were no questions from the Council. The public was invited to participate in the hearing with questions and comments, Muriel Karlsgett, a resident of over 40 years, asked a question regarding recreation fees. She inquired why the fees are so high and how much the recreation programs and facilities are actually used by residents of Brooklyn Center. She asked whether non- resident users of the recreation facilities could be charged. The City Manager answered that almost all direct costs of the recreation program are rccuvcrcd by fees and some are subsidized. He offered to provide, by mail, a breakdown of percentages of fees. In the future, there is a Flan to also allocate the indirect costs. Non - residents are charged higher fees, Ms. Karlsgett asked what is being done to recover amounts outstanding in uncollected taxes. The City Manager noted the reason for raising taxes two to three perccnt is some businesses have appealed tax assessments and been given ;abatements, A few years is needed before a rQ erty °C'►s t o forfeiture. The n P county i vigorously P , e ty s opposing the appeals which lead to this situation. Councilmember Scott noted the county and school districts are adversely affected by the uncollected tax situation, Mayor Paulson arrived at 7:25 p.m. Dan Remiar?, 6201 June Avenue North, a resident of over 31 years, addressed the Council. He questioned the percentage of 10.96, believing it should have been rounded to 11 percent. The Finance Director noted he had chosen to use decimals rather than rounding the figure. 12/7/9=1 _ 2 _ Mr. Remiarz asked what the impact of the lawsuit involving the City Manager and the Chief of Police was on the budget. The City Manager explained the matter was handled through the insurance company and there was no impact to the 1995 budget. Mr. Remiara stated the city employees should be notified that he will be carrying video cameras. He also expressed the belief the polico union holds too much power, resulting in 10.4 weeks off work per year. He was appalled at City employees receiving sick leave of one day per month, cumulative. He asked the Council to take action and suggested a professional negotiator be hired to handle contracts with the union. It was noted the hearing would be continued on December 14, 1994, and City Staff and Councilmembers would be available to the public following tonight's session, ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Mann and sccondcd by Councilmembcr Scott to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously, The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 7:29 p.m. Deputy City Clerk Todd Paulson, Mayor Recorded and transcribed by: Barbara Collman Ti,neSavcr Off Site Secretarial 12, - 3, Council Meeting Date 12/19194 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Numbe _ 3 Request For Council Consideration Item Description: An Ordinance Amending Chapter 2 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter Department Approval: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manage Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: If all Councilmembers are not present, this item should be tabled to January 9, 1995, City Council meeting. If all Councilmembers are present, it is recommended the City Council remove this item from the Consent Agenda and open the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing, take any comments relative to the ordinance amendment, and then close the public hearing. It is further recommended to pass final reading of An Ordinance Amending Chapter 2 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached Yes ) This ordinance amendment was first read on September 12, 1994, and the City Council tabled it requesting further review by the Charter Commission and City Attorney. On October 24, 1994, the City Council approved first reading of the ordinance amendment with the recommended changes made by the City Attorney and Charter Commission. A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the City's official newspaper, and the public hearing was opened on November 14, 1994, and tabled to November 28, 1994. Since all Councilmembers were not present at the November 28, 1994, meeting, the ordinance amendment was tabled to this evening's meeting, December 19, 1994. The Charter Commission met on November 16, 1994, and discussed the minor amendments recommended by the City Attorney. It is the recommendation of the Charter Commission to approve second reading of An Ordinance Amending Chapter 2 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter with the minor amendments as recommended by the City Attorney. The Charter Commission also approved one further clarification to the last sentence of Section 2.05 to read "without following the procedures set forth in Section 2.05b." Attached for your review is a copy of the letter from City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, Holmes & Graven, to City Manager Gerald Splinter specifically listing the recommended minor amendments to the ordinance amendment. HOLMES & GRAVEN CHARTERED Attorneys at Law 470 Pillsbury Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 337 -9300 ROBERT C. LONG ' - A. ALSOP LAURA K. MOLLET aLD H. BATTY Facsimile (612) 337 -9310 BARBARA L. PORTWOOD .'HE' J. BUD JAMES M. STROMMEN JOHN B. DEAN JAMES J. THOMSON, JR. G. DOBBINS LARRY M. WERTHEIM MARY MARY N. BINS BONNIE L. WILKINS GARY P. WINTER CORRINE A. HEINE WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL JAMES S. HOLMES (612) 337.9215 DAVID L. GRAVEN (1929.1991) DAVID J. KENNEDY -- JOHN R. LARSON OF COUNSEL DAVIDSON ROBERT C. A WELLINGTON H. LAW CARL SON CHARLES L. LEFEVERE ROBERT L. JOHN M. LEFEVRE, JR. T. JAY SALMEN ROBERT J. LINDALL October 28, 1994 I Jerry Splinter City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 RE: Proposed Charter Amendment Dear Jerry: I understand that at its meeting of October 24, 1994, the city council approved first reading of a proposed charter amendment. After reviewing the proposed amendment, I still have a few minor amendments which I believe might be helpful. They are as follows: 1. In amended section 2.05, the sixth line from the bottom, I would recommend that the words "of the occurrence of the vacancy" be added after the words "act within thirty (30) days ". 2 In new section 2- 05(a), at the end of the fifth line. I would recommend that the words "of the occurrence of the vacancy" be added after the words "within thirty (30) days ". 3. In the second line of new section 2.05(b), paragraph 5, I would recommend that the words "from the occurrence of the vacancy" be added after the words "forty - five (45) days ". 4. Finally, I find the format of new section 2.05(b) somewhat confusing. The paragraphs numbered 1 -6 under section 2.05(b) list a number of procedures which are to be followed in filling a council vacancy. However, these paragraphs follow the introductory language in the first paragraph of section 2.05(b) which provides that the notice of the vacancy "... shall include the following information: ". Therefore, it seems that the information included in paragraphs 1 -6 was intended :.7 Jerry Splinter October 28, 1994 Page 2 only to state the text of the notice of vacancy, rather than to specify that the procedures outlined in paragraphs 1 -6 are to be followed by the city council in filing the vacancy. Therefore, I would recommend that the word "information" in the last line of the first paragraph of section 2.05(b) be deleted and the following language added "description of the application and appointment process, which shall be followed by the city council: ". I assume that these changes would clarify the intent of the charter commission rather than change the substance of the proposed charter amendment. However, the city council can only adopt by ordinance a charter amendment which has been proposed by the charter commission. Therefore, at some time prior to final adoption of the ordinance, if the city council feels that the changes noted above are appropriate, these changes should also be approved by the charter commission. I do not believe, however, that the changes are so substantial that the first reading should be repeated or that the published text of the proposed amendment would have to be republished. If you have any further questions, please feel free to give me a call. Very truly yours, Charles L. LeFevere CLL:ckr c 'a= CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 14th day of November. 1994, at 7 .15 p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amendment to Chapter 2 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER CITY CHARTER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 2.05 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter is hereby amended as follows: Section 2.05. VACANCIES IN THE COUNCIL. When, for any reason, a vacancy should occur in the City Council or office of the Mayor, the City Council must publicly declare such vacancy and species the date of occurrence of the vacancy within ten (10) days of its occurrence. Notice of the vacancy shall be posted at City Hall and sent to the official ci1y newspaper on the next business day. The Mayor or Council member shall forfeit the office for (1) lack at any time during the term of office of any qualification for the office prescribed by this charter or by law, (2) violation of any express prohibition of this charter, (3) conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude, (4) failure to attend three consecutive regular meetings of the Council without being excused by the Council, or (5) f residence from the City If the un term of the Council vacancy dep artu re o � y is less Y than one vote y ear from the date of the occurrence of the vacancy, Council b a majority X y v � of all its remaining members may either appoint a qualified person to fill the vacancy or call for a special election If the unexpired term of the Council vacancy is one year or long a special election shall be called by the Council or by the City Clerk if the Council fails to act within thirty (30) des of the occurrence of the vacancy. Notice of the vacancy, with a description setting forth the minimum set of legal qualifications to hold public office shall be posted at City Hall and sent to the official city newspaper on the next business d _ A quorum of the Council consists of three (3) members if at any time the membership of the Council is reduced to fewer than three (3) members the remaining members may by unanimous action appoint additional members to raise the membership to three (3) without following the procedures set forth in Section 2.0 Sb. [Section 2.05a. PROCEDURES TO FILL COUNCIL VACANCIES. If the unexpired term of the council vacancy is less than one year, the Council by a majority vote of all its remaining members shall appoint a qualified person to fill the vacancy. If the Council fails to fill a vacancy within thirty (30) days, the City Clerk shall call a special I ORDINANCE NO. election to fill the vacancy. The election will be held not sooner than ninety (90) days and not later than one hundred twenty (120) days following the occurrence of the vacancy and to be otherwise governed by the provisions of Section 4.03, Special Elections. If the unexpired term of the council vacancy is one year or longer, a special election shall be called by the Council or by the City Clerk if the Council fails to. act within thirty (30) days. The election will be held not sooner than ninety (90) days and not later than one hundred twenty (120) days following the occurrence of the vacancy and to be otherwise governed by the provisions of Section 4.03, Special Elections. If more than two candidates file for the unexpired term, a primary election shall be held. The quorum of the Council consists of three (3) members; if at any time the membership of the Council is reduced to less than three (3), the remaining members may by unanimous action appoint additional members to raise the membership to three (3).] Section 2.05a. PROCEDURES TO FILL COUNCIL VACANCIES BY SPECIAL ELECTION If the unexpired term of the council vacancv is one vear or longer, or if the unexpired term of the Council vacancy is less than one year and th Council chooses not to fill the vacancy through the appointment process a special election shall be r the City Clerk if the Council fails to act within thin 3 da ys ca lled b the Council o b �, v y v s v of the occurrence of the vacant The election will be held not sooner than nine (90) days and not later than one hundred twenty (120) days following the occurrence of the vacancv and to be otherwise governed by the provisions of Section 4.03. Special Elections. _ If more than two candidates file for the unexpired term a primary election shall be he ld. Section 2.05b. PROCEDURES TO FILL COUNCIL VACANCIES BY COUNCIL APPOINTMENT If the unexpired term of the council vacancy is less t one y the Council by a majority vote of all its remaining members may appoint a qualified pe rson to fill the vacancy. Notice of the vacant with a description setting forth the minimum set of legal qualifications to hold public office shall be posted at Citv Hall and sent to t he official city newspaper on the next business day and shall include the following des cription of the application and aDDOi ntment process which shall be followed by t he C it y Council: 1 Uniform applications in a form approved by the City Council must be received by the City Clerk no later than twenty -one (21) days from the d ate of the declared vacancy. Application forms submitted by the applicants a re public documents Applications shall request at a minimum, all information required by Minnesota Statutes of candidates filing for the office. _ Additional information forms may be adopted by the City Council and shall be required of each applicant uniformly. The applicant may submit a resume, in addition to the uniform application forms. ORDINANCE NO. 2 Tentative interview scheduling shall be completed and posted at City Hall no later than twenjy-five (25) days from the declared vacancy. Applicants shall be responsible for requesting schedule changes. 3 Interview process shall not start earlier than twenty -eight (28) days from the declared vacancy. a Applicants shall be interviewed by the Council, in accordance with the State of Minnesota open meeting laws. b A uniform list of initial questions to be asked of all applicants shall be made available to the public and the applicants in advance of interviews To the extent reasonably practicable questions asked of all applicants at the interviews shall be uniform. 4 Selection Process Upon completion of the interview process, the Council may call for a vote to appoint an applicant Each Council member may cast only one vote for a preferred applicant on each called -for vote to appoint. No vote which does not result in a majority vote for one candidate, shall result in elimination from consideration of any candidate Written ballots listing the ap lip cants) shall be used Each Council member's vote shall be recorded. A simple majority of the Council votes shall appoint that applicant to the City Council. 5 If the Council pursues the appoin tment process but then fails to fill a vacancy within fortes -five 45) days from the occurrence of the vacancy. t City Clerk shall call a special election to fill the vacancy. The special election will be held not sooner than one hundred five (105) days and not later than one hundred thirty -five (135) days following the occurrence of the vacancy and to be otherwise governed by the provisions of Section 4.03 Special Elections If more than two candidates file for the unexpired term, a primary election shall be held. 6 The Citv shall comply with the Minnesota Data Practices Act in all respects in the collection management and dissemination of data on applicants for City Council vacancies. a ORDINANCE NO. Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and thirty days following its legal publication. Adopted this - day of , 1994. Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.) Council Meeting Date 12 -19 -94 31 City of Brooklyn Center A Item Nombe 9 6 Request For Council Consideration - Item Description: An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Zoning Classification of Certain Land (Lutheran Church of the Master). Department Approval: 1 00e oi dvv- - . Ronald A. Warren, Planning and Zoning Specialist Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: It is recommended that the City Council, following a public hearing on this matter, approve this ordinance amendment. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached ) On November 14, 1994, the City Council approved Planning Commission Application No. 94009 submitted by the Evangelical Lutheran Church of the Master, requesting rezoning and development plan approval for a planned unit development involving the church located at 1200 69th Avenue North and the three apartment buildings located to the east at 1100 69th Avenue North, 1107 Emerson Lane, 6907 Dupont Avenue North. The purpose of their proposal was to combine these parcels for the eventual utilization of the buildings thereon for church purposes over a phased, or staged, period of time. This ordinance amendment, which was first read on November 14, 1994 and published in the city's official newspaper on November 23, 1994, is part of the approval process for this planned unit development rezoning. This ordinance amendment, which is a housekeeping -type ordinance amendment, describes the land which has been rezoned to PUD /Rl. The ordinance amendment uses the legal descriptions for the various properties, taking them out of the R4 zoning classification and putting them into the PUD /R1 zoning classification. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 19th day of December, 1994. at 7 :15 p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding the zoning classification of certain land. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LAND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended in the following manner: Section 35 -1130. MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R4). The following properties are hereby established as being within the (R4) Multiple Family Residence District zonin g classification: [Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Brookdale Manor 2nd Addition.] Section 35 -1240. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUD). The following properties are hereby established as being within a (PUD) Planned Unit Development District zoning classification: 1. The following properties are designated as PUD /R1 (Planned Unit Development/One Family Residential): Lots 1 through 12, Block 1 and Lots 1 through 12, Block 2, Twin Lake Meadows; Lot 1 Block 1, Evangelical Lutheran Church of the Master 2nd Addition: Lots 1 2 and 3. Block _1 Brookdale Manor 2nd Addition Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of , 1994. Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Underline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted.) Council Meeting Date 12 -19 -94 3 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number 9� Request For Council Consideration Item Description: An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Zoning Classification of Certain Land (Country Harvest Buffet). Department Approval: Ronald A. Warren, Planning and Zoning Specialist Manager's Review /Recommendation: -�� No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: It is recommended that the City Council, following a public hearing on this matter, approve this ordinance amendment. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached ) On November 28, 1994, the City Council approved Planning Commission Application No. 94014 submitted by Country Harvest Buffet Management, Inc. requesting rezoning and site and building plan approval for a planned unit development involving a 10,000 square foot, 400 seat restaurant at the northwest quadrant of Freeway Boulevard and Shingle Creek Parkway. This ordinance amendment, which was first read on November 28, 1994 and published in the city's official newspaper on December 7, 1994, is part of the approval process for this planned unit development rezoning. The ordinance amendment, which is a housekeeping -type ordinance amendment, describes the land which has been rezoned to PUD /I -1. The ordinance amendment uses the legal descriptions of the various properties transferring them from their current industrial park zone to a new zoning designation of PUD /I -1. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 19th day of December 1994, at 7:15 p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway; to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding the zoning classification of certain land. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LAND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended in the following manner: Section 35 -1200: INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (I -1). The following properties are hereby established as being within the (I -1) Industrial Park District zoning classification: Tract[s] A [and B], R.L.S. No. 1619 Section 35-1240. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUD). The following properties are hereby established as being within a (PUD) Planned Unit Development District zoning classification: 3. The followingproperties are designated as PUD /I -1 (Planned Unit Develovment/Industrial Parkl: Tract B. R.L.S. No. 1619. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of 1994. Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Underline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted.) Council Meeting Date 12 -19 -94 31 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item / Number / Oql Request For Council Consideration Item Description: Planning Commission Application No. 94015 submitted by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Department Approval: Ronald A. Warren, Planning and Zoning Specialist Manager's Review /Recommendation:= � No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: This application was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at its December 8, 1994 meeting subject to conditions of approval. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached ) Planning Commission Application No. 94015 submitted by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company is a request for site and building plan approval for a 1,456 square foot addition to the existing State Farm Automobile Insurance Office and Claims Inspection facility at 5930 Shingle Creek Parkway. This application was considered by the Planning Commission at its December 8, 1994 meeting. Attached are minutes and information sheets from that meeting, a map of the area and site plan. TimeS•aver Sec. 44 B CENTER P01 MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION DECEMBER 8, 1994 CALL TO ORDER The planning Commission met in regular session and was called to order by Chairperson Willson at 7:44 p.m. ROLL CALL Mark Holmes, Chairperson Tim Willson, Commissioners Donald Booth, Debra HilStrom, Robert Mickelson, and Dianne Re= Commissioner Ella Sander was excused from tonight's meeting. Also present were the Secretary to the Planning Commission Planning and Zoning Specialist Ronald Warren, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Lorri Kopischke, APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 17,199A There was a motion by Commissioner Mickelson and seconded by Commissioner Booth to approve the minutes of the November 17, 1994, Planning Commission meeting as submitted. The motion passed. Commissioner Hilstrom abstained as she was not at that meeting. CHAIRPERSON'S EXPLANATION Chairperson Willson explained the Planning Commission is an advisory body. Onc of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council m• aces all final decisions in these matters. APPLICATION NO 94015 (STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY Chairperson Willson introduced the first item of business, a r q=St froin State Farm Muriial Automobile Insurance Company for site and building plat' approval to construct a 1,456 square foot addition to the inspection area and remodeling of general office arca located at 5930 Shingle Creek Parkway, The Secretary presented the staff report, used overhead transparencies to show the location and detail (see' Planning Commission Information Sheet for Application No. 94015, attached ), Chairperson Willson inquired as to the duration that the trailer and tent would be in place. The Secretary indicated that the tent and trailer would be on the site for approximatuly two months. 12 -8 -94 1 TimeSaver Sec. 4--)4 B CENTER P02 Commissioner Holmes inquired if there were any special regulations that applied to this addition and where the trash container for the facility would be located, The Secretary stated this facility was not the type of occupancy that would involve repair. He indicated that the trash container would be located along the out side of the property. PUBLIC HEARING (APPLICATION NO. 94015 Chairperson Willson asked for a motion to open the public hearing on the request from State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company at 7:57 p.m. There was a motion by Commissioner Mickelson and seconded by Commissioner Booth to open the State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company public hearing. The motion passed unanimously. Chairperson Willson asked if there was anyone present who wished to address the Commission. The representatives for State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Mr. Robert Gontarek, Ms. Cheryl Spain and Mr. Mike Keller stepped forward. Mr. Gontarek indicated that the tent and trailer would only be on the site fer a maximum of two months each, with a slight chance of overlap. He Stated that the trailer was nice looking and of good quality. The trailer was large enough to contain private office space and male and female restrooms. He stated that in phase two of the project approximately 13 of the 52 employees affected by the remodeling will be housed in the trailer. The others will be temporarily relocated to different office locations. Commissioner Mickelson asked if the trailer would be handicap accessible. Mr. Gontarek indicated that it would, Commissioner Hilstrom asked when the tent would be up and asked if the lighting could present a fire hazard. Ms. Spain stated that they plan to begin construction in the spring of 1995. She stated that there would be adequate lighting and that there was a possibility that the operating hours may have to be shortened during construction because they will not be able to get as many cars in for inspection. Mr. Gontarek explained that the State Farm building is over 25 years old and in need of refurbishing. He stated that the current garage space will be used for three large customer serrice rooms and a new ftirnace room, They are also planning to update the restrooms. Commissioner Reem asked why the additional required landscaping. was not on the submitted plans. Mr. Contarek explained that the designer at the Illinois Corporate Office: had misunderstood tho point system and thought that only 100 points were necessary. He stated that tho required amount of landscaping points will be included on the set of plans when submitted to the City Council. 12 -5 -94 2 TimeSaver Sec. 434 B CENTER P03 Commissioner Nickelson inquired as to how the tent would look. Mr. Gontarek stated that they would be using a pre - sized, steel structured, sloped canvas tent. He explained that the Edina State Farm Insurance had used the same tent two months ago and the estimators had found it easier to work in the parking lot, so the tent had been taken down early. Commissioner Hilstrom indicated that she was concerned with the lighting, heating and the ventilation for the car exhaust in the tent. Mr. Gontarek stated that the tent was three -sided with an open end. The Secretary indicated that the Building Official has reviewed that matter and is not concerned about safety with respect to the use of the tent. Chairperson Willson called for any more questions for the applicant or for anyone else to speak at the public hearing. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING Thcrc was a motion by Cummissiuncr Nickelson and seconded by Commissioner Booth to close the public hearing at 5:00 p.m. The motion passed unanimously, ACTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ApP (CATION NO. 94015 (STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY? There was a motion by Commissioner Mickelson and seconded by Commissioner Booth to recommend approval of Application 94415 submitted by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company to construct a 1,456 square foot addition to the inspection area and remodeling of general office area located at 5930 Shingle Creek Parkway subject to the following conditions: 1. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the building official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to final review and approval by the Engineering Department) prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site P erformance agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits. 4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 5. The building addition is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFFA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring deice in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City ordinances. 6. Plan approval is exclusive of all signeq, which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City ordinances. 12 -8 -94 3 TimeSaver Sec. y --; B CENTER p04 7. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Site lighting shall comply with Section 35 -712 of the City ordinances and shall not cause lare beyond th g yo a boundaries of the property. 9. The landscape plan shall be modified in the ' h following manner prior t P P g e p o 0 approval by the City Council: a. To show all proposed landscaping on the landscape plan. b. Provide an additional 13.5 landscape points consistent with the landscape point system. Voting in favor: Chairperson Wilson, Commissioners Booth, Hilstrom, Holmes, Reem, and Mickelson. The motion passed. The Secretary noted that the application will be referred to the City Council at the December 19, 1994, meeting. The applicant is required to be present at the City Council meeting. If any changes or modifications are made to the plans prior to City Council consideration, they may have to be brought back before the Planning Commission for review. Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 94015 Applicant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Location: 5930 Shingle Creek Parkway Request: Site and Building Plan Approval The applicant, Mr. Robert Gontarek on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, is requesting site and building plan approval for a 1,456 square foot addition to the existing State Farm Automobile Insurance Office and Claims Inspection facility at 5930 Shingle Creek Parkway. The addition is to the existing vehicle inspection area located on the easterly side of the building and the project also involves remodeling of the general office area including the upgrading of restrooms to ADA requirements. The property in question is zoned C2 (commerce) and office /service uses such as this are considered a permitted use in this zoning district. The site is located at the southeasterly corner of Shingle Creek Parkway and John Martin Drive and is bounded along the west and north respectively by these streets: on the east by the Audio King facility; and on the south by the U.S. West building. ACCESS /PARKING Access to the property is along Shingle Creek Parkway at about the center of the site (right in, right out only) and on John Martin Drive at the northeasterly corner of the property. The accesses will be unchanged. Parking is along the southerly side of the building and the applicant is proposing to reconfigure and restripe the parking lot. Currently parking is 90* parking with drive lanes running north /south. They are proposing to reconfigure the parking in an east/west fashion which makes more spaces closer to the building. The parking requirement for this 12,086 square foot building is 60. The reconfigured parking allows for 83 parking spaces (Note: a full retail use of this building would require 66 parking spaces). Parking for this facility is not an issue and is more than adequate to meet the ordinance requirements for this use. The reconfiguration of the parking lot will necessitate the relocation of an existing light pole which is located in the center of the parking lot. DRAINAGE / GRADING /UTILITIES No significant alterations are being made with respect to this part of the plan. A catch basin located in the center of the parking lot conveys storm water through existing storm sewer to the City storm sewer facilities in Shingle Creek Parkway. Some alterations are being made in the existing curb, north of the inspection facility to accommodate site circulation. Also concrete curb is being repaired at various locations around the parking lot. Repair to damaged asphalt paving is also proposed as a part of this project. This site, which is 1.8 acres, is not required to be reviewed by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission as part of this project. 12 -08 -94 1 Planning Commission Information Sheet BUILDING As mentioned, the building addition would be to the existing vehicle inspection area which is currently an approximate 52' by 28' appendage to the easterly side of the building. This area contains 8 overhead doors (4 on the northerly side and 4 on the southerly side). The addition will about double the size of this area. Internally the applicant proposes to construct customer services offices into a portion of the existing inspection area and remove 2 overhead doors, 1 on the north side and 1 on the south side so that only 6 overhead doors serve the vehicle inspection area. Also, other office remodeling will take place throughout the building as well as restroom remodeling. They, are planning on doing the remodeling in 3 phases in order to keep the facility operational throughout construction. While the vehicle inspection area is closed and being remodeled, they plan to have a 20' by 30' tent to be located along the south side of the building in the parking lot for estimating purposes. This tent would be up until the inspection area is complete. In Phase II, which consists of the office and restroom remodeling, the applicant plans to locate a 24' by 48' mobile office trailer across the drive lane opposite the main entrance to the building in order to house office employees effected by the interior remodeling. It is my understanding that the tent will only be there until the inspection area is complete. There may be some overlap in having both the tent and the office trailer on the site at the same time, but this should be only a very short time. For the most part, the tent and the office trailer will not be on the site together. Our main concern is that these facilities not become permanent and that their location not cause significant parking problems. The building exterior is proposed to match the existing exterior. LANDSCAPING The applicant has submitted an existing site and landscape plan in response to the landscape point system. This 1.8 acre site requires 180 landscape points. Their evaluation shows only 166.5 landscape points. It appears they are proposing to add a deciduous tree at the southwest portion of the Shingle Creek Parkway greenstrip. The plan notes 17 decorative trees, however, they are not indicated on the plan. Six coniferous trees are shown on the south side of the building along with 20 shrubs. The plan calls for 70 shrubs which also, are not shown on the plan. It is recommended that the landscape plan be modified to provide at least an additional 13.5 landscape points consistent with the landscape point system. LIGHTING /TRASH As mentioned previously, a light standard located in the center of the parking lot will be removed. Additional lighting on 30' high light poles will be located on the south and west greenstrips next to the parking lot. The plans note that the lighting will have lenses, reflectors or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the property. The lighting plan calls for 250 watt high - pressured sodium luminators. These lights should not cause glare off of the property. 12 -08 -94 2 Planning Commission Information Sheet The applicant plans to construct a new trash enclosure facility on the west side of the sight. It will be a 6' high masonry enclosure with face brick to match the building and contain steel gates. It will sit on an approximate 25' by 40' concrete slab. RECOMMENDATION For the most part, with the exception of landscape plan modifications, the State Farm plans appear to be in order. Approval is recommended subject to at least the following conditions: 1. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the building official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Grading, drainage and utility plans are subject final review and approval by the Engineering Department, prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site performance agreement in supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits. 4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screen from view. 5. The building addition is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City ordinances. 6. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery, which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City ordinances. 7. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Site lighting shall comply with Section 35 -712 of the City ordinances and shall not cause glare beyond the boundaries of the property. 9. The landscape plan shall be modified in the following manner prior to approval by the City Council: a. To show all proposed landscaping on the landscape plan. b. Provide an additional 13.5 landscape points consistent with the landscape point system. 12 -08 -94 3 .1111 111 HIP �� ♦ ••♦► ©�� ��� ♦� ♦ �� �� ! _ / 1 11oil P� • ►�!�► : � �� ►�� ♦�♦� • -- �' 111 11111 X111 2 AN 1111 III - _ � : 11 1 11111 11 �i �� �," ii �� ■��" � � •_• i 11111111 11 s` ► ����"'�:i��'� J � - ! , 1 11111 ME 1111111 X11 1111 �� '111 111 111111 _ ■ ilk � 1�11� 11 1111 111 -�., ..I...._._ � ®, ..: • _, - - ' ■ : 1111 ■1 1111 ■I■ ���� 11111 �� 'II 1111 1 1� X111■ 11 , ��; ; � .. ` �j�j� ON 1 11 Pmrn .nns r< wttr, wl,€Y t w n 't"E.t, ,Ian ,K'Yr•,ra4a•. POOL ,,.. - C • .,.rrry Y a •aa wo-av a �•vulroe ksA„'Y. K• b. Sn€ae'9.l&,a« 3 >'.'oK."9.aach« eAR• a^.vsAa a:>b� . «r -- rAa�xTb „ 1 _Li_ il'• Qd € Ia € n °O1 saev�n ! �I' '' - -yt.S is ,. €.. .. I( d G�fT , I �' - -- a .er, V .u, wara !V —.rr aurt �) `�� ':}-- ...I�- j_.••.. I. /:I .r." " _ �f� /' I . • '"' OY , < K 5 PARKIN STALL __ PARKING SIFlLt. - r� roo�Kxl «rYr• a POO AR SI N to POOL CAR SIGN ARK «..n.+ t ARK SIA I, C -7 1• vIA•• 1' r C.1 X 1, n r.r C.7 C7 I Z. ' I w ,,.•M If4l ,ru brf, rN I • .r n.. ,n _rl':I„nr .I',I'i'n l ,,.nr ,n, ..,,ri, 1 vI li R PARKIN IGN : ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN 7 ACC SSIOLE PARKING SIGN " " "' ^' °° 11 ::+. \ i .,A 1 ' " "' .- ;.I uw,r %••Ir •ar.,u. C.2 noxu ,p,.alr,r C.t wuhr .us•.n m,r ` '� t•� �. ` r11 l l IRI I PAR']" ' At I. Nrrru -TES `a tw'.Krw •" ro .n� �.�,:.rto n•a .a' e _ ,,, . I I I �F M /� r „`�� /'! a «•ra -. l .a.l r , , . .. "°' i ^rim .�h •i.trl•rcs ra N s s o . 2' i• �_,7`'. •f ., r•em wrlrh ,nnli +" a a�v.'c.. a {�,."i "vi rv "Atnsiloscoomas.+o •ta r,. r,. �..:f,: ,,....,r. ', -. . J. IK. i•:a' • r rP r•r• sK SY[r n rK , t+'..nn „" "' I ., . [[wL.,,t rrw u'.ayw•u •, • 0 ,YI+ ha IR a „rl +l,l•sy Q wi1rM'SO V " •n "I �y ••t •0 I •, ,.,, I _ .' ' Ca �"�, ^! ��r Mia'.:cr ra <a•om•r< R N" ua o m••I IIIPI a ama•hc'la - I YI'IfM. I I. RMIH/, I IIIN - , .� se tMl •ta. ,r'raa : •• o r Mh KIV o Y S••IL K • _ ♦f r ' '•K•a aw, . •c. a• wsrrnwe rY o•v . w cos• K aw +. I YPICAI < CURR GU11 LII , �;..:,,,.,r..n�al «:��;�[.h.,. .. �. t. �, l«.• — " �� .i''I�i' � Ili 1 ta••K•m wwr a••, r •n, h �� ,c•wt aoch. uss +. , a ,t•wnro MriM•iw a n, [4 Xn,.r I I •. ir�:,im «r...l s"n tou, w u'Nln r.en,, u + +rct nr�ta # ' o r rY m,K. x .. ♦ cs'wa r•rt .•1'K +n• loco •was o a ry h €nvmc ,,•, 10 H, NI L' ,Ir rid ; F lPtl' IiN•11 ',II !ION vat•aovn wnnns •na t rrr. _ —__— E PARKING STALL •� -� - r,rn �'�+ - _ • '�� - -1� SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY eA L.1 .,., uwt ",•>AUJa •, i ��:' ' , `i .arin. i�;ie. ° " !' / .. -.._ _ d• 'l l 1111111 1 MIfJA II I YI 1 It . I III (11 I __ — _ _ '_ ,• W. €a[ sru o �It 1 l - l•h•F4 YIU•a ` r :f mom__ Y � f 1 1 � .:�'•:�< �._- � n•ir°o.<:l, .:Ir[hr �_� •® .. II . 11' �(y t- ' n *� r_ =':= ==J t— _--l. ' -- 5t j'• •.,'�, .' il.� IIl it I' I' ' I y .. `i \ V �� _ 1, `rrn ��•'. 1 I � I II I..I I I I ; % r -- ,�� rr.mq'r .—� rK ';� 1 - _ • / 1� \1\ 11 0 ` b AI 1 € - Itll I Ir :I I I lul) -nt� . (t___ r)t a f• " '_- � - -� w 1 - L� ! /- rn� 1 �1 m 1 ) n�w • 1 I I - - n .t +n • 1 1 A . .. .�� ONE STORY j± C >_ • - - - s y ,o," NG OFFICE 8111101 } �••; ::1 , „ , ! - - - - 1 . 1 _ Y''_ i — nrn v.lns so. , _ m l r ., 1 ' is P> ,• ., I . , A , � • ara. 1 l jrr� �r n.r '-• — r..► « n =r n :- •, r_r,Y .J `I, �i� /; ', ` i .. O r. ..... mn., n, ..,,n ,, ., n r.. n, n, • • � •.•r m ,anrw / I 1 � L J = r �.., f I i j t a r ,r ,.. Da r €t • i,'1 rY 0.C.r ®, - } - —C( i 1 \ I , f . ) • or , rr a t -n ar- . s,aa, w r <.... %• •., j / r b ' ,. r, •, <� l;' „;, °r M + .i 1"::4,• ":.'n.'. . , r w . ,,. L . u ,.,,n . • 1 ”' sr, fi Lff- -- --- I+ L ��• I / 1 0 .,. «n•, « r ,,, ,,,. „, « «r «., w, ...., r ,,,,r • % , ��,�� I •Jr ,x nu nn ,. 1 ; i� v► �E � �_.. - CO r,,.n. ,rwwn •a ,, .,., r,rrl n, 386.44 �� 4A x•m•Y nn nK.rn •r, . •u n,.l r •u•, I •» , r ` r N47'12'5I'E J 69 vm«,nn t",r „ r .r ,. ,• .. ,"r rmin. .. yrr. .n r , ., MEN NEW SITE PLAN r rt r R MK•1 M 41 M 1• r n r nn nar rI t•„r[ra a•a w ,rr ti � .. BROOKLYN CENTER STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY I ri.M nn..r w<,a r• ax..n PAIA J s C • •••r•., r„a wr a r•ra ram ONE Stott VA”" L SLOOMINGIIM .ILLINOIS 61718 - - __ •. a w'a rrr • rK s.r•w . SERVICE CENTER REMODEL rr�r 1 S ITE LEGEND rm ow L,n. I..l rn cn n^En ' C.A. CLE^N PPr ll C.P. [nrCH Pn51x x I 1 of ffME — N'l IHMIf . IPf[ 11P IIKIRI IHI( Pn5 11n55H I-E nA IM.IM 1 ^[E - brry»rlr, 5111.. 11M.I110r!_ 0.9115__ - __ SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY ^"' ^'^'""• wss .'ETYE'1NWFC .. ,. • • � � ' %tii ° sire —_ 1 ' � �' '� .,. ...r .,.. •. • I I . ,I,x q IW nl 111 Iis ONE - SJURY 1� ti i Is l �bb�sriw•I - �j rsn.x' On FICCE BUILDING UNUInL RII UHMn I IM .. i l.. :III AM. i t ' ice' 6i I / r nx. I O C i 1 r• ,I III I r A I • xw• n I r ��rl x1 - • 1wt ' C 1. / �IrFlw I .._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._. ._.._..._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._. jnrr..+ t N. 7'4T51*E u.c.nnnw - CJ EXISTING SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN Xh4 I'•F...� . k r MM %a11 roNI r _ __..PIUE'LRV McrP P:'NW.___ • E.IS- 1H4y!y4 ;S_I_. L. _.._LMi— .1___L SICN ��r�r �lnl� �..• Mrlr iwllnlxr•rn"xl nrnllrtl w» rn x1 ,Ir IilMi,w l n ln ilili.� r h • � r. irwi ' iw 'l iw • I (M1lrxnn• .xx w ' • µr bfbwN•r rwn n.l r .. r� S i�irixx w,lrr. Iw. rOft Nbl^NM V xl . .__16a.f EIIIUM IPoIIFAINN MIEM - JpAmmr IPN4 .IAN 11M -I v t Rim[L �;�p w; • : ��, BROOKLYN CENTER STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 f° :.. , r.Ir...t.. ,y. ,..I. n..r...a • SERVICE CENTER 1 REMODEL DW EI11I[ raw RIIEII xow INGI011,uululs snu 1 AAA-- SEE PHASING PLANS SHEETS C -0 DEMOLITION K EYN TES 1TH15 SNE.E? ONLY1. —__ Q �ylsnxc Nx l to D[ xrmro Mp D ivnaD nrt.w. r•n'nr litl.rM R4 nS MffS'�xw nw'vrl IN rrlx. vnr. m Rnl Pp•Iw MSrr San xxlirNll In My rllxn rxn •rIN. . ®� Mlxlnnrnw w.11 nrm M Nwnx� Ix r,l r n L. ' UNN,I[M 1 I1ILIRN.x •1 r5 Ilxr 'N lnr rY v,n «, ((��jj Q MNI Mrl Sm I I MM DI'Af •1SI� Ff I'rt r'M . P � _ (� RLMivL Ln.liw� INMN rwnlrNN. // • ® IMSIIM. IN n Rrq inxN '7 N µIll. n ; Q i iv[ IDx ww1Y1 R.�Mx'!INnrl r IscnvNS. •al narwuM .NIL.. ® m l; M l in aie In r„x.xn NnM,I '+ n,a .Mx' �_� n LeMnwllw� non.. Ixrrolw'u r.w ml r�n•� �; � �J f� _ _ ___ _ _..::__._ _ (q mrxM nr.nN. mnx.m xnn•, •.Rrl IxnM ,In w ,ry l'a. «Ixr wr M'NOM Irn'w�,ar.r« ,. nr. L ✓ / / / L 'fD . °a r,Rrnrl r Innrnnr n 1 aaur as LIOIw, rN, rr nx,r q� „ nY,q� „ .rxr: / 112 OI c1Dr.a S11NS nN rn rr , / I �nrm I N L - 1- ( CJ `- . - -�:. - - � as w +nl LI•.nw, r•NN, M:. N ul. n. L.ral«D. r — lu oa ao 1 _J A:— 1z7 wx..e„� IIB ° @}\ YIINM1 is 0 n .- 1"., i I n x. rl .x ^ �iYl nlw. rwlrNn r �•«r .,,nn. r,r q II� I D . !•: 1 115 � iNnnl�nr ie�"ia �w i ^ : r� �IB9�,. '�-Qi .'•, �' °�•, KSVJLLL II � Q/ N x • I IA I'.qw: rbl rn,M RXn. nl nrn, r: . 'i 116__ ' •- �� .. I �I .vnW mNn •..�..�. 0 v�M�xi ry Mvl nna rNr1N'S Nr^r M�rwr.M r ._..` � (r // CI x« r x ryn in•. rru ,nx.r•, J _ 1 b Nli f�<b: 11 ^n r.r1ln':: rm.rN rn, e r. ... ... ,... °f � (. rM IrlSnw IINn lnxnlw Inrw IV wxl r, � �- ��:_���• y: �� � � � � �� % �:: -:. ., %1 al nllx vM• •+I IID:n IN r'•wD ulanxnx (117 "�.1 / _ GENEf1l1L NO_IES_, `� I V / i �_ /� f .• r JC >. , II . w vNIMMI r'n IIM. /MI V�nb n Ir x J L ;� _.—® T. • i+uM wNlwO nr nvN .. R Intllr i�Drw _ �QL �• ' 1 L MI 'lI NS xwN111 W�wl Mrlr µlµ l "•rvlSl Irr 11 N1 'r a ;\ nrr r n r rN 1115wnD rlx " •(�• IBZ .. IBJ �'� ,, wllllp xlrN lxwMI IxIS11M, IDN hI1MANpNO � S. nSIq SInS �MIDM n,r vlll xw1V1 Mr INnS r, MnN Siv! IB5 �� IB �J `� � \ xN nn;l uM n rM'.IwN.rlxr. • (D _ A a n.M Snn nxmM.nn m Ana m rlN« 'nx> ��j rIM nIM'• xxN tilvl r IwN r Irn IR 1lrllw. L W I W I''SS``'' — -� KEY TO ELEVATIONS LE.GEyO • ® FLOOR PLAN — DEMOLITION _� LNISIMG N x11 DRNnIN K M• • I•�I ' Xf NDN�' >, nMxlrlm. _ u"IIND li s Rlx°vlo ore a°w Ir ^�q1 R/Q'LL BROOKLYN CENTER ML.r.L....L.r.� ... FST FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY Nrrr•un w M s w nxrr • Y xNxx� nY,a •wr n i xanN E iNM R�211 BIgL /OO /QI , 0.LINOIf il)w A —I N. Dn.x NxYD • a r..... SERVICE CENTER wl°xu•° rr.. NII ,mom oom FINISH SCHEOIJUE No. TW JROOM NAME I FLOOR BASE . .ALL LM SENA KS . CEI LING_ I I TO__ - - - KEYED NOTES FI - T. L C .... RATERIAL FINISH -t & FIM . T (D EW �R�Tm4-- LMG' c— ITT ITIN i , TYR o lf- (D U. g tL-S V'7.—Kl 11 A. W- ID - cm 1 0D 4 r - 1 -1. 4.. -11. X II* -,- -- - - ;;7 Q) w, 7p 0 — . j.;VA�g Tro (!D Wt. "N'.. VaL. r101 4 GYPSUM QQARQ NOTES —1. SE � C; ;;z: -�. W ir tL' " —A I's NE. --7 In rw.w . .... ..... IF-- n -TT. SE. 6;; Kll� 4 LL L a g p mcw arr ^ iF ----------- f --- 1 116 0 )h -4 . .. ..... - ............. b� 1 ;p II) V t L w^ I FN- M • Ri P. I Al 1 IN X I E I I V. LIB d. ------- --- Ize _Tj L 4 C) Q i 'I J WAL I H11 I 110N 11,11 t h I� -1 '.L 23 U ( ILXr,ELEV. t z .�1�I A - ----- --- REMODEL FLOOR PLAN LUEND D+ A K�. W - 1 C GENERAL NOTES KEY 10 ELEVATIONS g E:14113ANCE DETAIL BROOKLYN CENTER FSTATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY use TNE —2 THE STATE F� PLAZA BLOG.IMTON . ILLIMIS 61718 A _ SERVICE CENTER REWOE� Council Meeting Date 12/19/94 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Numbe 3 Request For Council Consideration Item Description: PUBLIC HEARING: RELATING TO THE MODIFICATION OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 AND THE CREATION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3 Department Approval: G. Bmd Hoffman, Comrhunity Development D' t Manager's Review/Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Staff recommends the Council /EDA pass the appropriate resolutions and establish the tax increment district. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached --Ye-s The Council will hold a public hearing Monday evening on a proposed redevelopment tax increment district. 'Further, the Council will be asked to pass a resolution establishing that district. The district is comprised of three separate areas within the City. (There are maps of the areas within the plan proper). In general, the areas are the area around Brookdale, the area around 69th and Brooklyn Boulevard, and an area along the north side of Highway 694 from Willow Lane to Xerxes. The proposed redevelopment tax increment district takes advantage of the special legislation passed for Brooklyn Center (authored by Phil Carruthers) which exempts the City from the LGA/HACA penalties normally applied to tax increment districts. This district over time will constitute the City's and /or EDA's primary revenue source for such projects as the redevelopment of Brooklyn Boulevard, the acquisition of blighted apartment buildings and single - family homes, and all other redevelopment projects the City determines to undertake. The district is set up to last up to a maximum 25 years, although the City can elect to terminate the district at any time the Council deems appropriate. By establishing the district, the Council will in effect establish a base market value on all properties within the district from which future taxes will continue to flow to the various taxing entities. At the same time, the 1995 tax rate will establish the cap on tax increment that will be generated by new or added market value to the district. The tax increment district will capture for redevelopment purposes all new value about the established base value at the 1995 tax rate for the next 25 years (assuming the district remains in place for that time period). If the Council or any other taxing entity should increase their respective tax rate, the increase from the new tax rate would go to the taxing entity, not the tax increment district. As an example, let's say the base value of the district was a hypothetical $10,000,000 and the base tax rate was 100. Two years Request For Council Consideration Page 2 later, the tax increment district's market value is $15,000,000 and the tax rate is now 120. Taxes generated within the district would be at the 120 rate on the full $15,000,000. The tax increment district would receive taxes based upon $5,000,000 in value at the 100 tax rate and the remainder would go to the various taxing . entities. The total base value of the proposed tax increment district is $203,316,300. The total market value of the City is an estimated $974,000,000, so that approximately 21% of the City's tax base would be in a tax increment district. However, under the current tax increment laws, the fiscal impact on the City as previously described has been reduced considerably. Further, the City/EDA will be allowed to charge off related administrative costs up to 10% of the tax increment. Such expenses can include some of the costs for providing services to the district. Based upon a number of assumptions, the district cash flow could grow to an estimated $3,000,000. The special legislation which allows Brooklyn Center to establish a district without the LGA/HACA penalty requires the City/EDA to establish a housing fund. The fund will receive 15% of the tax increment. However, the fund's use in housing activity is left to the City to determine what housing - related activities are appropriate. The acquisition and demolition of blighted properties, for example, would be allowed. During the past month or so the Council has given approval to a number of developments, including restaurants and hotels. The tax increment district would capture these developments as they occur. As you review the plan, you will note that this district has the potential to provide the City /EDA with a significant cash flow in the future to address a variety of redevelopment issues. Earlier this year, the City established a new project area that included the entire City, with the exception of a few blocks in the northeast section of the City. The City will be able to spend up to 25 % of the tax increment on eligible property anywhere within the project area. Within the tax increment district proper, the City may expend 100 % of the fund if it were so determined. Monday evening, staff will review the plan with the Council. Also, a representative from Publicorp will be available to answer your questions. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, ESTABLISHING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 03, AND APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATED TIIERETO, LOCATED WITHIN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO 1 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council ") of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals 1.01. It has been proposed that the City modify the Redevelopment Plan for Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1, and establish Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 and approve and adopt the Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto, located within Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1, all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047, inclusive; Minnesota Statutes 469.090 through 469.0181, inclusive, and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179, inclusive; and 1994 Minnesota Laws, Chapter 587, Article 9, Section 14; and 1.02. The Council has investigated the facts and has caused to be prepared a Modified Redevelopment Plan for Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 (the "Plans "). 1.03. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the modification of Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 and the adoption of the Plans relating thereto, including, but not limited to, notification of Hennepin County and School Districts Nos. 11, 279, 281 and 286 having taxing jurisdiction over the property to be included in Tax Increment District No. 03, a review by the City Planning Commission of the proposed Plans and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law. Section 2. Findings for the Modification of the Redevelopment Plan for Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No 1, the Establishment of .Tax Increment Financing District No 03 and the Approval of the Tax Increment Financing_ Plan relating thereto 2.01. The Council hereby finds that Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 is a redevelopment district. RESOLUTION NO. 2.02. The Council hereby inds that the modification of the Redevelopment Plan for y P Housing Development Project No. 1 and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 and the approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto, are intended and, in the judgment of this Council, the effect of such actions will be to provide an impetus for redevelopment in the public purposes and accomplish certain objectives as specified in the Plans. '2.03. The Council further finds that the proposed development, in the opinion of the Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary; that the Plans conform to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole; and that the Plans will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 by private enterprise. 2.04. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the above findings stated in Section 2 and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in writing, attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 3. Annroval of the Plans 3.01. The modifications to the Redevelopment Plan for Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 are hereby approved and adopted, and shall be placed on file in the office of the City Manager. 3.02. The City staff of the City, the.City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Plans and for this purpose to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk RESOLUTION NO. resolution was dui seconded b The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Y Y member win voted in thereon, the folio v t and upon vote being taken the g po g favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. IT A The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 3, are as follows: 1. Finding that Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 is a redevelopment district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 10. District No. 03 is a scattered site district with three sites consisting of 221 parcels of land and adjacent and internal rights -of -way of which 174 parcels contain existing houses and structures. Parcels consisting of more than 70 percent of the area are occupied by buildings and improvements. Buildings have been reviewed by City staff and consultants and more than 50 , percent have been found to be structurally substandard. (See Exhibit II -C on Data on Qualifications as a Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District on page II-C -1 of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 and spreadsheets compiled by City staff for each of the three sites in District No. 03). 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. Due to the high cost of redevelopment on parcels currently occupied by substandard buildings, the limited amount of industrial property for expansion adjacent to the existing project area, the incompatible land uses at close proximity, and the cost of financing the proposed improvements, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. 3. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The site is appropriately zoned. The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 has been reviewed by the Planning Commission and been found to conform to the general development plan of the City. 4. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 by private enterprise. The establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 will result in the facilitation of redevelopment in several areas of the City. Publicorp Inc. 512 Crown Roller Mill (612) 341 -3646 1 P' Fifth Avenue South FAX (612) 341 -4148 t zapolis, MN 55401 Brooklyn Center Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 1. Is the proposed Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District established by the Tax Increment Act or a special law? The proposed district is established by special law. The 1994 Minnesota legislature authorized the City to establish a TIF district that is exempt from the Local Government Aid (LGA) and Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA) offset, provided the City uses 15% of the increment for housing activities. 2. What is the LGA -HACA offset? The legislature, particularly the House, has been concerned about the "cost to the state" of TIF. While TIF proponents argue that there is no cost because of the "but for" test, the legislature enacted a provision that requires a portion of a city's LGA - HACA be retained by the state as an offset for increased school aid payments. 3. Will the new district capture the proceeds of a future referendum levy? No, the tax increment law has been amended to prevent a TIF district from capturing such levies. A district established since 1990 must, as part of the certification process, identify a certified tax capacity rate. The rate, which for the proposed district will be the total tax capacity rate for taxes payable in 1995, will be the maximum rate that will be used to calculate TIF. The following example illustrates the certified tax capacity rate: Certified Tax Capacity Rate: 128% District Captured Tax Capacity: $500,000 Tax Capacity Rate in Subsequent Years: 130.0% Subsequent Year TIF = Captured Tax Capacity x Frozen Rate $640,000 = $500,000 x 128% The total taxes paid by the parcels in the district are calculated using the 130% rate, but the TIF is based on the frozen rate. A property in the district, however, will pay the same taxes as a similar property located outside the district. In the example, the additional 2% or $10,000 wilt be distributed to the entities that levied the taxes. If a referendum levy is enagf�O . subse quent to the certification of this TIF District, :.: _.. . the proceeds of the referendum will 'be paid to the school district. "A combination of school aid law, general tax law and 11F law. require the total payment of the referendum levy to the school district. The School Aids Bill of 1994 permits referendum levies, but requires the levy to be calculated on market value and not tax capacity. A similar provision governs a referendum for cities. Because the referendum levy is based on market value, it is not part of the frozen rate and is calculated separately. 4. What happens if the total tax rate in a subsequent year is below the frozen rate? The TIF district's captured value would be taxed at the rate and the taxes would be paid to the TIF district. The taxes from the market value referendum tax rate would continue to flow to the school district. 5. Briefly describe the proposed district. The district is a scattered site district consisting of 212 parcels of land and adjacent and internal rights -of -ways of which 174 parcels contain existing houses and structures. A description of each site follows: • Site A - Brooklyn Boulevard /69th Area, which contains 75 parcels of which 67 are occupied by structures. • Site B - Brockdale Area, which consists of 72 parcels of which 62 are occupied by structures. • Site C - Willow /252 Area, which consists of 65 parcels of which 45 are occupied by structures. A map identifying the district and each site will be available at the meeting. 6. What is the estimated captured value of the district? Upon completion of the developments, the captured value is estimated to be $4.7 million. 7. How long will the district last? By statute, the district can collect increment for up to 25 years. 8. How has the City used TIF and how does its usage compare to other cities? The City has established two districts. The Brookwood district plan was adopted in 1983 and can, by statute, be extended to 2008. The Earle Brown Farm district was established in 1985 and can, by statute, be extended to 2010. The City can decertify the districts prior to the statutory dates. For taxes payable in 1993, the City's total tax value in the TIF districts was $1.3 million or 5.3% of the total tax base. The 5.3% amount is below the county average of 9.68 %. A complete listing of Hennepin County cities and use of TIF is enclosed. 3 ar%b:�bftedevbf.aue 114/94 City of Brooklyn CenteNEDA - Tax Increment District No. 03 Page 3 _ ESTMATED MOACTS ON JURISDICTIONS % OF CTC ENTITY S CAPTURED % OF IN SCHOOL TAX TAX CAP. CTC TO DISTRICT BASE (CTC) BASE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 21,563,017 4,700,000 21.80% HENNEPIN COUNTY 928,379,673 4,700,000 0.51% SCHOOL DISTRICT 279-0 BB /69th: 23.48% 67,083,479 1,103,681 1.65% SCHOOL DISTRICT 281-0 Brookdale 40.97% 70,036,202 1,925,717 2.75% SCHOOL DISTRICT 11-0 Willow/252 2.63% 20,172,541 123,617 0.61% SCHOOL DISTRICT 286 -0 Willow/25 32.91% 7,140,511 1,546,985 21.66% CAPTURED ENTITY'S TAX TAX POTENTIAL CAPACITY RATES TAXES CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER" 4,700,000 0.27603 1,297,341 HENNEPIN COUNTY 4,700,000 0.37441 1,759,727 OTHER 4,700,000 0.07043 331,021 SCHOOL DISTRICT 279-0 BB/69th: 1,103,681 0.66786 737,104 SCHOOL DISTRICT 281-0 Brookdale: 1,925,717 0.64401 1,240,181 SCHOOL DISTRICT 11-0 Willow/252: 123,617 0.57161 70,661 SCHOOL DISTRICT 286-0 Willow/252: 1,546,985 0.56614 875,810 TOTAL IN S.D. #279 1.38873 1,532,715 TOTAL IN S.D. #281 1.36488 2,628,372 TOTAL IN S.D. #11 1.28439 151,066 TOTAL IN S.D. #286 1.28701 11QQM TOTAL 6,303,139 Tax capacity totals only include portion of district in Hennepin County. Includes HRA tax rate BT100-08 Prepared by Publicorp Inc. PLANRUN Modified Redevelopment Plan for - Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 (A Redevelopment District) Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority Hennepin County City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Prepared: December 12, 1994 Adopted: December 19, 1994 Prepared by: PUBLICORP, INC. 512 Crown Roller Mill 105 Fifth Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55401 (612) 341 -3641 MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN (This section is not part of the Redevelopment Plan and is only for convenience of reference.) Based upon the statutory authority described in the Modified Redevelopment Plan attached hereto, the public purpose findings by the City Council and the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority and for the purpose of fulfilling the City's and Economic Development Authority's redevelopment and housing objectives as set forth in the Modified Redevelopment Plan, the City Council and Authority have created, established and designated Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and have created, established, and designated Housing Development Project No. 01 pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047. The following municipal action was taken in connection therewith: Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 (formerly the Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project): luiv 22, 1985 The Redevelopment Plan for the Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project was and the City Council. Housing and Redevelopment tY adopted by the Brooklyn Center g ment Authority p April 9, 1990 The Redevelopment Plan for the Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project was modified by the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority. April 25, 1994 The Redevelopment Plan for the Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project was modified by the Brooklyn Center City Council and Economic Development Authority to reflect an enlargement of geographic area, increased budget authority and renaming of project. November 21, 1994 The Redevelopment Plan for Housing Development and Redevelopment District No. 1 was amended by the Economic Development Authority to specify certain redevelopment objectives and land acquisition needs. December 19, 1994 The Redevelopment Plan for Housing Development and Redevelopment District No. 1 was modified by the Brooklyn Center City Council and the Economic Development Authority to reflect increased budget authority. Housing Development Project No. 01 (incorporated into Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1): April 11, 1983 The Housing Development Project Plan for Housing Development Project No. 01 was adopted by the Brooklyn Center Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City Council. April 9, 1990 The Housing Development .Plan for Housing Development Project No. 01 was modified by the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority to reflect expansion of the geographic boundaries. AAgril 25, 1994 The Housing Development Plan for Housing Development Project No. 01 was modified by the Brooklyn Center City Council and Economic Development Authority to be incorporated into the expanded Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project, hereafter referred to as Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1. The following municipal action was taken with regard to the tax increment financing districts located with located within Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1, incorporating the Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project and Housing Development Project No. 01: Tax Increment Financing District No. 01 April 11, 1983 The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment District No. 01 (the Brookwood Project Tax Increment Financing District) was adopted by the Brooklyn Center Housing and Redevelopment Authority. April 9, 1990 The Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Brookwood Tax Increment Financing District was modified by the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 469.175, Subd. 4. April 25, 1994 The Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Brookwood Tax Increment Financing District was modified by the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority and City Council pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4. Earle Brown Farm Tax Increment Financing District luly 22, 1985 The Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Earle Brown Farm Tax Increment Financing District was adopted by the Brooklyn Center Housing and Redevelopment Authority. April 9, 1990 The Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Earle Brown Farm Tax Increment Financing District was modified by the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority. April 25, 1994 The Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Earle Brown Farm Tax Increment Financing District was modified by the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority and City Council pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4. Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 December 19, 1994: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 was approved by the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority and City Council to provide assistance to various commercial redevelopment and housing development projects within the District. TABLE OF CONTENTS (This Table of Contents is not part of the Redevelopment Plan and is only for convenience of reference.) SECTION I. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTNO. 1 ..................... ............................... I -1 Subsection 1.1. Definitions ........... ............................... I -1 Subsection 1.2. Statement and Finding of Public Purpose ...................... 1 -2 Subsection 1.3. Statutory Authority ...... ............................... 1 -5 Subsection 1.4. Statement of Objectives .. ............................... 1 -5 Subsection 1.5. Environmental Controls .. ............................... 1 -6 Subsection 1.6 Proposed Reuse of Property .............................. 1 -6 Subsection 1.7. Administration and Maintenance of Housing Development and Redevelopment Project ........................... 1 -6 Subsection 1.8 Relocation ........... ............................... 1 -7 Subsection 1.9. Boundaries of Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 11-7 Subsection 1.10 Parcels to be Acquired or May Be Acquired in Whole or in Part Within the Housing Development and Redevelopment Project ... 1 -7 Subsection 1.11 Modification of Redevelopment Plan and/or Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No.1 ............. 1 -8 Exhibit I -A -1 Map of Project ........ ............................... A -1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 03 Section II: Tax Increment Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 .......... 11 -1 A. Statutory Authority ........... ............................... II -1 B. Statement of Obi1 ectives ....... ............................... II -1 C. Housing Development and Redevelopment Plan Overview ............. 11 -2 D. Description of Property in District No. 03 ......................... 11 -2 E. Classification of the Tax Increment Financing District ................. 11 -5 F. Property To Be Acquired ...... ............................... II -6 G. Estimate of Costs ............ ............................... 11 -6 H. Estimated Amount of Loan /Bonded Indebtedness .................... II -7 I. Sources of Revenue .......... ............................... II -7 J. Original Tax Capacity ......... ............................... II -8 K. Amount of Captured Tax Capacity ............................... II -8 L. Duration of District No. 03 ..... ............................... II -8 M. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions ...................... II -8 N. Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing District ................ II -10 O. Administrative Expenses ...... ............................... II -11 P. Necessary Improvements in District No. 03 ..................... 11 -11 Q. Limitation on Qualification of Property in Tax Increment District Not Subiect to Improvement ............................ II -11 R. Limitation on the Use of Tax Increment .......................... II -12 S. Notification of Prior Planned Improvements ....................... II -12 T. Excess Tax Increments ....... ............................... II -12 U. Requirement for Agreements with the Developer ................. II -13 V. Assessment Agreements ...... ............................... II -13 W. Administration of District and Maintenance of the Tax Increment Account . 11 -13 X. Financial Reporting Requirements .............................. 11 -14 Y. Municipal Approval .............................. 11 -14 Z. Countv Road Costs ........ ........... ...................... II -15 AA. Reduction in State Tax Increment Financing Aid .................... II -15 EXHIBIT II -A Boundary Map of Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 ..... II -A -1 EXHIBIT II -B Cashflow Analysis and Base Value Analysis ................. II -13-1 EXHIBIT II -C Data on Qualifications as a Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District ............ ............................... II -C -1 EXHIBIT II -D Copy of the Special Act ............................... II -D -1 EXHIBIT II -E Prior Planned Improvements ............................. II -E -1 SECTION REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 Subsection 1.1. Definitions. The terms defined below shall, for purposes of this Redevelopment Plan, have the meanings herein specified, unless the context otherwise specifically requires: "Authority" means the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority, a public body corporate and politic duly created by the City pursuant to the EDA Act. "City" means the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. "City Council" means the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, also referred to as the governing body. "Comprehensive Plan" means the City's Comprehensive Plan which contains the objectives, use development, redevelopment policies, tandards and programs to guide public and private land p P , P g and preservation of all lands and water within the City. "County" means the County of Hennepin, Minnesota. "County Board" means the County Board of Hennepin County, Minnesota. "EDA Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.090 to 469.108, inclusive, as amended. "Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project means the redevelopment project established by the Brooklyn Center Housing and Redevelopment Authority pursuant to the HRA Act and EDA Act. "Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1" means the housing development and redevelopment project hereby established pursuant to the HRA Act and the EDA Act, incorporating the former Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project and Housing Development Project No. 01. "Housing Development Project No. 01" (also the "Brookwood Project" or "Brutger Proposal ") means the housing development project established by the Brooklyn Center Housing and Redevelopment Authority pursuant to the HRA Act. "HRA Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended. "Municipality" means any city, however organized as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.125 Subdivision 2. "Project Area" means the Housing Development and Redevelopment Project as geographically described in Section I Subsection 1.9 of the Redevelopment Plan. -1 "Special Act" means 1994 Minnesota Laws, Chapter 587, Article 9, Section 14, allowing the City of Brooklyn Center to create a redevelopment tax increment financing district in which 15 percent of the revenues generated from tax increment in any year is deposited in a housing development account. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "Tax Increment Financing Act" means the statutory provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through •469.179, inclusive, as amended. "Tax Increment Bonds" means any obligation or revenue tax increment bonds issued and to be issued by the City to finance the public costs associated with Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 as stated in the Redevelopment Plan and in the Tax Increment Financing Plan for a Tax Increment Financing District within Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1. The term "Tax Increment Bonds" shall also include any obligations issued to refund the Tax Increment Bonds. "Tax Increment Financing District" means any tax increment financing district presently established or to be established in the future in Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1. "Tax Increment Financing Plan" means the respective Tax Increment Plan for each Tax Increment Financing District presently located or to be located in the future within the Housing Development and Redevelopment Project. Subsection 1.2. Statement and Finding of Public Purpose. In July, 1985, the Brooklyn Center Housing and Redevelopment Authority established the Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project and, from time to time, has modified the Redevelopment Plan for the Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project, has established a tax increment financing district, and has issued revenue and general obligation bonds to assist various housing, development and redevelopment projects. In April, 1983, the Brooklyn Center Housing and Redevelopment Authority established the Housing Development Project No. 01 and, from time to time, has modified the Housing Development Project Plan for Housing Development Project No. 01 to include the Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project, has established a tax increment financing district, and has issued general obligation bonds to assist in various housing projects. On August 24, 1987, the City Council authorized the establishment of the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority. Pursuant to Brooklyn Center City Council Resolution No. 87- 170, the Authority has and may exercise all of the powers conferred by law upon a Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City. The Authority's potential scope of activities, as described in the EDA Act and the HRA Act, includes actions such as ownership of housing, general and limited partnerships, operation of housing, and funding mechanisms which are not clearly defined in the Municipal Development District Act. The Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority has been authorized by the City of Brooklyn Center to carry out all powers of and administer all projects initiated by the Brooklyn Center HRA. 1 -2 On April 25, 1994, the City Council and Authority expanded the geographic boundaries of the Earle rown Farm Redevelopment Project to include Housing Development Project No. 01 and other properties and provided additional (housing) powers. The modified redevelopment project is renamed Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1. Activities described in previous amendments to the Redevelopment Project and Housing Development Project No. 01 remain valid unless specifically noted in the modified Redevelopment Plan. The Authority intends to use the powers allowed under the EDA Act and HRA Act to promote development and redevelopment throughout the City and to pool resources in order to reduce financial barriers to providing decent housing and employment opportunities. The Authority has found that there is a need for development and redevelopment within the Project Area based upon the following conditions: 1. The Project Area contains numerous parcels containing buildings or improvements which, by reason of dilapidation, obsolescence, overcrowding, faulty arrangement or design, lack of ventilation, light and sanitary facilities, excessive land coverage, deleterious land use or obsolete layout, and a combination of these and other factors in detrimental to the safety, health, morals or welfare of the community. 2. There is a shortage of decent, safe, and sanitary housing for persons of low and moderate income and their families, as such income is determined by the Authority. 3. The Project Area suffers from a lack of necessary streets, utilities and site improvements essential to preparing and making sites available for meaningful development. 4. The requires Project Area active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce through government action for the purpose of preventing the emergence and continuation of blight and the occurrence of conditions requiring redevelopment. 5. The Project Area contains vacant, unused, underused and inappropriately used land. 6. It is found that there is a need for development and redevelopment in areas of the City to provide employment opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the state. Further evidence of the Authority's findings are listed in a number of documents prepared by or on behalf of the Authority. These documents include: 1. A survey conducted by an individual at the University of Minnesota in 1981 for the City of Brooklyn Center indicated residents supporting 1 -3 the preservation of the Earle Brown Farm site and the City taking an active role in doing so. 2. A Housing Implementation Plan prepared by Publicorp, Inca finds that, in looking at the City's housing market, the City should do the following: • Maintain and preserve its housing stock while developing or assisting in providing opportunities to construct new housing. • Develop a strategy which addresses both the single family and multifamily segments of the City's housing stock. • Include components in the strategy which address both traditional housing programs and tenant services and management assistance. • Work with the Metropolitan Council in development of a regional housing policy. 3. Further evidence of the Authority's findings is listed in a document prepared on behalf of the Authority prepared by the Maxfield Research Group, Inc. The document is called "The Brooklyn Center Housing Market: A Study of Trends and Their Impact on the Community, dated May 1989. This study evaluates the current housing situation in the City and looks at demographic trends and other facts which will impact the City's housing market in the future. 4. In 1994, the City of Brooklyn Center requested the Maxfield Research Group to submit proposals on the potential for retail and senior housing for two redevelopment areas. The first proposal would be a market analysis of senior housing planned for the Willow Lane area; the second proposal would assess the market for retail development in the 69th and Brooklyn Boulevard redevelopment area. Therefore, the Authority has determined to exercise its authority to develop a program for improving the Project Area, to provide impetus for private development and redevelopment, to provide decent housing to residents, to maintain and increase employment, to provide infrastructure to serve citizens and employees of the City, to utilize existing land for potential redevelopment and to provide other facilities as are outlined in the Redevelopment Plan. The Authority has also determined that proposed developments to be assisted or owned by the Authority would not occur solely through private investment in the foreseeable future. The Authority finds that the welfare of the City as well as the State of Minnesota requires active promotion, attraction, encouragement and redevelopment of economically sound industry and commerce to carry out its stated public purpose objectives. 1 -4 The Authority has also determined that any tax increment financing plans to be modified or proposed herein will be consistent with the Redevelopment Plan; and that the tax increment financing plans will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Project Area by private enterprise. Subsection 1.3. Statutory Authority. The Authority established Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursuant to the EDA Act and HRA Act. Pursuant to Section 469.175, Subd. 4, the expansion of the Project Area constitutes a modification of the tax increment financing plans for each tax increment financing district in the Project Area. The Authority will comply will all procedures for such modification in accordance with the TIF Act. Subsection 1.4. Statement of Objectives See section on Goals and Objectives as found on pages 3 -5 of the Modified Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Plan for the Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project as adopted on July 22, 1985 v and modified on April 9, 1990. The general goals and objectives as found in the aforementioned documents are listed below: A. To provide decent, safe and sanitary housing for persons of low and moderate income. B. To provide governmental assistance to eliminate slum and blight. C. To provide- an on -going benefit to the residents of Brooklyn Center and those who may frequent the area. D. To arrive at development on and adjacent to the Farm Site that is appropriate to the locational setting of the Farm site. E. To arrive at a rehabilitation and re-use of the Earle Brown Farm site that is economically viable and/or accomplishes public goals at minimum public expense. F. To improve the aesthetic character of the district for both automobile travelers and pedestrians. G. To increase the amount of land available for high density residential development. (This statement, however, should not be interpreted to preclude the use of such lands for an appropriately structured commercial development such as office buildings.) H. To consider traffic needs and issues. As amended on April 25, 1994, the Authority seeks to achieve the following additional objectives: I. To enhance the tax base of the City. 1 -5 J. To provide maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City, for development by private enterprise. K. To better utilize vacant or underdeveloped land. L. To attract new businesses. M. To acquire blighted or deteriorated residential property for rehabilitation or clearance and redevelopment. N. To develop housing opportunities for market segments underserved in the City, including housing for the disabled and elderly. As amended November 21, 1994: In addition to the above - identified general objectives, the Authority seeks to facilitate comprehensive redevelopment of the area known as Willow /252 Area, as shown on the map attached as Exhibit A hereto. Specifically, the Authority finds that certain vacant parcels in the western portion of the Willow /252 are underutilized, and that development of such parcels for commercial use will prevent the emergence of blight and will complement anticipated housing redevelopment in the eastern portion of the Willow /252 Area. The Authority anticipates that housing redevelopment in the Willow /252 Area will in turn stimulate and support commercial enterprises in that area. Subsection 1.5. Environmental Controls. The environmental controls to be applied in connection with the execution of Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 shall consist of the applicable ordinances of the Municipality and the applicable provisions of the Minnesota Statutes. Subsection 1.6. Proposed Reuse of Property Specific proposals for reuse of property are as set forth in the TIF Plans for each TIF district, or may be described in amendments to the Redevelopment Plan. Subsection 1.7. Administration and Maintenance of Housing Development and Redevelopment Project. See Section on Project Administration as found on page 8 and Maintenance of the Project Area as found on page 9 of the Redevelopment Plan for the Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project as adopted on July 22, 1985 and amended on April 9, 1990. Maintenance and operation of the public improvements will be the responsibility of the City Manager or the Executive Director of the Authority who shall serve as Administrator of the Housing Development and Redevelopment Project. Each year the Administrator will submit to the Authority the maintenance and operation budget for the following year. The Administrator will administer the Housing Development and Redevelopment Project pursuant to the provisions of the HRA Act and the EDA Act; provided, however, that such powers may only 1 -6 be exercised at the direction of the Authority. No action taken by the Administrator pursuant to the above mentioned powers shall be effective without authorization by the Authority. Subsection 1.8. Relocation ' See Section on Relocation Program as found on page 9 of the Redevelopment Plan for the Earle and amended on April 9, 1990. ent Project as adopted on July Brown Farm Redevelopment � p 1 Y 22, 1985 Complete relocation services are available pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws. The Authority accepts as binding its obligations under federal, state, and local law for relocation and will administer relocation services for families, individuals and businesses to be displaced by public action if such services are requested or necessary. Prior to approval by the Authority of any development or redevelopment plan, it shall be satisfied that there is a feasible method for the temporary relocation of families to be displaced from the project area and that there are available or will be provided, in the Project Area or in other areas not less desirable in regard to public utilities and public commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families displaced from the project area, decent, safe and sanitary dwellings equal in number of such displaced families. Subsection 1.9. Boundaries of Housing Development and Redevelopment Proie No 1. The description of Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 is found on a map in Exhibit I -A -1 and as outlined in the following legal description: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 ment project area for the Cit The modified redevelop p � h' of Brooklyn Center shall consist of the entire City of Brooklyn Center excluding the following described property: Beginning at a point at the southeast corner of lot 13, block auditor's subdivision No. 310 g g Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to road, thence westerly to a point at the southwest corner of lot 13, block auditor's subdivision No. 310 Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to road. Thenc e northerly right-of-way ht -of -wa line of West River Road to the center line of Y y alon t easte g he g 72nd Avenue North. Thence easterly to the center line of Dallas Road. Thence northerly along the center line of Dallas Road to the intersection of 73rd Avenue North and the northern corporate limits of the City of Brooklyn Center. Thence easterly to the Mississippi River and the easterly corporate limits of the City of Brooklyn Center. Subsection 1.10. Parcels To Be Acquired or Mav Be Acquired in Whole or In Part Within the Housing Development and Redevelopment Proiect. The City may acquire any parcel located in Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1. As amended November 21, 1994: Specifically, the Authority intends to acquire by negotiation or the exercise of its powers of eminent domain, any parcel needed in order to accomplish redevelopment of the 1 -7 Willow /252 Area, including without limitation the property described as Tract C, Registered land Survey No. 1377, Hennepin County Minnesota, Property I.D. No. 35- 119 -21 -0003. Subsection 1.11. Modification of Redevelopment Plan and /or Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1. See section on Procedure for Making Modifications in an Approved Municipal Development District as found on page 7 of the Redevelopment Plan for the Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Project as adopted on July 22, 1985 and amended on April 9, 1990. The Redevelopment Plan for Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 was modified by the Brooklyn Center City Council on April 25, 1994; November 21, 1994; and December 19, 1994. 1 -8 EXHIBIT I -A -1. MAP OF PROJECT I I I -1 t .Nr:r IKI. vt ro,nr - a"TT' nu \, a'v SjS % /l• cat �_ .�• ai w il•arN -�__ — w w,i.e ri Mot tP = a :r� --- -�� iII vT �S. TTR Jfr� O w eutr e � iii O w u, xi b - a l0 In7FT - nm ! ri eat rTFl • Z "f, +wt� __. 1± = TF.7•i ra vt � ' - 7t'F• �fiIvLA r Tta miv dA - dr � 11 P flr Follow t'nri1A - — 1v A r w Hr Iwlr 3 ' e� r •, _�� ._... -• - -TIFIT - 'A 77717 - — —Y T+'TiFi1r o � W INr rr7 qa trr v -MmIrM ,.a� -- -- It' w Hr , og77 ` v rotrrf la ! 1( _ _ �/ east _ P 1 q• r -A t • t7 0 rr+la) --- -- ---- IrrG " ]AT W s , _ — CL oat "�r Wit' rN ai' RP riaof ev '"—� 17T7vtni eal w fwv ,NI Q: "s,• �eeti- r _. - a Tla tTtr f -- LU /� 7 r tf CL /L rC-. " Pt wlltt f - lm - w 1 a i;� .T.'Jt►n —' C_S 0 Q W ` — V w M . r.ayr,t •� ottt � - jii sl �` '+ _ � �),• rats OO W G eon s-lw•— rarxTr_ p �` � �` r w f•• vrt,t � 04D 0 flr e111 I r C l �` l '•1 / �\ I r l= III P91 00 - W r u+ ntlt K h O w f.• w•etr /K • . � M �i• ` T1fD - T�7t� t �� - V L Q F" 0 r r MI" Z W /1/f eat L Cd frvr" it n F t 0 .c. w i,. tagr r.,rgK v � t @ f - - ` - li w a M INX ext ! !' !• !• 'min e ra.. AIIAII T' w noow s ttiR: C � 7 i1 j - C.. V w I" � t O r Nr �a : � `� � " a r r t !' � � � - R7AV r tO p el Y �� 3 t � r7v -aa- w,.,� • � * i y Y • � e - ""� W " N• • r r -�� Q M //! me • E �r w • rar s TllsaT -; j / hr '~ •B: -e"J r ),,,v mi m �'' �''. �rxA yr r-f ,� • �p r ,{ S V eat 71 .rr w7.: +r•lal y y Z w N• - "ar" �, wt'T.'�r �..1�• II ' � 7 . __��._ t •7 .+. rf.r aoi U 'i TT 3mr_ ''Sta Y !- y __ a F 7R7 M1/ I ..� 'ra ---- -- (^ T � _ Y " = ' r ". c� a Is, A�,.�_� —. _ ' �_�;• _ t eet/ - .T,ara _ _.TTlr7r, y "� 1 O r A•'avwq S Tw � l1 m W � "AT SA? ATa Ta�3 t • w 7 a7TE.r�Te i ,• _ . . ,rsiti7l n.,� �vf _-- -__ n %S /M7 re,lY y n - -a- w IF _ n rr;�. a ty iIIt7T7 = 'it rrU .ro • O'1?Ia3 fIIt7TT � _ ul ,t : It i. —11 "" f., on �/. �� �14��3 �rl t �r tlmarr TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 03 A. STATUTORY AUTHORITY Within the City of Brooklyn Center (the "City") there exist areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or redevelopment to occur. To this end, on August 24, 1987, the City Council established the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority (the "Authority") and transferred the control, authority and operation of certain projects of the City and of the Brooklyn Center HRA. The City faces various existing land use problems that require corrective action by the City or Authority before development by private enterprise becomes financially feasible or desirable. The Authority and City are authorized to establish a tax increment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended, and the Special Act, to assist in financing public costs related to this project. Tax increments are derived only from the increased amount of taxes which are paid on a parcel of property after the construction of a new structure on the parcel. Tax increment districts encompass the parcels from which tax increments are paid for a period of time. Below is the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Plan ") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 ( "District No. 03 "). Other relevant information is contained in the Redevelopment Plan for Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1, originally adopted on April 22, 1985 and since been modified. A modification of the Redevelopment Plan is contemplated in the Tax Increment Plan. Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 includes the area proposed for District No. 03. The Authority or the City reserves the right to approve all or a portion of the property as proposed to be included in District No. 03 on the date of the first public hearing, December 19, 1994. B. STATEMENT OF OBIECTIVES District No. 03 is a scattered site district with three sites consisting of 221 parcels of land and adjacent and internal rights -of -way of which 174 parcels contain existing houses and structures. Site A (Brooklyn Boulevard/69th Area) currently consists of 75 parcels of land and adjacent and internal right -of ways of which 67 parcels contain existing houses and structures. Present plans for the new development on the site include apartments for seniors, a medical clinic, retail, and auto dealer expansion. Site B (Brookdale Area) currently consists of 72 parcels of land and adjacent and internal right -of ways of which 62 parcels contain existing houses and structures. Present plans for the new development on the site include expansion and remodeling of Brookdale and a grocery store. Site C (Willow /252 Area) currently consists of 74 parcels of land and adjacent and internal right -of ways of which 53 parcels contain existing houses and structures. Present plans for the new development on the site include retail facilities, hotels, a restaurant, and single family housing. i I I -1 District No. 03 is expected to achieve many of the objectives set forth in the Redevelopment Plan regard to land use. These objectives e include: S 1 1. To enhance the tax base of the City. 2. To provide maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City, for development by private enterprise. 3. To better utilize vacant or underdeveloped land. I 4. To attract new businesses. 5. To acquire blighted or deteriorated residential property for rehabilitation or clearance and redevelopment. 6. To develop housing opportunities for market segments underserved in the City, including housing for the disabled and elderly. See Exhibit II -C for the data on the qualifications of the scattered site redevelopment tax increment financing istrict. c in g C. HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OVERVIEW 1. Property to be Acquired - Selected property located within District No. 03 may be acquired by the City or the Authority and is further described in Subsection F of this Plan. 2. Relocation - Complete relocation services are available pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws. 3. Upon approval of the developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary legal requirements, the City or the Authority may sell to the developer selected properties it may acquire within District No. 03. 4. The City or the Authority may perform or provide for some or all necessary acquisition, relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public streets work within District No. 03. 5. District No. 03 contains mixed zoned property. All development in the area will conform to applicable state and local codes and ordinances. D. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IN DISTRICT NO. 03 District No. 03 encompasses the parcels and all adjacent and interior right -of -ways as identified below: 11 -2 SITE A (Brooklyn Boulevard/69th Area) 27- 119 -21 -33 -0005 27- 119 -21 -33 -0063 27- 119 -21 -33 -0007 27- 119 -21 -33 -0064 27- 119 -21 -33 -0008 27- 119 -21 -33 -0065 27- 119 -21 -33 -0010 27- 119 -21 -33 -0066 27- 119 -21 -33 -0011 27- 119 -21 -33 -0067 27- 119 -21 -33 -0012 27- 119 -21 -33 -0069 27- 119 -21 -33 -0013 27- 119 -21 -33 -0080 27- 119 -21 -33 -0014 27- 119 -21 -33 -0099 27- 119 -21 -33 -0016 27- 119 -21 -34 -0008 27- 119 -21 -33 -0017 28- 119 -21 -41 -0124 27- 119 -21 -33 -0018 28- 119 -21 -41 -0125 27- 119 -21 -33 -0019 28- 119 -21 -44 -0001 27- 119 -21 -33 -0020 34- 119 -21 -21 -0003 27- 119 -21 -33 -0021 34- 119 -21 -21 -0004 27- 119 -21 -33 -0022 34- 119 -21 -21 -0005 27- 119 -21 -33 -0023 34- 119 -21 -21 -0006 27- 119 -21 -33 -0024 34- 119 -21 -21 -0007 27- 119 -21 -33 -0025 34- 119 -21 -21 -0008 27- 119 -21 -33 -0026 34- 119 -21 -21 -0009 27- 119 -21 -33 -0027 34- 119 -21 -21 -0020 27- 119 -21 -33 -0028 34- 119 -21 -21 -0021 27- 119 -21 -33 -0046 34- 119 -21 -21 -0022 27- 119 -21 -33 -0047 34- 119 -21 -21 -0023 27- 119 -21 -33 -0048 34- 119 -21 -21 -0027 27- 119 -21 -33 -0049 34- 119 -21 -21 -0028 27- 119 -21 -33 -0050 34- 119 -21 -21 -0029 27- 119 -21 -33 -0051 34- 119 -21 -21 -0030 27- 119 -21 -33 -0052 34- 119 -21 -21 -0031 27- 119 -21 -33 -0053 34- 119 -21 -22 -0007 27- 119 -21 -33 -0054 34- 119 -21 -22 -0008 27- 119 -21 -33 -0056 34- 119 -21 -22 -0009 27- 119 -21 -33 -0057 34- 119 -21 -22 -0010 27- 119 -21 -33 -0058 34- 119 -21 -22 -0011 27- 119 -21 -33 -0059 34- 119 -21 -22 -0012 27- 119 -21 -33 -0060 34- 119 -21 -22 -0015 27- 119 -21 -33 -0061 34- 119 -21 -22 -0016 27- 119 -21 -33 -0062 34- 119 -21 -22 -0017 34- 119 -21 -22 -0018 SITE B (Brookdale Area) 02- 118 -21 -13 -0024 02- 118 -21 -13 -0029 02- 118 -21 -13 -0025 02- 118 -21 -23 -0015 02- 118 -21 -13 -0026 02- 118 -21 -23 -0016 02- 118 -21 -13 -0027 02- 118 -21 -23 -0017 02- 118 -21 -13 -0028 02- 118 -21 -23 -0019 11 -3 02- 118 -21 -23 -0021 03- 118 -21 -41 -0015 02- 118 -21 -23 -0022 03- 118 -21-41 -0016 02- 118 -21 -24 -0019 03- 118 -21 -41 -0017 02- 118 -21 -31 -0055 03- 118 -21 -41 -0018 02- 118 -21 -31 -0056 03- 118 -21 -41 -0019 02- 118 -21 -32 -0008 03- 118 -21 -41 -0020 02- 118 -21 -32 -0009 03- 118 -21 -41 -0021 02- 118 -21 -32 -0010 03- 118 -21 -41 -0022 02- 118 -21 -32 -0011 03- 118 -21 -44 -0026 02- 118 -21 -32 -0012 03- 118 -21 -44 -0030 02- 118 -21 -42 -0004 03- 118 -21 -44 -0032 02-118-21-42-0031 03- 118 -21 -44 -0033 02- 118 -21 -42 -0032 03- 118 -21 -44 -0034 02- 118 -21 -42 -0033 10- 118 -21 -11 -0010 02- 118 -21 -42 -0034 10- 118 -21 -11 -0011 02- 118 -21 -42 -0035 10- 118 -21 -12 -0056 03- 118 -21 -13 -0011 10-118-21-12-0057 03- 118 -21- 14-0001 10- 118 -21 -13 -0003 03- 118 -21 -14 -0019 10- 118 -21 -13 -0006 03- 118 -21 -14 -0021 10- 118 -21 -13 -0042 03- 118 -21- 14-0022 10- 118 -21 -13 -0051 03- 118 -21- 14-0024 10- 118 -21 -13 -0059 03- 118 -21 -14 -0026 10- 118 -21 -13 -0060 03- 118 -21 -14 -0030 10- 118 -21 -13 -0061 03- 118 -21 -14 -0032 10- 118 -21 -13 -0062 03- 118 -21 -14 -0033 10- 118 -21 -13 -0063 03- 118 -21 -14 -0034 10- 118 -21 -13 -0064 03- 118 -21 -41 -0001 10- 118 -21 -13 -0065 03- 118 -21 -41 -0002 10- 118 -21 -13 -0066 03- 118 -21 -41 -0013 10- 118 -21 -13 -0067 03- 118 -21 -41 -0014 10- 118 -21 -13 -0068 SITE C (Willow Lane/252 Area) 35-119-21-13-0006 35- 119 -21 -22 -0010 35- 119 -21 -13 -0011 35- 119 -21 -22 -0011 35- 119 -21 -13 -0012 35- 119 -21 -22 -0051 35- 119 -21 -13 -0013 35- 119 -21 -22 -0052 35- 119 -21 -13 -0019 35- 119 -21 -23 -0001 35- 119 -21 -13 -0020 35- 119 -21 -23 -0002 35-119-21-14-0008 35- 119 -21 -24 -0003 5- 119 -21 -14 -0011 35- 119 -21 -24 -0004 - 119 -21 -22 -0005 35- 119 -21 -24 -0005 35-119-21-22-0007 35- 119 -21 -41 -0003 35- 119 -21 -22 -0008 35-119-21-41-0008 11 -4 35- 119 -21 -41 -0014 36- 119 -21 -24 -0046 35- 119 -21 -41 -0015 36- 119 -21 -24 -0047 35- 119 -21 -41 -0018 36- 119 -21 -31 -0011 35- 119 -21 -41 -0019 36- 119 -21 -31 -0014 35- 119 -21 -42 -0003 36- 119 -21 -31 -0016 35- 119 -21 -42 -0006 36- 119 -21 -31 -0017 35- 119 -21 -42 -0010 36- 119 -21 -31 -0045 36- 119 -21 -13 -0008 36- 119 -21 -32 -0002 36- 119 -21 -13 -0009 36- 119 -21 -32 -0006 36- 119 -21 -13 -0010 36- 119 -21 -32 -0010 36- 119 -21 -13 -0011 36- 119 -21 -32 -0013 36- 119 -21 -13 -0026 36- 119 -21 -32 -0056 36- 119 -21 -13 -0027 36- 119 -21 -32 -0059 36- 119 -21 -13 -0029 36- 119 -21 -32 -0065 36- 119 -21 -13 -0030 36- 119 -21 -32 -0066 36- 119 -21 -13 -0031 36- 119 -21 -42 -0007 36- 119 -21 -13 -0032 36- 119 -21-42 -0008 36- 119 -21 -13 -0033 36- 119 -21 -42 -0009 36- 119 -21 -13 -0079 36- 119 -21 -42 -0010 36-119-21-13-0080 36- 119 -21 -42 -0011 36-119-21-13-0106 36-119-21-42-0012 36- 119 -21 -13 -0107 36- 119 -21 -42 -0013 36- 119 -21 -13 -0108 36- 119 -21 -42 -0015 36- 119 -21 -13 -0110 36- 119 -21 -42 -0016 36- 119 -21 -13 -0111 36- 119 -21 -42 -0017 36- 119 -21 -13 -0112 36- 119 -21 -42 -0018 The City or the Authority reserves a right to approve all or a portion of the area of the parcels listed as designation for District No. 03. See the map in Exhibit II -A for further information on the location of District No. 03. E. CLASSIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT The City and the Authority, in determining the need to create a tax increment financing district in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 to 469.179, as amended, inclusive, finds that District No. 03 to be established is a redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10 as defined below: (a) "Redevelopment district" means a type of tax increment financing district consisting of a project, or portions of a project, within which the authority finds by resolution that one of the following conditions, reasonably distributed throughout the district, exists: (1) parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area in the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or other improvements and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance; or II -5 (2) The property consists of vacant, unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used railyards, rail storage facilities or excessive or vacated railroad rights -of -way. (b) For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs or other similar reliable evidence. if the evidence supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is not disqualified as structurally substandard, the municipality may make such a determination without an interior inspection or an independent, expert appraisal of the cost of repair and rehabilitation of the building... (c) For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements until 15 percent of the area of the parcel contains improvements. The 221 parcels have been investigated by City and Authority staff and consultants and each of three non - contiguous area of District No. 03 have been found to meet all requirements of a redevelopment district. A complete report of the findings is located in Exhibit II -C of the Plan. District No. 03 is created pursuant to the Tax Increment Financing Act and the Special Act. The Authority intends to implement the Plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Special Act. F. PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED The City or Authority may acquire any parcel within District No. 03 including interior street and railway right -of -ways. G. ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimate of public costs associated with District No. 03 are outlined in the following line item budget: 11-6 Estimate of Public Costs Qualified Costs Land Acquisition a. Commercial $7,000,000 b. Industrial 8,000,000 Public Improvements 4500,000 a. Streetscape b. Public Works /Stormwater 3,500,000 Demolition and Relocation 0 Site Preparation 0 Administrative, Legal, Engineering, and Consulting Fees 2,900,000 Housing Development Account 5,000,000 Property Acquisition of Multi- family Units Rehabilitation of Multi - Family Units Acquisition of Blighted Single Family Housing Rehabilitation of Blighted Senior Housing Contingency 1,000,000 Total Estimated Project Costs: $31,900,000 Any funds to be expended for off -site improvements outside the boundaries of District No. 03, but within the boundaries of Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1, would be less than 25 percent of total tax increment generated by District No. 03, including administrative costs, provide that tax increment deposited in the housing development account may be spent on eligible housing activities located anywhere in the City, as provided in the Special Act. H. ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF LOAN /BONDED INDEBTEDNESS It is anticipated that the City or Authority may issue a revenue bond, general obligation bond, or other type of obligation in one or. more series to finance costs public costs. The original principal amount of all indebtedness is not expected to exceed $29,000,000 with additional increments to be paid to capitalized and other interest determined at the time of issuance. I. SOURCES OF REVENUE The major source of revenue to be used to finance public costs associated with the public development projects in Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 is tax increment n ' ri generated as a result of the taxation of the land and improvements in District No. 03. Tax increment financing refers to a funding technique that utilizes increases in valuation and the property taxes attributable to new development to finance, or assist in the financing of public development costs. Additional sources of revenue may include but are not limited to investment income and land sales. This does not preclude the City, the Authority, or the developer from using other funds, at its discretion, to pay such costs. 11 -7 I J. ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.174, Subdivision 7 and Section 469.177, Subdivision 1, the Original Net Tax Capacity (OTC) for the District No. 03 is based on the value placed on the property by the assessor in 1994 for taxes payable 1995. The tax capacity as certified is estimated to be $8,260,403 for taxes payable in 1995. At the time that the construction is completed, the original tax capacity is expected to be $12,960,403. The original local tax rate for District No. 03 will be the tax rate for taxes payable in 1995 estimated for purposes of the Plan to be the 1994 rates of 138.873 for that part of District No. 03 that is located in Independent School District No. 279, 136.488 for that part of District No. 03 that is located in Independent School District No. 281, 128.439 for that part of District No. 03 that is located in Independent School District No. 11, and 128.701 for that part of District No. 03 that is located in Independent School District No. 286. Each year, the Hennepin County Department of Property Tax and Public Records will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total tax capacity of District No. 03 to calculate the tax increment payable to the City and the Authority. In any year in which there is an increase in total tax capacity in the tax increment financing district above the annual percentage of annual increase, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total tax capacity in District No. 03 declines below the original tax capacity, no additional valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the OTC was certified, the amount the OTC has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. change in tax exempt status of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court- ordered abatements; 4. change in the use of the property and classification; or 5. change in state law governing class rates. K. AMOUNT OF CAPTURED TAX CAPACITY Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 Subdivision 4 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 2, the estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity (CTC) of District No. 03, upon completion of all phases of the project, will annually approximate $4,700,000. The City requests 100 percent of the available increase in tax capacity for repayment of debt and current expenditures. The original tax capacity and project tax capacity are estimated at current market values and class rates to be the total amount when all development is in place and uses of the property have changed. Estimated Project Tax Capacity $12,960,403 less Original Tax Capacity 8,260,403 Estimated Captured Tax Capacity 4 11 -8 L. DURATION OF THE DISTRICT Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 1, the duration of District No. 03 must be indicated within the Plan. The duration of District No. 03 will be 25 years from payment of the first tax increment expected in 1996. Thus, it is estimated that District No. 03, including any modifications of the Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate at the end of the year 2021. The City and the Authority does reserve the right to decertify District No. 03 prior to the legally required date. M. ESTIMATED IMPACT ON OTHER TAXING IURISDICTIONS The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes construction would have occurred without the creation of District No. 03. If the construction is a result of tax increment financing, the impact is $0 to other entities. Notwithstanding the fact that the fiscal impact on the other taxing jurisdictions is $0 due to the fact that the construction would not have occurred without the assistance of the city, the following estimated impact of District No. 03 would be as follows if the "but for" test was not met: IMPACT ON TAX BASE ENTITY'S % OF CAPTURED TOTAL NET CAPTURED TAX CAPACITY ENTITY TAX CAPACITY TAX CAPACITY TO ENTITY TOTAL Hennepin County 928,379,673 4,700,000 21.80% City of Brooklyn Center 21,563,017 4,700,000 0.51% School District No. 279 (Site A) 67,083,479 1,103,681 1.65% School District No. 281 (Site B) 70,036,202 1,925,717 2.75% School District No. 11 (Site C) 20,172,541 123,617 0.61% School District No. 286 (Site C) 7,140,511 1,546,985 21.66% 11-9 IMPACT ON TAX RATES CURRENT CAPTURED POTENTIAL ENTITY TAX RATE TAX CAPACITY TAXES Hennepin County 37.441 4,700,000 1,759,727 City of Brooklyn Center* 27.603 4,700,000 1,297,341 Other 7.043 4,700,000 331,021 School District No. 279 (Site A) 66.786 1,103,681 737,104 School District No. 281 (Site B) 64.401 1,925,717 1,240,181 School District No. 11 (Site C) 57.161 123,617 70,661 School District No. 286 (Site C) 56.614 1,546,985 331,021 TOTAL IN ISD 279 138.873 1,103,681 1,532,715 TOTAL IN ISD 281 136.488 1,925,717 2,628,372 TOTAL IN ISD 11 128.439 123,617 151,066 TOTAL IN ISD 286 128.701 1,546,985 1,990,985 TOTAL 6,303,139 Includes HRA tax rate. The estimates listed above display captured tax capacity when all construction is completed. The tax rates are payable 1994 figures and tax capacities are the payable 1995 figures for all jurisdictions. District No. 03 will be certified under rates for tax year payable 1995. In addition, the impacts on School District Nos. 279, 281, 11, and 286 do not include the effect of state aids for education upon .school district funding. N. MODIFICATIONS OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 4, any reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of the project or tax increment financing district, increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, including a determination to capitalize interest on debt if that determination was not a part of the original plan, or to increase or decrease the amount of interest on the debt to be capitalized, increase in the portion of the captured tax capacity to be retained by the City or Authority, increase in total estimated tax increment expenditures or designation of additional property to be acquired by the City or Authority shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval of the original plan. The geographic area of a tax increment financing district may be reduced, but shall not be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the original tax capacity by the county auditor or by approximately December, 1999. Modifications to the District No. 03, in the form of a budget modification or a expansion of the boundaries, will be recorded in this Plan. II -10 O. LIMITATION ON ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174,. Subdivision 14 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subdivision 3, administrative expenses means all expenditures of an authority other than amounts paid for the purchase of land or amounts paid to contractors or others providing materials and services, including architectural and engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the district, relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing or businesses located in the district or amounts used to pay interest on fund a reserve for or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to Section 469.178. Administrative expenses include amounts aid for services P Y provided b bond counsel, fiscal consultants, and P P planning or economic development consultants. No tax increment shall be used to pay any administrative expenses for a project which exceed ten percent of the total tax increment expenditures authorized by the tax increment financing plan or the total tax increment expenditures for the project, whichever is less. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subdivision 4h, tax increments may be used to pay for the county's actual administrative expenses incurred in connection with District No. 03. The county may require payment of those expenses by February 15 of the year following the year the expenses were incurred. P. DURATION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subdivision 1, no tax increment shall be paid to an authority three years from the date of certification by the County Auditor unless within the three -year period (1) bonds have been issued pursuant to Section 469.178, or in aid of a project pursuant to any other law, except revenue bonds issued pursuant to Chapter 469.152 to 469.165, prior to the effective date of the Act; or (2) the authority has acquired property within the district; or (3) the authority has constructed or caused to be constructed public improvements within the district ... " The City or Authority must therefore issue bonds, or acquire property, or construct or cause public improvements in District No. 03 by approximately December, 1997. Q. LIMITATION ON QUALIFICATION OF PROPERTY IN TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NOT SUBIECT TO IMPROVEMENT Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subdivision 6, if, after four years from the date of certification of the original tax capacity of the tax increment financing district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.177, no demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of property or other site preparation, including improvement of a street adjacent to a parcel but not installation of utility service including sewer or water systems, has been commenced on a parcel located within a tax increment financing district by the authority or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel and the original tax capacity of that parcel shall be excluded from the original tax capacity of the tax increment financing district. If the authority or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences demolition, rehabilitation or renovation or other site preparation on that parcel including improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, the authority shall certify to the county auditor in the annual disclosure report that the activity has commenced. The county auditor shall certify the tax capacity thereof as most recently certified by the commissioner of revenue and add 11 -11 it to the original tax capacity of the tax increment financing district. The county auditor must enforce the provisions of this subdivision... For purposes of this subdivision, qualified improvements are limited to (1) construction or opening of a new street, (2) relocation of a street, and (3) substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. R. LIMITATION ON THE USE OF TAX INCREMENT Pursuant to Minnesota Statues, 469.176, Subd. 4, at least 90 percent of the revenues derived from tax increments from a redevelopment district must be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation of redevelopment districts under section 469.174, Subdivision 10. These costs include acquiring properties containing structurally substandard buildings or improvements, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development, demolition of structures, clearing of the land and installation of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site. The revenues shall be used to finance or otherwise pay public redevelopment and housing development costs pursuant to the HRA Act. These revenues shall not be used to circumvent any levy limit law. No revenues derived from tax increment shall be used for the construction or renovation of a municipally owned building used primarily and regularlyfor conducting the business of the municipality; this provision shall not prohibit the use of revenues derived from tax increments for the construction or renovation of a parking structure, a commons area used as a public park or a facility used for social, recreational or conference purposes and not primarily for conducting the business of the municipality. For tax increment financing districts for which certification was requested after April 30, 1990, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.1763, Subdivisions 1 and 2, an amount equal to at least 75 percent of the revenue derived from tax increments from the district's parcels must be expended on activities in the district. Not withstanding the above limitations, the Special Act provides that 15 percent of the revenues generated from tax increment in any year from District No. 03 will be deposited in a housing development account.Such revenues may be expended anywhere in the City for certain eligible housing activities as set forth in the Special Act as further described in Section G of this Plan. S. NOTIFICATION OF PRIOR PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 4, the City has reviewed the area to be included in District No. 03 has listed the parcel number and added value in Exhibit II -E. The additional capacity to be added to the Original Tax Capacity due to prior planned improvements is T. EXCESS TAX INCREMENTS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subdivision 2, in any year in which the tax increment exceeds the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the tax increment plan, including the amount necessary to cancel any tax levy as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3, the authority shall use the excess amount to do any of the following: 1. prepay the outstanding bonds; 2. discharge the pledge of tax increment therefore; 3. pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bond; or II -12 4. return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in proportion to their tax capacity rate. U. REQUIREMENT FOR AGREEMENTS WITH THE DEVELOPER The City or Authority will review any Developer's proposal to determine its conformance with the Redevelopment Plan and with applicable municipal ordinances and codes. To facilitate this effort, the following documents may be requested for review and approval: site plan, construction, mechanical, and electrical system drawings, landscaping plan, grading and storm drainage plan, signage system plan, and any other drawings or narrative deemed necessary by the City or Authority to demonstrate the conformance of the development with city plans and ordinances. Land acquired by the City or Authority may be subject to a Contract for Sale upon disposition to the Developer. The general requirements to be imposed upon the developer by the Contract for Sale are: 1. To redevelop the land purchased in accordance with this development plan. 2. To commence and complete the building of improvements on the land within a reasonable period of time as determined by the City or Authority. 3. Not to resell the land before improvements are made without the prior consent of the City or Authority. 4. Not to discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, creed or national origin on the sale, lease, transfer or occupancy of the land purchased from the City or Authority. The requirements to be imposed upon the Developer and the City's or Authority's exact participation in the project will be negotiated as part of the Development Agreement between the City or the Authority and the Developer. V. ASSESSMENT AGREEMENTS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 8, the City or Authority may enter into an agreement in recordable form with the developer of property within the tax increment financing district which establishes a minimum market value of the land and completed improvements for the duration of the tax increment district. The assessment agreement shall be presented to the county assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land upon which the improvements are to be constructed and, so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appear, in the judgment of the assessor, to be a reasonable estimate, the assessor may certify the minimum market value agreement. W. ADMINISTRATION OF DISTRICT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE TAX INCREMENT ACCOUNT Administration of District No. 03 will be handled'by the City Manager or the Executive Director of the Authority. The tax increment received as a result of increases in the tax capacity of District No. 03 will be maintained in a special account separate from all other municipal accounts and expended only upon sanctioned municipal activities identified in the tax increment financing plan. Further, II -13 the administration will maintain a separate housing development account on its official books and records in accordance with the Special Act. X. FINANCIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivisions 6, and 6a; an authority must file an annual disclosure report for all tax increment financing districts with the Office of the State Auditor, the county board, school board, and Department of Revenue. Y. MUNICIPAL APPROVAL Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3, before or at the time of approval of the tax increment financing plan, the municipality shall make the following findings and shall set forth in writing the reasons and supporting facts for each determination. 1. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 is a redevelopment district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 10. District No. 03 consists of 221 parcels of property in three noncontiguous areas. Within each noncontiguous area, parcels consisting of more than 70 percent of the area are occupied by buildings and improvements. Buildings have been reviewed by city staff and consultants and more than 50 percent of the buildings within each noncontiguous area have been found to be structurally substandard. 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council and the Authority, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. Due to the high cost of redevelopment on parcels currently occupied by substandard buildings, the incompatible land uses at close proximity, and the cost of financing the proposed improvements, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. 3. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The site is appropriately zoned. The Tax Increment Financing Plan has been reviewed by the Planning Commission and been found to confirm to the general development plan of the City. 4. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 by private enterprise. The establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 will result in increased employment for the City, proper buffering between diverse land uses, and increased availability of safe and decent housing in the City. I1 -14 Z. COUNTY ROAD COSTS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 1a, the county board may require the authority to pay for all or part of the cost of county road improvements if the proposed development to be assisted by tax increment will, in the judgement of the county, substantially increase the use of county roads requiring construction of road improvements or other road costs and if the road improvements are not scheduled within the next five years under a capital improvement plan or other county plan. The improvements outlined in the Plan serve as notice to the county that the development of the retail facili ty will be assisted with tax increment. In the opinion of the City, the Authority, and consultants, the proposed development will have little or no impact upon county roads. If the county elects to use increments to improve county roads, it must notify the City within thirty days of receipt of this plan. AA. REDUCTION IN STATE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING AID Pursuant to the Special Act, Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 is exempt from the Local Government Aid (LGA) and Homestead and Agricultural Aid (HACA) penalties usually incurred by tax increment districts. However, 15 percent of the revenues generated from tax increment must be used for housing activities as defined by the Special Act. 11 -15 1/16194 City of Brooklyn Center /EDA - Tax Increment District No. 03 Page 3 ESTIMATED EMPACTS ON JURISDICTIONS % OF CTC ENTITY'S CAPTURED % OF IN SCHOOL TAX TAX CAP. CTC TO DISTRICT BASE (CTC) BASE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 21,563,017 4,700,000 21.80% HENNEPIN COUNTY 928,379,673 4,700,000 0.51% SCHOOL DISTRICT 279-0 88169th: 23.46% 67,083,479 1,103,681 1.65% SCHOOL DISTRICT 281-0 Brookdale 40.97% 70,036,202 1,925,717 2.75% SCHOOL DISTRICT 11-0 Willow/252 2.63% 20,172,541 123,617 0.61% SCHOOL DISTRICT 286-0 Willow/25 32.91% 7,140,511 1,546,985 21.66% CAPTURED ENTITY'S TAX TAX POTENTIAL CAPACITY RATES TAXES CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER"' 4,700,000 0.27603 1,297,341 HENNEPIN COUNTY 4,700,000 0.37441 1,759,727 OTHER 4,700,000 0.07043 331,021 SCHOOL DISTRICT 279-0 BB/69th: 1,103,681 0.66786 737,104 SCHOOL DISTRICT 281-0 Brookdale: 1,925,717 0.64401 1,240,181 SCHOOL DISTRICT 11-0 Willow/252: 123,617 0.57161 70,661 SCHOOL DISTRICT 286-0 Willow/252: 1,546,985 0.56614 875,810 TOTAL IN S.D. #279 1.38873 1,532,715 TOTAL IN S.D. #281 1.36488 2,628,372 TOTAL IN S.D. #11 1.28439 151,066 TOTAL IN S.D. #286 1.28701 1.990.985 TOTAL 6,303,139 Tax capacity totals only include portion of district in Hennepin County. '• Includes HRA tax rate 3T100-08 Prepared by Publicorp Inc. PLANRUN EXHIBIT II -C Data on Qualifications as a Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District SITE A (Brooklyn Boulevard/69th Area) Occupied Total Occupied Parcels As Parcel Parcel A Percent Number Buildings Total Parcels Sq. Ft Sq. Ft. of District of Bldgs. Substandard 75 4,126,220 3,844,656 93.18% 75 49 Parcels consisting of 93.18% of the area of Site A of District No. 03 are considered to be occupied 0 i and 65.33% of the buildings in Site A of District No. 03 are considered to be substandard. SITE B (Brookdale Area): Occupied Total Occupied Parcels As Parcel Parcel A Percent Number Buildings Total Parcels So. Ft Sq. Ft. of District of Bldgs. Substandard 72 9,182,884 9,145,929 99.60% 91 56 Parcels consisting of 99.60% of the area of Site B of District No. 03 are considered to be occupied and 61.54% of the buildings in Site B of District No. 03 are considered to be substandard. SITE C (Willow /252 Area): Occupied Total Occupied Parcels As Parcel Parcel A Percent Number Buildings Total Parcels So. Ft Sq. Ft. of District of Bldgs. Substandard 74 7,478,883 5,244,050 70.12% 85 53 TOTAL SITE C Parcels consisting of 70.12% of the area of Site C of District No. 03 are considered to be occupied and 62.35% of the buildings in Site C of District No. 03 are considered to be substandard. 11 -C -1 I EXHIBIT II -D Copy of the Special Act I I -D -1 04/30/94 (REVISOR ] JMR /KK CCRHF3209 1 the bonds shall not constitute net debt within the meaning of 2 Minnesota Statutes, section 475.53_,- or a debt of the county 3 within the meaning of any other statutory provision, and* (2) 4 Minnesota Statutes, section 475.58, does not apply. 5 Subd. 3. [EFFECTIVE DATE.] This section is effective the 6 day following final enactment, upon compliance by the Mah nomen 7 county board with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021. 8 Sec. 13. [CITY OF LAKE CRYSTAL; TIF DISTRICT.] 9 Subdivision 1. [DURATION.] Notwithstanding the provisions 10 of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.176, subdivisions 1 and lb, 11 the authority may extend the duration of city of Lake Crystal 12 tax increment financing district No. 2 -1 through December 31, 13 2018. 14 Subd. 2. [EFFECTIVE DATE.] This section is effective upon 15 compliance by the governing body of the city of Lake Crystal - 16 with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivision 3. 17 Sec. 14. [BROOKLYN CENTER; REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.] 18 Subdivision 1. (ESTABLISHMENT.] The city of Brooklyn 19 Center may establish an redevelopment tax increment financing 20 district in which 15 percent of the revenues generated from tax 21 increment in any year is deposited in the housing development_ 22 account of the authority and expended according to the tax 23 increment financing plan. 24 Subd. 2. [ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES.] The authority must 25 identify in the plan the housing activities that will be 26 assisted by the housing development account. Housing activities 27 may include rehabilitation, acquisition, demolition, and i 28 financing f new or existing single family or multifamil j g Y Y 29 housing. Housing activities listed in the plan need not be 30 located within the district or project area but must be 31 activities that meet the requirements of a qualified housing 32 district under Minnesota Statutes, section 273.1399 or 469.1761, 33 subdivision 2. 34 Subd. 3. [HOUSING ACCOUNT.] Tax increment to be expended 35 for housing activities under this section must be segregated by 36 the authority into a special account on its official books and Article 9 Section 14 147 04/30/94 (REVISOR ] JMR /KK CCRHF3209 1 records The account may also receive funds fr oth public 2 and private sources. 3 Subd. 4. (EXEMPTION.] The district established under this 4 section is exempt from the provisions of Minneso Statutes, 5 section 273.1399. 6 Subd. 5. (LOCAL APPROVAL.] This section is effective upon 7 approval by the governing body of 'the city of B rooklyn C enter 8 under Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivision 2. 9 Sec. 15. (CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS; SEWARD SOUTH URBAN RENEWAL 10 AREA.] 11 The Minneapolis community development agency may establi 12 an economic development tax increment financing dis trict under 13 Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.174 to 469.178, for the 14 retention and expansion of a private educational campus located 15 within a certain area of Seward South urban renewal area which 16 was incorporated into the urban renewal area p ursuant to a 17 modification no 9 which was adopted by the citv of Minneapolis 18 as of April 12, 1985. The district established under this 19 section is not subject to the limitations of Minne Statutes, 20 section 469 176, subdivision 4c The proceeds of the levy by 21 Hennepin countv on captured net tax capacity within the district 22 established under this section will be paid to Henne county 23 unless the Hennepin county board approves the implem of 24 tax increment financing with respect to the county's levy within 25 and for the purposes of the district. 26 Sec. 16. (CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS; NORTH WASHINGTON INDUSTRIAL 27 PARK REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.] 28 (a) A hazardous substance subdistrict may be estab lished by 29 the Minneapolis community development agency and the city of 30 Minneapolis within the North Washington indust park 31 redevelopment project in the city of Minneapo The district 32 would be subject to the provisions of thi section. 33 (b) In addition to the uses of tax increme r evenues . 34 authorized in Minnesota Statutes, section 469.176, subdivision 35 4e, the city f Minneapolis or the Minneapo communit Y i Y 36 development agency may use tax increment revenu derived from Article 9 Section 16 148 EXHIBIT II -E Prior Planned Improvements I II-E-1 EXHIBIT II -A Boundary Maps of Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 as established December 19, 1994 11 -A -1 tr �1uJUA_ •�e � �` I ,( -- rM w . K r I W. CIA • • [r :n - .AlfA+ll sA1E..r- r A[of"I .NM F IAttul e1 c O141C1. ; WaL LAS k -L.. \t • ' '` _ � Loo A W� .I .N Y KAAI IAOl Cllr [� A \[ r Y I � � -. L1�01- G1_l:- � 1y O 100 I atrslu °A* mcl+m —• f w . [ N r 41w• r.K n r 1 L 1 IT All W. I 4 _� rrA 1 t1I -n_ ' /-•Ait-J �� ` WMA .\' r .. 4 x 4 .K N x .t 9 _ - •- ---- t.i.r S-',• Irly+ Jl(tl_ �. u00 . Z •4 M .1..�._ \� • [ � r / ^� ___.. Al — 'Lli 4•Iwn SKr 61 .lull �L K /1 Llw �`SY All.-- l f -11 4KO e411 Alt V _ k j 1��{ IT1 woo ITI i y - ra 'e — a i r►w t .K N _ -j;- _ l' • k.j — :Y `I. w tlt_ idil 1 IrK ; � r � �� • 'a D � All r JA O �.•- r i • .WiY /� Mh .K Y 1 S • . .' \ ` ` ' AK IP � t \ a l �� R ► 1 v am Alt Y O s rI +S '•� _� c \[ I[.AA Alt r n V • 1919! ; !"!w _ ; 4 'i �} i ai (. «.� D 1001111 Alt • L ` �1 \ - ..:�°"^_ — a1 d a a .[� J'! ' y,jln,a ■�A1�r[[[ �XAxt All Y O /�• _� 11 \ KY4 - J Oil 'L — / ti 4111r.M A\E • O 1r11 n '� • �;t y ' 1 r ' _ U (/ L YLIJ _ U. .H r Nnw .K r 199 _ _ l y[Nl[,n.N r >A Mull. Alt 0 _ .1 Off A Off. Alt 0 0 0 � E ^ B ` a g • 0 & � �' jYL Z � C 'a" Nt • FF S 1 3 ➢ 1c1 i y,[. J100 O ug' M r .— _ 1 • a-1— k 1NA .K r •� rn O _— 4100 C r+��� 1lL' 719!11 i OO � �r> 7► Vi 4 o - v Wyyl_�Ell. -� R wume .\t N ► m 7 p -gyf \ • taco tocui "all IIOO i. 4494.4 r rM err �— iA INf AK r — _ 1100 AXII of .K r AVE 11 of Iwo u --- k - -- -t1t.YL ' N M L 1/1 1� Y Elr.lL Q _ • -•I -1 _ E 4K + Ak no9 ren 4N N 1CUdU1 \ t14tJ11 �` _ as 01 . _ '1 "Asui .K 11 Ar GN AStN -->�1— lllbSd ALL-. m 1 ttlY+'Y -L1Y1 rte _ ""i1 .K N M ICMFA1.Kr /1 1 Q yl i el_n 1T ' i111G rt_u. . +tlst ; - ! r,� I w m INI .K N 1 �.. _._ IL'1y1."� - "__ �— i — -- — � y(!,►ur �... f r L x nt+ r.YNN A Y .r � . t� , =! [!0193 1 tli"l sin._ — r Wig • —ti goo 111 [III .\t • i.� " 1 E_111 _16"11 IEI 100 - L In Jlr C lit oil( Al LAUL Ul sin 41 AA tro o./A nr r 1111 Ir ►� � - i roar III . •�'u ►�' ii i�� °\\��t1. „, ` ,,. ■ /1111 111 E �■ .. � _ �� . �' � � �) /_ /�/ �� ; � � ,, 'bra :::■ ■■ � i r% 4�,��11 .ai � � � �_� ����``\��� ,� �= '•' � : ■ '�� 1� :E E : � it � I�l �i �� � �► � ±\^ Cllr nr� /N• �; : 4 ? :: 1111 1 � 1������1 r111r .� ��,�__ -. �. r� r �� r 1 11 1 r� ��IlllirO•• �� �r •,; ,n �' 1111 111 111 � L ;�� -- J�1 �� I�IC��� .�. ���► � Q 11 111 �1 / Ii��� �el���u�i�►��,\ , 1� i� /1 1 11 11= r R �► ■ ..:5'1 � 1 91�� 11 11. �j, ,� .' .�./ � ►u, — _ . •v ♦♦ � � 111111/1 1 11 1 � � � IIIeI 1 il��lll 111111 %��� ♦♦ ���� ►--- -- � � . ►�;�� ;�! ■111 111 : � ',� � ��� . +.- ��� s. 1,� � • • • �' 1 it 11 .. � � � s f������.� �� i 1111 i'1111�• .�.,. 11!�+�f±!� = ,� ►�►•►� ■ ■111 1111 . �� ar■ '� +�';�,,�� is ■: Irrlt■ .,�. ►��..�., ♦ � � .. all log = !. 111111 1 1111111 ��� ��'� r� r ��i1/1 �ji1!��1 1111111 i� �1 ill �.� .... ■'� 1 � � � Ji�!I ■ rr ��■ 111111111 111 �.. on � � 111111 ■����� Al ■. :. ... •• iLlll i11��1 ■i i" " 1 �i IIIM�� ► /" :� �' 11 f �� � 111\ � � �� 1 �l� 111 11 x'111 11 _ • 1► ��•!'��r 1 �� � � �``�� �1 11 1 111 1 1 t tr M IMI 11!l i � i • ••� ••� 1 � 1, � � �,,+ /' • 111 � . - 111111111111111111 . � ��� 11 • • �• Ii X111 =��1 1 ,�� �� �.IIIIIIIIL��Iltal �. r'J� - � .�i i �� �. - ���• ti ' 11► ;111 1 .. �� r i 1 � r ��.� :: - ,,.... t1� ....'� ,;.� X1111 X11 ► i� Ii j j 1 = =� = =i� ■' ���� � ��•'' `..: . rirr�il■ ......• ■ . moo rte► .I■ i■■ �r■ _� �� �. a■� ■ '� �i � 1 111 � j♦♦� ♦�� ♦��♦ •�:.�O �� � it �/� f!� �♦ �"r � � ,� I � ♦♦ ♦♦ � ♦ ♦♦ ��i�� MIN Mom roll WRYN toy FAR —ASWAMIFAM Co. WW" SOM AN REM NNUMIS FOR MEN Em i- mm WERE mom ♦ ♦� ♦.. ♦�♦a`♦��L1t •1 ` / Imo ♦• --..,, ! ��� ♦ mow —M M— MM RE 11111 Am ��!♦�.�� ��■ 1 �► ` �♦� ♦ ♦�; /l 1111111 1�1■ - .1. i ��i ♦i 1� 91412 ■11■■ ■■ .. C NO fail k Kill ZEN IM IF ER mom ML Ella 1111 Billings -- WOUR MORE ME MFWA i ►i Iii' � 1►�1��� � � � o f "Vi � ■ �� e J� mill ♦e - � M 'fir rya __ ■� ■�© ■1■ t ��������� , i i � ♦ wLi wr ■■ �� ii �s i - it i �' no i C WC : ��C 5�111 �■ r . w .. am am ♦- �..= M W _ _■ w� r �r �� �� ��, , � ' • ', � � . .w 111 ■ � i - ♦ a aaoo�alaeaaer �♦e, - a INN^ h f • ,���� �n a Aeeaetie��m ® ®� ♦� .�,se!e .e/`�� �,'► �� -- Ewa _ ' "_. �t�l Id' a�an� dp�i�pE7 ©, © ♦�� ♦ 1►,A ♦ � + , . �. _ _. _ -- -! _ � _ 1 11 11p 9EIQ4AnOg4ppog ®'�e�9 ° i �s ♦ e ♦ A ♦ ♦ : — '� . , � , p MIN on o va 111. 061 -4 , ..., • ;•• • EXHIBIT II -B Cashflow Analysis and Base Value Analysis II-B-1 1116194 City of Brooklyn Center/EDA - Tax Increment District No. 03 Page 1 T.I.F. CASH FLOW ASSUMPTIONS Inflation Rate: 0.0000% Interest Rate: 8.000% F.D. Contribution Ratio: 34.715% Pay 94 Tax Extension Rate 279-0 BB169th: 138.873% Pay 94 Tax Extension Rate 281-0 Brookdale: 136.488% Pay 94 Tax Extension Rate 11- 0 Willow/252: 128.439% Pay 94 Tax Extension Rate 286-0 Willow/252: 128.701% Pay 94 BASE VALUE INFORMATION Market Tax Payable Value Capacity Year Brooklyn Blvd/69th Area 29,394,900 736,319 Pay 95 Brookdale Area 126,077,400 5,638,185 Pay 95 Willow/252 Area 47,844.000 1,885,899 Pay 95 Total Original Market Value 203 316,300 8,260,403 Class Rate: Rental <4 Units 2.30% Pay 97 C/I <$100,000 3.00% Pay 97 C/I >$100,000 4.60% Pay 97 Homestead <$72,000 1.00% Pay 97 Homestead >$72,000 2.00% Pay 97 Exempt: 0.00% Pay 97 Original Tax Capacity: 8,260,403 Pay 97 PROJECT VALUE INFORMATION Type of Tax Increment District: Redevelopment Type of Development: Multi -Use Estimated New Market Value On Jan. 2, 1996: 21,000,000 Pay 97 Estimated New Market Value On Jan. 2, 1997: 21,000,000 Pay 98 Estimated New Market Value On Jan. 2.1998: 21,000,000 Pay 99 Estimated New Market Value On Jan. 2,1999: 21,000,000 Pay 00 Estimated New Market Value On Jan. 2, 2000: 21,000,000 Pay 01 Final New Market Value: 105,000,000 Pay 01 Estimated New Tax Capacity on Jan. 2.1996: 940,000 Pay 97 Estimated New Tax Capacity on Jan. 2.1997: 940,000 Pay 98 Estimated New Tax Capacity on Jan. 2.1998: 940,000 Pay 99 Estimated New Tax Capacity on Jan. 2.1999: 940,000 Pay 00 Estimated New Tax Capacity on Jan. 2.2000: 940,000 Pay 01 Total New Project Tax Capacity at Completion: 4,700 000 Pay 01 BT100-08 Prepared by Publicorp Inc. PLANRUN 1/18/94 City of Brooklyn Center /EDA - Tax Increment District No. 03 Page 2 TAX INCREMENT CASH FLOW Orig. Project Captured Semi - Annual Minimum Semi- Annual 'ERIOD BEGINS Tax Tax Tax Gross Tax Housing Admin. • Net Tax Yrs. of PERIOD ENDING Mth. Yr. Capacity Capacity Capacity Increment 15.00% 10.00% Increment TI Yrs. Mth. Yr. 12 -01 1995 8,260,403 8,260,403 0 0 0 0 0 0.508-01 1995 v..+ 08 -01 1995 8,260,403 8,260,403 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 02 -01 1996 1.002-01 1996 8,260,403 8,260,403 0 0 0 0 0 1.508-01 1996 1.5 08 -01 1996 8,260,403 8,260,403 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 2.002-01 1997 2.002-01 1997 8,260,403 9,200,403 940,000 630,314 94,547 63,031 472,735 1.0 2.5 08 -01 1997 2.508-01 1997 8,260,403 9,200,403 940,000 630,314 94,547 63,031 472,735 1.5 3.0 02 -01 1998 3.002-01 1998 8,260,403 10,140,403 1,680,000 1,260,628 189,094 126,063 945,471 2.0 3.508-01 1998 3.508-01 1998 8,260,403 10,140,403 1,880,000 1,260,628 189,094 126,063 945,471 2.5 4.002-01 1999 4.002-01 1999 8,260,403 11,080,403 2,820,000 1,890,942 283,641 189,094 1,418,206 3.0 4.508-01 1999 4.508-01 1999 8,260,403 11,080,403 2,820,000 1,890,942 283,641 189,094 1,418,206 3.5 5.002-01 2000 5.002-01 2000 8,260,403 12,020,403 3,760,000 2,521,256 378,188 252,126 1,890,942 4.0 5.508-01 2000 5.508-01 2000 8,260,403 12,020,403 3,760,000 2,521,256 378,188 252,126 1,890,942 4.5 6.0 02 -01 2001 6.002-01 2001 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 5.0 6.508-01 2001 6.508-01 2001 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 5.5 7.002-01 2002 7.0 02 -01 2002 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 6.0 7.508-01 2002 7.508-01 2002 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2.363,677 6.5 8.0 02 -01 2003 8.0 02 -01 2003 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 7.0 8.5 08 -01 2003 8.508-01 2003 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2 363 , 677 7.5 9.0 02 -01 2004 9.002-01 2004 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 8.0 9.5 08 -01 2004 9.508-01 2004 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 8.5 10.0 02 -01 2005 10.0 02 -01 2005 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2.363,677 9.0 10.5 08 -01 2005 10.508-01 2005 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 9.5 11.0 02 -01 2006 11.0 02 -01 2006 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 10.0 11.5 08 -01 2006 11.508-01 2006 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 10.5 12.0 02 -01 2007 12.0 02 -01 2007 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 11.0 12.508-01 2007 12.508-01 2007 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 11.5 13.0 02 -01 2008 13.002-01 2008 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 12.0 13.508-01 2008 13.508-01 2008 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 12.5 14.0 02 -01 2009 14.0 02 -01 2009 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472.735 315,157 2,363,677 13.0 14.508-01 2009 14.508-01 2009 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 13.5 15.0 02 -01 2010 15.0 02 -01 2010 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 14.0 15.5 08 -01 2010 08 -01 2010 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 14.5 16.0 02 -01 2011 Q -01 2011 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 15.0 16.508-01 2011 1-, 08 -01 2011 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 15.5 17.0 02 -01 2012 17.0 02 -01 2012 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472.735 315,157 2,363,677 16.0 17.508-01 2012 17.508-01 2012 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 16.5 18.0 02 -01 2013 15 2 363 677 17.0 18.5 08 -01 2013 7 18.0 02 -01 2013 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 318 . 18.508-01 2013 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 17.5 19.0 02 -01 2014 19.0 02 -01 2014 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 18.0 19.5 08 -01 2014 19.508-01 2014 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 18.5 20.0 02 -01 2015 20.0 02 -01 2015 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 19.0 20.508-01 2015 20.508-01 2015 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 19.5 21.002-01 2016 21.0 02 -01 2016 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 20.0 21.508-01 2016 21.508-01 2016 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 20.5 22.0 02-01 2017 22.0 02 -01 2017 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 21.0 22.508-01 2017 22.508-01 2017 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2.363,677 21.5 23.002-01 2018 23.0 02 -01 2018 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 22.0 23.508-01 2018 23.5 08-01 2018 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,3 63 , 677 22.5 24.002-01 2019 24.0 02 -01 2019 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 23.0 24.508-01 2019 24.508-01 2019 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 23.5 25.0 02 -01 2020 25.0 02 -01 2020 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 24.0 25.508-01 2020 25.508-01 2020 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472,735 315,157 2,363,677 24.5 26.0 02 -01 2021 26.002-01 2021 8,260,403 12,960,403 4,700,000 3,151,569 472.735 315.157 2,363,677 25.0 26.508-01 2021 Totals 141,820,624 21,273,094 14,182,062 106,365,468 Present Values 48,069,393 7,210,409 4,806,939 36.052.045 I BT100-08 Prepared by Publicorp Inc. PLANRUN Member Debra Hilstrom ntroduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94 -3 RESOLUTION OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER PLANNING COMMISSION FINDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO 03 (A REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT) AND THE MODIFICATION OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 AND THE ADOPTION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN RELATING THERETO TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY. WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center City Council has proposed to adopt the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 and modify the Redevelopment Plan for Housing and Development Project No. 1 (the "Plans ") and has submitted the Plans to the Brooklyn Center Planning Commission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Plans to be determined the consistency of the Plans to the Comprehensive Plan of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Brooklyn Center Planning Commission that the Plans are consistent with the Brooklyn Center Comprehensive Plan. yr •= � ` J Date Chairperson ATTEST: �'�" r, L JC � Planning Commission Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Donald Booth and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Willson, Holmes, Mickelson, Hilstrom and Booth and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. AM ON TO TABLE PLANNING PLi TI N NO, 94 016 R ALE C. VVENANT CHURCH UNTIL JANUARY 12, 1995 There was a motion by Commissioner Booth and seconded by Commissioner Mickelson to table of Application No. 94016 submitted by Brookdale Covenant Church for special use permit and site and building plan approval to construct a 12,500 square foot recreation area addition to the existing church located at 5139 Brooklyn Boulevard to the Planning Commission Meeting of January 12, 1995. Voting in favor: Chairperson Willson, Commissioners HOstrom, Holmes, Booth, Mickelson, and Reem. The motion passed. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING P LAN Chairperson Willson introduced the next item of business, Resolution of the Brooklyn Center Planning Commission finding the establishment of the Tax Increment Financing District No. 03 (A Redevelopment District) and the Modification Housing Development and Rc dcytlopment Project No. 1 and the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan and Redevelopment Plan relating there to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, The Secretary presented the staff report, used overhead transparencies to show the location and detail The Secretary explained that the staff believes that the establishment of the Tax Increment Financing Districts and the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan are consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. He explained that any projects associated with the Tax Increment Financing Plan will still have to come before the Planning Commission for plan review and approval. Chairperson Willson asked what type of development or redevelopment the financing would be used for. Jerry Splinter, City Manager, stated that the Willow Lane Apartments were originally designated to be redeveloped to Senior Housing. A market study was done wid it was determined by the City Council that this would be -too risky. He explained that a minimum of 15% of the Tax Increment Funds had to be used for redevelopment. The balance can be used for other projects. He stated that the City's intention of establishing the Tax Increment Financing District had been sent to all four Independent School Districts. itileetings have been held with the Brooklyn Center School District official and a satisfactory agreement has been reached. The other three school districts have not responded. Commissioner Holmes inquired as to the process of the Tax Increment Financing. The City Manager explained that when a Tax Increment Financing District is established, the area in the district tuxes are frozen at the current rate for a period of time, The City then captures the increment for that period and has use of those funds for specific projects. The taxpayer 12 -8 -94 7 does not notice a difference in his tax amount. The new taxes now as an increment into the FDA of the City for redevelopment. Commissioner Holmes asked how long the Tax Increment Funding continues. The City Manager stated that it can be 20 to 25 years. It can also be shortened. Commissioner Reem asked if the funding can be used for single family homes and if there are any criteria for the projects. City Manager explained that the intention is to put 15% into housing projects which can includo single-family homes. City Manager noted that the redevelopment at Brookdale, including drainage and ponding improvements, will help Brookdale t4 be able to compete with other shopping centers such as Rosedale. Brookdale was built before the new ordinances were in place and it would be difficult for Brookdale to expand if they had to finance the drainage improvements themselves. Commissioner Mickelson inquired if the resolution is approved by the Planning Commission, does the City Council have the authority to disapprove certain sites. City Manager stated that they do have the authority. Commissioner Re= asked if it was foreseeable that any other areas in Brooklyn Center would be established as Tax Increment Funding Districts. City Manager stated that this area had been made as large as possible and that he did not foresee any other areas being affected. He also reminded that tax increment funds can be spent outside of the District. ACTION RECOMMENDING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN Member Debra Hilstrom introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -3 REGARDING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by C,nmmissioner Donald Booth and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Commissioners Willson, Hilstrom, Holmes, Booth, Mickelson, and Rc duly the following voted against the same; none, where upon said resolution was declared y passed and adopted. OTHER BUKHESS 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGSCHEDULE of the Planning . The Secretary noted the next meeting g Commission will be January 12, 1995 He distributed a copy of the proposed 1995 Planning Commission meeting dates. 12 -8 -94 8 TIF DISTRICT NO. 3. SITE A CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MINNESOTA AREA PERIMETER PID # HOUSE 0 STREET NAME ZIP CODE PROP NAMEIOWNER LAND VALUE BLDG VALUE TOTAL VALUE TAX CAP TAX CAP TAX CAP HOMESTEAD PROP TYPE BLDG AREA AREA ACRES AREA SO FT IMPROVED AREA COVERAGE QUALIF. AREA # BLDG$. BLIGHTED 16,260.23 535.56 2711921330046 4212 69TH AVE N 55429 City of Brooklyn Ctr. $20,000 $o $20,000 0 0 0 LR 0.22 9,750 0 O% 0 0 31,169.45 742.93 2811921410125 - 0 R. Lang $27,800 $0 $27,500 0 639 639 LR 0.70 30,550 0 0% 0 0 111,635.40 1,541.51 2611921410124 D City of Brooklyn Ctr. $18,500 $0 $18,500 0 426 426 LR 0.36 15,620 0 0% 0 0 437,203.60 2,918.56 2711921340008 4206 69TH AVE N 55429 $20,000 $0 $20,000 0 0 0 LR 0.22 9,750 0 0% 0 0 152,645.00 1,749.27 3411921210003 6631 FRANCE AVE N 55429 City of B.C. (water tower) $46,800 $641,900 $668,700 0 0 0 R 1,00 43,350 0 O% 0 1 29,214.55 711.57 3411921210007 3955 69TH AVE N 55429 R Dawson $25,000 $21,700 $46,700 0 1,074 1,074 R 400 0,88 36,400 1,736 5% 0 1 1 20,719.35 716.52 3411921210006 4011 69TH AVE N 55429 H. Dawson $25,000 $27,300 $52,300 523 0 523 H R 845 0.88 38,400 1,820 S% 0 1 1 26,514.35 703.09 3411921210005 4101 GOTH AVE N 55429 0. & J. Gruenke $25,000 $58,300 $83,300 946 0 946 H R 1,476 0.88 38,500 2,440 6% 0 1 1 2711921330061 6938 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Dr. Moen D.D.S. $67,SOO $20,300 $07,600 0 2,634 2,634 CC 624 0.21 9,000 624 9% 0 1 1 26,632.22 757.77 3411921210029 4007 69TH AVE N 55429 T. 6 J. Hansen $20,700 $44,900 $6500 658 0 856 H R 1,000 044 19,294 2,252 12% 0 1 1 10,446.16 476.08 2711921330054 6927 JUNE AVE N 55429 C. Lane $19,500 $32,400 $51,900 0 1,194 1,194 R 796 0.22 9,750 1,236 13% 0 1 1 9,753.69 407.05 3411921210004 4001 69TH AVE N 55429 G. Joelson $20,400 $39,300 $59,700 597 0 597 H R 718 0.44 19,200 2,500 13% 0 1 1 12,294.45 461.94 2711921330099 6915 BROOKLYN BLVD C. Cady $18,500 $39,800 $58,300 1,341 1,341 R 876 0.22 9,636 1,450 15% 1 1 1 9,720.28 409.78 2711921330023 6933 LEE AVE N 55429 C. 6 L. Porter $19,500 $47,200 $66,700 667 0 667 H R 1,040 0.22 9,525 1,436 15% 1 1 17,104.13 600.69 2711921330018 6900 LEE AVE N 55429 L. Loung 8 L. Gang $19,100 $47,000 $66,100 661 0 661 H R 1,140 0.22 9,375 1,422 15% 1 1 18,921.03 671.22 3411921210030 8700 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Ryan Olds $1,178,100 $698,900 $1,875,000 0 84,650 84,850 CC 32,406 6.00 261,360 40,000 15% 1 4 4 4,842.20 320.09 2711921330089 7031 HALIFAX AVE N 55429 Church of SL Alphonsus $281,600 $3,651,600 $3,933,200 0 0 0 C 17.76 773,517 119,000. 15% 1 1 6,816.94 388.31 2711921330053 6935 JUNE AVE N 55429 R. 6 D. Gustafson $19,500 $39,400 $56,900 589 0 569 H R 957 0.22 9,750 1,500 15% 1 1 1 9,219.00 398.66 3411921210020 6727 GRIMES AVE N 55429 E. Erikeson $18,500 $44,700 $63,200 632 0 632 H R 900 0.24 10,452 1,620 15% 1 1 1 6,540.15 363.64 2711921330051 6944 JUNE AVE N 55429 J. Berg $19,500 $37,000 $57,300 573 0 573 H R 768 0.29 12,450 1,973 16% 1 1 i 9.728.44 409.69 2711921330050 6930 JUNE AVEN 55429 J. Scott $19,500 $45,400 $64,900 849 0 649 H R 980 0.29 12,450 1,980 16% 1 1 1 12,013.56 450.25 3411921210021 6719 GRIMES AVE N 55429 P. 6 R. Laphom $19,500 $42,900 $62,400 624 0 624 H R 900 0.23 10,050 1,600 16% 1 1 1 9,464.31 398.38 3411921220017 8801 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Brookdals Pontiac $699,100 $1,108,700 $1,807,800 0 83,159 83,159 C 20,030 4.01 174,676 28,030 16% 1 2 9,355.95 401.05 2711921330007 7014 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 J. Ski $2100 $46,500 $70,100 701 0 701 H R 1,197 0.56 25,350 4,072 16% 1 1 1 • 8,991.67 390.99 3411921220010 4315 88TH AVEN 55429 Rockwell Manufacturing $99.200 $52,600 $152,ODO 0 5,392 5,392 CC 3,200 0.46 19,837 3,200 16% 1 1 1 8,401.56 396.14 3411921220012 4435 88TH AVE N 55429 Osseo Bus Garage $788,900 $487,600 $1,276,500 0 58,719 58,719 C 34,040 4.83 210,372 34,040 16% 1 1 9,736.70 409.92 2711921330008 7015 KYLE AVE N 55429 M. Hagen $15,600 $76,400 $92,000 1,120 0 1,120 H R 1,805 0.68 29,526 4,605 16% 1 1 1 13,416.76 568.762811921440001 7020 PERRY AVEN 55429 ISO 279 $227,700 $2,190,600 $2,418,300 0 0 0 C 11.38 495,712 81,250 16% 1 1 12,087.50 459.25 2711921330062 6944 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 P. Wilson $16,500 $51,500 $70,000 700 0 700 H R 884 0.22 9,490 1,560 16% 1 1 1 27,444.71 695.33 2711921330049 6932 JUNE AVE N 56429 D. Holmes $19,500 $57,100 $76,600 612 0 812 H R 1,318 0.29 12,450 2,066 17% 1 1 1 .8,822.81 392.74 2711921330024 6927 LEE AVE N 55429 J. Otloson $18,500 $50,200 $68,700 687 0 687 H R 1,024 0.20 8,909 1,502 17% 1 1 9,113.41 390.23 2711921330028 4500 69TH AVE N 55429 R. Hines $19,100 $48,600 $67,700 677 0 677 H R 978 0.22 9,525 1,610 17% 1 1 12,526.68 465.19 3411921220011 4321 68TH AVE N 55429 Zitzloft Building $159,700 $96,800 $256,500 0 11,799 11,799 C 5,400 0.73 31,944 5,400 17% 1 1 1 8,796.37 392.44 3411921220007 6848 LEE AVE N 55429 U. S. Postal Semi" $673,900 $3,083,400 $3,757,300 0 0 0 C 4.76 207,345 35,200 17-A 1 1 13,095.84 485.34 2711921330025 6921 LEE AVE N 55429 D. killer $18,500 $43,000 $61,500 615 0 615 H R 632 0.20 8,909 1,522 17% 1 1 9,743.06 407.56 2711921330084 6956 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Brooklyn Printing $57,600 $19,200 $76,600 0 2.304 2,304 CC 1,315 0.18 7,880 1,315 17% 1 1 1 12,452.84 464.32 2711921330021 6945 LEE AVE N 55429 J. Teske 6 L. Siibert $18,800 $48,000 $68,800 668 0 668 H R 1,016 0.22 9,525 1,640 17% 1 1 15,037.10 542.68 2711921330027 6907 LEE AVE N 55429 0. 6 J. Hard $19,500 $51,500 $71,000 710 0 710 H R 1,044 0.22 9,525 1,676 18% 1 1 9,092.58 392.35 3411921210009 5600 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 North Star Dodge $1,274,100 $566,100 $1,660,200 0 65,569 65,569 C 30,716 6.50 283,140 50,000 16% 1 3 1 9,427.33 402.70 2711921330052 5945 JUNE AVE N 55429 T. & J. Pohl $19,500 $47,1100 $67,300 673 0 673 H R 980 0.22 9,750 1,736 18% 1 1 1 9,454.10 404.53 2711921330026 6915 LEE AVE N 55429 D. 8 J. Beer $19,500 $46,000 $67,500 675 0 675 H R 1,005 0.22 9,525 1,696 18% 1 1 9,668.68 408.01 2711921330012 6933 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 City of Brooklyn Ctr. $18,500 $44,900 $63,400 0 1,458 1,458 R 1,345 0.23 9,906 1,629 18% 1 1 1 8,865.10 390.18 2711921330022 6939 LEE AVE N 55429 D. 6 D. Bornholdt $19,500 $49,600 $89,100 691 0 891 H R 1,102 0.22 9,525 1,606 19% 1 1 8,941.26 354.23 2711921330019 6914 LEE AVE N 55429 D. 6 E. Lowry $19,700 $60.000 $79,700 874 0 874 H R 1,294 0.32 13,770 2,622 19% 1 1 9,206.59 395.84 2711921330011 6939 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 J. 8 J. Bremselh $18,500 $46,100 $64,600 648 0 646 H R 936 0.22 9,525 1,616 19% 1 1 1 9,484.47 390.34 2711921330013 6927 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 J. 6 C. Griffin $18,500 $44,200 $62,700 627 0 627 H R 928 0.23 9,906 1,690 19% 1 1 1 9,295.74 397.10 2711921330046 6916 JUNE AVE N 55429 L. Pelserson $19,500 $41,500 $61,000 610 0 610 H R 936 0.29 12,450 2,378 19% 1 1 1 9,702.69 407.12 2711921330047 6912 JUNE AVE N 55429 R. Lans $19,100 $39,600 $58,700 587 0 567 H R 1,040 0.29 12,450 2,396 19% 1 1 1 36,666.23 614.71 2711921330017 4416 69TH AVE N 55429 B. Pomerleau $19,100 $40,500 $59,600 596 0 596 H R 832 0.22 9,375 1,872 20% 1 1 38,30014 811.83 3411921220008 4301 68TH AVE N 55429 Iten Truck $403,600 $418,600 $822,200 0 37,821 37,821 C 14,950 1.68 73,373 14,950 20% 1 2 2 19,036.23 661.00 3411921210022 6715 GRIMES AVE N 55429 E. 6 E. Carlson $19,500 $41,400 $60,900 609 0 609 H R 900 0.23 10,050 2,052 20% 1 1 1 19,195.37 662.16 2711921330014 6921 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 S. Burkholder $18,500 $40,200 $58,700 587 0 567 H R 833 0.23 9,906 2,023 20% 1 1 1 38,680.94 814.63 3411921210023 6707 GRIMES AVE N 55429 A. L. Tuttle $16,400 $44,900 $63,300 633 0 633 H R 1,143 0.23 10,050 2,095 21% 1 1 1 38,735.30 814.94 2711921330020 6920 LEE AVE N 55429 R 6 M. Groashans $19,500 $56,900 $76,400 808 0 BOB H R 1,312 0.26 11,430 2,391 21% 1 1 282,771.50 3,016.92 3411921210000 4215 69TH AVE N 55429 Testes Thrift Bakery $247,500 $162,300 $409,800 0 18,851 18,851 C 11,709 1.26 55,000 11,709 21% 1 1 1 53,689.59 947.22 3411921220015 6846 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Pilgrim Cleaners $179,700 $141,000 $320,700 0 14,752 14,752 C 7,390 0.75 32,670 7,390 23% 1 2 2 31,372.01 798.922711921330067 7000 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 7000 Building $88,000 $68,300 $176,300 0 8,110 8,110 C 5,425 0.54 23,479 5,425 23% 1 1 1 205,712.50 1,889.66 3411921210028 6830 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Vicker's Gas $145,800 $10,000 $155,600 0 5,567 5,567 CC 319 0.36 15,578 3,819 25% 1 1 1 27,108.29 711.12 3411921210027 6822 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Big Wheel /Roes) $89,800 $88,700 $178,500 0 8,211 8,211 C 4,200 0.39 17,100 4,200 25% 1 1 1 42,731.59 909.23 271192133DOGS 4315 70TH AVE N 55429 Unique Kitchen $108,000 $146,300 $254,300 0 10,098 10,096 CC 5,355 0.41 18,000 5,355 30% 1 1 1 14,514.18 590.53 2711921330010 7015 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Willow Lane Apts. $290,000 $699,000 $1,189,000 0 40,426 40,426 A 50,652 3.65 167,636 50,652 30% 1 1 1 18,526.80 583.98 2711921330066 4307 70TH AVE N 55429 Duo's Post Legion $84,400 $34,000 $118,400 0 5,446 5,446 C 1,480 0.39 16,875 5,230 31% 1 1 1 175,555.50 1,706.16 2711921330060 6912 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Lane Shopping Center $202,500 $27,600 $230,100 0 10,585 10,565 C 9,202 0.62 27,000 9,202 34% 1 1 1 30,320.52 702.98 2711921330016 4408 89TH AVE N 55429 E. B D. Wright $30,000 $84,000 $114,000 0 3,876 3,676 A 3,600 0.23 10,000 3,600 36 1 1 262,946.10 2,287.61 2711921330057 4300 69TH AVE N 55429 Lane Shopping Center $46,500 $0 $46,500 0 2,139 2,139 LC 0.21 9,300 5,000 54% 1 0 208,132.90 1,955.53 2711921330059 0 Lane Land $45,000 $o $45,000 0 2,070 2,070 LC 0.21 9,000 5,000 56% 1 0 374,253.70 2,926.86 2711921330056 6900 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Lane Shopping Center $45,000 $0 $45,000 0 2,070 2,070 LC 0.21 9,000 5,000 56% 1 0 31,927.07 746.51 2711921390005 7018 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 E. Backer $44,000 $124,000 $168,000 0 5,712 5,712 A 12,000 0.46 20,000 12,000 60% 1 1 1 19,929.18 643.04 2711921330063 6950 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Brooklyn Printing It $65,700 $30,700 $96,400 0 2,692 2,692 CC 1,236 0.20 8,760 5,736 65% 1 1 1 72,696.57 1,086.22 2711921330056 0 Lane Land $28,600 $0 $26,600 0 1,318 1,316 LC 0.26 11,430 8,000 70 1 0 10,586.09 428.64 3411921220018 6837 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Brookdale Honda $213,700 $26,600 $240,30D 0 11,054 11,054 C 1,360 0.98 42,730 35,000 82% 1 1 9,933.46 418.36 3411921210031 6810 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Car -X Muffler $150,600 $165,500 $318,100 0 14,541 14,541 C 3,797 0.69 30,112 25,ODO 83% 1 1 9,812.04 413.97 3411921220016 6849 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Mobil Quick Slop $182,500 $174,700 $357,200 0 14,631 14,831 CC 3,760 0.64 28,072 25,000 69% 1 1 10,391.98 422.08 3411921220009 6701 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Iten Chevrolet $1,960,200 $1,353,500 $3,313,700 0 150,830 150,630 CC 55,229 9.00 392,040 350,000 59% 1 1 1 765,377.60 3,753.00 2711921330080 7022 BROOKLYN BLVD 55429 Boulevard Plaza Condo's $27,800 $50.200 $78,000 0 2,340 2,340 CC 1,200 0.17 7,403 7,000 95% 1 1 r 14,852.18 68,481.71 TOTALS $11,043,500 $18,351,400 $29,394,900 22,423 713,696 736,319 153,071 94.74 4,126,220 75 63 75 49 3,644,656 0.6533333333 0.93176224 B869TH.WK1 12J13M4, 02:35 PM TIF DISTRICT NO.3 - SITE B CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA PID # AREA PERIMETER PID # HOUSE # STREET NAME PROP NAMEIOWNER LAND VALUE BLDG VALUE TOTAL VALUE TAX CAP TAX CAP TAX CAP HOMESTEAD PROP TYPE BLDG AREA AREA ACRES AREA SO FT IMPROVED AREA COVERAGE OUALIF. AREA # BLDGS. BLIGHTED 0211821420034 15,964.45 537.42 0211821420034 R. & M. Milavetz $37,500 $0 $37,500 0 1,725 1,725 LC 0.34 15,000 0 0% 0 0 1011821130006 663,595.60 3,538.41 1011821130006 5000 FRANCE AVE N J. Talmage $20,500 $0 $20,500 0 472 472 LR 0.46 19,955 0 0% 1 0 0311821130011 105,842.00 1,447.59 0311821130011 State Land Department $400 $0 $400 0 0 0 LR 0.05 2,000 0 0% 0 0 0311821140034 14,085.83 521.38 0311821140034 3200 CO RD NO 10 Brooklyn Crossing $437,100 $437,100 $874,200 0 40,213 40,213 C 15,600 4.17 181,754 27000 15% 1 2 1011621130003 14,277.16 528.43 1011621130003 5001 DREW AVE N Sportsman Press $76,200 $8,800 $85,000 2,550 2,550 CC 3,118 0.50 21,780 3300 15% 1 2 2 0211821240019 178,487.00 2,077.01 0211821240019 25W CO RD NO 10 O. & E. Powell $3,008,100 $93,900 $3,100,000 141,000 141,000 CC 38,777 8.62 375,760 57000 15% 1 2 1011821120058 14,830.87 537.58 1011821120058 3305 53RD AVEN Brookdale10Apartments $790,000 $1,165,000 $1,975,000 67,150 67,150 A 42,180 8.70 381,360 58000 15% 1 6 6 1011821130042 210,791.90 1,811.47 1011821130042 5001 EWING AVE N B. Dabrowski $00,000 $84,000 $114,000 0 3,876 3,878 A 3,584 0.46 20,250 3100 15% 1 1 0211821320008 14,741.68 544.28 0211821320008 Brookdale $12,172,800 $34,846,900 $47,019,700 2,162,906 2,162,906 C 252,392 37.26 1,623,046 252392 16% 1 1 1 0311821140032 13,153.22 475.58 0311821140032 1206 BROOKDALE CENTER Midas Muffler $478 ,300 $82,600 $540,900 0 24,881 24,881 C 8,322 1.22 53,143 8322 18% 1 1 1011821130068 1011821130068 4902 FRANCE AVE N Broodlyn Pet Hospital $75,900 $47,300 $123,200 0 4,067 4,067 CC 2,483 0.58 25,312 4000 16% 1 1 1 0311621440033 11,962.67 459.71 0311821440033 5501 XERXES AVE N Goodyear Tire $447,500 $94,000 $541,500 0 23,309 23,309 CC 8,330 1.21 52,642 8330 16% 1 1 0311821410018 12,257.76 463.96 0311821410018 5515 XERXES AVE N Audio King $218,900 $73,400 $290,300 0 11,754 11,754 CC 4,044 0.59 25,519 4044 16% 1 1 0211821420032 12,257.76 483.98 0211821420032 5850 LILAC DR N Hofstad Building $153,700 $50,700 $204,400 0 7,802 7,802 CC 3,894 0.78 34,160 5500 16% 1 1 1011821130086 47,769.72 1,111.40 1011821130066 4906 FRANCE AVE N Standard Solvent $110,600 $47,300 $157,900 0 5,663 5,663 II 4,786 0.68 29,497 4786 16% 1 2 2 0311821140030 49,452.86 863.54 0311821140030 2950 CO RD NO 10 TCF Bards & Savings $294,600 $271,500 $566,100 26,041 28,041 C 4,355 0.84 36,824 6000 16% 1 1 1011821130059 43,421.48 823.60 1011821130059 3607 50TH AVE N Helix Machine $81,800 $23,100 $104.900 0 3,225 3,225 II 3,680 0.50 21,800 3680 17% 1 1 1 0311821440032 37,882.84 $33.34 0311821440032 5500 BROOKLYN BLVD Brookcials Car Wash $339,900 $77,200 $417,100 0 19.187 19,167 C 5,148 0.95 41,195 7000 17% 1 1 1011821130061 144,759.80 1,796.22 1011821130061 3701 50TH AVE N Happyville $56,300 $28,800 $85,100 0 2,553 2,553 II 2,580 0.34 15,000 2580 17% 1 1 1 0311821140033 138,273.70 1,481.46 0311821140033 3300 CO RD NO 10 Brooklyn Crossing $883,000 $1,152,000 $1,835,000 82,810 82,810 CC 11,426 3.29 143,395 25000 17% 1 1 0211821420035 48,15144 1,439.77 0211821420035 1915 57TH AVE N Milavetz & Associates $137,500 $80,000 $217,500 0 10,005 10,005 C 2,677 1.28 55,000 9877 18% 1 1 1 1011821130051 17,236.38 540.83 1011821130051 3816 50TH AVE N M. Kem, W. &. L. Bjerke $21,100 $92,000 $113,100 0 1,542 1,542 H TP 1,492 0.46 20,250 3708 18% 1 1 0211621420031 94,773.69 1,978.86 0211821420031 2121 57TH AVE N Anderson Drywall $57,800 $21,000 $78,800 0 2,364 2,364 CC 1,260 0.24 10,500 2000 19% 1 1 1 0311621440030 37,476.75 781.58 0311821440030 5445 XERXES AVE N Firestone Tire $368,500 $173,300 $541,800 0 24,923 24,923 C 8,335 1.00 43,350 $335 19% 1 1 211821420033 19,527.90 554.09 0211821420033 2105 57TH AVE N Champion Auto $383,100 $252,300 $635,400 0 27,828 - 27,628 CC 14,950 1.68 72,975 14950 20% 1 1 11821410013 16,954.89 539.48 0311821410013 5540 BROOKLYN BLVD Investors Savings $470,700 $602,600 $1,073,300 0 49,372 49,372 C 9,757 1.08 47,068 9757 21% 1 1 0311821140022 1,863.97 358.1)1 03 11 82 1 140022 5815 XERXES AVEN Westbrook Mall $3,225,500 $524,500 $3,750,000 170,900 170,900 CC 94,572 9.87 430,067 94572 22% 1 3 3 0311821440034 85,146.97 1,187.21 0311821440034 5425 XERXES AVE N Toys "R* Us $1,831,800 $939,700 $2,771,500 0 127,489 127,489 C 48,200 4.95 215,504 48200 22% 1 1 1011821110010 9.294.90 398.25 1011821110010 5139 BROOKLYN BLVD Brookdale Covenant Church $18 $77,400 $93,900 0 2,160 2,180 R 1,634 2.54 110,642 25000 23% 1 1 1 0211621310056 42,985.69 649.38 0211821310058 2501 CO RD NO 10 Kohl's $2,753,600 $1,777,500 $4,531,300 208,440 208,440 C 7300 0.00 305,980 73680 24% 1 1 1011821130060 48,591.92 910.74 1011821130060 3615 50TH AVE N Fun Services $56,300 $37,000 $93,300 0 2,799 2,799 11 3,680 0.34 15,000 3680 25% 1 1 1 0211821230022 125,125.80 1,526.02 0211821230022 5810 XERXES AVE N SL Paul Book $424,800 $427,600 $852,400 37,810 37,610 CC 14,824 0.13 56,646 14824 26% 1 1 1 1011821110011 32,449.56 728.77 1011821110011 5105 BROOKLYN BLVD Malmborgs Garden Center $192,800 $59.400 $252,200 0 3,783 3,783 F 56,285 4.90 213,444 58285 26% 1 3 3 0311821440028 0311821440026 1297 BROOKDALE CENTER Seers $5,746,400 $3,079,500 $8.825,900 405,991 405,991 C 194,918 16.48 718,304. 194918 27% 1 2 0311821140019 67,057.52 1,281.26 0311821140019 5701 XERXES AVE N Dayton's Home Store $1,135,800 $516,200 $1,852,000 0 75,992 75,992 C 39,501 3.18 137,670 39501 29% 1 1 1 1011821120057 1011821120057 3413 53RD AVEN Brookdale 10 Apartments $760,000 $1,140,000 $1.900,000 0 64,600 64,600 A 126,984 10.28 447,791 128984 29% 1 4 4 1011821130087 67,057.52 1,261.26 1011821130067 4900 FRANCE AVEN Mars Used Auto Paris $22,000 $37,400 $59,400 0 2,732 2,732 1 1,896 0.13 5,865 1696 29% 1 1 1 0211821320012 45,023.43 842.58 0211821320012 1200 BROOKDALE CENTER Carson Pife Scott $4,228.000 $2,006,800 $6,232,800 288,709 286,709 C 138,590 10.78 489,577 138590 29% 1 1 0211821130024 39,583.56 2,081.17 0211821130024 1910 57TH AVEN Northbrook $453,600 $539,500 $993,100 0 45,683 45,683 C 53,944 4.17 181,438 53944 30% 1 2 2 0211821230019 38,007.99 783.22 0211821230019 2920 CO RD NO 10 JoAnn Fabrics $379,400 $360.100 $739,500 0 34,017 34,017 C 14,790 1.09 47,425 14790 31% 1 1 1 0311821140001 79,008.55 1,214.79 0311821140001 5740 BROOKLYN BLVD Brookdale 10, Inc. $271,600 $237,900 $509,500 0 21,837 21,837 CC 13,588 1.00 43,450 13586 31% 1 1 1011821130065 14,680.09 542.30 1011821130085 4912 FRANCE AVE N Banning & Mulder $130,700 $140,300 $271,000 0 10,886 10,888 II 11,246 0.80 34,884 11248 32% 1 2 2 0211821230016 27,901.13 868.19 02111121230016 2810 CO RD NO 10 Health Central $1,285,200 $1,641,700 $2,926,900 0 134,637 134,637 C 55,750 3.47 151,200 55750 37% 1 1 1011821100062 44,353.56 862.27 1011821130082 3707 50TH AVE N Harkness Enginering $58,300 $65,600 $121,900 0 4,007 4,007 11 5,604 0.34 15,000 5804 37% 1 1 1 1011821130064 18,768.58 582.97 1011821130064 3721 50TH AVE N Macros Enginering $56,300 $65,600 $121,900 0 5,607 5,807 1 5,608 0.34 15,000 5808 37% 1 1 1 0211621130029 42,429.08 842.36 0211821130029 1900 57TH AVE N Acme Typewriter $104,900 $139,200 $244,100 0 9,629 9,829 cc 7,675 0.46 19,978 7875 39% 1 1 1 0211821230015 22,091.60 603.08 0211821230015 2802 NORTHWAY DR Four Courts $1,280,000 $4,032,000 $5,292,000 0 179,928 179,928 A 328,304 15.48 674,352 326304 49% 1 11 11 0211821230017 8,750.05 444.25 0211821230017 2901 NORTHWAY DR Norwest Banc $424,300 $184,100 $608,400 0 27,986 27,11W C 4,880 1.15 49,914 25000 50% 1 1 0311621410016 22,273.50 800.51 0311821410018 5512 BROOKLYN BLVD Kentrcky Fried Chicken $178,200 $144,400 $322,800 0 14,840 14,840 C 1,698 0.48 20,961 15000 72% 1 1 0211821320010 209,845.30 2,090.44 0211821320010 1285 BROOKDALE CENTER Dayton Tire $147,800 $384,100 $531,900 0 24,467 24,467 C 11,820 0.37 16 11820 73% 1 1 1 02118213200111,628,958.00 6,446.23 0211821320011 1100 BROOKDALECENTER Dayton's $1,125,200 $4,936,300 $6,061,500 0 278,829 278,829 C 195,388 2.87 125,017 97684 78% 1 1 0211821420004 12,792.53 525.27 0211821420004 1901 57TH AVE N Super America $76,200 $98,000 $174,200 0 8,013 6,013 C 1,742 0.33 14,520 12000 83% 1 1 1 0311821140026 18,785.03 565.30 0311821140028 5825 XERXES AVE N F & M $435,600 $351,000 $766,600 0 36,164 38,184 C 6,051 2.50 108,900 90000 83% 1 1 0311821410014 14,818.02 545.16 0311821410014 5532 BROOKLYN BLVD Taco Ball $253,300 $177,200 $430,500 0 19,803 19,803 C 2,208 0.66 29,803 25000 84% 1 1 0211621320009 14,603.88 542.79 0211821320009 1265 BROOKDALE CENTER J. C. Penny $737,100 $3,961,200 $4,698,300 0 216,122 216,122 C 70,160 1.88 81,892 70160 86% 1 1 1 0211821310055 14,786.05 544.54 0211821310055 Equitable Real Estate $2,124,600 $0 $2,124,800 97,732 97,732 C 6.50 283,280 250000 88% 1 0 0311821410020 0311821410020 5525 XERXES AVE N McDonald's $431,300 $371.300 $802,600 0 36,920 36,920 C 4,459 1.16 50,742 45000 89% 1 1 0311821410021 22,103.38 654.07 0311821410021 Wendy's $150,500 $0 $150,500 0 6,923 6,923 LC 0.38 16,719 15000 90% 1 0 0211821130026 0211821130026 1950 57TH AVE N Northbrook $232,400 $18,200 $248,800 0 11,436 11,436 C 12,500 2.13 92,969 85000 91% 1 1 1 0311821410022 35,086.33 976.23 0311821410022 5545 XERXES AVE N Wendy's $391,800 $199,400 $591,200 0 27,195 27,195 C 3,025 1.00 43,529 40000 92% 1 1 0311821140021 35,088.33 976.23 0311821140021 5710 XERXES AVEN Union 76 $342,000 $51,000 $393,000 0 18,078 18,078 C 1,360 0.87 38,000 35000 92% 1 1 0311821410002 35,088.33 976.23 0311821410002 5601 XERXES AVE N Bakers Square $367,200 $297,900 $665,100 0 30,595 30,595 C 4,157 0.99 43,200 40000 93% 1 1 0311621410015 35,088.33 976.23 0311821410015 5524 BROOKLYN BLVD 50 Grill $412,000 $223,000 $635,000 0 27,610 27,610 CC 4,980 1.11 48,476 45000 93% 1 1 0311821410001 29,889.35 857.05 0311821410001 5820 BROOKLYN BLVD Marquette Bank $730,300 $788,000 $1,518,300 0 68,242 68,242 CC 11,679 2.10 91,290 85000 93% 1 1 0311821410019 5,854.27 330.24 0311821410019 Warner Holding Co. $0 $0 $0 0 0 0 K 0.16 6,880 6500 94% 1 0 0211821130025 25,537.27 775.55 0211821130025 Northbrook $21,700 $0 $21,700 0 998 998 C 1.09 47,626 45000 94% 1 0 0211821130028 0211821130028 1912 57TH AVE N Northbrook $73,500 $0 $73,500 0 3,381 3,381 C 0.34 14,692 14000 95% 1 0 0211821230021 0211821230021 Equitable Real Estate $3,000 $0 $3,000 136 138 C 0.00 314 300 98% 1 0 0311821140024 0311821140024 5801 XERXES AVEN Jerrys New Market $1,671,400 $106,600 $1,778,000 0 60,186 80,188 CC 30,922 4.80 208,930 200000 96% 1 1 1 1011821130063 1011821130063 3715 50TH AVE N Mikros Enginering $56,300 $166,200 $222,500 0 8,635 8,835 11 14,495 0.34 15,000 14495 97% 1 1 1 0211821130027 0211821130027 2000 57TH AVEN Northbrook $98,400 $150,200 $248,800 0 11,438 11,436 C 2,364 0.38 18,393 16000 98% 1 1 0311821410017 0311821410017 Warner Holding Co. $0 $0 $0 0 0 0 K 0.92 39,952 39000 98% 1 r 0 O TALS 4,992.484.08 62,479.81 TOTALS $55.821,600 $70,255.800 $126,077,400 0 5,638,185 5,638,185 2,128,069 202.50 9,182.864 97.22% 72 70 91 58 9145929 0.8153846154 0.99597587 BRKDALE2.WK1 12113194, 02:59 PM TIF DISTRICT NO.3 -SITE C CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA PID # AREA PERIMETER PID # HOUSE # STREET NAME PROP NAME/OWNER LAND VALUE BLDG. VALUE TOTAL VALUE TAX CAP HOMESTEAD PROP TYPE BLDG AREA AREA ACRES AREA SO FT IMPROVED AREA COVERAGE QUALJF. AREA # BLDGS. BLIGHTED 3511921130011 387,597.40 5,173.69 3511921130011 Shingle Creek Land Company $408 ,500 $0 $406,500 18,791 LC 6.25 272,354 0 0% 0 0 40853.1 3611921130033 32,310.84 891.82 3611921130033 M. & B. Nelson $111,000 $0 $111,000 5,106 LC 0.85 37,008 0 0% 0 0 5551.2 3611921130010. 48,640.47 957.61 3611921130010 $508 CAMDEN AVE N P. & K. Peterson $17,500 $30,900 $46,400 484 H R 816 0.22 9,375 0 0% 0 1 1 1406.25 3611921130029 3611921130029 D. Champagne $101,300 $0 $101,300 4,660 C 0.52 22,498 0 0% 0 0 3374.7 3611921130031 39,227.24 860.92 3811921130031 M. & B. Nelson $44,900 $0 $44,900 2,065 LC 0.34 14,967 0 0% 0 0 2245.05 3611921130032 189,707.50 2,002.18 3611921130032 M. & B. Nelson $47,000 $0 $47,000 2,182 LC 0.36 15,661 0 0% 0 0 2349.15 3611921130107 52,273.46 915.35 3611921130107 E. Fuerstaturg $35,000 $0 $35,000 805 LR 1.85 80,766 0 0% 0 0 12114.9 3511921410015 500,189.60 3,126.47 3511921410015 Shingle Creek Land Company $195,000 $0 $195,000 8,970 LC 1.12 48,758 0 0% 1 0 7313.7 3811921130108 104,311.50 3,326.64 3611921130108 6525 WILLOW LA N EDA of Brooklyn Center $90,000 $270,000 $300,000 0 A 5,070 1.13 49,105 0 0% 0 1 7365.75 3611921130110 53,579.13 1,142.32 3811921130110 M. & S. Fiterman $279,500 $0 $279,500 12,857 LC 2.14 93,186 0 0% 0 0 13974.9 3611921130112 9,499.99 390.55 3611921130112 PDQ Steres of Minnesota $108,000 $0 $108,000 4,968 LC 0.83 38,003 0 0% 0 0 5400.45 3811921420017 649.11 104.39 3811921420017 R. Gilbertson $239,000 $0 $239,000 10,994 LC 3.13 136,548 0 0% 0 0 20482.2 3511921420010 685.24 104.45 3511921420010 Mr. Ems Systems, Inc. $221,900 $0 $221,900 10,207 LC 1.27 55,483 0 0% 0 0 8322.45 3611921130079 277,210.00 2,398.10 3611921130079 R. & D. Zrtre & R. Scherer $257,000 $0 $257,000 11,822 LC 1.97 85,657 0 0% 0 0 12848.6 3511921240003 702.13 106.89 3511921240003 Shingle Creek Lend Company $762,300 $0 $762,300 35,066 LC 13.09 570,193 0 0% 0 0 85529 3611921420018 220,505.40 2,485.02 3611921420018 City of B.C. $79,500 $0 $79,500 0 LC 0.81 26,538 0 0% 0 0 3980.4 3511921220051 503.32 92.47 3511921220051 Shingle Creek Land Company $288,100 $0 $288,100 13,253 LC 4.41 192,068 0 0% 0 0 28810.2 3511921220010 50132 92.47 3511921220010 Tomorrow Food $117,400 $0 $117,400 5,400 LC 2.16 93,913 0 0% 0 0 14087 3511921130020 579.42 100.00 3511921130020 Shingle Creek Land Company $448,700 $448,700 20,840 LC 4.12 179,477 0 0% 0 0 28921.0 3511921230002 605.95 100.57 351.1921230002 Shingle Creek Land Company $430,800 $0 $430,600 19,808 LC 4.94 215,297 0 0% 0 0 32294.8 3611921130106 141,908.80 1,989.54 3611921130106 Riverwood Townhome Assoc. $0 $0 $0 0 K 2.32 100,970 15200 15% 1 0 15145.5 3611921130028 555.50 96.94 3611921130026 419 67TH AVE N L & P. Zeller $16,500 $47,000 $63,500 635 H R 1,128 0.22 9,600 1450 15% 1 1 1 1440 3811 21 31001 7 699.85 107.21 3611921310017 6330 COLFAX AVE N R. & C. Evellus $16,600 $48,800 $65,200 652 H R 1,040 0.22 9,792 1480 15% 1 1 1468.8 3611921320065 599.31 100.59 3611921320065 6325 GIRARD AVE N K. &A. Stem $17,500 $49,100 $66,600 666 H R 1,072 0.23 9,975 1512 15% 1 1 1496.25 11921130008 623.47 101.15 3611921130008 6500 WEST RIVER RD Brookdale Motel $295,000 850 $42,500 $337,500 13,925 C 3,600 1.35 59,000 9000 15% 1 1 1 8 11921320059 603.88 102.18 3811921320059 6330 GIRARD AVE N Y. & N. Panji $17,500 $52,100 $89,800 696 H R 1,040 0.23 9,975 1524 15% 1 1 1496.25 11921310011 727.28 107.69 3611921310011 6331 COLFAX AVE N. N. Benson $16,800 $42,900 $59,500 595 H R 932 0.22 9,792 1500 15% 1 1 1488.8 3811921310014 61,297.91 991.09 3811921310014 6336 DUPONT AVE N R. & M. Lane $18,600 $45,300 $61,900 619 H R 932 0.22 9,792 1500 15% 1 1 1468.8 3611921320056 650.46 104.24 3611921320056 8331 FREMONT AVE N H. Ziegler $17,500 $43,600 $61,100 611 H R 932 023 9,975 1532 15% 1 1 1498.25 3811921420007 19,238.85 585.88 3611921420007 201 65TH AVE N Lyn -River Apartments $60,000 $150,000 $210,000 7,140 A 10,191 0.74 32,175 5000 16% 1 1 1 4826.25 3611921420008 638.84 103.45 3611921420008 207 65TH AVEN Lyn -River Apartments $60,000 $150,000 $210,000 7,140 A 10,191 0.74 32,175 5000 16% 1 1 1 4828.25 3611921310045 543.81 95.49 3811921310045 6305 CAMDEN AVE N Chippewa Pak Apartments $919,600 $3,480,400 $4,400,000 149,600 A 78,290 12.50 544.665 85000 18% 1 7 7 81699.8 3611921240047 491.18 94.89 3611921240047 700 66TH AVE N Georgetown Townhomes $690,000 $2,300,000 $2,990,000 101,660 A 86,216 10.93 476,238 75000 16% 1 24 24 71435.7 3511921130019 321,195.90 2,314.54 3511921130019 2100 FREEWAY BLVD MN State High School League $278,300 $1,201,100 $1,477,400 0 C 10,248 1.49 65,013 10248 16% 1 1 9751.95 3611921130011 32,870.11 844.00 3811921130011 8500 CAMDEN AVE N H. & S. Davis $17,500 $50,900 $68,400 684 H R 1,431 0.26 11,250 1783 16% 1 1 1 1887.5 3611921420012 32,372.55 788.80 3611921420012 6409 WILLOW LAN Lyn -River Apartments $60,000 $150,000 $210,000 7,140 A 10,181 0.81 35,200 5800 16% 1 1 1 5280 3611921130080 32,405.59 788.02 3811921130080 412 66TH AVE N Schell Dental Clinic $108,000 $99,300 $207,300 7,936 CC 3,189 0.48 20,000 3189 16% 1 1 3000 3611921420011 11,470.95 437.45 3811921420011 $417 WILLOW LAN Lyn -River Apartments $60,000 $150,000 $210,000 7,140 A 10,191 0.78 33,858 5600 17% 1 1 1 5078.7 3611921240046 12,188.84 449.08 3611921240048 6507 CAMDEN AVE N Chippewa Perk $52,400 $191,800 $244,000 8,298 A 2,205 0.98 41,909 7000 17% 1 3 3 6286.35 3611921320068 11,820.38 445.96 3811921320068 8324 HUMBOLDT AVE N L Olson $17,500 $45,700 $63,200 632 H R 1,072 0.23 9,975 1672 17% 1 1 1496.25 3611921130009 12,461.36 455.09 3611921130009 6512 CAMDEN AVE N M. WNtisrns $17,500 $39,700 $57,200 572 H R 838 0.22 9,375 1576 17% 1 1 1 1406.25 3611921420013 11,428.15 437.11 3611921420013 6401 WILLOW LAN Lyn -River Apartments $60,000 $150,000 $210,000 7,140 A 10,191 1.07 46,592 7891 17% 1 1 1 6988.8 3811921320013 10,640.53 42411 3611921320013 8300 FREMONT AVE N G. & E. Smith $17,500 $42.400 $59,900 599 H R 912 0.23 9,975 1712 17% 1 1 1496.25 3811921420016 9,230.21 403.47 3811921420018 8357 LILAC DR N Lynbrook Bowl $570,100 $285,400 $855,500 39,353 C 28,518 3.74 162,914 28518 18% 1 1 1 24437.1 3611921130027 8,917.40 394.86 3611921130027 6525 WEST RIVER RD Beim Bowl $224,500 $57,600 $282,100 11,377 CC 8,080 1.03 44,902 8080 18% 1 1 1 8735.3 3611921310016 10,710.72 426.43 3611921310016 6331 BRYANT AVE N M. Taylor $17,500 $54,200 $71,700 717 H R 1,352 0.23 10,200 1872 16% 1 1 1 1530 3611921420009 3611921420009 215 65TH AVE N Lyn -River Apartments, $60,000 $150,000 $210,000 7,140 A 10,191 0.66 37,675 7000 19% 1 1 1 5651.25 3811921130111 10,038.14 418.69 3811921130111 6550 WEST RIVER RD Atkins Plumbing & Heafing $282,400 $2,000 $284,400 13,082 C 2,589 1.18 51,353 10000 19% 1 1 1 7702.95 3811921320002 9,630.00 408.82 3611921320002 6337 DUPONT AVE N S. & A. Arradordo $17,500 $41,900 $59,400 594 H R 912 0.22 9,375 1864 20% 1 1 1406.25 3611921320010 160,448.50 1,649.07 3811921320010 8331 EMERSON AVE N L Schroeder $17,500 $63,400 $80,900 898 H R 1,288 0.23 10,050 2013 20% 1 1 1507.5 3511921410003 9,965.60 417.92 3511921410003 1501 FREEWAY BLVD Park Inn $1,275,500 $1,614,000 $2,889,500 131,317 CC 120,858 6.89 300,128 60428 20% 1 1 1 450192 3611921320008 33,831.56 795.25 3811921320008 6338 EMERSON AVE N C. & I. Demo $17,500 $42,900 $80,400 604 H R 912 0.23 10,050 2058 20% 1 1 1507.5 3611921420010 10,809.82 430.01 3811921420010 $425 WILLOW LAN Lyn-River Apartments $60,000 $150,000 $210,000 7,140 A 10,191 0.61 26,442 5600 21% 1 1 1 3988.3 3611921420015 9,652.82 409.48 3611921420015 8351 LILAC OR N Schwelenberg Interiors $189,400 $103,500 $292,900 11,873 CC 12,296 1.24 54,128 12296 23% 1 1 1 8119.2 3511921140008 8,489.84 392.45 3511921140008 1800 FREEWAY BLVD St. Paul Properties $1,202,300 $824,100 $2,028,400 91,614 11 97,660 7.36 320,601 97660 30% 1 1 48090.2 3511921140011 10.440.22 429.82 3511921140011 1600 FREEWAY BLVD Spec #1 and #2 $957,200 $654,700 $1,611,900 74,147 1 81,008 5.66 255,261 81008 32% 1 2 38289.2 3611921130030 10,116.56 417.83 3611921130030 430 65TH AVE N Lynbrook Body Shop $49,000 $91,000 $140,000 4,840 CC 4,000 0.25 10,969 4000 36% 1 1 1 1645.35 3511921420003 10,011.27 415.06 3511921420003 6415 JAMES CIR N Budgetel Motel $686,100 $1,081,400 $1,787,500 61,305 C 12,900 3.00 130,687 60000 46% 1 1 19603.1 3511921220052 10,121.39 419.17 3511921220052 2800 FREEWAY BLVD Associated Insurance $173,000 $412,300 $585,300 28,924 C 6,968 1.22 53,240 25000 47% 1 1 7986 3511921410018 10,017.22 416.44 3511921410018 1601 JAMES CIRN Olive Garden $499,700 $683,300 $1,183,000 54,418 C 9,100 2.41 105.192 50000 48% 1 1 15778.8 3511921410019 9,557.56 406.63 3511921410019 1501 JAMES CIR N Cracker Bartel $639,600 $336,300 $975,900 44,891 C 9,752 4.20 182,744 90000 49% 1 1 27411.6 3511921220005 10,401.77 429.78 3511921220005 Egkdtec Real Estate Investors $1,270,200 $0 $1,270,200 58,429 C 8.33 362,931 180000 50% 1 0 54439.7 3511921130013 568,857.10 2,971.85 3511921130013 Shingle Creek Land Company $119,900 $0 $179,900 8,275 LC 1.38 59,950 45000 75% 1 0 8992.5 3511921220011 128,050.10 1,505.23 3511921220011 6870 SHINGLE CREEK PKW Palmer Lake Plaza $186,500 $362,300 $548,800 25,245 C 48,300 1.14 49,754 48300 97% 1 1 7463.1 3511921220008 252,944.60 2,014.33 3511921220008 6860 SHINGLE CREEK PKW Palmer Lake Plaza $125,000 $610,100 $735,100 32,215 CC 65,942 0.77 33,330 32932 99% 1 1 4999.5 3511921220007 3511921220007 6650 SHINGLE CREEK PKW Palmer Lake Plaza $149,700 $299,600 $449,300 20,666 C 39,935 0.92 39,918 39935 100% 1 1 5987.4 3511921410014. 3511921410014 1601 FREEWAY BLVD Roger & Lynda Fritz $229,300 $373,000 $602,300 28,108 CC 1.05 45,856 ? 7 1 3511921410008 3511921410008 8440 JAMES CIRCLE NORTH James & Joan Madden $921,500 $839,700 $1,781,200 79,415 CC 4.03 175,524 ? ? 1 ` 3511921420006 3511921420006 6445 JAMES CIRCLE NORTH Willow Company Ltd Partners $563,400 $1,068,600 $1,832,000 75,072 CC 2.49 108,607 ? ? 1 3511921130008 3511921130006 2101 FREEWAY BOULEVARD SAH Partnership $509,000 $341,000 $850,000 39,100 C 2.12 92,550 7 7 1 3511921130012 3511921130012 2200 FREEWAY BOULEVARD Plaza Real Estate Partners $1,195,400 $3,820,600 $5,016,000 230,736 C 6.46 281,286 ? 7 1 3511921240005 3511921240005 2300 FREEWAY BOULEVARD The Salvation Army $315,400 $1,044.900 $1,360,300 0 CC 1.80 78,843 ? ? 1 3511921240004 3511921240004 2400 FREEWAY BOULEVARD Jeanne SdxrdO $817,200 $680,200 $1,497,400 67,280 CC 4.69 204,296 ? ? 1 3511921230001 3511921230001 2700 FREEWAY BOULEVARD First Industrial Reely Trust $1,267,500 $1,101,800 $2,369,300 108,988 1 7.76 338,025? ? 1 GALS 3,918,716.93 51,907.55 TOTALS $21,781,100 $26,062,900 $47,844,000 1,885,899 784,711 171.87 7,478,883 66 47 85 53 Garages not 5,244,050 Included 0.70118091 0.623529 WILL2522.WK1 12113194, 03:03 PM Council Meeting Date 12/19/94 3 City o f Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number Request For Council Consideration Item Description: CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING RE: CERTAIN TABLED PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990 -10, 69TH AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION Department Approval: ��\ X CV Pu y-___ pector, Director OYTNblic Services Manager's Review /Recommendation: i -- No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: 1) Staff presentation. 2) Hold public hearing. 3) Discuss. 4) Choose to assess or to discontinue further consideration of assessment. 5) If choose to assess, designate assessments (either as proposed or at residential rate) and consider resolution certifying special assessments. • Summary Explanat on: (supporting documentation attached Yes ) At the November 28, 1994 Council meeting, the City Council was asked to either remove, from further consideration or to set a date for a continued public hearing to consider certifying tabled assessments on five properties on 69th Avenue. The proposed assessments for the five properties on the south side of 69th immediately west of the City water tower were tabled and not certified when the Council certified the assessments for Improvement Project No. 1990 -10, 69th Avenue Reconstruction. These five properties are zoned R3, but are currently used as R1. The City's policy has always been that assessments are based on zoning, not use, because the project benefit is to the land, not to the use. Examples of recent projects include the Freeway Boulevard project, where three residential properties in a C2 zone were assessed the commercial rate, and the France /Lakebreeze /50th project, where single family residential properties in C2 and R5 zones were assessed as zoned. A proposed levy roll showing the five properties in question is attached. As with all R3 properties, the proposed assessments are based on front footage times the standard R3 rate divided by the number of units - in this case, $21.00 per foot times the applicable frontage divided by one, the number of units on the property. For the Council's information, the residential unit assessment at that time was $1,415. The question before the Council is whether these properties ought to be treated as single family properties, or as they are zoned. If, for example, one or more of the houses were burned down, or if a private developer came in and bought up properties, demolished the existing houses, and combined the properties, the owner(s) would legally be able to build a townhouse development on that property. If the properties were down zoned • to R1, there would be a loss in value to the owners, a damages would be in order. If the Council desires to treat the properties as they are used rather than as they are zoned, a precedent would be set which would allow other owners of properties in similar situations to contest their assessments. As a final option, the Council could find that there was no benefit to the properties, and discontinue further consideration of assessments to these properties. Member introduced the following resolution and • moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed Special Assessment Levy No. 12809, Hennepin County Project No. 2085 for the following improvement: 69TH AVENUE NORTH RECONSTRUCTION BROOKLYN BOULEVARD TO SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990 -10 WHEREAS, an assessment roll, a copy of which is attached hereto and part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk, tabulating those properties where a street improvement account is to be assessed with the amount, including interest and service charges, to be assessed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. Such proposed assessment, Special Assessment Levy 12809, Hennepin County Project No. 2085, made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of nine (9) years as indicated on the assessment roll. The first of the installments to be payable with ad valorem taxes in 1995, and shall bear interest at the rate of nine (9) percent per annum for a period of thirteen months from December 1, 1994 through December 31, 1995. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to the certificate of the assessment to the County Auditor pay the whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he or she may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount RESOLUTION NO. • of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest shall be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION TERMINATING FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON CERTAIN PROPERTIES, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990 -10 69TH AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, the City Council on September 20, 1993 conducted a public hearing regarding proposed special assessments for Improvement Project No. 1990 -10, 69th Avenue Street Reconstruction; and WHEREAS, based on property owner objection to certain proposed special assessments, the City Council tabled further consideration of special assessments on those five properties; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is no longer in the public interest to consider special assessments on these parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. Further consideration of special assessments for Improvement Project No. 1990 - 10 on the following parcels is hereby terminated: • PID # 34- 119 -21 -21 -0029 PID # 34- 119 -21 -21 -0004 PID # 34- 119 -21 -21 -0005 PID # 34- 119 -21 -21 -0006 PID # 34- 119 -21 -21 -0007 2. Staff are hereby authorized and directed to removing the pending special assessment status from the above referenced parcels for the above referenced project. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: • whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SP9AL ASSESSMENT ROLL December 19,1994 I PROJECT INFORM LEVY INFORMATION Improvement Project No.: 1990 -10 Levy No.: 12809 Hennepin Co. Project No.: 2085 Description: Reconstruction of 69th Ave N Fund /Code No.: 9027 -1370 Levy Description: 69TH AVE N. 90 -10 I Levy runs nine (9) years at an interest rate of Location: 69th Avenue from Brooklyn Boulevard nine (9) percent. to Shingle Creek Parkway First payment, with property taxes payable in 1995 Improvement Hearing Date: March 26,1990 shall include thirteen (13) whole months' interest. Improvement Ordered On: March 26,1990 Date of Assessment Hearing: September 13, 1993 By Resolution No.: 90 -66 Hearing Continued on: December 19,1994 Adopted On: Assessment District: N/A By Resolution No.: Method of Apportionment: Corrections. Deletions. Or Deferments: Cost Summary From Resolution No: 92 -286 TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: $7,645,920.00 Less Direct City Share: Less Other Payments: TOTAL TO BE ASSESSED: $12,628.77 City Property: Other Public Property: Private Property: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL LEVY NAME MUNICIPAL CODE NO. 22 HENNEPIN OWNER ADDITIONAL NOTIFICATION LEVY COUNTY PROPERTY ADDN. PROPERTY ASSESSED Name Name NO. PROJ. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. AMOUNT Address Mailing Address Mailing Address 12809 2085 34- 119 -21 -21 -0004 89100 $1,578.57 4001 69th Ave N CHRISTOPHER JOELSON Lot 3 4001 69th Ave N AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 025 Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 12809 2085 34- 119 -21 -21 -0005 89100 $3,157.35 4101 69th Ave N GUMPERT & JOYCE GRUENKE Lot 3 4101 69th Ave N AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 025 Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 12809 2085 34- 119 -21 -21 -0006 89100 $3,157.14 4011 69th Ave N HAZEL DAWSON Lot 3 4011 69th Ave N AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 025 Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 12809 2085 34- 119 -21 -21 -0007 89100 $3,157.14 3955 69th Ave N RICHARD DAWSON Lot 3 3955 69th Ave N AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 025 Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 12809 2085 34- 119 -21 -21 -0029 89726 $1,578.57 4007 69th Ave N TRUMAN & JEAN HANSEN REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 0806 4007 69th Ave N $12,628.77 Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Council Meeting Date 12/19/94 Cray of f Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: Initial Application for Private Kennel License at 6312 France Avenue North Department Approval: Gerald G. Splinter, City N&ager Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Render a final decision reversing, affirming, or amending the decision of the city manager to deny a private kennel license application to keep three dogs submitted by Patricia Shogren and Bradley Shogren, 6312 France Avenue North. If the city council chooses to affirm the decision of the city manager to deny a private kennel license, the council should include in the motion that the applicant • has until January 27, 1995, to come into compliance with City Ordinances which require no more than two dogs on the premises. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached Yes ) Chapter 1 of the Brooklyn Center City Ordinances requires the licensing of all private kennels, defined as any premise zoned or used for R1 and R2 purposes on which three or more dogs or four or more cats six months old or older are kept or harbored as pets and not for selling, boarding, showing, treating, grooming, or other commercial purposes. Section 1- 105.5b requires the city manager to approve or deny the application based on the Public Health Sanitarian's report and written comments by the applicant and any affected persons, and Section 1- 105.5c outlines the standards for approval. Section 1- 105.5b reads, "within fourteen (14) days after the notice of the city manager's decision is mailed to area property owners, the owner or any other affected person may request a hearing before the city council to show cause why the city manager's decision should be changed." The city manager denied the application for private kennel license submitted by Patricia Shogren and Bradley Shogren; however, they have until January 27, 1995, in which to come into compliance with City Ordinances which allow for not more than two dogs on their premises. Consequently, they have requested a hearing before the city council to show cause why the decision should be changed. • Following is a calendar of events from receipt of application to request for public hearing: Request For Council Consideration Page 2 October 4, 1994 • Received application for private kennel license to keep three dogs from Patricia Shogren • and Bradley Shogren, 6312 France Avenue North. October 6, 1994 • Sent memorandum to Acting Police Chief Scott Kline requesting a records check to verify any complaints on these dogs. • Sent memorandum to Building Official Clay Larson requesting a sanitation inspection be completed and a recommendation be submitted. • Mailed notice of receipt of application for private kennel license to owners of property within 150 feet of the applicant's property as required by Section 1- 105.5a of the Brooklyn Center City Ordinances. • Sent letter to applicant informing them of the City's receipt of their private kennel license application and notifying them that notices have been mailed to property owners within 150 feet of their property. October 11, 1994 • Received report from Acting Police Chief Scott Kline regarding records check. • October 18, 1994 • Received report from Building Official Clay Larson regarding sanitation inspection. October 19, 1994 • Received one written response from an area property owner requesting the private kennel license not be issued. October 26, 1994 • City manager sent letter to Patricia Shogren and Bradley Shogren denying application for private, kennel license. • Mailed notice of denial of application for private kennel license to owners of property within 150 feet of the applicant's property as required by Section 1- 105.5b of the Brooklyn Center City Ordinances. October 28, 1994 • Received letter from Bradley Shogren requesting a public hearing before the city council as allowed by Section 1- 105.5b. • Request For Council Consideration Page 3 November 4, 1994 is • Sent letter to Patricia Shogren and Bradley Shogren including the public hearing notice which was mailed to area residents. • Mailed notice of public hearing to owners of property within 150 feet of the applicant's property. November 14 and 17, 1994 • Received two written responses from area property owners in support of private kennel license. December 6, 1994 • Received one written response from an area property owner requesting the private kennel license not be issued. December 7, 1994 • Public hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun -Post. December 19, 1994 • • City Council holds public hearing on initial application for private kennel license. 0 • CHAPTER 1 - ANIMALS Section 1 -101. DEFINITIONS. The following terms, when used in this ordinance, have the meanings ascribed to them: 1. Animal. Animal means dogs and cats. 2. Animal Control Officer. Animal Control Officer means that person or agency designated by the City Manager to control the keeping of animals within Brooklyn Center. 3. At large means an animal that is off the property of its owner and not under restraint. 4. Commercial Kennel. Commercial Kennel means any place limited to C2, I -1 and I -2 zoning districts where the business of keeping, raising, selling, boarding, breeding, showing, treating, or grooming of dogs and other animals is conducted, including pet shops, animal hospitals and other similar establishments. 5. Family. Any of the following definitions shall apply: a. A person or persons related by blood, marriage, or adoption, together with any domestic servants or gratuitous guests, maintaining a common household in a dwelling unit; . b. Group or foster care of not more thar. six (6) wards or clients by an authorized person or persons, related by blood, marriage, or adoption, together with any domestic servants or gratuitous guests, all maintaining a common household in a dwelling unit approved and certified by the appropriate public agency; C. A group of not more than five (5) persons not related by blood, marriage, or adoption maintaining a common household in a dwelling unit. 6. Owner. Owner means any person or the parent or guardian of a person under 18 years of age who owns, keeps, or has custody of an animal in the City of Brooklyn Center. 7. Person. Person means any person, firm, corporation, partnership, joint venture or association. 8. Private Kernel means any premises zoned or used for Rl and R2 purposes, as defined in the Brooklyn Center City Ordinances, on which three or more dogs or four or more cats six months old or older, are kept or harbored as pets and not for selling, boarding, showing, treating, grooming or other commercial purposes. 9. Under Restraint means an animal that is controlled by a leash or at • heel beside a competent person having custody of it and obedient to that person's commands, or within a vehicle being driven or parked on a public street, or if it is within the property limits of its owner's premises. • Section 1 -102. LICENSES REQUIRED. 1. Dog Licenses. No person shall own, harbor, keep or have custody of a dog over six months of age within the City of Brooklyn Center unless a current license for such dog has been obtained as provided in this ordinance. Each license shall be valid for the duration of the effective period of the dog's rabies vaccine as stated in the Compendium of Animal Rabies Vaccines published by the Conference of State Public Health Veterinarians and the Center for Disease Control of the Department of Health and Human Services. Dogs kept in a commercial kennel need not be individually licensed. 2. Commercial Kennel License. Every person operating a commercial kennel shall annually obtain from the City Clerk, upon authorization by the City Council, a commercial kennel license. Commercial kennel licenses shall be posted in a conspicuous place within the licensed premises. 3. Private Kennel License. Every person operating or maintaining a private kennel shall annually obtain from the City Clerk, upon authorization by the City Council, a private kennel license. Section 1 -103. LICENSE FEES. The license fee for each dog license, each commercial kennel license, each private kennel license, each duplicate license, each renewal license, each impounding penalty, and the late penalty described herein shall be as set forth by City Council resolution. 1. Late Penaltv. If any license required hereunder is obtained while the dog is impounded by the City, or after the required licensing period has commenced, there shall be added to the regular license fee, a late license penalty as set forth by City Council resolution, provided, however, that any person who acquires a dog after the start of a license year, or any person who owns, keeps, harbors, or has custody of a dog at the time of becoming a resident of the City, shall be allowed 30 days to secure a license, without incurring any late license penalty. 2. Refunds Prorating and Transfers No dog license fee, commercial kennel license fee, or private kennel license fee shall be refunded or prorated, the provisions of Chapter 23 of Brooklyn Center Ordinances notwithstanding. No license required hereunder shall be transferrable. Section 1 -104. VACCINATION REQUIRED. The owner of every dog in Brooklyn Center shall cause such dog to be currently vaccinated for rabies. A certificate of vaccination or other statement of the same effect executed by a licensed veterinarian shall constitute prima facie proof of the required vaccination. Section 1 -105. APPLICATION PROCEDURES AND ISSUANCE OF LICENSES. Applications for all licenses required by this ordinance shall be made to the City Clerk. 1. Do7- License. The application for a dog license shall include the name and address of the owner of the dog and such other information as the City Clerk shall require. All applicants shall be of legal age. • Applicants shall provide a certificate issued by a doctor of veterinary medicine showing that the dog has been vaccinated against rabies, the type of vaccine used, and the length of time the vaccination is effective. 1 -105 2. Issuance of Dog License. Upon receipt of the application, the license fee and proof of a rabies vaccination, the City Clerk shall issue a metallic license tag bearing the license number, the name of the City and the year and month when the license period ends. The dog shall continuously wear a collar or harness to which the license tag is firmly affixed. It shall be unlawful for any person to make or use a counterfeit tag. 3. Replacement of Lost Dog License If any dog license tag is lost or stolen, the applicant may obtain a new tag by surrendering the license payment receipt and by paying the charge for a duplicate license as set forth by City Council resolution. 4. Application for Commercial Kennel License. a. Initial application for a commercial kennel license shall be made to the City Clerk. The application shall state the name and address of the applicant, the property address or legal description of the proposed kennel location, a sketch or drawing of the proposed kennel describing construction, operation, and the approximate number of animals to be confined therein, together with their age, breed, and sex, and together with the applicable license fee. b. Hearing_ Required. A commercial kennel license application shall be referred to the Public Health Sanitarian who shall review the kennel design and operation and make a recommendation to the City Council on . the adequacy thereof. Applications for commercial kennel license shall be placed on the agenda of the City Council for a public hearing at the regular City Council meeting next following 14_days after the application is received. Not less than seven (7) days before the date of the public hearing, the City Clerk shall mail notice of the hearing to the applicant and to the owners of property within 150 feet of the proposed kennel location. The failure of any owner to receive such notice shall not invalidate the proceedings. C. Council Approval. The City Council may approve the commercial kennel license and may attach to such approval any conditions necessary to insure compliance with this ordinance, with Chapter 19 of City Ordinances, and any other condition necessary to protect the health, safety, welfare, and property values in the immediate area. The City Council may deny a commercial kennel license upon finding that the establishment of the kennel would constitute a public nuisance, or would adversely affect the health, safety, welfare or property values of the person residing, living, or owning property within the immediate area. The form of approval for a license shall be the resolution of approval, a certified copy of which shall be forwarded to the applicant. 1 -105 d. Renewal of License. A copy of the commercial kennel license shall be forwarded to the City Clerk who shall maintain a register of kennel licenses. Subject to any time limitation set by the City Council, the license shall be valid for a period of one year and until October 1 of the then current calendar year and shall be renewable on October 1 of each year thereafter by the City Clerk upon payment of a renewal license fee set forth by City Council resolution, only in the event no complaint regarding the kennel's operation has been received during the license year. In the event that no revocation of the license is made or contemplated by the City Council, the license shall be renewable as set forth in this subdivision. e. License Revocation. In the event a complaint has been received by City officials, a report thereof shall be made to the City Council by the City Clerk and the City Council may direct the applicant to appear to show cause why the license should not be revoked. A license may be revoked for violation of this ordinance, Chapter 19 of the Brooklyn Center Ordinances, or any condition imposed at the time of issuance. 5. Application for Private Kennel License. a. Initial application for a private kennel license shall be made to the City Clerk. The application shall state the name and address of the applicant, the property address or legal description of the proposed kennel location, a sketch or drawing of the proposed kennel • describing construction, operation, and the approximate number of animals to be confined therein, together with their age, breed, and sex. Proof of current rabies vaccination and City dog license for each animal and the applicable license fee must accompany the application. Not less than seven (7) days after receipt of the application for a private kennel license, the City Clerk shall mail notice of the license application to the owners of property within 150 feet of the proposed kennel location. The failure of any owner to receive such notice shall not invalidate the proceedings. b. Consideration Process. A private kennel license application shall be referred to the Public Health Sanitarian who shall review the kennel design and operation and make a recommendation to the City Manager on the adequacy thereof. Within fourteen (14) days after the notice of application is mailed to area property owners, the City Manager or the City Manager's designee shall review the Public Health Sanitarian's report, consider written comments by the applicant and any other affected persons, and either approve or deny the application. Within fourteen (14) days after the notice of the City Manager's decision is mailed to area property owners, the owner or any other affected person then may request a hearing before the City Council to show cause why the decision should be changed. A written request for the hearing must be received by the City Manager within such fourteen (14) days. Following the public hearing, the City Council shall render a final decision reversing, affirming, or . amending the decision of the City Manager. 1 -105 C . Standards for Approval. The City Manager may approve the private kennel license and may attach to such approval any conditions necessary to insure compliance with this ordinance, with Chapter 19 of the City Ordinances, and any other condition necessary to protect the health, safety, welfare, and property values in the immediate area. The City Manager may deny a private kennel license upon finding that the establishment of the kennel would constitute a public nuisance or would adversely affect the health, safety, welfare or property values of the person residing, living, or owning property within the immediate area. The form of approval for a license shall be a memorandum of approval from the City Manager outlining any conditions necessary to insure compliance. d. Renewal of License. A copy of the private kennel license shall be forwarded to the City Clerk who shall maintain a register of kennel licenses. Subject to any time limitation set by the City Manager, the license shall be valid for a period of one year and until October 1 of the then current calendar year and shall be renewable on October 1 of each year thereafter by the City Clerk upon payment of a renewal license fee set forth by City Council resolution, only in the event no complaint regarding the kennel's operation has been received during the license year. In the event that no revocation of the license is made or contemplated by the City Manager, the license shall be renewable as set forth in this subdivision. e. License Revocation. In the event a complaint has been received by City officials, a report thereof shall be made to the City Council by the City Clerk and the City Council may direct the applicant to appear to show cause why the license should not be revoked. A license may be revoked for violation of this ordinance, Chapter 19 of the Brooklyn Center Ordinances, or any condition imposed at the time of issuance. Section 1 -106. STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE KENNELS. A private kennel shall consist of an enclosed space in which all animals are confined when not under restraint and constructed so as to prevent the animals from running at large. Provision must be made to provide shelter during inclement weather. Every private kennel shall be kept in good repair and shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. It shall be unlawful to maintain a private kennel in a way which constitutes a violation of this ordinance, a nuisance under Chapter 19 of the City Ordinances, or in violation of any condition imposed by the City Council at the time the license is granted. Section 1 -107. STANDARD FOR COMMERCIAL KENNELS. All commercial kennels shall be designed, operated and maintained according to the following standards: 1. Commercial kennel floors and walls shall be constructed of impervious materials and all structures, areas, and appurtenances shall be designed to facilitate thorough and convenient cleaning. Commercial kennels shall be adequately ventilated and all doors, windows, and other openings to the outside shall be screened, May through October. The commercial kennels shall be provided with adequate and potable water supplies and shall be equipped with sewer facilities. Plans for all new commercial kennels and repairs or alterations to existing commercial kennels must be filed with and approved by the City's Public Health Sanitarian as a condition of the license. 2. Operating Standards. The licensee, its agents and employees shall operate and maintain the kennel in accordance with standards set out in Title 9, Chapter 1, Subchapter A, Part 3, Section 3.100 through 3.106 of the United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, a copy of which is adopted by reference. Section 1 -108. KEEPING OF DOGS IS LIMITED. No family or family member shall keep, harbor or have custody of more than two dogs exceeding six months of age in the family dwelling unit or on the family premises without obtaining a private kennel license. Provided, however, the said family or family member may obtain a private kennel license for the purpose of providing a period of time, not to exceed three years, in which to find a place where the dogs can be legally, safely, and humanely harbored. Section 1 -109. KEEPING OF CATS IS LIMITED. No family or family member shall keep, harbor or have custody of four or more cats exceeding six months of age in the family dwelling unit or on the family premises without obtaining a private kennel license. Provided, however, the said family or family member may obtain a private kennel license for the purpose of providing a period of time, not to exceed three years, in which to find a place where the cats can be legally, safely, and humanely harbored. Section 1 -110. NUISANCE PROHIBITED. It shall be unlawful for any person to keep an animal in any unsanitary place or condition, or in a manner which results in noisome odors, or in any way which constitutes a nuisance or a disturbance by reason of barking, howling, fighting, or other noise, or to maintain or permit a condition which unreasonably annoys, injures, or endangers the safety, health, morals, comfort, or repose of any person or property. Section 1 -111. RUNNING AT LARGE PROHIBITED. It shall be unlawful for any owner to allow its animal to run at large. Section 1 -112. ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER. The City Council may provide for a City Animal Pound, either within or outside the corporate limits and may provide for an Animal Control Officer to enforce this ordinance. Section 1 -113. ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES. The Animal Control Officer may capture and impound any animal running at large, and any unlicensed dog. Section 1 -114. QUARANTINE. Any animal, including wild animals that have bitten a person shall immediately be impounded for at least 10 days and kept apart from other animals, under the supervision of a veterinarian, until it is determined whether such animal had or has a disease which might have been transmitted by such bite. Such impounding may be done by the owner, and need not be at the pound designated by the City, but if it is not at the designated pound, the owner shall notify the police department immediately and shall furnish proof in writing that such animal is being so impounded. Upon the expiration of 10 days, if it is determined that the animal does not have a disease which might have been transmitted by such bite, it may be released, and the police department shall be notified immediately prior to such release by the owner of the animal. If the animal is impounded at the designated pound, it may be reclaimed as hereinafter provided. Any animal which has been bitten by a rabid animal shall be killed or impounded and kept in the same manner for a period of six months; provided that if the animal which has been bitten by a rabid animal has been vaccinated at least three weeks before such bite and within one year of such bite and if it is again immediately vaccinated, then such animal shall be confined or impounded for a period of 40 days before it is released. The owner of an animal which has been bitten by a rabid animal shall notify the police department immediately prior to the release of any such animal. Section 1 -115. DANGEROUS ANIMALS. If an animal is diseased, vicious, dangerous, rabid or exposed to rabies and such animal cannot be impounded after a reasonable effort or cannot be impounded without serious risk to any person or persons, or if the animal has made more than one attack on a person or persons, such animal may be immediately killed by or under the direction of a police officer. Section 1 -116. TREATMENTS DURING IMPOUNDING. Any animal which is impounded in the designated pound shall be kept in accordance with Section 1 -106 of this ordinance. If the animal is not known or suspected of being diseased and has not bitten a person or been bitten by a rabid animal, it shall be kept in the pound for at least five days, unless it is sooner reclaimed by its owner. If such animal is known to be or is suspected of being diseased with a disease which might be transmitted to persons, it shall be kept in the pound for at least 10 days. Section 1 -117. REDEMPTION OF IMPOUNDED ANIMALS. Any animal may be redeemed from the pound by the owner upon payment of the following: 1. The license fee for the animal, if the license has not previously been obtained. 2. The late- license penalty, where a license has not been previously obtained. 3. The amount of the boarding fee which the City is required to pay the pound keeper. 4. An impounding penalty as set forth by City Council resolution. The City Manager or the City Manager's designee may waive the late- license penalty and the impounding penalty for persons other than the owner in cases of sale in accordance with Section 1 -118 of this ordinance. Section 1 -118. DISPOSAL OF UNREDEEMED ANIMALS. The City's designated pound keeper shall make an effort to contact the owner of any animal which has been impounded and which has identification on it. If at the end of the impounding period the animal is not reclaimed by the owner, such animal shall be deemed to have been abandoned and may be disposed of or sold to any person following the procedures contained in Minnesota Statutes 514.93 relating to the sale of unclaimed animals by veterinarians. If the animal is to be kept in this City, a license shall be obtained by such person before possession of the animal is given to the purchaser. Section 1 -119. ABANDONMENT. It shall be unlawful for any person to abandon any animal, including wild animals in Brooklyn Center. Section 1 -120. PENALTY. Any person violating the provisions of this ordinance, or any conditions of a license, shall, upon conviction thereof, be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine of not more than $700 or to imprisonment for a period not to exceed 90 days, or both, together with the costs of prosecution. Each day that a violation exists shall constitute a separate offense. APPLICATION FOR PRIVATE KENNEL LICENSE OCT 0 4 1994 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA TO THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL Date: 1. Applicant's Name and Telephone Number SHo �� A �M 533-- > (Last, First, Middle) (Telephone Number) 2. Applicant's Address k1je, mss. B.0 (Number, Street, City, State, Zip Code) 3. Address or Legal Description of Proposed Kennel S Cc�� 4. Attach a sketch or drawing with this application describing the construction and operation of the proposed kennel, or, if the animals are to be confined within the family dwelling unit, indicate this on the application. rAu L _Q u:C-U , T 5. Indicate number of animals to be confined within the proposed kennel, together with their asze, breed and sex. SU1 kLL Mt 2 L� ? w11 W1 �L� �. ��2 ►�YS o �. . 6. PLEASE NOTE: Proof of current rabies vaccination and City dog license for each animal and the license fee ;in t7-t of $30.00 must accompany this application. Si ra re of Applicant PLEASE RETURN COMPLETED APPLICATION AND LICENSE FEE TO: City Clerk, City of Brooklyn Center, 6301 Shingle Creek Par':raay, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430. DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE n Ne w License J Renewal License License Period through License Fee Received C E R T I F I C A T E O F R A B I E S V A C C I N A T I O N issued by GEHRMAN ANIMAL HOSPITAL AND CLINIC ------------------------------------------- 12720 Wayzata Blvd. Maple Plain Minnetonka, MN 55305 MN 55359 (612) 545 -9161 (612) 479 -1550 Owner...:PAT SHOGREN 6312 FRANCE N. CRYSTAL, MN 55429 Phone ... :(612) 533 -8365 Animal..:TYRA Age......02 Years Weight..: 66 1b oz 29.9 K Breed... :LAS/ SPRINGER Color ...:BLACK Species.:C_ANINE Sex ..... :SPAYED FEMALE Vaccination Given: 9/12/94 Revaccination: Due: 9112196 Todav's Date: 9/12/94 Tag x....33384 I.- !� TO CERT - -Y that we have vaccinated the described animal a Rabies, with. Imrab (TM), a Killed Virus Vaccine, Hamster Cell Line Origin, manu factured by Merieux Labor atories, Inc. VACCINATION SERIAL T � - " 12101 * * * ** Charles _. Lehrman D.V.M. Robert S. Gehrman D.V.M. Kenneth Kirchgessner, D.V.M. XHospit - Embosse Kaaren Howes D.V.M. �� Certified Vaccination Seal C E R T I F I C A T E O F R A B I E S V A C C I N A T I O N issued by GEHRMAN ANIMAL HOSPITAL AND CLINIC ------------------------------------------- 12720 Wayzata Blvd. Maple Plain Minnetonka, MN 55305 MN 55359 (612) 545 -9161 (612) 479 -1550 Owner ... :PAT SHOGREN 6312 FRANCE N. CRYSTAL, MN 55429 Phone ... :(612) 533 -8365 Animal..:BUCKLEY Age ..... :01 Years Weight..: 150.00 lb 68.04 K Breed ... : LA3 /X Color ... :YELLOW Species.:CANINE Sex ..... :NEUTERED MALE Vaccination Given: 9/12/94 Revaccination Due: 9/12/96 Today's Date: 9/12/94 Tag ,, ....33373 THIS IS TO C that we have vaccinated the described animal against Rabies, with Imrab (TM), a Killed Virus Vaccine Hamster Cell Line Origin manufactured by Merieux Laboratories, Inc. x * *x VACCINATION SERIAL r 12101 X * ** x * x Charles F. Gehrman, D.V.M. Robert S. Ge hrman, D . V . N? . Kenneth Kirchgessner, D.V.M. Hossital Embossed Kaaren Howe, D.V.M. Certified Vaccination Seal C E R T I F I C A T E O F R A B I E S V A C C I N A T I O N t issued by GEHRMAN ANIMAL HOSPITAL AND CLINIC ------------------------------------------- 12720 Wayzata Blvd. Maple Plain Minnetonka, MN 55305 MN 55359 (612) 545 -9161 (612) 479 -1550 Owner..: PAT SHOGREN 6312 FRANCE N. CRYSTAL, MN 55429 Phone..: (612) 533 -8365 Animal.: ORBY DOB....: 8/22/93 Breed..: ROTTWEILER Color... ELK Species: CANINE Sex..... SPAYED FEMALE Vaccination Given: 3/09/94 Revaccination: Due: 3/09/95 Todav's Date: 9/12/94 Tag rr... 32192 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that we have vaccinated the described animal against ;rabies, with Imrab (TNT), a Killed Virus Vaccine, Hamster Cell Line Origin, manufactured by Merieux Laboratories, Inc. * * ** VACCINATION SERIAL # 12101 * * * ** Charles - Ge ^_man, D.V.i%:. x Robert S. Ga -Tan, D.V.M. Kenneth x_rc cessner, D.V.M. * Hostiital Embossed Kaaren Lowe, D.V.M. - Certified Vaccination_ Seal * PEA' LICENSE License Tag No. q Expires — /2 ' 9 M 5 33- k Z bs Name C C, lwf�i Dat CV Addres Zt SY 'Z % Amount Received $ J Ln Ln g Name of Animal ` �! M arkin ( — a �`�— GT Male _ emale � Unsexed ¢� J O 4 4 I hereby acknowledge receipt of amount indicated above. being the amount due for pet license for one pet as described above. You are authorized to keep said pet without further payment until Pet Tax for nett fiscal year becomes due. By PEA' LICENSE License Tag N o, Expires Name Date z Address �' '� � "" L • %'r ' r 'Y!G!� L" ' -> > y V Amount Received J � Name of Animal � [ Male remale 1-r-,--Unsexed Q3 V / J � � 4 h \ cv 4 , /z a. l t✓i Vi C�, C/ c /��� I hereby acknowledge receipt of amount indicated above. being the amount due for pet license for one pet as describe•,- above. You are authorized to keep said pet without further payment until Pet Tax for nest fiscal year becomes due. 66 / .lvi + t GLi Grr.c�' PEA' LICENSE License i aci E x p ires_ 2 /Z l 5 33 -F3 6 5 Name Date _ c(D Lam" Address �' 3j�^ C /'c�rul S5 YZ Amount Received r—! Name of Anima( Markings cZl> �it�Mafe C1 Female Unsexed m ` -Z IQ / / TI 1 I hereby acknowledge receipt of amount indicated above, being the amount due for pet license for one pet as described abov You are authorized to keep said pet without further payment until Pet Tax for next fiscal year becomes duie. ��j 7 • MEMORANDUM TO: Scott Kline, Acting Chief of Police FROM: Sharon Knutson, Deputy City Clerk DATE: ctober 6 1 O 99 4 SUBJECT: Private Kennel License Application for 6312 France Ave. N. On October 4, 1994 I received an application for a private kennel license from Patricia Mae Shogren, 6312 France Avenue North, to keep three dogs. According to City Manager Jerry Splinter, a records check must be completed to verify any complaints on these dogs. Please check your records for complaints and send the report to me by October 14, 1994. Thank you for your cooperation. i MEMORANDUM TO: Clayton Larson, Building Official FROM: Sharon Knutson, Deputy City Clerk DATE: October 6, 1994 SUBJECT: Private Kennel License Application for 6312 France Ave. N. On October 4, 1994 I received an application for a private kennel license from Patricia Mae Shogren and her son, Bradley James Shogren, telephone number 533 -8365, to keep three dogs. According to City Manager Jerry Splinter, a sanitation inspection by the inspection department must be completed and a recommendation must be submitted to him. Brad Hoffman has requested me to have you schedule an • inspection of this property and submit the report to me by October 14, 1994. Should you have any questions relevant to this inspection, please contact Brad. Thank you for your cooperation. cc: Brad Hoffman City of Brooklyn Center A great place to start. A great place to stay. October 11 1994 NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF APPLICATION FOR PRIVATE KENNEL LICENSE TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please take notice that the city clerk of the City of Brooklyn Center is in receipt of an application for private kennel license to keep three dogs. APPLICANT: PATRICIA MAE SHOGREN BRADLEY JAMES SHOGREN 6312 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA City Ordinance Section 1- 105.5a requires the city clerk to mail notice of the license application to the owners of property within 150 feet of the proposed kennel location. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this notice, the city manager will approve or deny the license application based on the code enforcement officer's report and tip KITTEN comments by the applicant or any affected person. Direct written comments to City Clerk, City of Brooklyn Center, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, 55430. All information provided in the written comments becomes public information; however, if you wish to remain anonymous, you may do so and the city manager will take that into consideration. Notice of approval or denial will be mailed to owners of property within 150 feet of the proposed kennel location. Questions or concerns regarding the private kennel license application should be directed to Deputy City Clerk Sharon Knutson at 569 -3306. 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 • City Hall & TDD Number (612) 569 -3300 Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD plumber (612) 569 -3400 • FAX (612) 569 -3494 An Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunities Employer Private Kennel License Area residents within 150' of 6312 France Avenue North TIMOTHY WALTERS GAROLD WEIZENEGGER HELEN OSBORN WENDY WALTERS ROXANNE WEIZENEGGER 6306 FRANCE AVE N 6313 FRANCE AVE N 6324 FRANCE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 ERIC DUPLESSIE THERESA WILMES CHARLES BOONE 6300 FRANCE AVE N 6325 FRANCE AVE N JANET BOONE BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 6319 FRANCE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 SAMIR ABUMAYYALEH HAMADEH ABUMAYYALEH VICKY ROMUALD 6315 FRANCE AVE N NIMATA ABUMAYYALEH 6301 FRANCE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 6307 FRANCE AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 0 MARCIA CROMER GREGORY ASHLESON PATRICIA HOLTZ 6331 BROOKLYN BLVD CARRI PROECHEL 6319 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 6325 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 TENANT /OCCUPANT DONALD BLOM 6315 BROOKLYN BLVD 6301 BROOKLYN BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 BROOKLYN CENTER i,1N 55429 i City of Brooklyn Center A great place to start. A great place to stay. October 11, 1994 Ms. Patricia Mae Shogren Mr. Bradley James Shogren 6312 France Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Dear Ms. Shogren and Mr. Shogren: Your application for a private kennel license, license fee, and proof of current rabies vaccination and dog license for each animal have been received by the City of Brooklyn Center. Within the next fourteen (14) days, the City inspector will visit your home to complete a sanitation inspection. Please be advised the enclosed notice has been mailed to area property owners within 150 feet of your home. The city manager will consider your application for a private kennel license and either approve or deny it based on the City inspector's report and any written comments from you or affected persons. You will be notified of the city manager's decision. Should you have any questions relevant to your private kennel license application, please call me at 569 -3306. Sincerely, ` lt^3'., Sharon Knutson Deputy City Clerk CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER enc. cc: C ity Man G erald G. Splin 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 • City Hall & TDD Number (612) 569 -3300 Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number (612) 569 -3400 • FAX (612) 569 -3494 An Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunities Employer MEMORANDUM TO: Scott Kline, Acting Chief of Police 0' FROM: Sharon Knutson, Deputy City Clerk DATE: October 6, 1994 SUBJECT: Private Kennel License Application for 6312 France Ave. N. On October 4, 1994, I received an application for a private kennel license from Patricia Mae Shogren, 6312 France Avenue North, to keep three dogs. According to City Manager Jerry Splinter, a records check must be completed to verify any complaints on these dogs. Please check your records for complaints and send the report to me by October 14, 1994. Thank you for your cooperation. City of Brooklyn Center A great place to start. A great place to stay. • MEMORANDUM TO: SHARON KNUTSON FROM: Clay Larson, Building Official DATE: 10 -18 -94 RE: KENNEL LICENSE, 6312 FRANCE AVE N I have inspected the referenced premises and found it to be clean and sanitary. There are three dogs present. They appear to be in good health and well cared for. 6301 Shingle Creek Pkw , Brooklyn Center, A V 55430 -2199 - City Hall & TDD Number (612) 569 -3300 Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number (612) 569 -3400 - FAX (612) 569 -3494 An Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunities Employer RECEIVED OCT 19199k I aw �.41 `1 !lam -✓Y-�/ iti''�'-' C / /.�C�3"L..i n (.cam ✓{ R N�?��,1 --- ,.�, �^ .y-�: % i� �..i`_�„� ��! -� J • BRADLEY I SHOGREN REIC"EI F-D 0 U T 2 5 1931 6312 France Avenue North • Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 (612) 533 -3365 Mr. Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, iVIN 55430 October 24, 1994 Dear Mr. Splinter: The letter is in regard to our application for a private kennel license. The city inspector has visited our house, and has seen that we have good dons and good conditions for them. y I want to emphasize that these dogs are not for breeding have been spayed or neutered. These three dogs are home pets; beyond the basic obedience training they all received, these dogs are not used for hunting, show, or other sport. As I told the inspector, these dogs, in particular Orby, our rottweiler, have been trained from birth that they are subordinate to people. I am well aware of a rottweiler's strength, and thus have never permitted Orby to win at any game. Without exception she loses every game, and is, as many dog experts have told me, a much better dog, as she knows she has NEVER dominated me or any guest in my home. Perhaps this example may not mean much to you in your decision. However, I know in my heart that all of these dogs are well- behaved, extremely good with our neighbors' children, each other, and other doffs. I also know that we do everything we can for these dogs, and they are well - behaved as a result. Though I understand the ordinance, I feel it is intended to keep bad owners from having bad dogs. Our dogs are extremely important in our lives, and we give them a great deal of love, respect and attention. I run two miles with them daily. The dogs are inside when we are away. I am committed to the safety of our dogs and our neighbors, and do everything possible to make sure that these dogs cause no harm or nuisance to anyone. My family has resided in Brooklyn Center since 1968. 1 enjoy living here, and am currently training for the Brooklyn Center Fire Department. Chief Boman or many other firefighters can tell you this is something I have wanted to do since I was a small child growing up here, and I now look forward to serving the city. I think this is a statement about my character and the way I lead my life, which influences how I treat my dogs, the law and our community. These dogs are a big part of our life. We will do everything necessary to comply with the ordinance. I appreciate your attention to this matter, and look forward to your decision. Sincerely, BRADLEY I SHOGREN City of Brooklyn Center A great place to start. A great place to stay. • October 26, 1994 Ms. Patricia Mae Shogren Mr. Bradley James Shogren 6312 France Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Dear Ms. Shogren and Mr. Shogren: On October 4, 1994, I received your application for private kennel license. In accordance with Brooklyn Center City Ordinances, notices of the license application were mailed to property owners within 150 feet of the proposed kennel. After considering public comments received, please be informed that I am denying your request for a private kennel license to house three or more dogs on your residential premises. You will be allowed until January 27, 1995, to come into compliance with City Ordinances which require no more than two dogs on your premises. I find that the issuance of this license would have an adverse affect on the health, safety, welfare, or property values of persons residing, living, or owning property within the immediate area. I base this finding on the intent of the Citv Ordinances to limit animals in residential areas and written public comments received. You should also be aware there are other City Ordinances which require Brooklyn Center residents to control barking and other nuisances generated by the keeping of pets, such as dogs, on their property. We expect all citizens will be in compliance with these requirements. Dog owners are particularly responsible for barking of their dogs and causing a nuisance to their neighbors. In other situations where dons have had a propensity to bark some owners have chosen to use special collars which inhibit and discourage dogs from barking. You may wish to consider this type of equipment as it does appear that a "barking dog problem" exists at your residence. If violations occur in the future, you could be subject to enforcement action. 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Brooklyn Center, .tiiY 50430 -2199 • City Hall & TDD Number (612) 569 -3300 Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number (612) 569 -3400 • FAX (612) 569 -3494 An AfTzrmative Action /Equal Opportunities Employer Ms. Patricia Shogren -2- October 26, 1994 Mr. Bradley Shogren Under Brooklvn Center Citv Ordinances, the City Managers decision in these matters is appealable to the City Council. To institute this appeal process, you must submit to my office. within 14 days of receipt of this notice, a written request for a hearing before the Citv Council. Should you choose the appeal option, the City Council will hold a public hearing on your appeal after mailed notice to adjoining property owners. Should you have any questions with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to give me a call at 569 -3300. Sincerely, Gerald G',-'Splinter City ManaLyer CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER GGS:sk cc: Sharon Knutson • City of Brooklyn Center A great place to start. A great place to stay. October 26, 1994 NOTICE OF DENIAL OF APPLICATION FOR PRIVATE KENNEL LICENSE TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please take notice that the city manager of the City of Brooklyn Center has denied an application for private kennel license for Ms. Patricia Shogren and Mr. Bradley Shogren, 6312 France Avenue North. The city manager based his decision on the intent of the City Ordinances to limit the keeping of animals in residential areas and written comments received by affected persons. • City Ordinance Section 1- 105.5b requires the city clerk to mail notice of the city manager's decision to approve or deny the applicant's private kennel license application to the owners of property within 150 feet of the proposed kennel location. The owner or any other affected person may request a hearing before the city council to show cause why the decision should be changed. A `VRITTEN request for the hearing must be received by the city manager within fourteen (14) days of the date of this notice. Direct written requests to City Clerk. 6301 Shingle Creek Parlwav, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, 55=130. If a written request for a public hearing before the city council is received, notice of the date and time of the public hearing will be mailed to owners of property within 150 feet of the proposed kennel location. Following the public hearing, the city council shall render a final decision reversing, affirming, or amending the decision of the city manager. Questions or concerns reaardina the private kennel license application denial should be directed to Deputy City Clerk Sharon Knutson at 569 -3306. • 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Brooklyn Center, MN 65430 -2199 • City Hall & TDD Number (612) 569 -3300 Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number (612) 569 -3400 • FAX (612) 569 -3494 An Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunities Employer BRADLEY JAMES SHOGREN RECEIVED OCT 2 8199i; 6312 France Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 • (612) 533 -8365 Mr. Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 October 27, 1994 Dear Mr. Splinter: 1 hereby inform the City of Brooklyn Center that I am appealing your denial of October 26, 1994 for a kennel license to my mother, Patricia M. Shogren, and me. I hereby request from the City of Brooklyn Center all public information pertaining to this case that is in the possession of the City of Brooklyn Center or any of its employees, including but not limited to the one anonymous letter from our neighbor, the city inspector's report to the city manager, and a record from the Brooklyn Center Police Department of any complaints of barking, bites or other public nuisance. 'NIV understanding is that no such complaints exist; in either case, I request from the City written confirmation that such is the case. I would also . like to have any and all other information from any other sources that influenced your decision to denv this license. As I train for the Brooklyn Center Fire Department on Monday and Thursday evenings, I hereby request that the City schedule a hearing on another day, or on these days only after my training is complete, after December 12, 1994. I appreciate your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, BRaDLE J. SHOGREN City of Brooklyn Center A great place to start. A great place to stay. i s November 4, 1994 Ms. Patricia Shogren Mr. Bradley Shogren 6312 France Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Dear Ms. Shogren and Mr. Shogren: Enclosed is a copy of the public hearing notice being mailed to area property owners within 150 feet of your property. As stated in the notice, the public hearing will be held on Monday, December 19, 1994, at approximately 7:30 .m. PP P You are not required to be present at the public hearing, but you may wish to attend so you can answer any questions the city council may have. Should you have any questions relevant to the public hearing, please call me at 569 -3306. • Sincerely, Sharon Knutson Deputy City Clerk CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER enc. cc: City Manager Gerald G. Splinter 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Brooklyn Center, MN 5 7 5430 -2199 • City Hal' &- TDD Number (612) 569 -3300 Recreation and Community Center Phone &: TDD Number (612) 569 -3400 • FAX (612) 569 -3494 An AffirmatiLe Action /Equal Opportunities Employer City of Brooklyn Center • A great place to start. A great place to stay. November 4, 1994 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Monday, December 19, 1994 Council Chambers City Hall 7:30 p.m. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please take notice that the city manager of the City of Brooklyn Center has t received a written request for a public hearing before the City Council to show cause why the city manager's decision to deny the private kennel license for Patricia Shoaren and Bradley Shoaren, 6312 France Avenue North, should be changed. The City Council will make its decision based on the City inspector's report, any written comments by the applicant and any affected persons, and anyone wishing to address the Council at the public hearing. Attendance is not required; however, if you would like to express your concerns or comments directly to the City Council, you are encouraged to attend. If you are unable to attend the City Council meeting, written comments should be directed to the City Council. Following the public hearing, the City Council shall render a final decision reversing, affirming, or amending the city manager's decision. Questions or concerns regarding the public hearing should be directed to Deputy City Clerk Sharon Knutson at 569 -3306. 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Brooklyn Center, AIN 55430 -2199 • City Hall & TDD Number (612) 569 -3300 Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number (612) 569 -3400 • FAX (612) 569 -3494 An Affirmative Action lEqual Opportunities Employer RECEI VED N O V 1 4 194 &12 .- France 19 k • /V Qil e Gv� lit. NA c h rd - The a1tt vLeh°i l n,,,t og t tl- _- 7Cn <r tG! the �ja Gk; f a�� . Z Gt t2 amt b307 a` d d�sZ f c th -c CzLlgs to the L Ohtw �'GGkcs tGun�, j e r7k 1�arh .� arVh rrs GLrt ru �ac i� and the czc9s de rtat • ��stv� -b b es a t /i'1 n a ` zz 1.r /vcn-La�Cz: � y leer �CGa�rf� Z1 �y aj^z JU �'f errG�l f• -Z"�' have an ����sr� ovu �Ce z /'� , rVI mo 1,4? ,I R FCi /�/ �1 Novambvr 11 1994 TO: City Council of Brooklyn Center RE: Kennel License a pp lic at ion denial for Shogren, 6312 France Ave N Brooklyn Center MN 55423 We are writing this letter in support of Patricia and Brad Shogrens' application for a kennel license, we live across the street and have absolutely no complaints about the dogs. The Dogs are friendly, our children play with them and the Shogrens are responsible dog owners. We were disappointed to find that their application was denied. We would like to ask the city council to reconsider. Sincerely, Ja A, Done t rt J. Cariveau r 6 France Ave N B" oklyn Center MN 55429 I � • ECEIVEO DEC ,��2 -� 3, / �1 1 `� RECEIVED DEC 61991; .......... . I V , A�l NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center will hold a public hearing on Monday, December 19, 1994, at approximately 7:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an application for private kennel license submitted by Patricia Shogren and Bradley Shogren, 6312 France Avenue North. BRIEF STATEMENT OF CONTENTS OF APPLICATION: Application for a private kennel license to keep three dogs at the residence at 6312 France Avenue North in Brooklyn Center. Sharon Knutson Deputy City Clerk CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER (Published in the December 7, 1994, Brooklyn Center Sun - Post.) • Co mcil Meeting Date 12/19/94 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda It= Number Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: RESOLUTION FINALIZING THE CITY MANAGER'S APPOINTMENT OF A CHIEF OF POLICE Department Approval: erald G. Sp ' e , ity Manager Manager's Review/Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report 2 Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: The City Manager recommends the City Council's favorable consideration of the attached resolution finalizing the appointment of Scott Kline as Chief of Police for the City of Brooklyn Center • Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached ) The City Council authorized an internal recruitment process for filling the vacancy of chief of police. As part of that process, the position opening was posted internally and we received two internal applications for the position. Both candidates participated in an assessment process by Harry Brull, Licensed Psychologist, Personnel Decisions, Inc. The candidates were also interviewed by a department -head panel which consisted of: Director of Public Services Diane Spector, Director of Community Development Brad Hoffman, Director of Finance Charlie Hansen, and Fire Chief Ron Boman. The candidates also participated in an interview panel by community members which consisted of. Brooklyn Park Chief of Police Don Davis, Brooklyn Center Financial Advisory Commission Chairperson Donn Escher, Brookdale Manager Linda Smith, and Brooklyn Center Schools Superintendent Dennis Morrow. Both candidates also participated in an oral interview panel made up of ten members of the police department; those members were selected by their peers. The police department interview panel consisted of Police Officers Dick Fryer, Steve Karris, Bob Traxler, and Gary Coleman; Investigator Bob Dirks; Sergeant Steve McComb; and civilian panel members Dispatcher Jean Dorweiler and Investigation Secretary Velma Throldahl. After all assessment and interview processes were complete, I met with Harry Brull to discuss the results and the findings of the interview and assessment processes for both candidates. Based on the results of the assessment process combined with information and results of all interviews, I'm requesting the City Council pass the attached resolution finalizing the appointment of Scott Kline as Chief of Police. Scott has been a member of the police department since 1966. His work and dedication to the police department and our community, along with his skills as captain and acting chief of police, prepare him for • his appointment to the chief position for Brooklyn Center. I believe Scott Kline is very qualified to assume the position of chief of police for Brooklyn Center based on past work performance, experience, and the results of the interview and assessment process. Again, I recommend that you finalize my appointment of chief of police effective December 19, 1994. Member introduced the following resolution and • moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION FINALIZING THE CITY MANAGER'S APPOINTMENT OF A CHIEF OF POLICE WHEREAS, Chief of Police Trevor Hampton resigned in October 1994; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has selected Scott Kline as the new Chief of Police effective December 19, 1994; and WHEREAS, Section 6.02, Subdivision 3. (a), of the Brooklyn Center City Charter requires the City Council to finalize this appointment by a majority vote of the Council before the appointment becomes official. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the City Manager's appointment of Scott Kline as Chief of Police is hereby finalized effective December 19, 1994. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Meeting Date /,2 / / 9 /9 7 City of Brooklyn Center A Item Numb" /� b Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: Resolutions for Adoption of the 1995 Annual Budget and 1995 Capital Improvements Plan Department Approval: l Charlie Hansen, Finance Director Manager's Review/Recommendation: d 1P No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Passage of the attached resolutions Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached ) Attached are a series of resolutions which adopt budgets for all city funds and the capital improvements plan. These budgets and the C.I P. were i nil in e submitted to the City Council a series of agenda p ack ets • P g y g beginning on September 30 with the gray covered Proposed 1995 Annual Budget and concluding with two small special revenue funds, the Diseased Tree Removal Fund and the Community Development Block Fund, who's budgets are included for the first time in this packet. The City Council reviewed these documents over the last two months and did make changes which are incorporated into the resolutions in this agenda. The following changes from the proposed budgets have been made: 1. After preparation of the Proposed Budget, the State notified us of increases in Homestead and Agricultural Aid (HACA) of $19,507 for the General Fund and $469 for the H.R.A. This results in a reduction in revenue for property taxes of $19,976 and an increase in revenue for intergovernmental revenue of $19,976. Only these changes were represented in the numbers presented by City Staff at the Truth in Taxation Hearings. 2. Staff also recommended increasing appropriations in the City Council by $25,000 for the Image Campaign, and appropriations in the City Manager's Department by $3,000 for dues to the North Metro Highway 100 Council. The City Council decided at a worksession that the purchase of as additional squad car to increase the Police fleet by one was unnecessary. This cut reduces appropriation in the Police Department by $20,060. These three changes increase total General Fund appropriations by $7,940. 3. Staff has identified additional revenues of $2,500 in Licenses and Permits and $5,440 State Aid for Police pensions. 4. In the E.D.A. Budget, the estimate for Community Development Block Grants has been reduced by $7,860 and the estimate for rental income has been increased by $19,900 and the appropriation for contractual services increased by $12,040. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1995 PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE CENTRAL GARAGE INTERNAL SERVICE FUND WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is required by Charter and state law to adopt an annual budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center as follows: 1. The Central Garage revenues will consist of the following estimated amounts during 1995: Fees charged to other City departments $1,381,485 Investment earnings 75,000 Auction proceeds 18,500 Total Revenues $1,474,985 2. The appropriations for the Central Y Garage fund for the year 1995 shall be: Personal services $214,091 Supplies 232,450 Repair & maintenance services 32,000 Contractual services 17,201 Insurance 25,000 Depreciation 560,853 Capital outlay 393,390 ------- - - - - -- Total Appropriations $1,474,985 Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk RESOLUTION NO. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. IOU 0 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1995 PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS AND THE ENTERPRISE FUNDS WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is required by Charter and state law to adopt an annual budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the budgets for the following funds for the year 1995 shall be: 1. SPECIAL REVENUE ESTIMATED FUNDS REVENUES: APPROPRIATIONS: Diseased Tree Removal $30,000 $30,000 E Brown Tax Increment Distr. $1,350,000 $1,384,100 Community Dev Block Grant $253,334 $253,334 ------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- TOTAL $1,633,334 $1,667,434 2. ENTERPRISE ESTIMATED FUNDS REVENUES: APPROPRIATIONS: Liquor Stores $2,715,300 $2,686,212 Centerbrook Golf Course $308,700 $289,182 Earle Brown Heritage Center $2,537,239 $2,537 Water Utility $1,321,531 $1,098,975 Sanitary Sewer $2,391,062 $1,950,488 Storm Drainage $801,365 $434,165 Recycling $217,866 $215,004 ------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- TOTAL $10,293,063 $9,211,265 Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk RESOLUTION NO. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. M h,3 proposuures&1VI Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A FINAL TAX LEVY FOR 1995 APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE GENERAL FUND, THE STREET IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND, THE E.D.A. FUND, AND THE H.R.A. FUND BUDGETS WHEREAS, The City of Brooklyn Center is annually required by Charter and state law to approve a resolution setting forth an annual tax levy to Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, Minnesota statutes require certification of a final tax levy to Hennepin County on or before December 28, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center as follows: 1. There is hereby levied upon all taxable property lying within the City of Brooklyn Center, a proposed tax levy of the following sums for the purpose indicated: GENERAL FUND $6,166,149 STREET IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE 72,116 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 140,592 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 122,340 $6,501,197 2. The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this resolution to be certified to Hennepin County so that said sum shall be spread upon the tax rolls and will be payable in the year 1995. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL TAX CAPACITY LEVY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COST OF OPERATION, PROVIDING INFORMATIONAL SERVICE, AND RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF MSA 469.001 THROUGH 469.047 OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FOR THE YEAR 1995 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center is the governing body of the City of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received a resolution from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center entitled a "Resolution Establishing the Final Tax Levy for the Brooklyn Center Housing and Redevelopment Authority; and WHEREAS, Minnesota statutes currently require certification of a final tax levy to the Hennepin County Auditor on or before December 28, 1994; and WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to the provisions of MSA 469.033, Subdivision 6, must by resolution consent to the final tax levy of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that a special tax be levied upon all real and personal property within the City of Brooklyn Center at the rate of 0.0144% of taxable market value of all taxable property, real and personal, situated within the corporate limits of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota and not exempted by the Constitution of the State of Minnesota or the valid laws of the State of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the said property tax levy be used for the operation of the Brooklyn Center housing and Redevelopment Authority pursuant to the provision of MSA 469.001 through 469.047. Date Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk RESOLUTION NO. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. iab Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1995 PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE GENERAL FUND, THE STREET IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND, THE E.D.A. FUND, THE H.R.A. FUND AND THE 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is annually required by Charter and state law to adopt an annual budget, and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is annually required by the Capital Improvements Fund Expenditure Policy to approve a five year capital improvements plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the appropriations for budgeted funds for the calendar year 1995 shall be: 1. ESTIMATED REVENUES: General Property Taxes $6,308,325 Sales Taxes on Lodging 395,000 Business Licenses & Permits 155,600 Non - Business Licenses & Permits 140,800 Intergovernmental Revenue 3,787,747 General Government Services Charges 32,500 Public Safety Service Charges 18,100 Recreation Fees 843,132 Fines & Forfeitures 112,000 Miscellaneous Revenue 286,000 Transfers from Other Funds 100,000 TOTAL REVENUE BY SOURCE $12,179,204 RESOLUTION NO. 2. APPROPRIATIONS: GENERAL FUND: Preliminary Unit No. Organizational Unit Amount 111 City Council $124,550 112 Commissions 9,500 113 City Manager's Office 351 114 Elections 37,162 115 Assessing 206,728 116 Finance 168,007 117 Audit 18, 400 118 Legal Counsel 204,700 119 Government Buildings 341,125 120 Data Processing 405,316 131 Police Protection 3,982,914 132 Fire Protection 512,242 133 Community Development 324,723 134 Emergency Preparedness 37,535 141 Engineering 364,762 142 Streets Maintenance 1,180,285 152 Social Services 40,860 160 Recreation Administration 231,927 161 Adult Programs 339,509 162 Teen Programs 15,483 163 Children's Programs 117,996 164 General Programs 95,066 167 Community Center 698,654 169 Parks Maintenance 830,747 170 Convention & Tourism 187,625 180 Unallocated Department 630,476 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $11,457,923 STREET IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND $72,116 E.D.A. SPECIAL OPERATING FUND $649,165 --------- - - - - -- TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR BUDGETED FUNDS $12,179,204 RESOLUTION NO. 3. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN: that the 1995 Five Year Capital Improvements Plan is approved as presented. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Meeting Date 12/19/94 31 City of f Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number �a � Request For Council Consideration Item Description: STAFF REPORT RE: SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE ASSESSMENT STABILIZATION PROGRAM Department Approval: A,-a Diane Spector, Direc o bf Public Services dQ 12 Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Select an Assessment Stabilization option. Staff recommends Option 1. Adopt by resolution the attached Special Assessment Policy. • Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached Yes ) The attached Special Assessment Policy is a compilation of policy which currently exists in several formats. The primary basis for the Policy is the Special Assessment Policy originally approved by the Village Council in 1964, last updated in that form in 1978. The attached Policy incorporates the details of the major policy change in 1985, which by resolution amended the Policy. The Policy also incorporates several other policies which hitherto have existed only in resolution or administrative policy form, such as the alley improvements policy, and the basis for calculating water and sanitary sewer hookups. It also incorporates the Assessment Stabilization Program. It is important to note that early in the Policy a statement is made to the effect that no policy statement can anticipate every contingency, and that it is expected that the Council might from time to time authorize a deviation from this Policy should it be in the public's interest. This Policy incorporates the recommended policy change regarding assessing storm sewer improvements. The Policy states that new storm sewer construction shall be assessed to benefitting property owners in the same proportion as typical street improvements. In other words, if 40 percent of a typical street improvement cost is assessed, 40 percent of the storm sewer cost would be assessed. Assessment Stabilization • The policy also in general terms reflects an amended the Assessment Stabilization Program to continue to assist the most vulnerable property owners, but to accelerate the transition from grant to special assessment. I have attached two options for the Council to consider. Both assume that those Request For Council Consideration Page 2 property owners with incomes less than 50 percent of the "Very Low Income" limit would pay no assessment. Those property owners with incomes equal to the Very Low Income limit would pay • 50 percent of the special assessment. The full assessment would be charged when the property owner's income exceeds the midpoint between Very Low and Low Income. The attached figure graphically shows those limits for a one - person household. Option 1 (see the attached figure) takes a strictly proportional approach. In other words, for each $1,000 increase in family income, the assessment would increase by a uniform amount. In Option 2, a progressive approach is used. In other words, those with a lesser income pay a lesser proportionate share of the assessment, and thus receive more "protection" than those of somewhat greater income. About $66,000 in grants were awarded in 1994. If either of the approaches would have been used in 1994, the total grants awarded would have been about $37,000. 13 of the 57 grantees would have been ineligible for the program, and 18 who were eligible for a full grant would have instead paid an assessment in the range of $21 - 693. I recommend the Council consider adopting Option 1. I believe it is fairer to all property owners to be treated equally, and from a strictly administrative view, this option would be easier to implement. There was very little difference overall between the two options because the grantees in 1994 tended to cluster between the Low Income and Very Low Income income limits. • Amount of Special Assessment to be Paid By Grant Recipient 1994 Assessment Stabilization Program, Family Size = 1 $1,600 I , E I I , C C /I 1 O C G V , , $1,40 C -- - 1 - -- -; - r - -_ r -- -,- - 1 - I 0 O , O 1 1 J 1 $1,200 - - I - - -, - r - - r -- - r - - -, - r - - - i -- - r - - r - - 1 - _ .., _..... -r - - ` r - - - T - /r ` .. -, - - r - - r I 4 "' , a I I I I I I O I $1,000 ---- 1 --- , -- T ..-- 1 - - - - - \ - 1 -- 1 --- 1 -- r -- l -- , -- T -- r -- I --- - - - T_ - rte - , - - r -- 1 --- { - - -- iii�� I 1 0 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 , O N I I I I I I (0) $800 -- -. -.. , , --- r " I_ - 7 - - - r _r . _ .. 1 ------ T !' " - ' - I' --- t r ----- 1 ,' -- - r O :�- T -- r ----- , - - T - - -I . Q 1 I , Q 1 I I I I I I I I I J I 1 I I y. �/ I C o ! I I I I I I I I I I I $600 I / I II I I/ I I I I T 1 I _ 'r Cu� nt ,/ I I $400 - / Optio - - - I I � � Option 2 $200 r- - - �_— I I I I I 1 , 1 I I , I I ' I , I I I� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . - (Y) L6 r- O') 1- M Lr r d I. M to r- d yr yr yr yr U> .- c- . - . - r- N N N N N yr ur yr trr ur to yr yr yr yr Family Income — +- - Current Program — -A — Option 1 O ption 2 III /C Member introduced the following resolution and • moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY WHEREAS, Section 429.051 of the Minnesota Statutes provides that the cost of any improvement or any part thereof may be assessed upon property benefitted by the improvement; and WHEREAS, the Village Council of the Village of Brooklyn Center first set forth in 1964 policies and procedures regarding the determination of benefits accruing from said improvements, to ensure that all properties were treated in a fair and equitable manner; and WHEREAS, the Special Assessment Policy has been amended from time to time by the Village Council and later the City Council, and additional, related policies set forth by separate resolution; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to incorporate all policies into a single document. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that the attached Special Assessment Policy is hereby approved and adopted. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: • and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 3 City of Brooklyn Center SPECIAL � ASSESSMENT POLICY December, 1994 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I. GENERAL POLICIES ........................... 2 A. Initiation of Public Improvement Projects ..................... 2 B. History ........... ............................... 2 C. Financing and Assessment Policies Applicable to all Types of Improvements ...... ............................... 2 SECTION II. SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ...................... 3 A. Standards for Surface Improvements ........................ 3 B. Assessment Formula for Surface Improvements ................ 4 1. Residential Streets .............................. 4 • 2. Municipal State Aid Streets ......................... 5 3. Alleys ...... ............................... 6 SECTION III. SUBSURFACE IMPROVEMENTS .................... 6 A. Standards ......... ............................... 7 B. Water Mains ...................................... 7 C. Sanitary Sewer ...... ............................... 8 D. Storm Drainage ..... ............................... 9 II ' SECTION IV. ASSESSMENT STABILIZATION PROGRAM ............ 10 A. Eligibility ......... ............................... 10 B. Calculation ........ ............................... 10 December 19, 1994 Page i SECTION L GENERAL POLICIES A. Initiation of Public Improvement Projects Public improvement projects may be initiated by petition of affected property owners. Public improvements may also be initiated by the City Council when, in its judgment, such action is required. The Capital Improvements Program shall detail a program of street improvements based on Pavement Management Program data, street and utility maintenance records, Municipal State Aid Standards, and the Local Storm Water Management Plan. B. History In 1964, the Village Council approved a Special Assessment Policy which detailed matters regarding the financing of public improvements as the community . developed. This Policy has been periodically amended, and related policies approved by separate resolution. In 1985, a substantial change in policy was approved by resolution, when the City abandoned residential assessments based on frontage to adopt a policy based on residence unit. This policy is intended to incorporate all policies related to improvement project financing. It is understood that this policy cannot anticipate every situation, and that certain circumstances may justify deviations from this policy. C. Financing and Assessment Policies Applicable to all Types of Improvements When an improvement is constructed which is of special benefit to properties within a definable area, it is the intent of the City Council that special assessments be levied against the benefitted properties within that area to the extent that the costs of such project can be deemed to benefit the properties. The following general principles shall be used as a basis of the City's assessment policy: 1. The "project cost" of an improvement shall be deemed to include the costs of all necessary construction work required to accomplish the improvement, plus engineering, legal, administrative, financing, and other contingent costs. i December 19, 1994 Page 1 City of Brooklyn Center Special Assessment Policy 2. The "assessable cost" of an improvement shall be defined as being those costs which, in the opinion of the City Council, are attributable to the need for service in the area served by the improvement. Said "assessable cost" shall be equal to the "project cost" of the current project, minus any credit attributed to remaining useful life expectancy or to that part of the improvement deemed to benefit the community as a whole. 3. Terms of special assessments shall be as follows: a. Street improvements - 10 years b. Bituminous alley improvements - 10 years Concrete alley improvements - 20 years C. Water and sanitary sewer hookups and improvements - 10 years d. Storm sewer improvements - 10 years Interest is charged at a rate established by the City Council at the time of certification of the levy. SECTION II. SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS • Surface improvements shall include grading and base construction, sidewalks, curb and gutter, surfacing, resurfacing, undergrounding overhead utilities, landscaping, beautification, and street lighting. A. Standards for Surface Improvements 1. Arterial streets —shall be of "9 ton" design, of adequate width to accommodate projected traffic volumes. Sidewalks shall be provided on both sides of all arterial streets unless specifically omitted by the City Council, and shall be of the width approved by the City Council. 2. Collector streets — (including commercial and industrial access streets) shall be of "7 ton" design, or "9 ton" design, based on anticipated usage, and shall normally be constructed in accordance with state aid standards. Sidewalks may be provided on one or both sides of all collector streets in accordance with the comprehensive plan and shall be at least 5 feet in width, unless otherwise approved by the Council. Wherever feasible, a boulevard at least 7 feet in width shall be provided, measured from the street face of curb to the street face of the sidewalk. December 19, 1994 Page 2 City of Brooklyn Center Special Assessment Policy 3. Residential streets —shall be of "5 ton" design, 30 feet in width, measured between faces of curbs or edge of street, unless otherwise approved by the Council. The Council may order the construction of sidewalks when such construction is warranted. 4. Alleys, in residential areas, shall be of "5 ton" design. Alleys shall be of bituminous construction unless drainage or other conditions require concrete. 5. Street lighting, when installed, shall be installed in accordance with the Council's policy on street lighting. Mid -block lights may be installed when the length of one block from the centerline of one intersecting street to the next intersecting street exceeds 700 feet, or when it is determined that a special public safety benefit would accrue. B. Assessment Formula for Surface Improvements The assessments to be levied against properties within the benefitted areas shall be distributed to those properties on the basis of the following provisions: 1. Residential Streets • a. For residential properties zoned Rl, the assessment to be applied against each non - subdividable property shall be a unit amount established annually by the City Council. Said assessment is intended to represent a specific proportion of the average cost of making a typical improvement, such as the average cost of reconstructing a typical block of residential street. For properties which may be legally subdividable into two or more lots, the assessment to be applied shall equal the maximum number of lots allowable times the unit assessment. The assessment shall be calculated as follows: 1. For reconstruction or resurfacing of a residential street, the average cost of a typical similar project shall be multiplied by the Council's designated proportion to be assessed. The total assessed shall be divided by the average number of lots to be assessed to determine the unit assessment. 2. Absent any other policy changes, such as an increase in the proportion of cost to be assessed, the unit assessment shall be adjusted annually to reflect cost of living increases as measured by the Construction Index. • December 19, 1994 Page 3 City of Brooklyn Center Special Assessment Policy • b. For residential properties zoned R2, the assessment shall be applied on a front foot basis, said unit being calculated as follows: The RI unit assessment shall be divided by 75 feet, to determine the front foot rate. The minimum assessment for an R2 property shall be the R1 unit assessment. C. For residential properties zoned R3, the assessment shall be applied per unit on the following basis. The R2 front foot rate shall be multiplied by the total feet of frontage to determine the total benefit. The total benefit shall be divided by the total number of units in the development to determine the unit rate. d. For R4 to R7 properties, commercial, industrial, institutional, or special use properties, the benefits and resulting assessments shall be determined on an individual project basis. e. For those properties zoned R1 or R2 having frontage on two or more streets, special assessments shall be levied for improvements on only one of those frontages, at the owner's choice. For example, a property on the corner of A street and B Avenue may choose to be assessed when A street is improved, or B Avenue, but not both. • 2. Municipal State Aid Streets a. For properties that are not commercial or industrial in project areas which are primarily residential in character: 1. Benefitting properties abutting a state aid designated street shall be assessed in the same manner as those abutting other residential streets. 2. In those cases where a municipal state aid street improvement project removes parking from a residential street where parking was previously allowed, no special assessments shall be levied. Where parking arrangements have been made, special assessments shall be levied. b. For properties which are commercial or industrial in project areas which are primarily residential in character, and for those properties in commercial areas: • December 19, 1994 Page 4 City of Brooklyn Center Special Assessment Policy 1. Commercial and industrial properties shall be assessed based on an area (acreage) basis. An "A" zone of benefit shall be determined on a project basis, but would typically include that area of all properties abutting the street to be improved, extending to a depth of 200 feet or the property depth, whichever is less. A "B" zone of lesser benefit may be established to identify those properties or portions of properties which do not abut the improved roadway, but which accrue benefit. 2. Unless otherwise approved by the City Council, benefitting properties within this category will be assessed for 70% of the total project cost. The Brooklyn Center State Aid Fund will be liable for the remaining 30% of the project costs. 3. If there is a combination of commercial, industrial and residential ro erties the commercial- industrial rate will be P P determined by calculating an equivalent footage rate based on assessing 70% of the total project cost, while the residential properties will be assessed in accordance with Subsection 2.a. of these policies. • 3. Alleys a. The cost of installation, resurfacing, or reconstruction shall be assessed on a unit basis. Forty percent of the cost to be assessed shall be assessed equally to all owners of lots abutting the alley. The remaining 60 percent shall be assessed equally to all owners of lots currently having access to the alley. b. The cost to be assessed shall include all project costs. For properties where a non -hard surfaced driveway exists, the cost of constructing an asphalt driveway between the paved portion of the alley and property line, minus the cost of sod restoration for an equivalent area, shall be individually computed and added to the uniform assessment for the specific property involved. SECTION III. SUBSURFACE IMPROVEMENTS Subsurface improvements shall include water distribution lines, sanitary sewer lines and storm sewer lines, ponds, or other drainage improvements. • December 19, 1994 Page 5 City of Brooklyn Center Special Assessment Policy A. Standards Subsurface improvements shall be made to serve current and projected land use. All installations shall conform to the minimum standards therefore as established by those state, local, or federal agencies having jurisdiction over the proposed installations. All installations shall also comply, to the maximum extent feasible, to such quasi - official, nationally recognized standards as those of the American Insurance Association (formerly National Board of Fire Underwriters). Service lines to the property line of each known or assumed building location shall be installed in conjunction with the construction of the mains. B. Water Mains All properties shall be assessed their share of the cost of installing water main to serve the property and the cost of installing the water service line between the water main and the property line. In addition, all properties shall be assessed their share of city -wide or area improvements such as distribution mains, wells, above ground storage, and elevated storage tanks. 1. For those improvement projects where existing main or appurtenances are repaired or replaced, including service replacement to the property line, no special assessments shall be charged. The full cost of said improvements shall be financed by the Water Utility Fund. 2. For those improvement projects where main or appurtenances are installed to provide new service to previously unserved properties, the full cost of said improvement shall be assessed, with the basis being the Engineer's determination of benefit to each newly served property. 3. All properties not previously assessed for water main, storage, and source improvements shall be charged at the appropriate rate as established by the most current "Water Hookup Fee Schedule ", unless the City Council by previous or current action has established a different rate. a. For those properties zoned R1 or R2, the hookup fee shall be charged on a unit basis. If the City had previously installed a water service to the property and the property had not been assessed, the rate shall be "residential unit with service." If the service had not been installed, the property shall be assessed the "residential unit without service" rate, and the property owners shall be responsible for the full cost of installing a service from the main to the building. December 19, 1994 Page 6 City of Brooklyn Center Special Assessment Policy b. For those properties not zoned Rl or R2, the hookup fee shall be charged on a combination front foot and area basis. The total lineal feet of frontage shall be charged at the front feet rate. This charge shall represent the hookup fee for that part of the property from the property line to a depth of 135' or the back property line, whichever is less. That part of the property outside the "front 135 feet" shall be charged a hookup fee based on area, at a rate per 100 square feet. Properties for which one or more services have been extended to the property line which had not previously been assessed for those services shall be charged the residential service rate per service. Properties without services shall be responsible for the full cost of installing service from the main to the building. C. Sanitary Sewer All properties shall be assessed their share of the cost of installing sanitary sewer laterals to serve the property and the cost of installing the sanitary sewer service line between the street and the property line. In addition, all properties shall be assessed their share of city -wide or area improvements such as interceptors and pumping stations. 1. For those improvement projects where existing lateral or appurtenances are repaired or replaced, including service replacement to the .property line, no special assessments shall be charged. The full cost of said improvements shall be financed by the Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund. 2. For those improvement projects where lateral or appurtenances are installed to provide new service to previously unserved properties, the full cost of said improvement shall be assessed, with the basis being the Engineer's determination of benefit to each newly served property. 3. All properties not previously assessed for sanitary sewer, interceptor, or pumping station improvements shall be charged at the appropriate rate as established by the most current "Sanitary Sewer Hookup Fee ", unless the City Council by previous or current action has established a different rate. a. For all properties, the hookup fee shall be charged on a front foot basis. If the City has previously installed a sanitary sewer service to the property and the property had not been assessed, the rate shall be "residential unit with service." If the service had not been installed, • December 19, 1994 Page 7 City of Brooklyn Center Special Assessment Policy the property shall be assessed the "residential unit without service" rate, and the property owners shall be responsible for the full cost of installing a service from the main to the building. D. Storm Drainage All properties shall be assessed their share of the cost of installing storm drainage facilities to serve the property. In addition, all properties shall be assessed their share of city -wide or area improvements such as interceptors and detention ponds. 1. For a project which includes construction of a storm sewer interceptor, detention pond, or other regional facility, an engineering study shall establish the distribution of benefit and determine the assessable portion of the project cost. The assessable cost of a storm sewer interceptor or detention and shall be P P assessed equally per unit of area (square foot, acre, etc.) over the entire district served by the interceptor or detention pond. The assessment is enerall levied in the current year of construction of the g Y Y interceptor storm sewer or detention pond, and it is entirely likely that a large number of properties will be assessed which do not receive immediate and total drainage relief. It is, however, considered that such properties do accrue benefit from the interceptor storm sewer since the interceptor is available to receive lateral storm sewer connections, or the detention pond or other regional facility may provide relief from storm events of greater magnitude than a 5 year storm. 2. For those improvement projects where existing lateral or appurtenances are repaired or replaced, or slightly upgraded, no special assessment shall be charged. The full cost of said improvements shall be financed by the Storm Drainage Utility Fund. 3. For those improvement projects where laterals or appurtenances are installed to provide new service to previously unserved properties, or where service is substantially upgraded, a portion of the cost of said improvement shall be assessed. Said portion shall be the same as the assessable portion of residential street improvement costs, as established in subsection B.1.a. December 19, 1994 Page 8 City of Brooklyn Center Special Assessment Policy SECTION IV. ASSESSMENT STABILIZATION PROGRAM There shall exist an Assessment Stabilization Program to assist low income property owners in the payment of special assessments. Said program shall provide grants to reduce or fully pay the assessment levied against homesteaded properties owned by persons whose households meet certain financial characteristics. A. Eligibility 1. Income limits shall conform to the annual limits established by HUD to guide the administration of housing programs. Specific administrative rules shall be developed and utilized to fairly and consistently evaluate the household's ability to pay. Properties must be zoned R1 or R2 or used as R1 or R2, and must be homesteaded. 2. Grants shall be made directly to the Special Assessment Fund, not to the individual property owner. Grants will reduce or fully pay the assessment certified to Hennepin County. Grants shall be made based on the financial circumstances at the time of certification, and will not be reevaluated in light of financial circumstances which change after the assessments are certified to Hennepin County. 3. Improvements which qualify for Assessment Stabilization participation include: - residential or State Aid street improvements in residential areas - storm sewer installation in residential areas B. Calculation 1. Property owners whose gross family income and size place them at 50 percent or less of the HUD "Very Low Income" limit shall receive a grant in the full amount of the assessment. 2. Property owners whose gross family income and size place them at the Very Low Income limit shall be eligible to receive a grant in the amount of 50 percent of the proposed unit assessment. 3. Property owners whose gross family income and size are greater than the amount midway between the Very Low Income and Low Income limits are not eligible to receive a grant. December 19, 1994 Page 9 Council Meeting Date 12/19/94 City of Br oo klyn Center Agenda Item Number /� d Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: STAFF REPORT RE: HENNEPIN COUNTY BROOKLYN BOULEVARD STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT, AND ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Department Approval: Diane Spector, Director o j�#lic Services Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Accept the proposal of BRW, Inc. to provide preliminary design services. Review the proposed terms of the agreement, estimated costs, and funding, and make any comments. • Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached Yes ) The purpose of this item is two -fold. First, the Council is requested to accept a proposal from BRW, Inc., to provide preliminary design services for the Hennepin County Brooklyn Boulevard improvement project. Second, I will briefly summarize the terms of the agreement negotiated with Hennepin County regarding the division of responsibilities and cost sharing regarding the project. And third, I will summarize our best estimate of the costs of the street project and the enhancement project, with our preliminary determination of the funding available. Proposal for Preliminary Design Services BRW, Inc., the firm which prepared both the concept plans for Brooklyn Boulevard and the enhancement plans, has submitted a proposal in the amount of $230,745.62. Hennepin County has agreed to pay 81 percent of the roadway - related portion of that fee, and 50 percent of the right of way related portion of that fee, or about $114,845. The remainder of the fee represents the City's portion of the roadway cost; work tasks relating to public utilities and drainage; the streetscape amenities project; and miscellaneous redevelopment issues. The attached tables summarize the estimated fees, and the funding sources. Because of BRW's high degree of involvement in the conceptual stage of the project, it is the recommendation of both Hennepin County staff and City staff that the council determine that it is in the best interests of the public to forego the usual RFP process and that BRW be retained for this project. The RFP process would require at least three months to process, and would probably result in proposals which are . higher than that submitted by BRW. The scope of services under this contract includes some very crucial issues. The following are the major work tasks: Request For Council Consideration Page 2 • Prepare and process environmental documents. An Environmental Assessment (EA) is required. The EA will require a number of special studies to be undertaken, a formal document to be prepared and • submitted to various agencies, and a public hearing to be conducted. • Prepare signal justification reports. An additional signal system would be installed at 68th Avenue as a part of this project, and revisions made to five other signal systems in the corridor. • Project basemapping. • Preliminary storm drainage analysis. • Redevelopment pond study. • Identify public and private utility impacts. • Prepare preliminary layout and define construction limits. This step is necessary to determine the exact right of way needed, and to define what would be a partial and what a total taking. • Streetscape amenities layout. • Redevelopment planning and coordination. • Right of way services. This includes preparation of an official map to guide interim development in the corridor, and platting services. • Miscellaneous special studies. • Public and agency involvement. • Project management. A resolution accepting BRW's proposal is provided for Council consideration. Cooperative Agreement With Hennepin County Staff have been working with Hennepin County for about the past year to negotiate a cooperative agreement. • This agreement would cover all aspects of the project, and would specify responsibilities at all stages and cost sharing. We are very close to an agreement, and are in the final stages of negotiation. The agreement is quite lengthy and technical; rather than attach a copy I have summarized key points below: • The City will take the lead on developing the preliminary plans for the roadway project. Hennepin County will participate in costs initially in the same proportion as the estimated construction cost split. The final distribution of costs shall be based on the actual construction cost split. The construction cost split shall be based on Hennepin County's Policy for Cost Participation. • The County will take the lead on developing the final plans and specifications and bidding and contracting for the improvement. County personnel will provide construction contract administration and construction services. Cost sharing for the final design shall be initially in the same proportion as the estimated cost split. The final distribution of costs, and the distribution of costs for construction management shall be based on the actual cost split. • In accordance with its policy, Hennepin County and the City will share 50150 the cost of right of way acquisition. In the case where a total taking is required, and the City desires to purchase the property for redevelopment purposes, the total purchase and relocation cost shall be proportioned between that area of the parcel which will become right of way, and that part which will be redeveloped. The 50150 split will be applied to the right of way portion, and the City will be responsible for the redevelopment portion. • The City will conduct acquisition and relocation proceedings, and will be responsible for any acquisition or relocation professional services costs. Hennepin County will pay 50 percent of the cost • of appraisals. Should acquisition proceed to condemnation, Hennepin County will be responsible for legal or other costs associated with the proceedings, with the City to pay 50 percent of the cost of condemnation commissioners. • The City will be entirely responsible for any public utility work required, and for the cost of undergrounding overhead utilities. Request For Council Consideration Page 3 I expect that a final version of the agreement will be brought to the Council for its approval within the next • few months. If the Council has any concerns about the agreement which might require additional negotiation with Hennepin County they should be brought to my attention as soon as possible. At this time, we still anticipate that the project will be constructed in 1997, although some Hennepin County staff would like to get it back on the 1996 schedule. It is unlikely that given the Environmental Assessment and right of way issues that we can meet the 1996 goal. Estimated Costs The attached tables are our best estimates of the overall project costs. There are still some unknowns. The power undergrounding estimate is still subject to negotiation with NSP. The City's participation in redevelopment is we hope a worst -case scenario, the resources which would be needed if the City must step in and acquire property to sell to a developer. (Obviously the City would recoup the cost of acquiring the property, but the full amount is shown to indicate the amount of capital which would be required.) We are hopeful that property owners and developers can work with the City to come to private agreements without need of City participation. Obviously right of way costs are always difficult to estimate. Complicating this project is the fact that several of the properties more than likely have some type of underground contamination. The extent of the contamination and the required abatement is unknown at this time. We will have a better idea of these costs as we get farther into the project. Regarding financing, at the bottom of the table labelled "Possible Funding Sources," I have shown the • possible funding scenario for the City's $4.174 million share of the project. The City may use some of its regular state aid funds for improvements to county state aid highways; that use is limited to the types of improvements which would be eligible for funding were it a municipal state aid improvement. In other words, we can fund the cost of curb and gutter, signal improvements, engineering costs, etc., from regular state aid, but not the cost of undergrounding power, enhancements, trails, etc. I have shown an estimated $700,000 in special assessments, a combination of assessments for street improvements and assessments for enhancements and beautification. Additional study will be required to determine the amount of benefit to the adjacent properties, and what level of special assessments would be supported, both by the Council and the property owners. Finally, the Local State Aid fund could take a substantial hit from this project. If the City and the TIF district do not need to get as financially involved as the worst -case scenario estimates, then the TIF district could contribute more toward the cost of the enhancements, and thus reduce the impact on the Local State Aid fund. • INTRODUCTION Brooklyn Boulevard plays an important role in the City of Brooklyn Center's public image and is a vital link in the City's transportation system. Because of Brooklyn Boulevard's important " role in the City, the City of Brooklyn Center has been developing a comprehensive plan for Brooklyn Boulevard (within the City limits) that includes streetscape improvements, roadway improvements and guidelines for future redevelopment. The reconstruction of Brooklyn Boulevard from 65th Avenue to Wingard Place will represent the first phase of this larger improvement on Brooklyn Boulevard. With the reconstruction of this section of Brooklyn Boulevard, there is an opportunity to implement many of the elements included in the plan and set the image and standard for the rest of the corridor. Because the reconstruction of this section of Brooklyn Boulevard requires total acquisition of a number of properties, it can serve as a catalyst for redevelopment. This creates opportunities for improving access and circulation on Brooklyn Boulevard as well as opportunities for improving the image of the corridor. 31 The preliminary design for this phase of the project needs to address the design of the roadway '� as well as the design of the streetscape elements. The project also needs to be coordinated with potential redevelopment in the corridor. The design process will require a partnership among 1 the City, County and abutting property owners to be successful. a e Because of the need for close coordination of the roadway design with the streetscape design and potential redevelopment, the City of Brooklyn Center will take the lead on the preliminary 13 design phase of the project. Hennepin County will lead the final design for the project. Because both federal and state aid funds are involved in the project, the project must also obtain 9 Mn /DOT State Aid and FHWA approvals. 3 This proposal addresses the work tasks that are required to complete the preliminary design for Phase I of the Brooklyn Boulevard improvements. At the completion of the preliminary design 2 the City will have the following: • Federal and State Environmental Clearance A Preliminary Roadway Layout Showing the limits of Construction • A Streetscape Plan Showing Location of Streetscape Elements (i.e., lights, landscaping, special features) • A Drainage Plan For the Corridor Preliminary Locations for Public and Private Utilities • An Approved Right -of -way Plan Which the City Can Use to Begin Right -of -way Negotiations /Acquisition The Study Report will be prepared as part of final design. In addition, the final design will address construction staging, traffic .control, signing and the final location of storm drains, and public and private utilities. Any additional temporary easements needed for the project will also be determined in final design. BRW, Inc. Brooklyn Boulevard Pluise 1 Preliminary Design I'I x14079 1 TABLE 1 COST ESTIMAT*vised 11/11/94) BROOKLYN BOUL[ VARU PHASE I PRELIMINARY DESIGN - __ - � ROAnWAY PROJECT C OSTS _ R1GfIT OF -WAV CASTS _ REDE VELOPMENT PROJECT COST TASK TASK NAME -- -- - - - -- - -� A$SOC�C STAFF TASK I - ASSO 231 §. ST 1_4.00 AMOUNT AS C£ N 00 ST 14.00�A - MOUNT NO, $3 300 5 23 M _- $14 00 AMOUNT $33 00 X23 .00_ _ 1.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PREPARATION 1.1 Traffic Counts 2 120 1.2 Traffic Forecasts 2 24 1.3 Traffic Operations Analysis 2 24 1.4 Traffic Circulation/Access 4 1.5 SIIPO Letter 4 1.6 Right -of -way Impacts 2 40 1.7 Social Impacts 4 1.8 Air Quality Impacts 4 32 1.9 Noise Impacts 4 32 1.10 hazardous Wastes 2 16 1.11 Water Quality 4 1.12 Other Impacts 4 1.13 Permits 4 1.14 Construction Impacts 8 1.15 Document Preparation 8 64 72 1.16 Distribution and Notification 2 4 2 1.17 lJ plate /FONSI__ _ ------- - - - - - _ - --- - -_ --_ 8 32 24 ___532,041 62 $0.0 $0 _00 10 SIGNALJUSTIFICATIONREPORT 2.1 Document Existing Volumes 2 12 2.1 Compare with Warrants 18 24 2.3 _ Prepare Repor 2 40 _-- ____ -- $5.966.17 -, $0.00 $0.00 3.0 DESIGN BASE MAP 3.1_ BasemapModifications _ - 8 2 0 80_55,294.33 - $0. 00 $0.00 Al.0 STORMDRAINAGEANALYSIS 4.1 Compile As- Builts On Base 9 40 24 4.2 Runoff and Pond Calculations 20 76 16 43 Cost Estimate 4 8 4 4.4 Rclwrt 2 8 0 4.5 Project/Agency Meetings 16 0 $15,99497 _ .S0.0o 5010 4.OA REDEVELOPMENT POND STUDY 4.IA Compile Asbuilts on Base 6 20 16 4.2A Runoff and Pond Calculations (2 Alt.) 10 60 32 4.3A Ptepure Rclwrt 2 12 0 4AA Meet with Watershed 8 8 0 4.5A _ Cost Estimate (2 Alt.)_ -_ -_ -- -_ -- _ - 00 $0 .00 4 8 0 $11,9 4.06 PARK AND RIDE POND STUDY (If Needed) 4.111 Gather Plans and Calculations 8 8 0 4.28 Study For_Ineorporation of Brooklyn Boulevard _ - _16 40 _ 20 - $6,247.54 $0.00 $0.00 -- - - 5.0 PUBLIC/PRIVATE UTILITY IMPACT'S 5.1 Asbuilts Compiled on Base 12 32 24 5.2 Verify Information 8 20 8 5.3 Determine Impacts 11 24 18 5.4 Cost Estimate 4 8 4 5.5 Report $0 .(X) $0.00 2 8 0 $11,751.46 6.0 PRELIMINARY LAYOUT /CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 6.1 Typical Sections 2 12 4 6.2 Alignment 2 16 16 6.3 Layout of lanes, Medians, Sidewalks 4 8 12 6.4 Truck Turning Radii/intersection Layout 4 16 8 6.5 Taper Designations 2 4 6.6 Minimum Sight Comers 16 4 6.7 Entrance felocations/closures 4 24 8 6.8 Profiles 8 24 24 6.9 Construction Limits 12 56 100 6.10 ROW Limits/Access Control 4 4 8 6.11 Clarification Notes 2 8 4 6.12 Cost Estimate 4 8 20 6.13 Environnuntally Sensitive Areas 0 2 2 $25,903.18 $0.00 $0.00 ZO STREETSCAPE AMEN ITUS LAYOUT 7.1 Project Area Definition 16 32 24 7.2 Selection of Streetscape Elements 60 120 60 7.3 Preliminary Plan 16 20 160 7.4 Cost Estimate 50.00 $0.00 24 $32,156.46 TABLE 1 COST ESTIMAT& 11/11/94 Cont.) BROOKLYN BOULEVARD PHASEIPRELIMIN _ -_ - - - -- __- _____ _ _ RQADWAY PROJECT C - _ RI COST RED EV ELOP MENT PROJECT COSTS _ 9.0 REDEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND COORDINATION 1/ _ _ $0.00 $0.00 80 80 40 $ 14,470.41 9.0 RI-OF -WAY SERVICES 9.1 Official Map 16 24 48 9.2 Subdiv Plat $ 0 .0 0_ 24 40 196 $17,823. $0.00 10.0 h1_ 1SCELLANEOUS SPECIAL STUDIES 32 1 00_ 7 $12,529.53 $0.00 $0.00_ 11.0 PUBLIC /AGENCY INVOLVEMENT 11.1 City Staff Meetings (12) 12 24 12 12 24 12 11.2 County Staff Meetings (6) 12 24 12 11.3 MnDOT Staff (3) 6 12 6 11.4 Project'rask Force (3) 4 6 3 8 12 6 11.5 Affected Property Owners (3) 4 6 3 8 12 6 11.6 City Council (1) 6 6 2 11.7 Public Hearing (1) 16 16 8 $13,741.14 $0.00 $6,787.31 110 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 12.1 Progress Reports 18 0 0 6 0 0 12.2 Work Orders 3 6 0 1 2 0 12.3 Project Team Coordination 30 0 0 10 0 0 12.4 Monitor Budget 9 0 0 3 0 0 12.5 Scope Refinement 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.6 Design Review Minutes 18 36 9 _$10,525.50 $0.00 6 12 3 $3,508.50 TOTAL HOURS _ _ 337 1016 _ 727 _ _40 64 _244 3 17 _ 514 4 13 TOTAL LABOR COSTS $11,121.00 $23,368.00 $10,178.00 $44,667.00 $1,320.00 $1,472.00 $3,416.00 $6,208.00 $10,461.00 $11,822.00 $5,782.00 $28,065.00 OVERHEAD (@1.5521) _ _ $69,327.65 $9,635.44 $4 TOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $113,994.65 $15,843.44 $71,624.69 FEE O 12.5 % $14,249.33 __$1,980.43 $8,953.09 TOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD + FEE $128,243.98 $17,823.87 $80,577.77 DIRECT EXPENSES Environmental Testing Mileage, Parking $900.00 $150.00 $300.00 Copies, Camera Work, Blueprints $1,800.00 _ $350.00 _ _ _$600.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $130 $18 323.87 $81,477.77 l/ Hours Included for this task are not based on a specific work scope. They have been Included as a budget to cover redevelopment Issues. BRW would only bill for the actual work performed. 21 Costs for Environmental Testing are not included in the Preliminary Design Estimate. It is assumed that the Environmental Testing of buildings and soils on total takes will be covered as part of the right -of -way acquisition process. The Environmental Testing required for the roadway is assumed to be part of Final Design SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR BROOKLYN BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS Project Cost Item E ti J s m.Total Cost City County Mn/DOT Cost Split* Share Share Share 1. Preliminary Design 230 745 115 90 y g $ $ 0 $114,845 $0 Roadway $130,950 A $25,270 $105,680 $0 Public Utilities $23,655 D $23,655 $0 $0 Right of Way $18,330 B $9,165 $9,165 $0 Enhancements $39,710 D $39,710 $0 $0 Redevelopment $18,100 D $18,100 $0 $0 2. Final Design $350,000 $67,550 $282,450 $0 Roadway A $0 $0 $0 Construction Management A $0 $0 $0 3. Basic Roadway Construction a. Brooklyn Boulevard $2,746,860 A $529,835 $2,217,025 $0 b. I -694 Ramps $301,660 C $0 $0 $301,660 less ISTEA /STP Funds $1,600,000 $278,081 $1,163,594 $158,325 ROADWAYNET COST $1,448,520 $251,754 $1,053,431 $143,335 4. ROW Acquisition $2,700,000 $2,200,000 $500,000 $0 Roadway $1,100,000 B $600,000 $500,000 $0 Redevelopment $1,600,000 D $1,600,000 $0 $0 5. Beautification Underground Power $800,000 D $800,000 $0 $0 Enhancements $1,000,000 D $1,000,000 $0 $0 less ISTEA Funds $500,000 D $500,000 $0 $0 BEA UTIFICA TION NET COST $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $8,129,265 $4,713,285 $3,114,320 $301,660 less ISTEA /STP fnds $2,100,000 $778,081 $1,163,594 $158,325 TOTAL COST, NET ISTEA $6,029,265 $3,935,204 $1,950,726 $143,335 Total Roadway $3,071,455 5977,394 $1,950,726 5143,335 Total Beautification/Redevelopment 82,957,810 82,957,810 $0 $0 "A is based on application of Hennepin County Policy for Cost Participation, as applied in BRW's Estimate of Construction Contract Costs (see Exhibit Q. Calculated as : City share = $529,835 / $2,746,860 = 19.3% County share = $2,217,025 / $2,746,860 = 80.7% This split is to be applied to preliminary design costs and final design costs for roadway improvements contemplated under HC's ISTEA/STP grant B is based on application of Hennepin County Policy for Cost Participation for ROW costs (50150). C indicates no participation by either the City or the County. D indicates City cost, with no participation by the County. I� POSSIBLE FUNDING SOURCES CITY'S SHARE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR BROOKLYN BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS 12/15/94 Preliminary Design $115,900 Regular State Aid $25,270 Local State Aid $9,165 SDU $11,904 PU $11,751 TIF $57,810 Final Design $67,550 Regular State Aid $39,990 Local State Aid SDU $17,560 PU $10,000 Road Improvements $529,835 Regular State Aid $108,765 Local State Aid ($78,695) Special Assessments $150,000 SDU $71,685 PU ISTEA $278,080 Right of Way Regular State Aid $300,000 Local State Aid $300,000 Total Roadway Improvements $1,313,285 Regular State Aid $474,025 Local State Aid $230,470 Storm Drainage Utility $101,149 Water /Sewer Utilities $21,751 Special Assessments $150,000 ISTEA $278,080 TIF $57,810 Underground Power $800,000 Local State Aid $400,000 Special Assessments $200,000 TIF $200,000 Enhancements $1,000,000 ISTEA $500,000 Special Assessments $350,000 TIF $150,000 Local State Aid Redevelopment TIF $1,600,000 TOTAL $4,713,285 Regular State Aid $474,025 Local State Aid $630,470 Storm Drainage Utility $101,149 Water /Sewer Utilities $21,751 Special Assessments $700,000 ISTEA $778,080 TIF $2,007,810 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGN, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1994 -14, BROOKLYN BOULEVARD STREET IMPROVEMENT, 65TH AVENUE TO 71ST AVENUE WHEREAS it is necessary o contract with a consulting en ineer to provide preliminary rY g P P Y design services for Improvement Project No. 1994 -14 Brooklyn Boulevard Street Improvement, to g P J � Y 71st Avenues; and WHEREAS, City staff and Hennepin County staff believe it is in the public's best interest to retain the firm of BRW, Inc. to provide services relating to preparation of an environmental assessment, right of way determination, preliminary design, platting, and base mapping; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Services has obtained a proposal from BRW, Inc. to provide the professional services as related to this project, at an estimated cost of $230,745; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has agreed to participate in the cost of said contract, in an amount estimated to be $114,645. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The proposal for services submitted by BRW, Inc. is hereby accepted and approved. 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract with BRW b on the basis of their proposal. 3. The cost of said agreement shall be funded as follows: Regular State Aid (Account #2613) $25,270 Local State Aid (Account #2911) 66,975 Storm Drainage Utility 11,904 Water Utility 5,875 Sanitary Sewer Utility 5,876 Hennepin County 114.845 TOTAL $230,745 Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Meeting Date December 19, 1994 _ 31 City of f Brooldyn Center Agenda Item Number �a� Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: COPS F.A.S.T. FEDERAL GRANT PROPOSAL Department Approval: Scott Kline, Acting Chief of Poli ce Manager's Review/Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Council not apply for Federal Grant at this time. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached no . After some careful research and a thorough discussion of the COPS F.A.S.T. Federal Grant Program, it has been unanimously agreed by the staff that the department should not, at this time, apply for grant monies to expand the police department. The first and most important factor that we considered was the grant funding. At this time, the enabling legislation for this program has been passed and is law, but as of this date, the funding legislation has only been passed for the upcoming year, 1995; and the funding level has only been set for the 1995 calendar year. The enabling legislation does state this is going to be a sliding funding program with 75% being the maximum in the first year and that subsequent years would be at a lesser level. Without any kind of funding legislation to tell us what the funding levels will be for the future, it would be impossible for the department to budget accurately in the subsequent years; and the uncertainty could lead to the department suddenly having to totally fund the project because of fiscal problems at the federal level. The alternative would be to down size back to a level of staffing prior to the federally funded officers being brought on board. Since we believe this is a bad way to operate the department, we believe it is best to error on the side of conservative fiscal responsibility. The second reason that the staff believes, at this time, it would not be a good idea was the fact we will be hiring five new officers and simultaneously putting them through our extensive training program to prepare them to work on the street by themselves. Five officers at once will strain our ability to properly train new officers. It is believed that if any additional officers were added to this training regimen, it could create severe future liabilities for the department in the area of adequate training which is a very critical and potentially a costly liability issue for the city. Indications from Washin on from the last few days have also led us to believe that the first year funding for the � Y Y • COPS F.A.S.T. Program is now not a certainty which would definitely be an excellent reason to not apply. Council Meeting Date 12/19/94 3 C4 o f Brooklyn Center Agenda Ium Number 1� � ^i Request For Council Consideration Item Description: RESOLUTION SETTING WAGES AND SALARIES FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1995 AND 1995 -1996 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT FOR LOCAL NO. 49 Department Approva e G. Spl' t r, City Manager Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: We recommend the City Council's favorable consideration of the attached resolution approving the 1995 compensation plan and a motion to authorize acceptance and signature of the proposed contract settlement for 1995 -1996 for Local No. 49 public works bargaining unit. • Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached Yes ) Attached are copies of the 1995 proposed compensation plan for the City of Brooklyn Center. We are recommending a general salary increase of three percent and an additional $15 per month in employer health insurance contribution. In our review of salary increases, adopted or recommended for City Council consideration, in suburban communities similar to Brooklyn Center, the pattern appears to be in the range of three percent on salary increases not only for 1995 but also for agreements proposed to be settled for 1996. We have reached an agreement with the public works International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 49 with regard to the 1995 -1996 contract. For public works Local No. 49 contract, all items were open for negotiations. Our agreement calls for a three percent salary increase in the base wage for 1995 and a three percent increase in the base wage for 1996. An additional $15 per employee per month employer contribution on insurance from $320 in 1994 to $335 in 1995. Also a $15 increase per month employer contribution for 1996 for a total of $350 per month. Our Local No. 49 bargaining unit will vote on this proposed settlement before the Council meeting on Monday evening. We will report the results of their consideration at the Council meeting. Currently, we have not come to an agreement with the police bargaining unit. The full contract is up for negotiation. We have made an offer for one year similar to the Local No. 49 agreement. We continue negotiating with LELS No. 82 at the current time. Also attached for your information is a memo from Assistant City Manager Nancy Gohman regarding details on the Local No. 49 contract changes for 1995 and 1996, and details in the 1995 compensation plan. Adoption of these recommendations will keep Brooklyn Center salaries and benefits in line with the suburban employment market. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION SETTING WAGES AND SALARIES FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1995 AND 1995 -1996 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT FOR LOCAL NO. 49 WHEREAS, Section 2.07 of the City Charter for the City of Brooklyn Center states that the City Council is to fix the salary or wages of all officers and employees of the City; and WHEREAS, the 1984 Minnesota Pay Equity Act requires every political subdivision to establish "equitable compensation relationships" between its employees; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the 1995 Employee Position and Classification Plan; and WHEREAS, the 1995 Employee Position and Classification Plan establishes that pay increases will be awarded on a pay- for - performance basis; and • WHEREAS, the structure of the 1995 Employee Position and Classification Plan provides for pay increases awarded for improvements in job performances; and WHEREAS, an individual employee's movement through their respective pay schedule reflects a progression in corresponding levels or improved job performance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center hereby sets wages and salaries for the calendar year 1995 by adoption of the attached Position and Classification Plan for the calendar year 1995 which sets ranges and maximums which the City Manager shall be authorized to pay in classified positions; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City manager may move an individual employee to pay grades in the attached Position and Classification Plan but is limited to authorizing increases to due to Pay Equity Act compliance by the Annual Budget constraints adopted by the City Council; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the 1995 City Employee Position and Classification Plan is approved and adopted because it is generally an equitable pay plan for City employees; however, parts of the Plan were approved and adopted solely for the purpose of compliance with the mandate of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 471.999; that adoption of said Plan shall create no vested rights, terms or conditions of employment or entitlement to any given level of compensation for any employee or group of employees; that said Plan shall be subject to • continuing review and reconsideration and may be amended from time -to -time by the City Council; and • RESOLUTION NO. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager be authorized to employ such part-time and temporary full- and part-time employees as may be necessary, and to establish competitive rates of pay for such help consistent with the 1995 budget appropriations; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager be authorized to make interim appointments to fill vacant positions whenever a position is vacant because the regular employee is on leave of absence, vacation leave, sick leave, or is absent for any other reason, and to establish rates of pay for such appointments consistent with the 1995 budget appropriations; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that authorized wage adjustments, not to exceed the maximums contained herein, shall become effective January 1, 1995. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • City of Brooklyn Center Memorandum To: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager c � ' j F ROM: Nancy Gohman, Assistant City Manager t�': DATE December 16, 1994 SUBJECT: 1995 Compensation and Insurance Recommendation (Local 49 1995 and 1996 Contract) As you are aware, we are currently in negotiations with both police and Local No. 49 public works bargaining units for contracts for 1995 and possibly 1996. With regards to Local No. 49, it appears we have a two -year settlement if the Council approves the agreement. As for police, we continue to negotiate at the bargaining table with no settlement at the current time. The 1995 Pay Plan is attached. Recommendations are as follows: Local No. 49 (Maintenance A. Wages 1995 and 1996: As a result of contract negotiations, we have offered a wage increase of three percent across the board for all base wage rates of the Local No. 49 contract for 1995 and also three percent for base wage rates in 1996. A number of cities have approved two -year settlements for organized employees consistent with increases listed above. B. Insurance 1995: In the area of health insurance, we have negotiated and are asking the City Council to approve an increase of $15 for 1995, not to exceed $335 per month per employee, towards the cost of coverage under the Brooklyn Center group hospital /medical insurance plans and group dental insurance as fringe benefit compensation for full -time employees and eligible dependents ($320 in 1994), effective January 1, 1995. No changes in dental insurance or life insurance. C. Insurance 1996: Effective January 1, 1996, the City will contribute an additional $15 towards health insurance premiums in an amount not to exceed $350 per month per employee towards the cost of coverage under the Brooklyn Center group hospital /medical insurance plans and group dental insurance as fringe benefit compensation for full -time employees and eligible dependents. D. Other: We have also agreed to extend probation from six months to one year for all new hires and have updated the Working Out Of Classification Pay in the contract. • 1995 Pay Plan - Regular Full -Time Employees Also attached for your review is the 1995 Pay Plan. Incorporated in this pay plan is a salary increase of three percent for all rates in the compensation schedule. This increase is consistent with other settlements in the metro area, along with the proposed settlement for Local 49. As in the past, Brooklyn Center has worked to maintain, as much as possible, equal settlements Gerald G. linter S _ P December 16, 1994 Page 2 between different employee groups. Therefore, a three percent increase on the compensation schedule is recommended. Compensation Plan Detail on Changes There are also some additional specific changes to the compensation schedule. These changes are detailed below: A. Move nondepartment -head positions into comparable steps and pay within the FLSA Exempt Employees Classification Plan. These positions include: 1. Director of Recreation to pay grade C34 2. City Assessor to pay grade C33 3. Liquor Stores' Manager to pay grade C29 This movement simply takes these positions which are nondepartment heads and moves them out of the department head schedule and into the salary schedule with other nondepartment -head, supervisory positions for professionals. This change is consistent with past restructuring which has been approved by Council. B. Reclassify the following positions based on an increase in job responsibilities: 1. Engineer from pay grade C34 to C35 2. EBHC Innkeeper from pay grade C11 to C18 (This would put the innkeeper in a comparable pay group with the sales director for EBHC.) 3. EBHC Receptionist /Secretary from pay grade D8 to D13 (This makes the receptionist /secretary equal and comparable to the current EBHC secretarial position.) C. Add /modify the following positions: 1. EBHC Salesperson: Currently, there are two full -time salesperson positions. Through the budget process, it is recommended to add one additional full -time salesperson to have three full -time positions in pay grade of C12. 2. Police Officer: We are currently approved for 32 police officers. Through the budget process, it has been recommended we add two positions: one being the police officer assigned as school liaison which is currently in place, and secondly, a full -time police officer position to equal 34 full -time officers. 3. Change hours and title of the part-time administration clerk position to full -time administration /community development secretary to pay grade D13. 4. Add one full -time code enforcement officer. We currently have one full -time officer; adding an additional full -time position would equal two full -time code enforcement officers at pay grade D14. Gerald G. Splinter December 16, 1994 Page 3 5. EBHC Assistant Innkeeper: This is currently a part-time position which would change to full -time in 1995 at pay grade D8. 6. Add one part -time clerk/typist at EBHC in the part-time pay schedule at pay grade N5. Insurance - Schedule G Increase insurance ($15) effective January 1, 1995, to $335 per month per employee towards the cost of coverage for dependent coverage ($320 in 1994). Language to be as follows: "The City will contribute effective with insurance premiums due January 1, 1995, payment of the amount not to exceed $335 per month per employee towards the cost of coverage under Brooklyn Center group hospital /medical insurance plans and group dental insurance as fringe benefit compensation for full -time employees and eligible dependents. Dental insurance not to exceed $30 per month. In addition, the City will provide a $10,000 group term life insurance policy. " The City /Employee contribution for dependent health insurance for 1995 is approximately 70 -75 percent paid by the City and 30 -25 percent paid by employee depending on plan selected. 1995 City Manager Compensation Agreement - Schedule H • Increase salary three percent, consistent with nonorganized compensation schedule . (1994 salary equals $82,718; 1995 three percent increase equals $85,200). 1995 Personal Expense Reimbursement Policy - Schedule I • Modify Section "G" for clarification allowing a maximum of $31 per day allowable for meals when employee is on authorized travel. (No change in dollar amount; clarifies language to allow a total amount of $31 per day.) As always, if you have questions regarding this, please ask me. Attachments City of f Brooklyn Center 1995 Pa y Plan Full -Time Employees City of Brooklyn Center 1995 Employee Position and Classification Plan Table of Contents Contents Schedule Page Positions Authorized A 1 Department Head /City Manager Pay Plan B 4 FLSA Exempt Pay Plan C 5 FLSA Nonexempt Pay Plan D 7 LELS No. 82 (Police Officers) Pay Plan E 9 Local Number 49 (Maintenance) Pay Plan F 10 Employee Insurance Benefits G 11 City Manager Compensation Agreement H 12 Personnel Expense Reimbursement Policy I 17 Employee Training Policy 1 19 Retirement -Paid Health Insurance Program K 20 Severance Benefits for Laid -Off Employees Program L 22 1995 Employee Position and Classification Plan Schedule A Regular Full -Time and Salaried Part -Time Positions Authorized Exempt Organ�zatton I Unit tions Posi From Salary _. Positi on ; Authorized Organized Overtime Schedule CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE City Manager 1 No Yes -Exec B Assistant City Manager /Personnel Coord 1 No Yes -Adm C Administrative Assistant /Deputy City Clerk 1 No Yes -Adm C Administrative Secretary/Deputy City Clerk 1 No No D Admin /Comm Development Secretary 1 No No D Administration /Elections Secretary 1 No No D Switchboard Operator /Receptionist 1 No No D COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Director of Community Development 1 No Yes -Exec B Planning and Zoning Specialist 1 No Yes -Prof C Community Development Specialist 1 No Yes -Adm C Inspector/Building Official 1 No Yes -Adm C Inspector 1 No No D Housing Inspector 1 No No D Community Development Recept /Sec 1 No No D Assessing Division Assessor 1 No Yes -Exec C Appraiser II 1 No No D Assessment Technician 1 No No D Assessing Secretary 1 No No D Earle Brown Heritage Center EBHC Manager 1 No Yes -Exec C EBHC Maintenance Supervisor 1 No Yes -Exec C EBHC Sales Director 1 No Yes -Exec C EBHC Salesperson 3 No Yes -Adm C EBHC Innkeeper 1 No Yes -Exec C EBHC Maintenance Custodian 1 No No D EBHC Secretary 2 No No D EBHC Assistant Innkeeper 1 No No D FINANCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Director of Finance 1 No Yes -Exec B Assistant Director of Finance 1 No Yes -Adm C Staff Accountant 1 No Yes -Prof C Payroll /Personnel Technician 1 No No D S Utilities Technician 1 No No D Accounting Technician 1 No No D Finance Secretary 1 No No D Data Entry Operator 1 No No D -1- 1995 Positions Authorized Schedule A Exempt • Organizational Unit Positions From Salary Position Authorized' Organized ! Overtime. Schedule; FINANCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT (Continued) Data Processing Division Management Information Systems Coord 1 No Yes -Prof C Liquor Stores Division Liquor Stores' Manager 1 No Yes -Exec C Retail Supervisor 2 No Yes -Exec C FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Chief /Emergency Management 1 No Yes -Exec B Coordinator POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief of Police 1 No Yes -Exec B Police Captain 2 No Yes -Adm C Police Sergeant 7 L #82 No E Police Officer 34 L #82 No E Administrative Analyst 1 No Yes -Adm C Staff Services Supervisor 1 No Yes -Adm C Code Enforcement Officer 2 No No D Property Room Supervisor 1 No No D Public Safety Dispatcher 6 No No D Police Secretary 2 No No D Police Classification Operator 1 No No D Police Receptionist 1 No No D PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT Director of Public Services 1 No Yes -Exec B City Engineer 1 No Yes -Prof C Public Services Coordinator 1 No Yes -Adm C Engineering Technician IV 1 No No D Engineering Technician III 3 No No D Public Services Administrative Aide 1 No No D Engineering Secretary 1 No No D Government Buildings Division Maintenance Supervisor 1 No Yes -Exec C Maintenance Custodian 1 No No D Lead Custodian 1 No No D Custodian 1 No No D -2- 1995 Positions Authorized Schedule A Exempt Organizational Unit Positions From Salary Position Authorized Organized Overtime Schedule PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT (Continued) Recreation Division Director of Recreation 1 No Yes -Exec C Program Supervisor 3 No Yes -Adm C Aquatics Supervisor 1 No Yes -Adm C Golf Course Grounds Supervisor 1 No Yes -Adm C Recreation Secretary 1 No No D Streets and Parks Division Public Works Superintendent 1 No Yes -Exec C Supervisor of Streets and Parks Maintenance 1 No No D Maintenance II 17 L #49 No G Central Garage Division Mechanic 3 L #49 No G Night Service Person 1 L #49 No G Public Services MIS Technician 1 No No D Public Services Clerical Technician 1 No No D Public Utilities Division Supervisor of Public Utilities 1 No No D Maintenance II 6 L #49 No G Total Regular Full -Time Positions' Authorized: 153 -3- Schedule B City of Brooklyn Center • Department Head and City Manager P Y g 1995 Employee Position and Classification Plan (FLSA Exempt Positions) Position Title Minimum Annual Maximum Annual City Manager $73,499 $90,771 Director of Public Services 60,227 74,380 Director of Finance /City Treasurer 56,000 69,160 Chief of Police 54,548 67,366 Director of Community Development 51,150 63,170 Fire Chief 47,5451 58,718 Ranges: The lower end of the range should normally include relatively inexperienced employees, as well as those whose performance remains below fully satisfactory levels. The top of the range should include the normally experienced, fully satisfactory employees and represent the established "going rates". Salary - Setting Authority: The City Manager is authorized to set salaries within the established ranges. Upon the recommendation of the City Manager, the City Council may approve individual salary adjustments above the maximum for those employees who have demonstrated superior performance over a significant period on the job or at comparable levels of responsibility or for employees whose salaries were approved above the maximum of the range when hired. • -4- City of Brooklyn Center SAHEE ULE C FLSA Exempt Employees 1995 Employee Position and Classification Plan Positions Exempt from Overtime ........................ .... .. .. ............ ..... . .. ...... ..... C35 City Engineer $4,316 $4,532 $4,759 $4,878 $5,000 $5,125 $5,253 C34 Director of Recreation $4,211 $4,422 $4,643 $4,759 $4,878 $5,000 $5,125 C33 City Assessor $4,108 $4,314 $4,529 $4,643 $4,759 $4,878 $5,000 C32 Police Captain $4,008 $4,209 $4,419 $4,529 $4,643 $4,759 $4,879 Assistant City Manager/Personnel Coordinator C31 Public Works Superintendent $3,910 $4,106 $4,311 $4,419 $4,529 $4,643 $4,759 Assistant Director of Finance C29 Liquor Stores Manager $3,722 $3,908 $4,103 $4,206 $4,311 $4,419 $4,529 C26 Management Information Systems Coordinator $3,456 $3,629 $3,810 $3,906 $4,003 $4,103 $4,206 Earle Brown Heritage Center Manager C25 Planning and Zoning Specialist $3,372 $3,541 $3,718 $3,810 $3,906 $4,003 $4,103 C23 Public Works Coordinator $3,209 $3,370 $3,538 $3,627 $3,718 $3,810 $3,906 Ln C22 Inspector/Building Official $3,131 $3,288 $3,452 $3,538 $3,627 $3,718 $3,810 Staff Accountant C21 Community Development Specialist $3,055 $3,208 $3,368 $3,452 $3,538 $3,627 $3,718 C20 Program Supervisor, Recreation $2,980 $3,129 $3,286 $3,368 $3,4521 $3,538 $3,627 Earle Brown Heritage Center Maintenance Supervisor I C19 Administrative Analyst, Police $2,908 $3,053 $3,206 $3,296 $3,368 $3,452 $3,538 C18 EBHC Sales Director $2,837 $2,979 $3,127 $3,206 $3,286 $3,368 $3,452 EBHC Innkeeper C16 Maintenance Supervisor $2,700 $2,835 $2,977 $3,051 $3,127 $3,206 $3,286 C12 Staff Services Supervisor, Police $2,446 $2,568 $2,697 $2,764 $2,833 $2,904 $2,977 Administrative Assistant/Deputy City Clerk Earle Brown Heritage Center Salesperson C8 Supervisor, Liquor Retail $2,631 $2,697 Golf Course Grounds Supervisor Aquatics Supervisor j! NORMAL PROGRESSION: Minimum is starting rate. After CITY MANAGER'S DISCRETION: The City Manager is authorized to set salaries below the minimum rate successful completion of probationary period, add five percent when performance or qualifications are less than required for the position. The City Manager is authorized to to starting rate. After 18 months of employment, an set salaries above the minimum starting rate when qualifications exceed those required for the starting rate. additional five percent of pay is added. Additional advances up MERIT STEPS: Merit steps of up to ten percent above the maximum rate shall only be awarded with express to the maximum shall be at the discretion of the City Manager. approval of the City Council as recommended by the City Manager. e • e City of Brooklyn Center SCHEDULE C FLSA Exempt Employees 1995 Employee Position and Classification Plan Positions Exempt from Overtime :::::..:::...::..::.:.::.::..:.:.:.::::..:.:::.::::;.;;:..;:;::: .::::::.:.::.::::.::::..:.::::: ::..:..::..........::... ... -lay ir X. C35 City Engineer $24.903 $26.148 $27.455 $28.142 $28.845 $29.566 $30.305 C34 Director of Recreation $24.295 $25.510 $26.786 $27.455 $28.142 $28.845 $29.566 C33 City Assessor $23.703 $24.888 $26.132 $26.786 $27.455 $28.142 $28.845 C32 Police Captain $23.125 $24.281 $25.495 $26.132 $26.786 $27.455 $28.142 Assistant City Manager /Personnel Coordinator C31 Public Works Superintendent $22.561 $23.689 $24.873 $25.495 $26.132 $26.786 $27.455 Assistant Director of Finance C29 Liquor Stores Manager $21.473 $22.547 $23.674 $24.266 $24.873 $25.495 $26.132 C26 Management Information Systems Coordinator $19.940 $20.937 $21.984 $22.534 $23.097 $23.674 $24.266 Earle Brown Heritage Center Manager C25 Planning and Zoning Specialist $19.454 $20.427 $21.448 $21.984 $22.534 $23.097 $23.674 C23 Public Works Coordinator $18.516 $19.442 $20.414 $20.925 $21.448 $21.984 $22.534 °" C22 Inspector /Building Official $18.065 $18.968 $19.917 $20.414 $20.925 $21.448 $21.984 Staff Accountant C21 Community Development Specialist $17.624 $18.505 $19.431 $19.917 $20.414 $20.925 $21.448 C20 Program Supervisor, Recreation $17.194 $18.054 $18.957 $19.431 $19.917 $20.414 $20.925 EBHC Maintenance Supervisor C19 Administrative Analyst, Police $16.775 $17.614 $18.494 $18.957 $19.431 $19.917 $20.414 C18 EBHC Sales Director $16.366 $17.184 $18.043 $18.494 $18.957 $19.431 $19.917 EBHC Innkeeper C16 Maintenance Supervisor $15.577 $16.356 $17.174 $17.603 $18.043 $18.494 $18.957 C12 Staff Services Supervisor, Police $14.112 $14.818 $15.559 $15.948 $16.346 $16.755 $17.174 Administrative Assistant/Deputy City Clerk Earle Brown Heritage Center Salesperson C8 Supervisor, Liquor Retail $ 12.785 $13.424 $14.095 $14.448 $14.809 $15.179 $15.559 Golf Course Grounds Supervisor Aquatics Supervisor NORMAL PROGRESSION: Minimum is starting rate. After CITY MANAGER'S DISCRETION: The City Manager is authorized to set salaries below the minimum rate successful completion of probationary period, add five percent when performance or qualifications are less than required for the position. The City Manager is authorized to to starting rate. After 18 months of employment, an set salaries above the minimum starting rate when qualifications exceed those required for the starting rate. additional five percent of pay is added. Additional advances up MERIT STEPS: Merit steps of up to ten percent above the maximum rate shall only be awarded with express to the maximum shall be at the discretion of the City Manager. approval of the City Council as recommended by the City Manager. • • City of Brooklyn Center SCHEDULE D FLSA Nonexempt Employees 1995 Employee Position and Classification Plan Positions Not Exempt from Overtime ...... .... ......... ....... .. ;.: ... ...... ..... ......... M B ... .... ....... D37 En Technician IV $18.866 $19.810 $20.800 $21.320 $21.853 $22.399 $22.959 Supervisor of Streets and Parks D34 Appraiser 11 $17.519 $18.395 $19.315 $19.798 $20.293 $20.800 $21.320 D33 Supervisor of Public Utilities $17.092 $17.947 $18.844 $19.315 $19.798 $20.293 $20.800 D31 Inspector, Community Development $16.268 $17.082 $17.936 $18.384 $18.844 $19.315 $19.798 D27 En Technician 111 $14.738 $15.475 $16.249 $16.655 $17.072 $17.498 $17.936 Public Services MIS Technician D25 Housin Inspector $14.0228 $14.730 $15.466 $15.853 $16.249 $16.655 $17.072 D24 Maintenance Custodian $13.686 $14.3701 $15.089 $15.466 $15.853 $16.249, $16.655 D21 Administration Secretar Cit Clerk $12.709 $13.344 $14.011 $14.362 $14.721 $15.089 $15.466 Public Services Administrative Aide I D20 Lead Custodian $12.399 $13.019 $13.670 $14.011 $14.362 $14.721 $15.089 Pa /Personnel Technician Public Safet Dispatcher Earle Brown Herita Center Maintenance Custodian Assessment Technician D17 Utilities Technician $11.514 $12.099 $12.694 $13.011 $13.336 $13.670 $14.011 Accountin Technician D14 Code Enforcement Officer $10.691 $11.226 $11.787 $12.082 $12.384 $12.694 $13.011 Property Room Supervisor Police Classification Operator En Secretar Assessin Secretar D13 Finance Secretar $10.431 $10.952 $11.500 $11.787 $12.092 $12.384 $12.694 Police Secretar Data Entry Operator Recreation Secretar Earle Brown Herita Center Secretar Comm Development Receptionist/Secretar Adm/Comm, Development Secretar Administration/Elections Secretar Public Services Clerical Technician City of Brooklyn Center SCHEDULE D FLSA Nonexempt Employees 1995 Employee Position and Classirication Plan Positions Not Exempt from Overtime ... ....... ... .. .......... . ........... ..... ........ ............... ............. ........... .... . .... ..... ........... Pu . exit ate D8 Switchboard Operator/Receptionist $9.219 $9.680 $10.164 $10.418 $10.679 $10.946 $11.219 Police Receptionist I EBHC Assistant Innkeeper D6 ICustodian $10.6:79 j NORMAL PROGRESSION: Minimum is startin rate. After successful completion of probationar period, add five percent to startin rate. After 18 months of employment, an additional five percent of pa is added. Additional advances up to the maximum shall be at the discretion of the City Manager. CITY MANAGER'S DISCRETION: The Cit Mana is authorized to set salaries below the minimum rate when performance or q ualifications are less than re for the position. The City Mana is authorized to I set salaries above the minimum startin rate when q ualifications exceed those re for the startin rate. 00 I MERIT STEPS: Merit steps of up to ten percent above the maximum rate shall onl be awarded with express approval of the Cit Council as recommended b the Cit Manager. Schedule E Page Left Blank Intentionally No settlement for LELS No. 82 Police Officers and Sergeants As Of December 15, 1994 Negotiations in Process -9- Schedule F Local Number 49 (Maintenance) Positions • Hourly Base Wage Rate Schedule NOTE: The following wage schedule will be in effect January 1 of each respective year: 1995': 1996 Hourly Base ,' Ho�irly Base Position Steps Wage Wage Rate Maintenance III $15.71 $16.18 Maintenance II 15.11 15.56 Maintenance I Step 3 14.06 14.48 Maintenance I Step 2 13.02 13.41 Maintenance I Step 1 11.97 12.33 Maintenance I Beginning 10.91 11.24 Mechanic 15.75 16.22 Night Service Person 14.86 15.31 Welding 15.44 15.90 Crew Leader 15.88 16.36 • (Assigned by supervisor) Working Out Of Classification Pay Employees required by the employer to operate certain items of heavy equipment will be paid the Maintenance III rate of pay for those hours assigned to the unit. Employees hired after February 7, 1984, in the Maintenance I classification who are required by the employer to operate certain items of light equipment will be paid the Maintenance II rate of pay for those hours assigned to the unit. Standby Pay Public utility employees who are designated by their supervisor to serve in a "standby" status on behalf of the City on a weekend will receive as compensation for such service five hours of overtime pay for the period beginning the end of the work day on Friday and ending the start of the work day on Monday when serving in such status. Public utility employees who are designated by their supervisors to serve in a "standby" status on behalf of the City on a week night (Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) that is not a holiday will receive as compensation for such service one hour of overtime for each week night served in such status. Public utility employees who are designated by their supervisors to serve in a "standby" status on behalf of the City on a holiday will receive as compensation for such service two (2) hours of overtime pay for each holiday served in such status. Such standby pay shall be in addition to other compensation which the employee is entitled to under this agreement. - 10- Schedule G 1995 Employee Insurance Benefits International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49, AFL -CIO • 1995 - The City will contribute, effective with insurance premiums due January 1, 1995, payment of an amount not to exceed $335 per month per employee toward the cost of coverage under the Brooklyn Center group hospital /medical insurance plans and group dental insurance as fringe benefit compensation for full -time employees and eligible dependents. Dental insurance not to exceed $30 per month. In addition, the City will provide a $10,000 group term life insurance policy. • 1996 - The City will contribute, effective with insurance premiums due January 1, 1996, payment of an amount not to exceed $350 per month per employee toward the cost of coverage under the Brooklyn Center group hospital /medical insurance plans and group dental insurance as fringe benefit compensation for full -time employees and eligible dependents. Dental insurance not to exceed $30 per month. In addition, the City will provide a $10,000 group term life insurance policy. Nonorganized City Employees The City will contribute, effective with insurance premiums due January 1, 1995, payment of an amount not to exceed $335 per month per employee toward the cost of coverage under the t Brooklyn Center group hospital /medical insurance plans and group dental insurance as fringe benefit compensation for full -time employees and eligible dependents. Dental insurance not to exceed $30 per month. In addition, the City will provide a $10,000 group term life insurance policy. City Manager As provided in the City Manager's personal service contract. Law Enforcement Labor Services, LELS No. 82 No settlement as of December 15, 1994 - Negotiations in process i -11- i Schedule H 1995 City Manager's Compensation Agreement THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of this 19th day of December 1994 by and between the City of Brooklyn Center, State of Minnesota, a municipal corporation (Employer), and Gerald G. Splinter (Employee). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Employer desires to employ the service of Employee as City Manager of the City of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council (Council) to provide certain benefits, to establish certain conditions of employment, and to set working conditions of the Employee; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Council to: (1) secure and retain the services of Employee; (2) make possible full work productivity to assuring Employee's morale and peace of mind with respect to future security; and (3) act as a deterrent against malfeasance or dishonesty for personal gain on the part of Employee. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this agreement, Employer and Employee agree as follows: s Section 1. Duties. Employer agrees to employ Employee as City Manager to perform the functions and duties specified in the Charter of the City and the City Code and to perform other legally permissible and proper duties and functions as the Council may from time -to -time assign to Employee. Section 2. Term. A. Nothing in this agreement prevents, limits, or otherwise interferes with the right of the Council to terminate the services of Employee at any time, subject only to the provisions set forth in Section 3 of this Agreement. B. Nothing in this agreement prevents, limits, or otherwise interferes with the right of the Employee to resign at any time, subject only to the provisions of Section 3 of this Agreement. C. Employee agrees to remain in the exclusive employ of Employer and neither to accept other employment nor to become employed by any other employer during the term of his employment. • The term "employed is not to be construed to include occasional teaching, writing, consulting, or military reserve service performed on Employee's time off. -12- 1995 City Manager's Compensation Agreement Schedule H Section 3. Termination and Severance Pay. A. In the event of dismissal by the Council, the Employee shall be notified at least 30 days in advance of the effective date of dismissal and shall be furnished a written statement of the reasons therefor, and further, shall be granted a hearing thereon, if requested. B. In the event of voluntary resignation or death, the Employee shall receive severance pay based on 100 percent of his unused vacation leave and one -third of his unused sick leave. C. In the event of involuntary resignation or dismissal, severance pay based on 100 percent of his unused vacation leave and one -third of his unused sick leave plus six months pay (to include health, dental, and life insurance premiums) shall be paid to the Employee. However, in the event that the Employee is terminated because of his conviction of any illegal act involving personal gain to him, the Employer shall have no obligation to pay the six - months severance sum designated in this paragraph. D. The Employee will give Employer 30 -days notice in advance of resignation, unless the parties agree to waive this notice. Section 4. Salary. Employee's salary for 1995 shall be $85,200 per annum and adjustment to the Employee's salary shall be reviewed annually in conjunction with the establishment of salaries for City employees. Section 5. Hours of Work. It is recognized Employee nized that Em to ee must devote substantial time outside normal office hours urs to business of the Employer; therefore, Employer recognizes that Employee will take time off during normal office hours consistent with Federal Fair Labor Standards Act regulations. Section 6. Automobile. Employee shall receive $250 per month if the Employer does not provide a car for the Employee's 24 -hour business use. Section 7. Vacation and Sick Leave. Employee shall be granted sick leave and holiday benefits granted to other employees and will earn four weeks vacation per year. • -13- 1995 City Manager's Compensation Agreement Schedule H Section 8. Disability, Health, and Life Insurance. The full premium cost for individual and family coverage under the Brooklyn Center group health and dental plan and /or insurance plan and the full premium cost for two times Employee's annual salary of term life insurance under the Brooklyn Center group life insurance plan shall be paid by the Employer on the Employee's behalf. It may be necessary, in order to maintain IRS nontax status of all employee insurance benefits, to modify this section of the Employee's compensation package. If the Director of Finance recommends modification in the payment of the Employee's insurance benefits as the simplest and most effective method for assuring "qualification" of Brooklyn Center's employee group insurance plans under IRS regulations, then the Employee's salary is to be adjusted an equivalent amount to compensate for any reduction in insurance benefits. Section 9. Retirement. Minnesota State Law provides city managers with a choice of pension plans: PERA or a deferred compensation fund. Employer will contribute to the qualified fund of the Employee's choice a dollar amount equivalent to the required PERA contribution. Section 10. Dues and Subscriptions. Employer agrees to budget and to pay for professional dues and subscriptions of Employee necessary for his continuation and full participation in national, regional, state, and local associations and organizations necessary and desirable for his continued professional participation, growth, and advancement and for the good of the Employer. Section 11. Professional Development. Employer will, at a minimum, provide the cost for the Employee to attend the state and /or national ICMA conferences or job- related courses, seminars, or training of equivalent cost. Section 12. General Expenses. Employer recognizes that certain expenses of a nonpersonal and generally job - affiliated nature will be incurred by Employee and agrees to reimburse or to pay those general expenses. Section 13. Indemnification. Employer will defend, save harmless, and indemnify Employee against any tort, professional liability claim or demand, or other legal action, whether groundless or otherwise, arising out of an alleged act or omission occurring in the performance of Employee's duties as City Manager. Employer will compromise and settle any claim or suit and pay the amount of • any settlement or judgment rendered thereon. Nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver on the limitations of the liability set forth in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. -14- 1995 City Manager's Compensation Agreement Schedule H • Section 14. Bonding. Employer will bear the full cost of any fidelity or other bonds required of the Employee under any law or ordinance. Section 15. Other Terms and Conditions of Employment. The Council, in consultation with the Employee, may fix such other terms and conditions of employment as it may determine from time -to -time relating to the performance of Employee, provided those terms and conditions are not inconsistent with or in conflict with the provisions of this Agreement, the City Charter, the City Code, or any other law. Section 16. No Reduction of Benefits. Employer will not at any time during the time of this Agreement reduce the salary, compensation, or other financial benefits of Employee, except to the degree of such reduction across - the -board for all employees of the Employer or as otherwise agreed by Employer and Employee. Section 17. Notices. Notices pursuant to this agreement are given by deposit in the custody of the United • States mail, postage paid, address as follows: A. Employer: City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Mayor 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 B. Employee: Gerald G. Splinter City Manager 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 Alternatively, notices required pursuant to this Agreement may be personally served in the same manner as is applicable to process in a civil action. Notice shall be deemed given as of the date of personal service or as of the date of deposit of such written notice in the United States mail. Section 18. General Provisions. A. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties. B. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs at law • g g P and executors of Employee. C. This Agreement is effective on January 1, 1995. - 15 - 1995 City Manager's Compensation Agreement Schedule H D. This Agreement may be amended at any time by mutual consent of Employer and Employee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Brooklyn Center by its City Council has caused this Agreement to be executed and delivered in its behalf by its Mayor and duly attested by its Deputy City Clerk, and the Employee has executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA EMPLOYER By Todd Paulson, Mayor Attest: Sharon Knutson, Deputy City Clerk EMPLOYEE Gerald G. Splinter -16- Schedule I 1995 Personnel Expense Reimbursement Policy It is necessary that there be a uniform policy of reimbursement for travel, lodging, meals, and mileage expenses incurred by City employees and officials while performing their duties as representatives of the City of Brooklyn Center. It is also necessary that existing reimbursement policies be reviewed annually and be adjusted when necessary to reflect the current costs of travel, lodging, meals, and the use of personal automobiles for business use. Therefore, all existing reimbursement policies are hereby amended to be as follows for costs incurred on January 1, 1995, and thereafter: A. Reimbursements of travel expenses are intended to refund actual costs incurred by City employees and officials while traveling as authorized representatives of the City of Brooklyn Center. B. In order to qualify for travel reimbursement, trips to a destination exceeding 100 miles from Brooklyn Center must have the prior approval of the City Manager. C. Requests for travel advances intended to defray costs incurred while on a trip and prior to submission of an expense report shall be submitted to the City Manager for approval at least seven days in advance of the trip. D. Travel advances shall be limited to 90 percent of the estimated expenses for lodging, meals, and other related travel expenses. Costs of transportation and registration shall be advanced in full. E. A properly verified, itemized expense claim shall be submitted to the City Manager for approval within ten days following the date of return from an authorized trip. Expense claims shall be accompanied by receipts for: 1. Transportation costs to and from the destination via coach, tourist, or economy class transportation. 2. Lodging costs not to exceed a reasonable single- occupancy rate as determined by the City Manager. 3. Conference or meeting registration fees. 4. Any unusual items for which advance approval has been obtained from the City Manager. F. The mode of transportation must be approved by the City Manager prior to any authorized trip. Personal automobile use for authorized trips will be reimbursed at a rate consistent with IRS regulations, or an amount equal to air travel tourist class, whichever is lesser. -17- 1995 Personnel Expense Reimbursement Policy Schedule I G. Reimbursement for meals while on authorized travel will be for actual expenditures with • a maximum of $31 per day allowable, plus a maximum of 15 percent gratuities. When traveling for less than a full day, the following per meal maximums will be allowed: Breakfast - $ 7.00 Lunch - 9.00 Dinner - 15.00 H. Employees and officials of the City shall be reimbursed for luncheon and dinner costs as authorized by the following the City Manager in accordance with g p rovisions: 1. The full cost shall be reimbursed for meals which are a scheduled activity of a conference or meeting and the cost of such meals is not included in the registration fee. 2. The entire cost of related meals shall be reimbursed to those employees or officials designated to represent the City at meetings or other City business functions that the Council or City Manager deems necessary. I. Employees or officials of the City who, in the conduct of official City business, are authorized or required to use their personal automobiles for transportation shall be reimbursed at the rate consistent with IRS regulations for mileage incurred in the conduct of such business. An itemized mileage expense claim must be submitted to the City Manager for approval. J. Certain employees of the City are required to drive a City vehicle to their home and keep it there while off duty. They must do so to be able to respond to emergency situations. These emergency situations include fire and police protection, civil defense, and restoring City services such as water, sewer, and streets. It may also be necessary to keep a City vehicle at home for security purposes or other City business purposes. These vehicles must be used for City business use only and cannot be used for the personal use of any employee. The employees who are authorized to keep a City vehicle at their home on a regular basis while off duty are as follows: 1. Director of Emergency Management 2. Chief of Police 3. Fire Chief 4. Supervisor of Street and Parks Maintenance 5. Supervisor of Public Utilities 6. Liquor Stores' Manager • -18- Schedule J 1995 Employee Training Policy In 1964, the City Council established a policy pertaining to employee training. The purpose of the policy is to promote and encourage employees of the City of Brooklyn Center to pursue further education and training to increase awareness and proficiency in their positions. In support of this policy, it is hereby amended to be as follows for costs incurred on January 1, 1995, and thereafter: Voluntary Participation Training The City of Brooklyn Center will reimburse to City employees attending job - related courses who have been employed by the City of Brooklyn Center, on a full -time basis of a period of at least 18 months, 60 percent of the cost incurred by the employee for the payment of tuition, fees, and purchases of textbooks required for such courses, provided the conditions listed below are met. Employees who have been employed by the City of Brooklyn Center on a full -time basis with at least five complete years of employment will receive 75 percent of the cost incurred for tuition, fees, and textbooks, provided the following conditions have been met: A. The course has been approved by the City Manager prior to registration for, or participation in, the course. B. The employee attains a grade of "C" or better in the course; or in those cases where grades are not assigned, the employee must show proof of satisfactory completion of the course. C. The employee has submitted, on forms to be provided by the City Manager's office, a written critique of the course, stated the value of the training to his or her position, and made such suggestions as may be pertinent for the conduct of future training sessions. D. The attendance of the employee at course sessions has been satisfactory. E. Individuals who are receiving compensation or reimbursement for education costs from the federal or state government shall not be eligible for additional reimbursement from the City. Required Participant Training In those instances where the City Manager deems it necessary or advisable that an employee attend training sessions, the City shall pay all costs for fees, tuition, and textbooks. The employee shall attend such courses or training sessions on his or her regular work time, or if such courses are only after regular work hours, compensatory time shall be granted to the employee. Upon completion of the training, the employee shall submit a critique of the course as required in paragraph C above. -19- Schedule K 1995 Retirement -Paid Health Insurance Program Minnesota Statutes 1990, Section 471.61, requires local governments to allow a former employee and the employee's dependents to continue to participate indefinitely in the employer - sponsored hospital, medical, and dental insurance group that the employee participated in immediately before retirement, provided the former employee is receiving a disability benefit or an annuity from a Minnesota public pension plan other than a volunteer firefighter plan, or has met age and service requirements necessary to receive an annuity from such a plan. However, the statutes do not mandate that the City contribute towards the payment of the premium for such insurance. The City Council has determined it is in the best interest of the City of Brooklyn Center that retiring employees have available to the, at their option, a quality health insurance program and that the City should participate in the cost of that health insurance program for long -time employees until the retiree reaches age 65 or becomes eligible for Medicare coverage. On August 13, 1990, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 90 -166 establishing the City's Retirement Health Insurance Program with the intent to provide retirement health insurance coverage for employees retiring after that date and on or before December 15, 1995. However, Minnesota Statutes 179A.20, Subdivision 2a, limits the period of time which a City may obligate itself to pay benefits provided by Resolution Number 90 -166. The City Council has determined the period shall be one year. The Council has also determined it is in the best interest of the City to continue such benefits as are provided by Resolution Number 90 -166 and to include the • program with the City's Employee Position and Classification Plan. Therefore, the City Council has determined to continue the Retirement Health Insurance Program with the following provisions: A. Qualified employees shall have the option of retaining membership in the City of Brooklyn Center's employee health insurance plan for which the City will pay the single - person premium until such time as the retiree is eligible for Medicare coverage or at age 65; whichever is sooner. If the retiree desires to continue the family coverage and if such coverage is available under the City's policies, the additional cost for family coverage shall be paid monthly by the retiree to the City of Brooklyn Center. In lieu of City payment of the single - person premium, the qualified employee may elect to receive a lump -sum payment of an amount calculated by multiplying the number of months between the date on which the employee retires and the employee's 65th birthday times the monthly average single - person premium which the City is paying for employees at the time of the employee's retirement. B. To qualify under this program, an employee, on the day of his /her retirement, must meet eligibility requirements for a full- retirement annuity under PERA or PERA Police without reduction of benefits because of age, disability, or any other reason for reduction. In addition, to be eligible for this program, an employee must have been employed full time by the City of Brooklyn Center for the last ten consecutive years prior to the effective date of his /her retirement. Employees participate in this program on a voluntary basis. -20- 1995 Retirement Health Insurance Program Schedule K • C. Eligible employees, as described in provision "B" above, who become disqualified from participation under the policies of the City's health insurance carriers because of a move out of the service area of such carriers, may elect to continue participation in this program as follows: The employee may recommend to the City an insurance carrier providing health insurance in the area to which the employee has moved. Upon approval of the carrier by the City, qualification for coverage by the employee and submission of any additional information reasonably required by the City, the City will make monthly payments to the carrier on behalf of the employee for premiums for such policy up to the amount paid by the City for the lowest single - person premium of the City's employee health insurance plans at the time of payment. Any additional amount required shall be paid by the eligible employee. Eligible employees electing this option must prove residence in a noncovered geographic area and must submit a written notice of election to the City Manager on a form provided by the City. Once an eligible employee has been removed from coverage under the City's group health insurance plans pursuant to such an election, the employee may not thereafter re -enter the group and will not be covered under the City's group policies. D. The City Manager is authorized to administer the Retirement Health Insurance program and to fund this program from the City of Brooklyn Center's Employees' Retirement Fund until such funds are depleted, at which time the program will be funded from the General Fund. E. The obligations imposed on the City by the program are subject to the limitations of law, including Minnesota Statutes 179.20, Subdivision 2a, pursuant to which such obligations will expire unless re- enacted from time -to -time by the City Council. F. In accordance with provision "E" above, the provisions of this program shall apply only to employees retiring on or before December 31, 1995. G. In the event the City discontinues providing group health insurance coverage for active employees or in the event the City discontinues this program any time after the date specified in provision "F" above, all benefits provided for in this policy, including benefits to retirees under the program, will also be discontinued. H. In the event the City decides to discontinue the Retirement -Paid Health Insurance Program for active employees at the next expiration date, consideration will be given to continue the program for employees who had previously retired under the provisions of the program. -21- Schedule L 1995 Severance Benefits For Laid -Off Employees Program Due to severe budget constraints, the City Council has found it necessary in some budget years to reduce the number of City employees through layoffs. To recognize the hardship of such layoffs, the City Council has determined it is in the best interest of the City of Brooklyn Center to offer some severance benefits to certain employees. Therefore, the City Council has determined to offer the Severance Benefits for Laid -Off Employees Program with the following provisions: A. Employees qualified for severance benefits are those who are employed in a full -time capacity as a benefits - earning employee with the City of Brooklyn Center at the time of layoff and will not be re- employed by the City in another full -time position. Employees participate in this program on a voluntary basis. B. At the City's expense, qualified employees may, at their choosing, participate in an outplacement service at a cost not to exceed $2,000 or within six months of layoff, whichever is reached first. Outplacement services consist of a career assessment, resume' development, cover letter writing assistance, interviewing skills, networking, and developing job resources, all of which are provided by a professionally qualified outplacement service. C. The qualified employees will be allowed to continue health and life insurance coverage held at the time of layoff pursuant to COBRA law. The City will the portion of the Y P Y pay P premium costs for which other City employees are eligible for a period of three months after the lay -off date or earlier if other coverage is provided by another employer. D. In addition to any other severance pay to which the qualified employee is entitled, severance pay equal to two weeks salary shall be paid to qualified employees who have been employed by the City less that ten years; and severance pay equal to four weeks salary shall be paid to qualified employees who have been employed full -time by the City for ten or more years. E. The City Manager is authorized to administer the Severance Benefits for Laid -Off Employees Program and to fund this program from the City of Brooklyn Center's Employees' Retirement Fund until such funds are depleted, at which time the program will be funded from the General Fund. F. In the event the City discontinues providing group health insurance coverage for active employees or in the event the City discontinues this program, all benefits provided for in provision "C" above paid for by the City will also be discontinued. -22- II • 12f will be delivered to the City Council members on Friday, December 16. Council Meeting Date December 19,19% 3 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number Isa" Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1994 AND 1995 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO CARRY FORWARD APPROVED APPROPRIATIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $500 FOR INITIAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH POLICE MOBILE DIGITAL TERMINALS (MDT'S) Department Approval: Scott Kline, Acting Chief of Poli Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report . Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Pass Resolution Amending the 1994 and 1995 General Fund Budget to Carry Forward Approved Appropriations in the Amount of $500 for Initial Costs Associated with Police Mobile Digital Terminals • (MDT's) Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached no At its November 28, 1994, City Council Meeting, the Brooklyn Center City Council authorized the City of Brooklyn Center to join the LOGIS Mobile Digital Terminal (MDT) Group and provide for the financing thereof. With the exception of $500, all of the initial costs associated for MDT's have been expended in 1994. The remaining $500 is marked for the radio modem set -up connection which can not be expended until the hardware is installed in the squads. MDT's will be installed in all marked squads in early 1995. • Member introduced the following resolution and 40 moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1994 AND 1995 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO CARRY FORWARD APPROVED APPROPRIATIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $500 FOR INITIAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH POLICE MOBILE DIGITAL TERMINALS (MDT'S) WHEREAS, Section 7.08 of the City Charter does provide the City Council with the authority to appropriate funds from accumulated surplus in an amount equal to a previous appropriation in the General Fund Budget, if not in fact expended or encumbered for that purpose in the previous fiscal years; and WHEREAS, the expenditure for initial costs associated with MDT's for the police department was approved at the November 28, 1994, City Council Meeting ; and WHEREAS, the police department is unable to receive the MDT hardware until the first part of 1995; and WHEREAS, the police department is requesting the appropriations be carried • forward to the 1995 Budget; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that: 1. The 1994 General Fund Budget be amended for amounts to be carried forward to 1995 as follows: a. Reduce the estimated revenues of the Transfers from Fund Balance Account by $500. b. Reduce the appropriations of the police department by $500. 2. The 1995 General Fund Budget be amended for amounts to be carried forward from 1994 as follows: a. Increase the estimated revenues of the Transfers from Fund Balance Account by $500. b. Increase the appropriations of the police department by $500. i Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • Council Mating Date December 19, 1994 3 Crty of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item N.ba, 3 b Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1994 AND 1995 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO CARRY FORWARD APPROVED APPROPRIATIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $62,000 FOR THE HENNEPIN COUNTY PHOTO IMAGING SYSTEM Department Approval: \ Scott Kline, Acting Chief of Police. Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Pass Resolution Amending the 1994 and 1995 General Fund Budget to Carry Forward Approved Appropriations in the Amount of $62,000 for the Hennepin County Photo Imaging System 0 Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached no) As part of its consideration of the 1994 budget, Brooklyn Center City Council authorized the purchase and installation of the Hennepin County Photo Imaging System to be located in the Brooklyn Center Police Department Holding Facility. At the time of 1994 budget preparation a vendor was not selected to provide such a system and only an estimated cost of $40,000 was provided by Hennepin County officials. In the winter of 1993 -94 Hennepin County, through an RFP process, selected XImage Corporation as the vendor. Agencies could not purchase the Photo Imaging System under County Contract until software and hardware were established, approved, and ready to be disseminated to other interested agencies under Hennepin County standards. Hennepin County accepted the system fully in late Fall, 1994, enabling Brooklyn Center to join the system at a cost of $62,000. The City Council appropriated $41,616 in the 1994 budget for the purpose of acquiring the Photo Imaging System. It is the recommendation of both the City Manager and Acting Chief of Police to transfer the remaining necessary funding of $20,384 from personnel services. Funds are available under personnel services due to vacancies within the police department in 1994. • �3b • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1994 AND 1995 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO CARRY FORWARD APPROVED APPROPRIATIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $62,000 FOR THE HENNEPIN COUNTY PHOTO IMAGING SYSTEM WHEREAS, Section 7.08 of the City Charter does provide the City Council with the authority to appropriate funds from accumulated surplus in an amount equal to a previous appropriation in the General Fund Budget, if not in fact expended or encumbered for that purpose in the previous fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center as part of its consideration of the 1994 budget authorized the purchase and installation of the Hennepin County Photo Imaging System in the Brooklyn Center Police Department Holding Facility; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County, through an RFP process, selected the vendor XImage in the winter of 1993 -94; and . WHEREAS, agencies joining Hennepin County could not purchase the system until software and hardware were established, approved, and ready to be disseminated to other agencies; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County accepted the system fully in late Fall, 1994 enabling Brooklyn Center to join the system at a cost of $62,000; and WHEREAS, the City Council appropriated $41,616 in the 1994 budget for the purpose of acquiring the Photo Imaging System; and WHEREAS, there is $20,384 available in the police department budget in the area of personnel due to vacancies which may be transferred to cover the additional cost of the Photo Imaging System. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that: 1. The 1994 police department appropriations are amended to transfer $20,384 from personnel services to capital outlay. 2. The 1994 General Fund Budget be amended for amounts to be carried forward to 1995 as follows: • a. Reduce the estimated revenues of the Transfers from Fund Balance • RESOLUTION NO. Account by $56,152. b. Increase the appropriations of the contingency account by $5,848. C. Reduce the appropriations of the police department by $62,000. 3. The 1995 General Fund Budget be amended for amounts to be carried forward from 1994 as follows: a. Increase the estimated revenues of the Transfers from Fund Balance Account by $62,000. b. Increase the appropriations of the police department by $62,000. I Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • Council Meeting Date December 19. 1994 Crty of f Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number /3C Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1994 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO RESCIND APPROVED APPROPRIATION FROM THE DRUG FORFEITURE FUND IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,500 FOR STATE OF MINNESOTA TRAFFIC ACCIDENT REPORT COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT IS UNAVAILABLE Department Approval: Scott Kline, Acting Chief of Police Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Pass Resolution Amending the 1994 General Fund Budget to Rescind Approved Appropriation from the • Drug Forfeiture Fund in the Amount of $1,500 for State of Minnesota Traffic Accident Report Computer Software that is Unavailable Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached no) At its February 28, 1994 City Council meeting, the Brooklyn Center City Council authorized the transfer of funds from the Drug Forfeiture Fund for several purchases of police department items that were requested, resolution 94 -38. One of these items was State of Minnesota Traffic Accident Report computer software. Shortly after funds were approved, the police department was informed that the provider of the software had gone bankrupt. The police department has been unable to find another vendor that produces software for the State of Minnesota Traffic Accident Report and requests that the $1,500 appropriated be returned to the Drug Forfeiture Fund. . Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1994 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO RESCIND APPROVED APPROPRIATION FROM DRUG FORFEITURE FUND IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,500 FOR STATE OF MINNESOTA TRAFFIC ACCIDENT REPORT COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT IS UNAVAILABLE WHEREAS, 70% of the sale of property from drug forfeiture funds is to be used by the Brooklyn Center Police Department as a supplement to its operating fund for use in law enforcement; and WHEREAS, the City Council authorized the transfer of funds from the Drug Forfeiture Fund in Resolution 94 -38 to provide funding for computer software for State of Minnesota Traffic Accident Report; and WHEREAS, the provider of this software went bankrupt shortly after approval of the funds and the police department is unable to locate another provider. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of • Brooklyn Center that: 1. The 1994 General Fund Budget be amended to rescind approved appropriation from the Drug Forfeiture Fund in the amount of $1,500 for State of Minnesota Traffic Accident Report Computer Software that is unavailable Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: S whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Meeting Date December 19, 1994 31 Cray of f Broold yn Center Agenda Item Number � 3 Request For Council Consideration Item Description: CONSIDERATION FOR RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE OF INVESTIGATOR DONALD SPEHN. IYepartment Approval: Scott Kline, Acting Chief of Police Manager's Review/Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: The City Council Approve the issuance of Resolution expressing recognition of and appreciation for the dedicated public service of Investigator Donald Spehn • Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached yes Please see attached Resolution in reference to Investigator Spehn. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND APPRECIATIONFOR THE DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE OF INVESTIGATOR DONALD SPEHN. WHEREAS, Investigator Donald Spehn has served the City of Brooklyn Center as an outstanding member of the law enforcement community since January 17, 1966, and did retire from City employment on November 30, 1994; and WHEREAS, Investigator Spehn has successfully fulfilled the roles of patrol officer, investigator assignee short term, investigator assignee long term; and WHEREAS, Investigator Spehn was the first long term investigative assignee of the Brooklyn Center Police Department; and WHEREAS, Investigator Spehn developed expertise in sex crime investigation, homicide investigation, and most recently arson investigation while assigned to the division; and WHEREAS, Investigator Spehn served as the unpromoted supervisor trainer and mentor to the investigative division; and • WHEREAS, Investigator Spehn has been recognized throughout the region for his expertise in all phases of criminal investigation by not only investigators, but attorneys and judges as well; and WHEREAS, the breath of his experience far surpass any investigator for the department and was sought after by all. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the dedicated public service of Donald Spehn is recognized and appreciated by the City of Brooklyn Center and that the City wishes him a long and fulfilling retirement. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member favor thereof: and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in • and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Meeting Date 12/19194 3 City o f Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number �3 E Request For Council Consideration Item Description: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, 1994- 03 &04, 57TH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT Department Approval: C Diane - Spector, Director of bjic Services Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: A resolution awarding a contract to the firm of Short- Elliott - Hendrickson (SEH) is included for consideration. . Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached Yes ) The Council on July 25, 1994, directed staff to solicit proposals for professional services regarding improvement project numbers 1994- 03 &04. Said professional services include preliminary improvement project design; development of a cooperative agreement between the City and Hennepin County for the segment of the roadway between Logan Avenue and Humboldt Avenue; extensive storm sewer modelling and design; final improvement project design; state aid approvals; and construction management services. The RFP was sent to three firms which provide a broad array of municipal engineering services, and which expressed an interest in receiving RFPs: Short- Elliot - Hendrickson (SEH), Westwood Professional Services, Inc., and HNTB. Two firms chose to submit proposals: SEH and Westwood. The proposals which were submitted were reviewed by myself and by Senior Engineering Technician David Anderson. The format for proposal review was a variant of Qualification Based Selection'. Review criteria included: • Company stability, breadth of experience, and qualifications of key project personnel • Successful completion of similar projects • Experience in storm drainage analysis and understanding of the City's needs • Emphasis on public relations • 'For the Council's further information, I have recently been appointed by the Minnesota Public Works Association as its representative to the board of the Minnesota Coalition for Qualification Based Selection. Request For Council Consideration Page 2 Qualification Based Selection focuses on selecting the most qualified and best fitting consultant, with cost being an important but secondary factor. Both consultants submitted an estimate of time • required to complete the various tasks which would be required, and fee schedules. Based on the criteria above, the review committee recommended award of a professional services contract to the firm of Short- Elliott- Hendrickson (SEH). While both firms are qualified and both have successfully provided professional services for the City, SEH appears to be more qualified in the critical area of storm drainage analysis. It is especially crucial that this project be treated carefully because the solution implemented on 57th Avenue will provide the backbone for and dictate drainage improvements throughout the entire southeast neighborhood. Estimated fees as proposed by the two consultants are very similar. SEH estimates that its fees over the course of the project would total about $166,000. Westwood proposed an estimated hourly fee for the preliminary work, and a percent of construction fee for the final design and construction management that would total about $158,000, given the estimated project cost of $1.1 million. Westwood did not include the cost of soil borings in its estimate, while SEH did; if this is factored in, Westwood's fees would be about $162,000. At my request, SEH has recast its proposal in terms of Phase I and Phase II services. Phase I services, the development of preliminary plans and a feasibility report, are proposed to be completed at an amount not to exceed $27,600. Phase II services, divided into final design and construction management, are estimated at $138,400. It is anticipated that the cost estimate for Phase II services will be evaluated and adjusted based on selection of a final design. • The cost of these professional services will be funded from Municipal State Aid and the storm drainage utility. / i� Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONA SERVICES, - L S ICES, 1994 03 & 04, 57TH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, on July 25, 1994, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 94 -154, authorizing the development of an RFP for professional services for improvement project numbers 1994 -03 & 04 for street and utility improvements on 57th Avenue North, Logan to Camden Avenue; and WHEREAS, said professional services include preliminary design, development of a cooperative agreement between the City and Hennepin County, storm drainage analysis, state aid approvals, and construction management services; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the "Policy for Procurement for Professional Services ", the Director of Public Services has obtained proposals from Short- Elliot - Hendrickson (SEH) and Westwood Professional Services, Inc. to provide the professional services as related to the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED b the City Council of the City of Y Y Y Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The proposal for services submitted by SEH is hereby accepted and approved. 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract with SEH on the basis of their proposal. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: ® and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 'Aw 3535 vADN ;S CErvT�h Carte 2CO S&I : E,v*Ep. ST. PAUL. wl551 to 012 aso _^Coo 8co �2c5� A »G?1TEt:TUAE ENGINEERING - ENV1A'.N!tEMAL TRANSPORTATION • December 15,1994 RE: Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 57th Avenue North Street Improvements City Improvement Project No. 1994-03 & 4 SEI-I No. P- BROCT9501 Ms. Diane Spector Director of Public Services City of Brooklyn Center 6301 SI -dngle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, INli� 55430 Dens Ms. Spector: We wish to thank- the City of Brooklyn Center for selecting SEH to provide engineering services for City Improvement Project No. 1994 -03 R: 4; 57th Avenue North Street Improvements. In accordance with your request, we are providing you with a contract for your review and approval of the City Council for Phase I, Feasibility Study. It is our understanding that we will scope out the plans and specifications with City staff after the feasibility study is complete and we can more accurately estimate the time .required to perform design. We will then scope the construction enginee cost upon completion of the plans and specifica We have included the portion of our proposal pertaining to the feasibility study with this letter. We have included a cost not to exceed or 27,C00.00 in the - :ontract enclosed. We have also included a schedule with "bench mark" dates in the enclosed contract. These dates are also included in our Deceml er 2, 199= proposal. I trust this contract will meet with your approval. If the City; desires any changes, please let me know and 1 will accommodate your schedule. -, - ��- selection ', committee or selecting SEFI to g g provide enineerin a� 'n I wish t th ank- use se_e�tz�n �Jm�mitj'e f .. p a ,. Once ..ai us o b services for this project and we look for>v and to w orki--ig with the City once again. Sincerely, Richard E. Mo ore, ?.E kanl Encl osures ELL i(:C :.:V ;F =, A . r ✓. Gr'. r iJr _LJ. Vvi BROOKLYN CENTER, mu 51111. AVE. NOnTil WORK PLAN - TASK HOUR BUDGET TOTAL PROJECT PROJECT TRAFFIG ()ESlGN SENIOR SURVEY WORD sun COST MANAGER ENGINEER ENGINEER IECK TECH CREIN PROCESSOR CONTRACTOR EXPENSES VILEAGE 1.0 FEASIBILITY STUDY _0 -PMJttTTftlrlA-flOff_ - 1 WIM Cfl'afMFP _'_­_­_____"_____.___.._'__ ­ I ­­_ 2 4 - _4 $26.06 �5 2f, iff-MMifiTY 2 _ 47 -_ -- -- _! _—__ -- -- . ij MAOINd -_ -- -- - I i f.6 6: -0.1iffAnY SLIAVP-Yg 2.6 p rfc _ __ _. _ -1t- _ I_- Z.L 2. 601 1 2 F 2.s____sOlcs 2.4.4 pnEPAR 14 C - Mff SUM - 16 -- �o 10 - N Ps 4.6 OBTAIN PRIVATE UTILITY IRPOTI P;Rtf0t TOTAL HOURS 16 iS 78 33 48 18 ` _ �_ - - - _ COST ESTIMATEE 61,584.80 $1.10-1.001 1;5.49 1 1.201 $0.227.18 $953.7D 3 $1,040.801 S3,700,00 $140.00 TOTAL COST $27.(k4.40j_ PAGE NO. 1 Council Meeting Date 12/19/94 3 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Numner —! Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: RESOLUTION AMENDING ADMINISTRATIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR WATERSHED COMMISSION FEES FOR PROJECT REVIEWS AND VARIANCE REQUESTS Department Approval: Diane Spector, D' ct�r of Public Services / P Manager's Review /Recommendation: A6C-a& No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: A resolution amending the administrative fee schedule to reflect the new watershed variance fees is attached for Council consideration. • Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached Yes ) As the Council is aware, Brooklyn Center is a member of two Watershed Management Organizations, the Shingle Creek WMO and the West Mississippi WMO. Both commissions recently took actions to amend their fees for reviewing and approving proposed developments. This item is to amend the City's administrative fee schedule to reflect these new fees. In general, the Watersheds are required to review and approve drainage plans for any development on sites larger than five acres, or smaller developments which meet other criteria. On occasion, developers request that they be allowed to vary from the Watershed's standards for storm drainage and water treatment. Since these developers are requesting the special benefit of a variance from established policies, both Commissions have agreed that the cost of engineering review by the watersheds' consulting engineers should be paid by the parties requesting the variance. Currently, the cost of variances is paid for through the Commissions' regular budgets, which are comprised of funding contributed by the member cities. Some cities pay these dues from the General Fund; others, such as Brooklyn Center, pay their share of the annual budget from their Storm Drainage Utility. (For the Council's information, in 1994 Brooklyn Center contributed $32,196.25 to the two watersheds in annual dues.) Both Commissions have enacted resolutions requiring the submission of a $2,000 escrow deposit to accompany requests for a watershed variance. Funds remaining after work is complete would be returned to the developer; if additional funds are needed, the variance is not approved until additional funds to cover costs are received. • In a separate action, the West Mississippi WMO has enacted a resolution to require a $1,000 fee to process a project review. Residential properties and reviews for governmental entities are exempted from the fee. West Mississippi is a small WMO, and this fee proposal results from continued budget shortfalls. . Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING ADMINISTRATIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR WATERSHED COMMISSION FEES FOR PROJECT REVIEWS AND VARIANCE REQUESTS WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is a member of two joint powers organizations, the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Organization and the West Mississippi Watershed Management Organization; and WHEREAS, the Commissions of those organizations have enacted certain fees for project reviews and variance requests to help defray the costs of providing those services. q P Y P g NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that the City's Administrative fee schedule is hereby amended to establish the following fees: WATERSHED VARIANCE REQUEST Shingle Creek Watershed: Actual Watershed Engineer's fees, with $2,000 escrow at time of application • West Mississippi Watershed: Actual Watershed Engineer's fees, with PP g $ 2 t time of application 000 escrow w a o PP WATERSHED PROJECT REVIEW Shingle Creek Watershed: None. West Mississippi Watershed: $1,000, except single family residential and governmental entity courtesy reviews, at the Commission's discretion Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • RESOLUTION NO. 94-2 A RESOLUTION REQUIRING MEMBER CITIES AND /OR APPLICANTS TO PAY THE COSTS OF PROCESSING PROJECT REVIEWS WHEREAS, the West Mississippi Watershed Management Commission now has substantial experience in the review of projects which are subject to the Commission's statutory and assigned responsibility, and WHEREAS, a pattern has been established which indicates that over the past four years the average cost for project reviews have risen to $1,020 for each review, and WHEREAS, this Commission believes that the applicants and the projects requiring review should be responsible for those costs, and it Is determined that a project review fee should be established which will be charged to the municipality when the request for project review is filed with the Commission, and WHEREAS, the engineer has recommended that initially the fee be established at $1,000 for a normal project review and that said fee be required to be submitted to the Commission at the time the request for project review is filed with the Commission, and • WHEREAS, the Commission has discussed whether a set fee should be established or an escrow deposit be required to cover all the costs, and it is determined that initially a set fee would be established to avoid the necessary bookkeeping and accounting requirements for escrow accounts, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the West Mississippi Watershed Management Commission, as follows: 1. That commencing on January 1, 1995, any project reviews, applications, or referrals by cities shall be accompanied by a fee of $1,000. The responsibility for the payment of this fee shall rest with the municipality wherein the project is located. The Commission strongly recommends that all member municipalities establish procedures to collect the $1,000 from the applicants so that uniformity is maintained through the watershed, but this Resolution places the responsibility on the municipality and does not attempt to establish how the municipality will raise that fee. 2. The Commission may waive the required fee if the project relates to a submission for a government project (i.e., MnDOT, Hennepin County, or a City project) or for a single family project which is of a minor nature. . 3. The Recording Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to send a copy of this Resolution to each member city's chief administrative officer. Commissioner Jack Bittle made a motion to adopt the foregoing resolution and Commissioner Diane Spector seconded the motion. The following voted in favor thereof: Spector, Bittle, Gerald Butcher, and David Callister; and the following voted against the motion: none; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 13th day of October, 1994. Gerald E. Butcher, Chairman Attest: Judie A. Anderson, Recording Secretary • . RESOLUTION NO. 4- 3 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 90-1 TO INCORPORATE 90 -1 EXHIBIT A - VARIANCES, SECTION B WHEREAS, Resolution 90-1 was adopted on March 8, 1990, establishing regulations for non - conforming uses and the granting of variances, and WHEREAS, attached to Resolution 90-1 was Exhibit A which set forth the management standards for new development, redevelopment, and additions to existing development, and established regulations for non - conforming uses and the granting of variances, and WHEREAS, the Commission has not charged a fee to process applications for variances, and over the past four years the Commission has gained experience and realizes the engineering review costs and other associated costs are very expensive to the Commission, and WHEREAS, project review of variance requests since adoption of Resolution 90-1 have ranged from a low of $806 to a high of $2627, and the average cost to perform the engineering services to process a variance Is $1985, and WHEREAS, it is deemed fair and equitable that the persons seeking the variance pay the costs of those reviews, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the West Mississippi Watershed Management Commission, as follows: 1. That Exhibit A, Subsection B of the section of Resolution 90 -1 entitled "Variances" shall be amended to read as follows: Variances B. Referral to West Mississippi Watershed Management Commission. All applications for variances shall be referred by the City to the Commission's Engineer and shall be reviewed by the Commission considering the criteria and standards and the goals of minimizing pollution of public waters. All adoiications for variances referred by a member city/ to the Commission's Engineer shall be paid for by member cities and /or the party seeking the variance Costs and expenses incurred by the Commission will be billed directly to the • member city (member cities are responsible for collecting fees from the applicant who is seeking a variance. A.n escrow amount of $2.000 shall be deposited with the Commission by the member city at the time of filing of the original application • The Commission and its staff will advise the member city if costs and expenses are expected to exceed the original deposit filed with the application. Services will not be performed beyond monies on deposit unless the member city has agreed in writing to be reapprisible for the costs of those services. The Commission shall set forth such conditions relating to the granting of a variance as they deem necessary to adjust the hardship or special situation so as to carry out the intent and purpose of this policy or shall deny the request and set forth reasons for the denial. 2. This Resolution shall become effective on applications received on January 1, 1995, and thereafter. 3. The Recording Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to send a copy of this Resolution to each member city's administrative officer. Commissioner Diane Spector made a motion to adopt the foregoing resolution and Commissioner David Caliister seconded the motion. The following voted in favor thereof: Spector, Jack Bittle, Gerald Butcher, and Callister; and the following voted against the motion: none; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 13th day of October, 1994. Gerald E. Butcher, Chairman Attest: ILL Judie A. Anderson, Recording Secretary • Adopted 3 -8 -90 per Resolution No. 90 -1 • VARIANCES A. Applications for variances shall be filed with the member city wherein the property being developed, redeveloped, or retrofitted is located and shall state the exceptional conditions of the property and the peculiar and practical difficulties claimed as a basis for a variance. The applicant shall state in the application letter the reasons for allowing the variance, in accordance with all the requirements set forth in Subsection C below. B. Referral to West Mississippi Watershed Management Commission. All applications for variances shall be referred by the member city to the Commission's Engineer and shall be reviewed by the Commission considering the criteria and standards and the goals of minimizing pollution of public waters. Effective January 1, 1995, all applications for variances referred by a member city to the Commission's Engineer shall be paid for by member cities and/or the party seeking the variance. Costs and expenses incurred by the Commission will be billed directly to the member city (member cities are responsible for collecting fees from the applicant who is seeking a variance). An escrow amount of $2,000 shall be deposited with the Commission by the member city at the time of filing of the original application. The Commission and its staff will advise the member city if costs and expenses are expected to exceed the original deposit filed with the application. Services will not be performed beyond monies on deposit unless the member city has agreed in writing to be responsible for the costs of . those services. The Commission shall set forth such conditions relating to the granting of a variance as they deem necessary to adjust the hardship or special situation so as to carry out the intent and purpose of this policy or shall deny the request and set forth reasons for the denial. C. Issuance of Variances. In considering all requests and in taking subsequent action, the Commission shall make a finding showing that all of the following conditions exist: (1) There are special circumstances or conditions affecting said property such that the strict application of the provisions of these standards and criteria would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. (2) The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the petitioner. (3) The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the other property in the territory in which said property is situated. (4) In applications relating to a use in the floodplain or within the elevations established for a 100 year storm, variances shall not allow a lower degree of flood protection than the flood protection elevation stated in the management standards. (5) The granting of the variance would not be contrary to the intent of taking all reasonable and practical steps to improve water quality within the watershed. -7- Revised 10 -13 -94 • RESOLUTION NO. 94-3 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 90-1 TO INCORPORATE 90-1 EXHIBIT A -VARIANCES, SECTION B WHEREAS, Resolution 90-1 was adopted on March 8, 1990, establishing regulations for non - conforming uses and the granting of variances, and WHEREAS, attached to Resolution 90-1 was Exhibit A which set forth the management standards for new development, redevelopment, and additions to existing development, and established regulations for non - conforming uses and the granting of variances, and WHEREAS, the Commission has not charged a fee to process applications for variances, and over the past four years the Commission has gained experience and realizes the engineering review costs and other associated costs are very expensive to the Commission, and WHEREAS, project review of variance requests since adoption of Resolution 90-1 have ranged from a low of $801 to a high of $6062, and the average cost to perform the engineering services to process a variance is $2465, and • WHEREAS, it is deemed fair and equitable that the persons seeking the variance pay the costs of those reviews, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commisson, as follows: 1. That Exhibit A, Subsection B of the section of Resolution 90 -1 entitled "Variances" shall be amended to read as follows: Variances B. Referral to Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission. All applications for variances shall be referred by the City to the Commission's Engineer and shall be reviewed by the Commission considering the criteria and standards and the goals of minimizing pollution of public waters. All applications for variances referred by a member city to the Commission's Engineer shall be paid for by member cities and /or the party seeking the variance Costs and expenses incurred by the Commission will be billed direct y to the • member city (member cities are responsible for collecting fees from the agplican# who is seeking a variance). An escrow amount of $2,000 shall be deposited with the Commission by the member city at the time of filing of the original application. The Commission and its staff will advise the member city if costs and g=nses are expected to exceed the original deposit filed with the application Services will not be performed beyond monies on deposit unless the member city has agreed in writing to be responsible for the costs of those services, The Commission shall set forth such conditions relating to the granting of a variance as they deem necessary to adjust the hardshiip or special situation so as to carry out the intent and purpose of this policy or shall deny the request and set forth reasons for the denial. 2. This Resolution shall become effective on applications received on January 1, 1995, and thereafter. 3. The Recording Secretary Y Secreta is hereby authorized and directed to send a copy , of this Resolution to each member city's chief administrative officer. Commissioner Gerald Butcher made a motion to adopt the foregoing resolution and Commissioner Mark Hanson seconded the motion. The following voted in favor thereof: Diane Spector, Anne Norris, Butcher, Jodi Polzin, Hanson, David Callister, Fred Moore, and Maria D'Andrea; and the following voted against the motion: none; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 13th day of October, 1994. Fred G. Moore, Chairman Attest: 1 / Judie A. Anderson, Recording Secretary • Adopted 3 -8 -90 per Resolution No. 90 -1 • VARIANCES A. Applications for variances shall be filed with the member city wherein the property being developed, redeveloped, or retrofitted is located and shall state the exceptional conditions of the property and the peculiar and practical difficulties claimed as a basis for a variance. The applicant shall state in the application letter the reasons for allowing the variance, in accordance with all the requirements set forth in Subsection C below. B. Referral to Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission. All applications for variances shall be referred by the member city to the Commission's Engineer and shall be reviewed by the Commission considering the criteria and standards and the goals of minimizing pollution of public waters. Effective January 1, 1995, all applications for variances referred by a member city to the Commission's Engineer shall be paid for by member cities and/or the party seeking the variance. Costs and expenses incurred by the Commission will be billed directly to the member city (member cities are responsible for collecting g fees from the applicant who is seeking variance). An escrow amount of 2 9 ) $ ,000 shall be deposited with the Commission b the member city at the time of filing of the r' Y tY original mal ao lication. Th e Commission and its 9 9 .P staff will advise the member city if costs and expenses are expected to exceed the original deposit filed with the application. Services will not be performed beyond monies on deposit unless the member city has agreed in writing to be responsible for the costs of those services. The Commission shall set forth such conditions relating to the granting of a variance as they deem necessary to adjust the hardship or special situation so as to carry out the intent and purpose of this policy or shall deny the request and set forth reasons for the denial. C. Issuance of Variances. In considering all requests and in taking subsequent action, the Commission shall make a finding showing that all of the following conditions exist: (1) There are special circumstances or conditions affecting said property such that the strict application of the provisions of these standards and criteria would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. (2) The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the petitioner. (3) The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the ublic welfare or injurious P 1 to the other property in the territory in which said property is situated. (4) In applications relating to a use in the floodplain or within the elevations established for a 100 Y ear storm shall variances h I I not allow a lower degree of flood protection than the flood protection elevation stated in the management standards. • (5) The granting of the variance would not be contrary to the intent of taking all reasonable and practical steps to improve water quality within the watershed. -7- Revised 10 -13 -94 Council Meeting Daze 12/19/94 3 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: RESOLUTION AMENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVY ROLL NO. 13132 TO PROVIDE FOR THE AWARD OF ASSESSMENT STABILIZATION GRANTS Department Approval: Diane Spector, Director) of Public Services Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Approve the resolution awarding assessment stabilization grants. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached No ) The attached resolution represents one assessment stabilization grant for Levy No. 13132. No additional grants will be awarded. • �3 • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVY ROLL NO. 13132 TO PROVIDE FOR THE AWARD OF ASSESSMENT STABILIZATION GRANTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed Special Assessment Levy No. 13132 for the following improvements: NORTHWEST AREA STREET IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1994 -11 WHEREAS, Special Assessment Levy No. 13132 was on September 12, 1994 approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted an Assessment Stabilization Program to provide economic assistance to low income property owners in the form of grants to reduce S or pay in full their special assessments for street improvement projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. Certain property owners are eligible for a grant to pay the entire amount of their special assessment. Special Assessment Levy No. 13132 is hereby amended to delete the following assessments: PID # AMOUNT 28- 119 -21 -43 -0030 $1,550 2. All cost i s associated with these grants shall be funded from Local State Aid Account #2900. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk RESOLUTION NO. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • Council Meeting Date 12/19194 City o, f Brooldyn Center Agenda Item Number .3 3 Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ISSUANCE OF TAX - EXEMPT BONDS AND AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR ALLOCATION OF BONDING AUTHORITY Department Approval.-, P PP . G. B# Hoffman, Community Deve pment D' to Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Staff recommends that you pass the resolution. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached --- • Monda y g g PP evening, the Council is being asked to approve an amended resolution authorizing the Dominium Group to apply for additional bonding authority from the state. The resolution would authorize up to an additional $3,000,000. As you will recall, the Dominium Group has a purchase agreement for the Four Courts apartment complex. They are scheduled to close on the project on January 17, 1995. Apparently, they have determined that the rehab costs are going to be greater than previously estimated. I believe this also reflects some change in Dominium's financing plan. Also note the City receives an annual fee of 1/8 of a point on the outstanding principal balance. A representative of Dominium will be on hand Monday to answer any questions you might have. • 1311 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ISSUANCE OF TAX - EXEMPT BONDS AND AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR ALLOCATION OF BONDING AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the City f Brooklyn Center, Minnesota the "City") tY " Y ( tY ) is authorized to issue tax- exempt bonds subject to the annual statewide volume cap on such bonds; and WHEREAS he i i i 7 Multifamily Housing t C has sued is $ 500 000 t� City � Y g Revenue Bonds, Series 1994 (Four Courts Apartments Project) to finance the acquisition and rehabilitation of a qualified residential rental project known as the Four Courts Apartments (the "Project ") located in the City; and WHEREAS, the City has been requested to issue additional special obligation bonds in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding $3,000,000 (the "Bonds ") to finance the additional rehabilitation expenditures at the Project and other related costs; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that: 1. The City Council hereby states its preliminary intention to issue additional tax - exempt bonds in the aggregate principal amount not exceeding $3,000,000 to finance the cost of the Project. 2. The City Manager and authorized officers of the City, together with Holmes & Graven, Chartered, as bond counsel with respect to the Bonds, are hereby authorized to prepare and submit to the State of Minnesota Department of Finance an Application for Allocation of Bonding Authority for Tax Exempt Financing under Federal Tax Law, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474A. 3. That the foregoing preliminary approval of the issuance of Bonds shall be subject to final determination by the City of terms and conditions and shall not constitute an irrevocable commitment on the part of the City to issue the Bonds. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk RESOLUTION NO. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. I Council Meeting Date 12/19/94 3 City o f Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number � 3 Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 94 -257 ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1993 -18, CONTRACT 1994 -Q, RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE REMOVAL (PARK & RIDE /STORM POND SITE) Department Approval: Dia e---Spector, Directa� f Public Services Manager's Review /Recommendation: l No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: A resolution amending Resolution No. 94 -257 which accepted the high bid for purchase of structures and the low bid for demolition of structures and awarded contracts at the November 28,1994 council • meeting is attached for consideration. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached No ) The City Council on November 28, 1994 by Resolution No. 94-257 awarded contracts for the properties within this site. Otting House Movers was awarded a contract for demolition of 4006 65th Avenue North. Otting House Movers made an error on the bid form and placed their bid amount in the space for demolition instead of purchase for moving. Their bid in the amount of $4,500.00 for purchase of 4006 65th Avenue North is amended to the amount of $2,550.00. • /3 i Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 94 -257, ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1993 -18, CONTRACT 1994 -Q, RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE REMOVAL (PARK & RIDE /STORM POND SITE) WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Project No. 1993 -18, bids were received, opened and tabulated by the Director of Public Services on the 27th day of October, 1994; and WHEREAS, the City Council on November 14, 1994, by Resolution No. 94 -237, awarded 4006 65th Avenue North to Otting House Movers, 11640 East 275th Street, Lakeville, MN for demolition. Otting House Movers have claimed that their entry on the bid form was placed on the demolition line and should have been placed on the purchase line in the amount of $2,550.00; and WHEREAS, based upon this information, that it is in the best interest of the City to award 4006 65th Avenue North to Otting House Movers for purchase in the amount of $2,550.00. A. To Semple Building Movers, 1045 Jesse Street, St. Paul, MN for the purchase of the following: 1. 6521 Brooklyn Boulevard $11,299.99 2. 3910 65th Avenue North $ 4,100.00 3. 4010 65th Avenue North $ 8,399.99 4. 4018 65th Avenue North $12,399.99 5. 4024 65th Avenue North $ 8,599.99 6. 4100 65th Avenue North $9,199.99 7. 4106 65th Avenue North $ 8,369.99 B. To Ernst Building Movers Corp., 9400 85th Avenue North, Minneapolis, MN for purchase of the following: 1. 6527 Brooklyn Boulevard $ 850.00 2. 6515 Brooklyn Boulevard $ 5,503.00 RESOLUTION NO. • C. To Otting House Movers, 11640 East 275th Street, Lakeville, MN for purchase of the following: 1. 4012 65th Avenue North $ 9,250.00 2. 4006 65th Avenue North $ 2,550.00 D. To Otting House Movers, 11640 East 275th Street, Lakeville, MN for the demolition of the following: 1. 6501 Brooklyn Boulevard ($4,500.00) E. To Herbst & Sons Construction Co., Inc., 2299 Co. Rd. H2, New Brighton, MN for the demolition of the following: 1. 6505 Brooklyn Boulevard ($5,000.00) 2. 6451 Brooklyn Boulevard ($6,000.00) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into an amended contract with Otting House Movers at their address of business in the name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project No. 1993 -18, Contract 1994 -Q, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed and authorized to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the selected bidder and the next preferable bidder shall be retained until a contract has been executed. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Meeting Date 12119/94 31 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Numbe Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: Licenses Department Approval: b)CL� k- g Sharon Knutson, Deputy City Clerk !7 / _ Manager's Review /Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: Approve attached list of licenses. Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached Yes ) • 31 City of Brooklyn Center ` Licenses to be approved by the City Council on December 19, 1994: COURTESY BENCH U.S. Bench Corporation 3300 Snelling Avenue City Cler ,dtc_ GASOLINE SERVICE STATION Brookdale Unocal 76 5710 Xerxes Ave. N. Brooklyn Center Municipal Garage 6844 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Humboldt Unocal 76 6840 Humboldt Ave. N. Metropolitan Transit Commission 6845 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Mobil 6849 Brooklyn Blvd. U. S. West 6540 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Aj )T";JN United States Post Office 6848 Lee Ave. N. City Clerk 4l.C_ PUBLIC DANCE Holiday Inn 2200 Freeway Blvd. �AJ City Clerk RENTAL DWELLINGS Renewal: Earle Brown Commons 6100 Summit Drive N. Terry L. Hartmann 6804 Fremont Ave. N. Terry L. Hartmann 6809 Fremont Ave. N. Swanson Investments 7230 West River Road Swanson Investments 7250 West River Road Edward Sass 5103 Xerxes Ave. N. Terry L. Hartmann 1323 67th Lane N. Leo Vogel 2841 67th Lane N. Director of Community Development TOBACCO RELATED PRODUCT Applebee's 1347 Brookdale Center Brookdale Unocal 76 5710 Xerxes Ave. N. Brooklyn Center Municipal #1 1500 69th Ave. N. Brooklyn Center Municipal #2 6250 Brooklyn Blvd. Brooklyn Center Municipal #3 1966 57th Ave. N. Brooks Food Market 6804 Humboldt Ave. N. Centerbrook Golf Course 5500 N. Lilac Drive Duoos Bros. American Legion 4307 70th Ave. N. Holiday Inn 2200 Freeway Blvd. Jerry's NewMarket 5801 Xerxes Ave. N. K -Mart 5930 Earle Brown Drive Mobil 6849 Brooklyn Blvd. City Clerk General Approval: Sharon Knutson, Deputy City Clerk Council Meeting Date December 19, 1994 City of Brooklyn Center Agenda Item Number Z� 3 Request For Council Consideration • Item Description: CONSIDERATION OF 1995 LIQUOR LICENSES. Department Approval: Scott Kline, Acting Chief of P Manager's Review/Recommendation: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached Recommended City Council Action: The City ouncil approve the i of liquor licenses for 1995. issuance tY PP Summary Explanation: (supporting documentation attached yes All liquor licenses within the city of Brooklyn Center run concurrent with the calendar year. In the case of intoxicating liquor, clubs, and wine licenses, forms must be forwarded to the State of Minnesota before the renewal date to inform them of the licenses granted by the City. For the convenience of the City Council, a report delineating all police calls for service at liquor establishments for the previous ten months has been included. A complete list of licenses to be renewed for 1995 is also attached. • �� CF�y • :BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICE MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald Splinter, City Manager FROM: Scott Kline, Acting Chief of Police DATE: December 13, 1994 SUBJECT: Annual Liquor License Report The following is a summary of police activity involving those establishments within the city of Brooklyn Center possessing intoxicating liquor license, classes A through F and On -sale Club. The number of calls to these establishments have declined. None of the calls listed • below were related to violations of city ordinances or state statutes which govern the operations of a licensed liquor establishment. The reporting period is January 1, 1994 to October 31, 1994. CLASS A: On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License (80% or greater food) & Sunday The Olive Garden Italian Restaurant - 1601 James Circle North Total calls for service January 1 - October 31, 1994: 22 Breakdown: Alarms 3 Aid & Assist 2 Fire - All Others 1 Lockouts 10 Medicals 1 Motor Vehicle Theft 2 Theft 3 • • Memo to Gerald Splinter 12/13/94 Page 2 Red Lobster Restaurant - 7235 Brooklyn Boulevard Total calls for service January 1 - October 31, 1994: 12 Breakdown: Alarms 1 Aid & Assist 2 Lockouts 2 Miscellaneous Public 2 Parking Violation ' 1 Property Damage Accident 1 Theft 3 CLASS B: On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License (50% to 79% food) & Sunday • A lebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar - 1347 Brook dale Mill Total calls for service January 1 - October 31, 1994: 21 Breakdown: Aid & Assist 10 Assault 2 Drugs 2 Lockouts 1 Miscellaneous Public 1 Theft 5 Chi -Chi's Mexican Restaurant - 2101 Freeway Boulevard Total calls for service January 1 - October 31, 1994: 17 Breakdown: • Alarms 1 Aid & Assist 1 Assault 1 • Memo to Gerald Splinter 12/13/94 Page 3 Fire - All Other 1 Lockouts 1 Miscellaneous Public 4 Property Damage Accident 1 Theft 4 Careless Driving 1 Criminal Sexual Conduct 1 Found Bike 1 NOTE: Chi -Chi's is in the process of transferring the ownership from Chi -Chi's USA, Inc. to Chi - Chi's, Inc. The Ground Round - 2545 County Road 10 Total calls for service January 1 - October 31, 1994: 34 Breakdown: • Alarms 2 Aid & Assist 3 Assault 1 Hit & Run Accidents 2 Lockouts 4 Medicals 2 Miscellaneous Public g Motor Vehicle Theft 2 Property Damage Accident 1 Personal Injury Accident 2 Theft b Vandalism 1 Holidav Inn - 2200 Freeway Boulevard Total calls for service January 1 - October 31, 1994: 82 Breakdowns: Alarms 3 Aid & Assist 12 Memo to Gerald Splinter 12/13/94 Page 4 Assault 3 Disturbing Peace 1 Fire - All Other 1 Hit & Run Accident 1 Lockouts 14 Medicals 5 Miscellaneous Public 23 Motor Vehicle Theft 4 Suspicious Activity 3 Theft 11 Forgery 1 Earle Brown Bowl - 6440 James Circle North Total calls for service January 1 - October 31, 1994: 76 • Breakdown: Aid & Assist 6 Assault 6 Disturbing Peace 1 Hit & Run Accident 2 Lockouts 7 Medicals 11 Miscellaneous Public 22 Motor Vehicle Theft 2 Parking Violation 1 Personal Injury Accident 2 Suspicious Activity 2 Theft 9 Vandalism 4 Driving Violation 1 Lvnbrook Bowl - 6357 North Lilac Drive Total calls for service January 1 - October 31, 1994: 60 Breakdown: • Alarms 1 Aid & Assist 12 Memo to Gerald Splinter 12/13/94 Page 5 • Assault 3 Disturbing Peace 2 Hit & Run Accident 2 Lockouts 5 Medicals 2 Miscellaneous Public 11 Motor Vehicle Theft 2 Motor Vehicle Recovery 1 Property Damage Accident 1 Suspicious Activity 7 Theft 7 Vandalism 6 NOTE: Based on food to liquor ratio Lynbrook Bowl will be changing from a Class C license to a Class B. CLASS F: On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License & Sunday D'Amico's Catering, Inc. - Earle Brown Heritage Center /6155 Earle Brown Drive Total calls for service January 1 - October 31, 1994: 14 Breakdown: Alarms 1 Aid & Assist 2 Assault 1 Lockouts 1 Medicals 2 Miscellaneous Public 3 Suspicious Activity 1 Theft 2 Vandalism 1 On -Sale Club Intoxicating Liquor License Duoos Brothers American Legion Post 630 Total calls for service January 1 - October 31, 1994: 2 Breakdown: Aid & Assist 1 Hit & Run Accident 1 1995 Liquor Licenses CLASS A On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License (80% or greater food) & Sunday General Mills Restaurants, Inc. d/b /a The Olive Garden Italian Restaurant #1253 1601 James Circle North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 General Mills Restaurants, Inc. d/b /a Red Lobster Restaurant #358 7235 Brooklyn Boulevard Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 CLASS B On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License (50 to 79% food) & SundaX Apple American Limited Partnership of Minnesota d/b /a Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar 1347 Brookdale Mall Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Chi- Chi's, Inc. d/b /a Chi -Chi's Mexican Restaurante 2101 Freeway Boulevard Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 GR of MN, Inc. d/b /a The Ground Round 2545 County Road 10 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Larken, Inc. d/b /a Holiday Inn, Brooklyn Center 2200 Freeway Boulevard Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Nelson, Steven John d/b /a Lynbrook Bowl • 6357 North Lilac Drive Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Class B On -Sale Intoxicating -(50% to 79% food) & Sunday - continued: Madden, James E. d/b /a Earle Brown Bowl 6440 James Circle North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Ithaca Restaurant, Inc. d/b /a Pavilion Restaurant /Rookies Bar & Grill 1501 Freeway Boulevard Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Class F & Sunday On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License D'Amico's Catering, Inca d/b /a D'Amico Catering at Earle Brown Heritage Center 6155 Earle Brown Drive Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 On -Sale Club Intoxicating Liquor License Duoos Bros. American Legion, Post 630 4307 70th Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 On -Sale Wine License Dayton's Iron Horse Liquors, Inc. d/b /a Dayton's Brookdale Inn 1100 Brookdale Center Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Denny's, Inc. d/b /a Denny's Restaurant #1284 3901 Lakebreeze Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 On -Sale Non - Intoxicating Liquor License 50's Grill 5524 Brooklyn Boulevard Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 (On -Sale Non - Intoxicating Liquor Licenses - continued) Beacon Bowl 6525 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Chuckwagon Grill 1928 57th Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 City of Brooklyn Center Centerbrook Golf Course & Central Park 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Davanni's, Inc d/b /a Davanni's Pizza and Hot Hoagies 5937 Summit Drive Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Dayton's Iron Horse Liquors, Inc d/b /a Dayton's Brookdale Inn 1100 Brookdale Center Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Denny's Inc. d/b /a Denny's Restaurant #1284 3901 Lakebreeze Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Little Brooklyn Restaurant 6219 Brooklyn Boulevard Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Pizza Huts of the Northwest, Inc. d/b /a Pizza Hut #426005 6002 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 f In Scoreboard Pizza, Inc. d/b /a Scoreboard Pizza 6816 Humboldt Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Off -Sale Non -Intoxi cating Malt Liquor License Birch Bru, Inc. d/b /a Su P erAmerica #4160 6545 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Birch Bru, Inc. d/b /a SuperAmerica #4058 1901 - 57th Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 i Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. d/b /a The Country Store 3600 - 63rd Avenue North • Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. d/b /a Jerry's New Market - Brookdale 5801 Xerxes Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 I • COMBINED BUDGET SUMMARY GENERAL FUND � DEBT RETIREMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HOUSING &REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 's CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA COMBINED ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET INCLUDING THE GENERAL FUND - DEBT RETIREMENT FUNDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) FUND AND HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT (HRA) FUND 1995 PROPOSED SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE AND FUND 1994 1995 1995 Percent Budgeted Revenue Increase Increase REVENUE BY SOURCE: Revenue Estimate - Decrease - Decrease I. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES 5,740,195 6,308,325 568,130 9.90% 11. LODGING SALES TAX 360,000 395,000 35,000 9.72% 111. BUSINESS LICENSES & PERMITS 159,600 155,600 -4,000 -2.51% IV. NON -BUS. LICENSES & PERMITS 129,700 140,800 11,100 8.56% V. INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 3,699,763 3,787,747 87,984 2.38% VI. GENERAL GOVT. SERVICE CHARGE 35,100 32,500 -2,600 -7.41% VII. PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICE CHARGES 22,100 18,100 -4,000 - 18.10% VIII. RECREATION FEES 879,713 843,132 - 36,581 -4.16% IX. FINES AND FORFEITURES 144,000 112,000 - 32,000 - 22.22% X. MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 299,000 286,000 - 13,000 -4.35% XI. TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 100,000 100,000 0 0.00% - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUE BY SOURCE 11,569,171 12,179,204 610,033 5.27% 1994 1995 1995 Percent Budgeted Revenue Increase Increase REVENUE BY FUND: Revenue Estimate - Decrease - Decrease I. GENERAL FUND 10,913,445 11,457,923 544,478 4.99% II. DEPT REDEMPTION FUNDS 0 72,116 72,116 III. EDA SPECIAL OPERATING FUND 516,366 512 -4,175 -0.81% IV. HRA SPECIAL OPERATING FUND 139,360 136,974 -2,386 -1.71% -------- - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUE BY FUND 11,569,171 12,179,204 610,033 5.27% 12/16/94 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA COMBINED ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET INCLUDING THE GENERAL FUND DEBT RETIREMENT FUNDS - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL OPERATING FUND 1995 PROPOSED RESUME OF REVENUE AND ESTIMATED REVENUE II 'I 1995 1995 % 1993 1994 1995 Increase Increase i Actual Budgeted Estimated - Decrease - Decrease Revenue Revenue Revenue From 1994 From 1994 I. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES General Fund Levy 4,629,537 5,489,414 5,981,165 491,751 8.96% Debt Retirement Levy 220,998 72,116 72,116 EDA Special Levy 140,750 129,256 136,374 7,118 5.51% HRA Special Levy 121,682 121,525 118,670 -2,855 -2.350 ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - -- Total Property Taxes 5,112,967 5,740,195 6,308,325 568,130 9.90% I - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - -- II. LODGING TAXES 376,146 360,000 395,000 35,000 9.720 III. BUS LICENSES & PERMITS 136,210 159,600 155,600 -4,000 -2.51% IV. NONBUS LIC & PERMITS 164,269 129,700 140,800 11,100 8.56% V. INTERGOVERNMENTAL REV. General Fund 3,242,212 3,409,818 3,479,626 69,808 2.05% EDA Special Levy 34,792 36,483 36,483 0 0.00% ' HRA Special Levy 16,304 17,835 18,304 469 2.63% Debt Retirement Fund 58,410 0 0 0 Comm Dev Block Grant 240,781 235,627 253,334 17,707 7.51% - - - - -- - - - - -- Total Intergovmt. Rev. 3,592,499 3,699,763 3,787,747 87,984 2.38% ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --- ------ -- - - - - -- - - - - -- VI. GEN. GOVT. CHARGES 37,968 35,100 32,500 -2,600 -7.41% VII. PUBLIC SAFETY CHARGES 16,861 22,100 18,100 -4,000 - 18,100 VIII RECREATION FEES 784,056 879,713 843,132 - 36,581 -4.16% IX. FINES & FORFEITURES 140,104 144,000 112,000 - 32,000 - 22.22% X. MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE Sale of Certificates 120,000 0 0 0 Other Revenue General 279,212 184,000 200,000 16,000 8.70 EDA 113,750 115,000 86,000 - 29,000 - 25.22% Debt Retirement 16,628 0 0 0 ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - -- Total Miscl. Revenue 529,590 299,000 286,000 - 13,000 -4.35% ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - -- XI. TRANSFERS -OTHER FUNDS To General 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0.00% Total Transfers -Other 100,000 100,000 100,000 -- - - - - - 0 0.00% ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - - - -- TOTAL REVENUE & TRANSFERS 10,990,670 11,569,171 12,179,204 610,033 5.27% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 10,026,575 10,913,445 11,457,923 544,478 4.99% TOTAL DEBT RETIREMENT FUND 296,036 0 72,116 72,116 TOTAL EDA SP. OPER. FUND 530,073 516,366 512,191 -4,175 -0.81% TOTAL HRA SP. OPER. FUND 137,986 139,360 136,974 -2,386 -1.71% - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - -- TOTAL BY FUND 10,990,670 11,569,171 12,179,204 610,033 5.270 12/16/94 { CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA COMBINED ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET INCLUDING THE GENERAL FUND - DEBT RETIREMENT FUNDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FUND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT FUND 1995 PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES 1993 1994 1995 1995 1995% Actual Adopted Proposed Increase Increase Expend- Approp- Approp- - Decrease - Decrease itures nations nations From 1994 From 1994 I. GENERAL FUND BY FUNCTION AND ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT A. General Government 1,560,674 1,741,423 1,867,119 125,696 7.22% B. Public Safety 3,870,563 4,703,657 4,857,414 153,757 3.27% C. Public Works 1,756,187 1,624,036 1,545,047 - 78,989 - 4.86% D. Health & Social Services 41,325 41,572 40,860 -712 -1.71% E. Recreation 1,999,270 2,152,382 2,329,382 177,000 8.22% F. Economic Development 178,703 171,000 187,625 16,625 9.72% G. Unallocated Expenses 300,803 479,375 630,476 151,101 31.52% Total General Fund 9,707,525 10,913,445 11,457,923 544,478 4.99% 11. DEBT SERVICE FUNDS BY FUND A. 1991 Cert. of Indebtedness Redemption Fund 73,000 0 0 0 B. 1992 Cert. of Indebtedness Redemption Fund 185,200 0 0 0 C. 1993 Cert. of Indebtedness Redemption Fund 49,600 0 0 0 D. 1994 Street Improvement Bond Redemption Fund 0 0 72,116 72,116 ---- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Total Debt Redemption 307,800 0 72,116 72,116 IIL E.D.A. & H.R.A. FUNDS Economic Development 1,101,965 655,726 649,165 -6,561 - 1.00% -- ------- ---- ------ - - - - -- ------ --- - -- - - - - - ----- --- - - - - -- Total E.D.A. 1,101,965 655,726 649,165' -6,561 -1.00% --- - -- --- - - - - -- TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES 11,117,290 11,569,171 12,179,204 610,033 5.27% 12/16/94 t CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA COMBINED ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR ALL BUDGETED CITY FUNDS INCLUDING THE GENERAL FUND - DEBT RETIREMENT FUNDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FUND - HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT FUND 1995 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS BY OBJECT CLASSIFICATION 1995 1995 % 1994 1995 1995% Increase Increase Adopted Proposed of - Decrease - Decrease Object Classification Amount Amount Total From 94 From 94 ---------------------- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- Personal Services Salaries & Wages 5,720,554 5,941,823 48.79% 221,269 3.87% Pensions 771,622 802,879 6.59% 31,257 4.05% Health Life Disab Dental Ins 462,488 513,887 4.22% 51,399 11.11% Workers Compensation Ins. 155,592 161,822 1.33% 6,230 4.00% Personal Services Reimbursed - 539,289 - 541,485 -4.45 -2,196 0.41% - Total Personal Services 6,570,967 6,878,926 56.480 307,959 4.69% --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - 26,192 -4.730 % Supplies 553,261 527,069 4.33% Professional Services 558,967 568,061 4.660 9,094 1.63% Communications 197,535 208,702 1.71% 11,167 5.65% Repair, Rental, & Maintenance 498,894 480,235 3.94% - 18,659 -3.74% Other Contractual Services 633,673 768,547 6.31% 134,874 21.28% Central Garage Rentals 888,069 862,283 7.080 - 25,786 -2.90% Insurance 115,900 145,000 1.19% 29,100 25.11 Utilities 451,128 455,110 3.74% 3,982 0.88% Merchandise for Resale 44,000 45,500 0.37% 1,500 3.41% Contingency 180,620 170,000 1.40% - 10,620 -5.88% ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- Total Operating Budget 10,693,014 11,109,433 91.22% 416,419 3.89% ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- Capital Outlay 220,431 348,490 2.86% 128,059 58.09% --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- Debt Redemption 0 72,116 0.59% 72,116 --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- Economic Development Authority 516,366 512,191 4.21% -4,175 -0.81% Housing & Redevelopment Auth. 139,360 136,974 1.120 -2,386 -1.71% --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- Total Appropriations 11,569,171 12,179,204 100.00% 610,033 5.27% • GENERAL FUND ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS � SUMMARIES 1 fo�dard \genfdrev CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA Y ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET GENERAL FUND 1995 PROPOSED RESUME OF REVENUE AND ESTIMATED REVENUE 1995 1995 1995% 1992 1993 1994 Esti- Increase Increase Acct. Actual Actual Budgeted mated - Decrease Decrease No. Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue From 94 From 94 I. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES Ad Valorem Levy 3011 3,893,785 4,636,996 5,601,443 6,166,149 564,706 10.080 Estimated 2% Uncollectable - 112,029 - 184,984 - 72,956 65.12% Penalties and Interest 3013 1,039 -7,459 0 0 0 Special Assessments 3081 1,539 1,027 0 0 0 - - - - -- --- - -- - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - - - -- Total 3,896,363 4,630,564 5,489,414 5,981,165 491,751 8.96% --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- -- - - -- II. LODGING TAXES 3021 394,960 376,146 360,000 395,000 35,000 9.720 --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - - - -- III. BUSINESS LICENSES AND PERMITS Liquor Licenses 3111 104,569 98,617 107,300 107,300 0 0.00% Beer Licenses 3112 5,467 5,460 5,400 5,400 0 0.00% Garbage Licenses 3113 2,156 2,005 2,100 2,000 -100 -4.76% Taxicab Licenses 3114 400 540 400 500 100 25.00% Mechanical Licenses 3115 3,482 3,435 3,400 4,000 600 17.65% Food Hand Licenses 3118 18,321 0 0 0 0 Service Station Lics. 3119 1,365 2,326 1,700 1,700 0 0.00 Motor Vehicle Dealers 3120 900 950 1,000 1,000 0 0.00% Bowling Alley Licenses 3121 700 708 700 700 0 0.00% Miscl. Business Lics. 3124 1,796 1,795 1,000 1,600 600 60.00% Cigarette Licenses 3126 1,115 1,055 1,000 1,300 300 30.00% Swimming Pool Licenses 3127 2,415 -45 0 0 0 Sign Permits 3128 2,003 3,177 2,000 2,000 0 0.00% Rental Dwell. Licenses 3129 18,084 11,089 28,000 20,000 -8,000 - 28.57% Lodging Est. Licenses 3130 138 0 0 0 0 Amusement Licenses 3132 5,583 5,098 5,600 8,100 2,500 44.64% - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- Total 168,494 136,210 159,600 155,600 -4,000 -2.510 - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- IV. NONBUSINESS LICENSES AND PERMITS Dog Lics. & Pound Fees 3150 5,724 4,746 5,700 4,800 -900 - 15,790 Building Permits 3151 114,482 111,262 95,000 100,000 5,000 5.26% Mechanical Permits 3152 27,861 31,905 20,000 25,000 5,000 25.00% Sewage & Water Permits 3153 3,041 620 1,000 1,000 0 0.00% Plumbing Permits 3154 12,549 15,701 8,000 10,000 2,000 25.00% Electrical Permits 3157 34 35 0 0 0 - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - --- - - - - - -- - - - - -- Total 163,691 164,269 129,700 140,800 11,100 8.56% - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- 12/16/94 1995 1995 1995% 1994 Esti- Increase Increase Acct. 1992 1993 Budgeted mated - Decrease Decrease No. Actual Actual Revenue Revenue From 94 From 94 V. INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE Fed. Civil Def. Reimb. 3212 7,560 14,495 6,000 6,000 0 0.00% State Energy Cons.Grnt. 3248 4,940 0 0 0 0 State Police Drug Asst 3242 18,673 11,348 0 0 0 State Police Training 3247 6,922 11,415 10,000 10,000 0 0.00% State Local Govt. Aid 3250 1,787,378 1,697,803 1,757,227 1,799,076 41,849 2.38% State Aid Street Maint 3251 75,000 75,000 90,000 90,000 0 0.00% State Pol. Pension Aid 3252 198,632 205,637 195,988 210,440 14,452 7.37% State Fire Pension Aid 3254 69,110 64,039 70,000 64,000 -6,000 -8.57% State Homestead Credit 3255 1,033,058 1,162,475 1,280,603 1,300,110 19,507 1.52% Grants from Other Govts 3270 7,222 0 0 --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - - - -- Total 3,208,495 3,242,212 3,409,818 3,479,626 69,808 2.05% VI. GENERAL GOVERNMENT CHARGES Plan. Comm. Appls. 3310 2,000 7,300 5,600 5,000 -600 - 10.71% Zoning & Sp. Use Prmts. 3311 1,475 2,885 1,500 2,100 600 40.00% Reinspection Fee (HM) 3312 0 0 1,500 0 -1,500 100.00% Metro Sec. 8 Inspcts. 3317 15,864 13,344 14,000 13,500 -500 -3.57% Sale of Maps &Documents 3321 835 738 1,000 1,000 0 0.00% Sale of Plans & Specs 3323 2,812 1,250 3,000 3,000 0 100.00% Filing Fees 3324 50 0 50 0 -50 - 100.00% Legal Fees & Reimburse 3326 2,259 0 1,000 0 -1,000 - 100.00% IDR Bond Admin Fee 3328 0 4,000 0 0 0 Weed Cutting Charges 3330 1,771 1,432 2,000 1,500 -500 - 25.00% Abatement Fees 3331 1,890 1,215 1,200 1,200 0 0.00% Assessment Searches 3332 3,720 451 0 0 0 Research Charges 3334 258 808 500 500 0 0.00% Final Plat Fee 3335 0 750 500 500 0 0.00% Tree Disposal Fee 3336 0 0 750 750 0 0.00% Shade Tree Admin. 3338 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 0 0.00% Tree Registrations 3339 0 500 500 500 0 0.00% Blvd Tree Plant Fee 3340 0 1,295 0 950 950 - - - - - -- - -- - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- Total 34,934 37,968 35,100 32,500 -2,600 -7.41% VII. PUBLIC SAFETY CHARGES Fire Alarm Fees 3341 3,300 150 3,600 600 -3,000 - 83.33% Burglar Alarm Fees 3342 8,600 6,300 10,000 7,200 -2,800 - 28.00% Towing Charges 3344 1,032 803 1,000 1,000 0 0.00% Accident Reports 3346 4,580 4,422 4,500 4,500 0 0.00% License Investigations 3347 2,795 1,910 1,000 1,800 800 80.00% Private Security 3348 5,362 3,276 2,000 3,000 1,000 50.00% - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- Total 25,669 16,861 22,100 18,100 -4,000 - 18.10% - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - --- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- 12/16/94 1995 1995 9 1 95% I 1994 Esti- Increase Increase Acct. 1992 1993 Budgeted mated - Decrease Decrease No. Actual Actual Revenue Revenue From 94 From 94 VIII. RECREATION FEES Adult Programs 3361 326,793 318,459 346,005 326,244 - 19,761 -5.71% Teen Programs 3362 13,360 15,125 13,580 13,900 320 2.36% Children' Programs 3363 64,807 68,963 68,132 72,612 4,480 6.58% General Programs 3364 30,927 17,696 31,496 26,176 -5,320 - 16.89% Comm. Center Programs 3367 298,386 363,813 420,500 404,200 - 16,300 -3.88% Total 734,273 784,056 879,713 843,132 - 36,581 -4.16% - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - --- -- - - -- IX. FINES & FORFEITURE 3450 148,701 140,104 144,000 112,000 - 32,000 - 22.22% - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- X. MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE Interest 3800 262,347 249,688 170,000 186,000 16,000 9.41% Other Revenue 3461 10,166 6,191 8,000 8,000 0 0.00% Refunds & Reimburs. 3462 676 397 6,000 6,000 0 0.00% Sale of Property 3467 4,449 13 0 0 0 Contributions 3468 2,500 860 0 0 0 Cash Over or (Short) 3471 243 777 0 0 0 Check Process Fees 3472 80 80 0 0 0 Unclaimed Evidence 3478 13 216 0 0 0 Forfeited Drug Money 3479 21,297 20,990 0 0 0 Sale of Cert. Of Indeb. 3955 480,000 120,000 0 0 0 - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- Total 781,771 399,212 184,000 200,000 16,000 8.70% XI. TRANSFERS FROM OTHER CITY FUNDS Liquor Stores - Earnings 3951 65,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0.00% - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- Total 65,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0.00% - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - -- TOTAL GENERAL FUND 9,622,351 10,027,602 10,913,445 11,457,923 544,478 4.99% I 12/16/94 i forwarftensumry CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET GENERALFUND 1995 PROPOSED BUDGET SUMMARY OF APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES 1992 1993 1994 1995 1995 1995% Actual Actual Adopted Recommend Increase Increase Unit Expend- Expend- Approp- Approp- - Decrease - Decrease Num. itures itures nations riations From 1994 From 1994 A. GENERAL GOVERNMENT Council 111 78,476 76,772 85,688 124,550 38,862 45.35% Commissions 112 3,113 916 9,500 9,500 0 0.00% City Mgr's Office 113 313,417 271,213 320,365 351,631 31,266 9.76% Elections 114 44,181 22,966 49,136 37,162 - 11,974 - 24.37% Assessing 115 183,765 190,195 208,382 206,728 -1,654 -0.79% Finance 116 149,624 146,324 158,263 168,007 9,744 6.16% Independent Audit 117 16,450 17,500 18,000 18,400 400 2.22% Legal Counsel 118 202,220 185,216 204,196 204,700 504 0.25% Government Buildings 119 465,670 329,577 336,751 341,125 4,374 1.30% Data Processing 120 340,979 319,995 351,142 405,316 54,174 15.43% --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Total General Govt 1,797,895 1,560,674 1,741,423 1,867,119 125,696 7.22% --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- B. PUBLIC SAFETY Police Protection 131 3,183,079 3,206,393 3,838,692 3,982,914 144,222 3.76% Fire Protection 132 417,963 365,876 508,263 512,242 3,979 0.78% Community Development 133 308,628 264,523 310,559 324,723 14,164 4.56% Emerg Preparedness 134 29,250 33,771 46,143 37,535 -8,608 - 18.66% --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Total Public Safety 3,938,920 3,870,563 4,703,657 4,857,414 153,757 3.27% --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- C. PUBLIC WORKS Engineering 141 222,245 334,000 310,920 364,762 53,842 17.32% Street Maintenance 142 905,646 994,414 1,313,116 1,180,285 - 132,831 - 10.12% Vehicle Maintenance 143 466,299 427,773 0 0 0 --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Total Public Works 1,594,190 1,756,187 1,624,036 1,545,047 - 78,989 -4.86% --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- D. HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES Health 151 84,069 0 0 0 0 Social Services 152 30,510 41,325 41,572 40,860 -712 -1.71% --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Total Health & Soc. Svcs. 114,579 41,325 41,572 40,860 -712 -1.71% --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- 12/16/94 a a 1992 1993 1994 1995 1995 1995% Actual Actual Adopted Recommend Increase Increase Unit Expend- Expend- Approp- Approp- - Decrease - Decrease Num. itures itures riations nations From 1994 From 1994 E. RECREATION Administration 160 311,713 307,035 346,805 231,927 - 114,878 - 33.12% Adult Programs 161 275,694 306,939 296,392 339,509 43,117 14.55% Teen Programs 162 12,878 14,210 13,772 15,483 1,711 12.42% Children's Programs 163 82,832 85,249 88,154 117,996 29,842 33.85% General Programs 164 89,299 79,869 91,601 95,066 3,465 3.78% Community Center 167 507,159 644,769 637,430 698,654 61,224 9.60% Parks Maintenance 169 504,236 561,199 678,228 830,747 152,519 22.49% --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Total Recreation 1,783,811 1,999,270 2,152,382 2,329,382 177,000 8.22% --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- F. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Convention & Tourism 170 187,606 178,703 171,000 187,625 16,625 9.72% --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Total Economic Dev. 187,606 178,703 171,000 187,625 16,625 9.72% - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- G. UNALLOCATED EXPENSES Un. Dept. Expenses 180 273,153 300,597 301,250 351,236 49,986 16.59% Personal Services 181 120 206 0 109,240 109,240 Contingency 182 - -- - -- - - 0 - -- --- - - - - - 0 178,125 170,000 -8,125 -4.56% --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Total Unall. Expenses 273,273 300,803 479,375 630,476 151,101 31.52% --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- TOTAL GENERAL FUND 9,690,274 9,707,525 10,913,445 11,457,923 544,478 4.99% 12/16/94 s HOUSING &REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS SUMMARIES HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1995 Budget POLICIES: + Collect and distribute tax revenues in an efficient and responsible manner. + Estimate property tax revenue by an objective conservative analytical process. The purpose of this budget is to provide a source of funding for the Economic Development Authority Special Operating fund's activities. All revenues collected by the H.R.A. are transfered to the E.D.A. Special Operating Fund when collected. Actual Actual Adopted Department Manager Budget 1992 1993 1994 Requested Recommend REVENUES: Property taxes $128,362 $121,682 $124,005 $122,340 $122,340 Less: 3% Uncollectabie ($2,480) ($3,670) ($3,670) Net Property Taxes $128,362 $121,682 $121,525 $118,670 $118,670 Homestead Credit Revenue 14,497 16,304 17,835 18,304 18,304 Total $142,859 $137,986 $139,360 $136,974 $136,974 EXPENDITURES: Transfer to E.D.A. Fund $142,859 $137,986 $139,360 $136,974 $136,974 Total $142,859 $137,986 $139,360 $136,974 $136,974 COMMENTS: Based on 1994 tax collections, we estimate that 3% of the current year tax levy will be delinquent. Therefore, the provision for uncollected property taxes increased from 2% to 3% for 1995. " ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL OPERATING FUND 1995 Budget POLICIES: + To preserve the vitality of the City's neighborhoods and maintain a high level of resident satisfaction with the City's housing and related services and to maximize the quality of the City's existing housing stock through programs of selected redevelopment and rehabilitation. + To encourage the continual updating and redevelopment of the City's commercial areas to keep them attractive and competitive and encourage the location of new businesses. + To encourage the preservation and expansion of the City's industrial base. PURPOSE The purpose of the Economic Development Authority is to preserve and improve the City's neighborhoods so that there continues to be a high level of resident satisfaction with City neighborhoods and housing. Additionally, the EDA will work to undertake such programs and policies that will assist in the development of the City's industrial commercial and retail businesses to maintain the City's regional position with regard to these businesses. ACTIVITIES: Percent of Budoet STAFFING: Administration 17% 1.00 Community Develop. Director Redevelopment 41% 1.00 Community Devel . , �Y p Specialist Rehab of Private Property 23,b 0.60 E.D.A. Secretary Special Studies/Projects 8% 0.05 Building Inspector Apartment Operations 11% 0.05 Community Develop. Recept. 100% 2.70 Full -time Equivalents Actual Actual Adopted Department Manager Budget 1992 1993 1994 Requested Recommend REVENUES: Property Taxes - E.D.A. Levy $0 $140,751 $131,894 $140,592 $140,592 Less: 3% Uncollectible 0 0 (2,638) (4,218) (4,218) Net Property Taxes $0 $140,751 $129,256 $136,374 $136,374 Homestead Credit 0 34,792 36,483 36,483 36,483 Transfer from H.R.A. Fund 142,859 137,986 139,360 136,974 136,974 Investment Earnings 125,917 86,965 100,000 62,500 62,500 C.D.B.G.Revenue 251,747 240,781 235,627 253,334 253,334 Apartment Rent 5,010 26,785 15,000 23,500 23,500 Other 11,558 0 0 0 0 Total $537,091 $668,060 - -$655,726 $649,165 $649,165 EXPENDITURES: Personnel $100,211 $152,008 $152,026 $152,542 $152,542 Supplies 754 829 1,600 2,300 2,300 Legal & Professional 71,669 119,485 70,500 77,850 77,850 Repairs & Maintenance 112,086 74,552 141,800 143,017 143,017 Contractual Services 22,557 67,003 29,610 53,940 53,940 Vehicle Services 0 0 2,000 3,405 3,405 Taxes 2,363 59,977 16,150 28,700 28,700 Capital Outlay 166,167 606,531 208,765 131,327 131,327 Relocation Assistance 0 6,500 0 24,000 24,000 Other 2,821 15,080 33,275 32,084 32,084 Total $478,628 $1, 101,965 $655,726 $649,165 $649,165 Staffing (FTE) 1.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 1 DEPARTMENT: E.D.A. ACTMTY: Administration Activity Description General management of housing and economic development activities including the following: 1. General housing and economic development information resource for City Council, public inquiries, and other governmental agencies. 2. Staffing for special projects including Minnesota City Participation Program (MCPP) first -time home buyer program, Realtors Day, and Five City Remodeling Fair. 3. Staff time allocated to advisory commissions and task forces, Chamber committees and professional organizations. 4. Preparation of grants for special funding from state and federal agencies and preparation of special legislation for Minnesota State Legislature. Percent of Total Budget: 17% 1995 Objectives 1) Continue Minnesota City Participation Program with a goal of 30-35 first -time home buyer mortgages. 2) Work with City advisory commissions and task forces on various projects. 3) Work with homeowners and potential homeowners to provide access to loans to purchase properties and loans to rehabilitate properties. 4) Continue economic development activity, including business expansion activities. Recommended 1995 Budget Revenues Property Tax - E.D.A. Levy $59,915 Property Tax - H.R.A. Levy 47,477 Total $107,392 Expenditures Staff Allocation Personnel $47,577 Community Develop. Director 0.30 Supplies 600 Community Develop. Specialist 0.35 Legal & Professional 12,000 E.D.A Secretary 0.19 Communications 3,900 Total 0.84 Repair & Maintenance 500 Contractual Services 17,940 Vehicle Services 3,405 Insurance 6,000 Capital Outlay 800 Contigency 14,670 Total $107,392 Comments: This program provides a variety of housing and economic development activities generally not linked to specific projects. This is the E.D.A program that provides the greatest amount of public contact in a variety of capacities, including information resource and referral, special mortgage or housing rehabilitation programs and City housing policy information. t DEPARTMENT: E.D.A. ACTMTY: Redevelopment Activity Description The EDA's scattered site redevelopment program focuses on acquisition and demolition of blighted single- family and mufti - family properties in the City. The goals of the program are removal of blighting influences on City neighborhoods and redevelopment of the properties. The non - personnel portion of this activity reflects costs related directly to the EDA's scattered site redevelopment program. In addition to the scattered site acquisition program, which is funded exclusively by the EDA/HRA levies, the personnel costs reflect anticipated staff time to be committed to future redevelopment projects funded with revenue sources outside the EDA/HRA levies, with financing tools such as tax increment financing, essential function bonds and state grants. Separate project budgets will be developed for these activities as they proceed. These projects include the Willow Lane area and 69th and Brooklyn Boulevard area. Percent of Total Budget: 41% 1995 Objectives 1) Voluntary acquisition of 3 blighted single - family properties. 2) Redevelopment of 3-6 single- family lots with new single -family construction. 3) Continue to reimburse Economic Development Authority special operating fund for acquisition and demolition of Humboldt Avenue apartments (6715, 6717, 6719 and 6721 Humboldt Avenue North) from multi -year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) scattered site project. 4) Develop Willow Lane and the 69th Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard redevelopment projects. 5) Continue to work with mufti- family property owners and potential buyers of these properties to facilitate rehabilitation of these properties. Recommended 1995 Budget Revenues Property Tax - E.D.A. Levy $62,695 Property Tax - H.R.A. Levy 49,680 Investment Earnings 62,500 C.D.B.G. Revenue 95,000 Total $269,875 Expenditures Staff Allocation Personnel $96,848 Com. Dev. Director 0.70 Supplies 500 Com. Dev. Specialist 0.60 Legal & Professional 13,000 EDA Secretary 0.40 Communications 500 Total 1.70 Repair and Maintenance 800 Contractual Services 24,000 Taxes 3,700 Capital Outlay 130,527 Total $269,875 Comments: The majority of staff time for the Community Development Director, Community Development Specialist and EDA Secretary will be spent on this activity in 1995. The Community Development Specialist and Community Development Secretary will be the staff primarily responsible for the scattered site redevelopment program. Staff tasks for the scattered site program include: • Property acquisition. • Management of asbestos abatement projects, when needed. • Management of demolition. • Redevelopment of lots. DEPARTMENT: E.D.A. ACTIVITY: Rehab of Private Property Activity Description This activity is the EDA's housing rehabilitation deferred loan program which provides up to $15,000 in deferred loans to income - qualified applicants for rehabilitation of single- family and duplex properties in the City. The deferred loan program is funded exclusively with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. Percent of Total Budget: 23% 1995 Objectives 1) The 1995 deferred loan program plans to provide rehabilitation for 10 -12 single - family homes in the City. Recommended 1995 Budget Revenues C.D.B.G. Revenues $149,334 Total $149,334 Expenditures Staff Allocation Personnel $8117 Com. ev. D . Specialist p 0.05 Building Repairs 141,217 EDA Secretary 0.01 Total $149,334 Building Inspector 0.05 Community Development Recept 0.05 Total 0.16 Comments: This program has been in place since the mid- 1970's and provides comprehensive rehabilitation to eligible properties of income- eligible applicants whose incomes are at 60% or below the median household income established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Applicants incomes are verified for eligibility by the Hennepin County of Planning and Development staff on a fee basis. City Community Development staff provide the remainder of staff support to the program, including initial inspections, development of project specifications, preconstruction and final inspections. DEPARTMENT: E.D.A. ACTIVITY: Special Studies /Projects Activity Description This program activity provides for special projects undertaken by the EDA which are outside the standard development/redevelopment activities of the EDA. The 1995 projects included in this project are: 1) Household Outside Maintenance for the Elderly H( OME) This is a program that provides minor home repair for persons 60 years of age and over or who are permanently disabled. 2) Business retention study This program is a joint city project which proposes to promote business expansion /retention and provide job opportunities. Percent of Total Budget: 8% 1995 Objectives 1) The HOME program proposes to complete between 30 -40 projects this Y ear. 2) The business retention study proposes to complete the initial phase of the study with this funding. Recommended 1995 Budget Revenues Property Tax - E.D.A. Levy $22,316 Property Tax - H.R.A. Levy 17,684 C.D.B.G. Revenues 9,000 Total $49,000 Expenditures Professional Services 49,000 Total $49,000 Comments: The special studies are those activities that are accomplished through contractual agreements with outside organizations. The business retention study is being undertaken by Community Resource Partnership on a multi - city basis, while the HOME program is operated by Senior Community Services, a nonprofit corporation which provides minor home repair services to persons 60 years of age or older or permanently disabled persons. DEPARTMENT: E.D.A. ACTIVITY: Apartment Operations Activity Description Apartment operations reflect the cost of maintaining the EDA rental properties. The funds budgeted for this activity reflect the utility, maintenance and tax costs. Funds are allocated for relocation of the remaining tenants at the fourplex located at 6637 Humboldt Avenue North. Percent of Total Budget: 11% 1995 Objectives 1) Provide relocation assistance to tenants at 6637 Humboldt Avenue North to completely vacate the building by April 1995. 2) Develop recommendations for the reuse of the building located on Humboldt Avenue North. 3) To respond to tenant concerns, if any, in a timely manner. Recommended 1995 Budget Revenues Apartment Rent $23,500 Property Tax - E.D.A. Levy 27,931 Property Tax - H. R.A. Levy 22,133 Total $73,564 Expenditures Supplies $1,200 Professional Services 3,450 Legal Services 400 Repair and Maintenance 500 Contractual Services 12,000 Taxes 25,000 Property Insurance 150 Relocation Assistance 24,000 Utilities 6,125 Contingency 739 Total $73,564 Comments: Presently, only two units of the fourplex at 6637 Humboldt Avenue North are occupied. The vacancies are by intent, and ultimately the EDA desires to vacate all the units. Since only two units in the building are occupied, the rents do not provide enough cash flow for the building costs. The current residents are likely to remain for the foreseeable future and will be allowed to do so unless their actions warrant eviction or the EDA provides them with relocation assistance. The alternatives are to either continue for some indefinite time with a negative cash flow or to provide relocation assistance to the two remaining tenants. Staff is recommending the option of providing relocation assistance and vacating the building completely. • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1995 Budget Detail of Capital Outlay v Total Manager Description Unit/Cost Requested Recommended 1. Land /Building Acquisitions $130,527 $130,527 2. Cellular Phones 2 @ 400 800 800 Total Capital Outlay. $131,327 $131,327 • � SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS SUMMARIES • • DISEASED TREE REMOVAL FUND 1995 Budget POLICIES: + Enforce state statutes and City ordinances regarding the timely removal of diseased trees. + Continue the policy where the City contributes one -half of the cost to remove diseased trees from boulevards. Actual Actual Estimated Manager Budget 1992 1993 1994 Recommend REVENUES: Special Assessments $17,650 $17,461 $17,000 $17,000 Tree Removal Charges 18,770 11,483 12,000 12,000 Investment Earnings 1,205 1,838 1,000 1,000 Total $37,625 $30,782 $30,000 $30,000 EXPENDITURES: Personal Services $1,600 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 Contractual Services 27,522 21,398 28,000 28,000 Total $29,122 $23,398 $30,000 $30,000 Comments: The City's share of the cost of boulevard tree removal, and the full cost of park tree removal, is budgeted through the Forestry activity of the Park Maintenance Division budget. EARLE BROWN TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT FUND 1995 Budget POLICIES: + Collect and distribute tax revenues in an efficient and responsible manner. + Estimate property tax revenue by an objective conservative analytical process. The purpose of this budget is to provide for the collection and disbursement of tax increment revenues. This budget provides for the debt service requirements, Earle Brown Heritage Center capital projects and operating subsidies, and Hennepin County administrative costs associated with the tax increment district. Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Manager B 1992 1993 1994 1994 Recommend REVENUES: Tax Increments $1,379,425 $1,508,964 $1,350,000 $1,335,000 $1,350,000 Land Sales 336,327 Total $1,715,752 $1,508,964 $1,350,000 $1,335,000 $1,350,000 EXPENDITURES: Debt Service Requirements $928,351 $1,200,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $1,285,000 Internal Borrowing Interest 119,511 97,653 104,000 84,000 98,000 County Administrative Expense 1,041 1,042 1,100 1,100 1,100 Land Development Expenses 18,840 E.B. Commons Bankruptcy 65,000 Earle Brown Heritage Center: Capital Projects 143,392 Operating Subsidy 334,727 84,810 153,179 Total $1,545,862 $1,383,505 $1,508,279 $1,400,100 $1,384,100 Comments: The 1995 budget includes a transfer of $1,285,000 to the tax increment debt service funds for the required bond payments in 1995. The internal borrowing interest represents an interest payment paid to other City funds for monies loaned to the T.I.F. District for the project costs that exceeded the bond proceeds. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND 1995 Budget POLICIES: To meet the overall objectives of the Federal Community Development Block Grant Program, as established in the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. The specific objectives are as follows: • Develop and maintain viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment and expanded economic opportunities, principally for low and moderate income persons. • Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight. • Meet other community develpment needs having a particular urgency affecting public health and safety. The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program is funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and is administered by Hennepin County. All revenues received by the C.D.B.G. Fund are transfered to the E.D.A. Special Operating Fund. Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Manager Budget 1992 1993 1994 1994 Recommend REVENUES: C.D.B.G. Revenue $251,747 $240,781 $235,627 $230,000 $253,334 Total $251,747 $240,781 $235,627 $230,000 $253,334 EXPENDITURES: Transfer to E.D.A. Fund $251,747 $240,781 $235,627 $230,000 $253,334 Total $251,747 $240,781 $235,627 $230,000 $253,334 � ENTERPRISE FUNDS ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS SUMMARIES • • LIQUOR STORES 1995 Budget POLICIES: + Assure and enforce state and local liquor laws to Insure that alcoholic products are not sold to minors and those who are obviously Intoxicated. + Identify the tastes and Interests of the community and develop products lines accordingly. + Provide a balance of products and services for a variety of age groups. + Continue to review the trends of new and changing product lines. It is our ultimate goal to maintain a safe community by dispensing alcoholic products to our citizens in a lawful manner and still maintain a reasonable profit. ACTWITIES: Percent of Sales Budget STAFFING: Humboldt Liquor Store 29% 1.00 Liquor Stores' Manager Boulevard Liquor Store 34% 2.00 Liquor Store Supervisors Northbrook Liquor Store 37% 0.85 Office Assistant 100% 11.40 Cashier /Clerk 15.25 Full -time Equivalents Actual Actual Estimated Requested Manager Budget 1992 1993 1994 1995 Recommend REVENUES: Liquor Sales $835,493 $860,914 $862,798 $875,000 $875,000 Wine Sales 286,302 265,333 266,891 267,000 267,000 Beer Sales 1,373,225 1,318,596 1,372,455 1,400,000 1,400,000 Other Sales 170,731 171,030 165,375 170,000 170,000 Investment Earnings 1,203 3,125 3,300 3,300 3,300 Total Revenues $2,666,954 $2,618,998 $2,670,819 $2,715,300 $2,715,300 Less: Cost of Sales $2,011,069 $1,975,491 $2,016,468 $2,047,561 $2,047,561 Gross Profit $655,885 $643,507 $654,351 $667,739 $667,739 EXPENDITURES: Personnel $343,674 $356,468 $371,937 $362,256 $362,256 Supplies 8,357 6,481 5,098 8,500 8,500 Other Contractual Services 51,499 51,705 54,813 35,330 35,330 Building Rent 36,031 38,897 35,128 35,950 35,950 Insurance 30,550 31,534 12,266 13,220 13,220 Utilities 20,367 23,119 23,655 23,810 23,810 Depreciation 28,765 29,043 10,215 25,895 25,895 Interest Expense 17,757 16,193 14,547 12,640 12,640 Capital Outlay 4,253 6,069 2,000 12,000 12,000 Contingency 0 0 0 9,050 9,050 Total Expenditures $541,253 $559,509 $529,659 $538,651 $538,651 Operating Income $114,632 $83,998 $124,692 $129,088 $129,088 General Fund Transfer $65,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 Net Income $49,632 ($16,002) $24,692 $29,088 $29,088 Staffing (FTE) 15.8 15.1 15.3 15.3 15.3 COMMENTS: The Liquor Stores experienced significant cash outflows in 1994 due to the purchase of a new cash register(nventory control system. Profits in 1994 and 1995 are needed to get the fund back to the cash position it held at the end of 1993. FUND: LIQUOR FUND Activity: HUMBOLDT STORE Activity Description This activity accounts for the Humboldt Municipal Liquor Store located at 1500 69th Avenue North. Percent of Total Sales Budget 29% 1995 Objectives 1) To increase sales. 2) To decrease shoplifting. 3) To try and maintain a constant level of part-time staff. 4) Improve efficiency due to the new liquor inventory control system & cash registers. Recommended 1995 Budget REVENUES: Liquor Sales $252,875 Wine Sales 77,163 Beer Sales 404,600 Other Sales 49,262 Investment Earnings 1,100 ® Total Revenues $785,000 Less: Cost of Sales $591,845 Gross Profit $193,155 EXPENDITURES: STAFFING: Personnel $115,509 0.50 Liquor Stores' Manager Supplies 3,000 0.85 Office Assistant Other Contractual Services 11,800 3.80 Cashier /Clerk Insurance 4,230 Utilities 9,280 5.15 Full -time Equivalents Depreciation 11,105 Interest Expense 12,640 Capital Outlay 4,000 Contigency 2,800 Total Expenditures $174,364 Operating Income $18,791 Comments: This budget includes a capital outlay request for the purchase and installation of surveillance equipment. FUND: LIQUOR FUND Activity: BOULEVARD STORE Activity Description This activity accounts for the Boulevard Municipal Liquor Store located at 6250 Brooklyn Boulevard. Percent of Total Sales Budget 34% 1995 Objectives 1) To increase sales. 2) To decrease shoplifting. 3) To try and maintain a constant level of part -time staff. 4) Improve efficiency due to the new liquor inventory control system & cash registers. Recommended 1995 Budget REVENUES: Liquor Sales $301,000 Wine Sales 91,848 Beer Sales 482,872 Other Sales 58,480 Investment Earnings 1,100 Total Revenues $935,300 Less: Cost of Sales $705,321 Gross Profit $229,979 EXPENDITURES: STAFFING: Personnel $121,344 0.25 Liquor Stores' Manager Supplies 3,000 1.00 Liquor Store Supervisors Other Contractual Services 12,600 3.80 Cashier /Clerk Insurance 4,540 Utilities 6,880 5.05 Full -time Equivalents Depreciation 6,185 Capital Outlay 4,000 Contingency 3,000 Total Expenditures $161,549 Operating Income $68,430 Comments: This budget includes a capital outlay request for the purchase and installation of surveillance equipment. 49 FUND: LIQUOR FUND Activity: NORTHBROOK STORE Activity Description This activity accounts for the Northbrook Municipal Liquor Store located at 1966 57th Avenue North. Percent of Total Sales Budget 37% 1995 Objectives 1) To increase sales. 2) To decrease shoplifting. 3) To try and maintain a constant level of part-time staff. 4) Improve efficiency due to the new liquor inventory control system & cash registers. Recommended 1995 Budget REVENUES: Liquor Sales $321,125 Wine Sales 97,989 Beer Sales 512,528 Other Sales 62,258 Investment Earnings 1,100 Total Revenues $995,000 Less: Cost of Sales $750,395 Gross Profit $244,605 EXPENDITURES: STAFFING: Personnel $125,403 0.25 Liquor Stores' Manager Supplies 2,500 1.00 Liquor Store Supervisors Other Contractual Services 10,930 3.80 Cashier /Clerk Building Rent 35,950 Insurance 4,450 5.05 Full -time Equivalents Utilities 7,650 Depreciation 8,605 Capital Outlay 4,000 Contigency 3,250 Total Expenditures $202,738 Operating Income $41,867 Comments: This budget includes a capital outlay request for the purchase and installation of surveillance equipment. LIQUOR STORES 1995 Budget Detail of Capital Outlay Total Manager Description Store Cost Requested Recommended 1. Surveillance Equipment 3 @ 4000 $12,000 12,000 Total Capital Outlay $12,000 $12,000 CENTERBROOK GOLF COURSE 1995 Budget POLICIES: + Continue to provide an outstanding par three golf course which can be enjoyed to the utmost by the golfers of this area. ACTIVITIES: _Percent of Budget STAFFING: Golf Operations 68% 1.00 Grounds Supervisor Grounds Maintenance 32% 2.00 Club House 0.75 Course Rangers 100% 1.50 Course Maintenance 0.25 Golf Lessons 5.50 Full -time Equivalents Actual Actual Adopted Department Manager Budget 1992 1993 1994 Requested Recommend REVENUES: Green Fees $216,491 $213,469 $241,400 $243,200 $243,200 Merchandise Sales 20,545 19,918 21,000 18,000 18,000 Concessions 18,599 17,348 18,000 18,000 18,000 Other Sales 29,288 29,298 29,600 29,500 29,500 Investment Earnings 3,633 2,332 0 Total Revenues $288,556 $282,365 $310,000 $308,700 $308,700 Less: Cost of Sales $28,102 $29,352 $30,000 $28,500 $28,500 Gross Profit $260,454 $253,013 $280,000 $280,200 $280,200 EXPENDITURES: Personnel $119,645 $121,636 $125,800 $111,567 $111,567 Admin. Services Transfer 6,500 7,000 6,800 6,200 6,200 Supplies 13,883 16,061 16,900 17,800 17,800 Other Contractual Services 10,219 17,801 18,545 17,940 17,940 Insurance 3,769 3,767 8,000 8,150 8,150 Utilities 9,770 8,943 10,375 9,500 9,500 Vehicle /Equipment Charges 0 0 22,000 19,800 19,800 Depreciation 25,435 23,236 13,365 15,725 15,725 Interest Expense 56,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 Total Expenditures $245,221 $252,444 $275,785 $260,682 $260,682 Net Income $15,233 $569 $4,215 $19,518 $19,518 Staffing (FTE) 5.6 5.8 5.5 5.5 5.5 COMMENTS: The Golf Course experienced significant cash outflows in 1994 due to the reconstruction of the pedestrian bridge and the need to transfer cash to the Central Garage Fund for past depreciation on equipment. Profits in 1995 are needed to get the fund back to the cash position it held at the end of 1993. Any excess cash is used to pay down the loan from the Capital Improvements Fund. DEPARTMENT: Golf Course ACTIVITY: Golf Operations Activity Description This activity provides for the people wishing to play golf at Centerbrook such as purchasing green fees, buying golf equipment, and helping them to understand the rules and regulations of the course. Percent of Total Dept. Budget 68% 1995 Objectives 1) Conduct a marketing study to increase the number of golfers and improve service. 2) Increase the number of people taking lessions. 3) Make sure that the golfers are able to play at a good pace. Part -time Employees Recommended 1995 Budget Revenues Staff Allocation Green Fees $184,420 Club House 2.00 Merchandise Sales 18,000 Course Rangers 0.75 Concessions 18,000 Golf Lessons 0.25 Other Sales 29,500 Total 3.00 Total Revenues $249,920 Less: Cost of Sales $28,500 Gross Profit $221,420 Expenditures Personnel $50,471 Admin. Services Transfer 6,200 Supplies 7,100 Contractual Services 15,340 Insurance 8,150 Utilities 9,500 Depreciation 15,725 Interest Expense 54,000 Total $166,486 Comments: DEPARTMENT: Golf Course ACTIVITY: Grounds Maintenance Activity Description This activity provides for the maintenance of the golf course. Percent of Total Dept. Budget 32% 1995 Objectives 1) To improve the appearance of the course by adding more flowers and trees. Part -time Employees Recommended 1995 Budget Revenues Staff Allocation Green Fees $94,196 Grounds Supervisor 1.00 Course Maintenance 1.50 Total $94,196 Total 2.50 Expenditures Personnel 61,096 Supplies 10,700 Other Contractual S 2,600 Vehicle /Equipment 19,800 Total $94,196 Comments: EARLE BROWN HERITAGE,CENTER 1995 Budget POLICIES: + To provide meeting facilities which will attract multiple day events thereby providing revenue to area hotel, restaurant, and retail facilities. + To provide the highest level of product and service in the meeting industry. + To develop new corporate, social, and trade show clients while retaining current users. + To preserve the historic redevelopment of Brooklyn Farm by maintaining the physical plant and grounds. Mission Statement: Earle Brown Heritage Center is dedicated to providing unique facilities for meetings, conferences and special events with style, courtesy and superior service. ACTIVITIES: Percent of Sales Budget STAFFING: Convention Center 81% 1.00 Manager Inn on the Farm 10% 1.00 Maintenance Supervisor Earles Restaurant 5% 1.00 Sales Director Office Rentals 4% 3.00 Sales Managers 100% 1.00 Maintenance Custodian 1.00 Secretary 1.00 Receptionist 1.00 Innkeeper 1.00 Asst. Innkeeper 8.00 Set -up Crew 1.45 Custodian 1.40 Maintenance Worker 0.72 Office Assistant 1.60 Night Auditor 2.60 Hostess/Cook 2.00 Housekeeping/Laundry 28.77 Full -time Equivalents Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Budget 1992 1993 1994 1994 1995 REVENUES: Room Rentals $ 484,003 $605,776 $654,400 $676,644 $795,000 Food & Liquor Sales 73,689 908,371 919,800 1,254,996 1,399,227 Equipment Rents 48,291 73,014 63,000 86,600 101,310 Office Rents 108,842 112,823 116,363 111,498 103,803 Other 80,332 112,111 125,735 120,854 137,899 Total Revenues $795,157 $1,812,095 $1,879,298 $2,250,592 $2,537,239 EXPENDITURES: Personnel $ 550,601 $587,078 $617,425 $620,004 $722,727 Contract Personnel 0 291,289 309,764 396,521 456,863 Management Fees 0 75,271 94,150 109,372 122,500 Food S Liquor Costs 19,975 236,303 249,461 322,976 368,051 Supplies 60,577 127,029 160,858 136,991 146,588 Utilities 120,713 128,653 128,690 134,375 137,575 Other 252,096 331,158 308,653 367,370 336,245 Capital Outlay 38,862 30,824 22,537 35,581 82,656 Contigency 0 18,947 0 22,090 Total Expenditures $1,042,824 $1,807,605 $1,910,485 $2,123,190 $2,395,295 Operating Income ($247,667) $4,490 ($31,187) $127,402 $141,944 Administrative Services (54,240) (38,160) (42,192) (42,192) (51,916) Property Taxes (62,541) (65,679) (71,800) (64,499) (67,196) Interest Paid to the City (9,141) (14,298) (8 (20,711) (22,832) Net Income (Loss) 1$373,589) ($113,647) ($153,179) $0 $0 Staffing (FTE) 23.8 24.4 24.3 25.0 28.8 COMMENTS: See following page for budget comments. EBHC . 1995 BUDGET ADDITIONAL COMMENTS The 1995 budget is aggressive. The Heritage Center has the growth potential to sustain this budget. The very high level of service provided to the clients does require a commitment to staffing increases to meet the demand. However, current staff is stretched and will not be able to support the additional sales volume development without the additions requested. The addition of Earle's to the Inn, while still in its first year start -up mode, is providing the additional exposure we had hoped to see. Reservations are increasing and the guest response to the concept has been overwhelming. Area hotels, restaurants and shopping are benefiting from the Centers' presence in the community. The trickle down effect in 1994 should be close to half a million dollars. The facility also has provided visibility and recognition to Brooklyn Center in terms of uniqueness, product value, and service levels. These intangible assets are of great value. FUND: EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER Activity: CONVENTION CENTER s Activity Description The Convention Center provides a unique conference, social, and trade show environment where guest service and client satisfaction build a solid base of repeat customers. Catering provides food and beverage services to the facility as a whole while maintaining the highest service standards, exceptional food product, and consistent level of profitability. Percent of Total Sales Budget 81% 1995 Objectives Convention Center 1) Continue to develop new clients through direct mail campaigns and on -site facility exposure. 2) Continue prior trends of yearly business increases by booking an additional 24% over 1994. 3) Continue ongoing maintenance & painting required to present the facility in the best possible light. Catering 1) Continue to provide the finest quality of food and beverage to Heritage Center clients. 2) Develop additional revenue by increasing some food prices and by creating new menus to satisfy repeat clients. 3) Aggressively market and sell catering services to reflect a sales increase consistent with the increased room rental budget. 1993 1994 1995 Actual Estimated Budget REVENUES: Room Rentals $408,456 $460,000 $585,000 Food & Liquor Sales 900,703 1,202,982 1,260,875 STAFFING: Equipment Rentals 73,014 86,600 101,310 0.80 Manager Other 100,254 100,498 111,102 0.73 Maint. Supervisor Total Revenues $1,482,427 $1,850,080 $2,058,287 1.00 Sales Director 3.00 Sales Manager EXPENDITURES: 0.73 Maint. Custodian Personnel $384,872 $395,179 $500,166 1.00 Secretary Contract Personnel 291,289 381,976 431,630 0.94 Receptionist Management Fees 75,271 105,172 110,500 8.00 Set -up Crew Food & Liquor Costs 218,127 274,020 305,885 1.05 Custodian Supplies 102,850 111,667 116,307 1.05 Maint. Worker Promotion/Advertising 69,984 54,825 57,053 0.72 Office Assistant Repairs & Rentals 54,295 53,318 59,662 19.02 FTE's Utilities 104,909 108,591 111,660 Other 121,423 123,620 130,409 Capital Outlay 29,530 34,374 70,808 Contingency 0 0 17,126 Total Expenditures $1,452,550 $1,642,742 $1,911,206 Operating Income (Loss) $29,877 $207,338 $147,081 Administrative Services (21,200) (26,370) (28,842) Interest Paid to the City (7,820) (11,654) (12,157) Net Income/(Loss) $857 $169,314 $106,082 Comments: See following pages for budget comments CONVENTION CENTER 1995 BUDGET ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Revenues reflect the effect of a 24% increase in room rentals. This is a very aggressive goal which requires the addition of one sales position and a half -time clerical position. The Heritage Center has developed a solid customer - oriented service reputation. Maintaining this reputation creates high staffing demands. Capitol Outlay: Carpet in the Stable is worn, stained, has some burns and needs replacing. We rent chairs too often due to higher occupancy and need to purchase 200 (minimum order for price break). Computers are six years old, technologicaly outdated, and need upgrading to allow quicker response to clients and increased help to staff. Sales revenues have continued to grow at a pace of 12 -15% year to year for the last three years. Catering revenues reflect increased volume due to the anticipated higher level of business in 1995 and due to a small (approximately 3 %) price increase over 1994 prices. The following chart will clearly show the growth of activity in terms of number of events held by year: 1990 (April to December) 135 events 1991 (Full year) 237 events +75.5% 1992 (Full year) 401 events +69% 1993 (Full year) *467 events + 16.4% 1994 (10 Month actual,2 month est.) *497 events +6.2% *Increased booking of multiple day events. CONVENTION CENTER 1995 Budget Detail of Capital Outlay Total Manager Description Unit/Cost Requested Recommended 1. Remodel Loft Area $6,000 $6,000 2. Carpet - Captains /Estate 13,557 13,557 3. Action Stacker Chairs 200 @ 121 24,192 24,192 4. Sound System - C Barn 1,820 1,820 5. Hand -Held Microphone 1 @ 1086 1,086 1,086 * 6. Buhl Overhead & Cart 1 @ 902 902 902 * 7. 10 x 10 First Fold Screen 1 @ 602 602 602 * S. Television & Cart 1 @ 771 771 771 * 9. Network Computer 1 @ 4500 4,500 4,500 10. Personal Computers 6 @ 2260 13,560 13,560 11. Mail Server Pack 1 @ 455 455 455 12. Microsoft Office Upgrade 3 @ 282 846 846 13. Microsoft Office 3 @ 479 1,437 1,437 14. Computer Training 1,080 1 Total Capital Outlay $70,808 $70,808 Comments: * The noted capital outlay items are supported by rental charges to clients. Expected payback period for the microphone, overhead & cart, and screen is less than one year. FUND: EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER Activity: INN ON THE FARM Activity Description The activity of the Inn is a two -fold process: 1. A historic reservation which serves as a showcase fo much of the communi 's past; and p r ty p, 2. Serving as a working Country Inn serving social, corporate, and travel clientele who are visiting and /or doing business in the North Metro Area. Percent of Total Sales Budget 10% 1995 Objectives 1) To continue development of corporate clients who are the base of our repeat business. 2) To maintain the strong occupancy levels experienced during 1994. 3) To develop direct mail or other promotions to increase winter occupancy. 1993 1994 1995 Actual Estimated Budget REVENUES: Room Rentals $183,360 $203,244 $210,000 Meal Sales 7,668 19,975 25,200 STAFFING: Facility Rentals 13,960 13,400 13,100 0.10 Manager Other 6,635 15,527 8,533 0.10 Maint. Supervisor Total Revenues $211,623 $252,146 $256,833 0.10 Maint. Custodian 0.80 Innkeeper EXPENDITURES: 0.80 Asst. Innkeeper Personnel $179,672 $186,068 $175,491 0.06 Receptionist Supplies 18,299 19,182 21,915 1.60 Night Auditor Food Costs 18,176 37,931 30,550 2.60 Hostess/Cook Other Services 25,331 28,825 24,674 2.00 Housekeeper Advertising 25,851 17,606 15,126 Repairs & Rentals 15,511 12,784 8,531 8.16 FTE's Insurance 1,381 3,719 3,884 Utilities 17,023 18,528 18,572 Capital Outlay 740 1,207 8,726 Contingency 0 0 3,618 Total Expenditures $301,984 $325,850 $311,087 Operating Income (Loss) ($90,361) ($73,704) ($54,254) Administrative Services ($12,720) ($10,548) ($14,421) Property Taxes (29,133) (28,626) (29,816) Interest Paid to the City (6,478) (9,057) (10,675) Net Income/(Loss) ($138,692) $121 935? ($109,166) Comments: See following pages for budget comments. INN ON THE FARM 1995 BUDGET ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Revenue from overnight accommodations reflects an occupancy rate of 68% at an A.D.R. (average daily rate) of $85.00. Room prices have been raised up to $20.00 per room per night to create a unified single price structure (except for suite). Corporate rate continues at $72.00 weekdays, $90.00 weekends. Occupancy levels have grown from 16% in 1991 to approximately 65% for 1994, and has averaged over 75% since June. Seminar and retreat business has strongly developed in the last two years from 67 to 170 (est.), an increase of 253 %. The high occupancy levels, increased corporate seminar business, and addition of a restaurant require that the Innkeeper have an assistant trained in the management of the Inn. Hours projected for this position are deleted from part -time hours. The additional cost of the position is the benefits package which will aid in keeping that trained staff person. Capitol outlay requires purchase of 22 chairs for the Sunroom. Original chairs purchased are worn out, unraveling and need to be replaced. New chairs speced are similar in appearance but are far more durable and comfortable for day long seminar use. INN ON THE FARM 1995 Budget Detail of Capital Outlay Total Manager Description Unit/Cost Requested Recommended 1. Commercial Washer and Commercial Dryer 2 @700 $1,400 $1,400 2. Chairs for Sunroom 22 @ 333 7,326 7,326 Total Capital Outlay $8,726 $8,726 FUND: EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER Activity: EARLES Activity Description Earles serves a complement to the Inn and the Heritage Center as a whole by offering the complete package of overnight accommodations and a dining opportunity. Earles features Midwest cuisine of the past and present which is in keeping with the spirit of a historic preservation. Percent of Total Sales Budget 5% 1995 Objectives 1) Develop a minimum occupancy average of 32 covers. 2) Maintain exceptional food quality while promoting regional gourmet cuisine. 3) Provide unparalleled service to guests. 4) Increase exposure to the Inn through Earle's guests. 1994 1995 Estimated Budget REVENUES: Meal Sales $26,039 $96,512 Liquor Sales 6,000 16,640 Total Revenues $32,039 $113,152 EXPENDITURES: STAFFING: Personnel $5,970 $18,316 0.05 Manager Contract Personnel 14,545 25,233 0.02 Maintenance Supervisor Management Fees 4,200 12,000 0.02 Maintenance Custodian Supplies 768 985 0.20 Innkeeper Food & Liquor Costs 11,025 31,616 0.20 Asst. Innkeeper Other Services 1,396 3,228 Advertising 9,444 12,075 0.49 FTE's Repairs & Rentals 0 1,028 Opening Costs 44,789 0 Contingency 0 287 Total Expenditures $92,137 $104,768 Operating Income (Loss) ($60,098) $8,384 Administrative Services $0 ($2,885) Net Income /(Loss) ($60,098) $5,499 Comments: Food revenues are based on 32 reservations (covers) per night, two nights a week (104 nights for the year), at a per person cost of $28.50. Liquor revenues are based on the same reservation basis at a $5.00 per person cost. Occupancy is figured at 40 %. Earle's is still in its first year start up mode. The critic's reviews of food and concept have been very complimentary. Guests continue to express delight at the concept and content. Saturday reservations are running about 25 covers, with Friday at lower levels. As with the Inn and Convention Center, growth will come with exposure. FUND: EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER Activity: OFFICE RENTALS Activity Description The H and D Barns provide commercial office rental space for a variety of tenants under leases to the Heritage Center for specified terms. Percent of Total Sales Budget 4% 1995 Objectives 1) To maintain 100% occupancy of the commercial office space. 2) To continue to provide appropriate maintenance to maintain current high standards. 3) To respond to tenant concerns, if any, in a timely manner. 1993 1994 1995 Actual Estimated Budget REVENUES: Office Rents $112,823 $111,498 $103,803 Cleaning Services 4,288 4,529 4,620 Other 934 300 544 Total Revenues $118,045 $116,327 $108,967 EXPENDITURES: STAFFING: Personnel $22,534 $32,787 $28,754 0.05 Manager Supplies 5,880 5,374 7,381 0.15 Maint. Supervisor Other Services 7,322 7,782 14,634 0.15 Maint. Custodian Repairs & Rentals 8,650 7,133 3,525 0.40 Custodian Insurance 1,410 2,129 2,416 0.35 Maint. Worker Utilities 6,721 7,256 7,343 Capital Outlay 554 0 3,122 1.10 FTE's Contingency 0 0 1,059 Total Expenditures $53,071 $62,461 $68,234 Operating Income (Loss) $64,974 $53,866 $40,733 Administrative Services (4,240) (5,274) (5,768) Property Taxes (36,546) (35,873) (37,380) Net Income /(Loss) $24,188 $12,719 ($2,415) Comments: Revenues reflect: 1. Loss of Farm Journal in "H" Barn. 2. Move of North Metro CVB from Stable to "H" Barn. 3. Use of former CVB space for Heritage Center Catering staff. OFFICE RENTALS 1995 Budget Detail of Capital Outlay Total Manager Description Unit/Cost Requested Recommended 1. Paint Sprayer 1 @ 2024 $1,622 $1,622 2. Remove Office Walls 1,500 1,500 Total Capital Outlay $3,122 $3,122 WATER UTILITY FUND Preliminary 1995 Budget POLICIES: + Maintain a comprehensive system for water pumping, storage and distribution + Identify infrastructure needs and develop funding mechanisms which are fiscally responsible while providing adequate revenue This fund accounts for the provision of water to customers. Administration, wells, storage, and distribution are included. The fund is managed by the Public Services Director and has been established as an enterprise fund. Enterprise funds are self supporting activities of the city which render services on a user charge basis to the general public ACTIVITIES: Percent of Budget STAFFING: Well Maintenance & Repair 24% 0.48 Public Utilities Supervisor Tower Maintenance & Repair 1 % 4.43 Maintenance II General Maintenance & Repair 27% 0.58 Part Time Work for Customers /Contractors 29% 5.49 Full -Time Equivalents Water Quality /Safety 9% Administration 10% 100% Actual Actual Estimated Requested Budget 1992 1993 1994 1995 REVENUES: Service to Customers $843,697 $772,401 $943,000 $1,032,000 Meter Sales 18,401 30,346 20,000 19,000 Penalties 34,759 45,387 30,000 30,000 Investment Earnings 286,501 280,860 237,644 219,531 Special Assessments 28,283 30,101 19,000 20,000 Other Revenue 1,767 820 1,000 1,000 Total Revenues $1,213,408 $1,159,915 $1,250,644 $1,321,531 EXPENDITURES: Personnel $244,213 $228,702 $221,967 $215,193 Supplies 105,388 68,699 90,312 92,700 Other Contractual Services 173,799 127,291 148,542 152,999 Utilities 134,905 128,901 135,346 142,113 Depreciation 233,447 267,279 246,500 260,000 Interest and Fiscal Fees 1,940 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $893,692 $820,872 $842,667 $863,005 Operating Income $319,716 $339,043 $407,977 $458,526 Vehicle Maint Reimbursement $0 $16,925 $39,414 $43,218 Admin. Services Transfer 104,100 88,581 102,635 115,652 Total Transfers $104,100 $105,506 $142,049 $158,870 Net Income $215,616 $233,537 $265,928 $299,656 Staffing (FTE) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 COMMENTS: The above schedule does not include proposed substantial capital outlays associated with street or utility improvement projects. Please see the attached balance sheet for a more complete picture of the utility's financial condition. DEPARTMENT: Water (156) ACTIVITY: Well Maintenance And Repair Activity Description This activity includes: 1) Maintenance of the city's nine wells, which includes buildings, equipment and property. 2) Monitoring the Jordan Aquifer, which is the city's source of water. Percent of Total Dept. Budget 24% 1995 Objectives 1) Continue six year maintenance cycle for wells. Pull, inspect and make necessary repairs. 2) Monitor static/pumping levels and well depths as required by the MN Dept. of Health. 3) Maintain chemical feed equipment. Repair, replace and continue preventative maintenance. 4) Make necessary emergency repairs in a timely fashion. 5) Preventative maintenance on electrical controls and SCADA telemetry system. 6) Building and grounds repair and maintenance. 7) New electric controls at wells 5, 6 and 7. Requested 1995 Budget Revenues Property Tax/Misc $16,800 Service Charges 172,316 Total $189,116 Expenditures Staff Allocation FTE's Personnel $51,647 Public Utilities Supervisor 0.04 Supplies $25,029 Maintenance II 0;99 -: Utility Charges $38,371 Part-time 0.03 Contractual Services $0 FTEs, this activity 1.06 Vehicle Services $11,669 Depreciation $62,400 Total $189,116 Comment DEPARTMENT: Water (156) ACTIVITY: Tower Maintenance i And Repair Activity Description This activity includes: Maintenance of the city's three elevated storage tanks, which have a combined total of three million gallons. Percent of Total Dept. Budget 1% 1995 Objectives 1) Routine inspections, interior and exterior, to maintain integrity. 2) Maintain tower coatings to insure structural integrity, complying with all state and federal rules and regulations pertaining to application. 3) Maintain proper fluctuation during winter months to avoid possible damage to structures. 4) Maintain accurate calibration of all tower levels. 5) Landscape tower #1. 6) Paint tower #2. Requested 1995 Budget Revenues Property Tax/Misc $700 Service Charges 6,832 Total $7,532 Expenditures Staff Allocation FTE's Personnel $2,152 Public Utilities Supervisor 0.01 Suppiies $927 Maintenance II 0.01 Utility Charges $1,421 Part-time Contractual Services $0 FTEs, this activity 0.02 Vehicle Services $432 Depreciation $2,600 Total $7,532 Comment DEPARTMENT: Water (156) ACTIVITY: General Maintenance And Repair Activity Description This activity includes : Maintenance and emergency repair of the water distribution system and its appurtenances. The city has 115 miles of water main, 1,411 water valves and 837 fire hydrants. Percent of Total Dept. Budget 27% 1995 Objectives 1) Routine maintenance and emergency repair of fire hydrants. 2) Routine maintenance and emergency repair of gate valves. 3) Repair of water main breaks. 4) Seasonal and routine flushing of water mains 5) Update SCADA hardware and software. Requested 1995 Budget Revenues Property Tax/Misc $18,900 Service Charges 376,810 Total $395,710 Expenditures Staff Allocation FTE's Personnel $58,102 Public Utilities Supervisor 0.06 Supplies $27,810 Maintenance II 0.94 Utility Charges $42,634 Part-time 0.20 Contractual Services $152,999 FTEs, this activity 1.20 Vehicle Services $12,965 Depreciation $70,200 Capital Outlay $31,000 Total $395,710 Comment DEPARTMENT: Water (156) ACTIVITY: Work For Customers And Contractors Activity Description This activity includes : Maintenance of meters, locating water mains and services and providing services for customers and contractors. The city has 8,336 metered residential connections and 375 metered commercial /industrial connections. Percent of Total Dept. Budget 29% 1995 Objectives 1) Change, read and repair residential and commercial water meters. 2) Provide locating services as per Gopher State One Call. 3) Inspect new water services and mains and disconnects. 4) Provide field accounting such as red tags and shut offs. 5) Provide public information related to ordinances, rules and specifications. 6) Provide fire flow information and assist insurance companies in gathering additional information as needed. i.e. assist with fire flow testing. Requested 1995 Budget Revenues Property Tax/Misc $20,300 Service Charges 206,476 Total $226,776 Expenditures Staff Allocation FTE's Personnel $62,406 Public Utilities Supervisor 0.02 Supplies $29,664 Maintenance II 1.14 Utility Charges $45,476 Part-time 0.11 Contractual Services $0 FTEs, this activity 1.27 Vehicle Services $13,830 Depreciation $75,400 Total $226,776 Comment DEPARTMENT: Water (156) ACTIVITY: Water Quality And Safety Activity Description This activity includes: 1) Testing of the municipal water supply as required, plus additional proactive testing. 2) Training in chemical handling and safety, machine and work zone safety and other training deemed necessary. Percent of Total Dept. Budget 9% 1995 Objectives 1) Eight bacteria samples taken weekly, as required by the state health dept. 2) Daily flouride samples collected and tested in house. Monthly report to the state. 3) Lead /copper and other samples collected as required by the state health dept. 4) Proactive samples collected and tested in house and by contracted labs. 5) Training sponsored by the MN Dept. of Health 6) Yearly training by the city in right to know, confined space entry and work zone safety and other training as deemed necessary. Requested 1995 Budget Q 9 Revenues Property Tax/Misc $6,300 Service Charges 64,270 Total $70.570 Expenditures Staff Allocation FTE's Personnel $19,367 Public Utilities Supervisor 0.02 Supplies $9,270 Maintenance II 0.37 Utility Charges $14,211 Part-time 0.01 Depreciation $23,400 FTEs, this activity 0.40 Vehicle Services $4,322 Capital Outlay $0 Total $70,570 Comment Capital outlay items include; a truck and truck mounted drill rig and a cut off saw. i DEPARTMENT: Water (156) ACTIVITY: Administration Activity Description This activity includes : Administration of water department functions, practices, rules and procedures. Percent of Total Dept. Budget 10% 1995 Objectives 1) Begin preparing public facilities plan as required by the metropolitan council. Plan is due by January 1, 1996. 2) Maintain records and prepare regular and special reports as required. 3) Supervise operation and maintenance of the municipal water supply system. 4) Monitor operational budget and authorize expenditures in compliance with policies and procedures. 5) Supervise programs to monitor water consumption and enforce policies related to delinquent accounts, as well as work by others which may impact the public utilities system. 6) Review and evaluate the performance of utility personnel and provide training, positive reinforcement and constructive directives. 7) Enforce safety and environmental rules and regulations. 8) Keep divisional personnel currently informed of City polices /procedures and accountable for their job responsibilities. 9) Evaluate and coordinate the appropriate response to emergency situations. Requested 1995 Budget Revenues Property Tax/Misc $7,000 Service Charges 156,171 Total $163,171 Expenditures Staff Allocation FTE's Personnel $21,519 Public Utilities Supervisor 0.33 Supplies $0 Maintenance II 0.13 Admin Services $115,652 Part-time 0.00 Contractual Services $0 FTEs, this activity 0.46 Depreciation $26,000 Capital Outlay $0 Total $163,171 Comment WATER UTILITY FUND 1995 Budget Detail of Capital Outlay Total Manager Description Unit/Cost Requested Recommend 1. Truck Mounted Drill Rig 1 @13,000 $13,000 $13,000 2. Truck 1 @ 17,000 17,000 17,000 3. Cut Off Saw 1@1,000 1,000 1,000 Total Capital Outlay $31,000 $31,000 M SANITARY SEWER FUND Preliminary 1995 Budget POLICIES: + Maintain a comprehensive system for collection and pumping of sanitary sewage + Identify infrastructure needs and develop funding mechanisms which are fiscally responsible while providing adequate revenue This fund accounts for the collection and pumping of sanitary sewage through a system of sewer lines and lift stations. Sewage is treated by the Metropoiltan Council Wastewater Services, whose fees account for approximately 72% of this fund's expenditures. The fund is managed by the Public Services Director and has been established as an enterprise fund. Enterprise funds are self supporting activities of the city which render services on a user charge basis to the general public ACTIVITIES: Percent of Budoet STAFFING: Lift Station Maintenance 6% 0.42 Public Utilities Supervisor General Maintenance 13% 2.20 Maintenance II Work for Customers 2% 0.20 Part Time Administration 7% 2.82 Full -Time Equivalents M.C.W.S. Charges 72% . 100% Actual Actual Estimated Requested Budget 1992 1993 1994 1995 REVENUES: Service to Customers $1,920,796 $2,114,429 $2,229,978 $2,237,415 Investment Earnings 221,547 201,091 166,124 152,647 Other Revenue 560 921 1,000 1,000 Total Revenues $2,142,903 $2,316,441 $2,397,102 $2,391,062 I EXPENDITURES: Personnel $95,890 $93,861 $112,680 $123,696 Supplies 12,995 13,999 14,699 15,434 Other Contractual Services 71,898 58,315 79,002 82,952 M.C.W.S. Charges 1,411,582 1,364,719 1,341,382 1,394,964 Utilities 16,889 17,762 18,650 19,583 Depreciation 194,879 126,055 132,000 152,000 Total Expenditures $1,804,133 $1,674,711 $1,698,413 $1,788,629 Operating Income $338,770 $641,730 $698,689 $602,433 Vehicle Maint. Reimbursement $0 $16,925 $18,650 $68,237 Admin. Services Transfer 104,100 88,569 82,450 77,102 Total Transfers $104,100 $105,494 $101,100 $145,339 Net Income $234,670 $536,236 $597,589 $457,094 Staffing (FTE) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 COMMENTS: The above schedule does not include proposed substantial capital outlays associated with street or utility improvement projects. Please see the attached balance sheet for a more complete picture of the utility's financial condition. SAN95.XLW, 11/10/94 DEPARTMENT: San. Sewer (157) ACTIVITY: Lift Station Maintenance Activity Description This activity includes : Maintenance of the city's ten lift stations, which includes buildings, equipment and property. Percent of Total Dept. Budget 6% 1995 Objectives 1) Continue established preventative maintenance program. 2) Monitor inflow and pump efficiency. 3) Preventative maintenance on electrical controls and Intrac alarm system. 4) Building and grounds repair and maintenance. Seal #2 lift, entire building. 5) Begin engineering /design phase for replacement of #1 lift and force main. Requested 1995 Budget Revenues Property Tax /Misc $320 Service Charges 125,415 Total $125,735 Expenditures Staff Allocation FTE's Personnel $38,346 Public Utilities Supervisor 0.01 Supplies $6,020 Maintenance II 0.60 Utility Charges $7,637 Part -time 0.06 Contractual Services $0 FTEs, this activity 0.67 Vehicle Services $26,612 Depreciation $47,120 Total $125,735 Comment DEPARTMENT: San. Sewer (157) ACTIVITY: General Maintenance And Repair Activity Description This activity includes : Maintenance and emergency repair of the city's sanitary sewer collection system and its appurtenances. The city has approximately 105 miles of sanitary sewer ranging from 8" to 24" in diameter and 8,798 service connections. Percent of Total Dept. Budget 13% 1995 Objectives 1) Continue root sawing of approximately 20 miles of main and identify trouble spots on a yearly basis. 2) Step up routine line cleaning to remove grit, grease, and roots. 3) Televise all project areas and trouble spots as identified by city staff. 4) Establish repairs and or repair projects from information obtained in 1995. 5) Reline 24" cmp from 69th avenue to #1 lift. 6) Monitor inflow and infiltration. Take necessary action to eliminate or reduce. Requested 1995 Budget Revenues Property Tax/Misc $380 Service Charges 195,658 Total $196,038 Expenditures Staff Allocation FTE's Personnel $47,004 Public Utilities Supervisor 0.01 Supplies $7,408 Maintenance II 0.67 Utility Charges $9,400 Part -time 0.14 Contractual Services $82,952 FTEs, this activity 0.82 Vehicle Services QA2,754 - Capital Outlay $16,520 Depreciation $57,760 Total $253,798 Comment DEPARTMENT: San. Sewer (157) ACTIVITY: Work For Customers • and Contractors Activity Description This activity includes : Locating sanitary sewer mains and services and providing services for customers and contractors. The city has 8,798 residential /commercial service connections. Percent of Total Dept. Budget 2% 1995 Objectives 1) Provide locating services as per Gopher State One Call. 2) Inspect new installations as well as repairs on mains and services. 3) Provide public information related to ordinances, rules and specifications. 4) Continue to work with MCWS on a proactive basis. Requested 1995 Budget Revenues Property Tax/Misc $110 Service Charges 43,640 Total $43,750 Expenditures Staff Allocation FTE's Personnel $13,607 Public Utilities Supervisor 0.01 Supplies $2,006 Maintenance II 0.21 Depreciation $16,720 Part-time 0.00 Utility Charges $2,546 FTEs, this activity 0.22 Vehicle Services $8,871 Capital Outlay $0 Total $43,750 Comment DEPARTMENT: San. Sewer (157) ACTIVITY: Administration Activity Description This activity includes : Administration of sanitary sewer department functions, practices, rules and procedures. Percent of Total Dept. Budget 7% 1995 Objectives 1) Begin preparing public facilities plan as required by the metropolitan council. Plan is due by January 1, 1996. 2) Maintain records and prepare regular and special reports as required. 3) Supervise operation and maintenance of the sanitary sewer collection system and the city's ten lift stations. 4) Monitor operational budget and authorize expenditures in compliance with polices and procedures. 5) Supervise and monitor preventative maintenance programs, as well as, work by others which may impact the sanitary sewer system. 6) Review and evaluate the performance of utility maintenance personnel and provide training, positive reinforcement and constructive directives. 7) Enforce safety and environmental rules and regulations. 8) Keep divisional personnel currently informed of City polices /procedures and accountability of theirjob responsibilities. 9) Evaluate and coordinate the appropriate response to emergency situations. Requested 1995 Budget Revenues Property Tax/Misc $200 Service Charges 132,041 Total $132,241 Expenditures Staff Allocation FTE's Personnel $24,739 Public Utilities Supervisor 0.32 Admin. Services $77,102 Maintenance II 0.11 Repair & Maint Services $0 Part=time 0.00 Contractual Services $0 FTEs, this activity 0.43 Depreciation $30,400 Total $132,241 Comment DEPARTMENT: San. Sewer (157) ACTIVITY: M.C.W.S. Charges Activity Description This activity includes : Charges for sewage treated by the Metropoiltan Council Wastewater Services. ' Percent of Total Dept. Budget 72% 1995 Objectives 1) Develop financial plan to ensure sufficient funds to cover charges. 2) Maintain records and prepare regular and special reports as required. Requested 1995 Budget Revenues Property Tax/Misc $0 Service Charges 1,394,964 Total $1,394,964 Expenditures Staff Allocation FTE's Personnel $0 Public Utilities Supervisor 0.00 MCWS Charges $1,394,964 Maintenance II 0.00 Total $1,394,964 Part-time 0.00 FTEs, this activity 0.00 Comment SANITARY SEWER FUND 1995 Budget Detail of Capital Outlay Total Manager Description Unit/Cost Requested Recommended 1. Air Compressor w /accessories 1 @13,600 $13,600 $13,600 2. Air Knife 1 @ 2,300 2,300 2,300 3. Motorola Two -Way Radio 1@ 620 620 620 Total Capital Outlay $16,520 $16,520 STORM DRAINAGE FUND Preliminary 1995 Budget POLICIES: + To develop a proactive system for storm water drainage, while keeping utility costs as affordable as possible + Identify infrastructure needs and develop funding mechanisms which are fiscally responsible and provide adequate revenue The storm drainage fund accounts for the operations and improvements of the storm drainage system. It incorporates not only the storm sewer system, but also water structures such as holding ponds and facilities to improve water quality. Fees are based on the amount of water running off a property and vary with both size and absorption characteristics of the parcel. The fund is managed by the Director of Public Services and is established as an enterprise fund. Enterprise funds are self supporting activities of the city which render services on a user charge basis to the general public. ACTIVITIES: Percent of Budget STAFFING: 0.00 Maintenance 69% 0.00 Management 31% 0.00 100% 0.00 0.00 Full -time Equivalents Actual Actual Estimated Requested Budge 1992 1993 1994 1995 REVENUES: Service to Customers $494,456 $639,837 $702,000 $780,000 Investment Earnings 14,030 28,138 16,035 21,365 Total Revenues $508,486 $667,975 $718,035 $801,365 EXPENDITURES: Supplies 3,481 0 0 0 Other Contractual Services 103,946 60,044 47,000 49,500 Vehicle Maint. Reimburse 7,000 9,728 Depreciation 0 6,685 7,000 29,000 Total Expenditures $107,427 $66,729 $61,000 $88,228 Operating Income $401,059 $601,246 $657,035 $713,137 Admin. Services Transfer 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Net Income $301,059 $501,246 $557,035 $613,137 Staffing (FTE) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 COMMENTS: The above schedule does not include proposed substantial capital outlays associated with street or utility improvement projects. Please see the attached balance sheet for a more complete picture of the utility's financial condition. SDU95.XLW,1 1 /10/94 DEPARTMENT: Storm Sewer (158) ACTIVITY: Management Activity Description This activity includes the development of short and long range work plans, define necessary equipment and manpower needs, list needed permits, pollution issues, government conformance, develop financing plans for capital improvements Percent of Total Dept. Budget 31% 1995 Objectives 1) Initiate preventive maintenance program 2) Establish revenue schedule for capital improvements 3) Assure compliance with current regulations 4) Develop 1996 work plan Requested 1995 Budget • Revenues Service Charges 62,550 Total $62,550 Staff Allocation FTE's Public Utilities Supervisor 0.00 Maintenance H 0.00 Expenditures Part -time 0.00 Contractual Services $49,500 FTEs, this activity 0.00 Vehicle Services $0 Depreciation $13,050 Total $62,550 Comment t DEPARTMENT: Storm Sewer (158) ACTIVITY: Maintenance Activity Description This activity includes the initiation of a cleaning program beyond emergency needs, schedule and repair failing storm sewer structures (30 to 40 per year), prioritize and schedule future maintenance including relining and replacement Percent of Total Dept. Budget 69% 1995 Objectives 1) Clean 8000 feet of storm sewer line 2) Televise all storm sewer line in project areas, plus 2000 additional feet as needed 3) Rebuild 30 storm sewer structures (manholes or catch basins) 4) Additional repair of structures and lines as necessary Requested 1995 Budget Revenues Service Charges 125,678 Total $125,678 Staff Allocation FTE's Public Utilities Supervisor 0.00 Maintenance II 0.00 Expenditures Part -time 0.00 Admin Services $100,000 FTEs, this activity 0.00 Vehicle Services $9,728 Depreciation $15,950 Total $125,678 Comment i RECYCLING FUND Preliminary 5 e a 199 Budg et POLICIES: + To continue an effective program of curbside recycling, while keeping costs as affordable as possible + Identify program needs and develop funding mechanisms which are fiscally responsible and provide adequate revenue The recycling fund accounts for the operations and administration of the cities, state mandated, curbside recycling program. It is primarily comprised of fees paid to the Hennepin Recycling Group (HRG) for recycling services and, the charges to households to cover those costs. Fees are collected on a per household /per month basis. The fund is managed by the Director of Public Services and is established as an enterprise fund. Enterprise funds are self supporting activities of the city which render services on a user charge basis to the general public. ACTIVITIES: Percent of Budget STAFFING: 0.00 Curbside Recycling 100% 0.00 100% 0.00 0.00 S 0.00 Full -time Equivalents Actual Actual Estimated Requested Budget 1992 1993 1994 1995 REVENUES: Service to Customers $103,862 $106,196 $108,000 $213,366 Investment Earnings $4,792 $4,388 $4,100 $3,900 Container Sales 399 567 600 600 Total Revenues $109,053 $111,151 $112,700 $217,866 EXPENDITURES: Supplies 399 567 600 600 Other Contractual Services 103,534 103,527 103,500 208,404 Logis Charges 6,000 6,000 Total Expenditures $103,933 $104,094 $110,100 $215,004 Operating Income $5,120 $7,057 $2,600 $2,862 Net Income $5,120 $7,057 $2,600 $2,862 Staffing (FTE) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 COMMENTS: RECYCLE.XLS, 11/10/94